Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutCity Council_Minutes_1969-09-02_Regular 1969COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SEPTEMBER 2, 1969 INITIATION: 1. Mayor Harker called the regular meeting of the City Council to order at 7:34 p.m. 2. The invocation was given by Pastor A. R. Hagen, 7th Day Adventist Church, 9664 Broadway, Temple City. 3. Mayor Harker led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 4. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Councilmen: Beckley, Briggs, Merritt, Harker ABSENT: Councilmen: Tyrell ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Koski, City Attorney Martin, Assistant City Manager Recupero, Director of Public Works Pizzorno, Planning Director Dragicevich While Councilman Tyrell was not present at the time roll was called, he arrived during ceremonies prior to the commence of the first order of business. Before proceeding with business items, Mayor Harker presented plaques, in recognition of service on the Planning Commission, to Al Millham and David Oakley who had found it necessary to resign their offices because of health reasons. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Councilman Beckley asked that the minutes of August 19, 1969, be corrected to reflect that his absence at that meeting as due to reasons of business rather than vacation. It was moved by Council- man Briggs, seconded by Councilman Merritt and carried that the minutes be approved as corrected, Councilman Beckley abstaining. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:30 p.m. Re. Ordinance's No. 69 -291. 2nd. read. Amending Section 3100 of the Temple City Municipal Code and Readopting Code of County of Los Angeles as the Fire Code of the City of Temple City. City Manager Koski advised,hat the Public Hearing had been set as required in order to amend the Temple City Municipal Code for the purpose of readopting the Los Angeles County Fire Code, as amended. Mayor Harker declared the Public Hearing open. City Attorney Martin advised that the adoption of this ordinance would update the City's Fire Prevention Code by incorporating, by reference, the Fire Code of the County of Los Angeles. Mayor Harker invited those present who wished to speak for or against the matter to come forward. No one came forward. Councilman Merritt moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by Councilman Briggs and unanimously carried. City Attorney Martin presented Ordinance No. 69 -291 entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY AMENDING SECTION 3100 OF THE TEMPLE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE AND READOPTING THE FIRE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AS THE FIRE CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, for second reading and adoption by reference, by title only. It was so moved by Councilman Tyrell, seconded by Councilman Beckley and unanimously carried. Council Minutes, September 2, 1969 - Page 2 7 PUBLIC HEARING: 7:30 p.m. Re. Appeal - Conditional Use Permit No. 69 -291PC - 9503 E. Las Tunas Drive (Sam's Roast Beef Sandwiches) City Manager Koski advised that appeal re. Conditional Use Permit 6.9 -291 PC was before the Council on proposed. development of drive-in type restaurant on the northeast corner of Cloverly and Las Tunas, which permit had been denied by the Planning Commission. Mayor Harker declared. the Public Hearing open. Planning Director Dragicevich provided background information relative to subject property and adjacent area in the C -2 zone, wherein a drive-in restaurant with a structure of approximately 2,200 square feet, with 42 seating spaces, was proposed at the northeast corner of Cloverly and Las Tunas, the property approximately 100' x 110' to contain 22 parking spaces with ingress and egress on Las Tunas, and an exit on the one -way alley. At hearings conducted before the Planning Comm- ission, a modification to the plan had been requested to relocate the building which would place the restroom entrances away from the street (Cloverly) and to allow for ingress and egress from Cloverly instead of the exit to the alley to provide for better traffic cir- culation in the area. Councilman Merritt suggested that an entrance from the alley as well as the exit may permit an easier flow of traffic, rather than to just exit onto the alley. Mayor Harker invited those'in: the audience who wished to speak in favor of the appeal to come forward. In Favor Fred Westover, 12623 E. Imperial Highway, Santa Fe Springs, rep- resenting Gulf Oil, advised that Gulf Oil was the seller of the property, and that Denny's Restaurants was the buyer proposing the development. He considered that the type of business to be.conducted was compatible to the area and would provide revenue for the City, based upon approximately $30,000 gross per month. Joseph Gallant, representing Denny's Restaurants, advised that the location of the structure, as proposed, was the only way that the cite could be considered by Denny's in order to provide maximum view of the establishment to the public since the operation would not have enough recognition from the public in any other location on the site,r and needed to be seen quickly. He considered the flow of traffic as presented to be quite adequate, and did not feel that there was a saturation of restaurants in the City, based on studies made. He advised that the proposed restaurant would be franchise operated and the franchise operator was not involved with the development costs. In his discussion, he called attention to the fact that the operation of this restaurant was different than other drive -ins, and that this was not a drive -in per se. City Attorney Martin advised the Council, that before proceeding further with the hearing, that previous testimony of the Planning Commission and the extensive minutes should be brought into the record to avoid unnecessary duplication. Mayor Harker requested a motion to that effect which was so moved by Councilman Tyrell, seconded by Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried. The pro- ceedings from the Planning Commission were then received and made part of the record. Ken Primisinq, 9508 E. Olive, speaking in favor of the appeal, in- quired what was the objection of the Planning Commission. Mayor Harker advised that a revised plan had been requested to provide for the restrooms to be located off the street and had not been provided, and that concern of traffic flow had been major items of consider- ation. Council Minutes, September 2, 1969 - Page 3 Against Flora Lee Ancona, 5675 Loma, stated that she could not see any reason to bring more drive -in restaurants into the City, contri- buting to trash, loitering and racing of cars, etc., advising that we need more business houses, not drive -in restaurants. Paul Helm, 5825 N. Encinita, advised that the Sheriff's Depart- ment has enough problems with Jack -in- the -Box, Winchell's and other drive -in restaurants, and this will add another problem location to the City. He advised that . it brings in undesirable persons from other cities who come in and create trouble. Al Nunamaker, 5757 Agnes, and owner of Cool's Candies, 9549 Las Tunas, advised that the proposed development, Sam's .Roast -Beef Sandwiches, was different from a Denny's Restaurant, and would occupy a prime piece of property on Las Tunas in the middle of the downtown area. He suggested that such development at this time would hinder the overall development of Las Tunas for a large department store or other development. He stated that it was general procedure for oil companies to buy corner locations and hold the properties for years since they can write them off on their taxes. He also warned that since it is a lease operation, the franchise operators may change frequently. He stated that this development would stop the growth in the heart of the down- town, and suggested that with the cooperation of the Chamber of Commerce, overall development of some type should be considered at this time. Councilman Tyrell advised that in order for the Council to deny the application they must show cause. City Attorney Martin out- lined the reasons as follows: 1) is the site adequate as to area, size and access, 2) are the streets surrounding adequate to carry the traffic, and 3) will the type of use have an adverse effect on the neighboring properties or the City as a whole. Robert Barr, 5945 N. Cloverly, resident of Marbet Apartments, presented a petition bearing 42 signatures of residents at Marbet Apartments, opposing the development because of the traffic and noise problems that would be forthcoming from a drive -in type development. He advised that he was retired from the California Highway Patrol and was aware of the policing problems that would be involved, and that enforcement was limited on the private pro- perty. Jack Lloyd, 9480 E. Olive, speaking in favor of the applicant, considered that perhaps some of the problems at Winchell's were caused by the Kon -Tiki, and felt there was a need for the quick - type food service that would be provided. Geraldine Cheney, 5945 Cloverly (Marbet ,Apartments), opposing, advised that she drives 40 miles to work each day, but lives and spends her money in Temple City, however if the drive -in restaurant were permitted in this vicinity with the incumbent problems, she would necessarily move out of the City. Robert Bock, 5328 Encinita, speaking in favor, felt that it would provide a place for the young p7.61717— ple to go. He also felt that requirements of the building code and special conditions set up by the Planning Commission should suffice for granting permits. I( Mr. Nunamaker came __f..orward..., again to state that the criteria of three basic reasons for denial had been met in that: 1) the site was inadequate by Planning Commission requirements, 2) the street is inadequate for traffic, and 3) it would have an adverse effect on neighboring property as shown'here this evening. Council Minutes, September 2, 1969 - Page 4 City Manager Koski described an exhibit showing the present development of the downtown area, advising that the City was working on the future development of the area; also a tremendous investment has been made in public parking facilities and the pedestrian mall in order to encourage major development, and that this key location was a prime concern in the overall development of the central business area. There was some discussion as to the circulation of traffic around the site on Las Tunas, Cloverly and in the alley. There appeared to be the possibility of increased congestion, particularly in regard to the use of the alley for entering and exiting from the proposed development. City Attorney Martin advised that the hearing on this matter had been placed before thetouncil after having been before the Planning Commission, and that insufficient findings with respect to site, streets and adjoining area were included in the Planning Commission records; that it had been denied for reason of restrooms adjacent to the street and only by general language that other criteria had not been met. He advised that the Public Hearing could be continued, with the matter returned to the Planning Commission for refinement of their findings; or upon review of evidence presented, the Public Hearing could be closed and the Council could proceed with its decision. Councilman Merritt stated that he felt the application for permit for drive -in restaurant had been applied for under a misnomer since it was not a drive -in restaurant per se, and would like to see it go back to the Planning Commission for clarification. He then moved that the matter be returned to the Planning Commission for clarification as to the status of a permit, or a conditional use permit, on whether it is a drive -in or standard type restaurant, and if a drive -in, that findings be made as they relate to the three criteria established in the zoning code, suggesting that the Planning Commission may find some assistance in involving the Chamber of Commerce, and to continue the Public Hearing to October 7, 1969, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall,, since the basis for denial at the present time by the Planning Commission was inadequate and insufficient as a matter of law. The motion was seconded by Councilman Beckley. City Manager Koski advised that on September 9, 1969, the Planning Commission will hold Public Hearing with reference to zoning ordinance, with reference to walk -in /drive -in /drive -up restaurants, so that more definitive._.st.an.da.r.ds will be forthcomi..ng...a.t..that time. Mayor Harker requested action on the motion which carried unanimously. City Attorney Martin advised that the matter would now be returned to the Planning Commission to define more specific reasons for which they denied the application, and to determine more appropriately the classification of this restaurant as a drive -in, with the suggestion that the Chamber of Commerce be consulted, and findings be returned to the City Council for continued Public Hearing to be held on October 7, 1969. The following correspondence and petitions were received for the record: 1) Letter from Ray G. Fortner, Realtor, August 20, 1969, in favor. 2) Letter from Mark C. Nottingham, President, Marbet Apartments, August 20, 1969, opposing. 3) Petition presented by Robert Barr containing 42 signatures of residents at Marbet Apartments received September 2, 1969 (two documents), opposing. 4) Petition presented by Ray G. Fortner containing 29 signatures of business persons in the downtown area, received September 2, 1969 (two documents), in favor. Councilman Tyrell left the meeting at this time, it being 9:10 p.m. Council Minutes, September 2, 1969 - Page 5 8. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:30 p.m. Re. Assessments - Underground Utility District No. 1 City Manager Koski advised that the Public Hearing had been set to consider the assessments for the underground conversions that were completed by the City, and that property owners had been duly notified. Director of Public Works Pizzorno advised that of the 65 parcels involved, only six required work by the City, and it was recommended that the assessments now be approved. Mayor Harker declared the Public Hearing open, and invited those in the audience who wished to speak for or against the matter to come forward. No one wished to speak. Councilman Beckley moved to close the Public Hearing,, seconded by Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried. It was moved by Council- man Merritt to approve the assessments and direct that the properties be so assessed, and that staff proceed with the notification, seconded by Councilman Briggs and unanimously carried. Councilman Tyrell returned to the Council Chambers, having been absent for the one item only. 9. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:30 p.m. Re. Application for Change of Ownership -- Camellia Family Billiards, 9055 E. Las Tunas Drive City Manager Koski advised that an application had been received for change of ownership for. Camellia Family Billiards, located at 9055 E. Las Tunas Drive, and that hearing on the matter was being held pursuant to the business license ordinance. Mayor Harker declared the Public Hearing open. Lt. A. W. Olmby, Watch Commander, Temple City Station, was present to answer questions, and discussed juvenile problems in the City in general as they related to the Camellia Family ffilliards and other places.of business throughout the City where teenagers generally con- gregate. Deputy Gillmann, License Detail, advised that in accordance with the City Ordinance relative to change of ownership, the location had been posted for Public Hearing on August 12, 1969. He described the environ- ment of the property which the new owner plans to operate the same as it has been operated for the past two years. He advised that the previous owner had been operating until midnight on week nights and to 2 a.m. on Friday and Saturday nights, and that a check with the Sheriff's Office indicated no incidents have occurred at the location; and that problems of juvenile parking have received no complaints over the past several months. City Manager Koski advised that a report of an incident at the location the previous evening had been received today. It was noted that the application of the previous owner had been for operating from 12 noon until midnight, however that operations had not been conducted as stated in the application, since he was remaining open until 2 a.m. on Friday and Saturday nights, however this was not in conflict with the City Ordinance perse. Staff was directed to check into the matter of the closing hours of the present owner. The testimony having been heard, Councilman Briggs moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by Councilman Beckley and unanimously carried. Councilman Beckley stated that he would be in favor of recommending approval, subject to the closing hours being set from 12 noon to midnight, rather than to 2 a.m., and subject to review in 90 days, and so moved. The motion was seconded by Councilman Merritt. 1 1 Council Minutes, September 2, 1969 - Page 6 Councilman Tyrell stated that when the present owner had commenced operation, he had kept close watch on operations, but later was more lax, and advised that one of the conditions had been for the owner to be present on the premises during the time it is open, and that any person assuming managerial control in the absence of the licensee must first be identified to the Sheriff's License Detail, subject to the approval of the City of Temple City, and that this requirement had not always been met. Councilman Tyrell stated that a review of the operations should be made in 90 days, and each 90 days thereafter, for tighter control. Councilman Beckley amended his motion to include review each 90 days thereafter, with the consent of the second. Becuase of the stipulations to be placed on the owner by the motion under consideration, Mayor Harker called for the Public Hearing to be reopened, to allow the applicant an opportunity to discuss the requirements. Councilman Briggs moved to reopen the hearing, seconded by Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried. Ami Partlow, applicant, advised that he was not in favor of the closing hours of 12 midnight, particularly on Friday and Saturday night when he felt he should be allowed to operate until 2 a.m., because these were prime hours of operation. Following testimony by Mr. Partlow, Councilman Briggs moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried. Mayor Harker requested a roll call vote on the motion to approve the application for change of ownership, with the hours of operation limited to 12 noon to 12 midnight, Sunday through Thursday, and from 12 noon to 2 a.m. on Friday and Saturday, subject to review every 90 days and each 90 days thereafter, and that any person assuming managerial control in the absence of the licensee must first be identified to the Sheriff's License Detail and approved by the City of Temple City. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen - Beckley, Merritt, Tyrell, Harker NOES: Councilmen - Briggs ABSENT: Councilmen -None 10. ORDINANCE No. 69 -292: 2nd read. Re. Amendment to Temple City Zoning Ordinance to include major types of Shopping Centers in Conditional Use Permit Classification. Planning Director Dragicevich presented a checklist of standards for shopping center development in excess of 30,000 sq. ft. to be used as . guidelines, which had been prepared to assist the Planning Commission.., relative to future shopping center development in the City, which were discussed and concurred in by the City Council. City Attorney Martin presented Ordinance No. 69 -292, entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY AMENDING' THE ZONING CODE WITH RESPECT TO SHOPPING CENTERS, for second reading. Councilman Tyrell waived further reading and adoption, seconded by Councilman Briggs and unanimously carried. II 11. ORDINANCE NO. 69 -293: 1st read. Re. Amendment to Temple City Zoning Ordinance with Reference to Household Pets. City Attorney Martin presented Ordinance No. 69 -293 entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY AMENDING THE TEMPLE CITY ZONING REGULATIONS WITH REGARD TO HOUSEHOLD PETS, for first reading, advising that Council could discuss or deny at this time, or refer the matter to a study session. Council Minutes, September 2, 1969 - Page 7 Councilman Beckley inquired concerning the requirement of 7,200 square foot lot as noted in item 3 (d) of the proposed ordinance, when more than 12 birds would be maintained. While it was noted that the motion of the previous meeting had stipulated this as a basic lot size, it was the consensus that minimum sized lots meeting all of the requirements should not be penalized and this limitation should be deleted. Councilman Beckley stated he would still like to see a solid wall requirement at the edge of the property line, rather than a 10' setback for the bird cage, with no other restrictions. Councilman Merritt stated he still did not approve a permit system. Planning Director Dragicevich advised that pursuant to Council request, staff had contacted other communities relative to whether permit procedures were in effect, and that no other community contacted had such procedure. Alter- natives to the procedure were also presented. Councilman Tyrell moved to waive further reading, as amended, _seconde i by Councilman Briggs and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen - Beckley, Briggs, Tyrell, Harker NOES: Councilmen - Merritt ABSENT: Councilmen -None It was noted that the following persons had asked to be contacted relative to working out standards and wished to be contacted when the matter was considered by the Planning Commission: Francis Billie, 4935 Doreen; Boyce O'Bannon, 10316 E. Olive; Henry Kay, 6444 N. Oak; and Harold McKeen, 9610 Val Street. 12. CITY -WIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT City Manager Koski advised that a report from Krelle & Lewis had been received by the City, and reviewed by the Director of Public Works and himself, and submitted for acceptance by the City Council. He stated that the name of the district, given _..as_..Camellia in the report, was provided as a temporary measure, and that the Tax Collector's office of the County recommends naming the district as Municipal Lighting District in order to avoid confusion with named lighting districts of the County. A resolution of intention, Resolution No. 69 -944, and .a resolution to set time and place for Public Hearing, Resolution No. 69 -945, were also presented for approval. Councilman Tyrell moved to receive the report and to adopt Resolution No. 69 -944 entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM A LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT, WHICH DISTRICT IS TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF A STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM, INCLUDING LIGHTING FIXTURES AND APPLIANCES FURNISHED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED, AND ELECTRIC CURRENT TO BE FURNISHED FOR LIGHTING SAID FIXTURES; and Resolution No. 69 -945 entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT REFERRED TO IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION No. 69 -944, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF SAID CITY COUNCIL TO GIVE NOTICE OF SAID HEARING, setting Public Hearing for Thursday, September 25, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. The motion was seconded by Councilman Briggs and carried unanimously. 13. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY - Request for Franchise City Attorney Martin presented a request for a 15 -year franchise from Southern California Water Company, advising that it was necessary to call a Public Hearing on the matter and presented Resolution No. 69 -943 entitled RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO GRANT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY A FRANCHISE TO USE OR TO LAY AND USE PIPES, DITCHES, FLUMES, CONDUITS AND APPURTEN- ANCES FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING WATER FOR ANY AND ALL Council Minutes, September 2., 1969 - Page 8 PURPOSES IN, ALONG, ACROSS, UPON AND UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, to set Public Hearing on Tuesday, October 7, 1969, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. Councilman Tyrell moved adoption, seconded by Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried. Don Lawson, 9545•Blackley, came forward to request consi_derati.on . in the franchise, that installations of fire hydrants be clarified, advising that costs vary between water companies and that this was an opportunity to work towards a standard price in upgrading the fire hydrants. Staff was requested to work with the water companies in an effort to determine an equitable figure, agreeable to all, which amount should be included in the franchise. 14. RESOLUTION No. 69 -948: Re. Adoption of 1969 Supplement to Uniform Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction - 1967 Edition. City Manager Koski presented Resolution No. 69 -948 entitled A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, ADOPTING THE 1969 SUPPLEMENT TO THE UNIFORM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, 1967 EDITION. Councilman Tyrell moved to adopt, seconded by Councilman Briggs and unanimously carried. 15. BROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - Rosemead to Encinita - Request for Time Extension City Manager Koski presented a request from contractor, Sully Miller Contr., for time extension on Broadway Improvement Project, Rosemead to Encinita, due to strike. Councilman Tyrell moved to approve, seconded by Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried. 16. ACCEPTANCE OF BID - LONGDEN AVENUE IMPROVEMENT - Temple City Blvd. to Golden West (Cash Contract 2000X) City Manager Koski advised that five bids had been received for the improvement of Longden Avenue, Temple City Boulevard to Golden West, and that the most favorable bid had been received from F. W. Richter Associates, in the amount of $29,541.77, recommending the award of contract. Councilman Tyrell moved that the contract for the improve- ment of Longden Avenue, Temple City Boulevard to Golden West, be awarded to F. W. Richter Associates of Sierra Madre in the amount of $29,541.77, seconded by Councilman Briggs and unanimously carried. 17. SET PUBLIC HEARING - Re. Curb, Gutter and Driveway Approaches HALIFAX, east .sl.de, Olive to Freer. Councilman _Beckley moved that a _Public Hearing be set re. curb, gutter and driveway approaches for Halifax, east side, Olive to Freer, on Tuesday, September 16, 1969, at, 7 :30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, seconded by Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried. 18. SET PUBLIC HEARING - Re. Appeal by applicant, John Marshall, re. Zone Variance Case No. 69- 292PC, 9240 Longden 'Avenue City Manager Koski advised that an appeal from the Planning Commission decision had been received from John Marshall, 9240 Longden Avenue, relative to zone variance case No. 69- 292PC. Councilman Tyrell moved to set for Public Hearing on Tuesday, September 16, 1969, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, seconded by Councilman Briggs and unanimously carried. 19. PERSONNEL APPOINTMENTS: City Manager Koski presented Resolution No. 69 -946, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPOINTING PERSONNEL - TEMPORARY. Councilman Tyrell moved to adopt, seconded by. Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried. Council Minutes, September 2, 1969 - Page 9 20. WARRANTS & DEMANDS: RESOLUTION No. 69 -947 Councilman Briggs moved to adopt Resolution No. 69 -947, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $45,957.77, DEMAND NOS. 592 THROUGH 666. Councilman Briggs seconded the motion which carried unanimously. 21. COMMUNICATIONS: City Manager Koski advised that a petition had been received from residents on Encinita, bearing 50 signatures, recommending closure of Jack -in- the -Box and suspension of City license in lieu of a public nuisance because of nightly distur- bances at the location. He advised that a report from the Sheriff's Department had not yet been received. Previous efforts to resolve problems had appeared successful until this new complaint had been received. Councilman Tyrell moved to set for Public Hearing on Tuesday, October 7, 1969, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, to ascertain if a public nuisance is being maintained, seconded by Councilman Beckley and unanimously carried. Persons present in the audience were invited to be present for the public hearing and to present testimony at that time. 22. TIME FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO.SPEAK: No one came forward. 23. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS: A. City Manager Koski requested authorization to draw check for pre - registration of authorized City delegates to attend the League of California Cities Conference to be held in San Francisco, September 28 - October 1, 1969. Councilman Tyrell moved to approve, seconded by Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried. City Manager Koski advised that costs for various items at the Conference were increased this year, and that an additional per diem allowance may need to be considered. B. City Manager Koski p resented a letter from Stan McVey, McVey Insurance Agency, submitting his proposal for City insurance, advising that it was in order and that there would be increased premium costs. City Manager Koski advised that the present insurance carried by the City provided by the low bidder was inadequate, and recommended accepting the proposal of Mr. McVey, the second low bidder, to provide the City insurance at a cost of $6,115. Councilman Tyrell moved to approve, seconded by Mayor Harker and unanimously carried. C. City Manager Koski presented the following escrows as completed and ready for approval: 1. Giffis property, 9221 Pentland, for corporation yard, in the amount of $19,000 for which Resolution No. 69 -949' entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY. Councilman Tyrell moved to adopt Resolution No. 69 -949, seconded by Councilman Beckley and unanimously carried. 2. Collins property, for Live Oak Park extension, in the amount of $212,000. Councilman Tyrell moved to approve, and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign, seconded by Councilman Merritt and carried by the following roll call voter AYES: Councilmen- Beckley, Briggs, Merritt, Tyrell, Harker NOES: Councilmen -None Mayor Harker moved authorization to draw warrants in the amount of $19,000 for the purchase of the Pentland property, and $212,000 for the purchase of property for extension of Live Oak Park, seconded by Councilman Tyrell and unanimously carried. 1 Council Minutes, September 2, 1969,- Page 10 D. Assistant City Manager Recupero reported that all signals were now operating properly on Las Tunas Drive. E. Councilman Beckley advised that two delegates were needed to vote on matters at meetings of': the 'League of California Cities on September 4, and that he would be present at the meeting to vote on Rapid Transit matters, stating that he would vote to re -elect Mr. Gleckman unless Council directed him otherwise. Councilman Tyrell moved to accept Councilman Beckley's recommendation, seconded by Mayor Harker and unan- imously carried. Councilman Merritt advised that he would attend as the Cal League representative, to vote on other League matters. F. Councilman Tyrell advised that a special program on pornography was arranged with the cooperation of the Sheriff's Department, for the Coordinating Council Luncheon to be held the 4th Monday in September, location yet to be determined. 24. ADJOURNMENT: It was moved by Councilman Briggs to adjourn to the next regular meeting of the City Council, to be held on Tuesday, September 16, 1969, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, seconded and carried. The meeting was adjourned at 10 :50 p.m. ATTEST: MAYOR