HomeMy Public PortalAboutOrd. 1363ORDINANCE NO. 1353
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL
ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING SECTION 25.32.1.5
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
The City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby find,
resolve and determine as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 25, Section 25-32 of the Lynwood
Municipal Code is hereby amended bw adding Section 25-32.1.5 to
the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance. The proposed amendment shall read
as follows:
25-32.1.5 Commercial Development Plans
Intent. These regulations are designed to ..permit the
flexibility that will encourage more creative design,
placement of buildings, improvement of vehicular
circulation, off-street parking facilities utilization of
the site as characterized by special or unusual features of
geography, topography, size, shape and to mitigate all
potentially incompatible activities. Principle uses are
therefore, restricted to uses which conform to the character
of the district.
criteria for approval.
i. No commercial, industrial or residential construction in the
City's Redevelopment Area, shall occur until the development
proposal has been reviewed by the Project Review Board for
conceptual approval and by the City's Planning Commission
for conditional use aermit processing. The Protect Review
Board shall also review proposals from a land use
perspective and may deny a proposal in order to insure the
protection o! the character and area o! each district.
2. Th• Project Review Board shall resvlew the development
proposal as it relates to architectural design, materials
used for construction as wall as commercial and
manufacturing development themes.
3. A conditional use permit for the development proposal must
be approved by the City Planning Commission.
4. The development proposal must b® in conformance with the
General Plan and Zoning Coda.
5. The development proposal must be adequate in size and shape
to accommodate fences, walls, parking, loading areas,
landscaping, open spaces and other facilities necessary to
make the proposal compatible with the abutting land uses.
Tho dnynl ont rrn~ ~$1 3.--v ~'s..c .r.~••~..~~- - <-••,
Qpm._.._ tom.. i. Lt a <.-.- .-. .y.... a.c- cw~.@o6 vv S
public street or highway, designed to carry the volume and
quantity of tralfic movements generated by the proposal.
di f kE9: or0 i nnK~
7. The development proposal must not have adverse or
detrimental effects on the surrounding or abutting
properties. Should the proposed development show an impact
on existing public facilities, ie. water, sewer, sidewalks,
streets, flood control lines and gutters, etc., the
applicant shall be required to deposit with or pay the city
the amount necessary to provide the required public
facilities to serve the development.
8. Procedure for submittal and completeness of the application
shall be consistent with Section 25-25 of the City's Zoning
Ordinance.
Section 2. SEVERABILITY. It any section, subsection
subdivision, clause, phrase, or portion o! this ordinance, or the
application thereof, to any person or place, is for any reason
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or it's
application to other persons or places.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted
this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective oP the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences,
clauses, phrases, or portions, or the application thereo! to any
person or place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
First read at regular meeting o! the City Council of said City
held on the 2nd day of duly 1991,
and finally adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the
6th
day of
August 1991 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS HEINE, REA, RICHARDS, WELLS, HENNING
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
Robe=~~c~rt~ H~ in a or
~ Y
ATTEST:
L~~~1-e%cicr-e~~ C/~ + R~~
Andrea L. Hooper, Ci y
APPROVED.-A CONTENT:
~, -..__
Kenric Karefa-Johnson, Director
Community Development Department
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~,F~ , ~ ~~ .~-
Hen S. Bari o'sa
General Counsel
disk09:ordinsnte
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COW TY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, ahe undersigned, City Clerk of the City of
Lynwood, and ex-officio clerk of the Council of said City,
do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy
of Ordinance No. 1363 adopted by the City Council of the
City of Lynwood, and that the same was passed on the date
and by the vote therein stated.
DATED this 7th day of August 19 91
~`' ¢~
ity er
City of Lynwood
RESOLUTION NO. 2387
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL NOT
ADOPT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
did, pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on a proposed
amendment to the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance with respect to the
above subject; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has faund no
substantial environmental impact that will result from the
proposed ordinance amendment and a Nogative Declaration has been
Piled in the Community Development Department and is on file. at
the office of the City Clerk,
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The proposed ordinance amendment will not be consistent
with the objectives and development policies of the
City of Lynwood.
B. The proposed ordinance amendment puts additional strain
on staff.
C. That the City Council and City Planning Commission
should discuss the matter at the proposed retreat with
the City Council.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,'
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
recommends that the City Cou.^.cil .^.ot adopt t::e gropose3
amendment.
RECOMMENDED this 14th day of May 14, 1991, by the members of
Planning Coffi3lssion voting as follows:
AYES: Commissioners Muhsin, Pryor, Willis, Dove
Haynes, Dixon
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner McMiller
ABSTAIN: Commissioners Dove, Muhsin
APPROVED TO CONTENT:
.°'~ - ~~
-ick Karefa-Johnson, Director
Community Development Dept.
disk90:reso2387
John R. Haynes, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~'
~?///
uq as Barnes
General Counsel
1