Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout12-2006 Full PacketCITY OF MEDINA 2052 COUNTY ROAD 24 MEDINA, MN 55340 AGENDA MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY December 12, 2006 7:00 P.M. MEDINA CITY HALL 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comments 3. Update from City Council proceedings 4. City Planner's Report 5. Approval of October 10, 2006 Planning Commission minutes 6. Rising Sun Memorial Park — Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review for creation of a cemetery in the Rural Residential (RR) district — 3365 Highway 55 (PID 05-118-23-11-0003). (Continued Public Hearing) 7. Ryan Companies — PUD Amendment for Medina Clydesdale Marketplace, Lot 2, Block 2, for the construction of a multi -tenant retail building. (Public Hearing Closed) 8. Ebert Construction, Harry Schleeter — Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure over 3000 sq. ft. in the Rural Residential (RR) zoning district — 1585 Medina Road (PID 23-118-23-22-0004). (Public Hearing) 9. RJ Ryan Company, Peter Hasselquist — Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure over 3000 sq. ft. in the Rural Residential (RR) zoning district — 2705 Willow Drive (PID 16-118-23-41-0004). (Public Hearing) 10. Adjourn Posted in City Hall December 7, 2006 Agenda Item No. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING REPORT Medina Planning Commission Jennifer Haskamp, Landform through Rose Lorsung, City Planner December 6, 2006 for the December 12, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting Ryan Companies US Inc. Request for approval of a PUD Amendment for Medina Clydesdale Marketplace for a multi -tenant retail building Landform Project # MED06017 REVIEW DEADLINE: January 30, 2007 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting approval of a PUD amendment to allow the construction of a multi - tenant building with a drive -through. The Applicant made their first submittal to the Planning Commission on September 13, 2006 at which time it was recommended that they revise their plan. This submission attempts to respond to some of their recommendations and concerns. In the Applicant's first submission, they had requested a re -plat of the property; however, given the new concept, the Applicant has retracted this request as the proposed plan adheres to the approved final plat described in Resolution Number 2005-54. The proposed plan includes 6,000 square feet of retail and will require a PUD Amendment due to the proposed drive -through associated with the coffee shop. The original agreement for Medina Clydesdale Marketplace project allowed for up to a 6,300-square foot retail building and no drive -through uses except for the bank site. The drive -through has resulted in the need for a PUD amendment which, requires a review process similar to that of a PUD concept plan. The proposed development plans and elevations also show a bagel shop, which according to the original PUD agreement would also require an amendment because such a use would not have table service as required per the original agreement. The proposed businesses and tenants are not specifically identified in the proposed plan; however, this should be noted to the Applicant for future planning on the project site. 2. CONTEXT: A. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a Planned Unit Development amendment. A PUD amendment must be similar with the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and the approved PUD final plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements upon a PUD amendment not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community and surrounding area. Ryan Companies US Inc. Re: Medina Clydesdale Marketplace 3rd Addition Page 2 November 30, 2006 B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The proposed development is located in the Medina Marketplace development which was rezoned in 2005 to PUD-UC (Planned Unit Development Urban Commercial). This designation allows commercial development and promotes a comprehensive development approach to the entire Clydesdale Marketplace area to ensure an integrated and cohesive development. The property to the north of Clydesdale Marketplace is zoned UR (Urban Residential) and developed as single-family homes (Cherry Hill Farms). There are a number of properties which abut the site to the east. A couple of the properties to the east are zoned UC (Urban Commercial) and consist of auto related developments such as a gas station and oil change businesses. The Ace Phase II multi -tenant retail development abuts the property to the easy and also has shared access with the Clydesdale Marketplace development. To the east, across County Road 101, the property is zoned MR (Multi -Family Residential) and is developed as a high -density senior living facility (Gramercy). The property to the west of Clydesdale Marketplace is zoned UC (Urban Commercial) and is developed as a dance hall (Medina Ballroom). The property to the southwest, across Highway 55, is zoned UC (Urban Commercial) and the property to the southeast is zoned UP (Uptown Hamel). Both are developed with a mix of retail type uses. C. Natural Characteristics of the Site The subject property is vacant and has been cleared for development. 3. BACKGROUND: Ryan Companies received final plat and PUD final plan approval on September 20, 2005 for the Medina Clydesdale Marketplace development. Target is part of this development and opened in the fall of 2006. Per the original PUD and Plat agreement, the Medina Retail Clydesdale Marketplace Lot 2, Block 2 was originally planned for a single tenant and user. As proposed, the property will include a multi -tenant structure developed at approximately the same scale as the original plan and will not be required to re -plat. The Applicant is required to obtain a PUD amendment due to the proposed drive -through associated with a proposed coffee shop. 4. ANALYSIS: Consistency with Ordinance Standards PUD Amendment The PUD Amendment is reviewed under the same ordinance as a PUD concept plan. The purpose for the PUD Amendment is due to the Applicant's desire to add a drive -through for the coffee shop. Per Resolution Number 2005-55 condition 5, which approved the PUD final plan for Medina Clydesdale Marketplace, the only drive -through allowed was for the bank site. Because the proposed development is part of a larger concept for the Clydesdale Marketplace, it is important to review the proposed amendments and associated users for consistency with the existing development and the overall vision for the area. Staff notes that while the Applicant has proposed the drive -through for the coffee shop, once the building is constructed, staff will not be able to control the use of the space. Meaning, if the coffee shop closes, a fast food restaurant could take over the space. It is staff s opinion that a fast food user would not be Ryan Companies US Inc. Re: Medina Clydesdale Marketplace 3rd Addition Page 3 November 30, 2006 desirable because it would not contribute to the overall vision for the development which includes the desire to create a walkable and pedestrian friendly environment. The goal for the overall Clydesdale Marketplace is to attract a variety of users which ultimately would integrate destination locations (restaurants and coffee shops) and convenience retail (Target, etc.) so that residents have community gathering spaces as well and retail and shopping opportunities. In the Applicant's first submittal, the plan included a drive lane that provided access to the rear of the building. At the time of first submittal it was recommended to the Applicant to increase the relationship of the building with the core of the development and Clydesdale Trail to create a more pedestrian friendly and walkable environment. In response to this request, the Applicant removed the service road and has provided an outdoor patio for the coffee shop. Such changes have created some issues with respect to the internal organization of the structure, the external accessibility to mechanical and garbage facilities, and location of such uses to the outdoor gathering spaces. Such issues will be discussed further in subsequent sections of this review. Staff has reviewed the plans and also found an elevation which shows a bagel shop as part of the multi -tenant building. Staff notes that such uses are not permitted as part of the original PUD agreement and, depending on the desires of the Planning Commission and City council, could require a PUD plan amendment if the Applicant pursues such users as a part of the development. The original PUD agreement states that restaurants with table service are permitted, however, does not allow such users without table service. As such, a bagel shop, fast food, sandwich shop without table services, etc., would not be permitted without an amendment to the original PUD. Staff has reviewed the plans and has the following comments: Lighting 1. The outdoor lighting ordinance states a maximum illumination level of 1.5 foot candles at the property line. The Site Lighting Plan shows three areas in excess of 1.5 foot candles, all of which occur along the west access road to the property. The plan should be revised along this access road to be compliant with the regulations as stated in the ordinance. These requirements are based on the Zoning Classification E4 which allows for high ambient brightness in a development. The illumination post -curfew should adhere to a maximum of 0.6 foot candles at the property line. 2. The Applicant was asked during the last review to specify if the signage on the structure would be lit. This information was not provided in this submission, and should be provided to staff for analysis and comment. If the signs are to be lit, they will need to meet the requirements of the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. 3. The lighting fixture schedule does not specify the color of the poles. The color should be similar to others in the development, and a color, detail of the fixture should be provided. 4. The elevations show light fixtures attached to the facades of the structure. The Applicant should provide a detail of the proposed fixture for comment. The fixtures should be consistent with the architectural style of the proposed building. Ryan Companies US Inc. Re: Medina Clydesdale Marketplace 3rd Addition Page 4 November 30, 2006 Landscaping 1. The Applicant has proposed a four -foot fence along the trail on the northeast side of the site, and a fence along the rear fa9ade of portions of the structure. A colored rendering and an architectural detail of each fence must be submitted as this is adjacent to the heart of the development and such an architectural element may create a literal and perceived barrier between the structure and the rest of the development. Staff is concerned that such an element may be contrary to the vision for the development. Parking The parking meets the requirements of the overall PUD. As demonstrated on the submitted Site Plan, the drive -through aisle will accommodate stacking fo 5 cars. This is a reasonable amount of area allocated to stacking and is consistent with the recommendations made at the September 13th meeting. Staff has some concerns regarding the proposed location of the drive -through including proximity to the intersection and the visibility of the drive -through from Clydesdale Trail. The intent of the original PUD agreement was to encourage users and building orientations that would promote a walkable development at the core. The location of the drive - through is extremely visible from the core of the development which is contrary to the goals of the development. In addition, the proposed site plan shows the drive -through adjacent to the outdoor seating area. This appears to be a conflict of uses, as outdoor patrons are not likely to enjoy the noise or exhaust that might result from waiting cars. The drive -through location should be redesigned to respond to these issues. Signage 1. Based on the elevations provided, the average building height is 22', this number is based on the definition provided in the ordinance. As stated in the previous review, the original PUD agreement limited the stand alone retail buildings to a maximum of three signs. Since the PUD agreement, the Applicant has changed the use of the proposed structure to include multiple tenants in lieu of a single user. Based on this change, it would be reasonable for the Planning Commission to utilize the sign standards outline in the UC Zoning district to accommodate additional tenants. The UC zoning district allows 8% of the area of the wall on which the sign is located to be covered. Based on the elevations provided, on the primary facades (front and back) the proposed signage would comprise approximately 6% of the surface area, and on the sides approximately 2.5% of the surface area would be allocated to signage. If the Planning Commission utilizes the standards of the UC district, the proposed signage would meet those requirements. However, the Planning Commission may recommend or suggest an alteration to the UC district standards due to the change in use of the building. 2. As stated earlier, the Applicant must identify if the signs are to be lit. Based on the elevations it is assumed that the signs will be lit. The lit color and font should be consistent for each tenant and if the signs are lit they must meet the lighting ordinance requirements. Ryan Companies US Inc. Re: Medina Clydesdale Marketplace 3rd Addition Page 5 November 30, 2006 3. If the Applicant is proposing a menu board at the drive -through, a detail of the sign including the lighting should be provided. Architectural and Design Standards 1. There is no rooftop equipment identified on the plans. It assumed that all mechanicals will be located within the structure, if this is not true, the Applicant should provide a plan which identifies the location of all rooftop equipment. In addition, it should be noted that screening for such equipment is limited to a maximum of 8 feet in height. 2. The building materials must be provided in a percentage calculation. A minimum of 30% of the building must contain brick, natural stone, granite or stucco. The elevations appear to meet this requirement, but the percentages will confirm whether the requirement has been met. 3. The revised elevations are an improvement from the original submission; however, staff still has an issue with the elevation which faces Clydesdale Trail. Although the primary facade is proposed to face Highway 55, there remains the issue of promoting a walkable environment at the core of the Clydesdale Marketplace development. Staff understands the issues and complexity of having 2 primary entrances, particularly for some users who may require storage and or `behind closed doors' areas. However, it would be reasonable for some of the users to have to access doors on both facades, for example, a salon or coffee shop. Staff feels that a better job to promote a front facade on Clydesdale is necessary for this building to have the proper orientation within the development. Such improvements could include entrances on both facades, increased attention to architectural detail including more interesting doors, increased fenestration (regardless if literal or suggestive) and increased pedestrian scale elements on the Clydesdale Trail side. The Applicant shall revise the elevations, specifically the Clydesdale elevation to respond to these recommendations. 4. Staff is also concerned about the location of the trash and mechanical rooms located on the Clydesdale Trail side of the building. The trash and mechanical rooms are shown as hard - walled on the Concept Design with access only to the outside. This presents an issue for both accessibility of trash collectors and tenants of the structure. First and foremost, there is not an access drive for a trash collector and; therefore, an explanation of how the trash would be collected is necessary. In the opinion of staff, the location of the trash is not reasonable for trash collection as the only potential pick-up space would be in the drive -through lane which would be unsafe and a potential nuisance for those patrons utilizing the outdoor patio. In addition, the proximity of the trash to the outdoor patio area is incompatible and should be revised. Although the trash is in an enclosed hard -walled area according to the plan, it would still be likely that the area would constantly be accessed and would also require tenants to cross the patio area to access the trash room. This area should be revised and the trash and mechanical access reconsidered. The Applicant should provide a description as to how these areas would be used by all of the tenants in the structure and where trash collection would occur. 5. Staff recommends that the drive -through either be eliminated or relocated so as not to be visible from the primary intersection of the Clydesdale Marketplace development. In the Ryan Companies US Inc. Re: Medina Clydesdale Marketplace 3rd Addition Page 6 November 30, 2006 opinion of staff, the drive -through does not meet the original intent of the PUD agreement, specifically the proposed drive -through does not support the idea of a walkable development. If the Planning Commission is inclined to recommend approval of the drive -through, staff recommends the drive -through be located on the east side or south (rear) side of the building to be less obtrusive to the development. If the Planning Commission is satisfied with the location of the drive -through, at a minimum heavy landscaping and interesting signage should be encouraged to promote a more architecturally interesting view from the intersection. Further, the development guidelines, created by the Applicant for the overall PUD, support a walkable and pedestrian friendly environment. 5. CONCLUSION: The Applicant has proposed a drive -through lane for a coffee shop located on the west side of the building. While the Applicant has met some of the PUD concept plan criteria for the amendment, the location of the drive -through, site and architectural design does not meet the intent of the PUD. The space program is not functional, specifically the trash room is inaccessible to trash collectors due to the elimination of an access road. Due to the flexibility of the PUD, staff has identified areas of interest and concern throughout this report and has provided conditions of approval. The City is not under obligation to approve the PUD amendment. 6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the PUD amendment for the drive -through based upon the site design and interior space program. The site layout with the rear of the building on Clydesdale and the drive -through on the west elevation goes against the intent of the entire walkable, pedestrian -friendly concept of the development. The space program is also unreasonable due to the inaccessibility of the trash for collection. Relocation of this space will also require added thought and consideration to the tenants within the structure. If the PUD amendment is denied, the Applicant will have to redesign the site to meet the original PUD approvals and receive a site plan approval. Or, the Planning Commission may approve the PUD amendment. If the Planning Commission were to approve the PUD amendment, staff recommends that the approval be subject to the following conditions: Lighting: 1. The parking lot lights must meet the City's lighting ordinance, including curfew limitations. 2. The lighting plan shall be revised so that any light or combinations of lights do not exceed the pre -curfew maximum illumination level of 1.5 foot candles and the post -curfew maximum of 0.6 foot candle. 3. The Applicant shall specify if the proposed signage is to be lit. The signage must follow the lighting ordinance. Ryan Companies US Inc. Re: Medina Clydesdale Marketplace 3rd Addition Page 7 November 30, 2006 4. The lighting fixture schedule does not specify the color of the poles. The color should be similar to others in the development and shall be identified on the plan. 5. The Applicant shall provide details on any proposed building mounted lights and canopy lights. Landscaping: 6. A colored rendering and architectural detail of each fence must be submitted for review and approval by City staff. Architectural and Design Standards: 7. The elevations must be revised to identify the percentage of building materials used. 8. The building shall be comprised only of the materials permitted by the UC zoning ordinance. 9. Rooftop equipment, if applicable, shall be shown on the plans and shall be screened. Screening is limited to a maximum of 8 feet in height. 10. The Applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a layout that meets the intent of the PUD by providing at least two tenant spaces with an entrance on Clydesdale Trail. In addition, the fa9ade facing Clydesdale Trail shall include fenestration on all tenant spaces and doors should be designed to be architecturally significant so as to suggest that the fa9ade on Clydesdale is the front of building, even if the true front is on the Highway 55 side. 11. The site plan should be revised so that the drive -through is not visibly prominent at the intersection. This intersection is at the heart of the development, and the visibility of the drive -through is contrary to the vision for the development which includes a walkable and pedestrian friendly environment. The drive -through should be either removed or moved to the south or east side of the building. Signage: 12. All signs shall be in compliance with the sign matrix approved by staff dated June 20, 2005. 13. There shall be a maximum of _ signs allowed on the building. 14. There shall be a maximum of square feet of sign area allowed on the building. 15. The Applicant shall provide details for the menu board sign and directional signage for the drive -through. Other: 16. No construction work of any kind may take place within the Development except Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., and Saturday 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 17. The Applicant shall comply with the engineer memo dated November 21, 2006. 18. The Applicant shall comply with the building inspector/fire marshal memo dated August 30, 2006. Ryan Companies US Inc. Re: Medina Clydesdale Marketplace 3rd Addition Page 8 November 30, 2006 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Narrative dated November 13, 2006 3. Site Graphics dated November 13, 2006 4. Engineer's Memo, dated November 21, 2006 ;t WV:RYANLO (P.aN❑i.C6a November 13, 2006 Ms. Rose Lorsung Medina City Planner 2025 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: 1s` Addition Retail Outlot Clydesdale Marketplace Lot 2, Block 2 Rose, RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fine Submitted for PUD Amendment of the retail outlot building in the V Addition of Clydesdale Marketplace (previously called the 3td addition ). These plans have been modified based on staff & planning commissions comments. The following is changes to that plan set: • A one way entrance to the site from the northwest entry by the Ornamental Concrete four — way stop has been added. This will allow for a five car stacking ratio while still providing lccess to both the future proposed restaurant to the west and the proposed retail building. • A pedestrian plaza space has been created on the north side of the building. This is meant to continue to emphasize a strong pedestrian presence to the development. An ornamental fence and landscaping will be tied in to this area. a Glass has been wrapped around the comers of the north side of the building while breaking up the massing with a mix of building material and building height. O A design limitation has been maintaining proper stacking distance for pick up window on the west side of the building. This prevented us from rotating the building more towards the street. Ryan Companies is withdrawing the replat application that was originally submitted called 3rd Addition Clydesdale Marketplace Lot 1, Block 1 & 2. The new design works within the original plated boundaries of the site established within the Pt Addition Clydesdale Marketplace Plat. Should you have any questions please call me at 612-492-4435. Sincerely, Peter W. McEnery; RLA, ASLA Site Development Team Leader Senior Landscape Architect AZ LICENSE R0093146. CA LICENSE Spud , nR LCENSE CCR155932 CLYDESDALE MARKETPLACE - LOT 2, BLOCK 2 MEDINA, MINNESOTA 55340 PUD AMMENDMENT PROJECT CONTACTS OWNER RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 50 SOUTH TENTH STREET SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 MARK KAMPMEYER 612.492-4297 612-492-3297 (FAX) main korromeyer(tryancamrarres tam LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 50 SOUTH TENTH STREET SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 PETER MC ENERY 612.4924468 612.492.348E (FAX) Wet mceneryQryuamoaneccom ARCHITECT RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 50 SOUTH TENTH STREET SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 NATE ENGER 612.492.4245 612-492-3245 (FAX) mak en4ereryencen ores*am CIVIL ENGINEER RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 50 SOUTH TENTH STREET SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 CHRIS BRINK 612.492.4244 612-492.3244 (FAX) sins eAnkety ncollwares tam - `6s cc^d':S`i``'..."'.S .. riifr�'i[.. °r•. —... r...._ ., . CYAN' BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55403.2012 612492.4000 tel 612492-3000 fax W W W.RYANCOMPANIEiS.COM PROJECT ME MEDINA RETAIL CLYDESDALE MARKETPLACE LOT 2 BLOCK 2 LOCATION MEDINA MINNESOTA SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN REVISIONS / hereby certify- that 11113 plan, Sloccif cation, or report Was prepared by me or under my direct Super/Minn and that 1 am a duly 'Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. WAYNE T. SICORA REGISTRATION NO- DATE. 42676 11113 ! 2006 elms rteaN COaWaUESUS. NC JOB NUMBER HISTORY SHEET NUMBER CO DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER DATE 1541-ACE2 11 1131 2006 J " \ \ \��\ \ \ > " \ ��s \ ��:r \�� v V" " fir?P-��is`,,e" .��. --r-1 I T--I  I�� I I I I I I I I I I I ����= ��-***--.. / / 1 rTi / %1 / j / / Lc 1/.L L 1 1 L r ��! l-1 r t./ - ; / Y " /rJ // C / P�� ��, ��T I. > / / 1<��---4 Lr7S t / // ��  r / / / / /- �� -/ /-/ 11 11 --1 G 1/ // \.. % t 1/ l , - - 1 1 HEAW DUTY / _Nw`  -./ / PAVEMENT / / / / /- 1 ! 20.0' /' /l 1/ / l i l / /1 ' . / / / 1��\ '%. - l l l ") I �� _. ��'  r. s. I / i /1 i J l l �� l 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 ! l 1 1 j.-�� 1 / 1 1 ,1 BITUMINOUS 1 /! 11 / /1 /r `/11 j / l /1 1!/ / 1 , / / / r. Y / / / ! / / / / / / / // / / / 1/ I I / " / / / / / / / 1 1 i 1 / 1 5.A' DRAINAGE & UTILITY / EASEMEN1 _ / :T S" L \1: i aa�� ` \ / n66 \ 0' ' ' '����` /,;'�� I i I 1E1-- 47.9' HicHwaY s 48.1' I APPROXIMATE FUTURE MNOOT ROW 1 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ,,, . _ __... i " t: a k' SITE DATA: PROPOSED BLOCK 2, LOT 2 AREA 1.18 ACRES PERVIOUS AREA. 0.61 ACRES(52R) IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0..57 ACRES(48%) PARKING REQUIRED PER PUD: 33 STALLS O 5.4/1000 PARKING PROVIOEO 33 STALLS O 5.6/1000 ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SITE NOTES: ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES. REFER TO CIVIL DETAIL FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE OF BUILDING FACE (TYP.) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS WM' UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. LEGEND t- r 4i' ��Yti �� ir'" j {'S: SIGN LEGEND CYAN' BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. SO South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55401.2012 612492-4000 tel 612.492.3000 fax WWW. RYANCUM PANT ES.COM HiOIECTKWE MEDINA RETAIL CLYDESDALE MARKETPLACE LOT 2 BI,OCK 2 LOCATION MEDINA MINNESOTA PROPOSED CURB SHEETTITLE EXISTING CURB SITE PLAN PROPOSED BITUMINOUS CURB BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING LOT LINE REVISIONS PROPOSED LOT LINE MnDOT ROW Z EXISTING DRAINAGE/UTILITY EASEMENT O PROPOSED DRAINAGE/UTILITY EASEMENT 1 EXISTING RETAINING WALL U EXISTING TRAIL CONCRETE PAVED AREA HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVING tQ'  STOP SIGN Q'2  DO NOT ENTER 0 BEGIN ONE WAY Q - SEE SHEET C5 \ \ 42 82' >ohow O1 BEGIN WAY 0 N 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Exensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 61 AYNWSICORA REGISTRATION NO. DATE. 42676 11/ 13 / 2006 O2045 KIWI COWAN/ES Iia. sic JOB NUMBER HISTORY SHEET NUMBER C1 DRAWN BY CAB JOB NUMBER 1541-ACE2 CHECKED BY WTS DATE i' 11/13' 9002/ttf tt ]lV0 A00Sa>3t1> 23Jtl 145t nownN 6o( 8V8 AZNMVaO aaav:nn 3 Aa01311-ialaNnN nor 900LM 8d. 9[9Zv 3188 'ONNo11V11158801 V808I5 11H8VM vuBV 3o mm8 883o sm81 aye 8888 188813881eu8ss888d p>swvl .(88, a nm 1Ivyo put umsi.mdns many m81888830 LO pnuimd sv.n vedv rz>p:e vo ualugd 883.81 A3ma3 i9amq [ O0 z 1 in -T1 O c A C n 0 Z NV ICI 'IO2LLNOO NOISOiIH QNV ONIQV2IN 31111199115 VIOSHNNIDII V NIQHINi NOII.V>Ol Z NDO'IfI Z .101 39V1d13N2lt/W 31VOS3aA1a lidl32! VNIa31A1 3'Me/Jatou NO3'5i1NVJIVOJNV.IN A1Y8M xvl 000E-26o-Z19 In 000610 Z19 Z81Z4oYE5 NVi "Irodeamyly 00t 88,8.8.8,5 e9 'DNE SAE NI WOJ N'VAN Sd1HSN011V138 91L1SV1 914101109 ABM -� 11- 1-1-11_-111—. -. 30Y3813S 1NV1S1538 d115 /Id 31VId 13915 1=111 -11V130 JNISS0210 3OVNIV21135i1VM341S 1333 NI 37NOS ���✓ 04 OZ 0 N011M803N1 3dld ONV NOI1V8313 '3Z2S 380100815 LO3 NVId 83183S YIdO1S Ol 8338 'S1 03183181 Nnvap Ap 031311N301 SV NOHVN.88W0038 1V01NH031030 O1 383HOV 01 9N10V80 Zl -a311n9 ONV anO 2130N0 3SV8 31V932100V S SS809 S111081 Y 30 IYn'NINIW V 11V1SNl '0t 038M038 38V 51N3W15nrov 01313 31 18311888V 1'JV1NOO '30888880 3n111S0d 301808d L18I1881 53dOlS 8801Nn MOONS 111181 alun9 ONtl 8800 ONV S1N31838Vd 'N01100815N09 803 3181$N9dS38 SI 8010881800 Gl -0381n038 38V SNVId ON10880 01 spol15nrov 01313 dl 10311 38V L041809 9V38V 838101 NI ONIONOd 183838d ONV 88818 0B 8083 AVAIV 30VNIVLO 38185081 301808d 1-1918181 'S38101S 'N82llNn R MOONS 301808d 01 338,3803 ONn0a9 03HSIN8 3H1 9NIdOlS OW 0810080 LO3 3181SNOdS38 SI 8010881800 11 "31110380S 3annna15 ONV 0811580 ONV 3808:V8313 ONV 10WV1 301A835 N8:88 830/81 NIVW 838135 ALv11NVS 803 NVtd .801110 01 83..138 '01 SN01133S 1N3W38Vd SOONIWnllp 30 S1118I1 ONV N011V001 803 Slltlp.0 N01133S 1831838Vd ONtl N8818 3115 3811 01 08188338 AB 0388483/30 38 111.0eS SV32.1V AV/838180 ONV 101 ON818Vd 381 SONIMV80 1V8010311H08V 3H1 01 ONt883338 AO 0383883130 38 11VH5 5V38V OVcI *mows 'N01188113 30Va90ns NVId, 01 030V80 08138 SV38V TV N! 11n538 IIVHS SNOI1883d0 ONIOV80 311S 30 N011318800 6 -311S N0838813800 31-11 330 03S0dS10 38 IIVHS GMI 8010V8180D 3H1 30 8183d08d 3H1 3810038 IIVHS S1V1831V81 330V1SN0 831410 OW 'S18311 .88810 03NOONVOV ANV 'SI8311 31380N00 'OMOViBnS S00818088-808318z1 SS3083 11V B '35vean5 2103 A0V38 133L1S 3AV31 'NOI13/8313 3awnen5 01 30V30 818008 IIVHS 80108,81800 .S308,80 031-ISIN13 38V NAl0H5 530V80 L S183 8911V a3/n3S 1.8301S 03S0d08d M01103 01 531i08381 30VNIV80 3188V083 11VH5 8010V81N00 '9 1081803 14011838 ONV W18028108 11V 803 3191580d538 38 IIVHS 8010V231800 'S 183838Vd 981IIS183 281 30 08188883080 0108V 01 Al1dI808d 0318380V8 38 IIVHS NO8V88083 3H1 1N3i138Vd ONI15!83 01 11,1338,1'0V 18,1831V8 39Vdan5 /UN 0810Vld I43HAl "S3d015 d331S 80 308,d33S 831V[A 01 3n0 SW3180881 Alil!BV1S ANV 135330 d1381 01 NOIIVAY0X3 8313V A1388038811 03111380VA 38 IIVHS NO8VAVj%3 30va98ns "b 8019V8iN00 88 03103810 SN011V301 lV "tll3 aennwa0 ONV 110Sd01 311d8001S 8V18318W 318'01588 83880 ONV 1V1831VW 01NV980 .S18830 '1105301 30 NO11330X3 8111/8 311S 3H1 NO 03831800083 110S 11V 30 1SISN00 11VH5 1V1831V18 SNIOV80 reviln5 't 'SNOOVILVA 80 53I0NV81380310 ANV 30 833NION3 103(08d 381 A3110N d131V1031Y81 IIVHS 80108,81808 381 '0810880 311S 30 18V1S 01 8018d S3801V33 01881V800d01 ONY S3181110 9NI1SIX3 30 5808V/013 ONV SN0118001 381 83833A 01313 IIVHS 80104814109 7 -9911-ZSZ-008-1 :33E32-1101 80 Z000-086-lS9 8V38V 0813W S31119 NI81 7r:0117001 Allllln 803 'N0110na15N00 /0011VAV0X3 01 NONd 5340 9N0430M OMl NIH104 7140 3140 31410 831300. 10ViNOJ 11V3IS 8010V,N13100 'I S310N ONICIV210 80803108d 13181 NISVO HOIVO 30813.1 Ills 1081800 NOIS083 13NNV83 1081.800 NOIS083 30W81N3 N0110081SNO0 N008 311i N8g80 11801S S310830 83M3S W801S S3108130 83/31OHNV8 W8015 ON8S1%3 80/31OHNVvi W8018 03S0d08d e N01188A313 10dS 03808108d sots 38V80 30 1N3383d zot 1N3813SV3 A11818/30VNIV80 03S08102:81 - - - 1N3W3SY3 313410/394N1480 9NNSIX3 - anO1N0o NONIN 03503083 — — —866— -- Nno.0 00 BONW 03S03083 —a 6-- 8001N00 08115183 --- 1 --- - aN3031 bM1-10114 ,---._- 900L1[II IL Z3Otl9VSt 111/p Yd84VnN80f srm evo All QEgJ]HO AG NA1Vella 90 81e1Vn nr39HS Aa0151116aGivnN not � 900E/[L 144 9[92a ouryy3o mng 11110 9vo1 ,spun sannEug 0uonz.)md psu»rf g 1purcpe,lp 1 - f 1 punsoo m pestdesd Jen r.o ads us& sup „try 1 se Iep's, SNOISIti1N SZIVf,t{Q A.1,1111.0 SIll1ll11IS V:IOSHNNIhi VNICI814 NOI1VJol Z XDOI4 Z 30V1d13N2:1VIN 31VOS30A13 1IV13N VNI431A1 exvenaloaa Iv0 siHNva1GO9Nvna'.aMAS ,A1000f16tr219 1610001,-Z61-Z19 2102'COKS NIV "9odu>vmlV O01'6116Ey4ni15 4121 rpn^S OS 'DNI `sn 531NVdh0J NVAN SdIHSNO11V33e1 ON1 LSV3 ONIOl1 e "Intl 2o-0Mf "et '1 IOS3Nf I1N tl.1101N ' "_"--"' d.0 c nu b0 —/ eD�' 0 3 , 6032 Nl 0 ,.r,,. I o,a02rg --1 sesses -0 rSe.Y13 (rr 1-0 SSV10 se ge �ei LLSsv1o":" ,r, ,ay /s m✓ ',o-NvS V10S3NNIN 'VN1031/1 --- 3101AVR SACS Ativisid, 1 Y vi vk1 I NO3 ONUS," lH9LLu31VM V'azi O J` ST6IId tiv„rvvfi oauwo9� re / a,z 1 e/s e .z 310111.1tlW 1H01113 !WA DreISN3333 El 00 dpt "Id 0o wwq Fir -,}7 -' I J .a v 2/1, a1 . v. npapuy S133O Ifs .ONq S` I I 1 096 -CM V.LOS3NN n VN.O. w Sdrd 5 9 f V 1 so acoe° r' sT 32 a nN. s:. SIOS 11006 NI 9m003p a 1.1011VC n03 3d1a I S'IIOS 0000 NI ON100313 A N01 VOE,n01 Sad T-IP,1dGrS.h V.I0S3NNIN VNI034Y sc 3 —i 1 _ss CeiCINVIS 9N1S/J xPI6ti3 Ol SwisSs I S 0!ei Lti.Tre' FFOA n1Cf AS 30 3,6 ;m Serro,1 mm1s OA'S teelSrm6, Z JO NOOT SY. 310, WnpJgloss M S°NI 60136 A016,61106 iYtlnO Vl3M Z, I t 211n1rA131YIIOnnOSSY 01 RCN 0 0 0 ION sem, 1s a0 e 9x114'ItlY ?SSA 0.,1 110, Ca/ snu-vnnw F-z,91-b Erwin, v yr r0uaz 6(61ti O - _ss 6[6L, -O - rZ Om, Ntl 3JYd SNo 3LG( ✓lOS3fNIN VNI(D1" _^'^ .3a roal xnV'v"r� �e Jl.-----_SI 1laT" —M 1S ) O°'N"1Oa IV, ye ovN 10.. " o,ro,.„ se .,.,w. ,rol On.< o.,.... r, 0e ,o -lo= .1S) spok, . r a Air Jr, ee..x .=Waletoe �-N105tlN>IrN! JNISN �.^^"^+"^�+� S 0 so .v 9X4 V� _� scos errSf _�a"TaV;rN IT du+l'-+uu0� jI S0 ==s c ::do Ass ;co ss z f9� nee OSS.In .nsy eases., so rase ssisiss l TG... Thr V1CSe NN A bN10 N 21r d v 0 oC.GurS 1 _• • nni-inS 310U 16 e.1 i01 Jeer ) ( 1 v ;I > 1 IIaPoaYf r�" m'Y"t' 2 /IOS3NNIVN VU031' Sn b Wrin S 9Nl 900Zlellu z300401. Jlva aamVnN sot S1M OV3 AOolg93HJ AONMevaO 53 a3OwnNllHxs ANOISIII vasvi IN GO( VIVO ro.\! 0.011VY1SIDEIN uaggJO DIOS 01p1030E1 sp'trio n1911irsosssitici a t0 (Ins cvcl itio pun uoreredaelasmop era al Lq pnycleld y000010 Oo ..o I ueds10era. VAG]a] 0.1030[ NOI1Dr1b1SNOD z O O SNOIS1A:N S"ll V.L1Q '3.LIS 31.111.1313113 Vd,OSJNNITN VNIC IIN NOIIVJO"I c >D IfI c 301d1d13>i2Jt/W 31VOS30A-10 11V1321 VNI031A1 3mxlnfona IVO'J-S31NVAIWODN VAN-90-90\ '9 0000Z6VZt9 P19WrZ0019 ZIOP30o5S N4V',1I01n=mn tV OOV aanS €030S 410a110005 OS 'DM 'Sri SatNW WOO, NVAN SdIHSN0110l321 91•1115V1 9N1011/12 IMAM 33YDS 01 ION 1 0 V I liV1S ONIN Vd dVOIONVH (du) unvm 99 ,.� b5 09000,5 avrs e3311 DOS ONv 00119001 013 U0 90n 109093 —Nouv301ar.va 19903 1N3W3AVd Alna AAV3H F01100100 303300 n 330 pact 3315 100/NX INYld 031311a33 '359003 3599 Ire . /r-L art l On33 030 100/00_ 0933 030010-30003 010193x Aro .00 30990 l S 3 11J31,17AVd Alna 1VWaON mOu09- W3 3391305 34.3r Oat] 100/49 1Nvla 03r3Un30 sOna0 309 1193ds .9 33eS IOC/Nn IRE ea 03i3:1n30']SUW3 011 W311 110 .L/r-r .01010 Ofe!S!xU. 30.811110 S310N DOld ss3v0 IMnNva X.1.99 ryeq VlOS N II -I 'V\la VI• �f91P419 9N W.NXUV J'S 9,99a999. ONV 1101d 300 J'i a105091 r ILVOTJYv I oousa<tOO�i 31gs 0110 11v3S 01 ION 3/\ .lO >I1VM3GIS L0 V3LV LOB ONI>HVd NI NOIS 3dVOSONV-1 NI NOIS I-- T I OnuV03 0003-01-" N330 3md 0321NO3v9- 303O18 5 IN3n3,V31 Nnv3 INrr 089003.0100 30 atlI 000 ao1 ONran 111343 0080 x rne5-Wx N (mIMo AO n0103) min:v< 031331S 'AIVO Vp,9 deo 3da carro ,33,s �nsy, sne 9000 n03 3 33 s dis e anrdvd34 r05 roa axv or, 00 avaranvers el0113,1 / site 011111080113 VIO Vs eod S3W3 03JV915 nviIr3.Wryl (A) Rum 3090) 0,009 303093193 3n33)S 00m 13310Ua rM 39313 N95 ICOD 0001 nld 33331S Sara OSZrnvnld9 0101.001 incaro3 30390 WI" enviel0S nr 95aV -303SONn err 30003 31330003 N 0101 vas site 0Nrtl010NV 00 .9/C sor sits 0339aS UVl 000 (0 NIM 308310 33.093 .0 0303133 3933tt 3138300 or ,Ta 390 REIN ,ra axms 1331s ,m '113111e 1093 1053 51131S -0N-2 3009 0114011.3301 avogvu er ors edo,eve a es oNgnter 'ins 3r,3YNl-� ��INVA� lqs 0310.313S HIM 0003-, 0/0 of /1-0- eana snonllwnlle to s0,,Vs0 0d!d io 31VO of 9 i/I S 3 0F'IUtl3N 5n0 L - j 0I 33xv1S!0 t...__- 3a>Poosry l 4 a • 11 ] 0 (1.1e6 r mualnr¢ /y / / 3t/00 01 1v aad Z TWOS 01 10N NOIS NVA ONV NOIS dVOIONVH NOIS dIOISS303V v9-(a N9s N011V101A 80J 31,111 00ZS 01 an 0 2111103a 01 3101H3A ONIHa Vd °S) t 30 n ,3 mIs 0m m lv3IUM 9u , :COS OnoVJS 3J003 ONOOa9nsve 3m0 NO '.corns 310 3110'. - n30300 ONv 04303 0300 V9-L23 NOI$ • NOI1V101A 80J J 00JS 01 an 03a1,1038 _ 01 313IH3A D iaq- o Dail P S3S1NIl J- V ICt �/ ie� C -11 clam 1 nines', omnoa 90300300 v o — s1V1� ,,T(F3' 9°°°"Fr 0-17so S310n n...leeo leo, :7: Mr, V o NI z !N C iVv ) 1j,3e,w Y �yl -i9NV.WV I ON ro e a 5 is °,0 DIG non 3198 100,0 U190 1000. 9e 30wn __.__;o'�. __ r,I „tmt, .• • 1 01 ION 1IV130 >11VM301S lVdid, L 30V00a3 a0093d3 'oinvanJ9 ala 1uer30'S-)3 , (No-mm/4s eon 08004O3 oNraN 2119991.111% _ SV aXCLIOaS In3nlerer 1N33va39nS3x00s>aNOna 0 U39%9UIIM 'FtV3x.3 Or/3139990033M 3+uv1N3s3na3n inOr .'ou>druNOa "1v903 (13+0nmv no 0MS 00 S183301138 1331.1N'A '(wens ri)Jva F05Nvax3 3an13re O1 lxgr NONNY113 3003 %V10.09 1903 1e10r n'05F'VJx3 2/1 -- l0 (.)aa� N nc Intl d-pmc r, I( --- mil rrij Tij,1?-nijij i5 II 9>r�� L lij III I1 D :\l uvu+rl� I 99.941.1 Po3a9 ar900 90 r 00.00,0 12; 1. 3 n ( `c? 19, ayG• V AO rflaiV VA dl "0-a+, d u mWitt 1 ',trio -trots R9133 I� o 0011[9000F _3 r• •e.-c 401,035 / ora - 17 NV if 900Z/EL/Lt L3Jnesi, ana N304VnN 001 SIM 8VD AO 01H>3HD A9 NAlVN(1 Nv8wnN19a HS Aa01sM n381ent4 nor 9<9Z> OM NOIIYN15193N V8031913NAV uugv to mmS atp jo sme/ mluapon, plug icomssnold pavar! .<Inp eaa I amp poe uomi..ndov nvip mu nn vi Sy pmedmd vnn u063 10 'tronl dsa io9uods •uqd mp imii jrya)nynal[ n z O O -I T 73 O c C n 0 z SNOISIANN NVZd 213/AHS J U(11LS :n.1u 1NLIS V.LOS7 INFIN N011Onl Z >DERR Z d.01 3OV1d13>121VIN 31VCIS3CIA10 11V1321 VNIa3W 310NllilNtld 14203iiINYA4 ODNVANANak 'al 000[166- t9 P� 0001-ZWZ19 ZIOZY0495 NIV'•'ladonnoyp oof Duns %Dazes tpua.L OMOS OS DNI'Sn SHINV{MOD \NAN SelIHSNOI1V1311 9NLLSV19N101108 .NtlA A I v \ ; ..'- L 1333 Ni TWOS Ots OZ 0 'S3Vavdri09 AU'IHO liv film MOM 31VN108003 11VHS 21013V81NO3 1VU3N30 1N31518Vd30 9N1011nf1 5,1•110 3H1 W083 Silrind `JNlenmd oNv N31VM '83M3S 31VI0d08ddV 3141 DNINIV100 NO3 31e1SNOd530 32 TOM dOIDV81N00 1VM-30-51H018 Orland NIH11M 03131dnOD NUOM 11V 3,183580 LSniN SU0133dSNl 3iv15/AHD AVM 30 !HOW 3H1 NI1,111M ONIN80M 30 33NVA0V NI S21(10H 84 100NN ONV VN103Y1 30 ALIJ 3111 A3110N 11VHS 8019V81NOD '99t 1-ZSZ-009-t 3383-1101 80 Z000->51,-159 V3NV 08I341 S31113 NIM1 "SNOI1V001 AllIIID 803 NOLID081SNOVN011VAVDX3 01 8018d SAVO °WINO/A 0411 N11,111/A ,ilV 3N0 31V1S 83Rd00, 1311NO3 IIVHS 8010V211NO3 'S30VNO IVNIJ Ha1Vli 01 SONIISVO 11V ISnrOv 01313 1333 33E041 63430 3H1 NI 801308d ONVONVIS %OM ONV 3DvAnS ONnOu0 301 30 1333 33211,11 NIHllM 01 3NOZ 3d1d 3H1 Y1083 (66-1 01HSVV NO 9C B690 N1SV) A115N30 A8O nnnl%VYI 801008d 01.3VONV1S ZS6 01 0313Vdn00 30 11VHS S3119N301 until) 'S1N3113HI1038 11183d 9NI0llne ONV SNO11V313133dS VNI03n 10 A113 1441 H11M 33NV08033V NI 031480383d 38 livHS NHOM ...man TN SNORO3NN03 331A83S ON113I181SNOD 01 8018d Y131SAS 3dld DNI01100 31-11 30 SN011VA313 ONV SN011vDol 3H1 A4183A 11VHS N013V81N0 A11len 3H1 A 131V1031vWi N3NM0 3H1 01 031U0d38 3E3 IIVHS SNOIHONO3 01313 ONV SNVId N33AL3a AONVd31:13SIO ANV NMOHS ION UO WOWS .S183ANI ONV SNOI1V301 Alllfln ONIISIX3 llv A11N3A 01313 11VHS HOlOV81NO3 3141 040113181SNO3 Ol UOlad S310N l.lnum 3dIdONviS ONI.LS133 . Nlvnaltvm 03S0d08d , —H t NNYiU31VM ONIISIX3--"-----s. 3111NIVN0 WU015 0390d0Hci N3M3S V1801S 03S0d021d --M—« U3m35 VY8015 ON115133 U3M3S A8v11Nv5 0350dONd 83M3S ANVilNVS 91,1115133 ON3031 3111NI♦rNI 9S"486=(M)31 SL 496=n18 <90t-8 9-Hna3- 3dld 30 ON3 dV3 ONV 36d ONV1S -'%3 3A0n98 =-bM � H 31b1S N 0S'486=31 fl01S V181S Z44'0 D S l3 dJ21 .Z 1 3l£ t Ys a\96-(S)31 ” 4N6=(M)31 90"6Ha IVIH Z'rt4� -HIV83 dJN 00 t66=Bdi S 000'9 11V1321 S,10 dO8 LQ LB6'(M)31 L6T96=(3)31 L8'5786=(N)31 057.86=Y118 L90f-8 S-HYIO3 v SET96=nW _ H LZt 0 ® S 13' -d3U .SI 419Z A P fi Z6Z96=(S)31 fl LIT86=(3)31 6 46 C96-0.031 0 -OL'686=AUN L90t-N Z-Hvla3 ZOO I P. S, (0 —d3N „SI 311£ �� 'L44`0-0 9 13 / dad „ZI J18-./ I/ 16"Z96=31 —9 en1S 1,I815 L8786-(M)3I 1 / / 09Z86-0)31 OTZ96,(N)31 .X3 l 00'066=Yi1N <90t-8 d98 „SI ONIISIX3 Ol ▪ / t-Hn03 133NNOD 900Z/Etti.l. 230V-LOSI 81V0 tlaBWIN 90f SUM 8VD PPINDPHO PEINAVOICI SItIPPINI,33HS ummoof , 9002/Ct Itt 949P, 5 1333 NI TWOS altell OP: NOILVNISIOttli V110319/13NAVM tIOSIMAIIN 0,CIS IJ0 5,11 ntp,ptin tp.putIkta tint, e me r inn pm: uoisr.uadns untrp int npun antAl ppm-I'M** pod. to tuontagoAck ttirpf sup mil .ijniADA/platt SNOISWIP NVId NIVMELLVA1 WilAVEIS KUV.LINVS 0.1.11.1.93H5 VIC)Sat\INIJAI NOILVD01 Z 10'1 30Vid_ONtIVIAI 31VCIS34A10 11V1321 VNIC131A1 siftwifou IV0YS3INY.litiODN*UPAAMA\ n* 000C-26**19 Pt 000016A-Z19 ZIOZ-COPSS '*Intinatnitll OOP *MS PnnttS titnni tlInOES OS 'DM 'SR Sal NEV(IWOD ArVA.11 S3110/.31'103 <111118 TIV REIM 1180,1A 30/N108000 11VHS 8010W:11803 **13830 1831/118Vd30 9N101188 S.1110 3H1 V1083 S111583/1 ON18110 d ONV 831VM '83M3S 31V18d08c1c1V 3111 ONINIV180 803 3181SNO8S38 38 111M 8013V81N00 'AVM-JO-S1H018 3118/1d N1H1PA 03131&100 P1HOM 11V 3A83S80 isnvi 5E10103dSNI 31V1S/1.113 'AVM 30 11:018 3H1 N11-111M ONIAdOM 30 33NVAGV NI S8801.1 94 100NN /INV VNIO3Pi 40 /410 3H1 AdllON 11VHS 6013V81NO3 '99 t t-ZSZ-009-1 -338J-110/ 80 Z000-APVAtS9 :V38V 0813Y1 531110 NMI 'SN0I1V001 A111118 803 N01101181SN00/NOLLVAVOX3 0/ 8018d SAVO ONI>180/.1 0/A1 NIHilin ,TIV3 3N0 31V1S 83/1d00, 10V1NO3 11VHS 8013V81NO3 *30V210 1VNIJ 110.**1 01 SONI1SV3 *IV 1SOPCIV 0131J VN103r1 20 <113 3111 AO N01103dSNI S3818038 831VM ONV 83M3S *N1INVS ONI1SIX3 3H1 01 NOI/03NN00 1333 332181 83.3d8 31.11 NI U01308d ONVONVLS ZOOt ONV 30V388S 0/111080 381 d0 1331 33881 N1KPM 01 3NOZ .71dId 31-11 WOW (65-1 0/HSW 80 9P9690 illSV) AlISN30 A80 Vi/MIXVIN 801008d CP/VONViS (ZS6 01 0313VeIVI03 11VHS S31-13N381 <1.11118 SON*/ 1N3511S0POV S 30 iN8VIIXV0' V ONV 30 WIWONIII V 3AVH lAVHS STIOHNVt1 0310N 3S1M83/-110 SST1N8 9[40 PI1SV HU/A 33NV08000V NI 313210800 033H0JNI38 1SV3388 83111NVI0 U d/10.1 38 *NHS S31OHNVW 831410 3ONV1d333V A110 804 03033N 580110:W581 ALIO 03818038 ANV 31VNI08000 ONV 1N3N18Vd30 ON1833/119N3 A310 HUM N01133NN03 40 3dA1 18.3183A TIVF4S 8010‘181800 31-11 51NT/1381003N MID 01 38010881S 81Vd38 ONV 'ONIN3d0 35013 01 3318 aNnouv 'nob° '3ZIS 3d1d 3H1 01 1V001 DNIN3d0 NV 10881SN00 *38010/1815 >13188 80 N0018 31383800 210.1 '1Vf103 03A08ddV 1110 80 .,1V3S-N-80\1„ 38 **HS S38010/181S A111118 ON1S1X3 01 SW011338800 3c118 "IIV 'S9NI8 1N3111SIVOV 80081 JO YOPYI1XVIN V ONV On* JO P1/11NINPI V 3AVI1 11VHS STIOHNV{N 83/A3S A8V1INVS :811V3H JO 1N3P118Vd30 V10S3NNIN 3H1 30 SIN3/13818038 3141 ONV 1S93 VIPIAV H11/.1 30NVON003V NI 03HS/113 ONV 031033/PS10 38 11VHS NIVY1831VM 03131d/700 31-11 331N-13S NI 033Vld 08138 180330 'n'1PV/IttO VMMV/1SNV 01 ONIP80.3N00 SNOISIA08d <11/01080800 ONV 0090 V/AMV 1-1111A 33NV08030V NI ONV 83A00 .g* 30 V 1-111/A 0311V1SNI 38 11VHS N1VP0331VM 11V 'OM VO3Y1 HO 081)1008 N0110V38 31380800 H11/A 0301A08d 3E3 11VHS SiNIOd 1888/11 83810 ONV SON30 .S331 t0/11d 11V 6050 VMMV JO S1N31,138111038 381 ONI133W 1V3S 1/43111S321 HUM :kJ/LI 3510 31DN1S 30 11VHS S3A1VA 31V0 *N10311 30 1.110 381 31-11 AIM ONIAldriCta 1V1103 03A083dV dO 00 snoulivm <8 03annvinwvvi SV 833Vd 3H1 38 11VHS SINV801„H .S1N83)‘1381803d 111.183d oftoline ONV SN011V013103dS VN10354 30 A.110 31-11 HlIM 308V:3800DV NI 031.4803U3d 38 TIVFIS >180M <1111111 TIV SN01133NN00 301A83S ON1101181SNO0 SdIHSNOI1V138 ONI15V1 ON/011119 01 8018d Vi31SAS 3cIld 0810118E3 381 JO SNOUVA313 ONV SNO11V001 3H1,\*83A TIVHS 8013V81N00 Ainan 381 .1111Ati '<131V10351Y0 83NA10 3H1 01 03180d38 38 11VHS SW01110800 01314 ONV SNVIci N33/.1138 AONVd380810 <NV NMOHS 10N U0 NMOHS "S.1213ANI ONV SNOI1V001 unan 9NUSIX3 11V <3183A 0131J TIVHS 8013PAJ1N00 381 '80110/181SN00 01 8018d S310N ' • • 8 \ \ ,„ \ • ••/' „•••,••• \ ,;•,„ /83 GS Aviwiew aivis NO11038800 1d30 - OS*96=-31 anis NVS .9- %906 0 OAd ..9 ilgt ,„ , A• ,,, -,,, -,„ OS, ' \ .* 'Y \'•• •• , - , •vz I 26= Sr' „ S9 686t*N18 ' 8 .., •>.,. inomeno Nrvs ,,9 , , . . < ., Li AL*P6A(38)318, T.,.. ._ ... . .. , , .. NVS ..9 :31V1OSNI A 30NV8V3I0 1V3I183A • NIV1NIViN 01 S08185080 NIVIN831VM 11V 83M01 310N 8. 3dId 30 losino :uvroxotiddv 01 0380SV31,1 SNOLVA313 <13A110:13S38 3dtd JO iN01100 A 3dId JO d01 n dB A di - OZ-Z96,na 00096=d1 @ 90-696*(11 It*A86**13 ..„ @ _ 99C26=d8 99 196Atil @ - PC486=d8 f/.:186.-*11 @ - 19*96=d8 1.9086=d1 0 .03V1INVS ridalS 831VM ONIX :SONISS010 A11111.(1 3d1dONV1S 081181%3 NIV{1831VM 03S0d0Hd NIVI/i831VM ON11S1X3 3111NIV80 It/801S 03S0d0ild 83M3S V1801S 03S0d08d 83M3S 11801S ONI1SIX3 83/A3S lalINVS 0350d0ad 2.13M3S A8V1INVS 08119%3 CM3011 Emis NIVV0331VIA 0838 SA *1 881S NIVP/831VM1 -3Act „9 -0N38 .SA ..9 oiS 00 t66=3iti 35000* rolaa \ ' 1, V 3A1VA 31V0 , i /,1 7/ il ' ' -..- -- -- - ll..9 /1.1 iNVUO<Ft I , if 8 -0838 .S l t „9 RI 1 1 1 i i I A' / / 4 if / i C iii l ' i /,, / 't I i ill '. II- 1 / I // i1 I 8 1 I t f I---4 u I i // 11/.-- - / 111, 1 1 / 1 - % 1 d 1 'IVO/18:3A „t* N1V1NIVN t 13,31,11/1SNI V 30NV8V3110 -ht,.01 /0941831VM 83/A01 * / 6, , (--...g. . , ...,t, , , ,.. , , , , -,_. , , g PIM OAd ,9 * / unnom .9x..a ; / ' 9 ' , 1 Olt' rom3t.92o)(f / / / .4k, , , , Vr V3--,:i:.::_ . i izjS, c 31YOSNV 3ON10 -„, I, , 1VDt183A „AZ:7 NIVIti •, -01 NIVIN831V/Aftmoi „ / / 11-1- ---/ 7 rt _ /I3 1f/ e7:384 N3SZt1 tThAx. / _. / _ _ Cli4NN°a- N9 *-Oflr/A0Ad I J sana s 9 *1311213****IglyulY r • ›-„ : • •,•r• , • „ • , ✓ / / / , 7 \ ( -S-\\----- \ i\ \ 94 • \ +, , ,-;,;(„-- ,,-- 4,„- <-- \ \ \ ,..., 'f'--) / ' \ '07,1. s,"•::••.,;••,-/:•; ,-,1....,,•,,f,,,,,. \,,,,,,<-- - A \k, r", 900Z lCllll Z3aV-4161. 31Va tl39wnN 301. &VA lameI A9 4:133a3Ha A9 N41YNa Ii V 330VlnN.L33HS Mi0151H uaawr1N 3of 900ZItllll Ola5.1.1531HVd1100 nrxa sooe p 31Va 'ON NOILY915r.311 'nosouuryq f0 Wets oyl f0 amel asp sapun nauBua lnuassolosd pssuoorl Slnp a me I nyl pue uonwodns svnp ,Sw sapun 10 ow Sq puedwd sem pods: i0 uooengnads`ueld spgl Imp !gran .Sgaraq f 00 73 c 0 C n 0 z SNOISIA4N f Vir.1 J[\unioI'I iIS 31111133HS VILOSUNNIN VNIaarAI Novorpoi Z xao'i€I Z 1.01 33V1d13MVIN 31HaS3CIA13 11V1323 HNICI3 W 1A103.531NWNI07NV.S.W0VA n x".i 000C160119 N1 0004-Z66-ZI9 ZIOZ-40455 xw'silodeauulw ages 'lams ywal Limos OS -3N.L'sl1 s31NV4WOD NVAII SdIHSNO11V138 ON I1Sb-1 ONlalln9 .NVAti 1333 NI 31V0S 04 OZ 0 1H01311 32i11X13 llba3A0 ,9Z .S.Z ba IC004 Z2A171 — ONI111011 VINOH111 U.0 Z94 0004£ 310d aid 3af11X13 I 'ON00!1 Mgt 004 £ O8 111013H 321f1X13 11Va3n0 .9Z ,£Z 48 1R004 Z21VN — ONIIHJII VIN01-1111 Z4-0 Z94 0004£ N3V13 01 >IWO S3an1X13 Z 'ONnoa HON 004 Z O SVAVIHR11 N011'd001 Hl°JN31 310d S2138Wf1N 001V1V3/ 83ae110V3f1NtlU9 �,� 3JtlLltlM 321f11X13 SN3Wf11 S110A NpI1dRIpS3Q 32if11Xld JNI1H'Jf I J1111Ntlf1t9 3dAl 328f1iX13 3-ina3HoS aIn1X13 JNIIH911 _ — 1 _ `--., err_ ���—`-"r=.`.+_ \ \ ,.� �, >����—:- ..„ `l i ' ` / ! i f ./ I 7 > r .' 1 53afo. HL91131 310d i 3Sb8 31d13H 51100 80HONV 01,111N0014 3SV0 13NVd 01 AM OW 11nON00 5311 1VOLLa3A SM—(13) ,ZI S311 £# 30Va9 03HSINI3 a3n03 3SV8 '3SV8 01 030N1109 SONIHS0I3 9NION11080 KM 35V8 NI 11nON00 310H ONVH 310d ONI1H0I1 ..OS Oa 11'd130 14-1013 V32id 11b1321 -O ti'O ; f 1 I SS Atomnon4 � j bl s t I.'0 _ 3'Q L'0 l'(� „, J,` c / \ \ \ • \ Z'f // r-' —. _ ;— ` 1 11F i -7-- { 11 !1 ! 1 !` 'f���� 1 / /i 1 t r 1 I 1 ! l Jr Jr J 1 _-�_f�, , _ - .\ f 1! J 1 11 1 ! 1 t � i t J r r .. � r` 11 1 1 I1 !1 ,1 -T ---1 r r !J J! 1 y! 1 f 1--.1 1 r 1 1 f! 1 1 11 i--- 4._ 1 ! 1 ji ! 11 I 1 ! '-'. •-.. ;J 1J f 1 ! 1 J • ram.,, / f 1 1 /J r ` Ji 1f `-�1... 1! • r f J1 1 r 1 ! / 1 ! ! F f r' 1 I-} I 1.." r .��f , f , , !I 1 r i J � I -- ,���` 1 I { I ! !! J !! 1 4_ .1 ! r t / -- --i J J 7-'J 1r 1 1 ''� J -,1 t! f. . ti 1 %.- J ! 3 \ !1 f 1J r ~ �- !r 1 ! ,s If1 R 9002/(t/tt 31V0 Wad mm 3/0 23OV-14* 11301VpN 90( ms xe NAYS° Z1 1196kfIN133115 ANO12111ll90WON n01 vmmo mnt5 nql to emq =ip "pun mnym V adnspma pasmml .t1up o we I taq, pve vo s,"dos nanp Am upon :o=ni Sq pmvdmd sem »odv :o u nn goads'clgd snp rzyl.4mv 59=:'4I nZ OO Z� H O A0 c n 0 Z SNONIA30 S'II VELICI 9d VOSCI N V"1 VIOS NI NIN V[NIC [YN NOlmol Z )I;X)"[41 33Vid13MIAN 31VaS30A13 1IV1321 VNIa31111 1NIJ IU 0 K00.SNINVAN )NYAH'Y� \ n� 000E-26zt> 1=�000ez6o-Z19 2102-(01,55 NW'slodu>uum OOE °nn5'nang ipu=y W^os 05 '"uu1'sn s31Hvallo7N xu SdIH$N011V13a DNI1$Vl ONI(IlIn9 HrAII '30V63 3A08V A11H011S a0 13A31 8V1103 1008 3H1 KVA 031NV1d 38 01 S808e5 llV '3003 NOW NOISN3WI0 a3A0 33N303338d 331V1 01 038 NI 806HS 30 311I6311/30 30V80811S a3A03 000060 603 NVid 01 83338 ON1003 'O'A'd b 03dS 335 - 1105 ONI1NVld '03d5 33S - 31aeV3 3dV3SONV1 (3513183H10 0310N SS31116) NaVB 030036HS d330 .£ - Holm 30V6080S NO 115 01 SenaHS 300330 03NSINI3 3AOeV 1S(16 a0 lV 8V1103 1008 30V1d ONI131Vld Ol 6031d 310H 30 S301S ONV A01108 /.318VOS Cd31) 1VI631VA 03ZI213NIV1N00 30 S1008 N3S001 ONVH 310N MVO 1008 3H1 30 11101/3 3H1 301111 1SV31 lV 38 ism ONILNVId 803 310H 3H1 310N I=11111E111111E111111=111111_IIIIII.-111111-1111� _1111111 _(11. l�l — / 1=IIIlu 621P1 UM AAP (t74‘. f Hf12IHS los '30V80 3A08V 311H011S 60 13A31 8V1100 1008 3111 H1131 031NVld 38 01 S3381 11V 11V8 1008 3111 JO 13101M 3H1 33VA1 1SV31 1V 3e ism ONI1NVld 603 310H 3H1 310N 00S 31ONV 1V 13S 301V1S OOOM „VZ X „Z X „Z 3UVa0811S 110Sd01 '33dS 335 - 110S 31311NVld (3513183H10 0310N SS31N0) N6V8 03003811S d330 „ - H3inW 301,80805 NO 11S 01 11V81008 36131 aid 3N0 - ON1031313 11331V613 1SNI3 01 dVaM 3381 (3131 dV61S 30131 „Z/t-1 'lIW Ob) 3N31AH13310d 80 3N3lAd06311.10d „91 (3331) S1VA631N1.0Z1 ® .0 - 3211/1 'VO bl ONVH1S 318n00 30V80 03HSIN13 3A081' isnr a0 iv aVll00 1006 301I1d 33111NV1d Ol 6016d 310H 30 S3015 ONV A01108 3316VOS '00133d 331NV8V110 331 1nOHOnoa HL NO111SOd BWnld V NI S3361 3NINIVINIVW 603 31815NOdS36 SI 8010V611103 3H1 3.13A3MOH 'S3381 3NV1S 01 NOI1d0 5,6010V813100 3H1 SI 11 031Va1Sn-re 36V 3NNW'S 3361 30 SOOHI3111 31VN6311V 0M1 3LON dads SIIORGIOd0 'S1N3A363036 H1M080 IV16 VW Ntll NV 1 d O1 U SN0111 NO3 3115 133308J 3H1 Ol 31VIad0add V 31O3H3s ou 3 as N V I I NMVI ONIa31VM / V H1VA 63NM0 3H1 301/106d TIVHS 6010V611303 3dV3S0NV1 3H1 'S 11011VON003 33601318 oNain8V ONV ofinoaV 31133810 SV3aV 3S0111 ON10013N1 3163d0ad O31V0I2181 36V SONI1NVld 3dV3SONV1 03S0d06d ONV 00S 11V 1VH1 3ensie 01 A111181SNOdS3a S.6010V613100 3dV3SONV1 3141 38 TIVHS 11 '4 '03SOdo8d 38V S1N3W3A06d1.6 3.1VOSoNV1 M3N 383NM 88110 30 X318 ONV 331I1 3183doad N33M138 AVM 30 1H018 wend 3H1 30013N1 IIVHS N0111'01881 3H1 '0311/01661 %001 38 IIVHS NVId NO 031V310N1 SV31AV ONI1NVld ONV OOS 11V 0310N 3SIM63H10 5S313,10 '£ 3101/V301 W31SAS NOI1V01661 03S0d08d/ONLLSIX3 33183A 'Z '011133060 Ol 6016d 831010 3H1 38 03113V:38 38 IIVHS 353111 '03110018 N3H31 680M d0 3d09S 3111 30 16Vd SV NOI1V31313331S ONV NVId NOI1V31681 NV onaiva15nlil ONIMV80 dOHS V 03110V:Oad 80A 3181SNO61536 38 IIVHS 60131,61NO3 3dVOSONV1 't saIoN NOLLVOI nu 'a3NM0 3111 01 1S03 ON 1V SNOf1V83d0 031I1NVld NONA 3163d06d 01 30VWVO '11V HIVd36 '01 '00S 3A13336 01 0310N SV361, 350111 NV111 631310 31110V80 O1 3na 038an1510 SV38V 11V 0335 oNnoao 3H1 01 03NV1S 3e 11VHS OOS 3H1 'S31VMS 30VNIV60 NI 60 l:£ NVH1 83d331S S3dOlS NO '51NIOf 038300131S 3AVH 11VHS ONV sanoi Hoo 3H1 01 1311V8Vd 01V1 38 IIVHS 00S '313 'ean3 'eV1S 'llVai 30 NONVA313 33V360S Move 1 013H 38 11VIi5 033S/00S 30 30V60 03HSIN13 533Vdans 03AVd S1neV 033S/OOS 383HM '3331V1d333V 83NM0 01 8063d 03A01138 38 TON IIVHS HOIHM OV1 311SV1d V HUM (3831V-10313610N NI1V1 60 130W103) 03U1131301 316V313 38 IIVHS 3361 1,63A3 ONV 038 031I1NVld 413V3 NI 3Z1S ONtl 361A1 aid enaHS 3N0 'S11H130 ONUNVld aid SV 0311V1SNl 38 01 S1NVld 11V '0313110N 38 ism 13313106V 3dVOSONV1 3111 '0351A0V 38 iN3V115nf0V NV alnOHS '01313 NI 03033N 38 AVW S1VI631VW 1311Ild 03S0d06d JO NOI1V301 NI Si N3W1SnrOV 'b 31011V11V1SNl 01 8016d 13311H38V 3dV3SONV1 3H1 d0 NOLLN311V 3H1 01 S313N3131330 353131 3NI88 TIVHS A3H1 331NV6V00 a0 'IVAHHOS 3N3WHS118V1S3 1VI831VW 1NVld 103AV 313AI1V03N 11-191W HOiHM NOGION00 3115 63H10 ANV 60 'SNOI1101103 1105 'S310110313S 1NVld 31/1 NI S310N3131330 ANV S3A13383d 6013V81NO3 3dV3SONV1 3H1 31 '03110010 11V ONV ANV Ol 6016d 13311H3LIV 3dVOSONV1 3H1 38 03A0addV ONV 03313V:36 38 ism SNOUV301 1VIa31VN 1NVld 11V 7V36V 31V103WWI 3111 NI 03131d4103 N338 SVH N0113na1SN03 ONV 03110V60 leNn 0311V1SNl 38 01 011I1Ntl1d ON -1 SHION ONIZNVrld '0310N 3S1A1631410 SS31011 831881,8 033M 1VA 63913 63A0 1133nW 000MONVH 0300381-1S d0 2133V1 „£ V 3A13338 01 SONVISI 101 ON1N8Vd 11V 01 'NOSV3S 03/131060 15613 3H1 011I800 'A6V5S303N 31 360W 80 '31N33M 03831VM N3H1 38 11VHS ONI1NVld 11V 'NOI1VIlV1SNl 631AV 00163d 860H-4Z 1S813 3131 wane 331M1 03831VM AIHon0a0H1 38 TIVHS 1V1831VW 1NVld 11V 01 'V361, 3an1 1N30VfOV ANV ONV V38V Haw N3331138 033V1d 0311003 3AVH IIVHS S038 031I131VId SSVW 11V 'NOLL33S 100A OZ 6361 S3N1/15 80HONV 11,13111 (C) 3321H1 1111/3 ON1003 30V89 1V10213131w00 '3'A'd „V 38 IIVHS 0311003 ION1003 '6 'SONVAV80 31V3S TON 00 SNOISN3A10 031V1S 103dS38 'S310N 63A0 3331303036d 311V1 SNOLLV313133dS 151X3 S311LLNVn0 NI 5313NV61383S10 9 31003HOS 1NVld 83A0 30N303338d S33V1 NVId 'SNVId 3H1 NO NMOHS SV Al1n338V0 031V301 3e IIVHS S1NVld 03S0d08d ITV INVId 011I1NVld '0313133dS 3SIM83H10 5531Nn 30n6dS 1d33X3 'S3361 11V NO 30V:06d 1101133106d 1N3008 3-6 8313V ONIddVaM 11V 3A01136 ONV 1-Z1 01 6016d 31V3 3H1 NI O31NVld S33211 S601101330 11V dVLIM '350d611d SIHl 60A 033110V311NVW 83dVd 3d38a d00881631VM AAV311 Ainvno 38 I1VHS 1VI2131HW ONIddV2131 IONIddVNM 3381 11131806d V 38V SNOLLION ONVA a0 110 'WSIIVONVA HM 03 S a3 ATVONV 11 O8d0 NI SOONH 1NVld 3H1 30 ON3 3H1 lONn 36VS 30 1V NOI1103A3 senXV1 0 ONV 11S310d NV NI SenaHS ONV S3361 3H' Nro1NIVW 01 Aa ilaaooN d31S Aa3A3 3NV1 O1 A111181S 3>IV1S S8015V 1No3 H N0 NI V a 3 1 S 1 S 130 3H1 Ol O Oa000 S33a1 3H1 300 a0/ONV 3NV1S Ol 31111815NOdS36 S 3Va NO3 H IIVH I � NINtl ,a01 1 3 1 38 5 1 O 1S 3361 'ANn81 3361 H1113 13V1NO3 133810 NI 11310A ON RUM H3lnW OOOMONVH 030038HS d330 „4 3A13038 01 53381 S00001330 ONV N336063A3 11V '631881(8 033M 1VA 63013 ON H1V3 Hoenig 000M08VH 0300361-1S d330 .£ 3313336 01 S038 031I1NVld IVINN363d 11V '63186V8 033M 1VA 8381A 83A0 H1d30 „£ 01 S03e ONI1NVld 11V Holm SSVW 'SNVId 3dV3SONV1 3H1 NO 0313103d5 SV IlVI831VW HOlnry 3SI3163H10 0310N see1Nn 'SN0113081SN1 S,836013V3nNVW 3111 83d 1105 3NLLNVld 3H1 H11/3 NI 03XIIN 8331111833 0313133dS 831110 a0 1V3W 33108 133180 HltM NOI1V11V1SNl NOdn 0331111633 38 IIVHS S1VI631VW 1NVld 11V INOI1VZIllla3d '8313WVIO „£ NVHl 8308V1 SN308 ON10010NI SIa830 11V 3A06436 '51N3W0N3WV 301A06d ONV 53104-1 03,111NVld W063 031VAVOX3 110S 3Sn IllOS 11100V8 'NOIIVAI11110 8313V O31lddV 38 TIVHS S1N31NON319V '331 30 H1d30 normal V 01 031111 38 TIVHS S038 011I13/Vld SSVW 11V INOI1V8Vd38d 038 ONI1NVld '1 SNOLINDMIOddS ONLLNVId 01. 313N310 3H1 01 1500 1VN011.100V ON 1V 0301A08d 38 01 S1N31933V1d36 TIV H1131 33NV131333V 6331M0 d0 31V0 3H1 NOVA NV33 6VGN3IV3 3N0 H01108H1 1VI631101 1NVld M3N 331NV8100 IIVHS 8013V811100 '036301SN00 38 111M 30NV13333V 1V116Vd ON S1V1831VA 3dV3SONV1 71V 30 031I1NVld 30 NO113130100 3H1 831AV 10311HOXIV 3dVOSONV1 3H1 AB 3313V1d330V 30 31V0 3H1 NO N1038 IIVHS S1V18311,61 3dVOSONV1 a03 3INVL18VM '0: 'NOLL33dSNl 3ONV1d3331/ 83NM0 3H1 603 1S30038 N31118M V 301/106d IIVHS 8013V611103 '8010V/113100 3111 30 3111181SNOdS36 3H1 3e 11V1-15 3ONVid330V 63N330 01 8016d 60330 LVW H311131 33VWVO a0 WSIIVONVA 30 S13V ANV '33NV1d3DOV 63NlA0 30 3WLL 1113111 SIV1831VW 0311V1SNl 3I333N 11V 30 3331VN31NIVW ONI00-NO 801 31815NOdS38 51 6013V613103 'N3V1A835811N d0 NOLLV130SSV NV31639V 'N301S 363SanN 803 08VONV15 NVOIa3WV 3H1 30 NO11103 1531V1 3H1 HUM Ald1600 IIVHS 1VI631VW 1NVld 71V NO11V10no a0/aNV ale V 30 NOISSIWBns 3H1 01 6018d 8013V811303 3dV3SONV1 3H1 AB 10311HOaV 3vIVOSoNV1 3H1 30 031S30036 SI 1VA0661dV SS3lNn 031d330V 3e 1101 SNOI1n1115ens 1V1831VA 131Vld ON '03dV73108 ONV 03111e 36V SenaHS aNV s33a1 e8 's3H3NVa8 oneeene ao 03oVWV0 aNV OOOM OV30 3AOW3a 01 0311(1a3 ONV G33111833 38 01 NIVA36 01 83361 ONIISIX3 11V '1VA06138 01 6016d 13311H38V 3dVOSONV1 3H1 30 NOI131311V 3H1 01 1H013088 38 IIVHS TON a0 NIVA38 OInOHS avaa31VW 1NVld 83H131-IM ONI061,036 NOI1S300 ANV '03OV60 38 01 V3aV NV NI 38V 80/ONV 03A011136 38 01 0310N S5313111 03AVS ONV 03133108d 38 IIVHS A3H1 'TON a0 ONIh\V80 3H1 NO NMOHS 83H131-01 '311S NO 013003 331V S3NISSVW 938HS 1NV3U1NOIS 80/ONV 53361 031IISIX3 363HM '311S NO ONINNOM S8013V81003 213H10 HUM 5NOI1V11V1SNI 011I131Vld ONV N0113(161SN03 30 S3SVHd 3H1 31V61108003 b 'SNOI1V0011NV1d ONINVIS 01 6016d WOO-KV-109) 11V3 3N0 31V1S 8311d00 33,1I13V3 Ae ONV 8013Va1NO3 1V63N30 3H1 H1113 3163d06d NO SNOI1V301 ).imn lav AiNen O1 a013Va1NO3 30v0saNVI 't SHION 'IVZIHNH0 L 9a0/Cl/11 also wMd 003Y33x> Z3'JV-Lost 339anta 00( H111 AU Nmvua 4� e3elanal leans AN015nW317NON 00( IL4 m ISSzt 31101 ON NoftVe19Dau siugN Lo mn9 agrya smq aN npun Hsuss ' admrpori pamisml ,(lap s UM I mtp pne uomundaa lump Siu spun ;o mn.(q pumdmd sem 130dm 10 a0.+190ZdS'ngd vm Fey .(F oa Ig®auf N011Dna1SNOD Z O O SN0151A1tl NV'Id. AdVDSQ1NV1 311.11.639a5 ed.OS9NNII� VNICUII N011I]01 Z:OCT lZ1.0i 33111d13NUVW 31VCIS3CIA13 11V1321 1/N1a31N 3•19 isMoNd MOD" C'IINYd I\OJNV.Ill MAIM *e) 000Cz63-919 W� 0000 261Z19 ZIOZ-00159 NLV'11.11s 18!IV OGS'1m9•nmSry1ol Wa0905 'DNI`SO S31NV81903 NVdN SdIHSNO LVl3a ONI1SV1 9N101100 133i NI .i IOJS ofr OZ 8 JlV_O$ q41 Wn AVM b3 20 •6 J .1J.1. % 910 .8/ S-I 1l0H qV VIO .91/ Sl /M 10080 SN •1 NO 3191d 35918 .L ' ./. • .Z/ t nbuvA353iSn® IIVa m01 Ol 013N- SnmVa .1 Gana .9- d18 a9 s one0.9/ s .e 9- 91S0d 13319 OS .Z % .Z 150d NO dVJ 11v8 .Z x .2 l frA bisect 1dAl 3lrcf3d 39N3e& 'MAI SNOW'S .9 p lD 03d013n30 393M A3HL 31 S101100 11V 30 SJNUNVId 313131900 133133a 310031405 1NVld 3H1 NO 53LLLLNV00• 'NVId 3H1 NO NMOHS 531111NV00 /3183A 01 8010V91NO3• 30N31N3AN00 S,11010V81N09 3H1 a03 38V 311103HO5 ONLLNVId 3141 NI NMONS 53111INVO0• A1N3n3 3JVdS 'lV0 93d O JO .0-.Z 1NVld '1NOJ t %IW An -MVO SN80139 AddbH/V1131S 2868 Z9 SRYINtirad AlN3A3 30ed5 lve pod au s uowalltl oglo snwo3 VV0 �s -. 1013 .0-$ INVld '1N00 9 10Vd1400 $NVI1311V ft AlN3A3 30bdS 1V`J lauoglV 991,090. osea WO — '0'0 .9-.0 1NVld sum© 3SO8 13NV81b 5319VHO L1 A1N343 30VdS WO uoldwog0 0909 Oa 1310 ,9-,Z 1NVld '1N00 S 3508 NlVIdryVHO Il A1N3A3 35VdS '1V0 )adma !So ry• oomodof oaondS SOW ' 'S'0 .0-,f IN gmain© V3)9d5 13d8v0 010VW fZ A1N3A3 30VdS -lV0 plolVall M - 00 .0 .5 1NVld _ 1N00 S A5838831Nu� ZI sanims 6n041102a AlN3A3 30VdS -IVO aaap oa5. ssuawga swadune 695 sen.Y„ 'JO ,0-,S INVId 1505 5 a3dINOf N3350V35 Ll • Sa[RIDS NHdiNO 41'131S-LLInW dlYnlJ sw;au! '; n glob-sa sn6ao1o;0 o v as 30V90 01 1180 1103 EPP8 ,9 NuoulMva S531580131 b ®SOdOlid ► S8%N.L TILNX/lYNNO we0210 1153 ONb 'WORg6na, wryonysuuad snulnm3 tlSd a30tl31 1HO1tla15 8R8 .f HSV 3211d5 3191918d 1 �' NMOaJ 1103 ONV 'lV9 pvquow walLaf, aag z Fab‘? NEW 830V31 11-101V81S 8128 ,f 31dV111 320'10 NW01nV Z a8s0d0ad S MILL S110fIQl3Ra SN21tlW3N 1008 3ZIS 31,tlN NLLtlI/3WV1NOWW00 A10 3000 If It/TH Mg" ivalia0zHnaa ' HUHN 4Z 30 CZ 133HS NVId 33S 13S 1VilaanS 3NI366 V1 30 19Vd SV 0311ib1d 00S ♦r 31118 3I1V5 IV ON18dS ON8I01103 3F11 0311ddV 83ZI111.833 01-0-Ot. 'BnaHS 93d ZO 9 ONV 3391 30 S310111 83d11V0 5'Z 93d ZO Zl 10 319(8 V lb ONI1N9/1d 30 3111.1 31-i1 IV 0311dd91 930111193 8VIONV80 04-0-01. (S0801-1dS0Hd ON) 19M01103 SV 830111183 3413038 IIVHS SONLINVId 11V • i13NM0 3H1 Ol 1500 ON lV NOLLV9330 ONLINVld 3HL A8 03M/3 311S 3121 01 30VWV0 11V 819,839 IIVHS 9010V91NO0 3dV3SONV1 3H1 • 'N9V8 3H1 HIM HS013 ION '30018 N8V8 HJNV138 all 1V 03NONd 38 IIVHS S3HJNV9B '0318111d 38 01 38V S1NVld 31 • bl0 to ,f SONI8 Halm 3A13538 01 S030 ONIINV18 NI 10N S33211 11V • SONISSVW 830000011080 ONV 8naHS 11V 30 831311183d 3Hl ONOOab 03511 38 IIVHS 06/1003 30V210 1VIJ8311909 AAV3H • lIM0210 e3N1V1 NO0 321tl S1NVld 31 S1009 0611350 10J ONb SH3NIb1N00 3A011138 • -S1NVld 03ddb10108 ONV 0311918 803 11118 1008 3141 30 93OIS ONV 801 3H1 WOW dv1808 ONV S3d09 a0 3NIMI •ON18M 3A0W38 • 031V91991 38 01 SONV151 3dVOSONb1 ONV SV38V 03000S 11V • "Halnw 0001A0aVH 0300321HS 30 H1d30 .Y 3n13039 01 S3391 ONV 'Halna 000M05V91 03003aHS .f 3613038 01 SONVISI ONV 5038 Gnain lib • 'M31A38 50 10319radv 3dVOSONV1 31-I1 Ol NVId NOI1V0I981 30 ONUIVaO ("OHS V ialen5 IIVHS 801)V211N00 3dV0SONVI • 1080400 NOIS083 ONb S301010 2103 Nbld ONIOVaO 01 93338 • S1I91130 9N11NVld S310N NOI1b01981 'S3LON HNLLNVld 1Y83N30 803 133HS 11V130 3dVDSONVI 01 83338 • 1310N SS31N11 'SV321V 038901S10 11V 033S / 00S • sdiou aavasaxvn MI AVM 30 111919 SS AVMHOIH 100NY1 86 L6 HI bMH01H 31b1S SlB5230 33S OLL o / NYVM 313a0500' WOa313S'fi0 NIW t 39N33 1V1n•1lVNa0 S3381 08VA31n08 .9NLLSIx3 ('3S 005.9Z 1IV135 3N11-NI ) s 101 IN0018" 03016082 035100321 512/3W3a10035 3dYOSONV1 35 000'001 )3360 35 000a 25363 a03 S110383 "IVN011108b I• 3S 000'001 - 00005 a3A0 dS 000a A8363 50 S110383 W00111009' l• 3S 00005 - 000'0l 83A0 3S 0000 A83A3 803 S110393 1VN011100V Z• 3S 000101 01 do 3S 0000 A83A3 803 911090 t• -80032.13 33VJSUNV1 U3811103a mon ssuapiaambax Sdv0saxv I 3. 9. SOUTH ELEVATION 10. NORTH ELEVATION MEDINA OUTLOT CONCEPT DESIGN 10. NOVEMBER 13, 2006 21 EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION MATERIALS: 1. STUCCO ONE 2. STUCCO TWO 3. ALUMINUM TRELLIS FEATURE 4. ARCHITECTURAL LIGHT FIXTURE 5. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 6. MASONRY ONE 7. STUCCO CAP 8. STONE MATTERIAL 9. MASONRY TWO 10. GLAZING - SPANDREL AS TENANT ALTERNATE 11. FENCE TO MATCH MEDINA IN -LINE 12. DRIVE-THRU WINDOW SIZE TO BE DETERMINED. 12. SCALE: NTS 1541-002 60' - 0" �Z TENANT ONE TRIVE THRU WINDOW TENANT TWO TRASH MECH. MEDINA OUTLOT CONCEPT DESIGN 100'-0" NOVEMBER 13, 2006 TENANT THREE TENANT FOUR 1541-002 RYAN joiBonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects • November 21, 2006 Ms. Kendra Lindahl Principal Planner C/O Landform 800C Butler Square 100 North 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55403 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 551 1 3 Office: 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1 31 1 www.bonestroo.com Re: Clydesdale Marketplace — Lot 2 Block 2 BRA File No. 000190-06000-1 Plat No. 399 Dear Kendra, We have reviewed the preliminary plans for the proposed retail site on Lot 2, Block 2, Clydesdale Marketplace. We have the following preliminary comments with regards to engineering matters: • The grading in the vicinity of the low point in the drive through lane should be revised such that the EOF is at least one foot below the low floor elevation. • There are two typical sidewalk sections on Sheet C5. Only one should be shown. • Structural details or product information will need to be provided for the sidewalk "bridge" located on the north side of the building. • We recommend minor changes to the layout of the drive through lane as follows: o Add striping separating the one way street and drive through lane at the entrance off of Clydesdale Trail. o Continue and extend the median of the drive through lane straight south instead of angling southwest. o Increase the width of the drive through median to decrease the width of the one way street to 18 feet. o Add painted directional arrows on the one way street. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (651) 604-4894. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Darren Amundsen cc: Tom Kellogg Rose Lorsung Bonestroo recently rrErged with DSU, bunging together some of the best regional talents in engineering, architecture, planning, landscape architecture, and urban design. Our confined team now provides integrated services in one organization. ■ St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN • Milwaukee, WI ■ Chicago, IL Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Agenda Item No. PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina Planning Commission FROM: Jennifer Haskamp, Landform through Rose Lorsung, City Planner DATE: December 4, 2006 for the December 12, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting SUBJECT: Ebert Construction. Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Schleeter property located at 1585 Medina Road (23-118-23-22-0004) Landform Project No. MED06026 REVIEW DEADLINE: February 24, 2007 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow the construction of an accessory building on the 20.4-acre property located at 1585 Medina Road. The applicant intends to demolish the existing barn on the site that is used as a private riding stable and construct a new 9,044-square foot accessory building consisting of 5,564-square feet of interior floor area and a 3,480-square foot lean-to porch. The proposed accessory building will be used as a private riding stable. Section 825.19, Subd.3. of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows accessory buildings exceeding 3,000 square feet in size or totaling more than 2 structures by CUP if the property is at least 5 acres in size. 2. CONTEXT: Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed use meets the performance standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the Conditional Use Permit. Zoning and Land Use The property is located outside the MUSA and is zoned Rural Residential (RR) and guided Rural Residential (RR). The surrounding properties are also zoned and guided RR and consist of single family homes on larges lots and agricultural uses. Ebert Construction Re: Schleeter Conditional Use Permit Page 2 December 4, 2006 Natural Characteristics of the Site There is an existing single family home, a barn and two loafing sheds on the property. There is a wetland complex in the northeast portion of the site that has been delineated on the plans. The majority of this wetland is located within FEMA Flood Zone A (the general floodplain district). This wetland is also surrounded by a forest area. The City's natural resource inventory identifies 3 additional wetlands in the middle of the site and 1 wetland complex in the southeast portion of the site. These wetland areas have not been shown on the plans. The wetland complex in the southeast portion of the site is classified as a DNR Protected Water but is not located within the shoreland overlay district. The majority of this wetland is also located within FEMA Flood Zone A. 3. ANALYSIS: Consistency with Ordinance Standards Conditional Use Permit Section 825.19, Subd.3. of the City's Zoning Ordinance states that a conditional use permit is required to allow accessory buildings to exceed an aggregate of 3,000 square feet in size or 2 in number on properties larger than 5 acres. The existing barn will be removed, the two sheds totaling 455 square feet will remain and a new accessory building will be constructed. The applicant is proposing a total of 3 accessory buildings and a total of 9,488 square feet of accessory buildings on this 20.4 acre site. Accessory Building Standards All detached accessory buildings exceeding 200 square feet must meet the following setbacks: Front yard: Side yard: Rear yard: Principle Building: 50 feet 50 feet 50 feet 10 feet Animal structures must also maintain 150-foot setbacks from all property lines. The proposed riding stable meets all the setback requirements. Architecture and Design Standards The height of the accessory building must not exceed the height of the principle building on the site. The existing single family home is 39 feet in height and the proposed accessory building will be 33 feet in height. The proposed accessory building will be constructed of stone wainscoting, steel panel and log siding and asphalt shingles that match the existing home. Metal siding is a permitted building material for accessory buildings in the RR district. Ebert Construction Re: Schleeter Conditional Use Permit Page 3 December 4, 2006 Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control The applicant has shown the proposed grading, drainage pattern and erosion control measures on the plan. The City will require all erosion and sediment control measures to be installed, inspected and approved by the City prior to any work on the site. The applicant must also obtain any necessary permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). Wetlands The plans show a wetland area in the northeast corner of the site. There are additional wetland areas on the site that have not been shown on the plans. Although the applicant is not required to submit a wetland delineation and report to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for review and approval, the plans should be revised to show the general area of all wetlands on the site to ensure that the proposed site work does not impact the wetlands. Floodplain The majority of the wetland areas in the northeast portion and the southeast portion of the site are within FEMA Flood Zone A. However, the floodplain boundary has not been shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the floodplain boundary to ensure that the proposed site work does not impact the floodplain. Conditional Use Permit Standards The Planning Commission shall consider the following relevant factors as outlined in Section 825.39. of the Zoning Ordinance when reviewing a conditional use permit: Subd. 1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. Staff finds that the proposed accessory building will compliment the existing single family home and will not diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. Subd. 2. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. Staff finds that the proposed accessory building complies with all ordinance standards and will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. Subd. 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. The property is accessible from Medina Road and is served by an individual well and septic system. The existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the proposed accessory building. Ebert Construction Re: Schleeter Conditional Use Permit Page 4 December 4, 2006 Subd. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. The existing blacktop driveway will be extended and proposed accessory building will include additional garage parking spaces to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. Subd. S. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. The proposed accessory building will maintain a minimum setback of 200 feet from all property lines and the animal uses will be contained within the accessory building. Any exterior lighting will be required to comply with the City's outdoor lighting ordinance to prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties and public right-of-ways. Subd. 6. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. Staff finds that the request for a larger riding stable is reasonable and will allow the property owners to continually enjoy the use of their property. Subd. 7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. The purpose of the RR district is to allow for a "rural life-style" by permitting low -density residential development in areas that maintain rural services and mixed farming. Staff finds that proposed use of the accessory building as a private horse stable is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code. Subd. 8. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City. Staff finds that the use is not in conflict with the policy plans of the City. Subd. 9. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. Staff finds that the use will not cause a traffic hazard or congestion. Subd. 10. Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. There are other mixed farming and rural service business located in the RR district. Staff finds that these nearby uses will not be adversely affected by the intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. Ebert Construction Re: Schleeter Conditional Use Permit Page 5 December 4, 2006 Subd. 11. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project. The applicant intends to apply for a building permit upon approval of the CUP and will construct the accessory building in spring 2007. Subd. 12. Officer. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning The applicant has provided proof of ownership of the property to the City. 4. CONCLUSION: Staff finds that all of the above standards for granting a CUP have been met. However, after reviewing the application the Planning Commission could reasonably reach a different conclusion. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the CUP subject to the following conditions: 1. The accessory building shall be constructed as indicated on the plans dated October 10, 2006, except as may be amended by this resolution. 2. The accessory building may be used as stable or barn for the keeping and riding of horses or any other permitted accessory uses, provided that the building remains accessory to the single family dwelling on the site and that the building is not used for commercial purposes. 3. Any exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting ordinance. 4. This approval does not include review or approval of any bathroom facilities in the accessory building or additional septics to serve the accessory building. 5. Revise the plans to show the general area of all wetlands on the site to ensure that the proposed site work does not impact the wetlands. 6. Revise the plans to show the floodplain boundary to ensure that the proposed site work does not impact the floodplain. 7. A building permit shall be obtained from the City prior to any work on the site. 8. All erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed, inspected and approved by the City prior to any work on the site. 9. The applicant shall obtain any necessary permits from the MCWD prior to any work on the site. Ebert Construction Re: Schleeter Conditional Use Permit Page 6 December 4, 2006 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Narrative dated September 1, 2006 3. Engineer's Memo, dated October 19, 2006 4. Site Graphics dated October 10, 2006 LekTYEDIN OF Location Map Schleeter Property 1585 Medina Road 0 250 500 I Feet 1,000 .AL LANDFORM MINNEAPOLIS•PHOENI% RECEIVED SEP - September 1, 2006 Planning & Zoning Department City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: Application for Planning Consideration for: Molly and Harry Schleeter 1585 Medina Road Medina, MN 55356 To Whom It May Concern: When Molly and I purchased this property in 2004, it was to carryout a lifelong dream of ours to live in such a community that cherishes and continuously preserves its "rural" heritage. Since the purchase of our property our needs have changed, and the existing horse stable is simply not adequate. We would love nothing more than to remove the existing horse stable on site and replace it with a slightly larger, more esthetically pleasing building that will fulfill our current needs, improve our quality of life and upgrade our property. Please consider our application for a Conditional Use Permit. Res • ully Submitt 2006 Bonestroo 0 Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects October 19, 2006 Ms. Kendra Lindahl Principal Planner C/O Landform 800C Butler Square 100 North 6`h Street Minneapolis, MN 55403 2335 west Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 Office: 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-131 I www.bonestroo.com Re: 1585 Medina Road BRA File No. 000190-06000-1 Plat No. 407 Dear Kendra, We have reviewed the revised Preliminary Survey prepared by Gronberg & Associates, Inc. dated 10- 10-06 for the proposed improvements to 1585 Medina Road. The plans show a new barn to be constructed in the location of an existing barn. We have the following preliminary comments with regards to engineering matters: • The proposed improvements appear to be acceptable from an engineering perspective. • All erosion and sediment control measures should be installed, inspected, and approved by the city prior to any work on site. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (651) 604-4894. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Darren Amundsen Cc: Tom Kellogg Bonestroo recently merged with DS U, bringing together some of the best regional talents in engineering, architecture, planning, landscape architecture, and urban design. Our combined team now provides integrated services in one organization. • St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN • Milwaukee, WI ■ Chicago, IL Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned u rr-.1ff 1 I i 6 O r CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MOLLY AND HARRY SCHLEETER IN THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 23-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ mr.a: \ )/ 18`% HOUSE DETAIL NME ,J19>3 _S LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PRMISES The mut pp<ouM of INNMM1xvU puMm 015.50t, RS. io.mNiJ IIS NwN. Wpo 3S Wo31 CLAM SN PMtiJN MonM1un EXCEPT IIw eaN iiRO(wMarker l Nttml —1003. OrwWas 061in9 wolwe -DO*, msm proporAd[prlWf Be . own oeo 1.12., mvwapy ]wrn 11.td:M nay snow W ea..COna:. d No oMm MmhC pepanY. nM YelmNen el an w'brg Mau..LbWOJ omowy.oM41x0p.0C Wm Noron 0.v. M purpyltea :Mx any Wwr unpownanr. or nnsm Nmnu Uz^`� z6=^ E6t el w=ww a <n2 a g� UWiLL O wpw Q,m/ a 5om 3Y Kw°1 0]-3z z Wio W24. O� 0 I,q n N i.T • Tic as krt1 E. i FI% _ --=ifs N:s MOLLY & HARRY SCHLEETER 1585 MEDINA ROAD MEDINA, MINNESOTA 55356 o.t," M� N0 MOLLY & HARRY SCHLEETER 1585 MEDINA ROAD MEDINA, MINNESOTA 55356 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT Meeting Minutes Tuesday, November 14, 2006 1. Call to Order: Chair Crosby called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Present: Planning Commissioners Tom Crosby, Jeff Pederson, Doug Dickerson, Marilyn Fortin, Sharon Johnson and Robin Reid. Absent: Planning Commissioner Mary Verbick Also Present: City Planner Rose Lorsung; City Planning Consultant Kendra Lindahl; Planning & Public Works Assistant Dusty Finke 2. Public Comments: None The general consensus of the Commission was to move to agenda item #6. 6. Rising Sun Memorial Park Lorsung delivered the staff report on the application. She described the property (area, zoning, guiding, Peter Lake, tree cover, slopes, wetlands). She described the concept elevation drawings of the above -ground structures in comparison to the screening proposed by the applicant. Lorsung reviewed the recent update to the cemetery ordinance. Lorsung reviewed some possible issues the Planning Commission could discuss. Additional setbacks for residential homes (100 feet on west and south) could be required, as well as additional setbacks for Highway 55 expansion (100 feet). The city could require that lawn sprinkling come from NURP ponds, not city water. Additionally, the Commission could discuss further berming/screening requirements. Lorsung stated that the level of discretion that the City has on a CUP and Site Plan are relatively low if all ordinances are met. Lorsung stated that there are 35 conditions suggested in the staff report if the Planning Commission were to recommend approval. Crosby stated that certain uses have been historically allowed in residential districts, including churches, schools, and cemeteries. Crosby read ordinance language that stated that City Council shall consider that the Conditional Use will not be injurious to the enjoyment of property or substantially impair property values. He also read a clause that stated that in addition to the conditions set forth in the cemetery ordinance, the City Council may add additional conditions they deem reasonable to maintaining the residential character of the area. 1 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Crosby stated that it looks as if the Planning Commission would hold the public hearing tonight and hear from the applicant and a number of residents. The Commission would then continue the discussion at the December meeting as well. Lorsung stated that there were some apparent errors on the plan set including things with regard to setbacks, property boundaries, location and orientation of neighboring homes, etc. Richard Gay — Rising Sun Memorial Park — stated that they had applied in July. The application triggered an update to the city ordinances and staff asked for more time to research and update. The applicant reluctantly agreed to the extension. Gay stated that the submittal meets the updated ordinance and should be approved tonight. The items that still need to be worked on can be done so with the staff. Gay stated that since the applicant is following the ordinance, they believe the city should as well. They understand that there are issues that come up because of the type of application and will work hard to approach any issues with neighboring property owners. Gay stated that the cemetery would be non-sectarian and would be available for everyone of any faith, which would be an asset or the city. It would be a burial location of choice for people in the western suburbs as none in the area rise to the level of the proposal. Buildings would be placed in areas where current barns are located. There is 25% less square footage of structures proposed than already exist on the property. There will not be grave markers all over the site, and there will be continual improvements to landscaping. It will be open to the public, with trails for walking. The applicant is working with the Minnesota Land Trust to set up conservation easements in the wooded and wetland areas. Gay stated that a majority of the conditions in the November 7 staff report have been met. Some were carryovers and have been addressed already. The lot lines are correct, but there are some small items that need to be approached. Gay stated that the staff report had discussed screening, and the landscape plan included a type of deciduous trees that would give screening 12 months a year. Gay stated that the slope of the lot provides a layout where burial monuments would be almost impossible to see from neighboring properties. The proposal includes only flush monuments within 50 feet within property lines. Public Hearing opened at 7:32 p.m. Jack Vilski — co-owner of 3595 Pioneer Trail — stated that he had been in real estate of 30 years and has sold 2000 homes or more. He has his name on $4 million worth of mortgages. His experience lends him credibility. He stated that he would have never undertaken a guaranteed buyout if he knew there would be a cemetery in the vicinity. He stated that in his 30 years of experience, he has seen many factors impact the value of homes. However, the main is Location, location, location. In 2002, he had a home on the market for 90 days with 70 showings and 0 offers. It was reasonably priced, but backed up to a cemetery. Vilski stated that new state laws makes disclosure a huge issue. A seller must disclose any issue that may occur with the property, or they are in deep trouble. He stated that Asian culture states that they cannot be within a certain distance of cemeteries, so he must disclose that there is a proposal. 2 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) He inquired if we need a cemetery there; there seem to be cemeteries that aren't even filled. He stated that people who bought property in the area bought for the land as is was, and this will drastically impact the property values. Crosby stated that there is a definite devaluation of property values. Allen Litts — 4660 Covey Trail — stated that he owned the property to the west. He objects strongly because the proposal impacts his property enjoyment and value. His home is tilted in a way so that the large proposed structures will be all that can be seen from the back of their home. He stated that the burial sites are 57 feet from the home. Litts stated that the plans misrepresent the location of their home and the distance to burial sites. The structures are larger than the current barns, not smaller. The density is jammed within 4'/2 acres of the 26-acre site. The people who say that they would not mind living next to cemeteries often change their minds when they hear about above -ground structures. The city should require water, well, water table, environmental studies. Highway 55 is already dangerous, and this cemetery receives access from the highway. Long processions will cause huge problems. He stated that the 100-foot setback should include structures such as mausoleums. The change in use should trigger the office coming into compliance with code, which would include setbacks. He stated that he also presented a letter that and some photos Tim Lambrecht — 4605 Wichita Trail — stated that the staff report seems to focus on the Litts' property, but doesn't speak about properties across the lake. He stated that he meant to speak with Lorsung about his concerns ahead of the meeting, but was not able to find the time. Their property is across from Peter Lake from the site and the see the sunset over the lake and over the site. He stated that hopes that the next staff report will also discuss impacts to his property and his neighbors across the lake. Lambrecht stated that the developer stated that he would approach concerns with the western neighbors with bushes and screening, but from the opposite side of the lake, the property is cascading down in clear view. Lake Peter has a big issue with water level. There was a beaver problem, and a culvert was put in to drain the lake. However, he and his father-in-law go out to clear the culvert every four days. The DNR even issued a permit to eliminate some of the beavers. Tom Hovey stated that they were not even aware of the water levels. An assessment must be done because the lake is sometimes 7-feet deeper than normal levels. He also stated that culverts are a bad idea because beavers love to dam them up. Lorsung stated that condition #8 already states that the DNR will need to establish the Ordinary High Water on the Lake. The DNR will be made aware of the fluctuations in the water level. Lorsung described the site plan, showing the setback from the ordinary high water level. The wetland setback is currently more restrictive, so if the ordinary high water mark does not change significantly, the shoreland setback will not be overcome the wetland setback. Fu Wong — 4600 Covey Trail — stated that they moved to Medina three years ago because of the beauty of the open spaces in Medina. Peter Lake is a beautiful private lake and provides unique green space and wildlife. This is the definition of open space. Wong stated that the cemetery will have severe impacts on the Open Space elements. Additionally, he and his family are from Chinese background. In Chinese culture, it is not acceptable to live near a cemetery. It creates 3 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) ill -harmony and residents of homes next to cemeteries will be plagued by bad fortunes for generations to come. If this would be approved, he and his family would have really no other choice to involuntarily move. The proposal is invasive and intrusive to his rights as a property owner. Wong stated that their minds are constantly on the fact that if this proposal goes forward, they will be forced to find a new place to live. It makes his property inhabitable. The developer has stated that you cannot see into the burial areas. This may be true from the ground, but not from the home. This is a permanent establishment that will be there forever. It has the longest possible term impact on the property and neighboring properties. Pat Tillman — 22410 Highway 55 — expressed concern about the proposal. He has lived at the property to the north for 20 years. He bought because of the views over Peter Lake and the wildlife. He stated that he asked his daughters (age 11 and 14) what they thought about seeing a mausoleum across the street and their first words were: "ewww." They do not want to see the cemetery; they don't want to grow up with it. Tillman stated that his home is 50 feet above the property, no screening can block that. The future commercial use in the area could be 20 years down the line, and until then he will live where no amount of screening will block the cemetery. Gary Roller — representing Richard Burke (3962 Tomahawk Trail) — stated that Mr. Burke was very opposed to the cemetery. The city is currently proposing an Open Space plan, and this property is right in the center of it. Roller stated that this does not fit in. It is not one single issue creating a problem. Rather there is a cumulative effect in the short term, and even greater in the long term. Because the property is permanent, decisions must be based on the long term. Jim Reeder — Corcoran resident — stated that while he is not adjacent to property, he stated that the applicant letter said that the cemetery will not allow gunfire. This is offensive and a slap in the face to veterans who have served the country. He requests that it be stricken from any proposal. There is no logical reason to disallow gun fire. Noise is not a concern being between Highway 55 and the train tracks. Additionally, gun fire already exists during hunting season. Public Hearing closed at 8:10 p.m. Crosby suggested that the Commission step through the topics for discussion in the staff report. • prohibiting use of the easement to the lake on the south side of the property Crosby inquired to Gay if the property has any rights to the easement. Gay replied that it did not. Crosby stated that this is probably not an issue • access for funeral procession being only on Highway SS and not through the residential area Lorsung stated that this provision was added because there was a fear expressed that the processions would wind around Pioneer Trail so that they could turn right into the cemetery. • the proximity to the cemetery and proposed burials as they are within 50 feet of two residential backyards (staff proposes a 100 foot setback on the north, west and south sides for burials -not headstones but rather bodies) 4 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Lorsung stated that there is nothing within the ordinance speaking about setbacks for burials from residential dwellings. This provision approaches the issue. • The future expansion of Trunk Highway 55 and the permanent land use. The requirement of 100 foot setback on the north side for burials would solve this issue. Lorsung stated this would allow for future expansion. • screening including a six-foot cedar fence and additional trees on the west and south side Lorsung stated that this was discussed because of the proximity of neighbors' homes. • proximity to the residential wells Lorsung stated that this issue has more to do with drawdown during sprinkling than is has to do with pollution. • requirements for sprinkling that doesn't use city water Lorsung stated that this provision would only take affect if and when the property is served. • the conversion of the house to an office and the non -conforming setbacks on the west side (20 ) Lorsung stated that as long as there are no additions, the structure can remain non- conforming as far as setbacks. • hours of operation Lorsung stated that this should be discussed because of the residential nature of the area. • prohibition of future crematorium Although no crematorium is shown, it should be noted that it will not be allowed in the future. Additionally, this site plan should be thought of as the Master Plan for the cemetery and it should look as close to possible to what will happen in the future. • the scattering of ashes • density of the proposed buildings all with immediate proximity to the resident to the west's backyard Lorsung stated that this could be a way to approach some of the neighbor concerns. Crosby suggested that the city should prepare a development agreement sooner rather than later. Dickerson stated the he respects what the applicant is doing, but it seems like the wrong spot for the cemetery. Although it is within the ordinances, it is the City's fault for not having a better ordinance. He stated that the permanency of the use brings up legal issues. There are also issues with safety. A few decades in the future, Highway 55 will be four lanes. 100 years from now, it may be an interstate and the cemetery will still be there. Dickerson stated that the state will not be able to use eminent domain to move bodies to increase the size of Highway 55. Traffic will not be coming from Medina because there are no funeral homes. Dickerson stated that funeral processions can be miles long. He stated that it is a concern that the land will not be 5 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) taxable. Dickerson inquired what would happen if after a number of the sites are sold they go bankrupt...who would take over? Johnson stated that this is a classic example of "not in my backyard." She stated that this is an allowed use. The decision is made at a comprehensive plan level. She stated that there is no way to guarantee everyone's complete privacy to their land. There is no way the city can make a moral decision to not allow a use just because a bunch of people didn't like it. She stated that unless someone can give grounds for not allowing it except that people don't like it, the city doesn't have the right to deny it. Crosby stated that churches are different now than the traditionally. The city ordinances don't seem to deal with the 21st century uses of churches and cemeteries. He would like to see if the buildings could be placed on the east of the road or towards the north of the property. This would respect the rights of the adjacent land owners and would push it where it was less unappealing. Crosby stated that the landscaping should be improved so that screening will be possible into the long term. He also stated that the plans should show specifics of the parking for processions. Fortin stated that it is a permitted use within the district. However, she agrees with the letters and emails that the use is injurious to the enjoyment of property and the property values. Pederson stated that he would have liked more time to work on the ordinance when it was updated. There is an obvious effect to the neighboring property owners. He stated that access off of Highway 55 could lead to fatalities and that there should be a right-in/right-out. He asked how they designed a mound system if they don't know how many people will be using it. Crosby stated that the ordinance does leave a certain amount of flexibility in the last clause. Conditions can be added within reason to protect the neighbors. Reid stated that this project will not benefit Medina residents. The character of this cemetery is very different than schools, churches and cemeteries. This will diminish property values and traffic issues are a concern Public Hearing re -opened at 8:41 p.m. Vilski stated that the major concern with approving anything was how a use can keep going. He also stated that a six-foot cedar fence is not a permanent fence. Lambrecht stated that 100 vehicles would seem to fit on the private road. Cars would then try to park on Highway 55 and in the neighborhoods in the area. Public Hearing closed at 8:46 p.m. Crosby stated that these are not easy decisions for the Commission or Council. The Planning Commission recessed briefly from 8:47 p.m. until 8:58 p.m. 6 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) 7. United Properties Ferrell Gas Redevelopment Concept Plan: 3575 Sioux Drive Lorsung delivered the staff report. She showed the area of the concept plan and the conceptual site plan. Drive-thrus would be for a retail site (coffee) as well as credit union. The application will most likely need a number of variances in order to be approved. Three of these variances arise because of the Uptown Hamel district and difficult regulations for drive-thrus. The remaining two variances arise because of the proximity to Elm Creek. Lorsung summarized the comments from staff. There appear to some traffic issues to address (both internally on the site and externally). The Transportation Plan shows a frontage road going through this site and the commercial piece to the west. The applicant's concept plan shows these improvements being made as per the Transportation Plan. The DNR, Watershed District and city engineers will all be looking carefully at the use of best management practices if the city were to grant the variance for shoreland setback and impervious surfaces. There was also discussion about the layout of the site in relation to the Uptown Hamel district and discussion about how to make the site a gateway to Uptown Hamel. Lorsung stated that while this is a non -binding discussion but as much direction as possible should be given to the Crosby stated that he believes as a concept, there is one main issue for the Planning Commission to discuss. He inquired if a retail development with two drive-thrus is the correct use for this property. Pederson stated that he is owner of the property to the west. He would mainly be taking part in this conversation as a business owner and resident instead of a Planning Commissioner. He stated that he had met with Lorsung and the city on where the frontage road should be located. The road should be located close to Highway 55 on the north. It should not come through the center of existing buildings. If there is going to be road, it should be shown only on their property, not ghost platted through neighboring buildings. Additionally, there should be some berming or screening. Eric Simmer — United Properties — Stated that because of the proximity to Highway 55, retail with drive-thrus make a lot of sense and would be a great asset to the city. He stated that the Members First Credit Union is excited to move forward. Simmer stated that they were excited to make this project a gateway to the Uptown Hamel area, a project that everyone can be proud of. He stated that if the site will be held to the 25% impervious surfaces rule, this project will obviously be impossible, as will most commercial projects. Tom Worst — HTG Architects — Stated that the main thing you see when you drive up is the large retaining wall. The elevations attempt to show look similar to the retaining wall. The landscaping and sign could all link together to make it a gateway. Crosby inquired what the MnDOT comments were. 7 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Lorsung stated that MnDOT had requested a traffic study, which would fit in nicely with the city's study of its transportation plan. Public Hearing opened 9:20 p.m. Dan Parks — Westwood Engineering — questioned why a transportation study for MnDOT was necessary. There is no access to the state Highway. Additionally, there is not a lot that can be done with the results. There is limited room for expansion of Sioux Drive, and little room for a long right -turn lane on the southbound Sioux. Reid stated that it appears as an appropriate use of the site and a good transition into Uptown Hamel. It appears to be a nice project for the use. Fortin stated that it would be an asset and a good gateway to Uptown Hamel. She stated that it seems to make sense for the coffee shop to be where the bank is located. Simmer replied that he agreed and so would the potential coffee shop. This site plan was very preliminary because this it is a concept plan at this point. The size and location of structures may change in the time before the next submittal. Crosby stated that he likes it as a land use. His concerns are with Highway 55 Rental and the frontage road issue. He also stated that there appears to be room to locate the buildings so that they can have two fronts and look attractive from both sides. Crosby stated that a traffic analysis must be done to see if two drive-thrus can fit functionally in this location. Johnson inquired about the frontage road. Commissioners and staff discussed the frontage road location the way it was linked to the south frontage road. Dickerson stated that he likes the land use. He inquired about the number of drive-thrus for the bank. Simmer replied that there would be three lanes, an ATM lane and a drive -by. Dickerson stated that previous drive-thrus had been denied. He inquired how this fits in with that. Lorsung replied that the Ryan development had been a PUD, which meant that all land use regulations were open for discussion. The decision was to restrict drive-thrus. This project would not include a rezoning, so there is discretion on uses. Dickerson stated that the view from the top of Hamel Road should be considered, because rooftop equipment can be extremely ugly. Public Hearing closed at 9:39 p.m. 8 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) 8. Bazinet/Otten & Dalbec Preliminary Plat: 3003 & 3085 Hamel Road Lindahl delivered the staff report. She showed the existing two lots, and how the properties would be arranged to create a new lot to the east. All three lots are over the minimum lot size and have the required amount of suitable soils. The third lot on the east is to be sold as a future home site. Septic systems have a 150-foot setback from School Lake. The existing septic on Lot 2 does not meet this setback and would be non -conforming. In the case that this septic system has to be re -built, it would need to meet setbacks. Lindahl stated that Hennepin County requested a 50-foot %2 right-of-way. In previous plats along Hamel Road, the Council has approved 33-foot right-of-ways and this plat shows 33 feet of right-of-way. While there are wetlands on the sites, no wetland impacts are noted. Lindahl stated that the Park Commission will discuss this plat at a future meeting because a right- of-way trail is shown on the Trails Plan along Hamel Road. A 15-foot trail easement along Hamel Road would fulfill the Park Dedication requirements for the plat. Lindahl stated that staff recommends approval of the preliminary plats subject to the proposed conditions discussed in the staff report. Public Hearing opened at 9:45 p.m. Crosby stated that he has no problems, as the plat meets ordinance and requires no variances. Dickerson inquired about the 15-foot easement on the south of Hamel Road. It is difficult to tell which side of the road the trail would be placed. Lorsung stated that on previous plats, a precedent has been set for acquiring trail easements on the south side of Hamel Road. Motion by Fortin, seconded by Pederson to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat along with the 15 conditions noted in the staff report. Motion passes unanimously (Verbick absent). 9. Gary Kirt/Alpine Farms Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit — 2182 Homestead Trail Lindahl delivered the staff report. She showed the existing 72 acre lot and how the parcel would be divided to create the additional lot to the east. Both lots meet minimum lot size and suitable soils requirements. The proposed new lot is a flag lot with a long, narrow area for a driveway along the southern boundary. There are large areas of wetlands and floodplains on the site and it is in the shoreland overlay district. The submittal will need to show the creek and setbacks from the creek, but it appears that those requirements should be easily met. No wetland fill is proposed at this time. However, when lot 2 develops, wetland will need to be filled in order to allow for a driveway. At that time they will need to have an approved wetland mitigation plan if the disturbance is more than de minimus 9 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Lindahl stated that this application will also go before the Parks Commission. Although the Trails Plan does not show a trail at this time, a trail in this area makes a lot of sense because of the horse uses in the area and the proximity to the County Park. A trail easement would act as the park dedication for this plat. The applicant does have some concerns with this trail dedication. Lindahl noted that the new lot should be rezoned because no commercial horse facility is proposed. The Conditional Use Permit needs to be amended to note the change in legal description. Lindahl concluded that staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat along with conditions in the staff report. Staff also recommends approval of the rezoning from RR-2 to Rural Residential and the amendment to the existing conditional use permit. S. Todd Rapp — Attorney for applicant — discussed the manure management plan for the existing commercial horse facility. Although there was some staff comment about the proximity of manure storage to wetlands, an approved plan is in place that is designed to make water to run 250+ feet along a swale so that it can not impact the wetland. Crosby stated that the existing horse facility, the western lot, is not necessarily part of the discussion for this meeting. Rapp stated that the western lot would have 18.3% impervious surfaces, meeting city requirements. Lindahl stated that this should be noted on the plat. Rapp stated that Mark Gronberg is of the opinion that any wetland impacts for the driveway should be de minimus Crosby stated that he would be more comfortable with having a mitigation plan ahead of the approval of the plat. If this does not happen, the city may be backed into a corner because in three years a person could come in for a permit and demand access to their site. Rapp stated that he had gone through the conditions for approval. He understands that conditions will be placed on the buyer of the second lot when they come in for a building permit. The most significant issue is the proposed trail that is sought along the County Road. This is not in any comprehensive plan. Additionally, there is the practical constraint that there is a wetland in the northwest corner of the property that would be impacted if there was a trail. Additionally, there is a trail within the Park on the western side of the road already. Public Hearing opened at 10:10 pm Alice Flischaker — 1942 Homestead Trail — stated that she is concerned that the driveway easement may become a public road if the second lot were ever to be divided farther. She also stated that she is concerned how close the driveway will be located to her property. Lorsung stated that under current ordinance there could be no more subdividing on this second lot. 10 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Reid stated that this location is significant because of the views. Hopefully the horse facility will be is existence for many years to come. Otherwise, there do not seem to be any issues. Pederson stated that his only concern was the wetland mitigation issue. Fortin stated that she has no issues except for the driveway. She stated that she is a little shaky on leaving the issue for the future. Crosby stated he believed the wetland/driveway issue should be approached now. Johnson stated that she thought the city did not want flag lots because they cause troubles. Commissioners replied that flag lots were added to the ordinance as an alternative to narrow lots. Dickerson agreed with Crosby that the wetland mitigation issue should be taken care of at this time. Rapp stated that the conditions of approval as proposed already state that if the wetland impacts are more than de minimus, the mitigation must be completed. He suggested an easy fix would be to put the requirement against the deed. Public Hearing Closed at 10:25 p.m. Motion by Crosby, seconded by Johnson to recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to the 20 conditions noted in the staff report, along with an additional condition that language is added to take care of the wetland mitigation issue. Motion passes unanimously (Verbick absent). Motion by Fortin, seconded by Dickerson to recommend rezoning Lot 2 to Rural Residential. Motion passes unanimously (Verbick absent). Motion by Reid, seconded by Johnson to recommend approval of the amendment to the existing Conditional Use Permit reducing the acreage and changing the legal description. Motion passes unanimously (Verbick absent). The general consensus of the Commission was to move back to agenda item #3. 3. Update from City Council Proceedings Lorsung stated that the High Pointe Ridge Final Plat was approved. She also noted that the Council discussed a petition disallow truck traffic on Willow Drive. The Council directed staff to study the matter further. The Council also discussed resident traffic concerns on CR 116. 11 Medina Planning Commission November 14, 2006 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) 4. City Planner's Report Lorsung stated that the following applications will most likely appear on the December Planning Commission: Rising Sun Cemetery (continued), Ryan Companies Retail Site (PUD Amendment, Plat withdrawn), Bancor Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and 2 CUPs in the Rural Residential for accessory structures over 3000 sq. ft. 5. Approval of October 10, 2006 Planning Commission Minutes Motion by Fortin, seconded by Reid to approve the October 10, 2006 Planning Commission Minutes as amended. Motion passes unanimously (Verbick absent). 10. Adiourn: Motion by Reid, seconded by Dickerson to adjourn at 10:40 p.m. Motion passes unanimously (Verbick absent). 12 Agenda Item: 9 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, Assistant to Planning & Public Works; through Rose Lorsung, City Planner DATE: December 5, 2006 MEETING: December 12, 2006 Planning Commission SUBJ: RJ Ryan/Hasselquist Conditional Use Permit; 2705 Willow Drive — Public Hearing General On October 2, 2006, RJ Ryan Company, on behalf of property owner Peter Hasselquist, applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct a 7,200 square foot accessory structure at 2705 Willow Drive (PID# 16-118-23-41-0004). City ordinances (Section 825.19) state that a residential property over 3 acres in size are permitted a maximum of two accessory structures or an aggregate size of 3,000 square feet. However, additional accessory structures (number or size) are conditional uses in properties over 5 acres in size. Site Details 2705 Willow Drive is a 17.63 acre parcel zoned as Rural Residential (RR). There are a number of CUPS in the area allowing accessory structures in excess of 3,000 square feet. Skyrock Farm is directly to the north, which has an existing CUP for a commercial horse facility. The Planning Commission and City Council recently approved of a CUP for a 15,000 sq. ft. accessory structure at the Evanson property to the northeast. There are numerous other CUPS in the area as well (see map below: the purple properties have existing CUP for accessory structures in excess of 3000 sq. ft.; the green properties are existing commercial horse facilities). HEhh CC ;ARK RES ❑IS - Hasselquist property (2705 Willow Dr) COUNTY RO `R^RK'OE'NEOLIEE-RIAN LC l There are some wetlands in the southwest corner of the property, but all construction will be set back over 180' and no impacts are to be made. Structures on the property include the home, a swimming pool with pool house, a gazebo, a playhouse, a corn crib, and an existing building that will be demolished in order to construct the new barn. Additionally, a tennis court is located north of the home. (see aerial of property below). 2705 UVILLOW DR I G'l 18234'10004 F'ETER L HASSELOLJ[ST ET AL Cc) eup,n¢ 2.736. Rcmmvtrylemm.timl Building Details The proposed structure is 7,200 square feet in size and will take the place of an existing building of approximately 1,550 square feet. The barn does have proposed animal use, both a chicken coop and horse stalls, and meets the required 150' setback for animal structures. The proposed barn will also include a bathroom, and a septic design will need to be approved by the City prior to issuance of a building permit. Construction of the barn seems to impact four significant trees along the northwest corner of the building. However, the plans do show eight new deciduous trees planted along Willow Drive to provide additional screening. Staff is recommending a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees in this area in order to ensure year-round screening. The plans show an additional driveway to be installed to service the barn, along with a new curb cut along Willow Drive. City ordinances (section 400.11) do allow for two curb cuts if certain regulations (100' frontage, acceptable storm water plan) are met and if the property owner enters into an agreement with the City which includes terms and conditions of the additional driveway. This property meets the minimum regulations for having two curb cuts, although the City Engineer is recommending that access be granted off of the existing driveway. City ordinances 2 do expressly allow for conditions to be set on the amount of access points in the process of reviewing a Conditional Use Permit. If the Planning Commission is to recommend approval of a second driveway, staff recommends discussion of any terms or conditions to be added to the driveway agreement that must be entered into between the owner and the City. The elevations show that the building will be approximately 28 feet in height by the way that City ordinances measure building height (from the average between the peak and the eave). This does not take into effect the decorative elements on the roof, which have a gross height of 52 feet from ground level (see below). The building does meet height requirements, although city ordinances do allow the City to place restrictions on the height of buildings as part of the Conditional Use Permit review. • :—_ on— 52' gross height 28' height meets ordinance 74.1,011 A3 Conditional Use Permit Ordinance Compliance While reviewing Conditional Use Permits, City ordinances (Section 825.39) state that the City should consider the following: Subd.1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. Staff believes that the similarity between this use and uses in the area will not present issues for property enjoyment. Additionally, screening of the barn will actually be improved. Subd. 2. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. There is no vacant property in the area that will likely develop under current guiding and zoning. 3 Subd. 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. The City's engineer has reviewed the plans and do not bring forward any major issues, except for suggesting only one curb cut to the property. Subd. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. There will be no commercial use of the structure, so no additional parking or loading is necessary. Subd. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. The City will require any lighting to comply with Section 829.04, where all lighting must be downcast in order to maintain a dark sky rural area. Subd. 6. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. Staff believes that the proposed barn is consistent with uses in the area and to the overall rural character of Medina. Subd. 7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. Staff believes the use is consistent with the Rural Residential district. Subd. 8. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City. Staff believes the use is consistent with the "diversified rural" guiding. Subd. 9. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. There will be no commercial use of this facility, and the use is consistent with many in the surrounding areas. Traffic impacts should, therefore, be similar to those by neighboring parcels. Subd.10. Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. The only business in the area is Skyrock Farm, a commercial horse facility, and this property is well screened, and has little lighting. Subd.11. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project. The applicant was already seeking a building permit before becoming aware that a CUP was necessary. Construction should start in the spring of 2007. Subd.12. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning Officer. The property owner signed on to the application from the start. 4 Right -of -Way Easement Currently, the City does not have dedicated right-of-way along the west side of Willow Drive adjacent to this property. The property line actually extends into Willow Drive. The City does hold a prescriptive easement over the traveled road because it funds the maintenance. Usually, the City will receive right-of-way when an owner plats property. The City has started a precedent of requesting right-of-way easements during the review of land use projects that border city streets where there is no right-of-way. The City will bear the cost of preparing all easement documents and filing them. Staff is excited to further discuss with the applicant the possibility of establishing this easement. City Discretion The City has a relatively low level of discretion when it comes to reviewing Conditional Use Permits. If the application meets City ordinances, the CUP should be approved. However, the City may impose conditions that protect the best interests of the surrounding community and the city as a whole. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 7,200 square foot accessory structure with the following conditions: 1) The applicants and owners shall warrant that the accessory structure proposed is for private use only, and that no commercial and/or fee -based horse boarding or training, storage or other activities shall occur; 2) This CUP will allow the following accessory structures on the property at a maximum: 7,200 sq. ft. barn, 3,815 sq. ft. pool and pool deck, 260 sq. ft. pool house/porch, 132 sq. ft. play house, 75 sq. ft. gazebo, and 80 sq. ft. corn crib; 3) The applicant shall meet requirements of the MPCA with regard to manure management; 4) The applicant shall submit a septic design acceptable by the City prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed barn; 5) The applicant shall pull necessary permits and demolish the existing 1,532 sq. ft. accessory building before construction of the proposed barn; 6) The applicant shall add coniferous trees in place of or in addition to the proposed trees shown in the plans to the southeast of the proposed barn to ensure year-round screening; 7) If a second curb cut is allowed off of Willow Drive, the applicant shall execute a driveway agreement with the City as required by Medina Code section 410.11; 8) If the area disturbed by grading is greater than 1 acre in area, the applicant shall present the city with a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and also proof that the SWPPP was approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; 9) The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; and 10) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in the amount sufficient to pay for all costs associated with the review of the Conditional Use Permit application. Attachments 1) Site Map 2) Applicant Letter 3) Plans dated 10-26-06 (including survey, site plan, floor plans, elevations) 4) City Engineer memo dated 11-21-06 5 Site Location: 2705 Willow Drive sparzem Ei=1 lr.. VOA Cr= A RiElefliff.a=inr.lairmL...01 ...4 •" III riar-23:1 07.11"; nu 11, ,dwatzursmallag962atiltil-Itna EX .' iiiiEtraijniniligigiSWPneriati za ISEIrLIN v-Val_r Plki. AI: 1:ffir will 21, ar ilalell I iniallA ilrolliff:wizmovi Pr ill l1...rezdauinw ; - !Nil I!■iMEMl S2 MAvail PinailinCrrairl, Co 6---,;,,:,,CI im Bilk imanimvit Ain A Imp lempo IN...samosa imingpres. Medina Street & Address Finder Map 41 42 OA November 21, 2006 City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Hamel, MN 55340 Attn: Planning Staff RE: 2705 Willow Drive Medina, MN Dear Planning Staff: I am requesting a conditional use permit to construct a bam structure that is 4200 square feet over the 3000 square feet maximum. This structure will be used for hobby farming, personal horse stalls and storage of personal equipment (no portion of this barn will be used for commercial horse boarding or storage). This structure will be placed on the 16 plus acre property to allow access from Willow Drive and be partially screened by the existing landscaping. I am willing to work with the Planning staff and their recommendations. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions. Peter L. Hasselquist 612-328-2769 Peter L. Hasselquist 2705 Willow Drive Hamel, MN 55340 `lECLT D Construction, Inc. 1100 Mendota Heights Road • Mendota Heights, MN 55120 • (651) 681-0200 • Fax (651) 681-023; October 25, 2006 City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Hamel, MN 55340 Attn: Planning Staff Re: 2705 Willow Drive Medina, MN Dear Planning Staff: As the owner's representative, we are requesting a conditional use permit to construct a barn structure that is 4200 square feet over the 3000 square feet maximum. This structure will be used for hobby farming, personal horse stalls and storage of personal equipment (no portion of this barn will be used for commercial horse boarding or storage). This structure has been placed on the 16 acre property to allow access from Willow drive and be partially screened by the existing landscaping. We are willing to work with the Planning staff and their recommendations. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions. Sincerely, R.J. R ,' ON; T" CTION, INC. Brian Trombley Project Manager BT:bk Hasselquist Residence Planning Staff 10-25-06.doc An Equal Opportunity Employer HASSELQUIST RESIDENCE Medina, Minnesota ECEti'VE OCT — 2 ?oos \----C;1/11-#401‘5 NOTE DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. AC NAL COLORS NEED '0 BE FIELD VERIFIED. p(N O I I .I I I I I 1 \ EXISTING TREES----i 10 Bc HEMCbLU (TYP.)i. 2{ —0" 12'-0 20 —0" 1, 00 —0" —, _�- EXIST. BLDG..— TO BE I .) I JEMOUSHED 18,E `rf a .weepT '' 1 SITE PLAN Al SCALE: 1" = 30' aCR[TF PAYERS —NEW LOCH FOR LXIS L LI(dH I POLL, VERIFY Wi G.C. —EX SUNG PAVERS TO SE RELOCATED/ EXTENDED —EXIST. LIGHT POLE TO BE RELOCATED NEW POURED CONC. DRIVE I n, 'I EXIST NG j \ { \` 10 f�i GARDEN \•.,_ SEE SURVEY NORTH / PROPCSED TREES (8 THUS) VERIFY QTY. & LOC'N W/ G.C. ea;; 0/yCq fTE.'pA Rs SITE INFORMATION: ZONING: RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 7,20G S.F. PER FLOOR f 900z , 2 100 i d NOTE TO ALL DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTORS AND THEIR, SUB —CONTRACTORS: THE DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTOR S RESPOYSIBLE FOR REVIEWING ALL MECHANICAL, ELECRICAL, PLUMBING, FIRE SPRINKLER, CR ANY OTHER DESIGN/BUILD SUB— CONTRACTOR'S DOCUMENTS AS PERTAINING TO THE WORK FOR THIS PROJECT. IT IS THE DESIGN/BUILD SUB— CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE DESIGN/BLILD CONTRACTOR OF ANY CONFLICTS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS DUE TO SIZES, LOCATIONS, QUAN—IT1ES, RCUGH—IN DIMENSIONS AND CODE INTERPRE— TATIONS. THE DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTI=YING THE ARCHITECT IMMED ATELY OF ANY ARCHITECTJRA_ REVISIONS REQUIRED DUE TO THE COOR— DINATION OF EACH DESIGN/BUILD SUB —CONTRACTORS DOCUMENTS. LAMPER T ARCHITECTS 13637 NE Lincoln Sireef Ham Lake, MN 55304 101 Phanr.7e3.755.1211 F.:765757.2849 Ianpart0 amparl—arah.ea.a ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIB PLAIT. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY N_ OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPEP,MSION AND THAT I AU A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LA/PIS OF THE STATE OOP'MINNESOTA ,wiulurr: LEONARD LAMPERT ?PINT NAME 15569 u_ u+•s 10.02.06 Plicne (651) 681-0200 Fox (651) 681-0235 RjR.yan Construction, Inc. tT00 Mentlota ' ei�3h:s P. d. Mendota He{ght�. >MI! 551Y0 Copyright 2006 Lwonard _Amps, Archtr .. P.A. Project Designer: R=N R. Drawn By, BJP. Checked By. LL/LML Revisions 10.02.0E ISSUED SITE PLAN Sheet Number 1 Project No. 060602-1 N89'02'30"W NO.24'39”E Ca - CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my supervision and that I am .0 duly registered land surveyor under Minnesota Statutes ecti n 326.02 to Reg. No. 14677 Date. 10-02-06 BUILDING PERMIT 2705 WILLOW DRIVE MEDINA, MINNESOTA Al."1 Engineers • Surveyors ILandscape Architects Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson lie. 75i C hlorktot 700.• DrIv. Eden Prairie, UN 35344-38cat (352) 829-0700 FAX (352) 829-7505 Prof, lin 06-066 Crow by 15 auww by DDT "16 Me 10-02-06 ti LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PART OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 118 NORTH, RANGE 23,'It,rEST, LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 471.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE UNE BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE DEFLECTING LEFT 51'56' A DISTANCE OF 158 FEET TO A POINT 07 CURVE; THENCE ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 500 FEET; f1ND DELTA ANGLE OF 22'42' A DISTANCE OF 198.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON A UNE TANGENT TO THE END OF LAST SAID 494.2 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE: THENCE ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING. A RADIUS OF 4000 FEET AND DELTA ANGLE OF 5'36' A DISTANCE OF 390.95 t-Lti; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON A. LINE TANGENT TO THE END OF LAST SAID CURVE 190 .EET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, AND THERE ENDING. NOTES 1. This exhibit woe completed without the benefit of title work the legal description shown is based on Hennepin County Tax Assessor Records. 2. The basis of bearings is assumed. 3. The area of the properly described above is 767.519 square feet or 17.63 acres. 4. The wetlands depicted on this drawing were extropoiated from a document provided by the City of Medina without benefit of field verification or measurement. 5. The Impervious areas are as follows for the site. old born 1.532 sq. ft. existing drive 8,329 sq. ff.. concrete around pool and house 3,815 sq. ft., Flagstone wolkwoy 735 sq. ft., tennis court 5,460 sq. ft.. existing house 3,269 sq. ft. and deck/porch 577 sq. ft., for an existing coverage of 18,257 sq. ft., and the propoied •with be proposed barn of 7,200 sq. ft., proposed concrete of 6,385 sq. ft., proposed drive of 2,252 sq. ft.:for a proposed coveroge of 38.052 sq. ft. 6. Septic site shown for reference only, site must be approved by city prior to construction. 7. Unadjusted earthwork estimates Cut-300 cubic yards and FOI-1300 cubic yards. PE-- 71.1E ------ _ pLi7_ F 41'41S -194 2 1324.79 -- 09 LEGEND •oa TREE UNE DECIDUOUS TREE tom_ r oo.00 I CONIFEROUS TREE PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION — • — • — WETLAND 0 0 0 0 SILTFENCE Y1'.• 4, N., -Pe. Scale in feet 0 40 80 120 N N N NN. x 'N, N 5.-0" DOOR & FRAME SCHEDULE DR.s DCOR SIZE THICK DOOR FRAME REMARKS 100A 12-0"x12'-C" - C - INSU_ATED 100B S-0"x7'-0" 1 3/4" A Fl Hsu _ATED 100C 12'-0"x12'-C" - C - INSU_ATED 1000 3'-0"x7'-0" 1 3/4" A F1 INSULATED 101 3'-0"x7'-0" 1 3/4" A F1 102 2'-6"x6'-8" 1 3/8" B F2 103 3'-0"x7'-0" 1 3/4" A 1,1 104 3'-0"x7'-0" 1 3./4" A F7 105A 3'-0"x7.-0" 1 3/4" A F7 INSU_ATED 105E 2'-0"x2'-0" - - - INSU_ATED; VERIFY DOOR. & FRAME W/ G.C. 106 (7) 4'-0"x8'-0" 1 3/4" A F4 200 (2) 4' 0"xe 0" 1 3/4" A F4 201 3.-0"x6'-8" 1 3/8" B F3 (A ( D ( i 1) 3.-4" F1 PAINTALD FOLLOW METE i V 2'-iG 03 1 io Fl PAINTED HOLLOW �y METAL DOOR FRAME TYPES f /- 3•-C: : -- -_ r . PAINTED HOLLOW METAL — -- - _ - - - -co eo QPAINTED HOLLOW METAL �J i t� (� PAINALT D HOLLOW MET 2U -0 20 -0 GU -U 2U -U - \ / xI 1 24'-0" UNE OF—. I OVERHANG - -f ABO'JE, TYP. - / q4 _ _- 12'-0" k 3 . ;_ __ r-_. I 5'-4 _ 3'-4 / y t• 15'-4" / SUPPORTED CONC. STOOP �! (TYP.) I \ - i I I f I \ � WI) r\ p I o I 4" 1.1EY. VENEER—, I I W/ 10" MSY. I o III '� I ' 1001j; ! I 100-8: BACK-UR (TYP.) I + J l I >: I I tZ (12' { -------- ( I o 1.,d' M� ;r \ I _I LEY I 2'-6 9.-4 I ! -' "HORSE a STA.I 1 (3 THUS)I a,1 I - TRENCH CENTERED DRAINI AT III l r ; I ti L O.H. )DOR 1 _ ^ � I 1 \ `" — \ _ in _ _ - - I v � Cl—�r i�,-1, � I N I‘ --VERIFY STALL an CDNST. W/ " GEN. CONTD. 10" MSY. I 11 II _ yny nj �i an HORSE a STORAGE 1�j1 `Y c \ BARN 106 r26 RISERS 0 4 i� I 16.-2 1/4" A4 m i ...Ali VERIFY CDNST. I TYPE Wj G.C. 1 B _O" A3 �^ r8" MSY , I Al,FINISHED FL00P. EL. 100-0° BATHP.M.- -. \ 9 -2 V - \ I STAIR. 1102 , . O \ 9� iv i e 105 :CHICKEN I ' I L 7 J' I 11 f UTIUT'f c 000OP o l• a (i05 >I1051 I I I I I UP Q' III 26R io I I II f ROOM I 101 :V \ 1 \ o`.I a I \ - '-2'-0"x2.-0" DOOR. ® 12" A.F.F.I- U 04..,' ,. I 0 - v \ 8" --. t, \1 MS". (702;� I in m I Di;: SINK-.......,, —. N c \ (W1 I �� —10" MSY. �^� , I ASHIW3 , <\ STORAGE 11, ,\ 03;+ � SINK 'GARDEN TUB r aiiil I 8 MS . ROOM ,j)E.,o 11 rm.,. \ \ a, o ¢ L I I �--- \ "I vA I <v I - - _ of — �- "` I o \ C) I \ . I tr \ o G I I `* \ 0A3-Jjlto °0 =I o WORK BENCH ' i I N o I \ r 1 I o \ wt I I 4-BASE & ttr In \ 1 I C(oo� I �) UPPER ,1 CABS L _i .1 \, .. , \ \ L d. .i -4" ` • _ 5'-4., / 12Y O" _ /` - 24'-0" ..laTH ,,i R \LINE OF OYERFiANG ABOVE. TYP Y �" —0" 1...// -4" / 5'-d" I FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/6" =, 1'-0" e WOOD, SOLID CORE. OAK, STAINED SEALED & VARNISHED, FLUSH DOOR —YPES WINDOW TYPES L"1 FIRST BOOR �r 1 CVERHEAD DOOR W1 GLASS BLOCK SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4; = 'TEMPERED GLASS i c � 80,_0" 2O-0" ? n f 1 ANGLE TO MATCH PITCH OF ROOF TRUSS FIRST FLOOR 60'-0" GLASS BLOCK MAN�KYUUF. WGHT, / 71FYC. T 30.-0" 30.-0" C 0 b 0 I m r o I A STORAGE 201 h FIKISHED FLOOR C� EL. = 116,-2 1/4" i-I II r = - I I I I I WOOD TRUSS WALL & FRAMING, VERIFY DESIGN W/ TRUSS MANUFACTURER =_ 201.5 SATE, G.C. TO VERIFY DESIGN DN I' W/ OWNER 26R: L!L J 6 I n © \ \ 1 LINE OF BLK. WALL BELCW C-0" VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF. SKYLIGHT ABOVE (4-1-IUS) RECREATION ROOM 12001 FINISHED FLOOR EL. = 11C-2 ./4" NOTE: VERIFY ATTIC ACCESS LOCATION W/ G.C. & OWNER WOOD TRUSS WALL — & FRAMING, VERIFY DESIGN W/ TRUSS MANUFACTURER 6'-0" _ . VERIFY W/ TRUSS M.ANLIF. ;t L H OH -BAY GLASS-, BLOCK WDW. AT NORTH & SOUTH WALLS (2 THUS V)� J 30'-0" 30'-0" }�pR'f t5 SECOND FLOOR PLAN /� SCALE: 1 /8" - 1'-0" ; '12;7 LAMPERT ARCHITECTS 13837 NE Lincoln Street Ham Lake. MN 55304 nil Phone:763.755.17.11-ax:763.757.2840 I o m pe rlein mpart-areh.eo m ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPCRT WAS PREPAREE. BY ME DR UNDER MY 0 P.ECT SUP,RVISIUN AND IHAI I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCH TECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 'cr.nr w_ LEONARD IAMPERT PP t. 13669 :i;Srl�E 10.02.06 U+1E Phone 651 661-0200 Fax 651) 661-0235 •*•, �usy�, RjRyan Construction, Inc. 110C Manacle Heights Rd. Mereota Heights. MN 55120 2705 Willow Drive, Medina Copyright maa L"cnvrd La-np"rl Arch lacla, F.t. Project Designer: BEN R. Drown By. MJG, BJR Checked By. LL/LML Revisions 1 C.02.06 ISSUED FLOOR PLANS Sheet Number Project No. 060602-1 PRF FAR. DFCORATIVI, ARCH LOUVER, WHITE COLOR TO MATCH EX STING HOUSE (10 TOP- OF ROOF EL = 142'-3"t JAMES HARD E BRAND SIDING, BOARD & BATTEN STYLE, UGH YELLOW COLOR TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE WALL MOUNTED DOWNCA.ST LIGHT FIXTURE JAMES HARDIE BRAND TRIM BOARDS, WHITE COLOR. TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE 2HDFL1O16' EL. OR -2 1 /4" DECORATIVE CARRIAGE LANTERNS TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE 1� j ARCH. CONC. BLK. VENEER W/ 10" CONC. BLK,. BACK-UP (TYP.) FINISHED FLOOR EL . = 10C h TOF OF FOOTING C� EL. = 96'-6" TOP OF ROOF EL. = 11V-3"t 1-0 2ND FLOOR. FINISHED FLOOR L. = 00 -0 AL TOP OF FOOTING EL - 1 I �- - I I i. I F LH -Li- I iJ1 _—�� 1� 1 I � — 1 r 1 JI�71I h1( I --I 'II- I �l �1 ! --L +- - I ----� -1 I N I —I I I I JAMES HARDIE BRAND - TRIM BOARDS, WHITE COLOR TO MATCH EXIST. H:H1S. 6'-0"x6'-0" SKl'UGHT (4 THUS) 3'-0"x7.-0" NSL'L-- HOLLOW MTL. MAK DOOR ,& FRAME (3 THUS) BURGUNDY COLOR 12'-C x12'-0" !HSU_ OVERHEAD DOOR. (2 THUS) BURGUNDY COLOR 1 1-PREFAB. DECORATIVE CORNICE, WHITE COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE /�, NORTH ELEVATION `• A3 / sCALE: 1/6" _ —o" '1 II 1,1 = —11 11 1 I I r-t rum fiT-'131 Ii II. .. -I I �7=1 II HTh-i 11-1-1.1 8'-0"x8'-0" INSUL. HOLLOW MTL DBL. DOOR & FRAME. BURGUNDY COLOR - I I I=— 1 1 I I ■—I - 1 r 1- - I — - L-i HEAVY DU-Y ASPHALT \\ SH NGLES, MATCH EXIST. HOUSE COLOR. JAMES HARDIE BRAND-. FASCIA BOARDS, WHITE COLOR TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE JAMES HAROIE BRAND TRIM BOARDS, WHITE COLOR. TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE (TYP. AT WOWS. & DOORS) 12"Wx8"H BLK. 16"Wx.8`H , �— - 12"Wx16"1-1 ELK.. f--1 18'Wr12"H ELK. 1 a"Wx."H BLK.. - +� 16"Wx16"H --1 y:o IF!e Ir1r 1 -T _ I J �1 t— A-. ARCH. CONC. BLK.-' 8'-0"x8'-0" INSUL- VENEER W/ 10" CONC. HOLLOW MTL DBL. B_K. BACK-UP, STONE DOOR, & FRAME, CAP TO MATCH EXIST. BURGUNDY COLOR HOUSE (TYP.) -24"YlxB`H BLK. v-16"Wx24"H BLK. .t -12"Wx.B"H BLK.. .4.-I--16"Wx8"H BLK. -E"Wx12"H BLK. I--16"Wx12"H BLK - NOTE: BLOCK PATTERN ACHIEVED USINC 4" MASTERBLOCK BRAND "SPLYT STONE QUARRY SERIES" ARCHITECTURAL BLK. - 1 MASONRY VENEER PATTERN ts. A3 ! SCP.LEI 1 /4" 1 I 2`1WEST ELEVATION +3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" -WM& c;WEE T /Mall V L. tlt I I I I Miird R.1*E1 et�s�l I- �Eff� = I — DECORATIVE ARCH. COL. TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE `2 THUS. WHITE COLOR TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE aim 4'-0"x4-0" GLASS BLOCK WINDOW (13 THUS) T1 I �( JAMES HARDIE BRAND TRIM BOARDS, WHITE COLOR TO MATCH EXIST. HOLSE SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" - '`-0" T- 1 1 I IT I ME'= 11111411Ea11 IN51151 M11 :111 I I T 1-1i 1 II �—T —T H- Tl P- lI I i MVO tritirVe ETIMEZ T� —1--7 � -1 —I,=1i Et, rr � 1 Hi 1 - I -_-1 -driftlifil WIWI 1- I - 1 I I rn irr unto, s1o$$�I — IIL— r I _ 1T--1 1 T J. EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/6" - 1`-0" • LAMPERT ARCHITECTS 13837 NE Lincoln Street Ham Lake. MN 55304. 1E1 Phene:763.755.1211 =0x:763.757.2849 lampereebmparl—arah.co m ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPAP.E] SY ME OR UNDER MY O R.ECT SUPERVISION ARO IHA.I I AM A DULY UCENSED ARCH TECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE eTTaa..,TT'E�/O,rP MIlIVESOTti f 0 i-Yf�•'+Y'd SCr."IUP= LEOPARD LAMPERT PPh `!•aE 13569 O;�KE 10.02.06 ULIE Phone (651) 681-0200 Fog (651) 681-0235 RjRyon Construction, Inc. 1 iO_ uonacta Heighta Rd. Merdota Helght4 MN 55120 I�leil U C ! LLI d r� C J a® P f M a ct -0 5 o IU r� Cop}righl 2006 Lacnord Lc-np"rl Archlocic, P.L. Project Designer. DEN R Drawn By. MJG, BJR Checked By. LL/LML Revisions 1 C.02.06 ISSUED ELEV ATIONS Sheet Number 1 A3 Project No. 060602-1 joiBonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects November 21, 2006 Ms. Rose Lorsung City Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Hamel, Minnesota 55340 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 551 1 3 Office: 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1 31 1 www.bonestroo.com Re: CUP — 2705 Willow Drive BRA File No. 000190-06000-1 Plat No. 406 Dear Rose, We have reviewed the revised plans for the proposed building at 2705 Willow Drive, dated October 26, 2006. The proposal is to build a residential out -building and add an additional access from Willow Drive. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters: • It appears that access to the proposed building can be provided from the existing driveway. Therefore, we do not recommend a second access off Willow Drive be provided. • The city should consider requesting that the applicant provide a 33 foot right of way along Willow Drive. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (651) 604-4894. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Darren Amundsen Cc: Tom Kellogg Bonestroo recently merged with DSU, brinijng together sane of the best regional tarts in sneering, architecture, planning, landscape architecture, and urban design. O,r carbined team now prot4des integrated services in one organization. ■ St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN • Milwaukee, WI ■ Chicago, IL Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission, through City Administrator Chad Adams FROM: Rose Lorsung, City Planner DATE OF REPORT: December 4, 2006 DATE OF MEETING: December 12, 2006 RE: Rising Sun Memorial Park Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit DEADLINE: February 7, 2007 Extended by Applicant 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant, Richard Gay, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit and a Site Plan to operate a cemetery located at 3365 State Highway 55. The property is 28.13 acres in size, is zoned Rural Residential and guided Rural Residential which does allow a cemetery under a conditional use. This request does require a public hearing and the City routed 1000 feet around the site for notification of the meeting this evening. 2. HISTORY AND REVIEW TIMELINE A. History The City received the original plans on June 6, 2006 and began the statutory fifteen day review of the land use application. Upon review of the application and the ordinance language for the review of such a request, the City began the process of updating the ordinance. The application did trigger the investigation of the ordinance as the City hadn't applied the ordinance to any other request for cemetery creation in many years. After over a month of research by staff on the Development Review Committee, the City presented the research and a draft version of the new ordinance to the Planning Commission on July 11, 2006 for review. After much deliberation, the Planning Commission recommended additional research to be done and another review which did take place on August 8, 2006 (minutes from both meetings attached for review). The City Council then reviewed the recommendations and minutes from both Planning Commission meetings on August 15, 2006 and September 5, 2006 (minutes attached for review). The end result of the last Council meeting was the adoption of a new ordinance for review of Conditional Use Permits for cemeteries. This ordinance was not only for this particular land use application but also for the existing cemeteries in the city. The final ordinance is as follows, I left in the changes so you can see how it progressed: (d) cemeteries: (i) minimum lot area of ten acres; Rising Sun Memorial Park 2 [November 14, 2006 Planning Commission] (ii) located with direct access to a collector or arterial roadway as identified in the comprehensive plan; (iii) all roadways within the cemetery must be paved and 20 feet wide unless the city determines that a wider road is necessary for public safety; (iv) direct views from all adjoining residential parcels must be screened by appropriate means; (v) buildings, parking areas, mausoleums, columbariums and upright grave markers that exceed 24 inches in height must be set back a minimum of 50 feet from all property lines; (vi) all improvements, including grave sites, must be set back a minimum of 50 feet from all wetlands; (vii) established and operated in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 306 and or 307, as amended; and (viii) sufficient maintenance and perpetual care funds as required by Minnesota Statutes Chapters 306 or 307 shall be established; (ix) an underground sprinkler system that has the capability to water all vegetation within the cemetery shall be required; 0_0 monuments or markers within a cemetery shall be placed as shown on the cemetery's master plan or as directed by the city; (xi) mausoleums shall not exceed 30 feet in height and monuments shall not exceed 10 feet in height, with height measured as it is for buildings; (xii) monuments and markers shall be constructed of natural stone, but no monument or marker shall be constructed of limestone, sandstone or anv other type of stone that will not maintain relative permanency; (xiii) monuments and markers shall be structurally sound and be placed upon foundations of solid masonry at a depth and size so as to assure no settling or movement of the marker or monument; (xiv) concrete aprons at least four inches in width that are level with the ground shall be placed around monuments and be affixed to them so as to prevent grass, weeds or other vegetation from growing in between the monuments and aprons; (xv) a site plan acceptable to the city council must be submitted and reviewed under the city's site plan ordinance; (xvi) a master plan for the build -out of the property which includes the number and location of all burial lots; the phasing of selling/filling the burial lots; Rising Sun Memorial Park 3 [November 14, 2006 Planning Commission] the assigned numbers for the burial lots; descriptions and locations of any other improvements to be located on the property; and a description of the cemetery's records retention system must be submitted and approved by the city council; (xvii) ground water tests shall be performed prior to city council approval in order to determine high water tables and any springs located on the site; (xviii) the city council may require a transportation plan that includes traffic management for burials, funerals and burial site visits; (xix) the city council may require an environmental assessment of the proposed use; (xx) in addition to the requirements set forth in this provision, the city council may require compliance with any other conditions, restrictions or limitations regarding the type, location, size, material, number, the manner of placement and installation, and removal of monuments, markers, mausoleums, columbariums and plantings that are permitted within the cemetery it deems to be reasonably necessary to protect the residential character of the neighborhood. B. Review Timeline The applicant has given the City an extension for the review of the application which will run out on February 7, 2007. The reason staff is highlighting this is that there will need to be a sufficient amount of time for the review. There are two months of possible meetings left within this timeframe to review the application through both the Planning Commission and City Council. The City Council will have to take action on this application at their meeting on February 6, 2007 in order to meet the extended deadline. 3. REVIEW AGENCIES This application, especially being on a public water and state highway, has several agencies reviewing it for permitting. The city has multiple staff reviewing and the other agencies include the Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Pioneer - Sarah Watershed District, and because of the wetland impacts proposed, several other agencies will have to provide a technical review of the impacts upon receipt of the permit for the work. 4. CONTEXT A. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making: Site Plan and CUP The City has a relatively low level of discretion in approving or denying Site Plans and Conditional Use Permits. The proposed zoning and use of the property must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. In granting a conditional use permit, the Medina City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of occupants or surrounding lands. Rising Sun Memorial Park 4 [November 14, 2006 Planning Commission] B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The site is zoned Rural Residential. The adjacent properties to the east, west and south are also Rural Residential. The properties to the immediate north over Highway 55 are Rural Commercial Holding. C. Surrounding Neighbors: Impact The last condition of the ordinance for Conditional Use Permits for cemeteries describes additional reasonable conditions as they pertain to the, "residential character of the neighborhood." Additional conditions should be formulated from this context. D. Natural Characteristics of Site The site has significant natural features including Peter Lake and its surrounding wetlands and marshes. The topography of the site is typical of a property near a water basin and has steep slopes near the water and around the west and south side of the property. These two sides are very steep traveling up towards the south and west side and are much flatter near the center of the site and low near the lake. The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System data shows swamps, marshes and some mixed scrub trees throughout the southwest corner of the site and in between those features are emergent grasses and mixed disturbed vegetation. Because of the natural sloping nature of the property, an argument could be made (in keeping with the residential character condition) to tier the height of monuments from lesser to greater with the change in grade going down toward the lake, this will be an item of consideration for recommendation. 5. ANALYSIS: Site Plan Review A. General Notes The site plan shows burial sites, Mausoleum Crypts and Niches, Columbarium, Private Estates and Pet Burial areas. There is also a memorial garden, walking paths, house converted to main office, maintenance shed and two sign areas. The developer stated in the previous letter to the City that there are a total of 8,000 burial sites, 1,440 Mausoleum Crypts and 7,500 Columbarium Cremation Niches for a total of 16,940 sites. The new letter says there will be 7000 burial lots, 7,500 cremation niches, 2,500 mausoleum crypts and 46 private estates for a total of 17,046 sites, an increase of 106 sites. Staff still finds some discrepancies between the applicant's letter and the site plan but they are minor. The true number of sites will be a part of the final master plan and will be final. The master plan will also include the exact building envelope for buildings, phasing of the improvements and timeline for construction which is outlined in the applicant's recent letter. The developer did not provide a color rendering of the new site plan so staff prepared one for review to see the changes, see next page. The site plan now shows the 50-foot wetland buffer and area where upright markers over 24" are prohibited. The site plan also has been updated with the new location of the pet burials and the amount of parking that could be allowed on the shoulder of the internal roadways which is shown as 90 spaces. Rising Sun Memorial Park 5 [November 14, 2006 Planning Commission] The City also needs a septic design for the secondary site and a report on the current system to ensure compliance. The property is in the RR Zoning and that impervious maximum is 50%, but the property also falls in the Shoreland Overlay District which has a maximum of 25% impervious surfaces. The site plan currently shows the impervious as 10.6% which is in compliance. The City asks that the Site Plan is relabeled with the correct impervious maximum. Building Elevations and Materials There are five buildings proposed for the site and all of the structures except the house will be taken down. The elevations are included in the packet for review. The elevation of the largest building is not provided and will need to be reviewed for size, materials and building height. All structures will have to follow the newly -adopted ordinance for setbacks and height. The City requires that in the next submittal, elevations for all the proposed structures are submitted. Due to the visibility of the project and structures from Highway 55 and nearby residential neighbors, staff suggests incorporating architectural guidelines, similar to that in the commercial or PUD districts that describe types of materials, their percentage of the structure and prohibited materials. Setbacks The house does not meet the setback of 50 feet for all sides. This is an existing house however and may be grandfathered in for the requirement. The old setback was 20 feet which they do meet (25 feet from the side lot line). The new 50 foot setback from lot lines for all structures is being followed with this site plan with the exception of the entry monument and sign which is around 5 feet off the property line near Highway 55. The other setback in question from the last submittal was the 50 foot wetland setback. The applicant may also need to get a variance from the wetland setback for the new road that does fall within the setback area in four locations. MnDOT has been reviewing the application for the highway improvements as well as the setback for burials on the north side of the property due to the widening of the highway in the future. The attached memo outlines the need to purchase the 50 most northerly feet of the property to expand the highway. This would leave the burials right up to the new future roadway. Because of this, the City can require a 100 foot setback for all burials from the north side of the lot. Landscaping/Tree Preservation The site shows minimal formal landscaping for a cemetery. The property does have some tree areas that are not going to be disturbed for this project but a cemetery generally has quite a bit of formal landscaping. There will be some tree loss (101 caliper inches) mainly for the construction of the private road. The City doesn't have any landscaping requirements for a residential Site Plan other than those used for screening and staff will recommend additional screening and berming as necessary. The City does have a tree replacement ordinance but the removal of trees for a street and driveway (and under 1 acre in size) are exempted and therefore the applicant does not have to mitigate the tree loss unless the City Council authorizes this. The plan does show some mitigation of the trees but they are the ones generally used for screening and entry. This has been updated since the last set of plans. The area near Highway 55 has and additional 5 Summit Ash deciduous trees, the internal site along the roadway has 8 additional Red Oak, and the west property line shows 7 Arborvitae shrubs and 3 Red Oak moved closer to the north along Rising Sun Memorial Park 6 [November 14, 2006 Planning Commission] the property line, and the south property line has 14 Black Hills Spruce which is a replacement of the 3 Emerald Queen Maples. Wetland Assessment/Impacts There is a significant contiguous wetland on the site from Peter Lake. The applicant had the wetland delineated and updated on the survey and site plan for review. The boundary was approved by the City's wetland scientist per the Wetland Conservation Act and the City Council determined that there should be a 50-foot setback for all structures from wetlands. The wetland buffer areas will require a planting schedule and the grading plan should show this area as included for easement. Bonestroo has also prepared updated comments on the wetland impacts and has determined that a full wetland permit for impacts must be submitted for review by the City and outside agencies. The City has yet to review the permit. Engineering: Drainage/Grading/Transportation The applicant has provided a geotechnical report for review and the City has commented that there may be areas of perched groundwater throughout the site. The City will need more information detailing what steps will be taken when groundwater is encountered. After consideration of the site and the comments already provided by MnDOT for the entrance, staff did not feel as though a transportation study needed to be performed at this site. Similarly, staff did not feel that an environmental study was needed as the applicant provided the geotechnical report and the wetland delineation as well as the receipt of preliminary approvals from the DNR. On the most recent submittal, the applicant is showing storm water treatment including a rainwater garden with a planting schedule. The recent plan also shows a temporary sediment trap and excess soil area. This was a recommendation by the Watershed. This area will need to be in compliance with the City Code for Storm Water Management at all times. Pioneer -Sarah Watershed District and DNR (Shoreland Overlay District) The Pioneer -Sarah Watershed District has finished the preliminary review of the project. The attached memo, dated October 17, 2006, from the watershed illustrates the Storm Water Improvements needed that the developer has implemented in this recent set of plans. The watershed also pointed out the pet cemetery in the buffer and agreed with the City's recommendation to remove that. Tom Hovey with the DNR, assisted the developer using aerial imagery to try and identify the Ordinary High Water Level. The rough estimate is 964.14 for this public water basin. Peter Lake, 27-147P, is a RD Recreational Development lake in the Shoreland Overlay District. The lot width requirement at the Ordinary High Water Level is 150 feet and the structure setbacks are 75 feet from this mark. Using the rough estimate, this appears to be in compliance with the ordinance requirements. The City will require the Ordinary High Water Level to be established by the DNR for this basin for the master plan to ensure that the setbacks are clearly delineated. Lighting This property is in Zone El of the city's lighting ordinance. This is an area with intrinsically dark landscapes. This zone includes rural areas, including rural residential areas, where preservation of natural darkness has been identified as a high priority. The ordinance doesn't have any standards for residential lighting. The Site Plan ordinance requires a lighting plan and Rising Sun Memorial Park 7 [November 14, 2006 Planning Commission] the applicant has provided one that shows some new lighting at the site and the foot candles, but the footcandle measurements on the site plan near the entrance are not readable, the City requests the font to be greater. The applicant doesn't show any lighting near the entrance sign area. The plans shall be updated to show additional lighting if implemented in this area. Parking There are not any ordinance requirements for parking for a cemetery. There are 17 parking stalls shown at the site including one handicap stall. The applicant states that there is room for 90 vehicles parked at the shoulder of the roadway throughout the site. The City still would like more information about the Qing of the processions, especially if there is more than one at a time or an overlap of processions or events at the site. There will not be enough room to accommodate this amount of traffic and the only ingress/egress at the site is the main entrance on Highway 55, for which there isn't room to stack vehicles. Access/Service Road/Fire Access The development of a cemetery will cause the access area on State Highway 55 to be improved. MnDOT has weighed in on this development and all the correspondence and recommended specifications are attached for your review. MnDOT has given the applicant two choices for the improvements related to the left and right turns into the site and the City engineer also needs to approve the improvements to not only the entrance but throughout the site. The submittal before this one showed a private road through the site ending in a cul-de-sac. The Fire Marshal wrote a memo to the applicant detailing why this was a poor design and thusly the site plan now shows the drive as a 24-foot wide loop road. The applicant letter says that the Fire Marshal requires a 28-foot loop road, which may or may not be an error. The road will also have to be designed to a 9-ton standard for the entire loop to ensure that emergency vehicles can utilize it. When funeral processions come through they will have to pull over to one side to allow for a fire truck to navigate through the site in case of an emergency. The city will also take an easement over this area and will post one side as no parking fire lane (see attached memo from Fire Marshal). The City may also condition the roadway to be wider to accommodate two-way traffic and shoulder parking. Signage There are two proposed sign areas for the site. The detail of the front entrance is found on the last sheet of the submittal with the pictures of the site and typical monuments and structures. The scale on the drawing equates to roughly 32 square feet of signage on the north side of the property abutting Highway 55. The site plan however shows in print that there is additional signage inside the entrance for which we do not have any details. The sign at the main entrance is in the 50-foot setback, and possibly in the 100-foot setback that may be required. Trash Enclosure The site now shows a trash enclosure that is adjacent to the maintenance building. The city will need to see the elevation of this structure and the materials, which should be consistent with the maintenance building. Additional Items: Easements Rising Sun Memorial Park 8 [November 14, 2006 Planning Commission] The city will require easements over areas of drainage and utility, wetlands and buffers and roadway areas for the entire site. The City will need the legal descriptions from the applicant's surveyor for all easements for the property as part of the approvals. The City is in the process of reviewing the title work for the property for consideration of the easements. There are two easements that show up as recorded against the property and only one is shown on the survey. The city will need the survey updated to reflect both easement areas. 6. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that this set of plans dated November 27, 2006 be brought forward to the City Council at its first meeting in January. Staff further recommends that the following topics be discussed for possible inclusion as conditions, especially as they related to the residential character of the neighborhood and public health and safety: • Increase roadway width to accommodate two-way traffic and shoulder parking • prohibiting use of the easement to the lake on the south side of the property • access for funeral procession being only on Highway 55 and not through the residential area • the proximity to the cemetery and proposed burials as they are within 50 feet of two residential backyards (staff proposes a 100 foot setback on the north, west and south sides for burials -not headstones but rather bodies) • The future expansion of Trunk Highway 55 and the permanent land use. The requirement of 100 foot setback on the north side for burials would solve this issue. Burials right up to a 50-foot setback would prohibit any work by MnDOT in this area for future improvements (grading etc) • screening • proximity to the residential wells • requirements for sprinkling that doesn't use city water • hours of operation • prohibition of future crematorium • the scattering of ashes • density of the proposed buildings all with immediate proximity to the resident to the west's backyard o change in monument height with the change in topography less to greater moving towards the lake, building envelope detailing areas that will allow certain building heights The following conditions relate to the overall project at this time: 1. The entry monument and sign near Highway 55 shall be moved to meet the 50- 100 foot setback from property line. 2. The elevations of all proposed buildings shall be shown as well as the building materials. 3. The Ordinary High Water Level must be field established and surveyed by the DNR for this basin for the master plan to ensure that the setbacks are clearly delineated. Rising Sun Memorial Park 9 [November 14, 2006 Planning Commission] 4. The existing septic system and secondary location designs should be submitted to the City for review and compliance. 5. Additional screening by way of fence or berming and additional landscaping shall be shown in all areas with proximity to residential single-family homes. 6. The trees used for screening shall be evaluated for height and caliper inches. 7. The landscaping plan shall be updated to show the planting schedule for the wetland buffer with a recommended MnDOT seed mix. 8. The lighting plan shall be updated with a larger font to show the foot candles clearly. 9. Proof of parking shall be shown on the site plan so as to accommodate any future parking issues that may arise. 10. The private road will require a 9-ton design standard for the entire loop to ensure that emergency vehicles can utilize it. 11. The easement plan shall be updated to include the internal roadway. 12. The City will need more information detailing what steps will be taken when groundwater is encountered during excavation of the site. 13. The SWPPP plan shall be updated to show the future use of the excess soil area. 14. The City shall implement architectural guidelines for structures. 15. The final master plan shall show the total number of burials, the delineated setbacks, phasing of improvements and building envelope for all structures at a minimum. 16. A letter of credit for an amount approved by the City engineer for the site improvements shall be required. 17. A separate escrow shall be required for City construction maintenance. 18. A development agreement prepared by the City shall be required. 19. A separate easement agreement, drafted by the City, shall be required. 20. All legal descriptions of easements shall be submitted to the City in Microsoft Word format and approved by the City. 21. All final conditions of the City shall be requirements for the development. 22. All final conditions of the Fire Marshal and Building Inspector shall be requirements for the development. 23. All final conditions of the Minnesota Department of Transportation shall be requirements for the development which will include a permit and financial guarantee for the construction. 24. All final conditions of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources shall be requirements for the development. 25. All final conditions of the Pioneer -Sarah Watershed District shall be requirements for the development. 26. All final conditions of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency shall be requirements for the development including a permit for the grading. 27. The applicant shall pay to the City all fees associated with the review of the Conditional Use Permit application. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Development Plans dated November 27, 2006 RISING SUN MEMORIAL PARK WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLE, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. s m �s Schnell Madson Planning Engineering Surveying MEDINA, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR RICHARD G. GAY 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 T 763-746-1600 F 763-746-1699 554 Third Street NW, Suite 100 Elk River, Minnesota 55330 T 763-241-0108 F 763-241-8351 www.schoellmadson.com SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION TTL TITLE SHEET L1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS / SURVEY L2.0 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN L3.0 SITE LAYOUT PLAN L3.1 SITE LIGHTING PLAN L4.0 SITE GRADING PLAN L4.1 SITE DRIVEWAY PROFILE L5.0 SITE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PLAN L5.1 SWPPP PLAN L6.0 SITE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN L6.1 SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGED L7.0 SITE & UTILITY DETAILS L8.0 SITE PICTURES AND SOILS MAP A1.0 GARDEN MAUSOLEUM PLAN A1.1 MAINTENANCE BUILDING PLAN PROJECT LOCATION NDENCE ,236 LORETT 2000 POP. 570 MEDINA 2000 ` `POP. 4,005 i MEDINA 2000 POP. 4,005 s © 2006 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. 0 11-06-2006 moo • co m aQ 12. r t r tt � � N r m c N U Hopkins, MN 55343 ♦ N s t �W 1- W I y coW >. J v ib H N N s ♦ PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMMORIAL PARK 15050 23rd Avenue North ti LO LO O cn �o CE co G 7 T = ~ O co >, N- O_I— F 763-746-1699 0 M M LO 0 cn L Y w c O CO a, w a) 0 U LO M N ch CO IJ- co 0 0 N co CO ti .schoellmadson.com 111 E T m T cu ci m L_ r= y Q COQ 7 U Y al=1 Cr/� 1 1 1 1 Cip .� .,.., Cl.) o a� � :' 734 .4 = T CD � 1 �1 r In LCD 1 1 _� ;I `;I I I SMI Project Number: 64477-001 ) E \ - I • { • 1 r' ,/ I /N / N; I I I/ f � '/ I I I i 1 1 I TT}' 1 %\ 1 X \\.. 1 • •- ` • •\ • ` \ m • �• •• � `• •N \ •• ‘ `��� • • ` ` `` `` • `• � \ \ • • ♦ ...--� \ •• •.... • • i� • -- \ ` ` ` \\\ // •• \ / \ \ `` / • 1 \ \ / / / z / / / !i "-£ • 1 ` ` \�Y rf i. ' 1 / �\ '` / j / / ` fJ ff / / / ' `• — — _ — — — _ — ' , ` ff ff /' ' •-- / 1 \ — / �% I , .o Y »' - , ❑ �� _ 2 i_ / \ __ V 3 - 2f o .o .o .o .o .o � Io *�\` � § �,�ij A A A AA A A A A A .o o o .o .o .o o o .o N#o .o �o ,g ,g ,g ,g ,g o o o o o .o 000 000o000 o► .o 2.o 2.o 2 2.o 2.2 .a ._ .o .o .o .o .o 1 q22 .o � .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .� .o .o 2 2 2.o jo .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o .o f.f tf o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fff I.o tf .o .o .o .o .o .o .o _ o .o .o .o 2.o .o f 1 o $ f,� I ALD,Inc, ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING DESIGNS,INC, 2920 ANTHONY LANE ST, ANTHONY, MN 55418 612-252-4100, 612-252-4141 fax CONTACT: SC❑TT HARMES TYPE A CUTOFF SH❑EB❑X 3' CONCRETE BASE TYPE B SIGN LIGHT w/Barn Doors 0' CONCRETE BASE TYPE C FLAG POLE LIGHT 0' CONCRETE BASE TYPE W SHED SECURITY LIGHT MTD 8,5' HIGH, FULL CUT❑FF, FIXTURES MUST BE: Filename: G:\Server1\CAD\SC❑TT\Schoell\Sunrise Memorial Garden for Jim K\JIM1 K,A32 Pro ject: All Pro jects Date:10/17/2006 Qty Label Symbol Description Lumens LLF Filename 1 A -3£- EMC❑ AVA-1-3-250HPS-VOLT-BRP/SSS25-5-11-D1-BRP (3' BASE) 29000 0.800 AVA325H,ies 2 B GARDC❑ DF7-ST-HFL-150MH-V❑LT=BRP (ground mtd) 12500 0,700 G7HF17M,ies . > 1 C ® GARDC❑ DF7-ST-NSP-150MH-V❑LT=BRP (ground mtd) 12500 0.700 G7NS17M,ies 1 W - GARDC❑ 101-WT-100HPS-VOLT-BRP Wall Mtd at 8,5' high 9500 0,800 M1F15H,ies Numeric Summary Pro ject: All Pro jects Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Shed Area Illuminance Fc 0,30 17,8 0,0 Parking Area Illuminance Fc 0.23 4.2 0.0 Sign 1 Illuminance Fc 0.41 129 0.0 �. .o o'"z}"k "fie "fF`, y� .6 0 o ^ - .��] .o .o .o .o .o �. ('y4 � L 4 � .o .o .- o .o .o .o .o .o .c o .o 0 0 .o ® .a2 2 2 .a trt MAINTAINED LIGHT LEVELS AT 0' HIGH, FIXTURES MUST BE WHAT IS SHOW ON PLAN. DISCLAIMER This lighting plan specifies luminaires supplied by ALD. Any deviation from this plan or use of luminaires other than ALD products will require full submittal of fixture sample, drawings, and lighting plan to city, engineer and landscape architect for prior approval. These calculations are NOT valid for owner or city approval using any "non-ALD represented product" or fixtures not shown on this plan. Fixtures must be provided by ALD. Calculations have been performed with our best interpretation of the details given to us. Some differences between measured and calculated results may occur due to intolerances in calculation methods, testing procedures, component performance, measurement techniques and field conditions such as voltage, temperature variations, lamp manufacturer variations, and other variables. Calculations do not take into consideration ob jects such as, but not limited to, trees, buildings, pavement, sidewalk, or cars. Calculation values represent horizontal (i.e. light meter facing straight up) illuminance FC levels (unless otherwise noted). If the real environment conditions do not match the input data, differences will occur between measured values and calculated values. ALD is not responsible for acquiring or interpreting any local lighting codes. These lighting calculations are not a substitute for independent engineering analysis by a professional engineer. Luminaire Location Summary Pro ject: All Pro jects SegNo Label Z Tilt 1 A 28 0 2 B 0,5 45 3 B 0.5 45 4 C 0,5 180 5 W 8.5 0 SCALE 50 100 150 p 2006 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. • 0 11-06-2006 ♦♦ Hopkins, MN 55343 N U ♦ • CITY SUBMITTAL H N s SITE LIGHTING PLAN • PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMORIAL PARK 15050 23rd Avenue North ti to 0 cn co CD �7 = ti O co >, � 0 H F 763-746-1699 O c) cM L.r) cts co Y W c.s^ L 0 a) w 0 U •g ci)CL F 763-241-8351 co 0 O CV M CO ti li- .schoellmadson.com 111 E ♦ • onQ � a) C rn a) T m m -a) a) v = CI CI U r=1 up I u? I I cn 7d , +% . -.4 •o Fil - rl a4 a o Up + a :' +, t) .,.., = aG. T. :� � U M � � Q 1 I I r2 LCZ LCD C\2 1 C\2 1 in 1 1 � � ii 7 P4 = az az SOLID HATCHED AREA DENOTES EXISTING HWY. 55 ROADWAY, DARKER LINES DENOTES PROPOSED BYPASS IMPROVEMENTS. EXISTING CENTERLINE EXISTING DRIVEWAY kOPOSED HIGHWAY 55 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PER MNDOT SP'CIFICATIONS x BYBASS LANE EXISTING DRIVEWAY 1 1 ®1 550 +/— f$ 1 BURIAL SITES =�t URN LANE/ 1 1 0© 6 ROPOSED PAR K I G STALLS WITH 1 ACCESSIBLE STALL ► 1 (TYP.) 1 1 1 • 10' FRONT UTILITY EASEMENT 50' S ETBAC K 2100 +/— BURIAL SITES • • •//�/�,360 1 108 `� ` _ UNITS \�` 5' SIDE UTILITY EASEMENT Toper Sir p BYPASS LANE PER MNDOT STANDARDS '500 BOULDERS \\ DESIGNATED, FOR _yvMEMORIAL HEADSTON S •• �x • •♦ •• ♦` •` ♦`` ♦`` • • 1200 +/— BURIAL SITES 75' HIGH WATER MARK SETBACK \\ • \• 50' WETLAND S ETBAC K igu r : .01 EXISTING GRAVEL PATH CONVERTED TO WALKING PATH FAMILY PLOTS i_=eels •..11 111'0, 4660 EXISTING HOUSE 70' WIDE ELECTRICAL LINE EASEMENT 1000 +/— BURIAL SITES / / 50' WETLAND SETBACK 75' HIGH WATER MARK SETBACK 5' UTILITY EASEMENT 1700 +/— BURIAL SITES All burial plot head stones within 50' of property line will be under a 24" height. 50' SETBACK SCALE SITE NOTES EVERY 3RD ROW OF GRAVES IS TO BE UPRIGHT MONUMENTS, EXCEPT IN AREA ADJACENT TO HIGHWAY 55 AND WITHIN 50' OF THE PROPERTY LINE. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA MINNESOTA SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES. REFER TO CIVIL DETAIL FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE OF BUILDING FACE (TYP.) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES, SUCH AS EXISTING ROADWAY GRADES AT THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS, PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY ry DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. HANDICAPPED PARKING STALLS WILL BE PROVIDED AND IDENTIFIED PER ADA CODES AND LOCATED ON SITE PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION. ALL RADII WILL BE 5.0' UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 10'X20' UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN FOR FOOTCANDLE PRINT OUT. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY TOTAL PLATTED AREA = 28.134 t AC. TOTAL SITE AREA= 15.101 AC. (LESS DELINEATED WETLAND) TOTAL BUILDING AREA= 0.3 AC. TOTAL PAVED AREA= 1.20 AC. (PARKING LOT Sc SIDEWALK) % TOTAL IMPERVIOUS=(0.3+1.20)/15.101=10.6% MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS=25% PARKING SUMMARY: PARKING STALLS PROVIDED 17 (INCLUDING 1 ACCESSABLE STALL) PARKING ALONG ROADWAY(S) 90 SPACES IF PARKED ON ONE SIDE OF ROADWAY SIGN LEGEND: VAN ACCESSIBLE NO PARKING FIRE LANE i z 24" X 24" HIGHWAY REFLECTORIZED STOP SIGN ON POST (R1-1) © 12" X 18" HANDICAPPED PARKING SIGN PER ADA REQUIRMENTS (R7-8a) (IN BOLLARD) © 12" X 6" HANDICAP VAN ACCESS (R7-8b) NO PARKING — FIRE LANE 18" X 12" (RED LETTERS ON WHITE BACKGROUND) PAVING PLAN LEGEND DENOTES HEAVY DUITY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. 2" Mn/DOT 2331 WEARING COURSE 2" Mn/DOT 2331 BASE COURSE 10" CL. 5 GRAVEL (100% CRUSHED QUARRY STONE COMPACTED SUBGRADE DENOTES LIGHT DUITY BITUMINIOUS PAVEMENT 2" Mn/DOT 2331 WEARING COURSE 2" Mn/DOT 2331 BASE COURSE 4" CL. 5 GRAVEL (100% CRUSHED QUARRY STONE) DENOTES NEW CONCRETE WALK & APRON 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4" CONCRETE APRON 2" SAND CUSHION DENOTES ALL BURIAL HEAD STONES WITHIN 50' OF PROPERTY LINE SITE LAYOUT LEGEND 25' HEIGHT +/— EXISTING BUILDING CONVERTED TO AN OFFICE AND OUTFITTED WITH FIRE SPRINKLERS 30' HEIGH MAUSOLEUM WITH CRYPTS AND NICHE 26'-4" HEIGH MAUSOLEUM CRYPT 5' HIGH COLUMBIUM WITH NICHE WALL PRIVATE ESTATES MAINTENANCE GARAGE TRASH ENCLOSURE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FOR HIGHWAY 55 PAVEMENT, SECTION TO BE DETERMINED PER MNDOT STANDARDS HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CRUSHED GRANITE AGGREGATE PATH CONCRETE SIDEWALK TRASH TRUCK AREA TO MANEUVER MAIN ENTRANCE SIGN, FENCE AND GATE FLAG POLE WITH VETERANS MEMORIAL SEPTIC SYSTEM BACKUP SECONDARY SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATION 4" WIDE STRIPE 4" WIDE STRIPE 45' TO DRIVE LANE ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL WITH LOGO SIGN AND SIGN POST, SEE LEGEND ABOVE FOR TYPE AND STYLE 4' HIGH FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING WOOD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE BOULDERS AND CREMATION BOULDERS p 2006 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. • a� 0 11-06-2006 • a) co ♦♦ Hopkins, MN 55343 • CITY SUBMITTAL SITE LAYOUT PLAN • PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMORIAL PARK 15050 23rd Avenue North F 763-746-1699 0 C) M LC) Ln L 0 co a) c L Y w co 0 0 N M CO ti .schoellmadson.com 111 E • • T Y Y T cs, c) cn c ci L i= U � CPI C/D 1 1 = � .� .,.., A cn � 74,3 o a 'F.::'1' ›-, > .+.--, � g -' I I = � � r2 Lf) Le) C•2 C•2 ii +; n I I P4 = � cn .777, t i • �r 1 IMAGE #1 IMAGE #3 IMAGE #5 IMAGE #7 EXAMPLE OF A MAUSOLEUM CRYPT grabal" fe. SCALE = 1"-1 PROPOSED /EXISTING FRONT ENTRANCE SIGN IMAGE #2 IMAGE #4 IMAGE #6 LC LC Soil D 'ntbons LA Ll 6A: Mu keg°, Blue Earth & Houghton soils, ponded, 0-1 % slopes L C : Lester loam, moranile, 6-1% slope L A: Cordova loam, - % slopes L 4A: Glencoe barn, d presional, 0-1 % slopes L A: L rdal loam, 1- % slopes L A: Harrel, overwash-Hamel complex L B: Angus loam, m ranie, -5% slopes L40B: Angus -Kilkenny complex, -6'% slopes L41C : Lester -Kilkenny o pl x, 1% slopes, eroded L41 D : Lester -Kilkenny complex, 1 -1 % slopes, eroded L 1: Lester -Kilkenny complex, 1 - % slopes L4A: Nessel loan, 1- % slopes '. Open Water EXAMPLE OF THE ENTRY NICHE WALL FRONT ENTRANCE PERSPECTIVE Lr1C EXAMPLE OF A CREMATION LANDSCAPE BOULDER L 1C L4 r1 D L 1 Soils Exhibi Rising Spin Memorial l Park Medina . Minnesota Legend 4;3 County Soils Data Soil Types: L16 L2C L 4. L35. L35A L7 6 L4'0 6 L41 L410 L4 1 E L4. -Water dell Mason r i, l3 firq EnrjineEring Suryclying Plpicn lh, Mirmesota 1! 1^' n • t{ A » EXAMPLE OF THE ENTRANCE EXAMPLE OF THE ENTRY AREA CREMATION NICHE SHELTER COLUMBARIUM TYPICAL CREMATION LANDSCAPE BOULDER AREA EXAMPLE OF A FRONT ENTRANCE SAMPLE MONUMENT LAYOUT EXAMPLE OF A PRIVATE ESTATE • .schoellmadson.com • W d 11-06-2006 Hopkins, MN 55343 ♦ • O CITY SUBMITTAL SITE PICTURES AND SOILS MAP • PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMMORIAL PARK ato Z W as I Z CO Ci W to 2 to M 15050 23rd Avenue North LO M O O9 _ •,— d- ~ y0.. M N L� U)LO• N- oL • LL cn z co c o i c co C o 7 cii - o cfl .= a) csj � >,ti �Y- ti o_ H Lt) W H 111 E • T Y Y T rn a L U = CI CI U GQ E/T ci? I I cip � O . � •� -, . ,..• A cn � = 74,3 _,, O lin,� A.. .� � . ,.., "-" cn a-' I I =�L.) r2 In LCD -� `n I 1 =cn� 21/ PYRAMIDAL ;' ARBORVITAE 11 BROADMORE JUNIPERS 13 BROADMORE JUNIPERS 10 SUMMIT ASH EX. BLDG FFE=1010.77 3 RED OAK 3 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLES 3 RED OAK 3 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLES 7 RED OAK 5 PYRAMIDAL ARBORVITAE 5 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 7 PYRAMIDAL ARBORVITAE 0 SCALE 50 3 EMERALD QUEEN MAPLE IN 100 5 COLORADO SPRUCE 150 FEET 14 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE _A\DSCAPR PLAN 1 SCALE 1"=50' LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. VERIFY ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITH REMOVALS AND SITE WORK. 2. POND EDGE/ WETLAND BUFFER AREA: SEED BWSR U8 SEED MIX AS LOCATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. SEED MATERIAL AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER BWSR & MN/DOT 2003 SEEDING MANUAL. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY UNTIL SEED IS ESTABLISHED. 3. UPLAND BUFFER AREA: SEED WITH BWSR U5 MIX AS LOCATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. SEED MATERIAL AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER BWSR & MN/DOT 2003 SEEDING MANUAL. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY UNTIL SEED IS ESTABLISHED. 4. GENERAL TURF SEED MIX AREA: SEED ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED AREAS, NOT INDICATED TO BE PAVED, SODDED UPLAND BUFFER OR WETLAND SEEDED, WITH Mn/DOT SEED MIX 250. SEED MATERIAL AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER MN/DOT 2003 SEEDING MANUAL. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL AS NECESSARY UNTIL SEED IS ESTABLISHED. RESEED AREAS UNTIL ALL AREAS ARE ESTABLISHED. FINAL DEVELOPMENT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR INDIVIDUAL UNIT/LOT LANDSCAPING. 5. SODDED AREA: SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS, FREE OF LAWN GRASS WEEDS. MATCH INTO EXISTING, AS APPLICABLE. ANCHOR SOD ON SLOPED OR POTENTIAL EROSION AREAS, OR AS REQUIRED. 6. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON PLAN, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF PLAN AND SCHEDULE DO NOT MATCH. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO ADHERE TO THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, LATEST VERSION. ADD FERTILIZER, HERBICIDE, AND PESTICIDE AS NECESSARY FOR OPTIMUM GROWTH. 7. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4" TOPSOIL IN LAWN AREAS AND 12" TOPSOIL IN LANDSCAPE BEDS. ADD SOIL AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZER, AS NECESSARY, FOR OPTIMUM PLANT GROWTH. 8. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE EDGED WITH COMMERCIAL GRADE VINYL EDGING, "EDG—KING" BY OLY—OLA, OR APPROVED EQUAL, ANCHORED 4' O.C. WITH METAL SPIKES. 9. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE COLORED, RED CANYON BY SYLVA, OR APPROVED EQUAL. SINGLE TREE AND SHRUB PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A 4" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RING AROUND EACH BASE. DECIDUOUS PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 3' DIAMETER RING, EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A RING TO THE DRIP LINE. PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH THROUGHOUT ENTIRE PLANT BED. 10. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS, THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY, SHALL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESIRABLE LIMBS AND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DESIRABLE APPEARANCE AND COMPLETED BY A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL. 11. CONTRACTOR TO WATER PLANT MATERIAL DURING INSTALLATION AND DURING ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. VOLUME OF WATER TO BE PER PLANT REQUIREMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND NORMAL GROWTH. 12. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL FOR TWO —YEARS UPON PROJECT COMPLETION AND OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE. 13. CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF —SITE. 14. BUILDING FOUNDATION PLANTINGS PER BUILDING DEVELOPMENT. PLANTINGS ARE INSTALLED AT TIME OF BUILDING DEVELOPMENT. TREE PRESERVATION TREES WILL BE REPLACED AT A 2 : 1 CALIPER INCHES. 16 CALIPER INCHES HAVE BEEN REMOVED TO ACCOMIDATE GRADING. WE WILL BE REPLACING WITH A MINIMUM OF DOUBLE REMOVED. ALL DECEDIOUS TREES SHALL BE 2-1/2" CALIPER AND EVERGREEN TREES TO BE 8" HEIGHT, OR 3" CALIPER. THE ARBORVITAES ARE TO BE AT A 6' HEIGHT OR 2" CALIPER LANDSCAPE SYMBOLS DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREE EVERGREEN TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB MEM MI POND EDGE/WETLAND BUFFER SEED MIX— BWSR U8 UPLAND BUFFER SEED MIX— BWSR U5 GENERAL TURF SEED MIX— Mn/DOT 250. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT RECEIVING SOD, POND EDGE/WETLAND SEED OR UPLAND BUFFER SEED MIX SUGGESTED TREE SCHEDULE SYM QTY COMMON NAME/LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS A 3 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 2-1/2" B&B STRAIGHT LEADER Acer x freemanii 'Jeffersred' CAL. AND FULL CROWN o j B 3 EMERALD QUEEN MAPLE 2-1/2" B&B STRAIGHT LEADER Acer platanoides 'Emerald Queen' CAL. AND FULL CROWN C 13 RED OAK 2-1/2" B&B STRAIGHT LEADER Quercus rubra CAL. AND FULL CROWN D 10 SUMMIT ASH 2-1/2" B&B STRAIGHT LEADER Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Summit' CAL. AND FULL CROWN • E 19 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 8' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE Picea glauca 'densata' HT F 5 COLORADO SPRUCE 8' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE Picea pungens HT G 33 PYRAMIDAL ARBORVITAE 6' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE Thu ja occidentalis "Pyramidal" HT H 24 BROADMORE JUNIPER 18" CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE JUNIPERIOUS SABINA 'BROADMOOR' HT QUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ,2TY �L6.0 ICAL PRIVA E �S A 1' NOT TO SCALE © 2006 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. • 0 11-06-2006 • Hopkins, MN 55343 c U • • CITY SUBMITTAL ai s SITE LANDSCAPE / IRRIGATION PLAN • • PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMORIAL PARK 15050 23rd Avenue North LO M O O9 ~ co CV LO 7L U) LO ti o Lco LL c z cp o i c co C C) � C73 o >,ti �_NGti 13_H unwH c O cT>f CO v, a� 'E, a) w 0 c U c Ci) .schoellmadson.com 111 • • T y Y T rn U 4J L = CI CI U � c'T u? 1 I up a � � .,.., .," � A cip = 74,3 _ o � � ..--, -,--,- tea.. .� cip � I I = � c._.) r2 in LeJ C•I 1 C•1 1 � +; - n 1 1 � = � � " " FENCE TO BE REMOVED GRAVEL PARKING TO BE REMOVED ALL TREES TO REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED CULVERT TO BE REMOVED GRAVEL PARKING :; TO BE REMOVED WALL TO BE REMOVED EXISTING HOUSE, PROPOSED OFFICE TREES TO BE REMOVED EXISTING BARN TO BE DEMOLISHED FENCE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING SEPTIC LINE AND SYSTEM EXISTING BARN TO BE REMOVED EXISTING BARN TO BE REMOVED TREES TO BE REMOVED TO ACCOMIDATE ROAD EXISTING HOUSE DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL NOTES ALL SITE FEATURES AND OVERHEAD/UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT INDICATED TO BE REMOVED SHALL REMAIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE FEATURES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. ALL SITE FEATURES DAMAGED BY CONTRACTOR, NOT SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED, SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED BY CONTRACTOR TO OWNERS SATISFACTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. B. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE PROVIDED BY THE OWNER AND REPRODUCED FOR REFERENCE ONLY FROM AN ORIGINAL HARRY S. JOHNSON LAND SURVEYORY, INC.. PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AT DRIPLINE. DEMOLITION LEGEND PROTECT TREES REMOVE TREE FULL DEPTH AGGREGATE REMOVALS. 60 120 180 SCALE WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES, OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. � 2006 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. 7.3 0 11-06-2006 Hopkins, MN 55343 c N U CITY SUBMITTAL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN f&f& " PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMMORIAL PARK 15050 23rd Avenue North LO CO O O9 d- ~ " M N t �� u)" ��ti N- W aoco LL c z c o i c co c " o 7 (73 o cfl E CCD 1-CO ati ��_NGti 13_H LnwH .schoellmadson.com m Y Q 0, rn m Y Q m Q 1")Y o CI CI U i aq CPI 1 C/D 1 1 1 cip ,_, �� . o .�� .-" up a o . al. +: .-a .,_, �� .,.., t �� cip U co a.) Q '' ", ~I -, c-'1 I I r2 o lin �� 1 LCD c\2 I ' > �; �� �� a4 = ��I ��I I I " " " 2 -24" RCP 1.30% INS%.IN=982.25 INV.OUT=98 1.18 INSTALL 8.3 CYS R i P RA W/ GEO TEXTILE FAfsRI�� 2-54'-24" RCP INV.IN=975.20 INV.OUT=974.12 INSTALL 15.9 CYS RIPRAP W/ GEO TEXTILE FABRIC. CHECK. s ICT A TEMPORAY SEDIMENTATION TRAP. AFTER GRADING COMPLETED AND DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABLIZED, COVERT THIS SEDIMENTATION TRAP INTO A RAIN GARDEN. EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS TO BE INSTALLED ALL SLOPES GREATER 4 TO 1 88'-27" RCP � 1.00% INV.IN=979.50 NV.OUT=978.62 INSTALL 8.7 CYS RIPRAP C L III W/ GEO TEXTILE FABRIC. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES, OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE SITE AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH SLOPE GREATER 4:1 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 5. WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 6. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 8. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 9. REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS. 11. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS 12. SWEEP ADJACENT STREET IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE: 1. INSPECT SILT FENCES AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. IMMEDIATELY REPAIR FAILED OR FAILING FENCES. 2. REPLACEMENT  FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BECOMES INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. 3. SEDIMENT REMOVAL  SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. 4. ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER FABRIC IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE GRADED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED, AND SEEDED WITH THE APPROPRIATE SEED MIX AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. LEGEND DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR 998 DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EH- DENOTES EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE DENOTES PROPOSED BUILDING -E70000- DENOTES EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. DENOTES ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DENOTES CONCRETE WASH OUT AREA DENOTES TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION TRAP. DENOTES HAY BALES OR BIOROLL DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER AND RIPRAP DENOTES WETLAND BOUNDARY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE DATA: TOTAL AREA: 28 ACRE (INCLUDING WETLAND AND LAKE) 15.1 ACRE (NOT INCLUDING WETLAND AND LAKE) EXISTING CONDITIONS IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 8413 SF = 0.19 ACRE PROPOSED CONDITIONS 0 50 IMPERVIOUS SURFADE 68735 SF = 1.58 ACRE. 100 150 SCALE IN FEET � 2006 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ib 0 11-06-2006 O " Nin m s " " Hopkins, MN 55343 c N U " " ��Z 1-a HJ 3 in ��Z 1- 5a cc W H N i= D. m s CO " N " PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMORIAL PARK a Nt 3�� _ 0 Z W H a a I Z W la 2 co co " 15050 23rd Avenue North Ln L) CU 0 cn a) c c 0 _A EL F 763-746-1699 0 0 cis M GD ti H S, 0 CO a, a) a�� w 0 F c U Cn M N M CD ti LL 00 0 0 N co co ti H schoellmadson.com lfl E " T m �� �� QgQ m T m , ��C.JQ CD I- I_- 0 it U �� cfa cla , o �� .-4 .-i �� 7 is zrn .4-) .- . r, o .. 1=1. p, ,, DO ;." 1CZ 0,2 VW Q r4 = .. ...., C..) o ICJ �� �� �� ,--i in �� cz I I x = a, a, W Cn oo N O . •(0 • . . . /^ • • 'O .....: 99�.2 ....• 993..14 • • • . . • . . . • • 99.7 • 995..39 . . . . • • 995.0 • • 997.42 • • • • . . . . . . • • 94.0 • . . • 1411 •O . . • 1411 • . • • . . 3?" • . . . • . . • • _ _ _ . . . . . :BVCS: 13+7b . • : :BVCE: 996.g1 . • . • . . 1 . . . • . • EVCS: 1 4+25 : • EVCE: 997.89 • • • _ • . • .. ! . • . _ _ 998.14 • • • • . • •• . . • . . . . . • • ...99p.9 ....... 998.64 • •. • • . �. . . . . . 0 . • • • • 100_'0.0 ' ...._ _ • 999.14 • •. • •• . . • . . . . . • • • .•.Pn•.3......•_ 999.64 • •. • •• . . • . . . . . • • • 94.7 • • 1009.14 • • • . . • . . . . . • • • 100;0.8 .._ ' 00000 • ._ 1000.95 • •. • • . . . . • . . • . • • • 100;3.2 • 1003.64 • . . . • . . • . • • • • 100;6. 3 ' ..._ _ 1006.64 • •. • •• . . • • . . . . • • • 100;9.6 • 1009.04 . • . • . . . . . • • • 1007.._ .7 ' .• __ 1007.84 • . • • . . • . . . . . • • 100;6.0 • 1006.17 • . . • . . . . • • 100;5.9 ••••• ._ 100. 5.25 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 100;5.2 • 1004.47 • • . • . . . . . 10 0:4. 9 • • 003.•7�5 = . . ::� •00 •CU : C31 :O • . . . • . . . . • . . . • . . . . • . _ . . • • . . . • . . . • . . . . • . . . • .(1::1 .•011 • . • • . • . 1 BVCS: 16+75 BVCE: 1000.39 : • . •�� .•. : \ • EVCS: 17+25 • • EVCE: 1002.14 • 1411 •� .0 .0 • .♦� •O . . . • . • • . < • • D - • •o- pi- cn • .,o I I m -. • ••oo� II < D ' •� I II II • :����• o�,+ • • o. . � . • • . . . . . . • < -0 • < 0 o • m -1 • bd < D oL• JI. 11 ' ll • ci t `•0 00+ 0 � o • • _ _ _ . . . . • • .� . • . o • . oo • . • • • . • . _ _ _ . . • . : BVCS: 18+25 : • EVCE: i 008.74 • • . . . . . . .j �(.N• . . . ,o• . • - - - • • • • • . . . . • • . • . •. . • . . . • • . . _ . . • . . . • • . • . • • . . . • . . • :O •O • 'O • • • • • / : BVCE: 1006,94 EVCS: 19+75 : EV:CE: 1005.65: • . . . •� :O . 1111 '•O . C31 . •O t • . •• . . • • • . . • . . . . . • • . . • v� 0 -179 6001 A3-I3 Ind . 0• . < • . < o M -1 op• < D o4 • I1 • li ' It <3 •N no, o oo t0 + ' �o . • . • •O IIZZ 10001 —3S`d8 31V0a100V S -10 `NOSOVIN 2S) Z n Cr) M i c� 00 2 � >0 O rr 0 (N cn rm DC0 mma U)000 ,> 1 N N 17) M 3 c� r0 0 -0 2 D� O rr 0 cn (Am DCv mCCOD DmZ V)00 1 N N t 5Z'95+81 = `d1S 11\110d HOIH 20'6001 = n3-I3 11\110d HOIH O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1015.1 • 980.1 975.1 978.1 984.1 • • • • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ; : . ..: .57111 .::::. .(1)-rlii •P . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • EVCS: 12+97.50 EVCE: 93.03 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • EVCS: 14+25 • • • • • • • • 1 ) • • • • 01 Revisions Date: Description: By: 9-11-25 Initial City Submittal SMI 9-25-25 City Submittal Revisions SMI Designed By: TDH Drawn By: JAK Checked By: KA • Schoell Madson Planning Engineering Surveying 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 554 Third Street NW, Suite 100 Elk River, Minnesota 55330 • • • • • PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMORIAL PARK 3365 STATE HIGHWAY 55 • • • • Richard G. Gay Hopkins, MN 55343 Sheet Title: CITY SUBMITTAL SITE DRIVEWAY PROFILE • 11-06-2006 SMI Project Number: 64477-001 ��Q / / / 1 1 1 1 / 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 101' 1 I �� L / / / / / / / / / / / / / I / 1 i f I I I I I EX. BLDG FFE=1010.77 ss I / \N_ / WETLAND MITIGATION AREA (2203 SF) J r J i i i 4-r44 4/0 \\g4,o \ o��, N \ \tigc \ F F,4 /IIIJ_ w*"."#A n n ss ss i I 49 -J / o / �� Pam� ��------------ ��/ / L J J 1 l / i i / LAKE f),so� HIGH WATER MARK 965.00 yV4-7. 4/1No 1 y'9 0 qr, UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT PETER 1 I 1 moo, 1 i / zz ��z 1 EMEND DRP��NAGE ��S I 1 1 I 1 J / 1  UT/07-7-A7vp D _ _AGE_ RA��NEASEMENT , WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES, OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. LEGEND DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR 998 DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C3- DENOTES EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE DENOTES PROPOSED BUILDING DENOTES EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. o ao��oo��oo 00 0o a����o 00 o ��o ��0���� ��o ��o 00 �� ���� ���� 00 00��00 00 00000 0 0000000 ��00 00 00��00 0 00 00��o DENOTES ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DENOTES CONCRETE WASH OUT AREA DENOTES TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION TRAP. DENOTES HAY BALES OR BIOROLL DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER AND RIPRAP  DENOTES WETLAND BOUNDARY 0 50 DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT DENOTES ELECTRIC EASEMENT CO 100 150 SCALE IN FEET � 2006 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. 11-06-2006 " Hopkins, MN 55343 a U ai" 0 J " ���� z is a a I- Z ma Z ��cc W co 2 oN a W " s co " . " " PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMORIAL PARK 3365 STATE HIGHWAY 55 MEDINA, MN 55447 15050 23rd Avenue North ti LO LO O O �� o �� o c o �� o �� ti O M EN- O_ IH F 763-746-1699 o�� c�� -0 CO a, 49  ��5 a�� w 0 c V c (i) o_cu LO C9 N M CO ti LL .schoellmadson.com 111 E m= -0 p 1- c a, ct m Q 2 0 T co . < U a.) = U s=c1 cn c/D A o +) -�� " _ a co = ,�� cn �� o .�� . _, ��'4,2 a up cu a4 .,._, = o0 .--, C.-) Liz c�� Liz cz -.--4 1 -�� _, a) cd �� I �� I Ix = cm az S PROJECT: RISING SUN MEMORIAL PARK LOCATION: 3365 STATE HWY 55, MEDINA, MN 55447 DATE: 2 OCTOBER 2006 OWNER/DEVELOPER: RICHARD G. GAY 612 1 1 TH AVE. SOUTH HOPKINS, MN 55343 612-369-0819 CONTRACTOR: TO BE DETERMINED ENGINEER: SCHOELL MADSON 15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 CONTACT: JIM KALKES 763-746-1611 jimk@schoellmadson.com 1. DESCRIPTION (purpose and types of soil disturbing 4CtlVltle8): THE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF A CEMETARY WITH A NUMBER OF PRIVATE ESTATES, MOSULEUMS, CRYPTS, AND BURIAL PLOTS. THE PROJECT ACREAGE IS 15.1 ACRES. DEVELOPEMENT IS APPROXIMATELY 2 ACRES. IMPERVIOUS AREA WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 1.5 ACRES. THIS SWPPP WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PHASE II STORM WATER PERMIT FOR THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. THIS SWPPP IS DESIGNED TO (1) IDENTIFY ALL THE POTENTIAL SOURCES OF POLLUTION WHICH MAY REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO AFFECT STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM THE SITE; 2 DESCRIBE THE PRACTICES TO BE USED TO REDUCE POLLUTANTS IN STORM WATER () DISCHARGES FROM THE SITE; AND (3) ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE NPDES PHASE II STORM WATER PERMIT. AS REQUIRED AND DEFINED BY THE NPDES PHASE II STORM WATER PERMIT, THE SWPPP WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE FROM THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF FINAL STABILIZATION. THE PROJECT WILL BEGIN IN THE FALL OF 2006 AND WILL BE COMPLETED BY FALL OF 2007. THE PROJECT SHALL FOLLOW MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION 2005 EDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. LOCATION: THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN 3365 STATE HWY 55, MEDINA, MN 55447 3. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: THE ORDER OF ACTIVITIES WILL BE AS FOLLOWS AND OPERATOR RESPONSIBLE NOTED. SITE GRADING & EROSIION CONTROL PLAN- INSTALL ROCK ENTRANCE BERM- GRADING CONTRACTOR SILT FENCE AND TREE FENCE- GRADING CONTRACTOR CLEARING AND GRUBBING- GRADING CONTRACTOR EXCAVATION, EARTH MOVING- GRADING CONTRACTOR TOPSOIL RESPREAD- GRADING CONTRACTOR INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND NEW PONDS & WETLAND MITIGATION AREAS- GRADING CONTRACTOR RESTORATION -SEEDING, BLANKET, ETC.- GRADING CONTRACTOR TRANSFER SWPPP RESPONSIBILITY TO UTILITY CONTRACTOR IF APPLICABLE- GRADING CONTRACTOR STREET CONSTRUCTION - IMPORT CLASS 5- STREET CONTRACTOR INSTALL BASE COURSE- STREET CONTRACTOR STREET, SIDEWALKS, TRAILS - STREET CONTRACTOR RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS- STREET CONTRACTOR MINOR UTILITY INSTALLATION- RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS- ELECTRIC COMPANY INSTALL INFILTRATION BASI NS/RAI NGARDENS- GRADING CONTRACTOR STREET CONSTRUCTION- INSTALL WEAR COURSE- STREET CONTRACTOR INSPECT SITE - CURRENT CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP, TRANSFER SWPPP RESPONSIBILTY- CURRENT CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP THE CONTRACTOR MAY NEED TO APPLY TEMPORARY MEASURES (SEEDING AND MULCHING WITHIN 200 FEET OF WATERS OF THE STATE WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD OF THE PERMIT - 7, 14, AND 21 DAYS. LONG TERM MAINTENANCE THE INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM MAINTENANCE OF THE RAINGARDENS AND INFILTRATION BASINS. ORM A R PO F. STOCK PILES STOCKPILES SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS OF ACTIVITY. G. HIGH VOLUME DRAINAGE SWALES DRAINAGE SWALES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY BIO-ROLLS, WOODFIBER BLANKET, AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL METHODS AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 5.2 STANDARD CONTROL MEASURES A. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE A ROCK ENTRANCE BERM IS CONSTRUCTED OF COARSE CLEAN ROCK INSTALLED AT THE PROPOSED ENTRANCE POINT FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES. A DETAIL OF THE ROCK ENTRANCE BERM IS SHOWN ON THE FINAL GRADING PLAN. THIS STONE PAD PROVIDES A TIRE CLEANING MECHANISM FOR ALL VEHICLES LEAVING THE SITE. B. SILT FENCE SILT FENCES ARE DESIGNED AS A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BARRIER CONSISTING OF A FILTER FABRIC ATTACHED TO SUPPORT POSTS. THIS SITE HAS TWO APPLICATIONS FOR SILT FENCE. THESE APPLICATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1) THE INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE ALONG EXISTING WETLANDS TO PROVIDE STRONGER, MORE DURABLE PROTECTION. 2) THE INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND THE CREATED PONDS AND WETLANDS AFTER CONSTRUCTION TO CONTROL THE SEDIMENT RUNOFF UNTIL THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED AND THE DEVELOPMENT IS COMPLETED. BOTH EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S WILL BE PLACED DIRECTLY BEHIND THE CURB AND/OR SIDEWALK. AN EXAMPLE OF THIS PRACTICE WOULD CONSIST OF SOD OR SEED & BLANKET BEHIND THE CURB AND IN FRONT OF THE SIDEWALK, AND SILT FENCE OR WOOD MULCH BEHIND THE SIDEWALK. C. FINISHED GRADE SLOPES THE SITE IS BEING GRADED AT 3:1 SLOPES OR FLATTER TO PROVIDE A LESS EROSIVE SURFACE. 3:1 SLOPES SHALL BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT MIX 150. ANY 3:1 SLOPES OVER 35 FEET IN LENGTH (UNLESS THEY ARE ISOLATED FROM RUNON WATER) OR 3:1 SLOPES WITH CONCENTRATED FLOWS SHOULD USE A MNDOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AS NEEDED. THERE SHALL BE NO UNBROKEN 3:1 SLOPES GREATER THAN 75 FEET IN LENGTH. THERE ARE NO SLOPES PROPOSED GREATER THAN 3:1. D. RESTORATION TEMPORARY/PERMANENT STABILIZATION (SEEDING AND MULCHING)- TEMPORARY SEEDING WILL BE DONE AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PHASE II PERMIT, BUT THE GRADING WILL BE SCHEDULED TO MINIMIZE THE DISTURBED AREA AT ALL TIMES. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE RESTORED WITH 6" OF TOPSOIL. THE SEED MIX SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT MIX 150 APPLIED AT A RATE OF 40 LBS/ACRE AND FERTILIZED WITH 10-10- 20 AT A RATE OF 200 LBS/ACRE. THE MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 AND APPLIED AT A RATE OF 2 TONS/ACRES, DISC ANCHORED (WITH DISC BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT) IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT. WOOD FIBER BLANKETS (MNDOT CATEGORY 3) WILL BE INSTALLED ON 3:1 SLOPES AS NEEDED AND ON ALL DITCH BOTTOMS GREATER THAN 2%. E. PERMANENT SEED: 250 �, 70 LBS/ACRE FERTILIZER: 22-5-10 0 350 LBS/ACRE MULCH: TYPE 1 ®2 TONS/ACRE AND DISCANCHORING ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 AND FLATTER. MNDOT TYPE 4 ON SLOPES BETWEEN 3:1 AND 2:1. BLANKET: CATEGORY 3 OR 4 ON SLOPES 2:1 AND STEEPER. ALSO DITCH BOTTOMS GREATER THAN 2%. F. TRASH AND DEBRIS ALL TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS FROM THE SITE WILL BE COLLECTED AND DEPOSITED IN A DUMPSTER. THE DUMPSTER SHALL BE EMPTIED AS NECESSARY. NO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SHALL BE BURIED ON SITE. ALL SANITARY SEWER WASTE WILL BE COLLECTED FROM THE PORTABLE UNITS AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL REGULATIONS. G. STREET SWEEPING AND CLEANING AFTER THE STREETS ARE COMPLETED AND DURING ROAD CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR WILL HAVE STREET CLEANING AND SWEEPING COMPLETED ON A SCHEDULED BASIS OR AS WEATHER DICTATES. H. DEWATERING DEWATERING OR ANY TYPE OF SURFACE DRAINAGE THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP S SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER OR DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEETING, OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING MUST BE DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS, EROSION, OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. I. CONNECTION TO SURFACE WATERS ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF A SURFACE WATER OR ANY STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WHICH IS CONNECTED TO A SURFACE WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS (STEEPER THAN 3:1 SLOPES), 14 DAYS (10:1 TO 3:1 SLOPES), OR 21 DAYS (FLATTER THAN THESE AREAS INCLUDE POND SIDE SLOPES, EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A POSITIVE SLOPE TO A CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEM, STORM SEWER WITH INLET, DRAINAGE DITCH, OR OTHER SYSTEM THAT DISCHARGES TO A U ON PR %. EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE: 7.1 EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION INSPECTIONS WILL INCLUDE A VISUAL INSPECTION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS OF THE SITE, MATERIAL STORAGE AREAS EXPOSED TO PRECIPITATION, SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, LOCATIONS WHERE VEHICLES ENTER OR EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, AND ACCESSIBLE DISCHARGE POINTS (OUT FALLS). THE PURPOSE OF THE INSPECTIONS IS TO ASSESS AND DETERMINE WHETHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE OPERATING PROPERLY AND EFFECTIVELY. INSPECTION REPORTS WILL BE COMPLETED AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION AND CERTIFIED AS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE NPDES PHASE II STORM WATER PERMIT. THE CONTENT OF THE INSPECTION REPORTS WILL ADDRESS THE REQUIRED CONTENT FOR THE INSPECTION REPORTS PROVIDED BY THE NPDES PHASE II STORM WATER PERMIT. THE INSPECTION REPORT WILL INDICATE WHETHER ANY INCIDENTS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PHASE II STORM WATER PERMIT WERE OBSERVED AND ANY CONDITIONS REQUIRING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SWPPP. ALL INSPECTION AND INSPECTION REPORTS AT THIS SITE WILL BE COMPLETED BY A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S FIRM. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS SHALL SPECIFY THE FOLLOWING: 1. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION. 2. NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS. 3. DATE AND AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 IN / 24 HR. ALL INSPECTORS WILL BE FAMILIAR WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THIS SWPPP INCLUDING THE IMPLEMENTED BMP'S AND WILL COMPLETE REGULAR INSPECTIONS OF THE SITE. DOCUMENTATION OF THE EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL MAKING INSPECTIONS AT THIS SITE ARE INCLUDED IN THIS SECTION OF THE SWPPP. INSPECTIONS WILL BE COMPLETED ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE BELOW. 1. EVERY 7 DAYS 2. WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF EACH RAIN EVENT OF 0.5" OR MORE 3. WHEN 6�� OF SNOW MELT OCCURS 7.2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE 1. ALL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD WORKING ORDER. NECESSARY MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS WILL BE INITIATED WITHIN A 24 HOUR PERIOD OF THE MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REPORT. A RECORD OF ALL REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE WITHIN THE REPORT. 2. EXPOSED EXCAVATION AREAS SHALL BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM BY BALANCING CUT AND FILL AREAS THROUGHOUT THE GRADING OPERATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN. 3. SILT FENCE WILL BE INSPECTED FOR DEPTH OF SEDIMENT. BUILT-UP SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL SILT FENCE WHEN IT HAS REACHED ONE-THIRD OF THE FENCE HEIGHT. 4. SILT FENCE WILL BE INSPECTED FOR TEARS. SILT FENCE SHALL ALSO BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE THE FABRIC IS SECURELY ATTACHED TO THE FENCE POSTS, AND TO SEE IF THE FENCE POSTS ARE FIRMLY IN THE GROUND. 5. STOCKPILES WILL BE INSPECTED FOR SILT FENCE OR OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORM WATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES. 6. THE SEEDING AND MULCHING WILL BE INSPECTED FOR ANY BARE SPOTS AND WASHOUTS. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY HAVE TO BE EMPLOYED TO ENSURE HEALTHY GROWTH AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF MEDINA OR THE PROJECT ENGINEER. 7. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND OTHER BMPS WILL BE MAINTAINED IN EFFECTIVE OPERATING CONDITION. IF INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT A BMP IS NOT OPERATING PROPERLY, MAINTENANCE OR MODIFICATION OF THE BMP WILL BE PERFORMED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND BEFORE THE NEXT STORM EVENT WHENEVER PRACTICABLE AND NO LATER THAN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE INSPECTION DATE TO ENSURE ITS CONTINUED EFFECTIVENESS. 8. IF ADDITIONAL BMPS ARE NECESSARY, THE ADDITION WILL BE MADE BEFORE THE NEXT STORM EVENT, WHENEVER PRACTICABLE, AND NOT LATER THAN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE INSPECTION DATE. IF IMPLEMENTATION BEFORE THE NEXT STORM EVENT IS NOT PRACTICABLE, THE CONDITIONS WILL BE DOCUMENTED IN THE APPLICABLE SWPPP AMENDMENT, AND ALTERNATIVE BMPS WILL BE USED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 9. OFF SITE SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL PAVEMENT SURFACES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. 10. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL SURFACE WATERS WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY. 8. FINAL STABILIZATION: TEMPORARY STABILIZATION WILL REMAIN IN PLACE FOR ALL AREAS UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION OCCURS. TO COMPLETE FINAL STABILIZATION, THE FOLLOWING MUST OCCUR: -STABILIZATION BY UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER(70% COVER) -PIONEER-SARAH CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT -SEED AND MULCH TO BE APPLIED WITHIN 72 HOURS AFTER ROUGH GRADING IS COMPLETE. THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) SHALL BE USED TO TERMINATE PERMIT COVERAGE OF THE ORIGINAL STORMWATER PERMIT NUMBER OR THE SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION PERMIT NUMBER. 9. PLAN AMENDMENTS: THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) WILL BE AMENDED IF THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE DISCHARGE TO THE SURFACE WATERS OR UNDERGROUND WATERS. THE PLAN WILL ALSO BE AMENDED IF IT IS PROVEN TO BE INADEQUATE IN CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN STORM WATER DISCHARGES DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. V N ON P AN 13. ENDANGERED SPECIES: NONE KNOWN 14. TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS: THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO LAKE PETER, WHICH IS A RECRATIONAL LAKE. WHILE THERE WILL BE NO DIRECT DISCHARGE TO THE LAKE, THE WETLAND HAS AN EMERGENCY OVERFLOW TO LAKE PETER. 15. TIMING OF CONTROLS AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR SWPPP MONITORING: AS INDICATED IN THE AFOREMENTIONED SEQUENCE OF MAJOR ACTIVITIES, THE ROCK ENTRANCE BERM AND SOME OF THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED, THE SITE CLEARING AND MOWING WILL BE COMPLETED, THE GRADING OPERATIONS WILL BEGIN WITH THE EXCAVATION OF THE STORM WATER PONDS. ONCE THE GRADING IS COMPLETE THE PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSTALLED AND THE SEEDING AND MULCHING WILL BEGIN. THE UTILITY AND STREET WORK ARE SCHEDULED FOR THE 2007 CONSTRUCTION SEASON. AFTER THE UTILITY AND STREET WORK IS COMPLETED THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR WILL COMPLETE THE FINAL SITE RESTORATION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS, THE CITY OF MEDINA WILL DO A SITE INSPECTION OF THE BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE; THIS INSPECTION WILL COVER THE ENTIRE SITE, AND THEY WILL CHECK ALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO ACCEPTING THE PROJECT. AFTER THIS INSPECTION THE CITY WILL DIRECT THE DEVELOPER AS TO WHICH EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO REMOVE. 20. SOIL INFORMATION: FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: Currently, the ground cover is an existing hobby farm The recovered soil samples estimate the distribution of color, presence of lenses classified the soils according (ASTM D2488). The subsurface profile consisted overlying fine alluvium and encountered peat ranging grade (terminal depth of the Measurements of ground water borings, followed by installation ground water levels and piezometer boring logs. SB-I encountered water at a piezometer reading of 9'3" had an elevation substantially 35 feet higher than the others. Therefore, it is our opinion water. Perched ground water The lowest boring, SB-4 and water at 19 feet below grade reading of 2 feet below grade, elevations as well as the site (HAWL) is 976 feet. We wish to point out that allowed for equilibrium to available during the normal relatively impermeable layers anticipate water levels will amounts. Ground water or the season of construction. 12.5 feet below existing grade. The boreholes were backfilled We also wish to advise that and that final closure of the APPROXIMATE QUANTITY OF 21. SITE OPERATORS: EACH OPERATOR OF THE SITE HAS CONTROL ARE PROVIDED CONTRACTORS): NAME OF OPERATOR Physical Summary & Findings at the boring locations consists with existing structures consisting were visually examined by a geotechnical grain sizes, plasticity, consistency, and seams, and apparent geologic to type using the Unified Soil of 2 inches to 7 feet of glacial till consisting of silts and from 7.5 feet below grade to a boring). were conducted during drilling of piezometers with in the reading levels can be found 12 feet below grade during drilling below grade, approximately 24 higher than the remaining borings, Soil Borings SB-2 and SB-3 on the water encountered within could also be encountered elsewhere having an elevation of 969 feet, during drilling operations, followed approximately 24 hours later. topography, we feel the Highest the groundwater level may vary occur in the borings. Extended observation scope of the field exploration program. of cohesive material encountered fluctuate dependent on the season seepage water in the upper profile Cave in depth of the boring was with auger cuttings after retrieval minor settlement of the boreholes boreholes is the responsibility SOIL MOVED ON SITE = 3,000 CY AND THE AREA OF THE SITE OVER BELOW (E.G. LAND DEVELOPER, AREA OF CONTROL of grass cover. The site of houses and barns. engineer to moisture condition, origin. The engineer Classification System organic sandy clay topsoil clays. Soil boring SB-4 depth of 20 feet below operations at the test bore holes. Encountered on the attached operations, followed by hours later. This boring ranging from 26 to encountered no water. SB-I is a perched ground throughout the site. encountered ground by a piezometer Based on mottled soil Anticipated Water Level depending on the time time was not Due to the throughout the site, we and precipitation will vary dependent on noted at a depth of of the piezometers. is expected to occur of the owner. WHICH THE OPERATOR HOME BUILDERS GENERAL PERMIT # 16. NON -STORM WATER DISCHARGES: IT IS EXPECTED THAT THE FOLLOWING NON -STORM WATER DISCHARGES WILL OCCUR FROM THE SITE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD -WATER FROM THE WATER WAGON FOR DUST CONTROL, IF NEEDED -WATER FROM THE STREET SWEEPERS -UNCONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER FOR ANY DEWATERING EXCAVATIONS, IF REQUIRED 18. CONSTRUCTION CHEMICALS AND POLLUTANTS: 18.1 SPILL PREVENTION THE FOLLOWING ARE THE MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES THAT WILL BE USED TO REDUCE THE RISK OF SPILLS OR OTHER ACCIDENTAL EXPOSURE OF MATERIALS AND SUBSTANCES TO STORM WATER RUNOFF. -AN EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO STORE ONLY ENOUGH PRODUCT TO DO THE REQUIRED JOB. -ALL MATERIALS STORED ON SITE SHALL BE STORED IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY MANNER. -ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE KEPT IN THEIR ORIGINAL CONTAINER, WITH THE ORIGINAL LABELS STILL ATTACHED, UNLESS THE CONTAINERS ARE NOT RESEALABLE. -SUBSTANCES SHALL NOT BE MIXED WITH ONE ANOTHER UNLESS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. -WHENEVER POSSIBLE, ALL OF THE PRODUCT SHALL BE USED UP BEFORE DISPOSING OF THE CONTAINER. -MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROPER DISPOSAL SHALL BE FOLLOWED. -THE SITE SUPERINTENDENT WILL ROUTINELY INSPECT THE SITE TO INSURE PROPER DISPOSAL OF ALL ON SITE MATERIALS. FERTILIZERS -FERTILIZERS SHALL BE APPLIED ONLY IN THE MINIMUM AMOUNTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. ONCE APPLIED, THE FERTILIZER WILL BE WORKED INTO THE SOIL TO LIMIT THE EXPOSURE TO TRANSIENT SURFACE WATERS. PAINTS -ALL CONTAINERS WILL BE TIGHTLY SEALED AND STORED WHEN NOT REQUIRED FOR USE. EXCESS PAINT SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS. CONCRETE TRUCKS -CONCRETE TRUCKS (ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT) WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED TO WASH OUT IN DESIGNATED DISCHARGE AREAS. PRODUCT SPECIFIC PRACTICES -PETROLEUM PRODUCTS -ALL ON SITE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT WILL BE MONITORED FOR LEAKS AND RECEIVE REGULAR PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE TO REDUCE THE CHANCE OF LEAKAGE. NO ENGINE DEGREASING WILL BE ALLOWED ON SITE. PETROLEUM PRODUCTS WILL BE STORED IN A TIGHTLY SEALED CONTAINER, WHICH IS CLEARLY LABELED. ANY ASPHALT SUBSTANCES USED ON SITE WILL BE APPLIED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 18.2 SPILL CONTROL PRACTICES -ALL SPILLS WILL BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AFTER DISCOVERY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED METHODS. -THE SPILL AREA WILL BE KEPT WELL VENTILATED. -SPILLS OF TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WILL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES. -A LOG OF THE SPILL TYPE, LOCATION, DATE, AND TIME WILL BE CREATED BY THE JOB SUPERINTENDENT. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE ADJUSTED TO INCLUDE MEASURES TO PREVENT THIS TYPE OF SPILL FROM REOCCURRING. 18.3 HAZARDOUS WASTES HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST BE STORED AND DISPOSED OF PER M.P.C.A. REGULATIONS. SECONDARY CONTAINMENT & RESTRICTED ACCESS MUST BE PROVIDED AROUND FUELING AREAS OF ANY) OR AS DIRECTED BY THE SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. CONTAINMENT DEVICES MAY INCLUDE POLY -LINED SOIL BERM, POLY -LINED STRAW BALES, OR APPROVED IMPERVIOUS BARRIER. 19. HOUSEKEEPING BMP'S: A.VEHICLE REPAIR ACTIVITIES IPEMAINTENANCEI ITTHE SITEILL A BEPERFORMEDEQUIPMENT IN THE DESIGNATED CONTROL AREASTHS AREA TO BE FIELD LOCATED BY CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER AND NOTED ON THE SWPPP. B. SOLID MATERIALS, INCLUDING BUILDING MATERIALS, GARBAGE, AND DEBRIS WILL BE CLEANED UP DAILY AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF THESE MATERIALS TO SURFACE WATERS OR TO STORM DRAINS. C. WASTE RECEPTACLES WITH LIDS WILL BE PROVIDED AT CONVENIENT LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE SITE. THESE RECEPTACLES ARE, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, PLACED IN LOCATIONS THAT DO NOT RECEIVE SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNTS OF STORM WATER RUNOFF AND THAT DO NOT DRAIN DIRECTLY TO SURFACE WATER BODIES. THE LOCATIONS OF THESE RECEPTACLES TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. THE RECEPTACLES WILL BE EMPTIED AND THE WASTE REMOVED FROM THE SITE FOR APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL OR RECYCLING ON A REGULAR SCHEDULE TO PREVENT THEM FROM OVERFILLING. D. LOCATIONS FOR EQUIPMENT WASH OUT AREAS AT THE SITE SITE WILL BE NOTED ON THE SWPPP. EQUIPMENT WASH WATER WILL BE CONTROLLED TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED DRY WEATHER DISCHARGES AND TO AVOID MIXING WITH STORM WATER. E. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND CHEMICALS USED OR STORED ON SITE ARE KEPT IN SMALL QUANTITIES WHENEVER POSSIBLE. WHEN NOT IN USE, THEY WILL BE STORED IN SEALED CONTAINERS AND UNDER COVER TO PREVENT DIRECT CONTACT WITH STORM WATER. APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF DESIGNATED MATERIAL AND CHEMICAL STORAGE AREAS ARE PROVIDED ON THE SWPPP MAP. ANY INADVERTENT SPILLS WILL BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY AND THE MATERIALS WILL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. F. VEHICLE FUELING WILL BE CONDUCTED IN A LOCATION AWAY FROM ACCESS TO SURFACE WATERS WHENEVER PRACTICABLE. ON SITE FUEL STORAGE TANKS OTHER THAN APPROVED PORTABLE FUEL CONTAINERS SUCH AS GASOLINE CANS, WILL HAVE A MEANS OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AND WILL BE LOCATED, WHENEVER PRACTICABLE, UNDERCOVER. ANY INADVERTENT SPILLS WILL BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY AND THE MATERIALS WILL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. G. RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OR OIL IN EXCESS OF REPORTABLE QUANTITIES IN STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WILL BE REPORTED AS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE CGP, AND THE SWPPP WILL BE MODIFIED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF LEARNING OF THE RELEASE. SWPPP MODIFICATIONS WILL BE RECORDED IN SECTION R TO REFLECT THE RELEASE, INCLUDING A DESCRIPTION OF THE RELEASE, THE CIRCUMSTANCES LEADING TO THE RELEASE AND THE DATE OF THE RELEASE. THE SWPPP MODIFICATION WILL ALSO IDENTIFY RESPONSES TO BE EMPLOYED FOR SUCH RELEASES AND MEASURES TO PREVENT THE REOCCURRENCE OF SUCH RELEASES. H. PORTABLE TOILETS ARE PROVIDED ON SITE. LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD. I. STRIPS OF MATURE VEGETATION SHALL BE PRESERVED WHENEVER POSSIBLE. J. CLEARING AND GRUBBING MATERIAL SHALL BE CHIPPED UP AND USED FOR EROSION CONTROL WHENEVER POSSIBLE. TBD 22. STORM WATER I CERTIFY UNDER PREPARED UNDER DESIGNED TO ASSURE THE INFORMATION WHO MANAGE THE THE INFORMATION, AND BELIEF, TRUE, SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT SIGNED: TBD POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THE OR THOSE PERSONS DIRECTLY SUBMITTED IS, TO THE AND COMPLETE. I AM AWARE SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION, FOR KNOWING VIOLATIONS 10/02/06 DATE. TBD ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE WITH A SYSTEM GATHERED AND EVALUATED PERSON OR PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR GATHERING BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THERE ARE INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY PENALTY MY DIRECTION THAT SUBMITTED. SYSTEM, THE INFORMATION ACCURATE, FOR KENNETH ADOLF, P.E. CERTIFIED EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL SPECIALIST (OWNER) I HAVE REVIEWED AND ACCEPT THE CONDITIONS OF THIS PLAN SIGNED: DATE: (CONTRACTOR) I HAVE REVIEWED AND ACCEPT THE CONDITIONS OF THIS PLAN SIGNED: DATE. 23. SWPPP MAP. SURFACE WATER. THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY DRAINAGE DITCH MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE TO ANY SURFACE WATER (WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER). J. TEMPORARY STOCKPILE LOCATIONS SHALL BE PLACE IN AREAS AWAY FROM SURFACE WATERS. 6. OTHER POTENTIAL STORM WATER POLLUTANTS: POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION AND WASTE MATERIALS THAT ARE USED OR STORED AT THE SITE ARE DESCRIBED IN THE SECTION. BY IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE BMPS, THE POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES ARE NOT REASONABLY EXPECTED TO AFFECT THE STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM THE SITE. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CHEMICALS AND WASTE MATERIALS THAT WILL BE USED OR STORED AT THE SITE POTENTIAL POLLUTANT Y OR N LOCATION CONTROL MEASURE ` ' MEDINA 2000 '005 _. `- - - � -- ' M ' 4. SITE CONSIDERATIONS: 4.1 AREAS OF CONCERN A. DISCHARGE TO WETLANDS & LAKE PETER B. GENERATION OF DUST C. TRACKING ONTO PUBLIC STREETS AND COUNTY & STATE ROADS D. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS E. WASHOUTS AROUND POND AND WETLAND AREAS F. STOCK PILES G. HIGH VOLUME DRAINAGE SWALES H. OTHER CONCERNS - IF APPLICABLE 5. CONTROL MEASURES: 5.1 AREAS OF CONCERN A. DISCHARGE TO WETLANDS & LAKE PETER THE PERIMETER OF ALL WETLANDS WILL BE SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE. IN AREAS WHERE THE ROADS WILL CUT THROUGH THE WETLANDS, PERIMETER CONTROL SHALL INCLUDE STRAW BALES PLACED END TO END WITH HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE AS A BACK UP. WATER MANAGEMENT. RAPID STABILIZATION AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS MAY NEED TO BE ADDED IF IT APPEARS THAT THEY ARE NECESSARY. B. GENERATION OF DUST DUST CONTROL MAY BECOME NECESSARY. WATER TRUCKS MAY BE REQUESTED IF IT IS NECESSARY. C. TRACKING ONTO PUBLIC STREETS AND COUNTY & STATE ROADS A ROCK ENTRANCE BERM HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HELP REDUCE VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS ONTO THE CITY STREETS. THE DEVELOPER WILL INSTALL INLET PROTECTION ON THE EXISTING STREETS AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MEDINA COUNTY WATER MANAGEMENT. D. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS ARE SHOWN ON THE SWPPP. E. WASHOUTS AROUND POND AND WETLAND AREAS SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER NEW POND & WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. IF APPLICABLE, ADDITIONAL STABILIZATION MAY BE REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MEDINA, 10. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS: THIS STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NPDES SDS GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH A / CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ALL OTHER APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SITE PLANS (OR PERMITS), OR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SITE PLANS (OR PERMITS) HAVE BEEN TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT AND ALL REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET. PROJECT ` LOCATION 11. STORM WATER DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS: HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN PERFORMED TO MODEL THE PROPOSED AND EXISTING DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE. SOIL DATA CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE SOIL BORINGS &GRADING SPECIFICATIONS. .ETT � P. 570 J �........ s � ' ' Y - \ ANTIFREEZE YES VARIOUS SECONDARY CONTAINMENT ASPHALT YES VARIOUS DIESEL FUEL YES VARIOUS SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FERTILIZER YES LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT GASOLINE YES IN EQUIPMENT SECONDARY CONTAINMENT GLUE/ADHESIVES YES CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE HYDRAULIC OIL/FLUIDS YES CONTRACTOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT PAINTS YES CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE GREASE YES CONTRACTOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SANITARY WASTE YES VARIOUS SERVICE PROVIDER TO SECURE UNITS FROM TIPPING OVER SOIL AMENDMENTS NO LANDSCAPING MATERIALS YES LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE OTHERS POSSIBLE 12. NON -STORM WATER MANAGEMENT: NON -STORM WATER DISCHARGES WILL BE ELIMINATED OR REDUCED TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THOSE NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. AUTHORIZED NON -STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM THIS SITE INCLUDE. 1. FIRE HYDRANT FLUSH INGS 2. WATER USED FOR DUST CONTROL PURPOSES 3. POTABLE WATER AND UNCONTAMINATED WATER LINE FLUSHING 4. UNCONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER OR SPRING WATER 5. UNCONTAMINATED EXCAVATION DEWATERING 6. STREET CLEANINGWHERE PERMITTED) ) THESE AUTHORIZED NON -STORM WATER DISCHARGES WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PHASE II PERMIT, AND EVERY EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO MINIMIZE NON -STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM THESE SITE ACTIVITIES. NON -STORM WATER DISCHARGES WILL BE DIRECTED TO TREATMENT PONDS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 7 CONTINUED SEE & MADSON, INC. SHEET 2 CO 2006 SCHOELL • 11-06-2006 • Hopkins, MN 55343 c N U • • CITY SUBMITTAL SWPPP PLAN • • • • PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMORIAL PARK 3365 STATE HIGHWAY 55 MEDINA, MN 55447 • 15050 23rd Avenue North LO M o O° ~ 71:17) M CV�CO CQ I ti Cn � CO" a3 a LL c o c co a o 6 o �4 -� �� Ecs) 1- Le �co ›..ti n _. � � .- Lc) W I- EP O -gi c -0 CO C73 :2EE N a) -5 W O c V c .schoellmadson.com 111 E >, CO Q 0, y co Q co -0 Y U m a, 0 N = 0 U � s c/D I rip I I I cn = ,_, m � .o m �� o E cn Ix � P-1 T.:c� � � cu rn I •�I I I 1 I . � a;,--1 in F 71 7 I I Ix = cm csz r€€;:€ f 'te 1.T'u t is r•;. Pit! r Bone WINRosene Ar iderl:ik '& Associates Arttait' .4 €�°€ v..»v " rT innrze run Boast« v RO5ene Anderlik Associates rP & Architects 0.5" 6 0Pn 01 Li rider r Inc 1 1 /2" R SIGN R7-8A COLORS: LEGEND AND BORDER — WHITE WHITE SYMBOL ON BLUE BACKGROUND BACKGROUND — BLUE REDUCE SPACING 50% SEE APPENDIX HE" FOR SYMBOL PROPORTIONS NOTE: SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS VARY: VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, COLOR, AND MOUNTING HEIGHTS, ETC. WITH LOCAL AND STATE AUTHORITIES. co 1 :,2 " 9 7 • O }, TO n hi tip C: utEir_ rd I iMpp r-€i.0 y LIE 1 4 to -,.yn. ,�?,=w„ nestroo irjoi Ros'�n Arid Associate's 6. Architects on strtio osene Anderlik .+'late: Engineers 6 Architects PARKING VEHICLE ID REQUIRED UP TO $200 FINE FOR VIOLATION SIGN R7-8A SIGN R7-8B VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN HANDICAP SIGN AND VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN NOT TO SCALE 4 fill' DIP N li € _E Filter' NIP ril ipt j under r:l i`E rvv»E"+fl i v.Er �E L:« .» r� !eye € °» +,? I-E€,„,Er_I a�'. ro:i rim t i I-€„i per SIGN, CENTER ON STALL TYPICAL RAMP LOCATION FACE OF CURB OR PAVEMENT MARKING PAINTED WHITE 4" STRIPE © 45° PAINTED WHITE LOCATION AND SIZE PER STATE STANDARDS IThis r s .0 45° sE n stroo Ros:ne �rcl.lk & Associates ;Archttects 5.0' TYPICAL 8.0' VAN ACCESSABLE >�o 8.0' (TYP.) HANDICAP PARKING STALL LAYOUT Din n TT pip BED() € t...} jrr..i I» i - FOR A.1\10 1 /4" STEEL BULLNOSE EDGES AND JOINTS CONCRETE SEALANT MEDIUM LOAD FACTOR w`f ^ut:si E�. ;pi'=`E„11...€a;€ rnet r« L!in is3.. x„ E "LOAD FAO' I -I : rid wr€di ,E:TO R L.A. ��.�E _.E-. w.E BROOM FINISH �5i:r r:k;iu'r, of rui���r�- I�—F�ItW' s��lt Onestroo Rosene AirrI'ik & Engineers Aratitectt Associates Fence Posit 5 Miln'::Irnum post length Maxiirriarri spot',i:ng between ,poste ` hire G ;tit c briE. Lay fabric lin the tr oh Fabrit anchorage, t.ren h,, Boall fili trench, with t'orriped nztural i11 al;€-'4 h: j, i' d jj, s „m�... su:xi€s �4 i_,E' SILT FENCE 1 /2" EXPANSION JOINT EVERY 60'(MAX.), PAVEMENT SECTIONS, BUILDING EDGE, AND CURB EDGE. EXPANSION JOINT TO INCLUDE EXPANSION CAP(ZIP STRIP), VINYLEX REMOVABLE CAP STRIP OR APPROVED EQUAL. CONTRACTION JOINT EVERY 6' OR PER PLAN. CAULK AT EXP. JOINTS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4" CONCRETE WALK WITH 6X6 10/10 WELDED WIRE MESH, DEPTH PER GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION. PROVIDE DOWELS BETWEEN PAVEMENT SECTIONS, AS DIRECTED BY OWNER. MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND (200 SF/GALLON) .D • .A �' g 0 • n u .n ice/ v�i//� //vv Y / /vj/v \//\\7? /\7 %/// /\// /\\� \ COMPACTED, APPROVED SUBGRADE 4" CL.-5, DEPTH PER GEOTECH N I CAL RECOMMENDATION TYPICAL SIDEWALK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PER POLE MNT. DETAIL NOT TO SCALE i 6' MIN. OR PER LOCAL CODES 42" 3611 SIGN BASE WHERE NOT PROTECTED BY CURB a SLEEVE EXTENDED 3" ABOVE GRADE WITH (3) TRIANGULAR SPACED HOLES FOR 3/8" DIA. ANCHORING BOLTS TRAFFIC SIGN, INCLUDING NO PARKING, HANDICAP PARKING, AND STOP SIGNS. HANDICAP LOCATIONS 2—SIDED WHERE STALLS FACE EACH OTHER. • 2" DIA. GALV. STEEL ROUND PIPE WITH CAP SET IN CONCRETE 6" DIA. GALV. STEEL PIPE, PAINTED (COLOR BY OWNER). FILL WITH NON —SHRINK GROUT WITH ROUND TOP. DOME TOP OF CON C. FOOTING JOINT FILLER PAVEMENT SURFACE //\ GALVANIZED \/ PIPE SLEEVE CONCRETE FOOTING —H18" DIA.H SIGN IN PARKING LOT OR DRIVE NOT TO SCALE c y; a.. c to with () silt Pence may be used but must be itista1:ed per M1'4Gf iT 36:86, 4 18" DIA. 6" DIA. STEEL PIPE —FILL WITH NON —SHRINK GROUT, ROUND TOP, AND PAINTED YELLOW(OR PER OWNER) DOME TOP OF CONC. FTG. SEALENT & BACKER ROD OVER 1" JOINT FILLER PAVEMENT SURFACE CONCRETE FOOTING 6'' DIAMETER BOLLARD FINISH GRADE 12" v 000 12" U NOT TO SCALE USED IN DEWATERING OF A PURGED WATER TABLE ENCASE AGGREGATE BACKFILL O — (MNDOT3149) IN TYPE I GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. LAP JOINTS. 0 — PROVIDE POSITIVE SLOPE O — TO MANHOLE. 4" PERF. DRAIN TILE WRAPPED IN TYPE I GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PERFORATED DRAIN TILE NOT TO SCALE p 2006 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. • \ 11-06-2006 N co 0 J \ • Hopkins, MN 55343 \ CITY SUBMITTAL ib H AW W t Cf� SITE & UTILITY DETAILS \ PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION: RISING SUN MEMMORIAL PARK \ 15050 23rd Avenue North ti 0 cn a) o c o c.o NJ- 0 co > CD , 0_ I— F 763-746-1699 CV CO ti LL .schoellmadson.com 111 E \ T Y 1, -� L T o = m m U GQ !Eg EIT !Eg Ci? I I Cip � .� -P--• a4 7,34 a o ›? ac_.)� .� � cfp U ( Q ,-, i--, -' P-, U I I r2 �� .�� a.) cd �1 I � I ni I i x = a, a, LEGAL DESCRIPTION NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTHEAST QUARTER All of Government Lot 1, Section 5, Township 118, Range 23, except the /�-OF NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, East 120 feet thereof, and also excepting that part lying North of the / TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23 Southerly right of way line of Highway No. 55, according to the U.S. NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTHEAST QUARTER L�/ Government survey thereof. _i ,� OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23 I 0=7°08'11 " NORTHEAST CORNER SECTION 5, Subject to restrictions reservations and easements of record if any. i---------------- 704.30 TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23 �\ y -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- GENERAL NOTES: 70 - ? 70 I 1. The bearing system used is assumed. _ 0.) 2 I //0 � \ ?°moo ����12"STEEL CULVE ---- ST �E ERLY R/G \� 2. The location of the underground utilities shown hereon, if any, are approximate only. °�� / / �0�9 ` ��'----- pER MNpOT NIGNwqY HOOF wAY I PURSUANT TOION A 216D CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT (612) 454-0002 PRIOR TO CO01 OANY FOUND IRON PIPE-, Nob- X/ % O �0�� ', \ ORpINATE M \ = 20- �/�O— '/ ��d,� O,s \ \ AP,I 3. Subject property is identified as being in Zone C, Area of Minimal Flooding on Flood ,70/9 1017. �_ — �'�C� 1 12" ST AND "Zone A, Area of 100-year Flooding"Insurance Rate Map, Community -Panel No. 270171 -� - -�- - . EEL CULVE 1 0001, effective date September 3, 1980. _ - -�- �- RT o o , 8 -_�p``� ,�,�p�� I 4. Zoning = Presently RR (Rural Residential) per City of Medina. / �17 Oj6 _- - 1014 - - °J �O� J.\ �O� \ \ II FOUND IRON PIPE \ ► -� _ - -- i ° \ I <�/ 5. Setback requirements per City of Medina 1 % / \ 1013. / O, ,�, / / / _ _ 10 - _ - ��` Oo,,5 \QJ I Front = 150 feet from centerline or 100 feet from property line (THE GREATER OF) �0 '/ " / //\4T/E[R U / / - - - - '� O Rear = 40 feet / '\ 1�6 - - �s- _ 10 - '� O ,�O O CENTERLINE OF STATE HIGHWAY N0. 55-7 f�. - - - ,r - , Side = 20 feet 9�j�/ �„ I / / / \ I I r- _ _ _ _ _ _ _10pg ,�b �00 `�° p� S 1 l7 L8�O W Lake front = 75 feet from OHWM (UNKNOWN ELEVATION) Go AC-7 � ,SS/ ° ! I� \ ---_— -- — o° o� 20.00 \=551 49 r-�,�p� .-O�j \0'�\ X, °9 �O \ ' - _ _ _� =100 _ '� �� �° �' \ i 6. Site area including wetland = 1,255,539 square feet = 28.134 acres. 9 -� 0 - - ,b \ / Site area not including wetland = 657,788 square feet = 15.101 acres. FINIS FLOOR Q / > >° / cb-0_ \ / oos_ _ ooz o R=5634.58 / 91 EL =1019.23 10 '� 8 1005 - �j0 / ' O° �° \ , � \0 FINISH L�OR- - X \ XX, \ - _ - % -6s �' '` \ 7. This survey was made on the ground. \ °� ELE .= 06.93 `�X \ O \'� \ \ \\ \ \................ — -— ; PROPANE I i� �-- - O / o I __ ---- \ i 8. No current title work was furnished for the preparation of this survey, legal description, TANK - = I // / •s O i �O , ° q' \ %\ \\ \ \ \ u - - , I P P Y I g P q, Od, OO w °- o \\\\ \\ \\\ �� �� 1 - - - O� �- - `b / \ recorded or unrecorded easements and encumbrances are subject to revision upon receipt of 7GG9 E _-� / -6� - °� s 8 F�IISHED FLOOF�� o / O i 6' \\ 1 r I I ����-� - /� / \ \ current title work. / sX, . � � � loos — „— � 1% � �— . moo / / a, � I l l l 1)/ ) I) r � � i--4 � 0 — , �� �' 05.8 q, - - /.moo / '//_'k \,_ g99_ a, �� , o,� \ 9. Elevation datum is based on NGVD 1929 data. 1007_0 _1'` `1005= `a / i / // / // / ///� /yam` -%��� ����� _ _ O� .b Bench mark is located top railroad spike, north side power pole, 40 feet NW Pioneer Trail & ��- - °O �� 1006 / ///�~' /'/ ��' //;�� �� - ` O \ 18 feet south of centerline railroad tracks PER PLAT "COVEY RUN") O \O�/°' / �........,.., -� ����Elevation = 988.86 / \ IImo, 28 �� AT R WEtL—#�" I N / /o," / / / / 1 \ \ ��� \ FINISHED FLOOR 8 IcuZ 1 /////o, /o� ////o// �j �70.8 °' �° ' ��, / -N- '`-'-�-�2- STEEC U�VE�T�' ! i \� Cb 994- 459 CO: �o� �/ ai r\ -_ , oo(�24` / 9.998�g91��/i O 10031 1 p / O - -- - �% _� /O�.l , - /ice i/ / / ° \? i - - ' - - , - /o,°i ii 9� j j 8y i 0 6' / SO() \ CS \ - / / i //// �i / �// ob�\ _ 99 / /''1 % // /�i/////// / / - 912 / 6s R MND N wA Y OF W �o�' \ I z \-��--- = J l -�// /i/j�i�/O / �� / O� 0T CON0. S AY O \\ \ ORp/N 5 \,..:.i��`it'� Il \ 9 r aim \ / / �J / 99 i i / W //j - �MAP � x ,� \°° °° Y/ / / // / / , / \\�� ' — \ \ \ \ \ \ I FOUND - 9 \ O° / �o i �?9 / / / EDGE MARSH -T___ 01' IRON PIPE co Cb 9II'�\I-rI /o0�0/ // / l/ /�/I l II / ol l �I /III //I�I�I/I /lII/l/I^ I g1�/✓�l I //� �// /'/ / �1�,�1/�/ 7 '\ rn �II I\IIlo 9— o�III I IbllIl 1Il I\ll IIll \I1 11III I lI II I xII 987\.7 iO -967- °/ 09 999,y- ' 9144 -?X ;o N-I°X999.6 h °° Ix987.8 \ \ ou \II \ / i �\o �� €-PTI AIR ,� I 1 / 1�/ / o ° ° 0 c\ix I I I \ \ 1 \ / / / / / / o / �o // ��s `b� \\\\\ \\\ 1� �9 \\ \ \\ \ \�' �� /r I / I � / �'/ �, -_�-EDGE MARSH i � \ �. s\ \ \ \ � � III ► � � l i /s\�� - LEGEND o°`19 9 \ \\' \ tI�� g- �O`O \ • Property Monument 9 ConcreteW dlt / ° Do Ln 0nces 111IT I °. .� L _ °•� i I Concrete Curb 984. s� \\ 9R 1 I I I I I IIII I �� \ / - _ s---- EAST LINE OF 1 —o\\\ \ `-� I I I I I�1 I I I I 1 1 I\ y� I �, — i-----120 ----I — U oNd- __ �� \\\ \ �3�(�- - �q I i I I 6,1 I I Q7 �I SEC. 5, T.118, R..23 W Overhead Electric �3.3 \ o I I o 1111 �/ \ I s •� I / — — g \ \y /I I I I I I�I�� I �� _-% I 9 —sBL Building Setback Line Edge \�6��\\IIIIIIIII/I1 I 1� o ---�.I► Ed e Marsh Power Pole �\ °°% \ to U Guy Wire Anchor981.5XQ0 9 WETLAND DELINE0, ATE BY OTHERS LOCATED ON 1/19/2006 I ® Air Conditioning Unit 1006.4 980.9,70 �Z� Z I Deciduous Tree (Diameter in Inches) V19 C, \ & I ��/ / / ��* I 1 11 1�.ol / / 1'� z LLJ Coniferous Tree Diameter in Inches ,70 O \ \ \ \ \ \ 9v 1 9 \l 9� �� (, I 0 , \ \`\ 1�\IIII III ,�'' � � � \` \ � ' i WEST LINE OF EAST 120 FEET _� � _ - - - - - Light Pole 6\ \ \ - - - 906 ExistingContour SEC.5, T.118, R.23 y'' X 851.27G Existing Spot Elevation Gutter \� titK//i ��� — \\ i \ I X 934.3 ExistingSot Elevation Wet Land Delineation 00 o',�///%% I I I I,I 111. I I I \ < /► W ro 80 40 O 80 160 240 o/ o ///�'/ �I �,\ ; I 5C ALE IN FEET g 446'IIII IIII \ \� \ \ I \ I Ih�°'///'//� I11111111111 IIII oo. ° 4 ) IIIIIIII/'LrQ _ W 000` / // / EDGE MARSH , WATER ELEVATION - 964.1 I ��01 �I DECEMBER 16, 2003 — — — — — — — — �, I/////I/ 1 I ► IIII / 83 �1 I I 1 \ \ \ \ \\\ \ 1 — ,0) / o�IIII IIII I III IIII 1 � I ---- ---- I / /IIII / / /// / / I I I III \ ��\\ \\\ \0\ \ 1 F / FOUND IRON PIPES \ \ (11'// / / / J / I \ \ \ \ q� / SEE IRON PIPE DETAIL / VICINITY MAP ST 0 0 yWY NO = z ss -i SITE zo U.S. HWY. NO. 12 0 I NOT TO SCALE FOUND IRON PIPE1���� �� \\sue\\\ 0\\\\ �\ �,� ON S. LINE OF PLAT �° `��\�\\\\ \ \ 1) /`// / // ////'// / / I I I 1 I I F66�� �\ �\ \\\�� 06' \\\ 9� '�-_- \ \�_� / '` OHO / \ OF COVEY RUN �rl / )11i1/1/ill lllll ll l it �� / � � ��\ `� \\\ ��6 \ � � \ �o� / 0b - \ �� \ / SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 5 AND AT FENCE CORNER `� /// IIII I\ =� / AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF COVEY RUN \ / / /�/ ���' III ' I I �I sB I 6' 1t j 'T 1� �I \ _ \\ �;�—-__ I WATER FOUND IRON PIPE \ i '� I I I I x 1 1 I \ 90.irx��\\=� y -_ I 1 I........ ...... ......... 1 ..: � \..... .i �. ........ � \........ ....... \ --'-n ____. „[ti .._n. _....... .:::. \ % / / / / ter. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ... ..- � -. \ OUTLOT A ,MITI � L� \ �\� 9 9� 6� O ► I T \ ►��~� �.�� 1s / o �, I— N 89058 39 W 1216.11 FOUND IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND IRON PIPE \` �� /i`b4� ` Off. 7O ,\ � \ / / ) / / / �� �` 0.25 �� 28. "� ON FENCE LINE I T� �� °� O O° �g X9 9 /�s ` FOUND IRON PIPE i I 58 , ALONG ABANDON FENCE _ J� ---- .s 6' Q 7 �F .6 O O �- ) I / �� ,- LIES 6.2 FEET SOUTH OF Sly FOUND 7.36' S. OF `� O / O �\ (SEE IRON PIPE DETAIL I 5 9 ,.FENCE 6.2 FEET SOUTH OF-�� LINE OF PLAT OF COVEY RUN I SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 5 I FOUND IRON PIPE -- FOUND IRON PIPE FENCE LINE LIES 6.7 ��\ LOT 1 PROPERTY LINE PER FENCE LINE LIES 6.2' AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF COVEY RUN I I FEET SOUTH OF Sly __� ��_ PROPERTY LINE PER �`- FOUND MONUMENTATION / \``_ FEET SOUTH OF Sly \ I LINE OF PLAT PLAT OF COVEY RUN g 0 K 3 LIES ALONG EXISTING FENCE LINE LINE OF PLAT / OF COVEY RUN COVEY RUN / OF COVEY RUN \ / FENCE LINE / ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE \ I R 0 N P I P E D E TA L / NO SCALE ------------ REVISIONS hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Thomas E. Hodorff, L.S. Minnesota Reg. No. 23677 Date: -December 16, 2003 -- CERTIFIED SURVEY 111 0 HENNEPIN COUNTY HARRY S. JOHNSON CO., INC. LAND SURVEYORS