Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout09.19.2017 City Council Meeting PacketMEDINA AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 19, 2017 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 Meeting Rules of Conduct: • Fill out and turn in white comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the September 5, 2017 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Final Pay Request to C & L Excavating, Inc. for Sioux Drive Turn Lane Improvement Project B. Approve Amended and Restated Contract for Fire Protection between the City of Maple Plain and the City of Medina C. Approve Warm-up Pitchers Area Installation Services Agreement D. Resolution Accepting Donation from the Hamel Athletic Club E. Resolution Accepting Public Utilities within the Just for Kix Development F. Resolution Approving Setback Variance from Right -of -Way for McDonald's at 822 Highway 55 G. Call for Special City Council Meeting on October 11, 2017 at 7:30 a.m. for the Fall Business Tours H. Call for Special City Council Meeting on November 8, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. to Discuss the Comprehensive Plan and Public Comments VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. PRESENTATION A. 2018 Preliminary Budget & Tax Levy 1. Resolution Approving Proposed Tax Levy for 2018 2. Resolution Approving Proposed General Fund Budget for 2018 3. Resolution Reducing Debt Service Tax Levies for 2018 4. Establish Public Discussion Date for Final 2018 Tax Levy and Budget VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Excelsior Group LLC - PUD Concept Plan Review — 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road IX. OLD BUSINESS A. Wally and Bridget Marx — Conservation Design Subdivision PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat — 2700-2900 Parkview Drive B. Medina Senior Living Community — Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Review 1. Ordinance Amending the Official Zoning Map to Rezone the Property Being Subdivided and Developed as the Medina Senior Living Community 2. Resolution Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance by Title and Summary 3. Resolution Granting Preliminary Plat Approval for a Subdivision to be Known as "Lunski-Nelson Addition" 4. Resolution Approving a Site Plan Review for the Medina Senior Living Community & Medical/Office Building C. Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition — Final Plat and Development Agreement 1. Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval for Reserve of Medina 2.nd Addition Posted 9/15/2017 Page 1 of 2 2. Development Agreement by and between the City of Medina and Toll MN, L.P. D. Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll for Deer Hill Preserve Road Improvement Project X. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT XI. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XIII. ADJOURN Posted 9/15/2017 Page 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: September 14, 2017 DATE OF MEETING: September 19, 2017 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Final Pay Request to C & L Excavating, Inc. for Sioux Drive Turn Lane Improvement Project — Approval of the final payment will close out the Sioux Drive project from 2016. Staff recommends approval. See attached pay request. B. Approve Amended and Restated Contract for Fire Protection between the City of Maple Plain and the City of Medina — Council Member Kathy Martin and staff worked with the City of Maple Plain on an updated two-year fire contract starting January 1, 2018. Only the dates of the contract were changed and all other contract provisions stayed consistent with the previous agreement. Staff recommends approval. See attached agreement. C. Approve Warm-up Pitchers Area Installation Services Agreement — The Hamel Athletic Club has requested to install two warm-up pitchers areas (bullpens) near the quad fields in Hamel Legion Park, which will be 100% funded by the Hamel Athletic Association. The Park Commission reviewed the request at their August 16th meeting and recommended approval. Staff confirmed the locations of the bullpens would not interfere with the fire lanes. Staff recommends approval. See attached agreement D. Resolution Accepting Donation from the Hamel Athletic Club — Staff recommends accepting the donation from the Hamel Athletic Club and using it to pay for the installation of the two warm-up pitchers areas as noted in the agenda item above. See attached resolution. E. Resolution Accepting Public Utilities within the Just for Kix Development — City Engineer Jim Stremel included the attached resolution accepting the public utilities for Just for Kix. Release of the letter of credit for the project is at the discretion of the City Engineer and requires receipt of the warranty bond for the project. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. F. Resolution Approving Setback Variance from Right -of -Way for McDonald's at 822 Highway 55 — Council reviewed this request at the September 5th meeting and directed staff to bring back the attached resolution for approval. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. G. Call for Special City Council Meeting on October 11, 2017 at 7:30 a.m. for the Fall Business Tours — Staff recommends calling for a special meeting on October 1 lth at 7:30 a.m. to conduct the annual fall business tours. No attachments for this item. H. Call for Special City Council Meeting on November 8, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. to Discuss the Comprehensive Plan and Public Comments — Staff recommends calling for a special meeting on November 8th to discuss the Steering Committees recommended changes and review comments regarding the draft Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends calling for a special meeting. No attachments for this item. VII. PRESENTATION A. 2018 Preliminary Budget & Tax Levy — Staff will provide a brief presentation on the proposed tax levy and general fund budget at the Regular Council meeting. A full presentation will be provided at the 6 PM Work Session. Attached is the proposed 2018 General Fund budget. See attached resolutions. Recommended Motion # 1: Adopt the resolution approving the 2018 preliminary tax levy. Recommended Motion # 2: Adopt the resolution approving the 2018 preliminary general fund budget. Recommended Motion # 3: Adopt the resolution reducing debt service tax levies for 2018. Recommended Motion # 4: Establish the 2018 final tax levy and budget discussion for December 5, 2017 at 7: 00 p.m. in City Hall. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Excelsior Group LLC - PUD Concept Plan Review — 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road — The Excelsior Group, LLC has requested review of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Plan for a 68-lot residential development north of Chippewa Road and west of Mohawk Drive. The subject site is a total of 37 acres (31.3 net acres). The subject site is 2 guided for Low Density Residential development in the current Comprehensive Plan within the 2021-2025 staging period. The Comprehensive Plan would permit a property to develop up to two years early through an incentive -based point system. As such, the property would not be permitted to be developed until 2019 under the existing Comprehensive Plan, even with the "jump ahead" provision. See attached report. IX. OLD BUSINESS A. Wally and Bridget Marx — Conservation Design Subdivision PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat — 2700-2900 Parkview Drive — Wally and Bridget Marx have requested review of a PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat for a Conservation Design subdivision at their property at 2700-2900 Parkview Drive. The applicant proposes to divide three lots totaling 89.75 acres into six single-family residential lots and proposes to place 69.61 (11.76 acres buildable) into conservation easements. See attached report. Potential Motion: If the City Council finds that the proposal meets the conservation objectives noted in the CD-PUD district to an extent justifying the flexibility requested, the following motion would be in order: Motion to direct staff to prepare documents granting PUD General Plan of Development and Preliminary Plat approval to Wally and Bridget Marx for the requested CD-PUD subdivision, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. B. Medina Senior Living Community — Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Review — At the August 15, 2017 City Council meeting, the Council reviewed a rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan from Lunski, Inc. for the Medina Senior Living Community project. Concerns were expressed regarding wetland impacts to allow for the construction of the building. Some Council members also questioned whether the proposed rezoning is appropriate at this time, prior to the Comprehensive Plan update being in effect. The Council requested that the applicant revise the plan to reduce the impacts to the wetlands and, on a 3-2 vote, directed Staff to bring back resolutions and an ordinance related to the approvals for the project. See attached report. Recommended Motion # 1: Move to adopt the ordinance to rezone the subject property to the Business zoning district. Recommended Motion # 2: Move to adopt the resolution authorizing publication of the ordinance by title and summary 3 Recommended Motion # 3: Move to approve the resolution granting preliminary plat approval subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. Recommended Motion # 4: Move to approve the resolution granting site plan review approval, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. C. Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition — Final Plat and Development Agreement — The subject property is located east of County Road 116 and south of Hackamore. Toll Brothers, the applicant, has now requested Final Plat approval for the 2nd addition of the development to include 44 single family lots. Streets and utilities are proposed to be constructed this fall for this phase, along with required tree planting from the initial site development. The 2nd addition is located in the southeast corner of the development. Future phases will extend north to Hackamore Road, but until that time, the additional 44 lots within the 2nd addition are proposed to access County Road 116 via Aster Road. See attached report. Recommended Motion # 1: Adopt resolution granting final plat approval for Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition Recommended Motion # 2: Approve Development Agreement by and between the City of Medina and Toll MN, L.P. for the Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition D. Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll for Deer Hill Preserve Road Improvement Project — In 2016, the City of Medina initiated a public improvement project consisting of constructing a road from %2 mile west of Willow Drive to Homestead Trail and a dedicated turn lane on Homestead Trail onto the newly constructed Deer Hill Road. The owners of the benefited land, Stonegate Farm, Inc. and Property Resources Development Corporation, petitioned for the construction of the improvement project and the special assessment of their respective properties for 100% of the cost. See attached resolution. Recommended Motion: Adopt resolution adopting assessment roll for Deer Hill Preserve road improvement project XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 004294E-004313E for $42,425.13, order check numbers 046323-046372 for $186, 710.33, and payroll EFT 0508133-0508163 for $49,080.74 and payroll manual check 0020437for $64.28. • Planning Depai liuent Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List 4 1 DRAFT 2 3 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 4 5 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on September 5, 2017 at 6 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Acting Mayor Pederson presided. 7 8 I. ROLL CALL 9 10 Members present: Anderson, Cousineau, Pederson, and Martin 11 12 Members absent: Mitchell. 13 14 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer 15 Jim Stremel, City Planner Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Chief 16 of Police Ed Belland. 17 18 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:00 p.m.) 19 20 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:00 p.m.) 21 Johnson noted that Commissioner Liz Weir from the Elm Creek Watershed Commission 22 is present to provide an update and suggested that occur as the first item under 23 comments. 24 25 Moved by Cousineau, seconded by Anderson, to approve the agenda as amended. 26 Motion passed unanimously. 27 28 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:01 p.m.) 29 30 A. Approval of the August 15, 2017 6:00 p.m. Special City Council Meeting 31 Minutes 32 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the August 15, 2017 6:00 p.m. 33 special City Council meeting minutes as presented. Motion passed unanimously. 34 35 B. Approval of the August 15, 2017 6:30 p.m. Special City Council Meeting 36 Minutes 37 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the August 15, 2017 6:30 p.m. 38 special City Council meeting minutes as presented. Motion passed unanimously. 39 40 C. Approval of the August 15, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 41 It was noted on page two, line five, it should state, "...is was..." On page two, line 43, it 42 should state, "...City's permitted hours. He stated that they Medina LP LLC wants..." 43 On page two, line 45, it should state, "...they the contractors..." On page three, line four, 44 it should state, "...asked if both men to could give their contact..." On page three, line 45 two, it should state, "...City permitted hours..." On page three, line eight, it should state, 46 "...so that the City does not have to cnforcc punishments take action to enforce the 47 ordinances." On page three, line 21, it should state, "...stipulations requirements of the 48 ordinances." On page three, line 24, it should state, "...their its trash..." It was noted 49 that mentions of the watershed should be changed to Watershed Commission. On page 50 three, line 43, it should state, "...Commissioners for the great job..." On page four, line 51 one, it should state, "...would take one of the newly created parcels..." On page four, Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 September 5, 2017 1 line 15, it should state, "...fen or..." On page four, line 36, it should state, "...in the 2 spelling of a word name on the Preliminary Plat, which staff confirmed will be cleared 3 up." On page four, line 39, it should state, "...this construction of the lot..." On page 4 five, line 36, it should state, "...first lowest..." On page five, line 44, it should state, 5 "...allowcd rcmoval allowance for tree removal..." On page five, line 46, it should state, 6 "...above and beyond the minimum requirements." On page five, line 51, it should state, 7 "...site although most of the demand is for the senior assisted living building." On page 8 five, line 21, it should state, "...in..." On page five, line 23, it should state, "...association} 9 that all three lots would be members of an association in which all three lots would be 10 members." On page five, line 38, it should state, "...they the applicant..." On page six, 11 line 15, it should state, "...does did..." On page six, line 33, it should state, "...she was 12 not seeing did not see..." On page six, line 34, it should state, "...measures as on the 13 plans, and it appears..." On page six, line two, it should state, "...parking noting that the 14 City ordinance currently does not have a formula for this type of use." On page eight, 15 line 17, it should state, "...October 4-St-h 17th." On page ten, line eight, it should state, 16 "...their its..." On page 12, line 20, it should state, "...run the pipe te-and-frem." 17 18 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the August 15, 2017 regular 19 City Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 20 21 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:11 p.m.) 22 23 A. Approve Right of Entry Agreement between the City of Medina and the 24 Wilfred J. Cavanaugh Family Limited Partnership 25 B. Approve Right of Entry Agreement between the City of Medina and Elaine 26 H. Roy, Trustee 27 C. Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for Medina Senior Housing 28 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 29 passed unanimously. 30 31 VI. COMMENTS (7:12 p.m.) 32 33 A. Update from Liz Weir on the Elm Creek Watershed Commission 34 Liz Weir provided an annual update on the Elm Creek Watershed Commission. She 35 provided background on the organization and its mission. She stated that the Third- 36 Generation Plan and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) has been approved and the 37 Commission has asked to make an amendment to the Third -Generation Plan. She 38 noted that both Champlin and Corcoran have recently taken over responsibility as their 39 own Local Government Units (LGUs), which has relieved the Commission of that 40 responsibility. She reviewed some of the restoration projects that the Commission is a 41 part of and the cost for participation. She stated that preventing pollution is much more 42 cost effective than cleaning up after the fact. She provided additional information on 43 weather trends. 44 45 Pederson thanked Commissioner Weir for her continued work as water will continue to 46 be an important issue for the community. 47 48 B. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 49 Ken Ferguson, 307 Cherry Hill Bay, stated that he was present to discuss the City's 50 policy on trash cans. He stated that for years he kept his trash cans outside, as his 51 neighbors do, but he then received a letter stating that he needed to put the trash cans Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 September 5, 2017 1 inside. He stated that he did comply and place his trash cans inside the garage. He 2 stated that 20 percent of the homes in his neighborhood are not in compliance with the 3 ordinance. He stated that he is okay with following the rules, but believed that everyone 4 then should be following the rules. He stated that he would like to see the ordinance 5 changed, noting that he placed his trash cans outside to prevent mice from coming 6 inside. 7 8 Pederson stated that the item can be placed on a worksession agenda for further 9 discussion. He agreed that about 20 percent of the homes in that neighborhood do not 10 comply with the ordinance. 11 12 Johnson stated that staff can alert Mr. Ferguson as to when the item will appear on the 13 worksession agenda. He provided more information on the timetable for review. 14 15 Mr. Ferguson stated that he would like to have an answer to see what can be done to 16 change the policy. He stated that he would like to be able to place his trash cans 17 outside to prevent the mice from coming inside. 18 19 Anderson asked if there is ample space for the trash cans to be placed in his garage. 20 21 Mr. Ferguson replied that they are only parking one vehicle in the garage now, which 22 leaves ample room, but explained that if there were two vehicles in the garage there 23 would not be adequate space. He noted that his main concern is with the rodents that 24 the trash attracts. 25 26 C. Park Commission 27 Scherer stated that the Park Commission discussed the Excelsior Concept Plan, the 28 Capital Improvement Plan and ball field lights, and considered baseball association 29 requests. 30 31 D. Planning Commission 32 Finke reported that the Planning Commission will meet the following week to hold five 33 public hearings. He stated that the Commission will consider the Weston Woods PUD 34 Concept Plan, the closed sanitary landfill zoning district and potential rezoning of 35 property to that new zoning district, a request from a property owner for the City to 36 amend the zoning code to allow additional ground mounted solar equipment, and a CUP 37 from the property owners at 2705 Willow Drive. 38 39 VII. NEW BUSINESS 40 41 A. McDonalds — Setback Variance for Trash Enclosure Replacement — 822 42 Highway 55 — Public Hearing (7:26 p.m.) 43 Finke presented a variance request to reduce the required setback for a trash enclosure 44 and storage building. He stated that Hennepin County is purchasing additional right-of- 45 way property for the CR 116 project and the proposed location would meet the required 46 setback, but for Hennepin County purchasing the additional right-of-way. He stated that 47 the remaining setbacks would be met. He noted that the trash enclosure and storage 48 building would be shifted slightly to the south from the previous location. He reviewed 49 the criteria which apply when an applicant requests a variance. He stated that the 50 Planning Commission reviewed the request at their meeting in August, determined that Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 September 5, 2017 1 the practical difficulties test was met and the use was reasonable and therefore 2 recommended unanimous approval. 3 4 Anderson referenced the property to the west and asked if that property is owned by 5 Hennepin County. 6 7 Finke identified the areas purchased by Hennepin County. He noted that the right-of- 8 way terminates half way down the tail and therefore that property would not be subject to 9 the right-of-way. He believed that the right-of-way would eventually be owned by the 10 City after the acquisition and project are complete. 11 12 Pederson opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. 13 14 Kendra Lindal, Landform, asked for approval of the variance. 15 16 Cousineau asked if landscaping will be done around the structure. 17 18 Ms. Lindal replied that they would be proposing nine new trees around the structure, 19 noting that staff will work with the applicant on the landscaping details. 20 21 Pederson closed the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. 22 23 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to direct staff to prepare a resolution 24 granting variance approval to McDonalds based upon the findings noted in the staff 25 report and subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. 26 Motion passed unanimously. 27 28 VIII. OLD BUSINESS 29 30 A. Personnel Policy Amendments (7:33 p.m.) 31 Johnson stated that Jodi Gallup worked closely with Martin to update the policy as 32 directed by the Council through the last worksession discussion. He expressed 33 appreciation for Gallup's time and excellent work. 34 35 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to approve the changes to the Personnel 36 Policy as presented. Motion passed unanimously. 37 38 IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (7:34 p.m.) 39 Johnson stated that staff is requesting the Council call for a special meeting on 40 September 19th for attorney client privilege discussion regarding ongoing litigation with 41 Ellis and Nancy Olkon. 42 43 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to call for a special City Council meeting on 44 September 19, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. for attorney client privilege discussion regarding 45 ongoing litigation. Motion passed unanimously. 46 47 Johnson reminded the Council that the budget open house will also occur on September 48 19th at 6:00 p.m. He stated that the water tower rehab project started today. 49 50 Scherer reported that the first day of the project went well. He stated that they drained 51 the tower and there was an excessive amount of sediment that will need to be removed. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 September 5, 2017 1 He provided information on backup connections that have been made and will be made 2 soon. 3 4 Johnson noted that Fred Webber has submitted comments on the recent CR 101 speed 5 study results that Johnson will be sharing with the Council members and Hennepin 6 County. 7 8 X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (7:37 p.m.) 9 Cousineau noted that Medina Celebration Day will occur on September 16tn 10 11 XI. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (7:37 p.m.) 12 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to approve the bills, EFT 004276E-004293E 13 for $65, 037.93, order check numbers 046254-046322 for $163, 003.28, and payroll EFT 14 0508106-0508132 for $47, 081.60. Motion passed unanimously. 15 16 XII. ADJOURN 17 Moved by Cousineau, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at 7:38 p.m. 18 Motion passed unanimously. 19 20 21 22 23 24 Jeff Pederson, Acting Mayor 25 Attest: 26 27 28 Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 September 5, 2017 Approved By County/City/Project Engineer May 3, 2017 Date ?-3/ Date WSB CITY OF MEDINA 2052 County Rd 24 Medina, MN 55340 Project 02712-61 - MDNA - Sioux Drive Turn Lane Improvement Project Final Pay Voucher No. 3 Contractor: C & L Excavating, Inc. 7939 Ridgewood Road St. Joseph, MN 56374 Contract Amounts Original Contract Contract Changes Revised Contract Work Certified To Date $136,501.61 $60, 560.60 $197, 062.21 Base Bid Items Backsheet Change Order Supplemental Agreement Work Order Material On Hand Total $131,661.13 $0.00 $52,488.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $184,149.25 Contract No. Vendor No. For Period: Warrant # 8/31 /2016 - 5/3/2017 Date Funds Encumbered Original Additional Total $136,501.61 N/A $136,501.61 Work Certified This Pay Voucher Work Certified To Date Less Amount Retained Less Previous Payments Amount Paid This Pay Voucher Total Amount Paid To Date 02712-61 $54,011.00 $184,149,25 $0.00 $123,631.34 $60,517.91 $184,149.25 Percent Retained: 0% Amount Paid This Final Pay Voucher $60,517.91 I hereby certify that a Final Examination has been made of the noted Contract, that the Contract has been completed, that the entire amount of Work Shown in this Final Voucher has been performed d the Total Value of the Work Performed in accordance with, and pursuant to, the terms of the Contract is s s own in this Final Voucher. Apprd cc L xcavating, Inc. Con rr for Date Page 1 CITY OF MEDINA 2052 County Rd 24 Medina, MN 55340 Project No. 02712-61 Final Pay Voucher No. 3 02712-61 Payment Summary No. From Date To Date Work Certified Amount Retained Amount Paid F'er Pay Voucher Per Pay Voucher Per Pay Voucher 1 06/01/2016 07/14/2016 $103,891.35 $5,194.57 S98,696.78 2 07/15/2016 08/30/2016 $26,246.90 $1,312.34 $24,934.56 3 08/31/2016 05/03/2017 $54,011.00 ($6,506.91) $60,517.91 Totals: $184,149.25 $0.00 $184,149.25 02712-61 Funding Category Report Funding Work Less Less Amount Paid Total Category Certified Amount Previous This Amount Paid No. To Date Retained Payments Pay Voucher To Date UNF 184,149.25 0 00 123,631.34 60,517.91 184,149.25 Totals: $184,149.25 $0.00 $123,631.34 $60,517.91 $184,149.25 02712-61 Funding Source Report Accounting Funding No. Source Amount Paid Revised Funds Paid To This Contract Encumbered Contractor Pay Voucher Amount To Date To Date UNF Unfunded 60,517.91 197,062.21 136,501.61 184,149.25 Totals: $60,517.91 $197,062.21 $136,501.61 $184,149.25 Pace 2 CITY OF MEDINA 2052 County Rd 24 Medina, MN 55340 Project No. 02712-61 Final Pa v Voucher No. 3 02712-61 Project Material Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Pay Voucher Amount This Pay Voucher Quantity To Date Amount To Date SCHEDULE A. STREET & STORM IMPROVEMENTS 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS $6,200.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $6,200.00 2 2102'501 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL S F $2.50 472 0 $0.00 96 $240.00 3 2102'502 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL L F $0.85 540 0 $0.00 601 $510.85 4 2104'501 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER L F $4.25 830 0 $0.00 700 $2,975.00 5 2104'503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F $1.50 1250 0 $0.00 940 $1.410.00 6 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y $5.75 230 0 $0.00 230 $1,322.50 7 2104'505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $7.40 150 0 $0.00 165 $1,221.00 8 2104'509 REMOVE CATCH BASIN EACH $550.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $550.00 9 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH $50.00 5 0 $0.00 5 $250.00 10 2104'509 REMOVE SIGN PANEL TYPE C EACH $50.00 5 0 $0.00 5 $250.00 11 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F $10.00 20 0 $0.00 20 $200.00 12 2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F $3.50 910 0 $0.00 910 $3,185.00 13 2104'523 SALVAGE HYDRANT & VALVE EACH $3,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $3,000.00 14 2104'523 SALVAGE AND INSTALL SIGN EACH $180.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $360.00 15 2104'602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAIL BOX EACH $200.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $200.00 16 2105'501 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) (P) CU YD $45.00 300 0 $0.00 300 $13,500.00 17 2105'522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) C Y $16.50 220 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 18 2105.601 DEWATERING LS $0.01 1 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 19 2105'604 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y $3.50 550 0 $0.00 353 $1.235.50 20 2105.607 1 1/2" CLEAR ROCK CU YD $40.00 20 0 $0.00 15 $600.00 21 2112'501 SUBGRADE PREPAR PREPARATION RDST $450.00 4 0 $0.00 4 $1,800.00 22 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR $125.00 20 0 $0.00 9 $1,125.00 23 2130.501 WATER (DUST CONTROL) M GALLONS $40.00 20 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Page 3 CITY OF MEDINA 2052 County Rd 24 Medina, MN 55340 Project No. 02712-61 Final Pay Voucher No. 3 02712-61 Project Material Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Pay Voucher Amount This Pay Voucher Quantity To Date Amount To Date 24 2211'501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON $20.00 330 0 $0.00 338.77 $6,775.40 25 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $3.70 20 20 $74.00 45 $166.50 26 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,B) TON $131.00 50 0 $0.00 58.35 $7,643.85 27 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,B) TON $145.00 90 0 $0.00 117.92 $17,098.40 28 2360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B), 3.0" THICK S Y $25.00 100 0 $0.00 165 $4,125.00 29 2503'541 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F $75.00 20 0 $0.00 10 $750.00 30 2503.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $975.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $975.00 31 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH $1,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,500.00 32 2504'602 INSTALL HYDRANT & VALVE EACH $1,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,500.00 33 2504'602 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $300.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $300.00 34 2504'603 6" WA DUCTILE LE IRON CL 52 N IRO L F $57.00 10 0 $0.00 10 $570.00 35 2505'601 UTILITY COORDINATION LUMP SUM $500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $500.00 36 2506'516 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM) EACH $650.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $1.300.00 37 2506'602 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 EACH $2,750.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $2,750.00 38 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK S F $6.00 1230 60 $360.00 1000 $6,000.00 39 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F $18.50 720 50 $925.00 770 $14.245.00 40 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $9,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $9.000.00 41 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F $29.00 110.69 0 $0.00 110.69 $3,210.01 42 2564.602 SIGN POST SUPPORT EACH $125.00 8 0 $0.00 8 $1.000.00 43 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE HI L F $3.00 200 0 $0.00 160 $480.00 44 2573'530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH $200.00 6 0 $0.00 6 $1,200.00 45 2575.540 FILTER LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER BIOROLL LIN FT $4.40 100 0 $0.00 60 $264.00 46 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 LB $1.00 40 0 $0.00 40 $40.00 Page 4 CITY OF MEDINA 2052 County Rd 24 Medina, MN 55340 Project No. 02712-61 Final Pay Voucher No. 3 02712-61 Project Material Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Pay Voucher Amount This Pay Voucher Quantity To Date Amount To Date 47 2574'525 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW C Y $34.00 80 2 $68.00 38 $1,292.00 48 2575.501 SEEDING ACRE $1,500.00 0.1 0 $0.00 0.1 $150.00 49 2575'502 12 SEED MIXTURE 25- LB $7.00 10 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 50 2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL & FERT.) SQ YD $6.00 360 0 $0.00 250 $1,500.00 51 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY S Y $2.00 360 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 52 2575'535 WATER (TURF ESTABLISHMENT) MGAL $100.00 20 0 $0.00 17 $1,700.00 53 2582.501 PAVT MSSG EPDXY S F $8.00 183.48 0 $0.00 183.48 $1,467.84 54 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE EPDXY L F $0.55 215 0 $0.00 530 $291.50 55 2582.502 8" SOLID LINE EPDXY L F $1.10 50 0 $0.00 64 $70.40 56 2582'502 EPDXY DOTTED LINE E L F $0.55 50 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 57 2582'502 4" DBLE SOLID LINE EPDXY L F $1.25 400 0 $0.00 1184 $1,480.00 58 2564'603 24" SOLID LINE WHITE -EPDXY LIN FT $14.75 40 6.5 $95.88 40.5 $597.38 59 2582.503 CROSSWALK EPDXY S F $8.00 180 0 $0.00 198 $1,584.00 Totals For Section SCHEDULE A. STREET & STORM IMPROVEMENTS: $1,522.88 $131,661.13 Change Order 1 60 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS $6,200.00 1 1 $6,200.00 1 $6,200.00 61 2104'501 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER L F $4.25 160 95 $403.75 95 $403.75 62 2104'503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F $1.50 420 475 $712.50 475 $712.50 63 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y $5.75 310 307 $1,765.25 307 $1,765.25 64 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F $10.00 10 10 $100.00 10 $100.00 65 2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F $3.50 300 242 $847.00 242 $847.00 66 2104'523 SALVAGE AND INSTALL SIGN EACH $180.00 1 1 $180.00 1 $180.00 67 2105'501 COMMON EXCAVATION C Y $45.00 180 72 $3,240.00 72 $3,240.00 68 2105'604 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y $3.50 300 307 $1,074.50 307 $1,074.50 69 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON $20.00 240 64.4 $1,288.00 64.4 $1.288.00 BITUMINOUS Page 5 CITY OF MEDINA 2052 County Rd 24 Medina, MN 55340 Project No. 02712-61 Final Pay Voucher No. 3 02712-61 Project Material Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Pay Voucher Amount This Pay Voucher Quantity To Date Amount To Date 70 2357.502 MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $3.70 38 80 $296.00 80 $296.00 70 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (EDGE) S Y $50.00 55 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 71 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,B) TON $131.00 65 95.28 $12,481.68 95.28 $12,481.68 72 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,B) TON $145.00 80 55.7 $8,076.50 55.7 $8,076.50 73 2504'602 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $300.00 1 1 $300.00 1 $300.00 74 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK S F $6.00 420 475 $2,850.00 475 $2,850.00 75 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F $45.65 90 95 $4.336.75 95 $4,336.75 76 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL STAGE 1 LUMP SUM $2,050.00 1 2.26585 $4,644.99 2.26585 $4.644.99 77 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL STAGE 2 LUMP SUM $2,950.00 1 1 $2,950.00 1 $2,950.00 78 2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL & FERT.) SQ YD $6.00 60 60 $360.00 60 $360.00 79 2575.535 WATER (TURF ESTABLISHMENT) MGAL $100.00 4 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 80 2582.501 PAVT MSSG EPDXY S F $8.00 15 15 $120.00 15 $120.00 81 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE EPDXY L F $0.55 110 195 $107.25 195 $107.25 82 2582.502 4" DOTTED LINE EPDXY L F $0.55 70 14 $7.70 14 $7.70 83 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE - EPDXY LIN FT $1.25 60 117 $146.25 117 $146.25 Totals For Change Order 1: $52,488.12 $52,488.12 Project Totals: $54,011.00 $184,149.25 02712-61 Contract Changes No. Type Date Explanation Estimated Amount Amount Paid To Date CO1 Change Order 11/29/2016 Change Order No. 1 (see change order document for detailed description) $60,560.60 $52,488.12 Contract Change Totals: $60,560.60 $52,488.12 Page 6 AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR FIRE PROTECTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN AND THE CITY OF MEDINA THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT, effective , January 1 , 2018, by and between the City of Maple Plain, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Maple Plain"), and the City of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Medina"); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Maple Plain has the capability to provide fire protection and emergency medical and rescue services to Medina through the personnel, facilities, and equipment of its Maple Plain Volunteer Fire Department; and WHEREAS, Medina desires to contract with Maple Plain to provide such services to a portion of Medina, subject to the terms hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the other mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: DEFINITIONS 1.01 Fire Protection Services. The protection of life and property from damage or destruction by fire, together with such emergency medical and rescue operations as may be authorized by Maple Plain, acting through its duly appointed Fire Chief or designee. 1.02 Fire Protection Services Area. The land area in Medina described in Exhibit A attached hereto to which Maple Plain shall provide Fire Protection Services during the term of this Contract. 1.03 Service Fee. The amount of consideration payable annually by Medina to Maple Plain for Fire Protection Services. 1 1.04 Call Hour — is the time from when the call is dispatched to the time the last truck is out of service. If the call is less than an hour in length, it is counted as a one hour call. FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED 2.01 In accordance with the terms and conditions hereof, Maple Plain shall provide Fire Protection Services within the Fire Protection Services Area or shall arrange for such services to be provided pursuant to mutual aid. For each call, the Fire Chief shall dispatch such fire fighting personnel and equipment or emergency personnel and equipment as the Chief determines to be necessary. The Fire Chief may also call for such other assistance under any mutual aid agreement as the Chief may deem necessary. 2.02 Maple Plain agrees to keep and maintain in good order and at its expense the fire and emergency equipment necessary to provide Fire Protection Services. Maple Plain shall also arrange for suitable personnel to provide Fire Protection Services. 2.03 Maple Plain shall provide to Medina an Annual Fire Services Report to include a recent five-year history of fire calls (and hours) in the service area, a recent three-year history of the Maple Plain line -item budget of all actual revenues and expenditures, a current list of all fixed assets and equipment, a 10-year Capital Improvement Plan, and any other information that Maple Plain deems appropriate. ANNUAL CONSIDERATION 3.01 In consideration of rendition of Fire Protection Services to the Fire Protection Services Area under this Contract, Medina shall pay to Maple Plain an annual Base Compensation Service Fee, without further notice, in two equal semi-annual installments payable on March 15 and September 15; and, an Hourly Rate Compensation Service Fee, payable within 30 days upon Medina receipt of an annual call hour report from Maple Plain as follows: 2 2018 • Base Compensation: An annual amount equal to $5,557.82 plus the 2017 annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) percent increase for the Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro area as published by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, but not less than a 2% increase and not to exceed a 5% increase; plus, • Hourly Rate Compensation: An hourly rate equal to $160.00 for each call hour serviced in Medina by Maple Plain which exceeds 100 call hours in each calendar year. 2019 • Base Compensation: An annual amount equal to the 2018 Base Compensation plus the 2018 annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) percent increase for the Minneapolis -St. Paul Metro area as published by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, but not less than a 2% increase and not to exceed a 5% increase; plus, • Hourly Rate Compensation: An hourly rate equal to $160.00 for each call hour serviced in Medina by Maple Plain which exceeds 100 call hours in each calendar year. TERM AND TERMINATION 4.01 This Agreement covers the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019. The term of this agreement will be extended for a period of two years unless this Agreement is terminated as provided in Section 4.02 of the Agreement. 3 4.02 This Agreement shall be terminable only as follows: 1. Medina or Maple Plain may choose to terminate its participation in the Agreement provided that such termination be effective on January 1 of the subsequent year preceded by a minimum six- month written notice. 2. Immediate termination may occur for breach of contract following written notice; MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 5.01 Calls for Fire Protection Services shall generally be answered in the order of their receipt. In case of concurrent fires or calls for emergency medical or rescue services, either within the several areas served by Maple Plain or under any mutual aid agreement, the Fire Chief shall weigh the relative risk of loss to life and property posed by the concurrent calls and shall make a final determination on the advisability of committing equipment and fire fighters to the concurrent calls. In making this determination, and in making the same determination in the case of single fires, the Fire Chief shall also consider the feasibility of making the run in light of road conditions, weather conditions and all other conditions which shall affect the safety of fire fighters and equipment. 502 Neither Maple Plain nor the Maple Plain Volunteer Fire Department shall have any claim against Medina for damage to their property or equipment. Maple Plain shall indemnify and hold Medina, its officers, employees, agents and representatives harmless for all claims arising out of injuries or death to fire fighters or others or for damage to property occurring in the provision of Fire Protection Services. Maple Plain agrees to obtain at its expense such public liability or other insurance as it deems necessary in an amount no less than $1,000,000 protecting itself and Medina against damage claims of its fire fighters for personal injury sustained while in service within the said limits of the Fire Service Area as hereto set forth. Nothing in this Contract shall be deemed to be a waiver of any limitation of public liability available to Maple 4 Plain under state law. 5.03 At no time shall Medina have any claim on any assets of the City of Maple Plain, the Maple Plain Volunteer Fire Department, or any joint powers or mutual aid agreements to which Maple Plain may be a party. 5.04 By adoption of a resolution authorizing Maple Plain to enter into this Contract, Maple Plain also has authorized the Maple Plain Volunteer Fire Department to respond to fires or calls for other emergency medical or rescue services outside the city limits of Maple Plain in the manner contemplated by Minn. Statutes, Secs. 438.08 through 438.11, inclusive. 5.05 This Contract shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any other written or oral agreement between Maple Plain and Medina. This Contract may only be modified in writing signed by both parties. 5.06 This Contract may be assigned by Maple Plain to a joint powers entity established by Maple Plain and the City of Independence for the purpose of providing Fire Protection Services within those cities. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands effective at the date first above written. THE CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN THE CITY OF MEDINA By: ayor Julie Maas-Kusske By: Mayor Bob Mitchell City Administrator City Administrator Scott Johnson Robert Schoen STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 5 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _day of , 2017 by Bob Mitchell and Scott Johnson, the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively, of the City of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 4)17 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �% day of •21J<9by Julie Maas- Kusske and Bobby Schoen, the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively, of the ity of Maple Plain, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the City. Q1LOY1 Notary Public SHARON CELESTE SPICER Notary Public -Minnesota '•My Commission Pamirs. Jan 31, 2021 6 AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT FOR FIRE PROTECTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN AND THE CITY OF MEDINA THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRACT, effective , January 'August , 20185, by and between the City of Maple Plain, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Maple Plain"), and the City of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Medina"); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Maple Plain has the capability to provide fire protection and emergency medical and rescue services to Medina through the personnel, facilities, and equipment of its Maple Plain Volunteer Fire Department; and WHEREAS, Medina desires to contract with Maple Plain to provide such services to a portion of Medina, subject to the terms hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the other mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: DEFINITIONS 1.01 Fire Protection Services. The protection of life and property from damage or destruction by fire, together with such emergency medical and rescue operations as may be authorized by Maple Plain, acting through its duly appointed Fire Chief or designee. 1.02 Fire Protection Services Area. The land area in Medina described in Exhibit A attached hereto to which Maple Plain shall provide Fire Protection Services during the term of this Contract. 1.03 Service Fee. The amount of consideration payable annually by Medina to Maple Plain for Fire Protection Services. 1 1.04 Call Hour — is the time from when the call is dispatched to the time the last truck is out of service. If the call is less than an hour in length, it is counted as a one hour call. FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED 2.01 In accordance with the terms and conditions hereof, Maple Plain shall provide Fire Protection Services within the Fire Protection Services Area or shall arrange for such services to be provided pursuant to mutual aid. For each call, the Fire Chief shall dispatch such fire fighting personnel and equipment or emergency personnel and equipment as the Chief determines to be necessary. The Fire Chief may also call for such other assistance under any mutual aid agreement as the Chief may deem necessary. 2.02 Maple Plain agrees to keep and maintain in good order and at its expense the fire and emergency equipment necessary to provide Fire Protection Services. Maple Plain shall also arrange for suitable personnel to provide Fire Protection Services. 2.03 Maple Plain shall provide to Medina an Annual Fire Services Report to include a recent five-year history of fire calls (and hours) in the service area, a recent three-year history of the Maple Plain line -item budget of all actual revenues and expenditures, a current list of all fixed assets and equipment, a 10-year Capital Improvement Plan, and any other information that Maple Plain deems appropriate. ANNUAL CONSIDERATION 3.01 In consideration of rendition of Fire Protection Services to the Fire Protection Services Area under this Contract, Medina shall pay to Maple Plain an annual Base Compensation Service Fee, without further notice, in two equal semi-annual installments payable on March 15 and September 15; and, an Hourly Rate Compensation Service Fee, payable within 30 days upon Medina receipt of an annual call hour report from Maple Plain as follows: 2 20186 • Base Compensation: An annual amount equal to $5,557.82 $5,342p1us the 20176 annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) percent increase for the Minneapolis -St. Paul Metro area as published by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, but not less than a 2% increase and not to exceed a 5% increase; plus, • Hourly Rate Compensation: An hourly rate equal to $1640.00_for each call hour serviced in Medina by Maple Plain which exceeds 100 call hours in each calendar year. 20197 • Base Compensation: An annual amount equal to the 20186 Base Compensation plus the 20186 annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) percent increase for the Minneapolis -St. Paul Metro area as published by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, but not less than a 2% increase and not to exceed a 5% increase; plus, • Hourly Rate Compensation: An hourly rate equal to $160.00for each call hour serviced in Medina by Maple Plain which exceeds 100 call hours in each calendar year. TERM AND TERMINATION 4.01 This Agreement covers the period January 1, 20186 through December 31, 20197. The term of this agreement will be extended for a period of two years unless this Agreement is terminated as provided in Section 4.02 of the Agreement. 3 4.02 This Agreement shall be terminable only as follows: 1. Medina or Maple Plain may choose to terminate its participation in the Agreement provided that such termination be effective on January 1 of the subsequent year preceded by a minimum six- month written notice. 2. Immediate termination may occur for breach of contract following written notice; MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 5.01 Calls for Fire Protection Services shall generally be answered in the order of their receipt. In case of concurrent fires or calls for emergency medical or rescue services, either within the several areas served by Maple Plain or under any mutual aid agreement, the Fire Chief shall weigh the relative risk of loss to life and property posed by the concurrent calls and shall make a final determination on the advisability of committing equipment and fire fighters to the concurrent calls. In making this determination, and in making the same determination in the case of single fires, the Fire Chief shall also consider the feasibility of making the run in light of road conditions, weather conditions and all other conditions which shall affect the safety of fire fighters and equipment. 5.02 Neither Maple Plain nor the Maple Plain Volunteer Fire Department shall have any claim against Medina for damage to their property or equipment. Maple Plain shall indemnify and hold Medina, its officers, employees, agents and representatives harmless for all claims arising out of injuries or death to fire fighters or others or for damage to property occurring in the provision of Fire Protection Services. Maple Plain agrees to obtain at its expense such public liability or other insurance as it deems necessary in an amount no less than $1,000,000 protecting itself and Medina against damage claims of its fire fighters for personal injury sustained while in service within the said limits of the Fire Service Area as hereto set forth. Nothing in this Contract shall be deemed to be a waiver of any limitation of public liability available to Maple 4 Plain under state law. 5.03 At no time shall Medina have any claim on any assets of the City of Maple Plain, the Maple Plain Volunteer Fire Department, or any joint powers or mutual aid agreements to which Maple Plain may be a party. 5.04 By adoption of a resolution authorizing Maple Plain to enter into this Contract, Maple Plain also has authorized the Maple Plain Volunteer Fire Department to respond to fires or calls for other emergency medical or rescue services outside the city limits of Maple Plain in the manner contemplated by Minn. Statutes, Secs. 438.08 through 438.11, inclusive. 5.05 This Contract shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any other written or oral agreement between Maple Plain and Medina. This Contract may only be modified in writing signed by both parties. 5.06 This Contract may be assigned by Maple Plain to a joint powers entity established by Maple Plain and the City of Independence for the purpose of providing Fire Protection Services within those cities. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands effective at the date first above written. THE CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN THE CITY OF MEDINA By: By: Mayor Julie Maas-KusskeJerry Young Mayor Bob Mitchell City Administrator City Administrator Bobby SchoenTessia Melvin Scott Johnson STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 5 i The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20175 by Bob Mitchell and Scott Johnson, the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively, of the City of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2015 by Julie Maas- KusskeJerry Young and Bobby SchoenTessia Melvin, the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively, of the City of Maple Plain, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the City. Notary Public 6 Agenda Item # 5C WARM-UP PITCHERS AREAS INSTALLATION SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this 19th day of September 2017, by and between Sam's Lawn Landscaping & Property Maintenance, P.O. Box 848, Wayzata, MN 55391, a Minnesota corporation (the "Contractor") and the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"). Recitals 1. The City has been authorized to enter into a contract for warm-up pitchers areas installation services; and 2. The City has approved the contract for warm-up pitchers areas installation services with the Contractor; and 3. The parties wish to define the scope of services and terms of their agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Contractor agree as follows: Terms 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. The Contractor will perform warm-up pitchers areas installation services for the City in Hamel Legion Park in the location identified on Exhibit A. "Warm-up pitchers areas installation services" will consist of the mobilization of the Contractor's equipment, project layout, sub cut two areas for installation of 8 inch ball field lime, install 8 inch ball field lime in the two areas, install four bury type home plates, install two pitcher's mounds per Little League regulation, install four adult 4-way pitcher's rubbers, export excess soils, and install four mesh net backstops with sleeves installed for removal during non-use as shown and detailed on Exhibit B. 2.0. TERM. The term and prices of this contract shall remain in effect from September 19, 2017 until December 1, 2017, or until such later date as may be mutually agreed upon. 3.0 COMPENSATION. The City shall compensate the Contractor upon completion of the work and submitting an invoice for services. The City shall compensate the Contractor a total of $5,920 to furnish material and labor to complete the warm-up pitchers areas installation services as shown on Exhibit B. 3.01 The Contractor shall pay for all licenses and permits. These costs shall be included in the bid cost. The City is exempt from sales tax. 4.0 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 4.01 Both the Contractor and the City acknowledge and agree that the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Any employee or subcontractor who may perform services for the Contractor in connection with this Agreement is also not an employee of the City. The Contractor understands that the City will not provide any benefits of any type in connection with this Agreement, including but not limited to health or medical insurance, worker's compensation insurance and 1 unemployment insurance, nor will the City withhold any state or federal taxes, including income or payroll taxes, which may be payable by the Contractor. 4.02 The Contractor will supply and use its own equipment and tools to complete the services under this Agreement. 4.03 The Contractor acknowledges that any general instruction it receives from the City has no effect on its status as an independent contractor. 4.04 The Contractor will be responsible to coordinate all utility locations, private and public, on the site before excavation begins. 5.0 INSURANCE. The Contractor will maintain adequate insurance to protect itself and the City from claims and liability for injury or damage to persons or property for all work performed by the Contractor and its respective employees or agents under this Agreement. The Contractor shall name the City as an additional insured under its commercial general liability policy in limits acceptable to the City. Prior to performing any services under this Agreement, the Contractor shall provide evidence to the City that acceptable insurance coverage is effective. 6.0 WORKER'S COMPENSATION. 6.01 The Contractor will comply with the provisions of the Minnesota worker's compensation statute as an independent contractor before commencing work under this Agreement. 6.02 The Contractor will provide its own worker's compensation insurance and will provide evidence to the City of such coverage before commencing work under this Agreement. 7.0 INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor will hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including defense, settlement, and reasonable attorney's fees) for claims as a result of bodily injury, loss of life, property damages and any other damages arising out of the Contractor's performance under this Agreement. 8.0 APPLICABLE LAW. The execution, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement will, in all respects, be controlled and governed by the laws of Minnesota. 9.0 ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor may not assign this Agreement or procure the services of another individual or company to provide services under this Agreement without first obtaining the express written consent of the City. 10.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties, and no other agreement prior to or contemporaneous with this Agreement shall be effective, except as expressly set forth or incorporated herein. Any purported amendment to this Agreement is not effective unless it is in writing and executed by both parties. 2 11.0 NO WAIVER BY CITY. By entering into this Agreement, the City does not waive its entitlement to any immunity under statute or common law. 12.0 TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time, for any reason. If the contract is terminated early, the City will pay a prorated fee for the services performed to date in that calendar year. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. CITY OF MEDINA By Bob Mitchell, Mayor By Scott Johnson, City Administrator SAM'S LAWN LANDSCAPING & PROPERTY MAINTENANCE (CONTRACTOR) By Print Name: 3 Hamel Legion Park Home to Hamel Basebal Legend I ri Parking No Parking Indoor Bathrooms ill Port -a -Potty MHandicapAccessible Port -a -Pot ty 1 147 N.€ arkinglislylowedanEthelliamel Copal ' nity[ll ildingWarkingaot Rik 'iIll 1■111 la711111111111 Exhibit B Landscaping propertyanteance P.O. Box 848 Wayzata, MN 55391 Office 763-478-0200 Fax 763-478-0300 www.samslandscape.com Project Quote Date: 0/22/2017 Project: Hamel Baseball Association: Warm Up Pitchers Areas Submitted To: Andy c/o: Hamel Baseball Association Addenda: Inclusions: We have included the following items in our quote, 1: Mobilization of our equipment 2: Layout of project 3: Subcut 2 areas for installation of 8" ballfield lime 4: Install 8" Ballfield Lime, compacted 5: Install 4 bury type Home Plates 6: Install 2 pitcher's mounds, Little league regulation 7: Install 4 Adult: 4-way pitcher's rubbers 8: Export excess soils 9: Install 4 mesh net backstops: sleeves installed for removal during non-use Total Bid: $5,920.00 Notes: 1: Above pricing includes all applicable taxes. Pricing good for 30 days. Ben Vandeputte Project Manager / Estimator -_ F'I�T+aj_ H, '"fir ■ Agenda Item # 5D Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2017- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM HAMEL ATHLETIC CLUB WHEREAS, The Hamel Athletic Club has generously offered to donate a check in the amount of $5,920 (the "Donation") to the city of Medina (the "City"); and WHEREAS, the Donation will be dedicated to the City's Municipal Park Fund to install two warm-up pitcher areas in Hamel Legion Park; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to accept the Donation and express its gratitude to the Hamel Athletic Club for their generosity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, that the City accepts the Donation and thanks the Hamel Athletic Club. Dated: September 19, 2017. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017- September 19, 2017 Agenda Item # 5E Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 2017-## RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC UTILITIES WITHIN THE JUST FOR KIX DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Clough Properties, LLC (the "Developer") is constructing improvements within the platted development known as Just for Kix for the purpose of constructing a multi - tenant commercial building; and WHEREAS, the Developer and the City have previously entered into an agreement dated August 5, 2016 (the "Development Agreement") related to the development of the Subdivision; and WHEREAS, consistent with the terms of the Agreement, the Developer has completed construction of parking and access drives, watermain, and stormwater infrastructure improvements (the "Improvements"), to serve the units within the Development; and WHEREAS, the city engineer has inspected the Improvements and determined that they have been constructed in accordance with the plans incorporated in the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, as required by the Development Agreement, the Developer or the Developer's contractor will be required to submit a warranty bond regarding repair or replacement of any defects in the Improvements for one year from the date of this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City hereby accepts the Improvements as public improvements and shall maintain them, except as provided for herein. 2. The Developer shall remain responsible to repair or replace defective portions of the Improvements if they show signs of failure for one year from the date of this resolution, normal wear and tear excepted. 3. If the Developer shall fail to repair or replace defective portions of the Improvements as required herein and pursuant to the Development Agreement, the City shall utilize the warranty bond for such purpose. Resolution No. 2017-## September 19, 2017 4. Upon receipt of the warranty bond and at the discretion of the City Engineer, the City authorizes the release of the letter of credit for the Subdivision Improvements. 5. The terms and conditions of the letter from the city engineer dated September 13, 2017 attached hereto as Exhibit A are hereby incorporated into this resolution and made a part hereof. 6. City staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take all steps necessary or convenient to carry out the intent and purpose of this resolution. Dated: September 19, 2017. By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: By: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017-## 2 September 19, 2017 Exhibit A WSB September 13, 2017 Mr. Steven Clough Clough Properties, LLC 7842 College Read Baxter, MN 56425 701 Xenia Avenue South I Surte 341C1 I !Anneapdm. MN 55416 {783)541-4.800 Re: Just for Kix — Warranty Bond Request City Project No_ Sb-16-191, WSB Project No. 3433-040 Dear Mr. Clough: The City of Medina's engineering consultant {Engineer) has completed the construction observation and testing of the watermain, sanitary sewer, street and storm sewer utilities (Improvements) for the Just for Kix development as required by the Development Agreement_ The City Council must formally accept the Subdivision Improvements by resolution at a regularly scheduled council meeting_ Prior to acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, the developer is rewired to submit a one year warranty bond for 100r% of the construction costs of the Improvements. for this project, the warranty band shall be In the amount of S40,000.00 based on the construction ctsst estimates previously provided by the developer's engineer_ The warranty bond shall carver watermain utility repairs, Including any street disturbances necessary to facilitate the utility repairs, required within the warranty period_ City staff and the Engineer will consider a reduction In the Letter of Credit (LOC) after the City Council formally accepts the Subdivision Improvements_ Please submit the warranty bond effective for one calendar year to the attention of City Administrator Scott Johnson at Medina City Hall. The approval of the LOC reduction will be contingent upon receipt of the warranty band. Sincerely, WSB $ Associates, lot. Jim Strome!, P.E_ City Engineer Resolution No. 2017-## 3 September 19, 2017 Agenda Item # 5F Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-## RESOLUTION APPROVING SETBACK VARIANCE FROM RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR MCDONALD'S AT 822 HIGHWAY 55 WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, McDonald's Corporation (the "Applicant"), owns property located at 822 Highway 55 (the "Property"), which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County desires to acquire right-of-way from the Applicant for construction of a public street upon the northern portion of the Property; and WHEREAS, construction of this street will necessitate removal of an existing trash enclosure and storage building on the Property; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested a variance to reduce the required structure setback for replacement of the trash enclosure and storage building from 25 feet to 1.34 feet from the right-of-way being acquired; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the requested variance at a duly noticed public meeting on August 8, 2017 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the requested variance at the September 5, 2017 meeting, reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation, and heard testimony from City staff, the Applicant and other interested parties; and WHEREAS, based on the written and oral record before the Planning Commission and City Council on the above dates as well as all additional testimony submitted to the City, the City Council makes the following findings of facts in regards to the variance request: 1. The proposed variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Zoning Ordinance, because the proposed location of the trash enclosure and storage building would comply with relevant regulations but for the acquisition of right-of-way upon the Property. 2. The principal use is a reasonable use which is permitted in the district and the trash enclosure and storage building are reasonable accessory uses. 3. The plight of the Applicant was created by acquisition of right-of-way from the Property and removal of the existing trash enclosure and storage building for Resolution No. 2017-## September 19, 2017 construction of a public street on the Property. This plight was not created by the landowner and is unique to the Property. 4. The proposed variance does not confer special privileges which are not afforded to owners of other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district and will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 5. The Applicant has established that there are practical difficulties in complying with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby approves a variance to reduce the required setback from 25 feet to 1.34 feet, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) Except as modified by this approval, the Applicant shall construct the trash enclosure and storage structure and install the landscaping as shown on the plans received by the City on 8/22/2017. 2) The Applicant shall meet the recommendation of the City Engineer. 3) The Applicant shall obtain a building permit within one calendar year of the date of approval or the variance approval shall be null and void, unless the Applicant requests and the City Council grants an extension. Dated: September 19, 2017. By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: By: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017-## 2 September 19, 2017 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property PARCEL I: THAT OF THE SOUTHEAST .4 OF THE NORTHEAST 4 OF SECTION II, TOWNSHIP 118 NORTH, RANGE 23 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID QUARTER —QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 1E, DISTANCE 164 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; 7HENGE CONTINUING SOUTH 262J FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 116 AND STATE HIGHWAY NO. 55; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 55, DISTANT NO FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 1r, DISTANT 7R,7 FEET; THENCE DEFLECT TO THE RIGHT 17 DEGREES 45 MNUTES, DISTANT 105 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, 240.55 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGNNING, EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 40.00 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF 'HENNEPIN FOR ROADWAY. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE EAST OF THE NORTHEAST is SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 118 NORTH, RANGE 23 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 55, DISTANT 290 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM THE EAST ONE OF 5AV NORTHEAST 4; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 7613 FEET; THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 17 DECREES 45 MINUTES, A DISTANCE OF 105 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LAND TO BE DESCRIBED. THENCE EAST TO A POINT IN THE EAST ONE OF SAID NORTHEAST & DISTANT 164 FEET SOUTH FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 4 OF THE NORTHEAST & THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO A POINT DISTANT 70 FEET NORTH FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST & OF THE NORTHEAST & THENCE WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LNE OF THE NORTHEAST y OF THE NORTHEAST & A DISTANCE OF 33 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 336.5 FEET TO A POINT A DISTANT 115 FEET NORTH FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHEAST 4; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 203.8 FEET ALONG A LINE OF WHICH iF EXTENDED WOULD NTERSECT THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST y OF THE NORTHEAST 4 AT A POINT DISTANT 503 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH TO A POINT A DISTANT 60 FEET NORTH FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 4 OF THE NORTHEAST & THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY NO. 55, A DISTANCE OF 236.35 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY A DISTANCE OF P13.65 FEET TO A POINT DISTANT 123.5 FEET NORTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH TO THE PONT OF BEGINNING. Resolution No. 2017-## 3 September 19, 2017 Agenda Item # 7A 1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2017- RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED TAX LEVY FOR 2018 WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has adopted legislation, which requires all municipalities to pass a resolution adopting a preliminary budget and certifying the total proposed tax levy amount to the County Auditor prior to September 30, 2017; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Medina, Minnesota, to comply with this law and submit a proposed property tax levy including general operating and debt levies; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the City of Medina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be proposed for 2018 upon the taxable property in the City of Medina, for the following purposes: To raise $3,229,026 as adequate revenue for the general fund operating budget, $541,291 as adequate revenue for debt service, and $134,500 for capital equipment. General Fund $3,229,026 Capital Equipment $ 134,500 Debt Service: 2010A G.O. Improvement Bonds $ 29,500 2011A G.O. Bonds $ 14,000 2011B Taxable G.O. Improvement Bonds $ 58,000 2012A G.O. CIP Bonds $ 243,915 2013A G.O. Refunding Bonds $ 133,917 2015A G.O. Improvement Bonds $ 61,959 Total Levy: $3,904,817 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk, Jodi Gallup, is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the county auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Date: September 19, 2017. Bob Mitchell., Mayor ATTEST: Jodi Gallup, City Clerk Resolution No. 2017- September 19, 2017 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017- 2 September 19, 2017 Agenda Item # 7A2 Member _ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2017-xx RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED GENERAL FUND BUDGET FOR 2018 BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the City of Medina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be proposed for the 2017 General Fund budget: Revenues Expenditures General Fund $4,426,643 $4,426,643 Date: September 19, 2017 Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Agenda Item # 7A3 Member _ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2017-xx RESOLUTION REDUCING DEBT SERVICE TAX LEVIES FOR 2018 WHEREAS, Hennepin County maintains a bond register with the City's scheduled bonded debt levies for taxes payable in 2018, and requests a City resolution canceling the debt levy if the City does not levy the scheduled amounts; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that specific debt levies may be partially reduced due to the accumulation and projection of other revenue sources, including previously collected tax levies, previously collected and future projected special assessments, and utility fund contributions; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the City of Medina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following reductions of debt service levies be made for taxes payable in 2018: Scheduled Proposed Reduction Levy Levy To Levy Debt Service: 2010A G.O. Improvement Bonds $ 29,576 $ 29,500 $ 76 2011A G.O. Bonds $ 21,567 $ 14,000 $ 7,567 2011B Taxable G.O. Improvement Bonds $ 87,092 $ 58,000 $ 29,092 2012A G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds $ 304,894 $ 243,915 $ 60,979 2013A G.O. Refunding Bonds $ 167,396 $ 133,917 $ 33,479 2015A G.O. Improvement Bonds $ 61,959 $ 61,959 $ 2016A G.O. Refunding Bonds $ 95,213 $ - $ 95,213 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk Jodi Gallup, is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the county auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Date: September 6, 2017 Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: September 13, 2017 MEETING: September 19, 2017 City Council SUBJ: Excelsior Group LLC — PUD Concept Plan Review — 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road Review Deadline Complete Application Received: July 28, 2017 60-day Review Deadline: September 26, 2017 Summary of Request The Excelsior Group, LLC has requested review of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Plan for a 68-lot residential development north of Chippewa Road and west of Mohawk Drive. The subject site is a total of 37 acres (31.3 net acres), with two single family homes. Much of the property is pasture with some tilled farmland. The applicant's concept also identifies five wetlands located throughout the site and two additional potential wetland areas. The subject site is guided for Low Density Residential development in the current Comprehensive Plan within the 2021-2025 staging period. The Comp Plan would permit a property to develop up to two years early through an incentive -based point system. As such, the property would not be permitted to be developed until 2019 under the existing Comprehensive Plan, even with the "jump ahead" provision. The applicant seeks approval for this jump ahead provision to permit construction during 2018 and they propose homes to be occupied in 2019. The properties are zoned Rural Residential -Urban Reserve, which is an interim zoning designation for property until development occurs consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Property to the north and west are currently rural residential lots, planned for future low density development in the Comp Plan after 2021. Polaris is located to the southeast of the subject property and the Wealshire is under construction to the east. The property south of Chippewa Road is planned for future commercial development. An aerial of the site and surrounding property can be found at the top of the following page. The purpose of a PUD Concept Plan is to provide feedback to the applicant prior to a formal application. The Planning Commission and City Council will not take any action and the feedback is purely advisory. The applicant had provided two concept plans on the same property for review during the summer and fall of 2016. Excelsior Group Page 1 of 10 September 19, 2017 PUD Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting ar".1 et Site �'/Vea,ysahir'e Future Lo l� 1�1 fi` .,�� e rl nstN� Resideril Purpose of a Planned Unit Development According to Section 827.25, PUD provisions are established to provide comprehensive procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is intended to encourage: 1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 2. Higher standards of site and building design. 3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. Excelsior Group Page 2 of 10 September 19, 2017 PUD Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting 4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low -impact development practices which result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of the City. 5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses. 6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and service facilities. 7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower development costs and public investments. 8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) 9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. City Code requires the flexibility permitted under the Staging Plan to be considered within the context of a PUD. Comprehensive Plan As noted above, the subject properties are guided Low Density Residential (LDR) in the current Comp Plan, which would anticipate development with a net density of 2-3.5 units per acre. The properties were part of the Staging Plan amendment completed in 2015, which changed the properties from the 2016-2020 staging period to the 2021-2025 staging period. The amendment also reduced the amount of flexibility permitted for developing prior to the staging period. A residential development can occur two years prior to the staging period (rather than up to 5 years early). As such, the properties could not be developed until 2019 without a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The applicant argues that they would not occupy houses until 2019, which they argue could be consistent with the staging, even if construction were to begin in 2018. The City is currently in the midst of its decennial Comprehensive Plan update. The Steering Committee has completed a draft of the Plan, which has been out for public and jurisdictional feedback for almost a year. The City anticipates that the Plan update will be in effect before the subject sites could be developed in 2019. The draft 2040 Comp Plan update designates the subject property as Low Density Residential, but delays the staging of the property to 2025. Property to the west, north, and northeast of the site has been guided as Rural Residential within the draft Plan update, no longer being included within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The DRAFT Comprehensive Plan is available on the City's website, and the Draft Future Land Use map is attached for reference. Because the DRAFT Comprehensive Plan update is within the review process, staff believes it is relevant to consider in connection with a proposed development, even if it is not yet in effect. Excelsior Group Page 3 of 10 September 19, 2017 PUD Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting Proposed Site Layout The applicant proposes 68 single family lots. 40 of the lots, predominantly in the western portion of the site and along the northern boundary, are proposed to be 90-feet in width and 11,000 s.f. in area. These lots would generally align with the R1 zoning district standards, which is the district utilized by the City to implement the LDR land use. The concept plan identifies 28 "villa" style lots which are 65-feet wide and 7,000 s.f. in area. The applicant has not explicitly requested setback flexibility beyond the lot size consideration. R1 Requirement 90-foot lots Villa lots Minimum Lot Size 11,000 s.f. 7,000 s.f. Minimum Lot Width 90 feet 65 feet Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet Front Yard Setback (garage) 30 feet 30 feet Side Yard Setback (combined) 25 feet (15 & 10) 15 feet (7.5 & 7.5) Side Yard (corner) 25 feet 25 feet Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 25 feet Max. Hardcover 40% 50% The concept plan shows a 1.37 acre park near the center of the development. The proposed density appears to be 2.3 units/acre, compared to the 2.0-3.5 units/acre requirement of the LDR land use. There is a discrepancy between this number and the applicant's calculations on their plans because they did not subtract wetland buffer areas. This would need to be confirmed following completion of a wetland delineation and final plans, because there is another approximately .88 area of potential wetland/buffer shown on their concept which they do not believe is wetland. The applicant proposes a single access point off of Chippewa Road, at the location of the existing 2212 Chippewa Road driveway. Tree Preservation and Buffer Yards Few trees are located on the subject properties. Any application would be subject to the City's tree preservation and replacement requirements. Staff believes it is extremely important for any development to provide a substantial landscaped buffer yards adjacent to rural properties to the west and north. Wetlands and Floodplain The subject properties appear to contain five wetlands, which most of the wetland areas being in the southern portion of the site. The applicant proposes impacts to the southwestern wetland in order to construct a street to serve lots in this portion of the site and also to impact a small wetland in the eastern portion of the site. The concept plan identifies the City's minimum upland buffers around remaining wetland areas. FEMA maps identify no floodplains on the subject properties. Excelsior Group Page 4 of 10 September 19, 2017 PUD Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting Staff would recommend considering removing the three lots in the southwest corner of the property. This would allow a reduction of wetland impacts for the street connection to the southeast. These lots would have a higher potential of impacts to adjacent rural property because of the location of improvements on neighboring property. This property could either be preserved as open space or potentially for development when and if the MUSA is ever extended to property to the west during a future Comp Plan process. Transportation The applicant proposes a single access point at Chippewa Road, located where the 2212 Chippewa driveway is today. If the applicant proceeds with a formal application, information should be provided to determine if improvements should be required for Chippewa Road. Mohawk Drive has limited right-in/right-out access to the east of the site. As a result, eastbound traffic would be required to go west on Chippewa Road to Willow Drive in order to turn left onto Highway 55. The City has identified a future connection of Chippewa Road east of Mohawk Drive to connect with Arrowhead Drive. Staff believes this connection is important to support development in the area of Chippewa Road/Mohawk Drive and for public safety. This road connection is not yet in place and staff believes that it is important that provisions are made for construction of this street before any property is allowed to jump ahead pursuant to the staging plan flexibility. The concept plan shows a connection between the neighborhood and the property to the west. If the surrounding property is guided as rural residential, these connections may not be advisable. As noted above, staff would recommend against development in their corner of the site because of the adjacent rural land use. Sewer/Water If development were to occur at the subject site, sewer and water infrastructure would be required to be extended from Mohawk Drive to the property. The applicant would also be required to loop the water main to connect to the main north of the Wealshire project. A preliminary review indicates that the subject site could be served through gravity sewer lines to the existing system. As proposed, the subject property would be served by a single water main along Highway 55 (to Mohawk) without any looping. The City Engineer and Public Works state that having a second means to route water to this neighborhood would be important. The City's water plan identifies a second water main along new Chippewa Road from Mohawk Drive east to Arrrowhead Drive. This water main connection is not yet in place and staff believes that it is important that provisions are made for construction of this connection before any property is allowed to jump ahead pursuant to the staging plan flexibility. Stormwater/LID Review/Grading Review The Concept Plan does not include full grading or stormwater plans. Any development proposal would ultimately be subject to relevant stormwater standards. Excelsior Group Page 5 of 10 September 19, 2017 PUD Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting Park Dedication The City's subdivision regulations requires up to 10% of the buildable property to be dedicated for park purposes. The City may also choose to accept cash in -lieu of all or a portion of this land dedication in an amount equal to 8% of the pre -developed market value, up to a maximum of $8000 per home. Staff does not believe the fee would reach the maximum in this case, but it will be determined more precisely during the preliminary plat review if the applicant proceeds with a formal application. The concept plan identifies an approximately 1.37 acre park area. The concept plan also identifies trail connections through the neighborhood connecting to Chippewa Road and to Wealshire. If the applicant proceeds with a formal application, the connection to Wealshire, which is private property, would need to be discussed with the property owner. The nearest City Park is fairly distant from the subject site. The City's draft Park Plan has identified the need for a neighborhood City park in this area to support residential development on the subject site and other nearby parcels. A neighborhood park is likely between 4-10 acres in area, depending on the anticipated nearby population and improvements desired. Staff believes it is important for this park to be provided if property is to develop earlier than the staging plan suggests. The Park Commission reviewed the concept plan at their August 16 meeting. An excerpt from their draft meeting minutes is attached for reference. The consensus of the Commission was that a public park should be required within this development if it were to move ahead and that the park should be much larger to accommodate recreational activities. There was discussion about providing field space which can be multi -purpose, but large enough to accommodate different uses, including baseball, which needs the most space. Commissioners also saw the park as serving as a destination, and emphasized the importance of adequate parking. Staging Plan Flexibility As noted above, the draft 2040 Comp Plan update stages the subject property for development after 2025. The current Comprehensive Plan stages the property for development after 2021, and would permit flexibility to development up to 2 years sooner. The applicant desires to construct the neighborhood in 2018, with the first home being occupied in 2019. Section 825.34 of the City Code states that "the city council, following consultation of the planning commission, may consider requests for flexibility to the date which city water and sanitary sewer utility services are available according to the Phasing Plan, as permitted within the Comprehensive Plan. Properties shall only be prioritized for early development when it is determined by the city that a proposed project significantly achieves the criteria described below..." The subsection continues: "The city council shall deny a request for flexibility to the Phasing Plan, except upon a finding that the proposed project significantly achieves the criteria identified...below. The following represents the minimum standard which must be met in order for the city council to consider flexibility to the Phasing Plan. The city council shall have the discretion to require achievement of additional city objectives during the review process. Excelsior Group Page 6 of 10 September 19, 2017 PUD Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting (1) The crucial factor described... shall be determined to be achieved; and (2) Fifty or more points shall be achieved amongst the various primary and secondary factors...." Following are the criteria for reviewing requests for Phasing Plan Flexibility. The applicant has provided a description within their narrative on how they believe these factors are achieved. Staff has provided some comments behind a number of the criteria in italics for consideration by the Planning Commission and Council. (a) Crucial factor: Infrastructure Capacity. The city shall review existing sanitary sewer, water, and street infrastructure to determine if sufficient capacity exists to support all three of the following: 1) existing development previously approved by the City; 2) the proposed project; and 3) all other development which has been identified in the Comprehensive Plan for the current Phasing period. If existing capacity is determined to be insufficient for the proposed project, but the project proposes to make necessary improvements, the city may give consideration to such proposal, provided the improvements are constructed at no cost to the city or other property owners. The improvements shall also be consistent with city infrastructure plans and policies and be designed to serve other future development when appropriate. In terms of the crucial factors, staff raised questions above related to both transportation and domestic water supply for the subject site. A future road connection for Chippewa Road east of Mohawk Drive was identified in the Comprehensive Plan to support development in this area and has not been constructed. The need to loop the water system has also been identified and not yet provided. Staff believes the water main connection is a fairly time sensitive improvement necessary for consideration with any flexibility to the staging plan. Provisions also need to be made for the construction of Chippewa Road to the east of Mohawk Drive. Staff recognizes that this project will be complicated and may take a longer time period to implement. As such, a means for a significant contribution towards the construction of Chippewa Road could be considered in connection with a request for Staging Plan flexibility. Staff has also identified park infrastructure as a need in order to support development. 1.3 acres of parkland is inadequate to support development in the area. A minimum of 3 acres would be required under standard park dedication calculations. (b) Primary factors (maximum of 10 points per item): (1) Sustainability. To achieve this objective, the project shall incorporate sustainable practices such as high energy efficiency, responsible construction materials and processes, site design which supports multiple transportation options, and other sustainable practices. The proposed site layout does appear to provide good opportunities for non -motorized transportation. Excelsior Group Page 7 of 10 September 19, 2017 PUD Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting (2) Natural resource protection and low impact development. To achieve this objective, the project shall incorporate low impact development practices and exceptional natural resource and ecological preservation. Meeting the minimum tree preservation and wetland protection regulations shall be equivalent to one point, with additional points granted for additional preservation. The applicant proposes to reuse stormwater for irrigation and provide two trees per lot, which essentially abide by the City's minimum standards for any development. The removal of the lots in the southeast corner of the site would contribute towards additional natural resource protection. (3) Proximity to existing development. To achieve this objective, the project shall be adjacent to or a short distance from existing development which is served by city utility services. Property which is immediately adjacent to existing development shall be granted the most points, with fewer points granted with increased distance. The subject site is adjacent to the Wealshire project currently under construction and across the street from Polaris's headquarters. The property south of Chippewa Road is within the current staging period. Property to the north and west is planned for rural uses under the draft 2040 Comp Plan. (4) Open Space Protection. To achieve this objective, the project shall permanently protect open space from development. The number of points granted shall be based on the relative size of the open space area protected and the ecological value of the open space. The applicant proposes additional open space to the south of the narrow wetland in the southeastern portion of the site. The applicant proposes a 1.3 acre park, which is less than would be anticipated with standard park dedication requirements. The removal of the lots in the southeast corner of the site would contribute towards additional open space protection. (5) Limited impacts on city services. Points for this objective shall be based upon the expected need for city services, with fewer points granted for projects which have a higher potential impact. For example: (i) Projects which can access regional roadways with limited distance on city streets may be granted additional points. (ii) Commercial uses which create lower levels of traffic, particularly truck traffic, may be granted additional points. (iii) Commercial uses with lower water usage may be granted additional points. The City has identified the need for Chippewa Road to be extended to serve development in this area. A means to provide this connection should be secured in connection with any discussion related to staging plan flexibility. (c) Secondary factors (maximum of 5 points per item): (1) High quality architectural design and materials. Points may be granted for this objective for a number of different elements. Meeting the minimum requirements of the Excelsior Group Page 8 of 10 September 19, 2017 PUD Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting underlying zoning district with regards to building materials, modulation, and other relevant standards would be equivalent to one point. Additional elements may include: (i) Varying types of home within a single-family development. (ii) Utilization of more high quality building materials, such as brick and stone, than is required by the underlying zoning district. (iii) Four-sided architecture. The applicant has suggested that it would be high quality. No architectural guidelines or examples have been provided. (2) Community amenities. Points may be granted for this objective based on a number of different amenities, examples of which include: (i) Private trails, recreational, or gathering areas beyond which is required as part of park dedication requirements. (ii) High quality signage and lighting fixtures, to be maintained by the property owner(s). The concept plan includes a fairly substantial network of trails within the neighborhood. A 1.3 acre park is proposed, which would be smaller than expected to support the area. (3) Affordable housing (residential development only). To achieve this objective, affordability shall be guaranteed by a covenant or similar means approved by the city. The amount of points granted shall be based on the level of affordability as well as the proportion of units which are affordable. The applicant does not propose to guarantee affordability, but does believe the villa product on the east portion of the site would provide some diversification of housing style. (4) Employment opportunities (commercial/business development only). Points for this objective shall be based on the number of employees, especially new positions which will be filled after the user begins operations within the city. Not relevant. (5) Other factors. The City may grant additional points to projects that meet objectives which are not specifically described above. Review Criteria The purpose of the PUD Concept Plan is to provide purely advisory comments to the applicant for their consideration whether and how to continue with a formal application. The City has a great deal of discretion when reviewing a PUD because it is a rezoning, which is a legislative action. A PUD should only be approved if it achieves the purposes of the PUD district (described on pages 2-3), the Comprehensive Plan, and other City policies. In this case the request is also required to meet the staging plan flexibility criteria. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider the request within this context. Planning Commission Comments The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the concept plan at the August 8 meeting. An excerpt from the meeting minutes is attached for reference. Generally, Commissioners raised questions whether existing infrastructure is in place to support the development, specifically Excelsior Group Page 9 of 10 September 19, 2017 PUD Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting related to the single water main serving this area of the City and the lack of the eastern street connection to Arrowhead. Commissioners also generally did not find that the proposed subdivision met the higher standards required for development under the staging plan flexibility or the purposes of the PUD. Staff Comments Staff believes that it is best to consider the concept plan within the broader context of the draft Comprehensive Plan update in addition to the current Comprehensive Plan and the criteria for the staging plan flexibility. The draft proposes to delay development upon the subject site until 2025 and also re -guides property to the west, north, and northeast as rural residential. It is interesting to note that each of the parcels included in the concept plan is located within a different school district; the western parcel within Wayzata, and the eastern parcel within Rockford. If the applicant proceeds with a formal application after receiving the comments from the Planning Commission and City Council about whether this proposal meets the purposes of a PUD and the criteria for Staging Plan flexibility, staff has provided comments throughout the report, which are summarized below: 1) Any future application shall be subject to all relevant City regulations and policies. 2) The applicant shall provide information necessary to confirm that gravity sewer service is practical. 3) Any proposed development proposal should include provisions for substantial vegetative buffers to rural properties to the north and west. 4) Land dedication should be considered for a neighborhood park. 5) Provisions should be made for the extension of a water main to provide a second means of providing water to the subject site 6) Provisions should be made for the future extension of Chippewa Road east of Mohawk Drive. 7) The applicant shall provide information requested by the City Engineer to determine whether street improvements are necessary to support the development. 8) The street alignment should be updated to remove the street connection to the west in order to reduce wetland impacts and development adjacent to rural property. Attachments 1. Document List 2. Excerpt from August 8, 2017 Planning Commission minutes 3. Excerpt from DRAFT August 16, 2017 Park Commission minutes 4. Email from Brian Stephenson 5. Engineering Comments dated 7-11-2017 6. DRAFT Comp Plan Information (Vision, Goals, Future Land Use) 7. Applicant Narrative 8. Concept Plan Excelsior Group Page 10 of 10 September 19, 2017 PUD Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting Project: LR-17-211— Excelsior Group PUD Concept Plan The following documents are all part of record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 6/30/2017 6/30/2017 5 Y Y Updated 7/14/2017 (3 pages) Fee 6/30/2017 6/29/2017 1 Y Y $3000 Narrative 6/30/2017 NA 4 Y Y Concept Plan 6/30/2017 4/14/2017 1 Y Y Plans 7/27/2017 N/A 4 Y Y Eng Response 7/27/2017 7/27/2017 2 Y Y Planning response 7/27/2017 7/27/2017 3 Y Y Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Legal Comments 7/17/2017 1 Y Engineer Comments 7/11/2017 2 Y Building Official Comments 7/7/2017 1 Y Elm Creek Watershed Comments 7/20/2017 1 Y Legal Notice 7/28/2017 6 Y 9 pages w/ list and affidavit Preliminary Review 7/20/2017 2 Y Planning Commission Report 8/4/2017 10 Y 33 pages w/ attachments City Council Report 9/14/2017 10 Y 45 pages w/attachments (continued on back) 9/14/2017 Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes Planning Commission minutes 8/8/2017 Y Email from Brian Stephenson 8/8/2017 Y 9/14/2017 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 8/8/2017 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing — Excelsior Group LLC — 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road — PUD Concept Plan with Staging Plan Flexibility Finke presented a PUD Concept Plan from the Excelsior Group at 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road. He noted that this is an informal review at which the Planning Commission, Park Commission and City Council provide feedback before the applicant brings forth a formal application. He stated that this would be a 68-lot subdivision on 38 acres, 36 of which are buildable. He stated that the City has been working on the draft Comprehensive Plan for the 2020-2040 time period, which is anticipated to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council at the end of the year. He noted that the draft plan would delay the staging for the low density residential property. He stated that the City is still working under the existing Comprehensive Plan until the new plan is adopted. He noted that the City has considered two previous Concept Plans for this property in the previous year. He identified the subject site and adjacent uses as well as current guiding and proposed guiding under the draft Comprehensive Plan. He identified the proposed access for the site, which would have 68 lots, noting that 20 of the lots would be villa style, while the remaining 48 lots would meet the requirements of the R-1 district. He noted that a 1.5-acre park parcel would be proposed for the center of the development. He noted that a PUD would be required to obtain the staging flexibility desired. He stated that the requests should be reviewed against the draft Comprehensive Plan as if something contradictory is approved that would conflict with the approval of the draft plan. He stated that the property is similarly guided in both plans, but the staging differs. He reviewed staff recommendations to buffer against neighboring rural residential properties and from wetlands. He stated that there is limited access at Mohawk and Highway 55, which means that eastbound traffic would need to utilize Chippewa to Willow. He stated that the Park Commission had done a previous park study and would be looking for as much parkland in this area for the first development that comes through to provide a park to those residents. He noted that the property would be split between two school districts. He stated that in order to continue through, the applicant would need flexibility to the staging plan, and he then reviewed the elements under the current Comprehensive Plan. He noted that something similar would most likely come into play under the draft plan as well. He reviewed the elements that must be considered for staging flexibility. He stated that this property is served by a single -loop watermain. He noted that the City used a lot of City resources this year to repair a watermain break. He noted that the watermain connection is identified as a need in order to support future development. He advised that a future traffic connection would also be needed in the future to support development. He noted that these two elements are important to consider and a provision should be made to ensure that these elements are addressed prior to the development being up and running, should this move forward. He noted that the provisions regarding a park would also need to be addressed to consider flexibility in staging. He stated that if those crucial factors are addressed, the applicant would then need to meet 50 points to qualify for the jump ahead staging. Reid asked for information on the difference in size specified by the applicant and staff. Finke explained that the applicant included the wetlands in their calculation. DesLauriers asked for more information on the traffic connection. Finke provided additional details. DesLauriers asked for more information on how the points system is setup, should the crucial factors be met. Finke explained that the Planning Commission would provide input to the City Council. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 8/8/2017 Meeting Minutes Ben Schmidt, Excelsior Group, stated that Finke did a good job presenting the information. He stated that they were here in 2016 with two Concept Plans and at that time the idea of the draft Comprehensive Plan was in the beginning stages and they were told to begin with the Steering Committee. He stated that they attended some of the Steering Committee meetings and at that time the discussion was for the properties to remain as rural residential and not low density residential. He stated that the Steering Committee agreed that the parcels should be guided as low density residential rather than rural residential, which suits this request. He stated that the staging did not turn out as they had desired under the draft plan, as the staging states 2025 under that plan. He stated that based on the rationale that was heard through the Steering Committee and City Council, they believed that these parcels would be developed in a similar staging to the Wealshire and Lunski properties rather than leaving the parcel orphaned. He stated that if it makes sense, he did not see anything that would change in the few years of difference in staging and that is why they are present tonight, to gauge the temperate of the City. He stated that the plan was always to split the property into two products, single-family lots and villa style lots to provide products to empty nesters as well. He noted that the villa products would not back-up to rural residential properties. He stated that a big reason for the villa product would support the current needs of the market and the neighboring Wealshire and Lunski developments. He noted that the villas would be a great feeder into the neighboring senior developments as those residents age and would also be a great fit for family members of Wealshire and Lunski residents. He stated that in terms of points for the jump ahead, they feel comfortable that the site can be served by gravity sewer. He stated that he understands the need for the City to extend Chippewa Road, but did not feel that the extension to the east would benefit this development. He noted that it would only be a short length that residents would need to travel west to Willow in order to head east on Highway 55. He stated that this would become the loop that would loop the watermain together and therefore this would be part of the solution rather than the problem. He stated that they are willing to listen to the desire for a park, as they would like the park to be used not only by residents of this development, but other residents in the area. He stated that there is a significant amount of open space proposed and perhaps that is lessened to add to the park. He stated that they would also be open to losing a few lots in order to accommodate additional park space. He stated that they are open to suggestion where the wetland is located as well, in order to minimize impacts. He stated that they feel like they would have the 50 points necessary to jump ahead and the crucial factor test could also be met. He stated that as you travel north and west there would not be any other development in the draft Comprehensive Plan and therefore they feel that the timing now would be a good fit. He stated that they believe that this development would solve some problems, such as the watermain issue, and would also provide a desired product that would fit well with the senior developments surrounding the site. Reid asked if the villas would be single story. Schmidt stated that would be the intent, but noted that villas are often unpredictable as some could have a loft. He noted that the intent would be for empty nesters. Reid asked the price point. Schmidt estimated high $300,000s to mid $400,000s. He noted that the villas would be association maintained and some could support a three -car garage. He noted that 25 percent of their villa sales have three -car garages to support the desires of the buyers to store additional items such as vehicles and golf carts. White stated that some of the villa's lots would not meet the zoning standards for the lot size and asked if the homes built on the smaller lots would be smaller as well. She stated that it does not appear that the setback variances would be needed if that is the intent. 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 8/8/2017 Meeting Minutes Schmidt stated that the variances would provide the building pad they think they need. He acknowledged that there would be less space between the homes on those smaller lots. He stated that people are asking for a smaller lot with less yard for those products. He provided the average square footage of a villa at 1,400 to 1,500 square feet on one level. White opened the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. Corey Wiskow, VP of Wealshire Bloomington, expressed full -support for the project as he believes that it would blend well with the surrounding development. Jeff Pederson spoke of the pressure that is being put onto Mohawk Drive. He stated that they do not know how much traffic the Wealshire project will bring to the community He stated that the developments to the west have already paid for the Willow stoplight, which would have additional pressure. He referenced the watermain break that occurred and noted that if that occurred in the winter, the road would have needed to be shut down. He believed that the staging time should not be reduced in order to allow the City to get the plan in place for the road. He stated that the neighbors to the north and west would need to be screened appropriately as they are zoned rural residential. He hoped that the City would not ask for a Comprehensive Plan amendment, as the Steering Committee and Council have worked hard on the draft plan which is currently out for jurisdictional review. Finke submitted a written comment from Brian Stephenson that will become a part of the record and has been provided to the Commission. White closed the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. Reid stated that there would be two requests for the PUD and jump ahead. She did not believe that the criteria for the PUD would be met as she did not feel this would be an innovative development and the site plan is fairly ordinary. She stated that the wetland protection, tree planting, and stormwater reuses are already required. She did not believe this is a creative use of land or is efficient. She stated that the main goal seems to be approval for the smaller lots and she does not feel that is an adequate use of a PUD. She stated that the PUD and jump ahead are meant for special development with special criteria to be met. She did not feel that the criteria were met as the development only meets the minimum requirements and does not go above and beyond. She stated that there would be an impact on City infrastructure and roads. She did not feel that the project meets the requirements for the PUD or jump ahead. DesLauriers stated that his concerns were regarding the crucial factors that must be met. He stated that the draft plan identifies the staging as such because of the crucial factors that need to be addressed. He asked for clarification on when construction could begin. Finke stated that there is a grey area on when construction can begin and occupation can occur. He stated that it is not unprecedented for the review and construction process to begin prior to the staging period year. Nester noted that it is unprecedented to begin three years before the staging. Finke stated that the other commercial case that he was speaking of began construction the summer before the staging year. 3 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 8/8/2017 Meeting Minutes White stated that the jump ahead would not serve the City, as the infrastructure is not in place. She stated that the City has not yet been able to determine the impact that Wealshire and perhaps Lunski would place on the roadways. She noted that the watermain is also an issue. She believed that the identified staging for the property would be appropriate in order to allow the infrastructure time to develop. Finke stated that if there are provisions for the infrastructure improvements, the staging jump ahead could make sense. He explained that if a developer provides for the infrastructure improvements, a jump ahead would be an option. White stated that she appreciates the thought and effort, but agrees that the project is not unique and would not meet the objectives for the jump ahead. She appreciated the different housing products, but noted that the property does not have unique features to preserve, which makes it difficult to achieve those objectives. DesLauriers stated that the developer commented that the road would be adequate and the watermain would not be an issue. He asked if a traffic study has been done. Finke stated that ultimately a traffic study would not take into effect that this would not be the transportation network that the City has identified. He stated that it is a bigger study than simply being a capacity issue. Nester agreed with the comments of Reid. Finke noted that the Park Commission will tentatively review this on August 16th and the City Council will tentatively review this request on September 5th or 19th 4 Medina Park Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 8/16/2017 Meeting Minutes The Excelsior Group, LLC — PUD Concept Plan Review — 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road — Park Dedication Review Gallup provided a brief staff report. She stated that the applicant has requested a PUD concept plan review for a 68-lot residential development on 37 acres. She stated that the property is guided as Low Density Residential (LDR) within the 2021-2025 Staging Period. The staging plan has a point system to allow applicants to jump ahead up to two years by earning certain points for going above and beyond the minimum requirements. Gallup stated that the updated draft Comprehensive Plan that is currently out for area jurisdictional review identifies the property as LDR, within the 2025-2030 Staging Period. Gallup stated that the Park Commission reviewed two concept plans of this site back in the summer and fall of 2016, which the Park Commission indicated that they would like to see a future park planned on this site. She stated that the subject site is located north of Chippewa Road and west of Mohawk Drive, which is in one of the Park Commission's active park study areas. She showed the Park Commission a map of the surrounding parcels in the active park study area and described each parcel's proposed land use. Gallup showed a picture of the concept plan, which included a proposed 1.37-acre park and a few trails. She noted that the 68-lots would be a mix of 28 villa lots and 40 R1 lots with a net density of 2.3 units per acre. Gallup listed the crucial, primary, and secondary factors for the staging plan flexibility; noting that a park was a crucial factor. Gallup explained the park dedication ordinance in terms of this application, noting that the city could require up to 10% of the buildable land, which would equate to about 3.1 acres, 8% of the pre -developed value, potentially $300,000-$450,0000, or a combination. Gallup stated that the Park and Trail Plan shows a proposed east -west trail between Mohawk Drive and Willow Drive. She also noted the plan identifies a future neighborhood park in this area to be approximately 4-10 acres in size. Gallup reiterated that points could be provided within the Staging Plan Flexibility for additional park land and improvements that are above and beyond the minimum requirement of 3.1 acres. Ben Schmidt, with Excelsior Group, addressed the Park Commission stating that he in visions the proposed park to be a hub that connects the surrounding developments. He stated that their wetland delineation report came back today showing less impact than they originally thought. He said that he would like to see the park bigger and is here tonight to find out what the Park Commission wants. He stated that he wants the City to be proud of this park and realizes the need for a park in this area. Gallup described the size of three existing neighborhood parks and the features each park possessed: — Fields of Medina = 10 acres (7 acres active after removing future water tower and pond) • Soccer field (1.1 acre) • Playground/Basketball Court (0.75 acre) • Tennis Court (0.25 acre) • Volleyball Court (0.15 acre) • Parking Lot (0.45 acre) - Hunter Lions Park = 4.25 acres active; 2.7 acre passive 1 Medina Park Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 8/16/2017 Meeting Minutes • Baseball field (2.0 acre) • Playground (0.2 acre) • Tennis/Basketball Courts (0.26 acre) • Volleyball Court (0.15 acre) • Parking lot (0.6 acre) — Morningside Park = 2.3 acres • Baseball field (1.16 acre) • Playground (0.35 acre) Gallup noted that parks tend to be at least two times or more the size of the improvements to allow for space between improvements, trails, utility space, etc. Lee polled the Park Commissioners asking them what their initial thoughts are for this proposed park area. Rumsey stated that he thought the proposed park should be similar in size to Hunter Lions Park and should include baseball, basketball, and a playground. Beddor stated she would like to see baseball or soccer and a playground. Jacob stated that he would like to see some consideration given on the site selection to make sure the park is being placed on quality land and not in swamp land. Cole questioned the size of a baseball field and stated that some open space should be reserved for a possible future soccer or baseball field, depending on the needs of the neighborhood. Cousineau asked if she could add that a gazebo would be nice to create a gathering area. Schmidt confirmed a gazebo was shown in the original concept plan. Lee stated that there was a consensus of the Park Commission that there should be a park planned in this development. He also stated that the Park Commission would like this park to be a destination point that people will get excited about visiting. He stated that some parking would be needed, which will take up additional acres. He stated that a playground should be built first and leave some open field space to provide flexibility to create a soccer or baseball field in the future. He stated that a pavilion should be in the public space. Jacob stated that the specific features of the park should be data driven when the time comes to develop the park. Schmidt thanked the Park Commission for their comments and said that he will make the park better. He stated that he understands that the community would be better off having one bigger more dynamic park in this area instead of more smaller parks to maintain 2 Dusty Finke From: BrianStephenson <bstephconst@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 1:52 PM To: Dusty Finke Subject: Brindle Path Dusty, This Brian Stephenson, I will not be able to Attend the meeting in regards to Brindle Path tonight. We spoke last week about it. I would like this to be public record that I am against the project to be bumped forward on the time line unless my property Is included. I will not be rural as you guys call it with 68 houses right behind me and the Wealshire building. Thanks, Brian Stephenson i WSB Associates. Inc. engineering • planning • environmental • construction July 11, 2017 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: The Excelsior Group Concept Plan III — Engineering Review City Project No. LR-17-211 WSB Project No. 010387-000 Dear Mr. Finke: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed The Excelsior Group Concept plan submittal dated June 30, 2017. The plans propose to construct a total of 68 lots with 40 of them being customary single family lots and the other 28 being single family "villa" lots. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Site Plan & Civil 1. Verify structure builds and the feasibility of serving the area with a gravity sewer system as proposed. Show where the proposed connection points would be located to the existing system. The applicant did provide confirmation of this with a previous concept plan, please verify this is still the case with the current concept. 2. Looping connections will be required to minimize long dead-end watermain sections. The adjacent property to the east has constructed a watermain that provides a stub to the very northeast corner of The Excelsior Group site. 3. Verify that adequate water pressure will be available for those lots served by City water. 4. The concept plan shows a trail connection to the neighboring property to the east. The site plan for the adjacent property does not include a trail connection to this location. The applicant will need to work with the adjacent property owner to provide trail connections. Traffic 1. The concept plan shows future roadway connections to the west of the proposed development. The applicant should provide an estimate of the ultimate traffic volume that would utilize the proposed roadways to reach this future expansion. 111 Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com 10010387-000\Admin\Docs\2017-06-30 Submittal\_2017-07-12 Excelsior Group Concept Plan - WSB Commcnts.docx The Excelsior Group Concept Plan III — Engineering Review July 11, 2017 Page 2 2. The intersections should be analyzed to determine if turn lanes are required on Chippewa Road or nearby intersections for either capacity or safety. 3. The proposed intersections and trail crossings at Chippewa Road should be analyzed for sight distance issues or concerns. 4. Dependent on the increase on vehicular traffic, the development may contribute to the need for extending Chippewa Road to the east between Mohawk Drive and Arrowhead Dive. Stormwater & Wetlands 5. The development will need to meet the City's infiltration requirement, which can be met by reusing stormwater from the proposed ponds for irrigation. 6. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards. 7. A wetland delineation report and replacement plan is required prior to any wetland impact. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. 47.=L•L- Jim Stremel, P.E. K:\010387-000\Admin\Does\2017-06-30 Submittal\ 2017-07-12 Excelsior Group Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx Chapter 2: VISION & COMMUNITY GOALS The Vision and Community Goals chapter is the heart of the Comprehensive Plan and provides the foundation from which City officials make consistent and supporting land use decisions. This chapter includes a set of general community goals that guided the creation of this Plan. The concepts in this chapter are some of the few static elements of the Comprehensive Plan. If land uses change or other infrastructure varies from the Plan, decisions will be founded in the goals set forth below. The Vision and Goals were created with the involvement of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee (the "Steering Committee'), City officials, and residents of Medina and are broadly supported. Land use designations are subject to strong social and economic pressures to change. Accordingly, it is appropriate that such systems be periodically evaluated in light of changing social and economic conditions. As development evolves, the Vision and Goals will provide the guidance for accomplishing the vision for the future of the community even when changes are necessary to the land use plan. Detailed objectives and recommendations are contained within each of the subject chapters of this plan. Creating the Vision and Goals The residents, the Steering Committee, City officials and staff participated in the planning process for the Plan. A series of public participation meetings were conducted to introduce and solicit information from the residents of Medina. The Steering Committee held work sessions that focused on integrating the concerns and desires of the community together with accommodating growth and regional impacts. An online forum provided additional opportunity for residents to impact the Vision and Community Goals as they were formulated. In addition to land use and growth planning, the City implemented open space, natural resources, and infrastructure planning. The goals which guided this process are integrated into this chapter. Each element of this plan was developed with assistance from city officials and a diverse group of community stakeholders producing a truly representative plan. The City made a conscious decision to emphasize natural resources and open space conservation. Community Vision The following statement provides a vision of the community for the future and the resultant goals and strategies. Medina is a community united by a common goal: to sustain and enhance the quality of life of its residents. Medina will protect its significant natural resources and open space throughout the City, while honoring its rural heritage and fostering safe and well - Chapter 2 - Vision and Community Goals DRAFT - February 7, 2017 IVIEDINA Page 2 - 1 designed neighborhoods, places of recreation and destinations for citizens to gather. Development within the City will be commensurate with available transportation systems, municipal services and school capacity. Community Goals The following Community Goals are derived from the Vision Statement and inform objectives and strategies throughout the various aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Preserve rural vistas, open spaces, and wetlands in all parts of the community to promote the rural character of Medina. Protect and enhance the environment and natural resources throughout the community. Encourage and incent innovative and environmentally friendly approaches to planning, engineering and development. Expand urban services only as necessary to accommodate regionally forecasted residential growth, desired business opportunities and achievement of other Community Goals. Such development and growth shall be at a sustainable pace proportionate with capacity of schools and transportation, water supply and wastewater infrastructure available to the City. Spread development so that it is not geographically concentrated during particular timeframes. Promote public and private gathering places and civic events that serve the entire community. Preserve and expand trails and parks to provide community recreational facilities, connect neighborhoods, and encourage healthy lifestyles of its residents. Provide opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of costs to support residents at all stages of their lives. Encourage an attractive, vibrant business community that complements the residential areas of the City. Maintain its commitment to public safety through support of the City's police department and coordination with its contracted volunteer fire departments. Manage the City through prudent budgeting processes, retaining a skilled and efficient staff and long-range planning and financial management. Chapter 2 - Vision and Community Goals DRAFT - February 7, 2017 f. T Y 6 fi 1VI EDI NAB Page 2 - 2 The Guide Plan Medina's Future Land Use Plan, Map 5-2, maintains Medina's rural character and protects the City's natural resources while accommodating limited growth and development which is consistent with the City's Vision, Community Goals and Land Use Principles. Table 5-2 below demonstrates the expected 2040 land uses in the community. TABLE 5-2 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN i Future Land Use (2040) Gross Acreage 0/0Net Acreage oh Rural Residential 8,734.5 51.1% 6,476.4 37.9% Agriculture 265.5 1.6 / 204.9 1.2 Future Development Area 396.2 2.3 % 366.7 2.1 Low Density Residential 1,103.7 6.4 % 879.2 5.1 Medium Density Residential 58.3 0.3 % 44.9 0.3 High Density Residential 29.3 0.2 / 26.3 0.2 Mixed Residential 137.0 0.8 / 97.1 0.6 Uptown Hamel 45.0 0.3 / 39.0 0.2 Commercial 247.1 1.4 / 196.0 1.1 Business 716.9 4.2 / 503.0 2.9 Rural Commercial 87.4 0.5 / 59.4 0.3 Institutional 270.0 1.5 / 199.0 1.1 Parks, Recreation, Open Space 3,106.5 18.1 % 2,054.0 12.0 Private Recreation 294.7 1,7/ 260.5 1.5/ Closed Sanitary Landfill 192.1 1.1 / 124.3 0.7/ Right -of -Way_ 673.1 3.9 / 672.4 3.9 Total Acres 16,356.5 12,202.6 Lakes and Open Water 763.5 4.5 / 763.5 4.5 Wetlands and Floodplain 4,153.9 24.3 Total City 17,120.5 17,120.5 The Growth and Development Map (May 5-3) highlights areas within the City in which a change of land use is contemplated by the Future Land Use plan. The map also highlights wetland areas within Medina which significantly affect land planning, development, and infrastructure decisions. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth DRAFT - February 7, 2017 C.Y 0M MEDINA► Page 5- 6 Future Land Use Designations Rural Residential (RR) identifies areas for low -intensity uses, such as rural residential, hobby farms, agricultural, horticulture, conservation of ecologically significant natural resources and passive recreation. Density within the RR land use shall be no more than one lot per 10 acres and the area is not planned to be served by urban services during the timeframe covered by this Plan. Agricultural (AG) identifies areas which are planned for long-term agricultural uses. Density within the land use can be no more than one lot per 40 acres which will not be served by urban services. Property within this land use is eligible to be part of the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program. Future Development Area (FDA) identifies areas which could potentially be planned for future urban development in the City that will be provided municipal sewer and water services. This area will remain rural unless and until designated for urban services in a future Comprehensive Plan update. The purpose of the FDA designation is to communicate the future planning intentions to the community. This designation is tentative and depends greatly on future infrastructure improvements, including to regional highway capacity. Low Density Residential (LDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 2.0 units per acre and 3.0.units per acre which are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary use in this area is single- and two-family residential development. Medium Density Residential (MDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 5.0 and 7.0 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary uses in this designation will be a mix of housing such as single family residential, twin homes, town homes, row homes, and small multiple family buildings. High Density Residential (HDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 12.0 and 15.0 units per acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The primary uses will include town homes, apartment buildings and condominiums which should incorporate some open space or an active park. Mixed Residential (MR) identifies residential land uses developed between 3.5 and 4.0 units per net acre that are served, or are intended to be served, by urban services. The land use provides flexibility for the type of housing developed, including detached single family, twin homes, townhomes and multiple family buildings, provided the overall density of a project falls within the range noted above and provides some higher density housing. Some portion of each site shall be developed at densities over 8.0 units per net acre. At a minimum, each development in the land use shall include one higher density housing unit per net acre, which shall be complemented with open space and recreational activities. Uptown Hamel (UH) the Uptown Hamel land use allows residential and commercial to be mixed on adjacent sites and to be mixed within the same building or property. Residential development in this designation may be between 4.0 and 15.0 units per acre. The mixed -use business areas will be served by urban services. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth DRAFT - February 7, 2017 C.Y 0M MEDINA► Page 5- 7 Commercial (C) provides areas for highway oriented businesses and retail establishments including commercial, office and retail uses. These uses are concentrated along the arterial corridors and are served or will be served by urban services. Business (B) provides opportunities for corporate campus uses including office, warehouse, and light industrial. This designation identifies larger tracts of land that are suitable for office and business park developments and are served or will be served by urban services. Rural Commercial (RC) identifies commercial land uses which are not served by urban services, but rather by individual wells and septic systems. The scale of development in this land use shall be limited in order to protect water resources. Institutional (INST) identifies existing public, semi-public, and non-profit uses such as governmental, cemeteries, religious, educational and utilities. Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) identifies publicly owned or permanently conserved land which is used for park, recreational, or open space purposes. Private Recreation (PREC) identifies areas that are currently used for outdoor recreational uses which are held under private ownership but are not publicly maintained. Limited numbers of residential uses may be included or have previously been developed within this land use designation. Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL) identifies an existing closed sanitary landfill. The land is owned by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) which also has jurisdiction over land use regulations. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth DRAFT - February 7, 2017 C.Y 0M MEDINA► Page 5- 8 Average Net Residential Density The Metropolitan Council has designated the portion of the City within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area as Emerging Suburban Edge. Residential development within the Emerging Surburban Edge designation is required to be planned for new development and redevelopment at average net density of at least 3-5 units per acre. The average net density for planned residential development in Medina is 3.15 units per acre as described in Table 5-3. TABLE 5-3 NET RESIDENTIAL DENSITY Future Land Use Planned Net Acreage Minimum Density Minimum Number of Units Low Density Residential 171.0 2.0 342.0 Medium Density Residential 21.3 5.0 106.5 High Density Residential 13.9 12.0 166.8 Mixed Residential 97.1 3.5 339.9 Total Planned Residential 303.3 955.2 Average Net Residential Density 3.15 Redevelopment is anticipated within the Uptown Hamel area and is likely to include additional residential units. The intent of the Uptown Hamel land use is to permit flexibility in the amount of residential and commercial development and is therefore not projected in Table 5-3. However, residential development within Uptown Hamel is required to exceed 4 units per net acre, which would further compliance with Metropolitan Council minimum net density requirements. Employment Intensity Forecasts The Metropolitan Council requires that communities provide a measurement of forecasted employment. Acceptable measures include floor area ratios, building footprint percentages or impervious surface percentages. Medina anticipates that new development in the Commercial and Business land uses will tend to result in 50-65 impervious surface coverage. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth DRAFT - February 7, 2017 C.Y 0M MEDINA Page 5- 9 Land Use Policies by Area The following section provides policies for land use designations and is categorized into generalized subsections. The policies for each category as provided below directly support the Community Goals and Land Use Principles. These designations are generalized land uses and are not specific zoning districts. The City will update the zoning ordinance and applicable codes to be consistent with the land use plan and designations identified in this section. The planning process revealed a strong interest in promoting high quality, sustainable development in the City. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) process for large scale or master plan types of development, regardless of whether they are residential, commercial or mixed -uses will be available and will be supported through zoning. Rural Designations The rural designations include Agricultural, Rural Residential and Future Development Area. A large percentage of the community falls into these categories. The purpose of these designations is to provide low -intensity land uses, such as rural residential, farming, hobby farms, horticulture, conservation of natural and ecologically significant natural resources and passive recreation. This area will not be provided with water or sewer service during the timeframe covered by this Plan. The City's goal is to maintain the rural character of this area. The Metropolitan Council System Statement shows the majority of this area as Diversified Rural, and the City utilizes the Rural Residential designation to be consistent with the System Statement. A significant segment of this area consists of large, rural parcels with single-family homes. The City recognizes that such low -density, development will continue to be a desired housing alternative. The City's Open Space Report proposes several different implementation techniques for allowing open space development and planning to maintain rural character and simultaneously preserve significant natural resources. This result may take the form of innovative developments that clusters smaller lots on larger parcels with permanently conserved open space. Such innovative arrangements can help preserve the City's natural resources, open space and rural character, while still maintaining an average overall density of ten acres per unit. Medina's wetlands, lakes, scattered woodlands and soil conditions prevent smaller, unsewered lot development, but are ideal for low -density rural housing. Medina's policy in the permanent rural area is to keep strict soil requirements for septic sites, but allow flexibility for Open Space design developments and to ensure that the permanent rural area will remain rural by eliminating the need for future extension of a sanitary sewer service to replace failing systems. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth DRAFT - February 7, 2017 C.Y 0M MEDINA Page 5- 10 Objectives: 1. Allow low -density development in the Rural Residential Area including innovative arrangements of homes that preserve open space and natural resources. 2. Encourage conservation of open space, farms and ecologically significant natural resources in the rural areas. 3. Enforce stringent standards for the installation and maintenance of permanent, on -site sewage disposal systems. 4. Allow public facilities and services, such as parks and trail systems, if compatible with rural service area development. 5. Allow land uses, such as home -based businesses, hobby farms, horse stables, nurseries and other smaller -scale rural activities, which will not conflict with adjoining residential development. 6. Regulate noise, illumination, animals, and odors as needed to maintain public health and safety. 7. Maintain a maximum density of one unit per forty acres for property in the Agricultural land use. 8. Maintain a maximum density of one unit per ten acres for new development in the Rural Residential and Future Development Area land use. 9. Consider exceptions to maximum density standards for open space developments that protect natural features and put land into permanent conservation. 10. Urban services will not be provided to the Agricultural, Rural Residential, or Future Development Area land uses during this planning cycle. 11. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands and other significant natural characteristics. 12. Require that lots contain adequate soil types and conditions as defined in the City's on -site septic system requirements. 13. Protect property within the Future Development Area designation from subdivision and development by requiring ghost plats for subdivisions so that future urban expansion is not compromised. 14. Reduce impervious surfaces where possible by applying low impact design standards and encourage innovative materials and plans that reduce runoff. 15. Encourage and incentivize landowners to participate in the protection and conservation of significant natural resources. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth DRAFT - February 7, 2017 C.Y 0M MEDINA► Page 5- 11 Urban Service Designations The Urban Service Area includes the residential and commercial areas of the City that are currently or will be served by municipal water and sewer services. Residential Uses Objectives: 1. Require preservation of natural slopes, wetlands, woodlands, and other significant natural characteristics of the property. 2. Consider exceptions to or modifications of density restrictions for developments that protect the natural features or exceed other standards of the zoning district. 3. Restrict urban development to properties within the sewer service boundary. 4. Encourage green building practices such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) principles in neighborhood planning and residential building and low impact development design standards. 5. Regulate the rate and location of development in keeping with availability of public facilities and the City's stated goals, including the undesignated MUSA and growth strategies. 6. Restrict commercial and business development to areas designated in this Plan. 7. Protect property within the City's MUSA boundary from development prior to the provision of urban services that will hinder future division. 8. Create flexible zoning standards that would allow for innovative arrangements of homes, conservation easements, or other creative land use concepts that preserve the City's open space and natural features. 9. Promote attractive, well -maintained dwellings on functional, clearly marked roads, with adequate facilities and open space. 10. Emphasize resident and pedestrian safety. 11. Encourage a controlled mix of densities, housing types, age groups, economic levels, lot sizes, and living styles that are of appropriate scale and consistent with appropriate land use, market demands, and development standards. 12. Establish design criteria for platting and developing site plans which will be compatible with surrounding physical features, existing land uses and the preservation of ecologically significant natural resources. 13. Establish standards for higher density residential development so that such development is compatible with surrounding uses. Such standards may include enclosed parking, green space, landscape buffering and height limitations. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth DRAFT - February 7, 2017 C.Y 0M MEDINA► Page 5- 12 14. Require utilities to be placed underground wherever possible for reasons of aesthetic enhancement and safety. 15. Plan interconnections between separate developments to encourage shared road use to reduce costs and minimize the amount of road surface required. 16. Require planning of trails and walkway systems in the early design stages of all new development so that residential areas are provided safe access to parks and open space. 17. In urban residential zones with sanitary sewer service permit higher density in PUD's in exchange for (1) reduced land coverage by buildings, (2) provision of more multi -family units; and, (3) sensitive treatment of natural resources. 18. Implement standards for lot sizes and setbacks which recognize the development characteristics and natural resources of each existing neighborhood. 19. Regulate noise, illumination, and odors as needed to protect residential neighborhoods and to maintain public health and safety. Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth DRAFT - February 7, 2017 C.Y 0M MEDINA► Page 5- 13 Staging Plan The staging plan is tied to infrastructure plans, including water, wastewater and transportation, to ensure that growth and development are commensurate with services necessary to support new residents and businesses in an efficient and cost-effective manner. The staging plan, Map 5-4, utilizes flexible staging boundaries to direct where and when development should proceed within the City and is built on the following principles: • Growth should encompass a balance of land uses to provide residential and business areas for development throughout the planning period. The staging plan also is intended to reduce concentration of development within a location during a particular timeframe. • The staging plan identifies staged increments of 5-year periods and provides some flexibility between adjacent staging periods. Development shall be limited to a maximum of two years prior to the existing staging period, and will be tied to an incentive based points system. Table 5-5, located on the following page, describes the net acreage of the various land uses by Staging Period. The following table describes the corresponding number of residential units which could be developed upon property within each Staging Period. Although most of the property staged for development is available in earlier timeframes, the City anticipates that actual growth will be more linear as described in the forecasts in Chapter 3. TABLE 5-4 STAGING PLAN — RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY Time Period Total Residential A Units High Density Residential Units 2018-2020 343 161 2020-2025 94 2025-2030 469 95 2030-2035 0 2035-2040 48 Total 955 256 Chapter 5 - Land Use & Growth DRAFT - February 7, 2017 C.Y 0M MEDINA► Page 5- 17 81 -S abod VNICIMAI O A 1 4 L 1OZ 'L /uonagad — ldb?Ja 1-11nA0a0 8 ash puo1 - S aaIdpy3 t'ZL9 0'0 t'ZL9 0'0 t'ZL9 0'0 t'ZL9 0'0 t'ZL9 0'0 t'ZL9 kem-3o-N2IN £'17ZI 0'0 £'tZZ 0'0 £'tZI 0'0 £'tZI 0'0 £'tZI 0'0 £'tZI IIT3pur7 klulTurs pasoD S'09Z 0'0 S'09Z 0'0 S'09Z 0'0 S'09Z 0'0 S'09Z 0'0 S'09Z uoRraaaag alexpd O'f7SO`Z 0'0 0'17SO`Z 0'0 0'17SO`Z 0'0 O'f7SO'Z 0'0 O'f7SO'Z 0'0 O'f7SO'Z aaeds uadp 'Dag 'sved f t6I 0'0 f t6l 0'0 t'176I 0'0 f t6I 0'0 f t6I 0'0 f t6I TruoRnmsui f 6S 0'0 f 6S 0'0 f 6S 0'0 f 6S 0'0 f 6S 0'0 f 6S maaauzuzoD rang O'EOS 0'0 0'£OS 0'0 O'EOS 0'0 O'EOS Z'ZE 8'0St STOZ 0'9tZ ssauTsng 0'96I 0'0 0'961 0'0 0'96I 0'0 0'96I 0'0 0'96I I'eg 6'ZtI T piaultuoD 0'6£ 0'0 0.6E 0'0 0'6£ 0•0 0'6£ 0'0 0'6£ 0'0 0'6£ pump' umoldn I'L6 0'0 I'L6 0'0 I'L6 I.L6 0'0 0'0 0'0 0.0 0'0 irguapTsag paxm E'9Z 0'0 £'9Z 0'0 E'9Z 0'0 £'9Z 0'0 £'9Z 6.£'I t'ZI repuapTsag klTsuaa OTH 6'tt 0'0 6'tt 0'0 6'tt 0'0 6'tt 0'0 6'tt ''IZ 9'£Z 'sag klTsuaa unmpaw Z'6L8 6'CZ E'SS8 0'0 £'SS8 I'5'9 Z'06L S'LP 67T7L L.ff' Z'80L IuTluaPIsag X-Tsuaa MOZ L'99£ 6TZ- 9'06£ 0'0 9.06E Z'Z9I- 87SS 9'66- £799 8'LZ£- I'086 raw •doianaa aanind 6TOZ 0'0 6'170Z 0'0 6'T7OZ 0'0 6'T7OZ 0'0 6'T7OZ 0'0 6'tOZ aiminDp2v 0'I8t`9 0'0 0'I8f`9 0'0 0'I8t`9 0'0 0'I8t'9 0'0 0'I8f'9 0'0 0'I8T`9 irguapTsag rang ObOZ OPOZ-SsoZ axunu� 5£0Z SCOZ-OCH axuvio 0£OZ OCOZ-STOZ axunto SZOZ sZOZ-OZN axunu� OZOZ �OZOZ-LLOZ axunto LIOZ $ upsIx3 asn purl azn}n3 3 V3110V 13N - NVld JNI VIS S-S 318V1 ACKAMORE RD 01■IMI .4110 ur/, ,anml: -_ 1..„. 40... ---4'flaw 707.0 r Y • ir ` • dat fil 1 `-',, - sir a MY II 1113--; Zara iii,NAmiM_IZI111:: il, — - .■ �ahR -.9/ INA _ `.4rf MUM � il�lift rrIi I ajar L K. wz+1 t-INOIL ...FA r!. MEDINA Map 5-1 2016 Existing Land Uses DRAFT 01 /2 6/2 017 Legend Agricultural Rural Residential Single Family Detached Single Family Attached - Multifamily - Mixed Use Residential _ Retail and Other Commercial Office J Industrial and Utility Institutitional Park, Recreational, or Preserve Golf Course A Major Highway Railway Open Water Undeveloped Wetland Locations Map Date: January 26, 2017 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles MEDINA Map 5-2 Future Land Use Plan DRAFT 1 /31 /2017 Legend Future Land Use Rural Residential - Agricultural Future Development Area Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential - High Density Residential Mixed Residential Uptown Hamel Commercial Business Rural Commercial Institutional Private Recreational Park, Recreational, and Open Space Closed Sanitary Landfill A Map Date: January 31, 2017 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles r- MEDINA Map 5-3 Development and Growth Plan DRAFT 12/8/2016 Legend Future Land Use Rural Residential Agricultural Future Development Area Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Residential Uptown Hamel Commercial Business Rural Commercial Institutional Private Recreational Park, Recreational, and Open Space Closed Sanitary Landfill Wetland Locations Wetland Locations Map Date: January 20, 2016 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles F rdmor= Half Moon Independence Academy Marsh Katrina Unnamed re -Thas=1.11.11 �uu uMu�u��uu�n•1uu�u•uMuM�uu�uM1ui1MnMu�u� O Winterhalter �c<‘ Peter Unnamed Unnamed School J J 7—\ CHIPPEWA RD Unnamed 0 Thies O J J Medina ° I 1 ry, I Q■ HAMEL RD� Wolsfeld Nr i 11§ ACKAMORE RD named Holy Name UNTER uumumnmtt \,miumummic- amumu= NIIMI iuMnNIuM1n•u•non•u•u•u•uv1•u•u111u•u•u11•u•u`u•uMumumumumumumuMuMI 101 G t T Y � A Y � MEDINA Map 5-4 Staging and Growth DRAFT 11 /15/2016 Urban Services Phasing Plan Existing Service Area (2017) - 2018 2020 2025 2030 2035 Future Development Area (post 2040) Long-term Sewer Service Area /A The Staging and Growth Plan allows potential flexibility for urban services up to two years prior to the indicated staging period. Such flexiblity will be considered through a evaluation system based on the extent to which a proposal exceeds general City standards. The Future Development Area identifies areas which may potentially be planned for urban services in the future beyond the term of this plan (post-2040). The Long-term Sewer Service Area is a long-term planning designation of the Metropolitan Council. It identifies areas which may be considered for potential sanitary sewer service in the future beyond the term of this Plan. Map Date: January 20, 2017 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles Brindle Path Project Narrative The Excelsior Group proposes Brindle Path, a 40-acre Single Family Low Density Residential subdivision for the City of Medina. The thoughtful development creates a community that is mindful of the vision and goals of the city Medina, and creates a thoughtful transition between more intensive uses to the south and east and rural residential to the north and west. Location The Site is located on Chippewa Road, West of Mohawk Drive. The project is directly west of the Wealshire memory care facility, directly north of Polaris Headquarters, and northeast of the proposed Lunski Senior Housing Development. General Description of Request The 2 properties that comprise Brindle Path are designated as Low Density Residential (LDR) in the current Comprehensive Plan and the same on the draft Comprehensive Plan. Originally the properties were included in the 2016-2020 Phasing Plan. This Phasing Plan was amended in early 2015 pushing these properties to the 2021-2025 Phasing Plan. This request is for the council to exercise the Phasing Plan flexibility provided in chapter 5 of the Comprehensive Plan. This flexibility allows the Phasing Plan to be pulled forward 2 years. In this instance, Certificates of Occupancy can be granted in 2019, allowing development in 2018. Housing The proposed Brindle Path contains 68 total lots. 40 lots will be customary single family lots that meet the Rl zoning (minimum 90 feet wide and 11,000 se. The remaining 28 lots are proposed as single family "Villa" lots. The homes on these lots will be single level living geared towards empty nesters. The developer is requesting lot size flexibility (minimum 65 feet wide and 7,000 sfl so that these lots will conform to the expectations of the target market of the villa homes. However, in keeping with comments regarding previous submittals, the 28 villa lots are internal to the development or adjacent to the Wealshire. Therefore none of the villa lots will abut any rural residential lot, but instead all of the lots adjacent to rural residential meet the R1 zoning standards. Parks, Trails & Open Spaces Brindle Path will include sidewalks on all streets. These sidewalks will link to the trail system that runs throughout the development. The trails will connect to the centrally located park and provide opportunities for passive recreation among the wetlands and open space within the development. The trails are planned to provide opportunities to connect to the Wealshire, Polaris and the planned Lunski Senior Housing Development. The park at the center of the development is planned as a city park and is large enough to provide an area for playground equipment, open play and walking, and a multi -use soccer/football field. This field can become the "home" field for Brindle Path and the existing neighborhoods to the northeast. Infrastructure Sewer All of Brindle Path can be served via gravity to the existing sewer at the intersection of Chippewa Road and Mohawk Drive Water Brindle Path will utilize existing watermain in Chippewa Road. The development of Brindle Path will allow the watermain serving the Wealshire to be looped to the watermain on Chippewa Road. Further looping of the watermain can be accomplished by connecting to the watermain serving the proposed Lunski Senior Housing Development that comes from the south. Streets Brindle Path will access Chippewa Road approximately at the location of the existing driveway. Vehicles from Brindle Path will travel a short distance on the city streets (Chippewa Road and Mohawk Drive), before accessing State Highway 55. Phasing Plan Flexibility Specifics The Brindle Path concept plan has been in front of the Planning Commission, City Council and Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee several times over the past 18 months. Although there has been lively discussion over various components of the plan there seems to be consensus that development in the proposed location makes sense. The steering committee recommended, and the Council accepted, that the property be guided Low Density Residential (LDR) in the new 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The rationale for keeping the property designated as LDR in the future Comprehensive Plan was the area was easily served by existing infrastructure and created a nice transition from more intensive uses (Wealshire and Polaris) to the less intensive rural residential uses to the north and west. This reasoning is even more appropriate considering the proposed Lunski Senior Housing Development. Brindle Path now fills the hole between these 3 projects not only in terms of transitional uses, but also linking infrastructure (watermain, trails, parks, etc.). The proposed project meets or exceeds the factors necessary to allow Staging Plan Flexibility. 1. Crucial Factor: Infrastructure Capacity — The entirety of the project can be served with existing infrastructure located in Chippewa Road. Perhaps more importantly, the project can serve as a bridge between the newly constructed Wealshire on the east side of the property and the proposed Lunski Senior Housing Development to the southwest. This will allow important watermain and trail connections. 2. Primary Factors (10 points per item) — a. Sustainability — Houses within Brindle Path will incorporate sustainable practices including high energy efficient, and environmentally responsible construction materials. The location of Brindle Path creates possibilities for a live/work environment to be created with Polaris headquarters to the south, the Wealshire memory care facility to the east, and the proposed Lunski Senior Housing Development to the southwest. With 240+ senior housing units on the adjacent properties, the Villas at Brindle Path will create opportunities for elderly residents who are healthy and active to live very near a more frail spouse who requires the services of either of the adjacent senior housing facilities. The synergy between the 3 projects will allow active Medina residents to stay in Medina, as they will have a senior campus environment. Historically seniors looking to move to an active adult community desire that future housing with services options are located very nearby so they don't have to reacclimate to a new community as they become more frail and require housing with services. In addition, it will provide opportunities for Medina families to relocate more frail parents/grandparents nearby. b. Natural resource protection and low impact development — Brindle Path will use a storm water re -use infiltration system to re -use storm water runoff to irrigate. This reduces groundwater use while also providing superior stormwater treatment. The Project will exceed the tree preservation ordinance by adding at least 2 trees to each finished lot. The project will meet all wetland protection regulations, with very little wetland impacts, with plans to put conservation easements over wetlands to ensure their protection and preservation in the future. c. Proximity to existing development — Brindle Path is directly adjacent to the Wealshire memory care facility, and northeast of the proposed Lunski Senior Housing Development. It is also directly north of Polaris Headquarters. All three of these developments utilize city services. d. Open Space Protection — Wetlands and open space within Brindle Path will be preserved in perpetuity by use of a conservation easement. This includes the addition of 40,000 sf of new wetlands. The proposed development includes a 5-acre city park and trail network that will act as a bridge between the Wealshire, Polaris, and Lunski projects, providing intergenerational recreational opportunities and connectivity. e. Limited impacts on city services - Residents of Brindle Path will use approximately i/z mile of city streets to access State Highway 55. This is very limited impact to the city roadways. Furthermore, the storm water re -use for irrigation of the development will limit the impact on the amount of city water consumed by the development. 3. Secondary Factors (maximum of 5 points per item) a. High quality architectural design and materials — Brindle Path is proposed to have 2-3 local builders to ensure a variety of housing styles and designs. To maintain neighborhood consistency, a Homeowners Association(HOA) and Architectural Review Committee (ARC) will be implemented. The ARC will oversee and enforce high quality of design and materials. The ARC will ensure varying types of home design throughout the community and the use of quality materials including brick and stone. b. Community amenities — Brindle Path will include a park and a trail system, which will connect residents both inside and outside of the neighborhood, and take advantage of the natural environment. As discussed previously, the development will include a 5+ acre city park, big enough to include playground equipment and a soccer/football field, providing a "home" field for Brindle Path and the existing neighborhoods in the northeast. The trail system provides connectivity to the Wealshire, Polaris, and Lunski projects and the city park. c. Affordable Housing — the two different product types, while they may not necessarily meet the Metropolitan Council's definitions of affordable, do meet the City's Housing Objective of "providing opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of costs to support residents at all stages of their lives." 4. Employment Opportunities — Brindle Path is a single family residential development; thus, there will not necessarily be jobs created by the homes, but this community has the potential to provide a live/work environment for employees of the neighboring senior housing facilities and Polaris Headquarters. _. 1 r- \1 DRAWING NAME NO. V6.0 DRAWN BY RSM CHECKED BY DATE 07/27/17 \ I 1 - \ PROPOSED II ` . WATERMAIN I CONNECTION\ `\II \\1 1 I PROPOSED MEDINA,6ENI0R I LIVI�JG COMMUNILY ; PROPOSED ATERMAY CONNECT! I 1 1\\ I I -'I Parcel Data - Address 2212 Chippewa Road PID 03-118-23-23-0005 Area: 19.53 acres (850,549 sf) SroRn wATVZ IRFArn€n+r PONO,1 /-20,60.05P) CHIPPEWA )RVAD Description: The East 655.53 ft of the SW a of the NW 1/4 USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. PAO: / OVFIJ,,PIKF 05/ ' Purr 1 L-o wdlandc,Edion l /-400000 1- IVA' 11 C f SJU ArrA I 'O s ;ern-y ri, Rlrg "\, Ale WATERMAIN STUB \ RLISEX BASEMENT PARNI SE.ACn nvI \._ _ _ _ _ \I __.__ 10 ' //1 1 / i / 1 ;I trEa O BOUNDARY / tUTURE DEVELOPMENT TAL Iw,� •I 1 I N II - lY�-i / Ri v ln.lM4Nl • \ f -- CllIPPEW4 ROAD ------' Parcel Data - Address 2120 Chippewa Road PID 03-118-23-24-0002 Area: 17.62 acres (767,549 sf) Description: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Name, P.E. Date: ___,- \ 1 ` I ND 200 100 0 100 200 400 41`1i `J��� SCALE IN FEET 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA Proposed Design Data: 40 Lots R1 Zoning Min Width - 90 ft Min Area - 11,000 sf Fysb - 251/30'g Sysb - 10' min/25' total Crnr - 25' Rysb - 20' open/30' 50' ROW 28' B-B Streets Concept Plan - R1 / PUD BRINDLE PATH THE EXCELSIOR GROUP Proposed Design Data: 28 Lots PUD Zoning Min Width - 65 ft Min Area - 7,000 sf Fysb - 25'I/30'g Sysb - 7' min/14' total Crnr - 20' Rysb - 20' FILE NO. 24958-002 PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER WETLAND :7 ��z s( zooEg e(') (I( ( w OPEN d 7 SPACE +/-41,278 SF y1 W (0.95 acres) J V (�I WETLAND#' \ w +/-36,680 SF (0.84 acres) OPEN SPACE 4/ 48,899 SF (1.12 acres) ��, 90' LOTS +/-556,255 SF (12.77 acres) 5TOVI W1TC2'I 7RPitrrirnir POW, ki I L/ / ROW938 +/ SF / (4-201,.64 acres) 0 65' LOTS +/-292,427 SF (6.71 acres) r 1 OPEN / SPACE SF W w w W + 3.69 acres) s) I/ w - (369 e ) ../G UPLAND \ (111, PARK W�, +/-59,4815E P �' W W ,( W (1.37 acres) I� 6W � +WETLAND#2 W ' �v,,VI V l39 888 9F W W �� \ C � W W (092 acre) PARKING ' ' W / /-2,2aer81 SF W/ (0.05 es) �',���IID����� �jr------ n\r/-trevrTORfi // �Np xIF le ��yi/Oiiii\ r /����� �Q 7 /' i �` -``/ OACE / ` +/-230,022 SF /�//`�\ Y1 `` (5.28 acres) �\`\`````` • r WETLAND -1,008 SF (0.02 acres) CHIPPEWA ROAD to WETLAND 418,700 SE (0.43 acres) T z r- 7` .70 .we. we WAX CONNECMON r•' 4'00\' 200 100 0 100 200 400 SCALE IN FEET AREAS ROW - +/- 201,938 SF (4.64 ACRES) /// 65' RESIDENTIAL LOTS - +/- 292,427 SF (6.71 ACRES) 90' RESIDENTIAL LOTS - +/- 556,255 SF (12.77 ACRES) OPEN SPACE - +/- 507,995 SF (11.66 ACRES) (27,017+41,278+48,899+160,779+230,022) UPLAND PARK - +/- 59,481 SF (1.37 ACRES) WETLAND - +/- 109,326 SF (2.51 ACRES) (36,680+39,888+14,058+18,700) PARKING - +/- 2,281 SF (0.05 ACRES) TOTAL SITE AREA - +/- 1,618,098 SF (37.15 ACRES) GROSS DENSITY 68 lots / 37.15 acres = 1.83 lots/acre NET DENSITY (total area - wetland area - upland park) 37.15 - 2.51 - 1.37 = 33.27 acres 68 lots / 33.27 acres = 2.04 lots/acre DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS V6.0 DRAWN BY RSM CHECKED BY XXX DATE 01/13/16 USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Name, P.E. Date: Lic. No SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA AREA EXHIBIT BRINDLE PATH THE EXCELSIOR GROUP FILE NO. 24958-002 X \ \'10 _ - 1006 - -1002- / / 1 I 1 0 I / 8" PVC SDR 35 57.0 Lq®0.53% 1 / / \ PROPOSED II WATERMAIN \ CONNECTIONvv ILI II- -- m MH Structure - (64) 1 / RIM: 10109 / INV: 999.4 17 BLD: 166' /I \ / I III / I\9 y/e ion \\\ I\lo / \ / MH Structur -(45) - RIM:1009.0 NV: 998.8 i \ BLD:102' \ 1 \ ,.7 MH Structure - (46) RIM: 1009.0 V 999 3 BLD10 7 �7 MH Structure - (75) RIM: 1009.0 l 70O0 INV: 993.3 \ I / \\ BLD: 15.T \�. / \ so \ mo,rr MH Structure - (50) RIM: 10040 INV: 994.0 BLD: 12 I0' 1 -- • MH SVucture (51) \ RIM: 1007,0 \ INV: 993.7 BLD: 13.3' [PEAT l7rNT PONO #1 C+/20,669 5P) 99a: -- . * * r�l� / \ \v�l/ \I/ \I/ \ \� sV ,I, W vI/ V/ MH Structure -(47) RIM: 92 9.6 ▪ y INV: 926 / MH SNtVructure -0 62) RM1011. f BLD: 11.0' - - I 1 1 �C MH Structure - (74) RIM: 9921 INV: 992\ UOD MH Structure - (73) . RIM: 1003.0 BLD: 15.9' INV:930' ` BLD_ 9 0' _ \ \ / MH Structure - (48) / RIM: 1006.0 \ / INV: 989,2 99. l SF01:71W,97-E. 'EA'(P7ENTP0N. :7_ I 74-75F I MH Structure - (59 RIM 1004,0 INV: 989.5 BLD: 14.5' MH Structure - (95) RIM: 1001.2 BLD: 19.2' CHIPPEWA'PO \ /- \\o ) ' \ \ %/ \\ \ \ \ \ �\ \ \ \ I 1 \ \ MH Structure - (49) I \ RIM: 1004.0 \ INV:988.8 I / - BLD, 15.2' / o I I / ill 1 II 1' s5.o 1 ' I / o / / •ema 1 _ � PAP( / // PLAY Fl LD / 1 MH Structure - (58) RIM: 1002.0 INV: 991.0 \ BLD: 11.0' MH Structure - (55) RIM: 1005.0 INV: 994.4 BLD: 10.6' / MIT shuEture-(56). V RIM: 1004.0 INV: 992.0 BLD: 12.0' OPEN5PAC1= 5,05 40Pf / / MH Structure -(57) RIM: 1002.0 INV: 991.5 BLD: 0.5' /_-_--� / \ \ / \ / // I �o` 1 / / 1 / / 1 / / „-.996-__\ / ' / / / / I / / I / / I - - 1 / \ 4'0 RIO' 200 100 0 100 200 400 411`1i �11III SCALE IN FEET HYD MH Structure (541 RIM 1006.0 1I INV: 994,9 I � BLD. 111 ro / ---- \ 1 "--1 / i.1 I\' \ \\ / \ a \ / \ me '5 1 >1 5TOPl7 WATEP 7TPATPeNT POND #lr 5V) MH Structure.(37) RIM: 991.8 INV: 979.4 BLD: 12.4' 1 II ST, �rMH -I9921 -II 25 POSSIBLE FUTURE TRAIL CONNECTION gg01- I I r1 / II �I 10' DRAAAGE UTILITY EASE!. 0.00' `/ DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS. V6.0 DRAWN BY RSM CHECKED BY MO( DATE k 01/13/16 USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Name, P.E. Date: Lis. No. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA Concept Plan - UTILITY BRINDLE PATH THE EXCELSIOR GROUP FILE NO. 24958-002 UP1 X PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER / / 1016- - - - - / \ a \ \- I°70 i - - 1006 _ - -1002- nIy W V✓/ \iv V �9 % / u /• a MH Structure - (42) / RIM:1013.0 INV:1001.0 BLD: 12.0' / \\ / MH Structure - (43) //Q x \ RIM: 1012.0 //rS' \ INV: 1000.5 , / \BLD: 11.5' / // / MH Structure - (44) RIM:1011.0 / INV: 1000.0 / BLD: 11.0' I / I I I \ I I \m MH Structure - (64) RIM: 1010.0 / / INV: 999.4 / BLD: 10.6' // I. / /' I \(Ir i \- / \ I // \/ / \\ / � MH Structure--(45) - / RIM:1009.0 \ - NV:998.8 / , BLD: 10.2' \,V 'i -- \ /�/Af Air (.4,...- MH Structure- (46) ket.\\N \\\` ` 6 p991j93\ DRAWING NAME NO. V6.0 DRAWN BY BY RSM CHECKED BY 100( DATE 01/13/16 \ I \ // - \\ \- I s. / - -\ / \ \ 1 I I I --� ---- / \ \ ,4m� / \ w,.,„v \ \,., / \ / \ \ - \' --00 T \\ice -MRM1tu0re4-.(41\- imp INV:5 �i \ BLD: 12.5 „,,,,, \ \ - /10/6_ - - ,C4 \\ MH Structure - (76) 1 _ 89.9 \ RIM:1014.5 1/ \ INV:1002.5 p BLD: 12.0' /I \ --� \ 10 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\/ \ \ \\ \ \\ \� \\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \. - ------------- \ l I �- \ \ 0/6,1 \ \ 1 11 / ) I \ \ \ \ / I v v, v \ \ I 1 ▪ \\ \ \ \ I_ "... a v :ha 7 v \ 11 11 _ MH SW lure - (72) �' / RIM: 1014.0 / INV: 998.4 BLD: 75.6' \ / I 90.0 90 } A- I / I It / \MH Structure - (67) / RIM:1010.0 / INV: 997.4 BLD: 12.6' }- c \ 1 / STOR 9 WATE1' 7WEATIMENT POND #/ - i+/-Z0,669 5F% /T. sP st! 4/ 4 `st. \4- \ /4-. USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. MH Structure - (61) RIM:1012.3 INV: 999.2 BLD: 13.1' \ 1 // //\r /`' / )s\ / / 9/ I / \ / 11/1H Structure - (62) RIM: 1011.0 INV:1000.0 _�_ BLD: 11.0' / 000 - OPDNSpACf / /' / / / / // / PLAY rr%LD / • / / • I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Name, P.E. Date: Lis. No. 200 100 0 100 200 400 ��`�i �EIONEi SCALE IN FEET �EFiS SR4 w°N SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. �� M1 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 c?" 01 / / _1 i'\\I - ' \ -IMH9Vucture-(53)\ N/ RIM: 10090 \� ,,\ INV: 996.6 `,e \ - - - - BLD:12.4' \ zamed \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ / I I- - - 10.00' MH Structure - (55) RIM: 1005.0 INV: 994.4 BLD: 10.6' 4.141 MH St�VEture-(56). v° RIM: 1004..0 �+� INV: 892.0 ��� eLD:1a.9•- CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA MH Structure - (54) RIM: 1006.0 INV: 994.9 BLD: 11.1' ro C ▪ Lom / //WATEf3MAI-ro STUB- \ o \ o \ \ 11. �\ v /1 \` -�/ 11 ---_� l T---- /' 7101-I -- / t ISB-17 t 111 w A �� I STMW N - -- 19921 25' I POSSIBLE FUTURE TRAIL CONNECTION Concept Plan - UTILITY BRINDLE PATH THE EXCELSIOR GROUP FILE NO. 24958-002 U P2 X PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: September 14, 2017 MEETING: September 19, 2017 City Council SUBJ: Wally and Bridget Marx — 2700-2900 Parkview Drive — Conservation Design Subdivision PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat Review Deadline Application Received: May 12, 2017 Review Deadline (extended by applicant): October 31, 2017 Overview Wally and Bridget Marx have requested review of a PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat for a Conservation Design subdivision at their property at 2700-2900 Parkview Drive. The applicant proposes to divide three lots totaling 89.75 acres into six single-family residential lots and proposes to place 69.61 (11.76 acres buildable) into conservation easements. The subject properties are located on Parkview Drive, southwest of School Lake and east of the Baker National Golf Course. A significant portion of the property is either wetlands or located under the high-water level of School Lake. The large wetland in the southwest portion of the site is identified as a moderate quality tamarack swamp and black ash swamp in the City's Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) data. The MLCCS identifies a moderate quality maple -basswood forest between this wetland and Parkview Drive, and then extending though the center of the site. Another portion of moderate -quality maple -basswood forest extends onto the property on the southeast of the site. An aerial of the site can be found on the following page. The Conservation Design Planned Unit Development (CD-PUD) district is an overlay district which provides an applicant an option to permanently preserve portions of a property in by providing incentives to develop the property consistent with the conservation objectives of the City rather than conventional development following the standard zoning regulations. The ordinance allows the City to grant flexibility to the underlying zoning regulations in order to encourage property owners to protect natural resources and open space with conservation easements. Flexibility can include density bonuses, reduced setbacks and lot size requirements, and flexibility to park dedication or septic regulations. Flexibility can also be considered for upland buffer and tree preservation regulations on specific lots in the interests of protecting natural resources more broadly on the site. The City recently adopted an amendment to the CD-PUD ordinance, which is attached for reference. Most notably, the ordinance now requires a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres for rural CD-PUD requests. The applicant needed to adjust Lot 3 in order to meet this standard (reducing the adjacent conservation area). The applicant reduced the size of a few of the other lots in the proposal (and increased the size of the adjacent conservation area) to keep the area of conservation the same as reviewed by the Planning Commission. Wally Marx Page 1 of 11 September 19, 2017 CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting The City reviewed the applicant's PUD Concept Plan earlier in the year. Excerpts from the Planning Commission and City Council review are attached for reference. The primary changes from the Concept Plan are: 1) Lot 4 driveway was shifted to reduce wetland impacts 2) A looped public trail is proposed along private road, into the maple -basswood forest and providing a view of School Lake. This trail is kept separate from the private horse trail. 3) Potential house locations were adjusted to meet setbacks from exterior of the site. 4) Applicant is proposing for individual owners to own the Outlots containing the Conservation Area (rather than an association of owners). 5) The applicant is proposing to remove some existing invasive and pioneer tree species with native tree species. School Lake ap sswood forest (moderate quality amarack and black ash swamp (good quality) Legend °posed Driveway Proposed Trail Type Homesite Septic Site Buildable Conservation Area Proposed Conservation Area The aerial above identifies the proposed location for homesites, septic systems, and driveways. Staff believes it is helpful to see these items in connection with the aerial. The proposed conservation areas are shown in purple. In addition to comments from the Commission and City Council, staff had provided the following comments on the Concept Plan. A brief summary of whether the comment has been addressed follows in italics: Wally Marx CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 11 September 19, 2017 City Council Meeting 1) Consider relocating some of the septic sites for lots 3 and 4 in order to provide improved connectivity and to preserve wooded area. No changes were made to the proposed septic location for lots 3 and 4. The applicant did remove the driveway for Lot 3 in order to preserve more of the wooded area. 2) Include conservation areas within outlots in order to ensure improved long term enforcement of conservation easements. Conservation areas are included within outlots, but the outlots are proposed to be owned by individual lot owners rather than an association. 3) Consider adding secondary septic site locations to conservation areas, even if left within the private lots. All septic locations are proposed within lots. 4) Maintain minimum setback distances from development site perimeter. The potential house site of Lot 2 would need to be adjusted to meet this requirement. The potential location was adjusted. 5) Provide trail connection to conservation areas available to the public. A trail is proposed along the driveway and to loop in the conservation area, and a second corridor is proposed along the south edge of the development to connect between Parkview Drive and the eastern edge of property. 6) Any future submittal should address the comments of the City Engineer, City Fire Marshal, Hennepin County, and Minnehaha Creek Watershed. Comments will be provided for this review as well. Site Design Process The CD-PUD ordinance describes a four -step "Site Design Process" which is supposed to influence the site plan. The process is described within the ordinance attached, but is summarized as follows. Also following is a summary from the applicant's site design process, which is described more in-depth within the narrative. This summary helps explain the various colors on the applicant's concept plan. Step 1 — Identify Conservation Areas. This step includes first identifying "unbuildable areas" (shown in green, and dark and light blue in the applicant's plans) and then identifying Conservation Areas which are buildable (shown in yellow in the applicant's plans). The remaining land is potentially buildable land area (shown in grey in the applicant's plans). Step 2 — Locate Housing Sites. Sites should be located in relation to views and buildable land areas. The sites are shown as boxes with an "X" on the applicant's plans. Step 3 — Align streets and trails. Streets are shown in brown on the applicant's plans. Trails are shown but further discussion is needed with the applicant for access from Parkview Drive to the trails and possible realignment of proposed trail. Step 4 — Draw lot lines. Proposed lot lines provide for the six lots, outlots, and conservation areas. Wally Marx Page 3 of 11 September 19, 2017 CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting Conservation Obiectives and Determining Flexibility The CD-PUD process allows the City to grant flexibility to the underlying zoning regulations as an incentive to permanently conserve natural resources and open space. According to the CD- PUD ordinance, the City has the full discretion to determine how much flexibility to grant based "the amount and quality of Conservation Area protected, the public access to or enjoyment thereof, and how well the project achieves the following conservation objectives over and above that achievable under conventional development: a) Parcels with opportunities to achieve the following primary conservation objectives will be given higher consideration for flexibility from performance standards. (1) The protection and/or restoration of the ecological function of native hardwood forests (e.g. Maple -Basswood Forest). (2) The protection and preservation of lakes, streams and wetlands beyond existing regulatory requirements. (3) The protection, restoration, and/or creation of moderate to high quality ecological resources including the sensitive ecological resources identified as priority areas on the Composite Map of the Open Space Report as updated from time to time. (4) The reservation of land connecting aquatic and terrestrial ecological resources to restore and/or create new ecological resources suitable for habitat movement corridors. (5) The reservation of land for incorporating public and private trails in order to create connections to existing or planned trails as identified in the current Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan. (b) Parcels with opportunities to achieve the following secondary conservation objectives may be given consideration for flexibility from performance standards: (1) The protection of scenic views and viewsheds including the views from roads identified as "Scenic Roads" on the Scenic Roads Map of the Open Space Report as updated from time to time. (2) The reservation of land for incorporating public and /or private Open Space in order to achieve goals as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant describes in their narrative how they believe these objectives are met. The applicant proposes 70 acres of conservation area, 11.84 acres of which is classified as buildable under the ordinance. An additional 3-acres of steep slopes are included in the Conservation Area which are not considered buildable. However, staff believes these areas deserve more consideration than wetlands because steep slopes are not protected under existing regulations. The primary area of preservation which is beyond that required by standard wetland regulations and setback requirements is a 10-acre area east and west of Lot 3. The area west of Lot 3 includes the maple -basswood forest remnant referenced in the applicant's forester's report. In addition, two acres of the School Lake lakeshore are conserved which is beyond the general regulations. Approximately 50 acres of the Conservation Area includes wetland areas, areas within School Lake or within the setback of Parkview Drive. As previously noted, the property does include a moderate quality maple -basswood remnant and good quality tamarack swamp. The forester's report from Hennepin County stated that maintenance of the maple -basswood forest could raise the quality of the area, and the applicant Wally Marx Page 4 of 11 September 19, 2017 CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting has indicated that they intend to propose some removal of invasive/pioneering trees and replacement with native species. The proposed conservation area provides a corridor connection between School Lake and the tamarack swamp in the southern portion of the property. This corridor is located east and west of Lot 3. The corridor is interrupted in narrow locations by the shared driveway for lots 3-6 and the driveway for Lot 4. The septic sites for Lot 4 are also within this corridor. During concept plan review, staff had recommended finding alternative locations for some of these improvements, potentially within Lot 5. The City's natural resource specialist also emphasized attempting to reduce impacts in this area, and suggested the removal of the driveway for Lot 3, and instead having a shared driveway for Lots 3 and 4. The applicant followed this suggestion and how includes a shared driveway. Parkview Drive is not identified as a "Scenic Road", although it appears that the proposed development would generally protect the viewshed from the road nonetheless. Staff believes that only one of the lots would be visible from the road. The applicant proposes a public trail along the shared driveway from Parkview Drive which would loop into the wooded area and provide a view of School Lake. The applicant has also identified an extension of this trail to the east, along the northern side of the large wetland. This corridor would allow for the potential of a future connection if a trail easement is obtained from the property to the east. Staff has raised concerns related to the ability to access the trail as proposed. Staff would recommend some sort or trailhead or other access to the trail. Staff has suggested various options to the applicant. In addition, staff has had discussions with Three Rivers Park about potential connections and trailheads east of the site. The applicant has also shown a private trail along School Lake. The applicant has indicated that they are open to providing access to this trail for property owners around School Lake, but not to the general public. Neighbors along School Lake expressed concern during the concept plan review that opening the existing private trail up to the public will cause significant trespass concerns. The applicant has attempted to address these concerns by leaving it private. The applicant is working with Minnehaha Creek Watershed to potentially hold and enforce the Conservation Easement. Minnehaha Creek holds the easement in the Deer Hill Preserve CD- PUD and the draft easement is fairly similar. The applicant has provided a draft Land Stewardship Plan and Conservation Easement for review. Generally speaking, the Land Stewardship plan calls for very limited restoration or active management on an on -going basis. The Plan describes some removal of invasive trees and replacement with native species. The applicant is proposing that individual homeowners own the Conservation Area adjacent to their property rather than the Conservation Area being held in common by an association. City staff is concerned that this may lead to enforcement and administrative difficulties in the long term. The applicant believes individual ownership will provide more "pride in ownership" and will improve enforcement in the long-term. They suggest it may be difficult to ensure that the owners of Lots 1 and 2, for example, take part in the management of the property on the far east or south of the subdivision, even if they were part of an association that owned the entire conservation area. Wally Marx Page 5 of 11 September 19, 2017 CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting General Performance Standards Minimum Size of Subdivision A CD-PUD subdivision within the Rural Residential zoning district is required to be a minimum of 40 acres in size. The proposed subdivision is approximately 89.75 acres. Required Conservation Area A minimum of 30% of the total Buildable Land Area, or higher depending on the land and opportunities to achieve the City's conservation objectives, is required to be included in the Conservation Area. The applicant proposes 68.48 acres within the conservation area, or 77.3% of the site. Most of this area (staff estimates 49 acres) is wetland or would be within wetland buffers required to be protected by easement under a standard development. Buildable areas consist of 11.85 acres (40.7% of the total buildable area on the property), which exceeds the minimum requirement. Density and Design Flexibility The CD-PUD ordinance allows the City to grant flexibility from standard City requirements. Density/Lot Size/Width The applicant proposes six residential lots. Existing rural residential regulations would not allow further subdivision of the existing three parcels. The CD-PUD ordinance allows the City to grant additional density as an incentive, with the maximum number of lots limited to 2x the base density. During recent discussions, the City Council added a clause stating that "the maximum density bonus will only be granted in exceptional circumstances." 5.48 1.55 32 �r 1611323320002 alb 1611823230005 1-1 I 1.32 .40 1.11823310062 The base density is determined by the standard underlying zoning designation (in this case, 5- acres of contiguous suitable soils per lot). According to Hennepin County Soils data, it appears that there is a six acre contiguous area of suitable soils in the northwest corner of the site and a twelve acre contiguous area of suitable soils in the center of the property (see insert at right). This results in a base density of three parcels. Two times of the base density would equate to a maximum of six lots. The property is currently included in three PIDs. If these three lots are separate lots of record and are buildable, the applicant could not further subdivide the property under current requirements. As such, City wetland buffer and other similar requirements would unlikely be triggered upon the property. A summary of the proposed lot sizes in the subdivision is to the right: Lot Area Lot 1 2.53 acres Lot 2 2.53 acres Lot 3 2.50 acres Lot 4 2.76 acres Lot 5 6.28 acres Lot 6 3.51 acres Wally Mark Page 6 of 11 September 19, 2017 CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting Setbacks The following table summarizes the setback requirements of the proposed CD-PUD district: Proposed RR Standard CD-PUD Requirement Setback from Parkview Dr. 440 feet 50 feet 100 feet Setback from Perimeter 50 feet 50 feet 50 feet Interior structure setback 30 feet 50 feet 30 feet School Lake 172 feet 150 feet 150 feet Subdivision Review Primary/Alternate septic sites Standard City regulations require a primary and alternate septic site to serve each lot. The CD- PUD ordinance permits flexibility for the alternate site to be located within conservation areas. The concept plan shows two septic sites within each proposed lot (although lot 4 requires a good deal of gerrymandering), and none within conservation areas. Staff noted that the septic sites for Lots 3 and 4 are located within the wooded portion of the property, although this portion of the woods does not appear to be part of the maple -basswood forest but is lower quality compared to much of the woods. These sites do interrupt the corridor between School Lake and the tamarack swamp to the south, and it would appear preferable if alternative locations could be found, especially for Lot 4. Shoreland Lot Width Requirement The City's Shoreland ordinance requires a minimum lot width of 200 feet at the ordinary high water level at the 150' structure setback. As proposed, none of the lots are actually adjacent to the lake. The entire lakeshore is included within outlots which would be subject to the conservation area. However, Lots 1-4 each are each proposed to individually own an outlot which is adjacent to the lake. Outlot B does not meet the minimum 200' lot width adjacent to the lake. In discussions with DNR staff, it is possible for the City to submit a PUD with reduced lot width from review to the DNR. The DNR would consider, similar to the consideration the City is making on the CD-PUD, if the proposed PUD protects more of the shoreline than the standard 200 foot width would protect. Staff is awaiting comment from the DNR related to the proposal. Staff s impression is that the lakeshore being entirely subject to a Conservation Easement (although with some allowance for lots 1-4 to access the lake) will likely be seen as positive and doubts the DNR will raise concerns. The subject site has over 1200 feet of lakeshore, so the applicant is proposing fewer lots to front the lake than would be permitted through the standard 200 foot lot width. Woodlands The subject property includes remnants of Maple -Basswood forest which were ranked as moderate quality in the City's natural resources inventory. These areas are identified within the Composite map of the City's Open Space report and protecting the area would be consistent with the first conservation objectives. Wally Marx Page 7 of 11 September 19, 2017 CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting The septic sites and driveways for Lots 3 and 4 as currently proposed, would result in tree removal over an area of approximately 1.6 acres. This area is of a lower quality and includes predominantly boxelder. Preserving more of the area would have benefits in terms of corridor connectivity. These impacts would account for just over 7% of the wooded area of the site. However, these areas tend to be less dense, and the applicant has submitted a tree sample which quantifies the removal necessary for the driveways, which appears to be 0.5%. Removal for septic systems will need to be added to this amount, but appears to be well under 10% of the trees. Wetlands and Floodplains The applicant shifted the driveway location for Lot 4 in order to minimize wetland impacts. The driveway proposes to use an existing field road, so some minimum impacts may occur to widen the driveway. Otherwise, no wetland impacts are proposed. The applicant has shown wetland buffers adjacent to the wetlands on the property which generally exceed City requirements (in order to meet Minnehaha Creek standards). The exception is for the buffer along the wetland south of the proposed shared driveway for lots 3-6. The existing driveway location prevents establishing a buffer with the minimum required width. Staff recommends that the applicant average the width of the buffer along the driveway in order to meet the required average width. Staff would recommend a condition that requisite easements, signage, and vegetation are provided for the buffers. The applicant has also identified floodplain locations adjacent to School Lake and within the Tamarack swamp. No impacts are proposed. Septic setbacks from wetlands All septic sites appear to meet the minimum setback requirement of 75 feet from wetlands and 150 feet from the ordinary high water level of the lake. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant verify the setback for the septic location for Lot 6, as it is close to the required setback. Stormwater The applicant proposes stormwater improvements to be constructed in connection with the expansion of the shared driveway for lots 3-6. It is not practical to construct a stormwater system for the construction on the lots within the subdivision. As such, each lot will be required to incorporate stormwater improvements in connection with construction in the future. Transportation/Access Lots 1 and 2 are proposed to share a driveway which would access Parkview Drive in the location of the existing orchard driveway at 2900 Parkview Drive. Lots 3-6 are proposed to share a driveway in the location of the existing driveway for 2700 Parkview Drive. This driveway is proposed to be widened to 20 feet in width and paved in order to provide emergency access. The shared driveway would be 20 feet in wide to the point where it splits into two shared driveways (one driveway for lots 3 and 4 and one driveway for lots 5 and 6). The City Engineer has provided comments related to the design of the shared driveway for lots 3-6, and staff also recommends a condition requiring the applicant to abide by the requirements of Hennepin County. Wally Marx Page 8 of 11 September 19, 2017 CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting Easements Staff recommends a condition requiring the preliminary plat to dedicate drainage and utility easements around the perimeter of each lot, over the outlot containing the shared driveway, and over all wetland areas. Park Dedication According to the subdivision ordinance, the City can require the following for park dedication 1) Up to 10% of the buildable (non -wetland) land — approximately 4 acres in this case 2) Cash -in -lieu — 8% of the pre -developed market value subject to a minimum of $3500 per unit and maximum of $8000 per unit - $24,000 in this case 3) Combination of the above. Staff estimates that the area of the proposed trail easement is approximately 1/2 acre and the trail easement to the eastern property line will likely account for another 3/4 acre. This would account for approximately 31.25% of the required dedication. The Park Commission reviewed at their June 21 meeting. An excerpt from the meeting minutes is attached for reference. The Commission made the following recommendation: 1. The public trail be created now at the applicant's expense 2. The public trail easement be secured for the future trail connecting Parkview Drive with Willow Drive. 3. The City look at moving the public trail access point closer to the parking lot driveway of Baker National Golf Course. 4. A sign be created to mark the access point for the public trail. 5. Staff reviews the feasibility of putting some parking by the side of the road for at least a couple cars. 6. Create walkway alongside of Parkview from the trail parking or golf course entrance to make it safer for people that want to walk to the public trail. The CD-PUD ordinance does permit the City to provide flexibility with regards to park dedication requirements as an incentive for conservation design. The Park Commission recommended requiring improvements (clearing and limited preparation/seeding) of the looped trail. The cost of such preparation would be appropriate to credit. This would likely consume the remaining required park dedication, especially with creation of a trailhead. Review Criteria/Discretion Ultimately, the Planning Commission and City Council have full discretion to determine if a proposed CD-PUD subdivision better serves the conservation objectives of the City than would conventional development. The Planning Commission and City Council have complete discretion to determine the extent to which the flexibility described in the CD-PUD district, including density bonuses, is justified by the proposed conservation. Staff believes that the proposed site is a good candidate for consideration of a conservation design subdivision and staff has suggested some potential alterations to the plan which would seem to better serve the conservation objectives of the CD-PUD district. The primary question would be how much flexibility, especially bonus density, is appropriate as an incentive for the permanent conservation. Wally Mark Page 9 of 11 September 19, 2017 CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request at the June 13, 2017 meeting. An excerpt from the meeting minutes is attached for reference. One neighboring resident spoke at the hearing, and stated that they did not believe the conservation proposed justified the density bonus requested. Planning Commissioners generally found that the proposal met the conservation objectives to an extent which they would support the development. The Commission did not raise any concerns and unanimously recommended approval. If the City Council determines that the proposal is consistent with the conservation objectives of the City and supports flexibility, staff would recommend the following conditions for consideration: 1. The Applicant shall submit final construction plans in connection with the final plat application for review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall be in a form and of substance acceptable to the City and which shall include the conditions described in this approval as well as other requirements of City ordinance or policy. 3. The Applicant shall provide to the City a letter of credit prior to any site construction in an amount recommended by the City Engineer to ensure completion of the required improvements. 4. Except as explicitly authorized by City resolution or ordinance, all aspects of this subdivision shall comply with all applicable state laws, city codes, ordinances and regulations. 5. The Applicant shall submit a preliminary plat which dedicates drainage and utility easement as recommended by the City Engineer. 6. The Applicant shall obtain wetland replacement plan approval prior to approval of the final plat. 7. The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance, including easement, signage, and vegetation requirements. 8. The Applicant shall submit covenants for review and approval of the City. Such documents shall ensure maintenance of conservation areas, stormwater facilities, shared driveway(s), and other common elements. 9. Shared driveways shall meet relevant standards and include a reciprocal easement and maintenance agreement satisfactory to the City, which shall be recorded against the properties. 10. The Applicant shall grant trail easements in the locations shown on the plans received by the City on September 1, 2017. The Applicant shall also prepare the looped trail and the extension to Parkview Trail. 11. Conservation easements shall be granted over all conservation areas and shall be in a form and of substance acceptable to the City. The easement shall include enforcement and collection methods by which the easement holder can ensure payment of ongoing annual maintenance costs of the conservation areas by the homeowners within the subdivision. The easement holder for the conservation area shall be secured prior to application for final plat and be willing to accept the easement in the manner required by the CD-PUD District Ordinance. Wally Marx Page 10 of 11 September 19, 2017 CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting 12. Details on any significant tree removal and compliance with the tree preservation ordinance shall be provided. 13. Final land stewardship plan shall be provided in connection with the application for final plat for review and approval by the City. 14. The Applicant shall address all comments from the City Attorney, City Engineer, Hennepin County, and Minnehaha Creek Watershed. 15. The Applicant shall submit title evidence satisfactory to the City Attorney at the time of submission of the final plat application. 16. The Developer shall obtain necessary approvals and permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Hennepin County, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, and other relevant agencies. 17. The application for final plat shall be submitted to the City within 360 days of preliminary approval or the preliminary plat shall be considered null and void. 18. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the Planned Unit Development, preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Attachments 1. Document List 2. Conservation Design-PUD Ordinance 3. Excerpt from 6/13/2017 Planning Commission minutes 4. Excerpt from draft 6/21/2017 Park Commission minutes 5. Excerpt from 2/7/2017 City Council minutes 6. Letter from Charles and Pamela Schroeder 7. Letter from Cindy and Addison Piper 8. Comments from City Engineer dated 6/8/2017 9. Comments from Building Official dated 5/26/2017 10. Applicant Narrative 11. Applicant Conservation Objective Presentation 12. Forest Analysis 13. Land Stewardship Plan 14. Plat received by the City 9/1/2017 15. Plans received by the City 5/12/2017 Wally Marx Page 11 of 11 September 19, 2017 CD-PUD General Plan/Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting Project: LR-17-205 — Marx CD-PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 5/12/2017 5/12/2017 3 Application Y Fee Narrative 5/12/2017 N/A 7 Narrative Y Labels 5/12/2017 N/A 1 Labels Y Land Stewardship Plan 5/12/2017 5/10/2017 15 Land Stewardship Plan Y Land Stewardship Plan 9/5/2017 8/4/2017 23 Land Steward Plan-9-5-17 Y Conservation Easement 5/12/2017 N/A 17 Conservation Easement Y Conservation Easement 9/5/2017 N/A 14 Easement — 9-5-2017 Plans 5/12/2017 5/8/2017 6 Plans Y Lot size calculation 5/12/2017 5/8/2017 1 Lot Size Summary Y Lot Summary 8/31/2017 8/31/2017 1 Lot Summary — 8-31-2017 Preliminary Plat 6/16/2017 6/15/2017 1 Plat-6-16-2017 Y Site Plan — updated 6/16/2017 6/15/2017 1 Site Plan — 6-16-2017 Y Driveway 4 Exhibit 6/16/2017 6/15/2017 1 Driveway Exhibit Y Site Plan — updated 7/7/2017 7/5/2017 1 Site Plan — 7-5-2017 Y Site Plan — updated 9/1/2017 9/1/2017 1 Site Plan — 9-1-2017 Y Narrative — updated 7/7/2017 N/A 8 Narrative — 7-7-2017 Y CD Presentation 7/7/2017 6/18/2017 14 Presentation 7-7-2017 Y CD Presentation 9/14/2017 Tree Sample 9/1/2017 8/22/2017 12 Tree Info Y Extension 7/13/2017 7/13/2017 1 Extension Y October 31, 2017 (continued on back) Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Legal Comments 5/25/2017 1 Legal Comments Engineering Comments 6/8/2017 2 Engineering Comments Building official comments 5/26/2017 1 Building Comments Preliminary Review/Schedule 6/9/2017 2 120day Letter Legal Notice 6/1/2017 12 Notice Prelim Review/120 day review letter 6/9/2017 2 120 day letter Natural Resource comments 6/20/2017 2 Natural Resource comments Natural Resource comments 7/13/2017 2 Nat Res comments-7-13-17 Planning Commission Report 6/8/2017 11 Y 69 pages with attachments Park Commission Report 6/15/2017 8 Y 54 pages with attachments City Council Report 9/19/2017 11 Y 83 pages with attachments Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes Letter from Charles and Pamela Schroeder 6/9/2017 Schroeder Planning Commission minutes 6/13/2017 PC minutes-06-13-2017 Park Commission minutes 6/21/2017 Park minutes-06-21-2017 Letter from Cindy and Addison Piper 9/12/2017 Piper CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. 615 AN ORDINANCE REGARDING CONSERVATION DESIGN; AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE The City Council of the City of Medina ordains as follows: SECTION I. Section 827.51 eq. seq. of the code of ordinances of the city of Medina is amended by deleting the stricken language and adding the underlined language as follows: CONSERVATION DESIGN DISTRICT (CD) Section 827.51. Conservation Design (CD) — Purpose. The purpose of this district is to preserve the City's ecological resources, wildlife corridors, scenic views, and rural character while allowing residential development consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Open Space Report as updated from time to time. The specific conservation objectives of this district are to: 1. Protect the ecological function of native hardwood forests, lakes, streams, and wetlands. 2. Protect moderate to high quality ecologically significant natural areas. 3. Protect opportunities to make ecological connections between parks and other protected lands and ecologically significant natural areas. 4. Protect important viewsheds including scenic road segments. 5. Create public and private trails for citizens to access and enjoy Open Space resources. 6. Create public and private Open Space for citizens to access and enjoy Open Space resources. Section 827.53 Applicability. Subd. 1. Conservation design is an option that a property owner is encouraged to consider as an alternative to Conventional Development, as defined herein. The City will give heightened consideration to conservation design applications that achieve significantsuel} requests where the opportunities to achieve conservation objectives are significantly higher than that availablenot otherwise attainable through conventional development. Conservation design may be considered on qualifying parcels lying in the Rural Residential District} and all sewered residential districts, and commercial or business districts. Section 827.55 Intent. Subd. 1. It is the intent of the City to accomplish the stated purpose of this District by approving a Planned Unit Development. In exchange for achieving the conservation Ordinance No. 615 1 July 5, 2017 objectives, it is the intent of the City to provide permit additional density and to provide design flexibility and to encourage development review through a Collaborative Process. Subd. 2. The permitted, conditional and accessory uses and other regulations set forth in the existing zoning districts shall apply unless specifically addressed in this District, the PUD District, or, if determined by the City Council to be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of this District} as part of the final PUD documents. Subd. 3. The procedures and regulations set forth in the PUD District shall apply unless specifically addressed in this District. If a final PUD plan is approved by the City, the subject property shall be rezoned to Conservation Design-PUD District (CD-PUD). The permitted uses and all other regulations governing uses on the subject land shall then be those found in the CD-PUD zoning district and documented by the PUD plans and agreements. The following subsections are requirements for all CD-PUDs unless exceptions, as part of a PUD, are otherwise approved by the City Council. Section 827.57. Definitions. Subd. 1. Base Density. The maximum number of units or lots that are allowed on a parcel in accordance with the standards of the existing zoning district and the Zoning and Subdivision Codes. Subd. 2. Buildable Land Area. The total land area in a proposed Conservation Design Subdivision less the amount of land that includes: slopes greater than 18%, wetlands, required wetland buffers, lakes, and land contained within the 100 year floodplain. Subd. 3. Collaborative Process. A development review process that results in a development plan in which clearly defined conservation objectives are achieved in exchange for greater flexibility from the requirements of the base zoning district and the Zoning and Subdivision Codes. Subd. 4. Conventional Development. Development that meets the standard minimum requirements of the City's ordinances regulating development. Subd. 5. Conservation Easement. As defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 84C: A nonpossessory interest of a holder in real property imposing limitations or affirmative obligations the purposes of which include retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open - space values of real property, assuring its availability for agricultural, forest, recreational, or open -space use, protecting natural resources, maintaining or enhancing air or water quality, or preserving the historical, architectural, archaeological, or cultural aspects of real property. Subd. 6. Conservation Design Subdivision. Any development of land that incorporates the concepts of designated Conservation Areas and clustering of dwelling units. Ordinance No. 615 2 July 5, 2017 Subd. 7. Conservation Area. Designated land within a Conservation Design Subdivision that contributes towards achievement of one or more of the conservation objectives. A Conservation Easement is placed on Conservation Areas to permanently restrict the Conservation Area from future development. Conservation Areas may be used for preservation of ecological resources, habitat corridors, passive recreation, and for pasture, hay cropping and other low impact agricultural uses. Subd. 8. Homeowners Association. A formally constituted non-profit association or corporation made up of the property owners and/or residents of a development for the purpose of owning, operating and maintaining common Conservation Areas and/or other commonly owned facilities and Open Space. Subd. 9. Open Space. Land that is not designated as a Conservation Area that is used for parks, trails or other uses. Open Space may be owned and managed by the City, homeowner's association or other entity. Subd. 10. Viewshed. The landscape or topography visible from a geographic point, especially that having aesthetic value. Subd. 11. Yield Plan. A conceptual layout that shows the maximum number of lots that could be placed on a parcel in accordance with the standards of the existing zoning district and the Zoning and Subdivision Codes. The Yield Plan shows proposed lots, streets, rights -of -way, and other pertinent features. Yield Plans shall be drawn to scale. The layout shall be realistic and reflect a development pattern that could reasonably be expected to be implemented, taking into account the presence of wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes, and existing easements. Section 827.59. General Performance Standards. Subd. 1. Minimum Size of Subdivision. (a) The minimum land area required for development shall be: (1) 40 contiguous acres in the Rural Residential District (2) 20 contiguous acres in sewered residential districts (3) 10 contiguous acres in commercial or business districts (b) A subdivision in the Rural Residential District of over 20 contiguous acres but less than 40 contiguous acres may apply for approval if they -it meets all the requirements for of the CD-PUD District, and the visual impact of the subdivision from existing adjacent roadways is mitigated by existing topography, existing vegetation, and/or acceptable vegetative buffers. Subd 2. Required Conservation Area. The minimum required Conservation Area within the CD development shall be: (a) At least 30% of the total Buildable Land Area in the Rural Residential District, or higher depending on the land and opportunities to achieve the City's conservation objectives. (b) At least 20% of the total Buildable Land Area in sewered residential, commercial, Ordinance No. 615 3 July 5, 2017 or business districts, or higher depending on the land and opportunities to achieve the City's conservation objectives. (a) The required amount of Conservation Area shall be designated and located to maximize achievement of the City's conservation objectives. Opportunities for achieving these objectives will vary depending on the location, size and specific achieve the following primary and secondary conservation objectives over and above that achievable under conventional development: (1) Parcels with opportunities to achieve the following primary conservation objectives will be given higher consideration for flexibility from performance standards. hardwood forests (e.g. Maple Basswood Forest), lakes, streams and wetlands. (2) The protection, restoration, and/or creation of moderate to high quality iegi-,,,i . i„dif . Oho s sitive o iegi-,,,i r ident f;oa ,.:t.> „ too r,,,..,p s:to M-ap f41,o Opel S,, ee Report as updated from time to time. (3) The reservation of land connecting these aquatic and terrestrial resources suitable for habitat movement corridors. (2) Parcels with opportunities to achieve the following secondary conservation i. The protection of scenic views and viewsheds including the views from roads identified as "Scenic Roads" on the Scenic Roads Map of the Open Space Report as updated from time to time. ii. The reservation of land for incorporating public and private trails in order current Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan. ii. The reservation of land for incorporating public and /or private Open Space in order to achieve goals as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 4. Pcrimctcr Setbacks. Structure setbacks from the perimeter of the subdivision shall be-the—saide-as-the existii3-wing-d is-tfie applicant is not in agreement with the Composite Map of the Open Space Report or the data an appeal to the city. Subd. 1. The applicant shall put the appeal in writing, accompanied by the fee as described by the City's Fee Schedule, and is responsible to provide documentation supporting their appeal. Ordinance No. 615 4 July 5, 2017 Subd. 2. The appeal shall be reviewed by city staff, with the assistance of any technical consultants which city staff shall determine are appropriate. Such consultants may include, but are not limited to, environmental engineers, wetland scientists, arborists and other similar experts. City staff shall make a determination on the appeal within sixty days of receipt of a complete appeal application. Subd 3. The applicant may appeal city staff s decision to the city council. The appeal must be filed within thirty days of staffs determination. Subd. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for the costs accrued by the City in review of the appeals described above, including the costs of technical consultants hired by the City. Section 827.61. Density and Design Flexibility. Flexibility from the requirements of the existing zoning district or other requirements of this code may be granted at the discretion of the City Council. In considering the amount, if any, of such flexibility, the City will evaluate the amount and quality of Conservation Area protected, the public access to or enjoyment thereof, and how well the project achieves the following conservation objectives over and above that achievable under conventional development and the amount and quality of conservation area protected. Subd. 1. Conservation Objectives and Determining Flexibility. Conservation Area(s) shall be designated and located to maximize achievement of the City's conservation objectives. Opportunities for achieving these objectives will vary depending on the location, size and specific qualities of the subject parcel. Each parcel will be evaluated for opportunities to achieve the following primary and secondary conservation objectives over and above that achievable under conventional development. (a) Parcels with opportunities to achieve the following primary conservation objectives will be given higher consideration for flexibility from performance standards. (1) The protection and/or restoration of the ecological function of native hardwood forests (e.g. Maple -Basswood Forest). (2) The protection and preservation of, lakes, streams and wetlands beyond existing regulatory requirements. (3) The protection, restoration, and/or creation of moderate to high quality ecological resources including the sensitive ecological resources identified as priority areas on the Composite Map of the Open Space Report as updated from time to time. (4) The reservation of land connecting these aquatic and terrestrial ecological resources in order to restore and/or create new ecological resources suitable for habitat movement corridors. Ordinance No. 615 5 July 5, 2017 (5) The reservation of land for incorporating public and private trails in order to create connections to existing or planned trails as identified in the current Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan. (b) Parcels with opportunities to achieve the following secondary conservation objectives may be given consideration for flexibility from performance standards: (1) The protection of scenic views and viewsheds including the views from roads identified as "Scenic Roads" on the Scenic Roads Map of the Open Space Report as updated from time to time. The reservation of land for incorporating public and private trails in order to create connections to existing or planned trails as identified in the current Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan. (1)(2) The reservation of land for incorporating public and /or private Open Space in order to achieve goals as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Subd.12. Additional Density. (a) Density, in addition to the Base Density, may be granted at the discretion of the City Council. Any additional density or additional number of dwelling units shall be calculated as a percentage of Base Density. The Base Density shall be that established by regulations in the relevant existing zoning district. The granting of additional density shall be at the full and complete discretion of the City based upon the amount and quality of the Conservation Area protected, public access to or enjoyment thereof, and the extent to which the proposal meets the objectives over and above that achievable through Conventional Development. (1) In the Rural Residential District, Base Density shall be determined by calculating the number of 5-acre areas of contiguous soils suitable for a standard sewage disposal system that are located on the subject property. (2) In sewered residential districts, a Yield Plan shall be developed to determine Base Density. Regulations of the base district and all other relevant land use regulations of this Code shall be used for completing the Yield Plan. (b) The total number of dwelling units in a CD-PUD development shall be guided by the density limitations contained in the Comprehensive Plan and may be: (1) Up to 200% ofA maximum of twice the amount of the calculated Base Density in the Rural Residential District, provided that the maximum density bonus will only be granted in exceptional circumstances. (2) Up to 120% ofA maximum of 1.2 times the calculated Base Density in all sewered residential districts. Ordinance No. 615 6 July 5, 2017 Subd. 21 Other areas of flexibility (a) In the Rural Residential District, flexibility may include: (1) Lot size, lot width and structure setbacks provided setbacks comply with the following minimums: i. Minimum Lot Area: 2 Y2 acres ii. Setback from local streets: 35 feet. Setback from Arterial and Collector Streets: 100 feet. iv. Interior structure setbacks: 30 feet. Perimeter setbacks: Minimum structure setbacks from the perimeter of the subdivision shall be 50 feet. (2) Housing type. (3) Upland buffers and tree preservation regulations provided that the objectives of these regulations are met for the site as a whole. (4) Due consideration may be given for conservation easements granted when calculating park dedication requirements. (5) Variations to City regulations regarding septic systems. (b) In all sewered residential districts, flexibility may include: (1) Lot size, lot width, and structure setbacks, except that setbacks from the perimeter of the subdivision shall be equal to or greater than that required in the underlying zoning district. (2) Housing type. (3) Landscaping. (4) Screening. (5) Upland buffers and tree preservation regulations provided that the objectives of these regulations are met for the site as a whole. (6) Buffer yard. (7) Due consideration may be given for conservation easements granted when calculating park dedication requirements. (c) In commercial or business districts, flexibility may include: (1) Lot size, lot width, and structure setbacks. (2) Building height limitations, provided that the City determines that adequate emergency and fire access are provided in consultation with the fire department. (3) Landscaping. (4) Screening. (5) Loading dock and outside storage requirements. (6) Upland buffers and tree preservation regulations provided that the objectives of these regulations are met for the site as a whole. (7) Buffer yard. (8) Due consideration may be given for conservation easements granted when calculating park dedication requirements. Section 827.63. Conservation Area Protection and Ownership. Subd. 1. Land and improvements in areas designated as Conservation Areas in a CD-PUD shall be established, protected and owned in accordance with the following guidelines: Ordinance No. 615 7 July 5, 2017 (a) Designated Conservation Areas shall be surveyed and subdivided as separate outlots. (b) Designated Conservation Areas must be restricted from further development by a permanent Conservation Easement (in accordance with Minnesota Statute Chapter 84C.01-05) running with the land. The Conservation Easement must be submitted with the General Plan of Development and approved by the City Attorney. (1) The permanent Conservation Easement may be held by any combination of the entities defined by Minnesota Statute Chapter 84C, but in no case may the holder of the Conservation Easement be the same as the owner of the underlying fee. (2) The permanent Conservation Easement shall be recorded with Hennepin County and must specify: i. The entity that will maintain the designated Conservation Area. ii. The purposes of the Conservation Easement, that the easement is permanent, and the conservation values of the property. iii. The legal description of the land under the easement. iv. The restrictions on the use of the land and from future development. v. To what standards the Conservation Areas will be maintained through reference to an approved land stewardship plan. vi. Who will have access to the Conservation Area. (3) Ownership of the underlying fee of each designated Conservation Area parcel, may be held by any combination of the following entities: i. A common ownership association, subject to the provisions in the PUD District. ii. An individual who will use the land in accordance with the permanent Conservation Easement. iii. A private nonprofit organization, specializing in land conservation and stewardship, that has been designated by the Internal Revenue Service as qualifying under section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. iv. A government agency (e.g. park and/or natural resource agency or division). v. The City of Medina, in rare situations when there are no other viable options. (c) Open Space areas that do not achieve the City's conservation objectives may be established under a homeowner's association without protection by a Conservation Easement. Such areas shall be regulated according to provisions of the PUD District. Section 827.65. Land Stewardship Plan. Subd. 1. Plan Objectives. Where a CD-PUD has designated Conservation Areas, a plan for the development, long-term use, maintenance, and insurance of all Conservation Areas, may be required. The plan shall: (a) Define ownership and methods of land protection. (b) Establish necessary regular and periodic operation and maintenance responsibilities. (c) Estimate staffing needs, insurance requirements, and other associated costs associated with plan implementation and define the means for funding the same on an on -going basis. This shall include land management fees necessary to fund monitoring and Ordinance No. 615 8 July 5, 2017 management of the Conservation Easement by the easement holder. The fees shall be estimated and validated by the proposed easement holder. (d) Meet the requirements of the future conservation easement holder. Subd. 2. Plan Submittal Requirements. A preliminary Land Stewardship Plan shall be submitted with the General Plan of Development. A Final Land Stewardship Plan shall be submitted with the Final Plan Stage of PUD development. The plan shall contain a narrative describing: (a) Existing conditions, including all natural, cultural, historic, and scenic elements in the landscape; (b) Objectives for each Conservation Area, including: (1) The proposed permanent or maintained landscape condition for each area. (2) Any restoration measures needed to achieve the proposed permanent condition, including: i. Measures for correcting increasingly destructive conditions, such as erosion and intrusion of invasive plant species. ii. Measures for restoring historic features (if applicable). iii. Measures for restoring existing or establishing new landscape types. A maintenance plan, including: i. Activities needed to maintain the stability of the resources, including mowing and burning schedules, weed control measures, planting schedules, and clearing and cleanup measures and schedules. ii. An estimate of the annual on -going (post restoration) operating and maintenance costs. (3) Subd. 3. Funding of Operation and Maintenance. At the discretion of the City, the applicant may be required to escrow sufficient funds for the maintenance and operation costs of Conservation Areas for up to four years depending on restoration measures. Subd. 4. Enforcement. In the event that the fee holder of the Conservation Areas, common areas and facilities, or any successor organization thereto, fails to properly maintain all or any portion of the aforesaid common areas or facilities, the City in coordination with the holder of the easement, may serve written notice upon such fee holder setting forth the manner in which the fee holder has failed to maintain the aforesaid common areas and facilities. Such notice shall set forth the nature of corrections required and the time within which the corrections shall be made. Upon failure to comply within the time specified, the fee holder-, or any successor organization, shall be considered in violation of this Ordinance, in which case the City shall have the right to enter the premises and take the needed corrective actions. The costs of corrective actions by the City shall be assessed against the properties that have the right of enjoyment of the common areas and facilities. Ordinance No. 615 9 July 5, 2017 Section 827.67. Conservation Area Design Standards. The following Conservation Area design standards shall also be considered in designing the CD-PUD: Subd. 1. Conservation Areas should be interconnected wherever possible to provide a continuous network of Open Space within the PUD and throughout the City. It should coordinate and maximize boundaries with Conservation Areas and Open Space on adjacent tracts. Subd. 2. Incorporate public and private trails with connections to existing or planned regional trails as identified in the most recent Park, Trail and Open Space Plan. Subd. 3. Designated public access trails shall be protected by an access easement owned by the City. Subd. 4. Incorporate public and/or private Open Space as designated in the Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 5. Views of new dwellings from exterior roads and abutting properties should be minimized by the use of existing topography, existing vegetation, or additional landscaping. Ridge and hilltops should be contained within designated Conservation Areas wherever possible. Trees should not be removed from ridges and hilltops. Subd. 6. The boundaries of designated conservation areas shall be clearly delineated and labeled on CD-PUD plans. These areas shall be delineated in the field with signage or other measures approved by the city. Subd. 7. Stormwater management facilities may be located in designated conservation areas. Subd. 8. Existing land in row -cropping use shall be converted to a use that supports the achievement of the City's conservation objectives. Section 827.69. Landscape Design Standards. Subd. 1. Street trees may be planted, but are not required, along internal streets passing through common Conservation Areas or Open Space. Subd. 2. Irregular spacing is encouraged for street trees, to avoid the urban appearance that regular spacing may invoke. Subd. 3. The selection of vegetation should be guided by the natural community types identified in the City's 2008 Natural Resources Inventory. Ordinance No. 615 10 July 5, 2017 Subd. 4. Planted buffers between clusters of residential lots are encouraged to enhance privacy and a rural appearance between lots. Subd. 5. Buffers consisting of an informal arrangement of native plant species combined with infrequent mowing are strongly encouraged, to create a low -maintenance, natural landscape. Subd. 6. Planted buffers are also encouraged along natural drainage areas to minimize erosion. Subd. 7. Grading for Conservation Areas and other common landscaped areas and stormwater management areas shall be avoided to reduce compaction and impacting water infiltration rates. Soil testing and decompaction may be required if site construction activities negatively impact soil permeability. Subd. 8. Better Site Design/Low Impact Development practices as identified in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual published by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency shall be used to design sites and meet the performance standards. Section 827.71. Subsurface Sewage Treatment Facilities. Subd. 1. Where city services are not available, CD PUD developments may be platted to accommodate home site lots with either ildiN:a,,,,' septic tank-s afi a r- roa drainfields/mound systems located on the lot, or individual septic tanks and primary afair fteki/V etti * �• �* m-lec- ted on the lot and secondary drainfields/mound system located in the designated Conservation Area or other Open Space. Subd. 21. Where city sanitary sewer service is not available, Aall septic systems shall conform to the current performance standards of Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 and its appendices, or the amended Rules in effect at the time of installation. Except in instances where flexibility has been explicitly granted by the City, septic systems shall also conform to relevant City regulations, including the requirement to identify a primary and secondary drainfield site. Subd. 32. The City may consider shared sewage treatment systems which are consistent with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) regulations and relevant City ordinances, provided adequate agreements are in place related to monitoring and maintenance procedures and replacement of the system in case of a failure. Subd. 43. Lots within CD-PUD developments may be designed so that individual septic tanks and all required treatment and dispersal areas are located within the lot, or so that individual septic tanks and the primary treatment and dispersal area is located within the lot and the secondary treatment and dispersal area located in the designated Conservation Area or other Open Space. Secondary drain ;eldsi.,,,,un systems treatment and dispersal areas may only be located in designated Conservation Areas and other Open Space provided that: Ordinance No. 615 11 July 5, 2017 (a) They -The treatment and dispersal area isare located within a limited distance of the lots they -it serves. (b) Construction of treatment and dispersal area drainfields/mound systems do not result in the destruction of ecological resources. (c) The Conservation Area or Open Space parcel containing the treatment and dispersal area dfai fieldi.,,eun syste„. is owned in fee by a common ownership association which owns non -Conservation Area land within the subdivision and in which membership in the association by all property owners in the subdivision is mandatory. (d) The individual lot owner is responsible for maintenance and repair of the treatment and dispersal areadrainfield/mound system. (e) The ground cover over the treatment and dispersal area drainfield/mound system is maintained according to the Land Stewardship Plan. (f) Recreational uses are prohibited within 50 feet of the treatment and dispersal areadrainfields/mound systems. (g) The Conservation Easement for the dedicated Conservation Area parcel describes the location of individual drainfields/mound systems treatment and dispersal areas. (g)(h) The City may consider the impact of the future construction of the treatment and dispersal area(s) when determining the value of the Conservation Area, the extent to which the Conservation ob'ectives have been met, and the amount of density and design flexibility which is granted. Section 827.72 Open Space Report Composite Map Appeal Process. In the event that an applicant is not in agreement with the Composite Map of the Open Space Report or the data contained within a report on which the Composite Map is based upon, the applicant may present an appeal to the city. Subd. 1. The applicant shall put the appeal in writing, accompanied by the fee as described by the City's Fee Schedule, and is responsible to provide documentation supporting their appeal. Subd. 2. The appeal shall be reviewed by city staff, with the assistance of any technical consultants which city staff shall determine are appropriate. Such consultants may include, but are not limited to, environmental engineers, wetland scientists, arborists and other similar experts. City staff shall make a determination on the appeal within sixty days of receipt of a complete appeal application. Subd 3. The applicant may appeal city staff s decision to the city council. The appeal must be filed within thirty days of staff s determination. Subd. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for the costs accrued by the City in review of the appeals described above, including the costs of technical consultants hired by the City. Section 827.73. Site Design Process. At the time of PUD Concept Plan development and review, applicants shall demonstrate that the following design process was performed and influenced the design of the concept site plan. Ordinance No. 615 12 July 5, 2017 Subd. 1. Step 1—Identify Conservation Areas. Identify preservation land in two steps. First identify "unbuildable" areas which include: slopes greater than 18%, wetlands, wetland buffers, lakes, and land within the 100 year floodplain. Next, identify Conservation Areas which include those areas designated as Conservation Areas (Section 827.59 Subd. 3.) The remaining land shall be identified as the potentially Buildable Land Area. The applicant shall identify the quantity of land designated as unbuildable, Conservation Area, and potentially Buildable Land Area. Subd. 2. Step 2—Locate Housing Sites. Locate the approximate sites of individual houses in regard to protected views and the potentially buildable land areas. Subd. 3. Step 3—Align Streets and Trails. Align streets in order to access the lots. New trails and connections to regional trail systems, if any, should be laid out to create internal and external connections to existing and/or potential future streets, sidewalks, and trails. Subd. 4. Step 4—Lot Lines. Draw in the lot lines. Section 827.75. CD-PUD Application Processing. The review and approval procedures of the PUD District shall be used to review and approve CD-PUDs. Prior to the Concept Plan Stage PUD application, the City encourages applicants to engage in an informal collaborative project goal setting process with the City. The purpose of this process is to jointly develop site design and conservation objectives and assess areas of regulatory flexibility for achieving developer and City objectives for the specific parcel of land. The Collaborative Process may include council members, city commission members, land owners, developers, city staff, other governmental jurisdiction staff, the potential future Conservation Easement holder, and other participants as appropriate. The outcome of the process is a Project Guidance Report prepared by city staff. The report will summarize the project concept, project objectives, and preliminary understanding of regulatory flexibility needed to achieve the objectives. SECTION II. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication. Adopted by the Medina city council this 5th day of July, 2017. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Published in the Crow River News on the 20th day of July, 2017 Ordinance No. 615 13 July 5, 2017 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 6/13/2017 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing — Wallace and Bridget Marx — 2700-2900 Parkview Dr. — Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) General Plan for Conservation Design Subdivision Finke presented a request for a PUD general plan and preliminary plat for the property at 270-2900 Parkview Drive. He stated that earlier this year the Commission and Council reviewed a concept plan review for this proposed development. He stated that the applicant is proposing to have 70 acres of land placed into conservation, while 11.75 acres of the conserved area would be buildable. He provided details on the looped public trail and that individual homeowners would own the adjacent lots that would fall under the easement. He provided an aerial photograph of the site with an overlay of the applicant's plan. He stated that there are wetlands throughout the property, the largest on the southwest portion of the site and has been rated as a good quality natural resource. He identified other resources which have also been identified as good quality. He displayed the proposed plan, noting the proposed conservation areas. He stated that the land is guided for agricultural or rural residential similar to the adjacent parcels. He stated the conservation design ordinance allows a property to develop in a more flexible manner in order to preserve property through permanent conservation. He stated that the primary piece of flexibility that is provided through the ordinance is the bonus density that would allow up to double the base density of the site. He stated that ultimately the flexibility is fully at the discretion of the City and provided details on the criteria that are used to determine the value of the conserved areas. He stated that the applicant is proposing 40 percent of the buildable area to be conserved, while that encompasses more than 77 percent of the entire site. He noted that staff would give more consideration to the steep slope wooded area that is not as protected under City regulations. He noted that wetland buffer and buffer areas would already be conserved in the standard ordinance. He stated that there are six lots proposed and displayed the different lot sizes, which range up to 6.5 acres in size. He noted that all sites proposed would incorporate primary and secondary septic sites within the lots. He provided additional details on the proposed access and rankings for the conserved areas within the natural resources report. He stated that the applicant has proposed a public trail throughout the conservation area on the site. He noted that the Park Commission had mentioned providing a connection to the property to the east. He stated that the applicant seems to be in agreement with providing that connection. He stated that staff does believe that this parcel would be a good opportunity for conservation design, noting that some level of flexibility is required if the City is going to provide this option to developers. He stated that the main discussion would be to weigh the conservation value being provided against the flexibility requested. He stated that staff has supplied a number of conditions that they would recommend should the Commission be in agreement with the conservation design. Reid asked if the City is obtaining 11.75 acres in land that they would not have received in exchange for the three bonus homes. She noted that the wetlands and swamp would be protected under current regulations. Finke replied that the 11.75 acres are shown in yellow and three additional acres of wooded steep slope areas would also be protected. He noted that the other areas are pockets near wetlands or laying within setbacks. He noted that a total of 20 acres additional would be provided outside of the wetland and buffers. He noted that the City would also be given the permanent conservation of those areas, regardless of buildable/unbuildable and protected/unprotected. Kent Williams addressed the Commission on behalf of the applicant and introduced the members of the team that are present including Wally Marx. He identified the proposed locations for the lots and the criteria that are used to evaluate requests under the conservation design ordinance. He provided a comparison of this request to the only approved conservation design development, Stonegate (Deerhill Preserve). He identified the different natural resource elements that would be included in the conservation area that are ranked as good quality. He noted that School Lake is a hidden lake and views of the lake and other resources would be given to the public through the looped trail. He noted that an 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 6/13/2017 Meeting Minutes east/west connection would also be provided and there would be public access to each of the conserved elements on the property. He noted that there is not a high percentage of buildable land on the property, but this request would conserve 40 percent of the buildable land. Albers asked if there are plans to provide access to the lake, such as a boat landing or dock. Williams replied that it would simply be viewing access. Michael Pressman, Conservation Solutions, stated that he was introduced to the Marx property 13 years ago when he was working with a local watershed. He noted that the natural resources report of the City of Medina also identified elements on this property. He identified the amount and quality of the natural resources on the property, noting that conventional development would protect 49 acres, while this request would provide 70 acres of conserved land. He referenced the old growth maple -basswood forest, noting that many of the trees exceed 40 inches in diameter. He stated that this type of asset is rare and would be protected, and the public would also be given access to that resource. He stated that this tamarack bog resource was also identified as a rare element that should be protected under the City's natural resources report and also by Hennepin County. He described the protections along the lakeshore that would be included through this request compared to the typical clearing of trees and maintenance of turf grass that typically occurs for lakeshore property. He stated that this property is a great combination of elements that come together for a great opportunity to conserve land and provide habitat for wildlife and vegetation. He noted that the location next to Baker Park also provides an opportunity for connectivity. He stated that in western Hennepin County, large complexes of natural resources are the best that they have to offer in terms of opportunities for preservation. He referenced different reports that identify this area as a high priority for conservation, including the City, County, DNR, and local Watershed. He stated that a lot of communities pay landowners for conservation easements. He stated that the leaders in Medina created this conservation easement ordinance to allow the City to obtain these conservation easements for free in return for flexibility with development. White referenced the water quality of School Lake, noting that many lakes in Medina are impaired. Laura Domyancich, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, stated that School Lake has not been considered impaired. She noted that water quality testing and aquatic invasive species testing has recently occurred. She stated that Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) was approached as a proposed easement holder for the property. She stated that in a practical sense MCWD would do periodic inspection of the site and a land stewardship plan would maintain the conservation areas over time. She noted that there are techniques for restoration and additional options for homeowners to improve the value of the conservation elements. She stated that the development team engaged the MCWD early in the process to ensure that the necessary elements would be addressed and protected. She stated that the MCWD has a history of holding easements. Williams stated that there is an existing bridle path that goes around School Lake, noting that it is a quasi - private trail open to School Lake residents and their guests and could be ended at any time. He stated that some of the neighboring properties along School Lake have stated that they would pull out from the bridle path if it were made public. He noted that they took great pain to keep the public trail loop separate from the private bridle path. He reviewed the different criteria found within the ordinance, comparing the criteria to each of the resources protected under the conservation (high quality/old growth forest, wetlands, etc.) and to what would occur under conventional development. He stated that rather than having an HOA for six homes, the landowners would become responsible for maintaining the easement which would be easier to enforce. He noted that under normal development you could remove trees and fill wetlands, and the level of protection required is less than what would be provided in the proposal. He noted that the site currently has habitat corridors that would be protected, which would not be protected 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 6/13/2017 Meeting Minutes under normal development. He noted that the impacts proposed for the driveway and mound system would be minimal to wildlife. He noted that the private bridle path would be preserved and two public trails that currently do not exit would be added to the site which would provide public access to the elements conserved. He stated that 70 acres of property would be conserved and public trails would be provided. He provided pictures of existing homes along School Lake that have cleared trees and installed turf grass that is mowed right up to the shoreline. He noted that this proposal would preserve that shoreline and would also provide public access to view areas of the property that contain valuable assets. He stated that this property is within the 2040 long-term sewer area for the Metropolitan Council and if that happens, the density for the property will increase to up to 1401ots and the lakeshore density could increase to 7 to 14 lots. He stated that under this proposal, this land would remain with only 61ots. He stated that the density is not out of character with the neighboring properties. He compared the proposal to the only approved conservation design subdivision, noting that this request exceeds all elements of that development in terms of conservation and natural resource value. He stated that this property is exceptional and the circumstances are exceptional; and he is asking that the Commission approve the request with the full density bonus. Albers asked if there is duck hunting allowed on School Lake. Wally Marx replied that no one duck hunts on School Lake. White asked if any of the home construction would impact the lake. Williams replied that they would take steps to prevent that from occurring. White asked if there are currently erosion issues on the shoreline. It was replied that there were not any known issues. White asked if the looped public trail would be woodchipped. Williams stated that while it would not be a paved trail, the materials for the trail were not specified. He noted that they would be open to suggestion. He noted that the Park Commission wanted a nature trail for the east/west connection and provided information on the possible location, which would run along the southside of the driveway and woods. He stated that the east/west trail could be placed in the north, but they wanted to avoid the private property and bridle path. He noted that the southern trail connection would not be constructed at this time because there is nothing to connect to. He noted that Councilmember Martin suggested a looped trail and advised that the trail connection could be constructed in the beginning to provide that connection. He noted that signage would be installed to keep people on the trail. He stated that parking was mentioned and would be an issue, as he was unsure of how the trail would be used. He noted that even if just a few people drive to the trail, the only place for parking would be across the street at Baker Park and they would have to cross Parkview. White asked if that would be an appropriate use of the Baker Park parking lot. Williams stated that they could look into it. He noted that it is a public use lot. He noted that people could also ride their bicycles, but noted that the trail is meant for walking and not biking. DesLauriers asked the logic for waiving the park fees. Williams stated that this is not a conventional development and they will be preserving 70 acres through conservation easement and providing public access through trails, and therefore that should perhaps justify the waiving of park dedication. 3 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 6/13/2017 Meeting Minutes White opened the public hearing at 8:52 p.m. Charlie Schroder, 2910 Parkview, stated that he is the immediate property owner to the north. He appreciated the work that Wally Marx and his team have invested in a great project. He stated that they moved to the area because it is zoned rural residential. He acknowledged that this would be similar density to the area he lives. He stated that for the trail, it would be difficult for public members to access the trail. He did not believe it was practical for people to park at Baker Park. He stated that a large portion of his property is under conservation easement and likes that element. He stated that his main concern was the density. Reid asked if the resident would be satisfied with additional screening between his property and lot one. Schroder stated that his preference would be for one lot rather than two, but agreed that screening would be helpful. DesLauriers asked the setback of the homes. Schroder stated that he is probably 50 feet from the lot line on his side and the proposed home on lot one would be setback 50 feet as well. Williams stated that under conventional development that is where a home on lot one would be built. He noted that under any scenario the Schroders will see a home in that location. He noted that the Schroders would most likely not even be able to see the home on lot two. White closed the public hearing at 8:55 p.m. Murrin stated that she liked the presentation and found it helpful that the parameters were all laid out. She stated that for all the reasons mentioned she is in favor of the request as it is a beautiful property that is worth preserving. She did not think that adding three homes would be a huge detriment for the area in return for what the City will receive. Reid stated that she was on the Open Space Committee and there was a map of what they theoretically wanted to protect. She stated that the odds of being able to obtain the private properties was slim to none. She agreed that this property is of high value and is worth protecting. She stated that additional screening could assist with buffering the neighboring property owner. She stated that because of the greenway corridor and assets that would be preserved, she will be supporting the request. DesLauriers stated that his dad built the original home on the property 40 years ago and appreciates the history of the property. He referenced the staff comment regarding enforcement difficulties and asked what those concerns were. Finke stated that from an enforcement standpoint there are two sides, one is a homeowner that would understand the easement and the other that would violate terms of an easement because they own the property and feel like they can do what they want. He noted that details of the ongoing maintenance for the easements are still being determined. DesLauriers stated that in regard to the park fees he could see that there is ongoing maintenance of the trails that would be needed for the public trail. Albers stated that this request seems to make a lot of sense. 4 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 6/13/2017 Meeting Minutes Nester stated that to ask for only five future homes would be a multiplier of 1.66 and that would not justify what the City is receiving in return. She believed this to be a reasonable request that she would support. White stated that this request meets the objectives of the ordinance and the amount of quality of the resources conserved would equate to the full density bonus and would still provide a rural residential feeling. She stated that she fully supports the full density bonus. Motion by Reid, seconded by Albers, to recommend approval of the Marx proposal with the conditions listed by City staff. Motion carries unanimously. White stated that she would have liked to see what the lake view would be from the looped trail and perhaps that would be helpful for the City Council presentation. Finke noted that the City Council will consider this application on July 5th. 5 Medina Park Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 6/21/2017 Meeting Minutes Wally and Bridget Marx — 2700-2900 Parkview Drive — Conservation Design Subdivision PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat — Park Dedication Review Scherer provided a brief staff report. He stated that the applicant is proposing a Conservation Design Planned Unit Development subdivision of three existing lots into six lots at 2700-2900 Parkview Drive. He noted that the City reviewed the concept plan this past winter. He stated that the primary changes in this plan from the concept plan were 1) moved lot 4's driveway to reduce impacts; 2) created a looped public trail; 3) proposed that individual owners would own the conservation outlots; 4) removal of some invasive/pioneering and replacement with native plantings. Scherer stated that the applicant identified a trail from Parkview north of the driveway through the woods to provide a view of School Lake. The updated plan identifies an extension of this trail along the north of the large wetland to the eastern property line. Scherer stated that staff has concerns with the ability for the public to access the proposed looped trail. He stated that a potential alternative would be to create a small trailhead on lots 1-2, which would allow for parking at Baker Park Reserve. He also noted that staff would need to confirm the usability of the east -west trail connection. Scherer showed the future facility planning map and noted that although there are no parks or trails identified in the area, the CD-PUD places a high importance on public access. Scherer explained the park dedication ordinance in terms of this application, noting that the city could require up to 10% of the buildable land, which would equate to about four acres, 8% of the pre -developed value, which would be approximately $24,000, or a combination. Scherer stated that staff does not recommend additional land dedication beyond the proposed trails. He recommended providing park dedication credit for trails and taking the remainder in cash -in -lieu. Jacob mentioned the need for a sign at the entrance of the trail. There was a general consensus by the Park Commission that the applicant should pay for the new public trail. Discussion took place about how to create a safe entrance point along Parkview Drive. Beddor asked if hikers could use Baker National Golf Course's parking lot. 1 Medina Park Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 6/21/2017 Meeting Minutes The Park Commission directed staff to look into ways in which two cars could park along Parkview safely so the passengers could walk safely walk along the road from their cars to the trail access point (trailhead). Scherer noted that if the city asks the applicant to build the public trail and grant trail easements that may likely exhaust most of the remaining cash -in -lieu of park dedication. Scherer stated that he would look at the property to see what the best entry point for the public trail from the standpoint of user safety. Park Commission agreed with staff s recommendations with the following conditions: 1. The public trail be created now at the applicant's expense 2. The public trail easement be secured for the future trail connecting Parkview Drive with Willow Drive. 3. The City look at moving the public trail access point closer to the parking lot driveway of Baker National Golf Course. 4. A sign be created to mark the access point for the public trail. 5. Staff reviews the feasibility of putting some parking by the side of the road for at least a couple cars. 6. Create walkway alongside of Parkview from the trail parking or golf course entrance to make it safer for people that want to walk to the public trail. 2 Medina City Council Excerpt from 2/7/2017 Meeting Minutes Wally Marx — Conservation Design Subdivision PUD Concept Plan — 2500-2900 Parkview Drive (7:46 p.m.) Johnson noted that this was first brought forward to the Council in 2010/2011 but the property was found to be in agricultural preserve and therefore had to wait until 2016. Sparks stated that the property is currently three parcels that would be proposed to be developed into six lots. He stated that of the 90 acres, about 70 acres would be in easement and of that 40 percent would qualify for the buildable acre clause. He stated that this property is currently zoned and guided for rural residential use. He stated that the property includes two areas of moderate quality maple basswood forest and a good quality tamarack swamp land that were identified in the open space report. He noted that those elements would be proposed to be conserved. He explained the purpose of the ordinance, which creates and protects the conservation ordinance. He stated that the base density of the three parcels would allow three lots, and therefore this would be a 200 percent density bonus. He noted that they are proposing conservation of 77.6 percent of the site. He provided additional details on the lot layouts, access, and septic locations. He stated that the purpose of a concept plan is for the applicant to gain input from the Commissions and Council in regard to what they would be expecting when the applicant submits their actual application. He noted that the staff conditions were included in the packet along with the comments of the Planning and Park Commissions. He stated that a neighboring property owner submitted a letter stating that they did not like the number of units proposed for the property. Martin referenced the applicant's concept plan and the four septic sites, asking for clarification on locations and the types of trees in those areas. Sparks noted that the specific area had boxelder trees. Cousineau asked if the trees could be restored to create a corridor. Sparks agreed that the area is lower quality but could be restored to a higher quality with some work. He noted that restoration of some of the woodlands would improve the quality. Martin referenced the staff concept plan and asked where on the property homes could be placed. She asked for, and received, clarification on certain elements of the plans. She referenced a man-made wetland on the property and asked if there is a difference in protection. Mark Gronberg, Gronberg and Associates, replied that the wetland has been delineated as a wetland and therefore there is no difference. Laura Domyancich, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, stated that if there is a wetland on the plan that has been delineated as a wetland but does not have a classification it would not have the same protection as a wetland. She stated that if preservation of the wetland is desired a MnRam would need to be done for the wetland to determine a management plan and classification. Kent Williams, 1632 Homestead Trail, stated that he is speaking on behalf of the applicants at their request. He stated that the applicant submitted a narrative with the concept plan, noting that this is the third time Mr. Marx has come to the Council with an attempted project. He stated that under any measure this project is one that provides significant value to the City. He stated that the Marx family purchased the land in 1998 and spent 20 years restoring the property, as it 1 Medina City Council Excerpt from 2/7/2017 Meeting Minutes was previously a pig farm. He stated this is one of the last few groves of trees left and would be protected. He stated that the Marx family has proposed to put 40 percent of buildable land into conservation easement, noting that there has not been a request that has come before the City with that high of a percentage. He noted that the percentage of buildable land is quite low already for this property and therefore this is a significant sacrifice. He stated that the conservation elements that are being protected through the easements should justify the density bonus itself. He noted that it is important to note that on top of the buildable land, the Marx family would be conserving another 60 acres of unbuildable land. He noted that they are not asking for a large number of homes in return for this conservation, they simply believe in the conservation of the land. He highlighted the conservation benefits that would be provided through this proposal. He highlighted what would happen under normal development of this property, which would create three lots and the future landowners could do a lot of things with their land, outside of building, that could be detrimental to the natural features. He stated that this is a harmonious plan with a single easement holder and would provide a benefit to the City. He stated that this provides more conserved land and less buildable homes than any application before. He referenced the park dedication requirement for the horse trail around the lake. He stated that the lake is entirely private at this time, along with the horse trail, and is used by invitation only and not used by the public. He stated that there has been pushback from the neighbors on the lake that they do not want that path open to the public at large and those neighbors would close their segments of the trail. He also noted that there would be issues with parking for people attempting to access the trail. He noted that there was a lengthy discussion at the Park Commission meeting. He noted that an alternate trail location was discussed in the southern portion of the property, which would keep the trail away from the homes. He noted that the intent then would be for it to be a nature trail. He stated that the Park Commission wanted the ability to provide trail connection to the properties east and west. He noted that there are not currently trails to the east or west. He noted that the applicant is conserving not only the required buildable land but also 60 additional acres of non -buildable land and therefore asked that the Council waive the requirement for park dedication. He stated that a lot of thought went into this concept plan. Martin referenced a gravel drive and asked if the existing configuration would continue or whether there would be a relocation. It was noted this is the existing horse trail. She stated that on the applicant's proposal she noticed buildable area that is going into conservation and compared that to the staff plan. She also noted what seemed to be a straight line of trees and asked for more information. Wally Marx replied that the line of trees is very straight because they purchased the land in 1998 and there were 400 hogs on the property before they purchased the property. He noted that the pigs devastated the land. He stated that in order to create more conserved land they have limited the housing footprint to one acre each. Charlie Schroder, 2910 Parkview, stated that they are the neighbor immediately to the north and are present to understand what is going on. He stated that they are new neighbors and have found this background information to be helpful. He asked how the PUD is superior to the conventional development, as he did not quite see how the land would be better under the PUD. He stated that having the trail open to the public would be problematic with parking. He stated that a north/south trail on Parkview would be objectional. He stated that this seems like a lot of density relative to a conventional development plan. Pederson stated that he was on the Council in 2011 and stated that this request is considerably better than that request. He stated that he has concerns with the proximity to the lake. He 2 Medina City Council Excerpt from 2/7/2017 Meeting Minutes stated that the trail would be problematic because the other property owners do not want that. He stated that with the trails at Baker Park he was unsure why additional trails would be needed here. He stated that it would be difficult to give up park dedication, noting that he does not have any interest in dropping park dedication. Mitchell provided background information on the Long Lake Hounds. Anderson agreed that this is a substantially better plan than what was presented in 2011. He stated that he does have concerns with the closeness of lots one and two. He stated that it seems that the buildable acreage is in pieces rather than one contiguous piece and therefore could not find how it would benefit the City. He agreed that the park dedication should not be waived. Williams stated that they attempted to not make the conservation areas fragmented. He noted that the green and yellow areas are proposed for preservation, identifying corridors. Martin stated that lots one and two seem close together and would also need a variance. She stated that other than that she likes the fragmentation of the lots as it seems more rural and less planned. She stated that there was conscious thought from the applicant to preserve land in corridors. She stated that she would want the conservation areas to be placed in outlots to minimize the amount of conserved areas within the lots. She asked which areas were the highest value in terms on conservation, noting that the tamarack swamp is high quality but would be protected as a wetland. She stated that the maple basswood forest would protect the tree line and view shed from the road. She stated that perhaps there could be a trail that would provide a vista of the lake. She stated that she would avoid the horse trail. She stated that she would preserve a trail further east that could be built out at a further time. She stated that she would give park dedication for trails that are built. She stated that she would like to see protection of the wooded areas more and would recommend the staff suggestion for layout with a trail that could overlook the lake. She stated that she would like to see the setbacks met and would keep the roads out of the middle woodland area to loop around a bit more as staff recommended. Cousineau stated that she appreciates that staff moved lot three to the southern part, but noted that it seems that may be crowded. She stated that she would support a trail becoming public overlooking a vista of the lake but would not support the horse trail. She stated that park dedication is important. Mitchell stated that he just does not understand it, as it seems that this is attempting to get ten pounds of flour into a five -pound sack. He stated that in the rural area the effort is for less houses. He stated that he does not see any public benefit to this land. He stated that he does not understand how the little bits of yellow on the map would be justification for double density. He stated that three homes would preserve the most trees, the animal corridor, the marshes, and wetlands. He stated that he does not see that this meets the minimum ordinance standards. Williams stated that there seems to be a misunderstanding of what could be done and what could not be done under conservation or regular ownership. He stated that the property owner could buy wetland mitigation credits and fill wetlands. He stated that the natural elements could be left to the whim of a future land owner or they could choose to protect and conserve the rare and disappearing elements that exist on the land. He stated that you would not get the same 3 Medina City Council Excerpt from 2/7/2017 Meeting Minutes level of land stewardship and management under this request compared to traditional development. Cousineau stated that if you go to five homes, there is already one home and you would only be adding four homes. She stated that this is a large area of land and therefore would be comfortable with some additional homes. Anderson asked if the applicant feels that they received feedback from the Council. Williams stated that it seems that there is some antagonism towards the ordinance itself rather than the project. He stated that if you hate the ordinance you can say no to every request, noting that there will not be a lot of these requests. He stated that it does not seem that this should rise or fall on five or six homes when the applicants would be conserving 70 acres of land. He stated that the conservation aspects on this request far exceed what was gained through Stonegate, and this request is only asking for three additional homes. He appreciated the honest feedback but felt that the Council is providing negative comments against the ordinance itself. Cousineau stated that lots one and two do not conform to the DNR shoreline regulations. She agreed that this was a hot topic tonight but noted that there would have to be some conformity in order to discuss the 200 percent density bonus. Williams stated that if the parcels should be expanded, it would make them more saleable as they would gain more shoreland. He explained that the lots are smaller because of the conserved shoreline. He did not feel they would have trouble presenting the case to the DNR. Mitchell stated that it seems that they could just do a PUD to approve additional lots. Batty stated that is not what the applicant has requested and would have different standards for review. Mitchell stated that he did not understand how this would meet the objectives of the conservation design ordinance. Michael Pressman stated that he has spent about 25 years on conservation development, as this is his career. He stated that he began looking at this property when he was working with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and he made an offer at that time to purchase a conservation easement to secure what is proposed to the City for free. He stated that he secured an easement to the north. He stated that he was attracted to this property because of the natural features of the site. He noted that while the yellow area may seem small that is connected to the green areas that would also be preserved. He stated that he joined his profession to look ahead and ensure conservation when changes come in the future. He stated that this project has come before the Council three times now. He stated that this site contains areas identified in the City's open space plan and meet the requirements of the ordinance. Martin asked how many homes could be built on this property if this property were rezoned in the future as single family detached or attached. 4 Subject: Conservation Design- PUD 2700-2900 Parkview Drive Medina Planning Commission, City Council and Staff: Pamela and I, the owners of 2910 Parkview Drive, neighbors immediately to the north of the Marx property, have reviewed the PUD General Plan as well as the previous Concept Plan and have the following observations. On a personal level, our decision to move into this area was based on a desire to have more privacy and quiet. The current Rural Residential (RR -Rural Residential) zoning was a factor in this decision. We suspect our neighbors felt the same way when they moved here. We agree with Medina's approach to land use planning, conservation and water quality. Having served on and chaired the Orono Planning Commission, I understand the importance of these decisions. The proposal to change the zoning of these parcels to a Conservation District-PUD to increase lot density to the maximum in exchange for certain conservation allowances does not fully address the critical issues. First, the current RR zoning and the difficult nature of those parcels with respect to development effectively maintains the conservation aspects of the area. This is a good example of how thoughtful prior ordinance construction and zoning can work. No action needs to be taken to retain the area's unique qualities. The argument that this area is within the MUSA boundary and will be sewered with resulting very large increases in density is probably overstated. This area is very unlikely to be the target of Met Council development, for the very reasons outlined in the various development proposals and by observation: presence of Old Growth Woods, Tamarack Swamp and the pairs of nesting swans, the egrets and herons. The proposal of a public trail near the Old Growth Woods seems problematic. There is no parking along Parkview Drive, meaning that an interested party will park at Baker Golf and walk on the road. Anyone driving on Parkview witnessing golfers late for tee times will consider this a risky undertaking. The sight lines for walkers (or bikers) on Parkview are not great. The walking trail does not show as crossing the horse trail, however it is very close, such that a path to the horse trail will likely develop soon. The School Lake property owners' informal understanding regarding the horse trail access will likely be altered to avoid the liability of increased traffic. Baker Park Reserve's 2,700 acres provides ample public access to lakes, walking, biking and horse trails, golf, skiing and a host of other year round activities with plenty of parking. The addition of Lots 1 and 2, where Pamela and I are most affected, and the lot width variances that may still be required (with the perimeter setback reset) is another indication that this plan is aggressive. We were gratified that the earlier January concept discussion of this plan generally discouraged two lots in that area as too intense for the rural residential nature of the area. The disturbance of the soils of lots close to the lake, especially Lots 3 and 4, may have unknown consequences, given their historical agricultural usage. This probably needs further study. We understand property owners have rights and there is a balance between those rights and planning. School Lake is a unique area. The tradeoff between increasing density and protection of ecologically valuable land seems difficult here because the land in question is basically protected by virtue of its inability to be built upon. Subdivision would be currently limited to three lots, one already built on, as we understand it. This makes for significant land protection, based on existing ordinances. We appreciate the work that has gone into this by the applicant, the Staff, the Commission, and the Council. Respectfully, Charles and Pamela Schroeder 2910 Parkview Drive, Medina CYNTHIA PIPER 2905 Willowood Farm Road Hamel, MN 55340 763 478-9900 Cell 612 868-2190 cindypiper46r�gmail.com September 11, 2017 To: Medina City Councii; Re: School Lake Nature Preserve/Wally & Bridget Marx Dear Council, I have been in discussion with Wally Marx for the last several years regarding his intention to subdivide his property on School Lake. My husband and I are owners of property on School Lake. Mr. Marx has shared with me the Land Stewardship Plan prepared by the Minnehaha Watershed District and the Conservation Easement documentation. Here are my comments. Some history; There currently is a trail that fourteen landowners properties abut the shoreline and have agreed to allow local access to walkers and horse riders. The trail has been in existence since the early 1960's. Each time a property has been sold, I have contacted the new owners and requested permission. It has always been granted. The Marx proposal to continue the trail with the proposed plan is much desired by those who use it. The adjoining landowners appreciate the language on page 10 of the Land Stewardship Plan. "an existing private horse trail, that extends through the property along the shoreline of School Lake and continues around the lake through neighboring properties, will be retained for private use with dedicated private easements for access and maintenance". "The public access trail shall be configured so that it does not interfere with existing private house trail". Thanks to the Marx plan and hopefully to a positive vote by the Council, Medina will continue to preserve its rural character. The adjoining neighbors and those who use the trail truly appreciate this proposal. Hopefully there will be more plans like this that allow the beloved trails to continue to exist. Most sincerely, Cindy Piper cc. Wally & Bridget Marx. YY SB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 I Minneapolis, MN 55416 I (763) 541-480011 June 8, 2017 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Marx PUD Concept — Engineering Review City Project No. LR-17-205 WSB Project No. 03433-170 Dear Mr. Finke: We have reviewed the Marx PUD Concept application and plans dated May 12, 2017. The applicant proposes to construct a six single family parcels. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Site Plan & Civil 1. Note proposed driveway grades. 2. Show the location of the public access trail referenced in the narrative. 3. With future submittals, please provide the following: a. A drawing showing or exhibit showing fire truck turning movements and access through site. b. Soil borings or hand augers shall be provided to confirm that 12-inches of class 5 and a geotextile fabric exist. c. Show a proposed street typical section detail on the plans. With future submittals submit cross sections along the roadway at least every 50 feet to confirm the construction limits of the proposed road widening. d. Add curve data and roadway grades to the proposed road profile on Sheet 5. Stormwater 4. Show stormwater treatment locations within each lot and consider grading implications. Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.como Marx PUD Concept — Engineering Review June 8, 2017 Page 2 5. With future submittals, please provide the following: a. Stormwater calculations showing compliance with the City's rate control, water quality, infiltration and freeboard requirements. b. Documentation that a permit application has been sent to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Provide the final permitting documents prior to the start of construction. c. Indicate existing high water levels and overflow routes of School Lake and the large wetland complexes on the plans in order to evaluate compliance with the freeboard requirement. d. The development is proposed on what appears to be the overflow route for School Lake to the south, labeled Outlot A and I. Verify adequate freeboard is provided to future development and that the capacity of the EOF is not impacted. Wetlands 6. Wetland C is shown entirely within Lot 5. Provide an easement to fully encompass this wetland area including the appropriate buffers. 7. It appears wetland impacts are being avoided to a great extent, but provide a more detailed plan showing the roadway to Lot 4 as that passes through a very narrow area between Wetlands E and F. 8. Provide appropriate documentation of compliance with WCA for any proposed wetland impacts. 9. Wetland H should be connected to Wetland F — the final approved delineation did not include Wetland H, simply one connected wetland named F. 10. It does not appear the applicant will meet the minimum 30' buffer width required on the north side of Wetland B. 11. The applicant is proposing wetland management classifications that differ from those shown City of Medina's Wetland Management Classification map. The applicant provided a document outlining the proposed classifications on June 6, 2017. Following a review of the document, the City agrees with the proposed wetland management classifications. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES, INC. Loren Kohnen, Pres. Metro West Inspection Services, Inc. Box 248 Loretto, MN 55357 May 26, 2017 To: Debra Peterson From: Loren Kohnen Item: School Lake Nature Preserve Wallace Marx Six lot proposal East of Parkview Drive, SW side of School Lake (763) 479-1720 FAX (7 63) 479-3090 Mtrowst76@aol.corn have reviewed the proposal and checked the septic design and locations. All will meet code and must be protected before any road or driveway construction begins. The design of the driveways must be submitted and approved by the Fire Chief and Fire Marshal (Loretto Fire Department) before final approval of the plat by Medina City Council. Most driveways are very long and though poor soil. Respectfully, Loren Kohnen Fire Marshal Box 248, Loretto, Minnesota 55357 SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE CD-PUD AMENDED GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT Wallace and Bridget Marx ("the Applicants") respectfully submit the following Amended General Plan of Development in compliance with Medina City Code § 827.35, General Plan of Development. This Amended General Plan of Development is intended to amend and supplement the General Plan of Development previously submitted on May 12, 2017. This Amended General Plan of Development is supplemented by and should be read in conjunction with the Project Narrative and Concept Plan previously submitted on December 9, 2016, and the General Plan of Development, preliminary plat, and other materials previously submitted on May 12, 2017, which are incorporated by reference (to the extent not modified by this Amended Application). The relevant documents were amended to reflect compliance with the amendments to the CD-PUD ordinance passed on July 5, 2017, after the original documents were submitted to the City. The Applicants propose to place approximately 70 acres of the subject property, including 11.76 acres of buildable land, into a permanent conservation easement. This represents 40.1 percent of the buildable land, and about 78 percent of the total land on the property. The easement area will include 21.22 acres (out of a total of approximately 25 acres) of the tamarack swamp and Maple -Basswood Old Growth Big Woods fragments found significant by Hennepin County.l The easement will also include large swaths of land to preserve wildlife corridors to School Lake. A well -placed public access trail will allow members of the community to enter and enjoy some of the most valuable and unique parts of the property, all of which have been restricted to private access until now. As an incentive for the above, and to help alleviate the economic loss from committing 1 The remaining acreage of these conservation assets lies within a separate parcel that is not part of this Application. 40% of their limited buildable land to conservation, the Applicants ask for a full density bonus of three additional lots. Although much of the proposed conservation area currently is covered by city and state wetland buffer rules, stricter Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD") regulations will provide even greater protection, and will include land that currently is unprotected by wetland buffer rules. The conservation areas will be protected by a Land Stewardship Plan and Conservation Easement Agreement. The MCWD will own the easement, and will have the right to periodically inspect the property and ensure that conservation areas are being properly maintained. Individual lot owners will own the conservation areas in fee, and will be signatories to the easement agreement with the MCWD. Funds for restoration and maintenance of the conservation areas will be obtained from the proceeds of sales of individual lots, and will be supplemented with annual dues to be paid by individual lot owners into an escrow account controlled by the MCWD. The applicants strongly believe that "pride of ownership" and individual legal responsibility imposed by the easement agreements will help ensure that the standards imposed by the conservation agreements will be maintained. The Applicants have met with the MCWD regarding the necessary permits and will file applications for same once approval for the project has been granted. Any storm water management and other required improvements required by the City will be implemented prior to the sale of any lots. No grading or other improvements are anticipated to be required prior to the sale of the lots, other than possible driveway installation and box elder removal. The Applicants anticipate that expansion of the 2 existing driveway to the Marx house will take place after Lots 3 and 4 are sold, with the funds required to complete the expansion obtained from the proceeds of such sales. 1. Property Address. 2700-2900 Parkview Drive, Medina, MN. 2. Zoning Classifications. The property is presently zoned as Rural Residential (RR -Rural Residential). The Applicants request a zoning change to Conservation Design-PUD District ("CD-PUD"). When the project is completed, the zoning classification most comparable to the proposed development will continue to be Rural Residential. The primary modification needed from the comparable zoning classification is flexibility with respect to the requirement of five acres of contiguous suitable soils pursuant to § 826.25 subd. 2(a). 3. Property Owners: Wallace A. and Bridget A. Marx 2700 Parkview Drive Medina, MN 55340 Mr. and Mrs. Marx jointly own the subject property in fee simple absolute, as husband and wife. 4. Preliminary Plat. See attached amended preliminary plat prepared by Gronberg & Associates. 5. Preliminary plans: see attached amended preliminary plans prepared by Gronberg & Associates. 6. Legal descriptions: This property is composed of three separate parcels: a. PID 16 118 23 32 0002 2700 Parkview Drive Medina, MN 55340 3 Legal description: Commencing at the NE corner of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, thence South to the SE corner thereof, thence West to the SW corner thereof, thence North to the SW corner of Priscilla's Addition, thence easterly along the southerly line of said Addition to the SE corner thereof, thence North to the NE corner thereof, thence East to the beginning, except road. Section 16, Township 118, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. b. PID 16 118 23 31 0002 2702 Parkview Drive Medina, MN 55340 Legal description: The South 500 feet east of that part of the NE 1/4 of SW 1/4 lying West of the East 520 feet thereof. Section 16, Township 118, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. c. PID 16 118 23 23 0005 2900 Parkview Drive Medina, MN 55340 Legal description: That part of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 lying south of the North 845 feet thereof, except the West 417.42 feet of the North 208.71 feet of the South 213.71 feet thereof; also that part of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 lying West of the East 520 feet thereof and North of the South 500 feet thereof, except road. Section 16, Township 118, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 7. Tabulation of residential dwellings and expected population: This proposal provides for a total of six (6) residential dwellings, with an expected population of around eighteen (18), assuming an average of three (3) persons per household. See City of Medina 2030 Comprehensive Plan at 3-3 & Table 3-A (citing 2000 census information showing an average of 3.06 persons per household in Medina). The proposal adds only three houses and approximately nine (9) people compared to conventional development under existing regulations. 4 Because the property is within the Metropolitan Council's long term -sewer service area, it likely will receive sewer service at some point in the future. When this occurs, the property probably will not keep its low -density "Rural Residential" classification. With 29 acres of buildable land, and assuming a low density residential classification of 2-3.5 units per acre, conventional sewered development would result in 58-102 residential dwellings, or 174-306 people (again, based on an assumption of three (3) persons per household). If the property were rezoned to Residential Mid -Density (R3), which has a minimum lot size of 8,750 feet and a maximum lot size of 12,500 feet, the range would be from 99-141 residential dwellings, or 297-423 people. 8. Preliminary grading and site alteration plan: see attached plans prepared by Mark Gronberg & Associates. 9. Timeline for development: 12/9/16 Application filed 1/9/17 Planning Commission Concept Plan Presentation 2/7/17 City Council Concept Plan Presentation 5/12/17 Application for Preliminary Approval filed 6/13/17 Planning Commission Meeting (CD-PUD) 7/18/17 City Council Meeting (CD-PUD) 8/1/17 Final City Approvals 8/15/17 MCWD Permits granted 8/15/19 Estimated residential occupancy of Lots 1-4 10. A statement summarizing all changes made to previously -submitted documents: Since their application was filed last December, the Applicants have made a 5 number of changes based on suggestions they received from the Planning Commission, the Park Commission, the City Council, the City Planner, and the anticipated easement holder, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD"). These changes include the following: a. Conservation area ownership. The Applicants propose that all of the conservation easement area be owned in fee by the individual residential homeowners, rather than landowners plus one or more homeowner associations. The Applicants and the MCWD agree that this will simplify administration of the conservation easement agreement. The Applicants submit that landowners will take their conservation obligations more seriously if they are held directly responsible as signatories to the easement agreement. Appropriate signage and effective enforcement by the MCWD will help ensure that landowners do not conduct impermissible activities in protected areas. b. Tree replacement program. Although the MCWD does not believe significant restoration of the property is needed, the Land Stewardship Plan includes a program for replacing box elder trees and other invasive species with higher -quality trees, and dedicates funds for this purpose. c. Escrow. An escrow account controlled by the MCWD will be established and maintained with funds paid by landowners both at closing and on an annual basis, to pay for the tree replacement program and any needed maintenance. d. Public trail. A public access trail is proposed, with an entrance just north of the road near the Maple -Basswood Old Growth Big Woods, heading 6 east-northeast along the road and then northeast into Outlot C and heading on toward School Lake, circling in a loop, and then connecting back to the original trail. This trail will allow the public to view the Maple -Basswood Old Growth Big Woods, the Tamarack Swamp, and School Lake, none of which are currently available to the public. The public trail is configured so that it does not interfere with the existing horse trail. The public trail is offered in addition to the general east -west easement in the southern part of the property that was requested by the Park Commission. One possible route for a southern trail is indicated on the amended preliminary plat. e. Lot 1 Perimeter setback. The perimeter setback for Lot 1 now complies with existing regulations. f. Outlots. All conservation areas are included as Outlots A-K on the concept plan (the green and yellow areas). g• Lot 4 driveway and septic line. The driveway and septic line for Lot 4 has been re -drawn to avoid Wetland F. Rusty Olson has confirmed that the new location does not present any difficulties. h. Minimum lot size. To comply with the amended CD-PUD ordinance passed by the City Council on July 5, 2017 requiring that each lot be a minimum of 2.5 square acres in size, and assuming (based on discussion with the City Planner) that "lot" means "fee simple absolute lot unencumbered by a conservation easement," the lot lines have been re -drawn so that every such lot meets the new 2.5-acre minimum. Because we were able to subtract acreage from 7 lots in excess of the 2.5-acre minimum to make up for the acreage that was added to the lot that did not meet the 2-5-acre minimum, the reorientation of lot lines did not result in a net decrease of the percent or actual acres of buildable land donated for conservation purposes, or the percent or actual acres of land covered by the conservation easement, as described in the original application. The requisite number of copies of maps showing existing conditions, a soils overlay, amended preliminary plat, preliminary road plan, and simplified ownership map, along with copies of a draft Land Stewardship Plan and draft Conservation Easement Agreement, are submitted (or previously have been submitted) with this Amended General Plan of Development. 8 9/14/2017 SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE Wally and Bridget Marx — September 19, 2017 MEDINA CD-PUD DISTRICT Design flexibility depends upon the amount and quality of conservation area and how well the project achieves the following conservation objectives over conventional development: Objective One Protect/restore ecological function of native hardwood forests (e.g. Maple -Basswood) Objective Four Reserve connections between land and water ecological resources for habitat corridors Objective Two Protect/preserve lakes, streams, & wetlands beyond existing regulations Objective Five Reserve land for public/private trails to create connections to existing or planned trails Objective Three Protect/restore ecological resources, including priority areas on the Composite Open Space map Objectives Six & Seven (secondary) Protect scenic views and reserve land for public/private Open Space 1 9/14/2017 AMOUNT AND QUALITY OF CONSERVATION AREA CONSERVATION EASEMENT ACRES CONSERVATION ASSETS BUILDABLE DONATED Deer Hill Preserve School Lake Nature Preserve 89 (55% of total) 70 (78% of total) Tamarack/black ash wetland complex Tamarack bog Maple -Basswood Old -Growth remnants School Lake and shore line 35.6 40.7 AMOUNT AND QUALITY OF CONSERVATION AREA • Hennepin County foresters: the tamarack wetland complex and Maple -Basswood Old - Growth Big Woods are high priority conservation areas • School Lake -- a key MCWD conservation area and important animal habitat • Current regs protect about 49 acres • Conservation easement will protect nearly 70 acres — 42% more land than current regs • More restrictive MCWD buffer rules will apply to all wetlands 2 9/14/2017 AMOUNT AND QUALITY OF CONSERVATION AREA • "Old -Growth Big Woods" -- natural forest developed >/= 120 years w/o severe disturbance • Better animal habitat, resiliency, scientific value, & aesthetic/spiritual appeal • MNRI: privately -owned old -growth fragments "are likely the highest priority sites to consider [for] acquisition and protection in the near future" • Only 4% remain in MN • Only 8 publicly accessible sites in MN • All 3 Marx old -growth fragments will be publicly accessible OBJECTIVE ONE Protect/restore the ecological function of native hardwood forests (e.g. Maple -Basswood) Conventional Development: • 15% of "Significant Trees," including Old - Growth trees, can be cut w/o a tree placement plan • Even more trees can be cut with a plan CD-PUD: • No cutting without prior MCWD approval • Invasive box elder trees replaced with higher -quality trees 3 9/14/2017 OBJECTIVE TWO Protect/preserve lakes, streams & wetlands beyond existing regulations Conventional Development: • Less restrictive Medina wetland buffers • Wetlands can be reduced with mitigation credits • Cutting & other activity allowed outside "shore impact zone" CD-PUD: • More restrictive MCWD buffers • No wetland reduction • All areas protected by the conservation easement OBJECTIVE THREE Protect/restore ecological resources, including priority areas on the Composite Open Space map Conventional Development: • Fencing, mowing, etc. relatively unrestricted • Old -Growth trees can be cut w/o replacement, up to 15% of all "Significant Trees" on property CD-PUD: • No fencing w/o MCWD approval • No mowing w/o MCWD approval • No cutting w/o MCWD approval 4 9/14/2017 OBJECTIVE FOUR Reserve ecological connections between land and water ecological resources for habitat corridors Conventional Development: • Ecological connections not preserved • Less restrictive Medina wetland buffer rules • Areas outside "shore impact zone" unprotected CD-PUD: • Existing ecological connections preserved • More restrictive MCWD wetland buffer rules • Areas between wetlands and shore protected by conservation easement OBJECTIVE FIVE Reserve land for public/private trails to create connections to existing or planned trails Conventional Development: • No public trails • No connection to planned or existing trails • Existing bridle path can be eliminated CD-PUD: • Two public trails • One east -west connection to planned trails • Existing bridle path is protected 5 9/14/2017 OBJECTIVES SIX & SEVEN (SECONDARY) Protect scenic views and viewsheds, and reserve land for public/private Open Space Conventional Development: • Cutting is relatively unrestricted • Fencing, structures, etc. can obstruct views CD-PUD: • No cutting or other activity w/o MCWD approval • Public trails will allow scenic views • 70 acres of Open Space, in perpetuity FUTURE CONVENTIONAL DEVELOPMENT Met Council Long Term Water Service Area map - 20+ acres open for conventional sewer development by 2040 Conventional Development: • Low -Density Residential -- 2-3.5/acre, or 40-70+ lots • Mid -Density Residential -- 3-5/acre, or 60-100+ lots CD-PUD: • 0.3/acre, for a total of 6 lots, in perpetuity 6 9/14/2017 The Marx property is "exceptional" and merits a full density bonus Deer Hill Preserve School Lake Nature Preserve CONSERVATION ACRES DONATED NATIVE CONSERVATION ASSETS 89 (55% of total) Tamarack bog 70 (78% of total) Tamarack/black ash wetland complex Maple -Basswood Old -Growth remnants School Lake and shore line % BUILDABLE DONATED 35.6 40.7 PUBLIC TRAIL Yes Yes CONSERVATION RESTORATION Yes Yes UNMOLESTED WETLANDS No Yes BASE LOTS BONUS LOTS DENSITY BONUS TOTAL LOTS 22 19 1.86x 41 3 3 2x 6 7 Marx Woods Forest Analysis Authors: Mike Reinikainen and Dave Thill Introduction A small proportion of the original Maple -Basswood forest cover -type remains in Hennepin County, and some of the best opportunities to preserve remnants of this forest type from future development exist in western portions of the county. The importance of preserving these stands of trees lies in the fact they offer ecological, economic, and social benefits to Hennepin county citizens that are nearly impossible to replace without significant input of resources and time. Benefits of mature stands of trees include, carbon and nutrient storage, oxygen production, stormwater management and erosion control, recreational opportunities, and critical habitat for native flora and fauna. Hennepin County has identified 25.23 acres of the 37.42 acre parcel (PID# 1611823320002) owned by Wally Marx at 2700 Parkview Drive, Medina, MN as being ecologically significant and within a state and county -identified natural resource corridor. The parcel harbors three stands of interest; an 11 acre tamarack wetland complex, a nearly pure one acre silver maple stand, and a 14 acre maple -basswood remnant. The tamarack wetland complex has previously been identified as ecologically significant as we are at the southern edge of that species range and there are only a handful of similar native plant communities in the county. The silver maple stand is quite rare locally and unique given the topography and hydrology of the site. The 14 acre Maple -basswood stand, hereafter referred to as Marx Woods, is classified as a southern rnesic sugar maple — basswood — (bitternut hickory) forest (MHs39a) using the MN DNR Ecological Classification System for Native Plant Communities (MNDNR 2003). This was a once common and extensive forest -type that has been Fragmented and is now underrepresented on the landscape, especially in the mature or old -growth stages of development. Methods Hennepin County Forestry and Natural Resource Staff collected data from Marx Woods on May 24th 2016 to determine the quality and growth stage of the forest. Data were collected from four prism plots systematically installed ever 132 feet from a random start. Within the prism plot, live and dead tree size and species were collected to estimate tree density and basal area. At three of the plots downed deadwood data were collected using the line -intercept method and converted to a volume per acre value. Species presence and cover was estimated at all four plots. Data were summarized in the office and compared to available benchmarks from regional forest research literature. Findings Hale et al. (1999) examined old -growth and mature Maple -Basswood forests from around Minnesota to better describe what elements of these forests set them apart from disturbed and early successional Maple -Basswood forests. Examination of 21 regional Maple -Basswood forests, including stands at nearby Baker Park Reserve and Wolsfeld Woods SNA, revealed that mature and old -growth maple - basswood stands have a significantly higher area occupied by trees (or live tree basal area) and a higher level of accumulated deadwood (downed as well as standing dead or "snags"). Table 1 is a comparison for key compositional and structural forest traits identified by Hale et al. as indicative of mature and old -growth forests of this type in the region. We have included Marx Woods for comparison. The data indicates that on 3 out of 6 measures of forest composition and structure, Marx woods compares really well with the old -growth stands from the Hale et al. (1999) study. Floral diversity approximates mature and old -growth conditions. Live tree basal area, representing the area occupied by trees, is significantly greater than mature and old -growth forests. Similarly, the proportion of large diameter trees (>24" diameter at breast height, or DBH) is substantially greater than that observed in regional old growth. These measures all indicate that this stand is indeed unique, and taken with the fact the property lies within an ecological corridor identified by the county, this stand is a strong candidate for preservation. Further, given bark and growth form characteristics of the large diameter trees present, we would estimate the oldest trees in this stand to be in excess of 150 years old; this is a forest condition not easily replicated. Table 1. Comparison of forest measures used to distinguish mature and old -growth forest stages including field collected data from Marx Woods. Those characteristics at Marx Woods that are similar to Measure Species diversity (evenness) Standing deadwood (snags) Downed deadwood (logs) Coarse deadwood (snags+logs) Live tree basal area Proportion of trees > 30' DBH Density of trees Variable Shannon's H' index cu. ft. per acre cu. ft. per acre cu. ft. per acre sq. ft. per acre percent trees per acre Stand -type Mature Old -growth Marx Woods 0.79 0.87 0.83 114 386 62 572 786 64 700 1258 126 109 135 160 3 6 15 144 137 100 mature and old -growth forests are in bold. Recommendations This stand is no doubt unique and worth protecting, but it is not untrammeled and is in need of some forest management and restoration. Table 1 reveals that this stand is lacking in deadwood, a hallmark and the strongest predictor of mature and old -growth forest. Deadwood is important for floral and faunal habitat as well as water retention and nutrient cycling. Large diameter stumps were located on site, indicating trees were harvested in the past. Wally Marx noted that removals did take place to reduce fire risk following a blow -down event in the late 1990s. Deadwood is now significantly lacking in this stand. Figure 1 further demonstrates how Marx Woods differs from regional mature and old -growth forest in that it lacks trees in the middle diameter classes (i.e. 12-19.9") when compared to regional mature or old -growth. Grazing likely occurred on site as floral diversity is lower than expected. Only 21 native ground layer plants were identified on the site, and those plants were present in rather low abundance or cover. Potential grazing in the early- to mid -twentieth century may have halted forest development as ground cover and hardwoods seedlings were consumed by livestock. The lack of floral diversity could also be explained by the presence of invasive earthworms. This, however, would not explain the lack of trees in mid -diameter classes. Regardless of the stand history, Marx Woods displays important characteristics of mature and old - growth forests that takes hundreds of growing seasons to reproduce. This stand is worth preserving for the established canopy, the high number of large trees present per acre, the floral diversity that does exist, and the manageable number and cover of invasive species present. If preservation is achieved on this property, steps should be taken to maintain and enhance deadwood pools, control buckthorn and garlic mustard, and increase floral diversity in both richness (i.e., number of species) and abundance (i.e., cover) in the ground cover layer. 5CP/ 45% tri v 40% m 35% 0 30•i O 25% c O 20% O 15% a 2 1o°0 a. 5°0 0% 1- A -7.9 II 8-11.9 12-15.9 �1 16-19.9 20-2' Diameter at breast height (4.5 ft. in inches) Figure 1. Diameter distribution comparing forest structure of Marx Woods to average regional mature and old -growth maple basswood forests. Table 2. Species observed with tree species in bold. Species observed Avens Bitternut hickory Black cherry Buckthorn Bur oak Cleavers Common nightshade Cutleaf toothwort Dutchmen's breeches False rue anemone Garlic mustard Green ash Green briar Hackberry Ironwood Jack in the pulpit Large white trillium Moonseed Nannyberry Penn sedge Prickly gooseberry Wild leek Red cedar Red oak Solomon's seal Spring beauty Sugar maple Tartarian honeysuckle Virginia creeper Virginia waterleaf White oak Wild geranium Wild grape References Hale, C.M., J. Pastor, and K.A. Rusterholz. 1999. Comparison of structural and compositional characteristics in old -growth and mature, managed hardwood forests of Minnesota, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 29: 1479-1489. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2003. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota: the Laurentian Mixed Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, MNDNR, St. Paul, Minnesota. LAND STEWARDSHIP PLAN School Lake Nature Preserve Medina, Minnesota DRAFT 4 August 25, 2017 Prepared for: Wally Marx 2700 Parkview Drive Medina, MN 55340 Prepared by: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 1'Page TABLE OF CONTENTS (to be updated) INTRODUCTION 3-5 Conservation Design 3-4 Land Stewardship Plan 4-6 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6-8 Compilation of Existing Data 6 Field Reconnaissance 7 Findings 7-8 CONSERVATION DESIGN OF SCHOOL LAKE PRESERVE 8-9 Development Layout 8-9 Grading & Ecological Stormwater Management 10 Cultural Amenities 10 OWNERSHIP, CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES & LAND PROTECTION 11-18 School Lake Preserve Land Allocation 11 Development Area 11 City Park Land Dedication 12 Conservation Area 17-18 21Page LAND STEWARDSHIP PLAN SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE FINAL PLAT Medina, Minnesota INTRODUCTION Wally Marx proposes to develop 89.75 acres of land contained within three contiguous parcels in Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota following the City's Conservation Design — Planned Unit Development (CD-PUD) requirements. The project includes 6 single family sites and holds unique and important conservation values based on its regional location and variety of wetland, woodland, and shoreline habitats. These values are recognized by a number of local agencies, and Mr. Marx's goal is to create unique lots that preserve the natural resource values of the site, integrate the home sites into the landscape, and provide guidance for future management, and elective enhancement of the conservation areas by the fee owners or Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). Conservation Design The proposed development complies with the City of Medina's Conservation Design Development requirements as described in detail in subsequent sections and per City Code Section 827.51. Conservation Design (CD) — Purpose, which states: The purpose of this district is to preserve the City's ecological resources, wildlife corridors, scenic views, and rural character while allowing residential development consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Open Space Plan as updated from time to time. The specific conservation objectives of this district are to: 1. Protect the ecological function of native hardwood forests, lakes, streams, and wetlands. 2. Protect moderate to high quality ecologically significant natural areas. 3. Protect opportunities to make ecological connections between parks and other protected lands and ecologically significant natural areas. 4. Protect important viewsheds including scenic road segments. 5. Create public and private trails for citizens to access and enjoy Open Space resources. 6. Create public and private Open Space for citizens to access and enjoy. The proposed development also complies with City Code Section 827.57, Subd. 5 and 7, which define Conservation Area and Conservation Easement for purposes of the CD-PUD ordinance. 3'Page Land Stewardship Plan Per City of Medina Code Section 827.65, a Land Stewardship Plan (LSP) is required for the project. An LSP addresses the development, long-term use, maintenance, and insurance of the Conservation Area associated with a proposed development. More specifically, this Final LSP: (a) Defines ownership and methods of land protection. (b) Establishes necessary regular and periodic operation and maintenance responsibilities. (c) Estimates staffing needs, insurance requirements, and other costs associated with plan implementation and defines the means for funding the same on an on -going basis. This includes land management fees necessary to fund monitoring and management of the Conservation Easement by the easement holder. The fees have been found reasonable by the proposed easement holder. (d) Addresses the requirements of the future Conservation Easement holder. The following Land Stewardship Plan applies to the entire area contained within the Conservation Easement, unless otherwise stated. Mr. Marx intends to develop all residential lots at once. Restoration after Construction Related Activities Construction activities in development of the private lots may temporarily impact portions of the Conservation Area. The following summary generally describes how the fee owner anticipates coordinating site development and restoration activities concurrently: • The fee owner anticipates commencing site development in Fall 2017, weather permitting. • Staging areas in pre -determined locations will be constructed to accommodate construction and other activities and may temporarily impact portions of the Conservation Area. Once a staging area is no longer needed, the fee owner will remove the staging area and correct any damage in the Conservation Area to achieve conditions similar to those at the time of easement recording. • Utilities, including secondary septic sites, may be constructed as part of the development of the residential lots. Any construction activities that damage a Conservation Area will be corrected to achieve conditions similar to those at the time of easement recording. Any other land disturbance, not identified above, occurring with the development will be corrected to achieve conditions that mimic the cover type and density of cover present at the time of easement recording. The following sections address the City -required elements of the LSP. 4'Page EXISTING CONDITIONS Compilation of Existing Data The following existing data were compiled and reviewed to assess the natural, cultural, historic, and scenic character of the site and its surroundings: • MnDNR Ecological Classification System • MnDNR Minor Watershed boundaries • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)-listed Impaired Waters • Web Soil Survey (SSURGO Soil Survey data from USDA/NRCS) • Original Vegetation of Minnesota (pre -European vegetation mapping by Marshner/MnDNR) • MnDNR Rare Natural Features (from the Natural Heritage Information System, NHIS) • MnDNR Native Plant Communities (NPC) • MnDNR Sites of Biological Significance (SBS) • Regionally Significant Ecological Areas (RSEA) — both original mapping and 2008 update • MnDNR Regional Ecological Corridors — based on 2008 MLCCS data • Metro Conservation Corridors • Hennepin County Open Space Corridors and Priority Natural Resources Corridors • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) wetland mapping • MCWD Key Conservation Area mapping • Restoration Prioritization and Prediction Model (RePP) • Public conservation lands (e.g., public parks, Scientific and Natural Area (SNA), Wildlife Management Area (WMA)) • Historical and current aerial photographs (1937, 1957, 1960, 1962, 1967, 1969, 1971, 2000, 2015) • Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) mapping (based on discrete datasets from 2001, 2005, and 2008) • Wetlands (including delineated site wetlands, Hennepin County Wetland Inventory, and MCWD Functional Assessment of Wetlands (FAW)) • City of Medina Open Space Plan (2007) • Site parcel boundaries • Topographic contours (2-ft LiDAR data) and digital elevation model (DEM) • Minnesota Historical Society database report 5'Page Field Reconnaissance On December 5, 2016, Laura Domyancich (Minnehaha Creek Watershed District) conducted a field reconnaissance of the development area accompanied by David Thill of Hennepin County Natural Resources, Michael Pressman of Conservation Solutions, and the property owner, Wally Marx. Existing conditions (including landforms, slopes, wetland boundaries, drainage patters, erosion, etc.) were noted. In brief, the site is dominated by several small wetlands, moderate to high quality woodlands, restored prairie, and maintained formal gardens. Steep slopes were observed along the western edge of the site and in the northern portion of the site to the west of School Lake. Findings Ecological Context According to Minnesota's Ecological Classification System, the site is located in Minnesota's Big Woods Subsection of the Minnesota & NE Iowa Morainal Section, of the Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province. The site is within the Long Lake Creek sub -watershed, which drains into Lake Minnetonka (several bays of which are listed by the MPCA as "impaired"), then into the Minnehaha Creek and eventually the Mississippi River. Moderate slopes (<18%) exist in the northern portion of the site. Site soils consist of a variety of upland and wetland (i.e., hydric) soils, ranging from well drained to very poorly drained. Pockets of poorly drained soil are mapped throughout the site and are associated with the wetland areas. Prior to European settlement, the majority of the site was dominated by Big Woods (e.g., oak, maple, basswood, hickory, elm). Some of this original land cover type remains on the site. The southwestern portion of the site contains a 6-acre tamarack swamp, fringed by 12-acres of black ash swamp. The other 6 acres of wetland on site are dominated by narrow -leaf cattail and reed canary grass. The northern and western portions of the site include nearly 22-acres of maple - basswood forest. Regional Ecological Significance Remnant tamarack and black ash swamps and maple -basswood forests have been noted on the site and create a resource corridor between Minnesota County Biological Survey -identified mesic oak forest and maple -basswood forest to the northeast and a large minerotrophic tamarack swamp complex to the south. A Hennepin County Environmental Services report identified a one -acre nearly pure silver maple stand, a 14-acre maple basswood remnant, and an 11-acre tamarack wetland complex. Conifer swamps are a sensitive wetland type, susceptible to degradation resulting from invasive species, stormwater runoff, and hydrologic alterations. The property has been identified as a conservation priority in numerous plans and studies, including the following: 1. City of Medina Natural Resources Inventory: most of the property is identified as an Ecologically Significant Natural Area. Wage 2. Medina Open Space Plan: property and it natural areas are called out as Priority Areas 3. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Regionally Significant Terrestrial and Wetland Ecological Areas: property is part of a large complex identified as "Regionally Significant" by the MN DNR. Along with Baker Park and areas to the immediate north, it is one of a few large terrestrial and wetland complexes remaining in Hennepin County. 4. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan: property is identified as part of a District Conservation Priority of the Long Lake Subwatershed Plan, which is part of an important conservation corridor extending to the Wolsfeld Woods Scientific and Natural Area. 5. Hennepin Environmental Services: property is part of a conceptual greenway corridor system proposed by Hennepin County in 2008. The broader landscape includes a significant natural resource corridor that includes School Lake to the northeast and Baker Park Reserve to the west and southwest, and a larger tamarack swamp complex to the south. Cultural/Historical/Scenic Significance The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) database search did not identify cultural/historical resources on the site. Currently, there is only one home on the site, the residence of the property owner at 2700 Parkview Drive. Approximately 8 acres of the property has been developed into extensive formal gardens maintained by the property owner. Prior to Mr. Marx purchasing the property, the northernmost parcel was the site of a hog farm, which caused significant soil disturbance. Mr. Marx has completed restoration of this area, which is now the site of an apple orchard and restored prairie. Aerial Photograph Review The earliest available aerial photograph of the site is from September 1937. The photo shows an area on the northern portion of the site in row crop agriculture. The wetland complex around Miller Lake at the southern extent of the property is a mix of herbaceous vegetation with presumably tamarack and black ash in the center. School Lake appears to have no open water. A photo from 1957 shows that the area was likely dredged to create open water. Between the aerial photo year of 1937 and 1960, the farm site on the northern portion of the site was established. A review of more recent aerial photos from the early 1960s indicates that portions of the site consisted of row crop agricultural fields until around 1960-1962. The tamarack swamp and several apparent lowlands and drainageways were not cultivated. A wetland in the center of the site appears to have been expanded and deepened around 1967 and again in 2000, but has begun to fill in with cattails over the last 17 years. The formal gardens were installed in the early 2000s. Agricultural Records Prior to the Marx's purchase of the property in 1998-1999, the northern portions of the property served as a 400 animal hog farm, which caused significant soil disturbance, damage to School Lake's vegetative buffer, and significant pollution to School Lake. In 2000, the Marx's contracted with Ron Bowen, former president of Prairie Restorations, and restored 7'Page approximately seven acres of prairie at a cost of $20,000 plus annual maintenance. There is also a 130-tree apple orchard the Marx's planted on the northern end of the property. In 2000, Mr. Marx put the entire 43 acre north parcel into the status of Agricultural Preserve. The initial mandatory term was eight years, and Mr. Marx renewed its status for an additional eight years after that expired in 2016. During that time Mr. Marx continued to improve the quality of the land by extensive cleaning up debris from the previous forty-five years of animal farming, quality planting and maintenance. The land produced forage and crops of apples. Land Cover & Wetlands The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) was developed in the late 1990s but was not released until approximately 2001. The City of Medina was one of the first areas mapped as part of the pilot program, with MLCCS field work conducted in 1999 and updated in 2008. This land cover mapping identified existing site features such as the maple -basswood forest dominating the western portion of the site, the tamarack and black ash swamp in the south, box elder -green ash forest, areas of seasonally and permanently flooded non-native dominated emergent vegetation, palustrine open water, and mesic prairie. This mapping is reflective of the site's current land cover classifications. In 2016, an approved wetland delineation of the entire site identified 9 wetlands totaling 41.58 acres. Of this wetland area, the tamarack swamp, the surrounding black ash and willow swamp, and the temporarily flooded emergent wetlands containing hybrid and narrow -leaf cattail and reed canary grass combine for 15.75 acres total. All of these wetlands are in the southern portion of the site. Another 14.13 acres of wetland are adjacent to School Lake. Several smaller wetlands were delineated in the eastern portion of the site, south of School Lake. The remaining acreage of the property includes 18.25 acres of steep slopes or non -buildable land and 29.09 acres of buildable land, 11.47 acres of which will be placed in conservation easement. In total, 71.3 acres of natural resource lands will be placed in conservation easement (79.4% of the entire property). CONSERVATION DESIGN OF MARX PROPERTY Development Layout The conservation design approach described in the Introduction was applied to the Marx site. The development team (including Mark Gronberg, Michael Pressman, Kent Williams, and Wally Marx) worked together to identify and respond to the site's unique attributes and sensitive natural features. Primary and secondary Conservation Areas were identified along with appropriate ecological buffers, and ecological corridors/connections. These Conservation Areas were avoided to the extent feasible when siting roads and residential lots, and they have been thoughtfully integrated into the development's design, establishing a connected network of predominantly native landscapes. Buffer averaging to allow minor impacts to buffers of low Wage quality, small wetlands were favored over disturbance to high quality oak stands, a forest condition that is not quickly or easily replicated. The Marx site design also followed the Better Site Design/Low Impact Development (LID) practices of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The Marx conservation development design incorporated all of the MPCA's "better site design techniques" listed below, except where noted: • Preserve natural areas • Natural area conservation • Site reforestation • Wetland and shoreline buffers • Open space design • Disconnect and distribute runoff • Soil compost amendments (these may be incorporated into final design of stormwater management elements) • Disconnect surface impervious cover • Grass channels • Stormwater landscaping • Narrower roadways where possible • Reduce impervious cover in site design • Narrower sidewalks (no sidewalks are proposed; all trails will be natural surface) Construction of the driveways and home areas of the proposed conservation development plan will remove 22 "significant trees" (as defined by the City of Medina's tree preservation ordinance)out of an estimated 4,136 "significant trees" on the property. Additional limited tree clearing is provided for below pursuant to Section XX infra, to allow views of the lake from the homes while keeping the shoreline integrity and providing visual screening of the homes from other parts of School Lake. The plan strives to preserve and buffer the existing maple - basswood forest at the west edge of the site. Development is clustered on the perimeter of the property away from the sensitive ecological features of the tamarack and black ash swamps. Grading and Ecological Stormwater Management Site grading and disturbance has been minimized to the extent feasible, retaining natural drainage patterns. The design team has capitalized on opportunities for ecological stormwater management in order to minimize runoff. Because of the siting of homes on Lots 1&2 on the plateau off of County Road 201, any impact of stormwater drainage from that which currently exists should be minimal. Also, with only 2.5 acres allotted to each of the building lots, and given their locations, any impact of stormwater drainage from that which currently exists should also be minimal. Necessary stormwater management will be addressed through stormwater ponds, rain gardens, and infiltration or filtration areas. 9'Page Cultural Amenities & Access A public access trail is proposed to be built, and an easement granted to the City for walking use only, with an entrance just north of the existing Marx driveway near the Old Growth Woods, heading east-northeast along the driveway and then northeast into Outlot C and heading on toward School Lake, circling in a loop, and then connecting back to the original trail. The public access trail shall be configured so that it does not interfere with the existing private horse trail. In addition, the City shall be granted a general east -west easement for a second public access trail linking trails to the east and west, with one possible route indicated on the final plat. An existing private horse trail, that extends through the property along the shoreline of School Lake and continues around the lake through neighboring properties, will be retained for private use with dedicated private easements for access and maintenance. The site has very little frontage on the adjacent scenic roadway to the west (Parkview Drive), and is not highly visible from adjacent properties. Planned lots have been positioned to provide screening between homes on the site and existing homes on Parkview Drive and on School Lake. The site does contain significant topographic changes, given the slopes above School Lake and on the western edge of the site. Siting and existing tree cover on the property will make structures, at most, only intermittently visible from the surroundings. OWNERSHIP, CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES & LAND PROTECTION Marx Property Land Allocation The Marx Property Final Plat addresses an 89.75-acre Conservation Design Subdivision. The proposed development plan calls for Development Areas including the private lots and roadways and Conservation Areas, as illustrated in Figure X below. 10'Page Figure 1. School Lake Preserve Land Allocation (acres to be updated in final draft) Conservation Area 71.3 acres Marx Property 89.75 acres Development Area 17.37 acres Development Area Wetlands 41.58 acres Uplands 11.76 acres Steep Slopes or Unbuildable 18.25 acres Private Lots XX acres Roads and ROW XX acres Park Dedication XX acres Areas not included in the Land Stewardship Plan The Marx Property's approximately 17.37 acres of Development Area includes roads, rights -of - way (ROW), park dedication, and private lots. Mr. Marx shall retain ownership of all private roads with necessary rights -of -way provided to the homeowners, the District, and the City, as appropriate. Private lots will be owned and maintained by Mr. Marx until the lots are purchased by homeowners. City Park Land Dedication The City will be granted easements to construct and maintain two pedestrian public trails within the Conservation Area and the corresponding acreage is included within the Conservation Area identified in Figure X. Conservation Area The City of Medina defines Conservation Area as: Designated land within a Conservation Design Subdivision that contributes towards achievement of one or more of the conservation objectives. A 11'Page Conservation Easement is placed on Conservation Areas to permanently restrict the Conservation Area from future development. Conservation Areas may be used for preservation of ecological resources, habitat corridors, passive recreation, and for pasture, hay cropping and other low impact agricultural uses. And, the City of Medina defines Conservation Easement as: As defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 84C: A nonpossessory interest of a holder in real property imposing limitations or affirmative obligations the purposes of which include retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space values of real property, assuring its availability for agricultural, forest, recreational, or open space use, protecting natural resources, maintaining or enhancing air or water quality, or preserving the historical, architectural, archaeological, or cultural aspects of real property. The approximately 71.3 acres of Conservation Area (CA) in the subdivision will be protected under a Conservation Easement that will be held by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), with individual lot owners retaining underlying fee ownership of specific outlots in the CA. This area is discussed below in terms of ownership, objectives, proposed restoration/enhancement, land protection methods, scheduling, funding, and enforcement. Ownership & Objectives The Conservation Areas will be transferred to future lot owners as individual outlots with conservation easements. The boundaries of these areas will be marked clearly in the field with permanent MCWD conservation easement signage. Adjoining easement outlots will be marked with permanent MCWD conservation easement signage along their shared boundaries. The overarching objective for the CA is to retain or improve the existing natural resource values and ecosystem functions of these areas. Land Protection Methods & Schedule The conservation easement ("Easement") protects the CA. The MCWD is the Easement holder. The MCWD, at its own cost, will inspect the CA at least annually for compliance. Fee owners will be responsible for the reasonable cost of additional MCWD inspection activity prompted by compliance issues. The Easement includes a Property Report, which documents CA conditions at the time of Easement recording. The MCWD will document conditions observed during annual inspections such as natural disturbance, spread of invasive species, and areas of erosion, and will detail both required and recommended corrections. The MCWD will provide inspection reports to the fee owners. 121Page Fee owner disturbance of the CA is as allowed by the Easement. A fee owner must restore any area of disturbance by decompacting and/or amending soils to restore prior soil structure and seeding with an appropriate seed mix (Attachment X) to reproduce preexisting cover type and density. A fee owner will maintain seeded area with mowing during the first growing season, early and late season mowing with targeted spot herbicide applications during the second growing season, and targeted spot herbicide applications during the third growing season. All fee owner actions under this paragraph are at the fee owner's cost. In addition to disturbance allowed under the Easement, in conjunction with initial house construction, the fee owners of Lots 1-4 may remove trees in accordance with a tree removal and site stabilization plan approved by the MCWD and the City. The purpose of tree removal is to provide for a reasonable lake view from the house and lake access, while preserving as much of the existing extent of naturalized shoreline view from the lake as possible. The fee owner will timely contact the MCWD during house design for an on -site meeting to develop this plan. The plan will conform to the constraints contained in the following table. The MCWD may prescribe such other reasonable conditions to protect slope and riparian edge stability, water quality buffering function and riparian habitat. Tree Type Allowable Actions Replacement Required Invasive Species (buckthorn, Japanese honeysuckle) Remove all anywhere on the property No, unless threat of erosion is present Trees under 8" DBH Remove up to 30% to provide lake view and access No, unless threat of erosion is present Trees over 8" DBH Remove up to 10% to provide lake view and access Yes, elsewhere in the shoreline area. Replacement trees to be of at least #10 pot size. After initial removal, non -lethal trimming of remaining trees and removal of new tree growth are permitted to maintain the established view and access. Docks and aquatic vegetation management will be allowed subject to City and State regulations and permitting requirements. Perpetual Management This section describes CA management by fee owners after initial construction and restoration. Perpetual management is essential to maintain the composition, structure, and function of healthy ecosystems throughout the CA. The guiding principle in response to alterations due to natural events is not to restore to the initial condition but to maintain the CA in a condition that preserves a healthy ecological condition consistent with the Conservation Values but reflecting natural adaptation. Perpetual management activities will include: 131Page " Areas of significant erosion causing or that may cause soil loss, vegetation loss, destabilized slopes, water quality issues, or soil movement will be stabilized. The following table identifies favored corrective approaches. Erosion Type Potential Corrections Sheet erosion on relatively flat area Erosion control blanket, seed, hydroseed, silt socks Rill erosion on flat or sloped area Bio-rolls or coir logs, check dams, planting by seed, hydroseed, potted plants, live stakes Slope erosion Erosion control blanket or coir blanket, planting by seed, plants, live stakes Shoreline erosion Bio-rolls or coir logs, planting by potted plants, live stakes " Blowdown or windthrow in woodland areas is to be evaluated based on the specific area, extent, and density of downed trees and the conservation values of the affected area. Retention of dead, dying, and downed trees and limbs provide important habitat features and coarse woody debris that is essential to the health of forest ecosystems. Allowing deadwood to accumulate with the forested areas supports floral and faunal habitat, water retention, and nutrient cycling. Downed trees will be removed if they pose a safety risk. Woodland areas will be inspected to determine need for removal for fire prevention and need for restoration. Selected removal of specific downed trees and limbs, while continuing to allow for deadwood accumulation, requires prior approval. " Areas with vegetation loss due to wildfire will be evaluated for regeneration potential and need for remediation. Woodland areas with dense shade and steep slopes will be re -seeded with appropriate seed mixes (see Attachment X) and protected with erosion control materials. " Restored prairie as delineated on Exhibit X: annual control of herbaceous invasive vegetation with spot mowing and spot herbicide treatments, prescribed burning, or haying. " Woodlands as delineated on Exhibit X: targeted management of woodland areas where invasive woody plants have been previously managed as of the date of the easement; control of woody invasive plants by cutting and herbicide treatments in these specific areas. " Woodlands and wetlands: remedial or enhancement seeding or planting in areas where invasive plants have previously been controlled as of the date of the easement as delineated on Exhibit X. Remedial or enhancement plantings along the School Lake shoreline where less desirable trees and shrubs are thinned. 141Page " Monitoring and reporting: landowner(s) or their ecologists and land management contractors to supply management activity reports to easement holder. By June 15 of each year, the MCWD will provide each fee owner with a report that, on the basis of MCWD inspection, describes annual fee owner management pursuant to this section. By July 30, fee owners, individually or collectively, will supply a proposed work scope for MCWD concurrence, which the MCWD will not unreasonably withhold. If work under an approved scope has not been completed by [insert date in advance of deadline for City certification of assessment to County], the MCWD may request that the City assess the scope cost [pro rata?] as provided in the Easement, may retain a contractor to perform the work at an appropriate time, and may receive the assessed funds from the City. If the fee owners have not established one or more approved scopes encompassing the entire CA, the MCWD may retain a contractor to perform a scope for the entire CA based on its report and may request that the City assess the reasonable cost of that scope. Land Protection Enforcement Because the CA will be protected by the Easement, the MCWD will monitor conformance to the Easement and inform the fee owner of all material violations and any required actions to resolve any material issues. If, after being so informed, the fee owner fails to conform to the Easement within a reasonable period of time, the City or the MCWD, independently or together, may serve written notice on the fee owner stating the alleged violation, the corrections required and a reasonable time within which the corrections shall be made. If the fee owner fails to comply within the time specified, or such other time as the MCWD, City and fee owner may agree, the City and/or the MCWD may enter the premises and take corrective action as needed to attain compliance. The reasonable costs of enforcement and corrective action by the City and the MCWD, including reasonable attorney costs, may be assessed against the residential property associated with the affected CA in accordance with the Easement. Any assessment (including any portion of an assessment) made hereunder may be challenged in a legal action, with the attorney's fees and costs of such challenge to be awarded to the prevailing party. CONCLUSION The proposed School Lake Nature Preserve complies with the City of Medina's Conservation Design District requirements and will serve as a model for future conservation developments in the City and region. The implementation and perpetual management of the project  as protected by the MCWD-held Conservation Easement  will result in a high quality development in which thoughtfully -planned home sites and enhanced ecological functions all work together and create a beautiful, livable place. 151Page Attachment X. Approved seed mixes for site restoration. Soil or cover type Seed Mix BWSR Designation Stormwater feature/infiltration Dry Swale / Pond 33-262 Wetland restoration post -herbicide Wetland Rehabilitation 34-171 Herbaceous wetland w/ intact native vegetation Emergent Wetland 34-181 Wetland with tree and shrub cover Riparian South & West 34-261 Wet prairie Wet Prairie 34-262 Upland prairie Dry Prairie 35-221 or 35-621 Mesic prairie Mesic Prairie General 35-241 Woodland edge Woodland Edge South & West 36-211 1'Page 16276 MARX/NORTH DETAIL PLAN 11-]-16 S 89°09'10" $ 417.4 SCOT T K 0 2822 N'793'10"W 417.40/ 44+- /\ TH 4 AgIDEN EXISTING DRIV TO 20 FT WIDE BITUM OUS OUTLOT K PROPOSED AST -WEST TRAIL EASEMENT RFUTURE USE CHARL ES AND PAMEL A SCHROEDER #2910 I PRELIMINARY PLAT S 89°16'25" E 2681.97 ICJ-T-LO-T F 4.80+- T E OW 3Y OT 3) WETLAND F MANAGE 2 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN=999 5 6:28+- AC. PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMEN�ET=AND C SOUTH LINE OF NORTH 845 FT. OF S 1/2, NW 1/4 SEC. 16-11:- E TRUCK TUR A U r_. 0 ET�ND MANAGE2 _FLOODP C 21.95+- AC. WETLAND D PRESERVE OUT • 3.19+- A WETLAND A PRESERVE BUFFER vz EprETD i 1000 / PRO P<' • EAST -WEST TRAIL MENT FOR FUTURE USE 520+- N 89°09'10" W 520.01 SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE BUFFER S 89°03'53" E 2159.45 x r � I s 7 BC 1 S 00°26'42" W 485.47 POSSIBLE HOUSE SITE POSSIBLE SEPTIC SITE SLOPE>18% BUILDABLE AREA WITHIN LOTS BUILDABLE AREA IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT ADDITIONAL CONSERVATION AREAS SCHOOL LAKE BELOW 998 O H W WETLAND E AND ADDITIONAL BUFFERS cn zY occ u-)a >2 ww ECcc 4 C) W a CC W Z Z J a z ♦J� v/ cc O W OC 0 Z a J fA cc W W Z C5 Z W J_ U 11.0 ILO ILO FAX: 952-473-4435 PHONE: 952-473-4141 Op N 6 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT zw Ow ci)z >3 wz ow D J �Q F-z U- - W C0 u_ G CC D_ w 0 oW zz cc 0 �w O� w� J } m 0 oQ wg ¢¢ wQ cc_ �o LL O w F- F- w LL O U7 Q J w CC w 0 z CC O i W CC ai Q 0 ~O z� Qw 0 z ¢— MINN. LICENSE NUMBER 0 0 z C1 0 cn z 0 w ec r� z 0 w cc z 0 W N T CD N co T CV T O T O T N O T (D T T O T T N T O T N T T Lf) T 1 Ln T Lf) T M 00 16-278 SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE TITLE SHEET VICIMrY MAP P 1 TITLE SHEET P 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS P 3 SOILS OVERLAY P 4 PRELIMINARY PLAT P 5 PRELIMINARY ROAD PLAN P 6 SIMPLIFIED MAP SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IN THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 16-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Vr',ZO�NG l SFf. OF81R,t#r WltC 1F11&R3 i3-27S EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: PARCEL 16-118-23-23-0005 That part of the South half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 16, township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying south of the north 845 feet thereof, EXCEPT that West 417,42 feet of the North 208.71 feet of the South 213,71 feet of said South half of the Northwest Quarter; ALSO That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 16 lying North of the South 500 feet thereof and West of the East 520 feet thereof; PARCEL 16-118-23-32-0002 The Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, EXCEPT that part thereof platted as PRISCILLAADDITION; The South 500 feet of that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian tying West of the East 520 feet of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. '09'10' W 417.40 r� I 1.74+. AC SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE SOILS OVERLAY IN THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 16-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LINE OF 2, NW 114 L36A 2.p4+, AC PID#1611823320002- 8'.16'25" E 2681.97 L41E �''�\ PI■' 61 823310002; ' ... L16A 111(41%7:6.1AC 138A 6.74+- AC ' 369'03'63'- L41E 311- J1.+ N 86'5814" W N 89°03'53' W 819.72 N 8 co N 89°09'10" W 520.01 S 00°26'42" W 485.47 0 200 400 800 SCALE IN FEET zzLo, _ z vi g Z W Z W HgY� a�gx o,sOLL y�o co o>� otf 5 o M tN�g3Y 1.6 N W Wzd°f m ("3 z w z 0 O 5u'a CZ ' V c6acv'cv K fag �owiF �..-ALL...� 16-276 3 1030 1020 1010 1000 990 980 l6-2T0 "20,0-14, w _ SCALE IN FEET Hato wtOALE - SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE PRELIMINARY ROAD PLAN 7 7 EXISTING 15 INCH CMP WIDEN EXISTING DRIVE 4 FT, ON NORTH SIDE FROM 54SO TO END PROPOSED ROAD AD i IRCh TYPE 2550 OITWNN44S'SASE %JOHAN° 1 attCkt 312G7SH C SS11 V.5xR OATS 0..Ta EPfSA 17 FFe cusssmiapam nEEOT£7Gi1lGRAt1pIC 'ffN7Oao�Eerx�oaqucxrenueo�fETt+not;awA1tus1naSAME gficnoN 1010 1000 990 980 ��s W N Z2M wou Z a5Y v�g ° �>Oo 7 ao> 5 WZo ZZ3 0 -1 J 3 w FAX: 952-473-4435 PHONE: 952-473-4141 0 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS. INC: 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: MEETING DATE: RE: CITY FILE: Application Date: Review Deadline: Medina City Council Nate Sparks September 13, 2017 September 19, 2017 Medina Senior Living Community Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Review LR-17-204 June 19, 2017 October 17, 2017 BACKGROUND At the August 15, 2017 City Council meeting, the Council reviewed a rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan from Lunski, Inc. for the Medina Senior Living Community project. Concerns were expressed regarding wetland impacts to allow for the construction of the building. Some Council members also questioned whether the proposed rezoning is appropriate at this time, prior to the Comprehensive Plan update being in effect. The Council requested that the applicant revise the plan to reduce the impacts to the wetlands and, on a 3-2 vote, directed Staff to bring back resolutions and an ordinance related to the approvals for the project. PLAN REVISIONS Wetlands The applicant has revised the building location to reduce the wetland impacts. Wetland impacts are still proposed for access to the site, which do not appear to be avoidable in order to access the southern portion of the site. The minimum wetland buffers and setbacks to wetland buffers are being provided, as required by Code. The Watershed District has generally found this amendment to be acceptable. Building Plans The building has been slightly modified from the previous plan. The angle of the northwest corner of the building has been changed to be parallel to the wetland boundary. In order to accommodate this, seven parking stalls have been eliminated from the plan. The number of units in the facility has been reduced from 90 to 83. (The site plan and narrative refers to 80 units but the building plan depicts 83.) 15 of the units remain as special/memory care. The number of studio units was reduced from 29 to 20 and one two -bedroom unit was removed. Replacing some of these units were additional one bedroom units with dens. The office/medical building has not been changed. The skyway has been modified to meet the Planning Commission recommendation that it be constructed of materials that match the buildings. Parking As mentioned above, the amount of parking has been reduced. The parking on the previous plan was 216 stalls and now proposed is 210 (including proof of parking). The applicant is proposing a 19 stall "proof of parking" area to be added later, if needed, which was recommended by the Planning Commission. The amount of handicapped parking appears to be adequate. The number of stalls required for the medical/office building is based on 1 stall per 250 square feet. This results in a parking requirement of 100 stalls. The applicant is providing 33 stalls on the lowest level of the building and the remainder in the parking lots to satisfy the requirement. The City requires 2.25 spaces per apartment unit. This standard may apply to the senior independent living. This is assumed to be 41 units, which would require 93 parking stalls. The Institute of Transportation Engineers Standards Manual recommends 0.4 stalls per unit for senior assisted living and 0.35 stalls per unit for memory/special care units. This would result in a parking requirement of 17 stalls for the assisted living and special care units, for a total parking requirement of 110 stalls. Forty-eight stalls are being provided in the lowest level of the senior housing building. This calculation would suggest that 210 stalls are necessary for the two uses. As stated, the plan depicts 210 stalls. It should be noted that the independent living portion of the senior building is being calculated as the same as regular apartments, as that is how the use is treated in the Zoning Ordinance. Parking studies suggest that senior apartments do have a lesser demand for parking than regular apartments, sometimes resulting in the need for 0.5 fewer stalls per unit. Based on this, it would seem that the proof of parking area would be acceptable subject to terms and conditions requiring the provision of the parking as the City's request. The remaining independent living units could defer to the City's multi -family parking standard for 2.25 stalls per unit. This would result in a parking requirement of 120 stalls. Based upon this information, it is reasonable to determine that the proposed parking should be adequate for the mix of uses proposes. It is very important that a strong agreement is in place to provide the assisted/independent living facility with access to the parking on the medical office lot. Tree Replacement The applicant has reduced the number of trees provided in the landscaping plan, which increases the amount of replacement trees required. Allowed deductions for initial and site development result in a required replacement of 320.5 inches of trees for the development on Lots 2 and 3. The minimum landscaping requirements for Lots 2 and 3 are 36 overstory trees, 18 ornamental trees, and 59 shrubs. The plan shows 66 overstory trees, 28 ornamental trees, and 128 shrubs. This would allow for 30 overstory trees (90 inches) to be counted towards replacement. Also, the trees provided are one half inch larger than required, which would allow for 18 additional inches. In total, this now results in 108 replacement inches within the landscaping plan reducing the required replacement to 212.5 inches. In similar cases in the past, the City has accepted off -site planting as an alternative, or a cash contribution towards future off -site planting. The City has accepted $100 per inch of replacement previously. Replacement trees placed on Lot 1 will need to be accounted for on any future site development. Other Components The other components of the plan were unchanged from the last review and are still viewed to be generally acceptable. Engineering comments have been provided. Some more minor modifications are still being required. REZONING As stated during the previous review, the applicant proposes to rezone the property to B, Business District, which would be consistent with the direction the City is heading in the draft 2020 - 2040 Comprehensive Plan. "Nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and independent living facilities associated with such uses" are a permitted use within this District. In the 2010 - 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which is still in effect until the 2020 - 2040 Plan is adopted, this site is guided for a Commercial land use which contemplates "commercial, office, and retail uses" that are "concentrated along the TH 55 corridor." The Business zoning district was designed more to implement the Business land use in the 2010 - 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Commercial -Highway district was designed for the Commercial land use. However, because the City has contemplated changing the land use of the subject site to Business in the draft 2020 - 2040 Plan, any rezoning would ideally be generally consistent with the 2010 - 2030 Comprehensive Plan and not in conflict with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Commercial and Business land uses share a similar set of objectives within the 2010-2030 Comp Plan, rather than each having a unique list. As such, it could be argued that the rezoning to Business is not inconsistent with the 2010 - 2030 Commercial land use, especially within the context of the proposed change to Business in the draft 2020 - 2040 Plan update. Findings related to the proposed rezoning are provided in the ordinance for consideration. REQUEST REVIEW Rezoning The applicant is proposing a rezoning to B, Business which will correspond with the 2010 - 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The 2010 - 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which is still in effect, identifies this parcel as Commercial. The General Business designation more directly corresponded with the Business District. The Comprehensive Plan discusses the two designations as follows: Commercial (C) provides areas for highway oriented businesses and retail establishments; can include commercial, office and retail uses; is concentrated along the TH 55 corridor and are served or will be served by urban services. General Business (GB) provides opportunities for corporate campus uses including light industrial and retail uses. This designation identifies larger tracts of land that are suitable for office and business park developments and are served or will be served by urban services. The purpose of the Business District is: "The purpose of the Business (B) district is to provide for a zoning district for a mix of office, high quality light industrial, and larger -scale retail and service uses with proximity to arterial roadways. Development shall include high quality and attractive building materials and architectural design as well as extensive landscaping in order to limit impacts on surrounding land uses, and shall be integrated and coordinated in a way to most efficiently utilize site improvements and to protect the natural environment." The rezoning will need to be found to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Preliminary Plat In the Subdivision Ordinance it is stated that the City shall deny approval of a preliminary plat if one or a combination of the following finding are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. Site Plan Review The site plan review is intended to confirm "whether it is consistent with the requirements of this ordinance, including the applicable development standards and the purpose of the zoning district in which the property is located." STAFF RECOMMENDATION The applicant has made adjustments to the plan to reduce the overall number of units in the building and lessen wetland impacts. These changes directly address many of the concerns expressed by City Staff and greatly improve the plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission found the project to be generally acceptable provided the applicant can meet the following conditions of approval: 1. A mechanism shall be provided to ensure the senior building meets zoning requirements, including limitations on independent living units and required parking provisions. 2. The entire private road shall be within the Outlot. 3. The applicant shall meet tree replacement requirements 4. The wetland impacts shall be subject to WCA review and approval. 5. The applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver regarding future turn lane construction. 6. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City related to its contribution to the future extension of Chippewa Road. 7. Association documents shall be provided in the manner requested by the City Attorney and shall specifically address the parking being provided on the office property for the benefit of the senior housing building. 8. Park dedication shall be paid as recommended by the Parks Commission. 9. All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed District shall be addressed. 10. All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed. 11. The preliminary plat shall provide sufficient right-of-way for Chippewa Road and appropriate drainage and utility easements. 12. The applicant shall meet the requirements of the City Attorney with regards to title documentation. 13. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement to the City in a form and of substance acceptabled to the City Attorney to ensure compliance with the conditions of approval and relevant City requirements and policies. 14. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. 15. The final plat applicant shall be filed within 180 days of the date of the city council resolution granting preliminary approval or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 16. The site plan review approval shall be effective for one year. 17. The applciant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, site plan review, and related documents POTENTIAL ACTION As noted above, the application includes three land use requests. The first request which staff recommends be considered is the rezoning to the Business zoning district. A draft ordinance which would rezone the property is attached for reference. If the City Council believes the rezoning is appropriate within the context of the current Commercial land use on the property as well as the proposed Business land use in the DRAFT 2020-2040 comprehensive plan, it would be appropriate to adopt the ordinance. Move to adopt the ordinance to rezone the subject property to the Business zoning district. Move to adopt the resolution authorizing publication of the ordinance by title and summary. The second request for consideration would be the preliminary plat. If the Council does not make any of the findings above related to the subdivision ordinance, the following motion would be in order: Move to approve the resolution granting preliminary plat approval subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. If the Council finds that the site plan for the senior housing and office building meet relevant ordinance requirements, the following motion would be in order. Approval of this resolution would be contingent upon approval of the rezoning and plat above. Move to approve the resolution granting site plan review approval, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. Attached: Rezoning Ordinance Resolution authorizing publication of the ordinance by title and summary Resolution granting preliminary plat approval Resolution granting site plan review approval Engineer's Comments received 9/13/2017 Elm Creek Watershed District Comments received 9/6/2017 Applicant's Narrative Preliminary Plat Plan Set dated 8/28/2017 CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE THE PROPERTY BEING PLATTED AS LUNSKI-NELSON ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Lunski, Inc. has requested that the City rezone PID #03-118-23-32-0007 (the "Property") which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, from RCH, Rural Commercial Holding to B, Business. Section 2. The City Council has made the following findings of fact with regards to the proposed rezoning: 1. The Property is guided for Commercial development within the Comprehensive Plan. The Commercial land use is intended for highway oriented businesses including commercial, office and retail uses. .ij000m,. 2. The Property is proposed to be guided for Business development within the draft Comprehensive Plan update which is currently under review. The Business land use is intended for corporate campus uses including offices, office parks, warehousing, and other such uses. 3. The purpose of the B zoning district is to provide for a mix of office, commercial, and larger scale retail and service uses. These uses are consistent with the uses described within the definition of the Commercial land use within the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The purpose of the B zoning district is to apply to property which is proximate to arterial roadways. This is consistent with the definition of the Commercial land use, which states that the use will be concentrated along the Highway 55 corridor and to include highway oriented businesses. 5. The Property is adjacent to Highway 55, an arterial roadway. 6. The Commercial and Business land uses share a common set of objectives within the Comprehensive Plan. The standards and uses permitted within the B zoning district are consistent with these objectives and do not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The proposed rezoning to the B zoning district is also consistent with the objectives within the pending draft Comprehensive Plan designation as Business and is not in conflict with either the existing Comprehensive Plan or the pending update to the Plan. Section 2. The official zoning map of the City of Medina is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the Property from RCH, Rural Commercial Holding to B, Business. The amendment to the zoning map is displayed on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B. Section 3. A copy of this Ordinance and the updated map shall be kept on file at the Medina City Hall. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication and final approval of the plat which is proposed to subdivide the Property. Section 5. The City of Medina Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make the appropriate changes to the official zoning map of the City of Medina to reflect the change in zoning classifications as set forth above upon final approval of the plat. Adopted by the Medina City Council this day of 2017. CITY OF MEDINA By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: By: Scott Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk Published in the South Crow River News on this day of , 2017 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property That part of the West 918.12 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying Northerly of Highway 55, except the West 75 feet thereof and except road. EXHIBIT B Map Displaying Rezoning Location of Property rezoned to B-Business Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance amending the official zoning map to rezone the property being subdivided and developed as the Medina Senior Living Community; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is four pages in length and contains a map; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety: Public Notice The city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance amending the official zoning map to rezone the property being subdivided and developed as the Medina Senior Living Community The ordinance rezones PID #03-118-23-32-0007 to the Business zoning district. The subject property is located north of Highway 55, west of Mohawk Drive, and south of Chippewa Road. The full text of Ordinance No. ### is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city. Resolution No. 2017-## September 19, 2017 Dated: September 19, 2017. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017-## 2 September 19, 2017 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 2017- RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR THE PLAT OF "LUNSKI-NELSON ADDITION" WHEREAS, the City of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Lunski, Inc. (the "Applicant") has made an application for a subdivision of land (the "Property") legally described as: That part of the west 918.12 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying northerly of Highway 55, except the west 74 feet thereof. and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 11 acres in size; and WHEREAS, the Applicant is proposing to develop the Property into three B, Business District parcels; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on July 11, 2017 and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council on August 8, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed preliminary plat at the August 15, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings of fact regarding the preliminary plat based on the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, subject to compliance with the terms and conditions noted herein: a. The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not premature for consideration. b. The subdivision is appropriate for the physical conditions on the site including the topography, storm water, natural resources, and soils. c. The development proposed is generally consistent with the standards of the B, Business District. d. The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage. e. The proposed subdivision is not likely to be injurious to public health. f. The proposed subdivision and its improvements will not conflict with public or private streets, easements, or rights -of -way. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants preliminary approval of the plat of Lunski-Nelson Addition subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. This approval shall be contingent upon approval by the City of the proposed rezoning of the Property to the Business zoning district. 2. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy. 3. The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated August 28, 2017, except as may be modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. 4. The Applicant shall construct and maintain the trails as shown on the plans. Credit towards required park dedication fees shall be granted for the trails, so long as access to the private trail system is provided for the general public. In addition to providing access to the trail system for the general public, a park dedication fee shall be paid in the amount of $106,110.00 in -lieu of dedicating land. If public access is terminated to the private trail system, the park dedication fee shall increase to $204,558.00. 5. The Applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver agreement regarding future turn lane construction to serve the proposed access for the Property. 6. The Applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver agreement with the City related to its contribution to the future extension of Chippewa Road. 7. The Applicant shall comply with the City's wetland protection ordinance, including easement requirements, upland buffer planting, and signage requirements. 8. The Applicant shall comply by the conditions of the Wetland Replacement Plan and impacts shall be subject to WCA permitting requirements. 9. All comments from the City Engineer dated 9/13/2017 shall be addressed. 10. The plat shall be updated to provide 50 feet of right-of-way from the center line of Chippewa Road to accommodate future turn/bypass lanes to serve the Property, as well as appropriate drainage and utility easements. These easements shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 11. The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. 12. All comments of the City Attorney shall be addressed, and the Applicant shall abide by the City Attorney's recommendations related to title issues and recording procedures. 13. The Applicant shall obtain necessary approvals and permits from the Elm Creek Watershed, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Metropolitan Council, and other relevant agencies. 14. The final plat applicant shall be filed within 180 days of the date of the city council resolution granting preliminary approval or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 15. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Dated September 19, 2017. Attest: By: Jodi Gallup, City Clerk By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member !introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 2017- RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE MEDINA SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY & MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Lunski, Inc. (the "Applicant") has made an application for a zoning map amendment in conjunction with a proposed preliminary plat to be known as Lunski-Nelson Addition; and WHEREAS, the Applicant received approval of a preliminary plat known as the Lunski- Nelson Addition in Resolution No. ; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made an application for a site plan review for construction of an assisted living facility with associated independent senior living units on Lot 2, Block 1 and a medical/office building on Lot 3, Block 1 of the proposed plat; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the site plan at the July 11, 2017 and August 8, 2017 meetings and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the application at the August 15, 2017 meeting and reviewed the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed site and building plans are generally consistent with the requirements and intent of the B, Business District, subject to certain terms and conditions which are noted herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby approves the proposed Site Plan with the following conditions: 1. Approval of this Site Plan Review shall be contingent upon approval of a rezoning of the subject property to the Business zoning district. 2. A mechanism shall be provided to ensure the senior building meets zoning requirements, including limitations on the percentage of independent living units and the provision of adequate parking on Lot 2 and Lot 3. 3. The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated August 28, 2017, except as may be modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. 4. The required tree replacement per the City's tree preservation ordinance is 320.5 inches for the development on Lots 2 and 3. The Applicant's plan proposes 108 inches of replacement trees. The plan shall be revised to include the remaining 212.5 inches of replacement trees. As an alternative, the Applicant may also provide off -site replacement or a contribution of $100 per caliper inch for off -site replacement ($212,500). 5. Replacement trees placed on Lot 1 shall be protected or replaced through any future development activity. 6. The Applicant shall comply with all the terms of the WCA replacement plan and the City's wetland protection ordinance including the placement of buffers within easements, providing an upland buffer planting plan, and the provision of wetland buffer signage. 7. Association documents shall be provided in the manner requested by the City Attorney and shall specifically address the parking being provided on the office property for the benefit of the senior housing building. 8. All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed District shall be addressed. 9. All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed. 10. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement to the City in a form and of substance acceptabled to the City Attorney to ensure compliance with the conditions of approval and relevant City requirements and policies. 11. The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. 12. The site plan review approval shall be effective for one year and thereafter shall be considered null and void. 13. Construction on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Lunski-Nelson Addition preliminary plat shall require separate site plan review consideration. No approvals are granted herein for any development on Lot 1. 14. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, site plan review, and related documents. Dated September 19, 2017. Attest: By: Jody Gallup, City Clerk By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member land upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. YY SB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 I Minneapolis, MN 55416 I (763) 541-480011 September 13, 2017 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Medina Senior Living — Engineering Review City Project No. LR-17-204 WSB Project No. 03433-140 Dear Mr. Finke: We have reviewed The Medina Senior Living application and plans dated August 28, 2017. The applicant proposes to construct a 90-unit senior living complex consisting of three stories and approximately 118,100 square feet. In addition, a separate 40,000 square foot two-story medical/office building is also proposed for the site. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Site and Grading Plans 1. The utilities shown on the site plan and make it difficult to read, either eliminate these on the site plan or make the line -types lighter. Complete. 2. The City's comprehensive trail plan shows a future trail extension along Chippewa Road. The applicant may need to provide additional right of way, easements, and/or construct a trail along this section of Chippewa Road as a part of the park dedication allocation to the City. Pending direction from City Staff. 3. Provide an exhibit showing the turning movements of trucks (fire and delivery) within the site inclu(-ances along with a detail of the truck dimensions. Complete, shown on architectural site plan. 4. COrrLA,i 6y1111JUl fur Lui; y ul osed tree locations on the landscaping sheets; it is also not clear what types of trees are being planted in relation to the legend. Complete. 5. In general, plans shall meet the requirements set forth in the City's Design Manual. Complete. The applicant stated they will take this under advisement. 6. Maximize the parking lot bump out at the southeasterly lot to allow for greater turning movement space during backup maneuvering. Complete. 7. The retaining walls are difficult to see on the site plan where adjacent to bituminous trail. Differentiate color or linetype. Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer l wsbeng.como Medina Senior Living — Engineering Review September 13, 2017 Page 2 8. With construction plans please provide the following: o Details and design information for the proposed boardwalk. o There are walls proposed greater than 3', add the appropriate details. Note all of the locations and provide more elevation information at each corner, end, or curve point. Place notes so that they are legible and not covered by contours or other linework. Where the retaining walls are 3' or taller, a safety rail will be required. o Note that slopes shall not exceed 3:1 in locations where the steep slopes are proposed. o Provide analysis to confirm that the proposed underground parking is feasible given the underlying soil conditions and water table elevation. o Correct the bituminous non -wearing course mixture design designations. o The sanitary sewer manholes will also require a 6" mastic wrap (Gator Wrap) on the exterior at each barrel joint. Please note on pertinent details or notes on plan. o The typical section for the pervious pavement does not designate the required thickness of the "filtration bed course". Either note on site plan or in typical section. The hatching is still very similar to that of concrete sidewalk, please correct. o Show light duty pavement section in legend. o Show locations of ribbon curb, surmountable, and frill back barrier curb on site plan. Indicate curve radii as well. o Add directional arrows with percent of grade along curb lines on grading plan. Street grade near/under proposed skyway appears to be steep, confirm correct grading in that location. Utility Plan 9. Easements may be required by the City to encompass all or a portion of the sanitary sewer and watermain into the site. Easements need to be updated to encompass water/sewer along the southwesterly portion of the lot. Appears to be complete, but preliminary plat is difficult to read with all of the site improvements included; will confirm with final plat submittal. 10. Looping connections may be required to minimize long dead-end watermain sections, the latest layout provided will require review by the City's Fire Marshall. Extend the watermain south with the sanitary sewer alignment along the westerly property line and provide a • _., T 55. Complete. City public works staff have noted that a second connection to the existing 16-inch main is not preferred. 11. and sanitary sewer stubs up to the right of way line adjacent to Chippewa Road - sr and watermain were extended, but add a gate valve to the watermain stub. Complete. 12. Label the building Sci ices separately and include type of pipe and stub invert information for the sanitary services. Add missing invert information to sewer stub proposed for the future lot. Complete. 13. With construction plans please provide the following: o Provide dimension labels between watermain and both sanitary sewer and storm sewer piping. Where watermain crosses any storm or sanitary sewer, add note "Maintain 18-inch Separation, 4" Rigid Insulation". Medina Senior Living — Engineering Review September 13, 2017 Page 3 o Add dimension labels between watermain and sewer piping. o Use different line -type for sanitary sewer that includes arrows to denote direction of flow. o On Sheet C5.0 under Sanitary Sewer Notes, note 1 needs to be corrected to meet the requirements of the City of Medina design guidelines in regards to pipe strength designation and bury depth. Need to add that PVC DR 18 is required for pipe depths greater than 26'. o Turn off pavement striping and hatching on utility plan. It is difficult to differentiate piping with striping in some cases. o Hydrants should be located 5' behind the back of curb. It appears that some are not meeting this requirement. o Add valve symbols to locations where valves are noted on the plan in all instances. o Based on the current design, it appears the applicant will be required to apply for permits from DLI and MDH, provide copies to the City. Traffic & Intersections 14. The findings of the traffic study have been reviewed by the City Engineering staff and are generally acceptable. 15. Although the Traffic Study indicates that no turn lanes are required at the site entrance based on the analysis of the traffic generated by the new development, turn lanes may be required in the future due to increased traffic along Chippewa Road. The study recommends that right-of-way is reserved for future turn lanes; the City will require that right-of-way is dedicated for this purpose. The City may also request a petition and waiver for the construction of future turn lanes. 16. The study recommends that the adjacent property's driveway is consolidated with the proposed entrance drive now or with future development within the adjacent property. The applicant should consider this in the design of the access and provide options for combining the driveways in the future. Stormwater Management & Erosion Control 17. The development will need to meet the City's infiltration requirement. It is not clear in the submittal how this will be accomplished. One option is to utilize stormwater reuse from the proposed ponds for irrigation. The ponds are not allowed to be drained completely because of "aesthetic purposes". A minimum of 2 feet of water must be kept in the ponds at all times. Volume credit for reuse should be calculated using the RWMWD Stormwater Reuse Calculator. This method has been accepted by the City for previous developments. Please lit these calculations showing that the volume abstraction requirement has been met. Complete. 18. several ponds are shown on the grading plans. The City requires compliance with the volume control requirement and it is not clear that any infiltration or filtration volume is provided. See previous comment above. Complete. 19. The development will need to meet the appropriate Elm Creek Watershed standards and permitting requirements, provide permitting documents to the City when approved. Medina Senior Living — Engineering Review September 13, 2017 Page 4 20. Provide demonstration that the water quality criteria have been met using PondNet, P8, or other approved water quality modeling method. Once the volume abstraction requirement has been met, then the water quality requirement has been met. Please address. Complete. 21. Specify if future impervious area at the north side of the site has been included for treatment or if this area is to be treated once constructed. Complete. Future impervious is not included. 22. EOFs are labeled on the plans, but grading does not indicate adequate conveyance in those locations. Adjust contours/grading at these locations to properly control overflow conveyance. 23. Label the size and type of existing and proposed storm sewer piping, label the invert information on all catch basins/manholes. Complete. 24. Calculations must be submitted indicating the culvert under the proposed entrance road is sized adequately to convey the offsite tributary area to the wetland. Complete. 25. North Pond must have a minimum dead pool depth of 3 feet. Complete. 26. North Pond NWL does not match that used in HydroCAD. Confirm the correct NWL and HWL. Currently, the NWL in HydroCAD for the North Pond is set at 991, but the plans show 992, please correct. Complete. 27. Show HWL on the plans for the biofiltration basin. Complete. 28. Confirm that the freeboard from the lowest opening of the buildings meets the two feet of freeboard from the emergency overflow elevations of the BMPs. The two -foot free -board requirement has not been met; either the freeboard requirement is met or the applicant must demonstrate that the 100-year back to back storm does not affect the adjacent buildings. Not complete. Complete. 29. The proposed bump -out for fire truck turning encroaches into the pond. Update the pond contours and stonnwater modelling to address change in pond sizing. Complete. 30. With construction plans please provide the following: o Add a legend to the Erosion Control Sheet for the BMP's and their symbols. Consider turning off utilities, parking lot striping, and other not critical erosion/sediment control related linework on this sheet. Add directional arrows. o Show grading/construction limits on erosion/sediment control plan. o Consider use of larger diameter perforated pipe instead of separate PVC mainline and draintile for pervious paving areas. o Add specific details for each control structure proposed. Wetland Impacts 31. Provide plan updates as a result of the TEP meeting on August 22, 2017. The updated plans address the TEP comments. Complete. Temporary Stockpile Plan A revised plan was not received and these comments have not been addressed. 32. All silt fence should be heavy duty. Two -rows of silt fence will be required adjacent to the wetland areas. Medina Senior Living — Engineering Review September 13, 2017 Page 5 33. Provide written permission from property owner concerning right of entry. 34. Based on the proposed "10' maximum height" and the City's understanding that 32,000 cubic yards are intended to be stockpiled and considering sloped sides, a larger footprint or higher stockpile height may be necessary. 35. Add a note that the existing driveway is a right -in, right -out condition. 36. An NPDES permit will be required for an area of disturbance or size of stockpile over one acre. 37. Add a note to the plans to "protect existing culvert" as it appears the entrance to the stockpile site will be directly over this pipe. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the plans. The owner/developer is fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City's standards. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer ��p��INS14�� * .<' Tr LUNSKI INC. ALJ �� ,vs - M-t4 " August 4, 2017 Dusty Finke City Planner, City of Medina Department of Planning and Zoning 2052 County Road 24 Medina, Minnesota 55340 Mr. Finke, Please find enclosed the summary for the proposed development located between Highway 55 and Chippewa Road (PID #0311823320007). The proposed project consists of two components: a 3 story Assisted / Independent Senior Living Community and a two story medical/office building. Project Description: We are proposing a 90 unit assisted / independent senior living community consisting of three stories and approximately 118,100 square feet. The design of the senior community will accommodate a minimum of 50% assisted living units and likely more depending upon leasing demand. Amenities will include on -site dining, a bistro cafe / coffee shop, beauty salon, exercise / wellness room, and various group gathering areas accommodating a wide variety of activities. Extensive outdoor spaces including porches, patios and trails across the site provide additional opportunities for residents to engage the natural setting. In addition to the residential building, a two story, 40,000 s.f. (approximate) medical / office building is proposed adjacent to Highway 55 along the southern portion of the site. The intended use will provide a synergistic relationship with the senior facility and augment the services available to residents on site in addition to providing a valuable medical resource within the area. A proposed skyway connection between the two buildings will further allow residents and staff to work in tandem across the two facilities. An underground parking garage as well as surface parking is provided for this facility. After receiving comments through the city's Concept Submittal review of the project, and per discussion with City staff, we have made a number of revisions to the overall project. These revisions are the result of both internal review as well as our best attempt to comply with the City of Medina's zoning ordinances. These revisions include: �% Overall reduction of units within the senior living facility from 135 to 90. �% Reduction in the medical / office building area by approximately 6,000 s.f. �% Eliminated 1 story commercial building within the southwest corner of the site resulting in a need for 17 fewer parking stalls. �% All buildings within the development conform to setback regulations per B zoning requirements. �% Lot lines are revised to reflect the footprint of the access drive within lot 1 as well as the parking layout between lots 3 and 4. �% Parking calculations are revised to better reflect the City's ordinances however the ordinances do not specifically address a service based senior living facility as a type of use. �% A walking path has been extended to Chippewa Road per staff comments. �% The current site plan complies with B zoning district landscape requirements including: 12' buffer between all buildings and access drives, 8% of parking and drive areas are landscaped, and landscaping breaks within the parking lot are minimum 12' wide. �% Fire truck turn -around has been included behind the Medical / office building. �% Wetland impact has been minimized in the vicinity of the private access drive. As a part of this process, the gazebo was eliminated and the walking trail has been revised. �% The wetland buffer has been revised to comply with average setbacks required by both the City of Medina as well as the Elm Creek Watershed. In addition, revisions were made to ensure building overhangs and balconies comply with the setback requirements. �% Signage has been relocated to comply with setback and clear vision triangles at intersections. The existing site: The 10.8 acre site is zoned Rural Commercial Holding (RCH). A large portion of the site consists of a Manage 1 Wetland. The wetland area including buffer and required building setbacks total slightly more than 40% of the overall site area. There have been a variety of concept plans prepared consisting of a variety of proposed uses for the site. All of the other concept plans required significantly more wetland impacts in order to develop a feasible concept plan. Since the existing wetland bisects the property and there are site access controls along Highway 55, it is impossible to avoid all wetland impacts while utilizing available developable land. This proposed design minimizes the amount of proposed wetland impact to the greatest amount possible. It is anticipated that wetland replacement will be achieved by purchasing available off -site wetland banking credits. There are almost 2,000 caliper -inches of significant trees located on the property. The proposed design preserves 70% of the existing significant trees. It is proposed that a portion of the replacement trees will be provided on -site, with the balance being provided as payment to the City.. The proposed buildings: The Senior Living Facility building is a 3 story, 90 unit assisted living / independent senior community with one level of parking partially below grade. The total gross area of this building, excluding garage, will be approximately 99,800 square feet. The garage will be approximately 18,500 square feet and will contain 48 parking stalls. The medical / office building will be two stories and contain approximately 24,800 square feet of commercial space. In addition, a lower level will accommodate 33 garage stalls as well as service space. The intended use would provide a regional clinic with the potential for specialty care such as chiropractic, orthopedic, or rehabilitation / physical therapy services. A skyway connection between buildings on site allows direct access for the residents of the senior facility to take direct advantage of these additional services available. 2 Proposed architectural details of the new buildings: The buildings will comply with the City of Medina's performance standards for exterior materials per Section 835 and 838.5 (by reference). The Senior Living Facility will be detailed in a traditional manner, including a masonry base and accents, and provide warm earth tone colors. The Senior Living Facility will employ sloped roofs at a minimum 6:12 pitch. The medical / office facility design has a more modern feel however will share masonry materials with the senior living facility as well as other material cues. A manufactured wood veneer and composite metal panel elements accent the masonry and stucco structure. Both buildings provide a regular patterned window system and a variety of materials to subdivide exterior facades to minimize scale and enhance the community feel. Parking: There has been significant discussion regarding the amount of parking required for the proposed uses on the site. Currently 216 total parking spaces are provided across lots 3 and 4. This has been reduced by 4 stalls since the last application to comply with comments provided by City staff. 81 stalls (38%) are underground garage parking, minimizing additional impervious site coverage. The medical / office building requires 100 parking stalls and currently meets city ordinances for its use at 1 parking stall per 250 s.f. of area. The Senior Living Facility is currently allotted 120 parking stalls. The City of Medina does not recognize a service based senior living facility within its parking ordinances and therefore does not have a use type which can be properly applied in this situation. Currently we are calculating parking for this facility in the following manner: 45 Independent Living Units x 2.25 spaces / unit (Apartment use per Ordinance) = 102 stalls 30 Assisted Living Units x .4 spaces per unit (per City Staff) = 12 stalls 15 Memory Care / Special Care Suites x .35 spaces per unit (per City Staff) = 6 stalls Total calculated parking = 120 stalls Internally, ownership as well as the design team have evaluated a number of scenarios to ensure adequate parking is provided as it is a key component to the success of this development. Because there is not a specific ordinance which applies to this use, an alternate method of calculating parking based upon past experience and evaluation of other similar facilities results in the following: 45 Independent Living Units x 1.25 spaces per unit = 57 stalls 30 Assisted Living Units and Specialty Care Suites x .4 (per City staff) = 12 stalls Employee parking per shift = 28 stalls 90 total units x .25 guest parking (per Ordinance) = 23 stalls 3 Total calculated parking (alternative method) = 120 stalls Based on the parking evaluations above, we feel the proposed uses are adequately parked and will function as intended. Additional parking factors include: ■ Covenants between lots within the development allowing shared parking across lot lines to allow for ebb and flow of parking based on unique demand for certain occasions such as guest parking on holidays. ■ Private shuttle transportation provided by the Senior Living Facility reduces the need for residents to maintain a private vehicle. ■ The senior facility will maintain a minimum 50% assisted living units per the City's requirement however as the building matures, this percentage is likely to increase as a primary goal of the facility will be to allow residents to age in place. This would result in an additional decrease in demand for private vehicles on site in the future. Proposed site work: The site work will consist of the initial development of Lots 1, 3 and 4 and will include extending utilities through the site and the development of the main access drive. Overall site development will be consistent with the submitted Site Plan Review package with Lot 2 remaining a future phase. Sanitary sewer is currently available at the southwest corner of the site near the proposed outbuilding. Sanitary sewer service will be extended to the 2 proposed buildings and also along the proposed access drive to provide service for potential future development on the northern portion of the site. Watermain is currently available within the northern portion of the Highway 55 right of way. Water service will be extended to the 2 proposed buildings and also along the proposed access drive to provide service for potential future development on the northern portion of the site. Stormwater management is proposed to be handled on -site meeting all required rate, volume & quality requirements. All stormwater is proposed to be discharged to the existing onsite wetland complex. The plan currently has 2 retention ponds shown. In addition to these 2 major facilities, a number of smaller infiltration/filtration basins (rainwater gardens) will be developed within the project site. Project Phasing: Overall, site development will consist of Lots 1, 3 and 4 including construction of all underground utilities, site improvements, and landscaping. The Senior Living Facility on Lot 3 will be the first building to be constructed. The intent is to begin construction of the medical office / building on Lot 4 within the allotted city approval timeframe. 4 We look forward to a thoughtful discussion about this site and the potential benefits of its development. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Dean Lunski Lunski Inc. 1416 Mainstreet Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 5 GROSS AREA: WETLAND AREA: NET AREA: OUTLOT A 21,340 SF 1,594 SF 19,746 SF LOT 1 149,795 SF 34,734 SF 115,061 SF LOT 2 136,275 SF 43,611 SF 92,664 SF LOT 3 163,182 SF 33,052 SF 130,130 SF I I I F-- \C F— (3) rn II W U N CC O �rdSo a <'o t £E 30 6+ Scale In Feet L�J U 0_ N N W c'M The Lawrence L Pribyl Trust Lt. 3.0.9E10006 1:969 3.6C.LZ0LJpS rn PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER W/ MONUMENT SIGNS PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT ALL OF OUTLOT A TO BE DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT Thomas L Nichols PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT cn CD s. "s'L t� •b W rn M (16 CO W P I D 03-118-23-32-0007 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED THAT PART OF THE WEST 918.12 FEET OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1 LYING NORTHERLY OF HIGHWAY 55. EXCEPT THE WEST 75 FEET THEREOF EXCEPT ROAD SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 118 RANGE 23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN EXISTING ZONING IS RURAL COMMERCIAL HOLDING (RCH) PER CITY ZONING MAP DATED 01/23/14 H 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 wT�Tm ���'�LUNSKI'I'NC.[N' �r hh NS_,ij�- HILL Engineering, Inc. 1585DUNLAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55108 612.987.4455 Minnesota co — a) O • Up Z�Z O o� Q>- LUO U2u0w ILWZF- U WW� W �U(n 0_ZJW (A�}= • X J 1— O 0_WQO • }lc) =m<< H0HJ Q = W 2 H a �Wp� �a<a • ZZ v�(i� O WOw>O wCLCLWz ]: LU (n� LICENSE # N CO O O 0 2 U Project Architect C6 C Permit Submit Date M O O Project Number PRELIMINARY PLAT S1.0 C 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLC PHILIPS GARDCO ECF-S small Luminaire OrbfMEDINA kli-VAIG Qty Label Arrangement Lum. Lumens LLF Description Lum. Watts Total Watts BUG Rating 2 A2 BACK -BACK 17473 0.850 (2)ECF-S-48L-1A-NW-G2-5W 155 620 B5-UO-G3 9 B4 SINGLE 14892 0.850 ECF-S-48L-1.2A-NW-G2-4-UNV-LLC4-DD-BZ-HIS 185 1665 B1-U1-G3 2 B5 SINGLE 20041 0.850 ECF-S-48L-1_2A-NW-G2-5 179 179 B5-UO-G3 0 12 C SINGLE 12603 0.850 SFRP-5M-130LA-8053-NW 128 1664 B3-UO-G1 0 13 D SINGLE 718 0.850 BRM834-42-NW-360-UNV-BRP 41 533 B1-U2-G1 D 5 WP15 SINGLE 6910 0.850 LPW32-78-BZ 71 355 B2-UO-G2 I"• US Calculation hoiNttrYIEDINA SENIOR LIMING CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min FC at Property Line at Grade Illuminance Fc 0.05 0.8 0.0 N.A. N.A. FC Beyond Prop Line at Grade Illuminance Fc 0.00 0.4 0.0 N.A. N.A. Main Walkway FC at Grade Illuminance Fc 3.94 13.3 0.5 7.88 26.60 North Walkway FC at Grade Illuminance Fc 2.76 11.2 0.0 N.A. N.A. Paved Area FC at Grade Illuminance Fc 2.24 12.7 0.8 2.80 15.88 • Project. L.€ icatiort Cat_No: Type_ Qty: Notes_ The Philips Gardco EcoForm Gen-2 combines economy with performance in an LED area Luminaire_ Capable of delivering up to 26,400 lumens or more in a compact, low profile LED luminaire, EcoForm offers a new level of customer value_ EcoForm features an innovative retrofit arm kit_ simplifying site conversions to LED by eliminating the need to drill additional holes in most existing poles. Integral control systems available for further energy savings. LIGHT FIXTURE TYPES A2, B4, AND B5 �3SCALE 1/4" PHILIPS GARDCO Site & Area SlenderForm Found Post Top luminaire • Project Lotatiotc Cat_No: Type: Qty: Notes: Philips Gardco SLenderForm luminaires combine LED perforrna.nce excellence and advanced LED thermal management technology with a distinct styling to ;provide outdoor area lighting that is both energy efficient and aesthetically pleasing_ SlenderForm is defined by its high performance_ sleek low profile design and rugged construction. The advanced LED optical systems provide IES Types II. III. IV and V distributions. Surge protection included with all SlenderForrn Luminaires. LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE C SCALE 1/4" =1'-0" PHILIPS GARDCO Bollards Dome/bevel top louver BRM830/831/833 BRM834/835/837 • Protect_ Location. Ca«o: Type: Quantity: Motes. Philips Gardco dome and bevel top louver LED bollards provide uniform illumination, superior spacing and solid vandal resistance_ Lugged extruded and cast construction with silicone seals andgasketing assure years of durability_ Our advanced stack -louver LED technology and motion response provide maximized light output energy savings. A2 B4 & B5 C ALL FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHTS ARE SHOWN ADJACENT TO FIXTURE LOCATIONS ON PLAN o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 D GENERAL PARKING LOT GENERAL PARKING LOT PEDESTRIAN SCALE GENERAL PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING (COMMERCIAL) LIGHTING (SENIOR RESIDENTIAL) ILLUMINATION DETAIL ILLUMINATION - FULLY SHIELDED (>2,000 LMS) - FULL SHIELDED (>2,000 LMS) - FULLY SHIELDED (>2,000 LMS) SITE LIGHTING KEY SCALE 1/8" =1'-0" PHILIPS Mono Wall mount LytePro LEIS Sconce -1.1-111A LPW32 ALL VALUES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL MAINTAINED FOOTCANDLES AT GRADE FIXTURE DISTRIBUTION TEMPLATES ARE SHOWN AT 0.25MFC FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY VALUES DO NOT INCLUDE CONTRIBUTION FROM ADJACENT STREET OR PROPERTY LIGHTING 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 o.o o,o o.o o.0 0.0 to o.o o.o o.o ao o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o,o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o,o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o to 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o to o.o to o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o ao ao o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o ao o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +O.0 o.o no o.o o.o o.o o.o +o.o t.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o ou o.o to o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o t.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o t.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o +o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0- 99 A- 0:0 nn nn nn 0n 00 0,0 +00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 +0 0 0.0 0.0 +1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 J.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o,0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 o. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 tot) 0.0 0.0 0.0 al 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 it 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +00 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0. 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 3.8 2.8 2 3.7 3.3 2.5 2.4 .4 1.0 1.3 1 3I +1.4 1.5 2.0 +1.8 2.9 2.4 4.0 3.1 4.4 3.3 2 3.8 3.0 2.7 2.3 +1.8 +1.7 +.4 1.5 1.3 1.5 A +1.7 +Lb � .9 2.7 2 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.6 .0 +1.3 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 +1.1 +1.1 1 1 ;171= 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o +o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o ao o.o +o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o to.o o.o o.o +o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o +o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ton On nn On 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OII 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 it) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tot) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tot) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 it it i.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 23 4.2 4 MH: 12 +1.3 1. 0.9 +1.1 1.3 1.5 1.0 +L2 1.4 +L6 +1.7 0.8 +1.0 +1.2 +1.4 +1.6 +1.7 0.9 +1.1 1.3 +1.5 +1.6 1.6 7 +1.8 +1.0 1.1 1.3 1:4 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O. 2.0 2.5 +2.8 0.0 0.0 ! ! 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 ot) 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o ot) 0.0 to o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .0 U.0 O.0 O.0 0.0 LA 0.0 0.0 +2.2 +3.8 4.9 +1.2 +1.3 +1.4 +1.6 +1.6 1.6 +1.5 +1.4 .0 B5+1.9 +1.8 + 2 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.1 .l 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +i.! +! 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21505-01360 • F!rorject Location: Cat_No: Type: Quantity_ Notes. The Philips Stonco LytePro LED Small Wall Sconce LPW32 features outstanding value in a compact, architectural design. This hall sconce features state-of- the-art, long -life and maintenance savings, in a combined discreet LED package with high precision aver -optic design. This powerful and precise combination offers outstanding energy savings with excellent photometric performance. LPW32 is ideal for building perimeters and corridors in addition to wall lighting applications requiring strong lateral spacing and forward ,pattern projection. O.o o.o o.o o.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.1 +2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.0 +1.9 +i.R. +1.8 1.7 1.5 + 1.9 +1.9 +I." +1 8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.9 r41.9 1.8, -1"11-117, +1.6 -'...: 1.6 1.9� +7�8 +.5 1.4 1.8 1.9 °- +1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 + 1.9 u \ +1.6. 1.4 2.2 2.3 2.2 2: +1.6 +1.5 +1.8 2.2 2.6 2.9 +1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 +o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.1 to.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.i 0.1 0.0 0.0 ao 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O. 1.0 +00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.F 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 +0 0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 +0.0 ot) 0.0 tot) 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +1.7 2.3 8.1 2.6 6.3 +0.0 0.0 ao 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. "MH: N .• 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ao 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 ou o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1. 1.1 i.r i.l +. +. +11 +. +11 +1.1 +1 +11 +4 4 it +11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 00 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 O. 0.Q U.0 UM V.V u.V V.0 V.V UO VA V.V TLV 1.5 +1.9 2.7 3.4 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0. r .9 \-- 2.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 " 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0 0 (to 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 U.0 o,, U.XJ +1.7 2.0 2.6 3.5 +1.9 2.4 3.0 3 S 1.9 2.2 2.6 +�. 2.6 2 2.3 2.4 2:4 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.7B5 2.7 2.5 2.1 1..6" MIl: 22 + 2.5 �'�� 3.1 2.5 2.0 \ / 3.2 2.4 +1.8�// 2.2 2.6 2.5 2.1 1.6 1.2 19. 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.4 1.. 8 1.8 +. 1.s 1.2 + 1l.6 +1.6 +1.5 +1 3' +1.0 �-41+.7 I. 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.9 1.8 +1.5 1.3 1.7 +1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0 0 0.0 0.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 tot) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 +1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0. o.o o.o +o.o o.o o. o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O. o.o o.o o.o ot) o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.r3 ,0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o ou o.o ao of 0.0 0.0 O. + / 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 O. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O. MEDINA SENIOR LIVING -SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - PHILIPS LED SERIES 0.0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 o.o o.o to. +0.0 0.0 4: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 i.l i.it-11Y- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o no 0.0 o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 no 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of 0.0 ao ou +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 to 0.0 ao ou 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 no 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 to 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ot) 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o to 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 o.o o.o +o.0 0.0 0.0 o.o ou o.0 0.0 o.o +o.o o.o o.o .0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 ao ao o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O o.o o.0 0.0 o.o o.o +o.o o.o o.o O 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O +00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 to 0.0 to 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 no 0.0 0.0 ao 0.0 +0.0 no 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 ao no 0 0.0 0.0 ao ao 0.0 0.0 ao ao 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 alp ao 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ou 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 ao no 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 aci 0.0 0.0 l.0 +0.0 no 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 ao 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 ao 0 0.0 0.0 Ito 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 P.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 ao 0.0 0.0 0.0 it) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 (01) +0.0 m +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 .0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.. +0.0 +0.0 .0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.. +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 00 +0.0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 +00 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 ti.o UE i +o.o tto +o.o Ito +ao tot) tar) Ito 'no +o.o +no +o.o tot) tao +no tot) +ao ito +o.o 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 LUNSKI INC. Minnesota June 19, 2017 Project Architect Permit Submit Date Project Number SITE LIGHTING - PHOTOMETRIC LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE D LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE WP15 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ©2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLC tv 0 E 0 OVERALL SITE AREA: 10.8 ACRES (470,583 S.F.) TOTAL SITE AREA (APPROXIMATE) 3.94 ACRES (171,896 S.F.) DELINEATED WETLAND AREA - INCLUDING SETBACK AND BUFFER (APPROXIMATE) 6.86 ACRES* (298,687 S.F.) EFFECTIVE USEABLE SITE AREA *INCLUDES MINOR WETLAND IMPACT AT ACCESS DRIVE ELM CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT: 25' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER REQUIRED = 55,586 S.F. CITY OF MEDINA: 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER REQUIRED: 66,654 S.F. PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER: 69,104 S.F. CURRENT ZONING: RURAL COMMERCIAL HOLDING (RCH) PROPOSED ZONING: BUSINESS (B) SITE ADDRESS: PID #311823320007 PROPOSED USE: LOT 1: LOT 2: FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE BASED RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY (ASSISTED LIVING / INDEPENDENT LIVING SENIOR COMMUNITY) LOT 3: MEDICAL / OFFICE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (BUSINESS DISTRICT): 25' PARKING SETBACK (FRONT AND REAR) 20' PARKING SETBACK (SIDEYARDS) 40' FRONT YARD BUILDING SETBACK (50' FROM HIGHWAY 55) 30' FRONT YARD BUILDING SETBACK FROM PRIVATE DRIVE 25' REAR YARD BUILDING SETBACK* 25' SIDE YARD BUILDING SETBACK (SIDEYARDS)* * MAY BE REDUCED TO 15' WHEN SHARED AMENITIES EXIST (LOT 3 REQUIRES ADDITIONAL 6" SETBACK BASED UPON BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE 35') (LOT 2 REQUIRES ADDITIONAL 10' SETBACK BASED UPON BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE 35') PROPOSED F.A.R.: LOT 1: LOT 2: LOT 3: 4,320 S.F. / 147,642 S.F. = .03 FAR (FUTURE DEVELOPMENT) 99,587 S.F. / 134,240 S.F. = .74 FAR 24,767 S.F. / 166,089 S.F. = .15 FAR REQUIRED PARKING: SENIOR LIVING FACILITY: 80 TOTAL UNITS (MIN. 50% TO BE ASSISTED LIVING AND/OR SPECIALTY CARE) THE MEDINA CITY ORDINANCE DOES NOT IDENTIFY SENIOR LIVING OR SENIOR CARE FACILITY WITHIN SECTION 828.51, SUBD. 2, OFF STREET SPACES REQUIRED. SEE CALCULATED PARKING BELOW. MEDICAL / OFFICE BUILDING: 24,767 S.F. / 250 S.F. PER STALL =100 STALLS CALCULATED PARKING: SENIOR LIVING FACILITY (LOT 2): 40 IL UNITS x 2.25 SPACES PER UNIT = 90 STALLS 25 AL UNITS x .4 SPACES PER UNIT = 10 STALLS 15 MEMORY CARE / SPECIAL CARE SUITES x .35 SPACES / UNIT = 6 STALLS TOTAL SENIOR LIVING FACILITY PROPOSED PARKING =106 STALLS COMMERCIAL PARKING (LOT 3): TOTAL MEDICAL / OFFICE BUILDING PARKING = 24,767 / 250 S.F. PER STALL =100 STALLS TOTAL CALCULATED PARKING = 206 STALLS PROVIDED PARKING: LOT 2: 11 SURFACE STALLS + 48 GARAGE STALLS = 59 STALLS LOT 3: 99 SURFACE STALLS + 33 GARAGE STALLS =132 STALLS TOTAL PROVIDED PARKING =191 STALLS + 19 PROOF OF PARKING STALLS = 210 TOTAL STALLS AVAILABLE SHARED PARKING COVENANTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED BETWEEN LOTS 2 AND 3 PRIVATE SHUTTLE SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS WITHIN THE SENIOR LIVING FACILITY 14' PYLON SIGN; SEE - DETAIL #4/A4; INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED OUTLOT 22,621 S.F. / .52 ACRES WETLAND - IMPACT COMMUNITY GARDEN AREAS WALL SIGNAGE; SEE - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS MONUMENT SIGN; SEE DETAIL #5/A4 CLEAR VISION TRIANGLE CLEAR VISION - — ------____ TRIANGLE so, o so 18' PYLON SIGNAGE; SEE DETAIL #3/A4; INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED W/ DYNAMIC DISPLAY FUTURE CONNECTION W/ CHIPPEWA ROAD TRAIL ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SCALE 1" = 40'-0" RETAINING WALLS; TYPICAL 11 STALLS J a z o w o _ 9 �< �wm Oal- _w U_ a Y = .d- U c0 UQ + n o �o Z `{ f 0 0 - PATIO RETAINING WALL ---- DININ SECURED — MEMORY CARE COURTYARD SENIOR ASSISTED _,INDEPENDENT LIVING 3 STORY + GARAGE - 80 UNITS 48 GARAGE STALLS - 99,587 S.F. a ALL SIGNAGE; -SEE EXTERIOR EVATIONS WALL SIGNAGE; SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COVERED ENTRANCE (1ST FLOOR) 25' PARKING SETBACK ETBACK FROM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT >I 40' BUILDING SETBACK BOARDWALK GARAG OFFICE / MEDICAL 2 STORY + GARAGE \\33 GARAGE STALLS 24,767 S.F. REAR ENTRANCE (LOWER LEVEL TURN -AROUND AREA i LOT 1 147,642 S.F. 3.39 ACRES --- STAFF REQUESTED WALKING PATH CONNECTION TO INTERSECTION OF BRINDLE PATH DEVELOPMENT (NORTH SIDE OF CHIPPEWA RD.) HOWEVER THIS PROPERTY DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE IDENTIFIED INTERSECTION THUS IT CANNOT BE PROVIDED 1 -- BITUMINOUS PATH LOT 2 WETLAND 134,240 S.F. (MANAGE 1) 3.08 ACRES - DELIVERY VEHICLE TURNING TEMPLATE BASED UPON A 42' STRAIGHT BODY TRUCK TYP. U.N.O. 1 SKY FLO ABO AY CONNECTION AT 2ND R; MIN. 15'-0" CLEARANCE STREET GRADE OW RAG 1 , II I I I I UI mI LOT 3 166,089 S.F. 3.81 ACRES EMER ENCY VEHICLE TURNING TEMPL TE BASED UPON A 42' 1STRAIG `BODY TRUCK TYP. U.N.O. 1 EMERGE CY VEHICLE TURN AR UND - BASED UPON STAVE STANDARDS COMPACT \PARKING STALL RETENTION N6Sefaq- �k _ POND 25'pg4/4 6 SeTBgC� M1`_ / ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I II I I I I I II F LI fY' 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 ��AiNsT�� ' LUNSKI INC. x '1 J � ril N41 S - WA ' a) Minnesota August 28, 2017 2 U Project Architect (6 C Permit Submit Date M O Project Number ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN W F A -SITE 0 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLC ,t , F- O �Irn w C J' I U � I 0_ N_ 0 30 60 Scale In Feet W II N r` C6 0 C) co CN 0 � O O ICI P03C2 ��n i I 311 ffl 0005 AOL I,. f.. I � _, T T r �c2i� i• �I Intl I' -.I �-._. x. a Wem 997 `s IIIYYYI//1 \v� / , / 9C' 5 r I d 1 _ ® �\ 41 J �c4rj Ilk _I� 1 00 cL %, I N �N 0 � 994 CAI (n N' N rn / y (� / r % / ,. 992 J 1, I� _ Ikk Cal 00 - _ /, i / /0001 WE o \co, Ao - 4,j 7 - _ I .0000, / yam/ / � I C'0 r �' l l / 1/ -I L CN LIf�`ey � L W � / 61I�, / J _ 6� l l 1 i 7 /P 411 J 1 Ern C'0 CY) C� ) coN ,� , ILO co CO L CN 00 CN1 v\ w /� 06' - 0 O I - a, / y \ � it N `' , `' , 9.0 00 6' 6' \`\ 1 A ` ` \ x / l LN N On c \ ,95 \ I / Ir l 996 = - MM / / (y) C&I C CO C'0IN N / 1Ito Cf G m � ICY) 000000 00,Q / cCN/ II C� wLo S� , ` IX Im ' / / 0 y C LO %/ OW ♦� rn / N N LU ,0 c r N � r— N � � N N , O O W 1 g*41"ra ON -SITE TREES 1943 CAL -IN NITIAL TREE REMOVAL 191 CAL -IN OT 1 TREE REMOVAL 220 CAL -IN (FUTURE) OT 2 TREE REMOVAL 40.5 CAL -IN OT 3 TREE REMOVAL 355.0 CAL -IN TOTAL TREE REMOVAL 586.5 CAL -IN SAVED TREES 1356.5 CAL -IN NITIAL ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (10%) 194.3 CAL -IN OT 1 ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (15%) 187.7 CAL -IN OT 2 ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (15%) 6.1 CAL -IN OT 3 ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (15%) 69.0 CAL -IN NITIAL REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 0 CAL -IN OT 1 REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 0 CAL -IN OT 2 REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 34.5 CAL -IN OT 3 REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 286.0 CAL -IN TOTAL REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 320.5 # OF REPLACEMENT TREES (2") 160 TREES PROVIDED REPLACEMENT TREES 28 CAL -IN (TREE OVERSIZING) 42 CAL -IN (ADDITIONAL OVERSTORY) 70 CAL -IN NOTE: APPLICANT WILL BE PAYING CASH IN LIEU FOR THE REMAINING 250.5 (125 TREES) REQUIRED. TAG # DESCRIPTION LOCATION REMOVE/SAVE REASON TAG # DESCRIPTION LOCATION REMOVE/SAVE REASON 189 8"IRONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 270 27"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 190 10"IRONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 271 24"WHITE OAK LOT 1 S 191 9"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 272 42"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 192 9"CHERRY OFFSITE S OFFSITE 273 26"BUR OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 193 8"ASH OFFSITE S OFFSITE 274 8"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 194 11"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 275 8"AM ELM LOT 1 S 195 24"BUR OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 276 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 196 9"AM ELM LOT 3 R LOT 277 12"AM ELM LOT 1 S 197 8"AM ELM LOT 3 R LOT 278 12"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 198 8"ASPEN LOT 3 R INITIAL 279 8"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 199 8"ASPEN LOT 3 R LOT 280 10"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 200 10"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 281 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 201 8"BOX ELDER LOT 3 R LOT 282 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 202 9"SIB ELM LOT 3 R LOT 283 13"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 203 8.5"SIB ELM LOT 3 R LOT 284 9"CHERRY LOT 1 S 204 9"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 285 10"ASH LOT 1 S 205 8.5"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 286 10"ASH LOT 1 S 206 10"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 287 9"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 207 13"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R INITIAL 288 18"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 208 8"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 289 21"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 209 9"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 290 12"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 210 8"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 291 12"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 211 9"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 292 21"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 212 8.5"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 293 14: BUR OAK LOT 1 S 213 10"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 294 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 214 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 295 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 215 8.5"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 296 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 216 8"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 297 15"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 217 10"COTTONWOOD 0UTLOTA R INITIAL 298 18"WHITE OAK LOT S 218 10"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 299 16"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 219 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 300 16"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 220 8"COTTONWOOD 0UTLOTA R INITIAL 301 20"WHITE OAK LOT S 221 8.5"ASH OUTLOT A R INITIAL 302 8"RED OAK LOT 1 S 222 8.5"BOX ELDER OUTLOT A R INITIAL 303 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 223 8"WILLOW OFFSITE S OFFSITE 304 27BUR OAK LOT 1 S 224 13"WILLOW OUTLOT A R INITIAL 305 30"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 225 14"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 306 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 226 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 307 8"AM ELM LOT 1 S 227 14"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 R INITIAL 308 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 228 17"WILLOW LOT 1 R INITIAL 309 13"ASH LOT 1 S 229 15"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 310 9"ASH LOT 1 S 230 12"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 311 12"ASH LOT 1 S 231 15"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 312 8.5"ASH LOT 1 S 232 12"BOXELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 313 8"ASH LOT 1 S FUTURE 233 40"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 314 9"ASH LOT 1 S 234 24"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 315 8"ASH LOT 1 S 235 20"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 316 11"ASH LOT 1 R INITIAL 236 18"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 317 11"ASH LOT R LOT 237 14"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 318 9"ASH LOT R LOT 238 18"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 319 9"ASH LOT R LOT 239 12"BOX ELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 320 8.5"ASH LOT R LOT 240 25"BOX ELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 321 15"BUR OAK LOT R LOT 241 8"ASH LOT S FUTURE 322 8.5"ASH LOT R LOT 242 17"SIB ELM LOT 1 S FUTURE 323 8.5"RED OAK LOT R LOT 243 8"WILLOW LOT1 S FUTURE 324 8"ASH LOT R LOT 244 8"ASH LOT S 325 8"AM ELM LOT R LOT 245 8"ASH LOT 1 S 326 11"RED OAK LOT 3 R LOT 246 10"AM ELM LOT 1 S 327 40"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 247 10"AM ELM LOT 1 S FUTURE 328 24"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 248 10"BASSWOOD LOT S FUTURE 329 20"WHITE OAK LOT R LOT 249 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 330 15"IRONWOOD LOT R LOT 250 24"ASH LOT S 331 16"ASH LOT R LOT 251 30"BASSWOOD LOT S 332 20"WHITE OAK LOT R LOT 252 8"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S FUTURE 333 20"ASH LOT 3 R LOT 253 8"ASH LOT S 334 8"AM ELM LOT R LOT 254 8"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S 335 22"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 255 9"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S 336 9"BASSWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 256 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 337 9"BASSWOOD LOT R LOT 257 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 338 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 258 12"BASSWOOD LOT S 339 20"WHITE OAK LOT S 259 9"IRONWOOD LOT S 340 18"ASH LOT S 260 30"WHITE OAK LOT S 341 10"IRONWOOD LOT S 261 8"IRONWOOD LOT S 342 10"IRONWOOD LOT3 S 262 27"WHITE OAK LOT 1 S 343 18"WHITE OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 263 11"IRONWOOD LOT S 344 8"IRONWOOD LOT S 264 27"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 345 9"IRONWOOD LOT 3 S 265 10"IRONWOOD LOT S 346 9"IRONWOOD LOT S 266 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 347 13"IRONWOOD LOT S 267 8"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 268 9"AM ELM LOT 1 S 269 9"AM ELM LOT 1 S 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 LUNSKI INC. HILL Engineerng, Inc. 1585 DUNLAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55108 612.987.4455 E E O C.) 0) o a Cl) I OU W zDe W 0 LL }C)O N U��� LO U W W Q N W 0 U it dZJW - Z QOLLJ Ow CWj 2 m Q 0 °w =Q2ZQ ~a~ O LU LLL�'Z LW J ; WQ0Z� 00 N W�LWO O wlid0Q >-� = W Z) � � Q Q [1)0-C/) -)0 U O 00 2!!ro OD O M j 0 i (D (D E E Q (n Z m E TREE SURVEY CIO C 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GR OUP _C 0 30 60 Scale In Feet W II N r` C6 0 C) co CN 0 � O O ICI P03C2 ��n i I 311 ffl 0005 AOL I,. f.. I � _, T T r �c2i� i• �I Intl I' -.I �-._. x. a Wem 997 `s IIIYYYI//1 \v� / , / 9C' 5 r I d 1 _ ® �\ 41 J �c4rj Ilk _I� 1 00 cL %, I N �N 0 � 994 CAI (n N' N rn / y (� / r % / ,. 992 J 1, I� _ Ikk Cal 00 - _ /, i / /0001 WE o \co, Ao - 4,j 7 - _ I .0000, / yam/ / � I C'0 r �' l l / 1/ -I L CN LIf�`ey � L W � / 61I�, / J _ 6� l l 1 i 7 /P 411 J 1 Ern C'0 CY) C� ) coN ,� , ILO co CO L CN 00 CN1 v\ w /� 06' - 0 O I - a, / y \ � it N `' , `' , 9.0 00 6' 6' \`\ 1 A ` ` \ x / l LN N On c \ ,95 \ I / Ir l 996 = - MM / / (y) C&I C CO C'0IN N / 1Ito Cf G m � ICY) 000000 00,Q / cCN/ II C� wLo S� , ` IX Im ' / / 0 y C LO %/ OW ♦� rn / N N LU ,0 c r N � r— N � � N N , O O W 1 g*41"ra ON -SITE TREES 1943 CAL -IN NITIAL TREE REMOVAL 191 CAL -IN OT 1 TREE REMOVAL 220 CAL -IN (FUTURE) OT 2 TREE REMOVAL 40.5 CAL -IN OT 3 TREE REMOVAL 355.0 CAL -IN TOTAL TREE REMOVAL 586.5 CAL -IN SAVED TREES 1356.5 CAL -IN NITIAL ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (10%) 194.3 CAL -IN OT 1 ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (15%) 187.7 CAL -IN OT 2 ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (15%) 6.1 CAL -IN OT 3 ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (15%) 69.0 CAL -IN NITIAL REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 0 CAL -IN OT 1 REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 0 CAL -IN OT 2 REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 34.5 CAL -IN OT 3 REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 286.0 CAL -IN TOTAL REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 320.5 # OF REPLACEMENT TREES (2") 160 TREES PROVIDED REPLACEMENT TREES 28 CAL -IN (TREE OVERSIZING) 42 CAL -IN (ADDITIONAL OVERSTORY) 70 CAL -IN NOTE: APPLICANT WILL BE PAYING CASH IN LIEU FOR THE REMAINING 250.5 (125 TREES) REQUIRED. TAG # DESCRIPTION LOCATION REMOVE/SAVE REASON TAG # DESCRIPTION LOCATION REMOVE/SAVE REASON 189 8"IRONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 270 27"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 190 10"IRONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 271 24"WHITE OAK LOT 1 S 191 9"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 272 42"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 192 9"CHERRY OFFSITE S OFFSITE 273 26"BUR OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 193 8"ASH OFFSITE S OFFSITE 274 8"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 194 11"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 275 8"AM ELM LOT 1 S 195 24"BUR OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 276 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 196 9"AM ELM LOT 3 R LOT 277 12"AM ELM LOT 1 S 197 8"AM ELM LOT 3 R LOT 278 12"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 198 8"ASPEN LOT 3 R INITIAL 279 8"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 199 8"ASPEN LOT 3 R LOT 280 10"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 200 10"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 281 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 201 8"BOX ELDER LOT 3 R LOT 282 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 202 9"SIB ELM LOT 3 R LOT 283 13"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 203 8.5"SIB ELM LOT 3 R LOT 284 9"CHERRY LOT 1 S 204 9"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 285 10"ASH LOT 1 S 205 8.5"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 286 10"ASH LOT 1 S 206 10"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 287 9"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 207 13"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R INITIAL 288 18"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 208 8"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 289 21"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 209 9"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 290 12"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 210 8"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 291 12"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 211 9"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 292 21"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 212 8.5"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 293 14: BUR OAK LOT 1 S 213 10"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 294 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 214 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 295 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 215 8.5"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 296 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 216 8"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 297 15"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 217 10"COTTONWOOD 0UTLOTA R INITIAL 298 18"WHITE OAK LOT S 218 10"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 299 16"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 219 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 300 16"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 220 8"COTTONWOOD 0UTLOTA R INITIAL 301 20"WHITE OAK LOT S 221 8.5"ASH OUTLOT A R INITIAL 302 8"RED OAK LOT 1 S 222 8.5"BOX ELDER OUTLOT A R INITIAL 303 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 223 8"WILLOW OFFSITE S OFFSITE 304 27BUR OAK LOT 1 S 224 13"WILLOW OUTLOT A R INITIAL 305 30"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 225 14"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 306 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 226 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 307 8"AM ELM LOT 1 S 227 14"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 R INITIAL 308 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 228 17"WILLOW LOT 1 R INITIAL 309 13"ASH LOT 1 S 229 15"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 310 9"ASH LOT 1 S 230 12"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 311 12"ASH LOT 1 S 231 15"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 312 8.5"ASH LOT 1 S 232 12"BOXELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 313 8"ASH LOT 1 S FUTURE 233 40"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 314 9"ASH LOT 1 S 234 24"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 315 8"ASH LOT 1 S 235 20"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 316 11"ASH LOT 1 R INITIAL 236 18"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 317 11"ASH LOT R LOT 237 14"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 318 9"ASH LOT R LOT 238 18"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 319 9"ASH LOT R LOT 239 12"BOX ELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 320 8.5"ASH LOT R LOT 240 25"BOX ELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 321 15"BUR OAK LOT R LOT 241 8"ASH LOT S FUTURE 322 8.5"ASH LOT R LOT 242 17"SIB ELM LOT 1 S FUTURE 323 8.5"RED OAK LOT R LOT 243 8"WILLOW LOT1 S FUTURE 324 8"ASH LOT R LOT 244 8"ASH LOT S 325 8"AM ELM LOT R LOT 245 8"ASH LOT 1 S 326 11"RED OAK LOT 3 R LOT 246 10"AM ELM LOT 1 S 327 40"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 247 10"AM ELM LOT 1 S FUTURE 328 24"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 248 10"BASSWOOD LOT S FUTURE 329 20"WHITE OAK LOT R LOT 249 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 330 15"IRONWOOD LOT R LOT 250 24"ASH LOT S 331 16"ASH LOT R LOT 251 30"BASSWOOD LOT S 332 20"WHITE OAK LOT R LOT 252 8"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S FUTURE 333 20"ASH LOT 3 R LOT 253 8"ASH LOT S 334 8"AM ELM LOT R LOT 254 8"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S 335 22"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 255 9"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S 336 9"BASSWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 256 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 337 9"BASSWOOD LOT R LOT 257 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 338 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 258 12"BASSWOOD LOT S 339 20"WHITE OAK LOT S 259 9"IRONWOOD LOT S 340 18"ASH LOT S 260 30"WHITE OAK LOT S 341 10"IRONWOOD LOT S 261 8"IRONWOOD LOT S 342 10"IRONWOOD LOT3 S 262 27"WHITE OAK LOT 1 S 343 18"WHITE OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 263 11"IRONWOOD LOT S 344 8"IRONWOOD LOT S 264 27"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 345 9"IRONWOOD LOT 3 S 265 10"IRONWOOD LOT S 346 9"IRONWOOD LOT S 266 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 347 13"IRONWOOD LOT S 267 8"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 268 9"AM ELM LOT 1 S 269 9"AM ELM LOT 1 S 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 LUNSKI INC. HILL Engineerng, Inc. 1585 DUNLAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55108 612.987.4455 E E O C.) 0) o a Cl) I OU W zDe W 0 LL }C)O N U��� LO U W W Q N W 0 U it dZJW - Z QOLLJ Ow CWj 2 m Q 0 °w =Q2ZQ ~a~ O LU LLL�'Z LW J ; WQ0Z� 00 N W�LWO O wlid0Q >-� = W Z) � � Q Q [1)0-C/) -)0 U O 00 2!!ro OD O M j 0 i (D (D E E Q (n Z m E TREE SURVEY CIO C 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GR OUP _C NITIAL ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (10%) 194.3 CAL -IN OT 1 ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (15%) 187.7 CAL -IN OT 2 ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (15%) 6.1 CAL -IN OT 3 ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL (15%) 69.0 CAL -IN NITIAL REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 0 CAL -IN OT 1 REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 0 CAL -IN OT 2 REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 34.5 CAL -IN OT 3 REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 286.0 CAL -IN TOTAL REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENT 320.5 # OF REPLACEMENT TREES (2") 160 TREES PROVIDED REPLACEMENT TREES 28 CAL -IN (TREE OVERSIZING) 42 CAL -IN (ADDITIONAL OVERSTORY) 70 CAL -IN NOTE: APPLICANT WILL BE PAYING CASH IN LIEU FOR THE REMAINING 250.5 (125 TREES) REQUIRED. TAG # DESCRIPTION LOCATION REMOVE/SAVE REASON TAG # DESCRIPTION LOCATION REMOVE/SAVE REASON 189 8"IRONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 270 27"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 190 10"IRONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 271 24"WHITE OAK LOT 1 S 191 9"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 272 42"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 192 9"CHERRY OFFSITE S OFFSITE 273 26"BUR OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 193 8"ASH OFFSITE S OFFSITE 274 8"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 194 11"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 275 8"AM ELM LOT 1 S 195 24"BUR OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 276 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 196 9"AM ELM LOT 3 R LOT 277 12"AM ELM LOT 1 S 197 8"AM ELM LOT 3 R LOT 278 12"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 198 8"ASPEN LOT 3 R INITIAL 279 8"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 199 8"ASPEN LOT 3 R LOT 280 10"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 200 10"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 281 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 201 8"BOX ELDER LOT 3 R LOT 282 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 202 9"SIB ELM LOT 3 R LOT 283 13"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 203 8.5"SIB ELM LOT 3 R LOT 284 9"CHERRY LOT 1 S 204 9"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 285 10"ASH LOT 1 S 205 8.5"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 286 10"ASH LOT 1 S 206 10"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 287 9"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 207 13"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R INITIAL 288 18"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 208 8"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 289 21"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 209 9"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 290 12"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 210 8"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 291 12"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 211 9"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 292 21"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 212 8.5"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 293 14: BUR OAK LOT 1 S 213 10"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 294 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 214 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 295 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 215 8.5"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 296 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 216 8"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 297 15"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 217 10"COTTONWOOD 0UTLOTA R INITIAL 298 18"WHITE OAK LOT S 218 10"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 299 16"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 219 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 300 16"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 220 8"COTTONWOOD 0UTLOTA R INITIAL 301 20"WHITE OAK LOT S 221 8.5"ASH OUTLOT A R INITIAL 302 8"RED OAK LOT 1 S 222 8.5"BOX ELDER OUTLOT A R INITIAL 303 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 223 8"WILLOW OFFSITE S OFFSITE 304 27BUR OAK LOT 1 S 224 13"WILLOW OUTLOT A R INITIAL 305 30"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 225 14"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 306 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 226 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 307 8"AM ELM LOT 1 S 227 14"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 R INITIAL 308 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 228 17"WILLOW LOT 1 R INITIAL 309 13"ASH LOT 1 S 229 15"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 310 9"ASH LOT 1 S 230 12"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 311 12"ASH LOT 1 S 231 15"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 312 8.5"ASH LOT 1 S 232 12"BOXELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 313 8"ASH LOT 1 S FUTURE 233 40"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 314 9"ASH LOT 1 S 234 24"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 315 8"ASH LOT 1 S 235 20"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 316 11"ASH LOT 1 R INITIAL 236 18"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 317 11"ASH LOT R LOT 237 14"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 318 9"ASH LOT R LOT 238 18"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 319 9"ASH LOT R LOT 239 12"BOX ELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 320 8.5"ASH LOT R LOT 240 25"BOX ELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 321 15"BUR OAK LOT R LOT 241 8"ASH LOT S FUTURE 322 8.5"ASH LOT R LOT 242 17"SIB ELM LOT 1 S FUTURE 323 8.5"RED OAK LOT R LOT 243 8"WILLOW LOT1 S FUTURE 324 8"ASH LOT R LOT 244 8"ASH LOT S 325 8"AM ELM LOT R LOT 245 8"ASH LOT 1 S 326 11"RED OAK LOT 3 R LOT 246 10"AM ELM LOT 1 S 327 40"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 247 10"AM ELM LOT 1 S FUTURE 328 24"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 248 10"BASSWOOD LOT S FUTURE 329 20"WHITE OAK LOT R LOT 249 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 330 15"IRONWOOD LOT R LOT 250 24"ASH LOT S 331 16"ASH LOT R LOT 251 30"BASSWOOD LOT S 332 20"WHITE OAK LOT R LOT 252 8"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S FUTURE 333 20"ASH LOT 3 R LOT 253 8"ASH LOT S 334 8"AM ELM LOT R LOT 254 8"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S 335 22"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 255 9"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S 336 9"BASSWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 256 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 337 9"BASSWOOD LOT R LOT 257 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 338 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 258 12"BASSWOOD LOT S 339 20"WHITE OAK LOT S 259 9"IRONWOOD LOT S 340 18"ASH LOT S 260 30"WHITE OAK LOT S 341 10"IRONWOOD LOT S 261 8"IRONWOOD LOT S 342 10"IRONWOOD LOT3 S 262 27"WHITE OAK LOT 1 S 343 18"WHITE OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 263 11"IRONWOOD LOT S 344 8"IRONWOOD LOT S 264 27"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 345 9"IRONWOOD LOT 3 S 265 10"IRONWOOD LOT S 346 9"IRONWOOD LOT S 266 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 347 13"IRONWOOD LOT S 267 8"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 268 9"AM ELM LOT 1 S 269 9"AM ELM LOT 1 S 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 LUNSKI INC. HILL Engineerng, Inc. 1585 DUNLAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55108 612.987.4455 E E O C.) 0) o a Cl) I OU W zDe W 0 LL }C)O N U��� LO U W W Q N W 0 U it dZJW - Z QOLLJ Ow CWj 2 m Q 0 °w =Q2ZQ ~a~ O LU LLL�'Z LW J ; WQ0Z� 00 N W�LWO O wlid0Q >-� = W Z) � � Q Q [1)0-C/) -)0 U O 00 2!!ro OD O M j 0 i (D (D E E Q (n Z m E TREE SURVEY CIO C 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GR OUP _C NOTE: APPLICANT WILL BE PAYING CASH IN LIEU FOR THE REMAINING 250.5 (125 TREES) REQUIRED. TAG # DESCRIPTION LOCATION REMOVE/SAVE REASON TAG # DESCRIPTION LOCATION REMOVE/SAVE REASON 189 8"IRONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 270 27"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 190 10"IRONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 271 24"WHITE OAK LOT 1 S 191 9"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 272 42"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 192 9"CHERRY OFFSITE S OFFSITE 273 26"BUR OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 193 8"ASH OFFSITE S OFFSITE 274 8"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 194 11"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 275 8"AM ELM LOT 1 S 195 24"BUR OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 276 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 196 9"AM ELM LOT 3 R LOT 277 12"AM ELM LOT 1 S 197 8"AM ELM LOT 3 R LOT 278 12"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 198 8"ASPEN LOT 3 R INITIAL 279 8"BASSWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 199 8"ASPEN LOT 3 R LOT 280 10"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 200 10"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 281 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 201 8"BOX ELDER LOT 3 R LOT 282 9"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 202 9"SIB ELM LOT 3 R LOT 283 13"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 203 8.5"SIB ELM LOT 3 R LOT 284 9"CHERRY LOT 1 S 204 9"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 285 10"ASH LOT 1 S 205 8.5"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 286 10"ASH LOT 1 S 206 10"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 287 9"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 207 13"COTTONWOOD LOT 3 R INITIAL 288 18"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 208 8"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 289 21"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 209 9"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 290 12"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 210 8"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 291 12"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 211 9"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 292 21"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 212 8.5"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 293 14: BUR OAK LOT 1 S 213 10"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 294 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 214 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 295 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 215 8.5"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 296 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 216 8"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 297 15"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 217 10"COTTONWOOD 0UTLOTA R INITIAL 298 18"WHITE OAK LOT S 218 10"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 299 16"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 219 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 300 16"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 220 8"COTTONWOOD 0UTLOTA R INITIAL 301 20"WHITE OAK LOT S 221 8.5"ASH OUTLOT A R INITIAL 302 8"RED OAK LOT 1 S 222 8.5"BOX ELDER OUTLOT A R INITIAL 303 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 223 8"WILLOW OFFSITE S OFFSITE 304 27BUR OAK LOT 1 S 224 13"WILLOW OUTLOT A R INITIAL 305 30"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 225 14"COTTONWOOD OFFSITE S OFFSITE 306 20"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 226 9"COTTONWOOD OUTLOT A R INITIAL 307 8"AM ELM LOT 1 S 227 14"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 R INITIAL 308 24"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 228 17"WILLOW LOT 1 R INITIAL 309 13"ASH LOT 1 S 229 15"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 310 9"ASH LOT 1 S 230 12"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 311 12"ASH LOT 1 S 231 15"COTTONWOOD LOT 1 S 312 8.5"ASH LOT 1 S 232 12"BOXELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 313 8"ASH LOT 1 S FUTURE 233 40"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 314 9"ASH LOT 1 S 234 24"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 315 8"ASH LOT 1 S 235 20"WILLOW LOT 1 S FUTURE 316 11"ASH LOT 1 R INITIAL 236 18"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 317 11"ASH LOT R LOT 237 14"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 318 9"ASH LOT R LOT 238 18"WILLOW LOT S FUTURE 319 9"ASH LOT R LOT 239 12"BOX ELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 320 8.5"ASH LOT R LOT 240 25"BOX ELDER LOT 1 S FUTURE 321 15"BUR OAK LOT R LOT 241 8"ASH LOT S FUTURE 322 8.5"ASH LOT R LOT 242 17"SIB ELM LOT 1 S FUTURE 323 8.5"RED OAK LOT R LOT 243 8"WILLOW LOT1 S FUTURE 324 8"ASH LOT R LOT 244 8"ASH LOT S 325 8"AM ELM LOT R LOT 245 8"ASH LOT 1 S 326 11"RED OAK LOT 3 R LOT 246 10"AM ELM LOT 1 S 327 40"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 247 10"AM ELM LOT 1 S FUTURE 328 24"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 248 10"BASSWOOD LOT S FUTURE 329 20"WHITE OAK LOT R LOT 249 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 330 15"IRONWOOD LOT R LOT 250 24"ASH LOT S 331 16"ASH LOT R LOT 251 30"BASSWOOD LOT S 332 20"WHITE OAK LOT R LOT 252 8"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S FUTURE 333 20"ASH LOT 3 R LOT 253 8"ASH LOT S 334 8"AM ELM LOT R LOT 254 8"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S 335 22"BUR OAK LOT 3 R LOT 255 9"WHITE ASH LOT 1 S 336 9"BASSWOOD LOT 3 R LOT 256 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 337 9"BASSWOOD LOT R LOT 257 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 338 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 258 12"BASSWOOD LOT S 339 20"WHITE OAK LOT S 259 9"IRONWOOD LOT S 340 18"ASH LOT S 260 30"WHITE OAK LOT S 341 10"IRONWOOD LOT S 261 8"IRONWOOD LOT S 342 10"IRONWOOD LOT3 S 262 27"WHITE OAK LOT 1 S 343 18"WHITE OAK OFFSITE S OFFSITE 263 11"IRONWOOD LOT S 344 8"IRONWOOD LOT S 264 27"BUR OAK LOT 1 S 345 9"IRONWOOD LOT 3 S 265 10"IRONWOOD LOT S 346 9"IRONWOOD LOT S 266 8"BASSWOOD LOT S 347 13"IRONWOOD LOT S 267 8"BASSWOOD LOT 1 S 268 9"AM ELM LOT 1 S 269 9"AM ELM LOT 1 S 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 LUNSKI INC. HILL Engineerng, Inc. 1585 DUNLAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55108 612.987.4455 E E O C.) 0) o a Cl) I OU W zDe W 0 LL }C)O N U��� LO U W W Q N W 0 U it dZJW - Z QOLLJ Ow CWj 2 m Q 0 °w =Q2ZQ ~a~ O LU LLL�'Z LW J ; WQ0Z� 00 N W�LWO O wlid0Q >-� = W Z) � � Q Q [1)0-C/) -)0 U O 00 2!!ro OD O M j 0 i (D (D E E Q (n Z m E TREE SURVEY CIO C 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GR OUP _C 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 LUNSKI INC. HILL Engineerng, Inc. 1585 DUNLAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55108 612.987.4455 E E O C.) 0) o a Cl) I OU W zDe W 0 LL }C)O N U��� LO U W W Q N W 0 U it dZJW - Z QOLLJ Ow CWj 2 m Q 0 °w =Q2ZQ ~a~ O LU LLL�'Z LW J ; WQ0Z� 00 N W�LWO O wlid0Q >-� = W Z) � � Q Q [1)0-C/) -)0 U O 00 2!!ro OD O M j 0 i (D (D E E Q (n Z m E TREE SURVEY CIO C 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GR OUP _C OUTLOT A LOT 2 LOT 2 LOT 3 GROSS AREA: 23,493 SF 147,642 SF 134,240 SF 166,089 SF ELM CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT REQUIRED 25' WETLAND BUFFER = 55,586 S.F. WETLAND AREA: 1,594 SF 34,734 SF 43,611 SF 33,052 SF CITY OF MEDINA REQUIRED 30' WETLAND BUFFER = 66,654 S.F. NET AREA: 21,899 SF 112,908 SF 90629 SF 133,037 SF FLOOR AREA: 0 SF 0 SF 99,762 SF 24,767 SF PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER = 68,045 S.F. F.A.R.: 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.15 IMPERVIOUS AREA: 9,725 SF 4,903 SF 54,253 SF 51,920 SF % IMPERVIOUS(GROSS): 41.4% 3.3% 40.4% 31.3% % IMPERVIOUS(NET): 44.4% 4.3% 59.8% 39.0% I 3,,C0,9C�o00,S U) 00 / ('7 _ 464m64 T_ �MJ 1 / - - - / 01) 0 I Qj r /� LO C I to 1� y r I I I I I I w LLJ 52 � —/ 2 ~ I I 1 , ' o3 b o b 0 S r§1 �/ STORMWAT I I -i� mow' 9 o v% J PROPOSED WETLAND `p i�0 BUFFER W/ MONUMENT SIGN Eo WETS `// 0 �1 . POROUS BITUMINOUS v/ S g ZS S 0 0 3,�'O� O PAVEMENT _ F LI / �� 15' WETLAND BUFFER -�- 00Li / cc � g, L \ SETBACK \ - / < V ♦ �, /-� M / I I 1 30' WETLAND BUFFER � - -r 289m6l 1 I I� CO ,^LnLO C 0 / PROPOSED DRAINAGE� 1 Y BIOFILTRATION BASIN UTILITY EASEMENTco Conj LOCVO, 11111111 00.a, 1 c6 M - 'IV 0 J Or) ~ I 1 90 DELINEF TED WETLAN� �S1 L" ` CO BOUNDARY \ \ I < �2 ~ 1 n = \ I (OV \ o ge� n PROPOSED DI I 1 \ C� \ O�� ' \ C7 UTILITY EASE[ 1,0 8 SF WETLAND _ IMPAC� MINIMIZATION VIA USE OF BOARDWALK i I 1 W CAI , CO 0 _______ _ C CN I 1--- w / \ \ SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR 1 O 1 i 1� BUILDING DIMENTIONS o ♦♦ PREFABRICATED ALUMINUM 1 I 1 r - 6, ( = I PIER SUPPORTED I to \ O ♦♦ o I I II BOARDWALKco II 1 (OVER WETLAND) \ 1 g I� \ CC) I I 1 POROUS BITUMINOUS / L------------� \ �� PAVEMENT F- F- -1 BtT-VMiN06USI TRH �_1_ \ ; .. � � \ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I F N � r- J I I I LJ I I I I L, \ , I �\ A �� I L - - RETAININGWALL (- I O� \ I ` If F_� I o 259" " r 1 I — r- - cvl I I 5 1 I �1 S � �� 3 / co � 1 r I I Qj O> Col 0_11 F STOIRMWATER POND W L 19, / I I I 1 I \ 24" ry - I 3,348 SF WELAND I / N y� I I I - - 1 IMPACT MINIMIZ TION `-� f- r I VIA USE OF RETAINING ALLCD TUMINOUS T 1�'AIL g, 00 0i LIJ Cj I CDJ CV g CY) 00 rn 2,360 S.F WETLAND IMPACT / 90 _ t' o S w_ II (MITIGATION TO BE VIA PURCHASING p HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS I WETLAND BANK CREDITS) PAVEMENT 09691 3n6C,Lzoo S GG U I 0 30 60 — I h F�l Scale In Feet w 41 4' / 1 I rn l •/ 0" / 0') < 4,(j 4.4j co 00 4,j c� 4 / Oq / (0 / / 00 w l d� / O 7 Y • M / (.0 00 w Ak O \ / Y / 9) 1 / r� O 17 • V 7/ DEPRESSED IS AND W/ RIBBON CU B / (TYPICAL) k/ 0 0 POROUS ASPHALT HEAVY-DUTY ASPHALT BITUMINOUS TRAIL CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TYPICAL FULL SIZE 900 PARKING STALL IS 9' X 19' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL PRIVATE CURB AND GUTTER TO BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ADA PEDESTRIAN RAMPS W/TRUNCATED DOMES TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL CURB CROSSINGS OF SIDEWALK. SIGNAGE & STRIPING NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. HANDICAPPED PARKING PROVIDED PER ADA CODE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL HANDICAPPED STALLS, HANDICAPPED LOGOS AND CROSS HATCH HANDICAPPED LOADING AISLES WITH BLUE PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT, 4" IN WIDTH. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS, AS SHOWN, IN WHITE PAINT. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING WHERE REQUIRED. ALL SIGNAGE NOT PROTECTED BY CURB, LOCATED IN PARKING LOT OR OTHER PAVED AREAS TO BE PLACED IN STEEL CASING, FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND PAINTED YELLOW. ALL SIGNS TO BE PLACED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. HANDICAP SIGNAGE TO BE INSTALLED 60"-66" HIGH AS MEASURED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN AS REQUIRED BY MN CODE. 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 ' LUNSKI INC. ' H I L L Engineerng, Inc. 1585 DUNLAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55108 612.987.4455 E E O V � o C: C6, U) Cl) 0 � ■ � 45) i i lei OU W zW = Oo w >.00 N U.2U)J) LO V)LJWQ N WC)U *k 0- Z J W LU ZX-J~ z QOw� U O =maw . �L~W =Q2Za � Q_ o >WOz LL ti a 1110 Q wQOZ� 00 U> O JN > coJ C0 wOf0�ww o w aa-0Q =WZ)Of�- QQ _OfcnCLcn �o `° Cl) o 00 N OD 0 m M U � � L QJ)z E SITE PLAN C10 C 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GR LLC OUP ££I I E 1.V P88 , M„80,980005 �. \ 997 ,/ H13M� - ------ 995 / / 994 CN 993 P _ s 992 % / / � �� Cb h O / Iv 3 v 991 / \ / p�� \lam ✓� f��' / 30'WETLAND BUFFER /1 / � � I5.1 MAXIMUM SLOPE WITHIN �' If PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER ✓ �.- "# BUFFER AREA -I- - (TYPICAL) -Y' \30' WETLAND BUFFER / �V1 < O/J/ A / Q I L / / Y G 7 / 0,,�eT� to - (`e // e 19 M I�L.0 i s CD A U_t66 ILL! v / LL �P, LL, 2`� V I L.LJ I I I CAI � � � vvI � �� � � � � � � �e / � � v`v /��� ,I � �°� sp / � �'`v 1 � ` Not 00? Lq Lo Lo III \ rn Ern 1 \ V� pa rn - 01���� % ^> I I M 6 I II L i II I �/%V� v �* W LL ,F ��61�� LL `v / W o / / I o �l' n I � r� �7 r��vT� V �ya I I - 1 F 05 a' /v / 1� ➢ / IF Co/ r � sg / I 45 CD o mI 'w U 992 - m ory5 \ �o r / \, 1 / / -- 994 v m ^ �Ile - 995 ' A 1 1 o. a 1` � l I M �� �� J� �� _��______ i'M _ /� �� O F I / I -- - - " I fml -_-'' Fl- ��L++..�IE•. i�i hM TW TW 994.5 vrs9/% aawssa QV9\V ZVo0pS / __U 9. ' 0 30 3:1 N / / � w I MAXIMUM 6(1 / ^I SLOPE /--• - J (TYPICAL) / � ✓ / \ Scale In Feet I/ LUNSKI INC. \ 0 14 1595 NUKAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55158 '1298'14e55 E E L) J � L � 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CO TACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' WITHIN TWO WORKING •- DAYS PRIOR TO EXCA ATION/ CONSTRUCTION, FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN O CITIES METRO AREA: 51-454-0002 OR TOLL -FREE: 1-800-252-1166. W 2, CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOP GRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHA L IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES VARIATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR S LL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 4. INSTALL PERI TER EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES BEFORE m BEGINNING TE GRADING ACTIVITIES SOME EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS BALE CHECKS AN TEMPORARY SILT PONDS MAY BE INSTALLED AS GRADING OCCURS IN THE SP CIFIC AREA, MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROLS THROUGHOUT THE GRADING ROCESS AND REMOVE WHEN TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.. 5. CONTACC OR TO ADHERE TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTR AGENCY N P.D.E.S. PERMIT, INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENT TO MINIMIZE THE A A DISTURBED BY GRADING AT ANY GIVEN TIME AND TO COMPLETE TURF RESTO ATION WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT AFTER COMPLETION OF GRAD G OF AN AREA. 6. ALL XPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WATER OF THE STATE OR ANY ST RMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WHICH IS CONNECTED TO A WATER OF THE ST TE MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 DAYS. 7. L CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE SURFACED WITH CRUSHED ROCK ACROSS FULL WIDTH FROM ENTRANCE POINT TO 50 FEET INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE SEE DETAIL. INSTALL ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES FOR STAGING AREA AND OTHER SITE ACCESS LOCATIONS AS NEEDED. 8 INLET PROTECTION IS TO BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEE DETAIL. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN i ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, WATERSHED DISTRICT AND N.P.D.E.S. PERMITS. 10 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION 11. MAINTAIN EXISTING EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES. RE-ESTABLISH ANY EXISTING EROSION CONTROL DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION. 12, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION 13 REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS. 15 IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. 16. SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS DAILY AS NEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 17. INSPECT EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. IMMEDIATELY REPAIR FAILED OR FAILING EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. 18. SEDIMENT REMOVAL - SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH O O W W STORM EVENT. Z �_ F � LL 19. ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICE IS NO Q > W O LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE GRADED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, U !Eto 1n 00 PREPARED, AND SEEDED WITH THE APPROPRIATE SEED MIX AS DIRECTED BY THE LL x Z 3 N OWNER. IU O U 20. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOIL ENCOUNTERED ON THE N 7 y 2 N SITE WITH EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL, DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER Q0: F- Z UNSTABLE MATERIAL. STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AND GRANULAR FILL AT LOCATIONS J OO U DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. LL W w Q A 21. EXISTING GRANULAR MATERIALS SHALL BE .SEGREGATED AND STOCKPILED FOR W } Q 7�1_I��\\\\ REUSE ON -SITE. co W \. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RE -SPREAD EXISTING ON -SITE Q R = Q TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM THICKNESS ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE Z F a H SODDED OR SEEDED. y W p Z O LLRZ W I, 23. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO O F EL Q _Li o HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP W 4 O Z Ip SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING 1� 10 N PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID } 3 N N LL J UNDERMINING OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT. W W W = o 24, GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES, CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO U w IL EL O ¢ y F SUBGRADE ELEVATION, LEAVE SITE READY FOR FINISH CONSTRUCTION. = W D 0' f Q Q 25 COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL RESULT IN ALL AREAS BEING GRADED TO PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION', BUILDING PAD AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE SITE PLAN _ o AND PAVEMENT SECTION DETAILS FOR LOCATION AND LIMITS OF BITUMINOUS m PAVEMENT SECTIONS 26. FINAL GRADING TOLERANCES ARE t0.1 FEET OF PLAN GRADES. o 27. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY Z ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF THE O Y CONSTRUCTION SITE. JD E E d 28. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING AND SLOPING THE FINISHED GROUND � Q � Z SURFACE TO PROVIDE SMOOTH & UNIFORM SLOPES, WHICH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AND PREVENT BONDING IN LOWER AREAS. w N E 0 CONTACT ARCHITECT IF FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO GRADING PLANS ARE REQUIRED. m o o ❑ a- a 0- 29. FINISHED GROUND AND SOD ELEVATION ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE 6" O - BELOW FLOOR ELEVATION. SLOPE GROUND AWAY FROM BUILDING A MINIMUM OF 6" IN 10 FEET, BEYOND 10 FEET REFER TO PLAN GRADES. 30. UNDER PAVEMENTS COMPACT THE UPPER THREE FEET OF SUBGRADE TO 100% LL GRADING STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND 957. PLAN STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BELOW THE UPPER THREE FEET OF SUBGRADE. OUTSIDE OF PAVEMENT AREAS COMPACT EMBANKMENTS TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 31. INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING W/ DUST FILTER FABRIC AROUND C4. O CONSTRUCTION SITE & PROJECT STAGING AREA AS NEEDED. 0 l 201 / MOMENTUM DESIGN I LLC F- 'll I 1C. �- 1 4 L.F. 8" 8" F 0 C.6Irn rn W 41 U N 96 L.F. 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 8" PLUG IE=980.5 0 30 60 Scale In Feet 24" RC APRON IE 993.15 GENERAL UTI NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' WITHIN TWO WORKING DAYS PRIO1 TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CITIES MEIRO AREA: 651-454-0002 OR TOLL -FREE: 1-800-252-1 166. 2. PRIOR T CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING /UTILITY Y OCATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN. ANY DISCREPANCY PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER ATELY. TILITY CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF UILDING PIPE SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING SERVICE CONNECTIONS. TILITY WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF A SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. ACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SEWER, AND PLUMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITY'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT. TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR UM DRY DENSITY (ASTM D698.78 OR AASHTO T-99) FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN THREE FEET OF THE GROUND SURFACE AND 100% STANDARD PROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. 7. FIELD ADJUST ALL CASTINGS TO MATCH FINAL GRADES. 8. CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REQUIRES INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF MEDINA. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF MEDINA 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF WORKING WITHIN THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY. CITY INSPECTORS MUST OBSERVE ALL WORK COMPLETED WITHIN THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY INCLUDING REMOVAL OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, EXCAVATION OF TRENCHES, PLACEMENT OF WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER, UTILITY CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING LINES, BACKFILLING AND PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE PIPE IS P.V.C. SDR 35 FOR UP TO 18 FOOT DEPTH OF INSTALLATION,SDR 26 FOR 18 FOOT TO 26 FOOT DEPTH OF INSTALLATION AND DR 18 OVER 26 FOOT DEPTH OF INSTALLATION. ALL SERVICE PIPE IS P.V.C. SDR 26. 2. MANHOLES SHALL BE 48" DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-1642 WITH TYPE "B" COVER. MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO AND A MAXIMUM OF FOUR ADJUSTMENT RINGS. 3. CONSTRUCTION IS TO WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. 4. ALL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL BE MADE BY CORE DRILLING THE MANHOLE AT THE PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS AND INSTALLING A "KOR-N-SEAL" RUBBER BOOT OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. GROUT IN THE BOOT AND FORM AN INVERT FOR THE NEW SEWER LINE. FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR BRICK STRUCTURES, CONSTRUCT AN OPENING EQUAL TO THE PIPE SIZE, GROUT AROUND PIPE TO CLOSE OPENING, AND REPAIR STRUCTURE TO CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TYPE OF CONNECTION WITH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY REQUIRED CITY INSPECTIONS NEEDED FOR CITY ACCEPTANCE. WATER MAIN NOTES 1. WATERMAIN SHALL BE C900 PVC CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/AWWA CL51/A21.51 AND C104/A21.4. 2. FITTINGS SHALL BE CLASS 250 CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/AWWA C110/A21.10 OR ANSI/AWWA C 153/A21 .53. 3. HYDRANTS SHALL BE THE PACER AS MANUFACTURED BY WATEROUS CO. OR APPROVED EQUAL COMPLYING WITH THE THE CITY OF MEDINA. 4. GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WITH RESILIENT SEAT MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C509. 5. WATER MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A 10 FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION TO THE STORM AND SANITARY SEWERS UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 6. WATER MAIN ELEVATION SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROVIDE AN 18" MINIMUM CLEARANCE TO STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWERS AND SANITARY SERVICES AT ALL CROSSINGS. 7. CONSTRUCTION IS TO WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. 8. ALL WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA SPECIFICATIONS. 9. RESTRAIN WATER MAIN JOINTS BEYOND FITTINGS AND HYDRANT AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF MEDINA STANDARD SPEC FOR UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION. 10. ALL MECHANICAL JOINTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED WITH MEGALUGS. 11. ALL WATERMAIN FITTINGS INSTALLED WITH COR-BLUE BOLTS. 12. LENGTH OF PIPE SHOWN ON PLAN FOR HYDRANT LEADS ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF WATERMAIN TO CENTER OF HYDRANT. 13. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE ENCASEMENT PER CITY STANDARDS. 14. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF 7.5' COVER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C600 AND CONDUCTIVITY PROVISIONS CONFORMING TO ANSI/AWWA C111/A21.11. BEFORE BEING PLACED IN SERVICE, THE COMPLETED WATERMAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED AND FLUSHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C651 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. z O FM U FM N z O (a) 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 HILL Engineerng, Inc. 1585 DUNLAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55108 612.987.4455 E E O C.) ED U) o r J CCU Cl) ■ � CU l l l OU W ZW 2 O_o LL 0 N U)LO U W W Q N WC)U - It 0- Z J W W J Z QO�w U_ �LU W<Q 2 m Q �LLJ 0~LLJ =Q2Za 0- 1­- >_WOZO LLZW d J Q W<0ZR 00 0 JN Cj) LIL Joo w��ww o wa0-LL OQ >_� =WZ)OfI- QQ _10�U)a.U) -)0 � v C)00 C) 2!! OD O M U � � L Q J) Z m E UTILITY PLAN C5nO C 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GR OUP M LLC I / I 0 30 60 Scale In Feet z O C� LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 1 OVERSTORY TREE PER 50 FEET OF LOT PERIMETER 1 ORNAMENTAL TREE PER 100 FEET OF LOT PERIMETER Cn 1 SHRUB PER 30 FEET OF LOT z TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH = 2,133 FEET O V REQUIRED # OF OVERSTORY TREES = 43 w REQUIRED # OF ORNAMENTAL TREES = 22 O REQUIRED # OF SHURBS = 72 LL REQUIRED PARKING LOT AREA GREEN SPACE = 8% FM PARKING LOT AREA = 54,872 SF O PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE PROVIDED = 47431 SF (8.08%) z 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 ti LUNSKI INC. TJIU NS_ XA HIEL Engineering, Inc. 1585DUNLAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55108 612.987.4455 E E O V � o U) r J � O 4� Cl) M 4� OU w zw = L- O_o W ~ } 00 N U�UWcn LO Uww< N w C) - it wz—iw w Z �O�w U_ �w<Q J � C) Ld W =Q=zQ �q- �- O LL�°WI4 ;0 W 0 00 U 0 JN ���W �� m > W 0 = O LLJ a..0-OQ � =W::) C� �- QQ _�UaU �o ti 2 (6 M 00 U 0 (O 00 0 j 0 i (D .(Q L E i U � U o LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll sO ®2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GRC )UP LLC GENERALNOTES I LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT. 3, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CUDES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND MATERIALS SUPPLIED 4, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NE ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, 5LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FUR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10' CLEARANCE). 5, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. 7, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROUT SYSTEMS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. 8, EXISTING :CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND UPPER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME, 9, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. CHANGES IN ALIGNMENT AND GRADES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. 10 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY, UNDESIRABLE SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. 11LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE. REPAIR OF ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 12. EXISTING TREES OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUB MASSINGS FOUND ON SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVED OR ARE LOCATED IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED. QUESTIONS REGARDING EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL 13. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, UPON DIRECTION OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, SHALL BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD WOOD, DAMAGED AND RUBBING BRANCHES 14. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FUR THE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION INSPECTION OF LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FINAL PAY REQUEST It. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLE AS -BUILT DRAWING(S) OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION, IRRIGATION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING NOTES 1. NO LOW VOLTAGE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING IS INC1...IJDED IN THE PROJECT. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH & INSTALL ELECTRICAL OUTLET AT NW & SW CORNERS OF THE UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE FOR FUTURE SYSTEM. LANDSCAPE NOTES PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS 1. NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA, 2PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STUCK, ANSI Z601. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST S CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT, ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO 'V' CRUTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROUT BALL, STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE PAVED SURFACE. 3, PLANT SYMBOLS ON PLAN DRAWING TAKES PRECEDENCE EVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST, SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE EVER NOTES, 4, PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE STAKING OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO DIGGING. 5, NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS GRANTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BID. 6. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS 7, PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. 8, PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL, OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS OR MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OP GRANULAR 10-0-5 OF 12 OZ, PER 2.5" CALIPER TREE AND 6 OZ. PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10-0-10 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER, 9, PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS SCREENED COMPOST AND 10 PARTS SAND OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, IS. TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE TWO -WALLED PLASTIC SHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUNK FLARE TO FIRST BRANCH, WRAP SMOOTH -BARKED DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER1 AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1, 11, 3/16" THICK STEEL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS AND ANNUALS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS SOD AT GRADE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALUMINUM EDGER USED ON GREEN ROOF. 12, SHRUB AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 13 TREES ARE TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AND SHALL HAVE NU MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE TREE TRUNK. 14MAINTENANCE STRIPS, WHERE ILLUSTRATED, TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS OR IN SPECIFICATIONS, 15, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE, NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED 16, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15 17, CONIFEROUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO OCTOBER L FALL DECIDUOUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15, ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 18RAINWATER GARDENS AND BOULEVARD TREES TO RECEIVE 4" OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE AREAS TO RECEIVE 3" OF CLEAN RIVER ROCK MULCH, TURF NOTES 1. SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. 3. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE .STAGGERED JOINTS ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY, 4. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING SEED & SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15, 5. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO NOVEMBER 1, FALL SEEDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO SEPTEMBER 15. ADJUSTMENTS TO SOD/SEED PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ON PROPERTY WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651-454-0002) PRIOR TO STAKING PLANT LOCATIONS, 2. VERIFY ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS. WITH REMOVALS AND SITE WORK. CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF -SITE, 3. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4" TOPSOIL IN LAWN AREAS AND 12" TOPSOIL IN LANDSCAPE BEDS. ADD 'SOIL AMENDMENTS FOR OPTIMUM PLANT GROWTH. 4. ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED AREAS, NOT INDICATED TO HAVE ROCK MULCH TO BE SODDED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. ROCK MULCH AREAS: ROCK MULCH TO BE PRIMARILY IN SHRUB BED LOCATIONS AND AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. ROCK MULCH SHALL BE CLEAN RIVER ROCK MULCH, OR APPROVED SUBSTITUTE. MUCCH SHALL BE FREE OF SOIL, LARGE STONES, BRANCHES, DEBRIS OR OTHER FOREIGN MATTER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ROCK MULCH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" DEPTH OVER FILTER FABRIC. 6. SODDED AREAS: SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS, FREE OF LAWN GRASS WEEDS. MATCH INTO EXISTING, AS APPLICABLE. ANCHOR SOD ON SLOPED OR POTENTIAL EROSION AREAS, OR AS REQUIRED. MATCH SOD EDGE FLUSH WITH EXISTING FINISH GRADE. ROLL SOD TO PROVIDE SMOOTH GRADE. STAKE ALL SODDED SLOPES 4:1 OR GRATER. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY UNTIL SEED IS ESTABLISHED. 7. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON PLAN, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF PLAN AND SCHEDULE DO NOT MATCH. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMAN. ADD FERTILIZER, HERBICIDE, AND PESTICIDE AS NECESSARY FOR OPTIMUM GROWTH. 8. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE EDGED WITH STEEL EDGING, 3/16-INCH THICK BY 5-INCH HIGH, BY COLLIER METAL SUPPLIES INC, OR APPROVED EQUAL, ANCHORED WITH METAL STAKES PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 9. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM 4" DEPTH, FREE OF ALL DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. OWNER TO APPROVE OF MULCH, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10. SINGLE TREE PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A 4" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RING AROUND EACH BASE. DECIDUOUS PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 3' DIAMETER RING, EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A RING TO THE DRIP LINE, AND SHRUB BEDS SHALL HAVE A 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH THROUGHOUT ENTIRE SHRUB BED AREA. 11. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN AND WATER PLANT MATERIAL DURING INSTALLATION AND FOR A 60 ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. VOLUME OF WATER TO BE PER PLANT REQUIREMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND NORMAL GROWTH. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. 12, CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW SOD FOR 60 DAYS UPON SUBSTANTIAL PROJECT COMPLETION. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLAN MATERIAL FOR TWO YEAR UPON PROJECT COMPLETION AND OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE. ALL REPLACEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 14. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE INSPECTED ON SITE PRIOR TO PLANTING BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 15. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS, THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY, SHALL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESIRABLE LIMBS AND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DESIRABLE APPEARANCE AND COMPLETED BY A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL. CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION AND DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF -SITE PER PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS. 16. PROPERTY SHALL HAVE AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL. SYSTEM SHALL BE WI NTERIZED(BLOWN -OUT) AFTER THE FIRST OPERATIONAL SEASON AND SHALL PROVIDE STARTUP THE FOLLOWING SPRING. IRRIGATION SHALL HAVE TWO-YEAR WARRANTY ON PARTS AND LABOR FOLLOWING INSTALLATION APPROVAL BY OWNER. PROVIDE BACKFLOW DEVICE, WATER METER, BOOSTER PUMP, BLOW-OUT VALVES, CONTROLLER, RAIN SENSOR, WIRES, VALVE BOXES, SLEEVING, VALVES, ROTORS, SPRAYS, AND OTHER ACCESSORIES FOR A COMPLETE SYSTEM. IRRIGATION NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK, SUBMIT LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANTED MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. 3, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FUR PROPER DRAINAGE AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK, IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE PROPER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN PLANTING AREAS. 4. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO USE PROPOSED ON -SITE FUNDS FOR PRIMARY WATER SOURCE FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM, PROVIDE SECONDARY BACKUP POTABLE WATER SOURCE CONNECTION, PLANT LEGEND OV' F' 'ORY DECIDUOUS TREE-70 3" DIA, ORNAMENTAL TREES-28 MIN. 2.0" DIA. 0 SHRUBS-131 MIN. SIZE 24 0 RIVER ROGK SOD FINISH GRADE 5" METAL EDGING UNDISTURBED SOIL FILTER FABRIG ONLY IF USING ROGK MULGH BACKFILLED SOIL/SOIL MIXTURE ROOT BALL NOTES: I. DO NOT USE FILTER FABRIG HITH HOOD MULCHES. 2. BAGKFILL WITH NATIVE 501L UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY LAN PSGAPE ARGHITECT. TYPICAL EDGE OF MULCH DETAIL NOT TO 5GALE = PLANT SCHEDULES SYM COMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE HEIGHT NUMBER A. American Basswood Tilia americana 3" cal 10' 10 B. River Birch Betula nigra 3" cal 10' 20 C. Blackberry Celtis occidentalis 3" cal 10' 9 D. Maple, rubrum'Autumn Spire' Acer rubrum'Autumn Spire' 3" cal 10' 12 E. Oak, Swamp White Quercus bicolor 3" cal 10' 19 F. Spring Snow Crabapple Malus'Spring Snow' 2" cal 8' 6 G. Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulate 2" cal 8' 4 H. Serviceberry Amelanchier arborea 2" cal 8' 8 I. Japanese Maple Acer palmatum 2" cal 8' 4 J. Pagoda Dogwood Corneus alterifolia 2" cal 8' 6 K. Hydrangea, Bobo Hydrangea paniculata'Bobo' #10 24" 24 L. Dogwood, Isanti Cornus sericea'Isanti' #10 36" 24 M.Viburnum, wayfaring'Mohican' Viburnum lantana'Mohican' #10 36" 18 N. Arborvitae, Tech ny Thuja occidentalis'Tech ny' #20 5' 21 O. Juniper, Blue Star Juniperus squamata'Blue Star' #10 24" 16 P. Burning Bush Euonymus alatus #10 24" 19 Q. Sumac, Tiger Eyes Rhus typhina'Tiger Eyes' #10 24" 9 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS I. CITY OF MEDINA'S LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ARE BASED UPON THE LENGTH OF THE PERIMETER OF THE LOT. TOTAL PERIMETER FUR THE PROJECT SITE IS 2,791.18 LF 2. OVERSTORY TREE REQUIREMENT IS 1 PER 50 LF, OF LOT PERIMETER = 56 TREES, 3. ORNAMENTAL TREE REQUIREMENT IS 1 PER 100 L.F. OF LOT PERIMETER = 28 TREES, 4, SHRUB REQUIRMENT IS 1 PER 30 LF. OF LOT PERIMETER - 93 SHRUBS, NOTES: 1. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS, SMOOTH, AND WATER SOIL SURFACE BEFORE LAYING SOD 2. SOD ACROSS SLOPE NOT DOWN SLOPE 3- STAGGER SOD SO SEAMS DO NOT LINE UP TO PREVENT WASHOUTS 4. PLACE SOD WITH SEAMS FLUSH AGAINST EACH OTHER DO NOT LEAVE GAPS BETWEEN ROLLS. 5. STAKE SOD ON SLOPES > 49 6. COMPRESS SOD WITH WEIGHTED ROLLER AND WATER AFTER LAYING IT. 7. SOD DISTURBED AREAS AND OTHER AREAS AS DIRECTED SOD PLAN DETAIL NOT TO 5GALE START SOD AVING i �`fA a ( = TIN. X r LUNSKI INC. 1595 NUNLAP STREET N ST. PAUL, MN 55108 S12 991J 55 K OU W zW = r 0o❑W y 0 U) q U wWQ W❑U a.Z-W N D If Z O❑�l a LU W 2 m¢D FW~W Z Fa~ }W❑ZU O LL Y Z W F. IL ¢ J () - 0 } AULL uj m YKWW UICOWLLH. =wDXr -Of U)(L VIA I•, a U 2 FIA M h r W CI m E U) U E .� O O CI a_ a 0- LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2.0 u� iz c ::3 0 E c m i i RLTAINING WALL -------------- GARAGE FLOOR SCALE 3/32" = V-0" w Z J a LLI H 7b5 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 �(0 AINS� t LUNSKI INC. i M� E E O V m --j ch Lim J � O 4� Cn ca r1- _ 2 c) c; 0 M N 0 00 N fn N cn 73 cN U � U U) U GARAGE FLOOR PLAN AO LC12017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLO - 2 ►i C' 1ST FLOOR SCALE 8/32" = V-0" GROSS BUILDING AREA BY FLOOR LOWER LEVEL 29702 SF 1ST FLOOR 30624 SF 2ND FLOOR 30000 SF 3RD FLOOR 29302 SF TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA 119628 SF UNIT MIX BY TYPE UNITTYPE Name Area 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 653 SF 1 BED 1 BED 653 SF 1 BED 1 BED 736 SF 1 BED 1 BED 735 SF 1 BED 1 BED 658 SF 1 BED 1 BED 590 SF 1 BED 1 BED 662 SF 1 BED 1 BED 735 SF 1 BED 1 BED 740 SF 1 BED 1 BED 741 SF 1 BED 1 BED 740 SF 1 BED 1 BED 653 SF i BED 1 BED 653 SF 1 BED 1 BED 736 SF 1 BED 1 BED 735 SF 1 BED 1 BED 658 SF 1 BED 1 BED 590 SF 1 BED 1 BED 660 SF 1 BED 1 BED 735 SF 1 BED 1 BED 740 SF 1 BED 1 BED 741 SF 1 BED 1 BED 740 SF 1 BED 1 BED 621 SF 1 BED 1 BED 621 SF 1 BED 1 BED 658 SF 1 BED 1 BED 721 SF 1 BED 1 BED 741 SF 1 BED 1 BED 589 SF 1 BED 1 BED 721 SF i BED: 29 19960 SF 1 BED+DEN 1 BED+DEN 1 BED+DEN 825 SF 1 BED+DEN 1 BED+DEN 9D2 SF 1 BED+DEN 1 BED+DEN 825 SF 1 BED+DEN 1 BED +DEN 902 SF 1 BED+DEN 1 BED+DEN 826 SF 1 BED+DEN 1 BED+DEN 826 SF 1 BED +DEN: 5 5106 SF 2 BED+ 1 BATH 2BED +I BATH 2BED -1 BATH 891 SF 2BED +I BATH 2BED -1 BATH 556 SF 2BED +I BATH 2BED -1 BATH 960 SF 2BED +I BATH 2BED -1 BATH 893 SF 2BED +I BATH 2BED -1 BATH 960 SF 2BED +I BATH 2BED -1 BATH 875 SF 2 BED+ 1 BATH: 6 5435 SF 2 BED +2 BATH 2BED +2 BATH 2BED -2 BATH 1016 SF 2BED +2 BATH 2BED -2 BATH 1087 SF 2BED +2 RATH 2BED -2 BATH 11373F 2BED +2 BATH 2BED -2 BATH 1045 SF 2BED +2 BATH 2BED -2 BATH 1016 SF 2BED +2 BATH 2BED -2 BATH 1086 SF 2BED +2 BATH 2BED -2 BATH 1045 SF 2 BED +2 BATH: 7 7433 SF MEMORY CARE ROOM MEMORY CARE ROOM MC-2 423 SF MEMORY CARE ROOM MC-3 346 SF MEMORY CARE ROOM M63 346 SF MEMORY CARE ROOM MC-2 430 SF MEMORY CARE ROOM MC-1 346 SF MEMORY CARE ROOM MGi 346 SF MEMORY CARE ROOM MC-1 346 SF MEMORY CARE ROOM MC-6 589 SF MEMORY CARE ROOM MC-4 327 SF MEMORY CARE ROOM MC-5 359 SF MEMURY OANE ROOM: 10 3656 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT SPECIAL CARE UNIT SC-2 455 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT SC-3 363 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT SC-3 363 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT SC-2 454 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT SC-1 355 SF SPECIAL CARE UNIT: 5 STUDIO 19W SF STUDIO STUDIO 501 SF STUDIO STUDIO 501 SF STUDIO STUDIO 503 SF STUDIO STUDIO SW SF STUDIO STUDIO 524 SF STUDIO STUDIO 545SF STUDIO STUDIO 543 SF STUDIO STUDIO 544 SF STUDIO STUDIO 498 SF STUDIO STUDIO 503 SF STUDIO STUDIO 5D3 SF STUDIO STUDIO 503 SF STUDIO STUDIO 5f31 SF STUDIO STUDIO 545 SF STUDIO STUDIO 544 SF STUDIO STUDIO 497 SF STUDIO STUDIO 462 SF STUDIO STUDIO 482 SF STUDIO STUDIO 1544 SF STUDIO STUDIO 1524 SF STUDIO: 20 10266 SF Grand total: 83 54038 SF W W w Z a. J W 765N H.Awn., MW SI, Pal, Wnea W 14 95IM3,9 a b SAL Ng 2,$ 11 ^, T LUNSICI INC. b M E E O U •� G J � L C O •� QCC� 'W v/) \V NEON ca 5W L n x ro g 0 V N N � . OJ j N y N � d Q d ❑ a a E Q Z U .0 ❑ a` a (L FIRST FLOOR PLAN Al (C ID17 MOMEN MDESIGN GROUP LW u� CL c ::3 0 E c m TRANSFERS DOWN TO 1ST FLOOR - NO ACCESS TO 2ND FLOOR WITHOUT CREDENTIALS 2ND FLOOR SCALE 3/32" = V-0" 300 UU i UU LU H 7b5 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 TA LUNSKI INC. 04 S_��i ■I� E O V � o ch J c� L c O '-0 — a) cf) .I_ 4� N 3 N CD a? cu a✓ � (� L U � U N A E SECOND FLOOR PLAN A►2 1g12017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLC u� CL c ::3 0 E c m THIRD FLOOR SCALE 3/32" = V-0" LU H 7b5 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 TA LUNSKI INC. 04 S_��i ■I� E E O V � o ch J c� L c O '-0 — a) cf) .i_ 4� _ h 47 � j 0 � `J �( Z v ' E THIRD FLOOR FLAN A3 LC12017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLC win ■I• ■1• rip-, mrI■1■■'ll I 11■11■1' II ��'' sJNI ■ ■ NEI EL1im .m — !\1[•l►11111i 1111:12INWEI1[9 �"'" I��IIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!�IIIII!IIIIIII!!IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII ■lii�li�li�i ■■■tail �'� 1■11■I 1il l■I f ��ol 1■11■11■11�1 I� in A 1 [91L1mivlFA101a011ma'aaImytill 1[• ■; =; 1■111 =1■ 1■1 = 1■ M 1■11m1=INS 1■1 1 NEI oloomimom�-*-Im IIIICEFill milli 1C11■I v■1 IIIIII III rOMME! �I I 1 I II 1 IIII IIIIII - i 111 .IIII ,IIIIII _ ,II Ii11��. 11 IIL, ihi9li i ii ill - 1 I ICI milli ICI ICI ICI —ICI ICI ICI • 111 ICI milli III 1■I I■1 ICI Ill Ill II', , ■ ■ , ■ III tlll II111111 • ■ MENOMONEE ■ ■ �I711pl,II �� III II II III!II Pry I�111°L ,Ill�rl�_ �- IlllillllllL III. I�IIIIII�lIII!I � ■ III 1 low �� •� _ � � m� ICI 1Cl ICI 1111C1 M'""�1 IC1'ICI ICI' _ ICI IC 1■11CI Milli IC11■1 Ill #II Ill Al l■l ICI ICI 1i1■��r.�l II�I�®■ vi � GARAGELOWER LEVEL �TIJJDIV •, ®�I I 1■11■1 1� . 1■1 ■1 ..G_ ■ ! IIIIIII� 1�111�II � I IIIIIIII I�llll�l Iilr 1■11�1 1■1 �� 1■1 ■1 ;� —��. lllllll 11pi ■ ■I�iiw ■�w■iw.•i�■i� �H � �■il I. _L■ �iii�� �: --- 1■IIi1 1■C ■;__ 1■1 �1 �- - ■ ■im.� _ii !NEI1■11■1'1■11■ �l' ■�' ICI ICI Mimi 1■11■ l■11■1 1■1 1■11■1 &-.11 �:. ..1■11■ I I' ��� 1l■11■1 1■11■1l1m11■1 1■11■1 1■11■1 I■I ICI ICI ICI ICl W IIIIIII�!I!I'!!I!I!I!I!II!IIIIIIIII !I I °Illluul Ilnllull Ion Mal im � . '� '�� �'I'i11� 'sf �r 11111111i11111Yiill111111�� ■ .■■ �■ �■■■� ■■■■ :■■■ �■—_ ■■■� �� ■■ _��■ .■n—la� ', j 111°Ili II IIII IIII - ICI �■� �■� ICI II�f� IIII �� i■� i' ■,: I ■ ■�'Y ■■■! i■ 1■11111 ��I ICI III IIII■��■- 1M11t1 1 ■■:1N11■1 s! INN INN ' 1■11■1 ■ 1 I■I ICI ICI ICI igloos L1■11■1 1011■1� 1■11■1 .1011m 1■11■I II MEN SKYWAYI■I ICI ICI ICI ICI ICI CONNECTION _ 1 �a� a■nw_ 1 - IINIIIIIIIII Illlllllll l I��. ■il�a�■il�: 'q 11 � III . _ 11�1�®.all.��s��.o ��:■�� �._ �w.�.�■� .I�wa�-r_�.�� .:..�.� ■. 11�I°��. I IIII I I,.II ■ 111 1 :�■11■1 � 1■11■1 Ir'L 1■i ill �11■I l�l r _. I� 1■11■1 I I ICI ICI ICI ICI ICI ICI ICI ■� �� a� ■' ` 111■1 �■_ 1■11■1 101 !■1 �� ;� 1■11■1 �■i-:Ji-■-�- ;�■ 1■11■1 I�1 !■1 Milli L1 I■I I■1 I■I ��� ��■.■��■_. �I _._� �� _ ■ ��� ■ ■ � ■ ■ � � ■ ■ . M_ 1111 :� ■ ■ III■ � ■ ■ ■ � � ��� i a -.. �-. 1.�-J ���■. ��ir�■r—���_-.-.v ■�_r—r�r�- ��—:� _ y�,'',',,,�,y,.,�,,���� - - ,,..�IWIV:._- ..�::_��:�, �i ,�i■fi.� �Y - � my ww�i� ® �■■■1 i � i �..,. I �■■��FIFI• • MON _7 1 1 i ■ L � 1 ■ 1 ,,,,,,,,,II�,� I����111111111111111111,111111111111�������! ,�•,,,NONNI Ill Mi 101 loll 0 Fri I Jil- JENNE ilir �l IIIIII�!�IIIII is "■' ■ i� I r � ■ ■, llr °°� � !il■■■`1�� 3 � r I fl�l°I!i ll IIII I_ I I III �■1•- 1•-!�!�WON ii mill ml Lim, 1111 oil ■pia ■■�I ICI ICI ��-�` ICI ICI i1C11C1 1CI1CI III■, I■■ �I�� ��I I ICI � 'ICI �I�•ICI 11i � �l 1111111 1■1 ■_ Ill I■1 Ill Ml ■ 'lI ■■ . Nil I Nor L 11:—�Il��n'•=�i�•_Iri.�e31��1�=.in MIIi1■ m JIB ICI l■I ■ICI ICI `ICI CIII'� ICI ICI ICI ICI �1C1 Ill 11 ■■MOEME IW low ■ I in I • • 4 Is • ii I i., win win III, IIII IIIIIII ,���ol I im IN � ��:��C� ������ �I ►I� Milli 11111111s Will III oil, ON In I �i����! IIIIIIII I Hil _ 11191►no[f]: IIIIII Ili'�I I■I lii 1■I iil lii 1■I 1■I 1■li■I �I 1■I 1■II■I A l le _r l le lil lil l■I 1■1 I■I 1� 1�1 I■I 1■1 I■I • Iillil � I■1 I■1 I■III IIII■1 � I■1 I■11■I �i Iri Y� ■ Ii11�1 1■1 ■i Milli MIMI IN 1111WO—IN �it 1■I l it ii Irk ��� ��,..' fl�l i�l1 � {■I 1■1 '� � il I■I �1 �il I��I■I I■1 1�;,1'��I�I � � lil 'lil I■I ; iil lil ,� ��`�•� �'' lii Ill I ' -- ..r...a= 1■I I■I I■11■1 I■11■llillil lillill' ■��■� _ 1■11■1 INN INN unm NMI INN INN INN �� W: ��w llilll llilll ii��ri - IIIIIII IIIIIII lull llr..l''� I �. {II�{k�l 71tt IrrNIPI H111111 Illlltlll ll nFii if lrrif nlr ll ll11n14 r�����i I1111i1t1111111 !IIII mill I [■1 I 1111■I 1■1 I■l 1 - �� 1■II 1il111 loll III Ill III III1� Ill iil ■II III .I --- ; , I „ „ , ., .I __ I�1 , ■ ro �I'lll�ltlll! IIIIII !!�Ili�i � ��I!a !!IIII Illl II ICII�I! Ill 1■1 4" n i In 1■1 I I,I lii � F Ii11i 111 i1I iil ! iil iil �n �I iil iil iil iil III w. _s' , „ „ ■' u ■I __ IIII r ■ ■ l'lllHI iil 111 iil 111 -11111 lii 111 IiI I■I �.�� 11111i iil ul'' iil iil` I 1■I iil 1■I 1■I �il ul lii 11{ l■11■I 1■1 iil I lil El III ill, � � I � ■■I, � N■■I -_L_ _ I ■ , ■ � ■ � �; i III �..d `IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIflll4111111 II[IIICI.1:Cllll,lll�l'II �I 111 e'I ! �11- � �� �I /IIII IIfI III �II i11161PllllFlllnlUllllnllM0.1141IYYIl'_IIIdn611Rrrr ,'lllrlul.uln 111 . I'I 'II II i ,I i 1■11-- Ii11■I T�I� II 1■11■11�� ill�llu — 1■11 1■11■_1 -� 11111■p, eillllllllh1", ; ei ■ iII I I!=1�e.�P �f I '/..IIII Illlllli: In III Ia1111111111IIIIIIIYII I., II IIIIIPII IIPIIPI i" A l le 11�7111■'I — I� new+ del _ I MEMO IIIIIII 117111 � Milli i:i iii iil i111l� 11111 HE 101 NMI 1 ii ii � ���� - � loll ii ii . �■ i� I! WF1 I, 0=1, Nil, INN 1111111111V 1111111 Mimi ME 0 0 Ell El Ell NONE �i II INIIIIIIMI I � I IIIINII 111111111 Mill Mill 1■1 1■1 !' �■� ®'�■1 � In'� �� 11 �� ■ I�IIiI 1■ll�l 1■11■1 1■�; 1■1 101 IM �■� NMI I�1 1 ■I 11 11■11 a I' I I I � l i � ii l i .��i 0 0 0 .11 IIIIIIII IIIIIII (IIII IIIIII IIIIII .. / Illllllll (IIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIIII IIII III 11111111111111111 (IIII! Ilillll llil1411. {l{�{I I{Ill till lilll Boll I!III!lliisI III YA1 :II�I7lIi I1111111111111/n///l IIIIIn1111■n f111111 f'.'.I fl ll I1/•"I,II II III lii 111111111111.111IIIIIIIIIII Iti11AI111111 jiIII I 1{ -r11A 11I111f1111rf 1111k If 1/1/1!1/111111111111iif1 4III Ills/1/er IIIIIII/ � / Illlllli Illlllli Ilnlilel�l�lll�fflelfelRIRIIIIrR1MIfl : 'b •��r ���En'�l�ale�r�e��5r 1■11■1 !_ 1■f 1■11■1 1■1 ■ _ _ � �il�llee��lll .'awwommi— 1■1 1■11■1 1■11■1 11111i - - - sn1:Ir.NFe7e: NMI 1■1 ` 1■11 INN IN 1■11■1 INI 1■1 1■11■� 1■11■1 1■11■1 IIII lii +!+ I i ' IIII-1 III llilll I I 'l IIIIIII IIIIII 11111 IIIIIIIIIIIII1llIIIIIIIIIII III I111 IIII I `l �1SlI ....... RunuRRleRllllellleeeeeeR IIII Illllllll llllllll I/1 Ilflflllfep11ee11eie1.elelgellle//feels/nee■leeeeee/e1e111I1e1Fcunlueeneeleleee�llllElli�l��llllllll vemeeeee: �Y -. IIIIIII ee11�_! 1_�f 1 �1 ����1lIF �1� IE � -- I � ��• ■1 1■11■1 1■1 1■11■1 OEMi I� ll� I��f a C� • 4 Gr I 0 - GARAGE LEVEL SCAL 1 /16" = V-0" E GROSS BUILDING AREA BY FLOOR GARAGE LEVEL 14904 SF 1ST FLOOR 14656 SF 2ND FLOOR 10104 SF Grand total GARAGE PARKING 39665 SF GARAGE LEVEL 33 Grand total 33 1 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCAL 1 /16" = V-0" E 2 - 2ND FLOOR SCAL 1 /16" = V-0" E Q J a LL FM 10 Aw C0 0 E E 0 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 952.583.9788 (0 ��iNINSrat C-10- LUNSKI INC. ` y 'h M 0) ■ lillllllll� co .;__j ■ W O 5 - G co W ■ lillllllll� CY) N U o cfl 0o N CA tq Q) Q y.1 m U � i L � � Q Z N E N o a a a FLOOR PLANS A6 9 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLC EXTERIOR FINISH PERCENTAGES MASONRY 11,823 SF 58°k ARCH- WOOD VENEER STUCCO 1,531 SF 8% 2,455 SF 12% GLAZING I OPENINGS 4,445 SF 22% TOTAL 20,254 SF 100% AVERAGE ROOF HEIGHT FROM ADJACENT GRADE: W - 6" =" �_fl 31 S.F. WALL SIGNAG (32 S.F- ALLOWED THI WALL Roof 28' - Oil 2ND FLOOR_ 16' - 0" 1ST FLUOR Q'}" SOUTHWEST DETAIL ELEVATION SCAL 1/8" = V-Q" E -- 31 S.F. WALL SIGNAGE (32 Roof 28' - 0" FLOOR 16'-0" FLOOR ■ O" 1 LEVEL -10' - 0" SOUTHEAST DETAIL ELEVATION SCAL 118" =1'-Q° E COMPOSITE MCTAI DAKICI — STUCCO — MASONRY - (--- NORTHWEST ELEVATION ,,� SCAL 118"' = V-0" -- - E (: )_WEST ELEVATION - FRONT ENTRANCE 3 SCAL 1 /8" = V-0" E MASONRY — — ----- CAST Sl COMPO" PANEL SOUTH ELEVATION - HIGHWAY 55 EXPOSURE SCAL 118" = 1'-0" -- -- E COMPOSITE METAL PANEL — -- MASONRY ALUMINUM - STOREFRONT Cl(VIAIA V rt)KIKICf'TIIi,AI -- WALL SIGNAGE 30 S.F. (372 S.F. WALL AREA) Cl/VWAV PnKIAILPTIMI 'In C C Al I rktAiCr) DCD Q=r TIIIAI Q1r 44 4 k — WALL SIGNAGE 154 S.F. (WALL AREA = 3,073 S.F) 162 S.F. ALLOWED PER. SECTION 815.11.1.b ---- STAIR EGRESS EXIT - ---- SERVICE ACCESS )D VENEER .Roof ■ COMPOSITE PANEL 2ND FLUOR. ■- , 16' - 0" ■ )NT MAIN ENTRY 1 ST FLQQR oil7 GARAGE LEVEL _16' - OII — COMPOSITE METAL PANEL - STUCCO CAST STONE MASONRY ARCHITECTURAL WOOD VENEER 2ND FLOOR. 16'-0" — ALUMINUM WINDOWS — ALUMINUM STOREFRONT MAIN ENTRY 1ST FLOOR COMPOSITE METAL PANEL -- --- — STUCCO � Roof 281 - Oil 2ND FLOOR, 161 - Oil — ALUMINUM WINDOWS LOWER LEVEL GARAGE ACCESS — MASONRY 1ST FLOOR ■ O" ■ GARAGE LEVEL AU, -101-_ 0" 1► T CL C �n a� 0 E c cu E 0 765 North Hampden Avenue, #180 St- Paul, Minnesota 55114 952,583.9788 rA ' LUNSKI INC. ' JLm 0 zs 0 ' co clia w C CN 0 m U E: d U) Z a� U .(D +'' E U W m Q at D ❑ CL CL [L EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SCAL 1 /8" = V-0" E A7 2017 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LA U 2:*.`�1 J 2 11111111 lTl'MMMaS Us DERSPECTIVE SOUTHEAST VIEW FRIC - � — � —.1 " mi'_ - --- La M OR wil IRA ML:'�. . yy + 1! I■i lei 1 Ted M M4 I —MI - I ILIA iPI oil wil �, I.y {e Y ,� � } A � �•�� y'Jyi , J � .r. i � � ■ � 011 m ICI I i■1 N� � Iltl i'�1 IAN � Iili j,Ih�"111 - �IIIII! III = I� III111 Illill ,� i i■i i■1 �I� 101101 1C.11■1'' Ili'i 1■1' 1■11■1 '' 1■'I 1 ■i i■111■1 Im mi I Ir Elm sm � I 1�1 I 41 it; MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: September 13, 2017 MEETING: September 19, 2017 City Council SUBJ: Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition — Final Plat and Development Agreement Review Deadline Complete Application Submitted: August 11, 2017 60-day Review Deadline: October 10, 2017 Summary of Request On May 21, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution 2013-37, granting preliminary plat approval to Toll Brother, Inc. for a single-family development to be known as Reserve of Medina. The subject property is located east of County Road 116 and south of Hackamore. The preliminary plat proposed the subdivision of 126 single family lots and an additional lot to contain HOA recreational facilities. On July 16, 2013, the City adopted Resolution 2013-60, which granted final approval for the first phase of the development to include 51 single family lots and the private recreational lot. The applicant has now requested Final Plat approval for the 2nd addition of the development to include 44 single family lots. Streets and utilities are proposed to be constructed this fall for this phase, along with required tree planting from the initial site development. Much of the grading for this phase was completed along with the lst addition. The subject property is zoned R1, Single Family Residential, and is located east of County Road 116 and north Shawnee Woods Road. The 2nd addition is located in the southeast corner of the development. Future phases will extend north to Hackamore Road, but until that time, the additional 44 lots within the 2nd addition are proposed to access County Road 116 via Aster Road. Final Plat Consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan, zoning and subdivision regulations, and other relevant policies was reviewed during review of the Preliminary Plat. The purpose of a final plat review is to ensure that the final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat and to ensure that all the conditions of approval have been met. The Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition plat includes 44 lots, an outlot which will be dedicated to the City for access to the City -owned wooded area in the southeast corner of the site, and an outlot which will contain the future phase(s) of the development. Reserve of Medina 2"" Addn Page 1 of 5 September 19, 2017 Final Plat City Council Meeting Consistency with Preliminary Plat The proposed final plat is substantially similar to the approved preliminary plat, with the exception that 31 of the future lots are contained within Outlot B, which is intended for future development. Preliminary Plat Conditions Several conditions were applied to the preliminary plat approval for Reserve of Medina. The following section reviews compliance with these conditions. 1) Approval of this preliminary plat shall be contingent upon the adoption of an ordinance rezoning the property to R1 - Single Family Residential. The Council adopted Ordinance 549 on May 21, 2013, which rezoned the property. 2) The Developer shall enter into a development agreement satisfactory to the City which shall include the requirements described below as well as other relevant requirements of City ordinance or policy. The Developer entered into a Development Agreement related to the 1 sr Addition. A draft of the development agreement for the 2nd Addition is attached for review and approval of the City Council. Staff recommends that this requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution. 3) Prior to final plat approval, the Developer shall provide detailed construction plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. The applicant has submitted construction plans for the 2nd addition. The City Engineer has reviewed and recommended various changes. Staff recommends that a requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution and in the development agreement that the applicant update the plans as directed by the City Engineer. 4) The Developer shall install all improvements shown on the plans received by the City on April 5, 2013 and any additional improvements required herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. The applicant has submitted construction plans for the 2nd addition. The City Engineer has reviewed and recommended various changes. Staff recommends that a requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution and in the development agreement that the applicant update the plans as directed by the City Engineer. 5) The Developer shall provide a letter of credit prior to any site construction in an amount recommended by the City Engineer to ensure completion of the required improvements. Staff recommends that this requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution and in the development agreement. 6) The Developer shall construct improvements for County Road 116 and shall be responsible for the portion of the cost of future improvements to Hackamore Road as recommended by the City Engineer or as otherwise required by the City. This requirement was included in the initial development agreement and the draft for the 2nd addition. The applicant submitted a letter of credit in the amount of $297,445.28 to Reserve of Medina 2nd Addn Page 2 of 5 September 19, 2017 Final Plat City Council Meeting ensure completion at the time of the first addition approval. Staff recommends that the requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution and in the development agreement to submit a letter of credit in a proportion of the cost equal to 44 lots of the total 126. 7) The Developer shall dedicate right-of-way for County Road 116 along the western boundary of the Property as recommended by the City Engineer. Right-of-way has been dedicated as recommended by the City Engineer. 8) The Developer shall provide additional information requested by the City Engineer to confirm that flood storage of the large wetland to the northwest is not significantly reduced. The applicant has submitted information requested by the City Engineer to confirm that the 0.02%flood storage will not be impacted 9) The Developer shall meet park dedication requirements as follows: a. The Developer shall update plans to provide improved access to Outlot D. Either a 40 foot wide trail easement shall be dedicated or a 20-foot wide outlot shall be deeded. b. The Developer shall also dedicate a 10-foot wide trail easement along Hackamore Road. c. The Developer shall pay a park dedication fee of $604,672.75 in -lieu of dedication of additional land. The applicant has proposed to deed Outlot A, Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition, to the City in order to access Outlot D, Reserve of Medina (wooded area in southeast corner). The applicant paid the $604, 672.75 park dedication fee at the time of first addition. Staff recommends a condition requiring the Hackamore Trail easement along with 2nd Addition approval. 10) The grading plan shall be updated so that Outlot C is adequate for use as an open play area maintained by the HOA. The developer graded Outlot C in connection with the 1 St Addition improvements. 11) The City agrees to accept deeding of Outlot D for public ownership and maintenance as proposed by the Developer. Such conveyance is not being required by the City pursuant to park dedication requirements. The developer deeded Outlot D to the City at the time of recording 1st Addition. 12) No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water system. The Developer shall provide details of alternative irrigation measures prior to final plat approval. Staff recommends that this requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution and in the development agreement. 13) The Developer shall be responsible for the cost of improvements to the existing lift station necessary to serve the proposed development. This requirement was paid at the time of 1 st Addition. Reserve of Medina 2"" Addn Page 3 of 5 September 19, 2017 Final Plat City Council Meeting 14) If the City secures easements for the installation of a sewer main along the "future sewer alignment" shown in the plans, the Developer shall install this line as opposed to the line along County Road 116. The City obtained necessary easements and the sewer was installed during construction of P addition. 15) One side of streets shall be posted "No Parking" to allow adequate emergency vehicle circulation. Staff recommends that this requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution and in the development agreement. 16) The street alignment of the north end of the development shall be reviewed when this portion of the site is final platted to look for opportunities to line up intersections with existing road(s) to the north, to improve circulation, and to reduce wetland and tree impacts. Staff recommends that this requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution. 17) Street names shall be updated as recommended by City staff for review by the City Council at the time of final plat. Street names were updated as recommended. 18) A system for the discharge of sump pump water shall be installed, the design of which shall be approved by the Public Works Director. Staff recommends that this requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution. 19) All driveways shall be allowed to be set back a minimum of five feet from one of the side property lines, provided the driveway extends from a side -load garage, is set back a minimum of 10 feet from the other side property line and is consistent with width regulations. City regulations have been updated so that the required setback has been reduced to 5- feet. This waiver is no longer necessary. 20) All comments of the City Engineer dated March 28, 2013 shall be addressed, and construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. The applicant has submitted construction plans for 2nd Addition. The City Engineer has reviewed and recommended various changes. Staff recommends that a requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution and in the development agreement that the applicant update the plans as directed by the City Engineer. 21) All comments of the City Attorney shall be addressed, and the Developer shall abide by the City Attorney's recommendations related to title issues and recording procedures. Staff recommends that this requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution and in the development agreement. 22) The Developer shall obtain Wetland Replacement Plan approval prior to final plat approval. The City Council approved of the Wetland Replacement Plan on April 16, 2013. Reserve of Medina 2nd Addn Page 4 of 5 September 19, 2017 Final Plat City Council Meeting 23) The Developer shall record Homeowner's Association (the "HOA") documents against all residential lots which shall be satisfactory to the City. This document shall, among other things, describe responsibilities for maintenance of stormwater improvements, HOA recreational improvements, buffer yards, upland buffers, lawn irrigation systems. The developer submitted HOA docs in connection with 1 St Addition. 24) The Developer shall obtain necessary approvals and permits from the Elm Creek Watershed, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Health and other relevant agencies. Staff recommends that this requirement be included on the Final Plat resolution and in the development agreement. 25) The application for final plat shall be submitted to the City within 180 days of preliminary approval or the preliminary plat shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Developer and approved by the City Council prior to such time. Such application for final plat shall include all of the property included within the approved preliminary plat. The I st Addition final plat was submitted within the timeframe required. 26) The Developer shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, general plan of development, construction plans, development agreements, and other relevant documents. The applicant has been paying invoices promptly. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1) Motion to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition. 2) Motion to approve the Development Agreement by and between the City of Medina and Toll MN LP Attachments 1. Resolution granting final plat approval for Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition. 2. Development Agreement by and between the City of Medina and Toll MN LP 3. City Engineer Comments dated 8/31/2017 4. Final Plat of Reserve of Medina received by the City on 8/25/2017 5. Construction plans for Reserve of Medina received by the City on 8/8/2017 Reserve of Medina 2"" Addn Page 5 of 5 September 19, 2017 Final Plat City Council Meeting Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 20174# RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR RESERVE OF MEDINA 2" ADDITION WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2013, the City granted preliminary approval to Toll MN, L.P. (the "Developer") for subdivision called Reserve of Medina to include 126 single-family residential lots, an additional lot to contain private recreational facilities and a number of outlots; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013, the City granted final plat approval to the Developer for the Reserve of Medina, which was intended to be developed in a number of phases; and WHEREAS, the Reserve of Medina plat included 52 lots and a number of outlots, including Outlot C, Reserve of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Property"), which was intended to be replatted into additional residential lots in future phases consistent with the approved preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested final plat approval for Reserve of Medina 2"d Addition, which is the second phase of the project and is proposed to replat the Property into 44 single-family residential lots and two outlots; and WHEREAS, one of the outlots within the Reserve of Medina 2"d Addition plat is intended to be replatted in future phase(s); and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed plat at the September 19, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that, subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, the final plat is substantially consistent with the approved preliminary plat and the requirements of the City's subdivision regulations and other relevant policies. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants final plat approval for the Reserve of Medina 2"d Addition subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) The Developer shall enter into a development agreement satisfactory to the City which shall include the requirements described below as well as other relevant requirements of City ordinance or policy. Resolution No. 20174# September 19, 2017 2) The Developer shall install all improvements shown on the plans received by the City on August 8, 2017, except as modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. 3) The Developer shall provide a letter of credit prior to any site construction in an amount recommended by the City Engineer to ensure completion of the required improvements. 4) The Developer shall be responsible for the portion of the cost of future improvements to Hackamore Road as recommended by the City Engineer or as otherwise required by the City. 5) The Developer shall dedicate a 10-foot wide trail easement along Hackamore Road. 6) No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water system. 7) The Developer shall abide by the requirements of the Wetland Protection ordinance, including dedication required easements, planting appropriate vegetation, and installing signage. 8) The Developer shall install tree replacement and landscaping as shown on the landscaping plan dated April 4, 2013. 9) One side of streets shall be posted "No Parking" to allow adequate emergency vehicle circulation. Plans shall be updated to identify sign locations. 10) The street alignment within Outlot B, Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition, shall be reviewed when this portion of the site is replatted to look for opportunities to line up intersections with existing road(s) to the north, to improve circulation, and to reduce wetland and tree impacts. 11) A system for the discharge of sump pump water shall be installed, the design of which shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 12) All comments of the City Engineer dated August 31, 2017 shall be addressed, and construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. 13) All comments of the City Attorney shall be addressed, and the Developer shall abide by the City Attorney's recommendations related to title issues and recording procedures. 14) The Developer shall record Homeowner's Association (the "HOA") documents against all residential lots which shall be satisfactory to the City. This document shall, among other things, describe responsibilities for maintenance of stormwater improvements, HOA recreational improvements, buffer yards, upland buffers and lawn irrigation systems. 15) The Developer shall obtain necessary approvals and permits from the Elm Creek Watershed, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Health and other relevant agencies. 16) The plat shall be recorded with Hennepin County within 180 days of adoption of this resolution or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Developer and approved by the City Council prior to such time. 17) The Developer shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the plat, construction plans, development agreements, and other relevant documents. Resolution No. 2017-## 2 September 19, 2017 Dated: September 19, 2017. Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk LO Bob Mitchell, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof - and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017-## September 19, 2017 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Outlot C, Reserve of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Resolution No. 2017-## September 19, 2017 DRAFT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MEDINA AND TOLL MN, L.P. FOR RESERVE OF MEDINA SECOND ADDITION This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 (RHB) 5068790 RHB ME230-664 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Right to Proceed................................................................................................................1 2. Plans; Improvements; Subdivision Density......................................................................2 3. Erosion Control.................................................................................................................3 4. Site Grading; Haul Routes................................................................................................4 5. Construction of Subdivision Improvements.....................................................................4 6. Streets................................................................................................................................5 7. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements.........................................................................7 8. Stormwater Improvements................................................................................................7 9. Landscaping Plan and Irrigation.......................................................................................8 10. Street Lighting and Signs..................................................................................................8 11. Letter of Credit..................................................................................................................9 12. Homeowners' Association..............................................................................................10 13. Wetlands; Upland Buffer Easement Agreement.............................................................10 14. City Trunk Connection Rates; SAC Fees.......................................................................10 15. Park Dedication Requirements; Outlot A.......................................................................10 16. Tree Replacement...........................................................................................................11 17. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection.......................................11 18. Developer's Default........................................................................................................11 19. Insurance.........................................................................................................................12 20. Floodplain Regulations...................................................................................................12 21. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy...........................................12 22. Clean up and Dust Control..............................................................................................13 23. Model Homes..................................................................................................................13 24. Compliance with Laws...................................................................................................13 25. Agreement Runs With the Land.....................................................................................13 26. Indemnification...............................................................................................................13 27. Assignment.....................................................................................................................13 28. Notices............................................................................................................................14 29. Severability.....................................................................................................................14 30. Non-waiver.....................................................................................................................14 31. Counterparts....................................................................................................................15 SIGNATURES.............................................................................................................................. 16-17 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY EXHIBIT B LIST OF PLAN DOCUMENTS EXHIBIT C FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT D SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE EXHIBIT E FORM OF WARRANTY DEED EXHIBIT F FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT G FORM OF TRAIL EASEMENT 5068790 RHB ME230-664 i This Development Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 2017 by and between the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the "City"), and Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, is the fee owner of the real property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2013, the City granted preliminary approval of the plat of Reserve of Medina and rezoned the land within that plat, including the Property, from RR-UR, Rural Residential -Urban Reserve to R1, Single Family Residential; and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested final approval of the second phase of Reserve of Medina which will include 44 lots and two outlots as Reserve of Medina Second Addition (the "Subdivision"); and WHEREAS, the approval of the final plat of Reserve of Medina Second Addition is contingent upon the Developer entering into a development agreement satisfactory to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the mutual covenants and obligations contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Right to Proceed. The Subdivision is the second phase of Reserve of Medina and consists of 44 lots intended for single family residential purposes and two outlots. The Developer may not construct public or private improvements or any buildings within the Subdivision until all the following conditions precedent have been satisfied: a) the final plat of Reserve of Medina Second Addition has been filed with Hennepin County; b) this Agreement has been executed by the Developer and the City; c) the required Letter of Credit (as hereinafter defined) has been received by the City from or on behalf of the Developer; d) final engineering and construction plans in digital form have been submitted by the Developer and approved by the city engineer; e) the Developer has reimbursed the City for all legal, engineering and administrative expenses incurred to date by the City regarding the Subdivision and has given the City the additional escrow required by this Agreement; f) the Developer has executed the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C; g) the Developer has executed the Upland Buffer Easement Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F; 5068790 RHB ME230-664 h) the Developer has executed the Trail Easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G; i) the Developer has submitted the storm sewer improvement tax district and landscape or irrigation system disclosure statements required by sections 8 and 9, respectively, of this Agreement; j) the Developer has submitted an approved wetlands replacement plan; k) Outlot A has been conveyed to the City in accordance with this Agreement; 1) the Developer has submitted and the City has approved the certified grading plan; m) all erosion control measures are in place; n) the Developer has received all required permits from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Metropolitan Council and any other entity having jurisdiction; o) the Developer or the Developer's engineer has initiated and attended a preconstruction meeting with the city engineer and staff; and p) the City has issued a notice that all conditions precedent have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 2. Plans, Improvements; Subdivision Density. a) The Developer agrees to develop the Subdivision in accordance with the final plat of Reserve of Medina Second Addition and the terms and conditions of City resolution 2017- approving said final plat (the "Resolution"), which Resolution is hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement and made a part hereof, and to construct all required improvements within and adjacent to the Subdivision in accordance with the approved engineering and construction plans (collectively, the "Plans"). In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Resolution and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. The documents which constitute the Plans are those on file with and approved by the City and are listed on Exhibit B attached hereto. The Plans may not be modified by the Developer without the prior written approval of the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City staff may approve minor changes to the Plans. b) In developing the Subdivision in accordance with the Plans, the Developer shall make or install at its sole expense the following public and private improvements (collectively, the "Subdivision Improvements"): 1. site grading; 2. streets; 3. sanitary sewer; 4. municipal water distribution system; 5. stormwater facilities; 6. tree replacement; 7. landscape irrigation system; and 8. street lighting, signage, and boulevard landscaping. 5068790 RHB ME230-664 2 Portions of the Subdivision Improvements were made within the initial phase of the development while others are on areas being final platted in Second Addition or in one or more later phases. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Developer reserves the right to not install the landscape irrigation system. c) All work performed by or on behalf of the Developer on or related to the Subdivision, including construction of the Subdivision Improvements and construction of houses on the lots, shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. d) The City acknowledges that the Subdivision consists of the second phase of the Reserve of Medina development which will ultimately include 126 lots for dwellings plus an additional lot for recreational purposes. As provided in Minn. Stat. §462.358 subd. 3(c), the City agreed that for a period of five years from August 1, 2013 no amendment to a comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout, or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approved preliminary plat of Reserve of Medina unless required by State or Federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. 3. Erosion Control. a) All construction regarding the Subdivision Improvements shall be conducted in a manner designed to control erosion and in compliance with all City ordinances and other requirements, including the City's most recent permit with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding municipal separate storm sewer system program. Before any portion of the Property or adjacent area is rough graded, an erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer as approved by the City. The City may impose reasonable, additional erosion control requirements after the City's initial approval, if the City deems such necessary due to a change in conditions. All areas disturbed by the excavation shall be reseeded promptly after the completion of the work in that area unless construction of streets or utilities, buildings or other improvements is anticipated immediately thereafter. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. b) If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems reasonably appropriate to control erosion based on the urgency of the situation. The City agrees to provide reasonable notice to the Developer in advance of any proposed action, including notice by telephone or email in the case of emergencies, but limited notice by the City when conditions so require will not affect the Developer's obligations or the City's rights hereunder. c) The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all expenses it incurs in connection with any action it takes to control erosion. No grading or construction of the Subdivision Improvements will be allowed and no building permits will be issued within the Subdivision unless the Developer is in full compliance with Developer's responsibilities to comply with the erosion control requirements provided herein. The erosion control measures 5068790 RHB ME230-664 3 specified in the Plans or otherwise required within the Property or adjacent areas shall be binding on the Developer and its successors and assigns. 4. Site Grading; Haul Routes. a) In order to construct the Subdivision Improvements and otherwise prepare the land for development, it will be necessary for the Developer to grade the Property. All site and other grading must be done in compliance with the Plans and with all requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding contaminated soils. The City may withhold issuance of a building permit for any structure within the Subdivision until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City. Within 30 days after completion of the grading, or such other period acceptable to the City's engineer, the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan and a certification by a registered land surveyor or engineer. b) The Developer agrees that any fill material which must be brought to or removed from the Property or adjacent areas while grading or during construction of the Subdivision Improvements or any buildings within the Subdivision will be transported using the haul route established by the City. The City designates Co. Rd. 116 to T.H. 55 as the haul route. 5. Construction of Subdivision Improvements. a) All Subdivision Improvements shall be installed in accordance with the Plans, this Agreement, the City's subdivision regulations, the City's engineering standards (as hereinafter defined) for utility construction and the requirements of the report from the City engineer dated August 31, 2017. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications for the Subdivision Improvements prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Developer shall obtain any necessary permits from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission and any other agency having jurisdiction over the Subdivision before proceeding with construction. The Developer shall also comply with the requirements of the letter from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission dated June 27, 2013. The City shall inspect all work at the Developer's expense. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. Prior to beginning construction, the Developer or the Developer's engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with all parties concerned, including the City staff and engineers, to review the program for the construction work. b) Within 45 days after the completion of the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" plans and three complete sets of paper "as constructed" plans, each prepared in accordance with City standards and in AutoCAD format based on Hennepin County coordinates. Sanitary sewer, water and stormwater "as constructed" plans shall also be submitted to the City in GIS format compatible with ArcMap 10.3 in the coordinates and with the attributes directed by the City engineer. Iron monuments must be installed in the Subdivision in accordance with state law. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. Except as specifically noted otherwise in this Agreement, all Subdivision Improvements required by this Agreement shall be completed by no later than July 31, 2019, or within 18 months of the start of construction, whichever occurs first. 5068790 RHB ME230-664 4 c) The Developer agrees to require its contractor to provide to the City a warranty bond for the Subdivision Improvements described in paragraph 2(b) items 2, 3 and 4, with each bond to cover defects in labor and materials for the applicable Subdivision Improvements for a period of two years from the date of their acceptance by the City. During such period, the Developer agrees to repair or replace any Subdivision Improvement, or portion or element thereof, which shows signs of failure, normal wear and tear excepted. A decision regarding whether a Subdivision Improvement shows signs of failure shall be made by the City in the reasonable exercise of its judgment. If the Developer fails to repair or replace a defective Subdivision Improvement during the warranty period after prior written notice to the Developer and opportunity to cure as provided in paragraph 18, the City may repair or replace the defective portion and may use the Letter of Credit, as hereinafter defined, to reimburse itself for such costs. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City fully for the cost of all Subdivision Improvement repairs or replacement if the cost thereof exceeds the remaining amount of the Letter of Credit. Such reimbursement must be made within 45 days of the date upon which the City notifies the Developer of the cost due under this section. If the Developer fails to make required payments to the City, the Developer hereby consents to the City levying special assessments for any unreimbursed amount associated with such costs against the lots within the Subdivision except those which have been sold to homeowners. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges the benefit to the lots within the Subdivision of the repair or replacement of the Subdivision Improvements and hereby consents to such assessment and waives the right to a hearing or notice of hearing or any appeal thereon under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. d) No building permit shall be issued for structures within the Subdivision until adequate street access and sanitary sewer and water are available to the lot in question. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of all Subdivision Improvements serving any lot, the final wear course of bituminous excepted, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of the Subdivision Improvements and damage to the Subdivision Improvements caused by the City, the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No temporary or permanent certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any structure within the Subdivision until all streets, except for the final wear course of bituminous, and all utilities have been completed for the Subdivision. 6. Streets. a) The Developer agrees to construct the streets within the Subdivision in accordance with City specifications and the Plans. The City's street specifications for the streets to be constructed within the Subdivision are contained in the most recent edition of its engineering standards (the "Engineering Standards"), which is hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference. If there is a conflict between the Plans and the Engineering Standards, the Engineering Standards shall prevail except when an alternative has been explicitly approved in writing by the City. b) Following completion of the Subdivision streets and inspection thereof by the city engineer, the City agrees to accept the streets for maintenance if they have been constructed according to City specifications, including the Engineering Standards and the Plans. Removal of 5068790 RHB ME230-664 5 snow and ice from within the Subdivision streets shall remain the responsibility of the Developer until the City accepts the streets for maintenance. c) The streets shall be completed by no later than the date for completion of all Subdivision Improvements except that the final wear course of bituminous on the streets in the Subdivision shall not be completed until after 80 percent of the homes in the Subdivision have been completed. Notwithstanding the above, the City reserves the right to require installation of the wear course regardless of the number of homes completed whenever, at its sole discretion, it deems that to be in the public interest. The Developer shall also repair or replace all broken or failing curbs and sidewalks at the time of installation of the final wear course of bituminous within the Subdivision. d) In order to allow the Developer to grade and to construct the streets within the Subdivision and the extension of sanitary sewer and water improvements, the City hereby agrees to grant to the Developer a temporary easement for purposes of street and utility installation over, under and across the Subdivision rights -of -way. The temporary easement will commence upon filing of the plat of Reserve of Medina Second Addition with Hennepin County and shall terminate upon completion and acceptance by the City of the work described herein regarding road and utility construction to serve the Subdivision. e) The City has conducted a traffic study regarding necessary improvements to the public roadways serving the Subdivision and nearby lands in both Medina and Corcoran and has determined that it will be necessary in the future to construct improvements to Hackamore Road. The conceptual layout of the future improvements to Hackamore Road were shown on Exhibit H to the development agreement between the Developer and the City regarding the original phase of the project. The City intends that Medina's share of the cost of constructing the Hackamore Road improvements will be borne by the developers of those properties which contribute to the need for the improvements and are benefited by them either by requiring the developers to construct the portion of the improvements adjacent to their property or by contributing a proportionate share of the improvement cost to the City. The Letter of Credit (as hereinafter defined) the Developer is required to submit to the City pursuant to section I 1 of this Agreement includes $ , which represents 44/126ths of the estimated cost of the Developer's share of the Hackamore Road improvements and is in addition to the amount attributable to the original phase of the development. This amount is included in the maximum risk exposure regarding the Subdivision Improvements calculated by the City in determining the amount of the Letter of Credit but only at 100 percent of the estimated cost of said improvements. It is anticipated that the portion of the Letter of Credit attributable to the Hackamore Road improvements required by this Agreement will be increased with future phases of the development in the same proportion as the number of lots in future phases bear to 126. Although no improvements to Hackamore Road will be required in this Agreement, the Developer understands that it will be required to construct or contribute to the cost of construction of such improvements when they are agreed to by Medina and Corcoran or required by Medina but in any event no later than the time the Developer develops the northeastern portion of the Property and provides for an access from the development to Hackamore Road. If the Developer has completed all elements of the Subdivision Improvements in this and all future phases of the development and the City is prepared to release the Letter of Credit under the terms specified in 5068790 RHB ME230-664 section 11 of this Agreement prior to construction of the Hackamore Road improvements, the City agrees to accept cash from the Developer in an amount equal to the amount of the total Letter of Credit attributable to the Hackamore Road improvements in satisfaction of this requirement. 7. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements. The Developer agrees to construct sanitary sewer and water lines to serve the lots within the Subdivision. The Developer's work in constructing the utilities must be in accordance with the Plans and must comply with all City requirements regarding such utilities. The sanitary sewer and water Subdivision Improvements will be dedicated by the Developer to the City as public improvements upon completion and acceptance by the City. 8. Stormwater Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to construct the stormwater facilities in accordance with the Plans and in compliance with all City requirements regarding such improvements. The stormwater facilities include but are not limited to the ponds, pipes and the improvements intended for the discharge of water from footing drain tiles and sump pumps so as not to adversely affect adjacent landowners, all as shown on the Plans. b) The stormwater facilities serving the Subdivision will remain private and will be maintained by the Developer at its sole expense until taken over by the HOA, as hereinafter defined. The City does not intend to accept the stormwater facilities as public and does not intend to maintain them. In order to meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission and City code, the Developer agrees to enter into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with the City in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. The purpose of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement is to ensure that the Developer maintains the stormwater facilities until taken over by the HOA and to give the City the right but not the obligation to do so if the Developer fails in its obligations. The Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be recorded against all land within the Subdivision and will run with the land. It supplements and does not replace the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement recorded at the time of approval of the initial phase of the Reserve of Medina The Developer acknowledges that i) the stormwater facilities have not and will not be accepted by the City; ii) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and that the Developer and ultimately the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work; iii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the Developer or HOA to do so; and iv) if the City performs any work on the stormwater facilities after reasonable notice to the Developer or HOA and the failure of the Developer or HOA to perform the work, the City intends to specially assess the cost of such work against the lots within the Subdivision and other portions of the Property. Notwithstanding the above, the City will accept and maintain those elements of the stormwater facilities which are located on public rights -of -way. c) The Developer has made the HOA responsible for the maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities as needed. The HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair or replacement of all stormwater facilities serving any portion of the Reserve of Medina regardless of whether located in the first or future phases of the project. The Developer agrees to inform purchasers of lots within the Subdivision that i) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and 5068790 RHB ME230-664 7 that the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work; ii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the HOA to do so; and iii) if the City performs any work on the stormwater facilities after reasonable notice to the Developer or HOA and the failure of the Developer or HOA to perform the work, the City intends to recover the cost of such work against the lots within the Subdivision. Notwithstanding the above, the City will accept and maintain those elements of the stormwater facilities which are located on public rights -of -way. d) The City has established a storm sewer improvement tax district which includes all land within the Reserve of Medina, including the Subdivision. The district was established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 and authorizes the City to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain, and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related improvements within or serving the Subdivision if such work becomes necessary in the opinion of the City. In recognition of this possibility, the Developer agrees to provide prospective lot purchasers with a disclosure statement informing them of the existence of the storm sewer improvement tax district and that a tax could be imposed on the lots within the Subdivision if the City is required to repair or maintain the storm sewer systems and related improvements. The wording of the disclosure statement must be approved by the City for use in connection with the sale of lots in the Subdivision prior to its distribution or use by the Developer. 9. Landscaping Plan and Irrigation. The Developer agrees to install landscaping in accordance with the Plans. All landscaping shall include hardy, non-invasive and drought tolerant species appropriate for Minnesota. All landscaping materials shall be maintained and replaced if they die within two years after acceptance by the City. The landscape irrigation system utilized within the Subdivision shall be operated in accordance with the Stormwater Management Plans and is subject to the City's irrigation ordinance and water conservation ordinance. Water may be utilized from the public water system for such limited period of time as the City may permit until the landscaping material has been established. After establishment of the landscaping, the public water system may not be used for irrigation. The Subdivision irrigation system shall utilize the stormwater ponds in the Subdivision as the sole water source for all irrigation of lawns and landscaping after establishment of the landscaping. The Developer or the HOA shall meter the amount of water utilized in the irrigation system with a meter approved by the City. The Developer or the HOA may construct a private well within the Subdivision if permitted by the Minnesota Department of Health to supplement the water in the stormwater ponds. If a private well is constructed, the Developer agrees to allow the City access to the well and to provide the City with all geological and well log information obtained when drilling. Pumping records must also be maintained and provided to the City annually. 10. Street Lightingand nd Signs. The Developer agrees to install street lighting and street signs within the Subdivision. The Developer shall pay for the cost of the street lighting and street signs. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Developer shall submit lighting details to the City for review and approval by city staff. All lighting shall meet City standards. Street lighting shall include lighting fixtures approved by the City and shall be equipped with luminaries which allow no light more than five percent above the horizontal plane. If the Developer installs street lighting fixtures consistent with the City's standard fixtures, the City will maintain the fixtures thereafter but the Developer or HOA will be required to maintain all 5068790 RHB ME230-664 g other types of fixtures. Street signs shall be of a design approved by the City and shall be dedicated by the Developer to the City after installation and acceptance by the City. Street signs requiring repair or replacement will be replaced by the City with the City's standard form of street sign. The Developer or the HOA will be required to pay for repair or replacement if any other type of street sign is desired. 11. Letter of Credit. a) In order to ensure completion of the Subdivision Improvements required under this Agreement and satisfaction of all fees due to the City, the Developer agrees to deliver to the City prior to beginning any construction or work within the Subdivision, a letter of credit (the "Letter of Credit") in the amount of $ which represents 150 percent of the estimated cost of the Subdivision Improvements as specified in the Plans. This amount represents the maximum risk exposure for the City, based on the anticipated sequence of construction and the estimate of cost of each element of the Subdivision Improvements, rather than the aggregate cost of all required Subdivision Improvements. The Letter of Credit shall be delivered to the City prior to beginning any work on the Subdivision Improvements and shall renew automatically thereafter until released by the City. The estimated cost of the work covered by the Letter of Credit is itemized on Exhibit D attached hereto. The Letter of Credit shall be issued by a bank determined by the City to be solvent and creditworthy and shall be in a form acceptable to the City. The Letter of Credit shall allow the City to draw upon the instrument, in whole or part, in order to complete construction of any or all of the Subdivision Improvements and other specified work within the Subdivision and to pay any fees or costs due to the City by the Developer after written notice to Developer and Developer's failure to cure the default within a reasonable period. b) The City will retain the entire Letter of Credit until utility testing and the bituminous base course for the streets within the Subdivision are complete. Within thirty days thereafter, the City shall reduce the Letter of Credit to an amount roughly equal to 150 percent of the cost of the remaining work, subject to delivery of the required warranty bond to the City and satisfaction of all of the Developer's financial obligations to the City. Thereafter, at any time and from time to time following completion by Developer and acceptance by City of any portion of the remaining work, Developer may request a further reduction, and the City shall grant such further reduction, of the Letter of Credit, to an amount equal to 150 percent of the then remaining work. The Letter of Credit shall be released in full and returned to the Developer within 30 days of the following: installation of the final wear course of bituminous on the streets; expiration of the two-year warranty period for the landscaping; satisfaction of all financial obligations by the Developer to the City; and completion of all other requirements of this section. Prior to releasing any portion of the Letter of Credit or accepting another letter of credit in replacement, the City shall first be satisfied that all work has been completed according to the Plans and that the Developer has taken such steps as may be necessary to ensure that no liens will attach to the Subdivision. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Letter of Credit shall not be released or reduced to less than that portion attributed to the estimated cost of the Hackamore Road improvement work until such work has been completed or the Developer has given the City a cash equivalent as provided for in section 6 e) of this Agreement. c) It is the intention of the parties that the City at all times have available to it a Letter of Credit in an amount adequate to ensure completion of all elements of the Subdivision 5068790 RHB ME230-664 9 Improvements and other obligations of the Developer under this Agreement. To that end and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all requests by the Developer for a reduction or release of the Letter of Credit shall be evaluated by the City in light of that principle. d) If at any time the City reasonably determines that the bank issuing the Letter of Credit no longer satisfies the City's requirements regarding solvency and creditworthiness, the City shall notify the Developer and the Developer shall provide to the City within 30 days a substitute Letter of Credit from another bank meeting the City's requirements. If within 30 days of notice the Developer fails to provide the City with a substitute Letter of Credit from an issuing bank satisfactory to the City, the City may draw under the existing Letter of Credit. 12. Homeowners' Association. The Developer has established a homeowners' association (the "HOA"), which includes all land within the original phase of the Reserve of Medina as the active development area and portions of the land intended for development in a future phase as the future development area. The Developer agrees to incorporate the Subdivision into the active development area and apply the recorded covenants against the lots within the Subdivision. 13. Wetlands; Upland Buffer Easement Agreement. a) The Developer has purchased wetland credits to mitigate the loss of wetlands within the Subdivision and must meet the requirements of the approved wetland replacement plan. b) The Developer agrees to execute the Upland Buffer Easement Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F. The purpose of the Upland Buffer Easement Agreement is to enhance water quality in the wetlands, provide that no structures or fill are placed in those areas and ensure that they are maintained in such condition thereafter. The Developer agrees to make the HOA responsible for its maintenance obligations under the Upland Buffer Easement Agreement and the HOA documents recorded with Hennepin County will so require. 14. City Trunk Connection Rates; SAC Fees. a) In accordance with City policy and to distribute uniformly the costs of public utility infrastructure improvements, the City will charge the Developer trunk connection fees for the availability of sanitary sewer and water to the Property. The trunk connection fees for sanitary sewer and water shall be payable at the time of issuance of each building permit at the then -current rates. The rates are typically adjusted annually by the City. b) The Metropolitan Council charges the City a sewer availability charge for each new connection to the metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system or increase in capacity demand, payable at the time of issuance of the building permit. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for any sewer availability charge paid by the City to the Metropolitan Council at the then -current rate. The Metropolitan Council's current rate is $2,485 per unit. 15. Park Dedication Requirements; Outlot A. a) In order to satisfy the park dedication requirements for the entire development, the Developer previously agreed to dedicate to the City an easement 10 feet in width along Hackamore Road for use as a trail and to pay the City a park dedication fee in the amount of $604,672.75. The Developer has paid the cash in lieu fee in full and 5068790 RHB ME230-664 10 agrees to grant the trail easement along Hackamore by separate instrument in the general form attached hereto as Exhibit G. b) In order to provide access to the City's property in the southeast portion of the development, the Developer agrees to deed Outlot A to the City by warranty deed. 16. Tree Replacement. The City's tree replacement ordinance limits the number of significant trees which may be removed from a property without replacement. There are numerous significant trees within the whole development and the Developer's site plan calls for the removal of more trees than is permitted without replacement under City code. Since the whole development exceeds 20 acres in area, no more than 15 percent of all significant trees may be removed without replacement. The Developer's plans call for removal of 28.6 percent of significant trees. The Developer is required to replace 3,062 caliper inches of trees within the whole development. An approved tree replacement plan required some trees to be planted in connection with the first phase, some to be planted with the second phase and others to be planted at the time of approval of subsequent phases. 17. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection. a) The Developer agrees to pay to the City an administrative fee in the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its reasonable costs and expenses in reviewing the Subdivision, including the drafting and negotiation of this Agreement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City in full for such reasonable costs within 45 days after notice in writing by the City. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost incurred in the enforcement of any provision of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. b) The Developer shall also pay a fee for City construction observation and administration relating to construction of the Subdivision Improvements. Construction observation shall include inspection of all the Subdivision Improvements. In order to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost of inspection of the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer shall deposit an additional $ into an escrow account with the City, which shall receive and hold such funds solely under the terms of this Agreement. The City shall reimburse itself for expenses from the escrow and will provide the Developer with a copy of any invoice from the city engineer or evidence of other cost or expense attributed to the escrow prior to deducting such funds from the escrow. If any funds held under this escrow exceed the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its costs under this section, such funds shall be returned to the Developer without interest. If it appears that the actual costs incurred will exceed the estimate, the Developer and the City shall review the costs required to complete the project and the Developer shall deposit additional sums with the City. 18. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to construction or repair of any of the Subdivision Improvements or any other work or undertaking required by this Agreement, and such default continues for 30 days after the City provides notice to the Developer of the nature of the default pursuant to the notice requirements in this Agreement, or if such default cannot be cured within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to cure the default provided that Developer is making a good faith effort to cure said default, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly 5068790 RHB ME230-664 I I reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek an order from any court for permission to enter the Property for such purposes. If the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy special assessments against the land within the Subdivision to recover the costs thereof. For this purpose, the Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, expressly waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments, including but not limited to, hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the land so assessed. The Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, also waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 429.081. 19. Insurance. The Developer agrees to take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six months after the City has accepted the Subdivision Improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its contractors or subcontractors. Liability limits shall not be less than $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission or for any other claim and $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. The certificate of insurance shall provide that the City must be given the same advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance as is afforded to the Developer. 20. Floodplain Regulations. No structures, including fences and accessory structures, may be constructed within the Subdivision below the regulatory flood protection elevation. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the City with regard to flood protection. Any utilities which are installed by the Developer on ground the surface of which is below the regulatory flood protection elevation must be flood proof in accordance with the state building code and City requirements. 21. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy. a) No approval granted by the City regarding the Subdivision previously or in this Agreement includes approval of a building permit for any structure within the Subdivision. The Developer must submit and the City must approve building plans prior to an application for a building permit for a structure on any lot within the Subdivision. All building pads must be certified prior to initiation of construction of a home on a lot. The Developer or the party applying for a building permit shall be responsible for payment of the customary fees associated with the building permit and all other deferred fees as specified in this Agreement. b) No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any home constructed in the Subdivision unless prior thereto the lot has been graded and all landscaping, including sod, has been installed in accordance with the Plans, the driveway has been installed, the footing drain tile or sump pump is discharging in an approved location, the water service valve is in proper working order and an as built survey of the lot has been submitted and approved by the City. In cases in which seasonal weather conditions make compliance with these conditions impossible, the City may accept an escrow of sufficient amount to ensure completion of the work during the following construction season. 5068790 RHB ME230-664 12 22. Clean up and Dust Control. The Developer shall clean on a daily basis dirt and debris from streets adjoining the Subdivision resulting from construction work by the Developer, its contractors, agents or assigns, including any party constructing houses within the Subdivision. Prior to any construction on the Property or adjacent areas, the Developer shall identify to the City in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall provide dust control to the satisfaction of the City's engineer throughout construction within the Subdivision. 23. Model Homes. The Developer may utilize no more than 5 model homes at any time within the entire Reserve of Medina development. The Developer shall obtain building permits from the City prior to construction of the model homes. The permits and certificates of occupancy for these model homes shall be granted by the City prior to the streets being paved with the final wear course of bituminous and after the sanitary sewer and water utilities have been completed in accordance with the Plans but prior to being accepted by the City. The Developer shall use these model homes only for real estate sales and no other purposes. 24. Compliance with Laws. The Developer agrees to comply with all laws, resolutions, ordinances, regulations and directives of the state of Minnesota and the City applicable to the Subdivision. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of Minnesota. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits for lots within the Subdivision. 25. Agreement Runs With the Land. This Agreement shall run with the Property and shall be recorded against the title thereto and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the City and the Developer and their successors and assigns. The Developer's successors in title may be responsible for certain obligations under this Agreement as required by the City. Upon request by Developer or its successors or assigns, the City will issue a certificate in recordable form which certifies the extent which the Developer is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement, and if Developer has fully complied with and completed all terms of this Agreement, releasing the Developer from this Agreement. As of the date hereof, the Developer warrants that to Developer's actual knowledge, there are no unrecorded encumbrances or interests relating to the Property. The Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 26. Indemnification. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from approval of the Subdivision. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees, except matters involving intentional acts or gross negligence by the City. 27. Assignment. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the prior written permission of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or denied. 5068790 RHB ME230-664 13 28. Notices. Any notice or correspondence to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed to be given if delivered personally or sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested: a) as to Developer: Toll MN, L.P. 3100 West Higgins Road Suite 100 Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 Attention: Keith Anderson with a copy to: Chris Dolan, Esq. Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1425 b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either parry may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this section. The Developer shall notify the City if there is any change in its name or address. 29. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such section and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other section or provision of this Agreement. 30. Non -waiver. Each right, power or remedy conferred upon the City by this Agreement is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, or available to the City at law or in equity, or under any other agreement. Each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. If either parry waives in writing any default or nonperformance by the other parry, such waiver shall be deemed to apply only to such event and shall not waive any other prior or subsequent default. 5068790 RHB ME230-664 14 31. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement. ************************ 506879v3 RHB ME230-664 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MEDINA Bob Mitchell, Mayor Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public 5068790 RHB ME230-664 16 TOLL MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership By: Toll MN GP Corp, its general partner By: Keith Anderson Its: Group President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on 2017, by Keith Anderson, the Group President of Toll MN GP Corp., the general partner of Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the general partnership. Notary Public This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 (RHB) 5068790 RHB ME230-664 17 EXHIBIT A TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Subdivision The land to which this Development Agreement applies is legally described as follows: Outlot C, Reserve of Medina To be platted as Lots 1 through 9, Block 1; Lots 1 through 20, Block 2; Lots 1 through 15; Block 3; and Outlots A and B, all in Reserve of Medina Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A-1 5068790 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT B TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT List of Plan Documents The following documents prepared by MFRA, Inc. constitute the Plans: [to be completed] 506879v3 RHB ME230-664 B-1 EXHIBIT C TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of , 2017, by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City") and Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of certain real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the City has obtained drainage and utility easements over portions of the Property and the initial phase of the Reserve of Medina (the "Easement Areas"); and WHEREAS, by a separate development agreement (the "Development Agreement"), the Developer has agreed to construct and maintain certain stormwater facilities (the "Stormwater Improvements") for the benefit of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Stormwater Improvements which are the subject of this Agreement include stormwater ponds and accompanying structures, including the stormwater pipe connecting the stormwater ponds, and sump pump connections for each lot of the subdivision. The location of the Stormwater Improvements are shown on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission requires permanent provisions for handling of storm runoff, including terms and conditions for operation and maintenance of all Stormwater Improvements, and requires such provisions to be set forth in an agreement to be recorded against the Property; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer intend to comply with certain conditions, including entering into a maintenance agreement regarding the Stormwater Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer, for itself and its successor or assigns, agrees to maintain the Stormwater Improvements and observe all drainage laws governing the operation and maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer shall make periodic inspection and perform maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements as 5068790 RHB ME230-664 C_ 1 described in Exhibit C attached hereto. The Developer shall make all such scheduled inspections and maintenance, keep record of all inspections and maintenance activities, and submit such records annually to the City. The cost of all inspections and maintenance, including skimming and cleaning of the Stormwater Improvements, shall be the obligation of the Developer and its successors or assigns as the fee owner of the Property, which obligation shall be assigned to the HOA, as defined hereinafter, in accordance with section 7 of this Agreement. 2. City's Maintenance Rights. The City may maintain the Stormwater Improvements, as provided in this paragraph, if the City reasonably believes that the Developer or its successors or assigns has failed to maintain the Stormwater Improvements in accordance with applicable drainage laws and other requirements and such failure continues for 30 days after the City gives the Developer written notice of such failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that Developer is making a good faith effort to complete said task. The City's notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. If Developer does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Areas and such portions of the Property as may reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Easement Areas to perform such maintenance tasks. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Developer or its successors or assigns, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer or its successors or assigns fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses in maintaining the Stormwater Improvements within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Property. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding the Stormwater Improvements benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an emergency, as determined by the city engineer, the 30-day notice requirement to the Developer for failure to perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety by the Developer, and the Developer shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any expense so incurred by the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has been given. 3. Hold Harmless. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or resulting from the Developer's, or the Developer's agents' or employees' negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents or employees to take any other prudent precautions, except to the extent of intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. In the event the City, upon the failure of the Developer to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives for its own negligent acts in the performance of the Developer's required work under this Agreement, but C-2 5068790 RHB ME230-664 this indemnification shall not extend to intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. 4. Costs of Enforcement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable costs prudently incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees after providing written notice to Developer and a reasonable opportunity to cure. 5. Rights Not Exclusive. No right of the City under this Agreement shall be deemed to be exclusive and the City shall retain all rights and powers it may have under Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve the Stormwater Improvements. 6. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered or be sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: a) as to Developer: Toll MN, L.P. 3100 West Higgins Road Suite 100 Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 Attention: Keith Anderson with a copy to: Chris Dolan, Esq. Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1425 b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 ATTN: City Administrator with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 7. Successors and Assigns. All duties and obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Developer's successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon creation of a homeowners' association for the Property (the "HOA") by an instrument in a C-3 5068790 RHB ME230-664 form satisfactory to the City which assumes and agrees to perform the obligations and responsibilities of the Developer under this Agreement, the HOA shall be bound by all terms and conditions of this Agreement as if it were the original signatory hereto and the Developer, its successors and assigns, shall be released from all personal liability under this Agreement but the Property shall remain subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 8. Supplements Previous Agreement. The City and the Developer previously entered into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in connection with the initial phase of the Reserve of Medina, which agreement was recorded against all the property in the development as doc. No. in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. This Stormwater Maintenance Agreement supplements and does not replace the original agreement. 9. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be binding and effective as of the date first written above. TOLL MN, L.P., By: Toll MN GP Corp, its general partner Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) Keith Anderson Group President This instrument was acknowledged before me on 2017, by Keith Anderson, the Group President of Toll MN GP Corp., the general partner of Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the general partnership. Notary Public C-4 5068790 RHB ME230-664 CITY OF MEDINA Bob Mitchell, Mayor Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and the city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public This instrument drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 C-5 5068790 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT A TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property The property to which this Stormwater Maintenance Agreement applies is legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 9, Block 1; Lots 1 through 20, Block 2; Lots 1 through 25; Block 3; and Outlots A and B, all in Reserve of Medina Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. C-A-1 5068790 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT B TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Depiction of Location of Stormwater Improvements [to be included] C-B-1 506879v3 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT C TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Inspection and Maintenance Schedule Stormwater Ponds: Inspection and maintenance shall be made consistent with the most recent version of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual or other subsequent manual as dictated by the City. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the schedule can be found in Table 12.POND.4 of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual as follows: Table • r .4: Typical InspectionfMainteri Frequencies for Ponds Inspection Items Nfaintenance Items Frequency Ensure that at least 50 % of wetland plants survive Replant well vegetation One time -After First Check for invasive wetland plants. Year Check that maintenance access is free and clear. Inspect law flow orifices, reverse flow pipes, and other pipes for clogging Mowing —minimum Spring and Fall Check the permanent pool or dry pond area for floating debris, undesirable vegetation. Remove debris Monthly to Quarterly or Investigate the shoreline for erasion Repair undercut, eroded, and bare soil areas. After Major Storms (n1") Monitor wetland plant composition and health. Look for broken signs, lacks, and other dangerous items. Trash. and debris clean-up day Monitor wetland plant composition and Remove invasive plants health. Identify invasive plants Harvest wetland plants Semi-annual to annual Ensure mechanical components are Replant wetland vegetation functional Repair broken mechanical components if needed All routine inspection items above Inspect riser, barrel, and embankment for Pipe and Riser Repair damage Forebay maintenance and sediment Every 1 W 3 years Inspect all pipes removal when. needed Monitor sediment deposition in pond and forebay Monitor sediment deposition in pond and Forebay maintenance and sediment 2-7 years forebay removal when needed Remote television inspection of reverse Sediment removal from main pondl slope pipes, under -drains, and other hard to wetland 5-25 years access piping Pipe replacement it needed Stormwater Pond Sand Filters: Inspection and maintenance shall be made consistent with the most recent version of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual or other subsequent manual as dictated by the City. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the schedule can be found in Table 12.FIL.4 of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual as follows: C-C-1 5068790 RHB ME230-664 Table 12.FIL.4. Recommended Maintenance Activities for Media filters (Sources: Activity WMI, Schedule If filter bed Is clogged or partially clogged, manual manipulation of the surface layer of sand may be required. Remove the top few inches of media, roto-till or otherwise cultivate the surface, and replace media with like material meeting the As needed design specifications. Replace any fitter fabric that has become dogged. Ensure Mat contributing area, facility,mesan outlets are clear o ens. Ensure that the contributing area is stabilized and mowed, with clippings removed Remove trash and debris_ Check to ensure that the filter surface is not clogging (also check after storms greater than about 1"). Monthly Ensure that activities in the drainage area minimize oillgrease and sediment entry to the system_ If permanent water level is present in pre-treatment chamber (e.g., perimeter sand filter), ensure that the chamber does not leak and normal pool level is ec o see Mat the tiller bed is clean of sediment and the s rmen am er Is not more than 6 inches of sediment. Remove sediment as necessary. Make sure that there is no evidence of detenoration, spalling or cracking of concrete. Inspect grates (perimeter sand filter)_ Inspect inlets, eutets and overflow spillway fo ensure good condition and no Annually evidence of erosion. Repair or replace any damaged structural parts. Stabilize any eroded areas. Ensure that flow is not bypassing the facilityEnsure Val no not ceable odors are detected puts de Ifle facilily Remove and replace the top 2-5 inches of media every 3 to 5 years for low sediment applications, more often for areas of high sediment yield or high oil 3 to 5 years and grease. In addition to the above, ponds shall be inspected annually to determine if draw down occurs within 48 hours, and corrections made if the time exceeds 48 hours. C-C-2 5068790 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT D TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE [to be completed] D-1 506879v3 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT E TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF WARRANTY DEED STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $1.70 Total consideration for this transfer is $500.00 or less. Date: , 2017 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, Grantor, hereby conveys and warrants to city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, Grantee, real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Outlot A, Reserve of Medina Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, subject to all easements, restrictions and covenants of record. ❑ The Seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. ❑ A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document. ❑ I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. TOLL MN, L.P., By: Toll MN GP Corp, its general partner C Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) Keith Anderson Group President This instrument was acknowledged before me on 2017, by Keith Anderson, the Group President of Toll MN GP Corp., the general partner of Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the general partnership. Notary Public E-1 5068790 RHB ME230-664 Check here if part or all of the land is Registered (Torrens) ❑ Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should be sent to (include name and address of Grantee): City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 This instrument drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 (RHB) E-2 5068790 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT F TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made this day of , 2017, by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Grantor"). RECITALS A. Grantor is the fee owner of property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"). B. Grantor and the City have entered into a separate development agreement (the "Development Agreement") regarding the subdivision and development of the Property. C. The City has granted approval of the plat of Reserve of Medina Second Addition concerning the Property (the "City Approvals"), under the terms of which the Grantor is required to establish upland buffers adjacent to wetlands on portions of the Property consistent with City regulations (the "Easement Area"). D. In accordance with the Development Agreement, the City Approvals and the City's wetland preservation ordinance, the City has requested that Grantor grant to the City a conservation easement (the "Upland Buffer Easement") over the Easement Area. E. The Easement Area is legally described in Exhibit B and depicted in Exhibit C, both attached hereto. F. Grantor is willing to grant the Upland Buffer Easement in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. PROVISIONS In consideration of the mutual promises of the parties contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, an Upland Buffer Easement in, under, on, over and across the Easement Area, and the City hereby accepts such grant. The duration of this easement is perpetual, subject to Minnesota law governing granting of easements to governmental bodies, and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns. F-1 5068790 RHB ME230-664 2. The following terms and conditions shall apply to the Easement Area: a. The Easement Area shall be preserved predominantly in its natural condition, except to the extent set forth below. No use shall be made of the Easement Area except uses, if any, which would not change or alter the condition of the Easement Area or its drainage, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, or fish and wildlife habitat and characteristics. b. No structures, hardcover or other improvements shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon, above or beneath the Easement Area, with the exception of a boardwalk or dock not to exceed four feet in width to allow reasonable access to the wetland. C. No trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed, cut or removed from the Easement Area except as is necessary to remove storm damage, diseased or non- native vegetation or as authorized by the prior written consent of the City consistent with the wetland preservation ordinance. A path no more than four feet in width may be mowed to allow reasonable access to the wetland. d. No earth, peat, gravel or soil, sand or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Easement Area and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the City. e. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area, and no waste, trash, yard waste, manure or other materials shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the City. 3. Grantor represents that Grantor owns the Easement Area in fee simple, subject only to the encumbrances of record. 4. The Grantor conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, the following rights: a. The City may enter upon the Easement Area for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Easement Area without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Easement Area. If there is a violation of the covenants contained herein, the City shall provide notice and an order for corrective action consistent with City regulations. If the Grantor does not take the required corrective action within the time period required in the order for corrective action F-2 5068790 RHB ME230-664 or thirty (30) days, whichever is longer, the City may enter the Property in order to perform the action. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Grantor, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Grantor fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses within 45 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Property. The Grantor, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that any such corrective work performed by the City benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. b. The City may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction against the Grantor to enforce the terms of this Agreement; to require restoration of the Easement Area to its prior or more natural condition; to enjoin such non- compliance by temporary or permanent injunction and to recover any damages arising from such non-compliance. If a court determines that the Grantor has failed to comply with this Agreement, Grantor or Grantor's successors or assigns shall reimburse the City for any reasonable costs of enforcement, including costs of restoration, court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees, in addition to any other payments ordered by the court. 5. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Easement Area. 6. Grantor retains all responsibilities and shall bear all costs and liabilities of any kind related to ownership, operation and maintenance of the Property and the Easement Area except to the extent caused by intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. 7. Grantor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officials, employees and agents, against any and all loss, costs, damage and expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs that the City incurs because of the breach of any of the above covenants or resulting from or due to Grantor's intentional misrepresentation of any material fact contained therein. The Grantor and the City agree that each shall be responsible for their own acts and the results of such acts and shall not be responsible for the act of the other party and the results of such acts. 8. This Agreement may be amended only by mutual written agreement of the parties. 9. Nothing herein shall give the general public a right of access to the Property. F-3 5068790 RHB ME230-664 10. Grantor's obligations under this Agreement run with the Property and shall be binding on the Developer's successors and assigns. Grantor's personal obligations under this Agreement terminate upon transfer or termination of its interest in the Property, provided that any liability for acts or omissions occurring prior to the transfer or termination shall survive that transfer or termination. The Developer has established a homeowners' association for the Property (the "HOA"). Upon completion of the Upland Buffers, the Developer intends to assign to the HOA the obligations and responsibilities of the Developer under this Agreement. The HOA shall be bound by all terms and conditions of this Agreement as if it were the original signatory hereto and the Developer, its successors and assigns, shall be released from all personal liability under this Agreement but the Property shall remain subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Nothing in this Paragraph 10 is deemed to alter or amend the remaining terms of the Agreement in the event of a transfer of the Grantor's interest 11. Any notice required in this Agreement shall be delivered personally or sent by U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested: a) as to Developer: Toll MN, L.P. 3100 West Higgins Road Suite 100 Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 Attention: Keith Anderson b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 ATTN: City Administrator or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. F-4 5068790 RHB ME230-664 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Upland Buffer Easement Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. TOLL MN, L.P., By: Toll MN GP Corp, its general partner Keith Anderson Its: Group President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on 2017, by Keith Anderson, the Group President of Toll MN GP Corp., the general partner of Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the general partnership. Notary Public F-5 506879v3 RHB ME230-664 CITY OF MEDINA an STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Bob Mitchell, Mayor Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public This instrument drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 F-6 5068790 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT A TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description The Property to which this Upland Buffer Easement Agreement applies is legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 9, Block 1; Lots 1 through 20, Block 2; Lots 1 through 25; Block 3; and Outlots A and B, all in Reserve of Medina Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. F-A-1 5068790 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT B TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of Upland Buffer Easement [to be completed] F-B-1 506879v3 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT C TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Depiction of Upland Buffer Easement [to be completed} F-C-1 506879v3 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT G TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF TRAIL EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is made by Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, Grantor, in favor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Grantee. R avitalc A. Grantor is the fee owner of the property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"). B. Grantor desires to grant to the Grantee a trail easement, according to the terms and conditions contained herein. C. The easement is legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto. The easement is depicted in Exhibit C attached hereto. Terms of Easements 1. Grant of Easement. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor, Grantor grants and conveys to the Grantee a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for trail purposes over, under, across and through the portion of the Property legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto. 2. Scope of Easement. The perpetual easement for trail purposes granted herein includes the right of the Grantee, its contractors, agents, and employees to locate, construct, operate, maintain, alter and repair trail facilities within the described easement area. The easement granted herein also includes the right to cut, trim, or remove from the easement areas trees, shrubs, or other vegetation as in the Grantee's judgment unreasonably interfere with the easement or facilities of the Grantee, its successors or assigns. 3. Warranty of Title. The Grantor warrants it is the owner of the Property and has the right, title and capacity to convey to the Grantee the easement herein. 4. Environmental Matters. The Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs, expenses, damages, demands, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorney's fees, or losses resulting from any claims, actions, suits or proceedings based upon a release or threat of release G-1 5068790 RHB ME230-664 of any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants which may have existed on, or which relate to, the easement area or Property prior to the date of this instrument. 5. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this instrument shall run with the land and be binding on the Grantor, its heirs and assigns. STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: NONE Dated this day of , 2017. TOLL MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership By: Toll MN GP Corp, its general partner Keith Anderson Its: Group President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on 2017, by Keith Anderson, the Group President of Toll MN GP Corp., the general partner of Toll MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the general partnership. Notary Public NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 G-2 5068790 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT A TO TRAIL EASEMENT [to be completed] G-A-1 506879v3 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT B TO TRAIL EASEMENT [to be completed] G-B-1 506879v3 RHB ME230-664 EXHIBIT C TO TRAIL EASEMENT [to be completed] G-C-1 506879v3 RHB ME230-664 �� /AL YY SB �%W 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541-4800M August 31, 2017 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: The Reserve of Medina 2nd Addition Final Plat  Engineering Review City Project No. LR-17-213 WSB Project No. 010120-000 Dear Mr. Finke: We have reviewed The Reserve of Medina Concept plan submittal received August 10, 2017. The plans propose to construct 46 single family parcels. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Grading Plan 1. Add wetland buffer cross hatching to legend on Sheet C2.0. 2. Show proposed grades for all driveways. In some locations, the contours shown through the ends of the driveways are too steep. 3. Correct the grading limits to encompass all of the surface disturbance proposed. 4. Low points on roadway must have draintile installed 50 lineal feet in each direction. 5. Label road low point EOF's at all locations. Grading provisions shall be made to convey drainage between houses. 6. The City requires 2' of freeboard from the EOF to the lowest floor opening, correct in the locations where this is not met. Street & Storm Sewer Plan 7. The City requires the "MnDOT Type V" geotextile fabric to be comprised of an 8-ounce non -woven fabric per the City standard details (TenCate Mirafi 180N, or approved equal). 8. The City requires a minimum of 90' vertical curve, correct on Sheets C7.2 and C7.3. 9. Show graphically the draintile at low points in the street. Extend 50 feet from each side of the catch basins, correct note "B". 10. Sump collection systems must be within a drainage and utility easements; many of the proposed locations are not. Building a legacy  your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.como The Reserve of Medina 2°d Addition Final Plat — Engineering Review August 31, 2017 Page 2 11. Show storm sewer pipe sizes on plan view (Sheets C5.0, C7.1-C7.6). 12. Show class of storm sewer in profile notes, consider stronger class for deeper sections of pipe. 13. The profile grades of Lillium Trail are shown to drain into the future phase to the north. Provisions should be made to collect this runoff into the storm sewer system. 14. The City requires flared ends and the pipe leads connecting to them to be RCP. Show RCP for pipes between STRM 101, 102, and 103. 15. Add detail for HDPE pipe bedding and casting information. 16. Show sizes of storm sewer structures on the plans. Utility Plan 17. The watermain improvements will require approval from the MDH, provide completed and approved permit documents. 18. The sanitary sewer improvements will require a permit from the MPCA, provide completed and approved permit documents. 19. Consider future phases of the development in regards to sewer, water, and storm sewer system connections. Confirm that a sanitary connection is not required along Lillium Trail to the northerly future phase. Extend a watermain stub to the road ROW between Lots 3 and 4 Block 2. The City is not responsible for field corrections to utilities to serve future phases. 20. On utility plan Note 2, the City's minimum requirements are: SDR 35 for depths less than 18', SDR26 for depths between 18' and 26', DR 18 for pipe depths greater than 26 feet. Correct the general note on Sheet C5.0 and on the profile sheets where not meeting this minimum requirement. 21. City design guidelines allow a maximum hydrant spacing of 350', please correct. 22. Add a note and linework in profile to note outside drop on manhole 9 in accordance with City Detail (SAN-04). 23. In addition to the City Details for the sanitary sewer manholes the City will require the following. For all sanitary sewer manholes, the City will require 6" wide rubberized mastic sealant placed on the exterior of the structure over the barrel joints. For manholes located adjacent to, or within the wetland, the City will require that the manholes constructed with waterproof joints and sealed manhole covers. 24. Add note for restoration of existing rip -rap at pond overflow to proper EOF elevation. 25. Eliminate errant leader note on Sheet C6.4. Stormwater Management 26. General stormwater management requirements were approved for the entire development with the approval of Phase 1. Submit a revised stormwater management report for the project, specifically including changes made for the 2nd Addition. 27. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards. Provide completed and approved permit documents. The Reserve of Medina 2°d Addition Final Plat — Engineering Review August 31, 2017 Page 3 28. Freeboard requirements will need to be met for Block 3, Lots 14 & 15. EOF is listed at 1014.5. Lowest opening needs to be 2 feet above this elevation. Erosion Control 29. An NPDES permit must be submitted to the City prior to start of construction. 30. Biorolls should be added in the drainage ditch in the backyards to minimize sediment flow prior to the inlets. 31. Double silt fence should be established in the backyards of Block 1, Lots 8 & 9 adjacent to the stormwater pond. 32. Silt fence should be extended to the west side of Block 1 Lot 1. 33. City of Medina erosion control details need to be included in the plan. 34. Add a hatch and notes for restoration of the wetland buffer where along the proposed sanitary sewer alignment. Wetlands & Buffers 35. Plans should clearly mark the wetland boundary on all pages. It is unclear if the crosshatching represents the wetland or the upland buffer. 36. Plans should include the average and minimum upland buffer widths provided for each wetland and should also provide detail on how buffers will be restored and demarcate where buffer monuments will be placed. 37. The wetland delineation for this property was approved in December 2012 (L-12-090). This approval will expire in December 2017. If development approvals are expected after December 2017, the developer will need to provide an updated wetland delineation in order to re -approve the wetland boundaries. The City or agents of the City are not responsible for errors and omissions on the plans. The owner/developer is fully responsible for changes or modifications required in field to meet the City's standards. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer RESERVE OF MEDINA 2ND ADDITION R.T.DOC.NO. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That TOLL MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, fee owner, of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota to wit: Outlot C, RESERVE OF MEDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Has caused the some to be surveyed and platted as RESERVE OF MEDINA 2ND ADDITION and does hereby grant to the city of Medina, Minnesota the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said TOLL MN, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ------------> 201 __. TOLL MN, L.P. By Jon Henson, Vice President STATE OF_. COUNTY OF Vice President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, ______ My Commission Expires County, day of Notary Printed Name day of 201 __, by Anders Gode, Vice President of TOLL MN, L.P., a I, Eric Roeser, hereby certify that this plat of RESERVE OF MEDINA 2ND ADDITION is a correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat: that all monuments depicted on the plat have been or will be correctly set within one year as indicated on the plat; that all water boundaries and wet lands as of the date of the surveyor's certification are shown and labeled on the plat: that all public ways are shown and labeled on the plat. I further certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Eric Roeser Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 47476 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this Notary Public, __________County, _ My Commission Expires January 31, 20 day of ____________- 201 __, by Eric Roeser, a Licensed Land Surveyor. Notary Printed Name MEDINA, MINNESOTA This plat of RESERVE OF MEDINA 2ND ADDITION, was approved and accepted by the City Council of Medina, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this _____ day of ____________ , 201__. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30—day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. Bob Mitchell, Mayor go TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Hennepin County, Minnesota , Mayor I hereby certify that taxes payable in 201 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this Mark V. Chapman, County Auditor SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota in Pursuant to MINN. STAT. Sec. 38313.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this Chris Mavis, County Surveyor REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota M ,Deputy day of ____________- 201 __. I hereby certify that the within RESERVE OF MEDINA 2ND ADDITION was filed in this office this ________ day of Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles go ,Deputy day of 201 __, at o'clock_.m. 201 __. Egan,Field & Nowak, Inc. land surveyors since 1872 RESERVE OF MEDINA 2ND ADDITION NORTHWEST CORNER THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 118 NORTH, RANGE 23 W, i HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN I A/ I I A A r- A r / 1 I A/ 1 n A n n I 7-1 i V V I L_ LJ I V I L_ /- LJ LJ V V I V LJ /-1 LJ LJ 1 I I lJ V NO°17'18'E 49.00 33 33 Q- J � Z! � " O� OOOp h 3 �a m� � v 0 LQ z NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 118 NORTH, RANGE 23 W HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN cW R.T. DOC. NO. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 118 NORTH, RANGE 23 W, \� HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN N 0 100 200 300 SCALE IN FEET • FOUND IRON MONUMENT O SET IRON MONUMENT MARKED WITH LICENSE NUMBER 47476 The east line of Outlot C, RESERVE OF MEDINA and the east line of the Northeast Quarter is assumed to bear South 00 degrees 17 minutes 18 seconds West Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc. land surveyors since 1872 C] LIJ RESERVE OF MEDINA 2ND ADDITION o�A 0 OUTLOT B J � �Co 33 Cn I:) F- F- I�) / r- 1 F_- A A r_- r� I n I A aE 38• '� W I I \ V L_ L/ I I VI L_ LJ I I V /-1 I JO N'1ro1'l�� N Z �� I UV 1 L_lJ 1 v WQW Q J 11/ /\ N N z to \ 8 J �46.650„��\ S89 4242"E N 50.00 � � o w\ ,36" _ " N89 42 42 W 160 DO ,51 ° h 34-01 i y II w\\w� 0S�74r R/2503� Ln N894242"W 96.11 14673 „ '0 22.56W ooIf to3 i 71.11 25 25 N I r\ 04 97;I . I I7 1� 15 " %�F 331.64 31aIgg oI I N L-----------J Ui / Op 06 s°N89 4242"W 160.00 -I cB `38.3i \R� \ / / \ko 10 I^ o i� I I I 3 33 `Y a l /' �0> . -'� \ \ \ ` Ar 61 / , % ww` \ 9 o I I I ca k6 B 44 / dry/ / 0 / ^ \ \ ��\ \ \ / OQ 3a AO / pro\ \ Z a rn l 14 I N �aSo , �, / \ \ / 09 2 �O / `5000\ s¢s¢°'J/ / �`�/ / o� I�\\ % >\' Sy6/G� QQ \\\\\ J-------� . L------------I \ \ / / `i 1Q� 2w\ \ '� \ \ -• )00',( F 4 \ / \ 8 \ /� N89 42 42 W 25 r - - - - ' " - - - - - DO \ 'S a 'h 3 �\ /Q ✓ / cro\ \ �/ k1 ' / 25 N893323 W 160.00 '\°°ooQ�8sg\' / / / / ^ I 000eC'�,y`'g _�o�r�,16 6 %l 2%�\ o \ /' < / i I rnN�l A4.47i ' i/w\�6\\3a' s / moo. 7 °9 9- _ l- _ �121 45\"', °.,�, / \ \ 13 °R=225.00 a=674549" / \ \ \a \ / \ \ N>266.11c°��cy�`�`b 80 CB=N89'S 038761 "W �1 41' 2$ o"w\ \ V 11'r \ \�6j / a \ \ \ 12 93.57 93.85 i C� �\ \\ �21'3032 N\ \ �\ \ 1 �'°� a< \ \\ 5%� 12 N \ ct,\ \ 93i�8y9 / \ \ kj01 //`� <\,1's�• // 2 =� / // to I �`� \\ . 3iEj v /// \\ \ 13 \\ \ //y ' ryo�o I� I cn\ 612i / \ \ \ it` �\ \ t,2 / 16 \ \ \ \ 62 96 N •. 6 /� '!.'5 634p\ �, �N// / 3 �� I 4 �\ \\ to /'�2/�' a13° �zo \ \ \\ \ \, ' 91�9y 2;� \ -104 1- �3• " J 38 _ Iz I 45"E 6 �6'\ N I i �5,6•4�E �322 '� ` ` 134j I ( N�1%5' �� 69.32N439' \ \ \ \\ \ \�. / 63 k4 169i g 8 8 y \ � 9i p \ g 0 I 1 \ `�j_j0 51 "� p�NP�T \ \ 15 \\ \ 1" /' .p6y1"�' ao I I I I I \ ` 39,35,,E 77.2? ( �,°& ���MEN� \ \ \ \ 16 s y9 .� oI 29 I I I I N79' - \ 1 EPSE \ \ \ \ �p3 y2�9a A �� 19 1 \\ \ >�,•'%' 10 Z 1816 -1 � IT L_�17 s8o1.8• 892-1-C=18.63 4 w Ny9�' 6 y1 CB=N89'30'58"W I I I I I I I 1 1$ 0•00 � j.� 3y o\ \ 64'g6 p0 R=3025.00 A 021 10 a=o o7'3s'• J �- / �'\ ►Y o,\ \ K- ,y0• , o L - - d-14449 " I I: 6 I I 41 '35 - - \ z R 52 18.63-� J L- 4=13459" �? - .71 �=8_" 61 i \ \ \ 5i--V' i \ 92.23 - 101.17 - J d=877'29" _ J ►- - - 110.00 40'11 / 92; �03 \ 1 2\ - - - - - 75 p0 834. � %6 5 N \ O 'To \ -104.92 � v \ ° �,,\ \ o� \ \ 91 SEMEN R=3000.00 d=3'47'25" R� 453 50.00- _ �' 1se'46 _ 3 32"E 2 7� \ �\ \ N35'13'30'E N77'06 56• 6 51 24 30.69 NO'39'37"E \ 0=1 s8.42 - C6- \ \ i CB=S8726'40.44'E N I 917 14 7990 76 -51� 2NN \79\\1,0�S2 r d=1_19y - 32737 9189- -11:44 60R=2975.00 A-07948 _d6736" C=1714 d=54312 P\NPQE Yf \ \ CB=S89'30'17"E N I rn I I N I I 19.75 I I I I \\ 6 \\ 26', I a=022 49" I I I I \ �,\ \ Nye �� rn cr o o; x- 3 I o I I o I I I 31 311 II 5 NI \\ Ny6 p' T N8651'32"E i �' �_ �_ i � V �_ U i IAV I �_ L- I I / A, o I 1 0 l I 2 o f I 3 I o MI I\\ \ zl i ozzl I -=�, ------N26626'E VS87260 4 34.96E-2� 11p.81 '* I -- � 2p6. A _ L-------J IL J'95g3 �0�3�51� 97.00 97.00 97.00 114.17 16.86 5 S89'55'51 "W 422.02 \y--DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT I I� LO r< Cc I� I 0 R.T. DOC. NO. C] C] 0 60 120 180 C ] SCALE IN FEET • FOUND IRON MONUMENT SET IRON MONUMENT MARKED WITH LICENSE NUMBER 47476 The east line of Outlot C, RESERVE OF MEDINA and the east line of the Northeast Quarter is assumed to bear South 00 degrees 17 minutes 18 seconds West DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: C] 10.00 -� 5.00 -�I - �� I I - I�- 5.00 1r- 10.00 - - - J L - - 1 - BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING REAR LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER - OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 118 NORTH, RANGE 23 W, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN �� I 1 I� Egan, 'Field & Nowak, Inc. land surveyors since 1872 M1 m M6 W 00 i N 00 0 4-1 U) Q 01 LIJ LLJ ) N L L w 0 0 0 U U) 4-1 Q) N ,.� V I C3 C) Q U U) Q) 0 V O U) U) S✓ O m O U) i N O M� W O L!J .J UI 04 0 U O O Q 0 0 T E Y 0 U0 0 .3 0 t U C O O O_ U O Q 0 F 0 T E Y T 0 0 O U S 0 0 0 `o 7 O C .3 0 0 3 c E U O 0 O U 0 0 O E 0 0 O ry O 0 0- 0 of 5 U iE 0 O O a a 0 U m 0 T C 0 N O U N 0 c E 0 0 a a o� 0 0 a U O U 0 3 0 E U O L H SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE RESERVE OF M DINA SECOND ADDITION PROJECT TEAM: ENGINEER DEVELOPER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TOLL BROTHERS, INC. Kimley>>> HornToll.. y Home �• PREPARED BY: MIKE BRANDT P.E. 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE W, SUITE 238 N ST. PAU L, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 SURVEYOR EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. ERIC ROESER, P.L.S. 1229 TYLER STREET NE, SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 TELEPHONE (612) 466-3300 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHAD E. FEIGUM, PLA 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE W, SUITE 238N ST. PAU L, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 JON HENSON 14260 23RD AVENUE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 TELEPHONE (651) 365-0601 GEOTECHNICAL BRAUN INTERTEC HENRY VLOO, P.E. 1101 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 TELEPHONE (952) 995-2000 SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 118N, RANGE 23W MEDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN LOST HORSE RD. ® KATRINKA RD. TI ION C 53 3 2 BLUEBELL TR, N. a _ 34Ss ybR. N. ¢ Nf LATES RANCH M. PAWIEE RD. R23w i F 19N d} �, < ASTER BRIDOEW AT€R A a �R. �'+ Medina PEE r { dLILWM TR.]) Peter 1\ Fb PA r WA RD, Lake LRIPPEWA RD. $L "LLff 2' CT': SHAWNf�.. WOODS xeF'RR FARMS RD. Canadian NdAc Ratl. SY3 o F°krq� S r a # Tq 3N a N JLIBETR. o ! fin �� 18 F'RAlRi€ IE EU 4 14 O ® RNA u R?}w MEANDER `u gP' f I p Rf v i ,�1P y I I} R, �P� r r9 li.� _��C! T�\\ �a ' SITE y r t 6N E1IYERUR N R �I \T6i 1 5N P�+4 2 f CHERRY RLL G+ T II 12 CHERRY. C.Rt3w R23w �, CNERgre 6L Thomas `�y Lake � ::: H Oq TR. 4�`� a HIlL SR• no�� xl a � CLY x TBW R' RSngCe Y CLYbESDALE 181 ` u Wiraerhalter Lake w r 'wl: T pHA S 115 RI COAyA h NCF� r < TR. ARIL w TI 18R urr 8 9 TI ION Harnel iD II 3 115 IT 16 113 15 IA OAK TR. R2'3W / R23w RED FOX �// 2 HAMEL RD. A KF T a MACNOL I WILDFLOWER Spl.rxam Luke .10 4F RD, a ASSWO TR. 91 TLCKBOROUCH 1¢ a' r SRib L PA RT7. E. F O.Rw A �Su+ CT. m J RAY A� OR, o o LWESTN T_ Rii. w a: Y _ 0 0 .. TRAPPERS x � c I � a i1I8N � T118N TIION I$ 17 iS �� I-0I} R23w School 2CH€Y€NNE 4¥ Lake � R73w i i] T.. m MORCAN �'YSLISN � RD. TR. � D M€Lahr LN. W L BAKER 4 24 apev��w ERVE HOII e � 01 COTTDNIYODO TR. � �`.'J a Z~ j�.Akg vd ., OAK CIR,V- 2 Thies 3 "Apo ION 5 a Lake CIR. o CfR, f�. V W112.1 0 2! - TI ION VI%EN RD l 29 26 22 23 gEROKEE Rb. r � R23w R23W l .. TR. L. _ DEERRILL RD.. VICINITY N.T.S. NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A 221, X 341, SHEET. 3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. SHEET LIST TABLE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C0.0 COVER SHEET C1.0 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES C2.0 SITE AND SIGNAGE PLAN C3.0 GRADING PLAN C3.1 DRAINTILE PLAN C4.0 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PHASE 1 C4.1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PHASE 2 C5.0 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C6.1 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN C6.2 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN C6.3 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN C6.4 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN C7.1 STORM SEWER & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN C7.2 STORM SEWER & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN C7.3 STORM SEWER & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN C7.4 STORM SEWER & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN C7.5 STORM SEWER & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN C7.6 STORM SEWER & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN C8.0 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C8.1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C8.2 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS BENCHMARKS: 1. MNDT CADY, GSID #11222 ELEV. = 1008.695 NGVD 29 2. MNDT 2722AA, GSID #10283 ELEV. = 1008.748 NGVD 29 BENCHMARKS AS PROVIDED BY PREVIOUS SURVEYOR z 0 U) w OIz z �. J O U-_ Q Z ILL Oo Lu Q Oo � U O N r O U CO Lu rn z Q � � O � cfl 2 Z< lu-)j Lu Z ' J � LLj � O LLJ Z Y O= � W W Q cG Y } N w ■ �. z o Ln L0 N } tt. m o W Q Z Q QO�-- °, 6 Cf) -Ww a 0 z a a a 0 z Q O J �0UZ Q w W W W - n ~ 0 J F = O LF- J w 04 U I z LL P, CDOfO�oz U F- � Q= Q U :Lu O O z Q W to W _L fr Of z Z Z fn M W Z 0 m O w 3 X r co O X X cv Q r` In Q CoDOX Q CC)W m o X Y o Q w w Q in u 0 0 U w W _ U) W z > O O C) U Cn Q z z O 0 U w 2i z LL 0 LL O W z z / 0 L. �� `' / W5W v /^, L Q 0- W Cz G 2 J ~ w 00-00 SHEET NUMBER 0- CO.0 I .; 0 N 1001 U) Q w 0 Q z 0 U) W1 �E N U U) a) a) U) Ci 0 Q U U) a) 0 0 a) a) jA U) L- a) 4-1 L m 0 U) 0 L m c ° a " �I III III !=I I �;� II III III T ' L III - -� FUTURE I I III III III � / 9 _ � 1008.50 I I I I I I III III / \\�\� ' PHASE 1 / \ I III II I o I // WO I I II TEMPORARY TYPE ' / �\ V� 1p08.50 I I I �11 III s BARRICAf 8 � \ \ V\ � r / \ O �O � o � � � ° �� \ \ / / STOP SIGN I I ° N ., ° N I I 1 STOP BARE CD I _ I �-III IIII -III - - - 0. .01 41 - - - _15/// o °6/( - - - - - - - - - - - - .0 - a3a3c=a°Ua3c I I -�� - - �I II 1 l_I II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIpI II IIII IIIIIII IIIIIIII II II II I /=if` ����-_-=_a:�-�-_� /// //AI/\\IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_II I IIIIII IIIIII II II IIII IIIII IIII IIII I II I i I II 11II1l_I l ^'u � 1 l„' 11�1II�`I I II II �II`lII I�I l I "� 1l'\ i �` l /• \ �,e, \ �\ ��/oc.� o0 \/ /\/ //j°,/o\//\ff///�_I III I III I I \,I \ III II / I I/I I�I I I I I/ II/I / I /// //\\/ M /�\ II I �III III I / V// / /O ��// A,goO✓o\ °0'`° °/ \°/o / �\/o/\ \A/oA/\\oA\ /o\\\` \\\\ / A\\ \\\,,\ 'A``/� \\ /A\/ \\/\\/ /V\ /\A \ \ \ A/�\°p/o//\°\�o�v♦°�\'°o A gv�\/'`�\ \/\\ \ \ A o tk./wo a 1 0oA\ 0/° o j�7.�o6o 0 \ � 101 \\0/\ 1 ° \ o 070° / .O p o tk o oe °\\ / / ' I � \� 1019.00 � 2 10 / ID / I o0 14 _ --STOP SIG 7° 0 =L---------J L------0_/� \/- oo --� / - --/ - 777 - 0- 1-1/ \c / OP BAR °o oo 1017.00 0°'p --4 �00 CD <<0 010 13 _ \ O 12 /1o>>°s os, D 70oo. O ' 700. '13 \\ \ �6"4( O / °°6 /0° 998.6 2 FB o15 2 1007.6 �' 14 20.0'DRAINAGE 3 AND UTILITY EASEMENT 4 15 � A V A\\�- / o\ oo 20 16 � O 01910.0' 17 (TYP) 18 1008.60 O V\\•w oo. O `Qe 0 I 1007.E0 1007.7009p0 oWO 1007.60 WO / Ioe a WO o / 1007.60 0 I 0>000� o I I rin I / /JIIII I 9/ \ / / III III I STOP SIGN / L - - - �/ \ � \ �° 0° \ //� -_- - - --------I O z° \\\\ / LEGEND E \ , \ \\ s \/ I / - - STOP BAR ° \co 0 c c i -2 - - ------0.0'DRAINAGE-- - o \ \ 50 \ \� 7 -c I ---- -- -- - _ AND UTILITY o \ o -- EASEMENT 1009.E I 1010.00 I I 1008.10 o I I o a FB/LO I FB/LO I I I I 1007.400171 I I II I `B�O1016.6 \ \\1\16 \ WETLAND 8 FB/LO 1016.4 1016.4 FB/LO 10164 FB - - HWL=1018.5 1016.4 /Vol \ 0 1 i I 2 i I 3 I I I I I 5 \\ 1\ \ �% y/ -/ WETLAND 7 \ L------- I I I-- - I I II I �T HWL=1017.9 U \ - I------- I I I 4 ' WETLAND 5 / 3 I II I / / HWL=1019.1 / L----------- �--� / � I d �� ° E U O a PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK LINE PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 z O I- C) N� L.L VJ z O U L.L O ILL I- O z Q z_ J ILL] LO z J i w Q z O w 0 z a Lm Ob z W Q } LL m O W �azQ Qzo� 04 dOincn za j,lF o aaao of OZ ~~ F W U J Q O J Q W W W W J n _U2 0 J F = O } Il O�J W U 04 I 2 o U ~ � Q = Q 00 0 mCQW0 W-O-zz bi o -U):w2 z o m U p w U) O X o U) X Q ti Q 00 m d X m o = X O 00 W z z Y c� Y � Of U 0 z Q W D, z 0 w L.L. O L LJ L L] C) uj L.1_ Lu I- W V Q z m Cz G Q z_ 0 W 2 SHEET NUMBER C2.0 -. O rn N 00 O N OQ O U) Q Z Q J CD Z 0 Q CD O U a) a) Cn 0 Q U a) 0 a) O a) a) cn a) 07 a) ++ O L_ m O U) i a) O L_ m O W 0 J UI -04 U C GRADING PLAN NOTES PROPOSED FINISHED 4 CONTOUR U 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY a OF MEDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. BLOCK # 990 LOT NUMBER a 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 PROPERTY ^ EXISTING CONTOUR II ° AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO LINE `i' � EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. ° 7 EXPOSED OPENINGI 3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS 990 ELEVATION FULL BASEMENT (FB) ' FUTURE E OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE LOWEST FLOOR RECOMMENDED LOOKOUT (LO) - Y START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY ELEVATION I 1007.60 HOUSE TYPE WALKOUT (WO) g 08 o NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR I I 1°p2\pp4 1p0 10 P H A S E VARIATIONS. WO SUGGESTED GARAGE ^ 007.60 o LOCATION STRM - 101 7 ° 4. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER \\ ' EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO \ \ 10og 5o FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION \7♦'I WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE ALSO GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION / \ ✓ ' 0 MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION FINISHED ELEVATION ( ) ESHALL BE XISTING PAVEMENT. PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF AT LOT CORNER - - RIGHT OF WAY / \\ 1p0850 °c 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND CD CENTERLINE STRM - 102 III STRM - 106 N VERTICAL CONTROL.- 9 100' CENTERLINE STATION \ 100 \ \ STRM - 105 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. \ \ •�: S'. \ i 26+00 EVP I 26 671 a 7. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL TYPICAL SINGLE FAMILY LOT GRADING DETAIL ► \ \ \,%� 6° Opp! \ \ / _ ,0�-017.69 ° ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET B 1�, 10 ° READY FOR SUBBASE. I / , 7 9 1.7 ILI I 1019.50 0 8. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, \ / �0°600 \\ // / a ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS - - - - - - = SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE / \ / \ 1015.7 DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. / \\ OS,` I I I I \� o Y 9. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING CONTRACTOR \ 98` /' \ \ \ ,`'•- 0° O� / I I rn I 6 / � SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL / / / � / � i � \ \ '• �00 STRM - 103 /\- c DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE -VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" 6 OF TOPSOIL. '°o \ \ ✓ /,_ ,�\ \ \ / OD�>'0\\, \\\. / / / 1013.4 9t�\ o �/� v \ V / o VA� o I - $ 10. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING !7 J \ \ \\ / \ / / / L O \ \ I I 1007. a° CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA �\ °0100 �, \ - �. \ \ .,\ , �� \ / - \ 0 0° 6 I I j Cl I I STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP 7001 \\ \ , J`✓r 0 �O 101 / STRM 104 \ '�� 1' ° I °+° ° SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL -0 �' \ \ \\\ \\ �p0 I I �O I N I 1019.0� _ a SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL / op 2 o LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL / �• <� / /h \ / �` / O. o .o ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) _ J 707,' o �; : 7 / // \ \ \ /t0 \ IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING - _ ` 70 / • 70 1 °070 xOp Q 1011.8 \ \ III 1 I I o ° DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL _ '� 1 07 0 / \ , I \\ \ 0 \ / / ',p OP \ \ 1014.5 \ I co o c� NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN 15+ 00s 0 / av O. STRM - 109 O o ° ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE 00 / / 0 / / III \ \ \ \ \ 10p6 - - o -o z -o _ -o J 3 ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 3 I I 4�� - - 10 / \ \ \\\ // -- - - - P V m W Q I 0 1011.E w HP:10 33.2 STRM - 107 ' A' 1 15 0 LP:1010.2 _ STRM - 108 s 11. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW _ \� 16*pp , '� 700 I O° . \ \ / / / 00 i \ 1016.1 I 3 POINTS. \\� �� \`\ \ / 700 I I �0°� •/ \ / � / `O \ \ \ / /, I o I 1012.2 Q \ ./ 100 1016.5 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL 1006E \ \� \ / O I 0 Nx00 1010.1 \ U I o ' I O 1 O. L 1013.3 \ \ p4 / ' tl E BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE ✓ 1008 \ ^O• �,,, I .�.�`.� O` 10,11 9 00 \ �0 ' -' N I 1017.00 0 U CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH1007.9 �O 70 �� I �i� - 0 0 ° ��� 8 0 O t 1007.9 \ / 0 '1 • \ \ STRM 116 0 ' . ° A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE 70� x �� �00 I �� ON m / / \ 0° \ / o' 1015.1 0 I DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ��� ��� �"•� �^OO � \ \ •22 00 / / \ \ ��� I � • �0 / / � ' o / / / / �O � \ / LP:1003.3 � oAREAS AS °0�L 1 I a SHALL DETERRECTED BY THE MINE NE WHICH SECTOILS ENGINEER. THE IONS OF THE STREET OILS R PARKING , �•00 / 087 992. t\ I 1 O� / / °s '`, \\ / / / \ \ 11 . 00 10 AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL ��� ��� \ `� I� 10 / �� \ / / \ ♦�% o L HP 1016.0 � � /a � 1005.E � o BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ��� 700 O \ ` i 20xo° / 1008.3 SOILS ENGINEER. \/ :'� �� ^ O _ \ 1011.1 \ / / 0�2 STRM - 111 \ Op \ \ 1po6 / 1004.E \ \ HP:1014.5 O o / \ 18+0 o`O 100 o \ / a III I :� \�00 100 19+00 \ \ \ STRM 115 / \ \ 12 \ _ E z o �00) . // / 1009.2 \8 s _� 1po i / / °'o . III I•° � ryco o III I /� ^N ' \ 1005.5 1005.4 1006.E Ot0 \ \ O \STRM - 212/ / Ov / � 1009.4 V / 1003.1 \ \ / � •v / I U I I•I / / o w STRM - 110 \ \ / O STRM - 213 III I / 0 ` .O� 013 '1 \ / / / n LP:1002.8 \ g0 p III I / 7 2� o 0 ^ °?s � \ / / / \ \ � 1006. _ / ° /1pp0 \$ f� 9g9'6 \\\ \ 0�6 r100E p\r, 005.2 .E 14 P.1014.6 \ \ o / / f.= IIIIII I'I `004.STRM - 113 /^ II .STRM - 114 \0) 01SB 9 S/TR/M - 21 3 ° 1012.0 1004 / LP:1002.3 \ \\ / 2 / / \ °� \ ` ' STRnn - 91a 0 HP:1004.1 O!. / 6 -0 STRM - 112i 15ppg� O1 I n Ip L.J III I I I I I I °o- III -+- I '°O� °°G I I EOF� ` HP:1004.1 �...- \ 0 '��`. \ \ • /� / / q�0 \ III I - - F� 1p06 \ ' 101°� \\ \ / p Ode. �0°`b \ \ / / 7 � L p 02 7, EO ��/ xo / 1016.2 / -orI I I LP:1002.6 1 16 oso Ip =i' III I I o � \ III III ly I h. I I I l ice. ` 1 1 pog oo \ \ , 1010 00 o /1ON,) 1 �� STRM - 210 1016.7 �\ III III I II Ison ._ iI loos I 100loss ON Now �loom- O� 1008.60 1007.7:eo1017.7 /101-1E HP:1014.5 10_0 e o ,11 ...% 1007.60 0090 c I III III h I I I 1 1007.60 I 1007.60 I 11007.70 I STRM - 209 o�, \ 10�6. `\ / STR 15 N III III I. I o I I o I I • III o k 10 1017.3 �`O ,,01E \ \ U � II III I I I t \ \\ P:1o12.5 z 1 / o - --- ----� t_ STRM -207 o - - ; - - _ E, ?� - - STRM - 206 - 1 I- I o2 \ /. - _ - - - - - - - STRM 200 - i :_ �, - Zp+O° 1016.4 O ` 1019.0 \ \ \ \ I 14+ O - - - - - 15+00 HP 16+00 . r �i \ 1017.E 0 \ 1016.0 A%✓/1� L - 016 17+00 1g+00 - LEGEND 1015.97 1016.90 - - ��_ - � � STRM 216 0 \ 101 101 91 1015.4 1018 O \ � 0 \ \ / PROPERTY LINE -, -_ Q� m GRADING LIMITS 1016.E 1017.0 M 16 \ EXISTING CONTOUR 1016.3 - 1016.1 1° 1016.3 0 7 � 1018 1018 - - - - - � � HP:1018.1 923 PROPOSED CONTOUR L - _ - 1015.1 1014.2 _ STRM - 208 1014.4 1016 - - 1014.4°n, \\ 009 y° \\ \ \ \ / / / 7 O PROPOSED MANHOLE O a CD o 1015.4 1 \ 6 o - c6 o I 0 1p16 0 \\ 1009.E I 1009.E 1010.00 o I I 1008.10 �' I I o `0 10og 50 a 1018 FIRM)I I FB/LO X 1016.1 0 1008.10 I 1007.40 ' I �BI`01016E \ \ 06.4 164101(.4 I I ^FB/LO c co 1016.4 �171 01I 1 1016.4 101 I I \ 1 ° .7 �i LI 1 1016 I. I HP:1014.4 10 4 a LP:1012.4 j I LP:1012.4 2 I 1012.7 LP:1012.2 EO � 1014.4 HP:1014.4 1 1014 I � a I 1014 E F -- 1p14 -- I I L- �014� I- HP:1014.4 I 1014 1 U ,�1012 - 1p14 I G LP:1012.4 \ EOF < <� �J __\ raft 3 STRM - 201 m war0�= EOF- STRM - 203 ADJUST EXISTING STRM - 202 1018 _c STRUCTURE I- - / PROTECT EXISTING TREES. NO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED. WETLAND 5 HWL=1019.1 f i .1--/ 1 / / / WETLAND 8 HWL=1018.5 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN U PROPOSED STORM SEWER 923.00 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION O HP PROPOSED HIGH POINT LP PROPOSED LOW POINT EOF EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION I- 923.00 O DRAINAGE ARROW z `I /N L.L NORTH z 2 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET J 0 25 50 100 mow/ L.L Z O (n LLJ m O IZ Z J O U Z co=Tmc~n Q U N - O O w m U 5 � Z vi Df U � O p co 2 44 L Z J of � OW Z Y z z O Lu LLI > Y � w NN O z o 0 N r w m O W<-w 04 az0� u- 0 (f) N W w zajwF o a aawo C2 oz 2 - 0 U m z U ~ o F U) Q U J Lu 0- J =WLuww w r- U2 } 0 J F = Es w O J W 04 F Z 0 z O co < of o - 0[if 0 - z z bi co :E f=-w2 z o m U p w 0 O X H o U) x Q r` Q m d X m o o w z z Y c7 Y w 0 U z 0 L L] 2 z L O L LJJ / 7Q Z �W W U) ui Lu (- SHEET NUMBER C3.0 O rn N cij N 00 O U) Z J Z W W CD Q z Q W Q O U co 4-1 a) O7 O Q U U) a) 0 O N O N cn N U) i N L O L- m O U) L- a) O L- m O W 0 J UI -. c 0 a / � I Q CLEANOUT TC:1006.5 ' II CLEANOUT IE:1001.36 - Y - TC:1004.5 - - , FUTURE - / -- - IE:1000.9 - - - //\ A P H A S E o � STRM -� 1/ ° `\ 9 1I II I M I I I O / /// \\`\ 1p0g50 I II I I I �n \ , I w WO � I STRM - 102 \ \ ♦♦ / CLEANOUT- _ / \ �0 \ STRM - 105 CLEANOUT I \ TC:1003.4 \�\ - D TC:1005.1 I \ IE:1000.4 O 0� \ \ �i /- - - - - - - I o \ IE:991.56 I \ O <9� 26+00 - I 26 67 I I O ° �( CLEANOUT ♦ / `' \ B Op15 I Z ° /A 1 rn TC:997.3 f CLEANOUT 7 9 1.7 / - `" I i 1019.50 o A I a I / IE:994.3 / TC:1002.1 B I v B I o t / \\/ IE:991.75 \ �/ Oo6o \ / /------- - I I o n \ Tom. \ o �, I 15 1 1 z o I I I Lm E // \ \ CLEANOUT �� / / / \ \ O �' / I I I O / CLEANOUT i p �O / Y \ TC:998.8 - i A \ p6o t B �/ III I I I O \ \ No STRM-103 / I 1010.00 I I--- - - - - - - - _ A 1 � ^IE:993.8 ''r � IE:992.01 O // / °° \ / \ \ ° \\ \ / / / / / Leo III wo I - - - - - - - - D LU o / �001� ` 0 1007.60 1019.00 I I STRM - 108 U c`\I\I r` O O 00 / / �` CLEANOUT / , \ O� \ ✓ / / \ \ 1 po I o I O w rn U a 1007. \ CLEANOUT , �..,� TC:998.4 , / \ \ O O �0 / /STRM - 104 �p0 16 I I +m 1 cn ~ \\ O 0 c� 1019.0 o A CONNECT DRAINTILE Q 00 / / A \ \ TC:998.8 �` IE:992.5 ^�`� \ \ 0�0 � / \ \ N° I I I I IE:1006.7 0 .0 _ 00 / / 2 \ IE:993.3 � i� i \ \ '�° / / / / O0. \\ III 10 I o Z � } i / / / \ CLEANOUT i \ A Oo \ / / / S� \ \ CLEANOUT I I CLEANOUT I I 14 z : 10c =� - J ` // / f� 70pJ °° / \ 1-1 TC:998.6 \ ` \ �po5 \ / pp O / O� \ \ TC:1005.0 III TC:1009.5 I I r I I O w z Y 70 O 0 /\ \ / / x IE:1002.0 IE:1006.5 I = O o =� / / / O 0 \ IE:992.9 \ / L \ A O I z �Oo / / 00. STRM - 109 / 2 O \ \ O \ \ I I I I I o l w Lu a / 3 I°° 4 \ \ �OoO t0! /!� / \\ \ �O pp16 \\ \ /� -----J T I --- ------ -- CLEANOUT o / I \ p3 / / \ \O \ \ \ A / °° - TC:1012.2 Y � \ ^O A III \ �° / �.� / \ \\ CONNECT DRAINTILE \ \--------- - - - °---IE:1009.2 � r \\ \ ls*0o �� \ \ "O �0070 I I A p�00 \\ / / / / / / Oo \\ \\ IE:998.9 \ / / / I I I I EO > - \� \ 0 I �o \ /i / �o \ / I z / ✓A %\ ^O I I O 0� \ /�/ g \ pp \ \ / / A I N I 1017.00 0 / I c`Lo 1I ° No I Op o� / \ p5 6 \ - / / / oo I I o / O a llr l / \ 7�%00 / / \ p \\ \ STRM 116 / �. 7 I '� • / '� O� o 0 00 III ,�po ° O / \� \\A\ A / / D / o oo��o� l I \\1 ``\ III / B I 992. I / Os. \ / I -n I o \ �� STRM - 111 / / \ \ / } ,� llll l 70o O ���i i 7 2oxo°/ �/ 7 / / A \ \ oa' / �� I owcz N V /rr / 's /l �e �� / CONNECT DRAINTILE ' B \ 6 \ \ / / \\ \ / / / / CLEANOUT a z O / O / IE:998.1 \ p03' 6 \ A / / \ / TC:1014.2 z a w = o III I I a O '� / / \\ \ '� O p01 2\ \ / 1 \ \ �� �� IE:1011.2 Qc��O~ z III l° �I ,00 // / \\ y� _ g 19+00� 'r // \\\ \ \ \ // /// \ \ 12 \\ B oo // I <=ao m o - III I ° / / ` -I / \ G \ \ x �o\/ �, o z �� _ ��Q 2� o III I.iI II // ^`y �\' - C� Ot0` \\ \ �O \ / \\; �0°16 \STRM-212/ / o / // / ¢awww w III I: / O \\ \ 6 / / \ \ �=-- Q o ° II II / / STRM - 110 - \ \ / D / \ \ \ \ / / STRM - 213 CLEANOUT } o } = N III U III I / / 70, r- \ �\ �� \ \ // < B 0cp. \ /i p /TC:1015.1 o o o III 1 I 1 / / I \ �Oo O 16 \\ A / \ \ s� / 6 I E:1 12.1 w O w o � I �e�. \� X� No° \\\ / / \ 13 ^\ \ 6ao o� ,, / 0 Q z o III III I II // / s 0 /// I I o \ \ \ \�/ / // \ \ STRM-115 \ �o° / \ / w�wQW° (r U � Z z lii III III I I / / / / 998.E o I I \ / // \\\ o / �\ / / ww�QC9 F- a III 1 I \ / \ $1 \ \ / / �O,o / I =D-w=zz < \ 0 / / O / _cn�t-w2 o III / / / L / A \ \ �o \ xo , \ III III I I A / FB I I 9g9 \ 5 / \ \ \ / A / 3 L// Z // 1 6 A v z co IIIU III I I 1007.E I I F Aoo, \ �� \ \ / / 1-1 ` 1-1 O W A / / / 1 / \ 14 � \ p / / ` CLEANOUT U = III ° STRM - 113 I STRM - 114 / / / i \ \ p$1 STRM - 211 / / \ / TC:1013.3 � X L7 3 III rrij III I // / I / / \ \ SB 9 \ \ �0 / cb0 \ IE:1010.3 O X ° III ::. CLEANOUT ° 1-:1007.5I 4 , D A \ \ 0 1012.0 \\ \ / O. 1 \ \� ` °° X Q Q m m o // 3 1 \ ,gyp \ / O po v a X o 0 0 } m IE:1004.5 A / A I I A - - / \ \ \ �0 \\ \ / / % / / \ \ `O �C v ` I = X o w z z Y -, - / \ Y w U •-� I I D I I - - L / / , / \ B \ O!. \ \ / / / \ \ / STRM - 214 U w _ a I I I CLEANOUT I I STRM - 112 \ \ 15 %� \ O 0� \ \ / / / \\ \ 16q,0 / (n U III «� III I I TC-1005.2 I I A ,, ��,,` I I--- L o o / �o 1 \ N -T- I IE:1002.2 I g A ��\ \\ \ 1p°g. / 1-1 a III 1; I I CLEANOUT I I , \ 10 \ \\ / B / O 0$q,0 \ \ / / ° III f-- 111 1 I TC:1004.1 I I D ' 1 1 10 \ \ / / x00 d�. �o \ \ A / ° I I IE:1001.1 ,q \ \ / 2 / \ rt v \ \ C/1 III �i; III I 1 I I 20 I I III 1 % 1 16 / \ \ O \ \ / /� % / / \ \ O� \ \ / /SB 1 / B CONNECT DRAINTILE III =i: II I I I I I 19 I I A I I g 1 1 / / \ \ �0 0 �; \ \ \ / ` / P��, / / \\ \ 5 \ \ \ / / 1 8 IE:1008.4 III III I' 11 I III III 17 1 1 / o0 10 �° 111 III I ;II I IE:998.1 I I 18 i I I 1 \� \ STRM j 10 O 09�0 _ CONNECT DRAINTILE 1009 / 0 T I III III I I 1008.6o III �I 1 1 o \ \ xoo �.��' / 10 O \ \ A III III I1 I 1007.60 I I I 1007.70 1 1 Oo o \ � . \ \ w ° I III 1007.60 I 1009• a I I III III 1. I I WO I I wo I I ,/�, I I wo 1 1 0 J III III I � 1008.60 I I 1007.60 o III Y Y O I 1007.70 0 - , - 010 I 1 I 1111 III h �P I o I I O III 1007.6o II I I 0 0 1 11 STRM - 209 �,� / / / ! \\ / Ip III L I I o I I I 1 1 z III III I.1� I I I I I III 1 1- ' ' 21koo B \ �` \ \ \ A 9 D - - - I - 1pn�0 \ _/ STRM - 215 LEGEND 0_ J I- I $ STRM - 206 - - - - - - - t_ STRM - 207 ' / / `\ \ �0 G� 1p2o�0 \ \ \ / ' - - PROPERTY LINE _ STRM - 200 - - _ - 20+p0 i O g CONNECT DRAINTILE _ - - - - / IE:1009.0 GRADING LIMITS - - - - /X.- 14+ 0 15+00 16+00 �0 \ \ $ \ \/ EXISTING CONTOUR " - - - - 17+00 19+0018+00 STRM -216 p \ A / 923 PROPOSED CONTOUR - - B - \ p30 \ / CLEANOUT O PROPOSED MANHOLE TC:1016.0 - - \ PROPOSED CATCH BASIN E. STRM - 20 �� ' ' 1 � `\ �� \ \ °° / > PROPOSED STORM SEWER u) Q �� / L B _ B STRM - 208 I 1 \ % / / PROPOSED DRAINTILE z - - - - - - - - - O 1 GjO \ / / \� / / PROPOSED STORM CLEANOUT O 100g. O \\ A ``\ �/ CLEANOUT � Q �_ I o o I I , o 101E 60 \\ / �\ TC:1017.8 U W / IE:1014.8 / / O / CLEANOUT KEYNOTE LEGEND 7 1009.E L a I 1008.10 0 1008.10 I 1007.40 I `O 1 6/ / TC:1017.5 O N F B/LO I F B/LO F B/LO I I F B/LO I I I 0 I Fg� 101E 6 11 A -° \ // IE:1014.5 O PSUMP PE SHALL BE INDICATED A 2XX2'WWOOD POST. 4" HDPE 5' INTO LOT. END OF C 1016.4 1016.4 1016.4 I I 1016.4 I FB/LO I Ir13 I I 1 -/- �-__ O G I I 1017 1 1 / CLEANOUT / B (4) 10 LF 6 HDPE DRAINTILE (SEE DETAIL) a .7 I 1 I I I I 1016.4 i I II A 1 `1 TC:1015.9 o,/ O O Q ° I I 3 I A I D ���� IE:�012.9 WETLAND 7_ / CONNECT DRAINTILE / Q Q I �- - I I I A I I I I HWL=1017.9 z o I EOF L--� `" --I I --- -A----- - - - I I I 1 1/ IE:1008.6 W W t EOF �� �'� �` \- D < lftftft I < < I D II' I B -1 STRM - 204 ' V ) 3 STRM - 201 I STRM - 203 I , - - -� t/ WETLAND 5 W ADJUST EXISTING STRM - 202 / HWL=1019.1 NORTH Q � STRUCTURE B - - - - - - - ui o L- B ��- / - 2 OGRA PHIC S5AOLE IN FEET J 100 PROTECT EXISTING TREES. w SHEET NUMBER N NO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED. � i � 3. O O7 N 00 O N as O 41 V) Q z Q J J_ F- D J J Q W O 1 O Ln U V) a a) U7 Q U V) a) C) O a) O a) a) cn a) Ln a) O L m O Ln i a) O L m O w 0 J UI -. c 0 0 a 0 0 T E Y 0 0 0 .3 0 U 0 0 0 a 0 0 T 0 E Y 0 O a 0 a a a c 0 0 0 0 N `0 7 a C 3 0 0 3 E U O a iE 0 0 a� a 0 E a c 0 ry 0 0 a p 0 a a 0 3 U `0 c a N 0 a a a C) U 0 a 0 `o T O a 0 a c ai U 0 0 Lo 0 0 c a a a 0 U) a 0 U 0 O U t Q) 0 0 a SANITARY SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO. STRUCTURE TYPE SIZE CASTING SSWR - 01 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B* SSWR - 02 STUB N/A N/A SSWR - 03 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B" SSWR - 04 MANHOLE 48" O R1642B* SSWR - 05 MANHOLE 48" O R1642B* SSWR - 06 MANHOLE 48" O R1642B* SSWR - 07 STUB N/A N/A SSWR - 08 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B* SSWR - 09 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B" SSWR - 10 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B" SSWR - 11 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B* SSWR - 12 MANHOLE 48" O R1642B* SSWR - 13 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B* SSWR - 14 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B* SSWR - 15 MANHOLE 48" O R1642B* SSWR - 16 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B* SSWR - 17 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B* SSWR - 18 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B* SSWR - 19 MANHOLE 48" 0 R1642B* SSWR - 20 MANHOLE 48" O R1642B* SSWR - 21 MANHOLE 48" O R1642B* UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 OR DUCTILE IRON CLASS 52 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 1" TYPE K COPPER OR SDR 11 IPS PE IF NOT USING DIP WATERMAIN 4. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 5. ALL STORM SEWER LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE. 6. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 7. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 8. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF T-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 10. IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET - - - - - - - - - - - ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A STRM - 106 I I MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR I I ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 7�� I SSWR-14 ooeL _, I STRM - 107 I I 11. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE / • \ / / \ i - - - - - - - , I I n I BACKFILLMir' 0000- SSWR - 02 �` - \ \\ \ STRM - 103 v SSWR - 13 ISTING I YDRANT EXISTING SANITARY / / •��`* / HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE / / / STRM - 104 2 ��/ \ `\ 5 8X6 TEE // \\\ I I 10 �/ REMOVE AND SALVAGE / \ \ / / / \\ I - a. / EXISTING HYDRANT GATE SSWR - 12 \ \ 9 VALVE AND REDUCER AND / I I \ \ / I \ \ �1-------- CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB 100, -_ - - 4., HYDRANT //// I I 4 \ � 6" GATE VALVE I \ \ 8X6 TEE / / III \\\\ // \ /� / \\\\\ \) / SSWR -08 .� \`/ / III \ \ \ \\\ g N- \ I I STRM -111 // .000, SSWR -09 '% \ \�``� \\� \\ 7 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE / / / \ \ \ \ / / ✓ \ \� \ I III / OVER EXISTING STUB. \ I I / \ \ \ \ / / L / / \ \ 12 \ STRM - 212 FIELD VERIFY LOCATION III AND ELEVATION i WR - 11 \ / SSWR - 10 - �� / A SS \ \\ 6 / / / \ \ \ HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE 8X6 TEE 13 III III I I / / STRM -110 \ \ \ \ / / / " \\ STRM - 115\ / L 5 STORM SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO. STRUCTURE TYPE SIZE CASTING STRM - 101 FES N/A N/A STRM - 102 CBMH TYPE 2 48"0 R4342V STRM - 103 CBMH TYPE 1 66"0 R3067V STRM - 104 CB TYPE 1 2'X3' R3067V STRM - 105 CBMH TYPE 1 48"0 R3067V STRM - 106 CBMH TYPE 1 48"o R3067V STRM - 107 CBMH TYPE 2 48"0 R4342V STRM - 108 CBMH TYPE 2 48"0 R4342V STRM - 109 CBMH TYPE 1 48"0 R3067V STRM - 110 CBMH TYPE 1 48"0 R3067V STRM - 111 CBMH TYPE 1 48"0 R3067V STRM - 112 CBMH TYPE 2 48"0 R4342V STRM - 113 CBMH TYPE 2 48"o R4342V STRM - 114 CBMH TYPE 2 48"o R4342V STRM - 115 CBMH TYPE 2 48"0 R4342V STRM - 116 CBMH TYPE 2 48"0 R4342V STRM - 117 CBMH TYPE 1 48"0 R3067V STRM - 200 EX MH N/A N/A STRM - 201 EX MH N/A N/A STRM - 202 CBMH TYPE 2 48" 0 R4342V STRM - 203 CBMH TYPE 2 48" o R4342V STRM - 204 CBMH TYPE 2 48" 0 R4342V ! 0-� I SSWR - 01 STORM SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO. STRUCTURE TYPE SIZE CASTING STRM - 205 STUB N/A N/A STRM - 206 CBMH TYPE 1 48" 0 R3067V STRM - 207 CBMH TYPE 1 60" 0 R3067V STRM - 208 CBMH TYPE 1 60" 0 R3067V STRM - 209 CBMH TYPE 1 48" 0 R3067V STRM - 210 CBMH TYPE 1 48" O R3067V STRM - 211 CBMH TYPE 1 48" 0 R3067V STRM - 212 CBMH TYPE 1 48" 0 R3067V STRM - 213 CBMH TYPE 1 48" 0 R3067V STRM - 214 CBMH TYPE 2 48" 0 R4342V STRM - 215 CBMH TYPE 2 48" 0 R4342V STRM - 216 CB TYPE 1 2'X3' R3067V J I 00, / EXISTING STORM �ovvr - ul 8" PLUG >SWR - 06 \ I I I �+ r I - � i / I STRM - 101 STRM 102 8 \ \ SSWR - 04 \ \ STRM - 105 FUTURE PHASE I II I I I � I I I I ri I I I TEMPORARY HYDRANT I U GATE VALVE 8X6 REDUCER �t I HYDRANT 6' GATE VALVE I 8X6 TEE 1 15 I 12. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED i I I PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 13. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION I I I STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. II 14 LISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES.II 1 I15. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. I 14 I 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF MEDINA WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. - - - - - - - - - - - I I 17. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE I I I I FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS I BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 18. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR 131 I CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND /SSWR - 15 \� I ELECTRICAL PLAN. / I 21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. STRM - 213 22. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING \ 12 / SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN II �' II // / I \ / / / ' / \ / /� I AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE 2 I \ / \\\ \ \ WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF 20.0' \ \ / / / / \ \ 14 \ \ \ ✓ ` / \ / '� THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS 211 / / / I OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 3 I I �1 4 STRM I I L / \ STRM -114 LEGEND 15 � �, IIIIILTJ I I I HYDRANT 20 III6"GATE VALVE _1_ I1 I \ \\ \ \\ \ \ � / 7 / STRM -214 I R STRM - 112 16 8X6 TEE r- STRM -zoo I I 19 / Z 17 21018 STRM - 215 IIILIJ III I I I HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE 8X6 TEE III III I n I REMOVE AND SALVAGE II - III I I EXISTING VALVE AND REDUCER GATE I I 1 1 STRM - 207 \ / / / G l SSWR - 17 \\\\ 9\\ / / I II III I CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB I I I I \ / N \ \ / / _ \01 I ---------III----_-- I STRM -206 _--- ' \ SSWR-21 \ \\\ �/ � 0-1 i SSWR - 18 (EXISTING STORM SEWER I I I _ 4 g c II I, I EXISTING SANITARY SEWER STRM - 205 ' I I CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB FIELD VERIFY 1 I LOCATION SIZE AND INVERT 1 STRM - 201 1 I 1 2 1 1 3 1 -----_j ISTRM - 202 I 6 /. I o 00, 0000 / \ \ STRM - 216 \ \ \ / // _ - SSWR - 20 \\ \ \ \ 7 \ \ / / / STRM - 208 I \ \ STRM - 204 \ \ � j ✓ 1I SSWR - 19 \\ \\ \\ �\ / / / 6 1 20.0' STRM - 203 I I \ G / WETLAND 7 HWL=1017.9 �'. WETLAND 5 HWL=1019.1 PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 120 O IZ v Lo Z J D O U z oS c Lu Q 00 � 13 U N O O w rn U co O p co_ (D Z � J � LLI � O Lu z Y Z z O > Y � cp w NN @ > Lo N r w m o w wazQ azo� a0cn� �27)Ww zEL>LL o ;_a > LL ofo [L ~~ F W Q U J O J Q W w W W J I- _U2 }w 0 J F = N W O J w U 0�oz Of Oo U ~ � Q = Q alI D<wO o Cowr1f-O-Zz bi Z_ z 0 �: Co U p w U) O x H o U) X Q ti Q 00 m a X m m o z %< 00 o W z z Y 9 Y 0 w Of U J D Z J Q J J Z O W U i p ND L.L VJ Q Z O � U W � 2 Z LL I-LL O W Q z >Z olf �W W^ �./ / uj Q L.L Z W J W SHEET NUMBER C5.0 1 04 0 0 a 0 0 T E Y 0 0 0 .3 0 t 0 U 0 Q 0 0 0 T E Y T 0 0 6 a 0 S 0 0 0 N 0 0 .3 0 0 3 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 a E 0 0 ry 0 0- 0 of L 00 0 U 0 0 a O 0 U N a s 0 T O 0 ai U 0 c 0 E 0 U 0 0 a o� a L O U N 3 0 E U 0 ICI \ V I \ I \ 1007.50 \ STA: 0+81 \ \\� WYE: 1003.5 C.S.: 1014.5 7 \\ \\\\ STA:1+88 \ WYE:1004.5 \�\ C.S.:1015.8 / 1 11 1/4° 8" BEND STA:28+96.0, 7.6' RT 22 1/2° 8" BEND F 1 STA:24+72.2, 2.3' LT + �I \ I I 8" GATE VALVE STA:26+41.6, 0.4' RT STASSWR - 13 :2+85 / / 6 1004.00 \\ \ WYE: 1002.0 STA: 1+96 \ \ C. 1013.3 / / / -� \\\ / / 1007.00 STA: 0+55 WYE: 1000.0 \ \ 3x°° \ I WYE: 1006.0 Q / STA: 0+18 / / \ \ C.S.: 1011.6 \\\ / / / �\ \ STA: 1+31 C.S.: 1017.6 I / WYE:997.0./ / \ \\\ HYDRANT 6' GATE VALVE \ / \\ WYE: 1003.0 CS.: 1007.4 / // \ \ / / / \ C.S.: 1014.8 \ / 11 1/4° 8" BEND \\ 10 / SSWR - 0$ REMOVE AND SALVAGE 2 S \\ 8X6 TEE / / STA:23+24.9, 2.6' LTA \ I _ TEMPORARY HYDRANT \ \ TNH:1011.8/ S \ VALVE AND REDUCER 1001.00 / \ \ 1003.00 \ \\ .11/ X\ 9I - s AND CONNECT TO I A\ V A \ �; X°° <\ \ \\ I \ EXISTING STUB STA: 0+55 / / \�� I \ \ STA: 0+90 \\\ / ti2 OP► \ 1006.00 \ WYE: 997.0 / // I I \\ \ WYE: 999.0 \ / / / \\\ STA: 0+26 \ \ L 22 1/2' 8" BEND C.S.: 1009.1 / / 3 I I 4 \ \ C.S.: 1010.3 / > �� / \ \ WYE: 1002.0 \\ / STA:16+20.8, 11.5' LT I I \ ` / \ \ / js O HYDRANT �/ 1001.00 I I 1001.00 \ \\ /' / \\\ C. 1013.7 \ \\- \ 6" GATE VALVE / \ 8X6 TEE / STA: 0+40 i I I STA: 1+35 \\ \ / / / / / SSWR \12 g T�1H�,1010.2 / WYE:997.0 I WYE:1005001 � \ �,/ C.S.. 1009.1 i I I C.S.: 1009.1 SSWR - 09 \ / / / / \ > 8" GATE VALVE STA: 2+26 'D ,%�0 \ 45' 8" BEND I I / / / STA:21+36.1, 1.8' RT WYE: 1001.0 \ \ /' / STA:17+99.0, 7.3' RT , // {/ / � \ .:� • \ I I I 45° 8" BEND / / � \ � C.S.. 1012.4 8 GATE VALVE I I STA.19+ 66.0, 6.6' RT STA:16+45.1, 6.9' LT 11V \ \ STA: 1+19 �BX�o � /' \ \ WYE' 999 5 \ \ \ WYE: 997.7 C.S.: 1009.5 III I I 1 //�/ 1001.20 2 STA: 1+82 / WYE:997.2 C.S.:1008.6 1030 I WR - 10 3- / STA: 0+15 I I WYE: 994.6 I C.S.:1006.9 I , I 5 \\\\ C.S.: 1010.8 SSWR 11) STA: 0+19 \\\ 6 \\ \ WYE: 997.5 999.60 4 \ \ C.S.. 1008.7 \ \\ / / / . STA: 1 +19 WYE:995.6 C.S.: 1006.8 ASTER LANE PROFILE om w Z • TEMPORARY HYDRANT 6" GATE VArVE 8X6REDUCIR 8" GATE VALVE . STA:29+14.5, 7.6' RT r - - - - HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE 8X6 TEE TNH:1019.9 SSWR - 14 I LEGEND PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER HOUSE LOW FLOOR ELEVATION STA: 0+55 STA: STATIONING FROM DOWNSTREAM WYE: 1006.0 MANHOLE C.S.: 1017.6 WYE: SANITARY SERVICE INVERT AT UTILITY EASEMENT (10"BEYOND R/W) C.S.: CURB STOP ELEVATION NOTES 1. MAINTAIN 10' HORIZONTAL AND 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND SEWER. 2. INSULATE ALL WATERMAIN SERVICES 1030 U v o co Un O� m co r � rn o 1020 `� _zoo 1020 M co Ln rn m rn rn to > > z z m v Wct) O Z 0 ZC'4 cn > > 5 N � fn EL : Z ED v v rn corn m O fr ❑ o r z 0 � W Z N > > - z z m F W coW e Z co N M _ CNJ m co V M N 1010 0 (0� 6 N � c) m � mo rn � FINISHED GRADE 1010 M o z z❑ o Z 0 ❑J o Z 0 oLn � >OJ N >> >>j O carn� cn�zZm --- __ N�zz00 EXISTING GROUND co��ZZ ---__ zo J > _ � - co cf) O STA:21 +27.23 HYDRANT STA:16+38.52 II HYDRANT 1 000 LOWER WATERMAIN 1 000 TO MAINTAIN 18" I 4" INSULATION VERTICAL SEPARATION CgpO WATERMA 184LF 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.5 % I I i PVC 10701 F 3LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0. 0% I i 298LF 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.50°° STA:16+07.93 REMOVE AND SALVAGE TEMPORARY HYDRANT VALVE AND REDUCER AND II CONNECT TO EXISTING S FUB I II I 180LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.50% O 990 I I " PVC S R35@0.50% 990 II II 20LF 8" DIP @ 0.50% II II - 8" PVC 150LF SDR 35 @ 0.40% L� CONSTRUCT MANHOLE OVER EXISTING STUB. FIELD VERIFY DEPT LOCATION AND TYPE OF PIPE 980 980 LoU-) ti ti O O O O co co Lo Ln ti ti 00 00 00 00 00 00 m m CO c0 O O c'O C? 'zi: 111� O O G� a7 Lq Lq 7 7 ti f` cM CM O� O� CO CO 00 00 co co Lo Lo ti 1­ 00 00 O O N N co co Lo Lo Cfl CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21 +00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 HORIZONTAL 0 2.5 5 10 VERTICAL z 0 w O Iz L0 z J O U Q Z o_ Lu Q � � U N r O O W rn U z Qp co _ W L Z J Of w � O W Z Y Oz w w > o Q Y } H co o w ...�.� z o L0 L0 N m LL O w �¢Z Qz0i °-ocnU) W W � Z CL > W F a O 0 z W d a a 0 � z p � CO Z U O J ,0UZQ =w0,ww U 2 w _ � � ❑ J F = O �O��w U H Z ❑ p ❑z CD�o CwJ~ICU, <7) o BUD<w~O W � Q W (n O zz Lu LIJ =uaiz=w� 0 z o co 0 w 3 X r U) O X X cv Q cn Q m m X Q CC) p w m p X = o w z z w Y U W � 2 w ❑ ❑ U z >W W� v! Z W 1..� Z O - U Q ('v v J U) Q Z Z O U 0 w o 2i z LL LL O w Q Z Z �>/ L. `' W5W co // 0. L W Q 0/ z Tw y J ~ w SHEET NUMBER C6.1 O O ro 0 N I 00 U U) 41 a) N U) Q U U) a) 0 O a) O L N cn N I U) i 4-1 L m O U) L N O L m 0 / W 0 J I U / 1030 hill > 5 SIIU III �, LN_,` III `i� III I FIELD VERIFY EXISTING SANITARY SERVICES FOR BLOCK 2 LOT I I \\\ \ / /' / /' SB 9 \\\\ III I I 18,19 & 20 WERE CONSTRUCTED DURING PHASE 1 AT ELEVATIONS 3 I I , \� / / 'y 1012.0 \ \ ( III I AS SHOWN. CONSTRUCT SERVICES W/ SADDLE WYE IF NOT I 4 \ / V" \\ a- III CONSTRUCTED UNDER PHASE 1. 15 N -� � � _` I �� // III -T! III is i II I BLOCK 2 I - -��/ \\\\\ `j'y W l I III �i; II I I I 20 III I I 1 r \ \ \ 16 IIIIIIIIIIII -IIIIIIIIIIII I V II III I II II 19 IIIII \\\ \ \ \ .\ \\\\ \ \ \ STA: 1.0+096IEXISTING WYE: 1006.0HYDRANT I 17HYDRANT18 6" GATE VALVE STA: 0+93 C.S.: 1 17.8 8X6 TEE WYE:1005.0 11 / / ' / 1/4° 8" BEND / II III I I 1008.60 I I I I I I I TNH:1017.3 \ \ C.S.: 1016.6 STA:21+\8.5, 5. 1' RT II III I . I STA: 0+93 III 1007.60 I I 1007.60 \\ \ / • . \ III I I WYE: 1004.E I I I I STA: 0+58 \\ s/ I ( III III I I C.S.: 1017.2 I I STA: 1 +94 I STA: 3+27 � I II 0 I III WYE: 1003.E III WYE: 1003.E WYE: 1003.7 III - III C.S.: 1016.2 I I C.S.: 1015.5 11 1/4° 8" BEND C.S.: 1015.3 III REMOVE AND SALVAGE I STA:19+17.2, 6.7' RT \ \ t 21k00 / ` SSWR - 17 III TEMPORARY HYDRANT VALVE - - AND REDUCER AND CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB - - �- - - -� ►- - - \ _---�--- to SSWR 21 �\ 15+00 - 16+00 LI L I U M TRAI 17+00 8 I -- 18+00 11 1/4° 8" BEND STA:18+28.6, 5.7' RT 1010.00 � I i 1008.10 III 1008.10 STA: 0+84 I WYE: 1006.0 i 1 1 STA: 1 +80 I I STA: 2+97 C.S.:1017.9 I WYE: I WYE:1004.1 C.S.: 1016.4 C.S.: 1015.9 1 III iII I iBLOCK 3 2 1 i 3 --- -------IIL---- II--------- I FIELD VERIFY EXISTING SANITARY SERVICES FOR BLOCK 3 LOT 1,20 WERE CONSTRUCTED DURING PHASE 1 AT ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN. CONSTRUCT SERVICES W/ SADDLE WYE IF NOT CONSTRUCTED UNDER PHASE 1. 19+00 S _ 8" GATE VALVE \ STA:19+91.9, 1.2' LT \\ \ STA: 2+15 \ A \ \ \\ \ WYE: 1006.3 \\� - - - - - II II SSWR - 20 \ \\\ 1009.50 \\\\\ C.S.: 1018.0 7 SSWR - 19 III \ \ STA: 1+20 \ \ � � \ \ \ WYE: 1005.5 \ looe FIELD VERIFY EXISTING MANHOLE 1008.50 \ \ C.S.: 1017.1 \\ \ � / I 1007.40 II \ I STA: 0+18 \\\\\ 6 / I I WYE: 1004.5 STA: 0+23 \ I C.S.: 1016.0 WYE:1003.4 C.S.:1015.2 I II 5 I � I \ I WETLAND 5 � � � HWL=1019.1 LILIUM TRAIL PROFILE 1030 W CD M 1020 N Too M 0 N��m 1020 o'�z0 SCR wU) w� co Z m FINISHED GRADE o p M ON O- !n Z O O N C N O O~ - m 0' �zz00 ��Z00 I� N�ZZZ� co m II II III ui�___m I I REMCIVE AND SALVAGE TEMPORARY a 11 EXISTING HYDRANT I HYDR NT, VALVE AND REDUCER AND _Z > I I O 1010 I CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB �n 1010 IA:15+45.17 S w LOWER WATERMAIN HYDRANT TO MAINTAIN 18" STA:19+76.26 EX. WATERMAIN 14" INSULATION VERTICAL SEPARATION lol C900 WATERMAIN 1386LF 8" PVC FIELD VERIFY AND U GORE 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.50% MANHOLE. 225Lf 338LF-8"PVC SDR35@0.40° __--- - ------ 8"PVC SDR35@ .50°/. - - - --- -------------U91LF 1000 - - - - - - 1000 990 ----------- 990 00 00 O O O O O O CO CO CO (D 00 00 00 00 M M co co co M O O N N (6 O O (6 L6 L6 L6 L6 CD (6 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21 +00 LEGEND w Q R PROPOSED TEE Z PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) z O PROPOSED CATCH BASIN cn - PROPOSED WATERMAIN LLJ Qo� ► PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER -p EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 1010.00 HOUSE LOW FLOOR ELEVATION STA: 0+55 STA: STATIONING FROM DOWNSTREAM WYE: 1006.0 MANHOLE C.S.: 1017.6 WYE: SANITARY SERVICE INVERT AT UTILITY EASEMENT (10"BEYOND R/W) C.S.: CURB STOP ELEVATION NOTES 1. MAINTAIN 10' HORIZONTAL AND 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND SEWER. 2. INSULATE ALL WATERMAIN SERVICES GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 HORIZONTAL 0 2.5 5 10 VERTICAL z O U N� L.L VJ z O 0 olf LL O z Cz G J 'L.�rLJ Z O J U z oS U) Lu Q go U N °W 0 U zQ w O z } z Lu w - J Q Y w U Nw }LL 0 W �o < Qzo� d0cncn -<nW zaLu >LL aQ U) LOUU) 0�uwi¢ Q W W W W I}i0� W F z o K _O � 0 z U ~ 0 Q Q cLLJo W W 0 Q z =W��W 0 z Q m U J w Q U m 0 Z 2 04 N 0 z z U 2 J 0 N n O m L.0 Q 0 z 0 m U p w 07 O X o U) x Q ti Q m m d X m00 LLJ 0 2 %� O W Z z Y c� Y U w Of _ (n 0 0 U Z 3:4:::t W (1)� Z � J < w Z Q °6 U) z 0 LLJ 2z LL O LLJ Q 0� 0 LLJ LLI U/ ui 101L LLI SHEET NUMBER C6.2 -04 O O ro 66 O N 0 O 41 Q Z Q J Z_ NQ L.L W Q 46 w W 07 Q z Q U) I co U U) 41 a) N U) Q U U) N C) / O O L N U) N I U) i L 4-1 L m O U) L N O L m 0 / W 0 J U / c U O rn a 0 E O T E Y a 0 0 .3 0 0 0 V) a 0 0 T E Y 0 0 a 0 a a a U 0 C O N 0 0 C N .3 0 0 3 E U O a 0 0 U C 0 a a E a O ry a cl a a 0 3 3 `o U a 0 N O a a a U U O_ `o T 0 a a) a c Lo 0 E 0 0 1) 0) V) T a -moo 0 U) a Q U O U t 3 N a) 0 E U O a 14 / STA: 2+90 0� / / v / WYE: 1005.1 0 / / 13 C.S.: 1017.7 1010.30 / STA: 3+07 / WYE:1006.3 C.S.:1018.4 J !� 1030 A . Co \ 11 1/4° 8" BEND \\ \ r STA:28+96.0, 7.6' RT 4� / \ \ NYUKANI C.S.: 1015.8 \ 22 1/2° 8" BEND 8" GATE VALVE / \ \ 2 STA:25+23.1, 6.8' RT 8X6 TEE 22 1/2° 8" BEND / \ STA: 0+2 \ 0 � / \ \ ' TNH:1016.5 STA:26+13.1, 6.1' KI / \\ \ WYE: 1001 • C.S.: 101 f \ \ STA: 1 +74 // / � \ \ \ \ 2s*o0 2 / / 1010.00 \ \ \ JYE: 1005.8 / / \ \ STA: 1 +23 \ \ ;.S.: 1017.5 // / \ I - 26+00 / \\ \ WYE: 1006.0 \ \ / / \ \ � i \ \ C.S.: 1017.4 \ \ \N \ \ \ \ STA: 0+72 WYE: 1004.8 / / _ - _ - - / \ 1008.00 \\ \ \, 9 / / C.S.: 1016.5 /� SSWR - 16 SSWR - 15 \ \ 8" GATE VALVE I I V \\\\ STA: 2+15 \\ \ 14 / / / WYE:1004.0 \ 10 /// STA:25+48.6, 3.3' RT i� \ \ / IA ` 1008.10 \ \ C.S.: 1015.8 \N \ � I �; STA: 0+09 \\ \ \\\\ / / / / STA: 0+89 I WYE: 1004.1 WYE: 1003.8 I I C.S.: 1015.6 C.S.: 1015.4 13 I j \\\\ \ \ \\\ 11 \ \ /�.� / \ \ / LILIUM TRAIL PROFILE TEMPORARY HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE 8X6 REDUCER \ 8" GATE VALVE 000, \ \ STA:29+14.5, 7.6' RT\ ` \ HYDRANT `6" GATE VALVE \ �6X6 TEI \ \I1(bV1019.9 \ \ 5 \\ \ 3 \\ .000e i L S 1101 // "I "I // 1030 Lu Z Ln to v N N O00 Ln�- r e- T � .. 1020 ���o �Zzoo 1020 �J_ U)� �Lo co >>� fn�>� fnQ'ZCD 'O CD O cr) V) W'ZZC Lr) Ln V O Z) OO ~ 6 FINISHED GRADE a�z0p N�»5 ��?po fn0�ZZm ln�»� incl�ZZCo a z Fri HYDRANT w HYDR NT STA:22+04.77 STA:2 +18.76 U 8X6 RED. STA:2 +36.17 1010 LOWER WATERMAIN 1010 86LF 8' C TO MAINTAIN 18" 900 WATERMAIN VERTICAL SEPARATION 5L - 6" PVC C900 WATERMAIN HYDRANT STA:25+34.57 STA:29+53.33 4" INSULATION INSTALL SALVAGED 323LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.5 % TEMPORARY HYDRANT, VALVE AND REDUCER 0%1000280LF 11HE - 8" PVC SDR 35 0 1 000 990 ------------------ 990 0 0 0 0 0 0 �� co co co (D N N d d d: d: d: d 7 7 d: � ti ti � ti CO (o U-)Lo d d �t U) U) CO (D ti I- O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 • ort 29+00 LEGEND -D - 1010.50 NnTI=.q PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER HOUSE LOW FLOOR ELEVATION 1. MAINTAIN 10' HORIZONTAL AND 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND SEWER. 2. STA: DISTANCE FROM DOWNSTREAM MANHOLE 3. WYE: SANITARY SERVICE INVERT AT UTILITY EASEMENT (10" BEYOND R/W) 4. C.S.: CURB STOP ELEVATION 5. INSULATE ALL WATERMAIN SERVICES GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 HORIZONTAL 0 2.5 5 10 VERTICAL z O I- C) N� L.L VJ z O 0 0. O LL O z Cz G J 'L.�rL'I Z O J U a_ Z US 00 Q U N O ¢ U) o U) z w oLu } z Lu W G Y NN W r W m O W WazQ azo� dOLLI incn a�nU)W zajLL aQw'1W U)3jao U I-wQQ WUlow w W _ a_ U 2 �'OJI- WO��w I Z �o ofo�oz �U�Qw0 LLJ � W (� - z w m m Li Q z 0 LLJ o�z 2 04 N I 0 z of Z m z U U 2 J J w Q o U 04 00 I 0 O z =uai��w2 I o Z 0 Co U p w U) OX x �o Q ti U) Q 0 X m m 2 %� 00 Z m o O W z Y Y U w Of x (n 0 Q U z rQ V z 0 LLJ 2z LL O LLJ Q 0� 0 LLJ LLI U/ ui 0. Lu SHEET NUMBER C6.3 _04 00 O 41 Q z Q z NQ L.L W Q 46 >W W Q z Q U) co U U) 41 a) a) U) O / Q U U) N C) C� L O cn I U) i L 4-1 L m 0 U) N O L m 0 / W 0 J I U / c U O a a c 0 E O E Y a 0 .3 0 0 U O Q a 0 E i E Y 0 0 a 0 a 0 a U 0 O 0 N `o 0 C 3 0 0 .3 c O E O a 0 0 U C 0 a� a 0 E O ry a o a 0 3 3 `o U 0 N N 0 a a U U O_ 0 T 0 a a U O C E Lo 0 0 a 0) V) T a 0 U) a Q c O U t 3 N a) 0 E U O a ,� DI —0 / EXISTING HYDRANT i' A "'N 1010 / 1 / )WR — 08 \ / x / SSWR — 06 \ I \ SSWR - 05 \ II FUTURE \ 60 \ \ i 8 \ �2 \ `/ S9 / \ SSWR — 03 +cam \ / / // / / // /X 4 III III I 7 SS - 04 � / / I I 5 I I 6 III iIII III I I i I I I I III �,I I I I III III I I n III I�I III iIi \ / ", SANITARY SEWER PROFILE LEGEND Fq z • I —D 1004.00 I ritilrE PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER HOUSE LOW FLOOR ELEVATION 1. MAINTAIN 10' HORIZONTAL AND 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND SEWER. 1010 Z M M W �Lq0000 �00)HN ZOO N > > cnQ:??m wZ Z Lf) M / m _ M W r— 0) lf7 _ / \ O N �rnZ0p �� >> \ 1000 �EzZm 1000 / _ EXISTING GROUND / \ Lu co / N \vim / \ w Z C) Z r- CD ��Zo 001) / �cr)��� �- N�>� �� ` 0') it or) O0 fA2ZCO \ N�>> �>> � \ fn �'ZZ00 fnZZCO � 990 990 II m� N W 217LF-8"PVC SDR 26@0.40% v 193LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 980 I I ? � � DR 26 0.40% 20LF VC 980 SDR I5OLF - 8" PVC @ 222LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40 ° 0.40 /° 0 40 CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB. FIELDVERIFY LOCATION AND INVERT 970 970 f� I- 00 00 7 7 Lo Lo 1:T co (D N N ls7 U) U*) U*) O O co co O O O O O O f- I- O (6 6 I� ti 44 O O O N O O N 66 O O O 66 66 rn rn m O rn m O O m m O O m m O m 0 0 0 O CD rn O O rn rn O 00 rn rn 00 00 rn rn 00 rn 0+00 1 +00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 9+00 10+00 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 HORIZONTAL 0 2.5 5 10 VERTICAL z O U z O 0 0. O LL O z `}I Cz G J 'L.�rLJ Z O J U z 00 Q00 U N �\ o o u � Z Lu !Y O z } Z Lu w — J Q Y W r U w } ow m � w o < azo� dOincn Z .— aQH0- Ujao � M I-,- I W Q Q co,O w w _ �_w U 2 ��OJI- LLO�W �z �o �oawoz U ~ Q Z) Q W Of ¢ w O - z w 71 m z 0 w OIz 2 04 N I 0 z Q Oof z m z U U 2 J J w Q o U �j C) 0 I 00 0 O z =uai��w2 I o Z 0 Co U p w f� _ U) O X x o Q ti U) Q 0 X m m 2 %� 00 Z m o O w z Y Y U w Of x (n 0 Q U z Q Cn Q z_ 0 LLI 2z LL O Lu Q �z 0� 0 LLJ LLI U/ ui 0. LLI SHEET NUMBER C6.4 _04 0 00 O N 66 O 41 V) Q 01 Z Q Z O U (/) z O W W 46 Of >W W ch 0 U) U U) 41 a) N ° 0 Q U N 0 Ca) L O cn N U) L 4-1 L m O L N O L m 0 W 0 J UI -. I / / o�yI - I / BEGIN STREET CONSTRUCTION STA:15+86.36 Go 16x00 /416 7 \\ f J � I / / 2 1030 / / 000 / / I � / STIR M - 111 S \ \\ 3 I I STRM 110 4 i ASTER LANE PROFILE i END STREET CONSTRUCTION STA:26+43.96 I LEGEND DRN-TILE PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORM CLEANOUT PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED DRAINTILE NOTES 1. REAR YARD DRAINTILE SHALL BE 6" RIGID PLASIC PIPE. INSTALL 6"X4" WYE AND EXTEND 5' INTO LOT. END OF PIPE SHALL BE INDICATED BY A 2"X2" WOOD POST. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 HORIZONTAL 0 2.5 5 10 VERTICAL 1030 LOW POINT ELEV: 1001.89 LOW POINT STA: 14+09.28 PVI STA: 14 35.00 PVI ELEV: 999.00 LOW POINT ELEV: 1005.35 AD: 0. 8 LOW POINT STA: 1 +81.81 K: 37.7B PVI STA: 18+8 .00 PVI STA: 21+00.00 300.00' C PVI ELEV: 1004.79 PVI ELE : 1008.97 AD: 0.04 AD: 0.00 o HIGH POINT ELEV: 1008.22 K: 32.12 K: 130.34 o rn HIGH POINT STA: 16+76.52LO 120.00' VC 50.0 ' VC 0 o PVI STA: 16+50.00 M rn m PVI ELEV: 1009.00 0 o� o o M cR o W LO 1 020 U U AD: -0.06 m + cnr.- 1020 �� �6 LOc6 LO6 N ���LQ Ww 120.00'VC 00 mo 00 +o ui J -00 WwoW �j ii &iii Uju1 Ujw 0�m a iu U U U U U U U U M N c0 0 m m W w m m W w 0 0 0 DO co W W w-moo O + p c'') ce) U) z H W W h CD M 00 O) co u V U) 0: _ W "W W Oo ' N�00M U L) U o rn rn o 0 0° w w � W U)� ui ui ui ui 160% o � C/) Z rn rn rn O N 1010 ' oMco 1010 cn cn0,- I J J W LO O M -1.80 / cn1.94% �w ° an0w 188 LF OF 12" RCP @ 0.55° 149 LF OF 12" CP @ 0.55% 1000 1000 139 LF OF 24" RC O ° 113 LF OF 24" RCP @ 0.55% 182 LF OF 24" RCP @ 0.55% 990 990 980 LJ 980 O CD co co U*) U*) ti I- CD CD CD CD cn U) LO ti ti 00 00 co co 00 co m m m CA m m co co (D O M M 1:T 1:T O O m CA U-) U*) IT- T- ti ti co M m m � n-: CV fV (6 C6 00 00 C6 C6 L6 L6 ti ti 00 00 O O CV N M C-i L6 ui 6 C6 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O T- lr-" T-1 lr-" T-1 lr-- T- T- T- T- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21 +00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 z 0 w OIz Lo Lo Z J O U z c Ui Lu g � � U N O O W rn U < D z o u � b Z � J � w � O Z Y z Z ° 0 - J Q > Y � r U oN W @ > _ z Z) 0 N r m o w �aZQ 04 azo� aOcn� ��ww zajF o a aa"o of oz F~Q U =aWwwWUw2 J } � 0 J F = O LL O J W U 1 �z �o o K _o 0 z U~ � Q Z) Q alI CO < w o w-O-zz bi Z_ _0- wW� r=-w� U 0 W r = U) O x o U) x Q ~ Q m CL Xm 0 m o 2 %< O W Z Z Y Y U w Of x (n Q U 06 Z 0� O W 3: U W W D Z U) z (n U) oO z v I- �U U VJ Q z z_ O 0 0 w � 2z LL LL O W � Q Z Nz II..IL I '' ' W^, 5W ../ / W Q 0� 5z w G = J ~ w SHEET NUMBER C7.1 00 O 41 V) Q Z Q J Z 0 U Z 0 W W V / a' W W ch 0 I— U) I U U) 41 N N O Q- Q U N O N CIO I U) L ++ O L m O U) L N 4-+ O L m O / W 0 J I >U / c 0 U 0 a a c 0 E O _ I E Y a 0 0 .3 0 U 0 U 0 V) Q a 0 ;_ 0 ID E Y >_ 0 O d 0 a a a 0 N `o a C 3 0 0 3 0 E O a iE 0 0 0 a 0 E O ry a o 0_ 0 3 3 `0 U a 0 0 0 a a a .Q N 0 T 0 a a 0 C 71 Lo 0 0 a 0 0 T a -00 0 0 a 0 U O U t 3 N 4) 0 F U O a 1030 I ric — III sIIV — III III u.j III I co III > III 16,21 III I I I t+: L:J "i' I Ili � III STRIv, \ \ 15 III III I � l i III \\ s �y III III i I i I ► I I \ \ 16 � II III i 20 Ill 19 I I ► I \ \ \ \ / N i III III I III I l I 18 I 17 \ \ STRM - 209 II _III I I BEGIN STREET CONSTRUCTION I I I I II \\ 1 \\ o Ny III 8STA15+55.05 —- —`STRM-207 .0 A o L----------I W/\ \ 15+00 _ 16+00 17+00 19+00 _ — - —----�--_ — _ �— — 18+00 \ \ 4 \ 7 STRM - 216 STRM - 205II I ir — — — — — —I I I \\\ \\ \ \ \ I STRM - 206 M \\ / STRM - 208 STRM - 200 ^ 6 / \� �� I Ill III 5 _ `--- I i t 2 i t 3 I I 4 rt l STRM - 201 I l STRM - 202 — — — — I — — — — — — — I STRM -203 I I j WETLAND 5 HWL=1019.1 -00, LILIUM TRAIL PROFILE 1030 HIGH POINT ELEV: 1016.90 LOW POINT ELEV: 1013.91 HIGH POINT STA: 15+15.11 LOW POINT STA: 18+62.2 PVI STA: 13+69.00 PVI STA: 15+14.73 PVI STA: 18+65.04 PVI STA: 22+ 0.00 PVI ELEV: 1015.67 PVI ELEV: 1017.15 PVI ELEV: 1013.65 PVI ELEV: 1017.40 D: 0.02 AD: -0.02 AD: 0.02 AD: -0.02 40.33 K: 49.61 K: 47.15 K: 23.57 1 0.00' VC 100.00, VC 100.00, VC 50.00' VC W 10207;-,� z 1020 �� N�oco�� �� �� �� N� +vo r r vo r rW r6(0 +o 0 00 00 r r Lu > o+oo r r rno r r Moz CD M O N + o �20 N r { _o W (n U U Cn U U W H W W W U N > ENO N N N 4�'ci' W z� W (n U C (O 0 r (0 W (n U NON O r W HWW (n U U) 2' � > W W m in - - ; W W 2 0 mm N OO cal( 4- moo > W w �O��O >CO 1.02% 0 ��rr I- iu�jLli moo ���o tyro �iuwuiiLi N�--- ln � — — � Of iyj (jj 'n � LLi " 1, 2% I I II II II II -1.00% 1010 II II i i ii I II II � 1010 II w� I N°°00 I I co C6 CD II II F_ww OF 24" RCP @ 0.30% 144 LF F 24" RCP .30% 131 LF OF 24" RCP @ 0. 1 7 LF I 157 LF OF 24" RCP @ 0.30% i0/° II Ll EXIST. 24" RCP STORM SEWER _ — ----------- — 4 l-__________ ________— --- -------------Ll 1000 1000 990 990 co co co 00 O O O O O O CO CO (D CO 00 00 I- I� CDO 00 00 co co coco co co CDO N N N N CO CO CO CO (O Cfl ui LC) d d d L6 LC) CO CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21 +00 22+00 LEGEND Fq Z O DRN-TILE NOTES PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORM CLEANOUT PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED DRAINTILE 1. REAR YARD DRAINTILE SHALL BE 6" RIGID PLASIC PIPE. INSTALL 6"X4" WYE AND EXTEND 5' INTO LOT. END OF PIPE SHALL BE INDICATED BY A 2"X2" WOOD POST. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 HORIZONTAL 0 2.5 5 10 VERTICAL z O_ F_ U N� L.L VJ z O 0 ol. O LL O z Cz G J 'L.�LI z O J U z U) Lu oS 00 U N co O 5 co ¢ U) 0 U �¢ z 'w O z >- z w — J Q Y r U NN w — Q �! _ z o 0 N Ow m w �o < z azo� dOinu ���w zajF a<w02w U) It 0 Ix U FuQ QWUwww _ �_ U 2 ��OJI- I}L W F z �owoo zz ULLI H m Q= Q W of Co ¢ w U)-zw 71 m w Q z 0 w ofz 2 04 N O zLli =0- co��w2 1 0 z 0 m U p w U) O X x H Q ~ U) Q a X o m m m 2 %� 00 Z m o O Lu z Y Y U w Of _ (n 0 Q U °6 z 0� O w3: � w w � z Q �`n U) O p ~ U Q z 0 LLl 2z LL O LLJ Q > 10.N0 � L/LLI LLJ �./ / NW I..L Lu SHEET NUMBER C7.2 —04 00 0 41 V) Q Z Q z 0 U z 0 Ld Lv V / a- Ld W (/) ch 0 U) U U) 41 a) N O Q- Q U N O L N cn N Of U) L 0 L m 0 U) L N 4-+ O L m O w 0 J >UI _04 c 0 U O N a 0 E 0 _ I T E Y a 0 0 .3 0 U 0 U 0 Q a 0 a ID T 0 0 O a 0 a 0 0 a N `o 0 C 3 0 a 3 E U O a iE 0 U C 0 a� a 0 E O ry a o a a 0 3 3 `o 0 U a 0 Q) N O a a C) .Q 0 0 T 0 a a 0 71 Lo 0 0 a 0 a a 0 U) a 0 U O U N L 0 E 00 a 1030 STRM - 212 26+00 10 / / - _ STRM - 213 \ j 12 I LILIUM TRAIL PROFILE FIITII PHASE"', ';'' l'_x / le �x ' 9/' R21.0%, y� y / END STREET CONSTRUCTION STA:29+37.92 STRM-106 v \ 15 ^ \ r i 1030 HIGH PC INT ELEV: 1017.27 HIGH PC INT STA: 22+01.41 HIGH POINT ELEV: 1017.74 PVI TA: 22+00.00 +00.00 HIGH POINT STA: 28+89.35 PVI LEV: LOW POINT ELEV: 1013. 9 PVI S A: 29+08.42 -0.0 AD: -: 02 LOW POINT STA: 25+62. 1 PVI E EV: 1018.20 K:: 50.00' VC PVI STA: 25+69.64 D: -0.04 PVI ELEV: 1013.70 : 23.28 AD: 0.02 1 c 0.00' VC 00 K: 42.93 Lo N � 100.00, VC N� N N +o "* v,r-- N co Lo w co 6 L 1020 ;> �o �co cq Nw o�coM cq Nw 1020 _co �;��fi Z In Lo Lo (N O COO N� U> mm { HWLjj U> NL6ch cm Ujw w Ujw In LY—w Ljw o00 >> �c��(n >> It— Hwww 0 F m N O pV w w — �m�� 1.33% -2.9?% -1.00% LZ,�oo � WWLii 1010 1010 157 LF OF 24" RCP Ca OO 210LFOF24"R P@0.30% 1000 1000 990 -------------- D 990 I- Il- O O O O O O U-)m co (4 CO N N 00 00 N N d' d' d- d' d- d' r r d' d' I� I,_I� f� d' It I� (D co U-) Lo d d d L() Lo CO CO Lid L6 r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r r O r 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 LEGEND R z • DRN—TILE NOTES PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORM CLEANOUT PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED DRAINTILE 1. REAR YARD DRAINTILE SHALL BE 6" RIGID PLASIC PIPE. INSTALL 6"X4" WYE AND EXTEND 5' INTO LOT. END OF PIPE SHALL BE INDICATED BY A 2"X2" WOOD POST. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 HORIZONTAL 0 2.5 5 10 VERTICAL z O J z Z co c~n Q � U N °D QD ou U) z O z }Z ui L1J — J Q Y W cp w Z Ln N � w m 0 W �o < Qzo� °-oincn ���w zn jF aQw0 m�jaow � ~p U) Z Q W w W W _ �_ U 2 I}i0�� W F Z a0aoz U H m Q= Q Lu co W Q W O — z w 71 m LJ Q z 0 w UIz 2 04 N I 0 z Qof z m z U U 2 J J w Q o = N U I 00 0 I O O z =W ui2 I Lli o z 0 co U p w 07 OX X �� Q r` v) Q a X 00 m m 2 %� 00 Z m o O W z Y Y U w Of _ (n 0 Q U 06 Z 0� O W 3: U W W Z U) z (n U) O � Z v I I— NZ:) U U L.L VJ Q z z_ O 0 U w � 2 Z O LL Z N> z II..IL I '' ' W^, 5W �./ / ui 0. z w 2 _ J ~ w SHEET NUMBER C7.3 O QO I O N 00 O 41 V) Q Z Q z 0 U z 0 LLJ LLJ c / 46 Of L>�J Ld D7 ch O F- U) I U U) 41 a) N D7 O Q U a) 0 Ca) L O cn N I U) L 4-1 L m O F— O L m O H- W 0 J UI -. U C 0 U O a a E 0 T E Y a 0 0 U 0 U O N Q a 0 0 ID E Y T 0 0 O CL 0 a a a a 0 N O 0 C N .3 7 0 3 E 0 a iE O 0 a� a 0 E 0 0 N o' a p 0 a a 0 3 3 `0 U a 0 Q) 0 a a C) .Q 0 T O a a) a N N U N O 71 Lo a 0 a V) a a 0 U) a Q U O U (D L N 4) 0 E 0 a 1n?n \ ; m \ 6 \ \ \ Lw-- \��\ LEGEND o �> / / \ R PROPOSED TEE 8 \\� Z PROPOSED GATE VALVE 21 n STRM - 109 \ \ PROPOSED HYDRANT z 0 PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) cn LLJ PROPOSED CATCH BASIN / \ \ 7 \ \/ / / / \ \ p PROPOSED STORM CLEANOUT \ PROPOSED WATERMAIN i / \ \\ \ \ / / \\ \ ► PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER \\ \\ 6 \\ \/ \ / / \\�\\ \` DRN—TILE PROPOSED DRAINTILE z 14 \ \ NOTES STRM - 115 \ \ Pon � 1. REAR YARD DRAINTILE SHALL BE 6" RIGID PLASIC PIPE. INSTALL 6"X4" WYE AND EXTEND 5' 'o 13 \ \ INTO LOT. END OF PIPE SHALL BE INDICATED BY A 2"X2" WOOD POST. z 5 / / L / / \�\\ O z / 1-0 / / \ \ \ T oS U) 14 \ \ �■�. Q 00 \ U N r` O O W 0) 2 ~ V Z o \ STRM - 114 �\ \ Q w w \ \ \ Q� � w cJ G \�\\ 15 �\ ° w o \ \ Lu cp \ \ ON W O Z \\ \ ■ _ Z) O N I.n REAR YARD D RAI NAG E LOT 19 — 14 1n?n 1010 1010 �aW �o3:z W co W oZ� W �CD(nZ �Mo N o N M M O ' O M - 7 N r` °oM O O Oo r2 O O O OO 0) co t` I�� O 00 0 �� O Cn y� U)Ew 7 0) �LLJ�www � F-w w ��ww YI 146 LF OF 12" F DPE @ 0.5�%� / — 18 LF OF 15" HOPE @ / HOPE @ 1.00% 166 LF OF 15" 990 990 980 980 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 HORIZONTAL 0 2.5 5 10 VERTICAL 1 n?n LOT 3& 4 OUTLET 1 n?n 1010 1010 00 ocnco v,v �� din M O V �CD3:Z W %\ N� W w v~i�w N CDM O 0 0) \ \ / ►- W fn�w W W / / 1000 \ /' 1000 ------------ 0 155 LF OF 24' HOPE @ 0.55% 25 LF - 4^ RCP @ 0. 5% 990 990 980 980 } LL m O W w z 04 azo� dOincn � U) w W zn-5;W, o aaa"o of oz ~~ F W Q U J O J W a W w n UW2 } 0 J F = 04 O LL W U F Z O O �O�=z U ~ 0 Q = Q 0I0 m L)? Q W O O W - O - Z z =��f=-WZ_ 2 z o m U p w U) O X o U) x Q ti Q m cod X m o 2 X 00 o W z z Y Y U w Of x (n 0 0 U 06 Z 0� O W 3: U W W D Z z Cn U) 00 z v I— �U U VJ Z Q Z O 0 0 w � 2 Z LL LL O W Q z >Z mo0 I I' I'' ' W^, 5W �./ / '^w 0. 5Z w L = J ~ w SHEET NUMBER C7.4 O 0 ao I 0 N 0 O 41 V) Q z Q J z 0 U Z O Ld Ld c / 46 Of Ld Ld (/) m O U) I U i U) 41 a) a) O 0 Q U a) 0 a) O a) a) cn a) I U) L a) 4-1 L m O a) O L m O W 0 J UI -. c 0 U O N a a c 0 E `O I T N E Y O T O 7 O L .3 0 0 U O N Q a 0 ;_ O ID E Y T 0 0 O d 0 a a 0 a 0 N `o a C 3 0 0 3 E U O a iE 0 U C a� a 0 E 0 ry a p 0 a a 0 3 3 0 U a 0 0 a a C) .Q 0 T O a a N N U 0 Lo 0 a 0 a a 0 U) a Q U O U (D L N 4) 0 ;_ 0 a I I III I I III I I �Ilo II + O co II I I I III I I I III I I I I III I _ J I I III f 26+00 I FASTER ROAD I III I 10 I I I • I I I I I I III I . III I I I I III I i FUTURE I Pf�ASE � TTOO 26 67 M - 106 STRM - 107 STR I 0 I + 0')I I 15 N I I _ I I I I II I I I — — — — — — — - --, I J 0) STRM - 108 o co 14 N N � W �I I~ o I J_ J 1030 REAR YARD DRAINAGE LOT 15 1030 1020 w� O M M 1020 w w N�_LLI \ co CD 0 N co \ NC.p (O o 0 �w o0Z iu fA2uJ- 0 nor` 1010 -- 1010 98 LF OF 12" HDPE @ 0.55% 148 LF OF 12" HDPE ° @ 0.55 /° 1000 1000 990 990 0+00 1030 IN 2+00 I-------+� �< 16 II STRM - 208 I I I Ilil c 4 II II II / / / 7 6 I I 5+00 I 4+00 I STRM - 203 L— — — — — — — — — — REAR YARD DRAINAGE LOT 1 - 5 WETLAND 5 HWL=1019.1 I d. /..oe 1030 1020 1020 r w Z O N N_ N O � t` p CDO F- O O fq2' W W w N O M N�OO � w coO�M > CD co N�Q0 ADJUST STRUCTU E N mo � ��oc rn w ' N 6 2 RE=1014.4 N � LLI �000 — — N - yLU LLI LLI _ _ of W 1010 — _-- 1010 I 207 L F OF 12" HDPE @ 0.50% "HDPE @ 1. I =EXISTING 0% TURE 1000 1000 990 990 LEGEND R z O DRN—TILE NOTES PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORM CLEANOUT PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED DRAINTILE 1. REAR YARD DRAINTILE SHALL BE 6" RIGID PLASIC PIPE. INSTALL 6"X4" WYE AND EXTEND 5' INTO LOT. END OF PIPE SHALL BE INDICATED BY A 2"X2" WOOD POST. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 HORIZONTAL 0 2.5 5 10 VERTICAL w IQ (n Z 0 (n w U Iz z J O U Z z co Q � � U N � O O w rn U < z Z J O zw Y Z Z O d - J Q >� Y � U w NN _ z Ln N r w m O ll�azw Q � <, dOincn ��ww 0 zajwF Z a�aawo of oz F~ F W Q U J O J W a W w w n U2 = O 04 Il O�Jww U I �z �o m o K _o w 0 Z U ~ � Q Z)Q oo m? Q W O O w - O - Z z =�� f=-w Z_ z o m U p w U) OX �� v) x Q ~ Q m co a X m m o 2 00 o w z z Y Y U w Of x (n 0 Q U w Z 0. O W 3: U W W Z U) z Cn U) O� Z v I0 — Z:)U U VJ Q Z z_ O 0 0 w � 2 Z I— LL LL O W Q z > Z I Imo' I'0' ' W^, 5W �./ / '^uj 1..� 5Z w L = J ~ w SHEET NUMBER C7.5 00 O 41 O Q Z Q z O U z O Ld Lv V / m LLd W m O F— U) I U U) 41 a) N O Q- Q U 0 O cn N Of I U) i L 4-1 L m O U) L N O L m O / W 0 J U / STRM - 212 / 15 12 STRM - 115 STRM - 213 4-0 \ 17 "0 214 \\ STRM-210 \ / / 10000, / 10000 , \ \ STRM - 215 / Ole 005, 1030 REAR YARD DRAINAGE LOT 10 - 11 0 STRM - 104 IV II - ------------_-- -- — — — — — I I N I` 9 / 10 1030 1 020 LOT 7 & 8 OUTLET 1020 1020 >>U) M M� Z N M�� N N z z co7 M Zoo N�L� a'�OL0 N O�0CD LLIN�wLLI �{000 ���� 0 0 N�LLJ LU W to !n � W 1010 1010 249 LF OF 12" HDPE @ 0.44% 170 LF OF 15" HDPE @ 0.44% 5LF-1 RCP @ 0.44% 1000 1000 990 990 1020 W W ITchZ �> hCnZ(nz O N- O N I - V .- °0 N (h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 J co x W W W W _ - - I 1010 II 1010 25 F - 12" I I RCP @ 1.00% I I I \ 11 1000 1000 I I W Z oU, II N � � co co I wmm W I o � I Lo ch 990 'S4<F t� 990 111 F@38s - \ ° 53 LF - 30" \ HDPE @ 0.300A 980 980 LEGEND DRN—TILE NOTES PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM OR SANITARY) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORM CLEANOUT PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED DRAINTILE 1. REAR YARD DRAINTILE SHALL BE 6" RIGID PLASIC PIPE. INSTALL 6"X4" WYE AND EXTEND 5' INTO LOT. END OF PIPE SHALL BE INDICATED BY A 2"X2" WOOD POST. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 HORIZONTAL 0 2.5 5 10 VERTICAL z O U VJ z O U 0. O LL O z `}I /N L.L Q 5z L J 'L.�LJJ (n z 0 (n w m OIz z J O U z oS Lu g 00 � � U N O O W rn U < D z Q � O 04 2 z (.0 Lu Z � J � W � O Y Z z O d — J Q > Y � w NN ■ -- Z Z) 0 N } LL m O W 0<z 04 azo� dIs5, w W zn.j,lF o U) of oz F ~FwQ c5 2J O J W aw UW W2 w n }w 0 J F = O LL W U F Z :0::,� O �o�oz U ~ 0 Q = Q 010 m L)? Q W O O W — -- z z =Uz )w o z o m U p w r` _ U) O X o U) x Q ti Q m cod X m o 2 00 o W z z Y Y U w Of x (n 0 Q U °6 z 0� O w 3: � ww � z Q �`n U) O p ~ U z 0 LLJ 2 z LL O LLJ Q z N� 0. 0 L/L^J, LLJ � �./ / NW 0. LLJ SHEET NUMBER C7.6 _04 Agenda Item # 9D Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2017- RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR DEER HILL PRESERVE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, in 2016, the city of Medina (the "City") initiated a public improvement project consisting of constructing a road from %2 mile west of Willow Drive to Homestead Trail and a dedicated turn lane on Homestead Trail onto the newly constructed Deer Hill Road ("the Project"); and WHEREAS, by a petition and waiver agreement between the City, Stonegate Farm, Inc., (the "Owner") and Property Resources Development Corporation (the "Developer") dated August 10, 2016 and recorded in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota on August 26, 2016 as Document No. T05375399 and by a petition and waiver agreement between the City, the Owner and the Developer dated August 10, 2016 and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota on August 26, 2016 as Document A10349022 (collectively. The "Petition and Waiver Agreements"), the owners of the benefited land petitioned for the construction of the Improvement Project and the special assessment of their respective properties for 100% of the cost thereof, and WHEREAS, the Improvement Project has now nearly been completed and the costs thereof calculated and apportioned among the benefited properties in accordance with the Petition and Waiver Agreements; and WHEREAS, the Petition and Waiver Agreements authorize the City to construct the Improvement Project and specially assess benefited properties without notices or hearings as otherwise required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute a special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The special assessment shall be payable in full at the time of the Developer's sale of a lot to a builder or end user or upon and as a condition of the issuance of a building permit for any such lot, whichever is earlier. Any special assessment amount remaining unpaid on November 1, 2028, will be payable in equal installments over the following three years. All payments shall bear interest at a rate of 4.50% per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. All special assessments, including deferred assessments, will accrue interest in accordance with the Resolution No. 2017- September 19, 2017 City's policy on special assessments, which specifies compound interest from the date of adoption of the assessment roll. Such interest shall also be calculated during the period of deferral. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to November 15, 2017, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the city finance director, with interest accrued to the date of payment, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days of the adoption of the assessment. Thereafter, any owner may pay to the city finance director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The city administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this resolution to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Dated: September 19, 2017. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017- September 19, 2017 EXHIBIT A Assessment PID Legal Description* Amount 21-118-23-34-0004 Lot 1, Block 1 $29,512.20 21-118-23-34-0005 Lot 2, Block 1 $29,512.20 21-118-23-34-0006 Lot 3, Block 1 $29,512.20 21-118-23-34-0007 Lot 4, Block 1 $29,512.20 21-118-23-34-0008 Lot 11 Block 2 $29,512.20 21-118-23-34-0009 Lot 2, Block 2 $29,512.20 28-118-23-21-0004 Lot 11 Block 3 $29,512.20 28-118-23-21-0005 Lot 2, Block 3 $29,512.20 21-118-23-34-0010 Lot 3, Block 3 $29,512.20 21-118-23-34-0011 Lot 4, Block 3 $29,512.20 21-118-23-31-0004 Outlot D $147,560.98 21-118-23-34-0015 Outlot G $118,048.78 28-118-23-21-0006 Outlot H $177,073.17 28-118-23-21-0008 Outlot J $59,024.39 28-118-23-24-0002 Outlot L $118,048.78 28-118-23-24-0003 Outlot M $295,121.95 $1, 210, 000.00 Resolution No. 2017- 3 September 19, 2017 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: September 14, 2017 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates — September 19, 2017 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) Lunski Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, Site Plan Review — Lunski, Inc. has applied for approvals for a development of 90 units of mixed senior housing, 24,767 s.£ of office, and 4,100 s.f. commercial north of Highway 55 and west of Mohawk Drive. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the July 11 Planning Commission meeting. The Commission tabled the request in order to allow the applicant to update plans to meet comments from the Elm Creek Watershed and City Engineer. Staff presented the request to the Commission on August 8 and the Commission recommended approval. The City Council reviewed on August 15, requested a number of changes, which will be presented on September 19. B) McDonald's Variance — McDonald's has requested a variance to reduce the required setback for a replacement trash enclosure. The existing enclosure is being removed by Hennepin County in connection with the County Road 116 improvement project and needs to be relocated. The Planning Commission reviewed the request at the August 8 meeting and unanimously recommended approval. The City Council held a public hearing on September 5 and directed staff to prepare a resolution of approval, which will be presented to the Council on September 19. C) School Lake Nature Preserve CD PUD — Wally and Bridget Marx have requested review of a PUD General Plan of development and preliminary plat for a conservation design subdivision to include 6 lots and conservation of 70 acres (11.76 buildable). The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at the June 13 meeting and unanimously recommended approval. The applicant has adjusted plans in light of recent City Council direction to include a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres in rural CD-PUD projects. Staff intends to present the request at the September 19 City Council meeting. D) Excelsior Group PUD Concept Plan — The Excelsior Group has requested a comprehensive plan amendment for the City to amend the staging of development for property located north of Chippewa Road and west of Mohawk Drive for a 68-lot single-family subdivision. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 8 and generally did not find that the request met the criteria for developing earlier than the staging plan dictates. The Park Commission reviewed on August 16 and the Council on September 19. E) Weston Woods of Medina PUD Concept Plan — 1952 Chippewa Road — Mark of Excellence Homes has requested review of a PUD concept plan for the development of 94 twinhomes on 80 acres (-30 buildable) east of Mohawk Drive, and north of Chippewa Road. The Planning Commission is tentatively scheduled to hold a public hearing on September 12. The Park Commission is scheduled to review on September 20 and the City Council on October 3. F) JEGM Revoc Trust Solar Text Amendment and CUP — 2705 Willow Drive — The JEGM Revocable Trust has requested that the City consider amending its zoning code to increase the maximum footprint of ground mounted solar panels permitted on a rural property from 2500 square feet to 4000 square feet. The applicant has also requested a conditional use permit for construction of a 4000 square foot ground mounted solar array, a 2304 square foot greenhouse and 360 square foot warming shed. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 12 and Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 September 19, 2017 City Council Meeting recommended increasing the maximum footprint for solar equipment and also recommended approval of the CUP. The City Council is tentatively scheduled to review on October 3. G) Reserve of Medina Second Addition — Toll Brothers has requested approval of the second phase of the Reserve of Medina project. Staff intends to present the application at the September 19 meeting. H) OSI Lot Line Rearrangement — Open Systems International (OSI) has requested approval of a lot line rearrangement (division and combination) between their property at 4101 Arrowhead Drive and the adjacent outlot to the southeast. The applicant intends to extend their parking lot into this area. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request on August 8 and unanimously recommended approval. The City Council reviewed and adopted resolutions of approval on August 15. This item will now be closed. I) Crosby/Snow CUP, Johnson ADU CUP, Dykhoff Septic Variance, Hamel Brewery, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery — The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. J) Woods of Medina — This preliminary plat has been approved and staff is awaiting a final plat application K) Hamel Road Thirty Two, Hamel Haven subdivisions — These subdivisions have received final approval. Staff is working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before the plats are recorded Other Proiects A) Comprehensive Plan — The Steering Committee will meet Monday, September 18 at 7:00 a.m. to review the comments received from jurisdictions to date. B) Closed Landfill regulations — staff has drafted an ordinance related to the Woodlake Landfill as required by the MPCA in connection with the state's closed landfill program. The ordinance includes requirements which extend onto adjacent property. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the ordinance at the August 8 meeting and tabled the ordinance. Neighboring property owners raised concerns related to the impact of the ordinance on their property values. The Planning Commission directed staff to evaluate the ordinance to determine how the impacts of the ordinance could be reduced on property owners while still meeting state mandates. Staff drafted the ordinance and presented it at the September 12 meeting. The Planning Commission has requested additional information from the MPCA related to the Methane Gas and Groundwater areas of concern, which are scheduled to be presented at the October 10 meeting. C) Small Cellular Equipment webinar — staff took part in a webinar presented by the League of Minnesota Cities related to small cellular equipment. Recent changes to state laws mandate cities to allow these smaller antennae to be installed in the right-of-way, installed to existing poles, etc. The webinar explained the City's ability to regulate and permit these installations. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 September 19, 2017 City Council Meeting MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT i I 600 Clydesdale Trail Medina, MN 55340.9790 p:763.473.9209 f: 763-473-8858 IVI EDI NA non -emergency: 763.525.6210 MEMORANDUM Emergency gri-' TO: Mayor Robert Mitchell and City Council FROM: Edgar J. Belland, Director of Public Safety, Through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: September 14, 2017 RE: Department Updates Death of Wayzata Officer On September 8th Wayzata Patrol Officer William Mathews was killed on Interstate 394 in Wayzata. We had our officers covering different intersections diverting traffic around the accident scene and around Long Lake due to road closures. Sergeant Nelson, West Hennepin Public Safety Director Gary Kroells and I were in command of the traffic detail. It was a very difficult situation dealing with the death of one of our neighboring officers and dealing with all the traffic both east and westbound Interstate 394. We worked the scene for five hours. Everyone did a great job. Since the incident, I have been working with the other local chiefs on the funeral plan. They are expecting 3500 to 4000 police officers for the funeral. Our entire department is assisting at the funeral. Loretto FunFest On September 9th, we held the 17th annual Loretto Funfest. The event went off without incident. Again, the officers and reserves did a great job working the event. Medina Celebration Day The planning is coming together for Medina Celebration Day. Our assistant, Anne Klaers, is still looking for volunteers to assist with the event. If you could help, please contact Anne at 763-473-9209. Everything is set; we are hoping the weather will hold out for the entire event. Hope to see everyone there. Patrol by Sergeant Nelson On Friday, September 8th, 2017, several agencies responded to the call from dispatch that no one ever wants to hear. That is, "OFFICER DOWN". I, along with countless others, responded and attempted to assist our brother in blue but God had a different plan for Officer Bill Matthews of the Wayzata Police Department. It is truly one of the worst parts of the job, but it is a reality. Since that day, we have spent numerous man hours assisting in preparing for the wake and the funeral that is a massive undertaking. Patrol Activities For the dates of August 30 to September 13, 2017, our officers issued 28 citations and 127 warnings for various traffic infractions. There were a total of six traffic accidents, four medicals, seven alarms and five DWIs. On September 12, 2017, Officer McGill took a report from a party who indicated she had located three counterfeit bills inside her house after returning from out of town. Case forwarded to Investigations. On September 12, 2017, Officer McGill and I were dispatched to an unconscious female who was found by her husband. Upon arrival, we discovered the female was deceased. The Hennepin County Medical Examiner's Office responded and determined that the female had expired due to natural causes. On September 11, 2017, Officer McGill took a theft report from a victim who reported an unknown person had taken $500 from her TCF account via ATM. We took two identical cases from two separate victims. It's believed that their accounts were compromised by a skimming camera where they both made a purchase. Case forwarded to Investigations. On September 11, 2017, while on patrol Officer McGill noticed a grass fire on Willow Drive. The fire department was called and the fire was put out. It was discovered that someone had recently cut the grass and that the mower must have caused the fire. Due to the winds and the quick actions of Officer McGill, a crisis was averted. On September 10, 2017, Officers Hall and Scharf were dispatched to a shooting in the Medina Morningside neighborhood. Upon arrival, officers located a male who had accidentally shot himself in the leg while cleaning his handgun. Medical attention was given and the male was transported to the hospital. Case forwarded to Investigations. On September 9, 2017, Officers Hall and Scharf took a theft report. Victim reported that unknown person(s) stole one tire off her vehicle. Victim reports that she had just purchased four brand new tires. On September 7, 2017, Officers Hall and Scharf took a theft report. Victim reported that unknown person(s) had stolen a large lawn mower that he stores in the trail area of Wild Meadows. Case forwarded to Investigations. Investigations by Investigator Kevin Boecker Investigated a felony theft by issuance of a NSF check at a local business. Bank records were received from the individual's bank account which showed the check writer had funds in the account at time of issuance. Due to how the State Statute is written, we are unable to charge the person with a crime and the case becomes a civil dispute. The business was advised to take civil action against the check writer. Additional search warrants were executed at two banks for bank records pertaining to an employee theft from a business. Document delivery is still pending by both banks. Investigated a shooting that had occurred in the city. It was determined that the shooting victim had accidentally fired the weapon while attempting to disassemble the weapon for cleaning. No charges will be filed. The victim sustained a non -life threatening wound to the leg and was released from the hospital the following day after the incident. There are currently 13 open cases assigned to investigations. i I MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT 600 Clydesdale Trail Medina, MN 55340.9790 p:763.473.9209 f: 763-473-8858 IVI EDI NA non -emergency: 763.525.6210 MEMORANDUM Emergency gri-' TO: Mayor Robert Mitchell and City Council FROM: Edgar J. Belland, Director of Public Safety, Through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: September 14, 2017 RE: Death of Wayzata Office William Mathews I am unable to attend tonight's council meeting due to a training conference. With the death of Wayzata Police Officer William Mathews, the last week was devastating for all Law Enforcement across the State. Officer Mathews was killed while removing debris off Interstate 394 in Wayzata. The neighboring departments came together to support the Wayzata Police Department and Officer Mathews. Our entire department has been assisting with this event in some way. They care about this community and go above and beyond to serve. I am proud of each of them. We are supported by the entire City staff and the leadership. Everyone participates in accomplishing the tasks at hand. I thank everyone for all their assistance throughout this last week while we dealt with this tragedy. We have a great team made up of caring and talented people. Thank you! MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: September 13, 2017 MEETING: September 19, 2017 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • The street repair to the Tamarack Culvert Project has been completed. • The 55/116 project is moving along with the curbing on the east side being scheduled for the week of the 18th of September. Once the east side is complete, the project will switch to the west side. Most of the utility work is complete, so the west side should move along a little faster. With the northbound right turn off 55 closed we have had some complaints of cut through traffic from Casey's station. We are doing our best to resolve these issues. • Striping should be complete by the time you read this memo. The City did a lot of striping last year and is only doing a minimal amount this year - Willow Drive South, Mohawk Drive, Chippewa Road and Willow Drive North. • The Clydesdale paving project will begin after the east side of the 116/55 project is complete. WATER/SE WER/ST ORMWATER • The Water Tower Project is underway. The contractor started on September 5th, just about a week late. Everything is going as planned so far. The Public Works team is keeping a very close eye on the operation and will do everything we can to deliver quality service during this time. So far there has been a lot of sediment removal, antenna removal, and a lot of welding going on. Next week they will begin sand blasting and priming the interior wet well of the tower. If there are any issues I will convey them to Scott. • There was a valve leak repaired in the Preserve addition this week. This was a direct result of excavating equipment damaging a valve. This will be at the developer's expense. • There has been progress in the Bradford Addition in Independence Beach; getting the sewer and water services to the property line of the new lot. This is also at the expense of the owners. • Flushing in the Independence Beach area took place on the 14th of September. PARKS/TRAILS • I had a custom railing built for the extension of the new path along Elm Creek to get people safely across the creek along Hamel Road. Public Works will be staying in the ROW and the neighbors have been notified. • We are still hoping to install the volleyball court at the Fields of Medina Park. Between the rain and the endless list of things to do, it has been pushed out for other priorities. • We have a lot of dead elms to clean out of Harriette's woods along the trail way. • I will be working with the County to resolve the Pedestrian Crossing North of 55 for Medina Ridge. Staff's position is that we prefer the use of Lilac Drive as a route to the newly proposed crossing from Medina Ridge. There is a sidewalk halfway there already and the street poses little or no risk the rest of the way. We are ok with the County putting in a trail along CR 101 as long as the City is not paying for it or maintaining it. If you have any questions about the crossing please call. MISCELLANEOUS • Several of the PW guys will be helping with Medina Celebration Day once again — helping set up and being there with the equipment at the event itself. Page 2 of 2 ORDER CHECKS SEPTEMBER 6. 2017 - SEPTEMBER 19.2017 046323 ADELMANN TIM.......................................................................... $110.00 046324 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO ................................................. $2,138.48 046325 ADAM GALLAGHER................................................................... $150.00 046326 GOTTHILF CONSTANCE............................................................. $50.00 046327 JOHNSON DONNA MAE.............................................................. $10.00 046328 JOHNSON, JAMES R..................................................................... $8.70 046329 JP SALEA GROUP...................................................................... $150.00 046330 ROBERT OR KIM PASTOR.......................................................... $90.81 046331 PRIMROSE SCHOOL OF EDINA................................................. $75.00 046332 PRIMROSE SCHOOL -WEST PLYMOUTH................................... $75.00 046333 HIEBA, RASHED......................................................................... $250.00 046334 HUSEBY, JAMES........................................................................ $697.91 046335 MENDU, SUNIL........................................................................... $250.00 046336 RAINBOW PARTY ARTS............................................................ $830.00 046337 SHAH, SONAIL........................................................................... $250.00 046338 USA GOLF GAMES INC.......................................................... $1,076.20 046339 NORTHERN WILLIAMS JR......................................................... $100.00 046340 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE ................................................... $3,056.90 046341 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN ................................... $29,057.20 046342 BUDGET PRINTING....................................................................... $4.00 046343 C & L EXCAVATING INC....................................................... $60,517.91 046344 CENTERPOINT ENERGY........................................................... $200.54 046345 CENTURYLINK........................................................................... $225.21 046346 DESIGNING NATURE, INC........................................................ $311.80 046347 ECM PUBLISHERS INC................................................................ $87.07 046348 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ...................................................... $326.70 046349 GRAINGER.................................................................................... $24.11 046350 HACH COMPANY......................................................................... $97.38 046351 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I ................................. $500.00 046352 HAMEL LUMBER INC................................................................. $547.78 046353 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH ...................................................... $955.20 046354 HENN COUNTY SHERIFF.......................................................... $208.68 046355 HENN CTY RESIDENT/REAL ESTATE ........................................ $68.00 046356 KID & COMPANY RECYCLING INC.............................................. $98.00 046357 LANO EQUIPMENT INC............................................................... $92.01 046358 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES .......................................... $6,332.00 046359 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC.......................................... $41.00 046360 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN........................................................... $2,033.62 046361 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL .................................................. $25,399.93 046362 METRO WEST INSPECTION ................................................ $17,646.32 046363 MOTLEY AUTO SERVICE LLC............................................... $1,431.95 046364 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS ................................. $3,800.14 046365 OFFICE DEPOT.......................................................................... $296.43 046366 CITY OF ORONO..................................................................... $2,838.42 046367 STEVEN RUCHTI........................................................................ $620.00 046368 JAMIE R WIOME...................................................................... $5,533.40 046369 STREICHER'S.......................................................................... $6,498.81 046370 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI......................................................... $10,962.55 046371 TIMESAVER OFFSITE................................................................ $277.88 046372 TITAN MACHINERY.................................................................... $307.29 Total Checks $186,710.33 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 —SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 004294E PR PERA.................................................. 004295E PR FED/FICA............................................ 004296E PR MN Deferred Comp .............................. 004297E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA ........................ 004298E SELECT ACCOUNT .................................... 004299E CITY OF MEDINA...................................... 004300E SELECT ACCOUNT .................................... 004301E PR PERA.................................................. 004302E PR FED/FICA............................................ 004303E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA ........................ 004304E SELECT ACCOUNT .................................... 004305E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL............. 004306EAFLAC ...................................................... 004307E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC..................... 004308E CULLIGAN-METRO.................................... 004309E MARCO (LEASE) ....................................... 004310E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC............ 004311E SELECT ACCOUNT .................................... 004312E FRONTIER ................................................ 004313E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC ............................. Total Electronic Checks PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT SEPTEMBER 6.2017 $14,686.01 $16,707.38 ..$2,320.00 ..$3,471.70 .... $736.07 ...... $20.00 ........ $0.00 ...... $25.48 ...... $15.37 ........ $5.89 .... $601.13 .... $125.00 .... $394.88 ..$1,153.30 ...... $32.75 ..$1,069.21 .... $657.19 ...... $58.50 ...... $56.60 .... $288.67 $42,425.13 0508133 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L......................................................$1,332.97 0508134 ANDERSON, JOHN G................................................................$230.87 0508135 BARNHART, ERIN A.............................................................. $2,099.87 0508136 BELLAND, EDGAR J...............................................................$2,570.17 0508137 BOECKER, KEVIN D.............................................................. $3,016.45 0508138 CONVERSE, KEITH A.............................................................$2,159.29 0508139 COUSINEAU, LORIE K.............................................................. $230.87 0508140 DINGMANN, IVAN W.............................................................$1,990.41 0508141 ENDE, JOSEPH.....................................................................$1,620.67 0508142 FINKE, DUSTIN D................................................................. $2,178.54 0508143 GALLUP, JODI M...................................................................$1,752.05 0508144 GLEASON, JOHN M............................................................... $1,791.27 0508145 GREGORY, THOMAS.............................................................$1,886.96 0508146 HALL, DAVID M.................................................................... $2,094.14 0508147 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S............................................................$2,001.80 0508148 JOHNSON, SCOTT T............................................................. $2,230.19 0508149 KIESER, NICHOLAS..................................................................$726.54 0508150 KLAERS, ANNE M..................................................................$1,154.57 0508151 LANE, LINDA........................................................................$1,492.96 0508152 LEUER, GREGORYJ.............................................................. $1,937.23 0508153 MARTIN, KATHLEEN M.............................................................$230.87 0508154 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R.....................................................$1,470.19 0508155 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D..........................................................$1,723.67 0508156 MITCHELL, ROBERT G............................................................. $327.07 0508157 NELSON, JASON ...................................................................$2,394.68 0508158 PEDERSON,JEFF.....................................................................$221.92 0508159 PETERSON, DEBRA A............................................................$1,684.69 0508160 REINKING, DEREK M............................................................$1,591.50 0508161 SCHARF, ANDREW................................................................$1,500.62 0508162 SCHERER, STEVEN T............................................................ $2,289.29 0508163 VIEAU, CECILIA M................................................................ $1,148.42 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $49,080.74 PAYROLL MANUAL CHECK SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 0020437 SWALCHICK, CRAIG M.............................................................. $64.28 Total Payroll Manual Check $64.28