Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2018-06-12 packetIndividuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call 573-634-6410 for information regarding agenda items NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING AND TENTATIVE AGENDAi City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Tuesday, June 12, 2018 ~ 6:00 p.m. John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street City Council Chambers TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Introductions and Roll Call 2. Procedural Matters Determination of quorum Call for cases Receive and review requests for continuance Receive requests for reordering the agenda Format of hearing List of exhibits 3. Adoption of Agenda (as printed or reordered) 4. Approval of May 1, 2018, Regular Meeting Minutes 5. Communications Received 6. New Business a.100 St. Mary’s Medical Plaza Demolition Clearance b. 1732 Vieth Dr Demolition Clearance c.1736 Vieth Dr Demolition Review 7. Section 106 Review a.420 Case St 8. Other Business a.Façade Improvement Committee Appointment b. Staff Updates on Prior Actions 9. Dates to Remember a.Next Meeting, July 10, 2018, at 6:00 pm 10. Adjournment City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Minutes Regular Meeting – Tuesday, May 1, 2018 Council Chambers – John G. Christy Municipal Building 320 E. McCarty Street Commission Members Present Attendance Record Mary Schantz 6 of 6 Steven Hoffman 6 of 6 Bill Case 6 of 6 Donna Deetz 6 of 6 Art Hernandez 5 of 6 Nathan Percy 6 of 6 Doug Record 5 of 6 Commission Member Not Present Jane Moore 5 of 6 Council Liaison Present Laura Ward Staff Present Sonny Sanders, Planning and Protective Services Director Eric Barron, Planning and Protective Services Planning/MPO Manager Jayme Abbott, Neighborhood Services Manager Sheri Johnston, Neighborhood Services Specialist Kelly English, Neighborhood Services Assistant and Commission Secretary Bryan Wolford, Associate City Counselor Guests who Testified During Public Hearing Jenny Smith, property owner of 2 parcels of land in the proposed district Jane Beetem, resident at 1612 Payne, Jefferson City Patsy Johnson, Jefferson City Cultural Arts Foundation and 908 Lafayette St. resident Tony Smith, property owner of 2 parcels of land in the proposed district Rev. Dr. Cassandra Gould, Quinn Chapel AME Church Glover W Brown, Friends of Lafayette and the Historic Foot District Matt Holland, had rental property in the proposed district Tristan Hayes, 412 Lafayette St. resident in the proposed district Call to Order Mary Schantz called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Adoption of Agenda Donna Deetz moved the agenda be adopted as printed. Steven Hoffman seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Approval of Minutes Steven Hoffman moved the minutes from the April 10, 2018, Regular Meeting be approved as printed. Bill Case seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. New Business School Street Local Historic District Application and Proposed Design Guidelines Eric Barron presented the staff report on the School Street Local Historic District Application and the Proposed Design Guidelines. He informed the Commission of the following staff concerns regarding the application: 2  Lack of strong connection between historic events and boundaries of district,  Architecture, while being reminiscent of early century buildings, lacks notable or defining elements,  Lack of historic identity amongst the general public,  Conflict with prior historic studies. Eric Barron stated that the Proposed Design Guidelines are fairly typical for a historic district, and only apply to exterior changes to houses in the School Street Local Historic District. He stated that the Design Guidelines would not be part of a subjective review process with the commission acting as the review board for any proposal to modify buildings in the area. Eric Barron recommended that Commission Members carefully consider the information put forward as justification for the historic district designation, as well as the level of historic designation that is sought. The following citizens were present to testify about the School Street Local Historic District:  Jenny Smith is the applicant for the proposed historic district and spoke in favor of the Local Historic District application. Jenny and Tony Smith live at 1211 Elmerine Ave., Jefferson City. They own 2 parcels within the proposed School Street Historic District; 612 and 614 E. McCarty St. Jenny said FEMA had informed several interested individuals, via conference call and an email that the City was in charge of managing local flood plains. She believes the local historic designation would lift restrictions imposed by the FEMA flood plain regulations regarding the 50% substantial improvement rule in the proposed district. Jenny said she thought it would allow property owners in the area the ability to further improve their homes which would revitalize the area. She said if the structures are demolished, FEMA prohibits new construction on the area.  Art Hernandez asked Jenny Smith why was the application was filed now and not years earlier. He stated that many of the structures need significant rehabilitation. Jenny responded that it should have been done earlier. She said they are hoping with the lifting of the 50% substantial improvement rule, it will allow more opportunities for property owners to make necessary improvements to the properties in the proposed district. Art said it appeared, by the viewing the signatures on the application, that about 80% of the homes are not owner-occupied.  Jane Beetem is a resident at 1612 Payne Dr., Jefferson City, and she spoke in favor of the application. She explained the reasoning given to the boundaries of the proposed Local Historic District application. She said about 25% of the properties are owner- occupied. She said Quinn Chapel was not included in the proposed district due to it being a newer building, less than 10 years old. She said many of the property owners cannot obtain a building permit for the expensive repairs needed at this time, but hopes that if the designation as a Local Historic District is in place, the 50% rule will be waived so that the necessary repairs can be done. She said property owners want to fix up their properties but just aren’t allowed to right now.  Patsy Johnson, of 908 Lafayette St., Jefferson City, spoke in favor of the Local Historic District application as a life-long resident and as a member of the Jefferson City Cultural Arts Foundation. 3  Tony Smith, of 1211 Elmerine Ave., Jefferson City, owns 2 parcels within the proposed School Street Historic District. He spoke in favor of the Local Historic District application.  Rev. Dr. Cassandra Gould, is Pastor of Quinn Chapel AME Church at 415 Lafayette St., and spoke neutrally about the Local Historic District application. She disagrees with the current boundaries of the proposed district, and feels they were excluded from the proposed historic district. She stated Quinn Chapel is very invested in the area that has been historically African American. She feels the exclusion in the historic district is reminiscent of segregation, and feels it is insulting. She would like the matter to be put on hold so that more people could weigh in on the matter to see what is feasible for the area. She would like to see an opportunity for commerce in the area, and if it becomes a historic district that it may affect zoning for commercial use. The neighborhood is declining because there is nothing there.  Glover Brown, Exec. Director of the Friends of Lafayette St. and the Historic Foot District. He is a resident at 1700 Valley High Rd. He disagrees with the current boundaries of the proposed district. He said in his opinion the applicants are planning to use the proposed designation to get around FEMA’s 50% rule to improve properties to enhance their personal investments. Glover requested the Commission Members table the motion to approve the Local Historic District application until the next meeting to allow time to do research and put an economic development package prepared for 408 Lafayette, 624 E. McCarty and 410 Lafayette St.  Matt Holland, and a partner are property owners of 624 E. McCarty St., Jefferson City. Matt spoke neutrally regarding the Local Historic District application. His rental property is not in the flood plain and he is 100% indifferent to what happens.  Art Hernandez asked Bryan Wolford for counsel regarding what effect tabling the application would have on the application itself. Bryan Wolford stated if the Commission does not act on the Local Historic District application at this meeting, or if they table the agenda item, the applicants will have to reapply for the designation as School Street Local Historic District and resubmit the application. Bryan said according to a provision in City Code, in Section 847, a continuance must be requested by the applicant before the hearing process has begun.  Tristan Hayes, of 412 Lafayette St. and life-long resident of the area, spoke in favor of the Local Historic District application. He has watched the neighborhood decline and would like it to be revitalized again.  Art Hernandez moved to approve the School Street Local Historic District Application. Donna Deetz seconded the motion. Motion passed.  Donna Deetz moved to approve the School Street Local Historic District Proposed Design Guidelines. Nathan Percy seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Old Business Landmark Designation – 1213 Elmerine Ave. Jayme Abbott presented the staff report for the amended Landmark Designation application submitted by Kevin and Judy Murray for their home at 1213 Elmerine Ave. The property is not the Dalton house, as previously thought, but it is the Collette house. Staff recommends that the property be considered for the Landmark Designation Award. If approved, the property will be considered for approval by Council during the May 7 Council Meeting. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED Demolition of 100 St Mary’s Medical Plaza June 12, 2018 Sender How Received Date Received Walter Schroeder Email 6/4/18 Carol Poteat Email 5/30/18 Stuart and Mary Ann Murphy Email 5/30/18 Johnston, Sheri From: Stratman, Anne Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 9:43 AM To: Johnston, Sheri Cc: Abbott, Jayme Subject: FW: Old St. Marys Hospital Attachments: St Marys Hospital.doc From: walterschroeder(&centurytel.net[mailto:walterschroeder@centurytel.net] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 7:08 AM To: Stratman, Anne Cc: hcjprez Subject: Old St. Marys Hospital I am attaching a statement of support for the demolition of St. Marys Hospital with the understanding that its stones will be used in the construction of a new building on that site. Walter A. Schroeder 1 St. Marys Hospital jeplanninggj effcitymo.org June 3, 2018 I understand the reasoning for the demolition of old St. Marys Hospital, and 1 support it, with the understanding that its stones will be used in the construction of a new building on the site. Those interested in the property should be aware that before the hospital was built on that site, it was the location of the Franz Brewery. By 1873, less than a decade after the Civil War and thirty years before the hospital, Lorenz and Andreas Franz, Bavarian immigrants, built and operated a brewery and very popular beer garden on that same Bolivar Street hill. I tell its story on pages 9-12 (brewery and residence, with map) and pages 27-28 (Franz beer garden) of my book Breweries & Saloons in Jefferson City, Missouri (2009). Most of the information came from the German -language newspapers of Jefferson City, which are mostly unread by and therefore unknown to local historians. When the Franz brewery went out of business around 1893, the Moerschel brothers, looking to open a brewery in Jefferson City, bought the square -block Franz operation in January 1895, intending to enlarge it. However, when the much larger C&L Brewery (Conrad and Lorenz Wagner) on Dunklin Street became available (a second time) in February 1895, the Moerschel brothers bought it, improved and enlarged it, and made it into the Jefferson City's great Capitol Brewery that they operated until after WWII. To the Moerschels, the defunct Bolivar Street Franz Brewery and beer garden was a white elephant, no longer of interest. In 1901 they gave the brewery and property to Jefferson City with the stipulation that the land be used for a hospital. Indeed St. Marys Hospital was built on the site by Catholic funds and opened within a few years, in 1905. Thus, one could say that St. Marys Hospital was built on "beer land" and the land donation for a hospital was made possible by "beer money." The Franz brewery was partially built of stone and stone walls held up the hillside beer garden. I wonder if, as was customary, those hand-hewn building stones might have been recycled and used somewhere in the construction of St. Marys Hospital? In those days such construction material would never have been discarded! Did the stones for construction of St. Marys come from the quarry on the property, at the east base of the hill along present Missouri Boulevard, where the hospital's power plant is located? In 1905, the large amount of stones necessary to build the hospital would have had to come from somewhere very close; stones are too heavy to transport by wagon very far. I have a colorized postcard (printed in Germany) mailed in 1911 of the hospital. It is the same as the black -and -white postcard image, p. 55, in Arnold G. Parks Jefferson City (Arcadia Publishing, Postcard History Series, 2010). I also have a postcard ca. 1940s, by Kropp of Milwaukee. I believe these views of the hospital are well known. Though I am not a resident of Jefferson City, I have a deep and longstanding interest in its history and historical preservation. Walter A. Schroeder 2705 Isherwood Dr., Columbia, MO 65201; 573-474-2072 Johnston, Sheri From: Stratman, Anne Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 9:43 AM To: Johnston, Sheri Cc: Abbott, Jayme Subject: FW: Old Hospital -----Original Message ----- From: Carol Poteat [mailto:cpoteat2@icloud.comj Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 5:38 AM To: Stratman, Anne Subject: Old Hospital I support your efforts to raze the Building and repurpose the materials for construction of a another facility. Your efforts are admirable. Johnston, Sheri From: Stratman, Anne Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 9:43 AM To: Johnston, Sheri Cc: Abbott, Jayme Subject: FW: Old St. Mary's Hospital From: Mary Ann Hall[mailto:mahallartCo)embargmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 10:40 AM To: Stratman, Anne Subject: Old St. Mary's Hospital We think it is a good compromise reusing the old stone and simulating the look and outline of the original building. Good job, Farmer's Group. Stuart and Mary Ann Murphy Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Date: June 12, 2018 Demolition Clearance Application – 100 St. Mary’s Medical Plaza Motion: Eligible to Vote Aye Nay Abstain Commissioner Present Absent Bill Case Donna Deetz Art Hernandez Alan Wheat Steven Hoffman, Vice Chair Jane Moore Nathan Percy Douglas Record Mary Shantz, Chair Tie Votes: Chair Votes I certify the foregoing is a correct record of the Commissioners’ presence and votes. ________________________________ ___________________________ Mary Schantz Attest Chairperson Sheri Johnston FHC May 16, 2018 Ms. Jayme Abbot Neighborhood Services Manager 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Historic Preservation Commission - Redevelopment of the former St. Mary's Hospital Dear Jayme: Thank you for your team's consideration of our redevelopment plan for the former St. Mary's Hospital campus in Jefferson City, MO. Our team has worked for more than two years to arrive at the point to be able to request the permits necessary to improve the property. We have done our best to incorporate the feedback we have received. We are proud of the coordination that has taken place between our team and the elected leaders of Jefferson City and Cole County, Jefferson City and Cole County staff, as well as the many people we have appreciated getting to speak with who live in and around the Jefferson City area. Our goal from the beginning has been to redevelop this property at the front door of our community into a lifestyle destination that represents the proud history of the former St. Mary's Hospital while simultaneously serving as a beacon to tell the world that Jefferson City is a community worthy of investment. Our team is comprised of many great people: architects, historic consultants, civil engineers, structural engineers, construction managers, financial analysts and legal experts. All these skills were necessary to form our plan, they became vital when faced with two specific challenges. Our first challenge was SHPO's (State Historic Preservation Office) denial of our application to add the 1905 portion of the hospital building to the state historic registry. SHPO's denial eliminated the opportunity for us to qualify for much-needed federal historic tax credits to assist with the expensive cost of redeveloping and preserving a 100+ year old structure. The second challenge came in the form of multiple reports from structural engineers outlining great concern with the structural integrity and performance of the 1905 portion of the hospital when it is redeveloped. Despite the challenging news we refused to give up on doing our best to preserve the history of the property. We are incurring significant additional cost to preserve the building as shown in Exhibit A; as we feel it is the best possible way to preserve the historic significance of the former St. Mary's Hospital. To complete our plan, we will remove the existing stone portion of the building, clean the stones one at a time and palatize them. We will then build a new building in the same architectural style using the original stones from the current stone building. When we are finished the new building will look as clean and fresh as it did when it was originally completed over 100 years ago. This plan combines modern building techniques with the original architectural style and stone to allow the stone portion of the former St. Mary's Hospital to survive for generations to come. In addition to those who have already been named in this letter we would like to thank the Historic City of Jefferson, Jefferson City Historic Preservation Commission as well as many other preservation minded individuals that live in our community for their time and consideration. We have spent many hours with these individuals and groups on creative ways to work together to make sure that the history of the former St Mary's Hospital is never forgotten. Our family is proud to be part of the Jefferson City community, we look forward to working together for many years to come to make Jefferson City the best it can bel Rob Kingsbury Farmer Holding Company Jefferson City, MO FARMER HOLDING COMPANY EXHIBIT A FARMER HOLDING COMPANY City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty St Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 tci)lanning@ieffcitymo.org www. ieffersoncitvmo.gov APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION REVIEW/CLEARANCE TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION In accordance with Section 8-43 of the City Code 1. The undersigned hereby request(s) the following: ❑ Demolition Review (Application fee $53.00) — For properties that meet the following criteria: • Structure(s) age 50 —99 years old; or • Structure(s) listed on the National Register of Historic Places; or • Structure(s) designated as a Local Landmark. W"Demolition Clearance (Application fee $105.00) — For properties that meet the following criteria: • Structure(s) age 100+ years old; or • Structure located within local historic district. 2. The application is fi A. Street address: B. Age of structure: +/- 30-100+ years MO C. Number of structures to be demolished: Partial demolition of main building D. Historic name of structure (if any): (former) St. Mary's Hospital E. Historical use: Hospital F. Most recent use: Hospital 3. Digital photos are required to be submitted electronically as part of the application. Photos must have been taken within the last 90 days of all exterior sides, interior rooms and stairwells. Photographs must show all areas and characteristics of the structure, not just those areas in disrepair. If multiple structures or addresses, the photos must be labeled to distinguish between structures. / Photos submitted via W(USB Drive ❑CD ❑Email (icolanning@ieffcitvmo.org) ❑Other 4. Are there architectural features and/or historic fixtures worthy of preservation? Lyes 121"No If so, please explain any plans to preserve such features/fixtures: sHPo (state Historic Preservation Orme) views this building as NOT eligible for the state historic registry. We (the owner/developer) are doing all that we can to preserve the historic significance of the property. We will remove,ctean and reuse the original stone on a new building constructed in the same architectural style as the original hospital. Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Review Criteria: Response to Review Criteria as identified in 8-43 F of the Code. Check any that applies to the real estate: 1. To the best of your knowledge, is the structure a notable structure with respect to historic value by reason of: a. Its association with event(s) that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history or architectural heritage of the city, county, state or nation. eyes &No b. Its association with the life or lives of a person(s) significant in the history of the city, county, state or nation. (`(Yes &(No c. Its embodiment of distinctive characteristics of a type, design, period or method of construction. &,yes Ao d. esen> the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectural value. Ws M No e. Exeempiifiiee the cultural, political, economic, social or historic heritage of the city. L7 Yes L�f No f. Contains elements of design, detail material or craftsmanship which represent a significant construction innovation. &Yes i?No g. It is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area that was or should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on a historic or architectural motif. Uryes t7 No h. It ij an es ablished and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or of the entire community. LYJYes No I. It has yielded, or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information. ❑ Yes LINO W uNw.0L,:^f 2. To the best of your knowledge, is the structure a notable structure with respect to its demolition being detrimental to: a. The visual or spatial relationships to designated landmarks, National Register Sites, or the streetscape of a local historic district or National Register District. W"Yes &No b. The architectural, cultural, historic or contextual character of property designated as a local historic landmark, local historic district, or building or area listed on the National Register of Historic Places. &Yes L7 No 3. If answering "Yes" to Question 1 and/or 2 above, provide statement addressing why the property cannot be rehabilitated or restored with reasonable economical return. Attach additional pages if necessary. SHPO's (State Historic Preservation Office) has shared that they do not find the hospital to qualify for the historic registry. Our (ownerldeveloper) redevelopment plan does all that we can to preserve the historic significance of the property. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that I am the owner of the named property, or that the requested Demolition Review/Clearance is authorized by the owner of record and I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his/her agent. Signature:Date:5.15.2018 Phone: 573.635.2255 Printed Name: Rob Kingsbury Email: rkingsbury@farmercompanies.com _ Please check: ❑ Property Owner ❑ Authorized Agent 0 Licensed Contractor Other $yecoO6/Q- STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION – CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI June 12, 2018 NATURE OF REQUEST The purpose of the request is to demolish a residential structure located at 100 St Mary’s Medical Plaza (old St Mary’s Hospital). The original structure was constructed in 1905, therefore the age of the original structure is over 100 years old. In accordance with Section 8-47(A)(1)(a) the property was posted with a public hearing sign on May 30, 2018. Exterior and interior photos, MIDMOGIS Map, and other documentation are attached. STAFF ANALYSIS Section 8-43(F)(1) Notable Structure With Respect To Historic Value YES NO Its association with an event or events that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history or architectural heritage of the city, county, state or nation; X 100 St Mary’s Medical Plaza has significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history and county as it was the first hospital built in Jefferson City. Its association with the life or lives of a person or persons Significant in the history of the city, county, state or nation; X 100 St Mary’s Medical Plaza has been associated with persons significant in the history of the city and county as it was the first hospital built in Jefferson City. Its embodiment of distinctive characteristics of a type, design, period or method of construction X An architectural survey has been privately completed for this property. It represents the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectural value; X The original hospital was constructed by Henry Wallau, a local builder who constructed many other important buildings in Jefferson City. It exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social or historic heritage of the city X 100 St Mary’s Medical Plaza does exemplify the social and historic heritage of the city in that it was the first hospital built in the city. It contains elements of design, detail, material or craftsmanship which represent a significant construction innovation; X The original hospital was constructed by Henry Wallau, a prolific local builder. The stone used to build St Mary’s came from the city’s quarry. It is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area that was or should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on a historic or architectural motif; X It is an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or of the entire community; X The original St. Mary’s has stood for over 100 years and is among one of the more familiar visual features of the city due to both its prominent location and its important function. It has yielded, or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information. X This property has not at this point yielded significant archeological artifacts or information. Section 8-43(F)(2) Notable Structure with respect to its demolition being detrimental to: The visual or spatial relationship of the structure to designated landmarks, national register sites, or the streetscape of a local historic district or national register district; X 100 St Mary’s Medical Plaza (original building) is a designated local landmark. It has though, no visual or spatial relationship with a National Register site or district. The architectural, cultural, historic or contextual character of property designated as a local historic landmark, local historic district, or building or area listed on the National Register of Historic Places. X 100 St Mary’s Medical Plaza due to its important function within Jefferson City for so many years is connected to the historic character of the city and is a local landmark, but the structure is not detrimental to any building or area listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Section 8-43(F)(3) If found Notable Structure following shall be considered: The state of deterioration, disrepair or structural unsoundness of the structure, and the practicability of rehabilitation. The historic preservation commission may request the applicant to submit documentation or other information necessary to determine whether the property can be rehabilitated or restored with a reasonable economic return to the owner. X 100 St Mary’s Medical Plaza was denied by the State Historic Preservation office for inclusion to the National Historic Register thereby eliminating funding in the form of federal historic tax credits. In addition, there are concerns about the structural integrity of the 1905 portion of the hospital in terms of redevelopment. Demolition Application Page 2 Historic Preservation Commission Whether the property is located within an area identified for redevelopment within the adopted comprehensive plan, and the nature of the intended redevelopment. X Plans to redevelop the site have been proposed. The nature of the surrounding area and the compatibility of the structure to existing adjacent structures and land uses. X The number of similar structures that exist within the City of Jefferson. X Plans for the preservation or salvage of notable historic or architectural features and historic fixtures that contributed to the finding of a notable structure. X The existing stone portion of the original building will be removed and restored and used in the construction of the new building which will be built in the same architectural style. This will preserve the historical significance of the former St Mary’s Hospital. CONDITION THAT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OR CITY COUNCIL MAY IMPOSE In accordance to Section 8-43(I), The Commission or Council may impose conditions on the approval of a Historic Preservation Demolition Clearance in order to ensure that the demolition complies with any applicable requirements of this section that include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. To ensure that notable historic or architectural features or historic fixtures that contributed to the finding of a notable structure are being salvaged or preserved. 2. To ensure that a structure found to be a notable structure and approved for demolition clearance is properly documented for posterity. 3. To ensure that partial demolition of a structure found to be a notable structure does not result in establishment of an exterior finish that is out of character with the structure. 4. Other conditions that the Commission or City Council may deem appropriate to reduce the impact of the demolition with respect to the applicable review criteria. Conditions imposed by the Historic Preservation Commission may be appealed to the City Council in the manner provided for in Section 8-43(H) STAFF RECOMMENDATION In reviewing Section 8-43(F), Review Criteria (as outlined above), staff recommends this property to be demolished. FORM OF MOTION Motion that the demolition clearance application for 100 St Mary’s Medical Plaza is approved by this commission. Supporting Documentation Landmark Properties/National Register Sites/National Register Districts Map Demolition Application Page 3 Historic Preservation Commission Page 1 of 1Print Preview 5/31/2018http://www.midmogis.org/colesl/WebForms/Print.aspx?img=http://www.midmogis.org/arc... t :.:• s — �� �r .r� � '� .,__- - ��, °� �_:., � ,fir, _ � � ��p �e, �� �. s S? MARYS FIRST FLOOR PLAN S! MARYS HEALTH �Ma�.BMa<,�a�P�a,a_���e.�o��„�-Mo_gs,o, �. CENTER (CENTER St. Mary's Hospital, Area 1, Ground Floor St Mary's Hospital, Area 1, First Floor St Mary's Hospital, Area 1, First Floor St Mary's Hospital, Area 1, First Floor St Mary's Hospital, Area 1, Second Floor St Mary's Hospital, Area 1, Second Floor St Mary's Hospital, Area 1, Third Floor St Mary's Hospital, Area 1, Third Floor St. Mary's Hospital, Area 1, Fourth Floor St. Mary's Hospital, Area 1, Fourth Floor DEMOLITION CLEARANCE APPLICATION 100 ST. MARY’S MEDICAL PLAZA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 2018, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 320 E McCarty St Jefferson City, MO 65101 For more information visit www.jeffersoncitymo.gov Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Date: June 12, 2018 Demolition Clearance Application – 1732 Vieth Dr Motion: Eligible to Vote Aye Nay Abstain Commissioner Present Absent Bill Case Donna Deetz Art Hernandez Alan Wheat Steven Hoffman, Vice Chair Jane Moore Nathan Percy Douglas Record Mary Shantz, Chair Tie Votes: Chair Votes I certify the foregoing is a correct record of the Commissioners’ presence and votes. ________________________________ ___________________________ Mary Schantz Attest Chairperson Sheri Johnston City of Jefferson • Department of Planning & Protective Services 3 320 E. McCarty St Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 - ��� icclanning@ieffcitvmo.org ww w. i effe rso n c i tv m o. gov APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION REVIEW/CLEARANCE TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION In accordance with Section 8-43 of the City Code 1. The undersigned hereby request(s) the following: ❑ Demolition Review (Application fee $53.00) — For properties that meet the following criteria: Structure(s) age 50— 99 years old; or Structure(s) listed on the National Register of Historic Places: or Structure(s) designated as a Local Landmark. ❑O Demolition Clearance (Application fee $105.00) — For properties that meet the following criteria: • Structure(s) age 100+ years old; or • Structure located within local historic district. 2. The application is filed for the following described real estate: A. Street address: 1732 Veith Dr. B. Age of structure: 118 C. Number of structures to be demolished: D. Historic name of structure (if ai E. Historical use: Residential F. Most recent use: Residential 3. Digital photos are required to be submitted electronically as part of the application. Photos must have been taken within the last 90 days of all exterior sides, interior rooms and stairwells. Photographs must show all areas and characteristics of the structure, not just those areas in disrepair. If multiple structures or addresses, the photos must be labeled to distinguish between structures. Photos submitted via ❑USB Drive 63CD ❑Email (icolanning@ieffcitvmo.org) ❑Other 4. Are there architectural features and/or historic fixtures worthy of preservation? ❑ Yes 0 No If so, please explain any plans to preserve such features/fixtures: Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Review Criteria: Response to Review Criteria as identified in 8-43 F of the Code. Check any that applies to the real estate: 1. To the best of your knowledge, is the structure a notable structure with respect to historic value by reason of: a. Its association with event(s) that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history or architectural heritage of the city, county, state or nation. ❑ Yes LII No b. Its association with the life or lives of a person(s) significant in the history of the city, county, state or nation. ❑ Yes Id No c. Its embodiment of distinctive characteristics of a type, design, period or method of construction. ❑ Yes ® No d. Represents the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectural value. ❑ Yes ® No e. Exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social or historic heritage of the city. ❑ Yes ® No f. Contains elements of design, detail, material or craftsmanship which represent a significant construction innovation. ❑ Yes ® No g. It is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area that was or should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on a historic or architectural motif. ❑ Yes ® No h. It Is an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or of the entire community. ❑Yes m No i. It has yielded, or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information. ❑ Yes ® No 2. To the best of your knowledge, is the structure a notable structure with respect to its demolition being detrimental to: a. The visual or spatial relationships to designated landmarks, National Register Sites, or the streetscape of a local historic district or National Register District. ❑ Yes 0 No 3. b. The architectural, cultural, historic or contextual character of property designated as a local historic landmark, local historic district, or building or area listed on the National Register of Historic Places. ❑ Yes 0 No If answering "Yes" to Question 1 and/or 2 above, provide statement addressing why the property cannot be rehabilitated or restored with reasonable economical return. Attach additional pages if necessary. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that I am the owner of the named property, or that the requested Demolition Review/Clearance is authorized by the owner of record and I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his/her agent. Signature:_(d�c Date:5/7/18 Phone: 573-634-3455 Printed Name: Paul Samson, PE Email: psamson@cmps-inc.com Please check: ❑ Property Owner © Authorized Agent ❑ Licensed Contractor ❑ Other STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION – CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI June 12, 2018 NATURE OF REQUEST The purpose of the request is to demolish a residential structure located at 1732 Vieth Dr. According to MidMOGIS the property was constructed in approximately 1900, therefore the age of the structure is over 100 years old. In accordance with Section 8-47(A)(1)(a) the property was posted with a public hearing sign on May 30, 2018. Exterior and interior photos, MIDMOGIS Map, and other documentation are attached. STAFF ANALYSIS Section 8-43(F)(1) Notable Structure With Respect To Historic Value YES NO Its association with an event or events that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history or architectural heritage of the city, county, state or nation; X The property is not individually listed on the National Register, local landmark or a part of a local historic district. Its association with the life or lives of a person or persons Significant in the history of the city, county, state or nation; X While each individual that has occupied this property has in some small way added to the fabric of Jefferson City history, they had no significant influence/association with the history of the city, county, state, or nation. Its embodiment of distinctive characteristics of a type, design, period or method of construction X An intensive level survey has not been completed for this property. It represents the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectural value; X The architect for this property is unknown. It exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social or historic heritage of the city X It contains elements of design, detail, material or craftsmanship which represent a significant construction innovation; X This house is a simple 11/2 story gable front folk house. It is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area that was or should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on a historic or architectural motif; X It is an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or of the entire community; X This property, while it has stood for over 100 years, could not be called a familiar visual feature singularly. It has yielded, or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information. X This property has not at this point yielded significant archeological artifacts or information. Section 8-43(F)(2) Notable Structure with respect to its demolition being detrimental to: The visual or spatial relationship of the structure to designated landmarks, national register sites, or the streetscape of a local historic district or national register district; X This property is not near a designated landmark, national register site, or local/national historic district. The architectural, cultural, historic or contextual character of property designated as a local historic landmark, local historic district, or building or area listed on the National Register of Historic Places. X This property is not near a designated landmark, national register site, or local/national historic district. Section 8-43(F)(3) If found Notable Structure following shall be considered: The state of deterioration, disrepair or structural unsoundness of the structure, and the practicability of rehabilitation. The historic preservation commission may request the applicant to submit documentation or other information necessary to determine whether the property can be rehabilitated or restored with a reasonable economic return to the owner. X Whether the property is located within an area identified for redevelopment within the adopted comprehensive plan, and the nature of the intended redevelopment. X The demolition of this structure will make way for a skilled nursing facility and a preschool in accordance with an approved Plan Unit Development (PUD). The nature of the surrounding area and the compatibility of the structure to existing adjacent structures and land uses. X This is an older home embedded within an area of more recent construction. Demolition Application Page 2 Historic Preservation Commission The number of similar structures that exist within the City of Jefferson. X This property is one of many properties of the same architectural style located in Jefferson City. Plans for the preservation or salvage of notable historic or architectural features and historic fixtures that contributed to the finding of a notable structure. X CONDITION THAT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OR CITY COUNCIL MAY IMPOSE In accordance to Section 8-43(I), The Commission or Council may impose conditions on the approval of a Historic Preservation Demolition Clearance in order to ensure that the demolition complies with any applicable requirements of this section that include, but are not limited to, the following: 1.To ensure that notable historic or architectural features or historic fixtures that contributed to the finding of a notable structure are being salvaged or preserved. 2. To ensure that a structure found to be a notable structure and approved for demolition clearance is properly documented for posterity. 3.To ensure that partial demolition of a structure found to be a notable structure does not result in establishment of an exterior finish that is out of character with the structure. 4.Other conditions that the Commission or City Council may deem appropriate to reduce the impact of the demolition with respect to the applicable review criteria. Conditions imposed by the Historic Preservation Commission may be appealed to the City Council in the manner provided for in Section 8-43(H) STAFF RECOMMENDATION In reviewing Section 8-43(F), Review Criteria (as outlined above), 1732 Vieth Dr does not appear to hold significant historic value. Staff recommends the property to be demolished. FORM OF MOTION Motion that the demolition clearance application for 1732 Vieth Dr is approved by this commission. Supporting Documentation Landmark Properties/National Register Sites/National Register Districts Map Demolition Application Page 3 Historic Preservation Commission Page 1 of 1Print Preview 5/9/2018http://www.midmogis.org/colesl/WebForms/Print.aspx?img=http://www.midmogis.org/arcg... 1 7 3 2 V i e t h D r . 1 7 3 2 V i e t h D r . 1 7 3 2 V i e t h D r . 1 7 3 2 V i e t h D r . 1 7 3 2 V i e t h D r . 1 7 3 2 V i e t h D r . 1 7 3 2 V i e t h D r . DEMOLITION CLEARANCE APPLICATION 1732 VIETH DRIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 2018, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 320 E McCarty St Jefferson City, MO 65101 For more information visit www.jeffersoncitymo.gov Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Date: June 12, 2018 Demolition Review Application – 1736 Vieth Dr Motion: Eligible to Vote Aye Nay Abstain Commissioner Present Absent Bill Case Donna Deetz Art Hernandez Alan Wheat Steven Hoffman, Vice Chair Jane Moore Nathan Percy Douglas Record Mary Shantz, Chair Tie Votes: Chair Votes I certify the foregoing is a correct record of the Commissioners’ presence and votes. ________________________________ ___________________________ Mary Schantz Attest Chairperson Sheri Johnston City of Jefferson • Department of Planning & Protective Services a 320 E. McCarty St Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 icola n n i ng@ ieffcitvmo.org www jeffersoncitymo.gov APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION REVIEW/CLEARANCE TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION In accordance with Section B-43 of the City Code 1. The undersigned hereby request(s) the following: © Demolition Review (Application fee $53.00) — For properties that meet the following criteria: • Structure(s) age 50 — 99 years old; or • Structure(s) listed on the National Register of Historic Places: or • Structure(s) designated as a Local Landmark. ❑ Demolition Clearance (Application fee $105.00) — For properties that meet the following criteria: • Structure(s) age 100+ years old; or • Structure located within local historic district. 2. The application is filed for the following described real estate: A. Street address: 1736 Veilh Dr. B. Age of structure: 79 C. Number of structures to be demolished: D. Historic name of structure (if E. Historical use: Residential F. Most recent use: Residential 3. Digital photos are required to be submitted electronically as part of the application. Photos must have been taken within the last 90 days of all exterior sides, interior rooms and stairwells. Photographs must show all areas and characteristics of the structure, not just those areas in disrepair. If multiple structures or addresses, the photos must be labeled to distinguish between structures. Photos submitted via DUSB Drive mCD ❑Email (icplanning@ieffcitvmo.org) ❑Other 4. Are there architectural features and/or historic fixtures worthy of preservation? ❑ Yes m No If so, please explain any plans to preserve such features/fixtures: Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Review Criteria: Response to Review Criteria as identified in 8-43 F of the Code. Check any that applies to the real estate: 1. To the best of your knowledge, is the structure a notable structure with respect to historic value by reason of: a. Its association with event(s) that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history or architectural heritage of the city, county, state or nation. ❑ Yes 0 No b. Its association with the life or lives of a person(s) significant in the history of the city, county, state or nation. ❑ Yes m No c. Its embodiment of distinctive characteristics of a type, design, period or method of construction. ❑ Yes ® No d. Represents the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectural value. ❑ Yes ® No e. Exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social or historic heritage of the city. ❑ Yes ® No f. Contains elements of design, detail, material or craftsmanship which represent a significant construction innovation. ❑ Yes ® No g. It is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area that was or should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on a historic or architectural motif. ❑ Yes ® No h. It is an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or of the entire community. ❑Yes 0 No i. It has yielded, or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information. ❑ Yes ® No 2. To the best of your knowledge, is the structure a notable structure with respect to its demolition being detrimental to: a. The visual or spatial relationships to designated landmarks, National Register Sites, or the streetscape of a local historic district or National Register District. ❑ Yes ® No 3. b. The architectural, cultural, historic or contextual character of property designated as a local historic landmark, local historic district, or building or area listed on the National Register of Historic Places. ❑ Yes m No If answering "Yes" to Question 1 and/or 2 above, provide statement addressing why the property cannot be rehabilitated or restored with reasonable economical return. Attach additional pages if necessary. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that I am the owner of the named property, or that the requested Demolition Review/Clearance is authorized by the owner of record and I have been authorized by the owner to make this appli on his/her agent. Signatur Date: 517/18 Phone: 573-634-3455 Printed Name: Paul Samson, PE Email: psamson@cmps-inc.com Please check: ❑ Property Owner © Authorized Agent ❑ Licensed Contractor ❑ Other STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION – CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI June 12, 2018 Demolition Application. Application filed by Paul Sampson for demolition of a residential structure located at 1736 Vieth Dr. NATURE OF REQUEST The purpose of the request is to demolish a residential structure located at 1736 Vieth Dr. According to MidMOGIS the structure located at 1736 Vieth Dr was constructed in 1939. STAFF ANALYSIS Historic Preservation Review Yes No Comments Property listed on the National Register? X Property awarded Landmark Designation? X Is the property character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the community, county, state or nation? X The property is not individually listed on the National Register, local landmark or local historic district. Is the property location a site of a significant local, county, state or national event? X No known significant events have transpired on the properties. Is the property identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the community, county, state or nation? X Is the property embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style valuable for the study of a period, type, method of construction or use of indigenous materials? X Reconnaissance or intensive level of survey has not been completed for this area of town. Is the property identification as a work of a master builder, designer, architect, or landscape architect whose individual work has influenced the development of the community, county, state or nation? X Information on designer or architect is unknown. Is the property embodiment of elements of design, detailing, materials, or craftsmanship that render it architecturally significant? X Is the property unique location or singular physical characteristics that make it an established or familiar visual feature? X Is the property character as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure, including, but not limited to, farmhouses, gas stations, or other commercial structures, with a high level of integrity or architectural significance? X No STAFF RECOMMENDATION In reviewing Section 8-44 C, Criteria for Nomination (as outlined above), the structure does not appear to hold any historical significance in terms of heritage, cultural or architecturally. A skilled nursing facility and a preschool will be constructed in accordance with an approved Plan Unit Development (PUD). FORM OF MOTION Motion that there will be “no historic properties affected” by the demolition and the permit is recommended for approval by this commission. This property is not an established or familiar visual feature for the city Demolition Application Page 3 Historic Preservation Commission Page 1 of 1Print Preview 5/9/2018http://www.midmogis.org/colesl/WebForms/Print.aspx?img=http://www.midmogis.org/arcg... 1736 Vieth Dr. 1736 Vieth Dr. 1736 Vieth Dr. 1736 Vieth Dr. 1736 Vieth Dr. City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Assessment Section 106 Review Contact Person/Address: Federal Agency Project: The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed the information submitted on the above referenced project. Based on this review, we have made the following determination: After review of initial submission, the project area has low potential for the occurrence of cultural resources. Adequate documentation has been provided. There will be “no historic properties affected” by the current project and is approved by this commission Property is designated a landmark by the City of Jefferson and/or listed within the National Register Listing. There will be an “adverse effect” by the current project and is not approved by this commission. Property is designated a landmark and/or listed within the National Register Listing. There will be a “no adverse effect” by the current project is approved by this commission. If you have any questions, please write City of Jefferson, Planning and Protective Services, Attn: Sheri Johnston, Neighborhood Services Specialist, 320 E McCarty St, Jefferson City, MO, 65101, Sjohnston@jeffcitymo.org or call 573-634-6564. By: _________________________________________________ Date:___________________ Historic Preservation Commission Representative Community Development Block Grant - Entitlement Sheri Johnston City Hall, 320 E McCarty St Jefferson City, MO 65101 Replacement of the shingle roof, replacement of the fascia and soffit, and replacement of gutters at 420 Case Ave. Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. City of Jefferson_ Carrie Tergin, Mayor Department of Planning & Protective Services Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director 320 E. McCarty Street Phone: 573-634-6410 Jefferson City, MO 65101 Fax: 573-634-6457 June 6, 2018 Missouri State Historic Preservation Office Attention: Review and Compliance P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Re: Roof replacement at 420 Case Ave., Jefferson City, MO 65101, CDBG Entitlement Dear Compliance Officer: Enclosed please find a request for review pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. Per your requirements, we have included the following information: • Section 106 Project Information Form • Topographic and/or city map that clearly marks the project area & defines the area of potential effects • Photographs of the project area that are not photocopied, are at least 3 x 5 inches, and clearly show the primary façade of the buildings and streetscape showing buildings along the project corridor. For your convenience, these have been provided in color. • Additional documentation (e.g. scope of work, bid, construction plans, site plans) to describe in detail the undertaking Check one of the following: The property is not listed in the National Register of Historic Places and does not appear to meet National Register criteria of eligibility. Therefore, we have determined that no historic properties will be affected by this undertaking. We request your concurrence. OR The property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places. We have applied the criteria of adverse effect and find that the proposed undertaking will have:  no adverse effect  an adverse effect on historic properties. We request your concurrence. I am aware the SHPO has 30 days upon receipt of adequate information to review and comment on the impact of this undertaking. I am also aware that if the initial Section 106 submission is not sufficient and additional information is requested, a second 30-day review will begin upon SHPO’s receipt of the additional information. Please contact me at (573) 634-6564 or Sjohnston@jeffcitymo.org if you have comments or questions. Sincerely, Sheri Johnston Neighborhood Services Specialist Enclosures MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE SECTION 106 PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Submission of a completed Project Information Form with adequate information and attachments constitutes a request for review pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended). We reserve the right to request more information. Please refer to the CHECKLIST on Page 2 to ensure that all basic information relevant to the project has been included. For further information, refer to our website at: http://www.dnr.state.mo.us/shpo and follow the links to Section 106 Review. NOTE: Section 106 regulations provide for a 30-day response time by the Missouri State Historic Preservation Office from the date of receipt. PROJECT NAME Homeowner Support Program FEDERAL AGENCY PROVIDING FUNDS, LICENSE, OR PERMIT HUD Community Development Block Grant (Entitlement) APPLICANT City of Jefferson TELEPHONE 573-634-6410 CONTACT PERSON Sheri Johnston, Neighborhood Services Specialist TELEPHONE 573-634-6564 ADDRESS FOR RESPONSE City of Jefferson Attn: Sheri Johnston 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 LOCATION OF PROJECT COUNTY: COLE_____________________________________________________________________________ STREET ADDRESS: 420 Case Ave. CITY: Jefferson City__ GIVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA (TOWNSHIP, RANGE, SECTION, ¼ SECTION, ETC.) *USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP QUADRANGLE NAME Jefferson City Quadrangle______________________________________________ YEAR: 1981 TOWNSHIP: 44 RANGE: 11 SECTION: 18 *SEE MAP REQUIREMENTS ON PAGE 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Describe the overall project in detail. If it involves excavation, indicate how wide, how deep, etc. If the project involves demolition of existing buildings, make that clear. If the project involves rehabilitation, describe the proposed work in detail. Use additional pages if necessary. The City of Jefferson may assist the homeowner at 420 Case Ave, Jefferson City, Cole County, MO 65101, with replacement of the shingle roof, fascia and soffit, and replacement of gutters. MO 780 1027 (09-02) ARCHAEOLOGY (Earthmoving Activities) Has the ground involved been graded, built on, borrowed, or otherwise disturbed? Yes • Please describe in detail: (Use additional pages, if necessary.) Photographs are helpful. Project area consists of existing residential property Will the project require fill material? Yes No • Indicate proposed borrow areas (source of fill material) on topographic map. Are you aware of archaeological sites on or adjacent to project area? Yes No • If yes, identify them on the topographic map. STRUCTURES (Rehabilitation, Demolition, Additions to, or Construction near existing structures) To the best of your knowledge, is the structure located in any of the following? An Area Previously Surveyed for Historic Properties A National Register District A Local Historic District If yes, please provide the name of the survey or district: Constructed in 1960 • Please provide photographs of all structures, see photography requirements. • NOTE: All photographs should be labeled and keyed to one map of the project area. • Please provide a brief history of the building(s), including construction dates and building uses. (Use additional pages, if necessary.) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS Map Requirements: Attach a copy of the relevant portion (8½ x 11) of the current USGS 7.5 min. topographic map and, if necessary, a large scale project map. Please do not send an individual map with each structure or site. While an original map is preferable, a good copy is acceptable. USGS 7.5 min. topographic maps may be ordered from Geological Survey and Resource Assessment Division, Department of Natural Resources, 111 Fairground, Rolla, MO 65402, Tel: 573/368-2125, or printed from the website http://www. topozone.com. Photography Requirements: Clear black and white or color photographs (minimum 3" x 5") are acceptable. Polariods, photocopies, emailed, or faxed photographs are not acceptable. Good quality photographs are important for expeditious project review. Photographs of neighboring or nearby buildings are also helpful. All photographs should be labeled and keyed to one map of the project area. CHECKLIST: Did you provide the following information? Topographic map 7.5 min. (per project, not structure) Other supporting documents (If necessary to explain the project) Thorough description (all projects) For new construction, rehabilitations, etc., attach work write-ups, plans, drawings, etc. Photographs (all structures) Is topographic map identified by quadrangle and year? Return this Form and Attachments to: MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Attn: Section 106 Review P.O. BOX 176 JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI 65102 MO 780-027 (09-02) X X X X X X Page 1 of 1Print Preview 5/1/2018http://www.midmogis.org/colesl/WebForms/Print.aspx?img=http://www.midmogis.org/arcg... 420 Case Avenue, Jefferson City, MO, USA US Canada Search for more maps GPS Coordinate of Mouse: 38.5848899, -92.217168 | Change Format Print from your computer: Landscape | Portrait Link to this map: Browse and view FREE US Geological Survey, US Forest Service, and NRCan topo maps for the US and Canada. About Us Partner Program Contact Us Privacy Policy Return Policy MyTopo One South Broadway Billings, MT 59101 © 2017 MyTopo, A Trimble Company support@mytopo.com 877.587.9004 406.294.9411 undefined Page 1 of 1MyTopo Free Online Topo Maps 6/5/2018http://www.mytopo.com/maps/index.cfm Looking down Case Ave Northwest towards Monroe. Looking down Case Ave Southeast towards Jackson St. Looking down Case Ave Northwest towards Monroe. Looking down Case Ave Southeast towards Jackson St. House directly across from 420 Case Ave House to the right of 420 Case Ave House directly across from 420 Case Ave House to the left of 420 Case Ave Front view of 420 Case Ave from street Left side view of the front porch roof of 420 Case Ave Left side view of 420 Case Ave Right side view of the front porch roof of 420 Case Ave Right side view from the rear of 420 Case Ave. Back porch of 420 Case Ave Rear of 420 Case Ave from back right corner. Left side of the back porch of 420 Case Ave Left side view of 420 Case Ave looking to the rear Left side view of the roof of 420 Case Ave Left side view of the roof of 420 Case Ave looking to the rear Left side view of 420 Case Ave looking to the rear Rev. 11/07/2017 745 ARTICLE XXI. FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE. Sec. 7-720. Committee established; membership. A.There shall be a Façade Improvement Committee composed of seven (7) registered voters of the City. B.Members shall be qualified for appointment by having an interest or expertise and being familiar with the subject of architecture, historic preservation, and/or city beautification. C.Seven members shall be appointed by the Mayor with the advice and consent of the Council. Two of those members shall be appointed from the Historic Preservation Commission. D.Members shall be appointed for two (2) year terms. Any vacancies shall be filled by appointment and approval in like manner for the unexpired portion of the term. All members shall continue to serve until their successors have been appointed and qualified. E.Members shall receive no compensation for their service on the committee, but may receive reimbursement for authorized expenses, upon approval of the City Administrator. (Ord. No. 15367, §1, 2-2-2015) Sec. 7-721. Meetings, quorum. The Façade Improvement Committee shall hold a regular business meeting at least once each year at such time and place as shall be established by rule of the committee. The committee may hold such additional meetings as it shall, from time to time, deem necessary. A quorum for the conducting of business at such meetings shall be a majority of the duly appointed members of the committee. Sec. 7-722. Officers. The Board shall elect, at its first meeting in each fiscal year, and from its citizen members, a chairman and vice chairman. Such officers shall be eligible to succeed themselves at the will of the committee. Sec. 7-723. Powers and duties generally. The Board shall have such powers as are designated in Chapter 17 Article XV of the City Code or elsewhere in the Code. Rev. 06/07/2016 746 Sec. 7-724. Report. The Board shall make reports and recommendations to the City Council on an as needed basis. Sec 7-725. Finances. The Board is not authorized to make any purchases or spend any money on behalf of the City. Sec. 7-726. Staff, city cooperation. The Committee may request and shall receive the cooperation of City officials and City employees to the extent reasonably possible in providing it assistance for the furtherance of its duties. Secs. 7-727 to Sec. 7-739. Reserved. (Ord. No. 15071, §2, 1-11-2013) Neighborhood Reinvestment Act In 4007, City Councfi created an Ad Mac Committee on Revitalization of Old Town. The Ad Hoc Committee was charged with Investigating ways that the Clry of efferson might foster Investment and revitalization From Me merhtied mod les and recommendation of the Ad Hoc Commltlee was Me creation of programs and incentives (mown as the Neighborhood Reinvestment Ad Each of the Neighborhood Reinvestment Act anagrams are designed to promote watching owner occulted investment, spur commercial development and removal of slum and Night Currently there are five city funded programs that benefit Old Town and the recently added East Side Olshrct Funds are Forced, subject to annual Council appopnafon and are available fimHome fiM-serves! basis. Reinvestment Incentive Mea Boundary Map Contact Us Open Monday through Friday 893 am -5: B3 an Phone (573) 6346090 Fax (573) 634 M57 Email JCPlanning@jgMio o0rg OCrown Payment Incentive ORestlential Tax Reimhursement OCmmmercol Facade Improvement Incentive OAdaptive Reuse Incentive ORental Facade Improvement 1 Abbott, Jayme From:Mary Schantz <schantzm@embarqmail.com> Sent:Saturday, May 26, 2018 12:18 PM To:Abbott, Jayme; 'Art Hernandez' Subject:RE: name Thanks Jayme. Can you send this to the entire Commission? Thanks, Mary Mary Schantz From: Abbott, Jayme [mailto:JAbbott@jeffcitymo.org] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 4:54 PM To: 'Mary Schantz'; 'Art Hernandez' Subject: RE: name Mary & Art,   The City has been trying to get clarifications on the 50% rule from several State and Federal departments.  Those  include:  State Historic Preservation Office, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, State of Missouri Department of Economic Development (grantor of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program funder of 408 Lafayette St). Paul Mohr, Region VII Environmental Officer, provided HUD’s interpretation includes the following: “This responds to  the city’s question regarding a provision in HUD’s 24 CFR Part 55 floodplain management regulation that allows historic  properties to sidestep the “8‐Step” process that implements the doctrine of avoiding assisting properties in the  floodplain. The relevant provision is the “substantial improvement” definition at §55.2(b)(10(ii) that defines historic  property as: “Any alteration of a structure listed on the National Register of Historical Places or on a State Inventory of  Historic Places.”  I understand the City has before it a proposal for listing the subject property in its local historic register. Unfortunately,  local listing of the property likely does not meet this definition.   The definition of historic structure in Part 55 was meant to generally mirror the definition that FEMA uses for NFIP  floodplain management purposes. That definition distinguishes local registers from state registers, and only includes  local registers that are “certified” by the SHPO or the Secretary of the Interior. That “certification” is an official process  that most states do not use.    Here’s FEMA’s definition of “historic structure” from 44 CFR Part 59 that implements the NFIP:   “…any structure that is:  (1)Listed individually in the National Register of Historic Places (a listing maintained by the Department of Interior) or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as meeting the requirements for individual listing on the National Register; (This includes structures that are determined to be eligible for listing by the Secretary of the Interior as a historic structure. A determination of “eligibility” is a decision by the Department of the Interior that a district, site, 2 building, structure or object meets the National Register criteria for evaluation although the property is not formally  listed in the National Register.)  (2)Certified or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as contributing to the historical significance of a registered historic district or a district preliminarily determined by the Secretary to qualify as a registered historic district; (3)Individually listed on a state inventory of historic places in states with historic preservation programs which have been approved by the Secretary of the Interior; or (4)Individually listed on a local inventory of historic places in communities with historic preservation programs that have been certified either: (a)By an approved state program as determined by the Secretary of the Interior or (b)Directly by the Secretary of the Interior in States without approved programs.” However, it’s possible the City’s local register has been “certified” by the SHPO or the Secretary of the Interior, in which  case the City and/or the Missouri SHPO should know this.”  Contact with SHPO about whether or not the City’s status as a Certified Local Government meets FEMA’s definition of  local registers has not been exactly clear in their responses.  As I suspect this may be referring to Certified Local Districts  which in Missouri is only located in Kansas City and St. Louis.   A legal opinion will be requested from DNR’s Council  which may take several weeks. FEMA/SEMA won’t provide info, but only refer to their regulations.  Sincerely,   Jayme Abbott Neighborhood Services Manager  573‐634‐6305  From: Mary Schantz [mailto:schantzm@embarqmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 7:23 AM To: Abbott, Jayme; 'Art Hernandez' Subject: name Art and Jayme, I think at the meeting Art asked for the name of the person that the city was dealing with to get clarity on the issue about the 50% rule and the impact of a historic district. Am I incorrect? Did you get the name Art and if so, will you share it? thanks, M Mary Schantz