Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout19831214 - Agendas Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 83-30 Meetrng 83-30 1% ##F MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 375 DISTEL CIRCLE,SUITE D-1,LOS ALTOS,CALIFORNIA 94022 (415) 965-4717 REGULAR MEETING Wednesday BOARD OF DIRECTORS 375 Distel Circle, D-1 December 14, 1983 Los Altos, California A G E N D A (7:30) ROLL CALL i APPROVAL OF MINUTES (November 9, 1983) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ADOPTION OF AGENDA ORAL COMMUNICATIONS OLD BUSINESS WITH ACTION REQUESTED (7:45) 1 . Final Adoption of Use and Management Plans - Costanoan Way and E1 Sereno Open Space Preserves -- D. Hansen (7:55) 2. Final Adoption of Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve Use and Management Plan -- D. Hansen (8:00) 3. Request for Proposals for Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve Master Plan D. Hansen NEW BUSINESS WITH ACTION REQUESTED (8:05) 4. Proposed Addition to Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve, Mt. Umunhum Area (Mariscal Property) -- C. Britton Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of Agreement to Purchase Real Property, a Authorizing Officer to Execute Certificate of Acceptance of Grant to Dis- trict, and Authorizing General Manager to Execute Any and All Other Documents Necessary to Closing of the Transaction (Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve - Mariscal Property) (8:20) 5. Annual Review of Relative Site Emphasis Plan and Use and ",anagement Plan. Review Schedule -- D. Hansen (8:50) 6. Bus Tour of District Lands for Public Officials -- C. MacDonald (9:10) 7. Added Disability Coverage for Rangers -- H. Grench (9:20) 8. Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve - Purchase of Leasehold Interest and Interim Lease Agreement -- C. Britton Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of the Purchase of Leasehold Interest and j Interim Lease Agreement and Authorizing the President or Appropriate Officers j to Execute the Agreement on Behalf of the District (Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve) (9:30) 9. Santa Clara County Request for Telecommunication Facility Within the Federal Aviation Administration Black Mountain Site on Monte Bello Open Space Preserve -- C. Britton Resolution Approving the Ground Communications Sublease Between the Federal Aviation Administration and the County of Santa Clara (Monte Bello Open Space Preserve - Black Mountain) Agenda - Meeting 83-30 Page two (9:35) INFORMATIONAL REPORTS CLAIMS CLOSED SESSION (Land Negotiation and Litigation Matters) ADJOURNMENT TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: When an item you're concerned with appears on the agenda, please address the Board at that time. Otherwise, you may address the Board under OraZ Communications. When recognized, please begin by stating your name and address. Conciseness is appreciated. We request ,you coMZete the .Forms rovided so your name Iand address can be accurdteZ� incZuded in the minutes. I -, �.w MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 375 DISTEL CIRCLE,SUITE D-1,LOS ALTOS,CALIFORNIA 94422 (415)965-4717 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 9, 1983 MINUTES I. ROLL CALL President Daniel Wendin called the meeting to order at 7:40 P.M. Members Present: Daniel Wendin, Katherine Duffy, Teena Henshaw, Edward Shelley, Nonette Hanko, Harry Turner and Richard Bishop. Personnel Present: Herbert Grench, Craig Britton, David Hansen, Del Woods, Bill Tannenbaum, James Boland, Charlotte MacDonald, Mary Gundert, Lea Brown, Jean Fiddes and Stanley Norton. II. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS L. Brown stated the Board had received the following written communications: 1) A thank you letter, dated November 9, expressing admiration to the District for its volunteer Docent Program from Marjorie .teal, San Jose Board, Association of American University Women; 2) a letter from Assemblyman Robert W. Naylor recommending serious consideration of the San Mateo County Arts Council' s proposal for potential use of the existing Hassler buildings: 3) an invitation from Ronald and Rolayne Storz to the Board and interested staff to tour Picchetti on November 12 at 10 A.M; 4) a letter, dated November 7, from Catherine A. Worthinaham, President Peninsula Art Association of Belmont urging the Board' s complete support to saving the Hassler buildings; 5) c.opies of correspondence between Paul Benchener and Joseph Judge regarding the ballot measure for the Britton Heights Condominium Association dated November 2 and November 7; and 6) notification of revised 1983-84 estimated property tax revenue from Controller of San Mateo County dated October 19. Herbert A.Grench,General Manager Board of Directors:Katherine Duffy,Barbara Green,Nonette G.Hanko,Richard S.Bishop.Edward G.Shelley,Harry A.Turner.Daniel G.Wendin Meeting 83-27 Page Two III. ADOPTION OF AGENDA H. Grench requested the addition of a sixth agenda item, Consideration of Location for November 22 Special Meeting and December Meeting Schedule, to New Business with Action Requested. Motion: R. Bishop moved to adopt the agenda as amended. D. Wendin seconded the motion. -The .motion Dasse:d unanimously. IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were no oral communications. V. NEW BUSINESS WITH NO ACTION REQUESTED A Status of' District' s 19 3-84 Legislative Program H. Grench reviewed memorandum .M-83-133 of November 2, 1983 concerning the status of the District' s 1983-84 Legislative Program. He introduced Ralph Heim, the District' s Legislative Advocate in Sacramento, who discussed in detail the .1983 legislative year and possible 1984 legislative actions. The Board recessed for a break at 8:35 P.M. and reconvened at 8:45 P.M. VI. OLD BUSINESS WITH ACTION REQUESTED A) Final Adoption of Interim Use and Management Plan for the Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve (McCoy Property) D. Hansen reviewed memorandum M-83-132 of October 21,recommending the adoption of interim use and management plan for the former McCoy property as contained in report R-83-39 and withholding the property from dedication. Motion: N. Hanko moved the Board adopt the interim use and management plan and withhold the property from dedication. R. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. B) Final Adoption of Interim Use And Management Plan For The Coal Creek Open Space Preserve (Stallings Property) D. Hansen reviewed memorandum M-83-132 of October 21. He noted the interim use and management plan had been amended to state the potential for bicycle trails should be investigated, and stated all buildings had been removed on the site. Motion: E. Shelley moved the adoption of the recommendations in memorandum M-83-131, including the amendment and the dedication of the property as open space. K. Duffy seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Meeting 83-27 Page Three VII. NEW BUSINESS WITH ACTION REQUESTED A) Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve Use And Management Plan D. Hansen introduced report R-83-45 of November 1, 1983, noting the following corrections should be made in the report: 1) the next scheduled review in the summer of 1984 mentioned in paragraph two of Planning Considerations refers to the proposed parking lot area on Kennedy Road, and not the entire plan; and 2) the third sentence in the New Use and Management Recommendation on page three should read "A specific parking area plan wi Ilbe returned to you in the summer of 1984. " D. Moods showed slides of the Preserve to illustrate points made in the report, and D. Hansen discussed the staff recommendation to change the name of the Preserve to Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve and the combination of the El Sombroso Area, the Mt. Thayer Area, and the Mt. Umunhum Area into a single area to be known as the Mt. Umunhum Area. Discussion focused on the development of a parking area near Kennedy Road and included reasons for acquiring the P.M. and Associates property for enhancing public access; Peninsula Open Space Trust' s interest in participating in the development of the parking area; impacts of a parking area and increased use of the preserve and other sites in the area on the District' s Ranger staff and its patrol capabilities; the Preserve' s position in the Relative Site Empahsis Plan and financial implications of undertaking the parking lot project in light of the Preserve' s position in the plan; and timing of meetings with the town of Los Gatos and neighbors prior to presenting the parking area plan to the Board in the summer of 1984. K. Duffy discussed current access to the Kennedy Road Area and suggested a stile be placed next to the gate at the entrance as an interim measure until the parking area is developed in 1985. She also requested that maps included in reports indicate parcel names and names of trails. D. Woods stated staff intended to work on the stile within the next few months. D. Wendin requested the status of item three on page three q P g referring to the Kennedy Road access be modified to reflect the plans described by D. Woods. D. Hansen stated staff was also recommending the dedication of the former 21 acre P.M. and Associates property. D Wendin stated the Budget Committee had been charged to examine Meeting 83-27 Page Four the Open Space Management Budget Guidelines and requested staff arrange a meeting for the Committee. Motion: D. Wendin moved the tentative adoption of the use and management recommendations contained in report R-83-44 with the minor modifications on the dates relative to the parking lot and with the understanding that the staff will return with modified wording on paragraph 3 on the top of page 3, including recommendations for the name changes and the intent to dedicate the former P.M. and Associates property. R. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. B) Electrification of Bean House, Long Ridge Open Space Preserve (Memorandum R-83-44 of November 3, 1983) Motion: H. Turner moved that the Board approve the under- ground electrification of the Bean House and authorize staff to proceed with the necessary bidding process. E. Shelley seconded the motion. The motion Passed unanimously. C) Consideration of Location for November 22 Special Meeting and December Meeting Schedule H. Grench noted that since an item concerning Hassler would be on the November 22 agenda, staff was proposing the meeting be held in San Carlos in order to be closer to People who are interested in the item. He said the meeting could be held at St. Charles Church. The members of the Board felt that the San Carlos Council Chambers would be more convenient for the meeting. Motion: E. Shelley moved that the Special Meeting set for November 22 be held at the San Carlos Council Chambers with St. Charles Church as a back-up location. H. Turner seconded. The motion passed unanimously. H. Grench recommended that the meeting of December 28 be cancelled and rescheduled for December 7. Motion: N. Hanko moved that the Regular Meeting of December 28 be cancelled and the Regular Meeting be rescheduled to December 7. Bishop seconded. The motion passed unanimously. VIII. INFORMATIbN REPORTS C. Britton r_e_p_o_rT_eU he had received a letter from the City and County of San Francisco that would allow the District to cross the Hetch Hetchy waterlines during a three month period to be designated by the District at any time during calendar year 1984 for Hassler building removal Purposes. Meeting 83-27 Page Five D. Wendin reported on the Upper House Committee noting C. MacDonald and D. Hansen have been asked to analyse further the proposals from the Boy Scouts and Six Rivers Ranch and School. He said the next meeting will be held at 12:15 on November 21; the KTC-Palo Alto Buddhist Center had withdrawn; the committee will not consider any proposal to move the house at this time; and a further report will be given at the next Board meeting. T.Henshaw remarked on the popularity of Deer Hollow Farm at Rancho San Antonio and said she would be exploring other possible sites that could be used in a similar manner. D. Hansen reported on the South Skyline Association meeting he, J. Boland and J. Escobar had attended. IX APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Motion: E. Shelley moved the approval of the revised claims list. R. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. X CLOSED SESSION The Board recessed to a closed session on land acquisition, litigation, and personnel matters at 10:00 P.M. XI ADJOURNMENT The Board reconvened to adjourn at 11:36 P.M. Lea Brown Secretary Claims 83-21 Mec tg 83-27 Nov. ,)gr 9,1983 evise MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT C L A I M S Amount Name Description 73 $ 102. 71 Bruce Barton Pump Service,lnc. Water Pump P.eDair-Saratoga Gap Open Space Preserve 74 900.00 California Advocates, Inc. Legislative Consultant's Fee-Oct. 75 80.00 California Park & Recreation Membership Fee Society, Inc. 76 459. 70 Communications Research Co. Installation of Radio ancl Revairs �77 300.00 Susan Cretekos Patrol Services-Oct. 78 57.99 Creutzburg, Inc. Equipment Identification Tags 79 98.17 The Dark Room Photo Processing 80 506. 90 First Interstate Bank of CA Note Paying Agent-1982 Series 81 25.99 Foster -Bros. Security System Keys 82 122. 19 Herbert Grench Local I1ea1 Conference, Seminar and Benefit Payment 3 565.64"Lawrence Tire Service, Inc. Tires for District Vehicle 84 282.13 Charlotte MacDonald Reimbursement for Prints and Office Furniture � 5 81. 73 Mobil Oil Gas for District Vehicles �6 10. 86 Monogram Industries, Inc. Shop Supplies '87 39. 80 Stanley :Norton Phone,Copying and Meal Conference Expense 88 12173.11 Pacific Telephone Telephone Service !89 156. 91 Peninsula Office Supply Office Supplies 00 63. 11 Pitney Bowes Postage Meter Rental 91 40,476. 00 Plant Insultation_ Co. Removal of Asbestos Materials- , Hassler 92 101. 96 Rancho Hardware and Garden Shop Paint,Shop and Plumbing Supplies 3 403. 22 Shell Oil Co. Gas and Repairs for District Vehicles 4 63.26 Stevens Creek Surplus Department Utility Truck Box for Cleaning Store Supplies 5 298. 20 Vanier Graphics Corp. Printing of Purchase Orders b 392.45 Xerox Xerox. Supplies Meeting `�:3-27 i Noveml 9,1983 Amount _ Name Description �°97 $ 208. 80 San Francisco Water Dept. Water Service-Hassler I98 . 42.25 Basalt Sand and Rock Nursery Plants-Monte Bello Open Space Preserve 199 400.00 Foss and Associates' Personnel Consulting Fee-Oct. 00 78.50 _Lynda Rose Trimming and Cleaning of Roadside and Ditches-Coal Creek Open Space'Preserve I`Ol 17.07 Norney's Office Supplies l02 20,000.00 Mrs. Jane Stallings Balance of Purchase Price 103 4,731.00 Sorgdrager Trucking Bond Payments for Hassler Demolition !D4 13. 33 .Sears#Roebuck and Co. Vacuum Hose for Ranger Office i05 610.00 SGS,Znc.. Road Repair-Coal Creek Open Space Preserve 06 *26,896.61 San Francisco Federal Savings Ross �Realty Trust Fund-Bums and Loan Association Property Purchase 07 380.00 County of San Mateo Permit Fee-Hassler Buildings Demolition 08 • 1,423.00 Keller and Daseking,Architects Architectural Services-I1assler b9 203. 75 Petty Cash Drafting Materials ,Environr.+ental Conferences, L�i.scellaneous Office Suppl%es ,Totaa 2iap,Photo Album, - Subscription,Local Meal Conferences, Photo Processing,Private Vehicle _ Expense,Gas for Couri.er,and PCC Seminars *Note : This is the payment of accumulated Real Estate Commission allocation withheld from Ross Realty since 1978 because of a" dispute by ttvo other parties over payment. This matter is now being resolved b, a law suit between those parties, and they have agreed to a neutral depository. r �, { _� Mt ^'7 .i 7J` i F -� y. .s,. '1`7 7 l � f �, _ � I III i ..�a y.� - "� y..:. .. MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 375 DISTEL CIRCLE,SUITE D-1,LOS ALTOS,CALIFORNIA 94022 (415)965-4717 REGULAR 1-FETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 9, 1983 MINUTES I. ROLL CALL President Daniel Wendin called the meeting to order at 7 :40 P.M. Members Present: Daniel Wendin, Katherine Duffy, Teena Henshaw, Edward Shelley, Nonette Hanko, Harry Turner and Richard Bishop. Personnel Present: Herbert Grench, Craig Britton, David Hansen, Del Woods, Bill Tannenbaum, James Boland, Charlotte MacDonald, Mary Gundert, Lea Brown, Jean Fiddes and Stanley Norton. II. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS L. Brown stated the Board had received the following written communications: 1) A thank you letter, dated November 9, expressing admiration to the District for its volunteer Docent Program from Marjorie Neal,, San Jose Board, Association of American University Women; 2) a letter from Assemblyman Robert W. Naylor recommending serious consideration of the San Mateo County Arts Council ' s proposal for potential use of the existing Hassler buildings; 3) an invitation from Ronald and Rolayne Storz to the Board and interested staff to tour Picchetti on November 12 at 10 A.M; 4) a letter, dated November 7, from Catherine A. Worthinnham, President Peninsula Art Association of Belmont urging the Board' s complete support to saving the Hassler buildings; 5) copies of correspondence between Paul Denchener and Joseph Judge regarding the ballot measure for the Brittan Heights Condominium Association dated November 2 and :November 7; and 6) notification of revised 1983-84 estimated property tax revenue from d October 19 ro Controller of San Mateo County date II Herbert A.Grench,General Manager Board of Directors:Katherine Dutty.Barbara Green,Nonette G.Hanko,Richard S,Bishop.Edward G.Shelley.Harry A.Turner.Daniel G.Wendin Meeting 83-27 Page Two III. ADOPTION OF AGENDA H. Grench requested the addition of a sixth agenda item, Consideration of Location for November 22 Special Meeting and December Meeting Schedule, to New Business with Action Requested. Motion: R. Bishop moved to adopt the agenda as amended. D. Wendin seconded the motion.. 'The-,motion passed unanimously. IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were no oral communications. V. NEW BUSINESS WITH NO ACTION REQUESTED A) Status of' Distiict' s 9 3-84 Legislative Program H. Grench reviewed memorandum M-83-133 of November 2, 1983 concerningthe status of the District' s 19$3-84 Legislative g Program. He introduced Ralph Heim, the District' s Legislative Advocate in Sacramento, who discussed in detail the .1983 legislative year and possible 1984 legislative actions. The Board recessed for a break at 8 :35 P.M. and reconvened at 8:45 P.M. VI. OLD BUSINESS WITH ACTION REQUESTED A) Final Adoption of Interim Use and Management Plan for the Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve (McCoy Propertv) D. Hansen reviewed memorandum M-83-132 of October 21,recommending the adoption of interim use and management plan for the former McCoy property as contained in report R-83-39 and withholding the property from dedication. Motion: N. Hanko moved the Board adopt the interim use and management plan and withhold the property from dedication. R. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. B) Final Adoption of Interim Use And Management Plan For The Coal Creek Open Space Preserve (Stallings Property) D. Hansen reviewed memorandum M-83-132 of October 21. He noted the interim use and management plan had been amended to state the potential for bicycle trails should be investigated, and stated all buildings had been removed on the site. Motion: E. Shelley moved the adoption of the recommendations in memorandum M--83-131, including the amendment, and the dedication of the property as open space. K. Duffy seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Meeting 83-27 Page Three VII. NEW BUSINESS WITH ACTION REQUESTED A) Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve Use And Management Plan D. Hansen introduced report R-83-45 of November 1, 1983, noting the following corrections should be made in the report: 1) the next scheduled review in the summer of 1984 mentioned in paragraph two of Planning Considerations refers to the proposed parking lot area on Kennedy Road, and not the entire plan; and 2) the third sentence in the New Use and Management Recommendation on page three should read "A specific parking area plan will be returned to you in the summer of 1984. " D. Woods showed slides of the Preserve to illustrate points made in the report, and D. Hansen discussed the staff recommendation to change the name of the Preserve to Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve and--the combination of the El Sombroso Area, the Mt. Thayer Area, and the Mt. Umunhum Area into a single area to be known as the Mt. Umunhum Area. Discussion focused on the development of a parking area near Kennedy Road and included reasons for acquiring the P.M. and Associates Property for enhancing public access; Peninsula Open Space Trust' s interest in participating in the development of the parking area; impacts of a parking area and increased use of the preserve and other sites in the area on the District' s Ranger staff and its patrol capabilities; the Preserve' s position in the Relative Site Empahsis Plan and financial implications of undertaking the parking lot project in light of the Preserve' s position in the plan; and timing of meetings with the town of Los Gatos and neighbors prior to presenting the parking area plan to the Board in the summer of 1984. K. Duffy discussed current access to the Kennedy Road Area and suggested a stile be placed next to the gate at the entrance as an interim measure until the parking area is developed in 1985. She also requested that maps included in reports indicate parcel names and names of trails. D. Woods stated staff intended to work on the stile within the next few months. D. Wendin requested the status of item three on page three referring to the Kennedy Road access be modified to reflect the plans described by D. Woods. D. Hansen stated staff was also recommending the dedication of the former 21 acre P.M. and Associates property. D Wendin stated the Budget Committee had been charged to examine Meeting 83-27 Page Four the Open Space Management Budget Guidelines and requested staff arrange a meeting for the Committee. Motion: D. Wendin moved the tentative adoption of the use and management recommendations contained in report R-83-44 with the r-Anor modifications on the dates relative to the parking lot and with the understanding that the staff will return with modified wording on paragraph 3 on the top of page 3, including recommendations for the name changes and the intent to dedicate the former P.M. and Associates property. R. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimouslv. B) Electrification of Bean House, Long Ridge Open Space Preserve (Memorandum R-83-44 of November 3, 1983) Motion: H. Turner moved that the Board approve the under- ground electrification of the Bean House and authorize staff to proceed with the necessary bidding process. E. Shelley seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. C) Consideration of Location for November 22 Snecial -Meeting and December Meeting Schedule Ii. Grench noted that since an item concerning Hassler would be on the November 22 agenda, staff was proposing the meeting be held in San Carlos in order to be closer to People who are interested in the item. He said the meeting could be held at St. Charles Church. The members of the Board felt that the San Carlos Council Chambers would be more convenient for the meeting. Motion: E. Shelley moved that the Special Meeting set for November 22 be held at the San Carlos Council Chambers with St. Charles Church as a back-up location. H. Turner seconded. The motion passed unanimously. H. Grench recommended that the meeting of December 28 be cancelled and rescheduled for December 7. Motion: N. Hanko moved that the Regular Meeting of December 28 be cancelled and the Regular Meeting be rescheduled to December 7. Bishop seconded. The motion passed unanimously. VIII. INFORMATIOI,q REPORTS C. Britton reported he had received a letter from the City and County of San Francisco that would allow the District to cross the Hetch Hetchy waterlines during a three month period to be designated by the District at any time during calendar year 1984 for Hassler building removal purposes. Meeting 83-27 Page Five D. V7endin reported on the Upper House Committee noting C. MacDonald and D. Hansen have been asked to analyse further the proposals from the Bo Scouts and Six Rivers Ranch and Y 1 5 on He said the next meeting will be held at 2.1 School. 9 -v withdrawn; had wit November 21; the KTC _a10 Alto Buddhist Center , the committee will not consider any proposal to move the house at this time; and a further report will be given at the next Board meeting. T.Henshaw remarked on the popularity of Deer Hollow Farm at Rancho San Antonio and said she would be exploring other possible sites that could be used in a similar manner. D. Hansen reported on the South Skyline Association meeting he, J. Boland and J. Escobar had attended. IX APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Motion: E. Shelley moved the approval of the revised claims list. R. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. X CLOSED SESSION The Board recessed to a closed session on land acquisition, litigation, and personnel matters at 10:00 P.M. XI ADJOURNMENT The Board reconvened to adjourn at 11:36 P.M. Lea Brown Secretary Claims 83-21 Me( ig 83-27 Ioti oar 9,1983 evlse MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT C L A I M S Amount Name Descri. ti.on -'73 $ 102. 71 Bruce Barton Pump Service,Inc. Water Pump P.epair-Saratoga Gap Open Space Preserve ,74 900.00 California Advocates, Inc. Legislative Consultant' s Fee-Oct. 75 80.00 California Park & Recreation Membership Fee Society, Inc. 16 459. 70 Communications Research Co. Installation. of Radio and Repairs 177 300.00 Susan Cretekos Patrol Services-Oct. 778 57.99 Creutzburg, Inc. Equipment Identification Tags 19 98.17 The Dark Room Photo Processing f'80 506.90 First Interstate Bank of CA Note Paying Agent-1982 Series '81 25.99 Foster -Bros. Security System Keys '82 122.19 Herbert Grench Local P1eal Conference, Seminar and Benefit Payment `83 565.64*'Lawrence Tire Service, Inc. Tires for District Vehicle 84 282.13 Charlotte MacDonald Reimbursement for Prints and Office Furniture '85 81. 73 Mobil Oil Gas for District Vehicles '86 10. 86 Monogram Industries, Inc. Shop Supplies' '87 39. 80 Stanley Norton Phone ,Copying and Meal Conference Expense '88 1,173.11 Pacific Telephone Telephone Service '89 156.91 Peninsula Office Supply Office SuoDlies '90 63. 11 Pitney Bowes Postage Meter Rental '91 40,476.00 Plant Insultation. Co. Removal of Asbestos Materials- . Hassler '92 101.96 Rancho Hardware and Garden Shop Paint,Shoa and Plumbing Supplies 193 403. 22 Shell Oil Co. Gas and Repairs for District Vehicles 94 63.26 Stevens Creek Surplus Department Utility Truck Box for Cleaning Store Supplies '95 298.20 Vanier Graphics Corp. Printing of Purchase Orders '96 392.45 Xerox Xerox Supplies Meeting 63-2 7 Novemt 9,19 8 3 Asount Name Description '97 $ 208. 80 San Francisco Water Dept. Water Service-Hassler 98 . 42.25 Basalt Sand and Rock Nursery Plants-Monte Bello Open Space Preserve 199 400.00 Foss and Associates- Personnel Consulting Fee-Oct. 1.00 78.50 Lynda Rose Trimming and Cleaning of Roadside and Ditches-Coal Creek Open Space'Preserve 01 17.07 Norney's Office Supplies ":02 20,000.00 Mrs. Jane Stallings Balance of Purchase Price D3 4#731.00 Sorgdrager Trucking Bond Payments for Hassler Demolition 04 13. 33 .Sears,Roebuck and Co. Vacuum Hose for Ranger *Office ' 05 610.00 SGS,Inc.. Road Re»air-Coal Creek. Omen Space Preserve D6 *26,896.61 San Francisco Federal Savings Ross -Realty Trust Fund-Burns m and Loan Association Property Purchase 07 380.00 County of San Mateo Permit Fee-Hassler Buildings Demolition 08 1,423.00 Keller and Daseking,Architects Architectural Services-Hassler 09 203. 75 Petty Cash Drafting Materials ,Environmental ".: Confere,,pce,,Mi.scellaneous Office Suppplies,•Topo Ilap,Photo Album, Subscription,Local Heal Conferences Photo Processing,Private Vehicle - ` Expense,Gas for Courier,and. PCC Seminars - Note : This is the payment of accumulated Real Estate Commission allocation withheld from Ross Realty dispute since 1978 because of a' puce by two other parties over paym ent. This matter is now b eing resolved by a law suit between -those parties', and they have agreed to a neutral depository. f' /� �. �, <� � �- � a _. f ,� '. �,� �, �.�_.... -y. Ir,.;�� .� , . .+wwr�w� ,. j ' ����� �S �}�� 3 � e ���� „� .-f�...---- _ . ___. ._. ��.�.. . .. Claims 83-23 Revised Meeting 83-30 Amount Name Decer �ercl- ,t3n$3 5889 $ 91. 85 San Francisco Water Department Water Service-Hassler 5890 . 314.28 Shell Oil Co. Gas and Repair for District Vehicles 5891 363.60 Signs of the Times Signs-Los Trancos and Monte Bello Open Space Preserv-es 5892 69.19 William Tannenbaum Office Equipment 5893 78.64 Uno Graphics Brochures-Windy Hill Open Space Preserve 5894 154.00 Valley Title Co. Preliminary Title Report 5895 33.66 Alice Watt Private Vehicle Expense 5896 338. 36 Xerox Maintenance Agreement and Usage Charge 5897 400.00 Foss and Associates Personnel Consulting Fees-Nov. 5898 3,000.00 Clevenger Realty Appraisal Co. Appraisal Consultant 5899 27, 99.88 Susan Cretekos Patrol Services-Windmill Pasture 5900 2- -,-��}4 - Sylvin Emerson Purchase of Leasehold Interest- Partial Payment 5901 48,000.00 First American Title Land Acquisition-Mariscal Guaranty Co. Property 5902 41.42 ZZZ Sanitation Co. Portable -Toilets-Hassler 5903 371. 69 Hawkins-Hawkins Co. , Inc. Metal Signs 5904 297.20 Hertz Equipment Rental Tractor Rental 5905 159. 75 Langley Hill Quarry Road Repairs 5906 115.50 Los Altos Garbage Co. Dumpster Service-Ranger Office 5907 12,500.00 Robert MacDougall, Jr. Appraisal Services 5908 4,000.00 Metro Real Estate, Research Appraisal Services 5909 356.08 On-Line Business. Svstems , Inc. Computer Services-Oct. 5910 328.53 PG and E Utilities 5911 121.00 Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Equipment Installation and Permit- Bean House ''5912 1,049 . 74 Pacific Telephone Telephone Service 15913 6.00 Rancho Cobbler & Cleaner Ranger Uniform Repair 5914 70.00 Recreation and Park Conference Registration Fee-H. Grench 5915 221. 94 SGS, Inc. Repair Work-Skyline Blvd. Rental Unit 5916- 579. 11 . Scotts Valley Sprinkler & Pipe Field and Shop Supplies Supply 5917 8.99 . Sears , Roebuck and Co. Repair Saw 5918 47. 71 Union Oil Co. Gas for District Vehicle 5919 208. 39 Rich Voss' Trucking, Inc. Sand,Base Rock and Trucking Charge I Cl s 83-23 Me, _ng 83-30 I?ecembedr vise 14, 1983 e MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT C L A I M S Amount Name Description 5861 $ 50.00 Association of Environmental District Dues Professionals 5862 9.03 Barron Park Supply Co. Plumbing Supplies 5863 74.23 Bullard Safety West Ranger Uniform Accessories 5864 900.00 California Advocates , Inc. Legislative Consultant Fee-Nov. 865 93. 80 Clark' s Auto Parts, Inc. District Vehicle Maintenance 5866 213.00 Communications Research Co. Radio Maintenance Service 5867 7.02 Crest Copies Blue Lines �5868 46.03 H.S. Crocker, Inc. Office Supplies 869 160.00 Jim Drivers , Road Repairs-Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve 870 108.96 The Frog Pond Meal Conferences ;871 25.40., Mary ..qundert.' , Private Vehicle Expense 872 9.95 Harbinger Communications Computer Services-Mailing List 5873 500.00 Suzanne Hennacy Refrigerator for Rental Unit 874 338.40 Hipp Welding, Inc. Sign Brackets 875 25.43 Hubbard and Johnson Shop Supplies 876 35.00 Steve Hurst Private Vehicle Expense 877 142.98 Image Technology, Inc. Map Mylars 878 565.64 Lawrence Tire Service, Inc. Tires for District Vehicles 879 13. 31 Los Altos Stationers Fil e Folders 880 26.56 Minton's Lumber h Supply Shop and Hardware Supplies 881 87. 79 Mobil Oil Co. Gas for District Vehicles 882 62.88 Noble Ford Tractor, Inc. Supplies for Tractor 5883 84. 70 Stanley Norton October Expenses-Phone,Copying, I Meal Conferences 5884 124.01 Norney' s Miscellaneous Office Supplies 885 5. 01 City of Palo Alto Utilities 886 1, 109.51 Peninsula Oil Co. Gas for District Vehicles i887 109.45 Peninsula Times Tribune Printing of " Financial Statement and Legal Ads i888 25.41 Rancho Hardware & Garden Shop Miscellaneous Shop Supplies Claims 83-23 - Revised "meeting 83-30 cember 14, 1983 6 Amount Name Description 15920 $ 89. 78 West Coast Shoe, Co. Uniform Boots 5921 32.00 Del Woods Private Vehicle Expense 5922 557.82 Herbert Grench NRPA Computer Workshop , -Meal Conference and Benefit Payment 5923 30.95 Suzanne Shipley Computer Course 5924 5 ,000.00 James C. Morrit ,Bob Whalen, and Balance of Purchase Ptice-Depew Terry Depew Acquisition 5925 5,625.00 Rogers , Vizzard and Tallett Professional Legal Services-Oct. 5926 265. 72 Petty. Cash Office Supplies,Meal Conferences, MaDs,Subscriptions ,Film Development,Meeting Room` Rental for 12-7 Meeting, and Private Vehicle Expenses. I 'WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Meeting 30 Dec. 14 , ,83 il Family Homes for the Adult Retarded HORIZME 901 North Road, Belmont, Ca. 94002 (415) 593-2516 ED F.H.A.R.—FAMILY HOME ADULT RETARDED Board of Directors Mid Peninsula Regional Open Space District 375 Distel Circle, Suite D-1 Los Altos, California 94022 December 9, 1983 Subject: Rancho San Antonio Upper House Dear Board Members, On behalf of F.H.A.R. ,Inc. (Family Homes for the Adult Retarded) , I would like to express our interest in the disposition of the Rancho San Antonio Upper House. Due to the withdrawl of our original proposal to lease on- site, FHAR has subsequently developed a second proposal for the removal of the house. If therefore, a compatible proposal to lease the house on- site is not selected,our agency would greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss our proposal for removal. Briefly outlined below are the components of our proposal to remove the house: 1 . Purpose FHAR proposes to have the house relocated to a site in San Carlos for the purpose of providing and promoting a shared housing living arrangement for developmentally disabled adults. 2. Cost Following is a cost assessment for the removal of the house: Removal and Set up. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 90,000. (bid submitted by L.W.Enterprise/ Atlantic House Mover, Inc.) Assessment and Alteration costs . . . . . . . . . 30,000. TOTAL REMOVAL/SET UP COST. . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 120,000.** **FHAR has raised over one half of this cost ($70,000) 3. Land Should this project materialize, FHAR has received as a gift a plot of land in San Carlos which is suitable for the Rancho San Antonio Upper House. That property is already zoned for group home use. 4 . Environmental Impact The house would be removed through the Mora Gate exit, completely minimizing any negative impact on the Open Space District. Once the house was removed, the Open Space property would return to its natural state. (FHAR—a non-profit organization dedicated to helping the adult retarded) -2— In closing, should you choose to further investigate this proposal it would be a great pleasure to meet with you. At that time I would then present to you the details of this project. FHAR is grateful for your consideration and review of this idea statement, and we look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, David M. Curson Executive Director DMC/jr cc: H. Grench, General Manager D. Hansen, Land Manager H. Bronstein, President, FHAR Board of Directors WRITTEN COMMUNICATI( Meeting 83-30 Dec. 14 , 1983 WALLACE I. SAMPSON, M.D. INTERNAL MEDICINE HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY 515 SOUTH DRIVE, SUITE 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW,CALIFORNIA 94040 TELEPHONE 415/961-5548 November 10, 1983 Director, Mid-Peninsula Park District 375 Distel Circle suite Dl Los Altos, California 94022 Re: Six Rivers Ranch and School I have known the owners and directors of the Six Rivers Ranch and School for the past nine years. They are, in my opinion, responsible, capable, and intelligent members of the education community who have done a fairly remarkable job in the education of their students. It gives me pleasure to recommend them highly in their endeavors, and to recommend that they be allowed to use whatever space and buildings can be made available to them. Sincerely yours, Wallace I. Sampson, M.D . WIS:el M-83-138 (meeting 83-30 AA, December 14 , 1983) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM December 6 , 1983 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; D. Woods, Open Space Planner; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Final Adoption of Use and Management Plans for Costanoan Way and El Sereno Open Space Preserves Introduction: At your October 26 , 1983 meeting, the use and management plans for Costanoan Way and El Sereno Open Space Preserves were pre- sented to you (see report R-83-43, dated October 19 , 1983) . You tentatively adopted the report with the exceptions as noted below. Final adoption was deferred until your December 14 , 1983 meeting. Discussion: At your October 26 meeting, a discussion centered on the parking situation at the end of Montevina Road. The possibility of receiving assistance from the Santa Clara County Transportation Department for surfacing and widening the road, District funding of the project if County Transportation shows no interest in the project, and various methods of amending the brochure to reflect the current parking problem in the interim, were discussed. Following the meeting, staff sent a letter to the Santa Clara County Transportation Department requesting consideration of the road improvement project. A copy of the letter is attached. On December 6, 1983 , staff met on site with representatives of the Transportation Department. They agreed to 1) clearing the loose material from the area directly in front of the gate and 2) smoothing out and adding base rock to a 6 foot shoulder of the road at the location 250 feet east of the gate. These two improvements will provide reasonably safe parallel parking for 4 vehicles . They indicated that any additional and substantial grading and surfacing in the easterly area would most probably encroach on private property, create an undesirable and unmanageable hangout, and be a project considered low priority for funding. They did, though, agree that if the District felt the proposed 6 foot widened shoulder should be surfaced at a later date, they could accommodate us at an estimated cost to the District of $600. Regarding modifying the brochure to reflect the current parking situation, the current brochure will be revised and reprinted, and the existing in-stock brochures held until the parking situation is remedied. M-83-138 Page two The use and management plan as contained in report R-83-43 should be amended as follows : A. Access and Circulation New Use and Management Recommendations 1 . District staff has approached the Santa Clara County Trans- portation Department to request an improvement to the surfacing of Montevina Road in the vicinity of the gate. In addition, a widening of the northerly shoulder of the road within the sixty foot right-of-way approximately 200 feet east of the gate should be done. If widened and resurfaced, the two areas would accommodate 4-6 vehicles. County Transportation has agreed to make minor improvements to the two areas . After completion of the project, District staff will evaluate the condition of the easterly roadside shoulder and if it is determined not to be reasonably safe, request the County to add surfacing. Cost is estimated at $600 and will be included in FY 84-85 budget preparation. C. Brochure A brochure is currently available at the District office. However, in light of the current parking situation at the end of Montevina Road, the brochure will be modified to reflect the current situation until the parking can be improved. Recommendation: I recommend you adopt the use and management plan contained in report R-63-43 as amended herein. M * ! �� - \r ::; 6�k MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 375 DISTEL CIRCLE,SUITE D-1,LOS ALTOS,CALIFORNIA 94022 (415)965-4717 l;ovenmber 14, 1983 Road Operations 1555 Berger Drive San Jose, CA 95112 I am writing to request consideration of a road improvement project at the end of :4ontevina Road, located in unincorporated Santa Clara County, southwest of the Town of Los Gatos. The MUdpeninsula Regional Open Space District currently manages the 1036 acre E1 Sereno Open Space Preserve which extends westerly from Montevina road to Bohlman Road and northerly to the Town of Los Gatos. Currently, public access to the Preserve is limited to the County maintained Montevina Road, as the remaining con- necting routes are considered private or semiprivate. ,%.ontevina Road is gated at the Preserve entrance and, because of steep rugged terrain, there is no parking available within the Preserve. Visitors to the Preserve have in the past parked in front of the qate along the shoulder of the road. This area is quite small and difficult to park on because of its steepness and loose gravelly condition. The District's Board of Directors has requested staff to explore, With your assistance, the possibility of making two improvements to the end of Montevina Road to ensure public safety. The first suggestion is the surfacing of the area immediately in front of the gate so vehicles will have better traction for parking and turning around. Secondly, we would like to request the widening of a small section of the northerly shoulder, located approximately 250 ' east of the gate (see attached map) . This area lends itself to parking 2 or 3 vehicles and involves a minimum of work. We have been asked to return to our Board with suggestions as to how to proceed by December 14, 1983 . We would appreciate a response from you as soon as possible. We would be happy to meet with you on site at your convenience. Sincerely, Del Woods Open Space Planner M,. j c Attach . Hertel A G'e General Valawer Board of D:rec.':3.'s.Ka'nenne Duty.Barbara Green.Nonette G Han%o.Richard S Bishop-Ecwarc G Sneiiey.Harry A Tamer.Can, G :"«3^C:n M-83-140 Meeting 83-30 Dec . 14 , 1983 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM December 6, 1983 TO: Board of Directors FROM: 11. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Final Adoption of Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve Use and Management Plan Introduction: At your November 9, 1983 meeting the use and management plan for Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve was presented to you (see report R-83-45, dated November 1, 1983) . At the meeting, changes were made regarding the timing of the next use and management review and presentation of a specific plan for developing parking. It was stated the next complete review would be scheduled in 1985 and that the speci- fic plan for parking would be brought before you in summer, 1984 . In addition, a question was raised regarding timing on installation of the fencing and stile at the Kennedy Road access. The recommendation below reflects the change in wording as discussed at the meeting. a. Access and Circulation Existing Use and Management Plan 3 . Staff will prepare a plan to replace the chain link fencing at the Kennedy Road access with more appropriate fencing, gate and stile. Status: Plans have been delayed so as to insure that any im- provements rovements in this area will integrate into the overall plans for improved parking facilities. (Fencing and hiking-equestrian stiZe wiZZ be instalZed in spring 1984 once meetings with the Town of Los Gatos are underway and the Zocation of the proposed parking area has been determined. ) Final adoption of the use and management plan was deferred until your December 14 meeting to allow for public comment. Staff has received comments from a neighbor reaffirming the problem already mentioned in the plan regarding increasing mountain bicycle use of the trails and potential conflicts with equestrians and hikers. Recommendation: I recommend you adopt the use and management plan for the Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve as contained in report R-83-45 and amended herein, including the dedication of the 21 acre P.M. and Associates property, the renaming of the Preserve to Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve, and the combining of area names within the Preserve. M-83-141 (Meeting 83-30 A. December 14 , 1983) • MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM December 8 , 1983 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; D. Woods, Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Request for Proposals for a Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve Master Plan Introduction: At your meeting of December 7 , 1983 (see report R-83-48, dated November 28 , 1983) , you reviewed and tentatively approved the use and management plan for the Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve and a draft Request for Proposals (RFP) for a proposed master plan for the Preserve. Due to time constraints, final approval of the RFP was scheduled for your December 14 meeting. In addition, on December 14 , a selection committee of Board members for the project should be appointed. Peninsula Open Space Trust (P.O.S.T. ) representatives in the selection process are the Board of Trustees members Paul Reimer, Robert Brown, Vince Garrod, and Robert Augsburger. Discussion: iscu sion: Due to the intense interest from planning firms in this t need project a and he ee to select the most appropriate firm, the selection process has been streamlined to narrow down the number of detailed proposals to be reviewed. An RFP will be sent out by December 15 , 1983 to all interested and pertinent firms in the area in the form of a letter of interest. The draft is attached for your review and approval . All pertinent experience, staffing, and other material must be received by the end of December. The six best firms qualified for this job will then be selected in early January and required to submit their proposals by February 6 , 1984 . The detailed proposals will then be scrutinized by the selection committee, a firm chosen, and a contract signed in late February. Final approval of the plan will occur in December 1984 . Recommendation: I recommend that you review and approve the attached proposal material and direct staff to solicit Requests for Proposals as given in this report with the assistance of P,O.S.T, for the master planning of Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. I also recommend that you select three Board members to sit on a selection committee for this project. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS LETTER OF INTEREST Project Title: Master Plan for Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve Project Description: The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District wishes to employ a consultant to prepare a master plan for the Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. The intent is to plan compre- hensively for long term open space and recreational use of this undeveloped site. Emphasis will be placed on maximizing public recreational use, the preservation of natural features, and creation of a phased development and management plan. A consultant will be retained by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (hereafter referred to as District) and will work under the direction of the District's Land Manager, or other persons so designated by the General Manager. The funding for this project has been raised by the Peninsula Open Space Trust (hereafter referred to as POST) , which has obtained grants from a number of foundations for the project. It is anticipated that this project will be awarded and a contract signed to proceed in February 1984 , with work to be concluded and approved by POST and the District Board of Directors in December 1984 . Consultant Qualifications This invitation is being sent to those landscape architectural, architectural, or planning firms known to be qualified to perform the described project. Primary consideration will be given to those firms which can demonstrate successful past experience in similar design and management projects related to public park and open space properties. The principals of this applicant firm shall be licensed in the State of California and its subconsultants shall likewise be licensed to practice their particular speciality. Invitations are going to qualified firms throughout the Bay Area, but firms within the District will be given priority consideration. The District is an equal opportunity employer and will require the consultant to provide evidence of past and ongoing efforts to assure that no discrimination is made in the employment of persons because of sex, race, color, religion or the national origin of such person, and of past and ongoing efforts to involve minority business enter- prises in the performance of its services . Submittal Requirements and Procedure Applicants should submit on not more than 20 pages the following information: 1) A letter of interest in the proposal, including time to be spent on the project in relation to overall workload. 2) Qualification of the firm and persons to be working on the project. 3) The name of the principal who will be in charge of the project. 4) Subconsultants with pertinent qualifications should also be identified. 5) A record of experience in past projects of a similar nature. 6) Any other information which you feel would be of assistance in choosing your firm over others, such as awards, design philosophy, or graphic examples of work. The above information shall be submitted to the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, to the attention of Mr. David Hansen, Land Manager, and shall be postmarked no later than December 30, 1983. Six firms will be selected in early January 1984 from the interested applicants and asked to submit a conceptual project approach, work program, and fee schedule by early February 1984 . The detailed proposals will be based on the scope of services and selection procedure which follows . The winning firm will then be chosen and a contract awarded within approximately two weeks of submittal . Scope of Consultant Services 1) Consultant will complete an analysis of existing natural and cultural resources and improvements . This should include but not be limited to: *Assessment of community's recreational needs through public hearings, OEvaluation of California Environmental Quality Act as it pertains to this project, OMeeting with appropriate permit granting agencies and municipalities, *Surveys of natural and man-made features, leases, easements, and utilities in a written and pictorial form. An initial detailed study has been prepared by a biologist and is available for review at the District office. 2) The District Board will hold public hearings in the course of the planning process at which the consultant will be present to make presentations and solicit input to the plan. The number of hearings will be determined by the amount of public interest and will in- clude a minimum of one hearing to solicit input for potential site use and a second to review and respond to a draft master plan. 3) Various meetings between the consultant and District will be held as necessary and will include POST when appropriate. Presentations should be made of both conceptual and final master plans to the appropriate governing bodies. 4) The master plan should address long-term (15-20 years) planning for the enhancement of the natural environment and consideration of the developed features of the site. It should propose future uses and improvements which would be consistent with general District goals and policies, but not necessarily limited to existing site use and improvement policies. The master plan should show alternative creative ways of utilizing the site. A scenario could include more intensely developed open space facilities and uses than the District currently manages so long as it does not conflict with the District's concept of open space and the natural character of the land. For example, future uses which would be compatible could be an equestrian facility, campgrounds, youth hostel, interpretive center, etc. Uses which are legitimate recreation uses but which would not be compatible, however, would be such things as an off-road vehicle site, shooting range, band- stand, multi-purpose irrigated ballfields, etc. The plan should address potenti,_ impacts on adjacent park _.id open space preserves, private neighbors, and the Skyline Scenic Corridor in general . 5) The master plan shall include design concepts and schematic site plans through drawings, text, maps, and other support materials showing all the major components of the proposed plan and estimated costs of construction. Significant changes in design of existing structures and any proposed new structures will require sketch plans and cost analysis . A detailed phasing plan for development and implementation of the master plan shall also be required. 6) Consideration should be given to potential impacts the plan may have on' the District' s current management program and should include the general feasibility of a management program which could include management by other agencies or private groups . 7) Consultant' s final report must be received and acted upon by the District's Board of Directors by December 1984 . A detailed time- table of how and when the work will be accomplished should be provided by the proposer. Final Proposals Review and Selection 1) A selection committee consisting of representatives of the District's Board of Directors and staff, POST, and possibly local city or county park and recreation departments will evaluate the firms and final proposals in February 1984 . 2) Proposals will be evaluated according to the specificity, clarity and comprehensiveness of the project plan and %its responsiveness to the described scope of work to be performed. 3) The consultant' s proposal shall be presented in two Darts, consisting of 1) personnel and firm qualifications, and a conceptual project approach and work program, and 2) a fee schedule. Each is to be submitted in separate envelopes and clearly identified as stated above. 4) The proposals can include any information that you feel might aid the selection committee in ascertaining your qualifications . In addition to basic information, consultants should present specific written and/or graphic information relating to their approach to satisfy the requirements of this project. 5) Primary consideration will be given to the demonstrated competence and prior experience of the consultant and the ability of the consultant to bring adequate staff and facilities into the project to ensure successful completion of the project. 6) The selection committee will invite the finalists to be interviewed, allowing approximately 30 minutes for presentation and questions. 7) The District's Board of Directors will act upon the recommendations made by the selection committee and authorize the General Manager to enter into contract with the selected consultant. 8) POST and its grantors must approve of the consultant selected by the District, the specific work program, and line item budget. District Backgrount- .end Policies The Midpeninsula Regional open Space District is an independent, special district created in 1972 by the voters of northwestern Santa Clara County and joined by southern San Mateo County in 1976 . The purpose of the District is to acquire the preserve open space lands in the foothills and baylands . The boundaries of the District generally extend from San Carlos to Los Gatos, and from the San Francisco Bay to Skyline Ridge. The land is preserved for a variety of reasons, including protection of flora and fauna, agricultural production, preserving areas of scenic beauty and the scenic backdrop, shaping urban growth, ensuring public safety, environmental education, and recreation. The District follows a land management policy that provides proper care of open space land, allowing public access appropriate to the nature of the land and consistent with ecological values . As land is acquired, the District works to make it accessible to the public. Initial recreational development is primarily low intensity recreation such as hiking, riding, and nature study. The ultimate development is envisioned as that which maximizes recreational opportunities while insuring protection of important natural values of open space. This will preclude such facilities as large ball fields, golf courses or tennis complexes. The District seeks arrangements with other governmental agencies or private groups whereby they provide some or all development and supervision of recreational facilities. The District currently has 23 preserves totally approximately 14 ,500 acres. Of these, 8 have public staging areas with trail systems ; the remaining 15 are considered undeveloped. Site Information - Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve The 890 acre Preserve is an integral part of a vast amount of public open space along the Skyline Scenic Corridor. It is located at the intersection of Alpine Road and Skyline Boulevard, which is a center point within the District's Skyline holdings. The site potentially offers access to over 6600 acres and eight different preserves. The natural features of the Preserve are those common to the Santa Cruz Mountain region. The terrain is gentle to steep, and vegetation types range from oak woodland to Douglas fir forest. There are a number of improvements on the Preserve, including 1) a network of roads and trails, 2) a developed water system and reservoirs, 3) an operating Christmas tree farm, and 4) various ranch and residential structures . Portions of the Preserve are currently leased and, because some of these leases are long-term, require special planning considerations . Attachments : A) A master plan for the Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve by POST B) A U.S .G.S . site map C) The MROSD all site brochure Attachment "A" A MASTER PLAN FOR THE SKYLINE RIDGE OPEN SPACE PRESERVE (by Peninsula Open Space Trust) The Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve lies at the center of a most successful local effort to preserve a wilderness environment adjacent to an urban area. This 888-acre preserve was acquired early in 1982 by a public agency, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the District) . Located at the intersection of Sk7line, Alpine and Page Mill Roads and in the center of 7,000 acres of public land, Skyline Ridge Preserve is the logical focal point for recreational use. The challenge lies in developing recreational opportunities which best meet the needs of two million nearby residents and yet still afford a wilderness experience for the visitor. THE PROPERTY Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve is located primarily within unincorporated - San Mateo County, with a small portion being within Santa Clara County. (See map attached) . The land itself is unique. From Highway 35 it rises sharply to a 2,500 foot peak, one of the highest in the Santa Cruz Mountains. From that point, there are unsurpassed views of the publicly owned wilderness areas to the east and to the west, and of the ranchlands and vast forested ridges which sweep down to the Pacific Ocean. Three man-made lakes are found on the property--an unusual water feature in this part of mountainous California. However, the site may be best knc-wn for its Christmas tree farm which is visited annually by thousands of Peninsula families as their source for a personally-cut tree. The property is primarily undeveloped land with two exceptions. First, a cluster of four houses and accessory structures is located in the western portion accessible from Alpine Road and is retained as is under a 50 year lease to the former property owner. Another area has a ranch style house, stable, garage, small rental cabin, tennis court , and several auxiliary buildings, including a floating dock and a boathouse on the shore of a reservoir. This general area is envisioned as the site for the more intensive building oriented uses proposed in a master plan. POTENTIAL DEVELOPME,;T Because of the enormous opportunities available at Skyline Ridge Preserve, the District's Board of Directors has it listed as the top priority development project . lts central location and diversity of landscape make the area suitable for campsites , picnic areas and multi-use trails. As a midpoint in District lands , Skvline Ridge could be used as the key place for a ranger station and corporation yard for equipment and supplies. Portions of the Christ-as tree -2- farm will provide educational opportunities for study a,; the --ren eventuany -eve- t) i :nor,-'- i to t%i ra 1 tit ate.t e- An o. L . [h(, I - eS t Z Z:k-) ::w*CL j)f the c0 :111ilutij ty 'S reCI-QaLiOn deeds. Possible facilities include a modest retreat LeIlLOr for community groups an! businesses; stables, a riding ring for equestrians, and a natural history center for the Santa Cruz -o u n ta i n s Although current District policy would preclude some of c,- .:_st-_ -uses, r�-- opportunity exists to lease portions of its property to private orga:�;_za:ions s.;ch as POST, the Environmental Volunteers, and A-erican Youzh Hostel, among c:hers. These organizations could assist with development through fundraising and later by managing the facilities. Development of the Preserve will require a unique and detailed master plan. Cerzain portions of the property, still under lease from the previous owners for varying terms, will necessitate a plan with a phased approach to development. In addition., tna planner will need to consider the community' s long-term, needs. An experienced land use planner should be hired immediately to develop the site plan so that in-plementation can begin as the first lease expire. Parameters for the master plan will be set such as time, costs, District require-ents, public input, legal restraints, location and tie-in with other agencies and C, 0 groups. The planning I organization would be jointly selected by the District-' and POST. POST will have input throughout the planning process with joint approval of the final site plan. PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP Over the years, the District and the Peninsula Open Space Trust (?OST) have demonstrated what the current Federal administration refers to as a public/private partnership. As a not-for-profit public benefit organization, POST has recently turned its efforts to the District's need for help with recreational development On QU I D11C Open space preserves. Projects have included a $10,000 contribution to build a parking lot on ILMontebello Open Space Preserve and most recently POST was successful in raising $20,000 more than the $50,000 campaign coal to build a trail on the District ' s Windy Hill Preserve. Over 100 people also volunteered to hel;) -.:i4 :h the trail building. Several "actors have contributed to POST's decision to seek- a grant for the Skyline Ridge Preserve 'Master Plan: 1 . POST' s goal of opening preserves to meet the communities' recreational needs; 2 . oil the enthusiastic response to the Windy Hill 7ra1' campaign, the potential of co-.Lnunity involvement and identity Dis:rrict sites and olf POST raising ft;nds fir recreational deve]OPMc:­-. -3- 3. Limited District staff resources and time to prepare the complex -_an :his project and site will require; ---a ali--ination of Land and Water Conservation Fund monies traditionally used by the District for development projects; z,gip_-r:unity to potentially open Skyline Ridge to uses beyond the District's current policy of limited passive recreation. one `sT-r-' zz will send out requests for proposals to planning firms for a plan that will a phased approach to developing the Preserve and will meet the cc=nit-.-'s recreational needs. In addition, the information in the report will provide --he basis for determining the means of financing Skyline Ridge's development. It is anticipaled that development will be financed through a combination of private Bending and fund-raising carried out in the community. The master plan '--e t-.e key document for planning financing, fund-raising, and the facilities --,: '--e developed. It will also determine the feasibility of leasing p2r:f:ns :,f 7'-e Preserve to private agencies for management, either on a concession er basis. kyl`ne _Ri_`ge Open Space Preserve can become a hub of activity for recreation whic`. will --ale 7 ,000 acres of open space and wilderness readily accessible to 2 million urban resident living a short distance away. G Vi L r 1�, r SA At FRANCISCO %i1D1'ENEtiSUL.A RF.G10',AL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT &AY .01 4... S{ +SAN MATED BAYUNOS EAST - •—��'S:: ;>.:ot y T. PA:O ALTO —• �- —. L �.j�a'•� BaY. 'ro GULCa _ o. PALO ALTO yt r!a r. PARKt• �. �'• Pa • S'EYEhi CaEEc 447.at S:L'.r ►A-A �•r �� MvL 1MN ra:pu �4y a �\vtEw r ALTOS HILLS % ,'� LOS 1�'h7Y t•:L_ ALTOS NN Park ,--• tiDr r+'� 2P.0 Bi a� \ COAL FOOTHILLS '- OUYENECK �i WHON i1 ''r.EK. �. �•; �V!NO,MIL hTONiD _ Mi.blElv'LlE }:A 1 — ?A TURF 74' TPA NGOa.. RarCM San SUSSJr ?-:SE MONTE SELLO Awon.a Park" PAGE MILL RD. +� \,pa k:u'= _ AREA park, y ^� r SKYLINE RIDGE Spark PI"•E r Park l RAhCN i g w«: ARATOGA FY5:3:!'J Ct!!a mark : � v�_'t. �'r LONG GAP P!'i 'a RIDGE $s,3.iTOGA P)rIola I r a ' / Par% v .•d S.ra W'Ar � Dd•. � CdS'e Rock t?d v:r'a':: ry Park _ Sa'"7rn A•:... .-`rL rq.h7l '�o Dark LLix c C:EEK tIYEA ih cfa-r,r- EAh•:K SCALE IN MILES t 0 1 2 3 4 5 �3.`A`�.ts' ;�- 1� � •..._ -•�.� �� '��bp'��r i �\`�J,,,.1��� \'.•�� _ \.✓i?erg ii. "� =:��i__-� !r���t� __ -'•' /`- �\\ � - e�k a s "'�� +���7/` ate''"\� , Jr' � \Sorel Htllz w° ' ► ' i - ^:: �Hikin Stiie� 2\) _ f _ __�� _ �.ter•+±-�=�-r--�'-'� r/ L 11 n " BM L Closed Area Pr Privat \ i Hikingi -\ Resideia�es ` �, r- eta zi s �aA\—'Y�e ti, � �� l � ;. •. .% ��J,� � `��`I�l � �'.l\ �Sv ,�^F.J rS�'� ��•,'}��` � ' ._.. °1 '� � /� l ,.\ Ilk ����_ _ � _7 •; � _�'^ �. ;l, !�� `�_ � `\l �. ;.� ti � ,,fi�ee `� ■% Vr 8r'1 10r" ,���. / �, 1 \ \ ./ / i... ✓ ,vim `� .� ` t ��/ ;'.ref � L� �N �%- �� \rf /��,�� l i`✓''\ ���\t tom,.. -� ,:` � , \. << �"�-J�_ \✓ ,+ r� Q) "1�"• �.' � 1'���/ ) .,„ � - '1 j,O,! ��C_ :;t�, „� , ;; ,lei r'� 1✓^ •� --. .� ■ ` �.. t\ �:�\� ,a� `i�b��/�,;��'��\,� C( � �.... ,,��i/elm,�,� C,.1/Y� ,. \ \ �\ r '•� "` \ i� /wee (��� _,ri `-�'`� A\�V,,f�'�\� tl, ��sl--' ?1 ://I �� � ` � 0 � r� r' �.,�•� "�i'J,r t'�i,��t� \`.�.�(�r \\ ` .O \A\. w• 1.CI-. .�. �'1U 4-w[f �[ 1 r�J �J J� �'--��-�-- � ^�' `�J /'�\._ S- .: - ��p .e...< t �$ a mtn:�- ■� 'J���""� J� �'-�-��+ - � _ .. `""-v C ��-cam �' 1 r Portola Los > y Altos Hills.. \'j' �� z �•", , �� �(� SKYLINE RIDGE ' PEN 1 SPACE PRESERVE n, a-�, } ,u c Pemanerte ..,�,• =- `"'�T—=4' +� _ _ _ Hiking/ )gmstrian •� ..,ae _ �- \�\ 1��`�r TrailsIt r c ,_ � \ . fd«• ,� \ � �i� �� Private Residences I r _.` '; r >> ':1 �f�,r'� j' (Please observePan�� N. residents privacy I R `,... <'.� i ;• J- f�• "t = 2000North Scale 1 R-83-51 (Meeting 83-30 December 14 , 1983) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT December 8, 1983 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: C. Britton, Land Acquisition Manager; W. Tannenbaum, Real Property Representative; D. Hansen, Land Manager SUBJECT: Proposed Addition to Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve, Mt. Umunhum Area (Mariscal Property) Introduction: The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District has been offered the opportunity to purchase approximately 40 acres of land located east of Highway 17 in an unincorporated area of Santa Clara County. The property is situated east of Mr. Umunhum between the peaks of Mt. Umunhum and Bald Mountain. Acquisition will not only help protect the open space resource in the area; but, more particu- larly, will preserve a section of the Mt. Umunhum Road corridor leading to the Mountain. The property overlooks the Almaden Valley and southern San Jose. A. Description of the Site. 1. Size, Location and Boundaries . This 40 acre property is located south of the City of San Jose and is partially bounded by the District ' s Mt. Umunhum area of the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve to the east and private property along the remaining property limits (see attached map) . Located outside the District 's boundary but within the District' s Sphere of Influence, the property is also within the Sphere of Influence of the City of San Jose. Loma Almaden (Mt. Umunhum) Road cuts through the southerly portion of the property. The property is approximately 22 miles southwest of the inter- section of Loma Almaden Road and Hicks Road. The summit of Mt. Umunhum is one-third mile due west of the property. 2. Topography, Geology and Natural Landscape. The property is comprised of two north-facing ridges and an intervening canyon. The southern portion of the site nearest Loma Almaden Road is moderately sloped with a level grassy area. The northern reaches of the site are much steeper; and an inter- mittent tributary to Guadalupe Creek is located in the north- western corner of the site. R-83-51 Page Two Elevations range from 2400 feet along the southern border to approximately 1600 feet to the north. Vegetation on the property is characteristic of this region of the Santa Cruz Mountains and Sierra Azul. Chaparral communities of manzanita, ceanothus, chamise, and an occasional knob cone pine (Pinus Attenuatta) predominate the dry hot slopes of the ridges. B. Current Use and Development. Access to the site is from Loma Almaden Road which runs through the southern portion of the property. The site is contiguous to the 60-acre property recently acquired from McCoy. C. Planning Considerations. The property is zoned Hillside by the County of Santa Clara, which requires a 20 to 160 acre minimum lot size per dwelling unit based upon a slope density formula. Because the site is a separate legal ownership, the land would accommodate one building site. The site is currently under a Williamson Act agricultural contract which, according to the Government Code, would automatically ter- minate upon acquisition by a public agency. Open space use of the land is in conformance with the General Plans of the County of Santa Clara and the City of San Jose. The site did not receive a rating in the District's Master Plan since it lies outside the District boundaries. D. Potential Use and Management. The site should be managed as a natural area and be open to hikers and equestrians gaining access from Loma Almaden Road and adjoining properties. Parking for 2 to 3 cars is available at a roadside turnout adjacent to Loma Almaden Road where it enters the southwest boundary of the property. E. Interim Use and Management 'Recommendations. 1. Boundary plaques should be installed where appropriate. The cost is estimated at $30. 2. The site should be managed as a natural area and be open to hikers and equestrians. F. Dedication. This property should be withheld from dedication as Public open space to allow for future transfer of development rights. G. Naminq. This property should become an addition to the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve - Mt. Umunhum Area. R-83-51 Page Three H. Terms. The total purchase price stipulated in the attached Purchase Agree- ment will be $48,000 ($1200 per acre) payable in cash at the close of escrow. Funds for this purchase would come from the New Land Commitments budget category. Recommendation: I recommend you adopt the accompanying Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Authorizing Acceptance of Agreement to Purchase Real Property, Authorizing Officer to Execute Certificate of Acceptance of Grant to District, and Authorizing General Manager to Execute Any and All Other Documents Necessary to Closing of the Transaction (Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve Mariscal Property) . I further recommend you tentatively adopt the interim use and management recommendations contained in this report, including the naming, and that you indicate your intention to withhold the property from dedication. • ="�' � L"�`�.. �� ..�/ �_ �� � i� 1.��� � �• '-' %`•-'� /,(�% M, �'l. ��'- �� -`i.-. _ - �;.� i s f,•- / �/ ��_" .:/ '- .ice_. i ombro-so •�. �-./ �`✓,.L4/�-tip //!„ , � 5i99 `1 - ��\'z \�i ��'rr/l� �_ •ty:.. r � 1QQb6 _ 1 L� ,�._ �; 't,r� C(', jr� ,•j����\��, `\�- ���..�.� - /s...��°,�� �f�...Z�,. �;.�i"'=✓ice-.r'��!"``d.;^\ Ili i +jO ��1\lam\ '\JI J � '` `1` 1• J ( 11� \Cr III �' } pe....�s3a :•�. -� --.ram ,�2 d4 .\ (�� 1 , ��....� - �Mt. Umunhum i•,:�_.: �r,�� ,��-��//;��' � J�����- ), Area Proposed f -' Addition01 pw•� i x©��^� �? � _ ' {' � '' �`` /1'•, } _ -'Loma Almaden ,,�-�/ •�� �: � t � ��,, �, o�\'� •�: �;`' Road � � IR�I .S.D. Boundary E . Br• o l i Ir�CJr� Site Map i $� NUVNZANITA RIDGE lN %� l fs--JJ i ;,) ��' ,�,,.--`�,�•�,o �� � isp0''�,•%�%iJ"� � � � �--� OPEN SPACE PRESERVE + ti { Scale 1" = 2000' .North RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE REAL PROPERTY, AUTHORIZING OFFICER TO EXECUTE CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT TO DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY AND ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CLOSING OF THE TRANSACTION (SIERRA AZUL OPEN SPACE PRESERVE - MARISCAL PROPERTY) The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does resolve as follows; Section One. The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does hereby accept the offer contained in that certain Purchase Agreement between Nancy J. Mariscal et ux, and the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference made a part thereof, and authorizes the President or appropriate officers to execute the Agreement on behalf of the District. Section Two. The President of the Board of Directors or other appropriate officer is authorized to execute a certificate of acceptance to any deed (s) granting title to said property. Section Three. The General Manager of the District shall cause to be given appropriate notice of acceptance to the seller. The General Manager further is authorized to execute any and all other documents in escrow necessary or appropriate to the closing of the transaction. Section Four. The General Manager of the District is authorized to expend up to $1,000 to cover the cost of title insurance, escrow fees, and other miscellaneous costs related to this transaction. Section Five. The sum of $48,000 is hereby ordered to be withdrawn from the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 1982 Negotiable Promissory Notes Acquisition Fund for this Purchase. i I PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the undersigned individuals , hereinafter called "SELLER" and the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, hereinafter called "DISTRICT. " 1. PURCHASED PROPERTY SELLER agrees to sell to DISTRICT, and DISTRICT agrees to purchase from SELLER, SELLER'S real property located within an unincorporated area of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, consistinq of 40 acres, more or less, and commonly referred to as Santa Clara County Assessor's parcel number 562-07-017, being more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Said property to be conveyed together with any easements, rights of way"," or rights of use which may be appurtenant or attrib- utable to the aforesaid lands, and any and all improve- ments and/or fixtures attached or affixed thereto. 2. PURCHASE PRICE AND MANNER OF PAYMENT The total purchase price shall be Forty-Eight Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($48 ,000 . 00) payable in cash at such time as escrow may be closed and title conveyed to the DISTRICT under the terms and conditions set forth herein. 3. TITLE AND POSSESSION Title and possession of the subject property shall be conveyed to DISTRICT at the close of escrow by Grant Deed, free and clear of all liens , encumbrances , judgments , easements, taxes, assessments , covenants , restrictions, rights and conditions of record except: Taxes for the fiscal year in which this escrow closes shall be cleared and paid for in the manner required by Section 4986 of the Revenue and Taxation Code and such title exceptions as may be acceptable to DISTRICT. Purchase Agreement Nariscal-Richmond Page Two 4. COSTS DISTRICT shall pay all escrow, recording, and customary title insurance charges and fees incurred in this trans- action. SELLER shall be responsible for, and pay all costs of any reconveyance of Deed of Trust , full release of mortgage, payment of liens , discharge of" judgments , or any other charges , costs , or fees incurred in order to deliver marketable title to DISTRICT. 5. MILMISSIONS DISTRICT shall not have any obligation to pay any real estate agent 's commission or other related costs or fees in connection with this transaction. 6. ACCEPTANCE AND TERMS OF ESCRON c.i('b [ Provided that SELLER executes this Agreement on or before — December 4-, 1983 , DISTRICT shall have until December 15 , 1983 to accept and execute this Agreement, and during said neriod this instrwuent shall constitute an irrevo- cable offer by SELLER to sell and convey the aforesaid real property to DISTRICT for the consideration and under the terms and conditions herein set forth. As consideration for the tender of this offer, DISTRICT has paid and SELLER acknowledges receipt of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10. 00) . On condition that this Agreement is accepted and executed by DISTRICT, as above provided" , this transaction shall close through an escrow to be conducted by First American Title Guaranty Company, 445 South San Antonio Road , Los Altos, California 94022 (Escrow :;o. 550727) , or other such escrow holder as may be designated by DISTRICT. e_HCn'b To Time being of the essence this escrow shall close on or 12--/1-163 --before December ­34, 1983 . LEASES OR OCCUPANCY OF PREMISES SELLER warrants that there exist no oral or written leases or rental agreements affecting all or any portion of the INITIAL subject property, nor are any persons occupying the property . �n SELLER further warrants and agrees to holc DISTRICT free and �✓ harmless and to reimburse DIS�'RICT for any and all costs , liability, loss , damage or exoense , including costs for legal services , occasioned by reason of any such lease, rental agreement , or occupancy of the property being acquired by DISTRICT, including but not limited to claims for relocation benefits and/or payments pursuant to Cali=ornia Government Code Section 7260 et seq. SELLER understands and agrees that the provisions of this oaracraph shall survive the close of escrow and the recordation of any Grant Deed (s) . Purchase Agreement Mariscal-Richmond Page Three 8. ACCRUAL The provisions hereof shall accrue to the benefit of and bind the respective heirs, devisees, assigns or successors in interest of the parties hereto. MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE SELLER: DISTRICT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nancy J. Mariscal, who acquired title as Nancy J. Richmond Date: Stanley Norton, District Counsel- ACCEPTED FOR RECOMMENDATION: David Mariscal, Husband of Nancy J. Mariscal Date: W. S. Tannenbaum Real Property Representative APPROVED AND ACCEPTED: President, Board of Directors ATTEST: District Clerk Date: i EXHIBIT "A" All that certain property situated in the State of California, County of Santa Clara, and described as follows: PARCEL ONE: The west 1/2 of the east 1/2 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 8, township 9 south, range 1 east, M.D.B.&M. PARCEL TWO: A non-exclusive right of way, as appurtenant to Parcel One above or any portion thereof, for use as a roadway for vehicles of all kinds, pedestrians and animals, for crater, gas, oil and sewer pipe lines and for telephone, television service, electric light and power lines, together with the necessary poles or conduits, over a strip of land 60 feet wide, being a portion of the southeast 1/4 of section 8, township 9 south, range 1 east, M.D.B.&M., the center line of which is the center line of an existing (1970) road, and said center line is approximately described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of said center line of said existing road with the northerly line of the right of way for road purposes granted to the United States of America by deed recorded May 16, 1957, Book 3800 Official Records, page 1; thence from said point of beginning North 76° West, 160 feet; thence north 55' west 58 feet; thence north 80''`west , MO feet; thence north 40' west, 240 feet; thence south 70"west 270 feet; thence north 30' west, 162 feet; thence north 60° east to the west line of the east 1/2 of the southeast 1/4 of said section 8. The southwest and northeast lines of the southerly terminus of which right of way are shortened or lengthened to intersect the northerly line of said road *as so created in said deed to the United States of America and the northwest and south- east lines of the northerly terminus of which right of way are shortened or lengthened to intersect the westerly line of said east 1/2 of the southeast 1/4 of section a. R-83-52 (Meeting 83-30 December 14, 1983) ML MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT December 7 , 1983 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; D. Woods, Open Space Planner; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner SUBJECT: Annual Review of Relative Site Emphasis Plan and Use and Management Plan Review Schedule II Introduction: The Relative Site Emphasis Plan was last reviewed on December 8 , 1982 and received final adoption on January 12, 1983 (see reports R-82-48 , dated November 30, 1982, and M-83-7, dated January 3, 1983) . Included in those reports was the 1983 Use and Management Plan Review Schedule. The purpose in reviewing the Relative Site Emphasis Plan is to examine changes to factors used for determining the position of sites on the Relative Site Emphasis list, to include new additions, and to make adjustments accordingly. In addition, it is an opportunity to project comprehensively where staff efforts and funding in budget preparation will be directed on a site specific basis for the next fiscal year. The Use and Management Review Schedule relates to the proposed activities in the Plan for Relative Site Emphasis. In general, highly emphasized sites will be reviewed more often than less emphasized sites, although each site will be reviewed at least once within a two year period. Discussion: The format used for presenting the review of the Plan for Relative Site Emphasis has been modified since the last review. The left side of the chart remains the same in that it represents a list of all sites in a ranking order indicating the long term goal for their development. The list is based on current site emphasis factors which determine desirability of each site for use and recreational development. Changes that have occurred to the sites over the past year are re- flected in two ways : 1) the asterisk indicates that there have been additions to the site which could potentially affect the site 's ranking order, and 2) the italics mean that the position of the site has been changed, based on re-evaluation of conformance with the established criteria for site analysis as adopted in Addendum 1 of the Plan for Relative Site Emphasis (see memorandum M-82-45, dated May 6 , 1982) . i M-83-52 Page two This past year, the only change on this list is the moving upward of Whittemore Gulch Redwoods Open Space Preserve. According to the established criteria, particularly in regard to accessibility, manageability, and cost/benefit, the site should now be considered more highly emphasized. The major changes in format are on the right side of the chart, which depicts the more immediate approach to reaching the long term goals. It represents an annual projection of where development efforts will occur and a method of prioritizing these efforts, including funding priorities for fiscal year 1984-1985 . The categories listed at the top are the same, with the exception of "Special Facilities" , which now includes the former categories of restrooms and drinking water, as well as such things as picnic areas, backpack camps, etc. The remaining portion of the chart has been graphically presented to be more understandable. The major emphasis in fiscal year 1984-85, as shown by this chart, would be significant recreational improvements to Skyline Ridge, (although it is unclear how much implementation of the master plan will occur within fiscal year 1984-85) , Picchetti Ranch Area, Hassler, Kennedy Road Area, and the Whittemore Gulch Redwoods Preserve. At your meeting, staff will review this chart and summarize the types of projects which are shown for each site. In addition, issues affecting sites which are not scheduled for review in 1984 will be discussed. Recommendation: I recommend you tentatively adopt the revised Relative Site Emphasis Plan and the 1984 Use and Management Plan Review Schedule as contained in this report. Final adoption will be scheduled for January 11 , 1984 . PLAN FOR RELATIVE EMPHASIS OF DISTRICT SITES Funding Priorities for FY 84-85 N Longer Term Priorities for Emphasis , * - Recent site additions (1983) � o H i Cz a Ita 1.- Priority position changed ^'—" v n c¢"�". 1 Skyline Ridge OSP* 2. Monte Bello OSP 0 On2 0 �52 3 . Rancho San Antonio OSP 61 1!�1 4 • Los Gatos Not Yet A quire G o Creek Park .�. . (may (�`� 5. San Mateo Baylands Reserve O O `�Q 1 �✓ Q, �✓ 6 . Picchetti Ranch Area ""2 Q2 �2 1"1.q la 7. ,Sa.atoaa Gar) OOP* 0 0 8. Los Trancos OSP 0 O 9. Windy Hill OSPl 0 10. Hater` '!!�2 e2 e `-'2a 0!�a 0 11 . Fremont Older OSP Q2 Q2 18 0 Q a 12. Kennedy Road Ares:, e�a O 13 . Whittemore Gulch Redwoods OSP* Q Q2 r'`2 '""'2 G2 Q2 0 14 . Loncr Ridge QSP* Q2 Q2 Q 0 0 15. Russian Ridge OOP 0 0 O 0 Q O 16. Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area � O 17. Stevens Creek Shoreline Q1 Q1 Q1 wLa 18. Limekiln Canvon Area* 01 ®2 O 19. Coal Creek OSP* 0 O �&2 O 62a (� Q 0 i 20. El Sereno OSP � 21 . Foothills OSP 0 0 0 010 `�--� 22. THY xnewgod OSP Q� Q1 Q�ie `-' 23. Mt. Umunhum Area Q 0 O0 24 . � st,anc�an jc1'ay OSP0 O 0 0 V 0 0 25. Brig2s Creek `-' O O '`' 0 O 0 F - I 1 0 Adequately.provided by end FY 83/84 1. Currently in U « .M. pla',. High priority funding consideration 2. Not yet in U & M plan Moderate/low priority funding considerations . Potential alternative funding TWO YEAR USE .W MAiTAGnNFINT PLAN REVIEW SCfEDL�F Proposed Schedule to be Approved Now Pro;f,cted Schedule to be Reviewed 1984 November/Decanber 1985 L .St LA'.IING AREA Revi.wed JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JME JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MN FID MAR APR MAY ..rJNE JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1.R .:sler 7 27 3 X x 2.W. .�.ttemore Gulch 7 28 U� X 3.Lc ° Trancos 1 26 8. 6vi �ly Hill 10 12 83 Thcinewood 10/12/83 X Coa Creek 6/23/82 X 4.Ranc -.o S. Antoni 9/28/83 j X X Windi .11 Pasture 3/9/83 X Foott lls 3/9/83 X 5.YMSP-p. Mill 4/27/83 X X Picch�:,:ti 6/22/83 X X Sarato>ja Gap 7/27/83 I X 6.Skyliia Ridge* 1/27/83 X X Long Ridge 8/10/83 X X RussJ.an Ridge 8/24/83 X 7.Fram mt Older 1/13/82 X 8.E1 Soren 10/26/83 X Cost. Way 10/26/83 X 9.Manz. Ridge* 11/9/83 X 10,St.(.rk.S'line 3/24/82 X SM C.� . Baylands 3/23/83 X *Planning process to include public workshops due to anticipated significant changes in use and ranagment and increasing public interest. M-83-139 (Meeting 83-30 Dec. 14 , 1983) o 0 10=00M MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM December 8, 1983 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager PREPARED BY: C. MacDonald, Public Communications Coordinator SUBJECT: Bus Tour of District Lands for Public officials Introduction: The revised Action Plan for 1983-1984 , which you approved at your meeting of September 14 , 1983 , calls for a bus tour of District lands for public officials as a Key Project under the Public and Private Liaison Subprogram of the Public Communications Program. This project replaced the rotating schedule of informational presentations by Board members to public agencies as a top priority. Discussion: To meet its objective of acquainting as many government officials as possible with the District' s lands, activities, and goals, this project will require the fullest possible participation of Board and staff members. Therefore, staff needs the Board' s input in planning for the event as well as commitments as to the level of Directors' involvement in the implementation. As presently visualized, the tour would take place on a Sat- urday in May or June, 1934. It would last essentially all day the minimum bus rental is five hours) and would include several brief stops and one longer one for a box lunch and a walk on one of the preserves. Since it is logistically impossible to visit all the District sites in a single tour, the route will be planned to provide stops at several sites, such as Picchetti, Skyline Ranch,and Crittenden Marsh, that the tour guests are unlikely to have visited on their own, as well as one or two selected better known sites. Along the way, the buses will pass within viewing distance of most of the other preserves, with Board and/or staff members giving a running commentary throughout the day over the public address system. Invitations to the tour would be mailed to the members of the city councils, planning commissions, park and recreation M-83-139 Page Two commissions, county Supervisors, county planning commissions, and county park and recreation commissions within the District. Key staff members of the various agencies would also be invited. Board members would be asked to indicate which officials within their wards they considered top priority so that invitations could be sent to each of these people over their signatures. They would also be asked to follow- up on those invitations with phone calls or other appropriate action. Reservations for the tour would be taken on a first-come, first- served basis. The plan is to keep this initial tour small, with a bus that holds 41 passengers. A tour of this size would fit the 1983-84 Public Communications budget. It would also give the District an opportunity to try out the tour concept on a small scale with the idea of expanding the event in the future if it is successful. Staff will contact the Peninsula Open Space Trust to determine its possible interest in helping to sponsor the event. Recommendations: ,I recommend that you approve collectively and individually the proposed bus tour as described in concept, and agree to: 1. Participate in the tour itself. 2. Submit a list of high priority guests (government officials) from each ward. 3. Sign and forward individual letters of invitation to each of these people and follow up on the invitations with phone calls or other appropriate action. l R-83-45 41 AA, (Meeting 83-30 Dec. 14, 1983) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT December 6, 1983 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: Added Disability Coverage for Rangers Background: As part of a study regarding retirement status of District Rangers under the Public Employees' Retirement System, you directed staff and Gary Foss, the District's Personnel Consultant, to review disability insurance benefits for District employees, especially the members of the Ranger staff. Mr. Foss' report, dated October 20, 1983, is attached. Discussion: I strongly concur with Mr. Foss that the members of our Ranger staff are exposed to more potentially hazardous situations than other staff members because of the nature of their jobs and assigned responsibilities. Because of this possibility, I feel you need to address the specific issue of how disability insurance benefits for Rangers should be administered when the disability is caused by a second party or is the result of active participation in a rescue, and adjust the benefit accordingly. Based on Mr. Foss ' report, I am recommending you adopt a new personnel policy that would provide for full pay up to a maximum of three months, without use of accrued sick leave or vacation time for all Worker's-Compensation-covered on-the-job dis- abling injuries inflicted by a second party, either an individual (s) or an animal upon a Ranger while enforcing an ordinance. Although not mentioned in Mr. Foss ' report, I am also recommending this policy apply to disabling injuries incurred by a Ranger while actively participating in the rescue of an individual (s) . Mr. Foss concurs with this inclusion. It is difficult to calculate the potential costs to the District of such a policy since the future frequency of incidents is unknown (but expected to be small ) . Using current salary data, a single incident occuring at this time and requiring three months of coverage under this new policy would require District payments to a Ranger totalling approximately $6000. However, although the cost of such a policy must be included in your decision- making process, I do not think it should be the primary consideration. The Rangers, because of their ordinance-enforcement duties, are exposed to potential attacks from a second party which could result in disabling injuries. In addition, the potential of being exposed to hazardous conditions during a rescue is a very real possibility. The District, as an employer, must recognize these possibilities and take appropriate steps in such occurences to compensate District employees on the ranger staff. In his report, Mr. Foss discussed long term disability insurance. This type of insurance is currently an optional District benefit at the employee' s cost, and staff is reviewing long-term disability coverage and its related costs in conjunction with the review of all benefits (medical , dental and life insurance) offered District employees. i �I i Herbert A.Grench,Genera/Manager Board of Directors:Katherine Duffy,Barbara Green,Nonette G.Hanko,Richard S.Bishop,Edward G.Shelley,Harry A.Tumer,Daniel G.Wendin I R-83-45 Page two Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the following personnel policy, effective immediately: If, during the performance of assigned duties, an on-duty District Ranger sustains a Worker's-Compensation-covered on-the-job disabling injury, either 1 ) due to the actions of a second party, either a human(s) or an animal (s) while enforcing an ordinance, or 2) while actively participating in effecting a rescue, the District shall augment Worker's Compensation, long term disability, and other benefits in order to provide for full pay for the disabled Ranger up to a maximum of three months without use of the Ranger's accrued sick leave or vacation time. Where applicability of this policy necessitates administra- tive interpretation, the General Manager shall be the final deciding authority. If this new policy is adopted, it will also be included in the forthcoming Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual . �� Foss �� Associates Management Consultants � TO : Board of Directors � FROM : Gary C . Foss , Personnel Consultant SUBJECT : Disability Insurance Coverage for an prS DATE : October 20 , 1983 � � BACKGROUND � | � � During the Board ' s discussion concerning the retirement status of Rangers , the Board requested that staff and the District ' s � Personnel Consultant review disability insurance benefits for | District employees , especially Rangers . The impetus for the / � review was the need to determine if the insurance coverage under Worker ' s Compensation provides adequate benefits should employees , especially Rangers , become seriously or permanently injured on | the job .^ � � � SUMMARY � The issue is reasonably straightforward . The benefits of Worker ' s � Compensation coverage are differentiated between a general employee � � and safety status employee . The following is an overview of the � � basic coverage for both groups of employees who are injured on the job : � General Employee Designation T—currently all regular District employees ) � - All medical bills paid . � - Temporary disability income for duration of temporary disability ; equals approximately 65% of pay; however , this cannot exceed � � $196 per week . - Temporary Disability payment of 65% of an employee ' s salary is made up by use of sick leave until exhausted in order to provide | � the employee With 700% of their salary . - If disability is rated , then a permanent rating is assigned and paid per month until | � paid Off. Example : loss of a finger may result in a permanent rating of $3 ,000 which would be paid out per month until paid off. | | 1O35 Russell Avenue/Los Altos, CAA4022/ 41G)9G5-83Q2 \ � Board of Directors � � October 20 " 1983 � ' Page Two � ! - If the disability is permanent and the employee � | cannot return to their position * they will re- ceive : ( l ) a permanent disability settlement , and ( 2 ) rehabilitation assistance . - If the disability is permanent then e permanent rating is made which is paid off over a period � | of time . - Temporary Disability payments are tax deduutable . � � Safety Employees � � D3D is so classified) - All of the above mentioned coverages apply to the safety employee ; however , a Safety employee is guaranteed one full year of temporary disa- bility at full pay without use of their sick leave . Long Term Disability T—currently offered at employee ' s cost) � - The principal benefit of Long Term Disability is � the protection of income up to a maximum of | 86 2/3% of a monthly salary which cannot exceed � $1 , 333 per month . This protection is primarily � for off-the-job illness and injuries . - Any payments under a Long Term Disability plan are � � reduced by payments from other benefit programs , | specificaly, Worker ' s Compensation or Public Employee Retirement System payments for permanent disability � retirement benefits . CONCLUSION Worker ' s Compensation provides a sound protection plan for all employees who are injured on the 'Vb . Most public jurisdictions allow general employees to supplement the compensation payment with sick leave in order to receive full pay until their sick leave is exhausted . This is true of District employees . In recognition of the on-the-job hazards to safety officers and the fact that many injuries to safety officers require long re- covery time , safety officers lobbied for and acquired the benefit � of one full year of salary without having to use sick leave . This � is a significant advantage over general employees . Therefore , the � Rangers , as I see it, are found in the middle of the general and � safety officer benefit programs . The Rangers are exposed to more � hazards than general employees ; however they are not exposed to the frequency and extant of potential hazards as those normally attributed to local policemen and firemen . I realize that this Foss ^ ~~~.~c~~~e~ � � � Board of Directors October 20 , 1983 Page Three latter statement is highly judgemental but , according to the best technical definition of the job duties available , coupled with a solid knowledge of local police and fire work , I believe this is a proper overview . RECOMMENDATION i In recognition of the variation in the Ranger ' s work status , as an alternative , the Board may want to consider adopting a personnel policy which provides for full pay up to a maximum of three months , without deduction of sick leave , for all Worker ' s Compensation accepted on-the-job disabling injuries sustained by a Ranger . This means that Worker' s Compensation would pay 65% of the Ranger salary and the District would pay up to approximately 35% of the salary for a period of not more than up to three months . The District would only pay this amount for three months in recognition of the Rangers higher exposure to possible on-the-job accidents . The Board could refine the definition of on-the-job accidents eligible for this payment as , "those accidents caused by a third party" , i . e . a Ranger who is physically ,assaulted by a citizen when breaking up an after hours party on District property . The third party issue speaks directly to the type of injuries that a Ranger may be exposed to in " field oriented" work versus office work . I will be happy to discuss this matter with the Board in Executive Session shoo] d th_eBoard so direct . GCF :ms Foss & Associates R-83-49 Ajr (Meeting 83-30 December 14 , 1983) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT December 8 , 1983 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: C. Britton, Land Acquisition Manager; W. Tannenbaum, Real Property Representative SUBJECT: Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve - Purchase of Leasehold Interest and Interim Lease Agreement Introduction: On December 7 , 1983 you tentatively approved the Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve Use and Management Plan (see report R-83-48, dated November 28 , 1983) . As stated in that report, the former Ranch Manager has advised us that he will be vacating the premises as of April 30 , 1984 and sublease out the A-frame house. He has further requested that he be permitted to continue to rent the main ranch house until that date. With notice of his intention to sublease, the District now has the opportu- nity to exercise the "buy-out" option to acquire the former Ranch Manager ' s remaining leasehold interest in the A-frame house. Both the interim lease agreement and purchase of his leasehold interest are explained in the ensuing discussion. Discussion: On February 1, 1982 , the District entered into a Residential Lease Agreement with the former Ranch Manager to become effective on Janu- ary 1, 1984. The lease provided for his relocation from the main ranch house to the A-frame house at a nominal rent charge (this was part of the over-all agreement for the purchase of Skyline Ranch) . The agreement further stipulated that should he elect not to relocate to the A-frame, but to sublease it instead, the District would have the option of acquiring his remaining leasehold interest. According to the buy-out formula, the current amount for purchase of the former Ranch Manager' s remaining leasehold interest is $30 ,577 . If the District held this lease and an average monthly rent of $1100 was earned over the remaining term of 37 months , then at a discount rate of 10 percent, the present value of the future income stream would be approximately $34,577. This result would appear to justify the buy-out option; however, considering the additional hidden costs of vacancies and management time, there would be only a nominal, financial advantage to the District. There are substantial, intangible advantages to acquiring this remaining leasehold interest. These include increased control over the Skyline Ranch premises , direct selection and supervision of tenants and the elimination of other interface problems associated with an in-holding (especially during a period when the District is embarking on a comprehensive use plan for the Preserve) . R-83-49 Page Two The attached agreement provides for the acquisition of the leasehold interest, and it contains an interim lease agreement for the ranch house with the former Ranch Manager. As explained in the December 7 , 1983 Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve Use and Management Plan, he has expressed his wish to remain in the ranch house for four months past the expiration of his current lease term. As an "in-lieu" rent payment he will be performing certain project work for the District, and will be leaving to the District a number of needed appliances (see Exhibit B to the agreement) . With the rainy season approaching and in light of the fact that the District would benefit from the work to be done by the former Ranch Manager, his knowledge of the area, and a continued presence on the premises, it is felt that this requested "hold-over" is of substantial benefit to the District. Ordinarily you would not be involved in approving a short-term lease, but in this case it is part of a leasehold purchase package. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Open Space District Authorizing Acceptance of the Purchase of Leasehold Interest and Interim Lease Agreement and Authorizing the President or Appropriate Officers to Execute the Agreement on Behalf of the District (Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve) . I further recommend that you authorize expenditure of $30,577 from the New Lands Commitment budget category for purchase of this leasehold interest. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF THE PURCHASE OF LEASEHOLD INTEREST AND IP.TERIM LEASE AGREE- MENT AND AUTHORIZING THE PRESIDENT OR APPRO- PRIATE OFFICERS TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE DISTRICT (SKYLINE RIDGE OPEN SPACE PRESERVE) The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does resolve as follows: Section One. The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does hereby accept and approve that certain Agreement to Purchase Leasehold Interest and Interim .Lease Agreement between Sylvin Emerson, a married man, and the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference made a part thereof, and authorize the President or appropriate officers to execute the Agreement on behalf of the District. Section Two. The General Manager of the District shall cause to be given appropriate notice of acceptance to the Lessee. The General Manager further is authorized to execute any and all other documents necessary or appropriate to the closing of the transaction. �Zt RIkO►lk 11i1 tl �1011111"kI Illl ! 1141, �l 111�111►"'t1111;111111l1111t�1ii !!!! 11111 : � a� lot elf 14 r ) A-Frame l` House w� U � l•�--� i Ranch Manager's House •�, �� /� N � `�; \ .... ril— Is ¢\ �� ��-��-.ram.-...- 1.., �\ -"� �• �' T\ .�� �. 1. ,,:J �d;"'=a•,. \` .� �'�: �� �� '� m� 0 �! ''� ,,,�Ind �r��, ♦� r � L J� t \ �/ � .\l`� \n. Site Map (USGS) �,,,•, 1,II-. .,�� \�1�� ` r 1 �(, N 02177 SKYLINE RIDGE �600 l ii} OPEN SPACE PRESERVE �•,�� — — — Access Roads ��',� • �'�J, ;�1 ',i�co� �. I 1"pr, � '�. ors �.`�,...:..< Scale 1"=­'0001 North a i� :1; i ♦ ��1 � a i �>rrttiritil�[ i[if PURCHASE OF LEASEHOLD INTEREST AND INTERIM LEASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1983 , by and between the MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, a public district, hereinafter referred to as "LESSOR" and SYLVIN EMERSON, a married man, hereinafter called "LESSEE. " W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the parties have heretofore entered into that certain Residential Lease dated January 29 , 1982 , (hereafter "Lease") as attached hereto and labeled Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 10 of said Lease, should LESSEE desire to assign or sublet his interest in the Lease, the LESSOR, at its option shall have the right to buy-out LESSEE'S interest in the Lease for a lump-sum payment amount, and WHEREAS, LESSEE has expressed his intention to sublet his interest in the Lease as of January 1, 1984 , and has thereby triggered the right of LESSOR to buy-out his interest in accordance with the provisions of said Lease, and WHEREAS, LESSOR does hereby elect to exercise its buy-out option pursuant to the terms of Paragraph 10 of said Lease, and WHEREAS, LESSEE has requested to remain in the residence commonly known as the Ranch Manager ' s House during the period of January 1, 1984 through April 30 , 1984 , and LESSOR hereby agrees and consents to the interim lease thereof subject to the terms and con- ditions hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows : 1. MANNER OF LUMP-SUM PAYMENT TO LESSEE The total lump-sum payment shall be Thirty Thousand Five Hundred Seventy-Seven and No/100 Dollars ($30,577 .00) payable in cash as follows : A) Twenty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred Seventy-Seven and No/100 Dollars ($27 ,577 . 00) shall be paid to LESSEE on or before January 3 , 1984 . B) Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000 .00) shall be paid to LESSEE upon vacation of the premises referred to in Paragraph 3 herein, following inspection of vacated premises by LESSOR. 2. PREVIOUS AGREEMENTS LESSEE understands that the amounts to be paid by LESSOR in accordance with Paragraph 1 herein are payment in full for all of LESSEE'S right title and interest in and to the premises as described in the Residential Lease attached hereto as Exhibit A, and that this Agreement supersedes all previous written agreements between LESSOR and LESSEE which will, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, have no further cause or effect whatsoever. Purchase of Leasehold Interest and Interim Lease Agreement Page Two 3. LEASE OF PREMISES LESSOR hereby leases the premises commonly known as the Ranch Manager's House, adjacent garage and surrounding grounds and two-bays of the main equip- ment garage to LESSEE, and LESSEE hereby hires said premises from LESSOR, for the term and upon the conditions set forth herein. The premises are a portion of certain real property generally known as the former Skyline Ranch which is made a portion of District 's Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. 4. TERM The term of this lease shall be for four months commencing on January 1, 1984 and terminating on April 30 , 1984. 5. RENT The rent for the interim lease of said premises shall be Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3000. 00) for the entire term hereof. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 17 herein, and in lieu of cash payment of rent, LESSEE. shall: 1) perform project work for LESSOR and 2) upon vacation of the premises, on or before April 30 , 1984 , LESSEE shall leave to LESSOR certain of LESSEE'S personal property. The project work and personal property referred to in this Paragraph are more particularly described in Exhibit B as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; LESSEE understands and agrees that the "in-lieu" payment of rent as stipulated herein is applicable only to the lease period hereof running from January 1, 1984 through April 30 , 1984 and that said in-lieu payment is not to exceed the total of rent of $3000 . 00 for any reason whatsoever. 6. USE The premises shall be used as a personal residence and for no other purpose. LESSEE shall not do or permit anything to be done in or about the premises nor bring nor keep anything herein which will in any way cause a cancellation of any insurance policy covering the premises or any part thereof, or any of its contents. LESSEE shall not commit or suffer to be committed any nuisance or waste in or upon the premises, and LESSEE specifically agrees not to cause or permit any cutting of live or dead trees, grading of soil, or hunting of animals in the immediate vicinity of the premises or on LESSOR'S surrounding property. LESSEE shall not use the premises or permit anything to be done in or about the premises which will in any way conflict with any law, statute, ordinance, code or governmental rule or regulation now in force or which may hereafter be promulgated. 7. UTILITIES LESSEE shall be responsible for obtaining and paying for any and all services and utilities supplied to the premises, including but not limited to water, gas , electricity, garbage removal and telephone service. Purchase of Leasehold Interest and Interim Lease Agreement Page Three 8. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR LESSEE accepts the premises in "as is" condition. Except as otherwise provided below, LESSEE shall, at LESSEE'S expense, maintain the premises and every part thereof, and the personal property, and the yards and grounds surrounding the premises, in good, safe and sanitary condition, order and repair, shall not allow trash or waste to accumulate, and shall return the premises and the personal property to LESSOR upon ter- mination of this Lease in as good a condition as existed at the commencement of the Lease term, reasonable wear and tear and damage due to causes beyond the reasonable control of LESSEE excepted. 9. INSURANCE it LESSOR shall cover the premises with fire and extended coverage insurance protection, but shall not be liable for LESSEE'S fixtures, furnishings, and personal property stored or maintained on the premises , and LESSEE waives the right to claim damages from LESSOR for any damages resulting to said property in the event damaged or destroyed by fire or any other cause. 10. ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS LESSEE shall not make or suffer to be made any altera- tions, additions or improvements to or of the premises or any part thereof, without the prior written consent of LESSOR. 11. LIENS LESSEE shall keep the premises free from any liens arising out of any work performed, materials furnished or obligations incurred by LESSEE. 12. INDEMNIFICATION Each party shall hold the other party harmless from and defend the other party from and against any and all claims of liability for any damage to property or injury or death to any person when such damage, injury or death shall be caused by the act, neglect, or fault of the other party, or by the other party' s agents, employees, or invitees. LESSEE agrees to indemnify LESSOR against and hold LESSOR exempt and harmless from any damage to property or injury or death to any person arising from the failure of LESSEE to keep the premises in good condition and repair. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING LESSEE shall not assign this Lease or sublet the premises or any interest therein. 14. ENTRY BY LANDLORD LESSOR shall, at any and all reasonable times and on reasonable notice, have the right to enter the premises to inspect the same, to post notices of non-responsibility, and to repair the premises. Purchase of Leasehold Interest and Interim Lease Agreement Page Four 15. ACCESS ROAD Ingress to and egress from the premises by LESSEE and LESSEE'S family, agents, employees, and invitees shall be by use of the Skyline access road. LESSOR shall have no obligation to maintain said access road. 16. DEFAULT BY LESSEE The occurrence of any breach of the following shall constitute a material default and breach of this Lease by LESSEE: i) The failure to pay "in lieu" rent; as stipulated in Paragraph 3 herein; or ii) The abandonment of the premises by LESSEE; or iii) A failure by LESSEE to observe and perform any material provision of this Lease to be observed or performed by LESSEE. 17. SECURITY DEPOSIT The Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3 ,000 . 00) por- tion of the lump-sum payment referred to in Paragraph l.B) shall be retained by LESSOR as a guarantee for faithful performance of the terms and conditions of this Agree- ment. Provided LESSEE adheres to the terms herein, said it secury deposit shall be paid in accordance with said - V Paragraph 18. NO RELOCATION RIGHTS Upon expiration or sooner termination of the term of this Lease, LESSEE shall vacate the premises and remove all persons and their personal property therefrom and surrender possession of the premises to LESSOR. LESSEE hereby specifically waives any rights to, and releases LESSOR from any and all claims for, relocation benefits and/or relocation payments to which LESSEE might other- wise be entitled pursuant to California Civil Code Section 7260 et seq. , and any similar or successor statutes. 19. ATTORNEYS' FEES If an action shall be instituted to enforce this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reason- able attorneys ' fees as fixed by the Court. 20. GENERAL A) This Lease contains all of the terms, covenants, and conditions agreed to by LESSOR and LESSEE and may not be modified orally or in any manner other than by in writing signed by both of the parties to this Lease or their respective successors in interest. B) Each term and each provision of this Lease performed by LESSEE shall be construed to be both a covenant and a condition. C) If any term, covenant, condition, or provision of this Lease is held by a court of competent jurisdic- tion to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated thereby. Purchase of Leasehold Interest and Interim Lease Agreement Page Five D) The covenants and conditions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and bind the successors and assigns of the parties. 21. NOTICES All notices , demands, requests, or consents given here- under by either party to the other, shall be made in writing and shall be deemed sufficiently given and served upon the other party five (5) days after the mailing date if sent by first class mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed to the other party as follows: LESSOR: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 375 Distel Circle, Suite D-1 Los Altos, California 94022 Attn: L. Craig Britton LESSEE: Sylvin Emerson Route 2 Post Office Box 321 La Honda, California 94020 or to such other address as either party may have fur- nished to the other as a place for the service of notice. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LESSOR and LESSEE have executed this Lease to be effective as of the day and year first above written with a Lease term to commence as stated in Paragraph 4 . LESSOR: LESSEE: MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, a public district President, Board of Directors Sylvin Emerson Date Cindy Emerson ATTEST: Date District Clerk 8201.22 RESIDENTIAL LEASE THIS LEASE is made and entered into as of this 1st day of February, 1982, by and between MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, a public district (hereinafter called "Lessor") , and SYLVAN EMERSON, an individual (hereinafter called "Lessee" ) . RECITALS A. Concurrently with the execution of this Lease, Lessor shall acquire fee title to that certain real property which includes the residence, surrounding grounds, the driveway and parking area commonly known as "the large A-frame house" as more particularly outlined on Exhibit A attached hereto ("the premises") together with those appliances and other personal property listed in Exhibit B attached hereto (the "personal property") . The premises are a portion of certain real property located in an unincorporated area of the County of San Mateo, State of California, generally known as the Skyline Ranch. B. In conjunction with Lessor's acquisition of the premises, and in partial consideration thereof, Lessor desires to lease the premises to Lessee, and Lessee wishes to hire the premises from Lessor , upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. Lease of Premises . Lessor hereby leases the premises to Lessee, and Lessee hereby hires the premises from Lessor , for the term and upon the conditions set forth herein. Lessee shall also be entitled to use the personal property during the term of this Lease, subject to the provisions hereinbelow set forth. 2. Term and Rent. The term Of this Lease shall commence on January 1, 1984, and shall expire on the sooner of EXHIBIT- A Page of Residential Lease Midpeninsula Open Space District/Emerson February 1, 1982, Page 2 (i) February 1 , 1987 ; or (ii) the death of Sylvan Emerson, unless sooner terminated .in accordance with the provisions hereof . This Lease is intended to be rent-free; however , in consideration of Lessor ' s agreement to provide fire and public liability insurance coverage as stated in Paragraph 6, Lessee agrees , in lieu of reimbursing Lessor therefor , to pay rent of $300.00 per year . Should Lessee hold-over and fail to vacate the premises upon the expiration or termination of this Lease in violation of the terms hereof , it is agreed that such month-to-month tenancy shall be for a monthly rental of $2, 000 . 3. Use. The premises shall be used as a personal residence and for no other purpose. Lessee shall not do or permit anything to be done in or about the premises nor bring nor keep anything therein which will in any way* cause a cancellation of any insurance policy covering the premises or any part thereof, or any of its conents. Lessee shall not commit or suffer to be committed any nuisance or waste in or upon the premises, and Lessee specifically agrees not to cause or permit any cutting of live or dead trees, grading of soil, or hunting of , animals in the immediate vicinity of the premises or on Lessor 's surrounding property. Lessee shall not use the premises or permit anything to be done in or about the premises which will in any conflict with any law, statute , ordinance , code or governmental rule or regulation now in force or which may hereafter be promulgated. 4. Utilities. Lessee shall be responsible for obtaining and paying for any and all services and utilities supplied to the premises , including but not limited to water , gas , electricity, garbage removal and telephone service. 5. Maintenance and Repair . Lessee accepts the premises in "as is" condition. Except as otherwise provided below, Lessee shall, at Lessee' s expense , maintain the premises and every part thereof , and the personal property, and the yards and grounds surrounding the premises, in good, safe and sanitary condition, order and repair , shall not allow trash or waste to accumulate, and shall return the premises and the personal property to Lessor upon termination of this Lease in as good a condition as existed at the commencement of the Lease term, reasonable wear and tear and damage due to causes beyond the reasonable control of Lessee excepted. A __mind& I of Residential Lease Midpeninsula open Space District/Emerson February 1, 1982, Page 3 6. Insurance. (a) Lessor .shall at its sole cost and expense obtain and maintain in force during the entire term of this Lease a policy of standard fire and extended coverage insurance, with vandalism and malicious mischief endorsements, covering the premises and insuring the same to the extent of at least eighty percent (80%) of the actual replacement value thereof. The insurance policy shall be issued in the name of Lessor, with Lessee named as an additional insured. The insurance policy shall provide that any insurance proceeds payable thereunder shall be paid to Lessor. Such insurance policy shall provide that the insurance company waives all right of recovery by way of subrogation against Lessee in connection with any damage covered by such policy. Lessor shall be entitled to satisfy its obligations pursuant to this Paragraph 6 by including the premises within the coverage of any "blanket" policy covering property including the premises, provided the other requirements of this Paragraph 6 are satisfied. Lessee shall be responsible for obtaining and paying for any insurance he desires with respect to his personal property. (b) Lessor shall at its sole cost and expense obtain and maintain during the entire term of this Lease public liability and property damage insurance covering the premises with a single combined liability limit of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) and property damage limits of not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) , insuring against all liability of Lessor and its agents, employees , or invitees. Lessee shall be named as an additional insured. The policy shall contain a cross-liability endorsement, and the insurance carrier shall waive the right of subrogation against Lessee. 7. Additions, Alterations and Improvements. Lessee shall not make or suffer to be made any alterations, additions or improvements to or of the premises or any part thereof, without the prior written consent of Lessor . 8. Liens. Lessee shall keep the premises free from any liens arising out of any work performed, materials furnished or obligations incurred by Lessee. 9. Indemnification. Each party shall hold the other party harmless from and defend the other party from and against EX14191T A .713' 'Je 3 of C C Residential Lease midpeninsula Open Space District/Emerson February 1, 1982, Page 4 any and all claims of liability for any damage to property or injury or death to any person when such damage, injury or death shall be caused by the act, neglect, or fault of the other party, or by the other patty's agents, employees, or invitees. Lessee agrees to indemnify Lessor against and hold Lessor exempt and harmless from any damage to property or injury or death to any person arising from the failure of Lessee to keep the premises in good condition and repair. 10. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee shall not assign this Lease or sublet the premises or any interest therein without the prior written consent of Lessor , which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Additionally, should Lessee desire to assign or sublet his interest in this Lease, Lessor shall, at its option, be eligible to exercise either of the following: (i) a right of first refusal upon the same terms as are proposed in said assignment or sublet; or (ii) the right to acquire Lessee's remaining interest under this Lease for a lump sum amount equal to $800 (adjusted for increase in C.P.I. to date of such exercise) times the number of months remaining in the Lease term. 11. 'Damage I orDestruction. (a) In the event the residence on the premises shall be damaged to the extent of less than forty percent (40%) of the then actual replacement value thereof from any cause insured against under the policy of insurance required to be maintained by Lessor pursuant to Paragraph 6 (a) hereof or if so damaged to the extent of less than ten percent (10%) of such replacement value from causes not so insured against, then Lessor shall, as soon as reasonably possible after Lessee notifies Lessor of said damage, repair the same and restore the premises to substantially the same condition as existed immediately prior to such damage. (b) In the event the residence on the premises shall be damaged or destroyed to the extent of forty percent (40%). or more of the then actual replacement value thereof from any cause whatsoever , or in the event the residence on the premises shall be damaged to the extent of ten percent (10%) or more of the then actual replacement value thereof from any cause not insured against under the policy of in required to be maintained by Lessor pursuant to Paragraph 6 (a) hereof, then Lessor shall be entitled either: EXHIBIT Page Residential Lease Midpeninsula Open Space District/Emerson February 1, 1982, Page 5 i (i) to repair and restore the same, at Lessor 's sole cost, as soon as reasonably possible after Lessee notifies Lessor of such damage or destruction, to substantially the same condition as existed immediately prior to such damage or destruction; or (ii) to terminate this Lease by written notice to .Lessee delivered within thirty (30) days after Lessee notifies Lessor of such damage or destruction accompanied by the payment to Lessee of an amount equal to that determined in accordance with Paragraph 10 multiplied by the number of months remaining in the term hereof, after which neither party shall have any further liability or obligation to the other hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, said above multiplier shall be reduced by $200 per month in the case of damage due to uninsured causes where Lessor chooses not to repair the residence for the indefinite future. a (c) In the event Lessor shall elect to or shall be required to repair or restore the premises pursuant to this Paragraph 11, Lessee shall not be entitled to any damages or other compensation from Lessor from any loss of quiet enjoyment or for any other reason arising from Lessor ' s repair or restoration activities. 12. Entry by Landlord. Lessor shall, at any and all reasonable times and on reasonable notice, have the right to enter the premises to inspect the same, to post notices of non-responsibility, and to repair the premises , and during the last six (6) months of the term of the Lease to exhibit the premises to prospective tenants. i 13. Access Road. Ingress to and egress from the premises by Lessee and Lessee ' s family, agents , employees, and invitees shall be by use of the Skyline access road. Lessor shall have no obligation to maintain said access road. 14. Default by Lessee. (a) The occurrence of any breach of the following shall constitute a material default and breach of this Lease by Lessee: EXHIBIT A Page ©f Residential Lease Midpeninsula Open Space District/Emerson February 1, 1982, Page 6 (i) The failure to pay rent; or (ii) The abandonment of the premises by Lessee; or (iii) A failure by Lessee to observe and perform any material provision of this Lease to be observed or performed by Lessee. (b) In the event of any such default by Lessee, then in additon to any other remedies available hereunder to Lessor or at law or in equity, this Lease and all rights of Lessee hereunder shall be terminated upon delivery by Lessor of notice of such termination to Lessee. Upon such termination, Lessor may recover from Lessee all amounts necessary to compensate Lessor for all the detriment proximately caused by Lessee's failure to perform Lessee's obligations under this Lease or which in the ordinary course of things would be likely to result therefrom. Lessor shall also have the right, upon termination of this Lease, to reenter the premises and remove all persons and property from the premises. Such property may be removed and stored in a public warehouse or elsewhere at the cost of and for the account of Lessee. (c) In addition to the remedies provided above, in the event Lessee shall fail to perform any obligation to be performed by Lessee under this Lease, or shall fail to pay any sum required to be paid by Lessee under this Lease, Lessor may, but shall not be obligated to, perform or pay the same or cause the same to be performed or paid, and Lessee shall promptly upon demand by Lessor therefor , reimburse to Lessor all costs reasonably incurred by Lessor in connection therewith, together with interest on such sums at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum from the date. incurred by Lessor until repaid in full by Lessee together with said interest thereon. 15. No Relocation Rights. Upon expiration or sooner termination of the term of this Lease, Lessee shall vacate the premises and remove all persons and their personal property therefrom and surrender possession of the premises to Lessor . Lessee hereby specifically waives any rights to, and releases Lessor from any and all claims for , relocation benefits and/or relocation payments to which Lessee might otherwise be entitled pursuant to California Civil Code Section 7260 et seg. , and any similar or successor statutes. Page _�of q„� Residential Lease Midpeninsula Open Space District/Emerson February 1, 1982, Page 7 16. Notices. All notices, demands , requests, or consents given hereunder by either party to the other , shall be made in writing and shall be deemed sufficiently given and served upon the other party five (5) days after the mailing date if sent by first class mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed to the other party as follows: Lessor: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 375 Distel Circle, Suite D-1 Los Altos, California 94022 Attn: L. Craig Britton Lessee: Sylvan Emerson Route 2 Post Office Box 320 La Honda, California 94020 or to such other address as either party may have furnished to the other as a place for the service of notice. 17. Waiver. Waiver by Lessor of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition herein contained shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition herein contained. 18. Attorneys' Fees. If an action shall be instituted to enforce this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees as fixed by the Court. 19. General. (a) This Lease contains all of the terms, covenants, and conditions agreed to by Lessor and Lessee and it may not be modified orally or in any manner other than by a writing signed by both of the parties to this Lease or their respective successors in interest. (b) Each term and each provision of this Lease performed by Lessee shall be construed to be both a covenant and a condition. (c) If any term, covenant , condition, or provision of this Lease is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force EXHIBIT - A page —+ of a Residential Lease Midpenirsula Open Space District/Emerson February 1, 1982, Page 8 and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired , or invalidated thereby. (d) The covenants and conditions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and bind the successors and assigns of the parties. (e) The paragraph headings of this Lease are for convenience only and are not a part of this Lease and do not in any way limit or amplify the terms and provisions of this Lease. (f) If Lessor sells or transfers all or any portion of the premises during the term of this Lease, then Lessor , upon consummation of such sale or transfer , shall be released from any liability thereafter accruing under this Lease for the obligations of Lessor hereunder , provided Lessor 's successor in interest has assumed in writing , for the benefit of Lessee, the obligations of Lessor hereunder . (g) This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. (h) Time of the essence as to each and all of the provisions of this Lease. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have executed this Lease to be effective as of the day and year first above written with a Lease term to commence as stated in Paragraph 2. LESSOR: MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, a public district By President , Board of Directors dated: Attest: District Clerk LESSEE: J i SYLVAN EMERSON 0806H/0040h EXHIBIT,„ . Page of a. _ r _ .rs■`■ ea.'.rr`a r'a.,. ■ e ►acr_ a�,.a�r a: aar-aeriar aaa e r rr�r • .�e�rr�■ •ar�r� a�rrrr■ar■eaa a ► r t e a i e •� a a�•`r. a•a a■r r`�a. a r r r a e r a a a`iat�r r_at r a rtic s1 ■,r 3 a {ra {�srl�`aZ 1 rat r w r'ti'�••afirr s/1 r R r ■'lrairras rtisar"aa�alrla�raitar-` ^V., r !, r" •` .`\.\� t` '�?Opl� .�ri J���.^.,'�`^://`/fir. +`L/I• a.1{'d,.-�d•�'�Oh�: -�. Y.3-�. C rel Hill ,_ .n.�.=c``�w=�` _ \�7 _I IS a rJ,^ r �1.'� '`1 �-. r_.`.�. % i..}•-r� %% 'Sa ; t1 .ti mdePof—J F•'�:: /� .f .� r�` J \ �'`71; 'SIC / •�r. . _� �' ( 1� _4 `� :li�,/ .� ���a- ',� - ft�=�yi-r' _.�j. � � / r�,i.' ice. �'��` , ` "'� \ , �-"�' f_.— � �.� .� \'\_ r• �_� , ii, r-.,� _ l t ,1 �(=''J.�"�w— •- --� �;1 � ;R•�'`� �,ai�)j�i�,�1 ��"'�"�-, �'. •r.i'�'��: ^`✓ r ) _ _ `I ,A-Frame );, ; a•;r r :�_1 ,� -,� 1 T� `_=p.(. • �~ •.� 7 c� 23 "O,, �.{:, i ,; �Iv"�-j'�,a s, • \'1(� .t��;lf I � -^ v4 '+:_'�,.; .' (�--./i/"'a`` ` • `:�,_ � i`,- �. -j'��"Y1f ��r✓ (�,,p�_ ,�l_il`CN`^_ �a 34��•. o �� 7 r - `��` �� :=.1`=\; `;\� `;�!��� ■ ;;.-�•. -��_��/ ; 1 i aid.l ��s � „ �. •�• �C�q ! ` �- � 1� ! ,r""^•,� ;,• •i .� �ti �i• _ �� =:< > ■✓' t ll'� �: ,1.� �1�•-:1 `/1 r•e I// _ p r � �.. -1`� ,t�p�{l r }�� � ��� `-� f \. /� �f..^1� -f0� --\ , � lj� ;, .iil �;,. �, ."�,✓ : Irtih„�" � �, .`ti;l t./rl �•. �~ ,��,� `. _74- Mt '�^v^,vet ..� r)y��( {•_/� ���,���//� )��r`' � �j� ���i�` ""_ll ✓ f !C� ���� • r199 ' rr , VZ1 If SITE MAP (USGS) �. SKYLINE RIDGE OPEN SPACE PRESERVE ` A-Frame House (approx. 1 acre) t Cu - ar38F r j� -�1 -- - - Access Road u Scale 1" = 2000 ' NA .. �-�\\ i �•-iQs"JJa.:�J1- \. _ � \�G� ��1�l r!.-. _ L✓�.—\ 1 - rL -rri-:_. �-'r{u r. EXHIBIT Page q a. "IN LIEU OF RENT" -- PAYMENT SCHEDULE I. LESSEE' S PERSONAL PROPERTY AND APPLIANCES Ownership to Pass to District Upon Vacation of Premises--on or before April 30 , 1984) A. Buck woodburning fireplace insert B. Gas range C. Refrigerator II. CLEAN UP AND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS A. Clean out garage and bays - deposit debris in debris box. * B. Clean up behind garage and surrounding area, including demolition of greenhouse and salvage of galvanized pipe and "I" beams - deposit debris in debris box. * C. Leave two wooden buildings behind garage intact, but clean out contents and debris and deposit in debris box. * D. Remove all vehicles and vehicle parts - deposit debris in debris box. * E. Assist MROSD staff with the preparation of as-built drawings of the various water, septic, and electrical systems on the property. F. Perform road repairs as requested by MROSD staff with personally owned road arader. III. GATE Keep Skyline Boulevard access gate locked at all times. IV. RATE AND FORMULA (Total Amount Not to Exceed $2 ,000. 00) Sylvin Emerson to perform 50 hours per month at $10/hour for four months on the site clean up and maintenance projects as specified above, and/or on a pro-rated basis, road grading and repair at $40/hour as requested by MROSD staff. Final Calculation: Rent 4 months @$750/month $3 ,000. 00 Less: 1. Appliances $1,000. 00 2. Project work 2 ,000. 00 $3,000.00 Total Variance 0 .00 Debris box supplied at MROSD expense. Specifically for clean up and deposit of debris identified in agreement. EXHIBIT— B Page R-83-50 (Meeting 83-30 December 14 , 1983) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT December 7 , 1983 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: C. Britton, Land Acquisition Manager; W. Tannenbaum, Real Property Representative SUBJECT: Santa Clara County Request for Telecommunication Facility Within the Federal Aviation Administration Black Mountain Site on Monte Bello Open Space Preserve Introduction: The County of Santa Clara has requested that it be per- mitted to install a telecommunications facility on Black Mountain. In accordance with the "Policies for Black Mountain Communications Facilities" adopted at your December 8 , 1982 meeting (see memorandum M-82-27 dated November 19, 1982) a public service group proposal such as this one is subject to the Board's Procedure for Reviewing Special Use Proposals if the additional facility materially increases the impact on the open space preserve, as determined by staff. While Open Space Management has deter- mined that this facility would not represent a major impact upon the Monte Bello Open Space Preserve, it is felt that the additional use as proposed herein should be subject to Board review because an additional building and an antenna mast are proposed. Discussion: Blueprints and plans have been initially approved by Open Space Management. The County facility would consist of a mast approxi- mately seventy feet above ground level with an antenna at the top of the mast. A 10 foot x 8 foot x 8 foot storage building would house the elec- trical equipment necessary to operate the facility. The small building and antenna would be located within the existing Federal Aviation Adminis- tration (FAA) telecommunications site with the FAA's formal approval. No rent would be charged either by the FAA or the District for the County site, and a separate Memorandum of Agreement will be executed by all parties upon District Board approval (see attached) . In addition, the County sublease would be subject to all the terms and conditions which are currently in effect between the District and FAA, including specific terms the District has included to protect the open space characteristics of the area. Use: Santa Clara County currently provides a variety of link-up services for various public agencies in the area, including the District. The addition of the Black Mountain facility to the County communications R-83-50 Page Two network would provide an expanded link-up network for use solely by public agency safety units including fire, police, and District Ranger staff. The site is especially critical to the County as it would allow for radio communications among mobile units which cannot be reached from the present radio sites. Conclusion: Open Space Management staff reports that the County radio facility as proposed would not have a major impactupon the Preserve. To ameliorate intrusion into the area the County will be required to paint as much of the facility as possible matt manor brown and to plant land- scape screening. Not only will this site substantially enhance the all- important communication capabilities among County-wide emergency and public safety units, but permission for this special use will be in keeping with the spirit of reciprocity which exists between Santa Clara County and the District. Recommendation: I recommend that you adopt the accompanying Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Approving the Ground Communications Sublease Between the Federal Aviation Administration and the County of Santa Clara (Monte Bello Open Space Pre- serve Black Mountain) RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT APPROVING THE GROUND COMMUNICATIONS SUBLEASE BETWEEN THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AND THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (MONTE BELLO OPEN SPACE PRESERVE - BLACK MOUNTAIN) The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does resolve as follows : Section One. The District may, under the provisions of Section 5540 and 5563 of the Public Resources Code, lease property owned by the District for a period of up to twenty-five (25) years, and the Board of Directors reaffirms that the premises to be leased for Communication Facilities are temporarily unnecessary for park and open space purposes and considers that a sublease of such pre- miser for Communication Facilities is in the public interest, on the terms hereinafter set forth. Section Two. The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does hereby approve the Sublease between the Federal Aviation Administration (as Master Tenant) and the County of Santa Clara (as Sublessee) as memorialized in the Memorandum of Agreement, a copy of which Memorandum is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof, and does hereby autho- rize the President and appropriate officers to execute said Memo- randum on behalf of the District. Section Three. The General Manager of the District shall cause to be given appropriate notice of acceptance to Master Tenant and Sublessee. The General Manager further is authorized to execute any and all other documents necessary or appropriate to the closing of the transaction. . J . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION P.O. BOX 92007, WORLD WAY POSTAL CENTER LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90009 AWP-84R-420 RCAG Mountain View, CA MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 198,,, by and between the Federal Aviation Admini- stration, 'hereinafter called the FAA, and the County of Santa Clara, of hereinafter called the COUNTY, with the approval and acceptance f the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, hereinafter called the DISTRICT; W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, under Lease DTFA08-83L-10374 dated August 10, 1983 with the DISTRICT, the FAA occupies 0.59 acres of land in Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 3 West, MDB&M, in the County of Santa Clara, for a communications facility (RCAG), and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has requested permission to install and maintain an emergency communications facility at the FAA's RCAG site. NOW, THEREFORE, the FAA does hereby grant unto the COUNTY permission to. construct and maintain said facility within the FAA fenced area, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. All conditions and obligations placed on the FAA by Lease DTFA08-83L-10374 with the DISTRICT, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"' and made a part hereof, shall apply to the COUNTY in its use of the FAA's RCAG site. 2. The COUNTY'S facility shall be designed, located and installed according to drawings approved by the FAA and the DISTRICT prior to commencement of any initial installation or future relocation work. 3. The COUNTY'S operations covered by this agreement shall be so conducted that interference is not caused to radio-electronic equipment operated by the FAA. If the COUNTY'S operations cause interference to the operations of the FAA, it will promptly take such corrective measures needed to eliminate or modify to an acceptable degree the interference problem. •' Page 2 4. Any resultant electronic or physical interference by the COUNTY'S equipment with the FAA operations shall be corrected at no cost to the FAA. 5. This agreement is granted on the understanding that the COUNTY will operate its facility with the frequencies and equipment listed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Any change in frequencies or equipment shall be coordinated with the FAA for approval prior to implementation. 6. For the purpose of access to the RCAG site, the COUNTY shall install a lock in series on the FAA gate and shall insure that the gate is locked at all times. Regular commercial power may be obtained through existing power service, provided a separate meter is installed. Standby power will not be made available from the FAA's engine generator. 7. The FAA shall not be responsible for damage to property or injury of persons which may arise from or be incident to the use of the property herein authorized to be used, nor for damages to property nor injuries to the COUNTY'S officers, agents, employees or others while on the site, and the COUNTY shall hold the FAA harmless from any and all such claims, provided however, nothing in this agreement shall be construed as waiving or replacing any right or claim which would otherwise be properly exercised under the Federal Tort Claims Act, as amended, arising from negligence in the use of the premises by officers, agents and employees of the FAA and not from the negligence of COUNTY officers, agents and employees. 8. No member of Congress or Resident Commissioner shall be admitted to any share of this agreement or to any benefit to arise therefrom. Nothing, however, herein contained shall be construed to extend to any incorporated company, if the agreement be for the general benefit of such corporation or company or individual. 9. The COUNTY warrants no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicite or secure this agreement upon an agreement for a commission, percentage or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the COUNTY for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, the FAA shall have the right to annul this agreement with- out liability. 10. The rights granted under this agreement are not assignable. 11. The FAA shall provide the above rights, privileges and services to the COUNTY at no cost. The FAA reserves the right, however, to require the COUNTY to share a pro-rata amount of road maintenance costs in the event major road work is undertaken by the FAA. Advance notice will be given if this option is to be exercised. III i Page 3 12. This agreement shall remain in force and effect from the date hereof until terminated by either party after 60 days' notice in writing to the other party. This agreement shall also cancel and supercede Memorandum of Agreement DTFA08-82L-10396 dated March 18, 1983, by and between the FAA and the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have subscribed their names hereunder as of the date first written above. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION By ELIZABETH M. ROLLINS Title Contracting Officer COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA By Title MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Recommended For Approval: Approved And Accepted: By Title �r 488 Westridge Drive Portola Valley, California 94025 10 December 1983 Judge V. Gene McDonald San Mateo County Superior Court Redwood City, California 94065 Dear Honorable Judge McDonald: Until now I have withheld commenting on the status of the Hassler Health Home. An item appearing today as a result of your decision in the Peninsula Times Tribune stimulates me to write you. It is erroneous and misleading of Ms. Waters to camouflage her purposes with the statement "Snldings on the register are protected from demolition." Such a careless statement is detrimental to the worthwhile concept of the National Register of Historic Places . That was never intended to be its purpose. Being on the national inventory does not stop a building's demolition. The buildings were consider in a 1973 county-wide survey and were denied inclusion by authorities knowledgable in architecture and history. It is extremely doubtful that . the Hassler Health Home could qualify for the Register. It does not meet the age criteria. If it indeed ever had historic integrity, much was lost as soon as the buildings were vacated. I puzzle what Area of Significance Ms. Waters considers that the buildings could qualify. It would seem she is attempting to present a Federal program without knowing its background. Her statement pressure is unadulterated "smoke screen." If you feel the`F'possibility of it being considered on the National Register"I suggest you discuss the program and the buildings with the California State Historic Preservation e ervation Officer or the man in charge of such nominations, Aaron Gallup. They serve under the State Parks & Recreation Department. Their phone is 916-322-8598. Thank yo u u for your consideration. Sincerely, ll Dorothy Regnery (Mrs. David C. ) 83 488 Westridge Drive Portola Valley, California 94025 10 December 1983 Judge V. Gene McDonald San Mateo County Superior Court Redwood City, California 94065 Dear Honorable Judge McDonald: Until now I have withheld commenting on the status of the Hassler Health Home. An item appearing today as a result of your decision in the Peninsula Times Tribune stimulates me to write you. It is erroneous and misleading of Ms. Waters to camouflage her purposes with the statement "B11dings on the register are protected from demolition." Such a careless statement is detrimental to the worthwhile concept of the National Register of Historic Places. That was never intended to be its purpose. Being on the national inventory does not stop a building's demolition. The buildings were consider in a 1973 county-wide survey and were denied inclusion by authorities knowledgable in architecture and history. It is extremely doubtful that ' the Hassler Health Home could qualify for the Register. It does not meet the age criteria. If it indeed ever had historic integrity, much was lost as soon as the buildings were vacated. I puzzle what Area of Significance Ms. Waters considers that the buildings could qualify. It would seem she is attempting to present a Federal program without knowing its background. Her statement pressure is unadulterated "smoke screen." If you feel they possibility of it being considered on the National Register'AI suggest you discuss the program and the buildings with the California State Historic Preservation Officer or the man in charge of such nominations, Aaron Gallup. They serve under the State Parks & Recreation Department. Their phone is 916-322-8598. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �Z L) Dorothy Regnery (Mrs. David C. ) a . WA 2.;IDPII`TLNSUTA REGIaV\L OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ' TO. Board of Direct ors rs �FROM: H. trench General Manager SUBJECT: F .Y.I . DATED: 12/14/83 a c I i 94 POR peri insu la Conservation Center Foundation 2253 Park Boulevard December c e m b e r 6 1983 Palo Alto, California 94306 s Telephone (415) 328-5313 Dear Member , The question is what to do with all our garbage . Five northern Santa Clara County cities will soon exhaust their dump facilities . Sunnyvale may close its dump in 1986 . Palo Alto must close its in the 1990s . The Stierlin Road landfill , serving Los Altos , Los Altos Hills and Cupertino , will remain open after 1987 only if Mountain View allows it to expand . The five cities generate 387 , 000 tons of solid waste a year . They separate 10 , 000 tons of recyclable paper , glass and metal . By 1990 , we may recycle 20% of our solid waste , and by the end of the century 35% . However , the amount of waste is growing , so that in twenty years , we will still have roughly the same amount of refuse to dispose of in landfills . The north county Solid Waste Management Authority, after examining more than 40 possible landfill and waste processing sites , recommends the five cities use Bryan Canyon , on lands owned by Kaiser Cement Corp- oration on the edge of Cupertino , as a landfill . The Authority believes the canyon can serve as a disposal site for more than 100 years with "very small " technical , financial and environmental risks . There are no homes in the canyon , and only a few residents to the southeast have views into it . Consultants who have helped site 200 landfills in the U . S . and Canada believe it poses little risk of groundwater contamination . Bryan Canyon ' s proximity to the five cities makes it far less expensive than other landfills in the county . Kirby Canyon , in the foot- hills east of San Jose , is 26 miles from Sunnyvale . Pacheco Pass , a landfill serving Gilroy , is 45 miles away . Trucking north county garbage to those dumps would consume energy , increase highway traffic and add to our air pollution problems . Both sites have other drawbacks . Environ- mentalists oppose use of Kirby Canyon as a landfill because it is habitat for the endangered Bay checkerspot butterfly and the Mount Hamilton thistle . And San Jose , which has first claim to Kirby Canyon , might bar participation by north county cities in order to reserve future disposal capacity for itself . The Pacheco site is crossed by the active Calaveras fault and its current capacity would be exhausted in a few years at the rate north county cities generate refuse . The Bryan Canyon proposal included plans for both recycling and incineration . Refuse collected by the towns would be taken to transfer facilities ( probably in Palo Alto and Sunnyvale ) where recyclables would be separated and most of the remaining waste shredded to reduce volume , then hauled to the landfill on trucks designed for highway travel . The plans to burn waste to produce electricity at the landfill have been tabled because of concerns about air pollution and doubts about the technology of incineration . ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY THROUGH EDUCATION AND DIRECT ACTION .Page 2 December 6 , 1983 Bryan Canyon can now be reached only through the Kaiser Cement Plant . Cupertino has declared that it will approve the project only if a new access road is built to the canyon from Highway 280 . Currently, trucks going to and from Kaiser make as many as 1500 trips a day on residential streets , and Cupertino wants those , and the approximately 100 waste hauling trucks that would go to Bryan Canyon , to bypass its neighborhoods . But the authority ' s own Citizens Advisory Committee opposes the access road , in part because they feel the additional 100 trucks would not be a considerable burden on Cupertino , and in part because they fear the new road would precipitate development of open space now owned by the Catholic Diocese of San Jose . There are bound to be environmental consequences to the proposal . Local residents question the lack of alternative landfill sites , the safety of the ground water and the effects of an access road . It is hard for conservationists to support a dump proposal anywhere . But we feel there is much to warrant our support of the Bryan Canyon proposal . Public officials have complained to us frequently in recent months that while they consistently hear from developers at their public hearings , they no longer hear from environmentalists . If environmental - ists do notparticipate in the decision about what to do with the garbage , environmental considerations will be lost in the final outcome . The proposal must be approved by the Authority, the five city councils and the County ' s Intergovernmental Council . Hearings will be held by all of them . A hearing for Los Altos residents is scheduled before the Los Altos CityCouncil on December 13 . An area wide hearing 9 will be held by the Authority on January 12 , 7 : 30 p .m . at Fremont High School in Sunnyvale . We will post the times and locations of other hearings at the Peninsula Conservation Center . If you wish to know more or to write letters or attend hearings , we invite you to call Nancy Olson at PCC , 415-328-5313 . Additional information is available at PCC , libraries located in the five cities , and at the Solid Waste Management Authority office in Sunnyvale . We urge you to take an interest in this issue , to become more informed and to attend hearings and speak with community leaders . Yours truly, 7,?t& She""" & ' Peter Steinhart President , PCCF Board of Directors Nancy- Olson PCCF Librarian MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTAND- DEC 8 1983 Between the EVERGREEN RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT and MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Santa Clara County, California This Memorandum of Understanding is between the Evergreen Resource Conservation District, County of Santa Clara , hereinafter called the District and the Midpeninsula Open Space District, hereinafter called the Open Space District. The Open Space District and the District both have responsibilities for protecting and - developing natural resources within their respective boundaries. Recognizing the need for a close working relationship in carrying out the responsibilities for which each is charged, the Open Space District and the District hereby enter into this Memorandum of Understanding as a foundation for an enduring cooperative working relationship. Such cooperation will allow joint effort- in solving problems relating to the conservation, protection, and development of such natural resources. WHAT THE DISTRICT WILL DO The District will make technical assistance available as requested by the Open Space District. This assistance asset forth below will be provided by the District as well as by Federal, State, and local agencies which work through the District within the limitations of their budget, availability of personnel and in accordance with established policies for reimbursement of certain costs. THE DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE SERVICES TO: 1. Assist in conducting inventories of natural resources. 2. Provide and interpret soil surveys, identify land use limitations and make land use recommendations . 3. Counsel with Planning personnel on natural resource matters which relate to the long-range development of the Open Space District. 4. Assist the Open Space District personnel with natural resource planning. 5. Analyze water disposal, erosion and sediment problems , and wildlife habitat problems and recommend remedial measures. 6. Provide guidance on natural resource problems that may develop. 7. Provide design criteria for conservation project measures. 8. Review survey data, and check adequacy of designs of soil and water conservation measures. 9. Make recommendations on installation of measures to conserve and utilize natural resources. WHAT THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICT WILL DO -2- THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICT GOVERNING BODY WILL: 1. Observe principles of sound soil and water conservation giving consideration to the need for adequate drainage facilities , erosion control measures , stabilization of sediment producing areas , woodland and wildlife management, proper effluent disposal, and aesthetic improvement. 2. Encourage consultation with the Board of Directors of the District in the development of long range plans for the Open Space District. Use the information and services made available by the District in preparing plans. 3. Refer the planning personnel to the District for assistance in natural resource planning. 4. Refer development projects to the District for review and technical opinion concerning the effect that the proposed projects may have on land use , the soil and water problems, and wildlife habitat: problems L-hat may develop, and the measures that may be needed to alleviate them. 5. Be responsible for the adoption of those recommendations made by the District which are acceptable to the governing body and in compliance with local ordinances. 6 . Furnish field surveys, proposed layouts , designs, or other data needed to adequately check proposed developments. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD 1. Standards and specifications developed by the District resource agencies will be used in the planning and application of conservation practices. 2. Technical data and other materials needed to give competent consultive services will be mutually agreed upon by the Open Space District Manager , the District Conservationist, and other_ resource specialists . This Memorandum shall become effective when authorized and signed at an official meeting of each party. It may be modified by mutual agreement and may be terminated by either party upon written notice. EVERGREEN RESQURCE CONSEERRVATION DISTRICT By - /ys���� Title Date �G • MIDP INSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT By— Title- President, Board of Directors Date October 26 , 1983 ALM MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 375 DISTEL CIRCLE,SUITE D-1,LOS ALTOS,CALIFORNIA 94022 (415)965-4717 I 1 November 18, 1983 Mr. Raloh Heim California Advocates, Inc. 925 L Street, Suite 380 4 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear R.aloh. Thank you for attending our recent Board meeting! As a follow- up to that, would you please submit an updated Legislative Report focusing on your efforts in our behalf on those n and B priority items in our most recently updated Legislative Proaram (attached) . If an item is not worth pursuing further (Roberti-Z 'bera $90,000 "Loss?) , let us know in the report, and we can drop it. Best rewards, r Herbert Grench General Manager HG•jc Attach. %.:,;e-,cn.Generpi tanager Board of Directors:Katherine Duty.Barbara Green,Nonette G.Hanko.Richard S.Bishop,Eo.a+d G Sh+elley.!ta,y A%,r:w.C< net G vi endin ', r s C' -i_ms 83-23 l itig 83-30 %eV4eE 14, 1983 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT C L A I M S r Amount Name Description 115861 $ 50.00 Association of Environmental District Dues Professionals 5862 9.03 Barron Park Supply Co. Plumbing Supplies II5863 74.23 Bullard Safety West Ranges Uniform Accessories 5864 900.00 California Advocates, Inc. Legislative Consultant Fee-Nov. '5865 93. 80 Clark' s Auto Parts, Inc. District Vehicle Maintenance 5866 213.00 Communications Research Co. Radio Maintenance Service 867 7.02 Crest Copies Blue Lines 5868 46.03 H.S. Crocker, Inc. Office Supplies 5869 160.00 Jim Drivers Road Repairs-Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve 870 108. 96 The Frog Pond Meal Conferences 5871 25.40., Mary .qundcrt;:. Private Vehicle Expense 5872 9.95 Harbinger Communications Computer Services-Mailing List 5873 500.00 Suzanne Hennacy Refrigerator for Rental Unit 5874 338.40 Hipp Welding, Inc. Sign Brackets 875 25.43 Hubbard and Johnson Shop Supplies 5876 35.00 Steve Hurst Private Vehicle Expense $877 142.98 Image Technology, Inc. Map Mylars 5878 565.64 Lawrence Tire Service, Inc. Tires for District Vehicles 5879 13. 31 Los Altos Stationers File Folders 880 26.56 Minton's Lumber & Supply Shop and Hardware Supplies 5881 87. 79 Mobil Oil Co. Gas for District Vehicles 5882 62.88 Noble Ford Tractor, Inc. Supplies for Tractor i883 84. 70 Stanley Norton October Expenses-Phone,Copying, Meal Conferences 884 124.01 Norney' s Miscellaneous Office Supplies i885 5.01 City of Palo Alto Utilities y886 1, 109.51 Peninsula Oil Co. Gas for District Vehicles 887 109.45 Peninsula Times Tribune Printing of ` Financial Statement and Legal Ads i888 25.41 Rancho Hardware & Garden Shop Miscellaneous Shop Supplies �'I Claims 83-23 Revised Meeting 83-30 Amount Name _ Dece , ,JN3 I 5889 $ 91.85 San Francisco Water Department Water Service-Hassler 15890 314.28 Shell Oil Co. Gas and. Repair for District Vehicles 5891 363.60 Signs of the Times Signs-Los Trancos and Monte Bello' Open Space Preserves 5892 69.19 William Tannenbaum Office Equipment 5893 78.64 Uno Graphics Brochures-Windy Hill Open Space Preserve 5894 154.00 Valley Title Co. Preliminary Title Report ' 5895 33.66 Alice Watt Private Vehicle Expense 5896 338. 36 Xerox Maintenance Agreement and Usage Charge ' 5897 400.00 Foss and Associates Personnel Consulting Fees-Nov. 15898 3,000.00 Clevenger Realty Appraisal Co. Appraisal Consultant 5$99 27399.$8 Susan Cretekos Patrol Services-Windmill Pasture 5900 24,694.99 Sylvin Emerson Purchase of Leasehold Interest- Partial Payment 5901 48,000.00 First American Title Land Acquisition-Mariscal Guaranty Co, Property 5902 41.42 ZZZ Sanitation Co, _ Portable -Toilets-Hassler 5903 371.69 Hawkins-Hawkins Co. , Inc. Metal Signs 5904 297.20 Hertz Equipment Rental Tractor Rental 505 159. 75 Langley Hill Quarry Road Repairs I5906 115.50 Los Altos Garbage Co. Dumpster Service-Ranger Office 5907 12,500.00 Robert MacDougall, Jr. Appraisal Services 5908 4,000.00 Metro Real Estate Research Appraisal Services 5909 356.08 On-Line Business Svstems , Inc. Computer Services-Oct, 5910 328.53 PG and E Utilities 5911 121.00 Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Equipment Installation and Permit- Bean House 5912 1,049. 74 Pacific Telephone Telephone Service 5913 6.00 Rancho Cobbler & Cleaner Ranger Uniform Repair 5914 70.00 Recreation and Park Conference Registration Fee-H, Grench 5915 221.94 SGS , Inc. Repair Work-Skyline Blvd. Rental Unit 5916 579,11 Scotts Valley Sprinkler & Pipe Field and Shop Supplies Supply 'S917 8.99 , Sears , Roebuck and Co. Repair Saw ' 5918 47. 71 Union Oil Co. Gas for District Vehicle 5919 208. 39 Rich Voss Trucking, Inc. Sand,Base Rock and Trucking Charge Claims 83-23 � Revised eting 83-30 cember 14, 1983 Amount Name Description L5- 920 $ 89. 78 West Coast Shoe, Co. Uniform Boots 921 32.00 Del Moods Private Vehicle Expense "922 557.82 Herbert Grench NRPA Computer Workshop , -Meal Conference and Benefit Payment � 923 30.95 Suzanne Shipley Computer Course 924 5 ,000.00 James C. Morrit ,Bob Whalen, and Balance of Purchase Price-Depew Terry Depew Acquisition 925 5,625.00 Rogers, Vizzard and Tallett Professional Legal. Services-Oct. 926 265. 72 Petty Cash Office Supplies ,Meal Conferences, Maps ,SubscriDtions ,Film Development,Meeting Room` Rental for 12-7 Meeting, and Private Vehicle Expenses.