Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
19860122 - Agenda Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 86-03
� Meeting 03��_ ' Ar � dh Of MIDPENINSULA � REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT maomrELCIRCLE,SUITE Dw.uS ALTOS,CALIFORNIA o40u | � (415)965-4717 REGULAR MEETING Wednesday BOARD OF DIRECTORS 375 Di5tel Circle, D-1 | January 22, 1986 LDS Altos, California | | A � E � � /7�3O\ ROLL CALL � ` , � � APPROVAL OF MINUTES (January 8, 1986\ SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY /7 ^35\ l . Resolution Of Commendation for Lennie Roberts -- H. Turner ` Resolution Commending Lennie Roberts for Her Service to the MidpeMiMsU{d in the Preservation of "Open Space for Room to Breathe" � WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS | ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ADOPTION OF AGENDA � BOARD BUSINESS � /7:45\ l . Presentation on Total Access Camping -- D. Hansen /8:05\ 2. Clarification Of Assignment to Land Acquisition Policy Committee -- H. GrenCh � /8:15\ 3' Information Regarding the Feasibility of Sheriff's Patrol Assistance in the � Mt. Umunhum Area at the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve -- D. Hansen /8z36\ 4. Annual Review Of Relative Site Emphasis Plan and Use and Management Plan Review Schedule -- D. Hansen (8:59) 5. Final Adoption of the Revised Use and Management Plan for the Sierra Arul Open Space Preserve - Limekiln Canyon and Kennedy Road Areas -- D. Hansen /9:00\ 6' Final Adoption Of Interim Use and Management Plan for the Atwood Property Addition to El SerenV Open Space Preserve -- D. Hansen � � /9:05\ 7. Land and Water Conservation Fund Application for Addition to Coal Creek Open Space � Preserve -- D. Hansen � | � Resolution Approving the Application for Land and Water Conservation Funds for the Coal Creek Open Space Preserve Addition Project | � /9:15\ G. Land and Water Conservation Fund Application for Skyline Ridge Public Access � Project -- D. Hansen � | Resolution Approving the Application for Land and Water Conservation Funds for the � Skyline Ridge Development Project � (9:20) B' Appointment Of Board Committees -- E. Shelley /9:35\ 10. Final Adoption Of Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual -- H. 8renCh Resolution Adopting Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual (9:40) 11 . Dedication Status Of District Lands and Proposed Changes in Procedures -- H. Gr8nch Resolution Ratifying Dedication of Certain District Lands to Public Open Space Purposes Resolution Adopting an Amended Policy for the Dedication of District Lands (9!55) 12. Revision of Authorized Signatories for District Accounts and Safe Deposit Boxes -- J. Fiddes Resolution Establishing Financial Instrument Signatories of the District for Santa Clara County Accounts Resolution Approving Certificate of Authority of Officers (First Interstate Bank of California) Resolution Authorizing Signing and Endorsing Checks and Other Instruments for Savings Account (First Interstate Bank of California - Los Altos) Resolution Authorizing Signing and Endorsing Checks and Other Instruments for Checking Account (First 'Interstate Bank of California - Los Altos) Resolution Establishing Signatories for Entering Safe Deposit Boxes (First Interstate Bank of California - Los Altos) (10:00) 13. Renewal of Investment Authority -- H. Grench Resolution Authorizing Certain Board Employees to Invest Temporarily Idle Funds in Securities Allowed by Government Code (10:05) INFORMATIONAL REPORTS CLAIMS CLOSED SESSION (Land Negotiation and Litigation Matters) ADJOURNMENT TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: When an item you've concerned with appeaAz on the agenda, the Chait wiU invite you to addA",s the Board at that time; on othet matte,c,s, you may addAes,s the Board under OAat Communicationz. (An aetetnative is to comment to the Board by a Wkitten Communication, which the Boatd appteciates. ) Each speakeA wiU oAdinatity be Zimited to three minutes. When &ecognized, ptease begin by stating your name and addbtas. We teque-st that you JiU out the Jotam provided and ptesent it to the Recotding SectetaAy so that yout name and addtess can be accuAatety inctuded in the min utu *Times are estimated. Agenda is subject to change of order. ---------------- ..��.. ON..m< MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMO TO THE FILE'S January 23, 1986 SUBJECT: Dedication Status of District Lands and Proposed Changes in Procedure January 22 , 1986 Regular Meeting Refer to Resolution 86-E ' in Resolution :=4le for actual resolution, and exhibit ` adopted by Board ratifyingdedication of certain District tin Dist, �c� lands to public open space purposes . Exhibit was amended at meeting to dedicate previously undedicated Limekiln Canyon properties , except for the former Carter property. Q i I I Meeting 86-01 �'.rioeirr�r r.A�'1G , MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 375 DISTEL CIRCLE,SUITE D-1,LOS ALTOS,CALIFORNIA 94022 (415)965.4717 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS JANUARY 8 , 1986 MINUTES I. ROLL CALL President Teena Henshaw called the meeting to order at 7 :37 P.M. Members Present: Katherine Duffy, Daniel Wendin , Teena Henshaw, Edward Shelley, Harry Turner , and Richard Bishop. Members Absent: Nonette Hanko. Personnel Present: Herbert Grench , Craig Britton , David Hansen, Jean Fiddes, Mary Hale, Stanley Norton, Michael Foster, James Boland, Del Woods, and Cecilia Cyrier. II . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE President Henshaw led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. T. Henshaw requested the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance be placed on a future agenda for discussion of possibly reciting the Pledge only once a year or at the first meeting in February, when it would be easier to contact a Scout troop to lead the Pledge, rather than- the first meeting in January. III . APPROVAL OF MINUTES A) December 11 , 1985 Motion: E. Shelley moved the approval of the minutes of December 11, 1985. K. Duffy seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. B) December 18 1985 Motion: E. Shelley moved the approval of the minutes of December 18, 1985 . K. Duffy seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. IV. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS C. Cyrier stated there were no written communications. V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Harry Haeussler, 1094 Highland Circle, Los Altos asked if Brown Act conformity would be discussed at the January 15 Special Meeting. R. Bishop said that the Committee would not be ready to report back to the Board on that issue at the January 15 meeting, and D. Wendin added that the Committee would, however, be asking for further instructions relative to the Brown Act at the meeting. Herbert A.Grench,General Manager Board of Directors:Katherine Duffy,Nonette G.Hanko,Teena Henshaw,Richard S.Bishop,Edward G.Shelley,Harry A.Turner,Daniel G.Wendin Meeting 86-01 Page 2 Jim Warren, 345 Swett Road, Woodside, said that he understood that the District might need computer help or advice for upcoming projects and that he would be willing to assist at no cost. VI. ADOPTION OF AGENDA T. Henshaw said the agenda was adopted by Board consensus. VII. BOARD BUSINESS A. Election of Board Officers for 1986 (Memorandum M-86-01 of January 2 , 1986) J. Fiddes reviewed the procedure for election of Board officers and conducted the election. The following members of the Board were elected to serve as officers during ::he coming year: President - Edward Shelley Vice President - Daniel Wendin Treasurer - Teena Henshaw Secretary - Katherine Duffy Following brief speeches and the exchange of a plaque presented to the Board by the Ranger staff, President E. Shelley began chairinq the meeting. B. Publicity Plan for Acquisition Policies Including Eminent Domain (Report R-86-07 of January -3 , 1986) H. Grench reviewed the development of the Master Plan and the broad-brush definition of the planning areas within the District boundaries. M. Hale explained that the forthcoming brochure could be as specific as possible, discussing not only eminent domain but also covering Board policy and land acquisition in general , or it could be comprehensive to clarify in lay language all the various opportunities available to landowners. She outlined the three options available for distribution of publicity: an all-inclusive list which would be expensive and might cause concern to indi- viduals not within District's planning area; a specialized mailing list to only those landowners within District's planning area; or use of existing Brown Act list as well as homeowners ' associations and others who have shown interest. C. Britton reported on the complexity of attaining a specialized list of names of those landowners within the District's planning area based on use of the County Assessor's records. Initial Board discussion centered on whether any Board action should be taken on this agenda item at this meeting or wait until after the policy was addressed at the January 15 Special Meeting. E. Shelley proposed the Board discuss the matter, but refer it back to the Committee before taking any action. Meeting 86-01 Page 3 D. Wendin enumerated the types of individuals who, he felt, might be notified in addition to those on the Brown Act list: 1) those owners of parcels over 20 acres; 2) homeowner associations; 3) other organizations , and 4) interested individuals who did not fall in the previous three groups. For clarification purposes , H. Grench described the anticipated content of the brochure: explanation of Board's policy; explana- tion of how District acquires land; and the planning process for use of the lands. He noted that this information would be in lay terms. Jim Warren said he would like to see the notification policy as part of eminent domain policy and have exact language included in publicity material , as well as an explanation in lay terms . Harry Haeussler said he felt everyone in the District should be notified of the Board's policy. Ed Vallerga, 950 Purissima Road, Woodside, said that he was concerned about receiving direct notice of any change in policy regarding eminent domain; that he would favor a special list for this purpose in addition to the list of people on the Brown Act list; and that he hoped that whatever policy was to be adopted would be ready for consideration at next week 's Special meeting. Janet Schwind representing the South Skyline Association said that she encouraged the Board to go on with their plan of notifi- cation based primarily upon the Brown Act list. Beez Jones, 16891 Stevens Canyon Road, Cupertino, suggested that ,notification of eminent domain policies be sent to the individual members of city councils and board of supervisors. K. Duffy suggested that a member of the public could serve on the Board committee that reviews the text of the brochure. Motion: D. Wendin moved that this item be tabled until next week for further direction from the Board after the public hearing on eminent domain. K. Duffy seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0 . Discussion: E. Shelley spoke against K. Duffy's sugges- tion of having a member of the public on the Committee, feeling it was the Board's responsibility to consider various viewpoints. C. Use and Management Plan Review for the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve - Limekiln Canyon and Kennedy Road Areas (Report R-86-06 of January 2 , 1986) D. Hansen introduced the staff report, and D. Woods, using the wall map, reviewed the County' s planning considerations for Lexington Reservoir currently available for the Limekiln Canyon Area as they relate to District planning. He said the trail Meeting 86-01 Page 4 crossing considerations for Highway 17 are of great concern. K. Duffy stated she felt that a pedestrian and trail crossing would have to be included in the County's plans. D. Woods indicated that staff will respond to the County when a plan is available for review. Slides were shown which delineated where the proposed parking area and the County recreational facilities would be located. D. Woods then reported on the consultant study completed on the .feasibility of a parking area in the Kennedy Road Area, staff' s meeting with the Town of Los Gatos planning staff to discuss the possibility of a cooperative plan for the management of the Kennedy Road Area and Los Gatos Creek Park, and the con- cerns voiced by the public at the neighborhood workshop. D. Hansen said that staff was recommending the dedictition -of'the Limekiln Canvon Area, except for the former Carter property, for public open space purposes while maintaining the right to transfer density credits. S. Norton said that dedication of the property would not preclude transfer of density rights thereafter, and that the Board should so indicate its intent to retain this option when dedicating the property. D. Wood responded to questions posed by Jim Warren and Harry Haeussler regarding present equestrian access in the Kennedy Road Area. Motion: D. Wendin moved that the Board tentatively adopt the Revised Use and Management Plan for the Limekiln Canyon and Kennedy Road Areas of the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve and indicate their intention to dedicate the Limekiln Canyon Area, excluding the former Carter property, for public open space purposes, while main- taining the right to transfer density credits at a later time. T. Henshaw seconded the motion. Discussion: D. Wendin said he was assuming that tenta- tive adoption of the recommendations also included tentative approval of the parking area as proposed by staff. D. Hansen indicated that staff would apply for the permit to construct the lot. The motion passed 6 to 0 . D. Award of Contracts far Skyline Ridge and Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserves to Complete Parking and Access Facility Plans and Specifications (Report R-86-03 of January 2 , 1986) D. Hansen reviewed the criteria used by the selection committee in recommending awarding the contract to Ortha Zebroski, Landscape Architect, and indicated it had been a difficult decision because the two top candidates were very well qualified. Meeting 86-01 Page 5 Motion: H. Turner moved that the Board award the Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve and Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve contracts to Ortha Zebroski, Landscape Architect, to complete the plans and specifications for access facilities to both Preserves, and that the President of the Board execute these same contracts for completion under the timeline mentioned in the report. R. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. On behalf of the Board, E. Shelley presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Tom Williams 175 Calvert Drive, Cupertino, in recognition of his outstanding volunteer work on a volunteer project describing redwood groves on the Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve. He said that the material will be used by Save-the-Redwoods League to identify memorial groves for fund- raising purposes to recapture some of the $2 million the League contributed toward the purchase of this property. E. Adoption of Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual (Report R-86-05 of January 2 , 1986) H. Grench provided background development from the original report on Salary, Fringe Benefits and Personnel Systems of May 1979 to current document presented for Board adoption. H. Grench introduced the item, and J. Fiddes reviewed the needs for a comprehensive manual regarding personnel policies and procedures and indicated that all District staff members had been given the opportunity to review and comment on the manual at various times during its development. She presented a brief overview, highlighting the content of the manual . She also explained that it is being recommended that the holiday schedule be amended so the District staff would observe January 20 as Martin Luther King, Jr. Day in lieu of the February 13 Lincoln 's Birthday holiday. D. Wendin indicated that the report did not reflect that various drafts had been presented to the Board in Closed Session and that this should be reflected in some general way for the record. He also indicated his belief that it was inappropriate to adopt the manual at this meeting because this was the first time the public had seen it and they should be given an opportunity for comment. In light of D. Wendin ' s comments, it was decided that tentative adoption was in order followed by a second reading. H. Grench asked, however, that the Board approve the Martin Luther King, Jr. , holiday change at this time. Motion: K. Duffy moved that the Board tentatively adopt the manual. R. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0 . Motion: K. Duffy moved that the District observe Martin Luther King, Jr. Day in exchange for the Lincoln's Birthday holiday. T. Henshaw seconded the motion. The motion r passed 6 to 0. Meeting 86-01 Page 6 F. Recommendation on Compensation Adjustments for Board Appointed Staff Members (Report R-86-02 of December 18 , 1985) E. Shelley, on behalf of the other Committee members, recommended that the compensation for Board appointees be discussed and voted upon individually. He then reviewed the nature of the Controller's position and the Committee's recommendation for the position as contained in the report. In addition, he also recommended that the retroactive component of the salaries be paid interest at the rate the District has earned interest on these moneys. Motion: R. Bishop moved that the Board increase the Controller's pay from $3,500 to $3 ,800 retroactive to May 1 , 1985 , noting the District has received excellent services from M. Foster and the salary is not a true measure of his worth to the District. T. Henshaw seconded the motion. Motion to Amend; E. Shelley moved to amend the motion to pay interest on the retroactive pay since although it is nominal, but it is simply fair and reasonable because of the Board's delay beyond July I in completing the process. K. Duffy seconded the motion. Discussion: D. Wendin, speaking to the motion to amend, said he would prefer addressing the question of interest on the retroactive amount as to all three Board appointees as a separate motion. E. Shelley withdrew his motion to amend. The motion passed 6 to 0. -E. Shelley reported that for Legal Counsel the Committee was recommending a nominal inflationary increase in compensation from $52,780 to $55,480 with no increase in the level of service in terms of number of hours of service for the District. In response to Jim Warren' s question as to whether this was a full-time position, E. Shelley said the. position was on a retainer basis. Jim Warren quoted salaries for various San Mateo County full-time court officials and said the Legal Counsel ' s fees should be aligned with the fees of other public agencies and legal counsels. D. Wendin said that the District provides no infrastructure for this position and it is truly a retainer basis; however, when litigation calls for additional hours such compensation is arranged. Motion: R. Bishop moved that the Board increase the compensation of Legal Counsel from the present level to $55 ,480 annually, retroactive to July 1, 1985. K. Duffy seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. E. Shelley said the Board Committee was fortunate in retaining the services of George Sipel, an independent consultant to provide comparable data and recommendations for the General Manager' s compensation this year, since Mr. Sipel had prepared a Meeting 86-01 Page 7 similar report in 1981. He said the Board Committee recommended a nominal increase of $3,000; that the five-day administrative leave be made a permanent benefit; and that a six-months severance period be effective if employment is terminated without cause. Jim Warren urged the Board to table the issue of the General Manager' s compensation based on its competitiveness with other salaries. He felt the Board should "bite the bullet and hold the line" and base its decision on administrative talent required and the complexity of administration needed. D. Wendin indicated he would favor a fixed four-months severance , period disregarding when employment is gained, and noted this issue could be addressed next year. Nio-1-ion: R. Bishop moved that the Board increase the General Manager's annual salary by $3000 per year retroactive to July 1 , 1985 , and approve the five-day administrative leave as permanent, and approve the Committee' s recommen- dation on increasing the severance period from three to six months for salary and benefits be approved. H. Turner seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. Motion: E. Shelley moved that the delayed retroactive pay for the three persons be also paid interest at the average rate of 9% to 9h% that the District earned on its surplus funds over that period. H. Turner seconded the motion. Discussion: In making the motion, E. Shelley noted that relatively insignificant amounts were involved and that the Board should have completed its task six to nine months ago. D. Wendin said he supported the motion but suggested the interest rate be fixed at 9% so no one has to do any further calculation. E. Shelley agreed the interest rate should be fixed at 9% and changed his motion accordingly. R. Bishop quoted a legal maxim that means "the law does not concern itself with trifles" and said that he was against the retroactive interest because he considered the issue a trifle. The motion passed 5 to 1 . R. Bishop voted against the motion for his stated reason. VIII . INFORMATIONAL REPORTS H. Grench reported on his attendance at the President' s Commission on Americans outdoors hearing and reception. He indicated one of the main reasons for forming the Commission and holding the hearings was the future of the Land and Water Grant Conservation Fund which is due to expire in 1989. H. Grench announced that the Not-So-Annual Regional Park and Open Space District Conference is being sponsored by the Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District this year at Monterey Bay Aquarium on Saturday, May 17. Meeting 86-01 Page 8 H. Grench distributed copies of the Board Committees Membership report to the Board for advance review. H. Turner whimsically quipped with E. Shelley regarding the length of District agendas and time allocations for each item. D. Wendin announced that the City of Los Altos and the Town of Los Altos Hills was holding a Mayor' s banquet at the cost of $70 per couple and inquired as to whether there was a precedent for the District attendance at this event. No one remembered such a precedent. IX. CLAIMS Motion: R. Bishop moved approval of Revised Claims 86-01. H. Turner seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0 . X. CLOSED SESSION S. Norton stated that no litigation matters would be discussed during the Closed Session. The Board recessed to Closed Session at 10 :55 P.M. XI. ADJOURNMENT The Board reconvened to adjourn at 11 :44 P.M. Cecilia A. Cyrier Secretary REVISED CLAIMS No_ 86-Oi Meeting 86-01 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Date: January 8, 1986 C L A I M S Amount Name Description }051 373.81 AT&T Informations Systems y Telephone Equipment �052 1 ,000.00 California Advocates, Inc. Legislative Consultant Fee for Qecember 053 108.35 Clement Communications, Inc. Safety Posters 054 235.00 Dun & Bradstreet Seminar--John Escobar and David Topley 055 23,00 Federal Express Express Mail 056 4, 152.51 First Interstate Bank Note Paying Fees �057 200.00 Edmund A. Guidice Instruction Fee for Seminar 1058 38-95 Mary ' e a E. H� 11059 8, _ Private `Vehicle Expense �r' Harbinger • ^ znicatir,� 060 1 ,375.00 Hodnick Design Design Consulting I1661 475.00 Holtzmann, Wise & Shepard,Dr. Legal Services--Hoskin 062 10.00 g Midpeninsula Environmental Education Alliance Membership Dues ID63 105.94 Mobil Oil Credit Corporation Fuel for District Vehicles b64 160.49 Noble Ford Tractor Parts for District Vehicles )65 49.54 Oil Heat Engineering Furnace Repairs )66 398.53 On-Line Business Systems, Inc. Computer Services )67 64.57 Pacific Bell Telephone Service )68 31 .30 Peninsula Office Supply Office Supplies )69 101 .08 San Francisco Water Department Water Service )70 50.00 County of Santa Clara Zoning Map Set 17I 700.00 E. R. Sheehan Consulting Services for Trail-Layout R2 192.95 Value Business Systems . Equipment Maintenance 173 706.82 Xerox Corporation Maintenance and Supplies i74 139.25 Petty Cash Private Vehicle Expense, Meal Conferences, Out-of-Town Meeting Expense Office and Field Supplies M-86-12 (Meeting, 86-03 OOF January 22 , 1986) idew MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 16 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: Resolution of Commendation for Lennie Roberts Discussion: Lennie Roberts is being honored on Sunday, February 2 at the Familv Farm in Woodside. This event, called "The Many Facets of Lennie, " is sponsored by the Committee for Green Foothills. You may sign up through the Committee (327-5906) at $25 per person (the event is a fundraiser also) . Director Turner asked that a resolution commending Lennie be placed on your January 22 agenda so that it could be presented to her on February 2. A copy of the formal resolution will be available at your January 22 meeting. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt a Resolution Commending Lennie Roberts for Her Service to the Midpeninsula in the Preservation of "Open Space for Room to Breathe" . i P 9 t r RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT COMMENDING LENNIE ROBERTS FOR HER SERVICE TO THE MIDPENINSULA IN THE PRESERVATION OF "OPEN SPACE FOR ROOM TO BREATHE" WHEREAS, in 1971 and 1972 Lennie Roberts passed petitions, spore at many public meetings, and lobbied intensively to have southern San Mateo County included in the original Midpeninsula Regional Park District only to suffer the disappointment of the unsuccessful results of her efforts, and WHEREAS, in 1975 and 1976 she did the same thine all over again, this time in a successful annexation measure, and WHEREAS , she has been a pe_sisten.t and dependable watcher of San Mateo County government and the premier effective spokes- person on all manner of environmental, land use, and park and open space issues, presenting an articulate, reasonable, and consistent viewpoint in the public interest, and WHEREAS, in particular she has fought to preserve the open space and rural character of the Skyline area, and WHEREAS, she is President of People for Open Space and has been extremely active in the Committee for Green Foothills, p the Peninsula Conservation Center, the Serpentine Protection League, to name a few, and WHEREAS, she includes the total human environment in her perspective, as for example, evidenced by her active participation in the Midpeninsula Citizens for Fair Housing, and WHEREAS, she is an avid hiker, student and teacher of nature study, and photographer. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does commend Lennie Roberts for her years of continuing service toward environmental protection in general and toward "Open Space for Room to Breathe" in particular on the occasion of the celebration by the Committee for Green Foothills and Other Friends of "The Many Facets of Lennie Roberts. " III RESPONSE. ACTION PROPOSED BY STAFF Board President Acknowledge/ResponL = Director Acknowledge/Respond Skyline StaffAcknowledge/Respond — i3forieal Draft Response Attached Staff Directed to Prepare Draft e Responsese for Board Consideration per �/� Board Directive(s) IIL��..77TVV/v vv Other Board of Directors , Midpeninsulla Regional Open Space District 375 Distel Circle, Suite D-1 Los Altos, California 94022 January 20, 1986 Dear Directors, In two meetings with your staff, Bill Bartosh and myself, representing the Skyline Historical Society Board of Directors, explored the possibility of a Historical Center on the Districts Skyline Ranch site. Our Board of Directors has decided after a meeting with Dave Hanson and our, entire Board that if a facility that would meet our needs could be cons- tructed at that site that we would be interested. The Skyline Historical Society was formed in March, 1982 by a group of residents dedicated to preserving the History of the Skyline Area of San Mateo, Santa Cruz and Santa Clara Counties. The Society is a tax exempt California Corporation with the status of 23701d of the Revenue and Taxation Code and Federal tax exempt status of 501 (C) (3) . The Board of Directors of the Skyline Historical Society are: Robert Fisse President and Acting Treasurer Larry Hassett 1st Vice President Bill Bartosh 2nd Vice President Virginia McKim Secretary Jody Fork Director George Dueker Director Since the Society inception two sites have been offered to us on which to build a Historical Center. The first was the Ja�lue Littlefield parcel on Sky- line Blvd. and the second a one acre parcel on the southern boundry of the. RR Ranch developement adjacent to your Russian Ridge Preserve. Colin Peters, the developer of the RR Ranch is a strong advocate of establishingo"Historical Cen- ter as an adjunct to his developement and has committed 'himself to donating the site to us. think that at this time we would like to explore the subject of the Skyline Ranch as a location for the Historical Center. When can we discuss this matter with your Board? Perhaps a one or two Director Committee of c+1r.'Boards would be the best format. Please advise as soon as possible. Sincerely Pr es i dent Rt.2, Box 346 La Honda,Ca 94020 r I RESPONSE ACTION PROPOSED BY STAF! — Board President Acknowledge/Respond — Director Acknowledge/Respond _ Staff Acknowledge/Respond — Draft Response Attached _J!!� Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft Response for Board Consideration per Board Directive(s) Other December 26, 1985 Board of Directors ?,Tidpeninsiila Regional open Space District 375 Distel Circle suite -D-1 Los I,-ltos, California 94022 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen The Purpose of this letter is to PsK �Ton to reconsider"' amour policy of prohibiting use of the trail fror-,, T ovipte, Parr in Los Gatos (at the end Of Jones !goad) to T,exinFton Dam, and man; other runners, have enjoired the use 0'f this trai l for years. , 77e were recently told b, 701ir ra.n6ers tl�,.at the trail 7. is closed and thnt anyone using it ,"Till be cited. e �ere told vq.t there are "hazards" along the trail, that you have crews wortring in the area, and that there is a boundry dispute the Jesuits. (7e confirmed by a phone Coll to 7-our office that this is Board Pol- icy.) Those of us that "blazed" the trail question the present "ha,7- ards" . . The crews woricing in the area consist of those doing per- iodic brush. clearance on a very limited scale. Surel7r the use of the trail in the vicinity Of Novitiate Park- (the area of the boundr7 dispute) can't impact the Jesuits . On December 5, 1985 we were stopred bar ,rour rang ers I�rl-o were trimming brush and told that if we came ti-rcii-gh again Tre -rolild be cited . (There were no signs savingthe t 1, 0 trail Was closed. ) "'e tried to reqsun 1ritij them but tt-ey 'P'e r e insistnnt . Tliev said the Board had ordered the trail closed 7p it -, q keen it closed . t-,,_ejr djjt�/ to e asj,- that instead of the "Tiard line,, oxrressed b-7 101'r rangers you take the position that the trail mn_ 7 be subiect to r' er* 4-odic short term clomire ("-hen conditions -bsoTiiIte1,_77- reallire closrre' . ) and t at people can use the trail LI at Otl-:(nr times at t'-eir Own risk. The present situation is particularl-,, frus t-rat to those of wh o ho have run "the hill,, for years . Before_ ' t h e District, the Town of Los Gatos and the 13'tate srent :-�,, 3.7 Millicrito aef7uire t�,'e land we had full access to it . As soon as the rnrch,.ise 1,78.s made, a fence was installed limiting access from tI.e north slde of the h-,* !!. e limited our access to the south side of the hill. ),,Ovl �rcu have closed the s�th side of tI,e hill_ . if this stsr.ds, it �,lontt have been a vei r good investi-,ent as tar as the hikers and runners are concerned. Ll Mary Way Los Gatos, California 95030 i i I 1. r M-86-08 (Meeting 86-03 January 22 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 15 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager SUBJECT: Presentation on Total Access Camping Through the good offices of Phyllis Cangemi and the local Whole Access Project, Mr. Burt Wallrich, a coordinator of the Total Access Camping Project in southern California' s Santa Monica Mountains , will be present to give a brief informational slide show and answer questions at your January 22 meeting. The Project, a 501 (c) (3) non-profit corporation, is an innovative attempt to get adults and families with members having physical and sensory disabilities out into 160 acres of national park land in the Santa Monica Mountains. This involves the building of barrier-free facilities without destruction of the natural setting. This is, of course, of great interest to the District at the current time due to the Whole Access trails and other facilities currently in the planning stages for both the Skyline Ridge and Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserves as well as other District sites. A project proposal is attached for your perusal to familiarize you with this Project before the presentation. I 1 Whole Access Project PRESS RELEASE THE WHOLE ACCESS PROJECT, A LOCAL ORGANIZATION THAT IS WORKING IN COOPERATION WITH PARKS AND SPECIAL NEEDS AGENCIES IN THE SAN FRANC'ISCO BAY AREA TO IMPROVE THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PEOPLE, INCLUDING THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, TO PARTICIPATE IN THE OUTDOOR RECREATION AND NATURE EXPERIENCE, WILL SPONSOR A TALK AND SLIDE SHOW BY : MR. BURT WALLRICH ON TOTAL ACCESS CAMPING AN EXCITING AND INNOVATIVE PROJECT WHICH WILL CREATE A BARRIER- FREE OUTDOOR RECREATION AND NATURE STUDY CAMP FOR ADULTS AND FAMILIES IN THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS . THIS TALK WILL TAKE PLACE ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 231 1986, AT 7:30 P .M. AT THE SYNTEX AUDITORIUM 3401 HILLVIEW AVENUE, PALO ALTO DIRECTIONS : ON HILLVIEW, OFF OF FOOTHILL EXPRESSWAY . HILLVIEW IS BETWEEN PAGE [111-1- AND ARASTRADERO ROADS , SYNTEX IS ACROSS FOOTHILL EXPRESSWAY FROM THE PALO ALTO VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CALL THE WHOLE ACCESS PROJECT, AT (415) 363-2647; TDD NUMBER IS (415) 363-2648. SUGGESTED CONTRIBUTION : $5 .00/SENIORS $2 . 50 517 Lincoln Avenue Redwood City, CA 94061 415/363-2647 *415/363-2648 *Telecommunication Device for Deaf Communication i THE NEED Although Southern California is home to more than one million adults with physical disabilities and one million, three hundred thousand people over age sixty-five, the area offers only very limited opportunities for outdoor recrea- tion, camping and environmental study that are fully usable by these groups. This is both a deprivation in itself, and a factor that serves to isolate them from their families, friends and the general society. None of the area ' s family camps are fully wheelchair accessible nor do they offer the special equipment and pro- grams needed to allow people with a wide range of disabili- ties to make full use of thei-;i. mere are tent and RV camp- sites that have been made accessible, and they are used by many people who have some degree of impairment. However, many others who have severe disabilities find it difficult or impossible to sleep on the ground or on a cot, need com- plete toileting facilities to maintain hygiene, and feel a strong need for privacy for their toileting and other per- sonal care. There are also traditional camps for handicapped children, some of which set aside one or two weeks a year for adults with disabilities. But their physical facilities are designed for children, and adult couples find themselves separated in sex-segregated dormitories. Also, these camps are typically not "mainstreamed" , but deal with people with disabilities as a population removed from the general public. Not only does this lack of barrier-free family facili- ties mean that large numbers of seniors and people with disabilities are denied the benefits of outdoor recreation but, equally important, their families and friends are con- tinually faced with the choice of either excluding them from group activities or else accepting the physical barriers to their access as limitations on the whole group. Either way, someone feels deprived and someone feels guilty. Under these circumstances, outdoor recreation may do more to corrode the bonds that unite family and friends than to strengthen them. For some, the frustrations of outdoor recreation are so great that they finally give it up alto- gether; others never have the opportunity to experience it. THE PROJECT Total Access Camping proposes to build and operate the first residential family camp and nature-study center in California especially designed to accomodate the needs of seniors and adults with physical and sensory disabilities. There, they will be able to share outdoor recreation and the beauty of nature with their families and friends, with prob- lems of inaccessibility reduced to a minimum. PROJECT PROPOSAL TOTAL ACCESS CAMPING A Non-profit Corporation - 501 (c) (3 ) 10835 Ringwood Avenue Santa Fe Springs, California 90670 (213 ) 864-6896 � � After two years of negotiation with various government agencies , we have succeeded in having 160 acres of National � Pack land in the Santa Monica Mountains put aside for this � project . Less than Len acres will be developed for the camp buildings ; the remain"der will be kept as a nature preserve | for the education and enjoyment of the people staying at the ! camp , as well as for those visiting it on a day-use basis . � The nature preserve area will be made accessible through | provision of special equipment such as quiet electric wheel- chairs , frequent resting places , and bird-watching blinds � that are usable by a seated person. Minimal modifications � will make trails usable by people in chairs and those who � are sight-impaired . ?lens ror the year-round activities at the camp are based on the returns from o questionnaire we distributed to over 16 , 000 adults with disabilities living in Southern California . (Copy attached) They will center around the nature preserve and will include guided and self-guided hikes and interpretive programs . Arts and crafts , sports,, and theater are also planned . Special programs and day care will be offered for children at family memsionm. Other sessions will be for adults only . Plans call for four lodges , each with six bedrooms and � baths , o social area , and a kitchen ; a dining hall/multi- purpose building and a ramped therapy pool . All buildings, including administrative areas , will be fully accessible for | | persons with a very wide range of disabilities . There will / � be sufficient trained staff to provide individual assistance � as needed � ^ | � The camp will demonstrate that this kind of recreation � can be fully available to , and thoroughly enjoyable for , all people without destruction of the natural setting . | � Everyone will be welcome , whether or not they have special � requirements . � | BENEFITS - FAMILIES � | While thewill b camp w e open to everyone - ooudisehIed � � and disabled , people alone , with groups of friends , or with their families - the primacy focus is no the family that in- cludes both disabled and uondioabled members . As Judy Hoyt , � � Program Director of the Association for the Support of Human � Service , Inc . , in Westfield , M&, noted : � | ' � o . . .one common concern among educational and � recreational professionals is the apparent lack � of interest in bringing programs to the entire � � family and not just to the family member who is ) disabled . There appears to be few attempts -if � � � ` � -2- | � | � | � � any at all - to systematically introduce the outdoor environment as an integral medium in which to help the family grow in a number of dimensiooa . n� People with disabilities and elderly people who are becomin� increasingly dependent often find that the inter- personal stresses within their families are o greater life problem than their physical condition itself . For example , � there is an 80% rate of failure in marriages where one part- � oer contracts Multiple Sclerosis , usually because the well � spouse cannot deal with the changes caused by the disease , � and leaves . ** Even where the family remains together , the relation- ships are often overloaded vicb ne8ative shared experiences � and lacking in opportunities for sharing the ordinary posi- tive experiences that are an important part of the fabric of � family life. As Carolyn Vaoh° formerly Deputy Director of / the California Department of Rehabilitation writes : � *Disability is a family affair Only one ' | ' owns ' ^ ^ ^ member of the family the disability , but all are affected , and to some extent handicapped , by | it . The birth of a disabled child , discovery of o | degenerative disease in a youth , the catastrophic � injury of a parent , u grandparent having a stroke , - or any other disablement befalling any family | member can have as far-reaching , intense an impact on the others as on the one who becomes disabled . � - "All experience shock , fear , pain , and the | anxiety of wondering what the future implications will he . The disability of one may alter the lifestyles of family members as much or more than | that of the disabled one . . .All experience loos . . . which generates disappointment , frustration , and anger as freedom, and time for fun , dioappear . ''*m- i ( � Tbere is no one correct way to deal with this problem � and the emotional suffering it can cause the children and | adults involved . Our approach is to offer seniors , people with disabilities , and the people who relate closely to them, an opportunity to share experiences and insights with others in similar life situations . The lodges we build will be large enough to house several families , but small enough � to encourage the growth of friendship and confidence during the apmo of u camp session. Evening discussions in the main building will Otva larger groups a chance to come together . *Judy Hoyt . The Bradford Pa Vol . IV , p . lg. ��Commuoicatiouf el Goldman , Patient Services Coordinator , National Multiple Sclerosis Society , Southern California Chapter . .**Carolyn Vaab , Speech at Rehabilitation Research and Training Center ; Houston , TX ; December 9 , 1982 . ' | � _3_ � � Experience has shown that when families that share / similar , stressful life situations are together for even a � few days in a relaxed , supportive setting they are likely to develop informal peer counseling networks through wbLn& they | help- each other cope with their prnhlem's . Thus , without � coo�rootiog the campers with an overtly therapeutic program, which many would resist , the project will provide a setting conducive to therapeutic change . | This approach is patterned in large part on the success- ful family camping program developed by Camp Courage , at Maple Lake , Minnesota . -_ & difference is that their family camping program is an adjunct to their cbiIdreue * program, and they arrived at their present approach Lbzoa8b several � years of trial and error ; we have the advantage of building oil cbeir experience . � � BENEFITS - SENIORS � � � & facility and program suitable tor people with all . � � types of disabilities will also be suitable for frail elder- ly � people , and it is our goal to serve that population also . In fact , there is considerable overlap between the two � groups , with 40% of persons over the age of 65 having some � degree of disability , and 17% of them buvioQ a severe � impairment , according to government figures.** ` � He have investigated the recreational needs and prefer- ences of senior adults , and especially frail elderly people. � This has involved both consultation with geriatrics profes- sionals and distribution of e questionnaire similar to the � one distributed to adults with disabilities. While the physical needs of the elderly will be met by � � a program designed for the disabled , subjective factors � dictate that special consideration must be given to seniors if we are to be successful in serving large numbers of them. | � For example , while some elderly people enjoy the opportunity for inter-generational socializing , many do not . Also , a � great many elderly people resist being included in programs � that are defined as programs for people with disabilities. | � To take account of these preferences , there will be � some aeaeioua each year with attendance limited to seniors . | � *Communication from Robert Pollaod , Director of Camp � Courage ; Maple Lake, MN. A visit to Camp Courage in June, | | � 1983 , was important in the development of our concept , as � was consultation with the Directors of a camp near Mel- bourne , Australia with similar goals . *"Sources : Los Angeles County Bureau of Statistics . | � DeJoo8 & Lifchez , "Physical Disability and public Policy" . � ; 248 : 8 (June , 1983) , page 40ff . � ^| � -4- � � � | � (0f course-, seniors will also be welcome at other sessions , if that is their choice . ) We will also prepare special out- | � reacb -materials to be distributed through senior service | centers and similar channels . Two- to four-day sessions � organized through neighborhood Senior Clubs will provide a � way of reaching this population and of utilizing the camp in � mid-week periods. � � BENEFITS - INDIVIDUALS Another common need of adults who are in a dependent position within their families because of advanced age or a disability is for respite from the tensions of the home sit- uation . Nevertheless , a lack of suitable settings makes � this one of the hardest needs to fulfill . Our program will � be designed and staffed to make it possible for adults with even very severe disabilities to vacation at the camp by � themselves if they choose , and still receive the care or assistance they require . ^ Improved exercise is another benefit this project offers the individual . For people with disabilities and for elderly people who are becoming frail , the problems inherent in their condition are often greatly magnified by general debility from lack of exercise . If the physical activity they were used to is no longer possible , they often lack another program of regular , suitable exercise to replace it . To help such people develop a regimen of exercises tailored to their individual conditions , we will have students of Recreation Therapy performing their internships at our facility . This is also bow we will be able to offer the level of staffing required for e program that promises total � accessibility without incurring a prohibitive payroll . | BENEFITS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC Beyond the obvious benefits in having a well-planned , | well-run family camp and nature-study center available to | the vast population that lives in the area from Sao Diego to . Santa Barbara , there is particular benefit in bringing non- disabled people together with persons who have disabilities | on terms of equality . Project Interdependence, a joint venture by the Cali- fornia Departments of Rehabilitation and Education , has created dramatic shifts in attitudes of the ooudiaabled pup- latloo by conducting camping trips involving high school � students with and without disabilities in equal uumbers | ^ They bovc obo�o that when the ooudiaabled students return to school they are not only less likely themselves to stereo- type people with disabilities , tbe'y also have a significant | impact on the general attitudes within the school . 5- | — | The Southern California coordinators for Project Inter- dependence have expressed interest in using the Total Access facility for their camping trips , depending on the final design of the site . We will seek their input during our planning to learn from their experience and maximize the likelihood of that happening . FUNDING Total Access Camping is a tax-exempt , non-profit ( 501 [ c ] [ 31 ) California corporation, incorporated in May , 1983. The project is proposed as a partnership between the public and private sectors , with government providing the site on a long-term lease and foundations , corporations , com:7unity organizations , and interested individuals provid- ing funds for planning , construction , and start-up. We have already received planning grants from several foundations and corporations ( see list , attached ) , as well as donations from many individuals who are potential users of the facil- ity. We have been receiving generous assistance from volun- teers in both technical and non-technical capacities. The project will function without subsidy once it is operational . An independent consulting firm has conducted an in-depth conomic feasibility study and concluded that a facility of the size proposed , operating year-round , can be self-sustaining with fees set at a very reasonable rate. (A copy of this study is available upon request . ) Total Access Camping is committed to a policy that no- one with a significant disability , or over 65 years old , j will be barred from attending the camp because of cost , and we will do fund-raising and solicit camperships from out- side sources to aid those for whom even a reasonable fee would be a barrier . THE ORGANIZATION The Board of Directors of Total Access Camping is made up of people with a broad range of relevant expertise . The Advisory Committee , which is an active part of the organiza- tion , includes some of the most respected people in Southern California in the fields of disability service , recreation and nature study . We are working to further strengthen the Board so it will be capable of both creating a new and innovative pro- ject and running it in a responsible and business-like manner . New members are being recruited , and the Board has embarked on a course of training workshops offered by the Kellogg Foundation/United Way Training Center . -6- RESULTS TO DATE Although the project is not yet in operation , some positive results have already been achieved as a result of the intensive outreach that has been done . ( 1 ) The Angeles Chapter of the Sierra Club has established a Recreation Outdoor Access for the Disabled (ROAD) Commit- tee as a direct result of contacts between the Chapter and Total Access Camping. The Committee has evaluated a number of trails in the Santa Monica Mountains to assess their potential for being made barrier-free , and has established constructive working relationships with State and National Park and Santa Plonica Mountains Conservancy offices , to work toward "hot goal . -E :e Committee has also had an impact with- in the Angeles Chapter , which has responded to its call to make more meetings and outings accessible to persons with disabilities . The Executive Director of Total Access Camp- ing serves as Secretary for the ROAD Committee . ( 2) The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy has funded a project through the Easter Seal Society to work specifically with the District Office of the State Department of Parks and Recreation to achieve maximum accessibility to all State Park facilities in this region . The Director of this pro- ject also acknowledges the key role of Total Access. Camping in creating awareness of the need for this effort . These efforts to develop more barrier-free day-use facilities in the Santa Monica Mountains are complementary to the Total Access Camping plan to build a fully accessible overnight facility there . When open , Total Access Camping will attract many seniors and people with disabilities to the Santa Monicas who otherwise would not come there , and it will be an advantage to have as many nearby accessible re- creation options for them as possible. On the other hand , it can be expected that many people who first come to the Mountains as a result of the ROAD Committee or Easter Seal efforts will choose to come back for an extended stay at the Total Access Camping facility . -7- IV. BACKGROUND: (t) Have you taken camping vacations in the past? Yes ❑ 20 No ❑ (2) If "Yes", where? (CHECK AS MANY AS APPLY) Beach 021 Mountains ❑ 22 Lake ❑23 Desert ❑ 24 River ❑ 25 Coast ❑ 26 (3) What did you especially enjoy there? Nature Study ❑ 27 Hiking ❑ 2e (CHECK AS MANY AS APPLY) Sports ❑ 29 Boating 0 3o Arts/Crafts ❑31 Fishing ❑ .3z Horseback riding ❑33Swimming ❑ 34 (4) Did you have a disability at that time? Other (please name) Yes ❑36 35 No ❑ (5) If "Yes",were there barriers to access that cut down your enjoyment there? Yes 037 No ❑ (6)What were the barriers? 2e (7) What did you do about the barriers? Left early 039 Put up with the problem 041 Never went back ❑4D Figured a way mound the problem ❑42 (8) Have you ever decided not to take a camping vacation because? Accessibiiity problems ❑ 43 FOLD (CHECK AS MANY AS APPLY) Couldn't co with family ❑ 44 HERE Couldn't go with friends ❑ 45 Other(specify) V. FOOD We plan to offer reasonably-priced meals in a dining hail, and possibly also have an accessible kitchen In each lodge that campers can use. (1) If there is a choice at camp, would you (and your family or friends) Prepare all your own meals ❑ 46 (CHECK ONE): Prepare most meals ❑ 47 Prepare a few meals only ❑ 46 Buy all meats in dining hall ❑49 (2) Do you have a special diet? Yes 0 5o No ❑ (3) If "Yes", describe it briefly VI. GENERAL: 53 (1) What is your age? 17 to 25 51 i 26 to 35 Li 36 to 45 0 46 to 65 Cl over 66 u (2) What is Your disabling condition (CHECK ANY THAT APPLY) Sight-impaired ❑ss Hearing-impaired 057 Paraplegia ❑ 5e Quadriplegia ❑ ss Neurologic (Inc. M.S., M.D., A.L.S.) OBD Endocrine(inc.diabetes) ❑ cs Cardiac-Pulmonary ❑61 Amputation (what limb(s)? ❑68 FOLD Orthopedic (Inc. post-polio, stroke) CI 62 Developmental disability HERE p y(inc.cerebral palsy) ❑67 Rheumatic disease (inc. arthritis, lupus) ❑ 63 Other(please specify } C76e Blood disorders (inc. hemophilia, sickle-cell disease)❑64 (3) Does your disability cause you to have special problems with Heat❑69 Smog ❑7o Cold❑71 (CHECK ANY THAT APPLY): Dampness❑72 Altitude❑73 (4) Do you belong to any organization working for the rights of people with disabilities? Yes ❑74 No ❑ VII. COMMENTS: We are interested in any comments you have about our project,and your suggestions about how we can make it better: Thank you again for taking the time to help us. If you would like to receive a report on this survey,and information about our camp as the project develops, fill in the section below: NAME 75 ❑ Check here if you do not want your name used on other mailing lists. ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP When you are done, fold the page in thirds on the dotted lines, so OUR ADDRESS IS OUTSIDE Staple or tape it closed on all 3 sides, and put it In the mail. NO STAMP NECESSARY. _i r 6 9 Z 9 9 t £ Z t OL906 VD `s2u(adS al e;ueS anuaAV poonnSulZI S£80L 9N1dWV:) SS3:ate ldl®1 33Ss3v6cy As alVd 39 nIM 3ovisod 019MVO'SON1 494E d1NVS 9E'ON11Wl13d SStl70I:SVI'A r, IM Ald38� SS3Nisne S 7 S03i N 35VISOd ON -------- _ ------------------�++--g—�--------------------------------- — —�— _3H3N QUE FOR ADULTS WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITY We are designing a camp and nature-study center for adults to attend alone,or with their spouse, their children,parents, or friends.Welcoming everyone, it will be designed to be fully usable by people with disabilities. Family-style lodges,dining hall, and all other facilities will be equipped for sight and hearing impaired, and will be wheelchair accessible. It will be located in Southern California coastal mountains, and be open year-round. , To help us make our camp fully usable by and enjoyable to people with a variety of special needs, we would appreciate your filling out this short questionnaire. Thank you. 1. INTEREST: N (1) Would you like to come to a camp if it, and trails nearby, were completely accessible? Yes ❑ 1 No ❑ P (2) If you answered "Yes", would you come (CHECK AS MANY AS APPLY): By yourself ❑2 With friends ❑3 With your spouse ❑4 With your children ❑5 With your parents ❑e II. PROGRAM: Listed below are some camp activities. We would like to offer them all, but funding or site limitations may force us to FOLD make choices. To help us know which are most important, please number them from 1 to 12 in order of interest. MERE (Number I . . . activities you are most interested in; Number 12 . . . activities you are least interested in.) Trails through the woods: wheelchair accessible; Swimming pool with ramp, power lift, immersible loaner electric chairs chairs available T 12 Birding and nature-study hikes led by a naturalist (on Therapeutic exercise program the accessible trails), with signing interpreter --- 73 s Fishing, accessible, with adaptive equipment — A self-guiding nature trail (with talking boxes for sight- Boating canoeing 14 9 or impaired) _ g — 9 75 Archery _ Active sports: basketball, tennis, etc. — 76 10 i Queter sports: horseshoes, shuffleboard Arts and crafts 17 11 Space to be alone 18 Others(please name as many as you wish, but do not number them) 111. TRANSPORTATION: If the camp is located within a two-hour drive of your home, would you Arrange your own transportation' ❑ (CHECK ONE): Need us to provide transportation 19 (van with lift) 0 TOTAL ACCESS CAMPING REPORT: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY RESPONSES SUMMARY: The population surveyed - adults with disabilities living in Southern California - enjoys camping but signifi- cant numbers of them encounter problems serious enough to cause them to decide not to take camping vacations. The respondents rank nature-oriented program choices high, and sports low. DISTRIBUTION: 16 ,195 questionnaires were distributed through 41 channels (see list on last page) . 666 responses were tabu- lated. Adding returns from the pre-test phase and some that arrived after tabulation was completed, more than 700 people responded. The over-all rate of return, 4.2%, -while reasonable for this kind of survey, is meaningless as a measure of interest in the project because the methods used by the different agencies for distribution to the potential respondents varied greatly. For individual agencies, the rate of return ranged from only slightly over 1 % in a few cases (generally where the questionnaire was placed on a table or in a literature rack) to 10.1 % in the case of CAPH. The CAPH return rate is particularly significant because it includes people from a broad age range, with the full gamut of disabilities, residing all over Southern California. Distribution of a special version of the questionnaire to seniors started very late and was not pushed vigorously. We have only 19 responses from that version. Of course, many of the other respondents are seniors: DISTRIBUTION BY AGE: 17 - 25 89 46 - 65 213 26 - 35 155 65 and over 55* 36 - 45 138 ATTEND WITH WHO? People were asked who they would like to attend camp with. Their answers support the need for a camp that is designed for families and friendship groups: With friends 441 With parents 117 Come alone 307 With club or group 14** With spouse 252 With grandchildren 8** With children 160 With siblings 3** *Because people left blanks or gave multiple responses, the totals on each item do not add up to 666. **Items marked with double stars were only offered on the few questionnaires distributed to seniors. PROGRAM CHOICES: With the value of the most popular choice = 100%, the other scores are shown as a percentage of that value. -------------------------------------------------------------- Trails through the woods 100% Hikes led by a 65% w/loaner motorized chairs naturalist Swimming pool:accessible 89% Space to be alone 64% Fishing 77% Arts & crafts 61 % Self-guiding nature 70% Quiet sports 50% trail Exercise program 69% Archery 34% Boating/canoeing 69% Active sports 34% ------------------------------------------------------------- A number of other choices were written in. The 3 mentioned most often, and the number of times mentioned are: Barbecues and campfires ( 34) ; Horseback riding (34) ;, Singing and music (29 ) . TRANSPORTATION: Of the 666 respondents, 222 would want or need us to provide van transportation to the camp. BACKGROUND: 82% of respondents report having been camping in the past. 55% of respondents have been camping while having a disability. 84% of those who have been camping while having a disability report encountering barriers that cut down their enjoyment. WHAT THEY DID ABOUT THOSE BARRIERS Figured a way around. . .201 Never went back. . .52 Put up with problem. . . .171 Left early. . . . . . . .32 63% of respondents have decided not to take a camping vacation at some time: REASONS FOR NOT GOING CAMPING Access problems 0 . 000 . 00-43 Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . .23** Couldn' t go w/friends. .122 Transportation. . .22** Couldn't go w/family. . .105 --Discussion: inability to go with family or friends could be related to disability because the traditional camps for peo- ple with disabilities are segregated; a family or group that includes both able-bodied and people with disabilities cannot attend together. Transportation is a greater life problem for many people with disabilities than it is for the general population. Statistically, disability and lack of disposable income are also related. -2- MEAL CHOICES: In the camp situation, most people would choose to buy all or most of their meals so a dining facility is important. However, a sizable minority would choose to prepare most or all their meals, so it is desirable to offer that option, also. Buy all meals. . . . . . . 169 Prepare most meals. . . .167 Prepare few meals. . .225 Prepare all meals. . . . . .82 SUBTOTALS 394 (61 % ) 249 158 respondents have a special diet, but they are not signif- icantly more likely to want to prepare their own meals (42% vs. 39% of all respondents) . SPECIAL PROBLEMS: Our respondents report special problems with environmental conditions as follows: Cold. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .203 Smog. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .91 Heat. . . . . . 1 ?9 Altitude Dampness. . , . . . . . .110 COMMENTS: The most often expressed substantive comments, and the number of times each was mentioned, were about: Cost. . . . . . . . . .I. . . . . 22 Request RV/tent space. . . 12 Offers of help. , . . . 10 Environmental concern. . . 6 The great majority of comments were expressions of support and enthusiasm such as the following: "I would love it! The disabled should have camping experi- ences like anyone else." "I 've never been camping. I would like to go for my first time in life. I 'd love to! I don 't have money to go camping." "Thank God the out doors will be available." "Too soon to say. Never been anywhere with access before. " "I absolutely love to camp, and I 've been looking for something like this for a long time." "I would enjoy being outdoors with nature but without accessibility hassles." "I 'm excited about the idea. Please send me more questionnaires." "Great idea - Don' t forget secluded sites and wheel-in showers." "I 'm very excited about this project, its about time! Will you rent wheelchairs?" "If cost is reasonable, it would be a great boon to the handicapped community. " "It makes me feel better just thinking about it. Would be psychologically great. " "Please hurry and build this camp, we disabled need it. " A special thanks to Rosemary Young, who figured out how to tabulate the responses on our computer and then spent many hours entering data. -3- ORGANIZATIONS HELPING WITH DISTRIBUTION OF QUESTIONNAIRES Arthritis Foundation, Los Angeles Arthritis Foundation, Santa Barbara Multiple Sclerosis Society, Southern California Chapter United Cerebral Palsy/Spastic Childrens ' Society Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Rheumatology Department Easter Seal Society of California California State University at Fullerton Casa Colina Career Development Center Northridge Medical Foundation/Northridge Hospital Foundation Whittier Department of Parks and Recreation Westside Community for Independent Living Southeast Center for Independent Living Darrell McDaniel Independent Living Center Disabled Resources Center Grace Community Church, Special Ministries, Sun Valley California Association of the Physically Handicapped MERCI School Santa Barbara City College La Mirada Department of Human Services Veterans Administration Medical Center, Long Beach Veterans Administration Medical Center, Sepulveda Long Beach City College National Handicapped Sports and Recreation Association, Chapter California State University at Northridge California State University at Long Beach California State University at Los Angeles University of California at Santa Barbara Rehabilitation Institute of Southern California Los Angeles Mayor' s Office for the Handicapped Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, Senior Citizens Section California Paralyzed Veterans' Association Daniel Freeman Hospital, Fitness Center The Center for the Partially Sighted California Polytechnic University, Pomona Asian Rehabilitation Services Westside Regional Center for the Developmentally Disabled Fullerton City College Cerritos College Handi-Aid Company Westside Independent Services for the Elderly M-86-09 AA, (Meeting 86-03 ML of January 22 , 1986) 1qW41 0 kew MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 16 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: Clarification of Assignment to Land Acquisition Policy Committee Introduction: At your special meeting last night regarding eminent domain policies , an item was placed on the January 22 agenda to clarify what assignments the Board had previously given the Land Acquisition Policy Committee (also known as Eminent Domain Committee) regarding the Brown Act, acquisition outside District boundaries , and annexation. Discussion : The last report of the Committee to you regarding these items was introduced at your July 10 , 1985 meeting, carried over, and discussed at your July 24 meeting. Minute excerpts from the July 24 meeting are attached. Although these matters were continued to the August 14 meeting (see attached memorandum M-85-120, dated August 8 , 1985) , only eminent domain policy was discussed. I haven 't found any record of further Board or Committee discussion of these items , except as follows . At your meeting of December 11 you considered a letter from Harry H. Haeussler, Jr. regarding interpretation of the Brown Act. Attachments to his letter had been distributed at the November 25 Committee meeting (the most recent one) but no discussion ensued except to refer it to staff for analysis and to the Board. The Board referred the letter to staff (Legal Counsel) for a report to the Committee. No further direction was given to the Committee, according to the December 11 minutes. Recommendation: I recommend that you clarify what you would like the Committee to do with the remaining topics. The Committee, of course, was assigned last night to work on some minor refinements to the eminent domain policy language. Excerpts of Meeting 85-19 'Minutes of July 24, 1985 Page 2 V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Tom Kavanaugh, 1726 Spring Street, Mountain View requested the Board direct staff to respond to Dorothy Lyddon' s letter to the editor that appeared in the San Jose Mercury. He stated the salary for the new General Manager of the East Bay Regional District was $75,000 and relayed statistics about this District. Nadine Trewin, 91 Secluded Avenue, Redwood City stated her intent to mount a campaign to assure that the District and also County officials would allow dogs on leash in all parks, excluding picnic areas and very delicate areas. Harry Haeussler, 1094 Highland Circle, Los Altos asked for current status of the closure of preserves due to fires. D. Hansen stated that all of the preserves had been open for over a week and would remain open until further fire danger. William Obermayer of Portola Park Heights said Ano Nuevo State Park' s maps clearly outline property boundaries and trails, noting District maps could be done in a similar manner. He also inquired how the District' s lobbyist had saved some of the District's funding and expressed his opposition to the District having a lobbyist. Jim Warren, 345 Swett Road, Woodside, in reference to the Darling property acquisition of a week ago, asked why Bob Goldthwaite owner of the immediately adjacent parcel had not received notification of the hearing. C. Britton responded that notification to contiguous property owners follows the close of escrow so they can participate in final use and managemdnt planning if they so wish. Jim Warren, referring to a letter to C. Britton in which he had requested copies of certain District correspondence, questioned what files S. Norton has that belong to the District that do not involve active litigation. S. Norton responded he was not aware of any. Tom Kavanaugh said that letters addressed to property owners under threat of condemnation or given to property owners for IRS purposes should also be retained in District files. VI . SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY H. Grench introduced Cindy Quarton of Peninsula Open Space Trust and she presented a plaque to the District to acknowledge POST's partici- pation in partial funding for Monte Bello Open Space Preserve. She also indicated that POST had recently committed $16 ,600 to assist in development of Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve. VII . OLD BUSINESS WITH ACTION REQUESTED A. Further Discussion of Policies Regarding Procedures Pursuant to Brown Act Amendments , Acquisition of Land outside District - Boundaries and Annexation (Memorandum-M-8-5-112 date ff-July-15 , 1985) Brown Act D. Wendin stated that his position had not changed and that the list is necessary to protect the public and effective operation Meeting 85-19 Page 3 of the District. He said the Board needed to begin with the current list noting any single family owner of improved property could request to have their name removed from the list. E. Shelley said he too favored maintaining the list and that the value of the list would not be diminished by removing names of owners of improved property. R. Bishop said he favored eliminating the list and announcing at each meeting those properties to be discussed in Closed Session. He said that the property owner should receive a letter indicating that such a discussion is to be held, and that he believed the problem would be eliminated if an effective policy on eminent domain is adopted. He said he would not make a final decision on this item until the eminent domain policy was determined. K. Duffy said that if the list is not available the Board is locked out of their responsibility as elected public officials. She said a reasonable list should be retained. T. Henshaw said she would not make a decision on the Brown Act implementation until the eminent domain policy is known. She indicated she favored the retention of a reasonable list. E. Shelley added that a fairly broad list was needed because as discussion of one piece of property is occurring, the Board invariably questions its value and/or relationship to other properties. Harry Haeussler stated he felt the words "prior to" in the Brown Act meant notification immediately prior to a Closed Session. Candace Stone, President of the Portola Park Heights Homeowner 's Association, stated that notification should be made before a meeting and that, with the power of eminent domain, the District has enough resources and that the Board does not need to meet in Closed Session. William Obermayer stated that the list needed to be tied with the Master Plan and that the District should perhaps work on land acquisition in one area at a time. Jim Warren stated he supported a reasonable list and that if a list is to be retained, it should contain all relevant information. Charles Touchatt stated that if the initial list had been reason- able, people would not have been so concerned. Tom Kavanaugh said he wanted to be notified if the Board was going to discuss his property in Closed Session, and added the public should be informed if land outside the District was going to be purchased. C. Britton stated staff had anticipated refining the initial list and was awaiting direction from the Board. , Meeting 85-19 Page. 4 Jim Warren said that if District supplied parcel numbers he could supply corresponding names and addresses to assist the District. Sphere of Influence D. Wendin stated that the Committee had at first recommended that any significant extension of the sphere of influence be approved by voters of the entire District, but had later proposed the alternate consideration that any extension, significant or otherwise, would have to be approved by LAF CO hav ing jurisdiction. R. Bishop said he felt that there would be too much c expense and administrative handling involved if extensions were to be approved by voters of the District, and that, after further consideration, he felt th at at LAF CO proced ures ures provided adequate notice for interested people. He said he favored th e e P P present Committee recommendation. E. Shelley proposed the following wording for the recommendation: "District shall limit its acquisition through purchase to lands wholly within the District's boundary and sphere of influence. " R. Bishop stated that the sphere of influence was established by request from LAFCO to create an ultimate boundary of the District and that the sphere of influence may never again be extended. Tom Kavanaugh said that the District should not purchase any more property in Santa Cruz County until that County agrees to make payments to the District, and that he felt any acquisitions out- side the District ' s original boundary violated the original intent of the District. William Obermayer said that land should be bought only within the District boundary unless the Board has consent of all constituents to buy land outside the District. Annexation D. Wendin said that the stated policy was presently in effect. D. Wendin said he felt a Committee meeting was needed to discuss the contract concept and that transition provisions will need to be discussed. The Board concurred that the Committee would not be able to meet before the next Regular Meeting and that they were prepared to take an initial vote on the eminent domain, implementation of Brown Act amendments, acquisition of land outside the District boundaries and annexation of land policies at the August 14 Regular Meeting. B. Wording Approval for Cautionary- Signingfor Long Ridge Open S ace Preserve (Memorandum M-85-114 dated July l9i �d Memorandum M-85-115 dated Ju1y. 24 , 1985) D. Hansen summarized the two reports s and used the wall ma to P P delineate the road. �i M-85-120 (Meeting 85-21 August 14 , 1985) .., �, MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM August 8 , 1985 TO: . Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: Tentative Policy Decisions Regarding Use of Eminent Domain, Implementation of Brown Act Amendments , Acquisition of Land Outside District Boundaries and Annexation Discussion: At your July 24 meeting (refer to memorandum M-85-112 of July 15 , 1985) , you discussed and received additional public input on the draft policies regarding procedures pursuant to the Brown Act amendments , acquisition of land outside District boundaries and annexa- tion. In addition, the members of the Board present indicated they would be prepared to make initial policy decisions and tentatively adopt some subsets of the policies at the August 14 Regular Meeting. The attached draft policies, dated June 30, 1985, are the ones you have been most recently considering and were initially distributed for the July 10 meeting (see memorandum M-85-108 of July 3 , 1985) . Director V.endin, who served on the Eminent Domain Committee during Director Hanko' s absence, has recommended that the following statement be considered by the Board as a footnote to the proposed acquisition and sphere of influence policy in light of the fact that the District' s sphere of influence outside District boundaries has not yet been included in the Master Plan document. Transition Provision: Properties within the District' s sphere of influence outside the District's boundaries shall be treated as being in the planning areas designated in the District' s Master Plan. This provision shall remain in effect until the District 's Master Plan has been amended to include or exclude such from properties such planning areas. Conclusion: As discussed earlier, on August 14 you would make some initial policy decisions and tentatively adopt some portions of the policies regarding the use of eminent domain, implementation of Brown Act amendments, acquisition of land outside District boundaries and annexation. If appropriate, you could direct staff or request the Eminent Domain Committee to a revised draft epolicies of the for prepare your consideration, based on an action that you take 4 y y on August 1 . I recommend th at at you adopt th y p e process ss (including the role of staff) and timing that will be followed in tentatively adopting, reviewing, and finally adopting the four policies. i LAND ACQUISITION POLICIES Version I (Arty unimproved lot, with trigger, trail chly if subject to eminent domain} It is the desire of the District to acquire open space from willing sellers within the planning areas designated in the District's Master Plan. En-tinent drillr)-bit) 11-1514 tie used onlq in those instances where 611 reasonable attempts at voluntary negotiations fail and the property iri question is necessary to the open space program of the District; and where there are no feasible current or prospective alternate acquisitors that would achieve the District's objectives. In negotiations or discussions with landowners, the Distict staff shall not threaten aminent domain but will explain relevant law and District policy if the Subject is raised by the landowner. The Board shall approve a brochure .,,hick shall explain this policy, include information on the use of arbitration, open space easenie—nts'and contracts, and life estates, for example, and will encourage eminent domain exemption contracts7,s--je 'R—tact-i'ed) and private open space preservation. In establishing routes for trails, the District shall plan in consultation with and respect the privacy of developed communities. EMINENT DONAIN Eminent domain shall not be used to acquire all or anti part of an imp-Loved property that is not susceptible to furth6r subdivision. In addition the use of erninent domain shall not be considered except under flhe folloviing conditions: 1. there is a request or consent by those owning more than 50% of the fee interest in the property; 2. the property is unimproved and a subdivision application is filed (or was .pending as of May 1 , 1985) or a division of ownership is made, or an application for a building_permit is filed; 3. the property is improved and a subdivision Ivisii on application is filed Sor was pending as of May 1, 1965)-o—r6 division of ownership is made, but onlil the unimproved portion of t h e property may be acquired, provided that: rop.� L___ uired, a. the improvements and SUITOUndinq lands of no less than minimum lot size under the existing zoning district shall be exempt, and b. the owner shall be entitled to retain such easements as are needed for reasonable access and use of the property. 4. in a property that is susceptible to subdivision or is unimproved, n .pkrtion is required to connect two or more publicly owned park or open space parcels, subject to legal reqUiref-11P-I-ItS and the following conditions: Land Acquisition Policies 1 Draft - 30 June. 65 6. the, District Board finds it necessary to provide a trail connection beU.,leen the porcels, and b. the District hats been unable by voluntary means to acquire land to connect the parcels with a sate and useful trail, including significantly longer and less convenient trail route-0, and C. the land for the connecting trail shall not ordinarilq exceed 100 feet in width, and shall be as far from •any existing resiaence and as clos:-e to the property line as practicable, and d. the owner shall have the opportunityto des iate any additional portions of his/her land which mar incluYed by the District in the acquisition, rind e. the o%.%,ner shall be entitled to retain an easement over the land acquired bi .4 the District, where necessary, for access to the land retained by the owner. POliCi8S pUrsant to restraint of eminent domain shall be adopted by ordinance, legally noticed and freely publicized in a manner designed to reach the afte6tion of all property owners within f_hP_ Di,;trirt's planning areas. Definitions: 8. improvement --- legal or Legally non conforming residences, excluding trailer's,'mobile fiot-nes, and tet"riporary structures. b. improyed --- containing at least one improvement. C. P-L-OP-9—rty, an assessors .pa�cej Land Acquisition Policies 2 Draft - 30 June 65 i LAND ACOUSITIDN POLICIES Version 2 Change Version 1: exempt lot splits and Single lots, both if not for speculation, but use objective standaird) It i s the desire of the Distic:t to acquire open space from willinq sellers within the planning areas designated in the District's Master Pi an. Erninent dorriiDir► rrlaq b� used onIq in those instances where all reasonable atterr►pts at voluntary negotiations fail and the property in question is necessary to the open space program of the District; and where there are no feasible current or prospective alternate acquisitors that would achieve the District's objectives.. In negotiations or discussions with landwivners, the Distict staff strap not threaten eminent domain but ;.,till explain relevant lati.,r and District policy if the subject is raised bq the landowner. The Board shall approve a brochure which shall expfiain this polic_q, include information on the use of arbitration, open space easements and contracts, and life estates, for example, and .. ill encourage eminent domain exemption contracts?ree attaclir� and private open space preservation. In establishing routes for trails, the District shall plan in consultation with and respect the privacy of developed cornmuni ti es. EMINENT DUNAiN Eminent domain shall not be used to acquire all or any part of an improved property that is not susceptible to further subdivision. In addition, the use of eminent domain shall not be considered except under" th,e f o lo•rIing conditions: 1. there is a request or consent by rty; those owning more than 50% of the fee interest in the prope 2. the property is unimproved and a subdivision $ppiicatian is filedT r was pending as of May 1 . 1985 or a division of ownership is made, or an application for $ building_permit is filed;_provided that unimproved properties shall be exempt from eminent domain if: a. not susceptible to subdivision, and not. held for speculation 4property held by members of the same family for more than fF,?e years fs deemed not to be held for speculation; or h. susceptible to subdivision, and the division is into only two properties and is not done for speculation (during an ten year period, one division into two of a property heldy members of the same #arn y tl for more than five ears is deemed not to be done for speculation ; y 3. except as provided below at the end of this section the property is improved and a subdivision application is filed (o was pending as of Mag 1 , 1985 or a division of ownership is Land Acquisition Policies. 3 Draft - 30 June 85 l made, but only- theunim proved unim o I - _ ed portion of the property may be UILI red, Prov _d th, 0 a. the improvements and -c--urroundinq lands of n less. than minimum lot size under the et fisting isti g zoning di' -ict shall be exempt, and w b. the owner shall be entitled to retain such easements as are needed for reasonable access and use of the property. The improved property shall be exempt from eminent domain if TdTY i s i o n is into one only two properties and is not a for speculation. During any ten year period, one division into two of a property hold bymembers of the some familyfor more than five--years deemed not to be done for speculation_ 4. in a property w hich is susceptible to subdivision or, not susceptible, is unimproved but not held for speculation' as if provided in paragraph 2 above) - a portion is required to connect two or more p5_b_IicIU_. owned Dark' or open space parcels, subject to legal requirements and the followin-g—Condit or_oz. a. the District Board finds it necess6ry to provide a trail connection between the parcels-, and G. the District has been unable bq voluntarV means to acquire land to connect the F161-c8ls with 6 safe and useful trail, it'ICIUdinq sjgn�fzcantlU longer and less convenient trail routes, and C- the. land for the Connecting trail shall not ordinarilI4 exceed0 feet 88t in width, and sh ll be as 6r fron-i anq existinq residence and as Close to the property line as practicable, and' d. the o%,mer shall have the opportunity to designate any additional POrticif'is of his/Iner land which may fie includ'ed by the District in the ac-quisition, and e. the owner shall be entitled to retain an easement over the land acquired by the District, where necessary, for access to the land retained by the owner. Policies pursant to restraint of eminent domain shall be adopted by ordinance, legally noticed and freely publicized in a manner designed to reach the attention of all P-LO-p-grtu owners within the D�strYct's planning areas. Definitions: a. improvement legal or 1pinin I" non Conformjng residencies, excluding trailers, mobile homes, and temporary structures. b. improved --- containing at least one improvement- c. property --- one or more gontiquous assessor's parcels under common ownership. Land Acquisition Policies 4 Draft - 30 June 85 L WN ACT IMPLEMENTATION 1. aPT.10 IN Wi 4 E. Withdraw the current list - OPTIOIN TWO: Continue to maintain a list of properties which the District's negotiator is authorized to discuss with the Board in OnQP session but chose among the following : a. include onl properties for which those owning more than 50','9. of the err request to remain on the lfs�t- b- delete properties for which those owning more than 50% of the fee interest request to be removed I Fo—mthe list if the property is: an imp - _Loved property improved property not susceptible to subdivision Q _a pEop_grtU not susceptible to subdivision (4) any p r property __t_ tU 2. For those properties not on the list which are to be discussed at a closed session: a. list the properties and o'-Aners' narnes on the published agenda for VIE- 11"ieetinq's Closed Session if known at the time the agendais distributed, b. orally announce at the beginning of the public meetinq any properties to be discussed which were not included in the agenda, following the District's Pules of Procedure as to 6 dition of items to the Agenda, c. include in the minutes the names and identification of any P-Lop-ertyj.ubl i shed in or added to the agenda, d. if the landowners) is not already aware that his/her pU wilt property- — 11 be discussed in closed session,yiritten notice shall-be given to the owners Y of record, v.,hich shall be mailed at least 5 &iijq:::; prior to th t1t,19 at vihi the PI-oper-tq is to be discussed;�RLr, if_approv ed by the Board following the District's Rules of Procedure as to addition of -items to the Agenda. such notice shall be given as soon as practicable be fo—re -or at—ter tj"-ie meeting. - 3. This p lic -tall be publicized in a manner to be determined by the _p , shall Board af ter l.fie p -J.glicU is adopted. 4. The Board shall cause an explanatory letter to be written to all lando%,,,1ners or tenants vihom the District has good reason to believe v.,ere offended by the initial list published by the District. Land Acquis-ition Policies - Other` 1 Draf t - 30 June 65 e f i r,-it i C,n a. reques't --- the Di.strict will rnake request forms available to any I a n d ow ri e r. b. property --- one or more continguous assessors parcels _ under common ownership ACQUISITION AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE BOUNDARY The District shall limit its acquisition to lands viholly or partially within the District's 's boundary and sphere of influence. Any significant extension Of the sphere of influence shall be approved bq the'LAPCO having jurisdiction and the voters of the entire District. ALTERNATE: The District shrill limit its acquisition to lands wholly within the District's boundar-L An and sphere of influence. A -extension of thesphere Of influence shall be approved by the LAFCO ho ing urisdiction. ANNEXATIONS All annexations shall be according to State low and LAFCO procedures. Such anneXations shall be approv6d by property owners of ]end to be annexed. The District niaq consider annexation of lands owned b!4 the District or in which the District owns a legal interest; and wilt consider 6nnexatitc-ir, of properties or land area initiated by LAFCO or by petition. Land Acquisition Policies - Other 2 Draft - 30 June 65 r R-86-11 A. (Meeting 86-03 ,V1001 January 22 , 1986) J °'ice MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT January 16 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; J. Boland, Operations Supervisor SUBJECT: Information Regarding the Feasibility of Sheriff 's Patrol Assistance in the Mt. Umunhum Area at the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve Introduction: At your December 18, 1985 meeting you adopted the amended Interim Use and Management Plan for the Baldwin-Wallace property addition to the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve, Mt. Umunhum Area (see memorandum M-85-171, dated December 13 , 1985) . Partially in response to input from both the public and staff regarding the chronic off-road vehicle, drug and weapons violations which occur on or adjacent to the former Baldwin- Wallace parcels , you directed staff to return in one month with more in- formation regarding the feasibility of contract patrol assistance from the Santa Clara County Sheriff 's Department for the Mt. Umunhum Area of the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve in the vicinity of Hicks Road. Background: Shortly after the Lexington fire in July 1985 , the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors appropriated $84 ,000 for extra Sheriff 's patrol coverage in the "Lexington Hills" area which includes the Limekiln, Kennedy Road, and Mt. Umunhum Areas of the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. The extra patrol coverage has been in the form of both Sheriff 's Off-Road Enforcement (S .O.R.E. ) units and the more conventional road patrol sedan units. The scheduling of the motorcycle units , for the most part, has been confined to weekends and holidays . To date, the extra coverage appears to have reduced the incidents of illegal activities in the "Lexington Hills" area; however, off-road vehicle and weapons violations continue to occur on District property with regularity. Additionally, funding for the extra coverage was approved only for fiscal year 1985-1986 , in response to the high fire danger and the potential for destructive landslides during sub- sequent wet months . The Sheriff 's Department staff indicated that addi- tional funding for this project in future years is unlikely. If the funding is cut or significantly reduced, it is anticipated that the Sheriff 's pa- trol unit assigned to the Burbank area in unincorporated San Jose, will also continue to handle the Mt. Umunhum area on a low priority basis as it has in the past. Response time to the Hicks Road area of the Sierra Azul Pre- serve from Burbank is approximately 30 to 45 minutes . Discussion: The Santa Clara County Sheriff 's Department, which has ulti- mate law enforcement authority County wide, is very interested in assisting the District with a supplemental patrol program; albeit on a fee basis . The concept of a County agency charging a fee for a public service which is mandated by law is , unfortunately, a sign of the times for fiscally strap- i R-86-11 Page Two ped local governments. At the present time , the Sheriff 's Department indicates it is understaffed by 25 deputies for patrol services , and new deputies will continue to be assigned to the County jail to meet court man- dated staffing levels. Considering this information, contracting for pa- trol services on a fee basis appears to be the only way that good service might be provided. During meetings with the Sheriff 's Department personnel, staff discussed the following three possible alternatives : A) The first alternative, which several urban municipalities use, is one in which each deputy assigned is "dedicated" to the contracting agency for a fee of $85 to $90 per officer/per hour. For that amount, the contracting agency buys into a complete law enforcement package. All of the Sheriff 's Department 's resources in terms of patrol officer and vehicle, supervision and training, investigation, reports , police infor- mation networks, administrative overhead, etc. would be available at the abovementioned hourly costs. The adoption of this alternative usually requires the hiring of several officers as is done with the City of Saratoga, which contracts with the Sheriff 's Department for total law enforcement services. B) The second alternative appears to be one which matches more closely with District needs and interests. Under this plan the Sheriff 's De- partment would be augmenting the District 's own patrol staff, rather than functioning as a separate entity on its own. At a rate of $16 . 38 per hour for a deputy and patrol car, or $15 . 13 per hour if the deputy rides along in a District vehicle (at a 4 hour minimum) , the District would have the greatest flexibility to mix and match Rangers with deputies based on actual seasonal or problem period needs. During a supplemental patrol shift, the deputy remains under the official "umbrella" of the Sheriff 's Department; however, they would focus their attention on areas specified by the District, and include the enforce- ment of District ordinances as well as federal, State or local codes. Deputies assigned the supplemental shifts would not respond to "calls" away from the designated patrol zone except in the event of a serious emergency. Three of the most significant obstacles which could limit the success of a supplemental patrol assistance program are: 1) The deputy 's lack of familiarity with District sites and their points of access; 2) A general reluctance on the part of many deputies to venture very far from their patrol vehicles and into the back country where the problems often occur; and 3) A concern on staff 's part that deputies assigned the supplemental _ shiftmay not treat the "uninformed" violator with the same tact and diplomacy District Rangers have been trained to use. It is envisioned that if the District were to select the supplemental patrol approach, possibly as an experiment, a considerable amount of staff time would have to be devoted to developing and reviewing MROSD orientation programs for the deputies, a task which would have to be repeated each time a new officer was assigned the supplemental assist- ance shift. Additionally, it would be advantageous to identify this program as an experiment whereby staff could develop criteria for measuring the level of its success for future needs. F R-86-11 Page Three C1 The third alternative discussed with the Sheriff 's Deparment was the possibility of locating a deputy in a caretaker residence somewhere in the vicinity of Hicks or Mt. Umunhum. Roads . Under this approach, the caretaker/deputy would still work his or her assigned shift else- where, but be available to assist District Rangers on off-duty time. Because the deputy would still be working under the Sheriff 's Depart- ment 's umbrella, the hourly rate of $15 . 13 per hour would still apply. One obstacle to consider by using this approach is that there is no guarantee that the deputy's day-to-day availability would match the occasions when District Rangers require assistance. This approach, however, appears to have good potential for success if used in con- junction with alternative B. Review; The immediate goal appears to be re-establishing order and control on the newly acquired properties along Hicks Road, Mt. Umunhum. Road, and Woods Road in the Sierra Azul back country. District Rangers do not have the ability to respond to the more high risk incidents which now occur in the area. Although there is funding for extra Sheriff 's patrol in the "Lexington Hills" area for the 1985-1986 fiscal year, the outlook for addi- tional funding for rural patrol does not appear to be forthcoming. Conclusion: At the current time, staff considers that an adequate level of order and control could be achieved by blending the resources of the District and the Sheriff 's Department. The idea of locating a Sheriff 's deputy in a caretaker 's residence near the problem area combined with supplemental patrol assistance by the Sheriff 's Department, either in the form of Ranger with deputy ride-alongs or just the deputy as a single unit seem to have good potential. It is envisioned that, intitially, as much as 16-20 deputy hours per week would be required to establish a stronger sense of safety and order to the former Baldwin-Wallace and other high crime incident parcels , both along the road frontage and in the back coun- try. The installation of very sturdy protective barriers along the access to the Bald Mountain parcel off Mt. Umunhum. Road would also assist in reducing the incidents of illegal activities in that area. This item will be included in the Mt. Umunhum. Area Use and Management Review soon to be considered. Recommendation: I recommend that you review these alternatives carefully in terms of the District 's desired level of management control in the Sierra Azul area, the District 's obligation to assist in providing such control, the Ranger and public safety issues, the use of supplemental patrol assistance as a pilot project which, if successful, could be ex- panded to other District managed areas , and the actual cost benefit of the program. Staff will return at the time the Open Space Management Staffing Study is presented to you, or shortly thereafter, with specific recom- mendations on the utilization of Santa Clara County Sheriff 's Department deputies for supplemental law enforcement duties in the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve areas. I am not recommending Sheriff 's motorcycle patrol for consideration at this time. If installation and maintenance of protective barriers does not keep the intrusions to an acceptable level , Sheriff Is motorcycle patrol can be considered. It should be understood that in the entirety of this report I am referring to the stewardship responsibilities and obligations on District lands alone and not to the provision of additional law enforce- ment services to adjacent roads or private properties where many of the problems also occur. M-86-07 (Meeting 86-03 Jan. 22 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 15 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; D. Woods, Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Annual Review of Relative Site Emphasis Plan and Use and Management Plan Review Schedule Introduction: At your December 18 , 1985 meeting you reviewed the Relative Site Emphasis Plan and Use and Management Plan Review Schedule (see report R-85-56, dated December 12 , 1985) . The discussion following the presenta- tion focused on the proposed modifications to the existing Relative Site Emphasis Policy statements whereby a group of sites near the bottom of the list would be categorized "Minimal Use and Management. " Staff was asked to return at the time of the second reading with 1) a restatement of the rationale for creating the new category; 2) a definition of the category and criteria for including sites; 3) public relations implications; 4) consideration of sites at the bottom of the list having two identifica- tions for purposes of planning and management attention; and 5) impact on the planning process of the three year review cycle. These policy questions aside, you tentatively adopted the Revised Plan for Relative Emphasis of District Sites and the 1986 Use and Management Review Plan. Discussion: Staff has re-examined its rationale for introducing the concept of minimal use and management and the application thereof. The initial purpose of developing this concept was to respond to the ever increasing management responsibility of accommodating recreational use on sites which are relatively unemphasized and have severe limitations in regards to access and use and to staffs ability to offer adequate surveillance of recreational uses. In other words, a number of sites near the bottom of the Relative Site Emphasis list (and, for that matter, many newly acquired sites) have such described limitations that, in addition to the responsibility of normal site protection, an unstructured and even perhaps premature introduction of recreational use becomes difficult to manage. The E1 Corte de Madera Creek Open Space Preserve can be used to illustrate the impact that our current procedures have on the operations program. The site has received a normal level of publicity which has depicted the outstanding physical attributes of the property and has generated a sub- stantial amount of public interest in accessing the site for recreational uses. Upon request, the prospective visitor is provided a map, which ti M-86-07 Page two in itself is an encouragement to visit the site and thus increases public awareness and places staff more and more in a recreational management mode. The site, however, has severe limitations in that there is not 1) a really safe access route into the property; 2) a trail system that will not encourage trespass; and 3) a reasonable level of visitor assistance and protection. As a result of the public interest and these limitations , staff becomes significantly involved in the planning and management for the increasing recreational use. Accurate maps are being prepared to assist visitors in accessing the site and using the trail system. Trail improvements need to be made to insure visitor protection; a sign program has to be put in place to minimize confusion and trespass, and patrol is being stepped up to increase our presence. This approach, then, has a significant impact on the overall objectives of the Relative Site Emphasis Plan in that it can redirect staff efforts away from those public access projects being implemented for more empha- sized sites. The intent of developing the Minimal Use and Management category was a means by which these impacts could be reduced. The methodology suggested for accomplishing this was to limit, beyond existing practice, those aspects of site publicity, maps , information, and improve- ments relating to recreational use. On further examination, it does not appear that this is an appropriate approach to be uniformly applied to all of the unemphasized sites due to the uniqueness and diversity of each. This is not to say that the concept should not be further explored, but that it should probably be explored in context with the Open Space Mangement Planning Process, Since the concept relates more closely to publicity and management policies, whereas the intent of the Relative Site Emphasis Plan is to guide funding and staffing for site development in the broad sense. In other words, if a site is unemphasized it is understood that publicity and management considerations are minimal compared to sites higher on the list, but the extent of those considerations should be outlined in the Use and Management Plan. It is therefore recommended that this issue be deferred until the Open Space Management Planning Policies can be reviewed. At that time, staff will ask you to consider a similar concept to that of "minimal use and management" which will probably include the establishment of special management units encompassing areas that have the aforementioned severe access and patrol limitations. These management units, which could be referred to as Conservation Management Units (CMU) , would be selected using specific criteria and would be managed according to specific guide- lines developed to curtail public activities until the use obstacles could be overcome through the normal acquisition, planning, and develop- ment process. The Conservation Management Unit could be described as a unit of land having high natural resource value while at the same time being very limited in terms of existing recreational opportunities. These condi- tions dictate a management plan that emphasizes the protection of the site' s natural resources while deferring recreational use until such time M-86-07 Page three as it is physically practical and consistent with the Relative Site Emphasis Plan. A C.M.U. could be applied to an existing preserve, a portion of an existing (perhaps a non-contiguous) parcel , or a newly- acquired property. The guidelines for managing these units could include provisions for explicit information, in both publicity and site maps, regarding 1) access and recreational limitations and 2) the Conservation Management Unit policies. While review of the Open Space Management Planning Process is not included in the current Action Plan, these ideas will be investigated further in the next few months and brought back to you by July 1 , 1986 or, if pos- sible, due to the budget and staffing implications , before the final 1986-1987 fiscal year budget is adopted. At that time we will also be asking you to consider a change in policy regarding the scheduling of use and management reviews. Public relations implications will be discussed at that time. The schedule you have tentatively adopted is consistent with the current policy whereby all sites are reviewed within a two year period. Staff has suggested and you have concurred that it may be appropriate to review some sites on a three year basis, assuming that these sites are relatively unemphasized and there are no major land use issues expected to emerge during the interval. A change in this policy would not effect the proposed ' 1986 and 1987 schedule. Recommendation: I recommend that you approve the Annual Review of Relative Site Emphasis Plan and the 1986 Use and Management Plan Target Review Schedule as contained in report R-85-56 . PLAN F" RELATIVE EMPHASIS OF DISTRICT _ -'TES Funding/Staffing Priorities for FY 86-87 W W 0 W 1.oii(,cr Term Priorities for Emphasis (U r-i 4J r, 0 -14 k fn , , Pecent site additions (1985) Cd .,A ;-4 0J tz 0 14 0 ltaZ. - Prioritv coition chanaed Cd k Cd P4 P C3 P4 1. Skyline Ridge OSP* �` 2 b �a �b 7al � 2b Qk Restrooms 2. Monte Bello OSP 0 0 01 Ole 0 3. Rancho San Antonio OSP* House e) 0 lRemodel e 0!�I 4. Purisima Creek Redwoods OSP Backpack a lz!ka 0!!�ia ekl eL ekalCamp- Rest- b rooms, Water 5. Los Gatos Creek Park � 0 �2 01 �2 0 1 6. San Mateo County Baylands Reserve* 2 1 0 1 Alk 19 IF, 0 Water, 7. Picchetti Ranch Area Q 0 1 16�1 �1 61 is 0 lPicnic Area Restrooms 8. Saratoga Gap OSP 0 0 1 �1 0 0 9. Los Tranzos OSP 9 0 10. Windy Hill OSP 0 0 ! 11. Long Ridge OSP 1!•'l 0 12. Hassler 1&21 0 ®2 0 0 Seven 13. Fremont Older OSP* * SprRestoings b ration 14. Kennedy Road Area 21 f"2t e�4 �b 0 15. Russian Ridge OSP* 0 Q, �2 0 40 0 16. Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area qAftpk Windmill 0 0 0 0 1 b Repair 17. Stevens Creek Shoreline 0 0 0 WIM �l a 0 18. EZ Corte de Madera Creek OSP 0 0 0 �1 0 �n 01 19. Limekiln Canyon Area 0 0 .0 0 T1,41 0 , 20. Coal Creek OSP* 0 0 0 Q�l 0 121. El Sereno OSP* 0 0 0 22. La Horda Creek OSP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23. Foot!iills OSP 0 0 0 0 24. Thornewood OSP Q�J a (�ka Ia 0 0 0 25. '111t. Umuahum Area* 0 b 0 0 0 01010 26. Costanoan Way OSP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 27. Briggs Creek 00 ] talo 0 0 FY 86/87 Funding/S_taffii-ia. ,,Priorities Highest Priority Projects 1. Currently in U&M Plan Lower Priority Projects 2. Not yet in U&M Plan No projects anticipated (develop- a, District not to fund, ment considered adequate in FY 86/87) alternate funds sought 0 No projects anticipated (remain b. District to fund (partial or total) undeveloped in FY 86/87) if alternative funds unavailable TWO YEAR USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW SCHEDULE Proposed Target Schedule to be Approved Now Projected Target Schedule to be Reviewed _ 1-986 November/December 1987 Last PLANNING AREA Reviewed JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE ML AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC l.Hassler* 7/27/83 O 2.LaHonda Creek 4/25/84 +� Purisima Cr. Rwds 7/24/85 ! El Corte de Madera Creek 8/15/85 • 3.Los Trancos 3/13/P5 • Windy Hill 3/13/85 • Thornewood 7/10/85 • Coal Creek 5/23/84 _ • 4.Rancho S. Antonio* 10/10/84 • Windmill Pasture 3/9/83 • Foothills 3/9/83 ! 5.MBOSP-Page Mill 7/25/84 ' • Picchetti 10/23/85 • Saratoga Gap 11/20/85 • 6.Skyline Ridge 11/28/84 • • Long Ridge 10/24/84 O Russian Ridge 8/24/83 • a ._ 7.Fremont Older 3/14/84 • 8.El Sereno 10/26/83 • Costanoan Way 10/26/83 • 9.Los Gatos Crk, Pk. 9/12/84 • ! Sierra Azul* 11/9/83 • iO.St.Crk.Shoreline 11/14/84 : ! SM Co. Baylands 11/1- �i + • *Planning process to include public workshops due to anticipated significant changes in use and management and increLising public interest. M-86-10 (Meeting 86-03 January 22 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 16 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors I FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Final Adoption of the Revised Use and Management Plan for the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve - Limekiln Canyon and Kennedy Road Areas Introduction: The Use and Management Plan review for the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve was presented to you at your January 8 , 1986 meeting (see report R-86-06 , dated January 2 , 1986) . Final adoption of the Revised Use and Management Plan was delayed until your January 22 , 1986 meeting to allow for public comment. Discussion: At the meeting, staff noted the Santa Clara Valley Water Dis- trict had posted "No Trespassing" signs at the trailhead leading to the Priest Rock Area from Lexington Reservoir. Recent conversation with the Water District staff indicate the signs were installed to deter a recent increase in illegal off-road vehicle usage and to reduce the Water Dis- trict 's liability. The signs were not intended for hikers. Staff will continue to follow-up on this with County Parks and the Water District staff to assure that more appropriate signing is installed to discourage illegal uses but not to deter equestrians , hikers , and other legitimate users. To date staff has received no further public comment. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the Revised Use and Manage- ment Plan for the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve - Limekiln Canyon and P P Y Kennedy Road Areas (report R-86-06) and indicate your intention to dedi- cate the entire Limekiln Canyon Area with the exception of the non- contiguous former Carter property as public open space while maintaining the right to transfer density credits. The "intention to dedicate" would be in accordance with the revised Policies for Dedication of District Lands to be presented at 'your January 22 meeting (see report R-86-08 , dated January 13 , 1986) . If you do not change policy, then a resolution will be prepared for your Feb- ruary 12 meeting rather than waiting until December. I M-85-06 (Meeting 86-03 AA� January 22, 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 14, 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Final Adoption of Interim Use and Management Plan for the Atwood Property Addition to El Sereno Open Space Preserve Discussion: At your December 18, 1985 meeting, you approved the acquisition of the 29.95 acre Atwood property addition to El Sereno Open Space Preserve (see attached report R-85-57, dated December 12, 1985) . You also tentatively adopted the Interim Use and Management Plan for the property, named the land as an addition to El Sereno Open Space Preserve, and indicated your intention to withhold the prop- erty from dedication as public open space. In accordance with the adopted Land Acquisition Notification Procedures (see memoran- dum M-83-106, dated August 31, 1983) , final adoption of the Interim Use and Manage- ment Plan was deferred until after close of escrow to allow for public comment. Escrow on the 29.95 acre Atwood property closed on December 31, 1985. To date, staff has received no public comment. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the Interim Use and Management Plan for the Atwood property addition to El Sereno Open Space Preserve, including the naming, as contained in report R-85-57. I further recommend that you withhold the property from dedication as public open space at this time. The non-dedication recommendation is not a strong one. On one hand, without further adjacent acquisitions the parcel would not serve well for trail purposes. On the other hand, much of the rest of the Preserve is already in the category of a conser- vation area without trails. R-85-57 (Meeting 85-33 Dec. 18, 19 8 5) iiwmnc MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT December 12 , 1985 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: C. Britton, Land Acquisition Manager; D. Hansen, Land Manager; D. Woods , Open Space Planner; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Proposed Atwood Property addition to the E1 Sereno Open Space Preserve Introduction: The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space Distract has been offered the opportunityto purchase 29.95 acres o P f land adjacent to the El Serena Open Space Preserve. The heavily wooded property is located within the sphere of influence of the Town of Monte Sereno, in unincorporated Santa Clara County. A. Description of the Site c 1. Size, Location and Boundaries This 29. 95 acre parcel is contiguous to the western boundary of the El Sereno Open Space Preserve. Private property adjoins the site to the north, south and west. The town of Saratoga is located northeast of the subject property. 2. Topography, Geology and Natural Landscape The property is located on a northeast facing slope. The terrain is generally very steep; ,however, several moderately steep slopes originally anticipated for homesites do exist on the property. For the most part the site is densely wooded with a forest of Douglas fir, tanoak and bay laurel trees. A small area of chaparral is located in the northernmost area of the property. Several year-round springs are located on the property. The springs and other seasonal drainage on the property feed into tributaries of the San Tomas Aquinas Creek. Views from the property into the creek canyon and of the prominent ridge on the El Sereno Open Space Preserve help to create a remote feeling in the otherwise developed hillside neighborhood of Bohlman Road. t a R-85-57 Page 2 The site, like much of the El Sereno Open Space Preserve, is valuable scenic backdrop for the communities of Monte Sereno, Saratoga and Los Gatos and wildlife values are also considered very high for this densely wooded land. B. Planning Considerations The property is zoned rural residential by the County of Santa Clara. The property received the highest rating on the District's Master Plan map, a composite rating system of the suitability of land for open space acquisition. C. Current Use and Development Access to the property is provided by a 50 foot driveway easement' off Bohlman Road, which passes within 30 feet of an existing house. The easement area also serves as the driveway to the house. Beyond the house, the easement passes over three parcels, for a distance of approximately 1400 feet, prior to entering the subject property. The easement is not passable by vehicle at this time as it is over- grown with Scotch broom. The road enters the property from the west, turning southeasterly through the property. Springs have triggered a small landslide in the southern section of the site, thus blocking the road at that point. A second road, which is also overgrown, branches from the main road in the center of the site to enter the northern part of the property. Both roads appear to dead-end on the property. There are no structures on the property. D. Potential Use and Management The existing road system on the site may at some time lend itself to a connection to the existing trail system for the El Sereno Open Space Preserve. However, access to this property at present is such that a connection is not currently possible. Trail connections between El Sereno and Villa Montalvo could also be accommodated on site. Views from the property do make this an attractive addition to the existing Preserve, and the proximity to the Bohlman Road area creates the potential for a neighborhood access point to the Preserve. E. Interim Use and Management Recommendations Boundary plaques will be installed as necessary. F. Name The property should become an addition to the El Sereno Open Space Preserve and become known by that name. G. Dedication This property should be withheld from dedication as public open space at this time until a final determination of the Preserve' s boundaries can be made. i R-85-57 Page 3 H. Terms The total purchase price as stipulated in the attached Purchase Agreement would be $100 ,000 payable in cash at the close of escrow (an average of $3, 300/acre) . Funds for this purchase would come from the New Land Commitments budget category and specifically from the proceeds of the District 's 1985 note issue. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the accompanying Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Authorizing Acceptance of Purchase Agreement, Authorizing Officer to Execute Certificate of Acceptance of Grant to District, and Authorizing General Manager to Execute Any and All Other Documents Necessary to Closing of the Transaction (El Sereno Open Space Preserve - Atwood Property) I further recommend that you tentatively adopt the Interim Use and Management Plan recommendations contained in this report, including naming the property as an addition to the El Sereno Open Space Preserve, and indicate your intention to withhold the property from dedication. i I i .. ;� s 1 - - `; PROPOSED ACQUISITION � r lam/ ,` � � �} � f ��= � �� � •N �Vr \�•�•�� � i ` �' a r p' ��.9 i; `i Ly'� �... 1 }\ � `- � _ 1 -� � �'\ •� ��✓ 1��l 'mil�, .-t^ "nf�.-�.• �� Ir � F1� 'r y > ��'� ,���ji�\ '� � - � � 1� �\.�+ 1� '.ice 1`�� t r •-i� \�}:•:;:: g, _ �, ! ' ;, •; � � oy>, IN Ix (�1 Nu 18.94 .t-'\ $�Nilit �,' '` ���~, = - ';� �,!. 1, r >l;`•�; _. '` '' Vass_H ill �.;' ,l\ �\ � I , � � - _ \`✓ 1 .� �� `' � � lam-` i,. ���� T a _ � �. r!(-Cl r' ,,�/-\`J ' � = gs •.1 � \ \ � i r � .� z�n.\ � �,-�� ����I \� +�i `�J��f _� h-• - _ i.,\99J�Y/( �i:+ �F /, ..J��' � \ _ i : ff /J.i;: '�• ( J ��• ua '.s Res ._ � � �—`\ `• __-� � SPILLWAY.. 015_ � ��'Q`�_- � != - ♦ •'^ 1 �'\, �';--� .32 ` �. ��lr-�:..�sir ��r-�S�' �.�„ ,�.- t EL SERENO OPEN SPACE PRESERVE ��—_`� 6 '=��: 1 /• �k p ��, .mil �._Qo' ♦`a �J/// ack , SCALE 1" = 20001 NORTH v -r R-86-09 (Meeting 86-03 IML January 22 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT January 15 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: C. Britton, Land Acquisition Manager; D. Hansen, Land Manager; A. Cummings , Environmental Analyst SUBJECT: Land and Water Conservation Fund Application for Addition to Coal Creek Open Space Preserve Introduction: The Land and Water Conservation Fund program (LWCF) , as administered by the California State Department of Parks and Recreation, has been a major source of supplemental funding for local park agencies. The agencies ' share of the funds is allocated to each of the State 's ten planning districts primarily on the basis of population. The types of local projects funded are the acquisition or development of neighborhood, community, and regional parks . The Land and Water Conservation Fund is a reimbursement program based upon the funding allocation. Fifty percent of the actual project expenditures will be refunded (to a maximum of the grant amount) when the project has been completed. Projects are judged on their ability to meet the recrea- tional needs of the applicant ' s constituency, with priority given to prox- imity to high density residential areas , population mix, ready access , and service areas with the least amount of comparable recreational acreage. This year only $454 ,856 is allocated to planning area IV, which includes all of the nine Bay Area counties , compared to $660 ,958 last year. Only half of this amount is allocated for regional projects and the competition will be keen. The application deadline is February 17 , 1986 . I am recommending submittal of two grant applications for the 1986-1987 Land and Water Conservation Fund program, one for site development and one for property acquisition. This report describes the acquisition proposal for the Peninsula Open Space Trust (former Thomas property) addition to Coal Creek Open Space Preserve. The second submittal is outlined in report R-86- 10, dated January 15 , 1986 . The amount requested for this grant is $250 ,000 , representing one-half of the $500 ,000 cost of the acquisition. This attractively forested property includes both sides of the lower closed portion of Alpine Road and adjoins Coal Creek Open Space Preserve. Its purchase would provide a new access to Coal Creek from the lower or northern side of the Preserve and give the District the opportunity to work with San Mateo County on plans to reopen Alpine Road as a recreational bicycle or multipurpose trail route. A. Description of the Site 1. Size, Location, and Boundaries The proposed 100 acre addition to the District's 376 acre Coal R-86-09 Page 2 Creek Open Space Preserve is situated along Alpine Road in a rural, heavily wooded valley 3 miles southwest of Portola Valley. The parcel is irregularly shaped, without any structural improve- ments . The southern boundary adjoins Coal Creek Open Space Pre- serve, while the remaining boundaries adjoin private property. The parcel begins 100 feet south of the lower locked gate on Alpine Road, and includes approximately one mile of the closed portion of Alpine Road. Alpine Road intersects Page Mill Road approximately 3 miles east of the property while the Alpine/Portola Road intersection is 3 .2 miles to the northwest. 2 . Topography, Geology, and Natural Landscape The property is located on steep, heavily forested north-facing slopes above Corte Madera Creek. Corte Madera Creek forms the eastern 'boundary, and an unnamed tributary of Corte Madera Creek also flows through the property. Alpine Road was built along the eastern side of the ridge between Corte Madera Creek and this trib- utary. The road parallels the entire length of the northeasterly border on a winding course leading gradually upward from an eleva- tion of 1200 feet near the northern corner of the property to 1580 feet at its southeast corner. Elevations on the rest of the prop- erty range from a high of approximately 1760 feet at the western corner to a low of 1120 feet at the northern corner. The eastern one-third of the property is the most level portion. Much of the remainder has slopes greater than 50% . The property is within the rift zone of the San Andreas Fault and has been identi- fied by the U.S . Geological Survey as having severe slope insta- bility. Alpine is a dirt road extending the length of and beyond the prop- erty to Page Mill Road. The road is seriously eroded on two seg- ments within the parcel. A large slide has occurred 1250 feet from the locked gate. Alpine Road is typically 18 to 22 feet wide, and this slide has reduced the width to 8 feet along a strip approxi- mately 1/2 mile from the gate above the largest switchback. How- ever, although narrow, the road is still passable to vehicles. Much of the road is well drained and would be usable for ranger patrol vehicles throughout the rainy winter months as well as for the rec- reational uses previously mentioned. Vegetation is primarily mixed evergreen forest of oak, bay, and madrone, with Douglas fir and bay predominating in the canyon bot- toms . There are many scenic viewpoints and natural areas beside the road for resting or picnicking. B. Planning Considerations The property is located in unincorporated San Mateo County within the Sphere of Influence of Portola Valley. The County of San Mateo has jurisdiction for development because the property is not contiguous to a Portola Valley zoned parcel. The property is zoned RM (Resource Management) in which residential development is determined by slope- density calculations , geological conditions , and safe accessability. Open space use of the land is consistent with the General Plans for the Town of Portola Valley and for San Mateo County. R-86-09 Page Three According to a County density study, the site could support up to three building sites . The property is given a low to medium rating on the District 's Master Plan, which ranks the overall suitability of preserving the land as open space. C. Current Use and Development Use of the property centers on those areas on and adjacent to the mile- long section of Alpine Road within its boundaries. Until 1977 , upper Alpine Road was open to public vehicular traffic, when it was "tempo- rarily" closed by San Mateo County. For years prior to this closure, the road attracted campers and motorcyclists and was a notorious party area. The Sheriff 's Department was too understaffed to handle all the complaints resulting from these activities . These problems together with an extreme fire hazard brought on by the 1977 drought led the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors to close the road by means of two locked gates . The closure is still in effect. One gate is at Joaquin Road, 100 feet northwest of the property bound- ary; the other is just below the intersection with Page Mill Road. A pullout below the lower gate can accommodate the parking of three or four cars . At this time Alpine Road continues to be used by hikers , equestrians , and bicyclists . It also appears to be a popular dog-walking route. Motorcyclists , who gain access from a side trail just south of the gate, also use the road from time to time. In spite of this use, little litter is apparent. Without vehicular access, the previous littering and party problems have greatly decreased. A well traveled footpath parallels Alpine Road throughout the length of the property along the approximate crest line of the ridge. This path intersects the road at several points , allowing a variety of loop trips . The road is not visible from the path due to the dense forest, although the two are close together. The steep, rugged western half of the property has no trails . Just beyond the southern boundary of the property is Coal Creek Open Space Preserve and the lower end of Crazy Pete 's Road. A District trail branches west along Crazy Pete 's Road, bridges the creek and continues up to Skyline Boulevard. Alpine Road itself intersects Page Mill Road at a point adjoining the entrance road to the former Stal- lings property portion of Coal Creek Open Space Preserve. The District has patrol rights on the portions of Alpine Road which adjoin Coal Creek Open Space Preserve , but District rangers do not currently patrol down Alpine Road. D. Potential Use and Management The proposed acquisition not only offers an attractive area in which to hike or ride year round, but also offers the potential for imple- menting a major non-vehicular access route from the urban midpeninsula to Skyline Boulevard and to thousands of acres of ridgeline open space lands. There are few access roads to Skyline Boulevard, and those that exist are narrow, twisting, and steep. Bicyclists must ride within the traffic lanes since there is little room along the road edges. Paving beyond 86-09 Page Four the striped verges of Page Mill and La Honda Roads is very narrow and provides no safety protection for bicycle riders. However, these two roads currently offer the only route to Skyline Boulevard from the central midpeninsula. As a result, they are heavily used by bicyclists in spite of the danger. Alpine Road has long been regarded as a desirable bicycle route to Sky- line Boulevard (see Attachment "A") . The Alpine Road corridor is shown as an adopted route on both the San Mateo County Bikeways Plan (1976) and the Santa Clara County Regional Parks , Trails , and Scenic Highways Plan (1981) . In your meeting of October 27 , 1982 , you unanimously sup- ported pursuing a safe bicycle trail along the closed portion of Alpine Road. Acquisition of the subject property includes the underlying fee title to the portion of Alpine Road within property boundaries. There is a public easement along upper Alpine Road, which was established by a "viewers report" describing the road to the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors . This easement gives the County the obligation to maintain the road and the responsibility for safety as long as it remains a public road. Following acquisition, the District could approach the County to reopen the right of way on Alpine Road. A recent change in Transportation De- partment Agency (TDA) article 3 criteria now allows TDA funds to be used for maintenance of bikeways that are closed to motorized traffic. This would aid the County in implementing and maintaining a paved bi- cycle path along the closed portion of Alpine Road. The District could routinely patrol the road and manage the trail system. To provide a completely traffic-free route, the bicycle path could eventually con- tinue through Coal Creek Open Space Preserve to Skyline Boulevard. This would avoid the problem of bicyclists having to use the narrow twisting upper part of Page Mill Road. Reopening Alpine Road as a scenic recre- ational route in this way would provide a major service to bicyclists as well as hikers and equestrians. Alternately, the County could deny its obligations to maintain the road. The District could then request abandonment of the easement, and the road would revert to the underlying fee holders . The District could then do anything with the road including developing the proposed trail route. E. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance This acquisition qualifies for a categorical exemption. The attached "Notice of Exemption" has been filed with the San Mateo County Clerk. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the following attached Resolu- tion of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Approving the Application for Land and Water Conservation Funds for the Coal Creek Open Space Preserve Addition Project. Attachment "A" History of Upper Alpine Road Trail Planning (Upper Alpine Road refers to the portion of the road between the two locked gates . ) 1) March 21, 1975 Letter to San Mateo County Scenic Road Committee from A. Ginzton describing the potential for Alpine Road as a scenic recreation route. 2) 1976 San Mateo County Bikeways Plan shows Alpine Road Corridor as adopted route. 3) February 10 , 1977 San Mateo County Trails Committee map of adopted trail priorities shows trail from Portola Valley to Skyline Boulevard via Alpine Road. 4) 1977 Vista Verde Homeowners Association letter to San Mateo County Board of Supervisors re- questing closure of upper Alpine Road for the duration of the fire season (drought year) . 5) 1977 Town of Portola Valley supports closure - recommends upper Alpine "become a recreation route for pedestrian, equestrian, and bicycle traffic". 6) July 12 , 1977 San Mateo County Board of Supervisors passed resolution authorizing temporary closure of Alpine Road between Joaquin and Page Mill Roads because of fire danger. Director of Public Works authorized to determine length of closure. 7) 1977 (?) Town of Portola Valley adopted trails plan shows bicycle land along Alpine Road and hiking trail paralleling road. 8) 1977 San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Depart- ment proposes Alpine Road become biking, hiking, and riding trail. Board denies re- quest (Proposition 13 given as reason) . 9) 1981 Santa Clara County Regional Parks, Trails, and Scenic Highways Plan shows Alpine Road as adopted recreational trail route. 10) August 1982 Letter from Santa Clara County Trails and Pathways Committee to MROSD requesting bi- cycle path from Alpine Road to Skyline Boulevard across Coal Creek Open Space Preserve. Attachment "A" - Page - 11) September 22 , 1982 Letter from San Mateo County Bikeways Committee to San Mateo County Department of Public Works , initiating TDA application process for bicycle path on Alpine Road. 12) September 29 , 1982 Letter from San Mateo County Director of Public Works to San Mateo County Bikeways Committee denying support for bicycle path on Alpine. Reasons included: cost ($220 ,000 estimated for paved 8 ' wide 3 mile path) , little potential use, steep grade, mainten- ance and security costs , and not providing service to a "high use activity center" . 13) October 27 , 1982 MROSD Board meeting. Board unanimously supports safe bicycle trail along closed portion of Alpine. 14) May 1984 MROSD Use and Management Plan for Coal Creek. Staff directed to work with Santa Clara and San Mateo County trail committees to find a safe trail route from Alpine Road to Skyline Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 86 2 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUNDS FOR THE COAL CREEK OPEN SPACE PRESERVE ADDITION PROJECT WHEREAS, the Congress under Public Law 88-578 has authorized the establishment of a Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant-In-Aid Program, providing matching funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for acquiring lands and developing facilities for public outdoor recreation purposes; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation is responsible for the administration of the program within the State, setting up neces- sary rules and procedures governing application by local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said adopted procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of applications and the availability of local matching funds prior to submission of said applications to the State; and WHEREAS, the proposed addition project for the Coal Creek Open Space Preserve is consistent with the Statewide Comprehensive Recreation Resources Plan: Recreation in California, Issues and Actions : 1981-1985; and WHEREAS, the project must be compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the District hereby: 1. Approves the filing of an application for Land and Water Conser- vation Fund assistance, and 2 . Certifies that said agency has matching funds from property tax revenue and can finance 100 percent of the project, half of which will be reimbursed, and 3 . Certifies that the project is compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; and 4 . Appoints the General Manager as agent of the District to con- PP 5 g duct all negotiations , execute and submit all documents including but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments , billing statements , and so on which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. 6y t/rr�/ ��'C�,l•�1i\.•�..`�,�\1 \1'�e�vaA���,3�i�`��,' (�(�'� .� .n � _._ i, .. ....... -. ...4... . ....'._ra.. . ,a`�,__/- -�J�\\ %y _� \ �•e' CvrL CREEK OPEN SPACE PRESERVE Q anco�: RUSSIAN RIDGE OPEN SPACE PRESERVE { nil, 'Cif f' 01 \� :`.�� ..• !"�,� `� SCALE 1 - 20001 ANORTH �� 'yam+��'� �ti•.;" !����`�� �,'Jjll,'�•i�� �_ �t"'�� �. ��```T� y'�,G-`'� - �. Imo/% �v,� J ,t�.�- /1��. �/�p ; � ,\ \ 1 1 � +����`Ul�i � f ^ZL_ k_.' ��11U11!L=�✓- �; EXHIBIT A 14 .; {Y ��' ��,\'~ _ �cr� �Y�+✓!Y en torn` � ��� �`�.,����,��tea''/ �t (�,�--� �� ��� �� Projects F ` \�,\\ � t�\,,� 600 .•�,_..'.., ::.'•:':"` siteGate 1f .., ' �� .�� � .'F. \ S'3&a �`''. �' �( ,\� ?tom.r,.,..y,..,,•tt.,�' Y,Trsaks .�`'� � '` r FBI _ �' � �� �,1\`-• �o �\^ t1.�4'.'��µ�� -� (� ff Coal Creek Open Space_Pres77� ire Road Los Trancos m >�4'•, . �� "� Open Space Preserve CalTrans - a V1St3_Point 3.1 M. Al `i•Y �,� � ► �;_ m, .: 3" Monte Bello • ./.•bn Space Fireserve Russian Ridge :,x, :: ace Preserve "`�f..Y 4�S'...•.{ } ^1. ..�v+. ��- - In f ` _ ♦, � 3.v .'. \ Y / t ;� ',, - 'F. '1 _ / .� 1 ✓-'� - "\� � y I� •} ,rC � J..c ,•�si�•`,� J> ,t.�a%w,� _.� r� l(fif. ;�`"�,,�}, r�`..� ��1\ (\�_✓r//J (`)/\�\i�l `iI� � � '�� ������1\ � M4h J� .T` �j�� �i^' \�:�':••;''." ..���.4M}'•• 9 0 op 44 .' Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve I ` 8 _ ♦ ��' a t�� � ill l54/ ooi�i���< Los�ranc.p: 'oo L bject Property t> . . t ';g►, Coal Creek Open Space Preserve - ',,/K Los Trancos ` Alpine Road c; r. tV,' Open Space PreserV: f {` C--Trans Vista Point Mon t c 13 r 11 o �\� a 1 N` l� Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve- a . Skyll ine Ridge 1 Open Space Preserve 00 Item 4B Site hlap )'w (� _ i{ , Proposed Addition to the ��� \ ( ;• r ���� r' f?) / Coal Creek Open Space Preserve v161 Scale I" = 2000` North _^tom;. +" -_�,. •��D!U1_1L1% O,C-: �__-_.1/,;�J�u.�u;�IaOr�w,_�V<.-�!&fr��- _ —Zl''���'-�.�=-�� 1 _� `'�. R-86-10 (Meeting 86-03 January 22 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT January 15 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: C. Britton, Land Acquisition Manager; D. Hansen , Land Manager; A. Cummings , Environmental Analyst SUBJECT: Land and Water Conservation Fund Application for Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve Development Project Introduction: As outlined in report R-86-09 , dated January 15 , 1986 , the Land and Water Conservation Fund Program (LWCF) , as administered by the California State Department of Parks and Recreation, has been a major source of supplemental funding for local park agencies. The agencies ' share of the funds is allocated to each of the State 's ten planning dis- tricts primarily on the basis of population. The types of local projects funded are the acquisition or development of neighborhood, community, and regional parks. This submittal is the second of two grant applications for the 1986-1987 Land and Water Conservation Fund program. The site development application described in this report requests $196 ,250 for the Skyline Ridge Public Access Project, representing one-half of the $392 ,500 total project cost. This is the same project previously described to you (see report R-85-50 dated September 18 , 1985) when it was submitted for the Proposition 18 park facilities grant program. Recipients of these grants have not yet been announced. Since the development of access to this Preserve is the highest priority in the District 's Relative Site Emphasis Plan, staff recommends applying under both programs to increase the probability of funding this year. The following is a short summary of the project. For a detailed descrip- tion see report R-85-50 . Project Description: This grant proposal seeks funds to help implement Phase I of the Development Plan for Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. The main thrust of the project is to provide public access to the Pre- serve. Providing this access is key to all other development items and will encourage public involvement in subsequent aspects of the develop- ment. While basic parking areas are the minimum needed to facilitate public access , a variety of other developments are proposed to enable visitors to experience various parts of the Preserve and to make their stay at the Preserve an enjoyable, rewarding, and memorable one. The following facilities are proposed for grant funding (refer to at- tached map for location) : 1. A new main road entrance off Skyline Boulevard in the Christmas tree farm area, leading to a 25 car parking area. -oad qu9uidOT-aA9G 9AJaSGJd aopdS uado 9bPTU 9UTTANS 9q4 aOg spuna UOTqPA --T9SUOn aeqPM PUP PUPq JOJ UOTqPDTTddV aqq bUTAoaddV 40TJ4STU aopdS uado TPUOT59H PTnsUTuadPTW Gq4 JO SJOqDaaTG JO PJP09 Gqq JO UOTqnTOSaH paqop-4-.P .6UTmOTTO3 aqq qdopp noA qpqq puaunuooaj I UOTqPPU9UM1009U - spaip BuTNjpd aqq apau sGTqpq OTUOTd pup 'TTpal dooq allTdTV 9qq JO UOTqjod P 'p9JP BUTNapd qoupi aqq qv, ApTdsTp upTd aa4spw p JJTOAJaS9U 9UTdTv qP ainqonaqs UOTqPAJ9sqo mau P go UoTqonj4suoo punj PTnom qsnal aopdS uado PTnSUTUGd -aoanos jaqpm AOU9baGUIa UP JOJ SaTOAJ9SGa Gqq 04 ssaoop Noniq GJTJ go quauidOT9A9p PUP 1ppd aaqdooTT9q P go uoTqonaqsuoo 'PaPAeTnog auTTANS uIOJJ PGaP bUTNjpd GuTTANS aqq UqajOs 04 STPTJaqPUI BUTdPoSPUPT 'JTOAJ9S9U 9UTdTV aOJ uPTd .4uaui9bvuPUI 4P4TqPq P go 4U;qiudOT9A9P ; sqTtujad Aaps' s909u 9qq TTP buTuTpqqo IsuiaqsAs oTqdas pup 'JaqPM 'SPPOa 'bUTXjpd aqq joj S9Tpn4S bUTJaaUTBUq aqq aoj ;DlqTsuodsai aq PTnom qoTaqsTG aqj 'I GsPqd 90 s4uaulaTG l9q4O bUTPUnj UT aqviad000 pTnom qsnal aopds uado PTnsuTuad pup q3TJ4STG 9qj 'UOTqoaqojd 94Ts 90UPqU9 PUP 9AJ9S9Jd Gq4 90 A4T -TTqTSTA aqq aSPaJOUT 04 S9qPb PUP bUTOUGJ 'bUTUbTS JO UOT4PTTP4suI '13 -spaip buTXjpd qP sauoqd Aouabiatua JO UOT4PTTP4suI -L -SJTPqOT99qm uT 9SOL14 04 9TqTs -S900P 9UIOS 6UTpnIOUT SPaJP bUTXjpd ipau suioojqsaj JO UOT4PTTP4suI .9 -SbUT4UPTd UPTapdTJ q4Tm JTOAJOSG-d 9OqS -aSJOH JO S@bPUTPJP 9qPTp9UIWT 9q'4 JO UOT4p4TTTqPqaj pup quatuaoupqua - S -qDuPJ Gq4 04 suOT400uuOD q4Tm 'JTOAaaS9H @UTdTV punoxe ,TT-eil doori allTdTv,, ss;930-e GTO19m P JO UOT-4onjqsuoo -Aippunoq GAJ9SGJd aqq off. Paap buTNapd allTTANS s T aq4 ulOag ATaaqqnos BuTPP9T TTPa4 buTPTJ/bUTNTq P PUP PaaP bu.5[apd qDUPJ PUP 9UTTANS aqq BuTqoauuoo uo-r-4oas ppo-T ,;asod:rnd-T-4Tnui,, p BUTpnTOUT '9AJ9Sajcl aiq-4 Llf)no-TLI-4 ,-[Tpjj allTTANS., aqq go uoTqonjqsuoo •c *,e;a-Tp qDuPJ 9qq uT saPO OT joj buTXapd pup aATap aDUPJ4U@ PGAojdtUT UV -Z OM,L aj6pd OT-98-H RESOLUTION NO. 86-3 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUNDS FOR THE SKYLINE RIDGE OPEN SPACE PRESERVE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the Congress under Public Law 88-578 has authorized the establishment of a Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant-In-Aid Program, providing matching funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for acquiring lands and developing facilities for public outdoor recreation purposes; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation is responsible for the administration of the program within the State, setting up neces- sary rules and procedures governing application by local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said adopted procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of applications and the availability of local matching funds prior to submission of said applications to the State; and WHEREAS, the proposed Skyline Ridge Open Space Development Project is consistent with the Statewide Comprehensive Recreation Resources Plan: Recreation in California, Issues and Actions : 1981-1985; and WHEREAS, the project must be compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the District hereby: 1. Approves the filing of an application for Land and Water Conservation Fund assistance; and 2 . Certifies that said agency has matching funds from property tax revenue and can finance 100 percent of the project, half of which will be reimbursed, and 3 . Certifies that the project is compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; and 4 . Appoints the General Manager as agent of the District to conduct all negotiations , execute and submit all documents including but not limited to applications , agreements , amendments, billing statements , and so on which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. Hostel/Organization 1: Headquarters (alternate) SKYLINE RIDGE OPEN SPACE PRESERVE Alpine Loop Trail (12 MASTER PLAN +Matter Plan Ui5plav 2 (1)_ Ranger Residence exis tin Parkin 10 s aces 1 Mldpeninsula Regional Open Space District I 1 ti(1) + Restrooms 1 1 t 1,� Vista Loop Trai kyline Irail/Road 1 Development Plan It l t Restrooms 1 ■ Parkin 25 s aces 1 Phase 1 i - 1 \ \f[ `,\t Ranch Area /� 1 •:1 <� :� � 1 (1 Reve etation 1 ``v 1 y �' ) Emergent Helico ter Lan in Area 3 Legend 9 j � n Par in 20 trailer s aces L 1 1 1 1 C \ ._.. S line Trail 1 2 wnnl.-e«...T,.e Hlking.nd Eq...1,1-Tr•C Hiking TWI Old Page Mill Road lo.<Ltu.•.1.. slsn.o1 i vlalo,cena<r rotor control au• - Astronomy Observation Area w.t.,supply Point + Not Originally in Phase 1 i` J J -. �. +��`� �_�. �h `. �� ^✓ !�. � + ✓ _ \. .{ ✓I r /� (1) Proposed Grant Project C L �j11. It t' l (2) P.O.S.T. Project �lJ.. ) ( --r i i► r� , + 1 \ i.. \ / (3) M.R.O.S.D. Project V�, ,�� s•� ytlar� ,Open$paC Pre�erveBoertuary 4— 2M Associates nc EDAW l . FrWn Eder a Cem7s Harvey d Stanley Assoclates R-86-01 (Meeting 86-03 January 22 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT December 18, 1985 TO: Board of Dire ctors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager PREPARED BY: E. Johnson, Secretary to the General Manager SUBJECT: Appointment of Board Committees Introduction: Your Rules of Procedure call for appointment of members of the Budget and Legislative Committees at the first Regular Meeting following the election of officers . The Rules also name the Treasurer as a member of the Budget Committee. The appointments to standing committees in the past have led to dis- cussion of membership and assignments of ad hoc committees. This report gives information on the status of current committees for your consideration of committee assignments for 1986 . The Presiding Officer makes committee assignments with the consent of the Board. Standing Committees : The 1985 membership of the standing committees is noted below along with comments: Budget Committee K. Duffy (Treasurer) E. Shelley T. Henshaw This Committee met frequently in the spring to consider the formulation of the 1985-86 budget, including the Open Space Management Budget. Upon completion of the Land Management Staffing Study, the Committee will evaluate and make recommendations on possible changes in the Land Manage- ment budget guidelines and possibly make recommendations on a revised budget. Legislative Committee R. Bishop D. Wendin N. Hanko The purpose and functions of this Committee are set forth in detail in the "Policy on Legislative Committee" , adopted on August 10 , 1977 and in "Policies for Handling Legislative Matters" , adopted on July 25 , 1979 . Current Ad Hoc Committees : The 1985 membership of ad hoc committees is noted below: Dog Committee (established May 10, 1978) Ti. Bishop N. Hanko K. Duffy Long Ridge Open Space Preserve was added as a fourth site to the I R-86-01 Page two Experimental Dog Program. The Committee is charged with evaluating the program in June or July and giving its recommendations to the Board as to the permanency of the program. Office Space Committee (established January 28 , 1981) E. Shelley D. Wendin K. Duffy The Committee monitored progress of staff' s office space search and helped to formulate recommendations to the Board. The Committee met in a noticed public meeting on September 25 to tour four potential sites and made its recommendation to you to authorize staff to enter into lease or lease-option negotiations for short-term office space with agents of the Old Mill Office Center and Los Altos Office Center sites and to continue to pursue longer term office space locations, including the City of Mountain View site. When the Old Mill site was chosen, you charged the Committee with reviewing office space plans , using its discretion as to what should be discussed by the full Board. Public Transporation Committee (established April 14 , 1982) N. Hanko T. Henshaw This Committee was formed to determine how to approach the matter of public transportation to park and open space areas and was directed to return to you with a plan of action. As I have received relevant infor- mation, I have passed it on to the Committee members. Picchetti Winery Restoration Review Committee (established October 27 , 1982) K. Duffy isthe Board's appointee to the Committee, which met in September to review the status of the lease and schedule of improvements. The Committee should continue in existence until all restoration is complete. Thornewood Restoration Review Committee (established November 10, 1982) H. Turner serves as the Board appointee to this Committee which met in October to review the status of the lease and schedule of improvements . This Committee should continue in existence until all improvements are completed. Santa Clara County Parks Liaison Committee (established November 28, 1984) K. Duffy T. Henshaw Members of this Committee were appointed to share liaison duties with the Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Commission. A specific assignment from the Board is to meet with Commissioners to explore the feasibility of a stable on Rancho San Antonio County Park. Eminent Domain Policy Committee (established April 10 , 1985) N. Hanko R. Bishop D. Wendin (replaced H. Turner) You charged the Committee on April 10 with drafting for Board considera- tion a range of alternatives for a proposed policy change in the use of eminent domain. On May 8 you further directed the Committee to draft a range of possible procedures covering the implementation of the Brown Act, annexation of lands to the District, and acquisition of land outside the District. On May 22 the Committee presented a list of possible R-86-01 Page three policies for full Board consideration on the use of eminent domain. on June 5 the Committee presented its second report with policy alternatives regarding the Brown Act, acquisition outside District boundaries, and annexation. At the public hearing on June 12 you directed the Committee to formulate consensus statements based on the evening' s discussions for your consideration but not adoption. On June 26 the Committee submitted to you "language which consolidates. . . policies" and noted it had "completed its charge" . It was at that meeting you took a straw vote on the main issue of the eminent domain considera- tion. Based on comments and votes, you asked the Committee to refine alternatives for the Brown Act implementation policy and eminent domain policies . On July 10 the Committee submitted for your discussion two options each for eminent domain and Brown Act implementation policies. At your August 14 meeting you tentatively adopted portions of Version 1 but asked the Committee to work on a definition of "improved" and the question of subdividable, unimproved properties. Each Director filled out an Eminent Domain Use Questionnaire and returned it to the Committee which subsequently tallied the results. On October 23 you charged the Committee with reviewing those results and, where a clear position existed, to return with recommendations as to what further studies were needed. The Committee noted in its report to you (R-85-55 dated December 2 , 1985) that work had been completed on its initial draft of the Eminent Domain portion of the Land Acquisition Policies (Version 7) , and you scheduled a Special Meeting for January 15 , for public discussion and probable tentative adoption of that portion of the Policies . The Committee noted it still had work to complete on the Brown Act, acquisition of land outside District boundaries and annexation, and the Board directed the Committee to proceed on those policies . Board Appointee Review Committee (established September 25 , 1985) K. Duffy E. Shelley T. Henshaw The Board's charge to this Committee was to evaluate optional compensa- tion packages for Board appointees and decide upon and get comparable compensation information. The Committee is scheduled to report back to you at your meeting of January 8 , 1986, Preservation 2020 Task Force On September 25 the Board appointed Director Hanko as its representa- tive on this committee formed by the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors . Recommendation: I recommend that you: 1. appoint theBudget and Legislative Committees for 1986, and 2 . make other committee assignments , adjustments , and appointments you wish. M-86-11 (Meeting 86-03 January 22, 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 15 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager PREPARED BY: J. Fiddes, Administrative Services Manager SUBJECT: Final Adoption of Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual Discussion: At your January 8 Regular Meeting, you tentatively adopted the proposed Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual (see report R-86-05 of January 2, 1986) . You withheld final adoption of the document to your January 22 Regular Meeting in order to allow more time for public review and input. You did take action to make Martin Luther King, Jr. Day an official District holiday in place of Lincoln's birthday holiday. Copies of the document have been available at the main office. To date, staff has not received any input from any member of the public on the content of the proposed Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual. As noted by Director Wendin at the January 8 meeting, staff had reviewed drafts of the proposed manual with you as a personnel matter at three different Closed Sessions. Recommendation: As stated in report R-86-05 , I recommend that you approve the attached Resolution adopting the Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual and that your approval of the Manual be retroactive to January 1, 1986 specifically to allow those Rangers who worked on New Year' s Day to receive time-and-one-half compensation. Please contact the District office if you need another copy of the manual that will be incorporated as a part of the resolution. I RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ADOPTING PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL WHEREAS , the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District seek to insure equal treatment for those indivi- duals who compete for District employment and promotion and seek to define the obligations , rights , privileges , benefits , and prohibitions which are placed upon all employees of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District; and WHEREAS, the attached Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual is provided to maintain uniformity and equity in personnel matters in order to facilitate efficient and economical service to the public; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does adopt the attached Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual, effective January 1 , 1986 , and that said Manual shall supersede the Personnel Policies adopted on September 10 , 1975 exclusive of sections (f) through (j ) relating to the following fringe bene- fits : medical plan, dental plan, life insurance , long-term disability insurance , and accidental death and dismemberment insurance . AI MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMO TO THE FILE January 23, 1986 SUBJECT: Dedication Status of District Lands and Proposed Changes in Procedure January 22, 1986 Regular Meeting Refer to Resolution 86-5 in Resolution File for actual resolution and exhibit adopted by Board ratifying dedication of certain District lands to public open space purposes. Exhibit was amended at meeting to dedicate previously undedicated Limekiln Canyon properties, except for the former Carter property. R-86-08 (Meeting 86-03 January 22 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT January 13 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SULJ. CT: Dedication Status of District Lands and Proposed Change in Procedures Introduction: In accordance with the Board' s adopted Dedicated Lands Policy (see memorandum M-79-146 dated November 21, 1979) , an annual report indicating the status of District lands as dedicated or undedi- cated public open space is to be presented to you in January of each year. The dedication status of District lands was last presented to you at your January 9 , 1985 meeting (see report R-85-02 dated January 4 , 1985) . The Dedicated Lands Policy states : "Normally, undedicated lands within the District's boundaries will be held for future dedication to park or open space purposes , but only after the necessary planning, boundary adjustments, provision for permanent access and other changes in con- figuration, which may involve the disposal or exchange of all or portions of such lands , have been completed. " Throughout the year the individual undedicated parcels are reviewed as part of the use and management planning process , and any change in dedication status has occurred at that time. Table 1 lists pertinent data for the complete inventory of District lands. Table 2 extracts from that list those parcels the District' s interest in which is dedicated. Table 3 lists the undedicated interests in land. Note that the portion of the Limekiln Canyon Area of the Mt. Umunhum Open Space Preserve for which you passed a motion of inten- tion to dedicate (see R-86-06 dated January 2 , 1986) , is shown as undedi- cated and your intention noted. Changes in the Law: Assembly Bill 2253 , sponsored by this District and authored by Assemblyman Sher (see memorandum M-85-17 dated February 5 , 1985) , became law effective January 1, 1986 . This act, among other things, amended Section 5540 of the Public Resources Code to read in part as follows: An easement or other interest in real property may be dedicated for park or open-space purposes, or both, by the adoption of a resolution by the board of directors, and any interest so dedicated may be conveyed only as provided in this section. Previously, it was not explicitly stated that an easement or other less-than-fee interest in real property could be dedicated and that such dedications are to be done by resolution. Historical Review of Board Policy: Your Dedicated Lands Policy makes no mention of the type of interest in real property that may be dedicated. R-86-08 Page two At the times the Policy was adopted and amended, the question of dedication of lesser interests in property was not considered. Nonetheless, some ease- ments have subsequently been dedicated. Most of the undedicated easements appear to be excellent candidates for dedication. Strangely, whereas your policies call for dedication of lands by adopted resolution, the practice has generally been to dedicate by adopted motion. The original Resolution Establishing a Policy for the Dedication of District Lands was adopted on February 14 , 1979 (see memorandum M-79-34 , dated Febru- ary 6 , 1979) . The policy was subsequently amended by resolutions adopted February 28, 1979 , May 16 , 1979 , and November 28 , 1979 . The most recent version is attached. Section 1 of each of these resolutions refers to dedication by resolution and does not mention dedication by motion. Resolution 79-13 , also adopted on February 14 , 1979 , was enacted to dedicate a list of designated parcels and to withhold others from dedi- cation. Resolutions adopted April 11 , 1979 and January 23, 1980 dedicated additional parcels that were not included in February, 1979 . However, the first new parcel to be dedicated was not on the Board' s agenda for an acquisition decision until May 14 , 1980 and was dedicated by motion, as were all subsequent dedicated acquisitions . A search of the reports and minutes did not uncover any record of why the change was made. I have the following two conjectures : either Board and staff members forgot between January and May, 1980 that dedication was supposed to be done by resolution (a difficult theory to accept since these persons had been involved in the new dedication procedures , although there were some changes in staff at that time) ; or the original real intention was only to dedicate the backlog by resolution as a for- mality but to dedicate subsequent properties by motion (also difficult to accept since the policy resolutions made no such distinction) . None- theless , I strongly expect, judging from Legal Counsel ' s attached earlier report on Dedication of Acquired Lands to Park and Open Space Purposes (memorandum M-79-34 dated February 6 , 1979) , that even though technically the Board's own policy may not have been followed, the Board' s intent was clear in the Board' s adopted motions to dedicate , and the parcels dedicated by motion are nevertheless indeed dedicated under common law and the Public Resources Code Section 5540 (as it read prior to January 1 , 1986) . However, as a final clean-up action to erase any doubt as to their intended status , the parcels in question can be dedicated by resolution. Adoption of the attached Resolution Ratifying Dedication 6f Certain Dis- trict Interests in Land would accomplish the clean-up. Proposed Policy Chan : Rather than adopt a resolution in each instance of -acquisition of Change : parcel , I propose that all parcels to be dedicated should ormally be dedicated at the time of the annual review of dedication status. This would accomplish several things : (1) it would give on the average six months more planning time between adoption of the Use and Management Plan and the actual dedication to ensure that rights in the parcel, or in a portion thereof, should be dedicated; (2) it would "collect" the parcels and dedicate them by means of a single document for ease of record keeping; (3) it would give a new and positive meaning to the annual review. The intent to dedicate would be made by adopted motion at the time of the first and second readings of the Interim Use and Management Plan at the time of acquisition and during the regular Use and Management Plan formulations and review. I am also proposing that the annual review of dedication status be don*e a month earlier, starting in 1986 , so that in the case of changes of Directors following elections, the Directors who had been involved in the intent to dedicate could R-86-08 Page three vote on the formal resolution before leaving the Board. Note that the policy should also allow formal dedication at acquisition time to satisfy a condition of the acquistion or strong wish of the seller. At the same time, I am recommending that you amend the dedication policy to make technical changes , as shown in an attachment, suggested by Legal Counsel to correspond to specific language in the Public Resources Code. Summary of Dedication Status : The attached Table 4 summarizes the dedi- cation status of all District lands by preserve. Of the 20 ,699 acre total of interests in land, 15 ,610 acres are dedicated (75%) , and 5089 acres are undedicated (25%) . Most of the undedicated acreage is in the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. Additionally, you have indicated your intention to dedicate 844 acres of interestsin the Limekiln Canyon area, which would increase the dedicated portion to 79%. Other undedicated parcels that are excellent candidates for dedication total about 1500 acres. These include the Edgewood County Park, Los Gatos Creek Park and minor easements , as well as the Coal Creek, Rancho San Antonio, Saratoga Gap, El Sereno, Sierra Azul (Kennedy -Road Area) parcels. The dedication disposition of the remainder of the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve will require further discussion. Although the land could be dedicated except for the right to transfer density credits , as was done for most of the Limekiln Canyon Area, there are so many disconnected sub-areas that future adjoining residential developments could make some of the District holdings disposable for development. Staff could further analyze the general area to determine which District parcels are most assured of becoming usable District unites ; such parcels might then be dedicated. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the following attached resolutions : (1) Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ratifying Dedication of Certain District Lands to Public Open Space Purposes In order to gather all previous dedications into one listing, the parcels already dedicated by resolution are included. (2) Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Reqional Open Space District Adopting an Amended Policy for the Dedication of District Lands Table 1. LAND INVENTORY- ALL PARCELS Run date: 13-Jan-86 File name: LANDS Dedicated Board Fee or by Motion Area Approval Closing Dedication Easement or Res. No.Planning Area Preserve Subarea Grantor Date Date Date Acreage or Lease or Unded. Reason for Withholding and Notes I Hassler Edgewood County Park County of San Mateo 23-Jul-80 10-Oct-80 468 E U Recreation and park easement not reviewed I Hassler Hassler County of San Francisco 11-May-83 10-Jurr83 11-May-83 293 F M 2 W. of Skyline North E1 Corte Madera Creek Alan Hosking Ranch 15-Aug-85 05-Sep-85 25-Sep-85 595 F M 2 W. of Skyline North La Honda Creek Collett 25-Apr-84 30-Apr-84 255 F U isolated site 2 W. of Skyline North La Honda Creek Darling 15-Jul-85 16-Aug-85 69 F U Isolated site 2 W. of Skyline North La Honda Creek Peninsula Open Space Trust 28-Aug-85 13-Sep-85 5 F U Encroachment problem; former Weber parcel 2 W. of Skyline North Purisima Creek Redwoods Wilkins 28-Jul-82 06-Aug-82 11-Aug-82 570 F M includes formerly undedicated easement 2 W. of Skyline North Purisima Creek Redwoods Rancho Canada de Verde 10-Nov-82 18-Nov-82 08-Dec-82 174 F M 2 W. of Skyline North Purisima Creek Redwoods Rancho Canada de Verde 16-Feb-83 21-Mar-83 09-Mar-83 100 F M 2 W. of Skyline North Purisima Creek Redwoods Rancho Canada de Verde 25-May-83 26-May-83 08-Jun-83 3 F M 2 W. of Skyline North Purisima Creek Redwoods Wilkins 18-Apr-84 20-Apr-84 23-May-84 1662 F M 3 Portola Valley Coal Creek Fine 09-Apr-80 05-May-80 15-May-81 23 F M 3 Portola Valley Coal Creek Rose 23-Jun-82 01-Jul-82 14-Jul-82 56 F M 3 Portola Valley Coal Creek Allen 23-Jun-62 01-Jul-82 102 F U Possible boundary adjustment or sale 3 Portola Valley Coal Creek Liner 23-Jun-82 01-Jul-82 14-Jul-82 40 F M 3 Portola Valley Coal Creek Vista Point Estates 11-May-83 01-Jun-83 127 F U Possible boundary adjustment or sale 3 Portola Valley Coal Creek Stallings 14-Sep-83 19-Oct-83 09-Nov-83 13 F M 3 Portola Valley Coal Creek Hybl 19-Dec-84 18-Jan-85 13-Feb-85 15 F M 3 Portola Valley Coal Creek Peninsula Open Space Trust 28-Aug-85 13-Sep-85 23-Oct-85 11 F M Former Fernandez parcel 3 Portola Valley Los Trances Dahl 24-Nov-76 10-Dec-76 11-Apr-79 274 F R 3 Portola Valley Thornewood Sierra Club Foundation 13-Sep-78 31-Oct-78 14-Feb-79 87 F R Portion leased out; portion in life estate 3 Portola Valley Thornewood Oswald 09-Jul-80 28-Jan-81 4 E U Trail easement not reviewed 3 Portola Valley Tharrewood Gano 14-Oct-81 22-Nov-82 14 F U Possible sale 3 Portola Valley Windy Hill Peninsula Open Space Trust 30-Dec-80 29-Jan-81 30-Dec-80 537 F M Former Corte Madera Associates parcel 3 Portola Valley Windy Hill Catalano 16-Dec-81 14-Jan-82 108 F U Possible trade of a portion 3 Portola Valley Windy Hill Anderson 10-Mar-82 13-Apr-M 10-Mar-82 6 F M 3 Portola Valley Windy Hill Bachtold 28-Mar-84 30-Mar-84 09-4ay-84 27 F M 3 Portola Valley Windy Hill Bowers 22-Aug-84 21-Sep-84 10-Oct-84 I F M 3 Portola Valley Windy Hill Peninsula Open Space Trust 14-Nov-84 15-Nov-84 28-Nov-84 1 F M Former PG&E parcel 3 Portola Valley Windy Hill Fiore 24-0ct-84 27-Nov-84 12-Dec-84 19 F M 3 Portola Valley Windy Hill Martin 19-Dec-84 28-Dec-84 23-Jan-85 3 F M 3 Portola Valley Windy Hill Corte Madera Associates 10-Apr-85 23-Apr-85 1 E U Recorded instrument allows for relocation 4 Rancho San Antonio Foothills Blair 12-Jun-74 31-Jul-74 14-Feb-79 90 F R 4 Rancho San Antonio Foothills Crocker 28-May-75 16-Jurr75 14-Feb-79 70 F R Page 1-1 +`•' is �.ti r ., .. �i:� , - .a j', - .. , 4 Rancho Seen Antonio Foothills y-77 77 14 79 10 F R 4 Rancho San Antonio Foothills Struggle Nourtain 13-J 79 15-Jut-74 10 F U Possible sale or trade; isolated parcel 4 PAncho San Antonio Foothills Giuffre 27-J 034 27-JaHI2 I F M 4 San Antonio Rotho San Antonio 75 12-Jinn-75 14-Fet-79 394 F R 4 Rancho Stet Antonio Rancho San Antonio Archdiocese of San Francisco 13-Jul 77 11-M-77 80 F U Possible trade; part of 199 w. purchase 4 Rancho Sot Antonio Rucho San Antonio Archdiocese, of San Francisco 13-Jul 77 il-Oct-77 iMF -79 119 F R Part of 199 at. purchase 4 1hocho San Antonio Rotho Sawn Antonio Cho 14-01ar-84 06 375 F N 4 Rancho Sant Antonio Rancho San Antonio Close 14 li M-loco-85 P F M 4 Rancho So Antonio flancho, San Antonio Windmill Pasture Duvamck 1 77 77 1 E U Road and trail easement subject to relocation 4 Rancho San Antonio Antho Sawn Antonio Wind ill Pasture Dvveneck 14-Dec-77 77 1 fig 430 F R 4 Rancho San Antonio Rancho San Antonio Windmill Pasture Petersen1 -80 18 1ce-Nov-80 80 F M 4 Rancho San Antonio Rancho go Antonio Windmill Pasture Winship -3an-81 27 WJmril 251 F N Subject to losses; another 29 ac. in Noate B. 4 Rancho Son Antonio Rwxho Son Antonio Windmill Pasture Hidden Villa 13-Oct-B2 03 240 E M upon space easement 4 Rancho Bo Antonio Rancho Sot Antonio Windmill Pasture Trust for Hidden Villa 22-Nov-83 07 398 E M Open space easement 5 Monte Bello Monte Deno NcCone 24-Jarr79 26-Feb-79 40 F U Possible transfer to Santa Clara County Parks 5 Monte Bello Nonto Bello Melton r-W 07-Ma 18 F U Isolated site; no public access 5 Nonte Bello Bello Collins 09 07 -8Q 8 F U Isolated site; no public access 5 Vaie Bello Monte Bello pap Mill Sued Avi 27-41ov-74 18-Bec-74 14-Fib-79 760 F R Partial interest with Li0a in 760 ac. 5 Monte Bello Nonto Bello Pop Mill Road Ligda 07-Feb- It-Feb-75 14 Feb-79 0 F R Partial into-at with Avidano in 760 ac. 5 Monte Bello Monte Bello Pap Mill now Burn 22-Mav-77 77 14Feb-79 610 F R 5 Norte Bello Ntote Bello Pap MiII Road Eldridge 13-Apr-77 07-Dec-77 14-Feb-79 150 F R Nodification of agreement approved 10-M-77 5 Norte Bello Nonto Bello Pop Mill Road own 26-Jul-78 78 1 79 13 F R 5 Nonte Bello Nonto Bello Pap MillStanford University 22-Feb-78 78 14-Feb-79 694 F R Modification of agreement approved 27 78 5 Bello Monte Bello Pap Mill Road Investment Corp. of Philadel. 24-Janr79 79 14-Feb-79 100 F R Subject to tree fame lam 5 Monte Bello Monte Bello Pap Mill Road SMOMM 26 31 11 F M 5 Nonte Bello Vionto 2e110 Pap Mill fted Naridon 25-J 30-Juffirso 25-1 169 F M 15l16 interest in 169 arm 5 Monte hello Mote Bello Page Mill Road Winship 28-J 1 27 i Wilarfit 29 F M Sher portion in Rancho Son Antonio (i.S.P. 5 Vionto Bello Norte Bello Pap Mii1 Road Mdi£e1 81 21- 97 F M San Mateo Co. portion closed escrow 204an-82 5 Monte Bello Mate Bello Picdwtti Ranch Picchetti 14-Jul76 1 76 14-Feb-79 200 F R Subject to historic reinery lease 5 Monte Bello Monte Bello Picchetti Ranch consigny 14-" Wk&80 1441ay-ft 107 F N 5 Nome Bello Saratoga Sap Ch gh -74 -74 14-Feb-79 136 F R 5 01onte Bello Salratoll 80 Boy Scouts of America y-76 15-Jurr76 14-Feb-79 1 F R Nistakenly withheld from dedication 23-J 5 Monte Bello Saratoga Bap Buffietti 1 76 1 76 80 F U Transferred from holding armament 15-Jul-85 5 Ounte Bello Saratolo Bap Bonetti 1 76 1 76 14-Feb-79 M F R !cart of 355 ac purchase 5 Monte Bello orga Bap label - -9 106 F U Isolated site 5 Monto Bello SAP, DOPOW 1 b 83 11-Ber-63 10 F U Isolated site 6 W. of Skyline South Long Ridge Ridge Randy 78 78 14-Fab-79 386 F R 4 ac. of original 390 ac. traded to Bodhi 6 W. of Skyline South Lung Ridge Bri 79 04- g-82' 54 F M 6 W. of Skyline South Long Ridge Smith J 1 04 1 284 i 15 F M 6 W. of Skyline South Long Ridge BM 244 28-Jul-81 14 F U Possible trade of partial interest i ) 6 W. of Skyline South Long Ridge 11 1 -8F 20 F M 6 W. of Skyline South Long Ridge Bodhi 11 1 p-62 0-* 31 F M Part of exchange transaction Page 1-2 t: •� � aNp kr � �u ii! Z' 1r Y f. •h ��ss t'- Y 1 � f i JA .{1 .0 j ,•;I :.1 j �.. . •► ,..tl l./ AJ .! -.J a .:I ,•J iry In b ,p R 41 1 , 4.r i q+ ^ !! fli i ••7f 1 t7s T� 1 �� cJC+ 1., r'i Y t�y LIN OC• ,•i�'1 a! �'1 1 -4+�1,� [r .'.�.11 7.t 'T t'f....r�? :•al,� 'i 47 r7 ;•+e Glly ��y' ,' !1 -;1 '9 •- lea w ,.� ..- - 'b' L` l? !if '1 N i zoto z x � In `� - �• '1' r•- to - ' w ! # , r m na y�r p:',, � • t a !-• ter,n.. •-w �-. / H') v T. S 16 qya •.n uttr s .rt lcs � ' tom+ w ��� '• R t! « � ae 4 r µ ''{ �[, �. 'i �', �, `-, �a :s ++ •. - N . •... a•. . Mq 1�r ! •1 � •y��`' M '� R1:.' 1 �•y1y. y. X `p 1`... �Mf-. [[�� •ti [W�1 j} l fj� �' � #. � iL ,J 1•: .2 i�1.i �- •i. i � i A �• 7J �,,jp. l CP a �'1 ftY .G r- r rY i.�'t � 1'4 �< 'Y Cy t'. ;} -d f' to .4 tit 11• ;a f" .r At W AD -[F16 a, 1, W 0 71 1 +�'.._ 'L J Yff '9r 1 �•! :v f,'• t. C C• 'V 'a V [{1 rr I { I v,. - .p n m a '- n. v n '4 w m P Gi-__._ •�—n—r r."._�� "�.-._6�____._ -__- •_ m N n w O 6 it. of Skyline South Laq Ridgy Bodhi 11 1 -82 5 F M=.. Former NDnWw parcel 6 V. of Skyline South Log Ridge DAi it mopv 13 E U Coo sf6 am. not rev.; includes 4 ac. 6 W. of line South Ridge ough 07 25-J 80 F N Sky dge 6 % of Skyline South Long Ridge * 07 -83 25-J 182 E M OW space and public access easement 6 W of Skyline South Russian Ridge Crist i 78 29-Dec-78 14-Feb-78 13 F R SwAa Clara County portion 6 W. of Skyline SoRM Russian Ridge Crist 1 78 17- 14-Feb-79 117 F R So Yatoo City portion 6 V. of Skyline South Russian Ridge Coplon It-Fob-61 19-lta l 114e6r81 88 F N 6 W of Skyline South Russian Ridge Crime -8i 09- 1 12-J 120 F M 6& of Skyline South Russian Ridge Crist 1 °81 30- 1 12-J 40 F N 6 IL of Skyline South Russian Rites Crist 12- 16-Feb-83 16 F 102 F M 6 IL of Skyline South Russian Ridge Nolte 134 O -0 160 F N 6 % of Skyline South Russian Ridge Nt. Melville Williams 26 r-80 22-Oct-w 33 F N 6 H. of Skyline South Russian Ridge Mt. Melville -80 i -W 12 F N 6 W of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Skyline Rench 27-J 014 10f Be F N Subj. to tree fame and family compow4 1 6 N. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge lmwpi 224wv4316441-63 06-Jul-83 47 F N 6 IL of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Quires 224 07 r-64 80 F N 6 IL of Skyline South Skyline Ridge JwAiM 23 01-J 1 54 F N Purchased in conjwiction with 13 ac. easement 6 S. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Jenkins 84 01-Jun-84 134Nar 13 E N Open sp. and trail ease. with 84 arc. fee 6 N. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Peninsula Open Space Trust 23 15-J 13-tr-45 % F M Former Daniel parcel 6 IL of Skyline South Skyline Ridge smaw y-84 31- 1 39 E N Open space and trail easement 6 kt of Skyline South Skyline Rime y-e4 31-J 13 29 E N Open space Nd trail easement 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Lyddon 14-Mmy-78 24 75 14-Fetv-79 266 F R Subject to historic toes law 7 Fromcot Older Fremont Older fladin 75 75 23- 36 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Cocciardi r-76 76 14-feb-79 S F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older to 09-Jw76 24-Jun-I6 14-Feb49 6 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older County of Santa Clara 23-J 76 77 23-J 3 F R Sax sale and gift by Claitor 7 FruwA Older Fremont OlderFab-77 1 77 14-Feb-79 20 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older No¢xetti -Feb-77 11 77 14-Feb-79 216 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremoot Older Nellis 13-Apr-77 06rJ'tet-77 14- eb-79 64 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Barrod 25-J 60 25-Jwr.80 118 F M 7 F Older Fremont Older Brooks 10-Jot-85 18-Jul 4 E U Easseeest not reviewed 8 El arreno Briggs Creak WAY of a Clars to-Jon-Al 07- i F U Isolated site; possible trade; tax sale 8 El swim Castanown Way Saratoga Unified School Dist. 1 78 75 14-Feb-79 2 F R 8 El see Costanoon Way Nodd 10-Nov-9 13-Jwr#3 i E U Trail easoment not roviamed 8 El Sereflo El go No" i 75 03-Nov-75 14-Fab--79 985 F R Part of 1001 ac. purchase 8 El Soreno El 1 75 -75 16 F U Isolated site; part of 1001 ac. purchase 8 El Someno El SoronD Lovell 09 35 F U Isolated site 8 El Strew El Daley i i F u Possible sale or trade 8 E1 Sersno El Sww Atwood i 31 30 F U Possible sale or trade 9 Sierra Aaul Los altos OVA Society of Province of Jun 12 1 -64 14-lido 84 170 F N Part of 964 ac. transaction 9 Sierra Axel Los Gatossociety of Province of Jesw 12-Sep-84 19-Oct-84 % E U Open sp. oase. not rovismedl pit of 264 ac. 9 Sierra A:ul Sierra Anil La Point 30-Jvr75 30-J -75 20 E U Easomwit net reviewed; isolated site page 13 s II�a i I tag IV! --cam;--- - - :"Im s ns;;-. estar -r.sr,,r tv,.cat."IC4 164M itr 3 104-Ni-W. j)tt,j tt,- 'j P-1 opf", DA N C., bk" VWX 1" f' ! 1v+' _ a 196C J c"d SC' ':..4ri- + a-+3��•8t i�-{X4-.;�t t-Ma�•- t .t sc.� �ur. W, !Uw, j O.tiiJ j ;3,-lJb1 (�"i tt :c fe . Ci J!t;{sct 7 r f ro -� ': t 1 t�.�'•+�'' w.; ~ wo'xR 1(^G^ ti f r -{ I .�•.,�' t 4 f ."ty o... -1i.1.'r :f tal ` Q i t9i.a►c `.i�j9i3+:Y;r fy? �i�i 10'' ' :S r f S7': 49 ?lrt i Aunt:V5u DIRT _ =' a{ 7' 1 ►fi u1 1"1-•62 i - ir1-12 d %Y; ,.w*w 221 _'.moo.: '*. �klrurl %.9 c 14 €, ►b'ia►' Sit-" ,gig td.. �� t ��►•irOl+A' lX1�1�'N :. �,' t?J�+' �t;*71 SQ'.AGi.-•�„C ',�-�'-.tc^ "{-'`y���{ � _ � L* �l1Git .+sncau� 01 � r)Wy+�+ 'f- 52 5�- -5� �t-�5v-_. .T� y x;;;1f s•_ v+.. . t� Sir �1;?-W- ���a..��,+ �.,-t1's--t2 �,6 � rP1 J' + i3)?f'js1 a^f D'Rb 11.i 2 43^ � 1-W-1, Cam` _ � aLt;YE� � +• ty,.'fit a1' *'sr+iy 'True �Jy�s �wrua ,3iN�'' 8! 41-1+ as °',8� �; ,, f :t►�JI'�: ;,:. r ,; .0. +y CaQ i4 V.! v ?s. s"iF � F *.;ti' k$ - ;� jt?2�Iia' �!`s'}6 ?!• �`r,q����' >��� :tiYi"a{..�' :(t•Kt"`{-� ^>7��•-'�# tf c , > - +rr=-Hf*av _ ass _ _ - + 43-ok. 31 %J tit>-62 A-Mi4-w I11^ t .r :��i, �:,ar• �jiz.a l � C •�" = r:,'1'Si i, 3F{2f7 13�'t ` ;$� �" "Q� 3hb•:ist-$I. I'~1� y ,, .. . at �+�.,.; srtx{u �:.�r��• �zr� �:vbT+�u «'-,aD-+?i t�--�4�•-fit 1r-�+►1'-1i �'� r N � �. �3QL'i ^Lift ^ ,-. d..•3 _r.. i s W-A S 4* ]8 rr ; C, y i on:� a b- F IP W o0 =-0 3-t 1-5¢ PS '�L'y b;+r+i g snag .0 .� t — ..f� D:,,r �iF aq; 115 <d -S 13 Lr brw c• > .sit s: p uE. bowl - 9 Sierra Axu1 Sierra Azu1 Moody AW Moody Trails 79 1 -Nmy-79 2% F U Possible transfir of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Axut Moody Road Bell 09-Je2-88 88441- ! 83 F U Possible trade of density edits 9 Sierra Ant Sierra Azul Moody Rand Liebelt wivi-a 72 F U Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Azul Moody bad PN i Anwiatn 17 14 21 F N 9 Sierra Ant Sierra Axul Moody PAW orounith 14-No-44 -St 3 F U Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Azul Limekiln Canyon Nindliag J 1 21 F U Intention to dedicate 9 Sierra Axul Sierra Azul Limekiln Canyon Daffy i -#O 17 30 E U Intention todedicate; part of Swahan adoW 9 Sierra Axel Sierra 0261 Lim kiIn Canyon Goodalope,Rubbish 1 14-Jarrft 338 F U Intention to dedicate 9 Sierra AZQI Sierra AZGI Limekiln Canyon Risley i 1 y-81 M F U Intention to dedicate 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Azul Linkiln Canyon Sorahan 27 31 1 37 F U Intention to dedicate; part of Duffy exdwo 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Azul Limekiln CaVon Robin 06 07-F 33 F U Intention to dedicate 9 Sierra 41u1 Sierra Azul LimakiIn Qwqm Corter 09AW-84 11 J 10 F U Possible trade of densityl isolated site 9 Siam Azul Sierra Put Nt. 1101010100 Laye 13-Jun-79 14- 79 137 F U Possible, trade ofdensity; 1/3 int. in 137 ac 9 Sierra Saul Sierra Axul Nt. ue Lap 1 79 1 79 0 F U Possible trade of density; 1/6 int. in 137 ae 9 Sierra Ant Sierra Aral 4. L10vahum Fairweather 14-Ow-79 04-J 186 F U Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Axu2 Nt. ftwive Diaterich Trust 84-Nov-80 10 24-#bv-80 148 F N 9 Sierra A ml Sierra Aral Nt. 1 -83 62 F U Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Arai Nt. L11401hum Srislds 1 83 13-11a 120 F U Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Axel Sierra Azul Nt. Uarsrhue Ertall orr-Jul-83 27 JUI83 160 F U Possible trade of density credits 9 Siam Azul Sierra Aral OR. LWOOM mhvaa 21-Bet-83 60 F U Poosible try of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra AZ4I Nt. Ummh= Nariscoll, 14-Dec83 16 40 F U Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Axel Siam Aral. OR. Etawbn Clif 14- 80- 42 F U Possible, traft of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Azul Nt. uwmhw Barlow 18 81 120 F U Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Axel Sierra Aral Nt. ue, Stour Imrestments 13-F r-88 65 F U Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Azul Nt. UPSAW Dim E4-Jul m 69 F U Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Azul Nt. Unumbum Soldwin-Wallace Colt 1 SS 87 F U Possible trade of density credits 10 Baylands Sm Noteo County Baylands Motbay, Community Associates 12 ffr*w-00 1 - 40 F N 10 saylands So Natoo,County Saylands Leslie Salt Company 13-iiay-81 19-J 1 -0 152 F N 10 Boylands, See► Rat" County Bayl fray Cammity Amociates 1446v-& 19-Dec-0 23-J 88 F N 10 Daylands San Hatto County Baylands State,Lands Commission 13 w-m 11 98 L N Former,World College Wast and P.O.S.T. parcel 10 Bayl line Peninsula Open Space Trust WJul-80 17 Jul-80 09-Ja1-80 54 F N Former Leslie Salt Co. parcel 10 Baylands Stommms Santa Clara Valley hater Dist. 76 27 1 1 E U Road vasemont rat reviewed Pap 1-4 i Z34 7rfia �/f► ' r.�i+ ,q: ° J t' CGae�.ff�rfa f '.,::f9j6? is► -8f i�� "�Sf: :--`�.�e b s C. nl - `j ,�Tl�kll �', tT►1�aNl gYfyM.;e !!�i;l,ei I"5b Ie•iQi+A- A 7 � �`. �F. t li >>�� t'� �f! + �'. s'I• arLE Eqd►'27 5f-;'J CR-+i -92 4c ?fBi6 ;cif } iwelJ .�. �,g=r.. - - -- er,,? iOt' Qr' gar jaM Ir. -3d ii 8d p0Z7Fl-; ;43:;[ .sys7cll cckg., tls{'l elbl.f VS41 W. 7.k" It-W-" �r�-�-�t ` !�;• � bD??1;-r ixsfc. -,P 1wa;;). . zw� -- IFMWap r; --T-- a f KIM M. T.or,, 21 %'rc ! rt� �J16 4.? kSftl III' .� d ecp., .,i Q! h a :{ �3L`1TC�tf l6i14tX' �1.1J� ;ar,-0 W; s ++' Jza, OE-111}`f-r� 51-1111-4 Too t :.} yrws;� - --- _ -. -------- 34 s .4 �i7Rd ?Gii9 n M{: ,' � . S?- M-ci J��i` `t� '_'C, r ow!alb liT al%jv +� --kpow 11=: :36 b-�'�Si� iA'i►o11h S+j � $ '�'vt,1+J 7J gTGt�b !j$r1j ; s4iRt^3 X fr'31 tb-»! 1# 266- .; t "NVOi 'jinn d rw"Is c+r 764H3 }xrr; , _'fr ^0a I?-Ito-. fi-1"-1.3 ;3i � #: trial-Tr ,:!A 43 V., st7 5. . —*Mot.vs, -•- "� a rffitl3 use, ?76"s M117j Tlbi'IIV c ;.1oo 16f-,L iJ�--� AltuJ' 63 a � �.� b;'i �-�.�. ►t:zl � �sluy^yeW�cx ?rsf .t �snJ ""41r Zr Tw(,ju rukw 2-mr,"tw, PP0, t 3� 3E E p.se oo; ;. ?+s4,,.�>a' ri , a{ ; .s 4s r� 4*kf _ ------ --- -— -- ij i rt?eM.�4 "sri 7iad� (}�.'.; 1It'ri+ t� b BcoelKfjy 1� S1.-R+ (1f? ►J ht ? �,'E',—% ;MW 0,yQRfi1'Tj. i:ft,41i: ;�.;,.9 tsrd �'rfwMr yst t �v►'vq� bG'aQ � E +le�._T��T :�8-��-� S_-�d-8'c ;r ;,t.,..� is _ — — _ - 49 W �prx rz� yfe"a+.is3rsd5aa� Ra ilp '' ^3-'3J- (7 +�d-JJ`� �i ;J2fi:�jls ;: :y w �I s,,q?Ae 1, Table 2. LM CFRY-DEDICIATM PROMS Ron dater 13-Jimr* File raw: LAW Board Fee or Medicated Area Approval Closing Dedication Eassment by Notion Uplamning Sobarea Grontor Date Date Date Acreage or Low or flos. Notes 1 Haseler theater County of San Fran:isco I1 10-J It-" 293 F N 2 H. of Skyline North El Carte Nadera Creek Alm Hosking Ranch 1 -3 04WO M4W45 95 F N 2 tl. of Skyline North Pertain Dusk Redwoods Calkins 28-Jul-2 11 570 F N Includes formerly sadodicated sommmit 2 Y. of Skyline North Purisim Creek Nedsoods Rmcw camda de 1 19 -OP 174 F N 2 N. of 9171iae Nwth Porista book flodmoods Rancho Canada de 164 21-4ta 09-Na 100 F N 2 & of Skyline North Purisiea Creek Radmoods, Rincho Canada de -3 S#'►-Na J 3 F N 2& of Skyline North Pertain Creek Redwoods Fukien 1 -A4 A4 -4 169 F N 3 partola Valley Coal Croak Fine -80 1 -1 23 F N 3 plorkwa Valley Coal Croak Ross W 01-Jul-* 14-Jul-82 56 F N Portola Valley Coal Qmmk Liner 01-Jul-62 14441- 40 F N 3 Portola Valley Coal Creek Stalls 14-Sa 19-M-0 09-Nov-°63 13 F N 3 fortatla Valley Coal Crank Hybl 19- 184 1 -Fe 15 F N 3 partola Valley Coal Crak Peninsula Opm Space Trust 8S 13-Sop-05 -85 1t F N Former FwiwW&z tercel 3 portola Valley Las Tramos, Dahl 2 76 1 76 11 79 274 F R 3 a Valley Thornmood Sierra Club Foundation 1 78 31-M-78 14-Feb-79 A7 F R Portion Issued out; portion in life estate 3 Portola Valley 4Fir4y Hill Peninsula open Spam Trust 29- 1 -0 537 F N Former Corte Naders Assmiates parcel 3 Portola Valley windy Call Anderson 1 r-2 1 82 10-Na 6 F N 3 Portola Valley Clint Hill Badvtold 28liar44 r 44 y-84 27 F N 3 Ourtals Valley Mindy Hill 21 1 -A4 1 F N 3 Portols Valley Mindy Hill Peninsula Open Space Trust 14-Nov-84 1 -Ct1 2&46v-0 1 F N Former PM parcel 3 a Valley ViAdy Fall Fiore 24-Oct-44 27 12-Ow-0 19 F N 3 Portolo Valley Mindy Hill Nartin 1 -CF - i -0 3 F N 4 Rancho Sao Antonio Foothills Blair 12-Jurr74 31-Ju1 74 1 79 90 F R 4 Rancho, go Antonio Foothills 75 16 J 7'5 1 79 70 F R 4 Rancho go Antonio Foothills L 77 77 14-Feb-74 10 F R 4 Ranft Son Astonto Foothills Giuffre 27-3 03-F 27- 1 F N 4 Racho, Sao Antonio Rancho Sea Antonio 75 124m-TS 1 79 3% F R 4 Rvdw So Antonio Rancho So Antonio Archdiocese of San Francisco 13-Jul-77 11-M 77 1 79 IS F R Part of 199 ac. tease 4 Raft Sao Antonio Rancho Sim Antonio Cho 14-Ma^-84 Ob -84 375 F N 4 Racho, Son Aftwo Rancho San Antonio Close 14-fFu i t -0 2 F N 4 Rancho Sm Antonio Racho Ban Antanic, virmll Pastore Du wm* 14-Dsc-77 -77 14-fob-79 430 F R 4 Avebo San Antonio Ancho San Antonio vindmill Posters Petersen 12 IS-Nov-SO 12AW-80 80 F N 4 Rancho Sim Antonio Skm Antonio windmill Pasture vi ship J 27 1 WJwrgl 251 F N Subject to leassol another 29 ac. in Nonte B. 4 Pacho San Antonio Antonio Windmill Pasture Hidden Villa 13-M-* 03 23-Nw-83 240 E N Om qwe euemmt 2-1 16 ., x ;-v . ., ! b u Nf 2� s � Ts-(�:-'a5 in-bor.- 53-Nri�W3 � U c. var cw, a o� „I amux" ab,, IC:wo PACA r�p mic 'io n; qw t) ,;art;. MiiuF�JD 54-�t`-61 11-•t6D-9I %--'l", ':; _ K ;;�; � -631W.' ._ .,fIL, Lo13V E` 3%, uW96010 b9.' ' -IS, ., tcwc. jjr.nQrtsl .a,* ;;i4%LeFft, -Mc -94 ]6 s�' -0) [� ,_�.1 i} E 13 dPlOP, WWI 'J• t 7�j �f " „#•►,: �w Nwt w•'.r t'.)ICA DWI(t �/� I�-.►�„fl.;a,;� e_•i,�3-'� Q.3"t�}�l'�z �J t' ,sf .e 1 {e` t ►a - ., fir,- b... p fa ?l t bi 16' - +` 17 �9a[.. „-� ythG,►JQ wlL�}14 1'^.'4vL; `jM+t1l1 ,y.>-Rom^-1? +r-'1�+�'•1a if-;:6D•-1� '' t tl 1-tr41 • �� Y�-B'9 z � ;"�+ 2u►t�;c�i.'� h4'iT�1;a :fl��. i5 1+�++-!f 3f-In;_..j� i��-9:5 _ 3� ,' t,c'; '{." ;,=�'�' t�l'4� Nil LIB 5��4-�4 �.:-tiK'^-4't iS�'''-�t I:! ► �i �.i „c,�.sats pM j6i �Irg1 t#J � ►ga�r�enl! pCe,a Z�b b.n-� It-Mc -9i ;i�-�rla�-•9t SE•4+�`"-�+ ? r. Yi k��� �;•� �. ,ct 'R 3l 3 1` OtI .44 It -- 5i 9' 5T- „) 014asx 5j1'.,h R{Vq,4 B#)? pr 3 Dck,i^T'g rNS1i•'? A!* tpTi .,,�_�ole-Mf'c', (+:►�.� p1Tr ��lurtjr t]oF'.• ., 9G6 ,4aaf 3'�_D�-9; S�'19'+-61 3G �-9� i': _ � � K..re;. ,_•.sr beS�•'� �s*� �� ' :,,:� -- �Bi - z9 a dTy P,'Itbl, ;}lo►,+. lq 8t = 1;4p collt"ri ._,: t3-? -�Q 31-04-19 Wt6P-le z, - :eat%^,. Iar. q � ` • ? �� ? tat` ,•,el;iai+ r�� ♦�f1L[K �aw1 ,,.*en_�L' iU-•D�•-�P 'T-�'� " t r y # CAI ps�K bw+ mmll OW W s LWe; 5Q-!� �? I -t� 1 6 �i ":•t.�+�., �+��ae��. =�: 3 4k4lf h-9114A Al VAN1 13-iF.....gt b f'�I'� r1+J1 ia3' 1. Li i !.alz I+h rh,-;n 15-'r:.=-w 93 o- 3 a'' 015 As1iw• sl 3 bft4'0I9 pi!16; D, ab .i��� GCA1 EL"o F _,s. +1�t'hw�tsib ��-k� -9G :2-IC��.-Q, 3S c '`X f'a.: UW r _ �j11I"ib[.__—.____ _.YL'•v `.. _Y_b,.... T �,"_l` —. v7 C. __ poi. t b&II1109 ss; y ct*+pga , ,s: �s ,.sue S..-tks�-33 oe-iMa.-a 09-1104 � t 01 w!IM6 iA 4ii ^10'MI CrwW Pa+«c a " i;9k?g� ;f 1$ k A-P 5i M�a-93 'k3-ii�^-?? i • !1 of r1716 a4tV �i riTi15 ( .i� �r.;w;as 1411MJt+a S9-'1rb1-% .?-0-95 tde _". L JTA"jtsloo 2 C at " '' - iK'L r CI Ztkjo WggE;.a t' 12-td a ..: -97 ic"4ob 8c Cs� k 1 - , hivcw '_ Al L a '►^ a't.� rLbblii.t4 ;"9A#9 �14!le .. vi of;f Hp E500 e. ( f 9 MAT T r tK I#1liE%M 21 s 4 Rwxbo San Antonio Rardw San Antonio Hindeill Were Trot for Hidden Villa -83 23-Nw#43 07 E N 5 Nonte, Bella Monte Bello Pap hill Road Avi U-Nov-74 1 74 1 79 760 F R Partial interest with Ligda in 760 ac. 5 Nonte Bello Bello Pap Kill Bud Lilkw 07 75 II 75 1 79 0 F R Partial interest with Avidano in 760 ac. 5 NWAO Bello NwAs 1r114 Pop Ni I I MW own Be-vv-7l 77 I 79 610 F R 5 Nonts, bit* 9e110 pap Itill Bow Eldridge 1 77 07 77 I 79 150 F R Nodification of agreement appvied I0Oct 77 5 MIN"Bello Bello Pap Nill bw own KrJ#1-78 78 1 79 13 F R 5 Nonte Bello Bello PW#ill Bud Stwftd University eb-76 7 1 79 69+4 F R lbdification of agreement approved 27 78 5 Nome Bello 9e110 Pap all aw Investment QwT. of Philadel. WJAn-79 79 14-Fab-79 100 F R Subject to tree fare law Bello Monte Bello pop Nill -W 31 r-80 It F N 5 Nonte Hello Nonts Bello Pap Nill low Naridon 95-J 30- 95-J 169 F N 15/16 interest in 169 saw 5 Nonts Bella NW40 Bello Pw Nill new Ilinship 98- 1 97-f I 98- 29 F N portion in Reecho San Wonio O.S.P. S Bello Nonke Bello pap Hill el B-m EIJ -BI 97 F N San Natec Co. portion closed enw w 20-Jan-82 5 Nestle kilo Nonte Bello Piodarkti Ruth Picdwtti 14-Jot-76 1 76 1 79 2DO F R Subject to historic winery Ism Bello Vats, Bella Picchetti RwAh Cones 1 y-W 144ay-B4 107 F N 5 vate, Bello Swabw SIP Cher 74 74 14-Feb-79 136 F R 5 Bello Saratop Hap Boy Boosts of America y-76 15- 76 14-Feb-79 1 F R Nistakenly withheld free dedication 83-J 5 Nonte Bello WAOP Gap Bunetti 1 76 1 76 1 79 975 F R Part of 355 ac. purchase 6 IL of Skyline South Long Ridgy Long Ride 78 04krM 1 79 386 F R 4 ac. of original 390 ac. traded to Bodhi 6IL of Skyline South Lang Ride Bri 79 04-J 54 F N 6 N. of Skyline South Long Ridge Smith w r-81 Jan-8i 15 F N 6 W of Skyline Ridge II 1 - '. -82 20 F N 6 W of Skyline South Log Ridge Bodbi I1 ! p-89 31 F N Ant of exdwv transaction 6 IL of Skyline to% i 11 1 5 F # Nox l 6 N. of Skyline South Lang Ridge 07 95-J 80 F N 6 V. of Skyline South Long Ridge o* 07 -0 95- t82 E N Open space and public access easement 6 IL of Skyline South Russian Ridge Crist t 78 78 14-fib-79 13 F R Santa Clare y portion 6 W. of Skyline'South Rustan Ridge gist 1 78 17Jw79 14-Feb-79 117 F R San Nateo County portion 6 IL of Skyline South Russia* Ridge OWIM It-F" 19410-61 It-f F N 6 IL of Skyline, South Russian Ridge Crist -61 1 I24 IM F N 6 I& of Skyline South Russian Ridge Crist 1 -0 30- 12-J 40 F N 6 IL of Skyline South Russian Ride Crist 1"&rW 1t'rrF 164eb-83 102 F N 6% of Skyline Swth Rusian Ridge Nolte 1 r-O N5 160 F M 6 N. of 91tyline South Russian Ridge Nt. Nelville villia r-80 98 -80 33 F N 6 % of Skyline South Russian Ridge Nt. Nelville Odwooder -80 10-Nair-0 -80 12 F N 6 it of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Skyline Reach 27-J 01 10- 842 F N Subj. to tree fare and faeily compound loam 6 IL of feline South Skyline Ride lMwPi 92-J 18-Ju1-83 06-Jul-W 47 F N 6 IL of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Golan eb-84 07 r-84 80 F N 6 IL of Skyline South Skyline Ridge y-84 01J t 54 F N Pumhased in c Munction with 13 ac. easement 6 IL of Skyline South Skyline Ridge James M-Nay-64 01- 134W-85 13 E N Open W and trail eas& with 54 ac. fee 6 IL of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Peninsula Trust 84 15- I3 % F N Farver Daniel parcel 6 ii. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge emaw -84 31 13-Nar-85 39 E # Open space and trail easement 6 IL of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Lahr 23-#ry- 4 31-J 134W-85 99 E N Open space and trail emsevient pap I 24 _ _ f .. .: I Yi .us '�''idF 8nr+rt►N► :3��1�i,F 3i-Zt�-� J:-N�►-6� :td E � j��,o. T� y. :a��t ,• ;r ;w mr, };A(zw gYo t:rueara + ?t s, i r' S4-W' 12-lw-W 113-wy--W a� t .t ti.,4:61 --- - ----- 7- IT " 2MIP MMUX 1. .� {ff� EEy aa + - t-A . 4 s;,14 FWQ.77( - t?►� � tus 486 f s c �{i�tyi�+ :�t►r't at:�Ilti6 i:j�6 1,�7+KS _ '�"t�•� Ul-��4_y{ *..,�...>. ,..•-60 gG: •_ .y ?h} A t{ut 61416 q,k y 41-Lap_n M-00•'.6 i..c ?',P".' �' .v twa sx, is v: * � - r } • ,� ^,�.;tl 15-1a�' I4'�i..Ifi? 1$-�aff-8; '.. _ �. 6 ::•off• �d.'Y�' *us ?wFio MMar4w Ines Oi-rw it 3 1OA-V rsa Lt.,o wwr'l: N1.Qiu Cry' I2- W-'9I la-0-al il-tat-QJ ;39 t lK ` -95 V.Wtjl,,. eaMID J13qft ---- }'. 20,w Y'-- K "Y..^'��C9f J�f•-'tq !"�.L Ji�s is 1�{f eYL t+e' L Q f1 .} G ti Y `.-a.Y Mlt � - �y �-pic-83 _ 3(0"�'1��-pF'y3 �t.`Iy►`_�_" 1��` E � �.' x sCx1 �a�l'lr 9crwe ,. 61 `OF eCy. .,��y75;pt rwA y�7^�. I us mil+. I1•-d�-BS 1:i-"-�'-•J�' S2•tf"' 4r, 2 GA.ca; C r ;'�1I; ti,,r:,i' bt4'� Epp? i'-004-K, ' "-9S vt-d-(C.-Is s' E ii yu; i -Cc{16�:e „ cs �: `t1 �i► "Of� i �y.pc.+t_;,� t1t-vv.to $2 "6 kv k A ,.. - V d { ; _ _ 51�- -�1ip /yty�SDB �-11a SLa� r3Bf L< ^� o►'� °: 1s 3t' t�'t =^� ;� �4V� r .. •:6 �K: f '15si w(s a '--4$ j��7-.�•�iC 1 V.._i(-�.J� f d-G '1�, } ' L b ..l:.i :, �� . ._:K 6 .'+ rL4j0h Jim (!Ct aw" N66.•,e9 Gpomop6o"Wo -a# RAW-las'p t C piW$f; EST iJ Uya+-' b "; ? i¢- ni-S i2 1 .i -*YP-Sd aC+ir �`t�k�i " V'r�tarc r� ►ter:, -as�a, wy.. •-6; I- r-c M • , iW ;,,.,teat c_,N" 'a ;, , v-.k'ts jai(c M�•%ta 9R1i�' bps M?Ii i C'Y�+••e 50-1*i+-hJ 5,i--`_aP'fi' S6-1R•'-41 '� t M v" iMa+ F? e- b�'"•�'a !�' �'Ceu{� (�•,.�• paIt�, �p tot I•'= ;ems , `? tW*R �'+4JcW ".2 'l'�+-9G ?�1-':;:u-�ri 5t 1tw+.iir Ira E 12,7 Te? s��e 0 OWN- ( wvp Paj To `-A N pfimpm -ft z M 2 V1414 CV! a AST I" LAO W I I Nw. lwmwlm,4 Cam` 0i w.i r?4I 64-144-,a U-13 k et o twa ,1 'a sue,< cs►tC(: PT ctgtu w r Fog iN" 4"q rVviAc-.v1h `` ":►'ia 6�:; 0WO 8617D off; wi' em E It-OP q&&W_U. :t'--OC: _. 2 ='�"6 b�.. Me'„i psi Oat�b K?13 aoi4 n' _ S--1 ^ h IG r ta► ; is a'�ut L�1ta + ti?'? w' tl� ►- +..'�d i�-$ -:�i Itt -►� !E'i 4CuC'a; •k4A:. 'AT *3 s ,' J ' .. �;c. �, s1a+�r ,+uc't�c dat•'- tlk�rato K� �.r±I :,•3i�t�1� i�t t� rIR?�' l,•;T� C'ii-iK+a'-� J3' s�-'i�g�-�' 33t? � �,'x�,r e;:�.;;,�,,„J 7 Fremont Older Fremont Old Lyddon 1 75 75 24-Fib-79 266 F R 9duact to historic Ise loans 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older boy, 75 75 War,00 36 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Cocciardi r 76 76 1 79 5 F R 7 Framont Older Fremont Older Nirkalo t - Z 4-Jen-76 14-Feb-79 6 F A 7 Fremont Older Frommit Older County of a Clare -78 77 23- 3 F R Tax malt aril gift by Claitor 7 Fremont, Older Fremont Older 77 1 7t 1 79 20 F R 7 F Older Fremont Older ti 77 ii-*-77 1 79 2216 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Nellis 1 77 06-Jmn-77 14-Feb-79 64 F R 7 Fremont Older Fromont Older 25- 118 F N 8 El amwe Costanom#sty Saratoga Unified Sthwl Dist. 1 75 23 7 1 79 2 F R Soso El swim VIDQVIR 1 75 4 75 1 79 905 F R Part of 1001 ac. pwchose 9 Sism Atel Los Satom,Crook Society of Provivew of Jesus 1 19-Oct-84 14 174 F N Part of 964 ac. transaction 9 Siwft AM1 Si Ant, Kimmady had PN # Amwiatn OS 17 14-Dec-83 21 F N 9 Siff" A:ei Si Atsl Nt. Lboom Divivich Trust 24-Nov-W 1 O4 24 142 F N 10 8aylaMs six woo,county bylWAS vootboy Community Associates 1 -Sb 26 134pr-63 44 F N 14 Siiyl y Saylawk Leslit Salt Company 13-14ty-81 194vek-81 1 -83 152 F N 10 91kylanda say,Nita county Sayl "boy Community Associates 14-Nwi-84 19- 23- 82 F N 18 saylande, San Natoo County Saylands fitake Lada,Commission 13 W-M 11 98 L N Forcer Varld Coll and p.O.8.7. parent 14 Sayiands lint Peninsula Opon Space Trot 09-Jul 17 -Sb 09-M-00 54 F N Farmer Ltslie Salt Ca parcel Pop 2-3 f P to i0kis� ter es,� C.'. aF. <, M,q,.%"Tv 060 2X+ AMW Jd-'Ml-Q!� ;.- Wlal-W 2f ! caa; :< � � _ ---,yamf n la ------ --- vYM._. ,_W_�_—_ ��8x Ya -�f- -t - -- ;— M------ , .- i.~ ( j .se ?H F1�+-- `i' �S s' 'c"s" Piw, ccxwtr B9'�'Y.'p "Pox raw lja tPoeml4fw la-mr-W IW-W 16 t � :( b�'ti►q� jyo *$so r:oruik aeAfajw iny; �, uk 13-Id6- is IS t d a""a w p., MWA a,z;+! *'%YM plt s.'u' a►+tt aft-W SO-1C•!0 $#-�vj"^-QC s Ei�At al"I wl ;, ; VO" w t "Wx4st" ?. - ..r, Is- it-# a'3 it t ii . • , • �•. .� c;ru.---- t 6 : �: s � c -— ,I 8 Ei FSAAW El aumip fQ-£ -3e 43-OPA-1Z 14-t4-]a a62 t b 3�r a� fp0i brt� ¢ a 4F i Cof�yuaeu �n.tja3e ( ' A1163 cc , �'K' it-irsh- 53-�f�4i1� fftN�-s� 5 L t -- —_ ' 1 t,:680k, 'Ift C>"" VAL ►9sI I to 13-t�D��� (1�-1n+-L f t-ftiP-:,� °� r d + 0I9" t 'µt ►JIB Nar Fj r 53_6P-'U f i-Ow--L 1ttsD-.3 S:F k h �' k_-,.. .. �;l:;s _�o:i A;�.. , awja o� �g;ai` ,,:u.,r 53-'I�'�`-�P rJt-l1�►-!3 5�-1��'-40 ° t � .e< �a�b s uc �a l� ,rA c,e';�,. I+A� � i?1 t►sar"'P r u WOO!`! 1:,WA4 134S. 4M-W-S2 53-1" i t aer4 r+moue ,? t It-0-12 Sat-8m -2 Vt E It 9s4 ►c WR;t:AL', Am 160?ii Table 3. LAW I W- tWEDICM Ron date: 13-J file ran: LANDS hard Fee or ApprovalArea Closing Easenevit MD.Planning Area Preserve Sidiarea Grantor Data Date Acreage or Lease boo for Withholding and Notes 1 Hassler Edgwood Comity Park County of Sea Mateo U-Je1-8 1 -W 466 E Recreation and Park asswent not reviewed 2 IL of Skyline North La Honda Creek Collett 28 -84 955 f Isolated site 2 W. of Skyline North La Honda Disk Owliq I"vl-z 1 69 F Isolated site 2 N. of Skyline North La Honda Creek Peninsula Open Space Trust a 1 S F Evicroadment problenj forwr Weber parcel 3 Portola Valley Coal Crook Allen 23-J 01-Iul-* Re F Possible boundary adjustment or sale 3 Partola Valley Coal Creek Vista Point Estates 11 01-J 127 f Possible bourdary adjustsent or sale 3 Portola Valley plorvillmood Osw1d WJe1-80 28- 4 E Trail eassomt not reviewd 3 Portola Valley Thor 1 -81 22 14 f Possible sale 3 Portola Valley Windy Hill Catalano 16- 14- 10B F Possible trade of a Portion 3 Portals Valley Nindy Hill Corte Nadera Associates 1 -0 2: 1 E Recorded instrumvt allow for relocation 4 Rancho So Antonio Foothills Struggle Mountain 13-Junr79 18-Junr79 10 f Possible sale or tradal isolated parcel 4 Rancho San Antonio Axicho San Antonio Archdiocese of San Francisco 13-Jul 77 11-Oct77 80 F Possible tradal Part of 199 ac. purchase 4 Rancho San Antonio Rancho San Antonio Windmill Pasture Dovenect 14-Dw-77 77 1 E Road and trail easevent subject to relocation S Monte Bello Monte Hello NtCoha 24-Jan-79 2&+ 79 40 f Possible transfer to Santa Clara County Parks 5 Nonte Bello Monte Bella MMelton 26 07 18 F Isolated site; no public access S Monte Bello Monte Bello Collins - 07 8 f Isolated site; no Public access g Novits Bello Saratoga, GAP swatti 1 76 1 76 80 F Transferred from Molding agrewmit 15-Jul-85 S MMonte kilo Saratoga l 08 -82 106 F Isolated site S Monte Bello Sarstova, a" Blow 16-F 11 83 10 f Isolated site 6 Y. of Skyline South Long Rider Been 24-J 1 26-Jul-61 14 f Possible trade of Partial irk (house) I, 6 V. of Skyline South Log Ridge i 11 1 P-82 13 E Open sp. am. not rev.; includes 4 ac. 7 Frewnt Older Fremont Older Brooks 10-Jui-85 13-J411-85 4 E Eamment not revieesd 8 El Strew Brigs Creek County of Sant& Clara 10-J 07-J 1 F Isolated site; possible tradal tax sale 8 El Strew Costanomi list' Nudd 1 -82 13-3 1 E Trail easement not reviewed 8 El Strew El 1 78 03 flbv-75 16 F Isolated site; part of 1001 ac. Purchase 8 El Strew El Strew 1.0011 -84 38 F Isolated site 8 El Sereno El senmo Daley -85 13-Se i F Possible sale or trade 8 El Strew El Serimo Atwood 18 31 30 F Possible sale or trade 9 Sierra Azul Los Gatos Creek Society of Province of Jan 1 p 4 19-M-84 94 E teen sp. am. net reviewed; Part of 264 at. 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Anil La Point 30-J -7'S 30-J -75 20 E Easement not revismall isolate! site 9 Sierra Azui Sierra Azul Kennedy Road Kinviedy Trails 73 79 M F Possible transfer of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Anil Kennedy Bell 09401-80 22-Jul-80 83 F Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Azul Monody Goad Liebelt WJui- 72 F Possible trade of density credits 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Azul Kennedy ith 14 06 3 F Possible trade of density credits Pop 3-1 a 8 1 Ft .'lca ►'• - _ , }(YM►ti��l X+4 P �:�Fj. OV.•jl I :s r-)A-r, .j 1 ht��..,i,e films ({ 74.RUA 1i44713 1� y . ,4•�.F1' , A:.y..F�� T 7 ^I-A'- 3-11115+ �/ NJ t Cam..��� �i SF� :t .,cYi •,{ ...5 �y V --sue--` • •.•F i 1.,. .:1�: T+F. .:x a. f •, ��� `MJM' f• L.1,�. {: it #�'m fir 1,4t 30 jo-im,. S !l4i ' ' Lk :fynii�3 3i0'b Ba .'li i5� us �;ii`eA„ a�,'Sif .Ii �,�'�.�..-:�����, h n),LG6 ;E•t'x J �'' t ,• ,,.yy�� � '� � ,}� `�rL' 3f. 5�3;• t;Ti".....�j fQ":�i•'T".�_ � G, 2R+�• V"3 .-�!"t�` �.�'`If�a �.�w �'. �.+C� �F'�,r 171 t•F �. �c4Bu< ��YiA � F+b-9F ,6 a . .`' F' �"�K•a: ;o�F-; 33t.=--y' �:..'Ypa-xi 37 t Irc�s{sq tt�r '�:.t � >�,. �n'`�tt�f.'..�R ;�k:�'s'1F• ��g ,�r If�-�4•� ?�"'r���id`'"p��? i � ,��Q J��`: .Y^; i!?E'.-� '0�":ii' E.�P *i&lS'TSqt'1 �: 76► �. .;.:;t �'tI6: 3 is-_ 3r '?-Jn,.of V F t!i 5s'..: .: _. •Sm" 13T r zC oJ4�� J?�9V' li-t"��-65 1�-2 A' i3 " ,��„ i ��•t,x•; t► lowyw, p yc r!3 ,:Ifi, fj•61R �d- . 'A"dJ a8`'t''•:-�F I : Jt�2 1 c i 103E t i ALA y i lit i to 261 41'FI'p '.:F� G."L- ,- - AE I F"•"A17. •+ `t, ' 7r� 41 L jt•�Qi �"S ILT'�. _ xr _• F,:�i'+3 y t7'" "�K$V#�,� �93 � �� �� •�"•"�i''` vrj:s�"� ��� F)!�+t.Y��4'�#� !'` .i.4T�9 5� :;:t� .;�-'A:'�i r3l -oI9tw. •--tt1 .•o VP)rc wren 1 / •+:'��•� 7l1 t DVJf !F; tiAWJVJ6 tC. yR,'.to :I9� 8 Cam'. 4 31 ., tF `1 x p ..Z`i rwj,., I t X .+A4?; .s`; _ - rla:P�11 - tq VVQ T;77 T MrOUN44 WT!W4 4!tc,rr xi,.id ,I if$► '- ,' + "=�►' t.v*oetc + ^Srld tijlt Z t F •^f_ .1 t'- it, �e�- 1 a EF}�I je �cs4;3, 1 L'X 7 1, 7 i '•. ;k+c„t =` Luc• •Q� B; ;; •`B; 'i = �•xrrp�e s;Iti #t t"W4 :VOW 79 ', } ,d �tT'!ss rhi , 5 ot.�9 -e5 JC., c oompu pwAq,: t� � ��r�� ;�.,:v ''� rtanCs C;.�E,;t �M�:j�.,� I?-1'+: 82 IP_•-!M'!�•8� r_3 _ iK,,etfi: a;�i 42! h: '-bb&•-?f 70.','�,>, c 44; _.........- •w.. .. .», �..- wY`,w+fw+ r,r•.. •ly�.w�IF....,. +v�•Y►#1!,..r.,...+�1rTW..• ...-. Fs� Mw.rr.. .•w+.. .rrw .-w.... -.....-w+-. .........ww..r..«.. ..., .w..................w " wrr....v.4t � ---- •w ...r- .�,w. ... .... r-..+sue.. r•.�4rw•..-�...�. 47 _ �a�� ---���--� ► psi+; - ao� • C' ^n Y 'S N% L .'1 y ,f �WO I$ Y)" IYJ a y- f mw1 cw "Urg 2 PW;AW tss 3 T T Let 91 'tsTff Am AttsA 6AI3 ssTi is IA% OT stiP&o 41 jo apw4 amsw j 06 a %-+ -ET ablI03 sniml-u ve W04m 1N IRV TS tsztl $ TS 6 SUP&O 441 JO aW4 aTq 169 lama Um amfm ''m TAzd vj.%jS lard UATS 6 supw 41vjm jo apw4 atq;swd 9 aa GO-Oill IVARtumi AM Wqgdq '0I T !S iRZO 6 sVPw 441 40 VW4 sIqWwd j 001 Tsl t CT +at raTi 'tit Inzi "GiS IRV TS 6 supaw 4lav aW apm4,smu% 3 * tii- *-Aq"i PAIII13 firliffamIN Taz4 iS IRV UmIS 6 141PW A41VABP P aW4 slq;ssOd J Ot to-NMI to-m"I tWAN a `tii tam IS tnzi ITS 6 s4iP&c 4;ow p aw4 atq;nq J 09 li-PCH2 *I* laze 'IS TRzO IAOIS 6 241PLO+Tit P qw4 stqPwd d 091 OFIRNZ S-Tui"-W TT 1N Trau sAlmis PM wATS 6 supw 4 aid t iatq;swd 3 031 i t T sPIaT4S WAPAM 'VA Inzv tS isztl s iS 6 supw 4;vApp qw4 a d S9 a-AKI +m j w 'Tii ism "MIS Tazfii WATS 6 supw 4;sw p mw4 amsum j off P-tO 6t T "PaWei =4wM 1N Tszu s 16 Fvd CLOTS 6 je III ut 'PT 9/T IA4;VAP aid► aW4 smswd J O 6t T 6L ZT 11r,1111m `tN Tszif iS Im WATS 6 m JET si `wi vi f4wo p aigi 3 III Wmf-ti 6C -£T aftj ampm 101 Pzv WATS Ink I-w;S 6 sus ta; 14trAp aio aw4 atqpw J OT t"-Ti ! JIUV3 WAM mllw'i tszii iS 1sz1T TS 6 "WIPIP 04 WIVAWI I a LO -ii0 a al;vmf i THU ts THO s TS 6 >is VW i *# wlVmpl A LE wmi(FT£ T t3 wqvAs wAm utman lam e4mis TKU e Tii 6 OWIPNP 04 U09m"I j 3 A&isT# WkM uTT4iwTI Tftzu iS Prd WATS 6 "VOI " WIPOTAI j SEE Wwr4l Z'T 45i aftt stt*wil Tsz! WAiS Tm 8siS 6 ja }ad tsWtpap o4 w;W&4ul 3 OE LT 00-~ 4;ria wkm sT tail Tszi! WAIS FzV iS 6 iPsP 04 WIVAWI 3 TWIT T *-MT-g B+iTPs;N wAM 1AJ;4WTj tsZf TS INi iS 6 - nd Ia-*061-41 Si Atli,•V2 .0 kSW;4k 044i;L ')!► ;(yfi, i&f .i� i Lip' .ri *b Q K E ► 8(liTf {ba<{6 �} i� i. i:' "jar `ft 5-!CC-t� Si-Dw-5- ISO E bMalp!F IbW 04 q&WI;A _ <. a a�>? �;=al �ii' ���.�rna �;;* :_ . !+-il��+-8�► '.•4- -Qt s5 k twap?fi ;Lwo c•t qup{fx ck")o T4W 53 #0 o k 34-20-)K� r1-a'-;-4, E rta ;U*grl IN t` V*tIp!s w"v of 46*0 0*jfa �. ,�,-.=�,rn► � aaa+.� "oR-'_sC-6: :i-ll��-�� Z5 t b�'et�Gi� t�n� o} tia �lrf� " � [!ruxr� �s;u+sL:_:a. a-�rv�ta .a is►'-4�3 IP€ ' ;apt?Ip;:. ;:,..�� .:� gErt1� '.sc{T: _ W5 in -E-- C} WWI IV4 ' MF" � ��►g xi-iF�+-� ;f-1+�'-ir1 1�, k i�°�"-°:r�s ;�.tigs a� rsv�;;!+: I1? suc• rL j3y �:. . . fr • !2 I+wlr. !C c pWlpg IL44e .« t�6Yas;�: ;talgYsa efts c. c ,�rJ,cw 3 5I-1iaa-8I 3I-,j"T I. t Iota! fo Wicsfe! V: s a{ I3-w-9r 71-4 ►-B11 S4 2 t 10MIIN ;o WJcefR s: ; IC-40A-W 1j-1s A-W X, € I►t s:: to c ;rs¢rf b++ A r,�sys+ s4�.fru?e ��?-?rr�.,..�; I3-tom►-114 151 � 1-'4�►f?.a,' fv n�fb 4 Ranchat go Antonia Ranchat San Antonio Windmill Pasture Trot for Hidden Villa -63 e3-*w#-!! 07 , 3 396 E N 5 Vloote Bella Mite Bello Pap Kill Road Avi 27 74 1 74 14-FFih-79 760 F R Partial interest with Ligda in 760 ems. 5 Monte Bello Naete Bello Pap Mill Asa Ugh 07-feb-75 11 7S 1 79 0 F R Partial interest with Avidanc, in 760 ac. 5 Monte Bello Bella Pap Nill 77 02- 77 14-Feb-79 610 F B 5 Monte Bello Nate Bella Pop Nill had Eldridge 1 77 07 77 14406,49 150 F A Modification of agrommint approved 10-M-77 5 Bella Monte Bella pap Null Road own 26-Joe1-78 78 144 7S 13 F B 5 Monte Bello Nonte Bello Pap fill Road Stanford University ob 76 8 1 79 694 F A Modification of agreement approved 27 78 5 Monte Bello Monte Bolls pap all Row lwyatwvt of Philadel. Jan-79 79 14-FFe -79 100 F B 9dWA to true fare Issue 5 Note Bello Nonto Bello Pap Nill PAW &mum 26 11 F N 5 Bello Monte Bella Pop Mill Aced !Haddon 25-J 30- 25-J 169 F N 15/16 interest in 169 acres 5 Nonto Bello Bella Page Mill Road Winship Jan-61 27 1 W Jnr81 89 F M Another portion in Rowho,Son Antonia,O.B.P. 5 Monte Bello lolls pop Nill el ffi 21- 2b 97 F N San VAn Co. portion closed escrow 20-J 5 v4nw Bella Bella Picchatti Rench Picdwtti 14-Jol-76 1 76 1444109 200 F R SdUact to historic winery lam 5 Nonte Bello We Bello Picdwtti Rvich Consi 14-Nsy-o W 14-Meyer? 107 F N ii 5 Nonte Bello Surstop gap 13+e ► -74 74 144W79 136 F R 5 Monte Bello bratop Bo Bay Stoots.of America ffi y-76 15-J 76 1 79 ! F R Mistakenly withhold from dedication 23 J 5 Monte Bello Gap ewwtti 1 76 1 76 1 79 275 F R Part of 355 ac, Purchase 6 ii of Skyline South Long Ridge Long Ridge 78 g-76 1 79 316 F R 4 ac. of original 390 ac. traded to i 6 IL of Skyline South long Ridge Bri 79 04- 54 F N 6 iL of Skyline South Long Ridge Smith wi r41 WJNV41 15 F N 6 % of Skyline South long Ridge! Room 11 1 W -W 20 F N 6 iL of Skyline South Long Ridge Bodhi 11 1 -N 31 F N Part of exdwV transaction 6 W. of Skyline South Long Ridge Bodhi 11 -82 1 -81.+ -82 5 F N Former Nozenko, porcal 6 W. of Skyline South Long Ridge Chasebrough 07 83 30- 25-J 80 F N 6 W. of Skyline South Long Rim or ugh 07 3 30-OK-O 25-J lee E N Open space mW public seem easement 6 W. of Skyline South Russian Ridge gist 1 75 29-Dec-78 14-Feb-79 13 F R Santa Clara County portion 6 W. of Skyline South Russian Ridge Crist 13-Dec-78 17-Jan-79 144909 117 F R San Mateo County portion 6 W. of Skyline South Russian Ricer Colon 11-Fsb-81 1 1 11-F 1 MB F N 6 W. of Skyline South Russian Ridge gist -81 09 1 12- 190 F N 6 W. of Skyline South Russian Ridge Crist 16-DK-41 X-Dec-81 12-J 40 F N 6 W. of Skyline South Russian Ridge Crist 12 J 164 164 102 F M 69. of Skyline South Russian Ridge Molts 13-Na -W y-05 160 F N 6 W. of Skyline South Russian Ridge Mt. Melville Willi 26 28 -BO 33 F M 6 W. of Skyline South Russian Ridge Mt. Melville Schroeder 22-Oct-80 1 -80 L Oct-w 12 F N 6 W. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Skyline Rench 27 J 014 10-F F N Subj. to trot farm and family coopound lean 6 W. of Skyline South Sk line Ridge 1 nce^pi 22-J 184al-83 WJo1-83 47 F N 6 W. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Ouinn 22-f 07 r-i!4 80 F N 6 W. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge jankin 01-J 1 54 F N Purchased in conjunction with 13 ac. easement6 W. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Jenkins 23-11ay-1i4 01-J 13 13 E M Dim sp. and trail sm. with 54 ac. fee 6 W. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Peninsula Open Space Trust 23-Ney-84 15-Jwr-84 1 96 F N Former Daniel parcel 6 W. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge Smoother 23 31 3 1 85 39 E N Open space and trail sammosot 6 W. of Skyline South Skyline Ridge lohrNay-8t 31-J 13 29 E N Open space and trail easomant pap A-2 � :. .d'� 7' "etc •��-i3s W - c ..:.E !'1Ki ii.= � ',K.y '� ,1. .-r� ui'il I.,-M�' t I: : �Y �'; :".i d1`_ •5:' kT�^�,' <<. ?�` �y� - c;�y..}y*4I.�� '�I--1'�`"'�it I$-1ts;".� �Ct ti � t,�._�y»!tip ..t tv'1�f'lt'„g ;�•.w'�i= j"• 3". i3ii-.'m. .. . _� ;a.r..t►s :d- .: per_ .� t - -- -yKAi.�� �5X•�'. "' $�-�'�'d. {7�'�-^"'4.7 ���yP�J � F A �_n��. fit' '-:46�' Z',.:lfFl4; le-OP.R3 IQ •,fir143 .. _. ,�' _. iF" „► +�f_'a «19 ��is1�n S.�. _. ! `t uh".► �.f i :! lvF.�� a..� '.3 r''''ry°'"�1 W64 11' ?ly bq—i. L'r' il-:-t- J 1;ttiQ"'(j$ ��'+3l1� .. .�' �`•.ti 671�y;4i2"S ,i.sY!!C •:ai - --- IWO I F-v'a".,� J-v -;Iq o 1 -- -- — k ' 5} f±l` Is 3cr-d gtr,� - rrvf 640L Lt:.' u i!^ !6 It-!A.W — 3-', e - , 3C' as fed bc• ., i }o 8�I1 ,- T yam, nat;fir IO-�ta_� 10 1 ;,_c�P-�•"E bs" 4 �cF"3r, Y ,-N i;_: Of T;O 2swo3s ;alb x wwo io - r, M so510 ; 10;3v b?&4wf#' SSAV AMA 1#-**A-W T0a t r ,s • ysl,� WC-04#7 '",sty p;c 4f! i#-?AI-it I2-M-2 Ift"- `• SW c ' - —— Mr{ ----- _�, Pi�l'�iil" 5I-isv-$5 Sf 8j -^d, t . `9.. rpjw }rov [.jCeE{ u -on o.1%, 2 „'Cy>;c i Tic W",;i got 5� yy y� *!ii tl Ms��r�t 5B-1 -9i S�-�K-9i 5B- S3 c. M iws4sti ba:oo- bs� c'r 2`4, tF);w,* 0' . � � 2 � *.Pill, WAA r ablI=' bobR?I I r"1 yam,NO!) !L. ?'r 1 �+►.. A 4 •,%to Ica _ iL 1i Wets BO Ic' yslic tilil W tUA"4WI C"b' �} o�'':J(01' S+t-N�+-1ii � z It-OP-A 100 t tl Ljk�S i. 4G {'"4 4" 16st-,�lr maw t``h�c� $ r k"J i GTfJ t rr n JY��� },tts;+�v .�" ��+,.si�Mt+� it-NP 43 N: t 1 Mt'ory"qtrLW 1 su66A.Uf ��b,. "AYW jo-,ti 0-1I0 nuts asI fr ob will Fjs m4 ►¢° U-W1A-.if i P-.'DDC--,W I e-kw 24E G �I s► o,.p} *;,,v 1-44 I v 1 ;, oc• .2sy b"Wi.• Mf:!,6II1 ►,# V,,A Is-elf; tc0• 4$gW !1?I1s 1-is 53•-WA C- u!-W-r 0 I= T-tl I N 3 MR E*-A 86-420-tt BtiTA UMIN aAlud Ittatx{tM Olw" MIS aT uts oqmq t `9 OPW ut 'Jv 68 J04 t t 04 430E N 3 Tw +L8 T f-W dwim aApw llpwm Olk**q WO 043UMV 0140 ! MIS v4mft t N d 00 81 Bt 8T UMSAW aat Ill"+TM OTua" OTWM VIS t 8 j Oct 61 T LL u T &A Ttt Rl OPA QPAM UIS aPUN t N 3 8 gF Tt 4 T SSO13 OF 'S OPAV QTuo t N 4 sa t6• 90 w-AwtT m 0€ *V 'fit 04MR1 oE+&M VIS t WSWIPAW '00 6610 4-wd N 1611 6L +tT L -WIT U-PT-ET TA" 06 3O 45=lppju OT ! OTWM MIS t d I t6E 6L T SL -at SL Q *V MRS OPM oVXM t N j t -L6` -13 &Awls slilqpc4 of uvS t v J QT 6L T LL LL 4M1 sttt o no OPM t 6 I4L 6LA1441 6C-W-9T 6t sttTq ! of wS oq=rd t a J 06 6L T tt taf-TE tL =8T -lFets SM440CU 0 WS 043M t N d £ Wwm *-=G-W -FiT u? ttTH ATM AatlaA et E N A 61 La W- 8 "ll 11TH ApAtfl AattaA a104-14d E ISUDd 3M JMJDj N # T t@ 8 t@- T tS- F-tT 4SIMI SMft U* VT tAM 11IN ITN AftleA elowd E N j T t to 88 tall +Pill AatnA of E N j 18 W- M Pt 11IN AputM XattaA 1104AOd E lowed savl=ft Imm opco JnAod N d La 09- T -63 09- MAI 0=4 M0 RtMtuad tiTH *111 AattBA 1I44JOd E apla Will uF aot#ral t}ao pnnl wg 8 d L4 6L4P. tt 1L-4*-tE OL T tV 0t9 ITS 41 It 11 at E N 4 t[8 U TT % T sL a two 1Sol xatteA #I" E found ZWAUAJ inni N 411 w**a +46-ET 1 ant got atffluvad PS43 t"j +flift VlOtAd E N j ST +tt -ST tti- T t#tH PBJ3 1903 AattaA wp4Ad E N d ET to tS- T t dullive *Rio M xattat! oto4.ft E N A % *-PMT taf-T4 t- 3 tit Ant IM It d E N 112 TB-+t T M to T M Aotl#A e'Totft £ N 4 E t u E9 ap MI'StAd 44."Wttt46 JO 'M 8 N 1001 tth T8 -9T aPJM +P nl'Jt^d OAM a lIAM P 118 N j tit 8N- ♦tt 4T apmA 411 SPOOM WAG aatat WAIIA48 jo 'M 8 " powimm Alimml samijul N d 4LS TT 10f-S8 VA14tM "list 4941 MITT S 0 118 N j MG % 0 0 T tpwv 5uT wtv a4in 13 'milks 40 'M 8 N A SO MANIFIT f-4T TT oul-mu3 0 L -40115w ATISIN T am sw jo anal Jo go# opq sm 40 iuu etd vN UOTM AR 03 U01401poo g+Taat3 tY Ta��TPaQ � i sm aaaau 0113 -ET S""w of l s k ..' • t ru l' b1, ' `' ►', . + t-�� -':fiG__ --- -- 1 .35 uc dew vk.rar,c jtuay=D SF9 -Bi 5�-E I .d-ylWl SaI ::.r 'Cuta. •« 2 a gl'-'vjjC `` ' VtOL.; ,3.Cou p-.4k V4c W, ;aa v4s,.�nj IS-W-Wi '9-#DA-�i0 v d'XiD *;IN WFVV$" TIfttto elm Vui 04-'e442 �+5� �wr_T x T 4S"Vyr''..� q�.y�,l�.�r � i[i ` ----�— 6 -�L 1��'9A_l.V .'� '.�,:. -'._.���.-�- -----�tTyl tf :t t�'� 11a rT ]��1t+�� i -lR'�t•`�,�, -ye 'y /.•._ t` C E �: i.'i'� i.•..7e^7 __ - 17 a.'p.e^M r,..eJiu. ►�.:•��`t 4b 51r y V'-�� 7�'- ^-.R iS'•7�`.K' ��-L+r"-.!� f. d TT,,: S!•1•u-35 03-t�- 5�- �` if: l ► . i:ll .2 it-top-la 10 e ;��>«�-� . . "_��-;1� Bjlr° r�,.��, ,f 3T-3!aT•1t I�!-t�€+-1� aJ . s pwalutajV J.xu ;,�t,: c J,"?411-NDA-9# I2-W.A-9t S8 il�^-2a ri as ,s,i W b;;cv S_ L rtj WX ii=' i+ lo-ll� t' -�5 xf-+r�►•-@S k y - , r _ -lap EWOK-#?o" '��-iR 3, tiGi-:Q it-tom-. �1 I� r y�.r:ur jVJM art 4,1'gTOW 11 ?;Ei 50;9:. •cz 1mwa 0'4 S#_*DA-yf 1 # J%Afj -W I z- ry�x'if^ e i`k k LOU*,, OLAWJWS .. _ .`,�< ►�►F1 I�il�'t-�t i9•;9�+-�i I3-t�+�'� is - ' k LAI ky .�! roll L ��4 � -6t 02- ►-W 2-1ft4l 5 z 5E40-a 4Q-'vw-v 3 k b$.,eJ:s 1%,64 t'jqw�oql i -0" 51-W-" oi-wa•43 104 t Yi ;okra oak-min rucs,. tpoql,.am MUPWO 58 INT-q5 je-ro-a II-vn&* 14 k i ;,.:: -a" 40+OL?A ,.w,cglty4G4 f �liiwup , ,. (via wor W o'u 1' 124d- 02-�-W Sa'-2�b-� 3: L it --r . %I L M Kul; ►L" M. I)i ic"M +.+ i. i;' _ +; T ?�l�=,rtig` fit �`"�lr It"#T.iE�'' ''•' 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Lyddon 14 75 24 75 14-Feb-79 266 F R Subject to historic Dome low 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older in 75 08- 75 23-J X F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Cocciardi r-76 76 14-Feb-79 5 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Nmqwlo 09-Jon-76 24- 76 1 79 6 F R 7 Fremont Older Frmsont Older County of Santa Clara 23-J 76 04 77 W 3 F R Tax sale and Rift by Claitcr 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Srwy 23-F 77 1 77 14-feb-79 20 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Nmotti 77 11 77 1 79 216 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Nellis 1 77 WJ 77 1444b-79 6+4 F R 7 Fremont Older Fremont Older Sarrod 25-J" ffi4A2-M 25-jwrw 118 F N 8 E1 Sorwo Coatanw Way Saratop LIhified School Dist. 1 75 75 1 79 2 F R 8 El Sereno El 1 75 75 i 79 90 F R Part of 1001 ac. purchase 9 Sierra Azul Los Beta Creak Society of Province of joses 1 1 -0 1 -84 170 F N tart of 264 ac. transaction 9 Sierra Azul Sierra Azul Kennedy Road AN 4 Associates 9 17 14 2i F N 9 Sierra Azul Si Azul Mt. Untolbus Difterich Trust 24 10-Ow-0 2 -80 142 F N 10 Daylands San Mateo County Saylands bay Community Associates 1 -80 26 1 r C 40 F N 10 Raylawls San Mated county Baylands Leslie Salt Compapy 1 19-Jw4l 13-A 152 F N 10 Baylands San Mateo County Baylands Westbey Community Associates 1 -i44 19- 23-J 82 F N 10 Daylands San Mateo County SayloNk State Lands Commission 1 r-m 11 9B L N Former World College Woot and P.O.S.T. parcal 10 Saylwws St line Peninsula Open Space Trust 09441-80 17 3ul-Q0 Whl-00 54 F N Former Leslie Salt *6 parcel I A-3 d .a8fi�i � � .d�.;'t#�kL(i .' ', 'tip d."L� � � y t't` �.A.r,� •'ia��..^-��wC' �: r�"�'i�`•�; +.�S:. J °J'}• :�..._. . > _ ` '� 4t �`'A£T r''y ..1'.�i-�.�r y� :�•'t�` � ,yet *wn f; ?1t3 y. ,r Oil �� y::a E T ` s Ob-&t-LS IIN—vK-60 tA--mt-S. tt' :� M iiZc�':"�KJ ,^8 IOGt �a .�1 ? = ,'f,C !'C-h�-+: LK-,�i4-E4 �'t-Qa�-u, �-•r.1.4 _� �Ysr .: I` iwa t t ^rt As to YC I Is a-Me-# h_ -T! cZ-4994'x, t,� *�rtc m#s{a aa�'� ilk '�•:_ �i�:�; 4_� rtra ` a O¢ f.b-rail I J6wtli4-a5 IX-va"I yttl'mJ*l_WAAW -- M ylv;QR<, 10 tita'_ lot E t� : c•7 Itic- ~,_yr�. M aP !! -ELL i8 �-s! - - ��'�,� �'6`� ,r;�r .�fi .lft ' BLit �. �- � � ,.o:a�.are: �. f +rT M� x curfq�c; -4SVC .:,r jf r; ! 1 ju I8z at - r L L L )l 8l 4l RESOLUTION NO. 79-54 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DIS- TRICT ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR THE DEDI- CATION OF DISTRICT LANDS DEDICATED LANDS POLICY WHEREAS, this Board desires to reaffirm and memorialize its policy concerning the status of District lands, now owned or later acquired, with respect to the distinction between dedicated and nondedicated land: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the policy of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District concerning the status of land it owns or administers .is as follows : 1. Dedicated Land. Dedicated land means all real property, or interests therein, formally dedicated for park purposes by resolution of this Board. 2 . Undedicated Land. Undedicated land means all real property, or interests therein, that is not "dedicated land" as defined above. Undedicated land shall be considered to be held in a "planning reserve" status and shall not be considered to be. dedicated for park purposes within the meaning of Section 5540 of the Public Resources Code. At the time of acquisition the Board shall decide whether or not the acquired parcel of land shall be dedicated land. Normally undedicated lands within the District 's boundaries will be held for future dedication to park or open space purposes, but only -after the necessary planning, boundary adjustments, provision for permanent access and other changes in configuration, which may involve the disposal or exchange of interests in all or portions of such lands, have been completed. Nevertheless, un- dedicated land stay ba used on a limited basis for park purposes, but any such use shall not in any way constitute an express or implied dedication of such lands for park purposes within the meaning of Section 5540 of the Public Resources Code. An annual report shall be made in January of each year I showing which District lands are in planning reserve status. The status of each such parcel shall be reviewed as part of the regular land use and management planning process. 3. Transfer-Dedicated Land. Dedicated land may not be conveyed except as provided in Section 5540 of the Public Resources Code. 4. Transfer-Undedicated Land. Undedicated land may be conveyed, transferred, leased, or disposed of at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors. 5. This resolution supercedes Resolution 79-20. I� M-79- 34 t MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMOR-A-dDU`3 February 6, 1979 TO: Board of Directors FROM: S. Norton, Legal Counsel SUBJECT: Dedication of Acquired Lands to Park and Open Space Purposes Introduction: Because questions arise from time to time as to the dedicated or nondedicated status of lands acquired by the Mid peninsula Regional Open Space District , staff is recom- mending om- mending that a formal policy be adopted to clarify the situ- ation. Discussion: As you know, District enabling legislation (Public Resources Code Sec. 5540) provides in part that "A district may not validly convey any interest in real property actually dedicated and used for park or open space, or both, purposes without the consent of a majority of the voters. . . " The question as to when acquired property is "actually dedicated and used" for park or open space purposes is somewhat elusive. "Dedication" is not defined by statute, and the origin of the concept goes back to early common (court--made) law. in defin- ing "dedication" Black's Law Dictionary (Fourth Edition, p. 500) states in part: "A dedication may be express, as where the intention to dedicate is expressly manifested by a deed or an explicit oral or written declaration of the owner, or some other explicit manifestation of his purpose to devote the land to the public use. An implied dedica- tion may be shown by some act or course of conduct on the part of the owner from which a reasonable inference of intent may be drawn, or which is inconsistent with any other theory than that he intended a dedication. (Citations) " Recommendation: To eliminate questions as to whether land has been dedicated, staff recommends adoption of the policy contained in the proposed draft resolution patterned closely after one adopted by the East Bay Regional Park District in 1974. Dedi- cation is accomplished by express resolution of the Board. Absent an express dedication by resolution or an express ex- tension of the planning study period, dedication shall occur r M-79- 34 Page two automatically two years after the date of acquisition. In cases where, for example, land is acquired by the District with a view to possible exchange or conveyance to another public agency, provision can usually be made (with the agree- meet of the transferee agency) for placing the land in a "Dedicated" status with restrictions similar to those imposed on park and open space districts by Public Resources Code Sec. 5540. (Counties: Gov. Code Sec. 25580; Cities: Gov. Code Sec. 38440) We will be pleased to answer questions. SN:jg k RESOLUTION NO. 49-94- RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT HSTABE-ISHING-A ADOPTING AN AMENDED POLICY FOR THE DEDICATION OF DISTRICT LANDS DH9+eATR9-BANNS-PeE+eY POLICY FOR DEDICATION OF DISTRICT LANDS WHEREAS, this Board desires to reaffirm and memorialize its policy concerning the status of District lands, now owned or later acquired, with respect to the distinction between dedicated and nondedicated land: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the policy of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District concerning the status of land it owns or administers is as follows : 1. Dedicated Land. Dedicated land means all real property or interests therein, formally dedicated for park or open space, or both., purposes by resolution of this Board. 2-. Undedicated Land. Undedicated land means all real property, or interests therein, that is not "dedicated land" as defined above. Undedicated land shall be considered to be held in a "planning reserve" status and shall not be considered to be dedicated for park or open space, or both, purposes within the meaning of Section 5540 of the Public Resources Code. I The status of each such parcel shall alsobe reviewed as part of the regular land use and management planning process, and the JBoard may adopt a motion of intention to dedicate at the time of the annual report. Normally undedicated lands within the District's boundaries will be held for future dedication to park or open space, or both, purposes, but only after the necessary planning, boundary adjustments, provision for permanent access and other changes in configuration , which may involve the disposal or exchange of interests in all or portions of such la*Ast have been completed. Nevertheless, undedicated land may -be used M limited basis for park or open space, or both, purposes , but any such use shall not in any way constitute an express or implied dedication of such lands for park or open space, or both, purposes within the meaning of Section 5540 of the Public Resources Code. At the time of adoption of the Interim Use and Management Plan following acquisition the Board shall decide by adopted motion whether or not the acquired parcel of land 5ha-l+ is intended to be dedicated -lamer at the time of the annual report. <- An annual report shall be made in January December of each year showing which District. lands are in planning reserve status. At that time, the Board of Directors will normally dedicate by resolution any lands which it deems appropriate, but may also dedicate Lands at any other time. 3'. .Tvransfer-Dedicated Land . Dedicated land may not be conveyed except as provided in Section 5540 , Section 5540.5 or Section 5540. 6 of the Public Resources Code. 4 . Transfer-Undedicated Land. Undedicated land may be conveyed, transferred, leased, or disposed of at the sole discretion of the Board . of Directors . 5 . This resolution supersedes Resolution 79-20 54. Table 4. DEDICATION STATUS SUMMARY Acreage Fee Easement and Lease Fee, Easement and Lease Fee, Easement and Lease Preserve Dedicated Undedicated Dedicated Undedicated Dedicated Undedicated Dedicated and Undedicated I Edgewood County Park 468 468 468 Hassler 293 293 293 E1 Corte de Madera Creek 595 595 595 La Honda Creek 329 329 329 Purisima Creek Redwoods 2509 2509 2509 Coal Creek 158 229 158 229 387 Los Trancos 274 274 274 Thornewood 87 14 4 87 18 105 Windy Hill 594 108 1 594 109 703 Foothills 171 10 171 10 181 Rancho San Antonio 1651 80 638 1 2289 81 2370 Monte Bello 2940 66 2940 66 3006 Saratoga Gap 412 196 412 196 608 Long Ridge 591 14 182 13 773 27 800 Russian Ridge 835 835 835 Skyline Ridge 1119 81 1200 1200 Fremont Older 734 4 734 4 738 Briggs Creek 1 1 1 Costanoan Way 2 1 2 1 3 El Sereno 985 82 985 82 1067 Los Gatos Creek Park 170 94 170 94 264 Sierra Azul 163 3323 50 163 3373 3536 San Mateo County Baylands 274 98 372 372 Stevens Creek - Shoreline 54 1 54 1 55 Totals 14611 4452 999 637 15610 5089 .20699 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RATIFYING DEDICATION OF CERTAIN DISTRICT LANDS TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PURPOSES The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does hereby resolve as follows : Section 1. Pursuant to Resolution Nos. 79-54 and 86-6 the Board of Directors does hereby ratify and reaffirm the dedication for public open space purposes (pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5540) of the lands shown on Exhibit "A" affixed hereto acquired by District and previously dedicated by adopted motion or resolution of the Board, as the boundaries thereof existed on the date of previous dedication. Section 2 . The Board of Directors does also ratify and reaffirm the dedication of any other lands now owned by the District and previously dedicated by adopted motion or resolution that are not shown on Exhibit "A" , as the boundaries thereof existed on the date of previous dedication. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ADOPTING AN AMENDED POLICY FOR THE DEDICA- TION OF DISTRICT LANDS POLICY FOR DEDICATION OF DISTRICT LANDS WHEREAS, this Board desires to reaffirm and memorialize its policy concerning the status of District lands, now owned or later acquired, with respect to the distinction between dedicated and non- dedicated land: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the policy of the Midpenin- sula Regional Open Space District concerning the status of land it owns or administers is as follows: 1. Dedicated Land. Dedicated land means all real property or interests therein, formally dedicated for park or open space, or both, purposes by resolution of this Board. 2. Undedicated Land. Undedicated land means all real property, or interests therein, that is not "dedicated land" as defined above. Undedicated land shall be considered to be held in a "planning reserve" status and shall not be considered to be dedicated for park or open space, or both, purposes within the meaning of Section 5540 of the Public Resources Code. Normally, undedicated lands within the District ' s boundaries will be held for future dedication to park or open space, or both, purposes, but only after the necessary planning, boundary adjustments, provision for permanent access and other changes in configuration, which may involve the disposal or exchange of interests in all or portions of such lands, have been completed. Nevertheless, undedicated land may be used on a limited basis for park or open space, or both, purposes within the meaning of Section 5540 of the Public Resources Code. At the time of adoption of the Interim Use and Management Plan following acquisition, the Board shall decide by adopted motion whether or not the acquired parcel of land is intended to be dedicated at the time of the annual report described below. The status of each such parcel shall also be reviewed as part of the regular land use and management planning process , and the Board may then adopt a motion of intention to dedicate at the time of the annual report. An annual report shall be made in December of each year showing which District lands are in planning reserve status. At that time, the Board of Directors will normally dedicate by resolution any lands which it deems appropriate, but may also dedicate lands at any other time. 3 . Transfer-Dedicated Land. Dedicated land may not be conveyed except as provided in Section 5540 , Section 5540 . 5 or Section 5540.6 of the Public Resources Code. 4 . Transfer-Undedicated Land. Undedicated land may be conveyed, transferred, leased, or disposed of at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors. 5 . This resolution supercedes Resolution 79-54. M-86-05 ' (Meeting 86-03 14, January 22, 1986) NIIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 9, 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager PREPARED BY: E. Johnson, Secretary to the General Manager SUBJECT: Revision of Authorized Signatories for District Accounts and Safe Deoosit Boxes Discussion: In accordance with the Rules oilProcedure and as a follow-up to the Board election of officers for 1986, it is necessary to revise the authorized financial instrument signatories for the District's accounts and safe deposit boxes and inform the appropriate financial institutions of the signatory changes. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the following resolutions : (a) Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Re ional .0 en 9 P Space District Establishing Financial Instrument Signatories of the District for Santa Clara County Accounts (b) Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Approving Certificate of Authority of Officers (First Interstate Bank of California) W Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Authorizing Signing and Endorsing Checks and Other Instruments for Savings Account (First Interstate Bank of California - Los Altos) (d) Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Authorizing Signing and Endorsing Checks and Other Instruments for Checking Account (First Interstate Bank of California - Los Altos) (e) Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Establishing Signatories for Entering Safe Deposit Boxes (First Interstate Bank of California - Los Altos) RESOLUTION NO. (a) RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ESTABLISHING FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT SIGNATORIES OF THE DISTRICT FOR SANTA CLARA COUNTY WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District has passed Ordinance 79-2, dated November 14, 1979 changing the signatories authorized to make disbursements on behalf of the District, NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does resolve as follows: Section 1 . The signatures of the present holders of said offices are as follows,l o and o ws n the Di rector of s Finance of Santa Clara County authorized y is i e to make disbursements in an amount less than $50,000 on behalf of the District based on any two signatures as set forth below: President Vice President Treasurer Edward G. Shelley Daniel G. Wendin Ernestine U. Henshaw General Manager Assistant General Manager District Clerk Herbert Grench L. Craig Britton Jean H. Fiddes Section 2. The signatures of the present holders of said offices are E as follows, and the Director of Finance of Santa Clara County is authorized to make disbursements in an amount of $50,000 or greater on behalf of the District based on any two signatures as set forth below: President General Manager dward 7G. Shelley Herbert Grench or or Vice President Assistant General Manager and I Daniel G. Wendin L. Craig Britton or or Treasurer District Clerk Ernestine U. Henshaw Jean H. Fiddes Section 3. Resolution No. 85-24, dated March 13, 1985 giving the most recent list of authorized signatories, is hereby superseded as of this date. (bi RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT APPROVING CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF OFFICERS (FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF CALIFORNIA) WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District adopted the following resolutions: a) Resolution No. 77-30 adopted July 13, 1977, approving, authorizing, and directing the execution of an agreement with United California Bank to act as paying agent on behalf of the District for the issuance of $4,600,000 principal amount of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Negotiable Promissory Notes, Series A; and b) Resolution No. 81-40 adopted July 8, 1981 supplementing former resolution and approving, authorizing, and directing the execution of an agreement with First Inter- state Bank of California to act as paving agent on behalf of the District for the issuance of $500,000 principal amount of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Negotiable Promissory Notes (Windy Hill Open Space Preserve - P.O.S.T. Property); and c) Resolution 82-57 adopted December 8, 1982 approving, authorizing, and directing the execution of an agreement with First Interstate Bank of California to act as paying agent on behalf of the District for the issuance of $6,000,000 principal amount of Midpenir,, =a Regional Open Space District Negotiable Promissory Notes,' Series A; and d) Resolution 85-17 adopted February 20, 1985 approving, authorizing, and directing the execution of an agreement with First Interstate Bank of California to act as paying agent on behalf of the District for the issuance of $4,000,000 principal amount of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 1985 Negotiable Promissory Notes ; and WHEREAS, First Interstate Bank of California has requested that the Board of Directors designate those officers of the District who have been duly elected or appointed to sign written instructions and consents on behalf of the District; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Midpenin- sula Regional Open Space District does hereby adopt the Certificate of Authority of Officers attached hereto as Exhibit A designating those officers of the District who are authorized to sign written instructions and consents on the District's behalf. This resolution supersedes Resolution 85-25 adopted on March 13, 1985. (b2) EXHIBIT A CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF OFFICERS Public Agency Name Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Address 375 Distel Circle; Suite D-1 ; Los Altos, CA 94022 To: First Interstate Bank of California Corporate Trust Department 405 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94104 The undersigned, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Coen Space District, hereby certifies , that by resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of this Public Agency, the officers named upon this certifi- cate have been duly elected or appointed are now acting and are qualified to sign written instructions and consent as provided in the By-Laws, etc. , on behalf of this Public Agency, that the specimen signatures appearing opposite the names and titles are the genuine signatures of such officers and that said resolutions electing or appointing these officers are now in full force and effect. You are further authorized to recognize these signatures until you receive our writ ten ins tructions structions to the contrary. j Edward G. Shelley President, will sign Ernestine U. Henshaw Treasurer, will sign Herbert Grench General Manager, will sign L. Craig Britton Assistant General Manager, will sign Jean H. Fiddes District Clerk, will sign I In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Public Agency This Day of 19 i By Secretary of the Board (cl FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLVED - that any of the officers of this District named below are hereby authorized to deposit the funds of this District with First Interstate Bank of California and to accept from said Bank, as evidence thereof, its Regular Savings Passbook, and that all subject deposits will earn interest at the Banks prevailing interest rate. RESOLVED - further, that the (District Title Only) Treasurer, President or Vice President — or the (District Title Only) General Manager, Assistant General Manager or (District Title Only) the District Clerk of this District are authorized to withdraw funds from said account, as authorized by Ordinance 79-2. RESOLVED - further, that the funds of this District deposited in First Interstate Bank of California shall be subject to the bylaws, rules, regulations, and practices of the San'&- ir. force from timie to tiTme and subject to any and all service charges now or hereafter established by said Bank, that each of said officers shall be and is hereby authorized to endorse checks, drafts, and other orders for and on behalf of this District for deposit or, if such orders, checks, or drafts are presented unendorsed for deposit to this acc unt, said Bank is authorized to- supply the required endorse- ment. This District agrees that all sums at any time. in this account shall be subject to Right of Offset for liabilities of this corporation to said Bank. RESOLVED - further, said officers are authorized from time to time to make withdrawals from the account and any checks, drafts, or other orders issued by said Bank in pay- ment of funds on deposit therein may be delivered by said Bank to such officers or any of them. RESOLVED - further, that the authority conferred hereby shall extend and apply to any and all existing Regular Savings Accounts for Local Public Agencies as well as all Regular Savings Accounts for Local Public Agencies hereafter accepted by First Interstate Bank of California and that said Bank shall have the right to change the rate of interest with or without written notice and to limit the amount that may be on deposit at any one time. I certify that the foregoing is a full , true, and correct copy of resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the District, whose name appears below, at a meeting of said Board legally and regularly held on , 19 a quorum being present and acting, and that said resolution has not been amended or rescinded and is now in full force and in effect; and that the signatures appearing on the attached card are the signatures of the persons who are authorized by said resolution to sign for and on behalf of said District. IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said District on 19 Signature District Clerk Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Supercedes Resolution No. 85-26 TIME CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT IAxPAW1111INMYING t,o 4-2.231873 �CORPORATION TIME DEPOSIT—OPEN ACCOUNT - TIME CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT NArnE DAft TIME DEPOSIT — OPEN ACCOUNT Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District RESOLUTION NO. 86- — t c4-r.e4 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES "RESOLVED that any of the officers of this ewpornfron nornaf holnw arc hereby authorized to deposit the funds of Gulp,L r�r !his�T:�t:wr with FIRST INTERSTATE DANK OF CALIFORNIA nntl to nccl:pl from said Bank,os evidence thereof,its - '—"------"--"' Time Comficates of Deposit t erpM1or,anVo dolermine and fix the amount of oath such deposit;and to ag•ee with said Bank for and on behalf of this ¢iron,as to the rate of pinterest,if nny,on said Cortihcates of Deposit and Iho maturity thereof and to end orso said Cortificalos on behalf oft his ecksiG'.nlrei;which authority shall extend to any and aIf renewals of Certificates of Deposit. RESOLVED,further,that: . the „y, Treasurer, President, or Vice President --- --- --- --- or any(:nc.vr;.aer,,emle-,:Ne..g„fy, General Manager PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ,,,Q9,,,,e,., hthe,;,,,,.�,M,, or Asst. General Manager (Moa,« r en , Adm. Services Mir/District Clerk TO FIRS TERSTATf: BANK OF CALIFORNIA or the [`ieirrct nr=�+rr�3 4s ...v orryi rn _ ._-• _. _ ----- ._ California. _. _.-_.._ _.-- 19_ of this 6er{+e+ai'AA aro authorized to withdraw ft�'!s o�this rprfu,"fifien from said account.Ord;nwn.a 79-L --- nd ._ -.-_ -_e A---- rrc. The undersigned are of the co-partners of the business conducted under then a of--_ SCLYED,!urther,that any'oflicers of this e�iturwwe named above are hereby authorizoA to deposit the funds of _ this r rf with said Bank in the form of a Time Doposit-Open Account and to agree with said Bank as to the rate of interest,and the notice of withdrawal thereof. RESOLVFD,further,that notwithstanding thoforego;ng,nnyChnck,dra^,orother instrument issued bysaidBankin - and mvlvotly Ogrce.dfloLafty of VIC ul.. iduulsnomud_ab n ovo-oro out zod to deposit funds-of-fhis-"iness— paymenl of any Certificate of Deposit or nnyTimo Doposil-Open account endorsed in favor of any bank by any of with you and to accept as evidence therea •our Certificate of -posit and to agree with you as to the rote the person.r.amedabove orby any other employee oragentofthis"l�1 4�oilhorin writing orby stamp and either of interest and motvrity thereof and to endots 'oid eertif tes. We fvrthcr agree that any of the individ- with or without the designation of the parson so endorsing. cols named above are ovlharizcd to dcposil funds j .Is business with you in the form of a Time Deposit RESOLVED,further,that the authority eonfor,Qd h rob hall extend and apply to any and all existing Certificates of - Deposit issued b said Bank and now b thist'�le-. Es -Open Account and to agree with you as to t rat (intelesl, if any, and the notice of wilhdrowol y yri!anas wellasall Certificates of Deposit hereafter issued by said Banj.andtha!siidauthority shall remain inforceunlllwrittennoUcooftherevocn!fonthereofbytheBoardofDireclorsol thereof. You shell have the right to change + rote of into 1 or repay the deposit upon 30 days written �rrl�� notice to the undersigned. If oi,.orahen shall have boon received by said Bank at the otlicn which issued the Certificates of Deposit hold by this g a wll.a�nt the time of such rovocntion. It is mutually ogreed that any_-. _of the individuals nonr-4 RESOLVED.further,thatthe authority conferred horeby shall extend nndnpplyto any and all existing Time Deposit- obove are authorized to whit 1 w funds from said Time Deposit-Ope, ccount. Open Accounts hereafter accepted by FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF CALIFORNIA,and that said Bank shall have the I PNE ACKNOWLEDGf�E �'t:CEIPT OF A COPY OF FIRST IN7 ERST E BANK'S CURRE right to change the rate of interest or repay the deposit upon 90 days written notice to the undersigned. SCHEDULE OF A UUP:1 FEES AND RATES. Q I rt'vriattheforegoingisafull.true.and correct copyofarrsolutiondu!yadopte4��tB�ardof Directors ofthe r �rtc. r�r�' +� rip, cwpe.el.e.1,whose name appears below,at a meeting of said Board of q. he cip I.q jo�oname appears below,at a meoling of said Board legally and regularly held on January__— s - -- --'------ 19_,a quorum being present and acting,and that said resolution has not then emended or rescinded and is now in full force and o!tecl;and that lhesignatures appearing onthoothorsit�oft sCli d are the signaturosof the persons who are r.� authorized by said resolution to sign for and on bohalf of said r:rryro, re!+nnc C)iSI,"crr --------- -'IN WIT"�ESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and Vie seat(if said eoapnre!rrm on CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT TO OA NUMBER NUMBER GATE � NUMBER � DATE sSUPERSEDES RAIE ARESOLUTION NO. 85-26 L NOTICE U^�}• 1 11,1 1 s- r t e r k RECUIREO DAYS TO.104 2/32 _ n i N v I: t a i RESOLUTION NO. Checking Account cowvnwr,u»w.,c wccuu»r no. «.»{ r L21idpen_�n_sula Regional Open Space District 630198001 -'•....»,u„ - {,N«„�,.{u n..,{w„»,,,,,N,{.n RESOLVED,that funds of this oolpor6i.inrbe deposited In FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF CALIFORNIA(Bank) Subject to the terms of this signature card,the rules of the Bank,Including all amcndmonts or additions there!o, Edward G. Shelley ,w{f,nl Ml all applicable laws and regulations and iho practices of!ho Bank In force from time to time,and all service ---- Charges now or herca`tor established,and that Daniel G. Wendin Treasurer C, President -- Vice President General Manager Ernestine U. Henshoo _ Treasgce „, Aor l,sst. Gen. Manager or A ql SQrvi s Ianager/ „ «r of o' I Herbert Grench General ManQ,g, ,r, t7istr et be and they are hereby authorized to sign Checks,drafts or other orders for and on behalf of this corpeaatwnt and Britton p r that each of them be and he Is hereby authorized to endorse checks,drafts and other orders for and on behalf of L. Craig D r i t t o n Asst. General Y'��b this co, uratmn lot deposit,encashmen!or otherwise,and said Bank Is hereby authorized to honor and pay on account any and all checks, drafts or other orders signed andlor endorsed In accordan5e herew)tfL or if Jean H. Fi ddes Administrative Services Mdngprl 1 IF.rriC p,esen!ed unendorsed!Or deposit to this account,to supply the reouired endorsoment.This Zotporulionn ag'"s 1 _ _ - _ _ that any sums at any!imo In this account shall be sub)oct to RIGHT OF OFFSET for Ilabillilos of this ooi I,-5 onr i$ r 1 c er r< to said Bank to the extent legally permissible,and agrees further to pay said Bank on demand the amount of any OVERDRAFTS on said account,and ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COPY OF FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF — CALIFORNINS CURRENT SCHEDULE OF ACCOUNT FEES AND RATES. RESOLVED further,that Bank Is authorized to: MAIL ail statements and vouchers to the last address on file with Bank, u Tic-7 n-cy oncerne wi tin ❑HOLD all statomcn!s and vouchers until called for.If not Called for Acquisition & Preservation of Land 965-4717 within 30 days,Bank is authorized to mall statements. 7i 5�-Y.rC�- eowro N•.e.onwe,{ -nr sw,e eu cou{ Alt responsiblllly for loss In mail or In transit Is assumed by this eorparoi:otr. ' 375 Distel Circle, Suite D-1 Los Altos , CA 94022 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that the above Resolution is a lull, true and correct copy of a P.esolullon duly --- �,{' 1'1 pn�i s.•rcuc«ruwiu«c•oo,{u :rt• s*•*{ =-.co�E adopted by the Board of Directors ofl�idR����1�L4�Ll4�Qna1 O��n Space Dust. _ same •ccou«.row«{,ur wn»u•n«.,u«{«r _.- 0 g y J.anuary�2_ at a meeting of said Beard re vlarl held on. t9_8.6_and that the kt�Qwr� « signatures appcarin,on the revorso hereof are the signatures of the persons duly authorized to sign on beh3ir of JS o 'Dt-r TrG t- »*wOGV{co.• {�,{or[,D{hn•iurton Nuu{{w saidcoroo-a^onnnaccordance with the above Resolution. Supersedes Resolution ,� 94-2231873 ,�r,r . 85-27 WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the said Co=pu+atron BANK USE ONLY o.rc ov{»co yx i».. {u{ro>r r{rn,{(w NO w{CUv{O wuc{usco c.c�r1 (SEAL) f I DO.101 6/81 CORPORATION ., f�� ' �: � "-f'f'r F a4Yrr•.:.... _.,,y..,nta.,..;r....r. .- r. •-.•..., ri SAFE DEPOSIT BOX CONTRACT: .,;. ontE kEnuo' :,,;:r 't},'' 'f,.,y rr l' aox NUMaEtf i 11 r TibJ1' r:!;,. A 1 t :.r.,� } •k,f: 1.• }i1. � }••; r , ,• `� , CORPORATION' lr ;.• rt.., s t , ": ,,>;',\• t +�4.;,,t. ry i Q + IT S O RENTING A SAFE DEPOSIT OX '�l•r,,�.-}',;:.:a :;.;:,.,,`,:•;T.: t � ... t.t .. ,: � F�r•�;•>r� TERhAS•,AIJD COND 1pN f R t3 .r ,, ,.L:..•-*�:J•''',r.', r RAIC- .t'r+ = ,,,'�^.:- "r^t .Ff .�"L 'i .'fis-+.r •.�rYil , NAMf Or tQtrYf/folfiMF•: 1 :1 1. ,r.'r• r .-.�: '•.f, ,,.k U 1C genCy x 1lfr: Jt�, . ..:t.t• 4t r. y�J�'t+ "pe1''Jfir",t,1.• i{i '+ ti t: lc t '+'- t.•;S= "•'.,t.,, .,«,,, .,-, r,�ri 'V.'C,r, ,y+..r,.i....<t`S.S;•b`.2'r±it?.A1!'Y ',f' J tSJ:•�,Y{'h ii .... j,•`,j�) a,,,, t45 .`�l. � t r;!try •�•'l sr ♦t!{- ,f:!41 •,r t` ft, { v? :r rE.T IS PARAGRAPH LIMIT 'THE BANK' IIAb141 Y.'BANK IS�A'BAILEE FOR HIRE AND IS OBLIGATED ONLY TO USE Midpeninsula'Regional Open Space Distric't,;;::'•,. ," ;-,.rti...,,,,:,5 ,,,:r,;.,,7r z fi .�, , N. T +GtY:- r + .;Cr• •,+;t z OPE• r;,;.•;;,:,: tElfrt/pN :r_•r;:.? t:~• lls.-s r':f�.Y'EQRDIN.{�RY,CARE 1 PREVENTING'TrE OPENING OFA SAff DCPQS BOX BY ANY UNAUTHORIZED PERSON,AND STREET AUURE55• i I�:- .t4* (� r•rltttr. s•.t,r „h.,�/ d ;< :, :'S RE lY•- •Cr f 'T 1A N A K'.S All'. l DER O,FU THER LIABILITY O RENTER WITH RESPE T`: , -v:r�rl{i, ,�•r''°�''• Ir ,,., •:;:•,,.:}4 ,, , .( ,.,:, .� .�. I.:.:�xe.} s5 „� R€,R,..► . ,I. �,P, .N, N u��� N. R it Y T c .:< 965-4717:- • � � �' �r.N..- T� . �• G. Fr9,P.,? �r,. Y: 375 'Di stel circle, SO 1 to 1 s ' Los ( 1 tOS {t CrAit,9022,a {?r$•;;t: "8 , t T ERE ,TN 'pPEr�IN O 0 A� UNAUTI10R1;FD P�RSDN ShlAll NOT BE PRESUMED,fROM THE IQSS ! . 4, ,/yr.', 'r..jM;tk ,;..,r ;p, ,`,�,i- :,,•d;/x•• yi-.�• p; ,1FANYJ?ROP�FFTYAf{E,Gf�P4�,(��Pp$1T€ IN TNC�ROX,(F(NSUFANCE PROTECTION I$DESIRED ON THE CONTENTS ;.r A;,'.1`y, .., .,r....,v., ,f:?.,t«:jl4r.,,,r i ,i,•.:.. r..r'f,:`•i.-i+..,.., ..;1t;�r,'Trr ► 3r� t : i ;.a RESOLVED, that a safe deposit box'shall b rented in Fi '�Intarstat Ben of laitor a In act dance with the toims pnd';•'�:s ' r� � Qf,;T ,1$iS. E$j [1r (j :R,EN!fgj ONT�CjAN INSURANCE COMPANY. ' •conditins roscribod by Bonk;and that (v rub t P L.t r„ . 1 •F r-A 1+}it.,K)•! ,rl { ; a•,. ;rr ,,;. . f,. , p T J �a�wL 1t Yd ;�lkibC«Ll�'f�.dr+ +eesmer,bo and thuY r:. eT . . Tt �� b , P ); nn c.` t 1 kSr o RO rI�f;Ri;,�tny ol`�grl�t 11 h��y�,��+Slig�ltall�Y RYii(}�r Vt j Igvy(such os p legal re resentotive of the'relUer V+ ate(he is)hereby authorized to,'sign(ho Dank'i regular form of contract(in bohalt of h(;s+otr?v�f+lsliont lb l 1 C!!Agen y., k,; VRQ pfp.� 1 IQ +of ,t f!e ►i la. 1�{n 4r>d'lliTprl,Bslq �f>jhm�)rf of right of access to Bonk';snriffacrion,slluli r? 1�i FURTHER RESOLVED that ciceess to saki sofa deposit box(Jp, 1449 J. (y�� I "duf�np�Jq it t{EI esti'ltpviy vsta(,Ushed from time to rimv,subject to;,) „`�'_�';ri +,' ^a• ',',.t rr: ri •., +.•r `;"'i .,e' "'�.rk,d�•�•tt*a::5»�'„ .dig-. «.a;.p,rr r„ •�,�.Jif'ry iIii purr 'i" .,.,. ,, , ^a ra, •�4.r S J '-' � ( rl.f• C.tllllf n tl B f9n t �.. ; OFFIC First Interstate BanlCof Celifor'nia s all bo to tin One 1. `,'4.•: r a0 ho'h llowtn oipd ,t..,. �. j.} ii """,yy� :�,.�a•;. �1 ,'t•:, r f'.t�' �. �1+ �<F J� 4•�'t-i cl' � I�.tt �, •., Y; Al �;.:�( P g•'I. Y 4 a. ,• '�!•:,; a{•. •' '► .E t"•31•R1..�5'hr� :� r ,�'I7,?4/,'•s,.,.+a,:N�',E>�`il��i..,\F rr?Ki':�:7� f;. r.: ]. s: 't�,•.,t+k 5' .a•.,t;•ca .�,}: 1 , r,.:C3..t:/,=;s!T`? i �.• �T eiR Ue s f x r b s8d a the de It' f,l? x to e ( e of o n li uid or ro i of on. ; Y. T r. };,;YS••„7 ��::�� i�e J!r ,Jl .al tE ° 4,. P any q P PO lY ,rc;-,� ' :,,SIGNATURE 1-:••c.:.i • CT' ;.r x I st ;d n p 0 i (f '•� 9 1� r ony r ert r;jhe,' ossession of which is �rohibited'b low or ublic r!;.•t+ TYPE NM,ES .T' '',• i + ;r '.?+,;4t•'�.. +i , A gt t } ,�-A.,•,.YOuy,+.ac,9.T;y+j.TT elf �Y.�,7rrFls f ix r.r, ,F.9P Y ,..r..P P Y, P r , r ,� a ,+y.:•, ,•r J:,.•,. 't;`,:!,�i:5•% , t utau •Or' hl -'m o {son t0 nk!o t on of its'r 'fersjif-the Bank f as` easori'to'beli•v .k r•: 1 t w {,, ,.?. R i,I Y i' •.�,t'b; , t s',>�s; d f@13 p�. rS.,Sh s. Y, ,,fP ..#hg. P. .y en r a e. ti ,.I... l.. ,♦.: �L• .•.. .fJf' ;l.y.vr y a r•,. t t , 4:. :A i. �Ey @ ,C C�t) r.G:. i, 4., . r1.. ,1 'L,.,/�"` r,,61 , l �,l:i [' ( .1,'1 ..a,»; L:i' r'Sad •r!�a A. .` .�, ` ,j P re i den ,',}�'!.►,;., i %'� i:'f:it:'��i ;.\.,, .-,••>)•yrt :'t:: •}t (• •a Pt the;Rg rarlha,fie II Irted,'o.be depo ed w t In the bo la g}r I i Edward G' She11 e t i thr fr �,, . �tit, >i ny item proscribed in the precedln y;;t r r 3 ;FefltepcBC:J Lei ankahp') Ihn ye Ill ;rtgli;wiih t't1 ti0Is (lie Re'le i to forcibly open the box and reiiiove+� 4H :rti. V ilrr,a•: `. n' ., �. ,p 1:_ .(. �., •'ir,:' �,�_ Y y:. r 5�..ri..S... •''S' ;Y. r:,:,. . T• y'Y,.,.. r ..�,. .,{t: t. a ,R 'C �:: ••r �....r` ,y.-o".:.,rl':}.-.,,� •.t. !1, ,•. ,,h � '-L, as. {{,� E rr� %t "],,•. 'd a tr,.l,i .4 j rr ..,1• t,t.; , Ernestine:rU. Nenshavr r.::..r,�l;i•:=. .rt�Ard<ler►� ,}, �., ,. ;., � r}.9 hF . ;. ,• 2' r"a ur r' r•C r, r....R,. rl f t; ,-C,A l' X f , t "f� �� h'RY ,y� ,, u y ersons also entitle ''4' er`;:>:,:x.: Y..,.- ,,::; r, i i 9%I ,t L n rof r r_lt ( av(nq,� [g} j 'lying person or pdto i:r w. .�, + ,e tl' .l t• I, +` P� q. ,�,, t .r ,•„s;..f. 3 sE..� .:• •J.:r -'E 4l._ •9� .,�>. � � '1,t-•��:K, C� i ?� 9.�• �,.._..1` !T t t ;,, +r ,. ' ' ;t rt. ,R, ^` G 's hal I d 1 f e ,o ,• t 'a cess fo the box shall only be ollowed,,: t,,5.' .♦rt><�.. r�, ,�v ,l'; ,:' �f.,,,. f.( .r 1'ri ,C S p, I' h t h- • I elY' h Q(. d thgncgfor h c 1 �., �.::, s.�st.S .zr.'4t t,*'..:,.1,{.;';11"It:,.l,l.t��,.1rt �,r? ��� �' ,..:�� (r �r, �l.11� .,,.Y �♦��yfa,l.y .�,4;r< �. '3Herbert Grenchhene`ra t. �. . + s t I*. AMana9 ,, r a .r.•• iy, ,.` 4ry f 1 t $ uIOF y dli9r( J'n gf,,.BGBtQ d ayscesslon loxes, r :. t,i" yy yrr• :i:'4L a- ,1•'-TY•. t'••' :; 1,;y ti 'R,jr7j.. +� -✓ f,�l �S1s y .?,,t. 1• 41• :t .,t,l:,�:l,: y�+f.. ,,� r 1 ,y,'4 ,•s', ` it'4i': ,•1. ;Irr� N' A. A!f'M,',V•1.111�} $$ ,;i l,hr'.,' .!.' y. :r r; ar r :'r.='' t.t Aa,rr,• :} .� z,. <� ,. R�. t a,-..-Y ,3 `f, � / r• :..r. .t {�.� ,ar+'• .r i17. a ,ai! rq'�-, -} t . ,trr'i', f. , _J •1• L. :1 , +.} �t•� ta h .R n ► ro r: l7 r r 4n alL.6s> nol a rrtilfBd; 9.enter the V. unless in the resence n J`:•vi % +r .'!'+itr tt5 1:':1u,Nir-,, .j,., ,a,J i },(w li .i.. { 'f','prr P .. YQ,1�, .�t?tit<. �r./s ,('. ,. �"'P..["1:.�i,..l p t:', aL. Cral• Britton Asst:'G% 'M `r ��,°.rt4 . . , +Rr1.rs °. ,1r .1�l/.n�ktti , , �. t�, ,� ...��.�,I;,. �,.,, .1 ,,. t F i „ r, t d aft mp�,4 qe T refh}4 o permi+.m4fe t(tan•t o 'er;ons'to eater the vault a any one time;and f' •,,: :�l'• ,� i '- 4 :`!pl�,tr,, It: Y'r P.. .4'ti .a.'. ,..i �t� -•:.:t•' ., T': dt" 4•i'` .:KY,f,' 7:" r, �'` 'r;1a- , "♦ �`' .i i a• , } i r:a ' r,4 ,Td.,.,«P ,�Y ., , t,t ..,, :i '� S, ?+J `1J' :•f a guy e' II c a;o st cl m he,vqulf'Ion er th 's n C 's r fo n enin or closin `the box,and 'I r t. +,:•{ \ft z`(S t Y fp rr� y p'Q Q. q(i! 1� 1 fryf .�. Y f ,P 9 9 -.r. !h- wf'S:+'17` 1!', "'7,.r 3''','`� :<.�'[• 'i' ti ••',. :4' i{s°,Lt,R, i'i.}•: .�;5`a., P�� so Sj-' .a .�r,lrt..i.tr. Q' Jean 'Fiddes ;Adm'«Ser.v.ic S. M r ii}*:$ f, y xa. tr:•. ,l, :!.•: sY.✓., r,, ye slit ers FNil y elirb xes't0'room esks ro i'dedouiside , 5 N' ) e .. .,r :,. :. Sr5 f r.�`a".eE ,w..tJ.4 : S '" f ����)QY•:f.q f9. .h.,A 9n `I frE'r"s"J:.4y ..t +si . .I... ,.t,;a,vf l? . ,is rlc er :,r,. . . , .. ...tt ,t t , , • br(f;byon Qt_o,tp � s r,the Renter, e r ore i o'=r@ntersj or•other erson entitled ro a�cass,it,,-BankFURTHER RES0WED.iIndtlhe sortie;persons,acting m.the somerq rinser,}h611 hltye" uthorlty osig the Banks,f01e0se pn,a:' r ffi$. t , :,J . Y. ,,.f, .., ,°`r$i:, .I.1�.,,1,,,,.-,.4r (�, Pr;.Rt ,.. P t ;.F,E+s,+,;;r.:9v• '+: , ,,4 r11li• ht�8 lrw , •(,f t.de -1o�b11 f b tri be. ed=th n'a ces",t'"fh' box o b r ve ed b Bon until such o r V behol 'o his etirporciaon should lhis boi'be'svrrendered.. +,a•:y 11.••ty -+. /y t}p ••i•,.�r r1;., 2 ,{s ,l.r•r, }r i��71s S .h V. pPq!1 .E C ,4, f, v m.Y Q P e :P! Y If cf o l• _ '+.,+ e•w!,• `,d]t}=`p!+:•A.¢ti .)..r, } t,l`,. q`. .,L '.� 'iv....t'F:y,v... .cj,,,:✓ I,.,. •r .6,:.+ .r^ "' x•fr -9..4:, :r T_ T. .".i► ts�.+rL 1. Y roc i 1 'anovlle }l" F- .♦,, ...�- '7-•-•;a ]- t�, s r e 4� f.,,_,!_ ..t•+.r..•a�a+• .. .�:-,.-sa+:-•u '•`'"'� .1»../ ''°' 3` 1. '� '. .p .,!}�, � � 7i'.` :Y,�AA t' t 'Y sals,Gaisaar ��,,` ui. ai<aM1•t,.a.,.T� -a.,r ..i:T♦" ,.r.�.. ,:,, ,..,♦y. u,�'rt1,r,:r•• :l,'J. i, .3, _� ,..N:F3t;Tei r+Ih, 'kfti>.�L r 7 . r rt Lt C i 1.• 15 - d i E ..•-'t T' .,.t• T dRq ef,t l "I 1 io 6: t nl n I oLo b'az gt'd"f me or od us the rental'ote.. r..1: ;� ,vt .{. r.7.Fli.Yr�'• ,cc,r :;p!Int-�•:f( T Q. `'T/yy3� fl@-f��,F '�fn. t!0 ,•��7��4. 9rt !lY I f r -', , .'Ld....,!x„ . .,.Z1rE .i,eb,.,.�.. t ,tkr n ,.: ,, ¢, : .,=}•. h b r�'cPrri rh r he'a11��ov''is a fuq,'tr a on correct;rcopy;of q'resPit}flop;dul oddpted`b the Boord of Dlrector'of •.0 " a., ' > r ;off' ttp is mailed o e r f'lir'otherwise'deliver'd io •ti ter i "( Fri pen�'or1sv l Kod6i ah ({ Y' Y,;, �: �� ( hf S pl :f (�i'fy nJ{n0�e; f h d �r{F Q_r a f e Rent to his , S.r. r' 'J J V en"*... 'if.�':l-'7 sr.(,i.:.✓;.{'{{j.f'.'1. I,: J' �i .%ry.' J. t .V'14Ma�3+•r!:: �.•'r ''i.�t•e •l :f/• ,1. +�' ��- f - - - -- - p `�J o rneetitig f sold Board,.re ulorl hehon'`JdllUdr 2•'I't�^•at',i 'b -r y -Pvtti'r:ed�o x 1 31 - •� ce-District s, y ,Y r u. . n ReR�r ?�y r C1Y ?l:f�Pfeyeptohrve{Kept r' y tp i(lare.this agieemenr or chy t,ri e,upon written. ..�• ,'{,.i.:�'••'yl'r r? .k;•'n' +1. :i• Rj;,1 r :-!. r.:t T: o 3°�-�. <di� •.r,, :.j;� q . F Sl t�. , ',S, v: .w 1. :f., E,r 'nohc '.r0• k='wft u li v s� 'r ti� f , ,, ,,.r+•l ;,, ,:, 4. 4 ho r n� Vim"•:' , •i` '+ ty o,+' r,i f. Y'.•N , Ig.ai. .,• . T9— d th the si nofures appearing above sign 'of:flie eis n' d'ul ague on �_ ( f g A 9 0 a s { Zed•lo'Si o b hclf'o r � Ism. �tt --t�.'ar ry-:M, �., r•,- .sR Y,u:; r. t7s'ya. r e Q.. g, h . , * 9R !!„0 (: , , r?t _-1 nt I! a o d a �I ev nt a 1`�s�' I nt' e, ci k, o 'refuse access(o the boz' saidEvit4,en In accordance with th above resolutio ^t:4a.+ •t Lrary;rS, '.r'1i.r./1i+'' ..3:F!,r. :>• c !, Jh;r, c.�,� ``�.�?y �9IP.p.Y. b [�. f r,n h9., S: ,/,�'..t, ,!f(gs( h <B.n ��rt1, y r {•,•rtc n•�•t •',•.t,ri'i' `. '.t.; ''l•.f•,,,+,.,,` 1'.:,...,. !•} ' * b. •WwF"•Y•_}` ,l,Q X f .. d r 1 ' ITNE S m d the i t v�r+ °1`•t. g !+.;t.•dp, ••s••:+t�,:..v�it, a�Jf ;1 r.r: ,h4 ove vs-. Bf,ls, .(d. f e e 1 f'Jh b tf,a►.the xp rgfjon-of any!qrm or,v on the eorlier termination o;'.a 1(V S y hand and a seal of;a d faYfti,rs. t t- p rd / p ,ti rp+ f1 �, P 'T'o 'r 7' .•t•'t:,�Yl(:.Y ►rl - a� �'=<,IrlkrtK"r. ri„r,r? F- 'i a 1C}Vtx".4 f.'J " ,..,.. 'rr..y..,p. +y. +` j. p�f .4+^,i;:;j =i` y uc en�in § pd,sholl'faila ive'up psiQssio'n of the box,'fhe.Bonk shall have'�i ., X r, 1S. r,lC [eg[ig ,,e �. ► •g..P 4.9 P. Supersedes. Resolution No. 85-28 ,r - r* ;.♦ �..,- ,�. ,r,�. <a • ppr 1I 'VIM " .`•r sf',.14,y. li, J,7� .I•/:'c.i• `!1•.1 t, ',j.•..:,j, } t .cc .I kfi•�fOra,b':i1 + 1 , � , r• f+•- „l a•1,., •.!�1-,G �« .tr•: .r•''�iti'� <'+:' •7 (I► ft9h a0. r t?9 0� .P.fa4chf ent an for `ove an dis e f the'contents thereof of the lime and � �.1•we agree .n of h tfi of.'a , a �%�! "� , 4 i 'r+'' ,. 'K r.r> e / g lo. o .y.yot;of,r e;dco any person.having th¢"igh of'acce}s"to`}'otd x bw'for.^Yseeking oecei"offer tl+�i T %r., ;i,t rr1 n sc'b b o l 4t tr ,t.+ 4,�,•sid+ t ; (., ,G. g4 f: •4,. {, t.� { ,t. � h p n r Y� r #.. ).7;r. `.;• .a- :r•, .f.. ria)P -r a .,y',.+ ii•<l t ."5ti39+.r•F. �Ev- re .ny" .e. ti:. i.•ti.•i`.. •'` death S li th ei Y• 1. L...r. S�:ulr. «rY+ :;,'"•�= ' ,s �'"'•a• 'tF , 3�.q 1!t.. i,. �r ,! rK ) e o orp son.; :. , lr.a, •Y= ?:: ,'.fro 1, r. \t•'•Y,A, Y,r, + :t. J 3flk !: �.,• x �r x'v tSrk ' ,��$«,•.. �' It�t(1 r.:•,.. S "fi r r ,.a. , !: .1 YT, -n, .� tt f ,I1 •a Yr r: �,i 9:' h R t e: ox h f e' 'I• .a rS'r•. +it�1e{4r + a t �i,t' Q' 9l1 F,t r t1ui,4 d P� x i t q t 1 of r non a rli r t on th r af,into I t. ,4.Ib .a'o..S'StYt ,s•h'. .t.t,,..! .1, .v, tt t+�, ,:.,..Y ' 1'r Tr,, +t, !�Al �, �•„<.rF•r ;1 e:F,p ��: ,�.. ,m 4!qpo y a e erm,na+i e e s good^1 }' �. ,..,... ..,.: r.;..;, r.•.. ,,, •t �, tti';! , 't r•:,1+ �� : �1171EvS.. , The vndcrsigned horeby Tents the aboy'e numbored Safe Depq'tilt'Bo u61es1,►0'terrps.and Conditions' rime gn,the levers@' : <0 s(G,,af,w eq,r'enre p abl u ;ihoreof.onl ,excepietf;and play J on'd4mand to+he Bonk'tlie ex ense'of >, hereof on the r r .: I t(P p c :. t t' = <, ,• Ryr, .,. ..::•.M tr„y...r:�t. rq •nr.t. ,.,�,.,Y,.. ..P p tr, d on, a eve se of the current and ony sub¢equent,rpn�pl,feceipt.issvod 10.rha..underslgnad, to•whlch;rhs; ., ll .,, Y .mok(n 4f.repoirs.Os mq)pe,(ggnd red n Q{:ary,b4 the Rgnierrs own;'pr his age 1's apf or,`neglect including eosl }e' r�,',r , a•. t�..,rf yc .•..t,,., r, gl•., fM1. '.undersigned ogress:ReCeipt'of'a copy of the current'ren(oJ,recelptropd;of two keys to:;oid'Sofe Depcsit Bo; is hq►eby.«�}�; ., , ,,; { 0 1`k0 s:o (orpiri fuu'I(n Q a f one or 6prh'ke sore los Imm'di ten ice should be given to the Bonk. 1 acknowledged. 1 t }l, sy c *::•, r: ,,ic (:. rj; 91,•1,,. Y � ,, �p �.yy ryry I Y f, C P pf 9 ;r 9 :x.. rr /_, '•t„ L� L l f N.r 4. 1.; l.t l:i,'t' ,.•�P ed ed. rt r a- .t;: , N a ,� T. y Nr t, Y x� ( ••J\;4 4..•..i•. Lea +,d [. '"!".'-r+" ,T".< J,••�e 'sT-nln ,below;'rhQ;Rnmec'uik owl q es ha'In ''readafie a terms conifitio s and having `i' t �' ;,,.,.., ., ,. �,. t'1-r 1 y 9. .9 n g v, g s s n n g Tece ved a copy t.The Bonk*/is no►outhorized to charge the'pom any.eheckln •gCequhf q, �'h;' F'"t ^'r''' "a1'•r".• %°'ar'",,,"-t/or ; ! '�:' ,te '.thee of,'I nd hereby a tees o L `bo'nd`b th se terms and condition 'ond an''subse uent amendm nt r r ' I;} P, 9 a.. I, rra :4.J(, f a}' Y 9 ! ,v p Y g Y 9 e stheeoas r 'rl i1, if/+1 r4, rent on sold sots deposit. when due !.. 11.'•• y 7 1. w :' ^:' , ` �J, P ,!` ,'''l. ,� ':�.. t' r sa for�h::in'the,ienjof rec-ij'r'y n on said`box r `•t •.�' t _ \ .'a `S �,\, yE. , .f• /!'` r.'• >'.. 'L' ,�, P. �., L iy, '�d7T`. i.,. :ly •.1, .V � .,�1+42' ''t/' -.1�• .lr+@•i:r. F 1t'C ,3 rr.:...,. � ,t •v,: ,� r•. '� (( ,-:e,r,f r -�'c:• ,v.: M ..i• i,. J•i:�it;Y.'r+. { •}•r, ^^ -1 rti' °�.7, ,♦. •4; aJ:: .r:41,r. r ♦ �I? .il r-. .,. s: • '(r Fi' t c. u•. •�'r.: t :.' �' :•, T ob a r, :sr f r i, r t :tr 3R1Y.,. ? :t ;t 9':Q• •1. 'rl• ."t,_ •t{ E,.rit Mid eninsu]a Re Tonal. 0 r.: Y , � •"> rl -'. {, L Y{� a r. .�,rf:" i<,•,:•••...a,.l�( EBRf'Oft,4 t'.' `• is: + +s x. E:.f �.,1'6_Y •r'Z tr,�7>rt't: 1`?1.�''�,;5 i�.,r.�'fr.R� r''�t`3��,t „r�j� ` 1 { r p 9_ pen 'S� I , r. .a ,l- r 't, '.«- ,.R V :rT,•. f,. „r• �f�e"y" �n+� [,:,• rr.';,! ,.� F `' 43 ,.. 7 t.,t. ,.."t.l' ,4rrt,.•t,• r. ?. It ,, -,ar Z {. .:(�+-n:i 'aK�t-'7I:!� ,�,,-, , .L�t• �:e'' .ti a{- til•, :•r :."'.i, 4r' � k"Ef'n} -r. .a. :,, .t.r s ,.rr.(`" s .B•• >< r- s:• ,f- •�s'. ^,' .t r. .t''• lit` J y, i all\. S• r•r•1 ••.i"+. �. 1 ',," ....7k�' •r �� .:;•'4. •r l: �4'.r� ,"1- .:� t� :�^,,'r!i r ti•f:f!p.. "+, 'i. tik � 'S;f , ••�• t' •,. 'l. •n�- .r [• rf�rr r••.: Y ��- '�- : 'BY� - + ?ir 4. '�. '�,:, .t .5,. ,. '$,., .v4t rl �� 1�•�6�.'yW� A i '',. J'3r#r k/ ,J .!y'cii. •�( ..l f..Y F, jj -.ff, ,.}..J�' '+•*••�^;:' `��i, �•+,. �,. ��F .G..�'Nk?•'tMi'fKl't. •�4�„'•!`9:,;•:c� tiff../.�?�ic-]., f ti,,,. btJ,'"t..r •v ;r, y y. .,.t',+ •11T E , ,xf,. r, f � •••.:•.> � , I �� .�• t r _,. "Y: _t; !; (:: !` ~::r, • `` 1. 't ,+'4+' ] �S�GtJHI I'FE t. t .•�c. "t:.. ,g r: I{,�� °,k.` .P l�r.,1• di. 'l. y+ �a-.i• .Y+ ...,.�!•" ..} ••\. ,i,,l.i' t t' ,•.t i ',s• .C~f'}�S__ 4, .l't '. �' �•t. .r' , 1," i..Ir .; •,a:, ^.,'.t:r:N:i.,, 10 �. .fN �".k ,;1. .4 r. •R"�` Yt .;41T,: .l +M ,.y^ 2: r. rD _ •ti• ,;. '�,' , r .f ':i?. r '��' .�: c.,��,'''. .,.i^';+,&.. lt�t� a,. •1:', .`! � t' ,,' t ", :,, i�'.itJ•. ,A ./- rr.T ., <" i a -,"•E, .,l'F" `.3?. {{ :, r -:r {� ♦ . ;, ^1'PIS t :.',.' �1• _s _,..tau _al• ::F... , '+C. l�. ._ .r ,[ 4T,aa'.: Y� a a{-•,� b�l.• t •t t f.•"•:i:' w; .r.'i Af'�+s(-�' sL. s�:^�. - y{ DIY +xy' •.3 'v' o r" t-yys.�'l.r^.,�( C .;w-" - v F.« .7•. 1'+ t - ;v, �.,1`•;..",�r',y •�:; 1,- '{,t `(+}• .�. :'R'Yt •1.^, !ri ;-), :atrlilEt tts ys?rr•: ,:} %PAtf •♦ (!t,;T., ,,a.. "'•ii •i -y'•ti'' !'' ,� r i'�- c •, :+"' +• 1Gt1AtURE�- S 4.' $ F'" GNAIURE s; ,• tf:•4 :.r ,s ,l ;T �y:•,•,;- r• h ti Y 1' 41' L 5 :is 1 i. .f::`.:t't r•f �. f "E` !`.•. J.ytl: •<.'y „ .1:1 r_►; .F •:rai,+`if')i%f=''1 .it..: � :�, j 'v+' -.S S •'�il:�y �. '� >{ .' •c: 'rf' :! �.lr♦. S r C., ri. i. .,1.•,' y},:�+;:lut-'s'q,.7, ,,.'t'',? ,�•Y'r"�f� f, ;j'. yF' �{ t.'. `i` l'`�`',i \•,� r .l 4 _l fi. ',;SU RENDER OF SAFE DEPOSIT DAT 4 N E a t ' 1 t5�?:tE7e,. s. ya.r,• L� erg<?JA}rt�t`:r .fG .+ .j. -3 r. , '•a )if,' 1 1 w. -,+!• •y, w rtl :A r `.l'.,•• ,�,+, :.r. , •`, •�nr;,ta,. 4' tvl :�r.,r)1 J:i°. r•1 x.., K{U�::t• ,)F•:t., �•' .�,ET ;•.(/vJo hore b certify thatbll property lace in th6 boy rlumberodsale da o It as been dui an taw U I L't r,}f+r: ru MIM, .. vRF � t !,F(IGiJA1URFY Y P P h P d 0 P„ .�oK`h Y �. x kf; tr r�.ti 3 t ,1t 1t1withdrawri''thty of F;rst Interstat 8atkalifrniihee(ors: er al a"s d slid dlschai e�a i�t,•� f ',tJr.• r -(.t.>i n ,`i' J e, F.;!•`r.,.�r`.:r^,i y,,..4 .I ':ram ,r.:f. .nJ�:, ,} 't .., ,(f' i •r` J ,, it i ,. .�:s5,t .\Y'W. •,.,. �-itr: t '{;k•�,:• ��'/ .ar,ti:rl.t=,, .r .r � - - •}, Y ,.,( .f ,. �1 r'. ,y ..:c+i.t tit .. r: C.0 rir' •"::'1 , '4f,,."s „ IG RE !'� :^4. _ :t �r -{ir._, Tjt t("1 i, c4 ( 7►�r'�r i``t`1S: k" ii:' ,1.• s .J , t,+ ,j.'.r.++:.Y. �� 4:• r+. „,i}', i l •t €,yr.d ./i. ,.�r .'K.� 1 �. S. .r. !,' e =a +'r`..b' r 'f 'l,r:,.!if•.,••.. 'f''' a'i+.. ', 'W , S, i:ta,. , #• �Kii �. S• ;y': d, +,SD•119 7/81' t 08TA4NSIGNATUR[tS) +{P ERj r •�'-'i V r,.tya,.,r.=:Vy'. (, f,pr, &} t:•• tr i3 r ( t ,t > e , t? r t Q E 3 >t1CfS t i ;+a�.._ :,�•. SAFE DEPOSIT BOX CONTRACT DATE RENTED BOX NUMBER CORPORATION ' ' t ` < "} v '� ti�s# `(,� •,,,r:� r � f E Iv p� ,-�-.t �� !'A.' SIANMCONDItIONSyOF RENTING A SAFE DEPOSi BOX' �. p� bs , 1. r. N•WotE Of GVicrVRFtttt7tr'f�IU l ( �en aAIE •i SC t , , uiJx, :f� 7t, : Mi dpeni nsul a Regional Open Space: District : +;r�` ��1_ THIS PARAGRAPHf LIMITS THE BANK'S LIABILITY. BANK IS A BAILEE FOR HIRE AND.IS OBLIGATED ONLY TO USE`F STREET ADDRESS - _ I I^ � rY{{ � ORDINARY.CARE'l N,PREVEN TING THE.OPENING OF A SAFE DEPOSIT BOX BY ANY UNAUTHORIZED PERSON,AND., _ -CrTY } ;!• 11P ETE [165-471 ElEP110NE P i I 1: - �. B�;t IT, 15 EXPRESSLY AGREED'THAT THE BANK SHALL BE UNDER.NO,FURTIIFR LIABILITY TO RENTER WITH RESPEC6, 375 Di s'tel Circle,'-Suite D-1 Los` Al tos l ,CA 94022 7 3 • ' 7 THERETO.THCOPENING,of A BOX,AYANY UNAUIHORIZED PERSON SHAI.L NOT BE PRESUMED FROM THE LOSS^ pS p1 N - ANY PROPEOTYAlLEGEDIY DEPOSITED'IN THE BOX,IF INSURANCE PROTECTION IS DESIRED ON THE CONTENTS p „ flE iv 0. tion o. 8� f, ,. ;, r ,, EI ai c at a safe deposit ox shall rented 'n 'rst Inter ate{aC� f'CI f rate in acgordance with`the terms 8nd �>:, rf, r Zr OF,THE DdXI Ij i5 SUGG. >lEd TFIAT THC REtJTER CONTACT AN INSURANCE COMPANY. pR ,n,�t: } conditins prescribed by said Bank,and that •` (�1�nLleHi� — retetyaad,ce r be a d the �'!'"j ,The Boater ix un 'other• rr son'dul aurhori,zCd h Renter or low(such'as a legal representative of ilte renter. Y J' d aEt ,5 y, I � Y Y g N I, t are(he is)hereby authorized to sign the Bank's regular;corm of contract�n behalt,gt lhi�cocgouaslwt. T C �geney � ;rri up on,prescnl�tiori iif'proper idenlrlicoi;on and upon establishment of right of access to Bankss satisfaction,shall,.' FURTHER RESOLVED that access to said sale deposit box No 1495''�f+ T A^ +,i�r _ fl !,: I i `t d E Lo$ H0$ fi r' have access to the,box in Ihe 8onk's vauhs during Banks business hours established from time to time,subject lot L T OFFICE,First Interstate Bank Of California shall'be town 't�' ' r '' ' %6` Z . �irtr the terms grid coeditioris contained herein,; ; v'.< one <;.•,,,trM.of►hffol( '1np.Jointly �y:tlT "-rt h�?'1Zyrta 1,,',^;1 1- „r,".>,p; .,.•r;v c4,y=+au� `a ii`1 3 The Renter,shall not use liar, box r or,lierm;1 the box to be used for the deposit of any liquid or property of on l TYPE NAMES - - StcNAruRE:•et••. -.r;� ,�C' )' sty ,,+�, rlwexplosiyei,dangerous.or c Ifen sive noture,lor'ony property the possession of which is prohibited by low air publics., ' "'•* t'^�` xOlt •,rs + ,t r :'=�"iregularion or which rnoy become a nuisonce:.to the Bonk or to any of its renters.if the Bank has reason to believe'. i Edward G."°'Shel l e "' Pre's 7 dent r I Tt`t 02 54 irt,:that:the Renter, de os,redr'o'r. ,•umilted to-be de osited.within the box on item ros ribcd in the r }}• lr.,, ti!}c P I P Y P t preceding E,, r I �,,i>r+,• ttP� * r,P M to sentence,Ike,Bank shall t},r,4 have the right without prior notice to the Renter to forcibly open the box and remove A.'H'and inventor the contents. }f 2 J=.rnesttnEs 11• HeriSha`.r , PAS x Y i1 .,.. }fJ,Yi y7•,} l.i, [ , 7�C� ., .. ,. -;.;; .� r,;, ;, ,,: s F,_;r s ••r r� . s {,1 rl�ar'In the.ev2nt of,the.deolh of do person I,ovm access to the box,the'survivin person or persons also entitled to t. .. .c:, � 1 �..,t'_ , �. Y /f ,��'yro i r t i `rl 1 � S 'r,� .,; s r>� >.� .�.� � � "d - Y I 9. 9 P I " y fvi {�'°�4It r �'?�-�`ocEe'ss shall notil .the Bonk litirriediniel o such death,'and,thenceforth,access to the box shall only be allowed s Herbert Grench General' Mena er ,.,zr:i, ,/ f,; . r T y..:,,, y Y + t % l �. �y igi.pursuant ib the Iawss rules avid legulations relating to inheritonce and succession loxes. , a L' : Cra i Britton' AS s t. Gen M r "!'�' ' z +;..`S s'The Rentei;'or.,pjo eYt ents,or:represenlotives,wBl not be permitted to enter the vault unless in the presence ' 9 g t. P,.{� ,., tt' s oF-o�Bank enipioyee:Th!Donk'may refuse to permit more thou iwo persons to enter the vault of any one time,and 1 ,; r'' �, ft ' :may refuse to allow such iiI,, sons to reinatn in Ihe vault to 9ei than,is necessary for opening or closing the box,and• or sJean H ,Fiddes;AdrnServices M r T � � — l i r' ; y , r !may'requ re such persons•Io 2arrr their ilexes to rdoms or desks provided outside. i s t r,i ct, U I e r e r."� :,, � : v'FURTHER R , k lT 7: r Xlt•.. _ r •�1 <klti`-' { RESOLVED that Ihe same persons,pcung in the some mpnq r;•aj7 I.h ve,: uthority to:slgr�the Bo k's lea a nr',' b II by any act of;or process against,the'Renter one or more co-renieri,or other person entitled to access,the Bank behalf of this corporation should this box bv' urrendergd r;t1�. f Iti : 't Istt .' iP >r : ` 'hti°;��ci;�9. s:^'.. +` ti y 3. 9 w i�,g r ±I,Y •. y 11,,r, :.�• a r J�• .i0orbldden to allow IhP bf,x to be openld,"then access to the box may be prevented by Bonk until such act or,t t { .)� �r; r� iW ,t r process is annulled.'s ;�,. �•t,,.stM+',-rY.-Pt>a�+-r>t'*.•n+.W'r•;4 $"r`rtw'�� ..•r.��; :,`,, 3,rw,tl.r,�1., t,-. � i aIts.. ..4x a;J �. ....$ i —I. h 'rl I,t I t i - y .,^,.z .t , •'Si..'1 r rs', 7. a BonMrreservest e g u i rrtdnate-tl e-Tenting and p'nssais on of t5 Ise r atZTsq time ana udiusr the rental yore 1 Greby certify That e o eve is a ful4 tr}{e and correct co • of'o re'solution'.du � f Inl dpen n$u4 . e I one I U en pY �Y,°d°pfled:by fhe'Baord of Directors of , K �`j t, at the expiration of any Ierfii,' Mori its nblrcE mdrled to the riddress of,or otherwise delivered to,the Renlei;to his. 9 P ar o t„eetin or said Januar 22'„ ,., .i!:. aCe"a�$'t-rrC ,, , , , . , y, e .Y „T sentahve Renicr mdy term role Ihis ciyrecment,at any time,vpon•written '9 t:gularl held ,�o-: �~: authorized.agent,or;lo any,legal repre 19 '_ nd t ': i. < i notice to Dank,withoul.ru�l I dF, efund �r Pat the signatures a pp earirtg''obove dare the signolures of the persons'dul 'authorized to�si n on behalf o ::t'" �'���-��'' � - r:,�' - i said CP11 rt, w In accordance with th b ve re olurion y 9 f r'+ii�'a 8 All reniols are o oble'in 6 Ybnce In th'e event the rent is de'in uenl,the Bank mo refuse access to the box until'S P, Y q y l WITNESS my hand and the seal of soid�,..,'. , T " ^ t'P4ai^. v r r i F lh' evil'i`f h :i ' l f p, — _ __ w "; f, wr )he o e due. ertl'Is,pa d. I e R e o yt a bo al t tc expirol ono any term of upon the earlier Carr irnotion cis t ,� T, .. SU er$ d •rfr 7 t,_s_ a —C1 irk , ,�. }: r.above•prov(ded.shall not renew such'renling and shall fail to give-up possesiion of the'box,Ihe Bank shall have':i p e es Resolution Nth:;� 85-28 .,:� -� , . . ,'., }; * �} . 1 we agree to notify o s" ' .Tl+,fk�' rY' +ahvi'r,> the'right to forcibly op'tn the kiox of such,Rcnier and to remove and dis ose of the contenti Thereof at the time and ` 9 y you of the death of any person having ih righ,q(,p efs _,iol box before seekfn. access after t e GwN'b'"t`r" r. r ' a I. •`*.• ? P I. N. .,.rFS., tP. .h tt, death of such other persona ? yJ " t7igh.{ .m the manner prescribed by lout): y n yf !.• 1 s )„'r i; ' ,z'+, I •J:. .t r.;t's�$rti.,^,,,ar 4�h,r < :Er ..1., ' y C. f_r )• e. .trt•Tiy!.k -y'-• r,� ; i.` �' t t' ..C•,i. :"'Tj �,- The Renter will iurrendcr:'tiie bok of the ex'Irdtioli.of the Icrm oru' .on 'di' rrnr a n•her `.+ t,The undersigned h reb ants h b "'y' ^ys' gr'.' ; ,, . P pan y,ca,cr,te na o t . Caf;.1ir{as good 9 4 Y r i e a ove numbered Safe Deposit Bax sub �o terms and condltionsprinted on the reverie �Yr T*Fyt" 1:' t; order os when rented'reasairablo u�eil�ilf` o') lezce'ted'on ''o u'ion demon t ifs Bon N, x' e o r C,}• n y„ p d p, y ( d o e D e expense of hereof and on'the'reverse of the Current and any'subsequenl'rental reCplptIssued 'to'the.undersigned, to which the' : ' r,'';•�f1"Ic " + "' ''• "T'''•"t• ;.undersigned agrees. Receipt'of a copy of the current rental receipt and of iwo ke s'to"aid Safe De osit Box is hereby '�'Xti;t",r:tm0king all repairs as may be reridererd nece3thry 'y Ihb Realer s own,or.his oyent's act or negleU,Including cost;' acknowledged. r Y P [[!s z.tit.Ny,:r of lost keys and forcinq.f ee' If necessary Il'bnq or both keys arc losi,immediate imrice,should be given to the Bonk.;1 {4 1, y j , , By,s y g below, Ihe:Renner ucknow�etlges loving read IIICSC terms and Conclitions and Navin received a co • The Banky/is not outhariied to charge If a company checking account No.' {ar . "� g copy rent on said safe deposit box,when due ; ',thereof,;and hereby agrees to be'�ound by ifiese terms and corrdiGons,'and any subsequent.amendments thereto as' r %at r Visit forth in life renitll receipt coveriny,sdid box Mid eninsula' �vl.�`A1�,. y , ; r;t v, p Regional 0 e� n Space District 4. i G E$ i' IN r ' :. - , �]y .t>•• ''fEt .i'd.. ,gt 1Y7 :,.i��Mr �- r +Er1 .•t F,,�Pt•r-: E% :1 . ,y;,.1 r�1'..' i•r:YL�s .,r BY •a� ,,.• II ..3 ,.'rJ` k. , f, ff Tf•;fir, {{ r G• �''..,.tit��,, �a..\�•A.•r:d,.1.'J,.f. :'tr�i r...r.�'. •.n��� rt'gl'r �}` !f pxJff• a. t -$10 SIGNATURE r' 'i +T, It^'ryTtla SECNr SIGNATURE SURRENDER OF SAFE DEPOSIT DOX r >�• yr'.@ err , t t O DATA_ --,— i'' �) yr I/we heieby`certify thit'all property placed in the above^numbered safe de osit Ilex has bee dui Eind11 f I aT•I r , ,;rSIGNATURE P n y aw u ly. 1 sI,N . withdrawn therefrom:all IiabiEty of Fi(St Interstate Banc of California therefor iEi hereby reloased and discharged. a :- S.Gr+Mu I SIGNATURE. SD;119 7/81 f OBTAIN SIGNATURt(S)Oil kEvIkSE ------ M-86-02 (Meeting 86-03 January 22, 1986) 'Moo, MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 7, 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: M. Foster, Controller SUBJECT: Renewal of Investment Authority Discussion : My authority to invest temporarily idle funds expires on January 21 , 1986 according to the provisions of Resolution 85-01 (see memorandum M-85-05 dated January 7 , 1985). The District continues to benefit from the ability to maintain its own direct investment program. Recommendation: I request that you extend my investment authority for another year by adopting the attached resolution. The investment goals and guidelines are the same as you adopted on January 23, 1985 except for the reference to the 1985 Note Fund in guidelines #2 and #3. � RESOLUTION NO. � RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENJNSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT � AUTHORIZING CERTAIN BOARD EMPLOYEES TO INVEST TEMPORARILY IDLE FUNDS IN SECURITIES ALLOWED BY GOVERNMENT CODE WHEREAS, the District needs to maximize its yield on temporarily idle funds in order to help meet land acquisition objectives; and WHEREAS, Government Code, Sections 53630 et seq. authorize the District to invest inactive funds in securities currently yielding interest rates higher than the Santa Clara County Fund; and WHEREAS, the District can improve its yield on temporarily idle funds � � without sacrificing financial safety or flexibility; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: � Section One. The Board Of Directors of the MidpeninSula Regional Open � Space District does hereby authorize the Controller, Or in his/her absence, a District employee authorized by the Board to act on his/her behalf, to invest temporarily idle funds according to the Investment Goals and Guidelines attached hereto as Exhibit »8" and by reference made a part hereof. � Section Two. Before any particular investment the Controller shall � consult with the General Manager, or a District employee authorized to act in his/her behalf, to determine anticipated cash flow Deeds Of the District. � Section Three. This Resolution supersedes Res[Hution No. 85-01 adopted � January 23, 1985. This Resolution shall no longer be in effect as of January 21 , 1987, unless extended in time, and inactive funds Shall then be deposited in the � Santa Clara COWMtv commingled 'investment fund' ^ January 1986 EXHIBIT "A" Investment Goals and Guidelines GOALS Goal 1 . Capital Preservation Temporarily idle funds shall be invested in a conservative manner such that funds can always be withdrawn at, or just above or below, full invested value. Investments that offer opportunities for significant capital gains and losses are excluded. Goal_ 2. Liquidity Temporarily idle funds will be managed so that normal operating cash needs and scheduled extraordinary cash needs can be met on a same day basis. Investments will be sufficiently liquid to provide a steady and reliable flow of cash to the District to insure that all land purchases can be made promptly (within two weeks) . Goal 3. Income Temporarily idle funds shall earn the highest rate of return that is consistent with capital preservation and liquidity goals and the Government Code. GUIDELINES 1 . Determination of Idle Funds The Controller will prepare a complete cash flow projection prior to all investment decisions. This cash flow projection will be reviewed and evaluated by the General Manager. The General Manager is responsible for designating the maximum amount of funds available for investment. 2. Contingency Reserve . A contingency reserve of between $500,000 and $2,000,000 shall be maintained with the Santa Clara County Treasurer. The General Manager is responsible for determining the size of this contingency reserve: At all times this contingency reserve will be sufficient to satisfy the requirements for the 1982 and 1985 Note Funds. 3. Non-Invested Funds Idle District funds not otherwise invested or maintained with the 1982 and 1985 note paying agent will be deposited with the Santa Clara County Treasurer. 4. Selection of Investments The Controller is responsible for selecting specific investments that fit within the amounts and maturities designated by the General Manager. The Controller is also responsible for directing security transactions. 5. Investment Instruments Investments shall be limited to those allowed by the Government Code. Investments shall not be leveraged. 6. Diversification Investments other than insured or collateralized deposits at banks and savings and loan associations shall be diversified. Exhibit "A" Page two 7. Marketabili For investments other than deposits , the breadth of ownership and number of securities outstanding will be sufficient to establish a secondary market in which investments can be readily converted to cash without causing a material change in their market value. 8. Acceptable Banks Bankers ' Acceptances and Negotiable Certificates of Deposit may be purchased only from banks and savings and loan associations with over $1 ,000,000,000 of deposits and reporting profitable operations. 9. Acceptable Collateral Securities collateralizing bank or savings and loan deposits must be rated "A" or higher. 10. Investments in Name of District All investments purchased shall stand in the name of the District. 11 . Reporting The Controller shall report all security transactions to the Budget Committee no later than the next Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors after any transaction has been made. The Controller shall submit a complete listing of the investment portfolio to the Budget Committee by the fourth Wednesday of each month. 12. Purchase of Securities Through Bank The Controller is authorized to purchase securities through the investment department of the District's bank. The Bank shall be instructed in writing only to purchase securities in the name of the District and that all matured funds shall be returned to the District's bank account. The Bank shall also be instructed to send receipts for transactions to the General Manager. 9iw► ..a MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: F.Y.I. DATE: January 22, 1986 i MEMORANDUM January 16 , 1986 TO: All Staff FROM: C. Britton, Land Acquisition Manager r ` SUBJECT: Mailing Address for New District Office Headquarters For future reference, the District' s new nailing address will be as follows: Mi.dpeninsula Regional Open Space District Old Mill Office Center Building C, Suite 135 201 San Antonio Circle Mountain View, CA 94040 I i I W MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: F.Y.I. DATE: January 17, 1986 y�>bae�a MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 375 DISTEL CIRCLE,SUITE D-1,LOS ALTOS,CALIFORNIA 94022 (415)965.4717 August 16 , 1986 Honorable George Deukmejian Governor State of" California State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Deukmejian: The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District has voted unanimously to support strongly SB 806 , authored by Senator Presley. The Community Parklands Bond Act of 1986 would provide $100 million per capita grants to cities , counties , and districts for park j and recreational facilities. The past State bond acts for parks have done so much towards pro- viding public facilities in this area. This District, for example, has used bond act funds towards the Los Gatos Creek Park acquisi- tion in Los Gatos, the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve acquisition in the Los Altos area, the Purisima Creek Open Space Preserve development project along Skyline Boulevard, the Coal Creek Open Space Preserve acquisition and the Monte Bello Open Space Preserve acquisition. Yet the demand for new facilities continues to increase. We are extremely grateful for your strong support of .the previous park bond act and respectfully request your support for SB 806 . Sincerely, r Herbert Grench HG:ej General Manager cc: Senator Presley AROSD Board of Directors Ralph Heim, California Advocates Jack Harrison, California Park and Recreation Society Herbert A.Grench,Genera!Manager Board of Directors:Katherine Duff Nonette G.Han ko Teena n Y He show Richard S.Bishop,Edward G.Shelley,Harry A.Turnar,Danie l G.Wendin r MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 375 DISTEL CIRCLE,SUITE D-1,LOS ALTOS,CALIFORNIA 94022 (415)965-4717 January 9 , 1986 Ralph Jaeck Assistant City Manager City of Mountain View 444 Castro Street P.O. Box 7540 Mountain View, California 94039 Subject: Permanent District Headquarters Dear Mr. Jaeck: Several months ago we met in your office to discuss the possi- bility of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District acquiring the vacant city-owned property at the southwest corner of Bailey Avenue and Latham Street. The District would be very interested in acquiring this site as a location for its permanent office headquarters. I was very encouraged by this meeting, as I am the District Board member who represents the area that includes the City of Mountain View. I also reside in the City and have been actively interested in the City government and its policies. It is my personal belief that locating the District office head- quarters in Mountain View offers tremendous advantages to both agencies. It seems that Mountain View with its Shoreline Park and strategic location on the Peninsula is more and more gaining a reputation as the regional center of the area. Typically Palo Alto, mainly because of Stanford University, has assumed this role. However, I feel this reputation is slowly shifting; however, one of the most important questions includes the future of the downtown area of Mountain View. The District is a regional agency (the current boundaries extend from San Carlos to Los Gatos and the center of the Bay to Skyline Boulevard) and as more public open space land is acquired, the District' s function becomes more popular and the recreation services more desired. Certainly the baylands and foothills significantly contribute to the desirability of the area. The City and the District have had several cooperative efforts including the very successful Deer Hollow Farm at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve and the bay access project at Stevens Creek (Shoreline Park) . I feel that it would be highly desirable for the District Board to choose Mountain View as a permanent office headquarters location. j 1 Hertsert A.Grench,Genera!Manager Board of Directors:Katherine Duffy,Nonette G.Hanko,Teena Henshaw,Richard S.Bishop,Edward G.Shelley,Harry A.Turner,Daniel G.Wendin Ralph Jaeck January 9 , 1986 Page Two As to the particular site, the low-key nature of our office building (approximately 12 ,000 sq. ft. in a split-level design on a 37, 000 sq. ft. parcel) would readily blend the high traffic of Bailey Avenue with the adjoining residential area to the west. The site is located adjacent to a local bus line and bus stop and the intersection is signalized with left turn and U-turn capability. Bailey Avenue has similar existing and contemplated institutional type uses such as the Mountain View Academy and the PAL facility. This site is directly across from the area of the old Mountain View High School that is to become a city park and I understand that the City may be building a new fire station in this area. It is- very important that the District offices emulate the purposes for which the District was formed. Therefore it would be our plan to heavily landscape the site and have a "park-like" setting. This goal would dictate our design and relate well to the boulevard type of. approach the City is already maintaining for Bailey Avenue in this area. We would also be very concerned about the residential neighborhood to the west and would -there- fore treat the rear property line with fencing (or wall) and landscaping that would provide screening and sound proofing as well as improve aesthetics. Our preliminary drawings also indicate that we will be able to provide a greater than average setback to further insulate the adjoining uses. Since the most appropriate building area on the site also fronts on Latham Street, we would also be very careful about the exterior impres- sion so that the office would blend with the adjoining residen- ti.al development. Currently, this location appears to be the first choice of the entire Board and I see it as an excellent opportunity for both agencies. I would appreciate it if you would keep me informed on the prospects of continuing to pursue such a project and be sure to let me know if there is anything I can do to enhance the potential of success. Sincerely, C is Edward Shelley ES:cac cc: James Zesch, Mayor Glen Gentry, Planning Director Allen Shelley, Public Works Director Steve Unangst, Zoning Administrator John Kirby, Property Agent MROSD Board of Directors ✓ PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST 3000 SAND HILL ROAD MENLO PARK,CALIFORNIA 94025 (415)854-7696 January 7 , 1986 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Robert Augsburger Sheldon Brenner Pat CoMoton Mr. William S. Briner, Director David L Fletcher Vince S Garrod State Department of Parks and Recreation Christy Holloway Federal Grants Section Melvin B. Lane Grants Administration Office David W Mitchell F Ward Pane P.O. Box 2390 Rosemary Young Sacramento, CA 95811 ADVISORY COUNCIL Marilyn Alberding Dear Mr . Briner: Eleanor Boushey Rober*V Brown On behalf of the Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve William H Clark Dorothy Comstock Advisory Committee I am pleased to offer support for Sue Crane the recent grant application submitted by the Laurence Dawson Herber J Dengler Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. J. Phil DiNapoli Phylks Draber The grant application under the California Park Clarence J. Ferran. Jr and Recreational Facilities Act of 1984 reauests Thomas W Ford John Freidenrich funding of $392 , 500 for a major portion of Phase I Clarence Heller development of the Skyline Ridge Master Plan. The Mrs,William R Hewlett Lots Crozier Hogle plan was developed as a cooperative effort between Ellie Huggns the Open Space District and Peninsula Open Space Trust Mrs Denn,s B.King with funding support from the San Francisco Foundation, Robert C Kirkwood Richard the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the Henry C Live rmore Robert W McIntyre J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Anthony P Meier Greg Meicnor James E Mitchell For almost two years the POST Skyline Ridge Open Gordon E Moore Space Preserve Advisory Committee has worked with Mrs Albert J Moorman the consultants and the District staff on the plan. Alan Nlc"o!s George S, Nolte The committee is comprised of individuals who have Paul 0 Reimer extensive community involvement and recreational Constance M.Ridder interests in the uses of open space. The committee Barbara Doyle Roupe William F Scandling has made a careful study of the Preserve and has been Fritz Snideman the catalyst for public input in the planning process. Geraldine F Steinberg Williarr)DWalsh In November 1985 , the Advisory Committee assisted Susan S Ware in the planning of a "Day at Skyline: which brought 22 environmental educators on the site to elicit their expert opinions on the proposed development. There is a strong mandate that opening this site will have a positive impact on environmental education and recreation in our local communities . Mr. William S. Briner January 7 , 1986 Page 2 The Skyline Ridge Advisory Committee is now hard at work developing Master Plan brochure, signs and a habitat management plan for the Alpine Lake area. There is a commitment to raise $24 ,000 toward the construction of an observation deck or blind at Alpine Lake, the Master Plan signs and brochure, as well as , trail development at Alpine Lake and construction of picnic facilities. The award of this grant from the State Department of Parks and Recreation is key to opening this site for both recreation and education. With the aid of this grant, the public private partnership created during this planning process will be strengthened. In particular the opportunity for private sector funding and volunteer involvement will be enhanced when the area is more readily available to the public. Enclosed are articles from the POST' s publication "Landscapes" and a recent article from "The Country Almanac" which describe the planning process. Thank you for your kind attention in this matter. Sincerely, Christina A. Holloway Chairman Skyline Ridge Advisory Committee CAH:paf Enclosures cc: Robert Augsburger aferb Grench M-86-04 (Meeting 86-03 January 22 1986 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 10 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: Special District Board Management Institute Attached is a brochure regarding the Institute. If any of you wish to go, I suggest you bring the matter before the Board, in accordance with your Rules of Procedure, at an early date for authorization of expenses. SPECIAL DISTRICTS MANAGEMENT SEMINARS In cooperation with CAUFORNLAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION invites You 4L-0 Join a group of your fellow Special Dlst-i4ict Directors and Managers in San Diego at the U.S. Grant Hotel on February 28, March 1 and 2, 1986 for v"'kOARv"L MANAG"EMENT - 1h "11"HE"' ;t:":`0'PEw"C*A'1AL ID141015'"FRIC"I"" This intensive weekend of seminars is devoted to Special District Board level management concerns and will be attended by Special District Directors, Trustees, Commissioners and Managers from all parts of California. For the newly elected or appointed Director, the Institute offers an effective and efficient way to become better acquainted with new responsibilities. For the experienced Director, it provides a refresher and update. For both, it is a once-a-year opportunity to broaden horizons by contact with fellow Directors from other Special Districts. Most of all, the weekend away from the daily demands of your workaday world gives the opportunity for reflection and planning for the forthcoming term. Five in-depth seminar sessions and two special presentations deal with those areas which Special District Board members themselves have identified as critical. The accent is on practical and useful information you can take away with you and put to work immediately. . .and it is still the only program of its kind in the country dedicated solely to the information needs of Special District Directors, Managers and Staff. The weekend format has been designed with the Special District Director's schedule in mind. It means minimum time away from your weekday responsibilities. You can arrive Friday morning and be home Sunday evening. A feature of the Institute is the complete and comprehensive Director's handbook, which each participant receives, and which contains a myriad of legal and other reference material, forms, sample documents, and complete outlines and notes which make the handbook useful long after the Institute is concluded. The Institute is offered in cooperation with California 1 Districts Special 'a t P p c s Association by Special ecial Districts Management Seminars, exclusively devoted to quality training and education for Special Districts. i Program Sch elide Friday, February 28 1985 8:30 - 10.30 a.m. Regi stration and Check-In 10:30 - 1 1:50 a.m. Special District Govemment This seminar provides an overview of Special District organization and development. Topics to be covered include: Independent vs. dependent districts 0 Functions 0 Characteristics 0 Size 0 Diversity of purpose 0 Revenue and expenditures 0 Jurisdiction 0 Powers 0 Relationship to other local governments 0 Growth and change 0 Board merbersnip 0 +C'fassification 0 Scope 0 Operational management a Board-level management 0 Board Manager Reiationshaps The seminar leader for the opening session will be Jack Harris, Director of Education for California Special Districts Association, and head of Special Districts Management Seminars. For many years a University of California Continuing Education, Specialist, he has long been active in education and training for Special Districts. 12:00 n. - 1:45 p.m. Lunch 2.00 - 4:50 p.m. Lau and the Director T`!s seminar s devoted to a discussion of the law aid how it a=e_t; the Board m?- be-. I^ -hase important sessions, iegai requirements for Board procedures and action will be thoroughly covered. Legal and legislative trends as well as the effects of current legislation will be addressed. Other topics will be: Legal foundation for Special District 0 - r , ;? government Acts o, general applicability & Interpreting statutes Powers of Districts • Powers of ind:vidual Board members 9 Conflicts of interest • Financial disclosure 0 Organization and organization changes a LAFCO 0 Authorized acts and prohibited acts -1 Delegation of powers 0 i+7an:ner in which the Board may act 0 Ordinances and resolutions a Quorums and voting Y Legal meetings The seminar leader, attorney Dallas Holmes, is Chairman of the Public Law Department of the law firm of Best, Best & Krieger. ;N1r. Holmes' experience includes service in local and state government, and a distinguished record as counsel in Special District matters for many years. He is member of the Executive Committee of the Public Law Section of the Sete Bar of California. 6:00 - 7:00 p.m. Social hour 7:00 - 0:45 p.m. Banquet The Special Districts Report California Special Districts Association President Al Ricksecker will give this important update on statewide Special District programs and activities. President Ricksecker is a Director of San Juan Suburban Water District. He will discuss critical issues and review benefits available to Special District Directors with emphasis on the coming year. Topics to be covered include: Liability insurance 0 Deferred compensation a Health and dental insurance o Worker's Compensation 0 Self insurance 0 Education and training programs 0 Publications 0 Grant assistance 0 Labor relations 0 Conference plans and programs ® Local and regional Special District associations 0 Representation on LAFCO 0 Legislative goals and objectives 1) Critical issues Saturday, March 1 9:00 - 11:50 a.m. Law and the Director (continued) Dallas Holmes will continue his presentation on legal aspects of Board management with a comprehensive review of the Brown Act and other legislation. Topics will include: The Ralph M. Brown Act a Closed sessions 0 Gifts of public funds 0 Personal liability of public officials 0 Expenditures of public funds a Civil rights violations 0 Antitrust liability a Civil and criminal penalties 0 Reading and understanding pending legislation 12:00 - 1:45 p.m. Lunch The Sacramento Report In this special report Ralph A. Heim, legislative advocate for California Special Districts Association and partner in the Sacramento based California Advocates, will provide an update on current and projected legislative activity of Linterest to Board members. Topics to be covered include upcoming legislation and review of current legislative I actlN,ity. Major legislative issues facing Special Districts in 1986 will be discussed. ` F 2:00 - 3:15 .m. e; i p � r R�.ataons and the Board Mem- _. The afternoon will begin with a thorough review of Special District lab : .9 9 p labor-management relations. The role of the Board in personnel matters will be emphasized. Participants will identify and analyze the major criteria for an effective employee relations policy. Topics to be covered include: ` Concepts © Criteria •Management attitudes & approaches • Labors attitude & motivation • Memoranda of i understanding • `Meet & consult" 3 Protecting rights • Mandatory, permissible and illegal subjects • Bargaining s`.ategies • Grievances i Preventing grievances • Future trends and directions Matt Austin, the seninar leader, is a principal consultant with Blanning G Baker Associates, a public sector labor relations consulting Firm with offices in Los Angeles and Sacramento. Mr. Austin has ten years' experience in negotiation and administration of public sector collective bargaining agreements. He acts as chief negotiator fora number of Special Districts, and writes regularly for the Califomia Special Districts Labor Relations Information Service. , 3:30 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. Financial Management for Board Members Th's com review rYview of financial management princip!c_s and techniques will be conducted b a distinguished di q s u shed and exper enceG Spec ai District "nanciai consultant. lrc:uoe= n gala important and cynamic presentation will be: Financing — ente-rose ar?s non-en-arT�i?S� d:SutY�s v cT-udgets 0 fixed costs and Capital items 'X Long- range projections Alternative financing methods • Rates and fees • Accounting and reporting • The Board's role in cost control • Cash management Glenn Reiter, Principal of Glenn M. Reiter and Associates, a San Diego based financial, engineering and Y computer consulting firm will present this seminar. Glenn has lectured and written extensively on financial '} management of Special Districts. He is the author of Financing Special Districts and The Special District Director. He has pioneered the use of microcomputers as an aid in rate, fee and revenue management, and for cost A; analysis and control. Saturday evening is free. F Sunday, Febnuary 26 f 8:00 - 9:100 a.m. Continer ital Breakfast 9:00 - 10:15 a.m. Planning 4, Beginning with a review of fundamentals of planning, and progressing through the development of a District 'e} g g p 9� p 9 9 9 p management plan, this seminar will provide you the tools to assess how your District scores on the fundamentals, and to prepare a Board action plan. Included will be: u Defining your District mission • Types of District plans • Writing plan specifications • Defining the : responsibilities of the Board and the Manager• Relationships with District employees • Forming an r effective planning group that works • Keeping the plan up to date • Action plan 10:30 - 11:45 a.m. Communications and Community Relations This seminar is designed to provide specific guidance in planning, developing and carrying out an effective community and intergovernmental relations program. Included will be: �t The Public Information Plan • The new awareness — why it is essential to keep the public informed • r Defining the "community" and various publics • Elements of the plan • Costs • Priorities • How to estimate benefits • Guidelines Bob Rauch, Principal of Robert A. Rauch Business Communications of Santa Barbara, is a community relations and communications consultant. He has participated in many planning n and management t assessment projects r .:i involving teams of financial, legal, economic, engineering and public relations consultants. He specializes in all forms q of District communications — including brochures, newsletter, public talks press information exhibits —p , p , bits exh and films and he has lectured extensively and worked with many Special Districts on planning and community relations matters. 11:45 a.m. - 12:00 n. Closing Remarks The Institute concludes at noon. , The objectives of the Institute are . . . To help the Special District Director, Trustee, Commissioner or Manager maximize Board management effectiveness. To assist the newly elected or appointed Board member gain a comprehensive view of his duties and responsibilities. To enhance board-level management skills and decision-making ability. To inCrease the effectiveness of communication among Board members, staff, other government agencies, and people in the District. To improve working relationships and the interchange of ideas in Board operations. The Institute program consists of. . . j-, intensN e weekend senes of seminars at the ri.S. Grrant Hotel in San Diego on February 28, March 1 and 2, 1986. five seminars covering Special ✓iSLri ez legal Ct OveT�'il. :�, ,. a. aspects of eCial D:sCriCt Board g P g � P P management, Board financial management and control, planning, and community and intergovernmental relations. Each seminar features lecture-discussion sessions addressing topics of concern to Special District Board Members. Two special reports by guest speakers — one an update on the latest legislative activities from Sacramento — the other a report on California Special District Association programs and benefits. An outstanding faculty from practicing Special District management specialists, experienced i counselors, executives, and consultants. A copy of the comprehensive desk manual, the Handbook for Special District Directors. The location of the Institute is . . . The historic U.S. Grant Hotel in downtown San Diego. A symbol of elegance when it was established in 1910, the U.S. Grant reopened in December 1985 after an $80 million renovation which has completely restored the opulence and luxury of an earlier era. The result is a modern hotel providing a truly comfortable mixture of the elegance of yesterday and the convenience of today. Guest rooms are spacious and luxurious, faithfully recapturing the grace of the early 20th century while providing the finest in the amenities of 1986. Accommodations are appointed with fine fumishings and reflect the very highest standards of hospitality. The outstanding decor is carried over into the meeting center, where the furnishings and service in the spacious meeting rooms echo the grandeur of the entire U.S. Grant. The U.S. Grant is a short walking distance from "Gaslamp Quarter", a historic Victorian era restoration district featuring quaint taverns, fine restaurants and theaters. Seaport Village, one of Southern California's popular attractions, offers hundreds of unique shops, restaurants and entertaining activities only seven blocks away. Adjacent to the U.S. Grant is Horton Plaza shopping mall, featuring major department stores, restaurants and shops. Hotel guests are welcome to use the exclusive, private Health Club, which features racquet ball, tennis, aerobics classes, weight room, massage, spa, lap pool and snack bar. The San Diego Zoo and Sea World are minutes away, with tours available. The San Diego Trolley can be boarded just outside the hotel for the 16-mile trip to the Mexican Border. The U.S. Grant is located five minutes from the airport. The train station is seven blocks away. Shuttle and limousine service is available from both. If arriving by car, take the Downtown exit from 1.5 to Fourth Avenue, then south on Broadway. The hotel is at Fourth and Broadway. i�✓' THE SPECIAL DIST'RICT BOARD M'LkNAGEMENT INSTITUTE Bulk Rate U.S.Postage {{ ' Special Districts Management Seminars t` PAID , 21 Rincon Vista Santa Barbara,CA Permit No.439 Santa Barbara,CA 93103 + + `-•',' ? How To Enroll In The Special Dist-Act- Board Management Institute x Mail the enrollment form or tali (805) 966 5147. You may pay by check,bank credit card, or purchase order. #t f FEE The fee for THE SPECIAL DISTRICT BOARD MAPiAGE.ME7`NT INSTITUTE is $425 per person. Fee includes tuition,all seminar <ti' materials including a comprehensive manual containing instructional and reference materials, refreshment breaks, lunches on Friday M1 and Saturday, Friday evening banquet, and Sunday continental breakfast. The enrollment fee does not include lodging or other meals. fi' 9 9 1- ---------------------------- ----------------- ------ �. 1 Enrollment Application The Special District Board Management Institute 1 1 1 Mail with full payment to: Special Districts Management Seminars, 21 Rincon Vista, Santa Barbara, CA 93103 1 1 Name ---- — — - --- -- Phone ;. k-_ i Title ___ • _—.--- _- 1 Organization --- -- ---- —-- --- — 1 }'.' 1 1 Address 1 1 City, State, Zip --- -- ---- ---- - i 4 1 ❑ Check enclosed- $425 Make checks payable to:Special Districts Management Seminars ❑ Purchase order enclosed ❑ Credit card charge 1 1 1 1 1 — 1 Credit card account no. Expiration date Signatures 1------------------------------------------ F.; CANCELLATIONS AND REFUNDS The entire enrollment fee is fully refundable up to three days prior to the Institute, Enrollment cancellations made less than three days prior to the Institute are subject to a cancellation fee of one-half the Institute fee. Refunds will not be granted after the Institute has begun. In the event of Institute cancellation, all fees will be refunded. LODGING Lodging arrangements can be made directly with the U.S. Grant or a hotel of your own choosing.Although San Diego has many "•`-? ryl.hotels and motels, it is recommended that you make your reservations early. If you wish to stay at the.U.S. Grant Hotel,call (619) "Ji 3 232.3121. or mail your reservation DIRECTLY to U.S. Grant Hotel, 326 Broadway, San Diego CA 92101. The final date for guaranteed reservations at the U.S. Grant will be January 28, 1986. After that date the hotel will make every effort to accommodate late requests, but will not guarantee room availability.When reserving rooms, please refer to "future reservation for THE SPECIAL DISTRICT BOARD MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE".You may guarantee your reservation by sending a check for the first night room rental plus room tax, or by supplying your American Express,VISA or MasterCard credit card number with expiration date. { Please note that it may not be possible to check into your room until 3:15 p.m. In that case, for Friday arrivers, provision will be made to store your baggage until the Friday afternoon break. t - r f, THE SPECIAL DISTRICT BOARD nk"i AGEMENT INSTITUTE Special Districts Management Seminars j cs+ r_-..,,. 'I 21 Rincon Vista rixf �,���CA Barbara. CA 93103 ct--"4 ra 4 Ts i. t17.C7cii'1 _ci l.1 How To Enroll In The Special District Board Management Institute ?Mail the enrollment .form or call(805) 966-5147. You may pay by check, bank credit card, or purchase order. FEE The fee for THE SPECIAL DISTRICT BOARD MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE is $425 per person. Fee includes tuition,all seminar materials including a comprehensive manual containing instructional and reference materials, refreshment breaks, lunches on Friday and Saturday,Friday evening banquet,and Sunday continental breakfast.The enrollment fee does not include lodging or other meals. 1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. s 1 � Enrollment Application The Special District Board Management Institute Mail with full payment to:Special Districts Management Seminars, 21 Rincon Vista, Santa Barbara.CA 93103 t � iName .-�_ . —__ Phone Title Organization -- -- ---- ---- — - - i Address --- - -- --- ------ - City. State, Zip ❑ Check enclosed. $425 Make checks payable to:Special Districts Management Seminars ❑ Purchase order enclosed ❑ Credit card charge i i � s Credit card account no. Expiration date Signature r------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ . MF CANCELLATIONS AND REFUNDS The entire enrollment fee is fully refundable up to three days prior to the Institute. Enrollment cancellations made less than three days prior to the Institute are subject to a cancellation fee of one-half the Institute fee. Refunds will not be granted after the Institute has begun. In the event of Institute cancellation, all fees will be refunded. t' LODGING Lodging arrangements can be made directly with the U.S. Grant or a hotel of your own choosing,Although San Diego has many hotels and motels,it is recommended that you make your reservations early. If you wish to stay at the U.S. Grant Hotel,call (619) 232.3121, or mail your reservation DIRECTLY to U.S. Grant Hotel, 326 Broad,vay, San Diego CA 92101. The final date for guaranteed reservations at the U.S. Grant will be January 28. 1986. After that date the hotel will make every effort to accommodate late requests, but will not guarantee room availability.When reserving rooms, please refer to"future reservation for THE SPECIAL DISTRICT BOARD MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE".You may guarantee your reservation by sending a check for the first night room rental plus room tax, or by supplying your American Express, VISA or MasterCard credit card number with expiration date. Please note that it may not be possible to check into your room until 3:15 p.m. In that case,for Friday arrivers, provision will be made to store your baggage until the Friday afternoon break. MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM January 16, 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT : Annual Spe6ial Park Districts Forum Attached is information regarding the 1986 Special Park District Conference. This annual conference has been very useful to the District over the years. Two years ago we co-hosted the Forum along with the East Bay Regional Park District. Sufficient funds were already budgeted which would allow two Directors to attend. Note that the accommodations are inexpen- sive and registration fees are reasonable. The information exchange between board and staff members in the past has been so good that I hope at least one of you can attend this year. If any of you are interested, please bring the matter up at a Board meeting at an early date (January 22 if possible) for authorization so that room reservations , which may be tight, can be made. N9 Ar ALM AW Greater Vancouver Regional District Parks Department 4330 Kingsway,Burnaby,British Columbia,Canada V5H 4G8 Telephone(604)432-6350 ---------------- 12 December 1985 Dear Special Park District Forum Members: I am pleased to confirm the Greater Vancouver Regional Uistrict's invitation to you to attend the 1986 Special Park District Forum in Vancouver, British Columbia. It will be held commencing Wednesday evening, 28 May and concluding Saturday, 31 May 1986. The tentative itinerary for the Forum includes breakfast discussions followed by bus and boat tours of about eight Regional Parks, and evening dinner barbeques in the parks. You will see ocean front parks of the Greater Vancouver area, salmon run river parks which drain the North Shore mountains and parks on the floodplain and lowlands of the Fraser River estuary. We have several historic buildings in the Regional Parks which will provide interesting settings for lunch and dinner. I expect the fee for this Forum will be in the order of $120.00 Canadian (approximately $90-00 U.S. ) . Accommodation in a residence at the University of British Columbia will be $104.00 (Canadian) for four nights, including Saturday night. I have enclosed a questionnaire to assist us in arranging room bookings, transportation, and topics for discussion. It would be appreciated if you would return this questionnaire by 31 January 1986. A-s ,Y6u-4il1,,sffie from the attached material , our plan is to coordinate the jorum with the 1986 International Congress on Trail and River Recreation schqduledforithe perm 10 17.4 June inclusive. Many of you may be interested in this event or may be members of the U.S. National Trails Council who are holding their annual symposium during this period. It you are interested in this Trail and River Congress, please fill out the enclosed form and mail directly to the Outdoor Recreation Council of B.C. Also in the attached material is some information about Expo '86, British Columbia's World Exposition on the theme "Man in Motion" . We of course hope that we have learned the lessons that other recent World Fairs have provided, and that it will be an artistic and educational success. As 1986 is also the City of Vancouver's 100th Birthday, all the events together add up to a package of attractions that I hope will appeal to you. -2- In any event, I hope you will be able to attend the SLecial Park District Forum 1986 - you will find the natives are friendly and the language is remarkably similar. I will be circulating further information about the Forum in March. In the meantime, any suggestions for discussion topics at morning breakfast get-togethers or on other occasions during field trips would be welcome. Yours truly, OL R. A. Hankin Manager Regional Parks RAH:BR:rz .. 4 1986 Special Park District Forum in Vancouver, British Columbia Questionnaire re Please return by January 31, 1986 to: Vera Vlaovich Administrative Assistant GVRD Parks Department 4330 Kingsway Burnaby, B.C. V5H 4G8 Attendance: Please check one.. . Are you planning to attend the forum? Yes how many people Are you undecided as to whether you are coming? Yes ❑ how many people Are you definitely not coming to the forum? If Attending: Rooms are booked for Wednesday through Saturday evening, inclusive. There may be limited accommodation space available prior to and after the Forum. If you would like to stay over at the UBC resi- dence either before or after the conference, please explain the details (i .e. dates, number of people) and we will try to arrange this for you. Discussion Topics The following topics are proposed for breakfast discussion: 1 . Signing in parks : minimal signing and systems for the entire park information hierarchy from how to get to the park to individual trail signs. 2. Special events : What is your favourite special event? What is the key to it? 2 3. Participation by non-profit, community groups in preparing a park plan, constructing a park facility, managing a facility, or organizing a special event. 4. Heritage buildings, in parks: care and management, public versus commercial use. Would you be able to contribute to any of the above discussion topics? Please explain (e.g. as a speaker describing your experience, or by providing background material ). Are there subjects other than those listed above that you would like discussed? If yes, please list them. Thank you for helping with this information. Your Name Park District Address Telephone INTERNATIONAL coNGRis EGRESS ON INTERNATIONAL DES IL AND EATION RIVER ET DES RAN PLAISIRS AN ULUATIJ� RECR INFORMATION SHEET THE PROGRAM Chilliwack Valley: A watershed experiencing considerable recreation Day I Sunday June 1st and resource use under a variety of jurisdictions. Focus: Multiple use Theme: The value to society of trail and river recreation trails and rivers,managing conflicts with resource use,managing high Topics addressed:Economic,social and other values to individuals and use, the role of government, private and volunteer sectors. to society as a whole, the growth of recreation related tourism, user- -Thompson River: A rafting trip in the interior of B.C. Focus: River pay and volunteer involvement. An introductory keynote speaker will corridors. precede a series of concurrent workshops investigating these issues. -Whistler Mountain:A commercial recreation development.Focus:The Resource people from the U.S., Canada. Britain, Europe. role of the private sector, trails and rivers in a multiple use area. tad Day 2 Monda June -Gulf Islands: A bicycle tour of these scenic islands. Focus: Bicycle y and hiking trails in high use areas. Theme: The benefits of increasing participation -Urban Trails:Trails in Greater Vancouver under a variety of jurisdic- Topics addressed: Benefit to health and reduced health costs. fitness. tions. Focus:The role of volunteers.government and the private sec- participation trends,the role of government.A keynote speaker will set tor in trail development, trail management in high use areas. the pace for the day,which will feature concurrent sessions. Resource THE SOCIALS people from New Zealand, Asia, Europe. North America. Our aim is to promote maximum interaction between congress delegates. Day 3 Tuesday June 3rd Plan to join in the social events: Theme: Management techniques Saturday May 31st: A "get-aquainted- social and welcoming Topics addressed:Land use conflicts.managing use.the role of govern- session. ment,private and volunteer sectors.There will be eight concurrent field Sunday June Ist: Take a cruise up Indian Arm to truly appreciate trips (detailed below). Vancouver's natural setting. Day 4 Wednesday June 4th Monday.June 2nd:The National Trails Council of the U.S.A.will Theme: Summation be hosting a barbeque. Tuesday June 3rd: Following the field trips, local volunteer clubs This day will provide an opportunity to pull the themes together and look forward to viable solutions.A keynote speaker will develop themes will welcome you to their community. Wednesday June 4th:The wrap-up banquet will feature a keynote from previous days,and participants will then break into small workshop speaker. groups to discuss issues and solutions. There will be an opportunity to present resolutions. During the Congress a 24-hour conference ceritie will be available for The wrap-up session will be at the evening banquet. informal interaction. Keynote speakers and workshop presenters will be drawn from around Hosts and hostesses will be present throughout to answer your questions. the globe. including: RELATED ACTIVITIES - New Zealand - U.S.A. Exhibits and displays will be on show throughout the Congress. - Switzerland - Canada Participants are invited to bring displays,film presentations or other ex- - England - Norway hibits they may wish to share. Please advise us of your space requirements - Japan - Scotland by February 28th 1986. Film and media presentations will demonstrate round-the-world ex- FIELD TRIPS periences with trail and river recreation. Participants may choose from one of eight field trips demonstrating Expo '86-don't miss this world class exposition. Details in enclosed management techniques under a range of jurisdictions. brochure. Mount Baker. U.S.A.: A popular year round destination Recreation Explore Super Natural B.C.-Your registration package will give details Area managed by the U.S. Forest Service. Focus: Multiple use trails of a host of pre-and-post congress trips tier those wishing to take advan- on forest lands. tage of them. Skagit Valley:A transboundary natural area managed by a joint Cana- dian/U.S.Commission. Focus: Transboundary river issues. land use PROGRAM IDEAS conflicts, long distance trails. Although the program details are nearing completion. as of July 1985. North Shore: A wilderness park in a near-urban setting. Focus: the planning group would welcome your ideas on workshop topics and Volunteer involvement in trail development, managing high use in possible resource people. Please forward them to the Congress Plan- wilderness areas, safety and education. ning Group by the end of August 1985. .-—-1 11 ' 1�1 01 Congress Coordinated by/Le Congr�-s estorganists par:Outdoor Recreation Council oi British Columbia Suite 170/1200 Hornby Street,Vancouver, British Columbia,Canada V6Z 2E2 (604(687-1600 Telex 04-51588 INTE AtoNAL CONGR8 CONGRESS ON INTERNATIONAL DES TRAIL AND RIVER PLAISIRS A VL)0A1TNrIPQ, RECREATION ET DES RAN( N:ESS REQUEST. FOR INFORMATION Those wishing for additional information prior to registering should compete and return this slip. Name:M r.1 M rs./M s.1 Dr./ First Name Family Name Address: Street Town Country Postal Code/Zip Code Telephone: Home Business Area Code Area Code Niue:Registration is limited to 373 and will be on a first-come,first-served basis. You are encouraged to register early. EARLY REGISTRATION FORM Name:Mr./Mrs./Ms./Dr./ First Nance Family Name Address: Street Town Cownry Postal Code/Zip Code Telephone: Home Business Area Code Area Cods Language preference Occupation: ❑ English Affiliation: ❑ French (if any) REGISTRATION FEE ACCOMMODATION Early Registration Fee Accommodation will be available at the University of British (prior to January 31st, 1986): $175.00 Cdn. Columbia,approximate cost S26.00 per night.Please indicate below Late Registration Fee if you would like details of accommodation. (after February lst, 1986): $200.00 Cdn. Please send accommodation information ❑ Registration fee entitles delegates to: - Admission to all sessions - Saturday May 31st "Get Acquainted Social" - Sunday June 1st Evening cruise EXPO SS - Monday June 2nd Evening barbecue/social Three day passes to Expo '86 are available to early registrants at a - Tuesday Jute 3rd Field trips special price of$26.95 Cdn. - Wednesday June 4th Evening banquet - Conference proceedings I would like to purchase 3 day Expo *86 passes. (Please add cost to registration fee.) All cheques, bank drafts or money orders should be in Canadian funds, made payable to "Outdoor Recreation Council of B.C." Registration fee S # Expo passes at $26.95 ea. S TOTAL COST $ (enclosed) Your registration will be acknowledged immediately. Congress material will be nailed to early registrants in Febrrmry 1986. Please complete and return ONE of the above fortes to: International Congress on Trail and River Recreation, 1200 Hornby Street, Van- ouver. B.C.. Canada. V6Z 2E2 Phone 604-687-1600 B.J.BLOMMERS(1845-1914( �. On the Dunes ",J ��Surles dunesv In den Dunen (_' Oil on wood,31,3/19,4cm Glasgow Museums and Art Galleries — o 14 a`m d U IY WeDe r C-AGA& T N 3.82 Y Lorip L N 7 M e� CLAIMS No. 86-02 Meeting 86-03 .�IIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Date: January 22, 1986 C L A I M S Revised Amount Name Description 9075 20.00 American Land Resource Association Subscription 9076 13.20 AmeriGas Tank Rental 9077 85.54 AT&T Information Systems Telephone Equipment 9078 287.97 Bruce Baker's Skywood Gas & Towing Fuel for District Vehicles 9079 72.28 Bay Muffler District Vehicle Repair 9080 20.00 California EIR Monitor Subscription 9081 89.43 California Water Service Company Water Service 9082 122.24 David Camp Reimbursement--Repairs on Ranger Residence 9083 44.32 Clark's Auto Par ts and Machine Sho p Parts for District Vehicles 9084 213.00 Communications Research Company Radio Service 9085 300.00 Susan Cretekos Patrol Services for January 9086 112.24 Alice Cummings Private Vehicle Expense 9087 23.99 Discount Office Supply Office Supplies 9088 26.41 E1 Monte Stationers Office Supplies 9089 33.4o John Escobar Reimbursement--Field Supplies and Training Expense 9090 45.00 Jean Fiddes Reimbursement--Subscription 9091 2,444.00 First American Title Guaranty Co. Title Report and Policy 9092 125.00 First American Title Insurance Co. Title Report 9093 500.00 Foss and Associates Personnel Consulting Fee--December 9094 39. 16 Foster Brothers Field Supplies 9095 142.51 Home Electrical Field Supplies 9096 15.50 Hubbard and Johnson Field Supplies 9097 95.07 The Hub Schneider's Uniform Expense 9098 106.50 Langley Hill Quarry Water System Repairs 9099 148.47 Light Impressions Photographic Supplies 9100 260.00 Los Gatos Garbage Company Dumpster Rental 9101 422.41 Minton's Lumber and Supply Field Supplies 9102 61 .58 Norney's of Mountain View, Inc. Office Supplies 9103 393.37 On-Line Business Systems , Inc. Computer Service 9104 67.26 Orchard Supply Hardware Field Supplies 9105 627.27 Pacific Bell Telephone Service 9106 450.38 Pacific Gas & Electric Company Utilities 9107 10.00 Peninsula Conservation Center Subscription CLAIMS NO. 86-02 , Meeting: 86-03 Date: January 22, 19V Revised Amount Name Description 9108 91 .31 Recreational Equipment, Inc. Uniform Expense 9109 24.O0 City of Saratoga Agenda Subscription 9110 985.58 Shell Oil Company Fuel and Repairs for District Vehicles 9111 12.59 Skyline County Water District Water Service 9112 i{?'J,f G�.: Swan Graphics, Inc. Typesetting 9113 17.59 Unocal Fuel for District Vehicles 9114 342.90 Xerox Corporation Maintenance Agreement 9115 25.23 Yardbird Equipment Sales Equipment Repair 9116 1L0.50 ZZZ Sanitation Corpa^y Sanitation Services 9117 317.10 Herbert Grench Reimbursement--Meal Conference ant Conference Registration 9118 4,571 .52 California Water Service Company Installation of Water Service at Rancho San Antonio 9119 102.08 Petty Cash Meal Conferences, Office Supplies and Private Vehicle Expense *Issued as emergency check on January 10, 1986 I CLAIMS No. 86-02 Meeting 86-03 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Date: January 22, 1986 C L A I M S Revised r Amount Name Description I 9075 20.00 American Land Resource Association Subscription ' 9076 13.20 AmeriGas Tank Rental 9077 85.54 AT&T Information Systems Telephone Equipment 9078 287.97 Bruce Baker's Skywood Gas & Towing Fuel for District Vehicles 9079 72.28 Bay Muffler District Vehicle Repair 9080 20.00 California EIR Monitor Subscription 9081 89.43 California Water Service Company Water Service 9082 122.24 David Camp Reimbursement--Repairs on Ranger Residence 9083 44.32 Clark's Auto Parts and Machine Shop Parts for District Vehicles 9084 213.00 Communications Research Company Radio Service 9085 300.00 Susan Cretekos Patrol Services for January 9086 112.24 Alice Cummings Private Vehicle Expense 9087 23.99 Discount Office Supply Office Supplies 9088 26.41 El Monte Stationers Office Supplies 9089 33.40 John Escobar Reimbursement--Field Supplies and 9090 45.00 Jean Fiddes Training Expense � Reimbursement-=Subscription 9091 2,�344,00 First American Title Guaranty Co. Title Report and Policy 9092 125.00 First American Title Insurance Co. Title Report 9093 500.00 Foss and Associates Personnel Consulting Fee--December 9094 39.16 Foster Brothers Field Supplies 9095 142.51 Home Electrical. Field Supplies 9096 15.50 Hubbard and Johnson Field Supplies 9097 95.07 The Hub Schneide4ls Uniform Expense 9098 106.50 Langley Hill Quarry. Water System Repairs 9099 148.47 Light Impressions Photographic Supplies 9100 260.00 Los Gatos Garbage Company, Dumpster Rental 9101 422.41 Minton's Lumber and Supply . Field Supplies 9102 61 .58 Norney's of Mountain View, Inc. Office Supplies 9103 393.37 On-Line Business Systems, Inc. Computer Service 9104 67.26 Orchard Supply Hardware Field Supplies 9105 627.27 Pacific Bell Telephone Service 9106 450.38 Pacific Gas & Electric Company Utilities 9107 10.00 Peninsula Conservation Center, Subscription CLAIMS NO. 86-02 Meeting: 86-03 Date: January 22, 19�,, "i Revised Amount Name Description 9108 91 -31 Recreational Equipmen.t, Inc. Uniform Expense 9109 24.00 City of Saratoga Agenda Subscription 9110 985-58 Shell Oil Company Fuel and Repairs for District Vehicles 9111 12.53 Skyline County Water District Water Service 9112 100.00w Swan Graphics, Inc. Typesetting 9113 17-59 Unocal Fuel for District Vehicles 9114 342.90 Xerox Corporation Maintenance Agreement' 9115 25-23 Yardbird Equipment Sales Equipment Repair 9116 160.50 ZZZ Sanitation Ccmpanv Sar7tatTon Services 9117 317.10 Herbert Grench Reimbursement--Meal Conference and Conference Registration 9118 4,571 .52 California Water Service Company Installation of Water Service at Rancho San Antonio 9119 102.08 Petty Cash Meal Conferences, Office Supplies and Private Vehicle Expense *Issued as emergency check on January 10, 1986 ' CLAIMS No. 8 6-0 2 Meeting 86-03 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Dates January 22, 19"": C L A I M S " Amount Name Description 9075 20.00 American Land Resource Association Subscription 9076 13.20 AmeriGas Tank Rental 9077 85.54 AT&T Information Systems Telephone Equipment 9078 287.37 Bruce Baker's Skywood Gas & Towing Fuel for District Vehicles 9079 72.28 Bay Muffler District Vehicle Repair 9080 20.00 California EIR Monitor Subscription 9081 89.43 California Water Service Company Water Service 9082 122.24 David Camp Reimbursement--Repairs on Ranger Residence 9083 44.32 Clark's Auto Parts and Machine Shop Parts for District Vehicles 9084 213.00 Communications Research Company Radio Service 9085 300.00 Susan Cretekos Patrol Services for January 9086 112.24 Alice Cummings Private Vehicle Expense 9087 23.99 Discount Office Supply Office Supplies 9088 26.41 El Monte Stationers Office Supplies 9089 33.,40 John Escobar Reimbursement--Field Supplies and Training Expense 9090 45.00 Jean Fiddes Reimbursement--Subscription 9091 2,444.00 First American Title Guaranty Co. Title Report and Policy 9092 125.00 First American Title Insurance Co. Title Report 9093 500.00 Foss and Associates Personnel Consulting Fee--December 9094 39. 16 Foster Brothers Field Supplies 9095 142.51 Home Electrical Field Supplies 9096 15.50 Hubbard and Johnson Field Supplies 9097 95.07 The Hub Schneider's Uniform Expense 9098 106.50 Langley Hill Quarry Water System Repairs 9099 148.47 Light Impressions Photographic Supplies 9100 260.00 Los Gatos Garbage Company Dumpster Rental 9101 422.41 Minton's Lumber and Supply Field Supplies 9102 61 .58 Norney's of Mountain View, Inc. Office Supplies 9103 393.37 On-Line Business Systems , Inc. Computer- Service 9104 67.26 Orchard Supply Hardware Field Supplies 9105 627.27 Pacific Bell Telephone Service 9106 450.38 Pacific Gas & Electric Company Utilities 9107 10.00 Peninsula Conservation Center Subscription - CLAIMS NO. 86-02 Meeting: 86-03 Date: January 22, 1986 Amount Name Description 9108 91 .31 Recreational Equipment, Inc. Uniform Expense 9109 24.00 City of Saratoga Agenda Subscription . 9110 985.55 Shell Oil Company Fuel and Repairs for District Vehicles 9111 12.53 Skyline County Water District Water Service 9112 100.00* Swan Graphics, Inc. Typesetting 9113 17.53 Unocal Fuel for District Vehicles 9114 342.90 Xerox Corporation Maintenance Agreement 9115 25.23 Yardbird Equipment Sales Equipment Repair 9116 160.:73 ZZZ Sanitation Company SLnivation Services 9117 317.10 Herbert Grench Reimbursement--Meal Conference and Conference Registration 9118 4,571 .52 California Water Service Company Installation of Water Service at Rancho San Antonio. -Issued as emergency check on January 10, 1986 i