Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
Appendices Watertown Bike Ped PlanAppendices_COMBINED
Appendix A: A�� LTS Analysis Q` (9) Watertown Appendix A BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Bicycle Level of Stress Analysis Appendix A — Bicycle Level of Stress Analysis The Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress analysis prepared for the Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is based on a methodology originally developed by researchers at the Mineta Transportation Institute, and advanced by Peter Furth, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University College of Engineering.The methodology identifies typical conditions for bicycle facilities,vehicle speed, vehicle volume, on-street, parking, and transit service and applies them to street segments according to roadway classification.The data and assumptions used in the Plan are detailed below. Data Sampling The Town of Watertown's Department of Public Works (DPW) GIS based street inventory data was used to classify every street in town.The DPW classification system uses 6 classes,with each of the classes having the following title: • Class 1: Limited access highway • Class 2: Multi-lane highway, not limited access • Class 3: Other numbered route • Class 4: Major road—arterials and collectors • Class 5: Minor street or road (with road inventory information) • Class 6: Minor street or road (with minimal road inventory information—a "local" street for our purposes) Data was sampled for each of the six roadway classes identified above.The sampling defined parameters for each set of criteria,which was applied to all remaining streets in each class, including where data was not available. Streets included in the 2018 Evaluation Report for the Town-Wide Traffic Counting Program conducted by the Town of Watertown Department of Public Works were summarized first for Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and 85t" percentile speed. For streets not included in the 2018 Evaluation Report,ADT and 85tn percentile speed data was taken from the database of all available Watertown traffic counts, including automatic traffic recorder(ATR) data,turning movement counts (TMCs), and speed studies received from the Watertown Department of Community Development and Planning,the Watertown Department of Public Works, Watertown Zoning Relief Petitions, or the Town of Watertown.All available speed data was summarized.ADT data was summarized by DPW class and includes the following notes and methodologies: • Class 1-2: No available ADT data • Class 3-4: All available Class 3-4 ADT data were referenced • Class 5: At least 1-2 samples taken from every alphabet letter by street name • Class 6: All available Class 6 ADT was referenced. As mentioned above,for Classes 1, 2, 3,4, and 6, all available ADT data was referenced. A limited number of ADT data was sampled for Class 5 streets. It was at this time that we noted that the DPW classification system grouped the majority of Watertown roads into Class 5. Based on desktop and field observations it was clear that there was a large amount of variation in roadway ADT and speed within Class 5.To further classify streets in the DPW Class 5 category,federal functional classifications were referenced.According to federal functional classifications, numerous roads within the DPW Class 5 are (9) Watertown Appendix A BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Bicycle Level of Stress Analysis listed as urban minor arterials, and the remainder of the Class 5 roads are listed as local streets. Based on this comparison, roadways listed as urban minor arterials were maintained as Class 5 roadways, and the remainder of DPW Class 5 roadways were reclassified as Class 6 local streets. Based on available speed and ADT data,the following parameters listed in Table 1 were estimated for streets in each class: Table 1: ADT and 85t" Percentile Bins by DPW Class DPW ADT 85th Percentile Class (Vehicles/Day) Speed (mph) 1 n/a n/a 2 19000 37 3 15000 31 4 12000 35 5 4001 28 6 2001 25 The information outlined in Table 1 is then used to classify each street in terms of bike level of traffic stress. It should be noted that there are no Class 1 roadways in Watertown according to DPW classifications. Bus Facilities MBTA Bus routes were documented from the MBTA system wide map.'The MBTA's Winter 2020 schedule was used to document frequently of service for each route running through Watertown.2 Bus route classifications were determined as follows: • Frequent: If bus wait time is at most every 30 minutes based on available bus schedule • Infrequent: If bus wait time is at least 30 minutes based on available bus schedule The following corridors were identified with the bus facilities: • Galen St:two lines: 52, 57. 52: Every 30-40 min. 57: 10-30 min. Frequent • Watertown St: 59: Every half hour to 40 min. Infrequent • Arsenal to Main: 70: every 5-30 min. Frequent • Mt auburn: 71: every 10-20 min. Frequent • Belmont St: 73/71. 73: every 5-20 min. Frequent • Belmont St: 554: every half an hour to one hour. Infrequent • Pleasant St se: 558: one schedule for half hour interval, otherwise >one hour. Infrequent Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress Roadway Classification Methodology: Level 1: If • Separated bike lane or • Shared with vehicle traffic and (speeds< 30 mph, ADT< 2000 vehicles) 'https://cdn.mbta.com/sites/default/files/maps/2019-12-22-mbta-system-map-2020-full.pdf Z https://www.mbta.com/schedules/bus 2 (9) Watertown Appendix A BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Bicycle Level of Stress Analysis Level 2: If • Buffered bike lane and (or(speeds<35 mph,ADT< 15000 vehicles)) or • Bike lane and no parking and no bus route or • Shared with vehicle traffic and (speeds< 30 mph, 2000 vehicles<_ADT_<4000 vehicles) Level 3: If • Bike lane and (or(parking, infrequent bus) or • Shared with vehicle traffic and (or(no bus, infrequent bus), and (or(4000 vehicles<ADT< 10000 vehicles)) Level 4: If • Shared with vehicle traffic and (speeds> 30 mph, 10000<ADT< 15000) or • Shared with vehicle traffic and frequent bus or • Shared with vehicle traffic and (speeds< 30 mph, ADT>10000 vehicles) or • Shared and (speeds >35 mph, ADT< 10000 vehicles) Level 5: If • Shared and (or( speeds>35 mph,ADT> 15000 vehicles) Manual Updates The initial results of the bicycle level of traffic stress analysis were reviewed and compared to desktop and field reviews of existing conditions, as well as local knowledge of each corridor.The following manual updates were completed so that the bicycle level of traffic stress more accurately represents current conditions: • Arlington south of Mount Auburn Street: 3 to 4 based on desktop and field review • Arlington Street near intersection with Mt.Auburn Street: 3 to 5 based on desktop and field review • Arsenal Street: 4 to 5 where no separated facility based on desktop and field review • Cottage Street: 1 to 2 based on desktop and field review (high cut through route) • Greenough Boulevard: 3 to 4 due to high speeds • Kingsbury Avenue: unclassified because it is located on campus • Main Street near Watertown Square: 4 to 5 based on local review • Mount Auburn Street: 4 to 5 based on local review • Repton Circle: unclassified as not a public street • Talcott Avenue: unclassified as not a public street • Thompson Street: unclassified as not a public street • Welch Avenue: unclassified as not a public street • Wheeler Avenue: unclassified as not a public street • Wooley Avenue: unclassified as not a public street 3 fth Appendix B = I : � `��!,a " Public Feedback Summary %` fth Appendix B = I : � `��!,a " Public Feedback Summary %` Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey Public Feedback Summary Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey Prepared February 17, 2020 by McMahon Associates The following document provides a summary of key themes and comments generated from the first public meeting and the community survey developed as part of the Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan public outreach process. 1. Public Meeting #1 Summary The first public meeting for the Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan was held on Monday,January 27, 2020.The purpose of the meeting was to provide a project overview, information on existing conditions for walking and biking, and collect feedback on priorities for pedestrian and bicycle improvements, as well as gain an understanding of the public's priorities for addressing trends emerging from the planning process and for the overall vision for the plan.The meeting was attended by 62 members of the general public as well as Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee and Steering Committee members. A combination of a presentation and interactive stations were used to present educational information and collect feedback. Public feedback was collected in several ways: • Interactive boards used to collect input on specific topics, such as priority locations for bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and input on identified emerging trends and developing a vision for the plan. A full set of boards the boards presented is available in Appendix A. • Comment cards to collect additional station-specific feedback as well as general input. • The community survey available on electronic tablets. r oEdres:in the Brcycfe pnd Pedestrian Alum Vrhirstunpurrune eo xrcui�-oee ,r—M. V _ Emerging5rends y � � y wi YY J n/Vtt' Of � t Page 1 of 16 (9) Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey A summary of all of the information collected from the boards and comment cards is summarized in Figure 1,with the most repeated words appearing larger.'As seen in the image to the right, safety is a top concern among meeting participants. Other repeated concerns involve intersections, cars, sidewalks, bike parking, and enforcement.This helps demonstrate the public's priorities for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, emphasizing the need to prioritize safety for both modes, consider facilities that help pedestrians and bicyclists travel through intersections, consider the interaction between pedestrians and bicyclist with vehicular traffic, provide and maintain sidewalks, provide bike parking, and ensure that traffic laws for all modes are enforced. Figure 1:Summary of Public Comments PedestrmnBuutt"ton °iri1agnin4 """ ''' wu LKV R.,:d. rn� ca rs—OPedestrianRefugelsLand I17te5ectLol7 Maintain Plantings Continuous Repair turps Trees-..—... 4 A`:.✓ €ulture€hangs �■�^ •�n��^ ' � \ � =f InfrastructureRs Tra f fzc O , ff`�'` ``,�.�',•. - c rl� Roads �YStreets, Pulbl�c BUow.r LAWS " TrafficLights 9 Structural o :'Running r ® / e Cr uUnp di■ bty @■mrrknset a VisibUt commit B�keLone l � RrpeSe llr� PLOW b' L■aa' �" ■ YYid er Enhance x�N,Uunarrro w ekeParkng � Ra^dD,.t Space Improves■ VEnforcement, q Comforret RapLdRashi^° LeadingPedestrianlntervatNutaRaffrr■rffiik.tar■ ...�.. -Station Specific Specific Feedback Key themes and comments from the public, including information collected on boards through sticky notes and dots, comment cards, and verbal statements to the project team are summarized below by station. For the most part,where specific comments were provided, they are summarized in the manner stated in order to retain accuracy. Where more general ideas were expressed, comments are summarized and grouped to reflect the general sentiment. Station 1:Existing Conditions Participants reviewed a series of boards providing information on the project, demographics and travel trends, existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, safety information and crash data, and current projects.As there was not a specific activity at this station, all comments received were via comment cards. • Do not focus so heavily on commuters at the expense of those of us who live here, especially older or retired or semi-retired people 'Similar words with different endings were grouped together,and the words"pedestrian"and bicycle'were omitted. Page 2 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey • Complete Streets: Plant and maintain trees, high curb around tree pits, larger tree pits (or longer),wider planting strips, structural soil • Mt.Auburn Street project will cause more problems for vehicles, which are part of the users in town Station 2:Summary of Feedback Station two provided a summary of feedback on the plan from the Steering Committee and Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee, as well as a summary of recommendations from previous plans. Feedback collected is a combination of sticky notes posted on a board to collect additional feedback for what to consider in the plan, show in Figure 2, as well as comment cards. • Enforcement—involve police in bicycle and pedestrian safety, enforce vehicles running red lights, enforce that pedestrians and bicyclists follow rules • Need for covered and secure bike parking at express bus stops and new commercial construction. Require bike parking for new commercial construction. • Improve safety through traffic calming and road diets Figure 2:Station 2 Public Comment Board • Consider conflicts between bicyclists and pedestrians- Your Feedback Watertown separate bike lanes from � ""``""`_'°""""" pedestrian walkways around senior living buildings ♦ Useastickynotetotellus what feedback from pnvreffortsismostimportarttoinrorporate g g yr vdd�ess in the B We o-d Pedestrivn Awn complexes q2 IL • Maintenance of roads/bike lanes, more and continuous bike lanes > r • Improve sidewalks with granite curbs and street trees, - especially around Cunniff School and Middle School (dangerous for kids walking to school) and in business districts • Shared bus/bike lanes must be continuous to avoid confusion • Would like to know how community path can be done along Irving Street (very narrow) and beyond to link sum with western part. Why not make an opening under the bridge at Patton and Arsenal orm Page 3 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey and use the old railroad right-of-way? • Provide bike signals at major intersections • Street trees on sidewalks should not interfere with sidewalks and bike paths • Snow removal on sidewalks • Find alternate bike routes around congested areas like Coolidge Square and Arlington Street • Use caution with speed bumps • Whatever is planned should not require loss or removal of parking or travel lanes • Locations identified with safety issues: Belmont Street and Greenough Boulevard for bicyclists, pedestrian refuge island on North Beacon is not safe, Watertown Square for pedestrians Station 3:Issues and Opportunities Participants were asked to identify their top two priority locations with sticky dots on a map for pedestrian and bicycle improvements, seen in Figure 3.The locations that generated the largest number of dots are listed in Table 1. As seen in the table, Watertown Square generated the largest number of dots for both pedestrians and bicyclists. Other similar themes across both modes include conditions on Mount Auburn Street and improving connections between the roadway network and off-street paths including the Community Path, Cambridge-Watertown Greenway, and Charles River Path. Specific comments on issues at these locations provided via comment cards are summarized below Figure 3. Table 1: Locations Generating the Highest Number of Dots/Comments PRIORITY • • Pedestrian Bicycle Watertown Square Watertown Square 10 dots 6 dots Main Street from Forest Street to Watertown Mount Auburn Street Square 4 dots 5 dots Mount Auburn Street Connection between Summer Street and 5 dots Arsenal Street 4 dots Pleasant Street between Bacon Street and Walnut Street connection to Greenway Myrtle Street/access to Charles River Path and Community Path 3 dots 3 dots Arlington Street at Nichols Street/Greenway Arsenal Street at Greenough Boulevard entrance 3 dots 1 dot (+ 2 comments) Page 4 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey Figure 3: Station 3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Maps Pedestrian Issues & Opportunities Woe °'"^Ia�PA� ��. Opportunities AD 0 q — Wi { i _ . Use dot stickers to identify the top two areas you would like to see improvement T--W.d. N.—K for pedestrians.Limit 2 dots per person.If you nave an issue or opportunity not uea J las and OppM—Itiea ld,,Ifled by St ring G—ineeand Bi Pad cycle B —W.Commu— �, noted on the map,record it on an index card. Bicycle Issues & Opportunities ®Watertown e, ater EprsraiA�e�� end _ F nn Opportunities opoa, r � 1 Uset sfic4ers to identify the top two areas you would like to see improvements far�.Limit 2 dots per person.If you have an issue or opportunity not ss a aye onw❑eni+iQs wenured by 3l®win9 ca„mia.e,ac Bicycle&veaesnian cemn,inae noted on the map,record it on an index card. Page 5 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey Pedestrian Specific Comments • Improvements from Galen Street into Watertown Square • Mt.Auburn Street at Summer Street crossing and at Coolidge Square—dangerous crossings • Mt.Auburn Street—not enough crossings • Pleasant Street between Bacon Street and Myrtle Street/access to Charles River Path— crosswalks to access DCR parking lot and Howe Park • Arlington Street at Nichols Street/Greenway entrance—right turning cars cannot see pedestrians on sidewalk, narrow sidewalk with light pole, prioritize pedestrians at signal, get rid of permission right turn where path extension will be. Very dangerous for pedestrians. Push out curb so turn is less gradual. • Improvements at intersections between Ridgelawn Cemetery and Lexington Street • Spring Street at Summer Street—drivers do not yield to pedestrians, poor lighting, common school walking route • Alignment of detectable warning panels is confusing at corners with a wide radius • Bigelow Avenue at Nichols Avenue - "spoke" arrangement of sidewalks through grass curb extensions at northwest and northeast corners are confusing for seeing impaired Bicycle Specific Comments • Improvements from Galen Street into Watertown Square to improve accessibility to businesses and Charles River • Mt.Auburn Street between Bigelow and Arlington Street—not enough room for bikes • Summer Street to Arsenal Street—awkward crossing to community path • From Arlington Street at Belmont Street,Templeton Parkway to Grove Street is a good north-south bicycle connection • North Beacon Street and Greenough Boulevard—bicyclist hit by SUV Station 4:Bicycle and Pedestrian Toolboxes Station 4 provided information on eight pedestrian facilities and eight bicycle facilities.The following summarizes comments received on comment cards: • Provide bike parking o Commercial districts (require for new development) o Watertown Square • Pedestrian crossings o Improve and increase number of crosswalks along Belmont Street o RRFB between post office and library lacks audio cue for seeing impaired o Leading pedestrian intervals do not help, as drivers turn without yielding- preference for concurrent phasing o Pedestrian push buttons frustrate drivers when they are pushed, but pedestrians cross anyway when no cars are coming o Crosswalks needed with anti-skid aggregate to prevent bicyclists from slipping • Bicycle facilities Page 6 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey o Preference for double buffered bike lane, separated bike lane, and protected intersections. Separated bike lanes separate bicyclists from pedestrians. o Two stage bike box and bike signals are not helpful Station 5:Emerging Trends& Vision Participants were asked to rate the importance of key words and phrases summarizing emerging trends identified through the planning process with the Steering Committee and Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee using sticky dots, as seen in Figure 5 (next page).These ideas were then presented in the form of draft vision statements for the plan, where participants could rank how important they saw these elements for inclusion in the plan's vision. Figure 4 illustrates the emerging trends and vision elements that were rated most important, symbolized by circle size.' Overall,there was general agreement in the importance of all of the identified vision elements and emerging trends.The trends that generated the most agreement on their importance were safety and culture change, and expanding transportation choice.The ideas that generated the most agreement for their inclusion in the vision were again safety, along with providing an interconnected network, inclusive facilities, and having dedicated funding. Figure 4: Public Priorities for the Bicycle& Pedestrian Plan Vision Importance of Addressing Emerging Trends in the Bicycle&Pedestrian Plan oft a bicycle and pedestr'an t0�0���``` h��4 01*f6 Connectivity, r• �aFl.IF Fspapety Create a safe connected `Pf 011- network for everyone network for sLpportsto:�, everyone goals for climate change �O d L L I Is inclusive of Transportation Expand choices for 11 for implementation and abilities PIP— —qqq walking and biking and personnel 'Ir..P�7tsl vibrant publilw rculture Change:Work, spaces towards a more multi-1j,,,,,. modal culture Is interconnected �.motes a culture of within town and walking and biking to neighboring communities Regional Connections: Improve gateway corridors to neighboring communities 'Results were tallied by"very important", "neutral",and "not important".A neutral or not important vote was subtracted from the"very important"total to generate one number per category. Page 7 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey Figure 5:Station 5 Emerging Trends and Vision Boards Emerging Trends '"°tert°'" aq Based on what you have learned tonight,rate how important it is to you for the Bicycle and Pedest:ian Plan to address each emerging trend. 1 Use one dot sticker to vote on each tend. J The Watertcwn Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan will... -*-b. a Neutral Not Important --------Ow rronsportation Cooice:Expand choices f •• • • walking and biking •��•• • Culture Change: •••:•• • Mork towards a more multimodal culture•00VC • Safef:n �o Create a safe network for everyone • � 'on" ecn'vity: •� • • • ]evolop a connected network for everyone be • Vfbronw .:•�•. . •.�• nhance public spaces .Regional Connecdonsr Improve gateway • ••• •• corridors to neighboring communities • %•N•0 • • Did we miss one? Please use an index card to record on ennarging trend not captured hery that is impoirfant to you. Drafting a Vision �WatertownAryvgN k Help draft the vision for the Watertown Bicycle L Pedestrian Plen Using a total of 4 dot stickers,place them on the statements you think are most or least important to the vision forthe Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.You may distribute them however you would like. The Town of Watertown will support a bicycle and pedestrian network that.... �L—-4--Very Important Neutral Not Important Is interconnected within town anc to neighboring aommuniti0 - O g Is safe and accessible for all users • 0 Is inclusive of people of all ages and abilities • •: • Promotes a culture of walking anc biking ••:I.�••� • Supports vibrant public spaces 4 •• •• • 0 Supports healthy lifestyles • •• . • Supports town goals for climate change 900000600 0 Supports a multi•nodal environment • •.••• Has dedicated funding for implementation and personn•00 00 • •i Page 8 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey The identified key themes from the public feedback will be used to develop the vision and goals for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. Comments related to specific locations and facility types, as well as the need for maintenance, enforcement, policies and programs will be used to develop recommendations for the plan. Additional Overall Comments Submitted comment cards that do not pertain to a specific station are summarized below: • Plowing/Snow Removal o Town owned property in Watertown Square o Better adherence to existing business snow removal requirement o Need resident snow shoveling ordinance. Newton has one—ticketing would make it serious • Crossings o Crosswalks not painted o Traffic lights do not work o Lack of traffic lights at crosswalks • Enforcement o Enforce traffic laws. When motorists consistently run red lights no one feels safe. o Close calls with pedestrians and bicyclists from motorists running red lights, most blatantly at Watertown Square. Traffic enforcement is the first priority in pedestrian and cyclist safety. • Fix existing infrastructure- bike sensors at Myrtle and Pleasant do not work. Cyclist must trigger light by riding to pedestrian button or wait for a car to trigger the signal • As a pedestrian, highest priorities are clear sidewalks good repair, and safe street crossings. Snow removal and lack of shade trees prevents me from walking. • Right on red conflict, bicycle conflict with pedestrians, educate bicyclists, make Winter Street one-way. Page 9 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey 2. Community Survey Summary A community survey was released from January 10, 2020 to February 10, 2020.The survey was publicized on the public meeting flyer, available to take at the public meeting, and distributed through the Town's and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee's existing networks. A community survey is an important element of public engagement, as not everyone has the ability to attend public meetings to express their opinions. The survey generated a total of 821 responses, 574 of which were complete responses. A full set of survey questions and responses is available in Appendix B.The following summary is based on the 574 complete responses, as this provides a more complete understanding of priorities. The majority of survey respondents (92%) were Watertown residents. Nearly half of respondents (46%)were between 30 and 49 years of age, over a quarter (27%)were between 50 and 64, while one-fifth (21%)were from 65 to 79 years old. Fewer than 5%of respondents were adults under the age of 30.Among those who opted to answer the question about gender identity, respondents skewed female, with 329 women completing the survey and 231 men. The following is a summary of the major trends that emerged from the data. Getting Around Watertown The dominant form of transportation reported in Watertown is driving alone (77%), followed closely by walking (75%).Just over half(52%) of respondents report carpooling at least once per week, and 38% report using the MBTA bus at least once a week.Just over one third (34%) of respondents report using a bicycle for transportation at least once a week as well. 1.Which transportation modes do you regularly(at least once a week)use to get a round Watertown?Select a I I that ap ply, 100 zs c } 5D 2S Page 10 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey Question 4 reveals that 70%of respondents find walking in Watertown to be just as safe in Watertown as in neighboring municipalities, compared to question 15, which shows that only 55% of respondents find conditions for biking as safe in Watertown as in neighboring communities. Overall,the survey reveals strong interest in improving conditions for both biking and walking, with several key points highlighted below: • Having important destinations close by is what people like most about walking and biking. • Motorist behavior and poor maintenance of sidewalks and streets were reported as the biggest barriers to walking and biking. • If conditions improved for walking and biking, people are most interested in taking trips for recreation/fun and exercise, followed by trips for personal errands. • Improving walking and biking connections to recreational areas, off-road paths, and schools are the highest priorities. • The top rated pedestrian facilities to improve conditions are improved street lighting, Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacons, and pedestrian refuge islands. • The top rated bicycle facilities to improve conditions are shared use paths,grade separated bicycle lanes, and buffered bicycle lanes. • The top three things respondents would like the town to do to encourage walking and biking are improved maintenance of streets and sidewalks, improved snow removal from sidewalks and paths, and construction of more/safer on-street bike lanes. Walking in Watertown The top reason people reported liking to walk in Watertown is that they are within walking distance of importance destinations (e.g., errands or shopping), as seen in results for question 2. This is noteworthy because it shows that Watertown has a foundation upon which to increase the number of walking trips, with people's origins and destinations within close proximity. 2.What do you like most about walking(including use of a mobility aid, such as a wheelchair or walker)in Watertown?Select up to three: 10D C v iy 50 _W::U a 0 `' ♦ �� tee o4y�aay�� w �a y � a E` s��`c cai by cQ\� ZT, d° b y� Page 11 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey The top three reasons people find walking to be challenging in Watertown are poorly maintained streets and sidewalks (49%),that it would take too long to reach a desired destination (39%), and feeling unsafe due to motorist behavior(38%).This reveals how the plan can address what people find challenging about walking through physical improvements to sidewalks and streets, traffic calming tactics, and through enforcement and education regarding driver behavior. It also shows that while many destinations may be within walking distance for some, as shown by the results of question 2, not all destinations are within reach by walking for the whole population, which may depend on where they reside or mobility limitations. 3.Which of the following makes walking In Watertown more challenging for you?This includer,travel using a mobility aid(such as a wheekhawr or walker)_Sclect all that apply: so — v -0 41-6 � XX , ° 6 IN k , In question 8, which asked how $.if conditions improved for walking in Watertown,what trip types would often people would take you like to take via walking(or continue/take more of if you already make different trip types by walking if these trips)?Select all that apply: conditions improved, over three- so fourths of respondents (77%) reported that they would travel on foot more often for 60 recreational/fun trips. Exercise was roughly equal at 76%, followed by personal trips like a Av shopping or visiting friends at 68%.The lowest response was for commuting to work or school, 20 at 27%.These results may illustrate a priority to improve ■ v walking conditions providing Commute to Togettoahus Personaltrips Recreatlangun Exercise Iwouldnot wnrklwhv l stopltransit (shapvng, walkfnrthese connections to parks,trails, and station Aslting Enends� trips open space. Page 12 of 16 (9) Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey Biking in Watertown Nearly half of all survey respondents (48%)were bicyclists, with 24% reporting they bike regularly and another 24% reporting they bike occasionally(see question 11). While 48%of respondents report biking either regularly or occasionally, 23%say they do not, but that they would like to bike.This is an important datum as it demonstrates room for growth: if conditions were improved,those people could be moved into the "occasionally" or"regularly" columns. Top responses to question 12, which asked "What prevents you from biking in Watertown?"were feeling unsafe due to motorist behavior(53%) and poor maintenance of streets and paths (30%). These responses mirror those that prevent people from walking in Watertown,which stresses the importance of infrastructure maintenance, as well as traffic calming, enforcement, and education to address motorist behavior. Responses to questions about biking in Watertown were similar to those regarding walking.The top response to the question on what people like best about biking in Watertown is the same as that regarding walking in Watertown: 63%of respondents note that they are within biking distance of important destinations. As with walking, this establishes a basis for increasing the number of trips taken by bike, as infrastructure improvements for safety and comfort can make these short trips more desirable. 14.What do you like most about biking in Watertown?Select up to three: BO 60 40 a 24 Gaud network Gaud network I am within Residential There are safe I do not bilcein Other•Please ofan•street otoffraad bikingdistance street with andcanvenient Waberbown spedry bicydefacilities paths ofimportant lawertraffio facilities an {eg.bike lanes, desti nations{i.e_ uolumesand majorsbreets sharedlane errands, speeds markings+ shopping When asked about what trip types people would bicycle for, or more often for, given improved conditions,the top responses were recreation/fun (69%), exercise (65%), and personal trips such as shopping or visiting friends (53%). Ranked lower were for commuting to work or school (39%), and to reach a transit stop (19%). These responses are again important because it suggests that infrastructure upgrades and policy improvements have the potential to make walking and biking trips both safe and practical transportation choices in Watertown, leading to mode shift. Page 13 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey 14_If conditions improved for biking in Watertown,what trip types would you like to take via bike(or continue/take more of if you already make these trips)?Select a[I that apply: so 60 40 V N ♦1 20 0 Commuteto To get to bus Perso-810ps Recreatiordfun Exercise I would not bike tDr worV-hpd stop/transit station lslr pin&visiting these trips friends) Questions 17 and 18 provide information on the type of trips people take by bike. With 19%of people reporting that they bike to commute to work or school a few times per year, there is potential for growth. This is a population that could increase their frequency of bike commuting if conditions were improved.This is true also for those who bike for exercise (27%a few times per year) and for personal trips (36%a few times per year). Questions 22 and 23 relate to biking to destinations in Watertown.The majority of people (38%) reach off-road paths on foot or with a mobility device,following by 32% using their bike, and one in 10 (10%) driving. This demonstrates that there is likely demand for improving walking and biking connections between off-road paths and residential neighborhoods. In ranking how important it is to have good walking and biking access to specific destinations in Watertown,the top-ranked destinations considered to be very important are schools (75%), off-road paths (72%), 22.How do you typically get to off-road paths in Watertown? L196Dther-Pleasespenfy- � I 16.S%I do rKR use off-road paths in Watertown 0,59E Take a Rus t}-2%Rideshareor Taxi ji-a-Uter. - 38.9%Walk,run ar use a mobillty LYN aid je.g.a wheelchaiO 14A9dIDriworearpool(priv be ��- vwhide) 0-4%Rikesher,e 322%Personal Hike Page 14 of 16 (9) Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey and local parks and recreation areas (71%). This reinforces the importance of improving links to parks and off-road paths, reflecting the previous results showing that recreational trips and trips for exercise are the ones that people would do more often by walking or biking. Questions 24 and 25 regard biking to school. Approximately one-third of respondents have school-age children, and of those, fewer than half have kids that walk or bike to school (15%of all survey respondents).The top three reasons given for children not walking or biking to school were concerns over motorist behavior(43%), child's young age or lack of cycling skills (39%), and living too far from school (31%). Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Survey responses in both multiple-choice and open-response questions reveal the type of improvements desired to make conditions better for walking and biking. Respondents frequently referenced Cambridge for examples of how Watertown can become more pedestrian-and bicycle-friendly.The top improvements sought to improve walking were improved street lighting (31%), installation of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (28%), pedestrian refuge islands (23%), and raised crosswalks (21%). The top improvements sought to improve bicycling conditions were construction of more off-street shared-use paths (45%), grade-separated bike lanes (37%), and buffered bike lanes (30%). 9.Pl ease scleet the top chree pedestrian fac i I i ties you wouIdf11ketosceconsidered ir) Watertown to improve walking conditions.Select up to three; dL7X&0wPBdWrlanFacility 1 FAIN CLAr~wiehd■ulmA E !PW4-W$FK4K I � 1S1°X*sc�ni45rwal� 30.4%E nh.rtitwl3e ewe 11.4Fniey 7 t I%FW ssd Rwcralk 017M C urh Uwwl ww i 7.i�CA.dti1� hh�rlanrdl 211%Pe&n&.an Amp(sand slpu! Page 15 of 16 Watertown Public Feedback Summary BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Public Meeting #1 and Community Survey 20.Ple35e select the top thr bicycle fatil[ties you wouId like to see cons6dered is Watertown to improve bikingconditions_5elect i p to three: ].F140i.h fiYtFr Faeih''td++�+ 4YX'AraLLrhFJA+rL►5a 1�77i FkYd�ka iS wMCS4+ tAKOAlurvaY,11 J_Left 4rmWWa lwbkTdlYLµwai Fert%nmaxo w*0 kl�M FL�7�F}�L — +Lpk4MM+�bUe}HF IBM i5Ql4OM-SirrrlF��+nrwin ' �7.7Y 5a�+�ey}hY�Ik4MI4M� %OWAWAA twMA 4rn Open-response questions provided additional information. When asked about what other municipalities are doing to make walking and biking safer, several improvements were noted multiple times: better enforcement of existing traffic laws, construction of more shared-use paths, and ensuring that shared-use paths and bike lanes be connected in a town-wide network, so that routes can be created connecting all neighborhoods. Specific locations noted as desirable to reach on foot or by bike include schools, greenways, parks, commercial centers, the library, residential neighborhoods, and transit stops. Finally, question 26 asked respondents to select three things they'd like Watertown to do to encourage greater walking and biking.The top three options selected were improved maintenance of streets and sidewalks (54%), improved snow removal from sidewalks and paths (39%), and construction of more/safer on-street bike lanes (33%). Page 16 of 16 Appendix B = 2 : Ww-,a Public Meeting #1 Boards �` Station 1 e ' .5. Watertown • BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN This is a project of: Department of Community Development and Planning Department of Public Works Engineering Division Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee PROJECT DESCRIPTION RELATED PROJECTS Watertown encourages active transportation—walking, biking and transit—to help reduce congestion, and improve both air ° quality and public health. The Watertown Bicycle& Pedestrian Plan will help achieve those goals by identifying and prioritizing future improvements to the Town's streets and walkways, WATERTOWN making it easier for people of all ages and abilities to choose Parking Management Plan more active forms of transportation. The plan will identify new - and improved bicycle and pedestrian connections in Watertown ' "�~ oa„� o�ks 4FAk F L and to the region's larger active transportation network, to help people get where they want to go easily and safely, and car- free. A series of public meetings and engagement with local o LI) *,community and advocacy groups will help inform the plan. PRIORITIZATION PLAN o w°new M WHO ARE WE PLANNING FOR? The Watertown Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan will make the town easier and safer for people of all ages and abilities, no matter how one chooses to get around town. 16 LI _ Ir: 4 - Minimum Walking Width Minimum Walking Width Minimum Operating Width Minimum Walking Width Minimum Operating Width Minimum Operating Width Minimum Operating Width 2'8" 2'8" TO" 8'0— 4'0" 5'8" 4'0" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Preferred Operating Width Preferred Operating Width Minimum to Make a Preferred Operating Width Preferred Operating Width Preferred Operating Width Preferred Operating Width 510" 180 Degree Turn 1010" 50" TO" 510" 5'0" Bicycle&Pedestrian height and width characteristics provided by Guide for the Planning,Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities AASHTO(2004),Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities(2012),and-Boston Complete Streets Design Guidelines(2013). TIMELINE o3 Sept 2019-Aug 2020 Sept-Dec 2019 Dec 2019-Jan 2020 Jan-May 2020 May-Aug 2020 Public Engagement Assess Existing Imagine Vision,Goals, Draft Recommendations Develop Process Conditions Opportunities,& Constraints &Next Steps Final Plan HOW DO I LEARN MORE? View the Plan's Webpage here: httr)s://www.watertown-ma.aov/957/Bicvcle-Pedestrian-Plannina-2019-2020 dLaura Wiener, Senior Transportation Planner @ Iwiener@watertown-ma.gov (617) 972-6417 Public Meeting,January 27,2020 Current e s ` ' Watertown Tr n BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN Mobility in Wntertowr Lime Bike Data Trends How could these trends shift with improved bicycle and pedestrian networks? Total Trips • per 111 People Out of every 100 residents... Between 65 drive alone to work April 2018-Sept1 17 take public transit 17,600 Lime bike A f ift0ftif f 7 Carpool trips • • in Watertown 5 Work from Home 3 Walk C four Watertown residents chooses an environmentally sustainable mode to get to work 2 Bike 1 Other 2013-2017American Community Survey Journey to Work Data ° Legend Trips More Trips Almost Lime bikes usage in Watertown is average 1 ' . of 7017o of tripsthat compared to the region Watertown started in Watertown anne n x at'n m rovemeN 1\i " �Zz Most • • routes Average vehicles • - ended Watertown `o���moe;es,ee„o„ao,mo.Km by - • - users ^` per household (1 .3) Live �` �: �,, 2014 Massachusetts vehicle census, WatertownwA�rHam summary by MAPC u._ ,` ........ / �— MgIN STREET •• Trips that start Trips that end in Watertown in Watertown Mou j• R[ JTE� ... 9 Percentage of residents Percentage of • - .. -��^^ Fs,RryRR.eRER FT -`•-' - j Watertown 70% Belmont 9%who work in... who live in... _ gRSENArSMEET Boston 27% Watertown 18% Newton 12% Waltham 9% _ \ s Nt\1 Watertown 19% Boston 16% Boston 5% Newton 6% = � �BOS N Cambridge 11% Waltham 8% Waltham 5% Although the Charles River Bike Path is the most popular MAPC Lime bike data, trips between April 1, 2018 route, on-road facilities are still needed to meet demand Waltham 6% Newton 4% and September30, 2019, "trips per 1,000 people" for more direct routes, including Main Street for those Newton 5% Cambridge 4% includes residents and employees coming from west of Watertown Square and Arsenal Street 2010 U.S. Census County to County Flows to connect east to Brighton and Cambridge. Public Meeting,January 27,2020 WatertownEx*ist*ing Co Safety BICYCLE & PEDESTRI AN PLAN Legend Corridors with the most pedestrian and bicycle crashes Total reported pedestrian and bicycle crashes(2016-2019) (2016-2019) oo Existing Conditions 9° Poor Sidewalk ` Arsenal Street ***'*** 80 �t¢ 7° 60� Fair Sidewalk Watertown Street �`�`�"h`�`�`�� 60 kpSRania 5° 37(kb Good Sidewalk w ey Main Street ���`��`�`����� ao Existing Bicycle Facility Mt.Auburn Street �Aq Z�} a° �������&#6 20 Recorded Pedestrian Crashes Arlington street AAA&& to oNpR (2016-2019) E L M O N T Pleasant Street ��A A*6*6 Common types of crashes with pedestrians and bicyclists Fresh Pond F L` Severity t (° • Fatal injury Pequ.', e =1 pedestrian crash �`=1 fatal injury &=1 bicycle crash Rear-End Bike/PedP. l \ Non-fatal injury F."PPasrl a's Cemetery Kingsley Park Property damage only(none injured) 04-'Il f�— o eE O Beacon High School ' ' �= Recorded Bicycle Crashes M"T BEET r g (2016-2019) I— Concurrentestion Traffic wngestion Traffic congestion ng Severity / �\ UneM. xp ectedstrian crossing Right/eft Hook Non-fatal injury j 3N IL Property damage only(none injured) w nt aOn crashcluaer ['Rmgelawn cemetery007-2016) LA M B R I D V E ivs WA LT F-I RRE me,RnRRed Lowell Schonl o Conniff School � � �� 60.PniE BTBEEI l A \ " R<ET .R Assls[ed/Senlor Housing Star Market CE ' • IgN �W E Vlttory Oakley Coun[rY Club O rc �� q F"UE '' •S OR 90 � "ORORL sr S Field RFpr SOA • w • •M4IN STREET W ...,• Whitney Watertown Middle School HI II Perk h �C hdge Sri,re • Senlor H.—rg V Mt.Auburn �9``fT • Cemetery COMMUNIryp�N L�F • �yE�� AF w .•• Watertown High School MOUNT AUBURN STREET ••'•n.......••"� v � �Atrium School r"°b Salronstall �'e � � £ Park < Er "� Asssisted/5I nor Housing m Jewish Community Day School — Farmer's Market yp ySP� y Hosl�r School nl �¢ ;' S[.Stephen's Arnie-an School �NE :.•'.Town Hall Assisted/Senior Housin� P ' Fili pella Slio� • ark //r orte �� • J Park Allison •., � A � PLEASANT STRE[r J irk q' R�Market �••• .-'L.rtown Square•••. 'LLL c-ceamlveatry MassDOT identified . a caMBRIWB-W"ems • �o"OGEp Cry bicycle crash cluster Stop n Shop Casey (2007-2016) Park "RE^CONnREE} Stearns F� Park t�"'6 • Sidewalk conditions vary throughout 010 town,with most major corridors in fair to • good condition and local neighborhood Arsenal streets in poorer condition. Boyd Park ' Park Perkins School for Blind oe t Charles 0.lvet �. 3 out of 7 pedestrian crashes on Watertown MassDOT identified \\S ! Street resulted in a fatality pedestrian crash cluster , Hanoran TON (2007-2016) Only 11%of bicycle crashes did not Fiela and Property result in injury The majority of existing bicycle facilities go through town in Comple. Damage Fatallnjury -- an east-west direction Only Al Non-fatal Property Injury Damage Only a - W>SNrNGtoN I_ Non-fatal (` Injury RI V O JT N lP E NBNQ\� V Ill �ptfa o�5 M�pcN�f� Data source:MassDOT crash data portal,recorded crashes 2016-2019. Public Meeting,January 27,2020 tS WatertownSummar of On - Go• n Bic cle & Pedestr•an Pro•ecBICYCLE & PEDESTRI AN PLAN Watertown Community Path oa. Legend The path will connect the Watertown-Cambridge Greenway to Pleasant Street to Watertown Square Existing Bicycle Facilities and the Charles River.The segment from School Street to Irving Street is already complete with a Planned Intersection Improvement separated two-way bicycle lane on Arsenal Street. WAVER LEY L,sitania Planned Bicycle Facility T Field Prioritized Complete Streets Intersection Improvement C°NCcp ••••r Prioritized Complete Streets Corridor Improvement ° � � BELMOV ME l"` / Ev", Fresh Pond 2 g / Pro°scene Reconstruction of Mount Auburn Street ri I—r•s Market \ Pa,k Curb extensions,traffic signal improvements,and buffered Fresh Pond Reconstruction of Main Street,Waverley / bicycle lanes will be added from Patten Street to Belmont G°It C-rse st.Pamcks cemetery Street.Construction is estimated to begin in Spring 2022. gingak Avenue toThaxter Street -�„_ � 9 P 9 Park Bicycle lanes,curb extensions,and traffic signal / eeae�H,gh School improvements at Waverley Avenue will be added aE`M°"'sRE j claeken loo., yY to Main Street.The project is currently in / " Held / E planning/design. / . i■W ON W �. , •. � tpy�Au�gi/j5RRryt - y' � + , � ' James Russell Lowell School •�� ' 6 IDGE no�itsmooi-' S 3 /•• �.� j wRRE � •` •,, � � eMtTSE STAE ', ••• •� NSM Assisted/Senior Housing � p , � I Star Market • ••♦N♦N •EN"F � ♦•'+ . � ��- RRYs oN ♦ Ec % 1. ;Ld �� victory Oakley country aub ' Watertown-Cambridge Greenway Extension •••. 3 R�i� Field o 9q The Watertown-Cambridge Greenway will be extended by 1.25 "�TRaEr ♦♦„ .rf� , miles into Cambridge connecting to Fresh Pond and regional • ' bike paths.The extension is under construction. W s Wa[ertown Mtltlle School Whitney ♦ C liiiiiiii 5 are "- ♦ < Hill Park $ g qu � Sen or Hous ng .♦ ♦r coMMpN,�♦ f •♦ - MourvTALBURk STPEEi ■m �S-'F - _ • ee_ - ♦'� .ia Watertown High School �m '4 . Atrium Scho Y" Ry�fT 1 � Assisted/susing •` Its ~� / lew sh Communrt Day school tt�AMs saltons[all Farmers Mart E e��' Ym - ♦ rAEn Hosmer School y � Ts�le Park To Hall ♦ T � ( j St.Stephens Armen an School �F Watertown ♦ . �Assisted/Senlor Housi g S / Stopn Shop � {`/' Public Library ♦ ♦ a � \ Russo's Market PEEASAni sinE Forte \A � Park � — 007illill square / EAM80.,WE.Wp��G n �VO<+Ep�J Complete Streets Prioritization Plan /Stop n Shop •■'■ `� (As noted in legend) � � • � .••■ The Complete Streets Plan was completed in May 2018 and includes 24 / ,\sNN i�♦park "` ■ '•R�Ne sin r• pedestrian and bicycle projects recommended for implementation by Town qpy• ■ `� / / Council.Three projects were funded for construction in 2020: Spark' ,�■ ■ ` • , wESTEa""E"UE o Raised crosswalk on Warren Street at Cunniff School ■■ ••.•• __ •• o Raised crosswalk on Whites Avenue at Linear Park and widening of ••.■• _ _ �\ / Community Path through Saltonstall Park Perkins Schoolror Blind a j / %_ i Ar o Crosswalk improvements on Watertown Street at Theurer Park + soy�� / 2�— senal Park Annual Road Program:Town-wide This program includes the reconstruction of sidewalks and implementation ofADA-compliant curb ramps. / Bike lanes,shoulders,or shared lane markings J� .© /J/ 1`e`f/t _ `— -�� (sharrows)are added where feasible.Since 2015 there "p /1 `) _,- f✓ ©- III have been seven miles of roadway repaved and °e �•-,�, 'Jjjj-• `' /(I j p`Y; Watertown Square Improvements •AssAERuse - sidewalks reconstructed. N TON Design alternatives are being evaluated for a multimodal approach to the Square.Some multimodal approaches Ali�'%\.`,S•%• "✓J i© •"� were identified in the MassDOT Arsenal Street Corridor Study. Y9i'=•\. �• �, --�„ _ ®I - i__, Galen Street at Watertown Street&Nonantum Road II I Safety improvements will be provided at this high crash location JI (identified by MassDOT 2016-2019),with construction estimated „ -- W" T to begin in Spring 2023. A i `. eETteN N NE{yYo I _ Ice ✓U WrSNW+ETO S[0.EET Watertown Sgrrare N Improvements Project � Public Meeting,January 27,2020 Station 2 Watertown KeyWords BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN When the Steering Committee and Bicycle & Pedestrian Committee were asked about challenges, opportunities, and what a successful bicycle and pedestrian plan looks like, the following key words emerged. Bold words were heard multiple times. What is the greatest opportunity presented with this project? lk4k Improve safety Focus on all people Enhance vibrancy Increase mode shift/mode choice Increase local/neighborhood connectivity (resident trips) Incorporate private development Change culture/educate population Remove physical impediments to walking/biking What is the biggest challenge this project will face? Predominant car culture AV Dedicated funding Post-construction maintenance (snow) V:wAa E-scooters/emerging modes Needs of specific populations (aging, blind and low vision) Pace of change and development Public Support Creating a vision Ongoing project coordination (i.e., Watertown Square) What does a successful plan look like to you? o Now... and 10 years from now? Shifting mode choices — especially for short trips Changing culture OO Development of a strategic and measurable plan Safe, connected network Short & long term improvements Enhance vibrancy Public Meeting,January 27,2020 Watertown Recommend ateio ns ro m BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN Prev'16ous Plans Watertown for All Ages Mount Auburn Street Project (2018) Focus Group Resort (2019) • Increase pedestrian safety with "road diet" concept to reduce pedestrian crossing lengths • Improve sidewalks, but and increase visibility at crosswalks maintain trees• Improve snow removal on • Provide safe, continuous bicycle facilities sidewalks • Ensure bicyclists and scooters Mount Auburn Street A Complete Streets Project do not obstruct sidewalks • Provide tactile markings for blind/low vision pedestrians • Increase use of and improve Watertown Comprehensive Plan (2015) pedestrian audible signals Goal 3 • Improve crossings by reducing crossing distances and Pedestrians and Bicycle Access. Promote, improving timing on walk lights improve and enhance pedestrian and bicycle J access and facilities to ensure that Watertown can accommodate non motorized forms of transportation. Watertown Parking Management Plan (2019) • Reduce parking demand Watertown Community Path Survey (in commercial areas) by (2010) enhancing access for non— I would use the path to access shops I would use the Path for vehicle modes and restaurants in Watertown Square exercise and recreation • Plan for more bicycle parking " near commercial hubs "'t' 4 • Invest in additional crosswalks and pedestrian infrastructure ri 3 between parking lots and Agree stores to enhance walkability WP 78% and safety (in business n=255 n=255 districts) • Agree • Somewhat Agree • Neutral • Somewhat Disagree • Disagree Complete Streets Prioritization Plan (2018) WEST AND CENTRAL WATERTOWN PRIORITY PROJECTS CENTRAL AND EAST WATERTOWN PRIORITY PROJECTS ial pro Farmers pore �alno Iects Pequoutte Park ksts Qat Raised Crossing Market ryoll St Qnt Aaised Crossing O Ped.Curb Ramps - Q FRESH POND Q Ped.Curb Ramps Q ImbsemmRedesign St Patrick's 'a Q na. Redesign Q Crosswalklmprovementx ` qA, Cemetery £_ Q Crosswalk lmprovemmn Q Activated Flashing Beacons q� mOn(5t , 0 Aaivared Flashng Beacom Q Bigck Pah'ng ....Path St o3 =So N` O E __..� Belmont _ •.Path •••••••Bike Baulevak/SUA H ¢— --- "c/° "•••B ke Boulevard/SIM a c ......Conrtaflow Biketane/SIM %� � .......Contrallow B"ketone/SIM -----•Skexalk Reps r/TaficCalmiig / e Mayjo M to if""de A ------Skewalk Repar/TraficGlmiig prorementz pe Millm '� ConN«Improveme«s ConM«Im nAP °A 17 n vP aC gT ExistingC bl° / aps e O —.a MSRtoBaatTrctlAew tloBaUwuYsns ReReM otl uRetosei�gn IRMgasescDt OUTn/dDerCwPoa y , ���'gAkn "� c yAar Public N9 --- SM1 .9 Cc Wo;rC 'P 5Rtd Waygl°u1v.Y1d 5yga eLP 8,� °Ld'e5r SPnre!/� ¢ J ', &-istln9 CSSOtM1nattleio[tllo wn ns edP aRtoha (dP llaMnauD) BM1aePath Ridg.lw 0 p UsePathe Q MABus Roe Sthoal $h ofmtery d J flhbu9 OT/MPo p`. J. I y`' 'nwpe Rd p FCC \ /Star Market Roatlway RMesign Pro]ect Underway 0' Town Hall ♦�'Ay Ga re°Sr xg' esrPrSt I 5l! a� N }°' Oab p3' qyg Q Town Hall © Asskletl/Seni«Hausin9 / 1& , +. ��,1 �PPWAPF © 3 c SOttnioo�{{���V� s C.ntrY Club C �O m �' _ ® Asssted/Senior Housing Q Retail/Shopping Destinatim a i D, • , $OC aLt1 y¢�c H Bel/eyeeR £ y 3 f% ® Reail/Sh Dmination 0 SCMaI a N C� h,• 2�Sr d i O a d u MaP/ewo r 3 '�, a scrwol �ping c° e' • ��� Watertown N7� whin y/ , MAdI Seho I Y °�' Hl", ��ir o. $ a SWllvan `requency°fRe oum dedPrgecn by Type <+ ii fleltl oo Q y4 p.Yground•� sore Na o-M, tl49 n Estate sh Sl °e.V_ �, ?Brigham St N 3o e,ut Gn~DON Stoneleigh Rd Markets W o ac BrOWn SChool MoaleY yP¢ h 5 _ f MOlmt ,� I Mt.Aubum /� / / Aubur S PWYground C` 3 Playgrou� '�.� z O--^ 1e(�Colo,obia n a 3 Pb� s v — cemetery �t� d 76 Qo,�e` IT — as N 15 1 oa 22a O'Connell rlotmer ti �° " r o° o P i re P t tercown cn 23' s Athletic Fields lewah School try ♦ Bemis m y ♦`73•P �� 5 Ili nool / s<nenl o_s A / y ♦�+e Pla J `SaltonsU* �.� ¢ g ; n® ve awford St Re Da School Ygrou Walthamst phMsants[ ro�O F,¢ Park ♦r�� ,��,8 5Q ' sSa CTbrd o j' IG ©� a'o D geS ©n ��' ,o r 4. �anae '. °riston`'` %zEy 5 <® Cooktlge Hill Rd •a{ Q �'ranrsr Woteews�4 _ eta 'may J1�r ♦♦14 ,`�� s`� r b sr g •aS M NNN7777 tQ,eS ��;°' Qs� ♦♦ ��, Pumam Str �.+� a stops shop m Cllafles RtNe Affl n vy ♦♦ . Qs..` ai Spruce St F t Q glkpelb "©"Ausso's Market Park �o CYpress St .itC Alaaygmurm P� e a c is BPoeBerw onnalonga 2 n ll/foatbndge pyk� California 1 0 0 �(\ Stop o ShapQ `+� aN j� �4 N 1 '" °� 19 Aldnch Rd g ee— R' , • �°q�eacon St ► ti E E Mold unions[ ate. s y 20 ti¢¢eo 3 _ g `�� Perkins School Farmers° 1 b 16 v CaPh.1s, ,-rthe Blind £ _ Market h O i Morse St 2 Cb ,', O Arsenal Pak f4Renou9l`BW°/ v CHI' Public Meeting,January 27,2020 Watertown Your Feedback BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN CoUse a sticky note to tell us what feedback from prior efforts is most important to incorporate r address in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. / �d.e 4 VIA,&8� LID 'YVI >rlk Ipe� R-o �rcrinu..(� 3\uQ. et 53�� to !�✓ICit4$P (�lSr{���i� vvA2(�✓4.A%kt�x4 S vo. ✓VW�' � =�'e�ul� ISM �. ai^�7C / 0 _gL� 17, �oa 110 ,� js n�, f o✓I�e�'r�ou' nr, gcw ��, (J �C C(vzru� Awe e�,tea� slgna a+ � ( -Th s 4o(J+n needs s. curbs and 5{ree+ f1d�r~�ss� r..,�\ ��.z�r trzeSl. The 5"h'eets ":V-1A Ground C-U-4f and middle Sc.kioo is Qf2 fi4 C"'j dar!fmuS f't4ds I II'' Y I Rnryea� ('} qwv- ISp; St,ow;ewu�S �, s;8ewaks: ✓� �j,,5,v�e S5 c��jN�CTf �e(/-((C�i 't-ti B I "'n �8 �.y "`s 6Y PV�^-^"�• � P,S lower revdvol( d ky Saes 1$e �f �ik2 Owly q°'r1<�'"5 a r kY s w S by Ue r S• / - �e��u,�.a1�l,a�l� �Y✓�tY„S-t.k��S'd<sbu� Sx� ��/1 u1 �A\S��Ca OaR L� 6e1'ti ��ls,�jrl»�s red '�; cl Sh�dl�aidi7 'F° �CvV1�' Sj �IneC� a�d��Iy-ow4" c� fi[c 5G> 4J rloaas IS I aw 1 c1};�✓ws �,cti<IQ�u,.l?�`� 5 w s� e ie - 2e d ✓M�'� F2,Q, F-m,Ts I,�Ite Pa�ncS mgWte41 �y��orc,C „��h �bv L��{'Fi��(� 'Srrue(e��' soil Gq It lod. nVL'. ✓L��< V^xn� /.n�-- II a� new commecciSl �,V15`- t'110SCC C,S _ G� „✓l L �I- c'•e.r�f/�' ` 7,v-Q, 7'I`R. �' T✓� [on5icue4?m � Si�e� C1mn4� �Tq�\'J 0. 1 OC'Se S � CD�k 4.��I• Public Meeting,January 27,2020 Station 3 • ` ' Watertown Pedestrian Issues BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN & Legend Poor Sidewalk Condition ' Opportunities • Existing Raised Intersection �w>er 1 Improve sidewalks for accessibility,especially to provide connections to Main Street and Planned Intersection Improvement P"°° the Charles River • Planned Raised Crosswalk WAyBRL� • Improve connectivity between destinations Planned Sidewalk Reconstruction T Prioritized Complete Streets Intersection Improvement 3 Improve access to Charles River Path from commercial areas and greenway Prioritized Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Issue 4 Provide connectivity and circulation between residential and commercial areas Vill Opportunity �6 Park I resM1 Pond Z,Course Farmer's Market \ Kingy pow j St. sle Patric k's Cemetery \ Park Wph♦�� 5\� Beaco\High School Field \� Glacken eld Belmont Cemetery E 1 '� 1 �\� CAM RICE Ridgelawn Cemetery -__ S lanes Russell Lowell School / ��Sag N Assirtc:i r Hausln61 > `. 1 F 8 2 star Market• • 3 �re`y Oaklev Country Club � GegpMGNo,Noaoq / FleltlFAd 91Nsgtn �e"a� ♦1•♦ I Pa _ k •town Middle Scnool HR e W xW CooliCge Sq•re♦♦ + Senior Housing � � ♦♦- j • aY9 • r"POA Mt.Auburn I eaT � e� Cemetery . • • ••.••iNj7V%•••'♦ n Watertown High School Improve access between w —umscnool a =>qF� • "y' ?�. Via• �t ' ♦♦� •. residents and Arsenal saltonrtall' - C . Atsirted/Senior Housing yards and to Charles River / Jewish CommunityJ`O• W Park Fvz^mer's Market • '� ♦ •-� Hosmer School pc n Day5cM1ool� �v. M[N+Msrye� HS[.Step ool a+ Hall `g _ 1 Wa,ertown Asi ea/SeniPrH 2 / sropn snoP to Public Library u (/ 2 2 PSanvm S[gse* �e fIIIPPeJIo 2 \ RusSo's Market Park Allison .I^ Park Park h ' _ 3�\ �'� - 1 CroS1M� Calvary z � •• cemerery • ••♦ �_.. /StoPn•Shoe ♦ _.__ 2 duo / .PK ♦Casey ` • NPI.TIe . • •• ♦pS aS", Pork Stearns /l Park / \ . • • •• q�j wt \ 2 e\ • I Perki•School br Blind �� ' _\ 'k$'y'v�. n / 2. 2 Issues �� ' — �arteSB,Ner 3 1 Poor sidewalk conditions(as noted ) \\/ � � pmHeM L,P.,g,kMIHPR.MPMKwA, RPR.R M.p a PN as �—�_\ MAs:Awpatt,StaBRP�K� �_ 2 Inadequate pedestrian crossings rD�=irte.,'coornnectivity between nGreenway and 3 Conflicts between pedestrians and bikers on shared path due to narrow width Chales River Path R[MoryisMPn 4 Lack of safe and comfortable pedestrian accommodations in Watertown Square Use dot stickers to identify the top two areas you would like to see improvements Town-Wide Pedestrian Network for pedestrians. Limit 2 dots per person. If you have an issue or opportunity not Issues and Opportunities Identified by Steering Committee and Bicycle & Pedestrian Committee noted on the map, record it on an index card. Public Meeting,January 27,2020 Issues WatertownBicycle & Opport n • •esBICYCLE & PEDESTRI AN PLAN . Legend � Opportunities 100, Existing Bicycle Facilities Planned Intersection Improvement 1 Improve access to commercial areas and add bike parking WAVERLEY V Planned Bicycle Facility 2 Improve connections to schools �k Prioritized Complete Streets Intersection Improvement x e •• Prioritized Complete Streets Corridor Improvement / 3 Improve connections between modes with new development Issue / Opportunity / 4 Opportunity for north-south connection ` Pe,Po,s�te mer'sMarket \� Park 5 Consider access to Greenway j St.PeickzCemetery \ Er oA'[Saono --" w"Hep,% a<MP R`a`°"Ig"`"°°' 6 Improve access to Charles River Path 7 Consider bike crossing treatments 2 / , 4 4 R well Lowell School M B I D G E 4 t tame,P 3y� Rldgelawn Cemetery "CunniHScnool W ��` ,��. Aszizted/Senior Housing $tar Market / + t .fits♦ Victory �P,. • kd'♦ Oakley Country Club 3 d MaHs1RfR ♦w ♦ �9peT 2 4 c 5 r W�rgrt Mitltlle scnoPl VlLltney + 1 or Housin8 .qy HIII Park 1 �P,e square Desired connection to - Greenway&Community Path toMM M[.Auburn °rymM.x ci,e ' 91F"'. '`yM atenow High school rvi,..xu"Hm"ttr 4 rium Scnnol ♦ . �� d"S 4 a/se mrHOPzmg j A / mwi:nc mmmrcv oaysrnoPl H'+u"AMstett, salmnnan Parmer•.Market .HoameamoPl Aa s.step smom Par 5 HP 4 Shop ,aW' wnPubl ert d�seem. Desire for contra-Flow bike • ruip i. \ Russo'z Marke[PtenSu(rnx[[i Forte Park Jre \ - Park Allison a/improved connectivity .}> .-� Park ;. Mt.Auburn St. 7 3 - �� l --- camas smP n ♦•• 1 cemetery / •♦♦ • • .. Kc �.cauv '4 t • 6 �♦Z� Park • � ,. Parrk t • g se A" ,3,< '� 2 • •.�••� \ 1 E + Perkm,schaol f r 1i1md \ \Par _ �grVWA• 2 �� / Chadas R✓er \\ �� Issues RP�,H„MgPAP 1 Lack of north-south connections 2 Inadequate regional connections Mass Pike is / i a north/south barrier 3 Charles River Path inadequate for both bikers and walkers due to narrow width to Watertown 4 Lack of bike parking at META bus yard and in commercial areas Use dot stickers to identify the top two areas you would like to see improvements Town-Wide Bicycle Network for p0dum0wrows. Limit 2 dots per person. If you have an issue or opportunity not Issues and Opportunities Identified by Steering Committee and Bicycle &Pedestrian Committee noted on the map, record it on an index card. Public Meeting,January 27,2020 �' Watertown Exi*sflongBi*cycle Level Traffic BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN LX BICYCLE LEVEL OF STRESS ELMON _ WAVERLEY 1 Tj m F Low Stress High Stress °ryogo _ CRITERIA * Separated bike lane Buffered bike lane Bike lane with Shared lane with Shared lane with parking and/or frequent bus route multi-lane vehicular * Shared lane with Bike lane with no infrequent bus route traffic or speed>35 Pe9unssene I speed<30 mph parking and no bus * Shared lane with mph or with ADT> Park Parmeka market and with ADT route * Shared lane with speed between 15,000 / st.Pao-mk•a cemecery <2,000 speed between 30 30 mph and 35 * Shared lane with and 35 mph or with mph or with ADT wn Ea�EyO" r Reacn,High Schnnl speed<30 mph and ADT between 4,000 between 10,000 with ADT between and 10,000 and 15,000 2,000 and 4,000 WALTHAM Ridgelawn Cemetery ll Lowell Schaal lames Russe r unnlff schenl r 'm CA M B R I D G E Assisted/Semar Housing F � Star Market � Oakley Country Club � ` / Victory \ • �� GEARYsyND,ryoRr / Field N 1 •-�� / Waterto Middle Sch`I Whitney ((/^\\\ Coolidge Square Sen'r\ Hill Park nq F` q of Mt.Auburn `� c� Watertown Hlgh School � �` '��� r ^t Atrium School �. ` y , Assisted/Senior,Ho sing '^ = � •�� sah9natah . r I wish Community Day School- F!n1Pr's Mark Park et y THgN� K .Stephen's Armen an School / Aaa.ted/—SSenlnrHousin J` Water` g Stop n Shop �� ` Public Library / Russo's Market vLEPSPNT aiaE[T ForteFfli .�' Park Allison Park _ I Park 1� Watertown 59uare -..tom / GEN � /Stop Shop NPj a ark rk RFET P Stearns Park — WEStEaN PVENUE Perkins School for ehnds a? . 9oVd y 1 APark *WTO N Park f� °Ep,ER=r,EEpR°PP —�,/ B 0 STO N /Chat\eS RNer Halloran —�' Field and NORTH,,1S 51Uk Sports ' rsrq NONANTOMR n i& Complex � tT ° aNPixE w P ~ / Draft January 2020 Station 4 Watertown Toolbox BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian facilities enhance the everyday walking experience for people of all ages and abilities. Typically, pedestrian facilities can positively impact the average person's walking experience in a few different ways: they can make walking on sidewalks a more pleasant, convenient, and attractive experience; they can improve the visibility of pedestrian crossings; and they can also encourage people to stay and enjoy the public environment, which can increase the overall vibrancy of a particular neighborhood or commercial area. Mew Description: Description: Detectable warning panels are applied at curb Pedestrian refuge islands reduce the distance ramps to provide a tactile cue where pedestrians a pedestrian must cross at one time,reducing will cross into another zone,such as the street or a 1 exposure time in the intersection.They are ideal bicycle lane. i for locations with high speeds and traffic volumes, and where there are three or more lanes of traffic. They can be seen at crossings on Main Street in Buffered areas on both sides of the island should be front of the Watertown Public Library. considered. A pedestrian refuge island is used for the crossing across North Beacon Street at Watertown Square. Places to Use: Neighborhood Street,Commercial Corridor, Places to Use: Regional Connector,Recreation,Near Schools Commercial Corridor,Regional Connector • • • i • • • • • - • • • • • i - • • 0 Description: Description: '® START CROSSING An audible pedestrian signal communicates • RRFBs use an irregular flash pattern to alert motorists Watch For information about the crossing,such as"walk" to a crossing pedestrian.They can be activated by Vehicles ' and"don't walk"at signalized intersections. a push button or through a pedestrian detection DON'T START ©; Finish Crossing Push buttons are located low enough to be - _ system. - II Started _ TIME REMAINING " accessible for persons with mobility challenges r ,- Tn Finish Crossing and incorporate vibrotactile surfaces for visually y An RRFB is used on Main Street in between © hoNT CROSS impaired pedestrians. Watertown Town Hall and Watertown Public Library. PUSH BUTTON q _ °CROSS They are used at the intersection of Arsenal Street and Irving Street. Places to Use: Places to Use: - Neighborhood Street,Commercial Corridor, Commercial Corridor,Regional Connector,Near Regional Connector,Recreation,Near Schools Schools Description: r �_ -L- a Description: 7- ,'.', Street lighting at a crosswalk increases the comfort . MW Pedstrian Hybrid Beacons(also called HAWK and safety for pedestrians traveling at night. - beacons)are activated by pedestrians and display Lighting can be placed on both sides of the street I � - IE three phases of lights to oncoming vehicles to warn at and approaching pedestrian crosswalks to SPEED them to prepare to stop,to stop,and to proceed HUMP improve pedestrian visibility to drivers. with caution if no pedestrians are present.Pedestrian . ■ Hybrid Beacons provide protected pedestrian ® • crossings as needed and include accessibility features - such as an audible message and vibrating arrow 11R- button to announce when the WALK signal is active. / Places to Use: _ Places to Use: 7/ Neighborhood Street,Commercial Corridor, Commercial Corridor,Regional Connector,Near Regional Connector Schools Description: Description: Decorative treatments can be used in crosswalks A leading pedestrian interval(LPI)gives pedestrians to improve crosswalk visibility,promote traffic a head start when entering an intersection with a calming,and to enhance the vibrancy of public corresponding green signal for traffic traveling in spaces.Treatments may include brick or other the same direction.This increases the visibility of patterned surfaces. pedestrians in a crosswalk to turning vehicles. —� Decorative crosswalks are used at the intersection of Waverley Avenue and Orchard Street. A� R PARKING Places to Use: Places to Use: s�■llr�ill������ _M Neighborhood Street,Commercial Corridor, rPARKING Neighborhood Street,Commercial Corridor,Regional Regional Connector,Recreation,Near Schools Connector,Recreation,Near Schools Public Meeting,January 27,2020 Watertown Toolbox BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN Bicycle Facilities Bicycle facilities are the building blocks for creating healthier, more sustainable alternatives for transportation networks where people rely heavily on automobiles for daily trips. Currently only 2% of Watertown residents bike to work, although almost 20% work within Watertown. Bicycle facilities can offer a convenient way for people to shift shorter, local trips to a more sustainable mode. There is a wide variety of bicycle facilities which offer different levels of comfort, physical, and perceived safety for people who wish to ride their bicycles, so it is important to think of the types of people who would ideally be using a facility when selecting elements to include in a local bicycle network. MEMO Description: Description: Buffered bicycle lanes resemble traditional bicycle Bicycle signals can be used at signalized intersections lanes with painted markings,but contain a painted e to provide distinct phases for bicyclists.They can buffer separating the bicycle lane from adjacent improve the safety and visibility of bikers by providing moving vehicular traffic.A double buffer provides a green signal ahead of vehicular traffic. protection from both moving vehicles and parked cars. -►� A double buffered bicycle lane will be provided on � SIGNAL Mt.Auburn Street. rrj, I Places to Use: Neighborhood Street,Commercial Corridor, ' Places to Use: Regional Connector irK Commercial Corridor,Regional Connector N Description: Description: Separated bicycle facilities are physically separated Contra-flow bicycle lanes can be installed on a one- from vehicular traffic.They can facilitate bicycle way street to allow bicyclists two-way access.This connections along roadways where on-road can help prioritize the most direct route possible facilities may be too stressful for users.They may for bicyclists by providing direct connections to bus be further protected from traffic with a parking stops in neighborhoods where one-way streets are lane or planting strip. prevalent. Places to Use: Places to Use: Commercial Corridor,Regional Connector Neighborhood Street,Commercial Corridor e Description: Description: A two way bicycle lane allows bicyclists to move A two stage turn bicycle box provides a dedicated in both directions along a roadway.They can be space and visible way for bicycles to make a turn used on streets where contra-flow bicycle travel is across traffic,such as turn left from a right-side desired or where one side of the street provides a bicycle lane.Bicyclists are able to make this turn more direct connection to another bicycle facility. — without having to merge into traffic lanes. Buffers or separation should be used to reduce the level of stress experienced by cyclists. A two stage turn bicycle box is used on Arsenal Street at Irving Street. A two-way separated bicycle lane is provided on Arsenal Street. Places to Use: Places to Use: Commercial Corridor,Regional Connector Commercial Corridor,Regional Connector I'I Description: Description: IBicycle boxes are designated areas at the front of a i A protected intersection provides physically traffic lane at a signalized intersection that provide separated crossings and designated waiting areas bicyclists with a dedicated waiting space and for bicyclists at each intersection approach,using visible way to get ahead of vehicles when a traffics. a combination of tools.This increases the level signal turns from red to green. a "y, y of comfort for bikers by increasing visibility and sightlines to turning vehicles and reducing the time A bicycle box is under construction on Common and distances bikers are exposed to conflict. Street at Spring Street. — Places to Use: Places to Use: Commercial Corridor,Regional Connector Commercial Corridor,Regional Connector Public Meeting,January 27,2020 Station 5 aVision • • ` ' Watertown Drafting BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN x Heir) draft the vision for the Watertown Bicvcle & Pedestrian Plan Using a total of 4 dot stickers, place them on the statements you think are most or least important to the vision for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. You may distribute them however you would like. The Town of Watertown will support a bicycle and pedestrian network thatl IM -0 s Very Important Neutral Not Important ► Is interconnected within town and to neighboring communiti • • Is safe and accessible for all users • • • Is inclusive of people of all ages and abilities • • • Promotes a culture of walking and biking 000 • • Supports vibrant public spaces 0000 0 • Supports healthy lifestyles • • • Supports town goals for climate change • • Supports a multimodal environment • 0 • pp • • Has dedicated funding for implementation and personnel • • • 000 0 Public Meeting,January 27,2020 Watertown Emerging Trends BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN Based on what you have learned tonight, rate how important it is to you for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan to address each emerging trend. Use one dot sticker to vote on each trend. 211111111111111 _11110 The Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan will... Very Important Neutral Not Important Transaortation Choice: Expand choices f • • p is is walking and biking 0 * 40 Culture Change: • Work towards a more multimodal culture • • • N• et :Saf Y __• • • • Create a safe network for everyone �. Connectivity: see is Develop a connected network for everyone • • N • • • E Vibrancy: • • n public es • • Enhance pub c spaces •• • is • • Reaional Connertion I m rove atewa • ••• •• p g Y corridors to neighboring communities 0 •N• 40 • • • • we miss • - Please use an index card to record an emerging trend not captured here that is important to you. Public Meeting,January 27,2020 Appendix B = 3 : ,,.,� nd Community Survey Results A` Report for Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan - Public Survey Response Counts Completion Rate: 69.9% Complete 574 Partial 247 Totals:821 1. Which transportation modes do you regularly (at least once a week) use to get around Watertown? Select all that apply: 100 75 c 0 P 50 CD n 25 0 0`b �e at ��z Q� G `p *Ile `e\e• rep +�P 1 Value Percent Responses Bike (Personal) 33.9% 261 Bike (Bikeshare) 1.7% 13 Bus (MBTA) . 35.2% 271 Car(Drive alone) 77.5% 596 Car(Drive with others) ` 51.2% 394 Mobility aid (e.g.,wheelchair) 0.5% 4 Taxi/Rideshare (i.e. Uber, Lyk etc) I 7.4% 57 Walk ' 71.8% 552 Other- Please specify: 2.6% 20 2.What do you like most about walking (including use of a mobility aid, such as a wheelchair or walker) in Watertown? Select up to three: 80 60 N 40 - 20 i 0 NEEL-, aQ �.F oQ 5 a`5 ace ��o ye oat a�5 e��� e5��o Qeoe sreo y��o, Ore 0 ..NCO 5 c° ey eo a`er o° a��°° °Y°55 ego ��pe F�° A%° ee�� r 111 bra a3eo`a 5& ee 5� �o 2 Value Percent Responses Good network of sidewalk and paths 49.0% 333 1 am within walking distance of important destinations (i.e.errands, 67.5% 458 shopping) Character of walking environment/lots of interesting things to look at ■ 32.7% 222 Accommodations are in place for people with disabilities 4.3% 29 Most streets are narrow and easy to cross with shortwaits when there I 20.2% 137 are signals There are safe and convenient crossings on majorstreets LA 28.1% 191 Other- Please specify: 8.4% 57 3. Which of the following makes walking in Watertown more challenging for you? This includes travel using a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or walker).Select all that apply: 50 c N i 0 a`°�\ `yea 5�0� �'1\0 �olee5����`o �oo�°y��\o °o o� �o `� �.a�� ��� � o oX� �QQ o°�� r`°1e `o°�o cey�e �r�,e�rea e�moo aey�i °Yoo��or a`oQA�ti °n`,0 5 J�o a\o o ° cb te�Y FJ\ Nc ie e %I\ e°yam �oYo e e ice �Fe y` \,A e J a�,e eelspC era \o NO 5E 0 �J ee 3 Value Percent Responses I have a disability or other health impairment 5.0% 32 Itwould take me too long to reach my desired destination ' 36.5% 233 There are no showers or changing rooms at my work/school/or other 2.7% 17 destination I need to drive to make multiple trips (ex.drop-off children, medical 24.8% 158 appointment) The streets/sidewalks/paths are poorly maintained ' 45.8% 292 1 often have heavy or bulky items requiring a motor vehicle to transport ' 29.2% 186 1 feel unsafe walking/biking on our streets and sidewalks due to 36.4% 232 motorist behavior I am concerned aboutcrime and/or personal safety 4.2% 27 I'm just not interested in walking 6.0% 38 4. Is walking in Watertown safer, the same, or less safe than walking in neighboring towns? 13%Less safe 16%Safer 71%The same 4 Va lue Percent Responses Safer 15.6% 108 The same 71.4% 494 Less safe ' 13.0% 90 Totals:692 5. Please tell us which neighboring towns you think are safer for walking, and why: bostoi infrastructure sidewalk traffic streetswalk bel mont newton safer cambridgelights speea cars sidewalks street crosswalks watertown people pedestrianmaintained signalsmarked crossings 6. How often do you walk, run, or travel with a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or walker) on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses Commute to work/school Count 86 57 44 24 367 578 Row% 14.9% 9.9% 7.6% 4.2% 63.5% 5 Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses To getto a bus stop/transit station Count 78 67 97 88 259 589 Row% 13.2% 11.4% 16.5% 14.9% 44.0% Personal trips (shopping,visiting friends) 41 142 135 60 215 593 Count 6.9% 23.9% 22.8% 10.1% 36.3% Row Recreation/fun Count 53 145 120 50 219 587 Row% 9.0% 24.7% 20.4% 8.5% 37.3% Exercise Count 69 139 103 52 222 585 Row% 11.8% 23.8% 17.6% 8.9% 37.9% Access to and parking near the 504 Express Bus is paramountto my 0 1 0 0 0 1 happiness.:How often do you walk, 0.0% 00.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% run,or travel with a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair orwa Ike r)on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Commute to the gym:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a 0 0 0 0 1 mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or 0.0% 00.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% walker) on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Dog Walking:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 0 1 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchairorwalker) 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row 6 Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses Dog walking:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 0 0 1 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchair or walker) 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Dog walking :How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 1 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchairorwalker) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Errands Now often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid 0 0 0 0 1 (such as a wheelchair orwalker)on ° 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Go to work:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid 0 0 0 1 0 1 (such as a wheelchairorwalker)on 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Going to daycare:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchairorwalker) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row 7 Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses I don't usde either:Howoftendo you walk, run,or travel with a 0 0 0 0 1 1 mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% walker) on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Kid school drop-off and pickup:How often do you walk, run,ortravel 0 1 0 0 0 1 with a mobility aid (such as a 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% wheelchair or walker)on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Medical appt:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility E1 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchairorwalker) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Mobility aid is white cane :How often do you walk, run,or travel 1 0 0 0 0 1 with a mobility aid (such as a 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% wheelchair or walker)on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row 8 Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses Personal appointments :How often do you walk, run,or travel with a 0 0 1 0 0 1 mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% walker) on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Pick child up from school:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a 1 0 0 0 0 1 mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% walker) on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Qualifications: my walking is not done in the winter months.:How 0 1 0 0 0 1 often do you walk, run,or travel 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% with a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or walker)on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Shopping:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid 0 1 0 0 0 1 (such as a wheelchair or walker)on 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row 9 Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses Take granddaughter for ride in stro Ile r:Howoften do you walk, run, 0 1 0 0 0 1 or travel with a mobility aid (such as 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% a wheelchair or walker)on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row To avoid parking meters:Howoften do you walk, run,ortravel with a 0 0 0 1 0 1 mobility aid (such as a wheelchairor 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% walker) on the streets and sidewalks of Wate rtown fo r e a ch of the following trip types: Count Row To getto shopping area quicker:How often do you walk, run, .1 0 0 0 0 1 or trave I with a mobility aid (such as 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% a wheelchair or walker) on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row To go to my gym :How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 0 1 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchair or walker) 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row 10 Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses I To walk to my car parked far away in the winter b/c of thatterrible 1 0 0 0 0 1 street ban. :How often do you walk, 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% run,or travel with a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or walker)on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row% r Volunteer or religious activities :How often do you walk, run,or 0 1 0 0 0 1 travel with a mobility aid (such as a 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% wheelchair or walker)on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Walk:How often do you walk, run, or travel with a mobility aid (such as 1 0 0 0 0 1 a wheelchair orwalker) on the �100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Walk around victory Field and my ne ig hbo rhoo d. :How ofte n do you �1 0 0 0 0 1 walk, run,or travel with a mobility 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% aid (such as a wheelchair or walker) on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row 11 Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses Walk dog:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid 0 0 0 0 2 (such as a wheelchair orwa Ike r)on 100.0°° 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Walk dog :How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid 1 0 0 0 0 1 (such as a wheelchair or walker)on 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Walk dogs:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid 1 0 0 0 0 1 (such as a wheelchair orwalker)on 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Walk the dog:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchairorwalker) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Walk the dog :How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchairorwalker) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row 12 Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses Walking dog:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 0 1 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchair or walker) 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row% Walking dogs :How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 1 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchair orwalker) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row% Walking my child to and from school:How often do you walk, run, 0 0 1 0 0 1 or travel with a mobility aid (such as 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% a wheelchair or walker) on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row% Walking my dogs:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 1 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchairorwalker) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row% Walking our dog :How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchairorwalker) 00.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row% 13 Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses Walking the dog:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 1 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchair orwa Ike r) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Work:How often do you walk, run, or travel with a mobility aid (such as 0 1 0 0 0 1 awheelchairorwalker) onthe 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row dog walking:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 1 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchairorwalker) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row errands:How often do you walk, run, or travel with a mobility aid (such as 0 1 0 0 0 1 a wheelchair or walker) on the 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row 14 Afew Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses to get so me place close - ie,the Library, post office, local restautant, 0 0 1 0 0 1 etc.:How often do you walk, run,or 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% travel with a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair orwalker)on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row walk dog;get out of house w/stroller for mind health;connect 1 0 0 0 0 1 to off-roadoption:How often do 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or walker) on the streets and sidewalks of Wate rtown fo r e a ch of the following trip types: Count Row walk my dog:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 1 1 0 0 0 2 aid (such as a wheelchair or walker) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row walking dog:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility 1 0 0 0 0 1 aid (such as a wheelchairorwalker) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% on the streets and sidewalks of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row Totals Total Responses 593 15 7. How often do you walk, run, or travel with a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or walker) on off-road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? A Afew Afew few times times times a a a Daily week month year Never Responses Commute to work/school Count 23 31 45 34 429 562 Row% 4.1% 5.5% 8.0% 6.0% 76.3% To get to a bus stop/transit station Count 12 10 32 47 447 548 Row% 2.2% 1.8% 5.8% 8.6% 81.6% Personal trips (Shopping,visiting friends) 6 31 73 62 387 559 Count 1.1% 5.5% 13.1% 11.1% 69.2% Row Recreation/fun Count 17 74 117 112 256 576 Row% 3.0% 12.8% 20.3% 19.4% 44.4% Exercise Count 22 81 115 93 255 566 Row% 3.9% 14.3% 20.3% 16.4% 45.1% Artist/Photographer reasons:How often do you walk, run,or travel with 0 0 1 0 0 1 a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% or walker) on off-road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row Dog walking:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid (such 0 1 0 0 0 1 as a wheelchair or walker) on off- 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row 16 A Afew Afew few times times times a a a Daily week month year Never Responses Dog walking :How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid (such 0 1 0 0 0 1 as a wheelchair orwaIker) onoff- 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row I don't use either:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid 0 0 0 0 1 1 (such as awheelchairorwalker)on 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% off-road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row I don't use ann mobility aid:How often do you walk, run,ortravel with a 0 0 0 0 1 1 mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% walker) on off-road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row Take grandchild for a stroll:How often do you walk, run,or travel with 0 0 1 0 0 1 a mobility aid (such as a wheelchair 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% or walker) on off-road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row To get somewhere faste r.:How ofte n do you walk, run,or travel with a 0 1 0 0 0 1 mobility aid (such as a wheelchair or 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% walker) on off-road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row 17 A Afew Afew few times times times a a a Daily week month year Never Responses Unexpected errands:Howoftendo you walk, run,or travel with a 0 0 17 0 0 1 mobility aid (such as a wheelchairor 0.0% 0.0% 100.0� 0.0% 0.0% walker) on off-road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row Walk dog:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid (such 0 0 1 0 0 1 as a wheelchairorwa Ike r) on off- 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row Walk dogs:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid (such 0 0 1 0 0 1 as a wheelchairorwa Ike r) on off- 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row Walk dogs :How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid (such 0 1 0 0 0 1 as a wheelchairorwalker) on off- 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row Walk the dog:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid 0 1 0 0 0 1 (such as a wheelchair or walker)on 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% off-road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row 18 A Afew Afew few times times times a a a Daily week month year Never Responses Walk the dog :How often do you I walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid 1 0 0 0 0 1 (such as a wheelchair orwa Ike r)on 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% off-road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row dog walking:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid (such 0 0 1 0 0 1 as a wheelchairorwa Ike r) on off- 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row n/a:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid (such as a 0 0 0 0 1 1 wheelchair orwalker) on off-road 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row walk my dog:How often do you walk, run,or travel with a mobility aid (such 0 0 1 0 0 1 as a wheelchair orwalker) on off- 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown? Count Row Totals Total Responses 576 19 8. If conditions improved for walking in Watertown,what trip types would you like to take via walking (or continue/take more of if you already make these trips)?Select all that apply: 80 60 N 40 N 0_ 20 0 Commute to To get to a bus Personal trips Recreation/fun Exercise I would not work/school stop/transit (shopping, walk for these station visiting friends) trips Value Percent Responses Commute to work/school 27.6% 162 To get to a bus stop/transit station 45.4% 266 Personal trips (shopping,visiting friends) . 68.3% 400 Recreation/fun 76.5% 448 Exercise 75.6% 443 1 would not walk for these trips I 7.8% 46 9. Please select the top three pedestrian facilities you would like to see considered in Watertown to improve walking cond itions. Select up to three: 20 5%Other Pedestrian Facility- 10%Curb ramp with detectable Please Specify warning panel 30%Enhanced Street Lighting 16%Accessible Sidewalk - 20%Raised crosswalk 28%Rapid Flashing Beacon 16%Curb Extension 17%Audible push button and 23%Pedestrian Refuge Island signal Value Percent Responses Curb ramp with detectable warning panel 9.6% 53 Accessible Sidewalk I 15.7% 87 Raised crosswalk ' 20.4% 113 Curb Extension 15.6% 86 Pedestrian Refuge Island ' 23.3% 129 Audible push button and signal 17.4% 96 Rapid Flashing Beacon , 27.7% 153 Enhanced Street Lighting 29.8% 165 Other Pedestrian Facility- Please Specify I 4.7% 26 10.What other type of pedestrian facility would you like to see considered in Watertown to improve walking conditions? 21 areas arsenabelmont a real own crosswalks , curbs watertstreet crossing or auburn light sidewalks road cross st wa I k busy pedestrian snow removal main town dangerous 11. Do you bike in Watertown? 24%Yes,regularly 29%No,I am not interested in biking 24%Yes,occasionally 23%No, but I would like Ito 22 Value Percent Responses Yes, regularly 24.1% 145 Yes,occasionally ' 24.4% 147 No, but I would like to ' 22.6% 136 No, I am not interested in biking 28.9% 174 Totals:602 12.Which of the following prevent you from biking in Watertown? Select all that apply: 100 N 2 50 Q) �A \t ` e` e y oQ Sae ° \e '-0 �re�So' e� yro eey `e a Re, oJ�i\� o e o0 5 e �.Q� ,ea ,\°Z`� ,ire �5i o°c� ee�e o°e �� ire eFe o° e` cli o o oJi a� -61 yao 23 Value Percent Responses I have a disability or other health impairment 8.5% 26 There is no place I fee I comfortable locking up my bike when I reach I 9.4% 29 my destination Itwould take me too long to reach my desired destination I 11.7% 36 There are no showers or changing rooms at my work/school/other ' 6.5% 20 destination I need to drive for work I 13.4% 41 1 need to drive to make multiple trips (ex.drop-off children, medical , 15.6% 48 appointment) I don't own a bicycle 24.4% 75 1 am notcomfortable or do not have access to using a bikeshare 6.2% 19 program Iwould bike myself, but do not feel comfortable taking a child on a bike 6.5% 20 with me The streets/paths are poorly maintained ' 29.6% 91 1 often have heavy or bulky items requiring a motor vehicle to transport I 17.6% 54 1 feel unsafe biking on our streets and sidewalks due to motorist , 52.8% 162 behavior I am concerned aboutcrime and/or personal safety 2.9% 9 I'm just not interested in biking r 31.6% 97 13. Copy of Which of the following prevent you from biking in Watertown more? Select all that apply: 24 100 c m c� 50 d e a °� °t °4e 0 o� �\z .tea�. \��o s�°� a`°a r•off° e oa r wage oyQ era, rya 0 r �� c'`• a � 5 �o a ,�.o °� Fe ea'0� Q�° ey' o a`eao a.�G c' Ica°0�e5ti�a�a Q °�a raie °��� `� °w°� {Q i as a& o \0 o° Q° raaee\ 410 aJe Qac �e o°' it o° `� a�o� y`o lb. ar �� GAF o yo° F�goo �e�e \y co �e`F 0 is eye o,z e 5° �o �e ooey a�0\e 0 b zQJ oae eaa \° a�a�e `ec° J��.Q\e area �o Cr �ec�`y e�5a coed o° �� \�e CIOgee\ �,OJ\ o�yy \acc �o 0- o o a`ae a�\e o`ao read NO \ r ae i 0 q5e\\ e�ca ya\ 0 e\J \ J\a �o 25 Value Percent Responses I have a disability or other health impairment 2.8% 8 There is no place I fee I comfortable locking up my bike when I reach I 20.7% 59 my destination Itwould take me too long to reach my desired destination I 16.1% 46 There are no showers or changing rooms at my work/school/other 8.4% 24 destination I need to drive for work I 16.5% 47 1 need to drive to make multiple trips (ex.drop-off children, medical ■ 20.7% 59 appointment) I don't own a bicycle 1.1% 3 1 am notcomfortable or do not have access to using a bikeshare ■ 2.5% 7 program Iwould bike myself, butdo notfeel comfortable taking a child on a bike I 11.2% 32 with me The streets/paths are poorly maintained , 50.2% 143 1 often have heavy or bulky items requiring a motor vehicle to transport I 20.4% 58 1 feel unsafe biking on our streets and sidewalks due to motorist , 57.2% 163 behavior I am concerned aboutcrime and/or personal safety 1.8% 5 None of the above 9.8% 28 14. What do you like most about biking in Watertown?Select up to three: 26 80 60 c N 40 N d 20 0 ■ Good network Good network I am within Residential There are safe I do not bike in Other-Please of on-street of off-road biking distance streets with and Watertown specify bicycle facilities paths of important lower traffic convenient (e.g.bike destinations volumes and facilities on lanes,shared (i.e.errands, speeds major streets lane markings) shopping) Value Percent Responses Good network of on-street bicycle facilities (e.g. bike lanes,shared 16.1% 44 lane markings) Good network of off-road paths ` 49.1% 134 1 am within biking distance of important destinations (i.e.errands, . 63.0% 172 shopping) Residential streets with lower traffic volumes and speeds 40.7% 111 There are safe and conve nie nt facilities on major streets 2.6% 7 1 do not bike in Watertown 1.5% 4 Other- Please specify ■ 8.1% 22 15. Is biking in Watertown safer,the same, or less safe than walking in neighboring towns? 27 12%Safer 32%Less safe 55%The same Value Percent Responses Safer 12.3% 35 The same 55.3% 157 Less safe ■ 32.4% 92 Totals:284 16. Please tell us which neighboring towns you think are safer for biking, and why: 28 infrastructure safer streets bikingstreet cambridg watertown e mt • belmont cars protected I oston roads ' major lane estroarf a nfeel f ic separated designated 17. How often do you bike on the streets of Watertown for each of the following trip types: A few Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses Commute to work/school Count 50 38 46 50 79 263 Row% 19.0% 14.4% 17.5% 19.0% 30.0% To get to a bus stop/transit station Count 7 4 22 27 180 240 Row% 2.9% 1.7% 9.2% 11.3% 75.0% Personal trips (shopping,visiting friends) 15 32 86 96 33 262 Count 5.7% 12.2% 32.8% 36.6% 12.6% Row Recreation/fun Count 15 51 110 75 24 275 Row% 5.5% 18.5% 40.0% 27.3% 8.7% Exercise Count 21 53 92 72 33 271 Row% 7.7% 19.6% 33.9% 26.6% 12.2% 29 A few Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses Commute:How often do you bike on the streets of Watertown fore ach 2 0 0 0 0 2 of the following trip types: 100.0° 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Count Row I always walk my bike on the sidewalk to getto the river.Too 0 0 0 0 1 1 much fast driving onGalen.:How 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% often do you bike on the streets of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row I bike from watertown to other towns,so its a transient pass 0 0 0 1 0 1 throug h:How often do you bike o n 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% the streets of Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row I do all of these much more regularly during the non-winter months!:How 0 0 0 1 0 1 often do you bike on the streets of 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row To get coffee without losing car parking space atwork:How often do 0 0 1 0 0 1 you bike on the streets of 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Watertown for each of the following trip types: Count Row 30 A few Afew times times Afew a a times Daily week month a year Never Responses to get to the off road paths (in the warmer we ather):Howoften do you 0 0 1 0 0 1 bike on the streets of Watertown 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% for each of the following trip types: Count Row Totals Total Responses 275 18. How often do you bike on off-road paths (such as the Charles River Greenway or Community Path) in Watertown for each of the following trip types? 31 A Afew Afew few times times times a a a Daily week month year Never Responses Commute to work/school Count 31 31 48 42 109 261 Row% 11.9% 11.9% 18.4% 16.1% 41.8% To get to a bus stop/transit station Count 5 2 17 25 188 237 Row% 2.1% 0.8% 7.2% 10.5% 79.3% Personal trips (shopping,visiting friends) 8 17 74 76 80 255 Count 3.1% 6.7% 29.0% 29.8% 31.4% Row Recreation/fun Count 10 40 113 83 27 273 Row% 3.7% 14.7% 41.4% 30.4% 9.9% Exercise Count 12 41 104 80 33 270 Row% 4.4% 15.2% 38.5% 29.6% 12.2% Exercise :How often do you bike on off-road paths (such as the Charles 0 1 0 0 0 1 River Greenway or Community Path) in 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Watertown for each of the following trip types? Count Row Totals Total Responses 273 19. If conditions improved for biking in Watertown,what trip types would you like to take via bike (or continue/take more of if you already make these trips)?Select all that apply: 32 80 60 N 40 N 0_ 20 0 Commute to To get to a bus Personal trips Recreation/fun Exercise I would not work/school stop/transit (shopping, bike for these station visiting friends) trips Value Percent Responses Commute to work/school 38.3% 222 To get to a bus stop/transit station 18.6% 108 Personal trips (shopping,visiting friends) 53.1% 308 Recreation/fun 68.4% 397 Exercise ■ 64.5% 374 I would not bike for these trips ' 20.5% 119 20. Please select the top three bicycle facilities you would like to see considered in Watertown to improve biking conditions.Select up to three: 33 3%Other Bicycle Facility-please 4%Shared Lane Markings specify (Sharrow,signage) 15%Bicycle box at intersection `_ \ 10%On-Street Bicycle Lane (marked area for bicyclist to wait for signal to change) 30%On-street buffered bicycle 13%bicycle signal lane 44%Off-Street Shared use path 37%Separated bicycle lane(curb separated at sidewalk level) Value Percent Responses Shared Lane Markings (Sharrow,signage) 4.0% 20 On-Street Bicycle Lane I 10.0% 50 On-street buffered bicycle lane ' 30.1% 150 Separated bicycle lane (curb separated atsidewalk level) 37.1% 185 Off-Street Shared use path ' 44.3% 221 bicycle signal I 12.8% 64 Bicycle box at intersection(marked area for bicyclistto waitfor signal 14.6% 73 to change) Other Bicycle Facility- please specify 2.6% 13 21.What other type of bicycle facility would you like to see considered in Watertown to improve biking conditions? No data: No responses found for this question. 34 22. How do you typically get to off-road paths in Watertown? 1%Other-Please specify: 17%1 do not use off-road paths in Watertown 1%Take a Bus 39%Walk, run or use a mobility 0%Rideshare or Taxi(i.e. Uber, aid(e.g.a wheelchair) Lyft) 11%Drive or carpool(private vehicle) 0%Bikeshare 32%Personal Bike Value Percent Responses Walk, run or use a mobility aid (e.g.a wheelchair) , 38.9% 223 Personal Bike ' 32.1% 184 Bikeshare 0.3% 2 Drive or carpool (private vehicle) 10.5% 60 Rideshare or Taxi(i.e. Uber, Lyft) 0.2% 1 Take a Bus 0.5% 3 1 do not use off-road paths in Watertown 16.6% 95 Other- Please specify: Mild 1.0% 6 TotaIs:574 23. Please rate on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 =very important, 5 = not important) how important you think good walking and bicycling access is to each of the following destinations or groups of destinations: 35 4 - 2 - somewhat 1-very somewhat 3 - not 5- not important important neutral important important Responses Schools Count 426 69 44 6 27 572 Row% 74.5% 12.1% 7.7% 1.0% 4.7% Senior housing Count 239 115 117 31 65 567 Row% 42.2% 20.3% 20.6% 5.5% 11.5% Residential neighborhoods 351 133 48 9 28 569 Count 61.7% 23.4% 8.4% 1.6% 4.9% Row Watertown Library Count 359 114 55 12 31 571 Row% 62.9% 20.0% 9.6% 2.1% 5.4% Commercial centers (Watertown Square, 371 124 41 10 26 572 Coolidge Square) 64.9% 21.7% 7.2% 1.7% 4.5% Count Row Commercial/industrial areas (Arsenal Street, 293 159 58 20 36 566 Watertown Mall, 51.8% 28.1% 10.2% 3.5% 6.4% Arsenal Yards) Count Row Local Parks/recreational 407 112 23 5 23 570 areas 71.4% 19.6% 4.0% 0.9% 4.0% Count Row G re e nways/off-road paths 413 91 41 4 21 570 Coun' 72.5% 16.0% 7.2% 0.7% 3.7% Row Bus stops and nearby commuter rail stations 330 115 72 16 31 564 Count 58.5% 20.4% 12.8% 2.8% 5.5% Row 36 4 - 2 - somewhat 1-very somewhat 3 - not 5- not important important neutral important important Responses Totals Total Responses 572 24. If you have children, do they walk or bike to school? 15%Yes 18%No 68%1 do not have children / Value Percent Responses Yes 14.5% 83 No 17.6% 101 Ido not have children 67.9% 389 Tota Is:573 25.What are the primary reasons they do not walk or bike to school? 37 50 40 30 N U N 20 10 0 Live too far Concerns Concerns over Concerns My child is not My child is not Other-Please away about motorist about old enough or interested specify: "stranger behavior condition of skilled enough danger' sidewalks yet between home and school Value Percent Responses Live too far away 31.0% 31 Concerns about"stranger danger" I 18.0% 18 Concerns over motorist behavior ' 43.0% 43 Concerns about condition of sidewalks between home and school 27.0% 27 My child is notold enough or skilled enough yet ' 39.0% 39 My child is not inte rested I 12.0% 12 Other- Please specify: 14.0% 14 26. If the Town could do THREE things to encourage you to walk and/or bike more in Watertown,what would you want the Town to do?Select T hree 38 100 �\U2r 50 }oy \mac° aQ�` Q�, \��coU° °QQ p a oy °°w mac �� ;� a°o J<° °� �\o °°� �o <0 y� Q<o°' �v °ow c +��o�,� ° .a lS o ���� a�ol Sic qj <° @ ,�, `�'`� QJ� oaQy<oa Jo�a o y Q j Q<° ° Qe G •U� JU l° lCQ 39 Value Percent Responses Provide maps and signs to local amenities and services 2.1% 12 Improve/increase amenities such as benches,tables,waterfountains I 9.4% 54 Increase shade coverage (e.g.,streettrees,transit shelters) I 14.1% 81 Improve maintenance of streets and sidewalks (cracks, potholes) , 53.7% 309 Improve snow removal on sidewalks and paths ' 39.0% 224 Build more sidewalks 8.2% 47 Improve or add streetand pedestrian-scale lighting 12.0% 69 Provide nicer landscaping ■ 4.5% 26 Improve bicycle parking (e.g., more bike racks,covered racks,secure I 8.5% 49 bicycle cages) Provide car parking at off-road path access points 6.1% 35 Constructsaferstreetcrossings ■ 23.7% 136 Install public restrooms ■ 7.0% 40 Install emergency call boxes ■ 2.1% 12 Construct more/safer on-street bicycle lanes ■ 33.0% 190 Construct more off-road paths ■ 24.9% 143 Decrease vehicle speeds ■ 13.6% 78 Provide bicyclist education programs/materials 2.1% 12 Increase traffic law enforcement I 16.0% 92 Expand bikeshare and/or scooter share programs 4.3% 25 Not Applicable 3.0% 17 27. How are you associated with the Town? 40 100 80 60 U i N 0_ 40 20 0 Resident Employee (work in Student Visitor(recreation, Other-Please Watertown) shopping,visit specify: friends/family) Value Percent Responses Resident 92.3% 528 Employee (work in Watertown) I 12.6% 72 Student 0.3% 2 Visitor(recreation,shopping,visit frie nds/family) 72 3.1% 18 Other- Please specify: 1.0% 6 28.What is your age? 41 1%80+ 1 0%Under18 years I 5%18-29 years 21%65-79 years 46%30-49 years 27%50-64 years Value Percent Responses Under 18 years 0.2% 1 18-29 years I 4.9% 28 30-49 years 46.1% 262 50-64 years 26.6% 151 65-79 years , 20.8% 118 80+ 1.4% 8 Totals:568 29.What is your gender identity? 42 1%Another Gender-Please specify: 41%Male o 59/o Female Value Percent Responses Female 58.6% 332 Male . 40.9% 232 Another Gender- Please specify: 0.5% 3 Tota Is:567 30.To receive project updates, please include your email address:This survey is confidential and email addresses will be used for notification purposes only. 31.Additional comments: Please let us know if there is something we have missed, and if there are any particular locations for walking or biking that concern you. 43 path arsenalpaths river Streets sidewalks road biking S t mt cars watertownlanes walk St ore g traffic :) i {e pedestrian a s uare roads dangerous 44 Appendix B = 4: ,.,.` Public Meeting #2 �` This is a project of: 1630 Department of Community Development and Planning Watertown Department of Public Works Engineering Division BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee Watertown Bicycle : Pedestrian ' • Virtual Public Meeting �0111111 .11111111111116 M Monday, December 7, 2020 Joint Meeting of the Town Council Economic Development & Planning Commitee and Public Works Committee 7:00 PM Watertown encourages active transportation—walking, biking and transit—to help reduce congestion, and improve both air quality and public health. The Watertown Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan aims to help achieve those goals by identifying future improvements to the Town's streets and walkways. Join us fordiscussion of draft plan. Elk 9M CableThe meeting will be televised through WCATV (Watertown https://wcatv.org/government-channel Public may join the virtual . . https://watertown-ma.zoom.us/j/92240552427 Public may join the virtual meeting audio . HOW DO I LEARN MORE . ` PREVIEW THE PLAN! \ ® httas://www.watertown-ma.aov/957/ Read the Plan: Bicvcle-Pedestrian-Plan nina-2019-2020 htti)s://www.watertown-ma.aov/957/ O Laura Wiener d Senior Transportation Planner Bicvcle-Pedestrian-Plannina-2019-2020 (617) 972-6417 StoryMap Overview: PQ Iwiener@watertown-ma.gov htta://tinv.cc/WatertownBikeWaIk TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS & PLANNERS CF-McMAHON McMahon AssohFates 120 Water Street, 4 Floor Boston, MA 02109 P. 617.556.0020 mcmahonassociates.com January 15, 2021 Laura Wiener Senior Transportation Planner Watertown Planning and Community Development Iwiener(a?watertown-ma.gov RE: Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Public Comment Summary Comments regarding the Draft Final Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, October 2020 (Plan), were submitted through several channels.A public meeting was held to review the Plan and solicit feedback.A joint meeting of the Town Council Economic Development& Planning Committee and Public Works Committee was held on Monday, December 7, 2020. A tour of the StoryMap detailing the Plan was shown,followed by a general question and answer session with the Town Council Committee. Feedback from the December 7 meeting was generally favorable: • Several councilors praised the Plan for its depth and comprehensiveness, as well as its helpful use of graphics and maps to illustrate network gaps and opportunities for connection. • Some councilors also appreciated the Plan's focus on improving safety for all users and its intensive incorporation of public input. • Both councilors and members of the public at the meeting indicated they thought the Plan was essential to creating a culture change around transportation in Watertown. • Some commenters felt that the Plan could build on the momentum created by economic development along Arsenal Street and the increase in active transportation resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic,to make Watertown a more vibrant, walkable community. The StoryMap summarizing the Plan was available through January 11, 2021 (extended one week at the request of December 7 meeting participants).A summary of the comments on the StoryMap and the list of comments submitted by email are provided at the end of this document. • The StoryMap was viewed by 55 unique users during the comment period,for a total of 75 sessions and 87 pageviews. • The content was available for both mobile and desktop users—89%of users accessed the site through a desktop, while 11% used a mobile phone or tablet. • The StoryMap included a comment form where users could record their thoughts on the Plan. o Nine comments were submitted via the StoryMap. o Three people submitted comments to the Town via email. Several of the comments on the StoryMap echoed the support for the Plan shown at the Town Council Committee meeting. Commenters specifically praised the effort and thought given to pedestrian safety, and also the potential to improve the cycling and walking culture in Watertown. StoryMap comments and emails also raised some additional issues for consideration as implementation of the Plan moves forward: Engineering I Planning I Design I Technology Transportation Solutions Building Better Communities Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan—Public Comment Summary January 15, 2021 Page 2 of 4 • The most prominent of the issues cited was the need for snow removal. o Some were enthusiastic about the snow removal goals detailed in the Plan, while others stressed the importance of meeting these goals or demonstrated concern regarding their feasibility. o A concern was raised that snow reduces visibility of pavement markings, creating a safety concern for bicyclists as well as vehicle operators and pedestrians, and so additional signage or indicators of bicycle facilities would be needed. • Multiple commenters cited motor vehicle speed as a major impediment to safety. Several tactics mentioned in the Plan were supported to address this problem, including lowering speed limits, increased enforcement,traffic calming techniques and speed feedback signs. • Safety was cited by several commenters as an important consideration in changing the culture to be more favorable to walking and biking and to making Watertown more vibrant. Some commenters referenced bicycle etiquette,voicing concerns that some bicyclists do not use facilities appropriately, and need to wear more safety gear, including lights and helmets. • A commenter suggested that food access should be added to the list of priority locations for how bicycle and pedestrian projects are prioritized. It was noted that many grocery stores are not designed with cyclists and pedestrians in mind,yet for some people,this is their only form of transportation to access a food source. • It was suggested by one commenter that greater emphasis should be placed on how the Plan supports efforts to address climate change by encouraging more bicycling and walking. Watertown Town Council Resolution 2019-R-2 for renewable energy was specifically referenced. • Several commenters mentioned specific locations for further consideration: o On Main Street, prohibit cars from entering the library parking lot, as it creates conflict with the bike lane. o The intersection of Spring Street and Summer Street should be a focus for safety improvements. o On Mt. Auburn Street the benefits of curb extensions and pedestrian refuge islands were questioned. o Bicycle parking should be added at MBTA stops and schools. Overall, members of the public were able to use the numerous feedback opportunities and channels provided to record their thoughts on the Plan, with comments coming from the Town Council meeting,the online StoryMap, and via e-mail.These comments reflected a high level of interest and overall support for the Plan, notably from Town Councilors.The feedback raising concerns emphasizes the need to follow through on goals mentioned in the Plan.As such, while this Memo will be added to the report, no revisions are recommended to the Plan. Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan-Public Comment Summary January 15, 2021 Page 3 of 4 Watertown Bicycle &Pedestrian Plan - StoryMap Comments General Comments Every winter snowplows destroy the handicap ramps at crosswalks and intersections. I would think it is very costly and the plowers should be held accountable. On another note,I don't know what involvement the police have had,but running lights,beeping horns, and distracted driving are like the accepted way to drive now and I don't see much enforcement. to repair them every year, and seems unnecessary. Plows should be held accountable for what they destroy. Great plan,just want to stress the importance of path etiquette,I have been hit by a family of 3 bicyclists! It helps if they say "behind you"! Rather than do to pedestrians,what motorists do to them! PLEASE remove the word "encouraging" regarding lowering speed limits in the Safety Policy Recommendation B and make the straightforward recommendation that the town include lower speed limits as an acceptable and recommended tool. This plan effectively makes the case for improving safety and relieving stress. Speed is by far the most important contributor to safety and lowering speed limits has been an approach embraced by most of the surrounding town. Lower speeds also make neighborhoods more livable and the town should embrace this goal for reasons beyond just bicycle safety. B Develop ... Target specific areas in Watertown where strategies to meet this goal include encouraging lower speed limits,traffic calming,intersection safety improvements, and enforcement particularly in areas of high crash incidents as reported through the incidents as reported through the MassDOT Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). I'm very enthusiastic about this plan! One thing that I've noticed in the last week since it's snowed is that sidewalks are consistently under-shoveled/-plowed,making access difficult for pedestrians and especially those with disabilities. Therefore, I very much support the recommendation for establishing snow clearance procedures! I would like to submit a 13 page document of comments on the Bicycle &Pedestrian Plan Report. To whom should I submit it? I would like to see every bike have a flashing red light at the front& rear of a bike &a bright light at front or tire lights. Bikers need to be well seen from the front&back of their bike. I believe it's a Mass law to wear a helmet. Is this law enforced? I see kids&people not wearing helmets or following the biking rules. Safety for both the biker& auto driver are key! You should not allow cars to enter the Library parking lot from Main St. -They should enter via to Sonny Whooley Way. The new bike lane behind the library is creating an accident waiting to happen. We need to put license plates on bicycles. Too many drive erratically, and are a danger on the roadway. There is no accountability for the cyclists, and they drive accordingly. Watertown Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan-Public Comment Summary January 15, 2021 Page 4 of 4 Thank you for all the effort put into developing this thoughtful plan. I would like to be sure that the Town's maintenance procedures and priorities live up to the promise of this plan. For example,Public Works needs a clear standard operating procedure that ensures that Town-owned sidewalks, as well as all crosswalks and curb cuts on Town-owned property, are cleared of snow with the same urgency as car routes are cleared. We also need to be sure we're focusing on Complete Streets with every capital and major maintenance project.I understand that Watertown has signed on to Complete Streets;let's ensure that that means something significant. Again,thank you for all your hard work to date. Email comments were received from the following: • Deborah Peterson,Watertown Faces Climate Change,December 12, 2020 • Peter Barzdines,Watertown resident,January 10,2021 • Allie Wainer, graduate student, Tufts Department of Urban and Environmental Policy,January 13, 2021 Watertown Town Council Committee on Public Works Councilor Piccirilli,Chair, Councilor Donato,Vice Chair, Councilor Palomba, Secretary And Economic Development and Planning Councilor Woodland,Chair, Councilor Feltner,Vice Chair,Councilor Piccirilli,Secretary Committee Report Monday, December 7, 2020, 7:00 PM The meeting, in accordance with the Governor's Order Suspending Certain Provisions of the Open Meeting Law relating to the 2020 COVID-19 emergency, was conducted by Zoom and televised live by Watertown Community Access Television (WCATV). In addition,the agenda provided the public with notice of how to access the meeting online and by telephone, and that comments were invited via email. The purpose of the meeting was to consider the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Report. Attending the meeting were all the members of the two Committees as well as Councilors Kounelis and Gannon, Steve McGoon,Assistant Town Manager and Director of the Department of Community Development and Planning(DCDP), Laura Wiener,Transportation Planner from DCDP, Matt Shuman,Town Engineer at Department of Public Works, Watertown TMA Director Sophia Galimore, members of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee Andy Campagna,Janet Jameson, Sheila Fay, Amy Plovnick and Maria Saiz, Watertown Faces Climate Change member Deborah Peterson, Environment and Energy Efficiency Committee members Meredith Fields and Jeanne Trubek, Members of McMann Associates Natalie Raffol, Christi Apicella and Michael Pompili, Eric Weis from Cogent, Kate Winn from the Westwood Pedestrian and Bike Committee, and Watertown residents including Cindy Wentz,Jill Allen Dixon, Cathy Peary, Colleen Tracy, and Andreas Aeppli. Councilor Piccirilli requested that Councilor Woodland chair the meeting. Ms. Wiener provided a brief background to the new Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Report,which is available at https://www.watertown-ma.eov/DocumentCenter/View/30228/Watertown-Bike-Ped-Plan-Final-Draft- October-2020. She noted that it was a recommendation in the Comprehensive Plan of 2015 that the existing Bicycle and Transportation Plan be revised. The yearlong effort to do this was a collaboration of McMahon Associates, Cogent,the Department of Public Works,the Department of Community Development and Planning, and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee. She noted that the vision of the working group was to improve walking and bicycling in Watertown for recreation purposes and for traveling to school and work. Walking and biking helps to reduce congestions and air population and improves public health. Ms. Wiener introduced Christi Apicella from McMahon Associates who walked the group through a story map,which is also available at https://storvmaps.arcgis.com/stories/cOdbbO5498al4f9f841cal28051b56d5. She explained that the story map might be considered an executive summary and encouraged those attending take the time to walk through the story map and to submit comments that will be collected until January 4, 2021. Some of the key points from the story map included the following. 1) The Plan was created to serve as a planning and policy document to guide future decision- making. -2- 2) Watertown is already doing pretty well when it comes to people finding alternatives to driving alone. Many are taking public transit and car-pooling while a small number are walking and biking. 3) There is a real opportunity to increase biking and walking since 20%of Watertown workers live here. 4) There is a commitment to plan for everyone—from a schoolchild to seniors,those who use a mobility devise, and for those with different levels of biking skills and comfort. 5) Public engagement was critical to creating a Plan like this and it included a public meeting in January and a survey that was online for a month. Over 800 people completed the survey. 6) Planners learned about how people were getting around,the challenges for biking and walking, motorists' behavior, and places people would like to go if it was safe to get there. 7) Also looked as existing data—crash data (degree of injury), sidewalk data (poor to good), and the Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (BLTS),that is the amount of stress a biker would experience on different roadways. 8) Team was able to come up with BLTS for each roadway in Town. There are a large number of roadways that have a low BLTS, but the major roads, particularly those that provide north-south travel, are higher stress environments with a high BLTS level. 9) Based on the information gathered and the data it was possible to come up a vision statement and four goals-safety, connectivity, cultural and vibrancy. Each goal has measures of effectiveness to determine if recommended practices, policies, and infrastructure plans to achieve the goals were effective. 10) Each recommendations had an associated timeline (short-term, medium-term, and long-term) as well as cost for implementation from low to medium to high. We moved to comments and questions from the councilors and members of the public. Here is a selected list of those. 1) Liked that the plan recognized that not ever goal could be implemented on every street. In addition, the cultural goal may be the most challenging. 2) Appreciated the efforts made to gather community input. Is it possible to extend the comment period given the holiday season? Yes,we can extend it from January 4 to January 11. 3) The plan is comprehensive and forward looking and presented in a logical and easy to understand framework. Particularly liked that the Plan was presented as away to fill the gaps in existing facilities. 4) Putting safety first for all users of our roads will resonate with many residents even those who are not fans of biking. 5) Pedestrian issues raised in the Plan are well thought out. I hope we will get back to the snow removal issues that is mentioned in the Plan 6) COVID has increased the number of cyclists and walkers and maybe there is a way to build on this reality to address the cultural goal. 7) Would it be possible to take a closer look at the Spring Street and Summer Street intersection, which the data shows as one of the hot stops in Town. It is a school walking route, it is near a retirement community, and the lighting is very poor. The authors may have some good ideas of how to address this holistically. -3- 8) Appreciated the focus on pedestrian aspects in Plan particularly the recommendations on safer intersections and safer pedestrian crossings. I want to highlight the issue of snow removal and the problems caused by homeowners who are not required to remove snow. 9) The implementation of the Plan may require ordinances, use of capital funds, and negotiation with the state. A residential snow-shoveling ordinance would mostly like be a referral to the Public Works Committee and the Rules and Ordinance Committee. 10) The Plan is a policy document that gives the staff guidance to develop policies that would still have to go through an approval process. 11) There was a suggestion that the Joint Committees do not recommend that the full Town Council accept the Plan until after the deadline for input from the community. 12) Speaking on behalf of her district, Councilor Feltner noted that there was not a north-south connection from District B/Watertown Square to the River or other north-south connections. 13) There was no mention of the Police Department and the Traffic Commission in the Plan. Is there any unique role for these entities? Yes,they would be involved depending on the implementation of certain recommendations. 14) There could be funding available for active transportation from state and federal sources and having a Plan in place will put the Town in a good position to apply for these funds. 15) The Plan was specifically designed to have the recommendations be very detailed for policy and infrastructure implementation while the action plan section has a condensed version of the recommendations with timeframes and associated costs. 16) Kudos to Laura for reflecting the Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee's feedback and comments and appreciation to the consultants who were always open to the Committee's suggestions for additions and improvements to the Plan. Councilor Feltner made the motion the Joint Committee continue this meeting and reconvene in January after the final comments and suggestions are summarized by the staff following the comment deadline of January 11. Councilor Piccirilli seconded the motion and the motion passed 5- 0. The meeting adjourned at 8:17 PM. Minutes were prepared by Councilor Palomba. Appendix C: A��" Existing Policies �` (9) Watertown Appendix C BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Existing Policies Appendix C - Summary of Current Watertown Regulations, Policies, and Plans The following appendix provides a summary of regulations, policies, and plans that effect bicycle and pedestrian planning in Watertown.These documents were reviewed to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the existing policies in place, what they recommend and require for bicycle and pedestrian facilities and access, and how they can support and integrate with the recommendations of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.The reviewed documents also provide an understanding of how policies for parking, site design, and reducing vehicular trips support walking and biking, both in terms of infrastructure and culture.The full language of each document can be found online, with the summaries are provided for purpose of documenting key points as they relate to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. Watertown Business District Snow/Ice Removal Ordinance—Section 96.26 Requires business owners to clear sidewalks within 2 hours at the end of a storm, or by beginning of following business day. If not, subject to fine of$100 first offence, $200 second offense, $300 third offense.' Example Snow Removal Ordinances—Neighboring Communities City of Newton—City ordinance extends to "every owner or occupant of a building or lot of land abutting a paved sidewalk or any person having charge of such property shall use reasonable efforts to remove snow and ice from the sidewalk and handicap access ramps, and shall use reasonable efforts to treat said sidewalk ramps to allow for safe passageway of approximately thirty-six(36) inches in width...within 24 hours after such snow has ceased to fall or such ice has formed." 2 City of Somerville—Applies a fine for residents not removing snow: Single-, two-, or three-family dwellings, 1st offense: $100.00, 2nd offense: $200.00, 3rd and subsequent offense: $300.00. Four or more dwelling units or commercial establishments: 1st offense: $150.00, 2nd and subsequent offense: $300.00.3 Cambridge—Requires residents and businesses to remove ice within 6 hours and snow within 12 hours. Failure to comply results in a $50/day fine for each day of non-compliance. htti3://librarv.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dII/Massachusetts/watertown ma/citvofthetownofwatertownmassachusettscod?f=te mplates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:watertown ma z htti)://www.newtonma.aov/civicax/filebank/documents/45835 3 htti3s://librarv.municode.com/ma/somerviIle/codes/code of ordinances?nodeld=PTIICOOR CH12STSIOTPUPL ARTIINGE S12- 8SNICSI (9) Watertown Appendix C BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Existing Policies Watertown Massachusetts Design Guidelines (2015)4 • Provision for reduced parking requirements—investigate shared parking with adjacent property owners when multiple, abutting sites are being developed. Identify possible overlapping parking needs within site when calculating minimum requirements • Design adequate space to allow for snow storage/removal • Non-vehicular access should be given equal priority to cars and the site design/circulation should reflect this. Bicycle access includes a combination of bike lanes, cycle tracks, bike racks, and bike storage. Pedestrian access includes bulb outs, adequately wide sidewalks, street trees, lighting, seating, open space connections, and public spaces to encourage walking. Public transit access includes exploring additional bus stop locations, shared shuttle services, and car sharing programs to encourage alternate modes of transportation. Town of Watertown Zoning Ordinance(2018)5 • Section 5.09 Watertown Square Design Overlay District o Purpose to regulate building signage and facade alternations o Encourage reinvestment, improve appearance of Watertown Square o Parking requirements same as central business district • Section 5.12 Arsenal Overlay Development District(AODD) o By special permit,the planning board may reduce number of otherwise required number of off-street accessory parking spaces, based on availability of public transportation alternatives,TDM programs, ability of uses with peak user demands at different times to share parking spaces or other factors for which applicant provides parking study or analysis. o One bicycle parking space for every 20 automobile spaces. o Where more than 10 bicycle spaces are required, half shall be provided as long term (employee) parking, secure and protected from the elements. Other half as short term (customer or visitor) parking,visible and convenient to building entrance. o Bicycle lockers and showers, shall be negotiated during the developer marking and selection phases in order to meet provisions of TDM Plan. o A centralized bicycle facility which includes all of the above provisions is highly desirable. • 5.16 Pleasant St Corridor District (PSCD) o Reductions in required parking granted by special permit in accordance with section 6.01, Shared Parking, and Section 5.16 Alternative Transportation Incentives, of which the total reduction shall not exceed 25%of the required amount. o High density quality development o Maintain streetscape continuity o Size and detail of buildings pedestrian oriented and incorporate features of visual interest 4 httos://www.watertown-ma.aov/DocumentCenter/View/17130/2015-Watertown-Design-Guidelines-Book-Adooted?bidld= s https://www.watertown-ma.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3364/ZONING-ORDINANCE--Amended- 12112018?bidld= 2 Watertown Appendix C BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Existing Policies o Distinct "sidewalk" presence with incorporation of elements such as planters,traditional awnings, signage to enhance pedestrian scale and interest of street o A development that provides significant contribution to improve, extend, and/or provide both visual and physical connections to the Charles River bike path may receive increases to maximum allowable building coverage, FAR, and/or height o Developments providing required parking spaces underground or within structure may receive increases to max allowable building coverage, FAR and/or height. o Developments that encourage use of alternative modes of transportation shall be eligible to receive reduction of required amount of automobile parking spaces. Credit maybe achieved by demonstrating reduced demand for parking by encouragement of cycling, walking, car sharing, and use of public transit. Possible measures: showers for bike commuting employees, sheltered bicycle parking, providing connections to public transit, on-site car sharing, participation in TMA or shuttle/transit service, providing infrastructure for bus stops onsite. In no case shall parking reduction exceed 25%. • 5.18 Regional Mixed Use District (RMUD) (eastern Arsenal Street) o Allows for greater density in terms of height and massing o Reduced parking space requirements to reduce traffic congestion and improve multi-use transit services in compliance with TDM policy o High quality public realm (via Watertown Design Guidelines), pedestrian environment, implement Complete Streets, promote frontages that create connections to surrounding neighborhoods and the Charles River o Promotes connecting to and integrating with adjacent state, municipal, and privately owned parcels o Development that accommodates and promotes multi-modal access,transit between Arsenal corridor and mass transit stops, and TDM measures to reduce automobile use o Development of housing options that support residents within walking or cycling distance to employment and leisure uses o Parking offered to residents as a fee based option distinct from rent charges. Smart parking technology required for projects with structured parking over 100 spaces o Master Plan special permit—the SPGA may reduce the number of required parking spaces, based on availability of public transportation alternatives,TDM projects implemented, compatibility with any transportation policy adopted by town, ability of uses with peak user demands at different times to share parking spaces or other factors o Special attention to infrastructure and design that will create direct public bicycle and pedestrian path connections with adjacent pubic bicycle or pedestrian paths, and that minimizes barriers separating such paths o When appropriate, conceptual wayfinding signage proposal for paths, access to parks, and transit • Article VI: Automotive and Bicycle Parking Requirements o (b) Parking minimums outline by use 3 Watertown Appendix C BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Existing Policies (e)The aggregate number of spaces required for each of several uses separately may be provided on a common parking lot serving all of these uses. Projects in close proximity to one another are encouraged to provide shared parking plans that meet the individual requirements per§ 6.01(b) across multiple properties by special permit. Developers are also encouraged to "unbundle" parking by separating the cost of parking from the cost of ownership or rental. (f) Where it can be demonstrated that the combined peak parking needs of all the uses sharing the lot will, because of differences in peak hours or days, be less than required by§6.01(b), the number of parking spaces to be provided may be reduced accordingly by Special Permit. Developments that encourage the use of alternate modes of transportation may be eligible to receive a reduction of the required amount of automobile parking spaces by Special Permit.This credit may be achieved by demonstrating a reduced demand for automobile parking by the encouragement of cycling, walking, car sharing, and use of public transit.The reduced parking requirement shall correspond to the reduced automobile parking demand, but in no case shall exceed 25%. o 6.07 Bike Parking (a) Off-street bike parking shall be provided as follows: ■ One bicycle space for every 15 automobile parking spaces in commercial/office mixed use developments and one bicycle space for every 5 auto spaces in residential/mixed use developments, a minimum of 6. ■ Each space must accommodate a bicycle 7' long by 2'wide. Inverted U or Ring and Post style ■ Recommended that half be provided as long term parking, safe and secure. Other half has short term (customer or visitor) parking. Space be visible and convenient to building entrance. ■ Any property owner required to have bicycle parking may elect to establish a shared bicycle parking facility with any other property owner within the same block to meet the combined requirements. • Section 9.03 Site Plan Review Submission Check List6 o Parking: Requires parking analysis for automobile, bicycle, car share, electric car. o Circulation: Special attention shall be given to traffic circulation, parking areas and access points to public streets and community facilities in order to maximize convenience and safety of vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets. Special consideration shall be given to infrastructure and design that will enhance public transit, such as bus shelters, on-site transportation demand management measures, and participation in a Transit Management Association." 6 httr)s://www.ci.watertown.ma.us/870/PlanninF--Zonin. 4 (9) Watertown Appendix C BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Existing Policies Watertown Parking Management Plan? • Participants of survey for plan want to improve walking and biking environment, prefer to park off-street. Willing to park once and walk between destinations. • Parking requirements are barrier to new businesses, zoning regulations require parking, many lots are vacant even in peak hour, zoning requirements for shared sparking discourage its use, parking funds not reinvested in commercial areas. • Consider changes to zoning to encourage new businesses to reduce or eliminate parking requirements, allow developers to pay fee in lieu of parking, create parking benefit district, establish mechanism to regularly review regulations and monitor parking changes. • Need for pedestrian paths, bike facilities and lighting in municipal lots, and better circulation from lots to businesses • Recommendations: o Improve wayfinding and signage o Work with private owners to promote shared parking o Reduce overall parking demand by enhancing access for non-vehicles. o Adjust parking and zoning standards to encourage investment in squares Watertown TDM Regulations (2019)$ • The Town's goal is to aid town-wide reduction of the SOV mode by 20%over baseline data for residents and employees (US Census Bureau,American Community Survey, 2000-2010), which identifies that Watertown residents currently have a SOV mode share of 68%and that Watertown workers have a SOV mode share of 75%,The goal, therefore, is a residential SOV mode share of no more than 54%and a Worker SOV mode share of no more than 60%. • TDM ordinance establishes legal authority to ensure compliance with the provisions of this set of regulations through permitting, inspections monitoring, and enforcement. • Basic TDM Plan: maintain 3 TDM measures to support goals o Includes residential uses of 10-39 units and commercial/industrial uses of 10- 30,000 SF, <30 FTE emp, >10,000 SF<6 FTE—100 ADT o Site plan review with >150 ADT and/or 15 peak hour trips o May be audited by Town at discretion of director of DCDP • Comprehensive TDM Plan: Establish program goals,targets and measures for trip reduction based on project's proposed use, new trips generated, baseline transportation impacts. Measure must add up to at least 14 points. o Includes retail uses 30,000 SF or>30 FTE, residential uses 40+ units, mixed use uses that meets/exceed retail or res req., office uses 10,000 SF, >6 FTE or 100 ADT, industrial uses 30,000 SF or 30 FTE or more 7 httr)s://www.watertown-ma.gov/DocumentCenter/View/27911/Parking-Management-Plan-Executive-Summarv- and-Strategies s https://www.watertown-ma.gov/DocumentCenter/View/28504/TDM-Regulations final-10-25-19 5 Watertown Appendix C BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Existing Policies o Identify baseline numbers for trips, parking generation o Sample measures: ■ Unbundle parking, parking cashout, carshare parking ■ Improve walking conditions—paths, streetscape improvements ■ Bike parking 1.5 times zoning requirement, showers/lockers, bike share membership, host bike share, bike repair station,fleet of bikes, bike equipment ■ Shuttle services,TMA, provide benches/shelters at stops,TOD ■ Wayfinding signage, real time displays ■ Marketing,flexible work schedule, employee incentive programs o Identify targets to reduce SOV mode share o Shall include monitoring program for life of site plan review or SPA. Additional measures may be needed if SOV use remains above Town's mode share goal. fth Appendix D: � `��!,a " Micromobility (9) Watertown Appendix D BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Micromobility Appendix D - Micromobility SCOOTER 101 What is a scooter? • Massachusetts law is currently undergoing changes to differentiate types of scooters and micro- mobility options.These can be private or shared and manual or motorized. Some terms to know include: o Motorized scooter/E-Scooter: Under current law these are defined as any 2-3 wheeled device with handlebars and either a seat or standing platform powered by an electric or gas motor with or without the assistance of human propulsion. o E-foot scooters: Language used in a bill that would allow for electric foot scooters to be parked on the sidewalk not impeding the normal flow of pedestrian traffic. Otherwise they follow the same definition and operating requirements as motorized/e-scooters. o Lightweight motorized scooters/personal micro-mobility device: Another bill proposes using these terms to limit the use of motorized/e-scooters with a weight of 50 pounds or less to speeds of 15 MPH or less and allow them on recreational bicycle paths and sidewalks outside of business districts. Otherwise they follow the same definition and operating requirements as motorized/e-scooters. Operators of lightweight motorized scooters on the sidewalk are to yield to pedestrians and give an audible signal before passing. The development of these bills illustrates a need to differentiate the emerging types of motorized/e-scooters that have different operational needs than a more traditional, larger, scooters. 7 oil9 Smaller stand up e-scooters are increasingly popular with dockless share companies providing them in cities and Motorized scooters resembling vespas or towns throughout the country.This type of motorcycles are larger and likely to be e-scooter is more likely to be ridden in a ridden on streets at speeds up to 30 MPH.They can be electric or gas fueled. bike lane or on the sidewalk 1 (9) Watertown Appendix D BICYCLE&PEDESTRIAN PLAN Micromobility Who, Where, How, and When can motorized/e-scooters operate in Massachusetts? • Who: Anyone with a valid driver's license or learner's permit • Where: On all public ways with the exception of limited access or state highways. Operators of motorized/e-scooters must stay to the right at all times, including when passing a vehicle. • How:A motorized/e-scooter must have operational stop and turn signals so that the operator can keep both hands on the handlebars at all times.They must be operated at no faster than 20 MPH. It is encouraged that operators where protective headgear. Motorized/e-scooters are not registered with the RMV. • When: Only between sunrise and sunset Where can motorized/e-scooters operate in other locations? Location Area of Operation Brookline Streets Bike lanes Multi-use paths Prohibited on sidewalks Speed capped at 15 MPH Washington DC Streets Bicycle lanes Sidewalk, except for in the CBD Providence Streets Sidewalk (Note: Scooter share companies are required to move or retrieve poorly parked scooters within 24 hours) Denver Streets Bike lanes Sidewalk use restricted to under 6 MPH and for scooter parking only California Streets, with MPH restrictions (typically 25 MPH) Bike lanes Protected bike lane, operate under 15 MPH Banned on sidewalks and after dark Current Topics for Consideration • Area of usage:Where is the best place for motorized/e-scooters?Currently states and municipalities vary, allowing them on streets, bike lanes, and sidewalks depending on the location. Using speed restrictions is a common way to regulate usage in different types of facilities. • Parking: Scooter parking on sidewalks has been problematic for municipalities that must maintain a clear path of travel on the sidewalk. E-scooter share companies are now being sued for violation of ADA compliance. • Geofencing: A tool cities are using to regulate the speed and areas e-scooters are able to be operated. • Helmets: Requirements vary by location. 2 d-lb Watertown BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN