Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout10 October 12, 2005 Commission74423 RECORDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS ORTATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TIME: 9:00 a.m. DATE: Wednesday, October 12, 20 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Adminis 4080 Lemon Street, First Flc 5 rative Center or, Riverside Commis ioners Chairman: Robin Lowe 1" Vice Chairman. Marion Ashley 2"d Vice Chairman: (Terry Henderson Bob Buster, Cou ty of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, ounty of Riverside Jeff Stone, Cou ty of Riverside Roy Wilson, Cou ty of Riverside Marion Ashley, Co my of Riverside Barbara Hanna / Art Welch, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Robert Crain / George Thomas, City of Blythe Shenna Mogeet / John Chlebnik / Jon Winningham, City of Calimesa Mary Craton / John Zait, City of Canyon Lake Gregory S. Pettis / Paul Marchand, City of Cathedral City Juan M. DeLara / Richard Macknicki, City of Coachella Jeff Miller / Karen Spiegel, City of Corona Matt Weyuker / Henry "Hank" Hohdhstein, City of Desert Hot Springs Robin Lowe / Lori Van rsdale, City of Hemet Mary Roche / Robert Bernh4imer, City of Indian Wells Michael H. Wilson / Gene Gilbert, City of Indio Terry Henderson / Don Adolph, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Robert L. Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore Frank West / Charles White, City of Moreno Valley Kelly Seyarto / Rick Gibbs, City of Murrieta Frank Hall / Harvey Sullivan, City of Norco Dick Kelly / Robert Spiecel, City of Palm Desert Ronald Oden / Ginny Foat, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Mark Yarbrough, City of Perris Ron Meepos / Harvey Gerbr, City of Rancho Mirage Ameal Moore / Steve Adams, City of Riverside Chris Buydos / Jim Conner, City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff ComerCher°, City of Temecula Vacant, Governor's Appointee Eric Haley, Executive Director Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you ish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Testimony C rd to the Clerk of the Commission. 11.36.00 " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:00 a.m. Wednesday, October 12, 2005 BOARDROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Items not listed on the agenda) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES  September 14, 2005 6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. if there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda October 12, 2005 Page 2 7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 7A. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO UPDATE MEASURE "A" REVENUE FORECAST Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the release of a request for proposals (RFP) to update the Measure "A" revenue forecast. Page 1 7B. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 06-31-518 FOR ADVANCE TO THE CITY OF INDIO Page 3 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-31-518, "Agreement for Advancement of 2009 Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Funds," to advance up to $4,000,000 of new Measure "A" funds to the City of Indio (Indio) utilizing proceeds from the commercial paper program; and, 2). Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 7C. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT Page 36 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Interfund Loan Activity Report for the month ended August 31, 2005. 7D. FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AMENDMENT AND ALLOCATION OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS TO PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY Page 38 Overview This item is for the Commission to amend Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency's Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) and allocate $34,142 in Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for payment on a trolley purchase. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda October 12, 2005 Page 3 7E. WESTERN RIVERSIDE MEASURE "A" SPECIALIZED TRANSIT PROGRAM: INLAND AIDS PROJECT Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 40 1) Allocate $11,000 in Western Riverside Measure "A" Specialized Transit funding to Inland AIDS Project; and, 2) Approve Agreement No. 06-26-545, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 04-26-511, with Inland AIDS Project for provision of specialized transit services in Western Riverside County. 7F. FISCAL YEAR 2006-20101 IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR 1 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY Overview MEASURE "A" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL OCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE Page 42 This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 2006-2010 Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Cathedral City. 7G. SURPLUS MADISON STATION GROUNDS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 53 1) Declare the property identified as the former Madison Station Grounds (4.15 acres) located on Railroad Avenue between Madison Street and Jefferson Avenue in Riverside, APN Nos. 230-233-013, 230-245-013, 230-245-015, 230-253-010 as surplus; and, 2) Authorize staff to initiate the sixty (60) day public agency notification period and, if no interest is expressed, authorize the Executive Director to offer the parcel for sale. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda October 12, 2005 Page 4 7H. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Page 59 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. 8. REPORT ON PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING ISSUES Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the report on planning and programming issues. Page 82 9. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 06-33-548, AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT NO. 03-31-014, WITH CHONG PARTNERS ARCHITECTURE TO PREPARE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR A PARKING STRUCTURE FOR THE NORTH MAIN CORONA METROLINK STATION Page 84 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-33-548, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 03-31-014 to prepare the plans, specifications and cost estimate (PS&E) for the amount of $900,665 and a total not to exceed amount of $1,294,853; 2) Approve the total design and construction project budget of $26,294,853; and, 3) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 10. APPROVAL OF ALAMEDA CORRIDOR EAST (ACE) TRADE CORRIDOR RAIL CROSSING GRADE SEPARATION PRIORITY LIST Page 99 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Review the Average Daily Traffic counts for the Avenue 48/ Dillon Road Crossing; and, 2) Approve the Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Trade Corridor Rail Crossing Grade Separation Priority List. . Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda October 12, 2005 Page 5 11. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 12. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. Boards/Committees/Conferences • 91 Toll Road Advisory Committee • Major Investment Study (MIS) Committee • Mobile Source Review Committee (MSRC) • Regional Transportation Agencies Coalition (RTAC) • SCAG Regional Council • SCAG Transportation and Communications Committee • Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) • APTA Annual Meeting • Rail -Volution Conference 13. CLOSED SESSION ITEM A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 54956.9 B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Government Code Section 54956.9 C. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 14. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, November 9, 2005, Board Room, County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSION MEETING COMMISSIONER SIGN -IN SHEET October 12, 2005 AGENC CONTACT # Q 767/44. /��� ,G-1"' 7G0 3 . 9' / t o.�✓\v\g , 9'S f 9Z2 0R S-C W1�l-e<- f� �Sh �� h..� 3/� .rr,l� / ,ve- s / MD�yv (....-e. / ,'5' /- 9/.?- Y.�1,6 -/zAAI ALL Nog,c-v ST/ - 735 - 2190 b ,-) 620e , IStAsf 9s/- lss- itJIG) 5'51-943-6roe, -_ ..... ifi�.. /4�� ��d--3a�^-// ea %if or r e,'l ©7z) lJfePLQ,' 76?-Z -SPt/ l 1 C, frd ‘e ! / / a lltir a5Cv 60-3 -06/ Milli 1 ( �m � s-.4-- %--(- 3/5 -$ Y 33 pdlp��'�yS" s"76' -/ ys o �`na�ANE�_ A. t��O✓(G21 �di(i�l.�PS � u n a 1 coupise( .G //n _ 2"K c./r/✓m p,2------ CIS) -757- i4i e-.--Lti'' (6,7tic�-- . .i y---- M R/t t ohl S)-» -L-'j p_Cgo,r .- -if`-'ti `lT(-9S 7 U,,s---c-, t ,��✓ L � e (�ic.`'`""-��`.' e -S�. </ -29 2— �1--c—am—.. G�©�C- �ji\i�a� h�\). ��-� y r- 9SS-10Ra /mac G i .f� � ice.\A'� ,, .. (9s1) 6 7y - (too . pi c-,, e_., ti, ,„... , nZT , ., C� ./ C(C) �L k (1), n� C7C- v Z-6 l 0 e Si _ 1 .�I � �.Yy-I��� �� �h`i VO. 5)-9. �40/ RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Pres nt Absent ROLL CALL October 12, 2005 verside, District 1 County of Riverside, District II unty;of Riverside; bistrict 'fll County'of Riverside, District IV ounty of Riverside Qistrict U City of Banning of Beaurion:t City of Blythe of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake of Cathedral City City of Coachella ,Drone City of Desert Hot Springs _ met City of Indian Wells ty of 'Indio' City of La Quinta e E'Ismore City of Moreno Valley City of Murneta City of Norco ity of;;Palrn Desert City of Palm Springs y_of,Perris City of I,Rancho Mirage City of 'Riverside City of ',San Jacinto City of Temecula Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8 AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON MINUTES Wednesday, September 14, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Robin Lowe at 8:42 a.m., lin the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At this time, Vice Chair Terry Henderson led the Commission in a flag salute. 3. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Marion Ashley Daryl Busch Bob Buster Chris Buydos Mary Craton Juan M. DeLara Jeff Fox Frank Hall Barbara Hanna Terry Henderson Hank Hohenstein Robin Lowe Dick Kelly Bob Magee Jeff Miller Ameal Moore Shenna Moqeet Ronald Oden Gregory S. Pettis Ron Roberts Mary Roche Patty Romo , Kelly Seyarto Jeff Stone John F. Tavaglione Frank West Michael H. Wilson Roy Wilson Robert Crain Ron Meepos Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 2 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Eric Haley, Executive Director, presented and introduced to the Commissioners the newly hired Commission staff members Anita Gutierrez; Senior Accounting Assistant, and Tara Byerly, Administrative Support Specialist. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - June 3 and July 13, 2005 M/S/C (Henderson/Fox) to approve the June 3 and July 13, 2005 minutes as submitted. Abstain: M. Wilson 6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS Eric Haley requested that the Commission add Approval of Agreement No. 06-31-544, State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Amendment for State Route 60 Widening Project from Valley Way to Interstate 15" to the agenda as an urgency item. This item arose after the agenda was posted and mailed, and there is a need that this item be addressed by the Commission at this time. M/S/C. (Stone/M.Wilson) to add "Approval of Agreement No. 06-31-544, State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Amendment for State Route 60 Widening Project from Valley Way to Interstate 15" as Agenda Item 13. At this time, Steven DeBaun, Legal Counsel, announced .the ..Closed Session items and the Commission adjourned to a Closed Session. Commission Jeff Miller recused himself from the discussion of Agenda Item 7C, Property Item 1, for conflict purposes. 7. CLOSED SESSION ITEM A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (a) Case No. C 05 1525 JSW i Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 3 B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision (b) of. Government Code Section 54956.9 Number of Claims: 14 C. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Negotiating Parties: RCTC - Executive Director or Designee Property Owners — See List of Property Owners Item APN Property Owner(s) Under Negotiation. 1 135-220-021 135-220-023 135-220-025 135-220-027 Arnel Development First Industrial (Grubb Low &Archibald Group, Ridge Property South Turner Company Realty Trust, Inc. & Ellis) Real Estate Inc. Trust Coast Communities, LLC Development Corporation Price and Terms 2 263-080-010 263-080-011 263-091-011 263-100-010 263-070-004 John C. Georgetown Croul Properties, Inc. Price and Terms 3 581-090-006 Odegaard/Maerten Price and Terms 4 932-220-025 Clarke/Trahn Price and Terms The Commission meeting reconvened and Steven DeBaun announced that for Agenda Item 7B, the Commission authorized the rejection of all claims listed under this item. 8. PUBLIC HEARING — FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 AMENDMENT TO SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY'S SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN — REVISED PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR SECTION 5307 FUNDS Tanya Love, Program Manager, reviewed the revised program of projects for Section 5307 funds and SunLine Transit Agency's request to amend the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reprogram the funds. The public hearing Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 4 was noticed and no written or verbal comments have been received regarding the proposed projects. At this time, Chair Lowe opened the public hearing. Hearing no request for testimony, the Chair closed the public hearing. M/S/C (Busch/Ashley) to: 1) Approve the addition of $1,941,392 in operating funds to the Indio/Cathedral City/Palm Springs urbanized area Program of Projects; 2) Direct staff to include the operating funds in the 2004 Regional Transportation Improvement Plan; and, 3) Amend SunLine Transit Agency's FY 2005-06 Short Range Transit Plan to reflect the change. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Bob Buster requested that Agenda Item 9H, "Status Report on the Mid County Parkway", be pulled from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Commissioner Dick Kelly commented on Agenda Item 9Q, "SunLine Transit Agency: Follow-up Review and Skills Assessment", recognizing the outstanding work of Mikel Oglesby, SunLine General Manager, and the SunLine staff for organizational improvements. Chair Lowe, on behalf of the Commission, recognized the SunLine Board for its outstanding leadership. Eric Haley commented on Agenda Item 9L, "State Route 74/Interstate 215 Interchange Project Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1273 (RCTC Agreement No. 06-31-513) Between Cahrans and RCTC", providing background information on the cooperative agreement and noting Commissioner Bob Magee's concerns regarding timeliness issues. In discussions with Caltrans, they are working on a new set of policies that would commit to a rapid turnaround to improve project delivery. Patty Romo provided an overview of the "Partnership to Improve Delivery" proposed by Caltrans in an effort to provide timely review and approval as well as issue resolution for project development and delivery. i Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 5 In response to Commissioner John ITavaglione inquiry, Patty Romo assured Commissioner Tavaglione that the County of Riverside Transportation Department will be included in the full document. M/S/C (Miller/Ashley) to approve the following Consent Calendar items: 9A. GUIDELINES FOR 2009 MEASURE "A" ADVANCEMENT OF LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FUNDS 1) Approve the conceptual framework for the 2009 Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Financing Guidelines; and, 2) Direct staff to develop specific financing guidelines based on such framework and present such guidelines to the Commission for its future review and approval. 9B. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 06-31-517 FOR ADVANCE TO CVAG 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-31-517, "Agreement for Advancement of 2009 Measure "A" Highway and Major Regional Road Funds",to advance up to $43,300,000 of new Measure "A" funds to Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) utilizing proceeds from the Commercial Paper Program; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 9C. FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 BUDGET AMENDMENTS Approve the budget amendments of: 1) $6,500,000 for Measure Local Streets and Roads expenditures; 2) $2,141,556 for arbitrage rebate expenditures; and, 3) $2,893,216 for transfers related to the reimbursement to the TUMF fund by the Commercial Paper fund for land acquisition costs. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 6 9D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. 9E. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the twelve- month period ended June 30, 2005. 9F. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2005. 9G. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT Receive and file the Interfund Loan Activity Report for the month ended July 31, 2005. 91. ANNUAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND PLANNING ALLOCATIONS TO CVAG.AND WRCOG Approve allocations of Local Transportation Planning Funds totaling 284,355 to the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and $521,318 to the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) to support transportation planning programs and functions as identified in the attached work programs. 9J. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 05-012, A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SUPERCEDING RESOLUTION 91-002 AND ADOPTING AN UPDATED POLICY DESIGNATING OFFICIALS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS" Adopt Resolution No. 05-012, `A Resolution of the Riverside, County Transportation Commission Superceding Resolution 91-002 and Adopting an Updated Policy Designating Officials Authorized to Execute Agreements, Ordinances and Resolutions" " Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 7 9K. ALLOCATION OF CMAQ FUNDING FOR THE INLAND EMPIRE TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT CENTER PROJECT Allocate and program $6 million in Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program funds (SAFETEA LU) for construction of the Inland Empire Transportation Management Center. 9L. STATE ROUTE 74/INTERSTATE 215 INTERCHANGE PROJECT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT! NO. 8-1273 IRCTC AGREEMENT NO. 06-31-513) BETWEEN CALTRANS AND RCTC 1) Approve Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1273 (RCTC Agreement No. 06-31-513) with Caltrans for the preparation of a Project Approval and Environmental Document for the SR 74/1-215 Interchange improvement project in the City of Perris; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission, 9M. FUNDING ADJUSTMENT FOR THE STATE ROUTE 60 MORENO VALLEY HOV MEDIAN WIDENING PROJECT 1) Approve the adjustment of the existing project budget for the State Route 60 Moreno Valley High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) median widening project, to allow use of approximately $2,013,500 of the $3,041,230 project contingency for anticipated remaining project contract expenditures follows: a) $1,270,000 to ,cover additional costs associated with construction Agreement No. 03-31-052, with SEMA Construction, Inc., increasing the construction contract contingency amount from $2,380,951 to $3,650,951, for a total contract amount not to exceed $27,570,000; b) $380,000 to cover existing RCTC Agreements with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for Construction Zone Enhancement Enforcement Program (COZEEP); c) $363,500 to associated with and right of way' cover anticipated additional costs final design, construction management, acquisition; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 8 2) Approve .the reduction of the Commission's budgeted Measure "A" Matching Funding (11.47%) from $6,000,000 to $4,594,000 in order to be consistent with the policy to maximize use of federal funds, and increase the CMAQ amount from $34,800,000 to $35,456,000; and, 3) Approve a FY 2005-06 budget amendment of $290,900 for increased project expenditures. 9N. FUNDING ADJUSTMENT FOR THE STATE ROUTE 74 WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN 1-15 IN LAKE ELSINORE AND 7T" STREET IN THE CITY OF PERRIS Approve an increase to the project budget for the State Route 74 widening project between 1-15 in Lake Elsinore and 7t Street in the City of Perris from $69,847,655 to $76,446,874 (an increase of $6,599,219). 90. FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS 1) Receive and file the revised estimate of FY 2005-06 State Transit Assistance Funds; and, 2) Notify the Riverside County Transit Operators of the revised estimate. 9P. PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Review and reaffirm the Productivity Improvement Program. 9Q. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY: FOLLOW-UP REVIEW AND SKILLS ASSESSMENT 1) Receive and approve the Follow-up Review and Skills Assessment Report for SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine); and, . 2) Forward the report to SunLine. 9R. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY'S REQUEST FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS PENDING RECEIPT OF FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 FTA SECTION 5307 FUNDS Allocate $590,000 in Local Transportation Funds (LTF) to the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) pending receipt of FY 2004-05 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 funds. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 9 9S. FISCAL YEAR 2006-2010 MEASURE "A" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITIES OF LAKE ELSINORE AND SAN JACINTO 9T. Approve the FY 2006-2010 Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the Cities of Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT WITH PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE TO PROVIDE FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL SERVICE ON BEAT #18 AND BEAT #25 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-45-510, Amendment No. 3 to Freeway Service Patrol, Tow Truck Agreement No. 02-45-071, with Pepe's Towing Services, Inc. to increase the hourly rate from $42.50 to $43.75 for Beat #18 on SR 60/1-215; 2) Approve Agreement No. 06-45-511, Amendment No. 1 to Freeway Service Patrol Tow Truck Agreement No. 02-45-072, with Pepe's Towing Services, Inc., to increase the hourly rate from $42.50 to $43.75 for Beat #25 along 1-15; and, 3) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. 9U. AWARD OF AGREEMENT NO. 06-45-531 FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL TOW TRUCK SERVICE 1) Award Agreement No. 06-45-531, a three-year contract with two one-year options, to Hamner Towing for tow truck service on Beat #1 of the Freeway Service Patrol program at a cost not to exceed $43.75 per hour per truck; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement ion behalf of the Commission. . 9V. QUARTERLY GOODS MOVEMENT UPDATE Receive and file the Quarterly Goods Movement Update. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 10 9W. APPROVE THE LIST OF PRE -QUALIFIED FIRMS AND AWARD OF AGREEMENT NOS. 06-25-526, 06-25-527, AND 06-25-528 FOR ON -CALL GOODS MOVEMENT CONSULTANT SERVICES 1) Approve the list of pre -qualified firms for on -call goods movement consultant services: Cambridge Systematics, Kimley-Horn and Associates, and Parsons Brinckerhoff; 2) Award Agreement No. 06-25-526 to Cambridge Systematics, Agreement No. 06-25-527 to Kimley-Horn and Associates, and Agreement No. '06=25-528 to Parsons Brinckerhoff for on -call goods movement consultant services; and, 3) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. 9X. PUBLIC OUTREACH EFFORTS UPDATE AND REQUEST TO RELEASE AN RFP FOR PUBLIC OUTREACH CONSULTANT SUPPORT 1) Receive and file the Public Outreach Efforts Update; and, 2) Authorize the release of a Request for Proposal for Public Outreach Consultant Support Services .in an amount not to exceed $50,000. 9Y. SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY POLICY Approve the Surplus Real Property Policy. 9Z. PROPERTY TRADE FOR CITY OF RIVERSIDE MULTI -MODAL CENTER Approve the trade of assessor parcel numbers (APN) 215-350-018 and 215-341-004 for approximately 6,500 square feet of the City of Riverside's well site on Vine Street (APN 215-341-007) contingent upon the opening of the East Side Metrolink parking lot on Commerce Street and the City funding of the costs of identification and remediation of contaminants on APN 215-341-007, if any. 9AA. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 11 9BB. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 1) Adopt the following bill and associated policy position: SEEK AMENDMENTS-SCA 15 (McClintock, R-Thousand Oaks) SEEK AMENDMENTS-ACA 22 (LaMalfa, R-Richvale); and, 2) Receive and file the state and federal legislative update. 10. STATUS REPORT: RIDERSHIP, OPERATING COSTS, FAREBOX, AND CAPITAL PROJECT ANALYSIS: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSIT OPERATORS Tanya Love presented a status report on the Riverside County transit operators' ridership, operating costs, farebox recovery, including the status of their capital projects. This information was presented in detail to the Transit Policy Committee at its July meeting. At the meeting, the transit operators presented data specific to their operations. It is projected that in approximately three to five years at the current pace of allocation and based on revenue stream, there will not 'Ibe adequate funding to support transit services. This staff report was prov ded to the transit operators for feedback and comments, and no comments have been received. In response to Commissioner Tavaglione's question regarding Corona's farebox revenue, Tanya Love explained that the City of Corona is mandated a higher percentage than other areas because Corona serves an urbanized area and elected to have a general public dial -a -ride program and as a result requires a 20% farebox revenue return. Tanya Love continued and reviewed the policies that have been putinto place including the Productivity Improvement Program, the 10% reserve fund for the transit operators, and the adoption of a funding policy for Western Riverside County. She noted that the funding policy formula needs to be reviewed in FY 2008 and any changes need to be implemented in FY 2010. Commissioner Terry Henderson noted that Transit Policy Committee has made considerable progress, particu arty in securing facts and figures, which is a start. She then requested Tanya Love review the software program that may be of assistance to the transit operators to monitor productivity and other transit related activities. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 12 Tanya Love explained that a software program could analyze data at a route by route level and tie to the productivity improvement program and return meaningful data for the Commission and the transit operators. It would still be a policy board direction once that data was analyzed. Acquisition of the software was a recommendation made in the triennial performance report. At this time, Commissioner Henderson requested Commission guidance on direction that the Transit Policy Committee should take as it relates to ridership and cost. She remarked on the importance of stayingon top of this issue. In response to Commissioner Mary Craton's question regarding potential of capital funds allocations that are not being claimed in a timely manner being reclaimed by the federal government, Tanya Love responded that at this time, funds are safe because they are in an approved grant application. In response to Commissioner Craton's concern in trying to determine what the major problem is with the funds not being spent in a timely manner, Chair Lowe requested staff provide a report on this issue. Commissioner Craton requested additional information on the impact that decreasing routes or increasing fares would have on the community prior to giving policy direction. Commissioner Tavaglione stated that he believes one of the major issues is on the allocation of the capital costs and asked if the operators have to provide detailed plans, including .projection for cost increases, as to how and when the funds will be used and if the Commission has guidelines to ensure that the operators utilize funds in a timely manner or lose ,the funds. In addition, he asked if the Commission requires a match by the operators. Tanya Love indicated that the Commission's policy states that when capital funds are allocated to a transit operator, the operator is expected to spend those funds in a timely manner. Transit operators are requested to provide capital project milestone reports on a quarterly basis. Tanya Love stated that the Commission allocates the match, noting federal funding is 80% and the local match is 20% from TDA or TUMF funds. Commissioner Tavaglione asked if there is an incentive to the transit operators to ensure that funds are spent in a timely manner and Tanya Love responded that there is no policy in place. " Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 13 Commissioner Hank Hohenstein referenced a newspaper article that said individuals are responding to higher gas prices by were taking funds out of other discretionary income. He suggested that the Commission look at how people are responding to higher gas prices in an effort to increase ridership and decrease costs. Commissioner Jeff Miller provided a detailed outline of the process that the Transit Policy Committee went through in reviewing the allocation of the capital costs and emphasized the importance to continue working through the committee process and with the transit operators to address the issues. The goal is not to micromanage the transit operators as the Commission is responsible for allocation of funding.; Commissioner Frank Hall concurred with Commission Miller's comments and recommended that rather than discussing individual routes, the Commission set goals, particularly where it is 'recognized there is a potential problem overall or with any individual operator. Commissioner Ron Roberts recommended the Commission needs a different mindset to get commuters out of cars and onto public transit. He also suggested a bus lane on the 1-15 that goes to Escondido and further south. He expressed the difficulty of removing existing bus routes and recommended the Commission and the transit operators work closely to address these issues. Commissioner Shenna Moqeet concurred with Commissioner Roberts's comments regarding a different mindset and outlined issues that cause commuters not to utilize public transit including timeliness and destination. In response to Commissioner Roberts's comments, Eric Haley noted that the new expenditure plan looks at long distance commutes and intercity bus services that the Commission will be directly funding. He then outlined future considerations and discussions necessary for program funding. He suggested quarterly meetings of the Transit Policy Committee and noted a meeting will be scheduled with officials in San Diego County to talk about transit and highway issues. Chair Lowe suggested that the Transit Policy Committee meet in October. In addition, she concurred with the acquisition of a transit software program. She noted the excellent cooperation from the transit operators and reinforced Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 14 Commissioner Miller's comments regarding the Commission's responsibility for allocation of funding and . its intention to not micromanage transit operations. Commissioner Henderson concurred with the suggestion to schedule quarterly meetings for the Transit Policy Committee. She noted that the SunLine Transit Agency is conducting a study to examine all their routes and suggested that the process and results of the study be . shared with the Commission and transit operators. M/S/C (Henderson/Ashley) to: 1) Receive and file the Status Report on Ridership, Operating Costs, Farebox, and Capital Project Analysis for Riverside County Transit Operators; and, 2) Based on comments received at today's meeting, direct staff to prepare and present a report to the Transit Policy Committee at their meeting in October. 11. APPROVAL OF ALAMEDA CORRIDOR EAST (ACE) TRADE CORRIDOR RAIL CROSSING GRADE SEPARATION PRIORITY LIST Due to time constraints, Chair Lowe recommended this item be deferred to the next Commission meeting. M/S/C (Henderson/R.Wilson) to defer this item to the October Commission meeting. 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY -ORANGE COUNTY MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDY: UPDATE ON STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVES Cathy Bechtel, Division Head of Planning, provided an update on the Riverside County -Orange County Major Investment Study. Tony Rahimian, Project Management Consultant, reviewed the five corridors under study and presented the projected 2030 traffic demand volumes on those corridors as well as the three strategic alternatives undergoing further evaluation. Public outreach efforts will continue with two public meeting in October and a recommendation of .the locally preferred strategy will be presented to the Commission and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in December. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 15 At Commissioner Miller's request, Tony Rahimian clarified that both options - a nearly full tunnel or a combination of surface and tunnel - for the corridor from Corona to Irvine are still being considered. In response to Commission Buste''s question regarding the breakout of projected traffic volume after the improvements, Tony Rahimian provided an estimate of approximately 300,000 javerage daily trips (ADTs) on the SR 91 corridor, 70,000-100,000 ADTs on the Corona to Irvine corridor depending on the toll option, and 20,000-35,000 ADTs on the SR 74/Ortega Highway corridor. M/S/C to receive and file the update on the Riverside County -Orange County Major Investment Study Strategic Alternatives. 13. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 06-31-544, STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP) AMENDMENT FOR STATE ROUTE 60 WIDENING PROJECT FROM VALLEY WAY TO INTERSTATE 15 Anne Mayer, Division Head of Programming and Administration, explained the urgency of this item and summarized the efforts that have been made to fund the project. M/S/C (Tavaglione/Stone) to: 1) Approve a request to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) to allocate $3.058 million of Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds; 2) Approve Agreement No. 06-31-544, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 04-31-028, for a STIP Amendment for the State Route 60 Widening Project from Valley Way to Interstate 15; and, 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel_ review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 14. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 9H. STATUS REPORT ON THE MID COUNTY PARKWAY Commissioner Buster provided an overview of the planned improvements by the Countyion Cajalco Road and expressed concern for the potential impact that the Mid County Parkway project schedule delays may have on the County's improvements. He requested the Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 14, 2005 Page 16 RCTC and Riverside County Transportation Department staff members meet to begin an effort to separate the projects where possible so the County can move forward with its improvements. M/S/C (Busch/DeLara) to receive and file the status report on the Mid County Parkway project. 15. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. Eric Haley: • Commended Bechtel Corporation for their technical support to the Cities of Norco and Corona and Riverside County Economic Development Agency related to the Naval Weapons facility. • Announced that the Rail Department is working with SCRRA to provide weekly passes and round trip tickets for displaced hurricane victims who are now in Riverside County. RTA is also providing bus passes to the victims. • Announced that the Los Angeles County Chapter of Women's Transportation Seminar .(WTS) will be recognizing RCTC as the Outstanding Employer of the Year. B. Commissioner Hall also commended Bechtel Corporation for their outstanding and timely work on the Naval Weapons facility report. 16. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the meeting adjourned at 1 1:01 . a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., on Wednesday, October 12, 2005, at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Board Room, Riverside, California, 92501. Respectfully submitted, Naty Kopenhaver Clerk of the Commission " AGENDA " ITEM 7A I RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Division Head, Programming and Administration SUBJECT: Request for Proposal to Update Measure "A" Revenue forecast STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the release of a request for proposals (RFP) to update the Measure "A" revenue forecast. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission's last update to the Measure "A" revenue forecast was completed in May 2001. This forecast, which was prepared with the assistance of Ernst & Young LLP, included the proposed 30-year extension of Measure "A" through 2039. As a result of the significant economic growth in Riverside County and as noted by Eric Haley at the Commission's June workshop, the Commission's fiscal year (FY) 2004-05 Measure "A" revenues forecasted for FY 2007-08. Accordingly useful for budgeting and strategic planning will exceed the Measure "A" revenues the May 2001 forecast is no longer purposes. Staff is requesting the Committee's approval to issue an RFP to update the Measure "A" revenue forecast. Based on the proposed calendar below, it is expected that the update can be completed and used for the FY 2006-07 budget as well as the proposed 2009 Measure "A" 10-year delivery plan: Issue Request for Proposals 10/13/05 Due Date for Proposals 11 /11 /05 Complete Review of Proposals 11/18/05 Present Recommendation to Budget & Implementation Committee 11/28/05 Commission Approves Consultant Selection 12/14/05 Execute Consultant Contract 12/30/05 Begin Forecast Update 1 01 /02/06 Complete Forecast Update 02/10/06 Staff anticipates that the RFP will be sent out primarily to a few academic institutions with economic forecasting centers, and it will be posted on the Commission's website for others interested firms. Interviews are not currently Agenda Item 7A expected but may be scheduled depending on the number, of qualified proposals. This would likely extend the RFP calendar by one month. Staff anticipates that the. Executive Director will approve the consultant agreement under single signature authority, based on the estimated cost of the Measure "A" revenue forecast update. Financial .Information In Fiscal Year Budget:.' Yes Year: FY 2005-06 Amount:.. $20;000 Source of Funds: Measure "A" Budget Ad ustment: No GLA No.: 101-19-65503 P1001 01 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \�`�-€4,4,rajte, A Date: 9/16/05 Agenda Item 7A 2 e ADDITION TO AGENDA ITEM 7A October 12, 2005 uopefoad ;seoand s�diaoa�{ len13y--0— 600Z 800Z LOOZ 900Z 900Z 1700Z £OOZ ZOOZ 600Z sisAieud xel sales d amseew 000`000`On 000' 000 `017$ 000'000'09$ 000`000'08$ 000'000'00 1$ 000'000'0Z 6$ 000`000'0b6$ 000'000'0911 000'000`08 l.$ AGEND ITEM 7B " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission - FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Division Headj Programming and Administration SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement City of Indio No. 06-31-518 for Advance to the STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-31-518, "Agreement for Advancement of 2009 Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Funds," to advance up to $4,000,000 of new Measure I "A" funds to the City of Indio (Indio) utilizing proceeds from the commercial paper program; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND . INFORMATION: At its February 9, 2005 meeting, the Commission approved a $200,000,000 commercial paper program to provide advance funding for projects included in the, expenditure plan of the approved Measure "A" renewal of 2002. On March 30, 2005, a closing meeting was held in San Francisco to ensure that all documents related to the commercial paper program had been completed and signed by the required parties. Indio has requested funding not to exceed $7,000,000 from commercial paper proceeds with a 10-year repayment period for various overlay and pulverize capital projects as an advance of its share of Local Streets and Roads Funds under the 2009 Measure "A". However, this amount would result in debt service coverage. of 1.33 times the current Measure "A', local streets and roads allocations. Commission staff is in the process of developing advance funding guidelines with the consultation of its financial advisors, and it has been strongly suggested that the Commission require 2 times debt coverage, as this would be consistent with the Commission's adopted debt management policy. The maximum loan amount under the 2 times debt coverage policy approximates $4,000,000. Accordingly, the advance funding amount included in the attached agreement is $4,000,000. Agenda Item 7B Under the agreement, Indio would, be reimbursed for. actual project costs after submitting an invoice with appropriate documentation. Interest will be charged based on a variable rate of '/z percent over the interest paid by the Commission on funds outstanding under the commercial paper program or long-term debt that may be issued in 2008 to refinance the commercial paper. The '/2 percent interest noted above is a reimbursement to the Commission for the cost of issuing and administering the advance. Indio has the option for . early repayment by December 31, 2007. Otherwise, advance repayments will begin in September 2009 for a ten-year period by applying a portion of Indio's Local Streets and Roads funds from the 2009 Measure "A" to the advance payment due. Receipts from State Board of Equalization relating to sales taxes collected under the 2009 Measure "A" are expected to commence in September 2009. To secure Indio's repayment obligation, it will enter into a lease/leaseback or another security . arrangement with the Commission. Indio has also proposed transportation projects for funding using proceeds from the Commission's Commercial Paper advance to Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). Staff is requesting Commission approval of this agreement. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2005-06 Amount: $4,000,000 Source of funds: Commercial Paper Budget Ad ustment: No GLA No.: 303-71-12301-P8100-80 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \l/teudv,14 Date: 9/16/05` Attachment: Agreement No. 06-31-518 Agenda Item 7B " F Agreement No. 06-31-518 AGREEMENT FOR ADVANCEMENT OF 2009 MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FUNDS 1. Parties and Date. This Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of this day of , 2005, by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC" or "Commission") and the City of Indio ("City") located in the County of Riverside, State of California: 2. Recitals. 2.1 RCTC is a county transportation commission created and existing pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Sections 130053 and 130053.5. 2.2 The City is a municipality with local; streets and roads requiring maintenance, development and rehabilitation. 2.3 In 1988, RCTC enacted and the voters of Riverside County ("County") approved Measure "A" (1989 Measure `A') which authorized RCTC to impose a retail transaction and use tax of one-half percent (.5%) throughout the County of Riverside for up to twenty years. This tax is popularly known as a one-half cent sales tax. 2.4 The 1989 Measure "A." tax was due to expire in 2009, but on November 5, 2002, a thirty year extension of the half -cent sales tax was approved by voters of the County ("2009 Measure `A"'). 2.5 The Transportation Improvement Plan ("Plan") implementing the 2009 Measure "A" provides that thirty-five percent of the 2009 Measure "A" revenues will be returned to the cities and County of county of Coachella Valley for local street and road improvements ("Local Streets and Roads Funding") in amounts based on a formula weighted 50% on proportionate dwelling units and 50% on 2009 Measure "A" generated with each jurisdiction. 2.6 The proceeds of the retail transaction and use tax ("2009 Measure ` `A' Funds") are collected by the California. Board of Equalization pursuant to a contract between RCTC and the Board of Equalization, and paid to RCTC monthly. 2.7 The Commission has authorized the issuance of commercial paper in the amount of $200,000,000. (The "2005 Commercial Paper Program"). A portion of the proceeds of the 2005 Commercial Paper Program, which was initially established at $190,000,000 based on a direct pay letter of credit, will provide funding for the advance provided herein. 2.8 The City has requested and RCTC has agreed that RCTC will advance to the City certain amounts which the City and RCTC anticipate. RCTC would otherwise collect and allocate to the City as its share of Local Streets and Roads Funding, as allocated pursuant to the formula set forth in the Plan. 1 of 8 2.9 The funds shall be used to finance a portion of the cost of certain improvements more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto ("Project"). 2.10 The City agrees that it will repay to RCTC the advance and costs associated therewith described herein from Local Streets and Roads Funding and shall secure such repayment obligation by way of a lease/lease-back arrangement or other acceptable security arrangement approved by RCTC. " 3. Terms. 3.1 Advance of 2009 Measure "A" Funds. A. Amount of Advance: RCTC agrees to distribute to the City, on terms and conditions set forth herein, a sum not to exceed Seven Million Dollars ($4,000,000.00) (the "Advance"). B. Interest. The Advance shall only accrue interest on that portion of the Advance actually distributed to the City. Once any portion of the Advance is distributed to the City, interest shall accrue from this date and said interest shall be payable by the City at a rate of 'A percent over the interest rate paid by RCTC on funds outstanding under the 2005 Commerical Paper Program. In the event the bonds of the 2005 Commercial Paper Program are converted into long term bonds;' the City shall pay interest on the outstanding' balance of the Advance at a rate of'h percent over the interest rate of the long term bonds. The above -described '/z percent interest rate shall reimburse RCTC for the cost of issuing and administering the Advance. C. Repayment of Advance. The City shall repay the Advance, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, to RCTC in one hundred and twenty (120) monthly installments commencing on September 1, 2009 amortized over the period from the date of this Agreement until September 1, 2019 ("Maturity Date") to be calculated by RCTC based on the amount of the Advance, with each installment due no later than the thirtieth (30`h) of each month, until the Maturity "Date or repayment in full of all outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest, whichever is earlier, D. Early Repayment. The City shall have the right to repay the entire unpaid principal balance of the Advance, plus accrued interest, without penalty, no later than December 31, 2007. The City intends, but is not obligated to, seek funding from altemative sources to repay Advance. Such alternative sources include ,eligible TUMF funds, as well as grants and appropriations from the Indian Gaming Distribution Fund as well as applicable state and federal programs. 3.2 Repayment. A. Authorization to Apply Local Streets and Roads Funding to Payments; Pledge of Additional Security. For so long as any obligation of the City under this Agreement remains outstanding, the City hereby instructs RCTC to apply the City's portion of any Local Streets and Roads Funding which would otherwise be distributed to the City as Local Streets and Road Funding under the 2009 Measure "A" Plan to pay any due but unpaid 2 of 8 " obligations of the City to RCTC under this Agreement. To further secure the City's repayment obligation, the City shall either (i) enter into a lease/lease-back arrangement with RCTC in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit `Bj' hereto or (ii) enter into another security arrangement acceptable to RCTC ("Additional Security"). The parties acknowledge that the Advance is not a general obligation of the City, but is rather a special obligation of the City payable solely from the City's portion of any Local Streets and Roads Funding which would otherwise be distributed to the City under the 2009 Measure "A". The parties further acknowledge that the Additional Security is ,not a debt for purposes of the California Constitution. Consequently, neither the faith and credit nor the taxing powers of the City are pledged for repayment of the Advance or the Additional Security. B. Remaining Balance (Payable. RCTC shall. notify the City of the calculation and application of funds made under Section 3.2(A) above, and any amounts then due to RCTC from the City, within thirty (30) days of RCTC's calculation and application of such amounts. RCTC's calculations shall be final, absent clerical or mathematical error. The City shall pay to RCTC any balance due within thirty (30) days of receipt of such notice from RCTC of such amount. 3.3 Conditions of the Advance. The obligation of RCTC to make the Advance shall be subject to the condition precedent that RCTC shall have received, in form and substance satisfactory to RCTC, all of the following: A. Duly executed copies of this Agreement, Additional Security and such other documents as RCTC may request in order to fully effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement. B. Such documents and certificates regarding the existence, authority and power of the City to execute this Agreement and any related documents as RCTC deems reasonably necessary. 3.4 City's Representations and Warranties. The City hereby makes the following representations and warranties which shall be deemed to be continuing representations and warranties so long as the Advances remains outstanding: A. Agreement Authorized. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, the Additional Security andl any and all related documents (collectively "Advance Documents") are duly authorized and do not require the further consent or approval of any body, board or commission or other authority: B. No Default. The City is not in default, nor is it aware of any events that, with the passage of time or the giving of notice, would constitute an event of default on any obligation of the City to RCTC or on any existing public debt issuance of the City. C. No Conflict. The execution, delivery and performance of the Advances Documents does not contravene or conflict with any constitutional provision, law, statute, regulation, or any agreement, indenture on undertaking to which the City is a party or by which it or the 2009 Measure "A" Funds may be; bound or affected, and does not and will not 3 of 8 cause any lien, charge or other encumbrance to be created or imposed upon the 2009 Measure "A" Funds by reason thereof. D. Solvency. The City is solvent. E. No Violation of RCTC Measure"A" Advance Policies. The City is not in violation of the policies of RCTC for recipients of Advance Funds, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C." F. Litigation. There is no litigation or other proceeding pending or threatened against or affecting the City and relating to the Advance, or the Advance Documents, or the transactions contemplated herein or thereby. G. Financial Condition. All financial statements and data submitted in writing by the City. to RCTC in connection with the request for Advance are true and correct, and said statements truly represent the financial condition of the City as of the date thereof and the results of the operations of the City for the period covered thereby and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles on a basis consistently maintained, and that since such date there have been no materially adverse changes in the ordinary course of business. The City has no knowledge of any liabilities, contingent or otherwise, at such date not reflected in said statements, and the City has not entered into any special commitments or substantial contracts which are not reflected in said statements other than in the ordinary and normal course. of business, which may have a materially adverse effect upon its financial condition or operations as now conducted. 3.5 City's Affirmative Covenants. The City agrees that so long as the Advance is outstanding, it will, unless RCTC shall otherwise consent in writing: A. Use of Advance. Use the Advance only for purpose and project identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. In addition, the City recognizes that under 2009 Measure "A Plan the purpose of Local Streets and Roads Funding is to assist with the maintenance, development, and rehabilitation of the existing the City and County road system in Coachella Valley, and the City agrees that the Advance shall only be used in a manner consistent with the portions of the 2009 Measure "A" Plan related to Coachella Valley Local Streets and Road Funding. B. Records and Reports. Maintain a standard and modern system of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles on a basis consistently maintained and furnish RCTC annual audited financial statements and such other information relating to the affairs of the City or the uses of the Advance as RCTC reasonably may request from time to time. C. Inspection. Permit, at any reasonable time, upon reasonable notice, qualified personnel designated by RCTC in writing, to inspect any projects funded by the Advance and any records maintained in connection therewith. RCTC shall have no duty to make any such inspection and shall not incur any liability or obligation by reason of making or not making any such inspection. 4of8 8 " D. Notice of Default. I Promptly notify RCTC in writing of the occurrence of any Event of Default hereunder or of any event which would become an Event of Default hereunder upon giving of notice, lapse of lime, or both. 3.6 City's Negative Covenants! The City will not, so long as the Advance remains outstanding, without RCTC's prior written consent create, incur, assume or permit to exist any mortgage, deed of trust, security interest (whether possessory or nonpossessory) or other lien upon or on the City's Local Share of the 2009 Measure "A" Funds other than liens in favor of RCTC. 3.7 Rights and Remedies. I A. RCTC shall at all times have the rights and remedies of a secured party under the Califomia Commercial Code ("Code") in addition to the rights and remedies provided herein or in any other agreement or document executed by the City. B. The rights and remedies of RCTC under this Agreement shall not be exhausted by the exercise of any of the rights or remedies of RCTC pursuant to this Agreement or any other agreement between the City and RCTC or any action, proceeding or any number of successive actions or proceedings, unless and until all of the sums owing RCTC by the City shall be fully paid, performed and discharged. All rights and remedies afforded to. RCTC pursuant hereto or under any other agreement at any time in effect between the City and RCTC (whether or not there are other parties in addition to the City and RCTC) shall be separate and cumulative and in addition to any and all rights or remedies available at law, in or otherwise, and no one of such rights or remedies, whether exercised or not, shall be deemed to be in exclusion of any other right or remedy available and shall in no way limit or prejudice any other right or remedy. The exercise of any one of such rights or remedies shall not be deemed a waiver of, or an election not to exercise, any other right or remedy. 3.8 Events of Default. The occurrence of any one or more of the following. events 'shall, at RCTC's option, constitute an event of default (each an "Event of Default") and the City shall provide RCTC with immediate notice thereof A. Any warranty, representation, statement, report or certificate made or delivered to RCTC by the City or any of thei City's officers, employees or agents now or hereafter which is incorrect, false, untrue or misleading in any material respect; or B. The City shall fail to pay, perform or comply with, or otherwise shall breach, any obligation, warranty; term or condition in this Agreement or any amendment to this Agreement, or any agreement delivered pursuant hereto; or C. There shall occur any of the following: dissolution, termination of existence or insolvency of the City; the commencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency law by or against the City; entry of a court order which enjoins, restrains or in any way prevents the City from paying any sums owed by the City to RCTC. 3.9 Indemnification. The City shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend RCTC from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses, 5 of 8 including interest, penalties, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, incurred or suffered, which arise, result from, or relate to City's breach of or failure to perform any of its agreements, covenants, obligations, representations, or warranties contained herein. Such indemnity shall survive the termination or discharge of this Agreement. 3.10 Procedures for Distribution of the Advance. A. ' Initial Payment by the City. The City shall be responsible for initial payment of all the Project costs as they are incurred. Following payment of such Project costs, the City shall submit invoices to RCTC requesting reimbursement of those eligible costs described in section 3.5.A. of this Agreement. Each invoice shall be accompanied by detailed contractor invoices, or other demands for payment addressed to the City, and documents evidencing the City's payment of the invoices or demands for payment. The City shall submit invoices not more often than monthly and not less often than quarterly. B. Review and Reimbursement by RCTC. Upon receipt of an invoice from the City, RCTC may request additional documentation or explanation of the Project costs for which reimbursement is sought. Undisputed amounts shall be paid by RCTC to the City within thirty (30) days: In the event that RCTC disputes the eligibility of the City for reimbursement of all or a portion of an invoiced amount, the Parties shall meet and confer in an attempt to resolve the dispute. If the meet and confer process is unsuccessful in resolving the dispute, the City may appeal RCTC's decision as to the eligibility of one or more invoices to RCTC's Executive Director. The City may appeal the decision of the Executive Director .to.the full RCTC Board, the decision of which shall be final. Additional details concerning the procedure for the City's submittal of invoices to RCTC and RCTC's consideration and payment of submitted invoices are set forth in Exhibit "D", attached hereto. C. Funding Amount/Adjustment. If a post Project audit or review indicates that RCTC has provided reimbursement to the City in an amount in excess of the Advance, or has provided reimbursement of ineligible Project costs, the City shall reimburse RCTC for the excess or ineligible payments within 30 days of notification by RCTC. 3.11 Miscellaneous. A. No Waiver. No waiver of any Event of Default or breach by the City hereunder shall be implied from any omission by RCTC to take action on account of such default, and no express waiver shall affect any default other than the default specified in the waiver and the waiver shall be operative only for the time and to. the extent therein stated. Waivers of any covenant, term, or condition contained herein shall not be construed as.a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same covenant, term or condition. The consent or approval by RCTC to or of any act by the City requiring further consent or approval shall not be deemed to waiveor render unnecessary the consent or approval to or of any subsequent similar act. B. No Third Parties Benefited. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of RCTC and the City and no third person, other than a permittedassignee or successor hereunder, shall have any right of action under this Agreement. 6of8 • 10 " C. Notices. All notices or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be considered as properly given if mailed by first class United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified with return receipt requested, or by express courier delivery or personal delivery to the addressee. Notice mailed by U.S. mail shall be effective only if and when received at the addressee's address. For purposes of notice, the addresses of the parties shall be as follows: RCTC: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Mailing Address: P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn: Executive Director CITY: CITY OF INDIO 100 Civic Center Mall Indio, CA 92201 Attn: City Manager Each party shall have the right to change its address for notice hereunder to any other location by the giving of notice to the other party in the manner set forth above. D. Applicable Law. This Agreement and all documents provided for herein shall be govemed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. E. Time. Time is of the essence in this Agreement, and each and every provision hereof in which time is an element. F. Amendment and Waiver. This Agreement and each provision hereof may be amended, changed, waived, discharged or terminated only by an instrument in writing signed by the parties hereto. G. Attorney's Fees. The prevailing party in any action arising out of this Agreement shall be entitled to its actual attorney's fees and other related expenses actually incurred. H. Severability. The invalidity and unenforceability of any one . or more provisions of this Agreement will in no way 'affect any other provision. I. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in three or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. J. Headings. The various headings used in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement or any provision hereof. K. Further Assurances. At any time or from time to time upon the request of RCTC, the City will execute and deliver such further documents and do other acts and things as RCTC may reasonably request in order to effect fully the purposes of this Agreement, 11 7of8 and any other Advances Documents and to provide for the payment of the Advances and interest thereon in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executedthe Agreement on the date . first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY CITY OF INDIO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION . By: By: Robin Lowe, Chair Mayor REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED ATTEST: FOR APPROVAL: By: By: Eric Haley, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP, Counsel Riverside County Transportation Commission City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM By: , City Attorney 8of8 12 Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit 13 List Description of Project Lease/Lease-Back Agreement Commission Policies Procedures for Submittal, Consideration and Payment of Invoices EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT [ATTACHED BEHIND THIS PAGE] A-1 14 6 Avenue 44 Rubidoux 111=113 MEI 10 MEI MEI ®®t min ®1:1==IIMIU Avenue 42 Avenue 44 Avenue 44 Avenue 45 Avenue 45 Avenue 48 Avenue 49 Avenue 50 Aztec St Shields Rd Monroe St Hwy 111 Avenue 48 1320 e/o Golf Ctr Fred Warin. Dr Golf Center Pkw 1000' w/o Jackson Madison St 900' e/o Korth St Monroe St Jefferson St 18 MEI 20 MG NEM MEI Calhoun St Civic Center Mall Clinton St Dale Ave 28 Fred Warin. Dr Golf Center Pkw Kenner Las Palmas Rd Madison St Madison St Market St Plaice Ave Rubidoux Denver Ave 1=11=111111 Jackson St All Amer. Canal Indio S. rin. s Dr Avenue 50 Avenue 44 1000's/o Indio BI ZEIZIEMINI Avenue 44 Rubidoux St John Robles. Ave 1320 e/o Goff Ctr Monroe St Monroe St Oasis St Requa St Dr. Carreon Blvd Monroe St Dillon Road Indio Blvd Dillon Road Jackson St Monroe St Jackson St Madison St 1-10 Interchan.e Dr. Carreon Blvd Calhoun St Madison St Avenue 44 Avenue 49 Jackson St Monroe St Indio Blvd 1200' e% Ave 44 Arabia St Hwy 111 MAUI 7,980 3,960 1,100 52800 228,800 250,800 tt 182,160 60,720 82.90 31.43 40.00 46.00 55.20 Oveda Overia $2.75 $2.75 13M'� I=' Overlay $2.75 $2.75 2,640 9,580 880 10.270 1.000 5.280 3080 5,280 5280 1,820 1.470 1,450 5,160 900 490 2,640 4,790 98 000 490 MED= tt 1,320 105,600 281,600 40,480 122,145 79,200 316,800 43000 105,600 105600 52,800 60,720 84,480 221,760 197,120 58 080 60,720 52,800 297,480 60,720 79,200 79,200 55,200 64,000 84,480 40.00 29.39 Pulverize 232171111 46.00 11.89 79.20 60.00 Pulverize Pulverize Pulverize Pulverize MEZIGESEIMMI 12==1=11:110:11WEIEEI EINEM 20.00 20.00 29.01 41.31 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $ 145,200 $ 629,200. $ 689,700 $ 580,800 $ 500,940 $ 166,980 $ 485,760 $ 422,400 $ 1,126,400 $ 161,920 $ 488,580 $ 316,8D0 $ 1,267,200 $ 172,000 $- 422,400 $ 422,400 Pulverize MELEEIGIMMI 42.98 59.55 64.53 20.00 61.96 161.63 46.00 64.00 Pulverize Pulverize Pulverize Pulverize $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4,00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $ 242 880 $ 887,040 $ 788,480 $ 232,320 $ 242,880 $ 211,200 $ 989,920 $ 242 880 $ 316,800 $ 316,800 $ 220,800 $ 256,000 $ 337,920. A-2 15 EXHIBIT `B" Recording requested by and return to: CITY OF LEASE/LEASE-BACK AGREEMENT by and between ' CITY OF and RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Relating to the Advance of 2009 Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Funds Dated as of , 2005 THIS TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX PURSUANT TO SECTION 11929 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. THIS DOCUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PURSUANT TO SECTION 27383 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE. 16 " LEASE/LEASE-BACK AGREEMENT This Lease/Lease-Back Agreement (this "Lease") executed and entered .into as of 2005, is by and between the CITY OF (the "City"), a municipal corporation, duly organized and validly existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California, and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (the "RCTC"), a public agency, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City and RCTC have entered into the Agreement for Advance of 2009 Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Funds dated as of , 2005 (the "Advance Agreement") for the purpose of obtaining an advance of certain funds to be received by RCTC on behalf of the City in connection with 2009 Measure "A" Funds (as defined in the Advance Agreement); and WHEREAS, the Advance Agreement requires that the City repay any. Advance (as defined in the Advance Agreement) by pledging the City's Local Streets and Roads Funding as defined in the Advance Agreement); and WHEREAS, the Advance Agreement further requires that the City provide additional security to secure repayment in the event Local Streets and Roads Funding are insufficient to repay in full the City's Advance as it becomes duei'and payable; and WHEREAS, to provide for such additionallsecurity the City desires to enter into this Lease/Lease-Back Agreement between the City and RCTC, pursuant to which the City will lease to RCTC and RCTC will lease back to the City certain property more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, all acts, conditions and thingsirequired by law to exist, to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and in connection with the execution and entering into of this Lease do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due time, form and manner as required by law, and the parties hereto are now duly authorized to execute and enter into this Lease Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained; the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.01. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section 1.01 shall, for all purposes of this 'Lease Agreement, have the meanings herein specified or in the Advance Agreement, which meanings shall be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of any of the terms herein defined. Additional Rental Payments. The term "Additional Rental Payments" means all amounts payable by the City as Additional Rental Payments pursuant to Section3.02 hereof. 171 1 Advance. The term "Advance" shall have the meaning given to such term in the Advance Agreement which defines the term as $4,000,000. Advance Agreement. The term "Advance Agreement' means the Agreement for Advance of 2009 Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Funds dated as of 2005 between the City and RCTC and any amendments thereto. Advance Repayment. The term "Advance Repayment' or "Advance Repayments" means payment or payments as required to be paid by the City under Section 3.1 the Advance Agreement, as a regularly scheduled payments. Base Rental Payment Date. The term "Base Rental Payment Date" means the dates upon which the City is required to make Advance. Repayments under the Advance Agreement. Base Rental Payments. The tern "Base Rental Payments" means all amounts payable to RCTC from the City as Base Rental Payments pursuant to Section 3.01 hereof. Commencement Date. The term "Commencement Date" means the date of recordation of this Lease Agreement in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside, State of California. Local Streets and Roads Funding. The term "Local Streets and Roads Funding" shall have the meaning given to such term in the Advance Agreement. Independent Financial Consultant. The term "Independent Financial Consultant' means a financial consultant or firm of such consultants generally recognized to be well qualified in the financial consulting field, appointed and paid by the City and who, or each of whom: (1) is in fact independent and not under the domination of the City; (2) does not have any substantial interest, direct or indirect, with the City; and (3) is not connected with the City as a member; officer or employee of the City, but who may be regularly retained to make annual or other reports to the City. Independent Insurance Consultant. The term "Independent Insurance Consultant" means a nationally recognized independent actuary, insurance company or broker that hasactuarial personnel experienced in the area of insurance for which the City is to be self -insured, as may from time to time be designated by RCTC. Lease or Lease Agreement. The term "Lease" or "Lease Agreement' means this Lease/Lease-Back Agreement and any amendment or supplement hereto. Net Proceeds. The term "Net Proceeds" means any insurance proceeds or condemnation award in excess of $50,000, .paid with respect to any of the Property, remaining after payment therefrom of all expenses incurred in the collection thereof Permitted Encumbrances. The term "Permitted Encumbrances" means, with respect to a Parcel, as of any particular time: (i) liens for general ad valorem taxes and assessments, if any, not then delinquent, or which the City may, pursuant to provisions of Article V hereof, permit to remain unpaid; (ii) this Lease Agreement; (iii) any right or claim of any mechanic, laborer, 2 18 materialman, supplier or vendor not filed or perfected in the manner prescribed by law; (iv) easements, rights of way, mineral rights, drilling rights and other rights, reservations, covenants, conditions or restrictions which exist of record as of the date of recording of this Lease Agreement; and (v) easements, rights of way, mineral rights, drilling rights and other rights, reservations, covenants, conditions or restrictions established following the date of recordation of this Lease Agreement and to which RCTC and the, City consent in writing. Property. The term "Property" means those certain parcels of real property situated in the. City, including all existing facilities and improvements located thereon, which are more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto, including any other parcels of real property substituted therefor, to the extent permitted by Section 8.07 hereof. Rental Period. The term "Rental Period" means the twelve-month period commencing on the Commencement Date and on each anniversary of the Commencement Date during the term of the Lease. Termination Date. The tern "Termination Advance has been repaid in full. Date" means the date upon which the ARTICLE II LEASE AND LEASE -SACK OF PROPERTY; TERM Section 2.01. Lease. The City hereby leases to RCTC and RCTC hereby leases from the City the Property, and all existing facilities and improvements located thereon, to have and to hold for the Term of this Lease. RCTC shall pay to the City as and for rental hereunder the sum of $1.00, and other good and valuable consideration, on or before the date of commencement of the term of this Lease. Such amount shall constitute prepayment in full of all rental payable by RCTC hereunder. Section 2.02. Lease -Back. RCTC hereby leases -back to the City and the City hereby leases from RCTC the Property, on the terms andl, conditions hereinafter set forth, and subject to all easements, encumbrances and restrictions that existed as of the Commencement Date. The leasing to the City from RCTC of the Property shall not effect or result in a merger of the City's leasehold estate pursuant to this Lease Agreement with its fee estate as lessor hereunder, and RCTC shall continue to have and hold a leasehold estate in the Property pursuant to the terms hereof throughout the term hereof. As to the Property, this Section 2.02 shall be deemed and constitute a "sublease. Section 2.03. Term: Occupancy. (a) Term. The term of this Lease Agreement shall commence on the Commencement Date, and shall end on the Termination Date. (b) Occupancy. The City agrees to take possession of the Property on the Commencement Date. The City shall only use and occupy the Property for public purposes. 19 ARTICLE III RENTAL PAYMENTS Section 3.01. Base Rental Payments: (a) In General. .Subject to the provisions of Sections 3.05 and. 7.02 hereof, the City - shall pay on each Base Rental Payment Date to RCTC as Base Rental Payments an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the amount payable as an Advance Repayment on the immediately preceding payment date andthe amount of Local Streets and Roads Funding actually applied by RCTC to repay the Advance pursuant to Section 3.2.A: ofthe Advance Agreement . In the event Local Streets and Roads Funding is sufficient to make all required - - Advance Repayments on any date when such payments are due, the City shall_ have no obligation to make any Base Rental Payments hereunder on such dates. Base Rental Payments -shall have principal and interest'components which correspond to the principal and interest components of payments made under the Advance Agreement. The interest -components of the Base Rental Payments shall be paid by the City as and constitute interest paid oil the principal components. of the Base Rental Payments to be paid by the City hereunder. The obligation of the City to make the Base Rental Payments does not constitute a debt of the City or of the State of California or of any political subdivision thereof within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limit or restriction, and does not constitute an obligation for which the City or the State of California is obligated to levy or pledge any form of taxation or for which the City or the State of California has levied or pledged any. form of taxation. (b) Maximum Rent: Rental Period. All Base Rental Payments made pursuant to this Section 3.01, together with any Additional Rental paid pursuant to Section 3.02 hereof, for each Rental Period shall riot exceed the fair -rental value of the Property. The aggregate annual Base Rental Payments for the Property shall be for the use of the Property during the Rental Period, or portion thereof, in which such payment is scheduled to be made. Section 3.02. Additional Rental Payments. The City shall also, pay, as Additional Rental Payments hereunder in addition to the foregoing Base Rental Payments, such amounts as shall be required for the payment of the following: (a) All taxes, assessments of any type or nature charged to RCTC or the City or affecting the Property or the respective interests or estates of RCTC or the City therein, or affecting the amount available to RCTC from rentals received hereunder (including taxes or assessments assessed or levied by any governmental agency or district having power to levy taxes or assessments). , (b) Insurance premiums for all insurance required pursuant to Article V of this Lease. Amounts constituting Additional Rental Payments payable hereunder shall be paid by the City directly to the person or persons to whom such amounts shall be payable. The City shall pay all such amounts when due or at such later time as such amounts may be paid without penalty or, in any other case, within sixty (60) days after notice in writing from the Fiscal Agent or RCTC to the City stating the amount of Additional Rental Payments then due and payable and 4. 20 i the purpose thereof. Section 3.03. Fair Rental Value. Such payments of the foregoing Base Rental Payments and Additional Rental Payments for the Property during each Rental Period, during .the term of this Lease Agreement, shall constitute the total rental for said Rental Period. The parties hereto have agreed and determined that the fair rental value of the Property is not less than the Advance Repayments in any given year during the Term hereof. In making such determination of fair rental value, consideration has been given to .the 'appraised value of the Property, the estimated costs of financing the acquisition of property comparable to the Property, the uses and purposes which may be served by the Property and the benefits therefrom which will accrue to the City and the general public. Said total rental shall be paid for and in consideration of the use and occupancy of the Property and in consideration of the continued quiet use and enjoyment thereof during each Rental Period for which said rental is to be paid. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Lease Agreement, in the event that rental payments due hereunder shall be partially abated for any period of time, the rental payments due for such period of time shall not exceed the fair rental value of that portion of the Property available for use and occupancy by the City during such period of time. I Section 3.04. Payment Provisions. Each' installment of Base Rental Payments payable hereunder shall be paid in lawful money of the United States of America to or upon the order of ROTC, or to its assigns, or such other place as RCTC or its assigns shall designate. Each Base Rental Payment shall be made no later than the Base Rental Payment Date on which such Base Rental Payment is due. Notwithstanding any dispute between RCTC and the City, the City shall make all rental payments when due without deduction or offset of any kind and shall not withhold any rental payments pending the final resolution of such dispute. In the event of a determination that the City was not liable for said rental payments or any.portion thereof, said payments or excess of payments, as the case maybe, shall be credited against subsequent rental payments due hereunder or refunded at the time of such determination. Section 3.05. Rental Abatement. Except as otherwise 'specifically provided in this Section 3.05 and Section 7.01 hereof, during any Period in which, by reason of material. damage or destruction there is substantial interference with the use and occupancy by the City of any portion of the Property, rentalpayments due hereunder' shall be abated proportionately, and the City waives the benefits of Civil Code Sections 1932(1), 1932(2) and 1933(4) and any and all other rights to terminate the Lease by virtue of any such interference and the Lease shall continue in full force and effect. The amount of such abatement shall be agreed upon by the City and RCTC but, subject to Section 3.03 hereof, in no event shall the rental be less than the amount required for the payment of the principal and interest components of the Base Rental Payments, and the Additional Rental Payments, related thereto, as the same become due and payable. The City and RCTC shall calculate such abatement and shall prepare a certificate setting forth such calculation and the basis therefor. Such abatement shall continue for the period commencing with the date of such damage or destruction and ending with the substantial completion of the work of repair or replacement of the Property so damaged or destroyed. 21 5 ARTICLE IV MAINTENANCE; ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS Section 4.01. Maintenance and Utilities. Throughout the term of this Lease Agreement; as part of the consideration for rental of the Property, all improvement, repair and maintenance of the Property shall be the responsibility of the City, and the City shall pay from sources other than from the Advance for or otherwise arrange for the payment of all utility services supplied to the Property, which may include, without limitation, janitor service, security, power; gas, telephone, light, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, water and all other utility services, and shall pay for or otherwise arrange for payment of the cost of the repair and replacement of the Property resulting from ordinary wear and tear or want of care on of the City or any assignee or sublessee thereof. In exchange for the rental herein provided, RCTC agrees to provide' only the Property. Section 4.02. Additions to Property. Subject to Section 8.02 hereof, the City and any sublessee shall, at its own expense, have the right to make additions, modifications .and improvements to any Property. All such additions, modifications and improvements shall thereafter comprise part of the Property and be subject to the provisions of this Lease Agreement. Such additions, modifications and. improvements shall not in any way damage the Property or cause it to be used for purposes other than those authorized under the provisions of state and federal law; and the Property, upon completion of any additions, modifications and improvements made pursuant to this Section, shall be of a value which is at least equal to the value of the Property immediately prior to the making of such additions,: modifications and improvements. Section 4.03. Installation of City's Equipment. The City and any sublessee may at any time and from time to time, in its sole discretion and at its own expense, install or permit to be installed items of equipment or other personal property in or. upon the Property: All such items shall remain the sole property of such party, in which RCTC shall have no interest, and may be modified or removed by such party at any time provided that such party shall repair and restore any and all damage to the Property resulting from the installation, modification or removal of any such items. Nothing in this Lease Agreement shall prevent the City and any sublessee from purchasing itemsto be installed pursuant to this Section under a conditional sale or lease purchase contract, or subject to a vendor's lien orsecurity agreement as security for the unpaid portion of the purchase price thereof, provided that no such lien or security interest shall attach to any part of the Property. ARTICLE V INSURANCE Section 5.01. Public Liability and Property DamageInsurance. The City shall maintain or cause to be maintained, throughout the term of this Lease Agreement, a standard comprehensive general liability insurance policy or policies in protection of the City and RCTC and their respective members, officers, agents and employees. Said policy or policies shall provide for indemnification of said parties against direct or contingent loss or liability for damages for bodily and personal injury, death or property damage occasioned by reason of the use or ownership of the Property. Said policy or policies shall provide coverage in the minimum liability limits of $1,000,000 for personal injury or death of each person and $3,000,000 for personal injury or deaths of two or more persons in a single accident or event, and in a minimum 6 22 " " amount of $500,000 for damage to property (subject to a deductible clause of not to exceed $200,000) resulting from a single accident or event. Such public liability and property damage insurance may, however, be in the form of a single limit policy in the amount. of $3,000,000 covering all such risks. Such liability insurance may be maintained as part of or in conjunction with any other liability insurance coverage carried or required to be carried by the City, and may be maintained in whole or in part in the form of self-insurance by the City provided such self-insurance complies with the provisions of Section 5.05 hereof. The Net Proceeds of such liability insurance shall be applied toward extinguishment or satisfaction of the. liability with respect to which the Net Proceeds of such insurance shall have been paid. Section 5.02. Title Insurance. The City shall. provide, at its own expense, one or more CLTA title insurance policies in form acceptable to RCTC in the aggregate amount of the principal amount of the Advance . Said policy or policies shall insure the City's leasehold estate hereunder in such Property subject only to Permitted Encumbrances. All Net Proceeds received under said policy or policies shall be used to make Advance Repayments ; provided, however, that any amounts in excess of amounts necessary to make all Advance Repayments shall be retained by the City. Prior to the Termination Date, each policy of title insurance obtained pursuant hereto or required hereby shall provide that all proceeds thereunder shall be payable to RCTC or its assigns. Section 5.03. Fire and Extended Coverage Insurance. The City shall procure and maintain, or cause to be procured and maintainedjthroughout the term of this Lease Agreement insurance against loss or damage to any structures constituting any part of the Property by fire and lightning, with extended coverage insurance and vandalism and .malicious mischief insurance. A maximum deductible amount of $100,000 for any one loss shall be allowable.. Such insurance shall be in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the replacement cost of the damaged Property. Such insurance may be maintained as part of or in conjunction with any other fire and extended coverage insurance carried or required to be carried by the City, and may be maintained in the form of self-insurance by the City. Section 5.04..Additional Insurance Provision: Form of Policies._ The City shall pay or cause to be paid when due the premiums for all insurance policies required by Section 5.01 of this Lease, and shall promptly furnish or cause to be furnished evidence of such payments to RCTC. - All such policies shall provide that RCTC shall be given thirty (30) days notice of the expiration thereof, any intended cancellation thereof or reduction of the coverage provided thereby. Section 5.05. Self -Insurance. Any self-insurance maintained by the City pursuant to this Article V shall comply with the following terms: (i) The self-insurance program shall, in the judgment of an Independent Insurance Consultant, include an actuarially sound claims reserve fund out of which each self -insured claim shall be paid; the adequacy of each such fund shall be. evaluated on an annual basis by the Independent Insurance Consultant; and any deficiencies in any self - insured claims fund shall be remedied in accordance with the recommendation of the aforementioned Independent Insurance Consultant; (ii) The self -insured claims fund shall be held in a separate trust fund by an independent trustee; and 23 7 I (iii) In the event the self-insurance program shall be discontinued, the actuarial soundness of its claims reserve fund, as determined by the Independent Insurance Consultant shall, be maintained. Section 5.06. Rental Interruption Insurance. The City shall procure and maintain through the Termination Date rental interruption or use and occupancy insurance, if commercially available, to cover loss, total or partial, of the use of any part of the Facilities during the Term of the Lease Agreement as a result of any of the hazards covered in the maximum remaining scheduled Lease Payments in any future 18 month. period payable by the City. The Net Proceeds of such insurance shall be paid to RCTC, and shall be credited towards the payment of the Lease Payments in the order in which such Lease Payments come due and payable. • ARTICLE VI DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES Section 6.01. Defaults and Remedies. (a) Defaults. If (i) the City shall fail to pay any Base Rental Payment required to be paid hereunder when the same becomes due and payable, (ii) the City shall fail to pay any item of Additional Rental as and when the same shall become due and payable hereunder, or (iii) the City shall breach any other terms, covenants or conditions contained herein, and shall fail to remedy any such breach with all reasonable dispatch within a period of 30 days after written notice thereof from RCTC, or its assignee, to the City, or, if such breach cannot be remedied within such 30 day period, shall fail to institute corrective action within such 30 day period and diligently pursue the same to completion, then and in any such event the City shall be deemed to be in default hereunder. (b) Remedies. If the City shall be in default hereunder, RCTC' shall have the right, at its option, without any further demand or notice, so long as RCTC does not terminate this Lease or the City's right to possession of the Property, to enforce all of its rights and remedies under this Lease Agreement, including the right to recover Base Rental Payments as they become due under this Lease Agreement, pursuant to Section 1951.4 of the Civil Code of the State, by pursuing any remedy available at law or in equity, except as otherwise expressly provide herein. Each and all of the remedies given to RCTC hereunder or by any law now or hereafter enacted are cumulative and the single or partial exercise of any right, power or privilege hereunder shall not impair the right of RCTC to other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any or all other rights, powers or privileges. If any statute or rule of law validly shall limit the remedies given to RCTC hereunder, RCTC nevertheless shall be entitled to whatever remedies are allowable under any statute or rule of law. (c) Attorney's Fees. In the event either RCTC or the City shall prevail in any action brought to enforce any of the terms and provisions of this Lease Agreement, such prevailing . party may recover from the losing party a reasonable amount as and for attorney's fees incurred in attempting to enforce any of the terms and provisions hereof. (d) Waiver. Failure of RCTC to take advantage of any default on the part of the City shall not be, or be construed as, a waiver thereof, nor shall any custom or practice which may grow up between the parties in the course of administering this instrument be construed to waive or to lessen the right of RCTC to insist upon performance by the City of any term, covenant or 8 24 " " condition hereof, or to exercise any rights given RCTC on account of such default. A waiver of a particular default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of the same or any subsequent default. The acceptance of rent hereunder shall not be, or be construed to be, a waiver of any term, covenant or condition of this Lease Agreement. ARTICLE VII EMINENT DOMAIN; PREPAYMENT Section 7.01. Eminent Domain. If all of the Property (or portions thereof such that the remainder is not usable for public purposes by !the City) shall be taken under the power of eminent domain, the term hereof shall cease as of the day that possession shall be so taken. If less than all of the Property shall be taken under the power of eminent domain and the remainder is usable for public purposes by the City at the time of such taking, then the Lease Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as to such remainder, and the parties waive the benefits of any law to the contrary, and in such event there shall be a partial abatement of the rental due hereunder in an amount to be agreed upon by the City and RCTC but, subject to Section 3.03 hereof, in no event shall the rental be less than! the amount required for the payment of the principal, and interest components of the Base Rental Payments, and the Additional Rental Payments, as the same become due and payable. Prior to the Termination Date, any awardMade in eminent domain proceedings for the taking of the Property, or any portion thereof, shall be applied to the payment of Advance Repayments. Any amount of the award in excess of the amount needed to pay all Advance Repayments and any such award made after all of the Base Rental Payments have been fully paid or provision) therefor made, shall be paid to the City. Section 7.02. Prepayment. The City may prepay, from any source of available funds, all or any portion of the Base Rental Payments becoming due hereunder to the same extent as the Advance is subject to prepayment. ARTICLE VIII COVENANTS Section 8.01. Right of Entry. RCTC and its assignees shall have the right to enter upon and to examine and inspect the Property during reasonable business hours (and in emergencies at all times) for any purpose connected with RCTC's rights or obligations under this Lease Agreement, and for all other lawful purposes. Section 8.02. Liens. In the event the City shall at any time during the term of this Lease Agreement cause any changes, alterations, additions, improvements, or other work to be done or performed or materials to be supplied, in or upon the Property,. the City shall pay, when due, all sums of money that may become due for, or purporting to be for, any labor, services, materials, supplies or equipment furnished or alleged to have been furnished to or for the City in, upon or about the Property .and which may be secured by a mechanics', materialmen's or other lien against the Property or RCTC's interest therein and will cause :each such lien to be fully discharged and released at the time the performance of any obligation secured by any such lien matures or becomes due, except that, if the City desires to contest any such lien, it may do so. If any such lien shall be reduced to final judgment and such judgment or such process as may be issued for the enforcement thereof is not promptly stayed, or if so stayed and said stay thereafter expires, the City shall forthwith pay and discharge said judgment. 25 9 Section 8.03. Quiet Enjoyment. The parties hereto mutually covenant that the City, by keeping and performing the covenants and agreements herein contained, shall at all times during the term of this Lease Agreement peaceably and quietly have; hold and enjoy the Property without suit, trouble or hindrance from ROTC. Section 8.04. Authority Not Liable. RCTC and its members, officers; agents and employees, shall not be liable to the City or to any other party whomsoever for any death, injury or damage that may result to any person or property by or from any cause whatsoever in, on or about the Property. The City shall indemnify and hold RCTC, its members, officers, agents and employees, harmless from, and defend each of them against, any and all claims, liens and judgments arising from the use of the Property, including, without limitation; death of or injury to any person or damage to property whatsoever occurring in, on or about the Property regardless of responsibility for negligence, but excepting the negligence or willful misconduct of the person or entity seeking indemnity. Section 8.05. Assignment and Subleasing. Neither this Lease Agreement nor any interest of the City hereunder shall be mortgaged, pledged, assigned, or transferred by the City by voluntary act or by operation by law or otherwise, except with the prior written consent of RCTC, which 'shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Property may not be subleased in whole or in part by the City without the prior written consent of RCTC. Any such sublease shall be subject to all of the following conditions: (i) This Lease Agreement and the obligation of the City to make all rental payments hereunder shall remain obligations of the City; (ii) The City shall, within thirty (30) days after the delivery thereof, furnish or cause to be furnished to RCTC a true and complete copy of such sublease; and (iii) No such sublease by the City shall cause the Property to be used for a purpose other than a governmental or proprietary function authorized under the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of California. Section 8.06. Title to Property. During the term of this Lease Agreement;' RCTC shall have a leasehold. interest in the Property and any and all additions which comprise fixtures, repairs, replacements or modifications thereof, except for those fixtures, repairs, replacements or modifications which are added thereto by the City and which maybe removed without damaging the Property, and except for any items added to the Property by the City pursuant to 'Section 4.03 hereof. Upon the termination or expiration of this Lease Agreement with respect to the Property, or any portion thereof; (other than as provided in Section 6.01 and 7.01 of this Lease Agreement), all right, title and interest in and to the Property; or such portion thereof, shall vest in the City. Upon any such termination or expiration, RCTC shall execute such conveyances, deeds and other documents as may necessary to affect such vesting of record: Section 807. Release and Substitution' of Property. This Lease Agreement may be modified or amended at any time; if such amendment is to modify or amend the description of the Property in order to release some or all of the real property constituting the "Property from the 10 26 " Lease Agreement, to substitute other real property for such real property constituting said portion of the Property, provided that the City shall have filed with RCTC all of the following: (a) Executed copies of this Lease Agreement or amendments thereto containing the amended legal description of the Property; (b) Evidence satisfactory to RCTC that copies of this. Lease Agreement or amendments thereto containing the amended legal description of the Property have been - duly recorded in the official records of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside; (c) A certificate of the City, accompanied by evidence satisfactory to ROTC, evidencing that the annual fair rental value of the property which will constitute the Property after such release and substitutiorilr will be at least equal to the fair rental 'value of the Property before such release and substitution; (d) A CLTA leasehold owner'sll policy or an amendment or endorsement to an existing .policy, resulting in title insurance with respect to the Property after such substitution in an amount at least equal to the amount of such insurance provided with respect to the Property prior to such substitution; each such insurance instrument, when issued, shall name RCTC or its assigns as the insured, and shall insure the leasehold estate of the City in such substituted property, subject only to such exceptions as do not substantially interfere with the City's right to use and occupy such substituted property and as will not result in an abatement of Base Rental Payments payable by the City under this Lease Agreement; and (e) An opinion of counsel stating that such amendment or modification (i) is authorized or permitted by the Constitution and laws of the State of California and this Lease Agreement; (ii) complies with the terms of the Constitution and laws of the State of California and of this Lease Agreement; and (iii) will, upon the execution and delivery thereof, be valid and binding upon RCTC and the City in accordance with its terms. Section 8.08. Advance. (a) Private Activity Bond Limitation. The City shall assure that the proceeds of the Advance are not used as to cause the Bonds to satisfy the private business tests of Section 141(b) of the Tax Code or the private loan financing test of Section 141(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Tax Code"). (b) Maintenance of Tax Exemption. The City shall take all actions as necessary as directed by RCTC to assure the exclusion of interest on any tax-exempt obligations of RCTC which are the source of the funding the Advance. Section 8.09. No Purchase of RCTC Obligations. The City agrees that it will not purchase any tax-exempt obligations of RCTC the proceedsof which were used to provide any of the funds for the Advance. 27 11 ARTICLE IX NO CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES; USE OF THE PROPERTY Section 9.01. No Consequential Damages. In no event shall RCTC be liable for any incidental, indirect, special or consequential damage in connection with or arising out of this Lease Agreement or the City's use of the Property. Section 9.02. Use of the Property. The City will not use, operate or maintain the Property improperly, carelessly, in violation of any applicable law or in a manner contrary to that contemplated by this Lease Agreement. 'In addition, the City agrees to comply in all respects .(including, without limitation, with respect to the use, maintenance and operation of the Property) with all laws of the jurisdictions in which its operations may extend and any legislative, executive, administrative or judicial body exercising any power or jurisdiction over the Property; provided, however, that the City may contest in good faith the validity or application of any such law or rule in any reasonable manner which does not, in the opinion of RCTC, adversely affect the estate of RCTC in and to any of the Property or its interest or rights under this Lease Agreement.. ARTICLE X MISCELLANEOUS Section 10.01. Law Governing. THIS LEASE AGREEMENTSHALL BE GOVERNED EXCLUSIVELY BY THE PROVISIONS HEREOF AND BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS THE SAME FROM TIME TO TIME EXIST. Section 10.02. Notices. All notices, statements demands, consents, approvals, authorizations, offers, designations, requests, agreements or promises or other communications hereunder by either party to the other shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given and served upon the other party if delivered personally or if mailed by United States registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid: If to the City: If to RCTC: City of Indio 100 Civic Center Drive Indio, CA 92201 Attn: Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attention: Chief Financial Officer or to..such ,other addressees as the respective parties may from time -to -time designate by notice in writing. A copy of any such notice or other document herein referred to shall also be delivered to the Fiscal Agent. Section 10.03. Validity and Severability. If for any reason this Lease Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be void, voidable, or unenforceable by RCTC or by the City, or if for any reason it is held by such a court that any of the covenants and conditions of 12 28 the City hereunder, including the covenant to pay rentals hereunder, is unenforceable for the full term hereof, then and in such event this Lease Agreement is and shall be deemed to be a Lease Agreement under which the rentals are to be paid by the City annually in consideration of the right of the City to possess, occupy and use the Property, and all of the rental and other terms, provisions and conditions of this Lease Agreement, except to the extent that such terms, provisions and conditions are contrary to or inconsistent with such holding, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 10.04. Net -Net -Net Lease. This Lease Agreement shall be deemed and construed to be a "net -net -net lease" and the City hereby agrees that the rentals provided for herein shall be an absolute net retum to RCTC, free and clear of any expenses, charges or set -offs whatsoever and notwithstanding any dispute between the City and RCTC. Section 10.05. Taxes. The City shall pay or cause to be paid all taxes and assessments of any type or nature charged to RCTC or affecting the Property or the respective interests or estates therein; provided that with respect to special assessments or other governmental charges that may lawfully be paid in installments over a period of years, the City shall be obligated to pay only such installments as are required to be paid during the term of this Lease Agreement as and when the same become due. The City or any sublessee may, at the City"s or such sublessee's expense and in its name, in good faith contest any such taxes, assessments, utility and other charges and, in the event of any such contest, may permit the taxes, assessments or other charges so contested to remain unpaid during the period of such contest and any appeal therefrom unless RCTC or the Fiscal Agent shall notify the City or such sublessee that, in the opinion of independent counsel, by nonpayment of any such items, the interest of RCTC in the Property will be materially endangered or the Property, or any part thereof, will be subject to loss or forfeiture, in which event the City or such sublessee shall promptly pay such taxes, assessments or charges or provide RCTC with full security against any loss which may result from nonpayment, in form satisfactory to RCTC. Section 10.06. Headings. All section headings contained herein are for convenience of reference only and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Lease Agreement. Section 10.07. Amendments. This Lease Agreement and any Ground Lease may be amended in writing as may be mutually agreed by RCTC and the City. Section 10.08. Execution. This Lease Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all together shall constitute but one and the same Lease Agreement. It is also agreed that separate counterparts of this Lease Agreement may separately be executed by RCTC and the City, all with the same force and effect as though the same counterpart had been executed by both RCTC and the City. 13 29 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, RCTC and the City have caused this Lease Agreement to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, all as of the day and year first above written. (Seal) Attest: City Clerk (Seal) Attest: Secretary CITY OF By: , Mayor RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: Executive Director 14 30 EXHIBIT "C" COMMISSI014 POLICIES 1. Local agencies are required to submit Five Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) to RCTC in order to qualify for Measure "A" Streets and Roads. funds. In order to be eligible to receive monthly disbursements of funding beginning at the start of a fiscal year, agencies are required to submit their CIPs to RCTC no later than May 31 st The first year of an agency's annual CIP update will include a list of the specific projects planned to be constructed in that year including projects in Year 1 of the current CIP which will not be under contract by June 30`h of the current year. Year 1 of the CIP will also show expenses for multi -year projects which are expected to be spent for project development work. Projects to be. constructed in Years 2-5 of the CIP are to be listed along with their estimated costs. The specific year for construction may be included, if available, but is not required in the CIP. Costs for multiiyear projects, excluding project development costs shown in Year 1, are to be included in the list of Year 2-5 projects. 2. Cities not participating in the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program do not qualify to receive Measure "A" Streets and Roads allocations (2009 Measure «A„ 3. Local agencies which are entitled to 2 09 Measure "A" funding allocations must demonstrate that they continue to be committed to using their local discretionary funds for local streets and road improvement and maintenance. The local agencies must provide RCTC with an annual certification that the Measure "A" funds they are allocated will not replace existing local discretionary funds being used for local transportation purposes. RCTC cannot issue funds for a new fiscal year until it has received certification of maintenance of effort from the respective agencies. Calculations supporting the MOE certification may be noted by staff as preliminary pending adoption of the annual budget and completion of the annual audit. If Ithe audit or the budget process result in a significant modification to the MOE calculations of CIP, revisions are to be submitted to RCTC for processing. 31 EXHIBIT "D" PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL, CONSIDERATION AND PAYMENT OF INVOICES . 1. Each month the City shall submit an invoice for eligible Project costs incurred during the preceding month. The original invoice shall be submitted to RCTC's Executive Director with a copy to RCTC's Project Coordinator. Each invoice shall be accompanied by a cover letter in a format substantially similar to that of Exhibit "D-1". 2. Each invoice shall include documentation from each contractor used by the City for the Project, listing labor costs, subcontractor costs, and other expenses. Each invoice shall also include a monthly progress report and spreadsheets showing the hours or amounts expended by each contractor or Contractor for the month and for the entire Project to date. Samples of acceptable task level documentation and progress reports are attached as Exhibits "D-2" and "D-3". . 3. Charges for each task and milestone listed invoice. in Exhibit "A shall be listed separately in the 4. Each invoice shall include a certification signed by the City Representative or his or her designee which reads as follows: "I hereby certify that the hours and salary rates submitted for reimbursement in this invoice are the actual hours and rates worked and paid to the contractors or contractors listed. Signed Title Date Invoice No. 5. RCTC will pay the City within 30 days after receipt by the Commission of an invoice. If RCTC disputes any portion of an invoice, payment for that portion will be withheld, without interest, pending resolution of the dispute, but the uncontested balance will be paid. 32 EXHIBIT D-1 Sample Cover Letter to RCTC Date Mr. Eric Haley Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, CA 92501 ATTN: Accounts Payable Re: Project Title - Invoice # Enclosed for your review and payment approval is the City's invoice for professional and technical services that was rendered by our contractors in connection with the 2009 Measure"A" Local Streets and Roads Funding per Agreement No. effective (Month/Day/Year) The required support documentation received from each contractor is included as backup to the invoice. Invoice period covered is from Month/Date/Yea Total Authorized Agreement Amount: Total Invoiced to Date: Total Previously Invoiced: Balance Remaining: Amount due this Invoice: to Month/Date/Year $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 I certify that the hours and salary rates charged in this invoice are the actual hours and rates worked and paid to the contractors listed. By: Name Title cc: 33 EXHIBIT D-2 SAMPLE TASK SUMMARY SCHEDULE 34 " EXHIBIT D-3 Sample Progress Report REPORTING PERIOD: Month/Date/Year to PROGRESS REPORT: #1 Month/Date/Year A. Activities and Work Completed during Current Work Periods TASK 01  100% PS&E SUBMITTAL 1. Responded to Segment 1 comment; 2. Completed and submitted Segment from Department of Transportation 1 final PS&E B. Current/Potential Problems Encountered & Corrective Action Problems None C. Work Planned Next Period Corrective Action None TASK 01  100% PS&E SUBMITTAL 1. Completing and to submit Traffic Signal and Electrical Design plans 2. Responding to review comments RVPUB\DAB \698320. I 35 AGENDA ITEM 7C RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Account ng Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Division Head, Programming and Administration SUBJECT: Interfund Loan Activity Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: and file the Interfund Loan Activity the Interfund Loan Policy and adopted the Riverside County Transportation The Commission requested that basis. The attached report details 31, 2005. The total outstanding are $575,000. This item is for the Commission to receive Report for the month ended August 31, 2005. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On April 14, 2004 the Commission approved Resolution No. 04-009 'Resolution of Commission to Authorize Interfund Loans". interfund loan activity be reported on a monthly all interfund loan activity through August interfund loan amounts as of August 31, 2005 Attachment: Interfund Loan Activity Repor Agenda Item 7C 36 Date of Loan April 2, 2003 March 4, 2004 Total Amount of Loan Maturity Date • Riverside County Transportation Commission Interfund Loan Activity Report For period ended August 31, 2005 Lending Fund Borrowing Fund $ 300,000 July 1, 2006 Measure A - WC Highway (222) Measure A - WC LSR (227) 275,000 $ 575,000 Purpose of Loan Advance to make repairs and improvements to Railroad Canyon Road July 1, 2009 Measure A - WC Commuter Measure A - WC Highway (222) Additional local match for the SR71 Assistance (226) Widening/Animal Crossing Project Date Commission Approved March 12, 2003 December 10, 2003 37 AGENDA ITEM 7D RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Cathy Becthel, Division Head, Planning SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Short Allocation of Local Transportation Transit Agency Range Transit Plan Amendment and Funds to Palo Verde Valley: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to amend Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency's Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) and allocate $34,142 in Local Transportation Funds for payment on a trolley purchase. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA) is requesting approval to amend its Short Range Transit Plan by requesting an allocation of $34,142 in Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for payment of a trolley that was obtained through a lease/purchase in FY 2004-05. In 2004, the PVVTA Board authorized $10,000 to lease the trolley with an option to purchase. In 2005, due to maintenance concerns and operational incompatibilities, PVVTA staff received board approval to return the trolley. At that time, PVVTA staff learned that the lease/purchase approved by the PVVTA Board in 2004, was instead a contractuallyobligated purchase of the vehicle. The original $10,000 payment was actually a deposit with two subsequent balloon payments due for a total purchase price of $137,600. PVVTA essentially had two options: 1) Purchase the trolley for a total of approximately $137,600, although experience demonstrated that PVVTA did not want the vehicle due to maintenance and operational issues, or 2) Purchase the trolley as contractually obligated, then immediately sell the trolley for an offered amount of $93,500, and seek an LTF allocation for the outstanding balance owed of $34,142. Agenda Item 7D 38 At PVVTA's September 7, 2005 meeting,. the Board voted on Option. 2; as a result, PVVTA is requesting $34,142 to cover the balance due. There is adequate LTF funding available in the Palo Verde Valley apportionment area to support this:. request. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N/A Year: FY 2005-06 Amount: $34,142 Source of Funds: Local Transportation Funds Budget Ad ustment: No GLA No.: 601-62-86102 Fiscal Procedures Approved` . q \� A 1' Date: 9/27/05 Agenda hem 7D 39 AGEND ITEM 7E " RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Cathy Becthel, Division Head, Planning SUBJECT: Western Riverside Measure "A" Specialized Transit Inland AIDS Project Programs STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Allocate $1 1,000 in Western Riverside Measure "A" Specialized Transit funding to Inland AIDS Project; and, 2) Approve Agreement No. 06-26-545, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 04-26-511, with Inland AIDS Project for provision of specialized transit services in Western Riverside County. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Through the Measure "A" Specialized Transit Program's call for projects, the Inland AIDS Project (IAP) was approved to receive $89,000 in Measure "A" Specialized Transit funding for FY 2005-06. IAP is requesting an additional $11,000 in funding due to a significant reduction in: Ryan White Title I funds as well as increases in fuel and vehicle maintenance costs. IAP has been a long time recipient of Western Riverside Measure "A" Specialized Transit funding for the provision of transportation services to persons with HIV/AIDS to medical, dental, social service, and other health related appointments. If approved for the additional funding, IAP projects that it will provide an additional 97 one-way passenger trips increasing their FY 2005-06 goal to 681 one-way trips for FY 2005-06. There is adequate Western Riverside Measure "A" funds available to support this request. Agenda Item 7E 40 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2005-06 Amount: $11,000 Source of Funds: Western Riverside Measure "A" Specialized Transit Funding Budget Ad ustment: Yes GLA No.: 225-26-86101 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \pa,u4,„t,1 Date: 9/22/05 Agenda Item 7E 41 " AGEND " " ITEM 7F RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Division Head Programming and Administration SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2006-20101 Improvement Plan for Local Cathedral City Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Streets and Roads for the City of STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 2006-2010 Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Cathedral City. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each ecipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive its Measure "A" disbursements. In addition, the cities in the Coachella Valley and the County (representing the unincorporated area of the Eastern County) must be participating in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are required to submit the annual certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. On March 31, ,2005, RCTC staff provided the local agencies with Measure "A" revenue projections for local streets and roads to assist them in preparation of the required Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The agencies were asked to submit their Plans by June 15, 2005 for submission to the Commission on July 13, 2005. At its July 13, 2005 meeting, the Commission approved the Plans for all but seven (7) cities, and on September 14, 2005 the Commission approved the Plans for two additional cities. Subsequently, we have received the required Plan, MOE certification and supporting documentation from the city of Cathedral City. The remaining four cities, Beaumont, Coachella, Indio and Norco, have been informed that no disbursement of Measure "A" funds for local streets and roads will be made until all of the required documents have been received and approved by the Commission. Attachment: Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for City of Cathedral City Agenda Item 7F 42 " August 29, 2005 Mr. Jerry Rivera, Program Manager RCTC 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside CA 92502 Ref: FY 2005-06 Maintenance of Effort Certification Dear Mr. Rivera; 73437 JR S?305N71:4107RERTASTID7061VCCOMC1111117VISSIO2N This is to certify that as of June 30, 2005, the City of Cathedral City will have expended an estimated $855,076 of Discretionary Funds on street and transportation related projects and activities. This amount exceeds our annual Maintenance of Effort (MOE) amount of $625,230 by $229,846_' Enclosed is a summary list of the FY 2004-05 expenditures and estimates, an executed "Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement", signed by the City Engineer, for the City of Cathedral City, our proposed Measure A Five Year Capital Expenditure program (CIP) for our use of Measure A local funds and our. Project Status Report. The City's Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) showing our projected use of Measure "A" funds, is submitted with the caveat that preparation of the City's own CIP for FY05-06 has begun but is not yet . completed, so there may be changes between what the City finally adopts and what is shown herein. Please review the enclosed, and if there a e any questions, please contact me at (760) 770-0347, or by fax at (760)202-1460, or by e-mail, at: Igrosjean@cathedralcity.gov. Yours ttul eslie Grosjean Development Project Manager cc: Don Bradley, City Manager William O. Bayne, City Engineer enclosures a�� 68-700 AVENIDA LALO GUERRERO " CATHEDRAL CIT 43 X.29.06 , CA 92234 " 760/770-0340 " FAX: 760/202-1460 " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A'�LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY2003 - 2006 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 4 Prepared by: Leslie Grosjean Administrative Analyst Phone #:760-770-0319 Date: June 9, 2005 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Public works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance 1,588.2 794.1 Operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy 2. Planning Departments Transportation,and 1,646.1 275.0 -Engineering,& -traffic related planning and development activities as well as Highway design and related engineering activities 3. Risk Management Traffic related claims management 4,657.3 84.9 4. Traffic Signal Maintenance Maintenance  traffic signal system 136.5 136.5 /rivera/ meaaureASyrform 44 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A''' LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY2005 - 2006 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 2 of 4 Prepared by: Leslie Grosjean, Administrative Analyst Phone ft: 760-770-0319 Date: June 9, 2005 Item No. Project Name / Limits Capital Projects Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 5. City-wide Re -striping Pavement striping and markings 110.0 94.1 6. Date Palm Project Pavement rehab/alignment studies 437.0 53.2 7. Perez Road Rehab. Pavement rehabilitation 1,246.0 197.8 8. Ramon Widening Widen e/o Date Palm 1,654.0 261.0 9. Victoria Dr. — Safe Routes to School Widen Date Palm/install 521.0 54.0 Pedestrian safety Improvements 10. Perez Road Sidewalk Sidewalk Extension & bus stop 97.8 20.0 11. PM-10 Mitigation Improvements Pave dirt roads/shoulders to reduce blow -sand 6.3 1.0 12. BCN-Hotel Infrastructure Infrastructure 3,533.0 895.5 Improvements @ hotel site rWera JmeaaureA5yrform 45 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A"LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY2005 - 2006 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 3 of 4 Prepared by: Lesiie GrosJean, Administrative Analyst Phone #:760-770-0319 Date: June 9 2005 Item No. Project Name / Limits Capital Projects Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($0001s) 13. 14. 15. Interim Traffic SignalI-10/Date Palm Drainage Basins 35th Avenue. Assessment District Reconstruct interchange Acquire/const. Retention basins Assessment district studies & Formation 710.0 75.0 6,664.0 4.1 23.4 169.3 16. Cove Area Assessment District Assessment district studies 32,830.5 48.0 & Formation 17. EPC Bridge Widening Design & construct widened bridge 1,980.0 194.6 18. Date Palm Median Islands Const/landscape median 21.7 2.1 Islands 19. Ramon Medians Const/landscape median 16.9 3.2 Islands h ivera! measureASyrfarm 46 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A' LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM. FY2005- 2006 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 4 of 4 Prepared by: Leslie Grosjean, Administrative Analyst Phone #:7150470-0319 Date: June 9, 2005 Item No. Project Name / Limits Capital Projects Project Type Total Cost ($000%) Measure A Funds ($0001s) 20. Misc. Street Projects Various small projects 133.4 52.6 21. Terrace Rd/Cove Drains Cove area storm drain project 2,115.4 37.1 22. Misc. Sidewalks Various sidewalk projects 61.0 6.9 23. Clean Streets Cleaning minor streets 237.0 42.0 Clean up for proposed 24, Eagle Canyon Clean Up flood control dam Const bridge to connect 3,375.0 9.0 25. Downtown Pedestrian Bridge Perez Rd to Civic Center 93.9 0.0 Upgrade and Improve traffic 26. Ramon Corridor corridor 502.7 8.3 27." Date Palm Whltewater Bridge Repair Repair existing Bridge 181.0 7.8 47 41) " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION -COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREET SAND ROADS PROGRAM FY1005 - 2006 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 4 of 4. Prepared by Leslie Grosjean, Administrative Analyst Phone *:760-770-0319 Date: 3une 9, 2005 Item No. Project Name / Limits Capital Projects Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 28. Maintenance District Set up landscape maintenance district 10.8 10.6 29. North of II-10 Infrastructure Study To develop long range fees for N. I-10 132.0 132.0 30. Shifting Sands Trail Sidewalk Extension Pedestrian, Sidewalk 142.1 40.0 31. G. Ford/Plumley Rd 161.0 11.0 32. Street Slurry 544.2 174.2 33. Dinah Shore  Syr CVAG Payback 157.8 31.6 34. Unidentified Projects  Pending City Council Approval 587.9 587.9 $66,366.5 S4A62.8 48 /rivers/ messureMyrform RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'AnLOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 1006 -1007 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: :Leslie Grosjean, Administrative Analyst Phone # 760-770-0319 Date: June 9, 2005 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($0001s) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide Maint. Ops 1,688.2 844.1 Including parking, median maintenance and street light energy Transportation and traffic 2. Engineering &Planning Departments related planning and development activities as well as Highway design and related engineering activities 1,728A 310.6 Traffic related claims 3. Risk Management management 4,890.2 95.9 Maintenance — traffic signal 4. Traffic Signal Maintenance system 136.5 136.5 Various traffic/ 5. Capital Improvement Projects transportation related projects $58.338.4 3.172.3 $66.781.7 $4.559.4 49 s f rivera/measureASyrrorm RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA7TON COMMISSION MEASURE 'A"LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY2007- 2008 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Leslie Grosjean, Administrative Analyst Phone #: 760-770-0319 Date: June 9, 2005 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) MeasureA Funds ($000's) 1. Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide Malnt. Ops including parking, median maintenance and street light energy 1,888.2 944.1 Transportation and traffic 2. Engineering & Planning Departments related planning and development activities as well as Highway design and related engineering activities 1,814.8 324.1 Traffic related claims 3. Risk Management management 5,134.7 100.1 Maintenance — traffic signal 4. Traffic Signal Maintenance system 336.5 136.5 Various traffic/ 5. Capital Improvement Projects transportation related projects $58.338.4 3.172.3 $6Z.312.5 $4.677.1 50 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREE75AND ROADS PROGRAM FY200B - 2009 Agency: City of Cathedral City; Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Leslie Grosjean, Administrative Analyst Phone it:760-770-0319; Date: June 9, 2005 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($0001s) 1. Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide Maint. Ops including parking, median maintenance and street light energy 2,0813.2 1,044.1 Transportation and traffic 2. Engineering & Planning Departments related planning and development activities as well as Highway design and related engineering activities 1,905.6 338.2 Traffic related claims 3. Risk Management management 5,391.4 104.5 Maintenance — traffic signal 4. Traffic Signal Maintenance system 136.5 136.5 Various traffic/ 5. Capital Improvement Projects transportation related projects S58.338.4 3.172.3 $67,13fin.0 $4,7951 1521RIVERSIDE COUNTS' TRANSPORTATION"COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY2009 - 2010 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Leslie Grosjean, Administrative Analyst Phone #:760-770-0319 Date: Tune 9, 2005 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Public Works Department &Parks Maintenance Citywide Malnt. Cps 2,100.00 1,050.0 Including parking, median maintenance and street light energy Transportation and traffic 2. Engineering & Planning Departments related planning and development activities as 2,000.9 352.7 Highway design -well as -and — related engineering activities Traffic related claims 3. Risk Management management 5,661.0 108.9 Maintenance — traffic signal 4. Traffic Signal Maintenance system 136.5 136.5 5. Capital Improvement Projects Various traffic/ transportation related projects $58.338.4 3.172.3 MALI Wald • /river./ meaeureA5yrform 52 AGENDA TEM 7G RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Claudia Chase, Property Agent Stephanie Wiggins, Rail Department Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Division Head, Programming and Administration SUBJECT: Surplus Madison Station Grounds STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Declare the property identified as the former Madison Station Grounds (4.15 acres) located on Railroad Avenue between Madison Street and Jefferson Avenue in Riverside; APN Nos. 230-233-013, 230-245-013, 230-245-015, 230-253-010 as surplus; and, 2) Authorize staff to initiate the sixty (60) day public agency notification period and, if no interest is expressed, authorize the Executive Director to offer the parcel for sale. BACKGROUND INFORMATION In March 1993, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, currently. known as the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF), sold various parcels of land along the San Bernardino and San Jacinto Subdivision corridors to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC). Various contracts, leases and licenses with individuals, corporations, political bodies, companies and public utilities authorizing their use or occupancy of Santa Fe property were assigned to RCTC as a result of this transaction. Included in the assignment is the property known as the former Madison Station Grounds. The Site is located on the southerly side of Railroad Avenue bound by Madison Street to the east and Jefferson Avenue to the west, in the westerly portion of the City of Riverside. The property is more specifically identified as the northwesterly 100 ft. of the 200 ft. wide right-of-way owned by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway and adjacent to the operating BNSF Railroad and Metrolink commuter rail lines. Agenda Item 7G 5 The subject site is zoned M-2 General Manufacturing. This zone is intended for general manufacturing and processing. With commercial uses in evidence along Madison Street, and according to the City of Riverside Planning Department, the Madison Street frontage of the subject site could be developed to a commercial use. The subject site consists of 4.15 acres of vacant land with overhead utility lines - running the length of the site. It is roughly level and at grade with Railroad Avenue, sloping slightly up near the operating railroad track bed. There are no site improvements. It is further identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 230-233-013, 230-245-013, 230-245-015, and 230-253-010. Staff has identified this property to be of no future use ,for RCTC and recommends the Commission surplus the property for sale. Attachment: Assessor's Maps Agenda Item 7G 54 • • • v b9/6 'W d uo/pppy sn/drns 96/P. '8W 10O41 00QO/8 DSDO 9'S /Z/6 9W uq//a604 g pun7 ap/sranN '8 W OL/! — I —SJ9.9 /./ Hiacri/fi/ . 03rVOVA J k 7Jnlvb'. IL 09 0., 95 a ,•�0 9/ 92, '� Lf a FF < FF 19.. * CD I £/ 'F/ // - © oO Q 97 gO - I b/ 0 0 0 0 ` � sa L•t6! 29F, bF' 2F' OF • 67: 2 A h O . �"0 SM ' .OS ,1 6/ FZ .Y -o� Sb6 nl e 7"6V lbO A Z/ O I ri'°9'i7! rfi, —'aci 6 747•69'0 9 O. L La/re 9-FF-b09a n 3'9'S NOd,: Oil l'B F su • r. O99 O LE b b. .fiI N 1. ,0 • CA192/ :9£1 — SOM117 % B'7.8) 30/5',11-1n k! d 0 41 /0 ViOd • 4Z nd D£Zwa dov S aosssgsv • =0,493. If/61 Stl 1 'h 9/ • sIs S/ r7YLrfl Z/ Al fI �^D i3 arot 0011,112 Q o g rLw;VI /ror. w a r roa as Ij s. a ,oF u .1001 1i/S J :7v re a b/ 1 .ere. 9- TNlS MAP IS rOR. ' Ass£SSMERr PURPOSES ONCY Pa/q(0T2 B6K 65.- N • POR. CITY OF RIVERSIDE (R.L. BL LANDS—Z3S. R.5W1 .M 425c= za "11 4 W/4,3TROA4 STREET + 1 QW a 3 0 Ex DM �#41 K.3 0.96 AC2' S m' O9TI: PJ YE/91 NS PO/es As rI/Pi car ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 230 PO. 24 RIVERS/OE cOUNTY, CAME 0 0.20AC.L .„ V V I Os' 2e 4I4A r ,n.. 11S.H as' 26 O h �,' _ 125 0.43AC.f V 0.32 AC. si 0.32A0 5_ ix..54' W 0 24 - 0.57AC. 3. I ;. _ 23 FOR PAR.7 55E 804-33-6 o9PP I- 93 4.93 I VACATED de' Oa /7 0.57 AG VACATED .T.r SEE 804-S5.6 vOR. PAR, 8 014 N0 My'NO ASA. P N1-6 t4P• J 1J, Sr R, 1! PI6LIt Poi. rt 4.0, !1 345.13 r 43,10 IP-P3 D /93 14. I PIi.l9 MB. 1/70 S.B. M.B. 9/2/ 58. M.B. 4✓96 M.8. 5452 M.B. 5/174 T. R. A. 945 STREET 5.37 230 2 4 fZ0. 50 TO TO �CTl7r'r'T n _ Riverside Land e lrrigailon Co. Casa Blanco Traci Surplus Addilion Viclaria Addillon El Grande Traci r72211r1 ainurrari mita IIENI® 111:111111111S1 ats,u; 1523115:3121 NEZEIZEDI DTZMEMEIN 111211112ZIENI 2II11® CatiMEM ammo rwarnizi CM Mill IESFiW/211 1222310/11 f4fAY=211 EramfA i{/!V® 1 /Lff! ithgPre/ *fag d•II7Ni Ad W W 1400AL OP=18 7.1 1.40, r1 • 1111111 s MOM MIN ::47-75=:° LZIA X Arlo &madras tiu ► aw sr Jm: Sitt . '4d-yp. �a i L',.L+y e.mi. -a ro. 4j 7-4 At s;.4 re u (,) , it ai('4:.isoYyq sue' r;p _P5-t4�i kwy Y„xN 6�n.ry Pe'y.;1;i w 7.M µ ft's¢ t..)4 `NtiStalyAr 1 -13fatxys. , [.1'4.0 x'Wf /YW.f FA �=.P.r.. -.74;4:4Rt! *al " AGENDA " " ITEM 7H RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Sheldon Peterson, Staff Analyst Stephanie Wiggins, Rail Department Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Division Head Programming and Administration , SUBJECT: Commuter Rail Program Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter. Rail Program Update as an information item. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Riverside Line 5,000 4,900 4,800 y 4,700 •c' 4,600 I— 4,500 0 4,400 u 4,300 4,200 4,100 4,000 Passenger Trips Riverside Line Off` Off` O� ,0 ,O� O� Off' O� O� ,O< O� ,O<0 PJ� 5e' 0 \-\°, oeP ��� FiP 4z . PQc �Sa\ Month Passenger trips on Metrolink's Riverside Line for the month of August averaged 4,317 which is down 56 (-1 %) from the month of July. The Line has averaged an overall decrease of (-8%) from a year ago August 2004. Agenda Item 7H 59 100 m 95 w 90 d 85 u d 80 a 75 70 On Time Performance (95% Goal) Riverside Line Off` Ob` . Ob` ,(4` p�` O4D O� O� O� ,O O� Off. Op PJ� 5°� ° \s" Off' lac Fe' ef" P��' ,VY �Jp �J\, O P Month August on -time performance averaged 98% inbound (+8% from July) and 99% outbound (+12% from July). There were 5 delays greater than 5 minutes during the month of August, a 23 point decrease from the month of July. Union Pacific Rail Road (UPRR) was able to run the trains on time, most likely due to the increasing pressure from Metrolink. The following were the primary causes: Dispatching Mechanical Other Riverside Line On -Time Performance Follow Up The Riverside Line has improved due toimproved dispatching from the UPRR. The Line On -Time Performance was 71% in April and improved to 99% in August, well above the target 95%. It appears that the recent performance meetings with UPRR have made ' a difference. It is important to wait and. see if the improved performance can be sustained. Agenda Item 7H 60 " " Inland Empir 4,000 3,900 3,800 y 3,700 " �' 3,600 1 3,500 6 3,400 It 3,300 3,200 3,100 3,000 P Passenger trion Metrolmk s Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC) Line for the month of August averaged 3,781 an increase of 227 riders or (+6%) change from the month of July. The line has increased 9% from a year ago August 2004. ps 100 95 a�� 90 85 a 75 70 d 80 PJ Agenda Item -Orange County Line Passenger Trips Inland Empire Orange County Line i I I I I O�� ok o�` co�Q 0 \-\ o�` o�� 0� Oh O�� lac (<0 '\-\\ M I Oh o`' o`3 o`' o`' oh PQi ��a�� ' ��Jc )J\ ,i- onth On Time Performance (95%Goal) - " - - - -- V - - - - - - - -...F ----- 1 I I I Off` o.` ot` OP` Off` off' CP ��Q��Q O6 ���J Oe�' ,fit` ����`O ,��at Month 7H 61 O4) Pr I 0<3 O�� off' CP 0 ��,z;\ ,JZ` ,J�� P��q August on -time performance averaged 95% southbound (-2% from July) and 95% northbound (+3% from July). There were 14 delays greater than five minutes during the month of August, an increase of, 3 from the previous month. The primary causes were: 91 Line 2,200 2,100 2,000 a 1,900 1,800 F— 1,700 5 1,600 4* 1,500 1,400 1,300 1,200 Passenger Trips 91 Line PJ�oS°�o�G�O�°� Quo�a�oF°�AtSa�AP<zv 4 °��J�A� �\o�15 Month Passenger trips on Metrolink's 91 Line for the month of .August averaged 1,953, a decrease of 18 riders or (-1 %) from the month of July. The line has averaged an increase of 8% from a year ago August 2004. Agenda Item 7H • 62 100 95 m R 90 .. aa) 85 d 80 a 75 70 On Time Performance (95% Goal) 91 Line' O� pt` Off` ,dx OR• O� O� O� 0 �o� Off' dap (<0 lac Month August on -time performance averaged 95% inbound (-1 % from July) and 97% outbound 10% from July). There were 8 delays greater than five minutes during the month of August, an increase of 2 from', July. The primary causes were: Signals/MOW/Track Dispatching Mechanical Other Metrolink Tickets for Displaced Hurricane Victims ROTC in coordination with Metrolink has provided 75 weekly passes and 60 round trip tickets for displaced hurricane victims who are now in Riverside. The tickets were delivered to the Riverside County Hurricane Victims Assistance Center on Box Springs Road in Riverside. The tickets will allow the users to travel anywhere in the Metrolink system. The tickets were especially appreciated by the workforce development staff who said that transportation will be one of the biggest obstacles for these new residents in finding employment. They were advised that Metrolink . would be able to provide additional tickets if needed. Agenda Item 7H 63 Station Activity Report The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) owns and maintains five Metrolink commuter rail stations in Riverside County. The stations range in size from Riverside -Downtown with 875 spaces, La Sierra with 1,067 spaces, Pedley with 283, West Corona with 545, and the North Main Corona station with 578. RCTC-owned stations are maintained at the highest quality possible to assure a well -kept, safe, and secure environment for Metrolink passengers. Shortly after the first two stations opened in June 1993, RCTC decided to extend guard service to 24-hours, 7 days a week due to thefts at the stations. Even with such coverage, crimes still occurred in the nature of vagrants/trespassing and vehicle break-ins, and the high cost of maintaining 24 hour guard service continued to grow. The following information will provide a synopsis of criminal incidents that have occurred since January 2000. The 2005 year data is for the period from January 1st, 2005 to June 30', 2005. Criminal Incidents -All Stations 139 109 21 45 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2A _, Burglary/Theft/Vandalism 2B- Vagrants/Trespassing 2C Suspicious Behavior 2D - Criminal Behavior 2E - Graffiti Total # of Incidents 19 75 22 3 20 139 21 63 11 4 10 109 13 22 4 3 3 45 8 5 1 6 1 21 8 8 2 1 20 6 3 3 13 75 173 41 20 38 347 Agenda Item 7H 64 Time of Day Incidents Occur Criminal Incidents - All Stations 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 26 10 16 7 8 13 13 7 14 8 1 0 6 3 5, 4i 7 1 3 2 6 2 0 0 91 87 4. 0 4 1 139 109 45 21 20 15 Total 80 43 26 13 187 349 The data depicts a continuous downward slope indicating the decline of criminal incidents reported at the stations. Between 2002 and 2003, criminal incidents decreased by 53%. In 2004, the number of incidents seemed to level out at 20 which is a significant improvement from the 139 incidents reported in 2000. The data for the first half of 2005 indicates that by the end of the year it will also be iri. the same range. Of the incidents when the time of day information was recorded, the majority of 76% occurred during Metro! nk operating hours 5 am to 8 pm. . Below are some examples of the recent incidents this year. 2A - Burglary / Theft / Vandalism Vehicle was broken into and speakers stolen. 3 Juveniles broke window of car, police took into custody. Car broken in by passenger window, unknown missing. 2005 2005 2005 2C - Suspicious Behavior A man searching through car that was not his. 2005 2D - Criminal Behavior Man smoking marijuana, RPD never showed up. 2005 RPD arrest man after domestic dispute. 2005 2E - Graffiti Graffiti noted on south tower by railroad tracks. 2005 Graffiti on south elevator, security cleaned it off. 2005 Agenda Item 7H 65 RCTC will continue to work with the security guards to improve conditions at the stations for our passengers. In addition, improvements are being made to the security camera system to make:it more useful for the security guards. Attachment: Metrolink Performance Summaries (August 2005) Agenda Item 7H • 66 METROLINK PERFORMANCE SUMMARIES August 2005 ILoltillIMETROLINK 42,000 METROLINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS 40,000 - 38,000 - "486 36,000 34,000 32,§0 30,000 28,000 26,000 24,000 22,000 20,000 Aug-04 37,982 Sep-04 38,636 oa-04 38,849 Nov-04 34,745 Dec-04 38,248 37,254 s Jarr05 Feb-05 l®Helidny Adj tUnadl Avp 39,196 Mar-06 39,654 Apr-05 39,437 May-05 39,004 Jun-05 38,380 Jul-05 39 Aug-05 Ava Weekday Riripra Rar_I Ina (:• aiwma ; %d10 Uleil© %d1O 1anassed ❑ 1 mimes puoiaaM sophoul olnpa40S 10 salnum-S uRSIM . SO OnV SO IM SO mt. SO hew SO AV SO RN SO God - SO uep roa0 "... 40 now. 1/0100 to des 90 onV ' %0 09 a .nc S `r'Lt.4`c y�y k d.SL b �i n i L >kfj�Y 4.y..•xF Ejhxa >4x;R ;k4o- _> hf?• ?bx.:L 'ti}k, .i> > x 'k . pS' ] ' � ^ } _ • �%LGh'`.r OT'j tL:.Lui }k., Kkxk Q L, �xOy LF j y �"^.L ry .k ..',] i;'. N o- ' z 1 _ . _ gip,' WTRF O' ��L `f S� .u�`�•'2'•o- 4' i`i. �d4 'C C ve;QL W W. L `FS`` v o-73� ,F}jY�.i� -sJ'�F� r Z F: C% 3n , � s <s, j 3».'Q Rne !SFL H ay�q ...'% +xF't+i yx �ft O' . %i3 q3% f °''. 'i.:�k {//'G . 4YLo-xv 'S t S L 3 £f x'SLF. r rF: ;rid h f f rLpD< Y'tiGL 'PA _ s£^'fL 3' S, hi# rY . Y'w. 5 `, , yy�L2. f9.`ra :� fi ix� Sk<>• £ y5 + h SrL�CALr7 •'u x<sL 4 p��k �. S ef'k •,r5{ L i L : o �,k�, e`3 c "idt5 �46 �: ,,t5S5 t�jk^'— r 4 �f; _ . n Y �.. �C�x ri +•'�' it k, <'f.�t b' : w L�Lf,' i 5 f Yf' jl <S: < �G A. _ 'x9`h2 b' � 'ri> % f,� Ci xd„t;' bs4' > 'x5:f 3e ' ' 9 G<SH,rt,4 s�kLFe Ox Y" L"L,y N' ` , �.E"A k% '�^SFf^ f{z } 'rvF+' iYjj 1 Yy j /�SEL .,,eX° #y"``.,'.Lr Si �` Y i x' zefNn 3;`�,'� �: ES N "Sk'xv"•'`ae'i.S fr jt, . _ . +� j'iLSKF P ��f�'$,�ru. .` 3` �. {i >? YHW Q y ,y,R .'g, .ML x.xrz}i( ' — 0'S9 96 _ " ' �`y. 5�iU2�t L ?.3iXFk �x L. $ '' e'a.2 S S : i� ' ` y ..w. r O k3}Yy t.�."yx.� ni_ yRj } �y 4�T2t %:.a ` >kk:j x f $ R Lph ti. LiilUt � J j ' Af �. i <RE < r s' ;i +. F A. : IZ:. 960'00 L * 3WIl-NO SNIVN1 SA 3WIl-NO SU3ON3SSVd 1.Na01:lad " " PERCENT PASSENGERS ON -TIME vs TRAINS ON -TIME * Aug 04 Sep 04 Oot 04 " Within 5-Minutes Of Schedule Includes Weekend Service Nov 04 Dec 04 Jan 05 Feb OS Mar OS Ap 06 May 06 Jun 05 , Jul 05 Aug 05 0 Passenger OTP% 13Train OTP% " 3 StislortITP s 66/ U 89/ F�1'`0120 ' 00 �azc) y3a cS CS c> einpeyog;o sa;num-6 Lwow . MOONIM H1NOW-E6 30NHW210�?!3d 3W11-NO 301A213S CIMVHS NVNENV ° WOG } `Yong - %0'0s - %Crg9 - %O.Ot - %0.08 - %O.gs - %0.06 %0'96 %0'001 UPRR 19% SDNR 0% SCRRA 11% OTHER 21% Indudea Weekend Service OTHER. 5% OPERATIONS' 34% Inductee Weekend Service SDNR 0% SCRRA 1% % of Train Delays By Responsibility August2005 AMTRAK-CONTRACTORS UPRR e 11% 0/'AMTRAK-INTERCITY 1 /o BNSF 23% ENGINEERING 17% BOMBARDIER 8% % of Train Delays By Responsibility 12 Month Period Ending August 2005 AMTRAK-CONTRACTORS 0% AMTRAK-INTER CITY 2% OPERATIONS:. 9% BNSF 17% BOMBARDIER 9% ENGINEERING 12% PERFORMANCE CHARTS - BACK-UP I( )11METROLINK METROLINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS THIRTEEN MONTH WINDOW • HOLIDAY ADJUSTED _. .,.k..:yY............::F.w .. .e,.:i.'.'Lt,.• n 1s;.:.;:.:o. �t�; a''���� i;K ...�.:'�.•. 3y "s.3y"trs �����h4 U .:.L^,q,.. : : d'r. . rF' ^,':• :.:SrS':., ;.rfY.. E..',•r. .;i. ,. 34 oa ':<x:'.�s»... • .?'.s„i..:,.: t•,.ya.s :�,3: x 9.��x >,aYv �„,N,M�}....;: iR�.a� 8 akif »3>i .,,, Aug 04 3,822 6,327 10,456 613 4,676 5,943 3,468 1,781 37,086 0% Sep 04 '3,954 6,370 10,913 632 4,829 5,755 3,555 1,974 37,982 2% Oct 04 4,143 6,540 11,221 644 4,575 5,973 3,647 1,893 38,636 2% Nov 04 4,099 6,769 10,902 671 4,896 6,001 3,649 1,862 38,849 1% Dec 04 3,465 6,187 -. 10,062 595 4,417 5,208 3,160 1,651 34,745 -11% Jan 05 3,378 5,953 ' 11,237 605 4,623 5,912 3,738 1,808 37,254 7% Feb 05 3,828 6,449 11,403 552 4,544 5,835 3,927 1,890 38,428 3% Mar 05 3,979 6,573 12,031 562 4,379 5,969 3,820 1,883 39,196 2% Apr 05 4,174 8,733 11,757 617 4,495 6,065 3,796 1,917 39,554 1% May 05 4,003 6,840 11,603 647 4,309 6,149 3,810 2,076 39,437 1% Jun 05 3,994 6,878 11,524 620 ' 4,445 5,967 3,605 1,971 39,004 -1% Jul 05 3,868 6,338 11,344 612 4,373 6,340 3,554 1,953 38,380 -3% Aug 05 3,835 6,854 11,384 655 4,317 6,325 3,781 1,906 39,057 2°% % Change Aug 05 vs Jul 05 -1% 8% 0% 7% -1 % 0%. 6% -2% 2%s % Change Aug 05 vs Aug 04 0% 8% 9% 7% -8% 6% 9% 7% 5% Aug Riders Table end ACJIl4Vr U4110 " AVERAGE DAILY METROLINK MONTHLY PASSHOLDERS ON AMTRAK THIRTEEN MONTH WINDOW ::is.:' ..... :;:1:.:.:...: :.I.L:.::r:.1.:...,isi::::::1:::,: ...;.:.:.:.��.,:.:.1.;::.:.:..:.:..���� :...:.::: '" ' " ; ... .:.:.:.:.:::.:" :" :" :iv1 .,::::::::::::5::i::: i:1::::::::::::::::::::::;::;:::::;:(:::p;" ; ��' E.1"COi��I ....;.....:...:...:.:.:...: ,��' 1 ......::..:N " ;::" :....:.;.:.::;.:.::;.:. t4 " .:::;::::::;:.:.:..:.:.:.:'::IN:.. ?1 F::::1!'1I- .1 :a:::.:::" Amish . , ��'��9��ssr,(<an��r}ran(��=::::�� :::./������,, .. : . 1, y��(��y. !q ��YfPM1:{!4!R4 I M?!rol pld.....r py ;,;; ...; .....:: ( :.:.!Slj:����'��; ; hifiiiii,)imikiti4 ��iirra[��ei: . 1- aS(. :.:.i" : " .�� Ni .����t..g4Y.:..:i8Gr1,d41?:;: ��:.:.:.: ��.:.:" :. ��.;.:.: .:1:. I.l.l" :::.:.:...:..... :1 :l:Waa?tge)YI'��artur#��aY::.:?����uitii��x:'::::��V,temkdaY.:;��:::::SaEapdaF::;::i:;��l&1#Ii1aYr,? .. ...��-N) :.:::.I::::I: . ..1 I...t: ....t....... .)..:::11:::::::::::::::::il:;::::: '. ..I.....:.1.1.. 11 .. :iL.veekd4f��:;��:Beturge��:::::��gr)H��x::s::arY;M�SI'cllilk; .. �� .:.1...:.:.:..:.:.... ..,1: :.::4 Aug 04 1,110 244 275 128 86 34 1,238 330 309 0% 16% 21% 99 Sep-04 (e) 1,106 210 199 135 21 25 1_,241 231 224 0% -30% -28% 93 Oot-04 (to) 1,222 255 237 137 43 19 1,359 298 256 10% 29% 14% 85 . Nov-04 (4) 1,246 296 270 152 27 26 1,398 323 296 3% 8% 16% 83 48 Deo-04 (5) 1,123 251 197 212 13 24 1,335 264 221 -5% -18% -25% 85. 49 Jan-05 (6) 1,115 190 ' 199 268 22 20 1,383 212 219 4% -20% -156 103 48 Feb-05(11) 1;192 236 236 179 12 51 1,371 248 287 -1% 17% 31% 68 30 Mar-05 1,235 483 319 216 40 37 1,451 523 356 6% 111% 24% 89 50 Apr-05 1,293 347 253 221 56 23 1,514 402 276 " 4% -23% -23% 148 48 J May-05(12) 1,297 380 256 223 94 62 1,519 475 318. 0% . 18% 15% 153 68 A.. Jun-05_ --1.,250 .----379- - -333----- -244 - 89 --- -44--- .-1,494* 468 - - ---2Mo------1�l0-- -19%--- -125- 377 56 Jul-05(a) 1,203 305 267 269 35 26 1,472 340 292 -1% -27% -235'0 216 57 Aug-05 1,331 365 285 253 - 79 27 1,584 444 312 8% 31% 7% 231 57 vie mange. Aug 05 vs Jul 05 11% 20% 7% -6% 128% 6%. 8�/a 31% 7% Ye Change' Aug 05 vs Aug 04 20% 50% 4% 98% -8% -21% 28% 35% (1) Prior to Rail 2 R60, Amtrak Step-Up/No Step -Up program was only good on Amtrak weekday trains. (2) Rafi 2 Rail proprarostarted September 1, 2002. (3) Mlsaing data hes been adjusted by using the lowest ndersMp count for the respective train, day of week and month. (4) Average of first 3 weeks of month only as blecluout in place for the Thanksgiving week, NOTE: Started Code Share trains north of LA 11/17/04, monthly passholdars Included In Rail 2 Rail counts (5) Average excluding Christmas and New year's Day holidays. NOTE In 2004 -Coaster Os higher due to derailment on 12/17 - (6) Average excluding January 1 and MLK holiday. In 2005 no Amtrak service north of LA after 1/9N5 end south of LA 1 /12-14. Average refleete days of service (7) Average excluding May 31 (9) Average excluding July 4 holiday _ (9) Average excluding Labor Day (10) Average excluding Columbus Day - (11) In January end February 2005, service Inlenupted north of LA due to storms. Average reflects only days with service. (12) May 311ncluded In Sunday counts - - - - 7% 0% 133% 9 Parf summ-Rail 2 Ra1129R/200S 42,000 METROLINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS -HOLIDAY ADJUSTED INCEPTION TO DATE 40,000 - FY 05/06 o e t' 34,000 3 32,000 30,000 28,000 26,000 24,000 M 22,000 20,000 18,000 16,000 X, 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 Jul X Aug FY 04/05 r''FY 03/04 FY 02/03 ,.., F1 01 /02 . FY 00/01 .„....-,i t----" .'"',.,..,••-*--------+*Y 99/00 . ._�._ 98/99 N. 97/98 XFY 96/97 X X Sep Oct Nov X Dec Jan Feb X Mar Apr May FY 95/96 Y 94/95 FY 93/94 Jun AYn RitiAM TANA AM Mu111-Yr 1 Ins• 1.4NVutOtMUUeO lL SO•Bny Inf unp Fen /dy IBA clod uep s9a AoN sdul Je6uessed Apci a6eJany awns AapunS-aun ouipaeuaas_ ues OD/SZ/90 ueCeg. eouueS kinunS Mon deg 40-6ny 0 009 0001 0091 000Z 009Z 000£ 009£ slapia AIPO 6AV Inf unr deW idy /ew clod uer sea ADN sdpi ae6uassed Apea e6eaeny aop gag-iepanies-aun-ouipaewas ues PO ueniu ABA Allmon yl sepnluUl 7deS :e70N deg g0-6ny 0 009 0001. 0091 0 000Z 7u a co 009Z y 000£ 009E s043nv mr unr Aew ,dy and Uer 09Q sdpi Ja6uassed APO 86816AV eovueg Aup.un}eg eun Aeilen edomud noN p0 des go-6ny " METROLINK SCHEDULE ADHERENCE SUMMARY - WEEKDAY SERVICE Percentage of Trains Arriving Within 5 Minutes of Scheduled Time LATEST 13 MONTHS , Rryry .O. Q,.ft.. dam cs �� 'l yy, :. �� p L."ter';. ..? 1: ? .1n#eli pe" oft '�� L o r- kw - re'i. ��:... t{W Say ��>*I��x > i{ i � Ih .'' .t.����lt 91% 90% < ��ur������Tu��ns tiF'>. 4 CSS :<i "t; ti'42: 97% 99% ��itot: 4 i:',: n .s��f 93% .:,H<; < s .. 92% ����n���� .a to e ..�� .. OVS 91% 91% 9:�0.0 iwalpI: t -> > .:., itii! 4 < L Q', 95% 89% "21-f��> < r ,.�� , ?<. t.��., f 92% 94% ":, 01. ��ate#< < ;v��i��t. ; r Lit, 94% 93% a .j0 .��. 94% Aug04 99%s 99% .`.'. 98% 93% Sep 04, 99% 98% '98% 95% 94% . 91% 98% 100% 86% 89% 89% 91% 91% 87-% 93% 89% 94% 93% 93% Oct04 99% 98% 95% 93% 94% 89% 98% 98% 85% 82% 91% 94% 90% 93% 90% 94% 93% 92% 93% NOv04 96% 97% 94% 96% 96% 95% 98% 98% 89% 83% 90% 91% 92% 91% . 94% 92% 94% 94% 94% Dec 04 99% 96.% 94% 93% 95% 97%u 99% 99% 87% 87% 92% 96% 93% 94% 95% 97% 94% 95% 95% Jan 05 88% 81% 87% 77% _ 98% 94% 97% 98% 82% 70% 65% 87% 91% 88% 87% 94% 90% 87% 89% Feb 05 90% 89% 90% 87% 95% 92% 96% 97% 87% 88% 89% 87% 89% 86% 96% 95% 92% 90% 919'0 ti air - -- 05 98% 93% 98% 95% 99% 99% 99% 99% 89% _ 71% 95% 93% 91% 79% .. 92% 97% -96% 93% 94% Apr 05 95% 96% 98% 96% 97% 95% 99% " 1009'0 759'0 67% 95% 94% 96% 90% 92% 90% 94% 93% 94% May 05 97% 94% 91% 86% 97% 96% 98% 99% 85% 75% 91% 95% 94% 95% 92% 96% 94% 92% 93% Jun 05 97% 94% 91% 86% 97% 96% 98% 99% 85% 75% 91% 95% 94% 95% 92% 96% 94% 92% 93% Jul 05 98% 93% 91% 87% 97% 93% 100% 99% 92% 82% 95% 96% 98%s 94% . 94% 98% 96% 92% 94% Aug 05 . 95% 95% 95% 89% 96% 98% 100% 98% 98% 99% 95% 98% 95%, 95% 95% 97% 98% 96% 96% Peak Period Trains Arriving Within 6 Minutes of Scheduled TI AugPeriod EN Ri'111L ; ��:._ tr G .;..R1df:.da��Dtlfe' ., <:.;...:uNB: elite f 0.... <::,:>::SUFkr'[1tr11$ >..;r ,...'1Y>h2A1If&s, H ,,-,r n :,":��7X;'j pots ".=; 3#TE F.1:1fp1.QL' 0iQf1t9 `. r' .; :k9+l Y t Lew ��" ::: # 'slt3t3H ,.3.'ClL��tl3tYtl Tg1:53/s'E >:: Peak Period .. - - ,' Trams 92% " 92% " 97% 86% " 94%. 97% " 100% 97% - 98% 98% ' .97% " 98% 92% ' 96% ' 96% 98% 96%' 95%s . �95% No adjustments have been made for relievable delays. Terminated trains are considered OT if they were on -time at point,of termination. Annulled trains are not included in the on -time calculation. 13 CAUSES OF METROLINK DELAYS August2005 PRIMARY CAUSE OF TRAIN DELAYS GREATER THAN 5!MINUTES CAUSE: VEN .: AVL . SNB BUR . .'RIV. OC .. INL/OC . 91-LA TOTAL % of TOT ENGR-IMPROVEMENT/CONST" 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1% ENGR-OTHER 0; "`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% ENGR-S&C 5 4 7 2 1 1 5: 0 25 19% ENGR-TRACK 1 4 0 0 1 1 0. 0 7 5% MECH 1 4 3 0 0 0 3 0 11 8% OPS-DISPATCH 7 3 0 0 3 9 3 6 31 23% OPS-OTHER 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 2 7 5% Ca3S-PASSENGER . o: 1 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 11 8% OPS-SCRRA 4 22 6 1 0 2 2 0 37 28% OPS-T AND E 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2% TOTAL : 21 44 22 3 5 15 14 8 132 100% 14 • Saturday SNB • 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 8 Saturday AVL. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 1 0 0 1 Sunday SNB 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 4 0905CAUS " FREQUENCY OF TRAIN DELAYS BY DURATION August 2005 MINUTES LATE: VEN AVL SNB BUR RIV OC IE/OC RIV/FUL TOTAL % of TOT NO DELAY 359 370 654 257 255 371 222 190 2,678 83.4% 1 MIN - 5 MIN 34 138 105 16 15 51 33 8 400 12.5% 6 MIN - 10 MIN 14 25 18 2 3 10 7 3 82 2.6% 11 MIN - 20 MIN 6 13 3 1 2 5 2 3 35 1.1 % 21 MIN - 30 MIN 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 5 0.2% 0 iiRE-ATER-THAN 30 MIN 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 2 10 0.3% ANNULLED 0 0 1 0 1 1 6 2 11 0.3% TOTAL TRAINS OPTD 414 552 781 276 275. 437 269 206 3,210 100% TRAINS DELAYED >0 min 55 182 127 19 20 66 47 16 532 16.6% TRAINS DELAYED > 5 min 21 44 22 3 5 15 14 8 132 4.1% 15 0805FREQ AGENDA ITEM 8 " RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County. Transportation Commission FROM: Anne Mayer, Division Head Programming and Administration THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Report on Planning and Programming Issues STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the report on planning and programming issues. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Presentations and discussions at the June workshop summarized not only accomplishments but also established the groundwork for 2009 Measure implementation. The workshop discussion considered an Economic Development Incentives Program, Private Sector Financing Program, current limitations and strengthening partnerships. These components are significant but represent just a few of the strategic actions we must undertake in the next few years. ' Our intent is to bring the individual strategic actions together to form a 10-year project delivery plan. Although new revenue is more than three years away, it is essential that development of a project delivery plan begin as soon as possible. The project delivery plan objectives will be to establish priorities and realistic schedules based on financial constraints. As simplistic as the objectives sound, the factors influencing plan development are numerous and complex. The following is a look ahead at key decisions to be made over the next six to nine months, which demonstrates the complexity of the factors " The 2006 STIP will be adopted next spring by the California Transportation Commission (CTC). With revenue stream uncertainty, the Commission could be faced with no new programming available. There are funds in an unprogrammed reserve targeted for the 91 HOV project from Adams Street to the 60/91 /215 interchange. The original intent was to fully program the project for construction in this cycle If no new funding is available, a huge gap will need to be filled in order to keep that priority project on schedule. Lack of STIP funds for this project will significantly impact available funding for other projects. Agenda Item S. 82 " The State Route 91 Major Investment Study is scheduled for completion and selection of a preferred alternative by December. Again, a key decision point that could influence project and funding priorities. " Progress continues on the Mid County Parkway and as those alternatives are refined the project scope, cost and schedule will be determined. The scope of this project will also impact adjacent facilities such as 1-15 and 1-215. " The Private Financing and Economic Development Programs goals and -- guidelines will be established. " Project Study Reports (PSR's) for priority projects are scheduled for completion by June 2006. " Staff is recommending an update of Measure "A revenue forecast for use in budgeting and strategic planning, of which approval for a RFP is requested under another agenda item before the Commission. If approved, the update will be available by March 2006. " Design/Build legislation and its use as a tool for accelerated project delivery was discussed at the June workshop. Unfortunately, no action was taken on the legislation so that delivery tool will not be available in the near future. Staff will continue to work with our colleagues and state elected officials to outline the benefits of the legislation in anticipation of the new legislative sessions in early 2006. Development of a delivery plan will be an iterative process dependent on many issues. The simplest approach to take is to wait until key issues are resolved before moving forward. However, as the issues above are resolved. new ones will take their place therefore the recommended approach is to begin now. In the coming months, staff will be recommending actions for approval to begin the development of a 10-year delivery plan as well as providing. updates on the critical issues highlighted above. Agenda Item 8 83 AGENDi ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement No. Agreement No. 03-31-014, Prepare Construction Plans Corona Metrolink Station 06-33-548, Amendment No. 2 to with Chong Partners Architecture to for a Parking Structure for the North Main STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-33-548, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 03-31-014 to prepare the plans, specifications and cost estimate (PS&E) for the amount of $900,665 and a total not to exceed amount of $1,294,853; 2) Approve the total design and construction project budget of $26,294,853; and, 3) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its September 11, 2002 meeting, the Commission approved an agreement with Gordon H. Chong &Partners (now Chong Partners Architecture) to prepare preliminary plans for a 1,000'stall parking structure at the North Main Corona Metrolink Station for an amount of $316,798. The need for the parking structure in the near future was apparent from the fact that the current station parking, consisting of roughly 580 spaces, was nearly full at the time the station was opened and is now completely full. In addition, station, patrons are spilling out onto the street and using an additional 110 unmarked street parking spaces. This brings the total current parking demand to roughly 690 spaces. Demand for parking at this station will continue to be driven upward by the nature of the unique location of the station adjacent to both the 1-15 and SR 91 freeways, and the continued worsening of the congestion on these freeways. Current SCRRA projections for the station indicate that p anning is needed for an additional 900 Metrolink related spaces by the year 201(b and 1,300 additional Metrolink related Agenda Item 9 spaces by the year 2020. Comparing the future demand to our current capacity shows that there will be a shortage of 210 Metrolink spaces in '2010 and . 610 Metrolink spaces short in 2020. Note that the above numbers do not include park and ride. Currently, there is no accommodation for park and ride at the station because of the lack of capacity. Staff had previously submitted an application for $1 1 million, in the 2002 Interregional, Transportation Improvement Program °TIP), to construct a 1,000 space parking structure at the proposed North Main Corona Metrolink station. The application was forwarded to Ca!trans and was included in the California Transportation Commissions. (CTC's) adopted 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The first. $500,000 of the $11 million funding for the project was obligated to complete the conceptual design and environmental clearance for the project. After initial consultation with the City of Corona and consultants representing Chong Partners, it became obvious that the initial planning effort needed to encompass a larger initial planning activity after which the plan to construct the proposed parking structure could continue as soon as the state funding could be made available. The additional planning suggested by the City of Corona, and concurred with by staff, was to plan for the eventual maximization of the parking at the station using the entirety of the existing surface parking area. Amendment 1 to the subject contract was approved by the Commission on September 3, 2003 to perform this additional service for an amount of $77,390. This task has been completed and the CEQA environmental document has been approved by the City. The currently approved conceptual plan will allow for three different parking structure configurations that can be selected to best meet future parking demand. Parking Structure A on the east lot will net 809 new spaces after subtracting the lost surface parking. Parking Structure B will net 671 spaces but must be built after orin conjunction with Parking Structure A because it will use the ramps constructed by Parking Structure A. Parking Structure C on the west lot will net'859 additional spaces. If all three parking structures are built they will result in a total of, 2,734 spaces that could be made available for Metrolink and rideshare parking at this station. Staff is, recommending that the Parking Structure C (west lot) be constructed first. This will net 859 new spaces and bring the total number of parking spaces to 1,443 spaces (1,098 structure + 345 east lot). This will allow the Commission to provide as many as 543 (1443-900) park and ride spaces based on 2010 demand which will reduce to .143 (1443-1300),based on 2020 demand without the construction of additional parking structure capacity. Agenda Item 9 85 " " The existing park and ride lot near the, intersection of Main Street and Grand Boulevard will hold 272 vehicles and is currently full with an estimated additional 100 park and ride vehicles parked in the street. Based on the source of funding, the Commission will have to allow/park and ride vehicles access to the parking structure when it is opened so it is important to have additional capacity to fully meet the demand that will occur from both Metrolink and park and ride at this station. Based on the above numbers, it will likely not have sufficient capacity by 2020 to accommodate both _ Metrolink demand and park and ride demand. As a result, the next phase of parking structure expansion should be under consideration no later than 2015 so that it will be online before 2020. Assuming that the consultant receives a notice to proceed by January 1, 2006, we anticipate having the plans ready to bid by Fall 2006. The actual construction will take approximately 16 months. The estimated cost to construct the proposed facility is roughly $15,000 /stall plus escalation which results in an early estimate of $20 million dollars for the construction contract. Assuming staff would need 15% for contingencies and 10% for the construction management team, this indicates that an additional $5 million would be needed to deliver the project. This would bring the estimate for construction to $25 million dollars. In addition, since the construction of the parking structure will displace 239 spaces, staff will be looking at locations for temporary parking and shuttle service during construction to mitigate the impacts to the existing patrons using the station. Staff (will also look for ways to better utilize the West Corona Station that currently has excess capacity (currently only at 50% of 540 spaces) and may still have sufficient capacity at the time of construction to address some of the displaced parking of the west lot of North Main Corona. The current contract status is that the previous work was completed for an amount of $379,038 out of a total authorized amount of $394,188 leaving $15,150 remaining. At this time, staff is recommending that the Commission approve Agreement No. 06-33-548, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement 03-31-014, for abase amount of $900,665 ($915,815 - $15,150) for a new total not to exceed amount of $1,294,853 (excludes fees for City of Corona plan check and building permits). Agenda Item 9_ 8 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2005-06 Amount: $900,665 Federal Transit Administration: Source of Funds: $130,000 State Transportation Improvement Budget Adjustment: N Program: $770,665 221-33-81102 Final Design = $800,665 P3808 GLA No.: 221-33-81120 Material Testing = $50,000 P3808 221-33-81105 Surveying = $50,000 P3808 Fiscal Procedures Approved:\Aittect64,11thz, Date: 10/04/05 Attachments 1) A1.0 Existing Site Plan 2) A1.1 Garage Plans 3) Chong Partners Architecture Proposal dated September 30, 2005 Agenda Item 9 87 Icoop • EAISiWO PLAN CA I 1.1 RIM -....1 L__ took.....c......-2 -1 - . . _-',-,,L1.--- -` 0 if 10V.TNINNI , . . . .....:.% . • - nANnI4ON STREET I III 11..1 III. 11111 e ;.—. _ -a- I North Main Corona Metrolink Station Parking Structure f ticaltuippERWARptilTEMMMIL :*4100 LK. C4) Vro�uEICINITY MAP 8 �+ d Its li / I.1;.1 i,4\ � < a,f l �T� PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS Al,.. North Main Corona Metrolink Station Parking Structure BLAINE IAMB ., M1 ., .�Ye1 • STREE ARAGE A ,.w Pu.161...4ro1.. euuro ,v,,•...a. C2D FULL BUILDOUT PLAN GARAGE S op' e, PH II - PS&E and Construction Proposal ROTC Corona Main Station Parking Structure • Preliminary Design (35% PS&E) a Chong Partners will meet with RCTC to review and confirm the objectives, schedule and budget for the project. Final, detailed design parameters for the project will be documented including circulation (vehicular, pedestrian and transit), safety and security, access control, durability and maintenance. The Site Survey (boundary, topography and utility) and Geotechnical Report will be prepared for the Preliminary phase Based upon the final criteria and the approved concept, Chong Partners will prepare Preliminary Design drawings, Outline Specifications and Cost Estimate. d. The Preliminary, 35% Design phase will define the project in greater detail and will provide a vehicle for communication with RCTC and specific decision -making as to building systems, components, materials, colors, finishes, typical details, etc. c. e. Deliverables shall include preliminary: • Architectural Site Plan • Civil Grading, Drainage and Utility Plans • Landscape Plan • Pedestrian Bridge Plan/Elevation' • Floor Plans • Equipment Plans • Building Elevations • Building Sections • Wall Sections • Foundation and Framing Plans !, • Mechanical and Electrical Plans 1 • Typical Construction Details • Draft Specifications • Site Survey • Geotechnical Report • Cost Estimate f. Preliminary Design services shall include monthly project reviews with RCTC as well as coordination meetings with the Corona's Planning, Building and Fire Departments. Six meetings are included in this phase. September 30, 2005 90 PH II - PS&E and Construction RCTC Corona Main Station Proposal Parking Structure Final Design (65-100% PS&E) a. Pre -final Tasks • Incorporate comments from the PreliminaryDesign review. • Coordinate architect/engineer team activities. •_ Review revised construction cost estimates. • Prepare 65% complete documents for RCTC review and: preparation of " bid documents (Construction Contract, General Conditions and Invitation for Bid) • Prepare 95% complete drawings and specifications for City of Corona Building and Plan Check. • Submit 95% drawings and specifications to RCTC for constructability review and for bid document preparation ,(Construction Contract, General Conditions and Invitation for Bid):. • Incorporate RCTC's and City's review comments and prepare final construction documents. • Prepare construction cost estimate b. Pre -final Deliverables • 65 and 95% Complete Construction Drawings • 65 and 95% Complete Specifications • Final cost estimate a Final Deliverables • Final construction documents (100%) with RCTC and City approval suitable for bidding and construction d. Eight meetings are included in this phase; monthly project reviews with RCTC plus two meetings with Corona Building, Plan Check' and Fire Departments September 30, 2005 91 " " " PH II - PS&E and Construction Proposal Preliminary Schedule RCTC Corona Main Station Parking Structure Based upon previous experience with parking structures of similar scope and scale, an estimated project delivery schedule is as follows: Preliminary Design (35%) 65% PS&E 95% PS&E Plan Check and Permit : COMPENSATION November 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006 (12 weeks) February 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006 (8 weeks) April 1, 2006 to May 31, 2006 (8 weeks) June 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006 (8 weeks) For the services described above, we propos a total fee of $915,815.00. The . following is a breakdown of fees by phase wth the allowance for additional service allocated by phase. Basic Services: Preliminary Design (35%) Final Design (65-100%) Subtotal Fees Site Investigations: Site Survey Geotechnical Study Geotechnical Review Subtotal Site Fees Reimbursable Expenses': Travel Printing, Postage and Delivery Subtotal Expenses TOTAL FEES $_ 294,915.00 $ 528,840.00 $ 823,755.00 $ 8,560.00 $ 52,300.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 63,560.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 28,500.00 $915,815.00 September 30, 2005 92 PH I1 - PS&E and Construction Proposal *Reimbursable Expenses RCTC Corona Main Station Parking Structure Reimbursable expenses are in addition to Basic and Additional Services and include out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Chong Partners and its employees and subconsultants in the interest of the project including expenses of all travel, reproductions; plotting and printing; postage, delivery and handlings of drawings, reports and specifications. Fees for City of Corona Plan Check and Building Permit are not included. Invoicing Monthly, percent complete invoices will be submitted based on an agreed to payment schedule for the duration of the project, which will allocate appropriate fees per month for each phase of the project. This payment schedule will be. developed in consultation with the City. PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS 1. Base scope of work includes parking facility only without commercial or retail uses. Other mixed use spaces, office space, tenant improvements, etc. are excluded. 2. Basic services include: architecture; parking planning; civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical (power, lighting and fire alarm) engineering; and landscape security system design and cost estimating. 3. All project approvals will be obtained from the RCTC and City of Corona. The project will be reviewed by the State and Federal Government for funding purposes only. , 4. RCTC will prepare the Construction Contract General Conditions of the Specifications and will provide these at the earliest opportunity. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following services, when approved in writing by RCTC, shall be considered work beyond the scope of services outlined above and will be billed on an .hourly basis as an additional service: • Work resulting from changes in scope or magnitude of the project. • Additional work and/or revisions resulting from changes .requested and/or authorized by RCTC after the Architects' work has been previously approved by RCTC. • Additional services caused by schedule delays or interruptions. • Meetings in addition to those outlined in the Scope of Services described above. September 30, 2005 93 PH II - PS&E and Construction Proposal RCTC Corona Main Station Parking Structure • Special hearings, presentations, community workshops, or other meetings, in addition to those outlined in the Scope of Services, required to secure Project approvals. • More extensive site representation during construction • Changes required by the enactment or revision of codes, laws or regulations subsequent to the preparation of such documents; provided, that Architect should not have known of such forthcoming revisions to such codes, laws or regulations as a result of generally available notices or publicity. • Off- site improvements, street realignment, upgrading or extending off -site utilities, etc. September 30, 2005 94 " GORDON H CHONG & PARTNERS Riverside County Transportation Commission New Parking Structure Corolla Main Metrolink Commuter Rail Station Phase II- Final Design and PS&E Fee Summary Current AS of: 09/30/2005 " " Arch4eittil* l'Orolict" Mgml .............  .... Elecrrical sae Preliminary PS&E (35%) 65%, 95% and Final PS&E 158,400 83,000 7,400 12,000 11,200 7,915 15,000 294,915 264,000 156,000 , 38 700 24 160 , 14,100 10,480 21,400 528,840 Subtotal Basic Services $422,400 .$239,000 $46,1001 $36,1601 $25,300 518,395 " $36,400 $823,755 " G64iFFhrtical" : SuktotaL ;Sits Preliminary PS&E (35�/0) 8,560 i 52,300 60,860 65%T95%-and Final-PS&E 2,700 2,700 Subtotal Basic Services $8,560 $55,000 $63,560 Travel Printing, Postage and Delivery 7,500 21,000 Subtotal Expenses $28,500 95 823,755 63,560 28,500 $915,815 CHONG PARTNERS Architecture Riverside County Transportation Commission New Parking Structure Corona Main Metrolink Commuter Rail Station Phase II- Final Design and PS&E Fee Summary Current As of: 09/30/2005 Pte11»it�ary P Arcl Adin In Tokats ;::: A. Develop Workplan and Schedule B. Consultant Coordination . C. Monthly Project Review Meetings D. Prepare Code Analysis' E. Meet with City Bldg. and Fire F. Site Plan G. Floor Plans H. Exterior Elevations I. Building Sections J. Core/Stair and Elevator Plans K. Exterior Wail Sections L. Typical Details. M. Material Color Selections N. Update Code Analysis O. Outline Specifications P. Statement of Probable Construction Cost 16 20 8 44 24 40 16 80 32 32 16 8 24 32 16 16 12 24 40 32 96 24 80 40 144 24 40 60 124 24 80 80 184 24 40 24 88 - 40 80 24 144 40 80 24 144 16 40 20. 76 8 16 24 8 40 24 72 8 16 24 Subtotal Hours 120. 420 480 304 0 0 0 0 76 1,276. Hourly Salaries , Total This Phase 190 $22,800 135 $56,700 100 548,000 85 $25,840 65 $0 55 $0 $0 $0 66 $5,016 $124.10 $158,356 96 • " CHONG PARTNERS Architecture Riverside County Transportation Commission New Parking Structure Corona Main Metrolink Commuter Rail. Station Phase II- Final Design and PS&E Fee Summary Current As of: 09/30/2005 F3 id1 Pg% loofa lrit01. Cfedoal i; Tcrtats A. Update Work Plan and Schedule B. Consultant Coordination C. Monthly Project Review Meetings E. Meet with City Bldg. and Fire B. Quality Assurance C. Incorporate 35% Comments D. Title Sheet/Notes/Abbrevs, E, Code Sheet F. Site Plan G. Floor Plans (4) H. Exterior Elevations I. Building Sections J. Enlarged Elevations (4) K. Wall Sections (4) L. Ceiling/Lighting. Plans (5) M. Enlarged Stair/Elevator Plans N. Elevator Details O. Exterior Details (4) P. Roof Details Q. Interior Details (20 R. Graphics Signage and Striping (4) S. Specifications Subtotal Hours Hourly Salaries 16 16 16 48 16 40 16 72 48 48 16 24 24 12 8 82 24 114 8 80 80 168 24 40 64 40 80 120 40 80 120 40 80 120 40 80 120i 40 80 120 24 80 104 24 80 104 24 80 104 24 80 104 24 80 104 24 80 104 24 80 104 . 32 80 112 40 80 120 120 120 874 640 600 0 0 0 0 40 124 160 2,186 190 135 100 85 65 55 66 $120.76 Total This Phase $22,800 $117,990 $64,000 S51,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,184 $263,974 TOTAL Basic Service Hours Hourly Salaries 240 1,294 1,120 904 0 0 0 0 200 3,462 190 121 100 80 65 55 65 $121.99 GRAND TOTAL $45,600 $174,690 $112,000 $76,840 $0 SO $0 $0 $13,200 $422,330 " Riverside County Transportation Commission New Parking Structure Chong Partners Architecture HOURLY BILLING RATES SCHEDULE September 30, 2005 STAFF TYPE Partner Associate Partner/Project Director Project Architect Senior Architect Project Designer Project Coordinator Architect Intermediate Designer Junior Designer Project Administrator RATE CALCULATION FOR THE YEAR 2005/06 HOURLY RATE $ 230.00 $ 195.00 $ 125.00 $120.00 - $ 145.00 $ 95.00 - $ 125.00 $ 85.00 - $ 115.00 $ 80.00 - $ 120.00 $ 70.00 - $ 95.00 $ 60.00 - $ 80.00 $ 60.00 - $ 80.00 The above audited, hourly billing rates include direct labor plus a multiplier of for statutory, employee benefits, overhead and profit. 98 REVISION TO AGENDA ITEM 9 Additions noted by Bold Italics Deletions noted by Strikcthrough RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transpor ation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement Agreement No. 03-31-014, Prepare Construction Plans Corona Metrolink Station No. 06-33-548, Amendment No. 2 to with Chong Partners Architecture to for a Parking Structure for the North Main STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-33-548, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 03-31-014 to prepare the plans, specifications and cost estimate (PS&E) for the amount of $900,665 and a total not to exceed amount of $1,294,853; and, 3) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its September 11, 2002 meeting, the Commission approved an agreement with Gordon H. Chong & Partners (now Chong Partners Architecture) to prepare preliminary plans for a 1,000 stall parking structure at the North Main Corona Metrolink Station for an amount of $316,798. The need for the parking structure in the near future was apparent from the fact that the current station parking, consisting of roughly 580 spaces, was nearly full at the time the station was opened and is now completely full. In addition, station patrons are spilling out onto the street and using an additional 110 unmarked street parking spaces. This brings the total current parking demand to roughly 690 spaces. Agenda Item 9 , Demand for parking at this station will cont nue to be driven upward by the nature of the unique location of the station adjacent to both the 1-15 and SR 91 freeways, and the continued worsening of the congestion on these freeways. Current SCRRA projections for the station indicate that p anning is needed for an additional 900 Metrolink related spaces by the year 2010 and 1,300 additional Metrolink related spaces by the year 2020. Comparing the future demand to our current capacity shows that there will be a shortage of 210 Metrolink spaces in 2010 and 610 Metrolink spaces short in 2020. Note that the above numbers do not include park and ride. Currently, there is no accommodation for park and ride at the station because of the lack of capacity. Staff had previously submitted an application for $1 1 million, in the 2002 Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP), to construct a 1,000 space parking structure at the proposed North Main Corona Metrolink station. The application was forwarded to Ca!trans and was included in the California Transportation Commission's (CTC's) adopted 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The first $500,000 of the $11 million funding for the project was obligated to complete the conceptual design and environmental clearance for the project. After initial consultation with the City of Corona and consultants representing Chong Partners, it became obvious that the initia planning effort needed to encompass a larger initial planning activity after which the plan to construct the proposed parking structure could continue as soon as the state funding could be made available. The additional planning suggested by the City of Corona, and concurred with by staff, was to plan for the eventual maximization of the parking at the station using the entirety of the existing surface parking area. Amendment 1 to the subject contract was approved by the Commission on September 3, 2003 to perform this additional service for an amount of $77,390. This task has been completed and the CEQA environmental document has been approved by the City. The currently approved conceptual plan will allow for three different parking structure configurations that can be selected to best meet future parking demand. Parking Structure A on the east lot will net 809 new spaces after subtracting the lost surface parking. Parking Structure B will net 671 spaces but must be built after or in conjunction with Parking Structure A because it will use the ramps constructed by Parking Structure A. Parking Structure C spaces. If all three parking structures are on the west lot will net 859 additional built they will result in a total of 2,734 spaces that could be made available for Metrolink and rideshare parking at this station. Staff is recommending that the Parking Structure C (west lot) be constructed first. This will net 859 new spaces and bring the total number of parking spaces to 1,443 spaces (1,098 structure + 345 east lot). This will allow the Commission to provide as Agenda Item 9 many as 543 (1443-900) park and ride spaces based on 2010 demand which will reduce to 143 (1443-1300) based on 2020 demand without the construction of additional parking structure capacity. The existing park and ride lot near the intersection of Main Street and Grand Boulevard will hold 272 vehicles and is currently full with an estimated additional 100 park and ride vehicles parked in the street. Based on the source of funding, the Commission will have to allow park and ride vehicles access to the parking structure when it is opened so it is important to have additional capacity to fully meet the demand that will occur from both Metrolink and park and ride at this station. Based on the above numbers, it will likely not have sufficient capacity by 2020 to accommodate both Metrolink demand and park and ride demand. As a result, the next phase of parking structure expansion should be under consideration no later than 2015 so that it will be online before 2020.. Assuming that the consultant receives a notice to proceed by January 1, 2006, we anticipate having the plans ready to bid by Fall 2006. The actual construction will take approximately 16 months. The estimated cost to construct the proposed facility is roughly $15,000 /stall plus escalation which results in an early estimate of $20 million dollars for the construction contract. Assuming staff would need 1 5 % for contingencies and 10% for the construction management team, this indicates that an additional $5 million would be needed to deliver the project. This would bring the estimate for construction to $25 million dol ars. In addition, since the construction of the parking structure will displace 239 spaces, staff will be looking at locations for temporary parking and shuttle service during construction to mitigate the impacts to the existing patrons using the station. Staff will also look for ways to better utilize the West Corona Station that currently has excess capacity (currently only at 50% of 540 spaces) and may still have sufficient capacity at the time of construction to address some of the displaced parking of the west lot of North Main Corona. The current contract status is that the previous work was completed for an amount of $379,038 out of a total authorized amount of $394,188 leaving $15,150 remaining. At this time, staff is recommending that the Commission approve Agreement No. 06-33-548, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement 03-31-014, for a base amount of $900,665 ($915,815 - $15,150) for a new total not to exceed amount of $1,294,853 (excludes fees for City of Corona plan check and building permits). Agenda Item 9 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2005-06 Amount: $900,665 Federal Transit Administration: Source of Funds: $130,000 State Transportation Improvement Budget Adjustment: N Program: $770,665 221-33-81102 Final Design = $800,665 P3808 GLA No.: 221-33-81120 Material Testing = $50,000 P3808 221-33-81105 Surveying = $50,000 P3808 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \ite,u4,14 Date: 10/04/05 Attachments: 1) A1.0 Existing Site Plan 2) A1.1 Garage Plans 1 3) Chong Partners Architecture Proposal dated September 30, 2005 Agenda Item 9 " AGENDA " " ITEM 10 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: • Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Stephanie Wiggins, Rail Department Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Trade Corridor Rail. Crossing Grade Separation Priority List PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Review the Average Daily Traf is counts for the Avenue 48/Dillon Road Crossing; and, 2) Approve the Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Trade Corridor Rail Crossing Grade Separation Priority List. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Alameda Corridor is a 20-mile freight line that connects the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles to intermodal facilities near downtown Los Angeles and generally parallels Alameda Street along most of its route. Throughout the corridor, the rail line is separated from surface street traffic, so the high volume of freight trains will not delay street traffic. After leaving the Alameda Corridor, the majority of trains turn east, destined. to intermodal terminals in the Inland Empire or to other parts of the country. This area is known as the Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Trade Corridor (Attachment 1). The rail lines of the ACE Trade Corridor pass through the San Gabriel Valley, Orange County, San Bernardino County, and Riverside County. At its March 2001 meeting, the Commission established the Riverside County ACE Trade Corridor Rail Crossing. Grade Separation Priority List based on seven factors: • Existing Vehicle Delay (1999) — weighted 20% • Future Vehicle Delay (2020) - weighted 20% • Accident Reduction/Safety (accident rate past 10 years) — weighted 20% • Distance from other grade separations Agenda Item 10 99 " Local Ranking " Emission Reduction, and " Noise Reduction (Impact on nearby residential areas). Purpose for 2005 Update Since March 2001, freight growth and population growth have increased. In addition, Commissioners have expressed a desire to update the data used in the criteria. At its March 2005 meeting, the Commission approved the use of the same evaluation criteria for the update with current data sources for all of the factors. 2001 Approved Evaluation Criteria 2005 Approved Evaluation Criteria Criteria Weight Criteria Weight Max Score Existing Vehicle Delay (1999) 20% Existing Vehicle Delay (2004) 20% 1000 Future Vehicle Delay (2020) 20% Future Vehicle Delay (2030) 20% 1000 Accident Reduction/Safety 20% Accident Reduction/Safety 20% 1000 Distance from other Grade Separations 10% Distance from other Grade Separations 10% 500 Local Ranking 10% Local Ranking 10%; 500 Emission Reduction 10% Emission Reduction 10% 500 Noise Reduction 10% Noise Reduction 10%. 500 TOTAL 100% TOTAL 100% 5000 Review of Avenue 48/Di//on Road Traffic Count Data At the Plans and Programs Committee, concern was raised about the preliminary ranking for the Avenue 48/Dillon Road crossing. This project's ranking fell from Priority Group 1 to Priority Group 3 due to a decrease in the Average Daily Traffic Count .(ADT) reported for the crossing. The 2001 priority :list identified an ADT of 30,000 for the crossing, however, the latest data identified the ADT at 10,120 for the crossing. Following the Committee meeting, staff notified all jurisdictions, via their TAC member, of the proposed ADT for each crossing and requested notification of any changes. CVAG staff provided the 2005 Traffic Census information as a source for .annual ADT for the Avenue 48/Dillon 'Road 'Crossing. This source confirmed the ADT of 10,120 which was used in the preliminary ranking provided,by the City of Coachella. Since the. Committee meeting, the City of Coachella has also provided an updated projected traffic count of 26,904 for Dillon Road for the year 2030 which is incorporated in a traffic study for the grade separation project and approved by Caltrans. The new data for the 2030 traffic count is higher than the original Agenda Item 10 " 100 I i • forecast which results in an increase in score for the vehicle delay and air quality criteria. The new score for the Avenue 48/Dillon Road crossing moves the rank up from Priority Group 3, a score of 2550, to Group 2, a score of 3150. CVAG and the County provided updated ADT for crossings in their jurisdiction which resulted in modified scores for Magnolia Avenue, Jurupa Road; Center Street, Clay Street, Broadway, Airport Drive, and Avenue 66. Results of the 2005 Update While modifications of the ADT for Avenue 48/Dillon Road and the other crossings listed above result in a change in individua rank, the overall impact of the growth in freight traffic and goods movement to Riverside County remains the same. The update reaffirms the significant delay at main line freight rail crossings within Riverside County. Attachment 2 provides a list of the preliminary ranking_ by priority group of the at -grade crossings. Below are summary measures of delay designed to illustrate the impact to Riverside County. Gate down time is a measurement that depends on the number, length, and speed of trains passing through the crossing. Therefore, the numberis the same at each crossing of each subdivision due to the assumption that trains are traveling the speed limit on each segment. Average Gate Down Time Rail Line Gates Down (2001) Gates Down (2005) Gates Down (2030) BNSF + UP (SB SUB) 1 hr 54 min per day 3 hrs 34 min per day 8 hrs 20 min per day BNSF (SB SUB) 1 hr 17 min per day 2 hrs 26 min per day 5 hrs 29 ruin per day Yuma Main 1 hr 12 min per day 1 hr 26 min per day 3 hrs. 33 min per day UP (LA SUB) 48 min per day 1 hr 23 min per day 3 hrs 37 fnin per day Another measurement of impact is the length associated with the cars or traffic volume queuing at the grade crossings while the gates are down. Total Vehicle Queuing in Riverside County The sum of all vehicle queues at all crossings for a typical day: 2001 2005 2030 44.5 miles 81.4 miles 296.3 miles The gate down time and vehicle queuing Attachment 3. Agenda Item 10 101 ength for each crossing is identified in Total Vehicle Delay in Riverside County Total daily delay for all crossings is equivalent to the following: 2005 2030 A line of vehicles 4.5 miles long sitting (idling) for an hour. A line of vehicles 24.8 miles long sitting (idling) for an hour. Attachments: 1) Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Trade Corridor 2) 2005 Rail Crossing Priority List Update (preliminary); 3) 2005 Gate Down Time & Length of Queue. Waiting for Train Crossings 4) 2005 vs. 2001 Priority List Comparison (preliminary) Agenda Item 10 102 ATTACHMENT 1 • SOVO iIVH-3id13va:Koren. S3Nn 1IN2133 YIN VS N3H.0ON Naiorm?JNS • Agenda Item 10 ATTACHMENT 2 2005 Rail Crossing Grade Separation Priority List (Prelimina Overall Rail Cross Weighted Line Street Jurisdiction Score Group BNSF (SB SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside.County 4450 1 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Chicago Av Riverside 4380 1 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 3rd St Riverside 4060 1 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Columbia Av (BNSF) Riverside 4000 1 BNSF (SB SUB) McKinley St Corona 3950 1 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Iowa Av (BNSF) Riverside 3820 1 BNSF (SB SUB) Adams St II Riverside 3665 1 BNSF (SB SUB) Smith Av Corona 3613 2 _ UP (YUMA MAIN) Sunset Av Banning 3500 2 BNSF (SB SUB) Tyler St Riverside 3500 2 BNSF (SB SUB) Mary St Riverside 3465 2 UP (YUMA MAIN) Hargrave St Banning 3425 2 BNSF (SB SUB) Auto Center Dr Corona 3388 2 UP (LA SUB) Jurupa Rd Riverside Counter 3380 2 BNSF (SB SUB) Madison St Riverside 3340 2 UP (LA SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside 3330 2 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Center St II Riverside County 3323 2 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Kansas Av (BNSF) Riverside 3220 2 UP (LA SUB_ Clay St Riverside County 3214 2 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 48/Dillon Road Indio/Coachella 3150 2 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 7th St Riverside 3135 2 BNSF (SB SUB) Pierce St Riverside 3090 3 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Palmyrita Av (UP) Riverside 3010 3 BNSF (SB SUB) Railroad St Corona 2925 3 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Spruce St (BNSF) Riverside 2845 3 UP (LA SUB) Riverside Av Riverside 2810 3 BNSF (SB SUB) Buchanan St Riverside 2800 3 BNSF & UP (RIV) Cridge St Riverside 2650 3 UP (LA SUB) Streeter Av Riverside 2540 3 BNSF (SB SUB) Washington Stl Riverside 2530 3 UP (LA SUB) Brockton Av Riverside 2400 3 BNSF (SB SUB) Jefferson St Riverside 2380 3 UP (YUMA MAIN) San Gorgonio Av Banning 2375 3 UP (YUMA MAIN) 22nd St Banning 2375 3 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 52 Coachella 2233 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) San Timoteo Canyon Rd Calimesa 2175 4 BNSF (SB SUB) Cota St Corona 2113 4 _ UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 66 Riverside County 2091 4 UP (LA SUB) Bellgrave Av Riverside County 1984 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) Vele Av Beaumont 1983 4 UP (LA SUB) Palm Av Riverside 1965 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) Airport Drive Riverside County 1882 4 BNSF (SB SUBS Jackson St Riverside 1805 4 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Main St Riverside County 1727 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) Apache Trail Riverside County 1695 4 UP (LA SUB) Rutile St Riverside County 1668 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) Broadway Riverside County 1586 4 BNSF (SB SUB) Harrison St Riverside 1495 4 BNSF (SB SUB) Joy St II Corona 1475 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) California Av Beaumont 1450 4 UP (LA SUB) Mountain View Av Riverside 1400 4 BNSF (SB SUB) Radio Rd II Corona 1400 4 UP (LA SUB) Panorama Rd II Riverside 1265 4 BNSF (SB SUB) Jane St Riverside 1210 5 UP (YUMA MAIN) Tipton Rd Palm Springs 1100 5. UP (YUMA MAIN) Pennsylvania Av Beaumont 917 5 BNSF (SB SUB) Sheridan St Corona 813 5 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 54 Coachella 767 5 BNSF (SB SUB) Gibson St II Riverside 695 5 104 ATTACHMENT 3 Summary Measurement of Impact (Gate Down Time & Vehicle Queue Train Line Location Jurisdiction Gates Down Time Per Day 2005 Gates Down Time Per Day 2030 Total Daily Queue Length (miles) 2005 Total Daily Queue Length (miles) 2030- UP (LA SUB) Bellgrave Av Riverside County 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.03 4.43 UP (LA SUB) Rutile St Riverside County 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.24 - 3.94 UP (LA SUB) Jurupa Rd Riverside County 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.57 6.98 UP (LA SUB) Clay St Riverside County 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.72 5.46 UP (LA SUB) Mountain View Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 0.27- 1.06 UP (LA SUB) Streeter Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 0.81 2.88 UP (LA SUB) Palm Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.33 4.03 UP (LA SUB) Brockton Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 0.91 2.73 UP (LA SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.28 4.20 UP (LA SUB) Riverside Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.88 5.20 UP (LA SUB) Panorama Rd Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 0.76 • 2.52 BNSF (SB SUB) Auto Center Dr Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.44 12.42 BNSF (SB SUB) Smith Av Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 2.15 9.60 BNSF (SB SUB) Railroad St Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min . 1.24 7.65 BNSF (SB SUB) Cote St Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.35 6.50 BNSF (SB SUB) Sheridan St Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 0.63 1.76 BNSF (SB SUB) Joy St Corona 2 hrs 26 min ' 5 hrs 29 min 1.46 5.72 BNSF (SB SUB) Radio Rd Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.13 . - 3.16 BNSF (SB SUB) McKinley St Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 4.61 13.80 BNSF (SB SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside County 2 hrs 26min5 hrs 29 min -2.40 7.77 BNSF (SB SUB) Buchanan St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 0.96 4.27 BNSF (SB SUB) Pierce St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 2.35 7.68 BNSF (SB SUB) Tyler St Riverside I 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.67 6.27 BNSF (SB SUB) Harrison St Riverside I 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.45 4.32 BNSF (SB SUB) Gibson St Riverside I 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 0.66 1.84 BNSF (SB SUB) Jackson St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 0.78 1.97 BNSF (SB SUB) Adams St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 3.37 8.36 BNSF (SB SUB) Jefferson St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.79 - 4.99 BNSF (SB SUB) Madison St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.48 - 3.37 BNSF (SB SUB) Washington St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.99 5.87 BNSF (SB SUB) Mary St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.34 4.19 BNSF (SB SUB) Jane St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.04 2.91 BNSF & UP (RIV) Cridge St Riverside 3 hrs 54 min 7 hrs 53 min 2.83 7.93 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 7th St Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 1.30 6.84 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 3rd St Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 2.34 7.49 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Kansas Av Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 2.56 8.28 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Spruce St Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 0.31 3.08 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Chicago Av Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 1.93 7.68 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Columbia Av Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 2.15 7.39 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Palmyrita Av Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 0.76 5.29 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Iowa Av Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 2.86 10.59 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Center St Riverside County 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min - 1.45 5.36 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Main St Riverside County 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min - 0.79 2.77 UP (YUMA MAIN) San Timoteo Canyon Rd Calimesa 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.97 3.33 UP (YUMA MAIN) Vials Av Beaumont 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.01 0.04 UP (YUMA MAIN) California Av Beaumont I 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.62 2.93 UP (YUMA MAIN) Pennsylvania Av Beaumont 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.28 2.01 UP (YUMA MAIN) Sunset Av Banning I 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 2.06 7.25 UP (YUMA MAIN) 22nd St Banning II 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 1.87 4.56 UP (YUMA MAIN) San Gorgonio Av Banning II 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 1.77 5.45 UP (YUMA MAIN) Hargrave St Banning 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 2.13 10.76 UP (YUMA MAIN) Apache Trail Riverside County 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.22 6.01 UP (YUMA MAIN) Broadway Riverside County 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.66 2.02 UP (YUMA MAIN) Tipton Rd Palm Springs 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.01 0.04 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 48/ Dillon Rd Indio/Coachella 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.62 4.02 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 52 Coachella 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.82 2.50 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 54 Coachella 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.07 0.21 UP (YUMA MAIN) Airport Boulevard Riverside County 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.72 1.10 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 66 Riverside County- 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 1.13 3.45 TOTALS 81.35 296.25 105 2005 Update (Preliminary) vs 2001 Priority List Rail Line Cross Street Jurisdiction 2001 Final Group Score 2001 °% Score Change BNSF (SB SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside County 4450 1 1 3600 23.6% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Chicago Av Riverside 4380 1 1 3440 27.3% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 3rd St Riverside 4060 1 1 4260 -4.7% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Columbia Av (BNSF) Riverside 4000 1 2 2940 36.1 % BNSF (SB SUB) McKinley St Corona 3950 1 1 3600 9.7% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Iowa Av (BNSF) Riverside 3820 1 1 3880 -1.5% BNSF (SB SUB) Adams St Riverside 3665 1 3 2400 52.7% BNSF ISB SUB) Smith Av Corona 3613 2 3 2113 71.0% UP (YUMA MAIN) Sunset Av Banning 3500 2 2 2675 30.8% BNSF (SB SUB) Tyler St Riverside 3500 2 3 2460 42.3% BNSF (SB SUB) Mary St Riverside 3465 2 2 3320 4.4% UP (YUMA MAIN) Hargrave St Banning 3425 2 3 2500 37.0% BNSF (SB SUB) Auto Center Dr Corona 3388 2 2 2738 23.7% UP SUB) Rd (LA . Jurupa -Riverside-County- 3380- 2 2 2650 -27.5%- BNSF (SB SUB) Madison St Riverside 3340 2 3 2240 49.1 % UP (LA SUB) . Magnolia Av Riverside 3330 2 2 3060 8.8°% BNSF & UP ISB SUB) Center St Riverside County 3323 2 3 2500 32.9% BNSF & UP ISB SUB) Kansas Av (BNSF) Riverside 3220 2 3 2480 29.8% UP (LA SUB) Clay St Riverside County 3214 2 4 1700 89.0% UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 48/Dillon Road Indio/Coachella 3150 2 1 3775 -16.6°% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 7th St Riverside 3135 2 3 2000 56.8% BNSF ISB SUB) Pierce St Riverside 3090 3 3 1885 63.9% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Palmyrita Av (UP) Riverside 3010 3 4 1020 195.1 % BNSF ISB SUB) • Railroad St Corona 2925 3 3 1975 .48.1 % BNSF 8i UP ISB SUB) Spruce St (BNSF) Riverside 2845 3 1 3180 -10.5% UP (LA SUB) Riverside Av • Riverside 2810 3 2 '3060 -8.2% BNSF (SB SUB) Buchanan St Riverside 2800 3 3 1880 48.9% BNSF & UP (RIV) Cridge St Riverside 2650 3 2 2820 -6.0% UP (LA SUB) Streeter Av Riverside 2540 3 1 3000 -15.3% BNSF (SB SUB) Washington St Riverside 2530 3 2 2520 0.4% UP (LA SUB) Brockton Av Riverside 2400 3 3 2480 -3.2% BNSF (SB SUB) Jefferson St Riverside 2380 3 4 1740 36.8% UP (YUMA MAIN) San Gorgonio Av Banning 2375 3 4 1625 46.2% UP (YUMA MAIN) 22nd St Banning 2375 3 4 1750 35.7% 106 • ATTACHMENT 4 Reasons for Net Score Change (VHD= vehicle hours of delay) T accident & local rank T VHD2005, accident, noise, local rank 4, VHD 2030 & accident T VHD 2030, accident, air quality, local rank T accident y accident 9` all factors except nearby Gseps T VHD 2005 & 2030 & air quality T VHD 2005, air quality & local rank T VHD 2005 & 2030 & accident T local rank T VHD 2005 & 2030 & accident T VHD 2030.5, accident T VH1 2030,.accident, air_quality,:&.Iocal_rank T VHD 2005, accident, & air quality T local rank T all factors except nearby Gseps T VHD 2005, noise, & local rank T VHD 2005, accident, & air quality correction VHD 2005, 2030 & air quality T VHD 2005, air quality & local rank T VHD 2005 & 2030, air quality, & local rank T accident & air quality & local rank T VHD 2030 & air quality & local rank J VHD 2030 & air quality L VHD 2005 T accident and local rank J VHD 2030& accident 4, VHD 2005 & accident �o change 4, VHD 2005 & 2030 T local rank T VHD 2030 & air quality T VHD 2005 Rail Line. UP (YUMA MAIN) UP(YUMA MAIN) BNSF (SB SUB). _ UP (YUMA MAIN) UP (LA SUB) UP (YUMA MAIN) UP (LA SUB) UP (YUMA MAIN) BNSF, (SB SUB) . BNSF & UP. (SB SUB) UP (YUMA MAIN) UP (LA SUB) UP (YUMA MAIN) BNSF (SB SUB) BNSF (SB SUB) UP (YUMA MAIN) UP,(LA SUB) BNSF (SB SUB) .. UP (LA -SUB/ BNSF (SB SUB). UP (YUMA MAIN). UP (YUMA MAIN) Cross Street Avenue 52 San Timoteo Canyon Rd Cota St Avenue 66 Bellgrave Av Viele Av Palm Av Airport Drive Jackson St Main St Apache .Trail Rutile St Broadway Harrisdn St Joy. St California Av Mountain View Av Radio Rd Panorama Rd Jane St Tipton Rd Pennsylvania Av Jurisdiction Coachella Calimesa Corona Riverside County Riverside County . Beaumont Riverside Riverside County Riverside Riverside County Riverside County Riverside County Riverside, County Riverside Corona Beaumont Riverside'. Corona Riverside Riverside Palm Springs Beaumont 2233 2175 2113 2091 1984 1983 1965 1882 1805 1727 1695. 1668 1586 1495 1475 1450 1400. 1400. 1265,. 1210 1100 917 4. 4 4 4 4 4 4_ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4. 4 4 4 5 5 5 2001 Final Group 2 3 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 3 3 5' 5 4 4 not rated 4 ATTACHMENT 4 2001 % Score Reasons for Net Score Change Score Change (VHD= vehicle hours of delay) 4, accident 2750 2225. 1713 950 1700 1133. 1820 1450 1755, 1350 800 1350 1950 1740 1850 2200 1000 563 1060. 1200. not rated 1667 -18.8% -2.2 % 23.3% 120.1 % 16.7% 75.1 % 8.0% 29.8 % 2:8% 27.9% 111.9% • 23.6% -18.6% 14.1% 20.3% -34.1 % 40.0 % 148.7 % 19.3 % 0.8 % not rated -45.0% BNSF (SB SUB) UP (YUMA MAIN) Sheridan St - Avenue 54 Corona Coachella, 813. 767 BNSF (SB SUB) Gibson St Riverside 695 5 5 5 4 5 1125 825 -27,8% -7.1 % 4 1220 • -43.0% 4 VHD 2030, air quality & noise T Idcalrank T accident t air quality T accident t air quality T local rank T local rank- 'j� air quality & noise T VHD 2030 & air quality T VHD 2030 & air quality 4, VHD 2030 y VHD 2005 & 2030 & air quality 4, accident 4 VHD 2030 & air quality T accident T VHD 2005 & 2030 T air quality no change N/A 4, VHD 2030 & air quality 4- VHD 2005 & 2030 & air quality 4, air quality 4, accident REVISION TO AGENDA ITEM 10 Additions noted by Bold Italics Deletions noted by Strikethrough RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: October 12, 2005 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Stephanie Wiggins, Rail Department Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Alameda Corridor Crossing Grade Separation East (ACE) Trade Corridor Rail Priority List PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Review the Average Daily Traffic counts for the Avenue 48/Dillon Road Crossing; and, 2) Approve the Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Trade Corridor Rail Crossing Grade Separation Priority List based on Group Tiers. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Alameda Corridor is a 20-mile freight line that connects the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles to intermodal facilities near downtown Los Angeles and generally parallels Alameda Street along most of its route. Throughout the corridor, the rail line is separated from surface street traffic, so the high volume of freight trains will not delay street traffic. After leaving the Alameda Corridor, the majority of trains turn east, destined to intermodal terminals in the Inland Empire or to other parts of the country. This area is known as the Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Trade Corridor (Attachment 1). The rail lines of the ACE Trade Corridor pass through the San Gabriel Valley, Orange County, San Bernardino County, and Riverside County. At its March 2001 meeting, the Commiss'on established the Riverside County ACE Trade Corridor Rail Crossing Grade Separation Priority List based on seven factors: • Existing Vehicle Delay (1999) — weighted 20% • Future Vehicle Delay (2020) — weighted 20% • Accident Reduction/Safety (accident rate past 10 years) — weighted 20% Agenda Item 10 " Distance from other grade separations " Local Ranking " Emission Reduction, and " Noise Reduction (Impact on nearby residential areas). Purpose for 2005 Update Since March 2001, freight growth and population growth have increased. In addition, Commissioners have expressed a desire to update the data used in the criteria. At its March 2005 meeting, the Commission approved the use of the same evaluation criteria for the update with current data sources for all of the factors. 2001 Approved Evaluation Criteria 2005 Approved Evaluation Criteria Criteria Weight Criteria Weight Max Score Existing Vehicle Delay (1999) 20% Existing Vehicle Delay (2004) 20% 1000 Future Vehicle Delay (2020) 20% Future Vehicle Delay (2030) 20% 1000 Accident Reduction/Safety 20% Accident Reduction/Safety 20% 1000 Distance from other Grade Separations 10% Distance from other Grade 11 Separations 10% 500 Local Ranking 10% Local Ranking 10% 500 Emission Reduction 10% Emission Reduction 10% 500 Noise Reduction 10% Noise Reduction 10% 500 TOTAL 100% TOTAL 100% 5000 Review of Avenue 48/Dillon Road Traffic Count Data At the Plans and Programs Committee, concern was raised about the preliminary ranking for the Avenue 48/Dillon Road crossing. This projectes ranking fell from Priority Group 1 to Priority Group 3 due to a decrease in the Average Daily Traffic Count (ADT) reported for the crossing. The 2001 priority list identified an ADT of 30,000 for the crossing, however, the latest data identified the ADT at 10,120 for the crossing. Following the Committee meeting, staff notified all jurisdictions, via their TAC member, of the proposed ADT for each crossing and requested notification of any changes. CVAG staff provided the 2005 Traffic Census information as a source for annual ADT for the Avenue 48/Dillon Road Crossing. This source confirmed the ADT of 10,120 which was used in the preliminary ranking provided by the City of Coachella. Since the Committee meeting, the City of Coachella has also provided an updated projected traffic count of 26,904 for Dillon Road for the year 2030 which is incorporated in a traffic study for the grade separation project and approved by Agenda Item 10 Caltrans. The new data for the 2030 traffic count is higher than the original forecast which results in an increase in score for the vehicle delay and air quality criteria. The new score for the Avenue 48/Dillon Road crossing moves the rank up from Priority Group 3, a score of 2550, to Group 2, a score of '3450 3325. CVAG and the County provided updated ADT for crossings in their jurisdiction which resulted in modified scores for Magnolia Avenue, Jurupa Road, Center Street, Clay Street, Broadway, Airport Drive, and Avenue 66. Since the publication of the Agenda, the consultant has identified two additional mainline at -grade crossings, Avenue 58 and Avenue 62 in the unincorporated area of the County. Staff has also confirmed that the Kansas Avenue at -grade crossing is permanently closed due to the 60/91/215 Interchange Project. The resulting impact of the addition of the two crossings and deletion of the closed Kansas Avenue crossing results in revised scores for 27 crossings (13 Riverside County crossings, 7 Riverside crossings, 3 Corona crossings, and 1 crossing in Banning, Calimesa, Indio/Coachella, and Beaumont). Staff is requesting approval of the list based upon tiers because the overall project rankings are not anticipated to change. Results of the 2005 Update While modifications of the ADT for Avenue 48/Dillon Road and the other crossings listed above result in a change in individual score, the overall impact of the growth in freight traffic and goods movement to Riverside County remains the same. The update reaffirms the significant delay at main line freight rail crossings within Riverside County. Attachment 2 provides a list of the preliminary ranking by priority group of the at -grade crossings. Below are summary measures of delay designed to illustrate the impact to Riverside County. Gate down time is a measurement that depends on the number, length, and speed of trains passing through the crossing. Therefore, the number is the same at each crossing of each subdivision due to the assumption that trains are traveling the speed limit on each segment. Average Gate Down Time Rail Line Gates Down (2001) Gates Down (2005) Gates Down (2030) BNSF + UP (SB SUB) 1 hr 54 min per day 3 hrs 34 min per day 8 hrs 20 min per day BNSF (SB SUB) 1 hr 17 min per day 2 hrs 26 min per day 5 hrs 29 min per day Yuma Main 1 hr 12 min per day 1 hr 26 min per day 3 hrs 33 min per day UP (LA SUB) 48 min per day 1 hr 23 min per day 3 hrs 37 min per day Another measurement of impact is the length associated with the cars or traffic volume queuing at the grade crossings while the gates are down. Agenda Item 10 Total Vehicle Queuing in Riverside County The sum of all vehicle queues at all crossings for a typical day: 2001 2005 2030 44.5 miles 81,4 78.43 miles 296.3 289.06 miles The gate down time and vehicle queuing Attachment 3. Total Vehicle Delay in Riverside County length for each crossing is identified in Total daily delay for all crossings is equivalent to the following: 2005 2030 A line of vehicles 4.5 miles long sitting (idling) for an hour. A line of vehicles 24.8 miles long sitting idling) for an hour. Attachments: 1) Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Trade Corridor 2) 2005 Rail Crossing Priority List Update (preliminary) 3) 2005 Gate Down Time & Length of Queue Waiting for Train Crossings 4) 2005 vs. 2001 Priority List Comparison (preliminary) Agenda Item 10 ATTACHMENT SOVONIIVN 3IADVd NOINI1 IMEISIMEN SH1111V213A V1NVS N3141 10N NOlON11d118 Agenda Item 10 ATTACHMENT 2 2005 Rail Crossing Grade Separation Priority List (Prelimina Overall Rail Cross Weighted Line Street Jurisdiction Score Group BNSF (SB SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside County 4459 4525 1 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Chicago Av Riverside 4380 1 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 3rd St Riverside 4060 1 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Columbia Av (BNSF) Riverside 4000 1 BNSF (SB SUB) McKinley St Corona 3950 1 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Iowa Av (BNSF) Riverside 3820 1 BNSF (SB SUB) Adams St Riverside 3665 1 BNSF (SB SUB) Smith Av Corona 3613 2 UP (YUMA MAIN) Sunset Av Banning 3500 2 BNSF (SB SUB) Tyler St Riverside 3500 2 BNSF (SB SUB) Mary St Riverside 3465 2 UP (LA SUB) Jurupa Rd Riverside County 3380 3462 2 BNSF (SB SUB) Auto Center D Corona 3388 3438 2 UP (YUMA MAIN) Hargrave St Banning 3425 2 UP (LA SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside 3330 3380 2 BNSF (SB SUB) Madison St Riverside 3340 2 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 48/Dillon Road Indio/Coachella 3450 3325 2 BNSF & UP SUB) Center St Riverside County 3323 3283 2 (SB BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Kansas Av-(B -SE) Rivorcidc 3220 2 UP SUB) Clay St Riverside County 3214 3235 2 (LA BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 7th St II _ Riverside 3135 2 BNSF (SB SUB) Pierce St I Riverside 3090 3 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Palmyrita Av (UP) Riverside 3010 3 BNSF (SB SUB) Railroad St Corona 2925 3 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Spruce St (BNSF) Riverside 2845 3 UP (LA SUB) Riverside Av Riverside 2810 3 BNSF (SB SUB) Buchanan St Riverside 2800 3 BNSF & UP (RIV) Cridge St Riverside 2650 3 BNSF (SB SUB) Washington St Riverside 2530 2580 3 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 62 Riverside County 2525 3 UP (LA SUB) Streeter Av Riverside 2510 2515 3 UP (LA SUB) Brockton Av Riverside 2400 3 BNSF (SB SUB) Jefferson St Riverside 2380 3 UP (YUMA MAIN) 22nd St Banning 2375 3 UP (YUMA MAIN) San Gorgonio Av Banning 2375 2300 3 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 66 Riverside County 2091 2265 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 52 Coachella 2233 4 BNSF (SB SUB) Cota St Corona 2113 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) San Timoteo Cany n Rd Calimesa 2175 2100 4 UP (LA SUB) Bellgrave Av Riverside County 4984 2048 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) Viele Av Beaumont 1983 4 UP (LA SUB) Palm Av Riverside 1965 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) Airport Drive Riverside County 4882 1892 4 BNSF (SB SUB) Jackson St Riverside 1805 4 UP (LA SUB) Rutile St Riverside County 4668 1746 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) Apache Trail Riverside County 1695 1727 4 & SUB) Main St I Riverside County 1727 1681 4 BNSF UP (SB UP (YUMA MAIN) Broadway Riverside County 1586 1604 4 BNSF (SB SUB) Harrison St Riverside 4496 1545 4 BNSF (SB SUB) Joy St Corona 1175 1525 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) California Av Beaumont 4450 1500 4 Mountain View Av Riverside 4499 1450 4 UP (LA SUB) BNSF (SB SUB) Radio Rd Corona 4430 1450 4 BNSF (SB SUB) Jane St Riverside 1210 1310 5 • 4 UP (LA SUB) Panorama Rd Riverside 4265 1290 4 UP (YUMA MAIN) Tipton Rd Palm Springs 1100 5 UP (YUMA MAIN) Pennsylvania Av Beaumont 917 5 BNSF (SB SUB) Sheridan St Corona 813 5 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 54 Coachella 767 5 BNSF (SB SUB) Gibson St I Riverside 695 5 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 58 Riverside County 638 5 as of 10/12/05 Summary Measurement of Impact (Gate Down ATTACHMENT 3 Time & Vehicle Queue) Train Line Location Jurisdiction Gates Down Time Per Day 2005 Gates Down Time Per Day 2030 Total Daily Queue Length (miles) 2005 Total Daily Queue Length (miles) 2030 UP (LA SUB) Bel!grave Av Riverside County 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.03 4.43 UP (LA SUB) Rutile St Riverside County 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.24 3.94 UP (LA SUB) Jurupa Rd Riverside County 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.57 6.98 UP (LA SUB) Clay St Riverside County 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.72 5.46 UP (LA SUB) Mountain View Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 0.27 1.06 UP (LA SUB) Streeter Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 0.81 2.88 UP (LA SUB) Palm Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.33 4.03 UP (LA SUB) Brockton Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 0.91 2.73 UP (LA SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.28 4.20 UP (LA SUB) Riverside Av Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 1.88 5.20 UP (LA SUB) Panorama Rd Riverside 1 hr 23 min 3 hrs 37 min 0.76 2.52 BNSF (SB SUB) Auto Center Dr Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.44 12.42 BNSF (SB SUB) Smith Av Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 2.15 9.60 BNSF (SB SUB) Railroad St Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.24 7.65 BNSF (SB SUB) Cota St Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1,35 6.50 BNSF (SB SUB) Sheridan St Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 0.63 1.76 BNSF (SB SUB) Joy St Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.46 5.72 BNSF (SB SUB) Radio Rd Corona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.13 3.16 BNSF (SB SUB) McKinley St Carona 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 4.61 13.80 BNSF (SB SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside County 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 2.40 7.77 BNSF (SB SUB) Buchanan St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 0.96 4.27 BNSF (SB SUB) Pierce St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 2.35 7.68 BNSF (SB SUB) Tyler St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.67 6.27 BNSF (SB SUB) Harrison St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.45 4.32 BNSF (SB SUB) Gibson St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 0.66 1.84 BNSF (SB SUB) Jackson St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 0.78 1.97 BNSF (SB SUB) Adams St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 3.37 8.36 _ BNSF (SB SUB) Jefferson St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.79 4.99 BNSF (SB SUB) Madison St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.48 3.37 BNSF (SB SUB) Washington St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.99 5.87 BNSF (SB SUB) Mary St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.34 4.19 BNSF (SB SUB) Jane St Riverside 2 hrs 26 min 5 hrs 29 min 1.04 2.91 BNSF & UP (RIV) Cridge St Riverside 3 hrs 54 min 7 hrs 53 min 2.83 7.93 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 7th St Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 1.30 6.84 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 3rd St Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 2.34 7.49 Kansas Av Riverside 3 hrs 34 8 hrs 20 2 56 8,2-8 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) min min BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Spruce St Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 0.31 3.08 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Chicago Av Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 1.93 7.68 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Columbia Av Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 2.15 7.39 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Palmyrita Av - Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 0.76 5.29 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Iowa Av Riverside 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 2.86 10.59 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Center St Riverside County 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 1.45 5.36 BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Main St Riverside County 3 hrs 34 min 8 hrs 20 min 0.79 2.77 UP (YUMA MAIN) San Timoteo Canyon Rd Calimesa 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0,9-7 .04 3.33 .13 UP (YUMA MAIN) Viele Av Beaumont 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.01 0.04 UP (YUMA MAIN) California Av Beaumont 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.62 2.93 UP (YUMA MAIN) - Pennsylvania Av Beaumont 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.28 2.01 UP (YUMA MAIN) Sunset Av Banning M 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 2.06 7.25 UP (YUMA MAIN) 22nd St Banning M 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 1.87 4.56 UP (YUMA MAIN) San Gorgonio Av Banning M 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 1.77 5.45 UP (YUMA MAIN) Hargrave St Banning 1 hr 26. min 3 hrs 33 min 2.13 10.76 UP (YUMA MAIN) Apache Trail Riverside County 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.22 6.01 _ UP (YUMA MAIN) Broadway Riverside County 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.66 2.02 UP (YUMA MAIN) Tipton Rd Palm Springs 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.01 0.04 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 48/ Dillon Rd Indio/Coachella 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0,82 .71 4.02 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 52 Coachella; 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.82 2.50 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 54 Coachella 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.07 0.21 UP (YUMA MAIN) Airport Boulevard Riverside County 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.72 1.10 ,UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 58 Riverside County 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.19 0.58 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 62 Riverside County 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 0.30 3.71 UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 66 Riverside County 1 hr 26 min 3 hrs 33 min 1.13 3.45 TOTALS 78.43 289.06 as of 10/12/05 2005 Update (Preliminary) vs 2001 Priority List Lin Cross Street Jurisdiction Overall Weighted Score =`2005 2001 Priority Final _Group , Group Score 2001 % Score Change BNSF (SB SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside County 4525 1 1 3600 25.7% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Chicago Av Riverside 4380 1 1 3440 27.3% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 3rd St Riverside 4060 1 1 4260 -4.7% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Columbia Av (BNSF) Riverside 4000 1 2 2940 36.1 % BNSF (SB SUB) McKinley St Corona 3950 1 1 3600 9.7% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Iowa Av (BNSF) Riverside 3820 1 1 3880 -1.5% BNSF (SB SUB) Adams St Riverside 3665 1 3 2400 52.7% BNSF (SB SUB) Smith Av Corona 3613 2 3 2113 71.0`Yo UP (YUMA MAIN) Sunset Av Banning 3500 2 2 2675 30.8% BNSF (SB SUB) Tyler St Riverside 3500 2 3 2460 42.3% BNSF (SB SUB) Mary St Riverside 3465 2 2 3320 4.4% UP (YUMA MAIN) Hargrave St Banning 3425 2 3 2500 37.0% BNSF (SB SUB) Auto Center Dr Corona 3438 2 2 2738 25.6% UP (LA SUB) Jurupa Rd Riverside County 3462 2 2 2650 -30.-6%' BNSF (SB SUB) Madison St Riverside 3340 2 3 2240 49.1 % UP (LA SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside 3380 2 2 3060 10.5% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Center St Riverside County 3283 2 3 2500 31.3% gale 3220 2 3 2180 2-9,81% BNSF & UP (SB SUBy Kansas Av (BNSF)- UP ILA SUB) Clay St Riverside County 3235 2 4 1700 90.3% UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 48/Dillon Road Indio/Coachella 3325 2 1 3775 -11.9% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 7th St Riverside 3135 2 3 2000 56.8% BNSF (SB SUB) Pierce St Riverside 3090 3 3 1885 63.9% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Palmyrita Av (UP) Riverside 3010 3 4 1020 195.1 % BNSF (SB SUB) Railroad St Corona 2925 3 3 1975 48.1 % BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Spruce St (BNSF) Riverside 2845 3 1 3180 -10.5% UP (LA SUB) Riverside Av Riverside 2810 3 2 3060 -8.2% BNSF (SB SUB) Buchanan St Riverside 2800 3 3 1880 48.9% BNSF & UP (RIV) Cridge St Riverside 2650 3 2 2820 -6.0% UP (LA SUB) Streeter Av Riverside 2515 3 1 3000 -16.2% BNSF (SB SUB) Washington St Riverside 2580 3 2 2520 2.4% UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 62 Riverside County 2569 3 not rated not rated not rated UP (LA SUB) Brockton Av Riverside 2400 3 3 2480 -3.2% BNSF (SB SUB) Jefferson St Riverside 2380 3 4 1740 36.8% UP (YUMA MAIN) San Gorgonio Av Banning 2300 3 4 1625 41.5% ATTACHMENT 4 Reasons for Net Score Change (VHD= vehicle hours of delay) T accident & local rank T VHD 2005, accident, noise, local rank 4 VHD 2030 & accident T VHD 2030, accident, air quality, local rank T accident 4- accident T all factors except nearby Gseps T VHD 2005 & 2030 & air quality T VHD 2005, air quality & local rank T VHD 2005 & 2030 & accident T local rank T VHD 2005 & 2030 & accident T VHD 2030 & accident T=VHD 2030,-accident,-airqualiEy7 &-Focal rank T VHD 2005, accident, & air quality T local rank I` all factors except nearby Gseps P VHD 2005, noise, &-local-rank T VHD 2005, accident, & air quality orrection VHD 2005, 2030 & air quality T VHD 2005, air quality & local rank T VHD 2005 & 2030, air quality, & local rank T accident & air quality & local rank T VHD 2030 & air quality & local rank y VHD 2030 & air quality y VHD 2005 T accident and local rank y VHD 2030 & accident 4 VHD 2005 & accident no change N/A 4- VHD 2005 & 2030 Is local rank T VHD 2030 & air quality as of 10/12/05 Rail Line Cross Street Jurisdiction Overall Weighted_ Score ' 2005 2001 riority Final Group Group Score 2001 % Score Change UP (YUMA MAIN) 22nd St Banning 2375 3 4 1750 35.7% UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 52 Coachella 2233 4 2 2750 -18.8% UP (YUMA MAIN) San Timoteo Canyon Rd Calimesa 2100 4 3 2225 -5.6% BNSF (SB SUB) Cota St Corona 2113 4 4 1713 23.3% UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 66 Riverside County 2265 4 5 950 138.4% UP (LA SUB) Bellgrave Av Riverside County 2048 4 4 1700 20.5% UP (YUMA MAIN) Viele Av Beaumont 1983 4 4 1133 75.1 % UP ILA SUB) Palm Av Riverside 1965 4 3 1820 8.0% UP (YUMA MAIN) Airport Drive Riverside County 1892 4 4 1450 30.5% BNSF (SB SUB) Jackson St Riverside 1805 4 4 1755 2.8% BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Main St Riverside County 1681 4 4 1350 24.5% UP (YUMA MAIN) Apache Trail Riverside County 1727 4 5 800 115.9% UP ILA SUB) Rutile St Riverside County 1746 4 4 1350 29.3% UP (YUMA MAIN) Broadway Riverside. County 1604 4 3 1950 -17.7% BNSF (SB SUB) Harrison St Riverside 1545 4 4 1740 -17.2% BNSF ISB SUB) Joy St Corona 1525 4 3 1850 -17.6% UP (YUMA MAIN) California Av Beaumont 1500 4 3 2200 -31.8% UP (LA SUB) Mountain View Av Riverside 1450 4 5 1000 45.0% BNSF ISB SUB) Radio Rd Corona 1450 4 5 563 157.5% UP (LA SUB) Panorama Rd Riverside 1290 4 4 1060 21.7% BNSF (SB SUB) Jane St Riverside 1310 4 4 1200 9.2% UP (YUMA MAIN) Tipton Rd Palm Springs 1 100 5 not rated not rated not rated UP (YUMA MAIN) Pennsylvania Av Beaumont 917 5 4 1667 -45.0% BNSF (SB SUB) Sheridan St Corona 813 5 4 1125 -27.8% UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 54 Coachella 767 5 5 825 -7.1 % BNSF (SB SUB) Gibson St Riverside 695 5 4 1220 -43.0% UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 58 Riverside County 638 5 not rated not rated not rated ATTACHMENT 4 Reasons for Net Score Change IVHD= vehicle hours of delay) T VHD 2005 4 accident 4- VHD 2030, air quality & noise T local rank T accident T air quality T accident T air quality 'I` local rank T local rank T air quality & noise T VHD 2030 & air quality T VHD 2030 & air quality 4- VHD 2030 VHD 2005 & 2030 & air quality 4 accident y VHD 2030 & air quality T accident T VHD 2005 & 2030 T air quality no change NIA 4- VHD 2030 & air quality 4- VHD 2005 & 2030 & air quality 4 air quality 4 accident N/A as of 10/12/05