HomeMy Public PortalAbout2019-05-02 packet
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats
as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Technical Committee
Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.
Meeting Location: Boone/Bancroft Room # 200, John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 - Enter through Main Lobby
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
2. Public comment
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of April 4, 2019
5. Communication Received
6. Old Business
A. 2020-2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Draft
Action Requested: Review, approval, and recommendation to Board of Directors.
Staff Report: CAMPO staff has completed the annual update of the Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) and the draft is available for review. In preparing the TIP, CAMPO staff contacted member jurisdictions
for budget information, to review existing projects in the TIP, and ask for projects for inclusion into the new
TIP. Please see the attached staff report outlining the content of the TIP and detailing changes made last
presented at the April 4 meeting.
B. 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Draft
Action Requested: Review, approval, and recommendation to the Board of Directors.
Staff Report: A draft of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) has been
completed and is available for review. Please see the attached staff report for details on the Draft CAMPO 2045
& Beyond MTP. Staff is seeking approval by the Technical Committee and recommendation to the Board of
Directors.
7. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
B. Member Updates
8. Next Meeting Date – Thursday, June 6, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room #200
9. Adjournment
Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457
MINUTES
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
April 4, 2019
VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT
Cole County: Larry Benz
Jefferson City: David Bange, Vice Chairman
Eric Barron
JJ Gates
Mark Mehmert*
Sonny Sanders, Chairman
Britt Smith
MoDOT: Mike Henderson
Steve Engelbrecht
Bob Lynch
Wardsville: Paul Stonner
Private Transportation Interest: Joe Scheppers
*Arrived Late
VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT
Paul Winkelmann, Callaway County
Mark Tate, Holts Summit
Cary Maloney, Pedestrian or Biking Interest
Matt Morasch, Jefferson City
Eric Landwehr, Cole County
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration
Jeremiah Shuler, Federal Transit Administration
STAFF PRESENT (Non-Voting)
Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner
Alex Rotenberry, Transportation Planner
Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant
Beth Sweeten, Administrative Assistant
GUESTS PRESENT
Jennifer Bowden, MORPC
Kim Tipton, MoDOT
Christopher Kinzel HDR
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
Mr. Sanders called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. and asked Ms. Sweeten to call roll. A quorum of 12
voting members was present.
2. Public comment
None received.
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed unanimously.
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of March 7, 2019
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Henderson seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of March 7, 2019
as written. The motion passed unanimously.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
April 4, 2019 Page 2
5. Communications from the presiding officer
No correspondence was received.
6. Old Business
A. 2020-2024 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Draft
Mr. Rotenberry explained The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of
transportation projects to be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which are funded
by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Fede ral Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed
‘regionally significant.’ The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with local jurisdictions,
the Missouri Department of Transportation, and local public transportation operators. The development of
the 2020-2024 TIP has started. He stated that the draft TIP was included in the pack. CAMPO staff still
anticipates a finalized project list from MoDOT, which will be incorporated into the draft plan for the May
Technical Committee.
B. FY 2020 Unified Planning Work Program Update(UPWP) Draft
Ms. Williams explained that staff has begun work on the FY2020 Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP). She stated that this annual process starts very early due to the City of Jefferson’s budget process.
Ms. Williams explained that the FY2020 UPWP is anticipated to be adopted by May 2019. She stated that
the draft budget for FY2020 is approximately $179,580, but may change by a minor amount as the UPWP
is reviewed by the Technical Committee, Board of Directors, CAMPO staff and the public.
Mr. Smith made a motion to forward the draft FY2020 Unified Planning Work Program to the Board of
Directors for review and approval. Mr. Benz seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
C. 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Development
Ms. Williams stated that CAMPO continues the update of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP). A draft of the MTP is included was included and can be found on the
project website at www.campo2045.com. She explained that two public meetings have been held
(October 2018 and March 2019) as part of the MTP update process. The March meeting was well
attended with 20 attendees. An October 2018 public survey resulted in 92 responses and a report on the
survey results was given at to the Technical Committee and Board of Directors. A full report of the
survey results and other materials and documents relating to the planning process can be found at
www.campo2045.com. Comments continue to be accepted as part of the update process.
7. New Business
A. Illustrative Project List of the 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan
Ms. Williams stated the illustrative list includes projects that have been identified as needs in the region
that, given funding, may be completed in the next 10 to 25 years. This list is included in the Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP) in the implementation section. Items on the list may be implemented as
funding is made available. MoDOT and other agencies frequently request this list in the development of
statewide programming. Applications for grant funding usually require projects to be included on this
list in order to be eligible for funding. Projects on the list stem from public comments, stakeholder
comments, or were identified by the travel demand model. Public meetings held in October of 2018 and
March of 2019 garnered several public comments about transportation needs in the region. Most of these
comments are covered by projects included in the previous illustrative list from 2013 or have been
identified by stakeholders and public comment during planning processes since then. She stated staff
would recommend sending it to the Board of Directors for their review and approval.
A motion was made by Mr. Benz to bring the Illustrative List to the CAMPO Board of Directors. Mr.
Mehmert seconded the motion and all were in favor. The motion passed unanimously.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
April 4, 2019 Page 3
8. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
JEFFTRAN Route Guide support. Ms. Williams reported that staff continues to work with
JEFFTRAN staff in finalizing a new route guide.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Staff is working on the 2020-2024 TIP. This
includes asking members to review the budget information, review existing projects in the TIP, and ask
for projects for inclusion into the new TIP. The 2020 -2024 TIP is anticipated to be adopted in June
2019.
Federal Performance Measures. CAMPO staff continues collaborating with MODOT staff
concerning various federal performance measures required by MAP -21 and the FAST Act.
Taos Sewer Map. CAMPO staff will start working with the Village of Taos in Summer 2019 to
update their sewer map.
5310 Applications. Staff submitted Letters of Support for Section 5310 Grant Funds.
B. Member Updates
Jefferson City
--Mr. Bange gave an update on the following: (1) Dunklin Street Bridge replacement and corridor
project; (2); Traffic study for Clark Ln
--Mr. Smith gave an update on the Airport Master Plan
--Mr. Mehmert gave in update on reconfiguring JeffTran routes.
--Mr. Gates gave an update of the new community park project
--Mr. Baron gave an update of the Old St. Mary’s subdivision plat approval.
8. Next Meeting Date - Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room.
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 11:08 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beth Sweeten, Administrative Assistant
Transportation Improvement Program
Program Years 2020 - 2024
July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2024
Adopted June 16, 2019
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal
Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this
report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of
Transportation.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the
grounds of race, color, sex, age, disability or national origin, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259).
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone: (573) 634-6410 Fax: (573) 634-6457
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1
Public Participation ....................................................................................................................................... 2
Project Selection ........................................................................................................................................... 2
TIP Development .......................................................................................................................................... 3
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications ................................................................................... 3
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects ............................................................................................................ 4
Air Quality Designation ................................................................................................................................ 4
Environmental Justice ................................................................................................................................... 4
Federal Performance Measures ..................................................................................................................... 4
Financial Plan................................................................................................................................................ 8
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding ......................................................................... 8
Operations and Maintenance ................................................................................................................... 10
Operations and Maintenance - Local Government ................................................................................. 10
Financial Constraint ................................................................................................................................ 12
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects ............................................................................................. 13
Figure 12 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects .............................................................. 27
Program of Projects - OATS ....................................................................................................................... 28
Figure 13 - Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN ........................................................................................... 29
Multimodal Projects .................................................................................................................................... 30
Regionally Significant Projects ................................................................................................................... 30
Appendix A – Amendments and Administrative Modifications ................................................................. 31
Appendix B – Federal Funding Sources ..................................................................................................... 32
Appendix C – Policies and Procedures ....................................................................................................... 33
Appendix D – Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification .............................................. 37
Appendix E – Definitions ........................................................................................................................... 38
i
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
FTA 5303 Metropolitan & Statewide
Planning and NonMetropolitan
Transportation Planning
FTA 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
FTA 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors
and Individuals with Disabilities
FTA 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
Adv. Con. Advanced Construction
AM Asset Management (Replaces
TCOS in 2022)
CAMPO Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
CO Carbon Monoxide (vehicle
emissions)
EPA Environmental Protection
Agency
FAST Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act
FHWA Federal Highway
Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FY Fiscal Year
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement
Program
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in
the 21st Century
MoDOT Missouri Department of
Transportation
MPO Metropolitan Planning
Organization
MTP Metropolitan Transportation
Plan
NHFP National Highway Freight
Program
NHPP National Highway Performance
Program
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
ONE DOT Collaboration between FHWA
and FTA
PBPP Performance Based Planning
and Programming
PM-2.5 Small Particulate Matter Lead
POP Program of Projects
PY Program Year
SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
STIP State Transportation
Improvement Program
STBG Surface Transportation Block
Grant Program
TAP Transportation Alternatives
TCOS Taking Care of the System
TERM Transit Economic Requirements
Model
TDM Travel Demand Model
TIP Transportation Improvement
Program
TPM Transportation Performance
Management
VMT Vehicle Miles of Travel
ii
(Resolution approving TIP goes here)
iii
(CAMPO Board, TC, and staff listing goes here)
1
Introduction
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) is the designated metropolitan planning
organization for the Jefferson City, Missouri planning area whose purpose is to carry out a continuing,
cooperative, and comprehensive long range transportation planning process. As part of this process, in
2018, CAMPO updated the 2013-2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) with the last program
year TIP, to address the current and future transportation needs for the Metropolitan Planning Area
(MPA). The MPA includes a southern portion of Callaway County, northeastern portion of Cole County,
cities of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, and Wardsville.
Figure 1 – The CAMPO Planning Area
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects
to be implemented within the MPA. The projects are funded by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed “regionally significant.” Each project
or project phase included in the TIP is consistent with investment strategies discussed in the MTP and is
part of the process of applying for funds from the FHWA and FTA. Certain capital and non-capital
transportation projects using funding under 23 U.S.C. and 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or regionally significant
2
projects requiring action by the FHWA or the FTA are required to be included in the TIP. The TIP is
updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation and local
public transportation operators.
Public Participation
CAMPO seeks active and meaningful involvement of the public and interested parties in the development
and update of transportation plans and programs, including the TIP. All meetings of the CAMPO
Technical Committee and Board of Directors are open to the public. All meeting agendas and minutes are
available on the City of Jefferson website or upon request. CAMPO provides all interested parties and the
public with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP as required by federal law.
Reasonable opportunity to comment and participate on the proposed TIP is made following the policies in
the CAMPO Public Participation Plan located on the CAMPO website at
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo. The approved TIP is available for review at several locations
throughout the CAMPO planning area as outlined in the Public Participation Plan.
The FTA allows a grantee, e.g. JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc., to rely on locally adopted public
participation plans for the submittal of their projects in lieu of a separate “Program of Projects” (POP) if
the grantee has coordinated with CAMPO and has ensured that the public is aware that the TIP and the
Public Participation Plan are being used to satisfy the POP public participation requirements. JEFFTRAN
is the public transit provider for the City of Jefferson and OATS, Inc. is a not-for-profit 501(c)3
corporation providing specialized transportation for senior citizens, people with disabilities and the rural
general public in 87 Missouri counties. Federal Transit Administration recipients of certain categories of
funds, JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. must follow a public participation plan. Both JEFFTRAN and OATS,
Inc. meet this coordination and public awareness criteria.
Project Selection
Transportation projects, funded by direct allocation of Federal funds to a project sponsor, award of
Federal funds via competitive grant, or wholly funded by the sponsor, are selected by the agency having
jurisdiction over the project using their own criteria and submitted to the CAMPO Board of Directors for
inclusion in the TIP. Transportation projects included within the TIP should be consistent with
investment strategies discussed in the MTP.
CAMPO no longer receives STBG funds from MoDOT, nor does it have any other type of discretionary
funding for infrastructure projects. If such funds again become available, the following prioritization
process is in place.
Transportation projects, funded by sub-allocated Federal funds directly to CAMPO or otherwise made
available for programming at the discretion of CAMPO, are selected based on competitive process
approved by the CAMPO Board of Directors. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on
CAMPO priorities by staff, and review by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to
3
the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote of approval. The ranking process has unique evaluation
criteria for different categories of projects – roadway/intersection, bridge, non-motorized, transit, and
‘other.’
TIP Development
The TIP is updated every year and covers a 5-year period starting July 1, 2019. TIP development begins
with a verification of status of projects in the current TIP, solicitation of new projects, and request for
budget information from local jurisdictions. Local transit providers are also requested to provide
information needed to develop their “Program of Projects” for inclusion in the TIP. CAMPO staff, with
support from the Technical Committee, member jurisdictions, MoDOT, FHWA, and FTA, develop the
financial plan, project listings, maintenance and operations, and other components of the TIP.
Once the draft TIP is developed, it is presented to the Technical Committee for review and
recommendation to the Board of Directors. A 25 day public comment period and public hearing are held
prior to the Board of Directors approval of the TIP. The Board then requests approval of the TIP by the
Governor and ONE DOT (consisting of FHWA and FTA). More information about public involvement
activities can be found in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan.
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Between TIP updates, if projects need to be added, removed or changed, the TIP can be changed either by
amendment or administrative modifications. Definitions of an amendment or an administrative
modification, and information about public participation, notifications, and other procedures regarding
amendments and administrative modifications, can be found in Appendix C – Policies and Procedures of
this document. Appendix A contains a listing of amendments and administrative modifications that have
occurred to this document.
Previous Projects
The TIP will include a listing of major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and identify
any significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. Major projects are defined as
transportation improvement projects receiving Federal financial assistance with an estimated total cost of
$500 million or more or that have been identified by the FHWA as being a major project.
No major projects were implemented, and no significant delays or projects from the previous TIP have
been identified.
4
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) requires that CAMPO publish an annual
listing of federally obligated projects. The Annual Listing of Projects is an index of projects which used
Federal funds that were obligated in the preceding TIP program year. Obligated projects are consistent
with the funding categories identified in the TIP.
An obligation is the Federal government’s legal commitment to pay the Federal share of a project’s cost.
An obligated project is one that has been authorized and funds have been obligated by a Federal agency.
Obligated projects are not necessarily initiated or completed in the program year, and the amount of the
obligation will not necessarily equal the total cost of the project. For Federal Transit Administration
projects, obligation occurs when the grant is awarded. For Federal Highway Administration projects,
obligation occurs when a project agreement is executed and the State/grantee requests that the funds be
obligated.
CAMPO publishes the Annual Listing of Obligated Projects yearly within 90 days of the previous TIP’s
program year. The Annual Listing of Obligated Projects is posted on the CAMPO website at
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo.
Air Quality Designation
The United States Environmental Protection Agency has designated the CAMPO Metropolitan Planning
Area as being in attainment for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Small
Particulate Matter (PM-2.5) Lead, and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2).
Environmental Justice
Executive Order 12898 requires agencies receiving federal funding to meaningfully address low-income
and minority populations in their plans, programs, policies, and activities. CAMPO staff expects project
sponsors to identify and mitigate any disproportionately high and adverse effects of federal transportation
programs.
Federal Performance Measures
In the passage of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), and continuing into
the FAST Act, Congress established Transportation Performance Management (TPM). FHWA defines
TPM as a strategic approach that uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to
achieve national performance goals.
Another new requirement is Performance Based Planning and Programming (PBPP) which impacts the
TIP and the MTP. PBPP refers to the application of performance management principles within the
5
planning and programming processes of transportation agencies to achieve desired performance outcomes
for the multimodal transportation system.
To comply with these new requirements, the CAMPO Board of Directors adopted targets for four
performance areas: the Transit Asset Management, Safety, Pavement and Bridge, and Travel Time
Reliability and Freight Reliability.
Transit Asset Management Measures
MoDOT collected and evaluated existing buses and facilities to be included in the State Transit Asset
Management Plan and used this information to set targets, which will be evaluated on an annual basis as
inventory changes. JEFFTRAN opted to create its own Transit Asset Management Plan and set its own
targets, which are identical to the state targets, as listed below.
Figure 2 – Transit Asset Management targets by MoDOT and JEFFTRAN
JEFFTRAN TAM Plan Fiscal Year 2019 Targets
Equipment: Non-revenue support-service and
maintenance vehicles (exceeding $50,000 at purchase) N/A
Rolling Stock: Revenue vehicles by mode and ULB*:
Automobiles, Minivans, Vans 8 years 45%
Cutaways 10 years 45%
Buses 14 years 45%
Facilities
Administrative facilities and passenger stations
30% with a condition
rating below 3.0 on
FTA's TERM** Scale
Maintenance facilities
25% with a condition
rating below 3.0 on
FTA's TERM Scale
* ULB stands for Useful Life Benchmark
** TERM is a Federal Transit Administration Transit Economic Requirements Model which helps transit
agencies assess their state of good repair backlog, level of annual investment to attain state of good repair,
impact of variations in funding, and investment priorities.
JEFFTRAN has its budget, fiscally constrained projects, and Program of Projects in this document. The
agency has identified $125,000 that may be utilized for bus replacement and other capital projects to help
JEFFTRAN move towards these targets.
Safety Measures
The Federal Highway Administration established five performance measures to assess performance and
carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program: (1) number of fatalities, (2) rate of fatalities per
6
vehicle mile traveled (VMT), (3) number of serious injuries, (4) rate of serious injuries per VMT, and (5)
number of combined non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries.
MoDOT established the following statewide safety targets in 2018, as seen in Figure 3, which shows the
targets set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. These targets are updated annually.
Figure 3 – Safety Performance Measures set by MoDOT*
Performance Measure 5-year Rolling Average
(2013-2017)
5-Year Rolling
Average Statewide
Target for CY2019
Number of Fatalities 854.4 872.3
Fatality rate per 100 Million VMT 1.176 1.160
Number of Serious Injuries 4,756.4 4433.8
Serious Injury Rate per 100 Million
VMT
6.566 6.168
Number of Non-Motorized
Fatalities and Serious Injuries
441.3 445.4
* Targets based on the State Highway Safety Plan: Missouri Blueprint -A Partnership Towards Zero Deaths, a 9% fatality
reduction, 5% serious injury reduction, 1% VMT increase and 4 % non-motorized reduction
There are a number of projects programmed for safety in the TIP, totaling $20,199,000 for Program Years
2020-2024, all sponsored by the Central District of MoDOT, to help the State move towards these targets.
CAMPO staff also actively participates in the Central District Coalition of Roadway Safety, which works
to implement Missouri’s Blueprint ultimate goal of zero fatalities on Missouri roadways, and participates
in the annual Highway Safety and Traffic Blueprint Conference.
Pavement and Bridge Measures
The Federal Highway Administration established 6 performance measures to assess pavement and bridge
conditions: (1) percent of interstate pavements in Good condition, (2) percent of interstate pavements in
Poor condition, (3) percent of non-interstate national highway system (NHS) pavements in Good
condition, (4) percent of non-interstate NHS pavements in Poor condition, (5) percent of NHS bridges by
deck area classified as Good condition, and (6) percent of NHS bridges by deck area classified as Poor
condition. There are no interstate highways in the CAMPO region, so those targets are not addressed.
MoDOT established the following statewide pavement and bridge targets in 2018, as seen in Figure 4,
which shows the targets set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. These targets may be updated every
other year.
7
Figure 4 – Applicable Pavement and Bridge Targets set by MoDOT
Performance Measure 2017
Baseline
2019
Target
2021
Target
Percentage of NHS Bridges in Good Condition 34.0% 30.9% 30.9%
Percentage of NHS Bridges in Poor Condition 7.1% 7.1% 7.1%
Percentage of non-Interstate NHS Pavements in Good Condition 61.1% 61.1% 61.1%
Percentage of non-Interstate NHS Pavements in Poor Condition 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
Many projects in the TIP address Asset Management, a major priority for MoDOT. There are currently
$54,407,000 projects in the 2020-2024 TIP that address either work on roads or bridges to maintain or
update them which will help the state maintain these targets.
Travel Time Reliability and Freight Reliability
The Federal Highway Administration established 3 performance measures to assess travel time reliability
and assessing freight movement on the interstate system: (1) Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled
on the Interstate, (2) Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS, and (3) Truck
Travel Time Reliability Index. There are no interstate highways in the CAMPO region, so targets one and
three are not applicable to CAMPO.
MoDOT established the following travel time reliability targets in 2018, as seen in Figure 5, which shows
the targets set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. This target may be updated every other year.
Figure 5 – Applicable Travel Time Reliability Target set by MoDOT
Performance Measure 2017
Baseline
2019
Target
2021
Target
Non-Interstate Travel Time Reliability Measure: Percent of
Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS
92.3% - 87.8%
There are currently no projects programmed into the 2020-2024 TIP with the sole purpose of improving
travel time reliability. Several of the projects within the TIP address this target indirectly which will help
the state with this target.
8
Financial Plan
The TIP includes a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, and
indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to
carry out the TIP. CAMPO, MoDOT, and public transportation operators cooperatively develop
estimates of funds that are reasonably expected to be available to support TIP implementation. Only
projects for which construction or operating funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be
included. In developing the financial plan, CAMPO takes into account all projects and strategies funded
under Title 23 U.S.C., Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, and other federal funds, and regionally significant
projects that are not federally funded. For purposes of transportation operations and maintenance, the
financial plan shall contain system-level estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably
expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways (as defined by Title 23
U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation (as defined by Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53).
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding
Federal funding forecasts, provided by MoDOT based on published notices in the Federal Register,
estimate fiscal year authorization levels by the FHWA and FTA under the current highway act. Appendix
B briefly describes most of the Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO
planning area.
For Federally-funded projects, the TIP must identify the appropriate “matching funds” by source. The
matching funds are usually provided by state and local governments. State revenue forecasts are also
provided by MoDOT based on historical data of the State Fuel Tax, State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax and
General Revenue.
Local revenue forecast from the County Aid Road Trust (State Fuel Tax and State Vehicle Sales and Use
Tax) for each jurisdiction are based on past distributions and are assumed to continue a trend of a two
percent inflation rate. The City of Jefferson has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement
Program and a ½ cent sales tax for Parks and Recreation, which supports greenways and other non-
motorized transportation activities. The City of Jefferson has provided its own future revenue projections
from these sources. Cole County has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a
real property tax levy of $0.27 earmarked for Road & Bridges. All small cities get $100,000 every five
years from Cole County, which comes from the aforementioned sales tax. Callaway County has a real
property tax levy of $0.2466 earmarked for Road & Bridges.
Outlined in Figure 6 are local forecasts of revenue sources for over the life of the TIP available for
transportation projects.
9
Figure 6 – Forecast Revenue for Transportation projects
In the past, local governments have used general revenue and other sources of revenue, as they deemed
appropriate to match transportation grants awarded. It is not uncommon, nor difficult, for local
jurisdictions to transfer funds from one account to another at their discretion.
Figure 7 shows the total programmed project funds and available project funds by source. The project
costs have inflation factored in by each project sponsor. The instructions on the form used to submit a
project for inclusion in the TIP reminds the project sponsor to take inflation into account when estimating
the project’s cost. Since the last iteration of the MTP, the inflation factor for the TIP has been set as two
percent.
Callaway County 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)1,771,294$ 1,806,720$ 1,842,854$ 1,879,711$ 1,917,305$ 9,217,884$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.2466 levy)1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$ 9,500,000$
Transfer from general revenue 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,500,000$
Cole County
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)829,043$ 845,624$ 862,536$ 879,787$ 897,383$ 4,314,372$
Sales Tax 5,440,179$ 5,440,179$ 5,440,179$ 5,440,179$ 5,440,179$ 27,200,895$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.27 levy)3,980,380$ 3,980,380$ 3,980,380$ 3,980,380$ 3,980,380$ 19,901,900$
Motor Vehicle Sales Tax 368,032$ 368,032$ 368,032$ 368,032$ 368,032$ 1,840,160$
Holts Summit
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)**151,038$ 154,059$ 157,140$ 160,283$ 163,488$ 786,008$
City of Jefferson
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)1,808,889$ 1,845,067$ 1,881,968$ 1,919,607$ 1,957,999$ 9,413,530$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Parks Sales Tax 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 4,951,878$ 24,759,390$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement (Expires March 2022)1,420,000$ 1,420,000$ 1,420,000$ 1,420,000$ 1,420,000$ 7,100,000$
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
Farebox & Reimbursements 416,000$ 395,200$ 375,000$ 356,000$ 338,000$ 1,880,200$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement (Expires March 2022)80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 400,000$
St. Martins
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)47,483$ 48,908$ 50,375$ 51,887$ 53,443$ 252,096$
General Revenue Funds 821,754$ 184,870$ 190,416$ 196,128$ 202,013$ 1,595,181$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement*20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Taos
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)36,867$ 37,605$ 38,357$ 39,124$ 39,906$ 191,858$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement* 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Wardsville
County Aid Road Trust - (State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, Motor Vehicle Fees)63,237$ 64,502$ 65,792$ 67,108$ 68,450$ 329,088$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement* 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
OATS
Passenger Fares, Misc.5,000$ 5,000$ 5,100$ 5,100$ 5,100$ 25,300$
Local Contracts 40,000$ 60,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 325,000$
120,832,861$
Note: County Aid Road Trust includes State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales/Use Tax and Licensing Fees.
Please see more on CART funds here: http://dor.mo.gov/publicreports/index.php#motorfuel
* This is distributed from Cole County
Available Local Transportation Funds
Total Local Funds
CART Funds based on 2018 numbers from MoDOT. There is a conservative two (2) percent
increase per year, based on historical numbers.
** Holts Summit now receives Lake Mykee's CART funds after they merged in 2017.
10
Figure 7 – Programmed Funds by Source.
Operations and Maintenance
Maintenance costs include MoDOT’s salaries, materials and equipment needed to deliver the roadway
and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities like minor surface
treatments such as: sealing, small concrete repairs and pothole patching; mowing right of way; snow
removal; replacing signs; striping; repairing guardrail; and repairing traffic signals. Performing these
activities requires employees; vehicles and other machinery; and materials such as salt, asphalt and fuel.
Maintenance operations expenditures are expected to increase 1.8% annually. This makes MoDOT’s cost,
$4,870 per lane mile
Operations and Maintenance - Local Government
Local revenue sources for operations and maintenance include state fuel tax, state vehicles sales/use tax,
local sales taxes, franchise fees, license and permit fees, property taxes, and other revenue sources that
provide significant resources for local general fund and specific funding of transportation. Not all taxes
and fees go to transportation, so the local jurisdiction usually will identify a budget specifically for
transportation purposes, such as capital improvements, Road and Bridge funds, transit operating
subsidies, road and street budgets, or operations and maintenance budgets.
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
FHWA Adv. Con.$15,154,400 $3,351,200 $13,611,200 $0 $0 $32,116,800
FHWA NHPP $9,001,200 $4,694,600 $374,400 $0 $0 $14,070,200
FHWA HSIP $1,009,000 $13,007,000 $57,600 $0 $0 $14,073,600
FHWA STBG $800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800
FHWA TAP $397,456 $0 $0 $0 $0 $397,456
FHWA SHRP2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA RTP $14,149 $14,148 $0 $0 $0 $28,297
FTA 5307 $793,880 $797,849 $801,838 $805,847 $809,877 $4,009,291
FTA 5310 $40,000 $160,000 $75,000 $175,000 $75,000 $525,000
FTA 5311 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5329 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5339 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT AM $0 $0 $3,496,400 $0 $0 $3,496,400
MoDOT MPEN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT Safety $118,000 $1,592,000 $6,400 $0 $0 $1,716,400
MoDOT State Operating $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $57,075
MoDOT SWIMB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT TCOS $6,697,600 $1,158,200 $0 $0 $0 $7,855,800
MoDOT State Rail $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Jefferson City $1,157,296 $1,180,427 $1,203,271 $1,227,336 $1,251,883 $6,020,213
Cole County $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Oats $40,000 $60,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $325,000
Holts Summit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
St. Martins $476,074 $0 $0 $0 $0 $476,074
Other $187,552 $236,401 $179,921 $231,670 $183,435 $1,018,979
$35,098,822 $26,263,240 $19,892,445 $2,526,268 $2,406,610
$86,187,385Total Programmed Total
Programmed Funds
Federal
State
Local
Yearly Totals
11
The operations and maintenance costs for local governments include salaries, fringe benefits, materials,
and equipment needed to deliver the street and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes
basic maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as sealing, small concrete repairs, pothole
patching, mowing, snow removal, replacing signs, striping, and repairing traffic signals. These activities
may be performed in-house or outsourced.
Local government operations and maintenance on federal aid roads calculated for the system wide
average of operations & maintenance per centerline mile is determined below in Figure 8. As a further
demonstration of fiscal constraint, Federal Highway Administration has requested that the municipalities
report their operations and maintenance budget. Reported below are five examples: Cole and Callaway
Counties, Jefferson City, St. Martins, and MoDOT.
Figure 8 – 2020 Operations and Maintenance costs for local jurisdictions
Municipality Cost per lane mile
Cole County $6,724
Callaway County $2,469
Jefferson City $5,888
St. Martins $5,435
MoDOT $4,870
Figure 9 shows the various roadway types in CAMPO’s MPA and the governing body that is responsible
for maintenance.
Figure 9 - Federal Aid Road Mileage by Jurisdiction.
Source: CAMPO Functional Classification GIS Database.
Urban
Other
Freeway
Express
way
Urban
Other
Principal
Arterial
Urban
Minor
Arterial
Urban
Collector
Rural
Other
Principal
Arterial
Rural
Minor
Arterial
Rural
Major
Collector
Total Percent of
Total
(Jurisdiction)
Callaway County 2.3 2.9 0.9 6.1 2.89%
Cole County 3.6 5.9 4.6 14.1 6.63%
Holts Summit 3.1 4.1 0.5 7.6 3.61%
City of Jefferson*4.3 37.4 23.6 65.3 30.83%
MoDOT 34.6 8.7 18.2 11.9 5.4 5.3 32.7 116.8 55.13%
St. Martins 1.5 0.5 1.9 0.91%
Taos 0.0 0.00%
Wardsville 0.0 0.00%
Total (Functional Class)34.6 13.0 66.1 48.8 5.4 6.3 37.8 211.9 100.00%
Percent (Functional Class)16.3%6.1%31.2%23.0%2.5%3.0%17.8%
*Includes Parks & Rec.
12
In addition to the local government operations and maintenance previously discussed, JEFFTRAN
expenses also cover fleet repair/maintenance, repairing/replacing bus shelters, bus washing, bus
maintenance facilities, public restrooms, and fuel. Figures 10 and 11 show the estimated expenditures for
transit operations and maintenance for JEFFTRAN and OATs, respectively.
Figure 10 - JEFFTRAN Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Operations and Maintenance revenue and expenditures are based on the most recently available budgets
Figure 11 – OATS Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Financial Constraint
To exhibit financial constraint, a financial plan should address three questions:
1) What will the needs for transportation in the CAMPO planning area cost?
The needs are identified by project in the following section and costs are summarized by funding
source in Figure 6.
2) What revenues are available that can be applied to the needs?
Specific revenues available to meet the needs are identified in Figure 6 - Forecast Revenue for
Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance, by jurisdiction and source.
3) Are the revenues sufficient to cover the costs?
As shown in Figure 7 – Programmed by Source, programmed fund amounts equal anticipated
fund amounts. For many jurisdictions as shown in Figure 6, available funds exceed the amounts
of revenues required to fund programmed projects.
Funding Type FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
FTA Section 5307 793,880$ 740,928$ 740,928$ 740,928$ 740,928$
City of Jefferson-Local Operating Assistance 1,156,546$ 1,179,677$ 1,203,271$ 1,227,336$ 1,251,883$
MoDOT State Operating Assistance 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$
Farebox & Reimbursements 416,000$ 395,200$ 375,000$ 356,000$ 338,000$
Capital Funds 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$
Total 2,502,926$ 2,452,305$ 2,455,699$ 2,460,764$ 2,467,311$
Funding Sources 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
FTA-Section 5310 40,000$ 60,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$
Fares 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,100$ 5,100$ 5,100$
Local Contracts 40,000$ 60,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$
Total 85,000$ 125,000$ 155,100$ 155,100$ 155,100$
13
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $89,600 $86,400 $176,000
MoDOT TCOS $22,400 $21,600 $44,000
TIP #2018-01 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3261 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $582,400 $582,400
MoDOT TCOS $145,600 $145,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $112,000 $836,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $948,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $204,800 $144,000 $393,600 $742,400
MoDOT TCOS $51,200 $36,000 $98,400 $185,600
TIP #2019-01 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3337 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $3,542,400 $3,542,400
MoDOT TCOS $885,600 $885,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $256,000 $180,000 $4,920,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,356,000
Comments: Project involves bridges A3451,
A4265, and A4662. Award date 2020.
Bridge Projects
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Total Project Cost: $948,000
Bridge Decksealing over Route 54 E
N
G
Description & Location: Includes bridge
decksealing on Route 94 over Little Tavern
Creek in Callaway County and West Main over
Route 54/63 in Cole County
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvements On US 54 Over
Missouri River E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvements
for both bridges over the Missouri River in
Jefferson City.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridges A4497 and
L0550.
Total Project Cost: $5,356,000
14
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $800 $16,000 $64,000 $100,800 $181,600
MoDOT TCOS $200 $4,000 $16,000 $20,200
TIP #2019-02 MoDOT AM $25,200 $25,200
MoDOT#5P2190 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$273,600 $273,600
MoDOT AM $68,400 $68,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total $1,000 $20,000 $80,000 $468,000 $0 $0 $0 $569,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $93,600 $494,400 $588,000
MoDOT TCOS $23,400 $123,600 $147,000
TIP #2017-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3121 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $5,070,400 $5,070,400
MoDOT TCOS $1,267,600 $1,267,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $117,000 $6,956,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,073,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:US 54 Pavement Improvements E
N
G
Comments: Award Date 2020.
R
O
W
Comments: Project involves bridge A5552.
Total Project Cost: $569,000
Prior
Funding
Roadway Projects
Funding
C
O
N
S
T
Total Project Cost: $7,073,000
Project
Name:
Bridge Preventative Maintenance On
US 50 Over Osage River E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge preventative
maintenance over the Osage River, 0.3 mile
west of the Route 63 junction.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Description & Location: Pavement resurfacing and
guard cables installation on the eastbound and
westbound lanes of US 54 from Route E to near
Stadium Boulevard in Jefferson City.
15
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA Adv. Con.$8,000 $11,200 $192,800 $212,000
MoDOT NHPP $2,000 $2,800 $48,200 $53,000
TIP #2019-03 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3333 MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$2,585,600 $2,585,600
MoDOT NHPP $646,400 $646,400
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total $10,000 $14,000 $3,473,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,497,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $16,000 $439,200 $455,200
MoDOT TCOS $4,000 $109,800 $113,800
TIP #2019-06 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3371 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $2,165,600 $2,165,600
MoDOT TCOS $541,400 $541,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total $20,000 $3,256,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,276,000
Project
Name:Guard Cables Along US 54 E
N
G
Description & Location: Guard cable
improvements from Miller County to near
Stadium Blvd. in Jefferson City
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Award date Fall 2019
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement Resurfacing on US 50 E
N
G
Total Project Cost: $3,497,000
MoDOT Funding
Description & Location: Pavement resurfacing
east of West Truman Blvd. to east of Kaylor
Bridge Road, all lanes and from east of Route M
to east of Stoney Gap Road
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal reimbursement
f rom NHPP.
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Total Project Cost: $3,276,000
16
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2020-01 Local St. Martins $62,382 $62,382
MoDOT#9901515 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA TAP $397,456 $397,456
MoDOT $0
Local St. Martins $413,692 $413,692
Other $0
Total $0 $873,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $873,530
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA Adv. Con.$4,000 $36,000 $927,200 $967,200
MoDOT AM $231,800 $231,800
TIP #2020-03 MoDOT TCOS $1,000 $9,000 $10,000
MoDOT#5P3409 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$12,684,000 $12,684,000
MoDOT AM $3,171,000 $3,171,000
MoDOT $0
Other $0
Total $0 $5,000 $45,000 $17,014,000 $0 $0 $0 $17,064,000
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: TAP grant awardee. Working with
Cole County to complete the project
Total Project Cost: $873,530
MoDOT
St. Martins Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Business 50 W Bike/Ped/ADA
Improvements E
N
G
Description & Location: Addition of 8-foot wide
asphalt bike/ped lanes for 1.1 miles in each
direction along Business 50 West from Rt. T/D
to west of Carel Rd.
Total Project Cost: $17,064,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement Improvements on US 63 E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement
improvements on US 63 from Route B to US
Route 54.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal funding
category: NHPP. Award Date 2022.
17
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $46,000 $148,800 $194,800
MoDOT Safety $11,000 $37,200 $48,200
TIP #2020-04 Local $0
MoDOT#5I3408 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $908,000 $908,000
MoDOT Safety $227,000 $227,000
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $57,000 $1,321,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,378,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA Adv. Con.$361,600 $361,600
MoDOT TCOS $90,400 $90,400
TIP #2020-13 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3426 Other $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$4,000 $4,000
MoDOT TCOS $1,000 $1,000
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$987,200 $987,200
MoDOT TCOS $246,800 $246,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $1,691,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,691,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Upgrading Signalization E
N
G
Description & Location: Upgrade signals at CC
and at Rte. C and CC in Cole County and at Rte.
OO and Summit Drive in Callaway County
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal funding
category: STBG. Award Date 2020.
MoDOT
Total Project Cost: $1,691,000
Description & Location: High Friction surface
treatment at various locations in Boone,
Morgan, Washington, Cooper, Callaway, and
Cole Counties
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal funding
category: HSIP. Award Date 2020.
Total Project Cost: $1,378,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:High Friction Surface Treatments E
N
G
18
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $45,900 $900 $900 $47,700
MoDOT Safety $5,100 $100 $100 $5,300
TIP #2013-16 Local $0
MoDOT#5S2234 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $51,000 $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $8,800 $8,800
TIP #2018-06 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3405 FHWA Adv. Con.$35,200 $35,200
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $120,000 $120,000
Local $0
MoDOT Adv. Con.$480,000 $480,000
Total $0 $644,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $644,000
Comments: Anticipated federal funding
category: Safety.
Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in
Northern Central District E
N
G
Project
Name:
C
O
N
S
T
Description & Location: Scoping for safety
improvements at the intersection of Route M
and Route W in Wardsville.
R
O
W
Other Projects
MoDOT State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Scoping Routes M, B & W E
N
G
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Award Date Spring 2019.
Anticipated federal reimbursement from STBG.
Total Project Cost: $644,000
Description & Location: Job order contracting
for guard cables and guardrail repair on
various routes in the northern portion of the
Central District.
Total Project Cost: $53,000
R
O
W
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30FundingPrior
FundingMoDOT
Prior
Funding
Funding
19
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA STBG $52,800 $800 $53,600
MoDOT TCOS $13,200 $200 $13,400
TIP #2015-07 MoDOT $0
MoDOT#5S3081 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $66,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $15,000 $15,000 $30,000
TIP #2018-08 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3402 MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
MoDOT $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total $0 $15,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Project
Name:
MoDOT
E
N
G
Description & Location: Surveying to sell
excess right of way parcels in the Central
District.
R
O
W
Total Project Cost: $30,000
Comments: No federal funds used for this
project.
Description & Location: Scoping for slide
repairs in the northern portion of the Central
District at various locations.
MoDOT
Project
Name:Surveying
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Total Project Cost: $67,000
Slide Repair Scoping
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated Federal Funding Category -
STBG. Future construction cost $2 million - 5 million.
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30Prior
Funding
Funding
R
O
W
E
N
G
C
O
N
S
T
20
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $14,000 $127,400 $141,400
TIP #2018-02 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3230 FHWA Adv. Con.$56,000 $509,600 $565,600
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $2,000
Local $0
MoDOT Adv. Con.$8,000 $8,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $628,000 $628,000
Local $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$2,512,000 $2,512,000
Total $70,000 $3,787,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,857,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $1,000 $10,800 $11,800
TIP #2020-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3386 FHWA Adv. Con.$4,000 $43,200 $47,200
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $123,200 $123,200
Local $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$492,800 $492,800
Total $0 $5,000 $670,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $675,000
Project
Name:Pavement improvements on Route U E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement & guardrail
improvements on Rte. U. Includes Route Y from
Route M in Taos, Rte W from Rte. B in
Wardsville, and Rte.J from 50.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Comments: Potential ADA improvements in
Taos. Award date 2020. Anticipated Federal
Funds: STBG.
Prior
Funding
Total Project Cost: $3,857,000
MoDOT Funding
Total Project Cost: $675,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement improvements on Route M E
N
G
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Description & Location: Pavement resurfacing
and adding rumble stripes from Rte. B to Rte.
50 and on Rte. E from Rte. 54 to Rte. B.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
21
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $10,000 $400 $10,400
TIP #2018-09 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3254 FHWA Adv. Con.$40,000 $1,600 $41,600
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $50,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2019-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3313 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $56,700 $56,700
MoDOT Safety $6,300 $6,300
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
R
O
W
E
N
G
C
O
N
S
T
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Description & Location: Scoping for ADA
improvements at various locations in Chamois,
Frankenstein, Route M in Taos, and Route W in
Wardsville.
Total Project Cost: $52,000
Project
Name:On-call Work Zone Enforcement
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
Comments: Anticipated Federal Category - STBG.
Includes sidewalks, curb ramps, entrances, and signals
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
MoDOT
Project
Name:
Scoping for ADA Improvements in
Various Locations E
N
G
Total Project Cost: $64,000
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
22
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2020-08 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3406 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $56,700 $56,700
MoDOT Safety $6,300 $6,300
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $900 $900
MoDOT Safety $100 $100
TIP #2020-09 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3407 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $56,700 $56,700
MoDOT Safety $6,300 $6,300
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 $64,000
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
Total Project Cost: $64,000
Project
Name:On-call Work Zone Enforcement
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
E
N
G
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Total Project Cost: $64,000
On-call Work Zone Enforcement E
N
G
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: 90/10 match, using federal and
MoDOT safety funds.
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
MoDOT
23
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA Adv. Con.$120,000 $800 $120,800
MoDOT TCOS $30,000 $200 $30,200
TIP #2020-11 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3421 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $150,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $4,500 $4,500 $9,000
MoDOT Safety $500 $500 $1,000
TIP #2020-12 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3418 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Funding Prior
Funding
Project
Name:Scoping on S. Ten Mile Drive E
N
G
MoDOT
E
N
G
Description & Location: Traffic safety studies
at various locations in Central District R
O
W
Description & Location: Scoping for intersection
safety improvements at South Ten Mile Drive in
Jefferson City
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $10,000
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $151,000
MoDOT Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Traffic Safety Studies
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
24
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $248,400 $540,000 $1,041,300 $1,829,700
MoDOT Safety $27,600 $60,000 $115,700 $203,300
TIP #2020-14 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3222 Other $0
FHWA HSIP $4,500 $4,500
MoDOT Safety $500 $500
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $4,764,600 $4,764,600
MoDOT Safety $529,400 $529,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total $276,000 $600,000 $6,456,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,332,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $18,900 $360,000 $1,331,100 $1,710,000
MoDOT Safety $2,100 $40,000 $147,900 $190,000
TIP #2020-15 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3195 Other $0
FHWA HSIP $9,000 $9,000
MoDOT Safety $1,000 $1,000
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA HSIP $4,736,700 $4,736,700
MoDOT Safety $526,300 $526,300
Local $0
Other $0
Total $21,000 $400,000 $6,752,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,173,000
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $7,173,000
Total Project Cost: $7,332,000
MoDOT
Project
Name:Intersection Improvements E
N
G
Description & Location: Intersection safety
improvements at various locations in Miller and
Cole County, including median openings on US
54.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Intersection Improvements E
N
G
Description & Location: Intersection safety
improvements at various locations in Boone
and Callaway County.
R
O
W
25
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2020-02 Local ORTA $2,865 $2,865
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA RTP $14,149 $14,148 $28,297
Local ORTA $7,060 $7,060 $14,120
Local COJ - P&R $750 $750 $1,500
Local Private $1,250 $1,250 $2,500
Total $0 $26,074 $23,208 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,282
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA Adv. Con.$247,200 $1,753,600 $2,000,800
MoDOT TCOS $61,800 $438,400 $500,200
TIP #2020-16 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3369 Other $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$328,800 $328,800
MoDOT TCOS $82,200 $82,200
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA Adv. Con.$8,550,400 $8,550,400
MoDOT TCOS $2,137,600 $2,137,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $309,000 $13,291,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,600,000
Description & Location: Upgrade pedestrian
facilities to comply with the ADA Transition Plan
at various locations in the Central District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: $7,130,000 Statewide Transportation
Alternatives funds. Potential Design/Build project.
Comments: Monetary donations provided by City of
Jefferson Parks and Recreation Department and
Midwest Block & Brick
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Updating Pedestrian Facilities E
N
G
Pedestrian & Bicycle Projects
Description & Location: Construction of 1.3 mi
of singletrack trail, features & signage, and 0.4
mi. kid's loop trail.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Binder Bike Park Phase 1 E
N
G
Total Project Cost: $49,282
Total Project Cost: $13,600,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Osage Region Trail Association
26
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
Other Pass. Fares $171,377 $173,091 $174,821 $176,570 $178,335 $874,194
MoDOT State Operating $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $11,415 $57,075
TIP #2011-04 Local General Fund $1,156,546 $1,179,677 $1,203,271 $1,227,336 $1,251,883 $6,018,713
MoDOT#FTA 5307 $793,880 $797,849 $801,838 $805,847 $809,877 $4,009,291
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $2,133,218 $2,162,032 $2,191,345 $2,221,168 $2,251,510 $0 $10,959,273
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $10,959,273
Description & Location: Operating Assistance
for JEFFTRAN service w ithin city limits of
Jefferson City (A 3% annual inflation factor
applied.)
Project
Name:Operating Assistance
Public Transportation Projects
Funding Prior
FundingCity of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
O
P
E
R
R
O
W
27
Figure 12 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
28
Program of Projects - OATS
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FHWA 5310 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-10 Local $0
MoDOT#Other OATS $50,000 $50,000 $100,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Source Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Future Totals
FTA 5310 $30,770 $40,000 $60,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $355,770
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-11 Local $30,770 $40,000 $60,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $355,770
MoDOT#Other $4,900 $5,000 $5,000 $5,100 $5,100 $5,100 $30,200
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $66,440 $85,000 $125,000 $155,100 $155,100 $155,100 $0 $741,740
Description & Location: Requesting
replacement/expansion vehicles to provide
service in Jefferson City and surrounding area
Total Project Cost: $741,740
OATS
Project
Name:Operating Assistance O
P
E
R
Capital Funding - Vehicles C
A
P
I
T
Funding
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Total Project Cost: $300,000
OATS
Project
Name:
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Description & Location: Within the Jefferson
City MPO Region-Section 5310-Seniors and
Individuals w ith Disablilities
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Funding Prior
Funding
29
Figure 13 - Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN
Item Description Total
Funding by
Others Local
1 Replace paratransit widebody cutaway buses 150,000$ $ 120,000 30,000$
2 Replace paratransit software and associated hardware 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
3 Replace low-floor minivan support vehicle 40,000$ -$ 40,000$
4 Replace transit administration vehicle 30,000$ 30,000$
5 Upgrade/replace fare card system 300,000$ 240,000$ 60,000$
6 Repair Transfer Facility Roof (Bus Transfer Shelter)12,000$ -$ 12,000$
7 Transit facility improvements--ridge cap/flashing replacements/roof repair on bus barn 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
8 Security upgrades for transit facilities 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
9 Replace outdated bus security camera systems 60,000$ 48,000$ 12,000$
10 Update/revise Transit facilities feasability study 150,000$ -$ 150,000$
11 Purchase and install bus shelters at various locations in Jefferson City 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
12 Transit facility improvements, including replace overhead doors and door operators 95,000$ 76,000$ 19,000$
13 JEFFTRAN lighted signs for exterior of transit facilities 15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
14 Purchase emergency back-up generator & switches for transit and CM facilities 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
15 Replace low-floor route buses 3,000,000$ 2,400,000$ 600,000$
16 Construct new new transit and central maintenace facilities 7,000,000$ 5,600,000$ 1,400,000$
17 Transit admin facility rehab 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
18 Purchase and install additional transit traveler kiosks (each)15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
19 Add bike racks at passenger transfer facilities and selected bus stops 5,000$ -$ 5,000$
20 Enhance/replace security systems for buses and transit facilities 20,000$ 16,000$ 4,000$
21 Charging systems/electrical upgrades for buses 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
22 Add crosswalks to various locations around the city 60,000$ -$ 60,000$
23 Rehabilitate/replace bus wash facility 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
JEFFTRAN Program of Projects
Illustrative Projects
30
Multimodal Projects
In 2015, CAMPO met with federal and state planning partners in a formal planning process review. Within two recommendations made, CAMPO
was urged to include more multi-modal projects into the TIP. CAMPO staff sent out written requests and reminders at CAMPO meetings for
projects, including those not using federal dollars. As of the writing of this document, no projects have been submitted.
However, there are a number of factors why these projects are limited. These types of projects are usually incorporated into new road projects.
Many of these types of projects are highly dependent on grants, which may or may not be annually awarded. Projects are usually decided each
budget year. There are several bicycle or pedestrian projects in the MTP illustrative list, but projects are not constrained and funds are not
obligated.
Regionally Significant Projects
In 2020, MoDOT has proposed a rehabilitation of the Rocheport Bridge, located along Interstate 70 over the Missouri River between Boone and
Howard Counties. During the duration of this project, travel inside the CAMPO region will be affected.
I-70, and thus Rocheport Bridge, is at the heart of national and regional distribution carrying approximately 100 million tons of freight, worth
more than $154 billion, annually. More than 20 percent of this freight is through-traffic, traveling from rural areas in the west on to New York,
New England, and the Mid-Atlantic. Rocheport Bridge is 60 years old and will only last 10 more years, even with the planned rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation of Rocheport Bridge will require closing two lanes for seven to nine months, with predicted traffic modeling of three to eight hour
backups. Rocheport Bridge carries 12.5 million vehicles per year, including 3.6 million trucks. While the surrounding area is rural, there are a
number of mid-sized cities within close proximity to the bridge – including Columbia and Jefferson City – and it connects Missouri’s two largest
cities of St. Louis and Kansas City. During traffic delays, long distance trucking would likely divert to Arkansas or Iowa to move across the U.S.,
while local traffic is expected to re-route on US Routes 40, 36, 63 and 50.
31
Appendix A – Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Amendments
TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Board
Approval
OneDOT
Approval
TIP Amendment 1
Administrative Modifications
TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Date
32
Appendix B – Federal Funding Sources
Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO planning area.
FHWA Program Eligible Activities
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/nhppfs.pd
f
The NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of
the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new
facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid
funds in highway construction are directed to support progress
toward the achievement of performance targets established in a
State's asset management plan for the NHS.
Surface Transportation Program (STP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/stbgfs.pdf
The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding
that may be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and
improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid
highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian
and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including
intercity bus terminals.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is to support a
significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all
public roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on
tribal lands
Transportation Alternatives (TA)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/transporta
tionalternativesfs.pdf
The FAST Act eliminates the MAP-21 Transportation Alternatives
Program (TAP) and replaces it with a set-aside of Surface
Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program funding for
transportation alternatives (TA). These set-aside funds include all
projects and activities that were previously eligible under TAP.
Railway-Highway Crossings (set-aside from HSIP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/railwayh
wycrossingsfst.pdf
This program funds safety improvements to reduce the number of
fatalities, injuries, and crashes at public grade crossings.
FTA Programs Eligible Activities
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/urbanized-
area-formula-grants-5307
This program provides grants to Urbanized Areas (UZA) for public
transportation capital, planning, job access and reverse commute
projects, as well as operating expenses in certain circumstances.
Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and
Individuals with Disabilities
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/enhanced-
mobility-seniors-individuals-disabilities-section-5310
This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons
with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special
needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public
transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
complementary paratransit services.
Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas
https://www.transit.dot.gov/rural-formula-grants-5311
This program provides capital, planning, and operating assistance to
states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations
less than 50,000, where many residents often rely on public transit to
reach their destinations.
Section 5329 Transit Safety & Oversight
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs
/5329_Safety_Program_Fact_Sheet.pdf
This section requires FTA to implement and maintain a national
public transportation safety program to improve the safety of all
public transportation systems that receive federal funding. The safety
program includes a national public transportation safety plan, a
safety certification training program, a public transportation agency
safety plan, and a state safety oversight program.
Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/busprogra
m
Provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses
and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities.
33
Appendix C – Policies and Procedures
Amendments
An amendment involves a major change to a project and requires approval by the Board of Directors and
Governor. An amendment is a revision that requires public review, allowance of comment, possible re-
demonstration of fiscal constraint, and includes at least one of the following:
• Addition or deletion of a project using FHWA or FTA funds (except as allowed as an administrative
modification),
• Major changes affecting project cost from FHWA or FTA sources (changes exceeding 20% of
FHWA or FTA sources of the existing project cost or changes over $2,000,000),
• Major changes in a project phase initiation date (greater than 12 months), or
• Major changes in design concept or design scope, such as changing project termini (more than 1/2
mile or 10% of the total length of the project, whichever is greater) or changing the number of
through traffic lanes that also includes a substantial increase in Federal cost.
Amendments will be initiated by the project sponsor. Amendments to delete a project can simply be
made via written correspondence identifying the project and why it is to be removed from the TIP.
Amendments to include a new project can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a
cover letter or remark in the comment section requesting inclusion in the TIP as an amendment.
Amendments for existing projects can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover
letter or remark in the comment section highlighting the change in the project and providing the CAMPO
TIP Number.
After an Amendment has been requested the process as follows:
• Staff will review the amendment for accuracy and to verify if an amendment is required or if the
change qualifies as an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if
necessary.
• The amendment will be placed on the next Technical Committee (TC) meeting agenda for review.
• The Technical Committee is an advisory board to the board of directors. Regardless of whether the
Technical Committee recommends approval of a project, does not recommend approval of a project,
or is unable to make a recommendation, the project shall still proceed to the Board of Directors to
make a final decision.
• If approval is recommended by the TC to the Board of Directors, staff will post the amendment notice
on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar day public comment period, send notices to the
appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next Board of Directors meeting agenda.
• At the Board of Directors Meeting, a public hearing will close the public comment period and a vote
for approval will be held.
If the project sponsor indicates an emergency situation upon submitting the amendment, staff will initiate
the public comment period, staff will post the amendment notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7
calendar day public comment period, send notices to the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on
the next Board of Directors meeting agenda. A public hearing will close the public comment period at the
next Board of Directors Meeting and hold a vote for approval. If this is not adequate to meet the
34
emergency situation, a special Board of Directors meeting may be called and proceed as outlined in the
Public Participation Plan.
Administrative Modifications
Revisions to the TIP and TIP projects that do not meet the criteria of an Amendment will be considered
administrative modifications including: minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to
funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation
dates. An administrative modification is a revision that neither requires committee action, public review
and comment, nor redemonstrates fiscal constraint.
An administrative modification will be initiated by the project sponsor by written communication to
CAMPO staff describing the change (phase cost, funding sources, or phase initiation date) warranting the
modification. Staff will review the administrative modification for accuracy and to verify qualification as
an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if necessary.
Upon CAMPO staff confirmation of the administrative modification requirements being met, staff will
modify the TIP appropriately, including noting the administrative modification in Appendix A of the TIP
and making changes to the project listing in the body of the TIP; notify the Board of Directors, Technical
Committee, MoDOT, FTA, and FHWA via email; draft a staff memo for the next Board of Directors and
Technical Committee meeting; and post the modified TIP notice on the CAMPO website for a minimum
of 7 calendar days.
Combining or Splitting Projects
Splitting a project into two or more projects or combining two or more projects can provide benefits to
project scheduling, cost, and logistics. A split or combination can be made via an administrative
modification to the TIP, if the project does not trigger a major change to the project as described in the
amendment section and the overall scope of work does not change.
When combining two or more projects, the financial and description information will be rolled up into the
project which was in the TIP originally and use the previous MPO TIP number. When splitting a project
into two or more projects, the financial and descriptive information will be separated appropriately into
several (two or more) projects using the same MPO TIP number, but the additional projects will include
alphabetic suffixes. The process for splitting or combining projects will follow the procedures of either
an amendment or administrative modification.
Compliance with Metropolitan Transportation Plan
For a project to be eligible for the TIP, it first must be included in the adopted MTP. Large capital
projects, roadway capacity, and/or general purpose roadway projects must be individually listed or clearly
part of a larger project included in the fiscally‐constrained component of the plan. Certain projects
seeking to improve safety, increase multi‐modal opportunities, or enhance the existing transportation
system may be programmed in the TIP without individual identification in the regional plan, so long as
they are consistent with the established goals and objectives of the plan.
35
Project Delay Policy
The goal of the Project Delay Policy for the Transportation Improvement Program is to maximize the
federal funding obligated each fiscal year and to enable the MPO to redirect funds to different projects if
any are inactive or otherwise limited from making progress. The Delay Policy applies to projects funded
through the programs for which CAMPO has oversight of project selection.
The intent of the Delay Policy is to provide an incentive for local agency sponsors to develop their
projects according to a detailed schedule and, thereby, to obligate the federal funds assigned to each
project within the timeframes initially shown in the TIP. The Delay Policy is primarily focused on
projects that involve construction or provide transportation improvements that are handled through
purchasing procedures.
In the context of this Delay Policy, a “delay” occurs when a construction-related project phase does not
get advertised within six months of the TIP program year in which its construction phase funding was
originally programmed, or changed with an amendment, in the TIP. For non-construction projects and
programs, a “delay” occurs when the “Notice to Proceed” is not issued within two months of the TIP
program year in which its implementation was originally funded in the TIP. The consequence of a delay
may be the withdrawal of its Federal funds from the TIP or other action by the Board.
Project Funding Information
When a new project is submitted for inclusion to the TIP, either during the initial development of the TIP
or as an amendment, the project sponsor is required to provide information regarding the local funding
sources in order to show fiscal constraint. The specific source of revenue, anticipated future, and any
other financial information needed to show fiscal constraint will be required.
Project Selection
The CAMPO Board of Directors adopted (Resolution 2010-04) a project prioritization and selection
process. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff and
reviewed by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of
Directors for a vote of approval. The Board of Directors may modify the project selection it deems
necessary.
Project Sponsor Commitment to Projects
Project sponsors hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring that project information contained in the TIP is
correct, that it accurately represents the scope of work being performed, and that the amount of funding
being requested is correct. The sponsor is responsible for providing CAMPO with an honest accounting
of project details including: costs, implementation schedules, and local matching fund sources, at the time
of the application for federal funds and anytime such details change. The project sponsor is also
responsible for reviewing the TIP after a project is included or modified to ensure correctness.
Scriveners’ Error
Errors made the in the ministerial functions of creating and maintaining the TIP, such as cartography,
typographical, spelling, minor word omissions, mathematical, and other error’s which do not alter the
36
intent of the TIP and have little or no impact can be performed by staff and shall not be considered a
revision to the TIP.
37
Appendix D – Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification
38
Appendix E – Definitions
Attainment area means any geographic area in which levels of a given criteria air
pollutant (e.g., ozone, carbon monoxide, PM10, PM2.5, and nitrogen dioxide)
meet the health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for
that pollutant. An area may be an attainment area for one pollutant and a
nonattainment area for others. A maintenance area (see definition below) is not
considered an attainment area for transportation planning purposes.
Available funds means funds derived from an existing source dedicated to or
historically used for transportation purposes. For Federal funds, authorized
and/or appropriated funds and the extrapolation of formula and discretionary
funds at historic rates of increase are considered available. A similar approach
may be used for State and local funds that are dedicated to or historically used
for transportation purposes.
Conformity means a Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) requirement that ensures
that Federal funding and approval are given to transportation plans, programs
and projects that are consistent with the air quality goals established by a State
Implementation Plan (SIP). Conformity, to the purpose of the SIP, means that
transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations, worsen
existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. The
transportation conformity rule (40 CFR part 93) sets forth policy, criteria, and
procedures for demonstrating and assuring conformity of transportation
activities.
Cooperation means that the parties involved in carrying out the transportation
planning and programming processes work together to achieve a common goal
or objective.
Coordination means the cooperative development of plans, programs, and
schedules among agencies and entities with legal standing and adjustment of
such plans, programs, and schedules to achieve general consistency, as
appropriate.
Design concept means the type of facility identified for a transportation
improvement project (e.g., freeway, expressway, arterial highway, grade
separated highway, toll road, reserved right-of-way rail transit, mixed-traffic rail
transit, or busway).
Design scope means the aspects that will affect the proposed facility’s impact on
the region, usually as they relate to vehicle or person carrying capacity and
control (e.g., number of lanes or tracks to be constructed or added, length of
project, signalization, safety features, access control including approximate
number and location of interchanges, or preferential treatment for high
occupancy vehicles).
Financial Plan means documentation required to be included with a metropolitan
transportation plan and TIP (and optional for the long-range statewide
transportation plan and STIP) that demonstrates the consistency between
reasonably available and projected sources of Federal, State, local, and private
revenues and the costs of implementing proposed transportation system
improvements.
Financially Constrained or Fiscal Constraint means that the metropolitan
transportation plan, TIP, and STIP includes sufficient financial information for
demonstrating that projects in the metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, and
STIP can be implemented using committed, available, or reasonably available
revenue sources, with reasonable assurance that the federally supported
transportation system is being adequately operated and maintained. For the TIP
and the STIP, financial constraint/fiscal constraint applies to each program year.
Additionally, projects in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas can be
included in the first two years of the TIP and STIP only if funds are available or
committed.
Illustrative Project means an additional transportation project that may (but is not
required to) be included in a financial plan for a metropolitan transportation
plan, TIP, or STIP if reasonable additional resources were to become available.
Maintenance Area means any geographic region of the United States that the EPA
previously designated as a nonattainment area for one or more pollutants
pursuant to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and subsequently
redesignated as an attainment area subject to the requirement to develop a
maintenance plan under section 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
Major Projects - These transportation improvements are defined as projects
receiving Federal financial assistance 1) with an estimated total cost of $500
million or more or 2) that have been identified by the FHWA as being a Major
Project. The designated projects may include those: 1) that require a substantial
amount of a State Transportation Agency's program resources, 2) that have a
high level of public or congressional attention, or 3) that have extraordinary
implications for the national transportation system.
Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) means the geographic area determined by
agreement between the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the area
and the Governor, in which the metropolitan transportation planning process is
carried out.
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) means the official multimodal
transportation plan addressing no less than a 20-year planning horizon that is
developed, adopted, and updated by CAMPO through the metropolitan
transportation planning process.
Nonattainment area means any geographic region of the United States that has
been designated by the EPA as a nonattainment area under section 107 of the
Clean Air Act for any pollutants for which an NAAQS exists.
Obligated projects means strategies and projects funded under title 23 U.S.C. and
title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for which the supporting Federal funds were
authorized and committed by the State or designated recipient in the preceding
program year, and authorized by the FHWA or awarded as a grant by the FTA.
Program of Projects (POP) is a list of projects to be funded in a grant application
submitted to FTA by a designated recipient. The POP lists the subrecipients and
indicates whether they are private non-profit agencies, governmental authorities,
or private providers of transportation service, designates the areas served
(including rural areas), and identifies any tribal entities. In addition, the POP
includes a brief description of the projects, total project cost, and Federal share
for each project.
Project selection means the procedures followed by MPOs, States, and public
transportation operators to advance projects from the first four years of an
approved TIP and/or STIP to implementation, in accordance with agreed upon
procedures.
Project sponsor must be a city, county, state, or other transportation related
government agency eligible to receive federal funding from the Federal
Highway or Federal Transit Administrations. All other entities must partner
with a city, county, or state agency to apply for and/or administer a
transportation project.
Public transportation operator means the public entity which participates in the
continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in
accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135 and 49 U.S.C. 5303 and 5304, and is the
designated recipient of Federal funds under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for
transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and continuing general or
special transportation to the public, but does not include school bus, charter, or
intercity bus transportation or intercity passenger rail transportation provided by
Amtrak.
Regionally significant project means a transportation project (other than projects
that may be grouped in the TIP and/or STIP or exempt projects as defined in
EPA’s transportation conformity regulation (40 CFR part 93)) that is on a
facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from
the area outside the region; major activity centers in the region; major planned
developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, or employment
centers; or transportation terminals) and would normally be included in the
modeling of the metropolitan area’s transportation network. At a minimum, this
includes all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities
that offer a significant alternative to regional highway travel.
Statewide transportation improvement program (STIP) means a statewide
prioritized listing/program of transportation projects covering a period of four
years that is consistent with the long-range statewide transportation plan,
metropolitan transportation plans, and TIPs, and required for projects to be
eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a document prepared by a
metropolitan planning organization that lists projects to be funded with
FHWA/FTA funds for the at least next one- to three-year period.
Unified Planning Work Plan (UPWP) is the management plan for the
(metropolitan) planning program. Its purpose is to coordinate the planning
activities of all participants in the planning process.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
2020-2024 Transportation Improvement Program Update
May 2, 2019
Summary
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be
implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which are funded by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed ‘regionally significant.’
The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with local jurisdictions, the Missouri Department of
Transportation, and local public transportation operators.
The CAMPO TIP year runs from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2024. This 5 year TIP includes 29 projects that total
over $86 million dollars to be spent in the CAMPO region. The TIP discusses federal performance measure
targets that have been reviewed by the Technical Committee and passed by the Board of Directors. It has
updated the financial data of the jurisdictions within the CAMPO region to demonstrate fiscal constraint,
which is the availability of local matching funds for federal transportation dollars from FHA or FTA.
Additionally, the TIP contains the Program of Projects that public transportation agencies are required to
create, and includes projects and costs, and an illustrative project list for JEFFTRAN.
Development of the 2020-2024 TIP has started. Included in the packet is a draft TIP with several changes
made since the last Technical Committee meeting. Changes include:
• Updating financial totals for all jurisdictions
• Updating list of fiscally constrained projects
• Updated the map of projects.
Staff Recommendation
Staff has worked extensively with local jurisdictions, public transportation providers, and MoDOT to
demonstrate fiscal constraint and show projects in the CAMPO region for the next five program years. All
jurisdictions active with CAMPO have consulted with staff to ensure financial details and projects are correct
and appropriate.
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to forward the Draft 2020-2024 Transportation Improvement Program to the Board of Directors for
review and approval, subject to technical corrections.
Agenda Item 6A
Metropolitan Transportation Plan
The Long Range Transportation Plan for the
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Adopted June 19, 2019
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration in
cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and
conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway
Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of Transportation.
DRAFT
Acknowledgement:
A large number of people took the time and effort to attend public meetings, respond to questions and
surveys, and attend working meetings. Without the dedication of local stakeholders, the CAMPO Board of
Directors, the CAMPO Technical Committee, and the residents of the CAMPO Region this plan would not be
possible.
CAMPO staff wishes to thank those who participated in the development of the plan.
Plan Produced by the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Consultant services for the development of the Travel Demand Model provided by HDR, Inc. and City Explained, Inc.
MPO Administration is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services/ Planning Division
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty Jefferson City, Missouri
Telephone 573-634-6410
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo/
DRAFT
Adoption Resolution
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Board of Directors
Chairman – Ron Fitzwater, City Council Member, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman –Jeff Hoelscher, Eastern District Commissioner, Cole County
City of Jefferson
Jon Hensley, City Council Member
David Kemna, City Council Member
Rick Mihalevich, City Council Member
Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning & Protective Services
Matt Morasch, PE, Director, Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Cole County
Larry Benz, PE, Director, Public Works
Doug Reece, City Administrator, St. Martins
Callaway County
Roger Fischer, Western District Commissioner
Holts Summit
Hanna Lechner, City Administrator, City of Holts Summit
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT)
David Silvester, PE, District Engineer
Ex-Officio Members
Randall Allen, Jefferson City Area Chamber of Commerce
Daniel Nguyen, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Joan Roeseler, MoDOT, Transit Section
Cathy Brown, Office of Administration, Facilities Management
Michael Henderson, AICP, MoDOT, Transportation Planning
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri
Marty Wilson, Callaway County Economic Development
Technical Committee
Chairman – Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning and Protective Services, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman – David Bange, PE, Engineering Supervisor, Department of Public Works, City of Jefferson
City of Jefferson
Todd Spalding, Director, Parks, Recreation & Forestry
Matt Morasch, PE, Director of Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Eric Barron, AICP, Transportation Planner
Britt Smith, PE, Operations & Maintenance
Cole County
Larry Benz, PE, Director of Public Works
Eric Landwehr, PE, County Engineer
Callaway County
Paul Winkelmann, PE, County Highway Administrator
Small City Representative - Callaway
Mark Tate, Streets Department, City of Holts Summit
Small City Representative - Cole
Paul Stonner/Brian Schrimpf, Alderman, Wardsville
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT)
Steve Engelbrecht, PE, District Planning Manager
Michael Henderson, AICP, Transportation Planning Specialist
Bob Lynch, PE, Area Engineer
Private Transportation Interest
Joe Scheppers, N.H. Scheppers Distributing Company.
Pedestrian or Biking Interest
Cary Maloney
Ex-Officio Members:
Daniel Nguyen, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri
- June 2019
CAMPO Staff
Sonny Sanders, AICP, GISP – Director, Planning & Protective Services
Eric Barron, AICP - Planning Manager
Katrina Williams, GISP, AICP – Planner II
Alex Rotenberry, AICP - Planner I
Beth Sweeten – Administrative Assistant
DRAFT
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................. i
1 Introduction & Federal Compliance .................................................................................................................. 1
What Is Campo? ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Federal Compliance ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Performance-Based Planning And Programing ...................................................................................................................... 6
MoDOT’s Long-Range Transportation Plan ............................................................................................................................. 8
Progress since 2013 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9
2 Planning Factors ............................................................................................................................................ 10
Safety & Security ....................................................................................................................................................................... 11
Accessibility, Mobility, & Connectivity .................................................................................................................................... 17
Environment & Quality of Life .................................................................................................................................................. 18
System Management, Preservation, & Resileincy ................................................................................................................. 20
Economic Vitality, Travel & Tourism ........................................................................................................................................ 21
3 Visioning & Plan Development ...................................................................................................................... 23
The Planning Process .................................................................................................................................................................. 26
Updating the Metropolitan Transportation Plan .................................................................................................................. 29
Incorporation Of Other Plans And Studies ............................................................................................................................ 30
Scenario Planning ....................................................................................................................................................................... 31
Travel Demand Model (TDM) Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 34
4 Regional Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 37
Population Trends ....................................................................................................................................................................... 37
Land Use ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 45
ZONING ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 46
Economic Activity ......................................................................................................................................................................... 46
5 The Transportation System ............................................................................................................................. 47
Roads and Bridges ..................................................................................................................................................................... 48
Pedestrian & Non-Motorized ................................................................................................................................................... 58
Transit ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 62
Air Travel ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 64
Waterways & Ports ................................................................................................................................................................... 65
Freight & Intermodal Facilities ................................................................................................................................................. 67
Rail ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 69
Trends In transportation ............................................................................................................................................................. 71
6 The Financial Plan & Implementation ............................................................................................................ 72
The Financial Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................... 73
Fiscal Constraint 2020-2024 ................................................................................................................................................... 74
Cost & Revenue Estimates ......................................................................................................................................................... 76
Local Funding Sources ................................................................................................................................................................ 91
State Funding Sources ................................................................................................................................................................ 93
Federal Funding sources ............................................................................................................................................................ 95
Implementation ............................................................................................................................................................................ 97
............................................................................................................................................................................ 1
APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................................................... 1
DRAFT
Appendix A Transportation Improvement Program
Appendix B 2016 Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
Appendix C 2017 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan
Appendix D Travel Demand Model Report
Appendix E System Performance Report
Appendix F MTP Planning Requirements - §450.324 CFR
Appendix G Major Thoroughfare Plan (will be completed in 2020)
Appendix H 2015 CAMPO Regional Wayfinding Plan
Appendix I Amendments & Modifications
Appendix J Surveys and Public Comments
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CAMPO Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FAST Act Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FTA 5303 Metropolitan & Statewide Planning and Non-Metropolitan Transportation Planning
FTA 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
FTA 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
FTA 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
MoDOT Missouri Department of Transportation
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
MTP Metropolitan Transportation Plan
NHFP National Highway Freight Program
NHPP National Highway Performance Program
ONE DOT Collaboration between FHWA and FTA
PBPP Performance Based Planning and Programming
POP Program of Projects
STIP State Transportation Improvement Program
STBG Surface Transportation Block Grant Program
TAP Transportation Alternatives
TCOS Taking Care of the System
TERM Transit Economic Requirements Model
TDM Travel Demand Model
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TPM Transportation Performance Management
VMT Vehicle Miles of Travel
DRAFT
This page intentionally left blank
DRAFT
Executive Summary
CAMPO 2045 & Beyond copy
Metropolitan Transportation Plan
THE LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION ORGANIZATION
The Capital Area Metropolitan Transportation Organization (CAMPO) is responsible for long range
multimodal transportation planning in an area that includes five communities and a population of more than
73,000. The CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), updated every five years, is the
Long Range Transportation Plan for the CAMPO. Looking to a 2045 planning horizon, and through a large
amount of stakeholder and public input, the MTP anticipates transportation trends and needs throughout the
CAMPO Region and includes goals and strategies to meet those needs.
The MTP contains tools and resources to assist CAMPO and member jurisdictions with the implementation.
The Implementation Plan outlined in Section 7 includes a schedule for addressing strategies and actions and
provides staff with guidance in the development of an annual work program.
The 2045 MTP addresses topics and processes that were not included in previous iterations, including;
Scenario Planning, a refined illustrative list, updated funding resources and projections, and a more concise
plan for implementation. Other plans, such as the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation
Plan and the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan have been better incorporated into the planning
process used in the development of this iteration of the MTP. The updated travel-demand model will provide
the foundation for the development of a Major Thoroughfare Plan.
The MTP also includes a Financial Plan, outlined in Section 6. This section includes information on funding
resources, forecasted revenue and lists fiscally constrained and unconstrained projects. The projects listed in
the Financial Plan are reflective of the plan’s goals, strategies and vision that guide the planning process.
VISION
Maintain and support a resilient multi-modal network that improves quality of life and promote economic vitality through
planning for smart community growth.
GOALS
1. Improve safety and security for all travel modes
2. Support economic development and tourism throughout the region
3. Support regional partnerships and planning continuity across the region.
4. Improve efficiency in system management, operations, and movement of people and freight
5. Support land use practices that promote quality of life and economic vitality
6. Seek secure and reliable funding
7. Improve accessibility and mobility
8. Maintain a resilient transportation system
9. Provide a platform for multi-modal transportation education
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
1
1 Introduction & Federal
Compliance
The MTP, also referred to as a Long-Range Transportation Plan,
assesses regional transportation needs over a twenty years planning
horizon. The MTP sets goals and defines policies, programs,
strategies, and projects to meet the transportation needs of the CAMPO
region. The MTP is central to the MPO planning process and
addresses all transportation modes, including the following:
• Surface Transportation (roads and bridges)
• Pedestrian and Non-Motorized
• Transit
• Air
• Waterways & Ports
• Freight
• Rail
Metropolitan transportation planning is the process of
examining travel and transportation issues and needs in
metropolitan areas. It includes a demographic analysis of
the community in question, as well as an examination of
travel patterns and trends. The planning process includes an
analysis of alternatives to meet projected future demands,
and for providing a safe and efficient transportation
system that meets mobility while not creating adverse
impacts to the environment. In metropolitan areas over
50,000 population, the responsibility for transportation
planning lies with designated Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPO).” – Federal Highway Administration
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
2
WHAT IS CAMPO?
CAMPO was formally established in March of 2003 and is the designated metropolitan planning
organization for the Jefferson City urbanized area. The CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area
(MPA), Figure 1.1, has an estimated population of more than 73,000 and includes the
jurisdictions of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, Wardsville, and portions of
unincorporated, non-urbanized Cole and Callaway Counties.
The boundary, based on US Census data, was created by the CAMPO Board of Directors and
approved by the Governor. The most recent boundary was approved in 2013.
CORE FUNCTIONS
• To establish and manage a fair and impartial setting for effective regional decision-
making in the metropolitan planning area.
• Evaluate transportation alternatives, scaled to the size and complexity of the region, to
the nature of its transportation issues, and to the realistically available options.
• Develop and update a Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the planning area covering
a planning horizon of at least 20 years that fosters (1) mobility and access for people
and goods, (2) efficient system performance and preservation, and (3) quality of life.
• Develop a Transportation Improvement Program based on the Metropolitan
Transportation Plan and designed to serve the area’s goals, using spending, regulating,
operating, management, and financial tools.
• Involve the general public and all the significantly affected sub-groups in the four
essential functions listed above.
Insert Photo
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
3
Insert Photo
Figure 1.1 CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area
Source: CAMPO
CAMPO BOARD OF DIRECTORS &
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
CAMPO is governed by a Board of Directors that
consists of representatives from jurisdictions within
the planning area and representatives from the
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT).
Federal transportation representatives serve as ex-
officio members. The Technical Committee consists
of representatives from the member jurisdictions’
professional staff and act in an advisory capacity.
A full list of members of the Board of Directors and
Technical Committee can be found at the front of
this document.
The Board of Directors is responsible for providing
official action on federally required plans,
documents, and programs. Additionally, the Board
is responsible for changes in the bylaws and
changes to the MPO boundary.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
4
Insert Graphic
REGIONAL COORDINATION
As a regional organization, CAMPO coordinates
and collaborates with a number of partners,
including: Missouri Department of Transportation
(MoDOT), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA),
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),
Chambers of Commerce, Convention and Visitors
Bureaus, the Mid-Missouri Regional Planning
Commission, and other various public and private
groups. Several meetings are held throughout the
year at the MoDOT Central District level to
encourage collaboration between regional
planning partners. These regional planning
partners are shown in Figure 1.2.
Collaboration with these partner agencies is
important in achieving CAMPO’s core functions and
responsibilities as listed above. This collaboration
provides the opportunity to coordinate planning
and implementation activities. Thus, efficiency is
improved and funding is maximized.
Figure 1.2 Planning Partners - MoDOT Central District
Source: CAMPO
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
5
FEDERAL COMPLIANCE
Development and maintenance of an MTP is a requirement for all Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPO). The MTP is prepared in accordance with federal statute 23 CFR Part
§450.324, which requires CAMPO to develop and update the MTP at least every 5 years to
maintain validity and consistency with current and forecasted transportation and land use
conditions. The MTP must be compliant with federal regulations issued by the United States
Department of Transportation (Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit
Administration), which governs the development of transportation plans and programs for
Urbanized Areas (UA).
A UA is comprised of a densely settled core of census tracts and/or census blocks that contains
50,000 or more in population plus the incorporated surrounding areas meeting size or density
criteria as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Federal law requires that every UA be
represented by an MPO which carries out the metropolitan transportation planning process for
the UA and surrounding planning area. CAMPO is the designated MPO for the Jefferson City
UA. The CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which encompasses the Jefferson City UA,
is depicted in Figure 1.3. The MPA encompasses 153 square miles.
An outline of the MTP requirements as stated in §450.324 CFR and how they are addressed in
the MTP can be found in Appendix F.
Figure 1.3 CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area and Urbanized Area
Source: CAMPO
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
6
PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMING
Performance-based Planning and Programing (PBPP) is a requirement of the Fixing America’s
Surface Transportation (FAST) Act and impacts both the MTP and the Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP). PBPP refers to the application of transportation performance
management (TPM) principles within the planning and programming processes of transportation
agencies to achieve desired performance outcomes for the multimodal transportation system.
CAMPO is required to use a performance-based approach to transportation decision making to
support the national federal highway performance goals listed below.
NATIONAL FEDERAL HIGHWAY PERFORMANCE GOALS
• Safety - To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all
public roads.
• Infrastructure Condition - To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state
of good repair
• Congestion Reduction - To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National
Highway System
• System Reliability - To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system
• Freight Movement and Economic Vitality - To improve the national freight network,
strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade
markets, and support regional economic development.
• Environmental Sustainability - To enhance the performance of the transportation
system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment.
• Reduced Project Delivery Delays - To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the
economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project
completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process,
including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies' work practices
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
7
FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The FAST Act continued a federal requirement for annual target setting collaboration between
State DOTs and planning partners on national performance measures. The System Performance
Report, part of the federal performance requirements, presents the condition and performance
of the transportation system with regard to performance measures, records performance targets,
and marks progress achieved in meeting the targets.
MPOs may choose between programing projects (1) in support of all the State targets, (2)
establishing specific numeric targets for all of the performance measures, or (3) establishing
specific numeric targets for one or more individual performance measures and supporting the
State target on other performance measures. The CAMPO Board of Directors has voted to
support state targets and measures in four areas listed below. Please note that there are
several additional targets MoDOT has adopted that CAMPO was not required to support that
are not listed below.
CAMPO’s performance measures and targets are outlined in detail in the System Performance
Report located in Appendix E.
•Number of Fatalities;
•Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million Vehicle Miles
traveled (VMT);
•Number of Serious Injuries;
•Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT; and
•Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-
motorized Serious Injuries
Safety
•percentage of pavements on the National Highway
System (NHS) in Good condition (excluding the
Interstate System)
•percentage of pavements on the NHS (excluding
the Interstate System) in Poor condition
•percentage of NHS bridges in Good condition
•percentage of NHS bridges in Poor condition
Pavement &
Bridge
•A measure that will assess the percent of reliable
person-miles traveled on the non-Interstate NHS.
Travel Time
Reliability &
Freight Reliability
•Asset Inventory
•Condition Assessment
•Management Approach – Decision Support Tools
•Investment Prioritization
Transit Asset
Management
(TAM)
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
8
MODOT’S LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The current MoDOT Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) was updated and approved by the
Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission and adopted on June 6, 2018. In addition to
collecting comments from stakeholders and the general public, the 2018 update included a large
amount of outreach and coordination with planning agencies around the state.
Like the CAMPO 2045 MTP, MoDOT’s LRTP is a 25-year vision for the state's transportation
system; establishing goals, objectives and performance management metrics. The LRTP analyzes
existing and emerging trends, both nationally and in Missouri. These trends included aging
populations, increases in urbanization, advancing technologies, and a younger population that
isn’t as interested in driving. The LRTP also included an analysis of emerging technology, such as
autonomous and connected vehicles (AV/CV), and their potential impact. Statewide system
needs and revenue forecasts are also identified in the LRTP. Figure 1.4, taken from the LRTP,
demonstrates the many high-priority unfunded annual needs.
Figure 1.4 Missouri High-Priority Unfunded Annual Transportation Needs
Source: Citizen’s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri (November 2018)
In order to meet transportation needs the LRTP outlines the following goals:
• Take care of the transportation system and services we enjoy today
• Keep all travelers safe, no matter the mode of transportation
• Invest in projects that spur economic growth and create jobs
• Give Missourians better transportation choices
• Improve reliability and reduce congestion on Missouri’s transportation system
The goals, as well as data and public input collected during the update of the LRTP have been
considered in the update of the CAMPO MTP. Most of the needs identified in the State’s LRTP
are identified in the CAMPO MTP and the MTP’s goals are reflective of those in the LRTP.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
9
PROGRESS SINCE 2013
The previous MTP was adopted in 2013. Since that time many projects, programs, and activities
have taken place throughout the region. Many of these achievements were outlined as strategies
or projects in the previous 2013-2035 MTP. It is important to highlight these achievements when
discussing long-range planning with the general public and stakeholders in the region.
Between 2013 and 2019 more than $203 Million in in transportation projects have been
completed using federal transportation funding, see Figure 1.5. This total does not include local
projects using local revenue.
Figure 1.5 Transportation Projects and activities completed in the CAMPO Region using federal transportation funding.
Transportation Projects and Activities 2013-2019 Total Cost
Road, Bridge, and Safety Projects $192,847,500
Pedestrian, Multi-Modal, and other Non-Motorized Projects $10,123,362
Consultant services for CAMPO studies, modeling, and planning $400,00
Scoping $740,000
Total $203,710,862
Source: Data compiled from Transportation Improvement Programs between 2013 and 2019.
The construction projects include rehabilitation of bridges and roads, pavement upgrades,
shoulders, new and updated sidewalks and trails. Consulting services resulted in a Wayfinding
Plan, an updated Travel Demand Model, and a transit study. Federal funds have also been
used for scoping and engineering projects such as looking at new configurations for intersections
or traffic studies.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
10
2 Planning Factors
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act includes 10
planning factors that are required to be considered as part of the MTP
development process. The planning factors are reflected in the goals,
strategies, and projects contained in this plan and are addressed in
greater detail throughout this section.
Economic
Vitality Safety
Security Accessibility &
Mobility
Environmental
Protection &
Quality of Life
System
Integration &
Connectivity
System
Management
& Operations
System
Preservation
Resilency &
Reliability
Travel &
Tourism
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
11
SAFETY & SECURITY
Planning for the safety and security of the transportation
network is central to several agencies and organizations at
the local, regional, state, and federal levels. The CAMPO
Region is home more than 73,000 people and includes a
complicated network of infrastructure, utilities, services, and
employment centers. The safety and security and of people
and resources is addressed cooperatively and
collaboratively by several planning partners throughout the
region, including transportation, public safety, and
emergency management agencies. Their relevant plans
and responsibilities are detailed further in this section.
SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The FAST Act requires target setting collaboration between
State DOTs and planning partners on national performance
measures such as safety. Targets were required to be set in
2017 for five safety performance measures. Annual
targets must be set by State DOTs, then by each MPO, with
the choice of adopting state targets or establishing their
own for:
• Number of Fatalities
• Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million Vehicle Miles
traveled (VMT)
• Number of Serious Injuries
• Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT
• Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-
motorized Serious Injuries
More information on safety performance measures can be
found in Appendix E.
CRASH STATISTICS
The Missouri State Highway Patrol and the MoDOT cooperate to report state-system roadway
crash statistics. Figures 4.1-3 provide a breakdown of crashes in the CAMPO region and
compare them to state-wide numbers.
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
2. INCREASE THE SAFETY OF
THE TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM FOR MOTORIZED AND
NON-MOTORIZED USERS;
3. INCREASE THE SECURITY OF
THE TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM FOR MOTORIZED AND
NON-MOTORIZED USERS;
CAMPO 2045 Goals:
Goal 1: Improve safety and
security for all travel modes.
Goal 3: Support regional
partnerships and planning
continuity across the region.
Goal 4: Improve efficiency in
system management,
operations, and movement
of people and freight.
Goal 6: Seek secure and
reliable funding.
Goal 7: Improve accessibility
and mobility.
Goal 8: Maintain a resilient
transportation system.
.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
12
Figure 4.1 Fatal and Disabling Injury Crashes 2013-2017
Source: MoDOT, MSHP
Figure 4.2 Crashes by Type: 2013-2017
Number of Crashes by type
Fatal Disabling Injury Minor Injury Property Damage Total Crashes
CAMPO State CAMPO State CAMPO State CAMPO State CAMPO State
2013 5 683 61 3,938 289 26,604 1,115 88,455 1470 119680
2014 6 696 42 3,706 329 28,343 1,130 93,490 1507 126235
2015 5 803 35 3,703 354 32,973 1,149 109,491 1543 146970
2016 7 873 37 3,894 391 35,978 1,255 116,649 1690 157394
2017 5 866 29 3,672 359 35,823 1,135 114,495 1528 154856
Total 28 3921 204 18913 1722 159,721 5784 522580 7738 705135
Source: MoDOT, MSHP 2017 Data
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
13
Figure 4.3 Number of Injuries by Type: 2013-2017
Number of Injuries by type
Total Number
Killed
Total Number Disabling
Injuries
Total Number Minor
Injuries
Total Number Killed or
Injured
CAMPO State CAMPO State CAMPO State CAMPO State
2013 5 757 76 4,937 422 39,543 503 45237
2014 7 766 59 4,660 480 41,522 546 46948
2015 8 870 45 4,574 506 49,049 559 54493
2016 8 948 45 4,744 546 52,920 599 58612
2017 6 933 42 4,882 536 52,762 584 58577
Total 34 4274 267 23797 2490 235,796 2791 263867
Source: MoDOT, MSHP 2017 Data
MISSOURI COALITION FOR ROADWAY SAFETY
The Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety (MCRS) is a wide ranging group of safety advocates
who originally came together in 2004 to create Missouri's Blueprint for Safer Roadways.
Planning partners include law enforcement, educators, emergency responders, and engineers
who have launched statewide efforts to reduce fatalities and create safer roads in Missouri.
The Coalition is responsible for the implementation of several safety campaigns, including:
• Seatbelt Use
• Work Zone Awareness
• Impaired Driving
• Pedestrian Safety Awareness
• Distracted Driving
• Commercial Motor Vehicle Awareness
• Motorcycle Awareness
• Youth Alcohol Enforcement
• Child Passenger Safety
The Blueprint, Missouri’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (HSP)
Missouri’s Blueprint – A partnership Toward Zero Deaths is a collective effort of the MCRS and
safety professionals throughout the state. The MCRS leads the charge to implement the Blueprint
and encourages safety partners to focus their activities and programs in support of the “Focused
Five” and subsequent emphasis areas, focus areas, and strategies. The state is divided into
seven regional coalitions that develop annual safety plans. These coalition’s meet on a regular
basis to discuss their concerns, review how their countermeasures are working, and consider ways
to improve their efforts. Approximately $2 million of state road funds is dedicated to this effort.
The Blueprint is an overarching strategic highway safety plan for the State of Missouri while the
state’s Highway Safety Plan serves as one of the implementation components in support of the
Blueprint efforts.
According to the HSP, Missouri’s ultimate Blueprint goal is that NO lives are lost due to a traffic
crash. However, an interim goal of 700 or fewer fatalities must be met in order to reach ZERO
deaths.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
14
CAMPO staff participates to MCRS meetings and provides support to planning partners as
needed to assist in meeting the above goal. Staff receives crash data annually from MoDOT
and uses this and other datasets to provide regional partners with maps and statistics as
requested. Additionally, staff provides a quarterly crash report to the CAMPO Technical
Committee and Board of Directors.
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY
There are several plans, documents, or initiatives in the CAMPO Region in addition the strategies
in the MTP that address the infrastructure and safety needs of pedestrians and bicyclists:
• Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
• Jefferson City Area Greenway Master Plan
• Holts Summit Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Plan
• Missouri Boulevard Safety Assessment
• Jefferson City Sidewalk Plan
• Healthy Schools Healthy Communities Program
Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
The Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan, adopted in 2016, is intended as a resource to
improve safety, connectivity, and mobility for pedestrian and bicycle users in the CAMPO
planning area. The goals, recommendations, and strategies outlined in the plan can be used by
jurisdictions to develop an individualized implementation strategy to fit the unique pedestrian
and bicycle needs of that community. The plan is also intended to be a guide for future growth
by recommending strategies, policies, and procedures to guide future development and improve
existing infrastructure.
The process to develop the plan included intensive amount of public outreach that facilitate the
development of goals and strategies that would improve conditions for pedestrians and
bicyclists. The plan has been used by Jefferson City, Holts Summit, and St. Martins in the
development of grant applications seeking to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety in their
communities. Both Jefferson City and St. Martins adopted the plan.
The Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan can be found in Appendix B.
Missouri Boulevard Safety Assessment
In September 2014, United States Department of Transportation Secretary, Anthony Foxx,
launched “Safer People, Safer Streets” with the goal of reducing the growing number of
pedestrian, transit user, and bicyclist injuries and fatalities across the United States. As part of
this ongoing initiative, US Department of Transportation field offices are convened transportation
agencies to conduct road safety assessments in every state, launching a Mayors' Challenge for
Safer People and Safer Streets, and working with University Transportation Centers (UTCs) and
other stakeholders to identify and remove barriers to improving non-motorized safety. In 2016,
Jefferson City joined Kansas City in being the first two cities in the State of Missouri to have
conducted this type of safety assessment as part of the Safer People, Safer Streets initiative.
The 3.4 mile assessment of Missouri Boulevard qualitatively estimated and reported on potential
safety issues and identified opportunities for improvement. The assessment followed a model
used by federal partners who had conducted similar assessments across the United States. The
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
15
project was a collaborative effort by CAMPO and several planning partners, including;
Jefferson City Police Department, Jefferson City Public Works, JEFFTRAN (Jefferson City Transit),
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Capital Region Medical Center, and Mid-America Regional Council.
The Missouri Boulevard Safety Assessment has been cited by Jefferson City staff in seeking
funding for or planning for improvements to the corridor. The assessment is available on the
CAMPO website at www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING
Hazard mitigation is the effort to reduce loss of life and property by lessening the impact of
disasters. It is most effective when implemented under a comprehensive, long-term mitigation
plan. The plans identify risks and vulnerabilities associated with natural disasters, and develop
long-term strategies for protecting people and property from future hazard events. Mitigation
plans are key to breaking the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage.
Developing hazard mitigation plans enables state, tribal, and local governments to:
• Increase education and awareness around threats, hazards, and vulnerabilities;
• Build partnerships for risk reduction involving government, organizations, businesses, and
the public;
• Identify long-term, broadly-supported strategies for risk reduction;
• Align risk reduction with other state, tribal, or community objectives;
• Identify implementation approaches that focus resources on the greatest risks and
vulnerabilities; and
• Communicate priorities to potential sources of funding.
Moreover, a FEMA-approved hazard mitigation plan is a condition for receiving certain types of
non-emergency disaster assistance, including funding for mitigation projects. Ultimately, hazard
mitigation planning enables action to reduce loss of life and property, lessening the impact of
disasters.
Both Callaway and Cole Counties have approved Hazard Mitigation Plans. These plans include
data and strategies that address the impacts of natural and man-made disasters on the
transportation system. In addition to evaluating eleven natural hazards, the plan evaluates risks
associated with major rail or air transportation incidents, mass casualty events, and hazardous
materials release. All of these hazards can impact the transportation network and the people
and resources dependent upon that network.
The plans include a mitigation strategy that lays out prioritized actions and incorporates benefits
and costs associated with implementation of those actions. The plans can be found on the Mid-
MO RPC website at www.midmorpc.org.
THE STRATEGIC HIGHWAY NETWORK (STRAHNET)
The Strategic Highway Network is critical to the Department of Defense's (DoD's) domestic
operations. According FHWA, The STRAHNET is a 62,791-mile system of roads deemed
necessary for emergency mobilization and peacetime movement of heavy armor, fuel,
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
16
ammunition, repair parts, food, and other commodities to support U.S. military operations. Even
though DoD primarily deploys heavy equipment by rail, highways play a critical role.
The Surface Deployment and Distribution Command Transportation Engineering Agency
(SDDCTEA) is the DoD designated agent for public highway matters, including STRAHNET and
STRAHNET Connectors. The SDDCTEA identified STRAHNET and the Connector routes in
coordination with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the State transportation
departments, the military Services and installations, and the ports. Together, STRAHNET and the
Connectors define the total minimum defense public highway network needed to support a
defense emergency.
While the CAMPO Region does not include any STRAHNET routes or connectors, it does include
the intersection of three US Highways that provide additional connectivity to these routes.
Interstate 70, which lies 25 miles north, is a designated STRAHNET route. Fort Leonard Wood
and Whiteman Air Force Base are both located within 80 miles of the CAMPO Region and are
directly connected to the STRAHNET. Jefferson City is also home to the Missouri National Guard
Headquarters, which does use the network for the movement of certain equipment and would be
dependent upon it during certain types of activation.
RAIL SAFETY
There is only one Class I double track rail line and a short spur that runs through the CAMPO
Region, supporting both passenger and freight service. Owned by Union Pacific, that connects
St. Louis and Kansas City. Safety concerns in the CAMPO Region include at-grade crossings,
pedestrian access to tracks, and general rail car safety. While CAMPO has minimal interaction
with rail activity and safety, this mode is addressed the goals and strategies of the MTP.
CAMPO may provide support to regional planning partners or member jurisdictions in accessing
data or applying for grants to meet these strategies.
Missouri Highway-Rail Crossing Safety Program
Under MoDOT’s Multimodal Operations Division-Railroad Section, Missouri’s Highway-Railroad
Crossing Safety Program aims to improve highway-rail grade crossings throughout the state. The
program is funded by a combination of federal and state funds. The FHWA Section 130
Program is a federal aid program authorized by United States Code Title 23, Section 130, and
administered through the state by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The state
Grade Crossing Safety Account is funded by a 25 cent assessment on all Missouri motor vehicle
registrations or renewals authorized by Section 389.612, RSMO.
According to MoDOT, Missouri receives $6 million in Section 130 funds and another $1.2 million
per year through the state’s Grade Crossing Safety Account. These funds can only be spent on
improvements at public crossings for safety devices like flashing lights, gates or warning bells;
pavement markings; or the closure of a crossing. Every year public crossings are reviewed
taking into account factors like train and vehicle traffic counts, train and vehicle speed, sight
distance and accident history to select crossings for improvements.
Missouri has seen dramatic reduction in rail related safety accidents and injuries since the late
1970’s:
• Rail Collisions – reduced by 87%
• Rail Fatalities – reduced by 98%
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
17
• Rail Injuries – reduced by 82%
MoDOT’s Multimodal Operations Division-Railroad Section also administers a Rail Safety
Inspection Program and conducts a railroad safety outreach activities.
AIR SAFETY
Jefferson City Memorial Airport is the sole airport in the CAMPO region. It is a general aviation
facility with no commercial airline passenger services. CAMPO has been only minimally involved
in airport planning but is available if contacted for any type of data or planning assistance.
Jefferson City Memorial Airport began development of an updated Airport Master Plan in
2018. This plan will address a wide range of needs and opportunities including improvements to
the control tower.
MoDOT’s Aviation Section performs airport safety inspections at all public use general aviation
airports in Missouri; inspecting them once every three years. Inspections focus on identifying
safety concerns such as obstructions in the runway protection zones, nonstandard lighting and
pavement markings, and poor pavement conditions.
ACCESSIBILITY, MOBILITY, &
CONNECTIVITY
Increasing accessibility and mobility options in the region
has been identified as a need by residents and
stakeholders in the region. It is important to understand the
various transportation needs of the region and
acknowledge the balance necessary to provide accessibility
for both people and freight. Land use and transportation
policies are important tools used to create more compact
development patterns at activity centers that enhance the
efficient movement of people and freight through the
system.
CAMPO has been involved in several projects and
programs aimed at improving accessibility and mobility in
the region. Many of these activities have been highlighted
in other sections of the MTP. In addition to the goals set in
the MTP to address these planning factors, CAMPO has
been involved in the following activities:
• Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
• Missouri Boulevard Safety & Transit Assessment
• Support of the Heartland Port Authority
• Funding support for traffic studies and support of
scoping activities to improve intersections
• Mapping and publication support to JEFFTRAN
• Staff attendance at ADA compliance training
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
4. INCREASE ACCESSIBILITY
AND MOBILITY OF PEOPLE AND
FREIGHT
6. ENHANCE THE
INTEGRATION AND
CONNECTIVITY OF THE
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM,
ACROSS AND BETWEEN
MODES, FOR PEOPLE AND
FREIGHT
CAMPO 2045 Goals:
Goal 1: Improve safety and
security for all travel modes.
Goal 6: Seek secure and
reliable funding.
Goal 7: Improve accessibility
and mobility.
Goal 8: Maintain a resilient
transportation system.
Goal 9: Provide a platform
for multi-modal
transportation education.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
18
ENVIRONMENT & QUALITY OF LIFE
The MTP’s vision of improving quality of life is
complimented by addressing the resiliency and reliability
of the transportation system as it relates to the
preservation and conservation of the environment. The
MTP includes many goals and strategies that provide for
consideration of environmental impacts such as supporting
tourism, improving accessibility to recreational and
cultural opportunities, improving transit, regional
collaboration, congestion improvements, and providing
opportunities for public engagement.
The CAMPO region and Mid-Missouri as a whole is home
to several important natural resources, open spaces,
outdoor recreational opportunities, and cultural and
historic attractions. The transportation system should
support these resources and attractions in order to
improve quality of life throughout the region.
The Missouri River bisects the CAMPO region and
flooding stemming from upstream dam releases and
localized rainfall are a constant concern in the region.
Additional issues with flash flooding also present
challenges when planning for changes in land use and
transportation improvements. Figure 4.4 depicts the 100
year floodplain in the CAMPO region. The 100 year
floodplain represents areas with a 1% annual chance of
flooding. The areas shown in the map have experienced
varying amounts of flooding throughout recorded history.
Major floods in 1993, 1995, 2007, and 2011 produced
major impacts on the transportation system.
CAMPO invites comment from
environmental agencies and groups in
the region and continues to encourage
comment and participation from these
stakeholders.
Source: USGS July, 1993 - Aerial view of the Missouri River flooding on July 30, 1993 north of Jefferson City, Missouri, looking south.
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
5. PROTECT AND ENHANCE
THE ENVIRONMENT, PROMOTE
ENERGY CONSERVATION,
IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE,
AND PROMOTE CONSISTENCY
BETWEEN TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENTS AND STATE
AND LOCAL PLANNED
GROWTH AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
CAMPO 2045 Goals:
Goal 1: Improve safety and
security for all travel modes.
Goal 2: Support economic
development and tourism
throughout the region
Goal 3: Support regional
partnerships and planning
continuity across the region.
Goal 4: Improve efficiency in
system management,
operations, and movement
of people and freight
Goal 5: Support land use
practices that promote
quality of life and economic
vitality
Goal 6: Seek secure and
reliable funding.
Goal 7: Improve accessibility
and mobility.
Goal 8: Maintain a resilient
transportation system.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
19
Figure 4.4 Population Density (Persons Per Square Mile)
Source: FEMA
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
20
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT,
PRESERVATION, & RESILEINCY
CAMPO works closely with staff from member jurisdictions,
MoDOT, and Federal Partners to develop plans and
projects that seek to enhance system management,
preservation, & resiliency. Efforts are made for early
collaboration between CAMPO, local jurisdictions, and the
state to ensure that plans and projects are implemented as
efficiently as possible. While CAMPO does not have
funding to implement projects at this time, staff is
available to assist with facilitation, education, and
planning.
MODOT’S TRANSPORTATION ASSET
MANAGEMENT PLAN (TAMP)
Federal legislation has required each state to complete a
Transportation Asset Management Plan that includes
inventory, condition, life cycle cost, and a financial plan
to maintain its system.
Transportation asset management is a strategic
framework for making cost-effective decisions about
allocating resources and managing infrastructure. It is
based on a process of monitoring the physical condition of
assets, predicting deterioration over time and providing
information on how to invest in order to maintain or
enhance the performance of assets over their useful life.
MoDOT’s Transportation Asset Management Plan is a
crucial element in achieving MoDOT’s strategic goal of
keeping roads and bridges in good condition. The TAMP
ensures MoDOT is using taxpayer money wisely by:
• Minimizing life cycle costs
• Maximizing system performance
• Supporting an objective decision making process
• Balancing public expectations with limited funding to create a sustainable plan
The TAMP is updated annually with the assistance of planning partners such as CAMPO.
CAMPO integrates data from the TAMP into planning documents and studies.
LOCAL SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING
Local jurisdictions regularly collect data on system condition and track condition and capacity.
This is done through collecting traffic counts on road segments, bridges, and intersections; or by
conducting studies on traffic flow, pavement condition, or material strength. This locally collected
data is utilized by CAMPO staff, MoDOT staff, and others to facilitate projects and program
that will improve system performance and resiliency.
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
7. PROMOTE EFFICIENT
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND
OPERATION
8. EMPHASIZE THE
PRESERVATION OF THE
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM
9. IMPROVE THE RESILIENCY
AND RELIABILITY OF THE
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
AND REDUCE OR MITIGATE
STORMWATER IMPACTS OF
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
CAMPO 2045 Goals:
Goal 3: Support regional
partnerships and planning
continuity across the region.
Goal 4: Improve efficiency in
system management,
operations, and movement
of people and freight.
Goal 7: Improve accessibility
and mobility.
Goal 8: Maintain a resilient
transportation system.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
21
ECONOMIC VITALITY, TRAVEL &
TOURISM
According to the Missouri Division of Tourism, travel supports
3,680 tourism jobs in Cole County and visitor expenditures in
Cole County’s tourism-related industries were $144,254,234
in 2018. The CAMPO region includes 88% of Cole County’s
population and the Missouri State Capitol, Jefferson City.
An efficient transportation system is an integral part of the
regional economy and, in turn, travel and tourism. CAMPO
partners with member jurisdictions, state agencies, and
private industry to ensure transportation is supportive of
broader economic development initiatives. Annually, CAMPO
coordinates with MoDOT and other regional planning
partners to prioritize and program transportation projects as
part of the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
process.
A transportation system is a crucial component of facilitating
travel and tourism throughout the area and CAMPO works
closely with partners such as the Jefferson City Chamber of
Commerce, Convention and Visitors Bureau, Mid-Missouri
Regional Planning Commission and other local organizations
to promote awareness of regional concerns.
The CAMPO region is home to several important historic sites,
annual events, and recreational opportunities that draw many
visitors from around the state and the nation, including:
• Missouri State Capitol
• Missouri State Museum
• Missouri Supreme Court
• Missouri State Penitentiary Historic Site
• Governor’s Mansion
• Katy Trail State Park
• Annual festivals in local communities
FAST ACT PLANNING
FACTORS:
1. SUPPORT THE ECONOMIC
VITALITY OF THE
METROPOLITAN AREA,
ESPECIALLY BY ENABLING
GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS,
PRODUCTIVITY, AND
EFFICIENCY
10. ENHANCE TRAVEL AND
TOURISM
CAMPO 2045 Goals:
Goal 1: Improve safety and
security for all travel modes.
Goal 2: Support economic
development and tourism
throughout the region.
Goal 3: Support regional
partnerships and planning
continuity across the region.
Goal 4: Improve efficiency in
system management,
operations, and movement
of people and freight.
Goal 5: Support land use
practices that promote
quality of life and economic
vitality.
Goal 6: Seek secure and
reliable funding.
Goal 7: Improve accessibility
and mobility.
Goal 8: Maintain a resilient
transportation system.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
22
MISSOURI STATE PENITENTIARY REDEVELOPMENT
Authorized in 1832 and approved by the General Assembly in 1833, the Missouri State
Penitentiary was the first prison built west of the Mississippi River. A portion of this historic site is
owned by the Missouri State Office of Administration and another portion by the City of
Jefferson. The tourist site had more than 33,000 visitors in 2016 according to the Jefferson City
New Tribune.
The site is a focal point for tourism and economic development in the region. Future development
of the site will include housing, office space, restaurants, new roads and pedestrian access that
will be developed in coordination with local stakeholders.
Source: Missouri Office of Administration
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
23
3 Visioning & Plan
Development
The MTP was developed through the use of inclusive public outreach,
integration of federal planning factors, and scenario planning resulting in
the development of the goals and strategies listed in the previous section.
The development process followed a national policy of facilitating a
“continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive performance-based
multimodal” process.
CAMPO
2045 &
Beyond
MTP
Planning
Factors
National
Goals
Performance
Measures
Stakeholder/
Public Input State Goals
Data
Analysis
Scenario
Planning
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
24
The Vision:
MAINTAIN AND SUPPORT A RESILIENT MULTI-MODAL
NETWORK THAT IMPROVES QUALITY OF LIFE AND
PROMOTE ECONOMIC VITALITY THROUGH PLANNING
FOR SMART COMMUNITY GROWTH.
GOALS & STRATEGIES
The following list of strategies was developed input from stakeholders and public surveys to aid
in achieving the goals listed above. These strategies provide guidance to staff and the CAMPO
Board of Directors in developing work programs, policies, and projects.
1. Improve safety and security for all travel modes
a. Identify locations for safety improvements
b. Improve collaboration between CAMPO and public safety agencies
c. Assist with railroad related safety and access improvements such as the
boarding platform, crossings, and right-of-way areas
d. Encourage collaboration between law enforcement and transit agencies
concerning security camera use
2. Support economic development and tourism throughout the region
a. Seek funding and provide support for improvements and access to the
airport, transit, and the river port
b. Improve accessibility to recreational and cultural opportunities
c. Expanding wayfinding throughout the region
d. Support creation of shuttle services for local and regional events
3. Support regional partnerships and planning continuity across the region.
a. Develop data in support of member jurisdictions’ comprehensive plans
b. Provide a forum for sharing planning best practices or processes
c. Strengthen collaboration with regional planning agencies
4. Improve efficiency in system management, operations, and movement of people
and freight
a. Maintain and update a regional travel demand model
b. Support access management programs
c. Identify current or potential congestion locations or bottlenecks
d. Identify potential locations for connection improvements
e. Improve existing inter-modal and multi-modal facilities
f. Support improvements to freight and people movement via rail, air, and
river port access
g. Improve inter-city and inter-regional transit operations and connectivity
h. Improve parking and services specific to freight hauler needs
i. Support development and implementation of local parking studies
5. Support land use practices that promote quality of life and economic vitality
a. Develop and maintain land use data in support of MPO and regional
planning partner needs
b. Support member jurisdictions’ plans for connectivity to parks, trails, and
open space
c. Provide mapping and data development support to local communities
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
25
6. Seek secure and reliable funding
a. Provide assistance to regional stakeholders in seeking grants and
completing applications
b. Maintain a prioritized comprehensive list of illustrative transportation
projects
c. Continue to maintain a Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
d. Maintain a list of funding sources and opportunities
e. Alert member jurisdictions of available funding resources as they are
announced
f. Collaborate with regional partners in leveraging funds or applying for
grants
7. Improve accessibility and mobility
a. Identify barriers to accessibility and mobility (sidewalks, crosswalks, signals,
signage, etc.)
b. Support development of ADA transition plans among member jurisdictions
c. Support improvements to and expansion of passenger rail service
d. Maintain and update the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
e. Maintain and update the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan
f. Review and update documents that support improvements to accessibility
such as the Title VI Plan, Limited English Proficiency Plan (LEP), and Public
Participation Plan (PPP)
8. Maintain a resilient transportation system
a. Encourage preservation of motorized and non-motorized transportation
corridors for future growth
b. Maintain a database of existing infrastructure and assets for use by
regional partners
c. Develop and maintain an accurate Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP)
d. Provide support in maintaining the MoDOT Transportation Management
System (TMS)
e. Support implementation of individual or collaborative pavement and bridge
management systems
f. Maintain an updated performance management plan
9. Provide a platform for multi-modal transportation education
a. Facilitate, promote and participate in local and regional educational
activities
b. Develop and disseminate educational tools and resources such as brochures,
maps, videos, and other media
c. Maintain a consistent public outreach schedule to keep members, planning
partners, and the public informed about new innovations or transportation
trends
d. Strengthen CAMPO’s social media presence
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
26
THE PLANNING PROCESS
In the spring of 2017, the CAMPO Board of Directors moved forward with a full update of the
entire Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The Technical Committee members were the key
reviewers during in the update of the plan. A full list of participants of Technical Committee
members is located at the front of this plan.
Source: CAMPO Staff – October, 2018 Holts Summit Open House
PUBLIC OUTREACH
From Fall 2018 to Spring of 2019 several meetings and public outreach events were held to
collect input, including; eight Technical Committee meetings, two Board of Directors meetings,
three stakeholder meetings, one workgroup meeting, two open house events. All of these
meetings and events are listed below.
• Technical Committee Meeting – September 6, 2018
• Technical Committee Meeting – October 4, 2018
• Open House (Jefferson City) – October 10, 2018
• Open House (Holts Summit) – October 16, 2018
• Technical Committee Meeting – November 1, 2018
• Stakeholder Meeting – November 13, 2018
• Technical Committee Meeting – December 6, 2018
• Technical Committee Meeting – February 7, 2019
• Technical Committee Meeting – March 7, 2019
• Open House – March 19, 2019
• Work Group Meeting – March 26, 2019
• Technical Committee Meeting – April 4, 2019
• Technical Committee Meeting – May 2, 2019
• Board of Directors Meeting – May 15, 2019
• Board of Directors Meeting – June 19, 2019
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
27
Topics at these meetings or events included discussion and identification of problem areas,
opportunities for improvement, and gaps in connectivity. Meeting participants provided staff
with data and insight that facilitated the development of goals, strategies, projects, programs,
and policies that would further the MTP vision.
In addition to the public meetings and committee meetings CAMPO also invited comment and
participation of several other stakeholders including:
• Local Law Enforcement
• State and Federal Agencies
• Private Schools
• Tourism Promoters
• Local Non-Profits and Advocacy Groups
OUTREACH TO CAMPO JURISDICTIONS
Presentations were given and/or meetings held with each CAMPO jurisdiction during the
development of the plan. Each jurisdiction was given the opportunity provide input on the
development of the goals, strategies, and projects in the MTP. Presentations were made at
Zoning Commission meetings in Holts Summit and Jefferson City.
STAKEHOLDER SURVEYS
A survey was sent to all member jurisdictions, board members, and technical committee members
requesting input on short term and long term needs throughout the region. The questionnaire was
used to identify high-priority needs and possible solutions. Stakeholders were asked to think
about these needs in two categories; Near-Term (<5 years) and Long-Term (beyond 5 years).
Needs Identified by Stakeholders
Congestion on US 54/63 North of the Missouri River
Bridge
US 50/63/Rex-Whitton Expressway Congestion
Improvements.
Safety and congestion issues at Dix Road and US50 Halifax, Nieman & Major Intersection Improvements
Safety and congestion issues at Clark Avenue, US
50/63, and Dunkin
E. Simon drainage improvements
West Edgewood and Stadium Intersection
Improvements
US 54 in Holts Summit - Pedestrian access across
highway on Central and E. Simon
Missouri Boulevard Capacity/Safety Bald Hill and Seven Hills Intersection improvements
Safety Improvements on W. Truman at Scott Station
Road and Ventura Ave.
Sidewalks in Holts Summit along Karen, Halifax, and S.
Summit
Safety Improvements at Swifts Hwy/Jefferson St. Katy Trail connectivity to Holts Summit
Safety and congestion issues Christy Drive/ Tanner
Bridge/ Jefferson/ US 54
U 54 interchange improvements at Ellis, Southwest, and
Stadium.
Madison Street Safety and Capacity Issues Tri-level Improvements (US50,63, 54 interchange)
South Summit Drive sidewalk, drainage, and
intersection improvements
Extension of runways at Jefferson City Memorial Airport
Spalding Road and Park Place Drainage issues Construction of new transit facilities for JEFFTRAN
Van Horn & Julie Lane intersection improvements Rt T/D and US 50 intersection and pedestrian issues
Greenway crossings and extensions Construction of a port on the Missouri River
Renovation or replacement of the Amtrak Train Station
in Jefferson City
Additional overpass exit ramps at South Summit and US-
54 in Callaway County
intersection improvements at Routes B, M, W, and
Ashbury Way in Wardsville
South Country Club and US 50 Interchange
Improvements
Bike Lane installation E. Miller St. Roadway improvements
Ellis Boulevard and Moreau Drive Intersection
improvements
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
28
PUBLIC COMMENTS
More than 100 members of the public provided staff with comments during the MTP planning
process. A public survey was used to ask people what they saw as needs and trends in the
region. The survey was given to residents and non-residents alike. 44% of survey respondents
live in Jefferson City and 20% live in Holts Summit. 85% stated that they work in Jefferson City.
This is consistent with the large amount of commuters that work in Jefferson City and drive in from
the surrounding rural areas.
WHEN ASKED ABOUT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS IN THE REGION…
WHEN ASKED ABOUT TRENDS AFFECTING THE FUTURE OF
THE REGION…
WHEN ASKED WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO THE OVERALL
VISION OF THE REGION…
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
29
UPDATING THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The MTP is federally mandated to be updated every five years to reflect the changing needs
and capacity of the region. The next update of this plan will take place in 2023-2024. That
being said, if there are significant changes to growth patterns, demographics, technology or the
transportation network modifications or amendments may be made. As an example, the 2020
Decennial Census may facilitate changes to certain growth patterns or show a shift in regional
dynamics. New funding sources, changes in legislation, or shifts in revenue may also trigger
modifications to the plan. For these reasons, routine review of the plan is necessary.
AMENDMENTS & MODIFICATIONS
The MTP is updated every five years. Between updates the MTP may be changed through an
amendment or administrative modification. An amendment to the MTP is subject to a 7-day
public comment period after being reviewed by the Technical Committee and before being
approved by the Board of Directors. If staff conducts an administrative modification, notice will
be provided to the Board of Directors either prior to or immediately following the modification.
Appendix I contains a list of amendments and administrative modifications.
Definitions of an amendment or administrative modification, according to 23 CFR §450.104, are
as follows:
Administrative modification means a minor revision to a long-range statewide or
metropolitan transportation plan, Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), or
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) that includes minor changes to
project/project phase costs, minor changes to funding sources of previously included
projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation dates. An administrative
modification is a revision that does not require public review and comment, a
redemonstration of fiscal constraint, or a conformity determination (in nonattainment and
maintenance areas).
Amendment means a revision to a long-range statewide or metropolitan transportation
plan, TIP, or STIP that involves a major change to a project included in a metropolitan
transportation plan, TIP, or STIP, including the addition or deletion of a project or a
major change in project cost, project/project phase initiation dates, or a major change in
design concept or design scope (e.g., changing project termini or the number of through
traffic lanes or changing the number of stations in the case of fixed guideway transit
projects). Changes to projects that are included only for illustrative purposes do not
require an amendment. An amendment is a revision that requires public review and
comment and a redemonstration of fiscal constraint. If an amendment involves “non-
exempt” projects in nonattainment and maintenance areas, a conformity determination is
required.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
30
INCORPORATION OF OTHER PLANS AND STUDIES
The Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) takes into consideration several local and regional
planning efforts and studies. Many of these previous planning efforts have identified projects,
strategies, and activities that are aligned with the goals outlined in the MTP.
PLANS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
CAMPO Transportation Improvement Program (updated annually) Appendix A
Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan – 2016 Appendix B
CAMPO Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan – 2017 Appendix C
CAMPO Travel Demand Model – 2019 Appendix D
CAMPO Wayfinding Plan – 2016 Appendix G
Thoroughfare Plan (To be completed in late 2020, following completion of MTP) Appendix H
OTHER IMPORTANT PLANS AND STUDIES
The following list includes several other plans, studies, and assessments that have influenced the
development of the MTP and guide decision making within the MPO.
• Callaway County Hazard Mitigation Plan
• Callaway County Emergency Management Plan
• Central Missouri Multimodal Port Feasibility Study
• Cole County Master Plan
• Cole County Hazard Mitigation Plan
• Cole County Emergency Management Plan
• Cole County/Jefferson City, County-Wide Transportation Study (2003)
• Holts Summit Transportation Plan
• Holts Summit Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Plan
• Jefferson City Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
• Jefferson City Central East Side Neighborhood Plan
• Jefferson City CDBG Program Consolidated Plan
• Jefferson City Comprehensive Plan
• Jefferson City Greenways Master Plan
• Jefferson City Historic Preservation Plan
• Jefferson City Memorial Airport Master Plan
• Jefferson City Parking Study Update (2017)
• Jefferson City Sewerage Master Plan
• Jefferson City Southside Redevelopment Plan
• Jefferson City Transit Feasibility Study
• Jefferson City Transit System Wide Assessment (2017)
• Missouri River Freight Corridor Assessment & Development Plan
• Mid-Missouri Regional Planning Commission Regional Transportation Plan
• Mid-Missouri Regional Planning Commission Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan
• MoDOT Long-Range Transportation Plan
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
31
Strategies,
Policies,
Projects
Forecasting Data
Analysis
SCENARIO PLANNING
Scenario planning is a way to achieve a shared vision for
the future by analyzing various factors that can impact
the way in which a region develops. A framework is
developed to assist stakeholders in making decisions to
reach a shared vision. Transportation planning utilizes
scenarios by considering how changes in transportation,
land use, resources, demographics, or other factors may
affect connectivity, mobility, and resiliency throughout the
region.
For the 2045 MTP, four land use scenarios were created
and a preferred scenario was chosen as the most likely
scenario for future development. The preferred scenario
was then used as part of a Travel Demand Model (TDM).
The TDM takes the preferred land use scenario and
analyzes the impacts of development on the transportation system, highlighting points of
congestion, capacity, and increased demands on the road network. CAMPO staff contracted
with City Explained, Inc. and used their scenario planning software, CommunityViz, to develop
the land use scenarios.
Figure 3.1 provides a comparison of the four scenarios.
THE FOUR SCENARIOS
Trend
•This scenario reflects an anticipated
development based on current trends. The
Trend Scenario looked at current landuse,
20-30 years of population growth,
adopted plans and policies, zoning, and
stakeholder input.
Central City Development
•This scenario uses the Trend Scenario as a
base and then imagines more infill in
downtown Jefferson City. A filling in of
vacant or abandoned properties with
residential and commercial development
that is consistent with recent neighborhood
plans and changes in zoning.
Unincorporated Growth
•This scenario uses the Trend Scenario as a
base and then imagines more intensive
development of the unincorporated
portions of the CAMPO region just west of
Jefferson City and just outside of Holts
Summit.
Aggressive Growth
•This scenario assumes much more
aggressive growth rates, more than double
those of the other scenarios and stands as
a “stress test” on metro-area systems over
the coming decades.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
32
Figure 3.1 Scenario Comparisons
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
33
THE PREFERRED SCENARIO
After evaluating the four scenarios and gathering public and stakeholder input the Trend
Scenario, highlighted in Figure 3.2, was chosen as the preferred scenario. This scenario
represented a middle ground between the Central City Scenario and the Unincorporated
Growth Scenario. These scenarios both reflect current trends seen in the community with larger
amounts of new housing developments occurring in unincorporated areas, and neighborhood
plans and rezoning occurring in the central part of Jefferson City and Holts Summit. Both
scenarios are reflected in the Trend. The Aggressive Growth Scenario provided staff and
stakeholders with an opportunity to better identify weak points in the transportation network that
may be exacerbated during peak times, special events, or potentially larger than expected
growth were to occur.
Figure 3.2: Preferred Scenario Overview
Indicator Today 2045 Change
Population 77,727 92,105 18.50%
Jobs 55,596 62,563 12.50%
Jobs per person 0.72 0.68 -5.60%
Dwelling Units 36,761 43,561 18.50%
Commercial ft2 11 Million 12.3 Million 11.90%
Industrial ft2 9.2 Million 10.7 Million 17.20%
In the development of the scenarios, housing and residential growth were the focus of analysis.
Figure 3.3 illustrates the projected residential density for the 2045 planning horizon.
• 20% of new residential growth and 16% of commercial/ industrial growth will occur
north of the Missouri River in the Holts Summit area, while 80% of new residential growth
and 84% of commercial/ industrial growth will occur south of the river in Jefferson City
and Unincorporated Cole County.
• Currently, over 75% of existing housing in the region is detached, single family
residences and approximately 25% of housing occurs either as multi-family housing,
typically either townhomes or apartments. In the preferred scenario, this pattern
continues with 88% of new housing expected to be detached, single family housing.
• While all communities in the area will experience some growth in the preferred scenario,
some communities will grow more than others. Approximately 22% of new residential
growth will occur in Jefferson City, followed by Holts Summit with 10%. Most other
communities will experience between 3-5% of new growth with the remainder in the
unincorporated areas.
• While most of the region’s housing stock is within existing incorporated communities, 61%
of the residential growth in the preferred scenario occurs in areas that are currently in
unincorporated Cole or Callaway Counties.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
34
Figure 3.3: Preferred Scenario – 2045 Projected Future Residential Density
TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL (TDM) ANALYSIS
Using land use data and other demographic data the TDM provides an analysis of current and
projected transportation demands on the transportation system over a 25 year planning horizon.
The modeling process is a system-level effort. Although individual links of a highway network
can be analyzed, the results are intended for determination of system-wide impacts. The TDM
provides a list of recommended improvements that are then incorporated into the MTP’s
Illustrative Project List. CAMPO contracted with HDR, Inc. to develop the 2045 TDM and
subsequent TDM Report, located in Appendix D.
METHOD
The TDM’s forecasts includ current travel demand using a 2015 base year and models demand
out to the 2045 long term planning horizon.
The model uses current population and development information, based on census data and
parcel data to determine existing generalized land use, and forecasted future population and
land use development to 2045 as inputs. The following methods were used to determine
residential and commercial development out to year 2045.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
35
The functional classification of the road network had been developed earlier, so traffic
counts on roadway links, and turning movements at selected intersections were conducted
for calibration purposes.
2010 census population data formed the baseline population.
2010 to 2020 growth rates were identified for CAMPO area, and then future growth
rates for Callaway and Cole County portions of CAMPO area were calculated.
Municipal populations within CAMPO area were calculated, along with the urban and
rural portions of CAMPO.
Parcel data for Cole and Callaway Counties, from County Assessor files were used to help
determine an initial land use classification and specific facility size and class of properties.
Properties were defined using both general land use classification codes and ITE (Institute
of Transportation Engineers) land use classifications codes.
Maps developed through the City of Jefferson GIS were used to evaluate development
potential for currently undeveloped areas within CAMPO. Development constraints, such as
flood plains, steep slopes, and provision of sewers and utilities were used to identify
physical limitations to future development.
Significant identifiable commercial and residential developments, (within 5-10 years) were
included in the future land use map. Other less identifiable development (15-25 years
out) was added to the future land use map later, but with less detail.
New roads were added to the network first, as projects that clearly were going on the
network such as interchanges, arterials, and corridors for arterial roads.
PROJECTED TRAVEL DEMAND FOR PEOPLE AND FREIGHT
The number of vehicle miles of travel (or VMT) is an indicator of the roadway system travel
levels by motor vehicles and is an estimate, based upon traffic volume counts and roadway
lengths, for a specific point in time. Regional daily VMT in 2010 was 1.75 Million and the 2045
projected daily VMT is 2.56 Million, doubling over a 35 year period.
Figure 3.4: 2045 Congested Roadways (Figure 4-4 in TDM Report)
PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES TO
CAPACITY (V/C)
Generally, intersections are the congestion
points in the roadways. Intersections
generate conflicts with turning movements,
differences in vehicle speeds, and cross
traffic requirements for stoplights.
Intersections that have reached their
maximum ability to move traffic through that
point are said to have reached 100% of
their capacity and the result is traffic backup,
delays, and possible “gridlock” during peak
hours in the morning and evening. Figures
3.4-6 depict congested and over capacity
roadways and intersections throughout the
CAMPO Region. Source: CAMPO 2045 TDM Report April 2019
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
36
Figure 3.5: 2045 PM Peak our Intersection Analysis (Table 4-6 in TDM Report)
Source: CAMPO 2045 TDM Report April 2019
Figure 3.6: 2045 PM Peak our Intersection Analysis (Table 4-6 in TDM Report)
Source: CAMPO 2045 TDM Report April 2019
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
37
4 Regional Overview
The CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) includes portions of
Callaway and Cole Counties as well as five incorporated communities;
Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, and Wardsville. The
Region is connected by three US highways that all intersect in Jefferson
City just south of the Missouri River bridge.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
38
POPULATION TRENDS
Figure 4.1 Population Density (Persons Per Square Mile)
Source: 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Figure 4.2 Population by Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction 2016 ACS 5-YR
Estimated Population
2010
Decennial
Census
Percent of CAMPO
Planning Area
Holts Summit 4,182 3,597 5.0%
Jefferson City 42,895 43,079 59.8%
St. Martins 1,177 1,140 1.6%
Taos 1144 878 1.2%
Wardsville 1,550 1,506 2.1%
Unincorporated Cole County * 18,507 25.7%
Unincorporated Callaway County * 3,290 4.6%
Totals *77,727 71,997 100%
* Population totals for unincorporated areas of the CAMPO planning area are not available in the 5-YR ACS Data. ACS is only
available as the Block Group Level which is aligned with the CAMPO Boundary. The 2016 ACS total for the MPA is an esitmate
Source: US Census Bureau
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
39
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Environmental Justice, in terms of transportation planning, means identifying and addressing
disproportionately high and adverse effects of transportation projects, programs, and policies on
minority populations and low-income populations to achieve an equitable distribution of benefits
and burdens across the region.
Environmental Justice is important because it helps to ensure full and fair participation by
potentially affected communities in every phase of the transportation decision-making process.
When this is accomplished, the development, construction, operation and maintenance of
transportation projects should reflect an equitable distribution of benefits and burdens.
In 1994 an Executive Order, by President Clinton, was issued directing federal agencies, to the
greatest extent practicable, to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations
and low-income populations. In 1997, the Department of Transportation issued an Order to
address Environmental Justice in minority populations and low-income populations to summarize
and expand upon the previous 1994 Order. The Federal Highway Administration then issued its
own Order in 1998 in an effort to address the effects of their programs, policies, and activities.
Another Executive Order in 2000, expanded protection against national origin discrimination, by
ensuring programs are accessible by people with limited English proficiency.
Recipients of federal funding are to ensure that there are no disproportionate adverse impacts
in the above mentioned communities, or those considered transportation dependent due to age
or physical limitations, when allocating or spending federal funds.
The MTP identifies the locations of the following groups in order to better understand impacts of
transportation programs, policies, and activities.
• low-income
• elderly and youth
• disabled
• minority
• limited English proficiency
Federal guidance identifies significant areas as those which contain more of the vulnerable
population than the average for the region. The location of these populations has been
compared to the location of the constrained projects included in the Transportation Improvement
Program once they are determined.
Most state-system projects and local-system projects generally occur in these higher population
areas with greater concentrations of EJ populations. Recent transportation improvements in these
areas consist of improved capacity for vehicles and improved access for pedestrians, cyclists,
and transit users.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
40
LOW-INCOME
Low-income or poverty is determined by the federal poverty guidelines and are represented by
individuals living below 185% of the poverty line, which are generated annually based on
family size and composition. Low-income individuals and families may be more likely to seek
public transportation or other transportation alternatives to automobiles. Figure 4.1 depicts the
percent of low-income populations within the CAMPO planning area.
The inner core of Jefferson City has block groups with significantly higher percentages, 40% to
65% or greater, of persons living below the poverty line as compared to the outlying areas.
Western portions of the planning also have higher levels of poverty with 15% to 40%.
Figure 4.1 Population in Poverty
Source: 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
41
ELDERLY
Figure 4.2 shows the distribution of the elderly population, 65 years of age or older, within the
CAMPO planning area.
As the “Baby Boomer” generation (individuals born in the United States between mid-1946 and
mid-1964) continues to reach retirement age, municipalities across the country will be faced with
the transportation needs of an increasingly aging population. The western portion of the
planning area and much of the surrounding rural area has higher percentages of elderly
individuals.
The central core of Jefferson City is home to a high concentration of elderly individuals living in
senior housing, public housing, and assisted living facilities. This concentration is crossed by two
transit routes, is close to the Jefferson City greenway system, accessible by sidewalk, and lies
close to three major US Highways.
Figure 4.1 Population Over the Age of 65
Source: 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
42
MINORITY POPULATIONS
Figure 4.3 shows the distribution of minority populations within the CAMPO planning area. The
core, and historically oldest, sections of Jefferson City has the highest density of minorities. There
are some higher concentrations of minorities that can be found in parts of unincorporated Cole
County as well.
Figure 4.3 Population Over the Age of 65
Source: 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
43
POPULATIONS WITH DISABILITIES
Figure 4.4 Percent of Population With a Disability
Callaway County Cole County
Total civilian non-institutionalized population 14.2% 13.2%
Population under 5 years 1.1% 0.4%
With a hearing difficulty 1.1% 0.3%
With a vision difficulty 0.5% 0.1%
Population 5 to 17 years 7.9% 5.4%
With a hearing difficulty 0.8% 0.4%
With a vision difficulty 1.3% 0.5%
With a cognitive difficulty 6.4% 3.1%
With an ambulatory difficulty 2.3% 1.2%
With a self-care difficulty 2.0% 0.6%
Population 18 to 64 years 12.1% 12.1%
With a hearing difficulty 3.3% 2.8%
With a vision difficulty 1.2% 2.9%
With a cognitive difficulty 4.5% 5.4%
With an ambulatory difficulty 6.6% 6.2%
With a self-care difficulty 1.7% 1.5%
With an independent living difficulty 3.4% 3.8%
Population 65 years and over 40.2% 37.4%
With a hearing difficulty 19.5% 16.5%
With a vision difficulty 5.4% 6.7%
With a cognitive difficulty 7.6% 8.1%
With an ambulatory difficulty 23.1% 23.0%
With a self-care difficulty 5.9% 5.8%
With an independent living difficulty 14.2% 14.1%
Source: 2010 US Census
TITLE VI
It is the policy of CAMPO that no person is excluded from participation in, denied the benefit of,
or subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial
assistance on the basis of race, color, or national origin under Title VI and related
nondiscrimination statutes.
To certify compliance with environmental justice requirements, CAMPO incorporates the following
activities into the planning processes and works towards the following:
1. Enhancement of analytical capabilities to ensure that the Metropoliotan Transportation
Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) comply with Title VI.
2. Identify residential, employment, and transportation patterns of low-income and minority
populations so that their needs can be identified and addressed, and the benefits and
burdens of transportation investments will be fairly distributed.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
44
3. Evaluate, and where necessary, improve public involvement processes to eliminate
participation barriers and engage minority and low-income populations in transportation
decision-making.
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requires funding recipients to report certain general
information to determine compliance with Title VI. The collection and reporting of this information
constitutes a recipient’s Title VI Program. To ensure compliance with 49 CFR Section 21.9 (b), the
FTA requires that all recipients document their compliance with this chapter by submitting a Title
VI Program to the FTA’s regional civil rights officer once every three years. As subrecipients,
CAMPO submits a Titile VI Plan to their primary recipient, MoDOT.
Limited English Proficieny
CAMPO maintains a Limited English Proficiency Plan (LEP) as part of Title VI requirements. The
plan provides an analysis LEP populations in the region. According to 2016 5-Year American
Community Survey data there are as few as 37 LEP households in the region, only 1.1% of total
households.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
45
LAND USE
Several trends emerged from the land use study and travel demand modeling.
Residential unit numbers are decreasing in the downtown area as redevelopment occurs, but residential development is
occurring at high rates south and west of Jefferson City and north into Callaway County around Holts Summit. New
commercial development is occurring to the east along Missouri Boulevard with major street improvements and big box
retailers. New schools, Pioneer Trails Elementary and the soon to be complete Capital City High School, will prompt
more residential development.
EXISTING LANDUSE CONDITIONS…
Figure 4.5 Proportions of land use by category for 2018
Figure 4.6 Current Land Use
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
46
ZONING
All of the incorporated communities in the CAMPO region have zoning.
Existing zoning use and impacts on transportation…
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
EMPLOYMENT
Figure 4.
Major Employers
Employer Employees
State of Missouri 14,174
Jefferson City Public Schools 1,627
Capital Region Medical Center 1,527
Scholastic Inc. 1,500
Quaker Windows & Doors 1,051
Central Bancompany 1,020
SSM Health - St. Mary's Hospital 982
ABB, Inc. 865
City of Jefferson 830
Wal-Mart Supercenter (2) 665
Jefferson City Medical Group (JCMG) 629
Unilever Home & Personal Care 467
WIPRO Infocrossing 461
Hy-Vee Food Stores 455
Lincoln University 369
County of Cole 363
Gerbes Super Market (2) 294
Missouri Farm Bureau 283
McDonald's Restaurants 250
State Technical College of Missouri 229
Meyer Electric Co. 216
Command Web 200
Modern Litho/Brown Printing 193
Modine Manufacturing Co. 191
Sam's Club 182
Lowe's Home Improvements 178
Learfield Communications 171
DeLong's, Inc. 154
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
47
5 The Transportation
System
This section identifies existing major roadways, transit, multimodal and
intermodal facilities, pedestrian walkways, bicycle facilities, and intermodal
connectors, and identifies proposed facilities to the system.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
48
ROADS AND BRIDGES
The CAMPO planning area consists of an extensive network of roadways and bridges. This
network ranges from local streets serving neighborhood needs to highways and expressways
serving national and regional trip purposes.
This network is the primary system used to support the efficient movement of people and goods
within and through the region. The network includes at least 6,874 total miles of roads and 159
bridges.
ROAD NETWORK
Of the 6,874 total miles of roads in the CAMPO Region, 53% (3,625 miles) maintained by
municipalities (cities or counties).
The major routes into and through the region are US highways 54, 50, and 63, intersecting
directly south of the Missouri River bridge, near the center of Jefferson City. In 2016 the
Missouri River bridge crossing carried an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) of 53,542
vehicles.
Figure 5.1: 2016 MoDOT Traffic Volume and Commercial Vehicle Counts for the Jefferson City Urbanized Area
Source: Image cropped from the 2016 MoDOT Central District Traffic Volume and Commercial Vehicle Count Map. AADT = Annual
Average Daily Traffic. Some AADTs on this map are estimates. All data is processed and reported in accordance with the Federal
Highway Administration Traffic Monitoring Guide.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
49
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM (NHS)
The NHS consists of roadways important to the nation's economy, defense, and mobility. NHS
Routes in the CAMPO planning area consist of US 50, US 54, US 63.
The National Highway System (NHS) includes the following subsystems of roadways:
1. Interstate: The Eisenhower Interstate System of highways retains its separate identity
within the NHS. The CAMPO region does not include any Interstate roadways.
2. Other Principal Arterials: Highways in rural and urban areas that provide access
between an arterial and a major port, airport, public transportation facility, or other
intermodal transportation facility.
3. Strategic Highway Network (STRAHNET): A highway network important to the United
States' strategic defense policy, providing defense access, continuity and emergency
capabilities for defense purposes.
4. Major Strategic Highway Network Connectors: Highways that provide access between
major military installations and highways that are part of the Strategic Highway
Network.
5. Intermodal Connectors: These highways provide access between major intermodal
facilities and the other four subsystems making up the National Highway System.
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
Functional classification, governed by federal guidelines, is the process by which roads, streets
and highways are grouped into classes according to the character of service they are intended
to provide. It defines the role that any particular road or street should play in serving the flow
of trips through a highway network. Functional classification progresses from a lower
classification handling short, local trips to a higher classification as the trips become longer and
connect regional and inter-regional traffic generators.
Functional classifications are periodically reviewed by MoDOT and local representatives, but are
usually updated every ten years, coinciding with U.S. Census revisions of urban boundaries. The
CAMPO functional classification system was last reviewed and revised in early 2013.
Functional classification is used in transportation planning, roadway design and determining the
funding eligibility of transportation projects. Private roads are not included in the CAMPO
functional classification network nor are interstate highways, tribal lands roadways, or federal
lands roadways.
Functionally classed roadways in the CAMPO network include; US highways, state highways,
county roads, and some municipal roads/streets. These roadways are divided into urban and
rural, and are further classified as local, collector, or arterial as seen in Figure 5.2.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
50
Figure 5.2 Federal System for Functional Classifications
Source: FHWA Functional Classification Guidelines
Federal-Aid Highway Program
The Federal-Aid Highway Program supports State highway systems by providing financial
assistance for the construction, maintenance and operations of the Nation's 3.9 million-mile
highway network, including Interstates, primary highways and secondary local roads. The
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is charged with implementing the Federal-aid Highway
Program in cooperation with the States and local government. Local governments own and
operate about 75 percent, or roughly 2.9 million miles, of the Nation's highway network.
The Federal-Aid Highway Program applies to all “functionally classed” roads, with the exception
of those classified as Minor Collectors or Local. Figure 5.2 provides a breakdown of miles of
functionally classed roadways in the CAMPO region for each municipality. Figure 5.3, on the
following page, provides a map of the functional classification of the roadways In the CAMPO
region.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
51
Figure 5.2: CAMPO Roadway Mileage by Functional Classification and Jurisdiction
Ur
b
a
n
-
Ot
h
e
r
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
/
Ex
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
Ur
b
a
n
-
Ot
h
e
r
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
Ur
b
a
n
-
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
Ur
b
a
n
-
Co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
Ur
b
a
n
-
Lo
c
a
l
Ru
r
a
l
-
Ot
h
e
r
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
Ru
r
a
l
-
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
Ru
r
a
l
-
Ma
j
o
r
C
o
l
l
e
c to
r
Ru
r
a
l
-
Mi
n
o
r
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
Ru
r
a
l
-
Lo
c
a
l
To
t
a
l
La
n
e
Mi
l
e
s
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
Callaway
County 2.3 2.9 11.2 0.9 2.9 13.9 34.2 5.3%
Cole
County 3.6 5.9 70.1 4.6 3.3 82.4 169.8 26.5%
Holts
Summit 3.1 4.1 16.5 0.5 0.6 24.7 3.9%
*City of
Jefferson 4.3 37.4 23.6 190.6 255.9 39.9%
MoDOT 34.6 8.7 18.2 11.9 5.6 5.4 5.3 32.7 1 0.1 123.5 19.2%
**State of
Missouri 4 1.6 5.6 0.9%
St.
Martins 1.5 0.5 7.4 0.7 10 1.6%
Taos 9.6 9.6 1.5%
Wardsville 8.6 8.6 1.3%
Total Lane
Miles 34.6 13 66.1 48.8 305.3 5.4 6.3 37.8 7.7 116.9 641.8 --
Percent of
Total 5.4% 2.0% 10.3% 7.6% 47.6% 0.8% 1.0% 5.9% 1.2% 18.2% -- 100%
*Includes Parks & Rec. and Interim
** MDC, MDNR, MDOC, etc.
Source: MoDOT 2017 Data
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
52
Figure 5.3 Functional Classifications of CAMPO Roadways
Source: MoDOT 2017 Data
CONDITION
According to 2017 MoDOT pavement condition data, 47.7% of the functionally classed
roadways in the CAMPO region are in “good” condition and 52.3% are in “not good” condition.
Good condition suggests no major investment is needed and poor condition suggests major
reconstruction investment is needed. Figure 5.4 provides an overview of system condition.
Figure 5.4 Condition of Functionally Classed of CAMPO Roadways
Source: MoDOT 2017 Data – Tracker Condition
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
FREEWAY LOCAL MAJOR
COLLECTOR
MINOR
ARTERIAL
MINOR
COLLECTOR
PRINCIPAL
ARTERIAL
Condition of Functionally Classed Roadways
Not Good
Good
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
53
Jefferson
City
35
Callaway
County
2
Cole
County
22
Taos
2
61
Off-System
Bridges
Jefferson
City
69
Callaway
County
6
Cole
County
20
St.
Martins
1
Holts
Summit
2
98
State-System
Bridges
BRIDGES
Based on a data provided by MoDOT’s Transportation Management System (TMS), there are
161 bridges in the CAMPO planning area. 100 of these bridges are “state-system” bridges
that are inspected, maintained, and rehabilitated by MoDOT. The other 61 bridges are “off-
system” structures that are the responsibility of local jurisdictions, although MoDOT may provide
some support in inspection.
Figure 5.5 Distribution of Off-System and State-System Bridges
Source: MoDOT 2017 Data
The Missouri River Bridge
The Missouri River crossing in Jefferson City carries US 54 and US 63 and consists of two
separate bridges, northbound and southbound. The southbound bridge, opened in 1955, has a
total length of 3,093 feet and a deck width of 38 feet. The northbound bridge, opened in
1991, has a total length of 3,124.2 feet and a deck width of 47 feet.
An eight foot wide pedestrian bridge, opened in April 2011, is located on the East side of the
northbound bridge. Only open to bicycle and foot traffic, the bridge provides connectivity
between Jefferson City on the South side and the Katy Trail and parks on the North side of the
river. The pedestrian bridge includes two look out points.
Source: CAMPO Staff
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
54
The Missouri River Bridge in Jefferson City has been identified as part of the regional critical
transportation infrastructure with 53,000 vehicles crossing the bridges on an average day. The
nearest alternative Missouri River bridge crossing is at Hermann (40 miles to the east) or at
Rocheport (32 miles to the northwest) on Interstate 70.
Both Jefferson City bridges had some rehabilitation in 2016 and are expected to have more
rehabilitation in 2021. The bridge is inspected regularly.
Rocheport Bridge Impacts
While not in the CAMPO region, the I-70 Rocheport Bridge is very important to the flow of
traffic through Mid-Missouri and the nation. MoDOT announced in 2018 that the Rocheport
Bridge, which is 60 years old, will last only ten more years even with rehabilitation. If closed, for
rehabilitation or replacement, the impacts on the CAMPO region would be significant.
Source: MoDOT
I-70 and the Rocheport Bridge are at the heart of national and regional distribution carrying
approximately 100 million tons of freight, worth more than $154 billion, annually. More than 20
percent of this freight is through-traffic, traveling from rural areas in the west on to New York,
New England, and the Mid-Atlantic. Rehabilitation of Rocheport Bridge will require closing two
lanes for seven to nine months, with predicted traffic modeling of three to eight hour
backups. The Rocheport Bridge carries 12.5 million vehicles per year, including 3.6 million
trucks. While the surrounding area is rural, there are a number of mid-sized cities within close
proximity to the bridge – including Columbia and Jefferson City – and it connects Missouri’s two
largest cities of St. Louis and Kansas City. During traffic delays, long distance trucking would
likely divert to Arkansas or Iowa to move across the U.S., while local traffic is expected to re-
route on US Routes 40, 36, 63 and 50.
The Jefferson City Missouri River crossing, which carries US 63 and US 50, is the closest major
river crossing in the Mid-Missouri area and would be heavily impacted. The Booneville crossing,
which is quite close to Rocheport, would not have the capacity to handle large amounts of detour
traffic and most travelers and freight would detour through Jefferson City.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
55
BRIDGE CONDITION
MoDOT inspects state-system bridges and culverts on a two-year inspection cycle. Bridges and
culverts that are rated “serious” to “poor,” or other bridges with unique structural features such
as major truss structures, are inspected more frequently on an annual basis. Bridges and culverts
that are referred to as “Off-System Bridges” may be inspected by a variety of personnel.
These personnel include MoDOT staff, city and county staff, and some by consultant.
According to the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS), condition ratings are used to
describe an existing bridge or culvert compared with its condition if it were new. The ratings are
based on the materials, physical condition of the deck (riding surface), the superstructure
(supports immediately beneath the driving surface) and the substructures (foundation and
supporting posts and piers). General condition ratings range from 0 to 9.
Through periodic safety inspections, data is collected on the condition of the primary components
of a structure. Condition ratings are collected for the following components of a bridge. A
condition rating of 4 or less on one of the following item classifies a bridge as structurally
deficient.
• The bridge deck, including the wearing surface
• The superstructure, including all primary load-carrying members and connections
• The substructure, considering the abutments and all piers
The deck, superstructure and substructure are each rated separately. If any of the three
structures rate a 2 or lower, the bridge is typically closed. The overall condition of the bridge is
the lowest rating of the three structures. Figure 5.6 depicts the rating system used to inspect
bridges. Figure 5.7 depicts the location of bridges their condition ratings.
Figure 5.6: Bridge Condition Ratings
9 – Excellent excellent condition
Not Deficient
8 – Very Good no problems noted
7 – Good some minor problems
6 – Satisfactory structural elements show some minor deterioration
5 – Fair all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss,
cracking, spalling or scour
4 – Poor advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour
Structurally
Deficient
3 – Serious
loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected
primary structural members. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in
steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 – Critical
advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in
steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have
removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be
necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken.
1 – Imminent Failure
major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural members or
obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Bridge is closed to traffic until corrective action is completed.
0 – Failed out of service – beyond corrective action
Source: MODOT
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
56
Figure 5.7: CAMPO Off-System and State-System Bridges and Condition Ratings
Source: MODOT 2017 Data
Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete Bridges
In addition to a condition rating bridges are given a classification of Structurally Deficient or
Functionally Obsolete. These classifications denote a bridge’s ability to stay in service and help
determine which bridges may need repair or replacement.
Structurally Deficient refers to bridges needing significant maintenance, rehabilitation, or
replacement
Functionally Obsolete refers to bridges that no longer meet current design criteria, either
because traffic volumes exceed what was anticipated or design
standards have changed.
Currently, the only functionally obsolete bridge in the region is a small closed overpass with the
“Tri-Level”. The Tri-Level is the name used for the junction of US 54, US 63, and US 50.
Figure 5.8 provides a list of structurally deficient bridges
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
57
Figure 5.8: Structurally Deficient Bridges
Structurally Deficient Bridges
Bridge
Design
No. Feature Carried Feature Crossed County
Responsible
Party
Year
Built Rebuilt
AADT
2017
Minimum
Rating
A0576 MO 179 S GRAYS CR Cole MoDOT 1959 1988 5369 6
T1012 PVT BRIDGE
T1012 S UNNAMED CR Callaway MoDOT 1982 10 5
N0683 RT W S ROCK CR Cole MoDOT 1958 2007 1527 6
A1307 US 54 W LINDEN DR Cole MoDOT 1966 28897 6
A1672 US 54 W STADIUM BLVD Cole MoDOT 1966 28377 6
A4794 RAMP BU50
TO US54E W DUNKLIN ST Cole MoDOT 1989 2292 7
A4005 US 50 W MO 179 Cole MoDOT 1983 35032 6
A1305 US 54 E BU 50 Cole MoDOT 1966 28897 6
A1672 US 54 E STADIUM BLVD Cole MoDOT 1966 28377 6
A1415 US 54 W MOREAU RVR
OVERFLO Cole MoDOT 1967 1986 19173 6
A0722 US 50 W VETTER LN Cole MoDOT 1960 2005 36707 6
A4497 US 54 E MISSOURI RVR,
MOKAN ST Cole MoDOT 1991 56771 6
A1309
RAMP
MADISON ST
TO US54W
US 54 Cole MoDOT 1966 4055 6
G0302 US 54 W NEIGHORN BR Cole MoDOT 1965 19173 6
A4793 RAMP US54E
TO BU50 E
W DUNKLIN ST,
WEARS Cole MoDOT 1989 2281 7
A3538 US 63 S OILWELL RD,
KATY TRA Callaway MoDOT 1975 21898 7
K0760 US 54 E NEIGHORN BR Cole MoDOT 1941 19173 5
L0550 US 54 W MISSOURI RVR,
UP RR Cole MoDOT 1955 56771 5
A1305 US 54 W BU 50 Cole MoDOT 1966 1989 28897 6
A1307 US 54 E LINDEN DR Cole MoDOT 1966 28897 6
A0722 US 50 E VETTER LN Cole MoDOT 1960 2005 36707 6
A7631 JEFFERSON ST
E US 54 Cole MoDOT 2007 6554 8
A1187 DIX RD S US 50 Cole MoDOT 1964 16356 5
Source: MODOT 2017 Data
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
58
PEDESTRIAN & NON-MOTORIZED
Walking and bicycling are important aspects of a community’s public health, economic vitality,
safety, environmental sustainability, and mobility. These modes of transportation are especially
important for children, the elderly, the disabled, and those with fixed or low incomes.
Walkability and bikeability are important to attracting tourists and attracting or retaining
residents alike.
The CAMPO planning area encompasses
both urban and rural areas. The
communities of Holts Summit and Jefferson
City are generally walkable with
sidewalks, trails, and connectivity to Katy
Trail State Park. Smaller communities have
limited connectivity and have little to no
public sidewalks. The need for greater
connectivity, access, and safety are
important. Improving connectivity and
access will provide more direct, convenient,
and safe travel routes for walking and
bicycling while also providing more travel
choices, reduce dependency on
automobiles, and improve general quality
of the life.
Source: July 2016 Salute to America “Red, Bike, and Blue” bicycle event
CAPITAL AREA PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE PLAN
Adopted in 2017, the Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan is intended as a resource to
improve safety, connectivity, and mobility for pedestrian and bicycle users in the CAMPO
planning area. The goals, recommendations, and strategies outlined in the plan can be used by
jurisdictions to develop an individualized implementation strategy to fit the unique pedestrian
and bicycle needs of that community. The plan, located in Appendix B, has been incorporated
into the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond MTP.
RECENT TRENDS
Bicycle and Scooter Rental
Recent trends in non-motorized travel in the CAMPO region includes the 2018 introduction of
motorized dockless scooters and bicycles to Jefferson City. The bicycle and scooter program is
owned and operated by SPIN, a private company running similar operations across the nation.
There were 2,037 bicycles in calendar year 2018. Scooters were introduced in late 2018 and
statistics for ridership is not available yet.
New Bike Lanes
Both Jefferson City and Holts Summit have added marked bike routes and lanes to their
communities in 2018. In Holts Summit, sharrows have been painted on S. Summit Drive,
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
59
connecting bicycle riders to the Holts Summit Katy Trail Spur. In Jefferson City, Capital Avenue,
High St., and Dunklin St. street have had bike lanes and signage added. The 2019 addition of
shared bike lanes on Miller St. will provide connectivity between the Dunklin Street Greenway
Trailhead and the McCarty St. Greenway Trailhead.
SIDEWALKS, GREENWAYS, AND TRAILS
Sidewalk accessibility and connectivity is limited by gaps, obstructions, and poor conditions in
some areas. That being said, there are several areas in the CAMPO region where recent
improvements have increased accessibility and condition dramatically. Figure 5.9, taken from
the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan depicts locations of sidewalks and trails in the
CAMPO region.
Replacement and improvement to sidewalks and crosswalks along Missouri Boulevard in 2016
provided much needed connectivity between Missouri Boulevard’s commercial strip and
downtown Jefferson City. The 2014 construction along US Business 50 east of St. Martins
included installation of 3.5 miles sidewalks and signalized crosswalks. The project was part of a
Safe Routes to School project that provided connectivity between Pioneer Trails Elementary
School, nearby residential areas, and Binder Lake Park. Recent construction of sidewalks and
crosswalks in Holts Summit also improved connectivity and accessibility between nearby schools,
parks, and residences.
Figure 5.9 Sidewalks and Trails in the CAMPO Region
Source: 2016 Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
60
All sidewalks have been assessed and inventoried in the CAMPO region, reflecting the
improvements listed above. CAMPO staff maintains a sidewalk database that is regularly
updated and incorporates data that has been collected in cooperation with several regional
partners. Data collected from the 2010 Jefferson City Sidewalk Plan, Callaway County
Sidewalk Inventory, and Cole County Sidewalk Inventory have been incorporated into this
database. Additionally, more than 350 marked or designated crosswalks are also found in the
database.
Shared path greenways and unpaved trails are an important recreational and travel facility for
urban areas. They are very popular with residents nationwide and a commodity that is
marketed by realtors.
Because of the high costs to build greenways and trails, which has ranged from $90 per foot to
$465 per foot, oftentimes municipalities apply for grants from MoDOT or Missouri Department
of Natural Resources Division of State Parks.
Figure 5.10 provides a list of miles of sidewalk and trails by jurisdiction. Figure 5.11 provides a
list of federally funded sidewalk and trail projects that have been completed since 2013.
Figure 5.10 Sidewalks and Trails Mileage by Jurisdiction
Sidewalks Miles
Cole County 4
Holts Summit 5.6
Jefferson City 118.5
Taos 0.5
Wardsville 0.18
Trails Miles
Greenway Trails and Spurs 14.9
Park/Fitness Trails 3.45
Mountain Bike Trails 15.35
State Owned Trails 3.3
Source: CAMPO
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
61
Figure 5.11 Projects Completed Using Federal Funds since 2013
Year Jurisdiction Project Type Project Name
Federal
Funding
Category Total Cost
2013 Jefferson
City
Sidewalk Missouri Blvd. Sidewalk Project
Phase 2
TE $463,723
2013 Jefferson
City
Greenway McKay Park Area Greenway
Connection
RTP $260,117
2014 Jefferson
City
Bike Plaza Clay Street Bike
Plaza
TE/CDBG $163,000
2014 Jefferson
City
Amtrak
Station
AMTRAK Depot
Plaza Restoration @ Historic
Water St.
TE $591,825
2014 Holts
Summit
Sidewalk Intersection &
Sidewalk Improvements
TE $363,865
2014 Holts
Summit
Greenway Trail Connector RTP $123,825
2015 Cole
County
Sidewalk Pioneer Trail School Safe Routes
to Schools
Project
SRTS $707,000
2015 Holts
Summit
Greenway Trail Connection Project Phase 2 RTP $125,940
2015 St. Martins Greenway Niekamp Park Trailhead Phase 1 RTP $126,502
2015 Holts
Summit
Sidewalk North Summit Drive Sidewalk
Connection Project
TAP $398,100
2015 St. Martins Study Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety
Analysis of Business 50 in St.
Martins
TEAP $10,024
2016 Jefferson
City
Wayfinding Wayfinding Signage TAP $267,500
2016 Jefferson
City
Greenway Frog Hollow Greenway Trail
Extension Phase 2
RTP $502,260
2018 Jefferson
City
Greenway Community Park Greenway
Trailhead
RTP $309,000
2019 Jefferson
City
Sidewalk Missouri Boulevard Sidewalk –
Beck to Waverly
TAP $348,205
2019 St. Martins Sidewalk/
Pavement
Improvements
Business 50 W Bike/Ped/ADA
Improvements
TAP $873,530
2019 Osage
Region Trail
Association
Trail Binder Bike Park Phase 1 RTP $49,282
Total 5,683,698
Source CAMPO Transportation Improvement Program Documents – 2013-2019
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
62
TRANSIT
There are several transportation providers that operate in the Mid-Missouri are and statewide.
The CAMPO region is served by many of these agencies, including fixed-route providers like
JEFFTRAN in Jefferson City and rural providers like Oats, Inc., which serves users throughout
northern and central Missouri or Serve, Inc. in Callaway County.
COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan is updated every three years
per federal regulation. The plan provides an overview of current conditions, capacities, and
goals as they relate to transit in the CAMPO region. The CAMPO Coordinated Public Transit-
Human Services Transportation Plan is located in Appendix C.
FIXED ROUTE SERVICE
JEFFTRAN is the public transportation provider for the City of Jefferson. Operated as a division
in the Department of Public Works of the City of Jefferson, JEFFTRAN provides fixed route and
paratransit services within the city limits of Jefferson City.
JEFFTRAN operates six fixed routes and three commuter/school tripper routes during the school
year.
Regular fixed route service operates Monday through Friday from 6:45 AM to 5:45 PM (except
holidays) using a “pulse” system, where all routes except the Capital Mall route converge on the
transfer point at 40 minute intervals.
All buses on regular scheduled routes have bicycle racks to accommodate two bicycles and is
part of the JEFFTRAN Bike 'n' Ride program.
When travel requires changing to a different route to complete a journey, a transfer point
becomes necessary. The transfer center is on 820 East Miller Street.
CAMPO staff continues to assist JEFFTRAN in consultation, programming, scheduling and maps as
needed. CAMPO assists JEFFTRAN with their Program of Projects processes. No expansion is
proposed, but increased efficiency in routes has been introduced by changing routes and
schedules.
JEFFTRAN PARATRANSIT SERVICES
“Handi-Wheels” complementary paratransit services are provided by JEFFTRAN, providing curb
to curb service for individuals with disabilities and those unable to use fixed route transportation
systems (an "origin to destination" service). Although the Handi-Wheels service operates entirely
within the city limits, it provides services beyond the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 through a larger than required service area. Within this service area,
eligible residents may receive services from 6:45 AM to 5:45 PM Monday through Friday.
Handi-Wheels service utilizes eight vehicles that report 1,930 ADA qualified passengers with
daily transport of as many as 300 riders. All buses are wheelchair-lift equipped and provide
transportation for those individuals who because of disability cannot travel to or from a "fixed
route" bus stop or cannot get on, ride or get off a "fixed route" bus.
Funding is provided through a mix of sources such as passenger fares, local funding, FTA funding
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
63
and contracts. Handi-Wheels can pick up clients anywhere inside the city limits and take them to
any destination within the city limits.
Handi-Wheels riders must apply for and be approved in order to use this service. Applications
and detailed service descriptions are available in standard print and accessible formats.
RURAL TRANSIT SERVICE
OATS Inc. is a not-for-profit transportation service available to the general public in the rural
areas of Callaway and Cole Counties with priority service to senior citizens and persons with
disabilities. Anyone living in rural areas whose needs can be met by OATS’ service schedules is
eligible to ride their local OATS buses. OATS, Inc. ridership numbers remain strong after 40
years of service and the service continues to grow in popularity.
Serve Inc. serves the residents of Callaway County through CALTRAN a public transportation
program based in Fulton.
MISSOURI RIDESHARE AND CARPOOL PROGRAM
The Missouri Rideshare and Carpool Program is a free service provided by the Missouri
Department of Natural Resources. The program organizes carpools by matching commuters who
live and work in the same vicinity and serve many counties in Mid-Missouri.
MoDOT supports carpooling through the “Carpool Connections” website at:
www.modot.org/carpool-connections
Carpool/Commuter lot locations:
• By the municipal airport
• Across US 54 at the Jefferson City Park
• US 50/63 East at Route M and J
OTHER SERVICES
• Charter Service and Shuttles - D&K Bus Service, First Student Inc., Tyus Executive
Transportation Service.
• Greyhound Bus – Connection located in Jefferson City of Jefferson
• Rideshare - UBER
• Taxi/ limousine - Checker Cab of Jefferson City LLC., Capitol City Limousine, and Sedan
Inc. and Chase Limousines.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
64
AIR TRAVEL
The CAMPO Region includes one airport, the Jefferson City Memorial Airport, and a handful of
helicopter landing platforms. While there are no commercial airlines operating within the
Region, Columbia Regional Airport is located 20 miles away and does provide this service.
Private aircraft, the Missouri National Guard, medical transport, or other government agencies
represent the majority of aircraft use in the Region. An updated Airport Master Plan will be
completed in 2019. CAMPO has incorporated elements of the plan into the goals, strategies,
and projects listed in the MTP.
JEFFERSON CITY MEMORIAL AIRPORT
Jefferson City Memorial Airport is a general aviation facility with no commercial airline
passenger services. Constructed in 1948, the facility is located north of the Capitol in the
Missouri River floodplain and is occasionally affected by flooding. The airport facility consists of
a 4,800 square foot Airport Terminal Building, Air Traffic Control Tower, one 6,000 foot long
runway with instrument approach procedures, and one crosswind runway 3,400 feet long. Both
runways are equipped with parallel taxiways. The control tower operates from 6:00 a.m. until
9:30 p.m. 365 days a year and 24-hour radar approach services are provided by Mizzou
Approach in Springfield, Missouri. On-site services include a restaurant, fuel services and flight
products and a full service fixed base operator.
Approximately 64 aircraft are based at the airport either permanently or intermittently; 70%
are single-engine or multi-engine planes. Approximately 10 jet engine planes and small number
of helicopters and military aircraft are also based at the airport. These numbers fluctuate and
are based on 2017 staff reports. Figure 4-1 shows the fluctuations in airport traffic since 1974.
Source: Jefferson city Airport historic traffic data – Jefferson City
OTHER AVIATION FACILITIES
The Missouri National Guard has a small aviation facility near the Jefferson City Memorial
Airport and two heliports are located at the Missouri National Guard Ike Skelton Training Site in
eastern Jefferson City. Both the Capital Region Medical Center and St. Mary’s Hospital have
helipads for medical transport.
MODOT AND AIRPORT PLANNING
Missouri is one of ten states in the State Block Grant Program, which means that MoDOT acts on
behalf of the FAA in certain circumstances. MoDOT is the approving authority for all airport
master planning and airport layout plans for Missouri's general aviation airports.
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2017To
t
a
l
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
Airport Traffic Counts 1974-2017
Jefferson City Memorial Airport
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
65
WATERWAYS & PORTS
The Missouri River runs through the heart of the CAMPO region and is the only navigable
waterway in the region capable of carrying commercial goods and products. The river has
always played an important role in commerce and transportation by connecting the Mississippi
River and points east to the West. While the current commercial use of the river has seen a
strong decline over the past 30 years, some industries still use this thoroughfare for products such
as sand, rock, grain and other large items that may be difficult to transport via highway or air.
According to MoDOT’s Long-Range Transportation Plan, approximately 30 million tons of freight
claims a Missouri port as the point of origin.
The Missouri River provides commercial waterway traffic during an average of 8 months per
year, during navigable water levels. According to the 2018 update to MoDOT’s Long Range
Transportation Plan, river transport allows for an average of $12.5 billion in cargo annually.
Freight transported this way sees an annual growth of 1.3 percent annually and is expected to
increase to $15.4 billion by 2030 which amounts to a cumulative increase of 23.1 percent or 1.1
percent annually. Missouri has 1,050 miles of navigable rivers, including 500 miles of the
Mississippi River and 550 miles of the Missouri River.
PRIVATE PORTS
Mid-Missouri’s only private port is located in the CAMPO region. Owned by the Capital Sand
Company. The private port and dock facility is mostly used for the movement of rock and sand.
HEARTLAND PORT AUTHORITY
In the summer of 2017, the Jefferson City Area Chamber of Commerce, the counties of Cole and
Callaway, and the City of Jefferson all contributed to a port feasibility study. Noting a dearth
of port facilities along the Missouri River between Kansas City and St. Louis, the Chamber
contracted with Cambridge Systematics to conduct a two phase port feasibility study, which was
released in 2018. There are two potential sites for a port location: one is north of the Missouri
River in Callaway County and the other being on the south side of the Missouri River near the
Missouri National Guard facility off of Militia Drive in Jefferson City.
In September 2018, the Heartland Port Authority was approved by the Missouri Highways and
Transportation Commission. The Heartland Port Authority of Central Missouri Commission consists
of nine-member board - three County of Callaway officials, three County of Cole officials and
three City of Jefferson officials.
The Port Authority is currently looking for funding to build the port facility. They applied for a
Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Transportation Grant program,
which supports road, rail, transit, and port infrastructure projects across the country. The BUILD
grant is a federal grant through the federal Department of Transportation. The Port Authority
was not awarded the grant in 2018, but may look for future BUILD or related grants.
RECREATIONAL ACCESS
Area residents and visitors do not have good access to the Missouri River from the south side of
the river due to rail lines and steep terrain. It is generally considered to be an underutilized
resource for recreation and to a lesser degree transportation.
Public access to the Missouri River, Cedar Creek, and Osage River are provided by the Missouri
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
66
Department of Conservation at the following locations:
• Capital View Access in Callaway County
• Carl R. Noren Access in Callaway County
• Mari-Osa Access in Cole County
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
67
FREIGHT & INTERMODAL FACILITIES
Freight movement within and through the CAMP region consists primarily of truck transport, river
transport of bulk commodities, and rail transport. Freight movement statistics are difficult to
ascertain without a more in depth study. The most relevant freight movement data available is
at the Central District level as part of the MoDOT Freight Plan. Figure 5.x from the Central
District portion of the MoDOT Freight Plan.
Figure 5.x Missouri Passenger Rail Service
Source: MoDOT Freight Plan
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
68
The above figure shows the eighteen counties that
make up the district. The plan identifies several
major employers in the district, including ABB
Power, Brewer Science, State Farm Insurance and
Tracker Marine. Comments collected through
public engagement include improving connectivity
throughout the district and specifically noted that
improving north-south connections, including US
63 between Jefferson City and Rolla. They also
stated that the Missouri River is underutilized and
under-marketed.
For freight in general, previous stakeholder input identified several high priority deficiencies in
the regional freight environment, such as truck routing, signage, street and intersection design,
lack of supporting freight accommodations such as terminals, depots, stopping areas, and refuel
options, are items that need to be improved, according to freight representatives during public
participation and planning sessions.
INTERMODAL SYSTEMS
According to the Federal Highway Administration, the term "intermodal" refers to a transfer of a
shipment from one transportation mode to another as the shipment moves from origin to
destination. Intermodal facilities may move people or freight between modes such as seaports,
airports, truck/rail terminals, pipeline/truck terminals and other inter-modal freight
transportation facilities.
The CAMPO region has three inter-modal facilities located in Jefferson City: (1) the AMTRAK
station with rail and roadway connections, (2) the Jefferson City Memorial Airport, with limited
general aviation passenger services, small freight transfers, and car rental services, and (3) a
private river terminal using truck and river transport for bulk commodities.
Once constructed, the Heartland River Port would serve as a fourth intermodal facility; with
construction anticipated to be completed in the next five to ten years.
CAMPO supports creation of a regional intermodal facility that would connect truck, rail, and
river freight storage and transfer facilities. Creation of a true intermodal passenger facility is
also desired by stakeholders in the region. Connectivity is desired between Amtrak, Columbia
Regional Airport, Jefferson City Airport, city transit, and Greyhound Bus Services.
Missouri freight is expected
to increase dramatically
from 600+ million tons in
2011 to an estimated 1
billion tons in 2040. In 2012,
Missouri exported $13.9
billion in freight.
-MoDOT Freight Plan
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
69
RAIL
The CAMPO region is home to a Class I rail line carrying both freight and passenger rail
services. This rail line is owned and operated by Union Pacific. Rail is a major part of the
freight transportation system in Missouri and plays a significant role in the state’s economy. A
substantial portion of the freight moving into, out of, and through Missouri is carried on trains. In
2011, 8.2 million rail cars carried 458.1 million tons of freight valued at $465 billion
representing 38.6% of the total value of goods shipped in the state.
FREIGHT RAIL
The 2018 update of the MoDOT Long Range Transportation Plan states that 40% of the freight
moved in Missouri is by rail and that this percentage of freight transportation will increase in the
future. Total freight tonnage shipped in or through Missouri was 352 million tons in 2016.
Cargo shipped from Missouri to elsewhere include farm products, chemicals, vehicles and parts.
Rail traffic carrying freight is generally through traffic on the Union Pacific Railroad. The main
track is a double track line with a new second bridge crossing the Moreau River, completed in
2013, and a spur line running from the Missouri Boulevard and Water Street area to just west of
MO Rt. 179/Truman Boulevard. A second branch also runs from Cole Junction Road and MO Rt.
179, while a third spur runs eastward to Militia Drive.
According to the Missouri Freight and Passenger Rail Capacity Analysis of 2007 the corridor
running through Jefferson City is handling between 50-60 trains per day which is at the upper
limits of capacity for a double track line handling the types of freight that it does. From a train
weight perspective this corridor handles a large percentage (roughly 50%) of heavy coal trains.
Recent rail improvements include a new siding near California and a second bridge over the
Osage River.
PASSENGER RAIL
Amtrak operates the only passenger rail service in Mid-Missouri, with a station located in
Jefferson City. This Amtrak service line is only one of two national passenger train routes in
Missouri, providing connections to Chicago, Los Angeles and San Antonio, and a state supported
route, the Missouri River Runner, between St. Louis and Kansas City. The Missouri River Runner
includes stops in Kirkwood, Washington, Hermann, Jefferson City, Sedalia, Warrensburg, Lee’s
Summit and Independence.
The Missouri River Runner provides two trips each day and, according to Missouri’s LRTP, had an
87 percent on-time performance in 2017. Each year, about 500,000 passengers ride Amtrak
trains in Missouri, which includes 200,000 on the state supported route. In 2017, the Missouri
River Runner provided service to approximately 171,000 passengers according to the MoDOT
Long Range Transportation Plan. Passenger rail in Missouri is seen as a growing industry for
business travelers, students and commuters alike. Given the expected population growth in some
areas, passenger rail will continue to be an important option for travelers in Missouri. Figure 5.x
depicts passenger rail service in Missouri.
BLUEBERRY SCONES
Thank you for reading this document. As a reward for reading this, please enjoy this recipe for
blueberry scones, which would go great with a ride on a train! Directions - In a bowl, combine
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
70
the 4 cups flour, 6TBS sugar, 4.5 tsp baking powder and .5 tsp salt; cut in 2 TBS butter until
mixture resembles coarse crumbs. In a bowl, whisk 2 eggs and .75 cup milk; add to dry
ingredients just until moistened. Turn onto a lightly floured surface; gently knead in 1.5 cups
blueberries. Divide the dough in half. Pat each portion into an 8-in. circle; cut each into eight
wedges. Place on greased baking sheets, brush with milk, and bake at 375 for 15-20 minutes
or until tops are golden brown. Serve warm.
Figure 5.x Missouri Passenger Rail Service
Source: MoDOT
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
71
TRENDS IN TRANSPORTATION
AUTOMATED VEHICLES
There have been a number of safety advancements made by automobile companies in the last
five years, but none are as likely to change the driving experience as automated vehicles. What
once seemed to come straight out of the pages of science fiction, now the likelihood of full
automation (automobiles being able to perform all driving functions) seems to be a foregone
conclusion by 2045.
This has profound implications in several arenas, such as efficient freight movement and the
reduction of fatalities on roads and highways. In a society with a majority implementation of
fully automated vehicles, crashes are likely to dramatically reduced, bringing savings from fewer
crashes and the delays that result. Another benefit is the chance for more mobility options for
those that reside in the CAMPO region.
SMART CITIES
As the global population continues to grow, so too will the number of people living in urban
areas. By 2050, the United Nations has estimated that approximately six billion people will be
living in a city. To prepare for the strain of large populations, the smart city concept was
developed. This idea focuses on people, processes, and technology. That is to say, cities and its
officials must understand who resides in the city and adopted policies to adapt to their needs.
This is followed by technology to meet these needs to improve life in those cities. Some
examples of this are electronic communications in order to finding parking, reporting nuisances
such as tall weeds or overflowing trash, and alerting drivers of traffic crashes. Future examples
may be something that resembles how the Google Glass worked, providing information in real
time on a visual display.
HYPERLOOP
The hyperloop has only emerged for discussion in the last five to seven years. Because of
limitations to high speed rail such as wind resistance and friction with rails, the concept of a
capsule moving along a tube that is partial vacuum has been proposed. Designs vary, with some
using maglev tracks and some using air pressure to levitate the capsule. Speeds could
potentially reach over 700 miles per hour, which is equal to or surpasses air flight in terms of
speed. Questions remain on a number of factors including air pressure buildup, acceleration
effects on the human body (estimated to be a factor or two above airplane take off), and the
routes.
In March 2019, the Missouri legislature formed a panel on hyperloop in Missouri. The panel is
composed of elected officials from both bodies, economic development and educational
representatives, and other private interests. The proposed route that has been reported is
between St. Louis and Kansas City, with a stop in Columbia.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
72
6 The Financial Plan &
Implementation
This section demonstrates how the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) can be funded and
implemented, including:
• funding resources
• a fiscally constrained investment plan
• unfunded illustrative projects
• a plan for implementation and a list of strategies.
The graphic below gives a how projects and strategies outlined in the
MTP are implemented.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
73
THE FINANCIAL PLAN
The Financial Plan demonstrates how the adopted transportation plan can be implemented.
When combined with the current Transportation Improvement Program in Appendix A, this section
stands as the Financial Plan for the MTP. The following paragraphs address the federal
requirements as they pertain to the development of the Financial Plan.
This section contains system-level estimates of costs and revenue sources that are
reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain federal-aid
highways and public transportation within the CAMPO region over the 25-year planning
horizon.
CAMPO works with public transportation operators, member jurisdictions, and MoDOT to
cooperatively develop estimates of funds that will be available to support
implementation of the MTP. All necessary financial resources from public sources that
are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the MTP are identified in
this section. There are no private sector revenue sources identified as contributing to the
implementation of the MTP at this time.
This section also includes recommendations on additional funding sources and includes an
assessment of innovative financing resources.
CAMPO has taken into account all projects and strategies proposed for funding under
title 23 U.S.C., title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or with other Federal funds; State assistance;
local sources; and private participation. As applicable, an inflation rate that reflects
“year of expenditure dollars” has been applied to revenue and cost estimates. These
rates are based on information developed cooperatively by CAMPO, MoDOT, member
jurisdictions, and public transportation operators.
An illustrative list of non-fiscally constrained projects, for which additional funding would
need to be identified, is included in this section. These projects have been categorized,
prioritized, and include cost ranges.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
74
FISCAL CONSTRAINT 2020-2024
THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)
The TIP, located in Appendix A, stands as the “Fiscally Constrained” list of the first five years of
the Metropolitan Transportation Plan’s Financial Plan. Developed in accordance with federal
regulations CFR §450.324, the TIP is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be
implemented within the MPA, which are funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed regionally significant.
Each project or project phase included in the TIP is to be derived from the MTP and is part of the
process of applying for funds from the FHWA and FTA. Certain capital and non-capital
transportation projects using funding under 23 USC and 49 USC Chapter 53 or regionally
significant projects requiring action by the FHWA or the FTA are required to be included in the
TIP and derived from the MTP. The TIP is developed in cooperation with the MoDOT, local
jurisdictions, and public transportation operators. Figure 6.1lists the most current TIP projects. A
more detailed breakdown of these projects can be found in the current TIP document located in
Appendix A.
TIP PROJECT SELECTION
Projects are identified by agencies with jurisdiction over the project, using their own criteria and
are submitted to the CAMPO Board of Directors for approval before being included in the TIP.
Projects are approved based on their consistency with the goals and strategies outlined in the
MTP. A more detailed description of the TIP application process is located in Appendix A.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
75
Figure 6.1 2020-2024 TIP Projects
Project Sponsor TIP # MODOT# Total Cost
Bridge Deck sealing over Route 54 MoDOT 2018-01 5S3261 $948,000
Bridge Improvements on US 54 Over
Missouri River
MoDOT 2019-01 5P3337 $5,356,000
Bridge Preventative Maintenance On US
50 Over Osage River
MoDOT 2019-02 5P2190 $569,000
US 54 Pavement Improvements MoDOT 2017-05 5P3121 $7,073,000
Pavement Resurfacing on US 50 MoDOT 2019-03 5P3333 $3,497,000
Guard Cables Along US 54 MoDOT 2019-06 5P3371 $3,276,000
Business 50 W Bike/Ped/ADA
Improvements
St. Martins 2020-01 9901515 $873,530
Pavement Improvements on US 63 MoDOT 2020-03 5P3409 $17,064,000
High Friction Surface Treatment MoDOT 2020-04 5I3408 $1,378,000
Upgrading Signalization MoDOT 2020-13 5P3426 $1,691,000
Scoping Routes M, B, and W MoDOT 2013-16 5S2234 $53,000
Guard Cables and Guardrail Repair in
Northern Central District
MoDOT 2018-06 5P3405 $644,000
Slide Repair Scoping MoDOT 2015-07 5S3081 $67,000
Surveying MoDOT 2020-10 5P3314 $16,000
Surveying MoDOT 2018-08 5P3402 $16,000
Pavement Improvements on Route M MODOT 2018-02 5S3230 $3,857,000
Pavement Improvements on Route U MoDOT 2020-05 5S3386 $675,000
Scoping for ADA Improvements in Various
Locations
MoDOT 2018-09 5P3254 $52,000
On-call Work Zone Enforcement MoDOT 2019-05 5P3313 $64,000
On-call Work Zone Enforcement MoDOT 2020-08 5P3406 $64,000
On-call Work Zone Enforcement MoDOT 2020-09 5P3407 $64,000
Traffic Safety Studies MoDOT 2020-11 5S3421 $151,000
Scoping on S. Ten Mile Drive MoDOT 2020-12 5S3418 $10,000
Intersection Improvements MoDOT 2020-14 5P3222 $7,332,000
Intersection Improvements MoDOT 2020-15 5P3195 $7,173,000
Binder Bike Park Phase 1 Osage Region Trail
Association
2020-02 $49,282
Updating Pedestrian Facilities MoDOT 2020-16 5S3369 $13,600,000
Operating Assistance JEFFTRAN 2011-04 $10,959,273
Capital Funding –Vehicles OATS 2018-10 $300,000
Operating Expenses OATS 2018-11 $741,740
Total $87,613,825
Source: CAMPO 2020-2024 Transportation Improvement Program
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
76
COST & REVENUE ESTIMATES
This section includes estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be
available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways and public transportation
within the CAMPO region over the 25-year planning horizon.
CAMPO works with public transportation operators, member jurisdictions, and MoDOT to
cooperatively develop estimates of funds that will be available to support implementation of the
MTP. All necessary financial resources from public sources that are reasonably expected to be
made available to carry out the MTP are identified in this section. There are no private sector
revenue sources identified as contributing to the implementation of the MTP at this time.
Also included in this section is an illustrative list of projects, some showing fiscal constraint and
some not.
Illustrative projects for which additional funding would need to be identified have been assigned
cost ranges, and have been categorized and prioritized.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE 2020-2045
It is anticipated that the CAMPO Region will have approximately $$$$$$$ in Operation and
Maintenance Costs over the planning horizon. The operations and maintenance costs for local
governments include salaries, fringe benefits, materials, and equipment needed to deliver the
street and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities
like minor surface treatments such as sealing, small concrete repairs, pothole patching, mowing,
snow removal, replacing signs, striping, and repairing traffic signals. These activities may be
performed in-house or outsourced.
As a further demonstration of fiscal constraint, Federal Highway Administration has requested
that the municipalities report their operations and maintenance budget. Local government
operations and maintenance on federal aid roads calculated for the system wide average of
operations & maintenance per centerline mile is determined below in Figure 6.2.
Operations and maintenance totals were requested, but have not been provided by Holts
Summit, Taos, or Wardsville. Some of these small communities in the CAMPO region rely entirely
on county and state maintenance of their federal-aid roadways.
Figure 6.2 Operations & Maintenance 2020-2045
Jurisdiction 2019 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE - JURISDICTIONS - COST PER LANE MILE BY JURSIDICTION
Callaway County $2,469 $14,814 $12,345 $12,345 $12,345 $12,345
Cole County $6,724 $40,344 $33,620 $33,620 $33,620 $33,620
Jefferson City $5,888 $35,328 $29,440 $29,440 $29,440 $29,440
St. Martins $5,435 $32,610 $27,175 $27,175 $27,175 $27,175
MODOT $4,870 $29,220 $24,350 $ 24,350 $ 24,350 $ 24,350
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE - TRANSIT - OVERALL COSTS AND MAINTENANCE
JEFFTRAN $ $ $ $ $ $
OATS, Inc. $ $ $ $ $ $
Totals
Source: CAMPO 2020-2024 Transportation Improvement Program
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
77
ANTICIPATED AVAILABLE REVENUE 2020-2045
Figure 6.3 shows forecasted revenues for CAMPO based on information provided by each
jurisdiction. It is anticipated that the CAMPO Region will have approximately $654,141,420 in
available revenue over the planning horizon.
Local revenue forecasts from the CART (County Aid Road Trust) fund, which includes State Fuel
Tax and State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax, are based on past distributions and are assumed to
continue a trend of a 2% inflation rate. The City of Jefferson has a .5% sales tax to support its
Capital Improvement Program and a .5% sales tax for Parks and Recreation, which supports
greenways and other non-motorized transportation activities. The City of Jefferson has provided
its own future revenue projections from these sources. Cole County has a .5% sales tax to
support its Capital Improvement Program and a real property tax levy of $0.27 earmarked for
Road & Bridges. All small cities get $100,000 every five years from Cole County, which comes
from the aforementioned sales tax. Callaway County has a real property tax levy of $0.2466
earmarked for Road & Bridges.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
78
Figure 6.3 Anticipated Available Revenue 2020-2045
Jurisdiction & Revenue
Source 2020-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045
Callaway County
CART $11,173,535 $10,380,834 $11,461,280 $12,654,179 $13,971,236
Property Tax - Road &
Bridge ($0.2466 levy)* $11,400,000 $9,500,000 $9,500,000 $9,500,000 $9,500,000
General Revenue Transfer $1,800,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Cole County
CART $5,229,702 $4,858,683 $5,364,379 $5,922,708 $6,539,148
Sales Tax $32,641,074 $27,200,895 $27,200,895 $27,200,895 $27,200,895
Property Tax - Road &
Bridge ($0.27 levy)* $23,882,280 $19,901,900 $19,901,900 $19,901,900 $19,901,900
Motor Vehicle Sales Tax $2,208,192 $1,840,160 $1,840,160 $1,840,160 $1,840,160
Holts Summit
CART $860,059 $799,043 $882,208 $974,029 $1,075,406
Jefferson City
CART $11,410,689 $10,601,164 $11,704,541 $12,922,759 $14,267,771
Sales Tax - .5% Parks
Sales Tax* $29,711,268 $24,759,390 $24,759,390 $24,759,390 $24,759,390
Sales Tax - .5% Capital
Improvement (Expires
2022)*
$8,520,000 $7,100,000 $7,100,000 $7,100,000 $7,100,000
St. Martins
CART $301,961 $280,538 $309,737 $341,975 $377,568
General Revenue Funds $1,803,254 $1,137,828 $1,319,055 $1,529,146 $1,772,700
Sales Tax - .5% Capital
Improvement** $120,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Taos
CART $232,563 $216,064 $238,552 $263,380 $290,793
Sales Tax - .5% Capital
Improvement** $120,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Wardsville
CART $398,906 $370,606 $409,179 $451,767 $498,787
Sales Tax - .5% Capital
Improvement** $120,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
JEFFTRAN
Farebox &
Reimbursements $1,785,300 $1,380,140 $1,067,926 $826,341 $639,407
Sales Tax - .5% Capital
Improvement (Expires
March 2022)
$480,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
OATS, Inc.
Passenger Fare, Misc. $30,400 $25,500 $25,500 $25,500 $25,500
Local Contracts $400,000 $325,000 $325,000 $325,000 $325,000
Totals $144,629,183 $122,877,745 $125,609,702 $128,739,129 $132,285,661
*Sales Taxes Anticipated to remain flat unless changed and voted upon
**Distributed amount from Cole County
Note: Funds based on 2018 numbers from MoDOT. There is a conservative 2% increase per year, based on historical numbers.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
79
MODOT REVENUE FOR ROADS AND BRIDGES, MULTIMODAL, HIGHWAY SAFETY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
MoDOT’s funding comes from both state and federal sources. Most of the money is dedicated
by federal law or the state constitution and statutes to specific purposes. Included below are the
funds available for roads and bridges and other transportation modes.
Source: MODOT. Citizen’s Guide to Transportation Funding (Financial Snapshot, November 2018).
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
80
ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS
For illustrative purposes, the financial plan includes additional projects that could be completed if
additional resources beyond those identified in the financial plan were to become available.
Some items on these lists have cost estimates or cost ranges associated with them. This section of
the MTP includes:
1. Programmatic Illustrative Projects – Approved by the Board of Directors and Technical
Committee as broad regional or statewide needs.
2. Illustrative Projects (site specific) –Projects in this list were developed by a stakeholder
workgroup and then reviewed, prioritized and approved by Technical Committee and
Board of Directors using the Tier system outlined below.
3. JEFFTRAN Program of Projects – An Illustrative list of transit projects that may be
completed in the next 5 to 10 years dependent upon the Jefferson City annual budget
and availability of federal funds.
4. Future Roads – Identified through the Travel Demand Model and approved by the
Board of Directors.
Additional illustrative projects can be found in the other adopted CAMPO plans in the
appendices. Most of the illustrative items found in those plans are reflected in the lists below.
Other plans that have identified potential illustrative projects include:
• 2016 Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan - Appendix B
• 2017 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan - Appendix C
• 2015 CAMPO Regional Wayfinding Plan - Appendix H
PROGRAMMATIC ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS
In addition to the site specific projects listed in Figures 6. 6-6.8, there are other projects that
have been identified as a need in the region that may require a shift in funding allocation at the
state or local level.
Figure 6.4 Programmatic Illustrative Projects
Category Project
Pedestrian & Non-
Motorized
Increase funding to support safety improvements to pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure at the local level.
System
Performance
Fund the upgrade of US 50 to four lanes to provide an alternative route to
Interstate 70.
System
Performance
Fund expansion and improvements to Interstate 70 including replacement of the
Rocheport bridge over the Missouri River.
System
Performance
Fund expansion of shoulders (min 2’ – 4’) on Missouri numbered and lettered
routes.
System
Performance/
Pedestrian & Non-
Motorized
Create/fund a safety improvement program for small cities with population of
less than 5,000. The program would support small cities making safety
(sidewalks, curb/gutter, crosswalk, signage, etc.) improvements along state
highways that run through their town.
Multi-Modal Transit Capital and Operating Program – maintain and/or increase current level
of service for urban and rural public transportation.
System
Performance
Increase funding for roadway and bridge maintenance to keep infrastructure
good and safe condition.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
81
ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS (SITE SPECIFIC)
This site specific list of illustrative projects
Additional Illustrative Projects to be added to the maps and list below:
1 - Taos - Routes M/Y - Install minimum 2 ft. shoulders along state routes throughout Taos (Tier 2)
2 - Taos Sidewalks - Extend sidewalk along Route M north and south of existing sidewalk (Tier 3)
3 - Taos Trail Connectivity - Create sidewalk/trail connection between Route M and Countryside
Park trail. (Tier 3)
4 - Jefferson City – Rehabilitation of the High St. viaduct over Missouri Blvd. (Tier 2)
Note: The reference numbers used in the following tables and
maps do not denote priority. This number is just a reference
number.
•Regionally Significant: Impacting network users from outside the region and
having major impacts on freight movement moving through the region
•Recognized as a high priority by Board of Directors, stakeholders, and public
•Supported by the 2045 Travel Demand Model
•Supports increased motorized and non-motorized safety and system performance
•Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes
TIER 1
•Recognized as a high priority by Board of Directors, stakeholders, and public
•Most projects in this Tier are supported by the Travel Demand Model
•Supports increased motorized and non-motorized safety and system performance
•Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes
TIER 2
•Designated as a need by stakeholders and general public
•Some projects in this tier are supported by the Travel Demand Model
•Projects in this tier may be completed in phases, dramatically changing cost and
date of completion
•Supports increased motorized and non-motorized safety and system performance
•Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes
TIER 3
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
82
Figure 6.5A Illustrative Projects – System Performance
Source: CAMPO
Figure 6.5B Illustrative Projects – System Performance – Tier 1
System Performance - Tier 1
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
1 Jefferson City US 54 / 63 / 94
(Bluff Rd)
Construct direct connector for
northbound-to-westbound movement to
improve capacity; widen US 54/63 to
provide 3 continuous through lanes in
each direction (in addition to
auxiliary/acceleration/deceleration lanes)
Long-Term
10 years<
$10M<
2 Jefferson City US 50/63, US 54
to Lafayette St
Implement major capacity improvements,
which could include mainline widening,
grade separations, and/or outer roads
Long-Term
10 years<
$10M<
3 Jefferson City US 50 / 63 /54
(Tri-Level)
Reconfigure interchange to provide non-
conflicting system-to-system movements
Long-Term
10 years<
$5M-$10M
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
83
Figure 6.5C Illustrative Projects – System Performance – Tier 2
System Performance - Tier 2
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
4 Callaway
County
US 54 / S. Summit
Dr. Ramps
Addition of ramps to westbound and eastbound US 54
completing the S. Summit Dr. overpass
Long-Term
10 years<
$1M-$5M
5 Jefferson
City
US 50 / Dix Rd Reconfigure interchange and Dix Rd approaches to
address capacity issues including lack of left-turn lanes;
consider dumbbell roundabout interchange; widen Dix
Rd to provide center turn lane and pedestrian access
from US 50 to Missouri Blvd
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
6 Jefferson
City
West Edgewood
@ Stadium
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$5M
7 Jefferson
City
Missouri Blvd,
Eastern Lowe's
entrance to S 10
Mile Dr
Address access management along the corridor,
including turn restrictions, additional traffic control,
and safety.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$10M
8 Jefferson
City
W. Truman Blvd
@ Scott Station
Rd
Signalize or otherwise enhance capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
< $500k
9 Jefferson
City
US-54 NB Ramps
/ Christy Dr /
Stadium /
Jefferson St
Install roundabouts at both hook ramp intersections to
improve operations and address offsets/angles
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$10M
12 Wardsville Route B, Ashbury
Way to Route M
Install roundabout at Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury and
intersection improvements to Rte B / Rte M/ Rte W.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
13 Jefferson
City
US 54 / Ellis Blvd
/ Southwest Blvd
Reconfigure interchange to address capacity and close
spacing of outer roads. Create pedestrian connection
on Southwest/Ellis Blvd from Ford St to Southridge Dr
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
14 Jefferson
City
Southwest Blvd
@ Stadium
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$5M
15 Jefferson
City
Ellis Bl / Green
Berry Rd
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$5M
16 Jefferson
City
Bald Hill Rd /
Seven Hills Rd
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$5M
17 Jefferson
City
US 50 / Truman
Bl / Country Club
Dr
Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road
spacing; widen westbound off-ramp to improve
capacity; incorporate pedestrian facilities into the
interchange
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
21 Jefferson
City
West Edgewood
@ Creek Trail
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$5M
22 Jefferson
City
Missouri Blvd,
Country Club Dr
to Howerton
Widen to 5 lanes; including right turn lane at Howerton
Ct.
Long-Term
10 years<
$5M-$10M
23 Jefferson
City
Country Club Dr,
Truman Blvd to
Rainbow Dr
Widen to provide left-turn lanes at existing and future
access points
Long-Term
10 years<
$1M-$5M
25 Holts
Summit
US 54 / Route OO
/ Simon Bl
Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road
spacing and capacity issues (may involve roundabouts);
incorporate pedestrian facilities crossing US 54
Long-Term
10 years<
$5M-$10M
26 Jefferson
City
Missouri Blvd,
Stoneridge Pkwy
to US 50
Improve access management along Missouri Blvd,
including improvements to intersections, restrictions to
turning movements, and improvements to pedestrian
safety.
Long-Term
10 years<
$5M-$10M
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
84
Figure 6.5C Illustrative Projects – System Performance – Tier 3
System Performance - Tier 3
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
29 Jefferson
City
Madison Street,
Dunklin St to
US-54 Ramps
Add a center turn lane via a combination of
widening and parking removal; address unusual
stop control configuration at Madison Atchison
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
30 Jefferson
City
US 50/63 / Clark
Ave
Reconfigure interchange to address ramp
terminal capacity (likely roundabouts); include
modifications to Clark/Miller and Clark/Dunklin
intersections to improve corridor operations
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$10M
31 Holts
Summit
US 54 / Center St Improve interchange capacity and east-side
outer road spacing with roundabouts at
terminals
Long-Term
10 years<
$1M-$10M
32 Cole County Rock Ridge Rd /
Wildwood Dr
extension
Add left-turn lane on Rock Ridge to improve
capacity after completion of extension
Long-Term
10 years<
$1M-$5M
33 Jefferson
City
MO 179, Industrial
Dr to Sue Dr
Add left-turn lanes at Sue Dr, Cherry Creek Ct,
and Fire Station north driveway
Long-Term
10 years<
$500k-$5M
34 Jefferson
City
MO 179 and
Truman Blvd
Reconfigure intersection with roundabout Long-Term
10 years<
$1M-$5M
35 Cole County Bridge
Replacement /
Tanner Bridge Rd
Bridge Replacement on Tanner Bridge Rd. over
Moreau River
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
36 Wardsville Route B, Tanner
Bridge Rd to
Friendship Rd
Install roundabouts at two locations to improve
capacity: Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury, Rte B / Rte
M; widen to four lanes in each direction on Rte
B for several hundred feet south of Tanner
Bridge Rd and reconfigure intersection; Widen
Rte B to provide TWLT
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
39 Jefferson
City
Swifts Hwy /
Jefferson St
Reconfigure to fix sight distance issues; widen
Swifts Hwy approach
Long-Term
10 years<
$50K-$100k
40 Holts
Summit
S. Summit Dr /
Perrey Dr /
Hibernia Ln / Holt
Ln
Redesign intersection to address offset and
sight distance
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
41 Holts
Summit
Spalding Rd/ Park Install drainage improvements. Curb and gutter
could cause surface flooding for adjoining
properties.
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
42 Holts
Summit
N. Summit Dr and
Mars St
Intersection
Install drainage improvements ΓÇô box culvert. Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
43 Holts
Summit
Van Horn Rd /
Julie Ln
Redesign intersection to address offset and
sight distance
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
47 St. Martins Route T/D & Bus
50 W Intersection
Reconfigure intersection with roundabout Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$1M
48 Holts
Summit
Nieman Rd /
Halifax Rd / Major
Terr
Address offset and skew by installing
roundabout or realigning east leg
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
49 Holts
Summit
E Simon Blvd, ~0.4
mi east of
Jefferson Rd
Replace undersized culvert. Install new bridge Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
85
Figure 6.6A Illustrative Projects – Multi-Modal
Source: CAMPO
Figure 6.6B Illustrative Projects – Multi-Modal – Tier 2
Multi-Modal - Tier 2
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
18 Jefferson City JEFFTRAN Transit
Facilities
Construction of a new facilities for
JEFFTRAN that would provide better
accommodations for transit riders and
staff, including, but not limited to; a bus
barn, washing bays, central maintenance
facilities, and administrative offices
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
19 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Amtrak Station
Renovation or replacement of the Amtrak
Train Station in Jefferson City
Long-Term
10 years<
<$100M
20 Jefferson City/
Cole County/
Callaway County
Missouri River Port Construction of a port facility in either
Callaway County or Cole County as
specified in the Central Missouri
Multimodal Port Feasibility Study.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$10M<
27 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Memorial Airport
Reconstruction of Runway 9/27 Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
28 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Memorial Airport
Construction of new air traffic control
tower.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
86
Figure 6.6C Illustrative Projects – Multi-Modal – Tier 3
Multi-Modal - Tier 3
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
37 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Memorial Airport -
Runway 9 and 9/27
Relocate Runway 9 and Extend Runway
9/27 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport.
Long-
Term 10
years<
$5M-$10M
38 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Memorial Airport -
Runway 12/30
Extension and Widening of runway 12/30
at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport.
Long-
Term 10
years<
$10M<
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
87
Figure 6.8A Illustrative Projects – Pedestrian and Non-Motorized
Source: CAMPO
Figure 6.8B Illustrative Projects – Pedestrian & Non-Motorized – Tier 2
Pedestrian & Non-Motorized - Tier 2
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
10 Holts Summit S. Summit Drive,
Simon to Center
Install sidewalks with some curb and gutter
and drop inlets
Long-
Term 10
years<
$500K-$1M
11 Jefferson City Missouri Blvd, W.
Main St. to
Stadium Blvd.
Complete connectivity between segments
of sidewalk and install
crosswalks/pedestrian refuges as needed.
Near-
Term 5-
10 years
$1M-$5M
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
88
Figure 6.8C Illustrative Projects – Pedestrian & Non-Motorized – Tier 3
Pedestrian & Non-Motorized - Tier 3
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
24 Jefferson
City
Bolivar St. Greenway Design and construct a greenway
extension from the Dunklin St. Trailhead
to McCarty St.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$1M
44 Jefferson
City
Southwest Blvd & Dix
Rd Intersection
Install pedestrian-activated beacon or
similar warning device
Near-Term
5-10 years
< $50K
45 Jefferson
City
Dix Road, W. Main to
Missouri Bl
Improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities
along the corridor
Near-Term
5-10 years
< $500k
46 St. Martins/
Cole County
Route T, Bus 50 to
Elston
Install shoulders to accomodate cyclists
and pedestrians.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
50 Holts
Summit
Karen Dr, Center to
Thompson
Install sidewalk and crosswalks Near-Term
5-10 years
$500K-$1M
51 Holts
Summit
Halifax Rd, Center to
Nieman
Install sidewalk and crosswalks Near-Term
5-10 years
$500K-$1M
52 St. Martins/
Cole County
Route T, Henwick Ln
to Bus 50 W
Install curb, gutter & sidewalk in each
direction
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
53 CAMPO Bike lane installation
in CAMPO Region
Continue expansion of bike lanes in the
downtown area.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$50K-$100k
54 CAMPO CAMPO Greenway
Connectivity
Continue to expand greenways to connect
cities in the CAMPO Region
Long-Term
10 years<
$10M<
55 Jefferson
City
Jefferson City
Greenway Projects
Locations may include; Fairgrounds Acres
to County Park, South Country Club Drive
to Turtle Creek subdivision, Ellis-Porter
Riverside Park connector from St. Louis
Road, Wears Creek to East Branch
Connector, Frog Hollow Phase 4, Creek
Trail to W. Edgewoo
Near-Term
5-10 years
$50k-$1M
56 Jefferson
City
Missouri Blvd and S.
Ten MIle, Stoneridge
Pkwy to S. Country
Club
Install Sidewalks and crosswalks along
route with pedestrian accesss over MO
179 provided via a pedestrian bridge
connecting S. Ten Mile east and west
segments
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
89
JEFFTRAN PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
Figure 6.8 outlines an Illustrative list of transit projects that may be completed in the next 5 to 10
years dependent upon the Jefferson City annual budget and availability of federal funds..
Figure 6.8 Program Projects
JEFFTRAN Program of Projects
Description Total Cost
Other
Funding
Local
Funding
1 Replace paratransit wide body cutaway buses $150,000 $120,000 $30,000
2 Replace paratransit software and associated
hardware
$30,000 $24,000 $6,000
3 Replace low-floor minivan support vehicle $40,000 $0 $40,000
4 Replace transit administration vehicle $30,000 $30,000
5 Upgrade/replace fare card system $300,000 $240,000 $60,000
6 Repair Transfer Facility Roof (Bus Transfer Shelter) $12,000 $0 $12,000
7 Transit facility improvements--ridge cap/flashing
replacements/roof repair on bus barn
$50,000 $40,000 $10,000
8 Security upgrades for transit facilities $30,000 $24,000 $6,000
9 Replace outdated bus security camera systems $60,000 $48,000 $12,000
10 Update/revise Transit facilities feasibility study $150,000 $0 $150,000
11 Purchase and install bus shelters at various
locations in Jefferson City
$30,000 $24,000 $6,000
12 Transit facility improvements, including replace
overhead doors and door operators
$95,000 $76,000 $19,000
13 JEFFTRAN lighted signs for exterior of transit
facilities
$15,000 $12,000 $3,000
14 Purchase emergency back-up generator &
switches for transit and CM facilities
$100,000 $80,000 $20,000
15 Replace low-floor route buses $3,000,000 $2,400,000 $600,000
16 Construct new transit facilities and central
maintenance facilities
$7,000,000 $5,600,000 $1,400,000
17 Transit admin facility rehab $50,000 $40,000 $10,000
18 Purchase and install additional transit traveler
kiosks (each)
$15,000 $12,000 $3,000
19 Add bike racks at passenger transfer facilities
and selected bus stops
$5,000 $0 $5,000
20 Enhance/replace security systems for buses and
transit facilities
$20,000 $16,000 $4,000
21 Charging systems/electrical upgrades for buses $100,000 $80,000 $20,000
22 Add crosswalks to various locations around the city $60,000 $0 $60,000
23 Rehabilitate/replace bus wash facility $100,000 $80,000 $20,000
Source: JEFFTRAN March 2019
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
90
FUTURE ROADS
The list below includes recommended or proposed future roads that have been identified by the
Travel Demand Model or stakeholders. If development in the region occurs as predicted by the
preferred scenario, see Section 3, these roads would improve efficiency and system
performance. Figure 6.x shows the general location of these future roadways. It should be
noted that the exact placement of the road will be dictated by more intensive study and
engineering as development occurs. More information about the development of the future road
locations can be found in Appendix D.
1. Wildwood Extension
2. Militia Drive Extension to Liberty Road
3. Schotthill Woods Drive Extension to Schott Road
4. Mission Drive Extension to Rock Ridge Road
5. S. Summit Drive Ramp Additions
6. Stoneridge Parkway Extension to W. Edgewood Drive
7. Mission Drive to Stadium Boulevard Connection
8. Missouri State Penitentiary Parkway
Figure 6.9 2045 Future Roads
Source: CAMPO
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
91
LOCAL FUNDING SOURCES
Sales tax provides most of the transportation revenue at the local level. Local revenue sources
for operations and maintenance include state fuel tax, state vehicles sales/use tax, local sales
taxes, franchise fees, license & permit fees, property taxes, and other revenue sources that
provide significant resources for local general funds and specific funding of transportation. Not
all taxes and fees go to transportation, so the local jurisdiction will usually identify a budget
specifically for transportation purposes, such as capital improvements program or operations
and maintenance budgets. Local finance initiatives, otherwise known as special taxing districts,
may also provide additional revenue to be used on specific transportation needs within a
designated development area.
TAXES
All jurisdictions in the CAMPO Region receive funding via the state fuel tax or a designated sales
tax or property tax, see Figure 6.1. Local revenue also supports JEFFTRAN in Jefferson City
through the City’s Capital Improvement Program. These taxes are critical to transportation
maintenance and improvements. Revenue projections stemming from these taxes are outlined in
greater detail in Section 6 under Anticipated Available Revenue.
Figure 6.1 Local Funding Sources by Jurisdiction
Callaway County County Aid Road Trust - State Fuel Tax
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($.2466 levy)
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement
Cole County County Aid Road Trust - State Fuel Tax
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($.27 levy)
Holts Summit County Aid Road Trust - State Fuel Tax
Jefferson City and JEFFTRAN County Aid Road Trust - State Fuel Tax
Sales Tax - 1/2% Parks Sales Tax
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement
St. Martins County Aid Road Trust - State Fuel Tax
Taos County Aid Road Trust - State Fuel Tax
Wardsville County Aid Road Trust - State Fuel Tax
Source: CAMPO Transportation Improvement Program 2020-2024
LOCAL FINANCE INITIATIVES & SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Local Finance Initiatives are incentive programs that financially assist development activities.
Each program is designed to address a specific development need by or assist a specific type of
developer, including local governments, not-for-profit organizations, for-profit developers,
community development corporations, volunteer organizations or others.
Community Improvement Districts (CID)provide funding for certain public
improvements or services in the designated benefit area. Funding may be through a
special tax on sales, special assessment on certain real property or by fees, rents or
charges generated in the District.
Local Option Economic Development Sales Tax allows citizens to authorize a
supplemental sales tax dedicated exclusively for certain economic development
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
92
initiatives in their home municipality.
Neighborhood Improvement Districts (NID) finance certain public facilities,
improvements or redevelopment in the designated benefit area. Funding is accomplished
by issue of general obligation bonds of the governing municipality.
Property Tax Abatement is offered to private companies for certain urban
redevelopment or industrial development projects by cities and counties.
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) provides local tax financial assistance for the
redevelopment of designated economically depressed areas. TIF allows the use of a
portion of certain new local tax revenues generated for a limited number of years in the
redevelopment area to help pay for the redevelopment.
Jefferson City has four areas in the City where Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is used,
Including the Capital Mall, High Street in the Downtown area, the Southside
Neighborhood along Dunklin Street, and the old St. Mary’s Hospital site. Funds
generated from the TIFs in these areas can assist with restoration, construction,
demolition, sidewalk installation, engineering, stormwater mitigation, and more.
Transportation Development Districts (TDD) are created for the purpose of
developing, improving, maintaining or operating one or more projects relative to the
transportation needs of the benefit area, related to streets and highways, railroads or
urban light rail, aviation, bus or other mass transit, river port, ferry or any other
conveyance and related infrastructures within the broad definition of transportation.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
93
STATE FUNDING SOURCES
STATE HIGHWAY USER REVENUES
Cities and counties within CAMPO planning area receive State Highway Revenue each year.
These revenues come from Motor Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales Tax, and Motor Vehicle Fees.
For Counties, the revenue distribution is based on the ratio of a county’s rural road mileage to
the total of county rural road mileage of the state, and the ratio of the County’s assessed total
county rural land valuation as portion of the total state rural land valuation.
For cities, a city’s share is distributed according to population, based on the ratio of the city
population to the population of all the cities in the state.
*Requires certification by the Commissioner of Administration and the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission
Source: MoDOT
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
94
STATE PARTNERSHIP FUNDING PROGRAMS (REPAYMENT REQUIRED)
Statewide Transportation Assistance Revolving Fund (STAR Fund) – The STAR Fund
was created to assist in the planning, acquisition, development and construction of
transportation facilities other than highways in the state.
Missouri Transportation Finance Corporation (MTFC) – A non-profit lending
corporation established to assist local transportation projects, and to administer the STAR
Fund.
State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) - A SIB is an investment fund at the state level with the
ability to make loans and provide other forms of credit assistance to public and private
entities to carry out transportation projects.
STATE PARTNERSHIP DEBT-FINANCING PROGRAMS (REPAYMENT NOT REQUIRED)
Cost Sharing Program: Projects where MoDOT commits a portion of project costs for
projects not on the department's right-of-way and construction program, but that will
benefit the state highway system.
Economic Development Program: A method of funding projects that will significantly
impact the economic development in a given area.
Transportation Corporations: specialized, temporary, private, not-for-profit
corporations that can be organized to plan, develop, and finance a particular
transportation project. Transportation Corporations accounted for $10, 528,000 in
funding for MO Rt. 179 from FY 2005 to 2007.
MISSOURI ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM (MEHTAP)
MEHTAP provides state financial assistance for public and nonprofit organizations offering
transportation services to the elderly and disabled at below-cost rates.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
95
FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES
Federal transportation funding sources include grant and loan programs administered by a
handful of agencies. For the purposes of this plan, sources that cannot be used within the
CAMPO planning area have been excluded.
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) PROGRAMS
An agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA supports State and local
governments in the design, construction, and maintenance of the Nation’s highway system
(Federal Aid Highway Program) and various federally and tribal owned lands (Federal Lands
Highway Program). FHWA provides State and local governments with financial and technical
assistance.
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of the National Highway
System (NHS), for the construction of new facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that
investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support
progress toward the achievement of performance targets established in a State's asset
management plan for the NHS.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
HSIP supports a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public
roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on tribal lands
Railway-Highway Crossings (set-aside from HSIP)
A set-aside from HSIP, this program funds safety improvements to reduce the number of
fatalities, injuries, and crashes at public grade crossings.
Transportation Alternatives (TA)
Administered by MoDOT, TA replaces the previous Transportation Alternatives Program
(TAP) and with a set-aside of Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program
funding. These set-aside funds include all projects and activities that were previously
eligible under TAP.
Recent funded projects in the CAMPO Region:
Jefferson City
Holts Summit
St. Martins
Cole County
Traffic Engineering Assistance Program (TEAP)
Administered by MoDOT, TEAP allows local public agencies to receive engineering
assistance to study traffic engineering problems. Eligible projects include: corridor
safety and/or operational analysis, intersection(s) safety and/or operational analysis,
speed limit review, sign inventory, pedestrian/bike route analysis, parking issues, and
other traffic studies, etc.
Recent funded projects in the CAMPO Region:
Jefferson City
Holts Summit
St. Martins
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
96
Cole County
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) PROGRAMS
An agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation, the FTA provides financial and technical
assistance to local public transit systems, including buses, subways, light rail, commuter rail,
trolleys and ferries. FTA also oversees safety measures and helps develop next-generation
technology research.
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
This program provides grants to Urbanized Areas (UZA) for public transportation
capital, planning, job access and reverse commute projects, as well as operating
expenses in certain circumstances.
Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons with disabilities by
providing funds for programs to serve the special needs of transit-dependent
populations beyond traditional public transportation services and Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit services.
Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas
This program provides capital, planning, and operating assistance to states to support
public transportation in rural areas with populations less than 50,000, where many
residents often rely on public transit to reach their destinations.
BUILD AMERICA BUREAU
Administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Build America Bureau serves as the
single point of contact and coordination for states, municipalities and project sponsors looking to
utilize federal transportation expertise, apply for federal transportation credit programs and
explore ways to access private capital in public private partnerships. The Bureau streamlines
credit opportunities and grants and provides access to the credit and grant programs with more
speed and transparency, while also providing technical assistance and encouraging innovative
best practices in project planning, financing, delivery, and monitoring.
Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act (TIFIA)
This program provides credit assistance for qualified projects of regional and national
significance. Many large-scale, surface transportation projects, including highway,
transit, rail, intermodal freight, and port access are eligible for assistance. Eligible
applicants include state and local governments, transit agencies, railroad companies,
special authorities/districts, and private entities. The TIFIA credit program is designed to
fill market gaps and leverage private co-investment.
Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Grants
This program provides dedicated, discretionary funding for projects that address critical
highway and bridge issues. The grants support fixing infrastructure by creating
opportunities for all levels of government and the private sector to fund infrastructure,
using innovative approaches.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
97
Public Participation Plan
Limited English Proficiency Plan
Title VI Plan
IMPLEMENTATION
CAMPO actively plans for and facilitates improvements to the region’s transportation system
through an inclusive process, which includes the general public, city and county leaders, regional
stakeholders, and the Technical Committee and Board of Directors. The Vision, Goals, and
Strategies outlined in Section 2 guide implementation activities and play an integral role in the
development of required plans and documents as outlined below.
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM (UPWP)
The UPWP in updated annually and includes a detailed budget and description of tasks and
activities that CAMPO will work on during that period. The tasks and activities outline in the
UPWP are directly guided by the goals and strategies outlined in the MTP. These tasks and
activities are integral to CAMPO providing service to member communities and to the continued
success of the planning process and state wide planning framework.
Metropolitan
Transportation
Plan
Priorities
(Projects and Strategies)
Transportation
Improvement
Program
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
98
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)
As stated previously in this section, the annually updated TIP is a 5-year financial program of
transportation projects to be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area. Projects in the
TIP are consistent with strategies discussed in the MTP and are developed in cooperation with the
MoDOT, local jurisdictions, and public transportation operators. Projects outlined in the TIP
constitute the first five years of fiscally constrained projects to be implemented in the CAMPO
MPA. The TIP is located in Appendix A.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN (PPP), LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY PLAN (LEP), &
TITLE VI PLAN
The development of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond MTP and subsequent Implementation Plan is
consistent with the PPP. CAMPO is required to seek input from the public and stakeholders in the
development of all planning documents. This process is outlined in the PPP and reflected in the
strategies laid out in the LEP and Title VI Plan. As stipulated in the PPP, CAMPO provides the
following groups a reasonable opportunity to comment on the transportation plan:
• individuals
• affected public agencies
• representatives of public transportation employees
• public ports, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services
• private and public transportations providers and their representatives
• representatives of users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities
• representatives of the disabled
• any other interested parties
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
99
IMPLEMENTATION OF STRATEGIES
The goals and strategies listed below re-iterate those outlined in Section 2, and include a
schedule for addressing the strategies over the next five years. As strategies are implemented
and funding is made available, strategies or projects may be programed into the UPWP or TIP.
After being reviewed by stakeholders, public, and the CAMPO Technical Committee the
strategies were categorized as follows:
Ongoing Strategies that are currently activities that CAMPO is currently working on.
Short Range Strategies that CAMPO will work toward addressing in the next 1-2 years.
Long Range Strategies that CAMPO will work toward addressing in the next 3-5 years.
1. Improve safety and security for all travel modes
a. Identify locations for safety improvements Short Range
b. Improve collaboration between CAMPO and public safety agencies Short Range
c. Assist with railroad related safety and access improvements such as the boarding
platform, crossings, and right-of-way areas Long Range
d. Encourage collaboration between law enforcement and transit agencies concerning
security camera use Short Range
2. Support economic development and tourism throughout the region
a. Seek funding and provide support for improvements and access to the airport, transit,
and the river port Long Range
b. Improve accessibility to recreational and cultural opportunities Long Range
c. Expanding wayfinding throughout the region Long Range
d. Support creation of shuttle services for local and regional events Short Range
3. Support regional partnerships and planning continuity across the region.
a. Develop data in support of member jurisdictions’ comprehensive plans Ongoing
b. Provide a forum for sharing planning best practices or processes Ongoing
c. Strengthen collaboration with regional planning agencies Ongoing
4. Improve efficiency in system management, operations, and movement of people and freight
a. Maintain and update a regional travel demand model Long Range
b. Support access management programs Long Range
c. Identify current or potential congestion locations or bottlenecks Short Range
d. Identify potential locations for connection improvements Short Range
e. Improve existing inter-modal and multi-modal facilities Long Range
f. Support improvements to freight and people movement via rail, air, and river port
access Long Range
g. Improve inter-city and inter-regional transit operations and connectivity Long Range
h. Improve parking and services specific to freight hauler needs Long Range
i. Support development and implementation of local parking studies Short Range
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
100
5. Support land use practices that promote quality of life and economic vitality
a. Develop and maintain land use data in support of MPO and regional planning
partner needs Ongoing
b. Support member jurisdictions’ plans for connectivity to parks, trails, and open space Ongoing
c. Provide mapping and data development support to local communities Ongoing
6. Seek secure and reliable funding
a. Provide assistance to regional stakeholders in seeking grants and completing
applications Ongoing
b. Maintain a prioritized comprehensive list of illustrative transportation projects Ongoing
c. Continue to maintain a Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Ongoing
d. Maintain a list of funding sources and opportunities Ongoing
e. Alert member jurisdictions of available funding resources as they are announced Ongoing
f. Collaborate with regional partners in leveraging funds or applying for grants Ongoing
7. Improve accessibility and mobility
a. Identify barriers to accessibility and mobility (sidewalks, crosswalks, signals, signage,
etc.) Short Range
b. Support development of ADA transition plans among member jurisdictions Short Range
c. Support improvements to and expansion of passenger rail service Long Range
d. Maintain and update the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Long Range
e. Maintain and update the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation
Plan Long Range
f. Review and update documents that support improvements to accessibility such as the
Title VI Plan, Limited English Proficiency Plan (LEP), and Public Participation Plan (PPP) Short Range
8. Maintain a resilient transportation system
a. Encourage preservation of motorized and non-motorized transportation corridors for
future growth Short Range
b. Maintain a database of existing infrastructure and assets for use by regional
partners Ongoing
c. Develop and maintain an accurate Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Ongoing
d. Provide support in maintaining the MoDOT Transportation Management System (TMS) Ongoing
e. Support implementation of individual or collaborative pavement and bridge
management systems Short Range
f. Maintain an updated performance management plan Short Range
9. Provide a platform for multi-modal transportation education
a. Facilitate, promote and participate in local and regional educational activities Ongoing
b. Develop and disseminate educational tools and resources such as brochures, maps,
videos, and other media Ongoing
c. Maintain a consistent public outreach schedule to keep members, planning partners,
and the public informed about new innovations or transportation trends Ongoing
d. Strengthen CAMPO’s social media presence Ongoing
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
101
STRATEGIES FROM OTHER ADOPTED PLANS
Additional strategies can be found in the other adopted CAMPO plans in the appendices. Most
of the strategies found in those plans are reflected in the list above. Other plans that have
identified potential illustrative projects include:
• 2016 Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan - Appendix B
• 2017 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan - Appendix C
• 2015 CAMPO Regional Wayfinding Plan - Appendix H
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN 2020 – TO BE COMPLETED
CAMPO currently depends on the County-Wide Transportation Study for Cole County and the
Thoroughfare Plan for Jefferson City to illustrate an adopted future road network. After
completion and adoption of the CAMPO 2045 MTP staff will undertake the task of creating a
Major Thoroughfare Plan for the CAMPO Region as a whole.
The CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan will provide an indication of the general locations and capacities
needed to meet the future needs of the CAMPO Region. The new plan will incorporate products
from the Cole County and Jefferson City plans as well as the completed Travel Demand Model
and any other pertinent recommendations from other local and regional plans.
The Plan will act as a guide for both municipalities and the private sector in making future
decisions involving new or existing roadways and will include future and current roadway
functional classifications.
Ideally, the CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan will:
• Provide for the efficient movement of vehicular traffic into and throughout the Region.
• Identify the right-of-way needs to be dedicated to accommodate a proposed
thoroughfare.
• Ensure adequate roadways to serve existing and proposed developments.
• Assist in identifying Capital Improvement Program needs
• Reduce the traffic volumes in residential areas by ensuring adequate arterials.
• Serve as a planning tool and assist coordination with other agencies.
The Thoroughfare Plan will be located in the Appendices once adopted by the CAMPO Board of
Directors.
CAPITAL AREA PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PLAN
The Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan is intended as a resource to improve safety,
connectivity, and mobility for pedestrian and bicycle users in the CAMPO region. The goals and
strategies outlined in the plan can be used by jurisdictions to develop an individualized
implementation strategy to fit the unique pedestrian and bicycle needs of that community.
The implementation section of the plan lays out a strategy for the CAMPO region to achieve the
goals and objectives of the plan. Included, are strategies, performance measures, and timelines
to guide and track the implementation process. Also included, is an illustrative list of projects and
a list of funding options that can be used to support these items.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN;kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org
102
It is important to reiterate the role of CAMPO in the implementation of the Capital Area
Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan. Although the CAMPO region includes six incorporated communities
and portions of two counties, it has no direct influence over any jurisdiction within its borders.
However, CAMPO can assist local jurisdictions with developing a community specific
implementation strategy referencing the goals and recommendations laid out in this plan. It is
the jurisdictions responsibility to implement the plan. The Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle
Plan can be found in Appendix B.
DRAFT
APPENDICES
DRAFT
Appendix A
2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program
DRAFT
Appendix B
2016 Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan
DRAFT
Appendix C
2017 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan
DRAFT
Appendix D
Travel Demand Model Report
DRAFT
Appendix E
System Performance Report
The CAMPO System Performance Report presents the condition and performance of the transportation system with
regard to performance measures, performance targets, and progress achieved in meeting targets.
This is the first System Performance Report for CAMPO and thus reports performance measures and targets. Future
reports will contain comparisons to evaluate progress made in achieving targets.
PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMING (PBPP)
Performance-based Planning and Programing (PBPP) is a requirement of the FAST Act and impacts both the MTP
and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). PBPP refers to the application of transportation performance
management (TPM) principles within the planning and programming processes of transportation agencies to
achieve desired performance outcomes for the multimodal transportation system. CAMPO uses a performance-
based approach to transportation decision making to support the national federal highway performance goals
listed below.
NATIONAL FEDERAL HIGHWAY PERFORMANCE GOALS
• Safety - To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.
• Infrastructure Condition - To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair
• Congestion Reduction - To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System
• System Reliability - To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system
• Freight Movement and Economic Vitality - To improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability
of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic
development.
• Environmental Sustainability - To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting
and enhancing the natural environment.
• Reduced Project Delivery Delays - To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite
the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the
project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies'
work practices
DRAFT
Federal Performance Measures
CAMPO has adopted targets and measures in four areas: Safety, Pavement & Bridge, System Performance, and
Transit Asset Management. Listed below are the four performance areas.
SAFETY
FAST Act/ MAP-21 was the first transportation reauthorization bill requiring target setting collaboration between
State DOTs and planning partners on national performance measures. Targets are required to be set in 2017 for
five safety performance measures using five-year rolling averages. Annual targets must be set by State DOTs, then
by each MPO, with the choice of adopting state targets or establishing their own for:
• Number of Fatalities;
• Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million Vehicle Miles traveled (VMT);
• Number of Serious Injuries;
• Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT; and
• Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-motorized Serious Injuries
The first three performance measures must be reported in the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) for NHTSA. All five
performance measures must be reported in the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) for FHWA. When
targets are not met, the State DOT must spend the full HSIP allocation in one fiscal year and submit an HSIP
implementation plan to FHWA detailing how the State DOT plans to meet its targets.
MoDOT established the following statewide safety targets in 2018, as seen in Figure 1, which shows the targets set
by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. These targets are updated annually.
Figure 1 – Safety Performance Targets Set by MoDOT*
Performance Measure 5-year Rolling
Average
(2013-2017)
5-Year Rolling Average
Statewide Target for
CY2019
Number of Fatalities 854.4 872.3
Fatality rate per 100 Million VMT 1.176 1.160
Number of Serious Injuries 4756.4 4433.8
Serious Injury Rate per 100 Million VMT 6.566 6.168
Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 441.3 445.4
* Targets based on the State Highway Safety Plan: Missouri Blueprint -A Partnership Towards Zero Deaths, a 9% fatality reduction, 5% serious injury
reduction, 1% VMT increase and 4 % non-motorized reduction
DRAFT
PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE
On May 20, 2017, the FHWA’s final PM2 rule on pavement and bridge condition performance measures to
address new requirements established by MAP-21 and the FAST Act took effect.
The Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance Measures final rule, published in the Federal Register on January
18, 2017, establishes measures for State DOTs to carry out the NHPP and to assess the condition of pavements on
the non-Interstate NHS; pavements on the Interstate System; and bridges carrying the NHS, including on- and off-
ramps connected to the NHS.
This final rule includes six measures are:
• percentage of pavements on the Interstate System in Good condition
• percentage of pavements on the Interstate System in Poor condition
• percentage of pavements on the NHS (excluding the Interstate System) in Good condition
• percentage of pavements on the NHS (excluding the Interstate System) in Poor condition
• percentage of NHS bridges in Good condition
• percentage of NHS bridges in Poor condition
There are no interstate highways in the CAMPO region, so those targets are not addressed.
MoDOT established the following statewide pavement and bridge targets in 2018, as seen in Figure 2, which
shows the targets set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. These targets may be updated every other year.
Figure 2 – Applicable Pavement and Bridge Targets set by MoDOT
Performance Measure
2017
Baseline
2019
Target
2021
Target
Percentage of NHS Bridges in Good Condition 34.0% 30.9% 30.9%
Percentage of NHS Bridges in Poor Condition 7.1% 7.1% 7.1%
Percentage of non-Interstate NHS Pavements in Good Condition 61.1% 61.1% 61.1%
Percentage of non-Interstate NHS Pavements in Poor Condition 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
DRAFT
TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY AND FREIGHT RELIABILITY
The System Performance final rule, published in the Federal Register on January 18, 2017 and effective on May
20, 2017, sets forth measures that State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) and Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPOs) will use to report on the following characteristics within their jurisdiction:
• the performance of the Interstate and non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) to carry out the
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP);
• freight movement on the Interstate system; and
• traffic congestion and on-road mobile source emissions for the purpose of carrying out the Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program.
This System Performance/Freight/CMAQ Performance Measures final rule includes six measures:
• Interstate Travel Time Reliability Measure: Percent of Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate that are
Reliable
• Non-Interstate Travel Time Reliability Measure: Percent of Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate
NHS that are Reliable
• Freight Reliability Measure: Truck Travel Time Reliability Index
• Peak Hour Excessive Delay (PHED) Measure: Annual Hours of PHED Per Capita
• Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle Travel (SOV) Measure: Percent of non-SOV Travel
• On-Road Mobile Emissions: Total Emissions Reduction
There are no interstate highways in the CAMPO region, so those targets are not addressed. The CMAQ measures
do not apply to the CAMPO region, so the PHED, Non-SOV and On-Road mobile emissions targets are not
addressed.
MoDOT established the following travel time reliability target in 2018, as seen in Figure 3, which shows the target
set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. This target may be updated every other year.
Figure 3 – Applicable Travel Time Reliability Target set by MoDOT
Performance Measure 2017
Baseline
2019
Target
2021
Target
Non-Interstate Travel Time Reliability Measure: Percent of Reliable Person-
Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS
92.3% - 87.8%
DRAFT
TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Transit Asset Management is the strategic and systematic practice of procuring, operating, inspecting, maintaining,
rehabilitating, and replacing transit capital assets to manage their performance, risk, and costs over their life
cycles for the purpose of providing safe, cost-effective, and reliable public transportation.
The TAM final rule requires every transit provider that receives federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 53 to develop a TAM plan or be part of a Group TAM Plan prepared by a sponsor (MoDOT). All TAM
plans must contain four major components:
• Asset Inventory: A register (comprehensive list) of agency’s assets and specific information about those
assets. The inventory is broken into four categories: Equipment, Rolling Stock, Facilities (maintenance and
administration), and Infrastructure.
• Condition Assessment: The process of assessing and documenting the condition or residual life of an asset.
This process provides an overall assessment of equipment, maintenance and administration facilities.
• Management Approach – Decision Support Tools: An analytic process or methodology to help prioritize
projects to improve and maintain the State of Good Repair of capital assets, based on available condition
data, objective criteria and financial needs for asset investments over time.
• Investment Prioritization: A transit provider’s ranking of capital projects or programs to achieve or maintain
a SGR based on financial resources from all sources a transit provider reasonably anticipates will be
available over the TAM Plan period. This section includes but is not limited to performance measures,
targets, and proposed investments.
MoDOT collected and evaluated existing buses and facilities to be included in the State Transit Asset Management
Plan and used this information to set targets, which will be evaluated on an annual basis as inventory changes.
JEFFTRAN opted to create its own Transit Asset Management Plan and set its own targets, which are identical to the
state targets, as listed below, and adopted by CAMPO.
Figure 4 – Transit Asset Management targets by MoDOT and JEFFTRAN
JEFFTRAN TAM Plan Fiscal Year 2019 Targets
Equipment: Non-revenue support-service and maintenance
vehicles (exceeding $50,000 at purchase) N/A
Rolling Stock: Revenue vehicles by mode and ULB*:
Automobiles, Minivans, Vans 8 years 45%
Cutaways 10 years 45%
Buses 14 years 45%
Facilities
Administrative facilities and passenger stations
30% with a condition rating below 3.0 on
FTA's TERM** Scale
Maintenance facilities
25% with a condition rating below 3.0 on
FTA's TERM Scale
* ULB stands for Useful Life Benchmark
** TERM is a Federal Transit Administration Transit Economic Requirements Model which helps transit agencies assess their state of good repair backlog, level of
annual investment to attain state of good repair, impact of variations in funding, and investment priorities.
DRAFT
Appendix F
MTP Planning Requirements - §450.324 CFR
§450.324 Development and content of the metropolitan transportation plan. Section
(a) The metropolitan transportation planning process shall include the development of a transportation plan addressing
no less than a 20-year planning horizon as of the effective date. In formulating the transportation plan, the MPO shall
consider factors described in §450.306 as the factors relate to a minimum 20-year forecast period. In nonattainment
and maintenance areas, the effective date of the transportation plan shall be the date of a conformity determination
issued by the FHWA and the FTA. In attainment areas, the effective date of the transportation plan shall be its date of
adoption by the MPO. Whole Plan
(b) The transportation plan shall include both long-range and short-range strategies/actions that provide for the
development of an integrated multimodal transportation system (including accessible pedestrian walkways and bicycle
transportation facilities) to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods in addressing current and
future transportation demand. Implementation
Plan
(c) The MPO shall review and update the transportation plan at least every 4 years in air quality nonattainment and
maintenance areas and at least every 5 years in attainment areas to confirm the transportation plan's validity and
consistency with current and forecasted transportation and land use conditions and trends and to extend the forecast
period to at least a 20-year planning horizon. In addition, the MPO may revise the transportation plan at any time
using the procedures in this section without a requirement to extend the horizon year. The MPO shall approve the
transportation plan (and any revisions) and submit it for information purposes to the Governor. Copies of any updated
or revised transportation plans must be provided to the FHWA and the FTA.
Whole Plan
(d) In metropolitan areas that are in nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide, the MPO shall coordinate the
development of the metropolitan transportation plan with the process for developing transportation control measures
(TCMs) in a State Implementation Plan (SIP). N/A
(e) The MPO, the State(s), and the public transportation operator(s) shall validate data used in preparing other existing
modal plans for providing input to the transportation plan. In updating the transportation plan, the MPO shall base the
update on the latest available estimates and assumptions for population, land use, travel, employment, congestion, and
economic activity. The MPO shall approve transportation plan contents and supporting analyses produced by a
transportation plan update. Regional
Overview
(f) The metropolitan transportation plan shall, at a minimum, include:
(1) The current and projected transportation demand of persons and goods in the metropolitan planning area over the
period of the transportation plan; Regional
Overview
(2) Existing and proposed transportation facilities (including major roadways, public transportation facilities, intercity
bus facilities, multimodal and intermodal facilities, nonmotorized transportation facilities (e.g., pedestrian walkways and
bicycle facilities), and intermodal connectors) that should function as an integrated metropolitan transportation system,
giving emphasis to those facilities that serve important national and regional transportation functions over the period of
the transportation plan.
The
Transportation
System
(3) A description of the performance measures and performance targets used in assessing the performance of the
transportation system in accordance with §450.306(d). Introduction
(4) A system performance report and subsequent updates evaluating the condition and performance of the
transportation system with respect to the performance targets described in §450.306(d), including—
Appendix -
System
Performance
(i) Progress achieved by the metropolitan planning organization in meeting the performance targets in comparison with
system performance recorded in previous reports, including baseline data; and
(ii) For metropolitan planning organizations that voluntarily elect to develop multiple scenarios, an analysis of how the
preferred scenario has improved the conditions and performance of the transportation system and how changes in local
policies and investments have impacted the costs necessary to achieve the identified performance targets.
DRAFT
§450.324 Development and content of the metropolitan transportation plan… continued Section
(5) Operational and management strategies to improve the performance of existing transportation facilities to relieve
vehicular congestion and maximize the safety and mobility of people and goods;
Appendix -
System
Performance
(6) Consideration of the results of the congestion management process in TMAs that meet the requirements of this
subpart, including the identification of SOV projects that result from a congestion management process in TMAs that are
nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide.
(7) Assessment of capital investment and other strategies to preserve the existing and projected future metropolitan
transportation infrastructure, provide for multimodal capacity increases based on regional priorities and needs, and
reduce the vulnerability of the existing transportation infrastructure to natural disasters. The metropolitan transportation
plan may consider projects and strategies that address areas or corridors where current or projected congestion
threatens the efficient functioning of key elements of the metropolitan area's transportation system.
The Vision
&
Implementation
(8) Transportation and transit enhancement activities, including consideration of the role that intercity buses may play in
reducing congestion, pollution, and energy consumption in a cost-effective manner and strategies and investments that
preserve and enhance intercity bus systems, including systems that are privately owned and operated, and including
transportation alternatives, as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101(a), and associated transit improvements, as described in 49
U.S.C. 5302(a), as appropriate;
Vision and Goals
&
Implementation
(9) Design concept and design scope descriptions of all existing and proposed transportation facilities in sufficient
detail, regardless of funding source, in nonattainment and maintenance areas for conformity determinations under the
EPA's transportation conformity regulations (40 CFR part 93, subpart A). In all areas (regardless of air quality
designation), all proposed improvements shall be described in sufficient detail to develop cost estimates;
Implementation
& Financial Plan
& TIP
(10) A discussion of types of potential environmental mitigation activities and potential areas to carry out these
activities, including activities that may have the greatest potential to restore and maintain the environmental functions
affected by the metropolitan transportation plan. The discussion may focus on policies, programs, or strategies, rather
than at the project level. The MPO shall develop the discussion in consultation with applicable Federal, State, and Tribal
land management, wildlife, and regulatory agencies. The MPO may establish reasonable timeframes for performing
this consultation;
Safety and
Environmental
Considerations
&
Implementation
(11) A financial plan that demonstrates how the adopted transportation plan can be implemented.
Financial Plan &
TIP
(i) For purposes of transportation system operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain system-level
estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and
maintain the Federal-aid highways (as defined by 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation (as defined by title
49 U.S.C. Chapter 53).
(ii) For the purpose of developing the metropolitan transportation plan, the MPO(s), public transportation operator(s),
and State shall cooperatively develop estimates of funds that will be available to support metropolitan transportation
plan implementation, as required under §450.314(a). All necessary financial resources from public and private sources
that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the transportation plan shall be identified.
(iii) The financial plan shall include recommendations on any additional financing strategies to fund projects and
programs included in the metropolitan transportation plan. In the case of new funding sources, strategies for ensuring
their availability shall be identified. The financial plan may include an assessment of the appropriateness of innovative
finance techniques (for example, tolling, pricing, bonding, public private partnerships, or other strategies) as revenue
sources for projects in the plan.
(iv) In developing the financial plan, the MPO shall take into account all projects and strategies proposed for funding
under title 23 U.S.C., title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or with other Federal funds; State assistance; local sources; and private
participation. Revenue and cost estimates that support the metropolitan transportation plan must use an inflation rate(s)
to reflect “year of expenditure dollars,” based on reasonable financial principles and information, developed
cooperatively by the MPO, State(s), and public transportation operator(s).
(v) For the outer years of the metropolitan transportation plan (i.e., beyond the first 10 years), the financial plan may
reflect aggregate cost ranges/cost bands, as long as the future funding source(s) is reasonably expected to be
available to support the projected cost ranges/cost bands.
(vi) For nonattainment and maintenance areas, the financial plan shall address the specific financial strategies required
to ensure the implementation of TCMs in the applicable SIP.
(vii) For illustrative purposes, the financial plan may include additional projects that would be included in the adopted
transportation plan if additional resources beyond those identified in the financial plan were to become available.
(viii) In cases that the FHWA and the FTA find a metropolitan transportation plan to be fiscally constrained and a
revenue source is subsequently removed or substantially reduced (i.e., by legislative or administrative actions), the
FHWA and the FTA will not withdraw the original determination of fiscal constraint; however, in such cases, the FHWA
and the FTA will not act on an updated or amended metropolitan transportation plan that does not reflect the changed
revenue situation.
DRAFT
Appendix G
Major Thoroughfare Plan 2020
The CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan is currently under development. It is anticipated that the plan will be
completed in early 2020 as identified in the FY2020 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
CAMPO currently depends on the County-Wide Transportation Study for Cole County and the Thoroughfare Plan
for Jefferson City to illustrate an adopted future road network. After completion and adoption of the CAMPO
2045 MTP staff will undertake the task of creating a Major Thoroughfare Plan for the CAMPO Region as a whole.
The CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan will provide an indication of the general locations and capacities needed to meet
the future needs of the CAMPO Region. The new plan will incorporate products from the Cole County and
Jefferson City plans as well as the completed Travel Demand Model and any other pertinent recommendations
from other local and regional plans.
The Plan will act as a guide for both municipalities and the private sector in making future decisions involving new
or existing roadways and will include future and current roadway functional classifications.
Ideally, the CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan will:
• Provide for the efficient movement of vehicular traffic into and throughout the Region.
• Identify the right-of-way needs to be dedicated to accommodate a proposed thoroughfare.
• Ensure adequate roadways to serve existing and proposed developments.
• Assist in identifying Capital Improvement Program needs
• Reduce the traffic volumes in residential areas by ensuring adequate arterials.
• Serve as a planning tool and assist coordination with other agencies.
The Thoroughfare Plan will be located in the Appendices once adopted by the CAMPO Board of Directors.
DRAFT
Appendix H
2015 CAMPO Wayfinding Plan
DRAFT
Appendix I
Amendments and Modifications
AMENDMENTS & MODIFICATIONS
The MTP is updated every five years. Between updates the MTP may be changed through an amendment or
administrative modification. An amendment to the MTP is subject to a 7-day public comment period after being
reviewed by the Technical Committee and before being approved by the Board of Directors. If staff conducts an
administrative modification, notice will be provided to the Board of Directors either prior to or immediately
following the modification. Appendix H contains a list of amendments and administrative modifications.
Definitions of an amendment or administrative modification, according to 23 CFR §450.104, are as follows:
Administrative modification means a minor revision to a long-range statewide or metropolitan
transportation plan, Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), or Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) that includes minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to funding
sources of previously included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation dates. An
administrative modification is a revision that does not require public review and comment, a
redemonstration of fiscal constraint, or a conformity determination (in nonattainment and maintenance
areas).
Amendment means a revision to a long-range statewide or metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, or STIP
that involves a major change to a project included in a metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, or STIP,
including the addition or deletion of a project or a major change in project cost, project/project phase
initiation dates, or a major change in design concept or design scope (e.g., changing project termini or the
number of through traffic lanes or changing the number of stations in the case of fixed guideway transit
projects). Changes to projects that are included only for illustrative purposes do not require an amendment.
An amendment is a revision that requires public review and comment and a redemonstration of fiscal
constraint. If an amendment involves “non-exempt” projects in nonattainment and maintenance areas, a
conformity determination is required.
No amendments or modifications have been made at this time.
Action Type
DRAFT
Appendix J
Surveys and Public Comments
DRAFT
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow
three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
CAMPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Development
May 2, 2019
Summary
A draft of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) is included with this memo and can
be found on the project website at www.campo2045.com. This memo provides a brief summary of the activities
undertaken to develop the MTP. Staff is requesting approval the draft MTP and a recommendation to the Board of
Directors.
Public Outreach
Two public meetings have been held (October 2018 and March 2019) as part of the MTP update process. The March
meeting was well attended with 20 attendees. An October 2018 public survey resulted in 92 responses and a report on
the survey results was given at to the Technical Committee and Board of Directors. A full report of the survey results
and other materials and documents relating to the planning process can be found at www.campo2045.com. Comments
continue to be accepted as part of the update process.
Scenarios and Travel Demand Model Development
Four land-use development scenarios were developed and after review by the public, staff, and stakeholders a “Trend”
scenario was chosen to use in the development of the Travel Demand Model (TDM). The Trend scenario estimates
that the region will grow and develop similarly to patterns seen over the previous 20-30 years in the region. The Trend
estimates an 18.5 % increase in population.
The TDM, which forecasts future traffic flows within the transportation system, used the Trend scenario to develop a
list of recommended improvements and future roads. These recommendations have been included in the MTP. The
TDM has been completed by consultants (HDR, Inc.) and is available for review at:
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/government/long_range_transportation_plan/plans_and_publications.php
Project and Strategies
A list of illustrative projects, goals, and strategies have been developed as part of the MTP update process and have
been reviewed by stakeholders, committee members, board members, and the general public. The strategies and
projects listed in the MTP also incorporate recommendations from other CAMPO plans.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval the draft MTP and forward the document to the Board of Directors.
Recommended Form of Motion: Motion to forward the Draft CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan
Transportation Plan to the Board of Directors for approval.
Agenda Item 6B
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Status of Current Work Tasks
May 2, 2019
Summary
The following list includes work tasks that are currently in progress or have been completed since the previous
Technical Committee meeting:
• CAMPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Update. Staff continues
development of the 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The data and public
engagement material from recent meetings may be found at www.campo2045.com. Please
see the attached staff report for more information.
• Travel Demand Model (TDM) Completion. The TDM has been completed and is
available for review at
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/government/long_range_transportation_plan/plans_and_p
ublications.php
• Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Staff has completed the 2020-2024 TIP
with an expected adoption date coinciding with adoption of the MTP. Please see the
attached staff report for more information.
• JEFFTRAN assistance. Staff continues development of a new route guide incorporating
new route changes.
• Federal Performance Measures. CAMPO staff continues collaborating with MODOT
staff concerning various federal performance measures required by MAP-21 and the
FAST Act.
• Taos Sewer Map. CAMPO staff will start working with the Village of Taos in Summer
2019 to update their sewer map.
• STIP update. CAMPO staff met with MoDOT and the other planning partners in the
Central District to discuss updates to the State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP).
Agenda Item 7A