The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutGI Pilot Final Report - Appendix AA-EEAPPENDIX AA CSO GI PROGRAM HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC MODELING Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CSO Volume Reduction Green Infrastructure Program – Appendix AA Page 1 Revised December 21, 2015 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC MODELING OF THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM One significant purpose and outcome of the Green Infrastructure (GI) Pilot Program is to develop a technique to connect green infrastructure to the CSO collection system model. The method developed by MSD, and outlined here, connects GI performance to runoff depth through a volume conservation argument and then defines a relationship between runoff depth and CSO discharge volume through the impervious area model parameter in the collection system model. GI Performance and Runoff Depth Runoff depth is the volume of water per unit drainage area available from precipitation after all other abstractions such as infiltration, evaporation, and surface storage. Runoff is the water which flows in the gutters and other conveyances of a drainage system until it is intercepted and collected in the sewer. Figure 1 provides a diagram of the conceptual model which links GI to runoff depth and is used to derive the expression for equivalent runoff depth. Figure 1: Conceptual Model Linking GI and Runoff Depth Managed Area Unmanaged Area Volume = Rd*Au Au = Unmanaged Area Am = Managed Area Rd = Runoff Depth P = Fraction Volume Reduction by GI Volume = Rd*Am Volume = Rd*Am*(1-P) Volume = Rd*Am*P Soil InfiltrationSewer System Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CSO Volume Reduction Green Infrastructure Program – Appendix AA Page 2 Revised December 21, 2015 Using the definition of runoff depth as the volume per unit drainage area that is available after all abstractions, an equivalent runoff depth can be derived according to the diagram in Figure 1. The equivalent runoff depth placed over the drainage area produces the same runoff volume in the sewer system as the sum of volumes coming off of the unmanaged area and outflowing from the GI practice in Figure 1, and is computed as shown in Equation 1 where 𝑅𝑑 is equivalent runoff and other variables as defined in Figure 1. 𝑅𝑑=𝑅𝑑∗(𝐴𝑢+(1−𝑃)∗𝐴𝑚) 𝐴𝑢+𝐴𝑚=𝑅𝑑−𝑅𝑑∗𝑃∗𝐴𝑚 𝐴𝑢+𝐴𝑚 Equation 1 MSD conducted a monitoring study of various GI practices within the GI Program Area and found that for planning purposes the fractional volume reduction for GI should be 0.7. Runoff Depth, Impervious Area, and CSO Discharge Volume The conceptual model developed with Equation 1 permits the computation of an effective of equivalent runoff depth based upon GI performance, but provides little insight on how to relate GI performance to CSO discharge volume. MSD determined that the most effective way to relate the two is through hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. The concept is to develop a coupled hydrologic and hydraulic model which through defined changes in a model parameter representing impervious surface can produce the calculated equivalent runoff and in turn the CSO discharge volume for that runoff. MSD used an XP-SWMM model developed for the Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Long Term Control Plan (LTCP) for the analysis. The model represents the actual geometric data and hydrologic parameters at the time of calibration in 2006 and represents a current and comprehensive model of the collection system. The first step in the process was for MSD to develop a relationship between runoff depth and impervious drainage area for the typical year. The relationship would then allow the computation of an effective imperious area reduction required to cause the model to produce the desired equivalent runoff. The relationship was created by systematic numerical simulations with the model. Each CSO subcatchment in the hydrologic network had the percent of impervious land use parameter incrementally reduced in 10% increments from 100% to 70% of the baseline value used in the LTCP. An example of the impervious land use parameter for one particular model node used in the simulations is presented in Table 1. Percent of Baseline for Simulation Percent of Impervious Land Use Parameter for Model Subcatchment: 16J3-045S 100% 25% 90% 22.5% 80% 20% 70% 17.5% Table 1: Example of the % Impervious Reduction Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CSO Volume Reduction Green Infrastructure Program – Appendix AA Page 3 Revised December 21, 2015 The model results were aggregated based upon CSO drainage areas which are both hydraulically and hydrologically independent. Several CSO systems in the model are interconnected and were therefore aggregated together and analyzed as one drainage area with multiple outfalls. An example of one such system is illustrated in Figure 2. In addition to separating the analysis between independent CSO drainage areas, the results were also aggregated on a service area wide basis for the Bissell Point combined sewers outfalling to the Mississippi River to provide an average relationship not dependent on location. The results for the simulations provide the basis for relationships among impervious land use, typical year runoff depth, and typical year CSO discharge volume as demonstrated in Figures 3, 4, and 5 for the total service area. Figure 2: Interconnected Bissel Point CSOs 048 and 049 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CSO Volume Reduction Green Infrastructure Program – Appendix AA Page 4 Revised December 21, 2015 Figure 3: Relationship Between Impervious Land Use and Typical Year Runoff Depth Figure 4: Relationship Between Impervious Land Use and Typical Year CSO Discharge Volume 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Typical Year Runoff Depth (inches) Percent Reduction in Impervious Land Use Bissell Point Service Area, 25224 AC 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800 6000 6200 6400 6600 6800 7000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Typical Year CSO Volume (Million Gallons) Percent Reduction in Impervious Land Use Bissell Point Service Area, 25224 AC Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CSO Volume Reduction Green Infrastructure Program – Appendix AA Page 5 Revised December 21, 2015 Figure 5: Relationship Between Typical Year Runoff Depth and Typical Year CSO Discharge Volume Similar for each CSO drainage area, the relationships derived were nearly linear as shown in Figures 3-5. The linear relationship in the collection systems model greatly simplified the method for predicting CSO discharge volume reduction as a function of area managed by GI practices. Using linear regression for each of the CSO drainage areas, Equation 2 and Equation 3 were derived to relate both runoff depth and CSO discharge volume during the typical year to the impervious land use parameter. 𝑅 =𝑅𝑑− 𝑀 ∗ 𝐼 Equation 2 𝐶 = 𝐶𝑜− 𝐾 ∗ 𝐼 Equation 3 Where 𝑅 is modeled runoff depth, 𝑅𝑑 is runoff depth at the baseline (original LTCP model), 𝑀 is the slope of the runoff-impervious land use relationship (Figure 3), 𝐶 is the modeled CSO discharge volume, 𝐶𝑜 is the baseline CSO discharge volume, 𝐾 is the slope of the CSO discharge volume-impervious land use relationship (Figure 4), and 𝐼 is the percent reduction in impervious land use parameter. It is desired to create a relationship also between runoff depth and CSO discharge volume reduction,𝑉𝑟. This is accomplished first by recognizing 𝑉𝑟 is defined as the difference between baseline CSO discharge volume and the modeled CSO discharge volume. Then Equation 3 is rearranged as a function of CSO discharge volume reduction and Equation 2 is rearranged to solve for 𝐼 and substituted into Equation 3 as Equation 4. 𝑉𝑟= −𝐾 𝑀∗ (𝑅 −𝑅𝑑) Equation 4 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800 6000 6200 6400 6600 6800 7000 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16Typical Year CSO Volume (Million Gallons) Typical Year Runoff Depth (inches) Bissell Point Service Area, 25224 AC Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CSO Volume Reduction Green Infrastructure Program – Appendix AA Page 6 Revised December 21, 2015 Table 3 provides the computed slopes𝑀, 𝐾, and 𝐾 𝑀 for each of the CSO drainage regions defined by CSO outfall in Table 2. Table 2: CSO Regions and CSO Outfalls The basis for connecting area managed by GI practice to CSO discharge volume reduction is provided by recognizing that Equation 2 allows the model to produce the equivalent runoff depth defined in Equation 1, and so substituting Equation 1 into Equation 4 links GI area managed to CSO discharge through runoff reduction as shown in Equation 5. 𝑉𝑟= −𝐾 𝑀∗(𝑅𝑑−𝑅𝑑)= (𝐾 𝑀∗𝑅𝑑∗𝑃 𝐴) ∗𝐴𝑚= 𝜀 ∗𝐴𝑚 Equation 5 Where 𝐴 is the total area (𝐴𝑢+𝐴𝑚) of the particular CSO region, and 𝜀 is the CSO discharge volume reduced in million gallons per acre managed by GI practice. For the purposes of MSD’s GI Program, 𝑃 is taken as 0.7. Table 4 provides the value of 𝜀 computed for each CSO region per Equation 5. CSO Region CSO Outfalls Typical Year CSO Discharge Volume (MG) Baseline Central BP-011, BP-012, BP-013, BP-014, BP-015, BP-016, BP-017, BP-018, BP-019, BP-020, BP-021 3093 Gimblin BP-050 62 Southern Arsenal BP-003, BP-004, BP-006 573 Utah BP-005 60 Louisa, Trudeau, Barton BP-007, BP-008, BP-009, BP-010 147 Bissell Point Service Area All Mississippi River CSOs 6950 Dakota BP-002, BP-057 56 Rocky Branch, Salisbury BP-037, BP-038, BP-040, BP-041, BP-042 609 Harlem Creek BP-047 1118 Humboldt, Baden BP-048, BP-049 970 Ferry BP-043, BP-044 71 Prairie BP-045, BP-046 43 Biddle, Chambers South Benton BP-22, BP-23, BP-24, BP-25, BP-26, BP-27, BP-028, BP- 029, BP-030, BP-031, BP- 032, BP-033, BP-034, BP- 035, BP-036, BP-61 147 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CSO Volume Reduction Green Infrastructure Program – Appendix AA Page 7 Revised December 21, 2015 CSO Region M K K/M Central 0.113 23.52 208.69 Gimblin 0.135 0.64 4.70 Southern Arsenal 0.143 6.03 42.11 Utah 0.133 0.67 5.04 Louisa, Trudeau, Barton 0.157 1.94 12.40 Bissell Point Service Area 0.102 54.57 537.02 Dakota 0.125 0.65 5.16 Rocky Branch, Salisbury 0.116 5.09 43.78 Harlem Creek 0.069 6.51 94.44 Humboldt, Baden 0.063 6.02 95.45 Ferry 0.119 0.89 7.51 Prairie 0.136 0.62 4.58 Biddle, Chambers South Benton 0.140 2.00 14.28 Table 3: Regression Slopes for Equations 2 and 3 CSO Region Rd (inches) A (Ac) ε (MG/Ac) Central 18.1 8323 0.320 Gimblin 14.1 173 0.271 Southern Arsenal 15.0 1785 0.250 Utah 14.1 203 0.247 Louisa, Trudeau, Barton 16.3 598 0.238 Bissell Point Service Area 15.4 25224 0.231 Dakota 13.0 227 0.208 Rocky Branch, Salisbury 17.7 2749 0.198 Harlem Creek 13.2 4747 0.186 Humboldt, Baden 11.8 4360 0.182 Ferry 13.6 535 0.135 Prairie 14.1 354 0.129 Biddle, Chambers South Benton 14.7 1171 0.126 Table 4: CSO Discharge Volume Reduced per Acre Managed by GI Interpretation of ε Equation 5 provides a convenient way to estimate the CSO discharge volume reduction for a given area managed by GI practices. The method accounts for the full dynamics of the collection systems model it is based upon, yet provides for rapid computation due to the linear relationships derived. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CSO Volume Reduction Green Infrastructure Program – Appendix AA Page 8 Revised December 21, 2015 One immediate and useful interpretation of ε is that it is the efficiency of GI practices in reducing CSO discharge volume within a particular CSO region. It is useful, especially in comparison with the value derived as an average over the total service area, to provide an estimate as to which areas may benefit from a prioritization strategy based upon hydraulic and hydrologic performance. It should be recognized in using Equation 5 that there are several assumptions made which must be accepted for it to be valid. Some of the assumptions are inherent in the collection systems model, and some are implicit in the method by which Equation 1 is connected to Equation 2. The assumptions inherent in the collection systems model which should be specifically highlighted here are that the model assumes that the runoff characteristics are homogenous over the entire CSO drainage area. This is a commonly made assumption within hydrologic models and given the size of the CSO drainage areas, the primarily urban land use, and the fact that we are interested in integrated values (annual total volumes); it is believed that the errors resulting are small. Furthermore, due to the model discretization it is not readily possible to isolate the influence of GI practices from one block to the next, and thus the benefits of GI are averaged over the CSO drainage area. The primary assumption to be recognized when connecting Equation 1 to Equation 2 in the manner shown is that we have assumed by reducing the annual runoff volume through changes in impervious area of the model, it is the same as reducing annual runoff, and more importantly event runoff through the use of GI. By reducing impervious area within the model, the model forces a larger portion of the precipitation in each rainfall event over the typical year to be subject to the processes of infiltration, evaporation and increased surface storage among other processes. These are believed to be the same processes which are promoted by the use of GI and thus would be represented by the same mathematical model as used in the collection systems model. Because the processes are the same, it is also expected that by using the integrated value of annual runoff volume as the basis for fitting the model parameter, impervious area, it is still able to account for the event dynamics of GI, i.e. during high intensity storms the average runoff reduction is less that during low intensity storms. As such, the error introduced by this assumption is believed to be small. APPENDIX BB EARLY ACTION PROGRAM – APPLICATION FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS, PRIORITY RANKING FORM, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY MSD, AND GRANTEE BMP EXPENSE FORM prOject ,-LcAar METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT 12350 MARKET STREET / ST. LOUIS, MO 63103.2555 I (314) 768-6200 I WWW.STLMSD.COM ( WWW.PROJECTCLEARSTL.ORG Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Project Clear — Rainscaping Program Early Action Projects Grant Program Application Form Project Title Contact Person Name of Organization Address City State Zip Code Telephone Number — Office Cell Email Address 1. Please describe the purpose of the project in 3 pages or less using Times New Roman 12 point font and provide information on the following items: • Describe the work that will be done using the MSD funding. • Identify the specific deliverables and the anticipated outcomes associated with the major project components. • Describe in detail the tasks and schedule for the project. Include milestones and timelines for accomplishing tasks for the project time period. • Explain how the project will reduce runoff volume and if it is ready for implementation. Include calculations using the MEP spreadsheets. • Include a copy of the site plan and a drainage area map. • Include why the project will work and, if applicable, what makes it innovative. • Describe the maintenance plan for the green infrastructure to ensure sustainability. • If applicable, explain how you will engage partners and other stakeholders in the project. • Five (5) bound hard copies shall be submitted. 2. Dollar amount requested Please attach a budget for the project, including matching funds, if applicable. If other funding will be used, list funding sources and note if those funds are secured. If they are not, describe the 1�' ��'1 likelihood of securing those funds. The following categories of cost must be tracked and reported on: engineering, soils assessment and/or restoration, legal costs associated with deed restrictions and/or easements, property acquisition, demolition, construction of green infrastructure, maintenance of green infrastructure (during the first five years of operation), public participation activities, and monitoring of green infrastructure and associated laboratory analyses. 3. List of project parameters Impervious area removed or redirected to BMP Runoff volume reduction Address of project Cityshed square feet cubic feet Applicant is a Municipality or Local Government Agency or Non -Profit or Private Entity (circle one) Green Infrastructure Technology Proposed Proposal contains a public education component Yes or No (circle one) Entity responsible for maintenance 4. Certification by applicant The applicant certifies that all information in this application, and all information furnished in support of the application is true and complete to the best of the applicant' s knowledge and belief. The applicant understands that the EPA and MDNR must approve the project before MSD can commit funds. Applicant Signature Print Name Date 1k'iE1'1 METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT i 2350 MARKETSTREFT ST LOUIS, MO63103-2555 ((314) 768-6200 I WWW.STLMSD.COM 1 WWW.PROIECTCLEARSTLORG Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Project Clear - Rainscaping Program Early Action Projects Grant Program Application Instructions August 1, 2014 Introduction and Background Information MSD's Long Term Control Plan (LTCP) outlines a green infrastructure, or Rainscaping, program as part of the selected long-term Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) controls. The overall goals of this green infrastructure program, as stated in the LTCP, are to "identify and implement projects and programs that will significantly reduce CSOs and provide additional environmental benefit," as well as reduce CSO overflow volumes to the Mississippi River. Rainscaping projects will redirect stormwater from reaching the combined sewer system by capturing and diverting it to locations where it is detained, infiltrated into the ground, evaporated, taken up by plants and transpired, or reused. MSD's Project Clear, the 23 year, $4.7 billion initiative to plan, design, and build system -wide improvements to address water quality and alleviate many wastewater concerns in the St. Louis region, includes $100 million in green infrastructure investments. The 23 years will be divided into an initial 5-year $3 million pilot program and a full-scale program for the remaining 18 years and $97 million. MSD anticipates a 5-year period for complete implementation and reporting on the pilot program. In general, work to be done to implement the full-scale Rainscaping program will be based on the green infrastructure plan. However, there may be projects that are identified by MSD and can be agreed upon as being high priority projects suitable for early implementation even before the green infrastructure plan is finalized and approved. When MSD identifies a project or a group of projects that it believes is appropriate for early implementation, the District will propose these projects as an early action project(s) by submitting a written proposal to the MDNR/EPA. The MDNR/EPA must approve the project(s) before MSD will proceed. While the core of MSD's Rainscaping pilot program will be stormwater retrofitting conducted in partnership with the City of St. Louis, MSD will continue to seek to build partnerships with other municipalities, schools, community development organizations, and private developers. The goal is to engage partners to identify joint opportunities to incorporate Rainscaping into ongoing programs and future redevelopment projects. Potential Eligible Project Elements The following list shows eligible project elements. Other elements related to the green infrastructure program may be eligible if they are in accordance with the program objectives. • Impervious area reduction • Porous pavement • Reinforced turf • Amended soils • Planter boxes • Bioretention/Rain gardens • Impervious area sheet flow to buffer • Rooftop disconnection to rain barrel • Rooftop disconnection to cistern: irrigation reuse • Rooftop disconnection (splash to grade) • Green roofs • Blue roofs • Green streets • Curb extensions/Street bumpouts • Educational Signage for Green Infrastructure • Other techniques as approved by MSD Eligible Recipients The following entities are eligible for financial partnering: • Municipalities and local government agencies • Schools • Non-profit organizations • Community development organizations • Business owners • Private developers Funding Considerations This is a reimbursement program. Grantees must have adequate funding available to cover all aspects of their green infrastructure project. MSD construction approval of the green infrastructure facility, including stabilization of the tributary area upstream of the green infrastructure facility, is required prior to reimbursement. MSD plans to spend approximately $5 million per year on the green infrastructure program. Some of the funds may be allocated to MSD projects, and it has not been determined how much funding will be available for the grant program. Allocations will be based on a priority ranking system. Projects that provide a funding match will receive a higher priority ranking. However, providing a match is not required. Costs that may be eligible for reimbursement by MSD include the following: engineering, soils assessment and/or restoration, legal costs associated with deed restrictions and/or easements, property acquisition, demolition, construction of greeninfrastructure, public participation activities, and monitoring of green infrastructure and associated laboratory analyses. Costs for maintenance of green infrastructure facilities are not eligible. Projects that are completed or have already started construction are not eligible. Required Activities Preference shall be given to projects that can manage at least 1.14 inches of stormwater rainfall from the contributing drainage area. A reduction of runoff volume must be demonstrated and supported with calculations. Applicants should reference the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) spreadsheet and calculation tool available at the MSD website stlmsd.com/what-we- do/stormwater-management/bmp-toolbox/calculation-and-report-preparation-tools. Upon approval, all projects chosen for financial assistance shall be submitted for review per the District's plan review process. The cost categories listed in the above paragraph plus maintenance cost for green infrastructure (during the first five years of operation) must be tracked and reported. Evaluation Criteria and Process General Evaluators from MSD will score projects based on the application information submitted by the applicants. Project ranking will be primarily based on their potential for anticipated reduction of CSO overflow volume. Eligible projects must be located upstream of a CSO outlet that discharges directly to the Mississippi River. Projects that are located downstream of the interceptor will not be eligible. Wherever opportunities exist for MSD to make informed choices between different properties available for stormwater retrofitting with green infrastructure, MSD will prioritize these projects based on their expected CSO reductions from previous hydrologic modeling. For example, properties in the Harlem, Baden, and Rocky Branch citysheds would receive a higher ranking than those in the Mill Creek cityshed because of the greater response rate of CSOs to changing imperviousness in the former three citysheds. In addition, certain areas within the Green Infrastructure program area may be lower priority due to Green Infrastructure Funding from previous years of this program that is already committed to those areas. Efforts to coordinate with City Planning will also be considered, based on focused areas of redevelopment to partner with other funding sources such as community redevelopment fund areas. Project Specific Benefit points will be awarded for each 100 cubic feet of runoff volume reduced and each 100 square feet of impervious area removed or redirected to a BMP. Projects proposed by municipalities and local governmental agencies will receive more benefit points than non-profit entity projects, which will receive more benefit points than private entity projects. Additional benefit points may be awarded for proposed activities such as: public education, information, and communication; innovative green infrastructure technologies; stormwater monitoring and analysis program; location of CSO; project visibility; feasibility of future expansion; maintenance capability; long term sustainability; and environmental justice considerations. The total benefit points will be divided by MSD's cost (in thousands of dollars) to calculate the priority ranking. This will yield the most benefit points per MSD dollar spent. Award of Funds MSD will award funds through a Green Infrastructure Grant Program Agreement executed by MSD and the Grantee. The Agreement will describe the project, specify the funding amount and outline additional terms and conditions, and will serve as the legal commitment of both parties as to the scope and quality of work and the amount of funds committed. A BMP Expense Form, listing the amount of reimbursement for each BMP, will be attached to the Agreement. The BMP Expense Form must be completed prior to execution of the Agreement. Disbursement of Funds and Progress Reports Funds will be disbursed on a cost -incurred basis and supported with original receipts verifying costs. MSD construction approval of the green infrastructure facility, including stabilization of the tributary area upstream of the green infrastructure facility, is required prior to reimbursement. Progress reports are due with each payment request. Progress reports are required each month regardless of the level of work completed during the period unless otherwise specified by the District. Progress reports are required for timely processing of payment requests. Application and Submittal Process FY 2015 Submittals • The application period is from August 1, 2014 to October 31, 2014. • Applications are due to MSD by October 31, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. • MSD will notify the applicants of their decision by March 1, 2015. • Construction must begin prior to September 1, 2015. FY 2015 is the last year planned for early action project applications. Please direct all questions and submittals for this grant opportunity to Mark Koester of MSD's Program Planning Section. Interested applicants are encouraged to discuss possible proposals with Mr. Koester as soon as possible to facilitate good proposals and efficient reviews. Mark A. Koester, P.E. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District 2350 Market Street St. Louis, MO 63103 (314) 768-6327 makoes@stlmsd.com IGLAIZE 7 Legend n FOCUS AREA f BISSELL POINT SEWERSHED BOUNDARY E, gCOMBINED SEWER AREA ST. LOUIS COUNTY ST. LOUIS CITY The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District FOCUS AREA FOR GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE EARLY ACTION PROJECTS DE : 07t25/2ot . Scale: NPS 115 PROJECT NAME:DATE: TYPE OF GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY: MSD Maintanance Cost = BMP BENEFIT CATEGORY 2. Runoff volume reduction from MSD MEP spreadsheet (1 point per 100 cubic feet) 4. Municipality or local government agency, non-profit, or private applicant Gov Agency = 1000 pts, Non-Profit = 500 pts, Private = 0 pts 7. Project visibility High = 1000 pts, Medium = 500 pts, Low = 0 pts Yes Unique = 1000, Yes = 500 pts, No = 0 pts PRIORITY RANKING = TOTAL POINTS/ MSD COST IN THOUSANDS = CSO Volume Reduction - Green Infrastructure Program Early Action Projects Prioritization System Benefit Allocation Schedule 1. Existing Impervious area removed or redirected to BMP (1 point per 100 square feet) 3. Project watershed location (Add 50% increase to points from Items 1 & 2 above for projects in Harlem, Baden, Rocky Branch) 5. Project contains a public education, information, and communication component 6. Project contains a stormwater monitoring and analysis program (Add 500 points, or 1000 points if data is unique to MSD) 10. Environmental justice consideration Yes = 500 pts, No = 0 pts Yes = +50%, No = 0 pts Total PointsRobust = 500 pts, Average = 250 pts, Minimal = 100 pts, None = 0pts AMOUNT REQUESTED IN THOUSANDS = 9. Green infrastructure maintenance capability High = 500 pts, Medium = 250 pts, Low = 0 pts. 8. Potential for future expansion Yes = 100 pts, No = 0 pts TOTAL BMP BENEFIT POINTS July 2012 1 of 1 1 MSD GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this _____ day of ____________, 2013, by and between the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) and __________________________________ (GRANTEE) , regarding MSD P-XXXXXXX- XX. WHEREAS, MSD agreed, as part of its Consent Decree entered by the Federal District Court on April 27, 2012, that its Long Term Control Plan include $100 million commitment to implementing Green Infrastructure Best Management Practices (BMPs) as a control measure for reducing storm flow to the combined sewer system, thereby reducing combined sewer overflow volumes; and WHEREAS, MSD has a program to coordinate and grant partial funding to private property owners and other entities to construct Green Infrastructure BMPs and provide financial assistance for this construction; and WHEREAS, GRANTEE desires to make modifications to existing property, said modifications to include the construction of Green Infrastructure BMPs; and WHEREAS, GRANTEE has requested that MSD grant funding to participate in the cost of the Green Infrastructure BMPs; and WHEREAS, GRANTEE by (INSERT CORPORATE RESOLUTION OR BOARD ACTION AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT) has been authorized by its governing body, and the official(s) who has applied his/her signature to this GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT has been duly authorized to execute it for and on behalf of said entity, and otherwise to act as the representative of GRANTEE in connection with this GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT; and 2 WHEREAS MSD has reviewed and approved plans for this proposed project per its plan review procedures, approved plans known as MSD P-XXXXX-XX; and WHEREAS, MSD and the GRANTEE have agreed to the portions of the approved project that are reimbursable under the program as identified in the BMP Expense Form attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, MSD is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Ordinance No. ______, as adopted by the MSD Board of Trustees on ____________________. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of certain mutual benefits inuring to the parties hereto, and to the public, the receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. MSD will grant financial assistance to GRANTEE as reimbursement for GRANTEE’s direct costs for design, construction, and other related expenses associated with Green Infrastructure BMPs up to an amount not to exceed of $XX,XXX (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx dollars). 2. Prior to construction, GRANTEE must complete all Plan Approval processes and obtain all required Permits from MSD. 3. Runoff volume reduction capabilities of each BMP shall be calculated by the project design engineer which is identified in the approved plans known as MSD P-XXXXX-XX and provided to MSD. These calculations shall be reviewed and approved by MSD as part of the plan review process. 4. A maintenance agreement is required for each BMP, and this agreement shall be submitted to MSD prior to MSD approval of project plans. 5. Construction must begin within six months of notice of project approval for inclusion in the program from MSD. The construction start date may be 3 extended by MSD for good cause upon request from Grantee. Under no circumstances will Grantee be allowed to participate in this program if construction is not commenced within one year of the notice of project approval. 6. Construction of all BMPs shall be inspected by MSD per MSD private development inspection procedure. Conditions of payment: 7. Construction of all BMPs performed by the GRANTEE under the GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT must be perform ed to MSD’s satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of MSD’s authorized representative and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. 8. As applicable, when any work is contracted and/or subcontracted, GRANTEE shall ensure that Prevailing Rates of Pay are paid to all skilled and unskilled labor employees utilized, in accordance with Chapter 290, Sections 290.210 through and including 290.340, Revised Statutes of Missouri. GRANTEE shall provide an affidavit of compliance prior to final reimbursement. Failure to comply could result in non-payment or return of prior payments to MSD for work found to be in non-compliance. 9. The GRANTEE will not receive payment for work found by MSD to be unsatisfactory. 10. Prior to any payment of said financial assistance by MSD to GRANTEE, all portions of the approved project that are reimbursable under the program as 4 identified in the BMP Expense Form attached as Exhibit A included in each reimbursement payment request must meet standards for Construction Approval or be otherwise approved by MSD if the reimbursable work is not construction work. 11. GRANTEE must invoice MSD, providing details of costs incurred supported with original receipts verifying specific costs of Green Infrastructure BMPs. 12. Progress reports are required with each payment request. 13. GRANTEE must submit progress reports each month regardless of the level of work completed during the time period unless otherwise specified by MSD. Payment for work other than construction and return payments: 14. Under some circumstances and at its sole discretion MSD may reimburse GRANTEE for work other than construction work which is performed for BMPs identified in the BMP Expense Form. 15. If MSD reimburses GRANTEE for work as described in the preceding paragraph and GRANTEE either fails to construct a BMP, or constructs a BMP which is found to be unsatisfactory by MSD, then GRANTEE hereby agrees to return to MSD payment in the sum of any amount paid by MSD to GRANTEE for said work. 16. GRANTEE hereby agrees to deliver to MSD the return payment identified in the preceding paragraph within sixty days of receiving notice from MSD of conditions which MSD has found to give rise to a return payment and MSD ’s demand for a return payment. 5 BMP Maintenance: 17. GRANTEE shall track and report to MSD annually all BMP maintenance costs for the first five years of operation for each BMP. The BMP maintenance costs are not reimbursable under this program. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Agreement Complete: 18. The GRANTEE may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under the GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT without the prior consent of MSD and a fully executed Amendment. 19. Any amendment to the GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved. 20. If MSD fails to enforce any provision of the grant agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 21. The GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT contains all negotiations and agreements between the MSD and GRANTEE. No other understanding regarding the GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. Liability: 22. GRANTEE must indemnify, save and hold MSD, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or causes of action, including all attorneys’ fees incurred by MSD arising from the construction of the BMPs or arising from the performance of the GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT by the GRANTEE or its agents or employees. Termination of GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT: 6 23. Termination by the MSD. MSD may cancel the GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to the GRANTEE. Upon termination, the GRANTEE will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. 24. Termination by the GRANTEE. The GRANTEE may request termination upon 30 day’s notice to MSD’s authorized representative. Upon termination, the GRANTEE is entitled to payment for services actually performed and agrees to return any unused funds to MSD if any exist at the time of termination. Document Retention: 25. GRANTEE hereby agrees to retain copies of any reports, plans, invoices, permits, and documents submitted to the District related to this program, as well as any underlying research and data used to develop said submittals, for a period of five (5) years after the above referenced consent decree is terminated unless otherwise notified by the District. 26. At any time during the information-retention period identified above, upon request by the District, GRANTEE shall provide copies of any research and data underlying any of the reports, plans, permits, and documents submitted to the District pursuant to this section within a reasonable timeframe. 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT BY: ____________________________ Brian Hoelscher Executive Director ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL ___________________________ BY: ____________________________ Timothy R. Snoke Secretary-Treasurer GRANTEE BY: ____________________________ ATTEST: ____________________________ Project Name: MSD Project Number: MSD Oracle Number: MSD Ordinance Number: Date: Reimbursable BMPs Annual Runoff Volume Reduction (cu. ft.) Impervious Area to BMPs (s.f.)Cost Estimate Reimbursement Request MSD Approved Reimbursement Description of BMP Total (Reimbursement Request should not be more than Not To Exceed Amount) MSD Green Infrastructure Grant Program BMP Expense Form Exhibit A APPENDIX CC RAINSCAPING SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM – BACKGROUND, PROGRAM GUIDELINES, AND APPLICATION; LIST OF RECIPIENTS FOR MODEL ROUND AND FULL ROUND MSD Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program Landowner Guide Part of http://www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain-out/rainscaping-small-grants-program/ www.mobot.org/rainscaping Email: Rainscaping@mobot.org Phone: 314.577.0202 February 6, 2015 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District’s Project Clear is the initiative to improve water quality and alleviate many wastewater concerns in the St. Louis region. It will invest billions of dollars over a generation in planning, designing, and building community rainscaping projects, system improvements, and an ambitious program of maintenance and repair. One of the initiatives for MSD Project Clear includes $100 million in rainscaping investments. Rainscaping is any combination of plantings, water features, catch basins, permeable pavement, and more that manage stormwater as close as possible to where it falls, rather than moving it someplace else. Below ground level, improved soils store and filter stormwater, allowing the surrounding area to slowly absorb it over time. Above ground level, native plants, basins, and water features create public green spaces that also help store water. Used effectively, rainscaping can reclaim stormwater naturally, reduce sewer overflows, and minimize basement backups. The purpose of the rainscaping program is to reduce the volume of stormwater in our combined sewer system by installing landscaping that helps capture rain where it falls, instead of allowing water to run off-site. Rainscaping can also be employed to solve a drainage problem, increase aesthetic appeal, improve property values, and attract birds and butterflies, in addition to other benefits. Rainscaping practices can include features such as rain gardens, bioretention cells, pervious pavement, green roofs, etc. to slow down, soak up and reuse the rainwater before it gets to the sewer. MSD Project Clear has designed and built a number of pilot projects, predominately in MSD’s Bissell Watershed focus area, to analyze which features work best in specific geographic areas. MSD Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program encourages the public to use simple rainscaping techniques on their properties to reduce the impact of stormwater on the sewer system. A 2014 model project round was completed, and will provide a great audience for education about rainscaping features! A larger grant program will be available to homeowners in 2015. MSD Project Clear and the Missouri Botanical Garden will work together to assist landowners with their projects. Revised 2.6.2015 Page 2 of 10 Landowner Guide Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program Introduction Rainscaping Small Grants is a program of MSD Project Clear with administrative/technical assistance provided by the Missouri Botanical Garden. Funds are available to sites within the boundaries of the Rainscaping Small Grants Program Focus Area in St. Louis, Missouri. The purpose of the program is to reduce the volume of stormwater going into the combined sewer system by installing “Rainscaping” - landscaping that helps capture rain where it falls, instead of allowing water to run off-site. Rainscaping can also be employed to help solve a drainage problem, increase aesthetic appeal, improve property values, and attract birds and butterflies in addition to other benefits. Basic Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program Parameters Eligible Entities Landowners may only submit for property WITHIN the Rainscaping Small Grants Program Focus Area (see map at http://www.projectclearstl.org/wp- content/uploads/2014/05/pc_rainscaping_focus_area_3192x_02.jpg ) - includes homes, schools, churches, government entities and businesses. Grants are not eligible for employees of Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, or Missouri Botanical Garden. Small Grants Periods There are two rounds of grants planned at this time, a mod el round directed at community- based sites which has been completed and one full round currently taking place in 2015. See timeline below. Site Size Limits Landscaping projects converting established lawns or pavement or restoring woodlands, and permeable paver projects, must be at least 100 square feet in size. Green roof or rain barrel projects have no size limits. Project Time Constraints Only projects to be installed after the Small Grants Application Notice to Proceed email is received after April 20, 2015 and within Small Grants Project timeframes will be considered. Landowner agrees to maintain the design feature for a minimum of five years. See timeline below. Reimbursement Guidelines Projects are 100% reimbursable up to maximum $3,000 per grant for documented design/installation costs. Maintenance costs are the responsibility of the landowner. Paid receipts are preferred if not electing Advanced Payment Method, and a follow-up site visit will be done to verify installation prior to reimbursement. If contractor fees are included in grant requests they must be from a Rainscaping Small Grants Participating Contractor. Up to one- third of the grant amount may be eligible for advanced payment with detailed documentation. Eligibility for advanced payments will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Plan Requirements For landscaping features, a Planting Plan is required with information on plant species, container size, number of plants and planting densities, plant material source, soil amendments to be used, and maintenance plan. Native plants are preferred but not required. Native cultivars will be considered equivalent to native plants. A two to three inch mulch layer is required where appropriate to inhibit weed growth, prevent soil loss, and retain moisture. Eligible Improvements Features must improve Rainscaping functions of the land. See Eligible Improvements List for options. Design goals are to retain stormwater on site - the primary evaluation criteria. Contractor Involvement – Includes all Professionals assisting land- owners: designers, landscape architects, Landowners can act as their own contractor. However seeking advice of professionals is highly advised. If a landowner uses a contractor they must be a Participating Rainscaping Contractor in order for labor to be expensed. Grants are given to the landowner – participating contractors should provide invoicing and receive payment as they do regularly. Contractors wishing to help landowners must follow the guidelines in this document and the Rainscaping Small Grants Application to become a Participating Rainscaping Contractor. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District and Missouri Botanical Garden lists Participating Contractors but DO NOT Revised 2.6.2015 Page 3 of 10 Landowner Guide Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program and installers certify the technical expertise of contractors participating in the program. Eligible Improvements Eligible Improvements reflect available technologies and measures that are eligible for the Rainscaping Small Grants Program. In general, projects must retain stormwater on the site to reduce the volume of stormwater entering the combined sewer system. MSD Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program Eligible Improvements List Rainscaping Features Design Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program Participating Contractors help you identify the best opportunities for rainscaping features on your land and can also assist with installation of the features. The costs of the design and installation are eligible for consideration (up to program limits) for grants. Review all program requirements for the MSD Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program. There are limits to location, features, and costs. Municipal ordinances and/or MSD requirements must be followed where applicable. Further details can be found at http://www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain- out/rainscaping-small-grants-program/ and www.mobot.org/rainscaping . Landscaping Features Landscaping plan must remove and/or replace a minimum of 100 square feet of established lawn, invasive species, or pavement. Re-landscaping of previously landscaped areas is not allowed. Rain Garden – Native Soil Type A properly performed percolation test must be conducted prior to rain garden installation. Minimum test results: 0.25in/hr. An appropriately installed rain garden includes plants with robust root structures, mulch, optional soil amendments, a way to pond water, and consideration for how and where water will flow out of the rain garden. No sand or "Rain Garden Mix" may be used in a Native Soil Rain Garden. Rain Garden – Engineered Bioretention Type In bioretention rain gardens, existing soil is completely removed and replaced with high sand content "Rain Garden Mix" and usually includes an underdrain. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District bioretention design specifications must be followed, and an over the counter MSD permit is required. Landowners should contact MSD’s Engineer of the Day at 314-768-2705 prior to submittal. Lawn Alternatives Lawn alternatives, including trees, shrubs, perennials, and groundcover, replacing existing turf grass can be installed instead of a rain garden where a percolation test shows poor drainage. Lawn alternatives must include plants with robust root structures, approved soil amendments, and mulching. Soil Amendments Mulches are spread on top of the soil. Approved mulches are shredded bark, shredded hardwood bark, wood chips, shredded leaves, or a compost layer on top of the soil. Gravel or stone may be substituted for organic mulch where water flows rapidly into or out of rain gardens or bioswales. Soil amendments sometimes includes material turned into the soil such as silt loam topsoil, well-aged compost, calcined clay, expanded gypsum or shale, and/or mycorrhizal inoculants. Soil aeration is another option. Sandy loam topsoil, sand, and "Rain Garden Mix" are not eligible soil amendments. Soil amendments are considered eligible improvements only when paired with another plant-based eligible improvement on this list. Bioswales A bioswale is designed to slow down the speed of the water, use plants to increase absorption of the water into the soil, and guide the water to another location such as a rain garden or other rainscaping feature. Revised 2.6.2015 Page 4 of 10 Landowner Guide Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program Rock Weirs Rock weirs may be included in a bioswale or other rainscaping feature and are used to slow down the velocity of the water on a hillside. Compost Filter Socks Compost filter socks may be used to slow down the speed of the water on a hillside, be seeded or planted, be stacked to form a living wall, be backfilled with soil and plantings to form mini-terraces on difficult-to-plant hillsides, be used as a rain garden berm, or be employed in sensitive areas (such as a woodland) instead of a rain garden, where digging might damage tree roots. Woodland Restoration Woodland restoration projects must include both invasive species removal and appropriate tree and groundcover replacements to be eligible. There must be an existing woodland present. Rainwater Harvesting Features Rainwater Harvesting captures rainwater and stores it for reuse. The maintenance plan must include use of the water. Rain Barrels Larger rain barrels are viewed more favorably than smaller ones, but all sizes are accepted. Cisterns Care should be taken to design and install cisterns appropriately. Other Features Green Roofs Green roofs are eligible for MSD Rainscaping Small Grants Program. Permeable Pavers Permeable pavers allow rain water and stormwater to permeate through the cracks and gravel spaces into the soil, reducing the amount of runoff from a particular surface such as a walkway, driveway, or patio. To be eligible, the permeable pavement area must be 100 square feet or larger and must replace non-permeable pavement. Additional Rainscaping Strategies The MSD Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program is willing to evaluate alternative rainscaping features that are not already covered within this list of eligible measures, provided they include best management practices that are proven and tested to be reliable. Ineligible Features Yard Management The purchase of materials such as de-icing alternatives to salt is not eligible for grants. Lawn Care Lawn care actions such as aeration are not eligible for grants, except as described under Soil Amendments. Annual Plants and Vegetable Gardens Annual plants, including vegetables gardens, are not eligible for grants. Compost Bins/Piles Although amendment with compost is encouraged within rainscaping features, the compost bins themselves do not retain rain water, and are therefore not eligible for grants. Maintenance of Existing Features All funding is for rainscaping features installed after the “notice to proceed” has been received by an applicant. Retaining Walls Retaining walls are not eligible for grants unless built for the sole purpose of creating an eligible feature. Revised 2.6.2015 Page 5 of 10 Landowner Guide Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program Small Grants Application Process for Landowners This program is designed to allow flexibility in options and timing for expanding rainscaping options in the Rainscaping Program Focus Area. The following steps are the typical process for a landowner: 1. ATTEND REQUIRED LANDOWNER ORIENTATION: Landowners must attend a landowner orientation to learn of program parameters and requirements. Orientations are two hours long and are held at MSD’s Headquarters. Advanced registration is required. Go to http://www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain-out/rainscaping-small-grants-program/ for more details and to register online. 2. CONSULT WITH PARTICIPATING CONTRACTORS: The program suggests getting bids from up to three participating contractor companies – however, competitive bids are not required to participate in the program. To be considered a Rainscaping Small Grants Program Participating Contractor, these companies must comply with certain program requirements such as possession of a business license, proof of insurance, and attendance at a required workshop. Landowners can act as their own contractors but the program strongly suggests using professionals trained to help you accomplish your goals. Consult with the contractors you’ve chosen to obtain rainscaping options for your land and obtain bids for the services to provide you with your chosen options. Participating Contractors are listed on the website with contact information and category of service provided (Designer and/or Installer). Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District and Missouri Botanical Garden lists Participating Contractors but DO NOT certify the technical expertise of contractors participating in the program. 3. COMPLETE AND SUBMIT SMALL GRANT APPLICATION FORM: Landowners complete the Small Grant Application form contained within the Rainscaping Small Grants Program Guidelines. This requires decisions on the following: type of rainscaping features to be installed; plants to be included; tests to conduct; strategies to select; determination of site features; budget; outreach options; and landowners will also have to include a landscape drawing with the potential features, a photo(s) of the exact future locations of chosen rainscaping features, a maintenance plan and documentary of Dig Right survey. Decisions are best made in consultation with one or more Participating Contractors for the Rainscaping Small Grants Program. Participating Contractors are independent businesses and therefore will charge the landowner fees for their involvement. These fees can be included in the total bids submitted with the application. However, any design fees will only be reimbursed if the project is accepted. Installation fees should not be incurred until after the project has been accepted. Also, landowners are responsible for paying Participating Contractors in a timely manner. Generally, grant payments will come after the project is fully completed and evaluated, well after due dates for completed contractor work. See #6 below for Advanced Payment Request potential. 4. APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS: Funds are limited; therefore there is no guarantee that everyone that submits a qualifying application will receive a grant. Only completed applications with appropriately designed projects will be considered. The Rainscaping Small Grants Team will review and score all applications. It is estimated that approximately 5-10 projects will be funded in the Model Round and 40-45 projects will be funded in the Full Round. Evaluations will determine the projects chosen for funding. Every project must meet the primary goal of retaining stormwater on the site. Priority will be given to projects that meet one or more of the following criteria: Revised 2.6.2015 Page 6 of 10 Landowner Guide Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program a. Large amount of stormwater managed b. Location accessible for public viewing or available for other outreach efforts c. High percentage of native plants d. Appropriate design e. Cost effective solutions f. Appropriate maintenance plan 5. RECEIVE A NOTICE TO PROCEED: Once evaluations are completed and projects are chosen for funding, landowners will receive a Notice to Proceed. See Rainscaping Small Grants Program Time Frame on Page 7 for notification dates. NO INSTALLATION WORK SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE LANDOWNER HAS RECEIVED A NOTICE TO PROCEED. 6. REQUEST ADVANCED PAYMENT: MSD wants to make it as easy as possible for you to participate. Therefore, we are willing to make payment based on the unpaid contractor invoice, as opposed to requiring a paid invoice. Here is how we will handle payments. a. We can make advanced payment for up to 1/3 of grant amount. i. If a Participating Contractor is involved, payment will be in the form of a dual check to the landowner and contractor. Landowner will sign the check and then give to the Participating Contractor. ii. If doing the work yourself (DIY), advanced payment will be based on detailed list of materials, advertised or quoted cost, and supplier where materials will be purchased or rented. b. For final payment: i. When Participating Contractor is involved, the landowner submits the contractor's invoice with their Project Completion Form. AFTER our quality control/ground truthing work, we will issue a dual check UP TO THE AMOUNT OF THE GRANT. Any additional amount over the grant dollars will be the landowner’s responsibility. ii. For final DIY payment, we will need receipts for materials/equipment purchased or rented for the project – so in this case, at least 2/3 of the project cost must be paid for by the landowner prior to getting reimbursed. IMPORTANT: When talking with your contractor YOU MUST MAKE SURE THEY ARE WILLING TO WAIT FOR PAYMENT if you plan to have MSD payment for the unpaid contractor invoice. 7. COMPLETE PROJECT WORK: Full Round Projects must be completed within two growing seasons of Notice to Proceed in the Spring or Fall of 2015. This allows time for the variety of project types to be installed and/or implemented. 8. SUBMIT PROJECT COMPLETION FORM: Once work is completed and contractor invoices have been paid or purchases made, the Landowner must submit a signed Project Completion Form, along with copies of paid invoices or receipts. Landowners will receive instructions on completing this packet. See Rainscaping Small Grants Time Frame chart for final due dates. 9. QUALITY CONTROL (QC)/GROUND TRUTHING WORK: Once the Project Completion Form is received a site visit will be planned to confirm proper installation of features and to collect final data. Concurrently, the Project Completion Form will be reviewed to ensure Revised 2.6.2015 Page 7 of 10 Landowner Guide Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program all information is included. Landowners should expect to receive a call to schedule the site visit within six weeks of submittal of Project Completion Form. 10. GRANT PAYMENT PROCESSED: Once the QC/Ground Truthing is completed, data has been collected, and the Project Completion Form has been verified, then grant payments will be issued to landowners. Program estimates are for payments to be mailed from MSD offices approximately twelve weeks from receipt of Project Completion Form. Quality Control and Ground Truthing Every project will be monitored for full compliance with proper installation of Rainscaping features, with minimum metrics collected and periodically evaluated. Additionally, all projects are eligible for site visits to gather further data and to pursue ground truthing. Several projects will be promoted in case studies on the website to further promote rainscaping. To ensure no appearances of conflict of interest, employees of Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District and Missouri Botanical Garden are not eligible for grants. All completed projects done for family members or employees of the installing contractor(s) will be flagged for full on-site Quality Control and Ground Truthing inspections. Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program Time Frame Full Round Applications Available February 6, 2015 Contractor and Landowner Workshops February/March, 2015 Grant Applications Due March 20, 2015 Project Notifications Out April 20, 2015 Planting Time Spring and Fall 2015 Project Receipts and Completion Forms Due No later than October 9, 2015 Quality Control/Ground Truthing/Completion Forms Processed Within 6 weeks of receipt of Project Completion Forms Grant Funds Dispersed to Landowners Within 12 weeks of receipt of Project Completion Forms Revised 2.6.2015 Page 8 of 10 Landowner Guide Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program Application Assistance A. To obtain a Rainscaping Small Grants application form, interested applicants can download a form from the Project Clear website at http://www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain- out/rainscaping-small-grants-program/. Applications are also available at MSD’s headquarters at 2350 Market Street or at Missouri Botanical Garden’s Education Building at 4651 Shaw Boulevard. B. To determine which types of Rainscaping you wish to install, visit the Missouri Botanical Garden’s RainScaping Guide at www.mobot.org/rainscaping for a list of all options. C. To determine improvements eligible for funding, see pages 3-4 of this document. D. To get an idea of types and number of plants you’ll need based on the size of your space visit the Garden’s RainScaping page www.mobot.org/rainscaping. Under the “How to RainScape” section is a link called “Select Plants”. E. Landowners can conduct their own percolation tests. To learn more about how to conduct your own percolation test, visit the Garden’s RainScaping page www.mobot.org/rainscaping for a link to Percolation Test Instructions. F. To calculate the amount of mulch you will need for your project: go to St. Louis Composting’s “cubic yard calculator”: http://stlcompost.com/cubic-yard-calculator/. G. For price estimates of plants, you’ll want to call any or all of the local independent garden centers. A list of local retail garden centers and nurseries (with contact info) can be found at: http://grownative.org/resource-guide/plants/. More information can also be found at http://www.gatewaygardener.com/links and http://www.hortco-op.org/. H. To help design a maintenance plan visit http://www.hortco-op.org/ for a list of member organizations that might be able to provide some guidance. Also see rain garden maintenance guidance at http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/sustainability-conservation/sustainable- living/at-home/rainscaping-guide/design-and-build-a-rain-garden/maintain.aspx or http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/Portals/0/Shaw%20Nature%20Reserve/PDFs/horticult ure/NLM%20Ch4.pdf. I. To see an example of a landscape drawing, visit the Garden’s RainScaping page www.mobot.org/rainscaping for a link to a sample landscape drawing and also a link to graph paper. You can create your own scale, key, and symbols for your drawing. You may also submit more than one drawing in your application. For example, you may want to provide an overall site map with all the buildings and features on your property, and you may want to provide an additional drawing with more details about your Rainscaping feature. Revised 2.6.2015 Page 9 of 10 Landowner Guide Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program J. To locate underground utility lines on your property (to denote in your landscape drawing) call 1.800.344.7483 (DIG-RITE). Missouri law requires that a location request be placed before beginning any excavation. The utilities should respond to your request within 3 working days by:  Marking the approximate location of their facilities or  Notifying you that they have no facilities in your dig site area. After confirming utility response, you can then proceed with your excavation avoiding damages. More details can be found at: http://www.mo1call.com/. Additional Resources To find out more about Rainscaping in general including what rainscaping is, available options, suggested plant lists, and more: www.mobot.org/rainscaping More rainscaping resources can also be found at: http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/sustainability-conservation/sustainable-living/at- home/rainscaping-guide/resources.aspx To learn more about the Rainscaping Small Grants Program: On this site you will find more details on how the program works, workshop dates for further information, resources, deadlines etc.: http://www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain-out/rainscaping-small-grants-program/ For an online version of the application: http://www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain-out/rainscaping- small-grants-program/ For Maps of the Rainscaping Program Focus Area: http://www.projectclearstl.org/wp- content/uploads/2014/05/pc_rainscaping_focus_area_3192x_02.jpg If you are doing work on trees in your landscape, certified Arborists in the St. Louis area can be found at: http://www.stlouisarborists.com/ or email info@stlouisarborists.com An invasive plant species list with native alternatives can be found at: www.mobot.org/rainscaping A great book explaining the benefits of native plants to wildlife is “Bringing Nature Home” by Douglas Tallamy. Revised 2.6.2015 Page 10 of 10 Landowner Guide Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program Exceptions Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program administrators can approve reasonable exceptions to written policies on a grant-by-grant basis. Administrators also have the right to deny any project or application if they do not meet project guidelines. Contact Information If you have questions regarding the program guidelines, please email Rainscaping@mobot.org. If you need to speak to someone, please call the general program phone number at 314-577-0202. Additional resources are available online at http://www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain-out/rainscaping-small- grants-program/ and www.mobot.org/rainscaping. MSD Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Program A program of Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, with technical assistance from Missouri Botanical Garden &ç½½ZÊçÄ soil amendments & mulching permeable pavers rainwater harvesting lawn alternatives green roof rock weirs & filter socks bioswale rain garden creek corridor vegetative buffer woodland restoration yard management D^WÙÊ¹ã½ÙZ®ÄÝÖ®Ä¦^Ã½½'ÙÄãÝWÙÊ¦ÙÃ Background DĞƚƌŽƉŽůŝƚĂŶ^ƚ͘>ŽƵŝƐ^ĞǁĞƌŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͛ƐWƌŽũĞĐƚůĞĂƌŝƐƚŚĞŝŶŝƟĂƟǀĞƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞǁĂƚĞƌƋƵĂůŝƚǇĂŶĚĂůůĞǀŝĂƚĞŵĂŶǇǁĂƐƚĞǁĂƚĞƌĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐŝŶƚŚĞ ^ƚ͘>ŽƵŝƐƌĞŐŝŽŶ͘/ƚǁŝůůŝŶǀĞƐƚďŝůůŝŽŶƐŽĨĚŽůůĂƌƐŽǀĞƌĂŐĞŶĞƌĂƟŽŶŝŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ƐǇƐƚĞŵ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚĂŶĂŵďŝƟŽƵƐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŽĨŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĂŶĚƌĞƉĂŝƌ͘ KŶĞŽĨƚŚĞŝŶŝƟĂƟǀĞƐĨŽƌD^WƌŽũĞĐƚůĞĂƌŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐΨϭϬϬŵŝůůŝŽŶŝŶƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘ZĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐŝƐĂŶǇĐŽŵďŝŶĂƟŽŶŽĨƉůĂŶƟŶŐƐ͕ǁĂƚĞƌ ĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͕ĐĂƚĐŚďĂƐŝŶƐ͕ƉĞƌŵĞĂďůĞƉĂǀĞŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐƚŚĂƚŵĂŶĂŐĞƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌĂƐĐůŽƐĞĂƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞƚŽǁŚĞƌĞŝƚĨĂůůƐ͕ƌĂƚŚĞƌƚŚĂŶ ŵŽǀŝŶŐŝƚƐŽŵĞƉůĂĐĞĞůƐĞ͘ĞůŽǁŐƌŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞů͕ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚƐŽŝůƐƐƚŽƌĞĂŶĚĮůƚĞƌƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌ͕ĂůůŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂƚŽƐůŽǁůǇĂďƐŽƌďŝƚ ŽǀĞƌƟŵĞ͘ďŽǀĞŐƌŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞů͕ŶĂƟǀĞƉůĂŶƚƐ͕ďĂƐŝŶƐ͕ĂŶĚǁĂƚĞƌĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐĐƌĞĂƚĞƉƵďůŝĐŐƌĞĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƚŚĂƚĂůƐŽŚĞůƉƐƚŽƌĞǁĂƚĞƌ͘hƐĞĚĞīĞĐƟǀĞůǇ͕ ƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĐĂŶƌĞĐůĂŝŵƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌŶĂƚƵƌĂůůǇ͕ƌĞĚƵĐĞƐĞǁĞƌŽǀĞƌ ŇŽǁƐ͕ĂŶĚŵŝŶŝŵŝǌĞďĂƐĞŵĞŶƚďĂĐŬƵƉƐ͘dŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽĨƚŚĞƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ ŝƐƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞǀŽůƵŵĞŽĨƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌŝŶŽƵƌĐŽŵďŝŶĞĚƐĞǁĞƌƐǇƐƚĞŵďǇŝŶƐƚĂůůŝŶŐůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐƚŚĂƚŚĞůƉƐĐĂƉƚƵƌĞƌĂŝŶǁŚĞƌĞŝƚĨĂůůƐ͕ŝŶƐƚĞĂĚ ŽĨĂůůŽǁŝŶŐǁĂƚĞƌƚŽƌƵŶŽīͲƐŝƚĞ͘ZĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĐĂŶĂůƐŽďĞĞŵƉůŽǇĞĚƚŽƐŽůǀĞĂĚƌĂŝŶĂŐĞƉƌŽďůĞŵ͕ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĂĞƐƚŚĞƟĐĂƉƉĞĂů͕ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ ǀĂůƵĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĂƩƌĂĐƚďŝƌĚƐĂŶĚďƵƩĞƌŇŝĞƐ͕ŝŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƚŽŽƚŚĞƌďĞŶĞĮƚƐ͘ ZĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐƉƌĂĐƟĐĞƐĐĂŶŝŶĐůƵĚĞĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐƌĂŝŶŐĂƌĚĞŶƐ͕ďŝŽƌĞƚĞŶƟŽŶĐĞůůƐ͕ƉĞƌǀŝŽƵƐƉĂǀĞŵĞŶƚ͕ŐƌĞĞŶƌŽŽĨƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘ƚŽƐůŽǁĚŽǁŶ͕ƐŽĂŬƵƉ ĂŶĚƌĞƵƐĞƚŚĞƌĂŝŶǁĂƚĞƌďĞĨŽƌĞŝƚŐĞƚƐƚŽƚŚĞƐĞǁĞƌ͘D^WƌŽũĞĐƚůĞĂƌŚĂƐĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚĂŶĚďƵŝůƚĂŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨƉŝůŽƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƉƌĞĚŽŵŝŶĂƚĞůǇŝŶD^͛Ɛ ŝƐƐĞůůWŽŝŶƚtĂƚĞƌƐŚĞĚĨŽĐƵƐĂƌĞĂƚŽĂŶĂůǇǌĞǁŚŝĐŚĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐǁŽƌŬďĞƐƚŝŶƐƉĞĐŝĮĐŐĞŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĂƌĞĂƐ͘ D^WƌŽũĞĐƚůĞĂƌZĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ^ŵĂůů'ƌĂŶƚƐWƌŽŐƌĂŵĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƐƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƚŽƵƐĞƐŝŵƉůĞƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐƚĞĐŚŶŝƋƵĞƐŽŶƚŚĞŝƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƟĞƐƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞ ƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚŽĨƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌŽŶƚŚĞƐĞǁĞƌƐǇƐƚĞŵ͘ϮϬϭϰŵŽĚĞůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͕ĂŶĚǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŐƌĞĂƚĂƵĚŝĞŶĐĞĨŽƌĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ ĂďŽƵƚƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͊ůĂƌŐĞƌŐƌĂŶƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵǁŝůůďĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞƚŽŚŽŵĞŽǁŶĞƌƐŝŶϮϬϭϱ͘ D^WƌŽũĞĐƚůĞĂƌĂŶĚƚŚĞDŝƐƐŽƵƌŝŽƚĂŶŝĐĂů'ĂƌĚĞŶǁŝůůǁŽƌŬƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌƚŽĂƐƐŝƐƚůĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ FUNDING SELECTION CRITERIA ƵĞƚŽůŝŵŝƚĞĚĨƵŶĚƐ͕ƋƵĂůŝĮĞĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐǁŝůůďĞĐŽŵƉĞƟƟǀĞůǇƐĐŽƌĞĚ͘ KŶůǇĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐǁŝůůďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚ͘KŶůǇĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞůǇ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚĞůŝŐŝďůĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝůůďĞƌĞǀŝĞǁĞĚ͘All aspects of the project must meet eligibility requirements to be considered for ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů;ŶŽƉĂƌƟĂůĨƵŶĚŝŶŐͿ͘ /ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ƉƌŝŽƌŝƚǇǁŝůůďĞŐŝǀĞŶƚŽƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŚĂƚŵĞĞƚŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞŽĨƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͗;ϭͿůĂƌŐĞĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌŵĂŶĂŐĞĚ͖;ϮͿŚŝŐŚƉĞƌͲ ĐĞŶƚĂŐĞŽĨŶĂƟǀĞƉůĂŶƚƐ͖;ϯͿĐŽƐƚĞīĞĐƟǀĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͖;ϰͿĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ͖ ;ϱͿĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĨŽƌŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚ͖;ϲͿĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĂŶĚĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞƉůĂŶ͘ REIMBURSEMENT GUIDELINES ĂĐŚůĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌŝƐĞůŝŐŝďůĞƚŽƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĂƌĞďĂƚĞŽĨϭϬϬйŽĨĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĂŶĚ ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĞĚĐŽƐƚƐƵƉƚŽĂŵĂǆŝŵƵŵŽĨΨϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĐŽƐƚƐĂƌĞ ƚŚĞƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚǇŽĨƚŚĞůĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌ͘ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůůĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌƐŵĂǇŽŶůǇ ďĞĂǁĂƌĚĞĚŽŶĞŐƌĂŶƚ͘/ŶƐƟƚƵƟŽŶĂůŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌƐŵĂǇ ďĞĂǁĂƌĚĞĚƵƉƚŽĨŽƵƌŐƌĂŶƚƐ͘KŶůǇŽŶĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƉĞƌ /ŶƐƟƚƵƟŽŶĂůͬĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͘ĞƐƵƌĞƚŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂůůƐƵƉƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂů ĂƩĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐƉĞƌƚĂŝŶŝŶŐƚŽĞĂĐŚŐƌĂŶƚƉĞƌ͞ƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ͟;ŝĞ͘ ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞďƵĚŐĞƚƐ͕ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚƌĂǁŝŶŐƐ͕ƉůĂŶƚůŝƐƚƐ͕ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞƉůĂŶƐ͕ ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ͘/&ŵƵůƟƉůĞŐƌĂŶƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕ĞĂĐŚŽŶĞŵƵƐƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞ ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĨĞĂƚƵƌĞĂŶĚŝĨƉůĂŶƚͲďĂƐĞĚ͕ƚŚĞĨĞĂƚƵƌĞ;ƐͿŵƵƐƚƌĞƉůĂĐĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚ ϭϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚŽĨůĂǁŶ͕ŝŶǀĂƐŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͕ŝŵƉĞƌǀŝŽƵƐƐƵƌĨĂĐĞ͕ŽƌďĂƌĞ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ͘^ĂǀĞĂůůŝƚĞŵŝǌĞĚƌĞĐĞŝƉƚƐĂŶĚͬŽƌŝŶǀŽŝĐĞƐƚŽƐƵďŵŝƚĨŽƌƉĂǇŵĞŶƚ͘ ^ŝƚĞǀŝƐŝƚƐǁŝůůďĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĚƚŽǀĞƌŝĨǇŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƟŽŶƉƌŝŽƌƚŽƌĞŝŵďƵƌƐĞŵĞŶƚ͘ PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS • ^ŝƚĞŵƵƐƚďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞWƌŽŐƌĂŵ&ŽĐƵƐƌĞĂ͘;^ĞĞ map at www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain-out/rainscaping- small-grants-program/͘Ϳ>ĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů͕ ŝŶƐƟƚƵƟŽŶĂůĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĂƌĞĞůŝŐŝďůĞƚŽƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞ͘ • KŶůǇƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŽďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚĂŌĞƌƉƌŝůϮϬ͕ϮϬϭϱǁŝůůďĞ considered. • WůĂŶƚͲďĂƐĞĚƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐŵƵƐƚƌĞŵŽǀĞĂŶĚƌĞƉůĂĐĞĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵ ŽĨϭϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚŽĨĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚůĂǁŶ͕ŝŶǀĂƐŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͕ ŝŵƉĞƌǀŝŽƵƐƐƵƌĨĂĐĞ͕ŽƌďĂƌĞŐƌŽƵŶĚ͘EŽƌĞͲůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐŽĨ ƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůǇůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĂƌĞĂƐǁŝůůďĞĂĐĐĞƉƚĞĚ͘&ŽƌŵŽƌĞ details, refer to the Eligible Improvements ListĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶ ƚŚĞ>ĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌ'ƵŝĚĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĂƚwww.projectclearstl.org/ get-the-rain-out/rainscaping-small-grants-program/. • /ŶĐůƵĚĞĂƉůĂŶƚůŝƐƚ͘hƐĞƉůĂŶƚƉĂůĞƩĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐĂƚ www.mobot.org/rainscapingŽƌĚĞĨĞŶĚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƟǀĞƐ͘DŝƐƐŽƵƌŝ ŶĂƟǀĞƉůĂŶƚƐĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƌĐƵůƟǀĂƌƐĂƌĞƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚďƵƚŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘ • Landowner agrees to maintain the design feature for a ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨĮǀĞǇĞĂƌƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐǁĂƚĞƌŝŶŐƉůĂŶƚƐĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚŵĞŶƚƉŚĂƐĞ͕ǁĞĞĚŝŶŐ͕ƉƌƵŶŝŶŐ͕ĂŶŶƵĂůŵƵůĐŚŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚ plant replacement as needed. • ƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶŵƵƐƚďĞƐƵďŵŝƩĞĚĂŶĚƐŝŐŶĞĚďǇƚŚĞactual land- owner͕ĞǀĞŶŝĨƚŚĞĂĐƚƵĂůůĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌŝƐŶŽƚŝŶǀŽůǀĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ project. Program Guidelines MSD Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants Application CONTACT INFORMATION & SCOPE OF PROJECT EĂŵĞ ___________________________________________________________WŚŽŶĞEƵŵďĞƌ _________________________________________ Address _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ŝƚǇ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Zip _________________________ Email address __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ϭ͘ ŝĚǇŽƵĂƩĞŶĚĂƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚůĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌŽƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ͍٪Yes ٪EŽ ĂƚĞŽĨŽƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ ______________________________________ Ϯ͘ /ƐǇŽƵƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŝŶƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚůĞĂƌZĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐWƌŽŐƌĂŵ&ŽĐƵƐƌĞĂ͍٪Yes ٪EŽ (Go to www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain-out/rainscaping-small-grants-program/ƚŽĚŽǁŶůŽĂĚĂĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚ&ŽĐƵƐƌĞĂŵĂƉ͕ƉƌŝŶƚ͕ŵĂƌŬ ǇŽƵƌůŽĐĂƟŽŶŽŶŝƚ͕ĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞǁŝƚŚǇŽƵƌĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶ͘Ϳ ϯ͘ WƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐ;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞͿ͗٪ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů٪/ŶƐƚŝƚƵƚŝŽŶĂůͬŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů;ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĐŚƵƌĐŚĞƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ ϰ͘ dǇƉĞ;ƐͿĂŶĚƐŝǌĞ;ƐͿŽĨƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐƚŽďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚ͖ĐŚĞĐŬĂůůƚŚĂƚĂƉƉůǇ͘;'ŽƚŽwww.mobot.org/rainscapingĨŽƌƐƚĞƉͲďǇͲƐƚĞƉƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉĞ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐŐƵŝĚĂŶĐĞ͘EKd͗ĐŚŽŽƐĞŽŶůǇŽŶĞďŽǆĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞǇŽƵĂƌĞŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƟŶŐ͖ŵƵůƟƉůĞĐŚĞĐŬĞĚďŽǆĞƐŵĞĂŶ ŵƵůƟƉůĞĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐĂƌĞďĞŝŶŐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ͘Ϳ ഩ٪EĂƟǀĞƐŽŝůƌĂŝŶŐĂƌĚĞŶ͗ ƐƋ͘Ō͘п inches deep ഩ٪ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌĞĚďŝŽƌĞƚĞŶƟŽŶ;D^ƉĞƌŵŝƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚΎͿ͗ ƐƋ͘Ō͘п inches deep ഩ٪ŝŽƐǁĂůĞ;ƐͿ͗ ƐƋ͘Ō͘ ഩ٪>ĂǁŶĂůƚĞƌŶĂƟǀĞƐ;ƌĞƉůĂĐĞƚƵƌĨŐƌĂƐƐŽƌŝŶǀĂƐŝǀĞƐǁŝƚŚƚƌĞĞƐĂŶĚŐƌŽƵŶĚĐŽǀĞƌ͕ƐŚƌƵďƐ͕ ƉĞƌĞŶŶŝĂůƐĂŶĚͬŽƌƉƌĂŝƌŝĞƉůĂŶƚƐͿ͗ ƐƋ͘Ō͘ ഩ٪tŽŽĚůĂŶĚƌĞƐƚŽƌĂƟŽŶ;ŝŶǀĂƐŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐƌĞŵŽǀĂůĂŶĚƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚͿ͗ ƐƋ͘Ō͘ ഩ٪Green roof: ƐƋ͘Ō͘ ഩ٪WĞƌŵĞĂďůĞƉĂǀĞƌƐ͗ ƐƋ͘Ō͘ ഩ٪Soil amendments: ƐƋ͘Ō͘ ഩ٪&ŝůƚĞƌƐŽĐŬƐ͗ Ō͘ ഩ٪ZŽĐŬǁĞŝƌƐ͗ Ō͘ ഩ٪ZĂŝŶǁĂƚĞƌŚĂƌǀĞƐƟŶŐ͗ĐŝƐƚĞƌŶ;ƐͿŽƌƌĂŝŶ ďĂƌƌĞů;ƐͿ͗ gallons ഩ٪Other: __________________________ ΎdŽŽďƚĂŝŶĂŶŽǀĞƌƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚĞƌD^ƉĞƌŵŝƚ͕ĐŽŶƚĂĐƚŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽĨƚŚĞĂǇĂƚ;ϯϭϰͿϳϲϴͲϮϳϬϱ͘ ϱ͘ /ƐǇŽƵƌƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƌĞƉůĂĐŝŶŐŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͍;EŽƚĞ͗ƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůǇůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĂƌĞĂƐĂƌĞEKdĞůŝŐŝďůĞͿ Lawn grass: ٪Yes ٪EŽ /ŶǀĂƐŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐΎ͗٪Yes ٪EŽ KƚŚĞƌ͖ƉůĞĂƐĞĞǆƉůĂŝŶ͗ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Ύ&ŽƌĂůŝƐƚŽĨŝŶǀĂƐŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͕ƐĞĞwww.mobot.org/rainscaping. ϲ͘ tŚŽǁŝůůŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶǇŽƵƌƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͍;ƩĂĐŚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞƉůĂŶͶƚŚŝƐŝƐĂĐƌŝƟĐĂůĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚĨŽƌĂůůĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůƐ͘Ϳ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ϳ͘ tŝůůǇŽƵďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůŝŶŐĂƌĂŝŶŐĂƌĚĞŶ͍٪Yes ٪EŽ/ĨǇĞƐ͕ǁŚĂƚǁĂƐƚŚĞƉĞƌĐŽůĂƟŽŶƚĞƐƚƌĞƐƵůƚĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƌĂŝŶŐĂƌĚĞŶ;ŝŶŝŶĐŚĞƐƉĞƌŚŽƵƌ ĚƌĂŝŶĞĚͿ͍/ŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƚĞƐƚůŽĐĂƟŽŶ;ƐͿĂŶĚƌĞƐƵůƚ;ƐͿŽŶǇŽƵƌůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚƌĂǁŝŶŐ͘;WĞƌĐ͘ƚĞƐƚŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶƐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĂƚwww.mobot.org/rainscaping.) _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ OUTREACH ϴ͘ tŝůůǇŽƵĂůůŽǁD^WƌŽũĞĐƚůĞĂƌƚŽƵƐĞƉŝĐƚƵƌĞƐĂŶĚͬŽƌŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĨƌŽŵǇŽƵƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶƉƵďůŝĐŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚĞīŽƌƚƐŽƌƉƵďůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐ͍ ٪Yes ٪EŽ – Application, page 1 of 2 – Bare ground: ٪Yes ٪EŽ WĂǀĞŵĞŶƚ͗٪Yes ٪EŽ BUDGET &ŽƵƌĐŽůƵŵŶƐĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĨŽƌŝŶƐƟƚƵƟŽŶĂůͬĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƉƌŽƉĞƌƟĞƐƐƵďŵŝƫŶŐƵƉƚŽĨŽƵƌĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐ͘hƐĞŽŶůǇŽŶĞĐŽůƵŵŶĨŽƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƉƌŽƉĞƌƟĞƐ͘ a ď cd ĞƐŝŐŶŽƐƚΨΨΨΨ tŚĂƚŝƐƚŚĞĞƐƟŵĂƚĞĚĂŵŽƵŶƚƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ͍ DĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐŽƐƚΨΨΨΨ >ĂďŽƌŽƐƚΨΨΨΨ dKd>K^dΨΨΨΨ Ψ 9. WůĞĂƐĞŶŽƚĞƚŚĂƚĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚůĂďŽƌĐŽƐƚƐĐĂŶŽŶůǇďĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝĨĂƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŶŐĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌŝƐĞŵƉůŽǇĞĚ͘/ĨĚŽͲŝƚͲǇŽƵƌƐĞůĨ;/zͿĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚͬŽƌ ŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƟŽŶŝƐĞŵƉůŽǇĞĚ͕ůĂďŽƌĐŽƐƚƐĐĂŶŶŽƚďĞƌĞŝŵďƵƌƐĞĚ͘dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƌĞŶƚĂůĨŽƌ/zƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƐŚŽƵůĚďĞůŝƐƚĞĚƵŶĚĞƌŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘ /ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ĂŶŝƚĞŵŝǌĞĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐůŝƐƚŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞĐŽƐƚƉĞƌŝƚĞŵƉĞƌĨĞĂƚƵƌĞŵƵƐƚďĞĂƩĂĐŚĞĚ͘ 9a. tŚŽĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͍;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞͿ͗පŽͲŝƚͲǇŽƵƌƐĞůĨපŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌ ϵď͘ tŚŽǁŝůůŝŶƐƚĂůůƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͍;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞͿ͗පŽͲŝƚͲǇŽƵƌƐĞůĨපŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌ 9c. /ĨƵƐŝŶŐĂĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌ͕ŶĂŵĞƚŚŽƐĞƚŚĂƚǇŽƵƉůĂŶƚŽŽƌŚĂǀĞƐŽůŝĐŝƚĞĚďŝĚƐĨƌŽŵ͘ ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ dd,DEd^ͷΈ/DWKZdEd͗ůĞĂƌůǇůĂďĞůĞĂĐŚĂƩĂĐŚŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚǇŽƵƌŶĂŵĞĂŶĚĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ͘Ή tŝƚŚƚŚŝƐĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶǇŽƵDh^dŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ ഩ٪&ŽĐƵƐƌĞĂŵĂƉ;ƐĞĞƋƵĞƐƟŽŶηϮͿ͘ ഩ٪/ƚĞŵŝǌĞĚďƵĚŐĞƚ;ŽŶĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌůĞƩĞƌŚĞĂĚŝĨƌĞƋƵĞƐƟŶŐĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌͲŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚͿ;ƐĞĞƵĚŐĞƚƐĞĐƟŽŶͿ͘ ഩ٪WůĂŶƚůŝƐƚ;ŝĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞͿŽŶĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞƐŚĞĞƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶͶĂůƐŽƚĞůůƵƐǁŚĞƌĞǇŽƵƉůĂŶƚŽƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞǇŽƵƌƉůĂŶƚƐ͗ – Application, page 2 of 2 – ഩ٪^ŽŝůĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐƚƌĂƚĞŐǇ;ŝĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞͿŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐͶŵƵůĐŚ͗ǁŚĂƚŬŝŶĚ͕ŚŽǁƚŚŝĐŬ͕ǁŚĞƌĞĨƌŽŵ͖ŝĨĐŽŵƉŽƐƚĂƉƉůŝĞĚ͗ƋƵĂŶƟƚǇ;ŝŶŝŶĐŚĞƐͿ͕ǁŚĂƚ ŬŝŶĚ͕ǁŚĞƌĞĨƌŽŵ͖ŝĨĂĞƌĂƟŽŶŵĞƚŚŽĚŝƐƵƐĞĚ͗ƚǇƉĞŽĨĂĞƌĂƚŽƌĂŶĚĚĞƉƚŚŽĨĂĞƌĂƟŽŶŝŶŝŶĐŚĞƐ͘ ഩ٪>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĚƌĂǁŝŶŐ;ƐͿͬƉůĂŶƟŶŐƉůĂŶ;ƐͿ͘;^ĞĞ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƌĂǁŝŶŐZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘Ϳ ഩ٪WŚŽƚŽŐƌĂƉŚ;ƐͿŽĨǇŽƵƌƐŝƚĞ͘WůĞĂƐĞŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͗;ϭͿ^ŚŽǁĞǆĂĐƚĨƵƚƵƌĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶ;ƐͿŽĨǇŽƵƌƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞ;ƐͿ;ǁĞŵƵƐƚďĞĂďůĞ ƚŽƐĞĞǁŚĂƚŝƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇŝŶƚŚĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶǁŚĞƌĞǇŽƵŝŶƚĞŶĚƚŽĂĚĚĂƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞͿ͖;ϮͿ^ŚŽǁƉƌŽǆŝŵŝƚǇŽĨƚŚĞĨĞĂƚƵƌĞ;ƐͿƚŽƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͖;ϯͿ /ŶĐůƵĚĞĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟǀĞůĂďĞůƐŽŶĂůůƉŚŽƚŽƐ͖;ϰͿ>ŽŽƐĞƉŚŽƚŽƐŵƵƐƚďĞĂƩĂĐŚĞĚƚŽĂŶϴЪ͟пϭϭ͟ƉŝĞĐĞŽĨƉĂƉĞƌ͘ ഩ٪Maintenance plan ഩ٪ŝŐZŝƚĞƉŚŽƚŽƐŽƌĂƉƉŽŝŶƚŵĞŶƚƉĂƉĞƌǁŽƌŬ SIGNATURE/AGREEMENT • /ŚĂǀĞƌĞĂĚĂŶĚĂŐƌĞĞǁŝƚŚĂůůD^WƌŽũĞĐƚůĞĂƌZĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ^ŵĂůů'ƌĂŶƚƐWƌŽŐƌĂŵƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ • /ĂŐƌĞĞƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƚŚĞƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞ;ƐͿĨŽƌĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨĮǀĞǇĞĂƌƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐǁĂƚĞƌŝŶŐƉůĂŶƚƐĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚŵĞŶƚƉŚĂƐĞ͕ǁĞĞĚͲ ing, pruning, annual mulching, and plant replacement as needed. • /ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŝƐƉĂƌƟĂůůǇĨƵŶĚĞĚǁŝƚŚƉƵďůŝĐŵŽŶĞǇ͕ƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞŶĂŵĞƐ͕ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚĚĂƚĂŵĂǇďĞƐŚĂƌĞĚǁŝƚŚ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐĂƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ͘ • /ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞZĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ^ŵĂůů'ƌĂŶƚƐWƌŽŐƌĂŵƉĂƌĂŵĞƚĞƌƐĂŶĚZĂŝŶ^ĐĂƉŝŶŐ'ƵŝĚĞĂƌĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĂƐŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐŽŶůǇ͘>ĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌƐĂƌĞ ƐŽůĞůǇƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞƐƵĐĐĞƐƐŽĨƚŚĞŝƌŽǁŶƌĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶƐ͘'ƌĂŶƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƉͲ ƚĂŶĐĞĨŽƌĨƵŶĚŝŶŐĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŝŵƉůǇƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ͕ĨƵŶĚĞƌ͕ŽƌƉĂƌƚŶĞƌĞŶĚŽƌƐĞŵĞŶƚŽƌƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚǇĨŽƌƉƌŽƉĞƌĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƟŽŶ͕ŽƌŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ͘ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >ĂŶĚŽǁŶĞƌƐŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ;ƐŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĞǀĞŶŝĨŶŽƚŽǀĞƌƐĞĞŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚͿ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Print name Plant Genus & Species ;>ŝƐƚĞĂĐŚƉůĂŶƚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞůǇͿ ŽŵŵŽŶEĂŵĞ YƵĂŶƟƚǇ Spacing ŽŶƚĂŝŶĞƌ^ŝǌĞ EĂƟǀĞ͍ ~}�vo}P��Z��v��]��u�o�]Pv��]vP�www.mobot.org/rainscapingX��]vP�u�� v}o�P��Zv��s � �� s and must include all of the following: ) jIndicate scale. For example, a �sP��Z��v��o�c. ) j^Z}��]��vP��o]��o]v�~oo�r��r/'rZ/dv�]o]vP�X ) j/v]��}�]�}v�}(�]��vP��v�P��}vX ) j^Z}�o}�}vU�Z�Uv]uv�]}v�}(�Z�]v��]vP(��~��}�]v�v�}]v��ooV��]��Z��(}}�P }(Z(��iv��}Z}(�Z��}v�}��]vPX ) j^Z}�o}�}v~�}(�]v��Z��vP(��~�v�Z�]�}(Z](]vo�X ) j>o��}o�}v��o}�}v~�v��o�~�]v�o�}v�}�]vP�vo}�}v~��oo��ovv�]vP�v �}v]vP��Zv�]v](�]vP�v��]vo�X ) j^Z}��o}��]vP��}��Z��}]v�}�vZ]ooX ) j^Z}��Z��ov��}]v��oovZ}�uv�}(Z�ov��]�]��}�ov��]�Zvu��].X ) j^Z}�voo��r}��]vP��X FULL ROUND ��o]�}v��]oo &��U�� Contractor and Landowner Workshops*&��lD�Z�� '�v��o]�}v�� D�Z��U�� W�}i�E}�.�}v�K�� ]o��U�� Wov�vPd]u ^��]vPv&oo�� W�}i�Z]��v}u�o�}v&}�u�� E}o��ZvK�}��U�� '�}�vd��Z]vPl}u�o�}v&}�u�W�}�� t]�Z]v��l�}(�]��}(W�}i�}u�o�}v&}�u� Grant Funds Dispersed to Landowners t]�Z]v��l�}(�]��}(W�}i�}u�o�}v&}�u� ��v�P]��}v(}�}v��}�v>v}�v�t}�l�Z}��]��]�XGo to www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain-out/rainscaping- small-grants-program/ for more details and to register. Y��}v�M}v��Z�]v��]vPZ}�o]v�~��r��}�rainscaping@mobot.org. D^W��Z��^��'��W�� Important Dates Landscape Drawing Requirements Application Checklist dŽďĞĞůŝŐŝďůĞ͕ƉůĞĂƐĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͗ ഩ٪zŽƵƌĨƵůůǇĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶ ഩ٪,ĂǀĞǇŽƵĂŶƐǁĞƌĞĚĂůůĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƋƵĞƐƟŽŶƐ͍ ഩ٪ŝĚǇŽƵƌĞŵĞŵďĞƌƚŽƐŝŐŶƚŚĞĨŽƌŵĂŶĚƉƌŝŶƚǇŽƵƌŶĂŵĞďĞůŽǁ͍ ഩ٪&ŽĐƵƐƌĞĂŵĂƉǁŝƚŚǇŽƵƌůŽĐĂƟŽŶŵĂƌŬĞĚ ഩ٪ƵĚŐĞƚĚĞƚĂŝůͶŝƚĞŵŝǌĞĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐůŝƐƚŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĐŽƐƚƉĞƌŝƚĞŵĂŶĚĨĞĂƚƵƌĞ ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƟŽŶĐŽƐƚ;ŝĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞͿ ഩ٪^ŽŝůĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐƚƌĂƚĞŐǇ;ŝĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞͿ ഩ٪WůĂŶƚůŝƐƚ;ŝĨĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞͿ ഩ٪>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚƌĂǁŝŶŐ;ƐͿǁŝƚŚĂůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐĂŶĚůĂďĞůƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ ;ĚƌĂǁŝŶŐƐŵƵƐƚďĞŶŽůĂƌŐĞƌƚŚĂŶϭϭ഼пϭϳ഼Ϳ ഩ٪WŚŽƚŽ;ƐͿĂƐƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůǇƐƉĞĐŝĮĞĚ ഩ٪Maintenance plan ഩ٪ŝŐZŝƚĞƉŚŽƚŽƐŽƌĂƉƉŽŝŶƚŵĞŶƚƉĂƉĞƌǁŽƌŬ /ŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐǁŝůůŶŽƚďĞƌĞǀŝĞǁĞĚ͘ dŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĚĞĂĚůŝŶĞĨŽƌƚŚĞ&ƵůůZŽƵŶĚŽĨƚŚĞZĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ^ŵĂůů 'ƌĂŶƚƐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŝƐDĂƌĐŚϮϬ͕ϮϬϭϱ͘ŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐDh^dďĞƉŽƐƚ- ŵĂƌŬĞĚďǇϱ͗ϬϬƉ͘ŵ͘ŽŶƚŚŝƐĚĂƚĞƚŽƋƵĂůŝĨǇ͘ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐDh^dďĞŵĂŝůĞĚŽƌŚĂŶĚͲĚĞůŝǀĞƌĞĚ͘ Electronic ƐƵďŵŝƩĂůƐǁŝůů NOTďĞĂĐĐĞƉƚĞĚ͘WůĞĂƐĞŵĂŬĞĂĐŽƉǇŽĨǇŽƵƌFULL applicaͲ ƟŽŶĨŽƌǇŽƵƌƌĞĐŽƌĚƐ͘tĞĐĂŶŶŽƚƚĂŬĞƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚǇĨŽƌĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐůŽƐƚŝŶ ƚŚĞŵĂŝů͘/ĨǇŽƵƐƵďŵŝƚǇŽƵƌĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶďǇŵĂŝů͕ŬĞĞƉǇŽƵƌƌĞĐĞŝƉƚĂƐƉƌŽŽĨ of mailing. ^ƵďŵŝƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐƚŽ͗ MSD Project Clear Rainscaping Small Grants c/o Missouri Botanical Garden – Sustainability Division CBEC – West ϰϲϱϭ^ŚĂǁůǀĚ͘ ^ƚ͘>ŽƵŝƐ͕DKϲϯϭϭϬ ůĂŶŬĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐĂƌĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĂƚD^ĂƚϮϯϱϬDĂƌŬĞƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕^ƚ͘ >ŽƵŝƐ͕DKϲϯϭϬϯŽƌĂƚƚŚĞDŝƐƐŽƵƌŝŽƚĂŶŝĐĂů'ĂƌĚĞŶ͛ƐŽŵŵĞƌĐĞ ĂŶŬĞŶƚĞƌĨŽƌ^ĐŝĞŶĐĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚϰϲϱϭ^ŚĂǁŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚ͕ or download online at www.projectclearstl.org/get-the-rain-out/ rainscaping-small-grants-program/. YƵĞƐƟŽŶƐ͍ŽŶƚĂĐƚ;ϯϭϰͿϱϳϳͲϬϮϬϮŽƌrainscaping@mobot.org. ZĂŝŶƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĐĂŶŝŶĐůƵĚĞƌĂŝŶŐĂƌĚĞŶŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƟŽŶ͖ƌĂŝŶďĂƌƌĞůƐ͖ ƚƌĞĞƐ͕ƐŚƌƵďƐ͕ĂŶĚŐƌŽƵŶĚĐŽǀĞƌ͖ƉĞƌĞŶŶŝĂůŐĂƌĚĞŶƐ͖ƵƐĞŽĨ ƉĞƌŵĞĂďůĞƉĂǀĞƌƐ͖ĂŶĚŵƵĐŚŵŽƌĞ͊'ŽƚŽwww.mobot.org/ rainscapingĨŽƌŵŽƌĞƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐĂŶĚĚĞƚĂŝůƐ͘ D^WÙÊ¹ã½ÙZ®ÄÝÖ®Ä¦^Ã½½'ÙÄãÝWÙÊ¦ÙÃ Rainscaping Model Round Recipients- Fall 2014 Grant ? Organization/Landowner Contact Name Site address Zip Proposed Features Participating Contractor Total Funding Requested Estimated Rebate Y Clay Elementary Carolyn Cosgrove Payne (Gateway Greening) 3820 N 14th St. 63107 Lawn Alternative (Prairie Garden & Tree plantings) DIY (Gateway Greening) $ 619.99 $ 605.07 Y Soulard Coop Garden Phyllis Young 905 Lami St. 63104 Lawn Alternative (Prairie Dropseed Plantings) DIY $ 2,702.00 $ 2,286.40 Y St. Elizabeth Mother of John the Baptist Mary Densmore 4746 Carter Ave. 63115 Rainwater harvesting (2 500 gallon tanks) Rainwater Harvesting Supply Co., LLC $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Y St. Matthew the Apostle Church Fr. Pat Quinn 2715 N. Sarah 63113 2 Rain gardens, 2 Rain barrels Hartke Nursery $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Y St. Matthew the Apostle Church Fr. Pat Quinn 2715 N. Sarah 63113 8 Rain barrels w/ small planting Hartke Nursery $ 2,971.00 $ 2,971.00 Y Clyde C. Miller Career Academy Brittany Hoover 1000 N. Grand Blvd. 63106 Rain Garden Gardening Angel Landscaping $ 2,827.00 $ 2,795.00 Y Clyde C. Miller Career Academy Brittany Hoover 1000 N. Grand Blvd. 63106 Lawn Alternative Gardening Angel Landscaping $ 2,205.00 $ 2,205.00 Y Clyde C. Miller Career Academy Brittany Hoover 1000 N. Grand Blvd. 63106 Rain Garden Gardening Angel Landscaping $ 2,440.00 $ 2,440.00 Rainscaping Small Grants Program Recipients- Full Round, Spring 2015 Grant? Organization Last Name First Name Street Zip Features Participating Contractor Bid/ DIY Estimated initial total cost Estimated rebate request Y - As LA Eichler Tim & Jeanne 2944 Milton Blvd 63104 Lawn Alternative (150), Rain Barrels (200) DIY $3,989.00 $3,000.00 Y - As LA Herzog Academy Elementary School Greenwater Solutions 5854 Pamplin Ave. 63147 Lawn Alternative (333) Hartke Nursery (P), Seal Co (R) (Non Participating Contractor), Green Turf (E) $4,721.62 $3,000.00 Y - As LA St. Stanislaus Kostka Polish Catholic Church Mindak Randy & Christine 1413 N. 20th Street 63106 Lawn Alternative (300) Gardening Angel Landscaping $2,753.00 $2,753.00 Y Aeme Jo 2908 Russell 63104 Rain Garden (81), Lawn Alternative (513), Woodland Restoration (24) DIY 1 Hartke Nursery $3,514.63 $3,000.00 Y Allen Jason 4138 Russell Blvd 63110 Lawn Alternative (523), Rain Barrels (150) DJM $3,113.83 $3,000.00 Y Beals Kurt 4032 Connecticut St. 63116 Lawn Altemative (280) Hartke Nursery $3,278.43 $3,000.00 Y Bittie Richard 2320 Whittlemore Place 63104 Rain Garden (161), Lawn Alternatives (73) Glorious Gardens Inc. $3,875.00 $3,000.00 Y Boevingloh Claire 7231 Winchester Drive 63121 Rain Garden (150), Lawn Alternative (550) Sherwood's Forest $3,233.00 $3,000.00 Y Brickey Michael 3147 Mt. Pleasant St. 63111 Lawn Alternative (135), Rain Barrels (110), Other (478g) Simply Sustainable Landscaping $1,867.69 $1,867.69 Y Bunse / Peterein Aaron / Michelle 4327 McRee Ave. _ 63110 Lawn Alternative (550), Green Roof (32), Rain Barrels (330) Horstmann Brothers LLC / Green Roof Blocks $7,546.00 $3,000.00 Y Clemens Diane 3670 Flora Place 63110 Woodland Restoration (315), Green Roof (90), Permeable Pavers (300) DIY / Green Roof Blocks / Non Participating Contractor $3,919.00 $3,000.00 Y Crawford Katherine 4332 Hartford St. 63116 Lawn Alternative (360), Rain Barrels (110) Simply Sustainable Landscaping $3,462.60 $3,000.00 Y Deem Jessica 3144 Illinois Ave. 63118 Rain Garden (200), Lawn Alternative (850), Permiable Pavers (60) DIY / DJM Ecological Services $3,949.00 $3,000.00 Y White Box Take-out Cafe Deem Jason 2622 Cherokee St. 63118 Green Roof (320) DIY / DJM Ecological Services $4,297.00 $3,000.00 Y White Box Take-out Cafe Deem Jason 2622 Cherokee St. 63118 Green Roof (160) DIY 1 DJM Ecological Services $2,086.00 $2,086.00 Y White Box Take-out Cafe Deem Jason 2622 Cherokee St. 63118 Green Roof (160) DIY / DJM Ecological Services $2,086.00 $2,086.00 Y Deiort Lucas 3501 Califomia 63118 Rain Garden (280), Bioswale (150), Rain Barrels (250) DIY $3,006.44 $3,000.00 Y Multifamily Densmore Mary 1829 A N 18th St. 63106 Rain Barrels (500g) Colonel Landscaping $1,790.00 $1,790.00 Y Compton Heights Neighborhood Betterment Association Doggett Larry 2904 Allen Ave 63104 Lawn Alternative (2340) Hartke Nursery $3,479.35 $3,000.00 Y Compton Heights Neighborhood Betterment Association Doggett Larry 2905 Allen Ave 63104 Lawn Alternative (900) Hartke Nursery $2,735.71 $2,735.71 Y Evans Paul 4122 Flora Place 63110 Lawn Alternative (220), Rain Barrel (170) DIY $925.56 $925.56 Y Femandez Matthew 1227 N. Market Street 63106 Rain Garden (100), Permeable Pavers (250) DIY $4,147.00 $3,000.00 Y Herzog Academy Elementary School Greenwater Solutions 5852 Pamplin Ave. 63147 Embankment Rain Garden (400) Hartke Nursery $2,780.30 $2,780.30 Y Haines Toni 4103 Castleman Ave. 63110 Lawn Alternative (855) DIY $712.34 $712.34 Y Harris Hudson & Melanie 4126 Botanical Ave. 63110 Lawn Alternative (325), Rain Barrels (110) Simply Sustainable Landscaping $4,066.40 $3,000.00 Y Hatfield/Ladd Michelle/Kyle 3771 Potomac 63116 Rain Garden (77), Bioswale (28), Permeable Pavers (33), Rain Barrels (110) DIY $1,622.25 $1,622.25 Y Henderson Shelley 2141 S. Jefferson Ave 63104 Rain Garden (200), Lawn Alternatives (135), Permeable Pavers (390) _ DIY $3,575.00 $3,000.00 Y Multifamily Henderson Shelley 2145 S. Jefferson Ave 63104 Green Roof (168), Rain Barrels (130) Green Roof Blocks $2,904.50 $2,904.50 Y Multifamily Henderson Shelley 2145 S. Jefferson Ave 63104 Green Roof (180), Rain Barrels (68) Green Roof Blocks $2,909.50 $2,909.50 Y Horwedel Timothy & Lyndsay 4179 Castleman Ave 63110 Lawn Alternatives (254), Permeable Pavers (131), Rain Barrels (55g) Quiet Village Landscaping $4,795.30 $3,000.00 Y Ibendahi Stephen 3922 Cleveland Ave. 63110 Rain Barrels (150) Green Turf $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Y Jezreel Fielding 4206 Shaw Blvd 63110 Lawn Alternative (250), Permeable Pavers (188) DIYI Quiet Village Landscaping $4,062.45 $3,000.00 Y Kelley Steve 4940 Botanical Ave 63110 Lawn Alternative (247), Rain Barrels (220) Simply Sustainable Landscaping $5,016.50 $3,000.00 Y King Kevin 804 Ann 63104 Lawn Alternative (730), Rain Barrels (100) Non Participating Contractor (Native Landscaping by Jeanne) $2,756.00 $2,756.00 Y Ranken Technical College Kriesel Kevin 4431 Finney Ave 63113 Engineered Bioretention (1423) Non Participating Contractor (Musick) $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Y BluCity Spaces Leabman Gary 210 N. 17th 63103 Bioswale (500) Filter Socks (10) Horstmann Brothers LLC $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Y Lehman Anne 3911 Juniata St. 63116 Lawn Alternative (165), Rain Barrels (110) Simply Sustainable Landscaping $2,877.67 $2,877.67 Y Lewin Judy 4964 Columbia Avenue 63139 Rain Garden (101) Horstmann Brothers LLC $2,640.00 $2,640.00 Y Multifamily Lewin Judy 4959 Magnolia Avenue 63139 Rain Garden (110) Horstmann Brothers LLC $2,225.00 $2,225.00 Y Thomas Dunn Learning Center Madden Shawn 3113 Gasconade 63118 Rain Barrels (50g) DIY $500.00 $500.00 Y Maneely Eric & Kate 4040 Connecticut St. 63116 Lawn Alternative (150), Permeable Pavers (200), Rain Barrels (100) Undecided/DIY $4,232.68 $3,000.00 Y McMullan Ryan 3320 Selena St. 63118 Lawn Alternative (154), Rain Barrels (1050) Colonel Landscaping $2,577.54 $2,577.54 Y Moll Rachel & Jeremy 4979 Odell Street 63139 Rain Garden (60), Lawn Alternative (430) Sherwood's Forest $3,169.61 $3,000.00 Y Page Robin 4140 Shenandoah Ave 63110 Lawn Alternative (191), Rain Barrels (110) Simply Sustainable Landscaping $3,781.00 $3,000.00 Y Pearson Dan 4170 Wyoming St. 63116 Rain Garden (72), Bioswale (103), Lawn Alternative (498), Rain Barrels (250) Horstman Brothers, LLC./ Rainwater Harvesting Supply Co., LLC $2,961.41 $2,961.41 Y Pona Kevin 5366 Reber Place 63139 Rain Garden (103) Horstmann Brothers LLC $2,433.00 $2,433.00 Y Pyle Ashley 3410 Halliday Ave. 63118 Lawn Alternative (112), Rain Barrels (300) Colonel Landscaping $3,085.00 $3,000.00 Y Quinn Michael 1219 Dolman Street 63104 Rain Garden (294) Sherwood's Forest / DIY $2,488.19 $2,488.19 Y Schacht Megan 3142 Iowa Ave. 63118 Lawn Alternative (610) Simply Sustainable Landscaping $3,637.00 $3,000.00 Y Shah Neha 3126 Lackland Ave 63116 Rain Garden (80), Lawn Alternative (45), Bioswale (20), Rain Barrels (110) Simply Sustainable Landscaping $3,187.00 $3,000.00 Y Vogler Joanne (Jody) 2050 Switzer Ave. 63136 Rain Garden (320), Permeable Pavers (125), Rain Barrels (280) DIY/ Colonel Landscaping / Rainwater Harvesting Supply Co. LLC $3,029.75 $3,000.00 $134,831.66 Waiting List (funding pending on others opting out) WL 4 St. Margaret of Scotland Parish O'Toole Fr. Matthew _ 3964 Castleman Rain Barrels (58) Green Turf $2,415.00 $2,415.00 Rainscaping Small Grants Program Recipients- Full Round, Spring 2015 Grant? Organization Last Name First Name Street Zip Features Participating Contractor Bid/ DIY Estimated initial total cost Estimated rebate request $3,000.00 WL 2 Multifamily Lewin Judy 4959 Magnolia Avenue Permeable Pavers (105) Hortsmann Brothers LLC $3,000.00 WL 1 Multifamily Densmore Mary 1827 N 18th St. Rain Barrels (500g) Colonel Landscaping $1,790.00 $1,790.00 WL 5 Haertling Wanda 7330 Virginia Ave. Bioswale (275) DIY $900.00 $900.00 WL 6 Newsham Michael 3806 Humphrey St. Lawn Alternative (137), Rain Barrels (165) RF Landscape Services $2,050.00 $2,050.00 WL 3 Herzog Academy Elementary School Greenwater Solutions 5851 Pamplin Ave. Rain Barrels (300) Green Turf $3,000.00 $3,000.00, APPENDIX DD PILOT LARGE SCALE MAPS AMENDED SOIL PACKAGE #2 CLINTON ST. RAIN GARDENIN OLD NORTH N. SARAH ST. RAIN GARDENIN THE VILLE GERALDINE AVE. RAIN GARDENIN MARK TWAIN HARLAN AV. LOT-SCALERAIN GARDEN IN BADEN BEACON AVE. RAIN GARDENIN WALNUT PARK EAST MONROE ST. LOT-SCALE RAIN GARDENSIN OLD NORTH N. VANDEVENTER AVE. RAIN GARDENIN JEFFVANDERLOU HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PLANTER BOXESIN JEFFVANDERLOU AMENDED SOIL PACKAGE #1 WARNE AVE. RAIN GARDEN IN O'FALLON 9THHALLOLIVEUNIONLE E ARSENAL COMPTONLINDEL L 20THB LA IR DELMARGOODFELLOW 4THPINE SHAW FYLER CASS SIDNEY IOWABA T E S CO O K LAFAYETTE NEBRASKA10TH2NDVANDEVENTERLOCUS T LOUISIANAPERNOD ETZEL 39THDALE 3RDBE L L 18THCA R T E R MINNESOTAS W I T Z E R MCLA R A N RI D G E PRARI E MORGAN FORDOAKLAND MARDEL CLAYT O N EV A N S MA F F I T T LA B A D I E 1STCALIFORNIABELTCOLEEUCLID GUSTINEME R A M E C 11THPE N R O S E FIN N E Y AL D I N E 19thSUBLETTEGLASGOWBRANNONKIENLENST L O U I SJANET MICHIGANFLAD MINERVA WATSON HELENDELOR SHREVERUSSELL LACLE D E ITASKA BENTON OSAGE R I V E R D E S P E R E S 7THWALSH MACKLIND12THJENNINGS STATIONSPRINGMIMIKAVIRGINIAWREN CARR BENTAS H L A N D BOYLEPEST A L O Z Z I LEMPFERGUSONDEVONSHIRE ERACOLUMBIA WYOMING WEST PARK MAGNOLIA RHODESPENNSYLVANIA WA B A D A NOTTINGHAM BIRCHER KO S S U T H B R A N C H ELLIOTLIL L I A N 8THROGERNEWSTEADELLENWOOD ANG ELI C A ENRIGHT HARTFORD JOHNG E R M A N I A WHITTIERBECK PARK 21STTAMMGANOROSA PLOV E R ADEL AI D E LANSDOWNE WELLS THRU S H IDAHOMY R O N REGALBARTMER SEMPLEWINONA BURDNEOSHO CHEST N U TWESTBEAC O N WISEMILENTZ MADIS O NHAMILTONFORSYTH OAK HILLTOWER GROVEWILBORNCLARALINTONDETONTY ALASKAMcCAUSLANDCHRISTYGOETHE ANNCORASOUTHW E S T SWAN SCANLAN ODELL BI N G H A MMCCAUSLAND TARABART O NWARNECHURCH BIDDLE LAMINEWBYROBI N FRANK L I N ST CHA R L E S BL O W D O V E R THOLOZANSUTTERWYDOWN CATESEAST MACKENZIEBELLEVUEEADSHODIAMONT OBEARARCO CLEMENS DESOTO25THTEXASFOLSOM HO L L Y H I L L S MCREE FINKMAN KLEMMSALISB U R Y BAYARDBR O W N MURDOCH RUS KI N EDI S O N L Y N C H GA R F I E L D AUBERTMAIN GOVE R N M E N T EME R S O N BANCROFT RAYWI L M I N G T O N GEN E VI E V E CAR RI E TA F T TH EK L A TE R R Y ELTONHAR RI S CAROL I N E PARKER SHARPCLAXT O N ALFREDHUNT ALLE N KEOKUK H O R D FERR Y IR O N OHIO19THDAGGETT DUNCA N HARNEY BRADLEY DUNNICA LLOYD JUNIATA FLETAGARRISONALIC E PAPIN P A S A D E N A BACONWISCONSINDOCK B U LW ER FIELDALCOT T SETH TAYL O R BU R G E N MIAMI CLEVELAND WHERRYHOLL YACME WALN U T UTAH WHARFPARNELLETHEL FLOYYALELINDENWOOD SUNBURYMCKINLEY B R I D G E AD A MARYL A N D CLARK MARINEBE S S I E THOMAS CHOUT E A U ROSA L IE DAVI S O N LISETTE FAIRVIEW ARLI N GT O N BO W E N AN D E R S O N TENNESSEESUTTONGLA D Y S MCK I S SOC K WASHINGTON PA L M CLIFTONPECKSPRUCE HA V E N SUTHERLAND MCKINLEY LAMBDINEASTSO U T H Q U I N C Y POTOMAC WANDAAL M A CANAAN LANGLEY MEMORIALEAST NORTH LEONOR K SULLIVAN37THKINGSLANDBEGGCALV A R Y HORNSBY STAELY POP EMAYWOOD HOFFMAN LIN C O L N FALLVERO N I C A THURMANARUNDEL MENARDWILCO XGRAHAMTRINITYROBBINS WALL SMILEY SC H I L L E R HUMPHREY GR E E R GER AL DI N E J E N W O O D DODIE R GRANDFA R L I NNELSON R O B E R T APRICOTOAKW O O D LO T U S ACADEMYMELBAELIAS MATHILDADARBY14THM O T T PERSHING ARKANSASSHERIDAN BROADWAYORIOLEILLINOISJU L I A N TYLER TH E O D O R E TH E O D O S I A LAWRENCEWARRE NCOLONIAL EIL E RPENDLETONOLEATHA ABERDEEN MC P H E R S O N GRESHAM M ELVINULENAMARCONIGASCONAD EEDGEWOOD MARQUETTE KENWOOD ALAMO BREME NPAMPLIN BILLUPSCO T T A G ETEMPLE HOOVER GEYE R ARENDESDEL NORTESNOWST R A T F O R D PR ANG E MARMADUK E VASELVISTA CLAYJUNE TURNERLE D U C70TH GILESFABER VESTRAVI N IA LAWLEREI C H E L B E R G E R 6THGROVEOUID A VERMONTDERBY NASHVILLE SHENANDOAH ADKINSBERTHOLD ALABAMAEDWARDSAUG U S T A ALBIALORAN GILM O R E DOLMANTHROOP OXFORDCLARENCESA L O M A PLYMOUTH WEIL NORWOODGENESTARAYMOND AUDRAIN ORAN ATHL O N E GAYOLA B E R N A R D EM M A BADE N BISSEL L ZEPHYR GARNER ARTHUR ACORNFLETCHERSAMUE L S H E P A R D DELMONTRED B U D PLAINVIEW LOUIS JA M I E S O NLOUISVILLE CLARENDONWATERMAN DELORE NORTHR U PRAVENWOOD COLEMANDALTONM A R I O NASTRANORFOLK DAYTON ALBERTA LA U R A MAPLE NO R T H L A N D GAMBLEWILLIAMSL E X A BEAUMONTPARTRIDGEMAY E M I L Y C D B A N K S FAIRWINDSORGLADES WILL M OR ELILLYCLINTO N CONNECTICU T S E I B E R T DAHLIA SELLS COLORADOKEMPSTEPHEN JONESMORASU N S H I N E MAIDE N O L D E N B U R G BLACKSTONEMARCUSWATTSPIERCEHICK O R Y NAGELBERGER HALLADAYFAULKNER DEWEYHOYTMORTONPRAGUEWADE C I R C L E VI E WEADS BRIDGE M A R K E T MAURYDEBALIVIERE LONGFELLOW ELLIOTTPATTISON PRATHERMISSISSIPPIR O M A I N E SHAWMUTEDNAGARYLE X I N G T O N RANKENHARLAN KENSINGTON HANCOCK GIBSO N PLEASANT38THBAMBERGERPEYTONLEO N AABNERMA R G E MANOLAPORTISELM BE U L A HHERN BISHOP P L SCOTTH E I D E L B E R G 67THBEACHWOOD69THEL M B A N K LAKEGIMBLI N SCOTT68TH HOWA R D CHILDRESS RO L A N DWACO EL W A R D VERNON ANGEL R O D T D E G I V E R V I L L E DRURYHIG H L A N D DESTR E H A N SH U L T E FE D E R E R G L E N E C H O LOWELLLELANDTHEATER KINGSBURY LU C I L L E DE MUNLEADAL E FR E N C H BRUNO FL O R I A N HAWTHORNE SPENCER S A N DIE G O GEIGER BONITAHILLS W E S T NORTH RO O S E V E L T TEAL COUNTRYCL U B EUGENEGRAPECASTLEMAN WESTSOU T H GRATI O TGAST MCNAIRWESTMINSTE R KEMPER SALENAH E E G E HYAMSBELLERIVEFORESTDRESDENC E C IL KING S DR MARTIN LUTH E R K I N G ROSEDALE H I L D A RUTGE R RICHMOND LINK HOLTOFALL O N MELROSE MANHATTA N MONTG O M E R Y ROBERTS DA W S O N AVONDALE59THBLAS E MCDONALD HENRIETTA MAXWELL NO R T H P O I N T E RUPERT P R IMM PILOT16THSPROULEEL L A ELSARAUSCHENBACHBUCHA N A N LYNDOVER LIVINGSTONSUM M IT WAGN E R SALOMENEWPORTMAYLORCHATH A M MCCUNE 22NDUNIVE R S I T Y 66THIDL E W I L D HOBAR T COLLINSHE R B E R T MONTCLAIRL A K E W O O D EMERLING PI C A D I L L Y DUR A N T FLORA VINE F O X C ROFT MO U N T EWINGGL E N M O R E INDIANAHEREFORDCARDINALH A M B U R G TERRI LYNN ST F E R D I N A N D WALLA C E CU P P L E SVALLE GANN E T T TULANE ESTHERREBERNIXON C O N D E LAFLINLEBAN O N OSCE O L AHATZ GR E E N L E A COLOGNEDILLONST VINCENTSALZMAN ELGINVILLA VICTORIA EDMUNDARLMONTRIDGEDALER O S W E L L CABANNE CARLSBADDELAVANPHILBROOKSAVIO LE N A E L W O O D F E R RIS DEKALBLOUG H BOROUGHLUCASSHEPLEY AVI S HA M M E T T ANNA H A N N O V E R WALDO LOOP AGNESERICK T E HUNTLEYQUE E N S RAMP I 7 0 M A NETTEPHILOSA P P H I R E HORTON GRAMOND WE L L S M A R SYLVANTORII KRAFTGAY O V E RBRO O K RO S L Y N VAILCA L V I N 13THNAVAJOESARAHANDOVER FL O R E N C E SHIRL E Y ANNIE MALONEPORTLAND C H A N D L E R CHAMBERLAIN GREGGGE R T R U D E GOEN E RALAMEDA 15THST ANGEROSELANDMCMILLAN PER R Y ROXIED O R C A S G U STAV LODE CERR E MARILL A C GR E E N W A Y MAURICEJAMES AMANDA MARY TEDMARPARISIRA DOD D RI D G EHOLBORN S T E LMO VERA GA R E S C H E KEITH IRVINGTALMAPINE GROVEMONTROSELEOLAGREGANHILLSDA L E CLEVEDONBROCKSTOLL E HIGH MILLS MA R G A R E T T A L EAHY GREENWOOD HE B E R T A L L EM AN I AURSULA THAT C H E R WALDEMAR PARKVI E W SOUTHLANDSUBURBAN DAIBE R HIVIE W LAL I T E SOUTHERN C O M M O N W E A L T HEMILIETO E N G E S TY R O L E A NROWAN GRATTANMALLIN C K R O D T HUM B O L D T GOFF SARPYSALERNOHARVARDBELRUE JOSEPHINE BAKERASHBY ORC H I D MARSHALLOREON CINTRAWHITNEY BE L L ELULUA V I E LEROYMULLANPHY LO M B A R D KOS CI USK O NORTH CORONADOEV A R T S MATH E W OGDENROTHGR O V E L A N D NEWH O U S E LE S C H E N MARWINETTEWES C OTT COCH R A N ACCOMACKNOXWILSON JOELETONSULLIV A N STIVER S C A R R LANECORNELL STAN W O O D HOOKE CHAMB E R S EU N I C E MACKAYL OC K E FAM O U SST ANNSELLENDALEROLLAPHILLIPSDEVLIN WITHNELLSHANNONRO H N CUTTERMCKEAN JANE NORTHCRESTST E I N S Z E A L A N D SIGELANNETTABITT N E R FLORIDA CHRI S TI A N DEER PATH OCTAVIABLAINE K O E L NBERMUDAAMHERST C O N C O R D I A HOGANOAKRIDGEVE T T E R GAYLORDFAUQUIER KE N N E R L Y KI N A M O R E DARDENNEARMAND A K I N S KO R T E RANKINHALEYCOLBYU P T O NHEMAN RAMPI44BELDONOT T O ALE X A N D E R LUCYMI N N I E HATHERLYLA M O NTSTODDARD DUGAN WITH E R S CORBITT SH E R M A N TI E M A N NHIGHF IELD RI D G E V IE W SHA RONLONGRIDGEC A R O N D E L E T TALC O T T MONI T E A U FO R E S T H I L L WINCHESTER ACACI A ALPHAG R A C E KENTUCKYPE G G Y OAKDALEVARRELMANNWINNEBAGO JOSEPH RUTHSANFORDJAMES COOL PAPA BELLMCART H U R CHERRYOXEYE LA VETA O AK PARKWOODBELWOOD POP L A ROAKVIEWHAYWOODGARVIN P A I SLEYSTANFORD DRYDENCOLLEGE DEERWOOD ART HILLDARTMO O R MARNICEDRESSELLJULESHIAWATHA N I N A NO R M A N D YWELEBA RA N D A L L MORI N OAKKNOLLSA N F R A N C I S C O A R D S L E Y WI L L O W W O O D RAMP I 5 5 BAYV O N P H U L WO O D L A N D L I LBURNNORWAY SEN A T E DOLAN HALFS O U L A R DMABELPADDINGTON HILDESHEIMCI RCLEPE LHAM CE D A R CATA LI N A BRITTINAM E L I A JANUARYG R I M S H AW L I N D B E R GHPON C E CO N T O U R HAZENP E B B LE HILL A R C H WOODHAZELWABA SH GARTH KINSEY BAL F O U R COLT O N SH E R R Y W OODROW GREENH AVEN VERLOLDE ENGLISHRAFTDARTMOUTH LANHAM J E F F E RSONCL A R E M O R E CAMELLIAPRIVATEJE S S E J A C K S O N SUNSET SA C R A M E N T O IVANHOEOVERLEAHE N D E R S O N CREST HILLERLEN O X GREENDALE GRAVOISDONALDP R E S CO T T FARRA G U T SE LBE R BENMORESEATTLEBLENDONBUCKNERFRE DE RI CK COLFAXMELVILLESCHOLLMEYE RPURCELL ARDENFAI R F A XROSEBUD ECOFFLONKARFA S S E N FA R L E Y THRESADARTFORDSOUTHWOOD MOUNT PLE A S A N T A LGERNON MOELLENHOFFESTERBROOK BELAIRERUDDY BENNETTNORDICAVALON MONTANAARBOR 23RDDA M A T O MAYBERRYSTEFFENS A U S TR I A ELLINGTON FRA NCIS WESTGATEMENOLABE E T H O V E N AL B R I G H T JENNY KA Y HADLEYCAPEHARTMY R T L E COUNCIL GROVEWESTMORELA N D PEARLWEL D O N P R E S I D E N TGRANVILLE CRANEOSBORNSCOVILLPAT T O N VIV IA NM ITC HE LL NORWALK COLLETTA GILSONMARKTWAINCARLLAMMERT YORKWA R W I C K HILLS L A N D PROSPECTWYNHILL CARSON HE N N E R YATESFAIR C H I L D AGAT E R M MOORENORTHWOOD KATHLEENPLATEAU WELLSTONRAVENHILLMILTONST RITALIMITLUDWIGLAWNRAMSEYM A R IL A C HORNER RAC QU E T EVERGREENTILLIE HUN T I NGTON T E S S O N PRI N C E T ON BELLE GLADESULPHURHARMONYSADLERLOGAN KENEWAH WILLARD MAU R E R VASSARLE O N O R APARCHESTER BOTANICAL LASALL EIONACO T E B R I L L I A N T E BROOKL Y N SCHOFIELD WARNER WINCHELSEADUKE HELMONEILLLA BELLEBRENTMOOR C A R R O L L VICTORBOLES SLATTERYH U M M E L S H E I M DARVERFARRA R ARCADIA ROCKDALESTRODTMAND A R D A N E L L A GRA N A DA DELTA S I M PS ON C H E RO K E ERYAN LIERMANN KLOCKE CANTON DEMPSEY SP R I N G D A L E M A R I E T T A HEN R Y BONETAFIL L M O R E B RISTOL C R E S TONANITA DEERBE L L E D R I V E PRESE R V A T I O NRUSHBURRWOOD RO C K B R O O K OUTERPIN E R I D G E 17THEDWINNONIE SOUTHVINE GROVEMONRO E WENZLICKFARRELLBE R N H A R D T ALBION S A LZBURGERRICHERTHAYSFOREST VIEW WICHIT A BISHOPS WEST P I N E FAIRMOUNTWOLZ DICK GREGORYHI L L CAMBRIDGE KI NGWOODSCHOO L JU L I A MALLARD DAKOTACRESTLAND CON G R E S S LO R R A I N E SEMINARY CREI GHTONFR I E D A S T I L LW E L L TROOSTVASSIERPA U L I A NWOODRUFF KLEINCURRYST P A U L HOSP I T A L CRESCENT VIL L E LOHMEYER MARLI NGAINE F L O R I S S HYDRAULICMOLLER HOR T E N S ELEVERETTESTATLER BAGL E Y B E ACHGLADSTONEPONTIACHOLYOKE LIBERTYVOLO LACEYCHILD R E N ' S MAYF I E L D GRAYMCGEEMISSOURIMILFORDUPSHAWBARROLEN E LOWENMAYFAIRN AC O MIS CUSHIN GTHORNBYWE S T B E L L EST MARYSFAIRHAVE N SA N BONITA WILLETTO AKLEYP A R K R I D G E SA N T A M O N I C A N O R S T E A D BE R T H A OREGONENGELHOLMROSEWOODT R E M O N T BARBARACRITTENDEN MARY E L L E N VIENNAJACOBSOLDCOALWINDERMERE KENNETT DEMENILISA B E L L A JACKSON ROSSITERBAI L E Y RAVENSCROFT BLAKEMOREWALKERWHALEYCAM P B ELL VILLANOVA TROY RANCHWOOD NEW ASHLANDLAURELWALTONMURPHYKIRK L A N D CHAPL IN GERRITTELIZABETH AU D R E Y BROOKINGSGRIEFIELD JASPER PARKROSEBUR Y BRENNAN RICH A R D PULASKI EVELINE QUEENT E R R A C E RE D E R WRIG H T THERESATRAINORCAMDEN S C H I R M E R DURYEAWESTW A YDA M ON MOR AI N EATWATER HUNTERSIEMERSCARDW ELLS U S O N FENDLERELMERCRICKETKENNETHC O R Y FROWW A K O N D A HERMITAGEO'FALL O N GR A N D E L S Q U A R E BRETT H U L L RADOMARONIAFERNWELMERING THEOBALD SKYVIEW GUI LFORDFE R D I N A N D JONESBISCHOFF JORDANFREMONT WILLIAMKUHSFORDEY KNAPPB E L L E RI V EACRES HILGARD LAT T AMACLARE LAVENDERGRUNERHIGGINSCRANSTONALVA P O E P I N G LABEAUM E P O I N T V I E W EITMAN CHARITON HUMME L S H I E L D S GREE N H O L L YHUGHESMA R C E L I N EBAINBRIDGEOAKMOUNT TILDENACKERTWALKWAYSAN JACINTODICKSON WINWARD EL MORO HURSTINTERDRIVEC R O S S MONTGARDENHILLMONTAGUEALHAMBRARAMPSPRUCESTMU R R A Y GATESWORTHTALMAG E SWE RI N G E N N OR MA N D ALE R A M P K IN G S H IGHWAY BLVDL E E D A L E A U B U R NSTANLEY S T ANDRE W S NOONANGIE S E K I N G APPLE V ALLEYHARLEQUINKAHNSBA RKENCEDARWOODWAGELEYLAKE P A R K GRANTTENNISSYRACUSEAMMANN NE W C O M B STEINLAGESINGL E T O NCANTERBURYSILVERTON HOPERULE WYNWOODSELBYSAVOY STADIUMPLAZABL U E S P R U C E B A L S O N FARAWAY LESP E R A N C EBYRONRAMPLAFAYETTEAVEDONO V A NARCOLAEV A N S T O N GURNEYL A C O R N NORINE BERR A NA Y L O RLAUDERDALE GRAND F OREST VIRGILS T J A ME S ES S E X D ONCASTER BEVERLYHOMELA N D KOSCUISKOSTEPHENTRAFFORDS O UTHMOOR AL B E R I C I S I G N A L H ILL BARTMER INDUST R I A LKATHERINE PRESTONAL C L A R ELARCH PRINTZNEONAPOINC I A N A DIANTHUSLU C E R N E HAZELWOOD ATHERSTONE SCH R O E D E R DIANTHANGARNIERLACKLANDS T ANSBURY S O P E R IDA D A L E CHARLESS COMMERCIALDUNLEER EAGLEV A L LE Y DOU GL A S S SPARTA DES PERESSTEWARTLOWERYCENTER REINEKEGRANDBERRY OLYMPIANJAMES A HARVEYCENTRALARDE E HEGERPARCRIDGEPARKDALEBRETONEMM E T BENEDIC T MARTHACRO S S OAK GROVESCHAEFFERK E NNE D Y CU BAHIGHLAND PAR K R A M P G R A V O IS R D AURO R A MCGI R KWA L T E R WHITTEMOR EBISHOPJAJOHN S ON PRO V E N C H E R ESEXAUERWILLOWTREE C O O LV A L L E Y PO W E R S RA INORWEST BILLONNEIERSTRATHMORET U S C AN YMISSION VALLEYMOUN D BLANDFO R D ARCHIVESCOR N E LI A J U D ITHBALDWINMAZEJESSICARAMP I6 4 NAD INE DRMARTINLUTHERKI NGBRI DGEMARGARETENGL E W O O D COMMODOREBOARDMANRID G E H AVEN EUGE N I APARKLANDFINE ARTSWO O D D A L E CATALPAMORRI S O N NORTHMOOR BU C KIN GHAM CENTERCROSSM O L L JEANENECURTIS ARCHWAY MANORBELRIDGEMOTARDCHEVROLETLEONARDGREENP O R T WALBRIDGEMORGAN HUDLERCA H O K I A LY N F I E L D DU C K W O R T H BRAMLAGECENTRAL CROSSPIC K E R ELTORA CHURCH BELLBOWMANAL B E R T I N E PEABODYREDFIELD HAMPS HI R E MELWOODGRANDVIEWCAVERIDGEWOODVOERSTERELENOREMYRLETTEEASTGATEFAIR RIDGELY N H AVEN HI POINTETUXEDO GARDE N VI L L E HEMPSTEA D WA L L I N G F O R D WAVERLYM I D O R I FRANKEFORESTRIDGE K E N R I C K CASTLE PARK ST E D W A R D JO H A N N A LA JARA MINO MA WICKLOWWES T E R H O F F ME D E R E R PUTNAMST BERNARDDELAWARECASTL E LAVERNELL ADELINE RIVER BLUFFTOLMANNORMA LEFFINGWELLJOSEPHINEL INDEN LA SALL E P A R K F R A N K F O R T BARTLELO U I S A PO M O N A MAEZEP O E P P I N G PROVIDENCE CO N V E N T MCCULLAGHMOBILEWEST E N T E R A N C EHOUSTONNORMANDYTRACEPL E A S E W A Y VANDERBURGHFON T B O N N E NORTH HILLOA K C R E S T SOUTH 7THWHITTIEROGDENEADS EN R I G H T WATERMAN PARKVI E W PRINCETON 2 1 S T NEWPORT22NDD O V E R MEL R O S E EA STG ATEDAKOTA HARRISMCPHERSON 13THLO T U S RUSSELLARLINGTON VICTOR KE N N E R L Y PENR O S E MELVILLE13THHADLEYOHIOCOLONIALPERSHINGARLMONT WESTMINSTER 38THLAKEP A R K D A L E PRIVATER U SSELL GERRITTCOLLEGEMAGNOLIA MISSOURI18THUTAH OFALL O N BISHOPS HYDRAULICWISE CLAYGR E E R 10THEIL E R GEIGER TAYLORLEONAHA R N E Y SPRINGHAMILTON19THALBIARUTG E RTRAFFORD TERRA C E R A M P I4 4 PARKWOODMARYL A N D PRANGE 6THLASALL E HYDRAULICSPRING7THTO E N G E S MARQUETTE PERSH I N G REBER RAMPKINGSH IG H W A Y B L V D ILLINOISSA N F R A N C I S C O HAWTHORNE37THFAIRVIEW JUNIATA FIL L M O R E EMILIE CARR WINONA FLORA GIMBLI N RADOMDELMA R CARROLL PE N R O S E SAN BONITA ALEXANDERSNOW MAGNOLIA REBER SA C R A M E N T O ODELL YATESWINONA ARMANDEWINGCALIFORNIA 2NDDE L O RGREGGCLI F TON CLARK CARRNASHVILLE G R ANDANN 17THOAKLA N D ITA S K A ALABAMAWASHINGTON LASAL L E GEYER LAWNH OLLY HILLS MI N E R V A R H ODESJOEL22NDNEOSHO CO T E B R I L L I A N T E 17THRO H N 13THCOLBYSEMINARYEM M A IOWAHIG H L A N D VONP HUL CLARA11THBO W E N GEYERMICHIGANSHIRLEYGR E E R REBER ANNETTASPRINGDALE SPRU C E VIRGINIAPERSHING CONCORDIACATES PENR O S E HOGANWE S T M I N S T E R WASHI N G T O NTHERESA LEMPA L VA K O E L N MONTANASANFORDFOLSOM WADE 15THH U N T E R WY O M I N G LOUISIANAHENRIETTA CHOUTEAU PRIVATE SPRINGOCTAVIAOREGONEASTLASALL E STAELY BELL MA R K E T AS H L A N D FE D E R E R SPRINGINDIANAWYOMING BI N G H A M FYLER FA S S E NBRANNONHANCOCK WA L S H LE X I N G T O N WRIGHT LA B A D I E M A R I O NME L R OSE HAMILTONGANO BERTHOLD McCAUSLANDCHAMB E R S SHENANDO A H GEY E R FYLER EU N I C E GARRISONMURDOCH 2NDGANOBENTONIVANHOELODE NE O S H O LINDENWOOD T A LM AG E NORTHRUP CLARENCESA C R A M E N T O CLAYTON IVANHOE MISSOURIDEKALB MAPLE HA R N E Y RAYMOND HICKOR Y RUTG E R KINGSBURY ORIOL E WANDA18THVERO N I C A MCCUNE TYLER CHRISTYCOLLE G E COMPTONROBINOFALL O N ALLEN RAYARDENBERTHOLD CLARASACRAMENTO BEETH O V E N RAYINDIANAFAIRMOUNT17THHOR N S B Y BELLERIVEPILOT22NDTHOLOZAN EL L A TE R R Y TAMMNEWSTEADGA R F I E L D W E S TMINSTER TAMMNELSONCRESCENTTEXASINDIANACA T E S NEWPORTCHILDRESS MINNESOTAHANCOCK ARKANSAS1STPENNSYLVANIAFLETCHER22ND14THW O O D R O W PARK BR O W N SCOTT MARWINETTEPARKCLIFTONGAST CLARENCEHORTONPARTRIDGE ST F E R D I N A N D FR E N C H W ATERMAN WES T W A Y MARKE T ITA S K A ITASK A59TH ANN GR A T I O TSUNSETPRINCETONAL D I N E MCNAIRBL O W DUNNICA MA R G A R E T T A 9THPARKGA R F I E L DTARA 37THLO T U S TY R O L E A N RI D G E AMHERST THERESACHEROKEEPINE GROVEDEWEYCA T E S BE R T H A 16THMCNAIRMA R K E T JAMIESONWYO M I N G 19THHAMILTONLUCAS C O T E B R I L L I A N T E AL D I N EOAKMA F F I T T BIDDLE W A L S HLEONAHARLANWASHINGTONMCPHERSON GLENMORE NO R W OO DACCOMAC OREGONHODIAMONTKINGWOODDELMA R EASTMACKLIND9THCLIFTONGRAN D KE N N E R L Y WISEHAMILTON HICKO R Y LAWNEWING16THPARKW O O D ABNERRAYCRESCENTMORAFA R L I N ALFREDEIL E R LACLE D E 16THELLENWOOD BIDDL E DAKOTASUBLETTE CHAMB E R SPASADENA PRESIDENTMAURYHIG H L A N D BELLER IV E HIGHLANDLUCA S WA B A D A ALABAMASA N F R A N C I S C O 10THFAIRVIEWGRAHAM YORKGL A D Y S W ILLIAMS OXFORDSPRU C E SULPHUR59TH13THLA B A D I E CANTERBURY 59THWINONA COLE R A M P I 7 0 RI D G E WISE OAKLAND ROBERTS MAPLE IOWAWALN U T G A N N E T T WESTEVANS HADLEYTHURMANA S H L A N D COLE GILESBISCHOFF BENTO NCORA 2NDBELTMITCHELL GR A N D AMHERSTWINNEBAGO MAGNOLIA 9THE M M E T CAMBRIDGE9THMARWINETTE18THWARRE N LEONARDMCKINLEY ARLINGTON ENRIGHT SARAHNEBRASKAGILESGILES23RDCLIFTOND O V E R LE X I N G T O N LEONAELIZABETH BRUNO SA N F R A N C I S C O T E S SO N JUNIATA SOUTHWES T 7THVIRGINIAPOP E WATERMAN PRATHER23RDFENDLERDRURYHARVARDALLEN STANLEY BOTANICAL OLEATHAACMECLAY T O N DEWEYENRIGHT EM M A INTERDRIVEMA R K E T UNIVERSITYTA F T JUNIATA LINDENWOOD PA L M MA F F I T T LINDELL 18THDELOR KO S S U T H CHEST N U T WI L M I N G T O N WATERMAN 14THPR I V A T EACADEMY REBER ALLE NDEERDRYDEN QUI N C YMcCAUSLAND OXF O R DHILLS FIL L M O R E SO U L A R DRAMP I64DRYDEN POP LA R THOLOZANBELT EI C H E L B E R G E R VERNON NEOSHO MA R G A R E T T AMELBA MISSOURIHIGH EUCLI D WA B A D A OS C E O L A ELIZABETHOAKDALE P A R K EL M B A N KTOWER GROVECATES 7THTHERESAPARK EN R I G H T PENNSYLVANIAHEREFORDRUTGE RIRVINGFA R L I N AS H L A N D 21STBANCROFT ST F E R D I N A N D 13THOHIOSALENASUMMITMIAMIWESTLLOYD CO T E B R I L L I A N T E PERSHING SUTHERLAND KRAFTWESTMINSTER66TH SIGEL 17THPAL M WA L S H GASCONADEMAPLEARSENALBURDBERTHOLD EWINGSEMPLE21STTHOLOZAN WABA S H RED B U D HICKO R Y PAPINCOLLEGEETON MA F F I T T POTOMAC MULLA N P H Y DALE PENNSYLVANIAAUBERTPLATEAU LINDENWOOD EUCLIDCASTLEMAN 21STTHEK L A GERALDINEPA L M YALELUCAS N I N A IVANHOEKENSINGTON DESPE RESAMHERSTDONOVANLIMITGENESTAMICHIGANMISSOURIWESTMORELA N D PALM JANUARY21STKINSEY MEL R O S E LE X I N G T O N LAMI GRANDOBEARSPRINGOS C E O L A MONTG O M E R Y FI L L M O R E VICT O R BITTNER MISSOURIMIAMIROS A L I E LACLE D E WI L M I N G T O N IOWAMINNESOTAANNCHERRYTOWER GROVE AUBERT2NDGEYER L O U I S BE L L E RUTGE R RO B E R T WILSON M A R KETHALLFAIRVIEW BLENDONROBERTS AVONDALE8THALEXANDERADKINSOAK GROVEWOODL A N D MINNIE VERNON MALL A R D KINGSLANDIOWAKE N N E R L Y MICHIGANACADEMYHOWA R D CARRJANUARYTAMMUNIVERSITYKEOKUK L O RAN HILLSSU N S H I N E OAKDALEGROVEWYOMI N G PAPINLAUREL GURNEYTH EODORE ALEXANDERBOTANICAL ALBERTAKLEMMALAMOLAURELFA R L I N OLEATHAIVANHOEDES PERESSPRING1 S T VINE WHARFTRINITYSULPHURGR E E R IDAHOCHILDREN'S IDAHOFERRY CASTLEMAN MARDEL SALERNOALASKABREME NVIVIAN HEREFORDNA G E L ORCH I D EDNAWITHNELLLOUISIANATH E O D O S I A HIG H L A N D WANDA22NDDRYDENVERNON CHAMBERLAIN ROLAN D LOUISVILLETH E O D O R E GRATI O T ENRIGHT WATERMAN A R U N DEL MARIET T A MARK E T WA B A D A 14TH39THU T A H PAPIN FE D E R E R PERSHING TH E K L A WINNEBAGOJANUARYUTAH WI N N E B A G O EM I LY 18THPARK VIRGINIACABANNE 18THHENRY RAYMEMORIALGRACELEROYTAFTOAKWOOD HICKO R YBAILEYSUMMIT DESO T O PLYMOUTH VILLA CASS MIAMIDRURY MISSOURIRAYRANDALLBECK CONNECTICU T VICTORIA MARCUSJULIAN INDIANAENRIGHT SALENAOFALLON15TH 13THATHL O N EOAKRIDGE PA L M RAYGR E E R SHENANDOAH SUTTONL I L L IAN TENNESSEENO R T H L A N D LE E THERESAWELLSTONSPRINGRUS S E L L CORN E L L DOVER ONEILLANGEL R O D T RUTGE R AS H L A N D OAKLAND CONNECTICUT CARRCABANNE CHILDRESSM A R G A R E T T A CHILDRESSLEOLAALMAALBERTACORAKINGSBURY PENRO S E MICHIGANVINE 38THWESTPINE NE O S H O EM M A GA R E S C H E KRAFTMONTANA RUSSELL CO T E B R I L L I A N T E BLENDONSCOTT 23RDTE R R Y OHIO17THSAN BONIT A WARR E N CHILDRESS6THMAGNOLIA HURSTAS H L A N D BINGH A M RUTG E R MAPLE CRIT T E N D E N VISTA EI C H E L B E R G E RITASKA SA C R A M E N T O IVANHO E FARRA R ROSEDALES U L P H UROAKRIDGEHEEGE PORTISP O R T L A N D EASTC A L V I N WELLS HUMPHREY MYRTLE R O B E R T ALEXANDERRHODES CHARITON GR E E R WISE BOTANICALKNOXCO T E B R I L L I A N T E CUSHING GA R E S C H E MAURYUNIVE R S I T Y CLARKWALTON 13THMAPL E ETZEL MISSISSIPPITEXASLANGLEY WALTONROSA9THWISCONSINCHRISTYUP T O N G O E N E RLAUREL DRESDENMANOLA MAGNOLIA NASHVILLE IR O NBELTWYOMING HA N N O V E RLINCOLNBEULAH LO T U S TENNESSEEVIRGINIAGA R E S C H E WISE OAKVI EWHODIAMONTFIL L M O R E REBER TENNESSEELE X I N G T O N MARMADUKE EUCLID11THMICHIGAN11TH21STGRATI O T 8THRUTGE R MULLA N P H Y 11TH3RD ARL ING T O N 18THHANCOCK MARQUETTE CARDINALRAYH E E G E JUNIATA HA V E N LA B A D I E MA F F I T T LEONAPURCELLJULIAN RAYMOND RAMP I55PERSH I N G 10THCOLLEGE11THADKINSP O TOM A C BRISTOL REBER 10THHADLEYTE S S O N GIMBLI N CO T T A G E BE L L E R I V E MICHIGANEDNA11THWASHINGTONCARLNEWSTEAD NEWSTEADLUCAS ITA S K A 8THGARRISONMC P H E R S O N UP T O N MCREE MA R G A R E T EIL E RWHITTIER C A R R O L L PINE REBER DUCK W O R T H FORESTWEL L S MCREE SCHILL E R HADLEYW A L S H 1STCONNECTICUTACKERT WALKWAYHICKO R Y DELO R 25THLE X I N G T O N SARAHJORDANCANTERBUR Y CORBITT LI B E R T Y FLA DYALEFL O R A CABANNE THOLOZAN BL O W BAI L E Y QU I N C Y QUE E N S VIRGINIAOREGONPOTOMAC WE S T M I N S T E RCORALU C I L L E DAVI S O N SH E R R Y BI N G H A M SU L L I V A N MICHIGANMISSOURIBIDDLE KI N G S L A N D RAYMOND CLAR K PLYMOUTH WE S T M I N S T E R FAIRMOUNTADKINSGLADES 8THBE L L E R I V E TENNESSEEOHIOPLYMOUTH SULPHUROUTER TH E O D O S I A CANTON ACCOMAC ODELL TAMM23RDR A MPI7 0 GRAP E HARLAN9THWASHINGTON CO N V E N T 9THBELL MAURYSCOTT HOLL Y FORESTCO T T A G E TENNESSEECORALE N A FIL L M O R E PARKVIEW CO T E B R I L L I A N T E C A R R O L LWELLS DAKOTA SELL S KI N G S L A N D POTOMACSALERNO MA R G A R E T T A TALMAGEWI L M I N G T O N GASCONADE J A MIESON LA L I T E THOLOZAN DEKALBPA L M BELRUEMA R K T W A I N 16THKENSINGTON ALCO T T YALETESSON THOLOZAN JANUARYJANUARYPART RI D G E LAWRENCEOXFORDLOUISIANALASALL E SUTHERLAND CREST OHIO3RDBIR C H E R GRA N D CALIFORNIAPA R K ENGELHOLMTI E M A N N LINDELLS U N S H I N EAR LINGTON PARKER CLEMENS 15THVERMONTBARTMER EL M B A N K CAR RI E VIRGINIABO W E NNORMANDYTAMM GENESTAMAGNOLIA R A M P I 7 0 ET O N 21STCORONADOLA U R A ROBERTPRATHERDARTMOUTH LEMPCLARAILLINOISHARRISHICKORY PRINTZ PENNSYLVANIAPOTOMACALFRED THEODORE RAMP KINGSHI GHWA Y B L V D GRACEMAGNOLIA P R I V A T E 1STFLORA 16THEASTMCDONALDEMILIE JAMES BOTANIC A L 15TH18THFAIRVIEW 8THLEXINGTON WALLACEIR O N VIRGINIAWANDAWALSH 8THJULIAN LYNC H BAMBERGERWALNU TGARV I NPALM FA R L I N AMHERSTCO T E B R I L L I A N T E HUMPHREY BE S S I E RUTGE R OLEATHAKINGSLANDHA R N E Y WASHINGTON SARPY W A L S H SCHOO L ODELL EDWARDSFERGUSONGIBSO N 7TH13THWINNEBAGO 11TH2ND C E C I L ARLINGTONJU L I A N TE R R Y DE MUNPAT T O N ALFREDMISSOURIKI N G S L A N D AUBE R T W E L L S BEGGRIDGEWOODBURDWABASHNEOS H O BANCROFT LENOX MA R K E T ARTHURCENTRAL HAR RI S ECOFFTHR U S H HARTFORD K O ELN C D B A N K S MAPLE 22ND13TH6THP E RRY COL UM BIA CLEMENS VIRGINIAPA R K WISE MICHIGANBRUNO ODELL B O W E N RED BUDMULLA N P H Y PRATHERWANDARAMP I70 WILLARD FAI R C H I L D L I L L I ANFLOY HICKO R YYALE TAMM22NDSALENAARTHUR MARKE TMAIN THOLOZAN GRANT OREGONOAKMOUNTEDWINHIL L OAKLAND VICT O R COLLEGEC A B A N N E STEFFENSEAST LEONAGRATIO T W EST38THNEWPORTPHILLIPS RIDGE TAMMHENRIETTA AS H L A N D EDWARDSBADEN CLEVELAND CLIFTONPRARIEHELENLUCAS KNOXVISTA 23RDCHERRYTAYLORDARDENNEOAKGLADES CO T E B R I L L I A N T E EICHELBERG E RSUNSET LEFFINGWELLEIL E R 18THELLING TO N KO S S U T H MIAMI NEWBYMONT G O M E R Y TAYLOR10THPRIVATE 19THLIL L I A N GRACERUTGE R ST L O U I S GILMORETHERESASIMPSON16THWALL TH E O D O S I A ROBERTS HADLEYR O S A LOWELLGRATI O T GRACEWESTWYOMING VI C T O R PRI V A T E CARRWESTGATEJOHN PAPINEUCLIDMA F F I T T CLIFTONLO T U S SM IL EYRAMP I552NDCALIFORNIACLARAMARYLAND FAIR PL Y M O U T H BLAINE NE O S H O THOLOZAN COLONIALS H I R L E Y WILSON FIL L M O R E FOREST PARK PA G ELUCAS N HUNTHAN LEY DELMAR CLAYTON BI R C H E R FORES T P A R K GRA V OI S NA T U R A L B R I D G E CHIPPEWA MANCHESTER O L I V E RIVERVIEWST C H A R L E S R O C K WATSON RIVERVIEWCHIPPEWA §¨¦70 §¨¦64 §¨¦44 §¨¦55BROADWAY GRANDHAMPTONSKINKER7THWEST F LOR ISSAN T CHOUT E A U TUCKERD R M A R T I N L U T H E R K I N G BIG BENDJAMIESONJEFFERSONH A L L S F E R R Y R IV E R V IE W LOUGHBOROU G H F L O R IS S A N T KINGSHIGHW A Y BROADWAYFLORISSANT KINGSHIGHWAYFLORISSANT KINGSHIGHWAYKINGSHIGHWAYKINGSHIGHWAYFLORISSANTKINGSHIGHWAYKING S HI G H W A Y JEFFERSONGRANDLO U G H B O R O U G H Central Harlem Creek Humboldt, Baden Ferry Southern Arsenal Prairie Utah Gimblin Dakota Rocky Branch, Salisbury Lemay North Louisa, Trudeau, Barton Biddle, Chambers South-Benton ¶ Projects NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE SITE SCALE CSO Regions St. Louis City St. Louis County T h e M e t r o p o l i t a n S t . L o u i s S e w e r D i s t r i c t D a t e : 11 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 5 S c a l e : N T S CSO VOLUME REDUCTIONGREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMPILOT PROGRAMGI FACILITY LOCATIONS MISSISSIP PI RI V E R !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(9THHALLOLIVEUNIONLE E ARSENAL COMPTONLINDEL L 20THB LA IR DE L M A RGOODFELLOW 4THPINE SHAW FYLER CASS SIDNEY IOWABA T E S COOK LAFAYETTE NEBRASKA10TH2NDVANDEVENTERLOCUS T LOUISIANAPERNOD ETZEL 39THDALE 3RDBE L L 18THCA R T E R MINNESOTAS W I T Z E R MCLA R A N RI D G E PRARI E MORGAN FORDOAKLAND MARDEL CLAYT O N EV A N S MA F F I T T LA B A D I E 1STCALIFORNIABELTCOLEEUCLID GUSTINEME R A M E C 11THPE N R O S E FIN N E Y AL D I N E 19thSUBLETTEGLASGOWBRANNONKIENLENST L O U I SJANET MICHIGANFLAD MINERVA WATSON HELENDELOR SHREVERUSSELL LACLE D E ITASKA BENTON OSAGE R I V E R D E S P E R E S 7THWALSH MACKLIND12THJENNINGS STATIONSPRINGMIMIKAVIRGINIAWREN CARR BENTAS H L A N D BOYLEPEST A L O Z Z I LEMPFERGUSONDEVONSHIRE ERACOLUMBIA WYOMING WEST PARK MAGNOLIA RHODESPENNSYLVANIA WA B A D A NOTTINGHAM BIRCHER KO S S U T H BRANC H ELLIOTLIL L I A N 8THROGERNEWSTEADELLENWOOD ANG ELI C A ENRIGHT HARTFORD JOHNG E R M A N I A WHITTIERBECK PARK 21STTAMMGANOROSA PLOV E R ADEL AI D E LANSDOWNE WELLS THRU S H IDAHOMY R O N REGALBARTMER SEMPLEWINONA BURDNEOSHO CHEST N U TWESTBEAC O N WISEMILENTZ MADIS O NHAMILTONFORSYTH OAK HILLTOWER GROVEWILBORNCLARALINTONDETONTY ALASKAMcCAUSLANDCHRISTYGOETHE ANNCORASOUTHW E S T SWAN SCANLAN ODELL BI N G H A MMCCAUSLAND TARABART O NWARNECHURCH BIDDLE LAMINEWBYROBI N FRANK L I N ST CHA R L E S BL O W D O V E R THOLOZANSUTTERWYDOWN CATESEAST MACKENZIEBELLEVUEEADSHODIAMONT OBEARARCO CLEMENS DESOTO25THTEXASFOLSOM HO L L Y H I L L S MCREE FINKMAN KLEMMSALISB U R Y BAYARDBR O W N MURDOCH RUS KI N EDI S O N L Y N C H GA R F I E L D AUBERTMAIN GOVE R N M E N T EME R S O N BANCROFT RAYWI L M I N G T O N GEN E VI E V E CAR RI E TA F T TH EK L A TE R R Y ELTONHAR RI S CAROL I N E PARKER SHARPCLAXT O N ALFREDHUNT ALLE N KEOKUK H O R D FERR Y IR O N OHIO19THDAGGETT DUNCA N HARNEY BRADLEY DUNNICA LLOYD JUNIATA FLETAGARRISONALIC E PAPIN P A S A D E N A BACONWISCONSINDOCK B U LW ER FIELDALCOT T SETH TAYL O R BU R G E N MIAMI CLEVELAND WHERRYHOLL YACME WALN U T UTAH WHARFPARNELLETHEL FLOYYALELINDENWOOD SUNBURYMCKINLEY B R I D G E AD A MARYL A N D CLARK MARINEBE S S I E THOMAS CHOUT E A U ROSA L IE DAVI S O N LISETTE FAIRVIEW ARLI N GT O N BO W E N AN D E R S O N TENNESSEESUTTONGLA D Y S MCK I S SOC K WASHINGTON PA L M CLIFTONPECKSPRUCE HA V E N SUTHERLAND MCKINLEY LAMBDINEASTSO U T H Q U I N C Y POTOMAC WANDAAL M A CANAAN LANGLEY MEMORIALEAST NORTH LEONOR K SULLIVAN37THKINGSLANDBEGGCALV A R Y HORNSBY STAELY POP EMAYWOOD HOFFMAN LIN C O L N FALLVERO N I C A THURMANARUNDEL MENARDWILCO XGRAHAMTRINITYROBBINS WALL SMILEY SC H I L L E R HUMPHREY GR E E R GER AL DI N E J E N W O O D DODIE R GRANDFA R L I NNELSON R O B E R T APRICOTOAKW O O D LO T U S ACADEMYMELBAELIAS MATHILDADARBY14THM O T T PERSHING ARKANSASSHERIDAN BROADWAYORIOLEILLINOISJU L I A N TYLER TH E O D O R E TH E O D O S I A LAWRENCEWARR E NCOLONIAL EIL E RPENDLETONOLEATHA ABERDEEN MC P H E R S O N GRESHAM M E LV INULENAMARCONIGASCONAD EEDGEWOOD MARQUETTE KENWOOD ALAMO BREME NPAMPLIN BILLUPSCO T T A G ETEMPLE HOOVER GEYE R ARENDESDEL NORTESNOWST R A T F O R D PR ANG E MARMADUK E VASELVISTA CLAYJUNE TURNERLE D U C70TH GILESFABER VESTRAVI N IA LAWLEREI C H E L B E R G E R 6THGROVEOUID A VERMONTDERBY NASHVILLE SHENANDOAH ADKINSBERTHOLD ALABAMAEDWARDSAUG U S T A ALBIALORAN GILM O R E DOLMANTHROOP OXFORDCLARENCESA L O M A PLYMOUTH WEIL NORWOODGENESTARAYMOND AUDRAIN ORAN ATHL O N E GAYOLA B E R N A R D EM M A BADE N BISSEL L ZEPHYR GARNER ARTHUR ACORNFLETCHERSAMUE L S H E P A R D DELMONTRED B U D PLAINVIEW LOUIS JA M I E S O NLOUISVILLE CLARENDONWATERMAN DELORE NORTHR U PRAVENWOOD COLEMANDALTONM A R I O NASTRANORFOLK DAYTON ALBERTA LA U R A MAPLE NO R T H L A N D GAMBLEWILLIAMSL E X A BEAUMONTPARTRIDGEMAY E M I L Y C D B A N K S FAIRWI N D S O R GLADES WILL M OR ELILLYCLINTO N CONNECTICU T S E I B E R T DAHLIA SELLS COLORADOKEMPSTEPHEN JONESMORASU N S H I N E MAIDE N O L D E N B U R G BLACKSTONEMARCUSWATTSPIERCEHICK O R Y NAGELBERGER HALLADAYFAULKNER DEWEYHOYTMORTONPRAGUEWADE C I R C L E VI E WEADS BRIDGE M A R K E T MAURYDEBALIVIERE LONGFELLOW ELLIOTTPATTISON PRATHERMISSISSIPPIR O M A I N E SHAWMUTEDNAGARYLE X I N G T O N RANKENHARLAN KENSINGTON HANCOCK GIBSO N PLEASANT38THBAMBERGERPEYTONLEO N ACO Z E N S WEBSTERABNERMA R G E MANOLAPORTISELM BE U L A HHERN BISHOP P L SCOTTH E I D E L B E R G 67THBEAC H W O O D 69THEL M B A N K LAKEGIMBLI N SCOTT68TH HOWA R D CHILDRESS RO L A N DWACO EL W A R D VERNON ANGEL R O D T D E G I V E R V I L L E DRURYHIG H L A N D DESTR E H A N SH U L T E FE D E R E R G L E N E C H O LOWELLLELANDTHEATER KINGSBURY LU C I L L E DE MUNLEADAL E FR E N C H BRUNO FL O R I A N HAWTHORNE SPENCER S A N DIE G O GEIGER BONITAHILLS W E S T NORTH RO O S E V E L T TEAL COUNTRYCL U B EUGENEGRAPECASTLEMAN WESTSOU T H GRATI O TGAST MCNAIRWESTMINSTE R KEMPER SALENAH E E G E HYAMSBELLERIVEFORESTDRESDENC E C IL KING S DR MARTIN LUTH E R K I N G ROSEDALE H I L D A RUTGE R RICHMOND LINK HOLTOFALL O N MELROSE MANHATTA N MONTG O M E R Y ROBERTS DA W S O N AVONDALE59THBLAS E MCDONALD HENRIETTA MAXWELL NO R T H P O I N T E RUPERT P R IMM PILOT16THSPROULEEL L A ELSARAUSCHENBACHBUCHA N A N LYNDOVER LIVINGSTONSUM M IT WAGN E R LE W I SSALOME NEWPORTMAYLORCHATH A M MCCUNE 22NDUNIVE R S I T Y 66THIDL E W I L D HOBAR T COLLINSHE R B E R T MONTCLAIRL A K E W O O D EMERLING PI C A D I L L Y DUR A N T FLORA VINE F O X C ROFT MO U N T EWINGGL E N M O R E INDIANAHEREFORDCARDINALH A M B U R G TERRI LYNN ST F E R D I N A N D WALLA C E CU P P L E SVALLE GANN E T T TULANE ESTHERREBERNIXON C O N D E LAFLINLEBAN O N OSCE O L AHATZ GR E E N L E A COLOGNEDILLONST VINCENTSALZMAN ELGINVILLA VICTORIA EDMUNDARLMONTRIDGEDALER O S W E L L CABANNE CARLSBADDELAVANPHILBROOKSAVIO LE N A E L W O O D F E R RIS DEKALBLOUG H BOROUGHLUCASSHEPLEY AVI S HA M M E T T ANNA H A N N O V E R WALDO LOOP AGNESERICK T E HUNTLEYQUE E N S RAMP I 7 0 M A NETTEPHILOSA P P H I R E HORTON GRAMOND WE L L S M A R SYLVANTORII KRAFTGAY O V E RBRO O K RO S L Y N VAILCA L V I N 13THNAVAJOESARAHANDOVER FL O R E N C E SHIRL E Y ANNIE MALONEPORTLAND C H A N D L E R CHAMBERLAIN GREGGGE R T R U D E GOEN E RALAMEDA 15THST ANGEROSELANDMCMILLAN PER R Y ROXIED O R C A S GUST A V LODE CERR E MARILL A C GR E E N W A Y COLERIDGE MAURICEJAMES AMANDA MARY TEDMARPARISIRA DOD D RI D G EHOLBORN S T E LMO VERA GA R E S C H E KEITH IRVINGTALMAPINE GROVEMONTROSELEOLAGREGANHILLSDA L E CLEVEDONBROCKSTOLL E HIGH MILLS MA R G A R E T T A L EAHY GREENWOOD HE B E R T A L L EM AN I AURSULA THAT C H E R WALDEMAR PARKVI E W SOUTHLANDSUBURBAN DAIBE R HIVIE W LAL I T E SOUTHERN C O M M O N W E A L T HEMILIETO E N G E S TY R O L E A NROWAN GRATTANMALLIN C K R O D T HUM B O L D T GOFF SARPYSALERNOHARVARDBELRUE JOSEPHINE BAKERASHBY ORC H I D MARSHALLOREON CINTRAWHITNEY BE L L ELULUA V I E LEROYMULLANPHY LO M B A R D KOS CI USK O NORTH CORONADOEV A R T S MATH E W OGDENROTHGR O V E L A N D NEWH O U S E LE S C H E N MARWINETTEWES C OTT COCH R A N ACCOMACKNOXWILSON JOELETONSU L L I V A N STIVER S C A R R LANECORNELL STAN W O O D HOOKE CHAMB E R S EU N I C E MACKAYL OC K E FAM O U SST ANNSELLENDALEROLLAPHILLIPSDEVLIN WITHNELLSHANNONRO H N CUTTERMCKEAN JANE NORTHCRESTST E I N S Z E A L A N D SIGELANNETTABITT N E R FLORIDA CHRI S TI A N DEER PATH OCTAVIABLAINE K O E L NBERMUDAAMHERST C O N C O R D I A HOGANOAKRIDGEVE T T E R GAYLORDFAUQUIER BA R R E T T KE N N E R L Y KI N A M O R E DARDENNEARMAND A K I N S KO R T E RANKINHALEYCOLBYU P T O NHEMAN RAMPI44BELDONOT T O ALE X A N D E R LUCYMI N N I E HATHERLYLA M O NTSTODDARD DUGAN WITH E R S CORBITT SH E R M A N TI E M A N NHIGHF IELD RI D G E V IE W SHA RONLONGRIDGEC A R O N D E L E T TALC O T T MONI T E A U FO R E S T H I L L WINCHESTER ACACI A ALPHAG R A C E KENTUCKYPE G G Y OAKDALEVARRELMANNWINNEBAGO JOSEPH HOWELL RUTHSANFORDJAMES COOL PAPA BELLMCART H U R CHERRYOXEYE LA VETA O AK PARKWOODNASSAU BELWOOD POP L A ROAKVIEWHAYWOODGARVIN P A I SLEYSTANFORD DRYDENCOLLEGE DEERWOOD ART HILLDARTMO O R MARNICEDRESSELLJULESHIAWATHA N I N A NO R M A N D YWELEBA RA N D A L L MORI N OAKKNOLLSA N F R A N C I S C O A R D S L E Y WI L L O W W O O D RAMP I 5 5 BAYV O N P H U L WO O D L A N D L I LBURNNORWAY SEN A T E DOLAN HA R P E R HALFS O U L A R DMABELPADDINGTON HILDESHEIMCI RCLEPE LHAM CE D A R CATALI N A BRITTINAM E L I A JANUARYG R I M S H AW L I N D B E R GHPON C E CO N T O U R HAZENP E B B LE HILL A R C H WOODHAZELWABA SH GARTH KINSEY BAL F O U R COLT O N SH E R R Y W OODROW GREENH AVEN VERLOLDE ENGLISHRAFTDARTMOUTH LANHAM J E F F E RSONCL A R E M O R E CAMELLIAPRIVATEJE S S E J A C K S O N SUNSET SA C R A M E N T O IVANHOEOVERLEAHE N D E R S O N CREST HILLERLEN O X GREENDALE GRAVOISDONALDPR E SCO T T FARRA G U T SE LBE R BENMORESEATTLEBLENDONBUCKNERFRE DE RI CK COLFAXMELVILLESCHOLLMEYE RPURCELL ARDENFAI R F A XROSEBUD ECOFFLONKARFA S S E N FA R L E Y THRESADARTFORDSOUTHWOOD MOUNT PLE A S A N T A LGERNON MOELLENHOFFESTERBROOK BELAIRERUDDY BENNETTNORDICAVALON MONTANAARBOR 23RDDA M A T O MAYBERRYSTEFFENS A U S TR I A ELLINGTON FRANCISWESTGATEMENOLABE E T H O V E N AL B R I G H T JENNY KA Y HADLEYCAPEHARTMY R T L E COUNCIL GROVEWESTMORELA N D PEARLWEL D O N P R E S I D E N TGRANVILLE CRANEHIL D R E DOSBORNSCOVILL PAT T O N VIV IA NM ITC HE LL NORWALK COLLETTA GILSONHULLMARKTWAINCARLLAMMERT YORKWA R W I C K HILLS L A N D PROSPECTWYNHILL CARSON HE N N E R YATESFAIR C H I L D AGAT E R M MOORENORTHWOOD KATHLEENPLATEAU WELLSTONRAVENHILLMILTONST RITALIMITLUDWIGLAWNRAMSEYM A R IL A C HORNER RAC QU E T EVERGREENTILLIE HUN T I NGTON T E S S O N PRI N C E T ON BELLE GLADESULPHURHARMONYSADLERLOGAN KENEWAH WILLARD MAU R E R VASSARLE O N O R APARCHESTER BOTANICAL LASALL EIONACO T E B R I L L I A N T E BROOKL Y N SCHOFIELD WARNER WINCHELSEADUKE HELMONEILLLA BELLEBRENTMOOR C A R R O L L VICTORBOLES SLATTERYH U M M E L S H E I M DARVERFARRA R ARCADIA ROCKDALESTRODTMAND A R D A N E L L A GRA N A DA DELTA S I M PS ON C H E RO K E ERYAN LIERMANN KLOCKE CANTON DEMPSEY SP R I N G D A L E M A R I E T T A FOUNTAI N HEN R Y BONETAFIL L M O R E B RISTOL C R E S TONANITA DEERBE L L E D R I V E PRESE R V A T I O N SU N D O W N RUSHBURRWOOD RO C K B R O O K OUTERPIN E R I D G E 17THEDWINNONIE SOUTHVINE GROVEMONRO E WENZLICKFARRELLBE R N H A R D T ALBION S A LZBURGERRICHERTHAYSFOREST VIEW WICHIT A BISHOPS WEST P I N E FAIRMOUNTWOLZ DICK GREGORYHI L L CAMBRIDGE KI NGWOODSCHOO L JU L I A MALLARD DAKOTACRESTLAND CON G R E S SRANCHDALELO R R A I N E SEMINARY CREI GHTONFR I E D A S T I L LW E L L TROOSTVASSIERPA U L I A NWOODRUFF KLEINCURRYST P A U L HOSP I T A L CRESCENT VIL L E LOHMEYER MARLI NGAINE F L O R I S S HYDRAULICMOLLER HOR T E N S ELEVERETTESTATLER BAGL E Y B E ACHGLADSTONEPONTIACHOLYOKE LIBERTYVOLO LACEYCHILD R E N ' S MAYF I E L D GRAYMCGEEMISSOURIMILFORDUPSHAWBARROLEN E LOWENWI N D H A M BRANTNERMAYFAIRN AC O MIS CUSHIN GTHORNBYWE S T B E L L EST MARYSFAIRHAVE N SA N BONITA WILLETTO AKLEYP A R K R I D G E SA N T A M O N I C A N O R S T E A D BE R T H A OREGONENGELHOLMROSEWOODT R E M O N T BARBARACRITTENDEN MARY E L L E N VIENNAJACOBSOLDCOALWINDERMERE KENNETT DEMENILISA B E L L A JACKSON ROSSITERBAI L E Y RAVENSCROFT BLAKEMOREWALKERWHALEYCAM P B ELL VILLANOVA TROY RANCHWOOD NEW ASHLANDLAURELWALTONMURPHYKIRK L A N D CHAPL IN GERRITTELIZABETH AU D R E Y BROOKINGS WEDGEWOODGRIEFIELDJASPER PARKROSEBUR Y BRENNAN RICH A R D BERK A Y PULASKI EVELINE QUEENREDD FOXXT E R R A C E RE D E R WRIG H T THERESATRAINORCAMDEN S C H I R M E R DURYEAWESTW A YDA M ON MOR AI N EATWATER HUNTERSIEMERSCARDW ELLS U S O N FENDLERELMERCRICKETLEAKENNETHC O R Y FROWW A K O N D A HERMITAGEO'FALL O N GR A N D E L S Q U A R E BRETT H U L L RADOMARONIAFERNWELMERING THEOBALD SKYVIEW GUI LFORDFE R D I N A N D JONESJUDYBISCHOFF JORDANFREMONT RIVE R W O O D WILLIAMKUHSFORDEY KRUMKNAPPB E L L E RI V EACRES HILGARD LAT T AMACLARE LAVENDERGRUNERHIGGINSCRANSTONHARB O R ALVA P O E P I N G MAGAZINE LABEAUM E P O I N T V I E W EITMAN CHARITON HUMME L S H I E L D S GREE N H O L L YHUGHESMA R C E L I N EBAINBRIDGEOAKMOUNT TILDENACKERTWALKWAYSAN JACINTODICKSON WINWARD EL MORO HURSTINTERDRIVEC R O S S MONTGARDENHILLMONTAGUEALHAMBRARAMPSPRUCESTMU R R A Y GATESWORTHTALMAG E SWE RI N G E N N OR MA N D ALE R A M P K IN G S H IGHWAY BLVDL E E D A L E A U B U R NSTANLEY S T ANDRE W S NOONANGIE S E K I N G APPLE V ALLEYHARLEQUINKAHNSBA RKENCEDARWOODWAGELEYCOT T O N W O O D LAKE P A R K GRANTTENNISSYRACUSEAMMANN NE W C O M B STEINLAGESINGL E T O NCANTERBURYSILVERTONMU R V A L E HOPEP IT Z M A N RULE WYNWOODSELBYSAVOY STADIUMPLAZABL U E S P R U C E B A L S O N FARAWAY LESP E R A N C EBYRONRAMPLAFAYETTEAVEDONO V A NARCOLAEV A N S T O N GURNEYL A C O R N NORINE KEBE R BERR A NA Y L O RLAUDERDALE GRAND F OREST VIRGILS T J A ME S ES S E X D ONCASTER BEVERLYHOMELA N D KOSCUISKOGATELANDSTEPHENTRAFFORDS O UTHMOOR HILLVIE W AL B E R I C I S I G N A L H ILL WY M A BARTMER INDUST R I A LKATHERINE PRESTONAL C L A R ELARCH PRINTZNEONAPOINC I A N A DIANTHUSLU C E R N E HAZELWOOD ATHERSTONE SCH R O E D E R DIANTHANGARNIERLACKLANDS T ANSBURY S O P E R IDA D A L E CHARLESS COMMERCIALDUNLEER EAGLEV A L LE Y DOU GL A S S SPARTA DES PERESSTEWARTLOWERYCENTER REINEKEGRANDBERRY OLYMPIANJAMES A HARVEYCENTRALARDE E HEGERPARCRIDGEPARKDALEBRETONEMM E T BENEDIC T MARTHACRO S S OAK GROVESCHAEFFERK E NNE D Y CU BAHIGHLAND PAR K R A M P G R A V O IS R D AURO R A MCGI R K SIDE S WA L T E R WHITTEMOR EBISHOPJAJOHN S ON PRO V E N C H E R ESEXAUERWILLOWTREE C O O LV A L L E Y PO W E R S RA INORWEST BILLONNEIERSTRATHMORET U S C AN YMISSION VALLEYMOUN D BARAT HALL BLANDFO R D ARCHIVESCOR N E LI A J U D ITHBALDWINMAZEJESSICARAMP I6 4 NAD INE GARDE N DRMARTINLUTHERKI NGBRI DGEHERDE RMARGARETENGL E W O O D COMMODOREBOARDMANRID G E H AVEN EUGE N I A REI C H M A N PARKLANDFINE ARTSWO O D D A L E CATALPAMORRI S O NLISMORENORTHMOORBUCKINGHAM CENTERCROSSM O L L JEANENECURTIS ARCHWAY MANORBELRIDGEMOTARDCHEVROLETLEONARDGREENP O R T FLI N T WALBRIDGEMORGAN HUDLERCA H O K I A LY N F I E L D DU C K W O R T H REV PRUITTBRAMLAGECENTRAL CROSSPIC K E R ELTORA CHURCH BELLBOWMANAL B E R T I N E RAMP N 11TH ST PEABODYREDFIELD HAMPS HI R E MELWOODGRANDVIEWCAVERIDGEWOODVOERSTERELENOREMYRLETTEEASTGATEFAIR RIDGELY N H AVEN HI POINTETUXEDO GARDE N VI L L E HEMPSTEA D WA L L I N G F O R D WAVERLYM I D O R I FRANKEFORESTRIDGE K E N R I C K CASTLE PARK ST E D W A R D JO H A N N A LA JARA MINO MA WICKLOWWES T E R H O F F ME D E R E R PUTNAMST BERNARDDELAWARECASTL E GR E Y L I N G LAVERNELL ADELINE RIVER BLUFFTOLMANNORMA LEFFINGWELLJOSEPHINEL INDEN LA SALL E P A R K F R A N K F O R T BARTLELO U I S A PO M O N AWOODSTOCK MAEZEP O E P P I N G PROVIDENCE CO N V E N T MCCULLAGHMOBILEWEST E N T E R A N C EHOUSTONNORMANDYTRACEPL E A S E W A Y VANDERBURGHFON T B O N N E NORTH HILLOA K C R E S T DISCH INGER CLIFTONLE X I N G T O N MCPHER SON LA L I T E MA F F I T T BARTMER MAGNOLIA W A L S H OAKDALEFAI R C H I L D WELLS OAKEICHELBERG E R DEWEYLAWRENCESOUTHWES T 10THANN ST L O U I S QUE E N S BLENDONK O ELN MICHIGANBELLCOLLEGE WANDALODE VINE GRACEMARYLAND TESSON CARROLL ECOFFPRINCETONBELTHIGHLANDJU L I A N EM M A 21STWESTMINSTER REBER 23RDCAMBRIDGE21STOAKLA N D IOWADAKOTAAMHERSTWASHINGTON REBER WINONA TAYLORJUNIATAEAST 23RDGRATI O T R O S A EIL E R WATERMAN 18THSUMMITROBERTSME L R OSE MAGAZINE FE D E R E R GRATI O T EIL E R 21ST13THROBERTS KI N G S L A N D LASALL E WY O M I N G CLAY T O N DEKALB PA L M JOELHOGAN10THHANCOCK JUNIATA 16THWA L S H MINNIE JORDANGILMOREARLMONTJULIAN HODIAMONTMCNAIRPENDLETONOAK GROVESPRINGDALE GRA N D WALTONIR O N 6THHYDRAULICN I N A MACKLINDSALERNO17THTENNESSEEENGELHOLMWA L S H 16TH19TH37THWISE VERMONTWRIGHT NEWPORTDALE IOWAJAMIESONMA F F I T T JOHN LAURELBELTCLI F TON RO B E R T ORCH I D NELSONELIZABETH GA R E S C H E 18THMI N E R V A WA B A D A R A M P I 7 0 NEOSHO SALENAB O W E N BERTHOLD 22NDTALMAGEKE N N E R L Y WEL L S BE L L E R I V E CO T E B R I L L I A N T E VERNONHAMILTON VICT O R HIG H L A N D 13THOBEARKEN E W A H TAMMMAGNOLIAWOODLAND SHIRLEYOREGONWISE 7THPRESIDENT MARKE T MENARDSARAHDE MUNNASHVILLE JANUARYW A L S H SM IL EYHAMILTON13THMAURYSNOW TAMMT A LM AG E LOUISIANASIMPSONCALIFORNIATA F T MONRO E SUNSETPINE HEREFORDSOUTH 18TH16THMARWINETTELEONAIVANHOETHERESARAY7THODELL DELMA RBELT GIBSO N FENDLERARL ING T O N HIG H L A N D SULPHURHEEGE SPRINGBURDMICHIGANEDNAGRACEINDIANAYALELINCOLNEA STG ATEDRYDEN DESTR E H A N AR LINGTON HYDRAULICLASALL E BRANNONROBINLEONARD22NDCHERRYWARNEEUCLI D HADLEYBANCROFTTRINITY MA R G A R E T BELLER IV E RAMP I70RAYOREGONLI B E R T YROWANITASK A KLEMM13THW E S TMINSTER MA R K E T GR E E R 7THKO S S U T H LINDENCLARENCE SPRU C E CHAMB E R S MAGNOLIA FI L L M O R E HOLL Y SEMPLELEFFINGWELLCA R R O L L REBER IVANHOEGEYER GIMBLI N LOWELLVIRGINIAMISSOURIMONTANAGRAHAM D O V E RGREGG SALENASTEFFENSKINGSLANDWARRE N 2NDAMHERSTCLARASCHILL E R ROSAILLINOISFE D E R E R WISE MITCHELL EL M B A N K KENSINGTON CARDINALTE R R Y IR O N DRURYFL O R A COLLE G E 1STUP T O N 15THNEWHO U S E BISHOPS PERSHING HA R N E Y EV A N S SPRINGFOLSOM FA R L I N THOLOZAN WITHNELL WYO M I N G VI C T O RINTERDRIVEC A R R O L LEAST R H ODESCRESCENTNEOSHOSEMINARY LAKETAMMMADIS O N OREGONTY R O L E A N WILSON FLORA PENNSYLVANIAMAIN PARKVI E W MISSOURIHAR RI S WANDAYALEEMILIESARAHMALLIN C K R O D T PERSH I N G NEBRASKAIVANHOERED BUDMAGAZINE FA R L I N PR I V A T EGARRISON ARMANDROS A L I E WA B A D A 22ND14THLO T U S VINE COLE DE L O R JULIAN HENRIETTA ANN SA N F R A N C I S C O LAWNOXFORDEM I LY WARNES U N S H I N E WINONA CABANNE R A M P I4 4 KNAPP2ND PERSHING RI D G E RO H N HO R D GA R F I E L D VON PHU L AS H L A N D WASHI N G T O NHARRIS22ND MAURYALCO T T SA C R A M E N T O WE S T M I N S T E R DARTMOUTHCOLBY GASCONADE BO W E NOAKRIDGEW ATERMAN LEOLAGRATI O T MCNAIRWARW I C K PALM GR E E R SIGEL LO T U S QUI N C Y PARKWOODALEXANDERINDIANA18THVICTORIA MCPHERSON SULLIV A N A R U N DEL P O TOM A CMAURY 22ND19THOXFORDANN HA N N O V E R WANDAEWINGH OLLY HILLS D O V E R GREER 37THMA R K E TFLOYLO T U S VISTA ALLE N OLEATHA KLEIN MINNESOTAWI L M I N G T O N CLINTO NNORWOODACME 8THSCOTT GLADES AUBERTNEWSTEADBERTHOLD LEMPMAPLE ET O N RAYBE L L E BE L L E R I V E MISSOURIGL A D Y S SH E R R Y OAKVI EWCLARASUNSETHA R N E Y FLETCHERFAIRMOUNTCO T E B R I L L I A N T E WISE MA R K T W A I N AMHERST MALL A R D ABNERAS H L A N D NORTHRUP KI N G S L A N D PARK GR E E R FAIR U T A H MAPL E WO O D L A N D EN R I G H T MONRO E BRUNO 39THMA R G A R E T T A POTOMAC MA R K E T MARKE T OHIOVIRGINIAITA S K A PRANGE VIRGINIAGENESTAWHITTIERMARQUETTE ALBERTA BISCHOFF MULLA N P H Y ALEXANDER16TH59TH9THFYLER SPRINGK O E L N FAIRVIEWDRESDEN FLA D E M M E T SA N F R A N C I S C O BIDDL E MARWINETTETERRA C E WILLARD WESTLEONARDHORTON TEXAS13THPENNSYLVANIAMICHIGANMIAMI OHIOH E E G E OAKLAND 22NDKINGSBURY PARNELLNE O S H O WESTMINSTER GRANDMONT G O M E R Y ETON RANDALLT E S SO N RAMP I552NDTHOLOZAN TH E O D O R E 9THWALL RADOMANNETTAWESTSAN BONITA CA T E S SU N S H I N E BOTANICAL MA F F I T T BE S S I E YALEKINGSBURY ENRIGHT IVANHOERUS S E L L CUSHING AS H L A N D MAPLEPURCELL RAYALEXANDERHUMPHREY RUTGE R BL O WCLIFTON TH EODOR E PERSHING LE N A CALIFORNIAEI C H E L B E R G E R MYRTLE WALLACEDRYDEN PENR O S E 59THWI L M I N G T O NHAWTHORNE LEONAMAY OAKLAND W ESTCANTON PARKW O O D FRAN CIS ANGEL R O D T EWINGMA R G A R E T T A ACADEMYTHOLOZAN CLIFTONPENNSYLVANIASARPY OS C E O L A LA U R A COLONIAL11THLEXINGTON RAYHARRISCLARAH U N T E R KINGSBURY NEWSTEADFA S S E N PLYMOUTH P A R K UTAH CARR PRINCETON VIRGINIARAMP I70 ST F E R D I N A N D THOLOZAN TE S S O N CLARACATES CHILDRESSMC P H E R S O N THR U S H MA R K E T ITA S K A 2 1 S T WINDSORUNIVE R S I T Y GA R E S C H E C A L V I N GAST 14THL O U I S EDWARDSCOLLINS17THCORAR A MPI7 0PARK KINSEY EASTCORN E L L BLAINE RAYMOND CHILDRESSRAYMOND WI L M I N G T O N 18THFA R L I N KINGSBURY BR O W N HICKOR YACADEMYCOLLEGE SULLIV A N R U SSELLMcCAUSLAND P R E S CO T T GEY E RWELLSTON JANUARYGIMBLI N GR E E RHILLS ARLINGTON FIL L M O R E 15THMICHIGANWINONA M A R KET NA G E L PAPIN BANCROFT LEFFINGWELLCHEST N U TTARA RUTGE R ARSENAL DESPE RESWALNU T DONOVANMELB A SALERNOGRACEMCCUNE LE X I N G T O N MAGNOLIA POTOMAC MISSOURI2NDUNI V E R S I T Y JANUARYGARRISONPA L M WASHINGTON FYLERPORTIS PALM FLORAPARTRIDGEUNIVERSITY MONTG O M E R Y 9THGRA NA DA OCTAVIAGENESTAWESTPINE AS H L A N D JANUARYARTHUR CHILDREN'S HOW E L L FOUNTAIN CARRCASS REBER ARLINGTONMAGNOLIA GILMORECATES HAMILTONMA F F I T T P O R T L A N D DEWEYSPRINGMANOLAIOWA59THEL L A RUSSELL 15THRAMP I64JUNIATA WRIGH T BO W E N DAKOTA PA L M MEL R O S E KE N N E R L Y PLATEAU 9THHOWARDCORA VISTA CLAR K CLIFTON66THMAPLE PRATHEREI C H E L B E R G E RLINDELLWINNEBAGO 18THRUTGE R ROBERTS PERSHING GURNEYWISCONSINCORBITT ALFREDALBERTA OAKLAND CORONADOWALTONELLENWOOD LENOX DES PERESPAPIN LAMIEWINGNORMANDY GRACESULPHURODELL OXF O R D CASTLEMAN UP T O NLEROY CO T T A G E 1STCARLST F E R D I N A N D LACLE D E CLARENCEGR E E R L I L L IAN 21STOAKWOODUNIVERSITY CLARK VERNON TE R R Y MARYL A N D GRATIO T MIAMIWATERMAN 21STFIL L M O R E WADE LACLE D E SPRINGIRVINGPA L M L O RAN PILOTHILLSPE N R O S E LA B A D I E ITA S K ACLIFTONCHERRY PRIVATESANFORDHELENW E L L S BENTO N PENR O S E AL D I N E DODIE R FIL L M O R E GR A N D PASADENAGARRISONNE O S H O CARR ENRIGHT GRANT PAPIN HICKO R Y SUTHERLAND EAST NEWPORTDESO T O PLYMOUTH BLENDONDO D I E R 38THHIG H L A N D MISSOURIREBER SA N F R A N C I S C O ODELL SPRINGCABANNE HAMILTONILLINOISHEREFORDLLOYD McCAUSLANDC A B A N N E TENNESSEEMCKINLEY ARKANSAS2NDKE N N E R L Y THERESAARDENACCOMAC COMPTONGANOSHENANDO A H FERRY TENNESSEEPART RI D G E BUCHA N A N WES T W A Y LAWNTAFT HILDRED BELL EU N I C E BURDADKINS7THDRURYRUTG E RALBIA CONNECTICUT THEK L A LUCA S SH E R R Y VERNON EMILIE MURDOCH PARKVIEW MAPLE HOR N S B Y 9THLU C I L L E PENRO S E CHRISTY10THBAMBERGERHIL L HANCOCK BADEN CLAYTON 13THVIRGINIAREBER 23RDTAYLORCO T E B R I L L I A N T E SCOTT YALEELLING TO N THEODORE EDWINBE R T H A COLONIALAS H L A N D 6THWASHINGTON THERESAHURST21STSU L L I V A N OFALLON NO R T H L A N D CORAGILESEV A N S G O E N E R MA F F I T T CREST 11THOREGONRUTGE R BOTANICAL DARDENNEAL D I N E P E RRYEAST COLE RUTG E R GR E E R OHIOGILESR O B E R T GA R F I E L D LEONACHARITON PENNSYLVANIAMARQUETTE LASAL L E HARTFORD CO T E B R I L L I A N T E SAN BONIT AGARV I NMA R G A R E T T A PRATHERSUBLETTESA N F R A N C I S C O S H I R L E Y LE E ETZEL LE X I N G T O N HARLANMEMORIALELIZABETH GRAN D CHILDRESSJULIAN MARDEL LAURELRUTG E R COL UM BIA OAKRIDGECO T E B R I L L I A N T E LEONAHA R N E Y EUCLIDTE R R Y THURMANLO T U S PARKEUCLIDFAIRMOUNTM A R G A R E T T A MULLA N P H YCOLLEGEPRIVATEDEERCABANNE TENNESSEERUSSELLEUCLIDCLAY EVANS 1 S T HICKO R Y WE S T M I N S T E RHODIAMONT CASTLEMAN G A N N E T T MEL R O S E BENTONACCOMACGROVE KO S S U T H WINNEBAGOTAMM KINGWOOD38THBREME N REBER OLEATHA SPRINGFORESTWYOMING 7THMARCUSSUTHERLAND RED B U D MISSISSIPPIMCDONALD W O O D R O W TAMMRHODES HEBER T ENRIGHT PA R K SO U L A R D ORIOL E SA C R A M E N T O 11TH11THALABAMAMADISONHALL VILLA PASADENAVIVIANSULPHURSTANLEY TOWER GROVE HOWA R D THERESAGEYER CHURCH VICTOR HICKO R Y MICHIGANMICHIGAN11THWASHINGTON YATESEVANS CO T T A G E EN R I G H T CONNECTICU T 8THPAPINBAYARD GASCONADE ALEXANDERMCREE JANUARY9THMAPLEVICT O RWHITTIERDUCK W O R T H ROSEDALEOHIOMCREE GR E E R TI E M A N N MONTANA WESTMORELA N D WYOMING LINDELL ACKERT WALKWAYONEILLHICKO R Y ODELL 25THHARLANITASKA A L VA CANTERBUR Y MISSOURIKNOXDELMA R INDIANALUCAS THOLOZAN BL O WLAURELPOTOMACKRAFT VIRGINIAPOTOMAC SALENABAI L E Y FAIRVIEW PRIVATE MAGNOLIA BI N G H A M PARK 13THMISSOURIGLENMORE BEGGARTHUR CHOUTEAU ATHL O N E SALENACAM B R I D G E ALABAMAMORA8THC E C I L WASHINGTON WA B A D A RAYMOND BOTANICAL 17THNEWSTEADHENRY SULLIV A N CLEMENS WESTGATEMICHIGANGR A T I O T HANCOCK 2NDPA L M CO N V E N T FILLM O REGILES EDNACHILDRESS 18THRUTGE R GEYER MA F F I T T CORALUCAS FIL L M O R E CO T E B R I L L I A N T E FARRA RWELLS LYNC H 17THMARCUSWYOMING ENRIGHT CO T T A G E TO E N G E S RAMP KINGSHI GHWA Y B L V D CAR RI E SA L O M A ALAMO HARVARDTHOLOZAN LUCAS PA L MOGDENHE N N E R LOUISIANA38THMIAMI LINDENWOOD S U L P H URTHOLOZAN ALMAWABASHWABA S H HAMILTONGLADES EIL E R PL Y M O U T H LOUISIANACO T E B R I L L I A N T E 19THOFALL O N BIR C H E R FA R L I N PA R K CRIT T E N D E NOAKDALEAS H L A N D HICKO R Y BO W E N A S H L A N D GA R E S C H E G R ANDADKINS10THSCOTT TH E K L A TH E O D O S I A VIRGINIARAMP I55EM M A FAIRVIEW 13THPHILLIPS 21STWILSON NO R T H L A N D ACADEMYLE X I N G T O N DEKALBPRI V A T E DELO R ALASKATYLER PARKER MARK E T PRINTZ PENNSYLVANIAWANDAKEOKUK WARR E N RAMPKINGSH IG H W A Y B L V D 10THGERALDINE TAMMINDIANANEWPORTEADS 16THBELRUEHIGH LASALL E LA B A D I E BIDDLEARLINGTON 8THKENSINGTON OS C E O L A OHIOGEIGER LANGLEY WALSH 8THTH E O D O S I A AUBE R T WHARFCOLLEGEROBERT C O T E B R I L L I A N T E FAIRVIEW 3RDIOWAPOP E JUNIATA PAL M MULLA N P H Y QU I N C Y W A L S H BI N G H A MROLAND CLARENCEFERGUSONLEONAEDWARDSALFRED15THOAKHUMPHREY R A M P I 7 0 11THFR E N C H RUTGE R HADLEYTENNESSEETH E O D O S I A ALFREDYORKALLEN MISSOURICONNECTICUT STAELY CHAMBERLAIN IDAHOVERO N I C A RIDGEWOODNEOS H O P R I V A T E NE O S H O RAYMELVILLEPRATHERWATERMAN P A R K D A L E ALLEN 23RDIDAHOCONCORDIASELL S W ILLIAMS UNIVERSITYSHENANDOAHPINE GROVEWYOMING VIRGINIAPA R K WISE KI N G S L A N D GRAP E BINGH A MSUTTON C D B A N K S WATERMAN KNOXLE X I N G T O N KINGSLANDBOTANIC A L LIMITLIL L I A N 9THHICKORYPENNSYLVANIACLARK 1ST17THBELLERIVELOUISVILLELONGFELLOWRAYCA T E S CANTERBURYOAKMOUNT RICHERTSCHOO L NASHVILLE MIAMI LUCAS HADLEYCLEMENS BEULAHWE S T M I N S T E R 18TH22NDBITTNER RIDGE BIDDLE GANO 16THLEMPFORESTJ A MIESON AUBERTUTAH SPRU C EPRARIE DELOR LE X I N G T O N KRAFT3RD CHAMB E R S 6THBEETH O V E N POP LA R RI D G E DRYDENMAIDE N IVANHOE LEFFINGWELLMC P H E R S O N 18THHADLEYTEXASL I L L I AN WALN U TNEWBYDOVER CLEVELAND 10THDUNNICA 8THWI N N E B A G O PERSH I N G OFALL O N MICHIGANPLYMOUTH THERESAMARIET T A SUMMITGR E E R CENTRALHENRIETTA PAT T O N BRUNO WE S T M I N S T E R WISE MAGNOLIA CHEROKEE SA C R A M E N T O CARR23RDHADLEYBECK TAYLORAVONDALE11THLA B A D I E HA V E N 14TH13THLINDENWOOD GR E E R AM E L I A 2ND CALIFORNIACHRISTYDAVI S O N MAIDE N EM M A AMHERSTWESTTHOLOZAN VERNON LINDENWOOD OLEATHA WYOMI N G CHAMB E R S BRISTOL FOREST PARK PA G ELUCAS N HUNTHAN LEY DELMAR CLAYTON BI R C H E R FORES T P A R K GRA V OI S NA T U R A L B R I D G E CHIPPEWA MANCHESTER O L I V E RIVERVIEWST C H A R L E S R O C K WATSON LEWISNCLARKCHIPPEWARIVERVIEW§¨¦70 §¨¦64 §¨¦44 §¨¦55BROADWAY GRANDHAMPTONSKINKER7THWEST F LOR ISSAN T CHOUT E A U TUCKERD R M A R T I N L U T H E R K I N G BIG BENDJAMIESONJEFFERSONH A L L S F E R R Y RIVE R VI E W LOUGHBOROU G H PALM F L O R IS S A N T MICHIGANKINGSHIGHW A Y KINGSHIGHWAYLO U G H B O R O U G H JEFFERSONFLORISSANTR IV E R V I E W KINGSHIGHWAYKINGSHIGHWAYKING S HI G H W A Y FLORISSANT GRANDKINGSHIGHWAYBROADWAYFLORISSANT KINGSHIGHWAYCentral Harlem Creek Humboldt, Baden Ferry Southern Arsenal Prairie Utah Gimblin Dakota Rocky Branch, Salisbury Lemay North Louisa, Trudeau, Barton Biddle, Chambers South-Benton ¶ Legend !(Demolition Locations CSO Regions St. Louis City St. Louis County T h e M e t r o p o l i t a n S t . L o u i s S e w e r D i s t r i c t D a t e : 11 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 5 S c a l e : N T S CSO VOLUME REDUCTIONGREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMPILOT PROGRAM FUNDEDDEMOLITION LOCATIONS MISSISSIP PI RI V E R APPENDIX EE PILOT MONITORING DATA – ELECTRONIC FILE ON CD Geotechnical Engineering • Water Resources • Construction Engineering & Quality Control • Environmental Restoration & Permitting AASHTO National Laboratory Accreditation M3-MSD Green Infrastructure Task 12 Infiltration Testing 2015 1055 corporate square drive st. louis, mo 63132 phone: 314.993.4132 fax: 314.993.4177 www.reitzjens.com May 22 , 2015 Ms. Susan McCrary, PE Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District 2350 Market Street St. Louis, MO 63103 Re: Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District GSA - Green Infrastructure Pilot Program (11048) Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing Results 2015 Dear Ms. McCrary, The following presents the results of the infiltration testing at 5 locations as part of the Green Infrastructure Pilot Program. The field testing included 14 infiltrometer tests. Three (3) infiltration tests were completed at the 4228-4240 Warne Ave. site, three (3) at the 3832-3834 Labadie Ave. site, three (3) at 2818 N. Vandeventer Ave, three (3) at 5099 Geraldine Ave., and two (2) in the alley north of Utah Place and west of Grand Ave. The Double Ring Infiltrometer tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D3385, and the MSD “CSO Volume Reduction Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Work Plan for Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing” dated October 30, 2013. Infiltration Testing Procedure Prior to performing the tests at the Warne and Labadie sites, the soil at each test location was first saturated overnight. This was accomplished with a 55-gallon drum with a perforated bottom. The drum was installed at the test location and the perimeter edge of the drum was sealed with Bentonite crumbles to direct the majority of the water vertically into the immediate test area. The drum was then filled with water and allowed to percolate water into the test soil overnight. The next day double ring infiltrometers were installed at the Warne and Labadie Sites. The Utah, Geraldine and N. Vandeventer sites were not pre-saturated before testing. The infiltrometers consist of two steel pipes with a cutting edge on one side of each pipe, which are placed so that they form an annular area and a central testing area. The inner rings are about 8 inch diameter, and the outer rings are about 16 inch diameter. The pipes were installed by hammering them into the ground with a sledge hammer. Our target depths for the outer and inner rings were 4-inch and 1-inch deep respectively. The suggested depths from ASTM are 6-inch and 2-inch respectively, but no minimum depths are specified-only that they should be deep enough to create a seal to reduce water flow between the two rings and from the outer ring to the exposed ground. These depths were achieved only in rare cases due to underground obstructions such as gravel, bricks and miscellaneous debris which made driving to the specified depths impractical. MSD GSA Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Page 2 2015 Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing May 22, 2015 REITZ & JENS, INC. These tests were run at the deepest possible depths, using the equipment described in the work plan, and were monitored for water leakage under the rings. Tests that were noticeably leaking were discontinued and noted; all other tests were completed and calculated in general accordance with the ASTM specification. At the Utah and Grand permeable alley, the edges of the infiltrometer pipes were beaded with plumber’s putty, and set on the pavement. Leaks were repaired with additional putty. After the infiltrometers were installed, they were filled with 2 to 7 inches of water, and the water level was monitored for up to 4 hrs. During monitoring, the infiltrometers were refilled either manually or using a vacuum marionette system to maintain a constant water level within the rings. See Photo 1 for a fully setup and running pair of infiltrometers. Photo 1: Two double ring infiltrometers running at Labadie Ave in 2013. Infiltration tests with high infiltration rates ran for a shorter length of time, with more frequent readings. The length of time for the tests was partially limited by the time of day that the tests were started. No infiltrometer equipment was to be left onsite overnight, and all materials were removed by 3:00 PM. It is our opinion that the testing performed accurately represents the site MSD GSA Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Page 3 2015 Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing May 22, 2015 REITZ & JENS, INC. conditions. The soil material and condition in the top 1 foot at the Warne and Labadie sites and in the top 3 feet at the N. Vandeventer and Geraldine bioretention sites were determined in 2013, and are reproduced on our data sheets for 2015 with minor changes. The weather and water temperatures were also noted. This information is recorded on the data sheets. The locations of the tests were measured relative to existing structures. We have revised our testing location nomenclature, so that it is consistent from year to year, to provide summary tables for each site tested. The sketches of the testing locations are presented in Figures 15-0 through 19-1 and the summary tables are presented below. Results The results of the double ring infiltration tests are presented in Figures 1 to 14. These include plots of the incremental flow. These plots are somewhat misleading as many of the flows are so small that they are lower than the error created by temperature variations, the system’s ability to respond, evaporation, and reading error. We recommend that the total volume of water for the total test time be used to determine the average infiltration rate. Below are summary tables for each site noting the average infiltration rates for testing during the years of 2013, 2014 and 2015. Table 1: Summary of Infiltration Results 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 Pervious Pavement A 5.4 23.0 70.8 9.6 25.9 27.0 Pervious Pavement B *4.3 105.6 *20.3 33.6 Utah Pervious Alleyway Inner Ring Infiltration Rate (cm/hr) Outer Ring Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Soil Preparation Location 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 Bioretention A 43.64 746.00 210.69 28.77 na na Bioretention B *556.00 199.98 *na na Bioretention C *907.00 572.75 *na na Geraldine Avenue Soil Preparation Location Inner Ring Infiltration Rate (cm/hr) Outer Ring Infiltration Rate (cm/hr) 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 Bioretention A *0.72 1.50 *0.17 2.19 Bioretention B 0.04 0.78 0.23 0.02 1.45 0.05 Bioretention C *16.45 38.24 *11.20 38.07 N. Vandeventer Avenue Soil Preparation Location Inner Ring Infiltration Rate (cm/hr) Outer Ring Infiltration Rate (cm/hr) * Denotes tests that were not requested in the proposal for that year. “na” denotes test data that is not available. MSD GSA Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Page 4 2015 Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing May 22, 2015 REITZ & JENS, INC. 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 Compost Amended A 0.07 0.16 0.01 0.16 0.06 0.04 Compost Amended B leaking * *0.02 * * Unamended C 2.11 0.70 1.54 1.71 0.16 0.46 Unamended D 0.82 * *leaking * * Aerated E 0.06 0.07 0.02 0.44 0.10 0.02 Aerated F 0.04 * *leaking * * Labadie Avenue Soil Preparation Location Inner Ring Infiltration Rate (cm/hr) Outer Ring Infiltration Rate (cm/hr) 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 Compost Amended A 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.02 0.01 2.91 Compost Amended B 0.04 * *0.16 * * Unamended C 0.05 0.79 0.20 0.01 0.03 0.23 Unamended D 1.56 * *0.11 * * Aerated E leaking 0.05 0.29 leaking 0.06 0.92 Aerated F 0.43 * *0.23 * * Soil Preparation Location Inner Ring Infiltration Rate (cm/hr) Outer Ring Infiltration Rate (cm/hr) Warne Avenue * Denotes tests that were not requested in the proposal for that year. Large variations are seen between tests and over time at the Labadie and Warne Avenue Sites. We believe that this is due to the heterogeneous nature of the miscellaneous fill that underlies these sites, even at shallow depths (see the Photo 2). ASTM D3385 states: 1.3 This test method is particularly applicable to relatively uniform fine-grain soils, with an absence of very plastic (fat) clays and gravel-size particles and with moderate to low resistance to ring penetration. Gravel-sized material, including crushed limestone and bricks, were found at these two sites, which made driving of the rings very difficult, even after saturation. We also noted that the aerated sections of both sites encountered significant quantities of gravel and cinders in the testing area. These conditions were not found at the other test areas on the sites, and may lead to a false comparison to the other testing locations. While we believe that this is a rigorous way to perform a scaled test on soils for the determination of infiltration rate, it may not be well suited for soils containing gravel or rubble fill. The heterogeneous nature of the rubble fill adds significant variability and inaccuracy for this small scale test. MSD GSA Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Page 5 2015 Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing May 22, 2015 REITZ & JENS, INC. Photo 2: Soil excavated from unamended area of Warne Avenue site in 2013. The pervious pavement site, at Utah and Grand Ave., displayed much less choking between the bricks with weeds and organics than in 2013 or 2014 (see Photos 3 and 4). We are unsure whether recent maintenance has been performed on this alley. Some compaction and settlement due to wheel rutting had occurred along the length of the alley. We believe that this had a significant impact on the alley’s infiltration. The area of the test was chosen so that it was outside of the wheel rutting and was located where less weeds and organics were present. The infiltration rates appear to be significantly faster than the 2013 and 2014 rates. At the 5099 Geraldine site, the infiltration rate was much faster than our marionette system could provide water. In order to approximate the infiltration rate, we gravity fed water from our water tank into the infiltration rings. The flow rate from the tank was varied by using the valve on the tank to maintain a steady water head in the rings. When a steady state flow rate was found, we measured the flow rate out of the tank using a 5-gallon bucket and a stopwatch. At the 2818 N. Vandeventer Avenue site, we found the bioretention soil at testing locations A and B to be hard, but not as hard as in 2013 or 2014. These two locations had infiltration rates that were comparable to the 2014 results. The bioretention soil at test location C was significantly softer, although the soil material appeared to be the same. The infiltration rate was significantly faster at location C compared to the other two locations. MSD GSA Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Page 6 2015 Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing May 22, 2015 REITZ & JENS, INC. Photo 3: Interior view of double ring infiltrometer at Utah and Grand site in 2013. Note weeds and black organics in cracks between bricks (chat gravel is light gray). MSD GSA Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Page 7 2015 Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing May 22, 2015 REITZ & JENS, INC. Photo 4: Double ring infiltrometer site at Utah and Grand site in 2015. Note less organics and very few weeds (chat gravel is light gray). If you have any questions regarding the infiltration testing please contact us at 314-993-4132, ext. 239 or ccook@reitzjens.com. We appreciate the opportunity to continue our working relationship with MSD. Sincerely, REITZ & JENS, Inc.. Christopher W. Cook, P.E. Project Engineer MSD GSA Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Page 8 2015 Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing May 22, 2015 REITZ & JENS, INC. The following figures are attached and complete this memorandum: Figures 1 and 2 Infiltration Data and Plot for Utah and Grand Pervious Pavement Figures 3 to 5 Infiltration Data and Plot for Geraldine Bioretention Figures 6 to 8 Infiltration Data and Plot for N. Vandeventer Bioretention Figures 9 to 11 Infiltration Data and Plots for 4228-4240 Warne Avenue Site Figures 12 to 14 Infiltration Data and Plots for 3832-3834 Labadie Avenue Site Figures 15-0 to 15-1 Sketch and Photograph of Infiltration Testing Location at Geraldine Site Figures 16-0 to 16-1 Sketch and Photograph of Infiltration Testing Location at N. Vandeventer Avenue Site Figures 17-0 to 17-1 Sketch and Photograph of Infiltration Testing Locations at Warne Site Figures 18-0 to 18-3 Sketch and Photographs of Infiltration Testing Locations at Labadie Site Figures 19-0 to 19-1 Sketch and Photograph of Infiltration Testing Locations at Utah Pervious Alleyway Site p:\mthree\2011101301\task 12 - infiltration testing 2015\doc\report\m3-msd green infrastructure task 12 infiltration testing 2015.doc Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:Pervious Pavement: Bricks with chat gravel Test Location:2015-A (1)Liquid Used: Water Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in)Annular area 851 cm2 1: south 14.28 18.24 9.6 13.8 2: north 14.28 18.36 9.84 14.04 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 14.3 18.3 9.7 13.9 Length Ring (in):14.3 18.3 avg head (in)4.6 4.4 Length Penetration (in):0.0 0.0 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/6/2015 9:49 AM 0 1.5 0.0 3.7 0.0 50 0.0 1 2 5/6/2015 9:51 AM 2 12.7 889.3 8.2 357.3 2.0 87.76 12.60 1 3 5/6/2015 9:52 AM 3 19 500.2 15 539.9 1.0 98.73 38.07 1 4 5/6/2015 9:53 AM 4 25 476.4 21.3 500.2 1.0 94.03 35.27 1 5 5/6/2015 9:54 AM 5 30.7 452.6 26.7 428.8 1.0 89.33 30.23 1 6 5/6/2015 9:55 AM 6 36.5 460.5 32.8 484.3 1.0 90.89 34.15 2 1 5/6/2015 10:10 AM 0 1.3 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 2 2 5/6/2015 10:11 AM 1 5.2 309.7 6.6 182.6 1.0 61.12 12.88 2 3 5/6/2015 10:12 AM 2 9 301.7 12 428.8 1.0 59.55 30.23 2 4 5/6/2015 10:13 AM 3 12.5 277.9 16.8 381.1 1.0 54.85 26.87 2 5 5/6/2015 10:14 AM 4 16 277.9 21.7 389.1 1.0 54.85 27.43 2 6 5/6/2015 10:15 AM 5 20 317.6 28.8 563.7 1.0 62.68 39.75 2 7 5/6/2015 10:16 AM 6 22.3 182.6 32.7 309.7 1.0 36.04 21.83 2 8 5/6/2015 10:17 AM 7 25 214.4 38 420.8 1.0 42.31 29.67 70.76 27.04Average Infiltration Rate Outer marionette empty, restart test 70 degrees, Partly cloudy CWC/ JJP Liquid Temp Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc. MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing Alley North of Utah and Grand Date Incremental Infiltration RateInner Ring Annular SpaceTimeTest Depth of ring top to waterDepth of ring top to soil Reading Flow Readings Elapsed Time Δ (total) min 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00 100.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular Test 2 Inner Test 2 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 1 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:Pervious Pavement: Bricks with chat gravel Test Location:2015-B (2)Liquid Used: Water Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in)Annular area 851 cm2 1: south 14.28 18.24 12.24 16.2 2: north 14.28 18.48 12.24 16.2 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 14.3 18.4 12.2 16.2 Length Ring (in):14.3 18.3 avg head (in)2.0 2.2 Length Penetration (in):0.0 0.0 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/6/2015 10:42 AM 0 15.5 0.0 8.1 0.0 50 0.0 1 2 5/6/2015 10:43 AM 1 22 516.1 13.9 460.5 1.0 101.86 32.47 1 3 5/6/2015 10:44 AM 2 29 555.8 20.4 516.1 1.0 109.70 36.39 1 4 5/6/2015 10:45 AM 3 34.7 452.6 26.4 476.4 1.0 89.32 33.59 2 1 5/6/2015 10:10 AM 0 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 2 2 5/6/2015 10:11 AM 1 8 595.5 6.3 428.8 1.0 117.53 30.23 2 3 5/6/2015 10:12 AM 2 15.5 595.5 12.8 516.1 1.0 117.53 36.39 2 4 5/6/2015 10:13 AM 3 22.5 555.8 18.8 476.4 1.0 109.70 33.59 2 5 5/6/2015 10:14 AM 4 29 516.1 25 492.3 1.0 101.86 34.71 2 6 5/6/2015 10:15 AM 5 35.2 492.3 30.6 444.6 1.0 97.16 31.35 105.58 33.59Average Infiltration Rate Alley North of Utah and Grand MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min Inner Ring Annular Space CWC/ JJP Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Flow Readings 70 degrees, Partly cloudy Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration Rate Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc. Inner marionette empty, restart test 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular Test 2 Inner Test 2 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 2 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:Bioretention Depths Test Location:Liquid Used: Water 0'-0.5' Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm 0.5'-2.0' Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 2.0'-2.5' side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in) Annular area 851 cm2 2.5'-3.0' 1: south 15.96 12 Total Area 1155 cm^2 2: north 15.96 12 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 16.0 12.0 Length Ring (in): 18.36 avg head (in)4.0 Length Penetration (in):2.4 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/7/2015 9:30 AM 0 0.0 65 0.0 1 2 4.92 18927.0 4.9 199.98 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 199.98Average Infiltration Rate Soil Description Pea Gravel Brown Sand, some silt Dark brown Silty Clay Brown Silty Sand Geraldine MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min 2015-B (1) CWC/JJP Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration RateInner Ring 70 degrees, cloudy 5 gallons in 4min : 55 sec Permeability too fast for marionette system Ground Temp: 65 degrees Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc. 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 3 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:Bioretention Depths Test Location:Liquid Used: Water 0'-0.5' Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm 0.5'-2.0' Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 2.0'-2.5' side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in) Annular area 851 cm2 2.5'-3.0' 1: south 15 12 Total Area 1155 cm^2 2: north 15 12 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 15.0 12.0 Length Ring (in): 18.36 avg head (in)3.0 Length Penetration (in):3.4 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/7/2015 9:30 AM 0 0.0 65 0.0 1 2 4.67 18927.0 4.7 210.69 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 210.69Average Infiltration Rate Soil Description Pea Gravel Brown Sand, some silt Dark brown Silty Clay Brown Silty Sand Permeability too fast for marionette system Ground Temp: 65 degrees Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water 5 gallons in 4min : 40 sec Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration Rate Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc.Inner Ring 70 degrees, cloudy MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing 2015-A (2) CWC/JJP Geraldine 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 4 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:Bioretention Depths Test Location:Liquid Used: Water 0'-0.5' Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm 0.5'-2.0' Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 2.0'-2.5' side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in) Annular area 851 cm2 2.5'-3.0' 1: south 13.92 10.8 Total Area 1155 cm^2 2: north 13.92 10.8 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 13.9 10.8 Length Ring (in): 18.36 avg head (in)3.1 Length Penetration (in):4.4 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/7/2015 9:30 AM 0 0.0 65 0.0 1 2 1.72 18927.0 1.7 572.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 572.75Average Infiltration Rate Soil Description Pea Gravel Brown Sand, some silt Dark brown Silty Clay Brown Silty Sand Permeability too fast for marionette system Ground Temp: 65 degrees Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water 5 gallons in 4min : 55 sec Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration Rate Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc.Inner Ring 70 degrees, cloudy MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing 2015-C (3) CWC/JJP Geraldine 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 5 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:Bioretention Depths Test Location:Liquid Used: Water 0'-0.2' Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm 0.2'-2.5' Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 2.5'-3.0' side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in)Annular area 851 cm2 1: south 11.4 13.44 8.64 10.8 2: north 10.8 14.16 7.8 10.92 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 11.1 13.8 8.2 10.9 Length Ring (in):14.76 18.48 avg head (in)2.9 2.9 Length Penetration (in):3.7 4.7 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/11/2015 10:51 AM 0 9.7 0.0 4.8 0.0 65 0.0 1 2 11:06 AM 15 11.3 127.0 10.6 460.5 15.0 1.67 2.16 1 3 11:14 AM 23 11.8 39.7 14.8 333.5 8.0 0.98 2.94 1 4 11:42 AM 51 14.1 182.6 26.4 921.0 28.0 1.29 2.32 1 5 12:05 PM 74 16.5 190.6 36.3 786.1 23.0 1.64 2.41 2 1 5/11/2015 12:19 PM 0 17.6 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 2 2 12:30 PM 11 18.6 79.4 7.6 341.4 11.0 1.42 2.19 2 3 12:39 PM 20 19.2 47.6 11.1 277.9 9.0 1.04 2.18 2 4 12:54 PM 35 21 142.9 17.3 492.3 15.0 1.88 2.31 2 5 1:04 PM 45 22.1 87.3 19.6 182.6 10.0 1.72 1.29 2 6 1:14 PM 55 23.2 87.3 24 349.4 10.0 1.72 2.46 2 7 1:24 PM 65 24.4 95.3 27.7 293.8 10.0 1.88 2.07 2 8 1:34 PM 75 25.1 55.6 30.1 190.6 10.0 1.10 1.34 1.50 2.19Average Infiltration Rate Soil Description Pea Gravel Very dense compost with sand and silt Brown fine to medium grain sand N. Vandeventer MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min 2015-A (1) CWC/JJP Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration RateInner Ring Annular Space 57 degrees, sunny 60-70 degrees, cloudy Ground Temp: 70 degrees Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc. Outer marionette empty, restart test 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular Test 2 Inner Test 2 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 6 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:Bioretention DepthsSoil Description Test Location:Liquid Used: Water 0'-0.2' Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm 0.2'-2.5' Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 2.5'-3.0' side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in)Annular area 851 cm2 1: south 11.76 11.52 8.4 7.56 2: north 12.24 13.2 9.36 8.64 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 12.0 12.4 8.9 8.1 Length Ring (in):14.28 18.24 avg head (in)3.1 4.3 Length Penetration (in):2.3 5.9 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/11/2015 11:35 AM 0 7.6 0.0 17.2 0.0 65 0.0 1 2 11:36 AM 1 9.7 166.7 24.9 611.4 1.0 32.91 43.11 1 3 11:37 AM 2 12 182.6 31 484.3 1.0 36.04 34.15 1 4 11:38 AM 3 14.6 206.4 37.6 524.0 1.0 40.74 36.95 1 5 11:39 AM 4 17 190.6 1.0 37.61 2 1 5/11/2015 11:57 AM 0 14.8 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 2 2 11:58 AM 1 18 254.1 12.7 690.8 1.0 50.15 48.70 2 3 11:59 AM 2 20.3 182.6 18.7 476.4 1.0 36.04 33.59 2 4 12:00 PM 3 22.7 190.6 25.2 516.1 1.0 37.61 36.39 2 5 12:01 PM 4 25.2 198.5 31.2 476.4 1.0 39.18 33.59 2 6 12:02 PM 5 27.7 198.5 38 539.9 1.0 39.18 38.07 2 7 12:03 PM 6 29.8 166.7 1.0 32.91 38.24 38.07Average Infiltration Rate Pea Gravel Loose compost with sand and silt Brown fine to medium grain sand MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing 2015-C (2) CWC/JJP N. Vandeventer Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc. Outer marionette below reading level Outer marionette empty, restart test Inner Ring Annular Space 60-70 degrees, cloudy Ground Temp: 70 degrees Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration Rate 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular Test 2 Inner Test 2 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 7 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:Bioretention Depths Test Location:Liquid Used: Water 0'-0.2' Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm 0.2'-2.5' Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 2.5'-3.0' side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in) Annular area 851 cm2 1: south 11.4 13.08 9 10.2 2: north 11.28 12.84 8.64 10.08 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 11.3 13.0 8.8 10.1 Length Ring (in):14.28 18.48 avg head (in)2.5 2.8 Length Penetration (in):2.9 5.5 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 10/29/2014 11:04 AM 0 1.5 0.0 9.5 0.0 65 0.0 1 2 11:19 AM 15 1.6 7.9 9.9 31.8 15.0 0.10 0.15 1 3 11:41 AM 37 1.6 0.0 10 7.9 22.0 0.00 0.03 1 4 12:20 PM 76 2.1 39.7 10.1 7.9 39.0 0.20 0.01 1 5 12:40 PM 96 2.5 31.8 10.1 0.0 20.0 0.31 0.00 1 6 1:28 PM 144 3.5 79.4 10.3 15.9 48.0 0.33 0.02 1 7 1:53 PM 169 3.6 7.9 10.7 31.8 25.0 0.06 0.09 1 8 2:04 PM 180 4 39.7 10.7 31.8 11.0 0.71 0.20 0.21 0.05Average Infiltration Rate Soil Description Pea Gravel Very dense compost with sand and silt Brown fine to medium grain sand Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Ground Temp: 70 degrees Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration Rate Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc.Inner Ring Annular Space 60-70 degrees, cloudy MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing 2015-B (3) CWC/JJP N. Vandeventer 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 8 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:Aerated, brown silty clay rubble fill Test Location:Liquid Used: Water Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in)Annular area 851 cm2 1: east 12.12 15.72 8.76 12.36 2: west 12 15.24 9 12.36 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 12.1 15.5 8.9 12.4 Length Ring (in):14.28 18.36 avg head (in)5.4 6.0 Length Penetration (in):2.2 2.9 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/13/2015 10:17 0 5.9 0.0 5.5 0.0 65 0.0 1 2 11:17 60 7 87.3 18.8 1056.0 60.0 0.29 1.24 1 3 11:49 92 8 79.4 26.7 627.3 32.0 0.49 1.38 1 4 12:13 116 8.5 39.7 33 500.2 24.0 0.33 1.47 1 5 13:39 202 9 39.7 36.8 301.7 86.0 0.09 0.25 2 1 12:49 0 9.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 2 2 13:19 30 10.3 87.3 5.8 436.7 30.0 0.57 1.03 2 4 13:44 55 10.9 47.6 11.1 420.8 25.0 0.38 1.19 0.29 0.92Average Infiltration Rate Outer marionette empty, restart test 60-70 degrees, sunny Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc. Ground Temp: 65 degrees Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration RateInner Ring Annular Space MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min 2015-E (1) CWC/ JJP Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Warne 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 0 50 100 150 200 250Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular Test 2 Inner Test 2 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 9 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:Unamended brown silty clay fill with rubble Test Location:Liquid Used: Water Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in)Annular area 851 cm2 1: east 12.12 12.36 8.76 12.6 2: west 12 15.36 8.64 12.24 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 12.1 13.9 8.7 12.4 Length Ring (in):14.4 18.36 avg head (in)5.7 5.9 Length Penetration (in):2.3 4.5 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/13/2015 11:18 0 2.8 0.0 3.7 0.0 65 0.0 1 2 12:11 53 2.8 0.0 5.7 158.8 53.0 0.00 0.21 1 3 13:01 103 2.8 0.0 7.5 142.9 50.0 0.00 0.20 1 4 13:45 147 4.9 166.7 9.6 166.7 44.0 0.75 0.27 1 5 14:20 182 5.1 15.9 11.2 127.0 35.0 0.09 0.26 0.20 0.23Average Infiltration Rate Ground Temp: 65 degrees 60-70 degrees, sunny Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration Rate Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc.Inner Ring Annular Space 2015-C (2) CWC/ JJP Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min Warne MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 0 50 100 150 200 250Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 10 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:4-inches compost over brown silty clay fill Test Location:Liquid Used: Water Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in)Annular area 851 cm2 1: east 12.96 16.08 8.64 10.92 2: west 12.48 15.36 8.16 11.04 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 12.7 15.7 8.4 11.0 Length Ring (in):14.52 17.52 avg head (in)6.1 6.5 Length Penetration (in):1.8 1.8 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/13/2015 11:37 0 2.4 0.0 7.1 0.0 65 0.0 1 2 12:10 33 3.1 55.6 24.3 1365.7 33.0 0.33 2.92 1 3 13:02 85 3.5 31.8 52.0 0.12 2 1 13:17 0 5.2 0.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 2 2 13:46 29 5.2 0.0 26.6 1064.0 29.0 0.00 2.59 2 3 14:08 51 5.4 15.9 39.6 1032.2 22.0 0.14 3.31 0.15 2.91Average Infiltration Rate Ground Temp: 65 degrees Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration RateInner Ring Annular Space 60-70 degrees, sunny Outer marionette below reading level Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc. Outer marionette empty, restart test MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min 2015-A (3) CWC/ JJP Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Warne 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular Test 2 Inner Test 2 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 11 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:4-6" Compost over brown silty clay with rubble fill Test Location:Liquid Used: Water Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in)Annular area 851 cm2 1: south 12 16.32 8.04 11.76 2: north 11.64 14.52 7.8 10.8 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 11.8 15.4 7.9 11.3 Length Ring (in):14.4 18.24 avg head (in)6.5 7.0 Length Penetration (in):2.6 2.8 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/14/2015 10:09 0 5.2 6 60 0.0 1 2 10:56 47 5.4 15.9 6.6 47.6 47.0 0.07 0.07 1 3 11:30 81 5.4 0.0 6.8 15.9 34.0 0.00 0.03 1 4 11:53 104 5.4 0.0 6.8 0.0 23.0 0.00 0.00 1 5 12:25 136 5.4 0.0 6.8 0.0 32.0 0.00 0.00 2 6 13:02 0 5.4 9.8 2 7 13:32 30 5.4 0.0 10.2 31.8 30.0 0.00 0.07 2 8 13:58 56 5.4 0.0 10.3 7.9 26.0 0.00 0.02 2 9 14:24 82 5.4 0.0 10.4 7.9 26.0 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.04Average Infiltration Rate Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration RateInner Ring Annular Space Cloudy/Rainy 55-65 degrees Ground Temp: 65 degrees Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc. Reset test due to no movement in 1.5 hrs MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min 2015-A (1) CWC/JJP Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Labadie 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular Test 2 Inner Test 2 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 12 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:4-6" Compost over brown silty clay with rubble fill Test Location:Liquid Used: Water Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in)Annular area 851 cm2 1: south 12 14.28 7.44 11.4 2: north 12 14.4 7.44 11.52 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 12.0 14.3 7.4 11.5 Length Ring (in):14.52 18.24 avg head (in)7.1 6.8 Length Penetration (in):2.5 3.9 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/14/2015 10:28 0 2.7 2.4 60 0.0 1 2 10:57 29 6.8 325.5 3.2 63.5 29.0 2.22 0.15 1 3 11:24 56 10.3 277.9 4.6 111.2 27.0 2.03 0.29 1 4 11:54 86 13.1 222.3 18.3 1087.8 30.0 1.46 2.56 1 5 12:27 119 15.7 206.4 18.6 23.8 33.0 1.23 0.05 1 5 13:06 158 19.4 293.8 19 31.8 39.0 1.49 0.06 2 1 13:06 0 23.3 21.6 2 2 13:33 27 24.8 119.1 21.8 15.9 27.0 0.87 0.04 2 3 13:59 53 27.3 198.5 22.4 47.6 26.0 1.51 0.13 1.54 0.46Average Infiltration Rate Labadie MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min 2015-C (2) CWC/JJP Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration Rate Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc.Inner Ring Annular Space Cloudy/Rainy 55-65 degrees Ground Temp: 65 degrees Reset Test 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular Test 2 Inner Test 2 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 13 Project Name: Site Name:Soil type/ Preperation:4-6" Compost over brown silty clay with rubble fill Test Location:Liquid Used: Water Tested by:Reading Constant 79.4 cm3/cm Area Inner Ring 304 cm2 side (mark dir.) inner (in) outer (in) inner (in) outer (in)Annular area 851 cm2 1: south 12.24 15.6 7.8 11.76 2: north 12.12 15 7.8 11.64 Inner Outer avg depth (in) 12.2 15.3 7.8 11.7 Length Ring (in):14.16 18.24 avg head (in)6.4 6.5 Length Penetration (in):2.0 2.9 Reading cm Flow cm3 Reading cm Flow cm3 Incremental Time (min) Inner cm/h Annular cm/h 1 1 5/14/2015 10:55 0 7.6 4.9 60 0.0 1 2 11:46 51 7.7 7.9 5.3 31.8 51.0 0.03 0.04 1 3 12:01 66 7.7 0.0 5.7 31.8 15.0 0.00 0.15 1 4 12:28 93 7.7 0.0 5.9 15.9 27.0 0.00 0.04 2 6 13:16 0 9.3 8.5 2 7 13:34 18 9.6 23.8 8.7 15.9 18.0 0.26 0.06 2 8 14:00 44 9.6 0.0 8.8 7.9 26.0 0.00 0.02 2 9 14:14 58 9.8 15.9 8.8 0.0 14.0 0.22 0.00 0.02 0.02Average Infiltration Rate Labadie MSD/M3: 2015 Infiltration Testing Test Reading Date Time Elapsed Time Δ (total) min 2015-E (3) CWC/JJP Depth of ring top to soil Depth of ring top to water Flow Readings Liquid Temp Incremental Infiltration Rate Remarks: Weather Conditions, etc.Inner Ring Annular Space Cloudy/Rainy 55-65 degrees Ground Temp: 65 degrees Reset test due to no movement in 1.5 hrs 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Incrimental Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)Elapsed Time (min) Test 1 Inner Test 1 Annular Test 2 Inner Test 2 Annular REITZ & JENS, INC.Figure 14 REITZ & JENS, INC 0 10 20 SCALE FEET i MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Geraldine Avenue 2015 Infiltration Testing Sketch of Testing Locations Figure 15-0 REITZ & JENS, INC. Figure 15-1 MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Geraldine Avenue Infiltration Testing Photograph of testing locations at Geraldine bioretention site, standing on the edge of Thekla Avenue, looking southwest. '1 i Mt ' 2015 Test Locati lir y l3 eiLLocatio t REITZ & JENS, INC 0 10 20 SCALE FEET MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program N. Vandeventer Avenue 2015 Infiltration Testing Sketch of Testing Locations Figure 16-0 REITZ & JENS, INC. Figure 16-1 MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program N. Vandeventer Avenue Infiltration Testing Photograph of testing locations at N. Vandeventer bioretention site, standing on northeast corner of site, looking west. REITZ & JENS, INC 0 10 20 SCALE FEET 15 Test Lech ';� > 015-# 14 est ocation 2014-# - MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Warne Avenue 2015 Infiltration Testing Sketch of Testing Locations Figure 17-0 REITZ & JENS, INC. Figure 17-1 . MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Warne Avenue Infiltration Testing Photograph of testing locations at Warne Avenue site, standing on Warne Avenue, looking southeast REITZ & JENS, INC 0 10 20 SCALE FEET 1- MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Labadie Avenue 2015 Infiltration Testing Sketch of Testing Locations Figure 18-0 REITZ & JENS, INC. Figure 18-1 MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Labadie Avenue Infiltration Testing Photograph of testing location A at Labadie Avenue site, standing on Labadie Avenue, looking south. REITZ & JENS, INC. Figure 18-2 MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Labadie Avenue Infiltration Testing Photograph of testing location C at Labadie Avenue site, standing at center of site, looking east. REITZ & JENS, INC. Figure 18-3 MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Labadie Avenue Infiltration Testing Photograph of testing location E at Labadie Avenue site, standing at center of site, looking south. REITZ & JENS, INC 0 20 40 SCALE FEET MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Utah Pervious Alleyway 2015 Infiltration Testing Sketch of Testing Locations Figure 19-0 REITZ & JENS, INC. Figure 19-1 MSD: Green Infrastructure Pilot Program Utah Pervious Alleyway Infiltration Testing Photograph of testing locations at Utah Pervious Alleyway site. Standing in center of alleyway behind property at 3626 Humphrey Street, looking west towards garage for property at 3630 Humphrey Street.