HomeMy Public PortalAbout05-12-2009-P..)\D1 tc
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, MAY 12, 2009
7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24)
1. Call to Order
2. Public Comments on items not on the agenda
3. Update from City Council proceedings
4. Planning Department Report
5. Approval of April 14, 2009 Planning Commission minutes.
6. Public Hearing: Wranglers Restaurant — David Willis (PIDs 12-118-
23-41-0012, 12-118-23-41-0013 & 12-118-23-41-00014) —
Preliminary Plat to combine two lots and Site Plan Review to
construct a parking lot for a proposed restaurant/bar.
7. Adjourn
POSTED IN CITY HALL MAY 8, 2009
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Dusty Finke, Associate Planner
DATE: May 8, 2009
SUBJ: Planning Department Updates for May 12, 2009 Commission Meeting
Ordinance Updates
A) CUP Standards for Religious Institutions — the ordinance was reviewed by the City
Council, who directed staff to make a few changes and provide additional information on
intensity regulations and parking requirements. The ordinance and rezoning ordinance
are planned to be back on the Council agenda on June 2.
B) Animal Unit Density Standards — staff will prepare amendments as directed by the City
Council for the RR zoning district regulations. Staff intends to publish notice for a Public
Hearing at the June Planning Commission meeting.
C) Private Recreation Zoning District — the ordinance will be placed on a future agenda
after the Council has acted on the Public/Semi-Public zoning ordinances.
D) General Business and Industrial Ordinances — the ordinance will be placed on a future
agenda following Council action on the PREC ordinance.
Land Use Application Reviews
A) Michael Anderson (and Wallace Anderson) Final Plat — 985 and 995 Medina Road —
The City Council has approved this final plat, and staff is reviewing the septic design
before signing and recording the plat.
B) Woodridge Church — 1500 County Road 24 — the applicant has provided an extension
that extends 60 days following the completion of the moratorium. They plan to be
active in the discussion regarding the updated ordinance regulations.
C) Wrangler's Restaurant — 32 Hamel Road — The applicant has submitted updated plans
and staff is reviewing the application. Notice has been sent for a Public Hearing at the
May 12 Planning Commission meeting.
D) Holy Name Cemetery — The City Council directed staff to prepare resolutions approving
the lot combination, CUP/Site Plan, and Interim Use Permit. The resolutions and the
review of the easement vacation will be on the May 19 City Council agenda.
Additional Proiects
A) Comprehensive Plan Update — Staff has made the changes as directed by Council and
has mailed the Update back to the Metropolitan Council for review. The Plan, as
submitted, will be available on the City's website early next week as well.
B) Code Enforcement — Staff has noted a significant clean-up of a property located in
Independence Beach after staff made the owner aware of multiple nuisance violations.
Planning Department Update
Page 1 of 1 May 5, 2009
City Council Meeting
Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes
CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
Draft Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
1. Call to Order: Commissioner Robin Reid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Planning Commissioners, Robin Reid, Michele Litts, Victoria Reid, Beth Nielsen, Jim
Simons and Mary Verbick.
Absent: Charles Nolan
Also Present: City Administrator Chad Adams, Associate Planner Dusty Finke, and Planning
Assistant Debra Peterson -Dufresne
2. Public Comments on Items not on the Agenda:
No public comments.
3. Update from City Council Proceedings:
Weir updated the Commission that the City Council:
• Approved the four commercial ordinances;
• Approved a civil defense siren installation agreement with Hennepin County for a
siren to be placed on the Hennepin County Public Works site;
• Approved a feasibility report for 2009 mill and overlay road projects for a section of
Pioneer Trail, and the neighborhoods of Cherry Hills, Elm Creek Drive and Sycamore
Trail, with costs to be partially assessed to benefiting properties;
• Approved a Data Practices procedure that makes correspondence concerning Medina
City matters to be available upon request. This procedure includes staff, Council,
Planning and Park Commissions;
• Reviewed a commercial business survey that will serve as a basis for our summer
intern to research ways Medina can help to incentivize businesses to locate in
Medina;
• Administrator Chad Adams, Mayor Crosby, Liz Weir and Deb Peterson -Dufresne
promoted to our representatives an extension of the five year -rule governing RIF
Districts to July 2014, in order to allow the City to build more infrastructure in
Uptown Hamel and to have it count as "in -district" expenses. Our bill will be
included in the Omnibus Bill, but whether it survives multiple amendments to TIF
requests is another matter;
• Authorized staff to look at purchasing land for a future water tower;
• Directed staff to look how to remedy the unfortunate placement of electrical boxes at
the junction of Sioux Drive and Hamel Road in Uptown Hamel, which impede sight
lines at the junction and detract from the general appeal of the streetscape;
1
Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes
• Recognized Public Works Superintendent Steve Scherer for 15 years of service;
• Made adjustments to the Comprehensive Plan, as required by Met Council. Our
biggest issue is the restrictions the Met Council has placed on Conservation
Developments in the Long-term Sewered Service Area, basically the MCWD, in the
southern third of the City. The Met Council objective works directly against
Medina's goal to preserve ecologically sensitive areas and the City's rural heart;
• Agreed to limit master landscaping plan for Hamel Legion Park;
• Reminded the Commission that Clean-up Day is April 25th at City Hall from 8:00
a.m. to 2:00 p.m. All volunteers are welcome and it is a fun community day.
• Endorsed Commissioner Simon's concept of including total capacity to regulate the
intensity of use of institutions within RR districts.
4. Planning Department Report:
Finke updated the Commission on upcoming projects and ordinances such:
• Wranglers Restaurant in Uptown Hamel
• Comprehensive Plan Ordinance Update
• Annual Park Tour Invitation
• Bird Watching Tour
5. Approval of March 10, 2009 Planning Commission Minutes:
Motion by Litts, seconded by Verbick to approve the March 10, 2009 minutes with
recommended changes. Motion carried unanimously.
6. Presentation: Low Impact Design — Julie Westerlund, Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District.
7. Public Hearing: Holy Name Cemetery — (PIDs 24-118-23-14-0011 & 24-118-23-14-
0006) — Lot Combination, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, Interim Use Permit, and
Easement Vacation to expand existing cemetery and construct a wooded pathway for
cremation burials.
Peterson -Dufresne presented the application to the Commission. The Church purchased the
property to the east of the existing cemetery and proposes to combine the lots in order to expand
onto this property. The applicant proposed 344 additional in -ground burial sites and 100 above-
ground niches that will be placed along a proposed woodchip path in the wooded area on the lot.
The wooded pathway would have above -ground stones and benches for cremation remains.
Peterson -Dufresne stated that the Interim Use Permit arises in order to allow the single-family
home to continue to be used on the same lot as the cemetery. She also stated that the home and
in -ground burial location meet setback requirements of the ordinance. The woodchip path
encroaches within the setback to the north, so staff has recommended as a condition of approval
2
Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes
that no above -ground cremation niches be allowed in the setback area. Peterson -Dufresne stated
that the septic tanks were inspected last fall and not found to be weather tight. A condition of
approval has also been placed for correction or replacement of the septic tanks. She stated that
five trees would potentially be impacted by the in -ground burials due to the dripline of the trees.
Dan Garry, Parish Administrator, stated that the church purchased the single family home
property 15 years ago from the Armstrong's. They have 50 existing in -ground sites
remaining with approximately 20 burials per year. He said that they would like a decision on
their application so that they know whether they can use the property for the cemetery. He
explained the Phase II plan and how it will provide additional options for grieving family
members in the future. He stated they are relatively flexible and wishes to please the area
residents.
Public Hearing is opened at 8:22 p.m.
V. Reid asked Garry if the condition to limit the use of the single family home for a maximum of
15-years is a concern. Garry stated that 15 years is a fairly long time and he is not certain the
church will utilize the home over the entire time.
Weir stated she was concerned with the 74 black hills spruce trees since the tree ordinance
encourages the use of multiple species of trees to ward off any diseases that could eliminate a
large mass of trees in one area. Peterson -Dufresne stated that adding more than one tree type
could be a condition of approval.
V. Reid asked if notification was sent to surrounding neighbors. Peterson -Dufresne stated that
mailings were sent out providing notice.
Verbick raised concern with the potential increased internal roadway width for Phase II since it's
a low impact project. She liked the recommendation staff placed on the project, which
requires the roadway to be re-evaluated. She would like to not immediately increase the
width of the roads. Peterson -Dufresne explained the Fire Marshal's concern for access that
wouldn't necessarily be fire related. She would also like the evaluation to be done mindfully
and not go overboard, so not to compromise some of our commitments to water quality.
Neilson asked why staff is recommending the road widening wait until Phase II. She asked if it
was because of the limited amount of use. Peterson -Dufresne concurred. Neilson also
inquired as to why vehicles are parked along the cemetery road on Sundays, which appears to
be for church service or overflow. Brian O'Brien, the cemetery volunteer, stated that parking
in the cemetery usually only occurs on Christmas and Easter. Neilson further stated she sees
parking there on most Sundays and O'Brien explained that the people parking there are
attending the church service and the cemetery to visit their loved ones.
V. Reid asked if the wetland delineation was for one of the lots or for both lots. Peterson -
Dufresne clarified the wetland delineation was for both lots. She further explained that the
delineation couldn't start until after May 1, 2009.
3
Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes
Public Hearing closed at 8:29 p.m.
Simons said he supports the condition requiring replacement of trees if more than 15 percent of
significant trees do not survive the construction of Phase I. He further stated the proposal
was well prepared, complete, and supported moving forward with a motion of approval.
Peterson -Dufresne suggested adding a condition requiring diversification of trees rather than all
of the 74 trees being black hills spruce. The Commission supported the added condition.
Motion by Simons, Seconded by Verbick to recommend approval of the CUP, IUP, and Site
Plan review with two additional conditions noted by the Commission (absent Nolan).
8. Public Hearing: Ordinance Amendment — Chapter 8, Sections 825 and 826 of the Citv's
Code — Regulations related to the Public/Semi-Public zoning district and other
regulations related to institutional land uses such as municipal buildings and religious
institutions.
Finke presented the ordinance amendment explaining how the City got where it is currently with
the growth of City Hall and Churches within the RR zoning districts. He explained the
moratorium to the Commission in how it allows the City time to research what direction it
should go with institutional uses. It helps create a new district for institutional uses in the
rural area; also removes the uses in the RR districts. Other changes to be made during the
ordinance update would include allowing institutional uses in sewered residential areas.
Finke further explained that the City has to look at both the 2000-2020 and 2020-2030
Comprehensive Plan objectives. He explained what uses would be permitted, conditional,
accessory and prohibited within the new RPS District. He pointed out with direction of PC
and CC that schools would be prohibited in the district since the Commission and Council
felt that a sewered area would be more appropriate.
Finke explained the recommended and existing lot standards for City Hall, Woodridge Church
and First Apostolic Church. A comparison of Lake Elmo was also provided for comparison.
Finke explained building design regulations related to size (maximum building size of 50,000
square feet total floor area and 35,000 square feet maximum building footprint), height,
exterior building materials, and multi -sided architecture was explained as directed by the
Commission last month.
Finke explained landscaping and screening, highlighting the use of LID practices, tree planting
and tree preservation. He recommended the Commission discuss the tree planting
recommendation.
Finke recommended outdoor lighting to have zero foot-candles 25 feet from the property line,
which would require the applicant to take active steps in reducing light impacts. Mechanical
equipment and trash enclosures were also noted with City Hall not being in compliance.
4
Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes
Finke reviewed standards for religious institutions:
• Access to arterial roadways would be required
• Sanctuary seating capacity would be limited to 500 persons
• Existing facilities would conform without an ability to substantially expand
• A maximum of 500 persons on site to be allowed at one time, with the exception of four
larger events allowed per year
He further explained similar regulations for City Hall as adopted for religious institutions such as
occupancy.
The Commission also discussed daycare/early childhood education as an accessory use and how
they relate to the principal use. The Commission concluded that daycares/early childhood
education would have size restrictions.
Verbick asked if there was a place in the City we could use LID practices. Finke said it could be
placed within the purpose statement so if opportunities arise it would be in the ordinance.
Simons stated the proposed changes seem to avoid nonconformity. He asked if staff had
examples of instances where nonconformities were avoided purposefully. Finke said the lot
size standards and parking setbacks were examples. He further explained building materials
would bring many buildings out of compliance. Simons asked staff concerning occupancy
load information. Finke explained the largest church has 930 max people.
Public Hearing opened @ 9:14 p.m.
Carol Busch, 2175 Hollybush Road, has been a resident for 17 years and has been attending
Woodridge Church for about 10 years. She explained that experiences at the church have
enriched their lives. The addition that the church proposes fills an empty area at the rear of
the building and should not have an impact to surrounding properties. She feels the church is
an asset to the City.
R. Reid explained to the public that the item is not to talk about a specific church.
Steve Hoffer, staff member @ Woodridge Church, resides in City of Plymouth and has issues
that were raised at the last Planning Commission meeting. He considers himself a resident
even though he doesn't live in Medina. He explained that he met with neighbors near
Woodridge Church to try and resolve concerns related to traffic, existing entrance (the
entrance location was not their choice), hard -surface run-off, and quality of water, exterior
lighting. He feels the Commission has done an excellent job, with the exception that the
number of persons proposed to be allowed to exceed 500 people. He said Woodridge Church
exceeds the 500 people maximum. He explained they are in the City of Medina and want to
be respectful of the community. They do not have plans or designs that create them to be a
mega church.
5
Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes
R. Reid asked if the ordinance allowed them to expand to twice the size of the sanctuary as it is
today, would it work for Woodridge Church. Steve said possibly, but it would depend on
what would be allowed with the other square footage.
Nielsen asked if a church has larger events would they need additional parking. Hopper said
they have been fine with existing parking. Simons commented on the threshold related to
size of churches. He further explained that some sort of stipulation is necessary. Hopper
explained that the City should base it on the building and fire codes that are already in place.
Peter Slocum, 1752 Co. Rd 24, asked if nonconforming vacant lots could be developed in the
RPS district for institutional uses and if they needed to have five acres of suitable soils. He
has issues with lighting; and wonders if the number of lights the church is using could be
reduced if the church doesn't need all of them in use. He also likes the screening code.
Finally, he does not like the 50,000 square foot allowance and prefers 40,000 square feet,
since a lot of the churches could double in size; and he doesn't feel it's appropriate in the
rural residential district.
Ann Kuntz of Station 19 Architects, project manager, said church planning is their focus and
they work all over the country. She said churches almost without exception have multiple
uses going on at the same time, which make it rather arbitrary to use a multiplier. She said
the IBC regulation is already being handled. She feels the City is taking on an area that is
already being handled through the building code and placing it into zoning ordinance. She
feels most regulations recommended can be met by most churches, with the exception of
number of occupants. She recently finished a church with 2500 occupants and it was a
50,000 square foot building. She said she is all for sustainability. Lastly, the number of
persons is the sticking point in the ordinance.
Martha VandeVen, 1765 Medina Road, said she has a concern with intensity of institutional
uses. She would like the use to conform to the surroundings. She counted traffic on the
Sunday prior to Easter and counted 415 vehicles with two services. Her concern is if the
facility was expanded it would be more people going to the site, which would result in traffic
problems. Woodridge's web -site has thirty-four adult discussion groups that meet off -site. If
those groups came to the church after it expanded, it would mean more traffic. She used an
example of Wooddale Church in Eden Prairie, which has a large number of services. She
still has a concern with septic and run-off and encouraged the Commission and staff to look
at it further.
Alan Wondra, 2045 Tamarack Drive, said he lives in a home approximately 2000 square feet in
size. He gave an example of his home size in relationship to a 50,000 square foot building
and felt it is way too intense for a rural area, especially if it's on private sewer. He likes the
idea of having wastewater calculations to measure the intensity of use. The number of seats
in the sanctuary isn't the best way to come up with the maximum size or capacity.
Bruce Quam, an attendee at Woodridge Church who lives in Minnetrisa, said they can adjust
lighting and the sanctuary is not being proposed to expand. He said the septic system would
be expanded and water run-off has improved with the holding ponds captured. He added that
6
Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes
the church is also in compliance with parking. Simons asked about the agricultural field
comparison, and Quam explained they have a pond.
Cal Peterson, representative of First Apostolic Church, built in 2003, said they have a very low
level of activity with bible classes on Wednesday night and two services on Sunday. His
main concern is the sanctuary size. They do not have classrooms and all activities are done
in the sanctuary. He feels the church would be impacted by the maximum 500 sanctuary
seats. He is also asking for relief on the exterior building materials, since the church has
vinyl siding.
Simons asked for specific roadway standards for religious institutions. Finke explained roadway
classifications.
Verbick was interested in any staff response to citizen comments and concerns. Finke explained
the rational for the 50,000 square foot building maximum and the sanctuary size. He further
explained the City has a number of structures in the RR lots that are in the 20,000 square foot
range.
R. Reid asked about church steeples and how they are measured. Finke explained that the City
does allow exceptions and further explained how to measure building height.
Simons recommends to not guide institutional uses along minor arterial roadways. He prefers
arterial roadways. Finke summarized opinion. R. Reid concurred with Simons opinion.
R. Reid asked if something could be done with the time lights should be turned off. Finke
explained that turning lights off at 10:00 pm would mean the current City hall lights would
be out of compliance tonight, but could be looked at as a condition of approval.
Simons asked about screening and blocking the view of single family homes. Finke said that he
could add language referencing topography. Simons discussed intensity of use regulation
options. V. Reid raised concern that the proposal brings Woodridge Church out of
compliance. Simons asked if traffic control could be regulated with an application. Finke
provided an example at one of the City's golf courses.
Verbick felt the multiplier option is contradictory and the building/fire code has a built in
regulation. Parking was also discussed. R. Reid asked if anyone had an issue with 500
sanctuary seating. Finke stated that First Apostolic Church had a concern and he would
contact them.
The Commission appeared to be in consensus that square footage is better to regulate than the
number of people (occupancy).
Simons pointed out that he is alright with something smaller than 50,000 square feet. This is an
activity that we're guiding out. Allowing a church to expand is a concern to him.
7
Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes
Nielsen felt that the regulation should start with the footprint size. The Commission discussed
intensity. Simons felt the Commission should look at maximum square footage. Finke
explained there are other ways to break up massing. He said it's the floor area.
V. Reid asked if Medina has buildings of 50,000 square feet of floor area. Finke explained the
intensity of use is very different from an institutional use.
Ann Kuntz of Station 19 Architects, project manager, stated if the City regulated the total
number of people at one time, Woodridge Church would exceed the proposed regulation,
which would mean they could not add onto the building based on number of people. Finke
clarified that the church would have to make other shifts in services and times to provide all
the activities they may want to offer so that they wouldn't exceed the maximum occupancy.
He explained there are a number of properties with more than 50,000 square feet of floor area
in the RR district.
The Commission concluded that they agree on the following:
• Arterial roadways are appropriate
• Floor area should be a maximum of 45,000 square feet
• Sanctuary seating to be a maximum of 500 seats
Simons said he prefers, if using a ratio, it be 2-2.5 or 45,000 square feet if it's floor area. He
prefers something lesser if possible.
Adams raised concern that the Commission was comfortable with allowing the existing churches
to expand.
Public Hearing closed at 11:03 p.m.
Motion by Verbick, seconded by V. Reid to approve the Ordinance with recommended
changes to arterial roadways, reducing the footprint to 45,000 square feet, utilizing a
multiplier closer to 2.5, adding LID language, and researching renting of church buildings.
Motion carried unanimously (absent Nolan).
9. Public Hearing: Zoning Map Amendment — Rezone the following parcels to Rural
Public/Semi-Public:
a. PID#22-118-23-24-0004 — 2052 County Road 24 (Medina City Hall)
b. PID#23-118-23-23-0001 —1500 County Road 24 (Woodridge Church)
c. PID#27-118-23-23-0008 — 2300 Cox Trail (First Apostolic Lutheran Church)
Finke presented the application.
Public hearing opened at 11:05 p.m.
No public comment
8
Medina Planning Commission Draft April 14, 2009 Meeting Minutes
Public hearing closed at 11:07 p.m.
Motion by V. Reid, seconded by Verbick to approve the rezoning and map amendment.
Motion carried unanimously (absent Nolan).
9. Adjourn: Motion by Verbick, seconded by Simons to adjourn at 11:09 p.m. Motion
carried unanimously (absent Nolan).
9
A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Dusty Finke, Associate Planner
DATE: May 6, 2009
MEETING: May 12, 2009 Planning Commission
SUBJ: Wranglers Bar and Restaurant — Preliminary/Final Plat; Site Plan Review
32 Hamel Road (PIDs 12-118-23-41-0012, 12-118-23-41-0014, 12-118-23-41-0013)
Summary
David and Jim Willis (dba DW Holding Inc.) have applied for approval of a Preliminary and
Final Plat as well as a Site Plan Review for the property referenced above. The applicants intend
to operate a bar and restaurant in the existing building at 32 Hamel Road, previously occupied by
the Provenance art/antique store (see location map below).
In order to provide parking for the use, and also to add mechanical/cooler equipment and a trash
enclosure, the applicant proposes to combine the 32 Hamel Road parcel with two surrounding
parcels.
The Uptown Hamel district requires a Site Plan Review for an expansion of parking lot of this
size. The ordinance also requires a Site Plan Review for a change in the use of the property to a
more intensive use. The applicant has not proposed to alter the existing structure to the point
which would require a formal land use approval of the building. Instead, the Site Plan Review
relates to the parking lot and the expansion of equipment for the more intensive use.
Staff recommends approval of both requests, with the recommended conditions at the end of this
staff report.
Review Deadline
Original Application Received: December 15, 2008
Complete Application Received: April 29, 2009
60-day Review Deadline (Site Plan): June 28, 2009
120-day Review Deadline (Plat): August 27, 2009
Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 1 of 9
Plat and Site Plan Review
May 12, 2009
Planning Commission Meeting
A
Preliminary and Final Plat
The applicant proposes to combine the three existing parcels into one lot (see below). The
existing lots are 0.08, 0.23, and 0.38 acres in size, for a total area of 29,960 square feet (0.688
acre). The City has supported the combination of small lots in the Uptown Hamel area, where
possible, because of the increased difficulty of redeveloping small sites.
The properties are all zoned Uptown Hamel, and are guided Uptown Hamel in the 2000-2020
Comprehensive Plan. The City's draft 2010-2030 Comp Plan update identifies the parcels as
Mixed Use -Business. Within the Uptown Hamel concept plan, the two larger lots are identified
for a future high -density residential use. The Mixed Use -Business land use, after the 2010-2030
Comp Plan is approved, also has a high priority for residential development. Staff notes that
combining these lots with the commercial use may reduce the opportunity to achieve residential
development. However, the lot combination leaves approximately half of the property vacant.
The applicant has identified this area for future development or expansion. Under the current
UH zoning, staff would strongly recommend a residential component with that future
development. Depending on future rezoning to either Uptown Hame1-1 or Uptown Hame1-2,
residential development may be required with future development.
The only structure is located on the smallest lot (32 Hamel Road), and is 1900 square feet in size.
There are two existing curb cut accesses to Hamel Road, one on the western side of the western
lot, and the other in the "tail" of the rear lot.
LEGEND
Lot Lines for
Proposed Lot
Lot Lines proposed
to be removed
�_007 Pictome
tional Corp.
Wranglers Bar and Restaurant
Plat and Site Plan Review
Page 2 of 9
May 12, 2009
Planning Commission Meeting
Ordinance Compliance
The properties are currently zoned Uptown Hamel (UH). The table below summarizes the
required lot standards for the district (Section 834) and what is proposed for the combined lot.
Uptown Hamel Requirement
Proposed Lot
Lot Size
No Minimum
29,960 square feet
Lot Width
No Minimum ,
155 feet
Minimum Front Setback
None
11.9 feet
Maximum Front Setback
10 feet
11.9 feet
Minimum Side Setbacks
None (if no doors or windows)
8 feet (if openings)
0.51 feet (east, no doors)
96 feet (west, with door)
Minimum Rear Setback
12 feet
166 feet
Maximum Impervious Surface
90%
13.8% (as existing today)
The lot created as a result of the proposed combination meets the lot standards of the UH district,
with the exception of the maximum front setback regulation. The structure already exists in the
location today, and the applicant is not proposing an action which will increase the non-
conformity of the building. In fact, staff is recommending that the applicant dedicate a 10-foot
drainage and utility easement across the front of the lot. After this dedication, the building
would be only 1.9 feet from the easement line but still 11.9 feet from the front property line.
The City established a maximum front setback in Uptown Hamel in order to implement the
vision of a pedestrian friendly, mixed use town center. New buildings are required to abide by
the maximum setback requirement in order to achieve this goal. Since the applicant is not
proposing to increase the non -conformity, and because staff is recommending dedication of
easements, staff recommends approval of the lot combination.
Wetlands/Floodplains/Easements
The three properties do not have any wetland areas, and are not within a floodplain.
Staff is recommending standard drainage and utility easements that are common practice with
plats; 10 feet along right-of-way and 5 feet along interior lot lines. Because of the proximity of
the existing building to the east property line, staff does not recommend easements in this area.
Right-of-wav and Access
The City has 66-feet of right-of-way dedicated in front of the subject lots, and the City Engineer
is not recommending additional dedication. The recent Hamel Road reconstruction utilized the
existing right-of-way. The lot, if combined, has frontage on Hamel Road, and the particular
access point would be reviewed as part of a site plan.
Criteria for Reviewing Plats
According to Section 820.21 of the City Code, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or
final plat based on one or a combination of the following findings:
(a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city.
As noted above, staff believes the lot combination is consistent with the City s policy that
smaller lots in the Uptown Hamel area be combined when possible. Staff has noted that
Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 3 of 9 May 12, 2009
Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
the existing building exceeds the maximum front yard setback. However, because the non-
conformity is not proposed to increase, staff recommends approval of the combination.
(b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography,
vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that
the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated.
Staff believes the combination does not raise concerns in these areas:
(c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not
meet minimum lot size standards.
As noted above, staff believes the lot combination meets ordinance standards, with- the
exception of the front setback exceeding the 10 foot maximum. Because the non -conformity
is not proposed to increase, staff recommends approval of the combination.
(d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause
substantial environmental damage.
Staff does not believe the combination will cause environmental concerns.
(e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious
public health problems.
Staff does not believe the combination will cause health concerns.
(f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or
private streets, easements or right-of-way.
Staff does not believe the combination will conflict, with the condition that drainage and
utility easements be provided.
Site Plan Review
The Uptown Hamel zoning ordinance requires a Site Plan Review in this situation because of the
following factors: 1) proposed change in use to a more intensive use -in this case from retail to
bar/restaurant; 2) increase in parking of more than 4 spaces; and 3) change in topography.
The purpose of a Site Plan Review is "to determine whether it is consistent with the requirements
of this ordinance, including the applicable development standards and the purpose of the zoning
district in which the property is located. Following the review, the planning commission shall
recommend that the site plan be approved, approved with conditions or denied."
Proposed Use •
The applicant proposes a bar and restaurant, which are both permitted uses in the UH zoning
district. The applicant will need to stay current with liquor licensing requirements, which staff
has noted as a recommended condition. No outdoor seating area is proposed at this time. The
UH zoning district allows an area no more than 200 square feet in size. Staff has recommended
some conditions to regulate this potential use should it ever arise.
As discussed above in relation to the plat, staff has noted that the concept plan in the existing UH
ordinance identifies two of the lots which are proposed to be combined as a future High Density
housing. Future new construction may be required to include a residential component,
Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 4 of 9 May 12, 2009
Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
depending on the zoning district regulations in place at that time. Staff recommends that this fact
be recognized in the resolution for Site Plan approval, so that the information is available for all
interested parties.
Site Plan
The proposed site plan is below, and full plans are attached. A parking lot is proposed behind
the existing structure, with a driveway accessing off of Hamel Road. The western half of the lot
is proposed to be vacant. This area is meant to either sell off for another building site (after it is
re -subdivided), or the applicants may expand their building in the future.
Lot/Setback and Building Size Requirements
Following is a summary of the requirements of the UH district and what is proposed on the site
plan. The applicant does not propose to alter the existing structure, so the circumstances are not
Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 5 of 9
Plat and Site Plan Review
May 12, 2009
Planning Commission Meeting
proposed to change. Staff has also noted the setbacks for the proposed enclosure for mechanical
equipment and garbage.
Uptown Hamel
Requirement
Existing
Structure
Proposed
Enclosure
Minimum Front Setback
None
11.9 feet
N/A
Maximum Front Setback
10 feet
' "., ��
N/A
Minimum Side Setback
None
8 feet if window/door
East - 0.51 feet (no doors)
West - 96 feet (w/ door)
East - 39 feet
West - 94 feet
Minimum Rear Setback
12 feet
166 feet
141 feet
Maximum Building Size
20,000 square feet
1,900 square feet
N/A
Max. Impervious Surface
90%
39.2% (parcel)
39.2% (parcel)
As discussed above in relation to the plat, the existing building exceeds the maximum front
setback. The applicant is not proposing to increase this non -conformity, so staff recommends
approval of the Site Plan Review, while recognizing the non -conformity.
Building Design Standards
The existing structure, because the exterior is not proposed to be significantly altered, is not part
of this Site Plan Review. Staff wished to note that generally, the structure is consistent with the
requirements of the UH district. The exterior building material is fiber cement siding (hardi
board). While this is not listed as a permitted exterior material, it is high quality and durable.
The ordinance requires a porch or overhang a minimum of six feet in width. The building has an
overhang on the front which is less then 6 feet in width as required by the UH district, yet does
go towards the architectural design elements sought by the ordinance.
Landscaping
The UH district requires at least 5% of the site to be plaza or landscaped. Landscaping shall
consist of a combination of decorative deciduous and coniferous trees, shrubs, flowers, ground
covers and rain gardens. The Tree Preservation ordinance applies to the application. The
applicant proposes to remove two trees, which is allowed in the ordinance.
The proposed landscaping is limited. The applicant proposes to plant three overstory Hackberry
trees and a decorative Serviceberry. The site currently has 12 existing shrubs in the front of the
building. The UH ordinance does not require a specific number of trees or shrubs. The
commercial ordinance recently adopted by the City requires one tree per 50 feet of site perimeter
and one shrub per 30 feet. If the property was zoned commercial, approximately 12 trees and 20
shrubs would be required. Staff recognizes that UH property is significantly different from the
commercial districts, so the same requirements should not be used. Nonetheless, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission consider additional plantings, especially adjacent to
the parking lot. Staff does not recommend requiring significant landscaping on the western half
of the property, because it would have to be removed when that portion of the lot is developed.
Parking/Circulation/Loading
The applicant proposes 12 parking stalls behind the existing building. The bar and restaurant is
proposed to have 35 seats, and the parking ordinance requires 12 parking stalls.
Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 6 of 9 May 12, 2009
Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
The UH district does not include a minimum parking setback. However, if the City requires a 5-
foot drainage and utility easement along the eastern property line, staff recommends that the
parking lot be setback at least this distance. The UH ordinance disallows parking in front of a
building, and the proposed site plan is consistent with this requirement.
The UH ordinance requires 3% (in this case, 165 square feet) of the parking lot area to be
landscaped. Currently, no landscaping is proposed in the parking lot. Since there is only one
row of parking, and because staff believes the parking lot will likely be expanded to the west
when future construction occurs, staff believes there will more opportunity to provide
landscaping when the parking lot is expanded. For that reason, staff is recommending a
condition requiring landscaping in the parking lot when it is further expanded.
In terms of pedestrian circulation, the building is proposed to have an entrance/exit on both the
front and rear of the building. Without the rear door, staff would have recommended a sidewalk
to circulate customers from the parking lot to the front of the building.
Staff believes the loading capabilities of the site are a concern. A delivery truck or garbage truck
would not be able to turn around in the rear of the building, and would block a number of the
parking stalls during service. The applicant has stated that Randy's sanitation reviewed the site
plan and did not raise concerns and that food and liquor deliveries would be outside of business
hours and could be accommodated in the driveway and parking lot. The UH district does not
require loading docks, because of the constraints on the property in the district. However, staff
recommends a condition that loading and deliveries not impact traffic on Hamel Road.
Site Drainne/Stormwater/Grading
The property was part of the Uptown Hamel stormwater improvements. The site was designed
to contain most of the run-off over the parking lot and into a stormwater pipe on the north side of
the property. From there, the water is piped to the pond in Stormwater Nature Area.
Engineering noted the north end of the parking lot should be re -designed to ensure positive
drainage. Approximately 350 cubic yards of dirt is proposed to be removed from the site in
order to grade the site, and an addition 300 cubic yards of sub -grade for the parking lot.
Utilities
Public Works and Engineering reviewed the proposed utility plan and provided comments,
which are added as a condition of approval. The applicant will run a new water service to the
building for a fire sprinkling system. The applicant will be required to pay necessary sewer and
water connection fees as described by the fee schedule for this intensity of use.
Lighting
The applicant proposes two fixtures to light the parking lot. One fixture is proposed in the
middle of the parking lot on a 12 foot pole. The second fixture is proposed near the rear building
entrance/exit. The lighting ordinance (Section 829) allows a maximum of 0.8 Foot Candle (FC)
of light at the property line, and 0.2 FC after the business closes. Staff has recommended a
condition that specific photometric details be provided in order to ensure compliance with the
lighting ordinance.
Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 7 of 9 May 12, 2009
Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
Recclin2 and Trash Facilities; Mechanical Equipment
The UH district requires that all facilities for recycling and trash be kept inside the principal
buildings or within a completely screened area. If a completely screened area is used it must 1)
be architecturally compatible with and made of the same or better material used on the principal
building, and 2) meet the architectural and development standards of the district.
The applicant has proposed an enclosure adjacent to the building for the mechanical equipment,
and the bar cooler. The applicant has also proposed a fence to screen the trash/recycling
facilities. The enclosure walls are proposed to be eight feet tall, with hardiboard siding,
consistent with the existing building. The applicant has proposed wrought iron gates for the
mechanical/cooler enclosure (facing east). The trash and recycling screening fence is proposed
to be six feet in height, constructed of cedar with.a cedar gate (facing north). Staff recommends
a wall with hardiboard siding for screening the trash and recycling area instead of a cedar fence.
This is more compatible with the building, and is more durable with less maintenance. Staff
would support the use of a cedar gate.
Staff also recommends the following conditions: 1) the trash enclosure shall be large enough for
both trash and recycling containers, and 2) the enclosures shall be tall enough to screen all
dumpsters and equipment.
Low Impact Development
The proposed site plan does not include low impact development (LID) best management
practices. As noted above, the proposal utilizes the stormwater improvements in the area, which
the property was assessed for in 2006.
Staff has noted that the parking lot could be designed in a way to direct run-off to the west and
then through a vegetative swale before heading into the stormwater pipe as an LID practice.
However, because staff believes this site will change when the western half develops, it may be
more effective to implement LID practices upon future development, which will be able to
reduce the impact of that additional hardcover as well.
Staff Recommendation
The Planning Commission will need to hold a Public Hearing, which was published in the City's
newspaper and sent to neighbors within 350 feet. Staff recommends approval of the Plat and
Site Plan Review with the following conditions:
Preliminary and Final Plat
1. The plat shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements adjacent to the north and
south property lines, and 5-foot easements adjacent to the east and west property lines.
No easements shall be required for the south 40 feet of the eastern property line;
2. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the City Attorney with regards to title
documentation;
3. The final plat shall be filed with Hennepin County Recorder within 120 days of the date
of the city council resolution granting final approval or the final plat shall be considered
void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Applicant and
approved by the city council; and
Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 8 of 9 May 12, 2009
Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
4. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the preliminary and final plat and related documents.
Site Plan Review
1. This Site Plan Review approval shall be subject to the recording of the Plat of Hamel
Commons;
2. The Applicant acknowledges that City ordinances have identified a residential use for
portions of the property and that future new construction or development may be required
to provide residential units, consistent with the ordinance requirements in place at the
time of such construction or development;
3. The Applicant shall provide additional landscaping, especially adjacent to proposed
parking lot and also to screen the equipment and trash enclosure;
4. Proposed trees and shrubs shall be diverse, with no more than 25% of a single species;
5. In the event the parking lot is expanded in the future, landscaping shall be required within
the parking lot, consistent with the requirements of the City Code;
6. The parking lot shall be set back a minimum of five feet from the eastern property line,
and located outside of any drainage and utility easements;
7. The Applicant shall be responsible to ensure that loading, deliveries, and garbage services
do not impact traffic on Hamel Road. In the event the City determines that traffic is
impacted, the Applicant shall be required to construct necessary loading areas;
8. The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the City Engineer review letter dated
April 24, 2009;
9. The Applicant shall submit photometric details for the proposed lighting which shall be
in compliance with the requirements of the lighting ordinance;
10. Sufficient area shall be provided in the trash enclosure to contain both trash and recycling
containers;
11. The east and west walls of the trash/recycling enclosure shall be constructed with
hardiboard siding, consistent with the existing structure;
12. The proposed enclosure shall be of sufficient height to fully screen the dumpsters in
trash/recycling area, the mechanical equipment, the bar cooler;
13. The Applicant shall obtain written approval from adjacent property owners and from the
railroad in order to complete the proposed improvements which extend off of the
Property;
14. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed District; and
15. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the Site Plan Review.
Attachments
1. City Engineer review letter dated April 24, 2009
2. Applicant Narrative
3. Wrangler's Menu
4. Photos of the exterior of the existing building
5. Preliminary Plat and. Civil Site Plan received April 14, 2009
6. Final Plat received April 14, 2009
7. Architectural Plans received April 29, 2009
Wranglers Bar and Restaurant Page 9 of 9 May 12, 2009
Plat and Site Plan Review Planning Commission Meeting
2335Highway 36w
St. Paul, mmssu3
nge1*a6-4600
nmss1'm6-1szz
rwmmmestmp.com
�������� n�
roo
Mr. Dusty Finke
Associate Planner
City ofMedina
2O53County Road 24
Medina, p4N5GJ4O-Q79O
Re: 32Mamel Road —Wrangfers Restaurant
City ofMedina
Dear Dusty,
KVehave reviewed the plans for the proposed site revisions for arestaurant located at 32
Medina Road. We have the following comments with regards toengineering matters,
° The plat does not show o proposed drainage and utility easement along the east
property line adjacent to the existing building. Normally,� the [dx would require
easements along all lot lines. Hmxever,inthis case, the building lies less than 1'fronn
the property line, soaneasement may not berequired.
* All proposed easements should be shown on the Preliminary Plat (Sheet C3.01).
° All parking stalls should be2Q'deep.
p The applicant should note that as part of the Hamel Road reconstruct project, a S'
wide paver sidewalk will beinstalled along the length nfthe property, The walk will
be sloped at 2% towards the street and be placed at the back of the curb east of the
existing driveway and behind a5'boulevard west ofthe existing driveway.
* Grading is shown on the property to the east and north. Proof mfthe ability to
complete this work, such 8yawritten agreement with the adjacent property owners,
should besubmitted bothe City,
" It does not appear that the northernmost area of the parking lots will drain well to the
proposed catch basin. The applicant should consider installing another catch basin at
the northwest corner ofthe parking lot,
" The proposed storm sewer lies partially onrailroad hgh . The applicant should
meet all railroad requirements A'e. permits, etc.\for this work, and copies should be
submitted tothe City prior hoapproval.
° The proposed pavement section should match that recommended in the geotechnical
report.
* Public Works should review the proposed utility service connection locations.
° The proposed curb and gutter should terminate at the north edge of the City sidewalk
and not extend through the driveway apron. The existing surmountable curb should
bemaintained across the driveway entrance.
Ifyou have any questions please feel free hocontact nneat/6S1l8O4-4894.
Sincerely,
BONESIROO
Darren Amundsen
Cc: Tom Kellogg
Wranglers
April 8, 2009
City of Medina
Dear Council Members:
Wrangler's is looking to get approved to open a new restaurant/bar in the Uptown Hamel area in the old
Providence Antique Shop. We have purchased that property the one directly behind and the property to
the west. We are asking the City to let us join these three pieces of property together so we can add a
parking lot, beer cooler, new mechanical and dumpster area. The new restaurant will be a medium
priced facility seating approx 35 specialized in serving high quality food and beverages (we have
attached a copy of the menu for your viewing). We will also be offering entertainment such as pool
tables, video games, pull tabs, live music, DJ and karaoke. The theme of the restaurant will be western
in nature as we are hoping to fit into the surrounding old town Hamel atmosphere. We our committed to
making this a fun and enjoyable place that anyone can come into and have a good meal and a good
time.
in closing we are excited about bringing a new business to the area and looking forward to a long a
prosperous relationship with the City and the surrounding communities.
Sincerely,
David Willis and James Willis
Owner/Proprietors
Appaflzarg
tefaveers frasof eti! franeA Atlas
1/2 &Wet
feel sappy
6f/ra,feers fresh etif adon Rings l fresd ad orlon and Band dipped Jn Beer Balla')
1/2 6asgat
fweeBaslst
Warngeers lUJngs year diold, $affaBet, earBeeae, Jamadian of POaln
MozzaretVa Sllx
Waaeye fingers
SampBer POaffai !Wings, Mx Abrgars and Union Rings
Saftdwlclag
ffof ffam and edaase
PofJBBy edease Slea4
1/206' glover ewada file way you 0* if
Addlllokal toppings eilooss
Baeem
lstbiaw d lomat
a do&
ffof Dago Sandwleol Topped wild Pappars and M
frasd Jfaelan &visage
Petrol Tenderteobt SandwlcA'
N/aBBaya sandalled
Meows
fried edldflen Donna,
1/# eAlx
1/2 elf&
10anggers goof TandeMoln &las'appad wild oar Aasr/oks Pepparrorn Saada
Amigo 8ear gaff rrad Srlrlrryp
Hand 8affered WaiVoya Pula
/Wets Plalfer
edkeen and MO,* Almelo PBalfar
5.....`.dsx...._.
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
Site Deve
for
IS
Medina5 Minn sota
Presented oyo
Dk Hoding G.
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
DEVELOPER/OWNER CIVIL ENGINEER
DW HOLDING INC. MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES
5515 GLACIER LANE N. 14800 28TH AVENUE, SUITE 140
PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
TEL: 763-923-4878 TEL 763-476-6010
CONTACT: J131 WILLIS FAX 763-476-0532
CONTACT: GAVE NASH
SURVEYOR
MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES
14000 28TH AVENUE, SUITE 140
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
TEL 763-476-6010
FAX 763-476-6532
CONTACT: HENRY NELSON
SHEET INDEX
SHEET
DESCRIPTION
C1.01
TITLE SHEET
C2.01
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
C3.01
PRELIMINARY MAT
C4.01
SITE PLAN
Cent
GRADING PIAN
C6.61
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C6.02
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
C7.01
III1L1TY PLAN
DETAILS
C9.01
LIGHTING d LANDSCAPING PLAN
MFRA
McCombs Frank Root
Associates, Inc
148C0MArI: ureNorth, SLAB 141
Pymoul • Unnasva • 5544,
phone: 763/476-6010 • fdtc 763/476-853.
webs/kr: www.mfm.con
Client
DW HOLDING, INC.
Project
WRANGLERS
RESTAURANT
Location
MEDINA, MN.
Certifications
I hereby certify that this plan, speciAcalion or report
was prepared by me or under my cited supervisor
and Mat I am a duly Licensed Professional ENGINEER
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
bomicilivak
David J. Nash
Registration No. 21836 Date: 04/14/21309
II applicable, carnal us fora wel signed Copy a Ws plan each Is
asalable upon eeeuest at McCombs Frank Roos p�+trs, Inc,
PlymoNq AlNgeca
Summary
Designed: DJN
Approved: DJN
Phase: FINAL
Drawn: DJD
Book/ Page:
Initial Issue: 04/142001
Revision History
No. Dale By Submittal/Revision
Sheet Title
TITLE SHEET
Sheet Number Revisio
C1.01
Project No. DWH1813'
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
x 1023.8 5
x 1026.5
/x 1026`3 x
x 1026.30
0,
x 1027.1
1027.6-
N27P
x 10363'
x 1028.8
x 1029.8
x 1029.0
x 1029.2
x 1027.0
x 1026.4
x 1024.5
x 1026.
THE SUBSURFACE UTILRY NFORMADON SHOWN ON THESE PLANSS A UTILETY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING
TO THE GUIDELINES DE CMSCE 36-02. TRLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF TASTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA..
THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION DF ALL MISTING OLDIES BEFORE COMMENCING WOPJL BY
CONTACIWG THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MIFBIESOTM. THE CONTRACTOR ANDIOB SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FILLY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AIM ALL DAMAGES. WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL
MUTES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
A£1021 SI
F INNo.13
x 1028.
--PROTECT
STREET
UGHT
---,6`1019.8
1024.7 Z
t�
,26 elB �` 0reaq290
Q
x 101.86,
\
x 1025.3
Ai•
EMOVE SPRUCE` x was
EMOVE DEAD SPRUCEL__
O 35'wW
OUTDOOR
-FRP,.
MAP
.9 oJa.
'r
x 1027.9
3.1 \� `-A`
x 1022.2
1021.9
RGi013
IGT011.
\F0�
1ID
1027.8
0
/
42.
LEGEND
PROPOSED
•
EDSTING
CURB & GUTTER
STORM SEWER O LY •^••^^^^•®
SANITARYSEWER->SKN-•O
FORCEMAIN (SAN.) 0-> FFI>-Q Q--”"--- )
WATERMAN ►i I -$' ^ I C
EASEMENT
DRAINTILE -»DTI»
GAS UNE UD ML
ELECTRIC tic LTT
TELEPHONE UT E"t
SPOT ELEVATION 95X 5 96125
CONTOUR f02-------A02------
GRADING NOTES
A PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO MESHED SURFACE ELEVATION. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPOSED CURB DENOTE GUTTER GRADE
B. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT1E SUBSURFACE MIME WFORMAT10NSHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A DENNY DUALITY LEVEL O.
THIS MALTY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF WASCE 38.021M ED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE
COLLECTION AND DEMOTION OF OEM SUBSURFACE WREN DATA.. THE CONTRACTOR MOTOR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETER /11F
THE MGT LOCATION OfALL DUSTSNG minas BEFORE COMMENCING WORN BY CONTACTING PE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER
STATE ONE FOR MINEDRA AT 14510.252.1185T. THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSMLE FOR
ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MGM BE OCCASIONED BYRD OR HER FAILURE TO EMMY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANVAND ALL
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
T SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL MISTING MURES WHICH CONFLICT Mm THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PUNS.
C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES BURINS THE
CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF MIS PROJECT. THE CONRNCTORWRL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT
PROPERTES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OEM PROJECT.
D. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: N ACCORDANCE WM1 GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTOR PRACTICER. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE
SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMMONS ON THEN/5 SITE MUMS SAFETY OF ALL PDISON5 AND PROPERTY DURG
PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK THE REQUIREMENT WEL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOM E UNITED TO NORMAL WORIUNG HOURS THE
DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE S NOT
INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW TITRE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE
E THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETETHE SINE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WIIHT:HE REQUDEMENFS OF THE DMUS
_ SOILS ENGINEER ALL SOIL TESTING MULL BE COMPLETED MINE OWNERS S0ES ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR CDORONATWG ALL /TOURED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.
F. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BAST A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED MIRE STREET AND PARKA'S AREA SUGRADE THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEMAXTE TRUCK WITH AGROSS WEIGHT Of25 TONS. THE TEST ROUSTS SHALL BE AT THE
DWECTION TITHE SOBS ENGINEER THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET DR PARTING AREA ARE
UNSTABLE CORRECTIONS TI THE SUBGRAOE SOBS SHALL BE COMPLETED INACCORDANCE MTH THE REOUIREMEMS UTNE SOILS
ENGINEER
G. THE CONTACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARWCADES,
WINNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, RAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC
CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE IAMNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS.
M. THE TREES ANTI OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND/OR ADJACENT TOME PROJECT ARE OFMK COiCERNTD THE
CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS AND SHALL BE A RESTRICTED AREA HE WILL BE REQUITED TO PROTECT THE TREES WHICH ARE TO BE SAVED
TO BE SURE THAT THE MUIPIAENT ISNOT NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND SHALL DERCSE WEAR DAIMON IN
WORKING ADJACENT TO TREES. SHOULD ANY PORTION Of METRE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE
CONTRACTORS EMMERT. HE SHALL OBTAIN THE SEMMCES OF A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRIIMWG SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES PRIOR TO
THE BEGINNING OF OPERATION SHOULD THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS RESULT W THE BREMONG OF ANY LIMBS, THE BROKEN LAB3S
SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS STALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE TOTHETREE NO
TREES SHALL BE RELDVED MOUT AUTHOMMIBN BY THE ENGINEER COSTS FOR TRRAAWG SERVICES SHALL BE GONSBEDED
INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND IIC SPECIAL PAYMENT LULL BE MADE
RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL INCLUDE ALL DESIGNATED TREED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION LONE ALL VEDETATON
WHIN THE RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL REMAIN
CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT ALL GRADING ANTI CONSTRUCTION ASSUMES TO AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS AGENCIES WITHIN
THE CONSTRUCTION LWY BE RESTRICTED TO NARROWER WIDTH INTHE HELD TO SAVE ADDRIONAL TREES AS DWECTED WPM OWNER
ACTNmES PROHMnFD OUFSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARIES MIRO INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE UNDID TO: SOIL AND CIDER
MATERIAL STOCKPILING, EQWPMENE OR MACHINERY STORAGE, DRMNG OF ANY VEHICLE, LEAKAGE OR SPILLAGE OF ANY WASHOUT. OR
OTHER TOM MATERIAL THE COLLECTION OF OTHER DEBRIS AND SOIL SFOCKPUNG WILL BE W AN AREA DETERMINED ONSTTE BYRE
EADNEER
ALL RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL BE FENDED OFFWIIN BRIGHT ORANGE POLYETHYLENE SAFE -WHETTING AND STEEL STAKES AS SHOWN ON
THE TREE PROTECTION DETAIL AT NO TIME MALL THIS FENCING BE REMOVED OR ACTMIY OF ANY MND TAKE RACE MAD! IT. FWD
PLACEMENT OPALL PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE COMPLETE BEFORE ANY WORK COMMENCES OHSITE
BEFORE COMMENCING WITH ANY EXCAVATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL PREPARATORY WORK REGARDING TREE REMOVAL
ROOT MINTING, TREE PRUNING AND STUMP REMOVAL TO THE SATISFACTION TITHE OWNER
PREPARATORY WORK SHALL HVCLUBE THE FOLLOWING AND SHALL BE COMPLETED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPER/MON OF THE OWI.YSU'S
REPRESENTATIVE
1. TREE REMOVAL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FELL THETREES AT NO TIME SHALL TREES BE BUMMED OUT, BUT SHALL BE CUT
DOWN AND STUMPS REMOVED SEPARATELY. PRIOR TO THE MUDD OF ALL TREES PROPER REMOVAL O A MIRROR OR ALL OF
THE CANOPY SHALL BE COMPETED SO THATTREES IN THE RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL NOT BE NWRED N THE PROCESS
2. ROOT PRIDEM BEFORE ANY STUMPS ME TO BE REMOVED, ALL ROOTS SHALL BE SEVERED FROM ROOTS MIRE RESIN I tD
AREAS BY SAW CURING wmK AVERNIER DESIGNED TOR ROOT PRUNNG, BY HANG, OR MN A CHANSAW. TREE ROOTS
PROJECTING NOD THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE SHALL BE EIPOSED PRIOR TO ROOT FRONDS WITH SMALL MAQONERY, I E..,
BOBCAT.
3. SUMP REMOVAL AT SUCH TIME THAT ROOTS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY SEVERED. STUMPS MAY BE REMOVED. WHERE RMCNAL
OF CERTAIN STUMPS COULD CAUSE OAM GETO COSTING PROTECTED TREES, TREE STUMPS SHALL BE GROUND OUT. ALL
STUMP REMOVAL SHALL BE UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE
4. TREE PRUNING: PROPER PROS%OF TREES/ THE RESTRICTED ZONE SHALL BE DIRECTED RYANB SUPERVISION AT ARMES
DYNE OWNERS REPRESENTATWE
AN OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIFFS DURING THE PREPARATORY ANTI CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
MULCH RATHER THAN SEED OR SOD WILL BE USED ATTRE BASE O QUALITY TREES TO PERIMETER DETERMIED BY THE OWNERS
FLEPRESENTATNE AREAS TO BE SEEDED FOR EROSION COMRDL PURPOSES WITHIN THE CONSTRICTION ZONE ARE TO BE DETERBPED BY
THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATNE NATURAL GROUND COVER WILL BE MAINTAINED WHEREVER POSSMLE.
THE USE OF RETAINING WALLS NEAR TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE REM, BASED ON TREE LOCATIONS AM TOPOGRAPHY:
L IFRYE CONTRACTOR EADOUMERS ANY DRAW TILE WHIN THE SRE. HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGWEER WITH THE LOCATION ME,
IWERT AND FTHE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN ALE SHALL BE BACIKHLLED WRHOM REVIEW, DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL Hem
THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
0
10
20
40
SCALE IN FEET: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
FRA
y ,.,
McCombs Frank Rom
Associates, Inc
1480028fhAvenue North, Swzi 14+
PWouth • Aewaso(a • 5544
p1N1rx:763/478.3010• Axc 763/47665/
websde: wwwinf2.con
Client
DW HOLDING, INC.
Project
WRANGLERS
RESTAURANT
Location
MEDINA, MN.
Certification
I hereby certify that This plan, spedRGatlM or report
was prepared by me or under my (Erect supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional ENGINEER
Under the laws of the Slate of Minnesota
b
DavldJ.Nash
Registration No. 21836 Date: 04/14/2009
It macaw, con!. os fora vM Honed emyMlBE plan each Is
available upon request at McCombs Frank Rom Associates, Mc.,
Plymouth, MN ales
Summary
Designed: DJN
Approved: DJN
Phase: FINAL
Drawn: DJD
Book / Page:
Initial Issue: 04/142009
Revision History
No. Date By Submittal /Rovision
Sheet Title
GRADING PLAN
Sheet Number Revisiol
C5e01
m IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY OMEN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER MR THE LOCATION SINE, INVERT AID
IF NE TILE LINE S ACTIVE NO ACTIVE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE 6ACYJBLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
Project No. DWH1813t
Ma,
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
x 1023.6 SS
z 1026.1
x 1026.5
1027.6'_-
x 1026.30
0
x 1027.1
7P
E.e.Toot
0 PTO:12-71
:MPIS sr Nuys7-007
PAUL/S ST MARIE RA,
1019.8
� r02r y
IE mroiG
,H27.0+1o2 •.o _.
/• 7a �6
1
�) .•
x 1026.6 •
=- -
1021.9
x 100
r-
IN
LmeIT
1eII.22(NET
Laps.Ts(sp
0 10 20
40
,,,..,
INI:11IN111
SCALE IN FEET: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
DISTURBED AREA ACREAGE SUMMARY
In ACRES
PAVEMENT AREA
0.21 ACs
EXISTING BUILDING AREA
0.04 AC±
SODED AREA
C112 AC-.4
TOTAL DISTURBED
0.33 ACs
REFER TO SHEET C5.02 FOR GENERAL NOTES,
MAINTENANCE NOTES, AND
STANDARD DETAILS
LEGEND
CURB & GUTTER
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
FORCEMAIN (SM.)
WATERMAIN
EASEMENT
DRAINTILE
GAS UNE
ELECTRIC
TELEPHONE
SPOT ELEVATION
CONTOUR
SILT FENCE
PROPOSED
EXISTING
-» -11 0 NO •-
0->F14>--C1
I--} 1
->>OT»-
Uc
DE
Ur
$625
X
902
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 1 O IPl
TEMPORARY STONE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ........
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
PHASE I:
1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES.
NT
111:
UT-
962.5
X
4102
2. CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES ON THE SITE.
3. HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO PERFORM INSPECTION OF BMPs.
GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH
ENGINEER AND ALL GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION.
4. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE
5. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE.
6. START CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURES.
PHASE II:
1. TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS.
2. INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS.
3. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.
4. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING.
5. PAVE SITE
6. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES.
7. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING.
B. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS STABILIZED), IF REQUIRED
BY THE CONTRACT
NOTE TO GONTRACTDR: n����®g¢�m'"�ynffi�n� �
THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE
NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDMONAL OR
MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FLUNG THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE
SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE
OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE
SWPPP NARRATIVE.
SOIL EROSION / SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE
CeaamurneeaaAeaa
APT
MAT
Aw
m
(114111.144
NOTE: CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE
McCombs Frank Root
Associates, Inc
1480028tilAvenue Nalh, 9tle 74(
lienourh • Minnesota • 5544,
phone: 763/476-6010• far 7133/476-853.
VWbsie: www.Mra.con
Client
DW HOLDING, INC.
Project
WRANGLERS
RESTAURANT
Location
MEDINA, MN.
Certification
I hereby mit* that this plan, speddcaeon or report
was prepared by me or under my (Urea supervision
and lhat I am a duty licensed Professional ENGINEER
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
David J. Nash
Registration No. 21835 Date:004/2000
II applicable, contact us for a wel•igned copy MOTs plan which is
available upon request at McCombs FrzNCReus Assodoes, Inc,
PlymoWl. MNcam
Summary
Designed: DJN
Approved: DJN
Phase: FINAL
MOM: DJD
Book / Page;
Initial issue: 04/142009
Revision History
No. Date Bg Submittal / Revision
Sheet Title
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN
Sheet Number Revision
R
THE SUBSURFACE INERT INFORMATION SHOWN ONTHESE PLANS IS UTILITY OUALRY LEVEL 0. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINER ACCORDING
TO THE GUIDELINES OF CIWSCE 38-02, TRIO •STA19AR0 GUDEMNES FOR THE COLLECTION ANO DEPICTION OF GUSTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA..
THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCDNRIACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL DUSTING unLmm BEFORE COMMENCING WORK HT
CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE DNE FOR MNNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR ANO/oR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FIALY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AMP ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FALURE TO EXACTLYLOGATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL
TERRIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAR).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILEWRHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOON THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION. SIZE, INVERT AND
IF THE TILE LINENACTIVE NO ACTNE MANTLE SHALL BE}MONELLEO% MOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINER.
C6.01
Project No. QWH18139
e
NEEMMEME
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
N
�`
j( \cc
r \�c<
r
«
--- \
ii.1
CONNECT TO
EXISTING STORM MN
W/ CORE DRILL & BOOT
IE=1017.95
EXTEND SANITARY SERVICE
36 LF 4° SCHEDULE 40 ® 2.0%
B5 LF
6" FIRE SERVICE
6"-90° BEND
CONNECT TO EXISTING
WATER SERVICE -
VERIFY 2" PIPE SIZE,
LOCATION, & CONDITION
CONNECT TO EXISTING
SANITARY SERVICE -
VERIFY 4" PIPE SIZE,
LOCATION, INVERT,
& CONDITION
MINIMUM SLOPE =2%
CONNECT TO EX "
6" WATERMAIN
�'�VLLONG SLEEVE
c
n
•
<
0
Itl
Ili
rl;
11(
1r'
I
OnNFR PIEU MPLS STTPAU�150p72 RR
�0 rl
!
• 111
,N%in; ._
11
THE SUBSURFACE Ufalt'/ INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A DENNY QUALIFY LEVEL D. me DUALTY LEVEL WAS DETERh1NED ACCORDING
TO THE GUIDELINES OF CMSCE38-02, TIRED!STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AK) DEPICTION OF GUSTING SUBSURFACE UNLIIY DATA"
THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL BUSTING DRUPES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK BY
5 CONTACTING TIE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR! M1ESmN. THE CONDUCTOR AAO/DR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY
RESIN/BIBLE FOR /WAND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH FIGHT BE OCCASIONED INNIS DR HER FAME TD EYACTLY LOCATE ANO PRESERVE ANY AND ALL
VARIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SDP, M URANO
IF THE TILE LINE a ALIVE ND ACTIVE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACNFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROIA THE PROJECT ENGINEER
<
R[ 10}L1'
IE 101493
«
`C
1
cJ
«
«
_- 69 LF 12" HDPE
c 0 4.75%
:I,
Cr
co
F
.......+'�c
a:
WAT INV=1019.5 ® !ADC
SAN MAX INV=1022r4
WAT INV=1019.5 ® BLDG 4
REMOVE 2.3' EX WATER SERVICA
U •� 9 4
t • •d;;t i;1114L:• iii.SIIjLJ• /1
k_0
REMO/VE 9.8. EX SAN. SERVICE
''ICM
r
�r
c
<
W
co
CB 1
LOW POINT CASTING (SEE DETAIL)
RE=1024.23
IE=1021.23
SUMP=1020.23
W1000N
nREPu¢
/
r
<
c
«
<-
RE r01S9a
K 1011.)9'
Aa,
I
I
I
I
)
I
i
i
I
I
I
RE101a92
1E1010.270E)
ID 100a.Ts(9/v4
1
LEGEND
CURB 8 GUTTER
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
FORCEMAIN (SAN.)
WATERMAIN
EASEMENT
DRAINRLE
GAS LINE
ELECTRIC
TELEPHONE
PROPOSED EXISTING
->>-11 O ss
>-00
ipp- I -110.
-»oT»
UG
UE
UT
UTILITMCH STR� UCTINNTTES
1.0 St
Ua
..-... Ion -.....
lOt
A. THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STANDARD
UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS' AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT
AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS.
1. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TO COY REQUIREMENTS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP
WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE
CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE
THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPACTOR
3. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN
(BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS.
B. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIRCATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN.
1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CRY. -
2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE 4° SCHEDULE 40, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
3. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE PVC C-900 W/ POLY WRAP, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, WRH 7.5 FEET
MINIMUM COVER
4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HOPE, AND RUBBER GASKETS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. IF USED, RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn/DOT CLASS 3.
C. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE,
EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING URLRY ENTRANCE
LOCATIONS.
D. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING (M RIES AS
SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE,
MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BONG FACT OR COMPLETE.
THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION
TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTIUTIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO
RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILTIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, BY CAWNG GOPHER STATE ONE
CALL AT 454-0002
E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT
PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE COMPACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION
PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.
F. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE
CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING
SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY
CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE OUP( OF THE ENGINEER OR THE
DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO
INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE
CONSTRUCTION SITE.
G. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE
RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 61NCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SOD.
J.
K.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFHC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS
BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF
TRAFHC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS.
ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE
OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE
UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS
WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.
A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY:
COMPANY: NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
ADDRESS: 6588141ST AVE NW RAMSEY, MN 55303
PHONE: 763.433.9175
DATED: TBD
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THIS SOILS REPORT.
PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND PARKING AREA
SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25
TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN
AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE
STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER
THE TREES AND OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND/OR ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT ARE OF
PRIME CONCERN TO THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS. HE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE TREES WHICH ARE
TO BE SAVED TO BE SURE THAT EQUIPMENT IS NOT NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND SHALL
EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN WORKING ADJACENT TO TREES. SHOULD ANYPORTION OFTHE TREE BRANCHES
REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT, HE SHALL OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF
A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE OPERATION.
SHOULD THE CONTRACTORS' OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS, THE BROKEN LIMBS SHOULD
BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MIMMQE ANY DAMAGE. COSTS FOR
TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION AND NO SPECIAL
PAYMENT WILL BE MADE.
MFRA
McCombs frank Roo:
Associates, Inc
146W28thAvenue North, & Loob 14
Phm oath • Afry eso6.5544
phone: 7631476.6010• far 763/476.853
uebsde: wwwmfracor
Client
DW HOLDING, INC.
Project
WRANGLERS
RESTAURANT
Location
MEDINA, MN.
Certification
I hereby certify that this plan, specter:don or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and tall am a duly licensed Professional ENGINEER
under the laws of the Slate of Mi nesola.
David 3. Nash
Registration No. 21836 Date: 04/14/2009
II applicable, contact us By a wa1 slated copy of Dis plat with H
av llabla upon lequect al McCombs Frank Roes Asn:1.4;1w,
Plymouth, Means
Summary
Designed: DIN
Approved: DJN
Phase: FINAL
Drawn: CID
Book / Page:
Initial Issue: 04/142009
Revision History
No. Date By Submittal/Revision
Sheet Title
UTILITY PLAN
Sheet Number Revision
G7.Q1
10
20
40
SCALE IN FEET: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
Project No, OW1118139
"
N O N M E N D M I N E E R I M I N M I E N V E
E n g i n l e e n n g " P l a n n i n g " S u n r e y i n c
L a n d s c a p e S c h e d u l e . , ��, . � o ����. �� 0 1 V O I . ����. ���� . . , 1 . 2 1 . . w 2 1 . M M I I 1 M , . 4 a ��, , ��8 ��. , . . . i t <