Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout08.15.2017 City Council Meeting PacketMEDINA AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, August 15, 2017 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 Meeting Rules of Conduct: • Fill out and turn in white comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the August 2, 2017 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Appoint Andrew Scharf to Police Officer Position B. Approve Job Description and Authorize Recruitment for Community Service Officer Position C. Resolution Granting Conditional Use Permit Approval to David and Katherine Crosby for a Second Principal Dwelling at 2402 Hamel Road VI. PRESENTATIONS A. Resolution Awarding the Sale of $1,235,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2017A VII. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Arrowhead Holdings, LLC — Preliminary/Final Plat; Lot Combination - 4101 Arrowhead Drive 1. Resolution Granting Preliminary and Final Plat Approval for Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition 2. Resolution Granting Lot Combination Approval for 4101 Arrowhead Drive and Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition B. Medina Senior Living Community Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Review C. Highway 55 Watermain Discussion D. Resolution to Contract with a Council Member (Hwy 55 Rental for Medina Celebration Day) IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XII. ADJOURN Posted 8/11/2017 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: August 10, 2017 DATE OF MEETING: August 15, 2017 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Appoint Andrew Scharf to Police Officer Position — Based on the final scoring of applicants, committee interviews, and background/reference checks, staff recommends the appointment of Andrew Scharf to the position of police officer contingent on him passing his Minnesota POST Board exam, which he is scheduled to take on August 10, 2017. Mr. Scharf has verbally accepted the position with a starting date of August 16, 2017, contingent on City Council approval. See attached memo. B. Approve Job Description and Authorize Recruitment for Community Service Officer Position — Staff recommends approving the job description and beginning the recruitment process to replace Community Service Officer Andrew Scharf as he transitions to a licensed Police Officer position at the City of Medina. See attached job description. C. Resolution Granting Conditional Use Permit Approval to David and Katherine Crosby for a Second Principal Dwelling at 2402 Hamel Road — The City Council reviewed this request at their August 2, 2017 meeting and directed staff to prepare the attached resolution for approval. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. VI. PRESENTATIONS A. Resolution Awarding the Sale of $1,235,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2017A — An Ehler's Representative will be present at the City Council Meeting to discuss the results of the bond sale for the Deer Hill Road Project. See attached resolution. Recommended Motion: Move to adopt the resolution awarding the sale of general obligation improvement bonds, series 2017A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,235, 000; fixing their form and specifications; directing their execution and delivery; and providing for their payment VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Arrowhead Holdings, LLC — Preliminary/Final Plat; Lot Combination - 4101 Arrowhead Drive - Arrowhead Holdings, LLC desires to rearrange the lot line between 4101 Arrowhead Drive (the lot containing the Open Systems International (OSI) headquarters) and the adjacent vacant outlot to the southeast. This rearrangement would allow for an expansion of the OSI parking lot to the southeast to accommodate increased parking for OSI's expanding employment. See attached report. Recommended Motion #1: Move to adopt the resolution granting preliminary and final plat approval of the Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition. Recommended Motion #2: Move to adopt the resolution granting approval of the lot combination of 4101 Arrowhead Drive and Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition. B. Medina Senior Living Community Rezoning, Preliminary Plan, and Site Plan Review — Lunski, Inc. has made an application for a rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan review for development of a three-story 90-unit senior housing building, a two-story medical office building, and a vacant lot for future development. The property is located north of Highway 55, west of Mohawk Drive, and south of Chippewa Road. The site is 10.8 acres in size. There is a 2.6 acre wetland on the lot. Much of the site is wooded. See attached report. Potential Motion #1: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution granting preliminary plat approval subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. Potential Motion #2: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution granting site plan review approval, but only upon receipt and review of plans from the applicant which reduce the wetland impacts and address comments of the Elm Creek Watershed and City Engineer. C. Highway 55 Watermain Discussion — In 1985 Medina installed a trunk watermain linking the well fields on the east side of town to the water tower on the west side. At the time, the watermain was placed within the ROW on Highway 55 out of the drive lanes for ease of access, less costly maintenance and repairs. As the years have passed, the highway has been widened in several areas making access difficult, repairs very costly, and increasing the potential for high impact to vehicular traffic. Along with the pipe being under the highway in some places, the pipe is also aging and beginning to break more frequently. Staff is working with the City Engineer as to options available to address our current 2 situation, including a replacement pipe, pipe lining, pipe bursting, or other viable options. Staff will provide an update at the City Council meeting. See attached report. D. Resolution to Contract with a Council Member (Hwy 55 Rental for Medina Celebration Day) — The City of Medina rents, as well as purchases, items from Highway 55 Rental each year for Medina Celebration Day, but because one of the City Council members, Jeff Pederson, has an interest in Highway 55 Rental, the city needs to pass this resolution. If competitive bids are not required, the city may do business with a company where a councilmember has an interest if a resolution is adopted. At the meeting, a non -interested councilmember makes a motion to adopt the resolution. Before voting, the interested councilmember should state, and it should be recorded in the minutes, that he is abstaining from voting on the resolution because he has a financial interest in the contract. The motion must be passed by a unanimous vote of the remaining council. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. Recommended Motion: Adopt resolution to contract with a council member. XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 004250E-004275E for $55, 778.66, order check numbers 046195-046253 for $212,218.39, and payroll EFT 0508075-0508105 for $47, 955.79. • Planning Department Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List 3 DRAFT 2 3 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 2, 2017 4 5 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on August 2, 2017 at 7:00 6 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Mitchell presided. 7 8 I. ROLL CALL 9 10 Members present: Anderson, Cousineau, Pederson, Martin, and Mitchell. 11 12 Members absent: None. 13 14 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer 15 Jim Stremel, City Planner Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Chief 16 of Police Ed Belland. 17 18 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:00 p.m.) 19 20 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:00 p.m.) 21 The agenda was approved as presented. 22 23 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:00 p.m.) 24 25 A. Approval of the July 18, 2017 Special City Council Meeting Minutes 26 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to approve the July 18, 2017 special City 27 Council meeting minutes as presented. Motion passed unanimously. 28 29 B. Approval of the July 18, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 30 It was noted on page two, line 18, it should state, "...to solidify confirm..." 31 32 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to approve the July 18, 2017 regular City 33 Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 34 35 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:02 p.m.) 36 37 A. Resolution No. 2017-57 Accepting Bids and Awarding the Contract for the 38 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project to Hydro-Klean LLC 39 B. Approve Tree Trimming Services Agreement with Emery's Tree Service, 40 Inc. 41 C. Resolution No. 2017-58 Approving Off -Site Gambling Permit for the Hamel 42 Lions Club to Conduct Lawful Charitable Gambling at 3200 Mill Drive 43 D. Resolution No. 2017-59 Granting Preliminary and Final Plat Approval for 44 Hamel Road Thirty Two 45 Moved by Pederson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 46 passed unanimously. 47 48 VI. PRESENTATIONS 49 50 A. Resolution No. 2017-60 Recognizing Jeremiah Jessen for 10 Years of 51 Service to the City of Medina (7:03 p.m.) Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 August 2, 2017 1 Mitchell read aloud the draft resolution recognizing Jeremiah Jessen for his 10 years of 2 service to the City of Medina with the police department. He expressed his appreciation 3 for Jessen's continued excellent work. 4 5 Jessen stated that he is very fortunate to work for the City of Medina and he is always 6 proud to say he works for the City of Medina. He thanked the citizens of Medina and 7 noted that the police department appreciates working for the community. 8 9 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to adopt resolution no. 2017-60 recognizing 10 Jeremiah Jessen for 10 years of service to the City of Medina. Motion passed 11 unanimously. 12 13 B. Resolution No. 2017-61 Recognizing Anne Klaers for 10 Years of Service to 14 the City of Medina (7:06 p.m.) 15 Mitchell read aloud the draft resolution recognizing Anne Klaers for her 10 years of 16 service to the City of Medina. He thanked her for her hard work at the City. 17 18 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to adopt resolution no. 2017-61 recognizing 19 Anne Klaers for 10 years of service to the City of Medina. Motion passed 20 unanimously. 21 22 Belland stated that he cannot speak highly enough for Jessen and Klaers and could not 23 ask for better employees. He stated that they both continue to work hard and contribute 24 a lot to the police department. He stated that he appreciates the work that they do every 25 day and thanked them for 10 years of service. 26 27 Mitchell stated that the Council and administration appreciates the work the police 28 department does. He stated that they are all in this together and that is how they will 29 continue to make Medina a great place. 30 31 VII. COMMENTS (7:10 p.m.) 32 33 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 34 There were none. 35 36 B. Park Commission 37 Scherer stated that the parks are in good shape and are being well used this time of 38 year. 39 40 C. Planning Commission 41 Finke reported that the Planning Commission will meet the following week to consider a 42 PUD Concept Plan from the Excelsior Group which would include 68 single-family 43 homes. He noted that the second hearing would be a proposed plat and lot 44 rearrangement from OSI to expand their parking lot and the third hearing would be a 45 variance request to replace their trash enclosure in order to support the County Road 46 116 project. He stated that the Commission will also once again consider the Lunski 47 project and also an ordinance amendment regarding the Wood Lake Landfill in Medina. 48 49 VIII. NEW BUSINESS 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 August 2, 2017 1 A. Buddy and Kim Snow — Conditional Use Permit for 2nd Principal Dwelling — 2 2402 Hamel Road (7:14 p.m.) 3 Mitchell stated that this is his niece and nephew but he does not have a financial interest 4 in the project and therefore does not believe he has a conflict of interest. 5 6 Finke presented a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request for a second principal dwelling 7 noting that one of the stipulations is that the second home would only be available for 8 family members, employees or as a guest house and could not be rented out. He stated 9 that there is a home and barn existing on the site and provided an aerial photograph 10 identifying the proposed location of the secondary homes. He also highlighted the 11 proposed locations for the primary and secondary septic sites for both homes. He noted 12 that a ghost plat was also included to show how the property could be divided in the 13 future, should the homes need to be sold separately. He stated that the Planning 14 Commission held a public hearing the previous month and recommended unanimous 15 approval of the request. He stated that staff also recommends approval of the request 16 subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. 17 18 Kim Snow stated that she has two older brothers and the agreement they have always 19 had was to keep the property in their family. She stated that the plan was to move there 20 once her parents passed on but with her mother's health conditions they would like to 21 move to the property sooner in order to help and enjoy the property with all three 22 generations. 23 24 Mitchell asked if the application would need to be changed if the use changes from 25 family to a guest house. 26 27 Finke explained that the three allowed uses would be available without changing the 28 CUP. 29 30 Mitchell stated that the applicants are listed as the Snows but the Crosbys are the 31 owners of the property and asked if they would sign the documents as well. 32 33 Finke explained that the owners of the property have also signed the application 34 documents in addition to the Snows. 35 36 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to direct staff to prepare a resolution of 37 approval for the Conditional Use Permit request of Buddy and Kim Snow for a second 38 principal dwelling at 2402 Hamel Road, based upon the findings noted in the staff report 39 and subject to the conditions in the report. Motion passed unanimously. 40 41 IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (7:23 p.m.) 42 43 A. Agreement by and between the City of Medina and Process System 44 Integration Regarding Stockpiling on PID 03-118-23-32-0007 45 Johnson presented an agreement for stockpiling for fill at the Medina Senior Living site. 46 He stated that the applicant is requesting to place fill on the site prior to receiving 47 approvals for the site. He noted that a $250,000 letter of credit would also be required 48 that would cover the removal of the fill, should the applicant not receive development 49 approvals and leave the site. 50 51 Pederson asked about the hauling route. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 August 2, 2017 1 2 Finke replied that the hauling would come directly from Highway 55. 3 4 Anderson stated that he spoke with Finke earlier regarding potential noise concerns and 5 was reassured that the hauling would take place during the regular construction hours 6 and there would not be much impact. 7 8 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the agreement by and 9 between the City of Medina and Process System Integration regarding stockpiling on 10 PID 03-118-23-32-0007. Motion passed unanimously. 11 12 B. Recognition 13 Johnson stated that the City's reporter, Susan Van Cleaf, has covered the City of 14 Medina for 15 years and thanked her for the exceptional job she does. 15 16 Susan stated that she has enjoyed the different stories and the people of Medina. 17 18 Mitchell stated that it would be appropriate to have the Council direct staff to prepare a 19 letter thanking Susan for her work. 20 21 Moved by Pederson, seconded by Martin, to direct staff to prepare a letter thanking 22 Susan Van Cleaf for her 15 years of service reporting on the City of Medina. Motion 23 passed unanimously. 24 25 C. Broadband Grant 26 Johnson stated that unfortunately DEED did not agree to modify Mediacom's broadband 27 grant and therefore the grant could not be applied to 2017 and 2018 buildout in Medina. 28 Mediacom will have to submit a new grant application to DEED for the remaining 29 approximately 6 miles of buildout in 2018 in Medina. He asked for approval from the 30 Council on a letter of support for Mediacom's grant application. 31 32 Martin suggested a revision to the first paragraph of the letter. 33 34 Anderson suggested that a sense of urgency be expressed as well. 35 36 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to support Mediacom's grant application. 37 Motion passed unanimously. 38 39 D. Update 40 Johnson stated that he and Finke had a conference call with the Metropolitan Council 41 staff to review the draft Comprehensive Plan. 42 43 Finke stated that this information will be presented to the Steering Committee for further 44 action as questions were raised regarding the staging of high density housing. He 45 stated that the staging would not meet the requirements of the Met Council. He was 46 confident that the comments were not consistent with the policies of the Met Council and 47 believed that an appropriate narrative would clear up the misconception. 48 49 Martin stated that she would like input from the Council. She stated that there is no 50 place else that is right for high density residential that would meet the objectives of the 51 City to minimize the impact on the Wayzata School District and the traffic on Highway Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 August 2, 2017 1 55. She stated that if the property developed between 2018 and 2020 will not qualify as 2 high -density housing, those units simply should not be allowed to develop until 2020. 3 4 Anderson agreed that going out to identify additional land would disrupt the public input 5 process that took place. 6 7 Martin stated that the applications for high density housing are not coming in from 8 Medina residents and therefore delaying that development would not impact Medina 9 residents. She stated that she would also like clarity on the use of senior assisted living 10 as high density. 11 12 Finke stated that there will be a lot of those discussions through the Steering Committee 13 and then back through the City Council. 14 15 Martin stated that she would like to hear the position of the Council because until the 16 discussions are complete with the Met Council, the Council should not be hearing any 17 applications for those properties. 18 19 Anderson asked if there were additional comments on any other topics. 20 21 Finke stated that there were additional comments on the long-term City sewer area, but 22 noted that was to be expected. 23 24 Cousineau stated that there are additional business acres that could be used for senior 25 living and believed that needs to be evaluated as well, since all the commercial along 26 Highway 55 would roll into the business district under the new Comprehensive Plan. 27 28 Martin stated that she is unsure that those units would count as density units. 29 30 Finke stated that the units would not count traditionally but would impact the future 31 forecasts for the City. 32 33 Cousineau stated that she would prefer that the use be taken out of the business zoning 34 district as that would add people that the City did not commit to. She stated that perhaps 35 the business zoning district be amended to only allow housing in a certain portion of it. 36 37 Anderson stated if the Metropolitan Council does not understand that the staging for high 38 density would fulfill their objective, he would support Martin's comment in then delaying 39 that development until 2020. 40 41 X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (7:43 p.m.) 42 Mitchell stated that Night to Unite took place the night before and thanked staff, police 43 and fire and volunteers that helped to make the night a success. He reviewed a list of 44 places that the Council, police, fire, and staff were able to visit. He stated that the 45 purpose is for people to get to know their neighbors and City staff, police and fire to 46 encourage a sense of community. He appreciated the staff, Council and police that 47 attended parties the previous night and congratulated everyone on a successful event. 48 49 Martin commented on the joyful interaction between the police officers and children of 50 the community. She commended the police for having such a wonderful team that Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 August 2, 2017 1 interacts so well with the community and the youth. She thanked Belland for his great 2 leadership. 3 4 Belland also thanked the Council, noting that leadership begins at the top and he 5 appreciated the participation of the Council in the event as well. He stated that having 6 great leadership makes his job so much easier and noted that City staff is aware of how 7 well they have it with this great leadership team. He stated that for law enforcement, it is 8 important to build relationships in the community to know the people that you are 9 working to protect and serve. 10 11 XI. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (7:47 p.m.) 12 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to approve the bills, EFT 004231E-004249E 13 for $60, 685.72, order check numbers 046132-046194 for $193, 071.79, and payroll EFT 14 0508049-0508074 for $47,847.16. Motion passed unanimously. 15 16 XII. ADJOURN 17 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to adjourn the meeting at 7:48 p.m. 18 Motion passed unanimously. 19 20 21 22 23 Bob Mitchell, Mayor 24 Attest: 25 26 27 Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 August 2, 2017 Agenda Item # 5A MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council FROM: Chief Ed Belland and HR Representative Jodi Gallup DATE OF REPORT: August 8, 2017 DATE OF MEETING: August 15, 2017 SUBJECT: Police Officer Appointment General Background With the open Police Officer position after the release of a probationary officer, the City Council authorized staff to post and conduct a hiring process to fill the position at the May 2, 2017 City Council meeting. Based on the final scoring of applicants, committee interviews, and background/reference checks, we are recommending the appointment of Andrew Scharf to the position of police officer contingent on him passing his Minnesota POST Board exam, which he is scheduled to take on August 10, 2017. Mr. Scharf has verbally accepted the position with a starting date of August 16, 2017, contingent on City Council approval. Appointee Background Mr. Scharf currently serves as a Community Service Officer (CSO) with the City of Medina. He has served as our CSO since September 21, 2016. He previously worked 2 1/2 years as a CSO for the City of Maple Grove and has 3 years of experience as a Reserve Deputy for Sherburne County Sheriff's Office. Mr. Scharf is almost finished completing his Bachelor's Degree in Criminal Justice through St. Cloud State University and will graduate at the end of this summer. He has completed his Minnesota POST Skills training and is scheduled to take his MN POST Board exam on August 10, 2017. The entire department is excited about the opportunity to have Mr. Scharf join our team. The Police Department has confidence in his abilities, communication, character, and problem solving skills in law enforcement. Selection Process • The City Council approved the job description and directed staff to recruit for a full-time Police Officer position on May 2, 2017. • Advertisements for the position were published through the League of Minnesota Cities, POST website, and the City Website. • 37 applications were received, reviewed and scored on May 24, 2017 by Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup, Police Sergeant Jason Nelson, and Police Administrative Assistant Cec Vieau. • The top 22 applicants were invited to an initial "Meet and greet" oral interview and written test on June 8th, but 18 candidates showed up. The oral interview was 1 conducted with Chief Belland, Sergeant Nelson, Administrative Assistant Vieau and Assistant City Administrator Gallup. • The top 6 candidates (combined test and oral interview scores) were invited back for an interview with three of our police officers, Council member Cousineau, and a Medina business owner on June 13th. The interview panel scored the candidates and recommended the top three return for a final interview. • Chief Belland and Sergeant Nelson conducted final interviews with the top three finalists and recommended Andrew Scharf as the top candidate. The other finalists have been put on an eligibility list in the event we have an opening within the next year. • The Medina Police Department conducted an extensive background check on Mr. Scharf, which he passed. Mr. Scharf also completed the physical and psychological exams which he also passed. • Chief Belland tentatively offered the position to Mr. Scharf on August 2, 2017, and he verbally accepted that same day. His starting date will be August 16, 2017, with an hourly wage (non-exempt) of $24.06/hr., vacation to begin accruing at 10 days per year with one personal floating holiday, and other benefits to be at the same rate as other union employees, in accordance with the City Personnel Policies. Following a one year probationary period, Mr. Scharf s performance will be reviewed, with a positive review Mr. Scharf will become a non -probationary employee and move to pay STEP 2 in the union contract on August 16, 2018. Mr. Scharf has been notified that our recommendation is contingent upon City Council approval. Recommendation We recommend the appointment of Andrew Scharf to the position of full-time Police Officer, effective August 16, 2017, with an hourly wage (non-exempt) of $24.06/hr., vacation to begin accruing at 10 days per year, and other benefits to be at the same rate as other union employees, in accordance with the City Personnel Policies. Following a one year probationary period, Mr. Scharf s performance will be reviewed with a possible raise up to STEP 2 of the union contract on August 16, 2018. 2 MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Agenda Item # 5B p: 763-473-9209 f: 763-473-8858 non -emergency: 763-525-6210 Emergency 9-1-1 TO: City Administrator Scott Johnson and City Council FROM: Chief Ed Belland DATE: August 9, 2017 RE: Filling of the Open CSO Position With the hiring of Community Service Officer (CSO) Andrew Scharf as our next patrol officer, I would request permission to post and recruit for applicants to fill the open CSO position. Attached is the job description for the CSO position. I would ask the Medina City Council for their permission to move forward with the hiring of a part-time CSO to fill the open position. City of Medina Position Description COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER Position Title: Community Service Officer Department: Police Department Supervisor's Title: Patrol Sergeant Pay Grade: $16.00 to $18.00/hour DOQ FLSA Status: NON-EXEMPT Work Status: Part-time, temporary PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF POSITION To provide a variety of public safety and other municipal services, including, but not limited to, crime prevention, animal control, packet deliveries, equipment maintenance, property control, limited code enforcement, investigation, and follow up on nuisance complaints, and other duties not requiring a sworn police officer. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF POSITION • Patrols City streets and responds to non -emergency calls assigned. • Works with the City Planning Depaitiiient to observe, report, and enforce the City's nuisance ordinance. • Impounds at -large dogs and found dogs. • Assists the public with questions involving community service related topics. • Investigates and writes reports on animal bites, medical emergencies, found property, and other miscellaneous complaints. • Assists the public in the recovery of lost or stolen animals. • Assists in identifying found animals, notifying owners when necessary. • Provides emergency medical assistance and life support as a first responder. • Transports police evidence to appropriate agency for examination. • Assists in squads upkeep; takes the squads in for scheduled maintenance. • Performs housekeeping duties, (ie. garage, booking room, evidence room.) • Performs house checks. • Assists officers with traffic control. • Delivers necessary paperwork to the City attorney's office, Ridgedale Court, and City officials. • Observes and reports violations of the nuisance ordinance. • Performs other duties as assigned. OTHER DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES • Assists with general office duties, typing and filing reports, entering data, and answering phones. • Works with the CJIS and NCIC systems. • Assists the administration as directed. • Assists public at the front window with report request, burn permits, and hunting permits. • Assists with inventory of recovered property. • Maintains the inventory of need forms and equipment. • Maintains business directories for CAD. • Coordinates Crime Prevention programs. • Assists with evidence preparation for court. • Provides good working habits and a willingness to cooperate with others and contribute in a positive way to a pleasant working climate. HIRING AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES • Knowledge of principles, procedures, techniques and equipment of law enforcement. • Knowledge of pertinent Federal, State and local laws, codes and regulations. • Knowledge of City geography. • Skill to handle animal restraint and care techniques. • Skill to keep records and file maintenance systems. • Skill and principles of report preparation. • Ability to work with operational hazards and standard safety practices. • Ability to use methods and techniques in conflict resolution. City Council Approved: City of Medina Position Description COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER ■ Ability to maintain physical condition necessary for sitting, standing, or walking for prolonged periods; light to moderately heavy lifting and carrying; may be required to climb, stoop, kneel in performance of the job responsibilities; general manual dexterity; adequate vision, speech, and hearing required; must be able to operate assigned equipment. AUTHORITY: This position is specifically limited to aiding and assisting regular police officers and the administrative staff in the performance of their duties or acting upon the rights as a citizen of the State of Minnesota. By ordinance this position has limited authority to issue citation for certain misdemeanor violations. Conduct and actions are controlled by depai lenient policy. FIREARMS: The use of a firearm will be limited to the use of a shotgun for the dispatching of injured or sick animals. Each Community Service Officer will be trained in the use of the shotgun. They will have to qualify and show proficiency annually. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ■ A minimum of 18 years of age. ■ Enrolled in a post -secondary two or four year criminal justice or law enforcement degree program. ■ Possess a valid Minnesota Driver's License. ■ Possess good judgment and common sense. ■ Must be able to tolerate stress in a multitude of forms, such as taking enforcement action, dealing with anxious and emotional persons. ■ Work rotating shifts. ■ First responder training. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS Experience with community service, computer maintenance, working with animals, public relations and public presentations. WORKING CONDITIONS: Combination of outside environment and office environment. Outside environment, exposure to inclement weather conditions. Office environment exposure to computers and working closely with others. City Council Approved: Agenda Item # 5C Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 2017-## RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL TO DAVID AND KATHERINE CROSBY FOR A SECOND PRINCIPAL DWELLING AT 2402 HAMEL ROAD WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, David P. Crosby and Katherine P. Crosby (the "Owners") own property located at 2402 Hamel Road (the "Property"), which is 71.5 acres in size and is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Katherine Crosby Snow and Buddy L. Snow (the "Applicants") are the daughter and son-in-law, respectively, of the Owners and have requested a Conditional Use Permit on behalf of the Owners to construct and occupy a second principal dwelling on the Property; and WHEREAS, a second principal dwelling is permitted on Rural Residential properties over 40 acres in size, subject to review and approval of a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the requested conditional use permit on July 11, 2017, heard testimony from the Applicant, City staff, and interested parties, and recommended approval subject to certain conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the request at the August 2, 2017 meeting, reviewed the testimony and recommendation of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, following such review the City Council made the following findings: 1) The proposed second dwelling is consistent with the specific requirements for the conditional use as described in 826.98 of the City Code, subject to the conditions noted in this resolution. 2) The proposed second dwelling is consistent with the general criteria described for conditional uses in Section 825.39 of the City Code. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby approves the conditional use permit for David and Katherine Crosby at 2402 Hamel Road, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) The dwellings may not be conveyed separately and shall be under common ownership, unless the Property is subdivided to create a conforming lot for each dwelling under then - Resolution No. 2017-## August 15, 2017 current regulations. If the Property is subdivided, this conditional use permit shall become null and void. 2) The second dwelling on the Property shall be only occupied by members of the property Owners' family, by persons employed on the Property, or as a guest house. 3) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in the amount sufficient to pay for all costs associated with the review of the application for Conditional Use Permit. Dated: August 15, 2017. By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: By: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017-## 2 August 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property The East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 118, Range 23, Except that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principle Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence East along the south line of said Southeast Quarter a distance of 815 feet; thence deflecting left 87 degrees 40 minutes a distance of 520 feet; thence deflecting left 88 degrees a distance of 175 feet; thence deflecting right 38 degrees c distance of 83 feet; thence deflecting left 19 degrees 30 minutes to the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South to the point of beginning. According to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Resolution No. 2017-## 3 August 15, 2017 Agenda Item # 6A Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in said City on Tuesday, August 15, 2017, commencing at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: *** The Mayor announced that the next order of business was consideration of the proposals which had been received for the purchase of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2017A, to be issued in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,235,000. The City Administrator presented a tabulation of the proposals that had been received in the manner specified in the Terms of Proposal for the Bonds. The proposals were as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached. After due consideration of the proposals, Member then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2017A, IN THE ORIGINAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $1,235,000; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Sale of Bonds. 1.01 Authority. It is hereby determined that: (a) Certain assessable public improvements known as the 2017 Deerhill Improvement Project in the City (collectively, the "Improvements") have been made, duly ordered or contracts let for the construction thereof pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475, as amended (collectively, the "Act"). (b) It is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue its General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2017A (the "Bonds"), in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,235,000, to provide financing for the Improvements. (c) The City is authorized by Section 475.60, subdivision 2(9) of the Act to negotiate the sale of the Bonds, it being determined that the City has retained an independent municipal advisor in connection with such sale. The actions of the City staff and the City's municipal advisor in negotiating the sale of the Bonds are ratified and confirmed in all aspects. 1.02. Award to the Purchaser and Interest Rates. The proposal of (the "Purchaser") to purchase the Bonds of the City is hereby found and determined to be a reasonable offer and is hereby accepted, the proposal being to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ (par amount of $1,235,000, [plus original issue premium of $ ,] [less original issue discount of $ ,] less underwriter's discount of $ ), plus accrued interest to date of delivery, if any, for Bonds bearing interest as follows: Year of Interest Year of Interest Maturity Rate Maturity Rate 2020 % 2026 2021 2027 2022 2028 2023 2029 2024 2030 2025 2031 True interest cost: 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 2 1.03. Purchase Contract. The sum of $ , being the amount proposed by the Purchaser in excess of $1,220,180, shall be credited to the Debt Service Fund hereinafter created or deposited in the Construction Fund hereinafter created, as determined by the City's Finance Director in consultation with the City's municipal advisor. The Finance Director is directed to retain the good faith check of the Purchaser, pending completion of the sale of the Bonds, and to return the good faith checks of the unsuccessful proposers. The Mayor and City Administrator are directed to execute a contract with the Purchaser on behalf of the City. 1.04. Terms and Principal Amounts of the Bonds. The City will forthwith issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to the Act in the total principal amount of $1,235,000, originally dated September 7, 2017, in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, numbered No. R- 1, upward, bearing interest as above set forth, and maturing serially on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: Year of Maturity 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Amount * Term Bonds Year of Maturity 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Amount 1.05. Optional Redemption. The City may elect on September 8, 2017, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2020. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC (as defined in Section 7 hereof) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. [1.06. Mandatory Redemption; Term Bonds. To be completed if Term Bonds are requested by the Purchaser.] Section 2. Registration and Payment. 2.01. Registered Form. The Bonds will be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 2.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond will be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first interest payment date, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 2018, to the registered owners of record 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 3 thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not that day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City will appoint a bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating agent and paying agent (the "Registrar"). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto are as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar must keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar provides for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of a Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until that interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. When Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar will authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. Bonds surrendered upon transfer or exchange will be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When a Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the Bond until the Registrar is satisfied that the endorsement on the Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar will incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name a Bond is registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of the Bond, whether the Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on the Bond and for all other purposes and payments so made to registered owner or upon the owner's order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. The Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof for a transfer or exchange of Bonds, sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. If a Bond becomes mutilated or is destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar will deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 4 Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that the Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it and as provided by law, in which both the City and the Registrar must be named as obligees. Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar will be cancelled by the Registrar and evidence of such cancellation must be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it is not necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Redemption. In the event any of the Bonds are called for redemption, notice thereof identifying the Bonds to be redeemed will be given by the Registrar by mailing a copy of the redemption notice by first class mail (postage prepaid) to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books kept by the Registrar and by publishing the notice if required by law. Failure to give notice by publication or by mail to any registered owner, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of Bonds. Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided that the funds for the redemption are on deposit with the place of payment at that time. 2.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City appoints Bond Trust Services Corporation, Roseville, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with the Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, the resulting corporation is authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar must deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and must deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of the City Council, the Finance Director must transmit to the Registrar monies sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.05. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds will be prepared under the direction of the Finance Director and executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator, provided that those signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be such officer before the delivery of a Bond, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, a Bond will not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on the Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on a Bond is conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Administrator will deliver the same to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser is not obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.06. Temporary Bonds. The City may elect to deliver in lieu of printed definitive Bonds one or more typewritten temporary Bonds in substantially the form set forth in EXHIBIT B such changes as may be necessary to reflect more than one maturity in a single temporary bond. Upon the execution and delivery of definitive Bonds the temporary Bonds will be exchanged therefor and cancelled. 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 5 Section 3. Form of Bond. 3.01. Execution of the Bonds. The Bonds will be printed or typewritten in substantially the form as attached hereto as EXHIBIT B. 3.02. Approving Legal Opinion. The City Administrator is directed to obtain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, which is to be complete except as to dating thereof and to cause the opinion to be printed on or accompany each Bond. Section 4. Payment; Security; Funds; Pledges and Covenants. 4.01. Debt Service Fund. The Bonds are payable from the General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2017A Debt Service Fund (the "Debt Service Fund") hereby created, and the proceeds of special assessments levied or to be levied (the "Assessments") for the Improvements described herein are hereby pledged to the Debt Service Fund. There is appropriated to the Debt Service Fund (i) capitalized interest financed from Bond proceeds, if any; and (ii) amounts over the minimum purchase price of the Bonds paid by the Purchaser, to the extent designated for deposit in the Debt Service Fund in accordance with Section 1.03 hereof. 4.02. Construction Fund. The proceeds of the Bonds, less the appropriations made in Section 4.01 hereof, together with any other funds appropriated for the Improvements and Assessments collected during the construction of the Improvements, will be deposited in a separate construction fund (the "Construction Fund") to be used solely to defray expenses of the Improvements and the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds prior to the completion and payment of all costs of the Improvements. Any balance remaining in the Construction Fund after completion of the Improvements may be used to pay the cost in whole or in part of any other improvement instituted under the Act under the direction of the City Council. When the Improvements are completed and the cost thereof paid, the Construction Fund is to be closed and subsequent collections of Assessments for the Improvements are to be deposited in the Debt Service Fund. 4.03. City Covenants. It is hereby determined that the Improvements will directly and indirectly benefit abutting property, and the City hereby covenants with the holders from time to time of the Bonds as follows: (a) The City has caused or will cause the Assessments for the Improvements to be promptly levied so that the first installment will be collectible not later than 2019 and will take all steps necessary to assure prompt collection, and the levy of the Assessments is hereby authorized. The City Council will cause to be taken with due diligence all further actions that are required for the construction of each Improvement financed wholly or partly from the proceeds of the Bonds, and will take all further actions necessary for the final and valid levy of the Assessments and the appropriation of any other funds needed to pay the Bonds and interest thereon when due. (b) In the event of any current or anticipated deficiency in Assessments, the City Council will levy ad valorem taxes in the amount of the current or anticipated deficiency. (c) The City will keep complete and accurate books and records showing receipts and disbursements in connection with the Improvements and Assessments levied therefor and other funds appropriated for their payment, collections thereof and disbursements therefrom, monies on hand and, the balance of unpaid Assessments. 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 6 (d) The City will cause its books and records to be audited at least annually and will furnish copies of such audit reports to any interested person upon request. (e) At least twenty percent (20%) of the cost of the assessable Improvements described herein will be specially assessed against benefited properties. 4.04. General Obligation Pledge. If a payment of principal of or interest on the Bonds becomes due when there is not sufficient money in the Debt Service Fund to pay the same, the Finance Director is directed to pay such principal or interest from the general fund of the City, and the general fund will be reimbursed for those advances out of the proceeds of Assessments when collected. 4.05. Debt Service Coverage. It is hereby determined that the estimated collections of Assessments will produce at least five percent (5%) in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds at that no tax levy is needed at this time. 4.06. Certificate of Taxpayer Services Division Manager as to Registration. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Taxpayer Services Division Manager of Hennepin County, Minnesota and to obtain the certificate required by Section 475.63 of the Act. Section 5. Authentication of Transcript. 5.01. City Proceedings and Records. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other certificates, affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in their custody and under their control, relating to the validity and marketability of the Bonds, and such instruments, including any heretofore furnished, may be deemed representations of the City as to the facts stated therein. 5.02. Certification as to Official Statement. The Mayor, City Administrator, and Finance Director are authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the Official Statement prepared and circulated in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Official Statement is a complete and accurate representation of the facts and representations made therein as of the date of the Official Statement. 5.03. Other Certificates. The Mayor, City Administrator, and Finance Director are hereby authorized and directed to furnish to the Purchaser at the closing such certificates as are required as a condition of sale. Unless litigation shall have been commenced and be pending questioning the Bonds or the organization of the City or incumbency of its officers, at the closing the Mayor, the City Administrator, and the Finance Director shall also execute and deliver to the Purchaser a suitable certificate as to absence of material litigation, and the Finance Director shall also execute and deliver a certificate as to payment for and delivery of the Bonds. 5.04. Payment of Costs of Issuance. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to KleinBank, Chaska, Minnesota, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's municipal advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 7 Section 6. Tax Covenant. 6.01. Tax -Exempt Bonds. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the Bonds. 6.02. No Rebate Required. (a) The City will comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the Bonds under Section 103 of the Code, including without limitation requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States, if the Bonds (together with other obligations reasonably expected to be issued in calendar year 2017) exceed the small -issuer exception amount of $5,000,000. (b) For purposes of qualifying for the small issuer exception to the federal arbitrage rebate requirements, the City finds, determines and declares that the aggregate face amount of all tax-exempt bonds (other than private activity bonds) issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued and outstanding at one time is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000, all within the meaning of Section 148(f)(4)(D) of the Code. 6.03. Not Private Activity Bonds. The City further covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to cause or permit them or any of them to be used, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 6.04. Qualified Tax -Exempt Obligations. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the Code; (b) the City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than any private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2017 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2017 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. 6.05. Procedural Requirements. The City will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 8 Section 7. Book -Entry System; Limited Obligation of City. 7.01. DTC. The Bonds will be initially issued in the form of a separate single typewritten or printed fully registered Bond for each of the maturities of the Bonds as described in Section 1.04 hereof. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of each Bond will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns ("DTC"). Except as provided in this section, all of the outstanding Bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. 7.02. Participants. With respect to Bonds registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent will have no responsibility or obligation to any broker dealers, banks and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository (the "Participants") or to any other person on behalf of which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds, including but not limited to any responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any Participant or any other person (other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown by the registration books kept by the Registrar) of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of Bonds, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar as the holder and absolute owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal, premium and interest with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all other purposes. The Paying Agent will pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or on the order of the respective registered owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, and all such payments will be valid and effectual to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, will receive a certificated Bond evidencing the obligation of this resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the City Administrator of a written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the words "Cede & Co." will refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt of such a notice, the City Administrator will promptly deliver a copy of the same to the Registrar and Paying Agent. 7.03. Representation Letter. The City has heretofore executed and delivered to DTC a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations (the "Representation Letter") which shall govern payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and notices with respect to the Bonds. Any Paying Agent or Registrar subsequently appointed by the City with respect to the Bonds will agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the City in the Representation Letter with respect to the Registrar and Paying Agent, respectively, to be complied with at all times. 7.04. Transfers Outside Book -Entry System. In the event the City, by resolution of the City Council, determines that it is in the best interests of the persons having beneficial interests in the Bonds that they be able to obtain Bond certificates, the City will notify DTC, whereupon DTC will notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of Bond certificates. In such event the City will issue, transfer and exchange Bond certificates as requested by DTC and any other registered owners in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event, if no successor securities 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 9 depository is appointed, the City will issue and the Registrar will authenticate Bond certificates in accordance with this resolution and the provisions hereof will apply to the transfer, exchange and method of payment thereof. 7.05. Payments to Cede & Co. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution to the contrary, so long as a Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond and notices with respect to the Bond will be made and given, respectively in the manner provided in DTC's Operational Arrangements, as set forth in the Representation Letter. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. 8.01. Execution of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. "Continuing Disclosure Certificate" means that certain Continuing Disclosure Certificate executed by the Mayor and City Administrator and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof. 8.02. City Compliance with Provisions of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, failure of the City to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Certificate is not to be considered an event of default with respect to the Bonds; however, any Bondholder may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this section. Section 9. Defeasance. When all Bonds and all interest thereon have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds will cease, except that the pledge of the full faith and credit of the City for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will remain in full force and effect. The City may discharge all Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full. If any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 10 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 11 EXHIBIT A PROPOSALS 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 A-1 EXHIBIT B FORM OF BOND No. R- $ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF MEDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BOND SERIES 2017A Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue February 1, 20_ September 7, 2017 Registered Owner: Cede & Co. CUSIP The City of Medina, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing municipal corporation in Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City"), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above or registered assigns, the principal sum of $ on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above (calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), payable February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2018, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by Bond Trust Services Corporation, Roseville, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Paying Agent, Transfer Agent and Authenticating Agent, or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. The City may elect on September 8, 2017, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2020. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $1,235,000 all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, redemption privilege, and interest rate, all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on August 15, 2017 (the "Resolution"), for the purpose of providing money to defray the expenses incurred and to be incurred in making local improvements, pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475, as amended, and the principal hereof and interest hereon are payable primarily from special assessments against property specially benefited by local improvements, as set forth in the Resolution to which reference is made for a full statement of rights 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 B-1 and powers thereby conferred. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for payment of this Bond and the City Council has obligated itself to levy ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City in the event of any deficiency in special assessments pledged, which taxes may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. The City Council has designated the issue of Bonds of which this Bond forms a part as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limit allowed by the Code for the calendar year of issue. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar will be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required, and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile or manual signatures of the Mayor and City Administrator and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: September 7, 2017 CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA (Facsimile) (Facsimile) Mayor City Administrator 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 B-2 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION By Authorized Representative ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, will be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants in common TEN ENT -- as tenants by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts or Transfers to Minors Act, State of Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: Signature Guaranteed: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 B-3 NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a financial institution that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program ("STAMP"), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program ("SEMP"), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signatures Program ("MSP") or other such "signature guarantee program" as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, SEMP or MSP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Bond Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the infonnation concerning the assignee requested below is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if this Bond is held by joint account.) Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the principal of and interest on the within Bond has been registered on the books of the Registrar in the name of the person last noted below. Date of Registration Signature of Registered Owner Officer of Registrar Cede & Co. Federal ID #13-2555119 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 B-4 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF MEDINA ) SS. I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Medina, Minnesota (the "City"), do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on August 15, 2017, with the original minutes on file in my office and the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2017A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,235,000. WITNESS My hand officially as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 2017. City Clerk City of Medina, Minnesota (SEAL) 505044v2 JAE ME230-635 Agenda Item # 8A MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: August 9, 2017 MEETING: August 15, 2017 City Council SUBJ: Arrowhead Holdings, LLC — Preliminary/Final Plat; Lot Combination - 4101 Arrowhead Drive Review Deadline Complete Application Received: July 30, 2017 60-day Review Deadline: September 28, 2017 Summary of Request Arrowhead Holdings, LLC desires to rearrange the lot line between 4101 Arrowhead Drive (the lot containing the Open Systems International (OSI) headquarters) and the adjacent vacant outlot to the southeast. This rearrangement would allow for an expansion of the OSI parking lot to the southeast to accommodate increased parking for OSI's expanding employment. Rather than just replatting the lot and outlot to shift the lot line, the applicant has requested a two-step process which would: 1) Subdivide the vacant 3.4 acre outlot at the northwest corner of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive into a lot and a (reduced size) outlot; and 2) Immediately afterwards combine this small lot to the larger OSI property. The applicant desires this process for their own real estate and financing reasons. The subject properties are zoned Commercial -Highway. The property to the north is currently zoned mixed use, but proposed to be reguided to Business in the draft 2040 Comp Plan. Property to the northeast is currently rural lots, planned for Low Density Residential in the draft 2040 Comp Plan. An aerial can be found at the top of the next page. Proposed Lots The existing OSI lot is 20.02 acres and the existing Outlot is 3.4 acres. The applicant proposes to shift 1.15 acres from the Outlot into the OSI lot, resulting in the OSI lot being 21.17 acres and the outlot being 2.23 acres. Because the application is proposing to subdivide the outlot and then subsequently combine a portion of the property into the OSI lot, the City has to review the "lots" at each step of the process. The following tables summarize the requirements of the CH district and the proposed "lots" following the initial subdivision and then also following the subsequent lot combination. It appears that the proposed lots meet all dimensional standards following both the initial subdivision and the subsequent lot combination. Arrowhead Holdings, LLC Page 1 of 4 August 15, 2017 Preliminary/Final Plat; Lot Combination City Council Meeting Initial Subdivision: CH Requirement Lot Created, Immediately Outlot A Combined with OSI Lot Min. Lot Size 1 acre 1.15 acre 2.23 acre Min Lot Width 100 feet 194 feet 350 feet Min Lot Depth 120 feet 258 feet 345 feet Subsequent Lot Combination: CH Requirement Outlot A Proposed OSI Lot After Combination Min. Lot Size 1 acre 2.23 acre 21.17 acre Min Lot Width 100 feet 350 feet 596 feet Min Lot Depth 120 feet 345 feet 1725 feet Front Setback 25 feet N/A 587 feet Rear Setback 25 feet N/A 345 feet Side Setback 15 feet N/A 136 feet Res. Setback 50 feet N/A N/A Hwy 55 Setback 50 feet N/A 211 feet Parking Setbacks Front 25 feet N/A 232 feet Rear/Side 10 feet N/A 40 feet Street Setback 25 feet N/A 25 feet Res Setback 40 feet N/A N/A Max Hardcover 75% 0% 28.8% Arrowhead Holdings, LLC Preliminary/Final Plat; Lot Combination Page 2 of 4 August 15, 2017 City Council Meeting The lot line is being adjusted in order to accommodate a future expansion of the OSI parking lot. No other development is proposed at this time. As a result, development matters such as traffic, landscaping, and the like are not reviewed at this time in connection with the plat or lot combination. The parking lot expansion would be reviewed through relevant Site Plan Review provisions for compliance with code. This would likely be an administrative review because of the size of the expansion. Right-of-way and Easements The property owner dedicated right-of-way for Arrowhead Drive during the original subdivision of the property in 2009. The City Engineer did not recommend additional right-of-way in connection with this plat. MnDOT was routed on this request and also did not request additional right-of-way. The applicant proposes new drainage and utility easements on each side of the new property line between the OSI lot and the outlot. Park Dedication During the initial subdivision of this property back in 2009, the applicant requested to defer park dedication for the Outlots until these areas were developed in the future. Now that a portion of Outlot C is proposed to be added to the OSI lot and developed, staff believes it is appropriate to impose the deferred fees. The City is allowed to require up to 10% of the buildable property (.115 acres for the land being added to the OSI lot) or 8% of the market value. In 2009, the cash -in -lieu fee for the OSI lot was determined to be $5,124.35 per acre. It is likely that this number is slightly low because land values have increased since 2009. For example, the current taxable market value of Outlot C is $345,000, or $102,071 per acre, which would result in a fee of $8,165.68 per acre. However, staff believes it is reasonable to use the 2009 amount since the property is not proposed to be further subdivided. The City's subdivision ordinance would permit the City to utilize the current pre -developed market value. If the City Council determines it is appropriate to use the 2009 fee calculation, this would result in a park dedication fee of $5,893.00 for the 1.15 acres being combined with the OSI lot and developed. Review Criteria/Planning Commission Recommendation According to Subd. 10 of Section 820.21 of the subdivision ordinance, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one or a combination of the following finding are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. Arrowhead Holdings, LLC Page 3 of 4 August 15, 2017 Preliminary/Final Plat; Lot Combination City Council Meeting (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the requested plat at the August 8 meeting. No one spoke at the hearing. Following review, the Planning Commission did not make any of the findings for denial and recommended approval of the attached resolutions granting approval of the plat and the lot combination. Potential Actions If the City Council finds that the plat does not violate one of the findings noted above, the following motions would be in order: Move to adopt the resolution granting preliminary and final plat approval of the Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition. Move to adopt the resolution granting approval of the lot combination of 4101 Arrowhead Drive and Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition. Attachments 1. Document List 2. Excerpt from DRAFT 8/8/2017 Planning Commission minutes 3. Resolution granting preliminary and final plat approval 4. Resolution granting lot combination approval 5. Preliminary Plat 6. Final Plat 7. Survey showing proposed lot combination Arrowhead Holdings, LLC Page 4 of 4 August 15, 2017 Preliminary/Final Plat; Lot Combination City Council Meeting Project: LR-17-209 — OSI Plat and Lot Combination The following documents are included in the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 6/28/2017 6/28/2017 3 Y Y App from owner received 7/31 Fee 6/28/2017 6/27/2017 1 Y Y $5000 Preliminary Plat 6/28/2017 6/19/2017 1 Y Y Final Plat 6/28/2017 1 Y Y Parking Lot Plans 6/28/2017 6/9/2017 4 Y Y Title Commitment 7/31/2017 7/5/2017 9 Y Y O&E Report 7/31/2017 7/21/2017 4 Y Y Response Letter 7/31/2017 7/30/2017 1 Y N Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Legal Comments 7/10/2017 1 Y MnDOT Comments 7/12/2017 2 Y Legal Notice 7/28/2017 3 Y 5 pages w/ list and affidavit Preliminary Review 7/20/2017 2 Y Planning Commission report 8/3/2017 4 Y 8 pages w/ attachments City Council report 8/9/2017 4 Y 15 pages / attachments Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes Planning Commission minutes 8/8/2017 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT August 8, 2017 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing — Arrowhead Holdings LLC — 4101 Arrowhead Drive — Preliminary and Final Plat for Subdivision and Lot Combination Finke stated that the applicant is seeking to shift the boundary between the OSI property and neighboring lot. He noted that the applicant is seeking to do this through a two-step process of a subdivision and then lot combination. He stated that the purpose of the lot line rearrangement would accommodate extra parking for the OSI property. He reviewed the zoning of the subject properties and adjacent properties. He identified the portion of the property that would be combined with the OSI property and the outlot that would be created. He stated that the new lot and outlot would need to meet relevant standards and then the lot combination would be considered. He noted that the required standards would be met through the proposed request. He stated that the park dedication was deferred in 2009 and therefore one of the conditions was that any subsequent development would trigger that deferred dedication. He stated that the 2009 fee specified was $5,893 and staff would support using that fee as the use of the property would not be intensified. He stated that potential findings for the subdivision request were included in the packet, noting that staff supports the two requests subject to the conditions noted and the addition of the park dedication. Reid asked if OSI already owns this property. Finke reported that the City of Minneapolis owns the OSI property, as it was created through economic development and Arrowhead Holdings is the technical property owner. Nester asked if the parking lot was undersized to begin with. Finke replied that the company has been growing and filling the space more than the zoning code would have anticipated. Nester asked if this would solve the under parked situation. The applicant stated that the sizing would meet the capacity of the building. He stated that there are plans to expand to the north in the future. He stated that this last piece of parking would ensure that the occupancy of the building is addressed. He stated that this would be 118 additional stalls. He stated that often the number of stalls are correlated to the number of employees, but noted that there are a lot of clients that come into the building for months at a time and also remote employees and interns that come in for months at a time. White opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. No comments made. White closed the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. Motion by Reid, seconded by DesLauriers, to recommend approval of the Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition and the subsequent lot combination, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report, with the additional condition that the deferred park dedication be paid. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Albers, Amic and Murrin) 1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 2017-## RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Arrowhead Holdings, LLC (the "Owner") owns property located at the northwest corner of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive (the "Property"), which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Owner has requested preliminary and final approval of a plat to subdivide the Property into a lot and an outlot; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed plat on August 8, 2017, heard testimony from the Owner, city staff, and interested parties and recommended approval of the plat; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed plat at the August 15, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has, subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, made the following findings of fact with regards to the requested plat: (a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not premature, as defined in City Code Section 820.28. (b) The physical characteristics of this site appear suitable for the type of development contemplated and the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause environmental damage or cause public health problems. (c) The resulting parcel meets minimum lot size standards and the density of development is consistent with City regulations. (d) The design of the subdivision will not conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants preliminary and final plat approval for the plat received by the City on August 10, 2017, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Owner shall meet the requirements of the City Attorney with regards to plat corrections and title documentation; Resolution No. 2017-## August 15, 2017 2. The Owner shall pay a park dedication fee of $5,893.00 in -lieu of dedicating additional land for parks and trails purposes. 3. The plat shall be filed with Hennepin County within 180 days of the date of the city council resolution granting final approval or the final plat shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Owner and approved by the City Council; and 4. The Owner shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary and final plat and related documents. Dated: August 15, 2017. By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: By: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017-## 2 August 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Outlot C, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota Resolution No. 2017-## 3 August 15, 2017 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 2017-## RESOLUTION GRANTING LOT COMBINATION APPROVAL FOR 4101 ARROWHEAD DRIVE AND LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the city of Minneapolis, Minnesota ("Minneapolis") owns property located at 4101 Arrowhead Drive ("Parcel 1"), which is legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Arrowhead Holdings, LLC ("Arrowhead Holdings") owns property located at the northwest corner of Highway 55 and Arrowhead Drive ("Parcel 2"), which is legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Arrowhead Holdings intends to convey Parcel 2 to Minneapolis, which intends to combine Parcel 2 with Parcel 1 to create a single, larger parcel; and WHEREAS, Arrowhead Holdings and Minneapolis (jointly, the "Applicants") have requested approval for a lot combination of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 into a single parcel; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed lot combination on August 8, 2017, heard testimony from the Applicants, city staff, and interested parties and recommended approval of the combination; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed lot combination at the August 15, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has, subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, made the following findings of fact with regards to the requested plat: (a) The proposed combination is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not premature, as defined in City Code Section 820.28. (b) The physical characteristics of this site appear suitable for the type of development contemplated and the design of the combination is not likely to cause environmental damage or cause public health problems. (c) The resulting parcel meets minimum lot size standards and the density of development is consistent with City regulations. Resolution No. 2017-## August 15, 2017 (d) The design of the combination will not conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants approval for the lot combination of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The legal description of the combined lot shall be as displayed in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 2. Approval of the lot combination is contingent upon recording of the plat of Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition. 3. The Applicants shall meet the requirements of the City Attorney with regards to title documentation, and recording instructions. 4. The Applicants shall record necessary documents to effectuate the lot combination within 180 days of the date of the city council resolution granting approval or such approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Owner and approved by the City Council. 5. The Applicants shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the combination and related documents. Dated: August 15, 2017. By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: By: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017-## 2 August 15, 2017 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Lot after Combination Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota AND Lot 1, Block 1, Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Resolution No. 2017-## 3 August 15, 2017 A \/ v A n I \I I v A I I ARROWHEAD HOLDINGS, LLC 2" Locust 2" \ Tree G ----___I-------....-- __ c, �S \ -Inv.���:: \ 994�5 � �0 _•.. • �� .� ��. �� �G �� \: \G\ --C\ .. G �C, � �G \ �G \ G� \ c� \ G \ c �< c� G\ r I I • I �/ I I f- I I /' Owner: / 1 3" Locust 3" Locust Maple Birch 8 Top 1005.12 v. 991.15 \ • �96' / /\ n • rs �1 1\ / 998 / ' A c //i / r`� ,,/ V,� F 2' Birch Birch ��010 i Y/ I A / //� ^ / Y I 1 r 1 i `/ i i i l I L / I PP 4 6" Spruce i r F\FCC Birch / F� 2 F� irc Birch F Birch irch •„ 2" Birch ---. c � <� -s.c� \ G\ 1 L- I A 1 I Owner: ARROWHEAD HOLDINGS, LLC / 2„ F\ / Birch 1F\F l Birch l " Birch F 3" Birch A , 3" Hyd. Birch 8" , 1" Birch 3 Birch c� MH Top 9 •. 3 Inv: "-98 15 G\ r, \ CB Top 996.70 • 99 6 996 E - E- N86°10'59"E L�\ e s \ \ E Drainage and Utility Easement per CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK _ 990 G c� CB Top 995.64 Sign Top 989.32 Inv. 975.72 6 66.�2� �� r inv� Inv � 982.90 • M H LL1 Top 99 .0 Inv. 96 .4 1 h / Top 988.22 Prelminary Plat of: CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK SECOND ADDITION GV " s G A3. 1 * Bearings shown are based on the plat of CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK. * Contact Gopher State One for utility locations before any construction shall begin. Phone 651-454-0002. * Zoning: CH (Commercial Highway) 15 30 60 90 Scale in Feet S Sanitary Sewer — ST— Storm Sewer Watermain Hydrant Gate Valve Manhole Catch Basin Cleanout Flared End Invert Elevation Power Pole Light Pole Electrical Transformer Telephone Pedestal Concrete Surface Bituminous Surface Buried Gas — C— Buried Communications — E— Buried Electric DEVELOPER OSI 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, Minnesota 55340 Phone: 763-551-0559 Attention: Adam Schlafke Arrowhead Holdings, LLC 4101 Arrowhead Drive Medina, Minnesota 55340 Attention: Ronald Ingram Rehder & Associates, Inc. Suite 110 3440 Federal Drive Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Phone: 651-452-5051 Attention: Greg Gentz PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Outlot C, CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this preliminary plat was prepared by me or under my direction and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 19th day of June, 2017 RENDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 5171 Gary C. Huber, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 22036 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS JOB: 174-2445.019 A / CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION n 1 ICI I � A ,-� 0 25 50 I 1 I 1 �/ /� I � I I I- -4 I I o1Z) 0 z • • k 2 / / ;, / /"._ I 4,4C/ / / / h / / / / 100 150 Scale in Feet / n I I A \/I I r- L- 7g4 • 0g The southwesterly line of Outlot C, CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK has a bearing of N69°58'14"W. O Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument set and marked by Minnesota License No. 22036 A ,-� r� I 1 L � / I 1 / 446906, 1 J / r r S; 0 /A� / `v/ �v/ I. / v v /, /, /, / / / / I / / / I r� I I L / / 2 / / / / 0 66 9g N86°10'59" E s OUTLOT I A r I � s16 8 28_ 4 Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: o 5 _15 5 51_ o Being 5 feet in width and adjoining lot lines and being 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines unless otherwise indicated on the plat. r� •••� . •� �� 218.75 A <>. 0 a 62.72 I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • , AI r0 •6 n'I V� ----- �° 1 D` /- S� N N co N N S4°5 a7U 4 J < i I \ C.R. DOC. NO. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Arrowhead Holdings, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: Outlot C, CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK SECOND ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Arrowhead Holdings, LLC, a Minnesota limited liablility company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 2017. ARROWHEAD HOLDINGS, LLC By Ronald J. Ingram, Vice President and Secretary STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 2017, by Ronald J. Ingram, Vice President and Secretary of Arrowhead Holdings, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the coompany. Notary Printed Name Notary Public, My Commission Expires I, Gary C. Huber do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 2017. Gary C. Huber, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 22036 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF DAKOTA This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 2017, by Gary C. Huber. Notary Printed Name CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA Notary Public, , County, Minnesota My Commission Expires This plat of CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS SECOND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 2017. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30-day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. City Council, City of Golden Valley, Minnesota By , Mayor By , Administrator/Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the taxes payable in 2017 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this day of , 2017. Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By: , Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MN. STAT. Section 3836.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota day of By: , 2017. I hereby certify that the within plat of CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION was filed in this office this o'clock .M. Martin McCormick, County Recorder day of , 2017, at By: , Deputy Rehder and Associates, Inc. / A 1 / A Al A II /\ 1 1/ I \/ /‘ I/ / 1 1\ I / 1 / \ V / 1 1 V / \ \ / \ / 1 1 s.. \ \ \ •9 \ 7 \ \ \ CATES RANCH b( DRIVE I _- 0 \ \ \ \ KATRINKA ROAD 74 CHIPPEWA �O P �0 i -5 'g()8 o� PP N N ���... . Oo NCpp O ���... \ \ \ ss ROAD Vicinity Map / / S88°39'29"E 149.45 N69032 �543 s0S F z \\ DRAINAGEUTILITY \ AND o 0,\ EASEMENT / mil▪ \ //g \\ A/80°11 ' 17 / /k51�• �1 29.58 W / \ \ \ \ \ \ / y / A /4 /1//A / y 4 A l/ A Section 3, Township 118, Range 23 No Scale \ \ �X C,00 N \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ _ / / / A / / V / I i / Y LEGEND • Iron Monument Found 0 Iron Monument Set S—Sanitary Sewer - ST— Storm Sewer w— Watermain Hyd. -6- Gv • GM MH0 CB O CO 0 • St PPS LP E❑ HH❑ Hydrant Gate Valve Gas Meter Manhole Catch Basin Cleanout Flared End Guard Post Sign Power Pole Light Pole Electrical Transformer Handhole Concrete Surface Bituminous Surface Brick Paver Surface - G Buried Gas - E Buried Electric 4. V A) 332.51 / `1 -.../.....• I / /- c; \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r- / / / ,r \�/�<\ / \ Z r� F� L / \ v /1"ky eh ,...\" eo \.. o .it-4. es \.:: .. \.:: . \.::. . 13 \... . \..� . . \.::'� .. PP E----. \ \ , / / / / \ / l Y \ \ , / / A //I /,�� / / y/ I, • \ \ 0 \ 25 \ \ \ A 1/ / Y Y / ;=/ �r / 50 I v Cy z _{ A r• / 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 L / \ / L _ _ A/80°0 1,0g.. W 103.87 \ \ 100 \ �s T b MH 150 Scale in Feet Boundary and Location Survey for: ARROWHEAD HOLDINGS, LLC at 4101 Arrowhead Drive — Medina, Minnesota 1 A / 1 A / 1/1/ I/I/ y V V V 0,53414/4G4- Hy LP 76* UTILITY STATEMENT The underground utilities shown have been located from field survey information and existing drawings. The surveyor makes no guarantee that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated, although he does certify that they are shown as accurately as possible from information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. GV LP 16 LP * Bearings shown are based on the plat of CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK. * Utilities shown are from information furnished by the City of Medina, Minnesota Department of Transportation and Wright — Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association in response to Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 112071978. * Contact Gopher State 1 for utility locations before any construction shall begin. Phone 651-454-0002. * Number of parking stalls on site = 301 regular and 7 handicap. * This property is located in Flood Zone X (area outside .2% annual chance flood plane) and Flood Zone A (area of 1 annual flood (100—year flood) per Flood Zone Map No. 27053C0165E E dated September 2, 2004. No base flood elevation have been determined for Flood Zone A. AND OP EASEMENT MH LLI GV PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MH Lot 1, Block 1, CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK and Lot 1, Block 1, CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (NOTE: THE PLAT OF CAVANAUGHS MEADOWWOODS PARK SECOND ADDITION IS CURRENTLY IN THE APPROVAL PROCESS AND HAS NOT BEEN RECORDED AT THIS TIME) I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direction and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 9th day of August, 2017 REHDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary C. Huber, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 22036 GV Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS JOB: 174-2445.013 Agenda Item # 8B NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina City Council FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: August 9, 2017 MEETING DATE: August 15, 2017 RE: Medina Senior Living Community Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Review CITY FILE: LR-17-204 Application Date: June 19, 2017 Review Deadline: August 18, 2017 (120-day extension: October 17, 2017) BACKGROUND Lunski, Inc. has made an application for a rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan review for development of a three-story 90 unit senior housing building, a two-story medical office building, and a vacant lot for future development. This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in February as a Concept Plan. The Concept was for an 80 unit senior building, a medical/office building, and a commercial building. The Planning Commission discussed the rezoning as being generally acceptable. However, there were concerns voiced about the size of the project being too intense for the site. The Council discussed concerns about parking, building height, and wetland impacts. The applicant removed the commercial building from the site and increased the amount of parking provided, and increased the number of independent/assisted living units. PROJECT SITE The property is located north of Highway 55, west of Mohawk Drive, and south of Chippewa Road. The site is 10.8 acres in size. There is a 2.6 acre wetland on the lot. Much of the site is wooded. ZONING / COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The subject site is guided for a Commercial land use in the current Comprehensive Plan and Business in the proposed 2020 - 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The property is zoned RCH, Rural Commercial Holding which is an interim designation for land awaiting urban development. This area is identified for urban development, at this time. PROPOSED REZONING The applicant proposes to rezone the property to B, Business District, which would be consistent with the direction the City is heading in the draft 2020 - 2040 Comprehensive Plan. "Nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and independent living facilities associated with such uses" are a permitted use within this District. In the 2010 - 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which is still in effect until the 2020 - 2040 Plan is adopted, this site is guided for a Commercial land use which contemplates "commercial, office, and retail uses" that are "concentrated along the TH 55 corridor." The Business zoning district was designed more to implement the Business land use in the 2010 - 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Commercial -Highway district was designed for the Commercial land use. However, because the City has contemplated changing the land use of the subject site to Business in the draft 2020 - 2040 Plan, any rezoning would ideally be generally consistent with the 2010 - 2030 Comprehensive Plan and not in conflict with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Commercial and Business land uses share a similar set of objectives within the 2010-2030 Comp Plan, rather than each having a unique list. As such, it could be argued that the rezoning to Business is not inconsistent with the 2010 - 2030 Commercial land use, especially within the context of the proposed change to Business in the draft 2020 - 2040 Plan update. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant is proposing to divide the parcel into three lots and an outlot. The outlot is intended for a private street. Lot 1 is a 3.39 acre site intended for future development. Lot 2 is a 3.08 acre site that is intended to house the senior facility. Lot 3 is a 3.81 acre lot for a medical clinic/office building. The minimum lot size is 3 acres in the B District. The minimum lot width in the B District is 175 feet with a minimum lot depth of 175 feet. It appears that all lots meet these standards. Lot Area Upland Area Width Depth B District Standards 3 acres N/A 175 feet 175 feet Lot 1 3.39 acres 2.64 acres 175 566 Lot 2 3.08 acres 2.13 acres 245 457 Lot 3 3.81 acres 2.99 acres 175 705 The Park Commission reviewed the plan and recommended cash -in -lieu of parkland dedication in the amount of $262,500, less an appropriate credit for the proposed private trails on the site. SITE & BUILDING PLAN REVIEW Site Access/Transportation The site is proposed to be accessed by a 24 foot private street off of Chippewa Road. The street is on the plan within Outlot A. The entirety of the road would need to be contained within the outlot. The City's Subdivision Ordinance requires private streets to meet City road standards. The outlot will need to be owned by an association to which all lots would be members for maintenance of the road. The proposed private street is not centered in the proposed outlot. The applicant states that this is due to grade changes towards the western property line and to balance the need for spacing between the access point to the west and wetlands to the east. Drainage and utility easements should be enlarged along the outlot to a minimum of 20 feet subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. This also results in the trail along the drive being on the individual lots. The trail should be placed within an easement to ensure it may be used by all site users. The City Engineer requested a traffic study and additional information has been requested. This information will determine the necessity of any turn lanes or improvements at nearby intersections. The City Engineer believes the development may necessitate turn lanes at some point in the future, and recommends a petition and waiver to pay for this improvement when needed. Also, this property will contribute to the need for the future extension of Chippewa Road to the east. Staff recommends securing future contribution to this project. Senior Housing Building The senior facility is proposed with 90 units and about 100,000 square feet. There are 32 one bedroom, 14 two - bedroom, 29 studio units, 10 memory care, and 5 special care units. The units range from roughly 450 square feet for the studio, 580 square feet for the one bed room, and 900 for the two -bedroom units with some variation. The special and memory care units are smaller. There are 48 garage stalls proposed on the lowest level of the building. The applicant has indicated that up to forty-five of the units may be utilized for "independent living." The B District allows for assisted living facilities with independent living "associated" with the use. This would appear to require 50% of the units, at minimum, to be assisted living with the remaining independent units to be age restricted. Of the 45 assisted living units, 15 are proposed to be memory/special care. The proposed building is three stories tall. The average roof height to adjacent grade is 44' 2.5". The B District allows building heights of 30 feet, 35 feet with sprinklers, and 45 feet with necessary conditions required by the fire marshal. Required yard setbacks are required to be increased for buildings greater than 35 feet in height by the amount they exceed 35 feet in height. This would be an additional 9 feet. In the B District, all exterior building materials are required to meet the following standards: (a) A minimum of 20 percent of the building exterior shall be brick, natural stone, stucco (not Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product), copper, or glass. (b) A maximum of 80 percent may be decorative concrete, split face (rock face) decorative block, and/or decorative pre -cast concrete panels. Decorative concrete shall be color impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance. (c) A maximum of 20 percent may be wood, metal (excluding copper), fiber cement lap siding or Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product, if used as accent materials which are integrated into the overall building design. The proposed building is 19% masonry, 17% stone, 8% lap siding, 26% stucco, and 30% glass. This appears to meet the requirements for the exterior finish. The lap siding is cement fiber board. Building modulation is required for every 100 feet of horizontal length. The proposed structure is meeting this requirement. Medical Office Building The proposed medical/office building is two stories in height and about 25,000 square feet. The proposed floor plan is not very detailed and just shows general space. The plans state that average roof height to adjacent grade is 35' 6". The building appears to be meeting the building modulation requirements. The proposed building is 58% masonry, 8% "architectural wood veneer", 12% stucco, and 22% glass. This appears to be consistent with the required architectural standards. Skyway There is a proposed skyway between the two buildings. Existing regulations do not provide a means to allow an encroachment on required yards for such a structural element, unless the lots were combined as one lot. The Planning Commission recommended that the skyway be changed in appearance to better match the buildings. Lot 1 No construction is proposed for Lot 1, at this time. A demonstration building has been placed on the lot for conceptual review. Setbacks & Performance Standards Within the B District, the minimum front yard setback is 40 feet. This may be reduced to 30 feet for a private street. Setbacks to arterial roads are required to be 50 feet. Side and rear yard setbacks are required to be 25 feet, which may be reduced to 15 feet in order to accommodate shared site improvements. Yard setbacks are required to be increased for buildings greater than 35 feet in height. This would add slightly over 9 feet of required setback to the senior building and 6 inches to the setback of the medical/office building. The building location has been adjusted to meet the 50 foot setback. The senior building appears to be able to accommodate the extra 9 feet of setback to the private road and side and rear lot lines. Parking lots are required to have a 25 foot front yard setback, 25 feet to a street side yard, 20 feet for a street side yard to a private street, and 15 feet to the side and rear yard. The side and rear yard parking setback may be reduced in cases where the parking is shared, as is proposed in this situation. As proposed, it appears that these setbacks are generally met. In Section 832.2.06 it states that there is a 100 foot setback to residential zoned areas for both buildings and parking lots. The properties across Chippewa Road are zoned residential. The right-of-way is 66 feet in width, leaving at least 34 feet on the subject site to account for. The 40 foot front yard building setback would be greater than this distance and the applicant has adjusted the parking area to meet the requirements. The B District standards state that impervious surfaces are capped at 70% unless utilizing shared improvements when the limit may be raised to 80%. The applicant is currently proposing to meet this standard by using porous pavement. Tree Preservation & Landscaping Section 828.41 of the Zoning Ordinance states requirements for tree preservation. For a property of this size, the allowed significant tree (8 caliper inches in diameter) removal related to "initial site development" is 10%. Initial site development is the "grading and construction of streets, trails, and sidewalks; the installation of utilities including water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, natural gas, electric, and cable television; or the grading and construction of drainage ways and storm detention areas." Activities other than the initial site development are permitted at 15% removal of significant trees for lots of about 3 acres in size. This would allow for 15% removal of trees on the three lots being created for building sites. This results in a required replacement of 320.5 inches of trees for the development on Lots 2 and 3. The applicant intends to replace as many trees on the property as possible, but it will only be possible to replace a small portion of the trees on -site around the proposed improvements. In similar cases in the past, the City has accepted off -site planting as an alternative, or a cash contribution towards future off -site planting. The City has accepted $100 per inch of replacement in a previous example. The applicant has provided a landscaping plan that is intended to include replacement trees. The requirements for landscaping in the B District are 1 overstory tree per 50 feet of lot perimeter, 1 per 100 of ornamental trees, and 1 shrub per 30 feet on each lot. The site has 2791.18 linear feet of perimeter. Since the northern lot (Lot 1) is not being developed, its perimeter may be deducted and landscaping provided for at site plan review. This leaves 1759.89 feet of perimeter to be accounted for requiring 36 overstory trees, 18 ornamental trees, and 59 shrubs. The plan shows 69 overstory trees, 28 ornamental trees, and 128 shrubs. With this methodology, there would be 13 replacement trees provided. This would allow for 33 overstory trees (99 inches) to be counted towards replacement. Also, the trees provided are one half inch larger than required, which would allow for 18 additional inches. This results in 117 inches of replacement trees being provided reducing the initial replacement to 203.5 inches. All mechanical equipment, trash areas, and loading docks are required to be screened. Also, Section 828.07 requires screening from any commercial use to a residential use which would require screening on preliminary plat Lot 1. Lighting As required by Ordinance, a photometric lighting plan has been submitted for review. The subject site lies within Lighting Zone E4 which corresponds to areas which exhibit high ambient lighting levels. The zone generally includes urban areas with primary land uses for commercial, business and industrial activity (including highway commercial and downtown districts). According to the lighting plan, a total of 44 exterior fixtures are proposed upon the subject property as summarized below: Type Plan Symbol Height Quantity Arrangement Parking Lot Fixture (Commercial) A2 32 feet* 2 Back to back Parking Lot Fixture (Senior Residential) B4 & B5 22 feet* 11 Single Pedestrian Scale Fixture C 12 feet 13 Single Pedestrian Scale Fixture D 3.5 feet 13 Single Wall Sconce WP15 NA 5 Single * Referenced fixture height includes 2-foot pole base As shown, all proposed light fixtures meet the maximum pole height requirements of 32' - 6" (30 feet plus a pole base which does not exceed a height of 30 inches). Consistent with Ordinance requirements (for E4 zones), all fixtures are proposed to have an output of less than 2,000 lumens and are to be fully shielded such that light sources are not visible from adjacent properties and rights -of -way. Within E4 zones, the Ordinance stipulates that maximum lighting levels at the property line must not exceed 1.5 footcandles before curfew and 0.6 footcandles "after curfew." In review of the photometric lighting plan, it appears that maximum lighting levels at the property line measure 0.1 footcandles which conforms with Ordinance requirements. Signage In Section 815.11, the B District allows for one free standing sign per lot up to 80 square feet of sign area and 20 feet in height. Signs are required to be setback 10 feet from all property lines and outside of a clear vision triangle for a street or access drive. There are three free standing signs proposed. Sign locations have been modified to meet City Ordinance requirements. Off -Street Parking The plan currently has 216 stalls on the site. The parking areas are proposed to be shared. The City's parking ordinance states that the required parking is required to be on the parcel with the use generating the parking demand except in cases of shared or joint parking. This may be deemed acceptable provided there is an association in place to manage this common element adequately to ensure the proper amount of parking is provided at all times. Section 828.51 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that parking stalls be a minimum of 9' x 19' with a two-way drive aisle width of 22 feet. The City may require that primary drive aisles be increased to 24' in width. The plan generally shows the primary drive aisles with a 24 foot width and the secondary with a 22' width. The ordinance states that a maximum of 20% of the required stalls may be provided as compact car spaces, which are required to be a minimum of 8' x 16' in size. Section 828.51 Subd. 1 (j) states that "to the extent practicable, dead end drives shall not be permitted." There is a dead end drive aisle for parking on the east end of the medical/office building. A fire truck turn around and car turn around have been provided. The number of stall required for the medical/office building is based on 1 stall per 250 square feet. This results in a parking requirement of 100 stalls. The applicant is providing 33 stalls on the lowest level of the building and the remainder in the parking lots to satisfy the 100 stall requirement. The senior building does not have a specific number designated for required parking. Therefore, the Planning Commission is to review the parking and make a recommendation to the City Council. It is important to keep in mind that the required parking is to accommodate residents, guests, and employees. Fluctuations in the number of independent living units versus the assisted living units could alter the number of needed parking stalls. Therefore, it is very important that the proper number of stalls be provided on the site. City Staff reviewed the Institute of Transportation Engineers Standards Manual which recommends 0.4 stalls per unit for senior assisted living and 0.35 stalls per unit for memory/special care units. The remaining independent living units could defer to the City's multi -family parking standard for 2.25 stalls per unit. This would result in a parking requirement of 120 stalls. Forty-eight stalls are being provided in the lowest level of the building and the balance of parking are satisfied. The Planning Commission felt that the provided parking was sufficient. Some suggested that the applicant provide some of the parking in a "proof of parking" arrangement to be provided if needed later. However, the applicant has stated that they would likely need most of the required parking. Grading & Drainage In the B District standards, in Section 832.3.03, states that "site improvements shall be designed in a way which most effectively maintains predevelopment topography, drainage patterns and ecological functions." It also states that "drainage and stormwater improvements shall be designed with an emphasis on integrated stormwater management practices such as vegetative swales, filter strips, bioretention, and similar improvements as approved by the city rather than pipes and retention ponds." The applicant is using porous pavement for a portion of the parking lot, in order to meet impervious surface requirements. Specifications on this pavement type should be provided. Water quality modelling components will need to be identified. Wetlands There is a 2.6 acre wetland on the site. This wetland is identified as a "Manage 1" classification. This requires an upland buffer adjacent to the wetland with an average width of 30 foot. City requirements allow an averaging of the buffer width by narrowing in some locations and widening in others as long as a minimum of 20 feet in width is provided. The setback from a principal structure to the buffer is 15 feet and 5 feet for accessory structures. Private trails, parking areas, and structures are not permitted within the buffer. The applicant is proposing two areas of wetland impact. One is for the road and utilities to access the site. The other is to allow for the Senior Building to meet the upland buffer setbacks. The second impact is on the northwest corner of the Senior Building and could easily be avoided through the design of the building or layout of the site. Watershed District Staff stated that "additional impacts to meet the buffer are not desired, and the option of a variance would be difficult for staff to support. We certainly understand the need to for impacts to bring in the access to the site given access constraints. What is much less clear is why the building footprint and location cannot be modified to meet the required standards (a matter of 10 feet)." Alternative to this wetland impact would be to adjust the site arrangement, reduce the footprint of improvements on the lot, or seek a variance from the setback requirements. Staff believes it would be difficult to justify a variance in this case. The applicant has indicated that they can shift the building to eliminate (or nearly eliminate) the additional wetland impacts related to the wetland setback. Doing so will result in the loss of a few parking spaces. The applicant will present a visual of this shift at the City Council meeting. There is also a boardwalk proposed over the wetland. The WCA permit regarding the boardwalk and proposed fill is being reviewed but has not been approved, yet. Utilities The site will be serviced by sewer and water. The City Engineer has provided comments and requested revisions. Easements for utility mains may be required. Association Documents Due to the shared parking and the private street, a strong association will be required for this development. Draft covenants were provided and reviewed by the City Attorney. The Attorney recommended revisions to ensure that the association and not the developer is the declarant and that the easements be made to continue in perpetuity to ensure that the easements can't be terminated. Also, is was recommended that there not be clauses placing restrictions on the reciprocal agreements that would weaken the shared parking concept. The applicant should work with the City Attorney on making revisions to these documents. REQUEST REVIEW The applicant is proposing a rezoning to B, Business which will correspond with the 2010 - 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The 2010 - 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which is still in effect, identifies this parcel as Commercial. The General Business designation more directly corresponded with the Business District. The Comprehensive Plan discusses the two designations as follows: Commercial (C) provides areas for highway oriented businesses and retail establishments; can include commercial, office and retail uses; is concentrated along the TH 55 corridor and are served or will be served by urban services. General Business (GB) provides opportunities for corporate campus uses including light industrial and retail uses. This designation identifies larger tracts of land that are suitable for office and business park developments and are served or will be served by urban services. The purpose of the Business District is: "The purpose of the Business (B) district is to provide for a zoning district for a mix of office, high quality light industrial, and larger -scale retail and service uses with proximity to arterial roadways. Development shall include high quality and attractive building materials and architectural design as well as extensive landscaping in order to limit impacts on surrounding land uses, and shall be integrated and coordinated in a way to most efficiently utilize site improvements and to protect the natural environment." The rezoning will need to be found to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The site plan has some issues that will need to be corrected in order to meet all zoning requirements. In the Subdivision Ordinance it is stated that the City shall deny approval of a preliminary plat if one or a combination of the following finding are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The applicant is proposing to develop the property by putting two uses on two lots that share parking and utilize a private street. The two uses and the associated parking are fully utilizing the site and there appear to be some issues related to wetlands and tree removal. A third lot is being made available for future development that would also result in additional tree removal and storm water management issues. It would seem that an easy way to resolve the remaining issues would be to reduce the size of the senior building to avoid the additional wetland impacts and lessen the intensity of use on the site. However, if the applicant can resolve all issues to the satisfaction of the City Council, it may be appropriate for approval, provided the Council has no issue with the rezoning. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission found the project to be generally acceptable provided the applicant can meet the following conditions of approval: 1. A Mechanism shall be provided to ensure the senior building meets zoning requirements, including limitations on independent living units and required parking provisions. 2. The entire private road shall be within the Outlot. 3. The applicant shall meet tree replacement requirements 4. The Senior Building shall be adjusted or reduced in size to meet required setbacks. 5. The wetland impacts shall be subject to WCA review and approval. Impacts for the senior building shall be eliminated by adjusting the building size or location or impacts shall be approved through the WCA process. 6. The skyway shall be redesigned to match the architecture of the buildings and a mechanism for allowing such an encroachment shall be considered. 7. The applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver regarding future turn lane construction. 8. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City related to its contribution to the future extension of Chippewa Road. 9. Association documents shall be provided in the manner requested by the City Attorney and shall specifically address the parking being provided on the office property for the benefit of the senior housing building. 10. Park dedication shall be paid as recommended by the Parks Commission. 11. All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed District shall be addressed. 12. All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed. 13. The preliminary plat shall be updated to provide sufficient right-of-way for Chippewa Road and appropriate drainage and utility easements. 14. The applicant shall meet the requirements of the City Attorney with regards to title documentation. 15. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement to the City in a form and of substance acceptabled to the City Attorney to ensure compliance with the conditions of approval and relevant City requirements and policies. 16. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. 17. The final plat applicant shall be filed within 180 days of the date of the city council resolution granting preliminary approval or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 18. The applciant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, site plan review, and related documents POTENTIAL ACTION As noted above, the application includes three land use requests. The first request which staff recommends be considered is the rezoning to the Business zoning district. A draft ordinance which would rezone the property is attached for reference. If the City Council believes the rezoning is appropriate within the context of the current Commercial land use on the property as well as the proposed Business land use in the DRAFT 2020-2040 comprehensive plan, it would be appropriate to adopt the ordinance. Staff would recommend doing so in connection with the other applications at a future meeting. The second request for consideration would be the preliminary plat. If the Council does not make any of the findings above related to the subdivision ordinance, the following motion would be in order: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution granting preliminary plat approval subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. As noted above, the applicant is updating plans to reduce wetland impacts in order to eliminate the impacts which are a result of the building location. The applicant is also addressing comments of the watershed and city engineer. If the Council finds that the site plan for the senior housing and office building meet relevant ordinance requirements (taking into consideration the changes to be made), the following motion would be in order: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution granting site plan review approval, but only upon receipt and review of plans from the applicant which reduce the wetland impacts and address comments of the Elm Creek Watershed and City Engineer. Attached: Aerial Photo List of Documents Rezoning Ordinance Excerpt from DRAFT 8/8/2017 Planning Commission minutes Excerpt from 7/11/2017 Planning Commission minutes Excerpt from DRAFT 7/19/2017 Park Commission minutes Excerpt from minutes of City Council Concept Review (2/21/2017) Engineer's Comments received 8/9/2017 Elm Creek Watershed District Comments received 7/6/2017 Applicant's Narrative Preliminary Plat Plan Set dated 8/4/2017 03/20/2015 - 05/04/2015 Project: LR-17-204 — Lunski Senior Community Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 5/12/2017 5/12/2017 3 Y Y Fee 5/12/2017 5/12/2017 1 Y Y $11,000 Narrative 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 4 Y Y Narrative — Updated 8/4/2017 8/4/2017 5 Y Y Labels 6/19/2017 NA 1 Y Y Labels inaccurate; staff updated Plan Set 5/12/2017 5/12/2017 23 Y Y Plan Set — Updated 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 25 Y Y Plan Set — Updated 7/24/2017 7/20/2017 25 Y Y Plan Set — Updated 8/4/2017 8/4/2017 25 Y Y Soils Map 5/12/2017 5/12/2017 3 Y Y Traffic Analysis 5/12/2017 5/10/2017 66 Y Y Preliminary Plat 5/16/2017 5/12/2017 1 Y Y Preliminary Plat— Updated 7/24/2017 Not updated 1 Y Y Preliminary Plat— updated 8/4/2017 8/4/2017 1 Y Y Draft Covenants 6/19/2017 NA 19 Y Y Wetland Replace. App. 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 13 Y Y WCA Information 8/4/2017 8/4/2017 23 Y Y Stormwater Report 6/19/2017 6/16/2017 142 Y Y Stormwater Rep — updated 8/4/2017 8/42017 142 Y Y Arch Response 7/24/2017 7/17/2017 2 Y N Eng Response — Elm Creek 7/24/2017 7/19/2017 6 Y N Eng Response — traffic 7/24/2017 N/A 4 Y N Eng Response 7/24/2017 7/19/2017 5 Y N GeoTech Info 8/4/2017 2/12/2016 49 Y Y (continued on back) Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Legal Comments 5/25/2017 1 Y Legal Comments 6/28/2017 1 Y Building Official Comments 5/26/2017 1 Y Building Official Comments 6/26/2017 1 Y MnDOT Comments 6/1/2017 1 Y No Comments City Engineer Comments 5/30/2017 3 Y City Engineer Comments 7/6/2017 4 Y City Engineer Comments 8/9/2017 5 Y Elm Creek Watershed Comments 7/6/2017 9 Y No Recommendation Incomplete Letter 6/2/2017 2 Y Legal Notice 6/30/2017 19 Y Planning Commission Report 7/6/2017 9 53 pages w/ attachments Planning Commission Report 8/3/2017 8 Y 46 pages w/ attachments City Council Report 8/10/2017 9 Y Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes Planning Commission minutes 7/11/2017 Y Planning Commission minutes 8/8/2017 Y CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE PID 03-118-23-32-0007, LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHWAY 55 AND SOUTH OF CHIPPEWA ROAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The official zoning map of the City of Medina is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of PID 03-118-23-32-0007 (the "Property) from RCH, Rural Commercial Holding to B, Business. Section 2. The Property rezoned is legally described in Exhibit A and displayed in the map in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Section 3. The City of Medina Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to publish this ordinance and make the appropriate changes to the official zoning map of the City of Medina to reflect the change in zoning classifications as set forth above only upon approval of the final plat of the Property. Section 4. A copy of this Ordinance and the updated map shall be kept on file at the Medina City Hall. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption and publication. Adopted by the Medina City Council this day of , 2017. CITY OF MEDINA By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: By: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Published in the Crow River News on this day the Ordinance No. ### 1 DATE of , 2017. EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Being Rezoned THAT FART OF THE WEST 918.12 FEET OF THE NW Y4 OF THE SW Y4 LYI\G NORTHERLY OF HIGHWAY 55. EXCEPT THE WEST 75 F EXCEPT ROAD EET THEREOF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 118 RANGE 23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Ordinance No. ### 2 DATE EXHIBIT B Map Displaying Property Being Rezoned LOCATION OF PROPERTY TO BE REZONED TO BUSINESS (B) LOST HORSE RD PAWNEE 11 CHIPPEWA RD KATRINKA RD R4�E DR Ordinance No. ### 3 DATE I HACKANIORE RD RD —31414WNEE — f— Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT August 8, 2017 Meeting Minutes Continued Public Hearing — Dean Lunski — North of Highway 55, South Chippewa Road and West of Mohawk Drive — Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and Site Plan Review White asked and received confirmation that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning request at the last meeting. Sparks stated that this is a continued public hearing as the Planning Commission thoroughly reviewed this request at their last meeting. He provided an update on what has been done since the last review. He stated that this project would include a senior living and medical office space within one development. He stated that the applicant has addressed some issues while some issues remain. He stated that the tree preservation issue has been resolved with the plan for offsite replacement. He stated that the plan will be revised again to provide additional trees onsite. He stated that the landscaping plan was revised to be consistent throughout all plans. He stated that the lighting plan was adjusted to include signage lighting. He noted that the private street would still need to be placed within the outlot. He stated that a larger drainage and utility easement has been provided for the adjacent lots to support the off -center alignment. He stated that the Park Commission reviewed the request and recommend cash in lieu of land dedication for this request. He stated that the setback has been adjusted to meet the required setback. He stated that the proposed siding would be cement fiberboard lap siding and therefore would meet the architectural standards. He stated that the revised plan adjusted the parking lot location to ensure that it does not fall within a setback. He stated that sign locations have also been changed to ensure that setbacks are met. He stated that a fire truck turnaround has been provided and reviewed by the Fire Marshall and has been found to be acceptable. He noted that a parking stall has also been removed to provide a turnaround for vehicles. He stated that there are still issues with wetland setbacks and buffers. He stated that the eastern side of the building setback was measured to the base of the building, but has a large bump -out encroachment. He stated that the ordinance only allows two feet of encroachment for those bump -outs. He stated that the northwest corner proposes to fill the wetland in order to meet the buffer setback. He stated that the watershed is going to further review the request, as typically you do not fill a wetland just to meet a buffer. He noted that the issue on the eastern side would be an easy fix, but the western side would not be as easily solved. He stated that the item was continued at the last meeting and the Commission could either take action tonight or table the item to determine the outcome from the watershed. He stated that the watershed was not looking favorably at the filling of the wetland. He noted that approval could also be given contingent upon meeting the upland wetland buffers. He noted that proposed trails and gazebos have been removed from the upland buffer areas. Reid stated that the white skyway has not been updated either. She stated that the white skyway would not be appropriate with Medina and is disappointed that it has not been changed. She noted that it could be a first level breezeway instead to be less conspicuous. DesLauriers asked the intent of the skyway. Reid stated that the skyway is going to be used to move residents from the building to the medical offices. DesLauriers stated that the skyway would be needed to accommodate parking underneath. He agreed that the color change could be done. Reid stated that she would like the color change to be a condition of approval to ensure that is addressed. White reopened the public hearing at 8:27 p.m. Jeff Pederson noted that this is another example of how the Chippewa Drive extension to the east will be needed, as well as the loop for the watermain that will be necessary. White closed the public hearing at 8:27 p.m. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT August 8, 2017 Meeting Minutes Reid asked if staff is satisfied that the road and wetland buffer issue would be solved. White noted that could be part of the conditions of approval. Sparks stated that staff has been attempting to get that addressed for a while, but it is still not. Reid stated that the Commission gave the applicant one month to address the concerns of staff. She asked if the applicant has expressed a willingness to address the problems. DesLauriers stated that at the last review there were a number of comments that needed to be addressed before it would be appropriate to move it forward to the Council. He asked if most of the concerns had been addressed and whether the significant issues have been addressed. Sparks stated that the wetland buffer issue is a significant item that a lot of the comments resolve around. He stated that resolution could be easy if the applicant is willing to follow the necessary steps to resolve it, or could be difficult if the applicant chooses another path. Finke stated that if the item does not receive approval from the watershed, the item would not move forward for consideration from the City Council. He stated that the Commission can provide input on the wetland issue as that is still being considered by the watershed. Reid asked when the City would expect to hear back from the watershed. Finke provided a timeline, noting that the response would have to be received before the Council would consider the request. Reid stated that it is not the fault of the City that the necessary questions have not been answered. White asked if the Commission moved the application forward to the Council and the applicant updates plans to reduce wetland impacts, would it be presented again to the Commission. Finke stated that would depend on the type of changes that were made. He noted that the building and the parking lot could be made smaller to provide that additional space, and therefore that would not need to come back before the Commission. White stated that the applicant did a lot of what the Commission asked for, although they did not address everything. She stated that the wetland buffer item could be a stumbling block. She believed that the Commission could recommend approval with the condition that the wetland buffer criteria be met, as well as the additional conditions. Reid noted that she would like to add a condition that the skyway be redesigned to diminish visual impact and blend into the building architecture. Finke asked if there is a preference of the Commission as to whether the wetland is filled or setback is met. It was the consensus of the Commission that there was no preference. Motion by Reid, seconded by DesLauriers, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, rezoning, and Site Plan review for Lunski project, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report, with the additional conditions as detailed tonight. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Albers, Amic and Muffin) 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from July 11, 2017 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing — Lunski, Inc. — Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Review for a 90-Unit Senior Assisted Living/Independent Living Community and Office Building located North of State Hwv 55, South of Chippewa Road and West of Mohawk Drive (PID #03-118-23-32-0007) Sparks provided a summary of the request. He highlighted the changes that had been made to the plan since the Commission last saw the request in the Concept Plan review phase. He noted that there is some overlap in the commercial and business districts and therefore the rezoning could be appropriate. He reviewed some of the comments from the Park Commission in regard to park dedication and trails. He highlighted the proposed access and private street. He stated that there was a lot of discussion with the proposed access point at the Concept Plan review and the applicant has then moved the access point as far to the east as possible to create additional spacing between the neighboring parcel. He explained that an easement would be required for the trail to allow users of the sites to travel between the sites on the trail. He noted that larger than typical drainage and utility easements would be required for the private street. He stated that the private street falls within the outlot and therefore the outlot would need to be owned by the association to ensure the road would remain safe and up to standards. He stated that the City Engineer provided comments and requested additional information on the traffic study that was completed. He stated that a fire truck turnaround would be provided in lieu of a second emergency access. He reviewed the proposed mix of the units which would include independent living, assisted living and specialty/memory care units. He noted that the uses would need to be related with a minimum age for the independent living as regular multi -family housing would not be allowed in this zoning with the mix of assisted living. He reviewed the proposed parking which would include a mix of underground parking and surface parking. He reviewed the proposed building materials and design elements. He reviewed the proposed setbacks and tree removal. He reviewed the landscaping plan proposed, which would restore some of the trees removed. He noted that ornamental plants and shrubs would not count as replacement trees. He stated that there are screening requirements and therefore they may want to see that for the mechanical equipment and parking area. He noted that the landscaping plan would need to be modified in order to meet the tree replacement, if that is the desire. He reviewed the proposed signage, noting that you are not able to have a freestanding sign on an otherwise empty lot. He noted that the specifications for the lights proposed to be used for the signs would need to be known as well. He stated that there are not different demand times for medical office and assisted living and therefore there should be sufficient parking for each use and not a shared parking. Reid stated that she believes the peak time for assisted living would be holidays and weekends and during the daytime the number of residents and staff would remain static. Sparks provided additional details on the engineering standard, and noted that because the residents are retired, they are often home during the day and a higher number of staff is on hand as well. He noted that there is not an ironclad number for the number of units designated for independent/assisted/specialty units. He stated that the parking proposed would likely be a workable number. Reid asked if the office complex and senior living building would have separate owners. Sparks believed that the developer would own both and have people run each business, but noted that the applicant could provide that clarification. He provided details concerning the wetland area on the site and the buffer that would be required. He noted that the Watershed District and City Engineer have requested additional clarifications and modifications. He stated that because the site is being built up, that would create additional slope and therefore the Watershed District would require additional buffer. He noted that an average buffer method could work in this situation, but that methodology would need to be provided. He stated that the Watershed District has requested revisions to the plan which may cause changes to the site. He noted that the City Engineer is also requesting additional information for the 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from July 11, 2017 Meeting Minutes WCA requirements and permitting. He stated that they would like the parking and access drive to be controlled by the association. He stated that there are three different requests that must be considered in a specific order. He noted that the rezoning would be the first item to consider, with the Preliminary Plat to follow and then lastly the Site Plan review with details provided for the Commission to consider for each step of the request. DesLauriers asked what can be done to ensure there is an association. Sparks stated that the City Attorney reviewed the draft association documents and made suggestions for changes that would make the association strong. Reid asked and received confirmation that the items recommended to be changed are included in the proposed conditions. Albers asked concerning the minimum number of surface parking stalls needed. White stated that it would seem the City would have to know the ratio of mixed uses in order to determine the appropriate parking requirements. Reid noted that could be difficult as residents could begin as independent and transition to assisted living within the same unit. Albers stated that he has a lot of confusion with the parking. He asked if the City should review their zoning requirements to determine a better standard. Sparks noted that Medina does not have this specific use within their zoning ordinance which can make it tricky. He explained that staff worked with the applicant using the parking required for independent living apartments and then using the engineering study for ratios as well. He explained that the parking requirement is designed to handle peak times. Albers asked how many units were counted with the 2.2 requirement. Sparks replied that one half of the senior living building was calculated as that ratio, explaining that the office building was calculated with its own ratio. Albers asked if the staff parking is included in the parking requirements. He stated that he did not foresee more than one car per unit for the senior living facility and therefore it seems like too many stalls. Sparks explained that the calculation is not based on the residents having those vehicles, but also includes staff and visitors. Albers asked if there is a concern with the impervious surface. Finke provided additional information on parking and proof of parking that could be provided in lieu of providing the actual additional parking. He explained that the proof of parking would need to be identified on the site and if additional parking is required, that area could then be built out. He stated that it is in the best interest of the owner to ensure necessary parking is being provided for the residents and guests. He noted that the larger assisted living units may require more parking than the .4 slated as well, which may create a balance between the independent and assisted living parking. 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from July 11, 2017 Meeting Minutes Dean Lunski, Lunski Inc., stated that they did incorporate the comments from the Commission and Council during the Concept Plan to reduce the number of units from 135 to 90. He noted that a 5,000- square foot building was removed and the medical office building was scaled down to better fit into the site. Craig Hartman, Momentum Design Group and project architect, stated that they have looked extensively into the parking for this site and with the different ratios, as the ordinance does not address this type of use. He stated that the ownership has put a lot of time into the issue of parking because he is most affected if the parking is not adequate. He stated that the independent living units will be half of the senior living facility. He stated that the goal is for residents to age in place and therefore the assisted living ratio will increase as time moves on and the independent living residents age into assisted living. He reviewed the calculations that they used to determine the parking number they believe to be sufficient, which is 111. He stated that there will be documents through the association which allow the parking to be shared between lots, but explained that the shared parking does not include a reduction in parking. He explained that the shared parking would allow visitors to park in the medical office parking area on high peak times, such as Christmas. Jay Hill, Hill Engineering and civil engineer for the project, stated that there are some wetland impacts associated with the project. He stated that this project would be the lowest impact to the wetlands of the designs that they originally reviewed. He noted that a majority of the wetland impacts would be for the access road on the west side. He stated that the City and Watershed District have a variety of rules and regulations, noting that the two sets of regulations do not always agree and therefore they are trying their best to meet the requirements of both the City and Watershed District. He stated that they are proposing to use wetland buffer averaging for their methodology. Lunski stated that they do not believe that any of the comments would substantially impact the project as designed and therefore they would ask the Commission to approve the project with the recommended conditions. Reid referenced the skyway connection, noting that the skyway appears to be white from the south view. She stated that her concern is the visual integration between the two different styles of buildings and would like to see the skyway less conspicuous. Hartman agreed that the skyway materials would be in line with the rest of the development and would be an approved material. He noted that the same masonry material from the senior building would be used on the medical office building and the stucco colors would be similar as well in order to integrate the two concepts together. Murrin referenced the medical office building and the 100 parking stalls allocated. She noted that a lot of the customers for the medical office building would be coming from the senior living building and asked if that was considered in the parking calculations. Hartman stated that the parking for the office building was designed per ordinance and did not take that factor into account as the ordinance does not allow that. He stated that this would be unique in that the two uses would connect through the skyway. He stated that there will be crossover between the uses, but the medical office building would also see other clients as well. He stated that it would be hard to gauge the percentage of crossover because of insurance and preferences. Lunski stated that the crossover design will be trending more now as that provides comfort to the residents in the senior living portion to have medical clinics close by. He provided additional details on how residents would be allowed to age in place in their unit as they move away from independent living and towards assisted living. 3 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from July 11, 2017 Meeting Minutes Reid asked if there would be communal dining. Hai lman noted that the residents would have the choice of a full kitchen in their unit and then would also have the ability to order in meals. White opened the public hearing at 8:38 p.m. No comments. White closed the public hearing at 8:39 p.m. Albers asked if the Commission felt comfortable pushing this forward to the Council with the number of changes recommended or whether the applicant should address the changes and come back to the Commission. Murrin stated that she is comfortable with the item moving forward with the conditions, as the applicant could address those items prior to City Council. She stated that she does like the option for proof of parking. Reid stated that the revisions should be made prior to going to City Council, as that will be a thorough review. DesLauriers stated that he was guessing and there was not a lot of time for the engineering study as that came back July 6th and there were 43 comments. He stated that there are another 20+ comments from the Watershed District. He stated that there is a lot of work to do and perhaps the applicant cannot do that prior to the Council. White stated that she would like to table the request to see the changes come back before the Commission. She stated that she thinks it is a great plan and she would like to be able to comment on the items once the revisions are made, providing an example of the tree preservation ordinance and wetland setbacks. She stated that there is a lot to preserve in Medina and those are important issues that she would like to see prior to passing the item to the Council. Reid agreed that if the changes were made, that would allow the project to move quickly to the City Council following the next review of the Planning Commission. Murrin stated that if the applicant could make all the changes prior to the next Council meeting, she would be in favor of passing this item forward. Finke stated that these changes would need to be made prior to the Council review. Albers stated that he would be in favor of tabling the request to allow the applicant to make the changes as recommended prior to the approval of the Planning Commission. Finke stated that a lot of the discussion is related to the Site Plan review. He noted that there are three actions requested and the Commission could discuss the rezoning request tonight. He noted that the current zoning is commercial and under the draft Comprehensive Plan the zoning would be business. He stated that there is a reasonable overlap in the two zonings and therefore it could be considered that business is not a huge jump from commercial. He noted that in the past few months when the Council has 4 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from July 11, 2017 Meeting Minutes considered rezoning ahead of the draft Comprehensive Plan those requests were drastically different zoning requests. Reid stated that she is okay with this request as the senior living would not be clearly visible from Highway 55. DesLauriers agreed in support of the rezoning. Amic also agreed with the rezoning as this will create an opportunity for residents of Medina to age in place in the community Murrin and Nester also confirmed their consensus with the rezoning request. Motion by Reid, seconded by Albers, to recommend approval of the rezoning. Motion carries unanimously. Finke noted that a change in notification would take place on August lst and therefore the Commission taking action on the rezoning will help the application move forward even if the Commission decides to table the remaining two requests. He stated that staff would tend to link the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan together. Murrin stated that if the Commission is going to table the remaining two actions, she would suggest waiting to discuss in further detail until the additional details are provided by the applicant at the next meeting. Reid stated that she likes that the applicant included the comments about the density of the site in their review between the Concept Plan, and then adjusted their plans accordingly. Motion by Albers, seconded by Reid, to table the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan review and recommend that the applicant update plans to be consistent with the staff comments. Further discussion: Amic noted that he would be in favor of allowing the item to move forward with the conditions and therefore will be voting against the motion. Motion carries 6-1. (Opposed: Amic) 5 Medina Park Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 7/19/2017 Meeting Minutes Lunski Inc. — Medina Senior Community — Park Dedication Review Gallup provided a brief staff report. She stated that the applicant is proposing a rezoning, preliminary plat, and a site plan review to construct a 90-unit assisted/independent living facility and 25,000 square foot medical/office building. Gallup stated that the subject site is located north of Highway 55, west of Mohawk Drive, and south of Chippewa Road, which is near one of the Park Commission's active park study areas. The Park Commission reviewed a map of the surrounding parcels in the active park study area to discuss other possible sites for a future active park. It was noted that there would be more land opportunity to be able to take a larger area for a park in one of the future low density residential sites just north of Chippewa Road. Gallup showed a picture of the Medina Senior Community site plan and described the extensive private trails that are being proposed on the site. Gallup noted that the Park Commission reviewed a concept plan of this project back in February and generally thought a trail easement should be acquired along Chippewa Road, the private internal trails should connect to the city trail system, and to take the remaining park dedication in cash. The Park Commission questioned their initial thoughts from February, agreeing that a trail on the north side of Chippewa Road would be a better option to serve the future low density developments and connect them to the future planned park. Gallup explained the park dedication ordinance in terms of this application, noting that the city could require up to 10% of the buildable land, which would equate to about 0.81 acres, 8% of the pre -developed value with a minimum of $3,500 per residential unit, which would be approximately $262,500, or a combination. Gallup stated that staff agrees with the Park Commission that a trail may be better located along the north side of Chippewa Road, but the Park Commission could still recommend securing the trail easement along the south side of Chippewa Road for future flexibility. She stated that staff would also recommend giving some due consideration for the private trails within the proposed development. She stated that if the city took a 13,710 square foot trail easement along Chippewa and reduced the fee by $50,000 for due consideration of private trails, it would leave approximately $111,437.50 remaining in cash for park dedication. The Park Commission discussed the possibility of a future trail along the south side of Chippewa Road, but they did not anticipate it happening. There was a general consensus of the Park Commission that the future trail along Chippewa Road should be on the north side. 1 Medina Park Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 7/19/2017 Meeting Minutes A motion was made by Meehan to recommend that the future trail along Chippewa Road be secured on the north side of the road as development occurs and to take cash -in -lieu of park dedication for the Lunski Inc. project and to allow staff to work with the developer to give some due consideration for their proposed private trail system. Motion seconded by Jacob and passed unanimously. 2 Medina City Council Excerpt from February 21, 2017 Meeting Minutes Lunski Senior Housing/Office Concept Plan Review — PID 03-118-23-32-0007 (7:18 p.m.) Finke noted that this is a concept plan review and therefore the Council will simply provide comments and no formal action is necessary. He stated that this is a proposed 80-unit combination of independent and assisted senior living and would also include an office building and commercial building. He discussed the topography and current state of the site including trees and wetlands. He stated that a future request may come forward to rezone the parcel from commercial to business. He noted that the draft Comprehensive Plan designates this land as business rather than the current designation of business. He identified the zoning and uses of adjacent properties. He displayed the concept plan which identifies the senior housing building, the office building, and the commercial building. He stated that the concept plan designates three lots and provided more details on the proposed access. He reviewed some of the concerns noted by staff including the need to specify the mix of assisted living and independent units within the complex. He noted that within the business zoning district, assisted living would need to be the primary use with independent living as an accessory. He stated that one item to be considered is whether the Council would be comfortable rezoning the parcel to business ahead of the adoption of the draft Comprehensive Plan. He noted that staff has suggested that the building size be reduced slightly to better fit onto the parcel. He provided additional information on high density housing and how those units are calculated. Pederson referenced the wetland that would be filled and asked for additional information. Finke stated that there are wetland impacts for the driveway, which staff views as a necessity as access will not be supported onto Highway 55. Anderson referenced lot three, specifically the setback requirement, and asked how much the applicant is short of meeting that requirement. Finke replied that the applicant would be about two or three feet short of meeting the setback requirement. Pederson asked whether emergency and fire vehicles would have adequate space to navigate the site. He noted that if this moves forward the Chippewa extension may be needed and the applicant should be aware of the costs. Mitchell noted that this is different than the original plan for the area but it could still be a good fit and asked for the input of the Council. Pederson stated that this seems to be a good fit for the property but it seems that there is too much going on with the site. Cousineau stated that this does not seem like a bad location for the project but the project is too large and feels like a jump ahead. Mitchell stated that commercial is not filtered through the same jump ahead as residential development. Anderson stated that the real question is regarding the policy. He stated that despite the similarities between business and commercial zoning, there have been previous applicants that wanted to come in under the new Comprehensive Plan zoning and the Council has denied those requests. He stated that if the applicant feels strongly they should request a Comprehensive Plan amendment. 1 Medina City Council Excerpt from February 21, 2017 Meeting Minutes Mitchell noted that this would not draw a large amount of traffic to the site, which is in agreement with what the City wants. He stated that he attended the Planning Commission meeting and endorsed the comment that the applicant work with the adjacent property owner for a possible driveway that would avoid the wetland. He stated that the applicant has stated that they would like flexibility in the unit type so that they can change over time based on the market demands. He cautioned to ensure that if flexibility is provided, a sufficient amount of parking is still provided. He stated that this seems to be a lot of development on not so much land. Cousineau stated that there is real emphasis on the business park zoning that the buildings should blend into the surroundings and she commented that perhaps the landscaping could be tweaked to better blend. She noted that the height of the building would stand out a lot compared to the surrounding uses. Pederson stated that applicants have complained later in the process about the cost of underground parking and noted that the applicant should be aware of that cost as the underground parking would be needed to support this level of development. Anderson noted the applicant should be aware of the potential cost of expanding Chippewa that would come along with that road project. Mitchell stated that this is a terrific use for the property. He stated that the Council is getting into the design details in order to provide a higher level of comment to the applicant. He stated that he is in favor of the project with the comments the Council made tonight. Pederson stated that he is also in agreement with the project as long as the details could be worked out. Cousineau stated that she would be willing to rezone to high density if we could ensure our density is not in excess of our required numbers. Finke provided additional details on the process that would be necessary to change the zoning to high density. He stated that at the Planning Commission, the applicant did say that if the rezoning was done to high density they would not be opposed to that and would then choose high density rather than senior living. Cousineau asked if this could create a creep in the increase of residential units that would not count towards high density requirements. Finke stated that there are a number of acres available for business development that could be used for assisted type living. Dean Lunski, applicant, stated that they purchased the property in 2005 with the intent to develop in 2005, but a moratorium was placed and therefore they have not been able to develop. He stated that if they were going to rezone to residential they would go to multi -family housing rather than independent/assisted living as that use is also highly in demand. He stated that the aging population of Medina is growing and therefore there is a demand for senior living in the area. Mitchell stated that the applicant has sat on this land for many years and the applicant would like to get moving and not wait until 2020. 2 YY SB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 I Minneapolis, MN 55416 I (763) 541-480011 August 9, 2017 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Medina Senior Living — Engineering Review City Project No. LR-17-204 WSB Project No. 03433-140 Dear Mr. Finke: We have reviewed The Medina Senior Living application and plans dated August 4, 2017. The applicant proposes to construct a 90-unit senior living complex consisting of three stories and approximately 118,100 square feet. In addition, a separate 40,000 square foot two-story medical/office building is also proposed for the site. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Site and Grading Plans 1. The utilities shown on the site plan and make it difficult to read, either eliminate these on the site plan or make the line -types lighter. Complete. 2. The City's comprehensive trail plan shows a future trail extension along Chippewa Road. The applicant may need to provide additional right of way, easements, and/or construct a trail along this section of Chippewa Road as a part of the park dedication allocation to the City. 3. Provide an exhibit showing the turning movements of trucks (fire and delivery) within the site including the delivery entrances along with a detail of the truck dimensions. 4. Correct the symbol for the proposed tree locations on the landscaping sheets; it is also not clear what types of trees are being planted in relation to the legend. Complete. 5. The City will provide confirmation whether or not additional ROW is required along Chippewa Road for the trail once the traffic study has been updated as indicated in this review concerning the turn lanes. 6. In general, plans shall meet the requirements set forth in the City's Design Manual. The applicant stated they will take this under advisement. 7. Maximize the parking lot bump out at the southeasterly lot to allow for greater turning movement space during backup maneuvering. Complete. Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer l wsbeng.como Medina Senior Living — Engineering Review August 9, 2017 Page 2 8. Provide analysis to confirm that the proposed underground parking is feasible given the underlying soil conditions and water table elevation. 9. Correct hatching for pavement sections. It appears the porous asphalt is mis-labelled. Use a different hatch for the bituminous trail to differentiate from the bituminous road pavement. Add an item in the legend for standard duty pavement (un-hatched portion shown). 10. The proposed bump -out for fire truck turning encroaches into the pond. Update the pond contours and stormwater modelling to address change in pond sizing. 11. With final construction plans please provide the following: o Details and design information for the proposed boardwalk. o There are details shown in the plans for retaining wall, show the location and elevation information more clearly on the site/grading plans. The elevations should include both the top and bottom of the wall. o Note that slopes shall not exceed 3:1 in locations where the steep slopes are proposed. Utility Plan 12. Easements may be required by the City to encompass all or a portion of the sanitary sewer and watermain into the site. 13. Looping connections may be required to minimize long dead-end watermain sections, the layout provided will require review by the City's Fire Marshall. Extend the watermain south with the sanitary sewer alignment along w1vlerty line and provide a second connection to the existing watermain at TH 55 Complete. 14. Extend the wate- sar Chippewa Road. The sewer and watermain were extended, but add a gate valve to the watermain stub. 15. Label the building service tely and for the sanitary services. Add missing invert information to sewer stub proposed for the future lot. 16. With final construction plans please provide the following: o Provide dimension labels between watermain and both sanitary sewer and storm sewer piping. o Use different line -type for sanitary sewer that includes arrows to denote direction of flow. o On Sheet C5.0 under Sanitary Sewer Notes, note 1 needs to be corrected to meet the requirements of the City of Medina design guidelines in regards to pipe strength designation and bury depth. Need to add that PVC DR 18 is required for pipe depths greater than 26'. o Turn off pavement striping and hatching on utility plan. It is difficult to differentiate piping with striping in some cases. o Hydrants should be located 5' behind the back of curb. It appears that some are not meeting this requirement. o Add valve symbols to locations where valves are noted on the plan in all instances. Medina Senior Living — Engineering Review August 9, 2017 Page 3 17. Based on the current design, it appears the applicant will be required to apply for permits from DLI and MDH, provide copies to the City. Traffic & Intersections The City requested that the applicant's traffic engineer work directly with WSB's traffic engineer to resolve the comments below. By the date of this memo, a time had not been finalized to discuss and resolve the comments. 18. Although the Traffic Study does indicate that no turn lanes are required at the Site Entrance, the updated information and analysis outlined below should be provided to make a final determination. In addition, in order to provide a recommendation on the need for turn lanes at Willow Drive or determining the interaction between the adjacent driveways, the additional information and analysis should be provided. The applicant provided a review of the warrants requiring turn lanes, but even though the speed is less than 45 MPH, an analysis showing the volumes do not meet the criteria should be provided in the report. 19. Dependent on the increase on vehicular traffic, the development may contribute to the need for cxtendin2 Chippewa Road to the east b< give. Applicant stated that this site does not drive the need for the new roadway extension. 20. The posted speed limit on Chippewa Road is currently 40 mph. There are horizontal curves on the current roadway west of the proposed site driveway. With this in mind, the proposed driveway should be analyzed for sight distance issues or concerns. re oving the site The applicant provided a figure, but field test data should also be provided and included with the final report. 21. The intersection analysis only considered Chippewa Road at the site entrance. To document the area impacts, the intersections of Chippewa Road at Willow Drive and Chippewa Road at Mohawk Drive should also be analyzed. The applicant stated that the increase in traffic volumes would not have an impact on nearby intersections, but an analysis was not included with the traffic study. Include the analysis with the traffic study. 22. The site traffic generation should be revised/updated with the following: o The text of the project narrative indicates that the Senior Housing part of the site includes assisted living as well as the senior housing. o The medical office is now smaller 24,757 sf o The retail is now larger 4,320 sf. Is it anticipated that this could be a Pharmacy? If so, that should be used for traffic generation. 23. The majority of the traffic to and from the site will use Willow Drive to TH 55. Additional analysis showing delay's and queues need to provided, specifically for the left and right turn movements at: o Chippewa Road at site driveway; o Chippewa Road at Willow Road; o Chippewa Road at Mohawk Drive. 24. The site plan should be updated to show the correct location of the proposed uses. The future phase (commercial) access location to the main driveway is close to Chippewa Road. ;. The applicant stated that the future use of the this Medina Senior Living — Engineering Review August 9, 2017 Page 4 site is unknown. An assumption should be provided based on the proposed allowable land use to document the most conservative condition for the site. 25. The Traffic Study indicates that the interaction between the Site entrance and the property driveway adjacent to it does not have any issues. Provide the assumption(s) for development of the adjacent property and additional discussion/analysis, including future traffic generation and the anticipated left/right turn queues between driveways, to validate whether or not there will be future impacts and issues. The applicant provided approximate trip generation information, but will need to include with the report. Stormwater Management 26. The development will need to meet the City's infiltration requirement. It is not clear in the submittal how this will be accomplished. One option is to utilize stormwater reuse from the proposed ponds for irrigation. The ponds are not allowed to be drained completely because of "aesthetic purposes". A minimum of 2 feet of water must be kept in the ponds at all times. Volume credit for reuse should be calculated using the RWMWD Stormwater Reuse Calculator. This method has been accepted by the City for previous developments. Please resubmit these calculations showing that the volume abstraction requirement has been met. 27. Several ponds are shown on the grading plans. The City requires compliance with the volume control requirement and it is not clear that any infiltration or filtration volume is provided. See previous comment above. 28. The development will need to meet the appropriate Elm Creek Watershed standards and permitting requirements, provide permitting documents to the City when approved. 29. Provide demonstration that the water quality criteria have been met using PondNet, P8, or other approved water quality modeling method. Once the volume abstraction requirement has been met, then the water quality requirement has been met. Please address. 30. Specify if future impervious area at the north side of the site has been included for treatment or if this area is to be treated once constructed. Complete. Future impervious is not included. 31. EOFs must be labeled on the plans for all BMPs. Complete 32. Label the size and type of existing and proposed storm sewer piping, label the invert information on all catch basins/manholes. Complete 33. Calculations must be submitted indicating the culvert under the proposed entrance road is sized adequately to convey the offsite tributary area to the wetland. Complete 34. North Pond must have a minimum dead pool depth of 3 feet. Complete 35. North Pond NWL does not match that used in HydroCAD. Confirm the correct NWL and HWL. Currently, the NWL in HydroCAD for the North Pond is set at 991, but the plans show 992, please correct. 36. Show HWL on the plans for the biofiltration basin. Complete 37. Confirm that the freeboard from the lowest opening of the buildings meets the two feet of freeboard from the emergency overflow elevations of the BMPs. The two foot free -board requirement has not been met; either the freeboard requirement is met or the applicant must demonstrate that the 100-year back to back storm does not affect the adjacent buildings. Medina Senior Living — Engineering Review August 9, 2017 Page 5 Wetland Impacts The wetland impact comments have been addressed. Temporary Stockpile Plan 38. All silt fence should be heavy duty. Two -rows of silt fence will be required adjacent to the wetland areas. 39. Provide written permission from property owner concerning right of entry. 40. Based on the proposed "10' maximum height" and the City's understanding that 32,000 cubic yards are intended to be stockpiled and considering sloped sides, a larger footprint or higher stockpile height may be necessary. 41. Add a note that the existing driveway is a right -in, right -out condition. 42. An NPDES permit will be required for an area of disturbance or size of stockpile over one acre. 43. Add a note to the plans to "protect existing culvert" as it appears the entrance to the stockpile site will be directly over this pipe. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer elm creek Watershed Management Commission ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 3235 Fernbrook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 PH: 763.553.1144 E-mail: judie@jass.b¢ www.e Im creekwate rs he d.o rg TECHNICAL OFFICE Hennepin County Public Works Departmentof Environment and Energy 701 Fourth Ave. South, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN55415 PH: 612.596.1171 E-mail: jason.swenson(&bennepin.us Medina Senior Living Facility Medina, Project #2017-019 Proiect Overview: The 10.8-acre commercial project site is located north of Highway 55, south of Chippewa Drive and midway between Willow Drive and Mohawk Drive. The site is currently vacant and covered by forested lands and a cattail marsh wetland is located in the central portion of the site running in an east -west direction. The proposed project is 6.00 acres, with 3.77 acres of impervious surface and will include two new main building structures, an accessory structure, and paved parking and driveway access to Chippewa Road. The remaining approximately 3.5 acres on the north side of the site will be platted for future development and is not subject to the Elm Creek Watershed Commission review now. Our review will be for compliance to the Commission's 3rd generation standards and rules. Applicant: Lunski Inc. — c/o Dean Lunski, 1416 Main Street, Hopkins, MN 55343. Phone: 952- 929-3400. Email: dlunski@psidb.com Agent/Engineer: Hill Engineering, Inc. — c/o Jay Hill, P.E., 1585 Dunlap Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55108. Phone: 612-987-4455. Email: hilleng@gmaiLcom Exhibits: 1) ECWMC Request for Plan Review and Approval received May 31, 2017 (City authoriza t io n is June 1, 2017). 2) Project review fee of $2,750 on May 31, 2017. 3) Complete plan was received on June 20, 2017. 4) Medina Senior Living Community Preliminary Plat (dated 5/12/2017) 5) Medina Senior Living Community, Site Plan Review Submittal (dated June 19, 2017) CS Cover Sheet A -SITE Architectural Site Plan C1.0 Existing Conditions C2.0 Tree Survey C3.0 Site Plan C4.0 Grading Plan C5.0 Utility Plan C6.0-6.2 Civil Details C7.0 SWPPP CHAMPLIN • CORCORAN • DAYTON • MAPLE GROVE • MEDINA • PLYMOUTH • ROGERS S:\EMD\DEMCON\CORR\SWENSON\WATERSHEDS\ELM CREEK\PLAN REVIEWS\2017\2017-019 Medina Senior Community, Medina\2017-019 Review Memo.doo< Medina Senior Living Community Medina, Project 2017-019 July 5, 2017 C7.1 Erosion Control Plan L1.0-2.0Landscaping Plan 6) Stormwater Design Report, dated June 16, 2017 (unsigned). 7) Joint Application Form for Wetland Impacts, Dated 6/19/2017 8) Purchase Agreement for Wetland Bank Credits, 6/16/2017 Page 2 Findings; 9) A complete application was received on June 20, 2017. The initial 60-day review period expires August 19, 2017. 10) The entire site will be routed to the existing wetland located in the center of the property. The wetland discharges through a 15" Culvert to the south into the Highway 55 Right of Way, then south under Highway 55 and through neighboring properties before discharging into the series of wetlands and ditches south of Highway 55 eventually flowing north into Rush Creek. 11) Rule F. Floodplain Alteration does not pertain to this project. There are no established FEMA or ECWMC flood plains within the project corridor. 12)Rule G. Wetland Alteration. City of Medina is the Local Government Unit administering the Wetland Conservation Act of Minnesota. A wetland delineation has been completed and approved by the LGU. The applicant proposes impacts to 0.11 acres of wetlands to complete the project. The applicant is proposing to purchase banking credits to mitigate the proposed impacts. Credits are proposed to be purchased from the Soberg wetland bank in Hennepin County, roughly 1 % miles west of the proposed impacts. In addition, there is a trail crossing of the wetland with no details of what this crossing is (grading, boardwalk, etc...). Information about this crossing must be added to the project plans and should be included in any WCA permit applications. These issues should be addressed by the City of Medina in their role as WCA LGU. 13) Rule I. Buffer requirements. Bi iers are required to be an average of 25 feet wide, with a minimum width of 10 feet. Several revisions are required to meet the Commission's requirements as follows: a. At the proposed wetland impact area, a 10 foot wide minimum buffer is required. Based on the site improvements as shown, this will require moving several proposed trails out of the minimum buffer as they are not allowed in the buffer when constructed as part of other site improvements. b. The proposed gazebo will also need to be moved out of the 10 foot required minimum buffer, and we suggest it also meet the recommended structure setback of 15 feet from the required buffer. c. There are multiple locations where the proposed buildings encroach into the reconunended 15 foot structure setback from the wetland buffer. Medina Senior Living Community Medina, Project 2017-019 July 5, 2017 Page 3 d. The applicant must provide calculations demonstrating that minimum area is met for the wetland buffers, taking into account all areas that require additional width being added for slopes that are steeper than 6H:1V. There are multiple areas where the minimum slopes are not met. e. The applicant is proposing including all of the south pond and sloped as part of the wetland buffer to increase the average buffer width. Staff will accept the pond in the minimum 25 foot buffer in this area, but will not allow the remainder of the pond to be include in the buffer width averaging. 14) Rule E. Erosion and Sediment Control will meet the Commission's requirements with minor revisions: a) A final plan, dated and signed by a Professional Engineer licensed in Minnesota, must be submitted to the Commission and the City of Medina. b) The SWPPP must include a map identifying the receiving waters from the site. The SWPPP states that the site drains to waters that are impaired. These must be identified correctly in the SWPPP, not just stated generically. A review of the MPCA impaired waters map did not identify any impaired waters within 1 mile of the site. c) Note #6 on Sheet C4.0 need to be changed to state stabilization must occur within 14 days per the current NPDES permit. The language on the plans has not been effective since August of 2013 when the current NPDES permit was made effective. d) The SWPPP should identify who prepared the SWPPP and the training received that qualifies them to prepare the SWPPP to comply with NPDES permit requirements. A copy of the University of Minnesota Erosion Control Certification is one example. e) BMP Notes on Sheet 7.0, Item 1 refers to designing all BMPS for 0.5 inches of runoff. This should be replaced with 1.1 inches, per the current Elm Creek Watershed Standards (which will also meet the current requirements of the NPDES construction stormwater permit in effect since August of 2013. f) The plans should have an actual Statement of Estimated Quantities (SEQ) on the plans for at a minimum of all erosion control items to comply with NPDES permit requirements. The erosion control plans must provide redundant sediment control devices (such as a second line of silt fence) adjacent to the wetland on site since the required 50 foot buffer in the NPDES permit will not be maintained. h) Inlet erosion controls should be shown at all culverts on the site per the detail plate ERO-9 on Sheet C7.0 i) Details are missing for the proposed filtration basin such as the depth of the facility above the filtration medium (see the cross section on Sheet C6.2). In addition, these details appear to conflict with some of the standard plate details on RG-02 and RG-03 on sheet C6.0. Details RG-02 and RG-03 are also largely illegible at the scale they are currently printed at and should be increased in size. The Civil details on sheet 6.0 include a porous asphalt detaiUcross section that refers to a draft specification from MnDOT dating to 2012. The applicant should note that this specification is now outdated and should be updated to MnDOT's current standard. The 0 j) Medina Senior Living Community Medina, Project 2017-019 July 5, 2017 Page 4 last revision from MnDOT is dated 4/3/2017 and may be found in MnDOT Special Provisions SP 140. k) No soil borings were provided for review showing the groundwater elevations on the site. If any of the proposed pervious parking facilities or ram garden do not meet the required 3 feet of separation from the groundwater elevation, then an impermeable liner is required. This appears to primarily be an issue for the proposed ram garden facility. 1) The bottom of all infiltration/infiltration features should be scarified (ripped) to a minimum depth of 12 inches prior to installing the remainder of the infiltration feature. 15) Rule D. Stormwater Management will be provided by two proposed ponds and filtration feature (ram garden). Per the stormwater reports, runoff from the rooftops is proposed to be routed directly to the south stormwater pond. However, no details on how this is proposed to occur are provided for review, and the roof profile of the senior living community does not support this conclusion as shown on the plans. Runoff from the parking areas is a routed through pervious parking areas and then also is directed to the south stormwater pond. Runoff from the entrance access and some trails is proposed to be directed to the northern stormwater pond. A rain water garden is also proposed for the site that will provide treatment for runoff from some of the proposed trails only. Again, it should be noted that the stormwater calculations do not appear to take into account any further expansion on the north side of the site at this time outside of the proposed access drive. 16) The southern pond outlet will be equipped with a 12" orifice at 990.0' and discharges through a 10" outlet pipe at 991.0' in elevation. No details on proposed pipes or outlet control structures were provided for review in the plan set. 17) The northern pond will be equipped with a 12" orifice at 990.0' and discharges through a 12" outlet pipe at 991.0' in elevation per the HydroCAD model. The project plans call for a normal water level of 992.0'. This discrepancy must be resolved. No details on proposed pipes or outlet control structures were provided for review in the plan set. 18) The HydroCAD modeling for the site does not take into account the existing watersurface or the proposed water surface correctly in the modeling. All open water surfaces, such as open water in the wetland and open water on each of the proposed ponds should be modeled using a curve number of 98 (though this is not included in the impervious surfaces calculation). 19) Storwater rate control. The post -development stormwater runoff rates for the 2-, 10- and 100-year events meet the standards as presently modeled and are shown below: Storm Event Existing Discharge Rate (cfs) Proposed Discharge Rate (cfs) 2-year 2.60 0.87 10-year 5.04 1.66 100-year 10.81 3.58 Medina Senior Living Community Medina, Project 2017-019 July 5, 2017 Page 5 These rates will require verification when modifications are made to the HydroCAD models. 20) Volume analysis: The volume abstraction requirement for 1.1" of runoff from 3.37 acres of new impervious surface is about 13,460 cubic feet. The applicant notes that soils are not conducive for infiltration. However, a significant portion of the site appears to contain type C soils that have a higher infiltration rate than used in the modeling for the project. The applicant is proposing to build three separate areas of parking with pervious pavement and storage provided under the pavement with drain tile outlets. Two of these appear to be able to be redesigned to take advantage of the better soils to increase the volume abstraction. Without detailed infiltration testing of the soils at the actual elevations where infiltration is proposed to occur, the applicant is advised to use the infiltration rates from the Minnesota Stormwater Manual with a factor of safety of 2.0 applied to them (ie: reduce the infiltrat io n rate in %2). The applicant proposes using excess wetland buffer areas for additional abstraction credits. Per the notes above, the area covering the south pond is not acceptable for use in these calculations. The applicant will need to provide a better accounting of how the required abstraction will be met for the site. 21) Water quality and nutrient analysis : a. The applicant provided a narrative account of water quality and nutrient analysis from the site, but provided no backup calculations to demonstrate how these numbers were determined. b. The applicant also appears to call the existing forested area on the site grassland, meadow, or open space. The applicant is advised to apply the correct pre -developed land use of woodland to the water quality calculations. c. The applicant must provide the calculations from PondNET or other water quality modeling software (such as the MIDS calculator) to demonstrate the source of the information provided in the narrative. 22) At the time of writing this report, it was not certain which party (City of Medina or the applicant) would be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater management facilities. A responsible party must be established for the O&M Plan. Medina Senior Living Community Medina, Project 2017-019 July 5, 2017 Recommendation: Page 6 None at this time. Significant revisions are still required to the site to bring it into compliance with ECWMC Rules. Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy July 5, 2017 Jason Swenson, P.E. Technical Advisor to the Commission ��p��INS14�� * .<' Tr LUNSKI INC. ALJ �� ,vs - M-t4 " August 4, 2017 Dusty Finke City Planner, City of Medina Department of Planning and Zoning 2052 County Road 24 Medina, Minnesota 55340 Mr. Finke, Please find enclosed the summary for the proposed development located between Highway 55 and Chippewa Road (PID #0311823320007). The proposed project consists of two components: a 3 story Assisted / Independent Senior Living Community and a two story medical/office building. Project Description: We are proposing a 90 unit assisted / independent senior living community consisting of three stories and approximately 118,100 square feet. The design of the senior community will accommodate a minimum of 50% assisted living units and likely more depending upon leasing demand. Amenities will include on -site dining, a bistro cafe / coffee shop, beauty salon, exercise / wellness room, and various group gathering areas accommodating a wide variety of activities. Extensive outdoor spaces including porches, patios and trails across the site provide additional opportunities for residents to engage the natural setting. In addition to the residential building, a two story, 40,000 s.f. (approximate) medical / office building is proposed adjacent to Highway 55 along the southern portion of the site. The intended use will provide a synergistic relationship with the senior facility and augment the services available to residents on site in addition to providing a valuable medical resource within the area. A proposed skyway connection between the two buildings will further allow residents and staff to work in tandem across the two facilities. An underground parking garage as well as surface parking is provided for this facility. After receiving comments through the city's Concept Submittal review of the project, and per discussion with City staff, we have made a number of revisions to the overall project. These revisions are the result of both internal review as well as our best attempt to comply with the City of Medina's zoning ordinances. These revisions include: �% Overall reduction of units within the senior living facility from 135 to 90. �% Reduction in the medical / office building area by approximately 6,000 s.f. �% Eliminated 1 story commercial building within the southwest corner of the site resulting in a need for 17 fewer parking stalls. �% All buildings within the development conform to setback regulations per B zoning requirements. �% Lot lines are revised to reflect the footprint of the access drive within lot 1 as well as the parking layout between lots 3 and 4. �% Parking calculations are revised to better reflect the City's ordinances however the ordinances do not specifically address a service based senior living facility as a type of use. �% A walking path has been extended to Chippewa Road per staff comments. �% The current site plan complies with B zoning district landscape requirements including: 12' buffer between all buildings and access drives, 8% of parking and drive areas are landscaped, and landscaping breaks within the parking lot are minimum 12' wide. �% Fire truck turn -around has been included behind the Medical / office building. �% Wetland impact has been minimized in the vicinity of the private access drive. As a part of this process, the gazebo was eliminated and the walking trail has been revised. �% The wetland buffer has been revised to comply with average setbacks required by both the City of Medina as well as the Elm Creek Watershed. In addition, revisions were made to ensure building overhangs and balconies comply with the setback requirements. �% Signage has been relocated to comply with setback and clear vision triangles at intersections. The existing site: The 10.8 acre site is zoned Rural Commercial Holding (RCH). A large portion of the site consists of a Manage 1 Wetland. The wetland area including buffer and required building setbacks total slightly more than 40% of the overall site area. There have been a variety of concept plans prepared consisting of a variety of proposed uses for the site. All of the other concept plans required significantly more wetland impacts in order to develop a feasible concept plan. Since the existing wetland bisects the property and there are site access controls along Highway 55, it is impossible to avoid all wetland impacts while utilizing available developable land. This proposed design minimizes the amount of proposed wetland impact to the greatest amount possible. It is anticipated that wetland replacement will be achieved by purchasing available off -site wetland banking credits. There are almost 2,000 caliper -inches of significant trees located on the property. The proposed design preserves 70% of the existing significant trees. It is proposed that a portion of the replacement trees will be provided on -site, with the balance being provided as payment to the City.. The proposed buildings: The Senior Living Facility building is a 3 story, 90 unit assisted living / independent senior community with one level of parking partially below grade. The total gross area of this building, excluding garage, will be approximately 99,800 square feet. The garage will be approximately 18,500 square feet and will contain 48 parking stalls. The medical / office building will be two stories and contain approximately 24,800 square feet of commercial space. In addition, a lower level will accommodate 33 garage stalls as well as service space. The intended use would provide a regional clinic with the potential for specialty care such as chiropractic, orthopedic, or rehabilitation / physical therapy services. A skyway connection between buildings on site allows direct access for the residents of the senior facility to take direct advantage of these additional services available. 2 Proposed architectural details of the new buildings: The buildings will comply with the City of Medina's performance standards for exterior materials per Section 835 and 838.5 (by reference). The Senior Living Facility will be detailed in a traditional manner, including a masonry base and accents, and provide warm earth tone colors. The Senior Living Facility will employ sloped roofs at a minimum 6:12 pitch. The medical / office facility design has a more modern feel however will share masonry materials with the senior living facility as well as other material cues. A manufactured wood veneer and composite metal panel elements accent the masonry and stucco structure. Both buildings provide a regular patterned window system and a variety of materials to subdivide exterior facades to minimize scale and enhance the community feel. Parking: There has been significant discussion regarding the amount of parking required for the proposed uses on the site. Currently 216 total parking spaces are provided across lots 3 and 4. This has been reduced by 4 stalls since the last application to comply with comments provided by City staff. 81 stalls (38%) are underground garage parking, minimizing additional impervious site coverage. The medical / office building requires 100 parking stalls and currently meets city ordinances for its use at 1 parking stall per 250 s.f. of area. The Senior Living Facility is currently allotted 120 parking stalls. The City of Medina does not recognize a service based senior living facility within its parking ordinances and therefore does not have a use type which can be properly applied in this situation. Currently we are calculating parking for this facility in the following manner: 45 Independent Living Units x 2.25 spaces / unit (Apartment use per Ordinance) = 102 stalls 30 Assisted Living Units x .4 spaces per unit (per City Staff) = 12 stalls 15 Memory Care / Special Care Suites x .35 spaces per unit (per City Staff) = 6 stalls Total calculated parking = 120 stalls Internally, ownership as well as the design team have evaluated a number of scenarios to ensure adequate parking is provided as it is a key component to the success of this development. Because there is not a specific ordinance which applies to this use, an alternate method of calculating parking based upon past experience and evaluation of other similar facilities results in the following: 45 Independent Living Units x 1.25 spaces per unit = 57 stalls 30 Assisted Living Units and Specialty Care Suites x .4 (per City staff) = 12 stalls Employee parking per shift = 28 stalls 90 total units x .25 guest parking (per Ordinance) = 23 stalls 3 Total calculated parking (alternative method) = 120 stalls Based on the parking evaluations above, we feel the proposed uses are adequately parked and will function as intended. Additional parking factors include: ■ Covenants between lots within the development allowing shared parking across lot lines to allow for ebb and flow of parking based on unique demand for certain occasions such as guest parking on holidays. ■ Private shuttle transportation provided by the Senior Living Facility reduces the need for residents to maintain a private vehicle. ■ The senior facility will maintain a minimum 50% assisted living units per the City's requirement however as the building matures, this percentage is likely to increase as a primary goal of the facility will be to allow residents to age in place. This would result in an additional decrease in demand for private vehicles on site in the future. Proposed site work: The site work will consist of the initial development of Lots 1, 3 and 4 and will include extending utilities through the site and the development of the main access drive. Overall site development will be consistent with the submitted Site Plan Review package with Lot 2 remaining a future phase. Sanitary sewer is currently available at the southwest corner of the site near the proposed outbuilding. Sanitary sewer service will be extended to the 2 proposed buildings and also along the proposed access drive to provide service for potential future development on the northern portion of the site. Watermain is currently available within the northern portion of the Highway 55 right of way. Water service will be extended to the 2 proposed buildings and also along the proposed access drive to provide service for potential future development on the northern portion of the site. Stormwater management is proposed to be handled on -site meeting all required rate, volume & quality requirements. All stormwater is proposed to be discharged to the existing onsite wetland complex. The plan currently has 2 retention ponds shown. In addition to these 2 major facilities, a number of smaller infiltration/filtration basins (rainwater gardens) will be developed within the project site. Project Phasing: Overall, site development will consist of Lots 1, 3 and 4 including construction of all underground utilities, site improvements, and landscaping. The Senior Living Facility on Lot 3 will be the first building to be constructed. The intent is to begin construction of the medical office / building on Lot 4 within the allotted city approval timeframe. 4 We look forward to a thoughtful discussion about this site and the potential benefits of its development. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Dean Lunski Lunski Inc. 1416 Mainstreet Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 5 EC dS0 t, 30 60 Scale In Feet GROSS AREA: WETLAND AREA: NET AREA: OUTLOT A 21,340 SF 1,594 SF 19,746 SF LOT 1 149,795 SF 34,734 SF 115,061 SF � ! w � ' b �\ ' Lo i I� o � r \ Z Cr)\ \ 9 Li) \ LOT 2 136,275 SF 43,611 SF 92,664 SF LOT 3 163,182 SF 33,052 SF 130,130 SF The Lawrence Pribyl Trust Lt. 1.E9 2..E0.9CAOS i 464.64 7 ) cu 6, e' /// z // o ,---N / � N / i j / / ��� �2 v �i 0 y w W SZA° 3 � f 2� 2, / . / �� 20' 3„8E ,8b °bOS S 0 1Z p iz 9E °6%5/ ii f ^ �£0 s" ° S00°36'30E i /) DELINE4TED WETLA\N 1\ �Sl CJ�\ l`lYl BOUNDARY 0 I A S89°28'21 "E CO rn 15' WERANE BUFFER SETBACK 30' WETLAND BUFFER \ „,,,\ \ \ \ LOT 1 \\\ °OOS S07° 51' 3 N M;,6E ,TE m bE'8S COr": COm �M 3 1\ 69.68 PROPOSED DRA UTILITY EASEM w 1` 1 / / \ 1 OUTLOT A NO°27139"W 391.81 1'969 3.6E,LZ.09S 289.61 v PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER WI MONUMENT SIGNS 25 6 '90 89.9 r1„00 c. �S0 \ / V' • \ �r•t. -c-1� s o \ cn L co) O O BLOCK t LOT 2 PROPOSED DRAINAGE& - UTILITY EASEMENT i �� h i ALL OF OUTLOT A TO BE DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT /T 4/ Thomas L Nichols 366.83 PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT / u106.. PID 03-118-23-32-0007 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED THAT PART OF THE WEST 918.12 FEET OF THE NW % OF THE SW a LYING NORTHERLY OF HIGHWAY 55. EXCEPT THE WEST 75 FEET THEREOF EXCEPT ROAD SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 118 RANGE 23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN EXISTING ZONING IS RURAL COMMERCIAL HOLDING (RCH) PER CITY ZONING MAP DATED 01/23/14 Z 0 cc z 0 0 u_ 0 z HILL Medina, Minnesota PRELIMINARY PLAT S1.0 Medina Senior Living Community Medina, Minnesota SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL - AUGUST 4, 2017 DEVELOPER: Lunski, Inc. DEAN LUNSKI 1416 MAINSTREET HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 612-990-0323 CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT: Building Construction Management, Inc. JON GUMBRILL P.O. BOX 3609 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 612-672-9183 ARCHITECT: Momentum Design Group, LLC CRAIG HARTMAN KELCIE ROBINSON 765 N. HAMPDEN AVENUE SUITE 180 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 CIVIL ENGINEER: Craig@mdgerchitects.com 651-253-2981 kelcie@mdgamhitects.com 651-279-3294 Hill Engineering, Inc. JAY HILL, P.E., R.L.S. Hilleng@gmaiLoom 612-987-4455 1585 DUNLAP STREET NORTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55108 PROJECT SITE LOCATION: SHEET INDEX: CS ASITE A 0.0 COVER SHEET ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SITE LIGHTING - PHOTOMETRIC CIVIL C1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS July 20, 2017 C2.0 TREE SURVEY July 20, 2017 C3.0 SITE PLAN July 20, 2017 C4.0 GRADING PLAN July 20, 2017 C5.0 UTILITY PLAN July 20, 2017 C6.0 CIVIL DETAILS July 20, 2017 C6.1 CIVIL DETAILS July 20, 2017 C6.2 CIVIL DETAILS July 20, 2017 C7.0 SWPPP July 20, 2017 C7.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN July 20, 2017 LANDSCAPE L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN July 20, 2017 L2.0 LANDSCAPE DETAILS July 20, 2017 ARCHITECTURAL AO SENIOR FACILITY - GARAGE PLAN June 19, 2017 Al SENIOR FACILITY -1ST FLOOR PLAN June 19, 2017 A2 SENIOR FACILITY -2ND FLOOR PLAN June 19, 2017 A3 SENIOR FACILITY-3RD FLOOR PLAN June 19, 2017 A4 SENIOR FACILITY- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS July 20, 2017 A5 SENIOR FACILITY- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS June 19, 2017 A6 MEDICAL/OFFICE-FLOOR PLANS June 19, 2017 A7 MEDICAL/OFFICE- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS June 19, 2017 A8 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES June 19, 2017 A9 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES June 19, 2017 ABBREVIATIONS: ABV ACC AFF ARCH ALUM APPROX BPL BM BLKG BOT BOW CIP CB CLG CT CLR CONC CMU CONST CONT CRS -ABOVE CJ -ACCESSIBLE DTL -ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR DIA -ARCHITECT DIM -ALUMINUM DR -APPROXIMATE DS -BEARING PLATE DWG -BENCH MARK DF -BLOCKING ELECT -BOTTOM EL -BOTTOM OF WALL EO -CAST-IN-PLACE -CATCH BASIN -CEILING -CERAMIC TILE -CLEAR(ANCE) -CONCRETE -CONTROL JOINT -DETAIL -DIAMETER -DIMENSION -DOOR -DOWNSPOUT -DRAWING -DRINKING FOUNTAIN -ELECTRIC(AL) -ELEVATION EQUAL EXH -EXHAUST EXIST -EXISTING EJ -EXPANSION JOINT EXP -EXPANSION EF -EXHAUST FAN ELEC PNL -ELECTRICAL PANEL -CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT EWC -ELECTRIC WATER COOLER ID -INSIDE DIAMETER -CONSTRUCTION EXT EXTERIOR INSUL -INSULATION -CONTINUE IOUS) FFE -FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION INT -INTERIOR -COURSE FPL -FIREPLACE INV -INVERT FD -FLOOR DRAIN JST FTG -FOOTING LAM FND -FOUNDATION LAV FH -FIRE HYDRANT LN GA -GAGE, GAUGE LT GALV -GALVANIZED MAT GC -GENERAL CONTRACTOR MH GB -GRAB BAR MFR HOW -HARDWARE MAS HVAC-HEATING/VENTILATION/ MO AIR CONDITIONING MTL HT -HEIGHT MISC HC -HANDICAP NIG HM -HOLLOW METAL NTS HOR -HORIZONTAL NO HB -HOSE BIBB OC INCL -INCLUDE OPNG OPP OPH OD OH -JOIST OHD -OVERHEAD DOOR RM -ROOM UR -LAMINATE PAR -PARALLEL RO -ROUGH OPENING UNO -LAVATORY PART -PARTITION RBS -ROD AND SHELF VERT -LEFT HAND PVMT -PAVEMENT SHTG -SHEATHING VTR -LIGHT PLAM -PLASTIC LAMINATE SHR -SHOWER WD -MATERIAL PL -PLATE SIM -SIMILAR WC -MANHOLE PT -PRESSURE TREATED SC -SOLID CORE WH -MANUFACTURE PVC -POLYVINYL CHLORIDE SPEC -SPECIFICATIONS WP -MASONRY PSF -POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT SQ -SQUARE WR -MASONRY OPENING PSI -POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH SSTL -STAINLESS STEEL WWF -METAL PC -PRECAST SD -STORM DRAIN W -MISCELLANEOUS PL -PROPERTY LINE STRUCT -STRUCTURAL YH -NOT IN CONTRACT PP -POWER POLE SYM-SYMMETRY(ICAL) YD -NOT TO SCALE QT -QUARRY TILE THK THICKNESS YI -NUMBER RRAOIUS TOC -TOP OF CONCRETE -ON CENTER RA -RETURN AIRTOS -TOP OF SLAB -OPENING RD -ROOF DRAIN TOW -TOP OF WALL -OPPOSITE REF -REFERENCE T -TREAD OPPOSITE HAND RF -ROCK FACE TYP -TYPICAL -OUTSIDE DIAMETER RH -RIGHT HAND TOF -TOP OF FOOTING -OVERHEAD ROW -RIGHT OF WAY UNF -UNFINISHED -URINAL -UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE -VERTICAL -VENT THRU ROOF -WOOD -WATER CLOSET -WATER HEATER. -WATERPROOFING -WATER RESISTANT -WELDED WIRE FABRIC -WIDTH. WIDE -YARD HYDRANT -YARD DRAIN -YARD INLET GENERAL NOTES: ALL NECESSARY AND/OR REQUIRED TESTS, INSPECTIONS SHOP DRAWING REVIEWS AND DRAWING INTERPRETATIONS, REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL CONDITIONS, SHALL BE EXECUTED BY A REGISTERED ARCHITECT AND/OR BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER; IF NOT, THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD AND/ OR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS FOR THAT PORTION OF THE WORK IMPROPERLY EXECUTED. THE INSPECTION ARCHITECT AND/OR ENGINEER SHALL BECOME RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE INSPECTIONS, DECISIONS AND/OR DOCUMENT INTERPRETATIONS MADE AS THEY RELATE TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THEIR INTENT. -ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND MOST STRINGENT SHALL APPLY. - DIMENSIONS GIVEN FOR MASONRY ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, ARE NOMINAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. - SCALED MEASUREMENTS OF DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. - DIMENSION FOR STUD WALLS ARE TO FACE OF STUD AND DIMENSIONS FOR MASONRY WALLS ARE TO FACE OF BLOCK UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. PROJECT SUMMARY: OVERALL SITE AREA: 10.8 ACRES (470,583 S.F.) TOTAL SITE AREA (APPROXIMATE) 3.82 ACRES (166,448 S.F.) DELINEATED WETLAND AREA INCLUDING SETBACK AND BUFFER (APPROXIMATE) 6.98 ACRES' (304,135 S.F.) EFFECTIVE USEABLE SITE AREA 'INCLUDES MINOR WETLAND IMPACT AT ACCESS DRIVE CURRENT ZONING: RURAL COMMERCIAL HOLDING(RCH) PROPOSED ZONING: BUSINESS(B) SITE ADDRESS: PID #311823320007 PROPOSED USE: LOT 1: OUTLOT LOT 2: FUTURE DEVELOPMENT LOT 3: SERVICE BASED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY (ASSISTED LIVING / INDEPENDENT LIVING SENIOR COMMUNITY) LOT 4: MEDICAL/OFFICE SENIOR LIVING FACILITY: - 90 UNIT SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING / INDEPENDENT LIVING COMMUNITY - APPROXIMATELY 99,762 S.F. (NOT INCLUDING GARAGE) - 48 STALL UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE - 3 STORY BUILDING HEIGHT MEDICAL I OFFICE BUILDING: - 2 STORY MEDICAL / OFFICE BUILDING - APPROXIMATELY 24,767 S.F. ABOVE GRADE - 33 STALL UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE - SKYWAY CONNECTION TO SENIOR FACILITY (OPTIONAL) LOT 2: - FUTURE PHASE 0 N Tr- cn 111111111111111 0 5 '6 E N a E 2 S a` COVER SHEET CV OM, uo,,exrvR ocsxw mwuv uc PHILIPS C11 GARDCO Luminaire 1100/4mIEDINA SENIOR Label u Arrangement BACK -BACK SINGLE m Lumens 17473 14892 LLF 0.850 Description (2)ECPS-48L-1A-NW-G2-5W ECF-S-4E15-L.2A-N W.G2-4-UN V-LLC0.DD-BZHIS lme Wan 155 185 Total Watt, 620 BUG Rating B5-U0-03 BLUIG3 20041 179 SINGLE 12603 0111-554-130LA-8053-NW 128 1664 B3-U0 01 D SINGLE 718 0.850 B.1834-42-NW-360-UNV-BRP 41 533 B1-U2-01 WP15 SNGLE 6910 LPW33-78-BZ 21 355 B2-0002 Calculation PMeJNRTIEDINA SENIOR Mee. Ca.), Avg Avg/Mm Max/Elm FC m Property Line at Grade Illenunance 0.05 0.0 FC Beyond Prop Line at Grade Illuminance Main Walkway FC ah.de Illuminance 3. 4 13.3 0.5 7.88 26.60 No. Walkway FC at Grade Paved Area FC arGrade Fe 6 11.2 0.0 15.88 0 TIN E1111p5Gallo Ecoroam C 2 combines economy with performance In an ISO aiwa LwWlsre Capable PI eleherine up be 215,490 IIanelsd more in a toerpaet, low Kw". Lm 1ummasa. ecoFomn °alas a haw 1.0 er etelte a,+Woe. ECOR/nn regih,xef en I noraDas 1.0[1001 can Min. WhaMryayfree cormaas tO LEO try she 111e reed NI rEa1 ateattw al hake,. roan! m1w11ne odes M1teRa1 M.001 Wen%) available far further owes w.new OLIGHT FIXTURE TYPES A2, B4, AND B5 SCALE 1/4,1,0" co 1,1110S GUIRO Slenderroon ealetsges carebele LED pertem1a11u owemNa ::mod atleanord EC Meonal menaanarea!echEdoey Well Aknhtltywhe to r.,wefr wbgooa area aetaw dW w noel energy !Anent arad arYIMK.IBy r;1r14ag Slende!fonn M 005ulA py a;..hplt pedom gnse. /feek lots goofed •estpn and rid consbutlun. The aN hceG lID opDUl westerns non.. 1ES VMS II. BI. IV antl V eNtrlbualeas SOWS papteeben el0ateA welt ae !oMalEarm Mann eas ®LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE C SCALE 1/4'. 1,0" Bollards Dame/bevel lap lauver i 1 • awe. tErm Pew. COOKe rer beef ins dner DbaaindlgeeKl urdroo r emort win naNu weneltr.reg.. IC„ywfa•rrwta.wy 1wn 1eah..a wnaawnaal.e eear.s+"..+aen Our ages.exedWa.s LEP tecielabary and reabah..epowepumele marmrsal Setalam.n a.h..nri1ArK. ALL FIXTURE MOON —b —b A2 B4 & B5 C D GENERAL PARKING LOT GENERAL PARKING LOT PEDESTRIAN SCALE GENERAL PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING(COMMERCIAL) LIGHTING (SENIOR RESIDENTIAL) ILLUMINATION DETAIL ILLUMINATION -FULLY SHIELDED (>2,000(MS) -FULL SHIELDED01,000 LMS)- HILLY SHIRDED(>2,000 LMS) SITE LIGHTING KEY SCALE 1/8"=1,0" PHILIPS Mono M1RVTl ALL VALUES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL MAINTAINED FOOTCANDLES AT GRADE FIXTURE DISTRIBUTION TEMPLATES ARE SHOWN AT 025MFC FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY G HEIGHTS ARE SHOWN ADIACENT TO FIXTURE LOCATIONS ON PLAN VALUES DO NOT EXCLUDE CONTRIBUTION FROM ADJACENT STREET OR PROPERTY LIGHTING 21505-01360 e" (DI Tlr vtaq;ewe 1yl.hnl.g13 inn WO SG...K. lleff ielere,a.a4t+td,q 1.0d1.. as maeKt aKllYteey dome The deal 14.-Ke a;nanwofe-rib the-x rwlq.w and lsrlronarct lna ca.* deoeea LIM oadude aemn01laenela.aeeapea*WW1 tfib pw4r411 andia.ne rarn afters e1.1.1raneOlen, sawn, wallwaelw telsl eretric pertormance MAW n Waal N+ Palma penewws and een,Ilteanadaeenla w heal., YYOytxewn/Md.) wane lnwfl Mae.a mod!' deed nano woven. o In to to In ton zon I So MEDINA SENIOR LIVING - SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - PHILIPS LED SERIES Medina, Minnesota IIIIIIIIIIIIIII aaa� aaa� Iaa� 11 aaa� aaa� aaa� 11 aaa� 0 a` Permit Submit Date Project Number SITE LIGHTING - PHOTOMETRIC OLIGHT FIXTURE TYPE D SCALE 1/4,1,0" LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE WP15 SCALE 1/4'.1,0" OSITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SCALE 1". 40,0' A0.0 0010 VOW,. DESIGN caouauC OVERALL SITE AREA: 10.8 ACRES (470,583 S.F.) TOTAL SITE AREA (APPROXIMATE) 3.94 ACRES (171,896 S.F.) DELINEATED WETLAND AREA INCLUDING SETBACK AND BUFFER (APPROXIMATE) 6.86 ACRES' (298,687 S.F.) EFFECTIVE USEABLE SITE AREA 'INCLUDES MINOR WETLAND IMPACT AT ACCESS DRIVE ELM CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT: 25' REQUIRED WETLAND BUUFER = 55,586 S.F. CITY OF MEDINA: 30' WETLAND BUFFER REQUIRED: 66,654 S.F. PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER: 68, 045 S.F. CURRENT ZONING: RURAL COMMERCIAL HOLDING(RCH) PROPOSED ZONING: BUSINESS(B) SITE ADDRESS: PID #311823320007 PROPOSED USE: LOT 1: OUTLOT LOT 2: FUTURE DEVELOPMENT LOT 3: SERVICE BASED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY (ASSISTED LIVING / INDEPENDENT LIVING SENIOR COMMUNITY) LOT 4: MEDICAL/OFFICE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (BUSINESS DISTRICT): 25' PARKING SETBACK (FRONT AND REAR) 20' PARKING SETBACK (SIDEYARDS) 40' FRONT YARD BUILDING SETBACK (50' FROM HIGHWAY 55) 25' REAR YARD BUILDING SETBACK' 25' SIDE YARD BUILDING SETBACK (SIDEYARDSr ' MAY BE REDUCED TO 15' WHEN SHARED AMENITIES EXIST (LOT 4 REQUIRES ADDITIONAL 6" SETBACK BASED UPON BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE 35') (LOT 3 REQUIRES ADDITIONAL 10' SETBACK BASED UPON BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE 35') PROPOSED F.A.R.: LOT 1: N/A (OUTLOT) LOT 2: 4,320 S.F. 1147,642 S.F. =.03 FAR (FUTURE DEVELOPMENT) LOT 3: 99,762 S.F. / 134,240 S.F. =.74 FAR LOT 4: 24,767 S.F.I 166,089 S.F. =.15 FAR REQUIRED PARKING: SENIOR LIVING FACILITY: 90 TOTAL UNITS (MIN. 50%TO BE ASSISTED LIVING AND/OR SPECIALTY CARE) THE MEDINA CITY ORDINANCE DOES NOT IDENTIFY SENIOR LIVING OR SENIOR CARE FACILITY WITHIN SECTION 828.51, SUBD. 2, OFF STREET SPACES REQUIRED. SEE CALCULATED PARKING BELOW. MEDICAL / OFFICE BUILDING: 24,767 S.F. / 250 S.F. PER STALL =100 STALLS CALCULATED PARKING: SENIOR LIVING FACILITY (LOT 3): 451L UNITS x 2.25 SPACES PER UNIT =102 STALLS 30 AL UNITS x.4 SPACES PER UNIT =12 STALLS 15 MEMORY CARE / SPECIAL CARE SUITES x .35 SPACES I UNIT= 6 STALLS TOTAL SENIOR LIVING FACILITY PROPOSED PARKING =120 STALLS COMMERCIAL PARKING (LOT 4): TOTAL MEDICAL I OFFICE BUILDING PARKING = 24,767 / 250 S.F. PER STALL =100 STALLS TOTAL CALCULATED PARKING = 220 STALLS PROVIDED PARKING: LOT 3: 18 SURFACE STALLS +48 GARAGE STALLS = 66 STALLS LOT 4: 117 SURFACE STALLS +33 GARAGE STALLS.150 STALLS TOTAL PROVIDED PARKING = 216 STALLS • SHARED PARKING COVENANTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED BETWEEN LOTS 3 AND • PRIVATE SHUTTLE SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS WITHIN THE SENIOR LIVING FACILITY 14' PYLON SIGN: SEE DETAIL NNAA INIERNALLY ILLUMINATED LOT 1 (OUTLOT) 22,621 S.F. -~ r _ _ T .52 ACRES WETLAND IMPACT WALL SIGNAGE: SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COMMUNITY GARDEN AREAS MONUMENT SIGN, SEE DETAIL 1/5/Ad CLEAR VISION TRIANGLE CLEAR VISION TRIANGLE FUTURE CONNECTION WI CHIPPEWA ROAD TRAIL f ir-rI-I-1171� 1 L UTURt REPOND " CHASE —_ 1 _J _ r J IS PYLON SIGNAGE, SEE DETAIL ItNA4', INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED WI DYNAMIC DISPLAY ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN CHIPPEWA ROAD I I 1 COMMERCIAL ) 1 (FUTURE PHASE) 4'°•`+ 1 STORY „eA` 4,360 S F. ,e1e BOULDER RETAINING WALLS: TYPICAL 18 STALLS PATIO RETAINING WALL _ — DIN DPMTIO VEMORYCARE COURTYARD___ ENIOR ASSISTED NDEPENDENT LIVIN L STORY + GARAGE -190 UNITS 8 GARAGE STALLS d9,762 S.F NNE SKYWAY AT C 0 FLOOR 79 STALLS 11 WALL SIGNAGE', SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS F. COVERED ENTRANCE (IS FLOOR) 1.0.N11.0. SETBACK BOARDWALK ENTRANCE DELIVERY/ TRASH OFFICE I MEDICAL 2 STORY + GARAGE 33 GARAGE STALLS 0. 24,767 S.F. REAR ENTRANCE (LOWER LEVE TURNAROUND AREA LOT 2 147,642 S.F. 3.39 ACRES p'aUWNDUS LOT 3 134,240 S.F. 3.08 ACRES PI CEDAR FENCE fi WETLAND (MANAGE 1) LOT 4 166,089 S.F. 3.81 ACRES EMERGENCY _J VEHICLE TURN \tT` AftOUNU v ',PARNNGSTALLS SNOW ST6RAGE SCALE 1, 40,0" AUGUST 4, 2017 xo EA�C-a by ITITz. Medina, Minnesota IIIIIIIIIIIIIII ❑ z e a �2 N a i a` ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A -SITE £fi 36 60 Scale In Feet f I £ � A \ \ \ \ V \ � —\ oo3\ \ \' ° L17• YCV 3IIV019VOOOV �1�\z 0�' 997 :"0 Q ds°„ , \ —I �I� _ 'I—�� ££ 4! / Iw //{^}"`Cb /0,1 995 /1 i / // I r / / / - // J r 993 — / /7 i r i/ / / / / / , / / / __-1 co z---` _ " � / 1 o _\--- --i / \ y /„ �/7, I , r /�V,�— ��� —y I ,Y' / / / I \ 2j V A v va., -I' li� �v I I ry V A\ \� A `� al ( \ N. I I 1 i j 1 1 \ t \ i m / i a \\ \ \ \ ' 1 II I IFS t s \ \/ \ V \V A �� �• � rY tit / / / w 1 I i `g\ a N 0. / \ q � ) , , ��� m\ \ l r\ 1 I, oar 1) I // /.�� \ o \ 8 r // °%/ \ \ \ i ° N. \ \ \ �'\ \ I �' 1 1 v / / 1 05 cb IN 1 w R \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ F r I \ I 1 I 995 \`1 1 I / � ..1 � I _ J \ \ \ 1 ^, /// \\\ \� \\ \\ 1 0 / I I I I I/ ///�'Fm 1 0� / -L/ / / / I 1 \ ��, / /A / / 996 - 1 / i' ' I 0) � m----// i / /I 1 I. / / \ / \ J / I ¢/ CO/ a CO 1 o - \ \ \. 1 \ I / I \ \1 1 I I g '/ ig Ci I \ 1, I '\ g \ I I I l \ I Om I� Im y I I 1, / \ (i)\ / I° \ \ SOUTHERLY LINE OF I / \ �� CHIPPEWA ROAD ' \1 j \o I 1 NORTHERLY LINE OF / / / 1 ( I i = I\ \ TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 /gal / 1 1 _i I I 1 \ / .o o p wi.g 1 �� m �I 11 \ +o / - / m o c El N / N / ° < -� / �1 /m �_ / \ ^ // // /7 / /I 1 / / / / 1 1 \ �// rl�lJl II I \ 5\ I / �\ / / ( I \ a \ in o k \\ `'� � b� 0o�O� 1 3 _1 �I G I " 991- - ¢ 990 I:965 L16 �LZ 00S LINOF THE WEST 75 FEET NW 1/4 OF THE S/W 1/4 r— i f EAST LINE OF THE WEST 918.12 FEET —/ OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE S/W 1/4 1 I y / / i — � 7/ — / i/ / / / m �, U ( / / / 0 I' 4,/ ////// j -////- i \ / / / ADDRESS UNASSIGNED EXCEPT THE WEST 75 FEET THEREOF EXCEPT ROAD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN mxi s, M 12"PVC IE=898.12 23 95`1 22 (220 l_ 12. PVC IE-996.19 / V) 27 274) — _ T— _ _ 273 _-T T _ _ T T_ --�T T- , T - T — — —� \ �— �, \ . 267 - I>= ::... 276 , - 49 - - - - 255 - - - - - 50� 254 �szimmt .. _ _ _ _27527 - 245la 1 WWI* 9 r p� .KMLAL.` IM -' -i j — �/7 `rt"T �-T.:-�T 278 \• \ 2402448 ,� � 1421 , , pi ei • , _ � � 269) , � -- - C306) / \ \'; 0 (243) i #� - * .0 � �264 )-) r , � �305) irk /�'� 252 _ _ 265 T 304 24 24' 248 60 � = �268)-- / (303� - 313) 3--C302) -/, � / (219 18 \-(216)-/ /�� i 0 ,T(215) _, 13 P �,t=3= (21 OY) N O 9g5 9g6 20 9g8 0 995 t N ITIAL qEVEEOPMENT �.l • \J ,993 1 04 _: 202) ▪ \ 238g91 i ■ ■ s.*4$$$ `teeeee-eesreee=e•A%s m ■ ■ _E ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ •••s '• ••••••••••••1 CO 29b g95 9 0 (3J(3� 27 _99g-- ___ — g9�_�— WPT CAO 314 -C272D- �� (311) -r,r-> (310 307 (309 (308 300 (299 90 i10 . g91• •• 1 N. \ ` 9so \\ LOT FTVTI ORME •••••••••• \ ••••••• ••••.•�� (334 ••� 332 el,. (318 �>••• 324 , 0 Lam_ . ►�o�°�i E LOcP E \ �326 328 321 Aso #.4,4 . 325) )\\ � 1 g 5 • FF.' #F ag:I �61ia SF •S1YLiiY'L iY�rlt['> TfF gtlg4F5 9fF SF s elsi 'FF' [ -iEF+1F i[ffiF ffF IS a t3 f6 �" 7 -' 2 A + /a>� • y i4 ,.,i $ ��5� •BF F��;,F ik ��`§ �T�` Ek�L .�.s�$ 6555'S5.. S'65555 655565,b65556555 5.55 56. iq,�j N �y RRY�:6 II oi, r 5 55611 R R3R3R 5S .... .. .. .... ....... �J ....�. ...,s. .. a .:.. III. `F� .w.. ...... .� 4i g{EL�S.11 9fG5567 a nii�ki�8 F[idii11 �a4g :III! jf�6 77 5;!55a �3jfY9�#s 1 . 14iii 3a A F kF� 11�FEF [�YFF4 1I:ggi��'''�iF9��P 55S'6 .. 65 5Y 555. a. 55566�555566565566565 ons .yr a :__.__..__._ ..IA..... ..... 5655656&55Q5565RQ565¢ .�.. I .1 5 5�65555555656�55�� � � �� NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ) TOSS ONINItl1131:13H1 N0i N311 NI HStl0 9NIAVd 38llIM 1NVOIlddtl:310N r og so-ii;s•.�•• 333 '•• 335 1 •• 33 •• •• 330 ••.• 329) •, • .• .• •• • •• • .• • I. 9868" ;J zzzz :5 Nq�F/ 992 v I o I N • 992 rle v. 320 .. ssssssssss•. • • • • •• •• • • •• •• • :1 • • • 99 69 1 88 289 1 29 s ( 290) 287 I V (e \ \ \ v 0. \ \ 85 v�84 \ _ - (281)-'L,L J �h \ •••••••.44 O Iss (339) 1.98 00 w i \ i 1 a i w / F� / I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR Date OBI9A/t6 REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT r �,n ,h r.• 'Jj�.� ! =. Y ay D 1a$ N SUPERVISION AND THAT AM A DULY LICENSED{ N Project Architect PROFESSIONAL E EER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE 5 STATE OF MIN O A. Medina Senior Living Community _ A m m Permit Submit Date � _ O ' Project Number ,6963 DATE. HILL .3 ----- Q DATE: 08/ 01] LICENSE # 24551 Medina, Minnesota 3 ��i £E 30 60 Scale In Feet 616! GROSS AREA: WETLAND AREA: NET AREA: FLOOR AREA: F.A.R.: IMPERVIOUS AREA: % IMPERVIOUS(GROSS): IMPERVIOUS(NET): OUTLOTA LOT LOT LOT 23,493 SF 147,642 SF 134,240 SF 166,089 SF 1,594 SF 34,734 SF 43,611 SF 33,052 SF 21,899 SF 112,908 SF 90629 SF 133,037 SF 0 SF 0 SF 99,762 SF 24,767 SF 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.15 9,725 SF 4,903 SF 54,253 SF 51,920 SF 41.4% 3.3% 40.4% 31.3% 44.4% 4.3% 59.8% 39.0% ELM CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT REQUIRED 25' WETLAND BUFFER = 55,586 S.F. CITY OF MEDINA REQUIRED 30' WETLAND BUFFER = 66,654 S.F. PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER = 68,045 S.F. L17' 1-E9 3„E0,9 a006/ 1 T 464.64 /, i_.....-7-- y__ -----. .............. \ _ y � � / _-------- --- - ' - - � �% / j / / /// / i• ^ ------ ---� 8°36 ▪ 3UE / // f • \ J - ' 15'WETLAND UFFER �---- SETBACK if) CO 1-0 DELINEiTED WBOU=Tr NDARY W N c0 O �•lI) PREFAB !GATED ALUMINUM PIER SUPPORTED M BOARDWALK �./� (OVER WETLAND) r-}J I I I L _L _ 1 ▪ _-_ I I I▪ —r r-t- L_r_ I I _ STOIiMW TER POND I ✓ -f J \ r � BrTVMINBUS TR4+E 17 7 - I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 1111 RETAINING WALL) s i /,... ..i 1\\ W 0, NkTLAND BUFFER ''(/ \\\ -�4� OvoseD DRA{rvAGE / C� IhILITY EASE NT \ / ( \ \0 co N \ r1 I I I I n I I I I I II I I I I I I I 1 1 1 111 '1^ U \ 1 P HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1 11 \ 1 1 11 \ / // 289.61 _ A Ilini"il. BIOFILTRATION BASIN \` POROUS BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT O V— / / O SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DIMENTIONS 6,672 S.F WETLAND IMPACT (TT'LGA TIONTO BEVIAPSU)'' SING � WETLAND BANK CREDITS) 9691 3w`Ki1,Zn/QS W P PROPOSED WETLAND CV BUFFER W/MONUMENT Co SIGN o � ROUS6aTUMINOUS r PA MENTL___- 204.34 366.83 I I 1 J DEPRESSED IS D W/ RIBBON CU"B / (TYPICAL) STORMWATER POND' PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT / r----T-�� / / / / • •S/ 1 / POROUS ASPHALT HEAVY-DUTY ASPHALT BITUMINOUS TRAIL CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90° PARKING STALL IS 9' X 19' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL PRIVATE CURB AND GUTTER TO BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ADA PEDESTRIAN RAMPS IN/TRUNCATED DOMES TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL CURB CROSSINGS OF SIDEWALK. SIGNAGE & STRIPING NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. HANDICAPPED PARKING PROVIDED PER ADA CODE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL HANDICAPPED STALLS, HANDICAPPED LOGOS AND CROSS HATCH HANDICAPPED LOADING AISLES WITH BLUE PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT, 4" IN WIDTH. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS, AS SHOWN, IN WHITE PAINT. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING WHERE REQUIRED. ALL SIGNAGE NOT PROTECTED BY CURB, LOCATED IN PARKING LOT OR OTHER PAVED AREAS TO BE PLACED IN STEEL CASING, FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND PAINTED YELLOW. ALL SIGNS TO BE PLACED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. HANDICAP SIGNAGE TO BE INSTALLED 60"-66" HIGH AS MEASURED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN AS REQUIRED BY MN CODE. mxi b yr. Ng 74 A ? VA a LumKi yam" �E.�jNc. w r. h" t, N 30 dsD I- I i I 997 995 \=`- - ---995 -- -7 Al . / - 7, ,�' / i ice\ 994 i f ,, 1i • .. �� y 993 � • -........., ,� / / / 1 / -� - , 11\ = I \ I _ I �I I COi\ in \ in \ W i 31- 30' WETLAND BUFFER \ \ \ • \*•• R \ \\ v\ • I /f \I O \, cs 0, \ -I-T-I T I-T-TT-T"1 I11111111111A I \ ✓ - J LJ I \L / ) / / \ \ F - - _ _ / i -% / / '1-4_ F-I 1 I I I ;) ▪ }_� I_ 1 „ T �� p`\ I - 1 i. N� �I I ��2 1� 1\ 994 f �� \ \ 995 ' I46 -wiz - \ i 5:1 MAXIMUM SLOPE WITHIN BUFFER AREA (TYPICAL) / / / / / / / L17' I.E9 3iiE0i9Co008 I 30. WETLAND BUFFER PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER 60 Scale In Feet 969 :3 60'13 MAXIMUM SLOPE J (TYPICAL) s60 �6,6' �6T� �66' �6'6' S6� 0 ----==---- -r uc ; 417 i ,41, / / / / 1 1 I I I I M, is-ait***** ., •S[ I I I I GRADING & EROSION C'r NTROL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CO ACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' WITHIN 1-WO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCA AEON/ CONSTRUCTION, FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CITIES METRO AREA: •51-454-0002 OR TOLL -FREE: 1-800-252-1165. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOP GRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING- THE CONTRACTOR SHA IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES �' VARIATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR S LL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 4. INSTALL PERI TER EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES BEFORE BEGINNING •TE GRADING ACTIVITIES. SOME EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS BALE CHECKS A r TEMPORARY SILT PONDS MAY BE INSTALLED AS GRADING OCCURS IN THE SP'CIFIC AREA. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROLS THROUGHOUT THE GRADING rROCESS AND REMOVE WHEN TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 5. CONTRAC OR TO ADHERE TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTR• AGENCY N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT, INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENT TO MINIMIZE THE A• A DISTURBED BY GRADING AT ANY GIVEN TIME AND TO COMPLETE TURF RESTS ATION WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT AFTER COMPLETION OF GRAD G OF AN AREA. 6. ALL POSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WATER OF THE STATE OR ANY STr,RMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WHICH IS CONNECTED TO A WATER OF THE TE MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 DAYS. L CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE SURFACED WITH CRUSHED ROCK ACROSS FULL WIDTH FROM ENTRANCE POINT TO 50 FEET INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE. SEE DETAIL. INSTALL ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES FOR STAGING AREA AND OTHER SITE ACCESS LOCATIONS AS NEEDED. 8 INLET PROTECTION IS TO BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEE DETAIL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, WATERSHED DISTRICT AND N.P.D E S. PERMITS. O. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 11. MAINTAIN EXISTING EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES. RE-ESTABLISH ANY EXISTING EROSION CONTROL DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION. 13. REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALE REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS. 15. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. 16. SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS DAILY AS NEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 17. INSPECT EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. IMMEDIATELY REPAIR FAILED OR FAILING EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. 16. SEDIMENT REMOVAL - SEDIMENT DEPOSTS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. 19. ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICE IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE GRADED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED, AND SEEDED WITH THE APPROPRIATE SEED MIX AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. 20. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOIL ENCOUNTERED ON THE SITE WITH EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL, DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL. STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AND GRANULAR FILL AT LOCATIONS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. 21. EXISTING GRANULAR MATERIALS SHALL BE SEGREGATED AND STOCKPILED FOR REUSE ON -SITE. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RE -SPREAD EXISTING ON -SITE TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM THICKNESS ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED. 23. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT. 24. GRADES .SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES, CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION, LEAVE SITE READY FOR FINISH CONSTRUCTION. 25. COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL RESULT IN ALL AREAS BEING GRADED TO 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION'. BUILDING PAD AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE SITE PLAN AND PAVEMENT SECTION DETAILS FOR LOCATION AND LIMITS OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONS_ 26. FINAL GRADING TOLERANCES ARE 40.1 FEET OF PLAN GRADES. 27. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 28. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING AND SLOPING THE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE TO PROVIDE SMOOTH & UNIFORM SLOPES, WHICH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AND PREVENT PONDING IN LOWER AREAS. CONTACT ARCHITECT IF FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO GRADING PLANS ARE REQUIRED. 29. FINISHED GROUND AND SOD ELEVATION ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE 6" BELOW FLOOR ELEVATION. SLOPE GROUND AWAY FROM BUILDING A MINIMUM OF 6" IN 10 FEET, BEYOND 10 FEET REFER TO PLAN GRADES. 30. UNDER PAVEMENTS COMPACT THE UPPER THREE FEET OF SUBGRADE TO 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENS, AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BELOW THE UPPER THREE FEET OF SUBGRADE. OUTSIDE OF PAVEMENT AREAS COMPACT EMBANKMENTS TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 31. INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING W/ DUST FILTER FABRIC AROUND CONSTRUCTION SITE & PROJECT STAGING AREA AS NEEDED. 0 U cc N 0 U 0 u_ 0 F I I H I I I I 11 11 EC 0 r H� W o_ o_ 2 U Lod L.F. B' PVC C900 8" PLUG i !I 9fi L.F. 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 8' PLUG IE=980.5 30 Scale In Feet •S[ W W N �M `CO v / \‘. i � .44 \ 1-1-T-1-1 I I I LJ I I I I Lv OG5602(48.0) 1 RE 994,0 \ \ IE 992.0(12"PVC) 1E991.0 (ORIFICE) r1 I I I I) FI I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I_ _I_ 1 FES401 \ 15"RC A1,\ 11E 992.0 \ S \ ,� - \ T 1Fr Ii,,, I� C800 1 I _ ,i 8' GV 8" TEE 351 LF 8" _ _0 i _I Lk 34rii ,, �� _ __-i - �� 1==- CaMH4o2140"0)� Af FE53 IE=992 59 24" C APRON 48"0) � IE9�.0 R�=1001.3 Lt .1.88 31E0,980008 1 z/// / // /it _ / 1 / / / / / / 124 LF 12" PVC CBMH2O4 (24"X36') RE=993.0 IE=991.93 6" 45%% BEND 6" 22-1/2" BEND HYDRANT 8" GV 14 LF 6" PVC C900 8"X6" TEE 1E0'6. 8" PVC C900 8"1/6"REDUCER 50 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 2.0% 8" CAP IE=986.2 40 LF 8" PVC C900 8' CAP 8' CROSS 42 LF 8'PV 60 r_}J 1 L_ I I -r r_ _} L - TTI -�-FES501 24'1RC APR9O92N0 IF -- -IE 8"X6"REflll �3] L F. @ 8" II�VE SOR4fi 0 40% 8'vLI.K9 115 L.F. 24" RCP CL V @ 1.00% FES502 24" RC APRON IE 993.15 SANMH 2 (48'0) R-1]33 RE599.2 366 L.F. 8" PVC IE=980.1 SDR 26@0.40% SANMHI 1-' 969 L�,�6 OS 0.50% 140 L.F. 6" PVC 140 L.F. BPVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% FES201 12" PVC IE=991.0 21 LF 12" PVC@ 1.0 % CBMH2O2 (24'X346') RE=993.0 IE=991.21 20 LF 12" PVC @ 0.50% CBMH2O3 (24"X36") RE=993.0 IE=991.31 _ 114 LF 12"PVC @0.60% CBMH205(24"X36') RE=994.1O IE 992.50 1 i FES101 10" PVC IE 990.5 50 L.F. 10" PV @1.00. OCS102(48"O) RE=993.0 1E4991.0 (10" PVC) / IE=990.0(ORIFICE) 110 LF 12"PVC @4.09% 38LF 6" PVC C900 6' CAP 8,6"TEE 26 LF 6" PVC SDR 26 @ 2.0% 6" CAP B,IE=985] SANMH 3(48"� `�� R-1]33 R4985.24 IE=985.2 CBMH306 (27'O) / �� {a 7=9,970.0 .6 IE9].0 1� 67 L118. �. @0.00% 0%A .to/ PE @O.o1'o 247 L.F. B" PVC SDR 26 @ 3.00% 221 L.F. 8"'C C900 MAKES RE=10001 IE=99].0' CEIMH210(2T'O) / RE=100067 .0 E=ssTo R p B"-'VC @ / @ 0�00 /6] "PE iIN OO 0.00% CONNECT TO MANHOLE IE=9]8.00 166 .F.B"PVC C9t0 8" WET-T W/VALV GENERAL UTI ITY NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR DAYS PRIO CITIES ME SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' WITHIN TWO WORKING TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS TWIN 0 AREA: 651-454-0002 OR TOLL -FREE: 1-800-252-1166. 2_ PRIOR T4 CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY °CATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN. ANY DISCREPANC BETWEPLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNFR IMMED TELY. 3. THE TILItt CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF TH BUILDING PIPE SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING SERVICE CONNECTIONS. 4. AL UTILITY WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF DINA SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 5. NTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SEWER, /ILNATER AND PLUMBING PERMITS FROM THE Cltt'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT. UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (ASTM 0698.78 OR AASHTO T-99) FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN THREE FEET OF THE GROUND SURFACE AND 100% STANDARD PROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. ]. FIELD ADJUST ALL CASTINGS TO MATCH FINAL GRADE, 8. CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REQUIRES INSPECTION BY THE Cltt OF MEDINA. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE Cl. OF MEDINA 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF WORKING WITHIN THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY. CITY INSPECTORS MUST OBSERVE ALL WORK COMPLETED WITHIN THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY INCLUDING REMOVAL OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, EXCAVATION OF TRENCHES, PLACEMENT OF WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER, UTILITY CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING LINES, BACKFILLING AND PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT_ SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1- SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE PIPE IS P.V.C. SDR 35 FOR UP TO 18 FOOT DEPTH OF INSTALLATION AND SDR 26 FOR 18 FOOT TO 26 FOOT DEPTH OF INSTALLATION. ALL SERVICE PIPE IS P.V.C. SDR 26. 2. MANHOLES SHALL BE 48" DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-1642 WITH TYPE "B" COVER. MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO AND A MAXIMUM OF FOUR ADJUSTMENT RINGS. 3. CONSTRUCTION. IS TO WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. 4. ALL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL BE MADE BY CORE DRILLING THE MANHOLE AT THE PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS AND INSTALLING A "KOR-N-SEAL" RUBBER BOOT OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. GROUT IN THE BOOT AND FORM AN INVERT FOR THE NEW SEWER LINE. FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR BRICK STRUCTURES, CONSTRUCT AN OPENING EQUAL TO THE PIPE SIZE. GROUT AROUND PIPE TO CLOSE OPENING, AND REPAIR STRUCTURE TO CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TYPE OF CONNECTION WITH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY REQUIRED CITY INSPECTIONS NEEDED FOR CM ACCEPTANCE. WATER MAIN NOTES 1. WATERMAIN SHALL BE C900 PVC CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/AWWA CL51/AZ1.51 AND C104/A21.4. 3. 4. FITTINGS SHALL BE CLASS 250 CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/AWWA C110/A21.10 OR ANSI/AWWA C153/A21.53. HYDRANTS SHALL BE THE PACER AS MANUFACTURED BY WATEROUS CO. OR APPROVED EQUAL COMPLYING WITH THE THE CITY OF MEDINA. GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WITH RESILIENT SEAT MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C5O9. 5. WATER MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A 10 FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION TO THE STORM AND SANITARY SEWERS UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 6. WATER MAIN ELEVATION SHALL DE ADJUSTED TO PROVIDE AN 18" MINIMUM CLEARANCE TO STORM SEWER. SANITARY SEWERS AND SANITARY SERVICES AT ALL CROSSINGS. ]. CONSTRUCTION IS TO WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. 8. ALL WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA SPECIFICATIONS. 9. RESTRAIN WATER MAIN JOINTS BEYOND FITTINGS AND HYDRANT AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF MEDINA STANDARD SPEC FOR UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION. 1, ALL MECHANICAL JOINTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED WITH MEGALUGS. 11. ALL WATERMAIN FITTINGS INSTALLED WITH COR-BLUE BOLTS. 12. LENGTH OF PIPE SHOWN ON PLAN FOR HYDRANT LEADS ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF WATERMAIN TO CENTER OF HYDRANT. 13. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE ENCASEMENT PER CITY STANDARDS. 14. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF 7.5' COVER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C600 AND CONDUCTIVITY PROVISIONS CONFORMING TO ANSI/AWWA C111/A21.11. BEFORE BEING PLACED IN SERVICE, THE COMPLETED WATERMAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED AND FLUSHED IN ACCORDANCE WFTH AWWA C651 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 0 V cc co Z 0 ce u_ Z mxi b yAFP gr4 A VA a �IE.� jjxc. wLUMSKI yfr" r. h" 95\2 1 I 12" PVC 1,996.10 \9y g All \� �� e ivfasio by9? \ \ I11990 -i CIA IPPE WA' ROAD' I ✓ / y / dr• �! -- / `. q�mhnrcct-e�')(61)# ♦ - a- 'S� ••• rira <R�•*•/ \ \ \ \ \ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Date 5:3v z po Project Architect z A N—p Permit Submit Date P2 06/04r1> Project Number I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED CN PROFESSIONAL E _ EER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MIN nia 16.3 JAY R. HILL DATE: 08104 -Ot] LICENSE# 24552 S89°28'21 "E 658.53 FFE=1005.5 GFE=994.5 111111111111111 11111111111111 IE=286.39 / FFE=1005.5 GFE=994.5 T r ITS IE=993 29 IE-989. Medina Senior Living Community Medina, Minnesota W M Zs) C'M 0 O f / /\\�\ I _) / \ � \ ` = - r mxi £C I I I rs IB II I I I dSD ROVID O CC 30 60 Scale In Feet 1 Cd ILO CO u1 N N 0 CO L171.88 31C0,98000S 464.64 '/ / -- \ / /// / I - \ Imo' �� , / �/ -- y����i I I ----- --____ -- L SE 0 D FOR PRIMARY WATER SO W E FOR PRIVATE B EET _ OULEVARO IRRIG TI()-N1 r1 1-7-1-7-7-1 POIfA LE WATER SECONDARY I 1 \ I \ BACKUP SLOPPILY. 1 1 \1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r—}J I I I L_II I I \ \\\ • m CD aD 4D� L J_ S00°°36130E 289.61 D 131 op 4D \ 1 11 140 . \\ 411111Zif4°- 44J_Arr 1 1� d% • A►7® D WEILAND BUFFER 101 �11�-- -- - - MOMPROURIKelei- 6 kigUrmiti 96 ,LZaIoQS QD� U 4D CD 0 dD� dD 4D BCD Co M 0 rn USE POND FOR PRIMARY WATER SOURCE FOR SITE IRRIGATION. PROVIDE POTABLE WATER SECONDARY BACKUP SUPPLY. CD �4D QD 366.83 0 11 GD aD /dD CD s • dD / / O r- - -7 1 • CD / tr J / / LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 1 OVERSTORY TREE PER 50 FEET OF LOT PERIMETER 1 ORNAMENTAL TREE PER 100 FEET OF LOT PERIMETER 1 SHRUB PER 30 FEET OF LOT TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH = 2,133 FEET REQUIRED # OF OVERSTORY TREES = 43 REQUIRED # OF ORNAMENTAL TREES = 22 REQUIRED # OF SHURBS = 72 REQUIRED PARKING LOT AREA GREEN SPACE = 8% PARKING LOT AREA = 54,872 SF PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE PROVIDED = 4,431 SF (8.08% 0 cc co 0 ce u_ 0 z 411 a GARAGE 18425 SF 0 Medina, Minnesota IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 Project Architect Permit Submit Date Project Number GARAGE FLOOR PLAN SCALE 3132" = 1'-0" GARAGE FLOOR PLAN XO o.7..1.7,1oES. .011>10 2 BED 828 SF ACCE55 TO COMMUNITY GARDENS 828 SF L—L 1 BED 580 SF 1 BED 580 SF STUDIO 435 SF STUDIO 435 SF STUDIO 435 SF STUDIO 435 SF rzi I I LI/ 1L 1 BED 580 SF a DEMONSTRATION HITCH. DINING ROOM 2800 SF STUDIO c 395 SF FAMILY DINING RM. 1 BED 559 SF PORTED COCHERE / HOUSE- KEEPING 325 SF STUDIO 435 SF 1 BED 580 SF MAIL � A STUDIO 435 SF OFFICE / \ / \ LOBBY E_=_=_3 / k- RE PTION CONFERENCE ROOM OFFICE OFFICE WING AREA DINING AREA STAFF AREA 134 SF HOUSE- KEEPING 79 SF 1 BED 573 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT 456 SF 395 SF LL___- lui 1 HEARTH ROOM ADMINISTRATIVE 683 SF OFFICE UNISEX INTERNET BISTRO CAFE 532 SF SPECIAL CARE SURE 937 SF S.C. SUPPORT AREA 406 SF BUILDING ENGINEER 295 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT 366 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT 358 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT 366 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT 456 SF GROSS BUILDING AREA BY FLOOR LOWER LEVEL 29 WSF 1ST FLOOR 804185F 2N0 FLOOR 29210 SF SRO FLOOR 20628 SF TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA 110144 SF UNIT MIX BY TYPE 1 BED 6% 2 BED 14 16% MEMORY CARE ROOM 10 11% SPECIAL CARE UNIT 5 6% STUDIO 29 32% Gm. NMI Medina, Minnesota IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11 11 11 11 0 a` Permit Submit Date Project Number 1ST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 132"=V-0" Cr) mm„MOVE,. DES. .o11,u, FIRST FLOOR PLAN X1 2 BED 949 SF 2 BED 949 SF I - 1 BED 580 SF STUDIO 475 SF 1 BED 580SF STUDIO 475 SF a STUDIO 475 SF STUDIO 475 SF 1 BED 580 SF 1 BED 580 SF 1 BED 722 SF STUDIO 395 SF 1 BID 559 SF 2 BED 904 SF HOUSE- KEEPING 473 SF 2 BED 942 SF STAFF AREA 1045 SF OPEN TO BELOW STUDIO 475 SF 1 BED 703 SF STUDIO 475 SF STUDIO 1 BED 580 SF STORAGE 299 SF COMMUNITY LIVING AREA STORAGE 369 SF STAIR 1 BED 559 SF 2 BED 847 SF 1 BED 559 SF SKYWAY LOBBY SKYWAY CONNECTION TRANSFERS DOWN TO IST FLOOR -NO ACCESS TO CDO FLOOR WITHOUT CREDENTIALS STUDIO 475 SF STUDIO 475 SF 1 BED 619 SF Medina, Minnesota IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11 11 11 11 0 Q a` Permit Submit Date Project Number O2ND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 3132"=1,0° SECOND FLOOR PLAN X2 Ark 2 BED 949 SF 1 BED 580 SF 1 BED 580 SF STUDIO 475 SF STUDIO 475 SF STUDIO 475 SF 1 BED 580 SF 1 BED 722 SF 2 BED 904 SF HOUSEKEEPING 466 SF STUDIO 395 SF COMMUNITY LIVING AREA PUB 911 SF 1 BED 706 SF 2 BED 850 SF 477 SF STORAGE 299 SF 1 BED 559 SF MULTIPURPOSE ROOM/ CHAPEL 1251 SF STORAGE 292 SF STAIR Medina, Minnesota 17 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII a` Permit Submit Date 0 Project Number ;� 3RD FLOOR PLAN SCALE 3/32" =1'-0" THIRD FLOOR PLAN X3 oro„MOVE,. DESIGN .o11,u, STONE LAP SIDING S111CC0 MASONRY OPRESENTATION SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8" =1,0" STUCCO PERGOLA ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ®ROOF PATIO PREFINISHED METAL GUARDRAIL MASONRY SHINGLED ROOF STONE MASONRY EASE - �■ IGlgtlll&Infirm Ilplll OPRESENTATION - MAIN ENTRY ELEVATION SCALE 1/8"=1,0" ROOF n 32'-0" V _ 3RD FLOOR ,0 23' � 0" 2NDF72' LOOR n 0" V - ALUMINUM STOREFRONT EMT EXTERIOR FINISH PERCENTAGES MASONRY STONE LAP SIDING STUCCO GLAZING I OPENINGS TOTAL 7.962 SF 6984 SF 3,512 SF 10372 SF 12,134 SF 41,864 SF PORTE COCHE 19% 17% S% 26 % 30% 100% AVERAGE ROOF HEIGHT FROM ADJACENT GRADE: 4A - 2112" PERCENTAGE OF BASEMENT LEVEL UNDERGROUND: 52.7% &'-O. DYNAMIC DISP, 2267 S0, FT. OPYLON SIGN 'A' - LOT 4 SCALE 1/4"=1,0" PRECAST CAP INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN PANELS 56 SO. ET. CAST STONE PRECAST CAP NRY I INIINI IIINIB RETAINING WALL g. 0 ®PYLON SIGN -'B' - LOT 2 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0' RETAINING WALL LOWER LEVEL GARAGE MASONRY RECEIVING LAP SIDING ENTRY/EXIT TRASH ROOM ACCESS STONE STONE WALL SIGNAGE'. 95 S.F. (1,524 S.F. OVERALL WALL AREA) 15C S.F. ALLOWED PER SECTION 81E11.12/ iai ■ 1 --II II '1- --II PRECAST CAP INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN PANEL 77.33 SO. FT. CAST STONE RECAST CAP NRY SKYWAY CONNECTION 1 STAIR EGRESS EXIT LOWER LEVEL GARAGE ENIRYlEXIT OMONUMENT SIGN 'C' - LOT 3 SCALE 1/4' =1,0" SHINGLED ROOF STUCCO EUPISC.E ROOF S 32' 0' oA4.f Ng �� 3RD FLOOR n 23' VINYL WINDOW _ 2ND FLOOR /1 12' 0' CAST STONE CAP 6 SILL _ 1ST FLOOR /? 0' OWER LEVEL n -10' -0' V PRECAST CAP INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN PANEL 50 S0. FT. CAST STONE PRECAST CAP MASONRY Te.ina AIITiTMIF1 1111111111111111 11 11 11 11 0 a` 27111.111rm ter_ ©PRESENTATION - EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8,1,0" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS X4 SHINGLED ROOF STONE VINYL WINDOWS MASONRY OPRESENTATION - NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 118"=1'-0" STUCCO LAP SIDING STUCCO MASONRY SECURED MEMORY CARE COURTYARD OPRESENTATION - WEST ELEVATION SCALE 118"=1'0" STUCCO STUCCO LAP SIDING �a ever =ve 11 :f�:, IN.i �IN11 Nadi ,11111 ■ ■ ■�■ -;-, — 11I 11 11 1 ;— --I� 11 17 To —11 Imo ::�!�11 ■■ it s■ 1■ ii ■`ill -�ii ii ■ I :: 1 I 1 1 11 11 111 I111 ■ 11 11 ■ �ii ■ unu C I11 1■ ■■m■ ■m !!® ■ 11 — — "i"i111 i m uQ n1i1 ill 11i. STAIR EGRESS EXIT VINYL WINDOWS PREFINISHED METAL BALCONIES - PREFINISNED METAL GUARDRAIL RETANINO WALL SECURED MEMORY CARE COURTYARD STONE ---_ _ LAP SIDING g111' II l 11111 RETAINING WALL PREFINISHED METAL GUARDRAIL WALL SIGNAGE: SS S.F.ORM SF. OVERALL WALL AREA) 107 S.F. ALLOWED PER SECTION S1511.1L STONE CAST STONE CAP 8 SILL 1111 t l n�y1111I ouolu I 11 ,1111_u....-.. _ ..1111�1....-... I�IILIIII �{ PII1 fl _......_... EI11II ..!_m.._in_._im.. ! IIIIILII.IIIIIIEIIfIIN111111 ion IIIiIu•00,A ROOF PATIO PERGOLA SHINGLED ROOF PREFINISHED METAL GUARDRAIL PORTE COPE MAIN ENTRANCE STONE R00 ___F & 32' _ 0 3RD FLOO_.. R n 23'-0" V _ _21,1) FL00__ R ; 1T-0-0"mil 10. FL00___ R. t1 0^ Zl LOWER LEVEL Il 32. R9_Q. J06F � 3RD FLOOR 23'-0" 2ND FLOOR n SS FLOOR n OWER LEVEE 61111 CIA T e. ina ►AII TiTMIF1 1111111111111111 11 11 11 11 0 a` �mrm ter_ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS X5 O0 - GARAGE LEVEL SCAL 1/16"=1,0" E GROSS BUILDING AREA BY FLOOR GARAGE LEVEL 14904 SF 1ST FLOOR 1466E SF 2ND FLOOR 10104 SF Grand total 39665 SF GARAGE PARKING 'GARAGE LEVEL Grand total 331 33 1 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCAL 1116" = 1' 0" E O2-2ND FLOOR SCAL 1116"=1',0" E Medina, Minnesota IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 a` Permit Submit Date FLOOR PLANS A6 EXTERIOR FINISH PERCENTAGES MASONRY 11,023 SF 50% ARCH. WOOD VENEER 1,531 SF 8% STUCCO 2.455 SF 12% GLAZING I OPENINGS 4.445 SF 22% TOTAL 20.254 SF 100% AVERAGE ROOF HEIGHT FROM ADJACENT GRADE 3S'-8' 31 S.F. WALL SIGNAGE (32 S.F. ALLOWED THIS WALL) RDof n ©SOUTHWEST DETAIL ELEVATION SCAL 1/8" E 31 S.F. WALL SIGNAGE(32 S.F. ALLOWED THIS WALLI Roof 2ND FL00_'_-0" VR Ll i6 1ST FL00__ R & 0" V GARAGE LEVE. __� OSOUTHEAST DETAIL ELEVATION SCAL 1/8"=1,0' E COMPOSITE METAL PANEL � SKYWAY CONNECTION STUCCO MASONRY ONORTHWEST ELEVATION SCAL 1/8"=1,0" E �I OWEST ELEVATION - FRONT ENTRANCE SCAL 1/8"=1,0" E MASONRY - CAST STONE COMPOSITE METAL PANEL ®SOUTH ELEVATION - HIGHWAY 55 EXPOSURE SCAL 1/8'=1,0" E SKYWAY CONNECTION WALL SIGNAGE 30 S.F. (333 S.F. WALL AREA) 30 S.F. ALLOWED PER SECTION 815.11.1.13 WALL SIGNAGE 134 S.F. (WALL AREA 3,073 S.F.) 163 S.F. ALLOWED PER SECTION 013.11.1b 1 URGENT CARE Medina Medical Clinic ARCHITECTURAL WOOD VENEER Roaf n ONRY PREFINISHED METAL COMPOSITE PANEL 2ND FLOOR n ALUMINUM STOREFRONT MAIN ENTRY 1STFLOOR n 0" GARAGE LEVE. L n 10'-0" V COMPOSITE METAL PANEL STUCCO Roof 28 0" CAST STONE MASONRY ARCHITECTURAL WOOD VENEER 2ND F1LO8'-OR0" S - ALUMINUM WINDOWS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT MAIN ENTRY _ _ 1ST FL00Rp" n COMP SITE METAL PANEL STUCCO Raof MASONRY CAST STONE EXTERIOR DECK GUARDRAIL _ _ _2ND FL00R 6' -0"AP ARCHITECTURAL WOOD VENEER ALUMINUM WINDOWS 1ST FLOC, RAGE E -1D'-o" LOWER LEVEL GARAGE ACCESS - MASONRY GARAGE LE 10'VEL0Ll " V Medina, Minnesota IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11 11 11 11 0 Q a` Permit Submit Date Project Number EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS OSOUTHEAST ELEVATION SCAL 1/8'=1'-0" E A7 0.7 AIO ENvm DESIGN .011 10 PERSPECTIVE - SOUTH VIEW FROM HIGHWAY 55 PERSPECTIVE - SOUTHEAST VIEW FROM HIGHWAY 55 O o.) .8 a) ca 2 Te.ina 1111111111111111 alinlit$11:111111.FITML...J&I, EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES X8 nem AIONIFNINAI DES. GROUP„, PERSPECTIVE - SENIOR BUILDING MAIN ENTRY O o.) O a) ca 2 es ina 1111111111111111 217MIEMI:111111MTML...tikLIL PERSPECTIVE - NORTH VIEW FROM CHIPPEWA ROAD a_ X9 OEM mar<xvm DE GROUPED° EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES Agenda Item # 8C MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: August 8, 2017 MEETING: August 15, 2017 SUBJECT: 16" Trunk Watermain Report History: In 1985 Medina installed a trunk watermain linking the well fields on the east side of town to the water tower on the west side. At the time, the watermain was placed within the ROW on Highway 55 out of the drive lanes for ease of access, less costly maintenance and repairs. As the years have passed, the highway has been widened in several areas making access difficult, repairs very costly, and increasing the potential for high impact to vehicular traffic. Currently: Along with the pipe being under the highway in some places, the pipe is also aging and beginning to break more frequently. The City has had two watermain breaks in the past four years along this stretch between Arrowhead and Mohawk Drives, most recently in July 2017. City crews ended up shutting down the Hennepin County Public Works building and Loram for the afternoon, not to mention all the traffic issues. The City has slowly been moving east to west with a secondary pipe over the years and has made it as far as Arrowhead Drive by way of Meander and the Foxberry Farms loop. From Arrowhead west, there is no redundant watermain connection to bypass flow during a break if the connection to the water tower is lost. With the DR Horton development concept, a few years back, the City was close to extending watermain to Mohawk by way of the Chippewa East connection. This is still a viable option as a redundant pipe and critical looping connection as we look for a solution to the Highway 55 trunk main. Moving forward: It is time to take a look at the infrastructure needs required for dependable water service to support current and future homes and businesses in this area of Medina. I think the time is right due to proposed development and the aging pipes. Staff is working with the City Engineer as to options available to address our current situation, including a replacement pipe, pipe lining, pipe bursting, or other viable options. Conclusion: As Public Works Director and manager of the utilities, having the City in what I might call a vulnerable situation makes me very uneasy. I suggest we look into options for the current trunk main and also a secondary pipe via Chippewa East. I have attached information outlining the costs associated with the watermain break (invoice from Burschville Construction and spread sheet with hours spent from Police and PW Departments), as well as a map showing the site where the break took place. There will also be a PowerPoint presentation at the meeting showing pictures of the break. Burschville Construction, Inc. 11440 8th Street NE PO Box 65 Hanover, MN 55341 Bill To City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Invoice 8/ Date Invoice # 5/2017 4249 P.Q. No. Terms Project Net 30 Quantity Description U/M Rate Amount 1 1 1 1 7/6/17 - State Highway 55 West -bound Lanes Water Main Break Repair Burschville Crew, including river rock & 17 TN load of CL 5 recycled (LS) Traffic control (LS) Klein Underground - saw cutting & patching asphalt 11" depth (LS) HD Supply - water main fitting materials picked up by the City of Medina, but billed to Burschville 4,950.00 2,350.00 15,650.25 1,802.00 4,950.00 2,350.00 15,650.25 1,802.00 Thank you for your business! Total S24,752.25 Chief Belland Sgt. Nelson Officer McGill Reserve Officer Chorley Officer Mckinley Total Cost Steve Scherer Ivan Dingmann Jack Gleason Greg Leuer Derek Renking Joe Ende Total Cost Water Main Break Police Time Hours Hourly Rate Dollars 6 $ 51.14 $ 306.84 5 $ 42.04 $ 210.20 4 $ 35.94 $ 143.76 4 $ 25.00 $ 100.00 4 $ 32.95 $ 131.80 Public Works Time Hours Hourly Rate $ 892.60 Dollars 6 $45.01 $270.06 6 $36.73 $220.38 6 $33.84 $203.04 6 $34.33 $205.98 10 $31.50 $315.00 10 $24.57 $245.57 $1,460.03 City of Medina Watermain Improvements Review Medina, MN 8/10/17 MEDINA A 0 450 Feet 1 inch = 450 feet A �w W B Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Agenda Item # 8D CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2017- RESOLUTION TO CONTRACT WITH A COUNCIL MEMBER WHEREAS, the City of Medina desires to have Highway 55 Rental furnish the following items for Medina Celebration Day: Rental of one canopy tent (20x40), two 20 x 20 tents, one 10 x 10 canopy with grey flooring, two kid's games, Inflatable Mini Golf, and two small popcorn poppers, as well as purchase of three cases of popcorn and 600 bags; and WHEREAS, Jeff Pederson is a Council Member of the City and will be financially interested in the contract; and WHEREAS, it is determined that the contract price of $1800 is as low as, or lower than, the price at which the goods can be obtained elsewhere at this time; WHEREAS, the contract is not one that is required to be competitively bid; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota that the City Clerk is directed to make the above -mentioned rental and purchase on behalf of the City from Jeff Pederson of Highway 55 Rental at a contract price of $1800. It is also resolved that the Mayor and City Clerk are directed to issue an order -check to pay the claim on the filing of an affidavit of official interest by the interested official as required under Minn.Stat.§471.89. This resolution is passed to comply with the provisions of Minn.Stat.§§471.87-.89. Dated: August 15, 2017. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted Resolution No. 2017- August 15, 2017 Affidavit of Official Interest in Claim STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN I, , being duly sworn state the following: 1) I am a City Council Member of the City of Medina, MN. 2) On September 16, 2017, the following equipment will be furnished by Hwy 55 Rental to the City of Medina: One 20 x 40 tent, two 20 x 20 tents, one 10 x 10 canopy with grey flooring, two kid's games, Inflatable Mini Golf, and two small popcorn machines (including popcorn and bags). 3) The contract rental price for such equipment and supplies will be approximately $1800, which includes a 25% discount off the regular rental rate as a donation, but delivery, pick up and all labor fees will be charged at regular rates. 4) At the time the equipment is rented to the City, I will have the following personal financial interest in this contract: I am one of the owners in Hwy 55 Rental. To the best of my knowledge and belief the contract rental price is as low as, or lower than the price at which the equipment could be rented from other sources. I further state that this affidavit constitutes a claim against the City for the contract rental price, that the claim is just and correct, and that no part of the claim has been paid. Council Member Jeff Pederson Subscribed and sworn to before me this Notary Signature day of , 2017. August 15, 2017 Susan Van Cleaf, Medina Reporter Press & News 33 Second St. N.E. Osseo, MN 55369 RE: 15 Years of Service Covering the City of Medina Dear Susan, On behalf of the Medina City Council, I would like to thank you for your 15 years of dedicated service covering the Medina area. You have done an exceptional job of covering important, memorable stories that have impacted the lives of our residents. A few of those impactful stories have included; the arrival of the Medina Target, the search for a home for Police and Public Works, the opening of the water treatment plant and Medina Celebration Day. Our residents are able to count on your reporting expertise to stay informed regarding critical City projects and issues. The City of Medina greatly appreciates your years of service and the depth of knowledge you are able to bring to our residents and businesses. We look forward to your continued coverage of the Medina Community. Sincerely, Bob Mitchell Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: August 10, 2017 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates — August 15, 2017 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) Crosby/Snow 2nd Home CUP — 2402 Hamel Road — Buddy and Kim Snow have requested a conditional use permit to construct a 2nd principal single family home on property owned by Kim's parents. The RR district allows a 2nd home on properties over 40 acres for family, employees or guests. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the July 11 meeting and unanimously recommended approval. The Council reviewed on August 2 and directed staff to prepare a resolution of approval which will be presented on August 15. B) Lunski Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, Site Plan Review — Lunski, Inc. has applied for approvals for a development of 90 units of mixed senior housing, 24,767 s.f. of office, and 4,100 s.f. commercial north of Highway 55 and west of Mohawk Drive. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the July 11 Planning Commission meeting. The Commission tabled the request in order to allow the applicant to update plans to meet comments from the Elm Creek Watershed and City Engineer. Staff presented the request to the Commission on August 8 and this item will go to the City Council on August 15. C) OSI Lot Line Rearrangement — Open Systems International (OSI) has requested approval of a lot line rearrangement (division and combination) between their property at 4101 Arrowhead Drive and the adjacent outlot to the southeast. The applicant intends to extend their parking lot into this area. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request on August 8 and unanimously recommended approval. Staff will present the request to the City Council on August 15. D) McDonald's Variance — McDonald's has requested a variance to reduce the required setback for a replacement trash enclosure. The existing enclosure is being removed by Hennepin County in connection with the County Road 116 improvement project and needs to be relocated. The Planning Commission reviewed the request at the August 8 meeting and unanimously recommended approval. Staff intends to present the request to the City Council for a public hearing on September 5. E) School Lake Nature Preserve CD-PUD — Wally and Bridget Marx have requested review of a PUD General Plan of development and preliminary plat for a conservation design subdivision to include 6 lots and conservation of 70 acres (11.76 buildable). The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the June 13 meeting and unanimously recommended approval. The applicant has adjusted plans in light of recent City Council direction to include a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres in rural CD-PUD projects. Staff intends to present the request at the September 19 City Council meeting. F) Excelsior Group Comp Plan Amendment and Concept Plan — The Excelsior Group has requested a comprehensive plan amendment for the City to amend the staging of development for property located north of Chippewa Road and west of Mohawk Drive for a 68-lot single-family subdivision. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 8 and generally did not find that the request met the criteria for developing earlier than the staging plan dictates. The Park Commission is scheduled to review on August 16 and the Council on September 5 or 19. Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 August 15, 2017 City Council Meeting G) Reserve of Medina First Addition — Toll Brothers has requested approval of the second phase of the Reserve of Medina project. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and will present to Council when complete, potentially at the September 19 meeting. H) Hamel Road Thirty Two Plat (combination) — 32 Hamel Road LLC has requested approval of a plat to combine 3 lots at 32-42 Hamel road into a single parcel. The City had previously approved of this lot combination, but it was not finalized by a previous owner. The Planning Commission reviewed at the July 11 meeting and recommended approval. The City Council adopted a resolution of approval on August 2. Staff will await a plat for signature and close the file. I) Johnson ADU CUP, Dykhoff Septic Variance, Hamel Brewery, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery — The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. J) Woods of Medina — This preliminary plat has been approved and staff is awaiting a final plat application K) Capital Knoll, Hamel Haven subdivisions — These subdivisions have received final approval. Staff is working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before the plats are recorded Other Projects A) Comprehensive Plan — The draft Comprehensive Plan has been routed to affected jurisdictions for their review. Staff has received preliminary comments from the Met Council and is meeting with the various departments to clarify some matters. B) Closed Landfill regulations — staff has drafted an ordinance related to the Woodlake Landfill as required by the MPCA in connection with the state's closed landfill program. The ordinance includes requirements which extend onto adjacent property. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the ordinance at the August 8 meeting and tabled the ordinance. Neighboring property owners raised concerns related to the impact of the ordinance on their property values. The Planning Commission directed staff to evaluate the ordinance to determine how the impacts of the ordinance could be reduced on property owners while still meeting state mandates. C) Minnehaha Creek Watershed Management Plan — staff attended a meeting related to the draft Minnehaha Creek Management Plan. The District is seeking to shift the focus of the Plan from a regulatory document to a guide for partnering with cities in achieving goals on a subwatershed and regional basis. The public comment period is through the early September. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 August 15, 2017 City Council Meeting MEMORANDUM MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT 600 Clydesdale Trail Medina, MN 55340.9790 p:763.473.9209 f: 763.473-8858 non -emergency: 763.525.6210 Emergency 9-1-1 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Mayor Robert Mitchell and City Council Edgar J. Belland, Director of Public Safety, Through City Administrator Scott Johnson August 11, 2017 Department Updates Night to Unite On August 1st we held our Night to Unite event. The night was a great success. We had 12 parties that were very well attended. Each year, the event grows in the number of residents that participate. Community Service Officer Andrew Scharf, Crime Prevention Specialist Steve Lundell and Intern Patrick Johnson all worked hard to make this a success. It was great to have the entire Medina City Council participate in the event. Hiring Process I have offered Andrew Scharf, our current Community Service Officer (CSO), the open patrol position pending him passing the Minnesota Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Test and receiving Medina City Council approval. With the council approval, Andrew would have a start date of August 16, 2017. If Andrew is approved, I will ask the City Council for permission to post the open CSO position. Patrol by Sergeant Nelson Training Officer Boecker attended Cloned Credit Card training in St. Paul at the Bureau of Criminal Investigation. Patrol Activities For the dates of July 26 to August 8, 2017, our officers issued 26 citations and 67 warnings for various traffic infractions. There were a total of five traffic accidents, 10 medicals, 10 alarms and one DWI arrest. On July 26, 2017, Officer Gregory took a counterfeit report at Casey's General Store. Officer Gregory was informed that a male had come into the store and asked the clerk if he could get (2) $50 bills in exchange for a $100 dollar bill. The male was given the money and it was then found out that it was a fake or counterfeit bill. The case has been forwarded to Investigations. On July 28, 2017, Officer Gregory was patrolling on Highway 55 when a vehicle came up from behind at a high rate of speed coming within inches from striking the rear of the fully marked squad. Officer Gregory then pulled over and let the vehicle pass. When passing, the vehicle almost sideswiped the squad. Officer Gregory then attempted to stop the vehicle. The vehicle turned and ran a red light, going in the ditch, and eventually ran over a curb and came to a stop. The driver was a 24 year old female who was found to be intoxicated. The female tested .17. There were two other females in the vehicle at the time. They were just coming from a bar in Plymouth. On July 29, 2017, Officer Hall was dispatched to a disturbance in the Baker Park Campground. It was after 3 am. The subjects were located and a female was found to have a felony warrant for her arrest from Dakota County. She was arrested and transported to Hennepin County Jail for booking. On August 1, 2017, Officer Boecker took a report of theft of rings. Homeowner reported that she had rings missing after a cleaning crew had been at the residence. Case is being investigated. On August 2, 2017, I responded to Casey's General Store for a male who was reported as a "slumper." Upon arrival, I recognized the male as someone I had dealt with the previous day and found him to be homeless and living out of his vehicle. The male appeared to be under the influence of something as his pants were down below his knees and one door was open with one foot outside. After a short time, I was able to awaken the male and while doing so, I noticed several hypodermic needles inside the vehicle. The male became combative and was subsequently arrested for disorderly conduct and he was transported to the Hennepin County Jail. Investigations by Investigator Kevin Boecker Investigated a report of jewelry taken by a cleaning company from a residence. Interviews were conducted of the cleaning crew with cooperation of the cleaning company. The jewelry has not been recovered at this point and all parties spoken to have denied involvement. Photos of person presenting counterfeit currency was posted on our Facebook page in an attempt to ID the suspect. Subpoena sent out for bank surveillance video footage where suspect had cashed two forged checks. Investigation continuing in regards to a theft case from a local business. Numerous documents were recovered from company laptop which are being analyzed to see if any further evidence is found. Additional victims were contacted regarding an intern& sales fraud case. Additional Victims confirmed in New York ($1500) and Ohio ($17,400). A new search warrant was sent requesting more bank records from the bank involved. There are currently 10 open cases assigned to investigations. MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: August 8, 2017 MEETING: August 15, 2017 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • We received our second pothole complaint for the year. It was on Welcome Drive. I only bring this up because the complaint was that I have neglected this for years and they sent it to the Mayor instead of me. I just wanted the Council to know that if I had been notified by the resident, I would have taken care of it. It should be done by the time you read this. • The 116/55 project is going strong and we are about 50% through the watermain project and starting to move along much faster. Once the utilities are complete, things will progress at a much faster pace. There is no long term schedule, but I do believe this will go on into early November. This is not official, just my guess. Complaints have been few. I do believe people are frustrated, but also excited to have this improvement project done. • The Clydesdale turnabout concrete replacement is complete. Once again there has been some frustration, but the businesses are happy to see this cleaned up. • The Clydesdale paving project will begin after the east side of the 116/55 project is complete. WATER/SE WER/ST ORMWATER • Public Works has been working daily with the 55/116 contractor coordinating watermain work. This project will provide long-term improvements to the trunk line system. Along with those improvements come a lot of complicated shutdowns and connections as we move through the process. Keeping everyone in service has been a challenge and a lot of staff time has been committed to this project. • We will be having a pre -con meeting for the Water Tower Rehab Project soon. I will also be working with Police and Fire so they have a full understanding of our limitations during the shutdown of the tower. • The Heath Department conducted its annual review of our system. There are only a few minor things to address. • In your packet is information about the Rural Water Trunk Line, connecting the tower and the water treatment plant, which will be discussed at the City Council Meeting. • The Sewer Lining Project will not begin until the 55/116 project is substantially complete. " PW will be replacing a leaking valve just outside of the 116 project. We are able to utilize the existing traffic control and are hoping to work under the existing permit with the County. . PARKS/TRAILS " Public Works continues to spend time keeping up the parks and trails. We have a great park system and it is used a lot more these days. " The Park Shelters have had quite a few more rentals than other years which keeps the guys busy setting up and making sure everything was cleaned up afterward. MISCELLANEOUS " Medina Celebration Day is just around the corner and PW will once again have a hand in helping set up, tear down and have staff there during the celebration to show off equipment and be on hand as needed. Page 2 of 2 ORDER CHECKS AUGUST 3, 2017 - AUGUST 15, 2017 046195 MOHAN CHETTIAR $250.00 046196 FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL $500.00 046197 TIM FLEMMING $500.00 046198 HUTTON, MEGHAN $150.00 046199 ORONO BASEBALL ASSN. $500.00 046200 STUMNE DEBRA $46.98 046201 CENTURYLINK $227.40 046202 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. $3,728.50 046203 KUMAR, RENU $250.00 046204 LYNCH, LINDA $150.00 046205 TAYLOR, MARLYS $150.00 046206 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC $104.94 046207 ANDERSON HEEB LLC $1,817.15 046208 ASPEN MILLS INC $231.85 046209 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN $28,733.68 046210 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS $4,757.37 046211 BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION INC $32,722.25 046212 CENTERPOINT ENERGY $212.56 046213 COMMERCIAL DOOR SYSTEMS INC $836.48 046214 CONTEMPORARY IMAGES $1,864.67 046215 DINIUS FENCE LLC $4,480.00 046216 DESIGNING NATURE, INC. $45.55 046217 DIAMOND MOWERS INC. $502.43 046218 EARL F ANDERSEN INC $1,154.04 046219 ECM PUBLISHERS INC $292.87 046220 EGAN $810.69 046221 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL $363.15 046222 GRAINGER $8.46 046223 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I $500.00 046224 HAMEL LUMBER INC $315.33 046225 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH $955.20 046226 HENN CTY RESIDENT/REAL ESTATE $46.00 046227 HENRYS WATERWORKS INC $877.00 046228 LANO EQUIPMENT INC $8.37 046229 LARKIN AUTO $755.74 046230 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC $63.00 046231 CITY OF LONG LAKE $13,007.50 046232 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN $1,860.75 046233 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL $9,840.60 046234 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL $25,399.93 046235 METRO ALARM CONTRACTORS INC $360.00 046236 METRO WEST INSPECTION $432.00 046237 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $3,132.36 046238 OFFICE DEPOT $360.57 046239 CITY OF ORONO $4,375.30 046240 RDJ SPECIALTIES, INC. $133.29 046241 SAMS LAWN & LANDSCAPE INC $235.90 046242 SCHMIDT CURB COMPANY INC $18,879.00 046243 JAMIE R WIOME $5,533.40 046244 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC $99.05 046245 STREICHER'S $102.99 046246 SUNRISE PAINTING WALLCOVERING $7,400.00 046247 SURPLUS SERVICES $760.00 046248 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI $2,878.22 046249 TIMESAVER OFFSITE $139.00 046250 VACKER INC $494.00 046251 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $102.19 046252 WSB & ASSOCIATES $26,687.94 046253 ZIEGLER INC $1,092.74 Total Checks $212,218.39 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS AUGUST 3, 2017 — AUGUST 15, 2017 004250E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL $125.00 004251E PIVOTAL PAYMENTS INC $19.99 004252E PIVOTAL PAYMENTS INC $19.99 004253E PIVOTAL PAYMENTS INC $19.99 004254E PR PERA $14,283.96 004255E PR FED/FICA $17,072.86 004256E PR MN Deferred Comp $2,320.00 004257E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA $3,425.64 004258E SELECT ACCOUNT $736.07 004259E CITY OF MEDINA $21.00 004260E SELECT ACCOUNT $259.92 004261E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC. $4,923.30 004262E CULLIGAN-METRO $108.48 004263E CULLIGAN-METRO $99.60 004264E FRONTIER $56.60 004265E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC $657.34 004266E PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE BY PHONE $1,000.00 004267E PREMIUM WATERS INC $12.54 004268E SELECT ACCOUNT $58.50 004269E SELECT ACCOUNT $5,702.65 004270E VERIZON WIRELESS $1,279.73 004271E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL $52.00 004272E PR FED/FICA $33.90 004273E AFLAC $394.88 004274E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC $219.90 004275E ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICE $2,874.82 Total Electronic Checks $55,778.66 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AUGUST 9, 2017 0508075 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L $1,332.97 0508076 ANDERSON, JOHN G $230.87 0508077 BARNHART, ERIN A. $2,099.87 0508078 BELLAND, EDGAR J $2,570.17 0508079 BOECKER, KEVIN D. $2,383.02 0508080 CONVERSE, KEITH A $2,140.95 0508081 COUSINEAU, LORIE K. $230.87 0508082 DINGMANN, IVAN W $2,033.54 0508083 ENDE, JOSEPH $1,456.49 0508084 FINKE, DUSTIN D. $2,178.54 0508085 GALLUP, JODI M $1,752.05 0508086 GLEASON, JOHN M. $1,779.60 0508087 GREGORY, THOMAS $1,945.43 0508088 HALL, DAVID M. $2,020.74 0508089 JESSEN,JEREMIAH S $2,001.80 0508090 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. $2,230.19 0508091 KIESER, NICHOLAS $746.60 0508092 KLAERS, ANNE M $1,154.57 0508093 LANE, LINDA $1,492.96 0508094 LEUER, GREGORY J. $1,980.39 0508095 MARTIN, KATHLEEN M $230.87 0508096 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R $1,470.19 0508097 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D $1,658.80 0508098 MITCHELL, ROBERT G. $327.07 0508099 NELSON, JASON $2,981.97 0508100 PEDERSON,JEFF $221.92 0508101 PETERSON, DEBRA A $1,684.69 0508102 REINKING, DEREK M $1,591.50 0508103 SCHARF, ANDREW $599.48 0508104 SCHERER, STEVEN T. $2,289.29 0508105 VIEAU, CECILIA M. $1,138.39 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $47,955.79