HomeMy Public PortalAbout2019-04-04 packet
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats
as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the r equest.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Technical Committee
Thursday, April 4, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.
Meeting Location: Boone/Bancroft Room # 200, John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 - Enter through Main Lobby
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
2. Public comment
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of March 7, 2019
5. Communication Received
6. Old Business
A. 2020-2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Draft
Action Requested: Review and Discussion.
Staff Report: CAMPO staff is working on the annual update of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
and the draft is available for review. CAMPO staff has contacted CAMPO member jurisdictions for budget
information, to review existing projects in the TIP, and ask for projects for inclusion into the new TIP. Please
see the attached staff report detailing changes made to the Draft 2020-2024 TIP.
B. FY2020 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Draft
Action Requested: Review, approval, and forward to the Board of Directors.
Staff Report: CAMPO staff is working on the annual development of the Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP). The UPWP serves two functions: 1) the budget for CAMPO; and 2) determines work products and
tasks to be completed between November 1, 2019 and October 31, 2020.
C. 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Development
Action Requested: Review and Discussion.
Staff Report: A draft of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) is available for
review. The draft is approximately 90% complete. Please see the attached staff report for details on the Draft
2045 MTP.
7. New Business
A. Illustrative Project List of the 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan
Action Requested: Review, approval, and forward to the Board of Directors.
Staff Report: A workgroup consisting of a sub-set of Technical Committee members and other stakeholders
met to review and edit the Illustrative Project List to be included in the 2045 MTP. CAMPO Staff is s eeking
approval of the list.
8. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
B. Member Updates
9. Next Meeting Date – Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room #200
10. Adjournment
Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.64 57
MINUTES
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
March 7, 2019
VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT
Cole County: Larry Benz
Eric Landwehr*
Jefferson City: David Bange, Vice Chairman
Eric Barron
Matt Morasch
Sonny Sanders, Chairman
Britt Smith
MoDOT: Mike Henderson
Steve Engelbrecht
Bob Lynch
Wardsville: Paul Stonner
Pedestrian or Biking Interest: Cary Maloney
Private Transportation Interest: Joe Scheppers*
*Arrived Late
VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT
Paul Winkelmann, Callaway County
Mark Tate, Holts Summit
JJ Gates, Jefferson City
Mark Mehmert, Jefferson City
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration
Jeremiah Shuler, Federal Transit Administration
STAFF PRESENT (Non-Voting)
Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner
Alex Rotenberry, Transportation Planner
Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant
GUESTS PRESENT
Michelle Mahoney
Kim Tipton, MoDOT
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
Mr. Sanders called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m. and asked Ms. Stratman to call roll. A quorum of 11
voting members was present.
2. Public comment
None received.
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed unanimously.
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of February 7, 2019
Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Benz seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of February 7, 2019 as
written. The motion passed unanimously.
5. Communications from the presiding officer
No correspondence was received.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
March 7, 2019 Page 2
6. Old Business
A. 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Development
Mr. Scheppers arrived at 10:10 a.m.
Ms. Williams explained that the following scenarios were submitted to the Consultant: (1) trend for a 25
year planning horizon; (2) central city development; (3) unincorporated growth; and (4) triple growth. She
stated that each scenario is used to create a Travel Demand Model (TDM) that will identify potential points of
congestion and capacity issues. Ms. Williams explained that after a preferred scenario is identified, the data
will be used to develop a list of recommended improvements. She stated that the Travel Demand Models
deliverables should be received on March 15. Ms. Williams explained that public outreach including
attending the City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission and the City of Holts Summit Planning and
Zoning Commission is scheduled for March 14 and March 21 respectively. She stated that a public meeting is
scheduled for March 19. Ms. Williams explained that a workgroup session is being scheduled for later on in
March. She stated that the MTP is scheduled to be adopted in June, 2019.
B. FY 2020 Unified Planning Work Program Update
Ms. Williams explained that staff has begun work on the FY2020 Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP). She stated that this annual process starts very early due to the City of Jefferson’s budget process.
Ms. Williams explained that the FY2020 UPWP is anticipated to be adopted by May 2019. She stated that the
draft budget for FY2020 is approximately $180,153 with $144,122 (80%) funded through the Consolidated
Planning Grant and $36,031 (20%) funded through local match. Ms. Williams explained that the 20% local
match is provided by Jefferson City (75%) and Cole County (25%). She stated that based on the anticapated
FY2020 expenditure, it is projected that CAMPO will have a balance of $412,960 in unprgrammed
Consolidated Planning Grant funds. Ms. Williams explained that major activities in FY2020, developed thus
far, include: (1) Update of the Title VI Plan; (2) Update of the Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan; (3)
Update of the Public Participation Plan (PPP); (4) Development of the FY2021 UPWP; and (5) Development
of the 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program.
7. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
• JEFFTRAN Route Guide support. Ms. Williams reported that staff continues to work with
JEFFTRAN staff in finalizing a new route guide.
• Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Staff is working on the 2020-2024 TIP. This
includes asking members to review the budget information, review existing projects in the TIP, and ask
for projects for inclusion into the new TIP. The 2020-2024 TIP is anticipated to be adopted in June
2019.
• Federal Performance Measures. CAMPO staff continues collaborating with MODOT staff
concerning various federal performance measures required by MAP-21 and the FAST Act.
• Taos Sewer Map. CAMPO staff will start working with the Village of Taos in Summer 2019 to
update their sewer map.
• 5310 Applications. Staff submitted Letters of Support for Section 5310 Grant Funds.
B. Member Updates
Cole County
--Mr. Landwehr gave an update on the following: (1) replacement of certain bridges and box culverts;
(2) stormwater projects and pavement replacement projects; and (3) Tanner Bridge Road at Tara Road
safety improvement project.
Jefferson City
--Mr. Bange gave an update on the following: (1) Dunklin Street Bridge replacement and corridor
project; (2); Mesa and Chickadee stormwater project; (3) Missouri Boulevard sidewalks between Beck
Street and Waverly Street; and (4) Signage for bike routes along W Main Street and Miller Street.
--Mr. Smith gave an update on the Airport Master Plan, annual mill and overlay list, parking study and
the pavement management project.
Missouri Department of Transportation
--Mr. Engelbrecht reported that the State Transportation Improvement Program update is in progress.
He discussed the unfunded needs list.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
March 7, 2019 Page 3
-Mr. Henderson reported on Governor Parson’s proposal for infrastructure improvements since
Proposition D failed.
--Mr. Lynch reported on the following projects: (1) pavement repair in several areas along Business 50
outer road; (2) Missouri Boulevard closure at Country Club Drive to add a right hand turn lane.
Private Transportation Interest
--Mr. Scheppers discussed safety improvements at the Missouri Boulevard and South Ten Mile Drive
by McDonalds.
Wardsville
--Mr. Stonner reported on the new Casey’s at the intersection of Ashbury Waye and Route causing a
bottleneck during the morning commute. He mentioned that Mayor Stockman will be contacting MPO
staff for assistance.
8. Next Meeting Date - Thursday, April 4, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room.
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 10:57 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634 -6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
2020-2024 Transportation Improvement Program Update
April 4, 2019
Summary
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to
be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which are funded by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed ‘regionally significant.’
The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with local jurisdictions, the Missouri Department
of Transportation, and local public transportation operators.
Development of the 2020-2024 TIP has started. Included in the packet is a draft TIP with several changes
made based on discussions with MoDOT and FHWA. Changes include:
• Adding new verbage on federal performance measures to include updated safety measures, travel
time reliability and freight reliability measures, and road and bridge measures.
• Updating several jurisdictions’ Operations and Maintenance costs.
• Formatting has changed to make tables and projects easier to read.
CAMPO staff still anticipates a finalized project list from MoDOT, which will be incorporated into the
draft plan for the May Technical Committee. Not all jurisdictions have responded to CAMPO staff
requests for updated financial numbers or projects.
Items still requiring review or updating include:
• Updating financial totals for all jurisdictions
• Updating list of fiscally constrained projects
• The map of projects has not been updated.
• The JEFFTRAN Program of Projects has not been updated.
• Planning Process Self Certification needs to be inserted.
If you have questions or require additional information, I can be reached at 573-634-6525 or by email at
arotenberry@jeffcitymo.org.
Agenda Item 6C
Transportation Improvement Program
Program Years 2020 - 2024
July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2024
Adopted June 16, 2019
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal
Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this
report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of
Transportation.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the
grounds of race, color, sex, age, disability or national origin, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259).
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone: (573) 634-6410 Fax: (573) 634-6457
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1
Public Participation ....................................................................................................................................... 2
Project Selection ........................................................................................................................................... 2
TIP Development ........................................................................................................................................... 3
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications .................................................................................... 3
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects ............................................................................................................. 4
Air Quality Designation ................................................................................................................................. 4
Environmental Justice ................................................................................................................................... 4
Federal Performance Measures .................................................................................................................... 4
Financial Plan ................................................................................................................................................ 7
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding ......................................................................... 8
Operations and Maintenance ................................................................................................................. 10
Operations and Maintenance - Local Government ................................................................................ 11
Financial Constraint ................................................................................................................................ 13
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects (Projects will be updated) ................................................... 14
Figure 12 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects ............................................................... 28
Program of Projects - OATS ......................................................................................................................... 29
Figure 13 - Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN ............................................................................................... 30
Multimodal Projects .................................................................................................................................... 31
Regionally Significant Projects .................................................................................................................... 31
Appendix A – Amendments and Administrative Modifications..................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Appendix B – Federal Funding Sources .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Appendix C – Policies and Procedures ........................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Appendix D – Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification . Error! Bookmark not defined.
Appendix E – Definitions ................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
i
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
FTA 5303 Metropolitan & Statewide
Planning and NonMetropolitan
Transportation Planning
FTA 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
FTA 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors
and Individuals with Disabilities
FTA 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
Adv. Con. Advanced Construction
AM Asset Management (Replaces
TCOS in 2022)
CAMPO Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
CO Carbon Monoxide (vehicle
emissions)
EPA Environmental Protection
Agency
FAST Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act
FHWA Federal Highway
Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FY Fiscal Year
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement
Program
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in
the 21st Century
MoDOT Missouri Department of
Transportation
MPO Metropolitan Planning
Organization
MTP Metropolitan Transportation
Plan
NHFP National Highway Freight
Program
NHPP National Highway Performance
Program
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
ONE DOT Collaboration between FHWA
and FTA
PBPP Performance Based Planning
and Programming
PM-2.5 Small Particulate Matter Lead
POP Program of Projects
PY Program Year
SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
STIP State Transportation
Improvement Program
STBG Surface Transportation Block
Grant Program
TAP Transportation Alternatives
TCOS Taking Care of the System
TERM Transit Economic Requirements
Model
TIP Transportation Improvement
Program
TPM Transportation Performance
Management
VMT Vehicle Miles of Travel
ii
(Resolution approving TIP goes here)
iii
(CAMPO Board, TC, and staff listing goes here)
1
Introduction
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) is the designated metropolitan planning
organization for the Jefferson City, Missouri planning area whose purpose is to carry out a continuing,
cooperative, and comprehensive long range transportation planning process. As part of this process, in
2018, CAMPO updated the 2013-2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) with the last program
year TIP, to address the current and future transportation needs for the Metropolitan Planning Area
(MPA). The MPA includes a southern portion of Callaway County, northeastern portion of Cole County,
cities of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, and Wardsville.
Figure 1 – The CAMPO Planning Area
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects
to be implemented within the MPA. The projects are funded by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed “regionally significant.” Each project
or project phase included in the TIP is consistent with investment strategies discussed in the MTP and is
part of the process of applying for funds from the FHWA and FTA. Certain capital and non-capital
transportation projects using funding under 23 U.S.C. and 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or regionally significant
2
projects requiring action by the FHWA or the FTA are required to be included in the TIP. The TIP is
updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation and local
public transportation operators.
Public Participation
CAMPO seeks active and meaningful involvement of the public and interested parties in the development
and update of transportation plans and programs, including the TIP. All meetings of the CAMPO
Technical Committee and Board of Directors are open to the public. All meeting agendas and minutes are
available on the City of Jefferson website or upon request. CAMPO provides all interested parties and the
public with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP as required by federal law.
Reasonable opportunity to comment and participate on the proposed TIP is made following the policies in
the CAMPO Public Participation Plan located on the CAMPO website at
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo. The approved TIP is available for review at several locations
throughout the CAMPO planning area as outlined in the Public Participation Plan.
The FTA allows a grantee, e.g. JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc., to rely on locally adopted public
participation plans for the submittal of their projects in lieu of a separate “Program of Projects” (POP) if
the grantee has coordinated with CAMPO and has ensured that the public is aware that the TIP and the
Public Participation Plan are being used to satisfy the POP public participation requirements. JEFFTRAN
is the public transit provider for the City of Jefferson and OATS, Inc. is a not-for-profit 501(c)3
corporation providing specialized transportation for senior citizens, people with disabilities and the rural
general public in 87 Missouri counties. Federal Transit Administration recipients of certain categories of
funds, JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. must follow a public participation plan. Both JEFFTRAN and OATS,
Inc. meet this coordination and public awareness criteria.
Project Selection
Transportation projects, funded by direct allocation of Federal funds to a project sponsor, award of
Federal funds via competitive grant, or wholly funded by the sponsor, are selected by the agency having
jurisdiction over the project using their own criteria and submitted to the CAMPO Board of Directors for
inclusion in the TIP. Transportation projects included within the TIP should be consistent with
investment strategies discussed in the MTP.
CAMPO no longer receives STBG funds from MoDOT, nor does it have any other type of discretionary
funding for infrastructure projects. If such funds again become available, the following prioritization
process is in place.
Transportation projects, funded by sub-allocated Federal funds directly to CAMPO or otherwise made
available for programming at the discretion of CAMPO, are selected based on competitive process
approved by the CAMPO Board of Directors. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on
CAMPO priorities by staff, and review by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to
3
the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote of approval. The ranking process has unique evaluation
criteria for different categories of projects – roadway/intersection, bridge, non-motorized, transit, and
‘other.’
TIP Development
The TIP is updated every year and covers a 5-year period starting July 1, 2019. TIP development begins
with a verification of status of projects in the current TIP, solicitation of new projects, and request for
budget information from local jurisdictions. Local transit providers are also requested to provide
information needed to develop their “Program of Projects” for inclusion in the TIP. CAMPO staff, with
support from the Technical Committee, member jurisdictions, MoDOT, FHWA, and FTA, develop the
financial plan, project listings, maintenance and operations, and other components of the TIP.
Once the draft TIP is developed, it is presented to the Technical Committee for review and
recommendation to the Board of Directors. A 25 day public comment period and public hearing are held
prior to the Board of Directors approval of the TIP. The Board then requests approval of the TIP by the
Governor and ONE DOT (consisting of FHWA and FTA). More information about public involvement
activities can be found in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan.
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Between TIP updates, if projects need to be added, removed or changed, the TIP can be changed either by
amendment or administrative modifications. Definitions of an amendment or an administrative
modification, and information about public participation, notifications, and other procedures regarding
amendments and administrative modifications, can be found in Appendix C – Policies and Procedures of
this document. Appendix A contains a listing of amendments and administrative modifications that have
occurred to this document.
Previous Projects
The TIP will include a listing of major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and identify
any significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. Major projects are defined as
transportation improvement projects receiving Federal financial assistance with an estimated total cost of
$500 million or more or that have been identified by the FHWA as being a major project.
No major projects were implemented, and no significant delays or projects from the previous TIP have
been identified.
4
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) requires that CAMPO publish an annual
listing of federally obligated projects. The Annual Listing of Projects is an index of projects which used
Federal funds that were obligated in the preceding TIP program year. Obligated projects are consistent
with the funding categories identified in the TIP.
An obligation is the Federal government’s legal commitment to pay the Federal share of a project’s cost.
An obligated project is one that has been authorized and funds have been obligated by a Federal agency.
Obligated projects are not necessarily initiated or completed in the program year, and the amount of the
obligation will not necessarily equal the total cost of the project. For Federal Transit Administration
projects, obligation occurs when the grant is awarded. For Federal Highway Administration projects,
obligation occurs when a project agreement is executed and the State/grantee requests that the funds be
obligated.
CAMPO publishes the Annual Listing of Obligated Projects yearly within 90 days of the previous TIP’s
program year. The Annual Listing of Obligated Projects is posted on the CAMPO website at
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo.
Air Quality Designation
The United States Environmental Protection Agency has designated the CAMPO Metropolitan Planning
Area as being in attainment for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Small
Particulate Matter (PM-2.5) Lead, and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2).
Environmental Justice
Executive Order 12898 requires agencies receiving federal funding to meaningfully address low-income
and minority populations in their plans, programs, policies, and activities. CAMPO staff expects project
sponsors to identify and mitigate any disproportionately high and adverse effects of federal transportation
programs.
Federal Performance Measures
In the passage of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), and continuing into
the FAST Act, Congress established Transportation Performance Management (TPM). FHWA defines
TPM as a strategic approach that uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to
achieve national performance goals.
Another new requirement is Performance Based Planning and Programming (PBPP) which impacts the
TIP and the MTP. PBPP refers to the application of performance management principles within the
5
planning and programming processes of transportation agencies to achieve desired performance outcomes
for the multimodal transportation system.
To comply with these new requirements, the CAMPO Board of Directors adopted targets for four
performance areas: the Transit Asset Management, Safety, Pavement and Bridge, and Travel Time
Reliability and Freight Reliability.
Transit Asset Management Measures
MoDOT collected and evaluated existing buses and facilities to be included in the State Transit Asset
Management Plan and used this information to set targets, which will be evaluated on an annual basis as
inventory changes. JEFFTRAN opted to create its own Transit Asset Management Plan and set its own
targets, which are identical to the state targets, as listed below.
Figure 2 – Transit Asset Management targets by MoDOT and JEFFTRAN
Assets
Performance Measure State Targets JEFFTRAN
Targets
Equipment
Non-revenue support-service
and maintenance vehicles
Percentage of vehicles
met or exceeded Useful
Life Benchmark
Not Applicable Not Applicable
Rolling Stock
Revenue vehicles by mode
Percentage of vehicles
met or exceeded Useful
Life Benchmark
50 percent 50 percent
Infrastructure (not applicable
in state plan)
Only rail fixed-guideway, track,
signals and systems
Percentage of track
segments with
performance restrictions
by class
Not Applicable Not Applicable
Facilities
Percentage of assets with
condition rating below
3.0 on FTA TERM*
Scale
25 percent with
condition rating
below 3.0 on
FTA TERM
Scale
25 percent with
condition rating
below 3.0 on FTA
TERM Scale
* TERM is a Federal Transit Administration Transit Economic Requirements Model which helps transit agencies assess their
state of good repair backlog, level of annual investment to attain state of good repair, impact of variations in funding, and
investment priorities.
JEFFTRAN has its budget, fiscally constrained projects, and Program of Projects in this document. The
agency has identified $XXXXX that may be utilized for bus replacement and other capital projects to help
JEFFTRAN move towards these targets.
Safety Measures
The Federal Highway Administration established five performance measures to assess performance and
carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program: (1) number of fatalities, (2) rate of fatalities per
vehicle mile traveled (VMT), (3) number of serious injuries, (4) rate of serious injuries per VMT, and (5)
number of combined non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries.
MoDOT established the following statewide safety targets in 2018, as seen in Figure 3, which shows the
targets set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. These targets are updated annually.
6
Figure 3 – Safety Performance Measures set by MoDOT*
Performance Measure 5-year Rolling Average
(2013-2017)
5-Year Rolling
Average Statewide
Target for CY2019
Number of Fatalities 854.4 872.3
Fatality rate per 100 Million VMT 1.176 1.160
Number of Serious Injuries 4,756.4 4433.8
Serious Injury Rate per 100 Million
VMT
6.566 6.168
Number of Non-Motorized
Fatalities and Serious Injuries
441.3 445.4
* Targets based on the State Highway Safety Plan: Missouri Blueprint -A Partnership Towards Zero Deaths, a 9% fatality
reduction, 5% serious injury reduction, 1% VMT increase and 4 % non-motorized reduction
There are a number of projects programmed for safety in the TIP, totaling $XXXXX for Program Years
2020-2024, all sponsored by the Central District of MoDOT, to help the State move towards these targets.
CAMPO staff also actively participates in the Central District Coalition of Roadway Safety, which works
to implement Missouri’s Blueprint ultimate goal of zero fatalities on Missouri roadways, and participates
in the annual Highway Safety and Traffic Blueprint Conference.
Pavement and Bridge Measures
The Federal Highway Administration established 6 performance measures to assess pavement and bridge
conditions: (1) percent of interstate pavements in Good condition, (2) percent of interstate pavements in
Poor condition, (3) percent of non-interstate national highway system (NHS) pavements in Good
condition, (4) percent of non-interstate NHS pavements in Poor condition, (5) percent of NHS bridges by
deck area classified as Good condition, and (6) percent of NHS bridges by deck area classified as Poor
condition. There are no interstate highways in the CAMPO region, so those targets are not addressed.
MoDOT established the following statewide pavement and bridge targets in 2018, as seen in Figure 4,
which shows the targets set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. These targets may be updated every
other year.
Figure 4 – Applicable Pavement and Bridge Targets set by MoDOT
Performance Measure 2017
Baseline
2019
Target
2021
Target
Percentage of NHS Bridges in Good Condition 34.0% 30.9% 30.9%
Percentage of NHS Bridges in Poor Condition 7.1% 7.1% 7.1%
Percentage of non-Interstate NHS Pavements in Good Condition 61.1% 61.1% 61.1%
Percentage of non-Interstate NHS Pavements in Poor Condition 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
7
Many projects in the TIP address Asset Management, a major priority for MoDOT. There are currently
$XXXX projects in the 2020-2024 TIP that address either work on roads or bridges to maintain or update
them which will help the state maintain these targets.
Travel Time Reliability and Freight Reliability
The Federal Highway Administration established 3 performance measures to assess travel time reliability
and assessing freight movement on the interstate system: (1) Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled
on the Interstate, (2) Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS, and (3) Truck
Travel Time Reliability Index. There are no interstate highways in the CAMPO region, so targets one and
three are not applicable to CAMPO.
MoDOT established the following travel time reliability targets in 2018, as seen in Figure 5, which shows
the targets set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. This target may be updated every other year.
Figure 5 – Applicable Travel Time Reliability Target set by MoDOT
Performance Measure 2017
Baseline
2019
Target
2021
Target
Non-Interstate Travel Time Reliability Measure: Percent of
Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS
92.3% - 87.8%
There are currently no projects programmed into the 2020-2024 TIP with the sole purpose of improving
travel time reliability. Several of the projects within the TIP address this target indirectly which will help
the state with this target.
Financial Plan
The TIP includes a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, and
indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to
carry out the TIP. CAMPO, MoDOT, and public transportation operators cooperatively develop
estimates of funds that are reasonably expected to be available to support TIP implementation. Only
projects for which construction or operating funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be
included. In developing the financial plan, CAMPO takes into account all projects and strategies funded
under Title 23 U.S.C., Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, and other federal funds, and regionally significant
projects that are not federally funded. For purposes of transportation operations and maintenance, the
financial plan shall contain system-level estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably
expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways (as defined by Title 23
U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation (as defined by Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53).
8
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding
Federal funding forecasts, provided by MoDOT based on published notices in the Federal Register,
estimate fiscal year authorization levels by the FHWA and FTA under the current highway act. Appendix
B briefly describes most of the Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO
planning area.
For Federally-funded projects, the TIP must identify the appropriate “matching funds” by source. The
matching funds are usually provided by state and local governments. State revenue forecasts are also
provided by MoDOT based on historical data of the State Fuel Tax, State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax and
General Revenue.
Local revenue forecast from the County Aid Road Trust (State Fuel Tax and State Vehicle Sales and Use
Tax) for each jurisdiction are based on past distributions and are assumed to continue a trend of a two
percent inflation rate. The City of Jefferson has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement
Program and a ½ cent sales tax for Parks and Recreation, which supports greenways and other non-
motorized transportation activities. The City of Jefferson has provided its own future revenue projections
from these sources. Cole County has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a
real property tax levy of $0.27 earmarked for Road & Bridges. All small cities get $100,000 every five
years from Cole County, which comes from the aforementioned sales tax. Callaway County has a real
property tax levy of $0.2466 earmarked for Road & Bridges.
Outlined in Figure 6 are local forecasts of revenue sources for over the life of the TIP available for
transportation projects.
9
This table will be updated as financial data is researched.
Figure 6 – Forecast Revenue for Transportation projects
In the past, local governments have used general revenue and other sources of revenue, as they deemed
appropriate to match transportation grants awarded. It is not uncommon, nor difficult, for local
jurisdictions to transfer funds from one account to another at their discretion.
Figure 7 shows the total programmed project funds and available project funds by source. The project
costs have inflation factored in by each project sponsor. The instructions on the form used to submit a
project for inclusion in the TIP reminds the project sponsor to take inflation into account when estimating
the project’s cost. Since the last iteration of the MTP, the inflation factor for the TIP has been set as two
percent.
Callaway County 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)1,771,294$ 1,806,720$ 1,842,854$ 1,879,711$ 1,917,305$ 9,217,884$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.2466 levy)1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 9,500,000$
Transfer from general revenue 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,500,000$
Cole County
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)829,043$ 845,624$ 862,536$ 879,787$ 897,383$ 4,314,372$
Sales Tax 5,440,179$ 5,440,179$ 5,440,179$ 5,440,179$ 5,440,179$ 27,200,895$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.27 levy)3,980,380$ 3,980,380$ 3,980,380$ 3,980,380$ 3,980,380$ 19,901,900$
Motor Vehicle Sales Tax 368,032$ 368,032$ 368,032$ 368,032$ 368,032$ 1,840,160$
Holts Summit
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)**151,038$ 154,059$ 157,140$ 160,283$ 163,488$ 786,008$
Transportation Sales Tax 400,000$ 406,000$ 412,000$ 418,000$ 424,000$ 2,060,000$
Sales Tax 32,500$ 33,150$ 33,800$ 34,500$ 35,190$ 169,140$
Cap Imp Street Revenue 40,170$ 41,375$ 42,616$ 43,895$ 45,212$ 213,268$
Interest 8,800$ 9,200$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 48,000$
NID Deposits 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 8,000$ 40,000$
City of Jefferson
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)1,808,889$ 1,845,067$ 1,881,968$ 1,919,607$ 1,957,999$ 9,413,530$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Parks Sales Tax 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 24,759,390$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement (Expires March 2022)1,420,000$ 1,420,000$ 1,420,000$ 1,420,000$ 1,420,000$ 7,100,000$
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
Passenger Fares & Misc. 633,697$ 646,371$ 659,298$ 672,484$ 685,934$ 3,297,785$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement (Expires March 2022)80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 400,000$
St. Martins
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)47,483$ 48,908$ 50,375$ 51,887$ 53,443$ 252,096$
General Revenue Funds 210,700$ 184,870$ 190,416$ 196,128$ 202,013$ 984,127$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement*20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Taos
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)36,867$ 37,605$ 38,357$ 39,124$ 39,906$ 191,858$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement* 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Wardsville
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)63,237$ 64,502$ 65,792$ 67,108$ 68,450$ 329,088$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement* 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
OATS
Passenger Fares, Misc.6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 30,000$
Section 5310 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 30,000$
Medicaid Transportation 36,000$ 36,000$ 36,000$ 36,000$ 36,000$ 180,000$
124,059,500$
Note: County Aid Road Trust includes State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales/Use Tax and Licensing Fees.
Please see more on CART funds here: http://dor.mo.gov/publicreports/index.php#motorfuel
* This is distributed from Cole County
Available Local Transportation Funds
Total Local Funds
CART Funds based on 2018 numbers from MoDOT. There is a conservative two (2)
percent increase per year, based on historical numbers.
** Holts Summit now receives Lake Mykee's CART funds after they merged in 2017.
10
This table will be updated and finalized once all project sponsors have submitted all projects.
Figure 7 – Programmed Funds by Source.
Operations and Maintenance
Maintenance costs include MoDOT’s salaries, materials and equipment needed to deliver the roadway
and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities like minor surface
treatments such as: sealing, small concrete repairs and pothole patching; mowing right of way; snow
removal; replacing signs; striping; repairing guardrail; and repairing traffic signals. Performing these
activities requires employees; vehicles and other machinery; and materials such as salt, asphalt and fuel.
Maintenance operations expenditures are expected to increase 1.8% annually.
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
FHWA Adv. Con.$3,065,600 $3,414,400 $13,422,400 $0 $0 $19,902,400
FHWA NHPP $9,580,800 $3,936,000 $0 $0 $0 $13,516,800
FHWA HSIP $1,018,500 $2,145,800 $2,452,500 $0 $0 $5,616,800
FHWA STBG $200 $1,290,800 $1,260,200 $0 $0 $2,551,200
FHWA TAP $306,636 $446,131 $0 $0 $0 $752,767
FHWA SHRP2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA RTP $14,149 $14,148 $0 $0 $0 $28,297
FTA 5307 $725,594 $729,222 $732,868 $736,532 $740,215 $3,664,431
FTA 5310 $40,000 $160,000 $75,000 $175,000 $75,000 $525,000
FTA 5311 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5329 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5339 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT AM $0 $0 $3,495,650 $0 $0 $3,495,650
MoDOT MPEN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT Safety $241,500 $385,200 $272,500 $0 $0 $899,200
MoDOT State Operating $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $57,075
MoDOT SWIMB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT TCOS $3,814,650 $1,981,050 $0 $0 $0 $5,795,700
MoDOT State Rail $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Jefferson City $1,184,302 $1,044,661 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $5,360,696
Cole County $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Oats $40,000 $60,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $325,000
Holts Summit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
St. Martins $34,310 $365,017 $0 $0 $0 $399,327
Other $207,764 $256,815 $200,540 $252,494 $204,468 $1,122,081
$17,219,820 $12,826,259 $9,619,584 $2,294,352 $2,150,009
$44,110,024
Programmed Funds
Federal
State
Local
Yearly Totals
Total Programmed Total
11
This makes MoDOT’s cost, $4,870 per lane mile
Calculations are $377,785,000 / 77,571 lane miles.
Assumptions:
Maintenance Operations $480,039,000 *
Fleet Investments $ 26,451,000 *
Total $506,490,000
Minus Maintenance Fringe Benefits $128,705,000
Total $377,785,000
Lane miles 77,571 **
*Source: FY 2019 Budget approved 6/6/2018
** Source: Official 2017 State System Mileage
Operations and Maintenance - Local Government
Local revenue sources for operations and maintenance include state fuel tax, state vehicles sales/use tax,
local sales taxes, franchise fees, license and permit fees, property taxes, and other revenue sources that
provide significant resources for local general fund and specific funding of transportation. Not all taxes
and fees go to transportation, so the local jurisdiction usually will identify a budget specifically for
transportation purposes, such as capital improvements, Road and Bridge funds, transit operating
subsidies, road and street budgets, or operations and maintenance budgets.
The operations and maintenance costs for local governments include salaries, fringe benefits, materials,
and equipment needed to deliver the street and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes
basic maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as sealing, small concrete repairs, pothole
patching, mowing, snow removal, replacing signs, striping, and repairing traffic signals. These activities
may be performed in-house or outsourced.
Local government operations and maintenance on federal aid roads calculated for the system wide
average of operations & maintenance per centerline mile is determined below in Figure 8. As a further
demonstration of fiscal constraint, Federal Highway Administration has requested that the municipalities
report their operations and maintenance budget. Reported below are five examples: Cole and Callaway
Counties, Jefferson City, St. Martins, and MoDOT.
12
Figure 8 – 2020 Operations and Maintenance costs for local jurisdictions
Municipality Cost per lane mile
Cole County $6,724
Callaway County $2,469
Jefferson City $5,888
St. Martins $5,434.72
MoDOT $4,870
Figure 9 shows the various roadway types in CAMPO’s MPA and the governing body that is responsible
for maintenance.
Figure 9 - Federal Aid Road Mileage by Jurisdiction.
Source: CAMPO Functional Classification GIS Database.
In addition to the local government operations and maintenance previously discussed, JEFFTRAN
expenses also cover fleet repair/maintenance, repairing/replacing bus shelters, bus washing, bus
maintenance facilities, public restrooms, and fuel. Figures 10 and 11 show the estimated expenditures for
transit operations and maintenance for JEFFTRAN and OATs, respectively.
Urban
Other
Freeway
Express
way
Urban
Other
Principal
Arterial
Urban
Minor
Arterial
Urban
Collector
Rural
Other
Principal
Arterial
Rural
Minor
Arterial
Rural
Major
Collector
Total Percent of
Total
(Jurisdiction)
Callaway County 2.3 2.9 0.9 6.1 2.89%
Cole County 3.6 5.9 4.6 14.1 6.63%
Holts Summit 3.1 4.1 0.5 7.6 3.61%
City of Jefferson*4.3 37.4 23.6 65.3 30.83%
MoDOT 34.6 8.7 18.2 11.9 5.4 5.3 32.7 116.8 55.13%
St. Martins 1.5 0.5 1.9 0.91%
Taos 0.0 0.00%
Wardsville 0.0 0.00%
Total (Functional Class)34.6 13.0 66.1 48.8 5.4 6.3 37.8 211.9 100.00%
Percent (Functional Class)16.3%6.1%31.2%23.0%2.5%3.0%17.8%
*Includes Parks & Rec.
13
Awaiting budgetary numbers from JEFFTRAN
Figure 10 - JEFFTRAN Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Operations and Maintenance revenue and expenditures are based on the most recently available budgets
Figure 11 – OATS Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Financial Constraint
To exhibit financial constraint, a financial plan should address three questions:
1) What will the needs for transportation in the CAMPO planning area cost?
The needs are identified by project in the following section and costs are summarized by funding
source in Figure 6.
2) What revenues are available that can be applied to the needs?
Specific revenues available to meet the needs are identified in Figure 6 - Forecast Revenue for
Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance, by jurisdiction and source.
3) Are the revenues sufficient to cover the costs?
As shown in Figure 7 – Programmed by Source, programmed fund amounts equal anticipated
fund amounts. For many jurisdictions as shown in Figure 6, available funds exceed the amounts
of revenues required to fund programmed projects.
Funding Type FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
FTA Section 5307 740,928$ 740,928$ 740,928$ 740,928$ 740,928$
City of Jefferson-Local Operating Assistance 1,023,442$ 1,043,911$ 1,064,789$ 1,086,085$ 1,107,807$
MoDOT State Operating Assistance 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$
Passenger fares and Misc 633,697$ 646,371$ 659,298$ 672,484$ 685,934$
Capital Funds 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$
Total 2,534,567$ 2,567,710$ 2,601,515$ 2,635,997$ 2,671,169$
Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
FTA-Section 5310 40,000$ 60,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$
Fares 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,100$ 5,100$ 5,100$
Local Contracts 40,000$ 60,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$
Total 85,000$ 125,000$ 155,100$ 155,100$ 155,100$
14
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects (Projects will be updated)
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $25,600 $105,600 $131,200
MoDOT TCOS $6,400 $26,400 $32,800
TIP #2013-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3015 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $492,800 $492,800
MoDOT TCOS $123,200 $123,200
Local $0
Other $0
Total $32,000 $748,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $780,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $89,600 $86,400 $176,000
MoDOT TCOS $22,400 $21,600 $44,000
TIP #2018-01 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3261 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $582,400 $582,400
MoDOT TCOS $145,600 $145,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $112,000 $836,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $948,000
Comments: Project involves bridges A3451,
A4265, and A4662. Award date 2020.
Bridge Projects
Total Project Cost: $780,000
Description & Location: Bridge rehabilitation and
upgrade ADA and guardrail at Dix Road over
US 50 in Jefferson City.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Involves bridge number A1187.
Award date 2019.
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30MoDOT Funding
Project
Name:Dix Road Bridge Improvements E
N
G
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Total Project Cost: $948,000
Prior
Funding
Bridge Decksealing over Route 54 E
N
G
Description & Location: Includes bridge
decksealing on Route 94 over Little Tavern
Creek in Callaway County and West Main over
Route 54/63 in Cole County
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
15
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $204,800 $144,000 $393,600 $742,400
MoDOT TCOS $51,200 $36,000 $98,400 $185,600
TIP #2019-01 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3337 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $3,542,400 $3,542,400
MoDOT TCOS $885,600 $885,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $256,000 $180,000 $4,920,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,356,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA Adv. Con.$800 $16,000 $64,000 $100,800 $181,600
MoDOT TCOS $200 $4,000 $16,000 $20,200
TIP #2019-02 MoDOT AM $25,200 $25,200
MoDOT#5P2190 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$273,600 $273,600
MoDOT AM $68,400 $68,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total $1,000 $20,000 $80,000 $468,000 $0 $0 $0 $569,000
Project
Name:
Bridge Preventative Maintenance On
US 50 Over Osage River E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge preventative
maintenance over the Osage River, 0.3 mile
west of the Route 63 junction.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridge A5552.
Anticipated federal reimbursement from NHPP.
Total Project Cost: $569,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvements On US 54 Over
Missouri River E
N
G
Description & Location:Bridge improvements for
both bridges over the Missouri River in
Jefferson City.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridges A4497 and
L0550.
Total Project Cost: $5,356,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
16
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $93,600 $494,400 $588,000
MoDOT TCOS $23,400 $123,600 $147,000
TIP #2017-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3121 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $5,070,400 $5,070,400
MoDOT TCOS $1,267,600 $1,267,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $117,000 $6,956,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,073,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $80,100 $80,100
MoDOT TCOS $8,900 $8,900
TIP #2017-12 Local $0
MoDOT#0S3021F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA STBG $1,210,500 $1,210,500
MoDOT TCOS $134,500 $134,500
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $1,434,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,434,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:US 54 Pavement Improvements E
N
G
Comments: Award Date 2020.
R
O
W
E
N
G
Description & Location: ADA Transition Plan
improvements at various locations in the
Central District
R
O
W
Prior
Funding
Roadway Projects
MoDOT
Total Project Cost: $1,434,000
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: $1.268 million statewide transportation
alternatives funds. Award Date 2021.
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
C
O
N
S
T
Enhancement Projects in Central
District
Total Project Cost: $7,073,000
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Description & Location: Pavement resurfacing and
guard cables installation on the eastbound and
westbound lanes of US 54 from Route E to near
Stadium Boulevard in Jefferson City.
Funding
Project
Name:
17
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $75,600 $75,600
MoDOT AM $8,400 $8,400
TIP #2018-05 Local $0
MoDOT#0S3022F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA STBG $1,184,400 $1,184,400
MoDOT AM $131,600 $131,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA Adv. Con.$8,000 $11,200 $192,800 $212,000
MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $2,800 $48,200 $53,000
TIP #2019-03 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3333 MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$2,585,600 $2,585,600
MoDOT TCOS $646,400 $646,400
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total $10,000 $14,000 $3,473,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,497,000
Description & Location: ADA Transition Plan
improvements at various locations in the
Central District
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement Resurfacing on US 50
Total Project Cost: $1,400,000
Total Project Cost: $3,497,000
Project
Name:
Enhancement Projects in Central
District E
N
G
E
N
G
MoDOT Funding
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:$1.2 million statewide transportation
alternatives funds. Award Date 2022.
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
Description & Location: Pavement resurfacing
east of West Truman Blvd. to east of Kaylor
Bridge Road, all lanes and from east of Route M
to east of Stoney Gap Road
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal reimbursement
from STBG.
18
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $16,000 $439,200 $455,200
MoDOT TCOS $4,000 $109,800 $113,800
TIP #2019-06 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3371 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $2,165,600 $2,165,600
MoDOT TCOS $541,400 $541,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total $20,000 $3,256,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,276,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA TAP $28,072 $28,072
MoDOT $0
TIP #2020-01 Local St. Martins $34,310 $34,310
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA TAP $446,131 $446,131
MoDOT $0
Local St. Martins $365,017 $365,017
Other $0
Total $0 $62,382 $811,148 $0 $0 $0 $0 $873,530
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: TAP grant awardee. Working with
Cole County to complete the project
Total Project Cost: $873,530
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Guard Cables Along US 54 E
N
G
Description & Location: Guard cable
improvements from Miller County to near
Stadium Blvd. in Jefferson City
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Award date Fall 2019
Total Project Cost: $3,276,000
St. Martins Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Business 50 W Bike/Ped/ADA
Improvements E
N
G
Description & Location: Addition of 8-foot wide
asphalt bike/ped lanes for 1.1 miles in each
direction along Business 50 West from Rt. T/D
to west of Carel Rd.
19
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA Adv. Con.$4,000 $36,000 $889,600 $929,600
MoDOT AM $222,400 $222,400
TIP #2020-03 MoDOT TCOS $1,000 $9,000 $10,000
MoDOT#5P3409 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$12,158,400 $12,158,400
MoDOT AM $3,039,600 $3,039,600
MoDOT $0
Other $0
Total $0 $5,000 $45,000 $16,310,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,360,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $46,000 $148,800 $194,800
MoDOT Safety $11,000 $37,200 $48,200
TIP #2020-04 Local $0
MoDOT#5I3408 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $881,600 $908,000 $1,789,600
MoDOT Safety $220,400 $227,000 $447,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $1,159,000 $1,321,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,480,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement Improvements on US 63 E
N
G
Description & Location:Pavement improvements
on US 63 from Route B to US Route 54.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal funding
category: NHPP. Award Date 2022.
Total Project Cost: $16,360,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:High Friction Surface Treatments E
N
G
Description & Location:High Friction surface
treatment at various locations in Boone,
Morgan, Washington, Cooper,Callaway, and
Cole Counties
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal funding
category: STBG. Award Date 2020.
Total Project Cost: $2,480,000
20
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $45,000 $900 $45,900
MoDOT Safety $5,000 $100 $5,100
TIP #2013-16 Local $0
MoDOT#5S2234 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $50,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $144,000 $144,000
MoDOT Safety $16,000 $16,000
TIP #2018-04 Local $0
MoDOT#0P3022F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $2,250,900 $2,250,900
MoDOT Safety $250,100 $250,100
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $2,661,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,661,000
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal funding
category: Safety.
Description & Location: Scoping for safety
improvements at the intersection of Route M
and Route W in Wardsville.
R
O
W
Other Projects
Prior
Funding
FundingMoDOT State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Scoping Routes M, B & W E
N
G
MoDOT
Total Project Cost: $51,000
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Total Project Cost: $2,661,000
Funding Prior
Funding
Project
Name:Safety Projects in Central District E
N
G
Description & Location: Safety projects at
various locations in the Central District.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: $2.289 million from Open Container
funds. Award Date 2022. 90/10 Grant/match.
21
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $400 $7,600 $8,000
TIP #2018-06 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3274 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$1,600 $30,400 $32,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $112,000 $112,000
Local $0
MoDOT TCOS (AC)$448,000 $448,000
Total $2,000 $598,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $52,200 $200 $200 $200 $52,800
MoDOT TCOS $13,050 $50 $50 $13,150
TIP #2015-07 MoDOT AM $50 $50
MoDOT#5S3081 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $65,250 $250 $250 $250 $0 $0 $0 $66,000
Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in
Northern Central District E
N
G
Project
Name:
MoDOT
Project
Name:
Description & Location: Scoping for slide
repairs in the northern portion of the Cental
District at various locations.
Total Project Cost: $66,000
Slide Repair Scoping
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Award Date Spring 2019.
Anticipated federal reimbursement from STBG.
Total Project Cost: $600,000
Description & Location: Job order contracting
for guard cables and guardrail repair on
various routes in the northern portion of the
Central District.
R
O
W
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated Federal Funding Category -
STBG. Future construction cost $2 million - 5 million.
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30Prior
Funding
Funding
Funding Prior
FundingMoDOT
R
O
W
E
N
G
22
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2018-07 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3224 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $31,500 $31,500
MoDOT Safety $3,500 $3,500
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $75,000 $30,000 $105,000
TIP #2018-08 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3179 MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total $75,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000Total Project Cost: $105,000
Comments: No federal funds used for this
project.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
Total Project Cost: $36,000
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:On-call Work Zone Enforcement E
N
G
MoDOT
C
O
N
S
T
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Surveying E
N
G
Description & Location: Surveying to sell
excess right of way parcels in the Central
District.
R
O
W
23
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $14,000 $127,400 $141,400
TIP #2018-02 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3230 FHWA Adv. Con.$56,000 $509,600 $565,600
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $2,000
Local $0
MoDOT Adv. Con.$8,000 $8,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $628,000 $628,000
Local $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$2,512,000 $2,512,000
Total $70,000 $3,787,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,857,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $1,000 $10,800 $11,800
TIP #2020-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3386 FHWA Adv. Con.$4,000 $43,200 $47,200
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $123,200 $123,200
Local $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$492,800 $492,800
Total $0 $5,000 $670,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $675,000
Description & Location: Pavement resurfacing
and adding rumble stripes from Rte. B to Rte.
50. Includes Rte. E from Rte. 54 to Rte. B.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Potential ADA improvements in
Taos. Award date 2020. Anticipated Federal
Funds: STBG.Total Project Cost: $3,857,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement improvements on Route M E
N
G
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement improvements on Route U E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement
improvements & guardrail on Rte. U, Route Y
from Route M in Taos, Rte W from Rte. B in
Wardsville, and Rte.J from 50.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $675,000
24
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $5,000 $5,000 $10,000
TIP #2018-09 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3254 MoDOT TCOS (AC)$20,000 $20,000 $40,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2019-04 Local $0
MoDOT#0X3121F Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $1,031,400 $1,031,400
MoDOT Safety $114,600 $114,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $1,146,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,146,000
C
O
N
S
T
Total Project Cost: $1,146,000
Prior
Funding
Description & Location: Curve safety
improvements at various locations in the
Central District.
R
O
W
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
FundingMoDOT
Description & Location:Scoping for ADA
improvements at various locations in Chamois,
Frankenstein, Route M in Taos, and Route W in
Wardsville.
Total Project Cost: $50,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:
Scoping for ADA Improvements in
Various Locations E
N
G
E
N
G
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated Federal Category - STBG.
Includes sidewalks, curb ramps, entrances, and signals
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
R
O
W
Curve Safety ImprovementsProject
Name:
25
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2019-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3313 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $56,700 $56,700
MoDOT Safety $6,300 $6,300
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2020-08 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3406 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $56,700 $56,700
MoDOT Safety $6,300 $6,300
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000
Project
Name:On-call Work Zone Enforcement E
N
G
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
C
O
N
S
T
R
O
W
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
Total Project Cost: $64,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:On-call Work Zone Enforcement E
N
G
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
Total Project Cost: $64,000
26
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2020-09 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3407 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $56,700 $56,700
MoDOT Safety $6,300 $6,300
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 $64,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $20,000 $200 $20,200
TIP #2019-07 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3374 MoDOT Adv. Con.$80,000 $800 $80,800
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $100,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $101,000Total Project Cost: $101,000
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Traffic Safety Studies E
N
G
Description & Location: Scoping to identify
potential improvements to safety and traffic
flow at various locations in the Central District
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated Federal Category -
STBG.
MoDOT
Total Project Cost: $64,000
MoDOT Funding
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:On-call Work Zone Enforcement E
N
G
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
27
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2020-02 Local ORTA $2,865 $2,865
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA RTP $14,149 $14,148 $28,297
Local ORTA $7,060 $7,060 $14,120
Local COJ - P&R $750 $750 $1,500
Local Private $1,250 $1,250 $2,500
Total $0 $26,074 $23,208 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,282
Pedestrian & Bicycle Projects
Description & Location: Construction of 1.3 mi
of singletrack trail, features & signage, and 0.4
mi. kid's loop trail.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Monetary donations provided by City of
Jefferson Parks and Recreation Department and
Midwest Block & Brick
Total Project Cost: $49,282
Osage Region Trail Association Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Binder Bike Park Phase 1 E
N
G
Source Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Future Totals
Other Pass. Fares $189,692 $191,589 $193,505 $195,440 $197,394 $199,368 $1,166,988
MoDOT State Operating $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $68,490
TIP #2011-04 Local $1,115,612 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $1,043,911 $6,335,167
MoDOT#FTA 5307 $721,984 $725,594 $729,222 $732,868 $736,532 $740,215 $4,386,415
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $2,038,703 $1,972,509 $1,978,053 $1,983,634 $1,989,252 $1,994,909 $0 $11,957,060
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
O
P
E
R
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $11,957,060
Project
Name:Operating Assistance
Description & Location: Operating Assistance
for JEFFTRAN service w ithin city limits of
Jefferson City (A 3% annual inflation factor
applied.)
R
O
W
Public Transportation Projects
Funding Prior
FundingCity of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
28
Figure 12 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
This map will be updated once projects are finalized.
29
Program of Projects - OATS
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA 5310 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-10 Local $0
MoDOT#Other $50,000 $50,000 $100,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FTA 5310 $30,770 $40,000 $60,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $355,770
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-11 Local $30,770 $40,000 $60,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $355,770
MoDOT#Other $4,900 $5,000 $5,000 $5,100 $5,100 $5,100 $30,200
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $66,440 $85,000 $125,000 $155,100 $155,100 $155,100 $0 $741,740Total Project Cost: $741,740
OATS
Project
Name:Operating Assistance O
P
E
R
Description & Location: Requesting
replacement/expansion vehicles to provide
service in Jefferson City and surrounding area
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Total Project Cost: $300,000
OATS
Project
Name:Capital Funding - Vehicles C
A
P
I
T
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Description & Location: Within the Jefferson
City MPO Region-Section 5310-Seniors and
Individuals w ith Disablilities
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Funding Prior
Funding
30
Figure 13 - Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN
Awaiting update from JEFFTAN
Item Description Total
Funding by
Others Local
1 Replacement of paratransit widebody cutaway buses 150,000$ $ 120,000 30,000$
2 Update phone system 10,000$ -$ 10,000$
3 Replace paratransit software package 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
4 Rehab pavement 800 block E. Miller St.100,000$ -$ 100,000$
5 Replace low-floor minivan support vehicle 40,000$ -$ 40,000$
6 Replace transit administration vehicle 30,000$ 30,000$
7 Upgrade/replace electronic fare card system 300,000$ 240,000$ 60,000$
8 Repair Transfer Facility Roof (Bus Transfer Shelter)12,000$ -$ 12,000$
9 Transit facility improvements--ridge cap/flashing replacements/roof repair on bus barn 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
10 Security camera upgrades for transit facilities 20,000$ 16,000$ 4,000$
11 Replace outdated bus security camera systems 60,000$ 48,000$ 12,000$
12 Design work for New Transit Passenger Transfer and Admin Facility 150,000$ -$ 150,000$
13 Purchase and install bus shelters at various locations in Jefferson City 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
14 Transit facility improvements--replace overhead doors and door operators for Bus Barn 95,000$ 76,000$ 19,000$
15 JEFFTRAN lighted signs for exterior of transit facilities 15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
16 Purchase emergency back-up generator & switches for transit and CM facilities 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
17 Replace current low-floor route buses with 30 ft. low floor buses for 2020 delivery (2)1,200,000$ 960,000$ 240,000$
18 Replace current low-floor route buses with 30 ft. low floor buses for 2021 delivery (3)1,800,000$ 1,440,000$ 360,000$
19 Construct new passenger transfer and administrative facility 7,000,000$ 5,600,000$ 1,400,000$
20 Transit admin facility rehab 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
21 Transit Traveler Kiosks (each)15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
22 Bike racks at passenger transfer facilities and selected bus stops 5,000$ -$ 5,000$
23 Security gates for transit storage, maintenance and fueling facilities 20,000$ 16,000$ 4,000$
24 Charging systems/electrical upgrades for buses 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
25 Add crosswalks to various locations around the city 60,000$ -$ 60,000$
JEFFTRAN Program of Projects
Illustrative Projects
31
Multimodal Projects
In 2015, CAMPO met with federal and state planning partners in a formal planning process review. Within two recommendations made, CAMPO
was urged to include more multi-modal projects into the TIP. CAMPO staff sent out written requests and reminders at CAMPO meetings for
projects, including those not using federal dollars. As of the writing of this document, no projects have been submitted.
However, there are a number of factors why these projects are limited. These types of projects are usually incorporated into new road projects.
Many of these types of projects are highly dependent on grants, which may or may not be annually awarded. Projects are usually decided each
budget year. There are several bicycle or pedestrian projects in the MTP illustrative list, but projects are not constrained and funds are not
obligated.
Regionally Significant Projects
In 2020, MoDOT has proposed a rehabilitation of the Rocheport Bridge, located along Interstate 70 over the Missouri River between Boone and
Howard Counties. During the duration of this project, travel inside the CAMPO region will be affected.
I-70, and thus Rocheport Bridge, is at the heart of national and regional distribution carrying approximately 100 million tons of freight, worth
more than $154 billion, annually. More than 20 percent of this freight is through-traffic, traveling from rural areas in the west on to New York,
New England, and the Mid-Atlantic. Rocheport Bridge is 60 years old and will only last 10 more years, even with the planned rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation of Rocheport Bridge will require closing two lanes for seven to nine months, with predicted traffic modeling of three to eight hour
backups. Rocheport Bridge carries 12.5 million vehicles per year, including 3.6 million trucks. While the surrounding area is rural, there are a
number of mid-sized cities within close proximity to the bridge – including Columbia and Jefferson City – and it connects Missouri’s two largest
cities of St. Louis and Kansas City. During traffic delays, long distance trucking would likely divert to Arkansas or Iowa to move across the U.S.,
while local traffic is expected to re-route on US Routes 40, 36, 63 and 50.
32
Appendix A – Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Amendments
TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Board
Approval
OneDOT
Approval
TIP Amendment 1
Administrative Modifications
TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Date
33
Appendix B – Federal Funding Sources
Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO planning area.
FHWA Program Eligible Activities
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/nhppfs.pd
f
The NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of
the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new
facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid
funds in highway construction are directed to support progress
toward the achievement of performance targets established in a
State's asset management plan for the NHS.
Surface Transportation Program (STP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/stbgfs.pdf
The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding
that may be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and
improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid
highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian
and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including
intercity bus terminals.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is to support a
significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all
public roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on
tribal lands
Transportation Alternatives (TA)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/transporta
tionalternativesfs.pdf
The FAST Act eliminates the MAP-21 Transportation Alternatives
Program (TAP) and replaces it with a set-aside of Surface
Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program funding for
transportation alternatives (TA). These set-aside funds include all
projects and activities that were previously eligible under TAP.
Railway-Highway Crossings (set-aside from HSIP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/railwayh
wycrossingsfst.pdf
This program funds safety improvements to reduce the number of
fatalities, injuries, and crashes at public grade crossings.
FTA Programs Eligible Activities
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/urbanized-
area-formula-grants-5307
This program provides grants to Urbanized Areas (UZA) for public
transportation capital, planning, job access and reverse commute
projects, as well as operating expenses in certain circumstances.
Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and
Individuals with Disabilities
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/enhanced-
mobility-seniors-individuals-disabilities-section-5310
This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons
with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special
needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public
transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
complementary paratransit services.
Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas
https://www.transit.dot.gov/rural-formula-grants-5311
This program provides capital, planning, and operating assistance to
states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations
less than 50,000, where many residents often rely on public transit to
reach their destinations.
Section 5329 Transit Safety & Oversight
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs
/5329_Safety_Program_Fact_Sheet.pdf
This section requires FTA to implement and maintain a national
public transportation safety program to improve the safety of all
public transportation systems that receive federal funding. The safety
program includes a national public transportation safety plan, a
safety certification training program, a public transportation agency
safety plan, and a state safety oversight program.
Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/busprogra
m
Provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses
and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities.
34
Appendix C – Policies and Procedures
Amendments
An amendment involves a major change to a project and requires approval by the Board of Directors and
Governor. An amendment is a revision that requires public review, allowance of comment, possible re-
demonstration of fiscal constraint, and includes at least one of the following:
• Addition or deletion of a project using FHWA or FTA funds (except as allowed as an administrative
modification),
• Major changes affecting project cost from FHWA or FTA sources (changes exceeding 20% of
FHWA or FTA sources of the existing project cost or changes over $2,000,000),
• Major changes in a project phase initiation date (greater than 12 months), or
• Major changes in design concept or design scope, such as changing project termini (more than 1/2
mile or 10% of the total length of the project, whichever is greater) or changing the number of
through traffic lanes that also includes a substantial increase in Federal cost.
Amendments will be initiated by the project sponsor. Amendments to delete a project can simply be
made via written correspondence identifying the project and why it is to be removed from the TIP.
Amendments to include a new project can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a
cover letter or remark in the comment section requesting inclusion in the TIP as an amendment.
Amendments for existing projects can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover
letter or remark in the comment section highlighting the change in the project and providing the CAMPO
TIP Number.
After an Amendment has been requested the process as follows:
• Staff will review the amendment for accuracy and to verify if an amendment is required or if the
change qualifies as an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if
necessary.
• The amendment will be placed on the next Technical Committee (TC) meeting agenda for review.
• The Technical Committee is an advisory board to the board of directors. Regardless of whether the
Technical Committee recommends approval of a project, does not recommend approval of a project,
or is unable to make a recommendation, the project shall still proceed to the Board of Directors to
make a final decision.
• If approval is recommended by the TC to the Board of Directors, staff will post the amendment notice
on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar day public comment period, send notices to the
appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next Board of Directors meeting agenda.
• At the Board of Directors Meeting, a public hearing will close the public comment period and a vote
for approval will be held.
If the project sponsor indicates an emergency situation upon submitting the amendment, staff will initiate
the public comment period, staff will post the amendment notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7
calendar day public comment period, send notices to the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on
the next Board of Directors meeting agenda. A public hearing will close the public comment period at the
next Board of Directors Meeting and hold a vote for approval. If this is not adequate to meet the
35
emergency situation, a special Board of Directors meeting may be called and proceed as outlined in the
Public Participation Plan.
Administrative Modifications
Revisions to the TIP and TIP projects that do not meet the criteria of an Amendment will be considered
administrative modifications including: minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to
funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation
dates. An administrative modification is a revision that neither requires committee action, public review
and comment, nor redemonstrates fiscal constraint.
An administrative modification will be initiated by the project sponsor by written communication to
CAMPO staff describing the change (phase cost, funding sources, or phase initiation date) warranting the
modification. Staff will review the administrative modification for accuracy and to verify qualification as
an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if necessary.
Upon CAMPO staff confirmation of the administrative modification requirements being met, staff will
modify the TIP appropriately, including noting the administrative modification in Appendix A of the TIP
and making changes to the project listing in the body of the TIP; notify the Board of Directors, Technical
Committee, MoDOT, FTA, and FHWA via email; draft a staff memo for the next Board of Directors and
Technical Committee meeting; and post the modified TIP notice on the CAMPO website for a minimum
of 7 calendar days.
Combining or Splitting Projects
Splitting a project into two or more projects or combining two or more projects can provide benefits to
project scheduling, cost, and logistics. A split or combination can be made via an administrative
modification to the TIP, if the project does not trigger a major change to the project as described in the
amendment section and the overall scope of work does not change.
When combining two or more projects, the financial and description information will be rolled up into the
project which was in the TIP originally and use the previous MPO TIP number. When splitting a project
into two or more projects, the financial and descriptive information will be separated appropriately into
several (two or more) projects using the same MPO TIP number, but the additional projects will include
alphabetic suffixes. The process for splitting or combining projects will follow the procedures of either
an amendment or administrative modification.
Compliance with Metropolitan Transportation Plan
For a project to be eligible for the TIP, it first must be included in the adopted MTP. Large capital
projects, roadway capacity, and/or general purpose roadway projects must be individually listed or clearly
part of a larger project included in the fiscally‐constrained component of the plan. Certain projects
seeking to improve safety, increase multi‐modal opportunities, or enhance the existing transportation
system may be programmed in the TIP without individual identification in the regional plan, so long as
they are consistent with the established goals and objectives of the plan.
36
Project Delay Policy
The goal of the Project Delay Policy for the Transportation Improvement Program is to maximize the
federal funding obligated each fiscal year and to enable the MPO to redirect funds to different projects if
any are inactive or otherwise limited from making progress. The Delay Policy applies to projects funded
through the programs for which CAMPO has oversight of project selection.
The intent of the Delay Policy is to provide an incentive for local agency sponsors to develop their
projects according to a detailed schedule and, thereby, to obligate the federal funds assigned to each
project within the timeframes initially shown in the TIP. The Delay Policy is primarily focused on
projects that involve construction or provide transportation improvements that are handled through
purchasing procedures.
In the context of this Delay Policy, a “delay” occurs when a construction-related project phase does not
get advertised within six months of the TIP program year in which its construction phase funding was
originally programmed, or changed with an amendment, in the TIP. For non-construction projects and
programs, a “delay” occurs when the “Notice to Proceed” is not issued within two months of the TIP
program year in which its implementation was originally funded in the TIP. The consequence of a delay
may be the withdrawal of its Federal funds from the TIP or other action by the Board.
Project Funding Information
When a new project is submitted for inclusion to the TIP, either during the initial development of the TIP
or as an amendment, the project sponsor is required to provide information regarding the local funding
sources in order to show fiscal constraint. The specific source of revenue, anticipated future, and any
other financial information needed to show fiscal constraint will be required.
Project Selection
The CAMPO Board of Directors adopted (Resolution 2010-04) a project prioritization and selection
process. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff and
reviewed by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of
Directors for a vote of approval. The Board of Directors may modify the project selection it deems
necessary.
Project Sponsor Commitment to Projects
Project sponsors hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring that project information contained in the TIP is
correct, that it accurately represents the scope of work being performed, and that the amount of funding
being requested is correct. The sponsor is responsible for providing CAMPO with an honest accounting
of project details including: costs, implementation schedules, and local matching fund sources, at the time
of the application for federal funds and anytime such details change. The project sponsor is also
responsible for reviewing the TIP after a project is included or modified to ensure correctness.
Scriveners’ Error
Errors made the in the ministerial functions of creating and maintaining the TIP, such as cartography,
typographical, spelling, minor word omissions, mathematical, and other error’s which do not alter the
37
intent of the TIP and have little or no impact can be performed by staff and shall not be considered a
revision to the TIP.
38
Appendix D – Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification
39
Appendix E – Definitions
Attainment area means any geographic area in which levels of a given criteria air
pollutant (e.g., ozone, carbon monoxide, PM10, PM2.5, and nitrogen dioxide)
meet the health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for
that pollutant. An area may be an attainment area for one pollutant and a
nonattainment area for others. A maintenance area (see definition below) is not
considered an attainment area for transportation planning purposes.
Available funds means funds derived from an existing source dedicated to or
historically used for transportation purposes. For Federal funds, authorized
and/or appropriated funds and the extrapolation of formula and discretionary
funds at historic rates of increase are considered available. A similar approach
may be used for State and local funds that are dedicated to or historically used
for transportation purposes.
Conformity means a Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) requirement that ensures
that Federal funding and approval are given to transportation plans, programs
and projects that are consistent with the air quality goals established by a State
Implementation Plan (SIP). Conformity, to the purpose of the SIP, means that
transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations, worsen
existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. The
transportation conformity rule (40 CFR part 93) sets forth policy, criteria, and
procedures for demonstrating and assuring conformity of transportation
activities.
Cooperation means that the parties involved in carrying out the transportation
planning and programming processes work together to achieve a common goal
or objective.
Coordination means the cooperative development of plans, programs, and
schedules among agencies and entities with legal standing and adjustment of
such plans, programs, and schedules to achieve general consistency, as
appropriate.
Design concept means the type of facility identified for a transportation
improvement project (e.g., freeway, expressway, arterial highway, grade
separated highway, toll road, reserved right-of-way rail transit, mixed-traffic rail
transit, or busway).
Design scope means the aspects that will affect the proposed facility’s impact on
the region, usually as they relate to vehicle or person carrying capacity and
control (e.g., number of lanes or tracks to be constructed or added, length of
project, signalization, safety features, access control including approximate
number and location of interchanges, or preferential treatment for high
occupancy vehicles).
Financial Plan means documentation required to be included with a metropolitan
transportation plan and TIP (and optional for the long-range statewide
transportation plan and STIP) that demonstrates the consistency between
reasonably available and projected sources of Federal, State, local, and private
revenues and the costs of implementing proposed transportation system
improvements.
Financially Constrained or Fiscal Constraint means that the metropolitan
transportation plan, TIP, and STIP includes sufficient financial information for
demonstrating that projects in the metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, and
STIP can be implemented using committed, available, or reasonably available
revenue sources, with reasonable assurance that the federally supported
transportation system is being adequately operated and maintained. For the TIP
and the STIP, financial constraint/fiscal constraint applies to each program year.
Additionally, projects in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas can be
included in the first two years of the TIP and STIP only if funds are available or
committed.
Illustrative Project means an additional transportation project that may (but is not
required to) be included in a financial plan for a metropolitan transportation
plan, TIP, or STIP if reasonable additional resources were to become available.
Maintenance Area means any geographic region of the United States that the EPA
previously designated as a nonattainment area for one or more pollutants
pursuant to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and subsequently
redesignated as an attainment area subject to the requirement to develop a
maintenance plan under section 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
Major Projects - These transportation improvements are defined as projects
receiving Federal financial assistance 1) with an estimated total cost of $500
million or more or 2) that have been identified by the FHWA as being a Major
Project. The designated projects may include those: 1) that require a substantial
amount of a State Transportation Agency's program resources, 2) that have a
high level of public or congressional attention, or 3) that have extraordinary
implications for the national transportation system.
Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) means the geographic area determined by
agreement between the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the area
and the Governor, in which the metropolitan transportation planning process is
carried out.
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) means the official multimodal
transportation plan addressing no less than a 20-year planning horizon that is
developed, adopted, and updated by CAMPO through the metropolitan
transportation planning process.
Nonattainment area means any geographic region of the United States that has
been designated by the EPA as a nonattainment area under section 107 of the
Clean Air Act for any pollutants for which an NAAQS exists.
Obligated projects means strategies and projects funded under title 23 U.S.C. and
title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for which the supporting Federal funds were
authorized and committed by the State or designated recipient in the preceding
program year, and authorized by the FHWA or awarded as a grant by the FTA.
Program of Projects (POP) is a list of projects to be funded in a grant application
submitted to FTA by a designated recipient. The POP lists the subrecipients and
indicates whether they are private non-profit agencies, governmental authorities,
or private providers of transportation service, designates the areas served
(including rural areas), and identifies any tribal entities. In addition, the POP
includes a brief description of the projects, total project cost, and Federal share
for each project.
Project selection means the procedures followed by MPOs, States, and public
transportation operators to advance projects from the first four years of an
approved TIP and/or STIP to implementation, in accordance with agreed upon
procedures.
Project sponsor must be a city, county, state, or other transportation related
government agency eligible to receive federal funding from the Federal
Highway or Federal Transit Administrations. All other entities must partner
with a city, county, or state agency to apply for and/or administer a
transportation project.
Public transportation operator means the public entity which participates in the
continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in
accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135 and 49 U.S.C. 5303 and 5304, and is the
designated recipient of Federal funds under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for
transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and continuing general or
special transportation to the public, but does not include school bus, charter, or
intercity bus transportation or intercity passenger rail transportation provided by
Amtrak.
Regionally significant project means a transportation project (other than projects
that may be grouped in the TIP and/or STIP or exempt projects as defined in
EPA’s transportation conformity regulation (40 CFR part 93)) that is on a
facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from
the area outside the region; major activity centers in the region; major planned
developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, or employment
centers; or transportation terminals) and would normally be included in the
modeling of the metropolitan area’s transportation network. At a minimum, this
includes all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities
that offer a significant alternative to regional highway travel.
Statewide transportation improvement program (STIP) means a statewide
prioritized listing/program of transportation projects covering a period of four
years that is consistent with the long-range statewide transportation plan,
metropolitan transportation plans, and TIPs, and required for projects to be
eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a document prepared by a
metropolitan planning organization that lists projects to be funded with
FHWA/FTA funds for the at least next one- to three-year period.
Unified Planning Work Plan (UPWP) is the management plan for the
(metropolitan) planning program. Its purpose is to coordinate the planning
activities of all participants in the planning process.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634 -6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
FY2020 Unified Planning Work Program
April 4, 2019
Summary
Staff has begun work on the FY2020 UPWP. This annual process starts very early due to the City of
Jefferson’s budget process. The FY2020 UPWP is anticipated to be adopted by May 2019.
The UPWP is CAMPO’s annual statement of work identifying the budget, planning priorities, and activities to
be carried out for the year (November 1to October 31). The UPWP contains many ongoing activities required
to perform the essential functions of CAMPO, as well as, periodic and one-time activities.
Changes to the draft UPWP since the March version include:
Updated “Major Task” – Language was added stating that staff would start the process of updating the
Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan in late 2020. The plan will be
completed in FY2021.
The budget for FY2020 is approximately $179,580, but may change by a minor amount as the UPWP is
reviewed by the Technical Committee, Board of Directors, CAMPO Staff, and the public.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approving and forwarding the Draft FY2020 Unified Planning Work Program to the Board
of Directors for review and approval.
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to forward the Draft FY2020 Unified Planning Work Program to the Board of Directors for review and
approval.
Agenda Item 6B
Unified
Planning
Work
Program
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and
Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and
conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration,
or the Missouri Department of Transportation.
FY 2020
November 1, 2019 to October 31, 2020
Adopted May 15, 2019
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone: (573) 634-6410
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
DRAFT
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 1
UPWP Development ......................................................................................................................................... 2
UPWP Modification and Amendment Process ............................................................................................. 2
Public Participation ........................................................................................................................................... 2
Major Tasks Completed in FY 2019 ............................................................................................................. 2
Tasks Carried Over from FY 2019 ............................................................................................................... 3
Financial Support for CAMPO ....................................................................................................................... 3
Transportation Planning Factors ..................................................................................................................... 4
Work Element 1 - Program Support & Administration .............................................................................. 5
Work Element 2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination ...................... 6
Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning ........................................................................... 7
Work Element 4 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming............................................. 7
Work Element 5 - Public Transportation Planning ...................................................................................... 9
Appendix A – Financial Summary ............................................................................................................... 10
Anticipated Expenditures & Revenue ...................................................................................................................... 10
Table 1: FY2020 CAMPO Budget* ...................................................................................................................................... 10
Table 2: FY2020 Work Element Funding Summary - Consolidated Planning Grant and Local Funds .................. 11
Table 3: FY 2020 Local Match by Jurisdiction ................................................................................................................... 11
Table 4: Anticipated Consolidated Planning Grant Balance .......................................................................................... 11
Appendix B – CAMPO Boundary Map ...................................................................................................... 12
Appendix C - Modifications and Amendments ......................................................................................... 13
Insert Adoption Resolution
Insert Planning Process Certification
Insert Certification of Restrictions on Lobbying
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Board of Directors
Chairman – Ron Fitzwater, City Council Member, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman – Jeff Hoelscher, Eastern District Commissioner, Cole County
City of Jefferson
Jon Hensley, City Council Member
David Kemna, City Council Member
Rick Mihalevich, City Council Member
Matt Morasch, PE, Director, Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning & Protective
Services
Cole County
Larry Benz, PE, Director, Public Works
Doug Reece, City Administrator, St. Martins
Callaway County
Roger Fischer, Western District Commissioner
Holts Summit
Hanna Lechner, Interim City Administrator, Holts Summit
Missouri Department of Transportation
David Silvester, PE, District Engineer
Ex-Officio Members
Randall Allen, Jefferson City Area Chamber of Commerce
Cathy Brown, Office of Administration, Facilities
Management, Design and Construction
Marty Wilson, Callaway County Economic Development
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri
Division
Michael Henderson, AICP, Missouri Department of
Transportation, Transportation Planning
Joan Roeseler, Missouri Department of Transportation,
Transit Section
Daniel Nguyen, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Technical Committee
Chairman – Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning and Protective Services, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman – David Bange, PE, Engineering Supervisor, Dept. of Public Works, City of Jefferson
City of Jefferson
Todd Spalding, Director, Parks, Recreation & Forestry
Matt Morasch, PE, Director of Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Eric Barron, AICP, Planning Manager
Britt Smith, PE, Operations & Maintenance
Cole County
Larry Benz, PE, Director of Public Works
Eric Landwehr, PE, County Engineer
Callaway County
Paul Winkelmann, PE, County Highway Administrator
Small City Representative - Callaway
Mark Tate, Streets Department, City of Holts Summit
Small City Representative - Cole
Paul Stonner/Brian Schrimpf, Wardsville
Missouri Department of Transportation
Steve Engelbrecht, PE, District Planning Manager
Michael Henderson, AICP, Transportation Planning
Specialist
Bob Lynch, PE, Area Engineer
Private Transportation Interest
Joe Scheppers, N.H. Scheppers Distributing Company.
Pedestrian or Biking Interest
Cary Maloney
Ex-Officio Members:
Daniel Nguyen, Federal Transit Administration,
Region VII
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration: Missouri
Division
CAMPO Staff and FTE (Full-Time Employee) apportionment
Sonny Sanders, AICP, GISP, PTP – Director, Planning & Protective Services FTE - 0
Eric Barron, AICP - Planning Manager FTE - 0.3
Katrina Williams, GISP, AICP –Planner II FTE - 1
Alex Rotenberry, AICP – Planner I FTE - 1
Beth Sweeten – Administrative Assistant FTE - .015
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 1
Introduction
The Fiscal Year 2020 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) defines tasks and anticipates
funding requirements for the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO).
CAMPO is responsible for transportation planning in a continuing, cooperative and
comprehensive manner. CAMPO Staff, unless otherwise identified, performs all work. The UPWP
defines activities for all public officials and agencies that contribute resources to the
transportation planning process. The UPWP covers one fiscal year, November 1 to October 31
of each year, and outlines activities funded through the Consolidated Planning Grant and local
funds. The UPWP also serves as a management tool for scheduling, budgeting, and monitoring
the local planning activities. The UPWP serves as the basis for funding agreements with the
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT).
CAMPO is the designated metropolitan planning
organization for the Jefferson City urbanized area. The
CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) boundary was
delineated by the CAMPO Board of Directors and approved
by the Governor in 2013 (see Appendix B). The MPA includes
the jurisdictions of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins,
Taos, Wardsville, and portions of unincorporated, non-
urbanized areas within Cole and Callaway Counties.
The CAMPO Board of Directors is composed of elected and
appointed officials from local jurisdictions, selected state
agencies, and Federal transportation representatives serving
as ex-officio members; and a Technical Committee that
consists of representatives from member agencies’
professional staffs and acts in an advisory capacity. A
memorandum of understanding between members identifies
the City of Jefferson as the administrator of CAMPO, and as
such, provides staffing for CAMPO. For FY2020, the City of
Jefferson will provide staff consisting of two full time
transportation planners and part time support from the
Director of Planning and Protective Services, a Planning
Manager, and an Administrative Assistant.
Priorities for FY2020
• Implementation of the goals and strategies outlined in
the Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
• Develop a Major Thoroughfare Plan.
• Provide technical assistance in mapping, data
development, and landuse planning to local jurisdictions.
• Implementation of the Capital Area Pedestrian and
Bicycle Plan and Coordinated Public Transit – Human
Services Transportation Plan.
• Federally required plan updates:
o Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services
Transportation Plan
o Title VI, LEP, PPP
• Continue implementation of FAST Act performance
measures and targets.
Challenges
Transportation agencies are
challenged in finding sufficient
and reliable sources of funding
for operations, maintenance, and
improving efficiency and
accessibility. More fuel efficient
cars and fewer vehicle miles
travelled, combined with the
federal fuel tax not being raised
since 1997, has caused the
Federal Highway Trust Fund to
become insolvent and require
support from general revenue
fund infusions to cover shortfalls.
Similar challenges are occurring
at the state level. According to
a 2019 American Petroleum
Institute report, Missouri has the
49th lowest state gas tax, at
$0.1735 per gallon in the nation.
According to the Missouri Public
Transit Association, Missouri
ranks 44th nationally in public
transportation funding, with 9
cents per capita being spent to
fund public transportation.
A challenge in the CAMPO
region is the ability to provide
transportation alternatives to
private vehicle ownership. Many
low-income individuals and/or
individuals with disabilities are
not able to drive private vehicles
and rely instead on public
transportation, walking, or biking
as their primary mode of
transportation.
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 2
UPWP Development
This UPWP is developed following the guidelines found in Chapter II Metropolitan
Transportation Planning, Appendix A, and Appendix B of FTA C 8100.1C, 9/1/2008. CAMPO staff
reviewed previous years’ time required for activities to determine time allocations for this
UPWP. Because the MPO is administered by the City of Jefferson, CAMPO accommodates the
city’s budgeting process/schedule and execution of the Consolidated Planning Grant agreement
and must begin the development of the UPWP several months prior to the fiscal year for which
the UPWP covers. CAMPO presents a draft UPWP to the Board of Directors a few months prior
to the beginning of the fiscal year. This early start presents difficulties in assuming future tasks
which may surface after adoption of the UPWP and in documenting activities occurring in the
previous year.
UPWP Modification and Amendment Process
Modification: Change in the “scope of work” which allows for changes in work tasks, or
Amendment: Also allows for a change in tasks. Amendment is necessary if a budget increase
is needed which impacts the funding reimbursement agreed upon between the Missouri
Highway and Transportation Commission and the City of Jefferson. Amendments must be
approved by the Board of Directors, FTA, and FHWA. Some modifications may also go through
an official approval by the Board of Directors as deemed appropriate by staff.
Modifications and Amendments are documented in Appendix C.
Public Participation
Federal law requires CAMPO to develop a public involvement program to involve the
community early and continuously in the transportation planning process. A proactive public
program which provides information, timely public notice, and public access to key decisions is
included in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan. During the development of the 2020 UPWP,
the document is scheduled to be discussed at monthly Board of Directors and Technical
Committee meetings from February to May, and concludes with a public comment period. Draft
copies of the UPWP as part of the meeting agendas and meeting minutes regarding UPWP
development are available to view on the CAMPO website. In accordance with the CAMPO Title
VI Policy, any and all documents produced by CAMPO, may be requested in other formats by
contacting CAMPO staff at City Hall or by calling (573)634-6536.
Major Tasks Completed in FY 2019
There were a number of projects completed by staff, consultants, or both during FY 2019.
• Staff completed the annual update of the Unified Planning Work Program and the
Transportation Improvement Program.
• Incorporation of FAST Act Performance Measures into the MTP and TIP. These performance
measures include targets for safety, transit, travel time and freight reliability, and pavement
and bridge improvements.
• A full update and adoption of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), otherwise known
as the Long Range Transportation Plan, including use of a consultant to update of the
Travel-Demand Model. Staff used Scenario Planning software to assist in the update. Staff
also engaged in a large amount of public outreach during this process.
• Staff created new re-formatted route guides for JEFFTRAN.
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 3
Tasks Carried Over from FY 2019
Staff began the process of updating the Title VI Plan, Limited English Proficiency Plan, and the
Public Participation Plan. All of these plans are interrelated and will be completed in early 2020.
Financial Support for CAMPO
CAMPO receives most of its funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5303 funds through the Missouri Department of
Transportation (MoDOT). Funding is provided through the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG)
consisting of 80% federal funding and 20% local funding.
The 20% in local matching funds is provided by the City of Jefferson and Cole County. Of the
20% local funding, Jefferson City contributes 75% and Cole County contributes 25%.
The total CAMPO budget for FY 2020 is $179,580.
Appendix A provides more detailed breakdown of financial details.
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 4
Transportation Planning Factors
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), passed into law in 2015, identifies
ten planning factors required for consideration in any MPO planning activities, including in the
development of the UPWP, MTP, and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Figure 1
provides an overview of those planning factors and how they are addressed by each work
element in the UPWP. A detailed overview of each work element can be found in the following
pages.
Figure 1: Planning Factors as addressed by work elements
Planning Factor
Work Program Element
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
1
- Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Su
p
p
o
r
t
&
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
2
- Ge
n
e
r
a
l
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
3
- Lo
n
g
Ra
n
g
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
4
- Sh
o
r
t
Ra
n
g
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
&
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
i
n
g
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
5
- Pu
b
l
i
c
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan
area, especially by enabling global competitiveness,
productivity, and efficiency.
B. Increase the safety of the transportation system for
motorized and nonmotorized users.
C. Increase the security of the transportation system for
motorized and nonmotorized users.
D. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people
and for freight.
E. Protect and enhance the environment, promote
energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and
promote consistency between transportation
improvements and State and local planned growth and
economic development patterns.
F. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the
transportation system, across and between modes, for
people and freight.
G. Promote efficient system management and
operation.
H. Emphasize the preservation of the existing
transportation system.
I. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the
transportation system and reduce or mitigate
stormwater impacts of surface transportation.
J. Enhance travel and tourism.
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 5
Work Element 1 - Program Support & Administration
This task covers the activities necessary to carry out the daily activities of CAMPO in support of
the transportation planning process. These include meeting preparation, UPWP development,
public outreach activities, reporting, and professional development activities.
Accomplishments during FY2019
Board of Directors and Technical Committee monthly meetings were held, with a few
cancellations in FY 2019. The UPWP, quarterly progress reports, Annual Listing of Obligated
Projects, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Commitments Semi-Annual reports, and
other required reporting documents were produced in a timely manner. Staff participated in
various professional development activities, including MoDOT sponsored events, webinars, and
other training opportunities.
Objectives / Activities
• Manage CAMPO activities in order to comply with Federal and State administrative
requirements and guidance. Support the operations of the Board of Directors and Technical
Committee, communicate and coordinate with Federal and State agencies on MPO activities,
and support day-to-day operations.
• Develop the annual budget and Unified Planning Work Program along with the preparation
and submittal of UPWP quarterly progress reports, billings, and invoices. Modify UPWP as
needed with approval from the necessary authority.
• Facilitate public participation such as public meetings, hearings and workshops, as needed
and in accordance with the Public Participation Plan. Provide access to CAMPO activities
through maintenance and updating of the CAMPO website.
• Fulfill reporting requirements related to Title VI, Disadvantage Business Enterprise
requirements, project obligation, and other topics as required.
• Professional Development activities, including attendance at relevant training sessions,
educational seminars, meetings, and conferences.
Products for FY 2020
• Board of Directors and Technical Committee meetings.
• Meeting agendas, minutes, presentations, reports, and other support material.
• FY 2021 UPWP.
• End of year report, quarterly progress reports, billings, and invoices.
• Annual List of Obligated Projects from the previous program year.
• DBE Commitments Semi-Annual reports.
• Participation in professional development activities.
Responsible Party
CAMPO staff.
Funding
Local Match Funds $4,669 (20%)
Federal CPG Funds $18,676 (80%)
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 6
Work Element 2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning
Coordination
Not all of the CAMPO member organizations have planning staff or current comprehensive
planning documents in place. In order to facilitate transportation planning by incorporating the
vision and goals for the member organizations and the public, CAMPO will provide assistance in
the crafting of the transportation component of local comprehensive planning documents, as
practical. This task may include the development and maintenance of related spatial and non-
spatial data collection and analysis; examples include land use, demographic data, housing,
human services, environmental/natural resources, recreation/open space, and public facilities.
Accomplishments during FY2019
Staff provided technical assistance in various grant application processes for transportation
related projects with in the CAMPO area. CAMPO staff also provided pro bono publico services
such as: participation in the development of local comprehensive plans of member
organizations, provided geospatial analysis/data (elevations, demographic, sidewalk, bicycle
facilities, street right-of-way, etc.) to support development, and grant application activities. As
part of the development of the 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, staff used Scenario
Planning software to assist in the process of developing a new Vision and Goals as part of the
planning process.
Objectives / Activities
• Provide technical planning assistance to CAMPO members in the development of the
transportation component of comprehensive and other planning documents, including
geospatial analytical support, local ordinances, and databases.
• Assist jurisdictions in the acquisition and use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and
other data for use in plans, transportation grant applications, measuring performance, and
forecasting provided by the US Census, MoDOT and others.
Products for FY 2020
• Various inputs for comprehensive planning documents - ongoing for multiple years.
• Various GIS databases.
• Continue providing technical assistance for the transportation component of local planning
documents.
• Assist member jurisdictions with development of local ordinances that may facilitate corridor
preservation and improve efficient network connectivity.
Responsible Party
CAMPO staff and local jurisdictions. Local jurisdictions have ultimate responsibility for the
development and publishing of their planning documents.
Funding
Local Match Funds $8,979 (20%)
Federal CPG Funds $35,916 (80%)
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 7
Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning
This work provides for long-range transportation planning activities, studies, and plans
supporting the transportation planning process out to a minimum of 20 years, for the CAMPO
metropolitan planning area, and may include both system level planning activities and project
level activities.
Accomplishments during FY2019
Staff conducted public participation activities involving key stakeholder, business community,
advocacy groups, environmental organizations, and the public in long range transportation
planning activities to achieve the community's long-term transportation goals and vision for the
Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Staff commenced the travel demand model project. Staff
and a consultant concluded visioning and updating the travel demand model and list of
recommended improvements. Staff, working with MoDOT, continued setting federal
performance measures for the TIP and MTP. Staff completed the update of the Metropolitan
Transportation Plan, including project prioritization, visioning, and updating the travel demand
model.
Objectives / Activities
• Keep the MTP current by maintaining and amending components of the plan such as major
land use changes, major road changes, process improvements, funding, or new regulations
and legislation; and any projects to be included into the TIP that are not already listed in the
MTP.
• Involve key stakeholders, business community and advocacy groups, environmental
organizations, and the public in long range transportation planning activities to achieve the
long-term transportation goals and vision of the MTP.
• Report MPO performance targets in relation to performance measures for the MTP and TIP.
• Continue the update process of visioning, as well as the Travel Demand Model and
subsequent transportation study to identify areas with a low level of service and provide
recommended improvements to these areas.
• Implement the recommendations and strategies as identified in the MTP.
Products for FY 2020
• Implementation of the MTP strategies and improvements
• Assist member jurisdictions in implementing recommended improvements outlined in the MTP.
• Develop a Thoroughfare Plan.
• Amendments to the MTP as necessary.
• Report MTP and TIP performance measures and targets.
Responsible Party
CAMPO staff.
Funding
Local Match Funds $12,571 (20%)
Federal CPG Funds $50,282 (80%)
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 8
Work Element 4 - Short Range Transportation Planning &
Programming
To identify and address immediate or short term transportation needs which may include non-
motorized planning activities, freight planning, bicycle/pedestrian planning, safety planning,
operations and management planning, transportation security planning, or wayfinding activities.
Accomplishments during FY2019
In FY2019 staff participated in activities, meetings and conferences including Missouri Coalition
for Roadway Safety – Central Region and STIP project review/discussions. Completed Program
Year 2020 – 2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Provided assistance to member
jurisdictions in the completion of grant applications. Participated in local committee meetings
centered around transportation access and mobility including Healthy Schools Healthy
Communities and the Transportation and Employment Re-Entry Committee in coordination with
the Missouri Department of Probation and Parole.
Objectives / Activities
• Provide support for short-range transportation planning by CAMPO and its members.
• Participate in regional activities regarding freight, safety, security, bicycle/pedestrian, non-
motorized, and other related planning activities.
• Implement the goals and strategies outlined in adopted CAMPO plans:
o Metropolitan Transportation Plan
o Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
o Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan
• Maintain the current TIP through the Amendment and Administrative Modifications process
that meets statutory requirements, maintain fiscal constraint, and support changing sponsor
priorities and project scope.
• Develop a mechanism for analysis of safety data to be used in the implementation of
recommended improvements and strategies as outlined in the MTP.
• Be a resource for local jurisdictions seeking to develop an ADA Transition Plan or seeking to
improve mobility and access.
• Develop the new Program Year TIP.
Products for FY 2020
• TIP amendments and administrative modifications as necessary
• Program Year 2021-2025 TIP.
• Develop Safety Data Report.
• Develop guidance or provide assistance in the transportation component of ADA Transition
Plan development
Responsible Party
CAMPO staff.
Funding
Local Match Funds $3,592 (20%)
Federal CPG Funds $14,366 (80%)
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 9
Work Element 5 - Public Transportation Planning
To assist public transportation and transit providers in fulfilling State, Local, and Federal
requirements for coordination and cooperative transportation planning through assistance with
plan development, technical assistance, mapping, data, and GIS functions.
Accomplishments during FY2019
In FY2019 staff provided assistance to JEFFTRAN in the creation of new route guides after the
implementation of new bus routes in December 2018.
Staff also participated in a Transportation and Employment Committee sponsored by the
Missouri Department of Corrections, Division of Probation and Parole.
Objectives / Activities
• Continue to assist JEFFTRAN with the maintaining the Route and Schedule Guide, individual
route maps and other tools to serve JEFFTRAN patrons.
• Provide JEFFTRAN mapping, demographic, GIS, planning and other technical assistance in
support of reporting requirements and evaluating possible changes in types of transit
services offered.
• Participate in transit and mobility management planning activities that support the goals
and objectives laid out in the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation
Plan.
• Continue collaboration with other regional transit providers to improve efficiency and access
in Mid-Missouri.
• Maintain the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
Products for FY 2020
• Update route and schedule guide as needed.
• Maps, demographics, GIS analytics.
• Improved service to patrons of JEFFTRAN.
• Collaboration with regional transit providers and human service agencies to meet shared
goals.
• Begin update of the Coordinated Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan.
Responsible Party
CAMPO staff.
Funding
Local Match Funds $6,106 (20%)
Federal CPG Funds $24,423 (80%)
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 10
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Anticipated Expenditures & Revenue
Table 1: FY2020 CAMPO Budget*
*Rounded to the nearest whole number.
** The City of Jefferson covers all the Utility and Capital Purchases expenses, except for some specific software licenses used for
publishing or mapping.
CAMPO receives funding from the FHWA and FTA 5303 funds through the Consolidated
Planning Grant (CPG) administered by MoDOT. Funding consists of 80% federal and 20% local
matching funds; Jefferson City contributes 75% and Cole County contributes 25%.
Federal - CPG (80%)Local (20%)Total (100%)
Advertising $1,440 $360 $1,800
Postage $160 $40 $200
Printing $100 $25 $125
Copies $8 $2 $10
Office Supplies $800 $200 $1,000
Food $200 $50 $250
Operational Supplies $1,296 $324 $1,620
Subtotal $4,004 $1,001 $5,005
Dues & Publications $1,200 $300 $1,500
Training/Education $4,800 $1,200 $6,000
Subtotal $6,000 $1,500 $7,500
Vehicle Wash $0 $0 $0
Maintenance Agreement $379 $95 $474
Subtotal $379 $95 $474
Equipment/software $1,120 $280 $1,400
Subtotal $1,120 $280 $1,400
Total Direct Costs $11,503 $2,876 $14,379
Salaries plus benefits $132,160 $33,040 $165,201
Total Labor Costs $132,160 $33,040 $165,201
Total MPO Budget $143,664 $35,916 $179,580
Labor Costs
Direct Costs
Materials & Supplies
Other Contracted Services
Equipment Repair and Maintenance
Capital Purchases and Utilities**
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 11
Table 2: FY2020 Work Element Funding Summary - Consolidated Planning Grant and Local Funds
* Numbers are rounded to the nearest whole number. Staff salaries are based on an hourly rate (base + fringe). Staff
time allocations are subject to change as planning activities fluctuate.
Table 3: FY2020 Local Match by Jurisdiction
Table 4: Anticipated Consolidated Planning Grant Balance
*The final amount of the FY 2019 CPG Allocation will not be release by MoDOT until May of 2019. This
UPWP will have been adopted before this information is made available. Additionally, the MoDOT
FY2020 SPR Work Program is also not available until the summer of 2019. The above amount is a
projection based on a 2% increase from the previous year. CAMPO staff will make modifications to totals
in Table 4 after these allocation amounts are made available.
CAMPO does not program all of the available CPG balance in order to provide flexibility
if and when a large planning effort may require added staff or consultant services.
Some years may require more funds than others in meeting MPO planning needs and
requirements.
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
(
.
3
0
F
T
E
)
Pl
a
n
n
e
r
I
I
(
1
F
T
E
)
Pl
a
n
n
e
r
I
(
1
F
T
E
)
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
(
.
0
1
5
F
T
E
)
Sub-Total
1. Program Support & Administration $23,433 $728 $24,161 $19,328 $4,832 13%
2. General Development and Comp. Planning $9,202 $7,895 $17,097 $13,678 $3,419 10%
3. Long Range Transportation Planning $4,260 $36,810 $23,685 $64,755 $51,804 $12,951 36%
4. Short Range Transportation Planning $9,202 $15,790 $24,992 $19,994 $4,998 14%
5. Public Transportation Planning $18,405 $15,790 $34,195 $27,356 $6,839 19%
Subtotal $27,693 $73,620 $63,160 $728 $165,201 $132,160 $33,040 $165,201
Direct Costs $11,503 $2,876 $14,379 8%
Total*$143,664 $35,916 $179,580 100%
Staff Time Allocations
Work Element
Total
Federal
CPG Funds
80%
Total
Local
Match
20%Total
Percent of
Work
Program
Budget
Jurisdiction CPG Local Match
City of Jefferson Share (75%)$26,937
Cole County Share (25%)$8,979
Total 2019 UPWP Local Match $35,916
CPG Balance for end of FY2018 $385,907
FY 2019 CPG Allocation - Estimated $154,723
FY 2019 CPG Expenditure - Anticipated* -($140,942)
Subtotal $399,688
$0
FY 2020 CPG Allocation - Estimated per MoDOT's SPR Work Program $157,394
FY 2020 CPG Programmed Expenditure -($143,664)
Remaining Unprogrammed CPG Funds Anticipated at end of FY 2020 $413,418
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 12
Appendix B – CAMPO Boundary Map
The CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) Boundary was approved by the CAMPO
Board of Directors January 16, 2013 and was approved by the Governor of Missouri
March 12, 2013. The MPA includes the jurisdictions of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St.
Martins, Taos, Wardsville, and portions of unincorporated, non-urbanized areas within
Cole and Callaway Counties.
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2020 UPWP – DRAFT 13
Appendix C - Modifications and Amendments
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow
three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
CAMPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Development
April 4, 2019
Summary
CAMPO continues the update of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). A draft of
the MTP is included with this memo and can be found on the project website at www.campo2045.com. This memo
stands as an update on a few specific activities being undertaken by staff and consultants as part of the update process:
Public Outreach
Two public meetings have been held (October 2018 and March 2019) as part of the MTP update process. The March
meeting was well attended with 20 attendees. An October 2018 public survey resulted in 92 responses and a report on
the survey results was given at to the Technical Committee and Board of Directors. A full report of the survey results
and other materials and documents relating to the planning process can be found at www.campo2045.com. Comments
continue to be accepted as part of the update process.
Scenarios and Travel Demand Model Development
Staff has completed and submitted four land-use development scenarios to the consultants to be used in the
development of the Travel Demand Model (TDM). After a March 19 public meeting a preferred scenario was chosen
and a list of recommended improvements was developed by the consultants. Once the Travel Demand Model is fully
completed staff will review the findings with the Technical Committee and Board of Directors. A list of recommended
future roadways will be identified at that time.
Illustrative Project Prioritization
A work group meeting was held March 26th to review and prioritize projects to be included in the 2045 MTP
Illustrative List. This list includes projects that have been identified as needs in the region that, given funding, may be
completed in the next 10 to 20 years. Projects stem from either public or stakeholder comments or were identified by
the travel demand model. The list outcome of the March meeting is highlighted in another staff report included with
this April 4th meeting packet.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that technical committee members review and provide comments on the draft MTP document. A
more complete draft will be provided at the May Technical Committee meeting and staff will request the Technical
Committee to forward it on the Board of Directors at that time.
Agenda Item 6C
Metropolitan Transportation Plan
The Long Range Transportation Plan for the
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Adopted June 19, 2019
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department
of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those
of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of
Transportation.
Acknowledgement:
A large number of people took the time and effort to attend public meetings, respond to questions and
surveys, and attend working meetings. Without the dedication of local stakeholders, the CAMPO Board of
Directors, the CAMPO Technical Committee, and the residents of the CAMPO Region this plan would not be
possible.
CAMPO staff wishes to thank those who participated in the development of the plan.
Plan Produced by:
Sonny Sanders, AICP, PTP, GISP
Eric Barron, AICP
Katrina Williams, AICP, GISP
Alex Rotenberry, AICP
Anne Stratman
MPO Administration is provided by the City of Jefferson, Missouri
Department of Planning and Protective Services/ Planning Division
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty Jefferson City, Missouri
Telephone 573-634-6410
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/government/long_range_transportation_plan/
Resolution
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Board of Directors
Chairman – Ron Fitzwater, City Council Member, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman –Jeff Hoelscher, Eastern District Commissioner, Cole County
City of Jefferson
Jon Hensley, City Council Member
David Kemna, City Council Member
Rick Mihalevich, City Council Member
Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning & Protective Services
Matt Morasch, PE, Director, Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Cole County
Larry Benz, PE, Director, Public Works
Doug Reece, City Administrator, St. Martins
Callaway County
Roger Fischer, Western District Commissioner
Holts Summit
Hanna Lechner, City Administrator, City of Holts Summit
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT)
David Silvester, PE, District Engineer
Ex-Officio Members
Randall Allen, Jefferson City Area Chamber of Commerce
Daniel Nguyen, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Joan Roeseler, MoDOT, Transit Section
Cathy Brown, Office of Administration, Facilities Management
Michael Henderson, AICP, MoDOT, Transportation Planning
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri
Marty Wilson, Callaway County Economic Development
Technical Committee
Chairman – Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning and Protective Services, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman – David Bange, PE, Engineering Supervisor, Department of Public Works, City of Jefferson
City of Jefferson
Todd Spalding, Director, Parks, Recreation & Forestry
Matt Morasch, PE, Director of Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Eric Barron, AICP, Transportation Planner
Britt Smith, PE, Operations & Maintenance
Cole County
Larry Benz, PE, Director of Public Works
Eric Landwehr, PE, County Engineer
Callaway County
Paul Winkelmann, PE, County Highway Administrator
Small City Representative - Callaway
Mark Tate, Streets Department, City of Holts Summit
Small City Representative - Cole
Paul Stonner/Brian Schrimpf, Alderman, Wardsville
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT)
Steve Engelbrecht, PE, District Planning Manager
Michael Henderson, AICP, Transportation Planning Specialist
Bob Lynch, PE, Area Engineer
Private Transportation Interest
Joe Scheppers, N.H. Scheppers Distributing Company.
Pedestrian or Biking Interest
Cary Maloney
Ex-Officio Members:
Daniel Nguyen, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri
CAMPO Staff
Sonny Sanders, AICP, GISP – Director, Planning & Protective Services
Eric Barron, AICP - Planning Manager
Katrina Williams, GISP, AICP – Transportation Planner
Alex Rotenberry, AICP - Transportation Planner
Beth Sweeten – Administrative Assistant
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................. i
............................................................................................................................................................................ 1
1 Introduction & Federal Compliance ............................................................................................................. 1
What Is Campo? ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Federal Compliance ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Performance-Based Planning And Programing ...................................................................................................................... 5
MoDOT’s Long-Range Transportation Plan ............................................................................................................................. 7
2 Planning Factors .......................................................................................................................................... 8
Economic Vitality ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Safety & Security ......................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Accessibility, Mobility, & Connectivity .................................................................................................................................... 14
Environment & Quality of Life .................................................................................................................................................. 14
System Management, Preservation, & Resileincy ................................................................................................................. 16
Travel & Tourism ......................................................................................................................................................................... 16
3 Visioning & Plan Development ...................................................................................................................... 17
The Planning Process .................................................................................................................................................................. 20
Updating the Metropolitan Transportation Plan .................................................................................................................. 23
Incorporation Of Other Plans And Studies ............................................................................................................................ 24
Scenario Planning ....................................................................................................................................................................... 25
4 Regional Overview ................................................................................................................................... 30
Population Trends ....................................................................................................................................................................... 33
Land Use and Zoning ................................................................................................................................................................. 40
Travel Demand Model Analysis ............................................................................................................................................... 43
Employment .................................................................................................................................................................................. 47
Economic Activity ......................................................................................................................................................................... 48
5 The Transportation System ........................................................................................................................ 49
Roads and Bridges ..................................................................................................................................................................... 51
Pedestrian & Non-Motorized ................................................................................................................................................... 58
Transit ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 63
Air Travel ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 65
Waterways & Ports ................................................................................................................................................................... 66
Freight & Intermodal Facilities ................................................................................................................................................. 69
Rail ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 72
Trends In transportation ............................................................................................................................................................. 74
6 The Financial Plan & Implementation ........................................................................................................ 75
Local Funding Sources ................................................................................................................................................................ 76
State Funding Sources ................................................................................................................................................................ 79
Federal Funding sources ............................................................................................................................................................ 80
Fiscally Constrained Investment Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 83
Fiscally Constrained Projects .................................................................................................................................................... 87
Illustrative Projects ...................................................................................................................................................................... 89
Implementation ............................................................................................................................................................................ 95
Key words to search for in text: ........................................................................................................................ 11
Illustrative List Items: ........................................................................................................................................ 11
Appendix A Transportation Improvement Program
Appendix B 2016 Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
Appendix C 2017 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan
Appendix D Travel Demand Model Report
Appendix E System Performance Report
Appendix F MTP Planning Requirements - §450.324 CFR
Appendix G Major Thoroughfare Plan
Appendix H Amendments & Modifications
Executive Summary
CAMPO 2045 & Beyond
Metropolitan Transportation Plan
THE LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION ORGANIZATION
The Capital Area Metropolitan Transportation Organization (CAMPO) is responsible for long range
multimodal transportation planning in an area that includes five communities and a population of more than
73,000. The CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), updated every five years, is the
Long Range Transportation Plan for the CAMPO. Looking to a 2045 planning horizon, and through a large
amount of stakeholder and public input, the MTP anticipates transportation trends and needs throughout the
CAMPO Region and includes goals and strategies to meet those needs.
The MTP contains tools and resources to assist CAMPO and member jurisdictions with the implementation.
The Implementation Plan outlined in Section 7 includes a schedule for addressing strategies and actions and
provides staff with guidance in the development of an annual work program.
The 2045 MTP addresses topics and processes that were not included in previous iterations, including;
Scenario Planning, a refined illustrative list, updated funding resources and projections, and a more concise
plan for implementation. Other plans, such as the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation
Plan and the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan have been better incorporated into the planning
process used in the development of this iteration of the MTP. The updated travel-demand model will provide
the foundation for the development of a Major Thoroughfare Plan.
The MTP also includes a Financial Plan, outlined in Section 6. This section includes information on funding
resources, forecasted revenue and lists fiscally constrained and unconstrained projects. The projects listed in
the Financial Plan are reflective of the plan’s goals, strategies and vision that guide the planning process.
VISION
Maintain and support a resilient multi-modal network that improves quality of life and promote economic vitality through
planning for smart community growth.
GOALS
1. Improve safety and security for all travel modes
2. Support economic development and tourism throughout the region
3. Support regional partnerships and planning continuity across the region.
4. Improve efficiency in system management, operations, and movement of people and freight
5. Support land use practices that promote quality of life and economic vitality
6. Seek secure and reliable funding
7. Improve accessibility and mobility
8. Maintain a resilient transportation system
9. Provide a platform for multi-modal transportation educatio
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
1
1 Introduction & Federal
Compliance
The MTP, also referred to as a Long-Range Transportation Plan, assesses
regional transportation needs over a twenty years planning horizon. The
MTP sets goals and defines policies, programs, and projects to meet the
transportation needs of the CAMPO region as required by Federal law.
The MTP addresses all transportation modes, including the following:
• Surface Transportation (roads and bridges)
• Pedestrian and Non-Motorized
• Transit
• Air
• Waterways & Ports
• Freight
• Rail
The MTP plays a central role within the cyclical MPO planning process,
both responding to and advancing development of policies and
programs. The plan considers socio-economic and financial assumptions,
establishes performance measures, and identifies transportation-related
safety, environmental, and health issues. CAMPO will use aforementioned
considerations to develop scenarios as part of the update of the MTP.
More information about the developed scenarios can be found in Section
3.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
2
WHAT IS CAMPO?
CAMPO is the designated metropolitan planning organization for the Jefferson City urbanized
area. This CAMPO boundary, shown in Figure 1.3, includes the jurisdictions of Holts Summit,
Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, Wardsville, and portions of unincorporated, non-urbanized
areas within Cole and Callaway Counties. The CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) is
delineated by the CAMPO Board of Directors and approved by the Governor. The MPA has a
2010 population of 71,997 and covers approximately152.7 square miles.
Figure 1.3 CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area
Source: CAMPO
CORE FUNCTIONS
• Establishment and management of a fair and impartial setting for effective regional
decision making in the metropolitan area.
• Identify and evaluate alternative transportation improvement options.
• Maintenance of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan
• Annually develop a Transportation Improvement Program, outlining a 5-year fiscally
constrained list of transportation projects to be completed.
• Annually develop a Unified Planning Work Program, outlining tasks and budget.
• Involve the general public and other affected constituencies in the above
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
3
CAMPO BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
CAMPO is governed by a Board of Directors that consists of representatives from jurisdictions
within the planning area and representatives from the Missouri Department of Transportation
(MoDOT). Federal transportation representatives serve as ex-officio members. The Technical
Committee consists of representatives from the member jurisdictions’ professional staff and act in
an advisory capacity. A full list of members of the Board of Directors and Technical Committee
can be found at the front of this document.
The Board of Directors is responsible for providing official action on federally required plans,
documents, and programs. Additionally, the Board is responsible for changes in the bylaws and
changes to the MPO boundary.
REGIONAL COORDINATION
As a regional organization, CAMPO coordinates and collaborates with a number of partners,
including: Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Chambers of Commerce, Convention and Visitors
Bureaus, the Mid-Missouri Regional Planning Commission, and other various public and private
groups. Several meetings are held throughout the year at the MoDOT Central District level to
encourage collaboration between regional planning partners. These regional planning partners
are shown in the figure below.
Collaboration with these partner agencies is important in achieving CAMPO’s core functions and
responsibilities as listed above. This collaboration provides the opportunity to coordinate
planning and implementation activities. Thus, efficiency is improved and funding is maximized.
Figure 1.3 Planning Partners - MoDOT Central District
Source: CAMPO
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
4
FEDERAL COMPLIANCE
Development and maintenance of an MTP is a requirement for all Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPO). The MTP must be compliant with federal regulations issued by the United
States Department of Transportation (Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit
Administration), which governs the development of transportation plans and programs for
Urbanized Areas (UA). Federal law requires that every UA be represented by an MPO which
carries out the metropolitan transportation planning process for the UA and surrounding planning
area. A UA is comprised of a densely settled core of census tracts and/or census blocks that
contains 50,000 or more in population plus the incorporated surrounding areas meeting size or
density criteria as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. CAMPO is the designated MPO for the
Jefferson City Urbanized Area.
The MTP is prepared in accordance with federal statute 23 CFR Part §450.324, which requires
CAMPO to develop and update the MTP at least every 5 years to maintain validity and
consistency with current and forecasted transportation and land use conditions.
An outline of the MTP requirements as stated in §450.324 CFR can be found in Appendix F.
EDIT: UA VS AUA VS URBANIZED -
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/spm/fhwasa15067/chap3.cfm
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
5
PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMING
Performance-based Planning and Programing (PBPP) is a requirement of the Fixing America’s
Surface Transportation (FAST) Act and impacts both the MTP and the Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP). PBPP refers to the application of transportation performance
management (TPM) principles within the planning and programming processes of transportation
agencies to achieve desired performance outcomes for the multimodal transportation system.
CAMPO is required to use a performance-based approach to transportation decision making to
support the national federal highway performance goals listed below.
NATIONAL FEDERAL HIGHWAY PERFORMANCE GOALS
• Safety - To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all
public roads.
• Infrastructure Condition - To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state
of good repair
• Congestion Reduction - To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National
Highway System
• System Reliability - To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system
• Freight Movement and Economic Vitality - To improve the national freight network,
strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade
markets, and support regional economic development.
• Environmental Sustainability - To enhance the performance of the transportation
system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment.
• Reduced Project Delivery Delays - To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the
economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project
completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process,
including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies' work practices
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
6
FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The FAST Act continued a federal requirement for annual target setting collaboration between
State DOTs and planning partners on national performance measures. The System Performance
Report, part of the federal performance requirements, presents the condition and performance
of the transportation system with regard to performance measures, records performance targets,
and marks progress achieved in meeting the targets.
MPOs may choose between programing projects (1) in support of all the State targets, (2)
establishing specific numeric targets for all of the performance measures, or (3) establishing
specific numeric targets for one or more individual performance measures and supporting the
State target on other performance measures. The CAMPO Board of Directors has voted to
support state targets and measures in four areas listed below. Please note that there are
several additional targets MoDOT has adopted that CAMPO was not required to support that
are not listed below.
CAMPO’s performance measures and targets are outlined in detail in the System Performance
Report located in Appendix E.
•Number of Fatalities;
•Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million Vehicle Miles
traveled (VMT);
•Number of Serious Injuries;
•Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT; and
•Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-
motorized Serious Injuries
Safety
•percentage of pavements on the National Highway
System (NHS) in Good condition (excluding the
Interstate System)
•percentage of pavements on the NHS (excluding
the Interstate System) in Poor condition
•percentage of NHS bridges in Good condition
•percentage of NHS bridges in Poor condition
Pavement &
Bridge
•A measure that will assess the percent of reliable
person-miles traveled on the non-Interstate NHS.
Travel Time
Reliability &
Freight Reliability
•Asset Inventory
•Condition Assessment
•Management Approach – Decision Support Tools
•Investment Prioritization
Transit Asset
Management
(TAM)
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
7
MODOT’S LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The current MoDOT Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) was updated and approved by the
Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission and adopted on June 6, 2018. In addition to
collecting comments from stakeholders and the general public, the 2018 update included a large
amount of outreach and coordination with planning agencies around the state.
Like the CAMPO 2045 MTP, MoDOT’s LRTP set a 25-year vision for the state's transportation
system; establishing goals, objectives and performance management metrics. The LRTP analyzed
existing and emerging trends, both nationally and in Missouri. These trends included aging in
populations , increasing urbanization, advancing technology, and a younger population that isn’t
as interested in driving. The LRTP also included an analysis of emerging technology, such as
autonomous and connected vehicles (AV/CV), and their potential impact. Statewide system
needs and revenue forecasts are also identified in the LRTP. The figure below demonstrates the
many high-priority unfunded annual needs.
Figure 1.4 Missouri High-Priority Unfunded Annual Transportation Needs
Source: Citizen’s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri (November 2018)
In order to meet transportation needs the LRTP outlines the following goals:
• Take care of the transportation system and services we enjoy today
• Keep all travelers safe, no matter the mode of transportation
• Invest in projects that spur economic growth and create jobs
• Give Missourians better transportation choices
• Improve reliability and reduce congestion on Missouri’s transportation system
These goals, data, and input collected during the update of the LRTP were considered in the
update of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond MTP. Most of the needs identified in the LRTP were
identified in the MTP and the goals outlined in the MTP are also reflective of the state’s plan.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
8
2 Planning Factors
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act includes 10
planning factors that are required to be considered as part of the MTP
development process. The planning factors are reflected in the goals,
strategies, and projects contained in this plan and are addressed in
greater detail throughout this section.
Economic
Vitality Safety
Security Accessibility &
Mobility
Environmental
Protection &
Quality of Life
System
Integration &
Connectivity
System
Management
& Operations
System
Preservation
Resilency &
Reliability
Travel &
Tourism
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
9
ECONOMIC VITALITY
ESRi MSA Report
SAFETY & SECURITY
Planning for the safety and security of the transportation
network is central to several agencies and organizations at
the local, regional, state, and federal levels. The CAMPO
Region is home more than 73,000 people and includes a
complicated network of infrastructure, utilities, services, and
employment centers. The safety and security and of people
and resources is addressed cooperatively and collaboratively
by several planning partners throughout the region, including
transportation, public safety, and emergency management
agencies. Their relevant plans and responsibilities are
detailed below.
CAMPO ROADWAY ACCIDENT STATISTICS
CAMPO compiled accident data on roadway accidents,
car/train accidents, and bicycle and pedestrian accidents.
The intersections with the highest accident numbers from 2007
to 2011 are listed in the following two tables:
More information on safety performance measures can be found in Section 2.
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
2. INCREASE THE SAFETY OF
THE TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM FOR MOTORIZED
AND NON-MOTORIZED
USERS;
3. INCREASE THE SECURITY
OF THE TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM FOR MOTORIZED
AND NON-MOTORIZED
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
1. SUPPORT THE
ECONOMIC VITALITY OF
THE METROPOLITAN AREA,
ESPECIALLY BY ENABLING
GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS,
PRODUCTIVITY, AND
EFFICIENCY;
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
10
MISSOURI COALITION FOR ROADWAY SAFETY
The Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety (MCRS) is a wide ranging group of safety advocates
who originally came together in 2004 to create Missouri's Blueprint for Safer Roadways.
Planning partners include law enforcement, educators, emergency responders, and engineers
who have launched statewide efforts to reduce fatalities and create safer roads in Missouri.
The Coalition is responsible for the implementation of several safety campaigns, including:
• Seatbelt Use
• Work Zone Awareness
• Impaired Driving
• Pedestrian Safety Awareness
• Distracted Driving
• Commercial Motor Vehicle Awareness
• Motorcycle Awareness
• Youth Alcohol Enforcement
• Child Passenger Safety
The Blueprint, Missouri’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (HSP)
Missouri’s Blueprint – A partnership Toward Zero Deaths is a collective effort of the MCRS and
safety professionals throughout the state. The MCRS leads the charge to implement the Blueprint
and encourages safety partners to focus their activities and programs in support of the “Focused
Five” and subsequent emphasis areas, focus areas, and strategies. The state is divided into
seven regional coalitions that develop annual safety plans. These coalition’s meet on a regular
basis to discuss their concerns, review how their countermeasures are working, and consider ways
to improve their efforts. Approximately $2 million of state road funds is dedicated to this effort.
The Blueprint is an overarching strategic highway safety plan for the State of Missouri while the
state’s Highway Safety Plan serves as one of the implementation components in support of the
Blueprint efforts.
According to the HSP, Missouri’s ultimate Blueprint goal is that NO lives are lost due to a traffic
crash. However, an interim goal of 700 or fewer fatalities must be met in order to reach ZERO
deaths.
CAMPO staff participates to MCRS meetings and provides support to planning partners as
needed to assist in meeting the above goal. Staff receives crash data annually from MoDOT
and uses this and other datasets to provide regional partners with maps and statistics as
requested. Additionally, staff provides a quarterly crash report to the CAMPO Technical
Committee and Board of Directors.
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY
There are several plans, documents, or initiatives in the CAMPO Region in addition the strategies
in the MTP that address the infrastructure and safety needs of pedestrians and bicyclists:
• Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
• Jefferson City Area Greenway Master Plan
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
11
• Holts Summit Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Plan
• Missouri Boulevard Safety Assessment
• Jefferson City Sidewalk Plan
• Healthy Schools Healthy Communities Program
Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
The Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan, adopted in 2016, is intended as a resource to
improve safety, connectivity, and mobility for pedestrian and bicycle users in the CAMPO
planning area. The goals, recommendations, and strategies outlined in the plan can be used by
jurisdictions to develop an individualized implementation strategy to fit the unique pedestrian
and bicycle needs of that community. The plan is also intended to be a guide for future growth
by recommending strategies, policies, and procedures to guide future development and improve
existing infrastructure.
The process to develop the plan included intensive amount of public outreach that facilitate the
development of goals and strategies that would improve conditions for pedestrians and
bicyclists. The plan has been used by Jefferson City, Holts Summit, and St. Martins in the
development of grant applications seeking to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety in their
communities. Both Jefferson City and St. Martins adopted the plan.
The Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan can be found in Appendix B.
Missouri Boulevard Safety Assessment
In September 2014, United States Department of Transportation Secretary, Anthony Foxx,
launched “Safer People, Safer Streets” with the goal of reducing the growing number of
pedestrian, transit user, and bicyclist injuries and fatalities across the United States. As part of
this ongoing initiative, US Department of Transportation field offices are convened transportation
agencies to conduct road safety assessments in every state, launching a Mayors' Challenge for
Safer People and Safer Streets, and working with University Transportation Centers (UTCs) and
other stakeholders to identify and remove barriers to improving non-motorized safety. In 2016,
Jefferson City joined Kansas City in being the first two cities in the State of Missouri to have
conducted this type of safety assessment as part of the Safer People, Safer Streets initiative.
The 3.4 mile assessment of Missouri Boulevard qualitatively estimated and reported on potential
safety issues and identified opportunities for improvement. The assessment followed a model
used by federal partners who had conducted similar assessments across the United States. The
project was a collaborative effort by CAMPO and several planning partners, including;
Jefferson City Police Department, Jefferson City Public Works, JEFFTRAN (Jefferson City Transit),
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Capital Region Medical Center, and Mid-America Regional Council.
The Missouri Boulevard Safety Assessment has been cited by Jefferson City staff in seeking
funding for or planning for improvements to the corridor. The assessment is available on the
CAMPO website at www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING
Hazard mitigation is the effort to reduce loss of life and property by lessening the impact of
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
12
disasters. It is most effective when implemented under a comprehensive, long-term mitigation
plan. The plans identify risks and vulnerabilities associated with natural disasters, and develop
long-term strategies for protecting people and property from future hazard events. Mitigation
plans are key to breaking the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage.
Developing hazard mitigation plans enables state, tribal, and local governments to:
• Increase education and awareness around threats, hazards, and vulnerabilities;
• Build partnerships for risk reduction involving government, organizations, businesses, and
the public;
• Identify long-term, broadly-supported strategies for risk reduction;
• Align risk reduction with other state, tribal, or community objectives;
• Identify implementation approaches that focus resources on the greatest risks and
vulnerabilities; and
• Communicate priorities to potential sources of funding.
Moreover, a FEMA-approved hazard mitigation plan is a condition for receiving certain types of
non-emergency disaster assistance, including funding for mitigation projects. Ultimately, hazard
mitigation planning enables action to reduce loss of life and property, lessening the impact of
disasters.
Both Callaway and Cole Counties have approved Hazard Mitigation Plans. These plans include
data and strategies that address the impacts of natural and man-made disasters on the
transportation system. In addition to evaluating eleven natural hazards, the plan evaluates risks
associated with major rail or air transportation incidents, mass casualty events, and hazardous
materials release. All of these hazards can impact the transportation network and the people
and resources dependent upon that network.
The plans include a mitigation strategy that lays out prioritized actions and incorporates benefits
and costs associated with implementation of those actions. The plans can be found on the Mid-
MO RPC website at www.midmorpc.org.
THE STRATEGIC HIGHWAY NETWORK (STRAHNET)
The Strategic Highway Network is critical to the Department of Defense's (DoD's) domestic
operations. According FHWA, The STRAHNET is a 62,791-mile system of roads deemed
necessary for emergency mobilization and peacetime movement of heavy armor, fuel,
ammunition, repair parts, food, and other commodities to support U.S. military operations. Even
though DoD primarily deploys heavy equipment by rail, highways play a critical role.
The Surface Deployment and Distribution Command Transportation Engineering Agency
(SDDCTEA) is the DoD designated agent for public highway matters, including STRAHNET and
STRAHNET Connectors. The SDDCTEA identified STRAHNET and the Connector routes in
coordination with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the State transportation
departments, the military Services and installations, and the ports. Together, STRAHNET and the
Connectors define the total minimum defense public highway network needed to support a
defense emergency.
While the CAMPO Region does not include any STRAHNET routes or connectors, it does include
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
13
the intersection of three US Highways that provide additional connectivity to these routes.
Interstate 70, which lies 25 miles north, is a designated STRAHNET route. Fort Leonard Wood
and Whiteman Air Force Base are both located within 80 miles of the CAMPO Region and are
directly connected to the STRAHNET. Jefferson City is also home to the Missouri National Guard
Headquarters, which does use the network for the movement of certain equipment and would be
dependent upon it during certain types of activation.
RAIL SAFETY
There is only one Class I double track rail line and a short spur that runs through the CAMPO
Region, supporting both passenger and freight service. Owned by Union Pacific, that connects
St. Louis and Kansas City. Safety concerns in the CAMPO Region include at-grade crossings,
pedestrian access to tracks, and general rail car safety. While CAMPO has minimal interaction
with rail activity and safety, this mode is addressed the goals and strategies of the MTP.
CAMPO may provide support to regional planning partners or member jurisdictions in accessing
data or applying for grants to meet these strategies.
Missouri Highway-Rail Crossing Safety Program
Under MoDOT’s Multimodal Operations Division-Railroad Section, Missouri’s Highway-Railroad
Crossing Safety Program aims to improve highway-rail grade crossings throughout the state. The
program is funded by a combination of federal and state funds. The FHWA Section 130
Program is a federal aid program authorized by United States Code Title 23, Section 130, and
administered through the state by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The state
Grade Crossing Safety Account is funded by a 25 cent assessment on all Missouri motor vehicle
registrations or renewals authorized by Section 389.612, RSMO.
According to MoDOT, Missouri receives $6 million in Section 130 funds and another $1.2 million
per year through the state’s Grade Crossing Safety Account. These funds can only be spent on
improvements at public crossings for safety devices like flashing lights, gates or warning bells;
pavement markings; or the closure of a crossing. Every year public crossings are reviewed
taking into account factors like train and vehicle traffic counts, train and vehicle speed, sight
distance and accident history to select crossings for improvements.
Missouri has seen dramatic reduction in rail related safety accidents and injuries since the late
1970’s:
• Rail Collisions – reduced by 87%
• Rail Fatalities – reduced by 98%
• Rail Injuries – reduced by 82%
MoDOT’s Multimodal Operations Division-Railroad Section also administers a Rail Safety
Inspection Program and conducts a railroad safety outreach activities.
AIR SAFETY
Jefferson City Memorial Airport is the sole airport in the CAMPO region. It is a general aviation
facility with no commercial airline passenger services. CAMPO has been only minimally involved
in airport planning but is available if contacted for any type of data or planning assistance.
Jefferson City Memorial Airport began development of an updated Airport Master Plan in
2018. This plan will address a wide range of needs and opportunities including improvements to
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
14
the control tower.
MoDOT’s Aviation Section performs airport safety inspections at all public use general aviation
airports in Missouri; inspecting them once every three years. Inspections focus on identifying
safety concerns such as obstructions in the runway protection zones, nonstandard lighting and
pavement markings, and poor pavement conditions.
ACCESSIBILITY, MOBILITY, &
CONNECTIVITY
ENVIRONMENT & QUALITY OF LIFE
HSHC…
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
§450.324 (g)(10) A discussion of types of potential
environmental mitigation activities and potential areas to carry out
these activities, including activities that may have the greatest
potential to restore and maintain the environmental functions affected
by the metropolitan transportation plan. The discussion may focus on
policies, programs, or strategies, rather than at the project level. The
MPO(s) shall develop the discussion in consultation with applicable
Federal, State, and Tribal land management, wildlife, and regulatory
agencies. The MPO(s) may establish reasonable timeframes for
performing this consultation;
The MTP’s vision of improving quality of life is complimented
by addressing the resiliency and reliability of the
transportation system as it relates to the preservation and
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
5. PROTECT AND ENHANCE
THE ENVIRONMENT,
PROMOTE ENERGY
CONSERVATION, IMPROVE
THE QUALITY OF LIFE, AND
PROMOTE CONSISTENCY
BETWEEN
TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENTS AND
STATE AND LOCAL
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
4. INCREASE ACCESSIBILITY
AND MOBILITY OF PEOPLE
AND FREIGHT;
6. ENHANCE THE
INTEGRATION AND
CONNECTIVITY OF THE
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM,
ACROSS AND BETWEEN
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
15
conservation of the environment. The MTP includes many goals and strategies that provide for
consideration of environmental impacts such as supporting tourism, improving accessibility to
recreational and cultural opportunities, improving transit, regional collaboration, congestion
improvements, and providing opportunities for public engagement.
The CAMPO region and Mid-Missouri as a whole is home to several important natural resources,
open spaces, outdoor recreational opportunities, and cultural and historic attractions. The
transportation system should support these resources and attractions in order to improve quality
of life throughout the region.
CAMPO has invited…
NATURAL RESOURCES
Air Quality
Water Quality and Stormwater Mitigation
Endangered Species
OPEN SPACES & OUTDOOR RECREATION
Parks, Trails, etc.
CULTURAL & HISTORICAL ATTRACTIONS
Historic Districts
Buildings
Sites etc.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Transportation impacts on certain populations – adverse impacts…. located in section 3?
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
16
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT, PRESERVATION, & RESILEINCY
TRAVEL & TOURISM
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
7. PROMOTE EFFICIENT
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
AND OPERATION;
8. EMPHASIZE THE
PRESERVATION OF THE
EXISTING
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;
9. IMPROVE THE
RESILIENCY AND
RELIABILITY OF THE
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
AND REDUCE OR MITIGATE
STORMWATER IMPACTS OF
SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION; AND
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
10. ENHANCE TRAVEL AND
TOURISM
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
17
3 Visioning & Plan
Development
The MTP was developed through the use of inclusive public outreach,
integration of federal planning factors, and scenario planning resulting in
the development of the goals and strategies listed in the previous section.
The development process followed a national policy of facilitating a
“continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive performance-based
multimodal” process.
CAMPO
2045 &
Beyond
MTP
Planning
Factors
National
Goals
Performance
Measures
Stakeholder/
Public Input State Goals
Data
Analysis
Scenario
Planning
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
18
The Vision:
MAINTAIN AND SUPPORT A RESILIENT MULTI-MODAL
NETWORK THAT IMPROVES QUALITY OF LIFE AND
PROMOTE ECONOMIC VITALITY THROUGH PLANNING
FOR SMART COMMUNITY GROWTH.
GOALS & STRATEGIES
The following list of strategies was developed input from stakeholders and public surveys to aid
in achieving the goals listed above. These strategies provide guidance to staff and the CAMPO
Board of Directors in developing work programs, policies, and projects.
1. Improve safety and security for all travel modes
a. Identify locations for safety improvements
b. Improve collaboration between CAMPO and public safety agencies
c. Assist with railroad related safety and access improvements such as the
boarding platform, crossings, and right-of-way areas
d. Encourage collaboration between law enforcement and transit agencies
concerning security camera use
2. Support economic development and tourism throughout the region
a. Seek funding and provide support for improvements and access to the
airport, transit, and the river port
b. Improve accessibility to recreational and cultural opportunities
c. Expanding wayfinding throughout the region
d. Support creation of shuttle services for local and regional events
3. Support regional partnerships and planning continuity across the region.
a. Develop data in support of member jurisdictions’ comprehensive plans
b. Provide a forum for sharing planning best practices or processes
c. Strengthen collaboration with regional planning agencies
4. Improve efficiency in system management, operations, and movement of people
and freight
a. Maintain and update a regional travel demand model
b. Support access management programs
c. Identify current or potential congestion locations or bottlenecks
d. Identify potential locations for connection improvements
e. Improve existing inter-modal and multi-modal facilities
f. Support improvements to freight and people movement via rail, air, and
river port access
g. Improve inter-city and inter-regional transit operations and connectivity
h. Improve parking and services specific to freight hauler needs
i. Support development and implementation of local parking studies
5. Support land use practices that promote quality of life and economic vitality
a. Develop and maintain land use data in support of MPO and regional
planning partner needs
b. Support member jurisdictions’ plans for connectivity to parks, trails, and
open space
c. Provide mapping and data development support to local communities
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
19
6. Seek secure and reliable funding
a. Provide assistance to regional stakeholders in seeking grants and
completing applications
b. Maintain a prioritized comprehensive list of illustrative transportation
projects
c. Continue to maintain a Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
d. Maintain a list of funding sources and opportunities
e. Alert member jurisdictions of available funding resources as they are
announced
f. Collaborate with regional partners in leveraging funds or applying for
grants
7. Improve accessibility and mobility
a. Identify barriers to accessibility and mobility (sidewalks, crosswalks, signals,
signage, etc.)
b. Support development of ADA transition plans among member jurisdictions
c. Support improvements to and expansion of passenger rail service
d. Maintain and update the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
e. Maintain and update the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan
f. Review and update documents that support improvements to accessibility
such as the Title VI Plan, Limited English Proficiency Plan (LEP), and Public
Participation Plan (PPP)
8. Maintain a resilient transportation system
a. Encourage preservation of motorized and non-motorized transportation
corridors for future growth
b. Maintain a database of existing infrastructure and assets for use by
regional partners
c. Develop and maintain an accurate Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP)
d. Provide support in maintaining the MoDOT Transportation Management
System (TMS)
e. Support implementation of individual or collaborative pavement and bridge
management systems
f. Maintain an updated performance management plan
9. Provide a platform for multi-modal transportation education
a. Facilitate, promote and participate in local and regional educational
activities
b. Develop and disseminate educational tools and resources such as brochures,
maps, videos, and other media
c. Maintain a consistent public outreach schedule to keep members, planning
partners, and the public informed about new innovations or transportation
trends
d. Strengthen CAMPO’s social media presence
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
20
THE PLANNING PROCESS
In the spring of 2017, the CAMPO Board of Directors moved forward with a full update of the
entire Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The Technical Committee members were the key
reviewers during in the update of the plan. A full list of participants of Technical Committee
members is located at the front of this plan.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
From Fall 2018 to Spring of 2019 several meetings and public outreach events were held to
collect input, including; eight Technical Committee meetings, two Board of Directors meetings,
three stakeholder meetings, one workgroup meeting, three open house events. All of these
meetings and events are listed below.
• Technical Committee Meeting – September 6, 2018
• Technical Committee Meeting – October 4, 2018
• Open House – October 10, 2018
• Technical Committee Meeting – November 1, 2018
• Stakeholder Meeting – November 13, 2018
• Technical Committee Meeting – December 6, 2018
• Technical Committee Meeting – February 7, 2019
• Technical Committee Meeting – March 7, 2019
• Open House – March 19, 2019
• Work Group Meeting – March 26, 2019
• Technical Committee Meeting – April 4, 2019
• Technical Committee Meeting – May 2, 2019
• Board of Directors Meeting – May 15, 2019
• Board of Directors Meeting – June 19, 2019
Topics at these meetings or events included discussion and identification of problem areas,
opportunities for improvement, gaps in connectivity, and ordinances and policies. Meeting
participants provided staff with data and insight that facilitated the development of goals,
strategies, projects, programs, and policies that would further the CAMPO vision of maintaining
and supporting “ a resilient multi-modal network that improves quality of life and promote
economic vitality through planning for smart community growth”.
Meeting surveys and open house events, as seen in Figure 1.12, created a forum for direct
interaction with the public.
Figure 1.12 More than 50 people attended the June 25, 2015 Open House event, providing
CAMPO staff with a range of useful comments and suggestions on improving pedestrian and
bicycle access. Photo courtesy CAMPO Staff.
In addition to the public meetings and committee meetings CAMPO also invited comment and
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
21
participation of several other stakeholders including:
• Local Law Enforcement
• State and Federal Agencies
• Private Schools
• Tourism Promoters
• Local Non-Profits and Advocacy Groups
OUTREACH TO CAMPO JURISDICTIONS
Presentations were given and/or meetings held with each CAMPO jurisdiction during the
development of the plan. Each jurisdiction was given the opportunity provide input on the
development of the goals, strategies, and projects in the MTP.
STAKEHOLDER SURVEYS
A survey was sent to all member jurisdictions, board members, and technical committee members
requesting input on short term and long term needs throughout the region. The questionnaire was
used to identify high-priority transportation needs and possible solutions. Stakeholders were
asked to think about these needs in two categories; Near-Term (next 5 years) and Long-Term
(beyond 5 years).
The projects submitted by the stakeholders included …..
• Congestion on US 54/63 North of the Missouri River Bridge
• Safety and congestion issues at Clark Avenue, US 50/63, and Dunkin
• Safety and congestion issues at Dix Road and Hwy 50
• West Edgewood and Stadium Intersection Improvements
• Missouri Boulevard Capacity/Safety
• Safety Improvements on W. Truman at Scott Station Road and Ventura Ave.
• Safety Improvements at Swifts Hwy/Jefferson St.
• Safety and congestion issues Christy Drive/ Tanner Bridge/ Jefferson/ US 54
• Madison Street Safety and Capacity Issues
• South Summit Drive sidewalk, drainage, and intersection improvements
• Spalding Road and Park Place Drainage issues
• Van Horn & Julie Lane intersection improvements
• Greenway crossings and extensions
• Rt T/D and US 50 intersection and pedestrian issues
• Route B, M & W intersection in Wardsville
• Route B and Ashbury Way Safety and Congestion issues
• U 54 interchange improvements at Ellis, Southwest, and Stadium.
• Ellis Boulevard and Moreau Drive Intersection improvements
• Bald Hill and Seven Hills Intersection improvements
• E. Miller St. Roadway improvements
• South Country Club and US 50 Interchange Improvements
• US 50/63/Rex-Whitton Expressway Congestion Improvements.
• Halifax, Nieman & Major Intersection Improvements
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
22
• E. Simon drainage improvements
• US 54 in Holts Summit - Pedestrian access across highway on Central and E. Simon
• Additional overpass exit ramps at South Summit and US-54 in Callaway County
• Sidewalks in Holts Summit along Karen, Halifax, and S. Summit
• Katy Trail connectivity to Holts Summit
• Bike Lane installation
• Tri-level Improvements (US50,63, 54 interchange)
• Construction of a new transit facility for JEFFTRAN
• Extension of runways at Jefferson City Memorial Airport
• Renovation or replacement of the Amtrak Train Station in Jefferson City
• Construction of a port on the Missouri River
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
23
UPDATING THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The MTP is federally mandated to be updated every five years to reflect the changing needs
and capacity of the region. The next update of this plan will take place in 2023-2024. That
being said, if there are significant changes to growth patterns, demographics, technology or the
transportation network modifications or amendments may be made. As an example, the 2020
Decennial Census may facilitate changes to certain growth patterns or show a shift in regional
dynamics. New funding sources, changes in legislation, or shifts in revenue may also trigger
modifications to the plan. For these reasons, routine review of the plan is necessary.
AMENDMENTS & MODIFICATIONS
The MTP is updated every five years. Between updates the MTP may be changed through an
amendment or administrative modification. An amendment to the MTP is subject to a 7-day
public comment period after being reviewed by the Technical Committee and before being
approved by the Board of Directors. If staff conducts an administrative modification, notice will
be provided to the Board of Directors either prior to or immediately following the modification.
Appendix I contains a list of amendments and administrative modifications.
Definitions of an amendment or administrative modification, according to 23 CFR §450.104, are
as follows:
Administrative modification means a minor revision to a long-range statewide or
metropolitan transportation plan, Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), or
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) that includes minor changes to
project/project phase costs, minor changes to funding sources of previously included
projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation dates. An administrative
modification is a revision that does not require public review and comment, a
redemonstration of fiscal constraint, or a conformity determination (in nonattainment and
maintenance areas).
Amendment means a revision to a long-range statewide or metropolitan transportation
plan, TIP, or STIP that involves a major change to a project included in a metropolitan
transportation plan, TIP, or STIP, including the addition or deletion of a project or a
major change in project cost, project/project phase initiation dates, or a major change in
design concept or design scope (e.g., changing project termini or the number of through
traffic lanes or changing the number of stations in the case of fixed guideway transit
projects). Changes to projects that are included only for illustrative purposes do not
require an amendment. An amendment is a revision that requires public review and
comment and a redemonstration of fiscal constraint. If an amendment involves “non-
exempt” projects in nonattainment and maintenance areas, a conformity determination is
required.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
24
INCORPORATION OF OTHER PLANS AND STUDIES
The Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) takes into consideration several local and regional
planning efforts and studies. Many of these previous planning efforts have identified projects,
strategies, and activities that are aligned with the goals outlined in the MTP.
PLANS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
CAMPO Transportation Improvement Program (updated annually) Appendix A
Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan – 2016 Appendix B
CAMPO Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan – 2017 Appendix C
CAMPO Travel Demand Model – 2019 Appendix D
CAMPO Wayfinding Plan – 2016 Appendix G
Thoroughfare Plan (To be completed in late 2020, following completion of MTP) Appendix H
OTHER IMPORTANT PLANS AND STUDIES
The following list includes several other plans, studies, and assessments that have influenced the
development of the MTP and guide decision making within the MPO.
• Callaway County Hazard Mitigation Plan
• Callaway County Emergency Management Plan
• Central Missouri Multimodal Port Feasibility Study
• Cole County Master Plan
• Cole County Hazard Mitigation Plan
• Cole County Emergency Management Plan
• Cole County/Jefferson City, County-Wide Transportation Study (2003)
• Holts Summit Transportation Plan
• Holts Summit Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Plan
• Jefferson City Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
• Jefferson City Central East Side Neighborhood Plan
• Jefferson City CDBG Program Consolidated Plan
• Jefferson City Comprehensive Plan
• Jefferson City Greenways Master Plan
• Jefferson City Historic Preservation Plan
• Jefferson City Memorial Airport Master Plan
• Jefferson City Parking Study Update (2017)
• Jefferson City Sewerage Master Plan
• Jefferson City Southside Redevelopment Plan
• Jefferson City Transit Feasibility Study
• Jefferson City Transit System Wide Assessment (2017)
• Missouri River Freight Corridor Assessment & Development Plan
• Mid-Missouri Regional Planning Commission Regional Transportation Plan
• Mid-Missouri Regional Planning Commission Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
25
INCORPORATION OF STATE LRTP PLANNING AND GOALS
SCENARIO PLANNING
Scenario planning is a way to achieve a shared vision for the future by analyzing various factors
that can impact the way in which a region develops. A framework is developed to assist
stakeholders in making decisions to reach a shared vision for the future by analyzing multiple
variables that can impact the way in which a region develops. Transportation planning utilizes
scenarios by considering how changes in transportation, land use, resources, demographics, or
other factors such may affect connectivity, mobility, and resiliency throughout the region.
SCENARIOS
§450.324 (g)(7) Assessment of capital investment and other strategies to preserve
the existing and projected future metropolitan transportation infrastructure, provide for
multimodal capacity increases based on regional priorities and needs, and reduce the
vulnerability of the existing transportation infrastructure to natural disasters. The metropolitan
transportation plan may consider projects and strategies that address areas or corridors where
current or projected congestion threatens the efficient functioning of key elements of the
metropolitan area's transportation system.
§450.324 (g)(8) Transportation and transit enhancement activities, including
consideration of the role that intercity buses may play in reducing congestion, pollution, and
energy consumption in a cost-effective manner and strategies and investments that preserve
and enhance intercity bus systems, including systems that are privately owned and operated,
and including transportation alternatives, as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101(a), and associated transit
improvements, as described in 49 U.S.C. 5302(a), as appropriate;
HTTPS://WWW.RESEARCHGATE.NET/FIGURE/SCENARIO-DEVELOPMENT-PROCESS_FIG1_320043058
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
26
Scenario Comparison Language
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
27
SCENARIO COMPARISON
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
28
PREFERRED SCENARIO
After evaluating the four scenarios and gathering public input and stakeholder input the Trend
Scenario was chosen as the preferred scenario. This scenario represented a middle ground
between the Central City Scenario and the Unincorporated Growth Scenario. These scenarios
both reflect current trends seen in the community with larger amounts of new housing
development occurring in unincorporated areas and neighborhood plans and rezoning occurring
in the central part of Jefferson City. Both scenarios are reflected in the trend. The A Growth
Scenario provided staff and stakeholders with an opportunity to better identify weak points in
the transportation network that may be exacerbated during peak times, special events, or
potentially larger than expected growth were to occur.
Travel Demand Model Detail…
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
29
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
30
4 Regional Overview
The CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) includes portions of
Callaway and Cole Counties as well as five incorporated communities;
Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, and Wardsville. The
Region is connected by three US highways that all intersect in Jefferson
City just south of the Missouri River bridge.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
31
FIGURE 1 - CAMPO POPULATION BY JURISDICTION
Total
Population
Metropolitan Planning
Area Population
Persons Percent
City of Jefferson (Cole County) 43,057 43,057 59.80%
St. Martins 1,140 1,140 1.58%
Taos 878 878 1.22%
Wardsville 1,506 1,506 2.09%
Unincorporated Cole County 18,507 25.71%
City of Jefferson (Callaway County) 22 22 0.03%
Holts Summit 3,597 3,597 4.99%
Unincorporated Callaway County 3,290 4.57%
Totals 71,997 100.00%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Decennial Census
FIGURE 2 – POPULATION PER SQUARE MILE
Perhaps have the Urban Cluster area threshold be a break in this map so the urban area (census
designated) will show. - Sonny
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
32
FIGURE 3 – CAMPO RACIAL AND ETHNIC MAKEUP BY JURISDICTION
Total
One Race
Two
or
More
Races
Hispanic
White
Black or
African
American
American
Indian
and
Alaska
Native
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
and
Other
Pacific
Islander
Some
Other
Callaway County 44,332 40,778 2,032 217 245 17 201 842 707
Cole County 75,990 64,137 8,512 242 966 46 667 1,420 1,795
City of Jefferson 43,079 33,581 7,263 141 755 25 333 959 1,176
City of Holts
Summit 3,597 3,330 130 10 18 2 33 74 73
City of St. Martins 1,140 1,087 13 3 8 0 11 18 14
City of Taos 878 867 0 4 2 0 0 5 9
City of Wardsville 1,506 1,471 9 5 4 5 0 12 7
CAMPO MPA 71,997 60,022 8,613 240 957 46 685 1,426 1,855
Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Decennial Census
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
33
POPULATION TRENDS
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
34
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Environmental Justice, in terms of transportation planning, means identifying and addressing
disproportionately high and adverse effects of transportation projects, programs, and policies
on minority populations and low-income populations to achieve an equitable distribution of
benefits and burdens across the region.
Environmental Justice is important because it helps to ensure full and fair participation by
potentially affected communities in every phase of the transportation decision-making process.
When this is accomplished, the development, construction, operation and maintenance of
transportation projects should reflect an equitable distribution of benefits and burdens.
In 1994 an Executive Order, by President Clinton, was issued directing federal agencies, to the
greatest extent practicable, to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations
and low-income populations. In 1997, the Department of Transportation issued an Order to
address Environmental Justice in minority populations and low-income populations to summarize
and expand upon the previous 1994 Order. The Federal Highway Administration then issued its
own Order in 1998 in an effort to address the effects of their programs, policies, and activities.
Another Executive Order in 2000, expanded protection against national origin discrimination, by
ensuring programs are accessible by people with limited English proficiency.
Recipients of federal funding are to ensure that there are no disproportionate adverse impacts
in the above mentioned communities, or those considered transportation dependent due to age
or physical limitations, when allocating or spending federal funds.
The MTP identifies the locations of the following groups in order to better understand impacts of
transportation programs, policies, and activities.
• low-income
• elderly and youth
• disabled
• minority
• limited English proficiency
Federal guidance identifies significant areas as those which contain more of the vulnerable
population than the average for the region. The location of these populations has been
compared to the location of the constrained projects included in the Long Range Transportation
Plan once they are determined.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
35
LOW-INCOME
Low-income or poverty is determined by the federal poverty guidelines and are represented by
individuals living below 185% of the poverty line, which are generated annually based on
family size and composition. Low-income individuals and families may be more likely to seek
public transportation or other transportation alternatives to automobiles. … depicts the percent
of low-income populations within the CAMPO planning area.
The inner core of Jefferson City has block groups with significantly higher percentages, 25% to
65%, of persons living below the poverty line than in the outlying area.
ELDERLY
……….. shows the distribution of the elderly population within the CAMPO planning area.
As the “Baby Boomer” generation (individuals born in the United States between mid-1946 and
mid-1964) continues to reach retirement age, municipalities across the country will be faced with
the transportation needs of an increasingly aging population. The western portion of the
planning area and much of the surrounding rural area has higher percentages of elderly
individuals.
DISABLED
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
36
MINORITY & LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP) POPULATIONS
… shows the distribution of minority populations within the CAMPO planning area. The core,
and historically oldest, sections of Jefferson City has the highest density of minorities. There are
some higher concentrations of minorities that can be found in parts of unincorporated Cole
County as well.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
37
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENY PLAN (LEP)
This plan uses the recommended four-factor analysis of an individualized assessment considering
the four factors outlined above. Each of the following factors is examined to determine the level
and extent of language assistance measures required to sufficiently ensure meaningful access to
public transit services within the MPO area. Recommendations are then based on the results of
the analysis.
Factor 1: The Proportion, Numbers and Distribution of LEP Persons
Factor 2: Frequency of Contact with LEP Individuals
Factor 3: The Nature and Importance of the Program, Activity, or Service to LEP Community
Factor 4: The Resources Available to the MPO and Overall Cost
Table 1: Limited English Proficient Persons in the MPO Planning Area and local jurisdictions
Population 5 years old
and older
Number of Limited English
Proficient Persons
Percent of Limited English
Proficient Persons
City of Jefferson 40,152 87 0.22%
Holts Summit 3,000 11 0.37%
St. Martins 1,040 0 0%
Lake Mykee 321 3 0.94%
Taos 1,165 0 0%
Wardsville 1,525 0 0%
Entirety of Cole
County
71,005 416 0.59%
Entirety of
Callaway County
41,472 93 0.22%
Table 2: Language spoken at home by Limited English Proficient Persons in Callaway County
Spanish
Language
Spoken at
Home
Indo-European
Language Spoken
at Home
Asian and Pacific
Islander
Language
Spoken at Home
Other
Language
Spoken at
Home
5-17 years old 7 0 0 0
18-64 years old 51 0 27 8
65 and older 0 0 0 0
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
38
Total 58 0 27 8
Table 3: Language spoken at home by Limited English Proficient Persons in Cole County
Spanish
Language
Spoken at
Home
Indo-European
Language Spoken
at Home
Asian and Pacific
Islander
Language
Spoken at Home
Other
Language
Spoken at
Home
5-17 years old 93 0 0 0
18-64 years old 171 30 38 23
65 and older 61 0 0 0
Total 325 30 38 23
Map 1 - Limited English Proficient Person Distribution Population Map
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
39
TITLE VI
Why we do it and how it impacts our products…
The Federal Transit Administration requires recipients to report certain general information to
determine compliance with Title VI. The collection and reporting of this information constitutes a
recipient’s Title VI Program. To ensure compliance with 49 CFR Section 21.9 (b), the FTA requires
that all recipients document their compliance with this chapter by submitting a Title VI Program to
the FTA’s regional civil rights officer once every three years. As subrecipients, the Capital Area
Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) submits the information contained in this plan to
their primary recipient, MoDOT, on a schedule to be determined by the primary recipient, and is
to be included as part of their Title VI Program.
This report is provided as in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title 49,
Chapter 53, Section 5332 of the United States Code; and the Federal Transit Administration’s
(FTA) Circular 4702.1B, titled “VI Requirements And Guidelines For Federal Transit
Administration Recipients”, dated October 1, 2012.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
40
LAND USE AND ZONING
Existing Landuse Conditions…
Floodplain and Stormwater….
2016-2017 LAND USE ANALYSIS
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
41
ZONING
Existing zoning use and impacts…
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
42
JEFFERSON CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Current plan vs upcoming changes to the plan…
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
43
TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS
§450.324 (g)(1) The current and projected transportation demand of persons and
goods in the metropolitan planning area over the period of the transportation plan;
The modeling process is a system-level effort. Although individual links of a highway network
can be analyzed, the results are intended for determination of system-wide impacts. At the
system level, impacts are assessed on a broader scale than the smaller, localized project level.
METHOD
CAMPO required inclusion of portions of Callaway and Cole County to be included for travel
modeling and Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) development. Travel demand forecasts
included current travel demand, demand out to year 2045, and a long term planning horizon of
year 2045.
The model used current population and development information, based on census data and
parcel data to determine existing generalized land use, and forecasted future population and
land use development to 2045 as inputs to the travel demand model. The following methods
were used to determine residential and commercial development out to year 2035.
• The functional classification of the road network had been developed earlier, so traffic
counts on roadway links, and turning movements at selected intersections were conducted
for calibration purposes.
• 2010 census population data formed the baseline population.
• 2000 to 2010 growth rates were identified for CAMPO area, and then future growth
rates for Callaway and Cole County portions of CAMPO area were calculated.
• Municipal populations within CAMPO area were calculated, along with the urban and
rural proportions of CAMPO.
• Parcel data for Cole and Callaway Counties, from County Assessor files were used to
help determine an initial land use classification and specific facility size and class of
properties.
• Properties were defined using both general land use classification codes and ITE land
use classifications codes.
• Maps developed through the City of Jefferson Geographic Information System were
used to evaluate development potential for currently undeveloped areas within CAMPO.
Development constraints, such as flood plains, steep slopes, and provision of sewers and
utilities were used to identify physical limitations to future development.
• Significant identifiable commercial and residential developments, (within 5-10 years)
were included in the future land use map. Other less identifiable development (15-20
years out) was added to the future land use map later, but with less detail.
• New roads were added to the network first, as projects that clearly were going on the
network such as interchanges, arterials and corridors for arterial roads.
PROJECTED TRAVEL DEMAND FOR PEOPLE AND FREIGHT
The number of vehicle miles of travel (or VMT) is an indicator of the roadway system travel
levels by motor vehicles and is an estimate, based upon traffic volume counts and roadway
lengths, for a specific point in time. So, estimated VMT was determined by the use of the
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
44
CAMPO travel demand model at three points in time with 10 year intervals
VMT: Vehicle miles of travel - the number of vehicles on a link, generally for a daily period,
multiplied by the length of the link, in miles. The VMT for a study area is the sum of the VMTs for
each link.
Forecast Future Travel Demand
• Daily VMT New MPO MPA (modeled roads only)
• Year 2010 = 1,759,282 Vehicle Miles Traveled
• Year 2020 = 1,909,957 Vehicle Miles Traveled
• Year 2035 = 2,055,874 Vehicle Miles Traveled
Projected Traffic Volumes to Capacity (V/C)
Generally, intersections are the congestion points in the roadways. Intersections generate conflicts
with turning movements, differences in vehicle speeds, and cross traffic requirements for
stoplights. Intersections that have reached their maximum ability to move traffic through that
intersection are said to have reached 100% of their capacity. The result is traffic backup,
delays, and possible “gridlock” during peak hours in the morning and evening, with the evening
congestion frequently being of longer duration.
Other congestion methods such as Levels of Service or LOS may be used (including intersection
and road segment levels of service) but the modeling software and methodology used here lends
itself more to intersection volume and capacity measurements.
The following levels of service are listed for reference, and may be found in the Highway
Capacity Manual and AASHTO Geometric Design of Highways and Streets.
LOS A = a Free flow
LOS B = a reasonably free flow
LOS C = a stable flow
LOS D = approaching an unstable flow
LOS E = an unstable flow
LOS F = forced flow or breakdown in flow
Table 27: 2020 and 2035 Critical Intersections Level of Service
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
45
Figure 8: Map of Forecasted Traffic Volumes in 2035 on Major Routes
Figure 9: Forecasted Locations Where Traffic Volume Exceed Capacity
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
46
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
47
EMPLOYMENT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
48
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
49
5 The Transportation
System
This section identifies existing major roadways, transit, multimodal and
intermodal facilities, pedestrian walkways, bicycle facilities, and intermodal
connectors, and identifies proposed facilities to the system.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
50
§450.324 (g)(2) Existing and proposed transportation facilities (including major
roadways, public transportation facilities, intercity bus facilities, multimodal and intermodal
facilities, nonmotorized transportation facilities (e.g., pedestrian walkways and bicycle
facilities), and intermodal connectors) that should function as an integrated metropolitan
transportation system, giving emphasis to those facilities that serve important national and
regional transportation functions over the period of the transportation plan.
§450.324 (g)(10) A discussion of types of potential environmental mitigation
activities and potential areas to carry out these activities, including activities that may
have the greatest potential to restore and maintain the environmental functions affected by
the metropolitan transportation plan. The discussion may focus on policies, programs, or
strategies, rather than at the project level. The MPO(s) shall develop the discussion in
consultation with applicable Federal, State, and Tribal land management, wildlife, and
regulatory agencies. The MPO(s) may establish reasonable timeframes for performing this
consultation;
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
51
ROADS AND BRIDGES
The CAMPO planning area consists of an extensive network of roadways and bridge . This
network ranges from local streets serving neighborhood needs to freeways and expressways
serving national and regional trip purposes.
This network is the primary system used to support the efficient movement of people and goods
within and through the region. The network includes at least 6,874 total miles of roads and 159
bridges.
ROAD NETWORK
with approximately 53 percent (3,625 miles) maintained by municipalities in the urban area.
Maintenance responsibilities for these roads are listed in Table 13-1.
Private roads are not included in the campo network nor are interstate highways, tribal lands
roadways, or federal lands roadways that may be included in some other mpo areas.
Roadways are usually defined by one of two methods, by design or function. MPOs generally
use functional classification of roadways to describe or define a roadway, and these roadway
functional classifications are reviewed periodically. These roadways are divided into urban and
rural, and are further classified as:
• Interstate
• Freeway/Expressway
• Other Principle Arterial
• Minor Arterial
• Collector (major or minor)
• Intermodal Connector, and
• Local road
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
52
Figure 5.1 CAMPO Roadways - Functional Classification
Placeholder Map
MAJOR STREET AND HIGHWAY ROUTES
US Highways: The major routes into and through the region are US highways 54/50/63,
intersecting at a point in northern Cole County and south of the Missouri River, near the center of
Jefferson City.
1. United States Route 63, from United States Route 36 and the proposed Interstate Route
72 to the East-West Trans-America corridor, at the Arkansas State line.
2. United States Route 54, from the Kansas State line to United States Route 61/ Avenue of
the Saints.
Traffic Volumes
The 2010 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) for US 54 was 26,582 near the Holts Summit
area in Callaway County and 21,726 AADT south of Ellis Boulevard in Jefferson City, while US
63 west of Jefferson City and north of the river, in Callaway County had 18,564 AADT. The
Missouri River Bridge Crossing, connecting Cole and Callaway Counties has a January, 2011
count of 52,757 vehicles per day (AADT).
For US 50, the east/west route through Jefferson City had a 2010 count of 36,423 AADT west
of the tri-level, the interchange where these three primary routes meet, and 34,520 east of the
tri-level.
Other Principal Arterials: Other Principal Arterial routes, in and around the City of Jefferson,
including MO Rt. 179, Missouri Boulevard, Stadium Boulevard, and Ellis Boulevard. MO Rt. 179
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
53
carried 14,117 AADT in 2010 north of Rt. C, Missouri Boulevard carried 36,423 AADT between
Southwest Boulevard and the tri-level, and Ellis Boulevard carried 14,489 AADT near the US 54
interchange and MO Rt. B.
New roadways are a lower priority than system preservation. Some additions are necessary
however, several bypasses are recommended in outer years, a second bridge crossing is
recommended, and resolution to the US 50/63 Whitton Expressway bottleneck is constantly
identified as a priority as are Ellis Blvd. at US/54, along with Stadium Blvd. and Jefferson St. at
US/54.
Minor Arterials:
In 2010, MO Rt. C is a significant Minor Arterial. Located in the southwest part of the City of
Jefferson, it carried between 12,000 AADT between Stadium Blvd. and MO Rt. 179. Another
significant Minor Arterial is Industrial Drive extending from US 54 to Truman Drive which
continues on to connect to US 50 on the west side of the Jefferson City. Industrial Drive/Truman
Drive carried 11,160 AADT east of MO Rt. 179 and 17,000 AADT between Scott Station Road
and US 50 West. Remaining Minor Arterials carry substantially less traffic, from 5,000 to 9,000
AADT. See Table 6 for additional information.
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM UNDER MAP 21
In general - for the purposes of 23 USC, the Federal-aid system is the National Highway System,
which includes the Interstate System.
The National Highway System consists of roadways important to the nation's economy, defense,
and mobility. All principal arterial routes that are not currently on the NHS before October 1,
2012, will automatically be added to the NHS provided the principal arterials connect to the
NHS in a one-time addition. There will be no restrictions on maximum NHS mileage.
The National Highway System (NHS) includes the following subsystems of roadways (note that a
specific highway route may be on more than one subsystem):
1. Interstate: The Eisenhower Interstate System of highways retains its separate identity
within the NHS.
2. Other Principal Arterials: Highways in rural and urban areas that provide access
between an arterial and a major port, airport, public transportation facility, or other
intermodal transportation facility.
3. Strategic Highway Network (STRAHNET): A highway network important to the United
States' strategic defense policy, providing defense access, continuity and emergency
capabilities for defense purposes.
4. Major Strategic Highway Network Connectors: Highways that provide access between
major military installations and highways that are part of the Strategic Highway
Network.
5. Intermodal Connectors: These highways provide access between major intermodal
facilities and the other four subsystems making up the National Highway System.
For the Jefferson City MPA NHS Routes consist of US 50East and West in Cole County, and US
54 and 63 through the entire MPA.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
54
CONGRESSIONAL HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDORS ON THE NHS
There are two Congressional High Priority Corridors that pass through the CAMPO area:
1. United States Route 63, from United States Route 36 and the proposed Interstate Route
72 to the East-West Trans-America corridor, at the Arkansas State line.
2. United States Route 54, from the Kansas State line to United States Route 61/ Avenue of
the Saints.
These corridors are congressionally designated. According to the FHWA website, the only
criteria for being a congressionally designated High Priority Corridor is that it is what Congress
designates. Although, there are some routes that have federal money attached to them, none are
in the CAMPO area.
CAMPO and MoDOT reviewed and revised the Roadway Functional Classification system in
early 2013.
Table 3: CAMPO 2013 MPA Roadway Mileage by Functional Classification and jurisdiction
Urban
Other
Freeway
Expressway
Urban
Other
Principal
Arterial
Urban
Minor
Arterial
Urban
Collector
Urban
Local
Rural
Other
Principal
Arterial
Rural
Minor
Arterial
Rural
Major
Collector
Rural
Minor
Collector
Rural
Local
Total Percent of
Total
(Jurisdiction)
Callaway County 2.3 2.9 11.2 0.9 2.9 13.9 34.2 5.32%
Cole County 3.6 5.9 70.1 4.6 3.3 82.4 169.8 26.46%
Holts Summit 3.1 4.1 14.5 0.5 0.6 22.7 3.53%
City of Jefferson* 4.3 37.4 23.6 190.6 255.9 39.87%
MoDOT 34.6 8.7 18.2 11.9 5.6 5.4 5.3 32.7 1.0 0.1 123.5 19.24%
Lake Mykee 2.0 2.0 0.32%
State of Missouri** 4.0 1.6 5.6 0.87%
St. Martins 1.5 0.5 7.4 0.7 10.0 1.55%
Taos 9.6 9.6 1.50%
Wardsville 8.6 8.6 1.33%
Total (Functional Class)
34.6 13.0 66.1 48.8 305.3 5.4 6.3 37.8 7.7 116.9 641.8 100.00%
Percent (Functional Class)
5.4% 2.0% 10.3% 7.6% 47.6% 0.8% 1.0% 5.9% 1.2% 18.2%
*Includes Parks & Rec. and Interim
** MDC, MDNR, MDOC, etc.
MISSOURI RIVER BRIDGE IMPACTS…
Closures of Jefferson City Bridge of Rocheport Bridge – portential impacts and detours…
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
55
Jefferson
City
35
Callaway
County
2
Cole
County
22
Taos
2
61
Off-System
Bridges
Jefferson
City
69
Callaway
County
6
Cole
County
20
St.
Martins
1
Holts
Summit
2
98
State-System
Bridges
BRIDGES
Based on a data provided by MoDOT’s Transportation Management System, there are 161
bridges in the CAMPO planning area. 100 of these bridges are “state-system” bridges that are
inspected, maintained, and rehabilitated by MoDOT. The other 61 bridges are “off-system”
structures that are the responsibility of local jurisdictions, although MoDOT may provide some
support in inspection.
The Missouri River Bridge
The Missouri River crossing consists of two separate bridges, a northbound and southbound
bridge. The southbound bridge opened in 1955, with a total length of 3,093 feet, a deck width
of 37.7 feet, and a vertical clearance of 37.7 feet. The northbound bridge opened in 1991 with
a total length of 3,124.2 feet, a vertical clearance of 16.1 feet, with a deck width of 46.9 feet.
A pedestrian bridge, opened in April 2011, is located on the Eastern side of the North bound
birdge. The pedestrian bridge is only open to bicycle and foot traffic and provides connectivity
between Jefferson City and parks and the Katy Trail on the North side of the river. At 2,953
feet long and eight feet wide, it includes two look out points.
The Missouri River Bridge has been identified as part of the regional critical transportation
infrastructure with 52,757 vehicles crossing these bridges on an average day in 2010. The
nearest alternative Missouri River bridge crossings are at Hermann, Missouri on Missouri Route
19, approximately 40 miles to the east or between Boone and Cooper Counties on Interstate 70,
approximately 32 miles to the northwest.
Nearby to the south is the “tri-level”, a set of bridges and ramps at which the three U.S.
highways, US 50, US 54, and US 63 intersect south of the Missouri River. This intersection point is
also identified as regional critical infrastructure and is regularly identified as a periodic point of
traffic congestion.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
56
STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT OR FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE BRIDGES
Bridges are inspected and maintained on a regular basis, but two terms identify bridges that
require attention “structurally deficient” and “functionally obsolete”.
The term “structurally deficient” does not mean that a bridge is going to collapse, but that a
significant load-carrying element is in poor condition because of deterioration or damage and
needs to be addressed. The other term, “functionally obsolete” means that a bridge is
structurally sound but to some degree unable to handle the volume of traffic that uses it.
City, County and State transportation agencies do a good job of monitoring the condition of
bridges in the MPA, and CAMPO will include bridges in the infrastructure databases and
database development and maintenance program and for the safety element in CAMPO
planning program.
CAMPO identifies bridge safety and efficiency as extremely high priority in planning and
programming for municipalities, Counties and State facilities.
CAMPO is seeking a higher level of funding and programming for replacement and maintenance
of structurally deficient or functionally obsolete bridge structures.
The Structurally Deficient and Functionally Obsolete bridges are listed in the following table:
Structurally Deficient
1. A condition rating of 4 or less for
o Deck; or
o Superstructures; or
o Substructures; or
o Culvert and Retaining Walls.(1) or
2. An appraisal rating of 2 or less for
o Structural Condition; or
o Waterway Adequacy.(2)
Functionally Obsolete -
1. An appraisal rating of 3 or less for
o Deck Geometry; or
o Underclearances;(3) or
o Approach Roadway Alignment. or
2. An appraisal rating of 3 for
o Structural Condition; or
o Waterway Adequacy.(2)
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
57
Table 4: Structurally Deficient and Functionally Obsolete Bridges
Facility Carried Feature Intersected Maintenance
Responsibility
Year
Built
Type of Work
Needed
Total Project
Cost Status
Source: National Bridge Inventory
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
58
PEDESTRIAN & NON-MOTORIZED
§450.324 (g)(12) Pedestrian walkway and bicycle transportation facilities in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 217(g).
Walking and bicycling are important aspects of a community’s public health, economic vitality,
safety, environmental sustainability, and mobility. These modes of transportation are especially
important for children, the elderly, the disabled, and those with fixed or low incomes.
Walkability and bikeability are important to attracting tourists and attracting or retaining
residents alike.
Figure 1.1 Riders gather during the July 2016 Salute to America “Red, Bike, and Blue” bicycle event. The annual event is a patriotic
themed bicycle ride that includes a scenic seven-mile loop encompassing the Capitol, the Missouri River Pedestrian Bridge and the Katy
Trail access.
The CAMPO planning area encompasses both urban and rural areas. The communities of Holts
Summit and Jefferson City are generally walkable with sidewalks, trails, and connectivity to Katy
Trail State Park. Smaller communities have limited connectivity and have little to no public
sidewalks. The need for greater connectivity, access, and safety are important. Improving
connectivity and access will provide more direct, convenient, and safe travel routes for walking
and bicycling while also providing more travel choices, reduce dependency on automobiles, and
improve general quality of the life.
CAPITAL AREA PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE PLAN
Adopted in 2017, the Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan is intended as a resource to
improve safety, connectivity, and mobility for pedestrian and bicycle users in the CAMPO
planning area. The goals, recommendations, and strategies outlined in the plan can be used by
jurisdictions to develop an individualized implementation strategy to fit the unique pedestrian
and bicycle needs of that community. The plan is also intended to be a guide for future growth
by recommending strategies, policies, and procedures to guide future development and improve
existing infrastructure, making the CAMPO planning area a great place to walk and bike.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
59
The plan, located in Appendix B, has been incorporated into the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond MTP.
RECENT TRENDS
Recent trends in non-motorized travel in the CAMPO region includes the 2018 introduction of
motorized dockless scooters and bicycles to Jefferson City. These bicycles and scooters are the
property of, and operated by, SPIN, a private company running similar operations across the
nation. Total rides for bicycles in calendar year2018 were 2,037.
Missouri has six cross-country bicycle routes running through it, including the TransAmerica Trail
Bicycle Route, the Route 66 Bicycle Route, and the American Discovery Bicycle Route. Please see
Figure XX for a map of all routes running through or in Missouri.
SIDEWALKS
Sidewalk accessibility and connectivity is limited by gaps, obstructions, and poor conditions in
some areas. That being said, there are several areas in the CAMPO region where recent
improvements have increased accessibility and condition dramatically. Replacement and
improvement to sidewalks and crosswalks along Missouri Boulevard in 2016 provided much
needed connectivity between Missouri Boulevard’s commercial strip and downtown Jefferson
City. The 2014 construction along US Business 50 east of St. Martins included installation of 3.5
miles sidewalks and signalized crosswalks. The project was part of a Safe Routes to School
project that provided connectivity between Pioneer Trails Elementary School, nearby residential
areas, and Binder Lake Park. Recent construction of sidewalks and crosswalks in Holts Summit
also improved connectivity and accessibility between nearby schools, parks, and residences.
All sidewalks have been assessed and inventoried in the CAMPO region, reflecting the
improvements listed above. CAMPO staff maintains a sidewalk database that is regularly
updated and incorporates data that has been collected in cooperation with several regional
partners. Data collected from the 2010 Jefferson City Sidewalk Plan, Callaway County
Sidewalk Inventory, and Cole County Sidewalk Inventory have been incorporated into this
database. Additionally, more than 350 marked or designated crosswalks are also found in the
database.
THE ABOVE TAKEN FORM BIKE PED PLAN
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
60
The City of Jefferson conducted a sidewalk inventory in 2008, adopted A Sidewalk Plan for
Jefferson City, Missouri in February of 2010 by passing an ordinance adopting the plan(ord.
32-105-112), and developed a rating matrix in 2012. This matrix is a snapshot of sidewalk
conditions in Jefferson City from 2012. Listed below in Figure 5.x are examples of federally
funded sidewalks and their funding source from 2013-Winter 2019:
Figure 5.x
Project Location Jurisdiction Federal Funding Source
Summit Dr./Simon Blvd. Sidewalk
and Intersection Improvements
Holts Summit Transportation
Enhancement*
Missouri Blvd. Sidewalk Project
Phase 2
Jefferson City Transportation
Enhancement*
Pioneer Trail School Cole County Safe Routes to School*
North Summit Drive Sidewalk Holts Summit Transportation Alternatives
Program
Wayfinding Signage Jefferson City Transportation Alternatives
Program
Missouri Blvd. Sidewalk, Beck to
Waverly
Jefferson City Transportation Alternatives
Program
Business 50 West
Bicycle/Pedestrian & ADA
Safety Improvements &
Resurfacing
St. Martins Transportation Alternatives
Program
Ash Street Sidewalk Jefferson City Community Development
Block Grant Funds
Clark Ave/Moreau Dr. Sidewalk
Improvements
Jefferson City Community Development
Block Grant Funds
Marshall Street Sidewalks Jefferson City Community Development
Block Grant Funds
Roland Sidewalk Improvements Jefferson City Community Development
Block Grant Funds
Broadway Street Sidewalks Jefferson City Community Development
Block Grant Funds
Clay Street Bike Project Jefferson City Community Development
Block Grant Funds
* Indicates a federal funding source no longer available
According to city ordinance, property owners are required to build and maintain sidewalks. The
city will build sidewalk in certain capital improvement projects, but they do not replace broken
sidewalks. Figure 5.x demonstrates the roads that the City of Jefferson has designated as
needing sidewalk
Figure 5.x - City of Jefferson Sidewalk Master Plan 12/26/12
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
61
In 2017, in conjunction with the City of Jefferson Geographic Information Systems division and
the Capital Region Medical Center, CAMPO staff assisted in the creation of a Sidewalk
Management System. The program helps the city to prioritize sidewalk repair and replacement,
in correlation with other capital improvements, such as storm water, new street overlays, or
emergency management projects.
Holts Summit identifies sidewalks as a priority in their Draft Long Range Transportation Plan.
CAMPO will support a comprehensive program to identify, maintain and improve sidewalks
throughout the MPO area.
GREENWAYS AND TRAILS
Shared path greenways and unpaved trails are an important recreational and travel facility for
urban areas. They are very popular with residents nationwide and a commodity that is
marketed by realtors.
Because of the high costs to build greenways and trails, which has ranged from $90 per foot to
$465 per foot, oftentimes municipalities apply for grants from the Missouri Department of
Natural Resources Division of State Parks. Listed below in Table YEA are projects using
Recreational Trail Grant money in the CAMPO region from 2013-Winter 2019.
Table YEA
Project Location Jurisdiction
Trail Connection Project Phase II Holts Summit
Niekamp Park Trailhead, Phase I St. Martins
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
62
Frog Hollow Greenway Trail Extension
Phase 2
Jefferson City
Community Park Greenway Trailhead Jefferson City
Binder Bike Park Phase 1 Jefferson City (Application by Osage
Region Trail Association)
CAMPO will advocate and assist member jurisdictions in planning, funding and programming
expansion and connectivity of greenways and trail systems within in the MPA through local
development efforts.
Sidewalks Miles
Cole County 4
Holts Summit 5.6
Jefferson City 118.5
Taos 0.5
Wardsville 0.18
Trails Miles
Greenway Trails and Spurs 14.9
Park/Fitness Trails 3.45
Mountain Bike Trails 15.35
State Owned Trails 3.3
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
63
TRANSIT
There are several transportation providers that operate in the Mid-Missouri are and statewide.
The CAMPO region is served by many of these agencies, including fixed-route providers like
JEFFTRAN in Jefferson City and rural providers like Oats, Inc., which serves users throughout
northern and central Missouri or Serve, Inc. in Callaway County.
COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan is updated every three years
per federal regulation. The plan provides an overview of current conditions, capacities, and
goals as they relate to transit in the CAMPO region. The CAMPO Coordinated Public Transit-
Human Services Transportation Plan is located in Appendix C.
FIXED ROUTE SERVICE
JEFFTRAN is the public transportation provider for the City of Jefferson. Operated as a division
in the Department of Public Works of the City of Jefferson, JEFFTRAN provides fixed route and
paratransit services within the city limits of Jefferson City.
JEFFTRAN operates six fixed routes and three commuter/school tripper routes during the school
year.
Regular fixed route service operates Monday through Friday from 6:45 AM to 5:45 PM (except
holidays) using a “pulse” system, where all routes except the Capital Mall route converge on the
transfer point at 40 minute intervals.
All buses on regular scheduled routes have bicycle racks to accommodate two bicycles and is
part of the JEFFTRAN Bike 'n' Ride program.
When travel requires changing to a different route to complete a journey, a transfer point
becomes necessary. The transfer center is on 820 East Miller Street.
CAMPO staff continues to assist JEFFTRAN in consultation, programming, scheduling and maps as
needed. CAMPO assists JEFFTRAN with their Program of Projects processes. No expansion is
proposed, but increased efficiency in routes has been introduced by changing routes and
schedules.
JEFFTRAN PARATRANSIT SERVICES
“Handi-Wheels” complementary paratransit services are provided by JEFFTRAN, providing curb
to curb service for individuals with disabilities and those unable to use fixed route transportation
systems (an "origin to destination" service). Although the Handi-Wheels service operates entirely
within the city limits, it provides services beyond the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 through a larger than required service area. Within this service area,
eligible residents may receive services from 6:45 AM to 5:45 PM Monday through Friday.
Handi-Wheels service utilizes eight vehicles that report 1,930 ADA qualified passengers with
daily transport of as many as 300 riders. All buses are wheelchair-lift equipped and provide
transportation for those individuals who because of disability cannot travel to or from a "fixed
route" bus stop or cannot get on, ride or get off a "fixed route" bus.
Funding is provided through a mix of sources such as passenger fares, local funding, FTA funding
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
64
and contracts. Handi-Wheels can pick up clients anywhere inside the city limits and take them to
any destination within the city limits.
Handi-Wheels riders must apply for and be approved in order to use this service. Applications
and detailed service descriptions are available in standard print and accessible formats.
RURAL TRANSIT SERVICE
OATS Inc. is a not-for-profit transportation service available to the general public in the rural
areas of Callaway and Cole Counties with priority service to senior citizens and persons with
disabilities. Anyone living in rural areas whose needs can be met by OATS’ service schedules is
eligible to ride their local OATS buses. OATS, Inc. ridership numbers remain strong after 40
years of service and the service continues to grow in popularity.
Serve Inc. serves the residents of Callaway County through CALTRAN a public transportation
program based in Fulton.
MISSOURI RIDESHARE AND CARPOOL PROGRAM
The Missouri Rideshare and Carpool Program is a free service provided by the Missouri
Department of Natural Resources. The program organizes carpools by matching commuters who
live and work in the same vicinity and serve many counties in Mid-Missouri.
MoDOT supports carpooling through the “Carpool Connections” website at:
www.modot.org/carpool-connections
Carpool/Commuter lot locations:
• By the municipal airport
• Across US 54 at the Jefferson City Park
• US 50/63 East at Route M and J
OTHER SERVICES
• Charter Service and Shuttles - D&K Bus Service, First Student Inc., Tyus Executive
Transportation Service.
• Greyhound Bus – Connection located in Jefferson City of Jefferson
• Rideshare - UBER
• Taxi/ limousine - Checker Cab of Jefferson City LLC., Capitol City Limousine, and Sedan
Inc. and Chase Limousines.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
65
AIR TRAVEL
The CAMPO Region includes one airport, the Jefferson City Memorial Airport, and a handful of
helicopter landing platforms. While there are no commercial airlines operating within the
Region, Columbia Regional Airport is located 20 miles away and does provide this service.
Private aircraft, the Missouri National Guard, medical transport, or other government agencies
represent the majority of aircraft use in the Region. An updated Airport Master Plan will be
completed in 2019. CAMPO has incorporated elements of the plan into the goals, strategies,
and projects listed in the MTP.
JEFFERSON CITY MEMORIAL AIRPORT
Jefferson City Memorial Airport is a general aviation facility with no commercial airline
passenger services. Constructed in 1948, the facility is located north of the Capitol in the
Missouri River floodplain and is occasionally affected by flooding. The airport facility consists of
a 4,800 square foot Airport Terminal Building, Air Traffic Control Tower, one 6,000 foot long
runway with instrument approach procedures, and one crosswind runway 3,400 feet long. Both
runways are equipped with parallel taxiways. The control tower operates from 6:00 a.m. until
9:30 p.m. 365 days a year and 24-hour radar approach services are provided by Mizzou
Approach in Springfield, Missouri. On-site services include a restaurant, fuel services and flight
products and a full service fixed base operator.
Approximately 64 aircraft are based at the airport either permanently or intermittently; 70%
are single-engine or multi-engine planes. Approximately 10 jet engine planes and small number
of helicopters and military aircraft are also based at the airport. These numbers fluctuate and
are based on 2017 staff reports. Figure 4-1 shows the fluctuations in airport traffic since 1974.
Source: Jefferson city Airport historic traffic data – jefferson city
OTHER AVIATION FACILITIES
The Missouri National Guard has a small aviation facility near the Jefferson City Memorial
Airport and two heliports are located at the Missouri National Guard Ike Skelton Training Site in
eastern Jefferson City. Both the Capital Region Medical Center and St. Mary’s Hospital have
helipads for medical transport.
MODOT AND AIRPORT PLANNING
Missouri is one of ten states in the State Block Grant Program, which means that MoDOT acts on
behalf of the FAA in certain circumstances. MoDOT is the approving authority for all airport
master planning and airport layout plans for Missouri's general aviation airports.
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2017To
t
a
l
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
Airport Traffic Counts 1974-2017
Jefferson City Memorial Airport
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
66
WATERWAYS & PORTS
In FY 2011 and 2012, Missouri provided $360,000 in State Aid to Port Authorities statewide.
RIVER TRANSPORT
According to the 2018 update to MoDOT’s Long Range Transportation Plan, river transport
allows for an average of $12.5 billion in cargo annually. Freight transported this way sees an
annual growth of 1.3 percent annually and is expected to increase to $15.4 billion by 2030
which amounts to a cumulative increase of 23.1 percent or 1.1 percent annually. Missouri has
1,050 miles of navigable rivers, including 500 miles of the Mississippi River and 550 miles of the
Missouri River.
Source: MoDOT Long-Range Transportation Plan
Additionally, the state has four marine highways, as designated by the federal government.
These marine highways have received such a designation to expand freight usage and relieve
congestion and reduce carbon emissions from other transportation modes. M-70 covers the
Missouri River from Kansas City to St. Louis and is the only marine highway that runs through the
CAMPO MPA.
Two rivers in the MPA are considered to be navigable rivers, the Missouri River, and the Osage
River from river mile 0.0 to mile 81.7 (the confluence with the Missouri River upstream to the
Bagnell Dam in Miller County, Missouri). The Missouri River provides commercial waterway traffic
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
67
during an average of 8 months per year, during navigable water levels. In 2006, Missouri River
barge traffic carried 200,000 tons of cargo.
Jefferson City river freight is carried out by a private corporation, the Jefferson City River
Terminal, located at 719 Mokane Road consisting primarily of concrete products.
Representatives of the Jefferson City River Terminal estimate that a six barge tow is equivalent
to approximately 300 truckloads.
According to the 2011 Missouri River Freight Corridor Assessment and Development Plan, along
the Missouri River Corridor, “few of the existing facilities have marine infrastructure suitable to
accommodate large capacity lift machines or to support the weight and footprint associated with
cranes, truck turn around space, cargo staging area, or large material handling rolling stock.
However, “appropriate structures in good condition are presently available in the Jefferson City
and St. Joseph areas.”
A November 2010 inventory of public and private port facilities and infrastructure It was noted
in the plan that Union Pacific has a rail line, but it is on the South side of the river, while the
airport and river terminals are on the North side, so the terminals are accessible only from the
river side or by truck. Therefore, full intermodal opportunities are not being realized into each
transportation mode.
HEARTLAND PORT AUTHORITY
In the summer of 2017, the Jefferson City Area Chamber of Commerce, the counties of Cole and
Callaway, and the City of Jefferson all contributed to a port feasibility study. Noting a dearth
of port facilities along the Missouri River between Kansas City and St. Louis, the Chamber
contracted with Cambridge Systematics to conduct a two phase port feasibility study, which was
released in 2018. There are two potential sites for a port location: one is north of the Missouri
River in Callaway County and the other being on the south side of the Missouri River near the
Missouri National Guard facility off of Militia Drive in Jefferson City.
In September 2018, the Heartland Port Authority was approved by the Missouri Highways and
Transportation Commission. The Heartland Port Authority of Central Missouri Commission consists
of nine-member board - three County of Callaway officials, three County of Cole officials and
three City of Jefferson officials.
The Port Authority is currently looking for funding to build the port facility. They applied for a
Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Transportation Grant program,
which supports road, rail, transit, and port infrastructure projects across the country. The BUILD
grant is a federal grant through the federal Department of Transportation. The Port Authority
was not awarded the grant in 2018, but may look for future BUILD or related grants.
RECREATIONAL ACCESS
Public access to the Missouri River and Osage River are provided by the Missouri Department of
Conservation:
• Capital View Access in Callaway County
• Carl R. Noren Access in Callaway County
• Mari-Osa Access in Cole County
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
68
Capital Area residents and visitors do not have good access to the Missouri River from the
downtown area due to rail lines and steep terrain.
It is generally considered to be an underutilized resource for recreation and to a lesser degree
transportation.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
69
FREIGHT & INTERMODAL FACILITIES
Freight movement within the Capital Area MPO region consists primarily of truck transport or
river transport of bulk commodities. Please see Figure 5.x from the 2013 MoDOT Freight Plan to
see freight statistics in Mid-Missouri.
Source: MoDOT Frieght Plan
The MoDOT Freight Plan has specific information for the Central District, which CAMPO is
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
70
located. The above figure shows the eighteen counties that make up the district. The plan
identifies several major employers in the district, including e ABB Power, Brewer Science, State
Farm Insurance and Tracker Marine. Comments collected through public engagement include
improving connectivity throughout the district and specifically noted that improving north-south
connections, including US 63 between Jefferson City and Rolla. They also stated that the
Missouri River is underutilized and under-marketed.
For freight in general, previous stakeholder input identified several high priority deficiencies in
the regional freight environment, such as truck routing, signage, street and intersection design,
lack of supporting freight accommodations such as terminals, depots, stopping areas, and refuel
options, are items that need to be improved, according to freight representatives during public
participation and planning sessions.
Source: MoDOT
CAMPO advocates improved design of access to commercial and industrial areas, intersection
improvements, and improved directional and traffic signage throughout the MPO area.
INTERMODAL SYSTEMS
According to the Federal Highway Administration, the term "intermodal" refers to a transfer of a
shipment from one transportation mode to another as the shipment moves from origin to
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
71
destination. Intermodal facilities may move people or freight between modes such as seaports,
airports, truck/rail terminals, pipeline/truck terminals and other inter-modal freight
transportation facilities.
The CAMPO region has three inter-modal facilities located in Jefferson City: (1) the AMTRAK
station with rail and roadway connections, (2) the Jefferson City Memorial Airport, with limited
general aviation passenger services, small freight transfers, and car rental services, and (3) a
private river terminal using truck and river transport for bulk commodities.
Once constructed, the Heartland River Port would serve as a fourth intermodal facility; with
construction anticipated to be completed in the next five to ten years.
CAMPO supports creation of a regional intermodal facility that would connect truck, rail, and
river freight storage and transfer facilities. Creation of a true intermodal passenger facility is
also desired by stakeholders in the region. Connectivity between Amtrak, Airports, city transit,
and Greyhound Bus Services is lacking.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
72
RAIL
The CAMPO region has a Class I, double track line that supports both passenger and freight rail
service. A Class I railroad is a freight railroad with an operating revenue exceeding $457.9
million. The railroad is owned by Union Pacific and provides connectivity between the second
and third largest rail hubs in the nation; in Kansas City and St. Louis, respectively.
Missouri has budgeted $7,900,000 in FY 2010 for State Passenger Rail Assistance and Station
Improvements, and $8,125,000 in FY 2011 and again in FY 2012.
FREIGHT RAIL
The 2018 update of the MoDOT Long Range Transportation Plan states that 40 percent of the
freight moved in Missouri is by rail and that this percentage of freight transportation will
increase in the future. Total freight tonnage shipped in or through Missouri was 352 million tons
in 2016. Cargo shipped from Missouri elsewhere include farm products, chemicals, and motor
vehicles and parts.
Rail traffic carrying freight is generally through traffic on the Union Pacific Railroad. The main
track is a double track line with a new second bridge crossing the Moreau River, completed in
2013, and a spur line running from the Missouri Boulevard and Water Street area to just west of
MO Rt. 179/Truman Boulevard. A second branch also runs from Cole Junction Road and MO Rt.
179, while a third spur runs eastward to Militia Drive.
According to the Missouri Freight and Passenger Rail Capacity Analysis of 2007 the corridor
running through Jefferson City is handling between 50-60 trains per day which is at the upper
limits of capacity for a double track line handling the types of freight that it does. From a train
weight perspective this corridor handles a large percentage (roughly 50%) of heavy coal trains.
Recent rail improvements include a new siding near California and a second bridge over the
Osage River.
PASSENGER RAIL
Amtrak operates the only passenger rail service in Mid-Missouri, with a station located in
Jefferson City. This Amtrak service line is only one of two national passenger train routes in
Missouri, providing connections to Chicago, Los Angeles and San Antonio, and a state supported
route, the Missouri River Runner, between St. Louis and Kansas City. The Missouri River Runner
includes stops in Kirkwood, Washington, Hermann, Jefferson City, Sedalia, Warrensburg, Lee’s
Summit and Independence.
The Missouri River Runner provides two trips each day and, according to Missouri’s LRTP, had an
87 percent on-time performance in 2017. Each year, about 500,000 passengers ride Amtrak
trains in Missouri, which includes 200,000 on the state supported route. In 2017, the Missouri
River Runner provided service to approximately 171,000 passengers according to the MoDOT
Long Range Transportation Plan. Passenger rail in Missouri is seen as a growing industry for
business travelers, students and commuters alike. Given the expected population growth in some
areas, passenger rail will continue to be an important option for travelers in Missouri. Figure 5.x
depicts passenger rail service in Missouri.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
73
Figure 5.x Missouri Passenger Rail Service
Source: MoDOT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
74
TRENDS IN TRANSPORTATION
AUTOMATED VEHICLES
There have been a number of safety advancements made by automobile companies in the last
five years, but none are as likely to change the driving experience as automated vehicles. What
once seemed to come straight out of the pages of science fiction, now the likelihood of full
automation (automobiles being able to perform all driving functions) seems to be a foregone
conclusion by 2045.
This has profound implications in several arenas, such as efficient freight movement and the
reduction of fatalities on roads and highways. In a society with a majority implementation of
fully automated vehicles, crashes are likely to dramatically reduced, bringing savings from fewer
crashes and the delays that result. Another benefit is the chance for more mobility options for
those that reside in the CAMPO region.
SMART CITIES
As the global population continues to grow, so too will the number of people living in urban
areas. By 2050, the United Nations has estimated that approximately six billion people will be
living in a city. To prepare for the strain of large populations, the smart city concept was
developed. This idea focuses on people, processes, and technology. That is to say, cities and its
officials must understand who resides in the city and adopted policies to adapt to their needs.
This is followed by technology to meet these needs to improve life in those cities. Some
examples of this are electronic communications in order to finding parking, reporting nuisances
such as tall weeds or overflowing trash, and alerting drivers of traffic crashes. Future examples
may be something that resembles how the Google Glass worked, providing information in real
time on a visual display.
HYPERLOOP
The hyperloop has only emerged for discussion in the last five to seven years. Because of
limitations to high speed rail such as wind resistance and friction with rails, the concept of a
capsule moving along a tube that is partial vacuum has been proposed. Designs vary, with some
using maglev tracks and some using air pressure to levitate the capsule. Speeds could
potentially reach over 700 miles per hour, which is equal to or surpasses air flight in terms of
speed. Questions remain on a number of factors including air pressure buildup, acceleration
effects on the human body (estimated to be a factor or two above airplane take off), and the
routes.
In March 2019, the Missouri legislature formed a panel on hyperloop in Missouri. The panel is
composed of elected officials from both bodies, economic development and educational
representatives, and other private interests. The proposed route that has been reported is
between St. Louis and Kansas City, with a stop in Columbia.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
75
6 The Financial Plan &
Implementation
The financial plan demonstrates how the Metropolitan Transportation Plan
(MTP) can be implemented. This section contains system-level estimates of
costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available
to adequately operate and maintain the Federal-aid highways and public
transportation within the CAMPO region over the 25 year planning
horizon.
CAMPO works with public transportation operators, member jurisdictions,
and MoDOT to cooperatively develop estimates of funds that will be
available to support implementation of the MTP. All necessary financial
resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to
be made available to carry out the MTP are identified in this section.
The financial plan also includes recommendations on any additional
financing strategies that may be used to fund projects and programs
outlined in the MTP. In the case of new funding sources, strategies for
ensuring their availability shall be identified. The financial plan may
include an assessment of the appropriateness of innovative finance
techniques (for example, tolling, pricing, bonding, public private
partnerships, or other strategies) as revenue sources for projects in the
plan.
CAMPO has taken into account all projects and strategies proposed for
funding under title 23 U.S.C., title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or with other
Federal funds; State assistance; local sources; and private participation.
Revenue and cost estimates in this section use an inflation rate that reflects
“year of expenditure dollars,” based on information developed
cooperatively by CAMPO, MoDOT, member jurisdictions, and public
transportation operators.
The financial plan includes a list of fiscally constrained projects;
otherwise known as the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP),
for which construction or operating funds can reasonably be
expected. Additionally, an illustrative list of unconstrained
projects is also included in this section. The illustrative list includes
additional projects for which additional funding would need to be
identified. These projects have been submitted by member
jurisdictions and prioritized by the CAMPO Board of Directors.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
76
LOCAL FUNDING SOURCES
Sales taxes provide most of the transportation revenue at the local level. Local revenue sources
for operations and maintenance include state fuel tax, state vehicles sales/use tax, local sales
taxes, franchise fees, license & permit fees, property taxes, and other revenue sources that
provide significant resources for local general funds and specific funding of transportation. Not
all taxes and fees go to transportation, so the local jurisdiction usually will identify a budget
specifically for transportation purposes, such as capital improvements, Road and Bridge funds,
transit operating subsidies, road and street budgets, or operations and maintenance budgets.
Special taxing districts also exist within the CAMPO region, providing additional revenue to be
used on specific transportation needs within a designated development area.
TAXES AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS
The City of Jefferson has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a
½ cent sales tax for Parks and Recreation, which supports greenways and other non-motorized
transportation activities. Cole County has a ½ sales tax to support its Capital Improvement
Program and a real property tax levy of $0.27 earmarked for Road & Bridges. All small cities
get $100,000 every five years from Cole County. Callaway County has a real property tax
levy of $0.2466 earmarked for Road & Bridges.
Transportation Development Districts: a temporary, local, political subdivision that can be
authorized by a vote of the public or all owners of real property affected by the district to plan,
develop, finance, and levy taxes for a particular transportation project.
TIF
NDD
TDD
CID
etc
Figure 12.10 lists the sales/use tax rates for the CAMPO planning area effective April-June
2018.
Missouri Department of Revenue Sales/Use Tax Rate Table – CAMPO
10/2015 - 12/2015 (Updated 08/21/2015)
CID=Community Improvement District; TDD=Transportation Development District
City/County SALES
RATE
USE
RATE
FOOD
SALES
FOOD
USE
DOMESTIC
UTILITY
RATE
MFG
EXEMPT
RATE
CALLAWAY COUNTY 5.725% 4.225% 2.725% 1.225% 0.000% 1.500%
COLE COUNTY 5.725% 5.725% 2.725% 2.725% 0.000% 1.500%
HOLTS SUMMIT 8.725% 7.225% 5.725% 4.225% 1.000% 4.500%
JEFFERSON CITY (Callaway
County)
7.725% 4.225% 4.725% 1.225% 1.000% 3.500%
JEFFERSON CITY (Cole
County)
7.725% 5.725% 4.725% 2.725% 1.000% 3.500%
JEFFERSON CITY CAPITAL
MALL CID 8.725% 6.725% 5.725% 3.725% 1.000% 4.500%
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
77
JEFFERSON CITY
COMMONS OF HAZEL HILL TDD 8.725% 5.725% 5.725% 2.725% 1.000% 4.500%
JEFFERSON CITY STONE
RIDGE TDD 8.725% 5.725% 5.725% 2.725% 1.000% 4.500%
JEFFERSON CITY
US HIGHWAY 50/63 CITYVIEW TDD 8.725% 5.725% 5.725% 2.725% 1.000% 4.500%
ST MARTINS 6.725% 5.725% 3.725% 2.725% 0.000% 2.500%
TAOS 6.725% 5.725% 3.725% 2.725% 0.000% 2.500%
WARDSVILLE 6.725% 5.725% 3.725% 2.725% 0.000% 2.500%
Source: Missouri Department of Revenue
RAILROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY TAX
COUNTY FUNDING SOURCES
PROPERTY TAX
THE PUBLIC TRANSIT FINANCIAL PLAN - JEFFTRAN
Transit sources of revenue include local operating assistance (City of Jefferson transportation
sales tax and general sales tax), passenger fares and other revenue from contracts, state
operating grant, and FTA 5307 funding. General sales tax provides transit match
Inflation factors for total operating costs and revenues are estimated by CAMPO at 4% per
year from 2013 to 2035. For FTA 5307 funding, an estimated 4% per year inflation factor,
based on the previous year is used. For capital investment projects (5309), a 3% inflation factor
is used by JEFFTRAN for future capital investments. This inflation factor reflects year of
expenditure dollars.
The State Operating Grant is assumed to continue at the same level, through 2035, and
Passenger fares and other revenues are also held constant. Local operating assistance provides
the remaining variable. Also anticipated funding sources are the FTA 5316 Job Access and
Reverse Commute program (JARC), the FTA 5317 New Freedom program, and the FTA 5310
Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Capital Assistance program, all administered through the
MoDOT Multimodal Office.
Total planned costs and revenues from 2013 through 2035 for Transit Operation is
$52,908,694 and is previously listed in the Operations and Maintenance Section.
Anticipated Capital investments through 2035 are $18,821,305. Sources of revenue include
Local Capital Assistance (City of Jefferson transportation sales tax) FTA 5309 funding and local
private donations.
Public Transit Funding
For the Jefferson City Urbanized area, the public transit provider is JEFFTRAN, providing public
transit and paratransit services within the city limits of Jefferson, Missouri.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
78
JEFFTRAN is an agency of the City of Jefferson Missouri, supported by city taxes, fares and
contract revenues, a state operating assistance grant through the Missouri DOT, and Federal
Transit Administration operating and capital funding.
Public Transit Revenue Sources
Separating operating and capital expenses for both reporting and evaluation purposes is
common in the transit industry. Jefferson City funds operating expenditures and capital
expenditures separately, reflecting the fact that FTA has distinctly different programs and
guidelines for capital and operating grant programs.
Operating Funds
The primary sources of revenue for JEFFTRAN operations, both fixed route and paratransit, are
local funds from city general revenue and federal funding from the FTA 5307 formula program.
Operating expenses for transit are generally funded from the city’s General Fund whereas
capital projects are typically funded from the city’s Capital Improvement Fund. The FTA 5307
program includes an apportionment amount based on a formula that takes into account the
population and characteristics of the metropolitan area, as well as other factors.
JEFFTRAN receives operating funding for paratransit services through Medicaid reimbursements
and the Non-Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) program that are used for local match.
Payments from the State for the operation of the parking shuttles also represent a significant
source of revenue for JEFFTRAN operations. Fares from passengers represent a relatively small
portion of the total revenue compared with these external funding programs.
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/grant-programs/expired-grant-programs
Capital Improvement Funding
Capital improvements are typically funded from the city’s Capital Improvement Fund. These
funds are used as local match for federal capital grants. Capital projects, such as bus acquisition
and construction, can be funded through the FTA Section 5309 capital program.
MoDOT Transit Section
Formula Operating Assistance - The FTA provides formula operating assistance to transit systems
in urban areas of more than 50,000 Population. The Multimodal Operations Division includes the
Transit Section that administers this program for urban cities under 200,000 populations.
The programs administered by Multimodal Operation Division include the following:
• MEHTAP Missouri Elderly and Handicapped Transportation Assistance Program -
provides state financial assistance for public and nonprofit organizations offering
transportation services to the elderly and disabled at below-cost rates.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
79
STATE FUNDING SOURCES
STATE HIGHWAY USER REVENUES
Cities and counties within CAMPO planning area receive State Highway Revenue each year.
These revenues come from Motor Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, and Motor Vehicle Fees.
For Counties, the revenue distribution is based on the ratio of a county’s rural road mileage to
the total of county rural road mileage of the state, and the ratio of the County’s assessed total
county rural land valuation as portion of the total state rural land valuation.
For cities, a city’s share is distributed according to population, based on the ratio of the city
population to the population of all the cities in the state.
An estimated Highway User revenue stream for the life of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan,
with no inflation adjustment, totals $99,388,612. However, these highway user revenues may vary
from year to year and may be used for any purpose. The following table, Table 6-10, shows the
amount of user revenue distributed to the cities and counties for the CAMPO area, from FY
2011.
STATE FUNDING OPTIONS
Partnership Funding Programs: Programs that bring money to the project and have to be repaid.
Missouri Transportation Finance Corporation (MTFC) – A non-profit lending corporation
established to assist local transportation projects, and to administer the Statewide Transportation
Assistance Revolving Fund (STAR Fund).
Statewide Transportation Assistance Revolving Fund (STAR Fund) – State Transportation
Assistance Revolving Fund created to assist in the planning, acquisition, development and
construction of transportation facilities other than highways in the state.
State Infrastructure Bank - A state infrastructure bank (SIB) is an investment fund at the state level
with the ability to make loans and provide other forms of credit assistance to public and private
entities to carry out transportation projects.
PARTNERSHIP DEBT-FINANCING PROGRAMS
Cost Sharing Program: Projects where MoDOT commits a portion of project costs for projects
not on the department's right-of-way and construction program, but that will benefit the state
highway system.
Economic Development Program: A method of funding projects that will significantly impact the
economic development in a given area.
Transportation Corporations: specialized, temporary, private, not-for-profit corporations that
can be organized to plan, develop, and finance a particular transportation project.
Transportation Corporations accounted for $10, 528,000 in funding for MO Rt. 179 from FY
2005 to 2007.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
80
FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES
Federal transportation funding sources include grant and loan programs administered by a
handful of agencies. For the purposes of this plan, sources that cannot be used within the
CAMPO planning area have been excluded.
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) PROGRAMS
An agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA supports State and local
governments in the design, construction, and maintenance of the Nation’s highway system
(Federal Aid Highway Program) and various federally and tribal owned lands (Federal Lands
Highway Program). FHWA provides State and local governments with financial and technical
assistance.
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
The NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of the National Highway
System (NHS), for the construction of new facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that
investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support
progress toward the achievement of performance targets established in a State's asset
management plan for the NHS.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is to support a significant reduction in
traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-State-owned public
roads and roads on tribal lands
Railway-Highway Crossings (set-aside from HSIP)
This program funds safety improvements to reduce the number of fatalities, injuries, and
crashes at public grade crossings.
Transportation Alternatives (TA)
The FAST Act eliminates the MAP-21 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) and
replaces it with a set-aside of Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program
funding for transportation alternatives (TA). These set-aside funds include all projects
and activities that were previously eligible under TAP.
Recent funded projects in the CAMPO Region:
Jefferson City
Holts Summit
St. Martins
Cole County
Transportation Alternatives (TA)
The Traffic Engineering Assistance Program (TEAP) allows local public agencies (LPA) to
receive engineering assistance for studying traffic engineering problems. Typical traffic
engineering related projects include: corridor safety and/or operational analysis,
intersection(s) safety and/or operational analysis, speed limit review, sign inventory,
pedestrian/bike route analysis, parking issues, and other traffic studies, etc.
Recent funded projects in the CAMPO Region:
Jefferson City
Holts Summit
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
81
St. Martins
Cole County
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) PROGRAMS
An agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation, the FTA provides financial and technical
assistance to local public transit systems, including buses, subways, light rail, commuter rail,
trolleys and ferries. FTA also oversees safety measures and helps develop next-generation
technology research.
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
This program provides grants to Urbanized Areas (UZA) for public transportation
capital, planning, job access and reverse commute projects, as well as operating
expenses in certain circumstances.
Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons with disabilities by
providing funds for programs to serve the special needs of transit-dependent
populations beyond traditional public transportation services and Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit services.
Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas
This program provides capital, planning, and operating assistance to states to support
public transportation in rural areas with populations less than 50,000, where many
residents often rely on public transit to reach their destinations.
BUILD AMERICA BUREAU
Administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Build America Bureau serves as the
single point of contact and coordination for states, municipalities and project sponsors looking to
utilize federal transportation expertise, apply for federal transportation credit programs and
explore ways to access private capital in public private partnerships. The Bureau streamlines
credit opportunities and grants and provides access to the credit and grant programs with more
speed and transparency, while also providing technical assistance and encouraging innovative
best practices in project planning, financing, delivery, and monitoring.
Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act (TIFIA)
The TIFIA program provides credit assistance for qualified projects of regional and
national significance. Many large-scale, surface transportation projects, including
highway, transit, railroad, intermodal freight, and port access are eligible for assistance.
Eligible applicants include state and local governments, transit agencies, railroad
companies, special authorities, special districts, and private entities. The TIFIA credit
program is designed to fill market gaps and leverage substantial private co-investment
by providing supplemental and subordinate capital.
Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Grants
The INFRA program provides dedicated, discretionary funding for projects that address
critical issues facing the nation’s highways and bridges. INFRA grants support fixing the
nation’s crumbling infrastructure by creating opportunities for all levels of government
and the private sector to fund infrastructure, using innovative approaches to improve the
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
82
necessary processes for building significant projects, and increasing accountability for
the projects that are built.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
83
FISCALLY CONSTRAINED INVESTMENT PLAN
Federal funding forecasts, provided by MoDOT based on published notices in the Federal
Register, estimate fiscal year authorization levels by the FHWA and FTA under the Fixing
America's Surface Transportation Act, (FAST Act). The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP),
Appendix A, briefly describes most of the FAST Act federal transportation programs which could
fund projects in the CAMPO planning area.
For federally-funded projects, the TIP must identify the appropriate “matching funds” by source.
The matching funds are usually provided by state and local governments. State revenue
forecasts are also provided by MoDOT based on historical data of the State Fuel Tax, State
Vehicle Sales and Use Tax, and General Revenue.
AVAILABLE REVENUE 2020-2045
The following tables show forecasted revenues for jurisdictions within CAMPO.
County Aid Road Trust (State Fuel Tax and State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax)
Local revenue forecast from the County Aid Road Trust (State Fuel Tax and State Vehicle Sales
and Use Tax) for each jurisdiction are based on past distributions and are assumed to continue a
trend of a 2% inflation rate.
Callaway County Anticipated Revenue
Callaway County has a real property tax levy of $0.2466 earmarked for Road & Bridges.
Source 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Source
Source
Source
Other
Other
Total
Cole County Anticipated Revenue
Cole County has a half-cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and a
real property tax levy of $0.27 earmarked for Roads and Bridges. All small cities get
$100,000 every five years from Cole County.
Source 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Source
Source
Source
Other
Other
Total
Holts Summit Anticipated Revenue
Source 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Source
Source
Source
Other
Other
Total
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
84
Jefferson City Anticipated Revenue
The City has a ½ cent sales tax supporting a Capital Improvement Program and a ½ cent Parks
and Recreation sales tax, supporting greenways and non-motorized transportation activities.
Source 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Source
Source
Source
Other
Other
Total
JEFFTRAN Anticipated Revenue
Source 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Source
Source
Source
Other
Other
Total
OATS, Inc. Anticipated Revenue
Source 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Source
Source
Source
Other
Other
Total
St. Martins Anticipated Revenue
Source 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Source
Source
Source
Other
Other
Total
Taos Anticipated Revenue
Source 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Source
Source
Source
Other
Other
Total
Wardsville Anticipated Revenue
Source 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Source
Source
Other
Other
Total
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
85
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE 2020-2045
The following tables show forecasted revenues for jurisdictions within CAMPO.
Callaway County Anticipated Revenue
Expenditures 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Operations &
Maintenance
Capital
Projects
Total
Cole County Anticipated Revenue
Expenditures 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Operations &
Maintenance
Capital
Projects
Total
Holts Summit Anticipated Revenue
Expenditures 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Operations &
Maintenance
Capital
Projects
Total
Jefferson City Anticipated Revenue
Expenditures 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Operations &
Maintenance
Capital
Projects
Total
JEFFTRAN Anticipated Revenue
Expenditures 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Operations &
Maintenance
Capital
Projects
Total
OATS, Inc. Anticipated Revenue
Expenditures 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Operations &
Maintenance
Capital
Projects
Total
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
86
St. Martins Anticipated Revenue
Expenditures 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Operations &
Maintenance
Capital
Projects
Total
Taos Anticipated Revenue
Expenditures 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Operations &
Maintenance
Capital
Projects
Total
Wardsville Anticipated Revenue
Expenditures 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Operations &
Maintenance
Capital
Projects
Total
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
87
FISCALLY CONSTRAINED PROJECTS
Projects listed in the table includes projects that the sponsor jurisdiction can show a reasonable
expectation to fund based on previous funding history. Any projects for which there is no
reasonable expectation of funding are included in the Illustrative Projects. – SEMPO
This section identifies a list of regional projects that improve transportation for both people and
goods. This list of projects is intended to help the region identify and prioritize future
transportation investments based on goals, strategies and estimated financial resources. The
project list was developed and prioritized using the “3 C” approach (Comprehensive,
Cooperative, Continuing) involving regional stakeholders, the general public, and the CAMPO
Board of Directors and Technical Committee.
Description of fiscally constrained and unconstrained project lists
“Financial Plan” Requirements.
(iv) In developing the financial plan, the MPO(s) shall take into account all projects and
strategies proposed for funding under title 23 U.S.C., title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or with other
Federal funds; State assistance; local sources; and private participation. Revenue and cost
estimates that support the metropolitan transportation plan must use an inflation rate(s) to
reflect “year of expenditure dollars,” based on reasonable financial principles and information,
developed cooperatively by the MPO(s), State(s), and public transportation operator(s).
(v) For the outer years of the metropolitan transportation plan (i.e., beyond the first 10
years), the financial plan may reflect aggregate cost ranges/cost bands, as long as the future
funding source(s) is reasonably expected to be available to support the projected cost
ranges/cost bands.
(vi) For nonattainment and maintenance areas, the financial plan shall address the specific
financial strategies required to ensure the implementation of TCMs in the applicable SIP.
(vii) For illustrative purposes, the financial plan may include additional projects that would
be included in the adopted transportation plan if additional resources beyond those identified in
the financial plan were to become available.
(viii) In cases that the FHWA and the FTA find a metropolitan transportation plan to be
fiscally constrained and a revenue source is subsequently removed or substantially reduced
(i.e., by legislative or administrative actions), the FHWA and the FTA will not withdraw the
original determination of fiscal constraint; however, in such cases, the FHWA and the FTA will
not act on an updated or amended metropolitan transportation plan that does not reflect the
changed revenue situation.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
88
THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)
The TIP, located in Appendix A, stands as the “Fiscally Constrained” list of the first five years of
the Metropolitan Transportation Plan’s Financial Plan. Developed in accordance with federal
regulations CFR §450.324, the TIP is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be
implemented within the MPA, which are funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed ‘regionally significant.’ Each project or
project phase included in the TIP is to be derived from the MTP and is part of the process of
applying for funds from the FHWA and FTA. Certain capital and non-capital transportation
projects using funding under 23 USC and 49 USC Chapter 53 or regionally significant projects
requiring action by the FHWA or the FTA are required to be included in the TIP and derived
from the MTP. The TIP is developed in cooperation with the MoDOT, local jurisdictions, and
public transportation operators.
FISCALLY CONSTRAINED PROJECTS
§450.324 (g)(9) Design concept and design scope descriptions of all existing and
proposed transportation facilities in sufficient detail, regardless of funding source, in
nonattainment and maintenance areas for conformity determinations under the EPA's
transportation conformity regulations (40 CFR part 93, subpart A). In all areas (regardless of
air quality designation), all proposed improvements shall be described in sufficient detail
to develop cost estimates;
Federal planning regulations (CFR §450.322) state that “For the purpose of developing the metropolitan
transportation plan, the MPO, public transportation operator(s), and State shall cooperatively develop
estimates of funds that will be available to support metropolitan transportation plan implementation.” The
regulations also indicate “for illustrative purposes, the financial plan may (but is not required to) include
additional projects that would be included in the adopted transportation plan if additional resources
beyond those identified in the financial plan were to become available.” The CAMPO 2040 MTP includes
lists of both fiscally constrained and unconstrained projects. The CAMPO Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP), found in Appendix A, contains CAMPO’s fiscally constrained list of projects.
The following list of unconstrained projects includes regional needs that have been identified and
prioritized in the event more funding were to become available.
TIP PROJECT SELECTION
Projects are identified by the agency having jurisdiction over the project using their own criteria
and are submitted to the CAMPO Board of Directors for approval before being included in the
TIP. The Board of Directors approves projects based on their consistency with the goals and
strategies outlined in the MTP. A more detailed description of the TIP application process is
located in Appendix A.
ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS (FISCALLY CONSTRAINED)
This section will be those items that are identified in the sales tax.
• Cole County
• Callaway County
• Jefferson City
• JEFFTRAN POP
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
89
ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS
For illustrative purposes, the financial plan includes additional projects that could be completed if additional resources beyond those
identified in the financial plan were to become available.
The following lists contain both site specific projects and programmatic projects that have been
identified as needs within the CAMPO region. The site specific projects have been prioritized by
the CAMPO board of directors based on the following factors:
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION
Reviewed by workgroup, Technical Committee and Board of Directors…
Annually reviewed…
Tier 1
Regionally Significant
High Priority – Board approved top #3 in 2018
Supported by TDM
Supports increased capacity or improves safety
Tier 2
High Priority for Stakeholders and Work Group
Most are supported by TDM
Supports increased system performance or improves safety
Tier 3
Designated by stakeholders as a need
May be supported by TDM
May be completed in phases
Supports increased system performance or improves safety
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
90
DRAFT
Ref#Tier Term
Cost
Range
City/
County
On State-
System Location Project
1 1
Long-Term
10 years<$10M<
Jefferson
City Yes US 54 / 63 / 94 (Bluff Rd)
Construct direct connector for northbound-to-westbound movement to improve capacity; widen US
54/63 to provide 3 continuous through lanes in each direction (in addition to auxiliary/accel/decel
lanes)
2 1
Long-Term
10 years<$10M<
Jefferson
City Yes US 50/63, US 54 to Lafayette St
Implement major capacity improvements, which could include mainline widening, grade separations,
and/or outer roads
3 1
Long-Term
10 years<$5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes US 50 / 63 /54 (Tri-Level)Reconfigure interchange to provide non-conflicting system-to-system movements
4 2
Long-Term
10 years<$1M-$5M
Callaway
County Yes US 54 / S. Summit Dr. Ramps Addition of ramps to westbound and eastbound US 54 completing the S. Summit Dr. overpass
5 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes US 50 / Dix Rd
Reconfigure interchange and Dix Rd approaches to address capacity issues including lack of left-turn
lanes; consider dumbbell roundabout interchange; widen Dix Rd to provide center turn lane and
pedestrian access from US 50 to Missouri Blvd
6 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $500k-$5M
Jefferson
City No West Edgewood @ Stadium Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity
7 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes
Missouri Blvd, Eastern Lowe's
entrance to S 10 Mile Dr
Address access management along the corridor, including turn restrictions, additional traffic control,
and safety.
8 2
Near-Term
5-10 years < $500k
Jefferson
City No
W. Truman Blvd / Scott Station
Rd Signalize or otherwise enhance capacity
9 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes
US-54 NB Ramps / Christy Dr /
Stadium / Jefferson St Install roundabous at both hook ramp intersections to improve operations and address offsets/angles
12 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M Wardsville Yes
Route B, Ashbury Way to Route
M Install roundabout at Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury and intersection improvment to Routes B/ M/ W.
13 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes US 54 / Ellis Bl / Southwest Bl
Reconfigure interchange to address capacity and close spacing of outer roads. Create a pedestrian
connection along Southwest Bl / Ellis Bl from Ford St to Southridge Dr
14 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $500k-$5M
Jefferson
City No Southwest Blvd @ Stadium Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity
15 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $500k-$5M
Jefferson
City No Ellis Bl / Green Berry Rd Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity
16 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $500k-$5M
Jefferson
City No Bald Hill Rd / Seven Hills Rd Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity
17 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes
US 50 / Truman Bl / Country
Club Dr
Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road spacing; widen westbound off-ramp to improve
capacity; incorporate pedestrian facilities into the interchange
21 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $500k-$5M
Jefferson
City No West Edgewood @ Creek Trail Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity
22 2
Long-Term
10 years<$5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes
Missouri Blvd, Country Club Dr
to
Howerton Ct Widen to 5 lanes; including right turn lane at Howerton Ct.
23 2
Long-Term
10 years<$1M-$5M
Jefferson
City No
Country Club Dr, Truman Bl to
Rainbow Dr Widen to provide left-turn lanes at existing and future access points
25 2
Long-Term
10 years<$5M-$10M
Holts
Summit Yes US 54 / Route OO / Simon Bl
Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road spacing and capacity issues (may involve
roundabouts); incorporate pedestrian facilities crossing US 54
26 2
Long-Term
10 years<$5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes
Missouri Blvd, Stoneridge Pkwy
to US 50
Impove access management along Missouri Bld, including improvments to intersections, restrictions
to turning movements. and improvemnts to pedestrian safety
29 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Jefferson
City No
Madison Street, Dunklin St to
US-54 Ramps
Add a center turn lane via a combination of widening and parking removal; address unusual stop
control configuration at Madison Atchison
30 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes US 50/63 / Clark Ave
Reconfigure interchange to address ramp terminal capacity (likely roundabouts); include
modifications to Clark/Miller and Clark/Dunklin intersections to improve corridor operations
31 3
Long-Term
10 years<$1M-$10M
Holts
Summit Yes US 54 / Center St Improve interchange capacity and east-side outer road spacing with roundabouts at terminals
32 3
Long-Term
10 years<$1M-$5M
Cole
County No
Rock Ridge Rd / Wildwood Dr
extension Add left-turn lane on Rock Ridge to improve capacity after completion of extension
33 3
Long-Term
10 years<$500k-$5M
Jefferson
City Yes MO 179, Industrial Dr to Sue Dr Add left-turn lanes at Sue Dr, Cherry Creek Ct, and Fire Station north driveway
34 3
Long-Term
10 years<<Null>
Jefferson
City Yes MO 179 and Truman Blvd Intersection Improvements, poosbile installation of round
35 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Cole
County No
Bridge Replacement / Tanner
Bridge Rd Bridge Replacement on Tanner Bridge Rd. over Moreau River
36 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M Wardsville Yes
Route B, Tanner Bridge Rd to
Friendship Rd
Install roundabouts at two locations to improve capacity: Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury, Rte B / Rte M;
widen to four lanes in each direction on Rte B for several hundred feet south of Tanner Bridge Rd and
reconfigure intersection; Widen Rte B to provide TWLTL
39 3
Long-Term
10 years<
Jefferson
City No Swifts Hwy / Jefferson St Reconfigure to fix sight distance issues; widen Swifts Hwy approach
40 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No
S. Summit Dr / Perrey Dr /
Hibernia Ln / Holt Ln Redesign intersection to address offset and sight distance
41 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No Spalding Rd/ Park
Install drainage improvements. Curb and gutter could cause surface flooding for adjoining
properties.
42 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No
N. Summit Dr and Mars St
Intersection Install drainage improvements – box culvert.
43 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No Van Horn Rd / Julie Ln Redesign intersection to address offset and sight distance
47 3
Near-Term
5-10 years St. Martins Yes
Route T/D & Bus 50 W
Intersection Reconfigure intersection with roundabout
48 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No
Nieman Rd / Halifax Rd / Major
Terr Address offset and skew by installing roundabout or realigning east leg
49 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No
E Simon Blvd, ~0.4 mi east of
Jefferson Rd Replace undersized culvert. Install new bridge
Road and Bridge (System Performance/Drainage/Safety)
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
91
Figure 6.x Illustrative Projects – Road and Bridge
Source: CAMPO
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
92
DRAFT
Figure 6.x Illustrative Projects – Multi-Modal
Source: CAMPO
Ref#Tier Term
Cost
Range
City/
County
On State-
System Location Project
18 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M
Jefferson
City No JEFFTRAN Transit Facility
Construction of a new transit facility for JEFFTRAN that would provide better accommodations for
transit riders, JEFFTRAN staff, and possible future service expansion
19 2
Long-Term
10 years<
Jefferson
City No Jefferson City Amtrak Station Renovation or replacement of the Amtrak Train Station in Jefferson City
20 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $10M<
Jefferson
City/
Cole
County/
Callaway
County No Missouri River Port
Construction of a port facility in either Callaway County or Cole County as specified in the Central
Missouri Multimodal Port Feasibility Study.
27 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Jefferson
City No Jefferson City Memorial Airport Reconstruction of Runway 9/27
28 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Jefferson
City No Jefferson City Memorial Airport Construction of new air traffic control tower.
37 3
Long-Term
10 years<$5M-$10M
Jefferson
City No
Jefferson City Memorial Airport
- Runway 9 and 9/27 Relocate Runway 9 and Extend Runway 9/27 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport.
38 3
Long-Term
10 years<$10M<
Jefferson
City No
Jefferson City Memorial Airport
- Runway 12/30 Extension and Widening of runway 12/30 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport.
Multi-Modal
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
93
Figure 6.x Illustrative Projects – Pedestrian and Non-Motorized
Source: CAMPO
Ref#Tier Term
Cost
Range
City/
County
On State-
System Location Project
10 2
Long-Term
10 years<
Holts
Summit No
S. Summit Drive, Simon to
Center Install sidewalks with some curb and gutter and drop inlets
11 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Jefferson
City Yes
Missouri Blvd, W. Main St. to
Stadium Blvd.
Complete connectivity between segments of sidewalk and install crosswalks/pedestrian refuges as
needed.
24 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Jefferson
City No Bolivar St. Greenway Design and construct a greenway extension from the Dunklin St. Trailhead to McCarty St.
44 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Jefferson
City No
Southwest Blvd & Dix Rd
Intersection Install pedestrian-activated beacon or similar warning device
45 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Jefferson
City No
Dix Road, W. Main to Missouri
Bl Improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the corridor
46 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M
St.
Martins/
Cole
County Yes Route T, Bus 50 to Elston Install shoulders to accomodate cyclists and pedestrians.
50 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $500K-$1M
Holts
Summit No Karen Dr, Center to Thompson Install sidewalk and crosswalks
51 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $500K-$1M
Holts
Summit No Halifax Rd, Center to Nieman Install sidewalk and crosswalks
52 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
St.
Martins/
Cole
County Yes
Route T, Henwick Ln to Bus 50
W Install curb, gutter & sidewalk in each direction
53 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $50K-$100k CAMPO No
Bike lane installation in CAMPO
Region Continue expansion of bike lanes in the downtown area.
54 3
Long-Term
10 years<$10M<CAMPO No CAMPO Greenway Connectivity Continue to expand greenways to connect cities in the CAMPO Region
55 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $50k-$1M
Jefferson
City No
Jefferson City Greenway
Projects
Locations may include; Fairgrounds Acres to County Park, South Country Club Drive to Turtle Creek
subdivision, Ellis-Porter Riverside Park connector from St. Louis Road, Wears Creek to East Branch
Connector, Frog Hollow Phase 4, Creek Trail to W. Edgewood, JCMG to Satinwood, Dunklin to W. Main
via Bolivar, Aurora Park to Ellis Blvd
56 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Jefferson
City Yes
Missouri Blvd and S. Ten MIle,
Stoneridge Pkwy to S. Country
Club
Install Sidewalks and crosswalks along route with pedestrian accesss over MO 179 provided via a
pedestrian bridge connecting S. Ten Mile east and west segments
Pedestrian & Non-Motorized Enhancments and Safety Improvements
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
94
PROGRAMMATIC PROJECT LIST
Programmatic Illustrative Projects
FUTURE ROADS
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
95
Public Participation Plan
Limited English Proficiency Plan
Title VI Plan
IMPLEMENTATION
CAMPO actively plans for and facilitates improvements to the region’s transportation system
through an inclusive process, which includes the general public, city and county leaders, regional
stakeholders, and the Technical Committee and Board of Directors. The Vision, Goals, and
Strategies outlined in Section 2 guide implementation activities and play an integral role in the
development of required plans and documents as outlined below.
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM (UPWP)
The UPWP in updated annually and includes a detailed budget and description of tasks and
activities that CAMPO will work on during that period. The tasks and activities outline in the
UPWP are directly guided by the goals and strategies outlined in the MTP. These tasks and
activities are integral to CAMPO providing service to member communities and to the continued
success of the planning process and state wide planning framework.
Metropolitan
Transportation
Plan
Priorities
(Projects and Strategies)
Transportation
Improvement
Program
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
96
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)
As stated previously in this section, the annually updated TIP is a 5-year financial program of
transportation projects to be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area. Projects in the
TIP are consistent with strategies discussed in the MTP and are developed in cooperation with the
MoDOT, local jurisdictions, and public transportation operators. Projects outlined in the TIP
constitute the first five years of fiscally constrained projects to be implemented in the CAMPO
MPA. The TIP is located in Appendix A.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN (PPP), LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY PLAN (LEP), &
TITLE VI PLAN
The development of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond MTP and subsequent Implementation Plan is
consistent with the PPP. CAMPO is required to seek input from the public and stakeholders in the
development of all planning documents. This process is outlined in the PPP and reflected in the
strategies laid out in the LEP and Title VI Plan. As stipulated in the PPP, CAMPO provides the
following groups a reasonable opportunity to comment on the transportation plan:
• individuals
• affected public agencies
• representatives of public transportation employees
• public ports, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services
• private and public transportations providers and their representatives
• representatives of users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities
• representatives of the disabled
• any other interested parties
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
97
IMPLEMENTATION OF STRATEGIES
The goals and strategies listed below re-iterates those outlined in Section 2, and includes a
schedule for addressing the strategies over the next five years. As strategies are implemented
and funding is made available strategies or projects may be programed into the UPWP or TIP.
After being reviewed by stakeholders, public, and the CAMPO Technical Committee the CAMPO
2045 strategies were categorized as follows:
Ongoing Strategies that are currently activities that CAMPO is currently working on.
Short Range Strategies that CAMPO will work toward addressing in the next 1-2 years.
Long Range Strategies that CAMPO will work toward addressing in the next 3-5 years.
1. Improve safety and security for all travel modes
a. Identify locations for safety improvements Short Range
b. Improve collaboration between CAMPO and public safety agencies Short Range
c. Assist with railroad related safety and access improvements such as the boarding
platform, crossings, and right-of-way areas Long Range
d. Encourage collaboration between law enforcement and transit agencies concerning
security camera use Short Range
2. Support economic development and tourism throughout the region
a. Seek funding and provide support for improvements and access to the airport, transit,
and the river port Long Range
b. Improve accessibility to recreational and cultural opportunities Long Range
c. Expanding wayfinding throughout the region Long Range
d. Support creation of shuttle services for local and regional events Short Range
3. Support regional partnerships and planning continuity across the region.
a. Develop data in support of member jurisdictions’ comprehensive plans Ongoing
b. Provide a forum for sharing planning best practices or processes Ongoing
c. Strengthen collaboration with regional planning agencies Ongoing
4. Improve efficiency in system management, operations, and movement of people and freight
a. Maintain and update a regional travel demand model Long Range
b. Support access management programs Long Range
c. Identify current or potential congestion locations or bottlenecks Short Range
d. Identify potential locations for connection improvements Short Range
e. Improve existing inter-modal and multi-modal facilities Long Range
f. Support improvements to freight and people movement via rail, air, and river port
access Long Range
g. Improve inter-city and inter-regional transit operations and connectivity Long Range
h. Improve parking and services specific to freight hauler needs Long Range
i. Support development and implementation of local parking studies Short Range
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
98
5. Support land use practices that promote quality of life and economic vitality
a. Develop and maintain land use data in support of MPO and regional planning
partner needs Ongoing
b. Support member jurisdictions’ plans for connectivity to parks, trails, and open space Ongoing
c. Provide mapping and data development support to local communities Ongoing
6. Seek secure and reliable funding
a. Provide assistance to regional stakeholders in seeking grants and completing
applications Ongoing
b. Maintain a prioritized comprehensive list of illustrative transportation projects Ongoing
c. Continue to maintain a Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Ongoing
d. Maintain a list of funding sources and opportunities Ongoing
e. Alert member jurisdictions of available funding resources as they are announced Ongoing
f. Collaborate with regional partners in leveraging funds or applying for grants Ongoing
7. Improve accessibility and mobility
a. Identify barriers to accessibility and mobility (sidewalks, crosswalks, signals, signage,
etc.) Short Range
b. Support development of ADA transition plans among member jurisdictions Short Range
c. Support improvements to and expansion of passenger rail service Long Range
d. Maintain and update the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Long Range
e. Maintain and update the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation
Plan Long Range
f. Review and update documents that support improvements to accessibility such as the
Title VI Plan, Limited English Proficiency Plan (LEP), and Public Participation Plan (PPP) Short Range
8. Maintain a resilient transportation system
a. Encourage preservation of motorized and non-motorized transportation corridors for
future growth Short Range
b. Maintain a database of existing infrastructure and assets for use by regional
partners Ongoing
c. Develop and maintain an accurate Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Ongoing
d. Provide support in maintaining the MoDOT Transportation Management System (TMS) Ongoing
e. Support implementation of individual or collaborative pavement and bridge
management systems Short Range
f. Maintain an updated performance management plan Short Range
9. Provide a platform for multi-modal transportation education
a. Facilitate, promote and participate in local and regional educational activities Ongoing
b. Develop and disseminate educational tools and resources such as brochures, maps,
videos, and other media Ongoing
c. Maintain a consistent public outreach schedule to keep members, planning partners,
and the public informed about new innovations or transportation trends Ongoing
d. Strengthen CAMPO’s social media presence Ongoing
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN -DRAFT
99
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN 2020 – TO BE COMPLETED
CAMPO currently depends on the County-Wide Transportation Study for Cole County and the
Thoroughfare Plan for Jefferson City to illustrate an adopted future road network. After
completion and adoption of the CAMPO 2045 MTP staff will undertake the task of creating a
Major Thoroughfare Plan for the CAMPO Region as a whole.
The CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan will provide an indication of the general locations and capacities
needed to meet the future needs of the CAMPO Region. The new plan will incorporate products
from the Cole County and Jefferson City plans as well as the completed Travel Demand Model
and any other pertinent recommendations from other local and regional plans.
The Plan will act as a guide for both municipalities and the private sector in making future
decisions involving new or existing roadways and will include future and current roadway
functional classifications.
Ideally, the CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan will:
• Provide for the efficient movement of vehicular traffic into and throughout the Region.
• Identify the right-of-way needs to be dedicated to accommodate a proposed
thoroughfare.
• Ensure adequate roadways to serve existing and proposed developments.
• Assist in identifying Capital Improvement Program needs
• Reduce the traffic volumes in residential areas by ensuring adequate arterials.
• Serve as a planning tool and assist coordination with other agencies.
The Thoroughfare Plan will be located in the Appendices once adopted by the CAMPO Board of
Directors.
CAPITAL AREA PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PLAN
The Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan is intended as a resource to improve safety,
connectivity, and mobility for pedestrian and bicycle users in the CAMPO region. The goals and
strategies outlined in the plan can be used by jurisdictions to develop an individualized
implementation strategy to fit the unique pedestrian and bicycle needs of that community.
The implementation section of the plan lays out a strategy for the CAMPO region to achieve the
goals and objectives of the plan. Included, are strategies, performance measures, and timelines
to guide and track the implementation process. Also included, is an illustrative list of projects and
a list of funding options that can be used to support these items.
It is important to reiterate the role of CAMPO in the implementation of the Capital Area
Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan. Although the CAMPO region includes six incorporated communities
and portions of two counties, it has no direct influence over any jurisdiction within its borders.
However, CAMPO can assist local jurisdictions with developing a community specific
implementation strategy referencing the goals and recommendations laid out in this plan. It is
the jurisdictions responsibility to implement the plan. The Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle
Plan can be found in Appendix B.
APPENDICES
Appendix A
2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program
Appendix B
2016 Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan
Appendix C
2017 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan
Appendix D
Travel Demand Model Report
Appendix E
System Performance Report
Appendix F
MTP Planning Requirements - §450.324 CFR
Appendix G
CAMPO Wayfinding Plan
Appendix H
CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan
The CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan is currently under development. It is anticipated that the plan will be completed in
early 2020 as identified in the FY2020 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
Appendix I
Amendments and Modifications
AMENDMENTS & MODIFICATIONS
The MTP is updated every five years. Between updates the MTP may be changed through an amendment or
administrative modification. An amendment to the MTP is subject to a 7-day public comment period after being
reviewed by the Technical Committee and before being approved by the Board of Directors. If staff conducts an
administrative modification, notice will be provided to the Board of Directors either prior to or immediately
following the modification. Appendix H contains a list of amendments and administrative modifications.
Definitions of an amendment or administrative modification, according to 23 CFR §450.104, are as follows:
Administrative modification means a minor revision to a long-range statewide or metropolitan
transportation plan, Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), or Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) that includes minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to funding
sources of previously included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation dates. An
administrative modification is a revision that does not require public review and comment, a
redemonstration of fiscal constraint, or a conformity determination (in nonattainment and maintenance
areas).
Amendment means a revision to a long-range statewide or metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, or STIP
that involves a major change to a project included in a metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, or STIP,
including the addition or deletion of a project or a major change in project cost, project/project phase
initiation dates, or a major change in design concept or design scope (e.g., changing project termini or the
number of through traffic lanes or changing the number of stations in the case of fixed guideway transit
projects). Changes to projects that are included only for illustrative purposes do not require an amendment.
An amendment is a revision that requires public review and comment and a redemonstration of fiscal
constraint. If an amendment involves “non-exempt” projects in nonattainment and maintenance areas, a
conformity determination is required.
Key words to search for in text:
LRTP
MTP
MPO
CAMPO
Capital Area
Advocates
Figure
Section
Chart
Chapter
Jefferson
Mykee
Appendix
Website
Illustrative List Items:
Rail - CAMPO advocates improved station, services, and facilities at the Jefferson City AMTRAK station, with
potential intermodal connections for transit and public transport, waiting and pickup accommodations and higher
levels of amenities.
https://unsplash.com/license
License
All photos published on Unsplash can be used for free. You can use them for commercial and noncommercial
purposes. You do not need to ask permission from or provide credit to the photographer or Unsplash, although it is
appreciated when possible.
More precisely, Unsplash grants you an irrevocable, nonexclusive copyright license to download, copy, modify,
distribute, perform, and use photos from Unsplash for free, including for commercial purposes, without permission
from or attributing the photographer or Unsplash. This license does not include the right to compile photos from
Unsplash to replicate a similar or competing service.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow
three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Illustrative List – CAMPO 2045 MTP
April 4, 2019
Summary
This Illustrative List includes projects that have been identified as needs in the region that, given funding, may be
completed in the next 10 to 25 years. This list is included in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) in the
implementation section. Items on the list may be implemented as funding is made available. MoDOT and other
agencies frequently request this list in the development of statewide programming. Applications for grant funding
usually require projects to be included on this list in order to be eligible for funding.
Projects on the list stem from public comments, stakeholder comments, or were identified by the travel demand model.
Public meetings held in October of 2018 and March of 2019 garnered several public comments about transportation
needs in the region. Most of these comments are covered by projects included in the previous illustrative list from
2013 or have been identified by stakeholders and public comment during planning processes since then.
March 16 Work Group Meeting
A work group meeting was held March 26th to review and prioritize projects to be included in the 2045 MTP
Illustrative List. The meeting was attended by a subset of the Technical Committee or Board of Directors. Attendees
reviewed each individual project, identified new projects, and categorized and prioritized the projects based on a four
tier system. After staff reviewed projects further and factored in discussion at the March 26 meeting a decision was
made to combine tiers 3 and 4. The criteria for the tiers is outlined below.
Tier 1
Regionally Significant
High Priority – Board approved top #3 in 2018
Supported by TDM
Supports increased capacity or improves safety
Tier 2
High Priority for Stakeholders and Work Group
Most are supported by TDM
Supports increased system performance or improves safety
Tier 3
Designated by stakeholders as a need
May be supported by TDM
May be completed in phases
Supports increased system performance or improves safety
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that technical committee members review the illustrative list and forward it to the Board of
Directors for their review and approval.
Agenda Item 7A
Ref#Tier Term
Cost
Range
City/
County
On State-
System Location Project
1 1
Long-Term
10 years<$10M<
Jefferson
City Yes US 54 / 63 / 94 (Bluff Rd)
Construct direct connector for northbound-to-westbound movement to improve capacity; widen US 54/63 to
provide 3 continuous through lanes in each direction (in addition to auxiliary/accel/decel lanes)
2 1
Long-Term
10 years<$10M<
Jefferson
City Yes US 50/63, US 54 to Lafayette St
Implement major capacity improvements, which could include mainline widening, grade separations, and/or
outer roads
3 1
Long-Term
10 years<$5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes US 50 / 63 /54 (Tri-Level)Reconfigure interchange to provide non-conflicting system-to-system movements
4 2
Long-Term
10 years<$1M-$5M
Callaway
County Yes US 54 / S. Summit Dr. Ramps Addition of ramps to westbound and eastbound US 54 completing the S. Summit Dr. overpass
5 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes US 50 / Dix Rd
Reconfigure interchange and Dix Rd approaches to address capacity issues including lack of left-turn lanes;
consider dumbbell roundabout interchange; widen Dix Rd to provide center turn lane and pedestrian access from
US 50 to Missouri Blvd
6 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $500k-$5M
Jefferson
City No West Edgewood @ Stadium Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity
7 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes
Missouri Blvd, Eastern Lowe's
entrance to S 10 Mile Dr Address access management along the corridor, including turn restrictions, additional traffic control, and safety.
8 2
Near-Term
5-10 years < $500k
Jefferson
City No W. Truman Blvd / Scott Station Rd Signalize or otherwise enhance capacity
9 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes
US-54 NB Ramps / Christy Dr /
Stadium / Jefferson St Install roundabous at both hook ramp intersections to improve operations and address offsets/angles
12 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M Wardsville Yes Route B, Ashbury Way to Route M Install roundabout at Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury and intersection improvment to Routes B/ M/ W.
13 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes US 54 / Ellis Bl / Southwest Bl
Reconfigure interchange to address capacity and close spacing of outer roads. Create a pedestrian connection
along Southwest Bl / Ellis Bl from Ford St to Southridge Dr
14 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $500k-$5M
Jefferson
City No Southwest Blvd @ Stadium Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity
15 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $500k-$5M
Jefferson
City No Ellis Bl / Green Berry Rd Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity
16 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $500k-$5M
Jefferson
City No Bald Hill Rd / Seven Hills Rd Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity
17 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes
US 50 / Truman Bl / Country Club
Dr
Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road spacing; widen westbound off-ramp to improve capacity;
incorporate pedestrian facilities into the interchange
21 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $500k-$5M
Jefferson
City No West Edgewood @ Creek Trail Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity
22 2
Long-Term
10 years<$5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes
Missouri Blvd, Country Club Dr to
Howerton Ct Widen to 5 lanes; including right turn lane at Howerton Ct.
23 2
Long-Term
10 years<$1M-$5M
Jefferson
City No
Country Club Dr, Truman Bl to
Rainbow Dr Widen to provide left-turn lanes at existing and future access points
25 2
Long-Term
10 years<$5M-$10M
Holts
Summit Yes US 54 / Route OO / Simon Bl
Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road spacing and capacity issues (may involve roundabouts);
incorporate pedestrian facilities crossing US 54
26 2
Long-Term
10 years<$5M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes
Missouri Blvd, Stoneridge Pkwy to
US 50
Impove access management along Missouri Bld, including improvments to intersections, restrictions to turning
movements. and improvemnts to pedestrian safety
29 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Jefferson
City No
Madison Street, Dunklin St to
US-54 Ramps
Add a center turn lane via a combination of widening and parking removal; address unusual stop control
configuration at Madison Atchison
30 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$10M
Jefferson
City Yes US 50/63 / Clark Ave
Reconfigure interchange to address ramp terminal capacity (likely roundabouts); include modifications to
Clark/Miller and Clark/Dunklin intersections to improve corridor operations
31 3
Long-Term
10 years<$1M-$10M
Holts
Summit Yes US 54 / Center St Improve interchange capacity and east-side outer road spacing with roundabouts at terminals
32 3
Long-Term
10 years<$1M-$5M Cole County No
Rock Ridge Rd / Wildwood Dr
extension Add left-turn lane on Rock Ridge to improve capacity after completion of extension
33 3
Long-Term
10 years<$500k-$5M
Jefferson
City Yes MO 179, Industrial Dr to Sue Dr Add left-turn lanes at Sue Dr, Cherry Creek Ct, and Fire Station north driveway
34 3
Long-Term
10 years<<Null>
Jefferson
City Yes MO 179 and Truman Blvd Intersection Improvement
35 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M Cole County No
Bridge Replacement / Tanner
Bridge Rd Bridge Replacement on Tanner Bridge Rd. over Moreau River
36 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M Wardsville Yes
Route B, Tanner Bridge Rd to
Friendship Rd
Install roundabouts at two locations to improve capacity: Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury, Rte B / Rte M; widen to four
lanes in each direction on Rte B for several hundred feet south of Tanner Bridge Rd and reconfigure intersection;
Widen Rte B to provide TWLTL
39 3
Long-Term
10 years<
Jefferson
City No Swifts Hwy / Jefferson St Reconfigure to fix sight distance issues; widen Swifts Hwy approach
40 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No
S. Summit Dr / Perrey Dr / Hibernia
Ln / Holt Ln Redesign intersection to address offset and sight distance
41 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No Spalding Rd/ Park Install drainage improvements. Curb and gutter could cause surface flooding for adjoining properties.
42 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No
N. Summit Dr and Mars St
Intersection Install drainage improvements – box culvert.
43 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No Van Horn Rd / Julie Ln Redesign intersection to address offset and sight distance
47 3
Near-Term
5-10 years St. Martins Yes Route T/D & Bus 50 W Intersection Reconfigure intersection with roundabout
48 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No
Nieman Rd / Halifax Rd / Major
Terr Address offset and skew by installing roundabout or realigning east leg
49 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Holts
Summit No
E Simon Blvd, ~0.4 mi east of
Jefferson Rd Replace undersized culvert. Install new bridge
Road and Bridge (System Performance/Drainage/Safety)
CAMPO 2045 MTP
Illustrative List
DRAFT
Ref#Tier Term
Cost
Range
City/
County
On State-
System Location Project
18 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M
Jefferson
City No JEFFTRAN Transit Facility
Construction of a new transit facility for JEFFTRAN that would provide better accommodations for transit riders,
JEFFTRAN staff, and possible future service expansion
19 2
Long-Term
10 years<
Jefferson
City No Jefferson City Amtrak Station Renovation or replacement of the Amtrak Train Station in Jefferson City
20 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $10M<
Jefferson
City/
Cole
County/
Callaway
County No Missouri River Port
Construction of a port facility in either Callaway County or Cole County as specified in the Central Missouri
Multimodal Port Feasibility Study.
27 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Jefferson
City No Jefferson City Memorial Airport Reconstruction of Runway 9/27
28 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Jefferson
City No Jefferson City Memorial Airport Construction of new air traffic control tower.
37 3
Long-Term
10 years<$5M-$10M
Jefferson
City No
Jefferson City Memorial Airport -
Runway 9 and 9/27 Relocate Runway 9 and Extend Runway 9/27 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport.
38 3
Long-Term
10 years<$10M<
Jefferson
City No
Jefferson City Memorial Airport -
Runway 12/30 Extension and Widening of runway 12/30 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport.
Ref#Tier Term
Cost
Range
City/
County
On State-
System Location Project
10 2
Long-Term
10 years<
Holts
Summit No S. Summit Drive, Simon to Center Install sidewalks with some curb and gutter and drop inlets
11 2
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Jefferson
City Yes
Missouri Blvd, W. Main St. to
Stadium Blvd.Complete connectivity between segments of sidewalk and install crosswalks/pedestrian refuges as needed.
24 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Jefferson
City No Bolivar St. Greenway Design and construct a greenway extension from the Dunklin St. Trailhead to McCarty St.
44 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Jefferson
City No
Southwest Blvd & Dix Rd
Intersection Install pedestrian-activated beacon or similar warning device
45 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
Jefferson
City No Dix Road, W. Main to Missouri Bl Improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the corridor
46 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $5M-$10M
St. Martins/
Cole County Yes Route T, Bus 50 to Elston Install shoulders to accomodate cyclists and pedestrians.
50 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $500K-$1M
Holts
Summit No Karen Dr, Center to Thompson Install sidewalk and crosswalks
51 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $500K-$1M
Holts
Summit No Halifax Rd, Center to Nieman Install sidewalk and crosswalks
52 3
Near-Term
5-10 years
St. Martins/
Cole County Yes Route T, Henwick Ln to Bus 50 W Install curb, gutter & sidewalk in each direction
53 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $50K-$100k CAMPO No
Bike lane installation in CAMPO
Region Continue expansion of bike lanes in the downtown area.
54 3
Long-Term
10 years<$10M<CAMPO No CAMPO Greenway Connectivity Continue to expand greenways to connect cities in the CAMPO Region
55 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $50k-$1M
Jefferson
City No Jefferson City Greenway Projects
Locations may include; Fairgrounds Acres to County Park, South Country Club Drive to Turtle Creek subdivision,
Ellis-Porter Riverside Park connector from St. Louis Road, Wears Creek to East Branch Connector, Frog Hollow
Phase 4, Creek Trail to W. Edgewood, JCMG to Satinwood, Dunklin to W. Main via Bolivar, Aurora Park to Ellis
Blvd
56 3
Near-Term
5-10 years $1M-$5M
Jefferson
City Yes
Missouri Blvd and S. Ten MIle,
Stoneridge Pkwy to S. Country Club
Install Sidewalks and crosswalks along route with pedestrian accesss over MO 179 provided via a pedestrian
bridge connecting S. Ten Mile east and west segments
Tier 1
Regionally Significant
High Priority – Board approved top #3 in 2018
Supported by TDM
Supports increased capacity or improves safety
Tier 2
High Priority for Stakeholders and Work Group
Most are supported by TDM
Supports increased system performance or improves safety
Tier 3
Designated by stakeholders as a need
May be supported by TDM
May be completed in phases
Supports increased system performance or improves safety
Multi-Modal
Pedestrian & Non-Motorized Enhancments and Safety Improvements
CAMPO 2045 MTP
Illustrative List
DRAFT
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Status of Current Work Tasks
April 4, 2019
Summary
The following list includes work tasks that are currently in progress or have been completed since the previous
Technical Committee meeting:
• CAMPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Update. Staff continues
development of the 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The data and public
engagement material from recent meetings may be found at www.campo2045.com. Please
see the attached staff report for more information.
• CAMPO 2045 MTP Public Meeting. A public meeting was held on March 19. 20
persons attended and gave CAMPO staff input on the four proposed scenarios. After
analyzing all public comments, CAMPO staff instructed the consultant to update the travel
demand model based on the Trend Scenario.
• Work Group Meeting. CAMPO staff met with representatives from the Technical
Committee and the Board of Directors to help prioritize an illustrative list of future
unfunded projects in the region. The list will be included in the CAMPO 2045 MTP
Please see the attached staff report for more information.
• Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). Work continues on the FY2020 UPWP.
The draft budget for FY2020 is approximately $179,580 with $143,664 (80%) funded
through the Consolidated Planning Grant and $35,916 (20%) funded through local match.
Please see the attached staff report for more information.
• Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Staff is working on the 2020-2024 TIP
with an expected completion date coinciding with adoption of the MTP. This includes
asking members to review the budget information, review existing projects in the TIP, and
ask for projects for inclusion into the new TIP. Please see the attached staff report for
more information.
• JEFFTRAN assistance. Staff continues development of a new route guide incorporating
new route changes.
• Federal Performance Measures. CAMPO staff continues collaborating with MODOT
staff concerning various federal performance measures required by MAP-21 and the
FAST Act.
• Taos Sewer Map. CAMPO staff will start working with the Village of Taos in Summer
2019 to update their sewer map.
• STIP update. CAMPO staff met with MoDOT and the other planning partners in the
Central District to discuss updates to the State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP).
o Also discussed was the Rocheport Bridge Rehabilitation, which is due to begin in
February 2020 and continue until approximately October 2020. Traffic delays on
I-70 are anticipated to be between 3 to 8 hours, depending on special events or
other circumstances.
o MoDOT has been watching possible funding proposals go through the legislature.
Planning partners will be asked to identify projects for additional funding, should
it become available.
Agenda Item 8A