The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About2017-04-06 packet Capital Area Metropolitan ,1� Planning Organization Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457 Technical Committee Thursday,April 6,2017 at 10:00 A.M. Meeting Location:Boone/Bancroft Room#200,John G.Christy Municipal Building 320 E.McCarty,Jefferson City,MO 65101 -Enter through Main Lobby Tentative Agenda Presentation: Capital Eclipse Presentation by Ms.Diane Gillespie,Jefferson City Convention and Visitors Bureau 1. Call to order,roll call,and determination of a quorum 2. Public comment 3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended 4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of March 2,2017 5. Communications received 6. Old Business A. FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program Development Action Requested: Discussion and recommendation to the Board of Directors. Staff Report: Work has begun on the Fiscal Year 2018 Unified Planning Work Program. Changes include priorities for 2018, major tasks completed in 2017, updates of tasks to be completed for each of the five work tasks,and financial data. B. Project Selection for Surface Transportation Program(STP)Funds Action Requested: Review staff's prioritization of project applications and recommendation to the Board of Directors. Staff Report: Review and discussion of the prioritization of project applications for the remaining unobligated STP funds. Staff will forward a list of projects following the prioritization process. C. 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program Development Action Requested: Discussion and recommendation to the Board of Directors. Staff Report: Work of the Program Year 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) has begun. Changes include the introduction of performance measures, a section on environmental justice, and clarification of the responsibilities of the Technical Committee and the Board of Directors. Projects and fiscal constraint tables have been updated,please verify these are correct.MoDOT and OATS projects have been added. 7. New Business A. Proposed Amendment to the 2017-2021 Transportation Improvement Program: Purchase of two paratransit vehicles Action Requested: Review,discussion,and recommendation to the Board of Directors. Staff Report: JEFFTRAN is to purchase two E450 Elkhart Coach II, Floor Plan CC Handi-Wheels buses equipped with Apollo 5 camera systems. They will be using Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 funds to make this purchase. This project was listed in the Program of Projects in the Transportation Improvement Program. 8. Other Business A. Status of current work tasks B. Member Updates 9. Next Meeting Date-Thursday,May 4,2017 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room 10. Adjournment Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call(573)634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. MINUTES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION March 2,2017 VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT Cole County: Larry Benz Eric Landwehr Holts Summit: Mark Tate Jefferson City: David Bange,Vice Chairman JJ Gates Mark Mehmert Katrina Williams,Designee for Alex Rotenberry Sonny Sanders,Chairman Britt Smith MoDOT: Bob Lynch Mike Henderson Wardsville: David Elliott VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT Paul Winkelmann,Callaway County Matt Morasch,Jefferson City Steve Engelbrecht,MoDOT Cary Maloney,Pedestrian or Biking Interest Joe Scheppers,Private Transportation Interest EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT Enos Han,Federal Highway Administration EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT Jeremiah Shuler,Federal Transit Administration STAFF PRESENT(Non-Voting) Anne Stratman,Administrative Assistant, City of Jefferson 1. Call to order,roll call,and determination of a quorum Mr. Sanders called the meeting to order at 10:04 a.m. and asked Ms. Stratman to call roll. A quorum of 12 voting members or their designee was present. 2. Public comment None received. 3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended Mr.Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed unanimously. 4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of February 2,2017 Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of February 2,2017 as printed. The motion passed unanimously. 5. Communications from the presiding officer No correspondence was received. 6. Old Business A. FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program Development Mr. Sanders explained that work has begun on the Fiscal Year 2018 Unified Planning Work Program which runs from November 1, 2017 to October 31, 2018. He stated that changes include priorities for FY2018, major tasks completed in FY2017, and updates of tasks to be completed for each of the five work tasks. Mr. Sanders explained that financial data is forthcoming.He stated that this is for informational purposes only and no action is necessary. Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee March 2, 2017 Page 2 B. Surface Transportation Program (STP)Small Urban Sub Allocation Balance Mr. Sanders explained that the Surface Transportation Program(STP)promotes flexibility in state and local transportation decisions and provides flexible funding to best address state and local transportation needs. He stated that the remaining unobligated STP balance is in the amount of$93,658.26. Mr. Sanders explained that the funds must be obligated by September 30,2019. Mr.Benz suggested using the funds for the Clark Avenue/Dunklin Street interchange. Mr. Landwehr commented that the Clark Avenue interchange is a City/County high priority now that the Lafayette interchange is complete. He explained that site distance is a challenge turning off of the exit ramps onto Clark Avenue. He suggested combining the STP funds with MoDOT's Cost Share Program. Mr. Landwehr also suggested looking at the intersection coming from the north between Route W and the Missouri River Bridge. He stated that there needs to be three lanes on Highway 54 from the Missouri River Bridge to the Highway 63 interchange. Mr. Lynch explained that any funds used for the MoDOT Cost Share Program needs to be new money. He clarified that STP funds cannot be used for the Cost Share Program. Mr. Smith stated that the STP funds would be best used for a traffic study to determine the needs at the Clark Avenue intersection. Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Benz seconded to have a call for projects and the deadline shall be determined by CAMPO Staff such that a decision can be made for the use of the STP funds at the April 6,2017 CAMPO Technical Committee meeting.The motion passed unanimously. 7. New Business A. 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)Development Mr. Sanders explained that work of the Program Year 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) has begun. He stated that changes include the introduction of performance measures, a section on environmental justice, and clarification of the responsibilities of the Technical Committee and the Board of Directors. Mr. Sanders explained that projects and fiscal constraint tables have been updated. He requested that the jurisdictions review their projects and financial details. Mr. Sanders explained that the proposed scheduled is to start the public comment period at the May 17, 2017 Board of Directors with the public hearing scheduled for the June 21,2017 Board of Directors meeting. 8. Other Business A. Status of current work tasks • Visioning and Travel Demand Model update. The request for qualifications ended on February 3, 2017. The selection committee will meet in March to go through applications and interview qualified consultants. • Work has been completed on the update of the current land use to support the Metropolitan Transportation Plan development and travel demand modeling. • JEFFTRAN System-Wide Assessment. The JEFFTRAN System-Wide Assessment, conducted by the Lochmueller Group,will begin in March. Meeting with various departmental staff and drivers on March 7 and 8. The Consultants will return the week of March 27 to conduct bus counts,meet with stakeholders,and conduct an open house. B. Member Updates Cole County --Mr.Benz gave a report on the Columbia Regional Airport Expansion project. --Mr.Landwehr gave an update on road projects throughout the County. Holts Summit --Mr. Tate gave an update on the North Greenway/Pro-Foods Project and the Halifax Realignment Project. Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee March 2, 2017 Page 3 Jefferson City --Mr. Bange gave an update on the following projects: (1) Stadium Boulevard/Jefferson Street project; (2) Capitol Avenue sidewalks and curb/gutter project; (3) Wayfinding Signage project; and (4) Development Agreement with Helias High School for work on Myrtle Street between Stadium Boulevard and Linden Drive. --Mr. Gates gave updates on the following: (1)Wellness Recreation Center; (2) greenway trail section underneath Highway 179;and(3)Parks Master Plan Update. --Mr. Mehmert gave updates on the following: (1) JEFFTRAN System-Wide Assessment; (2) Transit Title VI update;(3)Transit Triennial Review;and(4)Transit DBE Report. --Mr. Smith gave an update on the annual overlay project, Parking Demand Study for the downtown core and RFQ process for a Planning Consultant for work at the Airport. Missouri Department of Transportation --Mr.Henderson gave an update on the Transportation Improvement Program Amendment process. --Mr.Lynch gave an update on the 2018-2020 Pavement Projects and 2018-2020 Bridge Projects. Mr. Gates left at 10:41 a.m. 8. Next Meeting Date-Thursday,April 6,2017 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room. 9. Adjournment Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Mehmert seconded to adjourn the meeting at 11:16 a.m. The motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Anne Stratman,Administrative Assistant Unified Planning Work Program FY 2018 November 1, 2017 to October 31, 2018 Adopted XXXXXXXXXXX _-...e, �. _ ^ T 1 i v .1, n - f 41 634 - -. --..' _— i, -'r------T-ioipi—T- j— , . _ . „ y----- = .6' _ 1 1 pip . , 4 ..,_ , fi • „y 1. . s r t Highlights indicate information to be changed Underlines indicate changes made CAMP A Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation,Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration,or the Missouri Department of Transportation. Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Agenda Item 6A CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits of,or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the grounds of race,color,sex,age,disability or national origin,in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987(P.L. 100.259). Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson Department of Planning and Protective Services Room 120 John G.Christy Municipal Building 320 East McCarty St.,Jefferson City,Missouri 65101 Phone: (573)634-6410 Fax: (573)634-6457 http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo Table of Contents Introduction 1 Challenges and Priorities 1 Transportation Planning Factors 2 Financial Support for CAMPO 2 Major Tasks Completed in FY 2017 3 Tasks Carried Over from FY 2017 3 Public Participation 3 UPWP Development 3 Work Element 1 -Program Support&Administration 4 Work Element 2-General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination 5 Work Element 3 -Long Range Transportation Planning 6 Work Element 4- Short Range Transportation Planning&Programming 7 Work Element 5 -Public Transportation Planning 8 Appendix A—Financial Summary 9 Section 1—Anticipated Expenditures 9 Section 2—Anticipated Revenue 10 Appendix B—MPO Boundary Map 11 I Introduction The Fiscal Year 2018 Unified Planning Work Program(UPWP)has been prepared to define the tasks and anticipate funding requirements as part for the work program for the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO). This document serves to define activities for all public officials and agencies that contribute resources to the transportation planning process. The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) covers one fiscal year, a period from November 1 to October 31 of each year, and outlines the program of transportation planning activities to be funded through the Consolidated Planning Grant and local funds. It also serves as a management tool for scheduling, budgeting, and monitoring the planning activities of the participating agencies and governments and serves as the basis for funding agreements with the Missouri Department of Transportation(MoDOT). CAMPO is the official Federal and State recognized Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of the Jefferson City urbanized area and the surrounding planning area. The CAMPO planning area includes a southern portion of Callaway County, northeastern portion of Cole County, cities of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, Lake Mykee, St. Martins, Taos, and Wardsville. CAMPO is responsible for transportation planning and transportation projects in a continuing, cooperative and comprehensive manner. CAMPO Staff,unless otherwise identified,performs all work. CAMPO is comprised of a Board of Directors composed of elected and appointed officials from local jurisdictions, selected state agencies, and Federal transportation representatives serving as ex-officio members; and a Technical Committee that consists of representatives from member agencies' professional staffs and acts in an advisory capacity. A memorandum of understanding between members identifies the City of Jefferson as the administrator of CAMPO, and as such, provides staffing for CAMPO. For FY 2018,the City of Jefferson will provide staff consisting of three full time transportation planners. The City also provides part time support from the Director of Planning and Protective Services and an Administrative Assistant. Challenges and Priorities The biggest challenge facing state and local transportation agencies responsible for the surface transportation system and public transit systems is finding sufficient and reliable sources of funding operations,maintaining existing systems, and implementing projects of new capacity. More fuel efficient cars and fewer vehicle miles travelled, combined with the federal fuel tax not being raised since 1997,has caused the Federal Highway Trust Fund to become insolvent and require support from general revenue fund infusions to cover shortfalls. Similar challenges are occurring at the state level. Missouri has the 46th lowest state gas tax, at $0.173 per gallon' in the nation and was last raised in 1996. According to the Missouri Public Transit Association, Missouri ranks 44 of 50 in public transportation funding, with 9 cents per capita being spent to fund public transportation. Another challenge in the CAMPO region is the ability to provide transportation alternatives to private vehicle ownership. Many low income or disabled citizens aren't able to drive private vehicles and rely on public transportation,walking, or biking as their primary mode of transportation. 1 American Petroleum Institute,State Motor Fuel Taxes, November, 2016. http://cdn.api.org/pdf/state-taxes/missouri.pdf Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 1 Staff priorities and areas of emphasis for FY 2018 include: • Increase and improve transit planning support to local transit providers. • Begin implementation of FAST Act performance measures and targets. • Continue Metropolitan Transportation Plan update activities including continuing public participation — visioning, goals, and objectives; incorporation of performance measures; and travel demand model update activities. Transportation Planning Factors The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), passed into law in 2015, identifies the following planning factors required for consideration in any MPO planning activities, including in the development of the UPWP, Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), and Transportation Improvement Program(TIP): (A) support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area,especially by enabling global competitiveness,productivity, and efficiency; (B) increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; (C) increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; (D) increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight; (E) protect and enhance the environment,promote energy conservation,improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns; (F) enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight; (G) promote efficient system management and operation; (H) emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system; (I) improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and (J) enhance travel and tourism. Financial Support for CAMPO Designation as an MPO allows CAMPO to be the recipient of metropolitan planning funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) of the US Department of Transportation(DOT) through the Missouri Department of Transportation(MoDOT). Financial support to CAMPO consists of 80% federal funding through the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) (consisting of FHWA Planning (PL) funds in the amount of$171,447 and FTA 5303 funds in the amount of$35,116), federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds in the amount of$96,000, and 20% in local funding provided by the City of Jefferson and Cole County. Total federal funding is 302,563 and total local funding is $75,641. The CAMPO total budget for FY2018 is $378,204. This budget includes $120,000 appropriated from the FY2017 budget due to delays initiating professional services contracts. Appendix A provides more details financial details. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 2 Major Tasks Completed in FY 2017 There were a number of projects completed by staff, consultants, or both during FY 2017. • The JEFFTRAN system-wide assessment was completed by a consultant with assistance from JEFFTRAN, City of Jefferson Public Works, and CAMPO staff. • While the Capital Area Pedestrian& Bicycle Plan was completed in 2016, CAMPO staff worked in 2017 with regional jurisdictions to customize implementation strategies and adopt the plan. • The Title VI Program was updated and adopted. • A periodic review of the Public Participation Plan was completed. • CAMPO collaborated with the Mid-Missouri Regional Planning Commission to update the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan. Tasks Carried Over from FY 2017 The Long Range Transportation Goals and Vision and the Travel Demand Model/List of Recommended Improvements have been combined into one professional services contract which began mid-2017 and may be reappropriated into 2018. Developing performance measures and targets, from Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning, is anticipated to commence in FY2018 due to the final statewide and metropolitan planning final rules not being published until May 2016. MoDOT has 18 months from the publishing of the FHWA finals rules to have their measures in place and CAMPO has an additionial 6 months from then. Public Participation Federal law requires CAMPO to develop a public involvement program to involve the community early and continuously in the transportation planning process. A proactive public program which provides information, timely public notice, and public access to key decisions is included in the Public Participation Plan. During the development of the 2018 UPWP, the UPWP is scheduled to be discussed at monthly Board of Directors and Technical Committee meetings from February to June, and concludes with a public comment period. Draft copies of the UPWP as part of the meeting agendas and meeting minutes regarding UPWP development are available to view on the CAMPO website. UPWP Development This UPWP was developed following the guidelines found Chapter II Metropolitan Transportation Planning, Appendix A, and Appendix B of FTA C 8100.1C, 9/1/2008. CAMPO staff reviewed previous years' time required for activities to determine time allocations for this UPWP. CAMPO is administered by the City of Jefferson Planning and Protective Services Department. Because of this fact, CAMPO accommodates the city's budgeting process/schedule and execution of the CPG and must begin the development of the UPWP several months prior to the fiscal year for which the UPWP covers and present a draft to the Board of Directors a few months prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. This early start presents difficulties in assuming future tasks which may surface after adoption of the UPWP and in documenting activities occurring in the previous year. The UPWP can be modified two ways; through a modification in the `scope of work' which allows for changes in tasks to be performed, or through an amendment process, which also allows for a change in tasks, but with changes in the total amount of reimbursement agreed upon between the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission and CAMPO. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 3 Work Element 1 - Program Support & Administration Purpose The Program Support & Administration task covers the activities necessary to carry out the daily activities of CAMPO in support of the transportation planning process. These include meeting preparation, UPWP development, public outreach activities, reporting, and professional development activities. Accomplishments during Previous Work Program Period Board of Directors and Technical Committee monthly meetings were held,with a few cancellations in FY 2017. The UPWP, quarterly progress reports, Annual Listing of Obligated Projects, DBE Commitments Semi-Annual reports. and other required reporting documents were produced in a timely manner. Staff participated in various professional development activities, including MoDOT sponsored events, webinars, and other training opportunities. Additionally, the Title VI program was updated in accordance with FTA rules. Staff evaluated the effectiveness of the public participation process. Objectives/Activities • Manage CAMPO activities in order to comply with Federal and State administrative requirements and guidance. Support the operations of the Board of Directors and Technical Committee, communicate and coordinate with Federal and State agencies on MPO activities, and support day to day operations. • Develop the annual budget and Unified Planning Work Program along with the preparation and submittal of UPWP quarterly progress reports, billings, and invoices. Modify UPWP as needed and approval from the necessary authority. • Conduct public participation such as public meetings,hearings and workshops, as needed and in accordance with the Public Participation Plan. Provide access to CAMPO activities through maintenance and updating of the CAMPO website. • Fulfill reporting requirements related to Title VI, Disadvantage Business Enterprise requirements,project obligation, and other topics as required. • Professional Development activities, including attendance at relevant training sessions, educational seminars, meetings, and conferences. Products for FY 2018 • Board of Directors and Technical Committee meetings. • Meeting agendas,minutes,presentations,reports, and other support material. • FY 2019 UPWP. • End of year report, quarterly progress reports,billings, and invoices. • Annual List of Obligated Projects from the previous program year. • DBE Commitments Semi-Annual reports. • Participation in professional development activities. Responsible Parties • CAMPO staff. Funding Sources • Local Match Funds$11,258 (20%),Federal CPG Funds $45,031 (80%). Planning Factors Addressed • A-J. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 4 Work Element 2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination Purpose Not all of the CAMPO member organizations have planning staff or current comprehensive planning documents in place. In order to facilitate transportation planning by incorporating the vision and goals for the member organizations and the public, CAMPO will provide assistance in the crafting of the transportation component of local comprehensive planning documents, as practical. This task may include the development and maintenance of related spatial and non-spatial data collection and analysis; examples include land use, demographic data, housing, human services, environmental/natural resources, recreation/open space, and public facilities. Accomplishments during Previous Work Program Period Provided technical assistance in various grant application processes for transportation related projects with in the CAMPO area. CAMPO staff also provided pro bono publico services such as: participation in the development of local comprehensive plans of member organizations, provided GIS analysis/data (elevations, demographic, sidewalk, bicycle facilities, street ROW, etc.) to support development, and grant application activities. In preparation of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan, staff has created community profiles for the jurisdictions in the CAMPO region. Staff has updated the current land use GIS database for Cole and Callaway Counties. Objectives/Activities • Provide technical planning assistance to CAMPO members in the development of the transportation component of comprehensive and other planning documents, including GIS support and databases. • Assist jurisdictions in the acquisition and use of GIS and other data for use in plans, transportation grant applications,measuring performance, and forecasting provided by the US Census,MoDOT and others. Products for FY 2018 • Various inputs for comprehensive planning documents-ongoing for multiple years. • Various GIS databases. • Continue providing technical assistance for the transportation component of local planning documents. Responsible Parties • CAMPO staff supports local jurisdictions in the development of their plans, but the local jurisdictions have ultimate responsibility for the development and publishing of their planning documents. Funding Sources • Local Match Funds $8,782 (20%),Federal STP Funds $35,127(80%) Planning Factors Addressed • A,E, G, I and J. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 5 Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning Purpose This work provides for long range transportation planning activities, studies, and plans supporting the transportation planning process out to a minimum of 20 years, for the CAMPO metropolitan planning area, and may include both system level planning activities and project level activities. Accomplishments during Previous Work Program Period Staff conducted public participation activities involving key stakeholder, business community, advocacy groups, environmental organizations, and the public in long range transportation planning activities to achieve the community's long-term transportation goals and vision for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Staff commenced the travel demand model project. Staff and a consultant began visioning and updating the travel demand model and list of recommended improvements. Staff, working with MoDOT, began setting federal performance measures for the TIP and MTP. Objectives/Activities • Keep the MTP current by maintaining and amending components of the plan such as major land use changes, major road changes, process improvements, funding, or new regulations and legislation; and any projects to be included into the TIP that are not already listed in the MTP. • Involve key stakeholders, business community and advocacy groups, environmental organizations, and the public in long range transportation planning activities to achieve the long-term transportation goals and vision of the MTP. • Report MPO performance targets in relation to performance measures for the MTP and TIP. • Continue the update process of visioning, as well as the Travel Demand Model and subsequent transportation study to identify areas with a low level of service and provide recommended improvements to these areas. Products for FY 2018 • Vision, goals and perhaps strategies derived from a regional stakeholder and public involvement exercise. • Amendments to the MTP as necessary. • Report MTP and TIP performance measures and targets. • Complete work on the visioning and Travel Demand Model and List of Recommended improvements. Responsible Parties • CAMPO staff. • Visioning/goals and Travel Demand Model/Study-Consultant Funding Sources • Local Match Funds $13,259 (20%),Federal CPG Funds $53,037 (80%) (staff) • Local Match Funds$24,000(20%),Federal STP Funds$96,000(80%)(consultant) Planning Factors Addressed • A-J. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 6 Work Element 4 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming Purpose To identify and address immediate or short term transportation needs which may include non-motorized planning activities, freight planning, bicycle/pedestrian planning transportation, safety planning, operations and management planning,transportation security planning, or wayfinding activities. Accomplishments during Previous Work Program Period Participated in activities, meetings and conferences including Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety — Central Region and STIP project review/discussions. Completed Program Year 2018 — 2022 Transportation Improvement Program(TIP). Objectives/Activities • Provide support for short range transportation planning by CAMPO and its members. • Participate in regional activities regarding freight, safety, security, bicycle/pedestrian, non- motorized, and other related planning activities. • Maintain the current TIP through the Amendment and Administrative Modifications process that meets statutory requirements, maintain fiscal constrain, and support changing sponsor priorities and project scope. • Develop the new Program Year 2019—2023 TIP. Products for FY 2018 • TIP amendments and administrative modifications as necessary. • Program Year 2019—2023 TIP. Responsible Parties • CAMPO staff. Funding Sources • Local Match Funds $7,750 (20%),Federal CPG Funds $31,000 (80%) (CAMPO Staff). Planning Factors Addressed • A-J. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 7 Work Element 5 - Public Transportation Planning Purpose To assist public transportation and transit providers in fulfilling State,Local, and Federal requirements for coordination and cooperative transportation planning through assistance with plan development,technical assistance,mapping, data, and GIS functions. Accomplishments during Previous Work Program Period Staff provided assistance with the JEFFTRAN Title VI plan and updated the JEFFTRAN Route and Schedule Guide. Staff assisted the consultant led system-wide assessment of JEFFTRAN. Staff updated the Coordinated Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan. Staff participated in the JEFFTRAN Automatic Vehicle Location, Automatic Voice Annunciation, and Automatic Passenger County System vendor selection process. Staff supported JEFFTRAN staff during their triannual review. Objectives/Activities • Continue to assist JEFFTRAN with the maintaining the Route and Schedule Guide, individual route maps and other tools to serve JEFFTRAN patrons. • Provide JEFFTRAN mapping, demographic, GIS, planning and other technical assistance in support of reporting requirements and evaluating possible changes in types of transit services offered. • Participate in Mid-Missouri Transportation Coordination Council and mobility management activities. Products for FY 2017 • Update Route and Schedule Guide. • Maps, demographics,and GIS analytics. • Improved service to patrons of JEFFTRAN. Responsible Parties • CAMPO staff. Funding Sources • Local Match Funds $10,592 (20%),Federal CPG Funds $42,368 (80%). Planning Factors Addressed • B -J. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 8 Appendix A- Financial Summary Section 1 -Anticipated Expenditures FY2018 MPO Budget* Federal-CPG Federal-STP Local Total Labor Salaries 5148,076 537,019 5185,095 Benefits 544,423 SO 511,106 555,529 Labor Subtotal $192,499 $0 $48,125 $240,624 Direct Costs Materials & Supplies Advertising $2,000 SO S500 52.500 Postage $320 SO S80 5400 Printing $100 SO $25 $125 Copies $8 SO 82 $10 Office Supplies $800 SO 5200 51.000 Food $200 SO $50 5250 Operational Supplies 51,296 S0 5324 $1,620 Subtotal $4,724 $0 $1,181 $5,905 Other Contracted Services Dues&Publications $1,200 SO $300 51,500 Training iEducation/Meeting s/Conference 57,000 SO $1,750 S8,750 Professional Services Visioning/Travel Demand Model** 596,000 $24,000 $120,000 Subtotal $8,200 $96,000 $26,050 $130,250 Utilities* Telephone SO SO $0 SO Subtotal $0 $0 $0 $0 Equipment Repair and Maintenance Vehicle Wash SO SO $O SO Maintenance Agreement $600 SO $150 S750 Subtotal $600 $0 $150 $750 Capital Purchases* Equipment/software $540 SO $135 S675 Subtotal $540 $0 $135 $675 Direct Costs Total $14,064 $96,000 $27,516 $137,580 Total Labor and Direct Costs $206,563 $96,000 $75,641 $378,204 *Numbers have been rounded to the nea rest whole number. **Reappropriated from FY 2017 Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 9 Section 2 -Anticipated Revenue Work Element Funding Summary-Consolidated Planning Grant and Local Funds Federal Federal Local Percent of Work Element Federal Local Match Total Work CPG Funds STP Funds Program 1-Program Support&Administration 80% 20% $45,031 $0 $11,258 $56,289 14.9% 2-General Development and Comprehensive Planning 80% 20% $35,127 $0 $8,782 $43,909 11.6% 3-Long Range Transportation Planning CAMPO Staff 80% 20% $53,037 $0 $13,259 $66,296 17.5% Contractual Professional Service 80% 20% $0 $96,000 $24,000 $120,000 31.7% 4-Short Range Transportation Planning&Programming 80% 20% $31,000 $0 $7,750 $38,750 10.2% 5-Public Transportation Planning 80% 20% $42,368 $0 $10,592 $52,960 14.0% Total I $206,563 $96,000 $75,641 $378,204 100% *Numbers have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 2018 Local Match by Jurisdiction Planning Funds Surface Transportation Funds Total Local Local Match Local Match Match City of Jefferson Share 75.0% $38,731 75.0% $18,000 $56,731 Cole County Share 25.0% $12,910 25.0% $6,000 $18,910 2016 UPWP Local Match $51,641 $24,000 $75,641 CAMPO Staff Sonny Sanders, Senior Transportation Planner(1.0 FTE) Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner(1.0 FTE) Alex Rotenberry, Transportation Planner(1.0 FTE) Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 10 Appendix B — MPO Boundary Map CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary Y _ Approved by the Board of Directors - tior Janua 16,2013 r January I. Lake Mykse r /` - ,_ Approved by the Governor of Missouri (0\ March 12,2013 -"°�J m j Holts 5 mmil ci 1 — oil? illil e� k�r SZ 0 el m ,ji'1 ,ziI ii4 IlrL - \ City of Jefferson ` _ r 7 Plielt:I'bk\. I Taos I I 1 , _.$ C 11 w-dsville `11` I -- (' . n r c D -1 Legend 0 Board Approved Planning Area Boundary - - Municipal BoundaI ry Bw .. ..,..,.,.....�_....w_6.,...,.....�...-,�._�., -- � Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program 11 Capital Area Metropolitan . Planning Organization y� Room 120, 320 E. McCarty St., Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573.634.6410 Fax: 573.634.6457 91/Iemoranium TO: CAMPO Technical Committee FROM: Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner DATE: April 3, 2017 SUBJECT: Surface Transportation Program Balance At the March 2, 2017 Technical Committee meeting, staff discussed the below Surface Transportation Program (STP)fund balance: Current Unobligated Available Balance $93,658.26 The Technical Committee directed staff to send out a call for projects to all CAMPO jurisdictions. The City of Jefferson submitted a project application for a traffic study at Clark Avenue and Highway 50/63 and Dunkin Street. Attached is the project application, including the scoring by staff. Staff recommends forwarding the project application for a traffic study at Clark Avenue and Highway 50/63 and Dunkin Street to the Board of Directors for approval. Funding shall not exceed $93,658.26. If you have questions or require additional information,I can be reached at 573-634-6536 or by email at kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org. Agenda Item 6B Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Application Instructions Complete the following information for projects to be selected for inclusion in the Transportation Improvement Program and return to the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization offices,fax to 573.634.6457 or email to ssanders@jeffcitymo.org Use a separate form for each project. 1. CAMPO staff shall rate each project on each of the criteria listed and be reviewed by the Technical Committee, prior to going to the Board of Directors. 2. Projects that contain program criteria shall use that program's criteria-Example: Transportation Alternatives Projects and Safe Routes to School projects will use the program's criteria Minimum Project Requirements 3. Local jurisdictions must provide the required local match. 4. Design and engineering costs must be borne by the sponsoring jurisdiction. 5. Projects must be an eligible project under the funding program identified in the cost section. 6. Public participation. Describe the public participation activities that have taken place in development of the project. 7. Complete Part 1 -General Project Information 8. Complete Part 2 -Categorical Information Project Categories 9. Select the project categories that apply to the project. Check all that apply. x Roads and Intersections Bridges Non-Motorized Transportation Regional Plans and Studies Transit _x_Other(Traffic Study and Conceptual Layout) 10. Go to Part 2 and complete the Categorical Information sheet. Provide information and data for the appropriate categories. Attach extra pages if necessary: Capital Area MPO Project Application 1 Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Application Part 1 General Project Information 1. Sponsor Contact Information(governmental body sponsoring the proposed project) Contact Person: David Bange Title: City Engineer Mailing/Street Address 320 E. McCarty Street City: Jefferson City State Missouri County: Cole Zip Code 65101 Organization Name: City of Jefferson Fax: (573) 634-6552 Telephone: (573) 634-6433 E-mail dbange@jeffcitymo.org 2. Sponsor's Signature and Title Signature indicates that the sponsoring municipality/agency agrees with the project scope and associated cost estimates, and attests that the information presented within the proposal is true and accurate,to the best of its knowledge. The sponsor also certifies that the governing body has approved the project, and sources of the matching funds have been identified and are committed to the project. Print Your Name Here: David Bange Sign Here: Title: City Engineer Date this form was completed: March 7,2017 Project information Project Name: Clark Avenue and Highway 50/63 Interchange 3. Type of Project: Check all that apply Transit x Plans/Studies Roadway—Expansion _x Intersection Improvements Roadway—Preservation ITS x Bicycle/Pedestrian Bridge Replacement/Rehab Transportation Enhancements Railway Airport/Aviation Improvements Other 4. Starting and Ending Points: (if this is a roadway project)— From— E. Atchison Street To - E. McCarty Street 5. Project description/justification: A traffic study and conceptual layout to address congestion and safety issues at the Intersection of Clark Avenue with Highway 50/63 and Dunklin Street 6. Expected starting date: _August 2017 Expected completion date: _March 2018 Capital Area MPO Project Application 2 7. Is this a multiple year project? No x Yes (one fiscal year two different calendar years) 8. Source of operating/maintenance funds for 10 years after completion: This is a traffic study and conceptual layout so there will be no need for maintenance funds. 9. Attach a project location map. Map attached? No Yes _x 10. If any agency other than the sponsoring agency is responsible for carrying out any phase of the project,please indicate responsible agency and phase. Agency Phase Agency Phase 11. Total Overall Project Cost$ 112,000 Phase Funding Program FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 agency Local Traffic City of CIP $19,000 $ $ $ $ Study Jefferson State STP $93,000 $ $ $ $ Federal $ $ $ $ $ Other $ $ $ $ $ Total $ $ $ $ $ 12. Sponsoring agency project number: (If one is assigned) Capital Area MPO Project Application 3 Project Categories for Part 2 CAMPO staff shall rate each project on each of the criteria listed and be reviewed by the Technical Committee,prior to going to the Board of Directors. Roadway and Intersection Project Description and Scoring Criteria 1. Describe the existing condition; including road cross section, crash history (the last three years) and reasons the project is being brought forward. Clark Avenue is a two lane section with left turn pockets at the intersections. The intersection of the ramp terminals from Highway 50/63 and both Elm Street and Miller Street which are immediately adjacent to the ramps are controlled by stop signs and Clark Avenue does not have any control.Given the traffic volume during the peak hours the close spacing of the ramps and side streets there is considerable congestion and safety concerns.A review of the accident data in the area reveals that from 2012 through 2014 (the last three years of data that we have available)there have been 7 accidents at the Dunklin intersection,3 at Elm Street,2 at the southern side ramps,2 at the northern ramps,5 at the Miller Street intersection and 8 at the intersection of Clark with McCarty.This intersection was studied as part of the Rex Whitton Expressway EIS study and recommendations for improvements were made including the construction of roundabouts that would incorporate the ramp terminals and the adjacent side streets. 2. Does the project provide benefits to neighborhoods with low income and minority populations? Yes_x_ No Explain. This project location is in the vicinity of two elementary schools and is the walking path for children living on the southern side of the highway. 3. Does the project improve the safety and/or the security of the transportation system? Yes_x No Explain. The traffic study and conceptual design will look to address the issues of congestion and safety. 4. Describe the proposed design improvement; including project limits, typical road cross section, multimodal components, and other improvements. Attach traffic study and conceptual project layout or preliminary design. As indicated above what is being sought is funding for a specific traffic study and a contextually specific conceptual design. The limits are assumed to be E. Atchison Street to the South and E. McCarty Street to the North.It is assumed that the study will indicated that improvements be made to the intersections of Dunidin,Elm, the ramp terminals and Miller Street. These improvements may or may not correspond to the recommendations from the Whitton Expressway EIS study which recommended roundabouts that both ends of the overpass that would accommodate the ramp terminals as well as Miller and Elm Streets. 5. Average Annual Daily Traffic(AADT vehicles/day): Clark— 10,800 Dunklin—3100 Elm—4193 Miller— 1141 Eastbound off ramp—3012 Eastbound on ramp— 1626 Westbound off ramp— 1559 Westbound on ramp -3157 6. The roadway's Federal Functional Classification: Urban Minor Arterial 7. Roadway speed limit: 30 8. Is the project identified in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan? Capital Area MPO Project Application 4 Yes x No What is its name? Clark and Highway 50 9. Explain how the project meets the goals and objectives of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan(MTP). (B) increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users We are aware of the need for this project to accommodate non-motorized users the two most notable groups are children looking to access the elementary schools on the northern side of the highway and Lincoln University Students accessing the retail establishments at the Dunkin Street Intersection. This area is also part of what is known as the Jefferson City Bike Loop and the project will nook to address these needs. (D)increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight The goal of the study will be to address the congestion and safety concerns along this corridor.A reduction in congestion will lead to increased accessibility. Accommodations such as improved sidewalks and crosswalks will create a better environment for pedestrians and other non-motorized users. (E)Protect and enhance environment,promote energy conservation,improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements... Congestion reduction relates directly to fuel savings which has both environmental and energy conservation benefits. Providing improved non-motorized enhancements provides for mode choice and provides the opportunity for improved quality of life. (H) emphasize the preservation of the existing system The project will look to maintain the access that currently exists to ensure that the existing street network can continue to play its role in the community. 10. Describe any needs for additional land acquisition,right of way or easements,particularly noting all total property takings or relocations. List the number of parcels affected. It is unknown what land acquisition may be necessary,although it is anticipated that there will be some right of way needs. 11. Are there any known environmental concerns? Yes No_x_ Explain. This area was studied as part of the Expressway EIS. 12. Is this a multi jurisdictional project? Yes_x_ No Explain. This project is located on both MoDOT and City Right of Way 13. Please provide any other information that supports or affects the project. This interchange has been determined to serve as a secondary connection to the MSP area. While development has not yet taken off the City currently has retained a consultant who is working to develop plans for the extension of a new street into the MSP site and a bill is being considered by the legislature to transfer 39 acres of property at MSP to the City which would then lead to the potential of private development in the area. This interchange also received much attention and public debate in conjunction with the request by Lincoln University to close Chestnut Street to allow for a more pedestrian orientated campus. In the view of the public this closure would direct more traffic to Clark Avenue exacerbating was already perceived as unsafe area during peak traffic times. 14. Please describe how the project takes into account the requirements and recommendations of the CAMPO Livable Streets Policy. (The policy can be found on the CAMPO website) In the conceptual layout phase of the this project alternative mode of travel particularly pedestrian and bicycle will be considered and included in the conceptual design.As stated earlier the City is aware to this area being used as a connection across the highway for both of these groups and would look to provide accommodations for them. Capital Area MPO Project Application 5 Roadway and Intersection Project Scoring Criteria Available Points Points Earned Road Classification Collector 1 Minor arterial Principal arterial or higher 3 Volume(ADT) Between 10,000 & 14,999 ADT 15,000 ADT or greater 2 Multimodal Components Pedestrian Bicycle 181 C Transit 1 Crashes An average of three, four, or five crashes of a similar type over 1 the last three years An average of six or more crashes of a similar type over the 2 last three years Goals and Objectives of the(MTP) Meets one,two, or three goals or objectives (` Meets four or more goals or objectives 0 Project is in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Q 1 Project is multi jurisdictional. 0 Is there a need for additional land acquisition,right of way or easements -Yes 0 0 _No �1 Project compliance with CAMPO Livable Streets Policy l rl Total 22 13 Additional Comments: Capital Area MPO Project Application �A �� _ _ y_�� 6 Capital Area Metropolitan . Planning Organization y� Room 120, 320 E. McCarty St., Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573.634.6410 Fax: 573.634.6457 91/Iemoranium TO: CAMPO Technical Committee FROM: Alex Rotenberry,Transportation Planner DATE: April 3, 2017 SUBJECT: 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program Update The Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which are funded by the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)and Federal Transit Administration(FTA),or are deemed'regionally significant.' The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation and local public transportation operators. Development of the 2018-2022 TIP continues. Changes for your information and comment include: • Page 3-Clarification on roles of the Technical Committee and the Board of Directors. • Page 4-A new section on environmental justice. • Page 4-5-A new section on federal performance measures. • Page 10-Update of Table 5. • Page 10-Fiscal Constraint has a forth question added concerning projects going through the local planning process. • Page 11-17-List of Fiscally Constrained Projects.Projects that end in 2017 are highlighted in yellow. If projects are programmed to continue from July 1,2017 onward,please let staff know. • Page 20-Program of projects—OATS. • Page 28-Appendix E—Definitions. Items needing addressing or review: • Addressing comments from FTA/FHWA • Update of Table 2 Programmed and Available Funds by Source is based on the list of projects listed in the draft TIP and will change as projects are updated or added. • Fiscally Constrained Projects. Please review your projects. Projects are still being added,a fresh copy of the 2018-2022 TIP will be provided on Thursday,April 3. • The map of projects has not been updated. • The JEFFTRAN Program of Projects has not been updated. • Planning Process Self Certification needs to be inserted. If you have questions or require additional information, I can be reached at 573-634-6525 or by email at arotenberry@jeffcitymo.org. Agenda Item 6C Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Transportation Improvement Program Program Years 2018 - 2022 July 1, 2017 -June 30, 2022 goo- 9a lf► icy fa ` — - •t 'li t .„` , � r +„.__ :Iketili:Lf. � • w di .r ma, CAMP A Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation.The opinions,findings,and conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of Transportation. Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits of,or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the grounds of race,color,sex,age,disability or national origin,in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987(P.L. 100.259). Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson Department of Planning and Protective Services Room 120 John G.Christy Municipal Building 320 East McCarty St.,Jefferson City,Missouri 65101 Phone:(573)634-6410 Fax:(573)634-6457 http://www.jeffersoncitymo.govicampo Table of Contents Introduction 1 Public Participation 2 Project Selection 2 TIP Development 3 TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications 3 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects 4 Air Quality Designation 4 Environmental Justice 4 Federal Performance Measures 4 Financial Plan 5 Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding 5 Operations and Maintenance—MoDOT 8 Operations and Maintenance -Local Government 8 Financial Constraint 10 Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects 11 Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects 17 Program of Projects -OATS 18 Program of Projects -JEFFTRAN 19 Multimodal Projects 19 Appendix A—Amendments and Administrative Modifications 20 Appendix B—Federal Funding Sources 21 Appendix C—Policies and Procedures 22 Appendix D—Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification 25 Appendix E—Definitions 26 (Resolution approving TIP goes here) i (CAMPO Board, TC, and staff listing goes here) ii Introduction The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization(CAMPO) is the designated metropolitan planning organization for the Jefferson City, Missouri Urbanized Area whose purpose is to carry out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive long range transportation planning process. As part of this process, in 2016, CAMPO updated the 2013-2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, a long range transportation plan addressing the current and future transportation needs for the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). The MPA includes a southern portion of Callaway County, northeastern portion of Cole County, cities of Holts Summit,Jefferson City,Lake Mykee, St. Martins, Taos,and Wardsville. CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary ' "L ' All Approved by the Board of Directors January 16,2013 e fyl�yy Laka Mykse Approved by the Governor of Missouri ROI. March 12,2013414 Al f co j Halts/Sum—mill i 1~ �. tae En 1 411111111111111,it. .* v in li Pi- l MaIt- ,_IV , .. ..,,,64. - ,,,...,,,, .......,.. .......,...„,1/4 , \,, f q 0" 1' 1 .--11'7,47.„::::',..7,t°,1° Ile S- D � : ,-- A- . pf ,u,\1 , 1 NL., ,__,4)\ .7-- , -1.0 ---) .//`L._ / 1 ,_ : 1 141•6 '< I'. 1. 1__J Taos 7 1 Wardsvillel. © \— ©J ri Legend — - 0 Board Approved Planning Area Boundary ___ r� _-- / \rTh M_ _1 Municipal Boundary % )„ — m The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be implemented within the MPA, which are funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration(FTA), or are deemed `regionally significant.' Each project or project phase included in the TIP is to be derived from the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and is part of the process of applying for funds from the FHWA and FTA. Certain capital and non-capital transportation 1 projects using funding under 23 U.S.C. and 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or regionally significant projects requiring action by the FHWA or the FTA are required to be included in the TIP. The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation and local public transportation operators. Public Participation CAMPO seeks active and meaningful involvement of the public and interested parties in the development and update of transportation plans and programs, including the TIP. All meetings of the CAMPO Technical Committee and Board of Directors are open to the public. All meeting agendas and minutes are available on the internet or upon request. CAMPO provides all interested parties and the public with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP as required by federal law. Reasonable opportunity to comment and participate on the proposed TIP is made following the policies in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan located on the CAMPO website at http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/government/long range transportation_plan/public_participation.php. The approved TIP is available for review several locations throughout the CAMPO planning area as outlined in the Public Participation Plan. JEFFTRAN is the public transit provider for the City of Jefferson and OATS, Inc. is a not-for-profit 501(c)3 corporation providing specialized transportation for senior citizens, people with disabilities and the rural general public in 87 Missouri counties. Federal Transit Administration recipients of certain categories of funds, JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. must follow a public participation plan. The FTA allows a grantee, e.g. JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc., to rely on locally adopted public participation plans for the submittal of their projects in lieu of a separate "Program of Projects" (POP) if the grantee has coordinated with CAMPO and ensured that the public is aware that the CAMPO's plan is being used to satisfy the POP public participation requirements. Both JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. meet this coordination and public awareness criteria CAMPO's Public Participation Plan satisfies the Federal Transit Administration's requirement of public participation for their"Program of Projects." Project Selection Transportation projects, funded by direct allocation of Federal funds to a project sponsor, award of Federal funds via competitive grant, or wholly funded by the sponsor, are selected by the agency having jurisdiction over the project using their own criteria and submitted to the CAMPO Board of Directors for inclusion in the TIP. Transportation projects included within the TIP should be consistent with investment strategies discussed in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Transportation projects, funded by sub-allocated Federal funds directly to CAMPO or otherwise made available for programming at the discretion of CAMPO, are selected based on competitive process approved by the CAMPO Board of Directors. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff, and review by the CAMPO Technical Committee,prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote of approval. The ranking process has unique evaluation 2 criteria for different categories of projects — roadway/intersection, bridge, non-motorized, transit, and `other.' The Technical Committee is an advisory board to the board of directors. Regardless of whether the Technical Committee recommends approval of a project, does not recommend approval of a project, or is unable to make a recommendation,the project shall still proceed to the Board of Directors to make a final decision. TIP Development The TIP is updated every year and covers a 5 year period starting July 1, 2017. TIP development begins with a verification of status of projects in the current TIP, solicitation of new projects, and request for budget information from local jurisdictions. Local transit providers are also requested to provide information needed to develop their"Program of Projects"for inclusion into the TIP. CAMPO staff,with support from the Technical Committee, MoDOT, FHWA, and FTA, develop the financial plan, project listings,maintenance and operations, and other components of the TIP. Once the draft TIP is developed, it is presented to the Technical Committee for review and recommendation to the Board of Directors. A 25 day public comment period and public hearing are held prior to the Board of Directors approval of the TIP. The Board then requests approval of the TIP by the Governor. More information about public involvement activities can be found in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan. TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications Between TIP updates, if projects need to be added,removed or changed,the TIP can be changed either by amendment or administrative modifications. Definitions of an amendment or an administrative modification, and information about public participation, notifications, and other procedures regarding amendments and administrative modifications, can be found in Appendix C —Policies and Procedures of this document. Appendix A contains a listing of amendments and administrative modifications that have occurred to this document. Previous Projects The TIP will include a listing of major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and identify any significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. Major projects are defined as transportation improvement projects receiving Federal financial assistance with an estimated total cost of $500 million or more or that have been identified by the FHWA as being a major project. No major projects were implemented, and no significant delays or projects from the previous TIP have been identified. 3 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) requires that CAMPO publish an annual listing of federally obligated projects. The Annual Listing of Projects is an index of projects which used Federal funds that were obligated in the preceding TIP program year. Obligated projects are consistent with the funding categories identified in the TIP. An obligation is the Federal government's legal commitment to pay the Federal share of a project's cost. An obligated project is one that has been authorized and funds have been obligated by a Federal agency. Obligated projects are not necessarily initiated or completed in the program year, and the amount of the obligation will not necessarily equal the total cost of the project. For Federal Transit Administration projects, obligation occurs when the FTA grant is awarded. For Federal Highway Administration projects, obligation occurs when a project agreement is executed and the State/grantee requests that the funds be obligated. CAMPO publishes the Annual Listing of Obligated Projects yearly within 90 days of the previous TIP's program year. The Annual Listing of Obligated Projects is posted on the CAMPO website at http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/government/long=range_transportation plan/campo_plans_and publicati ons.php. Air Quality Designation The United States Environmental Protection Agency has designated the CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area as being in attainment for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Small Particulate Matter(PM-2.5)Lead, and Sulfur Dioxide(SO2). Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898 requires agencies receiving federal funding to meaningfully address low-income and minority populations in their plans,programs,policies, and activities. CAMPO staff expects project sponsors to identify and mitigate any disproportionately high and adverse effects of federal transportation programs. Federal Performance Measures In the passage of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), and continuing into the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act, Congress established a performance- and outcome- based program. The purpose of this new program is for states and metropolitan planning organizations utilizing federal dollars to invest resources in projects that collectively work towards the achievement of the national goals. The legislation requires the U.S. Department of Transportation, after a lengthy and robust exchange with states, MPOs, and other public and private stakeholders, to establish performance 4 measures in these areas including safety, congestion reduction, MPO coordination, and transit/highway asset management. The TIP and other plans, such as the Metropolitan Transportation Plan, are required to include information regarding these performance measures. However, the regulations and guidance regarding the establishment and use of these performance measures have not yet been completely developed and implemented; therefore, they are not included in the 2018-2022 TIP. Future versions of the TIP will address these requirements,as rules are finalized and targets are required to be reported. Financial Plan The TIP includes a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, and indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the TIP. CAMPO, MoDOT, and public transportation operators cooperatively develop estimates of funds that are reasonably expected to be available to support TIP implementation. Only projects for which construction or operating funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be included. In developing the financial plan, CAMPO takes into account all projects and strategies funded under title 23 U.S.C., title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, and other Federal funds, and regionally significant projects that are not federally funded. For purposes of transportation operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain system-level estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways (as defined by 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation(as defined by title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53). Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding Federal funding forecasts, provided by MoDOT based on published notices in the Federal Register, estimate fiscal year authorization levels by the FHWA and FTA under the current highway act. Appendix B briefly describes most of the Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO planning area. For Federally-funded projects, the TIP must identify the appropriate "matching funds" by source. The matching funds are usually provided by state and local governments. State revenue forecasts are also provided by MoDOT based on historical data of the State Fuel Tax, State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax and General Revenue. Local revenue forecast from the County Aid Road Trust (State Fuel Tax and State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax) for each jurisdiction are based on past distributions and are assumed to continue a trend of a 2 percent inflation rate. The City of Jefferson has a 1/2 cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a 1/2 cent sales tax for Parks and Recreation, which supports greenways and other non- motorized transportation activities. The City of Jefferson has provided its own future revenue projections from these sources. Cole County has a %2 cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a real property tax levy of$0.27 earmarked for Road & Bridges. All small cities get $100,000 every five 5 years from Cole County, which comes from the aforementioned sales tax. Callaway County has a real property tax levy of$0.2466 earmarked for Road&Bridges. Outlined in Table 1 are local forecasts of revenue sources for over the life of the TIP available for transportation projects, operations and maintenance. Table 1 -Forecast Revenue for Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance. Available Local Transportation Funds Callaway County 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total County Aid Road Trust-State Fuel Tax $1,791,734 $1,827,569 $1,864,120 $1,901,403 $1,939,431 $ 9,324,258 Property Tax-Road&Bridge($0.2466 levy) $1,900,000 $1,900,000 $1,900,000 $1,900,000 $1,900,000 $ 9,500,000 Transfer from general revenue $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 Cale County $County Aid Road Trust-State Fuel Tax $1,224,143 $1,248,625 $1,273,598 $1,299,070 $1,325,051 $ 6,370,487 Sales Tax $5,030,870_$5,030,87CL $5,030,870_$5,030,870 $5,030,870 $ 25,154,350 Property Tax-Road&Bridge($0.27 levy) $3,770,847 $3,770,847 $3,770,847 $3,770,847 $3,770,847 $ 18,854,235 Motor Vehicle Sales Tax $ 331,268 $ 331,268 $ 331,268 $ 331,268 $ 331,268 $ 1,656,340 Halts Summit $ - CountyAidRoadTrust-State Fuel Tax $ 132,961 $ 135,620 $ 138,332 $ 141,099 $ 143,921 $ 691,933 Transportation Sales Tax $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ 1,560,000 Sales Tax $ 25,750 $ 26,523 $ 27,318 $ 28,138 $ 28,982 $ 136,710 Cap Imp Street Revenue $ 40,170 $ 41,375 $ 42,616 $ 43,895 $ 45,212 $ 213,268 Interest $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 42,000 NID Deposits $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 35,000 City of Jefferson $ - CountyAidRoadTrust-State Fuel Tax $1,764,033 $1,799,314 $1,835,300 $1,872,006 $1,909,446 $ 9,180,099 Sales Tax-1/2%Parks Sales Tax $4,951,878 $4,951,878 $4,951,878 $4,951,878 $4,951,878 $ 24,759,390 Sales Tax-1/2%Capital Improvement(Expires March 2022) $1,720,000 $1,720,000 $1,720,000 $1,720,000 $1,720,000 $ 8,600,000 City of Jefferson-JEFFTRAN _ $ - Passenger Fares&Misc. $ 229,889 $ 236,785 $ 243,889 $ 251,205 $ 251,205 $ 1,212,973 Sales Tax-1/2%Capital Improvement(Expires March 2022) $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 400,000 Lake Mykee $ - CountyAidRoadTrust-State Fuel Tax $ 14,332 $ 14,619 $ 14,911 $ 15,209 $ 15,513 $ 74,584 St.Martins $ - CountyAidRoadTrust-State Fuel Tax $ 46,682 $ 47,615 $ 48,568 $ 49,539 $ 50,530 $ 242,933 General Revenue Funds $ 209,733 $ 211,830 $ 213,948 $ 216,087 $ 216,087 $ 1,067,685 Sales Tax-1/2%Capital Improvement* $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 Taos $ - CountyAidRoadTrust-State Fuel Tax $ 35,953 $ 36,672 $ 37,405 $ 38,154 $ 38,917 $ 187,101_ Sales Tax-1/2%Capital Improvement* $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 Wardsvflle $ - CountyAidRoadTrust-State Fuel Tax $ 61,669 $ 62,902 $ 64,160 $ 65,443 $ 66,752 $ 320,927 Sales Tax-1/2%Capital Improvement* $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 OATS $ - PassengerFares,Misc. $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 30,000 Section 5310 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 30,000 Medicaid Transportation $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 180,000 Total Local Funds $ 121,624,273 Note:County Aid Road Trust includes State Fuel Tax,Vehicle Sales/Use Tax and Licensing Fees. CART Funds based on 2016 numbers from MoDOT.There is a conservative two(2)percent Please see more on CART funds here:http://dor.mo.gov/publicreports/index.php#motorfuel increase per year,based on historical numbers. *This is distributed from Cole County In the past, local governments have used general revenue and other sources of revenue, as they deemed appropriate to match transportation grants awarded. It is not uncommon,nor difficult, for local jurisdictions to transfer funds from one account to another at their discretion. Table 2 shows the total programmed project funds and available project funds by source. The project costs have inflation factored in by each project sponsor. The instructions on the form used to submit a project for inclusion in the TIP reminds the project sponsor to take inflation into account when estimating the project's cost. Since the last iteration of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan,the inflation factor for the TIP has been set as 3 percent. 6 Table 2-Programmed and Available Funds by Source. Programmed Funds Available Funds Federal 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total FHWA NHPP $31,200 $4,107,200 $1,730,400 $0 $0 $5,868,800 $31,200 $4,107200 $1,730,400 $0 $0 $5,868,800 FHWA HSIP $239,400 $78,300 $0 $1,757,600 $1,807,200 $3,882,500 $239,400 $78,300 $0 $1,757,600 $1,807,200 $3,882,500 FHWA SW $304,070 $47,200 $2,770,400 $1,132,000 $1,163,200 $5,416,870 $304,070 $47,200 $2,770,400 $1,132,000 $1,163,200 $5,416,870 FHWA TAP $278,564 $0 $0 $0 $0 $278,564 $278,564 $0 $0 $0 $0 $278,564 FHWA SH RP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FHWA RTP $71,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $71,000 $71,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $71,000 FTA 5307 $775,236_ $798,493 $822,448 $847,121 $872,535 $4,115,833 $775,236 $798,493 $822,448 $847,121 $872,535 $4,115,833 FTA 5310 $0 $0_ $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 FTA 5311 $0 $0.. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0_ $0 FTA 5316 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FTA 5329 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FTA 5339 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000 State MoDOT MP EN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 MoDOT Safety $4,100 $3,700 $0 $439,400 $451,800 $899,000 $4,100 $3,700 $0 $439,400 $451,800 $899,000 MoDOT State Operatin€ $7,725 $7,957 $8,195 $8,441 $8,694 $41,012 $7,725 $7,957 $8,195 $8,441 $8,694 $41,012 MoDOT SWIMB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 MoDOT TCOS $4,859,800 $47,110,350 $1,106,950 $296,750 $304,550 $53,678,400 $4,859,800 $47,110,350 $1,106,950 $296,750 $304,550 $53,678,400 Local Jefferson City $859,971 S1,285,332 $1,323,892 $1,363,609 $1,404,517 $6,237,321 $859,971 $1,285,332 $1,323,892 $1,363,609 $1,404,517 86,237,321 Cole County $0 $0 $0_ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0_ $0_ $0_ $0_ $0 Oats $0 $0 $8,000_ $0 $0 $8,000 $0 $0 $8,000 $o $0_ $8,900 Holts Summit $0 $0 $0_ $0 $0 $0_ $0 $0 $0_ $0 $0_ $0 St.Martins $0 $0 $0_ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $223,510 $230,215 $237,122 $244,235 $251,562 $1,186,644 $223,510 $230,215 $237,122 $244,235 $251,562 $1,186,644 Yearly Totals $7,654,576 $53,668,747 $8,047,407 $6,089,156 $6,264,058 $7,654,576 $53,668,747 $8,047,407 $6,089,156 $6,264,058 Total Programmed Total $81,723,944 Total Available Funds $81,723,944 7 Operations and Maintenance—MoDOT Maintenance costs include MoDOT's salaries, fringe benefits, materials and equipment needed to deliver the roadway and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as: sealing, small concrete repairs and pothole patching; mowing right of way; snow removal; replacing signs; striping; repairing guardrail; and repairing traffic signals. Performing these activities requires employees; vehicles and other machinery; facilities to house equipment and materials such as salt, asphalt and fuel. Maintenance operations expenditures are expected to increase 1%annually. This makes MoDOT's cost, $6,682 per lane mile. Calculations are $516,985,000/77,366 lane miles. Assumptions: Maintenance Operations $467,168,000 * Fleet Investments $ 22,617,000 * Facility Investments $ 7,200,000 * IS Investments $ 20,000,000 * Total $516,985,000 Lane miles 77,366 ** *Source: FY 2017 Budget Request ** Source: Official 2015 State System Mileage Operations and Maintenance-Local Government Local revenue sources for operations and maintenance include state fuel tax, state vehicles sales/use tax, local sales taxes, franchise fees, license and permit fees, property taxes, and other revenue sources that provide significant resources for local general fund and specific funding of transportation. Not all taxes and fees go to transportation, so the local jurisdiction usually will identify a budget specifically for transportation purposes, such as capital improvements, Road and Bridge funds, transit operating subsidies,road and street budgets, or operations and maintenance budgets. The operations and maintenance costs for local governments include salaries, fringe benefits, materials, and equipment needed to deliver the street and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as sealing, small concrete repairs, pothole patching, mowing, snow removal, replacing signs, striping, and repairing traffic signals. These activities may be performed in-house or outsourced. Local government operations and maintenance on federal aid roads calculated for the system wide average of operations & maintenance per centerline mile is $12,433 and $6,136 per lane mile plus 3 percent per year out to FY 2021, as determined by consultation with engineering and technical staff of the 8 local jurisdictions. Table 3 shows the various roadway types in CAMPO's MPA and the governing body that is responsible for maintenance. Table 3 -Federal Aid Road Mileage by Jurisdiction. Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Total Percent of Other Other Minor Collector Other Minor Major Total Freeway Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Collector (Jurisdiction) Express Arterial Arterial way Callaway County 2.3 2.9 0.9 6.1 2.89% Cole County 3.6 5.9 4.6 14.1 6.63% Holts Summit 3.1 4.1 0.5 7.6 3.61% City of Jefferson* 4.3 37.4 23.6 65.3 30.83% MoDOT 34.6 8.7 18.2 11.9 5.4 5.3 32.7 116.8 55.13% Lake Mykee 0.0 0.00% St. Martins 1.5 0.5 1.9 0.91% Taos 0.0 0.00% Wardsville 0.0 0.00% Total(Functional Class) 34.6 13.0 66.1 48.8 5.4 6.3 37.8 211.9 100.00% Percent(Functional Class) 16.3% 6.1% 31.2% 23.0% 2.5% 3.0% 17.8% *Includes Parks&Rec. Source:CAMPO Functional Classification GIS Database. In addition to the local government operations and maintenance previously discussed, JEFFTRAN expenses also cover fleet repair/maintenance, repairing/replacing bus shelters, bus washing, bus maintenance facilities, public restrooms, and fuel. Table 4 shows the estimated expenditures for transit operations and maintenance. Table 4 -JEFFTRAN Estimated Expenditures for Operations &Maintenance. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 FTA-Section 5307 $752,656 $775,236 $798,493 $822,448 $847,121 City of Jefferson-Local Operating Assistance $1,211,549 $1,247,895 $1,285,332 $1,323,892 $1,363,609 MoDOT-State Operating Assistance $7,500 $7,725 $7,957 $8,195 $8,441 Passenger Fares and Misc. $217,000 $223,510 $230,215 $237,122 $244,235 Total $2,188,705 $2,254,366 $2,321,997 $2,391,657 $2,463,406 Operations and Maintenance revenue and expenditures are based on the most recently available budgets and apply the inflation factor of 3 percent for FTA and City of Jefferson funding sources. Table 5 -OATS Estimated Expenditures for Operations &Maintenance. 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 FTA-Section 5316 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - FTA-Section 5310 $60,000 $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $75,000 Fares $ 4,900 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,100 $ 5,100 Local Contracts $60,000 $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $75,000 9 Financial Constraint To exhibit financial constraint, a financial plan should address four questions: 1) What will the needs for transportation in the CAMPO planning area cost? The needs are identified by project in the following section and costs are summarized by funding source in Table 1. 2) What revenues are available that can be applied to the needs? Specific revenues available to meet the needs are identified in Table 1 - Forecast Revenue for Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance,by jurisdiction and source. 3) Are the revenues sufficient to cover the costs? As shown in Table 2—Programmed and Available Funds by Source, programmed fund amounts equal anticipated fund amounts. For many jurisdictions as shown in Table 1, available funds exceed the amounts of revenues required to fund programmed projects. 10 Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects Bridge Projects NF- Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 MoDOT Funding Source Category g 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA NHPP $21,000 $4,000 $54,400 $79,400 DN Road Bridge Improvements E Name: N MoDOT TCOS $6,000 $1,000 $13,600 $20,600 TIP# 2013-05 o Local _ _ $0 WIDOW 5113015 Other $0_ Description&Location:Various types to FHWA $0 improvements to the Dix Rd.bridge over US 50. o MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA NHPP $757,600 _ $757,600 C rrrrents:Involves bridge number A1187. N MoDOT TCOS $189,400 $189,400 Award date 2019. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,047,000 Total $27,000 $5,000 $1,015,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,047,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA STP $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8.000 $8000 $8,000 $48,000 Name: State System Bridge Inspection N MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2.000 $2.000 $2,000 $12,000 TIP# 2015-03 G Local $0 MODOTd Other , $0 Description&Location: State Bridge Inspection FHWA $0 Program for on-system bridges at various R MoDOT $0 locations throughout the MPO. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments: N MoDOT _ $0 s Local $0_ T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $60,000 Total $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $60,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA STP $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $12,000 Non-State System Bridge Inspection E Name: N MoDOT TCOS $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $3,000 11P# 2014-04 c Local $0 MDDOT# Other $0 Description&Location:Non-State System FHWA $0 Bridge hspection Program for off-system Ro MoDOT $0 bridges at various locations throughout the w Local _ $0- - $0 NPO. Other - $0 C FHWA $0 Comments: N MoDOT $0 s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $15,000 Total $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $0 $15,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA NHPP $19,200 $20,000 $266,400 $305,600 Name: Bridge Improvements over Route 54 N MoDOT TCOS $4,800 $5,000 $66,600 $76,400 TIP# 2018-01 o Local $0 MoDOT#553261 Other $0 Description&Location:Includes bridge FHWA NHPP $8,000_ $8,000 improvements on Route 94 over Little Tavern oR MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $2,000 Creek in Callaway County and West Main over w Local $0 Route 54/63 in Cole County Other $0 C FHWA NHPP $1,464,000 _ $1,464,000 Comments:Project involves bridges A3451, N MoDOT TCOS $366,000 $366,000 A4265,and A4662.Award date 2020. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $2,222,000 Total $0 $24,000 $35,000 $2,163,000 SO $0 $0 $2,222,000 I Roadway Projects MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 _Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project US 50 Outer Road Improvements a FHWA $0• Name: N MoDOT TCOS $200 $18,800 $19,008 11P# 2017-03 o Local $0 MODOT#5P3200 MoDOT TCOS(AC) $800 $75,200 $76,000 Description&Location:Includes ramps at FHWA _ $0 Route 50 and Truman Blvd.hcludes a portion o MoDOT $0 of Mssouri Blvd.,a portion of Truman Blvd., w Local $0 and a portion of Big Horn Dr. Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Pavement improvements.Award date 2018. N MoDOT TCOS $237,800 $237,800 Anticipated federal reimbursement from STP. s Local $0 T MoDOT TCOS(AC) $951,200 $951,200 Total Project Cost: $1,284,000 Total $1,000 $1,283,000 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $1,284,000, 11 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project US 54 Pavement Improvements a FHWA $0 Name: N MoDOT TCOS $12,000 $43,000 $55,000 TIP# 2017-04 c Local $0 fvbDOT#5P3118 MoDOT TCOS(AC) $8,000 $172,000 $180,000 Description&Location:Pavement,bridge,and FHWA $0 guardrail improvements from just west of Stadium Blvd. oR MoDOT $0 in Jefferson City to west of the Missouri River bridge. w Local $0 Project involves bridges A1307 and A1672. Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Award date 2018.Anticipated N MoDOT TCOS $519,400 $519,400 federal reimbursement from SW. s Local $0 T MoDOT TCOS(AC) $2,077,600 $2,077,600 Total Project Cost: $2,832,000 Total $20,000 $2,812,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,832,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA NHPP $8,000 $8,000 $227,200 $243,200 US 54 Pavement Improvements F Name: N MoDOT TCOS $27,000 $2,000 $56,800 $85,800 TIP# 2017-05 o Local $0 fvbDOT#f 5P3121 other $0 Description&Location:Pavement FHWA $0 improvements on the eastbound and o Mo00T $0 westbound lanes of US 54 from Route E(near w Local $0 Brazito)to near Stadium Blvd.in Jefferson City. Other $0 C FHWA NHPP $3,040,000 $3,040,000 Comments:Length:Award Date 2019 N MoDOT TCOS $760,000 $760,000 s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $4,129,000 Total $35,000 $10,000 $4,084,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,129,000 City of Jefferson Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Stadium&US 54 Intersection FHWA STP $289,360 $289,360 Name: Improvements N MoDOT $0 TIP# 2013-15 G Local 1/2%Sales Tam $72,340 $72,340 NbDOT#/ Local $0 Description&Location:Highway FHWA $0 54/Jefferson/Stadium Boulevard, o MoDOT $0 StadiuMfvbnroe&US 54/Christy Dr.Access, w Local 1/2%Sales Tat $100,000 $100,000 Capacity,and Safety Improvements. Local 1/2%Sales Tat $100,000 $100,000 C FHWA STP $249,170 $249,170 $498,340 Comments:Local funding is from 1/2%Jefferson City N mom $0 Capital Improvement sales tax and Cole County 1/2% s Local 1/2%Sales Tat $360,165 $360,165 $720,330 sales tax T Local 1/2%Sales Taj $360,165 I $360,165 $720,330 Total Project Cost: $2,500,700 Total $1,531,200 $969,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,700 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Enhancement Projects in Central FHWA STP $67,200 $67,200 Name: District N MoDOT TCOS $16,800 _ $16,800 TIP# 2017-12 o Local $0 fvbDOT#fOS3021F Other $0' Description&Location: ADA Transition Ran FHWA $0 improvements at various locations in the o MoDOT $0 Central District w Local $0 Omer __ $5 C FHWA STP $1,053,600 $1,053,600 Comments:$1.2 million statewide transportation N MoDOT TCOS $263,400 $263,400 alternatives funds.Award Date 2021. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,401,000 Total $0 $0 So $0 $1,401,000 $0 $0 $1,401,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Enhancement Projects in Central FHWA STP $67 200 $67,200 Nam1e: District N MoDOT TCOS - $16,800 $16,800 TIP# '2018-05 G Local $0 fv%DOT#d OS3022F Other $0 Description&Location:ADA Transition Ran FHWA $0 improvements at various locations in the o MoDOT $0 Central District w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA STP $1,084,800 $1,084,800 Comments:$1.2 million statewide transportation N MoDOT TCOS $271,200 $271,200 alternatives funds.Award Date 2022. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,440,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,440,000 $0 $1,440,000 12 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Various Pavement,Bridge or FHWA $o Name: Operational Improvements N MoDOT TCOS $10,000 $10,000 $421,800 $441,800 TIP# 2017-19 c Local _ _ $0 MODOT#5P3216 MoDOT TCOS(AC) $40,000 $40,000- $1,687,200 $1,767,200 Description&Location:Pavement,bridge,or FHWA $0 operational improvements at various locations oR MoDOT $0 in the Central District. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comrments:Aw and date 2019.Anticipated N MoDOT TCOS $6,365,400 $6,365,400 federal reimbursement from SW. s Local $0 T MODOT TCOS(AC) $25,461,600 $25,461,600 Total Project Cost: $34,036,000 Total $50,000 $50,000 $33,936,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,036,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Various Pavement and Bridge FHWA $0 Name: ,Improvements fd MoDOT TCOS $1,200 $6,600 $88,600 $96,400 TIP# 2017-20 c Local $0 MDDOTd 5S3043B MoDOT TCOS(AC) $800 026,400 $354,400 $381,600 Description&Location: Pavement and bridge FHWA $0 improvements at various routes in the Central o Moo:T $o District. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Corrmnts:Award date 2019.Anticipated N MoDOT TCOS $1,061,000 $1,061,000 federal reinturserilent from SW. s Local $0 T MoDOT TCOS(AC) $4,244,000 $4,244,000 Total Project Cost: $5,783,000 Total $2,000 533,000 $5,748,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,783,000 Other Projects MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA HSIP $40,500 $4,500 $900 $45,900 Scoping Routes M,B&W e Name: H MoDOT Safety $4,500 $500 $100 $5,100 TIP# 2013-16 s Local $0 MoDOT#r 552234 Other $0 Description&Location:Scoping for safety FHWA $0 - improvements at the intersection of Route M p MoDOT $0 and Route Win Wardsville. w Local $0 Other _ $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Anticipated federal funding category: 0 MoDOT $0 Safety.Future construction costs:$301,000 to S Local $0 $1,000,000. T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $51,000 Total $45,000 $5,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA HSIP $105,600 $105,600 Safety Projects in Central District e Name: EN MoDOT Safety $26,400 $26,400 TIP# 2017-16 o Local $0 MoDOT#'0P3021 F Other $0 Description&Location: Safety projects at FHWA $0 various locations in the Central District. o MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other __ $0 C FHWA HSIP _ $1,652,000 $1,652,000 Comments:$1.89 million from Open Container N MoDOT Safety $413,000 $413,000 funds.Award Date 2021.90/10 Grant/match. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $2,197,000 Total $0 00 SO $0 $2,197,000 $0 $0 $2,197,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA HSIP $105,600 $105,600 Safety Projects in Central District e Name: H MoDOT Safety $26,400 $26,400 TIP# '2018-04 G Local $0 MoDOTd OP3022F Other $0 Description&Location:Safety projects at FHWA $0 various locations in the Central District. o MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA HSIP $1,701,600 $1,701,600 Comments:$1.89 trillion from Open Container N MoDOT Safety $425,400 $425,400 funds.Award Date 2022.90/10 Grant/match. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $2,259,000 Total $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $2,259,000 $0 $2,259,000 13 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Guard Cable&Guardrail Repair in FHWA $o Name: Northern Central District N MoDOT TCOS $7,600 $7,600 TIP# 2018-06 c Local _ $0 Mo • DOT#5P3274 M000T TCOS(AC) $30,400 $30,400 • Description&Location:Job order contracting FHWA $0 for guard cables and guardrail repair on R MoDOT $0 various routes in the northern portion of the w Local $0 Central District. Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Award Date Spring 2018. N MoDOT TCOS $102,000 $102,000 Anticipated federal reirrbursernmnt from SIP. s Local $0 T MODOT TCOS(AC) $408,000 $408,000 Total Project Cost: $548,000 Total $0 $548,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $548,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA STP $23,200 $4,000 $4,000 $31,200 Scoping for Pavement Improvements F Name: N MoDOT TCOS $5,800 $1,000 $1,000 $7,800 TIP# '2017-22 c Local $0 NbDOTtf 5P3044 Other $0 Description&Location:Scoping for pavement FHWA $0 improvements on various routes in the Central o Mo00T $0 District. w Local $0 _Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Anticipated federal funding category:STP. °MoDOT $0 Future construction cost$15 million-$25 million. S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $39,000 Total $29,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S39,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA STP $48,000 $4,000 $200 $200_ $200_ $200 $52,800 Slide Repair Scoping e Name: N MoDOT TCOS $12,000 $1,000 $50 $50 $50 $50 $13,200 TIP# 2015-07 G Local $0 M2DOTtl5S3081 Other $0 Description&Location:Scoping for slide FHWA _ _ $0 repairs in the northern portion of the Cental 0 MoDOT $0 District at various locations. w Local $0 Other _ $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Anticipated Federal Funding Category- 0 MoDOT $0 STP.Future construction cost$2 million-5 million. S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $66,000 Total $60,000 $5,000 $250 $250 $250 $250 $0 $66,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA STP $15,200 $4,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $23,200 Name. Pavement Improvement Scoping N MoDOT TCOS $3,800 $1,000 $250 $250 $250 $250 $5,800 TIP# 2016-10 G Local $0- lvbDOTd 5P3045 Other $0 Description&Location:Scoping for pavement FHWA $0 improvements on various routes in the Central o MoDOT $0 District. w Local $0 Other _ $0 C FHWA _ $0 Comments:Anticipated federal funding category:STP. 0 MoDOT $0 Future construction cost$25 million-$50 million. 8 Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $29,000 Total $19.000 55,000 S1,250 $1,250 $1,250 $1,250 $0 $29,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 • Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA HSIP $900 $900 On-call Work Zone Enforcement Name: N MoDOT Safety $100 $100 TIP# '2017-21 G Local $0 lvbDOTt'5P3217 Other $0 Description&Location:On-call work zone FHWA $0 enforcement at various locations in the Central Ro MoDOT $0 District. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA HSIP $31,500 $31,500 Comments:90/10 match,using federal and N MoDOT Safety $3,500 $3,500 M3DOT safety funds. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $36,000 Total $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 to S36,000 14 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project FHWA HSIP S900 $900 On-call Work Zone Enforcement Name: N MoDOT Safety $100 $100 TIP# 2018-07 o Local _ $0 MoDOT#5P3224 Other $0 Description&Location:On-call work zone FHWA $0 enforcement at various locations in the Central o MoDOT $0 District. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA HSIP $31,500 $31,500 Comments:90/10 match,using federal and N MoDOT Safety $3,500 $3,500 MoDOT safety funds. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $36,000 Total $0 $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Scoping for Safety Improvements for FHWA HSIP $45,000 $202,500 $45,000 $292,500 Name: U.S.54 in Cole,Miler,and Camden N MoDOT TCOS $5,000 $22,500 $5,000 $32,500 TIP# 2017-25 o Local $0 MDDOTd 5P3222 MoDOT $0 Description&Location:Scoping for safety FHWA $0 improvements along US 54 in Cole,Miller,and o MoDOT $0 Camden counties. From West of Stadium w Local $0 Boulevard in Jefferson City to Cecil Street in MoDOT $0 Camdenton. c FHWA $0 Comments: Anticipated future cost is between N MoDOT $0 $5 and$10 million. s Local $o T MoDOT $0 Total Project Cost: $325,000 Total $50,000 $225,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project SurveyingE FHWA .. _ $0 Name: H MoDOT TCOS $50,000 $25,000 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500 $105,000 TIP# 2018-08 G Local $0 MDDOTT/5P3179 MoDOT $0 Description&Location: Surveying to sell FHWA $0 excess right of way parcels in the Central o MoDOT $0 District. w Local $0 MoDOT _ $0 C FHWA $0 Comments: No federal funds used for this N MoDOT $o project. s Local $0 T MoDOT $0 Total Project Cost: $105,000 Total $50,000 $25,000 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500 $0 $105,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Pavement and shoulder improvements FHWA STP $32,000 $32,000 $478,400 $542,400 Name: on Route M N MoDOT TCOS $6,000 $8,000 $87,600 $103,600, TIP# 2018-02 o Local $0 MoDOTti 5S3230 Other $0 Description&Location:Pavement and shoulder FHWA $0 improvements from Rte.B to Rte.50.Includes o MoDOT $0 pavements and shoulder improvements on Rte.E from w Local $0 Rte.54 to Rte.B.Project also includes pavement Other _ $0 improvements on Rte.W,Rte.Y and Rte.J. C FHWA STP $2,280,800 $2,280,800 Comments:Potential ADA improvements in 0 MoDOT TCOS $570,200 $570,200 Taos. Award date 2020. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $3,497,000 1 Total $0 $40,000 $40,000 $3,417,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,497,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Pavement and shoulder improvements FHWA $0 Name: on Route C N MoDOT TCOS $8,000 $99,400 $107.400 TIP# 2018-03 G Local _ $0 MoDOT#15S3259 MoDOT TCOS(AC) $32,000 $397,600 S429,600 Description&Location:Pavement and shoulder FHWA $0 improvements from Route 52 near Versailles to o MoDOT $0 Jefferson City. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Award date Fall 2018. N MoDOT TCOS $1,174,400 $1,174,400 s Local $0 T MoDOT TCOS(AC) $4,697,600 $4,697,600 Total Project Cost: $6,409,000 Total $0 $40,000 $6,369,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,409,000 15 MoDOT Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Scoping for ADA Improvements in FHWA $o Name: Various Locations E MoDOT TCOS $5,000 $1,250 $1,250 $1,250 $1,250 $10,000 TIP# '2018-09 o Local $0 WIDOW 5P3254 MoDOT TCOS(AC) $20,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $40,000 Description&Location:Scoping for ADA FHWA $0 improvements at various locations in o MoDOT $0 Waynesville,Chamois,Frankenstein,Taos, w Local $0 Wardsville,and Vienna. Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments: N MoDOT $0 S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $50,000 sulw Total $0 $25,000 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $6,250 $0 $50,000 Pedestrian&Bicycle Projects City of Jefferson Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Community Park Greenway Trailhead E FHWA RTP $8,000 $8,000 Nam1e: H MODOT $0 • TIP# 2017-24 C Local $0 MoDOTi Other $0 Description&Location: Development of a FHWA $0 greenway trailhead at Community Park-a restroom, o MoDOT $0 spray ground,misting station,water fountain,bike rack, w Local $0 additional parking,benches,landscaping,and lighting. Other $0 Paid for by Local Parks Sales Tax. C FHWA RTP $71,000 $71,000_ $142,000 Comments:The Jefferson City Cultural Arts N MoDOT $0 Foundation,Central Bank and Ameren Missouri have s Local Parks Tax $70,000 $70,000 $140,000 pledged donations to help fund the project. T Other Private Don. $19,000 $19,000 Total Project Cost: $309,000 Total $168,000 $141,000 SO 00 $0 $0 $0 $309,000 City of Jefferson Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 I 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project Mssouri Boulevard Sidew alk,Beck to' FHWA TAP $0 Name: Waverly EMoDOT $0 TIP# 2017-27 c Local Sales Tax $0 MoDOT MoDOT $0 Description&Location:Construct a 5'wide FHWA $0 sidew alk along the northern side of Mssouri Pro MoDOT $0 Boulevard from Beck Street to Waverly Street. w Local $0 Includes Bicycle/Pedestrian/Transit facilities. Mo0OT $0 C FHWA TAP $278,564 $278,564 Corrrrents: TAP Grant aw ardee. N MoDOT $0 S Local Sales Tax $69,641 $69,641 T MoDOT $0 Total Project Cost: $348,205Total _ $0 $348,205 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $348,205 C Public Transportation Projects City of Jefferson-JEFFTRAN Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Future Totals Project o Other Pass.Fares $598,000 $223,510 $230,215 $237,122 $244,235 $251,562 $1,784,644 Operating Assistance Name: P MoDOT State Operating $17,500 $7,725 $7,957 $8,195 $8,441 $8,694 $58,512 TIP# 2011-04 E Local $2,287,506 $1,247,895 $1,285,332 $1,323,892 $1,363,609 $1,404,517 $8,912,751 NbDOT# R FTA 5307 $1,595,207 $775,236 $798,493 $822,448 $847,121 $872,535 $5,711,040 Description&Location:Operating Assistance FHWA $0 for JEFFTRAN service within city limits of o MoDOT _ $0 Jefferson City(A 3%annual inflation factor w Local - _ I_ _ _ so applied.) Other $0' C FHWA $0 Comments: N MoDOT $0 S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $16,466,947 Tata! $4,498,213 $2,254,366 $2,321,997 $2,391,657 $2,463,406 $2,537,308 $0 $16,466,947 16 Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects v t/ —\_/- 54 CAMPO � Transportation Improvement Program July 1,2016-June 30,2021 \ i n Amended February 15,2017 111 J Umhlykee �Bndge Road Improvement 7IP52017-26 =Pedestrian Facility us 54 Safety Improvements in CallawaMPFIy COW 1 1 -, -� w _ If"�Hdrn summa J\ / / —C-tl `4 TIP#2017-04 / p /r l— US 59 Pavement Improvements from `"' near Stadium Blvd.tithe Minoan RWee �/ ii,,,i, HAINIMIL- 00411.71114 1 --_-I -7.' I TIP#2013 05 '� 1- TIP#2017-03 Dix Road Brides Improvements j — Roula 50 vuier raatls improvements. l�.f, F (//�� n� 43r1 L 'y'er JeWreanl • ti- 1 ti Z* TIP 112017-24 1� TIP#2017-27 , - r017 Communhy Park Greenway Trailhead r MISSNJrI BouleMam SltleWelk �:w _.__.-r Beck W Wadzy iii rllr' __ --� TIP#2013-15 �/� TIP#201701 statlium,Jefferson,Monroe.&US 54 US 50 al Liberty Road rr Access and intereatfian Improvement T- 111111*Intersection Improvements l— �__ i ` MI IA P - - TIP#2017-05 {. TIP#2017-02 _� f -US 54 Pavement Imurovemenls ham US 50 improvements from Moreau _ \ Route E to near Stadium Blvd- � ' Rivet to near me Osage Rivet' j- 4f\\\W f $ I ,_ r i V i TIP a2p13-16 -- FT... 'f wew al. Swping Route M and w _ L ��. _ - _ ! relli TIP#2017-08 I lir i TIP#2017.07 I Route B Pavement Improvements and Route J Budge Improvements �ff `rte 41111„ (/ \ Shouldef lmpyovent@nts 1s Ili, ©' ��. Q~ VI -- -- TIP# o2017-25 - - --- _ so Sowing for Safety Improvements along US 54m Cale Millar,and Camden counties 0 D5 1 2 9 4 -- -' ..,.�..� �.�ueoee,d.✓fiaxs ..tvm.nrr..�s..... Sado AA ' � 6! 17 Program of Projects - OATS OATS Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future , Totals Project C FTA 5339 $40,000 $40,000 Capital Funding-Vehicles AName: $0 TIP# 2015-01 l Local $2,000 $2,000 MoDOT# T OATS $8,000 $8,000 Description&Location:Replacement of lift FHWA $0 equipped vehicles throughout service region. o MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Previous TIP Number 2011-03 N MoDOT _ $0 s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $50,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 S50.000 OATS Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Section 5316 Job Access Reverse C FTA 5316 $60,000 $36,000 $96,000 Name: Commute P MoDOT $0 TIP# 2015-02 E Local $0 MDDOTfC R Contract $6,000 $36,000 $42,000 Description&Location:Operating expenses for FHWA $0 service in Cole and Callaway Counties.OATS o M000r $0 portion is local contracts. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Previous TIP Number 2011-02 N MoDOT $0 s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $138,000 1 Total $66,000 $72,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $138,000 OATS Funding Prior State Program Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA 5310 $6,100 $6,000 $12,100 Section 5310 Continued Service Name: N MoDOT $0 TIP# 2016-15 o Local $0 MODOTd Fares $6,100 $6,000 $12,100, Description&Location:OATS for FTA Section FHWA $0 5310 funding which is for services for seniors o MoDOT _ $0 and people with disabilities.OATS portion is w Local $0 rade up of fares. Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comnents:The total grant was$119,000,but N MoDOT $0 the rest is being used in St.Joseph and s Local $0 Columbia MO T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $24,200 Total $12,200 $12,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 524,200 18 Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN JEFFTRAN Program of Projects Illustrative Projects Item Description Total FTA Local 1 Replace Obsolete Lighting in Bus Barn with Energy Efficient Lighting $ 10,000 $ 8,000 $ 2,000 Update Automatic Vehicle Location(AVL)equipment,purchase Automatic Passenger 2 Counter(APC)equipment and purchase Automatic Voice Annunciation(AVA)equipment $ 275,000 $ 220,000 $ 55,000 3 Paratransit widebody cutaway bus replacement(2) $ 120,000 $ 96,000 $ 44,000 4 Upgrade/replace electronic fare card system $ 300,000 $ 240,000 $ 60,000 5 Design work for New Transit Passenger Transfer and Admin Facility $ 150,000 $ - $150,000 6 Replace outdated bus video systems $ 60,000_ $ 48,000 $ 12,000 7 Purchase new phone system $ 10,000 $ 8,000 $ 2,000 8 Replace low-floor minivan support vehicle $ 40,000 $ 32,000 $ 8,000 9 Transit facility improvements--roof and gutter replacement for CM,bus barn,wash facility $ 200,000_ $ 160,000 $ 40,000 10 Transit facility improvements--overhead doors for CM and Bus Barn $ 95,000 $ 76,000 $ 19,000 11 Repair Transfer Facility Roof& Defective Windows(Bus Shelter) $ 12,000 $ 9,600_$ 2,400 12 Security camera upgrades _ $ 20,000_ $ 16,000 $ 4,000 13 Public restroom upgrades $ 7,500 $ 6,000 $ 1,500 14 Purchase and install 4-6 bus shelters at various locations in Jefferson City $ 60,000 $ 48,000 $ 12,000 15 Purchase emergency back-up generator&switches _ $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 20,000 16 Replace current low-floor route buses with 30 ft.electric low floor buses for 2019 delivery(2) $ 1,200,000 $ 960,000 $240,000 17 Replace current low-floor route buses with 30 ft.electric low floor buses for 2021 delivery(3) $ 1,800,000 $1,440,000 $360,000 18 Purchase Paratransit software package $ 25,000 $ 20,000 $ 5,000 19 Construct new passenger transfer and administrative facility $ 3,000,000 $2,400,000 $600,000 20 Transit training facility rehab $ 50,000 $ 40,000 $ 10,000 21 JEFFTRAN lighted signs $ 10,000 $ 8,000 $ 2,000 Transit Traveler Information System(6-Transfer facility,LU Wellness Center,Capitol Mall, 22 Both Wal-Marts,Eastland Convenient Food Mart) $ 60,000 $ 48,000 $ 12,000 23 Bike racks at passenger transfer facilities and selected bus stops $ 20,000 $ 16,000 $ 4,000 24 Security gates for transit storage,maintenance and fueling facilities $ 20,000 $ 16,000 $ 4,000 25 Inductive charging system for electric buses $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 20,000 Multimodal Projects In 2015, CAMPO met with federal and state planning partners in a formal planning process review. Within two recommendations made, CAMPO was urged to include more multi-modal projects into the TIP. CAMPO staff sent out written requests and reminders at CAMPO meetings for projects, including those not using federal dollars. As of the writing of this document,no projects have been submitted. However,there are a number of factors why these projects are limited. These types of projects are usually incorporated into new road projects. Many of these types of projects are highly dependent on grants, which may or may not be annually awarded. Projects are usually decided each budget year. There are several bicycle or pedestrian projects in the MTP illustrative list,but projects are not constrained and funds are not obligated. 19 Appendix A — Amendments and Administrative Modifications Amendments TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Board OneDOT Approval Approval TIP Amendment 1 Administrative Modifications TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Date 20 Appendix B — Federal Funding Sources Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO planning area. FHWA Program Eligible Activities National Highway Performance Program(NHPP) The NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/nhpp.cfm the National Highway System(NHS),for the construction of new facilities on the NHS,and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward the achievement of performance targets established in a State's asset management plan for the NHS. Surface Transportation Program(STP) The Surface Transportation Program(STP)provides flexible funding http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/stp.cfm that may be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway,bridge and tunnel projects on any public road,pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure,and transit capital projects,including intercity bus terminals. Highway Safety Improvement Program(HSIP) Highway Safety Improvement Program(HSIP)is to support a http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/ significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads,including non-State-owned public roads and roads on tribal lands Transportation Alternatives Program(TAP) Funds most activities funded under the Transportation http://www.thwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/tap.cfin Enhancements,Recreational Trails,and Safe Routes to School programs under SAFETEA-LU. Railway-Highway Crossings(set-aside from HSIP) This program funds safety improvements to reduce the number of http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/ncc.cfm fatalities,injuries,and crashes at public grade crossings. FTA Programs Eligible Activities Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants This program provides grants to Urbanized Areas (UZA)for public http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MAP- transportation capital,planning,job access and reverse commute 21 Fact Sheet - projects,as well as operating expenses in certain circumstances. Urbanized Area_Formula_Grants.pdf Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons Individuals with Disabilities with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MAP- needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public 21 Fact Sheet - transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals wit complementary paratransit services. h Disabilities.pdf Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas This program provides capital,planning,and operating assistance to http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MAP- states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations 21 Fact Sheet - less than 50,000,where many residents often rely on public transit to _Formula_Grants_for_Rural_Areas.pdf reach their destinations. Section 5329 Transit Safety&Oversight MAP-21 grants FTA the authority to establish and enforce a new http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MAP- comprehensive framework to oversee the safety of public 21 Fact Sheet - Transit Safety and Oversight.pdf transportation throughout the United States as it pertains to heavy rail,light rail,buses,ferries,and streetcars. Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Provides capital funding to replace,rehabilitate and purchase buses http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MAP- and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities. 21 Fact Sheet - Bus and Bus Facilities.pdf 21 Appendix C — Policies and Procedures Amendments An amendment involves a major change to a project and requires approval by the Board of Directors and Governor. An amendment is a revision that requires public review, allowance of comment, possible re- demonstration of fiscal constraint, and includes at least one of the following: • Addition or deletion of a project using FHWA or FTA funds (except as allowed as an administrative modification), • Major changes affecting project cost from FHWA or FTA sources (changes exceeding 20% of FHWA or FTA sources of the existing project cost or changes over$2,000,000), • Major changes in a project phase initiation date(greater than 12 months), or • Major changes in design concept or design scope, such as changing project termini (more than 1/2 mile or 10% of the total length of the project, whichever is greater) or changing the number of through traffic lanes that also includes a substantial increase in Federal cost. Amendments will be initiated by the project sponsor. Amendments to delete a project can simply be made via written correspondence identifying the project and why it is to be removed from the TIP. Amendments to include a new project can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover letter or remark in the comment section requesting inclusion in the TIP as an amendment. Amendments for existing projects can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover letter or remark in the comment section highlighting the change in the project and providing the CAMPO TIP Number. After an Amendment has been requested the process as follows: • Staff will review the amendment for accuracy and to verify if an amendment is required or if the change qualifies as an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if necessary. • The amendment will be placed on the next Technical Committee(TC)meeting agenda for review. • If approval is recommended by the TC to the Board of Directors, staff will post the amendment notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar day public comment period, send notices to the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next Board of Directors meeting agenda. • At the Board of Directors Meeting, a public hearing will close the public comment period and a vote for approval will be held. If the project sponsor indicates an emergency situation upon submitting the amendment, staff will initiate the public comment period, staff will post the amendment notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar day public comment period, send notices to the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next Board of Directors meeting agenda. A public hearing will close the public comment period at the next Board of Directors Meeting and hold a vote for approval. If this is not adequate to meet the emergency situation, a special Board of Directors meeting may be called and proceed as outlined in the Public Participation Plan. 22 Administrative Modifications Revisions to the TIP and TIP projects that do not meet the criteria of an Amendment will be considered administrative modifications including: minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation dates. An administrative modification is a revision that neither requires committee action, public review and comment,nor redemonstrates fiscal constraint. An administrative modification will be initiated by the project sponsor by written communication to CAMPO staff describing the change (phase cost, funding sources, or phase initiation date)warranting the modification. Staff will review the administrative modification for accuracy and to verify qualification as an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if necessary. Upon CAMPO staff confirmation of the administrative modification requirements being met, staff will modify the TIP appropriately, including noting the administrative modification in Appendix A of the TIP and making changes to the project listing in the body of the TIP; notify the Board of Directors, Technical Committee, MoDOT, FTA, and FHWA via email; draft a staff memo for the next Board of Directors and Technical Committee meeting; and post the modified TIP notice on the CAMPO website for a minimum of 7 calendar days. Combining or Splitting Projects Splitting a project into two or more projects or combining two or more projects can provide benefits to project scheduling, cost, and logistics. A split or combination can be made via an administrative modification to the TIP, if the project does not trigger a major change to the project as described in the amendment section and the overall scope of work does not change. When combining two or more projects,the financial and description information will be rolled up into the project which was in the TIP originally and use the previous MPO TIP number. When splitting a project into two or more projects, the financial and descriptive information will be separated appropriately into several (two or more) projects using the same MPO TIP number, but the additional projects will include alphabetic suffixes. The process for splitting or combining projects will follow the procedures of either an amendment or administrative modification. Compliance with Metropolitan Transportation Plan For a project to be eligible for the TIP, it first must be included in the adopted Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Large capital projects, roadway capacity, and/or general purpose roadway projects must be individually listed or clearly part of a larger project included in the fiscally-constrained component of the plan. Certain projects seeking to improve safety, increase multi-modal opportunities, or enhance the existing transportation system may be programmed in the TIP without individual identification in the regional plan, so long as they are consistent with the established goals and objectives of the plan. Project Delay Policy The goal of the Project Delay Policy for the Transportation Improvement Program is to maximize the federal funding obligated each fiscal year and to enable the MPO to redirect funds to different projects if 23 any are inactive or otherwise limited from making progress. The Delay Policy applies to projects funded through the programs for which CAMPO has oversight of project selection. The intent of the Delay Policy is to provide an incentive for local agency sponsors to develop their projects according to a detailed schedule and, thereby, to obligate the federal funds assigned to each project within the timeframes initially shown in the TIP. The Delay Policy is primarily focused on projects that involve construction or provide transportation improvements that are handled through purchasing procedures. In the context of this Delay Policy, a "delay" occurs when a construction-related project phase does not get advertised within six months of the TIP program year in which its construction phase funding was originally programmed, or changed with an amendment, in the TIP. For non-construction projects and programs, a "delay" occurs when the "Notice to Proceed" is not issued within two months of the TIP program year in which its implementation was originally funded in the TIP. The consequence of a delay may be the withdrawal of its Federal funds from the TIP or other action by the Board. Project Funding Information When a new project is submitted for inclusion to the TIP, either during the initial development of the TIP or as an amendment, the project sponsor is required to provide information regarding the local funding sources in order to show fiscal constraint. The specific source of revenue, anticipated future, and any other financial information needed to show fiscal constraint will be required. Project Selection The CAMPO Board of Directors adopted (Resolution 2010-04) a project prioritization and selection process. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff and reviewed by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote of approval. The Board of Directors may modify the project selection it deems necessary. Project Sponsor Commitment to Projects Project sponsors hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring that project information contained in the TIP is correct, that it accurately represents the scope of work being performed, and that the amount of funding being requested is correct. The sponsor is responsible for providing CAMPO with an honest accounting of project details including: costs, implementation schedules, and local matching fund sources, at the time of the application for federal funds and anytime such details change. The project sponsor is also responsible for reviewing the TIP after a project is included or modified to ensure correctness. Scriveners' Error Errors made the in the ministerial functions of creating and maintaining the TIP, such as cartography, typographical, spelling,minor word omissions,mathematical,and other error's which do not alter the intent of the TIP and have little or no impact can be performed by staff and shall not be considered a revision to the TIP. 24 Appendix D — Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNNG PROCESS CERTIFICATION In accordance with 23 CFR 450.334, the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization,which is the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Jefferson City, Missouri Urbanized Area and the Missouri Department of Transportation hereby certify that the transportation planning process is addressing major issues in the metropolitan planning area and is being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements of: 1. 23 U.S.C.134,49 U.S.C.5303,and this subpart; 2, in nonattainment and maintenance areas,sections 174 and 176(c)and(d)of the Clean Air Act, as amended(42 U.S.C.7504,7506(c)and(d))and 40 CFR part 93;(Not Applicable) 3. Title VE of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,as amended(42 U.S.C.2000d-1)and 49 CFR part 21; 4. 49 U.S.C.5332,prohibiting discrimination on the bases of race,color,creed,national origin,sex, or age in employment or business opportunity; 5. Section 1101(b) of MAP-21 and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT funded projects; 6. 23 CFR part 230,regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts; 7. The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(42 U.S.C.12101 et seq.)and 49 CFR parts 77,37,and 38; 8. The Older Americans Act,as amended(42 U.S.C.6101),prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial-aid assistance; 9. Section 324 of title 23 U.S.C.regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender;and 10, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities. I further certify that I am aware of what this certification represents and have been briefed accordingly. D 4-7(3 Jeff i--Io scher,Chairman David Silvester Capital Area Metropolitan Organization Missouri Department of Transportation Date Date Capita/Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program 25 Appendix E — Definitions Attainment area means any geographic area in which levels of a given criteria air State Transportation Agency's program resources, 2) that have a high level of pollutant(e.g.,ozone,carbon monoxide,PM10,PM2.5,and nitrogen dioxide)meet public or congressional attention,or 3)that have extraordinary implications for the the health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for that national transportation system. pollutant.An area may be an attainment area for one pollutant and a nonattainment Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) means the geographic area determined by area for others. A maintenance area (see definition below) is not considered an agreement between the metropolitan planning organization(MPO)for the area and attainment area for transportation planning purposes. the Governor,in which the metropolitan transportation planning process is carried Available funds means funds derived from an existing source dedicated to or out. historically used for transportation purposes.For Federal funds,authorized and/or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) means the official multimodal appropriated funds and the extrapolation of formula and discretionary funds at transportation plan addressing no less than a 20-year planning horizon that is historic rates of increase are considered available.A similar approach may be used developed, adopted, and updated by CAMPO through the metropolitan for State and local funds that are dedicated to or historically used for transportation transportation planning process. purposes. Nonattainment area means any geographic region of the United States that has been Conformity means a Clean Air Act(42 U.S.C.7506(c))requirement that ensures that designated by the EPA as a nonattainment area under section 107 of the Clean Air Federal funding and approval are given to transportation plans, programs and Act for any pollutants for which an NAAQS exists. projects that are consistent with the air quality goals established by a State Implementation Plan (SIP). Conformity, to the purpose of the SIP, means that Obligated projects means strategies and projects funded under title 23 U.S.C. and transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations,worsen existing title 49 U.S.C.Chapter 53 for which the supporting Federal funds were authorized violations, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. The transportation and committed by the State or designated recipient in the preceding program year, conformity rule (40 CFR part 93) sets forth policy, criteria, and procedures for and authorized by the FHWA or awarded as a grant by the FTA. demonstrating and assuring conformity of transportation activities. Program of Projects(POP) is a list of projects to be funded in a grant application Cooperation means that the parties involved in carrying out the transportation submitted to FTA by a designated recipient. The POP lists the subrecipients and planning and programming processes work together to achieve a common goal or indicates whether they are private non-profit agencies,governmental authorities,or objective. private providers of transportation service,designates the areas served(including rural areas),and identifies any tribal entities. In addition,the POP includes a brief Coordination means the cooperative development of plans,programs,and schedules description of the projects,total project cost,and Federal share for each project. among agencies and entities with legal standing and adjustment of such plans, programs,and schedules to achieve general consistency,as appropriate. Project selection means the procedures followed by MPOs, States, and public transportation operators to advance projects from the first four years of an approved Design concept means the type of facility identified for a transportation improvement TIP and/or STIP to implementation,in accordance with agreed upon procedures. project(e.g.,freeway,expressway,arterial highway,grade separated highway,toll road,reserved right-of-way rail transit,mixed-traffic rail transit,or busway). Project sponsor must be a city, county, state, or other transportation related government agency eligible to receive federal funding from the Federal Highway Design scope means the aspects that will affect the proposed facility's impact on the or Federal Transit Administrations. All other entities must partner with a city, region,usually as they relate to vehicle or person carrying capacity and control county,or state agency to apply for and/or administer a transportation project. (e.g., number of lanes or tracks to be constructed or added, length of project, signalization, safety features, access control including approximate number and Public transportation operator means the public entity which participates in the location of interchanges,or preferential treatment for high occupancy vehicles). continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135 and 49 U.S.C.5303 and 5304,and is the Financial Plan means documentation required to be included with a metropolitan designated recipient of Federal funds under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for transportation plan and TIP (and optional for the long-range statewide transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and continuing general or transportation plan and STIP) that demonstrates the consistency between special transportation to the public,but does not include school bus, charter, or reasonably available and projected sources of Federal, State, local, and private intercity bus transportation or intercity passenger rail transportation provided by revenues and the costs of implementing proposed transportation system Amtrak. improvements. Regionally significant project means a transportation project(other than projects that Financially Constrained or Fiscal Constraint means that the metropolitan may be grouped in the TIP and/or STIP or exempt projects as defined in EPA's transportation plan, TIP, and STIP includes sufficient financial information for transportation conformity regulation(40 CFR part 93))that is on a facility which demonstrating that projects in the metropolitan transportation plan,TIP,and STIP serves regional transportation needs(such as access to and from the area outside can be implemented using committed,available, or reasonably available revenue the region;major activity centers in the region;major planned developments such sources, with reasonable assurance that the federally supported transportation as new retail malls, sports complexes, or employment centers; or transportation system is being adequately operated and maintained. For the TIP and the STIP, terminals) and would normally be included in the modeling of the metropolitan financial constraint/fiscal constraint applies to each program year. Additionally, area's transportation network. At a minimum,this includes all principal arterial projects in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas can be included in the highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer a significant alternative first two years of the TIP and STIP only if funds are available or committed. to regional highway travel. Illustrative Project means an additional transportation project that may(but is not Statewide transportation improvement program (STIP) means a statewide required to)be included in a financial plan for a metropolitan transportation plan, prioritized listing/program of transportation projects covering a period of four years TIP,or STIP if reasonable additional resources were to become available. that is consistent with the long-range statewide transportation plan,metropolitan Maintenance Area means any geographic region of the United States that the EPA transportation plans,and TIPS,and required for projects to be eligible for funding previously designated as a nonattainment area for one or more pollutants pursuant under title 23 U.S.C.and title 49 U.S.C.Chapter 53. to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,and subsequently redesignated as an Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a document prepared by a attainment area subject to the requirement to develop a maintenance plan under metropolitan planning organization that lists projects to be funded with section 175A of the Clean Air Act,as amended. FHWA/FTA funds for the at least next one-to three-year period. Major Projects-These transportation improvements are defined as projects receiving Unified Planning Work Plan(UPWP)is the management plan for the(metropolitan) Federal financial assistance 1)with an estimated total cost of$500 million or more planning program. Its purpose is to coordinate the planning activities of all or 2) that have been identified by the FHWA as being a Major Project. The participants in the planning process. designated projects may include those: 1)that require a substantial amount of a 26 Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 2017—2021 New Project Application Project Name: Para-Transit Vehicles(2) Primary Project Sponsoring Organization: JEFFTRAN Project Contact: Mark Mehmert Sponsor Project Number: Type of Project(check all that apply): ❑ Airport/Aviation ❑ Bicycle/Pedestrian ❑ Bridge ❑ Intersection El Plans/Studies ❑ Roadway Expansion ❑ Roadway Preservation ❑ Railway ❑ Safety ® Transit ❑ Other: • Project Description: Purchase 2 E450 Elkhart Coach II, Floor Plan CC Handi-Wheels buses with Apollo 5-camera system. Project Location: City of Jefferson Project History: These paratransit vehicles will replace 2-2010 model year buses which have accumulated well over the required 150,000 miles. FTA 5310 funds are designated for meeting the transportation needs of the elderly and disabled. Project Timeline,Cost and Funding Sources: CAMPO Program Years(July 1-June 30) Project Funding Funding Agency Funding Funding Phase Source Agency Category Prior 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Source Years Totals - Federal FTA 5310 $97,465.60 $97,465.60 - Local City of Capital Jefferson Improvement $40,396.40 $40,396.40 Program Yearly Totals $137,862 Total Project Cost= $137,862 Source of operating/maintenance funding for 10 years after project is completed: Combination of FTA-Section 5307, City of Jefferson-Capital Improvement Program sales tax, MoDOT state operating assistance and passenger fares. Additional Comments: Agenda Item 7A 1 Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457 9ll emorand um TO: CAMPO Technical Committee FROM: Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner DATE: April 3, 2017 SUBJECT: Status of Current Work Tasks Major active work tasks to be discussed at the April 6,2017 Technical Committee Meeting include: • Visioning and Travel Demand Model update. The selection committee met in March to interview qualified consultants. Four consultants were interviewed. • JEFFTRAN System-Wide Assessment. The JEFFTRAN System-Wide Assessment, conducted by contractor the Lochmueller Group, began in March. The consultants conducted several stakeholder meetings and a public meeting during the week of March 27. The consultants also worked with a local agency to conduct bus counts during that same time period. • Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan - Staff will attend the April 6 Transportation and Traffic Commission meeting to seek a letter of support for adoption of the plan by the City of Jefferson. Staff has already presented to and received a letter of support from the Parks and Recreation Commission. Staff will then attend the April 13 City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to seek adoption of the plan as a component of the Comprehensive Plan. • Statewide MPO Coordination- Staff has been collaborating with other MPOs within Missouri to improve efficiency in development of required state and federal plans and documents. An MPO Manual is being developed as part of this process,detailing best practices. Agenda Item 8A Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.