Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout02-2007CITY OF MEDINA 2052 COUNTY ROAD 24 MEDINA, MN 55340 AGENDA MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY February 13, 2007 7:00 P.M. MEDINA CITY HALL 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comments 3. Update from City Council proceedings 4. City Planner's Report 5. Approval of January 9, 2007 Planning Commission minutes 6. RJ Ryan Company, Peter Hasselquist — Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure over 3000 sq. ft. in the Rural Residential (RR) zoning district — 2705 Willow Drive (PID 16-118-23-41-0004). Previously Postponed Public Hearing 7. United Properties, Pettibone Properties — Site Plan, Preliminary Plat, Variances, and Conditional Use Permit for construction of a commercial development in the Uptown Hamel (UH) zoning district — 3575 Sioux Drive (PID 12-118-23-41-0004). Public Hearing 8. Three Rivers Park District — Amended Conditional Use Permit for an addition to a structure at the Near Wilderness Site — South of County Road 24, West of Homestead Trail (PID 20-118-23-21-0003). Public Hearing (To be tabled until March Planning Commission meeting) 9. Schedule representation for 2007 City Council meetings (third Tuesday of each month) 10. Brief Updates from the Open Space Task Force (R. Reid) and Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel (D. Dickerson) 11. Adjourn Posted in City Hall February 9, 2007 Agenda Item No. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING REPORT Medina Planning Commission Jennifer Haskamp, Landform through Chad Adams, City Administrator February 8, 2007 for the February 13, 2007 Planning Commission Meeting United Properties. Request for approval of a Site Plan, CUP, and Variances for Uptown Hamel Retail Development at 3575 Sioux Drive (Ferrel Gas Property) for a multi -use retail development. REVIEW DEADLINE: April 18, 2007 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat, site plan, conditional use permit (CUP) and 5 variances to allow the construction of a 16,250-square foot retail development. The development consists of a multi -tenant retail building, a freestanding coffee shop and a credit union. Both the coffee shop and credit union are proposing a drive -through use associated with each business. The development will be accessible by a new frontage road that will serve as a public street for the development and will intersect with Sioux Drive. The frontage road will be developed to serve the proposed development and will also dedicate an easement for future connections to properties west of the Ferrelgas site. In the Uptown Hamel (UH) zoning district a CUP is required when a drive -through is proposed. Variances will be required to allow the drive aisle of the drive -through service businesses to encroach within the 100-foot setback from an improved interesting street, 300-foot setback from State Highway 55 and the 100-foot setback form an active railroad track. Each of these variances will be discussed further in the following analysis. There are two variances associated with Elm Creek including a variance from 25% maximum impervious surface requirements and encroachment within the 50-foot native vegetation buffer from Elm Creek. 2. CONTEXT: A. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat, a site plan and a CUP is limited to whether or not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve these applications. The City has a high level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show hardship and compliance with the intent of the ordinance United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 2 February 8, 2007 B. Zoning and Land Use The subject property is guided Mixed -Use in the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned Uptown Hamel (UH). The purpose of the Uptown Hamel zoning district is to create an attractive and pedestrian -friendly mixed -use town center district. The Uptown Hamel District includes areas on the north and south side of the SOO railroad line. The District has two distinct areas with different characteristics. The area around Hamel Road on the south side of Highway 55 and the railroad has a small town, quaint feel, and although within proximity to Highway 55, the area is separated from the highway by a large grade change. The topographic change creates a different character depending on the proximity of the site within the district to Highway 55. The proposed development is located in the part of the district that fronts on Highway 55 and has a more commercial and auto oriented quality than the area surrounding Hamel Road. Staff understands that the purpose of UH zoning designation is to promote greater attention to design and a cohesive concept for the Uptown Hamel area. The UH zoning designation focuses on pedestrian scale elements and walkable development. The City has developed other parcels along the Highway 55 corridor with UH design standards and has required that such designs integrate pedestrian scale elements and walkable development with accessibility and safe flow of traffic. C. Surrounding Uses The property to the east of the site across Sioux Drive and the property to the south of the site across the SOO Line Railroad right-of-way are also guided Mixed -Use and zoned UH. The property directly west of the site and the property to the north of the site across State Highway 55 are guided Commercial Campus and zoned Urban Commercial. The area along Highway 55, regardless of zoning designations, has a commercial and auto -oriented feel. The City is in the process of developing the Medina Clydesdale Marketplace PUD which is across Highway 55 from the proposed development site. Clydesdale Marketplace was developed under a PUD and upheld many of the UH design standards while introducing more stringent architectural and design standards to ensure a more comprehensive, interesting and high quality development. The PUD also allowed for some variation from the UH zoning because of the auto -oriented nature of the site. This site is located north of the proposed site across Highway 55. C. Natural Characteristics of the Site There is a wetland complex on the north portion of the site. Elm Creek, a protected watercourse, runs east -west through this wetland complex. There are also wetland complexes in the southwest portion of the site and directly to the south of the site. There are some large trees scattered throughout the site that have been identified on the tree inventory plan. The southeast portion of the site has been disturbed by the Ferrell Gas Company and consists of both gravel and bituminous surfaces and multiple buildings and accessory structures. As stated in the Engineer's memo dated January 26, 2007, a geotechnical report should be submitted by the applicant to indicate if any contaminating soils are present on the site. United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 3 February 8, 2007 The site is located directly north of the SOO Railroad line which creates a barrier on the southern boundary of the site. In addition, significant challenges result due to the large topographic change that occurs just south of the site. The proposed development site is at the bottom of the hill which connects to the historic Uptown Hamel area. The topographic change significantly alters the ability to unite the proposed site with the remainder of the UH district because visually the sites are not connected. The subject property and properties adjacent to the site are small and are constrained by the railroad, Highway 55, and topographic challenges which will likely make development of these properties challenging without variances and other special considerations. 3. BACKGROUND: In November of 2006, the Applicant prepared a Concept Plan which was reviewed by the City. The City provided the applicant with informal comments and suggestions. Generally the City was comfortable and supportive of the proposed development. The City had some concerns regarding the Concept Plan and requested some changes be made for the formal preliminary plat and site plan submittal. The following items summarize some of those comments: • The City requested a design that integrated a variety of users and building scales. The proposed development now includes a freestanding coffee shop, a multi -tenant retail building, and a credit union. • Originally, the scale and quantity of retail development appeared a bit overwhelming for the site. The Applicant responded by reducing the amount of retail development in the Concept Plan from approximately 17,100 to 16,250 for this submittal. • At the request of the City, the bank building has been reoriented and the drive -through has been relocated to the south end of the building and as now fully screened from Highway 55. • The overall architecture and design of the buildings has been improved with 4-sided architecture. The proposed credit union has "railroad depot" architectural theme, and the other structures utilize similar architectural elements to create a cohesive development. • The City requested that pedestrian scale elements, paths, and outdoor plaza areas be integrated within the development. The Applicant responded with increased plaza spaces, canopies and awnings and walkways throughout the development. 4. ANALYSIS: Consistency with Ordinance Standards Preliminary Plat The subject 3.91-acre site will be subdivided to create 3 new commercial lots. The lots will be 0.97-acres, 0.47-acres and 1.08-acres in size. There are no minimum lot area and lot width standards in the UH district. United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 4 February 8, 2007 Wetlands There is a wetland complex on the north portion of the site. Elm Creek, a protected watercourse, runs east -west through this wetland complex. There are also wetland complexes in the southwest portion of the site and directly to the south of the site. The proposed site plan does not appear to impact the wetland areas. A wetland delineation report was prepared by the Applicant, and should be approved by the ECWMC. The storm water management plan must also be approved by the ECWMC to ensure that the wetland areas will be protected. As requested in the Engineer's memo dated January 26, 2007, final plans should include a detailed Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPP) for review and approval by the City. Woodlands There are some large trees scattered throughout the site that have been identified on the tree inventory plan. The majority of the trees on the site are low -quality, soft -wood species and will be removed as part of this project. Many of the trees that will be removed are located where the proposed buildings are located and along the proposed ROW. Additional trees will be added to the site as part of the project and will include a variety of overstory trees, evergreens and ornamental trees. Shoreland The site is located within the 300-foot shoreland overlay district of Elm Creek. As a result of the sites proximity to the creek, impervious surface is restricted to a maximum of 25% of the total site area. The proposed development will require a variance to exceed the 25% maximum impervious surface shoreland requirement. The proposed redevelopment will increase the total impervious area from approximately 36.8% of the site to 60% of the site. The variance request must be reviewed in accordance with the standards outlined in Section 825.45 of the Zoning Ordinance, which are discussed in detail later in this report. Creek Channel The ECWMC requires a 50-foot native vegetation buffer from Elm Creek for all new developments. The proposed retaining wall at the northeast corner of the site encroaches within 20-feet of Elm Creek. ECWMC recommends that the buffer distance be increased by eliminating four parking spots at the northeast corner of the site and moving the retaining wall closer to the curb. This alternative would maintain a 40-foot buffer and would be acceptable to ECWMC provided that the applicant obtains a variance from ECWMC. However, the Applicant is seeking a variance to allow the retaining wall to remain in the current location because the proposed development will need the parking identified on the plan. Reducing the parking by four parking stalls is not acceptable for the amount of proposed development. Floodplain A portion of the floodplain for Elm Creek is located along the north end of the site. ECWMC recommends that the proposed retaining wall at the northeast corner of the property should be moved farther away from Elm Creek to avoid any floodplain impacts and to preserve the natural creek buffer. However, as previously stated the Applicant is seeking a variance to allow the United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 5 February 8, 2007 retaining wall to remain in the location proposed to preserve the parking that would be lost as a result of relocating the retaining wall. Site Plan The proposed development must be consistent with the provisions in the ordinance and the Uptown Hamel Concept Plan, which has been adopted into the ordinance. Building Setbacks The required structure setbacks in the UH zoning district are as follows: Front, minimum: Front, maximum: Side, minimum with no outside openings: Side, minimum with outside openings: Rear, minimum: From protected watercourse: 0 feet 10 feet 0 feet 12 feet 12 feet 100 feet The intent of the setback requirements is to bring the building and its activity closer to the street to make the street visually interesting, functionally more enjoyable and useful and economically more viable. The maximum front yard setback will not apply to this property due to the size of the development parcel. The proposed site plan complies with all of the setback requirements. Building Size The total ground floor areas for any business building or business shall not exceed 20,000 square feet in the UH district. The proposed multi -tenant retail building will be 8,400 square feet, the coffee shop building will be 1,850 square feet and the credit union building will be 6,000 square feet. The total ground floor area will be 16,250 square feet and therefore complies with the regulations of the zoning district. Streets and Access The proposed development will be accessible from a new public street that will function as a frontage road to the proposed development that will intersect with Sioux Drive to east of the project site. The proposed frontage road will include dedicated ROW to allow for future connections with parcels west of the proposed site. As the parcels develop west of Sioux Drive the intent is that the street will function as a frontage road to Highway 55 in the future. The street must be designed to comply with all applicable City street standards. The City Engineer's memo dated January 26, 2007 clearly identifies the outstanding traffic issues with the proposed development. All items identified in the memo should be addressed and updated for review by the City Engineer prior to final approval. The plans and traffic analysis should be resubmitted to MnDOT for final review and comment. United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 6 February 8, 2007 Parking and Traffic Circulation The proposed site plan shows approximately 1 space per 200 gross square feet (82 spaces). Chapter 828 of the Zoning Ordinance identifies performance standards for off-street parking requirements in the City. The ordinance requires 1 space per 150 square feet of building area or 108 spaces for this development. The Uptown Hamel zoning district allows parking reductions because of the irregular and small size of many parcels in the district. This site is constrained by Highway 55, the creek and associated buffers and the Railroad to the south. Staff supports the proposed parking provided and agrees that the number of stalls is adequate for the amount of development. Landscaping The proposed landscape plan shows 16 overstory trees, 12 ornamental trees, 3 evergreens and 92 shrubs. The majority of the plantings will be along Sioux Drive and the new public street. The proposed landscaping will visually enhance the entrance to the development and screen the drive -through uses from the street. The ordinance requires at least 5% of the site to be plaza area or landscaped. The plaza area detail is not provided, and it is unknown what materials are proposed for the plaza area. This should be clarified and included in the plans to verify if the plaza will include vegetation or pavers, or if it is impervious surface. Plaza Space and Site Amenities A small plaza/outdoor seating area is shown on the plans adjacent to the proposed coffee shop. The applicant should submit hardscape, plaza furniture, lighting and landscape details for the plaza/outdoor seating area. The plaza should include a well-defined pedestrian connection and crossing from the plaza area to the public sidewalk along the new street and to the adjacent buildings. At least 20% of the plaza should consist of pervious surfaces. The Site Plan indicates that the entire plaza or patio area will be concrete; this should be modified to meet the 20% pervious surface requirement. The Applicant could meet this requirement by adding vegetation or pervious pavers. Sidewalks and Trails The proposed site plan identifies a sidewalk along the proposed road and along Sioux Drive. The site plan also indicates a sidewalk along the north side of each building, and also indicates pedestrian crossings on the new frontage road. The site plan should include more pedestrian crossings to the sidewalk along Sioux Drive as it is unlikely that a pedestrian will walk around to the south side of the development, and they are more likely to cross through the development on the north side of the development. A safe pedestrian connection should be made to cross the drive aisle associated with the credit union. In addition a pedestrian crossing should be made between the credit union and the coffee shop on the north side of the buildings. The UH zoning district requires pedestrian scale development and walkable design. The overall sidewalk system throughout the development should be improved for additional connections and increased pedestrian safety, and pedestrian access should be considered from all sides of the development. United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 7 February 8, 2007 Garbage and Mechanical Equipment The architectural plans show enclosed garbage areas in the Credit Union and the multi -tenant retail building. The proposed coffee shop does not identify an area for trash collection. It is assumed that it is the intent for the coffee shop to share a trash collection area with the credit union. However, for the coffee shop to use the trash collection area at the credit union the employee would need to cross both the drive -through aisle and the entrance road to the development. This is unreasonable, and likely to be unsafe for the coffee shop employees. The Applicant should identify a trash collection area at the coffee shop to mitigate this potential issue. The Applicant should modify their plans to include an internal trash collection area in the coffee shop. The mechanical equipment is not identified on the plans. It is assumed that all mechanical equipment will be located within the structures. This should be verified and included on the plans for verification. Lighting The lighting plan is demonstrated on sheet A1.2 of the architectural plans. The plans also include a detail of a decorative light fixture and a shoebox fixture that would be located throughout the development. The color of the proposed light fixtures should be provided and should be consistent with the lighting throughout the Uptown Hamel district. The property is classified as Lighting Zone E4, and has a pre -curfew maximum lighting level at the property line of 1.5 foot candles and post -curfew maximum of 0.6 foot candles. The proposed plan demonstrates the foot-candles at pre -curfew levels and all areas at the property line meet this standard. Signage The proposed structures identify wall signage. The proposed signage, once solidified, must meet the sign matrix presented in section 815.17 Subd. 2 of the Zoning Code. The signs proposed on the plans would meet the sign area requirements as designed. Building Orientation The buildings are located on the south side of the site and are located along the new street (frontage road). The proposed buildings are primarily oriented to be visible from Highway 55. The Uptown Hamel District is focused on creating a pedestrian scale development and walkable areas; however, this particular site is primarily focused on the relationship of the development with Highway 55. As discussed previously, the topography of the area makes it challenging to unite this development with the rest of Uptown Hamel. As a result, the natural orientation is towards Highway 55 because of high traffic volumes, visibility and ultimately viability of the businesses as a result. United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 8 February 8, 2007 Building Architecture The architecture of the proposed development is anchored by the credit union which is the largest building on the site. The following descriptions will discuss each of the buildings on the proposed site. Credit Union — Building "A" The credit union was developed with a Rail Depot quality in mind Rather than ignore the rail line, the goal was to embrace the railroad and integrate it within the site. The proposed credit union includes a variety of materials including stucco, concrete masonry block and stones. The proposed structure is also represented on the attached rendering which identifies a color palate for the building. The warm colors of the materials will compliment the site and will provide an inviting quality to the development and the pedestrian. The plans demonstrate that over 15% of each side of the building will have windows which will improve the massing of the structure. The north elevation has 39% of the facade dedicated to windows which adds to the depot quality of the structure. Coffee Shop — Building `B" The proposed coffee shop echoes the architecture of the credit union particular with the roof detail while introducing some more modern details. The materials on the coffee shop are similar to those on the credit union, with the majority being brick. The east and south side of the building have very minimal glass, and Staff would recommend additional glass (spandrel acceptable) to help with massing on the facades. This building does not reflect the four-sided architectural quality required in the Uptown Hamel district. There should be additional modulation included to increase the four-sided quality of the structure. The east facade does not provide an entrance or exit. As the site is proposed, the garbage for the coffee shop is at the credit union which is east of the structure. As previously stated, it is recommended that garbage be located in the coffee shop, but if there is no other solution, at a minimum an efficient way to access the trash is necessary. Retail - Building "C" The multi -tenant retail building shows potentially 7 businesses located within the building. The two end -cap users have pitched roofs that echo the Credit Union roof line. The center users have qualities that integrate the coffee shop design. The proposed materials and color palate are consistent throughout the development and include stucco, siding, stone and brick. A large percentage of each facade includes glass which will help contribute to the four sided architectural quality of the structure. It should be noted that siding is not a listed material in the ordinance and an alternate material should be considered. In addition, to enhance the pedestrian quality of the south elevation the end cap users should provide access to pedestrians on this facade. Doors are shown for each tenant but this side should provide access to pedestrians at a minimum on the end caps. Retaining Walls A detail of the proposed retaining walls should be provided prior to final approval. There are two retaining walls identified and both should use consistent materials with the rest of Uptown Hamel. Stone or other architectural interesting materials should be used to present a cohesive development. Architectural details, including color, scale and materials should be submitted. United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 9 February 8, 2007 Screening Drive -through areas, loading facilities, recycling and trash facilities, roof -top and ground equipment will require the appropriate screening. According to the landscape plan screening is provided at the coffee shop and some screening is provided at the south east corner of the development to soften the view to the credit union drive -through. The proposed plans do not identify the location of mechanical systems for each of the buildings. It is assumed that these will be contained within the structure and will not be located on the roof or outside. If equipment is proposed outside of the structure, plans will need to be submitted with the appropriate screening for review. Conditional Use Permit A CUP is required in the UH district to allow the proposed drive -through uses for the coffee shop and the credit union. The City shall consider the following relevant factors as outlined in Section 825.39. of the City's Zoning Ordinance when reviewing a conditional use permit: Subd. 1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. The adjacent railroad and state highway right-of-ways and wetland areas isolate the site from surrounding property and uses. Staff finds that the potential for negative impacts from the drive - through uses are minimal. Subd. 2. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. The proposed development and the drive -through uses are generally compatible with the concept plan for the overall Uptown Hamel district. The new frontage road that will be constructed as part of this project will allow the properties to the west of the site to redevelop in the future. Subd. 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. The proposed development will be accessible from a new public frontage road that will intersect with Sioux Drive. The proposed development will be served by adequate municipal sewer and water infrastructure. An on -site stormwater management pond will be constructed to accommodate drainage from the site. Subd. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. The proposed development includes a total of 82 parking spaces on the site. Staff finds that the total amount of parking is sufficient for the mix of uses within the development. There are no designated loading areas shown on the plans. Loading areas are optional in the UH district. If designated loading areas are provided the plans should be revised to show these areas. United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 10 February 8, 2007 Subd. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. The proposed drive-in businesses must also comply with the performance standards outlined in Section 828.57 and Section 834.07 Subd. 6(a) of the City's Zoning Ordinance, which are intended to prevent nuisances and disturbances commonly associated with drive -through uses. The ordinance requires refuse receptacles at all exits as well as 1 refuse receptacle per 10 vehicle parking spaces with the parking area and lighting must be designed to have no direct source of light visible from a public right-of-way or adjacent land -uses. A detailed lighting and refuse disposal plan should be submitted to show compliance with these requirements. The drive-in services must also not be used between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6 a.m. These have been included as conditions of approval. Subd. 6. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. Staff finds that the coffee shop and bank with drive -through uses are reasonable related to the overall goals of the City to provide a mix of retail uses within the City. Subd. 7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. Staff finds that the proposed drive -through uses are consistent with the purpose of the zoning code and the UH district standards provided that the conditions listed at the end of this report are met. Subd. 8. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City. Staff finds that the proposed use is consistent with policy plans of the City to encourage redevelopment of the Uptown Hamel district. Subd. 9. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. The site plan shows an adequate amount of stacking for the drive -through driveways. Staff finds that the proposed uses will not cause a traffic hazard or congestion. Subd. 10. Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. As stated above, the relatively isolated nature of the site greatly decreases the potential for negative impacts on surrounding uses. Staff finds that the architectural design of the proposed development is compatible and complimentary to the existing buildings in the Uptown Hamel area and the conceptual overall plan. United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 11 February 8, 2007 Subd. 11. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project. The applicant intends construct the credit union building during the first phase and the coffee shop and retail building during the second and third phases. Subd. 12. Officer. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning The applicant has provided proof of ownership of the property to the City. Variances The proposed development will require the following variances: • A variance to exceed the 25% maximum impervious surface shoreland requirement. The proposed development will increase the total impervious surface from approximately 36.8% of the site to 60% of the site. • A variance to allow the retaining wall to encroach 30 feet on the vegetative buffer on Elm Creek. • A variance to allow the driveway to the drive-in service businesses (the coffee shop and the credit union building) to encroach 80 feet within the 100-foot setback from an improved interesting street. • A variance to allow the driveway to the drive-in service business associated with the coffee shop to encroach 120 feet within the 300-foot setback from State Highway 55. • A variance to allow the driveway to the drive-in service business associated with the credit union to encroach 20 feet within the 300-foot setback from State Highway 55. The Planning Commission must review the variance request with the standards outlined in Section 825.45 of the Zoning Ordinance as follows: A) Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and result from lot size shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owner of property since enactment of the Ordinance, have had no control. The proposed site has an irregular shape and is constrained on three sides: Highway 55 on the north, Sioux Drive on east and the SOO line railroad to the south. In addition, Elm Creek crosses through the northern portion of the property which further reduces the buildable area on the property and prompts the ECWMC's impervious surface requirements and creek setbacks. B) The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance. The literal interpretation of the Ordinance would prevent the applicant from constructing the drive-in service businesses on the site. The shoreland requirement limits the intensity and quantity of development on the site. The ECWMC has recommended mitigative actions to United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 12 February 8, 2007 address the variances requested by the Applicant. Other properties under similar circumstances have also been provided with mitigative options. C) That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The existing site has is owned and operated by Ferrellgas for industrial uses. The special circumstances are a result of the lot constraints due to Highway 55, Sioux Drive and the SOO rail line. D) That granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to the owners of other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. The proposed development is located on a site that is dissimilar from others within the Uptown Hamel district. A small number of sites in Uptown Hamel are located between Highway 55 and the railroad which makes them unique from others in the district. E) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The drive -through lane is located an adequate distance from the intersection of the new frontage road and Sioux Drive. As requested by the City, the drive -through for the Credit Union is located behind the structure. With respect to impervious cover, if the development were not under the constraints of the shoreland district requirements, the site could have up to 90% hardcover in the UH district. The proposed development has 65% hardcover which is significantly less. The Applicant has also provided a ponding area that will contain all surface water runoff onsite to ensure that the post development conditions are better than pre - development. F) The variance requested would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Ordinance or to property in the same zone. The driveway will not conflict with the operations of the railroad track or State Highway 55. A new public street (frontage road) will be constructed to accommodate traffic from the development. The purpose of the shoreland impervious surface requirement is to prevent stormwater run-off into the Creek and the proposed development includes a storm water management pond that will capture all surface water onsite. Storm water management requirements of the ECWMC will need to be met prior to final approval. United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 13 February 8, 2007 5. CONCLUSION: The proposed development is largely consistent with the goals of the Uptown Hamel district. The development supports the desire to increase commercial and retail development within the district and the Highway 55 corridor. Overall the architectural quality of the development is consistent with the goals of the district including the depot character of the credit union which ties the development to the SOO line. Other elements such as the storm water management pond, dedicated road easements for future frontage road expansion will contribute to the overall success of the project and the area. The plans should be updated to meet the overall engineering and design requirements of the zoning district. These requirements will be highlighted as conditions for approval in the following sections. 6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the proposed development supports the overall desire of the Uptown Hamel District to redevelop and diversify retail and commercial uses. With respect to the overall site plan and development stronger pedestrian connections and internal circulation should be improved to enhance the overall quality of the site. It would be reasonable for the Planning Commission to either deny or approve the proposed site plan, preliminary plat, CUP and variances due to the complex nature of the proposal. Most of the variances are due to the drive - through uses located on the site. Staff finds that the drive -through uses on this site pose no immediate issue to adjacent roads or development, and the variances are largely due to the site constraints. However, it is the Applicant's responsibility to prove hardship related to each variance. If the request is denied, the Applicant will have to redesign the site to minimize the variances associated with the proposed project. If the Planning Commission were to approve the site plan, preliminary plat, CUP and variances, staff recommends that the approval be subject to the following conditions and findings: Wetlands and Storm Water Management: 1. The final storm water management plan (SWPP) and wetland delineation should be submitted to ECWMC for final approval. 2. The final storm water management plan (SWPP) and wetland delineation should be submitted to the City's engineer for final approval. 3. The storm water pond located on the west portion of the site should be moved so that no portion is located within the dedicated road easements. 4. That all conditions stated in the City's Engineer report dated January 26, 2007 be addressed and resubmitted for final review with respect to the storm water calculations and the ponding area. Signage: 5. All signs shall be in compliance with the sign matrix approved by staff dated June 20, 2005. United Properties Re: Uptown Hamel Retail Development Page 14 February 8, 2007 6. All proposed signage, if lit, shall meet the outdoor lighting standards as defined in the Zoning Ordinance. 7. That if the coffee shop is to have a menu board, that the proposed sign prototype is submitted for review by the city. 8. A detailed lighting and refuse disposal plan should be submitted to show compliance with these requirements. The drive-in services must also not be used between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6 a.m. Landscaping: 9. A minimum of 20% of the plaza space should consist of pervious surfaces. This space should be updated and redesigned to be more inviting. Updated plans should be submitted for review by the city. Pedestrian Circulation: 10. The pedestrian circulation should be updated to provide better connections throughout the development. The pedestrian connections should encourage easy access to the greater trail system and should provide safe pedestrian travel throughout the development. Specifically the pedestrian relationship between the coffee shop and the credit union should be addressed. Architectural: 11. That a garbage location in the coffee shop is submitted for review by City staff. 12. That a colored lighting detail is provided for all fixtures within the development. 13. The coffee shop shall be updated to increase the four-sided architectural quality particularly of the east and west facades of the building. Additional windows and modulation should be included to help break up the massing on these sides. Updated elevations should be provided to the City for review. 14. The material labeled "siding" on the multi -tenant building should be replaced by one of the acceptable materials identified in the Uptown Hamel district. Other: 15. All conditions in the Engineer's memo dated January 26, 2007 should be addressed and resubmitted for review by the City. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Narrative received December 5, 2006 3. Engineer's Memos, dated January 26, 2007 4. Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission letter dated December 20, 2006 5. Minnesota Department of Transportation letter dated January 18, 2007 6. Preliminary Plat Graphics received January 12, 2007 7. Site Graphics received January 12, 2007 DEC ` 5 2006 Uptown Hamel Gateway Redevelopment United Properties on behalf of its client Pettibone Properties, is proposing to redevelop the SW Corner of Highway 55 and Sioux Drive in the Hamel area of Medina, MN. The project's mission is to provide retail opportunities to area residents and businesses by developing a pedestrian friendly, community integrated project. We anticipate, subject to city approval, the first building to be complete August of 2007, with the balance of the project coming on line shortly thereafter. The civil engineer for the site is Westwood Professional Services; the architect for Members First Credit Union is Tom Moorse of HTG; the owner is Pettibone Properties; and the developer is United Properties. Contact information for the development team can be found at the end of this narrative. The site plan calls for three small retail buildings, sharing common drive lanes and parking fields with pedestrian friendly areas and walkways. The total project size is expected to be 16,250 square feet. The anticipated uses are Member's First Credit Union for approximately 6,000 SF and other service retail business including a coffee shop with drive-thru. As a result of the Concept Plan review we have made the following modifications to our site plan to: 1) Increased the pedestrian connections both internally through the site and to the neighborhood. 2) Fully screened the drive-thru canopy from Highway 55 by reorienting the building on the site. 3) Dramatically improved the architecture to better connect with the Main Street area of Uptown Hamel, and to bring some architectural themes throughout the development relating to the adjacent railroad. 4) The frontage road has been designed to provide maximum flexibility for future connection and can be routed (and fully aligned on our site) to connect to the Highway 55 Rental property on the northern or southern portion of the westerly property line. 5) We have calculated the number of trips generated throughout the day and during both peak AM and PM hours to determine the capacity of the existing infrastructure to handle the additional trips generated and have provided these figures as part of this submittal. A detailed traffic study is underway (please keep in mind the total square footage being contemplated as part of this site plan is roughly equivalent to that of a freestanding Walgreens). The site is bounded by a Creek and Highway 55 to the north, Sioux Drive to the East, and wetlands and the Soo Line Railroad to the South. Resulting from the irregular shape of the site, the existing adjacent infrastructure and the creek, several variances, detailed below, are necessary to successfully redevelop the site: 1) The site falls under the Shoreland Overlay District, as it is within 300 feet of a regulated creek. As a result of the site's proximity to the creek, impervious surface is restricted to 25% of the total site area. However, the existing condition is one of compacted gravel that slopes towards the creek. We believe the redevelopment will be an improvement over the existing condition as we will construct a storm water retention pond to hold and treat the water prior to entering the creek. Additionally, the Uptown Hamel District has 90% maximum impervious cover allowed, to promote density. We would like to achieve a balance between these two objectives (approximately 61% impervious), which will require a variance to the Shoreland Overlay District. 2) Two of our proposed uses have drive-thru requirements that are an integral part of their business which require a variances as the drive ways will be within; 1) 100 feet of an improved intersecting street, 2) 300 feet of State Highway 55 and 3) 100 feet of an active railroad track. A11 portions of the site fall under at least one of the setback requirements listed above. In order to be able to attract these businesses to the site, we must be able to deliver drive- thru capabilities. During the concept plan review process, several members of planning commission and staff suggested that the drive-thru on the Credit Union be screened from the traffic on 55. We have reoriented the building on the site to fully screen the drive-thru from Highway 55 and to present the best possible elevation to this highly visible corner. There are 6 conditions which must be met in order for a variance to be granted pursuant to the Planning & Zoning Department's Zoning Variance Checklist. As a result of the site constraints we are confident that we meet all of the criteria. Additionally, we voluntarily agree to restrict drive-thru fast food operations from the development, as they do not fit in with the character of the area or of the site. We appreciate the City's willingness to contemplate these variances and our plans for development. We have earnestly tried to capture and integrate the feedback we have received from the resident's, business owner's, Planning Staff, Planning Commissioners and City Council Member's to provide a successful development everyone is proud to be a part of. United Properties is a leading commercial developer in the Twin Cities, and in 2004 was recognized as the National Developer of the Year by the National Association of Industrial and Office Parks. Contacts: Developer: United Properties 3500 American Blvd. West Bloomington, MN 55431 Eric J. Simmer 952-820-8714 esimmer@uproperties.com Owner: Pettibone Properties, LLC 126 N. Jefferson St. Suite 201 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Civil Engineer: Westwood Professional Services 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dan Parks & Ryan Edstrom 952-937-5150 Architect: HTG Architect 9300 Hennepin Town Road Minneapolis, MN 55347 Tom Moorse 952-278-8880 Client: Renee Schuyler Members First Credit Union 763-553-5393 Location Map Ferrel Gas Property 3575 Sioux Drive 0 250 500 AIL LANDFORM MINNEAPOLIS • PHOENIX nBonestroo 0 Rosene ii Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects January 26, 2007 Ms. Jennifer Haskamp Planner C/O Landform 800C Butler Square 100 North 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55403 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 Office: 651- 636- 4600 • Fax: 651- 636- 131 1 www.bonestroo.com Re: Hamel Town Center BRA File No. 000190-07000-1 Plat No. 405 Dear Jennifer, We have reviewed the revised preliminary plat and plans for the proposed retail development in the southwest quadrant of TH 55 and Sioux Drive, dated January 12, 2007. The proposal is to construct 3 commercial buildings, a parking lot, and access road. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters: Streets/Parking Lot • A geotechnical report, R-value recommendation, and pavement design should be submitted for review and approval. The report should indicate if any contaminated soils are present on the site. • Final plans should include all applicable Medina City Standard Details. • A profile should be provided for the proposed road. • B618 curb and gutter should be installed on the public road. Grading/Drainage/Wetlands • Final plans should include a detailed Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for review and approval. • Drainage and utility easements should be provided over all ponding areas, wetlands, and drainage ways. This includes the existing wetland along the north edge of the site. • The stormwater pond encroaches onto the proposed right-of-way. The entire pond must be located within the proposed drainage and utility easement. • The proposed drainage and utility easement over the stormwater pond should encompass the entire area up to the high water level. It does not appear that the east side of the pond is included in the proposed easement. • Engineered retaining wall design and details should be submitted for all retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height. • See attached comments from Dan Murphy and Lance Hoff regarding stormwater management. • The proposed improvements will disturb more than one acre. This will require a NPDES permit from the MPCA. • The applicant must address the comments and requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission in their letter dated December 20, 2006. Bonestroo recently merged with DSU, bringing together sore of the best regional talents in engineering, architecture, planning, landscape architecture, and urban design. Cur combined team now provides integrated services in one organization. • St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN ■ Milwaukee, WI ■ Chicago, IL Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned nBonestroo 0 Rosene ii Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 Office: 651- 636- 4600 • Fax: 651- 636- 131 1 www.bonestroo.com Utilities • Based on the existing sanitary sewer elevations, it appears that the proposed invert elevations of the two sanitary sewer services at the wye connections are lower than the existing pipe. These invert elevations should be raised such that the service invert is higher than the main pipe invert, as per the City Standard Detail. • All domestic water service lines and fire service lines should be directly connected to the main water line. • The proposed 8" watermain should be cut in, not wet -tapped, to the existing 8" watermain. • Utility easements should be provided over all watermain, excluding services. • A permit will be required from Mn/DOT to install the proposed storm sewer outlet in the Highway 55 right-of-way. Traffic • The plans and Traffic Analysis should be submitted to Mn/DOT for review and approval. • The southbound Sioux Drive right turn lane should provide 120 feet of storage. • The AutoTurn exhibit that was submitted indicates that the vehicle (bus) will run over the proposed curb in several locations. Traffic lanes may need to be adjusted to accommodate all vehicles. • It appears that vehicles entering the parking area to the North of the credit union will not be able to turn around to exit the area. The parking area should be configured such that all vehicles can enter and exit the parking lot in the event that all parking spaces are occupied. • Trash storage locations should be indicated on the plans. They should be located such that they are easily accessible to garbage trucks. General • The applicant should clarify existing and proposed drainage and utility easements over the north part of the site. The applicant should review this issue with the city to determine how best to approach it. • Plans should be submitted to the Fire Marshal for review and approval. • When the final plans are completed, we will prepare an estimated cost for the site improvements as a basis for the financial guarantee necessary. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (651) 604-4894. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Darren Amundsen Bonestroo recently rrerged with DSU, bringing together sore of the best regional talents in engineering, architecture, planning, landscape architecture, and urban design. Cur combined team now provides integrated services in one organization. • St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN ■ Milwaukee, WI ■ Chicago, IL Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Memo Sonestroo 0 Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers 6 Arantect s Project Name: Hamel Commercial Site To: Tom Kellogg From: Dan Murphy, Lance Hoff Re: 3rd Drainage Review, Plat # 190-405 Client: The City of Medina File No: 190-06-000-1 Date: 1-26-2007 Developer: Engineer: Submittal: Date of Plans: Date Received: Pettibone Properties Westwood Professional Services Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Drawings 12-8-06, Revised 1-12-07 1-12-07 Comments/Recommendations 1. The western retaining wall immediately adjacent to the proposed pond extends vertically approximately 11' from the parking lot to the pond bottom, 4' below the pond NWL. The City should discourage the use of retaining walls adjacent to ponds, especially those that are permanently inundated (i.e. extend below the pond NWL). Special geotechnical precautions should be made even for those retaining walls that are only intermittently inundated (i.e. extend to an elevation above the pond NWL and below the HWL). Engineered retaining wall plans for the wall adjacent to the proposed pond, signed by a registered geotechnical engineer, should be submitted to the City for review and approval if the developer's engineer deems this wall absolutely necessary. 2. The preliminary utility plans show storm sewer from STMH-21 to FES-20 aligned through the proposed retaining wall and emptying into the pond. The invert elevation of FES-20 is at an elevation of 967.23 and is below the proposed pond NWL of 967.3. This alignment is unacceptable from a maintenance standpoint. The storm sewer could possibly be rerouted north of the retaining wall or south to the pipe running west along the access road. 3. The pond NWL is listed as 967.0 on Sheet 7 but as 967.3 on the remainder of the plan sheets. This discrepancy should be resolved. 4. The proposed pond does not have dead storage equivalent to the runoff volume generated from a 2.5" event. Based on the revised plans and submitted stormwater calculations, the required dead storage is 0.34 ac-ft. The proposed pond provides 0.26 ac-ft. Increasing the pond normal depth up to a maximum of 10 feet will help to meet this requirement. It appears that the pond can be graded to an elevation of 958 while still maintaining the required 3:1 side slopes. 5. The proposed pond has sufficient flood storage to match existing runoff rates from the 2-, 10-, and 100-yr storm events. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. www.bonestroo.com ❑ St. Paul Office: 2335 West Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 Phone: 651-636-4600 Fax: 651-636-1311 ❑ Milwaukee Office: 1516 West Mequon Road Mequon, WI 53092 Phone: 262-241-4466 Fax: 262-241-4901 ❑ Rochester Office: 112 7th Street NE Rochester, MN 55906 Phone: 507-282-2100 Fax: 507-282-3100 ❑ Willmar Office: 205 5th Street SW Willmar, MN 56201 Phone: 320-214-9557 Fax: 320-214-9458 ❑ St. Cloud Office: 3721 23rd Street S St. Cloud, MN 56301 Phone: 320-251-4553 Fax: 320-251-6252 ❑ Grayslake Office: 888 East Belvidere Road Grayslake, IL 60030 Phone: 847-548-6774 Fax: 847-548-6979 METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES, INC. Loren Kohnen, Pres. (763) 479-1720 FAX (763) 479-3090 December 12, 2006 TO: Rose L. FROM: Loren K. RE: Pettibone Properties Sioux Drive Medina, Minnesota UPTOWN HAMEL RETAIL Discussion Items: 1) Are there fire hydrants on the backage road? 2) A 1-hour Fire Department sprinkler valve, room 3) Post-Indicating-Valve,(PIV) should be shown. 4) There can be no parking on the two,(2) entrances into development off of the backage road: 5) The backage road does not appear; to be'wide enough to permit any parking on it. 6) The backage road must be completedbefore occupancy of any buildings. At this time, there is only one way in and out of an emergency regarding the railroad or Sioux Drive. This is a nice proposal for this site.. The design of the buildings for the area seem to fit very well: Would there be any need for meeting=with the developer? I£ so, please let me know. LK:jk should be shown. of the case in Box 248, Loretto, Minnesota 55357 elm creek Watershed Management Commission ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 3235 Fernbrook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 PH: 763.553.1144 FAX: 763.553.9326 E-mail: judie(a�iass.biz December 20, 2006 Ms. Rose Lorsung, City Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 TECHNICAL OFFICE Hennepin County, DES 417 North 5`h Street Minneapolis, MN 55401-1397 PH: 612.596.1171 FAX: 612.348.8532 E-mail: Ali.Durgunoglu@co.hennepin.mn.us Re: Pettibone Properties — Concept Plan (ECWMC # 2006-060) Dear Ms. Lorsung: As you have requested, I am providing comments for the Pettibone Properties Preliminary Plat. The plan dated December 8, 2006, is considered incomplete. The following review and comments are not official and are provided as a courtesy. Also, please refer to my earlier comments dated October 25, 2006. According to the Hennepin County tax records, this parcel is about 3.41 acres. It is surrounded by HWY 55 on the north, Sioux Drive on the east and Soo Line Railroad on the south. Elm Creek runs along the HWY 55 right-of-way on the north and transects the northeast portion of the property before it runs under Sioux Drive. The existing business has about 35% impervious cover. A stormwater treatment pond is proposed on the west side of the property. Floodplains: Based on the recently proposed City Flood Profile for Elm Creek, the 100-year Base Flood Elevation (BFE) at the east end of the property is 966.58 feet Mean Sea Level (1929 NGVD). Similarly, the BFE at the west side of the property is about 967.14 feet. The BFE is shown on the grading plan. This plan avoids the floodplain impact by moving the proposed retaining wall at the northeast part of the property farther away from Elm Creek. Stormwater Treatment: ECWMC requires runoff rate and water quality treatment for all commercial development and redevelopment. Post -development runoff rates and nutrient loadings must be less than the existing values. Detailed stormwater treatment requirements and standards can be downloaded from the ECWMC's web page: www.elmcreekwatershed.org. The proposed pond configuration has changed from the previous submittal. The proposed inlet - outlet configuration could create a short circuit and therefore is unacceptable. The current submittal did not include a detailed stormwater management plan and therefore the ECWMC could not determine if the pond and the stormwater management plan would meet the Commission's CHAMPLIN • CORCORAN • DAYTON • HASSAN • MAPLE GROVE • MEDINA • PLYMOUTH • ROGERS Rose Lorsung Pettibone Properties (ECWMC #2006-060) Page 2/3 12/20/2006 requirements. Unless the City takes over the responsibility of the maintenance of the pond, a pond maintenance agreement, which goes with the property, must be provided. Buffers: The ECWMC requires 50-foot native vegetative buffers from Elm Creek for all new development. The revised grading and retaining wall at the northeast end of the development still encroaches within 20 feet of Elm Creek. Plans should be revised to provide 50-foot buffer. Easements must be provided to protect the buffer areas from future encroachment. One alternative to increase the buffer distance could be to eliminate four parking slots from the northeast corner, and to move the retaining wall closer to the curb. This would maintain about 40-foot buffer and would require a variance from the Commission. Wetlands: The submitted plan shows wetlands. A wetland delineation report must be conducted to field verify the wetlands on this property. The ECWMC requests copies of the delineation report and all the WCA-related notices. Site Grading and SWPPP: A complete site grading and SWPP plan must be submitted with the final plans for review. Due to the proximity to Elm Creek, all disturbed areas must be stabilized within 24 hours of grading. As I have mentioned earlier, this is an incomplete plan. To be considered a complete plan, all the necessary plan components and appropriate fees must be submitted for review. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ali Durgunoglu, PhD, PE. Technical Advisor to the Commission Cc: Judie Anderson, ECWMC James Kujawa, HCDES Jennifer Haskamp, Landform Tom Kellogg, BRA Tom Hovey, DNR CRK\PLAN REVIRM2006\Pettibone Properties\Concept Plan Comments (2006-060)_2.DOC Rose Lorsung Pettibone Properties (ECWMC #2006-060) Page 3/3 Hennepin County(C) 2006 12/20/2006 Site Location CRK\PLAN REVIEW2006\Pettibone Properties\Concept Plan Comments (2006-060)_2.DOC boo F 3 g Metropolitan District s° Waters Edge oFTRP`� 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 ONEsoTq Minnesota Department of Transportation January 18, 2007 Rose Lorsung City Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 SUBJECT: Pettibone Properties, Mn/DOT Review #P06-133 SW Quad of TH 55 and Sioux Drive (CSAH 101) Medina, Hennepin County Control Section 2722 Dear Ms. Lorsung: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following issues: Surveys: The southerly line of the area labeled HIGHWAY NO.55 that is identified as the "southerly right of way line of Hwy 55 per State and County maps" is parallel to and 115 feet from the right-of- way centerline alignment. The northerly line of the triangular exception appears to be part of the southerly TH 55 right-of-way line. The centerline and 115 foot dimension should be shown on the plat. Mn/DOT is assuming that the exception is being dedicated to Mn/DOT along with the underlying fee of the remaining area labeled as HIGHWAY NO. 55. Mn/DOT recommends that plat shows the land tie. The half section map shows the westerly lines of the area labeled SIOUX DRIVE to be carves with radii of 668' and 1406.39'. Finally, the stippled number 33 on the east side of Sioux Drive should be 241. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Rick Bmss (763-797-3113) in Mn/DOT's Survey's section. Drainage: A drainage permit will be required. The proposed construction will need to maintain existing drainage rates to Mn/DOT right-of-way. Please provide the following: I. A grading Plan of the existing & proposed project. 2. Drainage area maps for the proposed project showing both existing and proposed drainage areas and flows (with flow arrows) 3. Hydraulic computations/modeling for 2, 10, and 100 year storm events for existing and proposed condition.. Please submit any further documentation electronically as Adobe Acrobat (.pdf), and HydroCAD (.hc) files. If plans change, you must resubmit for review. The electronic model and pdf file can An equal opportunity employer be emailed to molly.chermak@dot.state.mn.us. dot.state.mn.us. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Molly Chermak (651-634-2356) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources section. Permits: Any work that impacts Mn/DOT right-of-way (including the removal of trees on Mn/DOT right- of-way) will require a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/utility . Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Review Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30-day review and response process to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any ques ions regarding this review please feel free to contact me at (651) 634-2083. Sincerel od Sherman Planning Supervisor Copy: Bob Byers / Hennepin County Planning Rob Weld / Hennepin County Surveys Pettibone Properties Westwood Professional Services Buck Craig — Mn/DOT Permits Rick Bruss — Mn/DOT Survey's Molly Chermak — Mn/DOT Water Resources Ann Braden - Metropolitan Council Copy to Mn/DOT files: Mn/DOT Division File CS 2722 Mn/DOT LGL File — Medina Bob Byers, P.E. Hennepin County Public Works 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340-5421 Rob Wied Hennepin County Surveys Section A703 Government Center 300 South 6°i Street Minneapolis, MN 55487 Pettibone Properties Care of United Properties Eric Simmer 3500 American Boulevard West, Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55431 Westwood Professional Services 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 CREDIT UNION COFFEE RETAIL TOTAL 16,250 S.F. PARKIN& REQUIREMENT I SPACE PER 200 S.F. 16,250 / 200 = 82 SPACES REQUIRED PARKIN& PROVIDED : 86 STALLS SITE PLAN HICKEY THORSTENSON GROVER www. htg-arch Itecta. com 9300 Hennepin Town Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tel: 952.278.8880 Fax: 952.278.8822 PROJECT HAMEL RETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA FOR: 1°11 UNITED PROPERTIES SITE PLAN I HEREBY CERTFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SU°ERWS10N AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAMS OF THE STATE OF F-- .1A,MES R. &ROVER II29B9 DECENEBER 8, 2006 REG. NO. DATE BID SET - REVISIONS DATE NO. tr-6.06 CITT SUBMITTAL 12•77.06 CITY RE•SUBMITTAL DRAM Br MT OEdFD V. Al A1.1 08243 9106243 5HOEBOX DECORATIVE Luminaire Location unrnry LomNo Label X Y Z Orient 1 A 4830325 191703.2 28 73.74 2 A 463120.7 191T10.2 28 183.073 3 A 463158 191664 28 79.252 4 A 463249.7 1E116572 28 126.511 5 A 463107 1916602 28 254.32 6 A 463203 191832 28 288.569 7 A 482832 191804.7 28 339.689 8 B 462921.7 1919142 28 253.045 9 B 162890.5 1918812 28 342267 10 B 463024.5 1918202 28 185.271 11 8 463007.7 191888.7 28 252.745 12 D 162991.7 191779 15 71.56E 13 0 /82935 191796.5 15 71.565 14 D 482830.7 191813 15 71.585 15 D 453059 1917952 15 74.055 18 D 483040.5 191509.2 15 72.848 17 D 463030.7 1917762 15 161.996 18 D 463137 191774 15 59.955 19 0 483191.5 191754 15 87.754 20 D 4632455 191764 15 95.492 Shoebox at 28 ft Decorative at 15 ft Statistical Area Summery Label Avg Max Min Avg/Min Mard/Ain Deecrl(Aon Mein Parking 3.05 7.9 1.0 3.05 7.90 Hods FC at bred* In main parking sma CU dramatic 2.14 4.0 0.8 - 2.68 5.00 Hods FC at grads M Credit Union drive-tw Coffe drive 8au 325 8.7 0.8 4.08 10.88 Hone FC at grade In Coffee dr6e6au Luminaire Schedule Symbol C1Y Label AmngemM Lumens LLF Natrlp9an n 7 A SINGLE 32032 0.700 McGraw Edson CAL-400•MH-3S 4CCW MH Iwo 18 IyJ`-vsSlll 4 B SINGLE 0.700 McGraw Edison CAL-4S-HS 4CON MH TypeN 9 D SINGLE 143200D 000 0.700 Ireue Epic Modem EMM-175-MN4S-FG50175W MH Type Pi SITE LIGHTING PLAN !' HIT il l '7 c, HICKEY THORSTENSON GROVER www. htg-a rmh Itiects. Corn 9300 Hennepin Town Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tel: 952.278.8880 Fax: 952.278.8822 PROJECT HAMEL RETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA FOR: UNITED PROPERTIES SITE LIGHTING PLAN 7 REMIT CERTIFY THAT IRIS PLAT. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Br ME OR UNDER 47r WEST SUPERHSIOW AND THAT I AM A DIRT LICENSED ARCMTEL7 LINDER THE LAMS Of THE STATE Of BEG. NO. DATE 4r• LP UL SE u. *Aft 5m19 m .....re.snw.sc 1� Contact Perron: Ross Fredenburg Date: Dec. 8, OB BID SET - REVISIONS DATE NO. D•606 CITY'JEP117TAL D-22-06 CITY RE•51.1EhITTAL DRAWN Rt MT. OfMED Bt TFIA A1.2 TS4BN3 6,0' 45,4' 45'-4' 6'-O- • J�221,0" L--1 f f®" F i t� �• ___, �I k=" i etARCN .-.1 - ,:- BOARD r,L, m ROOM /�t-i.1105F.::` _ . ( f" a LP ,.., o -. o T� Jy c.-'-- _ ----...-.-' -'OFFILE GREETER -� e: I n H• �{>• = MARKETING - &ON 'j r `- T20DI4 ^. L I 1 '_'I FILE ..- - -' .- i........ GE PRESIDENT '�IDEM I B ` __ ,.r.l,s'� TRANSITION WO S.F. 1305F AUTO AUTO BANG A -- CJ.SH WB� _;., - ,. , -_ -- �;d'-Y .: __,,,1 -7, rHmso 140 SF. -_- 's.-_F� 2405F. I n 6'-0' 31,4• 38,-0' 31,-4' 6, 0. �i C h FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "A" - CREDIT UNION 1/8'=I'-0" A N -_ M,gir I; 'HIT- T, HICKEY THORSTENSON GROVER www. h tp-a rc h I to cta. com 9300 Hennepin Town Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tel: 952.278.8880 Fax 952.278.8822 PROJECT HAMEL RETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA FOR: UNITED PROPERTIES FLOOR PLAN BUILDING "A" CREDIT UNION I HEREBY CERTEr THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Br ME OR UNDER Mr DIRECT SUPERWSION AND THAT I AM A DIA.T LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF -1A.FIES R. 6ROVER I12989 REG. NO. DECENEBER 8, 2006 DATE BID SET - REVISIONS DATE NO. D-606 CITY SUBMITTAL D-22-06 CTTT RE•SUBMITTAL MON BY MT OEEPID ar PM ALIA 08243 EE06244 32'-0' 4'-O. 24'-0' 4'-0' 10,0' I g FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "5" - COFFEE SHOP 1/8'=I'-O' T 4'-O' COFFEE SHOP TO SHARE TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH CREDIT UNION HICKEY THORSTENSON GROVER www.htg-strahlteetat.com 9300 Hennepin Town Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tel: 952.278.8880 Fax: 952.278.8822 PROJECT HAMEL RETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA FOR: UNITED PROPERTIES FLOOR PLAN BUILDING '8" COFFEE SHOP I HEREBY CERTIFY NMI THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF .yi.mes R.. 6ROVER r2989 REG. NO. DECEAEBER B. 2006 DATE BID SET - REVISIONS DATE NO. D.6.06 CITY SUBMITTAL u.22-06 CITT PE -SUBMITTAL DRAWN Br. MT 0€3133 BY. TF4d A2.1 B 06243 EE-06243 i y f wrn-0' 145,4' FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 11G11 - RETAIL 11—_ n,air vKL H/T- TH HICKEY THORSTENSON GROVER www. htg-archltects. COM 9300 Hennepin Town Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tel: 952.278.8880 Fax: 952278.8822 PROJECT HAMEL RETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA FOR: UNITED PROPERTIES FLOOR PLAN BUILDING "C" RETAIL I HEREBY CERTPY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AN A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF -1.9.MES R. e•ROVER t1i989 REG. NO. DECENEBER 8, 2000 DATE BID SET - REVISIONS DATE NO. D•6.06 CITY BUIDMITTAL 0-22-06 CITY RE•SUBMITTAL OWN BY MT CAECI ED BY. TAM AMC Agimmiermeigummi nijruminunimi unsiminuoingen reinnumminimei vimmmnivinusinnimm11im111u1m u 1111111111MI 11111111111111111111111111 II T1111111111111 II1112111141111111mrmnmurmmnmmmm insumilmomum, uniumnummon otomiummininum rd EIMSWIINVEY roingisimmumnromm. soliwomfammoilavanimmininiuminn n In unnatiolimincilin .t.unronnummaimiesnoi immarimemin irriummilimlnimignunininiann .4111111111111111111111112111101211111 prounimmin anisinninicinimme moeconionminimon, '1mm Lat.. \IORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "A" - CREDIT UNION /5"= I '-0' ..-3,4" ...111111131 .11 1111 11.1111.11111111h. /11.11111 1 10111 11111111 llnmmlr.. 401 111111 11111 11111111111111111111.1 1111...1j1.111111, III. -01111011 VII compaiminumicuminsi ma, .....iim Hy we so inning mom minso... T.O. CHIMNEY ...MUM 11.1 1 1 1 1,1111111111111111111 111 I .1/1/r»,,,TI 111■11111111116, EL.. 137-8" .411.1111.11111.1 1.111 11111 1.1111111111.1 11111 1 1 r..,,,V1 1 oinumm... AIIIIMEINERIPIEEMEIINVIELINIVILV.411-'1 VER.11PUIRSti.- .11.11,11, Innousimmusew- I 11- I 11111 14111111 II E-7-.7•11111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111111 111111111111011112111111111 Ila ..21111.11111211112111111111111211111111110 miiimmunimunamium I - : ASPHALT SHINGLES MIBINIMM NM MINIM M BM iii UM MUM M • milannoismitinial maim a massoia simasimoia aim in na amasoinsioa \nl...minummiauenumminannlnnlmminl n nommuniorm 111111111111101111011111011 "11111 111111111 11111111111111 111111111111111 III2111 III 1 11111 12 111111111121111111, 1121 1 111111111 11111111111 10111111111111111112111111 imungiumainrit iiM1111121111112111 11111211111211 111 111111 121111211 111111111111111111111111w. 111N111Y.111111.1.1! I I 19.10M1.110.1.11111.111111..1.11119M. IN11 11....MV11.1g109.11119.1.111-11.0.111.111Pillt. WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING "A" - GRED IT UNION r/8".r-0. --PRICK I TO. ROOF a, EL.. 13T-5 3/4' ''' TO.ROOF EL.- 12E-5'± FFE EL.= 100-0 • TO. CHIMNEY EL.= 132'-e! TONE T O. ROOF EL:12b 0 ASPHALT SHINGLES BRICK I FFE EL: 100,0" • TONE niiiimmuninummo tammeni mai a mum in asimainatimmilammanimmmo•- . ITNATfecallVPIA minuninnium iimummounot 1.111111111 1111111101111111112111111111110111111111102,- 1111111111 111110111111111011100111111 1111111111111 101 1 21111111 1121111111111111411,'" • ' • . 1 INIMMVAI - -111:fiturVs.7i17:1, infiedriti 1211101111121111111111111111111111I111111111 111111111111111211111111111211111111111 1 .111111711151111§' m•••••••00••••••••mwm•numumuso 'gamin EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING "A" - GREDIT UNION 1 Auffight, ArrifiliMni Mr.:1;142•1 ?-11.1 ,filagIOUNIINIWAtima,.. ...inaimanammaiminumnaimmank... .-0;,-. 4:4V .....isimunnapinicameiformumanomoaramma.... 'ilti.11 .7614 •. Viiinnuouwilextunmiumummimmuniummentemmilumummloomiumiii Nimistaigoi . minlimi 1:11.01%1 , 1111111211M1011111211111111111111121111211111011121111111111011111101111111111111.1111111 -...:• _. , -. 1111111.1111.1.11.1110 miii 01111.1.111.1111111.10111,01.1111.111011114111111.1111.1110111111.71.1111.101.111111110.1111111.01111,10.1114.1111.111111.1.1.1111111 . ''' ''' ' I1H11111111 ' I . ' Ilum1A.P..,11.P...rw..../ii.m..11.11....iimiamtunillitig....7.1.5m1..,..041Phari.ifinit4 • • NMENIMMIN. .,7..,:,....,.. imiiiimminiommmourammunsimmignionmu, inummirmunimrsmi'M ilicsmicommuituni iingivoinimmummineni 1. immosicsimmuma nimiiiiiiiiii ';'llililininq111 1100611:1001404? 1 1 ill i 1:11 11 " 1 ' ' . ' : 1 TATIV,.. 4111 niivzra on maw... a. 10..1.1,.; minim joiguimmormiummuniminumummonmiceminumnimigniii isinisinamemmour imiimmaimmumnicomnomes airmitintionniiiiinfismiskinuimmommin anniais:171; ,inmirsimmimounwormummelonninciiiimmniminmainus toussommumilum.. ..u.rimilinrimmumirmi inimitinninuommnammummiimi inommumminsvA iinionnum.imamoneinimmumemimmimomminiumisimalusiniuminaumminm, .1,411110111111111MIIMINEMIEMINNIEMINIffilIMAREINIIIIIIIMURIALmnionionimmimmin, . 1 nentersinnimminanannimmakinmpun i iiirs&vgammillwrivannalanzadionirnminimmn mmu.Trmruistumrmnimunmrrnmnrmnvrru'tb... , -.1"4"1"finniiminnummilounwirinitirucliuriVINEr , 10 piNjtn_141:740011111______,_„„---_-_-_-_: .....:::4:71...., _ .......railikiniivoillemi s , , _TIARY1.1V1112/11301241EllIVIIIII_Whillmi,_. _. ._. ..., _.ild". I. hifirAiNiiiiiitffivlf:' ' , , , ., , 41 j:,.-.:-5..T..,:,:jr --- - - - -- r- ;.-„,;:iiii.,.... --.7„,s,„.,,,..-,.--11.. ;newt' --_-, , '-.:------1 ---- vwsnokrnnr. , lafill Frir.r4rIrannerarlaiLle. TA. CHIMNEY EL.= 13743' STONE T.O. ROOF EL.. 12Er-II" ASPHALT SHINGLES PRICK I FFE EL.. 100'-0- * MATERIALS NORTH HEST STONE 9% 12% BRICK 3596 30% CHI) 13% 1% DOOR/ GLASS 39% 1696 STUCCO 4% 35% EAST 5011TH 1296 12% 30% 46% 1% 1396 lb% 21% 3596 6% 1111 /1111 m 1 Gil HICKEY THORSTENSON GROVER www. hto-a rch it. =Vs . co rn 9300 Hennepin Town Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tel: 952.278.8880 Fax: 952.278.8822 PROJECT HAMEL RETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA FOR: UNITED PROPERTIES EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING "A" CREDIT UNION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. AND THAT l AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF JAMES R. ,SRC,VER 8I2989 REG. NO. DECEMEBER 8, 2g BID SET - REVISIONS DATE NO. 12-S-06 CITY SUBMITTAL 12-22-06 CITY RE -SUBMITTAL DRAWN BY AAT CHECKED By TRM SOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "A" - CREDIT UNION A3.1A 06243 E-66243 /---METAL PLASHINS Tlaaa0 81 ■.■■w-Z:■■■RVia. .6lkSpd+V tge1. - TOW WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING "B" - COFFEE SHOP I ve•=r-o• EL: IIG'-3' ASPHALT SNIN6LE5 BRICK I niiiNmnumn ZELI mm2mmmnmm�mnmm�minrmnn.,.. iiri diiimiiimm�mo. annmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�nmmmmmmmmrmnmmnm.��_�, iiliunlammmmmmmmnnl. .Iiinmmmnmm�mmmmmmmnmm�mmmnmm�mimm�nlnnnmm� nm!nmmmmmnmmEmlm�L.. ..Iiinmmmnnnnnlamnnnmmmmm�mm�nlnmm�mm�mmnnmm�nlannl _____________ ___= nnnnnmmmmmuummm�nHann�. PetiliiOibi tintaiOtreda' QiitAfi i• EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING "B" - COFFEE SHOP IV:I'-o- SOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "B" - COFFEE SHOP W_Lly;va =r-o ' „ r�lur�lrl�ra�tl�nll�wrrww�l� ' .._ .iiimmnmm�mmmmmmmlHNITHAIr _ .miunlannlnnnnnnnnmmmnnlnmm!amnnlanmL.. ISSPAIWi -IJIMMISSar 10060O.BOBOO;r25- - - .,.-.at0anoana LUitittl. x11,1 U., ccaacr vbl TD. ROOF EL. L2C-B IF1. 0 EL: II64 ASPHALT SMNSLES BRICK I �STaE Fff EL • -0 NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "B" - COFFEE SHOP MATERIALS STONE ERICK GMU GLASS STUCCO NORTH 18% 63% 0% IR% 0% VEST b% 63% b% 21% 4% EAST l% 15% 13% ., 1. 2% SOUTH 2% 83% l% :\ 0% HICKEY THORSTENSON GROVER www. Mg -a rch Itscts. oo m 9300 Hennepin Town Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tel: 952.278.8880 Fax: 952.278.8822 PROJECT HAMEL RETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA FOR: UNITED PROPERTIES EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING "B" COFFEE SHOP I HEREBY CERT/FT THAT TIPS PLAN( SPEGFICAT/ON OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND TIRO I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UDDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF .4,4..4ES R. 6ROVER .ItB69 RE6. NO. DECELEBER 6, 2006 DATE BID SET - REVISIONS DATE NO. 0-6-06 CITY manna. B•22.06 CITY RE -SUBMITTAL DRAMN BY MT ofos Br TRM A3.1 B . GLASS II811Y11.. 11111111111111111. .11111I11111111111111111, nmmmnlmmmwm. i�liI1m°��°1�nll.1nH/uIIlm�/Il1°lI/1I�n1u1�l�1I�.1!� ����1,1Int��11��1110��11��11r1111111�i.I1 111111111t�11r111 01111��I1r1Ii m.. BRICK 2 I �iTUCLO If J TD. PARAPET EL: 12V-0- TD. PARAPE 09'-0' 111 1111 110 1111111111111111 11 .1111111m111111111111 . im ,1iONINNONME rNO.NI: ,mlummmmn:lmlimmn., 111211111111011121EI1111111/11IMIN NINt. .Imm�ulrmmmmmm,lAminnnnnnnmuumm.. _ --2114t_ NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "G" - RETAIL 1/8"=1'-O" TD. ROOF 11111K11'8i1,. ',eW.Ip.rd' d1111111111111111111.. IDING 1 �11111II o 1 1 Y1 .11111111111111111111111111L.,j1j11111111111�111�11!1:1/111. ,,,�1,g11111111111111111111111111111111,. i,nmmnnmmRnrp,minmi... .1111111OI I,n11111/��no1•1111111111.1.. ,1�1 /I�p1111111111111111111111111111pp11111111p111111111,. ,11�1111�11i1 I _�norrnlr,unwnunnlrrnlrmnmmminr1u11rrm....ai,mruauulnmm�unuumnmmmmlmnrrru,_ I I CM1 WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING ''GI' - RETAIL I/8"=1'-0•' ni11!�11116,. nilmmmmmnl. I nmmmmmmmmmwmmmmmmmnln. ..iilmu,rmarrnurmmnunnurnunnurmmnu.. I SIDING I ERICK 2 EL.. 131'-II ASPHALT SHINGLES SPANDREL GLASS BRICK 1 SPANDREL GLASS STONE FFE e EL.= 100-0" A55 TUCLO I II II II Rva =w%1M1W ++»uutic+.tivJVJSRMIINlM1 1 _ == __ rr,71W1S95S �r+wr-vv -_ 41r.��jp4 I i4-42:.i� <, . 4 ? <}{ - •r ; _p i1_Ab=_Iar_:.�N. iF _ - �n_�o- m-u a1 u..},v v'vnriair' wrra u A��11 .1111111.111111,. 1il , I TD. ROOF 0 EL, 13E-II' ASPHALT SHINGLES ILK I TONE .11i8n�._ ,1111111.1111111.. �11 .1111111111101.. IY1;�iuu,''1�nriuu{ a1lln:i�111II Afar,_ n1 Abb.n...-..1ii�'�@i01/I`f1111�fOtiliO I111i1f I�1 �1118111 111�11.. EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING 'IG" - RETAIL 1/8"=I'-0' 1lrt1111 I�IIIm3111�11.. ��1.dimml nnml°,. TD. PARAPETS /411/,"TIQ,/IIITII'ITIITj1�1li' EL. PARAPET, ,in-/11I1i11�llfil111 �C'�di111�/11 M.. 11iiu1ililil�iilllili111�ii111ini11iliiillniul.. 1ii1111m111n1111m111n111111mn1m1111111mu.. -,niuummru,rnlnnnmllu,rinmrmm�nm,mm... �r88� TD. PARAPET. • 1C EL.- INE-0' 'd �"MI F11 SOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING °G11 - RETAIL Ml viv's ~, Alr Emig 1iwin \i���wv vs__swr ,,r, ____ . :av avmmj wii v'CR rsaiiir T.O. ROOF 0 EL: 131'-II' ASPHALT SHINGLES ANDREL GLASS BRILK I TONE FFE EL.= 100,0" • TD. ROOF 0 EL: 13F-11' ASPHALT SHINGLES BRICK I TONE FFE EL, 100-0" MATERIALS STONE BRICK GMU DOOR/STUCCO GLASS SIDING NORTH 3% 39% 8% 30% 20% O% WEST 4% 33% 10% 20% lb% 11% EAST 4% 33% II% 19% IS% 11% SOUTH 3% 39% 13% 18% 14% 13% HICKEY THORSTENSON GROVER www. hto-architects. corn 9300 Hennepin Town Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tel: 952.278.8880 Fax: 952.278.8822 PROJECT HAMEL RETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA FOR: UNITED PROPERTIES EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING 'O" RETAIL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF y4MES R. GROvER n2989 REG. NO. DEL MEBER 8. 2006 DATE BID SET - REVISIONS DATE NO. 12-8-06 CITY SUBMITTAL 12-22-06 CITY RE -SUBMITTAL DFUON BY AAT CHECXED BY TRM A3.1C 1/8"=1'-0" 06243 EE-06243 NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING "A" - GREDIT UNION 501.KH ELEVATION 1/16'=1'-0' NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING "B" - COFFEE SHOP WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 1/I6'=I'-0' SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 11BI1 - GOFFEE SHOP 1/16'=1'-0' 4 r TENANT /-6 TO. PARAPET, EL.: II0'-0' TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT GROUND SIGN - GI TO. BASE EL: 104'-O' STONE BASE FFE EL.• 100'-0' 0 1/4'=1'-0' SITE PLAN SIGN DATA BUILDIN6 A AI - WALL 516N A2 - WALL 516N 100 5F. TOTAL 50 5.F. 50 5.F. EUILDIN6 B BI - WALL 516N 62 - WALL 516N B3 - WALL 516N 100 5F. TOTAL 33 5F. 33 5F. 33 5.F. B ILDIN6 C Cl- CI4 - WALL 516N 462 5f. TOTAL 33 5F. EACH MONIMENT 516N 61 - GROUND 516N 40 5F. TOTAL 40 5F. n, IN , 7 /-!/ TL (-7,` HICKEY THORSTENSON GROVER www. hey -arch Itacts. corn 9300 Hennepin Town Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tel: 952.278.8880 Fax: 952.278.8822 PROJECT HAMEL RETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA FOR; UNITED PROPERTIES SIGN PLAN I HEREBY CERTFY TRWT THIS PLAN. SPECIFCATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY NE OR UNDER NY DIRECT SUPERNSIOW AND THAT / AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF -166HES R. &ROVER .12989 BEG. NO. DECEMEBER B, 2006 DATE BID SET - REVISIONS DATE NO. 124-06 CITY BIIEMITTAL b.22.2a CRT RE•BIIEFIITTAL °RgMaY AAT CHECKED BM. TRY A4.1 Of2.3 Professional Services, Inc. Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Drawings or Plat, Site, Grading, Utilities, end Landscaping or lamel Town Center �iamel, Minnesota -epared for: "ettibone Properties :are of United Properties ric Summer 500 American Boulevard West, Suite 200 11oomington, Minnesota 55431 hone: 952-831-1000 epared by: WMMi00d Professional Swim. Inc. 7599 Anagram MIAs Eden Prairie. MN 55344 FNONE 952437-5150 FAX 9524374/72 TOLL FREE 1405437--5190 IYMsstwood t w t wmvoodpamrn oject number: 20061155.00 tact: Daniel M. Parks INDEX SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 1 COVER SHEET 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 TREE INVENTORY 4 PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 SITE PLAN 6 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 7 UTILITY PLAN 8 LANDSCAPE PLAN Vicinity Map (Not to Scale) NO. DATE REVISION SHEETS 1 01/12/06 CITY COMMENTS 1-8 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Drawings for Plat, Site, Grading, Utilities, and Landscaping for Hamel Town Center Hamel, Minnesota Date 12/08/06 Sheet 1 of 8 20061155CVP01.DWG s sw 709.9665 INv.916.0 r N eW e 97 07] Ws,ggg'7g-- � na1 of rBx2xoos ---- �•9)Sf _' 969. \ L 967 •-•.. •`a .99e9..--- 0 971.0 H/HAleA Y FD MAG NAIL .65 p• // N. 45', 2e xrB a, 9720 _ \ .07/11 ..9720 • �2\ 9 1i a µSal[xr \ J ;no 9 Np \ •076.7 / • 9761", 97.7 a28. •979 �• 9e,o,Ci, �z Denotes air conditioner Denotes sign Denotes building entrance Denotes catch basin Denotes communication box Denotes cast iron pipe Denotes corrugated metal pipe Denotes building column Denotes electric manhole Denotes gutter elevation Denotes guard post Denotes guy wire Denotes handicap ramp Denotes fire hydrant Denotes structure invert Denotes sanitary lift station Denotes light pole Denotes metal cover Denotes manhole Denotes overhead electric line Denotes power pole Denotes plastic pipe Denotes reinforced concrete pipe Denotes sanitary manhole Denotes sanitary sewer line Denotes sanitary manhole Denotes top of surmountable curb Denotes storm sewer Denotes top of curb elevation Denotes traffic control sign Denotes traffic light Denotes underground electric line Denotes water line Denotes water valve Denotes iron monument found RLS 16456 unless otherwise noted Denotes wetland stake \ ARMS _965 \ 910, .55 971 B2 rBx xOLIS 971. 6 R MAN INA MRCS r+� CRASS .0 e •971.6 9,9 97 971.6 To: Irwin Union Bank, FSB, Hamel Tower Center, LLC, and First American Title Insuronce Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were mode in accordance with the Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys." jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS in 2005, and includes items I, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7(o), 8, 9, 10 and II of Table A thereof. Pursuant to the Accuracy Standards as adopted by ALTA and NSPS and In effect on the date of this certification, undersigned further certifies that in my professional opinion, as a land surveyor registered in the State of Minnesota, the Relative Positional Accuracy of this survey does not exceed that which is specified therein. Dated this 4th day of December, 2006. SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. K. Barnes, .LP S. Minn. Lic. No. 16456 0727 124--9732 CONCRETE w .-SA9\ •97w WW2 Ir�1 � 97.0 •9721 c� \ o \A DIAN Ur ARCS se9., 6 2219C. 04 22r WV.BTr4 R 01,9720 9726 ses.e M/1 r.a 990. i i i I I I I C 976.1 30 0 30 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per First American Title Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance No. NCS-248613-KCTY, effective date July I, 2006) Lot 33, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Certificate of Title No. 1024822) NUE& 1.) Location and sizes of underground utilities shown hereon are approximate only and are shown based on field location of visible fixtures in combination with available data provided by various sources. Some underground utility locations are shown as marked onsite by those utility companies whose locators responded to our Gopher State One Call, ticket number 50595491. Utilities shown are dependent on the completeness and accuracy of data provided. Other underground utilities of which we are unaware may exist. Verify all utilities critical to construction or design. 2.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 for precise onsite location of utilities prior to any excavation. 3.) First American Title Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance No. NCS-248613-KCTY, effective date July I, 2006, was relied upon as to matters of record. 4.) Property is subject to terms and conditions of the Consent to Condemnation and Agreement between the City of Medina and the Metropolitan Council, doted September 18, 2003, recorded October 9, 2003 as Doc. No. 3852569, regording the City's utility and drainage easements on the land. Said easements are not specifically described. 5.) The majority of the subject property appears to lie within Zone X, (a areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and the northerly portion of the subject property appears to lie in Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AE (base flood elevations determined - 964 feet for this site) and Floodway Areas in Zone AE, (the floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the t% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights), per the National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C0167E, dated September 2, 2004. 6.) Areas: Gross = 170,409 Sq. Ft. or 3.91 Acres (includes rights -of -way of Hwy. 55 and Sioux Drive) Net = 148,234 Sq. Ft. or 3.40 Acres (excludes additional rights -of -way of Hwy. 55 and Sioux Drive) 7.) Restrictions (i.e., building setbacks. height and bulk restrictions, etc.) shown hereon are based on Information provided and are subject to interpretation. We cannot certify to a restriction on the basis of an interpretation as stated in note under "Table A" of "Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys". Please contact local goveming authorities for a determination of restrictions. Municipalities will generally issue a "Zoning Letter" outlining their zoning classification and applicable restrictions upon request. Zoning and setback information as provided by the Planning Deportment of the City of Medina: The subject property is zoned UH (Uptown Hamel). The setbacks for zone UH are: Building: Minimum Front: None, unless an easement or other similar dedication/area is needed for pedestrians, utilities, street, or similar purpose which may be shown on the Uptown Hamel Guide Plan for the area or for the block in which the property is located. Maximum Front: All principal buildings shall be located within 10 feet of the front lot line, unless the parcel has more than two acres and more than one principal building. Minimum Side: None, except where appropriate to provide pedestrian - plaza spoce link buildings, sidewalks, plazas, parking, and similar functions. Minimum Rear: Twelve feet or a lesser or greater amount to provide occess and loading for people and goods, fire access/control or to meet other ordinance requirements. 8.) Parking: No designated parking stripes located on the property. 9.) Survey coordinate basis: Hennepin County 10.) Benchmarks: BMAI.) Top of top nut of fire hydrant on the eost side of Sioux Drive at #3522. Elevation = 976.12 feet II.) Wetland stokes shown hereon are field located. We have no information as to who delineated the wetlands shown hereon. 60 SCALE IN FEET (A,1 Sheet size-2406 (pi Update & recertify `,&I Original survey Revision ITLS I12/4/2006 ) TLS III/9/2006 I I10/20/2005) 82 I Dote /Oro LgTA/AT/r/e: ALC5f4/LAAD 711LEYFOR ` HAMEL TOWN CENTER,LLC Suede Laced Surveying, LLC. ` 9Eosl Bloomington Freeway (3•Solt• Ile Bloomington, Mktnosoto 55420- 435Bu9Ya9: 952-881-2455 •FA%: 932E88/9-93R8 Dore: /2/4/2006 Project 2005-/66-1P Drawing: 2005/66LP20wg seeee.' 1 of T.118, R.23, S.12 20051661.P2.tlw9 TSS/TLS Professional Services, Inc. 70012 HiGHwA y NO. 5..5 - 70010 _ G ,TREE TO 8E,,, CREDI T UNION 6, DOQ SF__ FFE;9 75.0 4 I _ Existing Tree to be Saved Existing Tree to be Removed Grading Limit Lines Tree Inventory Tree ID Tree Type Removed/Saved Caliper In. Notes 70000 Boxelder Removed 8 70001 Cottonwood Removed 45 Multi-trunked Rsem 70002 Green/WNte Ash .d17 Multi -bunked , 70003 Green/White Ash Saved 70004 GreenNVhite Ash 70005 -trunked Saved 8 i GreenNVhite Ash Saved 16 Mult 70006 Green/White Ash 23 - MuttiOunked 70007 Black Willow Removed 66 Multi -bunked 70008 Cottonwood Removed 10 American Elm ,.ed8 Diseased/Damaged 70010 GreenNVNte Ash -. Saved 8 -Saved 70011 Green/White Ash awdoed 11 Re 70012 Black Willow 20 70013 Black Willow emomd 28 Multi4runked Rssaa‘ 70014 Green/White Ash 11 Removed 58 70015 Black Willow Mutti-franked Saved Saved , 70016 Black Willow 11 70017 Cottonwood 28 Removed 70018 Green/White Ash RReem°,.evedd 12 Removed 79019 Balsam Poplar 8 70029 Cottonwood Removed 20 Mutti-trunked 1 Cottonwood Remcned 25 Multi4runked - 70022 Cottonwood Removed 33 Multi4runked 70023 Cottonwood 22 Removed 70024 Cottonwood Removed 9 ' 70025 Cottonwood 22 Multi-hunked Removed 7'0026 Cottonwood 30 70027 Cottonwood 9 Remised 70028 Eastem Red Cedar Removed 10 Multi -bunked Sifted 70029 American Elm 20 70030 Eastem Red Cedar Removed 7 Removed 70031 rn EasteRed Cedar rn°wd 8 Multi -franked 70032 Eastern Red Cedar w.d8 MMulutttik4runkrunked Removed Removed ed RReemmo 70033 Eastem Red Cedar 10 70034 Eastem Red Cedar 8 Multi -franked Removed 70035 Eastem Red Cedar 9 70036 Eastern Red Cedar Removed 12 Multi-trunked 70037 Eastem Red Cedar 6 70038 ' Eastem Red Cedar 7 70039 Balsam Poplar 8 70040 - American Elm RRRRRRReemernotedeimedernoemmdelmedmo:wd,m,ed„ 12 70041 Cottonwood 82 DiseasedMulti-tirunDakmedaged 70042 ' Boxelder 8 Rammed 70043 American Elm 8 70044 American Elm 9 Diseased/Damaged 70045 American Elm Removed 11 70046 Black Willow Saved 22 Multi-trunked 70047 Black Willow Saved 9 Saved 70048 Black Willow 18 Multi -tanked 70049 American Elm 70050 Boxelder Removed 14 Removed 9 emo 70051 American Elm 15 70052 American Elm RRern°wd 20 70053 emo,.ed American Elm 17 Diseased/Damaged 70054 Green/White Ash 8 Removed Remo 70055 - Eastem Red Cedar Removed 6 Removed 70056 American Elm 9 70057 Green/White Ash 12 Removed 70058 American Elm 8 70059 American Elm 9 70060 ' Eastern Red Cedar 4 Removed Total Caliper Inches on Site Total Caliper Inches on Site to be Removed 998 785 Coll 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 0' 60' 90' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Waimea Plehmlerel Swim, Inc A.11... Oda Wm raid% VIM SSW MOM 10514q4150 MX 1624•74122 1011 140114041511 mwavoreposecipmen 11 Way emit, do el• plm ••• •••pm• lt, m •• mi. w ter mil 11•1 I an • .11••••••1 L401010117 vain. ohs op a Mimi Medd Mom lased Rod= br/64 Prepared for: Pettibone Properties Hamel Town Center Data 12/08/06 Sheet 3 or 8 20061155TPP0I.D Tree Inventory Hamel, Minnesota Professional Services, Inc. a 7110Perrse Orb* fain IVY% MI Sall ROE 110,07-110 N1% aQ410A@ 101r ells 14I141/7310 wer awmeed.a. r. / // lei//;444 i Nn, A,^ May Nay v l..r, 5, Edge or Bituminous (I '- / ,� _ 6J26 _ . I, i r - / - l _s ` ' 1 N.- /)' / __ / �_ -/ e4 �!4 - �t_O� 1 1 1- I 11 --- it I - -�r4 1 l i I r ��. i ... ..........._ `' i Y l 1_ _ 1 / 2 / v? ta: 4- / 20, SJ DI sq.lt. / /i�`` s�Tszss rRn �0 i / _7- 1 ?-Drainage ! UMity - it l / Easement i 1 I f 1 % ( / / C-1 j l I I--�� a / i u a� / / 2yyrB^—_l `` i Iyr aiMs er W rYww rTIy r at soft w dint =pedalo red W l • tial, Noma IA10 aRVO011 adw in Le se W IYw • Iel.ewe. 1.6rkLe� 6vfva7 Lama Ns 43933 INTWITes 01/11/07 - att COMMIT i Crews RaWa bawd De wi= briers Prepared for: Famdylug Nd Pettibone Properties Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 Property Description: Lot 33 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Certificate of Title No. 1024822) Development Data TOTAL 577E Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION Highway No. 55 Sioux Drive Roadway ROW .�- ZONING Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Building Setbacks: See Site Plan Parking Setbacks: See Site Plan General Note 3.91 oc. 0.97 ac. 0.47 ac. 1.08 oc. 0.43 ac. 0.10 ac. 0.86 ac. Uptown Hamel District Uptown Hamel District Lot dimensions are rounded to the nearest one hundreth of a foot and areas are rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Drainage and Utility Easements will be provided as required, typically easements will include 10 feet adjacent to public right of ways and ponding areas. Topography and boundary survey information by others. Legend • NETLAND Da GATE VALVE SIGN-TRAFFlC/OTHER O HYDRANT z-- SIGN-IRAFF7C/OTHER 4j( WATER METER ® MONITORING NELL e WATER MANHOLE El CABLE TV BOX pw NELL @I GAS METER —mv— CABLE TV 3c STREET LITE —ms— GAS LINE ^ GUY NTRE —Mn— POSTER OVERHEAD A' POSTER POLE —sus— PONER UNDERGROUND Q ELECTRIC BOX —am— SANITARY SENER • ELECTRIC METER —sm— STORM SEMER • ELECTRIC MANHOLE —Tan— TELEPHONE OVERHEAD © SANITARY MANHOLE —ma— - TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ® CATCH BASIN —NAT— WATERMAIN 4 FLARED END SECOON FENCE LINE ® STORM MANHOLE ZJ.AJ.r DECIDUOUS TREE LINE OT TELEPHONE BOX CURB A• CUTTER ® TELEPHONE MANHOLE Hamel Town Center Hamel, Minnesota 0' 30' 60' 90' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Dr= 12/08/06 shot 4 or 8 20061155PPF01.D Preliminary Plat 'rofeeeional Services, Inc. Coll 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 I I L o' 30' 60' 90' soo 4 /4/ Np J \ 414 \ '9 ° 4 S,S LOT 1 CREDIT UNION h 6, 000 SF FFE- 75. 0 EDGE OF WETLAND \ (nP.) D \ L'I.1 General Site Notes A. ALTA/ACSM SURVEY FOR THIS PROJECT BY SUNDE LAND SUREYING. DATED 12/04/06 B. SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE NOTED, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. C. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS D. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT GOPHER STATE "ONE CALL' FOR UTIUTY LOCATIONS AT 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION ON SITE. E. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. F. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. G. ALL CURB RADII ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3.7 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. H. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 1. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. J. SITE UGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO UGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE UGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. K. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE LOCATION OF "NO PARKING, FIRE LANE" SIGNS WITH THE FIRE MARSHALL L PARKING LOT STRIPING TO BE 4" WIDE COLOR WHITE, TWO COATS OF PAINT. M. ALL CURB B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED Site Legend 0 INDICATES RUINER OF PARKING STALLS PANT STRIPING SHALL CONFORM TO MAOT STANDARDS TC� TRANSFORMER G HD 91E LIGHTING CONCRETE HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Site Details 1.5 VALLEY GUTTER 6 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 10.1 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 10.2 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP OPTION 11 TRAFFIC FLOW ARROWS 12 ACCESSIBLE PARKING LOGO, STRIPING, k SIGNAGE 13 CROSSWALK STRIPING 14 "STOP" SIGN AND PAINTED STOP BAR Signs (Refer to MnDOT Details) am S.1 "STOP" SIGN — R1-1 O PUBLIC R/W, 24.5(24' PRIVATE S.2 "STOP FOR PEDESTRIANS IN CROSSWALK" — R1—X1 S.3 'DO NOT ENTER" — R5-1E 5.4 "BEGIN ONE WAY' — R6—X1 S.8 "RIGHT TURN LANE SIGN' — R3—X1 S.9 REGULATORY SIGN R3-30AA S.10 TYPE 3 BARRICADE Site Notes C) 4' TRAFFIC WHITE LANE STRIPE (TYP.) 4' DOUBLE YELLOW LANE STRIPE (TYP.) 4' YELLOW 45° STRIPING — 24" O.C. MATCH EXISTING CURB 8 GUTTER MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT RETAINING WALL PLANTED AREA PROJECT PYLON OR MCNUMENT SIGN SIDEWALK AND JOINTING (REFER ARCH. PLANS) PROPOSED GROUND COVER SUMMARY EXISTING PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 55,942 S.F. 91,114 S.F. PERVIOUS SURFACE 95,932 S.F. 60,760 S.F. TOTAL 151,874 S.F. 151,874 S.F. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VANNmed Nelmierai Simla*Ir. MO AMP. Me Sea neb4 MAN SLIM NO. MMK TOLL Ili 11624074119/ 1041174111129 14Mi23ta i N UM, my eM er 1V in•^rA N Er or mew as. =webby r ■e [ r • w bNoA 1e0l711=0IAL Mai lby•■r Mr MA leer KnbMs 01/12/01 - OTY COMMITS (MY) Doll & m OILY P1epeled for Pettibone Properties Hamel Town Center Ease 12/08/06 Shaw 5 OF B 20061155SPP01.DWG Civil Site Plan Maki IL Patio 01/12/07 MsM N. 18919 >a� IMO Derlr bedew AkLI Hamel, Minnesota Professional Services, Inc. Grading Notes SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDEF BY SUNDE SURVEYING. SURVEY DATED 12/04/06 A. Contractor. shall refer to architectural plane for exact locations and dimensions of vestibule, doped pavement exit porches n en" truck daub, precise building dknenelons moot bulking utNty entrance laaalbns, and woof Imagoes and number of dowleparta B. All disturbed unpaved areas are to read. four Inchm of tapeol and mod Thess arras Mali be watered unti o healthy stand of grass is obtained. C. The antructa deal tab di precaution necessary to avoid property donate to adlocent propane during the construction phases of thin project The aontrootor wN be hid eddy responelbls for any damaged to the mpeant propertlr accuninq during the construction phases of tines project D. The contractor shall be rssporobe for awning and mahtdnhg trofnc control else me such es barricades, warning situ Aectimd Mrs lagnen and lights to control the movement of traffic when nscessoy. Placement of them dodoes shallbe approved by the engineer peke to placement Traffic 'antral devices Mat conform to appropriate 14NDOT standards E. Safety notice to contractors. In accordance with generally accepted contraction practices, the contracts col be whey and completely responsible for cadtkos m the job site, continuously fm0 of psrsms and properly during performmce of the wait thin requirement wN be =feted to normal working hours The duty of the engineer a the developer apply omOuct construction rovYw of the mntraetds performance Is rat Intended to Include revlrw of the adequacy of tot construction silo F. The ate work for this project Mal moot a mooed the de elopa's standard ate work specifications. G. The confronter Mdi complete the alto grading h accordance with the nod...month of the comers Motahnrd engineer. AN col testing shall be completed by the owners geoteolnkal engineer. The contractor Nit be responsible fa'padhaling al required soli Wets and Inspection with tot geotednnkd engineer. The etas of rrtMing On cuss of tests not meeting doodads) shall be ban by the contractor. H. NI slopes are to be graded to 11 or flatter. unless otherWes Indicated on this sheet I. Bulking grading hold down r 5 Inch. (Confirm with building plans). See was report for pavement thicknesses and hold GOWrrs J. Spot elevations Morn hdkate frilled pavement devotions r gutter flow pot unless °t ono. noted K. Proposed centaur are to Meshed surface pads L Prior to placement of any structure a pavement a proohol ell be reeled on the eubgrads ProohoNhg Mal M a. r nplrhed by making minimum of 2 complete passes with fully -loaded tandem-arol dump truck, or approved equal, in each of 2 perpsnacuke direction while under super Aston and Moak. of the Independent testing labarotary. Area• of fakirs dip be mcevated and reeanpacted a specified herein. Y. FInWad grodkp Mat be mrrhpMled The contractor atrial unHmNy grads ores wNnh Notts of going, including adjacent Iran areas Provide a smooth Milted surface within specified tolerances, Wth uniform Med ar slopes between points, when elevations are shown, or between such points, and Meth qq grades Arem thot have been WM graded doll be protected from subsequent construction �elOt s N. 11 exam soil material date after the elte grading le completed the protracW Mal clams of di excess soil material In a manna acceptable to the aster and the regulathg agencies involved O. See landscape plan fa plmthge r turf establishment. P. Find retaining ea design to be prepared by a Reopened Structured Engineer. O. AN construction shall conform to local, Sloth and Federal Rules including the Nader! Palotanl Dtechargs Elimination System (WKS) permll requirements R. Embankment menial doped beneath the building shall be paced and convected In accordance with the requirements of the geoteoMkbd engbwer. S. Embanlonent material paced beneath arrest or creed shall be compacted In accordance with the specified density 'naiad es outlined In Ie100T 2105. and the readrenwnts of The geotechnkd engineer. T. Embankment mental not placed in the bolding pad, streets or parking ores, Mall be compacted In 0000rdence with requirements of the ordinary conveotlen method es outlined In SHOOT 2105.32 U. NI soils and materials testing Mal be rntpnnpplsted by on independent geotednhd engineer. Excavatlon fa the purpose of removing unstable a wadable ache deal to completed as rented by U. gwtechnical engineer. The contractor oral be responsible for coordhothg all revoked eohe tests d Yapeetbn• with the geotechnicd engineer. Erosion Control Notes A. Sit fence shall be instated sand site In at m area and locations where storm water runoff may leen the dte, prior to my emovatlon/canmtructian activities B. A rack construction entrance Mall be headed at di caatruatbn entrances. C. Siltation and salon control: The contl0'lor Mall assume complete reeesppmsDNly for controlling at diction and erosion of the project area The contractor ehdl use wholever means neae•ary to control the erdon and diction hcluang but not limited catch bash Inserts, rock corrtructlon entrances erosion control Monte, and vet fences Control Mal commence with graMg and continue throughout the project and acceptance of the wort. by TM owner. The contractor. responeEmy Includes all knpiemmtation as required to prevent erosion and the dsposlUon of at. The owner rnoy erect the omtroctor s methods as deemed fit to protect property and Improvements My deposition of vet or mud on new or existing pavement or In mMhg ram sewers or were Mall be removed eta each rah. Affected areas Mall be denied to the satiefocUon of the owner, al wi the ovens of the contractor. NI temporary oradan contra eidl be removed by the contracta alter the turf Is e dabbled D. Contractor shall Instal temporary inlet protaetlon (1tplCo or equivalent) wound all catch trash grate hints, affected by thin contraction. E All unpaved areas altered due to ramtratko activities met be metered with seed and mulchv sod, *make control blanket or be had surface within 24 hours of amprtbn of canstructim F. For arrears with elope of act or greater, restoration with sod or erosion comfort blanket is reyhod. G. Pudic: streets used for hauling Mal be kept free of eat and debris. Street weeping Mall be competed daly. Legend 980 91.00 z R E.O.F. 58 00 TV/ = 52.00 BW = 52.00 DENOTES SILT FENCE DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION AT GUTTER LINE. (PM.) (ADD 900' TO SPOT ELEVATIONS) DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DENOTES TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL DENOTES FLOW DIRECTION 0--Ra--0 DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER Fe►� DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES PROPOSED WATER MAIN e ve DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER HAT DENOTES ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DENOTES EROSION CONTROL BLANKET Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twtn City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Tall Free 1-800-252-1166 CORA STMO N FLTER FARM TIP[ s -ADD 1116 III 1110010 TTPE . - AOD 1111E III AND NAY OMER 3T03.a WOCO PCBT NUL OR Of HMI MAX WOO PosT tin 10d vex. SPA0110 elm KE IRPOIT PENCE B-0' MAX SPACNO NOWT eRE SPPCNT FMK FILTER FABAr ATTACH SCNa.Y TO UPSTREAM SEE OF POST. RUNOFF ♦ A' R0N0H 111114 COFACIED BAO711 mattiNPINFamir NIOTC tY 1. RESPECT MO R&M MICE AFTER EACH F ON E1OR AID 10101E SEVRNI waR 1@4ART. 2 161101E0 SEE ENT MA. BE DEPOSITED W AN AREA THAT r. MDT = K K 511401T OFF-316 MD aW K TIONAENTLY STAKI3A A OFT FINK OM. K PIA® CN COPE 0OTD111K TO MAKIM POOK EFTWE NCY. r NORM Rang COIISI1116/1 N CRRMeZ SNPAD K A WEN MOOR Cr 1.0 AID CORM MM •111 SpE OMER OF /t1. s' Mir. RECCONOKED STOOK ICOR CRAM. /ILT MCI AISC ktti AL 9Estm LOIaIRIICTIOM , sIN 1690. AIRS 990.CT RAL MONO OX6 - 01.1-e1. L C R tug - 2110sAMETv AID 1FALTN STA OBBCO o®u Ibes MIDWAHE NOE wouR LOAD WITf FACI01 eMRS FLOW RATE (1N OLON POLIES -ER SLEEK) 60316111 MEWL w RATE n/a e/a MK er•Y bd 214w a 16"Md SKEET COTRACTOR TO NSTM. KEEN as0 • arTOER O dOTANID. MNNTM IAA SITE e STAB. ROAD ORAN C4-v NI Ncd OAK NET PROTECTION 0' 30' 60' 90' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION warmed MATIONSI Smirm lf/ Ares me Dnlr Eon Pr.* aloe Its{{ MOM /624974150 MX 9246A1422 10I2 NIi 1411M//7a160 wwxnrbroodpmen 1 kin, NMI) not ee per me Pland 1m a or male 4 Ire! mpuBi s Ad am 1 m • NM Omni Eaes1111111NAL OI®S NAM as Ise d 1M Err d NAeesr '.-�� heirs I Dsiera o/1a/or CD - mews (AMC) �� CONS Prepared for. Pettibone Properties Hamel Town Center Das 12/08/06 Shot 6 OF 8 20061155GDP01.0 Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Drill a. Alb 0102/06 Limns Ns 111919 Hamel, Minnesota Professional Services, Inc. /V Q weer \any \tea .44 O.C.S. (SEE- OETIAL) POND NWL-967.0 HWL=970.0 4Hr HYD. W/ 8" G.V. STMH-21 FES-1 W/ RIP WET TAP TO W/ fl" G.V. 8"X 8" REDUCER 6"X 8" TEE 6" W.M. 6" PLUG CBMH-3 ADJUST RIM TO 971.5 E=964.5 2" TYPE K CAPPER DOMESTIC W/ 2" C. STMH-10 cealnm Di.. Typo Dakb To 0trucnn No. Slope x Pipe Dletkel Pip* Length Pipe Nobdol ltrn Eft vaaon DP Stmt. Invert Els v. Up Shots. I Dn..helwe Pipe kevem Inlnn of mob.* Fern I ke1a, pre. 1a i F.,,.. x9 ,, I�M' err Inv Dir 27. 4r 4r 30174 R255M 34674 7 0.20 0.20 ate 1169 11N 1E00 N 42 n RCP RCP RCP 07110 17131 97/10 910.40 N.a 900.40 NLtl /rN Ira 9 169.40 M.N 069.46 SW 0W w 919.41 ae.4a NE Nli I - I - f 1 1 1.10 I 1100 I a I RCP I 07100 I 970.e0 I 170.11 I r I m.N I s I I I I I ✓ 4r 9047-V N17-y 4 0.25 0.95 12.00 12.00 a 71 RCP RCP 17130 r71n 969.32 000.24 0N.24 N1.97 e N EE SW W N9.a 019.24 1E NE 179.11 x 2x9 r 1M-V 11174 n 14 0.10 0.36 1E00 11.16 195 sr RCP RCP 17E10 97150 mN N.N 9N.N era 12 11 970.00 N9.01 MAO N ✓ Nfr-V 10 10 1.01) 1.00 11/0 1100 21 95 RCP RCP 17540 17150 97.50 s7.n 170.29 961114 11A n 97.50 m.N SE 070.21 I2x1I 91174 4 11.00 I 1100 1 a I RCP 1 07122 1 m.a 1 170.04 1 4A I eta I x 1 4r R4711 4 0.90 12.00 199 RCP 97112 900.43 96113 19 101.43 NW NE 969.04 NW 40' 9017-V 0.11 15.00 RCP 17.12 141.77 16E71 4 101.77 w SNOT F M.11 170.04 NW 3 1 1.60 I 1100 I 7 1 RCP I 971M I 070.50 ( 170.43 I 1A 1170.50 I 9 f 110' ( 34e74 I t 10.N I use I_ 107 I RCP I 17445 I 1411.51 1 N7.55 I / 1 10451 I W 1019.71 I E 1 970.49 I N ( 2z9 1 9047-V .1 2 I t.00 I an I to I RCP moo I w.st Z 970.21 2A 1 970.51 1 N I r 151074 I 1 1 0.25 I 21.00 I N I RCP I stun I 967.95 I 907.22 I 2 I N7.95 1 N I 017.55 1 E I 970.21 I s I 2x9 r r 30A-V 34474 90074 a r 20 9Aa 0.45 e.40 15.00 15.00 15.N N RCP RCP RCP 971.21 171.20 17450 0117.70 NEN te7.a Nast 917.13 167.20 29 22 n 107.70 N EN 147.29 W KEN WET TAP TO W/ 8" G.V. 8"X 6" REDU 6"X 6" TEE CBMH-5 E1 w RE"sa1 E"N7e 8"X 6" REDUCER 6"X 6" TEE TYPE K COP ESTIC W/ 2" C.S. w.M. wG CREDIT 6N UNION 6, 000 SF FFE= 9 75.0 W/ 8` CLEAN VERIFY INVER FIELD /-. 6• win. IEw963.6 EDGE OF WETLAND (TYP.) CBMH-8 RETAINING WALL (TYP-) i-4172 667 war General Utility Notes Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 A TM contractor A epeolflodly cautioned that IM location and/or elevation of existing utNtd a. Mown on these plan N based an records of the various utility Dampen& and limited meaamenente taken n the Nerd. The Infrrnotket lose not be relied on as being exact or complete. The contractor shall lolly foisting conditions prior to construction and notify the owner or m n= of decrepand .. B. The contractor mud cal the appropriate utility company � responsibility nWet 46 hours Delon my excavation to requeut� Imam of utilities. It dldl be the reponal�y of the the contractor to relocate di adding proposed improvements plane. The location of Nettles dial be obtain by the contractor by calling Gopher States One Coll at 1-500-252-1166. C. Prlar to constuctin, the contractor Thal obtain the neusery faded. state and lard pants far Me proposed work or verify with the owner or engineer that permits have been obtained Permit fees shoe bo en responsibility of the contractor union otherwise arranged with the owner. D. Cantrodce shot refer to rohKedurd plans for exact locatkn and d mensbne of doorway., rasps. truck dodo, prod. balding denmelone and exact budding utility connection locations. E. AD electric, Wegngn and goo erotmebns coed other tanks lines shall be constructed In accordance with the spedlkatlom of the appropriate °ditty comment The contractor Mali coordinate the sores* Ire camtructlon with the utlity onmpanMs. F. All solitary sever, storm ewer and water main istallotlons shall be In accordance with the clt/s nquremente and the current budding and plumbing code requirements except es modified herein: 1. Water lna and sanitary sneer make Mal . inspected and oppress] by the dty. The city Mal be notified prsr to eomneherp with the utility construction. 2. Contractor Mall not operate, Interfere with, connect any pips or hoe. to, or tap my water mdn rho:Zz to the city online duly authorized to do se by the city. My ocheres conwquahcee of or unsehedded demotion. of service to the public are to be the Ilablity of the contract«. 3. Rioter mar lengths a Mown on approximate hortrantal lengths. Mow for addtlanal pipe Men retailing on dopes or when Mlectsns ore required. The pint detections Maw not exceed the maximum recommended by the pipe manufacturer or by local gowning specifications. Fittings reseed to construct water mar Mall be Included in water main construction. 4. All water mar Mal be poly rapped es required by dty Nondarde. 5. Provide water man thrust restraints per city =rode d requlerment. 6. A minimum wtkd avocation of 16 nines le required at al water main cyaMge with eankary carer or *term sew. 7. Sanitary ewer plus and cps Mo be securely retailed of the and of arvice lines to alw for premiere tabu of mnitary seer mart. 6 Minty savior balcony terminate 5' maids beading wail odes. othrwbe Mown or noted 9. Embankment material placed beneath the budding Man be placed and compacted rn accordance with the requirements of ths gsetechnkA engineer. 10. Embankment material plooed beneath street or poking moos Mal be compacted In accordance Nth the moottled density method a outlined In NNOOT 2105.3ft and the requirements of the gcotaclnlyd engineer. 11. Embankment material not placed in the bolding paq streets or parkku case, Mall be cocompacted 3w accordance with requlrenhrts of the ordinary in y compaction method outlined DOT 210512. 12. Dlenfectian and =mum lasing of water mar Mall he performed In accardanw with the plumbing code requirements and paid for by the oontradar untie eprNdon of o nprrentaths of the city water dperlment Controto Mall notify tin city o minimum of 24 hmn prior to any Meting. The completed water more Mal be &infected for 24 hours with 50 pen mulches chlorine. At the end of the disinfection period, the resWgl Mal be at least 10 ppm withr the water mar. Water main to be pressur0 tested at 200 pit for 2 hours or the rpurements of the city. G. All materials Moe be as moaned In city requirements and balding plumbing code except r modified hoer: 1. MI materials Mdl amply with the requlremente of the city. 2. All water lines to be Ductile Iron, Clam 52 with 7.5' minimum cow unless noted otherwM. Provide minimum eapaatsn of 16' from sanitary sew 6 stem sewer. Insulate inner mar H lea than 7.5' of cow. 3. Insulation Mal be Dow Styrofoam HI Brand 35 or equivalent, with 4 Inner of thtdmese 4. All sanitary sewer pipe to be =ydn)1 chloride (MC) SDR 35 or 26 mien noted attend. SDR 26 le rooked for depths greater Man 15 test MUM 5 feet of balding and under footings, pipe Mall be pm schedule 40. 5. Stem sew pee Moll be rerfrced concrete pr0 don 5 union otherwise noted) with R-4 gaskets, or HOPE storm sew pre If allowed by the city. HDPE storm pipe Mall nisei requirements of AASHTO m204, type S with h ertlMt eannrtlone See plan fin locations .hero RCP Is required. PVC storm sewer pipe Moll be ifs 40 pipe. Flared end motions Mall be RCP with haM guards k rr-rap. 6. Peel Indicator wive. to be Clow f-5750 (r equhdent) meeting AWWA standard c500 and city donde,. Vane to be mechanical aunt reslkm wedge gote ulna Pest to be adpdahes for 6 test water mar depth. The electrical damn switch shall be part no. pcvs2 (r squhdenl). H. The cmtradr Mal be responsible for provi0ng and maintaining troMe eantrd devices such a barricade.. waning signs, directional signs, Naggers and lights to control the mownent of traffic whets ne controlyPlacement of devices shall se &don teMal in city an be approved by the awl prior to placement Tappropriate 18100T dander& I. NI sole and mmtertde hating dal be completed by on Independent geotedinlml eglner Execution for the purpose of =nosing unstable or unsuitable sob Mall be =meted on ngWrsd bythe yyrte:Mkd engineer.The o eractor. Mresponse:4 be re ponse for coordinating at required cols tests and knpotbrs with Be ge.teT J. Alter oenstruollon b completed, Me contractor Mdl pmide the owner with on as -belt mod of utility cc slructian. The orbult shall include location end length deviations or dynes* to the plat. Contractor to veiny with owner or engineer whether a pion with pat-mnslrualsn devotion. to nquFetl. K. The contractor shot obtain necessary city permits from the city Engineering Division for the connection to the city water roar. eanitary eewer, and slam sew. Permits must be obtained a (=Mum of 46 hours heirs commencing work Legend MEM SANITARY SEWER vo-(6) WATER MAIN STORM SEWER --wm-g 0' 30. 60' BMBZER SANITARY SEWER WATER HYD. W/VALVE STORM SEWER -« 90' -1- I-tee} NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Deck 12/08/06 Shoot 7 OF 8 1NNned Prober= Seel& nc Ideas• wi iiklA es I nN MOM FAX 50 :� 1 ray *alb Ns tie yin m mood Iy a e wOw 1/4 MINN.ire l www•s i d ail 1 es e Win rwi NOP�UL MMUS ones tie Yw er in sr of l4wrr Mudd l.hrks 01/12/07 - 18919 Prepared for. Pettibone Properties Hamel Town Center 20061155UTPOI.DRC Preliminary Utility Plan IProfeeeional Serdcee. Inc. Plant Schedule CODE Orr COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME OVERSIORT 1e wHAIMATyd 12 EIHROEIN O SNOWS 92 SIZE SPACING O.C. ele> Iem4 / the. ..pwtarhm Northwood Mo. / Ave earun Nertnaed' fapdE Ash / irsYnw nepa Ywged W ows Aes / Frabts p.nnsdviaa bar Prbls EM. Ash / irebtw s rw halka SW. Han•Ho n aFe1W almmaw IIwN'sow: Harman Pin oak Ourcus dlphidah s.amp rote ash / Qtr.. meow O ur Ore / thew moveso. 2.. So Le DO 26: W za err zs" De LT eD ON Le zs' DD 2Y M AS SHOW AS SHOW AS SHOW AS SNOW AS SHOW AS SHOW AS SHOW AS SNOW AS SHOW M.r sea / MLb We Thorwm COkwA. Hawthorn / paths. woo. 'Wane Awn. Trr bloc / Whoa MHO. NNW. Sadcparr / Mann. iaM. eHT.. ON CLUMP IA• es 6' HT.. DD CLOP 6' MT.. 00 CVAP AS SHOW AS SNOW AS SHOW AS DOM Prof.. Curb / gala ...on Wag low Crab / Wk. Ipho sow' Mal War. Crn /gas SP.O. A ea IS' AS SHOWN AS SHOW AS SHOWN Waal Ill. Saw / Plow W. W.. Colorado Cron Wu. / Paves Paw. WNW Pith / Pas ris. Noon. Pew Pets *ow Y HT.. BB le HT., ee 6' HT., err 6'HT..M AS SHOW AS SHOW AS SHOW AS SOW rA)) Arbor* / Ths.. am4na T.,' 4' ee OM D.oreed / Demos racwlm ore• HT.. POT Como Doom. / Cam. or.. 'Coals! J6• HT.. POT NwdWny Vlbanth Vaunts. Wake 36• HT, POT Paws. Vbram. Viburnum ...um J6• HT., POT Saes Chelan" Armin mdulawpa ]6• HT., POT gin WV WW1 / AmMts diw.Y 'Morin' 24• VW. POT W m pins / pia Ingo panda ze Sam., POT Taman yes / Tagus wail Taman. 24• VW. POT Sabath Sumac / Ma dams 36• HT, POT a. -Lan Sows / thus c omntoa'po-kai I. HT., POT Cwpmt Amok. Crwbrrpun Va.. / Wumm Mob. 'Carywte I{• HT., POT Orma.M Hydra.. / RN.. anone . thmak/Ia' be MT., POT Wor whhtl thoth us / the was W. •Conpachre I{• MT., POT Who Crown / Rid. clown• be HT, POT MdN. Cot... / C..* Nam. ge HT, POT Owl than HarwpuN. / Dlaala Wawa 24• HT., POT Rna* . Spec 9pm Jr ova.. 'n.m4whw' 24• HT.. POT Seamound SOh.a Spew Wparica'Wwnc ni ia' HT., roi Anthony wawa SpYra / Straw • butpda 'What/ WNW 24• HT., POT LAM Miners Spew / Spkan Jew. lath Prim. le• HT.. POT My Ladd Soho / S bah Yes tort' le• HT., POT Rblow Parks Ron / Ron 11M4ep Paid NO. CONT. Care. Dec. Raw / Rosa 'MhlRetd' N0. CWT. Cheep. Rees / Ram •Ch shin NO. CONT. Cholas Abend Mat / Rem Ct.. N6ne NO. CWT. Rap Dad12 / Romero.. thi lo. NO. CONT. lh WNW Dedhy/ Hw.opab 1w Carob!' NO. CONT. Wadry Pardon pMrnar.oah'Pardo. I. N0. COW Jam Sow Daps / Memreea4'Jew Sol✓ NO. CONT. SION d. era Da1Mr / Hrnreab'Mao M Ora' NO. CONT. Rqd Sbdare IN. / Mason Asp Standard' NO. CONT. 4'-0. PG O-o• O.G Y-o• 0.0 a• 0.4 {'-o• 0.G a• 0.G 4'-0. 0.G 6'-0. O.G {'-O• aG Y-0 0.G Y-o• arc Y-f 0.G Y-0aG {'-O• QG Y-a• aG Y-e• aG Y-o' arc. J'-0' 0.G Y-0 161* aG ur O.C. 1D' O.C. 12. 0.0. 12.C. 2. 0.G 19. 0.G NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. Evergreen Tree Detail ree Detail �%;4 11WW Rum aut m4b.a11 hrwhw Low thaw ataat Raw ♦' depth of worn. mula ass pbhl pis - do not pin ash. Warr ram S. dah *rag Wain bark. plant pit with h0eoleed WOMB oil Smyth .vim d frown al hale Ras to Mekm Standard w Wows Slab b WWI, led des. Sal root het an maMurh.d .Who r oa,lhohd .a mar. meta.. bw. Word sauMhs oath INN. ale lade col mob 4d Winans taw. woe.. haat Wyhs eA etalhq Is WSW: Th wa an hats 6' ` smW. Para h teal Ward, alsal p th o.YN])' Ns,o .see w W. Pa 3 r e. hpYwtan saws rr out* and ides woo ..o la orals Na lb. ore WOWS.. a pdpnyey 40 as, t yr a was Noes wrapping h maid M ham wrapgrow.. upward to NW Wm.. Man 4• depth of ape.. mda an WA pin - b net pin wioehd Who farm J' amp sal.. than Book. H n on ,din .PedA.d Doc. he sally dam and bottom or how Behr 1 Merkel S.M. w Nw.ry Steil w W.. ball Win Sat roan ball an ...ea Am. or canOatad sod wood sat rig Wan nelad ..sn6n wb Mines des grads Mlebnleed rra0rslelrl,rwe. Inc MOM... Or. Ntlw Pr..Ian BM ROM MMIP4110 MX 1a6.Mi 1.e0p•6160 r. Pe et .1 Prepled for. Pettibone Properties Call 48 Hours before digging; GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 Planting Notes Contractor shoe provide one year guarantee of all plant materids. The guarantee begins on the date of the Landscape Architect's or Owner's written acceptance of the Initial planting. Replacement plant materials shall deo have o one year guarantee commencing upon planting. All plants to be specimen grade. Minnesota -grown and/or hardy. Specimen grade shall adhere to, but is not limited by, the following standards. All plants shall be free from disease, pests, wounds, sears, etc. All plants shall be free from noticeable gaps, holes, or deformities. All plonk shall be free from broken or dead branches. All plants shall have heavy, healthy branching and leafing. Coniferous trees shall have an established main leader and a height to width ratio of no less than 5:3. Plants to meet American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z60.1-2004) requirements for size and type specified. Plants to be Installed as per standard ANSI planting procticee. Use mmlmum 12" loam planting soil on trees and 6" on shrubs (saes and bottom of hole). Backfill soil to be existing top Boll from site free of roots, rocks larger than one Inch, subsoil debris, and large weeds. Contractor shall verify locations with all utgltlee prior to Installation of plants. Contractor shill contact Gopher State "One Call" (651-454-0002 or SOD-252-1166) to verify locations of all underground utilities. Staking of trees optlonol; reposition, plumb and stake if not plumb after one year. Wrap oll smooth -barked trees - fasten top and bottom. Remove by April 1. Open top of burlap on BB materials; remove pot on potted plants; split and break apart peat pots. Prune plants as necessary - per etondard nursery practice and to correct poor branching. Plants shall be immediately plonted upon arrival at site. Propedy heel -In materials if necessary, temporary only. All disturbed areas to be sodded unless otherwise noted: sod to be standard Minnesota grown and hordy bluegro. mix. All sod areas shall be prepared with 4• of topsoil and raked to remove debrh and ensure drainage. Slopes of 3:1 or greater shoN be staled. Four Inches of shredded hardwood bark mulch shall be used around dl trees within turf areas. All shrub planting beds (within sodded a eos) shall have weed barrier fabric, 4" of shredded hardwood bark mulch and Volley -View Black Diamond (or equal) poly edging. The edging shall be placed with smooth carves and at least 3' from the centers of evergreen trees Utilize curbs and sidewalks for edging where possible. Parking lot Islands to be shredded hardwood bark mulch.. Shredded hardwood bark mulch 4" deep eh. be provided in all planting beds adjacent to sidewalks and driveways. Actual location of plant material Is subject to field and site conditions. No planting willbe installed until all grading and construction has been completed m lne Immediate area. Contractor shall provide necessary watering of plant materials until the plant is fully established or irrigation system is operational. Owner will not provide water for Contractor. Provide irrigation to all planted areas on site. Irrigation will be design/build by Landscape Contractor. All Information about Installation and scheduling con be obtained from General Contractor. Repair. replace, or provide sod/seed os required for any roadway boulevord areas adjacent to the site die ..4 during construction. Repair all damage to property from planting operations at no cost to owner. No plant material substitutions will be accepted unless approval is requested of the Landscape Architect by the Landscape Contractor prior to eubmiesion of the bid and/or quotation. Shrub Detail 1 Hamel Town Center ear.w.Halls., nl d mar m maiw grounding W. mDooJW MN grads At plmh,9 boils doll rwW 4' at swig. more as ..ad banes lank Edge a gw1mMpp Mal..Hn lDadnld MN.r .hear aepwnt t. Ham sa Scarily Was end bottom of hale Back. plmn pit with woeo hack. hid 0' 30' 60' 90' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 12/08/06 6boe 8 on 8 20061155PLP01.DIVG Landscape Plan i ONORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "G" - RETAIL 1/r.r-o' 0 SOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "G" - RETAIL ve•=r-o• :;S' 1-- a ,:l t. '. it e =F ��V� L' ' 4(t 1 mi. BIM ;/MINYIw ,...wiiiIlk ill. - MINK =11=C1 : 11 i nN� MInni T n—■ n �■ Ifs MINnni ■ Hi Fir'1111 HICKEY THORSTENSON GROVER www. nt0-ananitacta. corn 9300 Hennepin Town Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tel: 952 278.8880 Fax: 952.278 8822 PROJECT HAMEL RETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA for: UNITED PROPERTIES EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS I HEREOF CERTIFY THAT MIS RAH, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY .ME OR AVER IAF DIRECT SUCRWSIOM AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT LAVER THE LAMS OF THE STATE Or 41NN!lOTA DATE BID SET REVISIONS DATE NO. gt ciexoBe ONORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "A" - CREDIT UNION vre-O• H/GHIV Ay H/GHWA Y NO. 55 55 45.00 1=uuuuuuuuuu 6.00 28.50 ezo n BUS-45 BUS-45 feet Width 8.50 Trock 8.50 Lock to Lock Time : 6.00 Steering Angle : 44.30 YN%. STEERING Mlac - 43.0 040. AASHTO 2001 (US) [ft) PATH Medina Planning Commission January 9, 2007 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes -- DRAFT Tuesday, January 9, 2007 1. Call to Order: Acting Chair Verbick called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Present: Planning Commissioners Mary Verbick, Jeff Pederson, Mark Bryant, Doug Dickerson, Sharon Johnson, Charles Nolan, and Robin Reid. Absent: None Also Present: City Administrator Chad Adams; City Planner Rose Lorsung; City Planning Consultant Jennifer Haskamp; Assistant to Planning Dusty Finke. 2. Public Comments: None 3. Introduction of Planning Commission members Planning Commissioners introduced themselves to each other and also to members of the gallery. 4. Election of Chair and Vice Chair Dickerson nominated Mary Verbick for Chair and Jeff Pederson for Vice Chair. Motion by Dickerson, seconded by Reid to approve Mary Verbick as Chair and Jeff Pederson as Vice Chair of the Planning Commission for 2007. Motion passes unanimously. 5. Update from City Council proceedings Council Member Weir presented an update from City Council. She welcomed Mark Bryant and Charles Nolan to the Commission. Weir stated that the Council wants to improve Planning Commission representation at Council meetings and that Finke will coordinate representation. Weir also noted that the Council is seeking a Planning Commissioner to represent the City at the Elm Creek Watershed. 6. City Planner's Report Lorsung stated that the February agenda will most likely be fairly light. A site plan, plat, CUP, and variance request will be heard for the Ferrelgas site. Additionally, a CUP amendment may be presented for the Three Rivers Park District. Lorsung suggested any suggestions from Commissioners because the agenda will so light. Reid agreed to give a report on the OSTF. Dickerson agreed to give a report on the Comprehensive Plan Committee. 1 Medina Planning Commission January 9, 2007 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Lorsung suggested the Commission have a discussion regarding net density and an overview of Medina's system statement. Johnson suggested an overview on the relationship between the City and the Met Council. Verbick inquired if there was money in the budget for PC members to go to Met Council trainings. Adams replied that there was money budgeted and it would be good for any members who had not yet been through a Comp Plan. 7. Approval of the December 13, 2006 Planning Commission Minutes Motion by Pederson, seconded by Johnson to approve the minutes with the grammatical correction suggested by Dickerson. Motion passes unanimously. 8. Functions and Values Assessment of Wetland Management Classifications discussion. Public Hearing Public Hearing opened at 7:20 p.m. Lorsung introduced Andie Moffitt from WSB and Associates. She also described some background on the process for assessing the City's wetlands and also the city's attempts in 2006 to establish a wetland ordinance. Moffit provided an overview on what occurs during a functional assessment of wetlands, how the functions of a wetland are classified, how most municipalities categorize wetlands (Preserve, manage I, manage II, mange III), and how policies can be implemented in relation to the wetlands. Moffitt described wetlands buffers. She explained their benefits and also a number of considerations a city needs to make if they were to establish buffers. Moffitt stated that the memo provided included some example buffer regulations in neighboring communities as well as area watershed districts. Moffitt described water level bounce (technical calculation of how wetland levels are changed by development) and sequencing flexibility (applicant demonstrating how they minimized wetland impacts) as regulation tools. Moffitt described how the City could increase its wetland mitigation ratio for high quality wetlands over the 2:1 required by the WCA. She stated that the City would be held to this mitigation as well (if they were putting in a road, for instance). Ratios could (although Moffitt stated that she does not support this) be decreased for lower quality wetlands. The City is held to the 2:1 ratio, so if they allow a 1:1 in low quality, they have to show proof of higher ratios in other places. 2 Medina Planning Commission January 9, 2007 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Moffitt stated that Minnehaha Creek is updating their Watershed Management Plan. Although the Plan may be complete by the end of January, rule -making will most likely not be completed until the early part of 2008. Lorsung stated that the City has to be at least as restrictive as Minnehaha Creek because they are, by far, the most restrictive watershed district within the City limits Johnson inquired why, if the goal is to conserve wetlands, 2:1 mitigation is required. She stated that if the goal is truly conservation, 1:1 makes more sense. Moffitt stated that this is to improve on historical damage to wetlands. Weir inquired what makes a wetland a high function wetland. Moffitt replied that they look for native vegetation that is diverse, acts as a wildlife habitat, and is not impacted by stormwater. Other wetlands are very high function for storm water treatment. Some wetlands are high function for flood control. Lorsung stated that the city is approximately 33% wetlands or water, and is adjacent to two impaired waterbodies. For these reasons, protecting wetlands are very important. Lorsung inquired about economic reasons for wetland protection. Moffitt replied that the PCA has requirements for storm water treatment. Wetlands can do some of this treatment at a much reduced cost. Lorsung added that the City survey showed that people moved to Medina for the Open Spaces and natural resources and that they can increase property values. Verbick stated that it is much cheaper to protect wetlands rather than mitigating and "fixing" wetlands. Dickerson inquired about WSB's timing, if they are going to be able to complete the functions assessment by the deadline. Moffitt stated there was some time in the fall to get some assessment completed. It seems likely that they should be able to follow the timeline, to be completed by the end of June 2007. Public Hearing closed at 8:04 p.m. 9. Bancor Group — Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Medina Country Club. Previously Postponed Public Hearing Pederson excused himself from the discussion as an adjoining property owner Lorsung delivered a brief staff report. Currently, the property is guided for public, 0 density. This would need to be changed through a comp plan amendment. Lorsung stated that the north and west perimeter of the Golf Course is being requested for residential guiding. The proposed development would be 49 units, for a density of 3.11 units/net acre. The applicant did submit trip generation counts from the development. Lorsung stated that the timing is a key concern, because the staff cannot complete a detailed analysis of the request without 3 Medina Planning Commission January 9, 2007 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) information from the broader Comprehensive Plan. Lorsung noted that in the past decade, the City has only gone through one Comp Plan Amendment. The City is already one year into the process of updating its Comp Plan, and is set to complete the update by the end of the year. Lorsung stated that approving this amendment would be planning in a vacuum, while the Comp Plan should really be completed at a regional and city-wide level. Lorsung stated that the staff recommends denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. There is not a large enough benefit to justify the City going against its guide plan, especially at this critical time in the process of updating the Comprehensive Plan. David Newman (President, Bancor Group) stated that Bancor has a long history working with the City in Wild Meadows. Newman stated that he believed both the Planning Commission and City Council seemed to have approved of the project and land use during the Concept Plan, with reservations about the timing. Because of this fact, the applicant will concentrate on the issue of timing. Newman described the historical issue of ownership with the Medina Country Club and Bruce Hendry's options to buy portions of the course for $1. The Club has a lease on the property on which the clubhouse and 18-hole course is located. Newman stated that the homes are mostly two -unit buildings, with one single-family home in the $675,000 price range. Newman stated that they disagree with staff on a number of issues. The site is a hole in a donut of development. It is fairly clear that the area around the golf course will be developed in the future. Newman stated that they do not believe that it requires significant infrastructure because sewer/water access exists just off of the site. The sewer capacity seems to be there already. He stated that the proposed development would lead to a traffic increase of about 3% and that the problems along CR116 seem to be a problem with a wider area, not this development. The applicant stated that they would pay for widening the intersections to allow for left and right turn lanes in both directions. The traffic problem is already there, and they want to help solve it. He stated that the 3.11 units/net acre does exceed the Met Council's minimum requirements. The applicant is willing to pay a consulting planner so it will not impact the city's Comp Plan update. He suggested that the reasons for approval are: ensures Country Club remains a golf course; fulfills the city's commitment to Cherry Hill residents; site is a hole in a donut of development; provide sewer and water to north side of Shawnee Woods at no cost; traffic concerns around Foxberry are improved. Public Hearing opened at 8:37 p.m. Don Cheney (President, Medina Golf and Country Club) stated that he is here to support the application. The golf club has had a long road to get to this point. The club does not currently own the par-3 golf course, which is an integral piece of being a family -oriented club. The club can purchase the par-3 if the development goes forward. In terms of timing, it has taken 10 years to get to this point already. Mr. Hendry currently could buy the par-3 for $1 and develop it within ordinance at any time. Medina Country Club is strongly in favor. Jill Volton (630 Shawnee Woods) read a letter from Eric Volton, speaking in opposition. They chose to move to Medina because of rural feel and open space. 20 homes are proposed 4 Medina Planning Commission January 9, 2007 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) where currently only 5 exist. He stated that it is contradictory to surrounding single family homes. Townhomes are proposed because it stands to increase profits for Bancor and the Golf Club. He stated that if he would have known that there was a chance this proposal would move forward at this time, they would not have purchased the property. Jill Volton added concerns about children safety in the area. Steve Theesfeld (600 Shawnee Woods) stated that area residents were not sent notice for this postponed meeting. He stated that a precedent could easily be set if this were to move forward. A private business made a deal a decade ago, and seeks to generate funds to bail themselves out by changing the city's overall Comprehensive Plan. He stated that this does not meet the high burden for approving a change to the Comp Plan. He stated that he purchased about 6 years ago, and did due diligence in researching the plans for the area. There will be a breach in the city's promises to the property owners along Shawnee Woods who weren't allowed sewer when their septics failed. He stated that an arborist told him that the area Old Growth Basswood forests have shallow root systems and any change in the water amounts can have a devastating effect, as can any construction traffic. Perhaps townhomes make sense on the east and west edges, but definitely not along Shawnee Woods. The applicant has stated that one of the reasons for approval is that they would provide sewer and water to the residents to the north. The people in the area have mostly updated their septics already, with the assumption that development would not occur for a number of years. He stated that the city made promises is to the people on Shawnee Woods, not Cherry Hill. Jeff Pederson (710 Shawnee Woods) stated that he has lived in Foxberry for 20 years and purchased property along the golf course (4412 CR 116) to some day put in a home. He stated that he disagreed with previous speakers. Development of the par-3 would have a much larger impact on traffic. He stated that he is aware of the difficult financial situation of the club. He stated that this Concept Plan amendment is different than previously rejected concepts because it is surrounded by development. The Comprehensive Plan update will almost certainly include this property. He stated that infrastructure already exists, and it will allow the city to loop sewer and water. The project makes sense for the City, even if it doesn't make sense for the residents along Shawnee Woods. This alternative is much preferable to development of the par-3, which would most likely develop soon afterwards if this project does not move forward. Bancor is a quality developer. He stated that timing is of the essence. He also stated that he would like to go on record requesting that 4412 CR116 be zoned the same as the perimeter property is zoned. Reid stated that it is a nice looking project and the location makes sense. She was curious if this project couldn't be reviewed at the time when the draft Comp Plan update is completed. It is too early to approve it right now. Bryant stated 60% of the property owners are present even though the notice did not go out. With due respect to the Shawnee Woods residents, the development of the par-3 portion of the course is the lesser of two evils. Even if the timing is inconvenient, timing is often of the essence. He would vote to approve of the Comp Plan amendment. 5 Medina Planning Commission January 9, 2007 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Lorsung explained that the notice was sent, as required, in December, but the application was postponed at the last moment. The city's practice has been to rely on people to keep track of items if they were postponed and to not re -notice. Verbick stated that she wished that a statement be added to the notice that there is a chance the public hearing could be postponed, and if so, to keep track and that it most likely would occur at the next meeting. Lorsung stated that residential density on the par-3 course has already been approved by the Met Council. If this is reduced, it will have to be made up for in other places, so this perimeter development won't increase the density. Bryant stated that it seems like it "could be developed." It doesn't have to be, if it is made up for somewhere else. He stated that the golf course develops a culture. Nolan inquired if the owner of the property were to come in next month, what density could they build without a Comp Plan amendment. Lorsung replied that the par-3 is zoned MR and guided UR, which means it is likely to be between 3-5 units/net acre. Nolan inquired what the square footage of the homes would be. Newman replied that the footprints are approximately 2,000 sq. ft. per level along with a garage. Nolan inquired why it isn't being presented as a swap for the par-3. Newman replied that in order for the bank to get financing, the bank wants to have developable land as collateral. Dickerson inquired about the watertable issue. Newman replied that they had wanted to place single family homes along the north. They conducted soil borings and found the water table was extremely high. Because of this, the slab -on -grade townhomes are really the only marketable option. Dickerson inquired what the soonest this could get through the Comp Plan process. Lorsung replied that it is likely a year and a half to get in the ground. Newman stated that if the Met Council conducted a minor amendment, it could be done in 4-5 months. Adams replied that the Bridgewater amendment took approximately two years to get through the Met Council. 6 Medina Planning Commission January 9, 2007 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Dickerson stated that at the Planning Commission level, the economics shouldn't play a role. The golf course could sell the par-3 and develop it just as easy as Hendry. He stated that he likes the concept, likes the use, but is concerned about CR116. Adams stated that looking at this application within a vacuum misses a tremendous opportunity to plan from a regional perspective. Within the Comp Plan, the City can consider what Maple Grove and Corcoran are going to do. Maybe a four lane highway is needed here. If the city approves of this, it misses the opportunity to consider that. While sewer capacity may not be a concern, water infrastructure is of major concern. Cherrey stated that the golf course has no intent on developing the par-3. If they sold the par-3, they would lose a member based. The club is not a business, it is a non-profit. Johnson stated that the Planning Commission should think of the City as a whole. The PC should not consider an individual neighborhood, or a particular business. She stated that it is presumptuous to assume you know how the Comp Plan will occur. She felt the City was pushed into a corner with the reguiding of the par-3 and that she was opposed then. Certain people put pressure on the City that the club would go under. The exact same thing is happening now. Everyone is making assumptions. Even if the course were to go under, it would still be zoned as public/semi-public. There is no reason to be pushed into a decision. If a less -than -fortuitous decision was made previously with the reguiding of the par-3, and the club supported it, how can it be assumed that this would automatically solve the problem? She urged Commissioners to look at it from a city-wide perspective, not narrowly. Nolan stated that it is obviously a difficult decision. Lundgren is good, and it is a good use of the property. However, it is a circumventing of the process. He stated that the par-3 is left with the opportunity to develop. To plan in the long term based on this business decision does not make sense. The property owners in the area did their due diligence when purchasing, and it is unfair to circumvent the process. He stated that he liked the development, and if it was a different time, he would most likely support it. Bryant stated that he was not looking at it as if they were under the pressure of the gun. Just because a decision was made about the par-3 in the past, doesn't mean it's a good decision now. The City is basically locked into allowing Hendry to develop the par-3 if he wanted to move forward. The impact of the perimeter has a lesser impact on the wider community than the development of the par-3. Nolan inquired into the density issue. Lorsung stated that during the last Comp Plan process, the Met Council required 3 units/net acre. Now they are requiring 3-5 units. It is not possible at this time to know where the city sits because of the change in how Met Council figures net density. It was originally estimated at about 2 units/net acre, but may be different. There has not been enough planning to answer a lot of these questions. Medina is used to low -density development, and could be forced into a position where it would be necessary to see much higher density. 7 Medina Planning Commission January 9, 2007 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Verbick stated that from a planning perspective, this seems like a poor choice. The city should be careful about making amendments unless there is dire need to do so. Public Hearing closed at 9:51 p.m. Motion by Reid, seconded by Dickerson to recommend denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment at this time. Motion passes (Opposed: Bryant; Abstention: Pederson) 10. RJ Ryan Company, Peter Hasselquist — Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure over 3000 so. ft. — 2705 Willow Drive. Previously Postponed Public Hearing Finke delivered the staff report. He stated that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct an accessory structure with a footprint of 8,040 square feet. Ordinances allow for accessory structures in excess of 3,000 aggregate square feet within rural residential only with a CUP. Finke noted that many properties in the area had existing CUPs for accessory structures. Finke noted the materials do match the home on the property and that the applicant is proposing additional plantings. He stated that staff is recommending coniferous trees in addition to deciduous in order to ensure year-round screening. Finke stated that the height of the barn exceeds that of the home, which violates section 825.19 of the ordinances. He stated that the applicant is claiming that the structure is a farm building, which is exempted from the height regulation. Staff is of the opinion that the building does not meet the definition of farming or agriculture, and if the City were to say that it is a farm building, could set a dangerous precedent. Finke noted that the City is requesting a right-of- way easement along Willow Drive. He stated that the city engineer recommends serving the barn off of the existing access onto Willow Drive, but the applicant is eligible for a second curb cut if they enter into a driveway agreement. He concluded the staff recommends denial of the CUP as long as the height of the barn violates city ordinances. Public Hearing opened at 10:17 p.m. Brian Trombley (RJ Ryan) stated that the structure is attractive and obviously looks like a barn. While there is some discussion over if it is a farm building or a barn, he stated that the floor plan of the first floor includes horse stalls, a chicken coop, a gardening room, and storage space for equipment. He stated that while the owner may not receive his primary income from farming, there are large portions of the property that are used for agriculture. Trombley stated that the property owner has stated they were open to planting a mix of coniferous trees as requested by staff and also they were willing to discuss the right-of-way easement with staff. He stated that the second issue is necessary to get a tractor and trailer to the barn area. He stated that the first floor is designed for the farm. The second floor is 12 feet in height and is designed for recreation. He stated that the height issue is made worse by the fact that the home is a Cape Cod design with large eaves which penalizes its height. He stated that they believe over 50% of the property could be used for agriculture, so it should be seen as "principally" for farming. Dickerson inquired about the trench drains and the holding tanks. He also inquired about where hay would be located and how it would be brought to the horses. 8 Medina Planning Commission January 9, 2007 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Trombley replied that there is a lot of cold storage where hay could be stored. Dickerson stated he would vote to deny the CUP because it is unsafe. He stated that he is concerned with the people on the second floor. He stated that he believed the ordinance should take into effect the height of firetruck ladders. He stated the City should consider safety in approving a CUP. He stated the property is not for agriculture; just because it is built like a barn doesn't mean it is used as a barn. He stated that it should be reviewed very carefully by the farm marshal. Finke described one option the Commission could take; to approve of the use (an 8,040 square foot accessory structure) conditioned on the proposed structure meeting all height regulations. Additionally, he noted that the Commission could table the application until the February meeting. Lorsung stated that as currently proposed, the only way the application could move forward would be if the applicant would request a variance. Verbick stated that from her experience, a variance of this type would seem very difficult to meet the six criteria. Verbick stated that she did not believe the City could decide arbitrarily that this structure is a farm building. The City needs to decide how it is going to deal with these large buildings that are not for agriculture, because it seems there are more and more being proposed. Verbick stated that the safety issue is a major concern as well, because the city doesn't only have to protect the owners, but also its firefighters. Bryant stated that he has horses and a hobby farm, and it seems that what is occurring at this property is really the same thing, a hobby farm. The second level is a play room, having nothing to do with farming It is not going to pass as a farm. The roofline seems like it could be massaged down to get closer to the height regulation. He stated that the size of the structure is going to be very imposing on Willow Drive, being only about 170 feet from the road. Johnson stated that because of the septic issue and the safety issue, she should feel remiss in sending this forward. Nolan stated that the footprint size hit him harder than even the height issue. The building is really 16,000 square feet over the two floors. Reid stated that she had a hard time imagining a recreation room over 2 '/z times the size of her house. The structure is going to be huge and will send a message across the City to every hobby farm that "you too can have a huge barn." Nolan stated that the width of the structure seems to be driving its height up as well. Pederson stated that he would deny the CUP because of the height issue and because no septic information was submitted. 9 Medina Planning Commission January 9, 2007 Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) Bryant stated that identifying where the hay will be stored is important. Finke suggested that the Commission consider tabling the application until February so that the applicant would not have to start from scratch on the process. Motion by Nolan, seconded by Bryant to table the application until the February Planning Commission meeting. Motion passes unanimously. 11. Michael & Kalli Ahlstrom — Variances from side- and front -yard setbacks and impervious surface maximums — 4565 Pine Street (PID 18-118-23-24-0168). Public Hearing Public Hearing opened at 10:52 p.m. Haskamp delivered the staff report. She stated that 3 variances are requested on the relatively small lot. A fair amount of variances have been granted within the Independence Beach area. Haskamp noted that the DNR does not support unless storm water is treated on -site. Dickerson inquired if the oak tree on the west side will be removed. The applicant replied that it would be. Dickerson inquired if the applicant couldn't just plant a few trees to absorb the extra water. Haskamp stated that it would need to be shown that the trees could satisfactorily treat the stormwater. She noted that the stormwater issue was already covered under a condition. Public Hearing closed at 10:54 p.m. Motion by Reid, seconded by Nolan to recommend approval of the variances with the conditions described in the staff report (with change to require 1-foot contours). Motion passes unanimously. 12. Schedule representation for 2007 City Council meetings Finke requested that Commissioners sign up for dates to attend City Council meetings. 13. Adiourn — The Commission adjourned without objection at 10:58 p.m. 10 Agenda Item: 6 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, Assistant to Planning DATE: February 6, 2007 MEETING: February 13, 2007 Planning Commission SUBJ: RJ Ryan/Hasselquist Conditional Use Permit 2705 Willow Drive — Continuation of a Tabled Public Hearing General On October 2, 2006, RJ Ryan Company, on behalf of property owner Peter Hasselquist, applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct a 7,200 square foot accessory structure at 2705 Willow Drive (PID# 16-118-23-41-0004). The applicant amended the plans to be over 8,000 sq. ft. and 28 feet tall. The Planning Commission spoke generally in opposition to a structure that size and tabled the application to allow the applicant to adjust their plans. They have, since that time, amended the plans to make the structure 7,400 square feet in size and 22.5 feet in height. City ordinances (Section 825.19) state that a residential property over 3 acres in size are permitted a maximum of two accessory structures or an aggregate size of 3,000 square feet. However, additional accessory structures (number or size) are conditional uses in properties over 5 acres in size. Again, please note that since the application was tabled during the January meeting, the applicant has reduced the proposed structure in both size and height. Site Details 2705 Willow Drive is a 17.63 acre parcel zoned as Rural Residential (RR). There are a number of CUPS in the area allowing accessory structures in excess of 3,000 square feet. Skyrock Farm is directly to the north, which has an existing CUP for a commercial horse facility. The Planning Commission and City Council recently approved of a CUP for a 15,000 sq. ft. accessory structure at the Evanson property to the northeast. There are numerous other CUPS in the area as well (see map below: the purple properties have existing CUP for accessory structures in excess of 3000 sq. ft.; the green properties are existing commercial horse facilities). Halt CC ARIC RES DI3 Hasselquist property (2705 Willow Dr) There are wetlands located in the southwest corner of the property, but all construction will be set back over 180' and no impacts are to be made. Existing structures on the property include the home, a swimming pool with pool house, a gazebo, a playhouse, a corn crib, and an existing building that will be demolished in order to construct the new barn. Additionally, a tennis court is located north of the home. (see aerial of property below). 2705 WILLOW DR f - j1611823410004 PETER L HASSELQUIST ET AL i=i n ---sae. R:mmw. Building Details The proposed structure has a footprint of 7,400 square feet in size and will take the place of an existing building of approximately 1,550 square feet. The barn does have proposed animal use, both a chicken coop and horse stalls, and meets the required 150' setback for animal structures. The applicant did submit a septic design, including holding tanks for floor drains, which the building official is reviewing. Preliminarily, it looks like the design will be satisfactory. At the previous public hearing, Commissioners expressed fire safety concerns for the structure. The fire marshal again was routed the updated plans and gave feedback. He stated that the structure appears to meet the fire code. While he did note that sprinkling the structure or adding a monitored heat detector system could help, it is not a requirement within the fire code and it has not been requested of any other similar barn. Construction of the barn seems to impact four significant trees along the northwest corner of the building. However, the plans do show eight new deciduous trees planted along Willow Drive to provide additional screening. Staff is recommending a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees in this area in order to ensure year-round screening. The plans show an additional driveway to be installed to service the barn, along with a new curb cut along Willow Drive. City ordinances (section 400.11) do allow for two curb cuts if certain regulations (100' frontage, acceptable storm water plan) are met and if the property owner enters into an agreement with the City which includes terms and conditions of the additional driveway. This property meets the minimum regulations for having two curb cuts, although the City Engineer is recommending that access be granted off of the existing driveway. City ordinances RJ Ryan/Hasselquist CUP 2 February 13, 2007 Planning Commission do expressly allow for conditions to be set on the amount of access points in the process of reviewing a Conditional Use Permit. If the Planning Commission is to recommend approval of a second driveway, staff recommends discussion of any terms or conditions to be added to the driveway agreement that must be entered into between the owner and the City. Building Height The proposed structure is now approximately 22.5 feet in height, figured using the City ordinance definition of building height (from the average between the peak and the eave). This does not take into consideration the decorative elements on the roof, which have a gross height of 42 feet from ground level (see below). In this case, from the information we have available, it appears the single family home is approximately 24 feet in height. pF. mQ — �= =r r -- ». "V •A% �r_y�,urFa ..rx.n 42' gross height MEY.ms A3 Conditional Use Permit Ordinance Compliance While reviewing Conditional Use Permits, City ordinances (Section 825.39) state that the City should consider the following: Subd.1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. Staff believes that the similarity between this use and uses in the area will not present issues for property enjoyment. Additionally, screening of the barn will actually be improved. Subd. 2. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. There is no vacant property in the area that will likely develop under current guiding and zoning. RJ Ryan/Hasselquist CUP 3 February 13, 2007 Planning Commission Subd. 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. The City's engineer has reviewed the plans and do not bring forward any major issues, except for suggesting only one curb cut to the property. Subd. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. There will be no commercial use of the structure, so no additional parking or loading is necessary. Subd. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. The City will require any lighting to comply with Section 829.04, where all lighting must be downcast in order to maintain a dark sky rural area. Subd. 6. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. Staff believes that the proposed barn is consistent with uses in the area and to the overall rural character of Medina. Subd. 7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. The proposed use (a storage barn) is consistent with the purposes of the rural residential district. Subd. 8. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City. Staff believes the use is consistent with the "diversified rural" guiding. Subd. 9. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. There will be no commercial use of this facility, and the use is consistent with many in the surrounding areas. Traffic impacts should, therefore, be similar to those by neighboring parcels. Subd. 10. Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. The only business in the area is Skyrock Farm, a commercial horse facility. The Hasselquist property is relatively well screened from the north side and has little lighting. Subd.11. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project. The applicant was already seeking a building permit before becoming aware that a CUP was necessary. Construction should start in the spring of 2007. Subd.12. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning Officer. The property owner signed on to the application from the start. RJ Ryan/Hasselquist CUP 4 February 13, 2007 Planning Commission Right -of -Way Easement Currently, the City does not have dedicated right-of-way along the west side of Willow Drive adjacent to this property. The property line actually extends into Willow Drive. The City does hold a prescriptive easement over the traveled road because it funds the maintenance. Usually, the City will receive right-of-way when an owner plats property. The City has started a precedent of requesting right-of-way easements during the review of land use projects that border city streets where there is no right-of-way. The City will bear the cost of preparing all easement documents and filing them. Staff is excited to further discuss with the applicant the possibility of establishing this easement. City Discretion The City has a relatively low level of discretion when it comes to reviewing Conditional Use Permits. If the application meets City ordinances, the CUP should be approved. However, the City may impose conditions on the approval that protect the best interests of the surrounding community and the city as a whole. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions: 1) The applicants and owners shall warrant that the farm building proposed is for private use only, and that no commercial and/or fee -based horse boarding or training, storage or other activities shall occur; 2) This CUP permits the following accessory structures on the property at a maximum, as shown within the plans received on January 22, 2007: a 7,400 sq. ft. barn, a 3,815 sq. ft. pool and pool deck, a pool house/porch, a play house, a gazebo, and a corn crib; 3) The applicant shall meet requirements of the MPCA with regard to manure management; 4) The applicant shall ensure that no grazing may occur within the wetlands on the property; 5) The applicant shall submit a septic design acceptable by the City prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed barn; 6) The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and demolish the existing 1,532 sq. ft. accessory building before construction of the proposed barn; 7) The applicant shall add coniferous trees in place of or in addition to the proposed trees shown in the plans to the southeast of the proposed barn to ensure year-round screening; 8) If a second curb cut is allowed off of Willow Drive, the applicant must execute a driveway agreement with the City as required by Medina Code section 410.11; 9) If the area disturbed by grading is greater than 1 acre in area, the applicant shall present the city with a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and also proof that the SWPPP was approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; 10) The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; and 11) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in the amount sufficient to pay for all costs associated with the review of the Conditional Use Permit application. Attachments 1) Site Map 2) Applicant Letter 3) Plans dated 1-22-07 (including survey, site plan, floor plans, elevations) 4) Photo illustrating height of single family home on property 5) City Engineer memo dated 1-30-07 RJ Ryan/Hasselquist CUP 5 February 13, 2007 Planning Commission Site Location: 2705 Willow Drive sparzem Ei=1 lr.. VOA Cr= A RiElefliff.a=inr.lairmL...01 ...4 •" III riar-23:1 07.11"; nu 11, ,dwatzursmallag962atiltil-Itna EX .' iiiiEtraijniniligigiSWPneriati za ISEIrLIN v-Val_r Plki. AI: 1:ffir will 21, ar ilalell I iniallA ilrolliff:wizmovi Pr ill l1...rezdauinw ; - !Nil I!■iMEMl S2 MAvail PinailinCrrairl, Co 6---,;,,:,,CI im Bilk imanimvit Ain A Imp lempo IN...samosa imingpres. Medina Street & Address Finder Map 41 42 OA Construction, Inc. 1100 Mendota Heights Road • Mendota Heights, MN 55120 • (651) 681-0200 • Fax (651) 681-0235 January 18, 2006 City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Hamel, MN 55340 Attn: Planning Staff Re: 2705 Willow Drive Medina, MN Dear Planning Staff: As the owner's representative, we are requesting a conditional use permit to construct a barn structure that is 7400 s.f. (4400 s.f. over the 3000 s.f. maximum). This structure will be used for hobby farming, personal horse stalls and storage of personal equipment (no portion of this barn will be used for commercial horse boarding or storage). This structure has been placed on the 16 acre property to allow access from Willow Drive and be screened by the existing landscaping north of new drive and additional trees planted south of new drive. Since the last Council Meeting we have reduced the total square footage of the building by 640 s.f. and more importantly we have reduced the total height of the structure over 12' to conform to the Accessory Structure Height Ordinance. We hope that with the revisions made and the conformance to the City Ordinances you will approve and support this request for a Conditional Use Permit. We are willing to work with the Planning staff and their recommendations. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions. Sincerely, R.J. RYAN O -'' ,' ION, INC. Brian Trombley Project Manager BT:bk Hasselquist Residence Planning Staff 10-25-06.doc An Equal Opportunity Employer RECEIVED DEC 2 1 2006 Bonestroo 0 Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects January 30, 2007 Mr. Dusty Finke Assistant to Planning City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Hamel, Minnesota 55340 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 Office: 651- 636- 4600 • Fax: 651- 636- 131 1 www.bonestroo.com Re: CUP — 2705 Willow Drive BRA File No. 000190-07000-1 Plat No. 406 Dear Dusty, We have reviewed the revised plans for the proposed building at 2705 Willow Drive, dated January 18, 2007. The proposal is to build a residential out -building and add an additional access from Willow Drive. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters: • The proposed floor elevation, contours, and spot elevations shown on the site plan differ from those shown on the building permit survey. These should be revised such that all sheets are in agreement. • It appears that access to the proposed building can be provided from the existing driveway. Therefore, we do not recommend a second access off Willow Drive be provided. • The city should consider requesting that the applicant provide a 33 foot right of way along Willow Drive. • The erosion and sediment control shown on the plans must be installed and maintained to city standards. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (651) 604-4894. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Darren Amundsen Cc: Tom Kellogg Bonestroo recently rrerged with DSU, bringing together sore of the best regional talents in engineering, architecture, planning, landscape architecture, and urban design. Cur combined team now provides integrated services in one organization. • St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN ■ Milwaukee, WI ■ Chicago, IL Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned POND EXISTING TREES — TO EE REmovo (-n?.) 2 0" \ 48.-0" , „ --„. \ ) , —"\, \ , - -,_ _ \ , i ,I , ------- , , ,, \ \\ \ z--) 1--- '',_PROPOSE] .s. *„ ' SEPTIC AREA, \ \ , , , \ \ VER.IFY W/ G.C. \ \♦ , EXIST. BLDG.—, \ TO BE DEMOLISHED • \ SITE PLAN AlSCALE: 1" = 30' „\ NORTH PROPOSED TREES (a THUS) VERIFY OTY. & LOC'N W/ C.C., MIX PINE TREES & 2.5" OAK [NILS ONCRETE PAVERS ANEW LOC'N FCF LXIS I. UGH I POLL, VERIFY WI C.C. —EX STING RAVERS / TO EE RELOCATED/ / RECONFIGURED ..—EXIST. LIGHT ' POLE TO BE RELOCATED EXISTING WOODED AREA e ) SITE INFORMATION, ZONING: RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 7,400 S.F. PER FLOOR SHADED AREAS ,,\ INDICATES NEW POURED CONC. i \ DRIVE § 1 / / I zl ( 1 / 0 / I I "i24 / GARDEN \\ Epas-4G , EXIST NG woREAoog\ / ( A „—BENCHMARK, t / SEE SURVEY , j g ) (y17, , 11 4 / / / Ct- / - / \ NOTE TO ALL DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTORS AND THEIR SUE —CONTRACTORS: THE DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBLE FCR REVIEWING ALL MECHANICAL, ELECTRICA.L, PLUMBING, FIRE SPRINKLER, CR ANY OTHER DESIGN/BUILD SUB— CONTRACTOR'S DOCUMENTS AS PERTAINING TO THE WORK FOR THIS PROJECT. IT IS THE DESIGN/BUILD SUB— CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE DESIGIVELILD CONTRACTOR OF ANY CONF1JCTS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS DUE TO SIZES. LOCATIONS. QUANTITIES, RCUGH—IN DIMENSIONS AND CODE INTERPRE— TATIONS. THE DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE ARCHITECT IMMED ATELY OF ANY ARCHITECTJRA_ REVISIONS REQUIRED DUE TO THE COOR— DINATION OF EACH DESIGN/BUILD SUB —CONTRACTOR'S DOCUMENTS. LAMPERT ARCHITECTS 13E37 NE Lincoln S1reef Ham Lake. k.11,1 55304 1111 Pl.nt:763.755.121I F.:76-3 757.2849 lonparIC arnporl—orch.aom ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION, HEP.EEIT CERTIFY THAT MS PLAN. SPECIFICATION or, REPORT WAS PRF_PARED ey NE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERIASION AND THAT I AM h DULY UCDLISF_D ARCHLTECT LAWS OF THE OTA 0) i... PEIN 13669 u`O hcrie (651) 681-0200 Fox (651) 681-0235 RjRyan Construction, Inc. -noo Mendota heights Pd. Mendota Haigh., MN 55120 0 LL. t71,0 C 1-6-1 L.1.1 2705 Willow Drive, Medina, Minnesota Copyright 2007 Lsonare import Aretitgcts. P.A. Project Designer:19'N R. Drown By. BJR Checked By: LL/LML Revisions 10.02.06 ISSUED 12.15.06 OWNER REVISIONS 01.02.07 REISSUED 01.18.07 CITY COMMENTS SITE PLAN Sheet Number Project No. 050602-1 NE39'02'30"W NO-24.39"E 1324.79 • CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, Dion, or report woe prepare.," by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws pf the state of tviinnesa enneth L Whitehom Date: 10-02-06 Minnesota Lend Surveyor Number 14677 2705 WILLOW DRIV EDINA, INN SOTA Engineers Surveyors Landscape Architects Hansen Thorp Penton Olson Inc. 7510 Market flocs Drive Ulm Prot.. 911 55344-3644 (952) 629-0700 F. (952) 529-7606 A.E 150' BUILDING SETE.A.CK. 72,5 6,7? LEGAL DESCRIPTION 116 PL1T OF SCsko,,..n.---- FIvivs ALL THAT PART OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 118 NORTH, RANGE 23, 'WEST, LYING WESTERLY OF THE F011 OWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF. 471.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LINE BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE DEFLECTING LEFT 51'56. A DISTANCE OF 156 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HALING A RADIUS OF 500 FEET, AND DELTA ANGLE OF 22'42. A DISTANCE OF 198.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON A LINE TANGENT TO THE END'OF LAST SAID 494.2 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 4000 AND DELTA ANGLE OF .5'36l A DISTANCE OF 390.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON A LINE TANGENT TO THE END OF LAST SAID CURVE 19C FEET, MORE OR LESS, TC THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, AND THERE ENDING. NOTES 1. This exhliit was completed without the benefit of title work the legal description shown is based on Hennepin County Tax Assessor Records. 2. The basis of bearings is assumed. 3. The area of the property described cbove Is 767,819 square feet or 17.63 acres. 4. The wetlands depicted on this drawing were extrapolated from a document provided by the City of Me.dlna without benefit of field verification ur measurement • 5. The impervious areas are as follows for the site, old barn 1,532 sq. ft., existing drive 8,329 so. Ft., ' concrete around pool and house 3,815 sq ft., Flagstone walkwoy 735 sq. ft, tennis court 5,460 sq. ft., existing house 3,269 sq. ft, and deck/porch 577 sq. ft., for an existing coverage of 18.257 sq. ft, and the proposed with be proposed born of 7,200 sc, ft., proposed concrete of 6,385 sq. ft., proposed drive of 2,282 sq. ft. for a proposed coverage of 38,052 sq. ft. 6. Septic site ehown for refe-ence only, site must be approved by city prior to construction. 7. Unadjusted earthwork estimates Cut-300 cubic yards and FIII-1800 cubic yards. LEGEND TREE LINE " DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION WETLAND SILT FENCE Scale 0 in feet , N. 'N.,. NN • 1111111111111111110eilliiiieel 1•11111111111111111•11 80 120 O 1—(7) a) co ri; 98'-0" -40 4" MSY. VENEER-_, I Wl 10" MSY. , BACK -LIP (TYP ) 4' -0" 8.-0" LINE OF —, 0 VERHP.N G ABOVE, TYP,, 7.4 ca 1711111111111.....11.111MINI1111611111111110111111MIMIMMI i ,:fds-tb TRENCH—, DRAIN CENTERED IN TARN —VER IFf STALL " CONS T. Vi/ GEN. CONTR. 30.-0" 20.-0" 12.-C 12'-0" -F.B.. 12.x12' i. HORSE STALL (3 TI ILIS) I ri 1,1 'H I I III! 11-10,t I I 1!!!! 9.-4" 11.-7" 24.-0" 11'-7" F.B.- cigij HCRSE BARN {1061 2'x2" DOOR - 12" A.F.F. W/ RAMP UP (1€-.A4`, a. 'co c" CHICKEN COOP I os 19 RISERS 7.68" = 12' 2" VERIFY CONST. TYPE G.C. .4-8" MSY. L_ 1/3" SLOPE TO DRAIN . (TYP.) ! _ iry 16"-C" — SUPPORTED CONC. STOOP —10" MSY. ro 28'-6" • I I UP , 19R of)1,3, STORAGE 11041 15111=1111111MulisimmiMMINIRMiumins1111111111111111mlimismollWAINIMIllom ININIIIIIIMMIlleil A EMEMEMIMEINEM MIMMENTIMEMEM Wi 1.111.111 TRENCH DRAIN CENTERED AT O.H. DOOR (2 THUS) STORAGE EFINISHED OFoL DC! Ll 18.-0" SATHR 11021 1 8- MSY. (.102,1 U TIUTY-. °I) SINK - I II UTILITY ROOM 7 in licK I IwAs-12, TUB SINK GARDEN MSY. 001.1 H.B. 0,13) P o 111.11.1.1.11111111111.11.11 ll o 1111.1111111111111.111111111111111 1111111111111111111111 Mama 1-4 1/8" SLOPE TO DRAIN , (TYP.) (gig) WOP.K. BENCH 3ASE & JPPER CABS. (5' 98' 0" BO"- 0" STORAGE 12011 oh FINISHED FLOOR EL. = 1 2'-2" 25.-0" 25-0" WOOD TRUSS WALL & FRAMING, VERIFY DESIGN W/ TRUSS MAt•JUFACTURER GA.TE, G.C. TO VERIFY DESIGN [ DN W/ OWNER 1119R UNE OF BLK. WALL BELOW I 4'-9" VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF. WOOD TRUSS WALL & FRAMING, VERIFY DESIGN W/ TRUSS MANUFACTURER t! EFiN I S=H EDL4F_L 02,0P. RECREATION ROOM 12001 NOTE: VERIFY A -PC ACCESS LOCAT1CN W/ C.C. dc OWNER 6" VERIFY W/ TRUSS ?,IANUF, HIGH -BAY GLASS—, BLOCS WOW. AT NORTH & SOUTH WALLS (2 THUS FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: /8" = 1'-0° TH - UNE OF OVERHANG ABOVE, TYP. 75.-0" 75.-0" SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: va• = 1.-0• NORTH /9-.%• . LAMPERT ARCHITECTS 13837 NE Lincoln Street -=---- Ham Lake. MN 55304 I riI Phone:763.755.1211 ,3x:763.757.2840 lornperWlampert—arch.com ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THLS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PRET-.ARED BY ME OR UNDER I, C RECT SUPERVIS,UN AND IHAI I AN Ip CULT LICENSED ARCH CT U I OF THE Ek LE . PP t. • 135,49 SKILrf: Phone (651) 681-0200 Fox (551) 581-0235 RjRyon Construction, Inc. 0 LL C LL1 a LU Copyrighf 2007 Project Designer: BEN R. Drown By. MJG, BJR Checked By: LL/LML Revisions 1C.02.05 ISSUED 12.15.06 OWNER REVISIONS 01.02.07 REISSUED 01.18.07 CITY COMMENTS FLOOR PLANS Sheet Number Project No. 060602-1 PREFAB. DECORATIVE ARCH. LOUVER, WHITE COLOR. TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE JAMES HARDIE BRAND SIDING,:_ BOARD & BATTEN STYLE, LIGHI YELLOW COLOR TO MATCH EXIST. HOJSE TOP OF ROOF WALL MOUNTED DOWPICAST LIGHT FIXTURE JAMES HARDIE BRAND—`: TRIM BOARDS, WHITE COLOR, TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE 4 2ND FLOOR Y EL. = 112'-2 DECORATIVE CARRIAGE LANTERNS TO MATCH EXISTING HCLSE a" ARCH CONC. BLK,. VENEER. W/ 10" CONC. BLK. BACK. -LP (TYP.) • FINISHED FLOOR • EL. = 100`-0" TOPEL OFy3., FOOTING C}% 4 TOP OF ROOF EL. = 132'-4"f FINISHED FLOOR EL. = 100'-0" i. TOP OF FOOTING EL... 3C-8" 0 m C INSUL. HOLLOW MTL. MAN DOOR & FRAME (4 THUS) BURGUNDY COLOR _� 12'- "x10'-0" iNSUL-J OVERHEAD DOOR (2 THUS) BURGUNDY CCLOP. 5'-0"x6'-0" INSUL HOLLOW MTL. DBL. owl? & IiAML, BJRGUNDY COLOR Z `RP.EFAB. DECORATIVE CORNICE, WHITE COLOR. TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE — 1--_, H — I_-'--r-1 -ram-T 1 NORTH ELEVATION J SCALE: 1/B" = 12"Wx13 H BLK. 16"Wx8"H BLK. -- 12"Wx16"H BLK.. L I 16"Wx12"H BLI..—t 16"W`.;4"H BLH. 16"Wx16"H BLK. JAMES HARDIE BRAND TRIM BOARDS, WHITE COLOR TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT SHINGLES, MATCH EXIST. HOUSE COLOR JAMES HARDIE BRAND—., `\ FASCIA BOARDS, WHITE I 1 COLOR TO MATCH EXIST. .1 HOUSE JAMES HARDIE BRAND TRIM BOARDS, WHITE COLOR. TO MATCH EXST. HOUSE (TYP. AT WDWS. DOORS) 1 I I 1 I I I 1I� 4" ARCH. CONC. BLK.. VENEER W/ 10" CONC. BLK. SACK -UP, STONE CAP TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE (TYP.) 24"Wx8"H BLK. 16"Wx24' H — 12"Wx8"H BLK. ♦-16"Wx.8 H BLK. r x12"H BLK. ` 16"Wx12"H 3LK. NOTE: BLOCK PATTERN ACHIEVED USING 4" MAS-ERBLOCK BRAND "SPLYT STONE QUARRY SERIES" ARCHITECTURAL BLK. (51 MASONRY VENEER PATTERN A3 / SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-D" 30. h I-r SOUTH ELEVATION - � 1 I o-O'iy.10'-0" INSUL. OVERHEAD DOOR, BURGUNDY COLOR I 1' r-- WEST ELEVATION �I I �I I DECORATIVE ARCH. COL TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE (2 THUS) WHITE COLOR, TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" I II 4'-0"x4'-0" GLASS BLOCK ININDOW (16 THUS) JAMES HARDIE BRAN) TRIM BOARDS, WHITE COLOR TO MATCH EXIST. HOUSE a fi-1 1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: lie - V-0" LAM P E R T ARCHITECTS 13837 NE Lincoln Slrael Ham Loke. MN 55304 1111 Pho no:763.755.1:11 =ox:763.757.1640 lompertelamperi—orch.com ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS FLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT 1VAS PREFAP.D BY ME OR UNDER MY DP.ECT AIP,RVISIUN ANJ IH.AI I AM hDULY LICENSED ARCH TECT Uhl LAWS OF THE StWito,A�OT LE /PE(.T Po LIP. 13669 eo to i✓iEv Phone (651) 681-0200 Fox (651) 681-0235 RjRyan Cons- truction, Inc. 110C Mendeto Haiahts Rd. Merdoto Heights. TIN 55120 2705 Willow Drive, Medina, Minnesota Co pyrighl 7007 LoomPrtl lc-nparl arch loci^., F.L. Project Designer BEN R. Drawn By. MJG, BJR Checked By. LL/LML Revisions 1 C.02.06 ISSUED 12.15.0E 01.02.07 OWNER REVISIONS REISSUED 01.18.0 7 CITY COMMENTS ELEVATIONS Sheet Number A3 SCALE: Vs` - 1'-0` Project No. 060602-1