Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2018-06-14 packetNotice of Meeting & Tentative Agenda IF / k t�� •f�1 W 3 M S City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, June 14, 2018 — 5:15 P.M. City Council Chambers, John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street Enter through Main Lobby AH interested parties will be given a chance to he heard. TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Introductions 2. Procedural Matters • Determination of quorum and designation of voting alternates • Call for cases • Receive and review requests for continuance • Receive requests for reordering the agenda • Format of hearing • List of exhibits 3. Adoption of Agenda (as printed or reordered) 4. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of May 10, 2018 5. Communications Received 6. New Business/Public Hearings Case No. P18014 —Creation of the School Street Local Historic District. Request filed by Jenny Smith, lead applicant, and 21 other property owners within the proposed district for the following: 1. Creation and designation of the School Street Local Historic District for an area containing 28 property parcels and consisting of approximately 4 acres. 2. Enactment of design guidelines for properties within the district, including regulations requiring review and approval of new buildings and building modifications by the Historic Preservation Commission. The proposed historic district is generally located south of East McCarty Street, east of Wears Creek, North of Highway 50/63, and on Lafayette Street frontage. Maps of the proposed historic district area and proposed design guidelines are available on the Planning and Zoning Commission website at: www.jeffersoncitymo.gov and are on file at the Department of Planning and Protective Services and available for review during regular business hours. 7. Other New Business Case No. P18015 — 1050 South Country Club Drive, Final Subdivision Plat of Turtle Creek Subdivision, Section Two. Request filed by Lage LLC, property owner, for a Final Subdivision Plat of 13.64 acres consisting of 34 lots. The property is zoned RS -2 Single Family Residential and is located on the west side of South Country Club Drive 350 feet north of Old Lohman Road and is described as part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8 and part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, Jefferson City, Missouri (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). 8. Other Business A. Staff updates on prior cases 9. Adjourn Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. MINUTES JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 10, 2018 5:15 p.m. COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT Bunnie Trickey Cotten Jack Deeken Bob George* Chris Jordan, Chairman Michael Lester David Nunn Dale Vaughan Chris Yarnell, Vice Chairman Michelle Mahoney, Alternate *Arrived Late COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT Dean Dutoi Matthew Hall, Alternate Blake Markus, Alternate COUNCIL LIAISON PRESENT Carlos Graham, Council Liaison ATTENDANCE RECORD 8of9 8 of 9 7 of 9 9 of 9 8of9 6of9 8of9 6 of 9 6 of 9 3of9 3of9 5of9 STAFF PRESENT Sonny Sanders, Director of Planning & Protective Services Bryan Wolford, Associate City Counselor Eric Barron, Planning Manager David Bange, City Engineer Shane Wade, Civil Engineer II Ian Zollinger, Planner Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant 1. Call to Order and Introduction of Members, Ex -officio Members and Staff The Chairman, six regular members and one alternate was present. A quorum was present. Designation of Voting Alternates The Chairman announced that all regular members and Alternate Michelle Mahoney are eligible to vote. 2. Procedural Matters and Procedures Explained Mr. Zollinger explained the procedures for the meeting. The following documents were entered as exhibits. Mr. Zollinger advised that copies of the exhibits are available through the City Clerk or the Department of Planning and Protective Services: The City Code of the City of Jefferson, as amended Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map Copies of applications under consideration A list of property owners to whom notices were sent Affidavit of publication of the public notice in the newspaper Rules of Procedure, Planning & Zoning Commission Mr. Zollinger submitted the following items for the record: Staff reports Minutes of proceedings Copies of drawings, plans, and/or renderings under consideration Letters or memoranda from staff Materials submitted by the public or applicants pertaining to the cases under consideration Minutes/Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission May 10, 2018 Page 2 3. Adoption of Agenda Ms. Cotten moved and Mr. Yarnell seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Cotten, Deeken, Lester, Mahoney, Nunn, Vaughan, Yarnell 4. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 12, 2018 Ms. Cotten moved and Mr. Nunn seconded to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 12, 2018 as written. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Cotten, Deeken, Lester, Mahoney, Nunn, Vaughan, Yarnell 5. Communications Received Correspondence was received for Case No. P18010 and Case No P18011. 6. New Business/Public Hearings Mr. Zollinger explained that on January 2, 2018 the City Council amended Chapter 35, Zoning establishing short term rentals of a residence or lodging as a permitted use in the commercial and mixed use districts and as a special exception use in the residential and industrial districts. Mr. Zollinger explained some of the requirements that short term rental uses would be subject to. Case No. P18008 - 1001 West High Street, Special Exception Permit. Request filed by Mike and Lisa Yungbluth, owners, for a Special Exception Permit to operate a Short Term Rental. The property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Brooks Street and West High Street. The property is described as the Northeasterly part of Lot No. 1, in Block No. 8, of Crandall's Addition (also known as Lower Jefferson Addition), City of Jefferson, Missouri. Mr. Zollinger described the proposal and explained that the property is zoned RA -2 High Density Residential and the current use is a triplex apartment building. He stated that applicants are requesting to use two units of the existing three unit building as Short Term Rental units with the possibility of utilizing the third unit in the future. Mr. Zollinger explained that the third unit is currently occupied by a tenant. He stated that the applicant would like the option to have all three units available for short term rentals. Mr. George arrived at 5:40 p.m. Mr. Jordan announced that Mr. George is not eligible to vote on this case. He is eligible to vote on the remaining cases. Mr. Mike Yungbluth, 2107 Scenic Drive, spoke regarding this request and explained that he would like to have all three units available for Short Term Rental. He stated that he would like the flexibility of long and short term rental as market conditions dictate. Mr. Yungbluth explained that the top unit is currently occupied by a long term tenant. No one spoke in opposition to this request and no correspondence was received. Mr. Zollinger gave the Planning Division staff report. Mr. Nunn moved and Mr. Vaughan seconded to recommend approval of the request for a Special Exception Permit for a Short Term Rental to the City Council. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Cotten, Deeken, Lester, Mahoney, Nunn, Vaughan, Yarnell Case No. P18009 - 1632 Tanner Bridge Road, Special Exception Permit. Request filed by Mary Creed and Joseph McFerron, owners, for a Special Exception Permit to operate a Short Term Rental. The property is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Tanner Bridge Road and Flora Drive. The property is described as Lot.56, Southwood Hills Addition, City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. Mr. Zollinger described the proposal and explained that the property is zoned RS -2 Single Family Residential and is currently used as a single family residence. He stated that the applicants are requesting a special exception permit for the Short Term rental of a Lodging Room. Mr. Zollinger Minutes/Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission May 10, 2018 Page 3 explained that the City Code states that a maximum of one rental space may be rented to guests. He stated that the applicants have a living room area and one bedroom set aside as the rental space that is offered to guests. Mr. Zollinger explained that the applicants have stated in their narrative that because of the layout of the rental space, only three guests would be allowed at one time which is allowed in the City Code. He stated that the applicants have considered purchasing a "Guest Parking" sign that would be attached to a wooden wall near the garage and would not exceed the 1 sf allowance for Short Term Rentals and would not be lighted. Ms. Missy Creed, 1632 Tanner Bridge Road, spoke regarding this request and explained that they are applying for a Special Exception permit to continue hosting guests. She stated that they stay at Air BnB's when they travel. Ms. Creed explained that Air BnB's are review based and that before anyone stays in their home she checks reviews from previous hosts. She stated that since Air BnB's are heavily review based guests do not want bad reviews and are generally on their best behavior. Dr. Linda Landon, 1811 Forest Park Court, spoke in favor of this request and explained that Ms. Creed sought advice from experienced Air BnB renters before she started her own Air Bnb. She stated that Ms. Creed recently started JeffCityBlog.com to attract tourists to Jefferson City. No one spoke in opposition to this request and no correspondence was received. Mr. Zollinger gave the Planning Division staff report. Ms. Cotten moved and Mr. Lester seconded to recommend approval of the request for a Special Exception Permit for a Short Term Rental to the City Council. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes: Aye: Cotten, Deeken, George, Lester, Mahoney, Nunn, Vaughan, Yarnell Case No. P18010 - 412 Cherry Street, Special Exception Permit. Request filed by Gerardo and Staci Cornejo, owners, for a Special Exception Permit to operate a Short Term Rental. The property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Cherry Street and E Handley Way. The property is described as Part of Inlot No. 644, City of Jefferson, Missouri. Mr. Zollinger described the proposal and explained that the property is zoned RA -2 High Density Residential and is currently used as a single family residence. He stated that in their narrative the Applicant stated that their max adult capacity is advertised as six. Mr. Zollinger explained that the City Code only allows for five unrelated persons or any number of persons related by blood, marriage or adoption shall be permitted as lodging guests. Mr. Gerardo Cornejo, owner of 412 Cherry Street, and resides at 3822 Viola View, spoke regarding this request. He explained that they are requesting a Special Exception permit to allow a minimum of six guests. Mr. Cornejo stated that they average approximately 10 to 15 stays per month. He explained that they offer two bedrooms and a pullout couch in a newly renovated house. Mr. Cornejo stated that they had one bad experience where a new member joined Air Bnb in February 2018, had no reviews and had not stayed at an Air Bnb before. He explained that the rules they had posted were ignored and the renter caused a huge disruption. He explained that because of that experience they only accept members listed on Air Bnb. Mr. Cornejo stated that he concurs with the City Code maximum of five unrelated guests. No one spoke in opposition of this request. Correspondence was received the following individuals: Bill Meyer, 724 E. McCarty Street Jane Beetem, 1612 Payne Drive Mr. Zollinger gave the Planning Division staff report. Minutes/Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission May 10, 2018 Page 4 Mr. Yarnell moved and Mr. Vaughan seconded to recommend approval of the request for a Special Exception Permit for a Short Term Rental with five unrelated guests to the City Council. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes: Aye: Cotten, Deeken, George, Lester, Mahoney, Nunn, Vaughan, Yarnell Case No. P18011 - 134 West Circle Drive, Special Exception Permit. Request filed by Brad and Julie Fitzmaurice, owners, for a Special Exception Permit to operate a Short Term Rental. The property is located 250 feet north of North Circle Drive and is described as Lot D of Linhardts Subdivision, City of Jefferson, Missouri. Mr. Zollinger described the proposal and explained that the property is zoned RS -3 Single Family Residential and is currently used as a single family residence. He stated that there are no plans to install signage on the property. Ms. Julie Fitzmaurice, owner of 134 W. Circle Drive, currently reside in Lees Summit, Missouri, spoke regarding this request and explained that they travel extensively and use Air BnB's. She stated that she sent letters to neighboring property owners inviting them to an open house. Ms. Fitzmaurice addressed concerns noted in correspondence received from Ms. Patricia Taggart. Ms. Fitzmaurice stated that the property has not been rented at this time. No one spoke in opposition to this request. Correspondence was received from Ms. Patricia Taggart, 136 Boonville Road. Mr. Zollinger gave the Planning Division staff report. Mr. Nunn moved and Ms. Cotten seconded to recommend approval of the request for a Special Exception Permit for a Short Term Rental to the City Council. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes: Aye: Cotten, Deeken, George, Lester, Mahoney, Nunn, Vaughan, Yarnell Case No. P18012 -1129 Cedar City Drive, Special Exception Permit. Request filed by Joshua Korte, owner, for a Special Exception Permit to operate an outdoor mulch production, sales and composting facility. The property is described as part of the South half of Section 9, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, City of Jefferson, Callaway County, Missouri. Mr. Zollinger described the proposal and explained that the property consists of 6.82 acres of property zoned as M-1 Light Industrial District. He stated that the applicant is planning on using the property for an outdoor mulch production sales and composting facility. Mr. Zollinger explained that the zoning code states that for a site with this type of use a Special Exception Permit is required. He stated that the applicant has requested the fence around the property be a particular type of fence for their security needs. Mr. Zollinger explained that the current use of the property is an auto repair shop and agricultural. He stated that signage and lighting must adhere to the allowances of the M-1 zoning district. Mr. Zollinger explained that staff recommends the parking lot and parking lot entrance to the site be paved according to City Code. He stated that the proposed use of the outdoor mulch production, sales and composting facility is consistent with the general use of the area. Mr. Joshua Korte, owner of 1129 Cedar City Drive and resides at12510 County Road 4031 Holts Summit, MO, spoke regarding this request and explained that the applicant is planning on constructing a 5,760 square foot agricultural building with two sides being open in order to store tractors, trailers and trucks under one roof. No one spoke in opposition to this request and no correspondence was received. Mr. Zollinger gave the Planning Division staff report. Mr. Wade addressed questions regarding the floodplain. Minutes/Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission May 10, 2018 Page 5 Mr. Lester moved and Mr. George seconded to recommend approval of the Special Exception Permit subject to technical edits subject and to corrections of the Planning and Engineering Divisions to the City Council. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes: Aye: Cotten, Deeken, George, Lester, Mahoney, Nunn, Vaughan, Yarnell 7. Other New Business Case No. P18013 — 2303 West Main Street, Appeal of Sidewalk Deferral Decision. Request filed by St. Joseph Cathedral School for an appeal of denial of sidewalk deferral. Sidewalk construction requirements amount to approximately 1050 feet of sidewalk along West Main Street, triggered by a planned expansion of the school building. The property is located on the south side of West Main Street at the intersection of Binder Drive. Mr. Barron explained that appeals are usually directed to the Board of Adjustment. He stated that in this case appeals for sidewalk deferral variances are heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Baron explained that all people giving testimony or comments shall be sworn in. The reason for this is that this case is an appeal, and appeals are handled differently than normal cases. If an applicant or other interested party disagrees with the decision, the only route they can pursue is through Circuit Court therefore testimony needs to be admissible in court. At this time, Chairman Jordan asked those wishing to speak on this case to please stand and be sworn in. Mr. Barron gave an overview of sidewalk construction requirements and options to request a deferral. He stated that the current ordinance dealing with the sidewalk construction requirement was established in 2008 and a Sidewalk Plan was adopted the following year. Mr. Barron explained that sidewalk construction is triggered by building additions, parking lot additions and new subdivision plats and requirements are limited to 5% of the construction costs of the project. He stated that a process was established, where deferrals could be granted for specific situations, which is not a variance for sidewalk construction but a delay in construction, where sidewalks would be constructed by the property owner at a future date. Mr. Barron explained that a 4,000 square foot addition to the school's gymnasium triggered the requirement for sidewalk construction. He stated that the project cost is approximately $1.75 million. He stated that the property frontage including the school and the Cathedral is 1,035 square feet. Mr. Barron explained that the property owner filed a request for sidewalk deferral based on four criteria. He stated that the Director reviewed the request and determined that the situation did not meet the criteria, and denied the deferral with responses to each of the criteria citied in the application. Mr. Barron explained that the appeal request is based on one of the criteria, that the sidewalk construction would create an unusual hardship. He stated that Staffs position is that the deferral request was properly denied and that the situation is not unique among similarly situated properties and in fact ranks high in terms of need for sidewalks, being located in front of a church and school, in a residential area, near a park, and with another school located a short distance away. Mr. Barron explained that sidewalks exist on the south side of West Main Street from West Elementary to Forrest Hill Avenue. He stated that the issue before the Commission is an appeal as to whether the decision or interpretation by the Director was in accordance with the intent and requirements of the Ordinance. Mr. Barron explained that the three actions available to the Commission are to Affirm, Reverse, or Remand the decision. He stated that an action to Reverse or Remand must state the rationale .for the decision. Ms. Cotten left the room at 7:08 p.m. Chairman Jordan called for a recess. The meeting reconvened at 7:18 p.m. Mr. Spencer Allen, 912 Martin Way, Principal of St. Joseph Cathedral School, spoke regarding this request and distributed a handout regarding the sidewalk deferral appeal. He explained that St. Joseph Cathedral School is currently constructing a gymnasium expansion to provide additional practice space to keep students from having late night practices as well as to increase access to fine arts offerings. He stated that the primary concern is safety for the students. Mr. Allen agrees that this is the type of street that needs a sidewalk. He stated that there is a fully complete sidewalk and crosswalk across the street. He stated that their argument is not sidewalks to nowhere, or cost, Minutes/Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission May 10, 2018 Page 6 consistently our main argument has been safety, the same argument the City has. Mr. Allen explained that this is one of the most dangerous places for students to cross as there are no connecting sidewalks on the south side of the street in the area of St. Joseph Cathedral. He stated that the nearest sidewalk ends just east of Forest Hill Avenue. Mr. Allen explained that from the end of this sidewalk to the St. Joseph Cathedral property, the area where a sidewalk would be constructed, is currently a steep hill from the back of the curb to existing yards which sit up higher than the street. He stated that during arrival 230 cars crossed our main entrance and during the same time period, only 30 turned onto Binder Drive. Mr. Allen explained that if sidewalks are constructed along the south side of West Main Street this would make it inviting for students to hop on the sidewalk without messing with the crosswalk and then end up in an area where there is no safe and controlled crossing point. He stated that the property owner would not be opposed to sidewalks on the south side of West Main Street if they connected with other sidewalks and feel that a public project could be needed in the future to make this happen. Mr. Jeff Wilson, 2020 Saddlebrooke Lake Road, spoke regarding this request. Mr. Wilson is with Sircal Contracting, the general contractor for the addition to St. Joseph Cathedral School. Mr. Wilson explained that constructing a sidewalk on the south side of West Main Street would require extensive redesign and regrading of all drive entrances on West Main Street. He stated that the estimated project cost is $125,000 to $175,000 which includes engineering costs. Mr. Wilson explained that the construction of this sidewalk would be a completely separate project from the school addition as it is on the other side of the building. He stated that there are no other construction activities in conjunction with this addition. Mr. Wilson explained that he is a parishioner of St. Joseph Cathedral and we need to be concerned with the safety of our kids and not construct a sidewalk that does not connect with any other sidewalks. Mr. Brian McMillian, Central Missouri Professional Services, 2500 E. McCarty Street, spoke regarding this request and explained that design of sidewalks would fall under this purview. He stated that the design would involve extensive survey work along the front of the property that is not included as part of the current school addition and would be an added cost for extra design work. Mr. McMillian explained that West Main Street was not built and designed to accommodate sidewalks. He stated that this project would require extensive redesign of driveways. Mr. McMillian explained that during the Mid -1980's it was decided not to build sidewalks along the south side of West Main Street. Mr. Andrew Lenart, 114 Boonville Road, spoke in favor of this request. No one spoke in opposition to this request and no correspondence was received. Mr. Barron explained that staff has nothing else to add as part of their closing statement. Mr. Spencer Allen, in his closing argument, stated that the City has not shown how this sidewalk that won't be totally completed and is going to lead the kids to a not visible middle of the block abrupt end forcing students to cross a section of roadway that in a period of 20 minutes 269 cars go through at that time. He explained that it a hardship has been created when the City has not addressed the safety issues. Mr. Jeff Wilson, stated that as a citizen of Jefferson City there are loopholes in our sidewalk code and this entire process. There are a lot of questions that cannot clearly be answered. As a citizen this needs to be addressed in the future. Mr. Deeken commented that we have dealt with sidewalk issues for years. This is going to truly be a sidewalk to nowhere. Mr. Nunn commented that based on the arguments made safety should be included as a general item on the deferral application. Mr. George commented that this is a sidewalk to nowhere. Minutes/Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission May 10, 2018 Page 7 Mr. Jordan explained that the motion should be made to affirm, reverse or remand the decision. Mr. Yarnell moved and Mr. Nunn seconded to reverse the Director's decision and accept the deferral. The motion passed 8-0 with the following roll call vote: Aye: Cotten, Deeken, George, Lester, Mahoney, Nunn, Vaughan, Yarnell 8. Other Business A. Presentation of Plaques for outgoing members Bob George and David Nunn • Chairman Jordan presented a plaque to Bob George for his service from 2000 to 2018. • Chairman Jordan presented a plaque to David Nunn for his service from 1989 to 2018. B. Staff updates on prior cases • Final Subdivision Plat of Cliffside Estates • Rezoning of 994 Diamond Ridge from C -O to C-1 9. Adjourn. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:28 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Eric Barron, Assistant Secretary Jefferson City Planning &Zoning Commission June 14, 2018 Case No. P18014 Creation of the School Street Local Historic District Table of Contents Case No. P18014 School Street Local Historic District Page Staff Report — P&Z Commission 1 Location and Vicinity Maps 5 Staff Report — Historic Preservation Commission 7 Excerpt of Unapproved Minutes, May 1, 2018 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting 10 Application Materials Application Form 13 Application Signatures 14 Application Narrative 36 Map & Photos of Houses 65 Design Guidelines 71 Property Owner Letters and Mailing Lists 80 Correspondence 88 Letter from Old Town Revitalization Company PLANNING STAFF REPORT JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 14, 2418 Case No. P18014 —Creation of the School Street Local Historic District. Request filed by Jenny Smith, lead applicant, and 21 other property owners within the proposed district for the following: 1. Creation and designation of the School Street Local Historic District for an area containing 28 property parcels and consisting of approximately 4 acres. 2. Enactment of design guidelines for properties within the district, including regulations requiring review and approval of new buildings and building modifications by the Historic Preservation Commission. The proposed historic district is generally located south of East McCarty Street, east of Wears Creek, North of Highway 50163, and on Lafayette Street frontage. Maps of the proposed historic district area and proposed design guidelines are available on the Planning and Zoning Commission website at: www.jeffersoncitymo.gov and are on file at the Department of Planning and Protective Services and available for review during regular business hours. NATURE OF REQUEST The purpose of the request is to form a local historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 of the City Code. The application materials include responses to the criteria for formation of a local historic district as outlined in City Code. Proposed design guidelines for future construction and renovations within the district were submitted with the application. The application was signed by 22 of the 28 property owners within the proposed district, which meets the 75% property owner signatory requirement for application for a local historic district. PUBLIC NOTICE AND INFORMATIONAL MEETING Notice of public hearing has been mailed to all property owners of record within the proposed district and to property owners located within 185 feet of the proposed district. Public notification signs were placed within the proposed district. A public informational meeting for property owners within the area was held on April 19. The information meeting focused on the details of the proposal, application process, and resulting regulatory requirements. REVIEW BY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION This proposal was presented to the Historic Preservation Commission on May 1. The Historic Preservation Commission voted to approve the proposal, and their recommendation for approval will be forwarded to the City Council. PROCEDURE FOR PROCESSING LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT APPLICATION The primary purpose for formation of Local Historic Districts (as outlined in the city code of the City of Jefferson) is to serve as justification for enactment of building design regulations. The state statutory allowances for such regulations are heavily rooted in zoning powers granted to cities by the State. After review by the Historic Preservation Commission, the proposal is being forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review and recommendation prior to being sent to the City Council for consideration. PRIMARY ITEMS OF REVIEW BY P&Z COMMISSION 1. Formation of the District — Specifically use of the district as a land use planning tool and the boundaries of the district. (ie, the "rezoning" of the area to Historic District). 2. Review of Design Guidelines — Review and recommendation regarding the specifics of the design guidelines. 1 Case P 14008 — School Street Local Historic District Page 2 TYPES OF DISTRICTS PERMITTED BY CITY CODE The primary purpose of local historic designation is to serve as justification for and establish design requirements for the associated district. The process for establishment of local historic districts was put in place in 1998 within Chapter 8 of the City Code (Building Regulations) as part of a tiered structure of tools available for implementation of design requirements in historic areas. The three tiered system that was put in place in 1998 was as follows: 1. Neighborhood Conservation Advisory District — Advisory requirements only. 2. Neighborhood Conservation Planned District — Objective process, with design requirements established. 3. Historic District — Subjective process involving design review board (the Historic Preservation Commission). In 2006, the regulations for Neighborhood Conservation districts were rewritten and moved to the Zoning Code, and the allowance for formation of an advisory district was removed altogether. Section 8-40 of the City Code provides guidance for evaluating proposals for districts on a sliding scale, with most careful scrutiny given to applications for historic districts in comparison to the conservation districts. DESIGN GUIDELINES The primary purpose of formation of a local historic district is to regulate the building design in the interest of preserving historical character, and formation of a local historic district necessities adoption of design criteria regulating future construction and building modifications. The application includes proposed design guidelines, which are a subjective set of criteria that would be used by the Historic Preservation Commission when reviewing future building permit applications for the area. If approved, any future exterior building proposals or modifications in the area would be subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. Please see the design guidelines document. Staff have attempted to summarize the design guidelines as follows: I . Building Modifications — encouragement of rehabilitation over replacement of exterior features, with replacement features, materials, windows, roof forms, etc. needing to be compatible with existing features in the area. Building additions to the side or rear. 2. New Buildings — Similar in scale and character to existing buildings. Setbacks along existing build lines and no garage doors facing street 3. Site Features — Limited front yard paving. Landscaping features consistent with area. CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES/RELATION TO FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS Substantial improvement floodplain regulations prohibit improvements of greater than 50% of the value of a structure that is located within a floodplain and below the regulated elevation for the community (which is 1' above base flood elevation). Federal floodplain regulations provide for an exemption from the 50% substantial improvement regulation for contributing historic structures within a certified district. It is not clear to city staff whether the formation of a local historic district would result in relief from the substantial improvement floodplain regulations for the structures within that district nor is it clear to city staff as to the mechanics of how that determination would be made. Repeated attempts to obtain clarity on this topic from state and federal regulators have not provided a clear understanding or definitive answer. EXISTING CITY CODE The existing city code language pertaining to formation of a local historic district is heavily tied to applications for building permits, rather than a "Certificate of Appropriateness" process as is most common for historic districts in other communities. Recent amendments associated with adoption of the 2015 Building Code have resulted in removal of requirements for building permits for modifications on the exterior envelope of a building, which is out of sync with the purpose of establishing design requirements for a local historic district. City Staff believe that, if the district is approved, an amendment to the city code would be necessary to provide clarity on how proposals for exterior modifications would be processed. Other areas of potential amendment include formation of an appeal process and providing for representation of the district on the zoning map. 2 Case P 14008 — School Street Local Historic District Page 3 STAFF ANALYSIS Staff have broken the analysis of the application into a number of individual components as follows. The analysis focuses on the primary items for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A separate analysis was provided to the Historic Preservation, which focused on the findings of historic significance: 1. The purpose of the application is heavily rooted in an attempt to obtain relief from Federal floodplain regulations, specifically the substantial improvement clause. - Staff have no information that formation of the district would actually result in relief from those Federal regulations. - Staff would recommend a high level of scrutiny on proposals to receive relief from federal regulations based on actions undertaken at the local level. In this case, the City is responsible for administering floodplain regulations at the local level, and the City's floodplain management program is regularity audited by federal and state regulators. Permits for development in the floodplain that are issued improperly at the local level have the ability to affect access to the National Floodplain Insurance Program for the community as a whole. - There are other ways for the structures in the area to obtain more flexibility from floodplain regulations, for example, by elevating the existing structures to a level above the base flood elevation. 2. Designation of flood prone areas as open space within urban comprehensive planning documents is common, and the bulk of the proposed School Street Historic District is recommended as open space within the land use plan component of the adopted Central Eastside Neighborhood Plan. The area will always be at an economic disadvantage because of its location within area designated as floodplain. Even if floodplain regulations regarding substantial improvement are relaxed through historic designation, floodplain insurance requirements are not likely to be affected by such designation. While it is important to maintain properties within the floodplain, staff do not recommend actions that would encourage investment in flood prone areas unless that investment is undertaken in a manner that protects personal safety and protects financial investment. 3. If approved, the School Street area would have the highest historic designation available at the local level, a designation that exists nowhere else within the City. Section 3-40 of the City Code requires that most careful scrutiny be given to proposals for Local Historic Districts in comparison to the other types of designation available (the conservation overlay district). 4. The administrative burden of future construction proposals within the area, both on the property owners and on the City, would be high. Future building proposals would go before the Historic Preservation Commission (acting as a design review board) for review of architectural details. The existing building design and architectural character of the area is not of sufficient complexity to justify such an intensive review process. If the desire were to provide for regulation of building design, to ensure building modifications are in character with the area, designation of an overlay district would be a more appropriate tool in this instance, where review of building proposals for conformance with design requirements would be conducted at the city staff level. 5. The boundaries of the district are formed primarily around the portion of the neighborhood located within the floodplain. If there is a desire to enact design regulations, a larger district may be more appropriate. 6. The proposed design guidelines are fairly standard, and would be used as a guide by the Historic Preservation Commission, acting as a design review board, in reviewing proposals for building modifications or construction. 3 Case P14008 — School Street Local Historic District Page 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Staff do not recommend approval of the formation of the proposed Historic District. Staff feel that the intent of the application is misaligned with the purpose of the local historic district tool. Also, the administrative burden created by formation of the district (both on property owners and on the City) is higher than necessary and there are other tools available to provide for design requirements. 2. Staff have a neutral stance on the proposed design guidelines. Form of Motion 1. Motion for approval of the creation of the School Street Local Historic District. 2. Motion for approval of the proposed design guidelines for the School Street Local Historic District. 4 City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission LOCATION MAP Proposed School Street Historic District L Case P18014 0 62.5 125 250 Feet School Street Local Historic District and Design Guidelines �. A N W+ + E S 5 City of Jefferson Planning & Zoning Commission VICINITY S p S9 � yAp rfyS �\ O O yq SA. /q h9y Hy(yT /�@T HCC P \��Pr yS yQy° F,Igq QpP a0 y ST✓ i�/�ypC�J�?y� ° QP0 yS RNIERA'ST_o �pC n pP�y l Sr S°y\ £ �qq<y Sy °� ryS yam° 7 )J" 2 �qY OnSB3 q"O< 4i � A qti � r mi, cy%vsr G'A AVE' P mp ?9S A�\�\pQ ✓ 'F 4 I �0 9< 2v ME9A'AVE mu Oy Pp o <<q GP rR 0 oqY"q. uqy <E � Ci' -- EEMERINEgVE MAR9HA'LN 2° ROSERIOOESIR p Case No. P18015 0 495 990 1,980 Feet School Street Historic District r". STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION — CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI May 1, 2018 CASE: School Street Local Historic District Property Owner initiated application for formation of a local historic district. NATURE OF REQUEST The purpose of the request is to form a local historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 of the City Code. The application materials include responses to the criteria for formation of a local historic district as outlined in City Code. Proposed design guidelines for future construction and renovations within the district were submitted with the application. The application was signed by 22 of the 28 property owners within the proposed district, which meets the 75% property owner signatory requirement for application for a local historic district. PUBLIC NOTICE AND INFORMATIONAL MEETING Notice of public hearing has been mailed to all property owners of record within the proposed district and public notification signs have been placed within the proposed district. A public informational meeting giving details of the proposal, application process, and resulting regulatory requirements was held on April 19. CRITERIA FOR NOMINATION OF LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT The application includes a narrative describing how the area qualifies for designation based on the criteria for formation of a local historic district outlined in Section 8-44 of the City Code. Please see the application narrative for applicant responses as to how the district qualifies under each of the criteria. Staff have attempted to summarize the narrative as follows: The narrative states justification for formation of the historic district based on four general points. 1. The association of the neighborhood with the broader event of segregation. 2. The association of the neighborhood with "The Foot", an adjacent commercial center that once served the area. 3. The residence within the area of past Lincoln University professors and other notable figures. 4. The historic architecture of the area. REQUIRED FINDINGS The Commission must make a determination as to whether the area qualifies for nomination pursuant to one or more of the criteria for nomination. If the Commission finds that the area qualifies under the review criteria, the commission must make a determination as to whether the area has sufficient integrity of Iocation, design, materials and workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or restoration. Petition by property owners, with 75% of the owners having signed the application forms, is not by itself sufficient justification for formation of a local historic district, the application must meet the required findings as well. PROCEDURE FOR PROCESSING LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT APPLICATION The primary purpose for formation of Local Historic Districts (as outlined in the city code of the City of Jefferson) is to serve as justification for enactment of building design regulations. The state statutory allowances for such regulations are heavily rooted in zoning powers granted to cities by the State. If approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, the application for Local Historic District and proposed Design Guidelines would be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission (primarily for review and recommendations regarding the design guidelines) prior to being sent to the City Council for consideration. Both meetings would be public hearing style meetings. DESIGN GUIDELINES The primary purpose of formation of a local historic district is to regulate the building design in the interest of preserving historical character, and formation of a local historic district necessities adoption of design criteria regulating future construction and building modifications. The application includes proposed design guidelines, which are a subjective set of criteria that would be used by the Historic Preservation Commission when reviewing future building permit applications for the area. If approved, any future exterior building proposals or modifications in the area would be subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. Please see the design guidelines document. Staff have attempted to summarize the design guidelines as follows: 1. Building Modifications — encouragement of rehabilitation over replacement of exterior features, with replacement features, materials, windows, roof forms, etc. needing to be compatible with existing features in the area. Building additions to the side or rear. 2. New Buildings — Similar in scale and character to existing buildings. Setbacks along existing build lines and no garage doors facing street 3. Site Features — Limited front yard paving. Landscaping features consistent with area. 7 School Street Local Historic District Application Page 2 Historic Preservation Commission CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES/RELATION TO FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS Substantial improvement floodplain regulations prohibit improvements of greater than 50% of the value of a structure that is located within a floodplain and below the regulated elevation for the community (which is 1' above base flood elevation). Federal floodplain regulations provide for an exemption from the 50% substantial improvement regulation for contributing historic structures within a certified district. It is not clear to city staff whether the formation of a local historic district would result in relief from the substantial improvement floodplain regulations for the structures within that district nor is it clear to city staff as to the mechanics of how that determination would be made. Repeated attempts to obtain clarity on this topic from state and federal regulators have not provided a clear understanding or definitive answer. It is city staffs understanding that any relief from substantial improvement regulations that may be available, would only be available to structures that are "contributing" structures. The application proposes that all 27 of the structures located within the district be designated as "contributing". It is city staff's understanding that if the area were designated a National Register District, the contributing structures within the district would qualify for relief from the substantial improvement floodplain regulations. PRIOR HISTORIC STUDIES Two studies, meeting qualifications outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations, have been conducted in the area: 1. An Architectural/Historic Survey was prepared by the The Urbana Group for the Jefferson City Commission on Historic Preservation and Jefferson City Department of Planning and Code Enforcement in September 1992. This study found that of the 27 properties within the proposed School Street Historic District, only 12 were identified as contributing to a potential historic district. 2. An Architectural Survey of the Proposed Improvements to the Rex Whitton Expressway was completed in July 2008. This study focused primarily on the Lafayette corridor, with 7 of the 27 properties within the proposed School Street Historic District being included in the study. The seven properties were not identified as having potential for the National Register or having district potential. TYPES OF DISTRICTS PERMITTED BY CITY CODE The primary purpose of local historic designation is to serve as justification for and establish design requirements for the associated district. The process for establishment of local historic districts was put in place in 1998, as part of a tiered structure of tools available for implementation of design requirements in historic areas. The three tiered system that was put in place in 1998 was as follows: 1. Neighborhood Conservation Advisory District — Advisory requirements only. 2. Neighborhood Conservation Planned District — Objective process, with design requirements established. 3. Historic District — Subjective process involving design review board (the Historic Preservation Commission). In 2006, the regulations for Neighborhood Conservation districts were rewritten and moved to the Zoning Code, and the allowance for formation of an advisory district was removed altogether. Section 8-40 of the City Code provides guidance for evaluating proposals for districts on a sliding scale, with most careful scrutiny given to applications for historic districts in comparison to the conservation districts. EXISTING CITY CODE The existing city code language pertaining to formation of a local historic district is heavily tied to applications for building permits, rather than a "Certificate of Appropriateness" process as is most common for historic districts in other communities. Recent amendments associated with adoption of the 2015 Building Code have resulted in removal of requirements for building permits for modifications on the exterior envelope of a building, which is out of sync with the purpose of establishing design requirements for a local historic district. City Staff believe that, if the district is approved, an amendment to the city code would be necessary to provide clarity on how proposals for exterior modifications would be processed. Other areas of potential amendment include formation of an appeal process and providing for representation of the district on the zoning map. School Street Local Historic District Application Page 3 Historic Preservation Commission STAFF ANALYSIS Staff have broken the analysis of the application into a number of individual components as follows: 1. The application narrative goes into great detail on the history of the nation, Jefferson City, and the general eastside area, and ties justification of the formation of the district to broader historical trends. However, the area does not appear to be the location of a notable or defining element of that history. Staff are concerned that the link to broader historical trends may not be a strong enough link to warrant historic designation. 2. The narrative identifies several Lincoln University professors and others that resided in the area, with specific addresses of their residence and summary of notable events of their lives. Staff concern is that residence within an area may not be a strong enough tie to warrant historical significance for the structure or justify historic designation of the area as a whole, that the location of their achievements (primarily Lincoln University) is a more relevant tie to their accomplishments. 3. The narrative describes the architectural details of the structures within the proposed district, with a large number of the structures being four square style and other structures representing a number of architectural styles. Staff are concerned that the structures within the area may not be of sufficient distinguishing architectural characteristics to warrant historic designation. 4. The City Code indicates that most careful scrutiny and consideration shall be given to applications for historic districts (as opposed to applications for lower levels of the tiered structure of districts put in place in 1996). Staff are concerned that the level of historic designation proposed by the application may conflict with this guidance, that the general public would be hard pressed to identify the proposed district as being a significant feature of Jefferson City history, worthy of preservation and restoration under the most stringent regulations available, while other areas of the City that are commonly cited as being historic do not benefit from an equal or greater designation. 5. Staff are concerned that the number of structures that are represented as contributing structures conflicts with analysis undertaken as part of the Lafayette interchange highway project and the 1992 Urbana Group Architectural Survey study. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff do not feel that the required findings for approval of a local historic district are met, as outlined in the staff analysis. Staff recommend that Commission members carefully consider the information put forward as justification for historic district designation, as well as the level of historic designation that is sought. REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That the area qualifies for nomination pursuant to one or more of the criteria for nomination. B. That the area has sufficient integrity of location, design, materials and workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or restoration. FORM OF MOTION (two separate motions) 1. Motion for approval of the application for formation of the School Street Local Historic District. 2. Motion for approval of the proposed design guidelines for the School Street Local Historic District. E Excerpt of Un -Approved Minutes City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Minutes Regular Meeting — Tuesday, May 1, 2018 Council Chambers — John G. Christy Municipal Building 320 E. McCarty Street Commission Members Present Mary Schantz Steven Hoffman Bill Case Donna Deetz Art Hernandez Nathan Percy Doug Record Commission Member Not Present Jane Moore Council Liaison Present Laura Ward Staff Present Attendance Record 6of6 6of6 6of6 6of6 5of6 6of6 5of6 5of6 Sonny Sanders, Planning and Protective Services Director Eric Barron, Planning and Protective Services Planning/MPO Manager Jayme Abbott, Neighborhood Services Manager Sheri Johnston, Neighborhood Services Specialist Kelly English, Neighborhood Services Assistant and Commission Secretary Bryan Wolford, Associate City Counselor Guests who Testified During Public Hearing Jenny Smith, property owner of 2 parcels of land in the proposed district Jane Beetem, resident at 1612 Payne, Jefferson City Patsy Johnson, Jefferson City Cultural Arts Foundation and 908 Lafayette St. resident Tony Smith, property owner of 2 parcels of land in the proposed district Rev. Dr. Cassandra Gould, Quinn Chapel AME Church Glover W Brown, Friends of Lafayette and the Historic Foot District Matt Holland, had rental property in the proposed district Tristan Hayes, 412 Lafayette St. resident in the proposed district New Business School Street Local Historic District Application and Proposed Design Guidelines Mr. Barron presented the staff report on the School Street Local Historic District Application and the Proposed Design Guidelines. He informed the Commission of the following staff concerns regarding the application: • Lack of strong connection between historic events and boundaries of district, • Architecture, while being reminiscent of early century buildings, lacks notable or defining elements, • Lack of historic identity amongst the general public, • Conflict with prior historic studies. Mr. Barron stated that the Proposed Design Guidelines are fairly typical for a historic district, and only apply to exterior changes to houses in the School Street Local Historic District. He stated that the Design Guidelines would not be part of a subjective review process with the commission acting as the review board for any proposal to modify buildings in the area. 10 Excerpt of Unapproved Minutes Historic Preservation Commission Page 2 May 1, 2018 Mr. Barron recommended that Commission Members carefully consider the information put forward as justification for the historic district designation, as well as the level of historic designation that is sought. The following citizens were present to testify about the School Street Local Historic District: • Jenny Smith is the applicant for the proposed historic district and spoke in favor of the Local Historic District application. Jenny and Tony Smith live at 1211 Elmerine Ave., Jefferson City. They own 2 parcels within the proposed School Street Historic District; 612 and 614 E. McCarty St. Jenny said FEMA had informed several interested individuals, via conference call and an email that the City was in charge of managing local flood plains. She believes the local historic designation would lift restrictions imposed by the FEMA flood plain regulations regarding the 50% substantial improvement rule in the proposed district. Jenny said she thought it would allow property owners in the area the ability to further improve their homes which would revitalize the area. She said if the structures are demolished, FEMA prohibits new construction on the area. Art Hernandez asked Jenny Smith why was the application was filed now and not years earlier. He stated that many of the structures need significant rehabilitation. Jenny responded that it should have been done earlier. She said they are hoping with the lifting of the 50% substantial improvement rule, it will allow more opportunities for property owners to make necessary improvements to the properties in the proposed district. Art said it appeared, by the viewing the signatures on the application, that about 80% of the homes are not owner -occupied. Jane Beetem is a resident at 1612 Payne Dr., Jefferson City, and she spoke in favor of the application. She explained the reasoning given to the boundaries of the proposed Local Historic District application. She said about 25% of the properties are owner - occupied. She said Quinn Chapel was not included in the proposed district due to it being a newer building, less than 10 years old. She said many of the property owners cannot obtain a building permit for the expensive repairs needed at this time, but hopes that if the designation as a Local Historic District is in place, the 50% rule will be waived so that the necessary repairs can be done. She said property owners want to fix up their properties but just aren't allowed to right now. • Patsy Johnson, of 908 Lafayette St., Jefferson City, spoke in favor of the Local Historic District application as a life-long resident and as a member of the Jefferson City Cultural Arts Foundation. • Tony Smith, of 1211 Elmerine Ave., Jefferson City, owns 2 parcels within the proposed School Street Historic District. He spoke in favor of the Local Historic District application. Rev. Dr. Cassandra Gould, is Pastor of Quinn Chapel AME Church at 415 Lafayette St., and spoke neutrally about the Local Historic District application. She disagrees with the current boundaries of the proposed district, and feels they were excluded from the proposed historic district. She stated Quinn Chapel is very invested in the area that has been historically African American. She feels the exclusion in the historic district is reminiscent of segregation, and feels it is insulting. She would like the matter to be put on hold so that more people could weigh in on the matter to see what is feasible for the 2 11 Excerpt of Unapproved Minutes Historic Preservation Commission Page 3 May 1, 2018 area. She would like to see an opportunity for commerce in the area, and if it becomes a historic district that it may affect zoning for commercial use. The neighborhood is declining because there is nothing there. Glover Brown, Exec. Director of the Friends of Lafayette St. and the Historic Foot District. He is a resident at 1700 Valley High Rd. He disagrees with the current boundaries of the proposed district. He said in his opinion the applicants are planning to use the proposed designation to get around FEMA's 50% rule to improve properties to enhance their personal investments. Glover requested the Commission Members table the motion to approve the Local Historic District application until the next meeting to allow time to do research and put an economic development package prepared for 408 Lafayette, 624 E. McCarty and 410 Lafayette St. • Matt Holland, and a partner are property owners of 624 E. McCarty St., Jefferson City. Matt spoke neutrally regarding the Local Historic District application. His rental property is not in the flood plain and he is 100% indifferent to what happens. Art Hernandez asked Bryan Wolford for counsel regarding what effect tabling the application would have on the application itself. Bryan Wolford stated if the Commission does not act on the Local Historic District application at this meeting, or if they table the agenda item, the applicants will have to reapply for the designation as School Street Local Historic District and resubmit the application. Bryan said according to a provision in City Code, in Section 847, a continuance must be requested by the applicant before the hearing process has begun. Tristan Hayes, of 412 Lafayette St. and life-long resident of the area, spoke in favor of the Local Historic District application. He has watched the neighborhood decline and would like it to be revitalized again. Art Hernandez moved to approve the School Street Local Historic District Application. Donna Deetz seconded the motion. Motion passed. Donna Deetz moved to approve the School Street Local Historic District Proposed Design Guidelines. Nathan Percy seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. 3 12 Cityof.leNerson Department of Planning 8 Protective Services 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573634-6410 icPla nning(a)ieffci tVmo.org wvnv jeNersoncitymo.gov Application for Nomination of a Historic District TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COAMUSSIO:V OF THE CITYOF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI Proposed Name ofDistrictSchool Street Historic District Primary contact for application: Jenny Smith Phone Number: 573-230-8245 Email Address: tpsmithster@centurylink.net Mailing Address: 1211 Elmerine Ave Jefferson City, MO 65101 Required Attachments: Map showing the boundaries of the proposed district Written responses to the required criteria for nomination Design criteria proposed for district Signature of Primary Contact Jenny Smith Name (typed or printed) nature 13 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request acconerodations or alternative formats as required underthe Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business day's to process the request. Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. (rropernes ownea Dy nusoantvwne or multiple owners must mciuue signatures of all owners.) (metuoe multiple application forms it necessary) 1. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if different from address in No. 1 I SEE ATTACHED PDF OF INOTARIZED SIGNATURES I I I On the day of beforeme personally appeared the above named persons (mown to me to be the persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. In testimony whereof. I have hereunto setmy hand and affixed my seal on the day and year first above written. (Seal) NotmyPub is Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634.6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 14 Criteria for Nomination of Historic District Include a narrative with the application that provides responses to each of the following review criteria. How does the area qualify for designation as a Historic District with respect to: 1. Its character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the community, county, state or nation. 2. Its location as a site of a significant local, county, state or national event. 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the community, county, state or nation. 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style valuable for the study of a period, type, method of construction or use of indigenous materials. 5. Its identification as a work of a master builder, designer, architect, or landscape architect whose individual work has influenced the development of the community, county, state or nation. 6. Its embodiment of elements of design, detailing, materials, or craftsmanship that render it architecturally significant. 7. Its embod i rie nt of design elements that make it structurally or architecturally innovative. 8. Its unique location or singular physical characteristics that make it an established or familiar visual feature. 9. Its character as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure, including, but not limited to, farmhouses, gas stations, or other commercial structures, with a high level of integrity or architectural significance. 10. Does the area have sufficient integrity of location, design, materials and workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or restoration? 15 Excerpt of Sections 8-44, 8-46 and 8-47 of the City Code. Sec. 844. Nomination of Historic Districts. A. Application/Nomination. Applications for nomination of an historic district shall be made to the CJHPC by at least seventy-five percent (75%) of all owners of record. Forms and criteria for nomination will be available at the office of the Department of Planning and Protective Services. Applications must be submitted to the department; the department shall forward applications to the CJHPC. Each historic district must be nominated by a separate application. Each historic district must be designated by a separate ordinance. The designation of a historic district shall in no way alter the uses permitted by the existing zoning district of the property so designated. B. Notice. Upon receipt of an application for nomination of an historic district, the department shall notify the property owners within the proposed district of the application, arrange for a time and place of a meeting, and invite all interested persons to appear and be heard. C. Criteria for Nomination. The criteria for nomination shall apply to applications for designation of historic districts and landmarks. The CJHPC shall, after such investigation as it deems necessary, make a determination as to whether a site, structure, object or area qualifies for nomination pursuant to one (1) or more of the following criteria: 1. Its character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the community, county, state or nation; 2. Its location as a site of significant local, county, state or national event; 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the community, county, state or nation; 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style valuable for the study of a period, type, method of construction or use of indigenous materials; 5. Its identification as a work of a master builder, designer, architect, or landscape architect whose individual work has influenced the development of the community, county, state or nation; 6. Its embodiment of elements of design, detailing, materials, or craftsmanship that render it architecturally significant; 7. Its embodiment of design elements that make it structurally or architecturally innovative; 8. Its unique location or singular physical characteristics that make it an established or familiar visual feature; or 9. Its character as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure, including, but not limited to, farmhouses, gas stations, or other commercial structures, with a high level of integrity or architectural significance. Any site, structure, object, or area that meets one (1) or more of the above criteria, shall also have sufficient integrity o f location, design, materials and workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or restoration. D. Anneals. A decision by CJHPC to deny an application for nomination may be appealed to the planning and zoning commission in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 35 of the Code of Jefferson City. Sec. 8 46. Procedure for review following designation of landmark or historic districts. A. Building Permit Standards. After a landmark or historic district is designated by ordinance each, application for building permit within the area so designated shall be referred to the CJHPC for review at a regularly scheduled CJHPC meeting. Applications shall be submitted a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the meeting of the Commission. If the CJHPC makes no report within forty-five (45) days of receipt of the application, it shall be considered to have made a report approving the application. B. Design Criteria. The CJHPC shall prepare and adopt specific design criteria as it deems necessary to supplement the provisions of this ordinance. Within each of the designated categories, the design criteria will be applied more stringently to properties of greater significance than those with lesser significance as determined by their respective designation. The CJHPC may from time to time amend and supplement to the criteria used for review of historic districts and landmarks. The CJHPC must first approve additional design criteria not listed in this chapter, and any changes thereto, before the criteria or changes shall become effective. (Ord. No. 12794, § 1, 8-17-98). Sec. 847. Definitions. Design criteria. A standard of appropriate activity that will preserve the historic and architectural character of structure or area. Historic district. An area designated as an historic district by ordinance of the city council and which may contain within definable geographic boundaries one (1) or more significant sites, structures or objects, and which may have within its boundaries other properties or structures that, while not of such historic and/or architectural significance to be designated as landmarks, nevertheless to the overall virtue characteristics of the significant sites, structures orobjects located within the historic district. 16 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of a Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of a Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 846 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 844 and 846 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) 1. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if different from address in Na 1 615 School Lisa Castillo ;ay 617 School Lisa Castillo �' �,��, 624 School Lisa Castillo ' 0 On the � day of Q01 )E rn InE , o70 before me personally appeared the above named persons known to me to be the persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged thio cuted the ame a • eir free act and deed. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and alftxed my seal onthedayandyearfaslabovewritten. PAM S. RICH (Seal) Notary Public �rytatebot� NSCUD Seal S c;oan nn1 IOf 0019 t;0u Olnaaa Ian idmroer 16469633 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats er t e Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 17 MV , 4J to T r q m O a k .73 V s r 0 N (''7 N .y V Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of I listoric District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the Cay of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 846 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) I. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Meiling Address if difrerent from address in No. 1 622 School Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 � e- hev\ uJ kaaue�'— 5 i e h¢.,. -Gid baa' z 2 '10(0 C Gns.ri:, sr Se F('en(o,t; On the _Doktj day of .CiY 1�7`L.— L1_ before tme personally appeared the above ranted persons known to me to be then and who executed the foregoing ns trutnent; and acknowledged that they eeecuted the same as their free act and deed. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto atlired my seal on the day and year first above written. Nnrari Public Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative fomtats as required under the-tt�tie;d tt( Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.18 ''**14,-frO n Proposed Name of District SGli'1661 S6re-6 M14rte-t Designation of a Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application fomes if necessary) I. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if different from address in No. 1 2182- SLtMOL, S- PLSe9 . -D w. v ��W cf4 L k-V'u f.� 1 41) L4G104fTffg- S+ ,d82/ a,t% Dd' / 4 AW oDG aJ L' ID ca r Y , S,'eb e AleG 1011. Es Cork pt I i ) EI e.r; le t2 F C;4u<<a'r-+ e v, I KI WMXA� ' AN) � �..L "� VV\ �n r'F � � v S y,,•".� I : I i � w+2..rx=� �vLZ •F•h On the -dayof NOVPMbe:10)7r , o)7 before me personally appeared the above named persons known to me to be the persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that they • d the same • s the' a act and deed. In testimony whereof I have bej jj cetdrn•, h;,,,d anJ affixed my seal on the day and year first above written. f ''°'.'� .uf,N I U4") � lG A St781 (Sli Nolay Pt hlic Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act Please allow three business days to process the rcqucst. 19 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of a Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of a Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of buflding permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) 1. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if different from address in No. 1 620 School Street;Jefferson City, MO 65101 Mary HarrisonP)VjdA4+16 St Rd 00; Holts Summit, MO 65043 411 Lafayett; Jefferson City, MO 65101 Mary Harrison 1916 St Rd 00; Holts Summit, MO 65043 2-0/ before me personally appeared the above named personsknown to me to be the ersons descnbed fJr► the day of "e � p y pp p p and who executed the foregoing instrument; add acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. In testimony whereof, T have hereunto set my hand and affuaed my seal on the day and year first R. HANLIN first above written. � Notary Public - Not�g¢al STATE OF MISSOURI Notary Public County of Cole Commission #'15638 . 231 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 20 19 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of a Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of a Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 846 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 844 and 846 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) 1. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if different from address in No. 1 A S&S+ T.C. M ,P—n nh f r 4h On the�0. day �Y[Lk0,Y—1 n and who executed the foregoing instrument; lardackno affixed my seal on the day and year fust above written. before me personally appeared the above named persons (mown to me to be the persons described ;uted the samepwt4eir free act and deed. In testimony whereof, 1 have hereunto set n%""d "d Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Anericans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 21 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of a Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of a Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 846 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 844 and 8-06 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) 1. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if different from address in No. 1 630 School Street I fu e,.r „a,� �'lU . ,N[N LLC Dp �u kt 4 x� PC BCA IC5 ., C:l lel' Jefferson City, MO 65101 On the day of Jams �.y Z01,F before me personally appeared the above named persons known tome to be the persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that they executed the same astheir a act and deed. In testimony whereof, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day and year fust above written. Y ,p n , i rcw� o�ruTCR Nolmy Public My Commfsston tx Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative forma Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 22 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) I. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. D7ailing Address if different from address in No. 1 �[ .�iWlC/C lwmC w,. On the :1 day of+i beforeme personally appeared the above named persons a the ersonsdescribed and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that they executed the same as Iheir free act and deed. In testimony w reof, 1 paJe'h'eSe6'tid, set my ha d and affixed my seal on the day and year fust above written. �11„ _ GD4f qU Comr; myry (Seal) NotaryPublic Cor— :H.2019 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 23 1�2O r(p,7 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of Historic District rcquQcs signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of a Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 846 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 844 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) 1. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3.Sign re 4. Mailing Address if different from address in No. 1 412 Lafayette;Jefferson City, MO 65101 Sabra Hayes 2100Tanna,Bridge: JClforsenCity, M065101 412 Lafayette;Jefferson City, MO 65101 Hugh B. Hayes 2100 Tanner Braga; Jefferson oily, M065101 On the ,a.[J dayof,Z4(Z)6I , 20 19 before me personally appeared the above named and who executed the foregoing"instmment; and acknowledged that th�et�cuted the saryG as t free act and deed. In tes allured my scat on the day and year fast above written. � c :7 r s described set hand and (Seal) Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accononodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 24 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of a Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) 1. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Onner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if different from address in No. 1 QPju A% o} c/ay u;eu,gIt On the /�. day of --'Pi [',' before me personally appeared the above named persons known to me to be the persons described and who e..ecuted the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. In testimony whereof. l have hereunto set rn• hand and affixed my sea] on the day arid 3 ear first abocewritten.�.�' =ARTHUROi 1N LL /Nnrury Puhlic• ic arth Carolina 2020 Indic iduals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request acconanodations or altematNe formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 25 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of a Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) �r I. Address of Property v C6 E- 2. Printed Nam of Property Owner i L V 60 'r na rc 4. Mailing Address If different from address in No. 1 On the —I day of I VOL) $ Mbe Y , �J 7 before me personally appeared the above named persons known to me to be the persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that t executed th�samee their free act and deed. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and afftxad my seal on the day and year first above written. y ��� �� 6 r– - - ,,-A I (Seal) Norarp Pahlic Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 26 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of a Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 846 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) I. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if different from address in No. 1 of 305 c ms+ ?F--e-- qV Ik < vv A - Ho 1, gol On the dayof \)t)zMQjer,�beforemepersonally appeared the above named persons known tometobethe persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that tyey executed thq Same as their free act and deed. In testimony whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ny seal on the day and year first above written. V 'A U � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — KAIU KAHiE Notary Public - Notary Sal Commtsflon • 151"M Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or altemative fbnm Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 27 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of a Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of a Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 846 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 844 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple ation fi)pms if necessary) 1. Address of Property Z. Printed Name of Property Omer 3. Signa 4. Mailing Address if different from address in No. 1 616 E. McCarty e �, ea jag l/ w Q Jefferson City,MO �� 'u 1616 Lsc& On the 1_dayof DeCe er , ;Z Q— before me personally appeared the abovenamed persons known to one to be the persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free actand deed. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day and year first above written. ,�}} /1 I.. n d..n Ia A.,n Notary Public Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accotmtrodations or allemalive Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Public - Notary Seal 92 �u Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of a Historic District requires signatures of 75% of properly owners within district. Designation of a Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 84A and 8-46 of the City Code. fnrnnrrtirc nwneri by hushand/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) 1. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if (ifferent from address in No. 1 /AQ 18 4 A, 6,et-t,HO/�o /3oQose.✓�eKJ o On the day of A) o u erj ea" Q0 11 before me personally appeared the above named persons known tonic to be the persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged thio cured theSame o-ttr r free actand deed. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and aflixcd my seal on the day and year first above written.PAMS.RICH Nat^rvi Public I'MarYSeal all Nota yPub6m c D: ate of kLsscu'i Ccmissr^net for .ole Gcu _ c. r;i 19 ���� nmissi :n i;umb-r 154596 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative foments as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 29 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Onner 4. Mailing Address if different from address in No. 1 1618 E McCarty; Jefferson City, MO 651011 R Kay Dinoifo I ( Lf- , lyl'W jl%'YAW %1 ( 1 1302 Roseview Dr. Jeff City 65101 1 On the CX4 day of rel)rudr�j , tJ—D I? before me personally appeared the abovenamed persons known to me to be the persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that they executed the rre as thew free act and deed. In testimony wh reof,d and affixed my seal on the day and year fust above written. Nma4l public - Notary Seal ,,,///,,,���� State ofrallaMissouri (Seal) hl CommissPoned for Callaway Coumv Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634.6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 30 Proposed Name of District Die, 5-�r i c.4— Designation of Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wife or multiple owners most include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forts if necessary) I. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Ouner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if (Efferent from address in No. 1 62-0 E MinCArh 0MA-9- «;9A- T1s"�23�ern -4�f On the dayof Notjgz2,hgr �0�� beforemepersonally appearedtheabovenamed and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that the ed the same a. cir free act and deed. In tes affierd my seal on the day and year first above written. da"1 2) (mown to me to be the persons described hereof. I have hereunto set my hand and 41hllr,-NP.13ry Seal (Seal) ,,;;d.; ,.; ( ) '.c, I Ir I I . � Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 31 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of Historic District requires signatures of 75% of propertyowners withi Designation ofa Historic District includes the enactment of building design stan district. ndards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained whin the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Canmission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We. the undersigned property owners, do request the fomtation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. (Properties owned by hushandhvifr „r ,,..11t; ae _ .. 5 cc (Yl —Cou ovL ^e On Uu 1 � day of 'O \ and who eseculed the foregoing instrument; andacknov alliwd fmseal on the day and year first above written. before me personally appeared the above named persons known tome to be the personsdescnbed �ed the same as their free act and decd. In testimony whereof, l have hereunto set my hand and 'l /I L (Scat) 0 ans .r .f„„d,t roo ;,vt the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Am:fic 32 - -- -- .......I.' ^• �•� �•��, nn.muc Signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) f. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Propertywner O 3. Signature S. klailing Address if different from address in No. I 618 School StreeCJefferson City, MO 65101 MARIATU A. TEJAN - w 815 Western ar'. Jefferson Ciry, MO 65109 5 cc (Yl —Cou ovL ^e On Uu 1 � day of 'O \ and who eseculed the foregoing instrument; andacknov alliwd fmseal on the day and year first above written. before me personally appeared the above named persons known tome to be the personsdescnbed �ed the same as their free act and decd. In testimony whereof, l have hereunto set my hand and 'l /I L (Scat) 0 ans .r .f„„d,t roo ;,vt the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Am:fic 32 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 846 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 844 and 846 of the City Code. (Properties owned by husband/wite or multiple owners must include signatures of an owners.) (induce mutupie application roans a necessary) 1. Address of Property 2. Printed Name or Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if different from address is No. 1 1 622 E. McCarty I Lit \ le.? r n P :�f /o o 1�1% VU, l —Y4 l cYAI-YJ;rltT Jefferson City, MO 65101 On the11 "� dayof 0V.-)oA ,�_ beforerre personally appearedthe above named persons mown to me lobe the persons described end who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that they a ed the same as their free act and deed. In testimony whereof, 1 ha*ffibilaft(03g1rand and a0bed my seal on the day and year first above written. Notary Public - Notary Seal 7 . A<r ) �,_�1 J STATE OF MISSOURI (Seal) ota Public County of Callaway r1 My commission Expires 218/1020 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634.6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 33 Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of building permit applications for all properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 846 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 844 and 846 of the City Code. trroperues owneo Dy nusDanciwae or multiple owners must include signatures of all owners.) (Include multiple application forms if necessary) 1. Address of Property 2. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Nbiling Address if different from address in No. 1 621 School Street; Jefferson City, MO 65101 i Brandi Harris I i°l.. _ ,,...(')D ' hl.,.... L . I On the i d� day of 1yt O f C L-� O i r< before me personally appeared the above named persons known to me to be the persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed In testimony whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and atioxd my seal on the day and year first above written. BRANDON DYE eat) Notary Public . Notary Soii� Notary Public State of Missouri Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. M Proposed Name of District School Street Historic District Designation of a Historic District requires signatures of 75% of property owners within district. Designation of a Historic District includes the enactment of building design standards and review of budding permit applications for an properties contained within the district by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission as outlined in Section 8-46 of the City Code. (see attached excerpt of City Code) We, the undersigned property owners, do request the formation of a historic district in accordance with Section 8-44 and 8-46 of the City Code. owned by husbana/wlte or owners rou.5I nterune SrgnarU Ub Vl as Uwucie./ ♦uu.uy.. oyy+....+............... — --- --.j. Printed Name of Property Owner 3. Signature 4. Mailing Address if [Efferent from address in No. 1 408 Lafavette St City of Jefferson 320 E McCarty St On the a3'z dayof M A*(/Al P-0100before the personally appearedthe above named persons ]mown to me to be the persons described and who executed the foregoing instrument: and acknowledged that they executed the s me as their five act and deed. In testimony where affixedttryseal onthedayandyeazfvstabovewritten. •7J� z'_% _ „ — No 17tatPublic -Nsour Seal QV ;�yLGt/Vt.�/f State of Missouri (Self, Nota Public Commissioned for Cole County n My Cornmission Expires; Septemberl4, 2020 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request acconumdations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 35 Jefferson City Local Historic District Application Criteria for Nomination of a Historic District: Include a narrative with the application that provides responses to each of the following review criteria: How does the area qualify for designation as a Historic District with respect to: 1. Its character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the community, county, state or nation. (A more complete history is attached as an addendum, for those who want more detail, including sources referenced. The Executive Summary captures the main topics of historical interest.) Executive Summary of Area History The Jefferson City neighborhood that includes the 600 block of E. McCarty St., the 400 and the west side of the 500 block of Lafayette St. and all of School St. is one that represents a part of our community's history from the post -Civil War era through the 1960s. This small neighborhood is located in the section of town where African-Americans were allowed to live prior to passage of the Fair Housing Act of 1968, when segregated housing was the norm. 1 This neighborhood retains integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association with this time period and meets Criteria A for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register): historic resources that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. Most of the other dwellings that housed African-American families in that era have been demolished, to clear the way for the Whitton Expressway (Highway 50), during Urban Renewal efforts, for construction of city facilities, or with use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to clear deteriorated structures prior to construction of housing by Habitat for Humanity. Of the remaining structures from this era in our history, the School Street Historic District (SSHD) is the most intact, showing how close these neighbors were to each other and best representing the community's African-American history. The School Street Historic District is eligible for listing as a Local Historic District or on the National Register of Historic Places due to the following: ➢ Residents of this neighborhood depended on the commercial area known as the Foot, which was located nearby, centered on the 600 block of Lafayette. African-American owned businesses in the Foot served and depended on support from African-Americans who resided nearby. As they were not welcomed in many of the downtown businesses, African-Americans relied on services received from the Foot. During urban renewal in it Throughout this document, the term "African-Americans" is often used to refer to people of color. In the different time periods discussed in this application, that term would not have been used, as it is of more recent vintage. The term "black" is also used, in this is a term found in much of the research for this report, and is not meant as a negative term. The term "negro" appears in a graphic from a 1930s publication, but is not used elsewhere. 36 the 1960s, the Foot was demolished, leaving the SSHD as the best preserved area reflecting this period in Jefferson City's history. ➢ Dr. W.A. Ross, who lived at 500 Lafayette St., marched with Dr. Martin Luther King in the historic march from Selma to Montgomery in 1962. Dr. Ross practiced medicine from his office in this house for 53 years, and held hospital privileges at Charles E. Still Osteopathic Hospital (now Capitol Region Hospital) 2 Dr. Ross also served as the Director of Health Services at LU from 1960 to 1982 and served as President of the local NAACP chapter for 35 years. Dr. Ross passed away in 2007.3 ➢ During segregation, several professors from Lincoln University (LU) lived in this area, with several of them being pioneers for African-Americans in their field. The stately four-square houses on the east side of the 400 block of Lafayette were owned by Cecil Blue, Chester Himes, James Seeney, Marcia Hammons, Lorenzo Greene, Sterling Brown, A.T. Busby, Dr. A.S. Pride and others.4 ➢ Dr. James Seeney was the first African-American to hold a Doctorate in Education from the University of Missouri. Dr. Seeney was the long-time principal of the Lincoln University Laboratory School, and head of the LU Department of Education.' The Seeney family boasts a total of 20 teachers, including Dr. Seeney's daughter, who was the first African-American teacher at St. Peter's School, and his daughter-in-law, who established the first kindergarten in the St. Elizabeth Schools and was its first full-day teacher.6 ➢ The first African-American graduate of the Jefferson City Public School System lived at 411 Lafayette St., Cecil Blue's daughter Barbara (nickname: Bobsie). Barbara graduated in 1955.' ➢ Leland G. Smith, who lived at 620 School St., is remembered for his contributions to Jefferson City schools over his 25 year career, as the top award in Jefferson City's Little Olympics competition was named in his honor. Mr. Smith graduated from Lincoln University with a B.A. and a Master of Arts from the University of Witchita, KS. Leland served as principal of Washington School from 1945 to its closure in 1956, when the public schools were integrated. He then worked for the Jefferson City Public Schools, serving as assistant to the Jefferson City School Board until shortly before his death in 1971. Mr. Smith served tdand G. Smith as the President of the Missouri State Teachers Association. [Carlos Graham's daughter recently won the Leland Smith award in the Little Olympics.] ➢ Dr. A.S. Pride (Armistead Pride), dean of the Journalism Department at Lincoln University, was nationally known in the field of journalism. Dr. Pride lived at 408 Lafayette St. In 1959, he shared his home with Eugene Harmes, an LU professor and ' The Sunday News and Tribune, June 14, 1964, pg. 32. 3 Findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page+gr&Grid+65633363, accessed 8/25/17. 4 "Yesterday & Today," Carolyn Bening, Aug. 2017 p. 4. 5 Dr. Gary Kremer, "Missouri's Black Historic Sites." 6 Interview by the author with Kenny Seeney, 9/27/17. 7 Interview with Kenny Seeney, 9/27/17; Jefferson City High School yearbook, courtesy Carolyn McDowell. 37 M.S. Lusk, an administrative clerk at Lincoln. He taught at the University of Cairo' in Egypt and Italy under a Fulbright program in 1956, and sponsored ten students who traveled to Italy with him, living with local families to learn about their culture. During the 1969-1970 school year, Dr. Pride served as visiting professor in communications at Temple University. Dr. Pride held an A.B. degree from Michigan, an A.M. from Chicago and an M.S.J. and PhD. from Northwestern. Dr. Pride began teaching at LU in 1937. Previously, he worked as city editor for the Lamar (CO) Daily News and as a correspondent for the Denver, CO office of the Associated Press. He wrote a weekly column for the St. Louis Argus and Louisville (KY) Defender. Dr. Pride served as vice-president of the American Society of Journalism School Administrators, editor of their yearbook and chairman of its International Relations Committee. Dr. Pride was fluent in Italian, offering classes in the language at LU in the early 1960s. ➢ Dr. Cecil Blue, a professor of English at LU, is remembered today as one of the "Color Boys" — Dr. Blue and Dr. Green — that Dr. Gary Kremer has written about. Their Craftsman style bungalow was demolished to make way for the new Lafayette St. interchange with Highway 50. But Dr. Blue's home was at 411 Lafayette St., where he lived from 1946,9 presumably into the 1980s. 'I Dr. Blue was educated at Harvard, taught English at LU from 1928 until his retirement in 1973, and served as President of the Missouri conference of the American Association of University Professors in 1969- 197 1. ➢ Dr. Lorenzo Greene was a member of the LU faculty from 1933 to his—� retirement in 1972. He was described as "one of Missouri's foremost leaders in developing equal rights for blacks."12 Dr. Green served as acting head of the History and Government Department for LU at the end of his long career, and was selected as a representative of the National Association of the Study of Negro Life and History on the American Revolution Bicentennial Commission's Heritage 76 F:_ Committee. In 1971, Dr. Green received an honorary degree from the University of Missouri. (Another recipient that same year was R. Marlin Perkins, the well-known former director of the St. Louis Zoo.) ➢ Professors Arthur and Marcia Hammons lived at 409 Lafayette St.. Arthur Hammons was a Professor of Agriculture and Marcia Canty Hammons was a Professor of Home Economics. ➢ The architecture exhibited in this neighborhood, while not high -style dwellings like those found on Capitol Avenue, represents housing typical of middle class families in this area a News -Tribune Aug. 12, 1956, pg. 1 9 Cole Co. Recorders Office, Book 110, Page 226, 2/20/1946. 10 "Missouri's Black Historic Sites: A View Over Time," Dr. Gary Kremer for the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. Accessed Sept. 20, 2017 at httPs:Hdnr.mo.gov/shpo/survey/SWAS017-R.pdf u Daily Capitol News, March 19, 1970, pg. 10. u Jefferson City Post -Tribune, April 18, 1972, pg. 2. 0 built from 1885 to 1920. A brief architectural description of each house is provided in this document. This summary, and the extended history in the addendum, are not intended to be the full and complete history of the School Street Historic District. But the items included in the summary give the reader a sense of the history represented by the people who lived here, and the houses where they lived. While LU represents an important part of our community's history, the stories of the African- Americans who lived in this area and built or supported African -American -owned businesses in the commercial area known as the Foot (demolished during Urban Renewal) also needs to be preserved. The other areas that remain from the African-American community are located on Lafayette St. and E. Dunklin St., Maple St., Jackson St. and Roland Street. The blocks adjacent to LU are already being purchased and houses demolished by the university. A number of houses on Maple and Jackson Streets were demolished and replaced during urban renewal by more modem houses during the 1960s. Roland St. was developed by the Jefferson City Housing Authority during and after urban renewal in the 1960s and 70s, as African-Americans could not buy lots and build houses elsewhere in the city. This leaves the subject neighborhood as the oldest and possibly the most likely to remain intact into the future. i 2. Its location as a site of a significant local, county, state or national event. The School St. Historic District, shown at far left in 1960, and at left in 2011 aerial photos. This neighborhood remains largely intact. One house on the west end of the 600 block of E. McCarty St. and at the end of School St. were demolished for construction of the greenway, and several houses removed for Quinn Chapel on Lafayette. Discussion under the Detailed History of SSHD (attached) explains why African-American residents of Jefferson City came to be concentrated in the area where the proposed Historic District is located. To fully understand why the proposed Historic District is significant to Jefferson City's history, we must review what happened to the rest of the area where African- American residents lived prior to the 1960s. Urban Renewal — Nationally With the increase in popularity of the automobile, people began to live farther from work, resulting in ever-expanding growth of suburbs and semi -rural developments near urban areas. As inner cities were drained of residents, particularly after World War II, cities faced an increase in 39 deteriorating rental and vacant properties. The federal government's attempts to address issues related to poor quality housing and inner city deterioration have been controversial since they began in the 1940s, with passage of the 1949 Housing Act. Title I of this Act focused on "slum clearance." The 1954 Housing Act was supposed to shift the focus away from demolition and towards rehabilitation and preservation of housing. Other legislation dealt with problems related to relocation of those displaced by Title I programs. In the 1960s, less focus was given to quality housing stock, and more to development of healthy communities. Reorganization of the Housing and Home Finance Agency resulted in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, known as HUD, in 1965. The Fair Housing Act passed in 1968, further directing funding efforts." Helping to change these programs were critics such as Jane Jacobs, who decried destruction of historic neighborhoods and construction of modernist replacements. Her 1961 book The Death and Life of Great American Cities contained her arguments that "cities embodied organized complexity and that so-called `disorderly' slums were better than the rationally planned spaces that displaced them, both economically and socially." Since then, concerns have been raised regarding political, social and legal implications including the impact of eminent domain on property rights, aesthetic concerns, incorporation of historic preservation in revitalization efforts, justice and equity — particularly that the burden of displacement created by urban renewal landed on poor and minority residents without consultation or compensation. Urban Renewal — Jefferson Citv Jefferson City has undergone a number of Urban Renewal initiatives. Quinn Chapel was relocated from E. Miller Street to Lafayette in 1955 due to early urban renewal efforts, 14 and relocated again recently for the Lafayette St. interchange. Another early project was a $13 million project in a 5 -block area near the Missouri State Capitol. This project removed the buildings on the southeast corner of the Capitol block, including the Old Post Office and the Central Hotel, made room for the Senate parking garage near Lohman's Landing and removed buildings from three blocks north of First Baptist Church and opposite the Missouri Pacific train depot on State Street.15 The next project involved a much larger area, including all of downtown from Missouri Boulevard on the west, Highway 50 on the south, Lafayette on the east and the Missouri River on the north. Numerous buildings were demolished for creation of parking lots or to allow new construction. The roundhouse by the railroad was demolished in this urban renewal project. The most recent urban renewal effort was located in the Millbottom area, west of the Missouri State Capitol and north of the Whitton Expressway (Highway 50). This area was cleared of numerous commercial businesses and a few houses from the early days of Jefferson City's development to make way for state office buildings and associated parking lots. The Jefferson City Housing Authority was created by the Missouri Legislature in the late 1950's. By 1960, Executive Director Ted J. Herron was building the first Public Housing Project 11 Elora Raymond, "The Economic Effects of Urban Renewal," Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta website, Sept. 18, 2014, http://realestateresearch.frbatianta.org/rer/2014/09/the-economic-effects-of-urban-renewal.htmi, accessed Aug. 26, 2017. la Michelle Brooks, News Tribune. is News Tribune, March 1964. 40 in Jefferson City. It was built on what had been locally called "goat hill" because of the livestock that ran freely there. Tar paper shacks without indoor plumbing gave way to modern apartments. The new units had up-to-date kitchens with stoves, refrigerators and running water. 16 The "goat hill" project was located at what was the edge of town at that time. During and after the Great Depression, displaced white families built whatever type of shelter they could on this hill. So the houses that were replaced here were temporary in nature, not ones that families had lived in, paid mortgages on and where they had raised their families for decades.17 The Housing Authority worked closely with Lincoln University in selecting the area to be included in the next urban renewal project. Forty years after Lincoln started attracting top-notch professors to teach in Jefferson City, the tensions within the African-American community had begun to bubble to the surface. This was Lincoln University's opportunity to remove what they viewed as blight, with the cafes, bars and pool hall, the barber shop where men could gather to "chew the fat," and where drinking likely occurred adjacent to the entrance to their university. These small, crowded businesses provided for the needs of the poor and working class members of the African-American community. The academics, in their offices high on the hill above, may have seen this as a chance to distance themselves from those on the other end of the economic spectrum in the African-American community. The Housing Authority's report referred to the Foot and the surrounding area as "a slum, blighted, deteriorated and deteriorating, an economic and social liability and a menace to the public health, safety and welfare in its present condition and use." 18 Whatever motivations were involved, the result was that a large number of African-American families and rental property owners were encouraged to sell their homes to the Housing Authority. A number of years ago, a former resident of the area remembered that time, saying his parents were glad to sell their home. It was only later that they realized that their community had been dismantled, its residents scattered as they searched for housing elsewhere. 19 The Housing Authority had not planned to construct publicly funded housing in the cleared area, as federal regulations discouraged such repopulation in urban renewal projects. But, the people displaced by demolition of housing could not buy or rent houses elsewhere in the community due to the prevalence of race discrimination. Discrimination in housing may have been outlawed in 1968, but integration didn't become common in Jefferson City until the 1980s. So the Housing Authority built 50 units of public housing on E. Elm St. and purchased and developed 27 lots on Franklin and Roland Streets, near the southern end of the project, so that African-Americans could purchase lots and build houses. Ultimately, only a handful of the 21 families displaced from E. Elm St. built houses in the new development, as banks wouldn't lend them money for 16 Jefferson City Housing Authority website, accessed Aug. 27, 2017. 17 News Tribune. Jan. 11, 1960, pg. 1. 18 Michelle Brooks, News Tribune. 19 Jane Beetem, interview with Joe Bell, Indiana State Emergency Management Agency, June 2006. A. G. Bell is shown as owning 522 Lafayette in the 1957 city directory. In 2006, Mr. Bell's father (A.G. Bell) was living in Fulton, having left Jefferson City after selling his house on Lafayette. 41 new homes. The rest of the buyers were Lincoln University faculty and staff.20 In 1959, the majority of the Foot was demolished in preparation for construction of the Whitton Expressway. The new highway was constructed over Lafayette Street between Elm and Miller Streets, in the middle of the 500 block. The majority of Jefferson City's African-American residents lived nearby in areas that were razed in 1962 as part of the Campus View Urban Renewal Project, directed by the Jefferson City Housing Authority. This once vibrant neighborhood included a densely developed area on E. Elm St., where public housing was later constructed, Lafayette from Elm to E. Dunklin St., Dunklin between Jackson and Lafayette, ;, _;_..........._. much of Locust St., Maple St., the 500, 600 and 700 blocks of Lafayette St., Cherry St. and Chestnut St. 21 E. Dunklin St. o aE A- Lafayette St. Lincoln University After removal of the Foot, the Housing Authority became the Land Clearance Authority for Jefferson City. In the late 1960's and the 1970's the Land Clearance Authority worked on projects in neighborhoods all over town. One example was the purchase and demolition of the former M.M. Parsons _ y l: .' Campus View Urban Renewal house, and construction of the Hamilton Project Area, 1962 and Dulle Towers on State Street. The Housing Authority also purchased the Jefferson Female Seminary on the south side of State St., and after years of deterioration and occupation by homeless individuals, sold the property to Dean Martin and Carol Blaney, who rehabilitated the structure in the 1990s. Adjacent to the towers is 505 State, initially purchased for use as a library for tower residents. When that plan was terminated, the house was vacant for 18 years before being sold and rehabilitated. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the big urban renewal project was in the Millbottom area, where a number of commercial, industrial and residential structures were located and where floodwaters from Wear's Creek and the Missouri River had been a problem. In the beginning of this project there was a survey done of the project area, to identify historic and archaeological resources during the planning phase. A number of historic buildings had their history and architecture researched and documented, with Historic American Building Survey documentation filed in the Library of Congress for cultural resources that were demolished. The Byrd -Haar House, now a nail salon, was moved from W. Main to Bolivar Street so it could be preserved. The Upschulte House was moved from W. Main to the rear of the Cole County Historical Society property in the 100 block of Madison Street. The Joseph Porth House, now home to Architects Alliance, was rented for a number of years to the Corps of Engineers before being sold by the Housing Authority. This project provided space for construction of state offices in the Truman Building and the Secretary of State's building, as well as numerous parking lots. 30 Shelby Rowe, News Tribune, Oct. 30, 2016. 21 "Site of Proposed Urban Renewal Project;' News Tribune May ?, ???? 42 The former MoDOT garage has been renovated and additions constructed to provide state office space for MoDOT employees with adjacent parking. The Hagan -Brooks house at 501 Cherry had been continuously owned for over 110 years by two African American families from 1872 until purchased by the City of Jefferson in January 1982 to be torn down for a bus maintenance garage. Much has been written about "The Monastery" and its identical neighbors. When consultants for the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) wrote their report in July 2008, they stated that these four houses, built in an identical Craftsman style, "possess both social, historical, and architectural significance..." and were eligible for listing on the National Register. 22 Yet they were demolished after documentation was completed to allow construction of new ramps for the Lafayette / Highway 50 interchange circa 2015. The term "urban renewal" has developed such a negative connotation since the 1960s and 1970s that it is not often used any more. Instead, the city has turned to use of CDBG funds to remove individual structures, then often gives the vacant lots to the local Habitat for Humanity chapter to build new homes. Habitat has rehabilitated several older homes, but construction of new homes remains the organization's preference. Several of the oldest houses remaining in the E. Miller — Cherry area where African-Americans lived in the past were demolished for redevelopment of the lots by Habitat. For the proposed Historic District area, the city plans to use federal funds to demolish houses to implement a floodplain map that was revised in 2012. A number of articles and reports in recent years have indicated that the only remnants of the Foot were the Community Center on E. Dunklin (owned by the city and listed on the National Register) and Dr. Ross' former house at 500 Lafayette. Perhaps that is because so much emphasis has been placed on the commercial aspect of the Foot. But the Foot and its surrounding residential areas were always linked, as the Foot couldn't survive without support from the African-Americans who lived within walking distance, and the residents couldn't survive without shops and other businesses where they could procure food and other services. As Faye Carter told Nancy Vessell, "You really didn't miss anything. You were just kind of in your own little world. ,23 Comparing this area to a current map shows the very few areas that remain at present where African-American residents were allowed to live: School St., Lafayette St. south of E. Dunklin St., Dunklin St. east of Lafayette St., Locust St., and some houses on Maple St.. 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the community, county, state or nation. A number of LU professors bought houses in the 400 and 500 blocks of Lafayette. These stately four-square houses were owned by Cecil Blue, Chester Himes, James Seeney, Marcia Hammons, 22 "Architectural Survey of the Proposed Improvements to the Rex Whitton Expressway, Jefferson City, Cole County, Missouri," Archaeological Research Center of St. Louis, Inc., Meredith McLaughlin, Janet Kneller, Eric Gustafson, and Robin Machiran, July 2008, p. 79. 23 Michelle Brooks, News Tribune. 43 Lorenzo Greene, Sterling Brown, A.T. Busby and others. 24 In 1959, three LU employees shared a house at 408 Lafayette: A.S. Pride, a department head at LU, Eugene Harmes, a professor and M.S. Lusk, an administrative clerk at Lincoln. Dr. R.G. Richardson lived and had his doctor's office at 421 Lafayette in 1959.25 All of the African-American residents of the proposed Historic District supported and depended on the area known as "the Foot" for supplies and services. In recent years, the Foot has been recognized as a non -extant historic area, and has been designated as such with placement of a commemorative marker in the 600 block of Lafayette. It is now time to recognize the surrounding area where those that were part of the Foot community lived as also historic. The proposed Historic District is one of the few areas remaining that relate to the community centered on the Foot. Houses located on E. Dunklin and Lafayette Streets facing Lincoln University have begun to be purchased and demolished by the university. This is in line with the university's master plan, currently being revised. Once these houses are removed, the proposed Historic District may be all that remains representing this part of Jefferson City's history. 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style valuable for the study of a period, type, method of construction or use of indigenous materials. The SSHD contains buildings that represent or were influenced by a number of architectural styles and types. Within the district are two Craftsman style houses, one Queen Anne house, one Classical Revival and one Colonial Revival influenced home. The most dominant architectural influence in the district is the Four -Square type house, which was quite popular in the 1890s through the early 1900s. There are twelve Four -Square houses in the district. Folk Victorian vernacular type houses include four Open Gable houses, three Cross -Gabled homes, one Gable Front, one L -Plan house and one Pyramidal Cottage. These styles and types were typical for middle class housing when this neighborhood was built. Architectural descriptions of each house are provided at the end of this document. 5. Its identification as a work of a master builder, designer, architect, or landscape architect whose individual work has influenced the development of the community, county state or nation. As with many houses in our community, we do not know for certain who designed or built these houses. Plan books were readily available at the time, so builders would not have needed an architect to design modest homes. No records remain from this time period that would identify builders of specific houses. 6. Its embodiment of elements of design, detailing, materials or craftsmanship that render it architecturally significant. The porches in this neighborhood are a significant feature. Almost all of the houses retain their original porch elements, with variations as to style. The most distinctive porch is found at 612 E. 24 "Yesterday & Today," Carolyn Bening, Aug. 2017 p. 4. zs Mullin-Kille et.al., 1959 city directory, p. 234, 275 et. al. 44 McCarty, with a nearly full -width Queen Anne style porch that curves out at the left side, featuring a full wooden entablature, denticulated cornice, three Doric columns set on limestone pedestals and a simple wood balustrade that follows the curved roof line on the left side of the porch. Doric style columns are also found on the porches at 608 E. McCarty, 616 E.McCarty, 407 and 411 Lafayette St.. Pyramidal roofs are dominant in this district, not only on the main structures, but on porch and dormer roofs as well. The majority of the houses are constructed of red brick, with three white painted brick houses, one stucco and one stone house. The majority of the houses facing the more visible E. McCarty. and Lafayette Streeets are two-story, while more one to one and a half story houses are found on School St. Through the use of red brick and one- story front porches, the design elements found in this district provide a sense of continuity from one house to another. A significant number of original windows remain, in their original sized openings, showing similar fenestration patterns on a number of the houses. Since there are quite a few (12) Four -Square style houses, the pattern of two large windows of the same size on the second floor is a dominant feature of the neighborhood. 7. Its embodiment of design elements that make it structurally or architecturally innovative. The houses in this district are more similar in their architecture than they are individually distinctive. They reflect architectural styles and types that were popular from the 1880s until circa 1920. The Four Square house type was very popular from 1890 to 1930, and is common in the Midwest. During this time there was a national trend toward simpler designs, in reaction to the more elaborate Victorian era style houses. The availability and abundance of mass produced stock materials facilitated construction of all the houses in the neighborhood. The Four Square house was promoted in magazines, mail order companies and companies selling plans as uniquely American and perfectly suited to the American family. The Colonial Revival style was popular from 1870 to 1940, and the Classical Revival style began after the World's Columbian Exposition was held in Chicago in 1893, as a classical theme dominated this exposition. This style remained popular until 1950. The Bungalow style was a dominant subtype in smaller houses from 1905 through the early 1920s. This style originated in California, which made this style seem more "modern" as smaller families and fewer servants required less space than the larger houses of previous years. A number of the houses in the district would be best described as Folk Victorian, particularly those that are Gabled Front, Cross -Gabled, Pyramidal or L -Plan. These house types were popular nationally from 1890 to 1910 (sometimes styles in Missouri lagged behind national trends). 8. Its unique location or singular physical characteristics that make it an established or familiar visual feature. The importance of the location of these houses, in close proximity to the Foot, cannot be overemphasized. The residents of this area were primarily African-American, as during segregation realtors and banks would not sell or lend money to African-Americans to purchase houses outside of this section of town. They depended on services and supplies found at the Foot, as they were not welcomed in restaurants elsewhere in the community. Hotels in the Foot were used by African-Americans traveling to Jefferson City, as they were not welcomed in hotels 45 elsewhere in the city. African-Americans elected to state-wide office stayed in the dorms at LU while attending legislative sessions, as they could not rent apartments outside of the African- American community. The African-American section of town operated as a town within a city. People had jobs outside the area, but they lived, shopped, went to school and church in the same part of town, making this a close knit community. The houses all retain integrity from this segregation period, and are the best remaining group of buildings that represent this period in our community's history. 9. Its character as a particularly fine or unique example of a utlilitarian structure, including, but not limited to, farmhouses, gas stations or other commercial structures, with a high level of integrity or architectural significance. Some historic garages may remain in the district, but they are not particularly notable examples of outbuildings in the community. The houses in the neighborhood are the primary structures of interest. 10. Does the area have sufficient integrity of location, design, materials and workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or restoration? Yes, as this neighborhood retains integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association with this time period and meets Criteria A for listing on the National Register: historic resources that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. Detailed History of School Street Historic District Before this area was developed, it was known as "Cottage Park," a recreational area with ball fields in the open space near Wears Creek. The annual floral parade, where residents decorated their cars and paraded them on High St. and Capitol Ave., terminated at Cottage Park.26 A number of parades still terminate nearby in the 600 block of Lafayette Street. The lots in this district were sold on August 11,1905 to A.J. Abbott from Douglas County, Missouri, for a development of moderately priced homes. The area sold was 1,000' in length along E. McCarty, School and E. Miller Streets.27 Architecture The architecture exhibited in this neighborhood, while not high -style dwellings like those found on Capitol Avenue, represents housing typical of middle class families in this area from 1870 to 1968. The importance of maintaining "normal" or "average" housing was described by Gary Kremer: The random destruction of buildings that serve as material links connecting several generations contributes to a lack of understanding on the part of one generation about how they are connecting links to those who preceded and those who will follow them. This unfortunate circumstance tends to occur with greater 26 Interview with Dr. Gary Kremer by the author, Oct. 24, 2017. 2' Tim Young, from research on history of Jefferson City Fire Department. 46 frequency in lower-class and ethnic neighborhoods. Residents of these often blighted areas, first of all, are relatively powerless. They have no representatives in the arenas of power where decisions are made. Moreover, their very poverty and social marginality preclude their living, worshipping, and otherwise interacting in elaborately built, architecturally sophisticated buildings. Ironically, then, we often find ourselves in a position of preserving the material culture of an unrepresentative body of people, while we destroy the houses, businesses, schools and churches of the masses. When we do this, we not only frustrate and further alienate the uprooted residents of such communities, we literally cut them and ourselves off from the past. 28 Connection to LU The houses in the subject neighborhood were spared from demolition in the 1960s because this part of town had a significant number of both white residents and Lincoln University employees. A number of the 2 -story four-square houses on Lafayette Street were owned by LU professors, while LU employees occupied five houses on School Street in 1959.29 On the 400 block of Lafayette lived five LU employees, professors and the head of a department at LU, as well as Dr. R.G. Richardson, all but one living on the east side of the block. In the 500 block, which was largely razed for highway construction, there were no LU employees and only one doctor, Dr. W.A. Ross, whose house was retained. To fully understand how this neighborhood contributes to our community's history, we must briefly consider how it relates to historical trends that are part of our nation's history. National African American History. Our founding fathers put the issue of slavery aside, instead focusing on having all thirteen original English colonies join forces during the Revolutionary War. The problem grew, as more people were imported to be sold as slaves and as new generations were born into slavery. Opposition to slavery also grew, and Congress attempted to balance new states entering the union between "slave" and "free" states. Eventually legislators in southern states voted to secede from the union, and the Civil War was begun. After President Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation, slaves in states that had seceded were freed (this did not include Missouri), and all slaves were freed when the war ended. Southern states soon passed laws known as "Jim Crow laws" that enforced segregation and denied African-American people their rights, such as the right to vote. African-Americans moved from southern states to urban areas further north to escape such discrimination and groups such as the Ku Klux Klan that killed, terrorized and intimidated them. People in cities responded to this movement by using restrictive covenants that governed the sale of real estate, prohibiting owners from selling their property to anyone of the "Negro race." In a case involving Mr. and Mrs. J.D. Shelley of St. Louis and Mr. and Mrs. Louis D. Kraemer, who had filed suit to have the �$ Kremer, "Black Historic Sites of Missouri," p. 32 - 33. ze Jefferson City Directory, Mullin-Kille Company of Missouri and New Day Press, 1959, p. 275 et. al.; Beetem interview with Glover Brawn. Crl Shelleys removed from the neighborhood for violating such restrictive covenants, the U.S. Supreme Court held in 1948 that these covenants were unconstitutional. This decision made housing discrimination illegal, but did not end housing discrimination. 30 Starting in 1933, under federal New Deal programs, the federal government responded to a housing shortage during the Depression. This program was explicitly designed to increase — and segregate — America's housing stock. Author Richard Rothstein says the housing programs begun under the New Deal were tantamount to a "state-sponsored system of segregation." The government's efforts were "primarily designed to provide housing to white, middle-class, lower - middle -class families," he says. African-Americans and other people of color were left out of the new suburban communities — and pushed instead into urban housing projects. Rothstein's new book, The Color of Law, examines the local, state and federal housing policies that mandated segregation. He notes that the Federal Housing Administration, which was established in 1934, furthered the segregation efforts by refusing to insure mortgages in and near African-American neighborhoods — a policy known as "redlining." At the same time, the FHA was subsidizing builders who were mass-producing entire subdivisions for whites — with the requirement that none of the homes be sold to African-Americans. 31 During the Civil Rights era in the 1950s and 1960s the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Brown vs. Board of Education (1954) that segregated educational facilities deprived African-American children of equal education opportunity. For years after the Brown decision, the struggle for equality continued, with African-Americans organizing protest marches and sit-ins to influence local practices. During this period Martin Luther King and John and Robert Kennedy were assassinated.32 33 A number of federal laws were passed in the 1960s to combat discrimination, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibits employment discrimination; the Fair Housing Act of 1968 that prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of housing and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which prohibits the denial or restriction of the right to vote. 34 Jefferson City Follows National Trends Jefferson City was not immune to these national trends. In the 1960s, the City Council and various boards and commissions held hearings to discuss segregation in housing. During these hearings, several realtors were called as witnesses, and stated that they would not show African- Americans houses west of Jackson St. or north of E. McCarty St., for fear of losing business with white home owners. LU students explained the difficulties of obtaining off -campus housing, as 30 "Lawsuit ended 'restrictive covenants' that prohibited property sales to blacks," Gary Kremer, The Statesman, Feb. 2000, 31 A Torgotten History' Of How The U.S. Government Segregated America; Broadcast on NPR's "Fresh Air," May 3, 2017. By. Accessed October 10, 2017 at: http://www.npr.org/2017/05/03/526655831/a-forgotten-history-of-how- the-u-s-govern men t-segregated-america. 32 Charles Wesley Jackson, "Urban Renewal and its Effects in Jefferson City, Missouri," Master's Thesis written 1955 for Master of Regional Planning, College of Architecture and Design, Kansas State University, 1965, accessed Aug. 26, 2017. 33 "Urban Renewal and the end of black culture in Charlottesville, Virginia: An Oral History of Vinegar Hill," McFarland, 1998. (books.google.com) 34 FindLaw, http://civilrights.findlaw.com/enforcing-your-civil-rights/civil-rights-laws.htmi, accessed Aug. 25, 2017. 48 property owners refused to rent to them based on their race. At about the same time that Apollo 11 made the first successful walk on the moon, Highway Patrol members wearing helmets worked to achieve calm during a period of unrest, demonstrations, violence, and arson at Lincoln University, as shown in the photo below.35 At right, a newspaper photo captioned: "Charles Jackson, desegregation leader, educator and city councilman" in 1983. Below, News -Tribune photo captioned: "Helmeted Missouri Highway Patrolmen intervening at Lincoln University during the period of unrest, demonstrations, arson and violence in May 1969. Also during the 1960s, urban renewal projects throughout the nation removed many low-income and/or African-American neighborhoods to allow development of interstate highways and for the purpose of "slum clearance." Jefferson City was part of this movement, with several urban renewal efforts removing older buildings in the downtown area, in the African-American community, and west of the State Capitol — the area known as the "Millbottom " These projects begain in the 1950s and ended in the 1980s. The term "urban renewal" began to have a negative connotation. After the 1980s, city government and the Jefferson City Housing Authority purchased smaller numbers of buildings that were deteriorated, usually one or two at a time, and demolishing them. Some of the Housing Authority's buildings were purchased and rehabilitated, such as the Jefferson Female Seminary in the 400 block of State St., the house at 505 State St. and the offices of Architects Alliance on W. Main St.. A number of houses were demolished by the city to make way for construction of new homes by Habitat for Humanity, a non-profit housing organization. Others cleared the way for city facilities or remain as vacant lots. "Jefferson City Post Tribune, July 21, 1969, p. 2. 49 Where did Jefferson Citv's African-American residents live? Beginning around the 1850s, a couple of free African-American women bought property in the area where E. Miller and Cherry St. cross. In -lot 760 was purchased in 1855 by an African- American woman named Martha King. Sarah Bolton purchased In -Lots 643/644 in August,1863. According to historian Gary Kremer, this "nucleus of a black community" emerged around the King and Bolton properties. 36 African-Americans poured into Jefferson City during the last years of the Civil War, to be under the protection of the Union troops who controlled the town. 37 Following the war most of the city's African-American population lived in the downtown area, many on what was known as "Hog Alley." Seventy-six African-Americans lived along this alley which stretched from Adams Street to Madison, between High and Main (now Capitol Avenue),38 where hogs were allowed to roam free in search of garbage to eat. There were also heavy concentrations of African- Americans near the African-American churches, in the 400 and 500 blocks of East Miller (a total of 45) and the 400 blocks of Adams and McCarty Streets. The 300 block of East Miller (the block immediately east of the Second Baptist Church) had 46 African-Americans. 39 In 1882, three young African-American children from the same family died within a few days of each other, resulting in panic spreading throughout the city. Health care during this period was what we would consider primitive, and the fear of communicable diseases was a strong motivator. Frightened residents drove all of the African-American families from their homes downtown, and boarded up the buildings to prohibit their return. Callaway County residents threatened violence if any of these families attempted to cross the Missouri River. The coroner determined the children had died from ingestion of a "corrosive substance" rather than smallpox or other disease. But residents became determined to remove all African-American families from Hog Alley. 40 Most African-American men (and some women) worked for people or businesses located downtown at this time, so finding housing nearby was critical. African-American institutions, such as Second Baptist Church, were located on the fringe of downtown, so African-American people wanted to stay within walking distance of these establishments. Second Baptist Church was, and is still today, located at the corner of E. Miller and Monroe Streets, in the third building erected on the site since 1865. The African Methodist Episcopal Church, or A.M.E., was located at Madison and E. Miller Streets, then in 1894 some of that congregation formed the A.M.E. Zion Church and built a new church at 512 Madison. Education for African-American children began in the old schoolhouse on Hobo Hill, now the location of Simonsen 9th Grade School, then in 1874 the school moved to the "Old German -English Building" in the 200 block of W. 36 Carolyn Bening, "Yesterday & Today," Historic City of Jefferson newsletter, "This Place Mattered — 501 Cherry Street," Aug. 2017, p. 4. 37 Dr. Gary Kremer, "Yesterday & Today," Historic City of Jefferson newsletter, 2/2013, recap of Kremer presentation, p. 4. 38 Kremer, "Black Historic Sites of Missouri," p. 37. 39 Ibid. 40 Gary Kremer, "City's black population once lived,..." News Tribune, Jefferson City, 12/5/1999. 50 McCarty St.. This school was renamed the Washington School in 1891, then a new school of the same name was built between Lafayette and Cherry Streets on Elm Street in 1903.41 Lincoln Institute was established on Dunklin and Lafayette Streets in 1871.42 According to Gary Kremer, the turn of the century saw an emerging African-American population of free African-Americans and ex -slaves concentrated in the 800 blocks of Miller and Elm Streets and the 500 and 600 blocks of Cherry and Chestnut Streets. 4' This small but vibrant neighborhood was anchored by Gensky's Grocery Store (now listed on the National Register of Historic Places) and the New Hope African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church at 728 E. Miller. In the 1950s, Gensky's was bought by an African American fraternal organization who in 1966 rented the lower level to Dr. Charles W. Cooper, a African-American physician. In 1982, the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) studied the stone house at 501 Cherry, purchased in 1867 by Martha King. The quality of the stonework suggested the use of unskilled prison labor - the only other documented inmate -constructed limestone structure in Jefferson City was the 1840 old city jail, demolished in 1982. In 1872 Hiram Brooks purchased the home at a time when few other African -American -owned structures existed in the vicinity, making it the earliest extant African -American -owned structure in Jefferson City at the time of the study. The War Department's 1863 General Order No. 143 authorized Union enlistment of African-American troops to ensure full citizenship. Hiram enlisted with the Union forces in 1864, serving with Missouri's 62nd regiment of the United States Colored Infantry, receiving personal freedom and some monetary aid. Private Hiram and others in the 62nd founded Lincoln Institute, now Lincoln University, as they wanted to continue the education they had acquired while in the service. The presence of African-American institutions, including Lincoln Institute at Dunklin and Lafayette Streets, and long-standing ownership of property in the area by African-American residents encouraged other African-American residents to move to the southeast corner of the city. This demographic shift is shown in the 1900 City Directory. There are 546 specific addresses listed for African-Americans in the city; 316 of those addresses (or nearly 58%) are south of McCarty and east of Adams. The heaviest concentrations of African-Americans, outside of Lincoln Institute students and faculty members living on campus, were in the 800 block of East Elm (12), the 700 block of Locust (25), and the 600 block of Lafayette (15).44 The existence of Wears Creek (which flooded fairly frequently at that time) probably aided in movement of African-American residents to this area, as land near the creek would have been less desired by white buyers and therefore less expensive to purchase, plus the prior existence of African- Americans in this area made such movement more palatable to the surrounding community. 41 It ai Gary Kremer, "City's black population once lived,..." News Tribune, Jefferson City, 12/5/1999. 42 Brooks, June 18, 2016. 43 Kremer, "Black Historic Sites of Missouri." 44 Kremer, "Black Historic Sites in Missouri," p. 38. 4s Ibid. 51 should be noted that in the 1960s the city did not extend much past Clark Avenue south of Highway 50 at that time. Lafayette Street did not extend south past Franklin St.46 James Ford quoted Julius H. Conrath in his History of Jefferson City, describing the physical location of the city's African-American community as living in the 1870s and 1880s "[e]ast of Adams and south of McCarty Street".47 In an interview by the author with Glover Brown, he described the African-American community "east of Jackson Street and south of McCarty Street."48 A news article from the 1960s reporting on a hearing regarding the practice of redlining, or refusing to sell or rent to African-American people, confirmed Jackson Street as the dividing line. 49 A study by the author of the Jefferson City 1920 Census records confirms that the majority of African-American residents lived east of Jackson Street, with several residents located near churches on E. Miller near Madison Street, primarily in the 400 and 500 blocks of E. McCarty and the 300 and 400 blocks of E. Miller St., located close to Wears Creek. There were a number of African-American - _ residents who lived with their employers, and k were scattered throughout the (circa 1930s showing cit limits Early map of Jefferson City (c ), g y community, as well as a �" " near Clark Ave. on the east, Franklin St. on the south. handful of African- American farmers who r;,` a; _ .. '' / _.►'' so lived in the county. In i� 1982, Gary Kremer r ' I LL described the most '' :r _i heavily -populated �/ _ 1' u African-American .. •'v section of Jefferson City as the area bounded by McCarty street on the north, Adams on the west, Clark Avenue on the east, and Leslie Blvd. on the south.si As important as where African-Americans lived in Jefferson City was how they lived, and the quality of housing available to them. In the early 1920s, a housing survey done by the Missouri Negro Industrial Commission reported that housing conditions for African-Americans were deplorable. The report emphasized: "Jefferson City Chamber of Commerce, "Progressive Jefferson City," 193?, Plate I; Beetem interview with Glover Brown. 47 James E. Ford, History of Jefferson City, Jefferson City, 1939. 48 Glover Brown interview by Jane Beetem, 2017. a9 The Daily Capitol News, August 3, 1967, pg. 2. so As the latest census data available is 1940 and city directories no longer state an individual's race, mapping the diversity of the area in the 1960s has not proven possible. 51 Kremer, "'Black Historic Sites of Missouri," p. 34. 52 Only 89 of the houses are located on the streets. The majority are either built in the rear of the lot, in alleys or on back streets, where it is almost impossible to reach them in rainy weather, because of the unpaved muddy streets - - -- Those houses with three rooms or less number 172. - - . Eighty per cent of the homes are without water in them and the water must be furnished by wells and cisterns. The reason that their housing was so poor, according to the Industrial Commission, was that job opportunities for African- Americans were severely limited, making it extremely difficult for African-Americans to accumulate the capital necessary to become property owners. 52 As shown in the map at right, the size of the lots between Marshall and Lafayette along Maple Street and between Dunklin and McCarty Streets east of Cherry is quite small. This would have allowed construction of a densely populated neighborhood, with less expensive homes in these areas. Not surprisingly, much of these areas were demolished as part of urban renewal in the 1960s. 1' 1'10\1 411' 1F.1'11 1:!Zll\ x'1'1'1'. a11sSoURI Map of Jefferson City showing densely concentrated housing in the areas targeted by urban renewal, primarily E. Elm and Maple Streets. The Sanborn Maps of 1908 do not fully cover the neighborhood, but in the small area depicted there are clearly two vacant frame dwellings at the rear of lots facing Elm St. between Lafayette and Cherry. 53 In studying the 1920 census data, it was striking the number of times African- Americans answered "unknown" to the question "Do you own or rent your home?" (approximately 30). 54 This could indicate they had constructed some form of housing with permission of the lot's owner, were allowed to live in a small dwelling by the owner, perhaps in exchange for odd jobs, or they were squatters. Apparently, this was not too uncommon, as the graph below shows that 2% of those surveyed in Jefferson City in the 1930s were unsure whether they rented or owned their residence. 55 s2 Ibid, p. 46. 53 Sanborn Map of Jefferson City, Feb. 1908, p. 1, University of Missouri website, accessed Aug. 26, 2017. " Study of 1920 Census Data for Jefferson City, Jane Beetem. 55 Jefferson City Chamber of Commerce, "Progressive Jefferson City," 193?, Plate IV. 53 OWN"" FAMILIES 52'/ UNKNOWN 2% TENANT w FAMILIES 46% HOME TENURE --193O Segregation As the twentieth century progressed, racial segregation further isolated the African- American community. Although no state laws prohibited integration in restaurants, bars, hotels and swimming pools, integration was prohibited by local custom. To serve the African-American community's needs, a African -American -owned business community developed on Lafayette Street, known for many years as "The Foot," as in the "foot" of the steep hill on E. Dunklin St.. A number of African -American -owned businesses located primarily on the 600 block of Lafayette St. included the Booker T. Hotel, Norman's Laundry, Pat's Shine Parlor, Turner's Service Station, the Tops Bar, Leona's Cafe and Acme Cleaners, among others.56 The Foot was home to the self-proclaimed "Color Boys," well-known LU professors Lorenzo Greene and Cecil Blue. African-American visitors to Jefferson City could stay in the Foot at the Booker T. Washington Hotel at 602 Lafayette and eat at the Green Onion. The Negro Motorist Green Book, first published in 1936, listed in its 1946 edition 15 Jefferson City businesses that welcomed African- American customers, and all but three were located within three blocks of the Foot.57 Customers of these businesses lived within walking distance of The Foot, housed within a few blocks in the southeast comer of the city. Some of these customers may have been doctors or professors at Lincoln University (LU) who held PhDs from prestigious universities, yet could not be served anywhere else in the community. From the 1920s, when the first African-American legislators were elected to the Missouri legislature, these elected officials stayed and dined on the campus of Lincoln University because there were no hotels or restaurants open to them in downtown Jefferson City. Jefferson City's African-American population and the number of businesses that served this population were larger than many towns in Missouri, even those with a larger total population. Jefferson City's population in 1940 was approximately 24,270, yet in the 1946 Green Book it had 15 businesses open to African-American customers. Compare this to St. Joseph, population 75,711 (one Green Book listing) or Springfield, population 61,238 (one Green Book listing). Sedalia, population 20,428, had three Green Book listings, while Hannibal, population 20,865, had only one .58 "Michelle Brooks, News Tribune, June 18, 2016, http://www.newstribune.com/news/local/story/2016/jun/18/preserving-foot/627847/, accessed Aug. 25, 2017. 57 Toni Prawl, "Yesterday & Today," Historic City of Jefferson newsletter, "Jefferson City's Lafayette Street: Corridor of Social Conscience." Feb. 2015, p. 10. 58Ibid. 54 Dr. Kremer has explained that the "history of the Foot could not be told separately from the story of where and why African-American residents have lived in Jefferson City, nor without the backdrop of Lincoln University."59 At the close of the Civil War, soldiers and officers of the 62nd United States Colored Infantry took steps to establish an educational institution in Jefferson City, Missouri, which they named Lincoln Institute. The school was intended to educate freed African-Americans. The school began in the old schoolhouse on Hobo Hill in 1866 and moved to the present campus in 1871. Lincoln Institute formally became a state institution in 1879 with the deeding of the property to the state. Under the second Morrill Act of 1890, Lincoln became a land grant institution, and the following year industrial and agricultural courses were added to the curriculum 60 In 1921, the Missouri Legislature passed a bill introduced by Walthall M. Moore, the first African- American to serve in that body, which changed the name from Lincoln Institute to Lincoln University and created a Board of Curators to govern the University. i During this time there was pressure on the University of Missouri to enroll African- American students, which the university and the state legislature resisted. So state funding for Lincoln University was provided at the time of the name change, which allowed President Nathan B. Young to recruit professors from ivy -league colleges and universities, including Sterling Brown and Cecil Blue from Harvard. Later, he brought aboard Lorenzo Greene from Columbia University and Oliver Cromwell Cox from the University of Chicago. Others joined the faculty, including distinguished writers and poets, earning LU the nickname "Black Harvard of the Midwest "62 Circa 1900 view of Lincoln University, Charles Opel, architect. (Summers Collection, Missouri State Archives) One interesting note about this section of town is that the segregation was never 100%, as it was not terribly unusual to find an African-American person living on a street or block otherwise occupied entirely by whites. Even more common was to find African-Americans and whites living on blocks, or one side of a block, that housed only members of their own race, while across the street or around the corner would be houses occupied by members of another race. So while the southeast section of Jefferson City was considered racially segregated, it still contained some all -white streets or blocks. Concentration of African-Americans into the area demolished as part of the Capitol View Urban Renewal Project started around 1900 and accelerated in the 59 Dr. Kremer, Historic City of Jefferson Newsletter Feb. 2013, p. 4. 60 The Soldiers' Dream Continued: A Pictoral History of Lincoln University of Missouri. Antonio F. Holland, et.al. (Jefferson City: Lincoln University, 1991.) si "Our History," accessed on Lincoln University website on Aug. 26, 2017, https://www.lincolnu.edu/web/about- lincoln/our-history. " Kremer?( 55 late 1930s and early 1940s. Increased segregation occurred during and after the Great Depression, so by the 1960s this was still a fairly recent phenomenon. 63 Gowns vs. Towns Tension developed between the African-American academics at Lincoln University and the "town blacks" who had built the business community at the Foot, with a segregationist white community surrounding and opposed to both groups. From the graph below, it is clear that the African-American community was vastly outnumbered by the white community. 64 While white doctors could buy or build a house anywhere they wanted, African - WHITE 88%d- /i�. %!, FOREIGN OORPI WHITE 11%American doctors and highly educated academics were restricted to houses `~ NEGRO 10% within the African-American community. As more funding became available for RACIAL COMPOSITION OF pOPLILATI ON - 1930 Lincoln Institute in the early 1920s through the 1940s, Lincoln University presidents tried to attract better qualified instructors by improving salaries at the school. The result was the emergence of a well-educated, financially -better -off, class of professional African- Americans who could afford to buy houses which other Jefferson City African-Americans could not afford.65 It was no accident, then, that the African-Americans who bought a number of the more attractive 2 -story houses on Lafayette, for example, or built houses on E. Dunklin directly across from the university were Lincoln University professors who made their purchases in the late thirties and early forties. A number of LU professors bought houses in the 400 and 500 blocks of Lafayette. These stately four-square houses were owned by Cecil Blue, Chester Himes, James Seeney, Marcia Hammons, Lorenzo Greene, Sterling Brown, A.T. Busby and others. 66 In 1959, three LU employees shared a house at 408 Lafayette: A.S. Pride, a department head at LU, Eugene Harmes, a professor and M.S. Lusk, an administrative clerk at Lincoln. Dr. R.G. Richardson lived and had his doctor's office at 421 Lafayette in 1959.67 Dr. W. A. Ross owned the house at 500 Lafayette, where he practiced medicine for 53 years. Dr. Ross also served as the Director of Health Services at LU from 1960 to 1982, marched in the historic march from Selma to Montgomery in 1962 and served as President of the local NAACP chapter for 35 years. Dr. Ross passed away in 2007, 68 and the house is now for sale. There was a clear divide between the LU professors, seen by local African-Americans as "well- educated outsiders" who moved to Jefferson City to teach at the "black Harvard of the Midwest" 63 Kremer, "Black Historic Sites of Missouri," p. 45 — 46. "Jefferson City Chamber of Commerce, "Progressive Jefferson City," 193?, Plate III. 61 Kremer, "Black Historic Sites of Missouri," p. 47. 66 "Yesterday & Today," Carolyn Bening, Aug. 2017 p. 4. 67 Mullin-Kille et.al., 1959 city directory, p. 234, 275 et. al. 68 Findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page+gr&Grid+65633363, accessed 8/25/17. 56 and those who were working class, whose ancestors had lived in the area for generations and built their businesses in the Foot to serve the African-American community. 69 While close proximity to LU certainly aided these businesses' prosperity, descendants of the business owners and operators believe it was the established African-American community that attracted and helped sustain the University. For example, Glover Brown, whose parents had a restaurant on Lafayette for four decades, commented, "I've heard it said that Lincoln University is an anchor in this community, but I must point out the black community was here long before Lincoln University existed."70 Urban Renewal Urban planners ignored the psychological and social worth of these buildings to the African- American community. No one ever asked the African-American residents of the community what buildings they thought important, much less tried to understand the role these buildings had played in their lives. 7' Now, over fifty years later, elderly members of the African-American community still harbor resentments regarding the loss of the Foot, and an entire generation of African-American Jefferson Citians have grown up without any appreciation of what pre -urban renewal African-American community life was like. Into the 1980s, urban renewal officials tersely asserted that there were no buildings of any historical import destroyed during urban renewal.72 Besides Dr. Ross, the rest of the 500 block of Lafayette had no Lincoln employees or doctors in 1959, and much of this block was removed, leaving only the four identical Craftsman houses that included the Monastery and Dr. Ross' house (the Craftsman houses were recently removed). 4f the four blocks surveyed by Gary Kremer in 1982, the ones with the oldest and largest concentration of African-Americans experienced the most extensive destruction of its buildings in the 1960s. Not one building remains on the 800 block of Elm Street, a dense residential area, or the 600 block of Lafayette Street, the city's most important African-American commercial area. Conversely, the area which was almost untouched by urban renewal was a block which remained partly white until the very recent past. Brief Architectural Descriptions of Houses in District: After each description is a designation in parentheses indicating if the structure is a Contributing Historic Resource to the district, "C" and how many buildings on the site are contributing, ex.: "C-1." Houses are numbered to correspond to map of district submitted with application. 1. 602 E.McCarty St. (1900) This 2 % story brick Four Square duplex has a steeply pitched pyramidal roof of asphalt shingles and a concrete foundation. The two entrances on the right or west side appear to be original. The full-fagade front porch is filled in on the left 69 Michelle Brooks, "Preserving the Foot," News Tribune, June 18, 2016. 70 Toni Prawl, "Yesterday & Today," Historic City of Jefferson newsletter, "Jefferson City's Lafayette Street: Corridor of Social Conscience." Feb. 2015, p. 10. 71 Kremer, "Black Historic Sites of Missouri," p. 33 - 34. 72 Ibid., p 33 — 34. 57 side, there is a single brick pier supporting the porch on the west side. The second floor has two 111 double -hung sash separated by a former door opening, now bricked but still evident. The roof features a central hip roof dormer on the front fagade. The brick has recently been repainted white, and appears in good repair. (C-1) 2. 606 E. McCarty St. (1913): A 1 '/2 story frame house with stucco exterior painted green, this house exhibits Craftsman influence in its design. The front facing gable roof has asphalt shingles; the foundation is concrete or concrete covered. The central entrance is flanked by a pair of windows to the east and a single window to the west. A full-fagade shed roof porch features stucco corner piers and pedestals framing the entrance bay with a closed stucco balustrade. A pair of 411 double -hung window sash are centered in the front facing gable. Angular brackets at the ends and center of the eaves exhibit the Craftsman influence in this house. Original l ight fixtures flank the main entrance. (C-1) 3. 608 E. McCarty St. (1915): The 2 -story Four Square house has a pyramidal hipped roof covered with asphalt shingles, a limestone foundation and red brick walls featuring dark mortar. A transom with segmental brick arch tops the entry door located to the west of the front fagade. The full -width front porch has a low hipped roof, denticulated cornice and three Doric columns set on brick pedestals with concrete caps. The porch also features a simple wood balustrade and two full -height engaged columns against the front of the house. Wide 111 double -hung sash are located east of the entry, with two similar wide windows on the second floor fagade. These upper windows have double rowlock segmental brick arches that are partially obstructed by the smooth wood cornice. (C-1) 4. 610 E. McCarty St. (1915): This 2 %2 -story duplex has a pyramidal hipped roof with asphalt shingles, red brick walls and a concrete foundation. A Four -Square type house, it has a flat -roofed 1 -story front porch with brick columns that extend above the roof to create a modern second floor terrace. The brick of the porch columns differs from the brick walls of the house, so may have replaced earlier columns, but these are still considered historic as they're likely over 50 years old. The porch has a solid brick railing and a concrete deck. There are double historic entries with transoms on the west of the front facade, with a wide 111 double -hung sash window topped by double rowlock segmental arch on the east side. On the second floor there is a blocked doorway on the right side and a 111 sash window on the east side, directly over the first floor window. The roof is decorated with a narrow denticulated cornice and a centrally located dormer window with a denticulated frieze and a pair of single light windows. A historic frame 2 - story sleeping porch is located at the rear. There is a shed at the rear of the house. A single car garage with a gable roof and corrugated metal siding with a carport wing extends to the east property line, and is contributing to the district. (C-2) 5. 612 E. McCarty St. (1893): A rectangular shaped 1 '/2 -story brick house with Queen Anne influences, a pyramidal hipped asphalt shingle roof and a limestone foundation. The brick walls are painted brown, and the walls have narrow mortar joints. The 1 -story porch is 58 the most distinctive feature, with a flat roof having a full wood entablature and denticulated cornice, supported by three Doric columns. The porch extends forward on the east side, with a simple wood balustrade that follows the roofline above. A steep gabled dormer faces front, with a round arched single light window and double rowlock segmental brick arch. More gable wall dormers are found on the side elevation. This house has a garden to the east, where 614 E. McCarty once stood. The lot is included in the historic district, so that the design guidelines will apply to any new construction. (C- 1) 6. Vacant lot adjacent to 612 E. McCarty St.. 7. 616 E. McCarty St. (1905): The Colonial Revival style influenced this 2%2 -story house, with its pyramidal hip roof covered in asphalt shingles, brick walls and concrete foundation. The nearly full -width front porch is at grade and has a wide frieze, dentilated cornice, three wood Doric columns and a turned wood balustrade. The entrance, located on the east side, has a transom. To the right of the entrance is a wide 1/1 double -hung sash window with a smooth concrete lintel. While the side windows have double rowlock segmental brick arches, there are no arches over the second floor front windows, or they are covered by the smooth wood cornice. The front facing gable has a central window that is blocked, surrounded by horizontal siding. (C-1) 8. 618 E. McCarty St. (1915): This Four -Square house is 2 %2 stories, having darker brick in a running bond with narrow white mortar joints on the front fagade. The side elevations are set in 7 course common bond, using brick of an orangish color with grey mortar. The nearly full -width front porch has a wide wood frieze, brick corner piers, pedestals framing the front entrance and a solid brick railing, all with concrete caps. The entry is located on the west side, by a short window. The east side has a wide 1/1 double -hung sash window. There are two 1/1 double -hung windows on the second floor with rock faced stone sills topped by a wood frieze. A hip roof dormer centered on the front fagade has a pair of 2 -light windows. A newer single car garage sided with horizontal siding, modern garage door and gutters is accessible from the alley in the rear. (C-1) 9. 620 E. McCarty St. (1915): A 2 -story Four Square house with brick 7 course common bond brick walls, the house has a pyramidal hip roof covered in asphalt shingles and a limestone foundation. The full -width front porch has painted brick corner piers, a slim support east of the entryway and a concrete deck one step above grade. Double entry doors on the west side of the front facade have a blind transom over the door furthest to the east. There is a wide 111 double -hung window on the left of the first floor. The second floor has two 1/1 double -hung windows with smooth stone lintels and rock -faced stone sills. Unlike other houses on this block, this house has wide overhanging eaves. A 2 -story frame porch at the rear has stairs to the enclosed second floor. (C-1) 59 10. 622 E. McCarty St. (1910): This 1 -story square pyramidal cottage has a pyramidal roof with asphalt shingles, red brick walls and a limestone foundation. The entrance is on the west side of the front facade, with a 1/1 double -hung window on the east, having a stone lintel and rock -faced sill. The central 1 -story porch covers the entry and window with a hip roof and dentil details on a wide cornice. The porch roof is supported by modern metal posts, with a concrete deck one step above grade and no railing. A gable roof dormer features wood shingles and a wide central 1 -light window. (C-1) 11.624 E. McCarty St. (1900): A 2 %2 -story multi -family structure with a hip roof and asphalt shingles, red brick walls and a limestone foundation. The largest structure in the district, this building has entrances in the second and fifth bays topped by 1 -light transoms and surrounded by "Classical Revival" fluted pilastered surrounds. The nearly full -facade 2 - story modern portico with plain wood posts is monumental in scale. All windows on the front fagade are 111 sash, on both the first and second floors, with smooth concrete lintels and sills. Second story windows line up with the first floor windows below. Two gable roof dormers feature fish -scale shingles, each having a round arched 1 -light window in the center. This highly visible building is on a corner lot at E. McCarty and Lafayette Streets. (C-1) 12.411 Lafayette St. (1910): One of three nearly identical Four -Square houses on the east side of the 400 block of Lafayette St., this square 2 %2 story brick house features a pyramidal hip roof with asphalt shingles and a limestone foundation. The hip roof has a dormer with a pair of 6 -light windows. The entrance is located on the south side, with a small elevated 1/1 sash further south. The wide 1/1 sash to the north has a broad lintel, topped by two evenly spaced 1/1 windows on the second level. The upper level windows are topped by a cornice and have rock -faced limestone sills. The wide cornice band is continuous. The 1 -story front porch has brick piers, slim Doric columns and a plain wood balustrade, with the space below enclosed in historic (square openings) lattice. This house is located adjacent to an alley on the south. (C-1) 13.409 Lafayette St. (19 10): Another Four -Square type 2 %2 -story brick house with a pyramidal hip roof, asphalt shingles and a limestone foundation. This is the middle house in a row of three nearly identical houses. Like 411 Lafayette, the entrance is off -center to the south with an elevated small 1/1 double -hung window at the south end. A broad lintel tops the wide 1/1 window to the north, with two evenly spaced 1/1 sash on the second floor. A central hipped dormer features a pair of 6 -light sash. The second floor windows are topped by the house's cornice line, and have rock -faced limestone sills. The original cornice has been removed. The 1 -story front porch has brick piers and a plain wood balustrade. (C-1) 14.407 Lafayette St., (19102 The third Four -Square type 2 %2 story brick house on this block has a pyramidal hit roof, asphalt shingles and a concrete faced foundation. The entrance is off -center to the south, with a small raised I/ I double hung window to the south end. A .rl, broad lintel tops the wide window to the north, with two evenly spaced 111 windows on the second floor. These second floor windows are topped by the wood cornice and have rock -faced limestone sill. The wood cornice is missing on most of the north and south side walls. The hip roof dormer has two single light windows. The nearly full -width 1 - story front porch has Doric columns with a plain raised wood balustrade. The area beneath the front porch is in -filled with wood vents on the front, with original lattice on the sides. (C-1) 15.408 Lafayette St. (1920) This 2 -story L-shaped Four Square brick house has a hip roof covered in asphalt shingles and a foundation parged with concrete. The brick walls have been painted white. The entry retains its original transom, located on the north side of the first floor. A hip roof porch extends part way across the front fagade and extends to the north of the house, with a single round column at the south end. The north end of the porch past the entrance has been enclosed with brick, having a single 2 -light window and a remnant of a brick porch pier incorporated into the brick enclosure wall. The porch has a concrete deck two steps from grade. The second level has two 111 sash below the wood frieze, both with stone sills. A tall dormer with hip roof has centered paired 111 sash, with decorative wood shingling on the sides. (C-1) 16.410 Lafayette St. (1885): A 1 %a -story brick Four Square type house, having a 1 -story flat roof porch supported by four round columns, wide wood frieze and a concrete deck two steps above grade. The entry retains its original transom, with a modern entry door with oval beveled glass light to the north side. A large 111 window with stone lintel and sill is to the south. The gabled front wall has two smaller 111 sash, with double rowlock segmental arches and wide rake boards. On the north elevation there is a projecting gable pavilion with 111 sash on each floor. (C-1) 17.412 Lafayette St. (1910) This 2 %z -story square brick Four Square type house used to have a 1 -story flat roof porch across the front, but this has been removed. A hip roof tops the house, with overhanging boxed eaves and a narrow wood frieze. The entry is located to the north with a 1 -light transom and a small 111 window further north, while a large 111 sash with stone lintel is located to the south side. The second story has two 111 sash windows, with rock -faced sills. The central hip roof dormer's window space has been in - filled with plywood and two ventilation louvers. (C-1) 18.623 School St., (1890) An open gable 1 -story brick house, which has a front gable roof covered with asphalt shingles and a parged concrete foundation. The brick walls were laid in a 5 -course common bond pattern. The wood 1 -light entry door is located to the east, with a large 111 sash to the west having a double rowlock segmental arch and rock - faced sill. The gable -roof front porch has two wood posts, aluminum sheathing in the gable, a concrete deck and steps. Two 111 sash on the first level have double rowlock segmental arches. (C-1) 1. 19. 621 School St.,(1905): This cross -plan 1 '/2 -story house features a cross gable roof covered by asphalt shingles and a stone foundation. The brick is in a 5 -course common bond pattern. The "T -plan" fagade has an entry on the east side, with an original corner entry on the east side of an in -filled projecting center gable pavilion. This pavilion has modern 8/8 sash that are smaller than the original opening, with double rowlock segmental arches above and rock -faced stone sills below. Small 6/6 sash are in the vertical sided gable. An L-shaped front porch has turned wood posts and modern iron brackets, a concrete floor and a narrow frieze board. (C-1) 20.617 School St., (1910): An L-shaped open gable house with brick walls, a front gable roof with asphalt shingles, this house has a parged concrete foundation. The walls were laid in a 5 -course common bond. The full -width shed roof porch is entirely enclosed by windows. There is a double aluminum entry at the east side, and the porch has a wide wood frieze. In the gable there is a 6/1 sash with aluminum sheathing on the gable and rake boards finishing the gable's edges. An attached modern garage is located on the northeast corner, having an overhead garage door. This house is located on the western end of the dead-end street. (C-1) 21.615 School St., 0 910): An open gable rectangular house with brick walls, this house has a complex gable style roof with asphalt shingles and a concrete parged foundation. Walls are laid in a 7 -course common bond. The entry door has multiple lights, is located off - center on the east end, with a 6/1 window on the far east end and an 8/1 sash west of the entry. Windows vary, with the 8/1 sash having a stone lintel and the 6/1 sash a double rowlock segmental arch, both with rock -faced stone sills. The porch has a hip roof and extends over the two west openings, supported by three wood columns, with an open wood railing, a wide wood frieze and a wood deck. The gable features 6/1 sash, clapboard siding and rake boards. This house is located on the north side of School St., at the dead end near Wears Creek. Prior to the creek being channelized by the Corps of Engineers, two other houses were located to the west of this house. (C-1) 22. 620 School St., (1915): A craftsman style house with random rock masonry walls, a gabled hip roof covered by asphalt shingles and a limestone foundation. The nearly full width front porch has a hip roof, smooth cornice, random rock piers and no balustrade. The gable front has returns on both the gable and the hip roof. In the upper story there is a 1/1 double hung sash. The windows have rock segmental arches at the top. The house is located at the west end of the south side of School St., adjacent to Wears Creek. According to Sanborn maps, there were two other houses here prior to the Corps of Engineers' project to contain the creek. (C-1) 23. 622 School St., (1905): This open gable rectangular house was built with masonry walls, a gable front roof with asphalt shingles and a concrete foundation. The walls were built of concrete block and stucco, with first floor walls of smooth elongated concrete block, having rock -faced concrete block quoins on all corners and a stucco finish on the upper 62 level. There is a modern door in the central entrance bay, flanked on either side by 1/1 double -hung sash covered by a central hipped roof 1 -story porch. There are brick piers with an open pattern closed concrete railing, with concrete pedestals flanking the entrance to the porch. There are a pair of 1/1 double -hung sash in the upper story, with a plain flat wood surround and a modern metal awning. A gable roof dormer features exposed end rafters and a 1/1 double -hung sash located off -center on the right side of the west elevation. (C-1) 24.624 School St., (1910): A duplex, 2 %2 stories tall with a gable front roof and asphalt shingles, brick walls on a limestone foundation. The brick walls were laid in a 7 -course common bond. Two entrances on the east side of the first floor have segmentally arched transoms, a wide 111 sash to the west, under a low hipped roof porch that extends nearly full -width. A smooth cornice and modern iron posts and rails are found on the porch. On the second floor are two windows, a narrow window is centered the entrance below and a wide 1/1 double -hung sash over a similar window below. The gable front features pressed metal siding with a diamond design and 2/2 double -hung sash with a plain wood surround. The house has three chimneys, an interior end chimney on the west side 24/and two interior end chimneys on the east elevation. (C-1) 25.626 School St., (1900): A I %2 -story brick house with a cross gable roof, asphalt shingles and a concrete foundation. The brick is laid in a 7 -course common bond, and the house has a T -plan shape. The main entry is located on the east side of the front elevation, in the reentrant angle, with modern doors and a transom facing the north and east. The projecting front gable pavilion has a wide 1/1 double -hung sash on the lower level and a short 1/1 in the upper half story, with artificially sided gables. The low full fagade hipped roof porch has an L -plan, tapered masonry piers with stone caps, a plain wood balustrade and a wooden porch floor. (C-1) 26.628 School St., (1915) The rectangular Four -Square 2 %2 -story house has a hip roof covered by asphalt shingles and a concrete foundation. This house is similar to the three on the east side of the 400 block of Lafayette Street. The front wall was built with running bond brick, while the side elevations are laid in a 7 -course common bond pattern. The house has a hip roof roof with a low pitch, located on the left side, brick piers and a closed brick railing with stone caps. Modern tiles cover the porch floor. The entrance door has an oval glass and a transom above, with a short 1/1 raised double -hung sash located on the left. A wide 1/1 sash is on the right with a white painted lintel. The second floor has two 1/1 double -hung sash placed symmetrically, topped by modern fiberglass awning. Modern materials cover the soffits and cornices on the house and porch, with the cornice on the house returning slightly on the side elevations. A hip roof dormer centered on the front facade has two fixed sash. Sanborn maps indicate that this house, as well as most of the others on the south side of the street, had garages accessible from E. Miller Street. None of these garages remain today. (C-1) 63 27. 630 School St., 0 905): This 2 -story brick and frame house features a cross gable roof covered in asphalt shingles and a concrete foundation. The first story walls are brick, with aluminum siding on the second floor. Brickwork suggests the second story may have been added after initial construction. The full -width front porch has three brick piers, an open brick railing and pedestal, all with caps. The porch features a new ceramic tile floor. The second story has a pair of 111 sash with wood surrounds, all slightly off -center. (C-1) 28. 500 Lafayette St., (1900): An L -plan 1 %-story house that has a projecting gable bay on the south. The entry on the north side is adjacent to the projecting bay, with the transom area in -filled with brick. The pair of 111 sash on the north are small,in-filled sliders, the centered pair of 111 sash on the projecting gable bay are in an in -filled area. Both windows retain the original segmental brick arch above the replacement sash and have header brick sills. The gable features rake boards, cornice returns and original l -light sash with rock -faced stone sill and a segmental brick arch. A short chimney is located on the ridge, almost above the entrance. There is no porch, but a modern concrete stoop with a handicap ramp and elevated walkway leading north along the front fagade. A large wood shingled addition is located at the rear, or west elevation. (C-1) 64 School Street Historic District Map Base 'Fio'od Elevation568 q� Cie !N � o - I . ,I,+ . 'A ILI I S. gy4 ' v ' v mill Photo # 19: 617 School St. Photo # 21: 620 School St. Photo # 23: 624 School St. Photo # 20: 615 School St. Photo # 22: 622 School St. Photo # 24: 626 School St. m Photo # 25: 628 School St. Photo #27: 500 Lafayette St. Photo # 26: 630 School St. 70 School Street local Historic District Design Guidelines NOTE: These Design Guidelines only apply to exterior changes to houses in the School Street Local Historic District. I. Guidelines for Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings The guidelines shall apply to exterior rehabilitation work only. A. General Objectives 1. Rehabilitation work should maintain and be consistent with the historic architectural styles, date/period and detailing of the structure. 2. Rehabilitation work which is intended to enhance or return the structure to its original historic appearance should be based upon historic, physical, or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural designs. Work that has no historical basis and which seeks to create a different appearance is discouraged. 3. Work should first attempt to repair and maintain the existing elements of the structure, whenever reasonably possible. In the event replacement of details and materials is necessary, when possible, these elements should match the elements being replaced in size, shape, materials, pattern, texture and directional orientation of installation. B. Building Wall Material Requirements 1. Existing wall materials and details shall be retained through repair and maintenance, unless deteriorated beyond reasonable repair. 2. When replacement of existing materials and details is required, the new materials shall be similar in appearance, maintaining the original materials in size, shape, pattern, texture and directional orientation on installation. 3. Masonry walls shall maintain their present or original appearance. Paint may be removed from masonry surfaces to return to the original appearance. The painting of, or the removal of paint, from a masonry surface shall be done only if necessary to preserve deteriorating masonry surfaces and the historic integrity of the structure. To 1 71 prevent damage, masonry shall be cleaned by the gentlest means possible. Abrasive cleaning methods, such as sandblasting using sand, shall be avoided. 4. The use of steel, aluminum, manufactured board or vinyl siding as a replacement material for primary walls is discouraged, but may be acceptable if these materials maintain the character of the structure and the original siding shape, pattern, texture and directional orientation. Character defining details and elements such as, but not limited to, window/door trim and detailing, eave brackets, porch columns and railings, and other special elements and details which give the structure its character and appearance, shall be retained when applying steel, aluminum, or vinyl siding. Rear additions, which are often covered with a different siding than the primary structure's walls, should use a replacement siding that most closely maintains the character of the structure and the original siding shape, pattern, texture and directional orientation. Character defining details should be retained when removing or applying siding materials. C. Requirements for Windows and Doors 1. Existing windows and doors, their glazing, trim, and the character defining elements shall be retained through repair when reasonably possible. 2. Existing window and door locations shall be retained, not removed, covered or filled in, unless necessary for flood -proofing a structure. 3. Repair of original windows and doors is the preferred option in this historic district. Replacement windows and doors shall be similar in sash design and appearance, maintaining the original size, shape, muntin pattern and size, glazing area and tint, and placement location. Windows and doors on a wall facing a street shall be the primary consideration in review of building permit applications, and shall most closely replicate the originals. Vinyl, vinyl wrapped, or other lower quality windows and doors on walls facing a street shall be discouraged. Windows and doors on rear additions or on walls not facing a street shall maintain the original size, shape, muntin pattern, glazing area and tint, but may be of a different material than the originals (ex.: vinyl wrapped or metal windows may be allowed). 4. Replacement windows having thermal and maintenance reducing qualities may be used, but shall maintain those appearance and character defining elements described above. Ex: laminated glass with a clear low -E coating or double pane windows may be used. N 72 5. New window and door openings shall maintain the building's facade proportions and rhythms, and shall match the existing window and door design. Where the building code requires egress, larger windows may replace original small windows so long as they are compatible in style with the original windows. Every effort, however, shall be made to place replacement egress windows on secondary or rear elevations. 6. Replacement trim materials shall be similar in appearance, maintaining the original materials' size, shape, pattern, texture and detailing. 7. Window features and accessories, such as storm windows, screens, awnings, and shutters shall maintain the appearance of the main window and the building's facade proportions and rhythms. 8. Door features and accessories, such as storm doors, screens, sidelights, and transoms shall maintain the appearance of the main door and the building's facade proportions and rhythms. Original transoms and sidelights may not be covered or boarded. D. Requirements for Roofs 1. Roof forms and architectural features such as, but not limited to, dormers, chimneys, overhangs, eaves, eave brackets or lookouts, and fascia, which give the roof its essential character, shall be retained through repair when reasonably possible. 2. Replacement materials shall maintain the original materials' size, shape, pattern, texture and directional orientation of installation when reasonable possible. If a roof has standard tab asphalt shingles, the same type of replacement shingles should be used. If architectural shingles have been used on a roof, architectural shingles may be used as a replacement, even if this would not have been the original roof style. E. Requirements for Porches 1. Existing porches and their architectural elements such as, but not limited to railings, columns, brackets and steps shall be retained through repair. Addition of wood epoxy to make small repairs to damaged elements shall be allowed. Wooden porch elements shall be painted. 2. Should one or more of these elements be deteriorated enough to warrant replacement, replacement materials shall maintain the original materials' size, shape, pattern, texture and directional orientation or installation. Treated wood may be used for replacement of porch elements, but must be painted after being allowed to weather for a period of at least six months, not exceeding 12 months. 3 73 F. Requirements for Engineering Systems: Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing 1. Engineering systems and their associated elements such as, but not limited to, air conditioning and heating units, flues, conduits, cables, electrical boxes, meters, ventilators, and lovers shall, when feasible, be placed on the side or rear facades of the structure. II. Guidelines for Additions to Existing Structures A. General Objectives 1. Additions should be located on side or rear facades where the character defining elements and visual appearance of the front facade of the structure will not be obscured, damaged or destroyed, when reasonably possible. 2. Additions to existing structures that are visible from the street should maintain and not detract from the appearance and character defining elements of the existing structure, their scale and proportions. 3. Additions should provide consistency and continuity through the use of similar forms, massing, rhythms, details, height, directional orientation of building, element lines and materials. 4. Vertical additions should maintain the established height of the structures along the same street. These additions shall maintain the established rhythms and proportions that are established by the lower portions of the structure and shall maintain the structure's architectural integrity. 5. If possible, additions should be designed so that they can be removed in the future without damaging the existing building. B. Building Site Requirements 1. Additions shall maintain the building setbacks from the street and for side yards as defined by the other buildings along the same streets. When the setback pattern varies, the addition shall be maintained between the minimum and maximum setbacks that are defined by the other buildings along the same side of the street, established as follows: (a) Front yard setbacks shall be established by averaging the existing front yards along the street frontage in the same block and on the same side of the street; (b) Side and rear yard setbacks shall be as required by the Zoning Code. 4 74 2. Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 3 below, paving within the front yard shall be limited to primary driveways and sidewalks. The surface area of driveways and sidewalks shall not exceed 30% of the front yard lot area. Parking areas shall be located behind the front plane of the building in the side or rear yard or inner courtyards, except as provided for allowable parking lots as described in this section. 3. Allowable parking lots for land uses requiring ten (10) or more spaces may be located in the front yard provided the parking lot is a minimum of 30 feet from the front property/right-of-way line. Parking lots shall be screened from view along the front and side property lines with a perimeter strip containing a combination of medium - to -large canopy (deciduous) trees and evergreen trees, planted three (3) trees per 100 linear feet; plus a barrier feature such as a hedge, berm, fence, wall or combination of such features, with minimum height of three (3) feet. Up to ten percent (10%) of the length of a screen may be interrupted for access to the property, however, at least one driveway access shall be permitted for each development. All plants shall be selected from the Approved Planting List, on file in the Department of Planning and Code Enforcement. Parking lot design and landscaping shall comply with the provisions of the Zoning Code. 4. Addition of landscaping features such as, but not limited to, walls, fencing, lighting and planters shall be consistent with the appearance and general character of those same elements that exist along the same street and neighborhood. C. Requirements for Building Materials and Elements 1. Building materials shall create a visual consistency and continuity between the existing structure and the addition. This may be achieved, first, through the continued use of materials that are present on the existing structure or, secondly, through the use of different materials that maintain the same scale, proportions, rhythms, and directional orientation as those present on the existing structure. 2. Building elements, their location, and the sight lines that they establish shall be continued to the addition to create a visual consistency and continuity. This may be achieved through maintaining such elements, details and building lines as the established height of windows and doors, the repetition of window glazing patterns, the continuance of the roof forms, eave lines and overhangs, the continuance of special detailing present on the existing structure. 3. Design the foundation height and the eave lines of additions generally to align with those of the existing buildings, unless elevation of a structure is required for flood - 5 75 proofing. Interior floor -to -ceiling heights on the front elevation shall not be less than nine (9) feet, with a maximum story height of 12 feet. Additions to front facades shall have the appearance of having no more than two and one-half (2-1/2) stories and be limited to 35 feet in height. Where front setbacks greater than 35 feet are possible, the differential height. 4. For the purposes of this section, "building height" shall be the vertical distance from the grade within 10 feet of a building to the (a) highest point of a flat roof; (b) the dock line of a mansard roof; or (c) the average height between eaves and ridge for gable, hip, and gambrel roofs, as averaged from around the building. D. Requirements for Roofs 1. New roof features, such as dormers, may be added to the existing roof, if such elements maintain the structure's established rhythms, scale, proportions, and architectural appearance and character. 2. Roof forms on additions shall maintain ' the existing structure's appearance and character through similar roof forms, slope and detailing. E. Requirements for Porches 1. Enclosure of porches and entries shall maintain the structure's existing rhythms, scale, proportions, appearance and character. 2. When required to achieve access to the first floor level, handicapped ramps may be installed and shall be constructed so that in the future, the ramp may be removed without significantly altering the original structure. III. Guidelines for New Construction A. General Objectives 1. Designs for new construction need not duplicate existing styles within a district, but should draw upon common characteristics of structures in the approximate neighborhood to provide a continuity and consistency. Characteristics, such as, but not limited to, porches, entries, roof slope and form, and window/door styles, maintain the continuity and consistency of new construction within the district. 2. New construction should respect the established area's scale, proportions, rhythms, and relationships of both principal and accessory structures. 76 B. Building Site Requirements 1. Keep the orientation of the proposed building's front elevation to the street consistent with the orientation of existing buildings' front elevation to the street. 2. New secondary structures, such as detached garages, shall maintain the secondary relationship with the primary structure. 3. Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 4 below, paving within the front yard shall be limited to primary driveways and sidewalks. The surface of driveways and sidewalks shall not exceed 30% of the front yard lot area. Locate new parking areas as unobtrusively as possible behind the front plane of the building in the side or rear yard or inner courtyards, except as provided for allowable parking lots as described in this section. 4. Allowable parking lots for land uses requiring ten (10) or more spaces maybe located in the front yard provided the parking lot is a minimum of 30 feet from the front property/right-of-way line and is screened from view along the front and side property lines with a perimeter strip containing a combination of medium -to -large canopy (deciduous) trees and evergreen trees, planted three (3) trees per 100 linear feet; plus a barrier feature such as a hedge, berm, fence, wall or combination of such features, with minimum height of three (3) feet. Up to ten percent (10%) of the length of a screen may be interrupted for access to the property, however, at least one driveway access shall be permitted for each development. All plants shall be selected from the Approved Planting List, on file in the Department of Planning and Code Enforcement. Parking lot design and landscaping shall comply with the provisions of the Zoning Code. S. Use driveways and alleys to access side and rear parking areas and garages. Attached garages shall not be located on the front facade of a new building unless incorporated into the mass of the building, with the garage doors oriented to the side or rear. "Snout houses" where a garage projects form the front facade shall not be permitted. 6. For new parking areas, use paving material that is compatible with traditional paving materials for driveways in the district. Parking areas and driveways shall be designed in accordance with standards of the Department of Public Works. Acceptable paving materials include pavers, concrete, textured -concrete, aggregate, asphalt, and other paving material approved by the Department of Public works. Gravel shall not be utilized. 7 77 7. Existing large trees and other significant landscape features shall be incorporated into places for additions and new construction. Where existing trees and other significant landscape features cannot be retained, new trees and landscape features shall be incorporated into the plans and installed on the site. Outside of parking lot landscape areas, trees used to replace existing trees which must be removed shall have a minimum diameter/caliper of one and one-half inches (1-1/2") measured six inches (6") above the ground., 8. Existing historic site features such as retaining walls, gate posts and tree guards shall be retained, replaced in kind, or similar features incorporated in the design. 9. New landscaping features such as, but not limited to, walls, fencing, lighting, and planters, shall be consistent with the general character of those same elements that exist along the same street and approximate neighborhood. C. Requirements for Building Materials 1. Design the height of the proposed building to be compatible with the height of existing buildings in the School Street Historic District. Minimum setbacks for new construction shall be established by averaging the existing front yards along the street frontage in the same block and on the same side of the street; (b) Side and rear yards shall be as required by the Zoning Code. (a) Interior floor -to -ceiling heights on the front elevation shall not be less than nine (9) feet, with a maximum story height of 12 feet. (b) Except as provided in the Differential Height/Setback Schedule, new buildings constructed shall have the appearance from the front street line, of having no more than two and one-half (2-1/2) stories, and be limited to 35 feet in overall height. 2. Design the proportion (the ratio of the height to the width) of the proposed building's front elevation to be compatible with the proportion of existing front elevations in the district. 3. Utilize new windows and doors that are compatible in proportion, shape, position, location, pattern, and size with windows and doors of existing structures in the district. On the facades visible from the front street line, individual window units shall not exceed 48 inches. Compatible groupings of double hung windows are acceptable. The separation between individual windows in these groupings shall not be less than four (4) inches. Use of more than three (3) single window units in a grouping is not appropriate. New windows shall follow the traditional proportion of being taller than they are wide. 78 4. Keep the roof shape of the proposed building consistent with roof shapes in the district: gable and hip. Roof pitch shall be consistent with other existing structures in the district. 5. Keep the predominant material of the proposed building consistent with historic materials in the district: brick, stone, stucco, and wooden clapboard siding. Use of synthetic materials is discouraged, however synthetic materials may be substituted for historic materials if approved on a case by case basis. Synthetic materials shall be specifically identified and approved on an individual basis by the Department of Planning and Code Enforcement. 6. Make the scale (the relationship of a building's mass and details to the human figure) of the proposed building compatible with the scale of existing structures in the district. 7. Ensure that the architectural details of the proposed building complement the architectural details of existing structures in the district. 8. Contemporary construction that does not directly copy from historic buildings in the district but is compatible with them in height, proportion, roof shape, material, texture, scale, detail, and color, is strongly encouraged. 9. New single family structures shall maintain the traditional neighborhood scale. 10. New non -single family structures shall (a) include architectural details on the building facades visible from the street which complement the existing residential architecture in the district; and (b) shall be divided into smaller modules that are similar in size and scale to traditional single family houses in the district. 11. New non -single family structures with front building facades of 100 feet or more in width which are parallel with E. McCarty and Lafayette Streets or within 30 degrees of being parallel with this street shall incorporate the following design detail into the front building facades: (a) each module width shall not exceed 20 percent (20%) of the width of the front facade, and (b) each module shall be off -set from the front facade a minimum of five percent (5%) of the total width of the facade. 12. For the purposes of this section, "building height" shall be the vertical distance from the grade within ten (10) feet of the building to the (a) highest point of a flat roof; (b) the dock line of a mansard roof; or (c) the average height between eaves and ridge for gable, hip, and gambrel roofs, as averaged from around the building. E 79 City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101 Carrie Terpin, Mayor Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director Phone: 573-634.6410 Fax: 573-634.6457 May 31, 2018 Dear Property Owner: This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15 p.m. on Thursday, June 14, 2018 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, to consider the following matter: (this letter is being mailed to you because you own property within the proposed historic district area) Case No. P18014 -Creation of the School Street Local Historic District. Request filed by Jenny Smith, lead applicant, and 21 other property owners within the proposed district for the following: 1. Creation and designation of the School Street Local Historic District for an area containing 28 property parcels and consisting of approximately 4 acres. 2. Enactment of design guidelines for properties within the district, including regulations requiring review and approval of new buildings and building modifications by the Historic Preservation Commission. The proposed historic district is generally located south of East McCarty Street, east of Wears Creek, north of Highway 50163, and on Lafayette Street frontage. Maps of the proposed historic district area and proposed design guidelines are available on the Planning and Zoning Commission website at: www.jeffersoncitymo.gov and are on file at the Department of Planning and Protective Services and available for review during regular business hours. This case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council on July 16, 2018. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street. Written comments may be directed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways: e-mail: jcplanning@jeffcitymo.org fax: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services I Planning Division 573-634-6457 mail: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to provide written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission Chairman only at the meeting. Correspondence received after 1:00 p.m. will be included in the official record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact us at 573.634.6475. Sincerely, �,-Z L Al;.� Eric Barron, AICP Planning Manager Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Property Owner List Within Buffer Area Case No. P18014 School Street Historic District SMITH, JENNY M & TONY P HARRISON, WINN F & MARY K 1211 ELMERINE AVE 708 E HIGH ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 612 E MCCARTY ST 411 LAFAYETTE ST SMITH, TONY P & JENNY M BONNER, GLENN M 1211 ELMERINE AVE 628 SCHOOL ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 614 E MCCARTY ST 628 SCHOOL ST PATTERSON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT L L C ROSS, WILLIAM A JR PO BOX 185 C/O AUDWIN L ROSS, TRUSTEE JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65102 1804 VAN BUREN AVE 630 SCHOOL ST CHARLOTTE, NC 28216 S& P MANAGEMENT L L C 500 LAFAYETTE ST CITY OF JEFFERSON HARRIS, BRANDI 320 E MCCARTY ST WHITE, BETH A JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 KUSCHEL, MICHAEL J 606 E MCCARTY ST 128 MIDWAY LN WESTPHALIA, MO 65085 GORMAN.. MICHAEL J & CYNTHIA A 616 E MCCARTY ST 305 CREST AVE HOLTS SUMMIT, MO 65043-4721 DINOLFO, STEVEN H & R KAY 608 E MCCARTY ST 1302 ROSEVIEW DR JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 SIEBENECK, MARY JANE 618 E MCCARTY ST 610 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 TEJAN, MARIATU A 610 E MCCARTY ST 815 WESTERN AIR DR JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 CITY OF JEFFERSON 620 E MCCARTY ST PARKS & REC COMMISSION 320 E MCCARTY ST CASTILLO, LISA JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 3249 FROG HOLLOW RD 602 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 615 SCHOOL ST HUNT, JERICA 626 SCHOOL ST RHODES, WALTER & LAVERNE R JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 2618 SCHOTT RD 626 SCHOOL ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 622 E MCCARTY ST S& P MANAGEMENT L L C 547 HWY 89 S HARRIS, BRANDI LINN, MO 65051 621 SCHOOL ST 409 LAFAYETTE ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 621 SCHOOL ST Page 1 June 14, 2018 81 Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Property Owner List Within Buffer Area Case No. P18014 School Street Historic District CITY OF JEFFERSON H& H GLOBAL INVESTMENTS L L C CITY COUNSELORS OFFICE 900 MADISON ST C/O PARKS & REC COMMISSION JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 320 E MCCARTY ST 624 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 623 SCHOOL ST CITY OF JEFFERSON 320 E MCCARTY ST HARRISON, WINN & MARY JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 1916 STATE ROAD 00 408 LAFAYETTE ST HOLTS SUMMIT, MO 65043 620 SCHOOL ST CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY COUNSELORS OFFICE C/O PARKS & RECS COMMISSION 320 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 410 LAFAYETTE ST E P B ENTERPRISES L L C 206 E FRANKLIN ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 622 SCHOOL ST ESTATE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC 3609 SHAMROCK RD JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 407 LAFAYETTE ST HAYES, HUGH BRIAN & SABRA L 2100 TANNER BRIDGE RD JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 412 LAFAYETTE ST CASTILLO, LISA 3244 FROG HOLLOW RD JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 624 SCHOOL ST CASTILLO, LISA 3249 FROG HOLLOW RD JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 617 SCHOOL ST Page 2 June 14, 2018 82 City of Jefferson Department of Planning 8 Protective Services 320 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101 May 31, 2018 Dear Property Owner: Carrie Tergin, Mayor Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director Phone: 573-634-6410 Fax: 573-634-6457 This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15 p.m. on Thursday, June 14, 2018 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, to consider the following matter: (this letter is being mailed to you because you own property located within 185 feet of the proposed historic district) Case No. P18014 —Creation of the School Street Local Historic District. Request filed by Jenny Smith, lead applicant, and 21 other property owners within the proposed district for the following: 1. Creation and designation of the School Street Local Historic District for an area containing 28 property parcels and consisting of approximately 4 acres. 2. Enactment of design guidelines for properties within the district, including regulations requiring review and approval of new buildings and building modifications by the Historic Preservation Commission. The proposed historic district is generally located south of East McCarty Street, east of Wears Creek, north of Highway 50/63, and on Lafayette Street frontage. Maps of the proposed historic district area and proposed design guidelines are available on the Planning and Zoning Commission website at: www.jeffersoncitymo.gov and are on file at the Department of Planning and Protective Services and available for review during regular business hours. This case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council on July 16, 2018. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street. Written comments may be directed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways: e-mail: jcplanning@jeffcitymo.org fax: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division 573-634-6457 mail: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to provide written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission Chairman only at the meeting. Correspondence received after 1:00 p.m. will be included in the official record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact us at 573.634.6475. Sincerely, Eric Barron, AICP Planning Manager Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. 83 Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Property Owner List Outside Buffer Area Case No. P18014 School Street Historic District STEWARD, LINDA L 708 E MILLER ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 708 E MILLER ST HARRISON, WINN F & MARY K 708 E HIGH ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 709 E HANDLEY WAY BROWN, KENT L & PAULA M 621 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 621 E MCCARTY ST UNIT A DISTLER, JOE CONNER, SALLY 34420 H WY T CALIFORNIA, MO 65018 715 E MILLER ST ARKINVEST LLC 305 RED TAIL DR ASHLAND, MO 65010 312 MARSHALL ST HEISE, DAVID 320 MARSHALL ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 320 MARSHALL ST DODSON, DANIEL 315 MARSHALL ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 315 MARSHALL ST LOCH INDUSTRIES INC 314 LAFAYETTE ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 608 E WALL WAY C& K INVESTENT VENTURES L L C 11744 MILBROOKE RD RUSSELLVILLE, MO 65074 601 E MCCARTY ST A BROWN, KENT L & PAULA 621 E MCCARTY ST, STE A JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 609 E MCCARTY ST H& H GLOBAL INVESTMENTS L L C 900 MADISON ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 613 E MCCARTY ST H& H GLOBAL INVESTMENTS L L C 900 MADISON ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 617 E MCCARTY ST BROWN, KENT L & PAULA M 621 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 620 E WALL WAY HUBBLE PROPERTIES L L C C/O HUBBLE, DARRYL & CONNIE 628 E HIGH ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 310 LAFAYETTE ST LOCH INDUSTRIES INC 314 LAFAYETTE ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 314 LAFAYETTE ST MOELLER, WILLIAM A & STORMI L 5806 HERITAGE HWY JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 712 E MCCARTY ST DEGRACE, THOMAS 900 MONTANA ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 413 MARSHALL ST SMITH, MONICA LYNN 415 MARSHALL ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 415 MARSHALL ST Page 1 June 14, 2018 84 Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Property Owner List Outside Buffer Area Case No. P18014 School Street Historic District I& R INVESTMENTS L L C 5804 STERLING RDG JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 711 E MCCARTY ST CARVER, BERNARD P & KAROLYN M 3609 SHAMROCK RD JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 700 E MCCARTY ST NEW VISIONS INVESTMENTS L L C PO BOX 104656 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65110-4656 501 MARSHALL ST MOFFAT, RICHARD H & MELANIE G 708 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 708 E MCCARTY ST LARA, JOSE LUIS RUGELIO 710 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 710 E MCCARTY ST WALDON, TAHTIANA & LANE, CHRISTOPHER M 419 MARSHALL ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 419 MARSHALL ST CITY OF JEFFERSON PARK & REC COMMISSION 1299 LAFAYETTE ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101-3562 SCHOOL ST PATTERSON, KEITH D 3608 RT C JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 713 E MILLER ST CRAWFORD, JOYCE I & EARNEST L 706 E MILLER ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 706 E MILLER ST LOGAN, HELEN 608 E MILLER ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 608 E MILLER ST MESSER, KERRY K & LYNN M PO BOX 1288 FESTUS, MO 65028 718 E MCCARTY ST Page 2 June 14, 2018 G P M PROPERTY INVESTMENTS L L C PO BOX 104325 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65110 716 E MCCARTY ST HEINRICH, MARVIN L 310 MARSHALL ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 310 MARSHALL ST JEFFERSON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 315 E DUNKLIN ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 501 E MILLER ST DODSON, DANIEL 315 MARSHALL ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 311 MARSHALL ST TURNER, LISA 2401 AIELLO LN JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109-8848 317 MARSHALL ST BRITT, BEWEY MILTON 905 JUSTUS ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 605 E MCCARTY ST CITY OF JEFFERSON 320 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 600 E MCCARTY ST 85 Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Property Owner List Outside Buffer Area Case No. P18014 School Street Historic District H& H GLOBAL INVESTMENTS L L C LINCOLN UNIVERSITY 900 MADISON ST BOARD OF CURATORS JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 820 CHESTNUT ST 619 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 DERBY LEASING INC 635 E DUNKLIN ST MACK, YVONNE 612 E MILLER ST LINCOLN UNIVERSITY JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 BOARD OF CURATORS 612 E MILLER ST 820 CHESTNUT ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 ROMAN, JAY A E DUNKLIN ST 409 MARSHALL ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 1& R INVESTMENTS L L C 409 MARSHALL ST 5804 STERLING RDG JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 LOVE, JOAN 311 LAFAYETTE ST 232 BOONVILLE RD JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 1& R INVESTMENTS L L C 411 MARSHALL ST 5804 STERLING RDG JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 NEW VISIONS INVESTMENTS L L C 315 LAFAYETTE ST PO BOX 104656 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65110-4656 1& R INVESTMENTS L L C 421 MARSHALL ST 5804 STERLING RDG JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 CITY OF JEFFERSON 323 LAFAYETTE ST PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION 320 E MCCARTY ST I& R INVESTMENTS L L C JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 5804 STERLING RDG SCHOOL ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 707 E MCCARTY ST DRIVER, CLARENCE A & RUBY K (D/C) Page 3 June 14, 2018 706 E HANDLEY WAY QUINN CHAPEL AFRICAN METHODIST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 EPISCOPAL CHURCH -JEFFERSON CITY 706 E HANDLEY WAY 529 LAFAYETTE ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 DERBY LEASING INC 419 LAFAYETTE ST C/O JON BEETEM PO BOX 476 STATE OF MISSOURI JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65102 HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION COMM 406 CHERRY ST PO BOX 718 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65102 ALTHEUSER, GERALD B 529 LAFAYETTE ST 12542 COUNTRY VIEW TEBBETS, MO 65080 712 E HANDLEY WAY :. Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 Property Owner List Outside Buffer Area Case No. P18014 School Street Historic District June 14, 2018 CITY OF JEFFERSON PARK & REC COMMISSION 1299 LAFAYETTE ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101-3562 620 E MILLER ST REAR MOFFAT, RICHARD H & MELANIE G 708 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 501 LAFAYETTE ST :A PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED Case No. P18014 School Street Historic District June 14, 2018 Sender Senders Address How Received Date Received Phil Freeman, Chair, Old Town Revitalization Co. Email 5!1!2018 � Old 'down Revitalization Company Jefferson City, MO May 1, 2018 Jayme Abbott Neighborhood Services Manager City of Jefferson 320 E. McCarty St Jefferson City, MO 65101 Ms. Abbott, During our recent meeting, The Old Town Revitalization Company discussed the proposed local historic district that will be coming before the Historic Preservation Commission on May 1, 2018. Old Town Revitalization Company is concerned that the proposed historic district for the School Street area may impose requirements that discourage the rehabilitation of homes. Old Town Revitalization Company supports the formation of historic districts we want to ensure the ordinance will promote the redevelopment and renovation of properties. We encourage the City and Historic Jefferson City to work with the existing property owners to ensure they are aware of the proposed requirements. Please express our concerns to the Commission prior to their meeting. Thank you. Phil Freeman Chair Old Town Revitalization Company M. Jefferson City Planning &Zoning Commission June 14, 2018 Case No. P18015 Lage, LLC 1050 S. Country Club Drive Final Subdivision Plat Turtle Creek Subdivision, Section Two PLANNING STAFF REPORT JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 14,2018 Case No. P18015 — 1050 South Country Club Drive, Final Subdivision Plat of Turtle Creek Subdivision, Section Two. Request filed by Lage LLC, property owner, for a Final Subdivision Plat of 16.02 acres consisting of 41 lots. The property is zoned RS -2 Single Family Residential and is located on the west side of South Country Club Drive 350 feet north of Old Lohman Road and is described as part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8 and part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, Jefferson City, Missouri (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). Description of Proposal This proposal is for the approval of a Final Subdivision Plat (consisting of 16.02 acres). The property is zoned RS -2 and is intended to be the final phase of the Turtle Creek development. This last phase consists of 16.02 acres. Final Plat The final Subdivision Plat details the street layout and lot layout of the proposed Turtle Creek Subdivision Section Two. Acreage: The total size of section two is 16.02 acres. Number of Lots: 41 lots are shown on the final plat. Lot Sizes: The typical lot is shown with a lot size of 10,000 sf, which is the minimum lot size of the RS -2 district. All lots meet minimum width (80') and area (10,000 sq. ft.) requirements of the RS -2 district. All corner lots exceed the required 12,000 sf size. Streets: The Final Plat shows three streets ending with cul-de-sac bulbs. Right-of-way extensions to the property line are shown on two of the streets, which would allow for future connectivity to neighboring property. Street names are identified on the plat and do not conflict with current street names in the Jefferson City urban area. Parking is designated on one side of each street. Sidewalks: Sidewalks are required on one side of all streets. Sidewalks are shown on the north side of Tanman Court and the east side of Ronan Court and Ryder Court. Utilities: All lots are shown with access to water lines, sanitary sewer lines, underground electric lines, and telephone lines, and gas. Fire Hydrants are required to meet the minimum spacing of 600 feet and Street Lights are required to meet the minimum spacing of 250 feet. Notable Lots: Lots 40-47 are notable due to them being subject to the riparian corridor. They are to be slab homes only. A sewer line with 15' wide easement traverses the lots and the rear 60' of the lots is subject to a stream setback. Lots 75 and 80 are flag lots, which are created through a minor rearrangement of lot lines (From the Preliminary Plat); both lots meet the required 35 feet of width for the flagpole portion of the lot. Reserved Tract B consisting of .05 acres is to be transferred to the owners of Lot 20 of the first section to resolve a setback issue. Lot 48 is dedicated to the City of Jefferson for the maintenance of a storm water quality basin. Staff Recommendation The Final Subdivision Plat meets the requirements for subdivision plats as outlined within the Subdivision Code. The street network provides for future connectivity options to neighboring properties. Staff recommends approval of the plat documents subject to correction of minor technical details identified by city staff. Form of Motion 1. Approval of the Final Subdivision Plat of Turtle Creek Subdivision Section Two subject to comments and technical corrections of the Planning and Engineering Divisions. Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Engineering Division Staff Report Thursday, June 14, 2018, 5:15pm Item 7. — Other New Business Case No. P18015 — Final Subdivision Plat, Turtle Creek Subdivision Section Two, 1050 South Country Club Drive (RS -2) ENGINEERING STAFF RECOMMENDATION - Recommend approval, subject to any technical corrections being addressed prior to the plat being considered by the City Council. Existing Infrastructure Summary • Public infrastructure exists in the vicinity. • Storm water facilities exist in the vicinity. • The entire watershed drains to the creek adjacent to this property. • An existing 12" diameter clay tile trunk line sewer main is located on the property running parallel with the creek. • South Country Club Drive is an existing curb and guttered arterial roadway, no parking allowed. • Sidewalks have been/ are being installed in Section One of the subdivision. Improvements Summary Roadway • Tanman Court is planned with a 33' width, 60' r/w which allows parking on one (1) side of the street; designed as a lane -court, with twenty (20) — fifty (50) units, with an ADT(average daily traffic) of 200-500 vehicles a day. • A permanent cul-de-sac is planned at the end of Tanman Court. A future roadway connection could be made as designed without removal of the cul-de-sac bulb. • Ronan Court and Ryder Court are planned with a 28' width, 50' r/w which allows parking on one (1) side of the street; designed as a place -court, with twenty (20) or less units, with an ADT (average daily traffic) of 0-200 vehicles a day. • A permanent cul-de-sac is planned at the end of Ronan Court and Ryder Court.. A future roadway connection could be made as designed without removal of the cul-de-sac bulb for Ryder Court. Storm Water / Erosion Control • Storm water detention is not a specific requirement for this project, storm water quality treatment however, is required. • A storm water quality basin is proposed on Lot 48 of the subdivision. This basin is designed to capture and hold the first 1.37 inches of rain from the subdivision and will contain sediment and pollutants from drainage prior to entering the creek area. The lot will then be transferred to the City for maintenance once infrastructure is completed, and all lots are stabilized. • Drainage swales are shown to collect backyard drainage from homes between the cul-de-sacs. • An erosion and sediment control plan has been included with infrastructure plans. • Slab homes (without walkout basements) are planned on the lots along the creek. Homes are proposed at a minimum of four (4) feet above the top of bank of the creek bank. Walkout basements are feasible for these lots. • The 25' Riparian Corridor and the 60' Stream Setback have been noted on the plat/ plans. Sanitary Sewer • The proposed development is to be served by new sanitary sewer mains that will tie to the existing 12" diameter clay tile trunk main for the watershed. • Sewer main extension will serve the lots within the subdivision. • Lots along the creek will need to tie directly to the existing 12" trunk line sewer main with the existing service laterals. Due to the existing main pipe material (clay tile) and City trunk line maintenance requirements, the consultant has proposed to use "Inserta-Tee" type connections for the sewer services for lots along the creek. The Sewer Division will televise the main prior to acceptance of Section Two, after installation of these sewer taps to insure that the integrity of the main is not compromised by lateral installation. As with Section One of the subdivision, the service laterals taps will be installed in conjunction with the sanitary sewer infrastructure construction. Sidewalk • Four (4) ft. wide sidewalk is proposed on one (1) side of all streets within the subdivision. • A sidewalk ramp and pad have been provided at each cluster mail box. Roadway Classification(s) • South Country Club Drive is considered an arterial roadway. All streets proposed will be local roadways. Fire Hydrants / Street Lights/ Utilities • Facilities proposed within the subdivision are in accordance with City standards. City of Jefferson Planning & Zoning Commission LOCATION MAP J INA VA i ESR Svi ' . R,d R<�N?, moo: °N OHO Op CT.1: Q p - !V O m ODOp�2 -OLD :LOHMAN-RD Q' MERRYtN20 - � p G VILLAGE DR Q� DENESEDR - - -,p- O z- Jm 2 C � Q LEAN_DRA LN O U 6J O l° SCODGGS-STATION RD 2p Case No. P18015 0 320 640 Turtle Creek Section Two m Final Subdivision Plat Y PARK RD ,3 ecY444 1,280 Feet N W+E S City of Jefferson Planning & Zoning Commission VICINITY Case No. P18015 0 600 1,200 2,400 Feet Turtle Creek Section Two Final Subdivision Plat N W+E S _A 1 Case No. P18015 0 600 1,200 2,400 Feet Turtle Creek Section Two Final Subdivision Plat N W+E S City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 icpianning(d�ieffcitymo.org www.jeffersoncitymo.gov APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri for the following type of subdivision: _Q Preliminary Plat (_ Final Plat 1. Name of Subdivision: Turtle Creek Subdivision Section Two 2. General location: Tanman Ct., off of South Country Club Dr., Jefferson City, MO 3. Existing/Proposed zoning: RS -2 4. ExistinglProposed use of the property 5. Size of the property in acres: 16.02 6. Total number of lots proposed. 41 Single Family Residential 7. The following items need to be submitted with the plat drawing, if applicable: A. Public improvement construction plans are to be submitted to the Engineering Division with a final plat. Signature of the Division Director, or his/her designee, is needed to certify that plans have been submitted: Signature Date (NIA if no plans are required) B. Description of any variances to the Subdivision Regulations being requested (please note section number of the regulation below and attach a letter stating justification for the variance(s): C. Appropriate application filing fee: $ 404 Preliminary Plat - Residential -$213* plus $4 per lot Preliminary Plat — Commercial/Industrial-$213* plus $4 per lot Final Plat - $240* plus $4 per lot *Revis June 30, 2015 Jim Lage�-4S Y Property Owner Name (type or print) rop w igna Date Paul Samson 5 Q / Engineer Name (type or print) Engineer Si na ure Date J. Brian Rockwell �B Surveyor Name (type or print) Surveyor Signature D to Contact person for this application Name: Central MQ Professional Services, Inc. (Curt Bax) Address: 2500 E. McCarty St., Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone Number: 573-634-3455 For Staff Use Only Attachments: Variance request letter Ll Additional documentation Notes: Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. s QI �' e'E � I &N ` _ U" TURTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION uG a Taa. R12M ,e� SIJ 5'= KV Aky 0..0.1 11. Calp Crdr SECTION TWO - NRRBpR ` 1 1 1711T1a11 Sew A R All L R �� ELECIFIC/M Minim Mi." 7 1 dNl N. art,rYa a Vawt a �;t, \ 1 inch r 80 feet tA1D USE - SMpW 1r,y R.rdaald I OL 521 Ec PSe I SCa .!a 0 30 e0 120 LBO 2 �1 W; p Creek n S«u• Om a•a 11• " �)• C.I. Situated in the SW 4 ,of Sec. 8, T44N, R12W ` L 'in The C' of Jefferson Cole County Mo. PROJECT , T �o� �3' � � (Cisplac 8c.1. - r..e) 3. MFICMC SOO.* Dnr d R.Oad Bw 4ea. Pow eS1 ane Bed 146 Paw r County, y LOCATION j ; ; ,��' _ \ �' `°�" """'' °' 16.02 Acres ZONED RS -2 L) 4 ti 4 Santa Ww real h. r W COY d 3al.rea 7.44 Cad.. 19CALE 1 0• ?• OD X 1L X K t ,k 'l 1 ' O ~ \ S. 1L000PIAM al0a'wECR It. Prap.ry Y ladled " lar Y (a,r ad 4. ;9 5' SEC. 7. T44a R12V ,` 1 ,, e ® \ -ai.-Atha t1051R"Io01 E ad�OP"NwN11adn1.rZ. Yw 01 Rd. Yq. CaY CaNM 110. Pal al w SadM+.d Overt. d IAP Sadh"M Odea d S"00, d lev%ft 44 Kap Ibq. 17 YERMI W. 1 oa�` C�`i• 17.'C dtt at M a Sd E/E• I P..0 W d dl aAd rqa '-M a d 1/Y Lp• Nx cap d d 0.." Y the CRY d Adlno. C41, CaMp, WI.-trl .r. parlkday d-aw a Idem: .4.4a al -. .0., a0rroo..A0.11 •-l•M taOa a ld 1D d TeAY Cray Sddladr S.db1. pa, a SITE LOCATION MAP ` '�'\tt �� 7 a -SIM paekq rel P e.wr r w .aA1 ar a Iaro r can w «p'ioaa'd'b Ao! 9o.t IL yew e3{ Cob Cary R.vM/. doe. Mlp .pad a .( , N3rae':s'EE '...t dw a 11ana. can ad R1da Cat ard.ar. 110.--- / I, f jE , Ioa.1Y , \ • ' r. Y.-W-al-ef b -d-/ a Ley Eno swsrlion s.cGra a law . A&Yla d ard Y PM t , ,r e. MalnOen. -14.d Y C*Book ___. PW eCaM7 Wwd✓. are.. Beak tt Paw "I COW Cwk Randa'. qrn. d- MYP a FM an Pr .ady M NarA•ry 0 t1 r kIx'tK•tE[6- POMIY datalhad in 11tak 0141, am 69 ♦' �� K 11B{e' •-LPCCNC 107 11078 Once: th..N.b- req IM BaMaI d O W! po aOd BeN baa p. 6614 Cal. Cathy Raaddc ILLcf. RUL Es•38 OW". qC ,y'�' ' i s ' ® t. NLbES COIO77KLCIfD ON LOIS d0 -d7 SIWi BE STAB Ild[5 ONLY. fLOpd P�aPay a..usr M B.M Oba QaB• eu ad Bed 6864 BC eSl IG fb 'V i ({ - IS! CK 01 R Set nth Lnt r .!a rc Paw Es3. W 1aYMr9 tmV NU5CHI7, dam W -t-" l-ftl a odd 4N7 L" lJ' ' ,1'Sp0' RM 1,1� lL0 p \ SE ATCN SHOU BE A 1 WJM Of 4' ABMT 113 TOP Of dIFEK dM S1Mdr.e SKON T»• 370.57 Irl Y IM Nwai rwOwy ccar IMnal. mW peM dee MYq tM enc I I r ® W. ata PO IST tdAdi 2. LOIS 40-47 r1R SUIUCC! ro A 25' RIDE RVAIM COMMON, ROS AN "01b-1111+ cant M . ken a Had dnabr M der a nrd Y Beet ase. pqO 137. ON. 1.tij 1 ' / au c BL as IC. eA S' � •L x aa3� \ 1an701PL 3S• xtt 5711/+1 SE1m (bo' low AS 900. WMUY Caa1y Randa'. Mt; 0- NST43104t. +r0 nw wnagat" w. of .aa Ina O -W Y 800 jp ' l.'/ ^ i 1 MtCId OCOLMIG WWAMN WITHIN THE 25' WLW1 CWMM SWIL NOT a Sa1WnMR I..N.POP 3xoru 1. VWde1Yq Cie Star IAo 56147 1w�7 b o PaM 16.00 IOW Var Ted M naaN d I ( 1134=18'. N34"w2Et N74roe•2at N1 \ uTNaEa aBasRm, Aed 11D ICNm a sLssTwrtvLu Atr1TRB FMM is SET s/a ,s. �fl '- , 1 118342' 675 1$ l ,roar a0.ar Boar ''�� 3. Lm u swu a xouTEo ro THE qn a 4crrERscB FOR YwmwlcE ar A SIATIE ON 9110411H. n' -1101NW&Olerne r b tdNrd oI a a. sa of t orlQlaIN d rr s.aHon a ar . y .aal.rary Cana d • Mea a Ynd "aver M dI. o .dal Y Boa 367• M2. 331, a. t , V l .I I Y p i 1 r 181 s RSO ar Rr SM WAR OtKM MN. WCaato ft - W. qk.; neer owboalS4t N& 31. w oana Ocala S.I. lh. ar -IV (E} I ' r r r r w eeaalwy Tr a sod Owl a.wYr Y Bea 367. PLO. 351. e67.ro irl to tlr r1.rOr.day l i ' ,`•1 :� $ s2 ,^.i g .R _ -' -- 4. pLS(W TRACT B Is NOT ,w I CIWOKA BL= LOT. nC NIM c PON 0 To BE '-•r a . Ie -7 a lad amw y and a neae M emk 376 pp. ea, ew CaM7 I „ ' Q� - I ® ^ i ® - a ® - \ TRANSI JU To THE MORS or of A03 24 LIE m R.Wrow. aIle., tlwN. SOIx'fa•E,'Opq IM wday ee a W Wan a lad d..aB.d y I r I I an ac g nv c nu Ae an AE r' / y, drd of recta M O.a = PW eta 104.7E Hat to w •aC••••l wy carer Ilwal; r a N3410E'tEi l l Y *3 - Y i^ 51 , �9J' , I ( 1S' G. Ua a Slam haw" (a.L / n_:m..k J' / �%OS �''(� ab x"4t dioNp v+ .e.wry Er d ." tree d Wad dwrw y der d nerd Y Beak I L VM BARD" LLC 326 pee• aW 741.14 f d Y -A rr" 1 .Ar�1 oerlw d Oat 20 d aA TaIY peek SbcFiiion gg r 1 T ®SS,pY aO,rq' 35.60' 7 ,+ BL W. PG 157 S.ctiea ON: cava Wal�q w IaNMrU d coal prepay dauYr Y BOak 6664 poy. {52 eM Bca1 thea p•w 163. SSfDb•23V. -Y9 ae carry I -alder a ade lath. a«k 9A&Alen I Salk. as 87438 (.at th.- SSS•51'31t oW 4 W •-1.06 kanOr) a W 1.16 q.d Sae Sw I.rL - - _ N3COIS2at RYOER CT._ _ ^ M1 d✓ •�/. 49L'1' - _ _ - (50• RN) 4 /. ' \ Sndxian SOai.n Co.. 17.14 lana IA..r $Sfd24b, dap w .adry h.a,da7 a W TTY (} IW'OY1at 207.02' OvA SutaAia Sala. On, 134.00 IW b ad •18•1.1•M carr d Lal 10 d 1.% Cr.A SWdadan S.caa. Ca and w PONT or KOOVIC. / ' r IW.CO! - M.CO'- 8000• 8087' ROOD' 1738' lam''/ ' \� Carl -y.9 um Leta ,' y�J,{$ ,,�r 11 1 1•I ® li•5a� �I �r---_ � - _ --- --fl --- / 11•A laorLWb' L' g ; l' j , f 631 rc I O I i 1„ \ US• y,ca3 15 Gn 171..ISkm. Oa.O,• a Sm 5- I'd L. 0a c \ Rrada'. qtr., tale C.*. riyOurlSrM M (Plat 1164 IL paw 611 Cab cavy �' ` 17N1SOL ROND A R 711 _ -- 1 TQT•1a' I $ i a® = .13 K an 4b - ,; all C y .re .c i� ® \•, EK GE V. 137 ftwCoYEt NHC4181 I I FDL S I.P. I r1 03"` ; l � I , IOO.ar Ka 110m, aaw i i °°°°' 00 -CW roar "I" %, lP Ix f01'Wt I SIVA sw k 7 WS, Ngtf11UB/ CCtNLN / ; I .201-ts' i I I I YC S. {N, RI71 (� 5CT s/6' IP r sae the TML. 12. / i,✓ ® 5 i I g� i Ct ®4 $ ® ® $ ® \ '•" ' 8 - 1 .„ c err c >Q e.rs x an c'l7 r ars AE arc aas.c • k' K ,�Ci�.p,/1 ✓ I I� aa1 AC �' I l 1 Y - - 5 ,� BB'94'lBi ,1W.tB• SEC 0. T4aN, R1rM SET s/s• L►.7PrWad KW ar mac y wa. prreda that L w admlwa4 MM9 w err a Or d Md RSOdra4 ) r• 1 2x7./0' I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - `� \ aI - IIT I WY Wa a P- Tract .161.1se ar ..wnab ad a IWO ad w m.Ar. a w .CO' RI r M a.. 1•e•kq apry 6 -VOW Har OMW W Wath b r D. evwp.C a I N7.00' M00' GOOD' MM' MOO' p 7 I 1 ® i \.; ` PW pAk re 1-. al eV -b er arNaaaa (rl p0aaw d ra-4 as wa. o. q q 11 I 0.71 c I _ _ RONM7 CT. MC1'7YE _ � _ _ 1� i `\(7\ aO Par. dal " b. Wew a'TW. pack S168Aren SKI. lee.• - - - 1 -70 R/&j- - 6 Sae See Ia'L , % r .p A6ff11 f. 96LIUE�'1t t OA kat due rd Parr"* ordeal .dal WcPay h- b- Palo Y PA ` r I ever 100.00' - m. - - M -CO'-- - W00' __ _ a0.ar-- __ M00' so CO, r I - _ w - _ - - - - _ _ M MYgk Ma..l, w WNdPW aorf a W brt Mr MaYMO I.t ,d. xen0 Wr __- Li r f >- 4LS1'OOYbt 19S.N' 1 i - - - _ /, •o a BL 7A. IO 6q \ 0d1 al - SO1L BE IM PC 93 :0' $NFIM AIBAC I I g II ( -- -- - C T. - w Is OM ut s oarAe a S. z .. rrN I �r�74a \ • Lw• LLC. a� i I -�SE i0 1 CCS p ® CFE ® q C ® � ® Q� et g 'g ' " \ ` anx d31 x 0419 an K all A< arl K e 7r4.cR yQ ¢�'4r` 3a■- L Lao4 e..ara Na.artw �� I N710D73t i rc ^ 6'r ar1Ot SWE Of LISSOM) I 1 I w 16 alar LAIR SOQO wr om GxtA1L ' ` 'Li , �y ! i Q� i ' roto• ar rn 7 4 \ ` CORM OF COLE fA 5/B' rD. $07110N ITP 1R LLC. I $ I 0.16 c f 0. 3/0' 1. 87aroBYBY BB1.a8' a P a P fa P Pa 12. PO 602 a 664 PO 9US , 1 , 1 1 I I L01 r) a Oir ear a 70-, bra..e p1• -a. did app.. I I' I I 856'6l'98'6 LOT It I I I I 1 III I i (or 70 \ wore .prod aer..M mcOAr tl.r la�ewq kuhuara ar •a^••Wdar w cam. Y M roe 6/B'gP. I 114 Ow I T3aa' LOT 12 lft1 Lot 13 1 LOT I4 I lot is 1 107 14 W 15' Cee tAa Fad cal le 1 car 17 1iL1NeRff$.1' 1 Id. Hee ad elle der BSa oe'2B1f lBa.oa -r PB. i1 w 844 COO&MW. I I P6. 12. 631 I) \ 1. 1Bnro dorrL 1 1- .0 tar and dbad - pp - - P.O..17. I 141011" LWIAII, oor I I; y^ � I 9i NIM B I H 31K WNp N � N[; LLC �REINBDI�SION ME LLC I I VIL LLG N6 VQ I W6 UCE BC � Pa 111 ' .i ng rd W1 d% dLal 7� '; I BL 6316 iC w 1 Is: sx ♦ i RONar9aBIL atb�1-. � 3tt 711271E I I �ic �D w�wL"'� ri roe ,� `nliJairJ� >�. ' I tC[!B , I I car 10 L ' IBL V& rC re 1 Be IM PCPC. 4q 1 1 �y� I' I P; ca. Ir. Eaa. I r C.Na 071aS ... , I 1s• Oen uL Efd of ' $ H I 1 1 SMON ONE I 1 I 1 I'B. ,7. pe ai4 I j • _ I 1 MA C-aah On GTknc Psi ROOM LLC 1 I: I � �a I •- 1 L_----- - - --- --- --- - 1 t /-- E CT. 1,,, lq p �[a r ... -- i=r---- - -L - - -+ra C - - --LJL E-�jt t - - - L -�-}'�'L - - Ld�_ gra r /+ '�%/' a�( Ndar nbW 14 r I 1 (s0' R oearl.M e4o. _ STATE Of CISSOI.q L Pe CRr 00 d wall a INf.ran, C" a CAN. Adv r 11-ACdBIfY Or COLE 'a heavy aarl4r Mal 1%. Od .a Waved by w H•0- d to City a 3r7w4a.. 'y7 •R• -t a aver Ila -A y Na. Ord- -_---, TM. b b ed Reel d IAe I a Law. LLC, .r redhb. .o. tree/.. celdrr mac prrs'd dncNOq fir la record 20-- taw"AWWad Gil _- dal a -____-__-__-- 20__. rpadYq tM prap+y a- a d ea lb" Mr.r rd cal 1M refylll an nwwgM a IN. pd aM II.d W rNrp aL _-- 0'c __- __N., _ .e1 pra.r0 W soaada.ae din Ike r.pdanW4 d Br Caw Trgrc Atepr Py -e Pew. C11' CMrt _ d.nd.d1 tar a OOa Pravay Ba.da7 Suer Awr•WC r.cordr i PLO. �- Mow w - lu +Ye4.cY. RRdd...w1d Il.tar. MencR P;. t.Mr TL Sanaa /a7'. 'nl r,Wm RrP�, Jr., arcade Y MMrO eared, I hoe hr.a.lo M O.d .r Ch.aa a PAk Make DNr1a of P --ft aW Pntatk. S..i- ilio -_- ft at _ MIB Case No. P18015 1050 S Country Club Drive Final Subdivision Plat Turtle Creek Subdivision, Section Two Central Ifissouri Professional Services, In y,�tiCL1F IROENEERII40 - EURTOM - 4ATZRIAL5 TfSTTNO 2000 B. WeCARTT Mer (571) 1n-3= 3ErrRR8M1 Crry. NLASOURI 63101 FM LS71) 44-41n ," TURTLE CREEK SUBDMSloN - SECTION Two EAw SW 1/4. SW 1/4, Sea 8. T40. R12W, JBHemn ply, MO 4 ar e.aaA In Ni 1n1• tAGE. LLC. alOytzs*K SCINCIS 1 am C5 -M-1018 .NI a CIH mu 1'-M' Pit `g'a �w °"' an a +8th I Bar 1 Or 1 Iga s 01-014