Loading...
03 March 20, 2006 Technical advisory committee76184 • • • TIME: DATE: LOCATION: TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MEETING AGENDA* 10:00 A.M. March 20, 2006 Records Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA Conference Room A, 3' Floor *By request, agenda and minutes may be available in alternative format; i.e. large print, tape. COMMITTEE MEMBERS RTA Ahmad Ansari, City of Perris Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs Bill Bayne, City of Cathedral City Tom Boyd, City of Riverside Bill Brunet, City of Blythe Duane Burk, City of Banning City of Calimesa Mike Gow, City of Hemet Mark Greenwood, City of Palm Desert Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage Bill Hughes, City of Temecula George Johnson, County bf Riverside Tim Jonasson, City of LaQuinta Jim Kinley, City of Murrieta Eldon Lee, City of Coachella Caltrans District 8 Eunice Lovi, SunLine Transit Amir Modarressi, City of Indio Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake, (Perris) and San Jacinto Les Nelson, PVVTA Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley Dan Patneaude, City of Desert Hot Springs Juan Perez, County of Riverside Amad Qattan, City of Corona Ken Seumalo, City of Lake Elsinore Ruthanne Taylor Berger, WRCOG Bill Thompson, City of Norco Allyn Waggle, CVAG Tim Wassil, City of Indian Wells John Wilder, City of Beaumont Anne Mayer, Programming/Administration Director 11.36.02 • • ;RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. TIME: 10:00 A.M. DATE: March 20, 2006 LOCATION: Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA Conference Room A, 3rd Floor In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact Riverside County Transportation Commission at (9511 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. SELF -INTRODUCTION 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — February 6, 2006 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.) GRADE SEPARATION CALL FOR PROJECTS — FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS 6. RAILROAD CROSSING UPDATE 7. PROJECT DELIVERY ASSISTANCE Technical Advisory Committee Meeting • March 20, 2006 Page 2 8. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MSHCP 9. 2006 CMP UPDATE (Attachment) 10. STIP UPDATE 11. FTIP UPDATE 12. FY 05/06 OBLIGATION DELIVERY PLAN (Attachment) i 13. TE UPDATE (Attachment) 14. MARCH 8, 2006 COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS 15. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS 16. ADJOURNMENT (The next meeting will be April 17, 2006, 10:00 A.M. in Banning.) • • MINUTES • • TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, February 6, 2006 1. Call to Order The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:00 A.M., at Riverside County Transportation Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA. 2. Self -Introductions Members Present: Others Present: Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs Bill Bayne, City of Cathedral City Tom Boyd, City of Riverside Bill Brunet, City of Blythe Duane Burk, City of Banning Mark Greenwood, City of Palm Desert Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage Julee Heckermann, City of Hemet Bill Hughes, City of Temecula Tim Jonasson, City of La Quinta Eldon Lee, City of Coachella Eunice Lovi, SunLine Amir Modarressi, City of Indio Russ Napier, City of Murrieta Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley Dan Patneaude, City of Desert Hot Springs Juan Perez, County of Riverside Evita Premdas, Caltrans District 8 Amad Qattan, City of Corona Tim Wassil, City of Indian Wells Shirley Gooding, RCTC Ken Lobeck, RCTC Anne Mayer, RCTC Shirley Medina, RCTC 3. Approval of Minutes No objections. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting February 6, 2006 Page 2 4. Public Comments There were no public comments. 5. 2006 STIP SUBMITTAL • TE PROJECT PROGRAMMING Shirley Medina, RCTC, briefly reviewed the 2006 STIP Submittal Summary project listing that was sent to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on January 30. She highlighted that the TEA reserve is still being kept as reserve. There will be an amendment to the STIP when projects are ready to allocate. There is $5.7 Million available for 2006/07. The projects that are ready to go forward will be on a first come, first served basis. Ms. Medina further stated that 11 projects have been approved as eligible for TE programming by Ca!trans Headquarters. They are Moreno Valley, La Quinta, Palm Springs, city of Riverside, Cathedral City, Temecula, Indio and Corona. The others are still in the review process. January 23, 2006 RCTC Special Meeting Anne Mayer, RCTC, reported that a special RCTC Commission meeting was held on January 23 because bids were opened for the Route 60 HOV project between 1-15 and Valley Way in Mira Loma and were well over what had been allocated for the project. About $42.5 Million was allocated to the project and the low bid was $55 Million. She pointed out that due to the shortfall, staff proposed to the Commission that RCTC loan the state $12.6 Million to be able to keep the project moving. The funds will come from RCTC's unprogrammed reserve meaning that the STIP proposal that was approved at the January Commission meeting will have to be adjusted and the total western county reserve will be reduced by $12.6 Million. Funding for the 91 /Green River project, which was a 100% state funded project, is ready to list and it is expected that when bids are opened it will have an increase; therefore, RCTC has agreed to use commercial paper funds to fund the shortfall to keep the project moving. The 91 /Green River project is essential for the Route 91 widening. Payback is expected in the 2008 STIP. • Technical Advisory Committee Meeting February 6, 2006 Page 3 6. TAC SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON PROJECT DELIVERY ISSUES Shirley Medina provided a Summary Project Delivery Subcommittee Meeting report from the January 31, 2006 meeting and stated that progress is being made on Caltrans' project tracking database with internet access. The staff retention issue at Caltrans' Local Assistance is being reviewed to restructure and elevate some of the positions to provide quality staffing. Also, the Self- help counties developed an executive partnership so that certain issues that are coming up statewide concerning project delivery can be addressed. It will consist of the regional transportation funding agencies and Caltrans. Evita Premdas, Caltrans Local Assistance, stated that following the meeting, she will distribute to each city a folder of a copy of the database of all projects with detail, including project initiation documents. She encouraged careful scrutiny of the information so that the database can be updated. She could not indicate a timeline for the database to be available on the internet. She further stated that until it is available on the internet, she will provide the information at each TAC meeting. She requested that comments be submitted to her prior to each TAC meeting so that the information can be updated. The TAC members voiced their concerns and there was lengthy discussion regarding project delivery. In response to a query regarding Anne Mayer's recommendation to get action on items, she suggested that when calling Caltrans for the status of projects, the agencies should know the projects, where they are, what the action items are, what the status is and Local Assistance will review the projects with each agency. She further recommended not allowing projects to sit for extended periods of time without a decision. Sometimes telephoning a senior or deputy will be necessary. Ms. Premdas stated that she will suggest to Bill Mosby, Caltrans District 8, that if there are any issues or complaints regarding projects, Local Assistance engineers do follow ups to help the agencies internally. She further suggested that other problems be coordinated initially with local area engineers and once status has been determined, Bill Mosby should be copied as a follow up. Ms. Medina indicated that another subcommittee meeting will be scheduled and a report will be made to the next TAC meeting. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting February 6, 2006 Page 4 In response to a suggestion to develop an e-mail questionnaire to determine interest in funding a position, Ms. Mayer indicated that a draft questionnaire will be developed for the next subcommittee meeting and if approved, it will be sent to the TAC. 7. 2006 FTIP UPDATE Ken Lobeck, RCTC, said the 2006 TIP is almost complete. There is a lot of detail work on the interchanges because of the level of modeling and the scrutiny the projects are under due to the environmental document. Discussions with FHWA involve how detailed the FTIP needs to be regarding the project descriptions. He explained that the grace year for the SAFETEA-LU for the RTP means that in July 2007 there might be a programming lockdown in that no new projects will be allowed. 8. JANUARY 11, 2006 COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS Shirley Medina stated that regarding the STIP agenda item, additional adjustments to certain projects may be made and presented to the Commission, depending on the outcome of the California Transportation Commission staff review. A south county public hearing will be held in Los Angeles on March 9. Prior to that meeting, staff comments are expected. 9. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS Regarding CMP, the floating car runs were done last week and Ms. Medina will provide the results to the TAC via e-mail. Ms. Medina provided a January 24, 2006 letter from Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority regarding the 5% fee for TUMF projects for freeway interchanges. As indicated in the letter, "the MSHCP portion of the TUMF update should not include mitigation for interchanges." Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley, announced the Executive Committee meeting today at 2:00 to review the proposed fee schedule. The fee schedule does not request an adjustment for this issue. In response to a query regarding the strategic plan for the Measure A extension, Ms. Mayer stated that it is not being called a strategic plan. It is called a ten-year delivery plan and in December, the Commission approved 0 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting ' February 6, 2006 Page 5 the contract with Bechtel to look at the projects that are included in the 2009 Measure and for Bechtel to do an objective assessment of the priorities. Besides preparing the ten-year delivery plan, from a project perspective the revenues for Measure A are being updated. She further stated that the focus is the highway component. Regional arterials will come next. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 A.M. The next meeting is scheduled for March 20, 2006, 10:00 A.M., Riverside County Transportation Commission, Riverside County Regional Complex, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA Conference Room A, 3`d Floor. Respectfully submitted, LCt,:24; Shirley Medina Program Manager • AGENDA ITEM 5 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 5. j— RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: March 27, 2006 TO: Plans and Programs Committee FROM: Stephanie Wiggins, Regional` Programs Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Programming and Administration Director SUBJECT: Award of Alameda Corridor East (ACE) SAFETEA--LU Earmark STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Allocate $21 Million of the $31.25 Million of RCTC SAFETEA-LU ACE Earmark funds as presented in Table A which represents the amount requested by the local agencies; 2) Condition the allocation of $6 Million to the. City ,of -Riverside for Jurupa Avenue contingent upon the reallocation of $6 Million in Local Funds towards the design and construction of other railroad grade separation projects in their City; 3) Authorize a 10-year loan from the Commercial Paper Program for up to $1.5 million for the Sunset Avenue Grade Separation Project which represents the maximum Commercial Paper amount available to the City of Banning; 4) Designate the remaining unprogrammed balance of $10.25 Million for construction funding for a Tier 1 or 'Tier 2 crossing(s) to be made available on a rolling "first come/first serve" basis; and 5) Forward to the Commission for final approval BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In July 2005, Congress approved the reauthorization of the Federal Transportation Bill which is now known as SAFETEA-LU. Among the categories of earmarks are the "Projects of National and Regional Significance." The Commission joined with others in seeking an earmark for the Alameda Corridor East (ACE). The funds will be split evenly between Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange and Los Angeles Counties and used to mitigate the impacts of ever-increasing freight traffic. The Commission anticipates $31.25 to be available for allocation to address immediate grade separation needs. Ca/1 for Projects Guidelines At its December 2005 meeting, the Commission authorized the release of a Call for Projects and approved the evaluation criteria for the Call. The guidelines for the Call for Projects areas follows: • Eligible Projects encompass Tier 1 and 2 grade crossings (approved in October 2005) with an allowance for additional crossings substantially impacted by switching activities: BNSF (SB SUB) 1 Magnolia Av Riverside County BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Chicago Av Riverside BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 3rd St Riverside BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Columbia Av (BNSF) Riverside BNSF (SB SUB) McKinley St Corona BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Iowa Av (BNSF) Riverside BNSF (SB SUB) Adams St Riverside BNSF(SB SUB) Smith Av Corona UP (YUMA MAIN) Sunset Av Banning BNSF (SB SUB) Tyler St Riverside BNSF (SB SUB) Mary St Riverside UP (LA SUB) Jurupa Rd Riverside County BNSF (SB SUB) Auto Center Dr Corona UP (YUMA MAIN) Hargrave St Banning UP (LA SUB) Magnolia Av Riverside BNSF (SB SUB) Madison St Riverside UP (YUMA MAIN) Avenue 48/Dillon Road Indio/Coachella BNSF & UP (SB SUB) Center St Riverside County UP (LA SUB) Clay St Riverside County BNSF & UP (SB SUB) 7th St Riverside UP (LA SUB) Jurupa Ave Riverside UP (LA SUB) Streeter Ave (due to switching) Riverside UP (LA SUB Riverside Ave (due to switching) Riverside • Evaluation criteria of submittals emphasizes Project Delivery; • Maximum award of $7.5 million (federal) per grade separation project with an additional allowance of $7.5 million from the Commercial Paper Program via a 10-year loan per project, if requested by applicant in accordance with Commission policy; and • 'Application submissions limited to 2 per jurisdiction. Award Recommendation of $21 Million Local agency staff" actively participated in the Call development process. Their input was constructive and lead to an effective collaboration in designing the Call. The process was initiated by performing a switching analysis on four Tier 3 crossings (Streeter Avenue, Brockton Avenue, and Riverside Avenue in the City of Riverside and 22nd Street in the City of Banning) to determine if there was a substantial impact on delay from switching activity that would impact their total score. The incorporation of switching delay substantially increased the total scores of the Streeter Avenue and Riverside Avenue crossings so as to move their Priority Group up from Tier 3, thereby making them eligible for the Call for Projects. While the total scores of the Brockton Avenue and 22nd Street crossings did increase, it was not significant enough to move them out of Priority Group 3. A Constraint Analysis was performed on the 23 eligible crossings by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc (PB). The purpose was to identify right-of-way impacts, aesthetics, community impacts; and constructability of a grade separation I at each crossing. PB then developed general 'cost estimates for each crossing in i conjunction with the local agencies. The total cost estimates for the 23 crossings is $918 Million. Given that $31 Million is available for the Call, the application submittals focused on Project Readiness. A total of 6 projects from 5 agencies requesting $21 Million were received: Table A: SAFETEA LU Award Recommendation Crossing Jurisdiction SAFETEA- LU Request Commercial Paper Request Total Project Cost Est Completion Date Construction Ave 48/Dillon Rd Coachella/Indio $2,500,000 $0 $16,107,000 June 2007 Jurupa Ave' Riverside $6,000,000 $0 $21,740,000 June 2008 Sunset Ave Banning $7,500,000 $1,500,000 $21,000,000 July2008 Subtotal $16,000,000 $1,500,000 $58,847,000 Project Development Auto Center Dr Corona $1,500,000 $27,000,000 Clay St Riverside County $2,500,000 $22,920,000 McKinley St Corona $1,000,000 $109,200,000 Subtotal $5,000,000 $159,120,000 TOTALS $21,000,000 $1,500,000 $217,967,000 *The City of Riverside allocation request is contingent upon City Council approval for reallocating $6 million in Measure A funds from the Jurupa Avenue Underpass project towards the design and construction of other railroad grade separation projects in the City. (see Attachment 1) The Constraint Analysis and Cost Estimates are useful in outlining project delivery challenges. The award supports projects that are further along in the development process, while also recognizing the need to jump start priority projects. The project benefits of these crossings are outlined below: Table B: Project Benefits Crossing 2005 Gate Down Time per Day 2030 Gate Down Time per Day Accidents (last 10 yrs) 2030 Emissions (tons/yr) Ave 48/Dillon Rd 1 hr, 14 min 2 hrs, 21 min 2 8 Jurupa Ave 1 hr, 23 min 2 hrs, 42 min 2 5 Sunset Ave 1 hr, 41 min 3 hrs, 21 min 1 19 Auto Center Dr 1 hr, 53 min 3 hrs, 30 min 1 20 Clay St 1 hr, 24 min 2 hrs, 42 min 1 12 McKinley St 1 hr, 45 min 3 hrs, 21 min 3 27 TOTALS 9 hrs, 20 min 17 hrs, 57 min 10 92 Unprogrammed Balance of $10.25 Mil/ion Staff and the local agencies recognize the need for timely use of funds for project delivery. Therefore, the recommendation is that the remaining unprogrammed balance of $10.25 Million be designated for construction of eligible projects designated as Tier 1 and 2 Crossings. Jurisdictions are able to submit their application for these funds whenever the ,project is; shelf ready and the jurisdiction has a funding plan for delivery_ Attachment: March 14, 2006 City of Riverside Letter i • AGENDA ITEM 6 • A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 6. • peed and Length Assumptions 2005 Study Assumptions 2005 2030 Rail Road Line Freight Speed Passenger Speed Freight Length (ft) Metrolink Length (ft) Amtrak Length (ft) Freight Speed Passenger Speed Freight Length (ft) Metrolink Length (ft) Amtrak Length (ft) UP (LA SUB) 50-65 50-65 5400 1000 50-65 50-65 8000 1000 BNSF (SB SUB) 50 50 5400 1000 3000 50 50 8000 1000 3000 BNSF & UP 40-50 40-50 5400 1000 3000 40-50 40-50 • 8000 1000 3000 UP (YUMA) 50 50 5400 3000 50 50 8000 3000 UP (YUMA) Coachellaw 50 50 5400 3000 50 50 8000 3000 Updated Analysis Assumptions 2005 2030 Rail Road Line Freight Speed Passenger Speed Freight Length (ft) Metrolink Length (ft) Amtrak Length (ft) Freight Speed Passenger Speed Freight Length (ft) Metrolink Length (ft) Amtrak Length (ft) UP (LA SUB) 30(a) 60Ca) 4000 500 30(a) 60(a) 6000 750 BNSF (SB SUB) 40 55(b) 4900 500 1000 40 55(b) 7350 750 1000 BNSF & UP 30 45 4700 500 1000 30 45 7050 750 1000 UP (YUMA) 25 40 4300 1000 25 40 6450 1000 UP (YUMA) Coachellam 40 50 4300 1000 40 50 6450 1000 (a) Riverside crossing wil have a freight speed of 25 mph and a passenger speed of 45 mph due to slow speed approching the rail line merge (b) Lower passenger speed of 40 mph at Auto Center crossing due to near -by station (c) faster speeds through Coachella (Ave 48 - Ave 66) Trains Per Da v Assumptions 2005 Study Rail Road Line 2005 2030 Freight Metrolink Amtrak Freight Metrolink Amtrak UP (LA SUB) 42 12 0 85 28 0 BNSF (SB SUB) 68 21 2 120 36 4 BNSF & UP 110 9 2 194 24 4 UP (YUMA) 46 0 1 87 0 1 Updated Analysis Rail Road Line 2005 2030 Freight Metrolink Amtrak Freight Metrolink Amtrak UP (LA SUB) 30 12 0 45 28 0 BNSF (SB SUB) 41 25 2 62 38 4 BNSF & UP (Cridge) 71 33 2 107 62 4 BNSF & UP 71 8 2 107 24 4 UP (YUMA) 36 0 1 54 0 1 * Metrolink numbers from sum of 91 line and Inland Empire-OC line trains (normal operating schedule) * Following the 2005 Study, a 50% growth was applied to train numbers for 2030 data * Cridge has 33 (2005) and 62 (2030) Metrolink trains (BNSF plus BNSF&UP) Train Numbers and -Time of Dav 2005 2030 Rail Road Line # of Freight Trains # of Metrolink Trains # of Amtrak Trains Time Period # of Freight Trains # of Metrolink Trains # of Amtrak Trains Time Period UP (LA SUB) 13 2 0 Eve/Night 20 7 0 Eve/Night 7 7 0 Peak 10 14 0 Peak 10 3 0 Midday 15 7 0 Midday BNSF (SB SUB) 22 3 0 Eve/Night 33 4 0 Eve/Night 10 14 2 Peak 15 22 4 Peak 9 8 0 Midday 14 12 0 Midday BNSF & UP 34 4 0 Eve/Night 51 9 0 Eve/Night Cridge 19 19 2 Peak 29 34 4 Peak 18 10 0 Midday 27 19 0 Midday BNSF & UP 34 1 0 Eve/Night 51 5 0 Eve/Night 19 5 2 Peak 29 12 4 Peak 18 2 0 Midday 27 7 0 Midday UP (YUMA) 13 0 0 Eve/Night 20 0 0 Eve/Night 11 0 1 Peak 17 0 1 Peak 12 0 0 Midday 18 0 0 Midday Peak Hours = 5 am - 8 am and 3 pm - 7 pm Midday Hours = 8am - 3 pm Evening/Night Hours = 7 pm - 5 am Switching/Operational Delay: Trains were considered to fall under this category through the comparison of count data on adjacent crossings on the same date. These comparisons noted the individual trains which did not travel though the adjacent crossings during comparative times. These noted trains were then considered "switching/operational delay" if their speeds were slow (<20 mph), their gate down time was substantial (>1:00), and they were not overly lengthy (< 10 cars) which would increase gate down time. Crossings at which comparisons could not be made defined "switching/operational delay" trains as trains which had slow speeds (<20 mph), substantial gate down time (>1:00), and were not overly lengthy (< 10 cars). The individual switching/operational delay at each counted crossing will be used in the updated analysis, and a typical switching/operational delay will be asigned to all other crossings on each rail line. Any individual crossing with lower switching/operational delay than the typical will be bumped up to match the typical delay for that rail line. Below are the assigned switching/operational delay. Switching/Operational Delay Assumptions Rail Road Line Switch/Oper. Trains per Day Switch/Oper. Gate Down Time per Day -Time Switch/Oper. Gate Down Time per Night -Time Typical Switch/Oper. Day -time Delay Typical Switch/Oper. Night-time Delay UP (LA SUB) 0:06:00 0:04:00 Jurupa Rd 6 0:22:39 0:31:22 Clay 1 0:01:18 0:05:02 Streeter 2 0:11:37 0:06:36 Brockton 0 0:03:10 0:00:00 Magnolia 2 0:19:25 0:00:00 Riverside 3 0:20:01 0:11:55 BNSF (SB SUB) 0:02:00 0:00:00 Auto Center 6 0:10:19 0:00:00 Mc Kinley 1 0:03:29 0:00:00 Adams 0 0:01:31 0:00:00 BNSF & UP 0:05:00 0:01:00 7th 2 0:05:16 0:01:14 Center 3 0:06:50 0:00:34 UP (YUMA) 0:05:00 0:02:00 Sunset 1 0:04:51 0:00:00 22nd 1 0:07:16 0:00:00 Hargrave 5 0:14:15 0:03:22 Ave 54 4 0:10:35 0:02:38 Total Priority Comparison as of 3/20/06 Ref No. Cross Street October Study Update - Base Assmp. Update - Switching Jurisdiction Overall Weighted Score Group by percentile Overall Weighted Score Group by percentile Overall Weighted Score Group by percentile 1 Jurupa Rd Riverside County 3462 2 3512 2 4412 i1 2 Chicago Av Riverside 4380 4525 1 4330 1 4330 1 3 Magnolia Av Riverside County 1 4250 1 4250 1 4 3rd St Riverside 4060 1 4010 1 4010 1 5 McKinley St Corona 3950 1 3950 1 3950 1 6 Columbia Av (BNSF) Riverside 4000 1 3950 1 3950 1 7 Magnolia Av Riverside 3380 2 3355 2 <;._3880 - t --,- 8 Sunset Av Banning 3500 2 3800 1 3800 1 9 Riverside Av Riverside 2810 3 3010 ' 2 11,237785 `' 10 Iowa Av (BNSF) Riverside 3820 1 3770 1 3770 1 11 Adams St Riverside 3665 1 3590 2 3665 2 .12 13 Auto Center Dr Corona 3438 2 3238 2 3638 2 Hargrave St Banning 3425 2 3625 2 3625 2 2 14 Clay St Riverside County 3235 3613 2 2 3535 2 3535 15 Smith Av Corona 3263 2 3263 2 16 7th St Riverside 3135 2 2910 2 3110 2 17 Tyler St Riverside 3500 2 3075 2 3100 2 18 22nd St Banning 2375 3 3100 2 3100 2 19 Avenue 48/Dillon Road Indio/Coachella 3325 2 2875 2 3075 2 20 Center St Riverside County 3283 2 2808 2 3008 2 121 San Gorgonio Av Banning 2300 4 2800 2 3000 2 22 Streeter Av Riverside 2515 3 2265 3 , 2965, 2 23 Jurupa Ave Riverside not included in study 2700 2 2925 2 24 Palmyrita Av (UP) Riverside 3010 3 2835 2 2835 2 25 Spruce St (BNSF) Riverside 2845 3 i 2695 2 2695 2 26 Madison St Riverside 3340 2 2640 2 2690 2 {27 Brockton Av Riverside 2400 3 2250 3 2650 2 . , 128 Mary St Riverside 3465 2 2640 2 2640 2 129 Pierce St Riverside 3090 3 2590 3 2590 3 i 30 31 Avenue 62 Riverside County 2525 3 2544 3 2544 3 Railroad St Corona 2925 3 2475 3 2475 3 32 Panorama Rd Riverside 1290_ 4 1365 4 '2465 ,, 33 Buchanan St _ Riverside 2800 3 2400 3 2400 3 34 Bellgrave Av Riverside County 2048 4 2123 3 2348 3 35 Avenue 66 Riverside County 2158 4 2065 4 ,2265 36 Palm Av Riverside 1965 4 2040 4 x''2265 37 Avenue 52 Coachella 2233 4 2033 4 2251, 38 California Av Beaumont 1500 4 2000 4 2200, t .z, 39 San Timoteo Canyon Rd Calimesa 2100 4 2100 3 2100 3 40 Washington St Riverside 2580 3 1880 4 2080 4 41 Apache Trail Riverside County 1727 4 2052 4 2052 4 42 Rutile St Riverside County 1746 4 1796 4 2046 4 43 Jefferson St Riverside 2380 3 2030 4 2030 „4 44 Cridge St Riverside 2650 3 2025 4" 2025 4 45 Viele Av Beaumont 1983 4 1983 4 1983 4 46 Cota St Corona 2113 4 1938 4 1938 4 47 Broadway Riverside County 1604 4 1904 4 1904 4 48 Mountain View Av Riverside 1450 4 1450 4 1650 4 49 Airport Drive Riverside County 1892 4 1592 4 1592 4 50 Main St Riverside County 1681 4 1531 4 1531 4 51 Jackson St Riverside 1805 4 1330 4 1330 4 52 Pennsylvania Av Beaumont 917 5 1242 4 1267 4 53 Joy St Corona 1525 4 1250 4 1250 4 54 Harrison St Riverside 1545 4 1120 4 1120 4 55 Tipton Rd Palm Springs 1100 _ 5 1100 4 1100 4 56 Radio Rd Corona 1400 4 1075 5 1075 5 57 158 Jane St Avenue 54 Riverside 1310 4 860 5 1060 5 Coachella Riverside County Corona _ 767 5 5 767 5 767 5 159 Avenue 58 638 813 688 5 688 5 60 Sheridan St 5 663 5 663 5 61 Gibson St Riverside 695 5 520 5 520 5 Change in priority group from October study Change in priority group due to switching • • AGENDA ITEM 7 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 7. - DRAFT - Memorandum of Understanding Between the Riverside County Transportation Commission on Behalf of Local Agencies and the California Department of Transportation District 08 Regarding Project Delivery Issues Resolution This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), entered into effect on date between the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), acting on behalf of local agencies, and the California Department of Transportation (Department) District 08 outlines the general areas of responsibility for various project development activities, including reviews and approvals, for proposed improvements including but not limited to, state highways (non-SHOPP), local arterials, transit/rail, and bridge projects. This MOU constitutes a guide to the intentions and strategies of the parties involved and is not intended to authorize funding or project effort nor is it a legally binding contract. This MOU covers project development, oversight, obligation of funds, expenditures, and all other activities that require the administration of funds and/or project approvals from the Department, starting with initial project development phases through project closeout. Cooperative Agreements will continue to be required for specific state highway projects. The intent of this MOU would serve as an enhancement to the Cooperative Agreements entered between the Department and Commission/Local agencies for state highway projects that require Cooperative Agreements. INTENT The intent of this MOU is to establish a true partnership between the Department, Commission and Local Agencies to improve project delivery, and define how the entities will work together as one Project Team to successfully deliver projects in a timely and efficient manner. GENERAL The Commission and Local Agencies serve as lead agency for various projects consisting of federal, state, and local fund sources. The administration of state and federal funds is the responsibility of the Department Office of Local Assistance. Project approvals on or off the state highway system, regardless of the fund source, is the responsibility of the Department. The Commission and Local Agencies desire to streamline, to the extent possible, the processes established to administer state and federal projects including improved communications with the Department. Further, a better understanding of the - DRAFT - within 3 ?? days describing the actions needed to complete and correct the submittal. 4) All Department comments must be in writing and sent to lead agency and/or designee at one time, instead of piecemeal. 5) The Department will immediately notify the lead agency of any staff changes affecting their project and will fully inform the new staff of status and key decisions/commitments previously agreed upon. 6) The Department will strive to meet the agreements contained in this MOU and if any conditions arise that prevent any of the items in this agreement from being met, the Department will immediately inform the Commission and lead agencies. 7) Train Department staff on any areas that are problematic in project delivery including conferring with other Districts and Headquarters, the Commission, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Agency. 8) Continue to provide courses and workshops to the Commission, Local agencies and consultants on processing federal -aid projects. 9) Allocate sufficient staff to manage volume of projects. Commission and Local Agencies agree to: 1) Ensure key staff is knowledgeable with the federal -aid project process by attending training courses offered by the Department, FHWA, or other qualified training institution. 2) Notify Department staff prior to submitting project documents that the document is being mailed or hand delivered, and indicate the key local agency contact person. 3) Local agency staff will contract with consultants experienced with the federal aid process, closely monitor their work, and aware of all correspondence between Department and consultant. 4) Notify the Department of any changes in local agency staff or consultant assignments. 5) Hold and attend project status meetings/project delivery team (PDT) meetings (PDT), if applicable, and respond to Department questions expeditiously and in writing. - DRAFT - 6) The Commission and local agencies will strive to meet the agreements contained in this MOU and if any conditions arise that prevent any of the agreements from being met, the Commission and local agencies will immediately inform the Department. 7) The Commission and local agencies will work strategically and cooperatively in planning and programming projects to distribute project activity throughout the year and provide for realistic project scheduling. ISSUES RESOLUTION In the event the Department, Commission, or local agency encounters a problem with project delivery, including the above terms of agreement, the Issues Resolution will serve as a guide in resolving any disagreements or concerns encountered during any phase of project delivery. It is the intent of the Commission, the Department, and local agencies to resolve issues at the lowest level possible. However, issues arise in the project life -cycle and they need to be resolved as diligently as possible requiring the need to be elevated to upper management when consensus cannot be obtained. Therefore, the following levels describe how issues are to be elevated in the event the issues cannot be resolved within each level of the project team. First Level Team: Project Manager and Department Staff (below Deputy Director level) Issues will arise in the midst of the project team's effort to develop the project. Many of these issues can be resolved within the project team's level, especially those that do not change the scope of the Project, do not require additional budget and that do not delay the approved schedule. The staff involved will review issues that arise, discuss the options for resolution, the pros and cons to each option, and any advocate's reasons in support of a specific option(s). Provided the resolution does not change the scope, cost and schedule of the project, the first level team should determine the outcome. If the first level team either does not have sufficient authority to resolve the issue or is unable to agree, then they will elevate the issue immediately, within 3 days, to the second level team. Second Level Team: Public Works/Planning Director or City Engineer and Department's Local Assistance Deputy Director The first level team will prepare a document presenting the issue, options for resolution, and the pros and cons to each option including any advocate's - DRAFT - reasons in support of specific options. This level should determine the outcome of the resolution provided they have sufficient authority to resolve the issue. If not, then they will elevate the issue immediately, within 3 days, to the third level team. Third Level Team: City Manager/Mayor/Councilmember and Department's District Director The third (and final) level team will review the document prepared by the first level team with additional comments provided by the second level team. The issue must be resolved within this level. If for some reason, the issue cannot be fully resolved without approval from the City Council and/or the Department, then the third level team will direct preparation of agenda items for any required action needed to ratify their agreed upon solution. Decisions made at each review level are to be documented by the Project Manager or a designee thereof and stored in the project file to become a permanent part of the project history. OMBUDSMAN SERVICE QUERY City Interested? Willing to Pay? Banning No response No response Beaumont No response No response Blythe No response No response CVAG No response No response Calimesa No response No response Canyon Lake Yes Yes Cathedral City No response No response Coachella No No Corona No response No response Desert Hot Springs Yes Subject to council Hemet Yes Subject to council Indian Wells Yes Yes Indio Yes Yes La Quinta Yes Yes Lake Elsinore No response No response Moreno Valley Yes -not for individual agencies Murrieta No No Norco Willing to discuss Willing to discuss Palm Desert Yes Yes Palm Springs N res e„—,T y`_S -1 e-respeAss >ie s Perris Yes Yes PVVTA No response No response RTA No No Rancho Mirage No No City of Riverside No response No response Riverside County No No San Jacinto Yes Yes SunLine No response No response Temecula Yes Yes, subject to council WRCOG No response No response • AGENDA ITEM 8 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 8. • MYYBIYMIN A11l013RBllpE1l1NlWd Y 11 Mrld MAI= 111 =di 110111111 MEM EISA RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED PROJECT - "RCIP" •'• • Land use and infrastructure decisions driven by environmental issues, especially endangered and threatened species ❖ Deal with environmental issues as a component of land use and infrastructure planning ❖ Three-part integrated and complementary program: ■ Transportation ■ General Plan (Land Use) ■ Habitat Conservation Wes ern Riverside Coun y Mu iple Speees Habitat Conservation Plan ❖ Spearheaded by Riverside County Board of Supervisors (as the linchpin to the RCIP) ❖ Ultimately supported by 14 Western Riverside County Cities ❖ Adopted in 2003 ❖ Designed to protect up to146 species (32 listed species) ❖ Plan area encompasses 1.2 million acres in Western Riverside County ❖ Planned reserve of 500,000 acres ❖ 347,000 acres existing (Federal, State and local public lands) • Approximately 153,000 acres of Additional Reserve Lands PLAN STRUCTURE ❖ 300,000 acres designated for potential conservation (no hard line) + Criteria cells (160 acres each) ❖ Each cell contains conservation objectives ❖ Assemble a reserve of 153,000 acres out of 300,000 acres ❖ Linkages to core areas a,co E t s> b;;d! �>� # I Acquisition of Land ❖ Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Process: negotiation of conserved area •'• Direct purchase Funding Strategy ❖ Fair share -Local, State and Federal ❖ Local Funding ■ Development mitigation fees ■ Landfill fees ■ Infrastructure contribution + State participation ❖ Federal participation TABLE LOCAL PUBLIC/REGIONAL FUNDING SOURCES Source Anticipated $ Range Requirements to Implement Responsible Party Public Funding Sources El Sobrante Landfill County Landfills Eagle Mountain Landfill Local Roads Other Transportation Other infrastructure Projects Flood Control Private Funding Sources: Cities and County Development Mitigation Fees Density Bonus Fees $90M In place $10M In place $unknown In place pending start-up $121M Approval of Measure A, local agreement on allocation $250M % of new road construction 3%-5% Project -by -project negotiation $19M $539.6M Approval of County ordinance Approval of City(s) ordinance $66M Approval of General Plan County County County RCTC/Co unty County County and Cities RCFCWCD TABLE 8=2 TOTAL LOCAL PROGRAM COSTS (not adjusted for inflation) 25 years and 75 years Program Costs '�w. First 25 ears 75 years �.- :n C';...:Y,iti'* m i".. ` s. ;� _,r °v§"'7^`rt- Acquisition of Additional Reserve Lands (56,000 acres) $733.6M $733.6M Preserve Management (152,000acres) $111M $424.5M Adaptive Management (152,000acres) $44.5M $214.3M Biological Monitoring (152,000 acres) $34.7M $112M Program Administration $30M $ 55M TOTAL COSTS $953.8M $1,539,4M E coo ❖ Coverage for critical infrastructure projects • Comply with design requirements • Contribution (3%-5%) to Plan ❖ Local control of environmental process ❖ Certainty in development process ❖ Permits for city projects ❖ Open space secured ❖ Public access of natural areas ❖ Over 75% of conservation occurs outside city boundaries ❖ State and Federal participation in funding ❖ Umbrella Federal and State permits to "take" endangered species What is the RCA? A Joint Powers Authority created to implement the MSCHP Comprised of: 14 Western Riverside County cities and the County of Riverside. RCA Obligations Under the Plan ❖ Collect and expend local development mitigation fees ❖ Purchase lands to assemble the Reserve and coordinate assembly of the conservation lands ❖ Coordinate implementation with Cities and County ❖ Manage and monitor conservation lands ❖ Administer and oversee implementation of the MSHCP permits ❖ RCA is not a regulatory agency •S RCA has no land use authority County and City Obligations + Collect local development mitigation fees and remit to RCA ❖ Contribution from infrastructure • Negotiate with developers to conserve lands needed for reserve ❖ Comply with policies to protect species as identified in plan • Conduct joint project review with RCA to ensure project/actions are in consistent with the Plan ❖ Participate in RCA ❖ Enforce terms of project approvals to ensure compliance with MSHCP°t co` w,. Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly California Gnatcatcher Quino Checkerspot Butterfly • AGENDA ITEM 9 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 20, 2006 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager SUBJECT: 2006 Congestion Management Program Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the TAC to: 1) Review the updated traffic count information provided in the attachment; and 2) Approve the 2006 Congestion Management Program Update and forward to the Commission at its April 12, 2006 meeting for formal adoption. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the November TAC meeting, the TAC recommended to continue the CMP update item to allow more time to review the traffic count data in specific areas. At the January 2006 TAC meeting, the TAC requested that VRPA take additional traffic counts along 1-215, SR 79, Alessandro Boulevard in Western County, and update counts along Ramon Road and Monterey Avenue in the Coachella Valley. Georgiena Vivian of VRPA Technologies will attend the March 20 TAC meeting to report on the results and answer any questions. We ask that TAC members refer to the CMP update document that was mailed to the TAC members in November. Please contact Shirley Gooding if you need another copy. TABLE 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP RAW DATA - FLOATING CAR RUN -1-15 AM SB Node # 1 Length 0 Node Names Jurupa St off ramp Travel Time # o Stops Avg Speed Time <= 0 MPH Time <= 10 MPH Time <= 30 MPH 2 7846 SR-60 106.0 0.0 50.5 0.0 0.3 17.0 3 16948 Limonite Ave 163.7 0.0 70.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 14072 Bth St 141.3 0.0 67.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 10239 2nd St 105.0 0.0 66.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 4094 Hidden Valley Pkwy 40.7 0.0 68.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 7246 SR-91 72.0 0.0 68.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 6108 Magnolia Ave 60.3 0.0 69.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 8610 Ontario Rd 86.7 0.0 67.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 4651 El Cerrito Rd 46.7 0.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 5412 Cajalco Rd 52.3 0.0 70.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 6084 Weirick Rd 60.0 0.0 69.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 12659 Temescal Canyon Rd 125.3 0.0 68.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 14984 Indian Truck Trail 149.7 0.0 68.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 19650 Lake St 188.0 0.0 71.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 16 14969 Nichols Rd 145.3 0.0 70.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 8243 Central Ave 81.3 0.0 69.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 6835 Main St 68.0 0.0 68.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 9439 Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr 96.0 0.0 67.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20 15014 Bundy Canyon Rd 147.7 0.0 69.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 21 6501 Baxter Rd 60.7 0.0 73.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 22 7649 Clinton Kieth Rd 74.0 0.0 70.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 23 15928 Califomia Oaks/Kalmia St 157.7 0.0 68.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 24 5975 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 58.3 0.0 69.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 25 4461 I-215/1-15 split 43.7 0.0 69.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 26 10623 Winchester Rd 108.7 0.0 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27 8526 Rancho California Rd 84.3 0.0 68.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 28 6326 SR-79S SB Ramp 71.7 0.0 60.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 259092 2595.0 0.0 68.1 0.0 0.3 17.0 1-15 AM-SB- Study Stats TABLE 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CHIP Node # 1 Length 0 RAW DATA - FLOATING Node Names I SR-79S NB Ramp Travel Time CAR RUN # of Stops - I-15 Avg Speed AM Time <= 0 MPH NB Time <= 10 MPH Time <- 30 MP 2 6970 Rancho California Rd 69.3 0.0 68.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 8601 Winchester Rd 83.0 0.0 70.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 11350 I-215/1-15 split 106.3 0.0 72.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 3677 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 33.7 0.0 74.5 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 6 6102 California Oaks/Kalmia St 59.7 0.0 69.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 15972 Clinton Kieth Rd 151.7 0.0 71.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 7471 Baxter Rd 69.0 0.0 73.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 6552 Bundy Canyon Rd 62.0 0.0 72.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 15215 Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr 146.0 0.0 71.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 9312 Main St 90.3 0.0 70.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 , 12 6845 Central Ave 65.7 0.0 71.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 8328 Nichols Rd 80.0 0.0 71.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 15056 Lake St 145.0 0.0 70.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 19456 Indian Truck Trail 186.3 0.0 71.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 16 15079 Temescal Canyon Rd 197.7 0.7 52.0 1.0 9.3 ' 54.3 17 12576 Weirick Rd 433.0 4.3 19.8 25.0 93.7 365.7 18 6098 Cajalco Rd 166.7 0.7 24.9 1.7 11.3 121.0 19 5383 El Cerrito Rd 85.3 0.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 20 4570 Ontario Rd 49.3 0.0 63.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 21 8728 Magnolia Ave 115.0 0.0 51.7 0.0 0.0 33.0 22 6003 SR-91 63.7 0.0 64.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 23 7302 Hidden Valley Pkwy 125.0 0.7 39.8 1.0 13.0 55.7 24 4008 2nd St 159.7 1.3 17.1 2.3 45.7 147.7 25 10337 6th St 223.3 0.3 31.6 4.0 9.0 100.3 26 13999 Limonite Ave 259.0 0.7 36.9 1.7 13.0 82.3 27 16912 SR-60 216.0 0.0 53.4 0.0 1.7 20.3 28 8322 Jurupa St off ramp 131.7 0.0 43.1 0.0 0.0 35.7 Total 260224 3573.3 8.7 49.7 36.7 1-15 AM -NB- Study Stats TABLE 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP RAW DATA FLOATING CAR RUN -1-15 PM SB Node # 1 Length 0 Node Names Jurupa St off ramp Travel Time # of Stops Avg Speed Time <= 0 MPH Time <= 10 MPH Time <= 30 MP 2 7860 SR-60 166.7 0.7 32.2 2.0 13.3 89.3 3 16946 Limonite Ave 296.7 1.3 38.9 4.7 15.0 113.3 4 14044 6th St 181.7 0.0 52.7 0.0 4.7 25.0 5 10208 2nd St 122.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 6 4086 Hidden Valley Pkwy 42.0 0.0 66.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 7373 SR-91 76.0 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 6021 Magnolia Ave 97.3 0.0 42.2 0.0 0.0 46.0 9 8631 Ontario Rd 297.0 1.0 19.8 2.0 34.0 274.3 10 4628 El Cerrito Rd 124.0 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 94.0 11 5420 Cajalco Rd 65.0 0.0 56.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 6086 Weirick Rd 65.0 0.0 63.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 12579 Temescal Canyon Rd 133.7 0.0 64.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 15029 Indian Truck Trail 146.0 0.0 70.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 19641 Lake St 188.7 0.0 71.0 0.0 0.0 O. 16 14926 Nichols Rd 141.3 0.0 72.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 8316 Central Ave 79.3 0.0 71.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 6821 Main St 66.0 0.0 70.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 9373 Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr 92.0 0.0 69.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 14997 Bundy Canyon Rd 145.0 0.0 70.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 21 6603 Baxter Rd 65.0 0.0 69.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 22 7639 Clinton Kieth Rd 75.3 0.0 69.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 23 15959 California Oaks/Kalmia St 156.7 0.0 69.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 24 5921 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 57.3 0.0 70.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 25 3999 I-215/I-15 split 38.0 0.0 71.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 26 11042 Winchester Rd 108.0 0.0 69.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27 8686 Rancho Califomia Rd 84.3 0.0 70.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 28 6294 SR-79S SB Ramp 66.7 0.0 64.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 259128 3176.7 3.0 55.6 8.7 67.0 1-15 PM-SB- Study Stats TABLE 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP Node # 1 Length 0 RAW DATA - FLOATING Node Names SR-79S NB Ramp Travel Time CAR # of Stops RUN - 1-15 Avg Speed PM Time <= 0 MPH NB Time <= 10 MPH Time <= 30 MPH 2 7060 Rancho California Rd 158.7 0.7 30.3 3.0 14.7 99.0 3 8672 Winchester Rd 219.0 1.0 27.0 2.7 14.3 144. 4 11266 I-215/1-15 split 143.3 0.0 53.6 0.0 0.0 11.1 5 3709 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 35.3 0.0 71.6 0.0 0.0 0.� 6 6034 Califomia Oaks/Kalmia St 57.7 0.0 71.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 15984 Clinton Kieth Rd 160.0 0.0 68.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 7528 Baxter Rd 74.0 0.0 69.4 0.0 0.0 0. 1 9 6486 Bundy Canyon Rd 66.0 0.0 67.0 0.0 0.0 0, I 10 15204 Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr 153.3 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 O. 11 9384 Main St 93.3 0.0 68.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 6834 Central Ave 64.7 0.0 72.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 8282 Nichols Rd 79.3 0.0 71.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 15043 Lake St 145.7 0.0 70.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 19516 Indian Truck Trail 188.0 0.0 70.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 16 15031 Temescal Canyon Rd 149.7 0.0 68.5 0.0 0.0 2.7 17 12587 Weirick Rd 226.0 0.3 38.0 2.7 10.0 103. 18 6076 Cajalco Rd 101.7 0.0 40.7 0.0 3.0 30.1 19 5396 El Cerrito Rd 63.3 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 20 4560 Ontario Rd 49.0 0.0 63.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 21 8686 Magnolia Ave 90.0 0.0 65.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 22 6017 SR-91 74.3 0.0 55.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 23 7338 Hidden Valley Pkwy 173.3 3.7 28.9 14.0 59.3 114. 24 4073 2nd St 93.0 0.3 29.9 2.0 12.0 65.1 25 10276 6th St 172.3 0.7 40.7 5.0 13.0 59. 26 14006 Limonite Ave 196.7 0.3 48.6 0.0 10.7 28.0 27 16841 SR-60 173.3 0.0 66.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 28 8348 Jurupa St off ramp 143.7 0.0 39.6 0.0 0.0 53.0 Total 260237 3344.7 7.0 53.0 29.3 137.0 709.3 1-15 PM -NB- Study Stats TABLE 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP Node # 1 Length 0 RAW DATA - FLOATING Node Names SR-60 Travel Time CAR RUN # of Stop - 1-215 Avg Speed AM Time <= 0 MPH SB Time <= 10 MPH Time < 30 MP 2 5197 Eucalyptus/Eastridge Ave 55.3 0.0 64.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 5465 E. Alessandro Blvd 51.3 0.0 72.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 3462 Cactus Ave/March ARB 33.7 0.0 70.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 8324 Van Buren Blvd 80.3 0.0 70.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 , 6 9754 Oleander Ave 94.3 0.0 70.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 7430 Ramona Expy 73.7 0.0 68.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 15950 Nuevo Rd 157.0 0.0 69.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 4080 D St 42.3 0.0 65.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 4800 SR-74 West/4th St 47.3 0.0 69.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 14648 SR-74 East 147.0 0.0 67.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 3995 Ethanac Rd 41.0 0.0 66.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 10137 McCall Blvd 102.7 0.0 67.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 12250 Newport Rd 157.3 0.0 53.1 0.0 1.3 29.7 15 15863 Scott Rd 280.3 2.0 38.6 4.0 28.0 111.0 16 15832 Clinton Keith Rd 213.0 0.0 50.7 0.0 1.3 44.0 17 9812 Los Alamos Rd 98.0 0.0 68.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 6007 Murrieta Hot Springs 64.0 0.0 64.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 , 19 7102 1-215 / I-15 NB Split 79.7 0.0 60.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 160108 1818.3 2.0 60.0 4.0 30.7 184.7 1-215 AM-SB- Study Stats TABLE 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP Node # - 1 RAW Length 0 DATA - FLOATING Node Names 1-215 / 1-15 NB Split CAR Travel Time - RUN # of Stops -1-215 Avg Speed AM NB Time <= 0 MPH Time <= 10 MPH Time <- 30 MP 2 4583 - Murrieta Hot Springs 44.0 0.0 71.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 6084 Los Alamos Rd 59.3 0.0 69.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 - 9769 - Clinton Keith Rd 106.7 0.0 62.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 15884 Scott Rd 154.3 0.0 70.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 15964 Newport Rd 149.3 0.0 72.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 12046 McCall Blvd 118.7 0.0 69.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 10133 Ethanac Rd 177.3 0.7 39.0 2,3 22.0 90.0 9 4075 SR-74 East 108.3 1.3 25.6 1.7 .. 17.7 84.0 10 14689 SR-74 West/4th St 231.7 1.0 43.2 0.0 10.0 78.3 11 5548 D St 58.0 0.0 65.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 3233 Nuevo Rd 32.7 0.0 67.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 16075 Ramona Expy 153.3 0.0 71.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 7908 Oleander Ave 77.0 0.0 70.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 15 9258 Van Buren Blvd 97.0 0.0 65.1 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 16 8426 Cactus Ave/March ARB 81.3 0.0 70.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 3300 E. Alessandro Blvd 34.7 0.0 64.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 18 5401 Eucalyptus/Eastridge Ave 418.3 10.7 8.8 _ 38.7 - 277.7 411.3 19 5078 SR-60 327.3 7.0 10.6 24.0 177.0 326.7 Total 157454 2429.3 20.7 44.2 66.7 504.3 991.0 1-215 AM -NB- Study Stats TABLE 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP RAW DATA - FLOATING CAR RUN-1-2'15 PM SB Node # 1 Length 0 Node Names SR-60 Travel Time # of Stops Avg Speed Time <= 0 MPH Time <= 10 MPH Time < 30 MP 2 5288 EucalyptuslEastridge Ave 61.3 0.0 58.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 5392 E. Alessandro Blvd 53.7 0.0 68.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 4 3488 Cactus Ave/March ARB 34.7 0.0 68.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 5 8336 Van Buren Blvd 83.3 0.0 68.2 0.0 0.0 .0.0 6 9742 Oleander Ave 103.7 0.0 64.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 7345 Ramona Expy 76.3 0.0 65.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 16030 Nuevo Rd 198.3 0.0 55.1 0.0 5.3 44.7 9 4057 D St 42.0 0.0 65.9 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 10 4847 SR-74 WesV4th St 52.0 0.0 63.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 14583 SR-74 East 163.0 0.0 61.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 12 4052 Ethanac Rd 40.7 0.0 67.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 10164 McCall Blvd 103.0 0.0 67.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 12223 Newport Rd 126.0 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 15857 Scott Rd 162.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 16 15687 Clinton Keith Rd 156.7 0.0 68.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 9935 Los Alamos Rd 100.7 0.0 67.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 6061 Murrieta Hot Springs 60.7 0.0 68.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 7036 1-215 / 1-15 NB Split 70.7 0.0 67.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 160123 1688.7 0.0 64.7 0.0 5.3 46.3 1-215 PM-SB- Study Stats TABLE 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP RAW DATA - FLOATING CAR RUN - I-215 PM NB Node # 1 Length 0 Node Names 1-215 / 1-15 NB Split Travel Time # of Stops Avg Speed Time <= 0 MPH Time <= 10 MPH Time <= 30 MP 2 4589 Murrieta Hot Springs 87.3 0.3 35.8 0.0 6.0 42.0 3 6079 Los Alamos Rd 125.0 0.3 33.2 0.0 4.7 65.7 4 9780 Clinton Keith Rd 148.3 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 29.3 1 5 15886 Scott Rd 198.0 0.0 54.7 0.0 0.0 8.0 6 15968 Newport Rd 154.3 0.0 70.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 12043 McCall Blvd 120.7 0.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 10105 Ethanac Rd 155.7 0.3 44.3 1.0 7.0 66.3 9 4113 SR-74 East 41.3 0.0 67.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 14652 SR-74 West/4th St 154.3 0.0 64.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 5518 D St 59.0 0.0 63.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 3252 Nuevo Rd 33.0 0.0 67.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 16036 Ramona Expy 155.0 0.0 70.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 7945 Oleander Ave 80.0 0.0 67.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 9268 Van Buren Blvd 95.3 0.0 66.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 16 8394 Cactus Ave/March ARB 84.3 0.0 67.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 3303 E. Alessandro Blvd 32.7 0.0 68.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 5423 Eucalyptus/Eastridge Ave 70.0 0.0 52.8 0.0 3.7 14.7 19 5136 SR-60 210.3 1.7 16.6 1.0 32.3 205.3 Total 157490 2004.7 2.7 53.6 2.0 53.7 431.3 1-215 PM -NB- Study Stats TABLE 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP RAW DATA - FLOATING CAR RUN - SL Node # 1 Length 0 Node Names SR-74 Travel Time # of Stops Avg Speed Time <= 0 MPH Time <= 10 MPH Time < 30 MP 2 13056 Simpson Rd (Stop Sign) 222.0 1.3 40.1 1.7 33.3 55.3 3 3974 Domenigioni Pkwy 99.7 0.7 27.2 16.7 21.7 49.0 4 6566 Construction Rd 95.0 0.0 47.1 0.0 0.0 10.3 5 13923 Scott Rd/Washington St 204.3 0.7 46.5 0.0 6.0 34.3 6 8488 Abelia St 117.7 0.0 49.2 0.0 0.0 1.7 7 2292 Pourroy Rd 29.0 0.0 53.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 7677 Leon/Thompson 259.7 1.7 20.2 121.3 138.3 169.3 9 2943 Benton Rd 47.0 0.0 42.7 _0.0 1.0 8.3 10 4284 Auld RdNia Mira Mosa 63.7 0.3 45.9 3.0 7.7 10.7 11 2371 La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way 39.7 0.3 40.8 0.0 2.7 11.3 12 2671 Hunter Rd/Bore) Rd 61.7 0.7 29.5 10.7 17.3 29.0 13 3001 Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr 41.3 0.0 49.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 14 3022 Murrieta Hot Springs 79.3 0.7 26.0 28.0 34.0 42.3 15 1056 Winchester Square/Frontage Dr 38.3 0.3 18.8 13.7 16.3 24.0 16 986 Willows/Winchester Creek 32.3 0.3 20.8 4.3 12.7 20.0 17 3020 Nicolas Rd 46.0 0.0 44.8 0.0 0.0 3.0 18 2405 Poripaugh 45.7 0.3 35.9 0.7 3.7 13.0 19 1244 Margarita Rd 56.0 1.3 15.1 3.7 22.0 49.3 20 1204 Margarita Meadows/Promenade Mall 22.3 0.0 36.8 0.0 0.0 1.3 21 1165 Promenade Mali W. 30.0 0.3 26.5 2.0 6.0 14.0 22 1157 Ynez Rd 126.7 1.7 6.2 76.7 94.7 121.0 23 777 1-15 NB Ramps 19.0 0.0 27.9 0.0 0.0 12.7 t3726Z 1776.3 10.7 33.5 282.3 417.3 683.0 SR-79 (N) AM-SB- Study Stats TABLE 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP Node # 7 Length D RAW DATA - FLOATING Node Names 1-15 NB Ramps CAR Travel Time RUN # of Stops - SR 79 Avg Speed AM. Time <= 0 MPH NB Time <= 10 MPH Time <I- 30 MPI 2 - 850 - Ynez Rd 19.3. 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 10.3 3 408 Prominade Mall W. 8.0 0.0 34.8 0.0 0.0 3.7 4 1144 Margarita Meadows/Promenade Mall 20.3 0.0 38.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 5 1152 Margarita Rd 61.3 0.7 12.8 ' 32.0 37.7 - 47.7 6 1328 Poripaugh 33.0 0.3 27.4 0.0 3.0 18.3 7 2409 - Nicolas Rd 135.3 1.0 12.1 78.3 88.0 103.0 8 3024 - Willows/Winchester Creek 46.3 0.0 - 44.5 0.0 0.0 3.7 9 988 Winchester Square/Frontage Dr 20.0 0.0 33.7 0.0 0.0 5.7 10 1016 Murrieta Hot Springs 33.0 0.3 21.0 11.0 14.0 18.0 11 - 3061 Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr 47.0. 0.0 44.4 0.0 0.0 4.7 12 3019 Hunter Rd/Bore) Rd 54.0 0.3 38.1 0.0 3.7 17.0 13 2671 La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way 42.7 0.0 42.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 14 2411 Auld RdNia Mira Mosa 55.0 0.3 29.9 17.7 20.3 25.0 15 4217 Benton Rd 54.3 0.0 52.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 16 2936 Leon/Thompson 100.0 0.7 20.0 50.0 55.7 63.0 17 7704 Pourroy Rd 107.0 0.0 49.1 0.0 - 0.0 -5.3 18 2292 Abelia St 31.0 0.0 50.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 8512 Scott Rd/Washington St 149.0 1.3 39.0 17.0 27.3 39.3 20 13911 Construction Rd 167.0 0.0 56.8 0.0 0.0 1.7 21 6532 Domenigioni Pkwy 103.7 0.3 43.0 20.0 22.3 25.3 22 4014 Simpson Rd (Stop Sign) - 71.0 0.0 38.5 0.0 2.7 12.7 23 12998 SR-74 204.7 0.7 43.3 6.3 12.0 37.7 Total 86597 1563.0 6.0 37.8 232.3 • 286.7 443.3 SR-79 (N) AM -NB- Study Stats TABLE 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP Node fx 1 Length 0 RAW DATA - FLOATING Node Names SR-74 CAR Travel Time RUN 0 of Stops - SR 79 Avg Speed PM Time <_ 0 MPH SB Time <= 10 MPH Time < 30 MPH 2 13033 Simpson Rd (Stop Sign) 194.7 1.0 45.6 3.3 12.7 25.3 3 4007 Domenigioni Pkwy 74.7 0.3 36.6 6.7 8.7 16.3 4 6538 Construction Rd 86.7 0.0 51.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 5 13952 Scott Rd/Washington St 182.7 0.3 52.1 4.0 _ 6.7 10.3 6 8434 Abelia St 114.3 0.0 50.3 0.0 0.0 5.3 7 2283 Pourroy Rd 29.7 0.0 52.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 8 7728 Leon/Thompson 148.0 1.0 35.6 34.3. 39.3 53.7 9 2917 Benton Rd 46.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 0.0 4.7 10 4244 Auld RdAna Mira Mosa 67.0 0.3 43.2 4.7 6.3 . 12.3 11 2409 La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way 48.0 0.3 34.2 7.0 8.7 14.0 12 2655 Hunter Rd/Borel Rd 57.3 0.3 31.6 6.0 9.7 23.0 13 2975 Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr 68.3 - 0.7 29.7 10.3 16.7 27.0 14 3077 Murrieta Hot Springs 67.3 0.3 31.2 15.3 21.0 27.3 15 1016 Winchester Square/FrontageDr 23.3 0.3 29.7 0.0 2.7 13.0 16 935 Willows/WinchesterCreek 34.3 0.3 18.6 10.3 14.7 23.7 17 3080 Nicolas Rd 64.3 0.3 32.6 2.0 5.3 21.7 18 2362 Poripaugh 88.7 1.7 18.2 20.7 38.7 61.0 19 1261 Margarita Rd 109.0 2.0 7.9 48.7 76.0 105.7 I 20 1200 Margarita Meadows/Promenade Mall 31.3 0.0 26.1 0.0 1.3 24.0 21 1171 Prominade Mall W. 22.7 0.0 35.2 0.0 0.0 2.0 22 1183 Ynez Rd 86.3 1.0 9.3 39.3 58.0 75.3 23 655 1-15 NB Ramps 52.0 2.0 8.6 3.3 33.0 51.7 Total 87115 1696.7 12.3 35.0 216.0 358.3 599.3 SR-79 (N) PM-SB- Study Stats TABLE 12 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP RAW DATA - FLOAT NG CAR RUN - SR 79 PM NB Node # 1 Length 0 Node Names 1-15 NB Ramps Travel Time # of Stops Avg Speed Time <= 0 MPH Time <= 10 MPH Time <_ 30 MPH 2 833 Ynez Rd 29.3 0.3 19.4 2.3 5.7 25.0 3 1238 Prominade Mall W. 52.7 0.7 16.0 18.7 23.3 39.3 4 1155 Margarita Meadows/Promenade Mall 21.3 0.0 36.9 0.0 0.0 1.0 5 1194 Margarita Rd - 91.7 1.7 8.9 -42.0 62.3 81.0- 6 1326 Poripaugh 69.7 0.7 13.0 - - 28.3 35.3 58.3_ 7 2418 Nicolas Rd 76.0 1.3 21.7 14.3 27.3 - 47.7 8 3055 Willows/Winchester Creek 104.3 1.3 20.0 37.3 50.0 63.0 9 993 Winchester SguarelFrontage Dr 23.0 0.0 29.4 0.0 0.0 13.7 10 1025 Murrieta Hot Springs 28.3 0.3 24.7 - 0.7 4.0 18.7 11 3087 Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr 91.3 0.7 23.0 29.3 36.7 49.0 12 3054 Hunter Rd/Bore) Rd 56.7 0.3 36.7 4.3 7.0 13.0 13 2654 - La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way 39.7 0.0 45.6 0.0 0.0 4.0 14 2410 Auld RdNia Mira Mosa 36.3 0.0 45.2 0.0 0.0 3.7" 15 4247 - Benton Rd 56.7 0.0 51.1 0.0 - 0.0 2.0 16 2955 - Leon/Thompson 64.3 0.3 31.3 8.3 11.7 25.3 17 7769 Pourroy Rd 162.0 0.7 32.7 25.3 35.7 ' 62.3 .18 2321 Abelia St 27.7 0.0 - 57.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 8581 Scott Rd/Washington St 145.0 - 0.7 40.3 4.0 9.3 43.3" 20 14055 Construction Rd 201.0 0.0 47.7 0.0 - 0.3 9.3 21 6552 Domenigioni Pkwy 128.3 0.7 34.8 21.3 25.7 36.3 , 22 4071 Simpson Rd (Stop Sign) 110.0 1.0 25.2 21.0 32.0 52.7 23 13101 SR-74 206.3 0.7 43.3 2.7 -13.7 30.7 Total 88094 1821.7 11.3 33.0 260.0 380.0 79. SR-79 (N) PM -NB- Study Stats TABLE 13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP RAW Node # 1 Length 0 DATA - FLOATING Node Names SR-91 CAR Travel Time RUN # of Stops - ALESSANDRO Av Spee Time <= 0 MPH AM Time <= 10 MPH EB Time < 30 MP 2 3911 Victoria 95.7. 0.3 27.9 19.7 23.3 35.7 1 3 2338 Falkirk 44.3 0.3 36.0 0.0 3.0 8.0 4 3191 Glenhaven 55.0 0.3 39.6 0.7 3.0 6.7 5 1413 Arlington/Chicago 75.7 1.0 12.7 36.3 44.7 59.3 6 3221 Century 63.7 0.3 34.5 10.0 14.7 20.0 7 1957 Via Vista 51.3 0.7 26.0 16.7 21.0 26.7 8 3477 Overland/Canyon Crest 54.0 0.0 43.9 0.0 0.0 7.0 9 2696 Communications Ctr 37.7 0.0 48.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 , 10 1504 Trautwein 63.3 1.0 16.2 25.0 34.7 48.0 , 11 1167 K-Mart/Ralphs 19.7 0.0 40.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 , 12 675 Mission Grove 15.0 0.3 30.7 0.7 2.0 7.7 13 669 Savon/La Fitness 68.0 1.7 6.7 30.7 58.3 62.0 14 552 Northrop 57.3 1.0 6.6 23.3 50.7 52.3 15 2080 Barton 97.7 1.7 14.5 17.0 60.3 78.7 16 681 Orangecrest Club 11.0 0.0 42.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 17 5907 Sycamore/Brown 74.0 0.0 64.4 0.0 0.0 3.0 18 797 1-15 SB Ramps 12.7 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 1.0 19 793 1-15 11.3 0.0 47.7 0.0 0.0 3.0 Total 37029 907.3 8.7 27.8 180.0 315.7 421.7 Alles AM-EB- Study Stats TABLE 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP RAW Node # 1 DATA Length 0 - FLOATING Node Names 1-15 CAR Travel Time RUN # of Stops - ALESSANDRO Av Spee Time <= 0 MPH AM Time <= 10 MPH WB Time <= 30 MPH 2 768 1-15 SB Ramps 15.0 0.0 34.9 0.0 0.0 5.3 3 5970 Sycamore/Brown 79.0 0.0 51.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 671 Orangecrest Club 19.7 0.7 23.3 1.7 5.7 14.0 5 2084 Barton 63.3 1.0 22.4 18.7 25.3 37.3 6 524 Northrop 11.7 0.0 30.6 0.0 0.0 4.3 7 666 Savon/La Fitness 34.0 0.7 13.4 8.0 15.7 29.7 8 679 Mission Grove 12.7 0.0 36.5 0.0 0.0 2.0 9 1113 K-Mart/Ralphs 42.0 0.7 18.1 14.0 18.7 30.7 10 1533 Trautwein 46.3 0.7 22.6 4.0 10.3 34.7 11 2656 Communications Ctr 79.3 0.7 22.8 10.3 15.3 51.0 12 3446 Overland/Canyon Crest 132.0 2.0 17.8 27.7 57.0 98.3 13 1980 Via Vista 107.0 1.7 12.6 35.0 52.0 95.0 14 3147 Century 135.3 1.7 15.9 32.7 65.3 115.0 15 1465 Arlington/Chicago 25.3 0.0 39.4 0.0 0.0 3.3 16 3214 Glenhaven 51.7 0.3 42.4 0.0 1.7 5.0 17 2274 Falkirk 143.7 1.3 10.8 63.7 94.0 122.7 18 3937 Victoria 99.3 1.0 27.0 10.7 25.7 49.7 j 19 703 SR-91 14.7 0.0 32.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 Total 36829 1112.0 12.3 22.6 226.3 376.7 702.7 Alles AM-WB- Study Stats TABLE 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP RAW Node # 1 Length 0 DATA - FLOATING Node Names SR-91 CAR Travel Time RUN # of Stops - ALESSANDRO Avg Speed Time <= 0 MPH PM Time <= 10 MPH EB Time <= 30 MPH 2 3931 Victoria 69.3 0.0 38.7 0.0 0.0 O. 3 2318 Falkirk 40.7 0.0 38.9 0.0 0.0 2.0 4 3176 Glenhaven 219.0 5.0 9.9 37.7 158.7 192.3 5 1386 Arlington/Chicago 227.7 3.0 4.2 139.0 180.0 227.7 6 3239 Century 80.3 1.0 27.5 6.7 17.0 39.3 7 1961 Via Vista 39.7 0.0 33.7 0.0 1.3 9.7 j 8 3474 Overland/Canyon Crest 66.3 0.0 35.7 0.0 0.7 16. 9 2670 Communications Ctr 46.7 0.0 39.0 0.0 0.7 6.3 10 1512 Trautwein 37.3 0.0 27.6 0.0 2.7 20.3 11 1183 K-Mart/Ralphs 57.3 1.3 14.1 18.7 29.3 43.7 12 661 Mission Grove 37.0 0.7 12.2 15.0 21.0 28.7 13 670 Savon/La Fitness 11.7 0.0 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 14 541 Northrop 8.0 0.0 46.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 2096 Barton 28.3 0.0 50.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 16 665 Orangecrest Club 9.3 0.0 48.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 5892 Sycamore/Brown 89.3 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 18 870 1-15 SB Ramps 23.0 0.3 25.8 1.0 3.3 14.3 19 770 12.3 0.0 42.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 37015 1103.3 11.3 22.9 218.0 414.7 607.7 Alles PM-EB- Study Stats TABLE 16 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP RAW Node # 1 Length 0 DATA - FLOATING Node Names 1-15 CAR Travel Time RUN # of Stops - ALESSANDRO Av Speel Time <= 0 MPH PM Time <= 10 MPH WB Time < 30 MP 2 751 1-15 SB Ramps 36.3 0.7 14.1 14.0 18.7 29.7 i 3 5977. Sycamore/Brown 79.7 0.0 51.2 0.0 0.0 3.0 4 687 Orangecrest Club 10.3 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 2076 Barton 34.3 0.3 41.2 0.0 2.7 9.0 6 498 Northrop 9.7 0.0 35.1 0.0 0.0 2.7 7 692 Savon/La Fitness 27.7 0.7 17.1 3.7 9.0 23.3 8 622 Mission Grove 10.7 0.0 39.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 1182 K-Mart/Ralphs 17.3 0.0 46.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 1493 Trautwein 21.0 0.0 48.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 2652 Communications Ctr 37.3 0.0 48.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 3468 Overland/Canyon Crest 51.3 0.0 46.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 1971 Via Vista 28.7 0.0 46.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 3134 Century 140.3 2.3 15.2 31.7 67.0 116.3 15 1472 Arlington/Chicago 28.3 0.0 35.4 0.0 0.0 5.7 i 16 3219 Glenhaven 66.7 0.3 32.9 12.0 15.7 19.3 17 2255 Falkirk 39.0 0.0 39.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 18 3917 Victoria 102.7 1.0 26.0 17.7 29.3 50.3 j 19 831 SR-91 25.3 0.0 22.4 0.0 0.0 21.7 ' Total 36897 766.7 5.3 32.8 79.0 142.3 281.3 Alias PM-WB- Study Stats A 1 13 I C I 0 1 E I F 1 1 I J 1 FLOATING Roadway Classification Length 0 TABLE RIVERSIDE COUNTY CAR RUN RESULTS • 1.15,1.215, Segment SR-795 NB Ramp 17 CMP SR 79,-& ALESSANDRO Direction NB Peak Hour AM Speed Floating Car Count LOS 2 3 a 5 Roadway 6 1-15 Freeway 7 1-15 Freeway 7860 Rancho California Rd NB AM 68.5 C 8 1-15 Freeway 16946 Winchester Rd NB AM 70.7 B 9 1-15 Freeway 14044 1-215/1-15 split NB AM 72.8 B 10 1-15 Freeway 10208 Mumeta Hot Springs Rd NB AM 74.5 B 11 1-15 Freeway 4086 California Oaks/Kalmia St NB AM 69.7 C 12 1-15 Freeway 7373 Clinton Kieth Rd NB AM 71.8 B 13 1.15 Freeway 6021 Baxter Rd NB AM 73.8 B 14 1-15 Freeway 8631 Bundy Canyon Rd NB AM 72.1 B 15 1-15 Freeway 4628 Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr NB AM 71.1 B 16 1-15 Freeway 5420 Main St NB AM 70.3 B 17 1-15 Freeway 6086 Central Ave N13 AM 71.1 B 18 1-15 Freeway 12579 Nichols Rd NB AM 71.0 B 19 1-15 Freeway 15029 Lake St NB AM 70.8 B 20 1-15 Freeway 19641 Indian Truck Trail NB AM 71.2 B 21 1-15 Freeway 14926 Temescal Canyon Rd NB AM 52.0 22 1-15 Freeway 8316 Weirick Rd NB AM 19.8 F 23 1-15 Freeway 6821 Cajalco Rd NB AM 24.9 F 24 1-15 Freeway 9373 EI Cerrito Rd NB AM 43.0 F 25 1-15 Freeway 14997 Ontario Rd NB AM 63.2 0 26 1-15 Freeway 6603 Magnolia Ave NB AM 51.7 F 27 1-15 Freeway 7639 SR-91 NB AM 64.3 D 28 1.15 Freeway 15959 Hidden Valley Pkwy . NB AM 39.8 F 29 - 1-15 Freeway 5921 2nd St NB AM 17.1 F 30 1-15 Freeway 3999 6th St NB AM 31.6 F 31 1-15 Freeway 11042 Limonite Ave NB AM 36.9 F 32 1-15 Freeway 8686 SR-60 NB AM 53.4 E 33 34 1-15 Freeway 6294 0 Jumpa St off ramp Jurupa St off ramp NB SB AM AM 43.1 35 I 1-15 Freeway 36 1-15 Freeway 7860 SR-60 SB AM AM 50.5 70.6 B 37 1-15 Freeway 16946 Limonite Ave SB 38 1-15 Freeway 14044 6th St SB AM 67.9 D 39 I-15 Freeway 10208 2nd St SB AM 66.5 D 40 1-15 Freeway 4086 Hidden Valley Pkwy SB AM 68.6 C 41 1-15 Freeway 7373 SR-91 SB AM 68.6 C 42 1-15 Freeway 6021 Magnolia Ave SB AM 69.0 C 43 1-15 Freeway 8631 Ontario Rd SB AM 67.7 D 44. 1-15 Freeway 4628 + El Cerrito Rd SB AM 68.0 D 45 1-15 Freeway 5420 Cajalco Rd SB AM 70.5 B 46 1-15 Freeway 6086 Weirick Rd SB AM 69.1 C 47 1-15 Freeway 12579 Temescal Canyon Rd SB AM 68.9 C 48 1-15 Freeway 15029 Indian Truck Trail SB AM 68.3 C 49 1-15 Freeway 19641 Lake St SB AM 71.3 B 50 1-15 Freeway 14926 Nichols Rd SB AM 70.2 B 51 1-15 Freeway 8316 Central Ave SB AM 69.1 C 52 1-15 Freeway 6821 Main St SB AM 68.5 • C 53 1-15 Freeway 9373 Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr SB AM 67.0 D 54 1-15 Freeway 14997 Bundy Canyon Rd SB AM 69.3 C 55 1-15 Freeway 6603 Baxter Rd SB AM 73.1 B 56 1-15 Freeway 7639 Clinton Kieth Rd SB AM 70.5 B 57 1-15 Freeway 15959 California Oaks/Kalmia St SB AM 68.9 C 58 1-15 Freeway 5921 Murreta Hot Springs Rd - SB AM 69.8 C 59 1-15 Freeway 3999 1-215/1-15 split SB AM 69.7 C 60 1-15 Freeway 11042 Winchester Rd SB AM 66.7 D 61 1-15 Freeway 8686 Rancho California Rd SB AM 68.9 C 62 63 . 1-15 Freeway 6294 0 SR-796 SB Ramp SR-79S NB Ramp SB NB AM PM 60.2 t �- 64 1-15 Freeway 65 1-15 Freeway 7060 Rancho Califomia Rd NB PM 30.3 66 1-15 Freeway 8672 Winchester Rd NB PM 27.0 F E 67 1-15 Freeway 11266 1-215/1-15 split NB PM 53.6 68 1-15 Freeway 3709 Murriela Hot Springs Rd NB PM 71.6 B 69 1-15 Freeway 6034 California Oaks/Kalmia St NB PM 71.3 B 70 1-15 Freeway 15984 Clinton Kieth Rd NB PM 68.1 C 71 1-15 Freeway 7528 Baxter Rd NB PM 69.4 " C 72 1-15 Freeway 6486 Bundy Canyon Rd NB PM 67.0 D 73 1-15 Freeway 15204 Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr NB PM 67.6 D 74 1-15 Freeway 9384 Main St NB PM 68.6 C 75 1-15 Freeway 6834 Central Ave NB PM 72.1 B Page 1 of 5 A I B I C 1 D I E I F I f I J 1 TABLE 17 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP 3 FLOATING CAR RUN RESULTS-1-15,1-215, SR 79, & ALESSANDRO 4 Roadway Roadway Classification Length - Segment Direction Peak Hour Speed Floating Car 5 Count LOS 76 1-15 Freeway 8282 Nichols Rd NB PM 71.2 B 77 1-15 Freeway 15043 Lake St NB PM 70.4 B 78 1-15 Freeway 19516 Indian Truck Trail NB PM 70.8 B 79 1-15 Freeway 15031 Temescal Canyon Rd NB PM 68.5 C 80 1-15 Freeway 12587 WeirickRd NB- PM 38.0 81 1-15 Freeway 6076 Cajalco Rd NB . PM 40.7 F 82 1-15 Freeway 5396 El Cerrito Rd NB PM 58.1 E 83 1-15 Freeway 4560 Ontario Rd NB PM 63.5 D 134 1-15 Freeway 8686 Magnolia Ave NB PM 65.8 D 85 1-15 Freeway 6017 SR-91 NB PM 55.2 E 86 1-15 Freeway 7338 Hidden Valley Pkwy NB PM 28.9 87 • 1-15 Freeway 4073 2nd St NB PM 29.9 F 88 1-15 Freeway 10276 6th St NB PM 40-7 F 89 1-15 Freeway 14006 Limonite Ave NB PM 48.6 F 90 1-15 Freeway 16841 SR-60 NB PM . 66.2 D 91 1-15 hreeway 8348 Jurupa St off ramp NB PM 39.6 92 93 1-15 Freeway 0 Jumpa St off ramp SB PM 94 1-15 Freeway 7860 SR-60 SB PM .32.2 95 1-15 Freeway 16946 Limonite Ave SB PM 38.9 F 96 1.15 Freeway 14044 6th St SB PM 52.7 F 97 1.15 Freeway 10208 2nd St SB PM 57.0 E 98 1.15 Freeway 4086 Hidden Valley Pkwy SB PM 66.3 . D 99 I 1-15 • Freeway 7373 SR-91 SB PM 66.1 D 100 1 1-15 Freeway 6021 Magnolia Ave SB PM 42.2 101 ; 1-15 Freeway 8631 Ontario Rd SB PM 19.8 F 102 I 1-15 Freeway 4628 El Cerrito Rd SB PM 25.4 F 103 1 1-15 Freeway 5420 Cajalco Rd SB PM 56.9 E 104 1-15 Freeway 6086 Weirick Rd SB PM 63.8 D 105 ! 1-15 Freeway 12579 Temescal Canyon Rd SB PM 64.2 D 106 I 1-15 Freeway 15029 Indian Truck Trail SB PM 70.2 B 107 1-15 Freeway 19641 Lake St SB PM 71-0 B 108 1 1-15 Freeway - 14926 Nichols Rd SB PM 72.0 B 109 1-15 Freeway 8316 Central Ave SB PM 71-5 B 110 1-15 Freeway 6821 Main St SB PM 70.5 B 111 1-15 Freeway 9373 Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr SB PM 69.5 C 112 1-15 Freeway 14997 Bundy Canyon Rd SB PM 70.5 ' B 113 1-15 Freeway 6603 Baxter Rd SB PM 69.3 C 114 1-15 Freeway 7639 Clinton Kieth Rd SB PM 69.1 C 115 1-15 Freeway 15959 Caldomia Oaks/Kalmia St SB PM 69.5 C 116 1-15 Freeway 5921 Mumieta Hat Springs Rd SB PM 70.4 B 117 1-15 Freeway 3999 1-215/1-15 split SB PM 71.8 B 118 1.15 Freeway 11042 Winchester Rd SB PM 69.7 C 119 1-15 Freeway 8686 Rancho California Rd SB PM 70.2 B 120 1-15 Freeway 6294 SR-79S SB Ramp - PM 64.4 D 721 c w ^.. f s i,. } '� 'ss r'°4 z '•'r „u a 'ah.,'zi.an^-..; �*''x< _ " t� � t - € � - - 122 1-215 Freeway 0 1-215 / 1-15 NB Split NB AM 123 1-215 Freeway 4583 Murdeta Hot Springs NB AM 71.0 - B 124 1-215 Freeway 6084 Los Alamos Rd NB AM 69.9 C 125 1-215 Freeway 9769 Clinton Keith Rd NB AM 62.4 D 126 1-215 Freeway 15884 Scott Rd NB AM 70.2 B 127 1-215 Freeway 15964 Newport Rd NB AM 72.9 B 128 1-215 Freeway 12046 McCall Blvd NB AM 69.2 C 129 1-215 Freeway 10133 Ethanac Rd NB AM 39.0 F 130 1-215 Freeway 4075 SR-74 East NB AM 25.6 F 131 1-215 Freeway 14689 SR-74 West/4th St NB AM 43.2 F 132 1-215 Freeway 5548 D St NB AM 65.2 D 133 1-215 Freeway 3233 Nuevo Rd NB AM 67.5 C 134 1-215 Freeway 16075 Ramona Expy NB AM 71.5 B 135 1-215 Freeway 7908 Oleander Ave NB AM 70.0 B 136 1-215 Freeway 9258 Van Buren Blvd NB AM 65.1 C 137 1-215 Freeway 8426 Cactus Ave/March ARB NB AM 70.6 B 138 1-215 Freeway 3300 E. Alessandro BNd NB AM 64.9 E 139 I-215 Freeway 5401 EucalyptuslEastndgeAve NB AM 8.8 140 - 1-215 Freeway 50/8 SH-60 NB AM 10.6 F 141 Freeway 0 SR-60 SB AM�� 142 1-215 143 1-215 Freeway 5197 Eucalyptus/Eastridge Ave SB AM • 64.0 D 144 _ 1-215 Freeway 5465 E. Alessandro Blvd SB AM 72.6 B 145 1-215 Freeway 3462 Cactus Ave/March ARB SB AM 70.1 B Page 2 of 5 A I B 1 C 1 D 1 E 1 F 1 1 1 J 1 FLOATING Roadway Classification Freeway Length 8324 TABLE 17 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP CAR RUN RESULTS-1.15,1.215, SR Segment Van Buren Blvd 79, & ALESSANDRO Direction SB Peak Hour AM Speed 70.6 Floating Car Count LOS 2 3 4 5 146 Roadway 1-215 B 147 1-215 Freeway 9754 Oleander Ave SB AM 70.5 B 148 1-215 Freeway 7430 Ramona Expy SB AM 68.8 C 149 1-215 Freeway 15950 Nuevo Rd SB AM 69.3 C 150 1-215 Freeway 4080 D St SB AM 65.7 D 151 1-215 Freeway 4800 SR-74 West/4th St SB AM 69.1 C 152 1-215 Freeway 14648 SR-74 East SB AM 67.9 D 153 1-215 Freeway 3995 Ethanac Rd SB AM 66.4 D 154 1-215 Freeway 10137 McCall Blvd , SB AM 67.3 D 155 I-215 Freeway 12250 Newport Rd SB AM 53.1 156 1-215 Freeway 15863 Scott Rd SB AM 38.6 F 157 1-215 Freeway 15832 Clinton Keith Rd - SB AM 50.7 F 158 1-215 Freeway 9812 Los Alamos Rd SB AM 68.3 C 159 1-215 Freeway 6007 Murrieta Hot Springs SB AM 64.0 D 160 161 162 1-215 • 1-215 Freeway Freeway , /102 0 1-215 / 1-15 NB Split 1-215 / I-15 NB Split SB NB� AM PM 60.8 E 163 1-215 Freeway 4589 Murrieta Hot Springs NB PM 35.8 164 1-215 Freeway 6079 Los Alamos Rd NB PM 33.2 F 165 1-215 Freeway 9780 Clinton Keith Rd NB PM 45.0 F 166 1-215 Freeway 15886 Scott Rd NB PM 54.7 E 167 1-215 Freeway 15968 Newport Rd NB PM 70.5 B 168 1-215 Freeway 12043 McCall Blvd NB PM 68.0 169 1-215 Freeway 10105 Ethanac Rd NB PM 44.3 170 V215 Freeway 4113 SR-74 East NB PM 67.8 D 171 1-215 Freeway 14652 SR-74 Wes1/4th St NB PM 64.7 D 172 1-215 Freeway 5518 D St NB - PM - 63.8 D 173 1-215 Freeway 3252 - Nuevo Rd NB PM 67.2 D - 174 I-215 Freeway 16036 Ramona Expy NB PM 70.5 B 175 1-215 Freeway 7945 Oleander Ave NB PM 67.7 D 176 V215 - Freeway 9268 Van Buren Blvd NB PM 66.3 D 177 1.215 Freeway 8394 Cactus Ave/March ARB NB PM 67.9 D 178 I-215 Freeway 3303 E. Alessandro Blvd NB PM 68.9 C 179 1-215 Freeway 5423 Eucalyptus/EastridgeAve NB PM 52.8 180 181 1-215 ;:,.,,..k.�, 1 Freeway 4: rv[I "a<t.,...at Freeway 5136 wL',3;�Z':3''r➢'.x�.�`` 0 SR-60 a�-..a.�,.?_, `!-'E�,-s.a.. �,�.tn:.�'..��fi SR-60 NB �. a13 SB PM �.,.�,.... .. PM 16.6 ... x' F x'_'. 182 1-215 183 1-215 Freeway 5288 Eucayptus/Eastridge Ave SB PM 58.8 E 184 1-215 Freeway 5392 E. Alessandro Blvd SB PM 68.5 C 185 I-215 Freeway 3488 Cactus Ave/March ARB SB PM 68.6 C 186 I-215 Freeway 8336 Van Buren Blvd SB PM 68.2 C 187 I-215 Freeway 9742 Oleander Ave SB PM 64.1 D 188 1-215 Freeway 7345 Ramona Expy SB PM 65.6 D 189 1-215 Freeway 16030 Nuevo Rd SB PM 55.1 E 190 1-215 Freeway 4057 D St SB PM 65.9 a 191 1-215 Freeway 4847 SR-74 West/4th St SB PM 63.6 D 192 1-215 Freeway 14583 SR-74 East SB PM 61.0 E 193 1-215 Freeway 4052 Ethanac Rd SB PM 67.9 D 194 1-215 Freeway 10164 McCall Blvd SB PM 67.3 D 195 1-215 Freeway 12223 Newport Rd SB PM 66.1 D 196 I-215 Freeway 15857 Scott Rd SB PM 66.7 D 197 , 1-215 Freeway 15687 Clinton Keith Rd SB PM 68.3 C 198 1-215 Freeway 9935 Los Alamos Rd SB PM 67.3 D 199' 1-215 Freeway 6061 Murrieta Hot Springs SB PM 68.1 D 200 201 1-215 SR-79 Freeway Arterial /036 � 0 1-215 / 1-15 NB Split p 1-15 NB Ramps SB NB PM AM 6/.9 D 202 203 SR-79 Arterial 1016 Murrieta Hot Springs NB . AM 28.3 C 204 SR-79 Arterial 3061 Robert Trent Jones/TechnologyDr NB AM 44.4 B 205 SR-79 Arterial 3019 Hunter Rd/Borel Rd NB AM 38.1 B 208 SR-79 Arterial 2671. La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way NB AM ' 42.7 B 207 SR-79 Arterial 2411 Auld Rya Mira Masa NB AM 29.9 C 208 SR-79 Arterial 4217 Benton Rd NB AM 52.9 B 209 SR-79 Arterial 2936 LeonlThompson NB AM 20.0 E 210 SR-79 Arterial 7704 Pounoy Rd NB AM 49.1 B 211 SR-79 Arterial 2292 Abefia St NB AM 50.4 B 212 SR-79 Arterial 8512 Scott Rd/Washinglan St NB AM 39.0 B 213 SR-79 Arterial 13911 Construction Rd NB AM 56.8 B 214 SR-79 Arterial 6532 Domenigioni Pkwy NB AM 43.0 B 215 51449 Arterial 4014 Simpson Rd (Stop Sign) NB AM 38.5 B Page 3 of 5 A I B J C I D I E I F I 1 I J 1 FLOATING Roadway Classification Length TABLE 17 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP CAR RUN RESULTS-1.15,1.215, SR Segment SR-74 SR-74 79, & ALESSANDRO Direction NB SB� Peak Hour AM Speed 43.3 Floating Ca Count LOS B 2 3 4 5 216 217 218 Roadway SR-79 SR79 Arterial Arterial 12998 0 AM 219 SR-79 Arterial 13056 Simpson Rd (Stop Sign) SB AM 40.1 B 220 SR-79 Arterial 3974 Domenigioni Pkwy - SB AM 27.2 D 221 SR-79 Arterial 6566 Construction Rd SB AM 47.1 8 222 SR-79 Arterial 13923 Scott RdNVashington St SB AM 46.5 B 223 SR-79 Arterial 8488 Abelia St SB AM 49.2 B 224 SR-79 Arterial 2292 Pourroy Rd SB AM 53.9 B 225 SR-79 , Arterial 7677 Leon/Thompson SB AM. 202 ' E 226 SR-79 Arterial 2943 Benton Rd SB AM 42.7 B 227 SR-79 Arterial 4284 Auld RdNia Mira Mosa SB AM 45.9 B 228 , SR-79 Arterial 2371 La Alba Rd/Spar rman Way SB AM 40.8 B 229 ! SR-79 Arterial 2671 Hunter Rd/Borel Rd SB AM 29.5 C 230 I SR-79 Arterial 3001 Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr SB AM 49.5 B 231 I SR-79 Arterial 3022 Murrieta Hot Springs SB AM 26.0 D 232 233"'` 234 I SR79 SR-79 Arterial Arterial /7/ 0 1-15 NB Ramps 1-15 NB Ramps SB NB AM PM 25.8 D 235 SR-79 Arterial 1025 Munieta Hot Springs NB PM 21.1 E 2361, SR-79 Arterial 3087 Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr NB PM 23.0 0 237 I SR-79 Arterial 3054 Hunter Rd/Borel Rd NB PM 36.7 B 238 I SR-79 Arterial 2654 La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way NB PM 45.6 B 239 I SR-79 Arterial 2410 Auld Rd/Via Mira Mosa NB PM 45.2 B 240 ! SR-79 Arterial 4247 Benton Rd NB PM 51.1 B 241 1 SR-79 Arterial 2955 Leon/Thompson NB PM 31.3 C 242 , SR-79 Arterial 7769 Pourroy Rd NB PM 32.7 C 243 1 SR-79 Arterial 2321 Abelia St NB PM 57.2 B 244 I SR-79 Arterial 8581 Scott Rd/VVashington St NB PM 40.3 B 245 I SR-79 Arterial 14055 Construction Rd NB PM 47.7 B 246 ' SR-79 Arterial 6552 Domenigioni Pkwy NB PM 34.8 C 247 SR-79 Arterial 4071 Simpson Rd (Stop Sign) NB PM 25.2 D 248 249 250 Sk- SR-79 rn1 Arterial 0 SR-74 SR-74 NB SB PM PM 43.3 B 251 SR-79 Arterial 13033 Simpson Rd (Stop Sign) - SB PM 45.6 B 252 , SR-79 Arterial 4007 Domenigioni Pkwy SB PM 36.6 • B 253 SR-79 Arterial 6538 Construction Rd SB PM 51.4 B 254 SR-79 Arterial 13952. Scott RdNVashington St SB PM 52.1 B 255 SR-79 Arterial 8434 Abelia St SB PM 50.3 B 256 SR-79 Arterial 2283 Pourroy Rd SB PM 52.5 B 257 SR-79 Arterial 7728 Leon/Thompson SB PM 35.6 B 258 SR-79 • Arterial 2917 Benton Rd SB PM 43.2 B 259 SR-79 Arterial 4244 Auld Rd/Va Mira Mosa SB PM 43.2 B 260 SR-79 Arterial 2409 La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way SB PM 34.2 C 261 SR-79 Arterial 2655 Hunter Rd/Borel Rd SB PM 31.6 C 262 SR-79 Arterial 2975 Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr SB PM 29.7 C 263 SR-79 Arterial 3077 Mumeta Hot Springs SB PM 31.2 C 264 285 a 266 SKl9 `^:- Alessandro Artenal z :`�.�:_ r 4.� .,.,...•. Arterial 655 �. c.' "�&a�3.� 0 1-15 NB Ramps �? s°'m�_:`�_ ._d; � ��* "';.�,�-4 ..�i.� �,'�� SB ._. + ��'a_ EB PM _.� .-'_-..� _ AM 20.6 ?:.5 ?- ' ,- E ,. '. SR-91 267 Alessandro Arterial 3911 Victoria EB AM 27.9 D 268 Alessandro Arterial 2338 Falkirk EB AM 36.0 8 269 Alessandro Arterial 3191 Glenhaven EB AM 39.6 B 270 Alessandro Arterial 1413 - Ariington/Chicago - EB AM 12.7- F 271 Alessandro Arterial 3221 Century EB AM 34.5 C 272 Alessandro Arterial 1957 Via Vista EB AM 26.0 D 273 Alessandro Arterial 3477 Overland/Canyon Crest EB AM . 43.9 8 274 Alessandro Arterial 2696 Communications Ctt EB AM 48.8 8 275 Alessandro Arterial 1504 Traulwein EB AM 16.2 F 276 Alessandro Arterial 1167 K-Mart/Ralphs EB AM 40.5 B 277 Alessandro Arterial 675 Mission Grove EB AM 303 C 278 Alessandro 279 280 281 282 283 Alessandro Alessandro Alessandro Alessandro Alessandro 284 Alessandro 285 rted Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Artenal 552 2080 681 5907 797 793 Savon/La Fitness Northrop Barton Orangecrest Club Sycamore/Brown 1-215 SB Ramps 1-215 Page 4 0f 5 EB EB EB EB EB EB AM AM AM AM AM AM AM 6.7 6.6 14.5 42.2 54.4 42.9 47.7 B B A 1 B I C I D 1 E 1 F 1 I I J 1 TABLE 17 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP 3 FLOATING CAR RUN RESULTS-1.15,1-215, SR 79, & ALESSANDRO 4 Roadway Roadway Classificatio Length Segment Direction Peak Hour Speed Floating Car 5 - Count LOS 286 Alessandro Arterial 0 1-215 WB AM 287 Alessandro Arterial 768 1-215 SB Ramps WB AM 34.9 C 288 Alessandro Arterial 5970 Sycamore/Brown WB AM 51.5 B 289 Alessandro Arterial 671 Orangecresl Club WB AM 23.3 D 290 Alessandro Arterial 2084 Barton WB AM 22.4 D 291 Alessandro Arterial 524 Northrop WB AM 30.6 C 292 Alessandro Arterial 666 SavonlLa Fitness WB AM 13.4 F 293 Alessandro Arterial 679 Mission Grove WB AM 36.5 B 294 Alessandro Arterial 1113 K-MartlRalphs - WB AM 18.1 E 295 Alessandro Arterial 1533 Trautwein WB AM 22.6 D 296 Alessandro Arterial 2656 Communications Ctr WB AM 22.8 D 297 ' Alessandro Arterial 3445 Overland/Canyon Crest WB AM 17.8 E 298 Alessandro Arterial 1980 Via Vista WB AM 12.6 299 Alessandro Arterial 3147 Century WB AM 15.9 F 300 Alessandro Arterial 1465 ArtingtonlChicago WB AM 39.4 B 301 Alessandro Arterial 3214 Glehhaven WB AM 42.4 B 302 Alessandro Arterial - 2274 Falkirk WB AM 10.8 F 303 Alessandro Arterial 3937 Victoria WB AM 27.0 D 304 Alessandro Artenal 703 SR-91 WB AM 32.7 C 305 305 Alessandro Arterial 0 SR-91 EB PM 307 Alessandro Arterial 3931 Victoria EB PM 38.7 B 308 Alessandro Arterial 2318 Falkirk EB PM 38.9 B 309 Alessandro Arterial 3176 Glenhaven EB PM 9.9 F 310 Alessandro Arterial 1386 Arlington/Chicago EB PM 4.2 F 311 Alessandro Arterial 3239 Century EB PM 27.5 D 312 Alessandro Arterial 1961 Via Vista EB PM 33.7 C 313 Alessandro Arterial 3474 Overland/Canyon Crest EB PM 35.7 B 314 I Alessandro Arterial 2670 Communications Ctr EB PM 39.0 B 315 Alessandro Arterial 1512 Trauhnwein EB - PM 27.6 D 316 Alessandro Arterial 1183 K-MarflRalphs EB PM 14.1 317 Alessandro Arterial 661 Mission Grove EB PM 12.2 F 318 Alessandro Arterial 670 SavonlLa Fitness EB PM 39.2 B 319 Alessandro Arterial 541 Northrop EB PM 46.1 B 320 , Alessandro Arterial 2096 Barton EB PM 50.4 B 321 Alessandro Arterial 665 Orangecrest Club EB PM 48.6 B 322 Alessandro Arterial 5892 Sycamore/Brown EB PM 45.0 B 323 Alessandro Arterial 870 1-215 SB Ramps EB PM 25.8 D 324 Alessandro Artenal 770 1-215 tFi PM 42.6 B 325 _ ., :.". .-, ," ?..,".:,s.:;7a,a't+,:�`t3�:a.ir1Y,.-'^r<rta",�`, -ss :a; »¢�wa �.�'=s `,,.,, .:; r...iM *'v'9,e•i...,,s: ., ....a... .._ ... .. ,.. ;"�-' 326 Alessandro Arterial 0 I-215 WB PM 327 Alessandro Arterial 751 1-215 SB Ramps WB PM 14.1 328 Alessandro Arterial 5977 Sycamore/Brown WB PM 51.2 B 329 Alessandro Arterial 687 Orangecrest Club WB PM 45.3 B 330 Alessandro Arterial 2076 Barton WB PM 41.2 B 331 Alessandro Arterial 498 Northrop WB PM 35.1 B 332 Alessandro Arterial 692 SavonlLa Fitness WB PM 17.1 E 333 Alessandro Arterial 622 kission Grove WB PM 39.8 B 334 Alessandro Arterial 1182 K-MartlRalphs WB PM 46.5 B 335 Alessandro Arterial 1493 Trautwein WB PM 48.5 B 336 Alessandro Arterial 2652 Communications Clr WB PM 48A B 337 ' Alessandro Arterial 3468 Overland/Canyon Crest WB PM 46.1 B 338 Alessandro Arterial 1971 Ira Vista WB PM 46.9 B 339 Alessandro Arterial 3134 Century WB PM 15.2 340 Alessandro Arterial 1472 Arlington/Chicago WB PM 35.4 B 341 Alessandro Arterial 3219 Glenhaven WB PM 32.9 C 342 Alessandro Arterial 2255 Falkirk WB PM 39.4 B 343 Alessandro - Arterial 3917 Victoria WB PM . 26.0 D 344 Alessandro Artenal 831 SR-91 WB PM 22.4 D 345 346 Borderline Areas 347 F Deficient Areas Page 5 of 5 TABLE 18 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP FLOATING CAR RUN LOS DEFICIENCY RESULTS Selected Segments of 1-15N-2151SR 79/Alessandro oadway 1.15 1-215 Segment Deficient Per Floating Car Runs(YIN) Overriding . Considerations (YIN) Reason for Overriding Considerations Alessandro to SR 74 SR 74 West to I-15 N Y N SR 79 Alessandro 1-15 to SR 74 N (1) (1) Combine segments from 1-15 to Murrieta Hot Springs Road to achieve this result • AGENDA ITEM 10 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 10. • AGENDA ITEM 11 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 11. • AGENDA ITEM 12 • • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: March 20, 2006 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager SUBJECT: FY 05/06 Obligation Delivery Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the TAC to: 1) Review and update the FY 05/06 Obligation Plan if applicable. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Obligation Plans were submitted by each county throughout the state so that Caltrans and the California Transportation Commission can anticipate the amount of funding (Obligational Authority (OA)) needed and the volume of obligations per quarter. The attached FY 05/06 Obligation Plan was submitted to Caltrans Local Assistance in November 2005. It reflects those projects that will be obligated during the 05/06 fiscal year. The Obligation Plan was included in the January TAC meeting agenda and is being distributed again so that local agencies can provide updates to the plan. Please notify RCTC if any changes need to be made. We also need to verify that those projects planned for obligation in the first quarter and second quarters (ending December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006, respectively) were actually obligated. Agencies that identified their projects for obligation in the third quarter should be submitting their obligation package within the next 90 days. a a a, u » C i c 21 7,41f, 3 E,� s V^ « '8EV__486°4 »«»« 8 « 8 » 8'- 4§4 »»« a s g G m g__ s 5, . m n MM x 6, g �_n m,-8po a ^ M »» yy w»»8»»»«««««» ESLm88 »»... »»»»» g g R"4,s,, »««««»««»»» - iv ... agg »»..., ry= «.a»«»nnnn« E;�8__n�8' «»««»«»»»» -� ,3 a_nan..n_nnn.nn_nnmm»n von __. v.. na m NN3 9 ai F a S AA pp ii�, III iiaa 7 1 a ill III 8. so[[¢w 5 I!.1 ¢ P ¢ KKK J. ¢¢¢¢ I ¢¢¢ ¢ 11¢ 85 hi a °� Li » ' 9 ppWdW �.9.iA id to 2Q3� ¢x Ar 6 � avi< a R9 P3j 1 ..aN 3$3$�S�$yyjRRc y C 60,1%C�Oil. K £[�wa�C0Y(3axjE f, 11:, d 222 , ii Elo it �p$�6fN99<EE ;NQ q r. �s °,2 �N n S£ 00 g. ¢ ^ $ -A A88 pp5 M ¢x�a� SBP.,r ''$3g��g�§�a�aaa'aa� �fl a�'_'9p�p 88 C.p«p 2 �_ 8� L� a g 1 a A s § j 2 F a, s en g e g' `��il Ir 5. 6 °u__n �a$� { " tl yy 4'�d Pi�@i�zuzggz �L L g$g$ a£ns¢¢cc £ ' g �uil 8 1 AgUap� €g 2 .. yg�i ,34i9110.0.44 % yy38a @ *ppE90 5�05$f� 8 8 3 g3 33y30 8J b dwm .. €€ .2 ggpp g 3u¢ - S,3 9 n n °P.Kk�kKK° g RCo ME° uu¢�°¢GuK 1 2 � uu° uoF �uuu ¢C¢ °° °_ ° 5 u¢ ¢ a 5 a f--G 11 j 666„6,W666 qj o666666 rS 66o�o6606oM666 qgqu 1151 g 6 6 66 88888888888 88888888888888888888888888888 888 888 88 • AGENDA ITEM 13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 20, 2006 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager SUBJECT: TE Project Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the TAC to: 1) Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Based on the information received on project schedules last month, the following table has been updated to reflect 1) the approved TE funds, local match and Total Project Cost; 2) the TE project programming; 3) TE eligibility determination dates; and 4) the TE STIP targets vs. TE programming. As previously reported, the TE funds are programmed in the STIP as a lump sum. Once projects are ready for allocation we will program them in the STIP individually and allocate at the same time. As you will note, we have $5.2 M of programming in fiscal year 2005/06 and $5.7 M as our target for that year. We can move these funds to fiscal year 2006/07 to prevent from losing the funds. We also ask those agencies that will request project allocations in fiscal year 2006/07 to closely review their schedules. Projects that do not request their allocation in the program year can lose the funds. Therefore, if a project is scheduled for allocation of construction funds, all prior phases must be completed and approved. As a reminder, it takes approximately six weeks to process STIP amendments and allocations. • TE PROGRAMMING Agency Project TE Funds Local Match (000's) Total Project Cost Riverside Co Santa Ana River Bike Tr $ 1,416 $ 3,868 $ 5,284 Perris Perris Gateway $ 425 $ 1,325 $ 1,750 Beaumont Historic San Timoteo Bike a& Ped $ 1,416 $ 1,187 $ 2,603 Corona Downtown Enh & Beautification $ 1,416 $ 5,484 $ 6,900 Moreno Valley Sunnymead Blvd Median Enh $ 1,416 $ 2,674 $ 4,090 Corona E Sixth Street $ 1,416 $ 1,584 $ 3,000 Palm Desert Monterey Avll-10 on/off ramps $ 378 $ 422 $ 800 Riverside Alessandro Median landscaping $ 944 $ 1,056 $ 2,000 Riverside SR60/Market IC landscaping $ 472 $ 528 $ 1,000 RTA Perris Multi -modal Transit Center $ 1,352 $ 3,914 $ 5,266 Temecula Winchester Rd/SR79 $ 1,133 $ 1,252 $ 2,385 Palm Desert Monterey Av/Dinah Shore landsc. $ 567 $ 633 $ 1,200 RCTC Greenway Corridor, Perris Val line $ 1,113 $ 1,245 $ 2,358 San Jacinto Francisco Estudillo Heritage Enh $ 472 $ 178 $ 650 La Quinta Jefferson St Beautification $ 445 $ 199 $ 644 Cathedral City Cath Cyn Dr/Terrace Bike & Ped $ 445 $ 152 $ 597 Indio Hwy 111 Enhancements $ 1,416 $ 684 $ 2,100 Palm Springs Gene Autry Gateway landscap. $ 1,375 $ 845 $ 2,220 $ 17,617 $ 27,230 $ 44,847 Old TEA 21: Hemet Calimesa Norco Cath City SAFETEA LU and Old TEA 21 TE Targets: TE STIP PROGRAMMING Con Start Eligibility App Date FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 1416 pending 425 Jun-07 pending pending pending 1416 1416 Jun-07 1/24/2006 1416 pending 2/15/2006 944 1/24/2006 472 Dec-06 1/24/2006 1352 Mar-07 pending 1133 1/24/2006 2/15/2006 1113 1/24/2006 472 pending 445 Feb-07 1/24/2006 445 1/24/2006 1416 1/24/2006 1375 1/24/2006 4110 5826 3904 1416 0 SAFETEA TE Totals 292 312 520 5234 5826 3904 1416 0. 5705 4091 3245 3230 2544 Prepared by medina 3/14/2006 Page 1 • • AGENDA ITEM 14 A presentation will be made but • there is no attachment to the agenda for item 14. • t • INITIAL CITY TAC MEMBER ® BANNING 99 E. Ramsey St., DUANE BURK Banning 92220-0998 Director of Public Works -· BEAUMONT ~ ~ 15501:. 6th St., JOHN WILDER /' ClY"'" Beaumont 92223 Assistant Director of Public Works ,,, BLYTHE BILL BRUNET 440 S. Main St., City Engineer Blythe 92225 Department of Public Works 1CVAG j73-710 Fred Waring Dr., iSuite 200, · ! i Palm Desert 92260 I ALLYN WAGGLE I CALIMESA I I IP. 0. Box 1190, i Calimesa 92320 I I CAL TRANS ~ 1464 W. 4th St., 6th Fl., ~ San Bernardino 92401-1400 CANYON LAKE 31516 Railroad Canyon I?-Rd., HABIB MOTLAGH Canyon Lake 92587 Contract City Engineer CATHEDRAL CITY I I 168-700 Avenida Lalo I Guerrero, I I Cathedral City 92234 BILL BAYNE I COACHELLA ELDON LEE 1515 West Sixth Street, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Coachella 92236 Department of Public Works CORONA JrJ. 815 W. 6th St. AMADQATTAN P. 0. Box940 Public Works Director . ./ Corona, 92882-3238 Public Works Department DESERT HOT SPRINGS -65-950 DAN PATNEAUDE I Pierson Blvd., Desert Assistant City Engineer I Hot Springs 92240 Engineering Department TAC~NIN MARC~O, 2006 TELEPHONE FAX E-MAIL 951-922-3130 951-922-3141 dburk@ci.banning.ca.us 951-769-8520 951-769-8526 ulcjohn1@aol.com 760-922-6612 760-922-0278 bbrunet@cityofblythe.ca.gov I ' i I I I I 1760-346-1127 I 760-340-5949 I awaggle@cvag.org I I I I 909-795-9801 1909. 795.4399 909-383-414 7 909-383-4129 I I 951-943-6504 1951-943-8416 I trilake@adelphia.net I I I I I I I I 1760-770-0360 760-202-1460 bbayne@cathedralcity.gov I 760-398-57 44 760-398-1630 elee@coachella.org 951-736-2236 951-736-2496 amadq@ci.corona.ca.us I I I I dpatneaude@ci. desert-hot-springs .ca. us i 760-329-6411 X243 760-288-0651 • ALTERNATE ALTERNATE E-MAIL Kahono Oei citybanning@hotmail.com I I Chad Aaby caaby@cityofblythe.ca.gov I I Carol Clapper cclapper@cvag.org Bill Mosby william_a_mosby@dot.ca.gov I I I Leslie Grosjean lgrosjean@cathedralcity.gov -Tony Lucero Senior Civil Engineer Department of Public Works tlucero@coachella.org r------·---~-----Ned Ibrahim I I Assistant Public Works I Director ned.ibrahim@ci.corona.ca.us __ Ryan Duarte Associate Engineer 3/2/2006 • i CITY --lHEMET 13777 Industrial Ave., i Hemet 92545 I 1NDIAN WELLS /r9' :44-950 Eldorado Dr., I Indian Wells 192210-7497 --~--·-.....L._ llNDIO 100 Civic Center Mall, Indio 92202 ~ LAQUINTA ,Calle Tampico, ~ 1P.0.8ox 1504, 78495 ] La Quinta 92253 _. I LAKE ELSINORE I 130 South Main St., I Lake Elsinore 92530 _...t.::) / 1 MORENO VALLEY CI::JTT jP.O.Box 88005, I Moreno Valley !92552-0805 !MURRIETA 126442 Beckman Court, ~ I Murrieta 92562 lNORCO ~ 12870 Clark Ave., P.O.Box 428, I Norco 92860-0428 ------PALM DESERT ~~ 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert 92260-2578 ~ALM SPRINGS 200 Tahquitz Canyon Way, I Palm Springs 92262 IPVVTA , 125 West Murphy St., I Blythe 92225 I I TAC MEMBER IMIKEGOW TIM WASSIL Public Works Director/City Engineer I Public Works Department I i I I IAMIR MODARRESSI I TIMOTHY JONASSON Public Works Director/City Engineer KENSEUMALO City Engineer TACAGNIN MARC~O, 2006 I TELEPHONE i FAX E-MAIL i ! I ! I ' 1951-765-3712 1951-765-2493 mgow@cityofhemet.org I i i i I i I I I 1760-776-0237 1760-346-0407 twassil@cityofindianwells.org I I I 1760-342-6530 760-342-6556 amir@indio.org I I 760-777-7042 760-777-7155 I tjonasson@la-quinta.org ! I I Community Development Department 951-674-3124 x244 951-674-2392 I kseumalo@lake-elsinore.org !CRAIG NEUSTAEDTER I !Transportation Manager/ City Traffic Engineer 951-413-3140 951-413-3158 craign@moval.org JIM KINLEY I Director of Public Works/City Engineer 951-461-6077 951-698-4509 jkinley@murrieta.org BILL THOMPSON I Director of Public Works 951-270-5607 951-270-5622 bthompson@ci.norco.ca.us I MARK GREENWOOD I Director of Public works 760-776-6450 760-341-7098 mgreenwood@ci.palm-desert.ca.us -DAVE BARAKIAN Director of Public Works/ City Engineer 760-323-8253 760-322-8325 DaveB@ci.palm-springs.ca.us LES NELSON 760-922-6161 760-922-4938 lnelson@cityofblythe.ca.gov • I ALTERNATE I ALTERNATE E-MAIL I I I I I I I Linda Nixon I --I I I I I I I Bondie Baker I I Assistant Engineer II I bbaker@cityofindianwells.org I I I I I I I Jim Smith lismith@in_~O.O!~----______ I I I I I Ed Basubas Senior Civil Engineer ebasubas@lake-elsinore.org --Russ Napier Capital Improvement Program Manager rnapier@murrieta.org Lori Askew Associate Engineer Laskew@ci.norco.ca.us ---~ I I I I Ryan Gayler/Ph;! Joy 1-. _ Marcus Fuller --~---3/2/2006 I • 1 RANCHO MIRAGE i 69-825 Highway 111, BRUCE HARRY I Rancho Mirage 92270 Director of Public Works ~y TACAQNIN MARC~O, 2006 Randy Viegas Project Manager • randyv@ci.rancho-mirage.ca.us I RIVERSIDE TOM BOYD ~ 113~00 ~ain St., D~puty ~ublic Works Director/ . . . , 1R1vers1de 92522 City Engineer 1951-826-5575 1951-826-5542 ITRnyrl@rivArsirlAr.;:innv 1::i1oonan roster lstnstArrmnvArs1rlAr.;:i nnv Siobhan Foster I GEORGE JOHNSON I RIVERSIDE COUNTY Director of Transportation I I j Juan Perez 4080 Lemon St., Transportation and Land Management I Deputy Director of 1 Riverside 92501 Agency 951-955-6740 1951-955-3198 I GJohnson@rctlma.org !Transportation Jig?_erez@co.riverside.ca.us i JUAN PEREZ ! : I I I IVERSIDE COUNTY Deputy Director of Transportation I 1 I I George Johnson i 14?80 ~emon St., Transportation and Land Management j i j IDirectorof. i : R1vers1de 92501 Agency :951-955-6740 ]951-955-3198 ljcperez@co.riverside.ca.us 1Transportat1on iGJohnson@rctlma.org '-----·--------rsAN JACINTO . I I I . 1/,.. 1201 E. Main St., HABIB MOTLAGH I : I __ _I_ I San Jacinto 92583 Contract City Engineer 951-943-6504 1951-943-8416 trilake@adelphia.net lsuN LINE 1 j ! 32-505 Harry Oliver I I I j~il, Thousand Palms j EUNICE LOVI 276 1Director of Planning 1760-343-3456 x119 1760-343-3845 ~ 1TEMECULA I BILL HUGHES ~~\ 143200 Business Park I Director of Public Works/City Engineer fW Dr., Temecula 92590 Public Works Department 1951-694-6411 WRCOG 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside 92501 RUTHANNE TAYLOR-BERGER I 1951-955-8304 951-694-6475 1951-787-7991 elovi@sunline.org bill.hughes@cityoftemecula.org berger@wrcog.cog.ca.us Ron Parks Deputy Public Works Director 3/2/2006