Loading...
04 April 17, 2006 Technical Advisory Committee76453 • • TIME: DATE: LOCATION: TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MEETING AGENDA* 10:00 A.M. April 17, 2006 Records Banning City Hall Civic Center Large Conference Room 99 East Ramsey Street Banning, CA *By request, agenda and minutes may be available in alternative format; i.e. large print, tape. COMMITTEE MEMBERS RTA Ahmad Ansari, City of Perris Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs Bill Bayne, City of Cathedral City Tom Boyd, City of Riverside Bill Brunet, City of "Blythe Duane Burk, City of Banning City of Calimesa Mike Gow, City of Hemet Mark Greenwood, City of Palm Desert Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage Bill Hughes, City of Temecula George Johnson, County of Riverside Tim Jonasson, City of LaQuinta Jim Kinley, City of Murrieta Eldon Lee, City of Coachella Ca!trans District 8 Eunice Lovi, SunLine Transit Amir Modarressi, City of Indio Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake, (Perris) and San Jacinto Les Nelson, PVVTA Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley Dan Patneaude, City of Desert Hot Springs Juan Perez, County of Riverside Amad Qattan, City of Corona Ken Seumalo, City of Lake Elsinore Ruthanne Taylor Berger, WRCOG Bill Thompson, City of Norco Allyn Waggle, CVAG Tim Wassil, City of Indian Wells John Wilder, City of Beaumont Anne Mayer, Programming/Administration Director 11.36.02 • ' RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. TIME: 10:00 A.M. DATE: April 17, 2006 • • LOCATION: Banning City Hall Civic Center Large Conference Room 99 East Ramsey Street Banning, CA In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact Riverside County Transportation Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. SELF -INTRODUCTION 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.) 5 SB821 EVALUATION PANEL (3 VOLUNTEERS NEEDED) (Attachment) 6. WESTERN COUNTY REGIONAL ARTERIAL TUMF UPDATE (Attachment) 7. 2006 STIP — CTC RECOMMENDATIONS (Attachment) Technical Advisory Committee Meeting April 17, 2006 Page 2 8. PROJECT DELIVERY 9. FTIP UPDATE 10. FY 05/06 OBLIGATION PLAN (Attachment) 11. APRIL 12, 2006 COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS 12. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS 13. ADJOURNMENT (The next meeting will be May 15, 2006, 10:00 A.M. in Riverside.) • • • MINUTES • TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, March 20, 2006 1. Call to Order The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:00 A.M., at Riverside County Transportation Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA. 2. Self -Introductions Members Present_ Others Present: Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs Tom Boyd, City of Riverside Duane Burk, City of Banning Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage Bill Hughes, City of Temecula George Johnson, County of Riverside Tim Jonasson, City of La Quinta Phil Joy, City of Palm Desert Eldon Lee, City of Coachella Bill Mosby, Ca!trans District 8 Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake, (Perris) and San Jacinto Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley Mile Nelson, Riverside Transit Agency Juan Perez, County of Riverside Amad Qattan, City of Corona Bill Thompson, City of Norco Tim Wassil, City of Indian Wells John Wilder, City of Beaumont J. D. Douglas, Kimley-Horn & Associates Marlin Feenstra, RCTC Shirley Gooding, RCTC Aaron Hake, RCTC Eric Haley, RCTC Ken Lobeck, RCTC Shirley Medina, RCTC Tom Mullen, Regional Conservation Authority Sheldon Peterson, RCTC Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 20, 2006 Page 2 Joe Richards, Regional Conservation Authority Georgiena Vivian, VRPA Technologies Heidi Von Walburg, Kimley-Horn & Associates Stephanie Wiggins, RCTC 3. Approval of Minutes No objections. 4. Public Comments There were no public comments. 5. GRADE SEPARATION CALL FOR PROJECTS — FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Stephanie Wiggins, RCTC, provided a draft agenda item to be presented to the Plans and Programs Committee on March 27 to recommend awarding of the Alameda Corridor East (ACE) SAFETEA-LU Earmark. The $125 million earmark approved in July is going to be split four ways between RCTC, SANBAG, OCTA and Alameda Corridor East in San Gabriel Valley. At its December 2005 meeting, the Commission authorized the release of a Call for Projects and approved the evaluation criteria for the Call. She explained the criteria, the eligible projects for the Call and the $21 million award recommendation of the $31 million that is available to RCTC; $16 million of the $21 million would be allocated towards construction for grade separation projects that can be delivered within the next three years. It is recommended that $5 million be awarded for project development to the city of Corona and an unincorporated area of the county. $10.25 million will be left unprogrammed and make it available on a first come/first serve basis, based upon shelf readiness. Eric Haley, RCTC, stated that the executive directors of the four county transportation commissions, as well as the executive director of San Gabriel Valley Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority agreed that the $125 million was intended for the four counties and the Alameda Corridor East area but not the construction authority itself. The $30 million that was put in the bill by the Senate will go to the Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority. • • Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 20, 2006 Page 3 Ms. Wiggins recommended that the agencies work with Ken Lobeck, RCTC, on programming the funds in the FTIP due to restrictions relating to the availability of the funding. M/S/C (Qattan/Johnson) to approve the funding recommendations. 6. RAILROAD CROSSING UPDATE Stephanie Wiggins provided an update of the associated delay and emissions impact as a result of performing actual train counts at the crossings and incorporating the delays related to switching. She introduced J. D. Douglas, Kimley-Horn & Associates who highlighted the results. He stated that a comprehensive survey of actual operations at a number of railroad crossings was done. There are approximately 60 at -grade crossings in the priority study and about 15 were counted. Because the switching delay was an important issue, every crossing that was identified as potential switching delay in priority tier I or II were counted. In addition, samples at two or three crossings on each of the four lines were collected. In total, there were three day -time counts at each of the locations — daytime being 5:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. Each crossing was counted once during the overnight period from 8:00 P.M to 5:00 A.M. He explained the speed and length assumptions for 2005 versus the updated analysis assumptions and highlighted the Total Priority Comparison scores. 7. PROJECT DELIVERY ASSISTANCE Bill Mosby, Ca!trans District 8, indicated that Shawn Yeung, District 8 Local Assistance Engineer, will replace Wendy Li shortly. In the interim, Nader Naquib is acting in that capacity. Mr. Mosby further highlighted other staff restructuring that will take place at District 8. He indicated that the district will contact individual agencies in the next month or so to determine what projects are active. He stated that the draft Memorandum of Understanding between the RCTC on behalf of local agencies and District 8 regarding project delivery issues resolution is a good document. He encouraged the TAC to state specific weaknesses that need to be cured (e.g., DBE questions, the FTIP, etc.) which District 8 will address through training. He stated that the database is running and that the district is working to have it available online. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 20, 2006 Page 4 Ms. Medina provided responses to the Ombudsman Service Query and requested that the agencies that have not responded do so in order to make a recommendation of what the TAC wants in terms of project delivery assistance. She also requested that the agencies comment on the MOU. A TAC subcommittee meeting will be scheduled and return to the TAC with a recommendation. A suggestion was made that if the agencies could arrange with RCTC to "wash" the federal funds and put the funding on the big projects and give local Measure A funding in return, less burden would be put on Ca!trans and they would manage fewer projects. 8. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MSHCP Joe Richards, Deputy Director, Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), introduced Tom Mullin, Interim Executive Director, RCA. Mr. Richards provided the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan - A Part of the Riverside County Integrated Plan, and offered an overview of the plan. Mr. Richards and Mr. Mullen responded to various questions regarding the plan. It was suggested that a WRCOG subcommittee reconvene to further discuss the issues related to the MSHCP and if individual meetings are warranted, the agencies should contact RCA directly. 9. 2006 CMP UPDATE Georgiena Vivian, VRPA Technologies, provided a comprehensive document relating to traffic counts as requested at the January TAC meeting. She highlighted the process that was used in obtaining the counts and responded to questions. In response to a request, Ms. Medina stated that there will be an update on what funds will be at risk if agencies are not complying with the CMP. M/S/C (Neustaedter/Harry) to approve the 2006 Congestion Management Plan with the caveat regarding construction at French Valley to alleviate that deficiency. • • • Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 20, 2006 Page 5 10. STIP UPDATE Shirley Medina stated that the STIP will be adopted in April. A recommendation from the CTC staff is expected this week and if there is information to share with the TAC, she will do so via e-mail. 11. FTIP UPDATE Due to time constraints, Ken Lobeck, RCTC, stated that he will provide an FTIP update at the next TAC meeting. 12. FY 05/06 OBLIGATION DELIVERY PLAN Ms. Medina requested that the TAC look at the obligation delivery plan to update it. If a project has not been obligated by March 30, it should be updated and agencies should notify Ms. Medina when it will be obligated. 13. TE UPDATE Shirley Medina stated that most of the projects in the TE have been determined eligible by Ca!trans Headquarters. She will schedule a workshop to review the TE allocation process. 14. MARCH 8, 2006 COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS Eric Haley stated that the Route 60 groundbreaking between Valley and 1-15 will be April 12. Revenue estimates, strategic plan and public/private partnership are moving forward and will come together in the June/July timeframe. 15. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no other announcements. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 20, 2006 Page 6 16. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 12:10 P.M. The next meeting is scheduled for April 17, 2006, 10:00 A.M., Banning City Hall Civic Center, 99 East Ramsey Street, Banning, CA. Respectfully submitted, Shirley Medin Program Manager • AGENDA ITEM 5 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: April 17, 2006 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager SUBJECT: SB 821 Evaluation Panel STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the TAC to: 1) Appoint TAC members to serve on SB 821 Evaluation Panel. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: It's that time of year when we need three volunteers to serve on the SB 821 Evaluation Panel. The Evaluation Panel will meet during the month of June, probably sometime in the first couple of weeks. Ideally, the volunteers would be from a local agency that does not plan on submitting projects for this year's SB 821 Call for Projects. • AGENDA ITEM 6 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: April 17, 2006 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager SUBJECT: Western County Regional Arterial Program TUMF Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the TAC to: 1) Receive and file the Western County TUMF Regional Arterial Program Update. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The attached tables provide information on the Western County TUMF Regional Arterial Program. The attachments are as follows: • TUMF Regional Arterial Program Progress Report - March 29, 2006 • TUMF Regional Arterial Program Projected Cash Flow (Reimbursements) • RCTC TUMF Programming Administrative Policy Staff will present the information and answer any questions at the TAC meeting. I • • TUMF REGIONAL ARTERIAL PROGRAM PROGRESS REPORT March 29.2006 Proiects Programmed 23 Agreements Signed 10 Ageements In Process 8 Agency Project Limits Agreement Number Project Number Programmed Amount Agreement Amount (2) Phase (1) AGREEMENTS SIGNED 10 Corona Green River Road Dominguez Ranch Rd to SR 91 06-72.539 5103 $4.242 $4.242 4 Corona Foothill Parkway Lincoln to Green River 06-72-540 5102 $2.000 $2.000 2 $2.000 $2.000 3 County of Riverside Bundy Cyn/ Scott Rd 1-15 to 1-1215 06-72-524 5109 $0.712 $0.712 1 County of Riverside Eastem Bypass Auld Rd to 1.15 06-72-525 5110 $3.000 $3.000 1 County of Riverside Eastern Bypass I.C. @ I-15 06-72523 5111 $2.000 $2.000 1 County of Riverside Schleisman Rd I.0 @ I-15 06-72-522 5113 $0.750 $0.750 1 $2.000 $2.000 2 San Jacinto Ramona Expressway Sanderson to Wly City Limits 06-72-519 5117 $0.040 $0.040 1 $0.160 $0.160 2 $3.000 $3.000 4 San Jacinto 1 Ramona Expressway Seventh to Cedar 06-72520 5118 - $0.200 $0.200 1 $0.300 $0.300 2 $0.900 $0.900 3 Temecula Western Bypass Align. 1-15 to SR 79 South I.C. 06-72-542 5121 $0.700 $0.700 1 Temecula SR 79 South I.0 @ 1-15 06.72506 5120 $0.010 $0.010 2 $4.000 $4.352 3 i 1 Total Signed Aoreements PARED $7.402 I PS&E $4.470 R/W $7252 I CONST $7.242 1 TOTAL $26.366 I AGREEMENTS IN PROCESS 8 I Moreno Valley Penis Blvd Ramona Expressway to Cactus 5106 $0.389 $0.389 1 $0.871 $0.871 2 Moreho Valley Perris Blvd Ironwood to Manzanita 5105 $0.134 $0.134 1 $0.336 $0.336 2 Riverside Van Buren Blvd Andrew to Garfield 5122 $0.905 $1.003 4 Riverside Van Buren Blvd I.C. @ SR 91 5108 $2.000 $2.000 3 Riverside Van Buren Blvd Santa Ana River to Jackson 5125 $0.845 $0.845 .4 County of Riverside SR 79 Thompson to Domenigoni 5114 $2.000 $2.000 2 Counity of Riverside Van Buren Blvd Washington to Wood 5116 $0.226 $0.226 1 $0.546 $0.546 2 Temecula 1 French Valley Pkwy I.0 @ 1-15 5119 $7.000 $2.000 2 $5.517 3 Total Agreements In Process PARED $0.749 I PS&E $5.753 RIW $7.517 CONST $1.848 TOTAL $15.867 AGREEMENTS TO BE STARTED 5 Corona El Cerrito Bedford Cyn Rd to 1.15 N.B. 5101 $0.120 3 Lake Elsinore Railroad Cyn Rd 1-15 to Canyon Hills Rd 5104 $0.300 2 County of Riverside Reche Cyn/Reche Vista Heacock to S.B Co Line 5107 $0.409 1 County of Riverside Van Buren Blvd Clay to City Limits 5115 $4.860 4 County of Riverside Potrero Blvd San Timoteo Cyn Rd to Sr 79 5112 $2.000 2 RCTC REGIONAL ARTERIALS RCTC Mid County Parkway SR 79 to 1-15 2302 $6.650 1 RCTC SR 79 Realignment Gilman Springs to Domenlgoni 3003 $13.159 1 RCTC MCP/SR79 5123 $25.000 3 RCTC Green River Rd Interchange A SR 91 5124 $3.145 4 NOTES: 1.) Phases : Phase 1 ( PARED); Phase 2 (PS$E); Phase 3 (R/W); Phase 4 (Construction) 2..) Where the agreement amount is higher than programmed amount for Phases 1,2 or 3, it is due to an update of the Nexus Study. Higher amounts for Phase 4 may also be due to inclusion of a 10% contingency on construction identified in the Nexus Study but not not previously programmed. 3.) MCP/SR79 R/W Expenses to dale : MCP $1.522 and SR 79 $2.298 = $3.818 919'ES = 96Z'Zs 6L2JS Pue ZZ9'LS dOW: slap of sesuedx3 MIJ 6LJSMOW ('E •pawwe6mtl *novae] iou Lou tnq Awes snxeN et0 ul 0e01 0001 uo00ngsu00 uu A0000110e00 y,OL e to °omelets o1 enp eq °me Aew 9 eseyd JOI slunoweeey6O1 'Apa1S snxeN ayl;o mesen ue of enp s10'e to et snood Lo; Lunowe pawweBed eyi ueyl;ey614 sl Lunowe lelol moo /Ism eyl mum (" Z (Po00u43000) 9 89s4d'(AMl) E ese4d 13$Sd) Z °gelid'(03VVd ) L aseyd : seseUcl 1'L S310N 0$9'9$ 000'0$ i000"0$ 000"0$ 96Z'LS 0$£'9$ 099'9$ 1,11.0.1. 059'9$ 96Z'19 ZSE'S$ l 099'9$ ZOEZ Aeeoped AelleA MI 010H 11/101 LO eunf uel;V ILO eunf• uef)900a0• Alnf 90 eunp-uef Kea of pasungwlau ese4d Pewweffiom JequmN 10efmd uegwnN lueweo"1 shall pe(md Aeue6V a 3103fOJd 900Z/EL/Z IS1N34V3S3J118W13J1 M01d HSVO 03103f0Nd WVJOOHd 1VIH3121V d1f130 AMU 468'L6$ 695'9Z$ I00$'9LS 1.0023 ZLZ-9l$ Z9$1 L$ Ll6'96$ 1V101 SPVC$ 991"E$ 4 94VE$ 436 L6 Hs(0) ebueyaass pH uees3 °awe 0108 000-93 31-'9$ 0003 000'3 000'3 91-(3$ E 000'SZS CZ IS 61.14S/B011 010ld 6$1'3$ 31-'9$ 0007$ 0002$ 000'3 L1.0'3 L 66131-$ COOS mobluewop of sbupds usage Luewu6gee86L HS 010J 099'9$ SLZ'l$ SLE'S$ L 0S9'9$ ZO£Z 9L-1 el 6L HS Aele0ed Nun00 pm 010/d ZSE'4$ 3E3 E 000'3 OZLS 906-3-90 SL^1@70'1 tees 61 JS elneewel 01-0'0$ OL0'0$ Z 01,0'0$ LLSSS Lls'Z$ 000'ES £ 000'9$ 6115 91.-1 k$ 0'1 fumed AelleA youad ex -newel 0007$ 0007$ Z 000'3 00L'O$ 009'0$ 00E'0$ L 00C'0$ 1239 Z43-3-90 '01 1.13110S 6L HS 01 61.-1 106y ssedAB ummem elnoewel 006'0$ OSZ'OS 009'0$ 050'0$ E 006'0$ 81.16 03-3-00 uepep se °manes AemssadxS euoweH olume£ ueS 00£'O$ 090'0$ 00Z'0$ 050'0$ Z 90E0$ 00Z'0$ 090'0$ OS L'0$ L 000'0$ 000'6$ 000'3 000'3 9 000'E$ L119 61.9-ZL-90 Run AP0 Alm m uomepues Aemssadx3 euoweH mopes ues 091-0$ 0E0'0$ 0EL'OS Z 09 CO$ 090.0$ 060'0$ L 090'0$ 000'3 000'3 009'0$ 009'0$ Z DOO'Z$ ELLS ZZS-ZL-90 G1-1001 PJ uewsle140$ e1310,10NJ JO AIunos OSfO$ OSZ'O$ OOEOS 00Z"0$ L DSL'OS 000"Z$ 00E' L$ 009'08 °WO'S Z DOD'Z$ ZL LS 6L JS 01 pH uA0 oaioula ueS PAIR magod eplsienla;o Nunoo 000'ZS 00E0$ 005'O$ 009'0$ 00£'0$ L 000'0$ LL1.9 EZ9-ZL-90 SH®'0'1 ssedAB '00e3 epismesi Jo Nunoo 000-ES 009'LS 009'0$ 009'0$ 004"09 L 000'E$ OILS SZS-Z1-90 9L-101 pH PIny ssetlAB uuelses aspenlHlo/ono° 499-0$ 9L VO$ OSZ'OS OOTOS Z 119'0S 91.L5 poom o; u016ulysem me uane ueA epleeAlH le ALunop 9ZZ"0$ 9L0'0$ 001'09 090'0$ l 9ZZ'O$ 09911 098'PS 4 098'PS SLLS sewn 4001°610 ems uans ueA epleanlu lO Alunop 000'n 009'0$ 0099E 009-0$ Z 000'ZS SLLS emeluewo0 al uosawoyl 6L JS eppetuu to Alunoo Z11'0$ ZL L'OS 00£'0$ 00$'0$ L ZLL'O$ 601.9 4L9•ZL•90 9LZ1.1 01 SLi PJ 1100S/uAO Apune epleeAlH;o Nunop 999'0$ 599'0$ 4 948'0$ 9ZL6 u0svep 01 uenoA ewes PAIR uan8 ueA epleeAlH 000'3 000'3 E 000'Z$ 90 L$ l6 HS 00'0'1 PNB uans ueA emsleesd E001$ E00'3 4 906'0$ ZZ LS pleUm001 mapuy pAl8 00;08 usA eplsuaAlJ 60VOS 609'0$ 1 601,09 LO LS am 00 8'S o1 x000eaH e1elA e40eH/uLO °p.m epleeAlH;0 Nunn 9E£'0$ LBZ'0S 640'0$ Z 9EE'0$ SO LS esuezueyy se po0muml PNB swed Amme ouaoyy 4E VOS el Vat 9L0'OS L b£L'OS LLWO$ 669'09 ZLZ0$ Z LL9'O$ 90L9 snleep oL Aemasadx3 euoweu PA18 swed AelleA 0ue011 68E'0$ 9ZO'OS L6Z'O$ 990'0$ L 68£'0$ 00E"0$ 00E'0$ Z 00E'0$ 40L9 PH NUN u0Aue00191-1 pH uAO. Pewee/A aoulsl3 eNel OZ VD$ OZVO$ E. MVOS /0/9 '8'N 91-101 PH uA0 Pugpa8 0900013 euao0 0007$ 0007$ $ 0007$ Z01-9 096-3-90 iagH ueae of mason Aem1ped 1161100d euaop 0007$ 000'Z$ Z 000'3 Z4Z'9$ 3L'E$ 005'0$ 4 Z9Z'9$ EDl$ 6E5-ZL-90 LB HS of pH 40ueH zan6u!w00 peoH uanlJ uses euaop 10'101 LO eunf ueyV LO eunf • uef 90 pea- LIM` 90 eunf- uef oleo of pesungwleu IL) ese4d lunoury pounueu6oad uegwnry loelom uegwnN - Lueu aau6V sewn refoud Aaue6V lZ 03103k-08d 9000/6Z/E IS1N3W3932181413H) MOId HSVO 03103fOHd WV2100Jd 1VIH31HV 1VN010341 dWOl • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 8, 2006 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Shirley Medina, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Administrative Policy (TUMF) Programming BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the TUMF Programming Administrative Policy. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: ,At the September 8, 2004 Commission meeting, the Commission approved a five-year Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial program that covers FY 2005 to FY 2009. A total of $71.3 million was allocated to 23 projects for various project phases. In addition to the above, the Commission directed staff to administratively amend the project status, cost and revenue figures based on actions taken by Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) in amending the TUMF 10-Year Strategic Plan and Nexus Study. As with other funding programs, staff has identified additional administrative actions and is seeking approval to implement an administrative policy to cover such actions that may not require Commission approval. These following actions pertain to individual projects and include: 1) the reprogramming of funds within allocated amount; and 2) cost increases up to 10% for the construction phase only (the Commission's September 2004 approval did not include contingency). The proposed policy will allow staff the ,flexibility to work with the cities and in assisting with project delivery. TUMF Programming Administrative Policy Per the TUMF Project Implementation Administrative Policy, RCTC staff may approve project amendments within the following parameters: 1) Updates to the approved project status, cost and revenue figures pursuant to any actions or amendments taken by WRCOG regarding updates to the TUMF 10- year Strategic Plan and Nexus Study. 2) Reprogramming of funds, not to exceed the allocated amount, including: a. Programming funds from one phase to another b. Advancing funds from one phase to another c. Delaying funds from one phase to another 3) Allowance of an additional 10% increase for the construction phase if requested. Staff anticipates reprogramming requests in the near -term and the proposed policy would result in timely processing and implementation of TUMF projects. Programming requests outside of the above parameters will be brought forward to the Commission for approval. • • AGENDA ITEM 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: April 12, 2006 TO: Plans and Programs Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2006 State Transportation Improvement Recommendations Program — CTC STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to: 1) Receive and file the 2006 State Transportation Improvement Program California Transportation Commission Staff Recommendations; 2) Reaffirm RCTC's commitment of programming 2008 STIP and other currently available local Measure A and/or federal funds (CMAQ and RSTP) to the SR 91 HOV project, from Adams to Mary Street, to complete funding of the construction phase; 3) Adjust the imbalance of 2006 STIP Intra-county formula funds in the 2008 ' STIP; and 4) Work with Palo Verde Valley on substitute funding for the deleted STIP project on Intake Boulevard. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On April 7, 2006 the California Transportation Commission (CTC) released their staff recommendations for the 2006 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). These recommendations will be presented for approval at the April 26-27, 2006 CTC meeting. The 2006 STIP adds two new years of programming providing a total of $5.895 billion in funding covering fiscal years 2006/07 — 2010/11 Unfortunately, the outcome of the recommendations (Attachment A) reflect Riverside County programming levels at just above our minimum programming capacity at $49.711 million (minimum level was $45.5 million). As you may recall, our January 30, 2006 STIP submittal included programming at the estimated "Target" level, which was $167 million of new capacity. The reason for the decrease in programming is that there isn't enough funding available for highway and road projects. Only $455 million of new capacity is available statewide for highway and road projects. The total statewide request for highway and road funding was $1.23 billion. As a result, most counties are being held to less than 20% of their target levels leaving out $780 million in highway and road proposals from the STIP. Riverside County received approximately 30% of the estimate target. This is attributable to the addition of the Perris Valley Line project for $30 million. As for rail and transit programming, $1.355 billion is the statewide amount available for programming in the 2006 STIP. The statewide programming request for rail and transit projects is $625 million. This leaves $730 million in rail and transit capacity unprogrammed in the STIP. Additional transit and rail projects may be amended into the STIP using this unprogrammed capacity. The disparity between the "highway and road" projects and the "rail and transit" projects highlights the need and imbalance of highway projects and availability of highway funding. There were a few counties that had more rail and transit projects in their STIP submittals and were able to receive funding at or above their minimum targets. These agencies included the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LAMTA), the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), and Sacramento County. In areas with population growth or lack of density, the demand for highways and roads far outweighs the need for programming rail and transit projects in the STIP. Riverside County STIP Recommendations versus January 30, 2006 STIP Submittal The differences between our submittal and what is being recommended by the CTC is outlined as follows: • New Programming Capacity has been reduced from $167 million to $49.711 million • 1-10 Indian Avenue Interchange has been moved from fiscal year 2007/08 to 2008/09 • 1-15 California Oaks/Kalmia Interchange has been moved from fiscal year 2007/08 to 2009/10 • Projects recommended for deletion are: 91 HOV construction funding, 1-10 Jefferson Interchange, 1-10 Date Palm Interchange, 1-10 Palm Drive/Gene Autry Interchange, and the Intake Blvd widening and signal project. • • Note: the Jefferson Interchange and Intake Boulevard projects were previously included in the 2004 STIP. Funding for Planning, Programming, and Monitoring (PPM) will be reduced from $3.342 million to $994,220 to reflect the Commission's policy to program up to 2% of new capacity for planning, programming and monitoring activities. The funds will be reprogrammed to an existing project and/or will remain in the unprogrammed county share balance for future programming. The STIP recommendations include the AB3090 reprogramming commitments from the SR 60 HOV, Valley Way to I-15, and SR 91 /Green River Interchange projects to the 60/215 East Junction, which is now fully funded. Further the AB 3090 cash reimbursements for the 60/91/215 IC ($31 million) and the PPM ($166,000) are still in place and will be repaid in fiscal year 2006/07 and 2007/08 respectively. Riverside County's unprogrammed county share balance is now at $117 million. There have been previous commitments made by the Commission to dedicate future Western County STIP funding to the 91 HOV project. Staff is seeking reaffirmation of this commitment and direction to program uncommitted funds from Measure A, federal fund sources (Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funds) and 2008 STIP funding to complete the 91 HOV construction funding. Staff is also recommending working with Palo Verde Valley on replacement funds for the Intake Boulevard project that is being deleted. Coachella Valley Association of Governments will work with its member agencies on funding for those projects not recommended for programming. The 2006 STIP Intra-county formula (Attachment B) has been revised to reflect the programming capacity at $49.711 million. Given that the 2006 STIP new program capacity for Coachella Valley is $12.654 million and the Coachella Valley received $13.631 million (additional funds programmed on Ramon Road minus the funds from the 1-10 Jefferson project that was carried over from the 2004 STIP and now deleted), an adjustment to the 2008 STIP will be made to reduce the Coachella Valley formula by $977,000. In addition, a review of the STIP Inue-county Formula will be conducted to ensure that the subregions have received their fair share since the 1998 STIP. Attachments: Attachment A — CTC Staff Recommendation Attachment B — 2006 STIP Intra-County Formula • CTC STAFF RECOMMENDATION FROM COUNTY SHARE FOR 2006 STIP 00e8 Not Include STIP Interregional Share Funding (See Separate Listing) (S1,000.0 Proposed New Non•TE Programming: Minimum 49,711 45,542 Target Maximum 167,094 197,322 UnderfOvarl No •TE Tuaet 117.383 ATTACHMENT • Riverside Pro ect Totals by Fiscal Year Protect Totals by Component Agency Rte PPND Protect Voted Total Prior 08-07 07.08 05-09 08-10 10.11 RIW Conet E & P PS&E RAN Sup eon sue RCTC 9803 Planning • •gramml • and monitor] g Mar•05 170 170 0 D 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 0 0 RCTC -f10:911Xidikri• ruyduBlF,• Jul-05 9531MICIIIIIIMIIIIIIIILI 0 0NEM 0Mr122111M10 01111111:1 0 Coltrane 11:11®1 AB 3080 RIP MCA 3,0681MEMIIII1111101111111:1111111113 O IOW IN111113111ELITIO111113 0 0 Caltrans inipillEVIIJeffereon St lMerehang a widen CC MINIM IIMEIN11113 e 01111111113MEN3 11111113MM�' 1so 0 0 Coltrane MECIIIIIIEND'Da Ja: COI ad -dial• •Yemenis. 02S-72 MEN 3,728 MBEEI 0 0 0 0MEM 1111Wfil 0 547 2157 227 0 Coltrane 10 70 Indian Av Interchange widen OC ramps 150 150 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 T O Coltrane 79 66DI Hunter Rd-Domen oniP widen 02S58 438 438 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 438 0 0 0 RCTC cash 1109 AB 3090 reimbursement (03-04 PPMX028•124) 166 0 0 166 0 0 0 0 166 0 0 0 0 RCTC ash 121P AS 3090 reimburse - 50191/215,025.102, RIP, 85 % 26,625 0 26,625 0 0 0 0 0 26,625 0 0 0 0 0 0 Coltrane MEI OARVEE debt Rt 215 El Cerrito- Rt 60/91 RIP 85% 156,707 11111101111MNI 22,6100 22,610 NEM 22 611 0 156 707 0 0 I12M=INIIIIMOIVII Pierson BI, rehab • avement 627 0 0 0 NINO 0 627 0 0 0 RCTC loc 92A rat 91, Adams St-Rt 60/215, HOV lanes, deslgn(045-1 ) 13,070 13,070 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,070 0 0 RCTC tdm 9801 Rideehare •rogram 400 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 400 0 0 0 0 GARVEE debt service for 2011.12 22.611 0 0 0 0 0 22.611 0 22,611 0 0 0 0 ■.I Prior Commitments (Not Part of 2006 STIP Target). 228.853I 66,395 49,236 22,776 22810 22,611 45,222 797211,317 985 15,527 227 0 Coltrane IIIIIIIIIFEI1 HOV tones RI 15•Vall: su •elemental Feb-00 MEM IMO 0 01�' M113 0 0 0 0 D Hot S•fin gs IMM1 Pierson Bl rehab • avement DELETE -627 =El 0 0 0 01111111113 0 0 0 0 RCTC loc 92A Rt 91, Adams St Rt 60215, HOV lanes, design(045-1 DELETE -13,070 -13,070 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -13,070 0 0 RCTC tdm 9801 Rldeshare •rogram DELETE -400 -400 0 0 0 0 0 0 .400 0 0 0 0 Coltrane 10 7D Ramon Rd Intent Improvements 1025.72) INCR 43.530 -797 8,629 35,598 0 0 0 7.832 30,373 0 0 0 5,325 Coltrane 10 70 I Indian Ay lnterohan, a widen OC, ram •- 13,506 0 0 0 13506 0 0 0 11,866 0 0 0 1,640 Coltrane 1111122111/311 Calif Ooksiealmla intee:banr a lm• •vs 04S55 NMI 5457 11111111111111111LIMME 100 5,357 0 NNW 4 94 11111111:1 r. 0 963 Coltrane 1131.221I Adams St-Rt 60215, HOV lanes add RMf 1111121111111ERII MIMIC 0 END 31.1111113 0 20 000 0 MIN] 0 3,100 0 Coltrane NEJKIM19E60215 East Junction connector (RTIP) IIIIMIIMEMEI NMI 0 o 0 lifill£1•1111:1 0 1115M11•113 0 0 0 Munieta =EMI1 Rf 15 Calif Oaks/Kelmia interchan tie bn • a 04655 0 111111,3 0 KIM 0 NNE 11110111111•13111M11311111113 0 0 Rlverslde loc 54I Rt 91, Van Buren BI Imerchande RAN NEW 3,465 0 0 0 3,485 0 0 3,465 0 0 0 0 0 Riverside Co be 70 Rt 10 Indian AV Infarct% tie widen OC ram•-. 2000 0 0 2,000 0 0 0 . 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 RCTC ■ 98031 Planning,programming, and monitoring Qncreased) 4,262 0 1,947 1,315 1,000 0 0 0 4,262 0 0 0 0 Total Non•TE/PTA Proposed for Programming in 2005 STIP 102.447 3,243 10,576 62,113 20.295 17706 111111110I 35,521 68 868 0 -12,970 3 100 7.928 11111111 IMIIrl Ht, hwa /Road Re • • rammin r T et 82 736 Elm 25 763 45175 11 798 0 EWEN I•�I Under .,i to ,et 197 1 �IREIIS i1511• g : 84g7 (12,7 0 _ Cumulative under (over) 3,243 18,430 1,492 (7.005) 119,711) ■ RCTC roil 1114 Persia Valley Une, commuter rail extension NEW 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 Total PTA -el • Ible Proposed for Programmin, In 2006 STIP 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 MUM �� PTA P • , ramming 2004 STIP �� NINO 0 0 0 111111111121111111111 IOIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIMIIIIIII �11111IMMI In•er S MOM o ••• 111MIMINE1. 0 (KLkLI)1 0 OMNI 1111=1111•11 Cumulative under (over) 2004 STIP 0 0 0 30.000) (30,0001 (30.000) California Transportation Commission Pape 55 of 111 4/7/2006 • CTC STAFF RECOMMENDATION FROM COUNTY SHARE FOR 2006 STIP Does Not Include STIP Interregional Share Funding (See Separate Listing) Riverside - Project Totals by Fiscal Year Project Totals by Component Agency Rte PPNo Project Voted Total Prior 06417 07.08 08-09 09-10 10.11 R!W Const E & P PS&E RAV sup Con sup RCTC res 1112 TE reserve 18,815 0 1,209 6,37B 4,578 4,106 2,544 0 18,8/5 0 0 0 0 Total TB Pro oiled tor Programming In2006STIP 18,815 0 1,209 6,378 4,578 4,108 2,544 0 18,815 0 0 0 0 Enhancement Target 18,815 5,705 4,091 3,245 3,230 2,544 Under rover) target 0 0 4,496 (2.2871 (1,3331 (8761 0 Cumulative under loverl 0 4,456 2.209 876 0 0 Preteot Proposals No Included In Staff Recommendation ADD 86,832 10,877 NEW 8,542 NEW 8,087 1,875 Coltrane 91 92A Adams St-Rt 80/215, HOV lanes, add con Caltmns 10 53A Jefferson St Interchange, widen OC Riverside Co lac 12E Rt 10 Date Palm Interchange Riverside Co ion 7E Rt 10 Palm Drive/Gene Autry Interchange Blythe loo• 98E Intake Blvd, Hobaonway-14th, widen, signal(04S-3B) Celifomla Trensporta0on Commission Pegs 56 of 111 4/7/2008 2006 STIP Intra-County Formula for New Program Capacity 2006 STIP New Funding Capacity for Programming 2% Planning, Programming & Monitoring Formula Breakdown: Western County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley 74.45% 24.76% 0.79% Total PPM Available STIP Funds Available for New Program Capacity Formula Breakdown: $ 740,197 $ 246,169 $ 7,854 $ 994,220 Western County 74.45% $ Coachella Valley 24.76% $ Palo Verde Valley 0.79% $ Total New Program Capacity $ 36,269,643 12,062,275 384,863 48,716,780 $ 49,711,000 994,220 $ 48,716,780 *2004 STIP Adjustment $ (612,743) $ $ 591,875 $ $ 20,868 $ $ 35,656,900 12,654,150 405,731 48,716,780 ATTACFAGIENT B • AGENDA ITEM 8 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 8. • • AGENDA ITEM 9 • A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 9. • • AGENDA ITEM 10 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: April 17, 2006 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager SUBJECT: FY 05/06 Obligation Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the TAC to: 1) Receive and file the FY 05/06 Obligation Plan BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the March 2006 TAC meeting, the FY 05/06 Obligation Plan was distributed to the TAC to review and update. The attached FY 05/06 Obligation Plan reflects updates given to us by local agencies through the recent milestone reports received. The need for milestone updates is critical so that we can plan our obligations and advise Caltrans of the number of obligations that are coming forward. We also need to prepare to ask for extensions on obligation balances if necessary. Based on our obligation target for FFY 05/06, Riverside County agencies need to obligate $34 million through a combination of RSTP and CMAQ projects. The $34 million does not take into account the obligations made in the second quarter (January 1, 2006 to present). Although we estimate the obligations that occurred over the second quarter may be about $1-2 million. According to the spreadsheet approximately $24 million is planned for obligation by the end of FY 05/06. Obligation packages should be submitted as quickly as possible and before mid -August 2006 to allow enough time for Caltrans to obligate the funds. If only $24 million can be obligated for the remaining of the 2005/06 federal fiscal year, the balance will be carried over to the next fiscal year. This carryover is not guaranteed and can be reprogrammed by Caltrans. However, carrying over prior balances into the next fiscal year has been "past practice" and to date, we haven't heard that this would be discontinued. AB 1012 Use It or Lose It provisions require agencies to obligate the RSTP and CMAQ funds that are three years old. If not, the State can reprogram the funds to another county. Riverside County agencies must obligate $14 million of RSTP funds by mid -August 2006. Based on the updated Obligation Plan, we have $13.622 million of RSTP projects planned for obligation. We have the option to request an extension on the balance; however, there is no guarantee that the. California Transportation Commission will grant extension requests. We strongly urge agencies to uphold their project schedules and delivery these projects as quickly as possible. If agencies are in the position to advance their projects please contact me to see if we can accommodate this request. FFY 05/06 Obli Plan (04-11-06) Local Agency FTIP no Project Location — - - Project/scope description ;planned oblig. quarter (1/213/4) " p planned obligations total project; (all fund types) ($) RSTP ($) CMAQ{$) Other Funds/ Demo fed. ($) Comments - Banning RIV031223 Wilson St Rehabilitation 2 4 $ 207 $ 207 Beaumont RIV031223 Palm Ave Rehabilitation 2 $ 115 $ 115 NEED UPDATE Cathedral Cih RIV050508 Ramon/Date PalmNista Chino Install Wind Fences 34 $ 79 $ 79 Cathedral Gib RIV050509 Date PalmNamer Install Wind Fences 34 $ 115 $ 115 Cathedral Cih RIV031223 Perez Rd Rehabilitation 3 $ 404 $ 404 NEED UPDATE Coachella RIV031223 Tyler St Rehabilitation 3 $ 198 $ 198 Coachella RIV011204 Dillon Road Grade Separation 3 $ 4,559 $ 4,559 Coachella RIV011209 Dillon Road Widening 4 $ 2,117 2117 CVAG RIV031230 Fringe Toed Lizard Preserve Install Wind Fences 2- 4 $ 178 $ 178 Desert Hot Sr RIV050304 Various Rehab/Reconstruction 4 $ 1,925 $ 1,925 Hemet RIV031223 State St/Devonshire Rehabilitation 2 $ 511 $ 511 NEED UPDATE La Quinta RIV031223 Ave 54 Rehabilitation 2 3 $ 229 $ 229 Moreno Valle, 32300 Nason IC construct IC and aux lane 4 $ 1,547 $ 1,547 Moreno Valle RIV52001 Ironwood Ave Rehabilitation 2 4 $ 1,111 $ 1,111 Murrieta RIV031223 Clinton Keith Rehabilitation 3 $ 369 $ 369 Palm Desert RIV031223 Country Club Dr Rehabilitation 3 $ 373 $ 373 Palm Springs RIV031223 Various Rehabilitation 3 $ 489 $ 489 Perris RIV031223 Murrieta Rd Rehabilitation 2 4 $ 282 $ 282 RCTC RIV050555 60/215 E Jct HOV Connector Ramps 3 $ 2,213 $ 2,213 RCTC RIV520109 San Jacinto Rail Perris Valley Rail Line Improvements 2 4 $ 500 $ 500 Riverside RIV031223 RR crossings Grade Separation Improv. Plan 4 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Riverside Cot RIV990701 SR6oNalley Way IC Relocate Off -ramp, Const New EB On-r 4 $ 2,670 $ 2,670 Riverside Cot RIV050507 Ave 54 paving unpaved road and shoulders 2 4 $ 228 $ 228 or 285? Riverside Cot RIV52001 Van Buren blvd Rehabilitation 4 $ 1,323 $ 1,323 Riverside Cot. RIV52000 SR74/Sherman Signal install 4 4 $ 305 $ 305 Riverside Cot RIV031223 Cajalco Rd Rehabilitation 2- 4 $ 2,056 $ 2,056 Riverside Cot RIV031223 Cajalco Rd Rehabilitation -2- 4 $ 1,970 $ 1,970 Totals $ 28,073 $ Total RSTP and CMAQ: 14,106 $ 10,042 $ 3,925 $ 24,148 • AGENDA ITEM ZZ • A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 11. • • INITIAL CITY TAC MEMBER BANNING 99 E. Ramsey St., DUANE BURK Banning 92220-0998 Director of Public Works BEAUMONT 550 E. 6th St., JOHN WILDER Beaumont 92223 Assistant Director of Public Works BLYTHE BILL BRUNET 440 S. Main St., City Engineer Blythe 92225 Department of Public Works CVAG 73-710 Fred Waring Dr., Suite 200, Palm Desert 92260 ALLYN WAGGLE CALIMESA P. 0. Box 1190, Calimesa 92320 CAL TRANS 464 W. 4th St., 6th Fl., San Bernardino 92401-1400 fr CANYON LAKE 31516 Railroad Canyon Rd., HABIB MOTLAGH Canyon Lake 92587 Contract City Engineer CATHEDRAL CITY ¢ 68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero, Cathedral City 92234 BILL BAYNE « COACHELLA ELDON LEE 1515 West Sixth Street, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Coachella 92236 Department of Public Works CORONA J9.7 815 W. 6th St. AMADQATTAN P. 0. Box940 Public Works Director Corona, 92882-3238 Public Works Department , DESERT HOT <¥f SPRINGS -65-950 DAN PATNEAUDE Pierson Blvd., Desert Assistant City Engineer Hot Springs 92240 Engineering Department TAC~GN IN APRIL~, 2006 TELEPHONE FAX E-MAIL 951-922-3130 951-922-3141 dburk@ci.banning.ca.us 951-769-8520 951-769-8526 ulcjohn1@aol.com 760-922-6612 760-922-0278 bbrunet@cityofblythe.ca.gov 760-346-1127 760-340-5949 awaggle@cvag.org 909-795-9801 909-795-4399 909-383-4147 909-383-4129 951-943-6504 951-943-8416 trilake@adelphia.net 760-770-0360 760-202-1460 bbayne@cathedralcity.gov 760-398-57 44 760-398-1630 elee@coachella.org 951-736-2236 951-736-2496 amadq@ci.corona.ca.us 760-329-6411 X243 760-288-0651 dpatneaude@ci.desert-hot-springs.ca.us • ALTERNATE AL TERNA TE E-MAIL Kahana Oei citybanning@hotmail.com Chad Aaby caaby@cityofblythe.ca.gov Carol Clapper cclapper@cvag.org Bill Mosby william_a_mosby@dot.ca.gov Leslie Grosjean lgrosjean@cathedralcity.gov Tony Lucero Senior Civil Engineer Department of Public Works tlucero@coachella.org Ned Ibrahim Assistant Public Works Director ned.ibrahim@ci.corona.ca.us Ryan Duarte Associate Engineer 4/11 /2006 .. • CITY TAC MEMBER HEMET ~ 3777 Industrial Ave., Hemet 92545 MIKE GOW /r JI INDIAN WELLS 44-950 Eldorado Dr., TIM WASSIL r • Indian Wells Public Works Director/City Engineer 92210-7497 Public Works Department 'l{ll. INDIO 100 Civic Center Mall, Indio 92202 AMIR MODARRESSI LA QUINTA P.0.Box 1504, 78-495 Calle Tampico, TIMOTHY JONASSON La Quinta 92253 Public Works Director/City Engineer ~ LAKE ELSINORE KENSEUMALO 130 South Main St., City Engineer Lake Elsinore 92530 Community Development Department MORENO VALLEY el P.0.Box 88005, CRAIG NEUSTAEDTER Moreno Valley Transportation Manager/ 92552-0805 City Traffic Engineer ~ MURRIETA 26442 Beckman Court, JIM KINLEY Murrieta 92562 Director of Public Works/City Engineer NORCO 2870 Clark Ave., P.O.Box 428, BILL THOMPSON Norco 92860-0428 Director of Public Works J~K PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert 92260-MARK GREENWOOD 2578 Director of Public works PALM SPRINGS " 3200 T ahquitz Canyon DAVE BARAKIAN Way, Director of Public Works/ Palm Springs 92262 City Engineer PVVTA 125 West Murphy St., Blythe 92225 LES NELSON TACjipN IN APRIL~, 2006 TELEPHONE FAX E-MAIL 951-765-3712 951-765-2493 mgow@cityofhemet.org 760-776-0237 760-346-0407 twassil@cityofindianwells.org 760-342-6530 760-342-6556 amir@indio.org 760-777-7042 760-777-7155 tjonasson@la-quinta.org 951-674-3124 x244 951-674-2392 kseumalo@lake-€1sinore.org 951-413-3140 951-413-3158 craign@moval.org 951-461-6077 951-698-4509 jkinley@murrieta.org 951-270-5607 951-270-5622 bthompson@ci.norco.ca.us 760-776-6450 760-341-7098 mgreenwood@ci.palm-desert.ca.us 760-323-8253 760-322-8325 DaveB@ci.palm-springs.ca.us 760-922-6161 760-922-4938 lnelson@cityofblythe.ca.gov • ALTERNATE ALTERNATE E-MAIL Linda Nixon Bondie Baker Assistant Engineer II bbaker@cityofindianwells.org Jim Smith jsmith@indio.org -( ~Ed Basubas Senior-civil Engineer ebasubas@lake-€1sinore.org Russ Napier Capital Improvement Program Manager rnapier@murrieta.org Lori Askew Associate Engineer Laskew@ci.norco.ca.us Ryan Gayler/Phil Joy Marcus Fuller 4/11/2006 • CITY TAC MEMBER PERRIS 101 North 'D' St., AHMAD ANSARI Perris 92570 Public Works Director RTA 1825 Third St., Riverside 92517 -1968 ~· RANCHO MIRAGE 69-825 Highway 111, BRUCE HARRY Rancho Mirage 92270 Director of Public Works ·~ RIVERSIDE TOM BOYD 3900 Main St., Deputy Public Works Director/ Riverside 92522 City Engineer GEORGE JOHNSON RIVERSIDE COUNTY Director of Transportation 4080 Lemon St., Transportation and Land Management A Riverside 92501 Agency JUAN PEREZ RIVERSIDE COUNTY Deputy Director of Transportation '/ 4080 Lemon St., Transportation and Land Management Riverside 92501 Agency '.J' SAN JACINTO ~ 201 E. Main St., HABIB MOTLAGH San Jacinto 92583 Contract City Engineer SUN LINE CL 32-505 Harry Oliver Trail, Thousand Palms EUNICE LOVI 92276 Director of Planning TEMECULA BILL HUGHES ~qt 43200 Business Park Director of Public Works/City Engineer Dr., Temecula 92590 Public Works Department IWRGOG 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside 92501 RUTHANNE TAYLOR-BERGER TACapN IN APRIL,,,, 2006 TELEPHONE FAX E-MAIL 951-943-6100x237 951-943-8591 aansari@cityofperris.org 951-565-5130 951-565-5131 760..770..3224 760..770..3261 bruceh@ci.rancho-mirage.ca.us 951-826-5575 951-826-5542 TBoyd@riversideca.gov 951-955-67 40 951-955-3198 GJohnson@rctlma.org 951-955-67 40 951-955-3198 jcperez@co.riverside.ca.us 951-943-6504 951-943-8416 trilake@adelphia.net 760-343-3456 X119 760-343-3845 elovi@sunline.org 951-694-6411 951-694-6475 bill.hughes@cityoftemecula.org 951-955-8304 951-787-7991 berger@wrcog.cog.ca.us • ALTERNATE ALTERNATE E-MAIL . ~ ~ ~ Habib Motlagtf Contract City Engineer trilake@adelphia.net Mike McCoy Senior Planner Planning Department mmccoy@riversidetransit.com Randy Viegas Project Manager randyv@ci.rancho-mirage.ca.us Siobhan Foster sfoster@riversideca.gov Juan Perez Deputy Director of Transportation jcperez@co.riverside.ca.us George Johnson Director of Transportation GJohnson@rctlma.org Ron Parks Deputy Public Works Director 4/11/2006