Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout05-12-2009-P..)\D1 tc PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, MAY 12, 2009 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24) 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda 3. Update from City Council proceedings 4. Planning Department Report 5. Approval of April 14, 2009 Planning Commission minutes. 6. Public Hearing: Wranglers Restaurant — David Willis (PIDs 12-118- 23-41-0012, 12-118-23-41-0013 & 12-118-23-41-00014) — Preliminary Plat to combine two lots and Site Plan Review to construct a parking lot for a proposed restaurant/bar. 7. Adjourn POSTED IN CITY HALL MAY 8, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, Associate Planner DATE: May 8, 2009 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates for May 12, 2009 Commission Meeting Ordinance Updates A) CUP Standards for Religious Institutions — the ordinance was reviewed by the City Council, who directed staff to make a few changes and provide additional information on intensity regulations and parking requirements. The ordinance and rezoning ordinance are planned to be back on the Council agenda on June 2. B) Animal Unit Density Standards — staff will prepare amendments as directed by the City Council for the RR zoning district regulations. Staff intends to publish notice for a Public Hearing at the June Planning Commission meeting. C) Private Recreation Zoning District — the ordinance will be placed on a future agenda after the Council has acted on the Public/Semi-Public zoning ordinances. D) General Business and Industrial Ordinances — the ordinance will be placed on a future agenda following Council action on the PREC ordinance. Land Use Application Reviews A) Michael Anderson (and Wallace Anderson) Final Plat — 985 and 995 Medina Road — The City Council has approved this final plat, and staff is reviewing the septic design before signing and recording the plat. B) Woodridge Church — 1500 County Road 24 — the applicant has provided an extension that extends 60 days following the completion of the moratorium. They plan to be active in the discussion regarding the updated ordinance regulations. C) Wrangler's Restaurant — 32 Hamel Road — The applicant has submitted updated plans and staff is reviewing the application. Notice has been sent for a Public Hearing at the May 12 Planning Commission meeting. D) Holy Name Cemetery — The City Council directed staff to prepare resolutions approving the lot combination, CUP/Site Plan, and Interim Use Permit. The resolutions and the review of the easement vacation will be on the May 19 City Council agenda. Additional Proiects A) Comprehensive Plan Update — Staff has made the changes as directed by Council and has mailed the Update back to the Metropolitan Council for review. The Plan, as submitted, will be available on the City's website early next week as well. B) Code Enforcement — Staff has noted a significant clean-up of a property located in Independence Beach after staff made the owner aware of multiple nuisance violations. Planning Department Update Page 1 of 1 May 5, 2009 City Council Meeting Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Draft Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1. Call to Order: Commissioner Robin Reid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Planning Commissioners, Robin Reid, Michele Litts, Victoria Reid, Beth Nielsen, Jim Simons and Mary Verbick. Absent: Charles Nolan Also Present: City Administrator Chad Adams, Associate Planner Dusty Finke, and Planning Assistant Debra Peterson -Dufresne 2. Public Comments on Items not on the Agenda: No public comments. 3. Update from City Council Proceedings: Weir updated the Commission that the City Council: • Approved the four commercial ordinances; • Approved a civil defense siren installation agreement with Hennepin County for a siren to be placed on the Hennepin County Public Works site; • Approved a feasibility report for 2009 mill and overlay road projects for a section of Pioneer Trail, and the neighborhoods of Cherry Hills, Elm Creek Drive and Sycamore Trail, with costs to be partially assessed to benefiting properties; • Approved a Data Practices procedure that makes correspondence concerning Medina City matters to be available upon request. This procedure includes staff, Council, Planning and Park Commissions; • Reviewed a commercial business survey that will serve as a basis for our summer intern to research ways Medina can help to incentivize businesses to locate in Medina; • Administrator Chad Adams, Mayor Crosby, Liz Weir and Deb Peterson -Dufresne promoted to our representatives an extension of the five year -rule governing RIF Districts to July 2014, in order to allow the City to build more infrastructure in Uptown Hamel and to have it count as "in -district" expenses. Our bill will be included in the Omnibus Bill, but whether it survives multiple amendments to TIF requests is another matter; • Authorized staff to look at purchasing land for a future water tower; • Directed staff to look how to remedy the unfortunate placement of electrical boxes at the junction of Sioux Drive and Hamel Road in Uptown Hamel, which impede sight lines at the junction and detract from the general appeal of the streetscape; 1 Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes • Recognized Public Works Superintendent Steve Scherer for 15 years of service; • Made adjustments to the Comprehensive Plan, as required by Met Council. Our biggest issue is the restrictions the Met Council has placed on Conservation Developments in the Long-term Sewered Service Area, basically the MCWD, in the southern third of the City. The Met Council objective works directly against Medina's goal to preserve ecologically sensitive areas and the City's rural heart; • Agreed to limit master landscaping plan for Hamel Legion Park; • Reminded the Commission that Clean-up Day is April 25th at City Hall from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. All volunteers are welcome and it is a fun community day. • Endorsed Commissioner Simon's concept of including total capacity to regulate the intensity of use of institutions within RR districts. 4. Planning Department Report: Finke updated the Commission on upcoming projects and ordinances such: • Wranglers Restaurant in Uptown Hamel • Comprehensive Plan Ordinance Update • Annual Park Tour Invitation • Bird Watching Tour 5. Approval of March 10, 2009 Planning Commission Minutes: Motion by Litts, seconded by Verbick to approve the March 10, 2009 minutes with recommended changes. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Presentation: Low Impact Design — Julie Westerlund, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 7. Public Hearing: Holy Name Cemetery — (PIDs 24-118-23-14-0011 & 24-118-23-14- 0006) — Lot Combination, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, Interim Use Permit, and Easement Vacation to expand existing cemetery and construct a wooded pathway for cremation burials. Peterson -Dufresne presented the application to the Commission. The Church purchased the property to the east of the existing cemetery and proposes to combine the lots in order to expand onto this property. The applicant proposed 344 additional in -ground burial sites and 100 above- ground niches that will be placed along a proposed woodchip path in the wooded area on the lot. The wooded pathway would have above -ground stones and benches for cremation remains. Peterson -Dufresne stated that the Interim Use Permit arises in order to allow the single-family home to continue to be used on the same lot as the cemetery. She also stated that the home and in -ground burial location meet setback requirements of the ordinance. The woodchip path encroaches within the setback to the north, so staff has recommended as a condition of approval 2 Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes that no above -ground cremation niches be allowed in the setback area. Peterson -Dufresne stated that the septic tanks were inspected last fall and not found to be weather tight. A condition of approval has also been placed for correction or replacement of the septic tanks. She stated that five trees would potentially be impacted by the in -ground burials due to the dripline of the trees. Dan Garry, Parish Administrator, stated that the church purchased the single family home property 15 years ago from the Armstrong's. They have 50 existing in -ground sites remaining with approximately 20 burials per year. He said that they would like a decision on their application so that they know whether they can use the property for the cemetery. He explained the Phase II plan and how it will provide additional options for grieving family members in the future. He stated they are relatively flexible and wishes to please the area residents. Public Hearing is opened at 8:22 p.m. V. Reid asked Garry if the condition to limit the use of the single family home for a maximum of 15-years is a concern. Garry stated that 15 years is a fairly long time and he is not certain the church will utilize the home over the entire time. Weir stated she was concerned with the 74 black hills spruce trees since the tree ordinance encourages the use of multiple species of trees to ward off any diseases that could eliminate a large mass of trees in one area. Peterson -Dufresne stated that adding more than one tree type could be a condition of approval. V. Reid asked if notification was sent to surrounding neighbors. Peterson -Dufresne stated that mailings were sent out providing notice. Verbick raised concern with the potential increased internal roadway width for Phase II since it's a low impact project. She liked the recommendation staff placed on the project, which requires the roadway to be re-evaluated. She would like to not immediately increase the width of the roads. Peterson -Dufresne explained the Fire Marshal's concern for access that wouldn't necessarily be fire related. She would also like the evaluation to be done mindfully and not go overboard, so not to compromise some of our commitments to water quality. Neilson asked why staff is recommending the road widening wait until Phase II. She asked if it was because of the limited amount of use. Peterson -Dufresne concurred. Neilson also inquired as to why vehicles are parked along the cemetery road on Sundays, which appears to be for church service or overflow. Brian O'Brien, the cemetery volunteer, stated that parking in the cemetery usually only occurs on Christmas and Easter. Neilson further stated she sees parking there on most Sundays and O'Brien explained that the people parking there are attending the church service and the cemetery to visit their loved ones. V. Reid asked if the wetland delineation was for one of the lots or for both lots. Peterson - Dufresne clarified the wetland delineation was for both lots. She further explained that the delineation couldn't start until after May 1, 2009. 3 Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing closed at 8:29 p.m. Simons said he supports the condition requiring replacement of trees if more than 15 percent of significant trees do not survive the construction of Phase I. He further stated the proposal was well prepared, complete, and supported moving forward with a motion of approval. Peterson -Dufresne suggested adding a condition requiring diversification of trees rather than all of the 74 trees being black hills spruce. The Commission supported the added condition. Motion by Simons, Seconded by Verbick to recommend approval of the CUP, IUP, and Site Plan review with two additional conditions noted by the Commission (absent Nolan). 8. Public Hearing: Ordinance Amendment — Chapter 8, Sections 825 and 826 of the Citv's Code — Regulations related to the Public/Semi-Public zoning district and other regulations related to institutional land uses such as municipal buildings and religious institutions. Finke presented the ordinance amendment explaining how the City got where it is currently with the growth of City Hall and Churches within the RR zoning districts. He explained the moratorium to the Commission in how it allows the City time to research what direction it should go with institutional uses. It helps create a new district for institutional uses in the rural area; also removes the uses in the RR districts. Other changes to be made during the ordinance update would include allowing institutional uses in sewered residential areas. Finke further explained that the City has to look at both the 2000-2020 and 2020-2030 Comprehensive Plan objectives. He explained what uses would be permitted, conditional, accessory and prohibited within the new RPS District. He pointed out with direction of PC and CC that schools would be prohibited in the district since the Commission and Council felt that a sewered area would be more appropriate. Finke explained the recommended and existing lot standards for City Hall, Woodridge Church and First Apostolic Church. A comparison of Lake Elmo was also provided for comparison. Finke explained building design regulations related to size (maximum building size of 50,000 square feet total floor area and 35,000 square feet maximum building footprint), height, exterior building materials, and multi -sided architecture was explained as directed by the Commission last month. Finke explained landscaping and screening, highlighting the use of LID practices, tree planting and tree preservation. He recommended the Commission discuss the tree planting recommendation. Finke recommended outdoor lighting to have zero foot-candles 25 feet from the property line, which would require the applicant to take active steps in reducing light impacts. Mechanical equipment and trash enclosures were also noted with City Hall not being in compliance. 4 Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes Finke reviewed standards for religious institutions: • Access to arterial roadways would be required • Sanctuary seating capacity would be limited to 500 persons • Existing facilities would conform without an ability to substantially expand • A maximum of 500 persons on site to be allowed at one time, with the exception of four larger events allowed per year He further explained similar regulations for City Hall as adopted for religious institutions such as occupancy. The Commission also discussed daycare/early childhood education as an accessory use and how they relate to the principal use. The Commission concluded that daycares/early childhood education would have size restrictions. Verbick asked if there was a place in the City we could use LID practices. Finke said it could be placed within the purpose statement so if opportunities arise it would be in the ordinance. Simons stated the proposed changes seem to avoid nonconformity. He asked if staff had examples of instances where nonconformities were avoided purposefully. Finke said the lot size standards and parking setbacks were examples. He further explained building materials would bring many buildings out of compliance. Simons asked staff concerning occupancy load information. Finke explained the largest church has 930 max people. Public Hearing opened @ 9:14 p.m. Carol Busch, 2175 Hollybush Road, has been a resident for 17 years and has been attending Woodridge Church for about 10 years. She explained that experiences at the church have enriched their lives. The addition that the church proposes fills an empty area at the rear of the building and should not have an impact to surrounding properties. She feels the church is an asset to the City. R. Reid explained to the public that the item is not to talk about a specific church. Steve Hoffer, staff member @ Woodridge Church, resides in City of Plymouth and has issues that were raised at the last Planning Commission meeting. He considers himself a resident even though he doesn't live in Medina. He explained that he met with neighbors near Woodridge Church to try and resolve concerns related to traffic, existing entrance (the entrance location was not their choice), hard -surface run-off, and quality of water, exterior lighting. He feels the Commission has done an excellent job, with the exception that the number of persons proposed to be allowed to exceed 500 people. He said Woodridge Church exceeds the 500 people maximum. He explained they are in the City of Medina and want to be respectful of the community. They do not have plans or designs that create them to be a mega church. 5 Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes R. Reid asked if the ordinance allowed them to expand to twice the size of the sanctuary as it is today, would it work for Woodridge Church. Steve said possibly, but it would depend on what would be allowed with the other square footage. Nielsen asked if a church has larger events would they need additional parking. Hopper said they have been fine with existing parking. Simons commented on the threshold related to size of churches. He further explained that some sort of stipulation is necessary. Hopper explained that the City should base it on the building and fire codes that are already in place. Peter Slocum, 1752 Co. Rd 24, asked if nonconforming vacant lots could be developed in the RPS district for institutional uses and if they needed to have five acres of suitable soils. He has issues with lighting; and wonders if the number of lights the church is using could be reduced if the church doesn't need all of them in use. He also likes the screening code. Finally, he does not like the 50,000 square foot allowance and prefers 40,000 square feet, since a lot of the churches could double in size; and he doesn't feel it's appropriate in the rural residential district. Ann Kuntz of Station 19 Architects, project manager, said church planning is their focus and they work all over the country. She said churches almost without exception have multiple uses going on at the same time, which make it rather arbitrary to use a multiplier. She said the IBC regulation is already being handled. She feels the City is taking on an area that is already being handled through the building code and placing it into zoning ordinance. She feels most regulations recommended can be met by most churches, with the exception of number of occupants. She recently finished a church with 2500 occupants and it was a 50,000 square foot building. She said she is all for sustainability. Lastly, the number of persons is the sticking point in the ordinance. Martha VandeVen, 1765 Medina Road, said she has a concern with intensity of institutional uses. She would like the use to conform to the surroundings. She counted traffic on the Sunday prior to Easter and counted 415 vehicles with two services. Her concern is if the facility was expanded it would be more people going to the site, which would result in traffic problems. Woodridge's web -site has thirty-four adult discussion groups that meet off -site. If those groups came to the church after it expanded, it would mean more traffic. She used an example of Wooddale Church in Eden Prairie, which has a large number of services. She still has a concern with septic and run-off and encouraged the Commission and staff to look at it further. Alan Wondra, 2045 Tamarack Drive, said he lives in a home approximately 2000 square feet in size. He gave an example of his home size in relationship to a 50,000 square foot building and felt it is way too intense for a rural area, especially if it's on private sewer. He likes the idea of having wastewater calculations to measure the intensity of use. The number of seats in the sanctuary isn't the best way to come up with the maximum size or capacity. Bruce Quam, an attendee at Woodridge Church who lives in Minnetrisa, said they can adjust lighting and the sanctuary is not being proposed to expand. He said the septic system would be expanded and water run-off has improved with the holding ponds captured. He added that 6 Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes the church is also in compliance with parking. Simons asked about the agricultural field comparison, and Quam explained they have a pond. Cal Peterson, representative of First Apostolic Church, built in 2003, said they have a very low level of activity with bible classes on Wednesday night and two services on Sunday. His main concern is the sanctuary size. They do not have classrooms and all activities are done in the sanctuary. He feels the church would be impacted by the maximum 500 sanctuary seats. He is also asking for relief on the exterior building materials, since the church has vinyl siding. Simons asked for specific roadway standards for religious institutions. Finke explained roadway classifications. Verbick was interested in any staff response to citizen comments and concerns. Finke explained the rational for the 50,000 square foot building maximum and the sanctuary size. He further explained the City has a number of structures in the RR lots that are in the 20,000 square foot range. R. Reid asked about church steeples and how they are measured. Finke explained that the City does allow exceptions and further explained how to measure building height. Simons recommends to not guide institutional uses along minor arterial roadways. He prefers arterial roadways. Finke summarized opinion. R. Reid concurred with Simons opinion. R. Reid asked if something could be done with the time lights should be turned off. Finke explained that turning lights off at 10:00 pm would mean the current City hall lights would be out of compliance tonight, but could be looked at as a condition of approval. Simons asked about screening and blocking the view of single family homes. Finke said that he could add language referencing topography. Simons discussed intensity of use regulation options. V. Reid raised concern that the proposal brings Woodridge Church out of compliance. Simons asked if traffic control could be regulated with an application. Finke provided an example at one of the City's golf courses. Verbick felt the multiplier option is contradictory and the building/fire code has a built in regulation. Parking was also discussed. R. Reid asked if anyone had an issue with 500 sanctuary seating. Finke stated that First Apostolic Church had a concern and he would contact them. The Commission appeared to be in consensus that square footage is better to regulate than the number of people (occupancy). Simons pointed out that he is alright with something smaller than 50,000 square feet. This is an activity that we're guiding out. Allowing a church to expand is a concern to him. 7 Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes Nielsen felt that the regulation should start with the footprint size. The Commission discussed intensity. Simons felt the Commission should look at maximum square footage. Finke explained there are other ways to break up massing. He said it's the floor area. V. Reid asked if Medina has buildings of 50,000 square feet of floor area. Finke explained the intensity of use is very different from an institutional use. Ann Kuntz of Station 19 Architects, project manager, stated if the City regulated the total number of people at one time, Woodridge Church would exceed the proposed regulation, which would mean they could not add onto the building based on number of people. Finke clarified that the church would have to make other shifts in services and times to provide all the activities they may want to offer so that they wouldn't exceed the maximum occupancy. He explained there are a number of properties with more than 50,000 square feet of floor area in the RR district. The Commission concluded that they agree on the following: • Arterial roadways are appropriate • Floor area should be a maximum of 45,000 square feet • Sanctuary seating to be a maximum of 500 seats Simons said he prefers, if using a ratio, it be 2-2.5 or 45,000 square feet if it's floor area. He prefers something lesser if possible. Adams raised concern that the Commission was comfortable with allowing the existing churches to expand. Public Hearing closed at 11:03 p.m. Motion by Verbick, seconded by V. Reid to approve the Ordinance with recommended changes to arterial roadways, reducing the footprint to 45,000 square feet, utilizing a multiplier closer to 2.5, adding LID language, and researching renting of church buildings. Motion carried unanimously (absent Nolan). 9. Public Hearing: Zoning Map Amendment — Rezone the following parcels to Rural Public/Semi-Public: a. PID#22-118-23-24-0004 — 2052 County Road 24 (Medina City Hall) b. PID#23-118-23-23-0001 —1500 County Road 24 (Woodridge Church) c. PID#27-118-23-23-0008 — 2300 Cox Trail (First Apostolic Lutheran Church) Finke presented the application. Public hearing opened at 11:05 p.m. No public comment 8 Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes Public hearing closed at 11:07 p.m. Motion by V. Reid, seconded by Verbick to approve the rezoning and map amendment. Motion carried unanimously (absent Nolan). 9. Adjourn: Motion by Verbick, seconded by Simons to adjourn at 11:09 p.m. Motion carried unanimously (absent Nolan). 9 A MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, Associate Planner DATE: May 6, 2009 MEETING: May 12, 2009 Planning Commission SUBJ: Wranglers Bar and Restaurant — Preliminary/Final Plat; Site Plan Review 32 Hamel Road (PIDs 12-118-23-41-0012, 12-118-23-41-0014, 12-118-23-41-0013) Summary David and Jim Willis (dba DW Holding Inc.) have applied for approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat as well as a Site Plan Review for the property referenced above. The applicants intend to operate a bar and restaurant in the existing building at 32 Hamel Road, previously occupied by the Provenance art/antique store (see location map below). In order to provide parking for the use, and also to add mechanical/cooler equipment and a trash enclosure, the applicant proposes to combine the 32 Hamel Road parcel with two surrounding parcels. The Uptown Hamel district requires a Site Plan Review for an expansion of parking lot of this size. The ordinance also requires a Site Plan Review for a change in the use of the property to a more intensive use. The applicant has not proposed to alter the existing structure to the point which would require a formal land use approval of the building. Instead, the Site Plan Review relates to the parking lot and the expansion of equipment for the more intensive use. Staff recommends approval of both requests, with the recommended conditions at the end of this staff report. Review Deadline Original Application Received: December 15, 2008 Complete Application Received: April 29, 2009 60-day Review Deadline (Site Plan): June 28, 2009 120-day Review Deadline (Plat): August 27, 2009 Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 1 of 9 Plat and Site Plan Review May 12, 2009 Planning Commission Meeting A Preliminary and Final Plat The applicant proposes to combine the three existing parcels into one lot (see below). The existing lots are 0.08, 0.23, and 0.38 acres in size, for a total area of 29,960 square feet (0.688 acre). The City has supported the combination of small lots in the Uptown Hamel area, where possible, because of the increased difficulty of redeveloping small sites. The properties are all zoned Uptown Hamel, and are guided Uptown Hamel in the 2000-2020 Comprehensive Plan. The City's draft 2010-2030 Comp Plan update identifies the parcels as Mixed Use -Business. Within the Uptown Hamel concept plan, the two larger lots are identified for a future high -density residential use. The Mixed Use -Business land use, after the 2010-2030 Comp Plan is approved, also has a high priority for residential development. Staff notes that combining these lots with the commercial use may reduce the opportunity to achieve residential development. However, the lot combination leaves approximately half of the property vacant. The applicant has identified this area for future development or expansion. Under the current UH zoning, staff would strongly recommend a residential component with that future development. Depending on future rezoning to either Uptown Hame1-1 or Uptown Hame1-2, residential development may be required with future development. The only structure is located on the smallest lot (32 Hamel Road), and is 1900 square feet in size. There are two existing curb cut accesses to Hamel Road, one on the western side of the western lot, and the other in the "tail" of the rear lot. LEGEND Lot Lines for Proposed Lot Lot Lines proposed to be removed �_007 Pictome tional Corp. Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Plat and Site Plan Review Page 2 of 9 May 12, 2009 Planning Commission Meeting Ordinance Compliance The properties are currently zoned Uptown Hamel (UH). The table below summarizes the required lot standards for the district (Section 834) and what is proposed for the combined lot. Uptown Hamel Requirement Proposed Lot Lot Size No Minimum 29,960 square feet Lot Width No Minimum , 155 feet Minimum Front Setback None 11.9 feet Maximum Front Setback 10 feet 11.9 feet Minimum Side Setbacks None (if no doors or windows) 8 feet (if openings) 0.51 feet (east, no doors) 96 feet (west, with door) Minimum Rear Setback 12 feet 166 feet Maximum Impervious Surface 90% 13.8% (as existing today) The lot created as a result of the proposed combination meets the lot standards of the UH district, with the exception of the maximum front setback regulation. The structure already exists in the location today, and the applicant is not proposing an action which will increase the non- conformity of the building. In fact, staff is recommending that the applicant dedicate a 10-foot drainage and utility easement across the front of the lot. After this dedication, the building would be only 1.9 feet from the easement line but still 11.9 feet from the front property line. The City established a maximum front setback in Uptown Hamel in order to implement the vision of a pedestrian friendly, mixed use town center. New buildings are required to abide by the maximum setback requirement in order to achieve this goal. Since the applicant is not proposing to increase the non -conformity, and because staff is recommending dedication of easements, staff recommends approval of the lot combination. Wetlands/Floodplains/Easements The three properties do not have any wetland areas, and are not within a floodplain. Staff is recommending standard drainage and utility easements that are common practice with plats; 10 feet along right-of-way and 5 feet along interior lot lines. Because of the proximity of the existing building to the east property line, staff does not recommend easements in this area. Right-of-wav and Access The City has 66-feet of right-of-way dedicated in front of the subject lots, and the City Engineer is not recommending additional dedication. The recent Hamel Road reconstruction utilized the existing right-of-way. The lot, if combined, has frontage on Hamel Road, and the particular access point would be reviewed as part of a site plan. Criteria for Reviewing Plats According to Section 820.21 of the City Code, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat based on one or a combination of the following findings: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city. As noted above, staff believes the lot combination is consistent with the City s policy that smaller lots in the Uptown Hamel area be combined when possible. Staff has noted that Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 3 of 9 May 12, 2009 Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting the existing building exceeds the maximum front yard setback. However, because the non- conformity is not proposed to increase, staff recommends approval of the combination. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. Staff believes the combination does not raise concerns in these areas: (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. As noted above, staff believes the lot combination meets ordinance standards, with- the exception of the front setback exceeding the 10 foot maximum. Because the non -conformity is not proposed to increase, staff recommends approval of the combination. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. Staff does not believe the combination will cause environmental concerns. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. Staff does not believe the combination will cause health concerns. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. Staff does not believe the combination will conflict, with the condition that drainage and utility easements be provided. Site Plan Review The Uptown Hamel zoning ordinance requires a Site Plan Review in this situation because of the following factors: 1) proposed change in use to a more intensive use -in this case from retail to bar/restaurant; 2) increase in parking of more than 4 spaces; and 3) change in topography. The purpose of a Site Plan Review is "to determine whether it is consistent with the requirements of this ordinance, including the applicable development standards and the purpose of the zoning district in which the property is located. Following the review, the planning commission shall recommend that the site plan be approved, approved with conditions or denied." Proposed Use • The applicant proposes a bar and restaurant, which are both permitted uses in the UH zoning district. The applicant will need to stay current with liquor licensing requirements, which staff has noted as a recommended condition. No outdoor seating area is proposed at this time. The UH zoning district allows an area no more than 200 square feet in size. Staff has recommended some conditions to regulate this potential use should it ever arise. As discussed above in relation to the plat, staff has noted that the concept plan in the existing UH ordinance identifies two of the lots which are proposed to be combined as a future High Density housing. Future new construction may be required to include a residential component, Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 4 of 9 May 12, 2009 Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting depending on the zoning district regulations in place at that time. Staff recommends that this fact be recognized in the resolution for Site Plan approval, so that the information is available for all interested parties. Site Plan The proposed site plan is below, and full plans are attached. A parking lot is proposed behind the existing structure, with a driveway accessing off of Hamel Road. The western half of the lot is proposed to be vacant. This area is meant to either sell off for another building site (after it is re -subdivided), or the applicants may expand their building in the future. Lot/Setback and Building Size Requirements Following is a summary of the requirements of the UH district and what is proposed on the site plan. The applicant does not propose to alter the existing structure, so the circumstances are not Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 5 of 9 Plat and Site Plan Review May 12, 2009 Planning Commission Meeting proposed to change. Staff has also noted the setbacks for the proposed enclosure for mechanical equipment and garbage. Uptown Hamel Requirement Existing Structure Proposed Enclosure Minimum Front Setback None 11.9 feet N/A Maximum Front Setback 10 feet ' "., �� N/A Minimum Side Setback None 8 feet if window/door East - 0.51 feet (no doors) West - 96 feet (w/ door) East - 39 feet West - 94 feet Minimum Rear Setback 12 feet 166 feet 141 feet Maximum Building Size 20,000 square feet 1,900 square feet N/A Max. Impervious Surface 90% 39.2% (parcel) 39.2% (parcel) As discussed above in relation to the plat, the existing building exceeds the maximum front setback. The applicant is not proposing to increase this non -conformity, so staff recommends approval of the Site Plan Review, while recognizing the non -conformity. Building Design Standards The existing structure, because the exterior is not proposed to be significantly altered, is not part of this Site Plan Review. Staff wished to note that generally, the structure is consistent with the requirements of the UH district. The exterior building material is fiber cement siding (hardi board). While this is not listed as a permitted exterior material, it is high quality and durable. The ordinance requires a porch or overhang a minimum of six feet in width. The building has an overhang on the front which is less then 6 feet in width as required by the UH district, yet does go towards the architectural design elements sought by the ordinance. Landscaping The UH district requires at least 5% of the site to be plaza or landscaped. Landscaping shall consist of a combination of decorative deciduous and coniferous trees, shrubs, flowers, ground covers and rain gardens. The Tree Preservation ordinance applies to the application. The applicant proposes to remove two trees, which is allowed in the ordinance. The proposed landscaping is limited. The applicant proposes to plant three overstory Hackberry trees and a decorative Serviceberry. The site currently has 12 existing shrubs in the front of the building. The UH ordinance does not require a specific number of trees or shrubs. The commercial ordinance recently adopted by the City requires one tree per 50 feet of site perimeter and one shrub per 30 feet. If the property was zoned commercial, approximately 12 trees and 20 shrubs would be required. Staff recognizes that UH property is significantly different from the commercial districts, so the same requirements should not be used. Nonetheless, staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider additional plantings, especially adjacent to the parking lot. Staff does not recommend requiring significant landscaping on the western half of the property, because it would have to be removed when that portion of the lot is developed. Parking/Circulation/Loading The applicant proposes 12 parking stalls behind the existing building. The bar and restaurant is proposed to have 35 seats, and the parking ordinance requires 12 parking stalls. Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 6 of 9 May 12, 2009 Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting The UH district does not include a minimum parking setback. However, if the City requires a 5- foot drainage and utility easement along the eastern property line, staff recommends that the parking lot be setback at least this distance. The UH ordinance disallows parking in front of a building, and the proposed site plan is consistent with this requirement. The UH ordinance requires 3% (in this case, 165 square feet) of the parking lot area to be landscaped. Currently, no landscaping is proposed in the parking lot. Since there is only one row of parking, and because staff believes the parking lot will likely be expanded to the west when future construction occurs, staff believes there will more opportunity to provide landscaping when the parking lot is expanded. For that reason, staff is recommending a condition requiring landscaping in the parking lot when it is further expanded. In terms of pedestrian circulation, the building is proposed to have an entrance/exit on both the front and rear of the building. Without the rear door, staff would have recommended a sidewalk to circulate customers from the parking lot to the front of the building. Staff believes the loading capabilities of the site are a concern. A delivery truck or garbage truck would not be able to turn around in the rear of the building, and would block a number of the parking stalls during service. The applicant has stated that Randy's sanitation reviewed the site plan and did not raise concerns and that food and liquor deliveries would be outside of business hours and could be accommodated in the driveway and parking lot. The UH district does not require loading docks, because of the constraints on the property in the district. However, staff recommends a condition that loading and deliveries not impact traffic on Hamel Road. Site Drainne/Stormwater/Grading The property was part of the Uptown Hamel stormwater improvements. The site was designed to contain most of the run-off over the parking lot and into a stormwater pipe on the north side of the property. From there, the water is piped to the pond in Stormwater Nature Area. Engineering noted the north end of the parking lot should be re -designed to ensure positive drainage. Approximately 350 cubic yards of dirt is proposed to be removed from the site in order to grade the site, and an addition 300 cubic yards of sub -grade for the parking lot. Utilities Public Works and Engineering reviewed the proposed utility plan and provided comments, which are added as a condition of approval. The applicant will run a new water service to the building for a fire sprinkling system. The applicant will be required to pay necessary sewer and water connection fees as described by the fee schedule for this intensity of use. Lighting The applicant proposes two fixtures to light the parking lot. One fixture is proposed in the middle of the parking lot on a 12 foot pole. The second fixture is proposed near the rear building entrance/exit. The lighting ordinance (Section 829) allows a maximum of 0.8 Foot Candle (FC) of light at the property line, and 0.2 FC after the business closes. Staff has recommended a condition that specific photometric details be provided in order to ensure compliance with the lighting ordinance. Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 7 of 9 May 12, 2009 Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting Recclin2 and Trash Facilities; Mechanical Equipment The UH district requires that all facilities for recycling and trash be kept inside the principal buildings or within a completely screened area. If a completely screened area is used it must 1) be architecturally compatible with and made of the same or better material used on the principal building, and 2) meet the architectural and development standards of the district. The applicant has proposed an enclosure adjacent to the building for the mechanical equipment, and the bar cooler. The applicant has also proposed a fence to screen the trash/recycling facilities. The enclosure walls are proposed to be eight feet tall, with hardiboard siding, consistent with the existing building. The applicant has proposed wrought iron gates for the mechanical/cooler enclosure (facing east). The trash and recycling screening fence is proposed to be six feet in height, constructed of cedar with.a cedar gate (facing north). Staff recommends a wall with hardiboard siding for screening the trash and recycling area instead of a cedar fence. This is more compatible with the building, and is more durable with less maintenance. Staff would support the use of a cedar gate. Staff also recommends the following conditions: 1) the trash enclosure shall be large enough for both trash and recycling containers, and 2) the enclosures shall be tall enough to screen all dumpsters and equipment. Low Impact Development The proposed site plan does not include low impact development (LID) best management practices. As noted above, the proposal utilizes the stormwater improvements in the area, which the property was assessed for in 2006. Staff has noted that the parking lot could be designed in a way to direct run-off to the west and then through a vegetative swale before heading into the stormwater pipe as an LID practice. However, because staff believes this site will change when the western half develops, it may be more effective to implement LID practices upon future development, which will be able to reduce the impact of that additional hardcover as well. Staff Recommendation The Planning Commission will need to hold a Public Hearing, which was published in the City's newspaper and sent to neighbors within 350 feet. Staff recommends approval of the Plat and Site Plan Review with the following conditions: Preliminary and Final Plat 1. The plat shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements adjacent to the north and south property lines, and 5-foot easements adjacent to the east and west property lines. No easements shall be required for the south 40 feet of the eastern property line; 2. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the City Attorney with regards to title documentation; 3. The final plat shall be filed with Hennepin County Recorder within 120 days of the date of the city council resolution granting final approval or the final plat shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Applicant and approved by the city council; and Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 8 of 9 May 12, 2009 Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting 4. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary and final plat and related documents. Site Plan Review 1. This Site Plan Review approval shall be subject to the recording of the Plat of Hamel Commons; 2. The Applicant acknowledges that City ordinances have identified a residential use for portions of the property and that future new construction or development may be required to provide residential units, consistent with the ordinance requirements in place at the time of such construction or development; 3. The Applicant shall provide additional landscaping, especially adjacent to proposed parking lot and also to screen the equipment and trash enclosure; 4. Proposed trees and shrubs shall be diverse, with no more than 25% of a single species; 5. In the event the parking lot is expanded in the future, landscaping shall be required within the parking lot, consistent with the requirements of the City Code; 6. The parking lot shall be set back a minimum of five feet from the eastern property line, and located outside of any drainage and utility easements; 7. The Applicant shall be responsible to ensure that loading, deliveries, and garbage services do not impact traffic on Hamel Road. In the event the City determines that traffic is impacted, the Applicant shall be required to construct necessary loading areas; 8. The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the City Engineer review letter dated April 24, 2009; 9. The Applicant shall submit photometric details for the proposed lighting which shall be in compliance with the requirements of the lighting ordinance; 10. Sufficient area shall be provided in the trash enclosure to contain both trash and recycling containers; 11. The east and west walls of the trash/recycling enclosure shall be constructed with hardiboard siding, consistent with the existing structure; 12. The proposed enclosure shall be of sufficient height to fully screen the dumpsters in trash/recycling area, the mechanical equipment, the bar cooler; 13. The Applicant shall obtain written approval from adjacent property owners and from the railroad in order to complete the proposed improvements which extend off of the Property; 14. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed District; and 15. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the Site Plan Review. Attachments 1. City Engineer review letter dated April 24, 2009 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Wrangler's Menu 4. Photos of the exterior of the existing building 5. Preliminary Plat and. Civil Site Plan received April 14, 2009 6. Final Plat received April 14, 2009 7. Architectural Plans received April 29, 2009 Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 9 of 9 May 12, 2009 Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting 2335Highway 36w St. Paul, mmssu3 nge1*a6-4600 nmss1'm6-1szz rwmmmestmp.com �������� n� roo Mr. Dusty Finke Associate Planner City ofMedina 2O53County Road 24 Medina, p4N5GJ4O-Q79O Re: 32Mamel Road —Wrangfers Restaurant City ofMedina Dear Dusty, KVehave reviewed the plans for the proposed site revisions for arestaurant located at 32 Medina Road. We have the following comments with regards toengineering matters, ° The plat does not show o proposed drainage and utility easement along the east property line adjacent to the existing building. Normally,� the [dx would require easements along all lot lines. Hmxever,inthis case, the building lies less than 1'fronn the property line, soaneasement may not berequired. * All proposed easements should be shown on the Preliminary Plat (Sheet C3.01). ° All parking stalls should be2Q'deep. p The applicant should note that as part of the Hamel Road reconstruct project, a S' wide paver sidewalk will beinstalled along the length nfthe property, The walk will be sloped at 2% towards the street and be placed at the back of the curb east of the existing driveway and behind a5'boulevard west ofthe existing driveway. * Grading is shown on the property to the east and north. Proof mfthe ability to complete this work, such 8yawritten agreement with the adjacent property owners, should besubmitted bothe City, " It does not appear that the northernmost area of the parking lots will drain well to the proposed catch basin. The applicant should consider installing another catch basin at the northwest corner ofthe parking lot, " The proposed storm sewer lies partially onrailroad hgh . The applicant should meet all railroad requirements A'e. permits, etc.\for this work, and copies should be submitted tothe City prior hoapproval. ° The proposed pavement section should match that recommended in the geotechnical report. * Public Works should review the proposed utility service connection locations. ° The proposed curb and gutter should terminate at the north edge of the City sidewalk and not extend through the driveway apron. The existing surmountable curb should bemaintained across the driveway entrance. Ifyou have any questions please feel free hocontact nneat/6S1l8O4-4894. Sincerely, BONESIROO Darren Amundsen Cc: Tom Kellogg Wranglers April 8, 2009 City of Medina Dear Council Members: Wrangler's is looking to get approved to open a new restaurant/bar in the Uptown Hamel area in the old Providence Antique Shop. We have purchased that property the one directly behind and the property to the west. We are asking the City to let us join these three pieces of property together so we can add a parking lot, beer cooler, new mechanical and dumpster area. The new restaurant will be a medium priced facility seating approx 35 specialized in serving high quality food and beverages (we have attached a copy of the menu for your viewing). We will also be offering entertainment such as pool tables, video games, pull tabs, live music, DJ and karaoke. The theme of the restaurant will be western in nature as we are hoping to fit into the surrounding old town Hamel atmosphere. We our committed to making this a fun and enjoyable place that anyone can come into and have a good meal and a good time. in closing we are excited about bringing a new business to the area and looking forward to a long a prosperous relationship with the City and the surrounding communities. Sincerely, David Willis and James Willis Owner/Proprietors Appaflzarg tefaveers frasof eti! franeA Atlas 1/2 &Wet feel sappy 6f/ra,feers fresh etif adon Rings l fresd ad orlon and Band dipped Jn Beer Balla') 1/2 6asgat fweeBaslst Warngeers lUJngs year diold, $affaBet, earBeeae, Jamadian of POaln MozzaretVa Sllx Waaeye fingers SampBer POaffai !Wings, Mx Abrgars and Union Rings Saftdwlclag ffof ffam and edaase PofJBBy edease Slea4 1/206' glover ewada file way you 0* if Addlllokal toppings eilooss Baeem lstbiaw d lomat a do& ffof Dago Sandwleol Topped wild Pappars and M frasd Jfaelan &visage Petrol Tenderteobt SandwlcA' N/aBBaya sandalled Meows fried edldflen Donna, 1/# eAlx 1/2 elf& 10anggers goof TandeMoln &las'appad wild oar Aasr/oks Pepparrorn Saada Amigo 8ear gaff rrad Srlrlrryp Hand 8affered WaiVoya Pula /Wets Plalfer edkeen and MO,* Almelo PBalfar 5.....`.dsx...._. Engineering • Planning • Surveying Site Deve for IS Medina5 Minn sota Presented oyo Dk Hoding G. VICINITY MAP NO SCALE DEVELOPER/OWNER CIVIL ENGINEER DW HOLDING INC. MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES 5515 GLACIER LANE N. 14800 28TH AVENUE, SUITE 140 PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 TEL: 763-923-4878 TEL 763-476-6010 CONTACT: J131 WILLIS FAX 763-476-0532 CONTACT: GAVE NASH SURVEYOR MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES 14000 28TH AVENUE, SUITE 140 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 TEL 763-476-6010 FAX 763-476-6532 CONTACT: HENRY NELSON SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION C1.01 TITLE SHEET C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C3.01 PRELIMINARY MAT C4.01 SITE PLAN Cent GRADING PIAN C6.61 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C6.02 EROSION CONTROL NOTES C7.01 III1L1TY PLAN DETAILS C9.01 LIGHTING d LANDSCAPING PLAN MFRA McCombs Frank Root Associates, Inc 148C0MArI: ureNorth, SLAB 141 Pymoul • Unnasva • 5544, phone: 763/476-6010 • fdtc 763/476-853. webs/kr: www.mfm.con Client DW HOLDING, INC. Project WRANGLERS RESTAURANT Location MEDINA, MN. Certifications I hereby certify that this plan, speciAcalion or report was prepared by me or under my cited supervisor and Mat I am a duly Licensed Professional ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. bomicilivak David J. Nash Registration No. 21836 Date: 04/14/21309 II applicable, carnal us fora wel signed Copy a Ws plan each Is asalable upon eeeuest at McCombs Frank Roos p�+trs, Inc, PlymoNq AlNgeca Summary Designed: DJN Approved: DJN Phase: FINAL Drawn: DJD Book/ Page: Initial Issue: 04/142001 Revision History No. Dale By Submittal/Revision Sheet Title TITLE SHEET Sheet Number Revisio C1.01 Project No. DWH1813' Engineering • Planning • Surveying x 1023.8 5 x 1026.5 /x 1026`3 x x 1026.30 0, x 1027.1 1027.6- N27P x 10363' x 1028.8 x 1029.8 x 1029.0 x 1029.2 x 1027.0 x 1026.4 x 1024.5 x 1026. THE SUBSURFACE UTILRY NFORMADON SHOWN ON THESE PLANSS A UTILETY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES DE CMSCE 36-02. TRLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF TASTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.. THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION DF ALL MISTING OLDIES BEFORE COMMENCING WOPJL BY CONTACIWG THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MIFBIESOTM. THE CONTRACTOR ANDIOB SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FILLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AIM ALL DAMAGES. WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL MUTES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). A£1021 SI F INNo.13 x 1028. --PROTECT STREET UGHT ---,6`1019.8 1024.7 Z t� ,26 elB �` 0reaq290 Q x 101.86, \ x 1025.3 Ai• EMOVE SPRUCE` x was EMOVE DEAD SPRUCEL__ O 35'wW OUTDOOR -FRP,. MAP .9 oJa. 'r x 1027.9 3.1 \� `-A` x 1022.2 1021.9 RGi013 IGT011. \F0� 1ID 1027.8 0 / 42. LEGEND PROPOSED • EDSTING CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER O LY •^••^^^^•® SANITARYSEWER->SKN-•O FORCEMAIN (SAN.) 0-> FFI>-Q Q--”"--- ) WATERMAN ►i I -$' ^ I C EASEMENT DRAINTILE -»DTI» GAS UNE UD ML ELECTRIC tic LTT TELEPHONE UT E"t SPOT ELEVATION 95X 5 96125 CONTOUR f02-------A02------ GRADING NOTES A PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO MESHED SURFACE ELEVATION. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPOSED CURB DENOTE GUTTER GRADE B. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT1E SUBSURFACE MIME WFORMAT10NSHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A DENNY DUALITY LEVEL O. THIS MALTY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF WASCE 38.021M ED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEMOTION OF OEM SUBSURFACE WREN DATA.. THE CONTRACTOR MOTOR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETER /11F THE MGT LOCATION OfALL DUSTSNG minas BEFORE COMMENCING WORN BY CONTACTING PE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINEDRA AT 14510.252.1185T. THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSMLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MGM BE OCCASIONED BYRD OR HER FAILURE TO EMMY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANVAND ALL UTILITIES UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). T SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL MISTING MURES WHICH CONFLICT Mm THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PUNS. C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES BURINS THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF MIS PROJECT. THE CONRNCTORWRL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OEM PROJECT. D. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: N ACCORDANCE WM1 GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTOR PRACTICER. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMMONS ON THEN/5 SITE MUMS SAFETY OF ALL PDISON5 AND PROPERTY DURG PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK THE REQUIREMENT WEL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOM E UNITED TO NORMAL WORIUNG HOURS THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE S NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW TITRE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE E THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETETHE SINE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WIIHT:HE REQUDEMENFS OF THE DMUS _ SOILS ENGINEER ALL SOIL TESTING MULL BE COMPLETED MINE OWNERS S0ES ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CDORONATWG ALL /TOURED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. F. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BAST A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED MIRE STREET AND PARKA'S AREA SUGRADE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEMAXTE TRUCK WITH AGROSS WEIGHT Of25 TONS. THE TEST ROUSTS SHALL BE AT THE DWECTION TITHE SOBS ENGINEER THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET DR PARTING AREA ARE UNSTABLE CORRECTIONS TI THE SUBGRAOE SOBS SHALL BE COMPLETED INACCORDANCE MTH THE REOUIREMEMS UTNE SOILS ENGINEER G. THE CONTACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARWCADES, WINNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, RAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE IAMNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. M. THE TREES ANTI OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND/OR ADJACENT TOME PROJECT ARE OFMK COiCERNTD THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS AND SHALL BE A RESTRICTED AREA HE WILL BE REQUITED TO PROTECT THE TREES WHICH ARE TO BE SAVED TO BE SURE THAT THE MUIPIAENT ISNOT NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND SHALL DERCSE WEAR DAIMON IN WORKING ADJACENT TO TREES. SHOULD ANY PORTION Of METRE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTORS EMMERT. HE SHALL OBTAIN THE SEMMCES OF A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRIIMWG SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF OPERATION SHOULD THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS RESULT W THE BREMONG OF ANY LIMBS, THE BROKEN LAB3S SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS STALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE TOTHETREE NO TREES SHALL BE RELDVED MOUT AUTHOMMIBN BY THE ENGINEER COSTS FOR TRRAAWG SERVICES SHALL BE GONSBEDED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND IIC SPECIAL PAYMENT LULL BE MADE RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL INCLUDE ALL DESIGNATED TREED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION LONE ALL VEDETATON WHIN THE RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL REMAIN CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT ALL GRADING ANTI CONSTRUCTION ASSUMES TO AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS AGENCIES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LWY BE RESTRICTED TO NARROWER WIDTH INTHE HELD TO SAVE ADDRIONAL TREES AS DWECTED WPM OWNER ACTNmES PROHMnFD OUFSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARIES MIRO INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE UNDID TO: SOIL AND CIDER MATERIAL STOCKPILING, EQWPMENE OR MACHINERY STORAGE, DRMNG OF ANY VEHICLE, LEAKAGE OR SPILLAGE OF ANY WASHOUT. OR OTHER TOM MATERIAL THE COLLECTION OF OTHER DEBRIS AND SOIL SFOCKPUNG WILL BE W AN AREA DETERMINED ONSTTE BYRE EADNEER ALL RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL BE FENDED OFFWIIN BRIGHT ORANGE POLYETHYLENE SAFE -WHETTING AND STEEL STAKES AS SHOWN ON THE TREE PROTECTION DETAIL AT NO TIME MALL THIS FENCING BE REMOVED OR ACTMIY OF ANY MND TAKE RACE MAD! IT. FWD PLACEMENT OPALL PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE COMPLETE BEFORE ANY WORK COMMENCES OHSITE BEFORE COMMENCING WITH ANY EXCAVATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL PREPARATORY WORK REGARDING TREE REMOVAL ROOT MINTING, TREE PRUNING AND STUMP REMOVAL TO THE SATISFACTION TITHE OWNER PREPARATORY WORK SHALL HVCLUBE THE FOLLOWING AND SHALL BE COMPLETED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPER/MON OF THE OWI.YSU'S REPRESENTATIVE 1. TREE REMOVAL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FELL THETREES AT NO TIME SHALL TREES BE BUMMED OUT, BUT SHALL BE CUT DOWN AND STUMPS REMOVED SEPARATELY. PRIOR TO THE MUDD OF ALL TREES PROPER REMOVAL O A MIRROR OR ALL OF THE CANOPY SHALL BE COMPETED SO THATTREES IN THE RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL NOT BE NWRED N THE PROCESS 2. ROOT PRIDEM BEFORE ANY STUMPS ME TO BE REMOVED, ALL ROOTS SHALL BE SEVERED FROM ROOTS MIRE RESIN I tD AREAS BY SAW CURING wmK AVERNIER DESIGNED TOR ROOT PRUNNG, BY HANG, OR MN A CHANSAW. TREE ROOTS PROJECTING NOD THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE SHALL BE EIPOSED PRIOR TO ROOT FRONDS WITH SMALL MAQONERY, I E.., BOBCAT. 3. SUMP REMOVAL AT SUCH TIME THAT ROOTS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY SEVERED. STUMPS MAY BE REMOVED. WHERE RMCNAL OF CERTAIN STUMPS COULD CAUSE OAM GETO COSTING PROTECTED TREES, TREE STUMPS SHALL BE GROUND OUT. ALL STUMP REMOVAL SHALL BE UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE 4. TREE PRUNING: PROPER PROS%OF TREES/ THE RESTRICTED ZONE SHALL BE DIRECTED RYANB SUPERVISION AT ARMES DYNE OWNERS REPRESENTATWE AN OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIFFS DURING THE PREPARATORY ANTI CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. MULCH RATHER THAN SEED OR SOD WILL BE USED ATTRE BASE O QUALITY TREES TO PERIMETER DETERMIED BY THE OWNERS FLEPRESENTATNE AREAS TO BE SEEDED FOR EROSION COMRDL PURPOSES WITHIN THE CONSTRICTION ZONE ARE TO BE DETERBPED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATNE NATURAL GROUND COVER WILL BE MAINTAINED WHEREVER POSSMLE. THE USE OF RETAINING WALLS NEAR TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE REM, BASED ON TREE LOCATIONS AM TOPOGRAPHY: L IFRYE CONTRACTOR EADOUMERS ANY DRAW TILE WHIN THE SRE. HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGWEER WITH THE LOCATION ME, IWERT AND FTHE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN ALE SHALL BE BACIKHLLED WRHOM REVIEW, DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL Hem THE PROJECT ENGINEER. 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET: 1 INCH = 20 FEET FRA y ,., McCombs Frank Rom Associates, Inc 1480028fhAvenue North, Swzi 14+ PWouth • Aewaso(a • 5544 p1N1rx:763/478.3010• Axc 763/47665/ websde: wwwinf2.con Client DW HOLDING, INC. Project WRANGLERS RESTAURANT Location MEDINA, MN. Certification I hereby certify that This plan, spedRGatlM or report was prepared by me or under my (Erect supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional ENGINEER Under the laws of the Slate of Minnesota b DavldJ.Nash Registration No. 21836 Date: 04/14/2009 It macaw, con!. os fora vM Honed emyMlBE plan each Is available upon request at McCombs Frank Rom Associates, Mc., Plymouth, MN ales Summary Designed: DJN Approved: DJN Phase: FINAL Drawn: DJD Book / Page: Initial Issue: 04/142009 Revision History No. Date By Submittal /Rovision Sheet Title GRADING PLAN Sheet Number Revisiol C5e01 m IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY OMEN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER MR THE LOCATION SINE, INVERT AID IF NE TILE LINE S ACTIVE NO ACTIVE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE 6ACYJBLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. Project No. DWH1813t Ma, Engineering • Planning • Surveying x 1023.6 SS z 1026.1 x 1026.5 1027.6'_- x 1026.30 0 x 1027.1 7P E.e.Toot 0 PTO:12-71 :MPIS sr Nuys7-007 PAUL/S ST MARIE RA, 1019.8 � r02r y IE mroiG ,H27.0+1o2 •.o _. /• 7a �6 1 �) .• x 1026.6 • =- - 1021.9 x 100 r- IN LmeIT 1eII.22(NET Laps.Ts(sp 0 10 20 40 ,,,.., INI:11IN111 SCALE IN FEET: 1 INCH = 20 FEET DISTURBED AREA ACREAGE SUMMARY In ACRES PAVEMENT AREA 0.21 ACs EXISTING BUILDING AREA 0.04 AC± SODED AREA C112 AC-.4 TOTAL DISTURBED 0.33 ACs REFER TO SHEET C5.02 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, AND STANDARD DETAILS LEGEND CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SM.) WATERMAIN EASEMENT DRAINTILE GAS UNE ELECTRIC TELEPHONE SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR SILT FENCE PROPOSED EXISTING -» -11 0 NO •- 0->F14>--C1 I--} 1 ->>OT»- Uc DE Ur $625 X 902 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 1 O IPl TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ........ SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION PHASE I: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. NT 111: UT- 962.5 X 4102 2. CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES ON THE SITE. 3. HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO PERFORM INSPECTION OF BMPs. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER AND ALL GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE 5. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE. 6. START CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURES. PHASE II: 1. TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS. 2. INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. 3. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 4. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. 5. PAVE SITE 6. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. 7. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING. B. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS STABILIZED), IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT NOTE TO GONTRACTDR: n����®g¢�m'"�ynffi�n� � THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDMONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FLUNG THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. SOIL EROSION / SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE CeaamurneeaaAeaa APT MAT Aw m (114111.144 NOTE: CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE McCombs Frank Root Associates, Inc 1480028tilAvenue Nalh, 9tle 74( lienourh • Minnesota • 5544, phone: 763/476-6010• far 7133/476-853. VWbsie: www.Mra.con Client DW HOLDING, INC. Project WRANGLERS RESTAURANT Location MEDINA, MN. Certification I hereby mit* that this plan, speddcaeon or report was prepared by me or under my (Urea supervision and lhat I am a duty licensed Professional ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. David J. Nash Registration No. 21835 Date:004/2000 II applicable, contact us for a wel•igned copy MOTs plan which is available upon request at McCombs FrzNCReus Assodoes, Inc, PlymoWl. MNcam Summary Designed: DJN Approved: DJN Phase: FINAL MOM: DJD Book / Page; Initial issue: 04/142009 Revision History No. Date Bg Submittal / Revision Sheet Title EROSION CONTROL PLAN Sheet Number Revision R THE SUBSURFACE INERT INFORMATION SHOWN ONTHESE PLANS IS UTILITY OUALRY LEVEL 0. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINER ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CIWSCE 38-02, TRIO •STA19AR0 GUDEMNES FOR THE COLLECTION ANO DEPICTION OF GUSTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.. THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCDNRIACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL DUSTING unLmm BEFORE COMMENCING WORK HT CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE DNE FOR MNNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR ANO/oR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FIALY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AMP ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FALURE TO EXACTLYLOGATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL TERRIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAR). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILEWRHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOON THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION. SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINENACTIVE NO ACTNE MANTLE SHALL BE}MONELLEO% MOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINER. C6.01 Project No. QWH18139 e NEEMMEME Engineering • Planning • Surveying N �` j( \cc r \�c< r « --- \ ii.1 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM MN W/ CORE DRILL & BOOT IE=1017.95 EXTEND SANITARY SERVICE 36 LF 4° SCHEDULE 40 ® 2.0% B5 LF 6" FIRE SERVICE 6"-90° BEND CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE - VERIFY 2" PIPE SIZE, LOCATION, & CONDITION CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE - VERIFY 4" PIPE SIZE, LOCATION, INVERT, & CONDITION MINIMUM SLOPE =2% CONNECT TO EX " 6" WATERMAIN �'�VLLONG SLEEVE c n • < 0 Itl Ili rl; 11( 1r' I OnNFR PIEU MPLS STTPAU�150p72 RR �0 rl ! • 111 ,N%in; ._ 11 THE SUBSURFACE Ufalt'/ INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A DENNY QUALIFY LEVEL D. me DUALTY LEVEL WAS DETERh1NED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CMSCE38-02, TIRED!STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AK) DEPICTION OF GUSTING SUBSURFACE UNLIIY DATA" THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL BUSTING DRUPES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK BY 5 CONTACTING TIE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR! M1ESmN. THE CONDUCTOR AAO/DR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESIN/BIBLE FOR /WAND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH FIGHT BE OCCASIONED INNIS DR HER FAME TD EYACTLY LOCATE ANO PRESERVE ANY AND ALL VARIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SDP, M URANO IF THE TILE LINE a ALIVE ND ACTIVE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACNFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROIA THE PROJECT ENGINEER < R[ 10}L1' IE 101493 « `C 1 cJ « « _- 69 LF 12" HDPE c 0 4.75% :I, Cr co F .......+'�c a: WAT INV=1019.5 ® !ADC SAN MAX INV=1022r4 WAT INV=1019.5 ® BLDG 4 REMOVE 2.3' EX WATER SERVICA U •� 9 4 t • •d;;t i;1114L:• iii.SIIjLJ• /1 k_0 REMO/VE 9.8. EX SAN. SERVICE ''ICM r �r c < W co CB 1 LOW POINT CASTING (SEE DETAIL) RE=1024.23 IE=1021.23 SUMP=1020.23 W1000N nREPu¢ / r < c « <- RE r01S9a K 1011.)9' Aa, I I I I ) I i i I I I RE101a92 1E1010.270E) ID 100a.Ts(9/v4 1 LEGEND CURB 8 GUTTER STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SAN.) WATERMAIN EASEMENT DRAINRLE GAS LINE ELECTRIC TELEPHONE PROPOSED EXISTING ->>-11 O ss >-00 ipp- I -110. -»oT» UG UE UT UTILITMCH STR� UCTINNTTES 1.0 St Ua ..-... Ion -..... lOt A. THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS' AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS. 1. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TO COY REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPACTOR 3. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS. B. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIRCATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CRY. - 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE 4° SCHEDULE 40, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE PVC C-900 W/ POLY WRAP, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, WRH 7.5 FEET MINIMUM COVER 4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HOPE, AND RUBBER GASKETS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. IF USED, RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn/DOT CLASS 3. C. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING URLRY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. D. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING (M RIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BONG FACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTIUTIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILTIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, BY CAWNG GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454-0002 E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE COMPACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. F. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE OUP( OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. G. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 61NCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SOD. J. K. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFHC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFHC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY: COMPANY: NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED ADDRESS: 6588141ST AVE NW RAMSEY, MN 55303 PHONE: 763.433.9175 DATED: TBD THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THIS SOILS REPORT. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER THE TREES AND OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND/OR ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT ARE OF PRIME CONCERN TO THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS. HE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE TREES WHICH ARE TO BE SAVED TO BE SURE THAT EQUIPMENT IS NOT NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN WORKING ADJACENT TO TREES. SHOULD ANYPORTION OFTHE TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT, HE SHALL OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE OPERATION. SHOULD THE CONTRACTORS' OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS, THE BROKEN LIMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MIMMQE ANY DAMAGE. COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION AND NO SPECIAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. MFRA McCombs frank Roo: Associates, Inc 146W28thAvenue North, & Loob 14 Phm oath • Afry eso6.5544 phone: 7631476.6010• far 763/476.853 uebsde: wwwmfracor Client DW HOLDING, INC. Project WRANGLERS RESTAURANT Location MEDINA, MN. Certification I hereby certify that this plan, specter:don or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and tall am a duly licensed Professional ENGINEER under the laws of the Slate of Mi nesola. David 3. Nash Registration No. 21836 Date: 04/14/2009 II applicable, contact us By a wa1 slated copy of Dis plat with H av llabla upon lequect al McCombs Frank Roes Asn:1.4;1w, Plymouth, Means Summary Designed: DIN Approved: DJN Phase: FINAL Drawn: CID Book / Page: Initial Issue: 04/142009 Revision History No. Date By Submittal/Revision Sheet Title UTILITY PLAN Sheet Number Revision G7.Q1 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET: 1 INCH = 20 FEET Project No, OW1118139 " NONMENDMINEERIMINMIENVE Enginleenng " Planning " Sunreyinc Landscape Schedule .,��,.�o����.�� 01VOI .����.���� ..,1.21..w 21.MMII1M,.4 a��,,��8 ��. ,...it<alalen��..,.,. 1..��,.,1rz,. KEY I BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ISIZB ROOTIOTY. I REMARKS DECIDUOUS TREES ��ON, 44�� Celtis occidentalis HACKBERRY 2.5' BB 3 ORNAMENTAL TREES ,S'1��� 6rr9' Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' SERVICEBERRY 1.5' BB 1 t" . .:1 I r.%;"toy PPROXIMATE LUMINAIRE 101 a.,����,a a.,��aa,e,.����.a,:,.wwe�� aa��:w ��,��,a.aaaa,.m,,..,.��_" ,��a..a�� _.,,a2Y��a,.a,,,��ar,,.��a,Aaa��wa��e. _..... GENERAL NGTE aw SOD TYPICAL IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS. NO PARKING SIGN APPROXIMATE LUMINAIRE C PARKING SIGN RVICEBERRY 0 10'em Ej ACKBERRY !) 1'" I I 4 . �nRl 1 Li {q li'1 iI1 ACKBERRY n: r�� {;" 0 .INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS 0 0"k Medium to large - 2' col. ����' ��u deciduous trees or o Smalml deciduo amantolus - 1 1/2' `\`������ 4' layer Cypress mulch -treated not to touch bark of tree NOTE 1. rum bock the top portion of the burlap to half the depth of root boil and remove any nails within this area. 2. Remove any plastic or wire baskets around root bail. 3. Scarify the bowl surface for easy root penitration. 4. Boulevard trees to be planted on both sides of the street at 40' on center spacing. Trees to be planted in accordance with City's londscope ordinance. Species must be approved by City. 5. See typical street section for location relative to curbs and walks. Minimum of 3' separation from all walks and curbs. 6. Do not cut leoders of the tree 7. Staking of trees shall be done by contractor as needed. 6. Notify City of planting schedule 72 hours prior to installation. Benestroo Rosen. Anderlll: & &modetes eoelnor o " Arab/bob 21. raw Itl,vwom STANDARD DETAILS TREE PLANTING DETAIL MEDINA, MINNESOTA (Loot Rondore 01-05 5RA PRM No: d6" Plate No: GEN-07 150_tiodlno Pietas 2005 " 1 I ...>.._ ...Ilj I !) f I . r' I I I I f cow 1 1e:100d:1 : ,h14N,2111R1 110001:11402 PLANTINGNOTES �� 1.1�� p� ��'������run�� UTOMIS 1��H 1. ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND BURLAPPED AS INDICATED IN THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. 2. ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED AND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. 3. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION. 4. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK; ANSR60, LATEST EDITION, OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALM' REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. 6. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATERIALS ETC. WITH 4 HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING. 7. ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, SHAPES OF BEDS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE THE STAKING LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS PRIOR TO OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454-0002 (1WIN CITIES METRO AREA) OR 800,252-1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. 17. USE ANTI -DESICCANT (WILTPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL) ON DECIDUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED ANYTIME APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION. ALL EVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IN THE LATE FALL FOR WINTER PROTECTION DURING WARRAMY PERIOD. 18. PLANTING SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS: FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT OF HUMUS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAIMNG VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COMPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSOIL. MATURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HARDTACK SUBSOIL, STONES, CHEMICALS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, ETC, SOIL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 AND 10-0-10 FERTIU2ER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD. IN PLANTING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED BY ROTOTI W NG IT INTO THE TOP 12' OF SOIL 19. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE COMPLETE GROWING SEASON (APRIL 1 - NOVEMBER 1), UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION. 8. ALL TREES MUST BE PLANTED, MULCHED, AND STAKED AS SHOWN IN THE 21. SEASONS/TIME OF PLANTING AND SEEDING: NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY DETAILS. ELECT TO PLANT IN OFF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HINHER RISK. 9. ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. DECIDUOUS POTTED PLANTS: APRIL 1-JUNE 1; AUG. 21-NOV.1 10. MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS DECIDUOUS B&B: APRIL 1JUNE 1; AUG. 214IOV.1 OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS: APRIL 1-JUNE 1; AUG. 21-OCT.1 TREES, UNLESS INDICATED AS ROCK MULCH ON DRAWINGS SUBMIT SAMPLE TO EVERGREEN B&B: APRIL 1-MAY 15; AUG. 2ISEPT.15 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DELNERY ON -SITE FOR APPROVAL DELIVER TURF/AWN SEEDING: APRIL I- JUNE I; JULY 20-SEPT. 20 MULCH ON DAY OF INSTALLATION. USE 4' FOR TREES, SHRUB BEDS, AND 3' FOR NATIVE MIX SEEDING: APRIL 15-JULY 20; SEPT. 20-OCT. 20 PERENNIAL/GROUND COVER BEDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED. 22. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS 11. THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND IF DISCREPANCIES IN PLACE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE EXIST. THE SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANTING NOTES AND INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND GENERAL NOTES. PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. VERIFY ALL MATERIALS, RE -SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME 13.LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ONSTTE WILL NOT BE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBIUTIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOWED. CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THOUGHOUT THE 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS, PLANTERS AND BUILDINGS CLEAN GUARANTEE PERIOD. AND UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE ACCESS TO BE MNNTANED 23. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE DELNERY SHALL BE HEELED IN AND WATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION, PLANTS AND MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND SPECIFICATIONS, NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING 24. WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAVE() AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EVENSE. WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING APPUCABLE CODES,REGULATIONS, AND PERMIT'S GOVERNING THE WORK LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE 16. LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES,WITH THE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER, 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING, A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. 26. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN BUILD. 27. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED, ARE TO RECENE 4' TOP SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. Luminalre Schedule e.a������., ��M1.211 aa,��ti Oty Label Symbol Description Wattage Arrangement 1 A LO Shoebox; (250HPS) 208 Volt; 12' round aluminum pole 200 Watt SINGLE 1 W 0 Sconce 111-FT-HPS - 150 HPS 120 Volt 100 Watt SINGLE TYPE (A) FIXTURE: EMC0 - Avalume TYPE (W) FIXTURE: WALL MOUNT (GAR8C0) 0 10 20 40 e' SCALE IN FEET: 11NCH a 20 FEET McCombs Frank Rot Associates, In 14800281hAvenue Noah, Suds 1 Fljano{4h " Monesofa " 554 phone: 763/476.6010" fac 763/476.85 *abode: wwwmhacc Client Dw HOLDING, INC. Project WRANGLERS RESTAURANT Location MEDINA, MN. Certification Summary Designed: DJN Drawn: DJD Approved: DIN Book / Page: Phase: FINAL Initial Issue: 04/142009 Revision History No. Date By Submittal / Revision Sheet Title LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN Sheet Number Revision C9a01 ...111101,116 Project No. DWH18139 e HAMEL COMMONS KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That DW Holding, Inc., Inc. a Minnesota corporation, DW Holding, Inc., of TAXPAYERS SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Hennepin County, Minnesota the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: That part of Lot 38, Auditor's Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minn., described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said Lot 38; thence south along the west line of said Lot 38 to the northeast corner of Lot 39, Auditors Subdivision No. 241; thence east along the north line of said Lot 39 extended to a point 107 feet west of the east line of Lot 37, Auditor's Subdivision No. 241, measured at right angles thereto; thence north parallel to the west line of said Lot 38 to the north line of said Lot 38; thence west a along the north line of said Lot 38 to the point of beginning; The Westerly 75 feet of Lot 40, Auditor's Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minn., That part of Lot 40, Auditors Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minn., lying east of the westerly 75 feet of said Lot 40 and west of a line drawn parallel to the east line of said Lot 40 and distance 107 feet westerly therefrom measured at right angles thereto. Lot 39, Auditors Subdivision No. 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as HAMEL COMMONS, and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways, and does also dedicate the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said DW Holding, Inc., Inc. a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 200 . SIGNED: By: as STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,200 ,by , as of DW Holding, Inc., Inc, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I hereby certify that this plat of HAMEL COMMONS; is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been or will be correctly set within one year as indicated on the plat; that all water boundaries and wet lands as of the date of the surveyor's certification are shown and labeled on the plat; that all public ways are shown and labeled on the plat. I further certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Henry D. Nelson, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 17255 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 200 by Henry D. Nelson, a Licensed Land Surveyor. I hereby certify that taxes payable in 200_ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this day of , 200 . Jill L. Alverson, Hennepin County Auditor By: Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this day of 200 . William P. Brown, Hennepin County Surveyor By: COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of HAMEL COMMONS was filed for record in this office this day of 200 at o'clock .M. Michael H. Cunniff, Hennepin County Recorder By: ,Deputy REGISTRAR OF TITLE, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby cenify that the within plat of HAMEL COMMONS was filed for record in this office this day of 200 at o'clock .M. Michael H. Conniff, Hennepin County Recorder By: Deputy 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET: 1 INCH = 20 FEET DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT O SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 17255. • DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND. Notary Public, County, Minnesota THE BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, My Commission Expires NADB3 (1986 ADJUST). WITH AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 02 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST FOR THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23. MEDINA, MINNESOTA This plat of HAMEL COMMONS was approved and accepted by the City Council of Medina, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 200 . H applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. City Council, Medina, Minnesota By: Mayor By. Clerk DRAINAGE AND UTIUTY EASEMENTS ARE SHOW THUS (NOT TO SCALE) 5— F10 — —5 r10 BEING 5 FEET IN %BOTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT ONES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY ONES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. 5/ I / / d.3. L_ 74.0 P I I r^W / \ `j , l r \^e / t / / / ,:: / a / / -i CO / N I i!j CV/ :2_ .Iu 1 O / to i L. 0 T 1 'a; N I 2 / % K 1 / / / / / 3 / I / 62 / / 2 / l y e NC 0 ORNER ts,� / ` ` LOT 30 415-.- /1-" _ ,``�1 I S781323 61.q � 1 42. RL �j y 92 �R 984.88 Y~ 5 / BLOC / I / / I I 1 1 / NLY A,Av UNf or (F K . "'Kroft „40 -_: / 1 1 / rt . , I 1 I / NW CORNER LOT 313, 1 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION- / NO. 241 / Ira 8 75.01 ` l 7�23 — 15600 6/.47 1.1 MT O 1 O a co "7N UNf o„ 37 4, 07.00 C.R. DOC. NO. R.T. DOC. NO. r� 5 II 107.00 i -EAST I'?;7UNfOF1 ._j' N THU�OFNfOP7 0.s76i7Y3 E. aN I h 1: I 1 /- I / 1 I McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING, PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING General Notes New walls for mechanical and beer cooler to be block covered With siding that matches existing structure and painted To match existing structure New trash dumpster enclosure to be made of block covered With siding that matches existing structure and painted to match existing structure Sign on front of building- Cover existing sign with new black weather proof material and mount new light up Wranglers sign to face of existing sign. Sign to be red lettered Rear entrance canopy to be half round black with red Wranglers logo on face not lighted. Existing utilities to be relocated to new mechanical room (Electric Service, Water, Sewer) gas to remain as is Adding new slab for Mechanical, Beer Cooler and Dumpster Work with city on cleaning up front landscape new sidewalks still being installed leave existing pavers add new front stoop with frost footings clean up existing bushes and shrubs Add new stoop for new mechanical room with frost footings Remodel interior of building to accommodate new business per all local, city and state codes Pod Table Dance Floor And Possible Stage Scale: 1/4" = V-0" .o =«Zit :o►es 6ulmaaa aas sa}oN leaauae 1 111 11111 II 11111 111111 I f 1 1 1 I ( I 11111 11111 111111 1I11111 111111 11111111111 1�' 1111 111111111 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1111111 I 11111111 11111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111111111 1111 1111111111111111 1111111111111111 I1I111i 11111111 1 �11111 111" I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 11 I I I I I 1 I I 111 IIIl lllllll_I 1" 1 1 Ill 1 1 11 11111 1 1 1 I f J ProtIvuivitar I r t I r t_ 1 I fl II11111I111I111 II I I I I 1 I I III 1 1 1 11I1111II111 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 I 1_ 1 l 1 T 1 1 1 11 I IIII 111 11 1111 1III1111 11 11111 1 11111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 10,1 1 I I I I I 1 11 1 111111I 11111111111 11 11 11 1111111 1111111 1 1 1 I 1 1111111 I I111111 111111 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 I 1111111 1111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 I III1111111111 II 111111 11111 I III11111 11111 11111 f11I1 'l11 1 11111 1 1 I I11I 1'Ill I I111 11111 1I1I1 11111 I1 1111 111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 111 11111111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111I1111 11111111 11111 111 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 11111111111 111III 1111I1 II 111III 1 1111111 III III 11 1 111 1111 11 1 1 1 I111 1111I I I 1111111I General Notes See Drawing 1 Scale: 1/2" =1=0" fbianolir8 Saloon Of llama Road Mosilas, AfAf Owl Plow Existing Cedar Shakes Painted to match Rest of building Ct0v V Y Y New Curb to be sloped at trash enclosure entrance and new slab for enclosure to be flush with curb Rear View /New wall for beer mooch and HVAC to be sided and painted to match existing structure. /— New Slab for cooler and HVAC Side View Scale: 1/2" =1%0" • New trash enclosure pad to have frost footings • New trash enclosure pad to be minimum12" thick • Enclosure to built out of cedar and painted to match existing and new structure • Enclosure to be 6' tall to keep dumpsters out of general view Wranglers Saloon. 32 Hamel Road Medina, MN Pawl tritelosars Daaiwlail General Notes for Trash Enclosure and Wall around HVAC and Beer Cooler • Trash enclosure to be constructed of Cedar and painted to match existing building • Curb for parking lot to be sloped at trash enclosure entrance for removal of dumpster • Trash enclosure fence to be 6' in height • Wall around HVAC and beer cooler to be 8' in height • Wall to be sided and painted to match existing building will provide attractive appearance • Gates for HVAC and beer cooler to be made of black wrought iron and lockable