HomeMy Public PortalAbout2018-04-18 packet
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats
as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Board of Directors
Wednesday, April 18, 2018 at 12:15 p.m.
Meeting Location: Boone/Bancroft Room # 200, John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 - Enter through Main Lobby
Tentative Agenda
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
2. Public comment
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of February 21, 2018
5. Communication Received
A. OneDOT approving CAMPO TIP Amendment 1. US 50 Outer Road Improvements
6. New Business
A. 2019-2023 Transportation Improvement Program Development
Action Requested: Staff recommends beginning a 25 day public comment period.
Staff Report: Staff has updated the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Program Year 2019-
2023. The Program Year runs from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2023.
B. FY2019 Unified Planning Work Program Development
Action Requested: Staff recommends beginning a 7 day public comment period.
Staff Report: Staff has updated the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for Fiscal Year 2019. The
Fiscal Year runs from November 1, 2018 to October 31, 2019. Changes include priorities for 2019, major
tasks completed in 2018, and updates of tasks to be completed for each of the five work elements.
7. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
8. Next Meeting Date – Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 12:15 p.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room #200
9. Adjournment
NOTES
Box lunches will be ordered from the Old Brick House Deli at a cost of $6.25 per person. Box lunches include a
sandwich and chips. Mayonnaise and mustard packets are included. Sandwich options: ham on French baguette;
Italian hero on French baguette; smoked turkey & bacon on whole grain wheat. Deluxe house salad: $6.25; Cobb
Salad: $6.25
Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457
MINUTES
Board of Directors
CAPITAL AREA M ETROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
February 21, 2018
12:15 p.m.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Larry Benz, P.E., Cole County
Jeff Hoelscher, Chairman, Cole County
Rick Hess, Holts Summit
Ron Fitzwater, Jefferson City
Eric Barron, Designee for Ken Hussey, Jefferson City
Gerry Stegeman, Designee for Mark Mehmert, Jefferson City
Britt Smith, Designee for Matt Morasch, Jefferson City
Erin Wiseman, Jefferson City*
Doug Reece, St. Martins, Small Cities Representative
David Silvester, MoDOT
*Arrived Late
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
Roger Fischer, Callaway County
Larry Henry, Jefferson City
Sonny Sanders, Jefferson City
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT (Non-Voting)
Enos Han, FHWA
Marty Wilson, Callaway County Economic Development Representative
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT (Non-Voting)
Randy Allen, Jefferson City Chamber of Commerce
Michael Henderson, MoDOT
Jeremiah Shuler, FTA
CAMPO STAFF PRESENT (Non-Voting)
Alex Rotenberry, Transportation Planner
Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner
Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant
GUESTS PRESENT:
Amy Burec, Holts Summit
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum.
Chairman Hoelscher called the meeting to order at 12:17 p.m.
Ms. Stratman took roll call. A quorum was present with 9 of 13 members or their designee
present.
2. Public Comment
No comments were received.
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed
unanimously.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Board of Directors
February 21, 2018 Page 2
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of December 13, 2017
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Reece seconded to approve the minutes from the Regular Meeting of
December 13, 2017 as printed. The motion passed unanimously.
5. Communications Received
No correspondence was received.
6. New Business
A. Proposed Amendment to the 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program: US 50
Outer Road Improvements
Mr. Rotenberry explained that MoDOT split TIP Project 2017-03, US 50 Outer Road Pavement
Improvements, into two projects. He stated that the existing project retains the original TIP number
and changes the dollar amount through an administrative modification. Mr. Rotenberry explained
that the second project is being entered as a new project, requiring a TIP Amendment. He stated
that this project, prior to being split, is identified in the 2013-2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
Mr. Silvester explained that the original project included both concrete and asphalt repair. He
stated that due to bids received, it was determined to split the asphalt and concrete improvements
into two separate phases.
Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Benz seconded to conclude the public comment period and approve
the proposed amendment to the 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program. The motion
passed unanimously.
B. Federal Safety Performance Measures
Mr. Rotenberry explained that within the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, the
Federal Highway Administration established 5 performance measures to assess performance and
carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program: (1) number of vehicle fatalities, (2) rate of
fatalities per VMT, (3) number of serious injuries, (4) rate of serious injuries per vehicle miles
traveled, and (5) number of combined non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries.
He stated that CAMPO must adopt safety targets, as outlined in the FAST Act, by February 28,
2018. Mr. Rotenberry explained that staff recommends that CAMPO accept the target percentages
established by MoDOT as applied toward the MPO area. He stated that the targets are based on a
7% fatality reduction, 4% serious injury reduction, 1% vehicle miles traveled increase and 4% non-
motorized fatality and serious injury reduction. Mr. Rotenberry explained that MoDOT established
the following statewide targets in August 2017: (1) number of fatalities; (2) fatality rate per 100
million vehicle miles traveled; (3) number of serious injuries; (4) serious injury rate per 100 million
vehicle miles traveled; and (5) number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries. He stated
that the targets are reasonable for the CAMPO region and if the targets are not met, CAMPO staff
can calibrate them to improve accuracy. Mr. Rotenberry explained that while the state safety targets
are an important measure with respect to transportation planning, there are no repercussions to the
CAMPO area for failing to achieve safety targets.
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to approve and incorporate the safety performance
targets into the 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program. The motion passed unanimously.
7. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
• Transportation Improvement Program Update
• Annual Planning Partners Meeting
• Visioning and Travel Demand Model Update
• Metropolitan Transportation Plan Update
• Unified Planning Work Program Update
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Board of Directors
February 21, 2018 Page 3
8. Next Meeting Date – Wednesday, March 21, 2018 at 12:15 p.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room
#200
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 12:34 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant
March 5, 2018
Mr. Patrick K. McKenna, Director
Missouri Department of Transportation
PO Box 270
Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
RE: ONE DOT Approval to Incorporate TIP Amendment # 1 into the FY 2018-2022 STIP
Dear Mr. McKenna:
ONE DOT hereby approves the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) request of
February 28, 2018 to incorporate Amendment #1 of the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization (CAMPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) into the FY 2018-2022
Missouri Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The amendment includes the
addition of one MoDOT project.
The CAMPO Board of Directors approved this amendment on February 21, 2018. The Governor
of Missouri approved this amendment on February 27, 2018.
In accordance with 23 CFR 450.218(b) and 450.328(a) and (b), we find that this STIP amendment
is based on a statewide transportation planning process that substantially meets the requirements
of 23 U.S.C 134 and 135; 49 U.S.C. 5303 and 5304; and 23 CFR 450 Subparts A, B, and C.
If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Enos Han of FHWA at
(573) 638-2625.
Sincerely,
For: Kevin Ward, P.E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration
901 Locust Street, Room 404 3220 W. Edgewood
Kansas City, MO 64106 Jefferson City, MO 65109
816-329-3920 573-636-7104
816-329-3921 (fax) 573-636-9283 (fax)
U.S. Department of Transportation
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Board of Directors Staff Report
Program Year 2019-2023 Transportation Improvement Program
April 18, 2018
Summary
A Draft of the Program Year 2019-2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) has been reviewed and
approved by the CAMPO Technical Committee. The Technical Committee has recommended approval by the
Board of Directors. The TIP is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be implemented within
the Metropolitan Planning Area, which are funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and
Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed “regionally significant” ($500 million dollars or more).
The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation, the
jurisdictions in the CAMPO region, and local public transportation operators.
The CAMPO TIP year runs from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2023. This 5 year TIP includes 25 projects that total
over $55 million dollars to be spent in the CAMPO region. The TIP discusses federal performance measure
targets that have been reviewed by the Technical Committee and passed by the Board of Directors. It has
updated the financial data of all jurisdictions within the CAMPO region to demonstrate fiscal constraint, which
is the availability of local matching funds for federal transportation dollars from FHWA or FTA. Additionally,
the TIP contains the Program of Projects that public transportation agencies are required to create, and includes
projects and costs, and an illustrative project list for JEFFTRAN.
Staff Recommendation
Staff has worked extensively with local jurisdictions, public transportation providers, and MoDOT to
demonstrate fiscal constraint and show projects in the CAMPO region for the next five program years. All
jurisdictions active with CAMPO have consulted with staff to ensure financial details and projects are correct
and appropriate.
Staff recommends review of the document opening of a 25-day public comment period as required by the
CAMPO Public Participation Plan.
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to open a 25-day public comment period for the Draft Program Year 2019-2023 Transportation
Improvement Program.
Agenda Item 6A
Transportation Improvement Program
Program Years 2019 - 2023
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2023
Adopted XXXXXX
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal
Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this
report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of
Transportation.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the
grounds of race, color, sex, age, disability or national origin, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259).
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone: (573) 634-6410 Fax: (573) 634-6457
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1
Public Participation ....................................................................................................................................... 2
Project Selection ........................................................................................................................................... 2
TIP Development ........................................................................................................................................... 3
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications .................................................................................... 3
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects ............................................................................................................. 3
Air Quality Designation ................................................................................................................................. 4
Environmental Justice ................................................................................................................................... 4
Federal Performance Measures .................................................................................................................... 4
Financial Plan ................................................................................................................................................ 6
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding ......................................................................... 6
Operations and Maintenance – MoDOT ................................................................................................. 10
Operations and Maintenance - Local Government ................................................................................ 10
Financial Constraint ................................................................................................................................ 12
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects ............................................................................................. 13
Figure 9 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects ................................................................. 18
Program of Projects - OATS ......................................................................................................................... 19
Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN ................................................................................................................. 20
Multimodal Projects .................................................................................................................................... 20
Appendix A – Amendments and Administrative Modifications.................................................................. 21
Appendix B – Federal Funding Sources ....................................................................................................... 22
Appendix C – Policies and Procedures ........................................................................................................ 23
Appendix D – Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification .............................................. 27
Appendix E – Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 28
i
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors
and Individuals with Disabilities
5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
CAMPO Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality Program
CO Carbon Monoxide (vehicle
emissions)
EPA Environmental Protection
Agency
FAST Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act
FHWA Federal Highway
Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FY Fiscal Year
HC Hydrocarbon (vehicle
emissions)
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement
Program
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in
the 21st Century
MoDOT Missouri Department of
Transportation
MPO Metropolitan Planning
Organization
MTP Metropolitan Transportation
Plan
NHFP National Highway Freight
Program
NHPP National Highway Performance
Program
NOx Nitrogen Oxides
ONE DOT Collaboration between FHWA
and FTA
PBPP Performance Based Planning
and Programming
POP Program of Projects
PM Particulate Matter
STIP State Transportation
Improvement Program
STBG Surface Transportation Block
Grant Program
TAP Transportation Alternatives
TCOS Taking Care of the System
TCOS (AC) Taking Care of the System
(Advanced Construction)
TERM Transit Economic Requirements
Model
TIP Transportation Improvement
Program
TPM Transportation Performance
Management
VMT Vehicle Miles of Travel
ii
(Resolution approving TIP goes here)
iii
(CAMPO Board, TC, and staff listing goes here)
1
Introduction
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) is the designated metropolitan planning
organization for the Jefferson City, Missouri planning area whose purpose is to carry out a continuing,
cooperative, and comprehensive long range transportation planning process. As part of this process, in
2017, CAMPO updated the 2013-2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) with the last program
year TIP, to address the current and future transportation needs for the Metropolitan Planning Area
(MPA). The MPA includes a southern portion of Callaway County, northeastern portion of Cole County,
cities of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, and Wardsville.
Figure 1 – The CAMPO Planning Area
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects
to be implemented within the MPA. The projects are funded by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed “regionally significant” ($500 million
or higher projects). Each project or project phase included in the TIP is consistent with investment
strategies discussed in the MTP and is part of the process of applying for funds from the FHWA and
FTA. Certain capital and non-capital transportation projects using funding under 23 U.S.C. and 49
2
U.S.C. Chapter 53 or regionally significant projects requiring action by the FHWA or the FTA are
required to be included in the TIP. The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with the
Missouri Department of Transportation and local public transportation operators.
Public Participation
CAMPO seeks active and meaningful involvement of the public and interested parties in the development
and update of transportation plans and programs, including the TIP. All meetings of the CAMPO
Technical Committee and Board of Directors are open to the public. All meeting agendas and minutes are
available on the City of Jefferson website or upon request. CAMPO provides all interested parties and the
public with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP as required by federal law.
Reasonable opportunity to comment and participate on the proposed TIP is made following the policies in
the CAMPO Public Participation Plan located on the CAMPO website at
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo. The approved TIP is available for review at several locations
throughout the CAMPO planning area as outlined in the Public Participation Plan.
The FTA allows a grantee, e.g. JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc., to rely on locally adopted public
participation plans for the submittal of their projects in lieu of a separate “Program of Projects” (POP) if
the grantee has coordinated with CAMPO and has ensured that the public is aware that the TIP and the
Public Participation Plan is being used to satisfy the POP public participation requirements. JEFFTRAN
is the public transit provider for the City of Jefferson and OATS, Inc. is a not-for-profit 501(c)3
corporation providing specialized transportation for senior citizens, people with disabilities and the rural
general public in 87 Missouri counties. Federal Transit Administration recipients of certain categories of
funds, JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. must follow a public participation plan. Both JEFFTRAN and OATS,
Inc. meet this coordination and public awareness criteria.
Project Selection
Transportation projects, funded by direct allocation of Federal funds to a project sponsor, award of
Federal funds via competitive grant, or wholly funded by the sponsor, are selected by the agency having
jurisdiction over the project using their own criteria and submitted to the CAMPO Board of Directors for
inclusion in the TIP. Transportation projects included within the TIP should be consistent with
investment strategies discussed in the MTP.
Transportation projects, funded by sub-allocated Federal funds directly to CAMPO or otherwise made
available for programming at the discretion of CAMPO, are selected based on competitive process
approved by the CAMPO Board of Directors. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on
CAMPO priorities by staff, and review by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to
the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote of approval. The ranking process has unique evaluation
criteria for different categories of projects – roadway/intersection, bridge, non-motorized, transit, and
‘other.’
3
TIP Development
The TIP is updated every year and covers a 5-year period starting July 1, 2018. TIP development begins
with a verification of status of projects in the current TIP, solicitation of new projects, and request for
budget information from local jurisdictions. Local transit providers are also requested to provide
information needed to develop their “Program of Projects” for inclusion in the TIP. CAMPO staff, with
support from the Technical Committee, member jurisdictions, MoDOT, FHWA, and FTA, develop the
financial plan, project listings, maintenance and operations, and other components of the TIP.
Once the draft TIP is developed, it is presented to the Technical Committee for review and
recommendation to the Board of Directors. A 25 day public comment period and public hearing are held
prior to the Board of Directors approval of the TIP. The Board then requests approval of the TIP by the
Governor and ONE DOT (consisting of FHWA and FTA). More information about public involvement
activities can be found in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan.
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Between TIP updates, if projects need to be added, removed or changed, the TIP can be changed either by
amendment or administrative modifications. Definitions of an amendment or an administrative
modification, and information about public participation, notifications, and other procedures regarding
amendments and administrative modifications, can be found in Appendix C – Policies and Procedures of
this document. Appendix A contains a listing of amendments and administrative modifications that have
occurred to this document.
Previous Projects
The TIP will include a listing of major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and identify
any significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. Major projects are defined as
transportation improvement projects receiving Federal financial assistance with an estimated total cost of
$500 million or more or that have been identified by the FHWA as being a major project.
No major projects were implemented, and no significant delays or projects from the previous TIP have
been identified.
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) requires that CAMPO publish an annual
listing of federally obligated projects. The Annual Listing of Projects is an index of projects which used
Federal funds that were obligated in the preceding TIP program year. Obligated projects are consistent
with the funding categories identified in the TIP.
4
An obligation is the Federal government’s legal commitment to pay the Federal share of a project’s cost.
An obligated project is one that has been authorized and funds have been obligated by a Federal agency.
Obligated projects are not necessarily initiated or completed in the program year, and the amount of the
obligation will not necessarily equal the total cost of the project. For Federal Transit Administration
projects, obligation occurs when the grant is awarded. For Federal Highway Administration projects,
obligation occurs when a project agreement is executed and the State/grantee requests that the funds be
obligated.
CAMPO publishes the Annual Listing of Obligated Projects yearly within 90 days of the previous TIP’s
program year. The Annual Listing of Obligated Projects is posted on the CAMPO website at
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo.
Air Quality Designation
The United States Environmental Protection Agency has designated the CAMPO Metropolitan Planning
Area as being in attainment for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Small
Particulate Matter (PM-2.5) Lead, and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2).
Environmental Justice
Executive Order 12898 requires agencies receiving federal funding to meaningfully address low-income
and minority populations in their plans, programs, policies, and activities. CAMPO staff expects project
sponsors to identify and mitigate any disproportionately high and adverse effects of federal transportation
programs.
Federal Performance Measures
In the passage of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), and continuing into
the FAST Act, Congress established Transportation Performance Management (TPM). FHWA defines
TPM as a strategic approach that uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to
achieve national performance goals.
Another new requirement is Performance Based Planning and Programming (PBPP) which impacts the
TIP and the MTP. PBPP refers to the application of performance management principles within the
planning and programming processes of transportation agencies to achieve desired performance outcomes
for the multimodal transportation system.
To comply with these new requirements, the CAMPO Board of Directors adopted targets for two
performance areas: the Transit Asset Management measures and Safety measures.
5
Transit Asset Management Measures
MoDOT collected and evaluated existing buses and facilities to be included in the State Transit Asset
Management Plan and used this information to set targets, which will be evaluated on an annual basis as
inventory changes. JEFFTRAN opted to create its own Transit Asset Management Plan and set its own
targets, which are identical to the state targets, as listed below.
Figure 2 – Transit Asset Management targets by MoDOT and JEFFTRAN
Assets
Performance Measure State Targets JEFFTRAN
Targets
Equipment
Non-revenue support-
service and maintenance
vehicles
Percentage of vehicles met or
exceeded Useful Life
Benchmark
50 percent 50 percent
Rolling Stock
Revenue vehicles by mode
Percentage of vehicles met or
exceeded Useful Life
Benchmark
50 percent 50 percent
Infrastructure (not
applicable in state plan)
Only rail fixed-guideway,
track, signals and systems
Percentage of track segments
with performance restrictions
by class
Not Applicable Not Applicable
Facilities
Percentage of assets with
condition rating below 3.0 on
FTA TERM* Scale
25 percent with
condition rating
below 3.0 on
FTA TERM
Scale
25 percent with
condition rating
below 3.0 on FTA
TERM Scale
* TERM is a Federal Transit Administration Transit Economic Requirements Model which helps transit agencies assess their
state of good repair backlog, level of annual investment to attain state of good repair, impact of variations in funding, and
investment priorities.
JEFFTRAN has its budget, fiscally constrained projects, and Program of Projects in this document. The
agency has identified $125,000 that may be utilized for bus replacement and other capital projects to help
JEFFTRAN move towards these targets.
Safety Measures
The Federal Highway Administration established 5 performance measures to assess performance and
carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program: (1) number of fatalities, (2) rate of fatalities per
vehicle mile traveled (VMT), (3) number of serious injuries, (4) rate of serious injuries per VMT, and (5)
number of combined non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries.
MoDOT established the following statewide safety targets in August 2017, as seen in Figure 3, which
shows the targets set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. These targets are updated annually.
6
Figure 3 – Safety Performance Measures set by MoDOT*
Performance Measure 5-year Rolling Average
(2012-2016)
5-Year Rolling
Average Statewide
Target for CY2018
Number of Fatalities 833.6 857.7
Fatality rate per 100 Million VMT 1.173 1.163
Number of Serious Injuries 4,877.2 4,559.3
Serious Injury Rate per 100 Million
VMT
6.884 6.191
Number of Non-Motorized
Fatalities and Serious Injuries
431.4 431.9
* Targets based on the State Highway Safety Plan: Missouri Blueprint -A Partnership Towards Zero Deaths, a 7% fatality
reduction, 4% serious injury reduction, 1% VMT increase and 4 % non-motorized reduction
There are a number of projects programmed for safety in the TIP, totaling $3,492,000 for Program Years
2019-2023, all sponsored by the Central District of MoDOT, to help the State move towards these targets.
CAMPO staff also actively participates in the Central District Coalition of Roadway Safety, which works
to implement Missouri’s Blueprint ultimate goal of zero fatalities on Missouri roadways, and participates
in the annual Highway Safety and Traffic Blueprint Conference.
Financial Plan
The TIP includes a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, and
indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to
carry out the TIP. CAMPO, MoDOT, and public transportation operators cooperatively develop
estimates of funds that are reasonably expected to be available to support TIP implementation. Only
projects for which construction or operating funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be
included. In developing the financial plan, CAMPO takes into account all projects and strategies funded
under Title 23 U.S.C., Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, and other federal funds, and regionally significant
projects that are not federally funded. For purposes of transportation operations and maintenance, the
financial plan shall contain system-level estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably
expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways (as defined by Title 23
U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation (as defined by Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53).
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding
Federal funding forecasts, provided by MoDOT based on published notices in the Federal Register,
estimate fiscal year authorization levels by the FHWA and FTA under the current highway act. Appendix
B briefly describes most of the Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO
planning area.
For Federally-funded projects, the TIP must identify the appropriate “matching funds” by source. The
matching funds are usually provided by state and local governments. State revenue forecasts are also
7
provided by MoDOT based on historical data of the State Fuel Tax, State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax and
General Revenue.
Local revenue forecast from the County Aid Road Trust (State Fuel Tax and State Vehicle Sales and Use
Tax) for each jurisdiction are based on past distributions and are assumed to continue a trend of a 2
percent inflation rate. The City of Jefferson has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement
Program and a ½ cent sales tax for Parks and Recreation, which supports greenways and other non-
motorized transportation activities. The City of Jefferson has provided its own future revenue projections
from these sources. Cole County has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a
real property tax levy of $0.27 earmarked for Road & Bridges. All small cities get $100,000 every five
years from Cole County, which comes from the aforementioned sales tax. Callaway County has a real
property tax levy of $0.2466 earmarked for Road & Bridges.
Outlined in Figure 4 are local forecasts of revenue sources for over the life of the TIP available for
transportation projects, operations and maintenance.
Figure 4 – Forecast Revenue for Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance.
Callaway County 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)1,737,801$ 1,772,557$ 1,808,008$ 1,844,169$ 1,881,052$ 9,043,587$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.2466 levy)1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 9,500,000$
Transfer from general revenue 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,500,000$
Cole County
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)1,242,448$ 1,267,296$ 1,292,642$ 1,318,495$ 1,344,865$ 6,465,747$
Sales Tax 5,335,647$ 5,335,647$ 5,335,647$ 5,335,647$ 5,335,647$ 26,678,235$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.27 levy)3,958,237$ 3,958,237$ 3,958,237$ 3,958,237$ 3,958,237$ 19,791,185$
Motor Vehicle Sales Tax 352,209$ 352,209$ 352,209$ 352,209$ 352,209$ 1,761,045$
Holts Summit
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)**149,358$ 149,645$ 149,937$ 150,236$ 150,540$ 749,716$
Transportation Sales Tax 400,000$ 406,000$ 412,000$ 418,000$ 424,000$ 2,060,000$
Sales Tax 32,500$ 33,150$ 33,800$ 34,500$ 35,190$ 169,140$
Cap Imp Street Revenue 40,170$ 41,375$ 42,616$ 43,895$ 45,212$ 213,268$
Interest 8,800$ 9,200$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 48,000$
NID Deposits 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 40,000$
City of Jefferson
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)1,791,438$ 1,827,267$ 1,863,812$ 1,901,088$ 1,939,110$ 9,322,716$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Parks Sales Tax 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 24,759,390$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement (Expires March 2022)1,720,000$ 1,720,000$ 1,720,000$ 1,720,000$ 1,720,000$ 8,600,000$
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
Passenger Fares & Misc. 170,000$ 175,000$ 180,000$ 190,000$ 195,000$ 910,000$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement (Expires March 2022)80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 400,000$
St. Martins
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)47,407$ 48,355$ 49,322$ 50,308$ 51,315$ 246,707$
General Revenue Funds 210,700$ 214,914$ 219,212$ 223,597$ 228,068$ 1,096,491$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement*20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Taos
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)36,512$ 37,242$ 37,987$ 38,746$ 39,521$ 190,007$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement* 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Wardsville
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)62,627$ 63,879$ 65,157$ 66,460$ 67,789$ 325,913$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement* 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
OATS
Passenger Fares, Misc.6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 30,000$
Section 5310 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 30,000$
Medicaid Transportation 36,000$ 36,000$ 36,000$ 36,000$ 36,000$ 180,000$
124,411,147$
Note: County Aid Road Trust includes State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales/Use Tax and Licensing Fees.
Please see more on CART funds here: http://dor.mo.gov/publicreports/index.php#motorfuel
* This is distributed from Cole County
Available Local Transportation Funds
Total Local Funds
CART Funds based on 2017 numbers from MoDOT. There is a conservative two (2)
percent increase per year, based on historical numbers.
** Holts Summit now receives Lake Mykee's CART funds after they merged in 2017.
8
In the past, local governments have used general revenue and other sources of revenue, as they deemed
appropriate to match transportation grants awarded. It is not uncommon, nor difficult, for local
jurisdictions to transfer funds from one account to another at their discretion.
Figure 5 shows the total programmed project funds and available project funds by source. The project
costs have inflation factored in by each project sponsor. The instructions on the form used to submit a
project for inclusion in the TIP reminds the project sponsor to take inflation into account when estimating
the project’s cost. Since the last iteration of the MTP, the inflation factor for the TIP has been set as 2
percent.
9
Figure 5 – Programmed and Available Funds by Source.
2
0
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
3
T
o
t
a
l
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
2
2
T
o
t
a
l
F
H
W
A
N
H
P
P
$
8
8
4
,
8
0
0
$
8
,
5
9
2
,
8
0
0
$
4
,
1
6
8
,
8
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
1
3
,
6
4
6
,
4
0
0
$
8
8
4
,
8
0
0
$
8
,
5
9
2
,
8
0
0
$
4
,
1
6
8
,
8
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
1
3
,
6
4
6
,
4
0
0
F
H
W
A
H
S
I
P
$
3
3
,
3
0
0
$
3
2
,
4
0
0
$
1
,
0
3
1
,
4
0
0
$
2
,
3
9
4
,
9
0
0
$
0
$
3
,
4
9
2
,
0
0
0
$
3
3
,
3
0
0
$
3
2
,
4
0
0
$
1
,
0
3
1
,
4
0
0
$
2
,
3
9
4
,
9
0
0
$
0
$
3
,
4
9
2
,
0
0
0
F
H
W
A
S
T
B
G
$
5
,
7
4
9
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
1
,
2
9
0
,
6
0
0
$
1
,
2
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
8
,
2
9
9
,
6
0
0
$
5
,
7
4
9
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
1
,
2
9
0
,
6
0
0
$
1
,
2
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
8
,
2
9
9
,
6
0
0
F
H
W
A
T
A
P
$
2
7
8
,
5
6
4
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
2
7
8
,
5
6
4
$
2
7
8
,
5
6
4
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
2
7
8
,
5
6
4
F
H
W
A
S
H
R
P
2
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
F
H
W
A
R
T
P
$
7
1
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
7
1
,
0
0
0
$
7
1
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
7
1
,
0
0
0
F
T
A
5
3
0
7
$
7
2
5
,
5
9
4
$
7
2
9
,
2
2
2
$
7
3
2
,
8
6
8
$
7
3
6
,
5
3
2
$
7
4
0
,
2
1
5
$
3
,
6
6
4
,
4
3
1
$
7
2
5
,
5
9
4
$
7
2
9
,
2
2
2
$
7
3
2
,
8
6
8
$
7
3
6
,
5
3
2
$
7
4
0
,
2
1
5
$
3
,
6
6
4
,
4
3
1
F
T
A
5
3
1
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
F
T
A
5
3
1
1
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
F
T
A
5
3
1
6
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
F
T
A
5
3
2
9
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
F
T
A
5
3
3
9
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
M
o
D
O
T
M
P
E
N
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
M
o
D
O
T
S
a
f
e
t
y
$
3
,
7
0
0
$
3
,
6
0
0
$
1
1
4
,
6
0
0
$
2
6
6
,
1
0
0
$
0
$
3
8
8
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
7
0
0
$
3
,
6
0
0
$
1
1
4
,
6
0
0
$
2
6
6
,
1
0
0
$
0
$
3
8
8
,
0
0
0
M
o
D
O
T
S
t
a
t
e
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
$
1
1
,
4
1
5
$
1
1
,
4
1
5
$
1
1
,
4
1
5
$
1
1
,
4
1
5
$
1
1
,
4
1
5
$
5
7
,
0
7
5
$
1
1
,
4
1
5
$
1
1
,
4
1
5
$
1
1
,
4
1
5
$
1
1
,
4
1
5
$
1
1
,
4
1
5
$
5
7
,
0
7
5
M
o
D
O
T
S
W
I
M
B
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
M
o
D
O
T
T
C
O
S
$
3
,
2
4
6
,
4
5
0
$
7
,
0
1
9
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
4
5
1
,
6
0
0
$
4
2
6
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
1
8
,
1
4
3
,
2
5
0
$
3
,
2
4
6
,
4
5
0
$
7
,
0
1
9
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
4
5
1
,
6
0
0
$
4
2
6
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
1
8
,
1
4
3
,
2
5
0
M
o
D
O
T
S
t
a
t
e
R
a
i
l
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
C
i
t
y
$
1
,
1
8
3
,
5
5
2
$
1
,
0
4
3
,
9
1
1
$
1
,
0
4
3
,
9
1
1
$
1
,
0
4
3
,
9
1
1
$
1
,
0
4
3
,
9
1
1
$
5
,
3
5
9
,
1
9
6
$
1
,
1
8
3
,
5
5
2
$
1
,
0
4
3
,
9
1
1
$
1
,
0
4
3
,
9
1
1
$
1
,
0
4
3
,
9
1
1
$
1
,
0
4
3
,
9
1
1
$
5
,
3
5
9
,
1
9
6
C
o
l
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
O
a
t
s
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
H
o
l
t
s
S
u
m
m
i
t
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
S
t
.
M
a
r
t
i
n
s
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
O
t
h
e
r
$
1
9
6
,
5
8
9
$
1
9
8
,
5
0
5
$
2
5
0
,
5
4
0
$
2
0
2
,
4
9
4
$
2
0
4
,
4
6
8
$
1
,
0
5
2
,
5
9
6
$
1
9
6
,
5
8
9
$
1
9
8
,
5
0
5
$
2
5
0
,
5
4
0
$
2
0
2
,
4
9
4
$
2
0
4
,
4
6
8
$
1
,
0
5
2
,
5
9
6
$
1
2
,
5
0
3
,
9
6
4
$
1
7
,
7
7
1
,
0
5
3
$
1
6
,
3
3
5
,
7
3
4
$
6
,
4
9
1
,
3
5
2
$
2
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
9
$
1
2
,
5
0
3
,
9
6
4
$
1
7
,
7
7
1
,
0
5
3
$
1
6
,
3
3
5
,
7
3
4
$
6
,
4
9
1
,
3
5
2
$
2
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
9
$
5
5
,
2
5
2
,
1
1
2
$
5
5
,
2
5
2
,
1
1
2
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
e
d
F
u
n
d
s
A
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
F
u
n
d
s
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
S
t
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
l
y
T
o
t
a
l
s
T
o
t
a
l
A
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
F
u
n
d
s
T
o
t
a
l
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
e
d
T
o
t
a
l
10
Operations and Maintenance – MoDOT
Maintenance costs include MoDOT’s salaries, materials and equipment needed to deliver the roadway
and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities like minor surface
treatments such as: sealing, small concrete repairs and pothole patching; mowing right of way; snow
removal; replacing signs; striping; repairing guardrail; and repairing traffic signals. Performing these
activities requires employees; vehicles and other machinery; and materials such as salt, asphalt and fuel.
Maintenance operations expenditures are expected to increase 1.5% annually.
This makes MoDOT’s cost, $4,810 per lane mile.
Calculations are $372,986,000 / 77,537 lane miles.
Assumptions:
Maintenance Operations $472,304,000 *
Fleet Investments $ 24,607,000 *
Total $496,911,000
Minus Maintenance Fringe Benefits $123,925,000
Total $372,986,000
Lane miles 77,537 **
*Source: FY 2018 Budget approved 6/7/2017
** Source: Official 2016 State System Mileage
Operations and Maintenance - Local Government
Local revenue sources for operations and maintenance include state fuel tax, state vehicles sales/use tax,
local sales taxes, franchise fees, license and permit fees, property taxes, and other revenue sources that
provide significant resources for local general fund and specific funding of transportation. Not all taxes
and fees go to transportation, so the local jurisdiction usually will identify a budget specifically for
transportation purposes, such as capital improvements, Road and Bridge funds, transit operating
subsidies, road and street budgets, or operations and maintenance budgets.
The operations and maintenance costs for local governments include salaries, fringe benefits, materials,
and equipment needed to deliver the street and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes
basic maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as sealing, small concrete repairs, pothole
patching, mowing, snow removal, replacing signs, striping, and repairing traffic signals. These activities
may be performed in-house or outsourced.
Local government operations and maintenance on federal aid roads calculated for the system wide
average of operations & maintenance per centerline mile is $12,433 and $6,136 per lane mile plus 3
percent per year out to FY 2021, as determined by consultation with engineering and technical staff of the
11
local jurisdictions. Figure 6 shows the various roadway types in CAMPO’s MPA and the governing body
that is responsible for maintenance.
Figure 6 - Federal Aid Road Mileage by Jurisdiction.
Source: CAMPO Functional Classification GIS Database.
In addition to the local government operations and maintenance previously discussed, JEFFTRAN
expenses also cover fleet repair/maintenance, repairing/replacing bus shelters, bus washing, bus
maintenance facilities, public restrooms, and fuel. Figures 7 and 8 show the estimated expenditures for
transit operations and maintenance for JEFFTRAN and OATs, respectively.
Figure 7 - JEFFTRAN Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Operations and Maintenance revenue and expenditures are based on the most recently available budgets
and apply the inflation factor of 3 percent for FTA and City of Jefferson funding sources.
Figure 8 – OATS Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Urban
Other
Freeway
Express
way
Urban
Other
Principal
Arterial
Urban
Minor
Arterial
Urban
Collector
Rural
Other
Principal
Arterial
Rural
Minor
Arterial
Rural
Major
Collector
Total Percent of
Total
(Jurisdiction)
Callaway County 2.3 2.9 0.9 6.1 2.89%
Cole County 3.6 5.9 4.6 14.1 6.63%
Holts Summit 3.1 4.1 0.5 7.6 3.61%
City of Jefferson*4.3 37.4 23.6 65.3 30.83%
MoDOT 34.6 8.7 18.2 11.9 5.4 5.3 32.7 116.8 55.13%
St. Martins 1.5 0.5 1.9 0.91%
Taos 0.0 0.00%
Wardsville 0.0 0.00%
Total (Functional Class)34.6 13.0 66.1 48.8 5.4 6.3 37.8 211.9 100.00%
Percent (Functional Class)16.3%6.1%31.2%23.0%2.5%3.0%17.8%
*Includes Parks & Rec.
Funding Type FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
FTA Section 5307 722,000$ 722,000$ 722,000$ 722,000$ 722,000$
City of Jefferson-Local Operating Assistance 1,023,442$ 1,043,911$ 1,064,789$ 1,086,085$ 1,107,807$
MoDOT State Operating Assistance 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$
Passenger fares and Misc 170,000$ 175,000$ 180,000$ 190,000$ 195,000$
Capital Funds 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$
Total 2,051,942$ 2,077,411$ 2,103,289$ 2,134,585$ 2,161,307$
Funding Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
FTA-Section 5310 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$
Fares 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$
Local Contracts 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$
12
Financial Constraint
To exhibit financial constraint, a financial plan should address three questions:
1) What will the needs for transportation in the CAMPO planning area cost?
The needs are identified by project in the following section and costs are summarized by funding
source in Figure 4.
2) What revenues are available that can be applied to the needs?
Specific revenues available to meet the needs are identified in Figure 4 - Forecast Revenue for
Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance, by jurisdiction and source.
3) Are the revenues sufficient to cover the costs?
As shown in Figure 5 – Programmed and Available Funds by Source, programmed fund amounts
equal anticipated fund amounts. For many jurisdictions as shown in Figure 4, available funds
exceed the amounts of revenues required to fund programmed projects.
13
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $25,600 $105,600 $131,200
MoDOT TCOS $6,400 $26,400 $32,800
TIP #2013-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3015 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $492,800 $492,800
MoDOT TCOS $123,200 $123,200
Local $0
Other $0
Total $32,000 $748,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $780,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $19,200 $70,400 $158,400 $248,000
MoDOT TCOS $4,800 $17,600 $39,600 $62,000
TIP #2018-01 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3261 Other $0
FHWA NHPP $0
MoDOT TCOS $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $943,200 $943,200
MoDOT TCOS $235,800 $235,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total $24,000 $88,000 $1,377,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,489,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $204,800 $205,600 $520,000 $930,400
MoDOT TCOS $51,200 $51,400 $130,000 $232,600
TIP #2019-01 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3337 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $3,648,800 $3,648,800
MoDOT TCOS $912,200 $912,200
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $256,000 $257,000 $5,211,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,724,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $200 $200 $800 $5,800 $7,000
TIP #2019-02 Local $0
MoDOT#5P2190 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$800 $800 $3,200 $23,200 $28,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $51,400 $51,400
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$205,600 $205,600
Total $0 $1,000 $1,000 $4,000 $286,000 $0 $0 $292,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $200 $11,400 $11,600
TIP #2018-14 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3311 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$800 $45,600 $46,400
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $144,000 $144,000
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$576,000 $576,000
Total $1,000 $777,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $778,000
Comments: Project involves bridges A3451,
A4265, and A4662. Award date 2020.
Total Project Cost: $778,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:US 50 Outer Road Improvements E
N
G
Description & Location: From Big Horn Drive to
West Truman Blvd., W. Truman Blvd. to just
west of Hobbs Rd., Bus. 50 W to Rainbow Dr.
and intersection of W. Truman to Country Club
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Pavement improvements. Award date 2018.
Anticipated federal reimbursement from STBG.
Roadway Projects
Bridge Projects
Total Project Cost: $780,000
Description & Location: Bridge rehabilitation and
upgrade ADA and guardrail to the Dix Road
bridge over US 50.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Involves bridge number A1187.
Award date 2019.
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30MoDOT Funding
Project
Name:Dix Road Bridge Improvements E
N
G
Total Project Cost: $1,489,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Prior
Funding
Bridge Improvements over Route 54 E
N
G
Description & Location: Includes bridge
improvements on Route 94 over Little Tavern
Creek in Callaway County and West Main over
Route 54/63 in Cole County
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Rehabilitation On US 54 Over
Missouri River E
N
G
Description & Location:Bridge rehabilitation for
both bridges over the Missouri River in
Jefferson City.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridges A4497 and
L0550.
Total Project Cost: $5,724,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Preventative Maintenance On
US 50 Over Osage River E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge preventative
maintenance over the Osage River, 0.3 mile
west of the Route 63 junction.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridge A5552.
Anticipated federal reimbursement from STBG.
Total Project Cost: $292,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
14
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $36,000 $11,200 $528,800 $576,000
MoDOT TCOS $9,000 $2,800 $132,200 $144,000
TIP #2017-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3121 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $6,756,800 $6,756,800
MoDOT TCOS $1,689,200 $1,689,200
Local $0
Other $0
Total $45,000 $14,000 $9,107,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,166,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $80,100 $80,100
MoDOT TCOS $8,900 $8,900
TIP #2017-12 Local $0
MoDOT#0S3021F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA STBG $1,210,500 $1,210,500
MoDOT TCOS $134,500 $134,500
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,434,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,434,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $75,600 $75,600
MoDOT TCOS $8,400 $8,400
TIP #2018-05 Local $0
MoDOT#0S3022F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA STBG $1,184,400 $1,184,400
MoDOT TCOS $131,600 $131,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $1,400,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $4,000 $79,400 $85,400
TIP #2019-03 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3333 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$8,000 $16,000 $317,600 $341,600
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $1,173,000 $1,173,000
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$4,692,000 $4,692,000
Total $0 $10,000 $20,000 $6,262,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,292,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $45,000 $900 $45,900
MoDOT Safety $5,000 $100 $5,100
TIP #2013-16 Local $0
MoDOT#5S2234 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $50,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,000
Total Project Cost: $6,292,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:US 54 Pavement Improvements E
N
G
Comments: Length: Award Date 2019
R
O
W
Description & Location: ADA Transition Plan
improvements at various locations in the
Central District
R
O
W
Description & Location: ADA Transition Plan
improvements at various locations in the
Central District
R
O
W
MoDOT
Total Project Cost: $1,400,000
Total Project Cost: $1,434,000
C
O
N
S
T
Prior
Funding
Other Projects
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Comments: $1.2 million statewide transportation
alternatives funds. Award Date 2021.
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Description & Location: Pavement improvements and
guardrails on the eastbound and westbound lanes of US
54 from Route E (near Brazito) to near Stadium Blvd. in
Jefferson City.
MoDOT
Total Project Cost: $51,000
C
O
N
S
T
Enhancement Projects in Central
District E
N
G
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Enhancement Projects in Central
District E
N
G
Total Project Cost: $9,166,000
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Scoping Routes M, B & W E
N
G
Description & Location: Scoping for safety
improvements at the intersection of Route M
and Route W in Wardsville.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal funding
category: Safety.
Prior
Funding
Funding
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement Improvements on US 50 E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement improvements on
US 50 from east of West Truman Blvd. to east of Kaylor
Bridge Road, all lanes. From east of Route M to east
of Stoney Gap Road
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal reimbursement
from STBG.
Funding
Project
Name:
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:$1.2 million statewide transportation
alternatives funds. Award Date 2022.
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
15
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $144,000 $144,000
MoDOT Safety $16,000 $16,000
TIP #2018-04 Local $0
MoDOT#0P3022F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $2,250,900 $2,250,900
MoDOT Safety $250,100 $250,100
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,661,000 $0 $0 $2,661,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $400 $7,600 $8,000
TIP #2018-06 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3274 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$1,600 $30,400 $32,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $102,000 $102,000
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$408,000 $408,000
Total $2,000 $548,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $52,000 $200 $200 $200 $200 $52,800
MoDOT TCOS $13,000 $50 $50 $50 $50 $13,200
TIP #2015-07 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3081 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $65,000 $250 $250 $250 $250 $0 $0 $66,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2018-07 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3224 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $31,500 $31,500
MoDOT Safety $3,500 $3,500
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $75,000 $30,000 $105,000
TIP #2018-08 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3179 MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total $75,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000
Project
Name:Safety Projects in Central District E
N
G
Description & Location: Safety projects at
various locations in the Central District.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: $1.89 million from Open Container
funds. Award Date 2022. 90/10 Grant/match.
Total Project Cost: $2,661,000
C
O
N
S
T
R
O
W
E
N
G
Project
Name:
MoDOT
Project
Name:On-call Work Zone Enforcement E
N
G
Project
Name:
Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in
Northern Central District E
N
G
Total Project Cost: $105,000
Comments: No federal funds used for this
project.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
Total Project Cost: $36,000
MoDOT
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Description & Location: Scoping for slide
repairs in the northern portion of the Cental
District at various locations.
MoDOT
Description & Location: Job order contracting
for guard cables and guardrail repair on
various routes in the northern portion of the
Central District.
R
O
W
MoDOT
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated Federal Funding Category -
STBG. Future construction cost $2 million - 5 million.
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30Prior
Funding
Funding
MoDOT Funding
Total Project Cost: $66,000
Slide Repair Scoping
Prior
Funding
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Award Date Spring 2018.
Anticipated federal reimbursement from STBG.
Total Project Cost: $550,000
Funding Prior
Funding
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Surveying E
N
G
Description & Location: Surveying to sell
excess right of way parcels in the Central
District.
R
O
W
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30FundingPrior
Funding
16
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $8,000 $37,400 $151,200 $196,600
TIP #2018-02 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3230 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$32,000 $149,600 $604,800 $786,400
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $2,000
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$8,000 $8,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $818,800 $818,800
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$3,275,200 $3,275,200
Total $40,000 $197,000 $4,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,087,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $32,000 $407,200 $439,200
MoDOT TCOS $8,000 $101,800 $109,800
TIP #2018-03 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3259 MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA STBG $5,341,600 $5,341,600
MoDOT TCOS $1,335,400 $1,335,400
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total $40,000 $7,186,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,226,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $5,000 $5,000 $10,000
TIP #2018-09 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3254 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$20,000 $20,000 $40,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2019-04 Local $0
MoDOT#0X3121F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $1,031,400 $1,031,400
MoDOT Safety $114,600 $114,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,146,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,146,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2019-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3313 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $31,500 $31,500
MoDOT Safety $3,500 $3,500
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated Federal Category - STBG.
Includes sidewalks, curb ramps, entrances, and signals
Total Project Cost: $7,226,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:
Pavement and shoulder improvements
on Route C E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement and shoulder
improvements from Route 52 near Versailles to
Jefferson City.
Comments: 90/10 Grant/match.
Funding
Total Project Cost: $1,146,000
Prior
Funding
Description & Location: Curve safety
improvements at various locations in the
Central District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
E
N
G
MoDOT
Total Project Cost: $50,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:
Scoping for ADA Improvements in
Various Locations E
N
G
Comments: Potential ADA improvements in
Taos. Award date 2020. Anticipated Federal
Funds: STBG.
R
O
W
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Curve Safety ImprovementsProject
Name:
Description & Location:Scoping for ADA
improvements at various locations in Chamois,
Frankenstein, Route M in Taos, and Route W in
Wardsville.
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30FundingPrior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:On-call Work Zone Enforcement E
N
G
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Award date Fall 2018.
Total Project Cost: $5,087,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Pavement and shoulder improvements
on Route M E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement and shoulder
improvements from Rte. B to Rte. 50. Includes
pavements and shoulder improvements on Rte. E from
Rte. 54 to Rte. B. Project also includes pavement
improvements on Rte. W, Rte. Y and Rte. J.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
Total Project Cost: $36,000
17
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA RTP $8,000 $8,000
MoDOT $0
TIP #2017-24 Local $0
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA RTP $71,000 $71,000 $142,000
MoDOT $0
Local Parks Tax $70,000 $70,000 $140,000
Other Private Don.$19,000 $19,000
Total $168,000 $141,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $309,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA TAP $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2017-27 Local Sales Tax $0
MoDOT#MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
MoDOT $0
FHWA TAP $278,564 $278,564
MoDOT $0
Local Sales Tax $69,641 $69,641
MoDOT $0
Total $0 $348,205 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $348,205
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
Other Pass. Fares $189,692 $191,589 $193,505 $195,440 $197,394 $199,368 $1,166,988
MoDOT State Operating $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $68,490
TIP #2011-04 Local $1,115,612 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $6,335,167
MoDOT#FTA 5307 $721,984 $725,594 $729,222 $732,868 $736,532 $740,215 $4,386,415
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $2,038,703 $1,972,509 $1,978,053 $1,983,634 $1,989,252 $1,994,909 $0 $11,957,060
Pedestrian & Bicycle Projects
Total Project Cost: $309,000
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Prior
Funding
Total Project Cost: $11,957,060
City of Jefferson
Description & Location: Development of a
greenway trailhead at Community Park – a restroom,
spray ground, misting station, water fountain, bike rack,
additional parking, benches, landscaping, and lighting.
Paid for by Local Parks Sales Tax.
City of Jefferson Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Missouri Boulevard Sidewalk, Beck to
Waverly E
N
G
Description & Location: Construct a 5’ wide
sidewalk along the northern side of Missouri
Boulevard from Beck Street to Waverly Street.
Includes Bicycle/Pedestrian/Transit facilities.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: TAP Grant awardee.
Total Project Cost: $348,205
O
P
E
R
Description & Location: Operating Assistance
for JEFFTRAN service w ithin city limits of
Jefferson City (A 3% annual inflation factor
applied.)
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
C
O
N
S
T
E
N
G
Comments: The Jefferson City Cultural Arts
Foundation, Central Bank and Ameren Missouri have
pledged donations to help fund the project .
Project
Name:Operating Assistance
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30Funding
Public Transportation Projects
Funding Prior
FundingCity of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
Project
Name:Community Park Greenway Trailhead
R
O
W
18
Figure 9 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
19
Program of Projects - OATS
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA 5310 $94,053 $100,000 $194,053
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-10 Local $0
MoDOT#Other $23,513 $50,000 $73,513
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $117,566 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $267,566
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA 5310 $25,000 $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $75,000 $75,000 $375,000
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-11 Local $25,000 $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $75,000 $75,000 $375,000
MoDOT#Other $4,900 $5,000 $5,000 $5,100 $5,100 $5,100 $30,200
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $54,900 $125,000 $145,000 $145,100 $155,100 $155,100 $0 $780,200Total Project Cost: $780,200
OATS Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Operating Assistance O
P
E
R
Description & Location: Within the Jefferson
City MPO Region-Section 5310 Program for
Elderly and Handicapped
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Description & Location: Requested two (2)
vehicles to provide service in Jefferson City
and surrounding area
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Total Project Cost: $267,566
OATS
Project
Name:Capital Funding - Vehicles C
A
P
I
T
20
Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN
Multimodal Projects
In 2015, CAMPO met with federal and state planning partners in a formal planning process review.
Within two recommendations made, CAMPO was urged to include more multi-modal projects into the
TIP. CAMPO staff sent out written requests and reminders at CAMPO meetings for projects, including
those not using federal dollars. As of the writing of this document, no projects have been submitted.
However, there are a number of factors why these projects are limited. These types of projects are usually
incorporated into new road projects. Many of these types of projects are highly dependent on grants,
which may or may not be annually awarded. Projects are usually decided each budget year. There are
several bicycle or pedestrian projects in the MTP illustrative list, but projects are not constrained and
funds are not obligated.
Item Description Total
Funding by
Others Local
1 Replacement of paratransit widebody cutaway buses 150,000$ $ 120,000 30,000$
2 Update phone system 10,000$ -$ 10,000$
3 Replace paratransit software package 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
4 Rehab pavement 800 block E. Miller St.100,000$ -$ 100,000$
5 Replace low-floor minivan support vehicle 40,000$ -$ 40,000$
6 Replace transit administration vehicle 30,000$ 30,000$
7 Upgrade/replace electronic fare card system 300,000$ 240,000$ 60,000$
8 Repair Transfer Facility Roof (Bus Transfer Shelter)12,000$ -$ 12,000$
9 Transit facility improvements--ridge cap/flashing replacements/roof repair on bus barn 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
10 Security camera upgrades for transit facilities 20,000$ 16,000$ 4,000$
11 Replace outdated bus security camera systems 60,000$ 48,000$ 12,000$
12 Design work for New Transit Passenger Transfer and Admin Facility 150,000$ -$ 150,000$
13 Purchase and install bus shelters at various locations in Jefferson City 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
14 Transit facility improvements--replace overhead doors and door operators for Bus Barn 95,000$ 76,000$ 19,000$
15 JEFFTRAN lighted signs for exterior of transit facilities 15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
16 Purchase emergency back-up generator & switches for transit and CM facilities 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
17 Replace current low-floor route buses with 30 ft. low floor buses for 2020 delivery (2)1,200,000$ 960,000$ 240,000$
18 Replace current low-floor route buses with 30 ft. low floor buses for 2021 delivery (3)1,800,000$ 1,440,000$ 360,000$
19 Construct new passenger transfer and administrative facility 7,000,000$ 5,600,000$ 1,400,000$
20 Transit admin facility rehab 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
21 Transit Traveler Kiosks (each)15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
22 Bike racks at passenger transfer facilities and selected bus stops 5,000$ -$ 5,000$
23 Security gates for transit storage, maintenance and fueling facilities 20,000$ 16,000$ 4,000$
24 Charging systems/electrical upgrades for buses 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
25 Add crosswalks to various locations around the city 60,000$ -$ 60,000$
JEFFTRAN Program of Projects
Illustrative Projects
21
Appendix A – Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Amendments
TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Board
Approval
OneDOT
Approval
TIP Amendment 1
Administrative Modifications
TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Date
22
Appendix B – Federal Funding Sources
Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO planning area.
FHWA Program Eligible Activities
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/nhppfs.pd
f
The NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of
the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new
facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid
funds in highway construction are directed to support progress
toward the achievement of performance targets established in a
State's asset management plan for the NHS.
Surface Transportation Program (STP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/stbgfs.pdf
The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding
that may be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and
improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid
highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian
and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including
intercity bus terminals.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is to support a
significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all
public roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on
tribal lands
Transportation Alternatives (TA)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/transporta
tionalternativesfs.pdf
The FAST Act eliminates the MAP-21 Transportation Alternatives
Program (TAP) and replaces it with a set-aside of Surface
Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program funding for
transportation alternatives (TA). These set-aside funds include all
projects and activities that were previously eligible under TAP.
Railway-Highway Crossings (set-aside from HSIP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/railwayh
wycrossingsfst.pdf
This program funds safety improvements to reduce the number of
fatalities, injuries, and crashes at public grade crossings.
FTA Programs Eligible Activities
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/urbanized-
area-formula-grants-5307
This program provides grants to Urbanized Areas (UZA) for public
transportation capital, planning, job access and reverse commute
projects, as well as operating expenses in certain circumstances.
Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and
Individuals with Disabilities
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/enhanced-
mobility-seniors-individuals-disabilities-section-5310
This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons
with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special
needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public
transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
complementary paratransit services.
Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas
https://www.transit.dot.gov/rural-formula-grants-5311
This program provides capital, planning, and operating assistance to
states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations
less than 50,000, where many residents often rely on public transit to
reach their destinations.
Section 5329 Transit Safety & Oversight
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs
/5329_Safety_Program_Fact_Sheet.pdf
This section requires FTA to implement and maintain a national
public transportation safety program to improve the safety of all
public transportation systems that receive federal funding. The safety
program includes a national public transportation safety plan, a
safety certification training program, a public transportation agency
safety plan, and a state safety oversight program.
Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/busprogra
m
Provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses
and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities.
23
Appendix C – Policies and Procedures
Amendments
An amendment involves a major change to a project and requires approval by the Board of Directors and
Governor. An amendment is a revision that requires public review, allowance of comment, possible re-
demonstration of fiscal constraint, and includes at least one of the following:
• Addition or deletion of a project using FHWA or FTA funds (except as allowed as an administrative
modification),
• Major changes affecting project cost from FHWA or FTA sources (changes exceeding 20% of
FHWA or FTA sources of the existing project cost or changes over $2,000,000),
• Major changes in a project phase initiation date (greater than 12 months), or
• Major changes in design concept or design scope, such as changing project termini (more than 1/2
mile or 10% of the total length of the project, whichever is greater) or changing the number of
through traffic lanes that also includes a substantial increase in Federal cost.
Amendments will be initiated by the project sponsor. Amendments to delete a project can simply be
made via written correspondence identifying the project and why it is to be removed from the TIP.
Amendments to include a new project can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a
cover letter or remark in the comment section requesting inclusion in the TIP as an amendment.
Amendments for existing projects can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover
letter or remark in the comment section highlighting the change in the project and providing the CAMPO
TIP Number.
After an Amendment has been requested the process as follows:
• Staff will review the amendment for accuracy and to verify if an amendment is required or if the
change qualifies as an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if
necessary.
• The amendment will be placed on the next Technical Committee (TC) meeting agenda for review.
• The Technical Committee is an advisory board to the board of directors. Regardless of whether the
Technical Committee recommends approval of a project, does not recommend approval of a project,
or is unable to make a recommendation, the project shall still proceed to the Board of Directors to
make a final decision.
• If approval is recommended by the TC to the Board of Directors, staff will post the amendment notice
on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar day public comment period, send notices to the
appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next Board of Directors meeting agenda.
• At the Board of Directors Meeting, a public hearing will close the public comment period and a vote
for approval will be held.
If the project sponsor indicates an emergency situation upon submitting the amendment, staff will initiate
the public comment period, staff will post the amendment notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7
calendar day public comment period, send notices to the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on
the next Board of Directors meeting agenda. A public hearing will close the public comment period at the
next Board of Directors Meeting and hold a vote for approval. If this is not adequate to meet the
24
emergency situation, a special Board of Directors meeting may be called and proceed as outlined in the
Public Participation Plan.
Administrative Modifications
Revisions to the TIP and TIP projects that do not meet the criteria of an Amendment will be considered
administrative modifications including: minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to
funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation
dates. An administrative modification is a revision that neither requires committee action, public review
and comment, nor redemonstrates fiscal constraint.
An administrative modification will be initiated by the project sponsor by written communication to
CAMPO staff describing the change (phase cost, funding sources, or phase initiation date) warranting the
modification. Staff will review the administrative modification for accuracy and to verify qualification as
an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if necessary.
Upon CAMPO staff confirmation of the administrative modification requirements being met, staff will
modify the TIP appropriately, including noting the administrative modification in Appendix A of the TIP
and making changes to the project listing in the body of the TIP; notify the Board of Directors, Technical
Committee, MoDOT, FTA, and FHWA via email; draft a staff memo for the next Board of Directors and
Technical Committee meeting; and post the modified TIP notice on the CAMPO website for a minimum
of 7 calendar days.
Combining or Splitting Projects
Splitting a project into two or more projects or combining two or more projects can provide benefits to
project scheduling, cost, and logistics. A split or combination can be made via an administrative
modification to the TIP, if the project does not trigger a major change to the project as described in the
amendment section and the overall scope of work does not change.
When combining two or more projects, the financial and description information will be rolled up into the
project which was in the TIP originally and use the previous MPO TIP number. When splitting a project
into two or more projects, the financial and descriptive information will be separated appropriately into
several (two or more) projects using the same MPO TIP number, but the additional projects will include
alphabetic suffixes. The process for splitting or combining projects will follow the procedures of either
an amendment or administrative modification.
Compliance with Metropolitan Transportation Plan
For a project to be eligible for the TIP, it first must be included in the adopted MTP. Large capital
projects, roadway capacity, and/or general purpose roadway projects must be individually listed or clearly
part of a larger project included in the fiscally‐constrained component of the plan. Certain projects
seeking to improve safety, increase multi‐modal opportunities, or enhance the existing transportation
system may be programmed in the TIP without individual identification in the regional plan, so long as
they are consistent with the established goals and objectives of the plan.
25
Project Delay Policy
The goal of the Project Delay Policy for the Transportation Improvement Program is to maximize the
federal funding obligated each fiscal year and to enable the MPO to redirect funds to different projects if
any are inactive or otherwise limited from making progress. The Delay Policy applies to projects funded
through the programs for which CAMPO has oversight of project selection.
The intent of the Delay Policy is to provide an incentive for local agency sponsors to develop their
projects according to a detailed schedule and, thereby, to obligate the federal funds assigned to each
project within the timeframes initially shown in the TIP. The Delay Policy is primarily focused on
projects that involve construction or provide transportation improvements that are handled through
purchasing procedures.
In the context of this Delay Policy, a “delay” occurs when a construction-related project phase does not
get advertised within six months of the TIP program year in which its construction phase funding was
originally programmed, or changed with an amendment, in the TIP. For non-construction projects and
programs, a “delay” occurs when the “Notice to Proceed” is not issued within two months of the TIP
program year in which its implementation was originally funded in the TIP. The consequence of a delay
may be the withdrawal of its Federal funds from the TIP or other action by the Board.
Project Funding Information
When a new project is submitted for inclusion to the TIP, either during the initial development of the TIP
or as an amendment, the project sponsor is required to provide information regarding the local funding
sources in order to show fiscal constraint. The specific source of revenue, anticipated future, and any
other financial information needed to show fiscal constraint will be required.
Project Selection
The CAMPO Board of Directors adopted (Resolution 2010-04) a project prioritization and selection
process. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff and
reviewed by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of
Directors for a vote of approval. The Board of Directors may modify the project selection it deems
necessary.
Project Sponsor Commitment to Projects
Project sponsors hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring that project information contained in the TIP is
correct, that it accurately represents the scope of work being performed, and that the amount of funding
being requested is correct. The sponsor is responsible for providing CAMPO with an honest accounting
of project details including: costs, implementation schedules, and local matching fund sources, at the time
of the application for federal funds and anytime such details change. The project sponsor is also
responsible for reviewing the TIP after a project is included or modified to ensure correctness.
Scriveners’ Error
Errors made the in the ministerial functions of creating and maintaining the TIP, such as cartography,
typographical, spelling, minor word omissions, mathematical, and other error’s which do not alter the
26
intent of the TIP and have little or no impact can be performed by staff and shall not be considered a
revision to the TIP.
27
Appendix D – Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification
28
Appendix E – Definitions
Attainment area means any geographic area in which levels of a given criteria air
pollutant (e.g., ozone, carbon monoxide, PM10, PM2.5, and nitrogen dioxide) meet
the health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for that
pollutant. An area may be an attainment area for one pollutant and a nonattainment
area for others. A maintenance area (see definition below) is not considered an
attainment area for transportation planning purposes.
Available funds means funds derived from an existing source dedicated to or
historically used for transportation purposes. For Federal funds, authorized and/or
appropriated funds and the extrapolation of formula and discretionary funds at
historic rates of increase are considered available. A similar approach may be used
for State and local funds that are dedicated to or historically used for transportation
purposes.
Conformity means a Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) requirement that ensures that
Federal funding and approval are given to transportation plans, programs and
projects that are consistent with the air quality goals established by a State
Implementation Plan (SIP). Conformity, to the purpose of the SIP, means that
transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations, worsen existing
violations, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. The transportation
conformity rule (40 CFR part 93) sets forth policy, criteria, and procedures for
demonstrating and assuring conformity of transportation activities.
Cooperation means that the parties involved in carrying out the transportation
planning and programming processes work together to achieve a common goal or
objective.
Coordination means the cooperative development of plans, programs, and schedules
among agencies and entities with legal standing and adjustment of such plans,
programs, and schedules to achieve general consistency, as appropriate.
Design concept means the type of facility identified for a transportation improvement
project (e.g., freeway, expressway, arterial highway, grade separated highway, toll
road, reserved right-of-way rail transit, mixed-traffic rail transit, or busway).
Design scope means the aspects that will affect the proposed facility’s impact on the
region, usually as they relate to vehicle or person carrying capacity and control
(e.g., number of lanes or tracks to be constructed or added, length of project,
signalization, safety features, access control including approximate number and
location of interchanges, or preferential treatment for high occupancy vehicles).
Financial Plan means documentation required to be included with a metropolitan
transportation plan and TIP (and optional for the long-range statewide
transportation plan and STIP) that demonstrates the consistency between
reasonably available and projected sources of Federal, State, local, and private
revenues and the costs of implementing proposed transportation system
improvements.
Financially Constrained or Fiscal Constraint means that the metropolitan
transportation plan, TIP, and STIP includes sufficient financial information for
demonstrating that projects in the metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, and STIP
can be implemented using committed, available, or reasonably available revenue
sources, with reasonable assurance that the federally supported transportation
system is being adequately operated and maintained. For the TIP and the STIP,
financial constraint/fiscal constraint applies to each program year. Additionally,
projects in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas can be included in the
first two years of the TIP and STIP only if funds are available or committed.
Illustrative Project means an additional transportation project that may (but is not
required to) be included in a financial plan for a metropolitan transportation plan,
TIP, or STIP if reasonable additional resources were to become available.
Maintenance Area means any geographic region of the United States that the EPA
previously designated as a nonattainment area for one or more pollutants pursuant
to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and subsequently redesignated as an
attainment area subject to the requirement to develop a maintenance plan under
section 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
Major Projects - These transportation improvements are defined as projects receiving
Federal financial assistance 1) with an estimated total cost of $500 million or more
or 2) that have been identified by the FHWA as being a Major Project. The
designated projects may include those: 1) that require a substantial amount of a
State Transportation Agency's program resources, 2) that have a high level of
public or congressional attention, or 3) that have extraordinary implications for the
national transportation system.
Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) means the geographic area determined by
agreement between the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the area and
the Governor, in which the metropolitan transportation planning process is carried
out.
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) means the official multimodal
transportation plan addressing no less than a 20-year planning horizon that is
developed, adopted, and updated by CAMPO through the metropolitan
transportation planning process.
Nonattainment area means any geographic region of the United States that has been
designated by the EPA as a nonattainment area under section 107 of the Clean Air
Act for any pollutants for which an NAAQS exists.
Obligated projects means strategies and projects funded under title 23 U.S.C. and
title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for which the supporting Federal funds were authorized
and committed by the State or designated recipient in the preceding program year,
and authorized by the FHWA or awarded as a grant by the FTA.
Program of Projects (POP) is a list of projects to be funded in a grant application
submitted to FTA by a designated recipient. The POP lists the subrecipients and
indicates whether they are private non-profit agencies, governmental authorities, or
private providers of transportation service, designates the areas served (including
rural areas), and identifies any tribal entities. In addition, the POP includes a brief
description of the projects, total project cost, and Federal share for each project.
Project selection means the procedures followed by MPOs, States, and public
transportation operators to advance projects from the first four years of an approved
TIP and/or STIP to implementation, in accordance with agreed upon procedures.
Project sponsor must be a city, county, state, or other transportation related
government agency eligible to receive federal funding from the Federal Highway
or Federal Transit Administrations. All other entities must partner with a city,
county, or state agency to apply for and/or administer a transportation project.
Public transportation operator means the public entity which participates in the
continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in
accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135 and 49 U.S.C. 5303 and 5304, and is the
designated recipient of Federal funds under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for
transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and continuing general or
special transportation to the public, but does not include school bus, charter, or
intercity bus transportation or intercity passenger rail transportation provided by
Amtrak.
Regionally significant project means a transportation project (other than projects that
may be grouped in the TIP and/or STIP or exempt projects as defined in EPA’s
transportation conformity regulation (40 CFR part 93)) that is on a facility which
serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area outside
the region; major activity centers in the region; major planned developments such
as new retail malls, sports complexes, or employment centers; or transportation
terminals) and would normally be included in the modeling of the metropolitan
area’s transportation network. At a minimum, this includes all principal arterial
highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer a significant alternative
to regional highway travel.
Statewide transportation improvement program (STIP) means a statewide
prioritized listing/program of transportation projects covering a period of four years
that is consistent with the long-range statewide transportation plan, metropolitan
transportation plans, and TIPs, and required for projects to be eligible for funding
under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a document prepared by a
metropolitan planning organization that lists projects to be funded with
FHWA/FTA funds for the at least next one- to three-year period.
Unified Planning Work Plan (UPWP) is the management plan for the (metropolitan)
planning program. Its purpose is to coordinate the planning activities of all
participants in the planning process.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Board of Directors Staff Report
FY2019 Unified Planning Work Program
April 18, 2018
Summary
A Draft of the FY2019 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) has been reviewed and approved by the
CAMPO Technical Committee. The Technical Committee has recommended approval by the Board of
Directors. The UPWP is an annual statement of work, November 1 to October 31 of each year, that identifies
the planning priorities and activities to be carried out using Consolidated Planning Grant funds. The UPWP is
federally required and serves as the basis for funding agreements with the Missouri Department of
Transportation (MoDOT). The UPWP defines tasks and anticipates funding requirements for the CAMPO.
CAMPO Staff, unless otherwise identified, performs all work outlined in the UPWP. The document also
defines activities for public officials/agencies that contribute resources to the transportation planning process.
The UPWP serves as a management tool for scheduling, budgeting, and monitoring local planning activities.
Major accomplishments that will have been completed by the end of FY 2018:
• Update of the UPWP and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
• Adoption of the updated Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
• Completion and submission to FHWA of the MPO Freight Program Assessment (MPOFPA).
• Incorporation of FAST Act Performance Measures.
• A full update of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), including an updated Travel-Demand
Model, and development of a new Vision and Goals. This activity will be carried over into FY2019.
Priorities for FY2019:
• Increase and improve planning support to local transit providers.
• Continue implementation of FAST Act performance measures and targets.
• Complete MTP update activities including public outreach – visioning, goals, and objectives;
incorporation of performance measures; and travel demand model update.
• Implementation of the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
Changes/updates to the UPWP FY2019:
• Updated budget. Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funds for staff time has been exhausted
in FY2018. The only remaining STBG funds will support contracted professional services for
Visioning and Travel Demand Model activities that will occur in FY2018 and FY2019. It is
anticipated that a third of the contracted activities will occur in FY2019.
• Salaries and Direct Costs. Equipment and Training line items have been adjusted to support an
approximate staffing level of 2.3 FTEs.
• Advertising budget adjusted to accommodate for public outreach connected to the update of the MTP.
• The budget for FY2019 is approximately $200,000 less than the FY2018 budget, due to the use of
STBG funds being expended during most of FY2018 and due to a decrease in staffing and salaries.
• Incorporation of comments received from City of Jefferson, MoDOT, and FHWA.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends review of the document opening of a 7-day public comment period as required by the
CAMPO Public Participation Plan.
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to open a 7-day public comment period for the Draft FY2019 Unified Planning Work Program.
Agenda Item 6B
Unified
Planning
Work
Program
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal
Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in
this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of
Transportation.
FY 2019
November 1, 2018 to October 31, 2019
Adopted May 16, 2018
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone: (573) 634-6410
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
DRAFT
DRAFT
Table of Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1
UPWP Development ...................................................................................................................................................... 2
UPWP Modification Process ......................................................................................................................................... 2
Public Participation......................................................................................................................................................... 2
Major Tasks Completed in FY 2018 ........................................................................................................................... 2
Tasks Carried Over from FY 2018 ............................................................................................................................. 3
Financial Support for CAMPO ..................................................................................................................................... 3
Transportation Planning Factors .................................................................................................................................. 4
Work Element 1 - Program Support & Administration ............................................................................................ 5
Work Element 2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination .................................... 6
Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning ......................................................................................... 7
Work Element 4 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming .......................................................... 8
Work Element 5 - Public Transportation Planning .................................................................................................... 9
Appendix A – Financial Summary ............................................................................................................................. 10
Appendix B – CAMPO Boundary Map .................................................................................................................... 12
DRAFT
DRAFT
Insert Adoption Resolution
DRAFT
DRAFT
Insert Planning Process Certification
DRAFT
DRAFT
Insert Certification of Restrictions on Lobbying
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Board of Directors
Chairman – Jeff Hoelscher, Eastern District Commissioner, Cole County
Vice-Chairman – Ron Fitzwater, City Council Member, City of Jefferson
City of Jefferson
Larry Henry, City Council Member
Ken Hussey, City Council Member
Erin Wiseman, City Council Member
Matt Morasch, PE, Director, Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning & Protective
Services
Cole County
Larry Benz, PE, Director, Public Works
Doug Reece, City Administrator, St. Martins
Callaway County
Roger Fischer, Western District Commissioner
Holts Summit
Rick Hess, City Administrator, City of Holts Summit
Missouri Department of Transportation
David Silvester, PE, District Engineer
Ex-Officio Members
Randall Allen, Jefferson City Area Chamber of Commerce
Cathy Brown, Office of Administration, Facilities
Management, Design and Construction
Marty Wilson, Callaway County Economic Development
Enos Han, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri
Division
Michael Henderson, AICP, Missouri Department of
Transportation, Transportation Planning
Dion Knipp, Missouri Department of Transportation,
Transit Section
Jeremiah Shuler, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Technical Committee
Chairman – Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning and Protective Services, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman – David Bange, PE, Engineering Supervisor, Dept. of Public Works, City of Jefferson
City of Jefferson
Todd Spalding, Director, Parks, Recreation & Forestry
Matt Morasch, PE, Director of Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Eric Barron, AICP, Planning Manager
Britt Smith, PE, Operations & Maintenance
Cole County
Larry Benz, PE, Director of Public Works
Eric Landwehr, PE, County Engineer
Callaway County
Paul Winkelmann, PE, County Highway Administrator
Small City Representative - Callaway
Mark Tate, Streets Department, City of Holts Summit
Small City Representative - Cole
Paul Stonner/Brian Schrimpf, Wardsville
Missouri Department of Transportation
Steve Engelbrecht, PE, District Planning Manager
Michael Henderson, AICP, Transportation Planning
Specialist
Bob Lynch, PE, Area Engineer
Private Transportation Interest
Joe Scheppers, N.H. Scheppers Distributing Company.
Pedestrian or Biking Interest
Cary Maloney
Ex-Officio Members:
Jeremiah Shuler, Federal Transit Administration,
Region VII
Enos Han, Federal Highway Administration: Missouri
Division
CAMPO Staff
Sonny Sanders, AICP, GISP, PTP – Director, Planning & Protective Services
Eric Barron, AICP - Planning Manager
Katrina Williams, GISP, AICP – Transportation Planner
Alex Rotenberry, AICP - Transportation Planner
Anne Stratman – Administrative Assistant
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 1
Introduction
The Fiscal Year 2019 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) defines tasks and anticipates
funding requirements for the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO).
CAMPO is responsible for transportation planning in a continuing, cooperative and
comprehensive manner. CAMPO Staff, unless otherwise identified, performs all work. The UPWP
serves to define activities for all public officials and agencies that contribute resources to the
transportation planning process. The UPWP covers one fiscal year, November 1 to October 31
of each year, and outlines activities to be funded through the Consolidated Planning Grant and
local funds. The UPWP also serves as a management tool for scheduling, budgeting, and
monitoring the local planning activities. The UPWP serves as the basis for funding agreements
with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT).
CAMPO is the designated metropolitan planning
organization for the Jefferson City urbanized area. The
CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) boundary was
delineated by the CAMPO Board of Directors and approved
by the Governor in 2013 (see Appendix B). The MPA includes
the jurisdictions of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins,
Taos, Wardsville, and portions of unincorporated, non-
urbanized areas within Cole and Callaway Counties.
The CAMPO Board of Directors is composed of elected and
appointed officials from local jurisdictions, selected state
agencies, and Federal transportation representatives serving
as ex-officio members; and a Technical Committee that
consists of representatives from member agencies’
professional staffs and acts in an advisory capacity. A
memorandum of understanding between members identifies
the City of Jefferson as the administrator of CAMPO, and as
such, provides staffing for CAMPO. For FY2019, the City of
Jefferson will provide staff consisting of two full time
transportation planners. The City also provides part time
support from the Director of Planning and Protective
Services, a Planning Manager, and an Administrative
Assistant.
Priorities for FY2019
• Increase and improve planning support to local transit
providers.
• Continue implementation of FAST Act performance
measures and targets.
• Complete Metropolitan Transportation Plan update
activities including public outreach – visioning, goals, and
objectives; incorporation of performance measures; and
travel demand model update activities.
• Implementation of the Capital Area Pedestrian and
Bicycle Plan.
Challenges
Transportation agencies are
challenged in finding sufficient
and reliable sources of funding
for operations, maintenance, and
improving efficiency and
accessibility. More fuel efficient
cars and fewer vehicle miles
travelled, combined with the
federal fuel tax not being raised
since 1997, has caused the
Federal Highway Trust Fund to
become insolvent and require
support from general revenue
fund infusions to cover shortfalls.
Similar challenges are occurring
at the state level. According to
a 2018 American Petroleum
Institute report, Missouri has the
48th lowest state gas tax, at
$0.173 per gallon in the nation.
According to the Missouri Public
Transit Association, Missouri
ranks 44th nationally in public
transportation funding, with 9
cents per capita being spent to
fund public transportation.
A challenge in the CAMPO
region is the ability to provide
transportation alternatives to
private vehicle ownership. Many
low income individuals and/or
individuals with disabilities are
not able to drive private vehicles
and rely instead on public
transportation, walking, or biking
as their primary mode of
transportation.
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 2
UPWP Development
This UPWP is developed following the guidelines found in Chapter II Metropolitan
Transportation Planning, Appendix A, and Appendix B of FTA C 8100.1C, 9/1/2008. CAMPO staff
reviewed previous years’ time required for activities to determine time allocations for this
UPWP. Because the MPO is administered by the City of Jefferson, CAMPO accommodates the
city’s budgeting process/schedule and execution of the Consolidated Planning Grant agreement
and must begin the development of the UPWP several months prior to the fiscal year for which
the UPWP covers. CAMPO presents a draft UPWP to the Board of Directors a few months prior
to the beginning of the fiscal year. This early start presents difficulties in assuming future tasks
which may surface after adoption of the UPWP and in documenting activities occurring in the
previous year.
UPWP Modification Process
The UPWP can be modified two ways:
• Through a modification in the “scope of work” which allows for changes in tasks to be
performed, or
• Through an amendment process, which also allows for a change in tasks, but with
changes in the total amount of funding reimbursement agreed upon between the
Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission and CAMPO.
Public Participation
Federal law requires CAMPO to develop a public involvement program to involve the
community early and continuously in the transportation planning process. A proactive public
program which provides information, timely public notice, and public access to key decisions is
included in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan. During the development of the 2019 UPWP,
the document is scheduled to be discussed at monthly Board of Directors and Technical
Committee meetings from February to June, and concludes with a public comment period.
Draft copies of the UPWP as part of the meeting agendas and meeting minutes regarding UPWP
development are available to view on the CAMPO website. In accordance with the CAMPO Title
VI Policy, any and all documents produced by CAMPO, may be requested in other formats by
contacting CAMPO staff at City Hall or by calling (573)634-6536.
Major Tasks Completed in FY 2018
There were a number of projects completed by staff, consultants, or both during FY 2018.
• Staff completed the annual update of the Unified Planning Work Program and the
Transportation Improvement Program.
• Adoption of the updated Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
• Completion and submission to FHWA of the MPO Freight Program Assessment (MPOFPA).
• Incorporation of FAST Act Performance Measures into the CAMPO TIP and MTP. These
performance measures include targets for safety and road and bridge improvements.
• A full update of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), otherwise known as the Long
Range Transportation Plan, including use of a consultant to update of the Travel-Demand
Model, and develop new Vision and Goals began in FY2018. Staff used Scenario Planning
software to assist in the update. Staff also engaged in a large amount of public outreach
during this process. The MTP update process will continue into FY2019.
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 3
Tasks Carried Over from FY 2018
The MTP Goals and Vision and the Travel Demand Model / List of Recommended Improvements
have been combined into one professional services contract. The project was originally
identified in the FY 2016 UPWP, but due to issues with funding obligations, staffing levels, and
contract negotiations, the process began in the spring of FY 2018. It is anticipated that
approximately 33% of the project will carry over into FY 2019.
Appendix A provides more detailed breakdown of financial details.
Financial Support for CAMPO
The total CAMPO budget for FY 2019 is $254,633 using two sources of federal funding.
CAMPO receives most of its funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5303 funds through the Missouri Department of
Transportation (MoDOT). Funding is provided through the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG)
consisting of 80% federal funding and 20% local funding.
In FY 2019 Federal Surface Transportation Block Grants (STBG) funds will also be utilized at the
same levels of 80% federal and 20% local. STBG funds will only be used for contracted
professional services in FY 2018 and FY 2019.
The 20% local matching funds for both federal funding sources is provided by the City of
Jefferson and Cole County. Of the 20% local funding, Jefferson City contributes 75% and Cole
County contributes 25%.
Appendix A provides more detailed breakdown of financial details.
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 4
Transportation Planning Factors
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), passed into law in 2015, identifies
ten planning factors required for consideration in any MPO planning activities, including in the
development of the UPWP, MTP, and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Figure 1
provides an overview of those planning factors and how they are addressed by each work
element in the UPWP. A detailed overview of each work element can be found in the following
pages.
Figure 1: Planning Factors as addressed by work elements
Planning Factor
Work Program Element
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
1
-
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Su
p
p
o
r
t
&
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
2
-
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
3
-
Lo
n
g
Ra
n
g
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
4
-
Sh
o
r
t
Ra
n
g
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
or
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
&
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
i
n
g
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
5
-
Pu
b
l
i
c
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan
area, especially by enabling global competitiveness,
productivity, and efficiency.
B. Increase the safety of the transportation system for
motorized and nonmotorized users.
C. Increase the security of the transportation system for
motorized and nonmotorized users.
D. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people
and for freight.
E. Protect and enhance the environment, promote
energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and
promote consistency between transportation
improvements and State and local planned growth and
economic development patterns.
F. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the
transportation system, across and between modes, for
people and freight.
G. Promote efficient system management and
operation.
H. Emphasize the preservation of the existing
transportation system.
I. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the
transportation system and reduce or mitigate
stormwater impacts of surface transportation.
J. Enhance travel and tourism.
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 5
Work Element 1 - Program Support & Administration
This task covers the activities necessary to carry out the daily activities of CAMPO in support of
the transportation planning process. These include meeting preparation, UPWP development,
public outreach activities, reporting, and professional development activities.
Accomplishments during FY2018
Board of Directors and Technical Committee monthly meetings were held, with a few
cancellations in FY 2018. The UPWP, quarterly progress reports, Annual Listing of Obligated
Projects, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Commitments Semi-Annual reports, and
other required reporting documents were produced in a timely manner. Staff participated in
various professional development activities, including MoDOT sponsored events, webinars, and
other training opportunities.
Objectives / Activities
• Manage CAMPO activities in order to comply with
Federal and State administrative requirements and
guidance. Support the operations of the Board of
Directors and Technical Committee, communicate
and coordinate with Federal and State agencies on
MPO activities, and support day-to-day operations.
• Develop the annual budget and Unified Planning
Work Program along with the preparation and
submittal of UPWP quarterly progress reports,
billings, and invoices. Modify UPWP as needed
with approval from the necessary authority.
• Facilitate public participation such as public
meetings, hearings and workshops, as needed and
in accordance with the Public Participation Plan.
Provide access to CAMPO activities through
maintenance and updating of the CAMPO website.
• Fulfill reporting requirements related to Title VI,
Disadvantage Business Enterprise requirements,
project obligation, and other topics as required.
• Professional Development activities, including
attendance at relevant training sessions,
educational seminars, meetings, and conferences.
Products for FY 2019
• Board of Directors and Technical
Committee meetings.
• Meeting agendas, minutes,
presentations, reports, and other
support material.
• FY 2020 UPWP.
• End of year report, quarterly
progress reports, billings, and
invoices.
• Annual List of Obligated Projects
from the previous program year.
• DBE Commitments Semi-Annual
reports.
• Participation in professional
development activities.
Responsible Party
CAMPO staff.
Funding
Local Match Funds $5,333 (20%)
Federal CPG Funds $21,334 (80%)
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 6
Work Element 2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning
Coordination
Not all of the CAMPO member organizations have planning staff or current comprehensive
planning documents in place. In order to facilitate transportation planning by incorporating the
vision and goals for the member organizations and the public, CAMPO will provide assistance in
the crafting of the transportation component of local comprehensive planning documents, as
practical. This task may include the development and maintenance of related spatial and non-
spatial data collection and analysis; examples include land use, demographic data, housing,
human services, environmental/natural resources, recreation/open space, and public facilities.
Accomplishments during FY2018
Staff provided technical assistance in various grant application processes for transportation
related projects with in the CAMPO area. CAMPO staff also provided pro bono publico services
such as: participation in the development of local comprehensive plans of member
organizations, provided geospatial analysis/data (elevations, demographic, sidewalk, bicycle
facilities, street right-of-way, etc.) to support development, and grant application activities. In
preparation of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan, staff trained to use Scenario Planning
software to assist in the process of developing a new Vision and Goals as part of the MTP
update process.
Objectives / Activities
• Provide technical planning assistance to CAMPO
members in the development of the transportation
component of comprehensive and other planning
documents, including geospatial analytical support
and databases.
• Assist jurisdictions in the acquisition and use of
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and other
data for use in plans, transportation grant
applications, measuring performance, and
forecasting provided by the US Census, MoDOT
and others.
Products for FY 2019
• Various inputs for comprehensive
planning documents - ongoing for
multiple years.
• Various GIS databases.
• Continue providing technical
assistance for the transportation
component of local planning
documents.
Responsible Party
CAMPO staff and local jurisdictions.
Local jurisdictions have ultimate
responsibility for the development
and publishing of their planning
documents.
Funding
Local Match Funds $4,923 (20%)
Federal CPG Funds $19,693 (80%)
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 7
Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning
This work provides for long-range transportation planning activities, studies, and plans
supporting the transportation planning process out to a minimum of 20 years, for the CAMPO
metropolitan planning area, and may include both system level planning activities and project
level activities.
Accomplishments during FY2018
Staff conducted public participation activities involving key stakeholder, business community,
advocacy groups, environmental organizations, and the public in long range transportation
planning activities to achieve the community's long-term transportation goals and vision for the
Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Staff commenced the travel demand model project. Staff
and a consultant began visioning and updating the travel demand model and list of
recommended improvements. Staff, working with MoDOT, began setting federal performance
measures for the TIP and MTP. Staff participated in a project prioritization process aimed at
demonstrating to the state legislature what could be accomplished with additional funding over
the next 10 years. The final list was forwarded to the State legislature by MoDOT.
Objectives / Activities
• Keep the MTP current by maintaining and
amending components of the plan such as major
land use changes, major road changes, process
improvements, funding, or new regulations and
legislation; and any projects to be included into the
TIP that are not already listed in the MTP.
• Involve key stakeholders, business community and
advocacy groups, environmental organizations, and
the public in long range transportation planning
activities to achieve the long-term transportation
goals and vision of the MTP.
• Report MPO performance targets in relation to
performance measures for the MTP and TIP.
• Continue the update process of visioning, as well as
the Travel Demand Model and subsequent
transportation study to identify areas with a low
level of service and provide recommended
improvements to these areas.
Products for FY 2019
• Completeion of the MTP update,
including vision, goals and
strategies derived through
regional public outreach.
• Amendments to the MTP as
necessary.
• Report MTP and TIP performance
measures and targets.
• Complete work on the visioning
and Travel Demand Model and
List of Recommended
improvements.
Responsible Party
CAMPO staff and consultant.
Visioning/goals and Travel Demand
Model/Study will be completed by
a consultant.
Funding
Local Match Funds $19,693 (20%)
Federal CPG Funds $78,771 (80%)
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 8
Work Element 4 - Short Range Transportation Planning &
Programming
To identify and address immediate or short term transportation needs which may include non-
motorized planning activities, freight planning, bicycle/pedestrian planning, safety planning,
operations and management planning, transportation security planning, or wayfinding activities.
Accomplishments during FY2018
In FY2018 staff participated in activities, meetings and conferences including Missouri Coalition
for Roadway Safety – Central Region and STIP project review/discussions. Completed Program
Year 2019 – 2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
Objectives / Activities
• Provide support for short-range transportation
planning by CAMPO and its members.
• Participate in regional activities regarding freight,
safety, security, bicycle/pedestrian, non-motorized,
and other related planning activities.
• Implement the goals and strategies outlined in the
Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
• Maintain the current TIP through the Amendment
and Administrative Modifications process that
meets statutory requirements, maintain fiscal
constrain, and support changing sponsor priorities
and project scope.
• Develop the new Program Year TIP.
Products for FY 2019
• TIP amendments and
administrative modifications as
necessary
• Program Year 2020-2024 TIP.
Responsible Party
CAMPO staff.
Funding
Local Match Funds $4,103 (20%)
Federal CPG Funds $16,411 (80%)
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 9
Work Element 5 - Public Transportation Planning
To assist public transportation and transit providers in fulfilling State, Local, and Federal
requirements for coordination and cooperative transportation planning through assistance with
plan development, technical assistance, mapping, data, and GIS functions.
Accomplishments during FY2018
In FY2018 staff provided assistance to JEFFTRAN staff in regard to their implementation of the
JEFFTRAN System-Wide Assessment. Staff assisted JEFFTRAN with geospatial analysis of
demographics, future land use, and possible route changes. CAMPO staff worked with
JEFFTRAN staff to use and analyze data collected as part of the installation of the automatic
passenger counters.
Objectives / Activities
• Continue to assist JEFFTRAN with the maintaining
the Route and Schedule Guide, individual route
maps and other tools to serve JEFFTRAN patrons.
• Provide JEFFTRAN mapping, demographic, GIS,
planning and other technical assistance in support
of reporting requirements and evaluating possible
changes in types of transit services offered.
• Participate in transit planning activities that support
the goals and objectives laid out in the Coordinated
Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
• Continue collaboration with other regional transit
providers to improve efficiency and access in Mid-
Missouri.
Products for FY 2019
• Update route and schedule guide
as needed.
• Maps, demographics, GIS
analytics.
• Improved service to patrons of
JEFFTRAN.
• Collaboration with regional
transit providers to meet shared
goals.
Responsible Party
CAMPO staff.
Funding
Local Match Funds $6,975 (20%)
Federal CPG Funds $27,898 (80%)
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 10
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Anticipated Expenditures
*Numbers have been rounded to the nearest whole number.
** The City of Jefferson covers all the Utility and Capital Purchases expenses, except for some specific software
licenses used for publishing or mapping.
Federal - CPG Local Total
Salaries plus benefits $152,963 $38,241 $191,204
Labor Total $152,963 $38,241 $191,204
Materials & Supplies
Advertising $1,440 $360 $1,800
Postage $160 $40 $200
Printing $100 $25 $125
Copies $8 $2 $10
Office Supplies $800 $200 $1,000
Food $200 $50 $250
Operational Supplies $1,296 $324 $1,620
Subtotal $4,004 $1,001 $5,005
Other Contracted Services
Dues & Publications $1,200 $300 $1,500
Training/Education/Meetings/Conferen $4,800 $1,200 $6,000
Subtotal $6,000 $1,500 $7,500
Equipment Repair and Maintenance
Vehicle Wash $0 $0 $0
Maintenance Agreement $600 $150 $750
Subtotal $600 $150 $750
Capital Purchases and Utilities**
Equipment/software $540 $135 $675
Subtotal $540 $135 $675
Total Direct Costs $11,144 $2,786 $13,930
Total Labor and Direct Costs $164,107 $41,027 $205,134
Federal - STBG Local Total
Travel Demand Model/Visioning $39,600 $9,900 $49,500
Total Combined MPO Budget $203,707 $50,927 $254,634
FY 2019 MPO Budget*
Federal STBG Contracted Professional Services
Direct Costs
Labor
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 11
Anticipated Revenue
Work Element Funding Summary - Consolidated Planning Grant and Local Funds
* Numbers have been rounded to the nearest whole number.
FY 2019 Surface Transportation Block Grant Funding Summary
FY 2019 Local Match by Jurisdiction
Anticipated Consolidated Planning Grant Balance
Consolidated Planning Grant Balance
* Due to staffing changes, it is anticipated that only 70% of the $206,563 FY 2018 budget will be utilized.
1 - Program Support & Administration $21,334 $5,333 $26,667 13%
2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning $19,693 $4,923 $24,616 12%
3 - Long Range Transportation Planning $78,771 $19,693 $98,464 48%
4 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming $16,411 $4,103 $20,513 10%
5 - Public Transportation Planning $27,898 $6,975 $34,873 17%
Total*$164,107 $41,027 $205,134 100%
Percent of
Work
ProgramWork Element Total
Federal
CPG Funds
80%
Local
Match
20%
Contracted Professional Services Federal STBG
Funds 80%
Local Match
20%Total
Travel Demand Model/Visioning $39,600 $9,900 $49,500
Jurisdiction CPG
Local Match
STBG
Local Match Total
City of Jefferson Share (75%)$30,770 $7,425 $38,195
Cole County Share (25%)$10,257 $2,475 $12,732
Total 2019 UPWP Local Match $41,027 $9,900 $50,927
CPG Balance for end of FY2017 $358,272
FY 2018 CPG Expenditure - Estimated*$144,594
Subtotal $213,678
FY 2018 CPG Allocation - Estimated $150,559
CPG Funds Available for FY 2019 - Estimated $364,237
DRAFT
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2019 UPWP 12
Appendix B – CAMPO Boundary Map
The CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) Boundary was approved by the CAMPO
Board of Directors January 16, 2013 and was approved by the Governor of Missouri
March 12, 2013. The MPA includes the jurisdictions of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St.
Martins, Taos, Wardsville, and portions of unincorporated, non-urbanized areas within
Cole and Callaway Counties.
DRAFT
DRAFT
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Board of Directors Staff Report
Status of Current Work Tasks
April 18, 2018
Summary
The following list includes work tasks that are currently in progress or have been completed since the previous
Technical Committee meeting:
• TIP update. See attached staff report.
• UPWP update. See attached staff report.
• Visioning and Travel Demand Model Update. The contract for professional services has been
approved by the City Council and has been forwarded to the consultant for signature. It is hoped, after
final review by OneDOT (Federal Highway and Transit Administration staff), that a notice to proceed
will be received by late April.
• MTP Update. Staff continues the process of updating the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The
Visioning and Travel Demand Model update will feed into the update process over the next year.
Staff has begun Community Viz software tutorials to support analysis used in the update.
• Staff is assisting the Convention and Visitor’s Bureau with a map for their new bicycling webpage
(https://www.visitjeffersoncity.com/biking-jefferson-city).
• Staff is working with JEFFTRAN on reviewing passenger count data and recommendations from the
System-Wide Assessment. CAMPO staff, working with staff from the GIS division, are facilitating
creation of a mapping platform to assist in data analysis.
• Staff is reviewing MoDOT’s Draft Long Range Transportation Plan, which is available here:
http://www.modot.org/LRTP/ (comments accepted by the public until May 3)
• Staff is reviewing MoDOT’s Public Involvement Plan. Interested persons may review the plan at:
www.modot.org/plansandprojects/documents/EPGPublicInvolvementforPlanningProcessX.pdf and
submit comments to michael.henderson@modot.mo.gov. The 45-day comment period will run
through May 7, 2018.
Agenda Item 7A