HomeMy Public PortalAbout10 October 28, 2005 Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study PolicyTN—Kopenhaver]
74544
NK/JS/HS/EH/CB
i'R�ners:.�ce..,,ry
OCTA T•*,,,s o„ Commission
AGENDA
Riverside County — Orange County Major Investment Study Policy Committee Meeting
Committee Members
Bill Campbell, Chair
Jeff Miller, Vice Chair
Art Brown
Bob Buster
Carolyn Cavecche
Michael Duvall
Frank Hall
Bob Magee
Ameal Moore
Michael Perovich
Curt Pringle
Cindy Quon
Susan Ritschel
Ken Ryan
John Tavaglione
Alan Wapner
Roy Wolfe
E EME
OCT :4 NO
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Board Room
County Regional Complex
4080 Lemon Street, First Floor
(� Riverside, California 92502-2208
Friday, October 28, 2005, at 9:00 a.m.
Rini Lip IDE COUNT I
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to
participate in this meeting should contact the OCTA Clerk of the Board, telephone
(714) 560-5676, no less than two (2) business days prior to this meeting to enable OCTA to
make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.
Call to Order
Chairman Campbell
Pledge of Allegiance
Committee Member Moore
Agenda Descriptions
The agenda descriptions are intended to give notice to members of the public of a general
summary of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The posting of the recommended
actions does not indicate what action will be taken. The Committee may take any action which it
deems to be appropriate on the agenda item and is not limited in any way by the notice of the
recommended action.
Public Comments on Agenda Items
Members of the public wishing to address the Committee regarding any item appearing on the
agenda may do so by completing a Speaker's Card and submitting it to the Clerk of the Board.
Speakers will be recognized by the Chairman at the time the agenda item is to be considered. A
speaker's comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes.
HH.35.02
Page 1 of 3
^'"jt(verstdeCouxry
OcTA �('ransportaffott Co»rmtsstow
AGENDA
Riverside County - Orange County Major investment Study Policy Committee Meeting
Special Matters
There are no Special Calendar Matters.
Consent Calendar
1. Approval of Minutes
Of the July 15, 2005, Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study
Policy Committee meeting.
Regular Calendar
2. Strategic Alternatives. Technical Evaluation
Paul Taylor, OCTA, Executive Director of Planning, Development and Commuter
Services
Overview
Technical evaluation is under way for the three alternatives recommended by the
Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study Policy Committee in
July 2005. An overview of the altematives, cost estimates, impacts and benefits,
and preliminary technical findings is attached for review and comment.
Recommendations
A. Receive and file as an information item.
B. Provide direction to staff on issues for further technical evaluation in
developing the Locally Preferred Strategy.
C. Direct staff to return on November 18, 2005, with recommendations for a
Locally Preferred Strategy.
•
•
Page 2 of 3
" _ " ' R i a s i 4 e C o u n t y
o c i a
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
A G E N D A
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y O r a n g e C o u n t y M a j o r I n v e s t m e n t S t u d y P o l i c y C o m m i t t e e M e e t i n g
O t h e r M a t t e r s
3 . P u b l i c I n v o l v e m e n t P r o g r a m U p d a t e
T a m a r a S . W a r r e n , O C T A , C o m m u n i t y R e l a t i o n s O f f i c e r
4 . C h a i r m a n a n d V i c e C h a i r m a n R e p o r t s
5 . C o m m i t t e e M e m b e r s ' R e p o r t s
6 . P u b l i c C o m m e n t s
7 . A d j o u r n m e n t
T h e n e x t r e g u l a r l y s c h e d u l e d m e e t i n g o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y - O r a n g e C o u n t y
M a j o r I n v e s t m e n t S t u d y P o l i c y C o m m i t t e e w i l l b e h e l d a t 9 : 0 0 a . m . o n
N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 0 5 , a t t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y
H e a d q u a r t e r s a t 6 0 0 S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t , F i r s t F l o o r - R o o m 1 5 4 , O r a n g e ,
C a l i f o r n i a 9 2 8 6 3 - 1 5 8 4 .
P a g e 3 o f 3
"
M I N U T E S
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y t o O r a n g e C o u n t y
M a j o r I n v e s t m e n t S t u d y
P o l i c y C o m m i t t e e
J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 0 5
n e r s t a e C o = a r t y
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
C o m m i t t e e M e m b e r s
P r e s e n t :
B r o w n , A r t
B u s t e r , B o b
C a m p b e l l , B i l l , C h a i r m a n
D u v a l l , M i c h a e l
H a l l , F r a n k
M a g e e , B o b
M i l l e r , J e f f , V i c e C h a i r m a n
M o o r e , A m e a l
P r i n g l e , C u r t
R i t s c h e l , S u s a n
R y a n , K e n
O t h e r s P r e s e n t :
B e c h t e l , C a t h y f o r E r i c H a l e y
D e b a u n , S t e v e
L e a h y , A r t h u r
Q u o n , C i n d y
T a y l o r , P a u l
W e i n e r t , L a u r e n a
1 . W e l c o m e a n d S e l f - i n t r o d u c t i o n s
T h e p l e d g e o f a l l e g i a n c e w a s c o n d u c t e d . T h e r o l l w a s c a l l e d .
2 . A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s f r o m A p r i l 2 9 , 2 0 0 5 M e e t i n g
T h e m i n u t e s o f A p r i l 2 9 , 2 0 0 5 w e r e a p p r o v e d .
3 . I t e m s
A . S t u d y P r o g r e s s a n d S c h e d u l e ( P r e s e n t a t i o n T o n y R a h i m i a n , M I S P r o j e c t
M a n a g e r )
M r . R a h i m i a n r e p o r t e d t h a t t h e P r o j e c t T e a m m e t w i t h M W D , R C T C , O C T A , C i t y o f
C o r o n a , a n d C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e s t a f f o n J u n e 8 t h t o c o o r d i n a t e a c t i v i t i e s f o r t h e
a l i g n m e n t s o f C o r r i d o r B a n d M W D ' s p r o p o s e d w a t e r p i p e l i n e t h r o u g h t h e S a n t a A n a
M o u n t a i n s a n d t h e r e l e a s e o f t h e m o r a t o r i u m i m p o s e d b y t h e C i t y o f C o r o n a t o p r o t e c t
r i g h t - o f - w a y f o r t h e p o s s i b l e a l i g n m e n t s o f C o r r i d o r B . M W D h a s s e l e c t e d t w o
c o n s u l t a n t s f o r g e o t e c h n i c a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n s a l o n g t h e i r c o r r i d o r , b u t w i l l n o t e x e c u t e
c o n t r a c t s p r i o r t o t h e f o r m a t i o n o f a J P A .
T h e P r o j e c t D e v e l o p m e n t T e a m c o n t i n u e s t o m e e t o n a m o n t h l y b a s i s t o p r o v i d e i n p u t
a n d c o m m e n t s o n t h e 1 2 " B u i l d " A l t e r n a t i v e s . A s a r e s u l t , t h e 1 2 " B u i l d " A l t e r n a t i v e s
h a v e n o w b e e n r e d u c e d t o a s e t o f 3 S t r a t e g i c A l t e r n a t i v e s , w h i c h w i l l b e p r e s e n t e d t o
t h e P o l i c y C o m m i t t e e t o d a y f o r t h e i r a p p r o v a l . U p o n a p p r o v a l , t h e P r o j e c t T e a m w i l l
b e g i n d e t a i l e d e n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d e n g i n e e r i n g e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e s e S t r a t e g i c A l t e m a t i v e s ,
d e v e l o p i n g c o n c e p t u a l p l a n s w i t h s c h e m a t i c s o f k e y f e a t u r e s . T h e s e w i l l b e s u p p o r t e d
w i t h t r a f f i c d a t a , a t o l l r e v e n u e a n a l y s i s , a n d p r e l i m i n a r y c o s t e s t i m a t e s o f e a c h S t r a t e g i c
A l t e r n a t i v e .
A D r a f t S c r e e n i n g R e p o r t w a s d i s t r i b u t e d t o t h e P r o j e c t D e v e l o p m e n t T e a m i n l a t e J u n e
a n d c o m m e n t s h a v e b e e n r e c e i v e d f r o m a n u m b e r o f c i t i e s a n d a g e n c i e s . W e e x p e c t
t h a t o t h e r a g e n c i e s w i l l r e s p o n d s h o r t l y .
I t e m 1 .
J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 0 5
1 o f 1 1 R C - O C M I S P o l i c y C o m m i t t e e
OCTA
111
MINUTES
Riverside County to Orange County
Major Investment Study
Policy Committee
July 15, 2005
RiversideCounty
Transportation Commission
The Project Team has been in contact with the local representative of the BNSF
Railroad, however we have not received an official letter from BNSF stating their position
on the joint use of their right-of-way to add capacity in the Santa Ana Canyon. The
Project Team has begun to develop alternatives for Corridor A in lieu of the BNSF RR
right-of-way, such as an elevated structure within the existing SR-91 right-of-way and the
flood control channel through the City of Corona.
Finally, the project is on schedule for completion by December of this year. The Locally
Preferred Strategy will be presented to this Committee for consideration and approval in
November. There is a one -page project summary schedule, which was included in the
packet and distributed earlier to the Committee.
Committee Member Pringle asked what had been done in trying to get a response from
the BNSF railroad. Mr. Rahimian stated that e-mails and phone calls have been made
to the local BNSF staff in San Bernardino and they are responding at the local level.
However, the local office of BNSF has not had a response from their corporate office or
headquarters in Texas. Mr. Pringle then asked if the Project Team had attempted to
contact the BNSF Headquarters? Mr. Rahimian stated that OCTA is in the process of
drafting a letter to BNSF's Headquarters. Mr. Leahy stated that there is a meeting
scheduled in August involving Los Angeles, Riverside, and Orange Counties with BNSF
and Mr. Leahy will ensure that this issue gets onto the agenda.
B. Public Involvement Program Update (Presentation - John Standiford, RCTC
Outreach Project Manager)
Mr. Standiford provided to the Committee a condensed version of the Public Outreach
Report that contains all the information displayed and gathered in the Public meetings
held for the Project to date. Mr. Standiford also stated that he had the complete report
available. There will be continued documentation of the public outreach meetings and
the Report will likely grow to two or three volumes by the time it is completed.
The actions taken by the Committee today on the Strategic Alternatives will be shared
with the public in meetings to be held in the Fall. Mr. Standiford stated that he would
appreciate any input from the committee, as this report is a work in progress.
Chairman Campbell inquired if there was any theme or tone from the public, different or
similar between the two counties. Mr. Standiford said that it is hard to generalize.
People understand that there is a mobility problem on the SR 91 and there is a growing
awareness of the amount of information available. At the last series of public meetings,
the public was overwhelmed by the amount of information and the number of
alternatives. However,they gained an understanding of the amount of information that
the technical team has accumulated and is using in the process. The public is seeing
direction and progress and at the next round of meetings, with a more focused group of
alternatives, we expect good input and comments from the public.
Committee Member Ryan stated that if the Committee could get a general sense of
shared goals from the public it would be very helpful in evaluating the altematives.
Chairman Campbell noted that this is a public meeting and welcomed participation and
comments by the public. However, he would like the staff to present first and then hear
from the public.
July 15, 2005
2 of 11 RC - OC MIS Policy Committee
MINUTES
Riverside County to Orange County witori
Major Investment Study T�p�,�cis i�
Policy Committee
July 15, 2005
C. SR-91 Maximum Feasible Widening and Strategic Alternatives/Screening
Recommendations (Presentation — Tony Rahimian, MIS Project Manager)
One of the key objectives of the MIS was to maximize, as a first priority, the
improvements to SR 91. To maximize improvements, a reasonable maximum widening
must be established for the number of lanes that can be built fully utilizing the existing
right of way and without significant impacts to adjacent properties. Using that definition,
the maximum reasonable number of lanes that can be added to the existing is the
following for each of the 3 segments of SR 91 in the Study Area.
o Segment 1, SR-55 to SR-241: add two to five lanes
o Segment 2, SR-241 to SR-71: add two to three lanes
o Segment 3, SR-71 to 1-15: add two to four lanes
Existing SR-91 Lanes
Mr. Rahimian stated it is very evident that bottlenecks occur throughout the corridor
where there are lane drops.
Constraints for Maximum Reasonable Improvements
There are a variety of types of constraints to constructing lanes beyond the maximum
described. Major constraints are listed below and identified on an aerial photograph of
the SR-91 alignment in the Study Area:
• Existing and planned residential development;
• Santa Ana River (flood control right-of-way);
• Chino Hills State Park and Coal Canyon wildlife crossing;
• Mindermann Landslide;
• Caltrans right-of-way, and
• Frontage roads accessing residential and commercial centers.
Mr. Rahimian discussed the aerial photo of SR-91 illustrating the constraints. Vice
Chairman Miller said the City of Corona has concerns about the right-of-way impacts
through Corona and he would like more information about the right-of-way requirements.
Committee Member Curt Pringle wanted to know if some shading could be provided that
shows where there would be any expansion beyond the existing Caltrans right-of-way.
Mr. Rahimian said this is a work in progress and when it is complete the members of the
committee will receive a briefing.
Chairman Campbell observed that buildings for a car dealership are being constructed at
the entry of Imperial Highway and the SR-91 on some right-of-way that had been
previously sold by Caltrans. He wanted to know if it would it be wise to buy back that
piece of land because it might be needed for the improvements. Mr. Rahimian
responded that, based upon the MIS study, that particular parcel will not be needed.
Background for Screening Evaluation
Mr. Rahimian reviewed the actions previously taken by the Policy Committee in
approving the broad corridor "bands" and the 12 build alternatives that were presented to
the public in March of 2005. Today, the formal "screening" recommendations are being
presented for approval. Alternatives that are technically flawed, comparatively less cost
effective, or environmentally inferior have been eliminated.
July 15, 2005
3 of 11 RC - OC MIS Policy Committee
MINUTES
Riverside County to Orange County
Major investment Study
Policy Committee
July 15, 2005
versideCounty
ransportation Commission
A detailed traffic study was conducted using 2030 growth projections to determine the
future volumes for each of the new corridors B and C as well as Ortega Highway (SR-
74). Corridor B was the best performing corridor, attracting an average of 105,000 daily
trips (ADT). If tolls are applied to that corridor the volumes drop to 65,000 ADT. In
contrast, Corridor C with no tolls attracts 60,000 ADT. When tolls are applied, the
volume drops to 35,000 ADT. Corridor D (Ortega Highway), also with a no toll scenario,
attracts 35,000 ADT.
Committee Member Buster inquired how many lanes were in each corridor. Mr.
Rahimian stated that for Corridor B, the no toll scenario requires 6 lanes where 2 of the
lanes could be used as reversible lanes. The toll option reduces the requirement to 4
lanes.. Corridor C, even without toll, requires only 4 lanes because of the low volume of
trips it attracts. Corridor D requires improvements to a 4 lane arterial highway.
Vice Chairman Miller wanted to know the basis for the toll. Mr. Rahimian said a detailed
toll analysis has not yet been undertaken, but will be accomplished once the Strategic
Alternatives have been approved. The analysis of the impacts of tolls on the volumes of
each of the corridors was based on the experience of TCA.
Analysis of Corridors B and C
Each of the Corridors originally had 3 facility -type options, Surface, Tunnel, and
SurfacefTunnel combination. The surface option in each corridor was previously
eliminated because it was costly and environmentally inferior. The relative costs and
acreage of environmental impacts were calculated for each remaining option in each
Corridor and then the results were compared. The results showed Corridor B to be the
better performing corridor and, coupled with its superior transportation utility, it is the
better choice.
Screening Results
On the basis of the screening evaluation, the Project Teamhas reached the following
recommendations:
• Recommended
o Maximum reasonable widening of SR-91.
o Maximize transit in all Corridors.
o Continue looking at Corridor A, despite the fact that there is no official statement
from BNSF. Also, other alternatives are being considered if BNSF right-of-way is
not available.
o Corridor B.
o Corridor D (Ortega Highway).
• Not Recommended
o Surface alignments in Corridor B.
o Corridor C (due to it's lack of performance in terms of traffic, costs, and
environmental impact).
o Dedicated truck lane (because it is not cost effective).
July 15, 2005
4 of 11 RC - OC MIS Policy Committee
MINUTES
Riverside County to Orange County
Major Investment Study
Policy Committee
July 15, 2005
'fliversideCounty
ransportation Commission
Vice Chairman Miller asked if the Project Team would eventually separate the tunnel
only from the tunnel/surface option and give one as a preferred alignment. Mr. Rahimian
responded that, after the Committee approves the Strategic Alternatives, a detailed
engineering and environmental analysis would be undertaken on all the Strategic
Alternatives, including any tunnel option they contain. This information will be available
in October.
Mr. Rahimian then outlined each of the Strategic Alternatives:
No Build Strategic Alternative
• Mag-Lev (Cal-Nev High Speed Rail) from Ontario to Anaheim;
• Add one lane in each direction on SR-91 from SR 241 to 1-15;
• Add an eastbound auxiliary lane on SR-91 from SR-241 to SR-71; and
• The extension of SR-241 (Foothill South) to 1-5.
Strategic Alternative I
• Maximize transit system;
• Maximum widening to SR-91;
• Possible managed lane changes for SR-91;
• Six lanes elevated structure in Corridor A;
• Widening of SR-74 to four lanes;
• Goods movement (BNSF track additions); and
• Reimburse TCA for loss of toll revenues on SR-241 (option).
Committee Member Pringle wanted to know if it was correct that there would be no
westbound connection to SR-91 in Corridor A. This is a big concern for his city. Mr.
Rahimian said this connection was still being studied and will be analyzed in more detail.
Committee Member Ryan expressed concerns about the elevated structure over the
BNSF railroad because of impacts to residences. The potential impacts are serious and
must be examined in greater detail.
Chairman Campbell asked Mr. Rahimian to talk about the no toll option. Mr. Rahimian
said that one of the problems of this Strategic Alternative is the traffic volume in Santa
Ana Canyon as a result of the added capacity of Corridor A and the widening of the SR-
91. The segment of SR 91 between SR-241 and SR-55 may not be sufficient to carry
that traffic based on the reasonable widening of SR-91. Additional widening will be
required on SR-55. The Project Team has identified an option to widening the SR-91
and SR-55 and thereby avoiding significant impacts to homes along the existing right-of-
way. This option is eliminating tolls on the SR-241 to SR-133, attracting the traffic that
would otherwise continue on SR 91, and then turn south on SR 55.
Committee Member Pringle asked why eastbound access to Corridor A is not
considered? Mr. Rahimian said both westbound and eastbound access will be
considered.
July 15, 2005
5 of 11 RC - OC MIS Policy Committee
OCTA
MINUTES
Riverside County to Orange Coun
Major Investment Study
Policy Committee
July 15, 2005
iverside County
'transportation Commission
Strategic Alternative II
• Maximize transit system;
• Maximum widening to SR-91;
• Possible managed lane changes for SR-91;
• Six lane freeway in Corridor B (toll free with two reversible lanes); and
• Goods movement (BNSF track additions). .
Committee Member Pringle expressed his concerns about the inclusion of Goods
Movement with the description of BNSF track additions. Would the additional tracks
take any trucks off the road and how would it benefit the public? It appears BNSF
receives the benefit of the additional capacity if it is for goods, movement. He could
understand the desire to expand Metrolink capacity, and obviously we were using the
BNSF tracks so this would be a good cooperative measure and it ought to be discussed
further, but should the agencies be the ones advocating this?
Mr. Rahimian said this was an excellent comment and he believes they' do need to
reconsider this proposal given the fact that we have not heard from BNSF, or if indeed
they refuse to allow us the extra right-of-way. Mr. Rahimian pointed out that one of the
earlier directions from this Committee in approving the Purpose and Need Statement
was to evaluate goods movement and include it in the evaluation of alternatives.
Strategic Alternative III -A
• Maximize transit system;
• Maximum widening to SR-91; .
• Possible managed lane changes for SR-91;
• Four lanes in Corridor A (without connections to SR-91);
• Four lanes in Corridor B (toll);
• Widening of SR-74 to four lanes; and
• Goods movement (BNSF track additions).
Committee Member Buster asked if the Project Team was developing comparisons of
the cost index with the traffic throughput for the individual alternatives? Mr. Rahimian
said they were developing comparisons.
Committee Member Duvall was concerned that some of the alignments are based upon
the BNSF railroad and approval has not been received from BNSF that their right-of-way
can be used. Mr. Rahimian said the Project Team is examining different alternatives to
accomplish the same goal without the use of BNSF's right-of-way.
Vice Chairman Miller was very concerned about the impacts of an elevated structure on
BNSF right-of-way through Corona.. He said this structure was not part of the original
intent of the study. Vice Chairman Miller wanted to know if there was still motivation to
continue studying this specific alignment or maybe the study effort should be focused on
an elevated structure over the existing SR-91. He was concerned that, from past
experience, BNSF might also be hard to work with. He asked the Committee if there is
any motivation to give some different direction. Chairman Campbell said this was a
screening alternative and there is budget to study this so the study should continue.
July 15, 2005
6 of 11 RC - OC MIS Policy Committee
MINUTES
Riverside County to Orange County
Major Investment Study
Policy Committee
July 15, 2005
werside County
ransportation Commission
Committee Member Magee said that if we are going to retain the BNSF alternative, even
though we do not have a response, he thinks it is premature to abandon the Corridor C
alternative. The Outreach Report contains several statements of support for the Corridor
C alternative. In Corridor C, there is a developer that wants to work with the City in
preserving right-of-way and avoiding homes in that area. Corridor B may be less
expensive and less environmentally intrusive, but we have not talked about the taking of
homes and moratoriums and the cost that would entail. If we are going to keep the
BNSF alternative, we should also keep Corridor C.
Committee Member Buster asked what would be the impacts of continuing to study
Corridor C.
Mr. Rahimian said that, because the detailed engineering and environmental work needs
to start after this meeting, the Project Team would like to concentrate their efforts on the
recommended Strategic Alternatives. Opening another corridor would add time pressure
on the team.
Committee Member Hall said the figures have indicated that the Cajalco route would
handle more traffic and the intent of this effort is to relieve pressure on the SR-91. As
you get farther south from the SR-91, you lose the benefit of the alternative corridor and
you have to further expand the SR-91 to accommodate the additional traffic. A great
effort has been made to identify corridors in western Riverside County that would open
up the valley area. We have identified the best route as being Cajalco/Ramona Parkway
to run east and west. The problem is that when you move south from Cajalco to
continue this route west, you are double loading the 1-15 freeway. Now you are looking
at improvements on the 1-15 in addition to the route through the mountains. It seems
this study is pointing out that the Cajalco route is the most effective route.
Committee Member Moore agreed with Committee Member Hall that Corridor B is the
best corridor because of the number of trips it takes off of SR-91. He is also in favor of
Corridor A because it ties directly into 1-15 from SR-241, which would also relieve traffic
on SR-91. One of the reasons that Corridor C was eliminated was because it is further
away from the SR-91, so to add Corridor C back in does not make sense to him.
Committee Member Ryan suggested looking at the big picture and seeing what works.
At this point, he doesn't feel like he has enough information to make a really informed
decision. He also has serious reservations regarding the elevated structure over the
railroad or even near the railroad. However, we aren't going to solve all the
transportation issues between the two counties simply with the SR-91 corridor; there
need to be other altematives. He would like to continue to study Corridor C.
Committee Member Pringle observed that a lot of the alternatives are mix and match
components. It is feasible to widen the SR-91 and to build Corridor A as well as Corridor
B and D. It is not conceivable to build both Corridor B and C. There has been a lot of
exploration of these two corridors. There is a dramatic drop-off of Riverside and San
Bernardino County commuters if you get too far south of the access point from Riverside
County He asked that the Project Team share some of their other presentations so that
everyone is aware of the work that has been done in terms of making the
recommendations.
July 15, 2005
7 of 11 RC - OC MIS Policy Committee
MINUTES
Riverside County to Orange Coun
Major Investment Study
Policy Committee
July 15, 2005
iversideCounty
Transportation Commission
Mr. Rahimian said as you move further south along the County Line, the travel demand
to Orange County from western Riverside County and San Bernardino County
diminishes significantly. It is not really feasible to construct Corridor B and Corridor C.
In addition, as you move further south, because your demand decreases, you attract
less traffic, which means that you have to put more traffic in the SR-91 corridor and this
creates other issues and problems. There would not be any gain or change in results
from studying Corridor C further. If Corridor C is decided over Corridor B there will be
more traffic placed either on the Ortega Highway, or on the SR-91.
Strategic Alternative III-B
This alternative is very similar to III -A except this alternative has possible managed lanes
for Corridor A instead of the possible managed lane changes for SR-91 in III -A.
Recommendations/Next Steps
• Approve the Strategic Alternatives;
• Direct staff to return in October 2005 with the detailed Evaluation of Strategic
Alternatives and recommendation for the Locally Preferred Strategy;
• Public Outreach efforts planned for Fall of 2005; and
• OCTA/RCTC consideration of Locally Preferred Strategy in December 2005.
Chairman Campbell wanted clarification that this Committee's approval will be narrowing
the altematives. Ms. Bechtel said this was correct. .
4. Public Comments
Anthony Mack
Mr. Mack is a resident in Silverado Canyon and owns property in Riverside. and Orange .
counties. He observed that, while Riverside residents might like the concept of a new corridor,
Orange County residents don't and the idea of a surface road through the Cleveland National
Forest is particularly offensive. He suggested that any route for Corridor B or Corridor C be
mostly tunnel to avoid dividing the forest habitat and felt that the reasons for eliminating Corridor
C were not well founded. Finally, he did not believe toll roads were a solution to congestion on
SR 91 because commuters are not willing to pay the toll.
Scott Breeden
Mr. Breeden said the real problem is that there are not enough jobs in Riverside County close to
the residents. The emphasis should be on creating jobs in Riverside County, not transportation
corridors to Orange County.
Clair Schlotterbeck
Ms. Schlotterbeck works with the Wildlife Conservation Authority and is on the Stakeholders
Committee. She would like to obtain the origin and destination figures used for the analysis so
that others could evaluate them. She feels that, if the destination numbers are not right, the
solutions being proposed will not relieve congestion. An alternative she supports is developing
a job base in Riverside County. As an advocate for Chino Hills State Park and the Chino Hills
Wildlife Corridor, she urged that Corridor A be dropped, this route would impact the only
national area of the Santa Ana River in Orange County.
July 15, 2005
8 of 11 RC - OC MIS Policy Committee
"
"
O C T A
M I N U T E S
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y t o O r a n g e C o u n t y
M a j o r I n v e s t m e n t S t u d y
P o l i c y C o m m i t t e e
J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 0 5
- R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
C o n n i e N e l s o n
M s . N e l s o n i s a r e s i d e n t o f S i l v e r a d o C a n y o n . S h e i s c o n c e m e d a b o u t t h e i m p a c t s o n t h e
r e s i d e n t s i f t u n n e l i n g i s d o n e i n S i l v e r a d o C a n y o n . S h e f e e l s t h e t o l l r o a d s a r e u n d e r u t i l i z e d a n d
t h i n k s r e v e r s i b l e l a n e s o n S R 9 1 a r e a m o r e e f f e c t i v e s o l u t i o n . F o r t r a v e l b e t w e e n s o u t h e r n
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y a n d s o u t h e r n O r a n g e C o u n t y , w i d e n i n g O r t e g a H i g h w a y i s t h e b e s t c h o i c e .
M s . N e l s o n o b s e r v e d t h a t , o n t h e s o u t h s i d e o f t h e S R - 9 1 , t h e r e a r e 8 5 0 a c r e s t h a t a r e p o s s i b l y
f o r s a l e a n d s h e k n o w s w h o m t o c o n t a c t . C h a i r m a n C a m p b e l l a s k e d M s . N e l s o n t o p r o v i d e M r .
R a h i m i a n w i t h t h a t i n f o r m a t i o n . V i c e C h a i r m a n M i l l e r s a i d C o r o n a w a s w o r k i n g v e r y c l o s e l y w i t h
t h a t d e v e l o p e r a n d t h e y w o u l d b e a b l e t o a s s i s t .
C a t h y D e Y o u n q
M s . D e Y o u n g i s a f o r m e r b o a r d m e m b e r o f O C T A a n d i s t h e M a y o r P r o - T e m f o r t h e C i t y o f
L a g u n a N i g u e l . S h e i s c o m m e n t i n g o n C o r r i d o r D a s a n i n d i v i d u a l a n d n o t r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e
C i t y , w h i c h h a s n o t t a k e n a p o s i t i o n . M s . D e Y o u n g i s c o n c e r n e d a b o u t t h e i n c r e a s e i n t r a f f i c o n
C o r r i d o r D i f i t i s d e v e l o p e d a n d t h e r e s u l t a n t i m p a c t o n 1 - 5 . T h e c o n n e c t i o n o f S R 2 4 1 w i t h
O r t e g a H i g h w a y w i l l n o t h e l p t h e s i t u a t i o n , a s t r a v e l e r s w i l l o p t f o r t h e f r e e r o u t e i n s t e a d o f t h e
t o l l e d r o u t e a n d w i l l c o n t i n u e d o w n O r t e g a H i g h w a y t o 1 - 5 . T h e 1 - 5 s o u t h h a s b e e n c r i t i c a l l y
i m p a c t e d i n t h e l a s t f e w y e a r s . T h e O C T A B o a r d w a s k i n d e n o u g h t o s u p p o r t a M a j o r
I n v e s t m e n t S t u d y f o r 1 - 5 s o u t h t h a t M s . D e Y o u n g p r o p o s e d w h e n s h e w a s o n t h e B o a r d .
S i m i l a r l y , f o r t h i s p r o j e c t , t h e i m p a c t o n t h e w h o l e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s y s t e m t h r o u g h o u t O r a n g e
C o u n t y s h o u l d b e c o n s i d e r e d . S p e c i f i c a l l y , i f C o r r i d o r D i s g o i n g t o b e c o n s t r u c t e d , w h a t
i m p r o v e m e n t s w i l l b e m a d e o n 1 - 5 ? M s D e Y o u n g a l s o n o t e d t h a t s h e h a d s e e n a l e t t e r f r o m t h e
C i t y o f S a n J u a n C a p i s t r a n o i n d i c a t i n g t h a t t h e y a r e s u p p o r t i v e o f t h e i m p r o v e m e n t t o 4 l a n e s ,
b u t t h e y w a n t i t b u i l t l a s t a n d t h e y w a n t e d s a f e g u a r d s t h a t w i l l m i n i m i z e t h e i m p a c t t o t h e i r c i t y .
S h e a s k e d t h a t t h e l e t t e r b e d i s t r i b u t e d t o t h i s B o a r d s o t h e C i t y ' s v i e w p o i n t i s m a d e v e r y c l e a r
o n t h i s i s s u e . M s . D e Y o u n g d o e s n o t t h i n k C o r r i d o r D i s t h e i d e a l o p t i o n . S h e b e l i e v e s
e v e r y o n e h e a d s t o n o r t h e r n O r a n g e C o u n t y f r o m t h i s M a j o r I n v e s t m e n t S t u d y s o w h y i n c r e a s e
t h e t r a f f i c t o s o u t h O r a n g e C o u n t y o n l y t o h a v e i t t h e n m o v e u p t o n o r t h O r a n g e C o u n t y .
E n r i q u e A r r o y o
E n r i q u e A r r o y o i s r e p r e s e n t i n g C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e P a r k s a n d i n p a r t i c u l a r , C h i n o H i l l s S t a t e P a r k .
M r . A r r o y o a p p r e c i a t e s t h e e f f o r t s o f t h e P r o j e c t T e a m t o t a k e s t e p s t o c r e a t e o b j e c t i v e
m a t e r i a l s , s u c h a s m a p s a n d i n f o r m a t i o n . M r . A r r o y o a l s o w a n t e d t o p o i n t o u t t h a t i n t h e D r a f t
S c r e e n i n g R e p o r t E x h i b i t s 3 . 1 4 a n d 3 . 1 5 d o n o t s h o w t h e b o u n d a r i e s o f t h e C h i n o H i l l s S t a t e
P a r k . I f t h e b o u n d a r i e s o f t h e S t a t e P a r k a r e n o t s h o w n r e l a t i v e t o t h e p r o p o s e d a l i g n m e n t
o p t i o n s f o r C o r r i d o r A t h i s m i g h t m i s l e a d t h e p u b l i c a b o u t t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t s t o t h e S t a t e
P a r k a n d m a y e f f e c t t h e u l t i m a t e d e c i s i o n .
5 . A d d i t i o n a l C o m m e n t s f r o m t h e C o m m i t t e e
C o m m i t t e e M e m b e r R i t s c h e l w a n t e d t o c o r r e c t , i n h e r o p i n i o n , a c o m m e n t m a d e b y o n e o f t h e
s p e a k e r s w i t h r e g a r d t o g r o w t h i n t h e c o u n t y . A l t h o u g h t h e r e h a s b e e n t r e m e n d o u s r e s i d e n t i a l
g r o w t h i n s o u t h O r a n g e C o u n t y , t h a t i s n o t w h e r e t h e j o b s a r e . T h e j o b s a r e p r i m a r i l y i n c e n t r a l
a n d n o r t h O r a n g e C o u n t y a n d t h a t i s w h e r e p e o p l e a r e c o m m u t i n g t o f r o m R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . I f
p e o p l e d r i v e f r o m R i v e r s i d e o n t h e i m p r o v e d O r t e g a H i g h w a y , t h e y w i l l t a k e 1 - 5 a s a n o t o l l
c h o i c e , o r t h e S R - 2 4 1 , i f t h e y a r e w i l l i n g t o p a y a t o l l , a n d h e a d n o r t h . I f t h e O r t e g a H i g h w a y i s
i n c l u d e d i n t h e s e a l t e r n a t i v e s , s h e w o u l d l i k e t o s e e , a s C a t h y D e Y o u n g h a s r e c o m m e n d e d , a n
a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e i m p a c t o f t h i s t r a f f i c t h r o u g h o u t O r a n g e C o u n t y . S e c o n d l y , s h e w o u l d l i k e t o
s e e t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s t o t h e S R - 7 4 c o n t i n g e n t u p o n t h e S R - 2 4 1 b e i n g c o m p l e t e d . I f S R - 2 4 1 i s
n o t e x t e n d e d , a l l t h e t r a f f i c c o m i n g o v e r f r o m R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y w i l l e n d u p o n s u r f a c e s t r e e t s
J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 0 5
9 o f 1 1 R C - O C M I S P o l i c y C o m m i t t e e
MINUTES
Riverside County to Orange County
Major Investment Study
Policy Committee
July 15, 2005
iversideCounty
ransportation Connnission
and substantially impact the communities, including San Juan Capistrano. San Juan Capistrano
did provide their detailed comments on improvements to the Ortega, and one of their primary
concerns was the timing of the improvements, the improvements to the Ortega should be the
last to be completed.
Committee Member Buster said the Ortega Highway is a two-lane road with head-on collisions.
He appreciates Committee Member Ritschel's concerns, but there has to be four lanes on the
Ortega Highway to cure the head on collisions. He believes she understands and supports the
Caltrans improvement project, but if the Ortega is expanded to four lanes it takes care of the
improvement project at the same time. He also observed that Riverside County needs to work
on the current imbalance of housing and jobs.
Committee Member Moore said what is feeding the growth in Riverside County right now is the
cost of homes in Orange County. He said we are in this together and we have to solve this
together. .
Committee Member Magee asked that the impacts of increasing capacity on SR 74 be
addressedon the Lake Elsinore side as well as the Orange County side. From the 1-15 until you
reach the mountains, Highway 74 is going through a developed, populated area of Lake
Elsinore.
Committee Member Pringle said he will vote no on Strategic Alternative I because it does not
include a significant option outside of the Santa Ana Canyon. Any viable alternative has to
include some mid -county connection, and Corridors B and C provide that. He recommends
eliminating C and including B. He has a concern about Corridor A and the future study of
Corridor A because it contributes to the burden in the Santa Ana Canyon.
Committee Member Ryan provided some information from the TCA Boards' points of view.
Yesterday both Boards directed their legal staff to draft an agreement between the two Boards,
so they can move forward quickly with Foothill South. From the TCA's perspective the toll
systems impacts need to be examined carefully.
Vice Chairman Miller had concerns on Altemative I; he said concentrating all that traffic in that
Corridor is problematic from a safety standpoint. When Prado Dam had a leak, there were
serious immobility issues. SR-71 was closed by the leak, and if the Ortega Highway had been
closed, the only connection between the two counties would have been SR-91. Concentrating
so much traffic in one corridor was not reasonable.
6. Voting on the Strategic Alternatives
Chairman Campbell proposed that the Board vote on each of the Strategic Alternatives, then
when they complete voting on 1 through III, come back and revisit whether or not to give staff
direction to add Corridor C back in. Chairman Campbell wanted to know how many votes were
needed? Steve Debaun, Legal Counsel, said a majoritywas necessary and that would be 6 of
the 11 members present .
Chairman Campbell than conducted the vote:
Allin favor of Strategic Alternative I — By a show of hands it was opposed.
All in favor of Strategic Alternative II — By a show of hands it was passed.
All in favor of Strategic Alternative IIIA & IIIB — By a show of hands it was passed.
All in favor of reconsidering Corridor C — By a show of hands it was opposed.
July 15, 2005
10 of 11 RC - OC MIS Policy Committee
"
M I N U T E S
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y t o O r a n g e C o u n t y
M a j o r I n v e s t m e n t S t u d y
P o l i c y C o m m i t t e e
J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 0 5
s i d e C o u n t y
r a n s p o r t a t o n C o m m i s s i o n :
C h a i r m a n C a m p b e l l a s k e d i f M r . R a h i m i a n h a d a n y o b s e r v a t i o n s t h a t m i g h t i n f l u e n c e t h e
C o m m i t t e e t o r e - c o n s i d e r A l t e r n a t i v e I . M r . R a h i m i a n o b s e r v e d t h a t t h e C o m m i t t e e w i l l b e
c o n s i d e r i n g t h e S t r a t e g i c A l t e r n a t i v e s a p p r o v e d t o d a y i n O c t o b e r w h e n t h e t e a m w i l l b e b r i n g i n g
f o r w a r d t h e r e s u l t s o f a d e t a i l e d a n a l y s i s . I f t h e B o a r d w i l l a l l o w t h e t e c h n i c a l t e a m t o s t u d y i n
f u r t h e r d e t a i l A l t e r n a t i v e I , i t w i l l p r o v i d e a b e t t e r p e r s p e c t i v e o f t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t s a n d
t h e c o s t s o f e a c h S t r a t e g i c A l t e r n a t i v e .
C h a i r m a n C a m p b e l l w a n t e d t o k n o w i f M r . R a h i m i a n w a s s u g g e s t i n g t h a t , i n e l i m i n a t i n g t h e o n e
A l t e r n a t i v e t h a t d i d n o t i n c l u d e a r o u t e w i t h a n e w a l i g n m e n t t h e y m i g h t n o t b e l i v i n g u p t o a l l o f
t h e p a r a m e t e r s o f a F e d e r a l r e q u i r e m e n t ? M r . R a h i m i a n r e s p o n d e d t h a t h e b e l i e v e d e l i m i n a t i n g
t h a t S t r a t e g i c A l t e r n a t i v e a t t h i s t i m e w a s p r e m a t u r e .
M r . L e a h y , s a i d t h a t A l t e m a t i v e I s h o u l d b e r e c o n s i d e r e d b e c a u s e o f t h e i s s u e w i t h B N S F .
M s . B e c h t e l s a i d t h a t f u r t h e r s t u d y o f A l t e m a t i v e I w o u l d h e l p t h e s t a f f . T h e M a j o r I n v e s t m e n t
S t u d y i s a f i r s t s t e p w h e n m o v i n g i n t o t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o c e s s a n d c o m p l e t i n g i t w i t h a f u l l
r a n g e o f a l t e r n a t i v e s i s i m p o r t a n t t o d e m o n s t r a t i n g a t h o r o u g h r e v i e w t o t h e r e s o u r c e a g e n c i e s
w h e n w e m o v e t o t h e n e x t s t e p i n t h e p r o c e s s . W h e n t h e s t a f f b r i n g s f o r w a r d t h e d e t a i l e d
r e p o r t a n d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n i n O c t o b e r , t h e C o m m i t t e e w i l l h a v e t h e o p p o r t u n i t y t o e l i m i n a t e t h i s
S t r a t e g i c A l t e r n a t i v e .
C h a i r m a n C a m p b e l l c a l l e d f o r a v o t e t o r e c o n s i d e r S t r a t e g i c A l t e r n a t i v e I .
C o m m i t t e e M e m b e r R i t s c h e l s a i d s h e w a n t e d t o m a k e o n e f i n a l c o m m e n t . S h e s a i d s h e d i d
o p p o s e A l t e r n a t i v e I i n i t i a l l y a l o n g w i t h t h e m a j o r i t y o f t h e C o m m i t t e e M e m b e r s . H e r o n l y
c o n c e m a s w e m o v e f o r w a r d i s t h a t t h e o n l y a l t e r n a t i v e s t h a t w e w i l l b e c o n s i d e r i n g i n c l u d e a
t u n n e l . O f c o u r s e s h e i s i n f a v o r o f c o n t i n u i n g t o p u r s u e t h e t u n n e l , b u t i n t h e e n d w h a t i f t h e
t u n n e l d o e s n o t w o r k ? T h e r e a r e a l o t o f r i s k s t o a t u n n e l o p t i o n a n d i f a t u n n e l d o e s n ' t e n d u p
b e i n g f e a s i b l e , a r e w e g o i n g t o b e a b l e t o a c h i e v e o u r a d d i t i o n a l c a p a c i t y t h a t i s o n e o f o u r
o b j e c t i v e s ? S h e s t a t e d s h e w a s w i l l i n g t o r e c o n s i d e r a n d i n c l u d e S t r a t e g i c A l t e r n a t i v e I a s w e
g o f o r w a r d .
C o m m i t t e e M e m b e r B r o w n o b s e r v e d t h a t n o t h i n g w o u l d b e l o s t b y c o n t i n u i n g t o s t u d y S t r a t e g i c
A l t e r n a t i v e I . I n t h r e e m o n t h s , i f t h e C o m m i t t e e s t i l l w a n t e d t o e l i m i n a t e i t , a t l e a s t t h e d e c i s i o n
w o u l d b e b a s e d o n m o r e d e t a i l e d s t u d y .
C h a i r m a n C a m p b e l l t h e n a s k e d f o r a v o t e o n r e t a i n i n g S t r a t e g i c A l t e r n a t i v e I B y a s h o w o f
h a n d s i t w a s i n c l u d e d .
C o m m i t t e e M e m b e r R i t s c h e l s a i d i t w o u l d b e v e r y h e l p f u l i f t h e C o m m i t t e e c o u l d r e c e i v e t h e
m a t e r i a l s f o r t h e m e e t i n g a c o u p l e o f d a y s i n a d v a n c e a n d a s k e d t h a t , p r i o r t o t h e n e x t m e e t i n g ,
t h a t t h i s w o u l d b e d o n e .
C h a i r m a n C a m p b e l l a d j o u r n e d t h e m e e t i n g a n d t h a n k e d t h e s t a f f f o r t h e i r p r e s e n t a t i o n a n d t h e
C o m m i t t e e f o r t h e i r p a r t i c i p a t i o n .
7 . N e x t M e e t i n g O c t o b e r 2 1 , 2 0 0 5 a t 9 : 0 0 A . M . a t R C T C
8 . A d j o u r n m e n t
M e e t i n g a d j o u r n e d a t 1 2 : 1 0 p . m .
J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 0 5
1 1 o f 1 1 R C - O C M I S P o l i c y C o m m i t t e e
"
2 .
"
Item 2.
OCTA
October 28, 2005
To:
From:
Subject:
Overview
Riverside County — Orange County Major
Policy Committee
Paul C. Taylor, P.E. Exec
and Commuter Services
Strategic Alternatives Technical Evaluation
Investment Study
ng, Development
Technical evaluation is under way for the three alternatives recommended by
the Riverside County — Orange County Major Investment Study Policy
Committee in July 2005. An overview of the alternatives, cost estimates,
impacts and benefits, and preliminary technical findings is attached for review
and comment.
Recommendations
A.
Receive and file as an information item.
B. Provide direction to staff on issues for further technical evaluation in
developing the Locally Preferred Strategy.
C. Direct staff to return on November 18, 2005, with recommendations for a
Locally Preferred Strategy.
Attachment
A. Briefing Packet
Orange County Transportation Authority
550 South Main Street / P.O. Box 14184 / Orange / California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282)
ATTACHMENT A
00z le aa90100
uorssrlaluoD nor. vmodsun r
,t urro
uorssrdr
st uno
aapiuzuzoj kloglApv .zapiogaxeis -
Ieotupal,) uzea,r, wowdopAga loo[aid -
aa11imwoD Xoijod -
saautuzuzoj looraid
OZ nqui°3°CI uT popidwoj oq o,I,
-frOOZ aunt ui urfog loorom
punclAmautt jaa Rad
Aiunoio efiu noo ngi
0
noIs
,Out
IMsixa .nano XITOUdE0 o�OS
ql.m0-12 OgiZ JoJ
son.gmuow Tupow-pinui opnpu
4rus pow sJopwoo mou iSpluap
6-2IS auk slumuomuditij ozpupce
samparcto Spnis Sfax
Jo unoo emb
•
:.“!/ 1 .iCISi �.iSI .
OEOZ AVC101.
011
000`000` I 000`000`
k9
Y - i
000`000`Z 000`000`Z
a,
000`000` E 000`000` €
000`000`17 000`000`17
NOIJ_VindOd
•
000'0 3
000'00Z
000' 00 £
000' 0017
000'00
000 00Z
000000E
000'0017
.AMd I 6 AWa/S31DIH3A
•
virn3W31
13143N
OlNio'P NVS
A1Nr103 ONKNIINS3B NIPS 1513
31f1
NOANY3 .'
$upspx3
quaol J oue m Gooz
31 N3Nm0
NYS '•
,��
NOISSIN
CHOWN 13<1DIN
*marl
s„., iNlAsi
A311VA
ON3NOW
;'HNC J5
.
11, 03110N
S111H ONIN3
V'32ib8[1S BLS &MIL' Y,14.1. t10.I.i�i'd�?I3d
SONIWOW.° atirl Aitgnco
unoems."
113Y38
INOcUA3N
8p�
WNW Viten
�i-
vaNn VBRIOA
tl3116
-b 7�
f Nausmr»
S3139NV SO1
•
•
�� p 0 0 0 x o p o l o o d x o P K O Z
I C I V 0 0 0 ` O Z Z
u o P o u 2 I s o P I U V 0 0 0 ' 8 9 Z ' u T C u r o X l l u o n n j
s p u a l a a r n
& u n T o u - I k e p a u k J o I s o m s u o m p u o o p u g d o f f s
s a p u n o a a p i s n n T N p u g a 2 u r i p
u a a r n p q J o p i . u o o . 1 0 f E W ' q u o a u k ��e n n a a . g j 6
a & r e J p u t
s k u m a a . g p a l s o 2 u o o l u o m a u k J o a u o p o n m s u o D
s p u e u t a p a m n j p u g
l u a u n o a t p u e u a l u n b a p u u t ��u n n a a . 0 1 6
s a n s s i u o g e p o d s u e k t
u n o o
a
CINVIA3C1 318n n 33W Ol CI C133N
I LAIS
01 El VI SI
16-1IS S3NIV1 DNIISIX3
•
} t snivao Fpnwwoo
pug Fpuomsoi 2uIss000r spew aReluo.zd
kem-jo-N2p suawej
apiispuri uumu.zapum
.5atsso.zo a;rjplim aoAtej Fop —
�[-��d MelS SifiH oulu3
um-;o-N2iz pooh}) Janig eud muus
wowdopAop tepuopIsai pouumd pur 2upsyca
sluatuammdmi
T6-2IS .10j SlUMIJS1103
efiuwo unoo
•
uuouoj pug `wouTso
`ouansidup uunr ups `autnij qupticuv -
SOOZ tl��
aiouism pug quIoquuv `oumisidup uunr
ups tuatop `autuI twanIAT muus ouourN -
SOOZ auPdS
muouo3 pug
a.iouisig avri `ofatn uoTssm `autnJI tuptiruv -
t7OOZ ITEd
spojja timaIlno alpind
Alpunoo uato n}u�
•
�A!d
•
noigSfltllil0'p ilDni9J iodsumil
, rinorjamsdi llll
gooz iqnr povms
env tioariaQo ianid3oNoo
SNYY Al Ines 3 +1 0JuNnoo 30.ISa3AIN
�4/1,02
(traits oi sa ,# �t,s omPsAGO imp
t$11:1S 04 alowsi3 - a loPmxk3 rr
�S 9i St iruotoa wwe+i a
ud+taeo euq et+w06 - y00
PUN Z [
aamunuoD
ioTiod �q
paAaiddu «spurq„
Joptlloo pealg
uaINT sPms
p -Munoz anit/
0
•
"
"
"
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y - O r a n g e C o u n .
P o l i c y C o m m i t t e e D i r e c t i o n
J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 0 5
" P e r f o r m D e t a i l e d E v a l u a t i o n
M a x i m u m r e a s o n a b l e w i d e n i n g o f S R - 9 1
M a x i m i z e t r a n s i t i n a l l C o r r i d o r s
C o r r i d o r A
C o r r i d o r B
C o r r i d o r D
" E l i m i n a t e d f r o m F u r t h e r C o n s i
S u r f a c e a l i g n m e n t s i n C o r r i d o r
C o r r i d o r C
"
* M a g l e v
* O n e l a n e e a c h d i r e c t i o n o f S R - 9 1 f r o m C o u n t y L i n e t o 1 - 1 5
* O n e e a s t b o u n d a u x i l i a r y l a n e o n S R - 9 1 f r o m S R - 2 4 1 t o S R - 7 1
* E x t e n s i o n o f S R - 2 4 1 ( F o o t h i l l S o u t h ) t o 1 - 5
l o r
I r t Y l o S a g a
P o R I L L U S t R A D V k
P u R P O S E S O N L Y
A
r . , A ; I t n
"
O r a n g e C o t , :
A - A
B - B
L E G E N D
F x i s t i n g S i g t e v a y C - C
P r o p o s e d S R - 9 1 I n w r o w i r e n t s
P r o p o s e d M V E V A t V f n e ' t
E x i s t i n g S R - 9 1 L a n e s
N M P r o p o s e d A d d s d o n a i S R - 9 1 9 a s e i r i s L w e s :
. r o p o s e d V i a p i e v T r a n s i t b o r n e n t s
" P r o p o s e d E x t e n s i o n d S R - 2 4 1
0 P t d o c s e d E l V i e V 6 1 3 1 l i t e r c h a r i p s
P R O P O S E D C O R R I D O R ' A ' E L E V A T E D S T R U C T U R E W I T H M A G L E V
N o t e . 1 1 4 0 1 e n e d t
A A
W B E B
p t e n t 6 i i l y E n : i a c a t e d t i s t f , e , a , e p o s t : 0 C o f f i d o f 2 / 1 ' 6 - * * e i t a v a t o d s t r u c l u r e
P R O P O S E D S R - 9 1 C O R R I D O R " N O A D D I T I O N A L L A N E S F R O M S R - 5 5 T O S R - 2 4 1
Y V B
E B
P R O P O S E D S R - 9 1 C O R R I D O R - A D D I T I O N A L 3 L A N E S F R O M
A , , ,
S h 4 t a r e
i k g r . , C / I N a n o , o i E f r A t o T o t T S o f t s
W R
R " 7 1
5 W e d F l o w a l o e s
E B
P R O P O S E D S R - 9 I C O R R I D O R A D D I T I O N A L 2 L A N E S F R O M S R - T 1 T 0 1 - 1 5
5 ! A x e d r t n t L t r y t .
- i 0 V B a r e ,
H O V B u f f *
a f t 5 k t i N d F l A t L a r v a e
E S
A i r r
L a n e
H I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y - O R A N G E C O U N T Y M I S
2 0 3 0 N O B U I L D S T R A T E G I C A L T E R N A T I V E
I0OCITE0 Jo Hol 'smog Arad &limp rno
jo uopoa.rtp auk auT2ump) lcloouoo aum pogrucw
wals�s lIsuaij aziLutx-elAT .
uopoafrmp
up" ui T6-11S auk salmi orni. auo ppv •
samjetuallv
uT jualsIsuo3 quatuaAomitui
ustp unoo apisJei.la
•
uTuJi 'nods a� , S °Tau
sauel aigtszanag/,I,OH/AOH
2cloouo3 souuri pogeurw
�C�IIi��d auPtIed EPS 000`
sduzeN doJa Aoll -
uuo.zop ui Joluoj lIsuau popurdxg
oopuas luijailaw posuanui
ooImos sng ssaldxg
samijuag �isueaZ
&two unoo apisie
•
"
R i v e r s i d e C o u
' M a x i m i z e t r a n s i t s y s t e m
' M a x i m u m w i d e n i n g t o S R - 9 1
' P o s s i b l e m a n a g e d l a n e c h a n g e s f o r S R - 9 1
" S i x l a n e s e l e v a t e d s t r u c t u r e i n C o r r i d o r A
' W i d e n i n g o f S R - 7 4 t o f o u r l a n e s
' R e i m b u r s e T C A f o r l o s s o f t o l l r e v e n u e s o n S R - 2 4 1 ( o p t i o n )
B - B P o s s i b l e
F o u r t h
T r a c k '
B N S F R a i l L i n e s
S t r u c t u r e c o u l d b e l o c a l e : 1 e i t h e r K M , s o u t h , a g e l w i n a n d m i u t i d t h e E t t i S F n i n t - o f - t r o p t
I d O t I t r i r f O r ' e r r i e n % A O U I a b e C O n s i n i C t e d o u t s i d e o r B m s r r i g h t - o f , w w
n e s k r c o - s t r u m : i s o f f o u r t h V a l b r h e i g h t e x p a n s i o n
P R O P O S E D S R - 9 1 C O R R I D O R - A D D I T I O N A L 3 L A N E S F R O M S R - 5 5 T O S R - 2 4 1
P R O P O S E D C O R R I D O R ' A 6 - L A N E E L E V A T E D S T R U C T U R E
F e N
Y e a s y 1 E ,
3 , 3 F . 1 , 1 1 U V ! O S
E B
3 G R T o l L a w S h N
A - A
f i x
N a t i n S c a l e
F O R I L L U S T R A T I V E
P U R P O S E S O N L Y
L E G E N D
E x i s t i n g 1 4 4 - m a y
P r o p o s e d S R - 9 1 I m p r o v e m e n t s
P r o p o s e d A d d i t i o n a l S R - 9 1 L a n e s
E x i s t i r v g S R - 9 1 L a n e s
- P r o p x e d C o r r i d o r A A l i g n m e n t
- P r o p o s e d C o r r i d o r A I m p r o v e m e n t s
P r o p o s e d E x t e n s i o n o f S R - 2 4 1
P r o p o s e d C o n i d c t D I m p r o v e m e n t s
P r o p o s e d C a r i d o r D R o u t e
P r o p o e r , : d C o r r i d o r D L a n e s
P r o r c e e d M a g l e v A l i g n m e n t B y O t h e r s '
+ 2 P r o p o s e d N u m b e r o f A v d d i t i o n a l L a n e s
B - B
C - C
B u f f e r \
W B
M a n a g W
L a n e s
M f g
2 M a n a g e d
L a n e s
E B
E B
c o n a l l u � t h e r e
6 M i x e d F I V A L a n e s A u x S h I C I
P R O P O S E D S R - 9 1 C O R R I D O R - A D D I T I O N A L 2 L A N E S B E T W E E N S R . 7 1 A N D 1 . 1 5
9 1 1 6 ' 4 - M a n a g e d 2 M a n a g e d
5 M O M R o w U M L a n e s 6 h i k e d R a w U n a
W B
E S
P R O P O S E D C O R R I D O R ' D ' C O N V E N T I O N A L 4 - L A N E A R T E R I A L - T U N N E U S U R F A C E
- , - -
- - , . . . . . _ . . . - - - . _ _ _ _
M a l l I a n
e . '
2 4 �
5 '
v a r x r s
5 '
2 4 '
0 ,
e : _ ,
, 4
_ a t
W B
E B
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y - O R A N G E C O U N T Y M I S
S T R A T E G I C A L T E R N A T I V E I
"
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y - O r a n g e C o u n
L E G E N D
E x i s t i n g L a n e s
P r o p o s e d L a n e s
S i x - L a n e C o r r i d o r A W i t h i n S R - 9 1
W I T H E L E V A T E D S T R U C T U R E
H Q V / H Q T
u
w e
3 G P r i b l i L a n e s
H O W N O T
E B
S r l c 3 G R B T o P L a n e s
J P i I I I
, I v i 1 . a G l i 3 N W . '
L Q t I V O ,
_ _ _ _ _
, 1 M g , i M g
- _ . ��_
, I T f 1 A G i J i I V t n 1 3 1 1 3 C . 7
O f f f t f
f i t i l a
e a
a f i l l
N o t e , S t r u c t u r e c o u l d b e l o c a t e d e i t h e r o v e r t h e w e s t b o u n d l a n e s , e a r t h
s o u t h o f t h e B N S F r i g h t - o f - w a y o n t w o u n i - d i r e c t i o n a l s t r u c t u r e s .
d l a n e s , o r s p l i t n o r t h a n d
E B
V 1 i I T H O U T E L E V A T E D S T R U C T U R E
2 H t ) V f H O T 2 H O ' v / H � T
S h f d 5 M i x e d F l o w L a n e s L a n e s L a n e s
: ; T i r I f i "
5 M i x e d F l o
i x - l a n e s t r u c t u r e r e s u i s i n
� � 1 .
= 1 8 1 a n e s
= 1 4 1 a n e s
s
Riverside County -Orange Coun
Differences Between
Strategic Alternative IA and IB
• Strategic Alternative IA
— Reduces/eliminates tolls on SR-241 to relieve
SR-55
• Strategic Alternative IB
— Retains tolls on SR-241 and widens SR-55 by
one lane in each direction from SR-91 to
"
"
"
O r a n g e C o u n
S t r a t e g i c A l t . I B
R i g h t - o f - W a y I m p a c t s
i d e
L A N D U S E
A g r i c u l t u r a l
I n d u s t r i a l
R e s i d e n t i a l
S i n g l e - F a m i l y
M u l t i - F a m i l y
O f f i c e & C o m m e r i c a l
C h u r c h
O p e n S p a c e / C o n s e r v a t i o n
P r o p o s e d D e v e l o p m e n t
P u b l i c F a c i l i t i e s / U t i l i t i e s
T o t a l s
r c t c
j ' i r r n , i d r r , : o r I r t y
r a r q . ; , , i ; I c t i n ! 7 r f i 7 1 7 1 7 f r r i
A C R E S
0
0
0
4 3
1
2
1
0
0
0
4 7
R A N G E O F
P R O P E R T I E S
I M P A C T E D
0
0
0
2 0 0 t o 2 5 0
2 5 t o 5 0
2 t o 5
0
0
0
N / A
spS_ocninei d1S,1111 _;'J :tr-4,12.1N`f-t;�:`I� 1f•� '���=�
N 'ah i �S3g3i 7 4++C+idts3 .Fl fs�pf i.. ,14,1111.1- +.LM 1Frar -*
aPteri • nrrVa aanaad H01,01 .4 .=_: , 1+a r _
3.1774111i0 141141i i NAMIL-I R4
iM,7P•°L%�"iF rt tiOnflats,, 3 11...i363.13t! "w
1°PlIal°3
w Ajui daueap unoo apt Ani
•
•
•
"
"
"
R i v e r s i d e C o u O r a n g e
* M a x i m i z e t r a n s i t s y s t e m
* M a x i m u m w i d e n i n g t o S R - 9 1
* P o s s i b l e m a n a g e d l a n e c h a n g e s f o r S R - 9 1
* S i x l a n e f r e e w a y i n C o r r i d o r B ( t o l l f r e e w i t h t w o r e v e r s i b l e l a n e s )
E
A N A G L I I L A i i E
H a i f a S c a l e
F O R I L L U S T R A T N E
P U R P O S E S O N L Y
L E G E N D
E x i s t i n g H i g h . v a y
P r o p o s e d S R - 9 1 I m p r o v e m e n t s
i . e r x P r o p o s e d M d i l i o n a l S R - 9 1 L a n e s
U s i n g S R 9 1 L a n e s
- P r o p o s e d U t e n s i , : n o f S R - 2 4 1
P r o p o s e d C o r r i d o r B R o u t e
P r o p o s e d C u r i d o r B L a n e s
P r o p o s e d M a j e v N i g r r n e n t ( B y O i h s f s )
+ 2 P r o p o s e d N u m b e r o f k l d i t i o n a l L a m e
R D
_ L A K E S T
- 4 1 C f r I S R D
S h h i
A - A
W B E I S
N o t e h i e g i e v t o b e
c o n s t r u t I a d b v o t h e r s .
C - C
P R O P O S E D S R - , 9 1 C O R R I D O R - A D D I T I O N A L 3 L A N E S F R O M S R - 5 5 T O S R - 2 4 1
B U R (
6 W e d F l o . L . 4 E 4 . 6 .
I 2 M a i l a g a i
I L a m e .
B U I T . F . 4
1 , 4 a n a j E d
L a m s
1 3 3
0 M e d F l a w 1 . 6 1 1 0 6
P R O P O S E D S R - 9 1 C O R R I D O R - A D D I T I O N A L 2 L A N E S F R O M S R - 7 1 T O 1 - 1 5
B u m f B u f f
2 M a n a g a d 2 k i a n 4 j L 4 1
L E N S J 5 W a d F l a . L A r r , o 5
5 M a d F l m L a n e s
W B
E l 3
P R O P O S E D C O R R I D O R " B ' C O N V E N T I ( } N A L F s L A N E F R E E W A Y - T U N N E L / S U R F A C E
S h 4 d
5 % .
2 4 4 i c e , F l c k
R e v e r s b t 4 L . / v . 4 4
2 4 '
E B / W B
s h b .
5 , 1 C ,
' - i 2 R h - . , d F l a w 1 . 1 1 1 , 1 - 1
2 4 '
E B
A u x . S k i d
1 0 '
S h l d
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y - O R A N G E C O U N T Y M I S
S T R A T E G I C A L T E R N A T I V E I I
"
"
R E P R E S E N T A T I V E A A G N N I E N T ; S
"
"
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y - O r a n g e C o u
C o r r i d o r B
C O R R I D O R
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
. - L A M 1 1 1 1 . 0 1 1 V I t E T U N M E _ ! e # f 1 " R A 7 l V E J 1 L J R
. - L J 4 E / 4 1 1 D 4 - I . 1 0 0 . M A N L Y F U L i M I O D ! ' M 7 L A f l i 1 . 1 1 M I I M P O N i 1 V E A L C W I M E N T
4 - L I M E E 0 1 / 1 1 I I L E / 7 L I I M I L 1 7 L V L t / 1 L I f F
. - L E E S t a i r U C I S / 1 1 U N N I l L P L i N 0 0 4 0 I 1 - - 7 L / 1 1 A . 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 4
. - L E A 1 p 4 - L A N K 1 0 1 A , i Y i a i L - 1 1 . 1 0 L 1 1 0 N 7 1 I I N N O L I 0 0 1 - s i a C T I O M
4 - L A N K M I I L r m a p l u m e s . A I A I N S I E i 1 T - 1 t I I M E L 0 1 2 1 1 0 0
R E P R E S E N T A T I V E A L I G N M E N T S F O R I L L U S T R A T I V E P U R P O S E S O N L Y
"
"
i d e C o u n t y - O r a n
" M a x i m i z e t r a n s i t s y s t e m
" M a x i m u m w i d e n i n g t o S R - 9 1
" P o s s i b l e m a n a g e d l a n e c h a n g e s f o r S R - 9 1 o r C o r r i d o r A
" F o u r l a n e s i n C o r r i d o r A
" F o u r l a n e s i n C o r r i d o r B ( t o l l )
" W i d e n i n g o f S R - 7 4 t o f o u r l a n e s
A - A
M a r t o S c a l e
F O R I L L U S T R A T I V E
P U R P O S E S O N L Y
L E G E N D
E x h a l i n g H i g h w a y
P r o p o s e d S R - 9 r 1 I m p r o v e m e n t s
P r O r x 0 e A A d d i t i o n a l S R - f i t L a n e s
E x i s t i r g S R - 9 1 L a n e s
P r o p o s e d E x t e n s i o n o f S R 2 4
- P r o p o s e d C o r r i d o r A A l i g n m e n t
E l l P r o p o s e d C o r r i d o r A k n p r o v e r n e n t s
: 1 1 = P r o p o s e d C o r r i d o r B R o u t e
P r o p o s e d C o r r i d o r B L a r e s
- P r o p o s e d C o r r i d o r D I m p r o v e m e n t s
P r o p o s e d C o r r i d o r D R o u t e
P r o p o s e d C o r r i d o r D L a n e s
P r o p o s e d M a g l e v N i g n r n e n t ( B y 0 1 N r e
+ 2 P r o p o s e d N u m b e r o f A d d i t i o n a l L a n a s
B - B
E B W B
E L E V A T E D S T R U C T U R E
! N B
2 1 f t e d F l e w L i m , M i n 2 1 4 1 5 t h F i t h L i m a M t h
P o s s i b l e
F o u r t h
, s T r a c k
- B '
I S 1 A r i a !
I
. . . 4 6 . . . . . . , 1 6 _ , a 1 6 . _ . . . . . . . L L , _
/ I S N S F R a i l L i n e s \
N o t e : S t r u c t u e c o u l d b e l o c a t e d O t t e r n a b , s o u t h . a s L i i i n o r t h a n d s o u t h o f t h e @ N S F f i s p i - o / - w e s
o i . , r i t s o r i m p r m e m e n t s a m i d o n s I r u c t s o o u t s i d e o f @ N S F r t g h t - c l e a '
` I k e a f a c x x i s i t u c t i n o f f o u r t h b e d ( l O r f r e i g h t e x p a n s i o n .
P R O P O S E D S R - 9 I C O R R I D O R - A D D I T I O N A L 3 L A N E S F R O M S R - 5 5 T O S R - 2 4 1
P u f f e r B u f f e r
2 M a n a g e l
I M a n
L S D % 2 a g e d I
L a n e s M i x e d F i e f e L a n e s
F i t
I 1
-
M i x e d F l y e L a n e s
,
E S
P R O P O S E D S R - 9 1 C O R R I D O R = A D D I T I O N A L 2 L A N E S F R O M S R - 7 1 T O 1 - 1 5
e u n i K
L a r r e s e r r i i e s 4
a n a l T a 1 1 / 2 1 6 9 r
P R O P O S E D C O R R I D O R V C O N V E N T I O N A L 4 L A N E F R E E W A Y - T U N N E U S U R E ' A C E
C - C
D - D
S h i d
2 T e l L a n e s
1 0 '
S h i d
P R O P O S E D C O R R I D O R ' D ' C O N V E N T I O N A L 4 -
i
E B
E A R T E R I A L - T U N N E U S U R F A C E
k t h , - i t h n . . . . . _ _
V a r i e s
C H I
.
t r
:
W B
A u x S t i i i
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y - O R A N G E C O U N T Y M I S
S T R A T E G I C A L T E R N A T I V E I I I
"
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y - O r a n g e C o u n
F o u r - L a n e C o r r i d o r A W i t h i n S R - 9
W I T H E L E V A T E D S T R U C T U R E
L E G E N D
E x i s t i n g L a n e s
P r o p o s e d L a n e s
5 M i x e d F l o w L a n e s
W B E B
S h i d 2 1 I O T L a n e s S I 1 1 (
h l e 2 I O T L a n e s l a 1 d
W I T H O U T E L E V A T E D S T R U C T U R E
5 M i x e d F l o w L a n e s
. 2 H O W H O T 2 H O N / M O T
S h l d 5 M i x e d F l a w L a n e s L a , e s L a n e s 5 M i x e d F l o w L a n e s E n i d
o u r a n e s t r u c t u r e r e s u i s i n
l y t w o a d d i t i o n a l l a n e s .
j ' e r r " - f r ' r r ] w i F ` f �'"
I r r ; r f a t i t H . 7
= 1 6 1 a n e s
= 1 4 l a n e s
"
( ) r a n g C o t
E n v i r o n m e n t a l M i t i g a t i o n C o s t s
"
S u m m a r y o f P o t e n t i a l M i t i g a t i o n C o s t s b y C o r r i d o r ( M i l l i o n s )
D i s c i p l i n e
S R - 9 1
C o r r i d o r A
C o r r i d o r B
C o r r i d o r D
S i x - L a n e
C o m b o
S i x - L a n e
T u n n e l
F o u r - L a n e
C o m b o
F o u r - L a n e
T u n n e l
F o u r - L a n e
C o m b o _
F o u r - L a n e
S u r f a c e
B i o l o g i c a l R e s o u r c e s
$ 5 0
$ 3 0
$ 2 2 5
$ 7 5
$ 1 5 0
$ 7 5
$ 1 3 0
r
$ 2 6 5
N P D E S P e r u
$ 1 0
$ 1 0
$ 3 0
$ 1 5
$ 3 0
$ 1 5
$ 1 5
$ 3 0
C u l t u r a l R e s o u r c e s
$ 5
$ 1 0
$ 5 0
$ 2 5
$ 5 0
$ 2 5
$ 2 5
$ 5 0
N o i s e A t t e n u a t i o n
$ 2 0
$ 2 0
$ 1 0
$ 1 0
$ 1 0
$ 1 0
$ 1 0
$ 1 0
S e c t . 4 ( f ) R e s o u r c e s
$ 4 0
$ 5 0
$ 1 5 0
$ 5 0
$ 1 5 0
$ 5 0
$ 7 5
$ 1 5 0
V i s u a l R e s o u r c e s
$ 1 0
$ 1 0
$ 5 0
$ 5 0
$ 5 0
$ 5 0
$ 2 5
$ 5 0
C o n t i n g e n c y ( 2 5 % )
$ 3 0
$ 3 5
$ 1 3 0
$ 6 0
$ 1 1 0
$ 6 0
$ 7 0
$ 1 4 0 a
T o t a l
$ 1 6 5
$ 1 6 5
$ 6 4 5
$ 2 8 5
$ 5 5 0
$ 2 8 5
$ 3 5 0
$ 6 9 5
t 3 i o i o g i c a l K e s o u r c e M i t i g a t i o n i n c l u d e s p e r m i t s , c o n s t r u c t i o n m o n i t o r i n g , a n d l o n g - t e r m m o n i t o r i n g
C u l t u r a l R e s o u r c e s i n c l u d e s c o n s t r u c t i o n m o n i t o r i n g
N o i s e A t t e n u a t i o n o r S o u n d W a l l s
S e c t i o n 4 ( f ) i n c l u d e s r e l o c a t i o n / r e p l a c e m e n t r
V i s u a l R e s o u r c e s i n c l u d e s s p e c i a l l a n d s c a p i n g
C o s t s r e f i n e m e n t s u n d e r w a
a n d m a y c h a n g e
"
"
"
C o r r i d o r F e a t u r e s
* T o t a l C o s t
( $ B i l l i o n s )
A p p r o x i m a t e
R / W ( A c r e s )
S R - 9 1
$ 1 . 1
1 0
M a x . F e a s i b l e L a n e s . I n c l u d e s b u y o u t o f 9 1 E x p r e s s
L a n e s
C o m p a r a t i v e l y l o w e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t
C o r r i d o r
4 - L a n e
$ 3 . 5
3 1 0
R / W i m p a c t s i n C o r o n a ( b u i l t e n v i r o n m e n t )
C o m p a r a t i v e l y l o w e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t
6 - L a n e
$ 3 . 8
3 2 0
R / W i m p a c t s i n C o r o n a ( b u i l t e n v i r o n m e n t )
M i t i g a t i o n d o w n s t r e a m ( S R 2 4 1 / S R 5 5 ) C o m p a r a t i v e l y
l o w e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t
C o r r i d o r B
6 - L a n e , S u r f a c e / T u n n e l
$ 6 . 5
9 6 0
S R - 1 3 3 w i d e n i n g r e q u i r e d ( i m p a c t s i n u n b u i l t a r e a )
C o m p a r a t i v e l y h i g h e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t
6 - L a n e , T u n n e l
$ 8 . 3
2 4 0
S R - 1 3 3 w i d e n i n g r e q u i r e d ( i m p a c t s i n u n b u i l t a r e a )
C o m p a r a t i v e l y l o w e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t
4 - L a n e , S u r f a c e / T u n n e l
$ 5 . 0
6 1 0
S R - 1 3 3 w i d e n i n g r e q u i r e d ( i m p a c t s i n u n b u i l t a r e a )
C o m p a r a t i v e l y h i g h e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t
4 - L a n e , T u n n e l
$ 5 . 5
2 3 0
S R - 1 3 3 w i d e n i n g r e q u i r e d ( i m p a c t s i n u n b u i l t a r e a )
C o m p a r a t i v e l y l o w e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t
C o r r i d o r D
S u r f a c e / T u n n e 1
$ 3 . 2
6 7 0
C o s t l y w i t h c o m p a r a t i v e l y h i g h e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t
f o r l i t t l e c a p a c i t y i m p r o v e m e n t
S u r f a c e
,
$ 4 . 5
1 , 5 0 0
H i g h e s t e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t
C o s t l y f o r l i t t l e c a p a c i t y
* I n c l u d e s 2 5 % c o n t i n g e n c y , 2 5 % p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t , r i g h t o f w a y , a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l m i t i g a t i o n c o s t
r e f i n e m e A n d e r w a y a n d m a y c h a n g e .
OLO`£T$
8SS`ZT$
S9T`TT$
S8£`6$
8Z8`6$
6£6`0T$
(su oiiii IN)
Ie�oZ
•
(L99$)
(L99$)
Y0CI$
tOCT$
9011
LOZ`Z$
(anuanaH
iios)/Iioi
* * *AtopetlS
trtrttcY3 rtomg.todsttt,
ams.tAtill
u� keno apun sivaulomjal slsoa
S j 0 Z III s auel s s a i xa 16 a seta an a oiititu S S I $ apnpui ogle s am uu alit/ ai 2 a1P-11S II V * * *
000`000110£`I$=slaedmI SS HS
000`000`0911=sPedtuI ££I ?IS
000`000`0SI$= sivatuanotdug Sipudea IrZ IIS
sPedulI SS HS `slaedtuI ££i ?IS `sluatuanotdug Sipedea Ii'Z ?IS3o isoa :sapnpul**
sisoa Iuatudoianaci pafotd oksz pug Sauaupuoa oksz sapnpul*
09b$
0
0
0
00£`T$
OT9$
**•situball
Jain()
£6T`£$
£6T`£$
£6T`£$
£6T`£$
Q
.toppaoa
6T £`8$
6£S`9$
aueq-9
£T S`S$
T00`S$
aueri-f
Lt78`£$
Lt78`£$
aueZ-9
68-`£$
68-`£$
aueq-17
g .iopp.11[oa
V .iopriioa
(suoilt11 $)
* sI soa iopp io3
Z80` T $
Z80` T $
Z80` T $
Z80` T $
Z80` T $
Z80` T $
I6-2IS
I auuni III -vs
IauunZ/aaelinS III -VS
i auunZ
Iauunl/aaWnS II -VS
QI-vs
eI -VS
a niieut ally ail alenS
krumtuns lsoj 'ijiv' ol2olugs
u unoo
" o f u u r i o p u g k u m n p u n s l u a u z a u g a i s l s o p
s i s o o [ i o n m o p e d s p u r ` u o g e g p .
6 ' I .
[ ' E l $
0 a o p p i o a a u u n l
9 a o p 0 0 0 e m i t ` y a o p p i o 0 e m i t ` [ 6 - E I S
i a u u n s I I I - V S
6 ' l
[ ` [ [ $
l a u u n l a u s l - g 8 a o p i a a o < J 1 . 6 - E I S
i a u u n s I I - V S
8 ' Z
8 ' 6 $
0 a 0 1 4 1 1 0 0 ` y m p g � a u e 1 - 9 ` 5 9 - E I S ` [ 6 - E I S
( I I - V S
0 ' Z
6 ' 0 [ $
0 a o P P . 1 0 0 ` d a o p 0 0 0 a u E 1 - 9 ` 1 1 , Z - E I S ` [ 6 - H S
g I - I T S
p o o n e u a s
( s u o ! i p l e ) i s o o f
w p m
a i t m u l a i p i N J N u l l s
a A g e t u a l l y V a i m o s l s o a S I g u r t u n s
u t t o u n o o e A s J a . . , ,
"
"
IttlISSllttllt
dire 10DajAT
Noz ui i(ep .gad
salnupu zaanuzuzoo aRMnE NT anus I 6-2IS
o spaads popod luad moll-aa.z3 .eau ui ajnsag Iu02 acw) ou3e.z,L xnua agennd loow -
:sanPUuzaTjd 3-1MU-T1S ITV
(Ids ittxtj,
uom.uoo Mai sluouo
olncu kmpuooas soplAaTd pug
sloudulT soincwism go -mid& Jomnoo-pInw
(gI-dS) opmuoiciald
spud-111T iliunuzucoo 2-1,ijuomm gg-Ns
speckuT muoumaTTAuo imm
Xpsoo 21.ijuomm pug luatuu2Iteai t7L-Ns
aApoorqo uodn
-paa.de aAomou sonpuunijv 01201EJIS 11V
suIpula tealutpai
unoo a uwo unoo op! .1
•
•