HomeMy Public PortalAbout03 March 20, 2006 Technical Advisory Committee76184
•
•
•
TIME:
DATE:
LOCATION:
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
MEETING AGENDA*
10:00 A.M.
March 20, 2006
Records
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Regional Complex
4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA
Conference Room A, 3' Floor
*By request, agenda and minutes may be available in alternative format; i.e. large print, tape.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
RTA
Ahmad Ansari, City of Perris
Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs
Bill Bayne, City of Cathedral City
Tom Boyd, City of Riverside
Bill Brunet, City of Blythe
Duane Burk, City of Banning
City of Calimesa
Mike Gow, City of Hemet
Mark Greenwood, City of Palm Desert
Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage
Bill Hughes, City of Temecula
George Johnson, County bf Riverside
Tim Jonasson, City of LaQuinta
Jim Kinley, City of Murrieta
Eldon Lee, City of Coachella
Caltrans District 8
Eunice Lovi, SunLine Transit
Amir Modarressi, City of Indio
Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake,
(Perris) and San Jacinto
Les Nelson, PVVTA
Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley
Dan Patneaude, City of Desert Hot Springs
Juan Perez, County of Riverside
Amad Qattan, City of Corona
Ken Seumalo, City of Lake Elsinore
Ruthanne Taylor Berger, WRCOG
Bill Thompson, City of Norco
Allyn Waggle, CVAG
Tim Wassil, City of Indian Wells
John Wilder, City of Beaumont
Anne Mayer, Programming/Administration Director
11.36.02
"
"
; R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
T E C H N I C A L A D V I S O R Y C O M M I T T E E M E E T I N G A G E N D A *
* A c t i o n s m a y b e t a k e n o n a n y i t e m l i s t e d o n t h e a g e n d a .
T I M E : 1 0 : 0 0 A . M .
D A T E : M a r c h 2 0 , 2 0 0 6
L O C A T I O N : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y R e g i o n a l C o m p l e x
4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , R i v e r s i d e , C A
C o n f e r e n c e R o o m A , 3 r d F l o o r
I n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e A m e r i c a n s w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s A c t a n d g o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 5 4 9 5 4 . 2 , i f
y o u n e e d s p e c i a l a s s i s t a n c e t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n a C o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g , p l e a s e c o n t a c t R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n a t ( 9 5 1 1 7 8 7 - 7 1 4 1 . N o t i f i c a t i o n o f a t l e a s t 4 8 h o u r s p r i o r t o m e e t i n g
t i m e w i l l a s s i s t s t a f f i n a s s u r i n g t h a t r e a s o n a b l e a r r a n g e m e n t s c a n b e m a d e t o p r o v i d e a c c e s s i b i l i t y
a t t h e m e e t i n g .
1 . C A L L T O O R D E R
2 . S E L F - I N T R O D U C T I O N
3 . A P P R O V A L O F M I N U T E S F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 0 6
4 . P U B L I C C O M M E N T S ( T h i s i s f o r c o m m e n t s o n i t e m s n o t l i s t e d o n a g e n d a .
C o m m e n t s r e l a t i n g t o a n i t e m o n t h e a g e n d a w i l l b e t a k e n w h e n t h e i t e m i s
b e f o r e t h e C o m m i t t e e . )
G R A D E S E P A R A T I O N C A L L F O R P R O J E C T S F U N D I N G
R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S
6 . R A I L R O A D C R O S S I N G U P D A T E
7 . P R O J E C T D E L I V E R Y A S S I S T A N C E
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
• March 20, 2006
Page 2
8. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MSHCP
9. 2006 CMP UPDATE (Attachment)
10. STIP UPDATE
11. FTIP UPDATE
12. FY 05/06 OBLIGATION DELIVERY PLAN (Attachment)
i
13. TE UPDATE (Attachment)
14. MARCH 8, 2006 COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS
15. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
16. ADJOURNMENT (The next meeting will be April 17, 2006, 10:00 A.M. in
Banning.)
•
" M I N U T E S
"
"
T E C H N I C A L A D V I S O R Y C O M M I T T E E M E E T I N G
M I N U T E S
M o n d a y , F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 0 6
1 . C a l l t o O r d e r
T h e m e e t i n g o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ( R C T C )
T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e ( T A C ) w a s c a l l e d t o o r d e r a t 1 0 : 0 0 A . M . , a t
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n , 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , R i v e r s i d e ,
C A .
2 . S e l f - I n t r o d u c t i o n s
M e m b e r s P r e s e n t :
O t h e r s P r e s e n t :
D a v e B a r a k i a n , C i t y o f P a l m S p r i n g s
B i l l B a y n e , C i t y o f C a t h e d r a l C i t y
T o m B o y d , C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
B i l l B r u n e t , C i t y o f B l y t h e
D u a n e B u r k , C i t y o f B a n n i n g
M a r k G r e e n w o o d , C i t y o f P a l m D e s e r t
B r u c e H a r r y , C i t y o f R a n c h o M i r a g e
J u l e e H e c k e r m a n n , C i t y o f H e m e t
B i l l H u g h e s , C i t y o f T e m e c u l a
T i m J o n a s s o n , C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a
E l d o n L e e , C i t y o f C o a c h e l l a
E u n i c e L o v i , S u n L i n e
A m i r M o d a r r e s s i , C i t y o f I n d i o
R u s s N a p i e r , C i t y o f M u r r i e t a
C r a i g N e u s t a e d t e r , C i t y o f M o r e n o V a l l e y
D a n P a t n e a u d e , C i t y o f D e s e r t H o t S p r i n g s
J u a n P e r e z , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
E v i t a P r e m d a s , C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t 8
A m a d Q a t t a n , C i t y o f C o r o n a
T i m W a s s i l , C i t y o f I n d i a n W e l l s
S h i r l e y G o o d i n g , R C T C
K e n L o b e c k , R C T C
A n n e M a y e r , R C T C
S h i r l e y M e d i n a , R C T C
3 . A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s
N o o b j e c t i o n s .
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
February 6, 2006
Page 2
4. Public Comments
There were no public comments.
5. 2006 STIP SUBMITTAL
• TE PROJECT PROGRAMMING
Shirley Medina, RCTC, briefly reviewed the 2006 STIP Submittal Summary
project listing that was sent to the California Transportation Commission
(CTC) on January 30. She highlighted that the TEA reserve is still being kept
as reserve. There will be an amendment to the STIP when projects are ready
to allocate. There is $5.7 Million available for 2006/07. The projects that
are ready to go forward will be on a first come, first served basis.
Ms. Medina further stated that 11 projects have been approved as eligible for
TE programming by Ca!trans Headquarters. They are Moreno Valley, La
Quinta, Palm Springs, city of Riverside, Cathedral City, Temecula, Indio and
Corona. The others are still in the review process.
January 23, 2006 RCTC Special Meeting
Anne Mayer, RCTC, reported that a special RCTC Commission meeting was
held on January 23 because bids were opened for the Route 60 HOV project
between 1-15 and Valley Way in Mira Loma and were well over what had
been allocated for the project. About $42.5 Million was allocated to the
project and the low bid was $55 Million. She pointed out that due to the
shortfall, staff proposed to the Commission that RCTC loan the state $12.6
Million to be able to keep the project moving. The funds will come from
RCTC's unprogrammed reserve meaning that the STIP proposal that was
approved at the January Commission meeting will have to be adjusted and
the total western county reserve will be reduced by $12.6 Million.
Funding for the 91 /Green River project, which was a 100% state funded
project, is ready to list and it is expected that when bids are opened it will
have an increase; therefore, RCTC has agreed to use commercial paper funds
to fund the shortfall to keep the project moving. The 91 /Green River project
is essential for the Route 91 widening. Payback is expected in the 2008
STIP.
"
T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e M e e t i n g
F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 0 6
P a g e 3
6 . T A C S U B C O M M I T T E E R E P O R T O N P R O J E C T D E L I V E R Y I S S U E S
S h i r l e y M e d i n a p r o v i d e d a S u m m a r y P r o j e c t D e l i v e r y S u b c o m m i t t e e M e e t i n g
r e p o r t f r o m t h e J a n u a r y 3 1 , 2 0 0 6 m e e t i n g a n d s t a t e d t h a t p r o g r e s s i s b e i n g
m a d e o n C a l t r a n s ' p r o j e c t t r a c k i n g d a t a b a s e w i t h i n t e r n e t a c c e s s . T h e s t a f f
r e t e n t i o n i s s u e a t C a l t r a n s ' L o c a l A s s i s t a n c e i s b e i n g r e v i e w e d t o r e s t r u c t u r e
a n d e l e v a t e s o m e o f t h e p o s i t i o n s t o p r o v i d e q u a l i t y s t a f f i n g . A l s o , t h e S e l f -
h e l p c o u n t i e s d e v e l o p e d a n e x e c u t i v e p a r t n e r s h i p s o t h a t c e r t a i n i s s u e s t h a t
a r e c o m i n g u p s t a t e w i d e c o n c e r n i n g p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y c a n b e a d d r e s s e d . I t
w i l l c o n s i s t o f t h e r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f u n d i n g a g e n c i e s a n d C a l t r a n s .
E v i t a P r e m d a s , C a l t r a n s L o c a l A s s i s t a n c e , s t a t e d t h a t f o l l o w i n g t h e m e e t i n g ,
s h e w i l l d i s t r i b u t e t o e a c h c i t y a f o l d e r o f a c o p y o f t h e d a t a b a s e o f a l l
p r o j e c t s w i t h d e t a i l , i n c l u d i n g p r o j e c t i n i t i a t i o n d o c u m e n t s . S h e e n c o u r a g e d
c a r e f u l s c r u t i n y o f t h e i n f o r m a t i o n s o t h a t t h e d a t a b a s e c a n b e u p d a t e d . S h e
c o u l d n o t i n d i c a t e a t i m e l i n e f o r t h e d a t a b a s e t o b e a v a i l a b l e o n t h e i n t e r n e t .
S h e f u r t h e r s t a t e d t h a t u n t i l i t i s a v a i l a b l e o n t h e i n t e r n e t , s h e w i l l p r o v i d e
t h e i n f o r m a t i o n a t e a c h T A C m e e t i n g . S h e r e q u e s t e d t h a t c o m m e n t s b e
s u b m i t t e d t o h e r p r i o r t o e a c h T A C m e e t i n g s o t h a t t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c a n b e
u p d a t e d .
T h e T A C m e m b e r s v o i c e d t h e i r c o n c e r n s a n d t h e r e w a s l e n g t h y d i s c u s s i o n
r e g a r d i n g p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y . I n r e s p o n s e t o a q u e r y r e g a r d i n g A n n e M a y e r ' s
r e c o m m e n d a t i o n t o g e t a c t i o n o n i t e m s , s h e s u g g e s t e d t h a t w h e n c a l l i n g
C a l t r a n s f o r t h e s t a t u s o f p r o j e c t s , t h e a g e n c i e s s h o u l d k n o w t h e p r o j e c t s ,
w h e r e t h e y a r e , w h a t t h e a c t i o n i t e m s a r e , w h a t t h e s t a t u s i s a n d L o c a l
A s s i s t a n c e w i l l r e v i e w t h e p r o j e c t s w i t h e a c h a g e n c y . S h e f u r t h e r
r e c o m m e n d e d n o t a l l o w i n g p r o j e c t s t o s i t f o r e x t e n d e d p e r i o d s o f t i m e
w i t h o u t a d e c i s i o n . S o m e t i m e s t e l e p h o n i n g a s e n i o r o r d e p u t y w i l l b e
n e c e s s a r y .
M s . P r e m d a s s t a t e d t h a t s h e w i l l s u g g e s t t o B i l l M o s b y , C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t 8 ,
t h a t i f t h e r e a r e a n y i s s u e s o r c o m p l a i n t s r e g a r d i n g p r o j e c t s , L o c a l
A s s i s t a n c e e n g i n e e r s d o f o l l o w u p s t o h e l p t h e a g e n c i e s i n t e r n a l l y . S h e
f u r t h e r s u g g e s t e d t h a t o t h e r p r o b l e m s b e c o o r d i n a t e d i n i t i a l l y w i t h l o c a l a r e a
e n g i n e e r s a n d o n c e s t a t u s h a s b e e n d e t e r m i n e d , B i l l M o s b y s h o u l d b e c o p i e d
a s a f o l l o w u p .
M s . M e d i n a i n d i c a t e d t h a t a n o t h e r s u b c o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g w i l l b e s c h e d u l e d
a n d a r e p o r t w i l l b e m a d e t o t h e n e x t T A C m e e t i n g .
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
February 6, 2006
Page 4
In response to a suggestion to develop an e-mail questionnaire to determine
interest in funding a position, Ms. Mayer indicated that a draft questionnaire
will be developed for the next subcommittee meeting and if approved, it will
be sent to the TAC.
7. 2006 FTIP UPDATE
Ken Lobeck, RCTC, said the 2006 TIP is almost complete. There is a lot of
detail work on the interchanges because of the level of modeling and the
scrutiny the projects are under due to the environmental document.
Discussions with FHWA involve how detailed the FTIP needs to be regarding
the project descriptions.
He explained that the grace year for the SAFETEA-LU for the RTP means
that in July 2007 there might be a programming lockdown in that no new
projects will be allowed.
8. JANUARY 11, 2006 COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS
Shirley Medina stated that regarding the STIP agenda item, additional
adjustments to certain projects may be made and presented to the
Commission, depending on the outcome of the California Transportation
Commission staff review. A south county public hearing will be held in Los
Angeles on March 9. Prior to that meeting, staff comments are expected.
9. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
Regarding CMP, the floating car runs were done last week and Ms. Medina
will provide the results to the TAC via e-mail.
Ms. Medina provided a January 24, 2006 letter from Western Riverside
County Regional Conservation Authority regarding the 5% fee for TUMF
projects for freeway interchanges. As indicated in the letter, "the MSHCP
portion of the TUMF update should not include mitigation for interchanges."
Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley, announced the Executive
Committee meeting today at 2:00 to review the proposed fee schedule. The
fee schedule does not request an adjustment for this issue.
In response to a query regarding the strategic plan for the Measure A
extension, Ms. Mayer stated that it is not being called a strategic plan. It is
called a ten-year delivery plan and in December, the Commission approved
0
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
' February 6, 2006
Page 5
the contract with Bechtel to look at the projects that are included in the
2009 Measure and for Bechtel to do an objective assessment of the
priorities. Besides preparing the ten-year delivery plan, from a project
perspective the revenues for Measure A are being updated. She further
stated that the focus is the highway component. Regional arterials will come
next.
10. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory
Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 A.M. The next meeting is
scheduled for March 20, 2006, 10:00 A.M., Riverside County Transportation
Commission, Riverside County Regional Complex, 4080 Lemon Street,
Riverside, CA Conference Room A, 3`d Floor.
Respectfully submitted,
LCt,:24;
Shirley Medina
Program Manager
"
A G E N D A I T E M 5
A p r e s e n t a t i o n w i l l b e m a d e b u t
t h e r e i s n o a t t a c h m e n t t o t h e
a g e n d a f o r i t e m 5 .
j—
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
DATE:
March 27, 2006
TO:
Plans and Programs Committee
FROM:
Stephanie Wiggins, Regional` Programs Director
THROUGH:
Anne Mayer, Programming and Administration Director
SUBJECT:
Award of Alameda Corridor East (ACE) SAFETEA--LU Earmark
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Allocate $21 Million of the $31.25 Million of RCTC SAFETEA-LU ACE
Earmark funds as presented in Table A which represents the amount
requested by the local agencies;
2) Condition the allocation of $6 Million to the. City ,of -Riverside for
Jurupa Avenue contingent upon the reallocation of $6 Million in Local
Funds towards the design and construction of other railroad grade
separation projects in their City;
3) Authorize a 10-year loan from the Commercial Paper Program for up
to $1.5 million for the Sunset Avenue Grade Separation Project which
represents the maximum Commercial Paper amount available to the
City of Banning;
4) Designate the remaining unprogrammed balance of $10.25 Million for
construction funding for a Tier 1 or 'Tier 2 crossing(s) to be made
available on a rolling "first come/first serve" basis; and
5) Forward to the Commission for final approval
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
In July 2005, Congress approved the reauthorization of the Federal Transportation
Bill which is now known as SAFETEA-LU. Among the categories of earmarks are
the "Projects of National and Regional Significance." The Commission joined with
others in seeking an earmark for the Alameda Corridor East (ACE). The funds will
be split evenly between Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange and Los Angeles
Counties and used to mitigate the impacts of ever-increasing freight traffic. The
Commission anticipates $31.25 to be available for allocation to address immediate
grade separation needs.
Ca/1 for Projects Guidelines
At its December 2005 meeting, the Commission authorized the release of a Call for
Projects and approved the evaluation criteria for the Call. The guidelines for the
Call for Projects areas follows:
• Eligible Projects encompass Tier 1 and 2 grade crossings (approved in
October 2005) with an allowance for additional crossings substantially
impacted by switching activities:
BNSF (SB SUB) 1
Magnolia Av
Riverside County
BNSF & UP (SB SUB)
Chicago Av
Riverside
BNSF & UP (SB SUB)
3rd St
Riverside
BNSF & UP (SB SUB)
Columbia Av (BNSF)
Riverside
BNSF (SB SUB)
McKinley St
Corona
BNSF & UP (SB SUB)
Iowa Av (BNSF)
Riverside
BNSF (SB SUB)
Adams St
Riverside
BNSF(SB SUB)
Smith Av
Corona
UP (YUMA MAIN)
Sunset Av
Banning
BNSF (SB SUB)
Tyler St
Riverside
BNSF (SB SUB)
Mary St
Riverside
UP (LA SUB)
Jurupa Rd
Riverside County
BNSF (SB SUB)
Auto Center Dr
Corona
UP (YUMA MAIN)
Hargrave St
Banning
UP (LA SUB)
Magnolia Av
Riverside
BNSF (SB SUB)
Madison St
Riverside
UP (YUMA MAIN)
Avenue 48/Dillon Road
Indio/Coachella
BNSF & UP (SB SUB)
Center St
Riverside County
UP (LA SUB)
Clay St
Riverside County
BNSF & UP (SB SUB)
7th St
Riverside
UP (LA SUB)
Jurupa Ave
Riverside
UP (LA SUB)
Streeter Ave (due to switching)
Riverside
UP (LA SUB
Riverside Ave (due to switching)
Riverside
• Evaluation criteria of submittals emphasizes Project Delivery;
• Maximum award of $7.5 million (federal) per grade separation project with
an additional allowance of $7.5 million from the Commercial Paper Program
via a 10-year loan per project, if requested by applicant in accordance with
Commission policy; and
• 'Application submissions limited to 2 per jurisdiction.
Award Recommendation of $21 Million
Local agency staff" actively participated in the Call development process. Their
input was constructive and lead to an effective collaboration in designing the Call.
The process was initiated by performing a switching analysis on four Tier 3
crossings (Streeter Avenue, Brockton Avenue, and Riverside Avenue in the City of
Riverside and 22nd Street in the City of Banning) to determine if there was a
substantial impact on delay from switching activity that would impact their total
score. The incorporation of switching delay substantially increased the total
scores of the Streeter Avenue and Riverside Avenue crossings so as to move their
Priority Group up from Tier 3, thereby making them eligible for the Call for Projects.
While the total scores of the Brockton Avenue and 22nd Street crossings did
increase, it was not significant enough to move them out of Priority Group 3.
A Constraint Analysis was performed on the 23 eligible crossings by Parsons
Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc (PB). The purpose was to identify right-of-way
impacts, aesthetics, community impacts; and constructability of a grade separation
I at each crossing. PB then developed general 'cost estimates for each crossing in
i conjunction with the local agencies. The total cost estimates for the 23 crossings
is $918 Million. Given that $31 Million is available for the Call, the application
submittals focused on Project Readiness. A total of 6 projects from 5 agencies
requesting $21 Million were received:
Table A: SAFETEA LU Award Recommendation
Crossing
Jurisdiction
SAFETEA-
LU Request
Commercial
Paper
Request
Total Project
Cost
Est
Completion
Date
Construction
Ave 48/Dillon Rd
Coachella/Indio
$2,500,000
$0
$16,107,000
June 2007
Jurupa Ave'
Riverside
$6,000,000
$0
$21,740,000
June 2008
Sunset Ave
Banning
$7,500,000
$1,500,000
$21,000,000
July2008
Subtotal
$16,000,000
$1,500,000
$58,847,000
Project Development
Auto Center Dr
Corona
$1,500,000
$27,000,000
Clay St
Riverside
County
$2,500,000
$22,920,000
McKinley St
Corona
$1,000,000
$109,200,000
Subtotal
$5,000,000
$159,120,000
TOTALS
$21,000,000
$1,500,000 $217,967,000
*The City of Riverside allocation request is contingent upon City Council approval for reallocating
$6 million in Measure A funds from the Jurupa Avenue Underpass project towards the design and
construction of other railroad grade separation projects in the City. (see Attachment 1)
The Constraint Analysis and Cost Estimates are useful in outlining project delivery
challenges. The award supports projects that are further along in the development
process, while also recognizing the need to jump start priority projects. The
project benefits of these crossings are outlined below:
Table B: Project Benefits
Crossing
2005 Gate Down
Time per Day
2030 Gate Down
Time per Day
Accidents
(last 10 yrs)
2030
Emissions
(tons/yr)
Ave 48/Dillon Rd
1 hr, 14 min
2 hrs, 21 min
2
8
Jurupa Ave
1 hr, 23 min
2 hrs, 42 min
2
5
Sunset Ave
1 hr, 41 min
3 hrs, 21 min
1
19
Auto Center Dr
1 hr, 53 min
3 hrs, 30 min
1
20
Clay St
1 hr, 24 min
2 hrs, 42 min
1
12
McKinley St
1 hr, 45 min
3 hrs, 21 min
3
27
TOTALS
9 hrs, 20 min
17 hrs, 57 min
10
92
Unprogrammed Balance of $10.25 Mil/ion
Staff and the local agencies recognize the need for timely use of funds for project
delivery. Therefore, the recommendation is that the remaining unprogrammed
balance of $10.25 Million be designated for construction of eligible projects
designated as Tier 1 and 2 Crossings. Jurisdictions are able to submit their
application for these funds whenever the ,project is; shelf ready and the jurisdiction
has a funding plan for delivery_
Attachment: March 14, 2006 City of Riverside Letter
i
"
A G E N D A I T E M 6
"
A p r e s e n t a t i o n w i l l b e m a d e b u t
t h e r e i s n o a t t a c h m e n t t o t h e
a g e n d a f o r i t e m 6 .
"
peed and Length Assumptions
2005 Study Assumptions
2005
2030
Rail Road Line
Freight
Speed
Passenger
Speed
Freight
Length (ft)
Metrolink
Length (ft)
Amtrak
Length (ft)
Freight
Speed
Passenger
Speed
Freight
Length (ft)
Metrolink
Length (ft)
Amtrak
Length (ft)
UP (LA SUB)
50-65
50-65
5400
1000
50-65
50-65
8000
1000
BNSF (SB SUB)
50
50
5400
1000
3000
50
50
8000
1000
3000
BNSF & UP
40-50
40-50
5400
1000
3000
40-50
40-50 •
8000
1000
3000
UP (YUMA)
50
50
5400
3000
50
50
8000
3000
UP (YUMA) Coachellaw
50
50
5400
3000
50
50
8000
3000
Updated Analysis
Assumptions
2005
2030
Rail Road Line
Freight
Speed
Passenger
Speed
Freight
Length (ft)
Metrolink
Length (ft)
Amtrak
Length (ft)
Freight
Speed
Passenger
Speed
Freight
Length (ft)
Metrolink
Length (ft)
Amtrak
Length (ft)
UP (LA SUB)
30(a)
60Ca)
4000
500
30(a)
60(a)
6000
750
BNSF (SB SUB)
40
55(b)
4900
500
1000
40
55(b)
7350
750
1000
BNSF & UP
30
45
4700
500
1000
30
45
7050
750
1000
UP (YUMA)
25
40
4300
1000
25
40
6450
1000
UP (YUMA) Coachellam
40
50
4300
1000
40
50
6450
1000
(a) Riverside crossing wil have a freight speed of 25 mph and a passenger speed of 45 mph due to slow speed approching the rail line merge
(b) Lower passenger speed of 40 mph at Auto Center crossing due to near -by station
(c) faster speeds through Coachella (Ave 48 - Ave 66)
Trains Per Da v Assumptions
2005 Study
Rail Road Line
2005
2030
Freight
Metrolink
Amtrak
Freight
Metrolink
Amtrak
UP (LA SUB)
42
12
0
85
28
0
BNSF (SB SUB)
68
21
2
120
36
4
BNSF & UP
110
9
2
194
24
4
UP (YUMA)
46
0
1
87
0
1
Updated Analysis
Rail Road Line
2005
2030
Freight
Metrolink
Amtrak
Freight
Metrolink
Amtrak
UP (LA SUB)
30
12
0
45
28
0
BNSF (SB SUB)
41
25
2
62
38
4
BNSF & UP (Cridge)
71
33
2
107
62
4
BNSF & UP
71
8
2
107
24
4
UP (YUMA)
36
0
1
54
0
1
* Metrolink numbers from sum of 91 line and Inland Empire-OC line trains (normal operating schedule)
* Following the 2005 Study, a 50% growth was applied to train numbers for 2030 data
* Cridge has 33 (2005) and 62 (2030) Metrolink trains (BNSF plus BNSF&UP)
Train Numbers and -Time of Dav
2005
2030
Rail Road Line
# of Freight
Trains
# of Metrolink
Trains
# of Amtrak
Trains
Time Period
# of Freight
Trains
# of Metrolink
Trains
# of Amtrak
Trains
Time Period
UP (LA SUB)
13
2
0
Eve/Night
20
7
0
Eve/Night
7
7
0
Peak
10
14
0
Peak
10
3
0
Midday
15
7
0
Midday
BNSF (SB SUB)
22
3
0
Eve/Night
33
4
0
Eve/Night
10
14
2
Peak
15
22
4
Peak
9
8
0
Midday
14
12
0
Midday
BNSF & UP
34
4
0
Eve/Night
51
9
0
Eve/Night
Cridge
19
19
2
Peak
29
34
4
Peak
18
10
0
Midday
27
19
0
Midday
BNSF & UP
34
1
0
Eve/Night
51
5
0
Eve/Night
19
5
2
Peak
29
12
4
Peak
18
2
0
Midday
27
7
0
Midday
UP (YUMA)
13
0
0
Eve/Night
20
0
0
Eve/Night
11
0
1
Peak
17
0
1
Peak
12
0
0
Midday
18
0
0
Midday
Peak Hours = 5 am - 8 am and 3 pm - 7 pm
Midday Hours = 8am - 3 pm
Evening/Night Hours = 7 pm - 5 am
Switching/Operational Delay: Trains were considered to fall under this category through the comparison of count
data on adjacent crossings on the same date. These comparisons noted the individual trains which did not travel
though the adjacent crossings during comparative times. These noted trains were then considered
"switching/operational delay" if their speeds were slow (<20 mph), their gate down time was substantial (>1:00), and
they were not overly lengthy (< 10 cars) which would increase gate down time. Crossings at which comparisons
could not be made defined "switching/operational delay" trains as trains which had slow speeds (<20 mph),
substantial gate down time (>1:00), and were not overly lengthy (< 10 cars).
The individual switching/operational delay at each counted crossing will be used in the updated analysis, and a
typical switching/operational delay will be asigned to all other crossings on each rail line. Any individual crossing with
lower switching/operational delay than the typical will be bumped up to match the typical delay for that rail line.
Below are the assigned switching/operational delay.
Switching/Operational Delay Assumptions
Rail Road Line
Switch/Oper.
Trains per Day
Switch/Oper.
Gate Down Time
per Day -Time
Switch/Oper. Gate
Down Time per
Night -Time
Typical
Switch/Oper.
Day -time Delay
Typical
Switch/Oper.
Night-time Delay
UP (LA SUB)
0:06:00
0:04:00
Jurupa Rd
6
0:22:39
0:31:22
Clay
1
0:01:18
0:05:02
Streeter
2
0:11:37
0:06:36
Brockton
0
0:03:10
0:00:00
Magnolia
2
0:19:25
0:00:00
Riverside
3
0:20:01
0:11:55
BNSF (SB SUB)
0:02:00
0:00:00
Auto Center
6
0:10:19
0:00:00
Mc Kinley
1
0:03:29
0:00:00
Adams
0
0:01:31
0:00:00
BNSF & UP
0:05:00
0:01:00
7th
2
0:05:16
0:01:14
Center
3
0:06:50
0:00:34
UP (YUMA)
0:05:00
0:02:00
Sunset
1
0:04:51
0:00:00
22nd
1
0:07:16
0:00:00
Hargrave
5
0:14:15
0:03:22
Ave 54
4
0:10:35
0:02:38
Total Priority Comparison
as of 3/20/06
Ref
No.
Cross
Street
October Study
Update - Base Assmp.
Update - Switching
Jurisdiction
Overall
Weighted
Score
Group
by
percentile
Overall
Weighted
Score
Group
by
percentile
Overall
Weighted
Score
Group
by
percentile
1
Jurupa Rd
Riverside County
3462
2
3512
2
4412 i1
2
Chicago Av
Riverside
4380
4525
1
4330
1
4330
1
3
Magnolia Av
Riverside County
1
4250
1
4250
1
4
3rd St
Riverside
4060
1
4010
1
4010
1
5
McKinley St
Corona
3950
1
3950
1
3950
1
6
Columbia Av (BNSF)
Riverside
4000
1
3950
1
3950
1
7
Magnolia Av
Riverside
3380
2
3355
2
<;._3880 -
t --,-
8
Sunset Av
Banning
3500
2
3800
1
3800
1
9
Riverside Av
Riverside
2810
3
3010 '
2
11,237785 `'
10
Iowa Av (BNSF)
Riverside
3820
1
3770
1
3770
1
11
Adams St
Riverside
3665
1
3590
2
3665
2
.12
13
Auto Center Dr
Corona
3438
2
3238
2
3638
2
Hargrave St
Banning
3425
2
3625
2
3625
2
2
14
Clay St
Riverside County
3235
3613
2
2
3535
2
3535
15
Smith Av
Corona
3263
2
3263
2
16
7th St
Riverside
3135
2
2910
2
3110
2
17
Tyler St
Riverside
3500
2
3075
2
3100
2
18
22nd St
Banning
2375
3
3100
2
3100
2
19
Avenue 48/Dillon Road
Indio/Coachella
3325
2
2875
2
3075
2
20
Center St
Riverside County
3283
2
2808
2
3008
2
121
San Gorgonio Av
Banning
2300
4
2800
2
3000
2
22
Streeter Av
Riverside
2515
3
2265
3
, 2965,
2
23
Jurupa Ave
Riverside
not included in study
2700
2
2925
2
24
Palmyrita Av (UP)
Riverside
3010
3
2835
2
2835
2
25
Spruce St (BNSF)
Riverside
2845
3
i 2695
2
2695
2
26
Madison St
Riverside
3340
2
2640
2
2690
2
{27
Brockton Av
Riverside
2400
3
2250
3
2650
2 . ,
128
Mary St
Riverside
3465
2
2640
2
2640
2
129
Pierce St
Riverside
3090
3
2590
3
2590
3
i 30
31
Avenue 62
Riverside County
2525
3
2544
3
2544
3
Railroad St
Corona
2925
3
2475
3
2475
3
32
Panorama Rd
Riverside
1290_
4
1365
4
'2465 ,,
33
Buchanan St
_
Riverside
2800
3
2400
3
2400
3
34
Bellgrave Av
Riverside County
2048
4
2123
3
2348
3
35
Avenue 66
Riverside County
2158
4
2065
4
,2265
36
Palm Av
Riverside
1965
4
2040
4
x''2265
37
Avenue 52
Coachella
2233
4
2033
4
2251,
38
California Av
Beaumont
1500
4
2000
4
2200,
t .z,
39
San Timoteo Canyon Rd
Calimesa
2100
4
2100
3
2100
3
40
Washington St
Riverside
2580
3
1880
4
2080
4
41
Apache Trail
Riverside County
1727
4
2052
4
2052
4
42
Rutile St
Riverside County
1746
4
1796
4
2046
4
43
Jefferson St
Riverside
2380
3
2030
4
2030
„4
44
Cridge St
Riverside
2650
3
2025
4"
2025
4
45
Viele Av
Beaumont
1983
4
1983
4
1983
4
46
Cota St
Corona
2113
4
1938
4
1938
4
47
Broadway
Riverside County
1604
4
1904
4
1904
4
48
Mountain View Av
Riverside
1450
4
1450
4
1650
4
49
Airport Drive
Riverside County
1892
4
1592
4
1592
4
50
Main St
Riverside County
1681
4
1531
4
1531
4
51
Jackson St
Riverside
1805
4
1330
4
1330
4
52
Pennsylvania Av
Beaumont
917
5
1242
4
1267
4
53
Joy St
Corona
1525
4
1250
4
1250
4
54
Harrison St
Riverside
1545
4
1120
4
1120
4
55
Tipton Rd
Palm Springs
1100
_
5
1100
4
1100
4
56
Radio Rd
Corona
1400
4
1075
5
1075
5
57
158
Jane St
Avenue 54
Riverside
1310
4
860
5
1060
5
Coachella
Riverside County
Corona
_
767
5
5
767
5
767
5
159
Avenue 58
638
813
688
5
688
5
60
Sheridan St
5
663
5
663
5
61
Gibson St
Riverside
695
5
520
5
520
5
Change in priority group from October study
Change in priority group due to switching
"
"
A G E N D A I T E M 7
A p r e s e n t a t i o n w i l l b e m a d e b u t
t h e r e i s n o a t t a c h m e n t t o t h e
a g e n d a f o r i t e m 7 .
- DRAFT -
Memorandum of Understanding
Between
the Riverside County Transportation Commission on Behalf of
Local Agencies and the
California Department of Transportation District 08
Regarding Project Delivery Issues Resolution
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), entered into effect on date
between the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), acting
on behalf of local agencies, and the California Department of Transportation
(Department) District 08 outlines the general areas of responsibility for various
project development activities, including reviews and approvals, for proposed
improvements including but not limited to, state highways (non-SHOPP), local
arterials, transit/rail, and bridge projects. This MOU constitutes a guide to the
intentions and strategies of the parties involved and is not intended to authorize
funding or project effort nor is it a legally binding contract.
This MOU covers project development, oversight, obligation of funds,
expenditures, and all other activities that require the administration of funds
and/or project approvals from the Department, starting with initial project
development phases through project closeout. Cooperative Agreements will
continue to be required for specific state highway projects. The intent of this
MOU would serve as an enhancement to the Cooperative Agreements entered
between the Department and Commission/Local agencies for state highway
projects that require Cooperative Agreements.
INTENT
The intent of this MOU is to establish a true partnership between the Department,
Commission and Local Agencies to improve project delivery, and define how the
entities will work together as one Project Team to successfully deliver projects in
a timely and efficient manner.
GENERAL
The Commission and Local Agencies serve as lead agency for various projects
consisting of federal, state, and local fund sources. The administration of state
and federal funds is the responsibility of the Department Office of Local
Assistance. Project approvals on or off the state highway system, regardless of
the fund source, is the responsibility of the Department. The Commission and
Local Agencies desire to streamline, to the extent possible, the processes
established to administer state and federal projects including improved
communications with the Department. Further, a better understanding of the
- DRAFT -
within 3 ?? days describing the actions needed to complete and correct
the submittal.
4) All Department comments must be in writing and sent to lead agency
and/or designee at one time, instead of piecemeal.
5) The Department will immediately notify the lead agency of any staff
changes affecting their project and will fully inform the new staff of status
and key decisions/commitments previously agreed upon.
6) The Department will strive to meet the agreements contained in this MOU
and if any conditions arise that prevent any of the items in this agreement
from being met, the Department will immediately inform the Commission
and lead agencies.
7) Train Department staff on any areas that are problematic in project
delivery including conferring with other Districts and Headquarters, the
Commission, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit
Agency.
8) Continue to provide courses and workshops to the Commission, Local
agencies and consultants on processing federal -aid projects.
9) Allocate sufficient staff to manage volume of projects.
Commission and Local Agencies agree to:
1) Ensure key staff is knowledgeable with the federal -aid project process by
attending training courses offered by the Department, FHWA, or other
qualified training institution.
2) Notify Department staff prior to submitting project documents that the
document is being mailed or hand delivered, and indicate the key local
agency contact person.
3) Local agency staff will contract with consultants experienced with the
federal aid process, closely monitor their work, and aware of all
correspondence between Department and consultant.
4) Notify the Department of any changes in local agency staff or consultant
assignments.
5) Hold and attend project status meetings/project delivery team (PDT)
meetings (PDT), if applicable, and respond to Department questions
expeditiously and in writing.
- DRAFT -
6) The Commission and local agencies will strive to meet the agreements
contained in this MOU and if any conditions arise that prevent any of the
agreements from being met, the Commission and local agencies will
immediately inform the Department.
7) The Commission and local agencies will work strategically and
cooperatively in planning and programming projects to distribute project
activity throughout the year and provide for realistic project scheduling.
ISSUES RESOLUTION
In the event the Department, Commission, or local agency encounters a problem
with project delivery, including the above terms of agreement, the Issues
Resolution will serve as a guide in resolving any disagreements or concerns
encountered during any phase of project delivery.
It is the intent of the Commission, the Department, and local agencies to resolve
issues at the lowest level possible. However, issues arise in the project life -cycle
and they need to be resolved as diligently as possible requiring the need to be
elevated to upper management when consensus cannot be obtained.
Therefore, the following levels describe how issues are to be elevated in the
event the issues cannot be resolved within each level of the project team.
First Level Team: Project Manager and Department Staff (below Deputy
Director level)
Issues will arise in the midst of the project team's effort to develop the project.
Many of these issues can be resolved within the project team's level, especially
those that do not change the scope of the Project, do not require additional
budget and that do not delay the approved schedule. The staff involved will
review issues that arise, discuss the options for resolution, the pros and cons to
each option, and any advocate's reasons in support of a specific option(s).
Provided the resolution does not change the scope, cost and schedule of the
project, the first level team should determine the outcome. If the first level team
either does not have sufficient authority to resolve the issue or is unable to agree,
then they will elevate the issue immediately, within 3 days, to the second level
team.
Second Level Team: Public Works/Planning Director or City Engineer and
Department's Local Assistance Deputy Director
The first level team will prepare a document presenting the issue, options for
resolution, and the pros and cons to each option including any advocate's
- DRAFT -
reasons in support of specific options. This level should determine the outcome
of the resolution provided they have sufficient authority to resolve the issue. If
not, then they will elevate the issue immediately, within 3 days, to the third level
team.
Third Level Team: City Manager/Mayor/Councilmember and
Department's District Director
The third (and final) level team will review the document prepared by the first
level team with additional comments provided by the second level team. The
issue must be resolved within this level. If for some reason, the issue cannot be
fully resolved without approval from the City Council and/or the Department, then
the third level team will direct preparation of agenda items for any required action
needed to ratify their agreed upon solution.
Decisions made at each review level are to be documented by the Project
Manager or a designee thereof and stored in the project file to become a
permanent part of the project history.
OMBUDSMAN SERVICE QUERY
City
Interested?
Willing to Pay?
Banning
No response
No response
Beaumont
No response
No response
Blythe
No response
No response
CVAG
No response
No response
Calimesa
No response
No response
Canyon Lake
Yes
Yes
Cathedral City
No response
No response
Coachella
No
No
Corona
No response
No response
Desert Hot Springs
Yes
Subject to council
Hemet
Yes
Subject to council
Indian Wells
Yes
Yes
Indio
Yes
Yes
La Quinta
Yes
Yes
Lake Elsinore
No response
No response
Moreno Valley
Yes -not for individual agencies
Murrieta
No
No
Norco
Willing to discuss
Willing to discuss
Palm Desert
Yes
Yes
Palm Springs
N res e„—,T y`_S
-1 e-respeAss >ie s
Perris
Yes
Yes
PVVTA
No response
No response
RTA
No
No
Rancho Mirage
No
No
City of Riverside
No response
No response
Riverside County
No
No
San Jacinto
Yes
Yes
SunLine
No response
No response
Temecula
Yes
Yes, subject to council
WRCOG
No response
No response
"
A G E N D A I T E M 8
A p r e s e n t a t i o n w i l l b e m a d e b u t
t h e r e i s n o a t t a c h m e n t t o t h e
a g e n d a f o r i t e m 8 .
"
MYYBIYMIN A11l013RBllpE1l1NlWd Y
11
Mrld MAI= 111
=di 110111111 MEM EISA
RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED
PROJECT - "RCIP"
•'•
• Land use and infrastructure decisions driven by
environmental issues, especially endangered
and threatened species
❖ Deal with environmental issues as a component
of land use and infrastructure planning
❖ Three-part integrated and complementary
program:
■ Transportation
■ General Plan (Land Use)
■ Habitat Conservation
Wes ern Riverside Coun y Mu iple
Speees Habitat Conservation Plan
❖ Spearheaded by Riverside County Board of Supervisors (as the
linchpin to the RCIP)
❖ Ultimately supported by 14 Western Riverside County Cities
❖ Adopted in 2003
❖ Designed to protect up to146 species (32 listed species)
❖ Plan area encompasses 1.2 million acres in Western Riverside
County
❖ Planned reserve of 500,000 acres
❖ 347,000 acres existing (Federal, State and local public lands)
• Approximately 153,000 acres of Additional Reserve Lands
PLAN STRUCTURE
❖ 300,000 acres designated for
potential conservation (no hard line)
+ Criteria cells (160 acres each)
❖ Each cell contains conservation
objectives
❖ Assemble a reserve of 153,000 acres
out of 300,000 acres
❖ Linkages to core areas a,co
E
t s>
b;;d!
�>� #
I
Acquisition of Land
❖ Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition
Process: negotiation of conserved
area
•'• Direct purchase
Funding Strategy
❖ Fair share -Local, State and Federal
❖ Local Funding
■ Development mitigation fees
■ Landfill fees
■ Infrastructure contribution
+ State participation
❖ Federal participation
TABLE
LOCAL PUBLIC/REGIONAL FUNDING SOURCES
Source Anticipated
$ Range Requirements to Implement Responsible Party
Public Funding Sources
El Sobrante Landfill
County Landfills
Eagle Mountain Landfill
Local Roads
Other Transportation
Other infrastructure
Projects
Flood Control
Private Funding Sources:
Cities and County
Development Mitigation Fees
Density Bonus Fees
$90M In place
$10M In place
$unknown In place pending start-up
$121M Approval of Measure A, local
agreement on allocation
$250M % of new road construction
3%-5% Project -by -project negotiation
$19M
$539.6M Approval of County ordinance
Approval of City(s) ordinance
$66M Approval of General Plan
County
County
County
RCTC/Co unty
County
County and Cities
RCFCWCD
TABLE 8=2
TOTAL LOCAL PROGRAM COSTS
(not adjusted for inflation)
25 years and 75 years
Program Costs
'�w.
First 25 ears 75 years
�.- :n C';...:Y,iti'* m i".. ` s. ;� _,r °v§"'7^`rt-
Acquisition of Additional Reserve Lands (56,000 acres) $733.6M $733.6M
Preserve Management (152,000acres) $111M $424.5M
Adaptive Management (152,000acres) $44.5M $214.3M
Biological Monitoring (152,000 acres) $34.7M $112M
Program Administration $30M $ 55M
TOTAL COSTS $953.8M $1,539,4M
E coo
V' C o v e r a g e f o r c r i t i c a l i n f r a s t r u c t u r e p r o j e c t s
" C o m p l y w i t h d e s i g n r e q u i r e m e n t s
" C o n t r i b u t i o n ( 3 % - 5 % ) t o P l a n
V' L o c a l c o n t r o l o f e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o c e s s
V' C e r t a i n t y i n d e v e l o p m e n t p r o c e s s
V' P e r m i t s f o r c i t y p r o j e c t s
V' O p e n s p a c e s e c u r e d
V' P u b l i c a c c e s s o f n a t u r a l a r e a s
V' O v e r 7 5 % o f c o n s e r v a t i o n o c c u r s o u t s i d e c i t y
b o u n d a r i e s
V' S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n f u n d i n g
V' U m b r e l l a F e d e r a l a n d S t a t e p e r m i t s t o " t a k e "
e n d a n g e r e d s p e c i e s
What is the RCA?
A Joint Powers Authority created to
implement the MSCHP
Comprised of:
14 Western Riverside County cities and
the County of Riverside.
RCA Obligations Under the Plan
❖ Collect and expend local development mitigation
fees
❖ Purchase lands to assemble the Reserve and
coordinate assembly of the conservation lands
❖ Coordinate implementation with Cities and County
❖ Manage and monitor conservation lands
❖ Administer and oversee implementation of the
MSHCP permits
❖ RCA is not a regulatory agency
•S RCA has no land use authority
County and City Obligations
+ Collect local development mitigation fees and
remit to RCA
❖ Contribution from infrastructure
• Negotiate with developers to conserve lands
needed for reserve
❖ Comply with policies to protect species as
identified in plan
• Conduct joint project review with RCA to ensure
project/actions are in consistent with the Plan
❖ Participate in RCA
❖ Enforce terms of project approvals to ensure
compliance with MSHCP°t co`
w,.
Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly
California Gnatcatcher
Quino Checkerspot
Butterfly
" A G E N D A I T E M 9
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
M a r c h 2 0 , 2 0 0 6
T O :
T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r
S U B J E C T :
2 0 0 6 C o n g e s t i o n M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m U p d a t e
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e T A C t o :
1 ) R e v i e w t h e u p d a t e d t r a f f i c c o u n t i n f o r m a t i o n p r o v i d e d i n t h e
a t t a c h m e n t ; a n d
2 ) A p p r o v e t h e 2 0 0 6 C o n g e s t i o n M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m U p d a t e
a n d f o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a t i t s A p r i l 1 2 , 2 0 0 6 m e e t i n g
f o r f o r m a l a d o p t i o n .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
A t t h e N o v e m b e r T A C m e e t i n g , t h e T A C r e c o m m e n d e d t o c o n t i n u e t h e C M P
u p d a t e i t e m t o a l l o w m o r e t i m e t o r e v i e w t h e t r a f f i c c o u n t d a t a i n s p e c i f i c a r e a s .
A t t h e J a n u a r y 2 0 0 6 T A C m e e t i n g , t h e T A C r e q u e s t e d t h a t V R P A t a k e a d d i t i o n a l
t r a f f i c c o u n t s a l o n g 1 - 2 1 5 , S R 7 9 , A l e s s a n d r o B o u l e v a r d i n W e s t e r n C o u n t y , a n d
u p d a t e c o u n t s a l o n g R a m o n R o a d a n d M o n t e r e y A v e n u e i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y .
G e o r g i e n a V i v i a n o f V R P A T e c h n o l o g i e s w i l l a t t e n d t h e M a r c h 2 0 T A C m e e t i n g
t o r e p o r t o n t h e r e s u l t s a n d a n s w e r a n y q u e s t i o n s .
W e a s k t h a t T A C m e m b e r s r e f e r t o t h e C M P u p d a t e d o c u m e n t t h a t w a s m a i l e d t o
t h e T A C m e m b e r s i n N o v e m b e r . P l e a s e c o n t a c t S h i r l e y G o o d i n g i f y o u n e e d
a n o t h e r c o p y .
TABLE 1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
RAW DATA - FLOATING CAR RUN -1-15 AM SB
Node
#
1
Length
0
Node Names
Jurupa St off ramp
Travel
Time
# o
Stops
Avg
Speed
Time <=
0 MPH
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <=
30 MPH
2
7846
SR-60
106.0
0.0
50.5
0.0
0.3
17.0
3
16948
Limonite Ave
163.7
0.0
70.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
4
14072
Bth St
141.3
0.0
67.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
10239
2nd St
105.0
0.0
66.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
6
4094
Hidden Valley Pkwy
40.7
0.0
68.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
7
7246
SR-91
72.0
0.0
68.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
6108
Magnolia Ave
60.3
0.0
69.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9
8610
Ontario Rd
86.7
0.0
67.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
4651
El Cerrito Rd
46.7
0.0
68.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
5412
Cajalco Rd
52.3
0.0
70.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
6084
Weirick Rd
60.0
0.0
69.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
12659
Temescal Canyon Rd
125.3
0.0
68.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
14984
Indian Truck Trail
149.7
0.0
68.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
19650
Lake St
188.0
0.0
71.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
14969
Nichols Rd
145.3
0.0
70.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
8243
Central Ave
81.3
0.0
69.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
6835
Main St
68.0
0.0
68.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
19
9439
Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr
96.0
0.0
67.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20
15014
Bundy Canyon Rd
147.7
0.0
69.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
21
6501
Baxter Rd
60.7
0.0
73.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
22
7649
Clinton Kieth Rd
74.0
0.0
70.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
23
15928
Califomia Oaks/Kalmia St
157.7
0.0
68.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
24
5975
Murrieta Hot Springs Rd
58.3
0.0
69.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
25
4461
I-215/1-15 split
43.7
0.0
69.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
26
10623
Winchester Rd
108.7
0.0
66.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
27
8526
Rancho California Rd
84.3
0.0
68.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
28
6326
SR-79S SB Ramp
71.7
0.0
60.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total 259092
2595.0
0.0
68.1
0.0
0.3
17.0
1-15 AM-SB- Study Stats
TABLE 2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CHIP
Node
#
1
Length
0
RAW DATA - FLOATING
Node Names
I
SR-79S NB Ramp
Travel
Time
CAR RUN
# of
Stops
- I-15
Avg
Speed
AM
Time <=
0 MPH
NB
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <-
30 MP
2
6970
Rancho California Rd
69.3
0.0
68.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
3
8601
Winchester Rd
83.0
0.0
70.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
4
11350
I-215/1-15 split
106.3
0.0
72.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
3677
Murrieta Hot Springs Rd
33.7
0.0
74.5
0.0
0.0
. 0.0
6
6102
California Oaks/Kalmia St
59.7
0.0
69.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
7
15972
Clinton Kieth Rd
151.7
0.0
71.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
7471
Baxter Rd
69.0
0.0
73.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
9
6552
Bundy Canyon Rd
62.0
0.0
72.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
15215
Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr
146.0
0.0
71.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
9312
Main St
90.3
0.0
70.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
, 12
6845
Central Ave
65.7
0.0
71.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
8328
Nichols Rd
80.0
0.0
71.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
15056
Lake St
145.0
0.0
70.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
19456
Indian Truck Trail
186.3
0.0
71.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
15079
Temescal Canyon Rd
197.7
0.7
52.0
1.0
9.3
' 54.3
17
12576
Weirick Rd
433.0
4.3
19.8
25.0
93.7
365.7
18
6098
Cajalco Rd
166.7
0.7
24.9
1.7
11.3
121.0
19
5383
El Cerrito Rd
85.3
0.0
43.0
0.0
0.0
16.3
20
4570
Ontario Rd
49.3
0.0
63.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
21
8728
Magnolia Ave
115.0
0.0
51.7
0.0
0.0
33.0
22
6003
SR-91
63.7
0.0
64.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
23
7302
Hidden Valley Pkwy
125.0
0.7
39.8
1.0
13.0
55.7
24
4008
2nd St
159.7
1.3
17.1
2.3
45.7
147.7
25
10337
6th St
223.3
0.3
31.6
4.0
9.0
100.3
26
13999
Limonite Ave
259.0
0.7
36.9
1.7
13.0
82.3
27
16912
SR-60
216.0
0.0
53.4
0.0
1.7
20.3
28
8322
Jurupa St off ramp
131.7
0.0
43.1
0.0
0.0
35.7
Total 260224
3573.3
8.7
49.7
36.7
1-15 AM -NB- Study Stats
TABLE 3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
RAW DATA FLOATING CAR RUN -1-15 PM SB
Node
#
1
Length
0
Node Names
Jurupa St off ramp
Travel
Time
# of
Stops
Avg
Speed
Time <=
0 MPH
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <=
30 MP
2
7860
SR-60
166.7
0.7
32.2
2.0
13.3
89.3
3
16946
Limonite Ave
296.7
1.3
38.9
4.7
15.0
113.3
4
14044
6th St
181.7
0.0
52.7
0.0
4.7
25.0
5
10208
2nd St
122.0
0.0
57.0
0.0
0.0
9.0
6
4086
Hidden Valley Pkwy
42.0
0.0
66.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
7
7373
SR-91
76.0
0.0
66.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
6021
Magnolia Ave
97.3
0.0
42.2
0.0
0.0
46.0
9
8631
Ontario Rd
297.0
1.0
19.8
2.0
34.0
274.3
10
4628
El Cerrito Rd
124.0
0.0
25.4
0.0
0.0
94.0
11
5420
Cajalco Rd
65.0
0.0
56.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
6086
Weirick Rd
65.0
0.0
63.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
12579
Temescal Canyon Rd
133.7
0.0
64.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
15029
Indian Truck Trail
146.0
0.0
70.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
19641
Lake St
188.7
0.0
71.0
0.0
0.0
O.
16
14926
Nichols Rd
141.3
0.0
72.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
8316
Central Ave
79.3
0.0
71.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
6821
Main St
66.0
0.0
70.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
19
9373
Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr
92.0
0.0
69.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
14997
Bundy Canyon Rd
145.0
0.0
70.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
21
6603
Baxter Rd
65.0
0.0
69.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
22
7639
Clinton Kieth Rd
75.3
0.0
69.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
23
15959
California Oaks/Kalmia St
156.7
0.0
69.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
24
5921
Murrieta Hot Springs Rd
57.3
0.0
70.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
25
3999
I-215/I-15 split
38.0
0.0
71.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
26
11042
Winchester Rd
108.0
0.0
69.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
27
8686
Rancho Califomia Rd
84.3
0.0
70.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
28
6294
SR-79S SB Ramp
66.7
0.0
64.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total 259128
3176.7
3.0
55.6
8.7
67.0
1-15 PM-SB- Study Stats
TABLE 4
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
Node
#
1
Length
0
RAW DATA - FLOATING
Node Names
SR-79S NB Ramp
Travel
Time
CAR
# of
Stops
RUN - 1-15
Avg
Speed
PM
Time <=
0 MPH
NB
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <=
30 MPH
2
7060
Rancho California Rd
158.7
0.7
30.3
3.0
14.7
99.0
3
8672
Winchester Rd
219.0
1.0
27.0
2.7
14.3
144.
4
11266
I-215/1-15 split
143.3
0.0
53.6
0.0
0.0
11.1
5
3709
Murrieta Hot Springs Rd
35.3
0.0
71.6
0.0
0.0
0.�
6
6034
Califomia Oaks/Kalmia St
57.7
0.0
71.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
7
15984
Clinton Kieth Rd
160.0
0.0
68.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
7528
Baxter Rd
74.0
0.0
69.4
0.0
0.0
0. 1
9
6486
Bundy Canyon Rd
66.0
0.0
67.0
0.0
0.0
0, I
10
15204
Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr
153.3
0.0
67.6
0.0
0.0
O.
11
9384
Main St
93.3
0.0
68.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
6834
Central Ave
64.7
0.0
72.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
8282
Nichols Rd
79.3
0.0
71.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
15043
Lake St
145.7
0.0
70.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
19516
Indian Truck Trail
188.0
0.0
70.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
15031
Temescal Canyon Rd
149.7
0.0
68.5
0.0
0.0
2.7
17
12587
Weirick Rd
226.0
0.3
38.0
2.7
10.0
103.
18
6076
Cajalco Rd
101.7
0.0
40.7
0.0
3.0
30.1
19
5396
El Cerrito Rd
63.3
0.0
58.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
20
4560
Ontario Rd
49.0
0.0
63.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
21
8686
Magnolia Ave
90.0
0.0
65.8
0.0
0.0
0.1
22
6017
SR-91
74.3
0.0
55.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
23
7338
Hidden Valley Pkwy
173.3
3.7
28.9
14.0
59.3
114.
24
4073
2nd St
93.0
0.3
29.9
2.0
12.0
65.1
25
10276
6th St
172.3
0.7
40.7
5.0
13.0
59.
26
14006
Limonite Ave
196.7
0.3
48.6
0.0
10.7
28.0
27
16841
SR-60
173.3
0.0
66.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
28
8348
Jurupa St off ramp
143.7
0.0
39.6
0.0
0.0
53.0
Total
260237
3344.7
7.0
53.0
29.3
137.0
709.3
1-15 PM -NB- Study Stats
TABLE 5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
Node
#
1
Length
0
RAW DATA - FLOATING
Node Names
SR-60
Travel
Time
CAR RUN
# of
Stop
- 1-215
Avg
Speed
AM
Time <=
0 MPH
SB
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <
30 MP
2
5197
Eucalyptus/Eastridge Ave
55.3
0.0
64.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3
5465
E. Alessandro Blvd
51.3
0.0
72.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
4
3462
Cactus Ave/March ARB
33.7
0.0
70.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
8324
Van Buren Blvd
80.3
0.0
70.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
, 6
9754
Oleander Ave
94.3
0.0
70.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
7
7430
Ramona Expy
73.7
0.0
68.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
15950
Nuevo Rd
157.0
0.0
69.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
9
4080
D St
42.3
0.0
65.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
4800
SR-74 West/4th St
47.3
0.0
69.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
14648
SR-74 East
147.0
0.0
67.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
3995
Ethanac Rd
41.0
0.0
66.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
10137
McCall Blvd
102.7
0.0
67.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
12250
Newport Rd
157.3
0.0
53.1
0.0
1.3
29.7
15
15863
Scott Rd
280.3
2.0
38.6
4.0
28.0
111.0
16
15832
Clinton Keith Rd
213.0
0.0
50.7
0.0
1.3
44.0
17
9812
Los Alamos Rd
98.0
0.0
68.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
6007
Murrieta Hot Springs
64.0
0.0
64.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
, 19
7102
1-215 / I-15 NB Split
79.7
0.0
60.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total 160108
1818.3
2.0
60.0
4.0
30.7
184.7
1-215 AM-SB- Study Stats
TABLE 6
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
Node
#
- 1
RAW
Length
0
DATA - FLOATING
Node Names
1-215 / 1-15 NB Split
CAR
Travel
Time
-
RUN
# of
Stops
-1-215
Avg
Speed
AM NB
Time <=
0 MPH
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <-
30 MP
2
4583
- Murrieta Hot Springs
44.0
0.0
71.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3
6084
Los Alamos Rd
59.3
0.0
69.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
4
- 9769
- Clinton Keith Rd
106.7
0.0
62.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
15884
Scott Rd
154.3
0.0
70.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
6
15964
Newport Rd
149.3
0.0
72.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
7
12046
McCall Blvd
118.7
0.0
69.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
10133
Ethanac Rd
177.3
0.7
39.0
2,3
22.0
90.0
9
4075
SR-74 East
108.3
1.3
25.6
1.7
.. 17.7
84.0
10
14689
SR-74 West/4th St
231.7
1.0
43.2
0.0
10.0
78.3
11
5548
D St
58.0
0.0
65.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
3233
Nuevo Rd
32.7
0.0
67.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
16075
Ramona Expy
153.3
0.0
71.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
7908
Oleander Ave
77.0
0.0
70.0
0.0
0.0
- 0.0
15
9258
Van Buren Blvd
97.0
0.0
65.1
0.0
- 0.0
0.0
16
8426
Cactus Ave/March ARB
81.3
0.0
70.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
3300
E. Alessandro Blvd
34.7
0.0
64.9
0.0
0.0
0.7
18
5401
Eucalyptus/Eastridge Ave
418.3
10.7
8.8
_ 38.7
- 277.7
411.3
19
5078
SR-60
327.3
7.0
10.6
24.0
177.0
326.7
Total
157454
2429.3
20.7
44.2
66.7
504.3
991.0
1-215 AM -NB- Study Stats
TABLE 7
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
RAW DATA - FLOATING CAR RUN-1-2'15 PM SB
Node
#
1
Length
0
Node Names
SR-60
Travel
Time
# of
Stops
Avg
Speed
Time <=
0 MPH
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <
30 MP
2
5288
EucalyptuslEastridge Ave
61.3
0.0
58.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
3
5392
E. Alessandro Blvd
53.7
0.0
68.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 4
3488
Cactus Ave/March ARB
34.7
0.0
68.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 5
8336
Van Buren Blvd
83.3
0.0
68.2
0.0
0.0
.0.0
6
9742
Oleander Ave
103.7
0.0
64.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
7
7345
Ramona Expy
76.3
0.0
65.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
16030
Nuevo Rd
198.3
0.0
55.1
0.0
5.3
44.7
9
4057
D St
42.0
0.0
65.9
0.0
. 0.0
0.0
10
4847
SR-74 WesV4th St
52.0
0.0
63.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
14583
SR-74 East
163.0
0.0
61.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
12
4052
Ethanac Rd
40.7
0.0
67.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
10164
McCall Blvd
103.0
0.0
67.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
12223
Newport Rd
126.0
0.0
66.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
15857
Scott Rd
162.0
0.0
66.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
15687
Clinton Keith Rd
156.7
0.0
68.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
9935
Los Alamos Rd
100.7
0.0
67.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
6061
Murrieta Hot Springs
60.7
0.0
68.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
19
7036
1-215 / 1-15 NB Split
70.7
0.0
67.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total
160123
1688.7
0.0
64.7
0.0
5.3
46.3
1-215 PM-SB- Study Stats
TABLE 8
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
RAW DATA - FLOATING CAR RUN - I-215 PM NB
Node
#
1
Length
0
Node Names
1-215 / 1-15 NB Split
Travel
Time
# of
Stops
Avg
Speed
Time <=
0 MPH
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <=
30 MP
2
4589
Murrieta Hot Springs
87.3
0.3
35.8
0.0
6.0
42.0
3
6079
Los Alamos Rd
125.0
0.3
33.2
0.0
4.7
65.7
4
9780
Clinton Keith Rd
148.3
0.0
45.0
0.0
0.0
29.3
1 5
15886
Scott Rd
198.0
0.0
54.7
0.0
0.0
8.0
6
15968
Newport Rd
154.3
0.0
70.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
7
12043
McCall Blvd
120.7
0.0
68.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
10105
Ethanac Rd
155.7
0.3
44.3
1.0
7.0
66.3
9
4113
SR-74 East
41.3
0.0
67.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
14652
SR-74 West/4th St
154.3
0.0
64.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
5518
D St
59.0
0.0
63.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
3252
Nuevo Rd
33.0
0.0
67.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
16036
Ramona Expy
155.0
0.0
70.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
7945
Oleander Ave
80.0
0.0
67.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
9268
Van Buren Blvd
95.3
0.0
66.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
8394
Cactus Ave/March ARB
84.3
0.0
67.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
3303
E. Alessandro Blvd
32.7
0.0
68.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
5423
Eucalyptus/Eastridge Ave
70.0
0.0
52.8
0.0
3.7
14.7
19
5136
SR-60
210.3
1.7
16.6
1.0
32.3
205.3
Total 157490
2004.7
2.7
53.6
2.0
53.7
431.3
1-215 PM -NB- Study Stats
TABLE 9
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
RAW DATA - FLOATING CAR RUN - SL
Node
#
1
Length
0
Node Names
SR-74
Travel
Time
# of
Stops
Avg
Speed
Time <=
0 MPH
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <
30 MP
2
13056
Simpson Rd (Stop Sign)
222.0
1.3
40.1
1.7
33.3
55.3
3
3974
Domenigioni Pkwy
99.7
0.7
27.2
16.7
21.7
49.0
4
6566
Construction Rd
95.0
0.0
47.1
0.0
0.0
10.3
5
13923
Scott Rd/Washington St
204.3
0.7
46.5
0.0
6.0
34.3
6
8488
Abelia St
117.7
0.0
49.2
0.0
0.0
1.7
7
2292
Pourroy Rd
29.0
0.0
53.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
7677
Leon/Thompson
259.7
1.7
20.2
121.3
138.3
169.3
9
2943
Benton Rd
47.0
0.0
42.7
_0.0
1.0
8.3
10
4284
Auld RdNia Mira Mosa
63.7
0.3
45.9
3.0
7.7
10.7
11
2371
La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way
39.7
0.3
40.8
0.0
2.7
11.3
12
2671
Hunter Rd/Bore) Rd
61.7
0.7
29.5
10.7
17.3
29.0
13
3001
Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr
41.3
0.0
49.5
0.0
0.0
3.0
14
3022
Murrieta Hot Springs
79.3
0.7
26.0
28.0
34.0
42.3
15
1056
Winchester Square/Frontage Dr
38.3
0.3
18.8
13.7
16.3
24.0
16
986
Willows/Winchester Creek
32.3
0.3
20.8
4.3
12.7
20.0
17
3020
Nicolas Rd
46.0
0.0
44.8
0.0
0.0
3.0
18
2405
Poripaugh
45.7
0.3
35.9
0.7
3.7
13.0
19
1244
Margarita Rd
56.0
1.3
15.1
3.7
22.0
49.3
20
1204
Margarita Meadows/Promenade Mall
22.3
0.0
36.8
0.0
0.0
1.3
21
1165
Promenade Mali W.
30.0
0.3
26.5
2.0
6.0
14.0
22
1157
Ynez Rd
126.7
1.7
6.2
76.7
94.7
121.0
23
777
1-15 NB Ramps
19.0
0.0
27.9
0.0
0.0
12.7
t3726Z
1776.3
10.7
33.5
282.3
417.3
683.0
SR-79 (N) AM-SB- Study Stats
TABLE 10
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
Node
#
7
Length
D
RAW DATA - FLOATING
Node Names
1-15 NB Ramps
CAR
Travel
Time
RUN
# of
Stops
- SR 79
Avg
Speed
AM.
Time <=
0 MPH
NB
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <I-
30 MPI
2
- 850
- Ynez Rd
19.3.
0.0
30.0
0.0
0.0
10.3
3
408
Prominade Mall W.
8.0
0.0
34.8
0.0
0.0
3.7
4
1144
Margarita Meadows/Promenade Mall
20.3
0.0
38.4
0.0
0.0
0.3
5
1152
Margarita Rd
61.3
0.7
12.8
' 32.0
37.7
- 47.7
6
1328
Poripaugh
33.0
0.3
27.4
0.0
3.0
18.3
7
2409
- Nicolas Rd
135.3
1.0
12.1
78.3
88.0
103.0
8
3024
- Willows/Winchester Creek
46.3
0.0
- 44.5
0.0
0.0
3.7
9
988
Winchester Square/Frontage Dr
20.0
0.0
33.7
0.0
0.0
5.7
10
1016
Murrieta Hot Springs
33.0
0.3
21.0
11.0
14.0
18.0
11
- 3061
Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr
47.0.
0.0
44.4
0.0
0.0
4.7
12
3019
Hunter Rd/Bore) Rd
54.0
0.3
38.1
0.0
3.7
17.0
13
2671
La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way
42.7
0.0
42.7
0.0
0.0
0.7
14
2411
Auld RdNia Mira Mosa
55.0
0.3
29.9
17.7
20.3
25.0
15
4217
Benton Rd
54.3
0.0
52.9
0.0
0.0
0.3
16
2936
Leon/Thompson
100.0
0.7
20.0
50.0
55.7
63.0
17
7704
Pourroy Rd
107.0
0.0
49.1
0.0
- 0.0
-5.3
18
2292
Abelia St
31.0
0.0
50.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
19
8512
Scott Rd/Washington St
149.0
1.3
39.0
17.0
27.3
39.3
20
13911
Construction Rd
167.0
0.0
56.8
0.0
0.0
1.7
21
6532
Domenigioni Pkwy
103.7
0.3
43.0
20.0
22.3
25.3
22
4014
Simpson Rd (Stop Sign)
- 71.0
0.0
38.5
0.0
2.7
12.7
23
12998
SR-74
204.7
0.7
43.3
6.3
12.0
37.7
Total 86597
1563.0
6.0
37.8
232.3
• 286.7
443.3
SR-79 (N) AM -NB- Study Stats
TABLE 11
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
Node
fx
1
Length
0
RAW DATA - FLOATING
Node Names
SR-74
CAR
Travel
Time
RUN
0 of
Stops
- SR 79
Avg
Speed
PM
Time <_
0 MPH
SB
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <
30 MPH
2
13033
Simpson Rd (Stop Sign)
194.7
1.0
45.6
3.3
12.7
25.3
3
4007
Domenigioni Pkwy
74.7
0.3
36.6
6.7
8.7
16.3
4
6538
Construction Rd
86.7
0.0
51.4
0.0
0.0
1.0
5
13952
Scott Rd/Washington St
182.7
0.3
52.1
4.0
_ 6.7
10.3
6
8434
Abelia St
114.3
0.0
50.3
0.0
0.0
5.3
7
2283
Pourroy Rd
29.7
0.0
52.5
0.0
0.0
1.0
8
7728
Leon/Thompson
148.0
1.0
35.6
34.3.
39.3
53.7
9
2917
Benton Rd
46.0
0.0
43.2
0.0
0.0
4.7
10
4244
Auld RdAna Mira Mosa
67.0
0.3
43.2
4.7
6.3
. 12.3
11
2409
La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way
48.0
0.3
34.2
7.0
8.7
14.0
12
2655
Hunter Rd/Borel Rd
57.3
0.3
31.6
6.0
9.7
23.0
13
2975
Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr
68.3
- 0.7
29.7
10.3
16.7
27.0
14
3077
Murrieta Hot Springs
67.3
0.3
31.2
15.3
21.0
27.3
15
1016
Winchester Square/FrontageDr
23.3
0.3
29.7
0.0
2.7
13.0
16
935
Willows/WinchesterCreek
34.3
0.3
18.6
10.3
14.7
23.7
17
3080
Nicolas Rd
64.3
0.3
32.6
2.0
5.3
21.7
18
2362
Poripaugh
88.7
1.7
18.2
20.7
38.7
61.0
19
1261
Margarita Rd
109.0
2.0
7.9
48.7
76.0
105.7
I 20
1200
Margarita Meadows/Promenade Mall
31.3
0.0
26.1
0.0
1.3
24.0
21
1171
Prominade Mall W.
22.7
0.0
35.2
0.0
0.0
2.0
22
1183
Ynez Rd
86.3
1.0
9.3
39.3
58.0
75.3
23
655
1-15 NB Ramps
52.0
2.0
8.6
3.3
33.0
51.7
Total 87115
1696.7
12.3
35.0
216.0
358.3
599.3
SR-79 (N) PM-SB- Study Stats
TABLE 12
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
RAW DATA - FLOAT NG CAR RUN - SR 79 PM NB
Node
#
1
Length
0
Node Names
1-15 NB Ramps
Travel
Time
# of
Stops
Avg
Speed
Time <=
0 MPH
Time <=
10 MPH
Time <_
30 MPH
2
833
Ynez Rd
29.3
0.3
19.4
2.3
5.7
25.0
3
1238
Prominade Mall W.
52.7
0.7
16.0
18.7
23.3
39.3
4
1155
Margarita Meadows/Promenade Mall
21.3
0.0
36.9
0.0
0.0
1.0
5
1194
Margarita Rd
- 91.7
1.7
8.9
-42.0
62.3
81.0-
6
1326
Poripaugh
69.7
0.7
13.0
- - 28.3
35.3
58.3_
7
2418
Nicolas Rd
76.0
1.3
21.7
14.3
27.3
- 47.7
8
3055
Willows/Winchester Creek
104.3
1.3
20.0
37.3
50.0
63.0
9
993
Winchester SguarelFrontage Dr
23.0
0.0
29.4
0.0
0.0
13.7
10
1025
Murrieta Hot Springs
28.3
0.3
24.7
- 0.7
4.0
18.7
11
3087
Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr
91.3
0.7
23.0
29.3
36.7
49.0
12
3054
Hunter Rd/Bore) Rd
56.7
0.3
36.7
4.3
7.0
13.0
13
2654
- La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way
39.7
0.0
45.6
0.0
0.0
4.0
14
2410
Auld RdNia Mira Mosa
36.3
0.0
45.2
0.0
0.0
3.7"
15
4247
- Benton Rd
56.7
0.0
51.1
0.0
- 0.0
2.0
16
2955
- Leon/Thompson
64.3
0.3
31.3
8.3
11.7
25.3
17
7769
Pourroy Rd
162.0
0.7
32.7
25.3
35.7
' 62.3
.18
2321
Abelia St
27.7
0.0
- 57.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
19
8581
Scott Rd/Washington St
145.0
- 0.7
40.3
4.0
9.3
43.3"
20
14055
Construction Rd
201.0
0.0
47.7
0.0
- 0.3
9.3
21
6552
Domenigioni Pkwy
128.3
0.7
34.8
21.3
25.7
36.3
, 22
4071
Simpson Rd (Stop Sign)
110.0
1.0
25.2
21.0
32.0
52.7
23
13101
SR-74
206.3
0.7
43.3
2.7
-13.7
30.7
Total 88094
1821.7
11.3
33.0
260.0
380.0
79.
SR-79 (N) PM -NB- Study Stats
TABLE 13
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
RAW
Node
#
1
Length
0
DATA - FLOATING
Node Names
SR-91
CAR
Travel
Time
RUN
# of
Stops
- ALESSANDRO
Av
Spee
Time <=
0 MPH
AM
Time <=
10 MPH
EB
Time <
30 MP
2
3911
Victoria
95.7.
0.3
27.9
19.7
23.3
35.7
1 3
2338
Falkirk
44.3
0.3
36.0
0.0
3.0
8.0
4
3191
Glenhaven
55.0
0.3
39.6
0.7
3.0
6.7
5
1413
Arlington/Chicago
75.7
1.0
12.7
36.3
44.7
59.3
6
3221
Century
63.7
0.3
34.5
10.0
14.7
20.0
7
1957
Via Vista
51.3
0.7
26.0
16.7
21.0
26.7
8
3477
Overland/Canyon Crest
54.0
0.0
43.9
0.0
0.0
7.0
9
2696
Communications Ctr
37.7
0.0
48.8
0.0
0.0
1.0
, 10
1504
Trautwein
63.3
1.0
16.2
25.0
34.7
48.0
, 11
1167
K-Mart/Ralphs
19.7
0.0
40.5
0.0
0.0
1.0
, 12
675
Mission Grove
15.0
0.3
30.7
0.7
2.0
7.7
13
669
Savon/La Fitness
68.0
1.7
6.7
30.7
58.3
62.0
14
552
Northrop
57.3
1.0
6.6
23.3
50.7
52.3
15
2080
Barton
97.7
1.7
14.5
17.0
60.3
78.7
16
681
Orangecrest Club
11.0
0.0
42.2
0.0
0.0
0.7
17
5907
Sycamore/Brown
74.0
0.0
64.4
0.0
0.0
3.0
18
797
1-15 SB Ramps
12.7
0.0
42.9
0.0
0.0
1.0
19
793
1-15
11.3
0.0
47.7
0.0
0.0
3.0
Total
37029
907.3
8.7
27.8
180.0
315.7
421.7
Alles AM-EB- Study Stats
TABLE 14
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
RAW
Node
#
1
DATA
Length
0
- FLOATING
Node Names
1-15
CAR
Travel
Time
RUN
# of
Stops
- ALESSANDRO
Av
Spee
Time <=
0 MPH
AM
Time <=
10 MPH
WB
Time <=
30 MPH
2
768
1-15 SB Ramps
15.0
0.0
34.9
0.0
0.0
5.3
3
5970
Sycamore/Brown
79.0
0.0
51.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
4
671
Orangecrest Club
19.7
0.7
23.3
1.7
5.7
14.0
5
2084
Barton
63.3
1.0
22.4
18.7
25.3
37.3
6
524
Northrop
11.7
0.0
30.6
0.0
0.0
4.3
7
666
Savon/La Fitness
34.0
0.7
13.4
8.0
15.7
29.7
8
679
Mission Grove
12.7
0.0
36.5
0.0
0.0
2.0
9
1113
K-Mart/Ralphs
42.0
0.7
18.1
14.0
18.7
30.7
10
1533
Trautwein
46.3
0.7
22.6
4.0
10.3
34.7
11
2656
Communications Ctr
79.3
0.7
22.8
10.3
15.3
51.0
12
3446
Overland/Canyon Crest
132.0
2.0
17.8
27.7
57.0
98.3
13
1980
Via Vista
107.0
1.7
12.6
35.0
52.0
95.0
14
3147
Century
135.3
1.7
15.9
32.7
65.3
115.0
15
1465
Arlington/Chicago
25.3
0.0
39.4
0.0
0.0
3.3
16
3214
Glenhaven
51.7
0.3
42.4
0.0
1.7
5.0
17
2274
Falkirk
143.7
1.3
10.8
63.7
94.0
122.7
18
3937
Victoria
99.3
1.0
27.0
10.7
25.7
49.7
j 19
703
SR-91
14.7
0.0
32.7
0.0
0.0
4.7
Total
36829
1112.0
12.3
22.6
226.3
376.7
702.7
Alles AM-WB- Study Stats
TABLE 15
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
RAW
Node
#
1
Length
0
DATA - FLOATING
Node Names
SR-91
CAR
Travel
Time
RUN
# of
Stops
- ALESSANDRO
Avg
Speed
Time <=
0 MPH
PM
Time <=
10 MPH
EB
Time <=
30 MPH
2
3931
Victoria
69.3
0.0
38.7
0.0
0.0
O.
3
2318
Falkirk
40.7
0.0
38.9
0.0
0.0
2.0
4
3176
Glenhaven
219.0
5.0
9.9
37.7
158.7
192.3
5
1386
Arlington/Chicago
227.7
3.0
4.2
139.0
180.0
227.7
6
3239
Century
80.3
1.0
27.5
6.7
17.0
39.3
7
1961
Via Vista
39.7
0.0
33.7
0.0
1.3
9.7
j 8
3474
Overland/Canyon Crest
66.3
0.0
35.7
0.0
0.7
16.
9
2670
Communications Ctr
46.7
0.0
39.0
0.0
0.7
6.3
10
1512
Trautwein
37.3
0.0
27.6
0.0
2.7
20.3
11
1183
K-Mart/Ralphs
57.3
1.3
14.1
18.7
29.3
43.7
12
661
Mission Grove
37.0
0.7
12.2
15.0
21.0
28.7
13
670
Savon/La Fitness
11.7
0.0
39.2
0.0
0.0
0.3
14
541
Northrop
8.0
0.0
46.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
2096
Barton
28.3
0.0
50.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
665
Orangecrest Club
9.3
0.0
48.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
5892
Sycamore/Brown
89.3
0.0
45.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
18
870
1-15 SB Ramps
23.0
0.3
25.8
1.0
3.3
14.3
19
770
12.3
0.0
42.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total
37015
1103.3
11.3
22.9
218.0
414.7
607.7
Alles PM-EB- Study Stats
TABLE 16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
RAW
Node
#
1
Length
0
DATA - FLOATING
Node Names
1-15
CAR
Travel
Time
RUN
# of
Stops
- ALESSANDRO
Av
Speel
Time <=
0 MPH
PM
Time <=
10 MPH
WB
Time <
30 MP
2
751
1-15 SB Ramps
36.3
0.7
14.1
14.0
18.7
29.7
i 3
5977.
Sycamore/Brown
79.7
0.0
51.2
0.0
0.0
3.0
4
687
Orangecrest Club
10.3
0.0
45.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
2076
Barton
34.3
0.3
41.2
0.0
2.7
9.0
6
498
Northrop
9.7
0.0
35.1
0.0
0.0
2.7
7
692
Savon/La Fitness
27.7
0.7
17.1
3.7
9.0
23.3
8
622
Mission Grove
10.7
0.0
39.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
9
1182
K-Mart/Ralphs
17.3
0.0
46.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
1493
Trautwein
21.0
0.0
48.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
2652
Communications Ctr
37.3
0.0
48.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
3468
Overland/Canyon Crest
51.3
0.0
46.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
1971
Via Vista
28.7
0.0
46.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
3134
Century
140.3
2.3
15.2
31.7
67.0
116.3
15
1472
Arlington/Chicago
28.3
0.0
35.4
0.0
0.0
5.7
i 16
3219
Glenhaven
66.7
0.3
32.9
12.0
15.7
19.3
17
2255
Falkirk
39.0
0.0
39.4
0.0
0.0
0.3
18
3917
Victoria
102.7
1.0
26.0
17.7
29.3
50.3
j 19
831
SR-91
25.3
0.0
22.4
0.0
0.0
21.7
' Total
36897
766.7
5.3
32.8
79.0
142.3
281.3
Alias PM-WB- Study Stats
A 1 13 I C I 0 1 E I F 1 1 I J
1
FLOATING
Roadway Classification
Length
0
TABLE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
CAR RUN RESULTS • 1.15,1.215,
Segment
SR-795 NB Ramp
17
CMP
SR
79,-& ALESSANDRO
Direction
NB
Peak Hour
AM
Speed
Floating Car
Count LOS
2
3
a
5
Roadway
6
1-15
Freeway
7
1-15
Freeway
7860
Rancho California Rd
NB
AM
68.5
C
8
1-15
Freeway
16946
Winchester Rd
NB
AM
70.7
B
9
1-15
Freeway
14044
1-215/1-15 split
NB
AM
72.8
B
10
1-15
Freeway
10208
Mumeta Hot Springs Rd
NB
AM
74.5
B
11
1-15
Freeway
4086
California Oaks/Kalmia St
NB
AM
69.7
C
12
1-15
Freeway
7373
Clinton Kieth Rd
NB
AM
71.8
B
13
1.15
Freeway
6021
Baxter Rd
NB
AM
73.8
B
14
1-15
Freeway
8631
Bundy Canyon Rd
NB
AM
72.1
B
15
1-15
Freeway
4628
Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr
NB
AM
71.1
B
16
1-15
Freeway
5420
Main St
NB
AM
70.3
B
17
1-15
Freeway
6086
Central Ave
N13
AM
71.1
B
18
1-15
Freeway
12579
Nichols Rd
NB
AM
71.0
B
19
1-15
Freeway
15029
Lake St
NB
AM
70.8
B
20
1-15
Freeway
19641
Indian Truck Trail
NB
AM
71.2
B
21
1-15
Freeway
14926
Temescal Canyon Rd
NB
AM
52.0
22
1-15
Freeway
8316
Weirick Rd
NB
AM
19.8
F
23
1-15
Freeway
6821
Cajalco Rd
NB
AM
24.9
F
24
1-15
Freeway
9373
EI Cerrito Rd
NB
AM
43.0
F
25
1-15
Freeway
14997
Ontario Rd
NB
AM
63.2
0
26
1-15
Freeway
6603
Magnolia Ave
NB
AM
51.7
F
27
1-15
Freeway
7639
SR-91
NB
AM
64.3
D
28
1.15
Freeway
15959
Hidden Valley Pkwy
. NB
AM
39.8
F
29
- 1-15
Freeway
5921
2nd St
NB
AM
17.1
F
30
1-15
Freeway
3999
6th St
NB
AM
31.6
F
31
1-15
Freeway
11042
Limonite Ave
NB
AM
36.9
F
32
1-15
Freeway
8686
SR-60
NB
AM
53.4
E
33
34
1-15
Freeway
6294
0
Jumpa St off ramp
Jurupa St off ramp
NB
SB
AM
AM
43.1
35
I 1-15
Freeway
36
1-15
Freeway
7860
SR-60
SB
AM
AM
50.5
70.6
B
37
1-15
Freeway
16946
Limonite Ave
SB
38
1-15
Freeway
14044
6th St
SB
AM
67.9
D
39
I-15
Freeway
10208
2nd St
SB
AM
66.5
D
40
1-15
Freeway
4086
Hidden Valley Pkwy
SB
AM
68.6
C
41
1-15
Freeway
7373
SR-91
SB
AM
68.6
C
42
1-15
Freeway
6021
Magnolia Ave
SB
AM
69.0
C
43
1-15
Freeway
8631
Ontario Rd
SB
AM
67.7
D
44.
1-15
Freeway
4628 +
El Cerrito Rd
SB
AM
68.0
D
45
1-15
Freeway
5420
Cajalco Rd
SB
AM
70.5
B
46
1-15
Freeway
6086
Weirick Rd
SB
AM
69.1
C
47
1-15
Freeway
12579
Temescal Canyon Rd
SB
AM
68.9
C
48
1-15
Freeway
15029
Indian Truck Trail
SB
AM
68.3
C
49
1-15
Freeway
19641
Lake St
SB
AM
71.3
B
50
1-15
Freeway
14926
Nichols Rd
SB
AM
70.2
B
51
1-15
Freeway
8316
Central Ave
SB
AM
69.1
C
52
1-15
Freeway
6821
Main St
SB
AM
68.5 •
C
53
1-15
Freeway
9373
Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr
SB
AM
67.0
D
54
1-15
Freeway
14997
Bundy Canyon Rd
SB
AM
69.3
C
55
1-15
Freeway
6603
Baxter Rd
SB
AM
73.1
B
56
1-15
Freeway
7639
Clinton Kieth Rd
SB
AM
70.5
B
57
1-15
Freeway
15959
California Oaks/Kalmia St
SB
AM
68.9
C
58
1-15
Freeway
5921
Murreta Hot Springs Rd -
SB
AM
69.8
C
59
1-15
Freeway
3999
1-215/1-15 split
SB
AM
69.7
C
60
1-15
Freeway
11042
Winchester Rd
SB
AM
66.7
D
61
1-15
Freeway
8686
Rancho California Rd
SB
AM
68.9
C
62
63
. 1-15
Freeway
6294
0
SR-796 SB Ramp
SR-79S NB Ramp
SB
NB
AM
PM
60.2
t
�-
64
1-15
Freeway
65
1-15
Freeway
7060
Rancho Califomia Rd
NB
PM
30.3
66
1-15
Freeway
8672
Winchester Rd
NB
PM
27.0
F
E
67
1-15
Freeway
11266
1-215/1-15 split
NB
PM
53.6
68
1-15
Freeway
3709
Murriela Hot Springs Rd
NB
PM
71.6
B
69
1-15
Freeway
6034
California Oaks/Kalmia St
NB
PM
71.3
B
70
1-15
Freeway
15984
Clinton Kieth Rd
NB
PM
68.1
C
71
1-15
Freeway
7528
Baxter Rd
NB
PM
69.4 "
C
72
1-15
Freeway
6486
Bundy Canyon Rd
NB
PM
67.0
D
73
1-15
Freeway
15204
Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr
NB
PM
67.6
D
74
1-15
Freeway
9384
Main St
NB
PM
68.6
C
75
1-15
Freeway
6834
Central Ave
NB
PM
72.1
B
Page 1 of 5
A I B I C 1 D I E I F I f I J
1
TABLE 17
2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
3
FLOATING CAR RUN RESULTS-1-15,1-215, SR
79, & ALESSANDRO
4
Roadway Roadway Classification Length - Segment
Direction Peak Hour Speed
Floating Car
5
Count LOS
76
1-15
Freeway
8282
Nichols Rd
NB
PM
71.2
B
77
1-15
Freeway
15043
Lake St
NB
PM
70.4
B
78
1-15
Freeway
19516
Indian Truck Trail
NB
PM
70.8
B
79
1-15
Freeway
15031
Temescal Canyon Rd
NB
PM
68.5
C
80
1-15
Freeway
12587
WeirickRd
NB-
PM
38.0
81
1-15
Freeway
6076
Cajalco Rd
NB .
PM
40.7
F
82
1-15
Freeway
5396
El Cerrito Rd
NB
PM
58.1
E
83
1-15
Freeway
4560
Ontario Rd
NB
PM
63.5
D
134
1-15
Freeway
8686
Magnolia Ave
NB
PM
65.8
D
85
1-15
Freeway
6017
SR-91
NB
PM
55.2
E
86
1-15
Freeway
7338
Hidden Valley Pkwy
NB
PM
28.9
87
• 1-15
Freeway
4073
2nd St
NB
PM
29.9
F
88
1-15
Freeway
10276
6th St
NB
PM
40-7
F
89
1-15
Freeway
14006
Limonite Ave
NB
PM
48.6
F
90
1-15
Freeway
16841
SR-60
NB
PM .
66.2
D
91
1-15
hreeway
8348
Jurupa St off ramp
NB
PM
39.6
92
93
1-15
Freeway
0
Jumpa St off ramp
SB
PM
94
1-15
Freeway
7860
SR-60
SB
PM
.32.2
95
1-15
Freeway
16946
Limonite Ave
SB
PM
38.9
F
96
1.15
Freeway
14044
6th St
SB
PM
52.7
F
97
1.15
Freeway
10208
2nd St
SB
PM
57.0
E
98
1.15
Freeway
4086
Hidden Valley Pkwy
SB
PM
66.3 .
D
99
I 1-15
• Freeway
7373
SR-91
SB
PM
66.1
D
100
1 1-15
Freeway
6021
Magnolia Ave
SB
PM
42.2
101
; 1-15
Freeway
8631
Ontario Rd
SB
PM
19.8
F
102
I 1-15
Freeway
4628
El Cerrito Rd
SB
PM
25.4
F
103
1 1-15
Freeway
5420
Cajalco Rd
SB
PM
56.9
E
104
1-15
Freeway
6086
Weirick Rd
SB
PM
63.8
D
105
! 1-15
Freeway
12579
Temescal Canyon Rd
SB
PM
64.2
D
106
I 1-15
Freeway
15029
Indian Truck Trail
SB
PM
70.2
B
107
1-15
Freeway
19641
Lake St
SB
PM
71-0
B
108
1 1-15
Freeway -
14926
Nichols Rd
SB
PM
72.0
B
109
1-15
Freeway
8316
Central Ave
SB
PM
71-5
B
110
1-15
Freeway
6821
Main St
SB
PM
70.5
B
111
1-15
Freeway
9373
Railroad Canyon/Diamond Dr
SB
PM
69.5
C
112
1-15
Freeway
14997
Bundy Canyon Rd
SB
PM
70.5 '
B
113
1-15
Freeway
6603
Baxter Rd
SB
PM
69.3
C
114
1-15
Freeway
7639
Clinton Kieth Rd
SB
PM
69.1
C
115
1-15
Freeway
15959
Caldomia Oaks/Kalmia St
SB
PM
69.5
C
116
1-15
Freeway
5921
Mumieta Hat Springs Rd
SB
PM
70.4
B
117
1-15
Freeway
3999
1-215/1-15 split
SB
PM
71.8
B
118
1.15
Freeway
11042
Winchester Rd
SB
PM
69.7
C
119
1-15
Freeway
8686
Rancho California Rd
SB
PM
70.2
B
120
1-15
Freeway
6294
SR-79S SB Ramp
-
PM
64.4
D
721
c
w ^..
f
s i,. } '� 'ss
r'°4 z '•'r „u a 'ah.,'zi.an^-..; �*''x<
_ " t�
�
t - €
� -
-
122
1-215
Freeway
0
1-215 / 1-15 NB Split
NB
AM
123
1-215
Freeway
4583
Murdeta Hot Springs
NB
AM
71.0 -
B
124
1-215
Freeway
6084
Los Alamos Rd
NB
AM
69.9
C
125
1-215
Freeway
9769
Clinton Keith Rd
NB
AM
62.4
D
126
1-215
Freeway
15884
Scott Rd
NB
AM
70.2
B
127
1-215
Freeway
15964
Newport Rd
NB
AM
72.9
B
128
1-215
Freeway
12046
McCall Blvd
NB
AM
69.2
C
129
1-215
Freeway
10133
Ethanac Rd
NB
AM
39.0
F
130
1-215
Freeway
4075
SR-74 East
NB
AM
25.6
F
131
1-215
Freeway
14689
SR-74 West/4th St
NB
AM
43.2
F
132
1-215
Freeway
5548
D St
NB
AM
65.2
D
133
1-215
Freeway
3233
Nuevo Rd
NB
AM
67.5
C
134
1-215
Freeway
16075
Ramona Expy
NB
AM
71.5
B
135
1-215
Freeway
7908
Oleander Ave
NB
AM
70.0
B
136
1-215
Freeway
9258
Van Buren Blvd
NB
AM
65.1
C
137
1-215
Freeway
8426
Cactus Ave/March ARB
NB
AM
70.6
B
138
1-215
Freeway
3300
E. Alessandro BNd
NB
AM
64.9
E
139
I-215
Freeway
5401
EucalyptuslEastndgeAve
NB
AM
8.8
140
- 1-215
Freeway
50/8
SH-60
NB
AM
10.6
F
141
Freeway
0
SR-60
SB
AM��
142
1-215
143
1-215
Freeway
5197
Eucalyptus/Eastridge Ave
SB
AM
• 64.0
D
144
_ 1-215
Freeway
5465
E. Alessandro Blvd
SB
AM
72.6
B
145
1-215
Freeway
3462
Cactus Ave/March ARB
SB
AM
70.1
B
Page 2 of 5
A I B 1 C 1 D 1 E 1 F 1 1 1 J
1
FLOATING
Roadway Classification
Freeway
Length
8324
TABLE 17
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
CAR RUN RESULTS-1.15,1.215, SR
Segment
Van Buren Blvd
79, & ALESSANDRO
Direction
SB
Peak Hour
AM
Speed
70.6
Floating Car
Count LOS
2
3
4
5
146
Roadway
1-215
B
147
1-215
Freeway
9754
Oleander Ave
SB
AM
70.5
B
148
1-215
Freeway
7430
Ramona Expy
SB
AM
68.8
C
149
1-215
Freeway
15950
Nuevo Rd
SB
AM
69.3
C
150
1-215
Freeway
4080
D St
SB
AM
65.7
D
151
1-215
Freeway
4800
SR-74 West/4th St
SB
AM
69.1
C
152
1-215
Freeway
14648
SR-74 East
SB
AM
67.9
D
153
1-215
Freeway
3995
Ethanac Rd
SB
AM
66.4
D
154
1-215
Freeway
10137
McCall Blvd ,
SB
AM
67.3
D
155
I-215
Freeway
12250
Newport Rd
SB
AM
53.1
156
1-215
Freeway
15863
Scott Rd
SB
AM
38.6
F
157
1-215
Freeway
15832
Clinton Keith Rd -
SB
AM
50.7
F
158
1-215
Freeway
9812
Los Alamos Rd
SB
AM
68.3
C
159
1-215
Freeway
6007
Murrieta Hot Springs
SB
AM
64.0
D
160
161
162
1-215
• 1-215
Freeway
Freeway
, /102
0
1-215 / 1-15 NB Split
1-215 / I-15 NB Split
SB
NB�
AM
PM
60.8
E
163
1-215
Freeway
4589
Murrieta Hot Springs
NB
PM
35.8
164
1-215
Freeway
6079
Los Alamos Rd
NB
PM
33.2
F
165
1-215
Freeway
9780
Clinton Keith Rd
NB
PM
45.0
F
166
1-215
Freeway
15886
Scott Rd
NB
PM
54.7
E
167
1-215
Freeway
15968
Newport Rd
NB
PM
70.5
B
168
1-215
Freeway
12043
McCall Blvd
NB
PM
68.0
169
1-215
Freeway
10105
Ethanac Rd
NB
PM
44.3
170
V215
Freeway
4113
SR-74 East
NB
PM
67.8
D
171
1-215
Freeway
14652
SR-74 Wes1/4th St
NB
PM
64.7
D
172
1-215
Freeway
5518
D St
NB -
PM -
63.8
D
173
1-215
Freeway
3252
- Nuevo Rd
NB
PM
67.2
D -
174
I-215
Freeway
16036
Ramona Expy
NB
PM
70.5
B
175
1-215
Freeway
7945
Oleander Ave
NB
PM
67.7
D
176
V215 -
Freeway
9268
Van Buren Blvd
NB
PM
66.3
D
177
1.215
Freeway
8394
Cactus Ave/March ARB
NB
PM
67.9
D
178
I-215
Freeway
3303
E. Alessandro Blvd
NB
PM
68.9
C
179
1-215
Freeway
5423
Eucalyptus/EastridgeAve
NB
PM
52.8
180
181
1-215
;:,.,,..k.�, 1
Freeway
4: rv[I "a<t.,...at
Freeway
5136
wL',3;�Z':3''r➢'.x�.�``
0
SR-60
a�-..a.�,.?_, `!-'E�,-s.a.. �,�.tn:.�'..��fi
SR-60
NB
�. a13
SB
PM
�.,.�,.... ..
PM
16.6
... x'
F
x'_'.
182
1-215
183
1-215
Freeway
5288
Eucayptus/Eastridge Ave
SB
PM
58.8
E
184
1-215
Freeway
5392
E. Alessandro Blvd
SB
PM
68.5
C
185
I-215
Freeway
3488
Cactus Ave/March ARB
SB
PM
68.6
C
186
I-215
Freeway
8336
Van Buren Blvd
SB
PM
68.2
C
187
I-215
Freeway
9742
Oleander Ave
SB
PM
64.1
D
188
1-215
Freeway
7345
Ramona Expy
SB
PM
65.6
D
189
1-215
Freeway
16030
Nuevo Rd
SB
PM
55.1
E
190
1-215
Freeway
4057
D St
SB
PM
65.9
a
191
1-215
Freeway
4847
SR-74 West/4th St
SB
PM
63.6
D
192
1-215
Freeway
14583
SR-74 East
SB
PM
61.0
E
193
1-215
Freeway
4052
Ethanac Rd
SB
PM
67.9
D
194
1-215
Freeway
10164
McCall Blvd
SB
PM
67.3
D
195
1-215
Freeway
12223
Newport Rd
SB
PM
66.1
D
196
I-215
Freeway
15857
Scott Rd
SB
PM
66.7
D
197
, 1-215
Freeway
15687
Clinton Keith Rd
SB
PM
68.3
C
198
1-215
Freeway
9935
Los Alamos Rd
SB
PM
67.3
D
199'
1-215
Freeway
6061
Murrieta Hot Springs
SB
PM
68.1
D
200
201
1-215
SR-79
Freeway
Arterial
/036
�
0
1-215 / 1-15 NB Split
p
1-15 NB Ramps
SB
NB
PM
AM
6/.9
D
202
203
SR-79
Arterial
1016
Murrieta Hot Springs
NB .
AM
28.3
C
204
SR-79
Arterial
3061
Robert Trent Jones/TechnologyDr
NB
AM
44.4
B
205
SR-79
Arterial
3019
Hunter Rd/Borel Rd
NB
AM
38.1
B
208
SR-79
Arterial
2671.
La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way
NB
AM '
42.7
B
207
SR-79
Arterial
2411
Auld Rya Mira Masa
NB
AM
29.9
C
208
SR-79
Arterial
4217
Benton Rd
NB
AM
52.9
B
209
SR-79
Arterial
2936
LeonlThompson
NB
AM
20.0
E
210
SR-79
Arterial
7704
Pounoy Rd
NB
AM
49.1
B
211
SR-79
Arterial
2292
Abefia St
NB
AM
50.4
B
212
SR-79
Arterial
8512
Scott Rd/Washinglan St
NB
AM
39.0
B
213
SR-79
Arterial
13911
Construction Rd
NB
AM
56.8
B
214
SR-79
Arterial
6532
Domenigioni Pkwy
NB
AM
43.0
B
215
51449
Arterial
4014
Simpson Rd (Stop Sign)
NB
AM
38.5
B
Page 3 of 5
A I B J C I D I E I F I 1 I J
1
FLOATING
Roadway Classification Length
TABLE 17
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
CAR RUN RESULTS-1.15,1.215, SR
Segment
SR-74
SR-74
79, & ALESSANDRO
Direction
NB
SB�
Peak Hour
AM
Speed
43.3
Floating Ca
Count LOS
B
2
3
4
5
216
217
218
Roadway
SR-79
SR79
Arterial
Arterial
12998
0
AM
219
SR-79
Arterial
13056
Simpson Rd (Stop Sign)
SB
AM
40.1
B
220
SR-79
Arterial
3974
Domenigioni Pkwy
- SB
AM
27.2
D
221
SR-79
Arterial
6566
Construction Rd
SB
AM
47.1
8
222
SR-79
Arterial
13923
Scott RdNVashington St
SB
AM
46.5
B
223
SR-79
Arterial
8488
Abelia St
SB
AM
49.2
B
224
SR-79
Arterial
2292
Pourroy Rd
SB
AM
53.9
B
225
SR-79
, Arterial
7677
Leon/Thompson
SB
AM.
202 '
E
226
SR-79
Arterial
2943
Benton Rd
SB
AM
42.7
B
227
SR-79
Arterial
4284
Auld RdNia Mira Mosa
SB
AM
45.9
B
228
, SR-79
Arterial
2371
La Alba Rd/Spar rman Way
SB
AM
40.8
B
229
! SR-79
Arterial
2671
Hunter Rd/Borel Rd
SB
AM
29.5
C
230
I SR-79
Arterial
3001
Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr
SB
AM
49.5
B
231
I SR-79
Arterial
3022
Murrieta Hot Springs
SB
AM
26.0
D
232
233"'`
234
I SR79
SR-79
Arterial
Arterial
/7/
0
1-15 NB Ramps
1-15 NB Ramps
SB
NB
AM
PM
25.8
D
235
SR-79
Arterial
1025
Munieta Hot Springs
NB
PM
21.1
E
2361,
SR-79
Arterial
3087
Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr
NB
PM
23.0
0
237
I SR-79
Arterial
3054
Hunter Rd/Borel Rd
NB
PM
36.7
B
238
I SR-79
Arterial
2654
La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way
NB
PM
45.6
B
239
I SR-79
Arterial
2410
Auld Rd/Via Mira Mosa
NB
PM
45.2
B
240
! SR-79
Arterial
4247
Benton Rd
NB
PM
51.1
B
241
1 SR-79
Arterial
2955
Leon/Thompson
NB
PM
31.3
C
242
, SR-79
Arterial
7769
Pourroy Rd
NB
PM
32.7
C
243
1 SR-79
Arterial
2321
Abelia St
NB
PM
57.2
B
244
I SR-79
Arterial
8581
Scott Rd/VVashington St
NB
PM
40.3
B
245
I SR-79
Arterial
14055
Construction Rd
NB
PM
47.7
B
246
' SR-79
Arterial
6552
Domenigioni Pkwy
NB
PM
34.8
C
247
SR-79
Arterial
4071
Simpson Rd (Stop Sign)
NB
PM
25.2
D
248
249
250
Sk-
SR-79
rn1
Arterial
0
SR-74
SR-74
NB
SB
PM
PM
43.3
B
251
SR-79
Arterial
13033
Simpson Rd (Stop Sign)
- SB
PM
45.6
B
252
, SR-79
Arterial
4007
Domenigioni Pkwy
SB
PM
36.6 •
B
253
SR-79
Arterial
6538
Construction Rd
SB
PM
51.4
B
254
SR-79
Arterial
13952.
Scott RdNVashington St
SB
PM
52.1
B
255
SR-79
Arterial
8434
Abelia St
SB
PM
50.3
B
256
SR-79
Arterial
2283
Pourroy Rd
SB
PM
52.5
B
257
SR-79
Arterial
7728
Leon/Thompson
SB
PM
35.6
B
258
SR-79 •
Arterial
2917
Benton Rd
SB
PM
43.2
B
259
SR-79
Arterial
4244
Auld Rd/Va Mira Mosa
SB
PM
43.2
B
260
SR-79
Arterial
2409
La Alba Rd/Sparkman Way
SB
PM
34.2
C
261
SR-79
Arterial
2655
Hunter Rd/Borel Rd
SB
PM
31.6
C
262
SR-79
Arterial
2975
Robert Trent Jones/Technology Dr
SB
PM
29.7
C
263
SR-79
Arterial
3077
Mumeta Hot Springs
SB
PM
31.2
C
264
285 a
266
SKl9
`^:-
Alessandro
Artenal
z
:`�.�:_ r 4.� .,.,...•.
Arterial
655
�. c.' "�&a�3.�
0
1-15 NB Ramps
�? s°'m�_:`�_ ._d; � ��* "';.�,�-4 ..�i.� �,'��
SB
._. + ��'a_
EB
PM
_.� .-'_-..� _
AM
20.6
?:.5 ?- ' ,-
E
,. '.
SR-91
267
Alessandro
Arterial
3911
Victoria
EB
AM
27.9
D
268
Alessandro
Arterial
2338
Falkirk
EB
AM
36.0
8
269
Alessandro
Arterial
3191
Glenhaven
EB
AM
39.6
B
270
Alessandro
Arterial
1413 -
Ariington/Chicago
- EB
AM
12.7-
F
271
Alessandro
Arterial
3221
Century
EB
AM
34.5
C
272
Alessandro
Arterial
1957
Via Vista
EB
AM
26.0
D
273
Alessandro
Arterial
3477
Overland/Canyon Crest
EB
AM
. 43.9
8
274
Alessandro
Arterial
2696
Communications Ctt
EB
AM
48.8
8
275
Alessandro
Arterial
1504
Traulwein
EB
AM
16.2
F
276
Alessandro
Arterial
1167
K-Mart/Ralphs
EB
AM
40.5
B
277
Alessandro
Arterial
675
Mission Grove
EB
AM
303
C
278 Alessandro
279
280
281
282
283
Alessandro
Alessandro
Alessandro
Alessandro
Alessandro
284 Alessandro
285
rted
Arterial
Arterial
Arterial
Arterial
Arterial
Artenal
552
2080
681
5907
797
793
Savon/La Fitness
Northrop
Barton
Orangecrest Club
Sycamore/Brown
1-215 SB Ramps
1-215
Page 4 0f 5
EB
EB
EB
EB
EB
EB
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
6.7
6.6
14.5
42.2
54.4
42.9
47.7
B
B
A 1 B I C I D 1 E 1 F 1 I I J
1
TABLE 17
2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
3
FLOATING CAR RUN RESULTS-1.15,1-215, SR 79, & ALESSANDRO
4
Roadway Roadway Classificatio
Length Segment Direction Peak Hour
Speed
Floating Car
5
-
Count LOS
286
Alessandro
Arterial
0
1-215
WB
AM
287
Alessandro
Arterial
768
1-215 SB Ramps
WB
AM
34.9
C
288
Alessandro
Arterial
5970
Sycamore/Brown
WB
AM
51.5
B
289
Alessandro
Arterial
671
Orangecresl Club
WB
AM
23.3
D
290
Alessandro
Arterial
2084
Barton
WB
AM
22.4
D
291
Alessandro
Arterial
524
Northrop
WB
AM
30.6
C
292
Alessandro
Arterial
666
SavonlLa Fitness
WB
AM
13.4
F
293
Alessandro
Arterial
679
Mission Grove
WB
AM
36.5
B
294
Alessandro
Arterial
1113
K-MartlRalphs
- WB
AM
18.1
E
295
Alessandro
Arterial
1533
Trautwein
WB
AM
22.6
D
296
Alessandro
Arterial
2656
Communications Ctr
WB
AM
22.8
D
297
' Alessandro
Arterial
3445
Overland/Canyon Crest
WB
AM
17.8
E
298
Alessandro
Arterial
1980
Via Vista
WB
AM
12.6
299
Alessandro
Arterial
3147
Century
WB
AM
15.9
F
300
Alessandro
Arterial
1465
ArtingtonlChicago
WB
AM
39.4
B
301
Alessandro
Arterial
3214
Glehhaven
WB
AM
42.4
B
302
Alessandro
Arterial -
2274
Falkirk
WB
AM
10.8
F
303
Alessandro
Arterial
3937
Victoria
WB
AM
27.0
D
304
Alessandro
Artenal
703
SR-91
WB
AM
32.7
C
305
305
Alessandro
Arterial
0
SR-91
EB
PM
307
Alessandro
Arterial
3931
Victoria
EB
PM
38.7
B
308
Alessandro
Arterial
2318
Falkirk
EB
PM
38.9
B
309
Alessandro
Arterial
3176
Glenhaven
EB
PM
9.9
F
310
Alessandro
Arterial
1386
Arlington/Chicago
EB
PM
4.2
F
311
Alessandro
Arterial
3239
Century
EB
PM
27.5
D
312
Alessandro
Arterial
1961
Via Vista
EB
PM
33.7
C
313
Alessandro
Arterial
3474
Overland/Canyon Crest
EB
PM
35.7
B
314
I Alessandro
Arterial
2670
Communications Ctr
EB
PM
39.0
B
315
Alessandro
Arterial
1512
Trauhnwein
EB
- PM
27.6
D
316
Alessandro
Arterial
1183
K-MarflRalphs
EB
PM
14.1
317
Alessandro
Arterial
661
Mission Grove
EB
PM
12.2
F
318
Alessandro
Arterial
670
SavonlLa Fitness
EB
PM
39.2
B
319
Alessandro
Arterial
541
Northrop
EB
PM
46.1
B
320
, Alessandro
Arterial
2096
Barton
EB
PM
50.4
B
321
Alessandro
Arterial
665
Orangecrest Club
EB
PM
48.6
B
322
Alessandro
Arterial
5892
Sycamore/Brown
EB
PM
45.0
B
323
Alessandro
Arterial
870
1-215 SB Ramps
EB
PM
25.8
D
324
Alessandro
Artenal
770
1-215
tFi
PM
42.6
B
325
_ ., :.".
.-, ," ?..,".:,s.:;7a,a't+,:�`t3�:a.ir1Y,.-'^r<rta",�`,
-ss :a; »¢�wa �.�'=s `,,.,,
.:; r...iM *'v'9,e•i...,,s:
., ....a...
.._ ...
.. ,.. ;"�-'
326
Alessandro
Arterial
0
I-215
WB
PM
327
Alessandro
Arterial
751
1-215 SB Ramps
WB
PM
14.1
328
Alessandro
Arterial
5977
Sycamore/Brown
WB
PM
51.2
B
329
Alessandro
Arterial
687
Orangecrest Club
WB
PM
45.3
B
330
Alessandro
Arterial
2076
Barton
WB
PM
41.2
B
331
Alessandro
Arterial
498
Northrop
WB
PM
35.1
B
332
Alessandro
Arterial
692
SavonlLa Fitness
WB
PM
17.1
E
333
Alessandro
Arterial
622
kission Grove
WB
PM
39.8
B
334
Alessandro
Arterial
1182
K-MartlRalphs
WB
PM
46.5
B
335
Alessandro
Arterial
1493
Trautwein
WB
PM
48.5
B
336
Alessandro
Arterial
2652
Communications Clr
WB
PM
48A
B
337
' Alessandro
Arterial
3468
Overland/Canyon Crest
WB
PM
46.1
B
338
Alessandro
Arterial
1971
Ira Vista
WB
PM
46.9
B
339
Alessandro
Arterial
3134
Century
WB
PM
15.2
340
Alessandro
Arterial
1472
Arlington/Chicago
WB
PM
35.4
B
341
Alessandro
Arterial
3219
Glenhaven
WB
PM
32.9
C
342
Alessandro
Arterial
2255
Falkirk
WB
PM
39.4
B
343
Alessandro -
Arterial
3917
Victoria
WB
PM .
26.0
D
344
Alessandro
Artenal
831
SR-91
WB
PM
22.4
D
345
346
Borderline Areas
347
F
Deficient Areas
Page 5 of 5
TABLE 18
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CMP
FLOATING CAR RUN LOS DEFICIENCY RESULTS
Selected Segments of 1-15N-2151SR 79/Alessandro
oadway
1.15
1-215
Segment
Deficient Per Floating Car
Runs(YIN)
Overriding .
Considerations
(YIN)
Reason for Overriding Considerations
Alessandro
to SR 74
SR 74 West
to I-15
N
Y
N
SR 79
Alessandro
1-15 to SR 74
N (1)
(1) Combine segments from 1-15 to Murrieta Hot Springs Road to achieve this result
"
A G E N D A I T E M 1 0
A p r e s e n t a t i o n w i l l b e m a d e b u t
t h e r e i s n o a t t a c h m e n t t o t h e
a g e n d a f o r i t e m 1 0 .
"
A G E N D A I T E M 1 1
A p r e s e n t a t i o n w i l l b e m a d e b u t
t h e r e i s n o a t t a c h m e n t t o t h e
a g e n d a f o r i t e m 1 1 .
" A G E N D A I T E M 1 2
"
"
"
R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N
D A T E :
M a r c h 2 0 , 2 0 0 6
T O :
T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r
S U B J E C T :
F Y 0 5 / 0 6 O b l i g a t i o n D e l i v e r y P l a n
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e T A C t o :
1 ) R e v i e w a n d u p d a t e t h e F Y 0 5 / 0 6 O b l i g a t i o n P l a n i f a p p l i c a b l e .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
O b l i g a t i o n P l a n s w e r e s u b m i t t e d b y e a c h c o u n t y t h r o u g h o u t t h e s t a t e s o t h a t
C a l t r a n s a n d t h e C a l i f o r n i a T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n c a n a n t i c i p a t e t h e
a m o u n t o f f u n d i n g ( O b l i g a t i o n a l A u t h o r i t y ( O A ) ) n e e d e d a n d t h e v o l u m e o f
o b l i g a t i o n s p e r q u a r t e r .
T h e a t t a c h e d F Y 0 5 / 0 6 O b l i g a t i o n P l a n w a s s u b m i t t e d t o C a l t r a n s L o c a l
A s s i s t a n c e i n N o v e m b e r 2 0 0 5 . I t r e f l e c t s t h o s e p r o j e c t s t h a t w i l l b e o b l i g a t e d
d u r i n g t h e 0 5 / 0 6 f i s c a l y e a r . T h e O b l i g a t i o n P l a n w a s i n c l u d e d i n t h e J a n u a r y
T A C m e e t i n g a g e n d a a n d i s b e i n g d i s t r i b u t e d a g a i n s o t h a t l o c a l a g e n c i e s c a n
p r o v i d e u p d a t e s t o t h e p l a n .
P l e a s e n o t i f y R C T C i f a n y c h a n g e s n e e d t o b e m a d e . W e a l s o n e e d t o v e r i f y t h a t
t h o s e p r o j e c t s p l a n n e d f o r o b l i g a t i o n i n t h e f i r s t q u a r t e r a n d s e c o n d q u a r t e r s
( e n d i n g D e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 0 5 a n d M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 6 , r e s p e c t i v e l y ) w e r e a c t u a l l y
o b l i g a t e d . A g e n c i e s t h a t i d e n t i f i e d t h e i r p r o j e c t s f o r o b l i g a t i o n i n t h e t h i r d q u a r t e r
s h o u l d b e s u b m i t t i n g t h e i r o b l i g a t i o n p a c k a g e w i t h i n t h e n e x t 9 0 d a y s .
a
a
a,
u » C
i c 21
7,41f,
3 E,�
s V^
«
'8EV__486°4
»«»«
8
«
8
»
8'-
4§4
»»«
a
s
g
G
m
g__
s
5,
.
m
n
MM
x
6,
g
�_n
m,-8po
a ^
M
»»
yy w»»8»»»«««««»
ESLm88
»»...
»»»»»
g
g R"4,s,,
»««««»««»»»
-
iv
...
agg
»»...,
ry=
«.a»«»nnnn«
E;�8__n�8'
«»««»«»»»»
-�
,3
a_nan..n_nnn.nn_nnmm»n
von
__.
v..
na
m NN3
9
ai
F
a
S
AA pp
ii�,
III
iiaa
7
1
a
ill
III
8.
so[[¢w
5
I!.1
¢ P
¢
KKK J.
¢¢¢¢
I
¢¢¢
¢
11¢
85
hi
a
°�
Li
» '
9 ppWdW
�.9.iA
id
to
2Q3�
¢x
Ar
6
�
avi<
a
R9
P3j
1
..aN
3$3$�S�$yyjRRc
y
C
60,1%C�Oil.
K
£[�wa�C0Y(3axjE
f,
11:,
d
222
,
ii
Elo
it
�p$�6fN99<EE
;NQ
q
r.
�s
°,2
�N
n
S£
00
g.
¢
^
$
-A
A88
pp5
M
¢x�a�
SBP.,r
''$3g��g�§�a�aaa'aa�
�fl
a�'_'9p�p
88
C.p«p
2
�_ 8�
L�
a
g
1
a
A
s
§
j
2
F
a, s
en
g
e
g' `��il
Ir
5. 6
°u__n
�a$�
{
"
tl
yy
4'�d
Pi�@i�zuzggz
�L
L
g$g$
a£ns¢¢cc
£
'
g
�uil
8 1
AgUap�
€g
2
..
yg�i
,34i9110.0.44
%
yy38a
@
*ppE90
5�05$f�
8 8 3
g3 33y30
8J
b
dwm
..
€€
.2
ggpp g
3u¢
-
S,3
9
n
n °P.Kk�kKK°
g
RCo
ME°
uu¢�°¢GuK
1
2
�
uu°
uoF
�uuu
¢C¢
°°
°_
°
5
u¢
¢
a
5
a
f--G
11
j
666„6,W666
qj
o666666
rS
66o�o6606oM666
qgqu
1151
g
6 6
66
88888888888
88888888888888888888888888888
888
888
88
" A G E N D A I T E M 1 3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
March 20, 2006
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Shirley Medina, Program Manager
SUBJECT:
TE Project Update
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the TAC to:
1) Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Based on the information received on project schedules last month, the following
table has been updated to reflect 1) the approved TE funds, local match and
Total Project Cost; 2) the TE project programming; 3) TE eligibility determination
dates; and 4) the TE STIP targets vs. TE programming.
As previously reported, the TE funds are programmed in the STIP as a lump
sum. Once projects are ready for allocation we will program them in the STIP
individually and allocate at the same time. As you will note, we have $5.2 M of
programming in fiscal year 2005/06 and $5.7 M as our target for that year. We
can move these funds to fiscal year 2006/07 to prevent from losing the funds.
We also ask those agencies that will request project allocations in fiscal year
2006/07 to closely review their schedules. Projects that do not request their
allocation in the program year can lose the funds. Therefore, if a project is
scheduled for allocation of construction funds, all prior phases must be
completed and approved. As a reminder, it takes approximately six weeks to
process STIP amendments and allocations.
•
TE PROGRAMMING
Agency
Project
TE Funds
Local Match
(000's)
Total
Project Cost
Riverside Co
Santa Ana River Bike Tr
$ 1,416
$ 3,868
$ 5,284
Perris
Perris Gateway
$ 425
$ 1,325
$ 1,750
Beaumont
Historic San Timoteo Bike a& Ped
$ 1,416
$ 1,187
$ 2,603
Corona
Downtown Enh & Beautification
$ 1,416
$ 5,484
$ 6,900
Moreno Valley
Sunnymead Blvd Median Enh
$ 1,416
$ 2,674
$ 4,090
Corona
E Sixth Street
$ 1,416
$ 1,584
$ 3,000
Palm Desert
Monterey Avll-10 on/off ramps
$ 378
$ 422
$ 800
Riverside
Alessandro Median landscaping
$ 944
$ 1,056
$ 2,000
Riverside
SR60/Market IC landscaping
$ 472
$ 528
$ 1,000
RTA
Perris Multi -modal Transit Center
$ 1,352
$ 3,914
$ 5,266
Temecula
Winchester Rd/SR79
$ 1,133
$ 1,252
$ 2,385
Palm Desert
Monterey Av/Dinah Shore landsc.
$ 567
$ 633
$ 1,200
RCTC
Greenway Corridor, Perris Val line
$ 1,113
$ 1,245
$ 2,358
San Jacinto
Francisco Estudillo Heritage Enh
$ 472
$ 178
$ 650
La Quinta
Jefferson St Beautification
$ 445
$ 199
$ 644
Cathedral City
Cath Cyn Dr/Terrace Bike & Ped
$ 445
$ 152
$ 597
Indio
Hwy 111 Enhancements
$ 1,416
$ 684
$ 2,100
Palm Springs
Gene Autry Gateway landscap.
$ 1,375
$ 845
$ 2,220
$ 17,617
$ 27,230
$ 44,847
Old TEA 21: Hemet
Calimesa
Norco
Cath City
SAFETEA LU and Old TEA 21
TE Targets:
TE STIP PROGRAMMING
Con Start
Eligibility
App Date
FY 06/07
FY 07/08
FY 08/09
FY 09/10
FY 10/11
1416
pending
425
Jun-07
pending
pending
pending
1416
1416
Jun-07
1/24/2006
1416
pending
2/15/2006
944
1/24/2006
472
Dec-06
1/24/2006
1352
Mar-07
pending
1133
1/24/2006
2/15/2006
1113
1/24/2006
472
pending
445
Feb-07
1/24/2006
445
1/24/2006
1416
1/24/2006
1375
1/24/2006
4110
5826
3904
1416
0
SAFETEA TE Totals
292
312
520
5234
5826
3904
1416
0.
5705 4091 3245
3230 2544
Prepared by medina 3/14/2006 Page 1
"
"
A G E N D A I T E M 1 4
A p r e s e n t a t i o n w i l l b e m a d e b u t
" t h e r e i s n o a t t a c h m e n t t o t h e
a g e n d a f o r i t e m 1 4 .
"
t • INITIAL CITY TAC MEMBER ® BANNING 99 E. Ramsey St., DUANE BURK Banning 92220-0998 Director of Public Works -· BEAUMONT ~ ~ 15501:. 6th St., JOHN WILDER /' ClY"'" Beaumont 92223 Assistant Director of Public Works ,,, BLYTHE BILL BRUNET 440 S. Main St., City Engineer Blythe 92225 Department of Public Works 1CVAG j73-710 Fred Waring Dr., iSuite 200, · ! i Palm Desert 92260 I ALLYN WAGGLE I CALIMESA I I IP. 0. Box 1190, i Calimesa 92320 I I CAL TRANS ~ 1464 W. 4th St., 6th Fl., ~ San Bernardino 92401-1400 CANYON LAKE 31516 Railroad Canyon I?-Rd., HABIB MOTLAGH Canyon Lake 92587 Contract City Engineer CATHEDRAL CITY I I 168-700 Avenida Lalo I Guerrero, I I Cathedral City 92234 BILL BAYNE I COACHELLA ELDON LEE 1515 West Sixth Street, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Coachella 92236 Department of Public Works CORONA JrJ. 815 W. 6th St. AMADQATTAN P. 0. Box940 Public Works Director . ./ Corona, 92882-3238 Public Works Department DESERT HOT SPRINGS -65-950 DAN PATNEAUDE I Pierson Blvd., Desert Assistant City Engineer I Hot Springs 92240 Engineering Department TAC~NIN MARC~O, 2006 TELEPHONE FAX E-MAIL 951-922-3130 951-922-3141 dburk@ci.banning.ca.us 951-769-8520 951-769-8526 ulcjohn1@aol.com 760-922-6612 760-922-0278 bbrunet@cityofblythe.ca.gov I ' i I I I I 1760-346-1127 I 760-340-5949 I awaggle@cvag.org I I I I 909-795-9801 1909. 795.4399 909-383-414 7 909-383-4129 I I 951-943-6504 1951-943-8416 I trilake@adelphia.net I I I I I I I I 1760-770-0360 760-202-1460 bbayne@cathedralcity.gov I 760-398-57 44 760-398-1630 elee@coachella.org 951-736-2236 951-736-2496 amadq@ci.corona.ca.us I I I I dpatneaude@ci. desert-hot-springs .ca. us i 760-329-6411 X243 760-288-0651 • ALTERNATE ALTERNATE E-MAIL Kahono Oei citybanning@hotmail.com I I Chad Aaby caaby@cityofblythe.ca.gov I I Carol Clapper cclapper@cvag.org Bill Mosby william_a_mosby@dot.ca.gov I I I Leslie Grosjean lgrosjean@cathedralcity.gov -Tony Lucero Senior Civil Engineer Department of Public Works tlucero@coachella.org r------·---~-----Ned Ibrahim I I Assistant Public Works I Director ned.ibrahim@ci.corona.ca.us __ Ryan Duarte Associate Engineer 3/2/2006
" i C I T Y - - l H E M E T 1 3 7 7 7 I n d u s t r i a l A v e . , i H e m e t 9 2 5 4 5 I 1 N D I A N W E L L S / r 9 ' : 4 4 - 9 5 0 E l d o r a d o D r . , I I n d i a n W e l l s 1 9 2 2 1 0 - 7 4 9 7 - - ~ - - � - . . . . . L . _ l l N D I O 1 0 0 C i v i c C e n t e r M a l l , I n d i o 9 2 2 0 2 ~ L A Q U I N T A , C a l l e T a m p i c o , ~ 1 P . 0 . 8 o x 1 5 0 4 , 7 8 4 9 5 ] L a Q u i n t a 9 2 2 5 3 _ . I L A K E E L S I N O R E I 1 3 0 S o u t h M a i n S t . , I L a k e E l s i n o r e 9 2 5 3 0 _ . . . t . : : ) / 1 M O R E N O V A L L E Y C I : : J T T j P . O . B o x 8 8 0 0 5 , I M o r e n o V a l l e y ! 9 2 5 5 2 - 0 8 0 5 ! M U R R I E T A 1 2 6 4 4 2 B e c k m a n C o u r t , ~ I M u r r i e t a 9 2 5 6 2 l N O R C O ~ 1 2 8 7 0 C l a r k A v e . , P . O . B o x 4 2 8 , I N o r c o 9 2 8 6 0 - 0 4 2 8 - - - - - - P A L M D E S E R T ~ ~ 7 3 - 5 1 0 F r e d W a r i n g D r . , P a l m D e s e r t 9 2 2 6 0 - 2 5 7 8 ~ A L M S P R I N G S 2 0 0 T a h q u i t z C a n y o n W a y , I P a l m S p r i n g s 9 2 2 6 2 I P V V T A , 1 2 5 W e s t M u r p h y S t . , I B l y t h e 9 2 2 2 5 I I T A C M E M B E R I M I K E G O W T I M W A S S I L P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r / C i t y E n g i n e e r I P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t I i I I I A M I R M O D A R R E S S I I T I M O T H Y J O N A S S O N P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r / C i t y E n g i n e e r K E N S E U M A L O C i t y E n g i n e e r T A C A G N I N M A R C ~ O , 2 0 0 6 I T E L E P H O N E i F A X E - M A I L i ! I ! I ' 1 9 5 1 - 7 6 5 - 3 7 1 2 1 9 5 1 - 7 6 5 - 2 4 9 3 m g o w @ c i t y o f h e m e t . o r g I i i i I i I I I 1 7 6 0 - 7 7 6 - 0 2 3 7 1 7 6 0 - 3 4 6 - 0 4 0 7 t w a s s i l @ c i t y o f i n d i a n w e l l s . o r g I I I 1 7 6 0 - 3 4 2 - 6 5 3 0 7 6 0 - 3 4 2 - 6 5 5 6 a m i r @ i n d i o . o r g I I 7 6 0 - 7 7 7 - 7 0 4 2 7 6 0 - 7 7 7 - 7 1 5 5 I t j o n a s s o n @ l a - q u i n t a . o r g ! I I C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t 9 5 1 - 6 7 4 - 3 1 2 4 x 2 4 4 9 5 1 - 6 7 4 - 2 3 9 2 I k s e u m a l o @ l a k e - e l s i n o r e . o r g ! C R A I G N E U S T A E D T E R I ! T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r / C i t y T r a f f i c E n g i n e e r 9 5 1 - 4 1 3 - 3 1 4 0 9 5 1 - 4 1 3 - 3 1 5 8 c r a i g n @ m o v a l . o r g J I M K I N L E Y I D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / C i t y E n g i n e e r 9 5 1 - 4 6 1 - 6 0 7 7 9 5 1 - 6 9 8 - 4 5 0 9 j k i n l e y @ m u r r i e t a . o r g B I L L T H O M P S O N I D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s 9 5 1 - 2 7 0 - 5 6 0 7 9 5 1 - 2 7 0 - 5 6 2 2 b t h o m p s o n @ c i . n o r c o . c a . u s I M A R K G R E E N W O O D I D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c w o r k s 7 6 0 - 7 7 6 - 6 4 5 0 7 6 0 - 3 4 1 - 7 0 9 8 m g r e e n w o o d @ c i . p a l m - d e s e r t . c a . u s - D A V E B A R A K I A N D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / C i t y E n g i n e e r 7 6 0 - 3 2 3 - 8 2 5 3 7 6 0 - 3 2 2 - 8 3 2 5 D a v e B @ c i . p a l m - s p r i n g s . c a . u s L E S N E L S O N 7 6 0 - 9 2 2 - 6 1 6 1 7 6 0 - 9 2 2 - 4 9 3 8 l n e l s o n @ c i t y o f b l y t h e . c a . g o v " I A L T E R N A T E I A L T E R N A T E E - M A I L I I I I I I I L i n d a N i x o n I - - I I I I I I I B o n d i e B a k e r I I A s s i s t a n t E n g i n e e r I I I b b a k e r @ c i t y o f i n d i a n w e l l s . o r g I I I I I I I J i m S m i t h l i s m i t h @ i n _ ~ O . O ! ~ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ I I I I I E d B a s u b a s S e n i o r C i v i l E n g i n e e r e b a s u b a s @ l a k e - e l s i n o r e . o r g - - R u s s N a p i e r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m M a n a g e r r n a p i e r @ m u r r i e t a . o r g L o r i A s k e w A s s o c i a t e E n g i n e e r L a s k e w @ c i . n o r c o . c a . u s - - - ~ I I I I R y a n G a y l e r / P h ; ! J o y 1 - . _ M a r c u s F u l l e r - - ~ - - - 3 / 2 / 2 0 0 6 I
" 1 R A N C H O M I R A G E i 6 9 - 8 2 5 H i g h w a y 1 1 1 , B R U C E H A R R Y I R a n c h o M i r a g e 9 2 2 7 0 D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s ~ y T A C A Q N I N M A R C ~ O , 2 0 0 6 R a n d y V i e g a s P r o j e c t M a n a g e r " r a n d y v @ c i . r a n c h o - m i r a g e . c a . u s I R I V E R S I D E T O M B O Y D ~ 1 1 3 ~ 0 0 ~ a i n S t . , D ~ p u t y ~ u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r / . . . , 1 R 1 v e r s 1 d e 9 2 5 2 2 C i t y E n g i n e e r 1 9 5 1 - 8 2 6 - 5 5 7 5 1 9 5 1 - 8 2 6 - 5 5 4 2 I T R n y r l @ r i v A r s i r l A r . ; : i n n v 1 : : i 1 o o n a n r o s t e r l s t n s t A r r m n v A r s 1 r l A r . ; : i n n v S i o b h a n F o s t e r I G E O R G E J O H N S O N I R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y D i r e c t o r o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I I j J u a n P e r e z 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t . , T r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d L a n d M a n a g e m e n t I D e p u t y D i r e c t o r o f 1 R i v e r s i d e 9 2 5 0 1 A g e n c y 9 5 1 - 9 5 5 - 6 7 4 0 1 9 5 1 - 9 5 5 - 3 1 9 8 I G J o h n s o n @ r c t l m a . o r g ! T r a n s p o r t a t i o n J i g ? _ e r e z @ c o . r i v e r s i d e . c a . u s i J U A N P E R E Z ! : I I I I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y D e p u t y D i r e c t o r o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I 1 I I G e o r g e J o h n s o n i 1 4 ? 8 0 ~ e m o n S t . , T r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d L a n d M a n a g e m e n t j i j I D i r e c t o r o f . i : R 1 v e r s 1 d e 9 2 5 0 1 A g e n c y : 9 5 1 - 9 5 5 - 6 7 4 0 ] 9 5 1 - 9 5 5 - 3 1 9 8 l j c p e r e z @ c o . r i v e r s i d e . c a . u s 1 T r a n s p o r t a t 1 o n i G J o h n s o n @ r c t l m a . o r g ' - - - - - � - - - - - - - - r s A N J A C I N T O . I I I . 1 / , . . 1 2 0 1 E . M a i n S t . , H A B I B M O T L A G H I : I _ _ _ I _ I S a n J a c i n t o 9 2 5 8 3 C o n t r a c t C i t y E n g i n e e r 9 5 1 - 9 4 3 - 6 5 0 4 1 9 5 1 - 9 4 3 - 8 4 1 6 t r i l a k e @ a d e l p h i a . n e t l s u N L I N E 1 j ! 3 2 - 5 0 5 H a r r y O l i v e r I I I j ~ i l , T h o u s a n d P a l m s j E U N I C E L O V I 2 7 6 1 D i r e c t o r o f P l a n n i n g 1 7 6 0 - 3 4 3 - 3 4 5 6 x 1 1 9 1 7 6 0 - 3 4 3 - 3 8 4 5 ~ 1 T E M E C U L A I B I L L H U G H E S ~ ~ \ 1 4 3 2 0 0 B u s i n e s s P a r k I D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / C i t y E n g i n e e r f W D r . , T e m e c u l a 9 2 5 9 0 P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t 1 9 5 1 - 6 9 4 - 6 4 1 1 W R C O G 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , R i v e r s i d e 9 2 5 0 1 R U T H A N N E T A Y L O R - B E R G E R I 1 9 5 1 - 9 5 5 - 8 3 0 4 9 5 1 - 6 9 4 - 6 4 7 5 1 9 5 1 - 7 8 7 - 7 9 9 1 e l o v i @ s u n l i n e . o r g b i l l . h u g h e s @ c i t y o f t e m e c u l a . o r g b e r g e r @ w r c o g . c o g . c a . u s R o n P a r k s D e p u t y P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r 3 / 2 / 2 0 0 6