HomeMy Public PortalAboutCity Council_Minutes_1969-10-07_Regular 1969COUNCIL MINUTES
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
OCTOBER 7, 1969 .
INITIATION:
1 Mayor Harker called the regular meeting of the City Council to
order at 7:35 p.m.
2 The invocation was given by Elder Arlen Harris, Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter Day Saints, 6249 Kauffman Avenue.
3. Mayor Harker led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Councilmen: Beckley, Briggs, Merritt, Harker
ABSENT: Councilmen: Tyrell
ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Koski, Assistant City Manager Recupero
City Attorney Martin, Director of Public Works
Pizzorno, Planning Director Dragicevich
For the record it was noted that Councilman Tyrell had advised he
would be present later in the meeting. He arrived during the first
order of business.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Councilman Merritt moved to approve the minutes of the Regular
Meeting of September 16, 1969, as printed, seconded by Councilman
Briggs and carried.
Councilman Briggs moved to approve the minutes of the Adjourned
Meeting of September 25, 1969, as printed, seconded by Councilman
Merritt and carried.
Councilman Beckley advised that while he had been absent from these
meetings, he had read both sets of minutes carefully and had
acquainted himself with the matters covered so that he was qualified
to consider the matters continued to tonight's meeting.
6. PUBLIC HEARING (continued) 7:30 p.m. Re. Appeal, Conditional Use
Permit No. 69 -291PC - 9503 E. Las Tunas Drive (Sam's Roast Beef)
Mayor Harker declared that the continued public hearing on the
matter of appeal for conditional use permit at 9503 Las Tunas Drive
was now open.
City Manager Koski advised that at the Public Hearing on September 2,
1969, Council had referred this matter back to the Planning Commission
for clarification of reasons for denial, and that the new findings of
the Planning Commission were outlined in Resolution No. 69- 351PC.
Planning Director Dragicevich outlined the reasons for the denial
as follows: 1) the site was inadequate in size to accommodate the
applicant's plan, 2) the property relates to traffic in a hazardous
manner for the proposed use, and 3) the surrounding property would
be adversely affected by noise, location of restrooms and other factors.
Mayor Harker invited those present who wished to speak -for or against
the matter to come forward.
Rex Dalrymple, representing Denny's Restaurants, advised that they
did not feel the traffic flow was great enough in the area to con-
sider it a hazard, and that Denny's was willing to screen the rest -
rooms from the street in an acceptable manner; and considered that
the construction of the facility would improve the community and
eliminate an eye sore.
Council Minutes, October 7, 1969 Page 2
Al Nunamaker, 5757 Agnes, advised that in additior. to the items
covered at the previous meeting, he wished to state that a group
of downtown businessmen had met to study improvements of the down-
town area, and that this development as proposed would stop the
growth of the City.
No one else came forward to speak on the matter.
Councilman Briggs moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by
Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried.
Councilman Merritt advised that he considered the placement of
the restrooms as incidental, but that other points provided by the
Planning Commission were valid.
Councilman Beckley stated that the analys, is. provided by the Planning
Commission had been well thought_out,and moved to support Resolution
No. 69 -351PC denying the appeal, and to instruct the City Attorney
to prepare a resolution so denying. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Merritt. Councilman Tyrell advised that he was abstaining
from voting on the motion inasmuch as he had been absent for a portion
of the hearing. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen- Beckley, Briggs, Harker
NOES: Councilmen- Merritt
ABSTAINING: Councilmen - Tyrell
7 PUBLIC HEARING (continued) 7:30 p.m. Re. Formation of Consolidated
Citywide Lighting District
Mayor Harker advised that the matter of formation of a proposed
citywide lighting district had been carried over because only three
counci -lmen had been present at the Public Hearing on September 25,
1969, however that minutes and background material had been made
available in order that all councilmen be eligible to vote. Council-
men Beckley and Tyrell affirmed that they were familiar with the
testimony and prepared to vote
City Manager Koski advised that the matter before the Council was
the determination as to whether or not the City would form a consol-
idated citywide lighting district, and withdraw from four county
lighting districts.
'Mayor Harker advised that the hearing on the matter of a consolidated
citywide lighting district was now open, and invited those present
who wished to speak for or against the matter to come forward.
No one wished to speak.
Councilman Briggs moved to close, seconded by Councilman Beckley,
and unanimously carried.
City Attorney Martin presented the following resolutions for con-
sideration by the Council:
Resolution No. 69 -955 entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE IMPROVE-
MENT DESCRIBED IN RESOLUTION No. 69 -944 TO BE MADE, AS DESCRIBED
IN THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND PLAN REFERRED TO THEREIN, PROVIDING
FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF ALL EXISTING LIGHTING DISTRICTS IN
TEMPLE CITY INTO A SINGLE DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE "STREET
LIGHTING ACT OF 1 919 ", ORDERING THE WORK AND LEVYING THE
ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN AND ILLUMINATE BY
ELECTRIC ENERGY THE STREET LIGHTS WITHIN THE SAID DISTRICT,
Resolution No. 69 -956 entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY WITHDRAWING CERTAIN TERRITORY FROM
THE ROSEMEAD LIGHTING DISTRICT,
Council Minutes, October 7, 1969 - Page 3
Resolution No. 69 -957 entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF TH_E_-..0 I TY QF . TEL4PI F - -.0 LTY , COUNTY OF LOS— ANGELES, , STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, WITHDRAWING THAT PORTION OF COUNTY LIGHTING MAIN-
TENANCE DISTRICT Noe 540 WHICH IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL
LIMITS OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY,
Resolution No. 69 -958 entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, WITHDRAWING THAT PORTION OF COUNTY LIGHTING MAIN-
TENANCE DISTRICT No. 1395 WHICH IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL
LIMITS OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY,
Resolution No. 69 -959 entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY WITHDRAWING CERTAIN TERRITORY FROM
THE LONGDEN LIGHTING DISTRICT, and
Resolution No. 69 -960 entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF TI-FE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DETERMINING THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE
CONTRACTOR CAPABLE OF SERVING THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM WITHIN
TEMPLE CITY MUNICIPAL LIGHTING DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ENGINEERING PLAN, AND ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT TO BE CARRIED
OUT BY SUCH CONTRACTOR.
Councilman Merritt moved to adopt Resolutions 69 -955, 69 -956, 69 -957,
69 -958, 69 -959 and 69 -960, naming the district as Temple City
Municipal Lighting District. Councilman Beckley seconded the motion
which carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen- Beckley, Briggs, Merritt, Tyrell, Harker
NOES: Councilmen -None
ABSTAINING: Councilmen -None
8. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:30 p.m. Re. Request for Franchise - Southern
California Water Company
City Manager Koski advised that for several years the Southern
California Water Company had provided satisfactory service within
the City of Temple City, even though no franchise was in effect,
however that a franchise would outline the responsibilities of
both parties and would provide protection to both the City and
the Southern California Water Company. He advised that the pro-
posed 15 -year franchise had been reviewed in detail by the City
Attorney, and that proper notices relative to the hearing had been
made. .A map showing the area served by the Southern California
Water Compariy was presented as an exhibit.
Mayor Harker invited those who wished to speak for or against the
matter to come forward. No one wished to speak.
Councilman Merritt moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by
Councilman Briggs.
A report from the Director of Public Works concerning negotiating
the means by which fire hydrants would be installed, which was
concurred in by the Fire Department, was reviewed. Councilman
Briggs inquired as to long range plans for installation of water
mains, and was advised that no times have been set, that it is
covered by a general plan only.
Councilman Tyrell moved that the franchise be granted, seconded by
Councilman Briggs and carried. City Attorney Martin presented
Ordinance.No. 69 -294 entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING TO SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE
TO USE OR TO LAY AND USE PIPES, DITCHES, FLUMES, CONDUITS AND
APPURTENANCES, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING WATER FOR ANY AND
ALL PURPOSES, IN, ALONG, ACROSS, UPON AND UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS,
WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES AS THEY NOW EXIST OR MAY HEREAFTER EXIST
WITHIN A DESIGNATED FRANCHISE AREA OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY,
Council Minutes, October 7, 1969 - Page 4
providing for a 15 -year franchise, for first reading. Councilman
Tyrell moved to waive further reading, seconded by Councilman
Briggs and carried unanimously.
9. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:30 p.rn. Re. Complaint - Jack -in- the -Box Operations,
9202 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City
Mayor Harker stated that now was the time for a public hearing
relative to complaint on Jack -in- the —Box Drive -In, which hearing
was now open.
City Manager Koski reported that at a previous meeting, several
residents had petitioned the Council to consider the matter of
nuisance caused by patrons of the Jack -in- the -Box Drive -In on Las
Tunas Drive at Encinita. He advised that notices of Public Hearing
had been sent to those concerned, and that the Sheriff's Depart-
ment had been asked to keep surveillance on the facility on a
daily basis.
Assistant City Manager Recupero advised that in May of this year
a previous complaint had been received from one resident relative
to a new owner whose hours of operation exceeded those established
by the City for the previous owner, creating noise disturbing to
the resident, but that the matter had been brought to the attention
of the operator who then adjusted the hours of operation to the
satisfaction of the complainant. Report from the Sheriff's
Department of incidents at the location from May 1 to September 1,
1969, was received, as well as a report for the month of September.
Mayor Harker invited those present who wished to speak in support
of the complaint to come forward.
Paul Helm, 5825 Encinita, presented a report of incidents that had
been observed by him and his wife, however he advised that he had
not been able to obtain license numbers of cars leaving the location.
He stated that there had been a general improvement of about 1/2 since
petition to Council on September 2, 1969, however that operating hours
that had been established were not being strictly observed,
Joy Galt, 5834 Encinita, presented a report of incidents on which
some license numbers were noted. She stated that some of the patrons
of Jack -in- the -Box leave without turning their lights on, and speed .
out of the drive, creating a nuisance and a hazard.
No one else came forward to speak in support of the complaint.
Mayor Harker invited those present who wished to speak in behalf
of Jack -in- the -Box to come forward.
Edmund LeBer, Jr., Food Makers, Inc., advised that he had had several
conferences with the City Manager and Assistant City Manager, and
had attempted to take care of the complaints that had been received,
however that the complaints this evening were somewhat different, and
asked to receive copies of the Sheriff's reports and those filed
by the previous speakers in order to examine them. It was noted
that license number reported on Mrs. Galt's report was that of an
employee at the Drive -In.
Councilman Tyrell asked Mr. LeBer if he would agree to chain the
lot during the hours it was not in operation, to keep unauthorized
persons from using the lot in the manner which was disturbing to
the residents. Mr. LeBer agreed that this could be done.
Councilman Tyrell moved that the Public Hearing be continued to
November 4, 1969, at 7:30 p.m., in order to allow the franchisee
time to install chains, and to see that they are chained at closing
hours, and that copies of the report be made available to those con-
cerned, seconded by Councilman Merritt and unanimously carried. The
Sheriff's Department was asked to furnish information as a continuing
report on the location.
Council Minutes, October 7, 1969 - Page 5
10. NATTER TOOL & MFG. CO. - Complaint re. Noise
City Manager Koski advised that a meeting had been held on
October 6, 1969, with representatives of the Natter Mfg. Co.,
and that a report of the meeting and summary of action by the
staff to date, had been prepared for review by the Council. The
following improvements were noted: 1) that Natter Tool had in-
stalled a heavy soundproofing material on all sides of the punch
press, which has a positive effect in minimizing noise, 2) that
decibel readings taken at 4515 Cloverly now provided a reading of
46, in contrast to a former reading of 90, 3) residents at 9425 Gidley
and 4527 Cloverly have indicated vibration and noise level considerably
improved, and 4) resident at 4515 Cloverly considers noise at a
minimum when doors are kept closed at the plant, and the condition
was now satisfactory. Other conditions were noted for which corr-
ections were in progress, including installation of Barry spring
mounts on each leg of the punch press machine as soon as they are
received, and special grease for reduction of gear noise. Comments
from the City Attorney, incorporated in the report, advised that the
City Attorney would represent the City and not the property owners
as requested by Mr. Riley at a previous meeting; and that Municipal
Code Section 9421 was not applicable from the standpoint of deter-
mining whether a public nuisance exists. The report was reviewed
at length by the Council, and copies of the report furnished to
those concerned for information prior to discussion.
Mrs. Rose Spolach, 4904 Kauffman, addressed the Council relative
to vibrations occurring at her residence, and whether they may
be caused by the Natter manufacturing operation. Inasmuch as
Mrs. Spolach reported the vibrations occurring during early morning
hours and on weekends when the Natter Company was closed, some
other source was suspected.
Following inquiry from Mr. Tyrell relative to decibel readings,
Frank Hutton, 4515 Cloverly, advised that to obtain accurate
readings certain additional equipment would be necessary, however
the readings he had taken provided information for the purpose of
comparison. Council discussed various zoning requirements re.
noise that could be established and which were in effect in other
cities, however no conclusions were reached.
Stan Christiansen, Vice President and General Manager, Natter
Manufacturing Co., advised that the report submitted by staff to
Council, covering the meeting with representatives of the Natter
Manufacturing Company, was very thorough. He noted the improve-
ments that were being experienced by the residents, and advised
that they would continue to cooperate as indicated to eliminate noise.
Dorman Charter, 9503 Gidley, administrator of the estate of Locke,
advised that the property he represents was devalued because he
could not establish other activities on the property zoned M -1,
while across the street the Natter Manufacturing Company can
carry on manufacturing operations in M -2.
Planning Director Dragicevich reviewed the history of zoning for
the subject area.
Paul Fowler, 4515 N. Fiesta, discussed the concern of M -1 properties
being extended further into the City. He called attention to a
present federal law whereby factories doing government work were
required to meet certain standards. Mr. Christiansen advised that
all federal standards were presently met.
Councilman Briggs noted that the .committee protesting the noise had
not made the effort to hold a.. meeting, thereby indicating that the
matter was no longer as serious as it had been previously, and that
it appeared there would be continued improvement, so that the situation
was not now as critical as it was previously. He moved to continue
the matter to November 4, 1969, to allow time for the installation of
Council Minutes, October 7, 1969 - Page 6
the spring mounts, during which time staff could continue to keep
surveillance on the situation. The motion was seconded by Council-
man Merritt and carried, Councilman Tyrell abstaining.
Agenda items 13 through 16, which were acted upon while persons concerned
with Item 10 read a report, are recorded in numerical sequence.
11. ORDINANCE No. 69 -293: 1st reading (rev.): Re. Household Pets
City Attorney Martin advised that, as required by law, this ordinance
was referred back to the Planning Commission for consideration
because of revisions, and that the findings of the Planning Commission
are as follows: 1) that standards as adopted be approved by the
Council, 2) that item 17 of the criteria of standards for structures
housing birds be included in the ordinance, and 3) 40' requirement
be reduced to 35' from a residence. He advised that inclusion of the
revisions would return the ordinance to first reading.
The following correspondence was received:
1) Harold E. Jackson, 5827 Alessandro, advocating no dogs allowed,
2) Estelle Meek, 5956 Primrose, requesting rigid enforcement, and
3) Robert K. Wallan, 9479 Daines Drive, requesting that existing
buildings constructed under county codes be allowed to remain at
their present locations if 40' requirement is established.
Planning Director Dragicevich advised that the Planning Commission Also
recommended modification of item (b) (2) of Sections 2, 3 and 4, to
exclude crowing roosters. He stated that the recommendati.on„of._35' from
a dwelling and 10' from the property line would conform to standards
used by the County of Los Angeles.
Councilman Merritt stated that he did not feel 35' was much improve-
ment over 40', as it still would not permit construction of an aviary
on a large number of lots. Councilman Beckley considered that the
10' requirement from the property line should be relaxed if a solid
wall or fence separated it from the adjoining property. ,
The following corrections to Ordinance No. 69 -293 were concurred in:
Item (b) (2) of Sections 2, 3 and 4 to read: "Not more than
two rabbits or chickens (excluding roosters) or ducks over three
months of age"
Section 2 (b) (3) c) to read: "that the structures housing such
aviaries shall not be located within ten feet of any side or rear
lot line upon the lot where located, unless separated from adjoin-
ing property by a solid wall or fence at least. 1" thick, nor shall..."
Item 17 of check list to be included as item e) under Section 2
(b) (3) as follows: "All existing nonconforming structures erected
for the housing of birds shall comply with new regulations and
standards on or before January 1, 1971."
City Attorney Martin presented Ordinance No. 69 -293 entitled AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY AMENDING THE TEMPLE CITY ZONING
REGULATIONS WITH REGARD TO HOUSEHOLD PETS, as amended, for first
reading. It was moved by Councilman Tyrell to waive further reading,
seconded by Mayor. Harker and unanimously carried, Councilman Merritt
reserving the right to vote "no" on final reading.
Boyce F. O'Bannon, 10316 E. Olive, filed a minority report relative to
standards developed by the Planning Commission for the housing of
birds. Mayor Harker advised that each member of the Council would be
provided with a copy of the report, for consideration, prior to the
next meeting.
12. RESOLUTION No. 69 -954: Denying Variance, ZV Case No. 69 -292PC
(John Marshall, applicant)
City Attorney Martin presented Resolution No. 69 -954 entitled A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DENYING
A VARIANCE AND CONFIRMING RESOLUTION No. 69 -344PC OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION. Councilman Merritt moved to adopt, seconded by Council-
man Briggs and unanimously carried.
Council Minutes, October 7, 1969 - Page 7
NEW BUSINESS:
13. BROADWAY, south side, between Rosemead and Loma - Sidewalk
Construction.
Director of Public Works Pizzorno advised that inasmuch as numerous
children are using the south side of Broadway going to and from
school, as well as pedestrians traveling to the commercial develop-
ment at the intersection of Broadway and Rosemead, it was recommended
that sidewalks be constructed on the south side of Broadway, between
Rosemead and Loma, as a part of the current improvement project, and
requested approval and authorization of expenditure in the amount of
$2,000, from savings derived from the Longden - Encinita project.
Councilman Merritt so moved, seconded by Councilman Tyrell and
unanimously carried.
14. PURCHASE OF TAX LIEN PROPERTIES FOR STREET PURPOSES - Acaso Drive
City Manager Koski advised that a small segment of Acaso Drive,
where it intersects with Sultana, was available for purchase at
minimum cost, to provide this additional right -of -way to the City.
Councilman Tyrell moved to approve the purchase, and to authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement with the County
Board of Supervisors, seconded by Councilman Beckley and unanimously
carried.
15. PERSONNEL APPOINTMENTS:
City Manager Koski presented Resolution No. 69 -961, A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPOINTING PERSONNEL,
for the appointment of Fred Harwell as Park Maintenance Man.
Councilman Tyrell moved to adopt, seconded by Councilman Beckley
and unanimously carried.
City Manager Koski presented Resolution No. 69 -962, A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPOINTING PERSONNEL -
TEMPORARY. Councilman Tyrell moved to adopt, seconded by Councilman
Merritt and unanimously carried.
16. WARRANTS & DEMANDS: RESOLUTION No. 69 -963
Councilman Beckley moved to adopt Resolution No. 69 -963, A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ALLOWING
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $90,199.71, DEMAND Nos. 754
THROUGH 906. Councilman Tyrell seconded the motion which carried
unanimously.
17. COMMUNICATIONS:
A. City Manager Koski presented a claim from Shaw & Shaw, Attorneys
at Law, representing Howard M. Scott, for injury sustained while
crossing Temple City Boulevard on August 5, 1969, and tripping on
the lip of the gutter. Councilman Tyrell moved to deny, and to
refer to the City's insurance carrier, seconded by Councilman
Briggs and unanimously carried.
B. City Manager Koski presented signed agreements from the following
property owners on Daines Drive for right -of -way, subject to certain
conditions which were read in their entirety:
James & Mary Phillips, 10036 Daines Drive
Donald & Linda Ebersole, 10018 Daines Drive
Russell G. & Jeannette Bailey, 10030 Daines Drive
Councilman Merritt moved that we accept the conditions and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement, seconded by Council-
man Beckley and carried by the following roll call vote:
Council Minutes, October 7, 1969 - Page 8
AYES: Councilmen - Beckley, Briggs, Merritt, Harker
NOES: Councilmen - Tyrell
ABSTAINING: Councilmen -None
Councilman Merritt moved that staff be authorized to proceed with
engineering design and to encumber the City for the work in the
amount of $11,000, as provided in cost estimate provided by the
Director of Public Works. Councilman Beckley seconded the motion
which carried by the fo llowing roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen - Beckley, Briggs, Merritt, Tyrell, Harker
NOES: Councilmen -None
ABSTAINING: Councilmen -None
18. TIME FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK:
A. Bob Sorenson, 9981 E. Bogue, stated that he did not feel the
Planning Commission should be used as a research resource in
assisting the Council on decisions, and that he was at variance
with Mr. Nunamaker's position that Sam's Roast Beef Restaurant
would stifle the growth of the City, and felt that no weight should
have been given to his arguments because he provided no proof of
what the group he was meeting with would do to assist the City.
Councilman Tyrell advised that the Planning Commission was a
fact - finding body, and that the Council has the election of either
reviewing an appeal on the basis of the record, which is what a
court does, or they can hear everyone again. Other members of the
Council discussed the various aspects of the hearing referred to.
It was also noted that opinions were always welcome, for which
proof may or may not be provided.
B. Jerry Kolb, 6403 Temple City Boulevard, expressed appreciation
for the job being completed on Temple City Boulevard. He discussed
the efforts he had put forth to assist in public relations on the
Boulevard, and was glad to see the end of construction in sight.
He suggested a street dance to provide a fitting celebration, or
perhaps the high school band to perform prior to taking down the
barriers. Mr. Kolb was commended for his efforts in behalf of his
neighbors.
C. Rudolph Hergert, 5708 Temple City Boulevard, inquired if the
Fire Department is required to use their sirens during the night-
time hours, inasmuch as they are quite disturbing to sleeping
residents. He was advised that these regulations must be carefully
adhered to, and that frequently it is rescue operations which
necessitate nighttime calls.
19. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS:
A. Councilman Merritt inquired what ventilators or protrusions
existed in the sidewalk on Temple City Boulevard inasmuch as he
had attempted to find the problem and could not locate it. Mr.
Kolb advised that the protrusions had come from the Edison Company
vaults and that they have all been corrected.
B. City Manager Koski presented a communication from the office
of the Attorney G =eneral advising that the Attorney General was
contemplating the filing of an action on behalf of the State of
California and the cities and counties of the State for damages
that may have been suffered due to smog, and urging cities to
execute a resolution authorizing the Attorney General to take
such action on behalf of the City. City Attorney Martin presented
Resolution No. 69 -964 entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY AUTHORIZING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO REPRESENT THIS CITY IN BRINGING AN ANTI-
TRUST ACTION AGAINST CERTAIN AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS. Council-
man Tyrell moved to adopt, seconded by Councilman Beckley and
unanimously carried.
1
Council Minutes, October 7, 1969 - Page 9
C. City Manager Koski presented a communication from the County
Board of Supervisors, urging support to oppose the Federal Tax
Reform Act of 1969. It was noted that previous correspondence
has been sent to members of the Senate, and House of Representatives,
and Mayor Harker advised that he would follow -up with personal
telephone calls to seek this support.
D. City Manager Koski presented a communication from T.A.S.C.
wherein the Executive Board was submitting a resolution requesting
amendments to the T.O.P.I.C.S Program, having to do with
categorizing various classes of highways.
E. Assistant City Manager Recupero advised that the new insurance
policy for the City had been received from McVey Insurance Agency,
and that the City Attorney had reviewed and approved it in its
entirety.
20. ADJOURNMENT:
Councilman Briggs moved to adjourn to a Study Session at 10:45 p.m.,
seconded by Councilman Merritt and carried. Next regular meeting
of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, October 21, 1969, at
7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 5938 North
Kauffman Avenue, Temple City.
ATTEST:
b
MAYOR