Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout19860813 - Agendas Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 86-19 Meeting 86-19 Ir MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT OLD MILL OFFICE CENTER,BUILDING C,SUITE 135 201 SAN ANTONIO CIRCLE,MOUNTAIN VIEW,CALIFORNIA 94040 (415)949-5500 7: 30 P.M. REGULAR MEETING Old Mill Office Center Wednesday BOARD OF DIRECTORS 201 San Antonio Circle August 13, 1986 A G E N D A Building C-135 Mountain View, CA 94040 (7 :30) * ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES (July 23 , 1986) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ADOPTION OF AGENDA BOARD BUSINESS (7 :45) 1. Appointment of Peace Officer - D. Hansen Resolution Appointing Peace Officer (7 :50) 2. Final Adoption of the Interim Use and Management Plan for the Davidson Property Addition to El Sereno Open Space Preserve - D. Hansen (7 :55) 3. Final Adoption of the Interim Use and Management Plan for the Cunningham Property Addition to the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve - D. Hansen (8 :00) 4 . Final Adoption of the Revised Use and Management Plan for San Mateo County Baylands Reserve and Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Study Area - D. Hansen (8 :05) 5 . Results of Questionnaire on Brown Act, Sphere of Influence and Annexation -- Land Acquisition Policy Committee (D. Wendin, N. Hanko and R. Bishop) (9 :05) 6 . Review of Use and Management Plans for the Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area of the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve and for the Foothills Open Space Preserve - D. Hansen (9 :25) 7 . Program Evaluation for 1985-1986 Fiscal Year -- H. Grench (9 :45) 8 . Authorization to Solicit Bids for Public Access Improvements to Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve - D. Hansen (10 :05) 9 . Co-Sponsorship of Regional Conference : "The Greenbelt' s Public Lands : The Next Twenty Years" - H. Grench (10 :10) INFORMATIONAL REPORTS CLAIMS CLOSED SESSION (Land Negotiation and Litigation Matters) ADJOURNMENT *Times are estimated. Agenda is subject to change of order. (over) Herbert A.Grench,Genera!Manager Board of Directors:Katherine Duffy,Nonette G.Hanko,Teena Henshaw,Richard S.Bishop,Edward G.Shelley,Harry A.Turner,Daniel G.Wendin ..................._ TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: When an -stem you'Ae eoneeAned with appeatus on the agenda, the ChaiA wiU invite you to add&ms the BoaAd at that .time; on otheA mattetu,, you may addAe�ss the Boatd undeA DAaQ Communications. An atteAnati.ve is to comment to the Board by a WAitten Communication, which the Boatd appteciate6. Each SpeaheA w.ce.2. otdinaxity be t imdted to 3 minutes. When Aeeognized, ptease begin by stating youA name and addAcss. We Aequest that you 6.it out the goAm pAovi.ded and ptezent it to the Reeotding Secutaty so that youA name and addtus can be aeeuAa tet y inctuded in the minutes. NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING A Public Meeting has been tentatively scheduled for discussion of the Hassler Open Space Preserve on September 9 at 6 P.M. at the Preserve. Call District office at (415) 949-5500 for meeting place and confirmation of meeting date. Meeting 86-18 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT OLD MILL OFFICE CENTER,BUILDING C,SUITE 135 201 SAN ANTONIO CIRCLE,MOUNTAIN VIEW,CALIFORNIA 94040 (415)949-5500 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 23 , 1986 MINUTES I. ROLL CALL Vice President Daniel Wendin called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. Members Present: Katherine Duffy , Daniel Wendin, Teena Henshaw, Nanette Hanko, Harry Turner and Richard Bishop. Member Absent: Edward Shelley. Personnel Present: Herbert Grench, Craig Britton, David Hansen, Mary Hale, Jean Fiddes, Stanley Norton, Del Woods, James Boland and Emma Johnson. II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES A) July 9 . 19Q6 Motion: R. Bishop moved the approval of the minutes of July 9 , 1986 D. Wendin seconded the motion. Discussion: K. Duffy referred to the Informational Report concerning the proposed road over the Novitiate property and requested the item be corrected to note that the Town 1 of Los Gatos had approved a use permit for the College which required a road but had not approved a road plan. R. Bishopaccepted the amendment as art of his motion. P P The motion passed 5 to 0, with T. Henshaw abstaining because she was absent from the meeting. III. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS E. Johnson reported that the Board had received a letter dated July 5 from Robert Zatkin of Woodside" critical of the manner in which downed trees are sectioned and discarded on the Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve and proposing a program of removal and stockpiling for firewood and milling stock. J. Boland explained the sequence of events following a major landslide on the Preserve which resulted in the downed trees referred to by Mr. Zatkin and showed slides of the Preserve. He said that, as time and ground conditions permit Rangers do remove unsightly dead and downed trees or those which present fire hazards . D. Hansen added that the District attempts to return the forests to as natural a state as possible. He noted that the District uses extreme caution if burning dead and downed trees in areas near residences. T. Henshaw said she would like to have the present policy on downed trees reconsidered. R. Bishop said he favors the present policy, that downed trees are part of the natural process. D. Wendin said the question should be considered during the Use and Management Plan for Purisima Creek Open Space Preserve when it is presented to the Board in the fall. Herbert A.Grench,General Manager Board or Directors:Katherine Duffy,Nonette G._Hanko.Teena Henshaw_Flicbartl_�_�ilatwn_Fdu„xrd r. edu.,, u­A z- Meeting 86-18 Page two D. Hansen noted he would consult with Mr. Zatkin during the Use and Management Plan review process.. IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Harry Haeussler, 1094 Highland Circle, Los Altos referred to a newspaper o article regarding development f the Neary Quarry land and suggested the District should be alert so that no trail and access rights are lost. C. Britton said that staff is meeting with the buyer to determine what he proposes for the area and that the District 's primary interest is in keeping the trail open between Windmill Pasture and the stable area. Kathy Kennedy-Miller, 16222 Skyline Boulevard, Woodside, President of Kings Mountain Association reported that she had not received packet information to date. H. Grench stated that the packet mailed on July 18 would have been the first since her subscription began and that the Skyline area has had mail delivery problems in the past. V. ADOPTION OF AGENDA D. Wendin stated that the agenda was adopted by Board consensus. VI. BOARD BUSINESS A. Final Adoption of the Revised Use and Management Plan for Fremont Older Open Space Preserve (Report R-86-56 of July 18-i 1986) D. Hansen noted that the Board had requested that staff address the issues of the disposition of the adobe residence and the pro- posed lease of the hayfield. C. Britton reviewed various options for the adobe and said that staff recommends protection and restora- tion of the building by offering it and the surrounding gardens in the existing Older house tenant's lease at no cost with required phased restoration included. D. Woods reviewed the results of a 1981 study regarding the nesting of meadowlarks in the hayfield and said that staff recommends pursuing an agricultural tenant for the hayfield for spring 1987 incorporating conditions for the timing of the harvest and discing and for undisturbed vegetative islands to promote potential nesting. N. Hanko noted that there is historical interest in the adobe and said that she supported staff's recommendations . K. Duffy and R. Bishop added their support for staff 's recommendations. Motion: R. Bishop moved that the Board approve the Revised Use and Management Plan for Fremont Older Open Space Preserve as contained in Reports R-86-49 and R-86-56. K. Duffy seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. B. Review of the Use and Management Plan for the San Mateo County Bay- lands Reserve and Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Study Areas (Report R-86-55 of July 17 , 1986) D. Woods showed slides of the two areas illustrating the current conditions and proposed improvements. D. Hansen reviewed the staff report, noting that there has been one addition to the San Mateo County Baylands Reserve since the last Use and Management review. He reported that San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Department had applied for a trail development grant from the California Coastal Conservancy to fund the purchase of necessary trail easements and construction of the South Bay Trail segment from Runnymede Street to Bay Road and encircling the former salt pond adjacent to Bay Road. He said that Phase 1 of a three- phased project would include a parking area on Bay Road and would provide access to the Bay Road portion of the Reserve. He noted that District staff had prepared the grant for the County . Meet,ing 86-18 Page three D. Hansen said that staff recommends monitoring the Lucky Acres Development Plan with BCDC. He said further recommendations in- clude construction -of -a hiking and bicycling trail, a' parking area and signs, and a bridge as wel-l .'as working with San Mateo County and California Coastal Conservancy on the implementation of the South Bay Trail from Runnymede Street to Dumbarton Bridge. D. Woods showed slides of the Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Study Area. He said it is a popular site and that the addition of the. amphitheatre has concentrated activities at Shoreline Park's main gate area. He added that staff will monitor plans for a proposed con- ference center in the area and its potential impact on the Preserve and will follow up on the source of a drain .at the site. Motion: N. Hanko moved that the Board tentatively adopt the Use and Management Plan recommendations for the San Mateo County Baylands Reserve and Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Study Area contained in the staff report. K. Duffy seconded the motion. Discussion: K. Duffy said that signing is needed in Shore- line Park to direct visitors to the District' s areas. D. Woods said that the signing would be proposed to the City of Mountain View and added that staff is working on , a brochure which will assist visitors in finding the Nature Study Area. The motion passed 6 to 0. C. Request to Sup2ort the San Mateo County Access Grant Application to the Coastal Conservancy (Report R-86-54 of July 17 , 1986) Motion: H. Turner moved that the Board adopt Resolution 86-43, a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Supporting and Approving the County of San Mateo' s Application for California Coastal Conservancy Funds - Baylands Bicycle Trail (Runnymede Street to Cooley Landing Area) . N. Hanko seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0 . D. Review of Public Notification Policies (Report R-86-53 of July 15, 1986) N. Hanko noted that neighbors to the preserves have expressed concerns regarding the District's notification policies. She said that present policies require notification of neighbors of an acqui- sition after close of escrow and suggested that the District would have a better sense of public and neighborhood interest if policies were amended to advise both public and neighbors at the time land is being considered publically for acquisition. She suggested that Section 1. b) of the Public Notification Policies be amended to delete "After close of escrow for purchase of a parcel and before second reading of interim use and management plan. " and to retain "Notification of owners of properties contiguous to parcel to advise of acquisition and of opportunity to be placed on a mailing list for notification of preserve land use and management planning matters . " . She suggested staff draft a further refinement of the language which would include notification of neighbors sharing a private road that would access the parcel. N. Hanko referred to H. Grench' s memorandum to her dated July 11 regarding notification lists for various preserves and the adminis- trative difficulties in maintaining such lists and suggesting Meeting 86-18 Page four having all interested persons receive agendas for all meetings for a minor cost of $5-10 per year. D. Wendin expressed some concern that giving notice in advance may delay acquisitions unnecessarily and that there will be times when it may not work. C. Britton noted that the District uses assessors' records to deter- mine names of adjoining owners, and that these records are not always up-to-x-date- He said that he hoped that if policies are changed, the General Manager would still be permitted to delay notification of neighbors if there is sufficient reason to do so. H. Grench suggested that staff could return to the Board with explicit language for the proposed changes . K. Kennedy-Miller read a Resolution from the Kings Mountain Associa- tion which urged in part adoption of a responsible notification procedure for "all interested and adjacent property owners through- out the . . .District, " with further suggestions as to timing and definition of property owners. She gave a copy of the resolution to District staff . Janet Schwind, 11825 Skyline Boulevard, Los Gatos and Beez Jones, 16891 Stevens Canyon Road, Cupertino suggested the proposed changes would be better public relations for the District, noted that wording of the notice was important, and suggested that the notice include a map of the property under consideration. David Miller, 16222 Skyline Boulevard, Woodside, said neighbors may have input and information about situations and activities that may be valuable to the Board. Motion: R. Bishop moved that the Board approve the concept of N. Hanko's two proposals and requested that staff formu- late language reflecting the Board' s discussion including sending agendas to adjoining property owners and all rights- of-ways and such owners that may seem reasonable under the Kings Mountain Association resolution, and that this be considered at a future Board meeting after language is drafted. H. Turner seconded the motion. Discussion: R. Bishop clarified that he did not intend that staff incorporate the KMA resolution word for word but to use language and recommendations from it that are feasible. Motion to Amend: D. Wendin moved to delete from the motion the reference to the Kings Mountain Association resolution. T. Henshaw seconded the motion. R. Bishop said he accepted the amendment to his original motion. Motion: R. Bishop restated his original motion to request staff formulate language giving consideration to the Kings Mountain Association resolution but not be bound by all language contained in the resolution. H. Turner, as seconder, accepted the revised wording for the motion. Discussion: D. Wendin expressed the Board' s consensus that the matter be considered at the first meeting in September. The motion passed 6 to 0. Meeting 86-18 Page five K. Miller said the Kings Mountain Association would like to have the opportunity to address the Board regarding access to the Dyer property and to meet with staff. D. • Wendin suggested the meeting with staff should occur prior to scheduling an agenda item so that staff could make recommendations to the Board. Responding to KMA's concerns, R. Bishop noted that the District does not always intend to bring the maximum number of people onto a new property and that it some- times is years before access is fully developed. VII. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS D. Hansen called attention to J. Boland' s letter to Mr. Seaby responding to his article in the Kings Mountain Echo regarding controlled burning. J. Boland reported that the sheriff's patrol had begun at Mt. Umunhum on the basis of a verbal agreement and that he will continue to work on a formal agreement. S. Norton announced that the Hybl vs. Rose y litigation has been affirmed on appeal in favor of the District's position. He reported that Closed Session litigation matters to be discussed fell under subdivision (b) (1) of the Government Code Section 54956.9 . VIII. CLAIMS Motion: D. Wendin moved approval of Revised Claims 86-14. T. Henshaw seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. IX. CLOSED SESSION The Board adjourned to Closed Session at 9 :20 P.M. X. ADJOURNMENT The Board reconvened to adjourn the meeting at 10 :20 P.M. Emm a a Johnson Secretary I w CLATI-IS No. 86-14 MIbPENIn 86-18 A REGIONAL --OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Date: zg 23, Date: July 23, 15 C L A I ri S REVISED A:-C) t Name Description 3,725 222.75 -A-Too_ f Shed Drum Roller Rental 9725 7.43 AT&T Consumer :Products Division Phone Service 5727 100.95 Adia Services, Inc. Temporary Office Help 5.1723 13.64 AmeriGas Tank Rental 9723 100.00 Bay "Area Water Trucks Water Service 573 5,575-00 Louis Bordi Road Grading and Repairs _9731 2,060.00 Brauer Grading Road Grading 9732 10.00 Scott Duschman Photograph 9733 50-00 State of California Securities Division Fee for Issuance of New Promissory N+ 9 73` 303.65 California Water Service Company Water Service 9735 3,600-00 The .CEIP Fund Legal Intern Program 61 . 1 9735) i00- 3 Clark's Auto Parts Parts for District Vehicles 9737 117.60' The- Country Almanac Notice of Election Advertisement 9733 29.37 Crest Copies, Inc. Bluelines 9733 294-95 Alice Cummings Reimbursement--Slide View System and Film Processing a740 46.22 Dennis Danielson Reimbursement--Ranger .Residence RepaKl 9741 688.01 The Darkroom Enlargements and Film Processing ' 9742 2,000.00 - Deloitte, Haskins & .Sells Professional Services1 9i43 479-39 Discount Office Supply Office Supplies 974`_ 115.00 Employment Development Department' Unemployment Insurance Payment 9745 34.22 John Escobar Reimbursement--Uniform Expense 9746 1 ,450.00 John P. Estes Caretaker Services and Equipment Rep', 4747 1 ,542-75 Farrelle Communications Co. Radios and Installation 3743 31 .00 Federal Express Corporation Express Nail c?''� 43-50 Jean Fiddes -� Reimbursement--Notary Bond and Stam ' i950 60-00 First American Title Insurance Co. Reconveyance Fees 37a1 372.01 First Interstate Bank Note Paying Agent--1982 Note Issue 3;>52 65>634-73 Flinn, Gray S Herterich Insurance Coverage 9:53 653.59 Foster Brothers, Inc. Keys, Locks and Repairs 115-65 William Glass Trucking Base Rock Delivery 57 55 350-00 Raye Girouard _ Patrol Services %7 5' 275.69 Herbert Grench Reimbursement--Conference Registratio -- and Out-of-Town Meeting Expenses ;r57 58. 80 Mary Gunder•t Private Vehicle Expense ;7:3 1 ,517.30 Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation Equipment Rental r Claims No. 86-14 Meeting -86-18- Date: July 23, 1986.4 �''�011�?t Name Description REVISED 9759 59.81 The Hub Schneiders Uniform Expense 9760 453.78 Hubbard Johnson Field Supplies 9761 167.46 - identification Services' ' Internationale Ranger Identification Cards 97062 30.00 Matthew Ken Reimbursement--Fire Training Class 9763 9,500.00 Langley Hill Quarry Septic System Repairs 9764 264.69 Lawrence Tire Service, Inc. Tires for District Vehicle 9765 580.00 Los Altos. Garbage Company Dempster Rental 9766- 1 ,319.88 Minton's Lumber and Supply Field Supplies 9767 80.93 tionta Vista Garden Center Field Supplies 9768 69.00 Department* of Motor Vehicles Fees for Transfer of Title 9769 31 .88 Joyce Nicholas Private Vehicle Expense 9770 17.68 Noble Ford Tractor, Inc. Parts for Field Equipment " 9771 18.60. Norney's of Mountain View Office Supplies 9772 161 .60 Stanley Norton May and June Expenses" 9773 378.64 � On-Line Business Systems, Inc. Computer Services .. 9774 1 ,439.62 Orchard Supply Hardware Field Supplies 9775 972.45 Pacific Bell Telephone Service " 977fi 0 �1 5 Pacific Gas and Electric. Company Uril l-vi-e'S' 9777 40.28 Peninsula Blueprint, Inc. p > Drafting Materials an 9778 905.57 Peninsula 0i`i Company Fuel for District Vehicles 9779 418.75 Pine Cone Lumber Co., Inc. Field Supplies 9780 74.84 :Rancho Hardware Field Supplies 9781 500.00 B. J. Rickard Caretaker---Bullis Property 97$2 24.61 David Sanguinetti Reimbursement--Uniform Expense 9783 22.37 S' W Equipment Company . Equipment Repairs 9784 101 .08 San Francisco Water Department Water Service 9785 150.00 San Mateo County Fire Chief Fire Survival Training for Rangers 9786 152.88 San Mateo Times Newspaper Group Notice of Election Advertisement 9789 170.00 County"of 'Santa Clara General Services Agency Dispatching Services 9789 997.24 Scribner Graphic Press Brochure Printing 9790 460.89 Sears, Roebuck and. Company Television and VCR Recorder . 9791 2,645.00 E. R. Sheehan Trail Rebuilding .5792 38.65 Skyline County Water District Water Services 9793 1 ,477.22 Glenn Smith Consulting Services 82.34 Standard.Brands Paint Company P Y Paint for Purisima Residence ;7%5 260,000.00 Stewart Title Company Purchase of land Property Claims No. 86-14 Meeting 86-18 Date: July 23, 1986 Amount Name Description REVISED 9796 182.73 Times-Tribune Notice of Election Advertisement 9737 17.09 Tools-R-Us Field Equipment 9798 388.51 Uno Graphics Brochure Printing 9799 91 .36 Unocal Fuel for District Vehicles 93CO 2,083.90 Utility Body Company Installations on District Vehicle 9301 49.98 Vallen Safety Supply Safety Equipment - 91302 145.00 Charles Vander Kooi Seminar--Mary Gundert 9303 195.00 Lindsay Emerson/Skyline Ranch Water Service 9304 140.00 West Coast Shoe Company Uniform Expense 9305 1 ,278.18 Xerox Corporation Maintenance and Supplies 9;)06 888.40 Yardbird Equipment Sales Field Equipment and Repairs 9307 2,120.00 Yeager Ford Tractor Equipment Rental 9303 69.23 ZZZ Sanitation Company Sanitation Services 9809 500.00 Foss and Associates Personnel Consulting Fee--June 9310 201 .25 Petty Cash Field Supplies, Uniform Expense, Private Vehicle Expense, Meal Conferences and Office Supplies 1 l R-86-62 (Meeting 86-19 oe August 13 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT August 4 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; J. Boland, Operations Supervisor SUBJECT: Appointment of Peace Officer Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the attached Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Appointing Peace Officer appointing Craig Beckman as a peace officer pursuant to Section 830 . 31 (b) of the Penal Code of the State of Califor- nia. Discussion: At your meeting of January 14 , 1976, you accepted the recommendation that District rangers be appointed as peace officers as outlined under Section 830 .31 (b) of the Penal Code of the State of California (see report R-76-2 , dated January 7 , 1976) . Craig Beckman, the District 's newest Ranger, has completed the necessary courses required under the Penal Code. This course completion and the passage of the attached resolution will qualify him as a peace officer. RESOLUTION NO. 86-44 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSOF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT APPOINTING PEACE OFFICER The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does hereby resolve as follows : 1. The following person is hereby designated as a peace officer of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District pursuant to Section 830.31 (b) of the Penal Code of the State of Cali- fornia and under Sections 5558 and 5561 of the Public Re- sources Code of the State of California, to enforce the Regulatory Ordinance for Use of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District lands and any applicable federal, State and local laws : Craig Beckman R-86-57 (Meeting 86-19 August 13 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT July 24 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Final Adoption of the Interim Use and Management Plan for the Davidson Property Addition to El Sereno Open Space Preserve. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the Interim Use and Manage- ment Plan for the Davidson property addition to El Sereno Open Space Preserve, including the naming, as contained in report R-86-36. I fur- ther recommend that you indicate your intention to withhold the property from dedication as public open space at this time. Discussion: At your June 11, 1986 meeting you approved the acquisition of 1. 33 acre Davidson property addition to El Sereno Open Space Pre- serve (see attached report R-86-36 of June 3 , 1986) . You also tenta- tively adopted the Interim Use and Management Plan for the addition, named the property an addition to El Sereno Open Space Preserve, and indicated your intention to withhold the land from dedication as public open space. In accordance with your adopted Land Acquisition Notification Proce- dures, final adoption of the Interim Use and Management Plan was defer- red until after close of escrow to allow further for public comment. Escrow on the Davidson property closed on July 10 , 1986 . Staff has received no public comment since that time. R-86-36 Alt (Meeting 86-15 � "' June 11 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT June 3 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: C. Britton, Assistant General Manager PREPARED BY: D. Woods , Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Proposed Davidson Property Addition to the El Sereno Open Space Preserve Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the accompanying Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Authorizing Acceptance of Purchase Agreement, Authorizing Officer to Execute Certificate of Acceptance of Grant to District, and Authorizing General Manager to E—Yecute Any and All Other Documents Necessary to Closing of the Transaction (El Sereno Open Space Preserve - Davidson Property) . E I further recommend that, you tentatively adopt the Interim Use and Manage- ment Plan recommendations contained in this report, including naming the property as an addition to the El Sereno Open Space Preserve, and indicate your intention to withhold the property from dedication. Introduction: The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District presently has the opportunity ortun1 tY to pur chase e a parc el of la nd 1. 33 acres in size. Situated near the El Sereno Open Space Preserve's Bohlman Road entrance, the property is located southwest of the Town of Saratoga within unin- corporated Santa Clara County. Successful acquisition of the ro ert P P Y would give the District the potential for expanding public access at the Bohlman Road entrance to the Preserve. A. Description of the Site 1. Size, Location and Boundaries This 1. 33 acre property is located southwest of the Town of Saratoga within the Town of Monte Sereno sphere of influence and near the western boundary of the El Sereno Open Space Preserve (see attached maps) . Small private parcels surround the property and include a 1 . 3 acre parcel with a residence situated between the subject property and the Preserve boundary. Approximately one half of the small parcels along Bohlman Road in the immediate area near the Preserve ' s entrance are residen- tially developed. i -36-36 Page two 2. Topography, Geology and 'Natural Landscape The 110 foot wide property is bisected by the road entering the Preserve. A relatively level grassy area is located on the property to the north of the road, and steep chaparral-covered slopes are located to the south. The south facing slopes are vegetated with typical chaparral plants of chamise, ceanothus, and coffeeberry. The San Andress rift zone is located in Lyndon Canyon, approxi- mately one-third mile to the southwest. 3. Access Rights The western end of the El Sereno Open Space Preserve is acces- sible from the end of Bohlman Road across a private roadway. Prior to this acquisition, the District 's rights for patrol and maintenance have been prescriptive. Also, this road system has been used by members of the public as part of the local trail system and prescriptive rights for trail purposes seem well established . The Davidson property as well as the recently acquired Pule-.; property include formal, appurtenant roadway easement riG!^_'rs which legitimizes the District' s patrol and maintenance access. At this time it is uncertain that the District could invite general public vehicular access; however, some limiter -:reh_ -uiar access , possibly on a permit basis , may fall within 'a-he scope of the private rights of the District and not constitute an overburden of the easement. B. Plannincr Consid.eru--ions The property is zoned Rl (residential) by the County of Santa Clara. The property is rated moderate to high on the District' s Master Plan map, a composite rating system ranking the suitability of land for open space protection. The road through the property is shown on the Santa Clara County Regional Parks, Trails and Scenic Highways Plan as an existing trail. C. Current Use and Development The only development on the property is the existing dirt road which bisects the property into northern and southern sections. The southern piece is in the natural state; the northern area, approxi- mately one-third acre in size, could support the development of a residential structure. There are no structures on the property. A forty-foot-wide access easement extends along the Bohlman Road extension from the end of Bohlman Road through the subject property. D. Potential Use and Management Due to its location near an existing access to the Preserve, this property has the potential for expanding the access to include some degree of parking. ... _•rti x r) .a� \ .1X. J - :j L. •�lA /.'L.\��-�e• III,�'` / 1 l\ • f 1 �' •.. kE nJs . ��l! 14_ \LI„�Ir � ""�`,1� ( - �_� (l � -�.,.\• ;� �.ana�salnfi' ' n,.. - •' � S .._ `�• `� Gam;'' ^ 11 ._ � ( ,��1 ' ..: /� .,::: I'Yn t U High I`\ \�z '`Jyt� � �� .�.-�'�'� I r� lC--_\`j�0 �\/�., '1 -�1\It's ,y����. ♦ �,. % `�.-/-�/1 n:\�\� � .�MI ! l).SCh ,t.�''�,3•: �\>`\ O })�i_. I, _ L.� =-� ��_ :`�Q^\��i,�/��j .:1 Ir�(�(%'•�� �'_ I �.�`� \IE„e `. \.\ �.\ l: ` .', �.-�S L'r.� I'�l � •:;:�: 2If C7 - 'wp. Lf - �� '� -/' `-�,�� �rvQ `! '%%_� 11`L•,.,���/ ,11�- � 4'�,1. _'1`��>1 l ( �''" _/ �• f/`' y���,/� f�l`�`\. \ ' I! i-J}` t -J ( ;� (^`__ � V �,-•.4 t <�\�C ., _ ,Gonventl` �� }• \ ; �� i-' �. ,t. ; � �'� - 1,--, ��� ' \\��! � %�) ; ���., � - � ! �� �/� �' .• �: PROPOSED ADDITION i• 1 ! r • �. ,, <� �1'Sere '?�:�`- �.�� t4�..;.?�(j,�1I ,r1,`<< -- � � \t\_ - -- --- ---- "'• -/- r �'j ' �'i O en'' �r ONE t/ ) ut l\ _� I ��/ \ I ���, � I r : 'Ir l I Sly l • ... ( 5 ` �� ' •. � ..�•; .�P '.: �. �.�(jy' ,, �' I ��� �, it�1t\I� �l i�_ _'�: : -J/� J i Do, TO •..,, � J � • � '1• � 11•� r 1• T,T a ;!„i4� _,_ -- �.� � :, I Y32 5is 1111, i v ..C.°� '.♦ �� �. 43 rP YIv, EL SERCNO •,� i .•� � � � �> •',\fit, /-- -� �. ._,� OPEN SPACE PRESERVE: ( r'';�;• _ `.J ' `:l'�. afGi�1,' �'�(. SCALE Ill - 20001 NUI:II I J11 �.. 31 1 JJ ' I �N`�s,�a r r ~\� 111•r((�71 ' � ' - � ,\ V t l �iR�YrrrhtTTRl'fi� (T` I 7.• '�' • 1j1 ` 1 i�'�,T,T•i`i—'Y �I- ,i T(�r �TYT4 \T.-�'(�i�l ll l l'11�T'i�i'��'!,��75 rf'. R-86-36 Page three E. Interim Use and Management Recommendations 1. Boundary plaques will be installed as necessary. F. Name The property should become an addition to the El Sereno Open Space Preserve and become known by that name. G. Dedication This property should be withheld from dedication as public open space to allow for future transfer of development rights or to allow for trade of part or all of the property if advisable when the final boundaries of the Pr eserve in this area are established. H. Terms The total purchase price as stipulated in the attached Purchase Agreement would be $50 ,000 payable in cash at the close of escrow. Funds for this purchase would come from the New Land Commitments budget category. R-86-58 (Meeting 86-19 Vk August 13, 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT July 24 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Final Adoption of the Interim Use and Management Plan for the Cunningham Property Addition to the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the Interim Use and Manage- ment Plan for the Cunningham property addition to the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve, including the naming, as contained in re- port R-86-41. I further recommend that you indicate your intention to dedicate the property as open space. Discussion: At your June 18, 1986 meeting you accepted the gift of the 1. 33 acre Cunningham property addition to the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve (see attached report R-86-41 of June 9, 1986) . You also tentatively adopted the Interim Use and Management Plan for the addi- tion, named the property an addition to the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve, and indicated your intention to dedicate the land as open space. In accordance with the adopted Land Acquisition Notification Procedures, final adoption of the Interim Use and Management Plan was deferred until after close of escrow to allow further for public comment. Escrow on the Cunningham property closed on July 22 , 1986. Staff has received no public comment since that time. R-86-41 (Meeting 86-16 All June 18, 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT June 9 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: C. Britton, Land Acquisition Manager; D. Hansen, Land Manager; and A. Cummings , Environmental Analyst SUBJECT: Proposed Cunningham Property Addition to Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the accompanying Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Mid peninsula eninsul a Regional open Space ace District Accepting n�_=_ oil Real Property, Authorizing Officer to Execute Certificate of `_cceptance of Grant to District, and Authorizing General manager to ExTo,te Any and All Other Documents Necessary to Closing of the Tr.=.nsact .on (Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve - Cunningham Property) . I further rec=enfb that you tentatively adopt the Interim Use and Management Plan recon--,iendations contained in this report, including naming the property as an addition to the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve and indicate your intention to dedicate the property as open space. Introduction: The District has been offered a gift of a 1. 3 acre lot adjacent to the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve. The lot is part of a prominent ridgeline overlooking the Rogue Valley area of the Preserve. If acquired, the property would become an addition to the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve. (See attached maps. ) A. Description 1 . Size, Location and Boundaries The 1. 3 acre lot is located near the end of Ravensbury Avenue in unincorporated Santa Clara County. The Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve adjoins the property to the south and east, while private property is located to the north. The lot fronts on Ravensbury Avenue to the west. A locked and gated driveway leads from Ravensbury Avenue through the length of the property to a private residence on the ridge. 2 . Topography, Geology and Natural Landscape This long narrow lot is located on the south facing slope of a ridge overlooking Rogue Valley and the upper Permanente Creek watershed. Permanente Creek is located approximately 400 feet to the south. Elevations range from 800 feet along the ridge- top to 440 feet above Permanente Creek. The lower portion of R-86-41 Page two the lot is covered with oak woodland forest with a dense understory of poison oak and other shrubs. Grassland inter- spersed with some chaparral plants grows on the drier south .c facing slopes above Ravensbury Avenue. B. Planning Considerations The lot is located; in unincorporated Santa Clara County within the sphere of influence of the Town of Los Altos Hills. It is zoned HS (hillside) and is developable with a density of one single family home. The property received a moderate rating on the District's Master Plan map, a composite rating indicating the suitability of the land for open space. C. Current Use and Development The site is currently undeveloped with the exception of a 25-foot-wide driveway. The driveway enters the western side of the property from Ravensbury Avenue and cuts through the center of the property, exiting near the northeast corner. This driveway is an easement to an adjacent private residence. D. Potential Use andDevelopment The property is vi-sible from the trails within the Permanente Creek watershed of Ranc_-_c� San Antonio Open Space Preserve. The acqui- sition of this 7_=perty would help preserve the ridgetop views and eliminate --he Potential for an additional residential structure on the ridge. ir addition, the property permits greater protection of the Preserve ' s entry area at Ravensbury Avenue and offers greater flibil4 +-V " -- in the redesign of the Ravensbury entrance to the Preserve currently being completed by a planner under contract to the District. E. Interim Use and Management Recommendations 1. The site will be managed as a natural area. 2 . Preserve boundary plaques will be installed at any appropriate points. F. Name The property will become an addition to the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve and be known by that name. G. Dedication The site is intended to be dedicated as public open space. H . Terms Mrs . Cunningham, the current owner of this property, has generously offered to give this residential homesite to the District. Her original offer was forwarded to the District from the Town of Los Altos Hills. Los Altos Hills and particularly the current Town Manager, George Scarborough , have been very helpful and encouraging in securing this gift of land. R-86-63 (Meeting 86-19 A. August 13 , 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT August 6 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; D. Woods, Open Space Planner; A. Cummings , Environmental Analyst; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Final Adoption of the Revised Use and Management Plan for San Mateo County Baylands Reserve and Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Study Area. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the Revised Use and Management Plan for the San Mateo County Baylands lands Reserve and the Stevens Creek Shore- line Nature Study Area as contained in report R-86-55 of July 17, 1986 and as amended herein, including the contingent name change for the San Mateo County Baylands Reserve to Ravenswood Open Space Preserve. Introduction: At your July 23 1986 meeting, tho proposed Revised Use and Management Plan for San Mateo County Baylands Reserve and Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Study Area were presented by staff and tentatively adopted by you. Three suggested minor changes have been made to the summary charts for New and Revised Use and Management Projects Now Being Considered for both the San Mateo County Baylands Reserve and Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Study Area. The proposed changed entries are as follows: USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY CHART - Ravenswood Open Space Preserve A. New and Revised Use and Management Projects Now Being Considered Proposed Site Projects Funding Funding Anticipated Project FY 85/86 FY -86/87 FY 87/88 Schedule Project/Funding Notes 1. Parking area at Bay Road Su 87 San Mateo County to construct; CCC to fund 3. Signing $350 Su 87 Following CCC improvements USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY CHART - Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Study Area A. New and Revised Use and Management Projects Now Being Considered Proposed Site Projects Funding Funding Anticipated Project FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87/88 Schedule Prolect/Fundine Notes 3. Directional signs Ask Mountain Viet to Preserve to install in park R-86-63 Page 2 A major change not considered at the time of the first review is a proposed naming change for the San Mateo County Baylands Reserve. The site naming and gift recognition policies allow changes in the naming of preserves , especially if a designation is too general and confusing, as it sometimes is for this site. At one time, the area was named as a loca- tion for a County park in the County's General Plan, and it is still con- fused for a County rather than District site. The original site name presented in the Interim Use and Management Plan was the "Cooley Landing Open Space Preserve" ; however, it was felt that this was too specific a name, and thus it was changed to the current designation. Since that time, the federal Fish and Wildlife Service has named the new "fishing pier at Dumbarton Bridge the "Ravenswood Pier. " After researching the name "Ravenswood" , staff feels it is an appropriate name to apply to the surrounding preserve, as well. A history of the Town of Ravenswood is attached for your perusal. I am recommending that the Reserve be tentatively named the Ravenswood Open Space Preserve. As a matter of courtesy, the proposed name change and attached history would be sent to the Cities of East Palo Alto and Menlo Park, which may have a special interest. If they voice no problem with the name after a two month comment period, the name would become permanent. 7 D Radio Tower D �� O S EVA TORS enio Park+ ran '' •;se V z /1 t) Landing t — V f :Bay ns% -- .' • - Eel � ��HETCH HETCHV II r r• or+1yE -- >! ■ �- i j=�� t1 Far el� 1 \ \ •��,soma■ �(_�` I io S p�tanon• \ � � \MUD Gwen b ;�4 .: t-_� it srh h# z �cl.. V / I 1LL sus k 8 (` ` — •,—•' 1 , !r 4 o'a•o - _ '��* 'r -fib• Il S. MUD ♦ � ���� �"`_ ^ e ta--- ---� r 1. � 'F }AN aq �_ ti (—�—� , _•� /� <I` bLE2:L)PARK, i -�•T 3 v Ma Mud %k� h _..r..-- fALQALt�► rr • • , X t: , /,� _ ■ #� �`\ — Sand Point L • vN + Bte6t ood �. LO,A • \ AL —1 h Seh Y 5 � r- �-�'1;��T:���Natlf. � � Jos. I •: �' %// � '� � �.., �<tti v BM. OV SIM Historic tidelands and Ravens- 4� wood Wharf (18 4 8) projected on - current USGS map of the area. jam, ' �% ` : 1 _ a p o sposa • I August 1986 ��►e# . �y`, '� �► Nn +ve 14 Sets �c ��� Have you studied the situation at RAVE,,NSWOOD ? , Do you appreciate that it is the Best Townsite on the Pacific Coast ? Then have you inquired as to Property Prices and found that lots are cheaper now _ than ANV W H E RE else on the Peninsula ? r If so you must already own , your lot for you recognized it as the height of folly to let suclk*an opportunity pass. If not, take the time now -, to do so before prices are forced up. Come in and let us take you through Ravens- wood today. Ravenswood Investment Co. Inc. Parkinson Bldg, Palo .Alto. History and Origin of the Name "Ravenswood" The Town of Ravenswood was located at the end of Bay Road where Cooley Landing is now. It was the only place in the area where good unmarshy land came within easy reach of deep water and promised to be a good red- wood lumber shipping port. A 1500 foot wharf was built here in 1848. In 1851 the Town was surveyed and divided into streets and lots. It was the first town laid out in what is now San Mateo County. Isaiah C. Woods owned over 2000 acres of land nearby (the former Stein- Berger property and part of Rancho Las Pulgas, the largest Spanish land grant in the County) . It was he who probably coined the name "Ravenswood" . Woods was a member of the firm of Adams and Company, a banking and express business in San Francisco. Lots were sold and houses erected in Ravenswood, using lumber from the mills of Dennis Martin and Charles Brown. Streets included Woods , Haskell, and Charles , and a large store was opened by William Paul. One 60 ton side- wheeler steamer known as the Jenny Lind operated between San Francisco, Ravenswood, and Alviso, financed by Adams & Company. In 1853 , its boilers exploded killing 31 passengers, destroying the boat and contributing to Ravenswood's decline as a port. In 1855, Adams & Company failed. Woods , disguised as a woman, reportedly fled to Australia with a bundle of the bank's money - less $80,000 he gave up at gun point. When he heard the bank was failing, Woods removed sacks of gold from the office and hid them in a building on his Woodside dairy. Maurice Dooley, a stagecoach owner who had $80 ,000 on deposit with the bank, followed Woods to his hoard, persuading him at gunpoint to return the deposit. On September 25 , 1856 , Woods dressed up as a woman and boarded a ship bound for Australia. His Ravenswood property was disposed of at a sheriff 's sale. In spite of this setback, Ravenswood prospered during the 1850 's and was the best known port down the bay shore. It was bolstered by talk of ex- tending the Central Pacific Railroad from Sacramento across the bay to Ravenswood by ferry or bridge. In 1868 , the land was bought by Lester P. Cooley because of the hope of the railroad terminating there. His property extended from the present intersection of University Avenue and Bay Road to the bay. Cooley established his home there on a large farm and the wharf became known as Cooley's Landing. It was an important shipping point for lumber, grain and hay for many years. However, eventually the railroad was completed to San Jose, diverting most San Jose shipping from Ravenswood. In 1875, Ravenswood had a second brief revival when a brickworks was estab- lished at the present site of Jack Farrell Park by Hunter, Shackleford & Co. It furnished bricks for the Palace Hotel in San Francisco, and the clay pit was visible long afterwards. But the brick business died when Redwood City took over as the County 's chief port for shipping lumber and farm prod- ucts. A third revival which lasted longer came in 1916 . Charles Weeks bought the land, named it Runnymede, and set up a poultry colony that promised "health, wealth, and contentment" on an acre of land. The area was divided into a number of small chicken farms . The name Ravenswood came to be used for the whole area north of San Fran- cisquito Creek, including Runnymede and what was known as North Palo Alto. It was "noted for the production of poultry, eggs , rabbits, and berries as well as for its high type of citizen. " The wharf finally rotted, and its site was later buried under the debris of the San Mateo County dump. The dump was closed in 1958 as part of antismog measures. At this time, a committee called the "Ravenswood City Committee" sought to organize the area east of Bayshore into a City of Ravenswood, but failed. There are several modern uses of the name "Ravenswood. " The USGS map shows Ravenswood Point just north of the Dumbarton Bridge approach. Rav- enswood Slough is mainly north of the approach but historically extended to the south into an area called the "Ravenswood Triangle" in connection with the new approach road construction to the new Dumbarton Bridge. The area north of the approach is called the Ravenswood National Wildlife Area and the old Dumbarton Bridge has been converted into the "Ravenswood Fish- ing Pier. " Both areas are parts of the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge. There is also a Ravenswood Avenue in Menlo Park, and a Ravenswood School in East Palo Alto. 1 R-86- 59 1 (Meeting 86-19 August 13 , 1986) Date: 24 July 1986 To: Board of Directors From: Hanko, Bishop, Wendin(Land Acquisition Policy Committee) Subj. Results of Questionnaire on Brovn Act, Sphere of Influence and Annexation. ? Your committee met on July 1, 1986 to review the results of the answers turned in by six Board members. The questionnaire served its purpose in clarifying the issues vhich require further discussion by the Board, Our analysis of the responses and the issues raised follovs. We recommend that these be discussed at a meeting when at least six Board members, and preferably all, are present. 1. All Board members accepted the fact that there should be a list. Tventy acres vas the only alternative given as the threshold for inclusion and this seemed acceptable to everyone. We should at least touch on vhether a different threshold should be used but staff believes that twenty is workable. 2. The key issue relative to the list is what criteria to use in creating exceptions (if any)to inclusion on the list for properties which exceed the threshold acreage. Each of the following should be discussed as potential criteria for an exception, operating alone or vith one of the otae _. a. Properties in clearly defined developed communities, with or without a request to be removed. (If this is to be an exception then ve must discuss the issue of hov to handle the time before this concept has been defined, at the earliest sometime in 1987. This is the subject of paragraph 3 below.) b. Subdividable versus not subdividable. c. Improved versus unimproved. i 3. If properties in clean defined developed communities are candidates for P Pe y P'� removal from the list, then ve need to discuss vhat policy to have before that concept has been defined. The folloving possibilities should be discussed: a. Wait- the properties remain on the list(unless they meet another exception, if any). b. Interim criteria can be adopted such as one or more of the folloving, recogmzing that the property may be returned to the list after the concept has been defined: i) By request of ovner. ii) Based on acreage. iii) Occupied. s iv) Ovner occupied. v) Subdividable vs non-subdividable. E 4. For properties not on the list there vas no consensus as to vhen to announce that the property vill be discussed in closed session. The choices presented vere at the beginning of the meeting and just before the closed session. There vas little support for listing the properties on the agenda. t 5. There vas also no consensus as to hov the property ovner should be given notice for a property not on the list. The issues to be discussed are the form of the notice (written versus oral)and the time in advance of the meeting that the notice is to be given. 6. There vas little support for additional notice of planned discussions for properties on the list, either to the public or the property ovner. i 7. There vas unanimity that the list should be re-adopted at least annually. S. The potential of seeking additional legislation needs discussion. There vas no consensus on this subject. E 9. There vas a consensus that publication of changes in our policies relating to the Brovn Act should be similar to that for changes to our eminent domain policy, which includes written notice to ovners of properties on the existing and future list. 10. a. There vas a strongconsensus supporting use of an mode of acquisition PPo � y q for properties at least 50%vithin the District. b. For properties less than 50%within the District, there vas a consensus on accepting gifts and in participating with other agencies on trails and open space easements. The other forms of acquisition had medium to strong support but not a consensus, and therefore need discussion. c. For properties wholly outside the District, there vas little support for acquisitions of any kind except by gift(strong consensus)or as part of a joint project(no consensus- needs discussion). 11. There vas a consensus that minor extensions of the District's sphere of influence could be approved by our Board and LAFCC. Hovever there vas a split on vhether Board and LAFCD approval is enough for major extensions or a District-vide vote is required. 12. The Board seemed to respv.-A to the annexation questions vith a consensus as follows: a. Our Board will not inititiate an annexation vithout the consent of all property owners involved. b. An annexation initiated by petition or LAFCD will be considered by the our Board. 13. The difference between major annexations and minor ones vas not brought out in the questionnaire. This needs discussion, especially the issue of vhether a District-vide vote will be required for major annexations. I i R-86-64 (Meeting 86-19 Nb August 13, 1986) i MW MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT August 5, 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; D. Woods, Open Space Planner; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Review of the Use and Management Plans for the Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area of the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve and for the Foothills Open Space Preserve Recommendation: I recommend that you tentatively adopt the Revised Use and Management Plan as amended in this report for the Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area of the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve and for the Foothills Open Space Preserve. Introduction: The Use and Management Plans for the Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area of the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve and for the Foothills Open Space Preserve were last reviewed at your March 9, 1983 meeting. Final adoption of the plans, which have always been considered jointly, occurred at your March 23, 1983 meeting. There has been one addition to the Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area since your last review: the acquisition of open space easements from the Trust for Hidden Villa. The Preserve is 1400 acres in size with 639 acres in open space easements and 761 acres in fee simple ownership. Foothills Open Space Preserve encompasses 181 acres . The following reports are available for reference: o Use and Management Plan Review for Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area of Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve and for Foothills Open Space Preserve, report R-83-10 of February 25, 1983 . o Lands of the Trust for Hidden Villa (formerly Hidden Villa, Inc. ) - Acquisition of Open Space Easements, report R-83-46 of November 17 , 1983 . DUVENECK WINDMILL PASTURE AREA Site Description and Use The Preserve (see attached map) continues to be popular with local equestrians, hikers, and more recently, mountain bikers . General use has increased steadily over the past several years , due in part to the addition of the former Cho property to the Rancho San Antonio Preserve. The Trust for Hidden Villa continues to use this area for overnight visitation as a part of their summer camp program. Prior to completion of the Black Mountain Camp, the meadow area of this Preserve was used R-86-64 Page two exclusively for their overnights. However, a shift is occurring, and Hidden Villa is beginning to use Monte Bello Open Space Preserve more and the Windmill Pasture Area less for their camping trips . Some problem usage on the Preserve occurs from illegal motorcycle entry through the adjacent Neary quarry. Attempts to block the accessway with barricades have been unsuccessful; however, conversations with the new part owner of the Neary property indicate a willingness to address the issue and develop a permanent barrier for the area. Unauthorized overnight camping is also an occasional problem during the summer months . Generally, however, through the work of the resident caretaker living off Rhus Ridge Road, site problems remain at a minimum. Planning Considerations A controlling interest in the adjacent 300 acre Neary property has been sold to De Anza Properties. They intend to develop the land after termination of the Williamson Act contract in 1992, unless it is possible to be excused earlier. The development would most likely entail annexing the currently unincorporated property to the Town of Los Altos Hills. This project, because of its valuable scenic and recreational values is being closely monitored by both Acquisition and Land Management staff. Hidden Villa hired 2M Associates in 1985 to prepare a Master Plan for their facility, and this plan was completed in early July. The three phased project evaluates the educational programs, building facilities, and natural resources of Hidden Villa and provides suggestions for streamlining the programs , increasing revenues , managing the land, and laying out facilities . Hidden Villa also received an $88 ,000 Proposition 18 grant for the development of an interpretive center. The construction on the Center is scheduled to begin in June 1987 . District staff has invited Hidden Villa to make a presentation of their new plan to you at a future Board meeting. Access and Circulation New or Revised Use and Management Recommendations 1. Staff will work with De Anza Properties, holders of a controlling interest in the Neary property, to block the illegal motorcycle access onto the property through the adjacent quarry. 2 . Staff will continue to monitor the development plans for the Neary- De Anza property. It is anticipated that a series of public meetings will occur following submittal of a conceptual plan to the Town of Los Altos Hills . Staff will work toward preserving as much of the land for open space as possible, paying particular interest to the ridge system adjacent to current District lands . 3. District staff will study trail plan alternatives for connecting the trails on the Rancho San Antonio Preserve with the Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area trails . Signing New or Revised Use and Management Recommendations 1. District staff will install trail directional signs at the trail junctions on the Preserve. Cost is estimated at $200 with funding included in the fiscal year 1986-1987 budget. R-86-64 Page three 2 . District staff will work with the homeowners along Rhus Ridge Road to install a directional sign for motorists looking for the Preserve. The sign will be designed to clarify a confusing turn in the road. Cost is estimated at $50, and funding will be included in fiscal year 1987-1988 budget preparation. Use and Management Plan summary charts for the Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area are attached for your review. FOOTHILLS OPEN SPACE PRESERVE Site Use and Description_ Visitor use remains at a moderate level. The site was included in the dog experimental program several years ago but appears to receive little use from canines and owners . The primary attraction of the site is the view from the knoll, which, unfortunately, makes this a popular nighttime spot. This illegal use includes camping, shooting, and littering, while daytime use is generally from picnickers . Access and Circulation A trail planning committee for the City of Palo Alto has recommended a trail route for development which would extend from the Arastra Preserve along Arastradero Road to the northern tip of the Los Trancos Preserve. The tentative trail route would affect two of the District' s Preserves if built as planned, namely, Los Trancos and Foothills Open Space Preserves. The trail would generally parallel the north side of Page Mill Road through the Foothills Preserve. New or Revised Use and Management Recommendations 1. District staff will work with the City of Palo Alto to facilitate the construction of a trail from the Arastra Preserve to the District's Los Trancos Preserve crossing Foothills open Space Preserve and Foothills Park. The trail will be recommended for funding in the next Capital Improvement Program budget for the City. A specific plan, when available, will be brought back to you for approval. Use and Management Plan summary charts for the Foothills Open Space Preserve are attached for your review. .•si::}.ti'-ti• *.-3\i}vr ca: '•:7:•� ::'w•� ''ye`: ��'"'.•.•.r•::w '.'�:•�3�.,r.-,�/,•: :tit.::':. '?? +:`v:•f::�`.;} ':;kt;4'r.;:.5•: f{,�^^� S:_�'._r/b `�, �3�°Oa -�V• iv j A� r! � •4�'�`� 'W e i9r .. \\`''.L'"a.. rV'�•-;•�:.�..� •�-•.'� i6,� ,�(.��.%:`:`•� `,;.• 4 / /' •- ' l y •...� � ` C—_` ��. a�..'�*, Pftu i ate` . :v�,,'� �`\�r a +��x ut eb ✓in EcJ�g h t- TH I LLS r = �y .35 c a OPARK ?\ r- ��, -'1 y Mt el {t I • r. FOOTHILLS OPEN ' v to .; d° '� � •� vSPACE PRESERVE HIDDEN VILLA INC. EASEMENT `� - "` _�► 1 m ii 4 o \ a ..- ! `--•� ���� � 1, � 1 p ��b ` ` �! Hal. I ::Zo HIDDEN VILLA INC. EASEMENT 1 DWENECK WINDMILL PASTURE AREA ��_- i� � 1\ 2� /aoa�.•. 10 i ...ter-..._�.-'.,". • �..__ ` l � 11 ~' � � _ _ J: l •tia•1 c LOS TRANCOS p Ib U J €YOPEN_SPACE PRESERVE a� Ann ---77 ✓;�� -1 �� MONTE BELLO OPEN SPACE_PRESERVE177 � �, � �. ,aka �0 00 t•1`'�� _ �� -.\ �� � � � '��ll \ `'•' 41, F• �\f��- 1 / 26�5x� yip w / `'• ✓r,;.� '� "\ Z� �� � � !' �,\1aa 4�N,� � Y.6e3eta_ 1 j�l \, / ✓ rh ) la`m f ,may' �� � T� ♦ /,ii%' /�'�� 1li7f Site blap FOCT--iII'I OPEN SPACE PRESERVE l Dogs Permitted Here l � �'\�y"�....�< r E.,-.,\ _ � \ �i`„ 1f � aM1 zs/z�� t,�'1��;raj � -;�••:•- P Lirlited Parkin ;1 v [—Scale 111=20 0 0 1 North �;.;::._L•. �::a?•:tip::}:•.. t :r'"'};@:::= •oa3"�.}p „•;;•-_-•, _ ._ �_ �'�YTc^__"fre=...es- — -_ - _ _.w i'�. •J�:;•t..\•/Is:'lw" ,�•�•T:• �...i.�.� .�..•«.•r::ti•:•..::..Y,•SStL�T.GR v:}'`=+..u �:2 5..�-':n"tt�'•..'. R-86-64 USE AND MANAGEMOU PLAN SUMMARY CHART - DUVENECK WINDMILL PASTURE AREA A. New or Revised Use and Management Projects Now Being Considered Anticipated Proposed Site Projects Funding Funding Funding Project FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87/88 Schedule Project/Funding Notes 1. Trail plan-RSA. 86/87 Concurrent with Neary connection subdivision 2. Trail directional $ 85 $ 200 Wi 86 signs 3. Parking directional 100 Su. 87 Rhus Ridge Road signs 4. Block motorcycle work with De Anza access - quarry Properties 5. Monitor development De Anza property B. Incomplete Existing Use and Management Projects Anticipated Proposed Site Projects Funding Funding Funding Project FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87/88 Schedule Project/Funding Notes 1. Replace vane/rotor $ 1200 Fa 86 Contractor contacted 2. Signs/parking area $ 85 200 Su 86 Sign on order 3. Stile-quarry trail 250 250 Drop Quarry stable closed 4. Resource-fire manage- Pending comprehensive RMP. ment. plan Starthistle bad 5. Hidden Villa open Pending - includes Black space easements Mountain trail easement C. Completed Existing Use and Management Projects Anticipated Proposed Site Projects Funding Funding Funding Project FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87/88 Schedule Project/Funding Notes 1. Trail signs - Hidden Villa Sp 84 Hidden Villa funded D. Annual Use and Management Projects Anticipated Proposed Site Projects Funding Funding Funding Project FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87/88 Schedule Project/Funding Notes 1. Road maintenance $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 Ongoing 2. Trail maintenance 500 500 500 Ongoing Rerouted Olive Tree entrance, base Black Mountain trail 3. Sign maintenance 100 100 100 Ongoing 4. Fence/gate maintenance 300 300 Ongoing 5. Brochure printing 250 200 250 Ongoing 6. Patrol contract 4200 4200 4200 Ongoing 7. Hidden Villa Ongoing 3 overnights 86/87 Camp Program R-86-64 Page five USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN SLMPM CHART- FOOTHILLS OPEN SPACE PRESERVE A. New or Revised Use and Management Projects Now Being Considered Anticipated Proposed Site Projects Funding Funding Funding Project FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87/88 Schedule Project/Funding Notes 1. Trail connection - Palo Alto project Palo Alto Foothills Pk. B. Incomplete Existing Use and Management Projects Anticipated Proposed Site Projects Funding Funding Funding Project FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87/88 Schedule Project/Funding Notes 1. Realign fence Coordinate with Palo Alto. Former Guiffre property. Pending possible exchange. C. Completed Existing Use and Management Projects Anticipated Proposed Site Projects Funding Funding Funding Project FY 85/86 FY 86/87 FY 87/88 Schedule Project/Funding Notes 1. Clean-up Fa 83 Former Guiffre property D. Annual Use and Management Projects Anticipated Project Proposed Site Projects Funding Funding Funding Schedule Project/Funding Notes 1. Sign maintenance $100 $ 100 $ 100 Ongoing 2. Roadside clean-up Ongoing 3. Trail maintenance Ongoing R-86-61 dA. (Meeting 86-19 Noe August 13 , 1986) 0 KC MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT August 1, 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager CONTRIBUTORS: C. Britton, Land Acquisition Manager; D. Hansen, Land Manager; J. Fiddes, Administrative Services Manager; and M. Hale, Public Communications Coordinator SUBJECT: Program Evaluation for 1985-1986 Fiscal Year Recommendation: I recommend that you accept the program evaluation for the 1985-1986 fiscal year and adopt the proposed wording changes in the 1986-1987 Action Plan objectives for the Open Space Management Program. Discussion: The material for the second program evaluation session for the 1985-1986 fiscal year is attached. For each of the District"s programs and subprograms, staff has summarized progress for key pro- jects and activities for the full 1985-1986 fiscal year. In addition, the objectives and key projects--and activities which you adopted for 1986-1987 (see report R-86-33 of June 2, 1986) have been listed. There are no proposed changes in any of the key projects and activi- ties for this current fiscal year. The only proposed changes at this time involve minor wording changes in the objective statement for the Planning, Design and Development Subprogram and for the Operations , Maintenance and Volunteer Subpro- gram. The first change proposes the substitution of the words "for public access and interpretation" for the words "site development" , and the second change proposes the inclusion of the words "and other" to reflect the different types of support, including volunteer, that can aid in the physical implementation of capital improvements. The following sections highlight the activities for each of the programs for the second half of the 1985-1986 fiscal year. You reviewed progress for the first half of the year at your February 12 and 26 meetings (see report R-86-13 of February 5, 1986) . A. Open SRace Acquisition Program During the second half of the 1985-1986 fiscal year, the District acquired 564 acres of land, for a total purchase price of , $1,760,275 , an average of $3,120 per acre. These transactions included the Mazor and Jamison property additions to Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve and the Sackett/Atwood property addition to the El Sereno Open Space Preserve. The District also completed the Eilertsen property cooperative acquisition project, with the Town of Los Gatos funding one-half of the purchase price and acquisition costs for a total contribution of $115 ,000. The former Almaden Air Force Station project was completed, and the Bullis ranch was acquired. These transactions included $850 ,000 in private financing at an average 7% interest rate . R-86-61 Page two B. Open Space Management Program The Planning, Design and Development Subprogram continued in its major role of Use and Management Plan formulation and review in the second half of the fiscal year. Plans reviewed during the period included the Limekiln Canyon, Kennedy Road, and Mt. Umunhum Areas of the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve, and the Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve. The Hassler Preserve review, which was to have been completed, was rescheduled to the current fiscal year- since a public workshop had not yet been held. Pre-acquisition plans were also prepared for the District's seven acquisitions during the second half of the fiscal year, and staff completed all CEQA matters on District projects. Considerable planning and administrative time was spent on the Purisima Creek Preserve public access grant implementation, Master Plan items for the Skyline Ridge Preserve, the Mt. Umunhum, Hassler, and Los Gatos Creek Park access plans , and a grant proposal for access facili- ties at the San Mateo County Baylands Preserve. A planning time- table and plan of action was approved for amending the District' s Master Plan. The Open Space Management proposed Five Year Staffing Master Plan was also completed and folded into the spring' s budget deliberations . Further review of the staffing master plan is required, involving both the Budget Committee and the full Board. Special efforts were made by Open Space Management' s planning admini- strative staff to attend area meetings with neighbors on matters of concern, including meetings regarding the Long Ridge Preserve and the Mt. Umunhum Area of the Sierra Azul. Staff members continued to serve as the District' s liaison with the Midpeninsula Trails Council, the Santa Clara County Trails and Pathways Committee, and the Trails Information and Volunteer Center. Projects which were not completed in this Subprogram during the 1985-1986 fiscal year included the Kennedy Road Access planning, the trails standards and policies , and policies for resource management planning. The Operations, Maintenance, and Development Subprogram continued in its major role of providing responsible stewardship of District lands during the second half of the fiscal year. Approved and funded Use and Management Plan recommendations on both acquired and new acquisitions progressed well, and implementation continued to be on target, with the Ranger Aide program and increased volunteer support helping to keep implementation on schedule. Field staff monitored the District ' s experimental dog program and commenced security at the Mt. Umunhum facility. The plan for the redeployment of field staff was assessed in conjunction with the staffing plan with the subsequent addition of the District's thirteenth Ranger, the fourth Ranger Aide, and the upgrading of the Lead Ranger positions to Supervising Rangers . Field staff members have maintained a high patrol profile, supple- mented increased volunteer support for site development projects, and continued strong coverage of the 564 acres of new acreage acquired in the second half of the fiscal year. R-86-61 Page three Docent tours accommodated approximately 1200 people on several District sites , including Edgewood County Park and Windy Hill, Monte Bello, Fremont older, Rancho San Antonio, Skyline Ridge and Los Trancos Open Space Preserves . The major project not completed in this Subprogram during the 1985-1986 fiscal year was the completion of the written field policies. C. Communications Program Emphasis during the second half of the year was placed on analysis , planning, and research in conjunction with the presentation of new Action Plan program and budget proposals for Board consideration for fiscal year 1986-1987 . Proposals were developed and presented as a five-year communications plan. To determine the level of public interest and support for some of the new publications proposals , a special market survey was designed, produced, and mailed. The results of this survey, and a follow-up study will be tabulated and presented to the Board in fiscal year 1986-1987 . Preliminary returns, compared with "nor- mal" direct mail response rates of 1 to 10 per cent, are very high: 52 per cent. Early indications are that a strong majority, 80 per cent, favor one particular publications proposal. Thus far, 60 per cent indicated that they were even willing to pay for new comimncations on a subscription basis, even without seeing the first issue. Preliminary editorial and design work was begun on the District's new Land Acquisition Policy Brochure , on a revised color slide show for public presentations, on a revised All-Site Brochure, and on a special annual report issue of the Open SEace newsletter. Ongoing work with the media has continued to increase public aware- ness about the District and has promoted public interest in visiting the Preserves. A special research project to document the extent of the District's outreach and good neighbor efforts was begun. The results of this research will be presented during fiscal year 1986-1987. D. General Management and Program Support During the second half of the 1985-1986 fiscal year, a very signifi- cant amount of staff time within the General Management and Program Support section was devoted to space planning and the move to the District's new headquarters at the Old Mill Office Center. In addition, staff activities focused on the coordination and prepa- ration of the Action Plan, the hiring of a part-time receptionist, the annual salary survey, the budget, and the presentation of initial data and information to the Budget Committee on the employee fringe benefit study. District Controller M. Foster was very busy during the fiscal year's last few months preparing for and overseeing the $9 .5 million promissory note issue. The selection and purchase of the District's computer system was not completed during the second half of the fiscal year. R-86-61 Page four OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION PROGRAM Negotiations Sub2rogram 1985-1986 Key Projects and Activities 1. Eliminate the Previous Land Commitments backlog by completing the acquisition of the former Almaden Air Force Station at Mt. Umunhum. PROGRESS: Completed. 2. Convert the budgeted funds in the New Land Commitments budget cate- gory into strategic open space lands at desirable prices (fair market value or less) including, where possible, private financing with favorable terms. PROGRESS: Nineteen parcels totaling over 2,400 acres (including 13 acres of easement title and 98 acres of leasehold interest) were acquired in the 1985-1986 fiscal year at a cost of approximately $7, 000, 000 (an average of $2 ,900 per acre) . These purchases in- cluded use of over $300 ,000 in grant funds and $3,300 ,000 in private financing at rates varying from 7% to 9% over periods ranging from 5 to 10 years. A total of approximately $3,400 ,000 in cash was expended from the $4,600 ,000 New Land Purchase budget category, and the funds remaining from the 1985 note issues were exhausted. 3. Work with Peninsula Open Space Trust to complete at least one acqui- sition project within the District's Sphere of Influence that sig- nificantly furthers the District' s overall open space goals. PROGRESS: As a part of the acquisition of the 2.2 acre Closs prop- erty adjacent to Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve at Ravensbury Avenue, POST received the gift of an adjacent 4 acre lot. POST transferred the former Weber and Fernandez parcels which POST received as gifts, at the bargain price of $193,825 to match the District' s proceeds from the 1985-1986 SB 174 grant. At the District' s urging, POST also acquired the 80 acre Negley property for the future trail connection between the Long Ridge. Open Space Preserve and Portola State Park. The District received a cost-free 49 year lease from the State Lands Commission for a baylands parcel that was sold to the State by POST. 1986-1987 Objective The objective of the Negotiations Subprogram is to provide for the acqui- sition of all real property rights necessary to secure a recreational greenbelt in the foothills and baylands, utilizing the major portion of the District' s income. 1986-1987 Key Projects and Activities 1. Convert the budgeted funds in the New Land Commitments budget cate- gory into strategic open space lands at desirable prices (fair mar- ket value or less) , including, where possible, private financing with favorable terms. R-86-61 Page five 2. Work with Peninsula Open Space Trust to complete at least two acqui- sition projects within the District's Sphere of Influence that sig- nificantly further the District' s overall open space goals. 3. Implement new land acquisition policy relating to use of eminent domain, Brown Act implementation, annexation, and acquisition of lands outside the District's boundaries. R-86-61 Page six OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION PROGRAM Special Projects Subprogram 1985-1986 Key Projects and Activities 1. Complete the San Mateo County Baylands Reserve federal Land and Water Conservation Fund grant and keep abreast of other grants available to the District. Submit at least one Land and Water Conservation Fund grant request and at least one 1984 State Parks Bond Act grant request. PROGRESS: The Westbay Community Associates parcels were acquired, utilizing approximately one-half of the federal grant funds available. A Land and Water Conservation Fund grant acquisition application was submitted for purchase of the POST (formerly Thomas) parcel; the Grant request was subsequently turned down. The second phase of the 1984 State Parks Bond Act project (Weber and Fernandez par- cels) was completed under the SB 174 Roberti-Zlberg-Harris-funding. 2. Seek and encourage agencies and groups to undertake sole or joint acquisition projects which will preserve additional open space such as the San Mateo County section of the Bayfront Trail. PROGRESS: Continuing work with San Mateo County resulted in the County' s submission of a Coastal Conservancy Grant application that was prepared by the District staff. The grant application requests funds for trail right-of-way acquisition in Baylands area between Runnymede Street and Bay Road in East Palo Alto. The Eilertsen property in the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve was acquired on a cooperative basis; the Town of Los Gatos contributed half of the acquisition price and closing costs. Contact was renewed with Save-the-Redwoods League for future projects. 3. Analyze, in conjunction with Open Space Management Program, particu- lar geographic areas of the District, such as the San Mateo County Baylands north of Dumbarton Bridge, to develop acquisition recom- mendations and project costs. PROGRESS: Two areas southeast of Highway 17 were reviewed, and review of another area is in progress. An analysis of one area west of Skyline Boulevard was completed. No progress has been made on the area north of Dumbarton Bridge. 1986-1987 Objective The objective of the Special Projects Subprogram is to establish and maintain a broad base for the acquisition program by coordinating District efforts with private and other public agencies, to develop additional acquisition revenue sources, and to provide the critical information necessary to a successful acquisition program. 1986-1987 Key Projects and Activities 1. Complete the San Mateo County Baylands Reserve federal Land and Water Conservation fund grant project and keep abreast of other grants available to the District. Submit at least one Land and Water Conservation Fund grant request and at least one Roberti- Zlberq-Harris grant request. R-86-61 Page seven 2. Seek and encourage agencies and groups to undertake sole or joint acquisition projects which will preserve additional open space such as the San Mateo County section of the Bayfront Trail and a Joint project with the Town of Los Gatos. 3. Analyze, in conjunction with Open Space Management Program, par- ticular geographic areas of the District, such as the area south of Lexington Reservoir or north of Dumbarton Bridge, to develop acquisition recommendations and project costs. R-86-61 Page eight OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION PROGRAM Enterprise Activities Subprogram 1985-1986 Key Projects and Activities 1. Administer all leases and rental accounts, updating rental rates and other lease conditions as opportunities arise, to maximize income consistent with Open Space Management policies. PROGRESS: Rental rates were reviewed in May for July 1 , 1986 adjust- ments. Most adjustments ranged from 4.8% to 5.8%. There was an overall increase of 20. 9% in the Enterprise income this past fiscal year. The grazing lease on Russian Ridge was terminated while the property undergoes a review by a grazing consultant. Leases for the Skyline Tree Farm, High Meadow Stable, and the Adobe at Fremont Older Open Space Preserve are under review and renegotiation where appropriate. The Bullis property was acquired, requiring a search for a master tenant. 2. Carry out maintenance and improvements to rental houses to keep buildings and grounds in a safe, sanitary, and attractive condition and to increase net rental income. PROGRESS: The dead and diseased trees at the upper house on Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve were removed. The rental unit at Saratoga Gap was painted, repaired, rerented and the Saratoga Gap septic system was replaced. The deck at 13130 Skyline Boulevard on Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve was repaired and road repairs were completed at High Meadow Stable. 3. Prepare cost/benefit studies on a case by case basis as major repair (or improvement) and rental decisions arise. PROGRESS: The wastewater system at Saratoga Gap Open Space Preserve was replaced. A major decision on the renovation and reconstruction of two structures at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve was made by the Board for implementation in the 1986-1987 fiscal year. 4. Provide for interim caretaker/leasehold income for former Almaden Air Force Station at Mt. Umunhum when acquired. PROGRESS: A resident caretaker now lives on the premises and addi- tional daytime caretaking is provided on a contract basis. Meetings are being arranged with various communication companies in order to extend the current leases on a month-to-month basis in accordance with Board policy. 1986-1987 Objective The objective of the Enterprise Subprogram is to manage all the District's revenue producing activities in such a way as to maximize income from Enterprise accounts consistent with Open Space Management policies and to explore new compatible activities. R-86-61 Page nine 1986-1987 Key Projects and Activities 1. Administer all leases and rental accounts, updating rental rates and other lease conditions as opportunities arise, to maximize income consistent with Open Space Management policies. 2. Carry out maintenance and improvements to rental houses to keep buildings and grounds in a safe, sanitary, and attractive condi- tion and to increase net rental income. 3. Prepare cost/benefit studies on a case by case basis as major repair (or improvement) and rental decisions arise. R-86-61 Page ten OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Planning, Design and Development Subprogram 1985-1986 Key Projects and Activities 1. Develop, review, and coordinate the implementation of Board ap- proved Use and Management Plans in accordance with Relative Site Emphasis Policies , including commencement of planning studies for the site renovation of the Mt. Umunhum, Area of the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve , planning of public use facilities at the Pur- isima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve and Kennedy Road Area of the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve, planning of public use facil- ities at the Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve and Ken- nedy Road Area of the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. PROGRESS : Seven Use and Management Plans were reviewed by the Board during the fiscal year, and a new Relative Site Emphasis Plan and Review schedule was presented to the Board in December. Changes were made to streamline the Use and Management Plan review process . A two-phased planning process for Hassler Open Space Preserve was adopted, and initial work was started on the plan. Planning for Mt. Umunhum Area was started but, due to clean-up of materials on the site, there has been a delay in San Jose State University's initial planning input for their potential use of the site. Public use facility planning was completed for Purisima Creek Open Space Pre- serve, and implementation commenced using a State grant and other outside funding and labor support. Facility planning was continued for the Kennedy Road Area, including a public workshop, but appro- vals from the Town of Los Gatos were not yet obtained. Planning studies also continued for utilization of the structures at Rancho San Antonio. Acquisition reports, including Use and Management Plan recommendations, were prepared for the District 's 19 acquisitions considered by the Board during the year. 2. Continue the liaison efforts of multi-jurisdictional projects , spe- cifically the planning and implementation of the Bayfront Trial and the Purisima, Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve. PROGRESS : Liaison efforts continued on several multi-jurisdictional projects. Staff worked with representatives from San Mateo County, East Palo Alto, and the Coastal Conservancy on the Bayfront Trail , and District staff completed a $500 ,000 Coastal Conservancy grant application for the County. The Purisima Creek Redwoods Whole Access Trail development project involved the Trails Information and Volunteer Center (TIVC) , Whole Access , Inc. , Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST) , and the County of San Mateo as well as District staff. Other projects that have involved other jurisdictions include plan- ning phases of Mt. Umunhum, Hassler Open Space Preserve and Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve, and the Fremont Older-Stevens Creek Res- ervoir Trail development. 3 . Commence or continue implementation of the Master Plan for the Sky- line Ridge Open Space Preserve in cooperation with Peninsula Open Space Trust. PROGRESS: Work commenced on the implementation of the Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve Master Plan. A $300 ,000 State facilities imple- R-86-61 Page eleven mentation grant proposal was submitted and approved for portions of Phase I, and a planner was hired under contract to commence specific plans for access facilities at the site. POST has been actively involved with staff in developing a brochure and signing to educate the public on the master planning of the site. Biologic and interpretive facility studies were carried out on the Alpine Pond area, and staff has worked with the Skyline Historical Society on potential inclusion of a facility for their use on site. 4 . Implement the plan for staffing changes for Open Space Management as approved by the Board of Directors. PROGRESS: The initial stages of the Open Space Management staffing study were implemented, and funding for the recommended changes in the first year was approved. Staffing changes for 1986-1987 and the other years covered in the plan have yet to be approved by the Board and will be scrutinized further by the Budget Committee. 5. Update District Master Plan and include full Sphere of Influence. PROGRESS : A plan of action and timetable for implementation were completed by staff and adopted by the Board, and actual work is sched- uled, to commence in September, 1986 . 6. Complete policies for Board review and adoption and a general plan of action for Natural Resource Categorization and Management Planning of District Preserves. This will provide, with the aid of identified outside funding sources, for the preparation of site specific plans and decisions, including prescribed burning, grazing, and other agri- cultural uses , control of exotic and invasive plant species , and con- trolled dog and other recreational uses. PROGRESS : While research continued on these policies for Board con- sideration, other emergency or higher priority projects required the diversion of staff time originally intended to complete this work. 7 . Complete the formulation of trail use policies for Board approval and staff guidelines for Use and Management planning. PROGRESS: The Trail Use Policies were not completed and adopted by the Board due to the diversion of staff time to other high priority planning and research needs in this subprogram. 1986-1987 Objective The objective of the Planning, Design and Development Subprogram is to provide short term and long range acquisition planning and the formula- tion and review of Use and Management Plans , as well as overseeing the physical implementation of capital improvements for pubic access and interpretation and for resource management, master and other special plans. 1986-1987 Key Projects and Activities 1. Implement adopted Open Space Management staffing study changes. 2 . Commence or continue multi-jurisdictional planning projects for the Los Gatos Creek, Mt. Umunhum, and San Mateo County Baylands Preserves and continue joint public/private planning projects for Skyline Ridge and Hassler Preserves . R-86-61 Page twelve 3 . Develop, review, and coordinate the implementation of Board approved Use and Management Plan reviews including the implementation of pub- lic access improvements for Skyline Ridge, Purisima, Kennedy Road Area, and Hassler. 4. Complete the formulation of general District-wide trail use policies, and resource management policies for Board approval and prepare staff guidelines for their application to site specific Use and Management Plans . 5 . Complete the update of District Master Plan and include full Sphere of Influence. R-86-61 Page thirteen OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Operations , Maintenance and Volunteer Subprograms 1985-1986 Key Projects and Activities 1. Provide for security of buildings on Mt.Umunhum and complete structure demolition or renovation, under Board direction, of the buildings on Mt. Umunhum and Rancho San Antonio Open Space Pre- serves. PROGRESS : Mt. Umunhum building security was accomplished with the temporary hiring of the original caretaker, addition of a new live- in caretaker and family, and an agreement with the Santa Clara County Sheriff 's Department to provide extra patrol. District Rang- ers have also kept a high profile in the area. Renovation or demo- lition of the Mt. Umunhum buildings will not occur until completion of planning studies. An architect was hired to complete detailed plans for the renovation of the lower Rancho San Antonio house and proposed plans for division of the upper house for Board approval. 2. Implement at least one new site development project with Peninsula Open Space Trust utilizing volunteer support. Increase volunteer support by 30% by utilizing the Trails Information and Volunteer Center, the California Conservation Corps , and Peninsula Open Space Trust for site development and maintenance. PROGRESS : The Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve Whole Access Trail was completed with funding and other assistance from POST. Volunteer work played a major role in completion of this project. Volunteer support for various trail and clean-up projects has increased by over 50% this year due in major part to the Trails Information and Volunteer Center and increased District staff sup- port time. 3. Conduct a docent interpretive program, using Los Trancos Open Space Preserve, Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve, and Monte Bello Open Space Preserve, with outreach programs on other Preserves as guided by Relative Site Emphasis Policies. Continue to conduct spring wildflower walks at Edgewood. PROGRESS : Docent interpretive programs have continued on all sites mentioned, with ongoing weekly and biweekly programs at Los Trancos and Monte Bello Open Space Preserves respectively. A docent wild- flower walk was conducted at Edgewood Park, and other docent events have occurred at Long Ridge , Skyline Ridge , Rancho San Antonio, Picchetti, Windy Hill, and other Preserves . Approximately 1880 individuals were served by the docent program in the fiscal year. Docents also aided Trailbuster Days at Rancho San Antonio and helped with office activities. 4 . Evaluate success of written field policies , new field staff deploy- ment program, and field staff poisition changes and present any fur- ther proposed changes to the Board in spring, 1986 . PROGRESS : The written field policies were not completed. The field staff deployment program and position changes were included in the R-86-61 Page fourteen Open Space Management Staffing Study, studied by the Budget Commit- tee , and approved by the Board in the budget process. 5 . Conclude the Experimental Dog Program on four sites using improved methods of data collection for evaluation and decide on which sites, if any, the program should continue on a more permanent basis. PROGRESS : The Dog Program continued as an experimental program on four District sites with few problems . Data were gathered by a consulting biologist with help from staff and interested neighbors , and results will be presented to the Dog Committee and subsequently the full Board to ascertain the program's future. 1986-1987 Objective The objective of the Operations , Maintenance, and Volunteer Subprogram is to provide responsible stewardship of District lands by furnishing those public safety, maintenance, and resource protection services nec- essary for the effective management of these lands. An emphasis of this subprogram is to increase public education regarding natural features and awareness regarding proper use of these lands , as well as to maxi- mize volunteer and other support to aid in the physical implementation of capital improvements. 1986-1987 Key Projects and Activities 1. Implement changes approved in adopted Open Space Management staffing study, including new position changes , study of the site and Ranger safety issues, and increased patrol and caretaker help at more remote sites of the District. 2 . Provide for security of buildings on Mt. Umunhum and security demo- lition or renovation of buildings on other sites including all new lands and at Skyline Ridge, Rancho San Antonio, and Saratoga Gap with help from Enterprise Subprogram. 3 . Establish employee safety programs approved by Board of Directors . 4 . Increase volunteer support by at least 100% by utilizing added Dis- trict personnel, the Trail Information and Volunteer Center, court mandated work programs , and the continuation of special trail main- tenance, clean-up and other site improvement events. 5 . Explore the feasibility of establishing volunteer foot, bicycle, or equestrian trail patrol groups District wide. R-86-61 Page fifteen PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS AND GOVERNMENTAL LIAISON PROGRAM Public Participation and Education Subprogram 1985-1986 Key Projects and Activities 1. Schedule one or two special events to encourage site use and to publicize District. Possibilities include photo contest, orienteering, birding, geology day, etc . Consider also a big picnic with all the groups involved with the District. PROGRESS : This special event was shifted into the 1986-1987 fiscal year and will be at Los Gatos Creek Park. Arrangements are underway for a planning meeting with officials of Los Gatos . 2 . Based on demographic data from GRC Survey and other information, target low awareness areas for special publicity about MROSD. PROGRESS : Director Hanko gave a talk and slide show on February 10 to an East Palo Alto group and distributed publications . 3. Continue to print and distribute the Openspace newsletter and/or other District publications in line with the consensus of the Board which followed the publications workshop. PROGRESS : One issue of Openspace was produced. Plans were developed for a special Annual Report issue of Openspace which is in production. Distribution of other brochures has continued. 4 . Expand program of public presentations and displays with new materials and participants , with emphasis on noontime presentations to business and industry (if these prove successful in 1984-1985) . PROGRESS: Slide show presentations were made by staff to Menlo Park Newcomers Club; Sunnyvale Newcomers Club; Los Altos Newcomers Club; Peninsula Conservation Center; Committee for Green Foothills; Los Altos High School Community Affairs class; Rotary Club; and to employees of Beckman Instruments and Amdahl Corporations . 5. If feasible, try a pilot program of placing permanent MROSD "handout stations" in selected libraries or other public buildings in each county. PROGRESS : It was not feasible to get permanent display space. The MROSD giant display and "handout station" were set up in Los Altos, Redwood City, and Sunnyvale libraries for several weeks . 6 . Develop a "Good Neighbor" information and communication program in accordance with Board directives . PROGRESS : Special research by Communications staff has identified nearly 100 different organizations, agencies and groups with whom the District has an ongoing relationship. This information will serve as a foundation for implementing the Good Neighbor Program. Editorial and research work has begun on the Land Acquisition Policy Brochure. R-86-61 Page sixteen Public Affairs and Education Subprogram 1986-1987 Objective The objective of the Public Affairs and Education Subprogram is to generate greater public awareness , involvement, and support of the District through a continuing campaign to inform and educate the constituency about the District' s sites, program, and goals. 1986-1987 Key Projects and Activities 1. Develop new brochure to present eminent domain policy and explain the District' s land acquisition policies and procedures . Content to be approved by Board. 2 . Develop new preliminary mockup of brochure as proposed replace- ment for All-Site brochure, to assist visitors in the enjoyment and preservation of the Open Space Preserves . Describe the opportunities available to enjoy such activities, events and opportunities as photography, hiking, bicycling, picnicking, wildflower walks and wildlife observation, and other special public tours . 3. Develop a multi-phased proposal for a new format for special issue of Open Space, including a first phase involving review of concepts, reasons for change, and a cost recovery analysis . Each phase to be approved by the Board before proceeding. 4 . Develop a multi-phased proposal for a new comprehensive graphic identity and printed image program for the District, including a first phase involving review of concepts and reasons for change. Each phase to be approved by the Board before proceeding. 5 . Assist the Board in the development of a Good Neighbor information and communications program. R-86-61 Page seventeen PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS AND GOVERNMENTAL LIAISON PROGRAM Public and Private Liaison Subprogram 1985-1986 Key Projects and Activities 1. Accomplish priority items for fiscal year in District's Legislative Program utilizing services of Legislative Consultant. PROGRESS: Five of the ten A and B priority items that became bills have been signed into law. The other five are still alive with chances for being enacted excellent for two of them. The four longer-term A and B priority items are in the discussion stage and will have to be considered for the next Legislative Session. The two State ballot measures the District' s Board supported were passed by the voters . 2 . If interest continues, conduct another bus tour of District lands for public officials and key staff. PROGRESS : A bus tour was not conducted. Separate bus tours for San Mateo County and Santa Clara County officials are being planned as key projects for fiscal year 1986-1987 . 3. Hold a joint meeting with San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Commission. PROGRESS : A joint meeting with the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors was held September 18 , 1985, with Parks and Recreation Commissioners in attendance. 4 . Schedule Board members to make presentations sometime during the year to each city and county council, board and commission in their wards that wishes a presentation. PROGRESS: There was no progress on this activity due to lack of staff and Directors ' time and difficulty in coordinating schedules . 5. Send annual progress report to government officials throughout District. PROGRESS: The special Annual Report issue of the Opens2ace newsletter is in production, and will be mailed to government officials. Organizational Relations Subprogram 1986-1987 Objective The objective of the Organizational Relations Subprogram is to inform other public agencies and private organizations about the District and to secure legislation to protect the District's funding and otherwise aid in the accomplishment of the District' s goal. 1986-1987 Key Projects and Activities 1. Accomplish priority items for fiscal year in District's Legislative Program. R-86-61 Page eighteen 2. Mail special annual report issue of Open Space to public mailing list; to government officials throughout the District and in Sacramento; and to officials of other organizations, including environmental, educational, philanthropic, etc. 3 . Conduct a limited bus tour of District lands and/or a joint meeting with San Mateo County Board of Supervisors and Parks and Recreation Commission. 4 . Conduct a comprehensive bus tour of District lands and/or a joint meeting with Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors and Parks and Recreation Commission. 5. Conduct a joint site tour and opening event at Los Gatos Creek Park for Los Gatos area officials and interested members of the public. R-86-61 Page nineteen PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS AND GOVERNMENTAL LIAISON PROGRAM Media Subprogram 1985-1986 Key Projects and Activities 1. Create and maintain an up-to-date set of fact sheets on various aspects of the District' s activities for distribution to media people and others . PROGRESS : This project is underway, and updating has continued in brochures as well. Because of the constant change in infor- mation, this project is ongoing. 2. Complete production and distribution of series of public service announcements for airing on public access cable and commercial television. PROGRESS : Meetings were held with various outside professionals . A feasibility study determined that time, staff and budget requirements are beyond our present allocations . Media Relations Subprogram 1986-1987 objective The objective of the Media Relations Subprogram is to inform the public as fully as possible about the District' s purposes and activities through news stories, features , and public service announcements in the press, and on radio and television. 1986-1987 Key Projects and Activities 1. Create and maintain an up-to-date set of printed materials on various aspects of the District' s activities for distribution to the media. Update map. 2. Continue work with representatives from the Los Altos Town Crier, the Peninsula Times Tribune, the San Jose Mercury-News, the San Mateo Times, the Country Almanac, the Palo Alto Weekly, and other newspapers . R-86-61 Page twenty GENERAL MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM SUPPORT 1985-1986 Key Projects and Activities 1. Complete, at Board and staff level, all necessary planning and moving activities to ensure the District' s relocation to dif- ferent facilities by November 1, 1985, unless current deadline is extended. PROGRESS: The District opened for business at its new Old Mill Office Center location on April 28. Some move related tasks still remain, including furnishing of the Board room. 2. If marketing conditions are favorable, market a new note issue for the acquisition of land. PROGRESS: A $9. 5 million promissory note was approved for is- suance on June 13, and the note proceedings closed on July 8, 1986. 3. Provide necessary interpretation, coordination, direction, and admininstrative base, including on-going review and updating of personnel-related matters for District' s staff and programs , in order to carry out Board policies, Action Plan, and specific ac- tions according to written and unwritten Board priorities. PROGRESS: The Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual was a- dopted by the Board in January, and the Open Space Management Staffing Study was presented to you for consideration in the spring. The annual salary survey was completed as part of the 1986-1987 budget preparation process, and during Budget Commit- tee deliberations, initial data and information for the employee fringe benefit study was presented. This latter project is slated for presentation to the Board during the fall. 4 . Continue to promote an atmosphere conducive to generating a crea- tive item team effort, including at least one staff workshop re- treat. PROGRESS: A workshop retreat focusing on the Communications Pro- gram was held in December by the program leaders. Usual efforts during the year continued on generating a creative team effort. The entire office staff pitched in to make the move to the Old Mill Office Center as smooth as possible. 5. Complete implementation of microcomputer system. PROGRESS: The selection and purchase of a computer system were not compl—eted. 1986-1987 Objective The objective of the General Management and Program Support is to pro- vide overall coordination, direction and administrative base for all District activities so as to maximize the accomplishment of the Board' s policies and directives. 1986-1987 Key Projects and Activities 1. Provide required functions for the election of District Directors in Wards 1 , 2 , 5 and 6, and familiarize any new Directors with the R-86-61 Page twenty-one District' s activities. 2. If marketing conditions are favorable, market a new note issue for the acquisition of land. 3. Provide necessary interpretation, coordination, direction and ad- ministrative base, including on-going review and updating of per- sonnel-related matters for District's staff and programs, in or- der to carry out Board policies, Action Plan, and specific actions according to written and unwritten Board priorities. 4. Continue to promote and enhance an atmosphere conducive to gener- ating a creative team effort, including one small and one large staff workshop retreat. 5. Complete implementation of microcomputer system. R-86-65 (Meeting 86-19 August 13, 1986) iKC MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT August 5 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; D. Woods, Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Authorization to Solicit Bids for Public Access Improvements to Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve Recommendation: I recommend that you authorize staff to advertise forbids for the construction (improvement) of two parking areas to be located at the Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve and to be constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be presented. Background: At your meeting of August 14 , 1985 you approved the Use and Management Plan for Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve in which various public access improvements were proposed (see memorandum M-85-117 of August 6 , 1986) . Prior to this, in July 1985 , the State awarded the District a $150 ,000 grant for the development of such improvements which were later included in the plan. A major component of the plan includes the improvement of three parking areas , two of which are along Skyline Boulevard and one off Higgins- Purisima Road near Half Moon Bay (see attached map) . At your meeting of January 8 , 1986 , you approved the award of a contract to Ortha Zebroski, Landscape Architect, for the preparation of plans and specifications for the three parking areas (see report R-86-03 of January 2 , 1986) . These have subsequently been completed and submitted to the California State Transportation Agency and the County of San Mateo for their approval. During the staff review of the project by the County, an issue arose re- lating to the parking area plans at Higgins-Purisima Road. Because this area lies within the California Coastal Zone, development of this nature is strictly regulated and could require a lengthy review process. One of the conditions making the project difficult is a 50 foot setback requirement for any project within the creek corridor. The steep terrain in the immediate vicinity of the project area would then dictate the necessity of a variance and probably an Environmental Impact (EIRY , which could extend the timeline another year. On the other hand, the coastal zone regulations do not restrict fencing, gating, and signing. Staff will be able to proceed with those types of improvements to control better the existing parking and illegal use prob- lems and to make the site more attractive and publicly visible. These improvements will provide essentially the same or slightly more parking space than now exists with the benefit that the parking area will be lo- cated inside the roadside gate and fence which will be secured at night. Steps will be taken not to impact the creek area under this plan. Curious- ly, the regulations allow construction of a road in the 50 foot creek set- R-86-65 Page 2 back but not a parking area. Postponing the grading portion of the Higgins-Purisima parking area, which will presumably occur at a later date, will allow staff to then concentrate on the improvements along Skyline. These improvements can proceed immedi- ately upon approval by the San Mateo County Planning Commission and CalTrans , which is expeced to occur within the next four weeks . Separating the im- provement of these two Skyline areas from the third lower area should not substantially affect cost of the overall project. Because of the geograph- ical difference in the two project areas , the upper and lower parking areas would probably not have been constructed simultaneously or with the same suppliers of materials and equipment even if there had been only one contrac- tor involved. The estimated cost of construction of the two Skyline parking areas is $50 ,000 . The detailed plans and specifications will be available for your review at the August 13 meeting. In summary, the plans propose an expansion of the north ridge parking area to include parking for horse trailers and an expan- sion of the CalTrans parking area at upper Purisima Road to include parking for the physically limited. Compliance with CEQA: The 1985 Use and Management Plan for Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve contained the following statements regarding California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . "In October 1984 the Board approved the application for Grant Funds under the Regional Competitive Pro- gram of the California Recreational Facilities Act (1984) . At that time, staff determined the project was categorically exempt. Since there are no significant changes in the project, as outlined in this Use and Management Plan, a categorical exemption is appropriate. Staff, though, recognizes that specific plans for the construction of parking areas may require fur- ther consideration under CEQA Guidelines and would return to the Board for review of site specific plans and CEQA documents if necessary. " The categor- ical exemption is attached to this report (see exhibit A) . San Mateo County staff has concurred with District staff 's opinion that CEQA procedures have been sufficiently executed for the improvement of the Skyline parking areas. They have, though, indicated that further consideration should be given to design and CEQA for the Higgins-Purisima Road area. This could entail redesign to comply with the setback regulations, applying for a variance if there are no alternatives , and contracting with the County for completion of CEQA, which may include preparation of an EIR to address miti- gation. For these reasons , we are recommending proceeding with construction of the Skyline parking areas and minor (first phase) development of the Higgins- Purisima Road parking area. Staff will continue to work with San Mateo County on grading plans for the lower area following completion of the re- maining public access improvements contained in the Use and Management Plan. a$� Exhibit A .a ENDORSED t �� t:r 1!iE CFFICE CF THE (' D c�JU"ViY CLERK OF 'M MATEO COUN&Y G4y1F. N HIDPENISULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE D?-STR 8�j OCT 2919 AgWft IIV GHURCH, County Clerk ITotice of Exem Lion By TSY Ar�I Ktt t�=� DEPUTY CLERK P_oject ^=tle Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve Public Access Project PrO jeCt Location Purisima Creek Vatershed - berwe6n S;rt irte Baul evardd Tuunita„y Creek Roa3 and Higgins Purisima Road in unincorporated San Mateo County - Desc-iPt=on of project Development of an existing Open space preserve to Im- prove accessibility and recreational opportunities_ Constriction consists of 3 un- paved narking areas with a total capacity of 6S-75 cars, avpro:cizzately 2' miles of new trail and clearing 31j miles of existing trail, installation of •foot bridges and small restrooms. Exempt Status: (check one) •Ministerial -(Section .15073) Emergen.c Project X Categorical Exemption (State type and section number) : Section 15304, Class 4, Minor Alterations to land; 15311, Class 11, Accessory *, 15303 C 3 New Construction of small structure. Reasons why project is exempt Proposes light construction which will not have significant environmental impact: (I) parking lots will be unpaved and located so as to have minimal visual impacts; (2) trails will be ali,ed at- a 10% maximum grade; and (3) restrooms will be small structures and Trost likely self-contained units_ Date of Finding Staff Person Making Determination 20/17/84 01 »rnc.�-� C� Alice Cummings �— Environmental Analyst wx it TO J LOCATION MAP j HIdY �2 }dM 1945,L I PURISIMA CREEK REDWOODS OPEN SPACE PRESERVE , s•■No■ Existing hiking/equestrian trails 35 \ '� `�,'<`• PARKING AREA 1: EXISTING 10 CAR ; ; ✓��o ' j \~ \\ PARKING AREA TO BE EXPANDED TO '. <� _- �■.�.. Hiking/equestrian trails to be cleared I (ACCOMODATE 10 ADDITIONAL VEHICLES < 1� I W s N 9 Hiking/equestrian trails to be constructed WITH HORSE TRAILERS. , SCALE 1" = 2000' NORTH BM 4 /J/. JJ rJ J 1) •'' \ `J `. 1\1 \ ` �_ ', NOpV\ �f���/ /LLV�i \`•.� % i/�� ��!,''oo ptiy / }f - _ ` _ n \ �i. _,mil _\ .\✓f -�i� Gu _� �� ,�� F 'i/�f lJi-'s~\ t •'( SKYLINE B , / I�_ SEA- .TIC 'A f TRAIL 09, 51( . _ :ems -y-'� _y, ��{, .,' � ' � ; �•''\ ; �� �,. �..� - \ X143lima - 1 \, ,11(` o >HIG�S-P Is I�Q, �\ '�� �, WWI � / � t ��\s�, ��, • � '�� c HUDDART COUNTY PARK r PARKING AREA 3: AREA TO \. BE DELINEATED WITH FENCINGGO ` \_AND GATED. _� 1 \? I \ `_ Rv PARKING AREA 2: EXISTING CAL TRANS PULLOUT TO BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE \ �) 3 HANDICAPPED SPACES f' �4 sw> Belmont t <- \ \ —7 i✓ `�: Res axs,stun nA. rut L' Ob� �, / \J' ` ( `\' - �:T �� �•J� '% �`.'J m l_��t..r;`4, `NDRe � \ (� y� . z � -'•San Carlos � ,w \ TUNITAS CREEK ROAD GAVE �E t�� 1 • n Bay AEFUOf r OPRFSO+ 4 o \� L'.. s,, _ tel _• 4Ka' , 8t I�If� /I(`lil - ' MenloP ` :� r` � +I M" 4 - CALIF. RIDING &`�- s HIKING TRAIL MIN Wo dside s l�ll�ctr 1 )))! -�� - � ��\\���— \ i� _L` j�' � 1\.1\\�..._ ^=ti,�, •} ram\ C \ �n o0r1 •'/,='/1 ./�:�-` � �►�Y��/���•,` — _ ,.__._ —---— ——————————7 R"86,60 (Meeting 86,,.19 August 13, 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT July 28 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: Co-Sponsorship of Regional Conference: "The Greenbelt' s Public Lands: The Next Twenty Years" Introduction; Attached is information on a regional conference to be Yield September 27th by People for Open Space (POS) . I have been con- sulted by POS as they have planned the conference, plan to attend, and may be a panelist. Co-sponsorship and, if possible, a financial contribution are requested of the District. Discussion: The District has co-sponsored such conferences before, and, given the nature of this conference and the purposes of the POS organi- zation, could well co-sponsor this conference. According to my memory, the District has never made a financial contri- bution (other than registration fees) for such a conference. (The Dis- trict did make contributions for some Special Districts' Forum and Not- So-Annual Regional Park and Open Space District conferences, but we were also conference hosts in that case. ) To make even a nominal contribution to this worthwhile conference could make it difficult to turn down future requests for not quite so worthwhile events. The benefit to the District, however, would not be difficult to justify in this case. Recommendation: I recommend that the District be a co-sponsor of the POS Regional Conference: "The Greeenbelt' s Public Lands : The Next Twenty Years. " I reluctantly recommend that the District not make a financial contribu- tion, since the District is not directly involved as a cohost. p Peo le for Open S ace t241986 p 512 Second Street a San Francisco, CA 94407 a (415) 543-4291 CK ` July 2 , 1986 Dear Friend of the Bay Area Greenbelt, People for Open Space will hold a regionwide conference, "The Greenbelt's Public Lands: The Next Twenty Years," on Saturday, Sept. 27, at the beautiful new Clark Kerr Conference Center in Berkeley. We would like to know if your organization is interested in being a co--sponsor. The conference will be a major focal point for the many constituencies that use or rely on the public lands in the Bay Area's Greenbelt -- the half- million acres of open lands owned by public agencies and private non-profits and devoted to recreation, watershed, environmental education, flood control, viewshed, wildlife habitat, grazing, or other uses. It is clear to us that there is ample justification for expanding these public lands in the coming years. We hope to bring together those knowledgeable about and committed to these lands, in order to create a vision for their expansion and ensure a broader, more effective constituency for the work ahead. Enclosed is a tentative agenda for the conference. We are also preparing a report on the region's public lands that will identify current and future needs, and an inventory of publicly-owned open lands in the region. The conference will also feature the premiere showing of a new film, "Treasures of the Greenbelt." Co-sponsorship involves the following: * Listing of your organization's name on the program at the conference and in conference publicity. * Ensuring that at least one representative of the organization attends. (continued) BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADVISORY COMMITTEE President Robert Mang' Contra Costa County Son Mateo County Howard Allen McMn B.Lane EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Vice Presidents Paul De Falco Clarence E.Heller Leslie S.Ayers Putnam Livermore Larry Orman Barbara Eastman' Morin County Lennie Roberts' Joseph Bodovitz Pamela Lloyd William D.Evers' Lawrence Livingston,Jr.' Joel W.Schreck Lewis H.Butler Irwin Luckman Michael Marston' Bonnie Mitsui Santa Clara County Laurence Dawson Dr.Bradford Lundborg ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR Clement Shute' George A Sears Nancy Alexander Patricia K.DiGiorgio Sylvia McLaughlin Judith Kunofsky Rene di Rosa Theodore Osmundson Secretary-heasurer Napa County Solana County Joseph H.Engbeck Jr. Neal R.Peirce James D.Hobbs' Volker Eisele' Bob Berman Mortimer Fleishhacker III Mel Scott Son Francisco Elizabeth R.Patterson' Eileen R.Growald Mrs.William Siri founder.' Kameda County George Ballou Sonoma County Alfred Heller Wallace Stegner Dorothy Erskine �' Mary Jane Brinton George Ellman I.Michael Heyman Mrs.Carl W Stern (1896-1982) Mary Jefferds Dr.John Erskine D,William Krum Lois Crozier Hogle John H.Sutter Marguerite K Johnston Chuck Forester Joseph C.Houghteling Mrs,Otto H.Teller T.J.Kent Jr.' Allan B.Jacobs' `Executive Committee Huey Johnson John Tuteur Bud Johns Member Robert Kirkwood Mrs.Robert Watson Gerrie Kretzmer Mrs.Edgar Wayburn Page 2 * Publicizing the conference in your upcoming publications. (Enclosed is a sample announcement.) * Providing us advice on potential speakers. * Sending invitations to your Board and, if possible, to your members. * If possible, making sane financial contribution to support the conference. By becoming a co-sponsor, you will gain more visibility among a regionwide audience, have a chance to help shape the conference's program, and have the opportunity to add your organization's goals to a regionwide vision for the public portion of the Greenbelt. I am sure you will agree with me that maintenance of a high quality of life in the San Francisco Bay Area is dependent on expansion of the Greenbelt's public lands. Please call Wendy Pulling of our staff, or me, to let us know if there are special procedures to be following in gaining your sponsorship. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, jJith ofsky tor. tor, Greenbelt 'Action Program P.S. Of course, we would appreciate your attendance, publicity among your members and leaders, and advice on the conference program, even if you choose not to formally co-sponsor. THE GREENBELT'S PUBLIC LANDS: THE NEXT 20 YEARS September 27, 1986 Clark Kerr Conference Center, Berkeley DRAFT AGENDA (7/18 draft) 9:00 POS Annual Meeting - staff and president's report, R & A 9:45 Keynote speaker 10:45 PLENARY: THE NEED AND THE VISION past, present, and future of the Greenbelt's public lands i 12:15 Break 12:30 Buffet lunch 1:15 WORKSHOPS: MEETING THE CHALLENGES TO MAKING THE VISION REALITY (1) Making the Case: Marshalling Public Support involving new constituencies building political support (2) Making the Case: the economic benefits of expanded e public lands to individual ccmmunities near the public lands to the region as a guarantor of quality of life, and therefore the economy (3) Securing the Land -- Ways and Means current techniques, possibilities for the future (purchase, dedication, easements, etc.) (4) Protecting the Greenbelt's Public Lands: Management Issues increasing public access consumptive vs. recreational uses developed vs. undeveloped recreation threats to current public open lands 3:00 Break 3:15 Premiere showing of new film, "Treasures of the Greenbelt" 3:45 PLENARY: CALL TO ACTION developing a citizen's regional master plan for new acquisitions securing the land and the role of citizen advocacy 4:15 Wine Tasting and Reception 5:00 End d SAMPLk. ISLETTER. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CONFE M (NOTE: As of 7/21, we have not yet confirmed the keynote speaker. Please call Judy Kunofsky at POS for up-to-date information before you print a conference announcement. Feel free to edit this announcement!) YOU ARE INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN A REGIONWIDE CONFERENCE on THE GREENBELT'S PUBLIC LANDS: THE NEXT TWENTY YEARS The Bay Area Greenbelt's public lands consist of the half-million acres of parks, trails, watersheds, and other publicly owned open lands in the region. The Greenbelt also includes 3 1/2 million acres of privately owned farms, ranches, and other lands. As the region's population increases by a million over the next 20 years, and pushes outward in newly-urbanizing communities, there is a substantial need for more public open lands, and protection of the Greenbelt lands currently in public ownership. This conference is an opportunity for exchange of goals, expertise, and experiences for those from all nine counties committed to the Greenbelt's public lands. Participants will create a vision for lands to be acquired over I� P� � the next 20 years, and ensure a broader, more effective constituency for the work ahead. Those encouraged to attend include land managers, conservationists, environmental educators, trail advocates and other recreation enthusiasts, biologists, public officials, and others. The conference is being organized by People for Open Space, and co-sponsored by the Greenbelt Congress (add your organization's name here, if appropriate). Features: Ke note Speaker: (please call POS before printing this for confirmittion of speaker) Wor1Ssho2s on the economic benefits to the region of its public lands, marshalling public support, securing more public open space for the Greenbelt, and protecting these areas, through sound management. Premiere showing of a new films, "Treasures of the Greenbelt" Developing a Vision: a chance for participants to articulate their goals for new lands to be secured. When and Where: Saturday, September 27, at the beautiful new Clark Kerr Conference Center on the U.C. Berkeley campus, 9:00am - 5:00pm. Cost: $18.00, including lunch, wine reception, film screening, final report of conference proceedings, and summary of new inventory of the region's publicly armed open lands. '! Registration is limited. A limited number of full or partial scholarships isiavailable. To register, or for more information: contact People for Open Space, 512 Second Street, San Francisco 94107, or call (415) 543-4291. j PUT US ONE YOUR CALENDAR! 02,! ALENDAR! 02,!` '' hI III i A Bay Areawide Conference ' Sponsored by People for Open Space THE GREENBELT'S PUBLIC LANDS. -- THE NEXT 20 YEARS Saturday, September 27" -- UC Berkeley Conf. Center A chance to share your vision for the future of the public lands of the nine county Greenbelt its parks, trails, watersheds and other public lands h Plus the premiere of the new 27-minute documentary film, "Treasures of the Greenbelt" For more information, contact Judy Kunofsky at POS: 512 Second Street, San Francisco CA 94107 (415)543-4291 M-86-72 (Meeting 86-19 August 13, 1986) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM August 13, 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager PREPARED BY: J. Fiddes , District Clerk SUBJECT: November Election The following individuals have been certified to appear on the November ballot: Santa Clara County Ward 1 Katherine (Kay) Duffy Ward 2 Daniel G. Wendin Mark Winitz Alfonso R. Tatano Ward 5 Nonette Hanko San Mateo County Ward 5 Nonette Hanko Ward 6 Gerry B. Andeen Dr. Nancy Jewell Cross M-86-71 (Meeting 86-19 Aff August 13 , 1986) NOS= MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM August 1, 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: M. Foster, Controller SUBJECT: Five Year Cash Flow Projection During the budget cycle, you expressed a desire to receive, on a regular basis, a 3 - 5 year cash flow projection. Attached is my proposed format for this report. If acceptable, this projection will be updated and presented each quarter as an informational re- port. Each column represents the cash inflows and outflows expected in one of the next five years. The figures at the top of the column are sources of cash and the bracketed figures are uses of cash. At the bottom of each column is a recap of the projected land acquisition expenditures including a listing of major projects completed or pending approval. Based on the assumptions and restrictions listed below, the District will have resources to purchase $32 .5 million of land during the next five years. Assumptions 1. Basic tax revenue: based on 8. 5%/year increases. 2. Interest income: based on 7% rate in 86-88, 7. 5% thereafter. 3. Other income: based on 3%/year increases. 4. Bond issues: same terms as 1986 notes. 5. New land contracts: 10 year life at 7% interest (Hosking 8%) . 6. Operating expenses: 15%/year increase for land management; 8% for other programs. 7 . Development: Per 3-year plan plus 10%/year increases thereafter. Restrictions 1. Year-end cash balances meet reserve requirements of outstanding bonds. 2. Unsubordinated debt service is within the limits set by covenants in our outstanding bonds. 3. Total debt outstanding is within the limit set by statute (4-year tax revenue) . 4. The June 1991 cash balance is sufficient to meet 1991-92 operating expenses, debt service, and June 1992 reserve requirements without new bonds. f July 31, 1986 MROSD CASH FLOW PROJECTION 1986-87 THROUGH 1990-91 ($ THOUSANDS) 86-87 87-88 88-89 89-90 90-91 Beginning Cash 5725 9141 5203 9550 7370 Tax Revenue Basic 6439 6986 7580 8224 8924 Pre-Prop. 13 670 640 Receipts from Grants 467 400 300 300 300 Interest Income 800 550 525 600 550 Rental and Other Income 343 353 364 375 386 Bond Issues (Net) 9291 7800 7800 Debt Service - Old (5277) (5411) (4530) (4069) (3825) Debt Service - New (249) (857) (1861) (3081) Land Management (1284) (1477) (1698) (1953) (2246) Development (673) (472) (293) (322) (355) Acquisition Expenses (443) (478) (502) (524) (546) Gen. Mgmt./Comm. (722) (780) (842) (910) (982) Total Expenses/Development (3122) (3207) (3335) (3709) (4129) Land Purchases For Cash (6195) (4000) (3500) (2040) (5500) For Notes Issued(*) (1805) (2000)• (1000) (5460� (1000) Total Purchases (8000) (6000) (4500 (7500) (6500) Land Contracts Issued (*) 1805 2000 1000 5460 1000 Ending Cash 9141 5203 9550 7370 8795 Less: Required Reserves 4041 4173 5627 5605 7078 District Reserve Balance 5100 1030 3923 1765 1717 Land Acquisition Recap Dyer 2500 Hosking Option 300 350 400 5425 Other 5200 5650 4100 2075 6500 Total Purchased 8000 6000 4500 7500 6500 Cumulative Purchases 8000 14000 18500 26000 32500 (*)Off-setting non-cash items included to show land purchased in exchange for MROSD land contract notes. I I M-86-70 (Meeting 86-19 AA. MPL August 13, 1986) 'WL 'elif 20=is Lk MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM July 31, 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: District Presentation to San Mateo County Planning Commission Attached is correspondence dated July 21 from the San Mateo County Planning Commission. District staff has been invited to make a presentation and answer questions. It would be helpful if at least one of our Board members attended. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE July 21 , 1986 S & Y also clarified the proposed underwriting fees and expenses . Their refined estimate is 2. 25% of the amount to be issued. This compares to fees of 2. 522% and 2. 508% earned on the 1982 and 1985 notes. If you approve distribution of the POS on May 28, 1986, S & Y plans to obtain all quotations and information needed to price the 1986 Notes by June 10 , 1986 . Given the terms are favorable, I will present resolutions of issuance and a note purchase agreement at your June 11, 1986 Board meeting. If the Board decides to go ahead with the note issue on June 11, then the Board must also adopt a resolution approv- ing an agreement with a note paying agent. Recommendation : I recommend that you approve and authorize distribu- tion of the Preliminary Official Statement covering the issuance of the 1986 Promissory Notes. N" Z 3 ' / lf" KM 0 311 M-86-69 V (Meeting 86-19 August 13 , 1986) +� r MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM July 30 , 1986 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: Update on District' s Legislative Program Attached fo r or our information y n mation is an update on the District' s � Legislative Program. I I i I i AdOpLed by Board )l Uij-ccLors August 28 , 1985 Amended October 23, 1985 an6 May 14 , 1986 Updated July '30 , 1986 .1 REVISED LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM FOR 1985-86 SESSION Item Bill Prime Lead Support/Oppose/ No. No. Sponsor Author No Position Priority summary Status 1 AB 13 Roos S A Protection of District' s current. Signed by Governor share of property tax 2 MROSD S A Funding for proposed Bear Creek Red- Property not y I et woods State Park if property becomes available available at reasonable cost 3 MROSD S A Funding for trail corridor con- Exploratory dis- nections, in fee. or easements , cussions on poten- from MROSD lands to State parks tial legislation 4a AB 2253 MROSD Sher S B Clarification and strengthening of dedication rules to assure that trail and open space easements can be protected by dedication P.R.C. 5540 4b AB 2253 MROSD Sher S B Modernization of repayment schedule Signed by Governor for district debt and sales require- ments to allow, for example, equal payments of principal plus interest rather than just principal - P .R.C. 5544 . 1 and 5544 . 2 5a SB1685 MROSD Bergeson S B Housekeeping change to P.R.C. 5552 to add check signatory authorization by resolution Passed Senate On Assembly floor 5b SB 1685 MROSD Bergeson S B Would add P.R.0 -Sec. 5539 .5 to allow District' s Board of Directors to use provisions of 1911, 1913 and 1915 improvements acts 5c MROSD S B Would amend P.R.C. to allow Proposed addition District to refund and refinance to Legislative notes and more readily utilize Program ; reviewing need- short term financing not included in SB 1683 as planned , 7 12 2/86 Item Bill Prime Lead Support/Oppose/ Priority Summary Status No. No . Sponsor Author No Position 6 - MROSD - - - Modification of Brown Act to Referred to Legis- allow Closed Session discussions lative Committee; of properties within master plan further direction planning area, possibly without to Committee ex- a list or parcel-specific notice pected from Board 7 - MROSD - S B Require a redevelopment agency, Proposed addition when it shares a portion of the to Legislative tax increment with one entity Program; no bill this levying taxes within the re- Session development area, to share with other entities levying taxes within the redevelopment area w an equal percentage of taxes that would have been lost by each entity Sa SB 360 EBRPD Lockyer S B Housekeeping changes to bring rules regarding filling of board vacancies into conformity with Elections Code-P.R.C. 5536 (c) Signed by Governor 8b SB 360 EBRPD Lockyer NP - Allowance of up to $100 compen- sation for board member atten- dance at committee meetings and field trips, but maintaining $100 daily and $500 monthly maximum for all meetings--P.R.C. 5536 (b) . 9 AB 1563 EBRPD Bates NP Coming audit publication date Language deleted from from no`t-`2atr..than 90 to not bill. later than 120 days fifer end of fiscal year - P .R.C. 555 10 AB 355 EBRPD Klehs S C Housekeeping changes regarding Died in Committee disposition of district records- P.R.C. 5557 . 1 7 I t el"I I I pri 'lle 1,Q'i d Support/Opposo/ PrioriLy Sullallary S La 11S N No . Au i or NO posit.ioli 11 AB 601 EBRPD R. Campbell NP Allowance of up to $100 compen- Signed by Governor; cation for board meniber a[:t-.(-,2n- contains urgency dance at committee meetings and -- clause field trips, but maintaining $100 daily and $500 monthly maximum for all meetings P.R.C. 5536 (b) 12 SB 805 Presley S B Wildlife and Natural Areas Con- On Assembly eloor; Urgency servation Act of 1986 to author- clause refused adoption ize $85,000, 000 State bond issue for use by Wildlife Conservation Board 13 (SB 806) (Presley) S (A) Community Parklands Act of 1986 Signed by Governor; to authorize $100 , 000, 000 State Proposition 43 ; passed bond issue for local acquisition and development grants 14 SB 1717 PCL Maddy S A California Agricultural, Natural Passed Senate; in Assembly and Park Lands Conservation Act Ways and Means ; size now to authorize a $500 ,000 ,000 State $155 ,000, 000. bond measure 15 AB 4413 Coastal Killea S B California Shore , Beach, and Passed Assembly; On Senate Conservancy Stream Restoration Facilities floor Bond Act of 1986 161 AB 2198 Schools Felando 0 C Severe limitation of application Died in Committee of Naylor bill requiring offer of some below-market sale of surplus school property to public agencies 17 AB 1456 Fairs Clute 0 C Make citrus fruit fairs eligible Signed by Governor for 1984 Park and Recreation Bond Act funds Californians 18 AB 2020 Margolin S C Require deposit on beverage To Conference Committee Against Waste bottles 19 Prop. 43 Taxpayers for Fair S Fair Responsibility Act of 1986 ; June State ballot Responsibility "Deep Pocket" Initiative initiative measure; Prop. 51 ; passed RESPONSE ACTION PROPOSED BY STAFF Board President Acknowledge/respond WRITTEN COMMUNICATION ting 86-19 Director Acknowledge/Respond Meeting I3, 6-19 �( Staff Acknowledge/Respond 1986 Draft Response Attached Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft Response for Board Consideration per Board Directive(s) Other AA- 4t, p,,4 ,L tit o4-� �q4-�. . DAVID C. FORK 30 SUMMIT RD. WOODSIDE, CA 94062 1 JMIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: F.Y.I. DATE: August 8, 1986 r In the public eye about anything, which is why the Van de The mere possibility of a Kamp interpretation is inimical to open government. (What proposed ordinance, lawsuit is not enough to regulation or permit revocation isn't a potential lawsuit magnet these days?) hold a closed meeting Fortunately, Senate President Pro- Tempore David Roberti, D-Los Angeles, has responded with legislation that spells N California, government belongs to out — and limits — the lawyer-client the people. Except in a few, limited exception to both the Ralph M. Brown circumstances, city councils, county Act, which covers local governments, and boards of supervisors and state agencies the Bagley-Keene Act, which applies to must conduct the public's business in pub- state agencies. ,Robert's Senate Bill 2173 will be heard lic. But a recent informal opinion by Attor- next Wednesday by the Assembly Ways and Means Committee, which should ney General John Van de Kamp threatens approve it promptly. to shred the state's open-meeting y The measure sanctions closed meetings stretching the interpretation of lawyer- when a government agency is actually client privilege beyond recognition. being sued, when it is being threatened The state's chief lawyer suggests that with a suit or when it is thinking about state and local agencies should be able to suing somebody. "Apart from (these) lim- meet secretly with their attorneys to dis- ited circumstances,"says SB 2173, ". . . no cuss any issue or any proposal that might closed session is authorized by the attor- somedap lead to a lawsuit. ney-client privilege." In today's litigious society, that's just That's reasonable. �4 t Al PQ ',4..,'�\'1 t• 6 ��..� ^,fit r r {' r •7 - f .l.a{.4 tt.••� t .i_•.f�l .S•; t• 1 �'4 X�Ta}Q i• ?,t � ,4 fp d w• 1 1. , Sro �-. - y�4o��aa,.,,: ;,:ter � ��y > �,�,. "• ��,. Ak Y. � � ' 1'�����4�;. 1l4q+�i�t'R ��F'�,y�1,r*�F `'y`It�.t'� i +r • r` �. ,� t ^«;��'�'�;tY"t�l ip,R•�,� A v. RYfft'Y•1�,y,ot-L-Ww.";rwA .,�i•.... .. 1,�•a 1-.qr.�{�:0. �: t f , a��"�.�' ` Y'> x' �•�'.�ait�r' ��� '� �a'2 4.d 4' �. r"y�}•" `4',t�er �1�'c• � a �•>>7';4`� '�� "�i.• r -"" rrs�� ,✓ -• 'RY' cCm. i 4Lk, a y, aY• ,Si..>}+Sr�i1} .. ,. �r..V :'�� '1.°.i'�»�r► t..�°�"•�►"'�':t i,, �Y �r �•t ti ••�••-� •' i ,�'� a�`�'4 l t .�s,�i,. + t s�� �1.'� � �tq'`�`��(. `1 .� ! �-. s t.: . t :.r'•. .� ' f\e 1 .• tiL�� T �"2 � i �r' �' .r 'k 7 �WV'. '1t��i 1 � '1I Q �• 1 ; r j ti..� r a � Lf. � 4 ,r.4'ty •F+t I �} '4r• �i' a" r, s •t ''1. iv'.__: •cY''A'I�ii• ! �. t00.y r.A.f7� .! • 1 _ - _ �•1 _ Y -.. Y t' is d t ''�i ,;Arm•r+- i.. .!'ti Parks � x Winter Rain in Redwood Grove Outdoor enthusiasts in Los Altos barbecue pits. All are open to the Los Altos Hills. have a wide selection of facilities public from dawn to dusk 365 days In the years since, Hidden Villa's from which to choose for recreation. a year. working farm and wilderness have Choices conveniently available The most developed preserves been shared with thousands of nearby range from well-groomed have gravel parking lots, rest- visitors who have enjoyed the oak- Los Altos city parks with tennis rooms, well marked trail systems studded grasslands, chaparral hill- courts, picnic facilities and and detailed site brochures. Dogs sides and Adobe Creek woodland playgrounds to beautiful, are generally not permitted. watershed. The Duvenecks, now undeveloped wilderness areas for Maps and brochures are avail- deceased, gave 430 acres—the the enjoyment of hikers and able at the MROSD office, 375 Windmill Pasture area—to Mid- equestrians. Distel Circle, Suite D-1, Los Altos. peninsula Regional Open Space Los Altos Recreation Department The phone number is 965-4717. District in 1977. operates Hillview Community The first hostel in the West, Center, 97 Hillview Ave., and six A close relationship with nature established at Hidden Villa in 1937, parkes offering attractions to is also available at Hidden Villa, is still available for groups and appeal to all ages, from toddlers 26870 Moody Road, Los Altos individual hikers. For information on up. Hills, where many miles of call 941-6407. An interracial camp The Midpeninsula Regional Open wilderness trails have long for children has been held at Space District, a tax-supported attracted individual hikers and Hidden Villa every summer since public agency, has acquired 17,470 such groups as the Sierra Club, 1945. acres of scenic and recreational Audubon Society and Nature Santa Clara County maintains a land in the foothills and baylands Exploration. variety of parks and other of Santa Clara and San Mateo Visitors, always welcome, are recreation areas with facilities for counties for the use and enjoyment asked to park and sign in at the boaters, fishermen, hikers, of the public—and for the preserva- parking field. Horseback riding is picnickers, horseback riders, tion of the natural environment. limited to specific trails and dry motorcyclists and campers. Phone Close-to-home recreational weather. Call the ranch manager, number for the county's Parks and possibilities in the preserves 941-7983, for more information. Recreation Department is (408) include meadows as picnic sites, In the 1920s Frank and Jose- 779-3741. hills for kite flying and wooded phine Duveneck bought Hidden Groves of redwood trees are trails for exploring. None of the Villa's original 1,OOO'acres (later among the primary characteristics preserves are developed parks with doubled) located in the foothills of of state parks located within easy such amenities as ball fields and the Santa Cruz Mountains behind driving distance of Los Altos. 19 idpensinsula Regional ®pea Space District Midpeninsula Regional equestrian trails. Special attractions t Open Space District are Seven Spring Canyon, abundant - 201 San Antonio Circle with wildlife, and Hunters Point. Call j Mt.View . . . . . . . . . . . . 949-5500 district office for information on Brochures and maps of the pre- areas where dogs on leashes are r, serves are available at the district of. permitted. Limited parking available fice. Call for information on docent- at the end of Prospect Road, 1.5 led hikes (free) on the Earthquake miles from intersection with Stelling Trail at Los Trancos, the Stevens Road. Additional parking at Stevens Creek Nature Trail at Monte Bello, Creek County Park. } on trails at San Antonio and other Hassler preserves. Former site of a tuberculosis Wild Mustard Coal Creek sanitarium, the preserve at 1-280 Lccated southwest of Portola Valley and Edgewood Road in San Carlos between Alpine Road and Skyline is closed to the public until restor- at 10 a.m. the third Saturday of Boulevard. this 338-acre preserve ation is complete. each month. Bring a lunch and g. ofers rolling meadows of open Long Ridge water. grassland, large madrones, a pic- Located on the western slopes of Morita Bello Picchetti turesque barn and forested head- ,Skyline Ridge, the reserve provides Ranch Area waters of two creeks. Obtain site y g p spectacular views of Big Basin State Focal point is the Picchetti Ranch, a map showing access and trails. Park, Butano Ridge and Devil's Can- picturesque turn-of-the-century El Sereno yon. There are 3.5 miles of trails, winery and farm complex. Parking Named for the 2500-foot Mt. including one that connects with area access is from Monte Bello Sereno south of Saratoga and Los Skyline County Park and Saratoga Road, one-half mile west of Stevens Gatos, this 1,036-acre preserve is Gap. Obtain map for parking and Creek Road intersection. Brochures primarily a chaparral community site information. at site. with a 3-mile ridge trail offering Los Trancos Purissima Creek Redwoods hikers and equestrians spectacular Adjoining Monte Bello Open Space Located on the western slopes of panoramic views of Lexington Reser- Preserve and Palo Alto's Foothills Santa Cruz Mountains overlooking voir.. Lydon Canyon and the South Park, this 274-acre preserve is an Half Moon Bay, the preserve has 10 Bay. Obtain site map. ideal location for picnics, hikes, miles of trails through redwoods, Foothills horseback riding or enjoying the ferns, berries and wildflowers, as Located in the Adobe Creek water- views of the valley below. Included well as a hardwood forest. Area has shed above Hidden Villa Ranch and in the 5 miles of trails, which loop a rich history of logging. Parking adjacent to Palo Alto's Foothills through the shady headwaters of area located 6.5 miles south of Park, Foothills' 181 acres feature a Los Trancos Creek, is the popular Highway 92. Obtain a site map. grassy ridgetop offering a fine view 1.5-mile San Andreas Fault Trail, a Rancho San Antonio of the South Bay. Dogs on leashes self-guided interpretive trail Most popular of all district sites, the permitted- Access is from Page Mill explaining earthquake features. preserve in the foothills of Los Altos Road, 3.5 miles south of 1-280, with Docents lead walks on this trail at parking for two cars at roadside 2 p.m. Sundays. Parking is available provides hikers, equestrians, pullout on the south side, identified at the preserve, located on Page Mill picnickers and joggers with varied by brown e ate and wood rail Road, 5 miles south of 1-280 and 1 environments, from oak shaded pipe p g creekside settings to grassy fence. mile east of Skyline Boulevard. meadows. Core of the preserve is Fremont Older Monte Bello Deer Hollow Farm, a working farm Tie preserve is named for Fremont Page Mill Road Area. Largest of the with farm animals and old buildings. Cider, famed early day San Fran- district's preserves, the scenic 2,634 Operated by the city of Mountain c sco newpaper editor who, with his acre Monte Bello encompasses View as an environmental education wife Cora. owned a portion of the Black Mountain, the upper Stevens facility, the farm is closed Mondalus, p,eser-,.e for 60 years. Their house, Creek Watershed, oak-covered but surrc-endingpreserve is open now leased to a private party and woodlands and lush evergreen every day. There are 10 miles of restored, is occasionally open to the forest. It has 13 miles of trails, mostly gentle trails. Restrooms and public for tours. The 734-acre including a 3-mile self-guided nature drinking water are available at the p-eserve, extending towards Mt. trail. Brochures available at parking Rancho San Antonio County Park Eden Road to the south and Stevens area on south side of Page Mill parking area at the end of Cristo C-eek County Park to the west, has Road, 5 miles west of 1.280 inter. Rey Drive, Los Altos. Brochures 4.5 miles of hiking, bicycling and section. Docent-led walks available at site. 22 Duveneck Windmill Pasture Parks, Stevens Creek Park and Windy Hill A major part of the preserve, lo- Monte Bello Open Space Preserve. Grassland ridges and wooded cated in Los Altos Hills near Foot ravines with creeks that flow year hills College, was a gift from Frank Sierra Azul 5 Kenned Road Area. Located in Los round characterize this preserve that y and Josephine Duveneck and has 9.4 miles of trails and athree- adjoins the rest of Hidden Villa Gatos, the preserve provides access thr ough rough to the Sierra Azul Range table picnic area adjacent to the Ranch. Main feature is the pasture in parking area on Skyline Boulevard the shadow of Monte Bello Ridge rugged terrain on 3+ miles of trails. 2 miles south of La Honda Road. and Black Mountain. Parking is Access is from Kennedy Road, 2 Dogs leashes allowed a Road. miles east of Los Gatos Boulevard. g g'available on Rhus Ridge Road off Hated areas. Brochures at the Moody Road. Obtain brochure at Maps at district office. trailhead. district office. Skyline Ridge Russian Ridge Located in the Santa Cruz Moun- A grassy ridgeline just west of Sky. tains, the former Skyline Ranch pro- line Boulevard near the Alpine Road perty offers ridgetops, pastures, re- intersection, the preserve includes servoirs and a Christmas tree farm State Parks Borel Hill and the headwaters of with equestrian and hiking trails, Mindego Creek. Three miles of trails linking the preserve with Monte Bello Open Space Preserve. Parkin offer panoramic views from p p g Big Basin Redwoods Monterey Bay to San Francisco and available on east side of Skyline Boulevard near Alpine Road. Obtain Big Basin Redwoods State Park, the East Bay hills. Parking is avail- located in the Santa Cruz Mountains, able on Skyline near Alpine Road map at district office. became California's first state park in and one mile northwest at a vista Stevens Creek Nature 1902. Attractions include magnifi- point. Obtain site map at district Study Area cent coastal redwoods (Sequoia office. This birdwatcher's paradise is sempervirens), many of them more located adjacent to and east of Ste. than 2,000 years old; springs, San Mateo County Bayl vens Creek and Mountain View's waterfalls and a dozen creeks. Comprising East Palo Alto's bay ay edge near Cooley Landing and an Shoreline Park. For entry, enter Streamside vegetation includes syca- Shoreline Park from Stierlin Road more, alder, maple trees, ferns, adjacent salt pond, this reserve is and park near golf course. gooseberries, thimbleberries and open by permit only. Contact district wildflowers. The Big Basin head- office. Thornewood g A former 87-acre estate, Thorne- quarters is located on Highway 236, Saratoga Gap wood and its 9 landscaping are typi- 8 miles from Waterman Gap. Wooded with Douglas firs, large cal of gracious summer estates of Castle Rock oaks and madrones, the preserve is the 1920s. It is located on La Hon- Located 2.5 miles south of Saratoga located at the northern corner of the da Road (Highway 84) 1.2 miles Gap on Highway 35, the smaller junction of Big Basin Way (Highway south of the Portola Road intersec. Castle Rock State Park connects 9) and Skyline Boulevard. The inter- tion in Woodside. Access is limited with Big Basin via the Skyline to the section serves as a trailhead for trails to hikers and bicyclists who must Sea Trail, a 30-mile hiking, and part leading to Sanborn County Park, obtain a permit from the district equestrian, trail in the Santa Cruz Castle Rock and Big Basin State office. Mountains. Descending from the skyline ridges of Castle Rock above Saratoga to the Pacific at the Ran- cho del Oso unit of Big Basin, the trail offers spectacular vistas, a wide variety of fauna and flora and over- night trail camps. Portola ~ Set in groves of redwoods, Portola State Park in the La Honda vicinity is reached via Page Mill Road and then continuing on Alpine Road about 5 miles west of Highway 35. The park has hiking trails, 52 family i campsites with tables, stoves and r food lockers; and accommodations 5 CREExSma=oAKS.� for trailers up to 22 feet and motor = homes up to 26 feet. A group K campsite holding up to 150 people and group picnic area holding up to 100 can be reserved by calling Quiet Living 948-9098. 23 -- FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 5, 1986 From: Save Our Coast Committee Contact: Lennie Roberts Post Office Box 943 (415) 854-0449 or Redwood City, CA 94064 Tim Duff (415) 853-1238 SHARP RESPONSE TO SAN MATEO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PLAN TO PLACE COMPETING MEASURE ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT. On August 4, the Board of Supervisors voted to place a measure on the November, 1986 ballot which would defeat the Coastal Protection Initiative - even if the Initiative passes. Proponents of the Coastal Protection Initiative charged today that the Board's action was unprincipled and deceptive. "Their agenda is to retain their power to deal away the coast to exploitation by special economic interests and supporters, " stated Lennie Roberts, Chair of the Save Our Coast Committee. "These same development interests are placing enormous pressure on the Board to weaken the safeguards in the Local Coastal Program (LCP). The Board has shown a willingness to weaken the protections of the LCP and to allow development to sprawl beyond previously adopted urban growth limits. The Board does not want to let the voters have a direct voice in the future of the rural agricultural and timber lands." Initiative sponsors also attacked the Board's position as inconsistent. "It's hypocrisy. The Board is taking the position that the voters cannot be trusted on protection of the county's farm lands. The Save Our Coast Committee believes they can and should be trusted with these decisions as much as on the oil issue, " stated Roberts. "The Board is seeking to mislead the voters so that a majority would vote for contradictory positions on the Board's power to overturn existing coastal safeguards. They are trying to advance their self-interest by confusing the voters. They are trying to subvert the initiative process. Their actions show a disregard for the 33,313 persons who signed the petitions," stated Roberts. i �i _ mar.... .,MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: F.Y.I . DATE: August 13 , 1986 .ltl �,► �+01lt li/tlP�lErt'�aEF�$m.=.� '��;y=�. rl Now�►lara���n�CO�ief Christine M_Goilig.1m.,was 4 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT appointed planning-director for , San Mateo,County-yesterday, OLD MILL OFFICE CENTER,BUILDING C,SUITE 135 placing David Hale,who resigned 201 SAN ANTONIO CIRCLE,MOUNTAIN VIEW,CALIFORNIA 94040 in April.Gouig,who h`as,bien the �i (415)949-5500 county s housing directo 4or th& j Past year,will assume>�$57,W job on September.2 e is a for- August 12, 1986 finer executive..directorof soliontw County's`--CoMmutni • v ment.Co A, , Christine Gouig ,:. Planning Director San Mateo County County Government Center Redwood City, CA 94063 Dear Ms. Gouig, On behalf of the District' s Board of Directors and staff, con- gratulations on your appointment as San Mateo County Planning Director! I look forward to seeing you on August 25th at the Planning Commission meeting. I would also like to invite you to visit our office in the near future and meet our staff, look at our maps, and get a feeling for our organization. Perhaps we can set a time on the 25th. I� Enclosed are some of our printed materials for your perusal. Sincerely, Herbert Grench General Manager ,/cc: Board of Directors -e-^brt A Grench,General Manager Board of Directors:Katherine Duffy,NoneEte G.Hanko,Teena Renshaw,Richard S.RLnhan._Fd�H�r�11;Shnllav Mw•_o,a r,...,a,_o,,.:,�ra_mate.,..:.. } PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSIONERS' ANC► 130ARD MEMBERS" COUNCIL SUMMER MEETING Join your fellow members for an evening of good conversation, good Italian food and fun entertainment! HOST: South San Francisco Park and Recreation Commissioners WHEN: Friday, August 22, 1986 WHERE: Municipal Services Building 33 Arroyo Drive South San Francisco TIME: 5:30 PM to 6:30 PM No Host Bar - Beer and Wine 6:30 PM Dinner COST: $14.50 Per Person (Including Tax and Tip) Guests Welcome MENU: Tossed Green Salad and Vinaigrette Dressing Antipasto Cup Garlic Bread Stuffed Meat and Cheese Pasta Shells Chocolate Cheese Cake and Champagne with Strawberries Coffee or Tea RSVP: Please complete form below and return before August 15, 1986 to: Ginny Hayne Recreation and Community Services Department P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, Ca 94083 ------------------------------------------ DETACH HERE i BAY AREA PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSIONERS' AND BOARD MEMBERS' COUNCIL Name: Day Phone: Number of Reservations: Total Amount Enclosed: Please make checks payable to: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO . SEE ENCLOSED MAP. FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CALL (415) 877-8560. .f � s.//./ t /•, l�1. _. i .� For All !•le . 't, ��. Interested Parties. Sponeored, By;' PARK AND fR1U-C1x EA?10N C0WNSS10t4E1RS" A1`,'9D HOSTS Sat). bianciGC0 State University, BOARD MEMBERS- ' COUNCIL Reeltiation F- Loistire Sidt.�les, SATURDAY, 13 SL'P1VwP2-R 1986 8:00 A.M. CONMENTAL BERAKFAST R�GzsTR.�Tx©�l . Sessions will be for the novice to experienced person, on goal setting, legislation up date, objectives (short & 2art range). B ng )• HOOK SCRbrYPTIOUS LNI CH BRING: Handbooks, Girt Catalogs, Minutes, Agendas, Annual Reports for oux "IDEA SHARING". KEY NMR S ',R: RAY MURRAY, U.S. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE. 400 P.M. SNACKS- .NE'NORKING & SHARING OF IDEAS. ANY EXCESS MONP6Y WILL BE IM&D IN OUR C..E310LARSHIP PROGRAM (DIRECTLY HF LPIFG STtMENT S IN RECREATION) SEND US YOUR IDEAS, QUESTIONS. ETC.. . AS OUR GOA; IS TO MAKE THIS WORKSHOP . MEAl3INGFUL AND USEFUL i'0 ALL PARTICIFATpNTS. NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP': H. PHONE(_ } BUSIAfkES,S PHONEL_ ACE.NCY: AGENCY PHOA`E{ } $20.00 REGISTRATION: POSTMARKED BEFORE 1 SE . Y"F.MBER AFT&P.. 1 SEPIWIB&R: FRs IS $77.00 ` MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE: TO BARCBMC IDEAS: i RETURN _'O: JEAN JOH-NSTON, P.O. BOX M1, PACIFICA, CA 9404-4 ' INFORRATION (415) :55-2255 PROPOSIE'D 3,1ALAW .' E'S ------------------- ------- Revise Art -.L' c le V , Sectlon 1 . fullows : A At the Spring .Fj t 4 n 0 f !- resident shall appoint norr-Ji,.1tirig Of three members who rill present a slate of noniiiieej at the Fall Meeting. C. Additional cand- idiates in a,, he nominated from the floor prior to the election vote at the ,Fal.1 Meeting. D. Officers shall be elected at the Fall Meeting and shall be installed at the Annual Meeting and shall serve immediately thereafter for a term of One year , w.-, th the exception of the Directors-at-Large. E. Directors-at-Lay-ge shall be elected for a term of two years, three Directors being elected at each Fall Meeting . Directors-at-Large will begin immediately after the Annual Meeting . their service Note: Items B, and F through I are unchanged . Revise Article VI , Section 1 . Council Meetings asfollows: A. Regular meetings shall be field quarterly , generally with the Winter Meeting in early February , the Spring Meeting in April , the Summer Meeting in July , and the Fall Meeting in October . The time and place of the shall be determined by the Board . C. The Winter Meeting shall be the Annual Meeting. Note : Items B and D are unchanged . Revise Article VII , Section 1 . Finances as follows : A. A nominal overcharge of ' $1 . 00 on the dinner price at regular meetings shall be made to cover the minor operating expenses of the Council . Revise Article IV, Section i . C. Secretary . C- S. Shall mail minutes of Council meetings to all member commissions and boards with the notice of the next Council meeting. 21 June 1986 i d a mm C MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT TO: Board of Directors FROM: N. Hanko, Director SUBJECT: F.Y.I. DATE: August 13, 1986 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM August 11, 1986 TO: Open Space Task Force FROM: N. Hanko SUBJECT: Implementing Open Space Preservation Dear Members of the Task Force: The following report is a proposal for the implementation of open space preservation for Santa Clara County. It is based on my under- standing of the resources in need of permanent protection, and my personal experience as one of the principal founders of the Midpenin- sula Regional Open Space District and elected Director since its formation in 1972. To date, the District has acquired and preserved 21,208 acres of open space in the northwestern area of Santa Clara County and southern San Mateo County, and a small adjacent area in Santa Cruz County (see Hugh Graham August 5 report, pages 4 and 5) . The History of the Formation of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District and How the Boundaries Were Decided The boundaries of the present district were decided by two important factors. The first was a 1970 study of the nine-square-mile foothills of Palo Alto, prepared for the City by the planning firm of Livingston and Blayney. This study pointed out the need to preserve a larger area than the Palo Alto hills ; and suggested the formation of a dis- trict which could acquire privately held lands threatened by develop- ment located south of the San Francisco Watershed to provide a green- belt between San Carlos and Los Gatos. The second factor was that the area of the midpeninsula contained a very environmentally aware and active citizenry, which has traditionally supported the funding for parks. and open space. Those of us who took up the challenge of forming the new district prepared a survey of public opinion from Los Gatos to San Carlos to determine whether the voters were willing to tax themselves for the new agency. The boundaries were drawn according to the positive responses , which just fortunately coincided with the geographical area recommened by Livingston and Blayney. Although the City of Palo Alto had commissioned the study, the imple- mentation was accomplished by a strong citizens ' organization whose efforts were supported by the local newspapers and the endorsements of the cities proposed to be included (see attached editorial) . Formation of the district required approval by the Boards of Super- visors of both San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties . At that point in time the San Mateo County Board was out of touch with the popular sentiment of the south county and refused to place the measure on Page two the ballot. So the District was first formed by the voters in Santa Clara County in 1972 . In 1976 , a citizen sponsored petition for annexation was approved by the voters of south San Mateo County to add the missing area from the original geographical concept. District holdings (fee and easementQ now consists of 12,548 acres in Santa Clara County, 8-,.39,5 acres in San Mateo County, and 265 acres in Santa Cruz County. Why the Regional Park and Open Space District Law Was Chosen For Implementation and Why I'm Recommending It For the New South Valley Open Space District The founders of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District chose the Regional Park District law (Public Resources Code Section 5500 et seq. __see attachment) as the governing law. This law authorized park, recreation, and open space functions and was later amended to allow the naming of the district to reflect the regional park, open space or park and open space emphasis of a particular agency. This choice was based on reasons which I believe to be important in the consider- ation of a new South Valley Open space District. They are as follows: 1. Enabling legislation already in existence (no need to spend valuable time in trying to get new legislation) . 2 . Enabling legislation provides an existing district to serve as model (either to follow or improve upon) . Only the East Bay Regional Park District was in existence in 1972. Our citizens ' formation efforts inspired citizens of Marin County and the Monterey Peninsula also -to form districts in 1972. 3. Goals of new agency can be set forth in the ballot argument of the proponents . Gentlemen' s/Ladies' agreements can take place with the Board of Supervisors which set forth the district's intended charter. In the case of Midpeninsula, one understanding with the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, was that the new Dis- trict would be an open space agency and would not compete with the County in providing high-intensity park development. Our Gentlemen's/Ladies ' agreement with the County was that no more than 5% of our revenue would be spent on capital improvements of District lands for the first 10 years. Those of us who were elected Directors have upheld these commitments and have developed policies accordingly to guide the District' s long range plans. 4. The open space district law provides for flexibility for future years . In the case of Midpeninsula, the enabling legislation permits development for more intensive recreational uses. The founders believed that the new agency should retain this right for future Boards ' consideration based on public sentiment in years to come. 5 . One of the most important factors in choosing the park district law was the availability of borrowing power. We were concerned that the revenue derived from the property tax would be insuf- ficient for a Board to act quickly enough in acquiring some of the more close-in and threatened lands. Under park district code, we may borrow on our 4 year anticipated revenue so that we are able to purchase lands in the early years before they are too expensive. It has been our experience that land appreciates in value no matter what changes in zoning regulations occur. But they do appreciate faster when increased density is allowed. Page three 6 . A single purpose district is better able to get the job done than any joint-powers city or county agency, which has sewers, jails , etc. to weigh in importance at budget time. Funding is a separate tax that is earmarked only for open space purposes , and elected representatives are clearly visible to the electorate as being responsible for open space preservation. Forming a New District and Practical Steps to be Taken The public attitudes survey conducted by the City of San Jose is extremely helpful in establishing the wishes of San Jose residents . It is important for a survey of registered voters to occur in the other contiguous communities that might be interested in joining (Santa Clara, Campbell, Milpitas , Gilroy, and Morgan Hill) . This survey needn' t be as extensive; but it should establish a strong interest in preservation and willingness of the voters to fund it. This is an important first step for any committee to implement the new district formation. It would make known the existence of voter support, and therefore aid greatly in obtaining endorsements from the city councils of supporting areas. If there is discovered an area that is really not supportive , boundaries can be drawn to exclude this area. For example, if only San Jose , Santa Clara, Milpitas, and Campbell were surveyed in favor, it might be reasonable to form just a 5-member board, keeping the door open for a 7-member board with future annexation (s) . After a survey is conducted and boundaries of contiguous territory are drawn, the implementing committee submits its proposal to the Local Agency Formation Commission with a request to circulate a petition for 5,000 signatures of registered voters. Once signed, the petition is filed with the Board of Supervisors, and a public hearing called, at which time the Board of Supervisors will consider calling an election within the proposed boundaries of the district. The district cannot be formed without such an election. If the election is called, then the proposed new district is divided into 5 or 7 wards of equal population for the purpose of electing directors . Directors are elected at the same time as the question of the formation of the new district is answered by the voters. A majority vote establishes the district. $$$$$$$$$$ Now we come to the big question. How would the new District be financed? Again the San Jose attitude survey is helpful since it points to the residents' understanding of what would constitute a fair tax: value to the property owners. If an ad valorem tax is not possible, then a parcel tax should be considered. My preference would be a formula that would tax all developed property, but commercial/industrial parcels at a higher rate based on square footage, if value is not permissible as a basis. Undevbloped parcels should receive a lesser tax because they were unoccupied. I believe that undeveloped property should receive some kind of incentive to remain undeveloped. A parcel tax in addition to the borrowing power provided to districts formed under Public Resources Code, Sec. 5500, might provide suffi- cient funds. However, I think other committee members may have additional ideas that need to be explored. Page four Midpeninsula' s General Manager Herb Grench has suggested that the idea be explored of including the existing Santa Clara County territory of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District in any ballot measure for financing. The existing and new districts would receive revenue raised within each district' s area. Given the historically strong north-County financial commitment for parks and open space, overall voter support could be gained, and the added MROSD funding used for Midpeninsula' s program. The Use of Eminent Domain: Should it Be Shared or Approved By County or Cities? Eminent Domain is a power held by virtually all public agencies. It is this power that assures that the broader public interest is upheld in cases where that interest may be at variance with private interests. It must be exercised cautiously by directors who are elected by the voters of the district and cannot be delegated to another public body who was not elected by the voters to exercise that power for the district. Moreover, I think there is great wisdom in separating the actions of (city and County) zoning bodies from land acquisition bodies, and greater safety in regard to any question of inverse condemnation. Midpeninsula has used this power rarely and only when there were active plans to subdivide and develop a property. However, the existence of that power has created suspicion of Midpeninsula on the part of my residents. Our long standing policy has been to work with private interests to preserve and enhance open space in the District' s planning area. It has been difficult to carry that policy forward because of the suspicion engendered by the absence of policies. This year the Board adopted policies on the restraint of use of eminent domain, whereby the power may be exercised only in cases of subdivision action by the property owner or for trail connections under specific guidelines (see attached document) . Whether or not there should be policies or what should be included in such policies of restraint is best addressed through the campaign for directors, where voters may choose those directors who best represent their positions on this issue. Midpeninsula' s Eminent Domain policy was worked out with the co- operation and advice of the hillside property owners. It represents a policy that is sensitive to the concerns of the landowners who would like to live on and maintain their open space lands. It is also responsive to the broad interests of the public who have voted for the protection of open space. Our Board sees this policy as the cornerstone for improved relationships with the neighbors who share the hill lands with us. Why a New District? While the East Bay Regional Park District and the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District are contiguous (we meet in the middle of the bay) , we have acknowledged our different agendas and at the same time are open and helpful to one another, particularly when we are working together in Sacramento for common interests. I feel certain that Midpeninsula' s Board would be enthusiastic about another contiguous open space agency with whom we could share advice and could contract with one another to accomplish acquisitions of bordering lands through joint-powers agreements. Page five A greenbelt type of agency needs to be well unformed of all lands and ownerships in the district's planning area; different from a park agency that acquires separate units for individual parks. A greenbelt type of agency needs to recognize property owners not only for their contributions in preserving private open space lands, but also be cognizant of their fears of public intrusion. District staff members need tc, be not only well informed as to the resources to be protected but also need to take the time to be part of the hillside neighborhood . I strongly believe that two agencies working alongside one another at their maximum efficiency is preferable to a diluted effort of a large agency with mixed agendas. The park and open space districts meet to discuss subjects of mutual interest. When Mid peninsula was formed, East Bay management served on evaluation committees to help us select our general manager. East Bay land acquisition staff advised us on acquisition methods. William Penn Mott was one of our advisors, so you can see that park and open space district have contacts at the very top. The law under which the park and open space districts are governed is a good one, and I strongly recommend that you put your preser- vation eggs into this basket. Ours OPINIONS ***yours a. .others Page 20 PALO ALTO TIMES, PALO ALTO, CALIF., MONDAY, FEB. 16, 1970 EDITORIALS Area approach to open space Will the hills above the Midpeninsula be in danger of falling into the old con- be open or occupied? servationist trap of fighting rear-guard Or will there be a rational mix based battles (such as the legal entanglement -an sound planning principles and land it is now in relating to Stanford's Coy- use economics? ote Hill), or of concentrating on lobby- These critical questions are now in the process of being studied and answered ing-type activity among local officials. —to a large extent — by a two-year, Some look hopefully to higher gov- $144,000 "environmental design study" ernmental levels for aid in saving the for the Palo Alto hills area. open spaces. Others are groping for That area just happens to lie in the new approaches to restrictive land zon- heart of a broader Peninsula backbone ing to discourage land development. stretch of ridge and hill land, future Meanwhile, hills landowners (many of directions of which may likely be de- whom are highly sympathetic to con- cided in coming months. servation goals) are being taxed to the Both developers and conservation- edge of the canyon, so to speak. ists are watching the outcome of the If the conservationists and others who Palo Alto study, and some are working value the view from the flatlands are in their own ways to influence it. really serious, they should take this time But meanwhile, there is a variety to examine their ultimate priority— un- of forces at work independent of the developed open space — and move to study that could influence the hills' set up an agency capable of being a re- destiny at least as much as the study cipient for land, either donated, willed - itself. or purchased through whatever local In Palo Alto, there is a 530-acre, high state or federal funds may be available. density lower foothills development pro- This worked in the East Bay. Why not posal working its way through city pol- the west? icy levels amid increasing doubts (from a variety of observers) that it will emerge looking much like the way it went in. In the upper hills, a group of proper- ty owners is trying to put together a "conservation-minded" investor group to combine preservation of open space with development where it will do the least ecological and esthetic damage. Farther north, however, the open ridge is being threatened by housing and logging interests which San Mateo County officials have been unwilling or unable (or both) to control. Conservationists, such as those in the Committee for Green Foothills, seem to CLAIMS No. 86-15 - Meeting 86-19 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Date: August 13, 1986 : C L A I M S Amount Name Description 9811 226.69* ANR Freight System Delivery Charges 9812 351 .79 AT&T Information Systems Group Telephone Equipment 9813 88.00 Automatic Solar Covers, Inc. Pool Cover Repair--Bullis 9814 100.00 Scott Buschman Photographs 9815 1 ,919.80 Cal Clay Trail Surfacing Material 9816 . 1 ,000.00 California Advocates, Inc. Legislative Consultant Fee--July 9817 22.26 Patrick Congdon Private Vehicle Expense 9818 16.27 Crest Copies, Inc. Bluelines 9819 188.92 Alice Cummings Reimbursement--Meal Conference and Private Vehicle Expense 9820 6,000.00 DANA Property Analysis Appraisal Services 9821 326.35 The Darkroom Enlargements and Photo Processing 9822 25.84 Discount Office Supply Office Supplies 9823 i62.45 E1 Monte Stationers Office Supplies 9824 95. 10 Emed Company, Inc. Hazard Signs 9825 20.00 Federal Express Corporation Express Mail 9826 - 40.74 Jean Fiddes Private Vehicle Expense 9827 550.00 Foss & Associates Personnel Consulting] Fee--July 9828 15.95 Fulcrum, Inc. Library Document 9829 150.28 Herbert Grench Reimbursement--Meal Conference and Out- of-Town Meeting Expense 9830 90. 13 Walter Goggin Private Vehicle Expense 9831 51 .75 Graphistat, Inc. Artwork 9832 350.00 David H. Griffith, Assc. , Ltd. Consulting Fee--SB90 9833 67.83 Mary Gundert Reimbursement--Postage and Private Vehicle Expense 9834 15. 15 Harbinger Communications Computer Expense. 9835 5,000.00 J. M. Construction Bridge--San Mateo County Baylands 9836 2,419.70 . Jeffries Banknote Company Printing--1986 Note Issue 9837 525.00 Los Altos Garbage Company Dumpster Rental 9838 247.00 Miracle Auto Painting District Vehicle Repair 9839 226.43 Mobil Oil Company Fuel and Repairs for District Vehicles 9840 50.00 Charlotte J. MacDonald Consulting Fee 9841 156. 16 Meredith Newspapers Legal Advertisements 9842 47.25 National Recreation and Park Association Subscription 9843 167.35 Joyce Nicholas Reimbursement--Recognition Pins %` Issued as Emergency Check on July 22, 1986 Claims No. 86-1.5.. Meeting 86-1g ,. Date: August 13, 1986 Amount Name Description 9844 7.00 Noble Ford Tractor, Inc... Repair Parts for Tractor I 9845 20.85 Norney's' Office Supplies d 9846 756.54 Pacific Bell Telephone Service 9847 5,354.93 Pacific Financial Printing Official Statement Printing--1986 Note 9848 223.25 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Utilities 9849 3.85 Peninsula Blueprint, Inc. Bluelines 9850 385.09 Petters Office Furnishings File Cabinet 9851 250.00 Real Gas & Electric Company, Inca Consulting Fees 9852 22.09 Rancho Cobbler and Cleaner Uniform Expense 9853 75.31 Rancho Hardware Field Supplies 9854 251 .45 Redwood Trade Bindery Brochure Folding 9$55 500.00 B. J. Rickard Caretaker--Former Bullis Property 9856 20.85 Roberts and Brune Company Field Supplies 9857 750.00 San Mateo County Application Fees--Purisima Parking Areer= 9858 27.30 David Sanguinetti Private Vehicle Expense 9859 739.98 Scribner Graphic Press Printing 9860 14.72 Sears, . Roebuck and Company Field Supplies 9861 226.84 Service Printing Company Election :Forms 9862 5, 190.00 Eugene Sheehan Consulting Services--Trail Construction° 9863 1 , 125.64 John Sheldon, Inc. Culverts for Purisima 9864 579.41 Shell Oil Company Repairs and Fuel for District Vehicles 9865 5,500.00 Standard and Poor's Corporation Bond Rating--1986 Note Issue 9866 954.00 Trail Information and Volunteer Center Volunteer Trail Construction 9867 1 ,950.56 Rod Tripp Range Consultant 9868 10.00 U S Rentals Equipment Rental 9869 85.00 University of California Seminar--Doris Smith 9870 52.43 Vallen Safety Supply Company Field Supplies 9871 624.00 Value Business Systems Machine Maintenance 9872 114.24 Sandy Voorhees Private Vehicle Expense 9873 23.30 Western Elections Election Forms 9874 3,242. 10 Western Fire Equipment Company Fire Fighting Equipment 9875 79.59 Del Woods Private Vehicle Expense 9876 1 ,590.00 Yeager Ford Tractor, Inc. Equipment Rental 9877 1 ,050.00 Ortha Zebroski Landscape Architect Consulting Fees 9878 32.09 Kevin Zirzow Reimbursement--Uniform Expense Claims No. 86--15 Meeting 86-19 Date: August 13, 1986 Amount Name Description 9879 125,000.00** Big Creek Lumber Company,. Option Payment--Hosking 9880 165,000.00** The Alan' Hosking Ranch, ..lnc. Option Payment--Hosking 9881 10,000.00** The Alan Hosking Ranch, Inc. Option Payment--Hosking ** Total of $300,000.00 Option Payment for Hosking property as previously approved by the Board on February 26, 1986. Claim No. 9881 is for gate installation. P CLAIMS No. 86-15 Meting 86-19 MIDPENINSL . A REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Date: August 13, 1986 C L REVISED . A I M S _ Arflunt Name Description 9811 226.69` ANR Freight System Delivery Charges 9812 351 .79 AT&T Information Systems' Group Telephone Equipment 9813 88.00 Automatic Solar Covers, Inc. Pool Cover Repair--Bullis 9814 100.00 Scott Buschman Photographs 9815 1 ,919.80 Cal Clay Trail Surfacing Material 9816 1 ,000.00 California Advocates, Inc. Legislative Consultant Fee--July 9817 22.26 Patrick Congdon Private Vehicle Expense 9818 16.27 Crest Copies, Inc. Bluelines 9819 188.92 Alice Cummings Reimbursement--Meal Conference and Private Vehicle Expense 9820 6,000.00 DANA Property Analysis Appraisal Services 9821 326.35 The Darkroom Enlargements and Photo Processing 9822 25.84 Discount Office Supply Office Supplies 3323 162.45 El Monte Stationers Office Supplies 9824 95. 10 Emed Company, Inc. Hazard Signs 9825 20.00 Federal Express Corporation Express Mail 9826 40.74 Jean Fiddes Private Vehicle Expense 9827 550.00 Foss & Associates Personnel Consulting Fee--July 9828 15.95 Fulcrum, Inc. Library Document 9829 150.28 Herbert Grench Reimbursement--Meal Conference and Out- of-Town Meeting Expense 9830 90. 13 Walter Goggin Private Vehicle Expense 9831 51 .75 Graphistat, Inc. Artwork 9832 350.00 David M. Griffith, Assc. , Ltd. Consulting Fee--SB90 9833 67.83 Mary Gundert Reimbursement--Postage and Private Vehicle Expense 9834 15. 15 Harbinger Communications Computer Expense 9835 5,000.00 J. M. Construction Bridge--San Mateo County Baylands 9836 2,419.70 _ . Jeffries Banknote Company Printing--1986 Note Issue 837 525.00 Los Altos Garbage Company Dumpster Rental 9838 247.00 Miracle Auto Painting District Vehicle Repair 9839 226.43 Mobil Oil Company Fuel and Repairs for District Vehicles 9840 50.00 Charlotte J. MacDonald Consulting Fee 9841 156. 16 Meredith Newspapers Legal Advertisements 9842 47.25 National Recreation and Park Association Subscription 9843 167.35 Joyce Nicholas Reimbursement--Recognition Pins Issued as Emergency Check on July 22, 1986 Claims No. 86-15 Meeting 86-19 - Date: August 13, 1986 Jt REVISED Amount Name Description 9844 7.00 Noble Ford Tractor, Inc. . Repair Parts for Tractor 9845 20.85 NorneY's Office Supplies 9846 756.54 Pacific/Bell Telephone Service 9847 5,354.93 Pacific Financial Printir Official Statement Printing--1986 Note 984$ 223.25 Paci.f`ic Gas and Electrizlomp ny Utilities 9849 3.85 Peninsula Blueprint, . nc. Blue] ines 9350 385.09 Petters Office Furn shings File Cabineti" ` 9851 250.00 Real Gas & Elect.r, c Company', Inc. Consulting )sees 9852 22.09 Rancho Cobbler 4 ►d Cleaner Uniform Expense 9853 75.31 Rancho Hardware Fie1d� Supplies 9854 251 .45 Redwood Trad ' Bindery Brbchuroks Folding 9855 500.00 B. J. Rickard Caretaker--Former Bullis Property 9856 20.85 g Roberts and Brune Company "Field Supplies 9857 750.00 k San Matep County Application Fees--Purisima Parking Area 9858 27.30 David Sanguinetti Private Vehicle Exlise M, 9859 739.98 Scribner Graphic Press " Printing ° 9860 14.72 Sear , Roebuck and Company � � Field Supplies 9861 226.84 Sere ice Pr i nt i ngMCompany g Ell ect i on .Forms° .... 4`* 9362 5, 190.00 Ejene Sheehan , Consulting Services--Trail Construction 9863 1 ,125.64 16hin Sheldon, C. Culverts far Puri s ima 9864 579.41 Shell Oil Company Repairs ad Ful for District Vehicles J 9865 5,500.00 '. Standard and P�oor's Corporation Bond Raging--1986 Note Issue 9866 954.00 Trail Information and /olunteer `Y Center Volunteer Tril Construction 9867 1 ,950.56 Rod Tripp Range Consultant 9868 10.00 U S Rentals 1 Equh]pment Rental 9869 85:88 dnttre�s+ y-s -6a�- eraia Snrnar--Be +s-S�+fib - Canceled 9870 52.43 Vallen Safety Supply Company Meld Supples 9871 624.00 Value Business-Systems thachine Maintenance 9872 114.24 Sandy Voorhees Private Vehicle Expense 9873 23.30 Western Elections Election Forms 9874 3,242. 10 Western Fire Equipment Company Fire Fighting Equipment 9875 79.59 Del Woods Private Vehicle Expense 9876 1 ,590.00 Yeager Ford Tractor, Inc. Equipment Rental 9877 1 ,050.00 Ortha Zebroski Landscape Architect Consulting Fees 9878 32.09 Kevin Zirzow Reimbursement--Uniform Expense Claims No. 86-15 s Meeting 86-19 - Dated August 13, 1986 Amount Name REVISED • Description 5344 7.00 Noble Ford Tractor, Inc. . Repair Parts for Tractor 9845 20.85 Norney's.- Office Supplies .�.346 756.54 Pacific Bell - Telephone Service 5347 5,354.93 Pacific Financial Printing Official Statement Printing--1986 Note 9848 223.25 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Utilities 0849 3.85 Peninsula Blueprint, Inc. Bluelines 9350 385.09 Petters Office Furnishings File Cabinet 9851 250.00 Real Gas E Electric Company, Inc. Consulting Fees 9852 22.09 Rancho Cobbler and. Cleaner Uniform Expense 9853 75.31 Rancho Hardware Field Supplies 9854 251 .45 Redwood Trade Bindery Brochure Folding 9855 500.00 B. J: Rickard Caretaker--Former Bullis Property 9856 20.85 Roberts and Brune Company Field Supplies 9857 750.00 San Mateo County Application Fees--Purisima Parking Area 9853 27.30 David Sanguinetti Private Vehicle Expense °859 739.98 Scribner Graphic Press Printing 9860 14.72 Sears, Roebuck and Company Field Supplies 5861 226.84 Service Printing Company Election .Forms k 5362 5, 190.00 Eugene Sheehan Consulting Services--Trail Construction 9863 1 ,125.64 John Sheldon, Inc. Culverts for Purisima 5864 579.41 Shell Oil Company Repairs and Fuel for District Vehicles 9$65 5,500.00 Standard and Poor's Corporation Bond Rating--1986 Note Issue a366 954.00 . Trail Information and Volunteer Center Volunteer Trail Construction 0867 1 .950.56 Rod Tripp Range Consultant 9858 10.00 U S Rentals Equipment Rental 5869 85:88 Un4vef5+ty-ef-Gaf+fovnia Seminar--8e +s-Sm+tb - Canceled 5370 52.43 Vallen Safety Supply Company Field Supplies 5871 624.00 Value Business Systems Machine Maintenance 5372 114.24 Sandy Voorhees Private Vehicle Expense 5373 23.30 Western Elections Election Forms 5374 3,242. 10 Western Fire Equipment Company Fire Fighting Equipment 5875 79.59 Del Woods Private Vehicle Expense 0,376 1 ,S90.00 Yeager Ford Tractor, Inc. Equipment Rental 01377 1 ,050.00 Ortha Zebroski Landscape Architect Consulting Fees 5873 32.09 Kevin Zirzow Reimbursement--Uniform Expense Claims No. 86-15 Meeting 86-19 Date: August 13, 1986 �= REVISED Amount Name Description 9879 125,000.00** Big Creek Lumber Company. Option Payment--Hosking 9880 165,000.00'* The A1an'. Hosking Ranch, .Inc. Option Payment--Hosking 9881 10,000.00** The Alan Hosking Ranch, Inc. Option Payment--Hosking 98$2 972.00 Glenn Smith Consulting Services 9883 228.51 Petty Cash Office and Field Supplies, Meal Conferences, Seminar and Private Vehicle Expenses Total of $300,000.00 Option Payment for Hosking property as previously approved by the Board on February 26, 1986. Claim No. 9881 is for gate installation. 1