HomeMy Public PortalAbout2019-02-07 packet
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats
as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Technical Committee
Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.
Meeting Location: Boone/Bancroft Room # 200, John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 - Enter through Main Lobby
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
2. Public comment
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of December 6, 2018
5. Communication Received
A. Freight Enhancement Program
6. Old Business
A. 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Development
Action Requested: Review and discussion.
Staff Report: Scenarios have been submitted to consultant to develop travel demand models. Staff anticipates
a draft of the MTP being presented to the Technical Committee by April.
7. New Business
A. Federal Performance Measures
Action Requested: Review, discussion, and recommendation forwarding the updated 2019 Safety Performance
targets to the Board of Directors.
Staff Report: Refer to staff report on the update of the safety federal performance measures targets and how
they were determined by MoDOT.
B. 2020-2024 Transportation Improvement Program Update
Action Requested: Discussion.
Staff Report: CAMPO staff is working on the annual update of the Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP). CAMPO staff will contact all CAMPO member jurisdictions for budget information, to review existing
projects in the TIP, and ask for projects for inclusion into the new TIP. Staff anticipates a draft of the TIP being
presented to the Technical Committee by April.
C. 2020 Unified Planning Work Program Update
Action Requested: Discussion.
Staff Report: CAMPO staff is working on the annual update of the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
The UPWP serves two functions: 1) the budget for CAMPO and 2) determining work products between
November 1 2019 and October 31, 2020. Staff anticipates a draft of the UPWP being presented to the
Technical Committee by April.
8. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
B. Member Updates
C. Election of Officers
9. Next Meeting Date – Thursday, March 7, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room #200
10. Adjournment
Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457
MINUTES
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
December 6, 2018
VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT
Cole County: Larry Benz
Eric Landwehr
Jefferson City: David Bange, Vice Chairman
Eric Barron
Mark Mehmert
Sonny Sanders, Chairman
Britt Smith
MoDOT: Mike Henderson
Steve Engelbrecht
Bob Lynch
Wardsville: Paul Stonner
Pedestrian or Biking Interest: Cary Maloney
VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT
Paul Winkelmann, Callaway County
Mark Tate, Holts Summit
JJ Gates, Jefferson City
Matt Morasch, Jefferson City
Joe Scheppers, Private Transportation Interest
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration
Jeremiah Shuler, Federal Transit Administration
STAFF PRESENT (Non-Voting)
Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner
Alex Rotenberry, Transportation Planner
Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant
GUESTS PRESENT
Kim Tipton, MoDOT
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
Mr. Sanders called the meeting to order at 10:03 a.m. and asked Ms. Stratman to call roll. A quorum of 12
voting members present.
2. Public comment
None received.
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed unanimously.
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of November 1, 2018
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of November 1, 2018 as
written. The motion passed unanimously.
5. Communications from the presiding officer
No correspondence was received.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
December 6, 2018 Page 2
6. Old Business
A. 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Development
Vision, Goals and Strategies
Ms. Williams explained that a stakeholder meeting was held on November 13 to start the process of
developing the Vision Statement, Goals, and Strategies. Attendees developed a list of nine goals and more
than 40 strategies. These draft goals and strategies are the heart of the MTP document and guide the
development of programs, policies, and projects within CAMPO. She stated that the Vision Statement is as
follows: CAMPO will maintain and support a resilient multi-modal network that improves quality of life and
promote economic vitality through planning for smart community growth. Ms. Williams explained that the
goals and strategies are as follows: (1) Improve safety and security for all travel modes; (2) Support economic
development and tourism throughout the region; (3) Support regional partnerships and planning continuity
across the region; (4) Improve efficiency in system management, operations, and movement of people and
freight; (5) Support land use practices that promote quality of life and economic vitality; (6) Seek secure and
reliable funding; (7) Improve accessibility and mobility; (8) Maintain a resilient transportation system; (9)
Provide a platform for multi-modal transportation education. She stated that staff recommends that committee
members provide feedback after reviewing the goals and strategies.
Illustrative Project List Development
Ms. Williams explained that staff is in the process of reviewing and compiling an illustrative list of
projects, as federally required. She stated that this list includes projects that have been identified as needs in
the region that, given funding, may be completed in the next 10 to 25 years. Ms. Williams explained that staff
recommends formation of a work group with a representative from each jurisdiction to establish criteria to
categorize projects into categories or tiers and evaluate them.
Mr. Mehmert moved and Mr. Landwehr seconded to form a work group with a representative from each
jurisdiction. The motion passed unanimously.
7. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
• JEFFTRAN Route Guide support.
• Federal Safety Performance Measures
• 2020-2024 Transportation Improve Plan Development
• Admin Modification to the 2019 Unified Planning Work Program. Adjust budget to roll over
Surface Transportation Block Grant funds for the Visioning and Travel Demand Model Consultant
Services to FY2019.
• 2020 Unified Planning Work Program
• Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) Grant Update. The Board of Directors ranked the
following applications submitted within the CAMPO Region: (1) City of Jefferson – Missouri
Boulevard Sidewalks; (2) City of St Martins – Business 50 West Bicycle/Pedestrian and ADA
Safety Improvements and Resurfacing; (3) City of Jefferson – West Main Street to Runge Nature
Center Pedestrian Connection; and (4) City of Holts Summit – South Summit School Sidewalk
Connection Project. MoDOT and four planning partners will meet on December 19 to decide
which TAP Grant will be awarded.
B. Member Updates
Cole County
--Mr. Landwehr gave an update on the following: (1) Tanner Bridge and Tara Road safety
improvements; (2) Replacement of certain bridges and box culverts; and (3) Business 50 West Phase
II.
Jefferson City
--Mr. Bange gave an update on the following: (1) Dunklin Street Bridge replacement; (2) Clark
Avenue Traffic Study; (3) Sidewalk and curb on E. High Street between Pine Street and Vetter Lane;
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
December 6, 2018 Page 3
(3) Bike striping on Miller Street to connect East Branch Greenway and Miller Street Greenway; (4)
Shared bike lane markings on West Main Street from the Clay Street Bike Plaza to Highway 179.
--Mr. Barron reported that the Planning Division has undertaken major rezonings in the Southside Area
from Multifamily Residential to Single Family Residential.
--Mr. Mehmert reported that the route reconfigurations went into effect on December 3, 2018.
--Mr. Smith gave an update on the following: Airport Master Plan and City of Jefferson and Cole
County joint project for pavement management.
Missouri Department of Transportation
--Mr. Henderson reported that Proposition D did not pass and that MoDOT will continue to deliver
projects that have been programmed.
8. Next Meeting Date - Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room.
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 10:51 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
MTP Plan Development
February 7, 2019
Summary
CAMPO continues the update of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). This memo stands as an update
on a few specific activities being undertaken by staff and consultants:
Public Survey Results
A public survey closed on October 31 with staff receiving 92 responses. A report on the survey results was
given at the November 2018 Technical Committee meeting. A full report of the survey results and other
materials and documents relating to the planning process can be found at www.campo2045.com.
Vision, Goals, and Strategies
Staff reviewed the goals and strategies at the December 2018 Technical Committee Meeting. A stakeholder
meeting was held on November 13th to start the process of developing the Vision statement, Goals, and
Strategies. Attendees developed a list of nine goals and more than 40 strategies. These draft goals and
strategies are the heart of the MTP document and guide the development of programs, policies, and projects
within CAMPO. The goals and strategies are available for review at www.campo2045.com.
Illustrative Project Prioritization
At the December 2018 meeting Technical Committee members decided to form a work group to review and
prioritize illustrative projects. This list includes projects that have been identified as needs in the region that,
given funding, may be completed in the next 10 to 25 years. Staff anticipates having the work group meet in
late February or early March after receiving updated Travel Demand Model data from consultants.
Scenarios and Travel Demand Model Development
Staff has completed and submitted four land-use development scenarios to the consultants to be used in the
development of the Travel Demand Model (TDM). The scenarios included:
• “Trend” – This scenario reflects an anticipated development based on current trends. The Trend
Scenario looked at current landuse, 20-30 years of population growth, adopted plans and policies,
zoning, and stakeholder input.
• “Central City Development” – This scenario uses the Trend Scenario as a base and then imagines
more infill in downtown Jefferson City. A filling in of vacant or abandoned properties with residential
and commercial development that is consistent with recent neighborhood plans and changes in zoning.
• “Unincorporated Growth” – This scenario uses the Trend Scenario as a base and then imagines more
intensive development of the unincorporated portions of the CAMPO region just west of Jefferson
City and just outside of Holts Summit.
• “Triple Growth” – This scenario uses the Trend Scenario as a base and then imagines 3 times the
residential growth as compared to the Trend.
Each scenario is used to create a TDM that will identify potential points of congestion and capacity issues.
After a preferred scenario is identified, the data will be used to develop a list of recommended improvements.
Additionally, staff also developed scenarios that looked at potential sanitary sewer expansion and roadway
connections identified in the previous TDM. Of the seven scenarios developed, only 4 were submitted for
TDM development, per the consultant contract. An upcoming public meeting will present all of this data to the
public and stakeholders.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that committee members attend the public meeting and continue to review and provide
feedback as they see fit.
Agenda Item 6A
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Federal Safety Performance Measures Update
February 7, 2019
Summary
Within the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, the Federal Highway Administration
established 5 performance measures to assess performance and carry out the Highway Safety Improvement
Program: (1) number of fatalities, (2) rate of fatalities per VMT, (3) number of serious injuries, (4) rate of
serious injuries per VMT, and (5) number of combined non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious
injuries.
CAMPO must adopt safety targets, as outlined in the FAST Act, by February 27, 2019. MPOs may choose
between programing projects (1) in support of all the State targets, (2) establishing specific numeric targets for
all of the performance measures, or (3) establishing specific numeric targets for one or more individual
performance measures and supporting the State target on other performance measures.
Performance Measure
5-Year
Rolling
Average
(2013-2017)
5-year Rolling
Average Statewide
Target for CY2019
Number of Fatalities 854.4 872.3
Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 1.176 1.160
Number of Serious Injuries 4756.4 4433.8
Serious Injury Rate per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 6.566 6.168
Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 441.3 445.4
Targets based on 9% fatality reduction, 5% serious injury reduction, 1% VMT increase and 4% non-
motorized reduction
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that CAMPO adopt the state targets, all of which are the targets established by MoDOT.
While the state safety targets are an important measure with respect to transportation planning, there are no
repercussions to the CAMPO area for failing to achieve safety targets.
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to forward the adoption of the safety targets established by MoDOT to the Board of Directors for
approval.
Agenda Item 7A
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
2020-2024 Transportation Improvement Program Update
February 7, 2019
Summary
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to
be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which are funded by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed ‘regionally significant.’
The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with local jurisdictions, the Missouri Department
of Transportation, and local public transportation operators.
Development of the 2020-2024 TIP has started. Included in the packet is a preliminary TIP highlighting
changes to be made in the final document. Items still requiring review or updating include:
• Adding new verbage on federal performance measures to include updated safety measures, travel
time reliability and freight reliability measures, and road and bridge measures.
• Updating financial totals for all Figures
• Updating MoDOT Operations and Maintenance costs.
• Updating list of fiscally constrained projects
• Fiscal numbers are incomplete.
• The map of projects has not been updated.
• The JEFFTRAN Program of Projects has not been updated.
• Planning Process Self Certification needs to be inserted.
CART Fund projections: 2020-2024 -based on an annual 2% inflationary factor on 2018 numbers
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Callaway 1,771,293.71$ 1,806,719.59$ 1,842,853.98$ 1,879,711.06$ 1,917,305.28$
Cole 1,246,466.98$ 1,271,396.32$ 1,296,824.25$ 1,322,760.73$ 1,349,215.95$
Holts Summit 136,341.57$ 139,068.40$ 141,849.77$ 144,686.76$ 147,580.50$
Jefferson City 1,808,888.80$ 1,845,066.57$ 1,881,967.90$ 1,919,607.26$ 1,957,999.41$
Lake Mykee 14,696.42$ 14,990.35$ 15,290.16$ 15,595.96$ 15,907.88$
St. Martins 47,868.59$ 48,825.96$ 49,802.48$ 50,798.53$ 51,814.50$
Taos 36,867.18$ 37,604.52$ 38,356.61$ 39,123.74$ 39,906.22$
Wardsville 63,236.94$ 64,501.68$ 65,791.71$ 67,107.54$ 68,449.69$ Note: Lake Mykee has incorporated into Holts Summit; those two will be totaled together
Staff asks that all members review the budget information (Figure 4), review existing projects in the TIP, and
ask for projects for inclusion into the new TIP.
If you have questions or require additional information, I can be reached at 573-634-6536 or by email at
arotenberry@jeffcitymo.org.
Agenda Item 7B
Transportation Improvement Program
Program Years 2020 - 2024
July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2024
Adopted XXXXX
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal
Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this
report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of
Transportation.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the
grounds of race, color, sex, age, disability or national origin, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259).
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone: (573) 634-6410 Fax: (573) 634-6457
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1
Public Participation ....................................................................................................................................... 2
Project Selection ........................................................................................................................................... 2
TIP Development ........................................................................................................................................... 3
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications .................................................................................... 3
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects ............................................................................................................. 3
Air Quality Designation ................................................................................................................................. 4
Environmental Justice ................................................................................................................................... 4
Federal Performance Measures .................................................................................................................... 4
Financial Plan ................................................................................................................................................ 6
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding ......................................................................... 6
Operations and Maintenance – MoDOT ................................................................................................. 10
Operations and Maintenance - Local Government ................................................................................ 10
Financial Constraint ................................................................................................................................ 12
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects ............................................................................................. 13
Figure 9 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects ................................................................. 18
Program of Projects - OATS ......................................................................................................................... 19
Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN ................................................................................................................. 20
Multimodal Projects .................................................................................................................................... 20
Appendix A – Amendments and Administrative Modifications.................................................................. 21
Appendix B – Federal Funding Sources ....................................................................................................... 22
Appendix C – Policies and Procedures ........................................................................................................ 23
Appendix D – Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification .............................................. 27
Appendix E – Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 28
i
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors
and Individuals with Disabilities
5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
CAMPO Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality Program
CO Carbon Monoxide (vehicle
emissions)
EPA Environmental Protection
Agency
FAST Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act
FHWA Federal Highway
Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FY Fiscal Year
HC Hydrocarbon (vehicle
emissions)
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement
Program
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in
the 21st Century
MoDOT Missouri Department of
Transportation
MPO Metropolitan Planning
Organization
MTP Metropolitan Transportation
Plan
NHFP National Highway Freight
Program
NHPP National Highway Performance
Program
NOx Nitrogen Oxides
ONE DOT Collaboration between FHWA
and FTA
PBPP Performance Based Planning
and Programming
POP Program of Projects
PM Particulate Matter
STIP State Transportation
Improvement Program
STBG Surface Transportation Block
Grant Program
TAP Transportation Alternatives
TCOS Taking Care of the System
TCOS (AC) Taking Care of the System
(Advanced Construction)
TERM Transit Economic Requirements
Model
TIP Transportation Improvement
Program
TPM Transportation Performance
Management
VMT Vehicle Miles of Travel
ii
(Resolution approving TIP goes here)
iii
(CAMPO Board, TC, and staff listing goes here)
1
Introduction
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) is the designated metropolitan planning
organization for the Jefferson City, Missouri planning area whose purpose is to carry out a continuing,
cooperative, and comprehensive long range transportation planning process. As part of this process, in
2017, CAMPO updated the 2013-2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) with the last program
year TIP, to address the current and future transportation needs for the Metropolitan Planning Area
(MPA). The MPA includes a southern portion of Callaway County, northeastern portion of Cole County,
cities of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, and Wardsville.
Figure 1 – The CAMPO Planning Area
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects
to be implemented within the MPA. The projects are funded by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed “regionally significant” ($500 million
or higher projects). Each project or project phase included in the TIP is consistent with investment
strategies discussed in the MTP and is part of the process of applying for funds from the FHWA and
FTA. Certain capital and non-capital transportation projects using funding under 23 U.S.C. and 49
2
U.S.C. Chapter 53 or regionally significant projects requiring action by the FHWA or the FTA are
required to be included in the TIP. The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with the
Missouri Department of Transportation and local public transportation operators.
Public Participation
CAMPO seeks active and meaningful involvement of the public and interested parties in the development
and update of transportation plans and programs, including the TIP. All meetings of the CAMPO
Technical Committee and Board of Directors are open to the public. All meeting agendas and minutes are
available on the City of Jefferson website or upon request. CAMPO provides all interested parties and the
public with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP as required by federal law.
Reasonable opportunity to comment and participate on the proposed TIP is made following the policies in
the CAMPO Public Participation Plan located on the CAMPO website at
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo. The approved TIP is available for review at several locations
throughout the CAMPO planning area as outlined in the Public Participation Plan.
The FTA allows a grantee, e.g. JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc., to rely on locally adopted public
participation plans for the submittal of their projects in lieu of a separate “Program of Projects” (POP) if
the grantee has coordinated with CAMPO and has ensured that the public is aware that the TIP and the
Public Participation Plan is being used to satisfy the POP public participation requirements. JEFFTRAN
is the public transit provider for the City of Jefferson and OATS, Inc. is a not-for-profit 501(c)3
corporation providing specialized transportation for senior citizens, people with disabilities and the rural
general public in 87 Missouri counties. Federal Transit Administration recipients of certain categories of
funds, JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. must follow a public participation plan. Both JEFFTRAN and OATS,
Inc. meet this coordination and public awareness criteria.
Project Selection
Transportation projects, funded by direct allocation of Federal funds to a project sponsor, award of
Federal funds via competitive grant, or wholly funded by the sponsor, are selected by the agency having
jurisdiction over the project using their own criteria and submitted to the CAMPO Board of Directors for
inclusion in the TIP. Transportation projects included within the TIP should be consistent with
investment strategies discussed in the MTP.
Transportation projects, funded by sub-allocated Federal funds directly to CAMPO or otherwise made
available for programming at the discretion of CAMPO, are selected based on competitive process
approved by the CAMPO Board of Directors. This process involves a call for projects and review by the
CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote of
approval.
3
TIP Development
The TIP is updated every year and covers a 5-year period starting July 1, 2019. TIP development begins
with a verification of status of projects in the current TIP, solicitation of new projects, and request for
budget information from local jurisdictions. Local transit providers are also requested to provide
information needed to develop their “Program of Projects” for inclusion in the TIP. CAMPO staff, with
support from the Technical Committee, member jurisdictions, MoDOT, FHWA, and FTA, develop the
financial plan, project listings, maintenance and operations, and other components of the TIP.
Once the draft TIP is developed, it is presented to the Technical Committee for review and
recommendation to the Board of Directors. A 25 day public comment period and public hearing are held
prior to the Board of Directors approval of the TIP. The Board then requests approval of the TIP by the
Governor and ONE DOT (consisting of FHWA and FTA). More information about public involvement
activities can be found in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan.
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Between TIP updates, if projects need to be added, removed or changed, the TIP can be changed either by
amendment or administrative modifications. Definitions of an amendment or an administrative
modification, and information about public participation, notifications, and other procedures regarding
amendments and administrative modifications, can be found in Appendix C – Policies and Procedures of
this document. Appendix A contains a listing of amendments and administrative modifications that have
occurred to this document.
Previous Projects
The TIP will include a listing of major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and identify
any significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. Major projects are defined as
transportation improvement projects receiving Federal financial assistance with an estimated total cost of
$500 million or more or that have been identified by the FHWA as being a major project.
No major projects were implemented, and no significant delays or projects from the previous TIP have
been identified.
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) requires that CAMPO publish an annual
listing of federally obligated projects. The Annual Listing of Projects is an index of projects which used
Federal funds that were obligated in the preceding TIP program year. Obligated projects are consistent
with the funding categories identified in the TIP.
4
An obligation is the Federal government’s legal commitment to pay the Federal share of a project’s cost.
An obligated project is one that has been authorized and funds have been obligated by a Federal agency.
Obligated projects are not necessarily initiated or completed in the program year, and the amount of the
obligation will not necessarily equal the total cost of the project. For Federal Transit Administration
projects, obligation occurs when the grant is awarded. For Federal Highway Administration projects,
obligation occurs when a project agreement is executed and the State/grantee requests that the funds be
obligated.
CAMPO publishes the Annual Listing of Obligated Projects yearly within 90 days of the previous TIP’s
program year. The Annual Listing of Obligated Projects is posted on the CAMPO website at
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo.
Air Quality Designation
The United States Environmental Protection Agency has designated the CAMPO Metropolitan Planning
Area as being in attainment for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Small
Particulate Matter (PM-2.5) Lead, and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2).
Environmental Justice
Executive Order 12898 requires agencies receiving federal funding to meaningfully address low-income
and minority populations in their plans, programs, policies, and activities. CAMPO staff expects project
sponsors to identify and mitigate any disproportionately high and adverse effects of federal transportation
programs.
Federal Performance Measures
This Section is to be updated to reflect two new and two updated performance measures: PM2 and
PM3 (Road and Bridge conditions and travel time reliability and freight reliability); TAM
measures as established in conjunction with JEFFTRAN; and the Safety Performance Measure
Targets (to be approved by the CAMPO Board of Directors February 2019). Staff is awaiting
further guidance from the DOT on language to be used in reporting these measures here in the TIP
and the MTP update.
In the passage of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), and continuing into
the FAST Act, Congress established Transportation Performance Management (TPM). FHWA defines
TPM as a strategic approach that uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to
achieve national performance goals.
Another new requirement is Performance Based Planning and Programming (PBPP) which impacts the
TIP and the MTP. PBPP refers to the application of performance management principles within the
5
planning and programming processes of transportation agencies to achieve desired performance outcomes
for the multimodal transportation system.
To comply with these new requirements, the CAMPO Board of Directors adopted targets for two
performance areas: the Transit Asset Management measures and Safety measures.
Transit Asset Management Measures
MoDOT collected and evaluated existing buses and facilities to be included in the State Transit Asset
Management Plan and used this information to set targets, which will be evaluated on an annual basis as
inventory changes. JEFFTRAN opted to create its own Transit Asset Management Plan and set its own
targets, which are identical to the state targets, as listed below.
Figure 2 – Transit Asset Management targets by MoDOT and JEFFTRAN
Assets
Performance Measure State Targets JEFFTRAN
Targets
Equipment
Non-revenue support-
service and maintenance
vehicles
Percentage of vehicles met or
exceeded Useful Life
Benchmark
50 percent 50 percent
Rolling Stock
Revenue vehicles by mode
Percentage of vehicles met or
exceeded Useful Life
Benchmark
50 percent 50 percent
Infrastructure (not
applicable in state plan)
Only rail fixed-guideway,
track, signals and systems
Percentage of track segments
with performance restrictions
by class
Not Applicable Not Applicable
Facilities
Percentage of assets with
condition rating below 3.0 on
FTA TERM* Scale
25 percent with
condition rating
below 3.0 on
FTA TERM
Scale
25 percent with
condition rating
below 3.0 on FTA
TERM Scale
* TERM is a Federal Transit Administration Transit Economic Requirements Model which helps transit agencies assess their
state of good repair backlog, level of annual investment to attain state of good repair, impact of variations in funding, and
investment priorities.
JEFFTRAN has its budget, fiscally constrained projects, and Program of Projects in this document. The
agency has identified $125,000 that may be utilized for bus replacement and other capital projects to help
JEFFTRAN move towards these targets.
Safety Measures
The Federal Highway Administration established 5 performance measures to assess performance and
carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program: (1) number of fatalities, (2) rate of fatalities per
vehicle mile traveled (VMT), (3) number of serious injuries, (4) rate of serious injuries per VMT, and (5)
number of combined non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries.
6
MoDOT established the following statewide safety targets in August 2017, as seen in Figure 3, which
shows the targets set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. These targets are updated annually.
Figure 3 – Safety Performance Measures set by MoDOT*
Performance Measure 5-year Rolling Average
(2012-2016)
5-Year Rolling
Average Statewide
Target for CY2018
Number of Fatalities 833.6 857.7
Fatality rate per 100 Million VMT 1.173 1.163
Number of Serious Injuries 4,877.2 4,559.3
Serious Injury Rate per 100 Million
VMT
6.884 6.191
Number of Non-Motorized
Fatalities and Serious Injuries
431.4 431.9
* Targets based on the State Highway Safety Plan: Missouri Blueprint -A Partnership Towards Zero Deaths, a 7% fatality
reduction, 4% serious injury reduction, 1% VMT increase and 4 % non-motorized reduction
There are a number of projects programmed for safety in the TIP, totaling $3,492,000 for Program Years
2019-2023, all sponsored by the Central District of MoDOT, to help the State move towards these targets.
CAMPO staff also actively participates in the Central District Coalition of Roadway Safety, which works
to implement Missouri’s Blueprint ultimate goal of zero fatalities on Missouri roadways, and participates
in the annual Highway Safety and Traffic Blueprint Conference.
Financial Plan
The TIP includes a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, and
indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to
carry out the TIP. CAMPO, MoDOT, and public transportation operators cooperatively develop
estimates of funds that are reasonably expected to be available to support TIP implementation. Only
projects for which construction or operating funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be
included. In developing the financial plan, CAMPO takes into account all projects and strategies funded
under Title 23 U.S.C., Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, and other federal funds, and regionally significant
projects that are not federally funded. For purposes of transportation operations and maintenance, the
financial plan shall contain system-level estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably
expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways (as defined by Title 23
U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation (as defined by Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53).
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding
Federal funding forecasts, provided by MoDOT based on published notices in the Federal Register,
estimate fiscal year authorization levels by the FHWA and FTA under the current highway act. Appendix
B briefly describes most of the Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO
planning area.
7
For Federally-funded projects, the TIP must identify the appropriate “matching funds” by source. The
matching funds are usually provided by state and local governments. State revenue forecasts are also
provided by MoDOT based on historical data of the State Fuel Tax, State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax and
General Revenue.
Local revenue forecast from the County Aid Road Trust (State Fuel Tax and State Vehicle Sales and Use
Tax) for each jurisdiction are based on past distributions and are assumed to continue a trend of a 2
percent inflation rate. The City of Jefferson has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement
Program and a ½ cent sales tax for Parks and Recreation, which supports greenways and other non-
motorized transportation activities. The City of Jefferson has provided its own future revenue projections
from these sources. Cole County has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a
real property tax levy of $0.27 earmarked for Road & Bridges. All small cities get $100,000 every five
years from Cole County, which comes from the aforementioned sales tax. Callaway County has a real
property tax levy of $0.2466 earmarked for Road & Bridges.
Outlined in Figure 4 are local forecasts of revenue sources for over the life of the TIP available for
transportation projects, operations and maintenance.
This table will be updated as financial data is researched. Staff is currently updating CART funds.
8
Figure 4 – Forecast Revenue for Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance.
In the past, local governments have used general revenue and other sources of revenue, as they deemed
appropriate to match transportation grants awarded. It is not uncommon, nor difficult, for local
jurisdictions to transfer funds from one account to another at their discretion.
Figure 5 shows the total programmed project funds and available project funds by source. The project
costs have inflation factored in by each project sponsor. The instructions on the form used to submit a
project for inclusion in the TIP reminds the project sponsor to take inflation into account when estimating
the project’s cost. Since the last iteration of the MTP, the inflation factor for the TIP has been set as 2
percent.
This table will be updated and finalized once all project sponsors have submitted all projects.
Callaway County 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)1,737,801$ 1,772,557$ 1,808,008$ 1,844,169$ 1,881,052$ 9,043,587$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.2466 levy)1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 9,500,000$
Transfer from general revenue 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,500,000$
Cole County
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)1,242,448$ 1,267,296$ 1,292,642$ 1,318,495$ 1,344,865$ 6,465,747$
Sales Tax 5,335,647$ 5,335,647$ 5,335,647$ 5,335,647$ 5,335,647$ 26,678,235$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.27 levy)3,958,237$ 3,958,237$ 3,958,237$ 3,958,237$ 3,958,237$ 19,791,185$
Motor Vehicle Sales Tax 352,209$ 352,209$ 352,209$ 352,209$ 352,209$ 1,761,045$
Holts Summit
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)**149,358$ 149,645$ 149,937$ 150,236$ 150,540$ 749,716$
Transportation Sales Tax 400,000$ 406,000$ 412,000$ 418,000$ 424,000$ 2,060,000$
Sales Tax 32,500$ 33,150$ 33,800$ 34,500$ 35,190$ 169,140$
Cap Imp Street Revenue 40,170$ 41,375$ 42,616$ 43,895$ 45,212$ 213,268$
Interest 8,800$ 9,200$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 48,000$
NID Deposits 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 40,000$
City of Jefferson
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)1,791,438$ 1,827,267$ 1,863,812$ 1,901,088$ 1,939,110$ 9,322,716$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Parks Sales Tax 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 24,759,390$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement (Expires March 2022)1,720,000$ 1,720,000$ 1,720,000$ 1,720,000$ 1,720,000$ 8,600,000$
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
Passenger Fares & Misc. 633,697$ 646,371$ 659,298$ 672,484$ 685,934$ 3,297,785$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement (Expires March 2022)80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 400,000$
St. Martins
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)47,407$ 48,355$ 49,322$ 50,308$ 51,315$ 246,707$
General Revenue Funds 210,700$ 214,914$ 219,212$ 223,597$ 228,068$ 1,096,491$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement*20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Taos
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)36,512$ 37,242$ 37,987$ 38,746$ 39,521$ 190,007$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement* 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Wardsville
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)62,627$ 63,879$ 65,157$ 66,460$ 67,789$ 325,913$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement* 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
OATS
Passenger Fares, Misc.6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 30,000$
Section 5310 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 30,000$
Medicaid Transportation 36,000$ 36,000$ 36,000$ 36,000$ 36,000$ 180,000$
126,798,931$
Note: County Aid Road Trust includes State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales/Use Tax and Licensing Fees.
Please see more on CART funds here: http://dor.mo.gov/publicreports/index.php#motorfuel
* This is distributed from Cole County
Available Local Transportation Funds
Total Local Funds
CART Funds based on 2017 numbers from MoDOT. There is a conservative two (2)
percent increase per year, based on historical numbers.
** Holts Summit now receives Lake Mykee's CART funds after they merged in 2017.
9
Figure 5 – Programmed and Available Funds by Source.
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
FHWA NHPP $947,200 $9,754,400 $4,168,800 $0 $0 $14,870,400 $947,200 $9,754,400 $4,168,800 $0 $0 $14,870,400
FHWA HSIP $33,300 $32,400 $1,031,400 $2,394,900 $0 $3,492,000 $33,300 $32,400 $1,031,400 $2,394,900 $0 $3,492,000
FHWA STBG $6,489,000 $0 $1,290,600 $1,260,000 $0 $9,039,600 $6,489,000 $0 $1,290,600 $1,260,000 $0 $9,039,600
FHWA TAP $278,564 $0 $0 $0 $0 $278,564 $278,564 $0 $0 $0 $0 $278,564
FHWA SHRP2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA RTP $71,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $71,000 $71,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $71,000
FTA 5307 $725,594 $729,222 $732,868 $736,532 $740,215 $3,664,431 $725,594 $729,222 $732,868 $736,532 $740,215 $3,664,431
FTA 5310 $60,000 $70,000 $170,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 $60,000 $70,000 $170,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000
FTA 5311 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5316 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5329 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5339 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT MPEN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT Safety $3,700 $3,600 $114,600 $266,100 $0 $388,000 $3,700 $3,600 $114,600 $266,100 $0 $388,000
MoDOT State Operating $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $57,075 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $57,075
MoDOT SWIMB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT TCOS $2,640,050 $6,310,600 $7,451,600 $426,000 $0 $16,828,250 $2,640,050 $6,310,600 $7,451,600 $426,000 $0 $16,828,250
MoDOT State Rail $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Jefferson City $1,183,552 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $5,359,196 $1,183,552 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $5,359,196
Cole County $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Oats $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $75,000 $75,000 $350,000 $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $75,000 $75,000 $350,000
Holts Summit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
St. Martins $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other $196,589 $198,505 $250,540 $202,494 $204,468 $1,052,596 $196,589 $198,505 $250,540 $202,494 $204,468 $1,052,596
$12,699,964 $18,224,053 $16,335,734 $6,491,352 $2,150,009 $12,699,964 $18,224,053 $16,335,734 $6,491,352 $2,150,009
$55,901,112 $55,901,112
Programmed Funds Available Funds
Federal
State
Local
Yearly Totals
Total Available FundsTotal Programmed Total
10
Operations and Maintenance – MoDOT
This data is updated and distributed by MODOT and will be updated once the STIP is published.
Maintenance costs include MoDOT’s salaries, materials and equipment needed to deliver the roadway
and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities like minor surface
treatments such as: sealing, small concrete repairs and pothole patching; mowing right of way; snow
removal; replacing signs; striping; repairing guardrail; and repairing traffic signals. Performing these
activities requires employees; vehicles and other machinery; and materials such as salt, asphalt and fuel.
Maintenance operations expenditures are expected to increase 1.5% annually.
This makes MoDOT’s cost, $4,810 per lane mile.
Calculations are $372,986,000 / 77,537 lane miles.
Assumptions:
Maintenance Operations $472,304,000 *
Fleet Investments $ 24,607,000 *
Total $496,911,000
Minus Maintenance Fringe Benefits $123,925,000
Total $372,986,000
Lane miles 77,537 **
*Source: FY 2018 Budget approved 6/7/2017
** Source: Official 2016 State System Mileage
Operations and Maintenance - Local Government
Local revenue sources for operations and maintenance include state fuel tax, state vehicles sales/use tax,
local sales taxes, franchise fees, license and permit fees, property taxes, and other revenue sources that
provide significant resources for local general fund and specific funding of transportation. Not all taxes
and fees go to transportation, so the local jurisdiction usually will identify a budget specifically for
transportation purposes, such as capital improvements, Road and Bridge funds, transit operating
subsidies, road and street budgets, or operations and maintenance budgets.
The operations and maintenance costs for local governments include salaries, fringe benefits, materials,
and equipment needed to deliver the street and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes
basic maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as sealing, small concrete repairs, pothole
patching, mowing, snow removal, replacing signs, striping, and repairing traffic signals. These activities
may be performed in-house or outsourced.
Local government operations and maintenance on federal aid roads calculated for the system wide
average of operations & maintenance per centerline mile is $12,433 and $6,136 per lane mile plus 3
percent per year out to FY 2021, as determined by consultation with engineering and technical staff of the
11
local jurisdictions. Figure 6 shows the various roadway types in CAMPO’s MPA and the governing body
that is responsible for maintenance.
Figure 6 - Federal Aid Road Mileage by Jurisdiction.
Source: CAMPO Functional Classification GIS Database.
In addition to the local government operations and maintenance previously discussed, JEFFTRAN
expenses also cover fleet repair/maintenance, repairing/replacing bus shelters, bus washing, bus
maintenance facilities, public restrooms, and fuel. Figures 7 and 8 show the estimated expenditures for
transit operations and maintenance for JEFFTRAN and OATs, respectively.
Awaiting budgetary numbers from JEFFTRAN
Figure 7 - JEFFTRAN Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Operations and Maintenance revenue and expenditures are based on the most recently available budgets
and apply the inflation factor of 3 percent for FTA and City of Jefferson funding sources.
Awaiting budgetary numbers from OATS
Figure 8 – OATS Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Urban
Other
Freeway
Express
way
Urban
Other
Principal
Arterial
Urban
Minor
Arterial
Urban
Collector
Rural
Other
Principal
Arterial
Rural
Minor
Arterial
Rural
Major
Collector
Total Percent of
Total
(Jurisdiction)
Callaway County 2.3 2.9 0.9 6.1 2.89%
Cole County 3.6 5.9 4.6 14.1 6.63%
Holts Summit 3.1 4.1 0.5 7.6 3.61%
City of Jefferson*4.3 37.4 23.6 65.3 30.83%
MoDOT 34.6 8.7 18.2 11.9 5.4 5.3 32.7 116.8 55.13%
St. Martins 1.5 0.5 1.9 0.91%
Taos 0.0 0.00%
Wardsville 0.0 0.00%
Total (Functional Class)34.6 13.0 66.1 48.8 5.4 6.3 37.8 211.9 100.00%
Percent (Functional Class)16.3%6.1%31.2%23.0%2.5%3.0%17.8%
*Includes Parks & Rec.
Funding Type FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
FTA Section 5307 740,928$ 740,928$ 740,928$ 740,928$ 740,928$
City of Jefferson-Local Operating Assistance 1,023,442$ 1,043,911$ 1,064,789$ 1,086,085$ 1,107,807$
MoDOT State Operating Assistance 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$
Passenger fares and Misc 633,697$ 646,371$ 659,298$ 672,484$ 685,934$
Capital Funds 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$
Total 2,534,567$ 2,567,710$ 2,601,515$ 2,635,997$ 2,671,169$
12
Financial Constraint
To exhibit financial constraint, a financial plan should address three questions:
1) What will the needs for transportation in the CAMPO planning area cost?
The needs are identified by project in the following section and costs are summarized by funding
source in Figure 4.
2) What revenues are available that can be applied to the needs?
Specific revenues available to meet the needs are identified in Figure 4 - Forecast Revenue for
Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance, by jurisdiction and source.
3) Are the revenues sufficient to cover the costs?
As shown in Figure 5 – Programmed and Available Funds by Source, programmed fund amounts
equal anticipated fund amounts. For many jurisdictions as shown in Figure 4, available funds
exceed the amounts of revenues required to fund programmed projects.
Funding Sources 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
FTA-Section 5310 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$
Fares 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$
Local Contracts 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$
13
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects (Projects will be updated)
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $25,600 $105,600 $131,200
MoDOT TCOS $6,400 $26,400 $32,800
TIP #2013-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3015 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $492,800 $492,800
MoDOT TCOS $123,200 $123,200
Local $0
Other $0
Total $32,000 $748,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $780,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $19,200 $70,400 $158,400 $248,000
MoDOT TCOS $4,800 $17,600 $39,600 $62,000
TIP #2018-01 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3261 Other $0
FHWA NHPP $0
MoDOT TCOS $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $943,200 $943,200
MoDOT TCOS $235,800 $235,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total $24,000 $88,000 $1,377,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,489,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $204,800 $205,600 $520,000 $930,400
MoDOT TCOS $51,200 $51,400 $130,000 $232,600
TIP #2019-01 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3337 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $3,648,800 $3,648,800
MoDOT TCOS $912,200 $912,200
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $256,000 $257,000 $5,211,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,724,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $200 $200 $800 $5,800 $7,000
TIP #2019-02 Local $0
MoDOT#5P2190 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$800 $800 $3,200 $23,200 $28,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $51,400 $51,400
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$205,600 $205,600
Total $0 $1,000 $1,000 $4,000 $286,000 $0 $0 $292,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $200 $11,400 $11,600
TIP #2018-14 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3311 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$800 $45,600 $46,400
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $144,000 $144,000
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$576,000 $576,000
Total $1,000 $777,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $778,000
Comments: Project involves bridges A3451,
A4265, and A4662. Award date 2020.
Total Project Cost: $778,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:US 50 Outer Road Improvements E
N
G
Description & Location: Resurfacing f rom Big
Horn Drive to West Truman Blvd., W. Truman Blvd. to
just west of Hobbs Rd., Bus. 50 W to Rainbow Dr. and
intersection of W. Truman to Country Clu b
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Pavement improvements. Award date 2018.
Anticipated federal reimbursement from STBG.
Roadway Projects
Project
Name:
Bridge Projects
Total Project Cost: $780,000
Description & Location: Bridge rehabilitation and
upgrade ADA and guardrail at Dix Road over
US 50 in Jefferson City.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Involves bridge number A1187.
Award date 2019.
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30MoDOT Funding
Project
Name:Dix Road Bridge Improvements E
N
G
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Total Project Cost: $1,489,000
Prior
Funding
Bridge Improvements over Route 54 E
N
G
Description & Location: Includes bridge
improvements on Route 94 over Little Tavern
Creek in Callaway County and West Main over
Route 54/63 in Cole County
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Project
Name:
Bridge Preventative Maintenance On
US 50 Over Osage River E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge preventative
maintenance over the Osage River, 0.3 mile
west of the Route 63 junction.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridge A5552.
Anticipated federal reimbursement from STBG.
Total Project Cost: $292,000
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Rehabilitation On US 54 Over
Missouri River E
N
G
Description & Location:Bridge rehabilitation for
both bridges over the Missouri River in
Jefferson City.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridges A4497 and
L0550.
Total Project Cost: $5,724,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Funding Prior
Funding
14
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $36,000 $57,600 $971,200 $1,064,800
MoDOT TCOS $9,000 $14,400 $242,800 $266,200
TIP #2017-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3121 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $4,934,400 $4,934,400
MoDOT TCOS $1,233,600 $1,233,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $45,000 $72,000 $7,382,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,499,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $80,100 $80,100
MoDOT TCOS $8,900 $8,900
TIP #2017-12 Local $0
MoDOT#0S3021F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA STBG $1,210,500 $1,210,500
MoDOT TCOS $134,500 $134,500
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,434,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,434,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $75,600 $75,600
MoDOT TCOS $8,400 $8,400
TIP #2018-05 Local $0
MoDOT#0S3022F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA STBG $1,184,400 $1,184,400
MoDOT TCOS $131,600 $131,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $1,400,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $4,000 $79,400 $85,400
TIP #2019-03 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3333 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$8,000 $16,000 $317,600 $341,600
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $1,173,000 $1,173,000
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$4,692,000 $4,692,000
Total $0 $10,000 $20,000 $6,262,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,292,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $16,000 $396,000 $412,000
MoDOT TCOS $4,000 $99,000 $103,000
TIP #2019-06 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3371 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $2,145,600 $2,145,600
MoDOT TCOS $536,400 $536,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $20,000 $3,177,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,197,000
Total Project Cost: $6,292,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:US 54 Pavement Improvements E
N
G
Comments: Length: Award Date 2019
R
O
W
MoDOT
Total Project Cost: $1,400,000
Total Project Cost: $1,434,000
C
O
N
S
T
Prior
Funding
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Comments: $1.268 million statewide transportation
alternatives funds. Award Date 2021.
Description & Location: ADA Transition Plan
improvements at various locations in the
Central District
C
O
N
S
T
Enhancement Projects in Central
District E
N
G
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Enhancement Projects in Central
District E
N
G
Description & Location: ADA Transition Plan
improvements at various locations in the
Central District
R
O
W
Total Project Cost: $7,499,000
Funding
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement Improvements on US 50 E
N
G
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Description & Location: Pavement improvements and
guard cables installation on the eastbound and
westbound lanes of US 54 from Route E to near
Stadium Boulevard in Jefferson City.
R
O
W
Funding
Project
Name:
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:$1.2 million statewide transportation
alternatives funds. Award Date 2022.
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
Description & Location: Pavement
improvements east of West Truman Blvd. to
east of Kaylor Bridge Road, all lanes and from
east of Route M to east of Stoney Gap Road
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal reimbursement
from STBG.
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Guard Cables Along US 54 E
N
G
Description & Location: Guard cable
improvements from Miller County to near
Stadium Blvd. in Jefferson City
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Award date Fall 2019
Total Project Cost: $3,197,000
15
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $45,000 $900 $45,900
MoDOT Safety $5,000 $100 $5,100
TIP #2013-16 Local $0
MoDOT#5S2234 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $50,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $144,000 $144,000
MoDOT Safety $16,000 $16,000
TIP #2018-04 Local $0
MoDOT#0P3022F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $2,250,900 $2,250,900
MoDOT Safety $250,100 $250,100
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,661,000 $0 $0 $2,661,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $400 $7,600 $8,000
TIP #2018-06 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3274 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$1,600 $30,400 $32,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $102,000 $102,000
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$408,000 $408,000
Total $2,000 $548,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $52,000 $200 $200 $200 $200 $52,800
MoDOT TCOS $13,000 $50 $50 $50 $50 $13,200
TIP #2015-07 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3081 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $65,000 $250 $250 $250 $250 $0 $0 $66,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2018-07 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3224 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $31,500 $31,500
MoDOT Safety $3,500 $3,500
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000
Project
Name:Safety Projects in Central District E
N
G
Description & Location: Safety projects at
various locations in the Central District.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: $2.289 million from Open Container
funds. Award Date 2022. 90/10 Grant/match.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
Total Project Cost: $36,000
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Other Projects
Description & Location: Scoping for slide
repairs in the northern portion of the Cental
District at various locations.
MoDOT Funding
Total Project Cost: $66,000
Slide Repair Scoping
Prior
Funding
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Award Date Spring 2019.
Anticipated federal reimbursement from STBG.
Total Project Cost: $550,000
Description & Location: Job order contracting
for guard cables and guardrail repair on
various routes in the northern portion of the
Central District.
R
O
W
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated Federal Funding Category -
STBG. Future construction cost $2 million - 5 million.
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30Prior
Funding
Funding
Funding Prior
FundingMoDOT
R
O
W
E
N
G
Project
Name:
MoDOT
Project
Name:On-call Work Zone Enforcement E
N
G
Project
Name:
Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in
Northern Central District E
N
G
Description & Location: Scoping for safety
improvements at the intersection of Route M
and Route W in Wardsville.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal funding
category: Safety.
Prior
Funding
FundingMoDOT State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Scoping Routes M, B & W E
N
G
Funding Prior
FundingMoDOT
Total Project Cost: $51,000
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Total Project Cost: $2,661,000
16
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $75,000 $30,000 $105,000
TIP #2018-08 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3179 MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total $75,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $8,000 $11,400 $125,000 $144,400
TIP #2018-02 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3230 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$32,000 $45,600 $500,000 $577,600
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $2,000
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$8,000 $8,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $645,000 $645,000
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$2,580,000 $2,580,000
Total $40,000 $67,000 $3,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,957,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $32,000 $1,040,800 $1,072,800
MoDOT TCOS $8,000 $260,200 $268,200
TIP #2018-03 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3259 MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA STBG $4,826,400 $4,826,400
MoDOT TCOS $1,206,600 $1,206,600
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total $40,000 $7,334,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,374,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $5,000 $5,000 $10,000
TIP #2018-09 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3254 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$20,000 $20,000 $40,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2019-04 Local $0
MoDOT#0X3121F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $1,031,400 $1,031,400
MoDOT Safety $114,600 $114,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,146,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,146,000
Total Project Cost: $105,000
Comments: No federal funds used for this
project.
Comments: 90/10 Grant/match.
Funding
MoDOT
Total Project Cost: $1,146,000
Prior
Funding
Description & Location: Curve safety
improvements at various locations in the
Central District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
E
N
G
MoDOT
Total Project Cost: $50,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:
Scoping for ADA Improvements in
Various Locations E
N
G
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated Federal Category - STBG.
Includes sidewalks, curb ramps, entrances, and signals
Total Project Cost: $7,374,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:Pavement resurfacing of Route C E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement resurfacing
from Route 52 near Versailles to Jefferson
City. Including Jefferson Street and Christy
Drive.
C
O
N
S
T
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Surveying E
N
G
Comments: Potential ADA improvements in
Taos. Award date 2020. Anticipated Federal
Funds: STBG.
Description & Location: Surveying to sell
excess right of way parcels in the Central
District.
R
O
W
R
O
W
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Curve Safety ImprovementsProject
Name:
Description & Location:Scoping for ADA
improvements at various locations in Chamois,
Frankenstein, Route M in Taos, and Route W in
Wardsville.
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30FundingPrior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Comments: Project involves bridge A2914.
Award date Fall 2018.
Total Project Cost: $3,957,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement improvements on Route M E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement
improvements from Rte. B to Rte. 50. Includes
Rte. E from Rte. 54 to Rte. B. Project also
includes Rte. W, Rte. Y and Rte. J.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
17
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2019-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3313 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $31,500 $31,500
MoDOT Safety $3,500 $3,500
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $20,000 $200 $20,200
TIP #2019-07 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3374 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$80,000 $800 $80,800
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $100,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $101,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA RTP $8,000 $8,000
MoDOT $0
TIP #2017-24 Local $0
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA RTP $71,000 $71,000 $142,000
MoDOT $0
Local Parks Tax $70,000 $70,000 $140,000
Other Private Don.$19,000 $19,000
Total $168,000 $141,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $309,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA TAP $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2017-27 Local Sales Tax $0
MoDOT#MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
MoDOT $0
FHWA TAP $278,564 $278,564
MoDOT $0
Local Sales Tax $69,641 $69,641
MoDOT $0
Total $0 $348,205 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $348,205
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
Other Pass. Fares $189,692 $191,589 $193,505 $195,440 $197,394 $199,368 $1,166,988
MoDOT State Operating $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $68,490
TIP #2011-04 Local $1,115,612 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $6,335,167
MoDOT#FTA 5307 $721,984 $725,594 $729,222 $732,868 $736,532 $740,215 $4,386,415
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $2,038,703 $1,972,509 $1,978,053 $1,983,634 $1,989,252 $1,994,909 $0 $11,957,060
Total Project Cost: $36,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
MoDOT Funding
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
Project
Name:Community Park Greenway Trailhead
R
O
W
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30Funding
Public Transportation Projects
Funding Prior
Funding
Project
Name:On-call Work Zone Enforcement E
N
G
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
C
O
N
S
T
E
N
G
Comments: The Jefferson City Cultural Arts
Foundation, Central Bank and Ameren Missouri have
pledged donations to help fund the project .
Project
Name:Operating Assistance
Description & Location: Operating Assistance
for JEFFTRAN service w ithin city limits of
Jefferson City (A 3% annual inflation factor
applied.)
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
City of Jefferson Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Missouri Boulevard Sidewalk, Beck to
Waverly E
N
G
Description & Location: Construct a 5’ wide
sidewalk along the northern side of Missouri
Boulevard from Beck Street to Waverly Street.
Includes Bicycle/Pedestrian/Transit facilities.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: TAP Grant awardee.
Total Project Cost: $348,205
Total Project Cost: $11,957,060
City of Jefferson
Description & Location: Development of a
greenway trailhead at Community Park – a restroom,
spray ground, misting station, water fountain, bike rack,
additional parking, benches, landscaping, and lighting.
Paid for by Local Parks Sales Tax.
O
P
E
R
Pedestrian & Bicycle Projects
Total Project Cost: $309,000
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Prior
Funding
Total Project Cost: $101,000
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Traffic Safety Studies E
N
G
Description & Location: Scoping to identify
potential improvements to safety and traffic
flow at various locations in the Central District
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated Federal Category -
STBG.
18
Figure 9 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
This map will be updated once projects are finalized.
19
Program of Projects - OATS
Awaiting projects from OATS
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA 5310 $94,053 $100,000 $194,053
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-10 Local $0
MoDOT#Other $23,513 $50,000 $73,513
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $117,566 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $267,566
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FTA 5310 $25,000 $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $75,000 $75,000 $375,000
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-11 Local $25,000 $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $75,000 $75,000 $375,000
MoDOT#Other $4,900 $5,000 $5,000 $5,100 $5,100 $5,100 $30,200
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $54,900 $125,000 $145,000 $145,100 $155,100 $155,100 $0 $780,200
Description & Location: Requested two (2)
vehicles to provide service in Jefferson City
and surrounding area
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Total Project Cost: $267,566
OATS
Project
Name:Capital Funding - Vehicles C
A
P
I
T
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Total Project Cost: $780,200
OATS Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Operating Assistance O
P
E
R
Description & Location: Within the Jefferson
City MPO Region-Section 5310 Program for
Elderly and Handicapped
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
20
Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN
Awaiting update from JEFFTAN
Multimodal Projects
In 2015, CAMPO met with federal and state planning partners in a formal planning process review.
Within two recommendations made, CAMPO was urged to include more multi-modal projects into the
TIP. CAMPO staff sent out written requests and reminders at CAMPO meetings for projects, including
those not using federal dollars. As of the writing of this document, no projects have been submitted.
However, there are a number of factors why these projects are limited. These types of projects are usually
incorporated into new road projects. Many of these types of projects are highly dependent on grants,
which may or may not be annually awarded. Projects are usually decided each budget year. There are
several bicycle or pedestrian projects in the MTP illustrative list, but projects are not constrained and
funds are not obligated.
Item Description Total
Funding by
Others Local
1 Replacement of paratransit widebody cutaway buses 150,000$ $ 120,000 30,000$
2 Update phone system 10,000$ -$ 10,000$
3 Replace paratransit software package 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
4 Rehab pavement 800 block E. Miller St.100,000$ -$ 100,000$
5 Replace low-floor minivan support vehicle 40,000$ -$ 40,000$
6 Replace transit administration vehicle 30,000$ 30,000$
7 Upgrade/replace electronic fare card system 300,000$ 240,000$ 60,000$
8 Repair Transfer Facility Roof (Bus Transfer Shelter)12,000$ -$ 12,000$
9 Transit facility improvements--ridge cap/flashing replacements/roof repair on bus barn 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
10 Security camera upgrades for transit facilities 20,000$ 16,000$ 4,000$
11 Replace outdated bus security camera systems 60,000$ 48,000$ 12,000$
12 Design work for New Transit Passenger Transfer and Admin Facility 150,000$ -$ 150,000$
13 Purchase and install bus shelters at various locations in Jefferson City 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
14 Transit facility improvements--replace overhead doors and door operators for Bus Barn 95,000$ 76,000$ 19,000$
15 JEFFTRAN lighted signs for exterior of transit facilities 15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
16 Purchase emergency back-up generator & switches for transit and CM facilities 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
17 Replace current low-floor route buses with 30 ft. low floor buses for 2020 delivery (2)1,200,000$ 960,000$ 240,000$
18 Replace current low-floor route buses with 30 ft. low floor buses for 2021 delivery (3)1,800,000$ 1,440,000$ 360,000$
19 Construct new passenger transfer and administrative facility 7,000,000$ 5,600,000$ 1,400,000$
20 Transit admin facility rehab 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
21 Transit Traveler Kiosks (each)15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
22 Bike racks at passenger transfer facilities and selected bus stops 5,000$ -$ 5,000$
23 Security gates for transit storage, maintenance and fueling facilities 20,000$ 16,000$ 4,000$
24 Charging systems/electrical upgrades for buses 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
25 Add crosswalks to various locations around the city 60,000$ -$ 60,000$
JEFFTRAN Program of Projects
Illustrative Projects
21
Appendix A – Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Amendments
TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Board
Approval
OneDOT
Approval
Administrative Modifications
TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Date
22
Appendix B – Federal Funding Sources
Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO planning area.
FHWA Program Eligible Activities
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/nhppfs.pd
f
The NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of
the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new
facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid
funds in highway construction are directed to support progress
toward the achievement of performance targets established in a
State's asset management plan for the NHS.
Surface Transportation Program (STP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/stbgfs.pdf
The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding
that may be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and
improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid
highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian
and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including
intercity bus terminals.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is to support a
significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all
public roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on
tribal lands
Transportation Alternatives (TA)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/transporta
tionalternativesfs.pdf
The FAST Act eliminates the MAP-21 Transportation Alternatives
Program (TAP) and replaces it with a set-aside of Surface
Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program funding for
transportation alternatives (TA). These set-aside funds include all
projects and activities that were previously eligible under TAP.
Railway-Highway Crossings (set-aside from HSIP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/railwayh
wycrossingsfst.pdf
This program funds safety improvements to reduce the number of
fatalities, injuries, and crashes at public grade crossings.
FTA Programs Eligible Activities
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/urbanized-
area-formula-grants-5307
This program provides grants to Urbanized Areas (UZA) for public
transportation capital, planning, job access and reverse commute
projects, as well as operating expenses in certain circumstances.
Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and
Individuals with Disabilities
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/enhanced-
mobility-seniors-individuals-disabilities-section-5310
This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons
with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special
needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public
transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
complementary paratransit services.
Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas
https://www.transit.dot.gov/rural-formula-grants-5311
This program provides capital, planning, and operating assistance to
states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations
less than 50,000, where many residents often rely on public transit to
reach their destinations.
Section 5329 Transit Safety & Oversight
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs
/5329_Safety_Program_Fact_Sheet.pdf
This section requires FTA to implement and maintain a national
public transportation safety program to improve the safety of all
public transportation systems that receive federal funding. The safety
program includes a national public transportation safety plan, a
safety certification training program, a public transportation agency
safety plan, and a state safety oversight program.
Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/busprogra
m
Provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses
and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities.
23
Appendix C – Policies and Procedures
Amendments
An amendment involves a major change to a project and requires approval by the Board of Directors and
Governor. An amendment is a revision that requires public review, allowance of comment, possible re-
demonstration of fiscal constraint, and includes at least one of the following:
• Addition or deletion of a project using FHWA or FTA funds (except as allowed as an administrative
modification),
• Major changes affecting project cost from FHWA or FTA sources (changes exceeding 20% of
FHWA or FTA sources of the existing project cost or changes over $2,000,000),
• Major changes in a project phase initiation date (greater than 12 months), or
• Major changes in design concept or design scope, such as changing project termini (more than 1/2
mile or 10% of the total length of the project, whichever is greater) or changing the number of
through traffic lanes that also includes a substantial increase in Federal cost.
Amendments will be initiated by the project sponsor. Amendments to delete a project can simply be
made via written correspondence identifying the project and why it is to be removed from the TIP.
Amendments to include a new project can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a
cover letter or remark in the comment section requesting inclusion in the TIP as an amendment.
Amendments for existing projects can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover
letter or remark in the comment section highlighting the change in the project and providing the CAMPO
TIP Number.
After an Amendment has been requested the process as follows:
• Staff will review the amendment for accuracy and to verify if an amendment is required or if the
change qualifies as an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if
necessary.
• The amendment will be placed on the next Technical Committee (TC) meeting agenda for review.
• The Technical Committee is an advisory board to the board of directors. Regardless of whether the
Technical Committee recommends approval of a project, does not recommend approval of a project,
or is unable to make a recommendation, the project shall still proceed to the Board of Directors to
make a final decision.
• If approval is recommended by the TC to the Board of Directors, staff will post the amendment notice
on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar day public comment period, send notices to the
appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next Board of Directors meeting agenda.
• At the Board of Directors Meeting, a public hearing will close the public comment period and a vote
for approval will be held.
If the project sponsor indicates an emergency situation upon submitting the amendment, staff will initiate
the public comment period, staff will post the amendment notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7
calendar day public comment period, send notices to the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on
the next Board of Directors meeting agenda. A public hearing will close the public comment period at the
next Board of Directors Meeting and hold a vote for approval. If this is not adequate to meet the
24
emergency situation, a special Board of Directors meeting may be called and proceed as outlined in the
Public Participation Plan.
Administrative Modifications
Revisions to the TIP and TIP projects that do not meet the criteria of an Amendment will be considered
administrative modifications including: minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to
funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation
dates. An administrative modification is a revision that neither requires committee action, public review
and comment, nor redemonstrates fiscal constraint.
An administrative modification will be initiated by the project sponsor by written communication to
CAMPO staff describing the change (phase cost, funding sources, or phase initiation date) warranting the
modification. Staff will review the administrative modification for accuracy and to verify qualification as
an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if necessary.
Upon CAMPO staff confirmation of the administrative modification requirements being met, staff will
modify the TIP appropriately, including noting the administrative modification in Appendix A of the TIP
and making changes to the project listing in the body of the TIP; notify the Board of Directors, Technical
Committee, MoDOT, FTA, and FHWA via email; draft a staff report for the next Board of Directors and
Technical Committee meeting; and post the modified TIP notice on the CAMPO website for a minimum
of 7 calendar days.
Combining or Splitting Projects
Splitting a project into two or more projects or combining two or more projects can provide benefits to
project scheduling, cost, and logistics. A split or combination can be made via an administrative
modification to the TIP, if the project does not trigger a major change to the project as described in the
amendment section and the overall scope of work does not change.
When combining two or more projects, the financial and description information will be rolled up into the
project which was in the TIP originally and use the previous MPO TIP number. When splitting a project
into two or more projects, the financial and descriptive information will be separated appropriately into
several (two or more) projects using the same MPO TIP number, but the additional projects will include
alphabetic suffixes. The process for splitting or combining projects will follow the procedures of either
an amendment or administrative modification.
Compliance with Metropolitan Transportation Plan
For a project to be eligible for the TIP, it first must be included in the adopted MTP. Large capital
projects, roadway capacity, and/or general purpose roadway projects must be individually listed or clearly
part of a larger project included in the fiscally‐constrained component of the plan. Certain projects
seeking to improve safety, increase multi‐modal opportunities, or enhance the existing transportation
system may be programmed in the TIP without individual identification in the regional plan, so long as
they are consistent with the established goals and objectives of the plan.
25
Project Delay Policy
The goal of the Project Delay Policy for the Transportation Improvement Program is to maximize the
federal funding obligated each fiscal year and to enable the MPO to redirect funds to different projects if
any are inactive or otherwise limited from making progress. The Delay Policy applies to projects funded
through the programs for which CAMPO has oversight of project selection.
The intent of the Delay Policy is to provide an incentive for local agency sponsors to develop their
projects according to a detailed schedule and, thereby, to obligate the federal funds assigned to each
project within the timeframes initially shown in the TIP. The Delay Policy is primarily focused on
projects that involve construction or provide transportation improvements that are handled through
purchasing procedures.
In the context of this Delay Policy, a “delay” occurs when a construction-related project phase does not
get advertised within six months of the TIP program year in which its construction phase funding was
originally programmed, or changed with an amendment, in the TIP. For non-construction projects and
programs, a “delay” occurs when the “Notice to Proceed” is not issued within two months of the TIP
program year in which its implementation was originally funded in the TIP. The consequence of a delay
may be the withdrawal of its Federal funds from the TIP or other action by the Board.
Project Funding Information
When a new project is submitted for inclusion to the TIP, either during the initial development of the TIP
or as an amendment, the project sponsor is required to provide information regarding the local funding
sources in order to show fiscal constraint. The specific source of revenue, anticipated future, and any
other financial information needed to show fiscal constraint will be required.
Project Selection
The CAMPO Board of Directors adopted (Resolution 2010-04) a project prioritization and selection
process. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff and
reviewed by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of
Directors for a vote of approval. The Board of Directors may modify the project selection it deems
necessary.
Project Sponsor Commitment to Projects
Project sponsors hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring that project information contained in the TIP is
correct, that it accurately represents the scope of work being performed, and that the amount of funding
being requested is correct. The sponsor is responsible for providing CAMPO with an honest accounting
of project details including: costs, implementation schedules, and local matching fund sources, at the time
of the application for federal funds and anytime such details change. The project sponsor is also
responsible for reviewing the TIP after a project is included or modified to ensure correctness.
Scriveners’ Error
Errors made the in the ministerial functions of creating and maintaining the TIP, such as cartography,
typographical, spelling, minor word omissions, mathematical, and other error’s which do not alter the
26
intent of the TIP and have little or no impact can be performed by staff and shall not be considered a
revision to the TIP.
27
Appendix D – Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification
28
Appendix E – Definitions
Attainment area means any geographic area in which levels of a given criteria air
pollutant (e.g., ozone, carbon monoxide, PM10, PM2.5, and nitrogen dioxide) meet
the health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for that
pollutant. An area may be an attainment area for one pollutant and a nonattainment
area for others. A maintenance area (see definition below) is not considered an
attainment area for transportation planning purposes.
Available funds means funds derived from an existing source dedicated to or
historically used for transportation purposes. For Federal funds, authorized and/or
appropriated funds and the extrapolation of formula and discretionary funds at
historic rates of increase are considered available. A similar approach may be used
for State and local funds that are dedicated to or historically used for transportation
purposes.
Conformity means a Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) requirement that ensures that
Federal funding and approval are given to transportation plans, programs and
projects that are consistent with the air quality goals established by a State
Implementation Plan (SIP). Conformity, to the purpose of the SIP, means that
transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations, worsen existing
violations, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. The transportation
conformity rule (40 CFR part 93) sets forth policy, criteria, and procedures for
demonstrating and assuring conformity of transportation activities.
Cooperation means that the parties involved in carrying out the transportation
planning and programming processes work together to achieve a common goal or
objective.
Coordination means the cooperative development of plans, programs, and schedules
among agencies and entities with legal standing and adjustment of such plans,
programs, and schedules to achieve general consistency, as appropriate.
Design concept means the type of facility identified for a transportation improvement
project (e.g., freeway, expressway, arterial highway, grade separated highway, toll
road, reserved right-of-way rail transit, mixed-traffic rail transit, or busway).
Design scope means the aspects that will affect the proposed facility’s impact on the
region, usually as they relate to vehicle or person carrying capacity and control
(e.g., number of lanes or tracks to be constructed or added, length of project,
signalization, safety features, access control including approximate number and
location of interchanges, or preferential treatment for high occupancy vehicles).
Financial Plan means documentation required to be included with a metropolitan
transportation plan and TIP (and optional for the long-range statewide
transportation plan and STIP) that demonstrates the consistency between
reasonably available and projected sources of Federal, State, local, and private
revenues and the costs of implementing proposed transportation system
improvements.
Financially Constrained or Fiscal Constraint means that the metropolitan
transportation plan, TIP, and STIP includes sufficient financial information for
demonstrating that projects in the metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, and STIP
can be implemented using committed, available, or reasonably available revenue
sources, with reasonable assurance that the federally supported transportation
system is being adequately operated and maintained. For the TIP and the STIP,
financial constraint/fiscal constraint applies to each program year. Additionally,
projects in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas can be included in the
first two years of the TIP and STIP only if funds are available or committed.
Illustrative Project means an additional transportation project that may (but is not
required to) be included in a financial plan for a metropolitan transportation plan,
TIP, or STIP if reasonable additional resources were to become available.
Maintenance Area means any geographic region of the United States that the EPA
previously designated as a nonattainment area for one or more pollutants pursuant
to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and subsequently redesignated as an
attainment area subject to the requirement to develop a maintenance plan under
section 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
Major Projects - These transportation improvements are defined as projects receiving
Federal financial assistance 1) with an estimated total cost of $500 million or more
or 2) that have been identified by the FHWA as being a Major Project. The
designated projects may include those: 1) that require a substantial amount of a
State Transportation Agency's program resources, 2) that have a high level of
public or congressional attention, or 3) that have extraordinary implications for the
national transportation system.
Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) means the geographic area determined by
agreement between the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the area and
the Governor, in which the metropolitan transportation planning process is carried
out.
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) means the official multimodal
transportation plan addressing no less than a 20-year planning horizon that is
developed, adopted, and updated by CAMPO through the metropolitan
transportation planning process.
Nonattainment area means any geographic region of the United States that has been
designated by the EPA as a nonattainment area under section 107 of the Clean Air
Act for any pollutants for which an NAAQS exists.
Obligated projects means strategies and projects funded under title 23 U.S.C. and
title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for which the supporting Federal funds were authorized
and committed by the State or designated recipient in the preceding program year,
and authorized by the FHWA or awarded as a grant by the FTA.
Program of Projects (POP) is a list of projects to be funded in a grant application
submitted to FTA by a designated recipient. The POP lists the subrecipients and
indicates whether they are private non-profit agencies, governmental authorities, or
private providers of transportation service, designates the areas served (including
rural areas), and identifies any tribal entities. In addition, the POP includes a brief
description of the projects, total project cost, and Federal share for each project.
Project selection means the procedures followed by MPOs, States, and public
transportation operators to advance projects from the first four years of an approved
TIP and/or STIP to implementation, in accordance with agreed upon procedures.
Project sponsor must be a city, county, state, or other transportation related
government agency eligible to receive federal funding from the Federal Highway
or Federal Transit Administrations. All other entities must partner with a city,
county, or state agency to apply for and/or administer a transportation project.
Public transportation operator means the public entity which participates in the
continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in
accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135 and 49 U.S.C. 5303 and 5304, and is the
designated recipient of Federal funds under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for
transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and continuing general or
special transportation to the public, but does not include school bus, charter, or
intercity bus transportation or intercity passenger rail transportation provided by
Amtrak.
Regionally significant project means a transportation project (other than projects that
may be grouped in the TIP and/or STIP or exempt projects as defined in EPA’s
transportation conformity regulation (40 CFR part 93)) that is on a facility which
serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area outside
the region; major activity centers in the region; major planned developments such
as new retail malls, sports complexes, or employment centers; or transportation
terminals) and would normally be included in the modeling of the metropolitan
area’s transportation network. At a minimum, this includes all principal arterial
highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer a significant alternative
to regional highway travel.
Statewide transportation improvement program (STIP) means a statewide
prioritized listing/program of transportation projects covering a period of four years
that is consistent with the long-range statewide transportation plan, metropolitan
transportation plans, and TIPs, and required for projects to be eligible for funding
under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a document prepared by a
metropolitan planning organization that lists projects to be funded with
FHWA/FTA funds for the at least next one- to three-year period.
Unified Planning Work Plan (UPWP) is the management plan for the (metropolitan)
planning program. Its purpose is to coordinate the planning activities of all
participants in the planning process.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
FY2020 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
February 7, 2019
Summary
Staff has begun work on the FY2020 UPWP. This annual process starts very early due to the City of
Jefferson’s budget process. The FY2020 UPWP is anticipated to be adopted by May 2019.
The UPWP is CAMPO’s annual statement of work identifying the budget, planning priorities, and
activities to be carried out for the year (November 1to October 31). The UPWP contains many ongoing
activities required to perform the essential functions of CAMPO, as well as, periodic and one-time
activities. The UPWP serves as the basis for funding agreements with the Missouri Department of
Transportation (MoDOT).
The draft budget for FY2020 is approximately $180,153 with $144,122 (80%) funded through the
Consolidated Planning Grant and $36,031 (20%) funded through local match. The 20% local match is
provided by Jefferson City (75%) and Cole County (25%). Based on the anticapated FY2020
expenditure, it is projected that CAMPO will have a balance of $412,960 in unprgrammed CPG funds.
Staff is in the process of developing objectives and activities for FY2020. Input from the Technical
Committee, Board of Directors, stakeholders, and the general public will be used throughout the process.
These activities are categorized into five work elements:
• Work Element 1 - Program Support & Administration
• Work Element 2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination
• Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning
• Work Element 4 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming
• Work Element 5 - Public Transportation Planning
Major activities in FY2020, developed thus far, include:
• Update of the Title VI Plan Tri-Annual
• Update of the Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan Tri-Annual
• Update of the Public Participation Plan (PPP) Tri-Annual
• Development of the FY2021 UPWP Annual
• Development of the 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program Annual
Staff will continue to develop other activities through May of 2019 and any input is welcome.
If you have questions or require additional information, I can be reached at 573-634-6536 or by email at
kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org.
Agenda Item 7C
CPG Balance for end of FY2018 $385,907
FY 2019 CPG Expenditure - Estimated*($140,942)
Subtotal $244,965
FY 2019 CPG Allocation - Estimated $154,723
FY 2020 CPG Allocation - Estimated per MoDOT FY2020 SPR Work Program $157,394 Not verified in SPR for FY2020
FY 2020 CPG Programmed Expenditure ($144,122)
Remaining Unprogrammed CPG Funds $412,960
Consolidated Planning Grant Balance
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Status of Current Work Tasks
February 7, 2019
Summary
The following list includes work tasks that are currently in progress or have been completed since the previous
Technical Committee meeting:
• Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - See attached memo.
• Federal Performance Measures - Staff continues collaborating with MODOT staff
concerning various federal performance measures required by MAP-21 and the FAST Act.
• Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - The process to update the TIP has started.
Expect inquiries from staff on projects, updates and new projects, and budgetary information.
See attached memo.
• Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) – Staff has begun the process to develop the FY
2020 Unified Planning Work Program. See attached memo.
• Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) Grant Update- All five of the planning
partners met on December 19, 2018. Eight communities in Central District were awarded
TAP Grants, with federal funds totaling $1,870,693. From the CAMPO Region, St. Martins
was chosen for the TAP award. The award was based on the other four planning partners
ranking this project as the highest priority in Central District.
• JEFFTRAN Route Guides – Staff continues to work with JEFFTRAN staff in finalizing a
new route guide. The route guides are anticipated to be distributed in March 2019.
Agenda Item 8A