Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout15) 10A Installation of All-Way Stop Control at the Intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita AvenueAGENDA ITEM 10.A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: November 18, 2014 TO: The Honorable City Council MEMORANDUM FROM: Bryan Cook, City Manager By: Michael D. Forbes, Community Development Director SUBJECT: INSTALLATION OF ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF LONGDEN AVENUE AND ENCINITA AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to adopt Resolution No. 14-5049 approving the installation of an all -way Stop control and related signs and pavement markings at the intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue. BACKGROUND: 1. In November 2012, the City Council adopted the Traffic Calming Master Plan that made recommendations for improvements to help reduce vehicle speeds and cut - through traffic throughout Temple City. The intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue was identified in the plan as having limited sight distance, with suggestions for installing an all -way Stop control or roundabout, and warning signs on Longden Avenue. 2. In early- and mid -2014, staff received feedback from residents around the intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue that it is difficult for vehicles to cross or turn onto Longden Avenue from northbound or southbound Encinita Avenue due to limited sight distance at the intersection. This limited visibility results from the layout of the intersection and curves in Longden Avenue east and west of the intersection with Encinita Avenue. 3. In October 2014, Transtech Engineers, Inc., the City's consultant for engineering services, prepared a Safety Review of Conditions at the Intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue in the City of Temple of City (Attachment "B"). 4. On October 22, 2014, the Transportation and Public Safety Commission considered the proposed all -way Stop control and unanimously recommended approval. City Council November 18, 2014 Page 2 of 3 ANALYSIS: The installation of an all -way Stop control requires the satisfaction of certain requirements, or warrants, set by the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD). The warrants required under CA-MUTCD include the following, and are discussed in greater detail in the attached Safety Review: • minimum traffic volume on street approaches to the intersection • minimum volume of pedestrians crossing at the intersection • speed of traffic through the intersection • number of accidents at the intersection The CA-MUTCD also allows cities to consider additional criteria to justify installation of a Stop control: • the need to control a left turn conflict at the intersection • the need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations generating high pedestrian traffic volumes • locations where a motorist, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to safely negotiate the intersection unless conflicting traffic is also required to stop • the desire to utilize a multi -way Stop control to improve traffic operational characteristics at the intersection of two residential streets of similar design and operating characteristics The Safety Review prepared by Transtech determined that all all -way Stop control is justified for the intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue due to the reduced sight distance at the intersection for vehicles crossing Longden or turning onto Longden from Encinita, pedestrians crossing at the intersection, and cars backing out of driveways near the intersection. Installation of an all -way Stop control would enhance operations and safety at the intersection. In addition to an all -way Stop control, the Safety Review recommends the following additional measures: • install "Stop Ahead" signs and pavement markings using highly reflective paint on Longden Avenue • install curve warning signs on Longden Avenue • install updated speed limit signs and neon green school speed limit signs on Longden Avenue • conduct a speed survey measuring the 85`h percentile speed of traffic two to three months after the all -way Stop control and other signs and markings are installed, to determine if the existing speed limit should be reevaluated and/or if additional measures should be implemented City Council November 18, 2014 Page 3 of 3 The Transportation and Public Safety Commission considered the proposed all -way Stop control and related improvements on October 22, 2014. The Commission unanimously recommended approval of the proposed improvements, with the recommended modification that supplemental "All -Way" placards be added below each of the Stop signs. Adding these supplemental placards is common practice and these would be included if the all -way Stop control is approved by the City Council. CONCLUSION: The intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue has previously been identified as having limited sight visibility. A Safety Review of the intersection has determined that the installation of an all -way Stop control is appropriate and justified pursuant to CA-MUTCD requirements. The recommended all -way Stop control will improve safety and operations at the intersection. FISCAL IMPACT: Transtech estimates that the cost to install the all -way Stop control and related signs and pavement markings is about $4,000. This cost would be reduced if the signs and markings were installed by City staff rather than an outside vendor. This amount can be covered by funds allocated in the Fiscal Year 2014-15 budget for traffic signs and striping maintenance. There would be no budget impact. ATTACHMENTS: A. Resolution No. 14-5049 B. Safety Review of Conditions at the Intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue in the City of Temple of City ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 145049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF AN ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF LONGDEN AVENUE AND ENCINITA AVENUE WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code and the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices provide factors that cities may consider to justify the appropriateness of proposed all -way Stop controls; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the safety review prepared by Transtech Engineers, Inc. justifying the appropriateness of an all -way Stop control and related signs and pavement markings at the intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Temple City approves the installation of an all -way Stop control and related signs and pavement markings at the intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 18'" day of November, 2014. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 14-5049, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 18°i day of November, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmember- NOES: Councilmember- ABSENT: Councilmember- ABSTAIN: Councilmember- City Clerk TRANSTEch MEMO ATTACHMENT B TO Michael D. Forbes, Community Development Director, City of Temple City FROM Yunus Rahi, P.E., T.E., Deputy City Engineer, Transtech Engineers, Inc. Jana Robbins, Senior Transportation Analyst, Transtech Engineers, Inc. Melissa Demirci, Transportation Analyst, Transtech Engineers, Inc. DATE October 8, 2014 SUBJECT SAFETY REVIEW OF CONDITIONS AT THE INTERSECTION OF LONGDEN AVENUE AND ENCINITA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 0lf34M0gItHC Residents have expressed to City staff that it is difficult for vehicles to cross or turn onto Longden Avenue via Encinita Avenue due to limited sight visibility of not being able to see oncoming vehicles traveling eastbound (EB) and westbound (WB) on Longden Avenue. Currently, only the northbound (NB) and southbound (SB) directions on Encinita Avenue are stop controlled, while the EB and WB directions on Longden Avenue are free flowing. East of the intersection along Longden Avenue at Oak Avenue is Longden Elementary School. The Longden Avenue and Oak Avenue intersection is a signalized intersection. There is a curve approaching Encinita Avenue from the west that limits the line of sight for vehicles waiting at the intersection. While there is no marked crosswalk, pedestrians who do cross Longden Avenue are also subject to the same line of sight issue due to the curve. The curve in the roadway also presents a problem for vehicles backing out of residential driveways along Longden Avenue. A City Wide Traffic Calming Master Plan was adopted by the City at the end of 2012 to help reduce and mitigate vehicle speeds and cut -through traffic through the use of both passive devices, like signs and striping, and physical devices such as changes in road elevation or path. The plan identifies 13 Focus Areas A through M. The study intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue is discussed within Focus Area C and Focus Area D as East of Rosemead Boulevard Cut Through Traffic, and Longden Elementary School, respectively. City staff has conducted a safety review analysis that includes a field study of existing conditions, line of sight analysis, accident history, and warrant studies. As part of this study, turning movement counts and 24-hour tube counts were taken at the intersection and across the roadway while school was in session. 13367 Benson Avenue I Chino CA 91710 1 Tgog 5958599 1 F9095908599 1 Transtech.org This report includes all of the above mentioned findings with a summary of recommendations provided at the end. EXISTING CONDITIONS The below image shows the vicinity map of the subject location in relation to the surrounding area. Loneden Avenue: According to the Temple City Circulation Element, Longden Avenue is a collector street with single family homes lining both sides of the street. The street has one lane in each direction separated by a center line striping. There is no stop control on Longden Avenue at Encinita in the EB/WB directions, but a NB/SB stop control for Encinita Avenue. There are no marked crosswalks at this location. The street width is approximately 40 feet at the Encinita Avenue intersection, and increases up to 48 feet at the curve between Loma Avenue and Encinita Avenue. Parking is permitted on both sides with light to moderate parking in this area. Longden Avenue connects to Rosemead Boulevard to the west, and to Temple City Boulevard the east. Per the 2010 Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted for the City of Temple City, the speed limit on Longden Avenue between east and west City limits is posted 35 mph, however a curve warning sign with 25 mph is posted on Longden Avenue at each side of the beginning of the curve for EB and WB traffic approaching Encinita Avenue. Longden Avenue EB Longden Avenue WB Page 2 of 16 Encinita Avenue: According to the Temple City Circulation Element, Encinita Avenue at this location is also a collector street with single family homes on both sides of the roadway. The street has one lane in each direction with a center line striping (Encinita Avenue at Longden Avenue is stop controlled (NB/SB directions). There are no marked crosswalks at this location. The street width is approximately 36 feet at the Longden Avenue intersection. Parking is permitted on both sides with light to moderate parking in this area. Per the 2010 Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted for the City of Temple City, the speed limit on Encinita Avenue between Longden Avenue and Las Tunas Drive is posted at 30 mph. RADAR DATA SUMMARY FOR SEGMENTS ALONG LONG DEN AVENUE AND ENCINITA AVENUE Citystaff conducted a radar speed survey along six different segments of Longden Avenue between Burton Avenue and Agnes Avenue, and Encinita Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Las Tunas Drive. Data was collected for each segment regarding the prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility restrictions, roadway conditions, pedestrian activities, on -street parking and land use adjacent to the roadways. Radar speed measurements were conducted during the month of July 2014. [ 1Aq•p A,! d *,�� Tm ° � W;xllri Sl'�3 a �m > okme 5! Longden Ave is SFG61EM1 SEGMENi2 �a Y s o I n W! 19 U.Mawp 1,1 St 101 St Longden 10 .A 1cd+1a"�3 *-_SEGMENT4 weNxst SEG � Y S � c1r^enY 5+ c n W!dyy PK HPmasA D, ' VsT"&a s 4 o*-" AK = TEMPLE E 3 Q 'r Tenvk Gly 0 x N%[tar!AAv Highway, traffic and roadside land uses for each segment were analyzed for conditions not readily apparent to motorists. Traffic volume and speed in both directions was recorded. The hours of radar operation were restricted to off-peak on a weekday. All surveys were conducted in clear weather. The radar measurements were taken from an unmarked vehicle so as not to alter or impede the free flow of traffic. A total of about 100 samples were obtained Page 3 of 16 ;'�A!1Mb1AK fin d HPmasA D, ' VsT"&a s 4 o*-" AK = TEMPLE E 3 Q 'r Tenvk Gly 0 x N%[tar!AAv Highway, traffic and roadside land uses for each segment were analyzed for conditions not readily apparent to motorists. Traffic volume and speed in both directions was recorded. The hours of radar operation were restricted to off-peak on a weekday. All surveys were conducted in clear weather. The radar measurements were taken from an unmarked vehicle so as not to alter or impede the free flow of traffic. A total of about 100 samples were obtained Page 3 of 16 for each of the six segments surveyed. In no case were sample sizes less than 50 vehicles for each direction. The following tables summarizes the field data for each segment included along Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue. SEGMENT 1 LONGDEN AVENUE: EAST OF BURTON AVENUE TO ROSEMEAD BLVD Streets in Segment that Intersect with Longden Avenue (ADT: 6,569) • Muscatel E/0 • IvarAvenue • Reno Avenue • Rosemead Blvd W/0 • E/O Burton Avenue • Avon Avenue • Lemon Avenue 185th Percentile Speed 35.7 Posted Speed 35 mph Length 2376' 10 MPH Pace 29-38 Accident History from SWITRS (2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009) 5 Years Number of Accidents 4 Severity Location of Accident Type of Accident Surrounding Land Use/Roadway Conditions • Single Family Units some Multi Family • Oversize Speed signs: W/0 Rosemead WB, E/O Injury (4); Property Damage (0) Intersection (2); Midblock (2) Rearend/Improp Turn; Broadside (2); Rearend (SP) Vista WB. • Regular Size Speed Signs: E/0 Furton EB • All -Way Stop at Muscatel • Sidewalks on S/S intermittent on N/S • Parking on Both Sides of Street • Lots of Driveways • County on North side of Longden • Dip at Rosemead • Signal at Rosemead • Strip Commercial and MFDU near Rosemead Page 4 of 16' SEGMENT 2 LONGDEN AVENUE: ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD TO ENCINITA AVENUE Streets in Segment that Intersect with1ongden Avenue (ADT: 8,308) • Rosemead Blvd E/O • Sultana Avenue • Hart Avenue • Loma Avenue • Livia Avenue • Encinita Avenue W/O 85" Percentile Speed 35.4 Length 1 1728' Posted Speed 35 mph 10 MPH 1 26-35 Accident History from SWITRS (2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009) 5 Years Number of Accidents 6 Severity Injury (4); Property Damage (2) Location of Accident Intersection (5); Midblock (1) Type of Accident Rearend/Too Close (3); Broadside (2); Broadside vs Bike (1) Surrounding Land Use/Roadway Conditions • Single Family Units • Sidewalks Both Sides • 35 mph E/0 Rosemead EB regular size • Lots of Driveways • 25 mph Warning of Curve Sign W/O • Parking on Both Sides Encinita Ave • Horizontal Curve Approaching Encinita SEGMENT 3 LONGDEN AVENUE: ENCINITA AVENUE TO TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD Streets in Segment that Intersect with Longden Avenue (ADT: 7,747) • Encinita Avenue E/O • Oak Avenue • Primrose Avenue • Temple City Boulevard W/O 85" Percentile Speed School Zone 25 mph (Radar is not Posted Speed 25 mph performed CVC 22352, 40802) Length 1920' 10 MPH Pace N/A Accident History from SWITRS (2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009) 5 Years Number of Accidents 14 Page 5 of 16 Severity Injury (3); Prope I Location of Accident Intersection (2); Type of Accident Head On; Rearen Surrounding Land Use/Roadway Conditions • Single Family Units • Signal at Oak Ave • Crossing Guard at Oak • Peds Crossing Midblock • Sidewalks on Both Sides • No Left turns onto or out of Primrose (school hours) ty Damage (1) Midblock (2) d Sp; Broadside; Veh vs Ped (age 8) • Curve and 25 mph Warning Signs at Encinita • 25 mph School W/O Oak EB • Longden School between Oak Ave and Primrose Ave • Drop Off to School S/S W/O Primrose • Heavy Parking on N/S SEGMENT 4 LONGDEN AVENUE: TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD TO WEST OF AGNES Streets in Segment that Intersect with Longden Ave (ADT: 6,757) • Temple City Boulevard • Kauffman Avenue • Golden West Avenue • Salter Avenue • Agnes Avenue W/O 185" Percentile Speed 34.4 Posted Speed 35 mph Length 1872' 10 MPH Pace 1 27-36 Accident History from SWITRS (2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009) 5 Years Number of Accidents 6 Severity Injury (4); Property Damage (2) Location of Accident Intersection (6); Midblock (0) Type of Accident Rearend (1); Broadside (3); Veh vs Bike (2) Surrounding Land Use/Roadway Conditions • Single Family Units • 2 Churchs at Kauffman • Signal at Temple City Blvd W/Yellow Xwalks • Sidewalks on Both Sides • Some Multi -Family Units • All -Way Stop at Golden West • 35 mph 50' E/O Temple City Blvd EB (reg size) • 35 mph E/0 Golden West EB (reg size) • 35 mph W/0 Golden West WB (reg size) • Lots of Driveways • Dashed Yellow Center Line Page 6 of 16 SEGMENT 5 ENCINITA AVENUE: LEMON AVENUE TO N/O LONGDEN AVENUE Streets in Segment that Intersect with Encinita Ave (ADT: 1,278) • Lemon Avenue • Fortson Drive • Wooley Street • Olema Street • Longden Avenue (N/0) 851h Percentile Speed 31.2 Posted Speed Not Posted Length 1200' 10 MPH Pace 24-33 Accident History from SWITRS (2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009) 5 Years Number of Accidents 2 Severity Injury (2) Location of Accident Intersection (2); MidBlock (0) Type of Accident Broadside (2) Surrounding Land Use/Roadway Conditions • Single Family Units • Parking on Both Sides • Encinita Turns into Lemon Avenue to the • Dash Yellow Center Line North • No Sidewalks • Residential Driveways SEGMENT 6 ENCINITA AVENUE: S/O LONGDEN AVENUE TO LAS TUNAS DRIVE Streets in Segment that Intersect with Encinita Avenue (ADT: 1,889) • Las Tunas (N/0) • Hermosa Drive • Woodruff Avenue • Garibaldi Avenue • Flaherty Street • Longden Avenue (S/0) 851h Percentile Speed 33.3 Length 1 2760' Posted Speed 30 mph 10 MPH Pace 25-34 Page 7 of 16 Accident History from SWITRS (2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009) 5 Years Number of Accidents 5 Severity Injury (3); Property Damage (2) Location of Accident Intersection (3); Midblock (2) Type of Accident Sideswipe (1) Broadside (2) Broadside/Overturned (1) Rearend (1) Surrounding Land Use/Roadway Conditions • Single Family Units • Posted 30 mph South of Longden SB • Driveways on West Side • Random Sidewalks • Parking on Both Sides • Large Front Yards • N/S Stop at Longden • N/S Stop at Garibaldi • Posted 30 mph South of Garibaldi SB • Offices/Commercial at Las Tunas • Signal at Las Tunas • Posted 30 mph at Hermosa NB • Posted 30 mph N/0 Garibaldi NB • Small Decorative Street lights on E/S • Regular Street Lights near Longden • Faint Center Line SIGHT DISTANCE AT LONGDEN AVENUE AND ENCINITA AVENUE Stopping sight distance is defined as the distance needed for drivers to see an object or vehicle on the roadway ahead and bring their vehicles to a safe stop before colliding. The distances are derived for various design speeds. Currently Longden Avenue curves in both the WB and EB direction approaching Encinita Avenue, causing decreased line of sight for vehicles and pedestrians on Encinita Avenue wishing to turn onto or drive, through Longden Avenue. Per field measurements, the vehicle sight distance from the stop sign for vehicles traveling NB on Encinita Avenue wanting to make a left turn is 206 feet; the vehicle sight distance from the stop sign for vehicles traveling SB on Encinita Avenue wanting to make a left turn is 170 feet. There is no stop control at the intersection west of Encinita Avenue at Loma Avenue either for vehicles traveling on Longden Avenue, since vehicles traveling through the intersection have no stopping point, this tends to increase their travel speed. Per the Traffic Calming Master Plan at that time, the measured 85th percentile speeds on Longden Avenue exceeded the posted speed limit by more than 7 to 9 mph. 85th percentile speeds were reported in excess of 34 to 35 mph. Page 8 of 16 WB View of the Curve on Longden Avenue STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE FOR MINOR STREET' Design Speed (MPH) Sight Distance (Feet) 20 115 25* 155 30 200 35** 250 40 305 45 360 50 425 55 495 60 570 65 645 *25 MPH is the posted speed limit It the curve **35 MPH is the posted speed of traffic Stopping Sight Distance View from Encinita Avenue (NB)for vehicles making left, right, or driving through Longden Avenue Stopping Sight Distance Vlew from Encinita Avenue (SB) for vehicles making left, right, or driving through Longden Avenue Maintenance of adequate sight distance for drivers is important in avoiding both vehicle -vehicle and vehicle -pedestrian conflicts. The size of corner radii can have a marked effect on pedestrian and vehicle crossing distance, the distance between crossing pedestrians, and right/left turning vehicles as well as the speed of turning vehicles. There are currently ten driveways that experience the same line of sight issues, making it very difficult to back out of the driveways onto Longden Avenue. ' MUTCD, Table 6E-1 Stopping Sight Distance as a Function of Speed Page 9 of 16 The diagram below shows the Sight Distance measured from a stopped vehicle on Encinita Avenue to vehicles traveling on Longden Avenue. Driveways along the curve on Longden Avenue are identified with a red circle. Line of Sight Diagram Sight distance is provided at intersections to allow drivers to perceive the presence of potentially conflicting vehicles. Motorists should be able to see another motorist in order to adjust their speed to stop in order to avoid a collision at an intersection. The driver of a vehicle approaching an uncontrolled intersection as well as a driver stopped at an intersection should have an unobstructed view of the entire intersection to permit a driver to avoid a potential collision, this is referred to as sight distance. with a speed limit post of 25 mph on Longden Avenue near Oak Avenue Encinita Avenue at Longden Avenue Page 10 of 16 Existing Curve on Longden Avenue approaching Encinito Avenue EXISTING CONDITIONS DIAGRAM approaching Oak Avenue (Longden Elementary school) Posted regulatory warning sign of upcoming curvature with speed limit of 2S mph on Longden Avenue near Oak Avenue The diagram below shows existing conditions at the subject intersection including signage and street widths. e Existing Conditions Diagram ih school limit sign Page 11 of 16 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC APPROACH COUNTS 24 Hour automatic traffic counter machines and tubes were placed on each approach of the Encinita Avenue/Longden Avenue intersection on ThursdayJune 5, 2014 while school was still in session. The daily total count of vehicles were used in determining minimum volumes thresholds for possible all -way stop control at the intersection. TABLE 1: TUBE COUNTS — ENCINITA AVENUE AT LONGDEN AVENUE APPROACH COUNTS NB Approach (Encinita Avenue): 1,175 SB Approach (Encinita Avenue): 652 I EB Approach (Longden Avenue): 3,599 WB Approach (Longden Avenue): 3,547 Total ADT Entering Intersection: 8,973 The following summarizes the vehicle counts during the highest 8 hours of a given day. This is used to determine if minimum vehicular volume thresholds are exceeded for the installation of all -way stop control. TABLE 2: VEHICLE COUNTS DURING THE HIGHEST 8 HOURS OF A GIVEN DAY Longden Avenue Encinita Avenue (Major Street — Avg 300 vph*) (Minor Street -Avg 200 units ph**) Time Ped/Bike Met Vol. (Highest 8 NB SB Vol EB WB Total E+W Total N+S Warrant? Hours) Approac Approac Crossing Approach Approach Approach Approach h h Longden Ave 206 249 Yes 119 64 13 196 I 231 333 Yes 129 I 112 10 251 179 176 Yes 55 31 86 262 225 Yes 109 39 6 154 NO YES NO NO 7:00-8:00 8:00-9:00 12:00-13:00 14:00-15:00 349 288 Yes 84 77 161 315 226 Yes 72 42 7 121 NO NO 15:00-16:00 16:00-17:00 394 300 Yes 105 49 5 159 331 280 Yes 103 38 141 Vph: vehicles per hour NO NO 17:00-18:00 18:00-19:00 * ** Units ph: units per hour exiting from either direction of the minor street. (Threshold includes vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians) Page 12 of 16 EXISTING INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT To determine the directional flow of traffic at the intersection a manual turning movement count was taken during typical peak commute and school hours of 7:00 to 9:00 am, 1:00 to 3:00 pm and 4:00 to 6:00 pm on a typical weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday). The count was conducted on Thursday June 5, 2014, when school was still in session. FIGURE 2: Turning Movement Counts AM Peak Hour Counts Encinita Ave and Longden Ave 53 60 12 k� 17 �4 302 29 iAt 36� 204 —� 30 26 81 41 ACCIDENT DATA FIGURE 3: Turning Movement Counts AFT Peak Hour Counts Encinita Ave and Longden Ave 15 172 11 138 20 �9 185 �18 1t (* 32 46 28 FIGURE 4: Turning Movement Counts PM Peak Hour Counts Encinita Ave and Longden Ave 20 15 9 6 236 or 17 r16 342 `\ 30� l 3337 34 Accident data was obtained from the computerized accident records system maintained by the State of California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). As seen in the following summary, one accident occurred in the past 5 years between 2013 and 2009. One (1) accident occurred in the last 12 month period 2013: 1 recorded accident 2012: No recorded accidents 2011: 1 recorded accident 2010: No recorded accidents 2009: No recorded accidents Collision No. Date Location Dist. Time Day Type Severity Description 2013: One (1) Accident 1 01/11/2013 Encinita/Longden 1 17:30 Tue Broadside INJ SBThru Veh Hit WB Thru Veh 2012 No Accidents 2011: One (1) Accident Page 13 of 16 1 07/09/2011 Encinita/Longden I 12:07 Sat Broadside [NJ SB Thru Veh Hit EB Thru Veh 2010: No Accidents 2009: No Accidents CRITERIA FOR PLACEMENT OF ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL (WARRANTS AND ANALYSIS) The criteria for placement of all -way stop control are set by the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). The placement of All -Way stop control is warranted when': • Traffic control signals are justified • A crash problem exists as indicated by 5 or more accidents in a 12 -month Deriod • Minimum Volumes are met: • Volume entering intersection from the major approach'(total of both approaches) averages 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day. And • The combined vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle volumes entering the intersection from the minor street approaches averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours. • If the 85`' percentile approach speed of the major -street exceeds 40 mph the minimum volumes are 70 percent of the above values. Other'criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: • The need to control left turn conflict • The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations generating high pedestrian volumes • Locations where a road user, after stopping cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to safely negotiate the intersection unless conflicting traffic is also required to stop. • An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multiway stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. The City of Temple City follows State policies and the California Vehicle Code. The state manual covers all aspects of the placement, construction and maintenance of every form of approved traffic control. The guidelines prescribe five basic requirements for all devices. They must: • Fulfill a need • Command attention • Convey a clear and simple meaning • Command respect of road users • Give adequate time for proper response California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Section 28.07 Multiway Stop Applications page 2B-7 Page 14 of 16 CRITERIA FOR PLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL (WARRANTS AND ANALYSIS) CAMUTCD Section 4C.01 Studies and Factors for Justifying Traffic Control Signals: When determining if a location or intersection should be signalized, an engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian characteristics, and physical characteristics of the location shall be performed to determine whether installation of a traffic control signal is justified. The investigation of the need for a traffic control signal includes an analysis of factors related to the existing operation and safety at the study location and the potential to improve these conditions, as well as the applicable factors contained in the following traffic signal warrants: • Warrant 1, Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume • Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume • Warrant 3, Peak Hour • Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume • Warrant 5, School Crossing • Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System • Warrant 7, Crash Experience • Warrant 8, Roadway Network The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. A traffic control signal should not be installed unless an engineering study indicates that installing a traffic control signal will improve the overall safety and/or operation of the intersection. A traffic control signal should not be installed if it will seriously disrupt progressive traffic (CAMUTCDSection 4C.01). Based on Traffic Counts on Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue, Traffic Signal Warrants were analyzed. Please refer to Appendix Section 3 Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets. No warrants were 100% met for the installation of a traffic signal. The Traffic Signal Warrants used forthe subject intersection are perthe California MUTCD 2012 Edition Chapter 4C, Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies, Part 4, Highway Traffic Signals are included as part of Appendix Section 3. RECOMMENDATIONS After careful review of existing roadway conditions and operations, staff has determined that the, intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue justifies the installation of all -way stop control. Due to reduced sight visibility for turning vehicles, crossing pedestrians, and backing cars it is recommended! that an all -way stop be installed at this location. The California Vehicle Code (CVC) sections 21100.1, 21400 and 21351 gives local authorities the right to place/maintain traffic signs, signals and other traffic control devices on local streets as long as they Page 15 of 16 conform to Uniform Standards of Traffic Control Devices as determined by the Department of Transportation. Based on these, along with an engineering review and study, the installation of an all -way stop is justified and will enhance operations and safety as well as provide acceptable gaps in traffic for vehicles to make left turns into and out of the intersection of Longden Avenue and Encinita Avenue. To enhance operations the following measures should be implemented along with signage installation (See proposed diagram) in two phases: PHASE 1: • Advanced Signage (Stop Ahead Signage) • Pavement legends • Curve Warning Signs • Updated Speed limit Signs • Highly reflective paint and neon green school signs PHASE 2: After construction is finished on Longden Avenue and the proposed all -way stop is installed per Phase 1, it is recommended that a field survey with speed samples measuring the 851" (%) percentile speed of traffic is completed. This should be done in September, or a period at least 2-3 months after any improvements are installed when school traffic on Longden Avenue can be captured to determine if the existing posted speed limits should be reevaluated and if additional measures should be implemented. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS DIAGRAM Recommended Improvements Diagram Page 16 of 16 Appendix Section Appendix Section Appendix Section Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts . .. Peak Hour Vehicle and Pedestrian Counts Appendix Section 3................................................................................ Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Appendix Section 1: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts Preanal by Has/Aro VOLUME Encinita Ave & Longden Ave Day: Thursday Date: 6/5/2014 Page 1 o! 1 City: Temple City Prosed #: CA14 5380_001 00:00 1 07:45 4 WAS 6 PM Peak Hour 5 14:45 16 12:15 12:00 16 174 12 - 280 34 916 47 124 109 419 00:15 4 Pk Hr Factor 0 0.686 4 0.748 8 Pk Hr factor 16 0.648 12:15 8 0.948 7 248 59 437 48 1443 122 177 00:30 2 526 0 7-9 Peak Hour 4 07:45 3 07:45 9 4-6 Peak Hour 12:30 20 17.0 6 3]:00 42 2]4 41 280 109 916 4 -6 Pk Volume 1 8 394 4 848 16 0.837 17 3 45 0.705 Pk Hr Farior 55 7 31 53 179 33 176 441 0WAS 1:00 0 0 1 2 13:00 81 1p7 01:15 1 0 3 2 6 13:15 8 8 46 34 96 01:30 0 0 2 0 2 13:30 16 13 49 46 124 0?•4jj n 1 01 ] 7 5 1i 50 4 32 3J 1R5 61 154 IQ 421 02:0088 0 a 2 3 4:00 16 S i6 36 02:15 0 0 1 2 3 14:15 16 6 54 41 117 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 31 5 70 52 158 02:45 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 5 33 9 14:45 46 109 15 39 87 262 76 225 2J4 635 03:00 1 0 1 1 3 15:00 31 32 94 80 Z'37 03:15 0 0 1 0 1 15:15 15 22 87 69 193 03:30 1 0 2 0 3 15:30 22 14 81 74 191 03:45 0 2 1 1 1 5 1 2 10 15:45 16 84 9 77 87 349 65 288 j7,j 798 04:00 1 1 2 2 16:00 16 14 72 61 04:15 3 0 0 2 5 16:15 27 8 79 49 163 04:30 0 1 1 0 2 16:30 15 8 80 59 162 04:45 1 5 0 2 3 6 2 6 [+ 19 16:45 14 72 12 42 84 315 57 226 JW 655 05:00 2 1 2 4 g 17:00 20 7 81 64 iii 05:15 2 0 1 4 7 17:15 20 8 102 80 210 05:30 2 1 4 5 12 17:30 30 11 114 84 239 05:45 4 10 1 3 10 17 17 30��? 60 17:45 35 105 23 49 97 394 72 300 27 848 06:00 3 3 5 i5 N 18:00 22 11 106 91 30 06:15 5 3 10 16 34 18:15 33 5 75 68 181 06:30 11 4 13 22 5j0� 18:30 28 11 88 64 191 is 31 9 18 17 45 36 89 189 103 280 11 38 520 331 63 15p 152 006:45 7:00 29 60 71 1i 19:00 10 07:15 18 13 29 61 1221 19:15 14 1 65 56 136 07:30 25 7 38 49 119 19:30 11 7 53 39 110 WAS 47 119 27 64 79 206 68 249 jj 638 19:45 10 52 4 23 Al 199 44 202 j 476 08:00 52 47 110 1165 20:00 11 3 51 33 JS 08:15 50 43 53 103 249 20:15 10 5 43 40 98 08:30 17 12 32 60 121 20:30 9 7 38 33 87 08:45 30 129 10 112 36 231 54 333 17 ROS 20:45 11 41 5 20 42 174 51 157 109 392 09:00 30 4 37 57 21:00 8 5 31 42 86 09:15 10 7 37 49 103 21:15 4 3 30 29 66 09:30 10 3 34 52 99 2190 5 2 22 31 60 09:45 10 40 7 21 34 142 56 214 417 �l`45 5 24 5 15 32 103 179 119 Q9 261 10:00 15 9 31 56 107 i 58 10:15 14 6 33 50 103 22:15 7 1 27 19 54 10:30 8 5 36 36 85 22:30 2 3 15 11 31 10:45 15 52 5 25 34 134 47 189 400 22:45 4 18 2 8 16 90 13 62 35 178 11:00 12 5 37 50 @ l04 23:00 0 1 19 30 30 11:15 16 6 43 45 110 23:15 3 0 5 8 16 11:30 13 7 53 47 120 23:30 4 3 4 11 22 11:45 10 51 3 21 43 176 40 182 96 430 23:45 0 7 2 6 3 31 8 37 13 81 r TOTALS 1 455 272 987 1321 1 3035 1 TOTALS 1 720 380 2612 2226 1 5938 SPLIT% 35.0% 9.0% 325% 43.5% 33.8% SPLIT% 12.1% 6.4% 44.0% 37.5% 66.2% AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:45 07:30 WAS 07:45 PM Peak Hour 14:15 14:45 17:15 12:15 27:15 AM Pk Volume 174 129 280 347 916 PM Pk Volume 124 83 419 327 906 Pk Hr Factor 0.837 0.686 0.636 0.748 0.705 Pk Hr factor 0.674 0.648 0.919 0.898 0.948 7-9 Volume 248 176 437 582 1443 4-6 Volume 1 177 91 709 526 1503 7-9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:45 07:30 07:45 07:45 4-6 Peak Hour 17:00 17:00 17.0 17:00 3]:00 ] 9 Pk Volume 2]4 129 280 347 916 4 -6 Pk Volume 105 49 394 300 848 Pk Hr FaRor 0.837 0.686 0.636 0]48 0.705 Pk Hr Farior 0.750 0.533 0.864 0.893 0.887 Appendix Section 2: Peak Hour Vehicle and Pedestrian Counts CALCULATED PFAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM 53 8o 12 Page 1 of 1 Tu ng Movement CauK SR ST SL TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ST SL Preoareaby GE Traffic Surveys 17 PROJECT NAME TBInde Ch WR 204 ET 07A541645 WT 302 ET WT 30 ER WL 29 ER PROJECT NO 14212 WL NL NT NR NL NT NR 25 81 41 DATE: Thunway June 5, 2014 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -NOON ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -NOON 15 17 2 SR ST SL 1 NS STREET: EmInite Avenue SR ST SL E -W STREET Lan06en Avenue 11 EL WR 9 EL TIME I NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 185 ET NS EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 20 ER WL E -W ER PED COUNT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT — LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL NL SL 1 EL WL ePDO-07:15 /I 7I 181 B 2 7 AM 8 48 1B 421 2 3I 61 2 126 SR 7 SL 07]5-07'30 41 91 3 8 3 9 28 9 181 1 111 61 90 2 11 30 ER WL 107:30-07.45 61 141 5 0 3 WL 4 321 2 321 a 31 39 2 84 1 1 4 10745-08:00 41 211 12 3 13 8 611 12 571 7 41 64 2 146 1 101 2 10890-08:15 41 27L 19 6 201 21 971 18 781 9 9� 97 a 217 1 11 5 1 108:15-09:30 141 261 7 2 211 2C 901 5 431 11 141 82 7 162 3 21 2 1 106:30-08:45 41 71 3 1 81 4 251 1 26 3 21 59 2 93 21 41 1 1WAS09:00 31 41 3 21 31 4 191 2 33 3 31 43 _ 89 1 1 113:00-13:15 4 3 2 2 5 16 3 44 8 1 30 as 3 2 1131! 41 1 2 1 2 3 13 4 39 1 2 31 1 78 1 1 1 113:30.13:457I 3 5 3 3 7 28 2 41 3 01 39 85 113:45.14'00 4 8 3 1 1 3 20 3 28 2 11 36 2 72 114:00.14:15 9 5 3 1 4 6 28 5 36 8 51 49 C 103 3 2 3 1 114:15-14 W 7 6 3 3 3 22 2 39 7 31 35 2 86 2 114:30.14.45 121 12 8 4 1 35 4 63 5 2 43 3 120 3 2 114.45-15:00 41 23 16 1 6 5 55 81 68 4 70 7 9 1 1600-16:15 6 81 3 1 5 9 32 6 64 4 3 52 2 131 1 2 2 11615-1630 14 6 6 1 1 4 32 2 63 3 4 30 3 105 2 1 2 11630-16.45 7 4 4 1 1 24 3 66 8 2 51 1 131 2 1 116:45.17.00 8 4 2 2 3 7 26 1 73 6 1 45 2 128 4 6 2 117:00.1715 6 8 5 1 2 4 26 3 73 7 3 42 2 130 1 1 17:15.1730 11 8 4 1, 1 3 28 3 96 3 5 70 1 178 2 1 117.3 8 8 13 3 6 4 42 4 94 12 3 63 2 178 5 4 2 3 1 17.45.18'00 8 13 12, 4 6 9 52 6 79 8 6 61 1 161 2 PEAK -HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS CALCULATED PFAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM 53 8o 12 _ SR ST SL SR ST SL 36 EL WR 17 EL WR 204 ET 07A541645 WT 302 ET WT 30 ER WL 29 ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR 25 81 41 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -NOON ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -NOON 15 17 2 SR ST SL SR ST SL 11 EL WR 9 EL WR 138 ET 14:00.15:00 WT 185 ET WT 20 ER WL 18 ER WL _ NL INT NR NL NT NR 32 46 28 rAI CI ILATED PEAK HOUR VDLUMES-PM AOI CT D AK HO IR VO IM AM 2D 15 9 _ SR ST SL SR ST SL 16 EL WR 8 EL WR 342 ET 1700-18.00 WT 235 ET VJT 30 ER WL 17 ER WL RL NT NR NL NT NR 33 37 34 Appendix Section 3: Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Pagel of 8 Based on Traffic Counts on Longden Avenue and Encinta Avenue, Traffic Signal Warrants were analyzed. No warrants were 100% met for the installation of a traffic signal. The Traffic Signal Warrants used for the subject intersection are per the California MUTCD 2012 Edition Chapter 4C, Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies, Part 4, Highway Traffic Signals are included as part of the Appendix. M 400 MINOR STREET 300 HIGHER - VOLUME APPROACH- zoo VPH 100 Longden Avenue at Encinita Avenue Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume 300 400 500 IS��t91: 700 800 900 1000 1100 1, 694 TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— LES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane. 115' 80, Appendix Section 3: Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Paget of 8 Longden Avenue at Encinita Avenue Longden Avenue at Encinita Avenue N/A - Figure 4C-5. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Four -Hour Volume 500 400 TOTAL OF ALL PEDESTRIANS 300 CROSSING MAJOR STREET - PEDESTRIANS 200 PER HOUR (PPH) 100 Nl 7 600 1000 1100 1200 TREET I F BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES HOUR (VPH) 107 pph applies as the lower threshold volume. 107' Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour soo I \ 500 \ 2 OR MORE LANES 6 2i R Mi RE i NES MINOR400 �. r HSTREET IGHER- \ 2 OR MORE LANES 8 1 LANE VOLUME Sao HANE 1 E APPROACH- VPH Zoo 110 150- 100 I n } I I 1100 400 500 600 700 900 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 ism 6J4 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. Longden Avenue at Encinita Avenue N/A - Figure 4C-5. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Four -Hour Volume 500 400 TOTAL OF ALL PEDESTRIANS 300 CROSSING MAJOR STREET - PEDESTRIANS 200 PER HOUR (PPH) 100 Nl 7 600 1000 1100 1200 TREET I F BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES HOUR (VPH) 107 pph applies as the lower threshold volume. 107' Appendix Section 3: Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Page3 of 8 Longden Avenue at Encinita Avenue N/A - Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Hour 700 600 `� TOTAL OF ALL soo PEDESTRIANS CROSSING 40D k. MAJOR STREET - PEDESTRIANS PER HOUR (PPH) 00 -� 133 100 300 400 500 600 700 900 900 1000 110D 1 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1600 M Ef—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- -qqPER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 133 pph a e lower threshold volume. Appendix Section 3: Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 1 of 5) COUNT DATG CALC DATE DIST CO RTE PM CHK DATA Map, St Longden Avenue Critical Approach Speed 35 mph MIS S� Eremite Avenue Critical Approach Speed 30 mph Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic > 40 mph _..... _. _...... _. Of ❑ } RURAL (R) In buih up area of isolated community of < 10.000 population _.. ❑ J ❑ URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ED (Condition A or Condltion B or combination of A and B must be satisfied) Condition A - Minimum Vehicle Volume 100% SATISFIED YES ❑ NO 91 110% SATISFIED YES ❑ NO aF qaF 9F r79 'Y1b455 564 355 1 487 637 69a 611132 139 55 115 B4 110 103 Paoe4 of E Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS NO El (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U I R_ U I R APPROACH 1 tar More LANES Bah Approaches /600 350 600 420 YW Sbeer Ht:at AOproxh `(400 (260) 105 (460) (3361 200 140 a Sbeet CI 11201 (64) (160) (112) 100% SATISFIED YES ❑ NO 91 110% SATISFIED YES ❑ NO aF qaF 9F r79 'Y1b455 564 355 1 487 637 69a 611132 139 55 115 B4 110 103 Paoe4 of E Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES ❑ NO El MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES ❑ NO (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U I R U I R APPROACH "+ 1 2 or More ^�tir487 r A br6l INBON 3 0'K �O� Svrxt 750 600 525 900 (420) (720) 630 15041Hg 455 r564 355 637 541 694Mayr rLANES hestApproach 75 53 100 70 132 55 84 79 110 Mna Streal (601 N21 - (60) (56) Combination of Conditions A & B SATISFIED YES ❑ NO REQUIREMENT I CONDITION J FULFILLED TWO CONDITIONS A. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME 80% Yes ❑ No SATISFIED 80% I AND, B. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ✓ CAUSE LESSADEQUATE DELAY AND 1 CONVEN ENCE TO ALTERNATIVES T TRAFFIC HAS FAILED COULD D Yes © No ❑ TO SOLVE THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS The satisfact on of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation Of a traffic control stgnal Appendix Section 3: Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Paoe5 o` e Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 2 of 5) WARRANT 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED' YES ❑ NO El Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an average day. 20, aF QF F APPROACH LANES One More v �9 y g Hour Both Approaches - Major Street v ',64 1 637 1 694 1 611 Higher Approach - Minor Street V 139 94 110 103 All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1. (URBAN AREAS) I Yes ❑ No ❑ QE, All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-2. (RURAL AREAS) Yes ❑ No ❑ WARRANT 3 - Peak Hour SATISFIED YES ❑ NO p (Part A or Part B must be satisfied) PART A SATISFIED YES ❑ NO El (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same one hour, for any four consecutive 16 -minute periods) 1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle -hours for a one -lane Yes ❑ No approach, or five vehicle -hours for a two-lane approach, AM 60 x 4 = 240 .--------------------------------------------------------------- 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds Yes ® NO ❑ 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AdQ .--------------------------------------------------------------- 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 600 vph Yes ® NO ❑ for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. PART B SATISFIED YES ❑ NO F APPROACH LANES One More 4-H e our Both Approaches - Major Street 6941 Higher Approachr ch - Minor Street I 1110 The plotted point falls above the apphwble curve in Figure 4C-3. (URBAN AREAS) Yes ❑ No ❑ �R, The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C41. (RURAL AREAS) Yes ❑ No ❑ The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Appendix Section 3: Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 3 o/ 5) WARRANT 4 - Pedestrian Volume NO ❑ Otter YES ❑ A1,209w NO ❑ (Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisfied) No ❑ 6/ Part 1 (Parts A or B must be satisfiedh ,y0 --A Hours --- A I Vehicles Per hour forI 455 564 4111 any 4 hours I I 1541 Pedestrians per hour for 13 10 6 7 any 4 hours Hours - - -- B Vehicles per hour for any t hour Pedestrians per hour for any 1 hour 455 13 II SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ Figure 4C-5 or Figure 4C-6 SATISFIED YES ❑ NO Figure 4C-7 or Figure 4C-8 SATISFIED YES ❑ NO El Part 2 SATISFIED YES El NO ❑ ANDJThe fldistance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater 360' I Yes D No Elthan Q$, The proposed traffic signal wt; not restnct progressive traffic lbw along the malor street Yes ❑ No ❑ WARRANT 5 - School Crossing (Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) N/A -- Part A Gap/Minutes and 0 of Children Gaps Minutes U s Mmuies Num f ua scbool Age Pedestrians V ANQ. Consideration has§een gwW less SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ Hour I I Gaps IlImIts YES ❑ NO ❑ Otter YES ❑ A1,209w NO ❑ remedial maures. I Yes ❑ No ❑ Part B SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater I Yes © No ❑ than 300 fl QR, The proposed signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic . I Yes 0 No ❑ The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. FaprC, cf', Appendix Section 3: Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Paae7 of p, Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 4 of S) WARRANT 6 - Coordinated Signal System SATISFIED YES ❑ NO El (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS I DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL > 1000 It I N A, S fl. E 360' fl. W h Yes C] No0 On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly In one direction. the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platoomng -- Yes[] No© Q$. 07; !coo-way street. adjacent Irafflc control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation WARRANT 7 - Crash Experience Warrant SATISFIED YES ❑ NO (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to Yes ❑ NO[] reduce the crash frequency REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period susceptible to correction by a traffic signal. and involving injury Yes ❑ NO ❑ or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash --------------------------------------------------- 5 OR MORE 1 in 1013 REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS ✓ Warrant 1, Condition A - 80% Minimum Vehicular Volume ONE CONDITION I QB. Warrant 1, Condition B - 80% Yes ❑ No❑ SATISFIED 80% Interruption of Continuous Traffic QR, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition Ped Vol > 152 for any hour No Q$, Ped Vol > 80 for any 4 hours WARRANT 8 - Roadway Network SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES-ALLAPPROACHES FULFILLED REQUIREMENTS Dunng Typical Weekday Peak Hour 849 VehlHr and has 5 -year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 2. and 3 during an average weekday 1000 VeNHr . — — — — — — Yes ❑ NOE] OR During Each of Any 5 Hrsof a Sat. or Sun Veh/Hr CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES KWOR MAJOR ROUTE A ROUTE B Hwy. System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic _---------------------------------- Rural or Suburban W hvra Outside Of. Enten or Travers) a Coy -----$—Y----------�-------------- Appears as Major Route on an Official Plan Any Major Route Characteristics Met. Both Streets Yes ❑ NOE] The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the Installation of a traffic control signal Appendix Section 3: Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets Page8 of 8 Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 5 of 5) N/A WARRANT 9 - Intersection Near a Grade Crossing SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ (Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) PART A A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the Yes ❑ No ❑ center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the slop line or yield line on the approach. Track Center Line to Limit Line PART B There is one minor street approach lane at the track cTthepoint ghest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crosss above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9. Major Street - Total of both approaches: VPH Minor Street -Crosses the track (one directio approaching the intersection) VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3. & 4 be calculate AF) = VPH ------------------ __---_--_--__ Yes❑ No[] �, There are two or more minor street approach at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail lr as the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4 Major Street - Total of both apprc Minor Street - Crosses the track VPH X AF (Use Tables The minor street approach volume n2XkjjgWW as described in Section 4C.10. 1- Number of Rail Traffic per D 2- Percentage of High -Occupancy Buses 3- Percentage of Tractor -Trailer Trucks on Minor _VPH 1W only, approaching the intersection): mow to calcualte AF) = VPH three following adjustment factors (AF) NOTE If no data is availale or known, then use AF = 1 (no adjustment) Adjustment factor from table 4C-2_ Adjustment factor from table 4C-3 Adjustment factor from table 4C-4_