Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
08 August 28, 2006 Budget & Implementation
77891 • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TR NSPORTAT/ON COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPL MENTATION COMMITTEE MEETI G AGENDA TIME: DATE: LOCATION: 9:30 a.m. Monday, August 28, :006 Board Chambers County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 151 Floor Riverside, CA 92501 ***COMM Jeff Stone, Chair / Dis Barbara Hanna, Vice C Roger Berg / J: Robert Crain / Jos: Gregory S. Pettis / Charles Juan M. DeLara / Rich Alex Bias / Yvonne P, Bob Magee / Robert L Terry Henderson / Rick Gibbs / Dougl. Ron Meepos / Alan Steve Ada Jim Ayres / Chris John F. Tavaglione, D Eric Hale Theresia Trevi ***AREAS Annual Budget Count • Measure A Imple Public Communic Competitive Grant Programs: TEA and SB 8 i RECORDS TTEE MEMBERS*** rict Three / County of Riverside air / Art Welch, City of Banning ff Fox, City ,of Beaumont ph DeConinck, City of Blythe 'Bud" England, City of Cathedral City rd Macknicki, City of Coachella rks, City of Desert Hot Springs Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore on Adolph, City of La Quinta s McAllister, City of Murrieta eman, City of Rancho Mirage s, City of Riverside uydos, City of San Jacinto strict Two /.County of Riverside *STAFF*** Executive Director o, Chief Financial Officer F RESPONSIBILITY*** evelopment and Oversight wide Strategic Plan Legislation entation and Capital Programs tions and Outreach Programs 1-CMAQ & STP, Transportation Enhancement 1-Bicycle & Pedestrian s Prop'rty Management SAFE/Fr eway Service Patrol UMF Program and other areas as ma, be prescribed by the Commission Comments are welcomed by the Co ittee. if you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please complete and submit,a Testimony Card to the Clerk of the Commission. 11.36.06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TR BUDGET AND IMP w NSPORTA TION COMMISSION EMENTAT/ON COMMITTEE w.rctc.org GENDA * *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda :30 a.m. Monday, August 28, 2006 BOA D CHAMBERS County A • ministrative Center 4080 Le on Street, 1s` Floor Rive side, California In compliance with the Americans wit 54954.2, if you need special assistan contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) to meeting time will assist staff in assu provide accessibility at the meeting. 1 CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Apr 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The after making a finding that t item and that the item came to the posting of the agend requires 2/3 vote of the C Committee members presen unanimous vote. Added item agenda.) Disabilities Act and Government Code Section e to participate in a Committee meeting, please 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior ing that reasonable arrangements can be made to 124, 2006 and June 26, 2006 Committee may add an item to the Agenda ere is a need to take immediate action on the to the attention of the Committee subsequent . An action adding an item to the • agenda mittee. if there are less than 2/3 of the adding an item to the agenda requires a will be placed for discussion at the end of the Budget and Implementation Committee August 28, 2006 Page 2 6. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioners) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 6A. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: Pg. 1 1) Receive and file the lnterfund Loan Activity Report for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commissionfor final action. 6B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: Pg. 3 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action.. 6C. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Overview This .item is for the Committee to: Pg. 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the twelve- month period ended June 30, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee August 28, 2006 Page 3 6D. QUARTERLY INVESTM NT REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: Pg. 13 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 6E. TRANSPORTATION NIFORM MITIGATION FEE FINANCING THROUGH STATEWID: COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Pg. 24 This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file statu . report on Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Financing through Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (SCIP); and 2) Forward to the Commi-sion for final action. 6F. OBLIGATION AUTH a RITY LOAN TO SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG) Overview This item is for the Committ-e to: 1) Receive and file the Ob igation Authority Loan Report; and 2) Forward to the Commi sion for final action. • Pg. 26 Budget and Implementation Committee August 28, 2006 Page 4 6G TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) REGIONAL ARTERIAL PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: Pg. 30 1) Receive and file the TUMF Regional Arterial Program Quarterly Report; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 7. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 03-31-014-03, AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT NO. 03-31-014 WITH CHONG PARTNERS ARCHITECTURE TO PREPARE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR A PARKING STRUCTURE FOR THE NORTH MAIN CORONA METROLINK STATION Pg. 35 Overview 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-31-014-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 03-31-014 to prepare plans, specifications and 'cost estimate (PS&E) for the additional amount of $141,225, including a 3 month calendar extension to contract time, and a total not to exceed amount of $1,451,228; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee August 28, 2006 Page 5 AWARD OF AGREEMENTS PACIFIC CUTLER, INC., AND RIGHT -OF- WAY ACQUISI SEARCHES, IDENTIFICATI REPLACEMENT AND MITI UTILITIES RELOCATION SER O PARAGON PARTNERS, LTD., OVERLAND , EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS; INC. FOR ON -CALL ION AND RELOCATION; REAL PROPERTY N AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES FOR ATION SITES; COST ESTIMATES; AND, ICES Pg. 43 Overview This item is for the Committe- to: 1) Award Agreement No. 07-72-025-00 to Paragon. Partners, Ltd., Agreement No. 07-72-026-00 to Overland Pacific Cutler, Inc., and Agreement No. 07-72-4127-00 to Epic Land Solutions, Inc. to perform On -Call Right -of -Way Acquisition and Relocation; Real Property Searches, ldentificatio and Feasibility Studies for Replacement and Mitigation Sites; Cost Estimates; and, Utilities Relocation Services (ROW Services); 2) Authorize the Chairma , pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the Agreements on beh:lf of the Commission; 3) Approve an amendmen to the •FY 2006/07 budget in the amount of $300,000; and 4) Forward to the Commision for final action. COOPERATIVE AGREEMEN NO. 07-72-030-00 WITH THE CITY OF CORONA FOR THE FUN I ING AND PREPARATION OF A PROJECT REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FOR THE CAJALCO/1-15 INTERCHANGE Pg. 46 Overview This item if for the Committe- to: 1) Approve Cooperative greement No. 07-72-030-00 between the city of Corona and the Co mission for the preparation of a Project Report and Environmental Doc ment for the Cajalco/I-15 Interchange; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute this Agreement on behalf o the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee August 28, 2006 Page 6 10. ' CITY OF CORONA TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE •(TUMF) REGIONAL. ARTERIAL PROGRAMMING REQUEST FOR GREENRIVER ROAD AND EL'CERRITO ROAD PROJECTS 11. Pg. 55 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the reprogramming of TUMF funds for the Green River Road project to include $200,000 for the environmental phase, $600,000 for the design phase, and $3,442,000 for construction; • 2) Approve extending limits on the Green River Road project to Palisades Drive for plans, specifications, and cost estimate (PS&E) design work only; 3) Approve TUMF Regional Arterial Program funds for construction of the Green River Road project from SR-91 to Dominguez Ranch, Road; 4) Approve the programming of $ 1,000,000 in TUMF funds for the El Cerrito Road/I-15 Interchange improvement project to include $120,000 previously programmed for right-of-way and $880,000 in additional for the construction phase; 5) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to legal counsel review, to amend and/or execute new agreements on behalf of the • Commission to reflect the above changes; 6) Approve an amendment to the FY 2006/07 budget in the amount of $1,000,000; and 7) Forward to the Commission for final action. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF BLYTHE. REGARDING STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INTRA-COUNTY FORMULA FUNDING Pg. 61 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 07-71-028 with city of Blythe (City) trading a total of $2,291,656 , of State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) lntra-county Palo Verde Valley formula funds with Measure A Western County Highway funds; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee August 28, 2006 Page 7 12. AMENDMENT TO AGREEM NT FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION (CC V) SECURITY SYSTEMS AT METROLINK STATIONS Overview This item is for the Committ 1) Approve Agreement Agreement No. 04-25- Maintenance Services," with Inland Vault and S 2) Authorize the Chairma the Amendment to the Pg. 66 e to: o. 04-25-962-02, Amendment No. 2 to 62, "Agreement for CCTV Security Systems to amend the term and rates of the agreement curity, Inc.; , pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute greement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 13. FY 2007-11 MEASURE A Fl LOCAL STREETS AND RO NORCO AND RANCHO MIR E YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR DS FOR THE CITIES OF LAKE ELSINORE, GE Pg. 70 Overview This item is for the Committ -e to: 1) Approve the FY 2007 11 Measure A Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets .:nd Roads for the cities of Lake Elsinore, Norco and Rancho Mirage as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 14. FY 2006/07 LOCAL TRANS ORTATION FUNDS ALLOCATION FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE PALO VERDE VALLEY APPORTIONMENT AREA Overview This item is for the Committ:e to: 1) Approve the allocation local streets and roa shown on the attache 2) Forward to the Commi Pg. 92 of FY 2006/07 Local Transportation Funds for s purposes in the Palo Verde Valley area as table; and sion for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee August 28, 2006 Page 8 15. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Pg. 95 Overview 1) Adopt the following positions on statewideballot propositions: Propositions 1A & 113 — SUPPORT; 2 Direct staff to issue a Request for Qualifications for federal legislative advocacy services; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 16. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 17. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT Overview 1) This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report on attended and upcoming meeting/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. 18. ADJOURNMENT AND NEXT MEETING The next Budget and Implementation Committee meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 A.M., Monday, September 25, 2006, Board Chambers, 1s` Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. ATTENDANCE ROSTER NAME 6' BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 28, 2006 9:30 A.M. 6 C. / i REPRESENTING ,;�; 4 �— .9a R� 5 TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL # - 6/7i yD� 7n7- AGEN M • A ITEM 4 inutes RIVERS/DE COUNTY T'ANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IM'LEMENTATION COMMITTEE Monday, April 24, 2006 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Budget :nd Implementation Committee was called to order by Chair Jeff Stone at :33 a.m., in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Cen er, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Members/Alternates Present Members Absent Roger Berg Juan DeLara Rick Gibbs Barbara Hanna Terry Henderson Bob Magee John Tavaglione Jeff Stone i 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests to sp-ak from the public. 4 ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There were no additions or re isions to the agenda. 5 APPROVAL OF MINUTES —Fe ruary 27, 2006 Steve Adams Jim Ayers Alex Bias Robert Crain Ron Meepos Gregory Pettis M/S/C (Henderson/ anna) to approve the minutes of February 27, 2006 as ubmitted. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes April 24, 2006 Page 2 6. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (Henderson/Tavaglione) to approve the following Consent Calendar items: 6A. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 6B. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH WESTERNAREA SECURITY GUARD SERVICES (WASS) FOR A TWO -MONTH EXTENSION M/S/C (Henderson/Tavaglione) to: 11 Authorize a two -month extension of the current agreement with WASS; 2) Authorize a contract, amendment amount of $130,673; 3) Authorize staff to bring the contract recommendation directly to the Commission for action in June; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. 8.. RELEASE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR "ON -CALL" RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICES Min Saysay, Program Manager, provided an overview of the components of the Right -of -Way Program that will be necessary to respond in a timely and cost efficient manner to the demands of acquisitions for the future projects. Budget and Implementation Committee Min April 24, 2006 Page 3 M/S/C (Tavaglione/DeL 1) Authorize the rel of Way Services (2) Right of (3) Residential, C Appraisal Sery (5) Furniture, 16) Review Appr. and Relocation, tes ra) to: ase of Requests for Proposal for On -Call Right in the field of: (1) Title and Escrow Services; ay Engineering and Surveying Services; mmercial, Industrial, and Agricultural Property ces; (4) Goodwill Appraisal Services; ixtures and Equipment Appraisal Services; isal Services; and (7) Right of Way Acquisition Real Property Searches, Identification and Feasibility Studies for Replacement and Mitigation Sites, Cost Estimates, and U ilities Relocation; and 2) Forward to the C mmission for final action. 9. AMENDMENT TO MEMORA DUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. 23-001 FOR THE PERRIS MULTIMODAL T 'ANSIT CENTER Sheldon Peterson, Program M Multimodal Transit Center a Understanding (MOU) to inclu• of $1,050,000 in TUMF f Enhancement (TE) grant receiv nager, provided on brief overview of the Perris d the need to amend the Memorandum of e Riverside Transit Agency's (RTA) authorization nds and $1,352,472 from a Transportation d by RTA. M/S/C (Henderson/Berg) to: 1) Authorize staff t MOU No. 23-00 incorporate addit Uniform Mitiga Transportation $4,719,605; an 2) Forward to the C • 10. RECURRING CONTRACTS FO Michele Cisneros, Accountin brief overview of the schedul amend the Perris Multimodal Transit Center with the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) to onal funding of $1,050,000 of Transportation ion Fee (TUMF) and $1,352,472 of nhancement (TE) funds for a total MOU of mmission for final action. FISCAL YEAR 2006/07 and Human Resources Manager, provided a of recurring contracts for the FY 2006/07. M/S/C (Magee/Hanna) t : 1) Approve the Rec 2) Forward to the • • rring Contracts for FY 2006/07; and ommission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes April 24, 2006 Page 4 11. PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2006/07 Michele Cisneros presented the proposed Budget for FY 2005-06 highlighting the following areas:_ • Budget Process • Guiding Policies • Total Estimated Sources and Uses • Revenues, Revenue Trends and Breakdown • Expenditures, Expenditures by Department and Function • Personnel Cost Trends • Measure A Administration At Commissioner. Bob .Magee's request, Michele Cisneros clarified the two types of fund balances. In response to Commissioner Roger Berg's inquiry on expenditures related to transit, Michele Cisneros indicated that staff is projecting $7.8 million for specialized transit and $7.1 million for transit and gave a brief explanation of the uses for specialized transit. At Commissioner Terry Henderson's request for clarification on the excess of expenditures over revenue, Michele Cisneros stated expenditures are exceeding the current year revenues and therefore carryovers from prior fiscal years will be utilized, which is primarily related to capital projects. . Chair Stone recommended staff change the statement to prior budgeted amounts expended in the present fiscal year to more accurately reflect the expenditure. Commissioner Terry Henderson also recommended utilizing an alternate color to red on the Measure A Administration chart. Commissioner Berg suggested re-evaluating the transit systems on a regional basis due to the growth rate and changes in Riverside County to ensure the most efficient and effective system, noting the Transit Policy Committee is charged with this issue. Eric Haley, Executive Director, stated that the process over the next two years is going to lead directly to what Commissioner Berg was stating. There needs to be a deliberation over the proper balance between inter -community transit, specialized transit, and rail. There are efficiencies that will be discussed by the Transit Policy Committee. Budget and Implementation Committee Min April 24, 2006 Page 5 M/S/C (Henderson/Hann 1) Discuss, review for Fiscal Year IF 2) Open the public proposed FY 20 22, 2006 and cl 3) Forward to the C tes 1 to: nd provide guidance on the proposed Budget ) 2006/07; earing to receive input and comments on the 6/07 budget on May 10, 2006 and on May se the public hearing on June 14,.2006; and • mmission for final action. 12. AGREEMENT NO. 06-45-04-00 FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL TOW TRUCK SERVICE Brian Cunanan, Staff Analyst Freeway Service Patrol (FSPI indicating that Hamner Towi service commitments for this In response to Commissioner flexibility in the agreement responded that the agree adjustment as warranted. M/S/C (DeLara/Hanna) 1) Award Agreeme truck service o program at a cos 2) Authorize the execute the agre 3) Forward to the f updated the Committee on the status of the agreement for towing service on Beat No. 2, g has expressed an inability to carry out tow, eat. Terry Henderson's concern regarding sufficient to address fuel cost issues, Brian Cunanan ent allows contractors to request.. a price o: t No. 06-45-046-00 to Tri-City Towing for tow Beat No. 2 of the Freeway Service Patrol of $50.00 per hour per truck; hair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to ment on behalf of the Commission; and ommission for final action. 13. AGREEMENT NO. 06-45-050 00 WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL FOR PERATION OF THE FREEWAY CALL BOX SYSTEM FROM JULY 1, 200 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009 Jerry Rivera, Program Ma agreement with the Departm and oversight of the call box • ager, provided an overview regarding the nt of California Highway Patrol for supervision rogram. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes April 24, 2006 Page 6 M/S/C (Henderson/Berg) to approve the projections for the: 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-45-050-00 with the State of California, Department of California Highway Patrol, for the operation of the call boxsystem from July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009; 2) Authorize' the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 14. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR No items were pulled from the consent calendar for discussion. 15. COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS/STAFF At Commissioner Magee's request, Eric Haley updated the Committee on the Riverside Orange County Authority document. 16. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Budget and Implementation Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:09 a.m. The next meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee is scheduled for May 22, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the. Board 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY T'ANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IM'LEMENTATION COMMITTEE Monda , June 26, 2006 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Budget :nd Implementation Committee was called to order by Vice Chair Barbara anna at 9:33 a.m., in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administ ative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Members/Alternates Present Steve Adams Roger Berg Alex Bias Juan DeLara Rick Gibbs Barbara Hanna. Terry Henderson Bob Magee John F. Tavaglione Members Absent Jim Ayres Robert Crain Ron Meepos Gregory Pettis Jeff Stone 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests to sp ak from the pub►ic. 4. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There were no additions or re isions to the agenda. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - ay 22, 2006 M/S/C (Adams/Render on) to approve the minutes of May 22, 2006 as submitted. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 26, 2006 Page 2 6. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (Henderson/Adams) to approve the following Consent Calendar item: 6A. AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 MEASURE A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITY OF CORONA 1) Approve the amendment to the FY 2005/06 Measure 'A ,Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the city of Corona as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 7. AGREEMENT NO. 06-33-038-00 FOR RIVERSIDE -DOWNTOWN METROLINK STATION EAST SIDE PARKING LOT PROJECT Cathy Bechtel, Project Delivery Director, reviewed the recommendation to award an agreement to Hal Hays Construction, Inc. for the construction of the Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station East Side Parking Lot project. The project is estimated to be completed in early December 2006. M/S/C (Henderson/Adams) to: 1) Award Agreement No. 06-33-038-00 for the construction of the Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station East Side Parking Lot project to Hal Hays Construction, Inc. for the amount of $1,515,404 plus a contingency amount of $224,596 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total not to exceed contract authorization of $1,740,000; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Increase the project budget for Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station East Side Parking Lot project by $1,300,000 in Measure A funds and $1,300,000 in additional project 'costs and amend the Commuter Rail Short Range Transit Plan to reflect these changes; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. " a B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e M i n t e s J u n e 2 6 , 2 0 0 6 P a g e 3 8 . A W A R D O F A G R E E M E N T N O . 0 6 - 2 5 - 0 7 4 - 0 0 F O R T H E I N T E R S T A T E 1 5 C O M M U T E R R A I L F E A S I B I L I T S T U D Y S h e l d o n P e t e r s o n , P r o g r a m M . n a g e r , p r o v i d e d a n o v e r v i e w o f P h a s e I I o f t h e C o m m u t e r R a i l F e a s i b i l i t y S t d y , a n a n a l y s i s o f a p o s s i b l e c o m m u t e r r a i l s e r v i c e l i n e f r o m C o r o n a t o T e m e c u l a a n d T e m e c u l a t o S a n D i e g o . , T h e e v a l u a t i o n c o m m i t t e e r e c o m e n d e d a w a r d o f a n a g r e e m e n t t o W i l b u r S m i t h a n d A s s o c i a t e s f o r t h e 1 - 1 5 C o m m u t e r R a i l F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . C o m m i s s i o n e r B o b M a g e e e x t h i s p r o j e c t f o r w a r d . C o m m i e n g i n e e r i n g s t a f f i s a v a i l a b l e L a k e E l s i n o r e i s w i l l i n g t o a m n e e d f o r a d d i t i o n a l r i g h t - o f - w r e s s e d h i s a p p r e c i a t i o n t o t h e s t a f f f o r m o v i n g s i o n e r M a g e e s a i d t h a t h e w i l l e n s u r e h i s c i t y ' s o w o r k w i t h t h e c o n s u l t a n t . A l s o , t h e c i t y o f n d i t s G e n e r a l P l a n i f n e c e s s a r y t o a d d r e s s t h e V . M / S / C ( M a g e e / H e n d e r s " n ) t o : 1 ) A w a r d A g r e e m A s s o c i a t e s f o r t i n t h e n o t t o e x c 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e e x e c u t e t h e a g r e 3 ) A m e n d t h e F Y P l a n t o r e f l e c t t h 4 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e n t N o . 0 6 - 2 5 - 0 7 4 - 0 0 t o W i l b u r S m i t h a n d e I n t e r s t a t e 1 5 C o m m u t e r R a i l F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y e d a m o u n t o f $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ; h a i r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 C o m m u t e r R a i l S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t s s t u d y ; a n d o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . A M E N D M E N T T O A G R E E M E T F O R F I N A N C I A L A D V I S O R Y S E R V I C E S T h e r e s i a T r e v i n o , C h i e f F i n a c i a l O f f i c e r , p r o v i d e d a b r i e f o v e r v i e w o f t h e a m e n d m e n t w i t h F i e l d m a n , R . l a p p & A s s o c i a t e s t o e x t e n d i t s a g r e e m e n t f o r f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s t h r o u g h D e c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 0 9 , a n d t o r e v i s e t h e c o n s u l t a n t ' s r a t e s . M / S / C ( H e n d e r s o n / B i a s ) t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e A g r e e A g r e e m e n t N o . t o a m e n d t h e t a d v i s o r y s e r v i c e 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e e x e c u t e t h e a m e 3 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e e n t N o . 0 4 - 1 9 - 0 2 9 - 0 1 , A m e n d m e n t N o . 1 t o 4 - 1 9 - 0 2 9 , w i t h F i e l d m a n , R o l a p p & A s s o c i a t e s r m a n d r a t e s . o f t h e a g r e e m e n t f o r f i n a n c i a l h a i r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o d m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 26, 2006 Page 4 10.. INTEREST RATE SWAP Theresia Trevino provided an overview of the Commission's financing program status including amending the $500 million debt limitation. She then presented detailed information on an interest rate swap as follows: • Consideration of Interest Rate Swaps; • Current Market Yield Curve Opportunities; • Interest Rate Swap Basics; • Illustration of Typical LIBOR Swap. and LIBOR Swap Analysis; • Market Context; • Swap Risks and Mitigation; • Overview of Swap Policy; • Managing Risk Exposure; • Authority and Oversight; • Rationale for Swaps; • Identification and Evaluation of Risks; • Structuring and Execution; • Counterparty Credit Exposure; • Swap Management; and • Next Steps for a Swap Transaction. At Commissioner Terry Henderson's.request, Dan Wiles, Fieldman, Rolapp &. Associates, provided a detailed explanation as to why a counterparty would enter into an interest rate swap, noting that the market is sufficiently large and worldwide in its nature. Also, a swap .would not be allowed to change hands without the Commission's knowledge and explained the different scenarios that could occur. In response to Commissioner Alex Bias' question as to how the Commission would be affected by a dramatic market shift or a spike in inflation over a long period of time, Dan Wiles responded that, in regard to the debt on the interest rate swap arrangement, the main consideration is the differential between thefloating rate paid on the debt and the floating rate received under the contract and thevariance as rates go higher. He then provided background information and examples on the calculations made on the Bond Market Association Swap Index. Commissioner: Steve Adams concurred with the interest rate swap concept and asked how the Commission will handle the situation if rates drop dramatically. Budget and Implementation Committee Min tes June 26, 2006 Page 5 Theresia Trevino responded that there is anticipation that the rates will change. Staff is comfortable where the fixed rates are today that could be locked and accepts the fact t at rates may be lower in the future. However, the rates will not likely be dramatically lower so as to not meet the Commission's objectives. In response to Commissioner of an interest rate swap, T payment would be due and dams question regarding the early termination eresia Trevino responded that a termination epending on which way the interest rates are working, the payment could be significant. At Commissioner John Tavag ione's request, Theresia Trevino provided a list of other public agencies tha have engaged in interest rate swaps, noting that these agencies are doing this for the same purpose as staff is proposing. In response to Commissioner Tavaglione's question regarding how long the program has been in existenc and its success history, Robert Porr, Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, stated that municipal swaps began occurring in the early 1990's with no negativ: experiences to report. In response- to Commission r Henderson's concern regarding an annual review of financial statement., Theresia Trevino stated that from a financial reporting standpoint, the A dit Ad Hoc Committee would look at the disclosure of the termination alue in the notes to the financials statements. An experienced third party f rm would be hired to do the calculations and review the monthly settleme ts. The auditors review the work done by that firm. Commissioner Bob Magee c.mmended Theresia Trevino for an exceptional presentation on interest r to swaps. He then requested additional information relative to the co t of termination. Robert Porr stated that the to mination value of a swap is going to change as interest rates change and could fluctuate by about 10% - 12% of the notional amount of the swap noting that 99% of swaps are in place for the entire life that was agree4 upon. The Commission is looking at a 20-year term. Commissioner Rick Gibbs ex.ressed support for interest rate swaps to assist the Commission with its fina cing program. In response to Commissioner Henderson's inquiry regarding a review of the calculations, Theresia Trevin. and Eric Haley indicated that a report will be presented to the Commission on a quarterly basis. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 26, 2006 Page 6 M/S/C (Tavaglione/Adams) to: 1) Approve the Riverside County Transportation Commission Swap Policy and revisions to the Debt Management Policy; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 06-014, A Resolution of the Riverside . County Transportation Commission Regarding the Swap Policy and Revised Debt Management Policy'; 3►, Direct staff to develop and issue a solicitation for a request for proposals for one or more variable -to -fixed interest rate forward starting swap transactions related to a total notional amount of $185,000,000; 4) Approve Agreement No. 07-19-011-00 with Fieldman Rolapp Financial Services, LLC to provide swap advisory services; 5) Approve Agreement No. 05-19-510-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 05-19-510, with Orrick, Flemington, & Sutcliffe LLP to amend the scope of services and related compensation related to legal services related to the execution of a swap transaction; 6) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the Agreements on behalf of the Commission; 7) Adopt Resolution No. 06-015, "A Resolution of the Riverside. County Transportation Commission Authorizing the Execution of a Swap'; 8) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to bond counsel review, to execute the swap transaction documents,; including the International Swap and Derivatives Association, Inc: (ISDA) Master Agreement (Local Currency -Single Jurisdiction) (Copyright 1992), as amended by a Schedule and Credit Support Annex, with the successful counterparties; and, 9) Forward to the Commission for final action. 11. FISCAL YEAR 2007/11 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS Jerry Rivera, Program Manager, briefly reviewed the FY 2007/11 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads, noting that not all of the cities have submitted the required documents. He also noted that since the mailing of the agenda; the City of Banning submitted its plans. Budget and Implementation Committee Min June 26, 2006 Page 7 M/S/C (Henderson/Tava 1) Approve the F Improvement Pla and 2) Forward to the C 12. FY 2006/07 SB 821 BICYC FUNDING RECOMMENDATIO Jerry Rivera presented the Facilities Program funding re ranked by the evaluation com In response to Commissioner none of the city of Beaumo Jerry Rivera replied that he submitted by the committee respond to his concern. Commissioner Berg requested that did not qualify for fun SB 821 proposals. Commissioner Magee stated situation two years ago. Co provide a better understandin Elsinore has successfully rec recommended that Commissi Commission staff. Commissioner Berg disagreed have been previous issues information as to why Beau may have been wrong. Eric Haley noted that Commi comings of its proposal and extended an offer for Com review its proposals. Commissioner Berg expresse proposal properly and can information provided. tes lione) to: 2007/11 Measure A Five Year Capital s for Local Streets and Roads as submitted; mmission for final action. E AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM S Y 2006/07 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian ommendations, noting that the projects were ittee based on the adopted criteria. Berg's concern regarding the criteria and why is projects were recommended for funding, would review the individual scoring sheets members on city of Beaumont's projects and additional information be provided for projects ing in order to assist the cities with future hat the city of Lake Elsinore was in a similar mission staff met with Lake Elsinore staff to of the criteria. As a result, the city of Lake wed funding for a number of its projects. He ner Berg direct Beaumont staff to work with with Commissioner Magee as he believes there with the criteria. He requested additional ont's proposal were scored so low and what sioner Magee did request specifics and short staff was specific in its response. He then ssion staff to meet with Beaumont staff to concerned that his city isn't preparing the of make that determination based on the Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 26, 2006 Page 8 Eric Haley stated that staff will review this matter with Commissioner Berg's concerns in mind. Commissioner Alex Bias concurred with Commissioner Berg's concerns as he is not familiar with the scoring process. He requested staff support in understanding the criteria for future project submittals as his city's projects were not. approved to receive funding. Commissioner Tavaglione stated that this is a very competitive process and proper and sufficient preparation of the proposal is critical to receiving funding. The evaluation committee also allows all applicants to present their proposals to the committee and answer questions from the members. He encouraged the Commissioners to discuss with their staffs the importance of the preparation of its submittals. M/S/C (He,nderson/Tavaglione) to: 1) Approve the FY 2006/07 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program recommended funding as shown on the attached schedule; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. No: Berg, Bias 13. AWARD OF STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY AGREEMENT John Standiford, Public Affairs Director, provided an overview of the state legislative advocacy services and selection process. The evaluation . committee recommended award of an agreement to Smith, Watts & Company for these services. M/S/C (Henderson/Tavaglione) to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-14-076-00 for State ' Legislative Advocacy Services to Smith, Watts & Company; . 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and. 3) Forward to the Commission for final action Budget and Implementation Committee Min tes June 26, 2006 Page 9 14. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGIS ATIVE UPDATE John Standiford announce U.S. Secretary of Transporta this further diminishes Calif provided an overview and up the retirement of Norman Y. Mineta, ion, in August 2006. There is a concern that rnia influences in Washington D.C. He then ate on HR 5576, HR 4939, AB 1699, and a bond workshop being held by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and Ca!trans. Commissioner Tavaglione ex. legislative reports. He discu domain and its potential imp public entities take this iss California Cities and Californi initiative could severely impac ressed his appreciation for staffs work on the sed the Anderson initiative related to eminent act on public entities. He recommended all e very seriously and work with League of State Association of Counties (CSAC) as this the bond infrastructure projects. John Standiford responded that a full analysis on the Anderson initiative will be presented to the Commission at its next meeting. M/S/C (Adams/Henders• n) to: 1) Adopt the follow ng bill position: AB 1699 (From er, D-Glendale) OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED (Change in Positi. n); 2) Receive and file : s an information item; and 3) Forward to the commission for final action. 15. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONS:NT CALENDAR No items were pulled from th consent calendar for discussion. 16. COMMENTS BY COMMISSIO ERS/STAFF Commissioner Henderson no school buses. There may be assessment on the potential public transit. ed that schools are charging students to ride a correlation worth looking into and making an reduction in traffic that could be made with Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 26, 2006 Page 10 17. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Budget and Implementation Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:58 a.m. The next meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee is scheduled for August 28, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board AGEN A ITEM 6A RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: August 28, 2006 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Interfund Loan Activity Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) 21 Receive and file the I terfund Loan Activity Report for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2006; and Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On April 14, 2004 the Commission Resolution No. 04-009 "Resoluti Commission to Authorize lnterfu requested that the interfund loan attached details list all interfund to outstanding interfund loan amounts pproved the Interfund Loan Policy and adopted .n of the Riverside County Transportation d Loans". Subsequently, the Commission ctivity be reported on quarterly basis. The n activity through June 30, 2006. The total ;s of June 30, 2006 are $575,000. Attachment: Interfund Loan Activit Report 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission Interfund Loan Activity Report For 4th quarter ended June 30, 2006 Amount Maturity Date of Loan of Loan Date Lending Fund Borrowing Fund April 2, 2003 $ 300,000 July 1, 2006 Measure A - WC Highway (222) Measure A - WC LSR (227) March 4, 2004 275,000 July 1, 2009 Measure A- WC Commuter Assistance (226) Total $ 575,000 Purpose of Loan Advance to make repairs and improvements to Railroad Canyon Road Measure A - WC Highway (222) Additional local match for the SR71 Widening/Animal Crossing Project Date Commission Approved March 12, 2003 December 10, 2003 - V:12006109 SeptemberSud9et & ImplementatIon1MCAtlach.Loan Activity Rpt AGEN • A ITEM 66 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: August 28, 2006 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chef Financial Officer SUBJECT: Single Signature Authority Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Si gle Signature Authority Report for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commision for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The attached report details all prof ssional services and administrative contracts that have been executed for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2006 under the Single Signature Authority granted o the Executive Director by the Commission. The unused capacity at June 30, 206 is $223,441. Attachment: Single Signature Autho ity Report as of June 30, 2006 SINGLE SIGNA AUTHORITI AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 CONSULTANT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES ORIGINAL CONTRACT REMAINING AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT CONTRACT AMOUNT AMOUNT AVAILABLE July 1, 2005 $500,000.00 SCAG Amendment # 1 for travel demand analysis 12,235.00 0.00 12,235.00 for San Jacinto branch linen-215 corridor study Advanced Marketing Commuter assistance mail -house fulfillment 25,000.00 18,593.20 6,406.80 services MHV Enterprises, Inc. Amendment # 3 software development 24,000.00 18,750.00 5,250.00 programming & support services MBI Media Video Services - RCTC Video 40,000.00 26,752.92 13,247.08 ERA Riverside County Land Value Trends 28,000.00 28,000.00 0.00 Caporiccl & Larson Audit Consulting Services for Sunline Transit 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 Agency Bartel Associates Strategic Consulting and Research Keyser. Marston Associates, Inc. Douglas Wood and Associates AMOUNT USED and section 5310 program'-` Actuarial valuation for Post -employee.: Medical 6,000.00 5,900.00 100.00 Benefits under GASB 45'r Professional service agreement to preform a25,000.00 10,578.62 14,421.38 Commuter Assistance incentive study Finance Consultant for La Sierra Joint 49,500.00 12,507.85 36,992.15 Development Selection Consulting services agreement for Arantine. 25,210.00 0.00 25,210.00 Hills Land Use Study AMOUNT USED, net of adjustments AMOUNT REMAINING through JUNE 30, 2006 Towa Reabroi-DeMorst Michele Cisneros Prepared by Reviewed by Note: Shaded area represents new contracts listed in the third quarter. 276,559.00 276,559.00 $223,441.00 160,915.44 115,643.56 V.\2006\09 Seplember1Budget & Implementation\TT.RCTC.Attach.4th Qtr Single Signature AGEN A ITEM 6C 1 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: August 28, 2006 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Quarterly Financial Statements STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) 2) Receive and file the uarterly Financial Statements for the twelve- month period endedJu e 30, 2006; and Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: During the past fiscal year, sta expenditures of the Commission. revenues received and expenditur adjustments for revenue and expen are reflected in these financial state year end accrual adjustments de 2006. The financial statements show the the budget. The accounting for Governmental Accounting Standard requires sales tax revenue to be acc State Board of Equalization collects Commission after the reporting pe month lag in the receipt of reven financial statements reflect the rev through June 2006. The .final accr payment, which includes the fourth On a cash basis, the Measure A an the same period last fiscal year. f has closely monitored the revenues and The attached financial statements show the s incurred during the fiscal year. Accrual itures have been made for June 30, 2006 and ents. The Commission will continue to make ending upon materiality through August 31, ales tax revenue for the fiscal year at 101 % of ales tax revenues is in accordance with the Board (GASB) Statement No. 33. GASB 33 ued for the period in which it is collected. The the Measure A funds and remits them to the iod for the businesses. This creates a two - es by the 'Commission. Accordingly, these nues related to the collections. from July 2005 al of revenue will be made once the September uarter clean-up adjustment is received. LTF sales tax revenues are 15% higher than The Commission did not .receive the full budgeted amount of Federal,. State, and . Local revenues as these revenues are realized on a reimbursement basis.. As project costs for the State Route (SR) 60 East Junction to Interstate 215 HOV, SR 91 HOV, SR-79 Realignment Study, and the Perris Valley Line are incurred, staff will invoice the respective agencies: Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues were remitted 'to the Commission by Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). During the fiscal year, WRCOG _ remitted TUMF of $57,907,533 to the Commission. The TUMF remittances reflect an increase of 25% over the same -period last year. Other revenues are significantly higher than budgeted due to the sale of Commission property in February 2006. The Commission sold the Pierce Street property .for $10.25 million. The proceeds from the sale_ were deposited into the Western County Measure A Rail Program. Investment income is higher than budgeted due to the higher cash investments balances and their related yields. The Administrative and Program/Project expenditure categories were under budget by $368,004.and $168,652,220 respectively. Listed below are the capital related projects that have significant variances and their status: Highway Engineering/Right of Way/Land • State Route (SR) 91 Van Buren Interchange ($7,600,0001—The city of Riverside is the lead agency and has experienced delays related to environmental issues. The environmental process is complete pending public comments. Right of way acquisition will commence in FY 2006/07. Construction will not commence for 18 months and the city requested, and the Commission approved, amending the Measure A Strategic Plan to allow the ,Van Buren funds to be used for the construction phase of the La, Sierra interchange scheduled for spring 2007. SR-91 HOV Lanes between Adams Street and Th Street ($18,300,000)—The Commission is awaiting final approval of the environmental document and geometric approval drawings in order to commence the final design phase currently forecasted for the second quarter in FY2006/07.' • SR-79 Realignment ($7,010,000)—Engineering delays were caused by requests from resource agencies to study new avoidance alternative 6 alignments. Technical reports are being developed while waiting to procure encroachment permits to perform geotechnical investigations. An amendment to the contract was required hich resulted in the need for a preaward audit prior to the issuance of a notice to proceed. • SR-74 G Street to Interstate (I) 215 ($1,450,000)—The Commission is awaiting completion of the traffic studies in order to commence the preliminary and environmental •hase of work. Acquisition of right of way will not start until FY 2006/07. • , SR-74 from 1-15 to 7th Street ($4,250,000) —The County of Riverside (County) continues to negotiat with parcel owners to acquire the property needed to complete the mitiga ion requirements of the project. In addition, funding has been allocated to over settlements through state condemnation for those properties acquired th ough eminent domain. • SR-60 East Junction to 1-215 OV (52,887,700)Caltrans has approved the project to proceed with the 'inal design. Funding authorization from the Federal Highway Administration is pending. • 1-215 Project Study Report ($50,000) - Project is currently on hold pending completion of the traffic model • Commercial Paper Projects remain available for right of w mitigation as opportunities $55,000,000 included in the due to the balance of unexpend Highway Construction nalysis. $43,700,000) Commercial paper proceeds y and land acquisition related to projects and arise; however, the second traunche of udget as bond proceeds has not been issued d proceeds as of June 30, 2006. • 1-15 Cantu-Galleano Ranch 'oad Interchange ($2,700,000)—The County recently awarded the construc ion contract. Construction began in February 2006 with an estimated 18 mo th construction period. • SR-74 from 1-15 to 7th Street ( 14,300,000)—The prior year's winter rainfalls caused delays in construction and utility relocation. Delivery of oil base material for asphalt caused additional delays, and construction was completed in August 2006. • SR-60 ($1,558,200)—Project i. complete; however, punch list items are still being reviewed, and final pay ent will be released upon settlement of claims. Additionally, the plant establishment that was delayed due to the prior year's rainfalls is now complete and the project has been accepted by Caltrans. • SR-111 ($1,311,600)—The widening project in the city of La Quinta was awarded, and construction was completed in May 2006. The Commission recently received a progress payment invoice from the city. The city of Indio will commence its project October 2006. The city of Rancho Mirage submitted an invoice for the completed Magnesia Falls project in June 2006 for $1,000,000 as part of the terms of an agreement with the Commission. • Commercial Paper Projects ($17,648,400)—Commercial paper proceeds remain available for construction related to projects as 'opportunities arise; however, the second traunche of $55,000,000 included in the budget as bond proceeds has not beenissued due to the balance of unexpended proceeds as of June 30, 2006. Rail Engineering/Right of Way/Land • North Main Corona Station Parking Structure ($1,100,000)-The CEQA environmental document was approved, and the NEPA environmental document was prepared and submitted for approval to the federal Transit Administration. Funding to proceed with the start of final design has been appropriated and a consultant agreement was awarded in March 2006. • Perris Valley Line ($10,791,000)—Preliminary engineering contract award was rescheduled for the first quarter in FY 2006/07. Additionally, property acquisition had been postponed as a result of the delay in the NEPA environmental document due to the revision of the ridership analysis. The New Starts application will be complete once concurrence is received on the final ridership analysis. • Riverside Downtown Eastside Parking Lot ($375,000) - Delays in final design occurred due to requirements for preparing and submitting engineering and planning applications to the city to obtain permits. Engineering drawings were finalized, the RFP process was completed, and the construction contract was awarded in July 2006. • Rail Stations ($60,000)—Estimates for potential rehabilitation projects were included in the budget. Staff is developing a station rehabilitation plan to. monitor costs going forward • Rail Construction • Riverside Downtown Eastside design have occurred due to th the engineering/planning ap Accordingly, the start of const of FY 2006/07. arking Lot ($1,735,000)—Delays in the final, requirements for preparation and submittal of ication to the city to obtain permits. uction has been delayed until the first, quarter • Rail Stations ($354,000)—Esti ates for potential rehabilitation projects were included in the budget. Staff is developing a station rehabilitation plan to monitor costs going forward. TUMF En•ineenn of Wa /L. nd • Mid County Parkway ($19,10 consultant was received, an engineering was approved an 2005. Work progress has be performed and the review of ju Staff continues to have ong developers to try to reserve cor ,000)—Approval of the preaward audit for the Amendment #2 for Phase II preliminary a notice to proceed was issued December n slowed by various alternative analysis being isdictional delineation and assessment reports. ing discussions with local jurisdictions and idor right of way. Various Western County TU F Regional Arterial Projects ($33,145,400)— Agreements for more than half •f the projects have been signed with the cities and County. These agencies a e now in the process of preparing requests for • proposal to award contracts. ommission staff will continue to actively work with the agencies to have agre: ments signed for the remaining projects. TUMF Construction • SR-91 Green River Interchang been committed by the Commi and begin construction in FY 2 ($3,114,600) - Funding for the project has sion and Ca!trans. The project will be awarded 06/07. • Various Western County TUMRegional Arterial Projects ($13,097,500)—No construction activities on approved regional arterial projects will occur until the final design phases are complet-d and environmental documents are approved. Intergovernmental distributions are expended as one-time LTF payments made at the beginning of the fiscal year b sed on claims submitted by Coachella Valley Association of Governments and RCOG. Unused funds in this category are related to planning and programmindepartmental expenditures. • Capital outlay expenditures are under budget due to unexpended authority for potential office improvements to the computer server room. Staff expects these improvements to take place in FY2006/07. Additional commercial paper notes were not issued during FY2005/0.6, resulting in the variances in bond proceeds and cost of issuance. Attachment: Quarterly Financial Statements - June 30, 2006 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 4TH QUARTER FOR TWELVE MONTHS ENDED 6130/2006 DESCRIPTION Revenues Sales tax Federal, state & local government reimbursements Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Other revenues Interest Total revenues Expenditures Administration Salaries & benefits General legal services Professional services Office lease & utilities General administrative expenditures Total administration Programs/projects Salaries & benefits General legal services Professional services General projects Highway engineering Highway construction Highway right of way/land Rail engineering Rail construction Rail right of way TUMF engineering TUMF construction TUMF right of way Local streets & roads Regional arterial Special studies FSP towing Commuter assistance Property management Motorist assistance Rail operations & maintenance STA distributions Specialized transit Planning & programming services Total programs/projects Intergovernmental distribution Capital outlay Debt service Principal Interest Arbitrage rebate tax Cost of issuance Total debt service Total expenditures Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources/uses Operating transfer in Operating transfer out Bond proceeds Payment to escrow agent Total financing sources/uses Net change in fund balances Fund balance July 1, 2005 Fund balance June 30, 2006 n,gerepreor:,u„dpuar ,ater ptoneny REMAINING PERCENT BUDGET ACTUAL BALANCE UTILIZATION 159,753,428 $ 161,823,021 $ 2,069,593 101% 43,608200 5.179,179 (38,429,021) 12% 45,825,000 57, 907,534 12,082,534 126% 8,045,952 18,821,434 10,775,482 234% 5,453,600 8,461,004 3,007,404 155% 262,686,180 252,192,172 (10,494,008) 96% 1,615,900 1,545,841 70,059 96% 111,500 110,354 1.146 99% 1,084,200 1,065,989 18,211 98% 375,000 327,065 47,935 87% 1,142,200 911,547 230,653 80% 4,328,800 3,960,796 368,004 91% 2,276,600 2,101,748 174,852 92% 1,685,000 1,458,216 226,784 87% 3,241,999 1,870,469 1,371,530 - 58% 3,177,200 2,518,035 659,165 79% 24,701,260 7,729,858 16,971,402 31% 40,241,200 13,108,764 27,132,436 33% 55,572,700 11,624,725 43,947,975 21% 6,965,700 835,316 6.130,384 12% 2,089,000 230,227 1,858,773 11% 5,050,000 - 5,050,000 0% 26,125.385 8,666,391 17,458,994 33% 16 212,100 782,171 15,429,929 5% 26,120,000 2,298,146 23,821,854 9% 60,919,640 57,921,212 2,998,428 95% 10,350,500 10,350,500 - 100% 2,251,600 1,525,519 726,081 68% 1,446,480 1,433,470 13,010 99% 2,765,000 2,216,647 548,353 80°% 110,300 79,792 30,508 72% 2,297,844 622,320 1,675,524 27% 7,042,900 6,725,792 317,108 95% 5,967,000 4,037,298 1,929,702 68% 5,087,731 4,922,501 165,230 97% 50,800 36,602 14,198 72% 311,747,939 143,095,719 168,652,220 46 % 1,903,628 1,092,091 811,537 57% 429,000 290,461 138,539 68% 28,669,500 28,640,000 29,500 100% 8,109,100 7,677,066 432,034 95% 236,100 236,058 42 100% 400,000 - 400,000 0% 37,414,700 36,553,124 861,576 98% - 355,824,067. 184,992,191 170,831,876 52% (93,137,887) 67,199.981 160,337,868 72% 46,561,500 34,012,133 (12,549,367) 73% 46,561,500 34,012,133 12,549,367 73% 55,000,000 - (55,000,000) 0% - 0% 55,000,000 - (55,000,000) 0% (38,137,887) 67,199,981 105,337,868 -176% 230,537,100 279,262,635 48,725,535 121% 192,399,213 $ 346,462,616 $ 154,063,403 180% 11 EEL'6 L0'02 08 EEL'ZLO'PE 9Z0'ZLO'bE -' LDL 9 L9'Z9899E $ ZELL'40E'OE $ 99Z'990'ZL $ 4LL'90L $ lL[996'141 $ 609'68L'9 S 9LL'Z69'OL S 991'LS S 6869L099L S 0499E9'4 $ OL9'E99'L S 9E939Z'6LZ ZL41868Z 6E3E91)'SZ LS300L L9686 L'L9 OLE'£04 (9LVLOV'El) E9C9 60CCL3E9 Z L9'ZS9'L9 $6£866'£ 060'L6E98 0[8'64 646'9489£L 003E0E4. 094'02S'9 9914E93L 9Z$'9E£'Z 98L'L 00L'990'6Z 948E£L (066'968) 9006'0£ 0,07 600e189 puns 6002L 688 93081E1 Puni 8898688 purl u1 980840leN 906.1 LO'bE - - LDL" - - (POOB69'L) - (649'ELL '9Z) - - s8e8/894.9499(4948880 ploy 9.868 ma05a 0) LuaaAed spe800.61 006 9044868'L - 699'£1-149Z - - - Ino JeJsueq&Naketl0 sasn/seo/nos 6ulpueu0 /800 L96'66 LL9 (908908EE) (4LE'LOb£L) 990'9 21-8Z99'L4 4914E99'L Z£0'4EZ'OL 99L'l 69L'L81-'59- 945££L (0L6'969) 8e8888u80286epun) JOAO BenueAW 888483 LB L'Z66'49L O23E99 SE 910'ZEZ'VL 64£'ZEE'ZL E9b'LEO'9 LLO'E69'EZ ZLO'OSO'L 46Z'6L9'LL DL9'MO Z- 6EZ'LEO'9L . sanHpuedxe 18101 bZL'8689E DZ3E94'SE 949'EC9 - - 9508£6 e41N0$MP 18101 - - - - - - - - - - - 80868sH JOLsoO 950'9EZ - - - - - - - - 1160'9EZ 4e181e98i 8128996$ 990'LL9'L 062'849'9 940'£E8 - - - - - - - - - 1881809 000'099'8Z 000'099'92 - - Ie8p0118 8916eas Ma 199'06Z - - - - - - - OL39E2 909'8 99E'LS Aer°leHd80 l60'600'l - - - - - - - - 163Z604 uglnp1401P 1eL0ewaeA08181p1 6 LL'960'EVL - 6£6'EOL'EL 668ZE861- £90'L£0'4 LL0'£69936 ZL0'050'L LI1L'Z9b'LL 00E'SLVZ 208909COL 810a(01d/BL681601d18101 209'9E - - - - - - - - - 609 9� E seelNes Bulwwa6ad g 086081d LOS'ZZ6'1, - - - - - 6l6'49L'E - Z99'LSL'L - - LI8461 p888818981$' 866 6903/ - - - - 96Z'1E0'4 - - - - - - 8ugIn0VW1p V19 E6L'SZL'9 - - - - - 66L'S2L3 aoueualul8w g suomado 888 Una - - - - - OZE'2Z9 - 508818688111/01001 Z6L'6L - - - - - nig/ lue9.e688ew Ape80/d L49'9LZ'Z - - - - - - /49'9 6'Z - - sauelslsse Joinwwoo 0L4'6E6'L - - - - - - - - OL4'9E9'L - Bulmul dES 6 L3S291L 9$9'9Z - - E4E'EBE - L69'9414 mono moods 006'069'0L - - 00305801 - 18081-1e leugfiay Z L2'1-60 LS - - - - LE3690'EL L6L'640'L 060'L09'£9 - 81180J 9 88841 189101 99L'96Z'Z - - - 94L'06Z'Z - - - - - - 4604081811A18101 L[CNC - - - LLC 68L - - - - - - uopon94809 Amu L6£'999'8 - - - L6E'999'0 - - - - - 600a498088 AWOL - - - - - - - - AOm 10146p Hey LZZO£Z - - - - - - L22'DE2 - - 60908A8000 Hey 91-E'6E9 - - - - - 91-£'9£8 - - 5868e18680 Hey 96Z9Z(I'LL - 696'92. ZL - - - - - (093 WO - - pue8A)6m10196) Aem6016 99f90L'EL - - - - - LSWZ8Z'L - EL CLIZ0'LL - uo0088L986 A2494D!H 859'62LL - - - - - L9E'991 - L64'E99L - - - 13800e6619) 68461616 6E0'91-S'Z - - - LL9'90L - ££E'04 - 52(22££'2 - - spe(ad 96800 6944O63L - 9E8655 E99'L 69L 956'369 9ZZ4-2 616'6E9 MI NOS 113110MOJad 918'899'L - 19L 90 - LEO'OBZ 960 LZZ L00'696 90949L $98'Lin $808L88 Is8a11usuo0 89L'IOCZ - - - 990'89L - EBZ'8L 89L'699 9E9'00 - E6Z46Ll'i s0leuea g SBpeIBS slsalad/swafimd 996'090'6 1.60'96Z - - - - - - 99L'bL1 LI/6'064'E 80H698998)e 18101 LPS'L 16 - - - - - - L59'Eb 988[99 88/89p861888898408801e1e180e0 S98LZE - - - - - - - 16L'61- 89Z'LLE 8e1H190 g 018818980 686'990'L - SEL'E6Z - - - - - 0681/E 99E41EL sealNes leugsseJad 8980L1. - 99E'L - - - - - 0686 8L9'EOL senguesle69118/eue0 L48'Sbs'L - - - - 9060L SE69OL6'l mous('g sepeleg 001191168.upV 110.0.1116661103 ZLL'Z6CZ9Z 9891/L8'L 605949 990'9 L96'490'66 ' 4.430089 E01'LZ6'9E 96L'LSO' L 090'112396L 912'989'6 )996'91114 89108990/19101 400'L99'0 409'6/28L Z1)89Z9 990'9 LZgLLO'Z LBZ'80L 9L9'16L 900'Z LEO'LOVE 88E'LOL 9406L26 lsaelul ' bEb'21:891. - - - 09E'ZBL'9 640'0E9'1 - ZOL'L90'1.1 (S99'L)-Z69'699 senue4816689 bES'LWL6 - - 4ES'LO6'LS - - - - (dW01) eei u01188HIW uuooun 009800dsue1l 6AL'6LL'S - - - - - 9998986 469'099'2 606'969 Hu9w98m9098/ 7uewaen061ea01$ e18l8 ye(aped L8E8E88691 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 48E'90EY£ S L6L'600'L $ SLO'set'OLL $ $ 4£069ZLZL $ -Km 8818$ senueney 1V101 3016636 NV6001M N01100y1SN00 31681 3010V16183g ' A311VA A311VA kmn00 3AVS ONn4 NOI1d180930 0341188100 1830 83dVd A1Nn00 33i NOLLVOI11W 11661261 V1131-10V00 30)13A 61.131831.1 MS1 11,631.138 1V0183168/00 11831$3M WBOAINO NOI1V180dSNV81 311216 OIVd v 38nsv3W 90/0E8 C130013 SHINOW 361328160i 831yVO0 H10 O NOd A9 sivniaV Al/33161M NOISSIWW00 NOLLV180d9NV81A1Nn00 3016413A18 ACEN A ITEM 6D " R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T N S P O R T A T / O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : A u g u s t 2 8 , 2 0 0 6 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e F R O M : T h e r e s i a T r e v i n o , C i e f F i n a n c i a l O f f i c e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : Q u a r t e r l y I n v e s t m e n R e p o r t S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : 1 ) R e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e Q u : r t e r l y I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t f o r t h e q u a r t e r e n d e d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 6 ; a n d 2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : A t t a c h e d a r e t h e q u a r t e r l y i n v e s t m j l a w a n d C o m m i s s i o n p o l i c y . T h e C J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 6 i s a l s o a t t a c h e d f o r r A t t a c h m e n t s : 1 ) Q u a r t e r l y I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t f r t h e Q u a r t e r e n d e d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 6 2 ) C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e I n v e s t m e t R e p o r t f o r t h e M o n t h e n d e d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 6 n t a n d c a s h f l o w r e p o r t s a s r e q u i r e d b y s t a t e u n t y ' s I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t f o r t h e m o n t h e n d e d v i e w . 1 3 V.VYL N tura of iuuasnrauts ortfollo Maturity Po olio Investment Typa l ra 5 iv Bills State ent of Compliance tl e.al AVmncy Nctva 11.4 Ye _Mulusl Funtla ti.4?6 All of the above investments and an investment decisions made for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 were in full complia ce with the Commission's investment policy as adopted on March 8, 2006. The Commission has adequate cash fl ws for six months of operations. Signed by Chic Financial Officer 14 }; E. ;!! MrgiPlEgEWMqM UMU egg»!\\!eg! R#A#!/pAg# 225g: #4 ] ] { 15 1 County Administrative Center Investment Objectives I • Safety of Principal • Liquidity • Public Trust • Maximum Rate of Return Treasurer's Comme tary "The Flight of Icarus?" The core Consumer Pric second consecutive month, higher annualized rate of 2.4%to go with the "comfort zone" of investors, an quickly extinguished speculation a rates. In fact, since it appears tha to speculate, some commentators 50 basis points instead of the cus the Fed Funds Future markets. The Fed,did indeed rai ment language ever so slightly: t sures remain. Investors accusto Index reported on June 14 was .3% for the ha the expected .2%: This translates to an n annualized CPI of 4.2%., well outside of lysts and policy makers. These revelations out whether the Fed was finished raising Fed -watchers have plenty of time and love egan to suggest that the Fed might raise mary.25%, mirroring immediate changes in e 25 bps. to 5.25°% but modified _its state e economy is cooling, but inflationary pres- ed to reading the Fed's tea leaves saw. this as a sign of the "end -times" for th- rate -hike cycle, reflected in a drop in bond • yields and a jump in stock market indices. Further complicating matters, how- ever, was the subsequent release rf economic data showing anemic job growth (indicating an economic downturn in hourly wages (indicating-possibl to favor its inflation -fighting mand along with a higher -than -expected increase inflation). Since historically the Fed seems to over its maximum employment directive, at least one more rate increase se ms in store. Thus, while the profess onal prognosticators, after envisioning cycle peaks in the 4.5-5°% range, vigorously revise their predictions, the question remains: when is the end? How hit h is too high? Would the Fed push rates up so high that the American economy comes crashing down in a heap of feathers and melted wax?. Only time will tel . �c %HCNNU� U Paul McDonnell Treasurer -Tax Collector June 2006 ---- I, Durable Goods Orders -for June 23rd' - -.3%actual vs. .4%survey , Gross Domestic Product (GDP)-ferlune 29th 5.6% actual vs. 5.6%survey Consumer Confidence— Index -June 27th 105.7 actual vs. 104.0 survey ; Factory Orders- July 5th .7% actual vs..1%survey Unemployment Rate- for JuIY 7th • 4.6% actual vs. 4.7%survey ' At month's end, the Fed Funds rate was 5.25%, with a balanced bias. The 2 year T-Note was yielding 5.15% (up 12 bp.) while the 10 year T-Note was yielding 5.14°% (up 2 bps.) For May the Pool had an increase of 5 bps. in the average monthly yield. Portfolio Statistics 'rvbnth-End Book Value $ 4,104,307,007 ;Month End Market Value $ 4,084,159,627 "Paper Gain or (Loss) $ (20,147,380)( $ Percent of Paper Gain or Loss-0.49%, Yield Based Upon Book Value 4.461 IWeghted Average Maturity (Yrs) 0 79 !Modified Duration . e .. 0.76 'Market values does not include accrued interest 4,043,530,8'8 1 $ 4,524,361,983 1 $ 3,747,481,599 4 024,176,2427 $ 4,505,859,884 $ 3,727,832,699 (19,354,636)1 $ (18,502_099)1 $ (19,648,900) - 043%-0.41%1 -0.52% 441 080_ on_ 4.28 _ _._. 4.10 0.72 .. _ _. _ ...,,... 0.82 $ 0.69 0.78j- 3,709,956,618 $ 3,686,186,292 3,690,904,657 $ 3,668,478,601 j (19051,961) $ (1770769'V 0.51%r 3.99;- .3.90, _0.821 0.801 0.791 THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED INVESTMENT FUND IS CURRENTLY RATED: y- Aaa/MR1 BY MOODY'S INVESTOR SERVICES AAA/V1+ BY FITCH RATINGS 0.771 16 Portfolio Characteristics SECTOR Federal Agency Cash Equivalent & MMF' Commercial Paper_ Negotiable CD's Medium Term Notes Municipal. Bonds. Certificates of Deposit Local Agency Obligation Total Caen Eq uivai an; 8 1.62% M aricet Value 2,564,316,283 66,000,000 671,562,094 688,007,242 39,698,860 32,84 ,149 20,000,000-. 1,735, 000 4,084,159,627 CREDIT QUALITY' Federal Agency AAA A-1/ P-lor better N/R Total 1,78% Market Value 2,564,316,283 72,539,009 1, 359, 569, 335 87,735,000 4,084,159,627 _ Federal Agency 62.79%. MATURITY -. _ ....,_...._._.L_. 30 days orr Less ` 30 - 90Days 90 Days - 1Year 1-2 Years 2 - 3 Years Over 3 Years Total M arket Valu- 628,508,801.94 939,824,906.76 1,238,974,535.60 769,591,363.75 505,525,018.90 1,735,000.00 4,084,159,627 12 Month Gross Yield Trends Page 2 Market Data 6/30/06 5/31/06 Diff. 3 M 4.976 4.833 .1427 6 M 5.230 5.062 .1677 2 Y 5.150 r . 5.033 . '.1 168 5 Y 5.093 5.032 .9603 10 Y 5.136 5.119 .0178 30 Y 5.186 5.228 -.0418 3140 6M0 2YR 5YR- 16YR KYR * Treasurer's Institutional Money Market Index (TIMM!) is compiled and reported by the Riverside County Treasurer's Capital Markets division. It is a composite index derived from the average of three multi -billion dollar AAA rated Prime (funds that invest in a diversified portfolio of U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments includ- ing U.S. Treasuries, government agencies, bankers' acceptances, commercial' paper, certificates of deposits, repurchase agreements, etc.) portfolios that the Treasurer tracks. Further details available upon request. 17 Month End Portfolio Holdings Report \ yyRR22 • \\ /bJthth th \ \\\E E 5, 000,000.00 FHIB- MORTG. CER s,W0,000.00 FHlB-MORTG. CER | \ \ 7 Month End Portfolio Holdings Report • • • Treasurers Pooled Investment Fund June 30, 200E Month End Portfolio Holdings Report CUSIP ..-trdrrnix DESCRIPTION sr 3136F7370 1000000000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.3YrNc 3136F7PP6 500090000 FED NAT 3136F7PP5 500000000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC37rNc1Yr Wi0465tUReIM:r QO24i: 1 Abi�1e.-. 3136770ND-10000,00000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC ,3YMc1Tr1X :15t-it ag.g.3. -0.03. ORTG ASSOC.3YrNc1`61 COUPON MATURITY 'BOOK VALUE' .ao n/zuz008aoe 3135984E74 - 5,000,00000 FED NAT MORTO ASSOC 3VrNctDO1X 5.00 01/23/2009 ItiMMI ° add sltEtf4 31359MF24 5.000,000.00 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC 3YMcfiMo 508 01/27/2009 �+t( YW,i;SQa' i"l�i��'t���' 5000,000.00 9909 4,954]DOW [4530000) 5.25" 2A4 2.64 10000000 OD 98.91 5.000,00000 9903 99.03 GAIN/LOSS 9,890,60D DO YLD AT 4.95155000 [4845000) 510 235 247 l i 0,:- .WY'" "Ttia- 8,ra -YBFTl 4.95155000 (4855000) 5.10 235 247 ii��tkftt.FT1"�ADf- 9.88130000 (118]0000)' 5.10 238 2,50 :1 /07MC _ 10" 12/19/2008 5.10 18192006 5.000.000.00 5.10 12)29/2008 10,000.00000 98.8 r +alhr'S' �?`^_i?�YO,bBO, (.,DO;'-. 0)8 .=¢996b368[R70:77, .9n ED . VII `l.. 5.000,000.00 98.84 4.042,200,00 5],800.00) 5.00 2.39 25] 313617sn6. 5.000.000.00 FED NAT M 3-Pt3m0 02/17/2009 31359MJ]9 S136FiO4 3136F IXS1 500000000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOCMNDOM0 Afl� , fi d -6- x 3136F7223 500000000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC3VrNc3Alo ' 3136F]ZK6 10,000,MO 00 FED NAT IAORTG AS_5.O_C_.3Y_ trirstl .............. ... . ............._ 3136F7039 10,00003000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC3Y ilia uiwo ft 313897E97 5.000,000.00 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC 3Y 413�fiJ 0 ORTG ASSOC. 000,000,00 FED NAT 488,482,000.00 FNMO -FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 310i89G 313580F6 313 _ 18*100 919589N66 25,000,000.00 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTEB FRMC• FEDEML HOME LOAN MORG CORP 01 _ ikl ii N:MORG 313397M65 25,000,000.00 FEMEML HOME LOAN MCQG CORP DI 50,000,000.00 lA0 � LOCAL AGENCY ODIIGAT10N3 ORTG ASSOC.3Y 6Mo1X 130 Yr1X A DISCOUNT NOTES FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES _....4000, iRNtOWD a ate: 7tIC1TCOURT SE 000,000.00 U6 DISTRICT COURTHOUSE 1835.0000D MF- MONEY MARKET FUND 10,000.0DD. MTNO-MED TERM NOTES 36.062GXROT -- 10.00000000 38982GZZO 40,000,0D000 MUW -MUNICIPAL BONDS 98]338BC8 45656]VFO 9814]ZHO 080,400.00 000,000.00 560,000.00 Vid*tAl ��.r,, GE CAPITAL CORP All t/F1L1% GE GAP CORP 430IAAAIg4A • VOSEMITECACMNT COLLEGE AANA NDUSTRY CA URBANOEVAGYA08)4AA SAN LOSE REVE RF B AAN: 30911E55 2000,00090 CSCDA AAA 33,035,WD.00 DLL NEGOTIABLE CD 9026201188 0,000,00000 06060VJ24 50.000ON 00 700091191A 7 P111.7 O6]3P18L] 98151KYS9 50.000,000.00 000.DDO.DO 8336POWVJ8 SO,OoDODDOJ 780I0FFD6 60,o00,0DD,o0 • 6e9,000,000.00 TCD - TIME DEPOSITS 10,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 Totals. 4,114462,000.00 OBS AG STAMFORD Ale/PI/F1 e .. EE. BANK OF AMERICA Al4/P1/914 ROYAL OF CANADA AI IPi/F1 BARCLAY'S CAPITAL At+/Pt WORLD SAVINGS SOCIESOCIETE GENERNE A ft05 GREENYACH A14IPiF14 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK I.Tne PoPermW and 2eN918E0ta'm money outset asae6w veMW on P^d,®ed PIEK, 2. Auuge LFee Nenuibadyv¢1MI1 phYlgllo roamed 4 miuiy. weoled 6y market re4e 3. L or31 Agency O� have m®LA Ne m,Fp¢. epaed b Pool. 4 M�4 pmtim_TFe WmtlaDo die6=-noe dassnny b a*on dung! mO Nyiv m. mmned ma.uon d e seal*..1M luet,c me!AA 4.12 08101 5.25 530 03Y20/ 5 / 5.70 05/IM m4 - 5.45 052M 4,99],2500D 98.84 4,99220D,OD ,j55 D5000) 5.10 2J9 2.58 Sis _:"06/092009 - 10,000,00000 5000,00000 9931 4,96565D 00 (3435000I 530 253: 2.12 L 499681800- 9941 4,970300pD (265/500) 552 261 281 re� hlt4`6d"; i6 0.01» 570 2 1,...w_281`. 5,000,000 00 9950 4,9)S OOD 00 (25,000 90) 5]0 260 288 99.66 TrZ44,60000 00�00) 5,45 0000,00000 9966 09656000o j3440000) 545 279 289 99,6.IeT'"u7i':i. .", .;__.,F00 5..7i= '-TNL`�` 293 9966 996560000 (344DD001 5.15 2]J 2.93 A4,98595000 (14 DSD 00) 883 488,434,079.31 485,060,34000 (3,373,739_ 4.07 091112006 24,475,798.81 495 0912]I2006 24.4]0,625.00 0.77 , VRIT''''''' ' '',VI:r 1 97.90 24,4]5]9861 4.97 021 ' 020 07.88 24.470 625 00 5.06 0,24 0.24 490 11/08/2000 24,305,833.33 98.14 24,535,00000 229,166.67 5.04 0.36 0.36 171260451.38 1]1,]68,826.38 504,376.00 4.99 023 - 0.23 AatientONADOOKMUMOOKOrMigraiDW 9826 24,565,00000 291000.00 498 034 034 49,150,000.00 581,833.33 498 0.13 0.33 00 5.00 02/152007 4,25 01115/2008 081012006 y -Y 0510112087 98527000�9803 �980,330.00 081012007 1560,2/960 9853 1$37,00160 00] 2,D0] kti64 1,735,00909 1,735,09990 30,000,000.00 9994.600.00 99.65 9,5849000D 4.951.800.00 96.06 9,901,610.00 5.11 14 ].13 9.]0 0.00 0.00 OU 5.06 0.61 0.6 V 850.00 (4].950011 4.77 use ���am. 39,698,860.0o ,064,052.20 080,075 R02,750801 4.99 0.]6 0.62 0.09 (6,940,00) 3.86 0.83 0.63 23,16600) 4.06 1.06 1.09 8660 OD 4tt 1 06 32,840,148.60 (223,903.60 5.00 071102006 50,000,67819 10000 50000,67819 5,02 07I912008 50.000.000.0D 00.00 R50.000.000.00 S.CS 08/162006 50.001.199.09 100.00 90,001, 109.09 5.18 081312006 50,000,000.00 100.00 50,000,000.00 53_8 09)012006 38,000,00000 1W.00 30009,OOp.00 5 50001,32>8t 10000 50,001350.00 44 10/0 2 006 5.21 111082006 50.00000000 100.00 50,00800000 988,007,241.56 497 10/0612006 698,007?21-26 10,000,000.00 20,000,00000 4,104,307,00681 100.00 10000.000.00 20,000,000.00 109 0.49. 0.49 500 009 00S 5.02 0.08 0.08 I 5.05 0.12 0.19 5.10 O.16 0.17 5J8 O.10 0.17 026 543 OTO OT6 �.' 521 034 036 2➢.30 5.16 0.15 0.16 4.97 0.25 0.27 0.24 4.93 023 4,004,159,62895 (20,147,379.54 4.60 0.76 0.79 21P- Oars c Summary of Authorized Investments The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund was in FULL COMPLIANCE with the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy. The County's Investment Policy is more restrictive than the California Government Code. This policy is reviewed annually by the County's Investment Oversight Committee and approved by the County Board of Supervisors. California Government Code Investment Category LOCALAGENCY BONDS I, L, C. CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY DEBT FEFIERAL=A6EN& ,1:94B —YO..-FLIP rffia tlt1.Pl BILLS OF EXCHANGE alMMERCtA,L' gAFEW _ ="- CERTIFICATE & TIME DEPOSITS REVERSE REPOS T£Rh#`.P7i;ES Cal -TRUST SHORT TER M FUND SECURED BANK DEPOSITS LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS Maximum Maturity Authenied % Limit 5 YEARS NO LIMIT Qael Ry SO/ Maximum Matur- Moody's Ity Count Investment Polee Authorized 9r' Limit 3YEARS :15%/$150MM 5 YEARS . NO LIMIT ? 3 YEARS 1� 270 DAYS ` 40%In 5 YEARS 30% IIhALS I I'� 92 DAYS : 20% ljt _ N/A § N/A 1 ass 'Quarty S&P/ Moody's A/A2/A EActual Riverside Porfow rs 0.80% 2.5% " INVESTMENT GRADE ° 0.04% i 180 DAYS . 30% ( 1YEAR 25% MAX Al/P1/F1 Al/P1/F1 17.34% j 60 DAYS ; 10% MAX = N/A 0.00% t DAILY LIQUIDITY 1% Board Approved N/A '. NO LIMIT - 3 YEARS ` 0% MAX _"rNYAr9i'i - lS No more than 30% or thls category may be Invested w/th any one commercial bank Mutual Funds maturity may be interpreted as weighted average maturity not exceeding 90 days 3 Or must have an investment advisor with not less than 5 years experience and with assets under management or $500,000,000. Projected Cash Flow The Pooled Investment Fund cash flow requirements are based upon a 12 month historical cash flow model. Based upon projected cash receipts and matu- rating investments, there are sufficient Funds to meet future cash flow disbursements over the next 12 months. Month . Monthly Receipts Monthly Disbmts Difference Required Mat. Invest Balance Actual Inv. Maturities Avail. To Invest> 1Yr. 06/2006 08/2006 688.1 699.5 (11.4) 10/2006 612.2 735.6 �(123.4) 12/2006 1,375.9 693.8 682.1 02/2007 618.0 806.3 (188.3) 04/2007 1,505.7 738.5 767.2 06/2007 755.6 885.2 (129.6) 34.4 530.7 295.0 105.2 82.4 117.0 126.0 51_0 Totals 9,720.9 9,749.5 (28.6) 120.2 2,824.4 3,983.8 2.93% 68.82% 97.07% THIS COMPLETES THE REPORT REQUIREMEN FE O k ALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 53646 Page 3 County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 4th Floor - Capital Markets Riverside, CA 92502-2205 www.countytreasurer.org , (951) 955-3967 23 AGENDA ITEM 6E RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: August 28, 2006 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Transportation Uniform Community Infrastructure Mitigation Fee Financing through Statewide: Program STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file statu report on Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Financing through Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (SCIP); and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the Commission's June 2005 ret fee financing, as several develope financing of Western County TUMF consisted of the issuance of debt debt proceeds to the Commissi Governments (WRCOG); and the a debt proceeds by the Commission eat, staff made a presentation regarding TUMF s have expressed an interest in tax-exempt fees. The proposed TUMF fee financing plan y Riverside County (County); the transfer of n and the Western Riverside Council of ministration, management, and expenditure of nd WRCOG. As a result of various issues and concerns discussed during the presentation, there was a lack of support for this TUMF fee financing proposal. T working group meeting of Com developers and consultants in June At subsequent meetings of the wo 2005, County staff and its consul County would apply for participa Development Authority's (CSCDA) e Commission's response was reported at a ission staff, WRCOG staff, County staff, 005. king group in November 2005 and December ants presented a new proposal whereby the ion in the California Statewide Communities SCIP for development impact fee financing in unincorporated County areas ut lizing 1913/1915 Act special assessment obligations. TUMF fees would be under a reimbursement program or survey of 21 developers interested that SCIP revenues available to t inanced through SCIP, the issuer of the debt, refunding program. Based on a building permit n participating in the SCIP program, it appears e Commission for Western County regional 24 arterial expenditures could approximate $56 million over a three year period. In February '2006, the County submitted a formal request for the Commission's participation in the SCIP program. At the March 8,2006 Commission meeting, the Commission approved in -concept the Commission's participation in the SCIP program. In June 2006, WRCOG approved in -concept its participation in the SCIP program. Since the Commission neither collects nor administers the TUMF program, it is no longer required to be a party to any agreements. Participation in the SCIP program will be required of the County by adoption of a resolution, and WRCOG will enter into a fee collection and disbursement agreement with the CSCDA and the County. The issuance: and administration of debt would be the responsibility of SCIP. As eligible infrastructure expenditures are incurred, the Commission would submit to SCIP a requisition for disbursement. The Commission would have no administrative responsibilities other than submitting such requisitions to : pay expenditures. Accordingly, no additional costs for the Commission are associated with the SCIP. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2006/07 Amount: Undetermined Source of Funds: TUMF Fees (Financing) Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: 210-72-42110 TUMF Revenue -Regional Arterials 210-73-42110 TUMF Revenue-CETAP Fiscal Procedures Approved: 'j' Date: 8/28/06 25 " A G E N " A I T E M 6 F " " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : A u g u s t 2 8 , 2 0 0 6 T O : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e F R O M : S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g a m M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : O b l i g a t i o n A u t h o r i t y G o v e r n m e n t s ( S A N B A G ) L o a n t o S a n B e r n a r d i n o A s s o c i a t e d S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : 1 ) R e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e O b l i a t i o n A u t h o r i t y L o a n R e p o r t ; a n d 2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : O b l i g a t i o n a l A u t h o r i t y ( O A ) i s a f e d e a l t e r m t h a t r e f e r s t o t h e p e r c e n t a g e o f a n n u a l ' a p p o r t i o n m e n t t h a t i s g i v e n t o a s t a t - . T y p i c a l l y , C a l i f o r n i a r e c e i v e s a n a v e r a g e o f 9 0 % o f i t s a n n u a l a p p o r t i o n m e n t . T e d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n a p p o r t i o n m e n t a n d O A , i s t h a t O A i s t h e a m o u n t o f f u n s t h a t a r e a l l o w e d t o b e s p e n t , a n d t h e a p p o r t i o n m e n t i s t h e c e i l i n g o f f u n d n g t h a t t h e f e d e r a l g o v e r n m e n t a u t h o r i z e s i n t h e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n B i l l . I f s t a t e s d o n o t s p e n d 1 0 0 % o f t h e r O A i n a g i v e n y e a r , t h e f e d e r a l g o v e r n m e n t w i l l g i v e t h e u n a u t h o r i z e d O A t o o t h r s t a t e s t h a t c a n d e m o n s t r a t e t h e y c a n s p e n d i t . T h i s i s c a l l e d t h e A u g u s t R e d i s t r i b u t i o n . C a l i f o r n i a n o r m a l l y r e c e i v e s a d d i t i o n a l f e d e r a l f u n d i n g t h r o u g h t h e A u g u s t R - d i s t r i b u t i o n . E a c h y e a r , C a l t r a n s p r o v i d e s c o u n t y O A t a r g e t s t o e n s u r e e a c h c o u n t y r e c e i v e s i t s f a i r s h a r e o f O A , w h i c h i s b a s e d o n p o p u l a t i o n . C o u n t i e s m a y o r m a y n o t s p e n d 1 0 0 % o f t h e i r O A g i v e n t h e i r r e s p = c t i v e p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y s c h e d u l e s f o r t h e y e a r . T h e r e f o r e , i f a c o u n t y s p e n d s 7 5 % " f i t s O A t a r g e t , C a l t r a n s w i l l " c r e d i t " t h e n e x t y e a r ' s O A t a r g e t b y t h e a m o u n t o u n s p e n t f u n d i n g a n d v i c e - v e r s a i f a c o u n t y o v e r s p e n d s i t s O A . T h i s y e a r , h a s b e e n a d i f f i c u l t y e a r f o r c o u n t i e s t o s p e n d a l l o f t h e i r O A d u e t o p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y d e l a y s a n d l o w d e l i e r y p l a n n e d f o r f e d e r a l f i s c a l y e a r 2 0 0 5 / 0 6 . R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ' s d e l i v e r y r a t e w a l o w t h i s y e a r d u e t o a c c r u a l o f f e d e r a l f u n d s f o r l a r g e p r o j e c t s s u c h a s t h e 9 1 H i e h O c c u p a n c y V e h i c l e ( N O V ) l a n e p r o j e c t . I n 2 6 addition, local agency projects have been delayedfor variousreasons including environmental issues, new Disadvantage Business Enterprise requirements, and the Environmental Protection Agency's new requirement for projects to address Particulate Matter 2.5. Caltrans Headquarters has indicated that given the low delivery rate throughout the state, that there is a possibility that 100% of the OA may not be spent resulting in a loss of spending that can't be recaptured. Riverside County's OA target balance is approximately $32 million. The estimated amount of OA that will be spent by the end of the federal fiscal year (September 30, 2006) is approximately $12-14 million. In order to protect the OA, the Commission negotiated with the San Bernardino Associated Governments to "loan" it the ,balance of OA, which is approximately $16 million. SANBAG has utilized 100% of its OA for the year and could use additional OA to cover cost increases on its Interstate 215 widening project. This loan will allow SANBAG to proceed with its project with an agreement to payback the OA in FY 2009/10. The OA payback will provide for additional OA needed to fund construction of the 91 HOV lane project through downtown Riverside. It should be noted that this OA loan is not real money included in the Commission's budget. It can be viewed in terms of allowing SANBAG to spend more than its county OA target on a large scale project this fiscal year. In turn, the Commission will be allowed to spend more than its county target on a large scale project, which will be needed for construction of the 91 HOV lane project in FY 2009/10. Attachment: Joint Letter to Terry Abbott, Caltrans Headquarters 27 IG+�erslenty Trenspnrtsrtion Co 408.0'Lesieet, d t7rrar R i verside;-C A:'9 2501 (951) 787- 2141 Au got t,-29Q6 Mr. Terry Abbott, Chief , Division of Local Assistance = Department of Transportation 1120 isl Street, MS1 - Sacrament©., CA 95814 S#3BJECT: Fiscal Year 2{75 the Riverside Co nth San 8erriardints-_ ssa ThiStetter is to formalize an;agree rti 4f ©btigatmal Authority (©A)'frxrrr wilt -riot obiigete-its entire ©A tare baienc cif apprOximately $14 Mili'11 federal iscOyear'. We expect to krie Local Assistenceprovides as.:the • tttt occurred during the fourth :quark SANBAGTs in need ttif acl'ditrori t o (FlOV) prdj €:t Therefore, f TC age to the: oe,rti gt jr l to ilfilt t#�eir ritieal`prQtect that will benafrt rif iigation`of $2I o Sb: IVtAQ.# segment 2 of the-therst #e 21 S 1 tQ arno_ndthe-ht as tie fends are p igre SANBAG agrees to pay+Back the flA State Route.9t t3V,prit. Prese 2tit3SI09Ek,9t371 Ad}trnents` -eport tirr"s rat it r+ .Bran+ �AI`y BAOS QA targets er - trta 4.94Y11-x715 _ 'Authority,.t Agreement betwai n - #ati n CorniniSetbn (R. PTC-). and'#he: t.. �rerr iants:( AP,BA6 . fear i C Cvt11 hu_ �t nc�t.be obiigeted babe end',of1t 1 A batance as on es n balances inclUding-deob at4on of tur lar IF# ii ray Ad iriie F th €ctpitidy V f3A�t�alane��to SA a€iuests, i�up�rtc an,+illt+e'uaedtctwa fie ;right-iif ;att1 ahaa et n cxah t#ixr€ ion aV;Zi3CkCCIr in'; .°We epprecta a this opPort $I $0§; «h v 4myqtiekons p aa&con¢c ShMay :< &ick:qANtAG at (-gob)€184*276. : Q$p $ 7=7141 £Andrea AGENDA ITEM 6G • " R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T N S P O R T A T / O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : A u g u s t 1 8 , 2 0 0 6 T O : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e F R O M : S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o r a m M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f P r o g r a m - Q u a r t e r l y r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e ( T U M F ) R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l R e p o r t S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : 1 ) R e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e T U F R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l P r o g r a m Q u a r t e r l y R e p o r t ; a n d 2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : A t t h e r e q u e s t o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n , . t a f f i s p r o v i d i n g q u a r t e r l y p r o g r e s s r e p o r t s o n t h e T U M F R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l P r o g r a . T h e C o m m i s s i o n p r o g r a m m e d a t o t a l o f $ 4 8 . 5 8 8 m i l l i o n o f T U M F f u n d s t o 2 p r o j e c t s i n W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . T h e J u n e 2 0 0 6 q u a r t e r l y p r o g r e s r e p o r t i n d i c a t e d 1 3 a g r e e m e n t s h a d b e e n e x e c u t e d . T o d a t e , t h e r e a r e a t o t a l o f 1 6 a g r e e m e n t s e x e c u t e d , 4 i n p r o g r e s s , a n d t h e r e m a i n i n g 4 p r o j e c t a g r e e m e n t s a r e e x p e c t e d t o b e c o m p l e t e b y t h e e n d o f F Y 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 . T o t a l T U M F R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l F u n d s p r o g r a m m e d a n d u n d e r a g r e e m e n t i n c l u d e : F Y 2 0 0 5 / F Y 2 0 0 6 / F Y 2 0 0 7 / F Y 2 0 0 8 / F Y 2 0 0 9 / T o t a l 6 $ 7 . 9 7 8 M 7 $ 2 6 . 8 7 7 M 8 $ 3 . 8 2 1 M 9 $ 2 . 0 0 0 M 0 $ 0 . 0 0 0 M $ 4 0 . 6 7 6 M R e m a i n i n g b a l a n c e o f p r o g r a m m e d f n d s a w a i t i n g a g r e e m e n t s i s $ 7 . 9 1 2 m i l l i o n . S t a f f i s w o r k i n g w i t h t h e W e s t e r n ' i v e r s i d e C o u n c i l o f G o v e r n m e n t s t o r e v i e w t h e 2 0 0 5 T U M F N e x u s s t u d y a n d t h e a s s o c i a t e d c h a n g e s t o p r o j e c t c o s t a n d s c o p e 3 0 adjustments. This review will require amendments to existing agreements to reflect the updated Nexus study. Attachment: TUMF Regional Arterial Funds Programmed - September 2006 31 g lol 06ed MIME] 000'0$ r y.�1 s $ ") I'' i 4.`. 4480 $ 5140 $ - $ — - -- I ,i. i a A su00 MTh — ?'8Sd IS UOSJPOr of IS Janis OuV DODS 6uluaplM uaing uoA . 9000/01/4 Sh80 $ c to $ _.:�� .Q, $ 03NelS $-� .. 03'8Vd s 000'0$ - $ - $ r ., on 1 $ ss - $ -® Hi roof, plawoo of maJpuV Eulueplm uaJn9 uDA GPlslanla . SOOZ/6/II £U01_. $_. PAM 03N'0I$ - $ 03'8Vd . s 000-0$ - $ - $ - _ $ 6040 $ PI 4 iooA _ $ I.jni $ �� Gull 9 ,b M/a -009S01 0161AGyoe6 AalloA o0OZ/8/ZI - $ 37$71--- {3 r000aH /o60 a4Oa$ OUGJDIN 601 0 $ 604'0 $ 039Vd MIME' ZP£ I$ - $ 19E1 A P£10 $ - $ IololJOaA _anuanV - dbC 1 $_ '. 11 9Z0 ! $ s ,.. � - MOM pluozuoW 6uluaplM PJonalnog AalloA oualoys POOL/8/6 _ 9E£ 0 $ 9££'0 $ _ 3'8Sd 01 anuanV w Sad 90, 1diS 0310361X3 b£1'0 $ -- 17£1'0 $ 037Vd Poomuwl nrinliMiOIL'L$ S561 $ 1 I; LI $ 68£0 S - $ Io1.01JO4A - 01!'L $ *-IMEMIll anuanV snpDO 6UIuaPIM AalloA - I $ �a 1-111.11012.1 oy ADmssaldx3 plonalnog ouaJop.1 1•00Z/8/6 1/80 _ $ la 0 _ $_ _ _ _ _ 38Sd _ DuowDa Slud a 90, 1d3$ 03103dX3 68£'0 $ 6g£'0 $ 03'8Vd 0000$ OOZC $ 00£9 $. - $ - $ ppiJOG A awanoJ•wI CO- "L $ `- ti " ". 11111111111111111 su°0 PDDL' a6uD4DJam .. _ w ...,-:;_ 000'9 $_ i. Zip >+s 111=11.=EZEM 61111H uoAuop 91-1 /Pooh aJoulsl3 a)i01 POOL/8/6 _ _ 00£'0 $ -- 00£0 $ �0111051111 of S l 91016Jalul uoAuco .72ii , I ( - $ SY)q-I $ - $ IJZI'0 $ IDIDI JDaA 11111.281171MMEENDil�� S05'I $ 3 f i„2- ... _ woo punog4VoN anoymayul - 0LI'0 $ a .cw iti'J �lP OZI'0 $ M/a 3Hayl04 pooa uoAuo: •lo •a; 9I-1 /P6 o wa Duoloo _ POOZ/8/6 90100 03103dX3 - $ - 383d 03'8Vd ®48Gl I$ Z8o'LI $ 000Z $ ___ OOOZ $ $ III j ,�{ pp@ $ H'8¢0Lru4+e 000b $ - $ IDyoimaA - anuanV ulo0uNo1 apuol�j oasod u0151.1ayx3 AJaIsaM ADMhJDd ouon0 POOZ/8/6 000'L S M/ a 000Z S 395d 03N`JIS _.._.._ $.. ....._...._.. .. _._.., - $ - 3 ' $ - $ 039Vd IDyoi L - II141006 0000$ oPZ'P $ LPZ'P S suo3 16 a5 10a101d - Bu!Puad luawpuawy - $ � � ILL, � , ''i � _ _ M/a 3$Sd of Pooe 4ouoa zanEu!w00 Pooa Janla uaaJ� ouoJoO POOL/8/6 03N91S - $ 031Vd - AouaBy 0101 q Snlyl$ 1N3W3320V 10101 asoyd 600Z Ai 800Z Ai LOOZ Ai 900Z Ai 500Z Ai asoyd 60w11 yna1041 atlll paf041 pca3 pawww6ad °pa paw= • o - 1150 1nq pal en -el uaaq anoy ale ul slunowy :a1oN (suoltlw of s,$ ) pewwmBosd Bulpund puo alnpayos porn d sllola0 paleJd Iopa4V :sasoyd pafoJd smpepy - oloa pawwoJ6om spuni slopayy louo(6aa iWnt pawwoi6om spuntl main/ puol6aa ovnl uoIsslwwoo uopopodsuo4 Apinop aplsianla Arterial ProJecl DetailsProject Schedule and Funding Programmed Note: Amounts In Gre have been re-ue ( $'s In mlllons) ted but •ot •ro• awned Date Programmed b RCTC 0 0 0 Phase .. FY 2005 FY 2006 fY 2007 FY 2008 - FY 2009 Phase Total AGREEMENT STATUS Van Buren Van Buren Blvd 1.410111111111111111.110 ® $ _ _SIGNED _------PS& ___ _ ._ ___.. ________ ____ Blvd - 91 at the 91 9/8/2034 Riverside R/W $ 2000 r r. P-5-FN 471 444.4 r, $ 2000 FreewaY Freeway MEM.11-® ', ®.® $ 6.000 nterchange Interchnage fear Total $ - $ 2.000 $ - $ 8.000 $0.000 $ - - 10.000 - -efersi•e :un•y :un•Y anyan M-41MMEMEMEM®--� $ 0.112 SIGNED ' County Canyon- Road from I-15 M ®- $ 9/8/2004 Transportati Road/Scott Murdeta Road, R/W "` ' ,• $_ _ _ _ _ on Road Scott Road from Cons r $ - De•artmentIm•roveme Murreta Read 'feat lotnl $ 14/I2 $ - $ - $ - $0.020EMMEME1 -wem a State Route "1•en a e �S-®®®$ SIGNED ME $ 1.000 $ 1000_ County 79 Route 79 to four 2111 /2004' Transportati (4) lanes from R/W _ on Improveme_ Thompson Road Cons - - -"es, _ $ _-- 13.000 ee•artment nt Project south limit to Year Tol al $ 7.000 $ - $ 11.000 $ - $40;0 $ 14.000 'werst e. an :uren •n •an=uren -®e --®--$ - EXPECTED SEPT'06 County. Bridge Blvd from Clay PS&E $ - ' 9/8/2004 Transportati Boulevard Street (north ____RS&E R/W IIc - on Widening Emit-approx. =EIMMI- 4.860 $ 4.860 De•artment and Bdd•e 1000feet north n30110101 $ - $ 4.960 $ - $ - $0.000 -Iversl•e •an :uren en •an :uren I -' 1 1.111301111.111111111111111.1--- $ O.:r26 SIGNED County Widening- Blvd between --®i -1111.111111.11 $ 0564 9/8/2004 Transportati Washington Washington-- $ on Street to Street and MM. 1 __:„. - De•artment Wood Road Wood Road In Year Total $ 0.226 $ - $ 0.564 $ - $'.000 -Nem e as ern PA&ED $ 1.000 $ 1.000 $ 1.000 $ 3.000 SIGNED County Bypass Eastern Bypass PS&E - $ 9/8/2004 Transportati on Project Devebpme from Auld Road to I-15 R/W ®MEMAMEMME11 : $ .. De ailment nt YearTotal $ 1.000 $ 1.002 _ $ - 1.000 $ - $041rX1 $ 3.000 $ - Ivere•e •o rero -a rem •, Ill11ZDEM1--I-I-IS County Boulevard from San $ 2.000 .11111111.1111.111111.1, - $ 2 C00 9/8/2004 Transportati on.. Project Developme Timoteo -. Canyon Road/ �� ® De••rtment nt - - •ak Valle Year total $ - $ 2000 $ - $ - $. . 00 $- 2.000 •lversl•e ew yew aong - PA&ED .. S - 0.750 - $ 0.750 SIGNED County Interchange 15 between the PS&E - $ 2000 _ '. $_ _ 2000 9/8/2004 Transportati on1-15at existing c< R/W ",E"r` � � �av 1mT,. g on Schleismon . Li Limonite Ave IC -� ,=r I _ --_ � r i®.T $ 20000 De••rtment Road and Sixth St IC In Tolol Year $ - $ 0.750 $ - $ 2.000 $'4.2'i0 $ 27.000. •ver••e Clin}d Keith PARED County d R/1-15IC Clinton Keith/I- PSBE- _ '-- .- ---'- $ - Transportati R/W �,�W_ " $ on - Improvem 15 Interchange ���e - ---- - De.. rtment nt Project Ye $ - $ _ $13.500® - Page 2 of 3 • E {o E aBed inErdi COCA OS6£l $ L£S41 $ IbS LI $ 0007; $ IZB'E $ 09Z'bE $ ILO 'Z $ 036'£I $ L 14'OI _ $ OL f9 $ £ZL'£ $ $ 10401100A OZ suo0 M/8 1111111111111111131111 0007 $ IZ8'E $ LL81917, $ IIL6'L $ 1o101 JDaA NOININN®' 000'4 $ 8L9Z----I- AA/8 T55,1 _ 038Vd 90/91/8 90d 03WWV80084 SON ni 1tl1,101038 AWOL 1V101 1N3W33210tl MONO ONIONni 1tl101 •®000'04 0065 _ $ 000 V $ 0100 _. $- 03N015 - __. $_ - $ 006S $ 010'0 $ ii "'-`,; ,' 000'1, $ —MEE= 14401100A 41noS 6L8S Pup g L uapava{ul I ay' o s w3 £4'Z duo l (6LJS) P8.0001401 M aBuoyoaa{ul elouO4111' LoosDlnoewei 6LSS/SI-I DI puo ASSOJOl9n0 S1-1 /AMA,/ - .. olnoawal 400Z/8/6 4COZ/8/6 - $ 5 _ ^- 000'4 S MIMI 010'0 - $ L IS'L $ - $ —1=1;1Z= 39Sd _-I{o 034Vd IZ{0110a,A 13311000'0$1 0000, $ -.nnn r y. a' s s*•. ��fR4�M to, INECOMMEni—® ECI7� V 03N015 V_.___ _ ....$ ....._....___.._.. __..._...__ _.._.___.._____._ . ________ xaddo' -ua-- 00L'0 $ - $ _ $ 03N%IS COCO - $ 000'0$ - $ - $ OOL'0 $ - $ —Mali Ioloi lOaA PaypOu 0 ul afiuoyaa4ul yln05 6L 8S /$PI wo.g 'Aa owlxolddv Pn{S 4JawuBllV Jopwo0 ssodAg wa sa olnoawal 4COZ/5/6 ____ _.... __. _ OOL 0 S _ _ ___.._.— —MiniaThil M/8 38Sd JJ. OOSb $ 0000 $ _._. 00£'0 _ $ 03N01S 0000 $ 0000$ - $ 1 0( $ 005'0 $ N. -- 006'0 $ ._._. 001:'0 $ _.._. 006'0 S 00Z'0 S 1440i 1a0A woo paloJo•Jooulun anuany Jopap o{ OlUhDf UD$ UI 00J u0n0 BJn 013 doe) AomsseJdx3 DUOWDa 0 001sue x oN1DOf U0S 400Z/8/6 f ... w,...... M/S .............. ....._... 39Sd -- _ 1 (00E $ 09I-0 $ 03N015 Ob0"0 - $ 000"0$ - $ mem $ 091'£ $ 060'0 $ —M212EM 10101/00A s{iwg AllD Alta{sam of (6L A mH) anuany uovapuo$ IPOPd dWn1) Bwua Ao0.0u x8 Duowo. o u oo uo 000'S S 09 C'0 $ —� 040'0 S 00, 0 $ 005'0 S � I1,1011a0A SUOD _ M/8 _....._. 3'85d _ 03'8Vd � 000'01 - $ D_ 'UAL s 0SL'0 $ 01 0 $ 0002 S g 03N016 Ono $ SI l/ssodAg walsD3wa{So3 S I-1 /ssodAg ay{ to 01 maN u= IJo•-f uo 6D4JOdsumi A4A000 0 519ni. 4COZ/8/6 OSL O $ 05L'0 $ 501V151N3W33110V 10101 asoyd 600Z Ai 8004 Ad LOOZ Ai 900Z Ai 500Z Ai espy,/ 0 0 "0 Oi�U 9 pawwpJBoa alo0 pawwoJipn you {nq pa{ an •aJ uaaq wog aJ0 to gunpwtl :a{oN (SW111lw ul 5,S ) pawuJoJBmd Bulpuni puo alnpayos {pa(pJ,/ enoleO pa(pld lopayy 2 w 1- Q z w o Q • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY T' A NSPORTAT/ON COMM/SS/ON DATE: August 28, 2006 TO: Budget and Impleme tation Committee FROM: Marlin Feenstra, Casa& Bill Hughes, Bechtel Projects Program Manager Project Manager THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel, Proje Hideo Sugita, Deput, t Delivery Director Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Agree Agreement No. 03 Prepare Constructio Corona Metrolink Station ent No. 03-31-014-03, Amendment No. 3 to 31-014 with Chong Partners Architecture to Plans for a Parking Structure for the North Main STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-31-014-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement' No. 03-31-014 to prepa a plans, specifications and cost estimate (PS&E) for the additional amount of $141,225, including a 3 month calendar extension to contract time, and a total not to exceed amount of $1,451,228; 2) Authorize the Chairman pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commision for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Due to the unique location of the N both the 1-15 and SR91 freeways, d capacity. Staff previously submitte Transportation Improvement Progra structure at the North Main Corona part of the California Transportation Improvement Program. At its September 11, 2002 meeting Gordon H. Chong & Partners, now C preliminary plans for a 1,000 stall rth Main Corona Metrolink station, adjacent to mand for parking is currently exceeding station an application for $1 1 million in Interregional (ITIP) funds to construct a 1,000 space parking etrolink station. The project was approved as ommission's adopted 2002 State Transportation the Commission approved an agreement with ong Partners Architecture Inc. (CPA!), to prepare parking structure at the North Main Corona Metrolink Station for an amount of $316,798. 35 On September 3, 2003 the Commission approved Amendment 1 to the CPA'I contract for $77,390 to conduct additional planning for the eventual maximization of parking at the station using the entirety of the existing surface parking area. Following completion and receipt of the preliminary design portion of the North Main Corona•Parking Structure, funding was requested to extend the Agreement with CPAI` to include the preparation of the final design plans, specifications and cost estimate (PS&E) for this parking structure. Agreement 03-31-014 was extended by Amendment 2 in the amount- of $915,815 to cover the costs of the final design and PS&E. Amendment 2 was .approved by the Commission on January 11, 2006. The currently; approved conceptual plan will allow for three different parking structure configurations that can be selected to best meet future parking demand. Parking Structure A on the -east lot will net 809 new spaces after subtracting the lost surface parking. Parking Structure B will net 671 spaces but must be built after or in conjunction with Parking Structure A because it will use the internal structure constructed by Parking Structure A. Parking Structure C on the west lot will net 859 additional spaces. If all three parking structures are built they will result in a total of 2,734 spaces that could be made available for Metrolink and rideshare parking at this station. Staff is recommending that the Parking Structure C (west lot) be constructed first. This will net 859 new spaces and bring the total number of parking spaces to 1,443 spaces (1,098 structure + 345 east lot). This will allow the Commission to provide as many as 543 (1,443-900) park and ride spaces based on `2010 demand which will reduce to 143 (1,443-1,300) based on 2020 demand without the construction of additional parking structure capacity. We anticipate having the construction plans ready to bid by Fall 2006. The actual construction will take approximately 16 months. The estimated cost to construct the proposed facility is roughly, $20,000 /stall plus escalation which results in an early estimate of $24 million for the construction contract. Assuming staff would need 15% for contingencies and 10% for the construction management team, an additional $6 million would be needed to deliver the project, bringing the estimate .for construction to $30 million. In addition, since the construction of the parking structure will displace 239 spaces, staff has looked at locations for temporary parking with possible shuttle service during construction. Temporary satellite parking with shuttle services is proving to be impractical, therefore, staff will explore opportunities to better utilize the space at the West Corona Station (currently only at 30% of 540 spaces). 36 Need for Amendment 3 During final design and preparation of and CPAI revealed the need for a� considerations to support the intend: requested to provide a cost estimate additional considerations in the final P in a forecasted additional cost of $1 time is also requested by staff. A des Attachment 3 (Exhibit A of the Agre element of this Amendment are als Agreement). he PS&E, continued consultations with the City ditional design elements, security and other d purpose of the parking structure. CPAI was and resulting schedule impact to include these .&E. Negotiations of the CPAI proposal resulted 1,225. A 3 month extension to the contract ription of these additional services is detailed in ment). Individual cost considerations for each • detailed in Attachment 3 (Exhibit C of the Staff is recommending that the Com fission approve Agreement No. 03-31-014-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement 03-1-014, for a base amount of $141,225 and a new total not to exceed amount of $1,451,228 (excludes fees for city of Corona plan check and building permits). Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2006-07 Amount: $141,225 Source of Funds: State Transportation Program (ITIP): $141,225 mprovement Budget Ad ustment: No GLA No.: 221-33-81102 P3800 Final Design Fiscal Procedures Approved: \4�:xij _ Date: 8/28/06 Attachments: 1) Existing Site Plan 2) Schedule 3) Chong Partners Architecture P oposal, Additional Site Services, dated June 1, 2006, including Exhibit A, 'cope of Services and Exhibit C, Compensation and Time. 37 u�l d 24.1 a. n}xu}S 6u nMed n� QUGnv) U71/4 41,A 1 • - lead . 0u0p9242 n 021 00 9e:;•42t A0' 029911009093 190E23 lieiuu1n9109100d 4000n9 0P016%IW .,....... ....... 2199 90R441:e911e100 9I11PWaS010n024a06002'409N1d Oe010044 ... 'M1 11119110* _ . 1 - :EU - YLMI • . - - star&• LLn - $T/l• Mil . • 67a9 - - • - al,t Mt, - � tut.. ', - - Orval Iel 90N2RI1211 99090 &xNeW 1099Vd•199249191.011 R lY rodate art 099E6E1 e9990 30200911292241 19100121 0429 A OY 901ZZR 0n1 soave ant 0MP0 94F.W 19090d E1440011101.941 9§ 6C 906AL 901 9064941.9141 En .. 0u2O42 n.ro..1 220201101041 99._9_. WILE mJ. KELR M.I. 09090 - - 9220021 40010101424000E 941/ 901E 99.i 904ZZA n41 CEP I madam dadaddra da1P1aM0. - 901C211001 DEWS M1 sites MO 9wIME PE:4d*WM 0L0n�_ g. 9C� wan*P0M 90E99091 A9P4 09w09W 1wuryade0 A100wm0 OC POAbO .,I 90RUY Ml eAeP O' 90E29 p9b1d 1911MW 9199 -e CC 9021Z16 MM 9097.06 eel AM 90002421H0 EDI IM1PwM0 • @ 2C 9090K 001 99499.IC eel fAep0 .30E4290104d 9010.901OLOn j LC - IEEE Pi 90'YL2 Pd VaP0 &41"/V 1000a091M11 910n R OC 90m. eel Ion=113 COMP *IL 90011•4491 92 .... OINg�®� df49 ^, - - •- 6LrY� ' ... - - .. _ t 94h { - 9Z 004tl44 eel PPNMI eel eAePO 10910 09)90ud 20E0 96 a • 9WC tit 10091 90'Li101 PA eM+Z Me40 u0;d PM 0eS --g -9L . ... 9b90N1 enl 9929401 wry. eMroZ RPltumeen %Wald 93 90E40 dd 9049442I9eM IWOC e0040 u0W Wj K 90218901 DEEM enl MEE 001 2E90 1001401029 EEO mid 'EZ SOME en Wp 06 104ed a 90e40 u9Id _e ' Q . t2 902416901 9009E2 MW 2Mn`Z NOw9e342099941%90 - 19 02 Nowa1n11 MEE ME eAePO 2 4294109339d 9490 utsei 0t- 991299 w+W 9YOryIL�Aa�MW Met Pn1Pe..l. ni g et 904.991N1.DLi MW 0MP rodaQraaMc0 we s 10000 ENE. it .t EMI Pi 96999 um a m9209e11100I00213900 _JE. Si- M. COZZ/9 nut 9Mf,A MW OM.Y uge00 4021929 AMES 6 94 90RL8 Pi 90ILtIL M96 LIMP OZ 001909021 311d YSB 9H Yl EOM m1 VI If MW n9LZ g9we0g I.I036d MB CI 99V9/91241 009T2 0t9 Moo 2494009110e9 Od%99eewi Lt 91911/1 Pi 909112MW 0.4. OC 001109001d 39d %$0 ✓v 41 MEE mi •01ELL2,MYA LeA9P IIMI9Y91e3 PN9%»de*did of ... e wisps w11 90ILR MW Pies 9120023299 ad%COL e 90I11J9 MW 9011.1/MW MMl 9»nws FM 3P0W0A9 _15_{_ 9 EWEu0W [lows MI cteY _ u61w00NIV0Y9 n1.0 90/92/2 MI 9001.19 MW sytitL - u9y00 4440092I{ 9E 9 902•ZN 1E2. Math wW 20I MMA'S On ViN g v 90104h MW MOOIN dad 22e90 e14044e1024090d mat enw! C 6 EM 220991 2241190140210d Z .22191993 MEE e01 904R 90IR 9e42 ME29 090400 Anu1u910ad _,91 t •a. 1111111111MVYiNINOS" w INIMI dL'71111111111111EME1f11111111MZ`LEI 01 " X H I B I T A S c : p e o f S e r v i c e s 1 . S u r v e y a s p a r t o f t h e o v e . 1 1 r e p l a c e m e n t p a r k i n g s t r a t e g y , n e w h a n d i c a p a c c e s s i b l e p a r k i n g s p a c e s i l l h a v e t o b e p r o v i d e d o n t h e e a s t p a r k i n g l o t w h i l e p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e ` C ' i s u n d e r c o n s t r u c t i o n . I n a d d i t i o n t o c o n s t r u c t i n g t h e w o r k , a f i e l d s u r v e y w i l b e n e c e s s a r y t o e n s u r e t h a t a n A D A c o m p l i a n t p a t h t o t h e e x i s t i n g p l a t f o a n d e l e v a t o r t o w e r i s d e s i g n e d a n d m a i n t a i n e d . 2 . L i g h t i n g d e s i g n o f a l l e l e a t i o n s o f t h e p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e , s t r e e t l i g h t i n g a l o n g p e r i m e t e r r o a d s a n d 1 g h t i n g o f t h e l a n d s c a p e p l a n t i n g s , c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e c i t y o f C o r o n a N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S p e c i f i c P l a n 3 . E x p a n d e d E l e c t r i c a l S e r v i c - . p e r t h e c i t y o f C o r o n a ' s d e t e r m i n a t i o n , s t r u c t u r e ` C ' a n d f u t u r e s t c t u r e s ` A ' a n d ` 1 3 ' w i l l a l l b e c o n s i d e r e d a s o n e b u i l d i n g r e q u i r i n g a s i n g l e , p o i n t o f e n t r y f o r t h e e l e c t r i c a l s e r v i c e a n d r e - s i z i n g e l e c t r i c a l e q u i p m e n t o s u p p o r t f u t u r e f u l l b u i l d - o u t . 4 . S e c u r i t y S y s t e m D e s i g n : e v e l o p a n e n h a n c e d s e c u r i t y s y s t e m c o m p a t i b l e w i t h e x i s t i n g M e t r o l i n k s y s e r n a n d r o u t e d t o t h e D o w n t o w n S t a t i o n S e c u r i t y M O M . 5 . L a n d s c a p e d e s i g n a n d d o u m e n t h a d s c a p e p a v i n g a r e a s t o d e l i n e a t e i n t e r s e c t i o n s a n d p e d e s t r i a c r o s s i n g z o n e s . 6 . S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a E d i s o n n o w r e q u i r e s t h a t e l e c t r i c a l p o w e r f o r b o t h p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e s a s w e l l a , t h e e x i s t i n g M e t r o l i n k p l a t f o r m a n d s t a t i o n b e p r o v i d e d t h r u o n e , s i n g l e s : r v i c e c o n n e c t i o n . T h i s h a s r e s u l t e d i n t h e f o l l o w i n g a d d i t i o n a l s c o p e : f s e r v i c e s : a . S i t e v i s i t a n d r e v i e o f e x i s t i n g 1 2 k V S C E s e r v i c e . b . R e r o u t i n g o f e x i s t i n _ 1 2 k V S C E s e r v i c e t o a v o i d b o t h n e w p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e s . c . L o c a t i o n o f e x i s t i n _ M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n c o n n e c t i o n s , s e r v i c e , t r a n s f o r m e r s a n d e l c t r i c a l l o a d s . d . D e s i g n o f n e w p r i m . r y d i s t r i b u t i o n a r e a t o s u p p o r t e l e c t r i c a l n e e d s f o r e n t i r e s i t e . e . O v e r a l l s i t e c o o r d i n a t i o n w i t h S C E . f . A d d i t i o n a l c o o r d i n t i o n w i t h R C T C . 7 . V e h i c l e c o u n t s y s t e m t o i n o r m u s e r s o n t h e n u m b e r o f p a r k i n g s p a c e s a v a i l a b l e o n e a c h f l o o r v i a l e c t r i c a l s i g n a g e a t b o t h g a r a g e e n t r a n c e s . W h e n a p p r o p r i a t e , s i g n s w i l l i n d i a t e " L O T F U L L " t o p r e v e n t f u r t h e r v e h i c l e s f r o m e n t e r i n g . 4 0 8. An entrance gate control system which will provide users with various options for usage payment ; pay on foot, credit card, monthly card or card reader debit system. 9. Notification Board signage at each entrance to inform users of the time remaining until the next train leaves in either direction. 10. A two week extension to Contract Time, moving the Completion date to November 14, 2006. 41 Compe The costs for the a Amendm 1. Additional field survey by TMAD design time at $120.00 avg. per hou 2. Additional interior and exterior ligh enhanced security system, designed 90hrs.of CPAI design time at $120. $47,500.00. XHIBIT C salion and Time ditional services included in nt 3 are as follows: aylor & Gaines; $3,450.00 plus 20hrs.of CPAI for an approximate total cost of $5,850.00. ing design, expanded electrical services and an by OMB Electrical; $36,700 plus 0 avg. per hour for an approximate total cost of 3. Additional landscape and hardscape design by Melendrez Landscape Architects; $9,600.00 plus 10 hrs. of CPAI deli _n time at $120.00 avg. per hour for an approximate total cost of $10,800.0 4. Southern California Edison require and the existing Metrolink station b change required OMS Electrical to $7,700.00. This alteration also req the amount of 70 hrs. at $120.00 av $18,500.00. that electrical power to supply both parking lots furnished thru one, single tie-in point. This e-design underground services in the amount of ired CPAI to provide additional design services in . per hour for the approximate total cost of 5. The design of a Vehicle Count Syst m, Notification Signage and Gate Control System, designed by Walker Parkin: Consultants will be performed for $28,900.00 plus 140 hrs. of CPAI design time . $120.00 avg per hour for an approximate total cost of $45,700.00. 6. The addition of two weeks of Cont + ct Time translating to an additional architectural effort of approx 191 hrs. at $120.0 per hour or approximately $22,975.00. The total cost of Amendment # 3 is $1 Contract time. The revised completion 1,225.00 including a two week extension of ate will be November 14, 2006. 42 AGEN • A ITEM 8 4) RIVERSIDE COUNTY T' 4 NSPORTAT/ON COMMISSION DATE: August 28, 2006 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Min Saysay, Progra Manager THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel, Proje t Delivery Director SUBJECT: Award of Agreeme Cutler, Inc., and, Epic Way Acquisition Identification and Mitigation Sites; Co is to Paragon Partners, Ltd., Overland Pacific Land Solutions, Inc. for On -Call Right -of - and Relocation; Real Property Searches, Feasibility Studies for Replacement and .t Estimates; and, Utilities Relocation Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Award Agreement N Agreement No. 07-72 Agreement No. 07-72- On-Call Right -of -Way Searches, Identificatio Mitigation Sites; Cost (ROW Services); 2) Authorize the Chairma the Agreements on beh 3) Approve an amendmen $300,000; and Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On May 10, 2006, the Commis Requests for Proposals (RFPs) for s current Commission projects and fu is first of the seven RFPs. . 07-72-025-00 to Paragon Partners, Ltd., 026-00 to Overland Pacific Cutler, Inc., and i27-00 to Epic Land Solutions, Inc. to perform Acquisition and Relocation; Real Property and Feasibility Studies for Replacement and Estimates; and, Utilities Relocation Services , pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute .If of the Commission; to the FY 2006/07 budget in the amount of ion approved and directed staff to release ven On -Call Right -of -Way Services to support ure Measure A highway and rail projects. This 43 The Calendar of events was as follows: Calendar of Events Distribution of RFP Pre -Proposal Conference (not mandatory) Proposals were Delivered to RCTC prior to 2 PM Evaluation Committee Review of Proposals Short Listed Firms were 'Notified Interviews of Short Listed Firms Staff Recommendation to Commission Selection Process_ June 13, 2006 June 20, 2006 July 13, 2006 July 20, 2006 July 20, 2006 July 25, 2006 September 9, 2006 A selection panel was assembled, which consisted of representatives from ROTC, Caltrans and County of Riverside. Staff received five proposals. The selection panel reviewed .the proposals based on qualifications of the firms, staffing and project. organization, work plan, cost and price, and, completeness of response. After review, the panel determined that three firms submitted high quality proposals. The three firms were invited for interviews. After careful evaluation of the personnel of the proposed project teams, their knowledge of the services required by the Commission and demonstrated capacity to complete the proposed scope of work, the panel ranked the three interviewed firms as follows: Top Ranked Paragon Partners, Ltd. Second Overland Pacific Cutler, Inc. Third Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Due to the amount of potential right-of-way services required to deliver future Commission projects, such as, the SR-79 Realignment and the Mid County Parkway projects, staff recommends that agreements be executed with all three firms. Cost will be based on time and materials, and the term of each contractis three years with two one-year contract extension options, tobe exercised at the sole discretion of the Commission. Work will be awarded on a rotating basis; however, when environmental clearance is obtained for major Commission projects, such as the SR-79 Realignment and the Mid County Parkway projects, work may be divided into three equivalent parts and assigned to the consultants in accordance with their ranking with the top ranked company selecting first, second ranked company selecting second, and the third ranked company will work on the remaining part of the project. 44 These ROW Services were not inc amendment is recommended in the way services prior to obtaining env After Commission projects have be: significant increase in the budget r come back to the Commission for ap uded in the FY 2006/07 budget. A budget amount of $300,000 for anticipated right-of- ronmental clearance of Commission projects. n environmentally cleared, staff anticipates a dated to right-of-way services and staff will . royal. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2006/07 Amount: $300,000 TUMF $174,000 Source of Funds: CMAQ $37,500 Budget Adjustment: Yes Measure A $88,500 210-72-81403 P5123 $ 75,000 210-72-81403 P5123 $ 50,000 GLA No.: 210-73-81403 P5123 222-31-81403 P3015 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 221-33-81403 P3800 $ 50,000 222-31-81403 P3005 $ 25,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: �34.0 Date: 8/28/06 45 " A G E N A I T E M 9 " R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N D A T E : A u g u s t 2 8 , 2 0 0 6 T O : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e i t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e F R O M : C a t h y B e c h t e l , P r o j e c t D e l i v e r y D i r e c t o r T H R O U G H : H i d e o S u g i t a , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : C o o p e r a t i v e A g r e e m e n t f o r t h e F u n d i n g a n d D o c u m e n t f o r t h e C a j a l c o / I - 1 5 N o . 0 7 - 7 2 - 0 3 0 - 0 0 w i t h t h e C i t y o f C o r o n a P r e p a r a t i o n o f a P r o j e c t R e p o r t / E n v i r o n m e n t a l I n t e r c h a n g e S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e C o o p e r a t i v e A o f C o r o n a a n d t h e C o m a n d E n v i r o n m e n t a l D o c 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r , p u A g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f 3 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : T h e c i t y o f C o r o n a ( C i t y ) i s i n t e r e 1 5 / C a j a l c o R o a d I n t e r c h a n g e b e c a u s t h i s l o c a t i o n . T h e C i t y w a s s u c c e s s f P r i o r i t y P r o j e c t R o a d w a y f e d e r a l d e n e w i n t e r c h a n g e . T h e C i t y h a s a l s a n d t r a f f i c u n i f o r m m i t i g a t i o n f e i n t e r c h a n g e m u s t b e c o m p l e t e d i n a o f t h e M i d C o u n t y P a r k w a y p r o j e c t p r o p o s e d M i d C o u n t y P a r k w a y a s E n v i r o n m e n t D o c u m e n t f o r t h e e n t i c o n s t r u c t i o n p r o j e c t e d f o r 2 0 1 1 . T h e C i t y d e s i r e s t o c o n s t r u c t t h e i n t s c h e d u l e a n d h a s a p p r o a c h e d t h e h a v i n g t h e c o n s u l t a n t o n t h e M i d w o r k o n t h i s i n t e r c h a n g e o n a n i n t e r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n t t o m o v e P a r k w a y p r o j e c t , a s p e c i f i c P r o j e c t r e e m e n t N o . 0 7 - 7 2 - 0 3 0 - 0 0 b e t w e e n t h e c i t y s s i o n f o r t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f a P r o j e c t R e p o r t m e n t f o r t h e C a j a l c o / I - 1 5 I n t e r c h a n g e ; s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h i s t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . t e d i n e x p e d i t i n g t h e i m p r o v e m e n t o f t h e I - o f c u r r e n t a n d p r o j e c t e d c o n g e s t i o n l e v e l s a t . I i n s e c u r i n g $ 6 . 8 m i l l i o n i n S A F E T E A - L U H i g h o n s t r a t i o n f u n d s f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h i s p r o g r a m m e d l o c a l f u n d s , b o t h d e v e l o p e r f e e s s , f o r t h i s p r o j e c t . I m p r o v e m e n t o f t h i s a s h i o n t h a t w o u l d n o t p r e c l u d e t h e c o n n e c t i o n a t t h i s l o c a t i o n . T h e c u r r e n t s c h e d u l e f o r t h e u m e s c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e P r o j e c t R e p o r t a n d e 3 2 m i l e c o r r i d o r a t t h e e n d o f 2 0 0 8 , w i t h r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n t s o o n e r t h a n o u r p l a n n e d C o m m i s s i o n t o d e t e r m i n e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f o u n t y P a r k w a y , J a c o b s E n g i n e e r i n g , c o m p l e t e c c e l e r a t e d s c h e d u l e . I n o r d e r t o a l l o w t h e o r w a r d s e p a r a t e f r o m t h e e n t i r e M i d C o u n t y R e p o r t a n d E n v i r o n m e n t a l D o c u m e n t f o r t h e 4 6 interchange must be prepared. Given the significant work already conducted in this area for the Mid County Parkway (environmental studies, preliminary engineering) and the importance of coordinating a new local interchange with the proposed system -to -system interchange in this area, Commission staff supports the City's request to modify the Jacobs' contract to allow advancement of the project as long as it does not slow down the balance of the Commission's project or jeopardize the project developmentwork on the Mid County Parkway. Staff has had multiple meetings with Caltrans staff and the Federal Highway Administration to obtain their concurrence on advancing this project, and they are supportive as long as a new Project Study Report and Value Analysis Study are completed. The City has agreed to bear the entire cost of completing the additional work. Terms of our agreement are outlined in the attached draft cooperative agreement. The details on the exact scope of services are still being refined through discussions with the City, Jacobs, Caltrans and the Commission. Once the requirements of the project are clarified and a specific cost for the new documents are determined, an amendment to the Jacobs contract will . be brought to the Commission for approval. Attachment: Draft Cooperative Agreement No. 07-72-030-00 47 " " C O O P E R A T I V E G R E E M E N T # 0 7 - 7 2 - 0 3 0 - 0 0 F O R T H E F U N I N G A N D P R E P A R A T I O N O F A P R O J E C T R E P O R T A N D N V I R O N M E N T A L D O C U M E N T F O R T H E C A J A L C O / I N T E ' S T A T E 1 5 I N T E R C H A N G E P a r t i e s a n d D a t e . 1 . 1 T h i s C o o p e r a t i v e A g r e e m d a y o f , 2 0 0 6 , b y a C o m m i s s i o n ( " C o m m i s s i o n " ) a n d t h e s o m e t i m e s r e f e r r e d t o i n t h i s A g r e e m " P a r t i e s " . 2 . R e c i t a l s . 2 . 1 T h e C i t y o f C o r o n a d e s i r e b e c a u s e o f c u r r e n t a n d p r o j e c t e d c o n g 2 . 2 T h e C i t y o f C o r o n a h C a j a l c o / I n t e r e s t a t e 1 5 i n t e r c h a n g e . 2 . 3 R C T C h a s p r e v i o u s l y a p e r f o r m a n c e o f p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t k n o w n a s t h e M i d - C o u n t y P a r k w a y P r 2 . 4 T h e M C P i s a n t i c i p a t e d t i m p a c t s f o r t h e C a j a l c o / I n t e r s t a t e 1 5 r e c o n s t r u c t i o n b y t h e C i t y . 2 . 5 C i t y a n d R C T C d e s i r e t o e x i s t i n g c o n t r a c t w i t h R C T C t o i n c E n v i r o n m e n t a l D o c u m e n t f o r t h e C a j a l c o f s u c h w o r k t o b e b o r n e b y t h e C i t A g r e e m e n t . 3 . T e r m s . n t ( " A g r e e m e n t " ) i s e x e c u t e d a n d e n t e r e d i n t o t h i s d b e t w e e n t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n i t y o f C o r o n a ( " C i t y " ) . C o m m i s s i o n a n d C i t y a r e n t i n d i v i d u a l l y a s " P a r t y " a n d c o l l e c t i v e l y a s t h e t o e x p e d i t e i m p r o v e m e n t s a t C a j a l c o / I n t e r s t a t e 1 5 s t i o n a t t h i s l o c a t i o n . s i d e n t i f i e d l o c a l f u n d i n g t o r e c o n s t r u c t t h e a r d e d a c o n t r a c t t o J a c o b s C i v i l , I n c . f o r t h e o r k i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t j e c t ( " M C P " ) . i n t e r s e c t I n t e r s t a t e 1 5 i n C o r o n a a n d c r e a t e t r a f f i c i n t e r c h a n g e i n C o r o n a , w h i c h i s s c h e d u l e d f o r m e n d J a c o b s C i v i l , I n c . ' s s c o p e o f w o r k u n d e r t h e . u d e t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f a P r o j e c t R e p o r t a n d / I n t e r s t a t e 1 5 R e c o n s t r u c t i o n P r o j e c t , w i t h t h e c o s t u n d e r t h e t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s s e t f o r t h i n t h i s 3 . 1 E f f e c t i v e D a t e . T h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l t a k e e f f e c t o n t h e d a t e , o n w h i c h t h i s i A g r e e m e n t i s a p p r o v e d a n d e x e c u t e d y a l l o f t h e P a r t i e s ( " E f f e c t i v e D a t e " ) . 3 . 2 T e r m . T h e t e r m o f t h i s A r e e m e n t s h a l l b e f r o m t h e E f f e c t i v e D a t e u n t i l t h e d a t e t h e S e r v i c e s ( a s d e f i n e d h e r e i n ) . r e c o m p l e t e d . R V P O B I A M O R R I S \ 7 1 8 9 9 8 . 1 4 8 3.3 Award of Change Order. RCTC shall execute and award a change order to Jacobs Civil, Inc., at the rates and under the terms and conditions specified in the contract between RCTC and Jacobs Civil, Inc., for the performance of the Services (as defined herein). 3.4 Description of Services. The Services to be provided by Jacobs Civil, Inc. under the change order described in Section 3.3 shall consist of the preparation of a Project Report and. Environmental Document for the Cajalco/Interstate 15 Reconstruction Project, including [insert details of Project Study Report; attach as Exhibit "A" if necessary.](the "Services"). 3.4.1 Amendments to Services. City may request, in writing; the provision of services in addition to those Services described herein. Changes or additions to the Services are subject to the approval of RCTC, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any change or addition to the Services may require a revision to compensation to be paid by City as set forth herein. 3.5 Payment for Services. 3.5.1 Funding of the Services.. City shall bear the entire cost of the Services, as billed to RCTC by Jacobs Civil, Inc, and shall fund this work with local dollars. 3.5.2 Payment of Compensation. At its option, RCTC may submit monthly invoices to City or submit a single invoice upon completion of the Services. All invoices shall includea copy of the Jacobs Civil, Inc. invoice to RCTC for which reimbursement is sought, along with copies of any supporting documentation provided by Jacobs Civil, Inc. to RCTC. City shall pay all invoices submitted to City by RCTC within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. 3.6 Schedule of Services. In consultation with City, RCTC shall require Jacobs Civil, Inc. to provide a schedule for completion of the Services, including milestone dates for completion of discrete portions of the Services jointly identified by City and Jacobs Civil, Inc. 3.7 Party Representatives. 3.7.1 RCTC's Representative. RCTC's Executive Director, or his designee, shall serve as RCTC's Representative and shall have the authority to act on behalf of. RCTC for all purposes under this Agreement. 3.7.2 City's Representative. City hereby designates the Public Works Director or his designee as City's Representative to RCTC. City's Representative shall have the authority to act on behalf of City for all purposes under this Agreement. City's Representative shall work closely and cooperate fully. with RCTC's Representative. 3.8 Termination. R V P UB W M ORRIS1718998.1 49 " 3 . 8 . 1 T e r m i n a t i o n b y R O T C ; N o t i c e . R C T C m a y , b y w r i t t e n n o t i c e t o C i t y , t e r m i n a t e t h i s A g r e e m e n t f o r c a u s e i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t a t a n y t i m e , b y g i v i n g w r i t t e n n o t i c e t o C i t y o f s u c h t e r m i n a t i o n a n d s p e c i f y i n g t h e e f f e c t i v e d a t e t h e r e o f . 3 . 8 . 2 T e r m i n a t i o n b y C i t y ; N o t i c e . C i t y m a y t e r m i n a t e t h i s A g r e e m e n t f o r c a u s e i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t y a t a n y t i m e , b y g i v i n g w r i t t e n n o t i c e t o R C T C o f s u c h t e r m i n a t i o n a n d s p e c i f y i n g t h e e f f e c t i v e d a t e t h e r e o f . 3 . 8 . 3 R C T C ' s O b l i g a t i o n s U p o n T e r m i n a t i o n . U p o n t e r m i n a t i o n o r c o m p l e t i o n o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t , R C T C s h a l l p r o v i d e t o C i t y c o p i e s o f a l l m a t e r i a l s , d o c u m e n t s , r e s e a r c h , a n d d a t a p r o d u c e d b y J a c o b s C i v i l , I n c . a s p a r t o f t h e S e r v i c e s . P r i o r t o p r o v i d i n g s u c h c o p i e s , R C T C s h a l l c o n s u l t w i t h C i t y r e g a r d i n g w h e t h e r C i t y h a s a l r e a d y o b t a i n e d c o p i e s o f a l l s u c h m a . e r i a l s d i r e c t l y f r o m J a c o b s C i v i l , I n c . 3 . 8 . 4 C i t y ' s O b l i g a t i o n s U p o n T e r m i n a t i o n . C i t y s h a l l r e i m b u r s e C o m m i s s i o n f o r a l l S e r v i c e s c o m p l e t e d b y J a c o b s C i v i l , I n c . u p t o t h e e f f e c t i v e d a t e o f t h e t e r m i n a t i o n , w h e t h e r o r n o t a n i n v o i c e f o r s u c h S e r v i c e s h a s b e e n r e c e i v e d a s o f t h e t e r m i n a t i o n d a t e , a s s e t f o r t h i n t h e f i n a l i n v o i c e s u b m i t t e d t o C i t y b y R C T C , b a s e d u p o n t h e f i n a l i n v o i c e s u b m i t t e d t o R C T C b y J a c o b s C i v i l , I n c . 3 . 9 I n d e m n i f i c a t i o n . 3 . 9 . 1 C i t y ' s I n d e m n i f i c a t i o n R e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s . C i t y a g r e e s t o i n d e m n i f y a n d h o l d h a r m l e s s R C T C , i t s o f f i c e r s , a g e n t s , c o n s u l t a n t s , a n d e m p l o y e e s f r o m a n y a n d a l l c l a i m s , d e m a n d s , c o s t s o r l i a b i l i t y a r i s i n g f r o m o r c o n n e c t e d w i t h a l l a c t i v i t i e s g o v e r n e d b y t h i s A g r e e m e n t , d u e t o n e g l i g e n t a c t s , e r r o r s o r o m i s s i o n s o r w i l l f u l m i s c o n d u c t o f C i t y , o r a n y o f i t s o f f i c e r s , a g e n t s , c o n s u l t a n t s , a n d e m p l o y e e s . C i t y w i l l r e i m b u r s e R C T C f o r a n y e x p e n d i t u r e s , i n c l u d i n g r e a s o n a b l e a t t o r n e y s ' f e e s , i n c u r r e d b y R C T C , i n d e f e n d i n g a g a i n s t c l a i m s u l t i m a t e l y d e t e r m i n e d t o b e d u e t o n e g l i g e n t a c t s , e r r o r s o r o m i s s i o n s o r w i l l f u l m i s c o n d u c t o f C i t y o r a n y o f i t s o f f i c e r s , a g e n t s , c o n s u l t a n t s , a n d e m p l o y e e s . 3 . 9 . 2 R C T C ' s I n d e m n i f i c a t i o n R e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s . R C T C a g r e e s t o i n d e m n i f y a n d h o l d h a r m l e s s C i t y a n d i t s o f f i c e r s , a g e n t s , c o n s u l t a n t s , a n d e m p l o y e e s f r o m a n y a n d a �%I c l a i m s , d e m a n d s , c o s t s o r l i a b i l i t y a r i s i n g f r o m o r c o n n e c t e d w i t h a l l a c t i v i t i e s g o v e r n e d b y t h i s A g r e e m e n t , d u e t o n e g l i g e n t a c t s , e r r o r s o r o m i s s i o n s o r w i l l f u l m i s c o n d u c t o f R C T C , o r i t s o f f i c e r s , a g e n t s , c o n s u l t a n t s a n d e m p l o y e e s . R C T C w i l l r e i m b u r s e C i t y f o r a n y e x p e n d i t u r e s , i n c l u d i n g r e a s o n a b l e a t t o r n e y ' s f e e s , i n c u r r e d b y C i t y i n d e f e n d i n g a g a i n s t c l a i m s u l t i m a t e l y d e t e r m i n e d t o b e d u e t o n e g l i g e n t a c t s , e r r o r s o r o m i s s i o n s o r w i l l f u l m i s c o n d u c t o f R C T C , i t s o f f i c e r s , a g e n t s , c o n s u l t a n t s a n d e m p l o y e e s . . 3 . 1 0 P r o g r e s s R e p o r t s . C i t y m a y r e q u e s t R C T C t o i n f o r m C i t y o f d e l a y s i n t h e c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e S e r v i c e s a n d p r o v i d e C i t y w i t h p r o g r e s s r e p o r t s . 3 . 1 1 G o v e r n i n g L a w . T h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l b e g o v e r n e d b y a n d c o n s t r u e d w i t h t h e l a w s o f t h e S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a . V e n u e s h a l l b e i n C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e . R V P U B I A M O R R I S \ 7 1 8 9 9 8 . I 5 0 3.12 Attorneys' Fees. If any Party commences an action against any other Party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing Party reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit. 3.13 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.14 Notification. All notices hereunder and communications 'regarding interpretation of the terms of the Agreement or changes thereto shall be provided by the mailing thereof by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: City of Corona 400 S. Vicentia Avenue Corona, California 92882 ATTN: Public Works Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 ATTN: Executive Director Any notice so given shall be considered served on the other party three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and addressed to the Party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred regardless of the method of service. 3.15 Contract Amendment. In the event that the Parties determine that the provisions of this Agreement should be altered, the Parties may execute a contract amendment to add any provision to this Agreement, or delete or amend any provision of this Agreement. All such contract amendments must be in the form of a written instrument signed by the original signatories to this Agreement, or their successors or designees. 3.16 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any previous agreements or understandings. 3.17 Validitv of Agreement. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement. 3.18 Independent Contractors. Jacobs Civil, Inc., and any other person or entities retained by RCTC or any consultant in connection with this Agreement or Services shall be retained on an independent contractor basis and shall not be employees of City. RCTC shall require Jacobs Civil, Inc. and any other person or entities retained to pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of the Services and as required by law: RV PUBIAM OR R IS1718998.1 51 [signatures RV PUB\AMORRI S\718998.1 on the following page] 52 SIGNATURE PAGE TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CITY OF CORONA RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATON COMMISSION By: By: Karen Spiegel Marion Ashley Mayor Chairman , APPROVED AS TO FORM:: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: City Attorney Legal Counsel R VPUBIAM ORR IS\718998.1 53 R V PU B\AMORRIS\718998.1 =XHIBIT "A" DESCRIP ION OF SERVICES (Will be incl ded in final agreement) Exhibit "A" 54 " i A G E N A I T E M 1 0 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : A u g u s t 2 8 , 2 0 0 6 T O : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e F R O M : S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : C i t y o f C o r o n a T r a n s p o r t a t i o n R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l P r o g r a m m i n g C e r r i t o R o a d P r o j e c t s U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e ( T U M F ) R e q u e s t f o r G r e e n R i v e r R o a d a n d . . E 1 S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e t h e r e p r o g r a m p r o j e c t t o i n c l u d e $ 2 0 f o r t h e d e s i g n p h a s e , a 2 ) A p p r o v e e x t e n d i n g l i m i t D r i v e f o r p l a n s , s p e c i f i o n l y ; 3 ) A p p r o v e T U M F R e g i o n a G r e e n R i v e r R o a d p r o j e c i n g o f T U M F f u n d s f o r t h e G r e e n R i v e r R o a d ' , 0 0 0 f o r t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l p h a s e , $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 d $ 3 , 4 4 2 , 0 0 0 f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n ; o n t h e G r e e n R i v e r R o a d p r o j e c t t o P a l i s a d e s a t i o n s , a n d c o s t e s t i m a t e ( P S & E ) d e s i g n w o r k A r t e r i a l P r o g r a m f u n d s f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e f r o m S R - 9 1 t o D o m i n g u e z R a n c h R o a d ; 4 ) A p p r o v e t h e p r o g r a m m n g o f $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 i n T U M F f u n d s f o r t h e E l C e r r i t o R o a d / I - 1 5 I n t e r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t t o i n c l u d e $ 1 2 0 , 0 0 0 p r e v i o u s l y p o g r a m m e d f o r r i g h t o f w a y a n d $ 8 8 0 , 0 0 0 i n a d d i t i o n a l f u n d i n g f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e ; 5 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r m a , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o a m e n d a n d / o r e x e c u t e n e w a g r e e m e n t s o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o r e f l e c t t h e a b o v e c h a n g s ; 6 ) A p p r o v e a n a m e n d m e n t o t h e F Y 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 b u d g e t i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 1 , 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 ; a n d 7 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : I n S e p t e m b e r , 2 0 0 4 t h e C o m m i s s i o f u n d s t o t h e c i t y o f C o r o n a ( C i t y ) D o m i n g u e z R a n c h R o a d ( $ 4 . 2 4 2 m i l 1 5 I n t e r c h a n g e ( $ . 1 2 0 m i l l i o n f o r p r o g r a m m i n g $ 1 . 5 0 5 m i l l i o n r e q u e u n t i l t h e p r o j e c t w a s r e a d y t o b e c o p r o g r a m m e d T U M F R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l P r o g r a m m p r o v e m e n t s o n G r e e n R i v e r R o a d , S R - 9 1 t o i o n f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n ) a n d t h e E l C e r r i t o R o a d / 1 - r i g h t o f w a y ) . T h e C o m m i s s i o n h e l d o f f t e d f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e E l C e r r i t o p r o j e c t s t r u c t e d . 5 5 The City is requesting the following: 1) programming of the construction: funds for the El Cerrito project; 2) adjusting the funds programmed for the Green River Road project to cover early phases of project development previously anticipated to be funded by private development; and 3) programmingfunds for design of an additional segment of Green River Road from Dominguez Ranch Road to Palisades Drive in order to keep the project moving forward and avoid a gap in the improvements. Green River Road Improvements At the time of the original request for funding, the City anticipated funding participation from developers to cover all of the project' development work for the improvements on Green River Road (from Dominguez Ranch Road to SR-91) and requested funds only for construction. The development has not proceeded as planned and the City wants to proceed with the project on its original` schedule. It is requesting a portion of TUMF funding in the amount of $600,000 currently approved for construction to be used for the environmental and design phases. In addition, as part of the 2005 TUMF Nexus update, the limits eligible for TUMF funding were extended easterly, approximately 2,800 feet, from Dominguez Ranch Road to Palisades Drive. This segment is not part of the Commission's TUMF Regional Arterial .Program; however, the City is requesting the use of $200,000 of the TUMF funds programmed for the Dominguez Ranch Road to SR-91 segment for the .design phase of Dominguez Ranch Road to Palisades: segment so the design of both segments will be consistent and completed on scheduler The City will request all additional TUMF funds for right of way and construction of the Dominguez Ranch Road to Palisades segment from the .Western. Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG),TUMF Zone Program.' The request is summarized as .follows: Project Description: Green River Road, SR-91 to Dominguez Ranch Road and SR-91 to Palisades Drive for project development phases only. TUMF Funding ( in 000's Fiscal Year PA&ED PS&E R/W Cons Total 2005/06 $ 4,242 4"— 7242 2006/07 $ 200 $ 600 - $ 800 2007/08 $ 3442 $ , 3,442 Total $ 200 $ 600 .$ 3,442 $ 4,242. 1 56 " " C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h e r e p r o g r a m m i n g o f f u n d s a m o n g t h t o t a l a p p r o v e d a l l o c a t i o n o f $ 4 . 2 4 2 R a n c h R o a d t o P a l i s a d e s t o p r o v i d s e g m e n t s . F u n d i n g t h e d e s i g n f o r b a n d w i l l e n s u r e t h a t t h e d e s i g n o f b s c h e d u l e . H o w e v e r , s t a f f r e c o m m e o f w a y a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e s e g D r i v e b e f u n d e d b y t h e W R C O G T U P r o g r a m f r o m b e i n g o v e r p r o g r a m m e E l C e r r i t o R o a d / I - 1 5 I n t e r c h a n g e I m p T h e E l C e r r i t o R o a d / I - 1 5 p r o j e c t a p t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n c l u d e d i m p r o v e m a n d t h e i n t e r c h a n g e a t 1 - 1 5 . T h e C o f w a y p h a s e a n d h e l d o f f p r o c o n s t r u c t i o n u n t i l t h e p r o j e c t w a s r p r o j e c t i n t w o p h a s e s . P h a s e I i s t h e r e a l i g n m e n t o f B e d f o r T h e p r o j e c t i s a j o i n t p r o j e c t b e t w e c u r r e n t l y u n d e r c o n s t r u c t i o n . T h e e s t i m a t e d a t $ 1 . 7 m i l l i o n . T h e C i $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 i n T U M F f u n d s f o r c o n s t r b a l a n c e o f t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n c o s t . T h e s e c o n d p h a s e o f t h e p r o j e c t i s t o f f - r a m p s , r a m p m e t e r i n s t a l l a t i o n s E l C e r r i t o b e t w e e n B e d f o r d C a n y o n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h i s p h a s e i s e s t i m a t a p p r o v a l o f t h e C i t y ' s r e q u e s t g i v e n t h a t t h e . p r o j e c t p h a s e s r e m a i n s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e m i l l i o n a n d e x t e n d t h e l i m i t s f r o m D o m i n g u e z f u n d i n g f o r t h e d e s i g n w o r k f o r t h e s e t w o t h s e g m e n t s a t o n e t i m e w i l l b e c o s t e f f e c t i v e t h s e g m e n t s i s c o o r d i n a t e d a n d c o m p l e t e d o n d s t h a t a l l a d d i t i o n a l f u n d i n g n e e d e d f o r r i g h t e n t f r o m D o m i n g u e z R a n c h R o a d t o P a l i s a d e s F Z o n e P r o g r a m t o k e e p t h e R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l o v e m e n t s r o v e d f o r R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l T U M F f u n d i n g b y , n t s t o B e d f o r d C a n y o n R o a d , E l C e r r i t o R o a d . m m i s s i o n p r o g r a m m e d $ 1 2 0 , 0 0 0 f o r t h e r i g h t r a m m i n g a n a d d i t i o n a l $ 1 . 5 0 5 m i l l i o n f o r a d y t o p r o c e e d . T h e C i t y i s c o n s t r u c t i n g t h i s C a n y o n o u t s i d e o f t h e C a l t r a n s r i g h t o f w a y . n t h e c o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e a n d t h e C i t y a n d i s t o t a l c o s t f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h i s p h a s e i s , y i s r e q u e s t i n g t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o p r o g r a m c t i o n i n F Y 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 w i t h t h e C i t y f u n d i n g t h e e w i d e n i n g o f t h e s o u t h b o u n d a n d n o r t h b o u n d n d t r a f f i c s i g n a l s a t t h e r a m p , a n d w i d e n i n g o f . n d t h e n o r t h b o u n d r a m p s . T h e t o t a l c o s t f o r d a t $ 1 . 8 m i l l i o n . T h e r e i s c u r r e n t l y $ 1 2 0 , 0 0 0 o f T U M F f u n d s p r o g r a m m e d i n t h e r g h t o f w a y p h a s e i n F Y 2 0 0 5 / 0 6 , a n d t h e C i t y i s r e q u e s t i n g t h a t t h e s e f u n d s b e r 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 . T h e C i t y i s a l s o r e q u e s t i p r o g r a m m e d i n F Y 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 f o r a s e c o n d p h a s e . I t s h o u l d a l s o b e t o w a r d t h e i n t e r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n f u n d s . p r o g r a m m e d f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e i n F Y g a n a d d i t i o n a l $ 6 8 0 , 0 0 0 o f T U M F f u n d s b e o t a l o f $ 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e o t e d t h a t C a l t r a n s i s c o n t r i b u t i n g $ 7 5 0 , 0 0 0 s , a n d t h e C i t y w i l l . f u n d t h e b a l a n c e w i t h l o c a l 5 7 The request is summarized as follows: Project Description: El Cerrito Road/1-15 Interchange capacity — Bedford Canyon Road to the 1-15 Northbound ramps TUMF Funding (in 000's) Fiscal Year PA&ED PS&E R/W Cons Total 2005/06 $ 120 $ 120 2006/07 $ 1.000 $ 1.000 Total $ 1.000 $ 1.000 Note - $1,000 = $200 construction in Phase 1, and $800 in Phase 2. Staff recommends programming the $200,000 of TUMF funds for construction of the phase 1 project, reprogramming the $120,000 of currently allocated funding from right of way to construction for phase 2. Staff also recommends programming an additional $680,000 for a total $1 million for construction of the two phases of this project. An amendment to the FY 2006/07 budget in the amount of $1,300,000 is required, as the FY 2006/07 budget includes only $500,000 for the Green River Road project. Should the Commission approve the funding requests, staff will work with the City to amend the existing Green River Road project agreement and develop an agreement for the El Cerrito project to reflect the actions included in this agenda item. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2006/07 - Amount: $1,300,000 Source of Funds: TUMF Regional Arterial Budget Adjustment. Yes GLA No.: 210-72-81301 P5101 Corona - El Cerrito Road @1-15 210-72-81101 P5103 Corona - Green River/Dominguez Ranch SR-91 $1 000,000 $300,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: Attachment: TUMF Programming Request from city of Corona 58 OFFICE OF: ,14 PWA-038-05 . ri3ERRsitlEaUoi D.1 B3135 ;1 dQ1 1025 /21 206 PUBLIC WORKS €3EPARTENT 400 SOUTH VICENTIA AVENUE,, Pp. EOX"94©, QQRONA, C;AL1 COFIoNA C11Y Halt t]NLINE, ALL THE TA/E. fhttp.!lwww,discov0 :Cathy Bechtel, Deputy ©ireetor of Planning Riverside -County Trenseertation Gomm scion 4000 Lemon.Street, 3rd-Fl, `Riverside, CA 92502=2208 The -City"-of gram wOtild like-ttrnrequest fhe --referenced-projects:.;, SAL=--Tt1 Iltixn-ng en iil+ler Road Projectis'regt,esCin a change the project limits easterly fratn ,0oMinguez Ftaneft: th6 TUMF,aliocetiens by $200;60©;:,and t© move a=Rwt�c the ernount-. f $800,000 for OA&ED,ei-d f'S&E Eturr'rig;tEe epplicati�n:process,:fcs fiai Iicipanon frofn developers for P as planned .The City vJould like developRient. To' eehieve this we;_iui tfte limits of the preilect-toEafisedes fJ adopted-- 2005 network .costs ,i4 prpgsed'extension will increage,the p ver Road°-m front - ,cif an;eXas3tnp pesing td';conetruct minimal impr©v _aiiequ'ate-transitior4e the hevsi Yee �irnprov ents Jur. _Green; . ,ClevelOphrienvis--7.exerript _from p profect development-;c eppr©zimately ";$ 604;001 design ihe_reech hetvoe� e: P aEsoaprta errterks`f�Pm fJsri pi'ovi JUG, 2 E1 Cerrrtts FtridJl i5 1r% sctedule.it wden`EI der ltzi-i issues Tlxe CO, is rtsgUrst Irnprovenient_fih'olect» n ardE prt+)eGt','sn tvvii.Welt3ets"=es%1 d..d+avel �Mesehbn pre ,td8 0 cost wee' elisedes fot ,aridtfii A:82$78,t eriftxtent_�tf current areemt ti oaif ttrf atisades D,riye, tv_ineneas of currehvy eppr©prratsd funds=i �._: 0 giort FRihtrflay The ft_i*eird -i ith thte- o modd these-0e"af e propt?sed exte SIOni prppttd sxtenai• tn t rllrtiits appra�tt'# atSd. City tr tYterrt nas tltfc:prtr indepertdetttly fr fie project k3y ex� cE}ilforlYt�i}ca� � Palisades [rtve 1 antf _17+iit9 ' sfun A, aaliartr e of Bedford -e,an og'{Vfiark v. The p entail„ reeligriing Bedford Carryon' sighalizetion tttthe itite cYi n of Bedford/EI Cerrito antf,._ _widening EI Cerrito to. -add oneifene tryea fi irecnsrri is en GT Right df Wayfi7ne aril Bedford Canyon. This projectiis currently uder. oottrti t rs""Lt:is ' '-tly fundett;by+_the C©unty`of Riveraide and the City of Corona in. C1ct€zber,2 4,1tstaI ce0401-,costs_©f`tho- project were estimated;tobe'S955, 870: Tetiet� the Cityhas-expended'over a $]-rndlr©n on the project.. The total .esti nated,Capitti costs'wtp`be apprtiz�`37.5 to•81-.7 million. Ftie=_ City is requesting $2pp,g0© fo cave_wlden�rig costs tin,l Cerrito Rd, The balarice:vriil'be r' covered bylocal fund8: �' - - El Certitd/I-9 5 jnterchange dogrei%s?{if3ttirk= ntails widening the southbeund off;re ?titer -on the nerthbdund on,remp Onstal]&ticrrt:d 1`CetritO between Bedfierd-Carii on attd tf€e nort tintributi©n of. $ 75©;q00 frorn'Galt ans -iowsi nticipate the project costs to be appt©ximata Currently, the apdva project h We are requesting tharthesi3 Ilddi#i©nelly _:vve are -. rrtrjds59 2©06/2€Jb7 harafs yott foryour corisii er k'961-39 ;4823 or y©it ca S 12t3,607,pio ands frs--�xritttre to CeItian 1Ri rts-of-V'tav#:,The ,Cjstir t i3ul d is -ramp, iristallatton of,rarnp: fftc sE hafs at the ramps and,wideri nr dtnd ar[tps The�City:.wi t 6e.r aciytrig a, s�i r#t r hehge improVerne t e; 1!1B illion. s Rf?W era F_Y.200 uction it},1:Y 206, f{zr �onstructtpt,_°°,=ie AGEND • A ITEM 1 1 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : A u g u s t 2 8 , 2 0 0 6 T O : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e F R O M : S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o c r a m M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : M e m o r a n d u m o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o r r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t U n d e r s t a n d i n g b e t w e e n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . m i s s i o n a n d C i t y o f B l y t h e R e g a r d i n g S t a t e P r o g r a m I n t r a - c o u n t y F o r m u l a F u n d i n g S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e M e m o r a n d u m o f U n d e r s t a n d i n g ( M O U ) N o . 0 7 - 7 1 - 0 2 8 w i t h c i t y o f B l y t h e ( C i t y ) t r a d i n g a t o t a l o f $ 2 , 2 9 1 , 6 5 6 o f S t a t e . T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( S T I P ) I n t r a - c o u n t y P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y f o r m u l a f u n d s w t h M e a s u r e A W e s t e r n C o u n t y H i g h w a y f u n d s ; a n d 2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : A t t h e J a n u a r y 1 1 , 2 0 0 6 C o m m i s s 2 0 0 6 S T I P I n t r a - c o u n t y P a l o V e r ; $ 4 1 6 , 6 5 6 w i t h M e a s u r e A f u n d s . p r o g r a m m i n g l o c a l a r t e r i a l p r o j e c t s d i r e c t e d t o d e v e l o p a M e m o r a n d u m ( a t t a c h e d ) . S u b s e q u e n t t o t h e J a n u a r y 1 1 , 2 0 i n r e s p o n s e t o a d e c r e a s e i n S T I P f o f t w o S T I P p r o j e c t s i n t h e C i t y t o I n t a k e B o u l e v a r d a n d L o v e k i n B o u l S T I P c y c l e s . G i v e n t h a t t h e s e l o c a l S T I P f u n d s a r e l i m i t e d , s t a f f f e l t i t M e a s u r e A W e s t e r n C o u n t y H i g h w m e e t i n g p r o j e c t s c h e d u l e s a n d n o t c V e r d e V a l l e y S T I P f u n d s i n t h e $ 4 1 6 , 6 5 6 ) w i l l b e p r o g r a m m e d b h i g h w a y p r o j e c t s i n t h e 2 0 0 8 S T I P o n m e e t i n g , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d t r a d i n g e V a l l e y F o r m u l a f u n d s i n t h e a m o u n t o f T h i s a c t i o n r e s u l t e d f r o m p a s t d i f f i c u l t i e s i n i n t h e P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y . S t a f f w a s a l s o f U n d e r s t a n d i n g ( M O U ) w i t h t h e c i t y o f B l y t h e 6 a c t i o n , t h e 2 0 0 6 S T I P p r o p o s a l w a s r e v i s e d n d i n g a v a i l a b i l i t y . T h i s r e s u l t e d i n t h e r e m o v a l a l i n g $ 1 , 8 7 5 , 0 0 0 . T h e s e p r o j e c t s l o c a t e d o n y a r d w e r e o r i g i n a l l y p r o g r a m m e d i n p r e v i o u s a r t e r i a l p r o j e c t s a r e l o w p r i o r i t y p r o j e c t s w h e n o u l d b e i n t h e b e s t i n t e r e s t t o t r a d e t h e m w i t h y f u n d s s o t h a t t h e y h a v e a b e t t e r c h a n c e o f n t i n u e b e i n g d e l a y e d i n t h e S T I P . I n t u r n , P a l o a m o u n t o f $ 2 , 2 9 1 , 6 5 6 ( $ 1 , 8 7 5 , 0 0 0 a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n o n W e s t e r n C o u n t y s t a t e c y c l e . T h e C i t y w i l l b e r e q u i r e d t o a m e n d i t s 6 1 Measure A Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to include the Intake and Lovekin projects. The attached MOU outlines the terms of the agreement and does not impact the current STIP Intra-county Formula. The STIP trade is proposed to continue in future STIP cycles. The amount of the trade for future STIP cycles will be based on the STIP antra -county formula for Palo Verde Valley and will also consider interest impacts and the color of STIP funds. STIP funding for the 2006 STIP cycle is state cash; however, federal funds could be allocated to "future STIP funded projects. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2006/07 Amount: $2,291,656 Source of Funds: Measure A Budget Ad ustment: ' Yes GLA No.: 222-31-81301 P3994 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Dater Attachment: MOU Blythe-RCTC STIP Fund Trade 62 MEMORAND RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND TH FOR TRADING STATE TRANS INTRA-COUNTY PALO 1. PARTIES AND DATE This Memorandum ofUnderstandi (STIP) Infra -county Palo Verde Valley fo of , 2006 by and betwee COMMISSION ("Commission") and the 2. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission allocate Intra-county Formula: W 2.2 The city of Blythe is respo Verde Valley Formula fun 2.3 Due to programming cons totaling $1,875,000 were 2.4 The California Transporta highway projects. 2.5 Local arterial improveme 2.6 State highway improveme 2.7 On January 11, 2006, the Palo Verde Valley Form Western County Highway the STIP. #07-71-028 M OF UNDERSTANDING ETWEEN RANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITY OF BLYTHE ORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ERDE VALLEY FORMULA FUNDS g for trading State Transportation Improvement Program ula funds is made and entered into as of this day the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ity of Blythe. STIP funds to three sub -regions per the adopted STIP stern County, Eastern County, and Palo. Verde Valley. sible for selecting projects for STIP Intra-county Palo s. raints, two projects programmed in Palo Verde Valley eleted from the 2006 STIP. on Commission continues to give higher priority to state projects are a priority in the Palo Verde Valley. t projects are a priority in Western County. ommission approved trading 2006 STIP Intra-county la funds in the amount of $416,656 for Measure A ds due to the low priority of local arterial projects in Page 1 of 3 63 3. TERMS 3.1 The agreement is to trade a total of $2,291,656 of STIP Intra-county Formula funds that were allocated to Palo Verde Valley ($1,875,000 de -programmed from the 2004 STIP and $416,656 of 2006 STIP Intra-county Formula funds that were unable to be programmed in the 2006 STIP) for Measure A Western. County Highway funds. 3.2 The Commission will program $2,291,656 of STIP Intra-county Palo Verde Valley Formula funds in the next STIP cycle on a Western County highway project(s) to, be determined at the Commission's discretion. 3.3 The city of Blythe will amend its Measure A Capital Improvement Program to include the $1,875,000 of programming for the projects deleted in the 2004 STIP: Intake Boulevard Widening project and Lovekin Boulevard Rehabilitation project. 3.4 The city of Blythe will amend its Measure A Capital. Improvement Program to include the January 11, 2006 fund trade of $416,656 and program these funds to eligible Measure A Capital Improvement Program projects. 3.5 Future STIP funds allocated to the Palo Verde Valley per the STIP Intra-county formula ,will be traded with Measure A Western County Highway funds and programmed on Western County Highway projects until such time that the parties agree to terminate this agreement. • 3.6 This MOU does not bear any impact to the current adopted STIP Intra-County Formula and is considered as a separate agreement between the Commission and the city of Blythe. 3.7 The fund trade will continue for future STIP cycles and the amount of the trade will be based upon the STIP Intra-county Formula allocation for Palo Verde Valley and will consider interest impacts and the color of STIP funding. Page 2 of 3 64 " I N W I T N E S S W H E R E O F , t h e p a r t i e s h a v e c a u s e d t h i s M O U t o b e e x e c u t e d b y t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e o f f i c e r s , d u l y a u t h o r i z e d . R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N B y : C h a i r A P P R O V E D A S T O F O R M : B e s t , B e s t & K r i e g e r L L P C o u n s e l t o t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n C I T Y O F B L Y T I I E B y : T i t l e : A P P R O V E D A S T O F O R M : B y : G e n e r a l C o u n s e l P a g e 3 o f 3 6 5 " A G E N A I T E M 1 2 i RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: August 28, 2006 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Claudia Chase, Property Min Saysay, Program Administrator Manager THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel, Project Delivery Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement Television (CCTV) Security for Maintenance of the Closed Circuit Systems at Metrolink Stations STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve Agreement Agreement No. 04-25- Maintenance Services," with Inland Vault & Se 2) Authorize the Chairma the Amendment to the 3) Forward to the Commis BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In June 2004, the Commission ente Vault & Security, Inc. (Inland Vault) maintenance services of the CC commuter rail stations. Inland Vault and is a professional contractor, ex public clients and licensed in the o. 04-25-962-02, Amendment No. 2 to 62, "Agreement for CCTV. Security Systems to amend the term and rates of the agreement urity, Inc.; , pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute greement on behalf of the Commission; and ion for final action. ed into Agreement No. 04-25-962 with Inland o provide periodic professional inspections and V Security Systems at the five Metrolink as selected based on the receipt of three bids erienced in providing maintenance services to tate of California. In 2005, the term of the agreement was amended to include an additional period of one year, to the original agreement. This amendment has ex•ired. Inland Vault is extremely knowledgable and experienced with the existing CCTV equipment at the Metrolink stations. Inland Vault provides labor, materials, tools, equipment, services and incidental and customary work necessary to adequately maintain the CCTV Security Syste s. Amending the agreement with Inland Vault retains its historical knowledge of the equipment and its understanding of the needs of the Commission to provide maximum security at the station properties. 66 Staff is very satisfied with .the performance of -Inland Vault and recommends authorization of a one (1) year amendment with two:(2) one year 'options to extend the agreement. The proposed rate for Agreement No. 04-25-962-02 is. $30,000 annually and has not been adjusted since the original agreement in 2004. Financial Information In fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2006/07 Amount: $30,000 Source of Funds: Local Transportation Funds Budget Ad ustment: No GLA No.: 103-25-73301 ,P oject 4001,02,03,04,06 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \14,_44ed.:41/ Date: 8/28/06 Attachment: Agreement No. 04-25-962-02 67 AMEN AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS (CCTV) 1. PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 2 to Maintenance Services is made and e 2006, by and between the RIVERS! ("Commission") and INLAND VAULT 3. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission and t dated June 8, 2004 for for the Closed Circuit T Agreement"). Agreement No. 04-25-962-02 MENT NO. 2 TO SERVICES FOR CLOSED CIRCUIT SECURITY T THE METROLINK STATIONS the Agreement for CCTV Security Systems tered into as of this day of E COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND SECURITY, INC. ("Consultant"). e Consu►tant have entered into an agreement the purpose of providing Maintenance Services levision (CCTV) Security Systems (the "Master 2.2 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into an Amendment No. 1 to the Master greement, dated October 25, 2005, for the purpose of extending th Master Agreement one (1) year. 2.3 The parties now desire term for an additional options and to provide maintenance services f TERMS 3.1 The term of the Master term of one year, com 2007 (the "Second E options. R V PUB\HSHANE\714236.1 o amend the Master Agreement to extend the ne (1) year, with two (2) additional one year dditional compensation in order to provide the r the CCTV Security Systems. Agreement shall be amended for an additional encing on July 1, 2006 and ending on June 30, tended Term") with two additional one year 3.2 The maximum compensation for the Second Extended Term shall not exceed $30,000.. Work shall be performed at the rates set forth in the Master Agreement. 3.3 Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Master Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Agreement on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY INLAND VAULT AND SECURITY, INC. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: Marion Ashley, Chair Signature APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Best, Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel RV PUB\HSHANE\714236.1 Name Title 69 " A G E N A I T E M 1 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY T NSPORTA-T/ON COMMISSION DATE: August 28, 2006 TO: Budget and Impleme tation Committee FROM: Jerry Rivera, Progra Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Ch of Financial Officer SUBJECT: FY 2007-1 1 Measur Local Streets and Ro Rancho Mirage A Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for ds for the Cities of Lake Elsinore, Norco and STAFF RECOMMENDATION This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the FY 2007- 1 Measure A Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets a d Roads for the cities of Lake Elsinore, Norco and Rancho Mirage as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commision for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Measure A Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive its Measure A disbursements. In addition, the cities in the Coachella Valley and the Count (representing the unincorporated area of the Eastern County) must be participating in Coachella Valley Association of Government's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee program. The agencies are required to submit the annual certi ication of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the .alculation. On April 10, 2006, Commission sta f provided the local agencies with Measure A revenue projections for local streets and roads to assist them in preparation of the required Five Year Capital Improve ent Program (CIP). The agencies were asked to submit their CIPs by June 1., 2006 for submission to the Budget and Implementation Committee at its J ne 26, 2006 meeting and to the Commission on July 12, 2006. At its July 12, 2006 meeting, the Commission approved the Plans for all but seven (7) cities: Beaumont, Calimesa, Cathedral City, Coachella, Lake Elsinore, Norco and Rancho Mirage. Subsequent! , we have received the required CIP, MOE certification and supporting docume tation from the cities of Lake Elsinore, Norco and Rancho Mirage. The other four ities have been informed that no disbursement 70 of Measure A funds for local streets and roads will be made until all of the required documents have been received and approved by the Commission.' Attachment: Measure A Capital Improvement Plans for Lake Elsinore, Norco and Rancho Mirage 71 " . . j e m s ' " " " , - _ - ' _ . . . . = , ' ; ' , , . 1 4 : - . L U P , ' V t 7 1 T s . " ' : , = " iE C4UNT]!-TRANSP+i tAT# COMMISSION il4 M1J�iiE "A"-1_OCA1, FUN S PROGRAM r=n.fx;008-q:2tlp7i Agency: City: , Prepa:ad Sy-: . _ *en Scum k dY, 'nginoer , Phone Na.S .„ � { 't}BT4:312a:6n.- Date. - 0711_- Corti; Gutter i Pioe am;, Annual Cosine t3at r Heidge - Raiynx Rem* AttioCeder =Relocate-Patvec}'xat a-- --070 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION _. IRE'A`, LOCAL FUNDS.PROGRAM `".. .FY no7 - Y408",�. Agency: City of Lake, Elsinor Prepared Br, ken Simnel() -Cdty Engineer Phone No.: (951 ) 674-a124 eat. 244 A I Tt P k m 6 PArEFFSIDE CC:AIN-TY TRANSPO • ANON -00034116.6.10N - NIF.ASURE 'A" LOCAL F ,' , b, PR66,4444. - . " FY 2663 - 2619,:...7. - A. :' . , .• ,.. , , Atien6y: City oe, E f Laklsinore . , l' Prepared Nr. -Kan Snornain- City Engineer ' ., - ." " - -- - . , Irrame No.: (351)674.-3124 ii*j: 244 , • • " „. „ , . . Pavement . Fnent-Prograrn- Ci#yueide $6.01.11enonstruckni & -.-• . ..„ • ..014.1nna1Curp, . . Annual TraffiniStriping:PrOgilarn---: ?.aAn trait s#ripirtg:01.10. : • .. • • • - . RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRARSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE'"A" LOCAL FAJNOSPROGRAM Agency: -City of Lake' Ereireare Premed By: Ken &monger City Engineer Phope (SSU ET4-3124 ext. 244 ITEM. PROJECT - -,PRO4ECT lit3. „ :Limn t -Pavement Nianoornere ROOM -Cilyeside Stterat'Reconelnicaon & Page 4 of 5. a's) FIA -"SOO - 'Annual Curb. Cot*, and -Sider** Rep* Curb, '1,4tor-onel. Woe* repair 3 Aneuel Treffru Sleeker P .reptarn Woman IcaffinnIT9109 and " Wpm* - :OL)R1Tf TRANSPORTATION;CONIM1 ION - IJ ^A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM - FY 2010=--22011' Agency. CIO of Lake �tsir�r� Prepared Sy: - KOOS. Phone N©. (951074-: i7aieC " 67119ro6 - iPROJECT NAME/ - .LIMITS:. RecanslcFa id e WlAlk #tePBir Cur3z, Ga iCar :and $i 4epralk I TidSiFip7no Program -'-- 1 Tibat'�t#ain t it"e sk�iP[r�;and'. Page OSE (5,000 y'01 tt (s.000$) 3900 lelol W62/J0tld SOWN 0 MOISSrwwo3 NOLL d ^1q 1�ri�a i •;S..y7xlS — ^anlfPiIIiH �S 43ki W S A u aaS — Ii IP�eI pu3Sa1iM1 'any aslac - i4 putoaatrW ES�aCI#!n� P3.�+:'anit 2trcas<tJ — nH=Aifg t ' fi aR '15 AV a �za35 ttt ttatt ' S !CIS pue S cr 'IS !�1-' �f M IA +t?iton ATIO V COMMIS 'tom ND ROADS PROGRAM T Pam Prepared by: VI111 PMhh�.yo�eneq *Lyy �90yO.-27t NORCO , Pro: iA 4 Al 0 AN0 q #iL AY sr air. Tem at Ave. itr.: ighth st 0, Reserver air, - aMortna Ave, Temesa Avg Parkridge Ave. _ nd' , tca gips Korner R ng It1nc { estern,.0 lr hoar 0Jan Ho 5..� Third St tie •r«a xI�,E�quel overtay; Sierira Ave. - to Thfrd St. � tteheisitit #io 7.res#view[. - iY�rt11 aC, to Slicth :. [ : Fte habit. (rivera 175 1.28 150 70. Measure A Funds (5000's) 60 175 128 70 250. 100 vc os oe os tos. St (5,000#} spun] v ainseaw Q©3)" anal 1:�tbtli?9 N111 d. 2#OdS111 ow, oars 1. Rt�tT i V# - Tit rct►Or: to /0Na �a 2. Mistitapecttts Sheet Averlays 3. HiNside Ave. Second S to ihird 5t ?t GoldeCi Giate Circle . 5. Norconian Dr.-Piorco 0r, topitl st._. S. M lah. ti tteconsb w lop - S1a t ©r•qr. ta-Slitkis S 8 Trafiilc SlgnaI Improvements 9 5lxth 5tx 5lgnal; 2rnpmvetnents Z0. StteeCatrlping4.Vaileas locations :;:1. ! MEscelianeous Seal Coats l3rm�ect �rype Overlay Overlay RehabtOyerlay• Rehab/Overlay .Rehab/Overlay Reconstrucbtc+n :13e hab%gtv.rl SFggnal Striping Seal Coats Maintenance 'l'ottai'Gos (>�000`s) 128 100 50 25 200 200 128 100 150 I5 200 200 554 554 50 50 _. I 5b 50 50 50 50 j 50 50 50 OF NOR Page-6- Of Prepared by. WILLIAM Pbane # 951-270-5607 Date: TUNE 15 2006 R.��Ct?tlNTY 1.51iR "A''L�6i P Protect Name( Limits Ilisetla�a►us Street Overlays Coruna Ave. --First St" tcs Second't Hillside Ave, —Seeond St. 'to,Third Misceiianeous. Street Reconsl ructi Tratki Signal irriproVetnen#s S.1 SS ig taprovements S %9 T Varlous Locatiana sceilaneai NSPORTA`TI©N COMMISS ON TS AND ROADS PROGRAM 2009 Overlay Reconstruction Signal Signal Striping Coats n Total C ($000's) Funds 250 275 200 50 50 0 250 275 400 200 50 50 30 50 50 50 50 VERS£DE;CO NORTATiON'COM0 r:AS" ++R "A "LOCAL STREL "S AND ROADS PRdGt FY2009 - 2010 Agency: i Y C3 NiiRCO Page rof $ Prep�rer by: WIt�IAM R: TH Plror # 951.270-SCs+07 ill 15�406 Tr3fl is Signal Irrtprrrvomen Hamner Aire. Signal Impcov #rlprng Yarioua Lo Mis Paiyem+rt Repa Overlay Rehab/Overlay Reconstruction Signal Signei Striping Total Cost ($000's) 250 250 200 5O Funds ( 0 250 250 200 50 sa 30; Agency: CITY t1F RiORCO Page 5 of Prepared by: Will TAM R. THf?MP$0 Phone # 951-270-5607 Date: JUNE 15, 2005; Project Name Ri„,.. Peak Rd :E COUNTY 7'RAN Pt3RTATIUN COMMI CAN `A"LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY2010 2031 Project Type Overlay Rehab/Overlay Reconstruction a Maintenance Total Cost ($000's) 250 180 50 50 30 50 Measure A Funds ($000's) 250 180 200 50 30 50 50 " " " C I T Y O F RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM EY 2006 - 2007 Agency: City of Ranch€t Mit ale Page t of 5 Prepared by: Bruce Harry, Diraorks Phone #. (7 ) 770-3224' Hate: June 1.2, 2006 C ityvvide ;crack sealing, slurry sealing, axinear asprtzdit t verlays end street acri ' _ern local ublic st%s iu: tkie Pia - s1a Fttl1 Cove, mute Sun Ranch; San Jaeitrfa, andl"irttge C:ovcY residential areas,.and arterial streets such as poriions tad Rarac ho Las Palmas Drive, Bob Hope Drive: 1 rank Sina4ra" Drive, Los Alamos Road, and DaValflarive. 13s�b I C Drive;; (Dinah Shor€ [ti ;C3inger Rogers) pavetnerrt + c csnsteuction and :asphalt rubber overlay. Plumley Road pavemesrt .tbid Ford to Dirtab Shore Drives.* Montet y Avenue" street iiakprovetn nts from (xerald Ford o Coiautry,Club Drives. -. arryoger;Pr© PRC?JEC T TYPE Preventative Maintenance/Pavemea�. Rehabilitation yx mentIir }iabilita Pave m- tit. Rehabilitation idening and Pavem+ Rehabilitation TOTALS TOTAL PROJECT COST ($0©0'S ) 4,0€r5 vtEAS CtR t A FUNDS ($000'S) 200 341 944 R Agency: City Page 2°af Prepared by: l3rr►ce Harry, Direr o of Public orks Phone th (7 ) 770-3224 Date: Jame 12, 20036 t?I�RSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ASURR «A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2007 - 2008 f Raneho Mirage City bber.aeraek sealing, rubber slurry; seating, asphalt iiverlays anti striping, on various public streets Monterey Avenue' Drive to Magnesia a nk Sinatra Drive asphalt mailer het tin ingsi le Drive to Monterey Avenue, s�verlay from Preventative Maintenance/Pavement Rehabilitation Widening and Pavement. _-Rehabilirneiixa TOTALS TOTAL PROJECT COST ($ OO'S) 400 850 4 0 MEASURE A ($000'S. 200 425 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE, "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2008 - 2009 Agency: City Rancho Mitagr Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Bruce Harr y, )7trc c Phone*: (760) 770-3224 Date: ;dune 12, 2006 a• of Public k TOTAL PROJECT TYPE PROJECT COST MOO'S) MEASURE A FPNi7S .(000'S) Citywide crack scaling, overlays and traffic striping on v cy Baling; us publi iTt#; highway 111 asphalt ri Ho .i?.a ive to east city l b kverlay fr asphalt m 13ob Pavement Maintenance 400 200 Paveme 850 400 Street-im overran rats ar local public streets with" Bob Hope Drive, "Gcrald Dinah: hore%r.. pavement rehabilitatio i of all Section=30 which is ,bordered by ord Drive, Monterey Avenue and Wide IM .Curb tiatd Gutter 4,896 and. Pavement Rehabilitation 462 1,062 9e` z6E mz (% 000 ±a y ar 0 \md)$ Oa ,I,Durowd a§�o+ VIOI O`600Z A. y OOSJ §dy0» 9&V\773#1§ Iv 01 NOISSMINIOD NO f1«04ANIV/I1: INI10 @rrnuo ! qqn_r '211Twos+ T\\ £ ¥ anotid « a)}aluAm\K \)jf a541,1 \§ } :Satiaty (5,000V V aNnsvaw 099 �oZI NOISSIBT IIOZ"{II Z SCIV011 (INV SEA OD NOT OclSi+,t�23C °u1:1 uo S:unrS 9()oz vZ£'(1l4(Q9G), agd aan q paasdoad 5 $ °314a tary� otioo , if : faua e AGEN e A ITEM 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY T NSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: August 28, 2006 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Jerry Rivera, Progra Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, C ief Financial Officer SUBJECT: FY 2006/07 Local Streets and Roads f -Transportation Funds Allocation for Local. r the Palo Verde Valley Apportionment Area , STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the allocation .f FY 2006/07 Local Transportation Funds for local streets and road , purposes in the Palo Verde Valley area as shown on the attached able; and 2) Forward to the Commision for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The estimated FY 2006/07 apportionment of Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for the Palo Verde Valley apportionment area is $1,005,325. Additional available funds include $302,828 of unalloca ed funds carried over from FY 2004/05, as per the audited financial statements, a d $347,817 from the FY 2005/06 mid -year adjustment. Accordingly, the total available LTF funds for the Palo Verde Valley area is $1,655,970. An Unmet Needs hearing was held n the city of Blythe on March 1, 2006, and it was subsequently determined that there were no unmet needs that could be reasonably met which allows the ommission to distribute any unallocated LTF funds for local streets and roads. T e Commission approved the Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA) Short Ra ge Transit Plan on July 12, 2006, allocating $759,075 to PVVTA. Therefore, a balance of $896,895 is available for local streets and roads purposes in the Pa o Verde Valley. The Palo Verde Valley apportionme t area is the only area in the county in which LTF dollars are still allocated for streets and roads purposes although no funds have been allocated since FY 2002/03. he attached table shows the allocations for the city of Blythe and the county o Riverside (County) based upon a formula previously approved by the Commission. Population figures are from the State Department of Finance E-5 report dated January 1, 2006 for fiscal year 2006-07, and have been adjusted to credit he prison population (4,037) at Chuckawalla State Prison to the County. 92 Following Commission approval of this allocation, the city of Blythe and the County will be formally notified that they must submit a claim in order to receive these funds. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N/A Year: FY 2006/07 Amount: N/A Source of Funds: Local Transportation Funds Budget Ad ustment: No GLA No.: N/A Fiscal Procedures Approved: \)Ue,i,t(te,_,Zit,v Date: 8/28/06 Attachment: Allocation of LTF Funds for Local Streets and Roads Table 93 " I i B l y t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y A g e n c y T O T A L A L L O C A T I F O R L O C A L P A L O V E F Y N O F L T F F U N D S T R E E T S A N D R O A D S D E V A L L E Y A R E A 2 0 0 6 / 0 7 T o t a l L e s s P o p u l a t i o n P e r e n t a " e S h a r e P V V T A 1 8 , 1 4 2 6 0 . 8 2 % $ 1 , 0 0 7 , 0 9 4 $ 3 7 9 , 5 3 8 1 1 , 6 8 9 3 9 . 1 8 % $ 6 4 8 , 8 7 6 $ 3 7 9 , 5 3 7 2 9 , 8 3 1 0 0 . 0 0 % $ 1 , 6 5 5 , 9 7 0 $ 7 5 9 , 0 7 5 A v a i l a b l e f o r S t r e e t s & R o a d s $ 6 2 7 , 5 5 6 $ 2 6 9 , 3 3 9 $ 8 9 6 , 8 9 5 N O T E : P o p u l a t i o n f o r C i t y o f B l y t h e e x c l u d e s . r i s o n p o p u l a t i o n o f 4 , 0 3 7 f o r C h u c k a w a l l a a s o f 1 / 1 / 0 6 , w h i c h i s i n c l u d e d i n C o u n t y p o p u l a t i o n . P r i s o n . o p u l a t i o n o b t a i n e d f r o m S t a t e D e p t . o f F i n a n c e , I D e m o g r a p h i c s D i v i s i o n . A p p r o v e d b y R C T C : 0 9 / 1 4 / 0 6 9 4 AGEN • A ITEM 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY T NSPORTAT/ON COMM/SS/ON DATE: August 28, 2006 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: John Standiford, Pu lic Affairs Director THROUGH:. Eric Haley, Executiv Director SUBJECT: State and Federal L gislative Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION This item is for the Committee to: 1) Adopt the following po Propositions 1 A & 1 B — 2) Direct staff to issue a advocacy services; and 3) Forward to the Commision for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Federal Update itions on statewide ballot propositions: SUPPORT; equest for Qualifications for federal legislative Congress has recessed until early S ptember but prior to leaving for their summer break, the Senate passed its versio of the Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development bill (HR 5576). The Senate's version differs from the'House's version on a few issue items and includes its own earmarks. The most important earmark for the Commission is the i clusion of $3 million for the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension. This project received the support of Senator Feinstein who is a member of the Appropriations Co mittee. The previously -approved House bill included the following earmarks in Riverside County: 1-10/Ramon Road Bob Hope Intercha State Route 60 Potrero Road Interch Grade Separations in Riverside Riverside and Corona Transit Center Riverside Transit Agency Bus Stop SunLine Transit Agency Bus Replac ge $ 500,000 nge $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $1,250,000 pgrades $ 250,000 ment $ 500,000 95 Also included in the House bill and which has been replicated in the Senate bill is funding for the control tower at Palm Springs International Airport. Final .approval of the bill and ,the fate of various projects and earmarks is not assured until Congress reconvenes, and it isbelieved that most major bills such as this one will not be addressed until after .the November elections. In late August, staff will travel to Washington, D.C. to meet with Federal Transit Administration officials regarding the Perris Valley Line project. It is hoped that the eventual outcome of the meeting will result in a favorable rating for the project A favorable rating along with Congressional funding will. solidify federal support and allow the Commission to move on to the next phase of engineering. Legislative Representation Since 1998, the Commission has contracted with San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG). for lobbying representation in Washington and Sacramento. The joint contracts with SANBAG were a natural outgrowth of the shared legislative affairs position that both agencies, funded from 1998 to 2004. SANBAG and the Commission no longer share a legislative affairs position, and, given the eventual expiration of the lobbying contracts later this year, it marks an opportune time for the Commission to seek its own legislative representation services and its own contract. The Commission recently awarded a contract to Smith, Watts & Company for state representation. The Commission's lobbyist in Washington is Cliff Madison, who works as a subcontractor to the Commission under the contract with SANBAG. Mr. Madison represents a number of transportation industry clients including LA Metro, Fed Ex and a number of major airports. He maintains excellent relationships with elected officials, federal agencies and committee staffs. Given the long-standing nature of the arrangementwith one firm and the Commission's contracting processes, it would be prudent to issue a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in order to complete a contract prior to the end of the current agreement in December. Staff intends to issue the FIFO in mid to late September with evaluations of the proposals to take place in .late October. Staff would return to the Commission with a recommendation of a lobbying representative(s) and approval of a contract in November. 96 " S t a t e U p d a t e W h i l e t h e L e g i s l a t u r e r e t u r n e d t o w o n n o n - t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i t e m s s u c h r e d i s t r i c t i n g , t e r m l i m i t s , t h e t r e a t b e t w e e n R e p u b l i c a n s a n d D e m o c r a t s . r k o n A u g u s t 7 , m u c h o f t h e f o c u s h a s b e e n a s L o s A n g e l e s U n i f i e d S c h o o l D i s t r i c t , e n t o f p e t s a n d t h e a n n u a l s o f t b a l l g a m e O f c o u r s e t h e o t h e r m a j o r i t e m o f i n e r e s t i s N o v e m b e r ' s e l e c t i o n w h i c h f e a t u r e s a c r o w d e d b a l l o t f u l l o f c o n t e n t i o s p r o p o s i t i o n s . O f k e e n i n t e r e s t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a r e P r o p o s i t i o n s 1 A a d 1 B . T h e C o m m i s s i o n r e c e i v e d a b r i e f i n g , r e g a r d i n g t h e G o v e r n o r ' s i n f r a s t r u c t r e b o n d p r o p o s a l f r o m M a r k W a t t s o f S m i t h W a t t s i n J u n e . P r o p o s i t i o n 1 A P r o v i d e s t h e P r o p o i t i o n 4 2 " f i x " P r o p o s i t i o n 1 A w o u l d p r o v i d e t h e m a p p r o v e d b y s t a t e v o t e r s i n 2 0 0 r e v e n u e f r o m t h e s a l e o f g a s o l i n e t o f u n d , b u t i t p r o v i d e s a n o p p o r t u n s u s p e n d t h e t r a n s f e r i n e c o n o m i c m u c h h a r d e r t o s u s p e n d P r o p o s i t i o c o n s i d e r e d a s l o a n s w i t h s t r i n g e n t t h e C o m m i s s i o n t a k e a p u b l i c , S U P c o n s i s t e n t w i t h p r e v i o u s C o m m i s s i o t r a n s p o r t a t i o n - o r i e n t e d a n d w o u l d s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f u n d i n g . P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B - - $ 1 9 . 9 B i l l i o n T r a n s P r o p o s i t i o n 1 6 i s a m a j o r p a r t o f t w i l l p r o v i d e $ 1 9 . 9 b i l l i o n f o r a v a r i b r o k e n d o w n i n t h e f o l l o w i n g c a t e g o " $ 4 . 5 b i l l i o n f o r c o r r i d o r m o b i T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ( C " $ 4 b i l l i o n f o r t r a n s i t c a p i t a l , a n d $ 4 0 0 m i l l i o n i n i n t e r c i t y r " $ 2 b i l l i o n t o s u p p l e m e n t t h e S " $ 3 b i l l i o n f o r g o o d s m o v e m e n w h i c h $ 1 b i l l i o n i s r e s e r v e d f C T C ; " $ 1 b i l l i o n i n s t a t e - l o c a l p a r t f u n d e d b y l o c a l s a l e s t a x m e a c h - a w a i t e d " f i x " t o P r o p o s i t i o n 4 2 w h i c h w a s . T h e c u r r e n t p r o p o s i t i o n d i r e c t s s a l e s t a x ' r a n s p o r t a t i o n p u r p o s e s r a t h e r t h a n t h e g e n e r a l t y f o r t h e G o v e r n o r a n d t h e L e g i s l a t u r e t o m e r g e n c i e s . P r o p o s i t i o n 1 A w o u l d m a k e i t 4 2 a n d r e q u i r e t h a t d i v e r s i o n s o f f u n d s b e a y b a c k r e q u i r e m e n t s . S t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h a t O R T p o s i t i o n o n P r o p o s i t i o n 1 A b e c a u s e i t i s p o l i c y a c t i o n s o n P r o p o s i t i o n 4 2 , i s u n i q u e l y f e g u a r d t h e v o t e r ' s s t r o n g i n t e n t f o r a d d i t i o n a l o r t a t i o n B o n d M e a s u r e e G o v e r n o r ' s i n f r a s t r u c t u r e b o n d p a c k a g e a n d t y o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t s . T h e f u n d i n g i s i e s i t y i m p r o v e m e n t s , a l l o c a t e d b y t h e C a l i f o r n i a C ) ; i t h $ 3 . 6 b i l l i o n i n f l e x i b l e f u n d s t o a l l o p e r a t o r s i t f u n d s ; a t e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ; i n v e s t m e n t s o n r a i l a n d h i g h w a y s y s t e m s , o f r a i r q u a l i t y i m p r o v e m e n t s , a l l a l l o c a t e d b y t h e e r s h i p f u n d s ( w i t h e v e n m a t c h f o r p r o j e c t s u r e s ) ; " $ 2 b i l l i o n f o r c i t i e s a n d c o u n t i e s , d i v i d e d e q u a l l y ; " $ 1 b i l l i o n i n s a f e t y , s e c u r i t y a n d d i s a s t e r p r e p a r e d n e s s f u n d s ; " $ 1 b i l l i o n f o r S t a t e R o u t e 9 9 i n B a k e r s f i e l d ; " $ 7 5 0 m i l l i o n f o r t h e S t a t e H i g h w a y O p e r a t i o n a n d P r o t e c t i o n P r o g r a m ; " $ 2 5 0 m i l l i o n i n h i g h w a y - r a i l r o a d g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n f u n d s ( w i t h h u n d r e d s o f m i l l i o n s m o r e i n g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n p r o j e c t s p o t e n t i a l l y e l i g i b l e f r o m a s e p a r a t e t r a d e c o r r i d o r i m p r o v e m e n t a c c o u n t ) ; " $ 3 0 0 m i l l i o n f o r t r a n s i t - o r i e n t e d d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t s ; a n d " $ 1 0 0 m i l l i o n f o r p o r t s e c u r i t y . T h e s t a t e h a s a l r e a d y b e g u n w o r k t o d e t e r m i n e t h e c r i t e r i a t o b e u s e d i n e v a l u a t i n g p r o j e c t s f o r t h e s e v a r i o u s c a t e g o r i e s , a n d C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f h a s b e e n a c t i v e i n p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t h e s e d i s c u s s i o n s . W i t h a f o c u s o n a r e a s t h a t s u p p o r t h o u s i n g a n d j o b g r o w t h , R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y i s w e l l - p o s i t i o n e d t o c a p i t a l i z e o n t h i s p r o g r a m a n d s h o u l d a l s o c o m p e t e w e l l f o r g o o d s m o v e m e n t a n d r a i l c r o s s i n g p r o g r a m s . P r o p o s i t i o n 1 1 3 i s u n i q u e t o t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d c a n p o t e n t i a l l y p r o v i d e s i g n i f i c a n t f u n d i n g f o r n e e d e d p r o j e c t s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . H a v i n g t h e s t a t e p l a y a s t r o n g e r r o l e i n f u n d i n g t r a n s p o r t a t i o n h a s b e e n a s t a t e d p o l i c y g o a l o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r q u i t e s o m e t i m e . G i v e n t h i s b a c k g r o u n d , s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n t a k e a p u b l i c S U P P O R T p o s i t i o n f o r P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B . P r o p o s i t i o n s 1 C , 1 D & 1 E - H o u s i n g , S c h o o l s a n d F l o o d C o n t r o l W h i l e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m p r i s e s t h e l i o n ' s s h a r e o f t h e G o v e r n o r ' s i n f r a s t r u c t u r e b o n d p a c k a g e , t h r e e o t h e r p r o p o s i t i o n s a r e p a r t o f t h e o v e r a l l e f f o r t t o i n v e s t i n C a l i f o r n i a . P r o p o s i t i o n 1 C i s a $ 2 . 8 5 b i l l i o n b o n d m e a s u r e f o r h o u s i n g a n d e m e r g e n c y s h e l t e r , P r o p o s i t i o n 1 D i s a $ 1 0 . 4 b i l l i o n e d u c a t i o n a l f a c i l i t i e s b o n d m e a s u r e a n d P r o p o s i t i o n 1 E i s a $ 4 . 0 9 b i l l i o n b o n d m e a s u r e f o r f l o o d c o n t r o l f a c i l i t i e s . R e a s o n a b l e p e o p l e c a n a r g u e w h e t h e r i s s u i n g b o n d s i s t h e m o s t e f f i c i e n t w a y t o f i n a n c e p u b l i c w o r k s p r o j e c t s ; h o w e v e r , m o s t w i l l a g r e e t h a t C a l i f o r n i a h a s n e g l e c t e d t o i n v e s t i n n e e d e d p u b l i c w o r k s p r o j e c t s . S t i l l , g i v e n t h a t P r o p o s i t i o n 1 C , 1 D a n d 1 E d o n o t a d d r e s s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i s s u e s , s t a f f w o u l d r e c o m m e n d t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n n o t t a k e a p o s i t i o n o n t h e r e m a i n d e r o f t h e i n f r a s t r u c t u r e p a c k a g e . P r o p o s i t i o n 9 0 - E m i n e n t D o m a i n A t a r e c e n t C o m m i s s i o n B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e , a r e q u e s t w a s m a d e f r o m a C o m m i s s i o n e r t o a n a l y z e P r o p o s i t i o n 9 0 w h i c h w i l l p l a c e a d d e d r e s t r i c t i o n s o n t h e u s e o f e m i n e n t d o m a i n . 9 8 " I n J u n e 2 0 0 5 t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s S u p r e m e C o u r t a f f i r m e d i n t h e l a n d m a r k K e l o v . C i t y o f N e w L o n d o n , C T ( K e l o ) t h a t t h e p o w e r o f e m i n e n t d o m a i n c o u l d i n d e e d b e u s e d t o t r a n s f e r p r i v a t e l y o w n e d l a d f r o m o n e p r i v a t e o w n e r t o a n o t h e r f o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f e c o n o m i c d e v e l o p m e n t T h e C o u r t r u l e d t h a t t h e . p u b l i c b e n e f i t s o f e c o n o m i c g r o w t h a r e a c o n s t i t u t i o n a l l y p e r m i t t e d " p u b l i c u s e " t o j u s t i f y t h e t a k i n g o f p r i v a t e p r o p e r t y u n d e r t h e F i f t h A e n d m e n t . T h e K e l o d e c i s i o n m a d e h e a d l i n e s a d v o c a t e s h a r s h l y c r i t i c i z e d t h e H i e x p r e s s e d c o n c e r n o v e r t h e g o v e r n f o r p u r p o s e s w h e r e a p r i v a t e e n t i t y i b e n e f i t i s i n d i r e c t , a t b e s t . H o w e v s t a t e s t o t a k e u p t h e i s s u e . T m i l l i o n a i r e , p r o p e r t y r i g h t s i n t e r e s t i n i t i a t i v e t h a t h a s q u a l i f i e d f o r t h e N I f a p p r o v e d b y t h e v o t e r s , t h i s i n i t i l o c a l a g e n c i e s ' a b i l i t y t o u s e e m p r o j e c t s , i n c l u d i n g p r o j e c t s u n d e r c o A l s o k n o w n a s t h e " A n d e r s o n I n i t i a " P r o t e c t O u r H o m e s A c t " i s a S t a e f f e c t w i t h a s i m p l e m a j o r i t y a p p r o o f f i c i a l b a l l o t t i t l e g i v e n t o t h e i n i t i a A c q u i s i t i o n , R e g u l a t i o n o f P r i v a t e T h e i n i t i a t i v e i s s i m i l a r t o a p a i r o f c l e g i s l a t u r e l a s t y e a r w h i c h d i e d i n t h T h e i n i t i a t i v e l i m i t s t h e u s e o f e m i n r o a d c o n s t r u c t i o n , t h e c r e a t i o n o l a n g u a g e , g o v e r n m e n t s c a n n o t c o n d a p u b l i c u s e o n t h e g r o u n d s o f e c o p r i v a t e t o l l r o a d s a n d p r i v a t e l y - o w p u b l i c u s e s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , t h e i n i t i a t h e s t a t e d p u b l i c u s e ( e . g . , i f a c i t m a y b e u n a b l e t o u s e i t f o r o t h e r c a b l e ) . c r o s s t h e c o u n t r y a n d p r i v a t e p r o p e r t y r i g h t s h C o u r t ' s r u l i n g . D e t r a c t o r s o f t h e d e c i s i o n e n t ' s a b i l i t y t o c o n d e m n l a n d a n d t h e n , u s e i t m a k i n g a p r o f i t a n d t h e c o r r e l a t i o n t o a p u b l i c r , t h e C o u r t ' s o p i n i o n a l l o w e d o p p o r t u n i t y f o r r o u g h a n e f f o r t b a n k r o l l e d b y a N e w Y o r k i n C a l i f o r n i a h a v e r e s p o n d e d w i t h a b a l l o t v e m b e r e l e c t i o n . t i v e , w i l l h a v e m u l t i p l e s i g n i f i c a n t i m p a c t s o n n e n t d o m a i n a n d m a y a f f e c t , t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s t r u c t i o n o r c o m p l e t e d . i v e , " a f t e r o n e o f t h e i n i t i a t i v e ' s s p o n s o r s , t h e e C o n s t i t u t i o n a l A m e n d m e n t t h a t w i l l g o _ i n t o a l f r o m C a l i f o r n i a v o t e r s t h i s N o v e m b e r . T h e i v e b y t h e S e c r e t a r y o f S t a t e i s , " G o v e r n m e n t r o p e r t y . I n i t i a t i v e C o n s t i t u t i o n a l A m e n d m e n t . " n s t i t u t i o n a l a m e n d m e n t s p r o p o s e d i n t h e s t a t e i t o r i g i n a l c o m m i t t e e s . n t d o m a i n t o " p r o j e c t s o f p u b l i c u s e " s u c h a s p a r k s , a n d z o n i n g . U n d e r t h e i n i t i a t i v e ' s m n p r i v a t e l a n d f o r p r i v a t e u s e a n d t h e n c l a i m o m i c d e v e l o p m e n t o r t a x r e v e n u e : H o w e v e r , e d p r i s o n f a c i l i t i e s a r e m e n t i o n e d a s e l i g i b l e i v e r e q u i r e s t h a t t h e p r o p e r t y b e u s e d o n l y f o r a c q u i r e s p r o p e r t y f o r r o a d p u r p o s e s , t h e c i t y u n s t a t e d p u r p o s e s s u c h a s s e w e r , w a t e r , o r A n o t h e r i m p o r t a n t i m p a c t o f t h e n i t i a t i v e i s t h e i m m e d i a t e e f f e c t o n p e n d i n g e m i n e n t d o m a i n c o u r t c a s e s . T h e i n i t i a t i v e w i l l t a k e e f f e c t i n s t a n t l y u p o n v o t e r a p p r o v a l a n d w i l l a p p l y t o a l l e m i n e n t d o m a i n c a s e s t h a t h a v e n o t b e e n f u l l y a d j u d i c a t e d , w i t h t h e p o t e n t i a l c o n . e q u e n c e o f s e n d i n g m a n y c a s e s t o - r e t r i a l i n o r d e r t o c o m p l y w i t h t h e n e w l a w . T h e r e a r e a l s o v a g u e p r o v i s i o n s i n t h e i n i t i a t i v e that could render a vast majority of past court opinions and orders on eminent domain cases null and void. Further, the initiative allows property owners to request a jury to determine "whether the taking is actually for a public use," as opposed to today's practice of leaving such decisions to a judge. The initiative also makes changes to how property owners are 'compensated. Agencies will be required to give the property owner copies of all appraisals made on the property, including appraisals upon which offers were never made. Rather than valuing.property based on the current use of the property, the 'initiative calls for property would be valued according to the government's stated use- for the property if that use results in a higher value for the land. Generally speaking, the initiative adjusts valuation and just compensation laws to favor property owners more so than current statutes. The initiative contains many instances of vague language which, if passed by voters, could be open to a broad range of legal interpretations by the courts. Thus, it is difficult to assess the overall impact of this initiative until the results of the long line of anticipated litigation related to the imprecise, undefined clauses in the initiative are handed down by the courts. Overall, Proposition 90 creates a number of policy changes that could have a negative impact on the Commission's property purchases for transportation projects and mitigation. The impacts for local governments will be more severe especially for redevelopment agencies and communities that are updating general plans or adopting specific plans. That's why organizations such as the League of Cities and -the California State Association of Counties are organizing an opposition campaign to the initiative. Environmental organizations such as California League. of Conservation Voters have also come out against Proposition 90, because it would make it harder for agencies to buy land for conservation and mitigation purposes. In spite of the many technical and legal problems with Proposition 90, the political reaction to the issue of eminent domain is rather profound. While there is a building coalition against the initiative, opposition to eminent domain can be found across a wide spectrum. For example, Proposition 90 is supported by California Congresswoman Maxine Waters and State Senator Tom McClintock, who would ordinarily oppose each other 99% of the time on every major public policy issue. On Sunday, August 7, Parade Magazine which is inserted in almost every major Sunday newspaper in the country led, with a cover story titled, "Will the Government Take Your Home?" The possibility exists that Proposition 90 has the potential to be one of a:handful of initiatives that will be polarizing, controversial and a potential wedge issue in what 100 might be a bruising campaign. Al impact on the Commission, staff-ur position on the initiative and to co legal concerns prior to taking a posi and 1 B which are unique to transp range of public policy. At this time the issue back in October if directed hough Proposition 90 could have a negative es the Commission to pause prior to taking a sider public policy and political, practical and ion on Proposition 90. Unlike Propositions 1 A �rtation, Proposition 90 covers a much larger staff recommends no position but could bring o do so. 101 ADDITIONA INFORMATION TO AGEN A ITEM NO. 15 irec i6 s-- Uot g for Mobility e call them "freeways," but in fact, Californians pay for our highways in many ways —through fuel excise taxes, sales taxes on gasoline, and local sales taxes ded- icated to funding area transportation programs and projects. The truth is that for many years, the effectiveness of these various transportation funding sources has been diminishing in relation to Califomia's growing population and the increased commuter and commercial vehicle demand on our roads. The result is that we're short —by an astonishing $100 billion —on funds required to operate, maintain, and ex.<nd our transportation system for the next decade. WeSrwAYS rea ers know that, since 1992, the state's population has grown 16 per- cent and the nu u er of annual miles driven has grown 25 percent, but our trans- portation networ . has expanded barely 2 percent. At times, it seems that options no longer exist to sol e our congestion and associated traffic -safety problems. But there is hope and finall some leadership attempting to move us forward. In a bipartisan ffort, Govemor Schwarzenegger and the legislature agreed to place Propositions lA . d 1B on the November 7, 2006, ballot. Proposition 1A will assure that the sales tax a pay on gasoline is used only for transportation. In 2002, almost 70 percent of vo :rs passed Proposition 42, which dedicated the sales tax on gasoline to transportation. , adly, these funds were diverted during the budget crisis. Proposition IA fixes the loo.hole so those funds cannot easily be diverted in the future. Proposition lA w 11 ensure what 70 percent of voters have already approved. Proposition 1 : , perhaps not as straightforward as Proposition 1A, will enable the state to issue $20 pillion in bonds to build and repair roads and transit systems. Critics say we shouldn't o . s debt on to future generations, but they are short on any practical strategies to fix o growing transportation problems. The Auto Club, too, is concemed about passing de t on to future generations. However, we are also concerned about passing a dilapited and nonfunctioning transportation system and a poorer quality of life on to futur generations. We need Proposition 1B. Propositions 1 and 1B won't solve all of our congestion problems, nor do they offer a perfect solutio to address decades of neglect and underinvestment in one of the state's most vital and important resources. But they will provide a reliable funding base for meeting n ur many transportation needs. Your support for these measures will also reinforce the essage to elected officials that mobility remains among the state's highest public po icy priorities. The Auto Clu supports Propositions lA and 1B and earnestly asks members to do the same. Cal fornia's transportation needs are vast. You can help make them a high priority by Ming "yes" on Propositions lA and 1B on November 7. Thomas V. cKeman President an CEO September/October 2006 Upfront 9 egislative Update Keeping t Inland E e pire Moving Propositions 1 A and 1 B w II go a long way toward improving the state's tran •portation systems magine that you live in an old but beautiful house in the inland Empire that's too small for your family, yet you want to stay there. Do you (a) buy bunk beds and develop a reservation system for the bathroom, (b) tell your kids you have seniority and ask them to move out, or (c) modernize and expand your home, which you can't really afford to do? Califonua—and the Inland Empire — is much like that house. Most of our roads, schools, reservoirs, levees, and other public facilities were built decades ago when our population was much smaller. Since that time, however, we haven't invested enough in our infra- structure. Furthermore, California's pop- ulation has grown from about 16 million in the 1960s to more than 36 million today, and it's likely to be more than 42 million by 2020. To extend our domestic metaphor, the house's roof is missing shingles, the pipes leak, the windows are broken, the furnace needs to be replaced, and the place is just too darn crowded. Our transportation systems reflect this underinvestment. For example, road capacity has increased only 2 percent since 1992, even though our population has increased 16 percent and miles driven per year has increased 25 percent. As a result, typical Inland Empire commuters spend more than 55 hours a year stuck in rush-hour traffic, costing them more than $950 in wasted time and fuel. 16 Upfront � Tennessee Street elf -Help oters in Riverside County (2002) and an Bernardino County (2004) took i portant steps to increase investments i transportation when they extended t eir respective one-half cent trans - nation sales taxes. During the next 3 years, the renewed sales tax revenue ill provide a combined $10.8 billion f r P t r highway, local road, and transit provements. The new Measure A program will ovide dollars for the continued idening of almost every freeway in Riverside County, including Inters 15, Interstate 215, and State Routes 71, 86, and 91. It will also return millio of dollars to cities and the county for ro maintenance and transit. The Measur program in San Bernardino County w be used for freeways, interchange Metrolink expansion, public transi synchronized traffic signals, local street repairs, and other improvements. Now the bad news. Inland Empire' transportation projects also depend on state transportation funds, which. have been woefully short of what we September/October 200E- need by the state's own estimate, a shortfall of up to $10 billion a year throughout California. The good news is that voters have a chance to narrow the funding gap by weighing in on two ballot measures — Propositions 1A and 1B—in the November 7, 2006, election. These measures were placed on the ballot because what they propose —a change to the state constitution and a request forigeneral-obligationbonds—requires voter approval. The governor and state legislature can't make these decisions by themselves. Keeping Faith with the Voters Proposition 1 A would restore the intent of Proposition 42, which California voters approved in 2002. The measure dedicated the state's existing sales tax on gasoline well over $1 billion a year to highways, local road maintenance, and public transit. However, Proposition 42 contains a loophole that allows the governor and legislature to divert some or all of the money to the state's i General Fund. Since Proposition 42 was approved, about $2.5 billion that should have gone to our roads and public transit has been taken or borrowed. Commendably, the governor and legislature kept transportation funds in the current budget, but there's no guarantee they'll continue to do so. Duri g the next 30 years, the renewed sales tax revenue will •rovide a combined $10.8 billion fo highway, local road, and transit im. rovements. Voters h this money year —will because Pri harder to di The state ci ve a chance to ensure that now about $1.3 billion a be used for transportation position lA would make it ert the money to other uses. uld still borrow this money in times of economic emergency, but the loans ould have to be repaid within three years, with interest. Each loan wont have to be repaid before another is ]lowed, and no more than two loans ould be made within any 10-year pe od. Buildin; for the Future Propositi n 18 is one of four bond measures ( long with 1C, 1D, and 1E) on the No ember 7 ballot that would make $37.3 '.illion available for key areas of the state', ailing infrastructure. Proposition 113 would dedicate almost $20 billion or road repairs, congestion. reduction, b .dge repair, expanded public transit, and port security. Statewide, it would prow de: $8.6 bit lion for roads, including highway i nprovement and expansion, local stre:t and road improvement The Auto Club says "yes and maintenance, highway safety, highway -railroad crossings, and seismic upgrades to local bridges. $5 billion for rail and bus projects and transit security. $3.1 billion to improve movement of goods, including highway and freight rail upgrades and port -related air quality and security improvements. $3.2 billion for a variety of other transportation purposes, including the backlogged state transportation improvement program. The program funds highway and transit projects, and it supplies matching funds for counties, such as Riverside and San Bernardino, that provide their own transportation funding through local sales taxes. More important, the approval of Proposition 1B would guarantee that the Inland Empire receives a minimum of $587 million for road repairs, freeway widening, and transit improvements. The region would also have several opportu- nities to secure additional dollars for other key projects, such as expanding freeway lanes in Riverside or widening I-215 in San Bemardino. W on lA and 1B The Auto Club supports Propositions 1A and 1B and rges voters to vote yes on them on November 7. Together, hese measures would provide about $33 billion for the state's rans- portation needs over the next 10 years. This won't solve all our transportation -related prob ems, but it will make a significant contribution toward ke ping California moving —without a tax increase and within pr dent debt limits. Proposition lA is especially crucial because it ensures .t the 8113 billion -plus that Californians pay every year in ga oline sales tax would be used to relieve traffic congestio and improve our roadways; at the same time, it would enab a the September/October 2006 governor and legislature to borrow these funds on a limited basis when necessary to get the state through economic hard times. Proposition 1B would allow the state to borrow re- sponsibly to build critical transportation projects to meet Cali- fornia's future needs. It would also allow Riverside and San Bemardino counties to expedite regional infrastructure projects, add more transit services, and repair roads at a faster rate. As of this writing, Propositions lA and 1B both appear to have widespread support and little organized opposition. You can learn more about these measures at www.yesonl aand l b.com. And please remember to vote on November 7. Upfront 17