HomeMy Public PortalAbout07-20-93 Local Planning Agency Meeting.tifMINUTES
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY MEETING
VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE, FLORIDA
TUESDAY, JULY 20, 1993
COUNCIL CHAMBER
85 WEST MCINTYRE STREET, SECOND FLOOR
1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS: The meeting was called to
order by Chairman Sime at 7:20 p.m. Present were Members Clifford
Brody, Rafael Conte, Mortimer Fried, Michael Hill (arrived at
8:30 p.m.), Raymond Sullivan (arrived at 7:25 p.m.), and Chairman
Betty Sime. Vice Chairman Joe Rasco was absent. Also present were
Village Manager Sam Kissinger, Village Clerk Guido Inguanzo, Village
Attorney Steve Helfman, and Community Development Director Robin
Sobrino.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Chairman Sime led the Pledge.
3. AGENDA: The minutes of the special meeting of June 24, 1993,
the special meeting of June 30, 1993 and the special meeting of July
8, 1993, were approved, as submitted, by unanimous consent.
4. DISCUSSION OF TRAFFIC CIRCULATION: Robert Swarthout, the
Village's Master Plan Consultant, made a brief presentation. Mr.
Swarthout recommended a level of service "E" for arterial roads.
Mr. Swarthout also introduced John Zegeer, a traffic consultant, who
addressed the board.
Members Brody and Fried spoke in support of adopting a level of
service "E" in lieu of a lower level of service that would require
extensive capital improvement projects for Crandon Boulevard.
Member Fried made a motion to adopt policy 1.1.1 of the Traffic
Circulation goals and objectives. The motion was seconded by Member
Conte and adopted by a unanimous voice vote. The vote was as
follows: Members Brody, Conte, Fried, Sullivan, and Chairman Sime
voting Yes.
Jeffrey Bercow, 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, representing
Key Biscayne Hotel and Villas, Carter McDowell, 100 Southeast 2
Street, Miami, representing Sheraton Royal Biscayne, and Eric Nesse,
750 Ocean Drive, representing Key Biscayne Hotel and Villas,
addressed the board regarding the potential re -opening of Ocean
Drive through the Development of Regional Impact (D.R.I.)
properties.
Page 1 of 4
July 20, 1993
Member Sullivan made a motion adopting the "Future Traffic
Circulation Plan -- including the future designation for re -opening
Ocean Drive" as presented by the master plan consultant. The motion
was seconded by Member Fried.
Member Brody discussed an alternate location for a future Ocean
Drive. There was extensive discussion regarding the issue of re-
opening Ocean Drive.
The Sullivan motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. The vote
was as follows: Members Brody, Conte, Fried, Hill, Sullivan, and
Chairman Sime voting Yes.
Member Brody discussed policy 1.5.1 regarding bicycle and pedestrian
traffic on West Wood Drive. The board also discussed the current
bus routes on West Wood Drive.
The following residents participated in discussions with the board
regarding traffic circulation: Bill Ofgant, 512 Fernwood Road;
Servando Parapar, 240 Cypress Drive; Martha Broucek, 170 Ocean Lane
Drive; Nancy Dove, 170 Ocean Lane Drive; Guy Smith, 701 Fernwood
Road; and Sidney Cooper, 170 Ocean Lane Drive.
5. FUTURE LAND USE MAP: Chairman Sime opened the floor for
comments from the public regarding the Future Land Use Map
designations.
Jeff Becker, 210 Seaview Drive, discussed the proposed designation
of the L'Esplanade property. Michael Kahn, 881 Ocean Drive, also
discussed the high density residential designation of the
L'Esplanade property. Shirley Brill, 550 Ocean Drive, further
discussed the L'Esplanade property. The board also discussed a
letter addressed to the L.P.A. from Camille Guething of 210 Seaview
Drive. Community Development Director Sabrina discussed the current
zoning of the L'Esplanade property.
After extensive discussion, Member Sullivan made a motion to re-
designate the L'Esplanade property as medium density multi -family.
The motion was seconded by Member Hill and failed by a 3 - 3 roll
call vote. The vote was as follows: Members Conte, Sullivan and
Chairman Sime voting Yes. Members Fried, Hill and Brody voted No.
Guy Smith discussed the designation of the residential side of the
"Wooley's" parcel and recommended a townhouse or office/residential
use for the property.
After further discussion, Member Hill made a motion to re -designate
the "Wooley's" parcel as two family residential. The motion was
Page 2 o f 4
July 20, 1993
seconded by Member Fried and adopted by a unanimous voice vote. The
vote was as follows: Members Brody, Conte, Fried, Hill, Sullivan,
and Chairman Sime voting Yes.
Jean Yailey, 398 Harbor Drive, discussed the designation of her
property on the map which notes provisions requiring a public open
space element. Member Brody made a motion to delete a notation in
the July 20, 1993 Future Land Use map designating specific property
on Harbor Drive for public open space. The motion was seconded by
Member Sullivan and adopted by a unanimous voice vote. The vote was
as follows: Members Brody, Conte, Fried, Hill, Sullivan, and
Chairman Sime voting Yes.
Carter McDowell discussed the issue of beach access. It was the
consensus of the board to include only one beach access point in the
plan. Guy Smith further addressed the board.
Pauline Rivelli, 550 Ocean Drive, representing the Chamber of
Commerce, addressed the board regarding the proposed hotel sites.
Chairman Sime discussed the covenant offered by representatives of
the Key Biscayne Hotel and Villas D.R.I. property at the June 30th
meeting regarding designations on said property. Jeffrey Bercow and
Eric Nesse addressed the board.
Member Sullivan made a motion to reconsider the board's action
regarding the Bercow covenant offered at the June 30th meeting. The
motion was seconded by Member Hill and adopted by a unanimous voice
vote. The vote was as follows: Members Brody, Conte, Fried, Hill,
Sullivan, and Chairman Sime voting Yes.
Gene Stearns, 180 Cape Florida Drive, addressed the board on the
issue.
After extensive discussion, Member Hill made a motion that the
"Future Traffic Circulation Plan" not indicate a specific location
for Ocean Drive -- only a policy desire for the re -opening of the
road. The motion was seconded by Member Fried and adopted by a
unanimous voice vote. The vote was as follows: Members Brody,
Conte, Fried, Hill, Sullivan, and Chairman Sime voting Yes.
Member Fried made a motion to designate the Key Biscayne Hotel and
Villas D.R.I. property as follows: East of the proposed Ocean Drive
at 30 units per acre and west of the proposed Ocean Drive at 16
units per acre. The motion was seconded by Member Brody.
Conchita Suarez, 201 Crandon Boulevard, addressed the board.
Page 3 of 4
July 20, 1993
The Fried motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. The vote
was as follows: Members Brody, Conte, Fried, Hill, Sullivan, and
Chairman Sime voting Yes.
Bob Matheson, 700 Colorado Avenue, Stuart, discussed the designation
of the parcel at One Crandon Boulevard.
6. D.R.I. DEVELOPMENT ORDERS: Chairman Sime discussed the lack of
local park land and its effects on the D.R.I. properties. The
chairman requested that the attorney review the possibility of a
building moratorium on the D.R.I. 's until the issue can be resolved.
Attorney Helfman explained the issue and stated that he will further
review the matter to determine what remedies are available to the
Village.
Members Sullivan and Brody stressed the importance of this issue.
Member Hill cautioned the board that such an action could halt all
development in the Village.
Gene Stearns, Jeffrey Bercow and Bill Ofgant discussed the issue
with the board.
7. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: This item was deferred until the next
meeting of the board.
8. ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Sime announced the L.P.A. will meet on
August 17, 1993, at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was adjourned at
11:55 p.m.
Approved this 1-144\ day of r' -k -A -,c
2
t4,,z________
Village C erk Chairman
, 1993
IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY TD LOCAL
PLANNING AGENCY WITH RESPECT TO ANY MA'11.aR CONSIDERED AT A CTING
OR DARING, THAT PERSON WILL .NIZED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND,
FOR SUCH PURPOSE, MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
Page 4 of 4