HomeMy Public PortalAbout12 December 18, 2006 Technical Advisory"
"
T I M E :
D A T E :
L O C A T I O N :
7 8 8 8 6
T E C H N I C A L A D V I S O R Y C O M M I T T E E M E E T I N G
M E E T I N G A G E N D A *
9 : 3 0 A . M .
D e c e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 0 6
B a n n i n g C i t y H a l l C i v i c C e n t e r
L a r g e C o n f e r e n c e R o o m
9 9 E a s t R a m s e y S t r e e t
B a n n i n g , C A
* B y r e q u e s t , a g e n d a a n d m i n u t e s m a y b e a v a i l a b l e i n a l t e r n a t i v e f o r m a t ; i . e . l a r g e p r i n t , t a p e .
C O M M I T T E E M E M B E R S
A h m a d A n s a r i , C i t y o f P e r r i s
D a v e B a r a k i a n , C i t y o f P a l m S p r i n g s
B i l l B a y n e , C i t y o f C a t h e d r a l C i t y
T o m B o y d , C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
D u a n e B u r k , C i t y o f B a n n i n g
B i l l G a l l e g o s , C i t y o f C o a c h e l l a
M i k e G o w , C i t y o f H e m e t
M a r k G r e e n w o o d , C i t y o f P a l m D e s e r t
B r u c e H a r r y , C i t y o f R a n c h o M i r a g e
B i l l H u g h e s , C i t y o f T e m e c u l a
G e o r g e J o h n s o n , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
T i m J o n a s s o n , C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a
J i m K i n l e y , C i t y o f M u r r i e t a
E u n i c e L o v i , S u n L i n e T r a n s i t
A m i r M o d a r r e s s i , C i t y o f I n d i o
H a b i b M o t l a g h , C i t i e s o f C a n y o n
L a k e , ( P e r r i s ) a n d S a n J a c i n t o
L e s N e l s o n , P V V T A
D a n P a t n e a u d e , C i t y o f D e s e r t H o t S p r i n g s
J u a n P e r e z , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
A m a d Q a t t a n , C i t y o f C o r o n a
J i m R o d k e y , C i t y o f B l y t h e
A n n e S c h n e i d e r , C i t y o f C a l i m e s a
K e n S e u m a l o , C i t y o f L a k e E l s i n o r e
M a r k S t a n l e y , R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y
R u t h a n n e T a y l o r B e r g e r , W R C O G
B i l l T h o m p s o n , C i t y o f N o r c o
C h r i s V o g t , C i t y o f M o r e n o V a l l e y
A l l y n W a g g l e , C V A G
T i m W a s s i l , C i t y o f I n d i a n W e l l s
J o h n W i l d e r , C i t y o f B e a u m o n t
S e a n Y e u n g , C a ! t r a n s D i s t r i c t 8
A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
1 1 . 3 6 . 1 0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda.
TIME: 9:30 A.M.
DATE: December 18, 2006
LOCATION: Banning City Hall Civic Center
Large Conference Room
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, CA
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and government Code Section 54954.2, if
you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact Riverside County
Transportation Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting
time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility
at the meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. SELF -INTRODUCTIONS
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda.
Comments relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is
before the Committee.)
5. WORK EFFORT OF 10 YEAR DELIVERY PLAN FOR WESTERN RIVERSIDE
COUNTY MEASURE A FREEWAY PROGRAM (Attachment)
6. 10 YEAR MEASURE A WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY HIGHWAY
PROGRAM PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS/CMIA RECOMMENDATIONS
(Attachment)
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
December 18, 2006
Page 2
7. PROPOSITION 1B (AB1266) LOCAL STREETS AND ROAD IMPROVEMENT,
CONGESTION RELIEF, AND TRAFFIC SAFETY. ACCOUNT OF 2006
SUMMARY (Attachment)
8. 2006 STIP AUGMENTATION (Verbal Presentation)'
9. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
10. ADJOURNMENT (The next meeting will be January 8, 2007, 10:00; A.M. in
Riverside.)
" M I N U T E S
i
"
T E C H N I C A L A D V I S O R Y C O M M I T T E E M E E T I N G
M I N U T E S
M o n d a y , N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 0 6
1 . C a l l t o O r d e r
T o m B o y d , C h a i r , c a l l e d t h e m e e t i n g o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
C o m m i s s i o n ( R C T C ) T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e ( T A C ) t o o r d e r a t 1 0 : 0 0
A . M . a t t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n , 4 0 8 0 L e m o n
S t r e e t , R i v e r s i d e , C A .
2 . S e l f - I n t r o d u c t i o n s
M e m b e r s P r e s e n t :
O t h e r s P r e s e n t :
D a v e B a r a k i a n , C i t y o f P a l m S p r i n g s
B i l l B a y n e , C i t y o f C a t h e d r a l C i t y
T o m B o y d , C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
P a t t i C a s t i l l o , C i t y o f H e m e t
T i m J o n a s s o n , C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a
E u n i c e L o v i , S u n L i n e T r a n s i t
A m i r M o d a r r e s s i , C i t y o f I n d i o
H a b i b M o t l a g h , C i t i e s o f C a n y o n L a k e ,
( P e r r i s ) a n d S a n J a c i n t o
R u s s N a p i e r , . C i t y o f M u r r i e t a
C r a i g N e u s t a e d t e r , C i t y o f M o r e n o V a l l e y
J u a n P e r e z , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
A m a d Q a t t a n , C i t y o f C o r o n a
K e n S e u m a l o , C i t y o f L a k e . E l s i n o r e
A l a n a T o w n s e n d , C i t y o f P a l m D e s e r t
T i m W a s s i l , C i t y o f I n d i a n W e l l s
J o h n W i l d e r , C i t y o f B e a u m o n t
S e a n Y e u n g , C a ! t r a n s
M a r l i n F e e n s t r a , R C T C
S h i r l e y G o o d i n g , R C T C
A a r o n H a k e , R C T C
E r i c H a l e y , R C T C
K e n . L o b e c k , R C T C
S h i r l e y M e d i n a , R C T C
P a u l R o d r i g u e z , U r b a n C r o s s r o a d s
E d d a R o s s o , R C T C
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 20, 2006
Page 2
3. Approval of Minutes
Sean Yeung, Ca!trans Local Assistance, requested a change in the minutes
to reflect that thefirst word in line 6 of agenda item 8c should be qualitative
in reference to a PM 2.5. Qualitative Analysis.'
4. Public Comments
There were no public. comments.
5. RTIP UPDATE
Ken Lobeck, RCTC, indicated that federal agencies approved the 2006 RTIP
on October 2, 2006 without special conditions except for ,i a minor
'requirement to update ,the State Highway Operation_ and Protection Program
(SHOPP) that will become the: first amendment to the 2006 RTIP. The first
regular amendment will then proceed as Amendment 02. Both amendments
have now ; been submitted to SCAG for review and processing. Riverside
County's submission as part of Amendment 02 exceeded 100 projects.
Ken added that a copy of the RTIP approval letter is included with the
agenda,: item and highlighted paragraph #5 -for the TAC that states, "Any
project or project`' phase, listed in a MPO ;FTIP,;that is not included in the
MPO's Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is, not approved for inclusion in the
2007 FSTIP".; He clarified that this means, SCAG will be held to a RTP
consistency ;check when the project, is submitted for RTIP inclusion. if .not in
the RTP, then the project can't be added,to the RTIP.
Shirley Medina, RCTC, said, that the agencies, could review the '2006 RTIP
and the current 2004 RTP. on SCAG's website www.scag.ca.gov.
1n response to a question ,'concerning the length of time to process and
approve RTIP amendments, Ken agreed that ,the RTIP process has become
weighed down with excessive review requirements by FHWA which has
slowed amendment :approvals. He cited that ,the formal amendment portion
to Amendment 02 most likely will not receive? approval until mid to late
March 2007.
Eunice Lovi,''SunLine asked for further, clarification about the process to add
a new transit project with a federal earmark to the RTIP. ;Ken clarified that
approved federally funded projects identified in the FY ;'07 Short Range
Transit Plan (SRTP) in FY 06/07 and FY 07/08 were included as part of
"
T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e M e e t i n g
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 0 6
P a g e 3
A m e n d m e n t 0 2 . H o w e v e r , i f t h e p r o j e c t i s n o t y e t p a r t o f t h e ' a p p r o v e d
S R T P , t h e n a n a m e n d m e n t t o : t h e S R T P m u s t f i r s t o c c u r . T h e . p r o j e c t t h e n
c a n b e a d d e d t o t h e , R T I P t h r o u g h t h e n e x t a v a i l a b l e R T I P a m e n d m e n t .
6 . T R A N S P O R T A T I O N B O N D - N E X T S T E P S
E r i c H a l e y , R C T C . E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r , p r o v i d e d a r e v i e w P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B ' s
p a s s a g e a n d w h a t i t m a y m e a n t o R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . H e e x p l a i n e d t h a t a
L o c a l S t r e e t s : a n d R o a d s I m p r o v e m e n t c o m p o n e n t i s i n c l u d e d a n d c o n t a i n s
a n e s t i m a t e d t o t a l f u n d i n g o f $ 2 b i l l i o n . T h e f u n d s w i l l b e a l l o c a t e d d i r e c t l y
t o t h e c i t i e s b a s e d o n a p o p u l a t i o n f o r m u l a . T h e m i n i m u m a l l o c a t i o n t o a c i t y
w i l l b e a t l e a s t . $ 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 . M r . H a l e y , s t a t e d t h a t c u r r e n t l y n o o n e i s s u r e
w h e n t h e f u n d s w i l l b e g i n f l o w i n g t o t h e c i t i e s a n d s o m e d e t a i l s w i t h t h e
f u n d i n g p r o g r a m n e e d t o b e r e s o l v e d b e f o r e t h e c i t i e s w i l l s e e t h e f u n d s .
A d i s c r e t i o n a r y f u n d i n g c a t e g o r y a l s o e x i s t s a n d t o t a l s $ 7 . 5 t o $ 8 b i l l i o n o f
w h i c h $ 4 . 5 b i l l i o n w i l l b e f o r c o n g e s t i o n r e l i e f p r o j e c t s a s p a r t o f t h e C o r r i d o r
M o b i l i t y I m p r o v e m e n t A c c o u n t ( C M I A ) . M r . H a l e y a d d e d t h a t c o u n t i e s w i l l b e
c o m p e t i n g a g a i n s t e a c h o t h e r a l o n g w i t h C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t s . P r e s e n t l y , t h e
R C T C B o a r d h a s a p p r o v e d s t a f f t o f o c u s o n t h r e e s p e c i f i c r o u t e s , w h i c h
i n c l u d e 1 - 1 5 , S R 9 1 , a n d 1 - 2 1 5 .
M r . H a l e y e x p l a i n e d t h a t t h e , p r o j e c t s e l e c t i o n g u i d a n c e c o m p l i c a t e s a n d
n a r r o w s t h e p o s s i b l e p r o j e c t s e l e c t i o n s . H e c i t e d t h a t o n e p r o v i s i o n r e q u i r e s
t h a t t h e p r o j e c t m u s t b e u n d e r c o n s t r u c t i o n b y 2 0 1 2 . H e s t a t e d t h a t t h i s o n e
r e q u i r e m e n t e l i m i n a t e s c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f n u m e r o u s p r o j e c t s , t h a t w o u l d h a v e
c o m p e t e d w e l l , b u t w i l l n o t b e i n c l u d e d b e c a u s e t h e y w i l l n o t b e u n d e r
c o n s t r u c t i o n b y 2 0 1 2 . M r . H a l e y c o n c l u d e d t h a t t h e e n t i r e e f f o r t i s b e i n g
f a s t - t r a c k e d b y C T C a n d . R C T C ' s s u b m i s s i o n m u s t b e r e a d y f o r B o a r d
a p p r o v a l b y t h e D e c e m b e r 1 3 , 2 0 0 6 m e e t i n g .
S h i r l e y M e d i n a a d d e d t h a t b e c a u s e o f t h e p a s s a g e o f P r o p o s i t i o n 1 1 3 , a 2 0 0 7
S t a t e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( S T I P ) : A u g m e n t a t i o n w o u l d n o w
o c c u r t h a t w o u l d p r o v i d e $ 1 b i l l i o n . P r o j e c t s u b m i s s i o n s t o C T C w i l l b e d u e
b y A p r i l 2 0 0 7 . S h e i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e C o u n t y ' s R e g i o n a l I m p r o v e m e n t
P r o g r a m ( R I P ) s h a r e c o u l d b e a b o u t $ 1 0 0 m i l l i o n . L i k e t h e C M I A , t h e 2 0 0 7
S T I P A u g m e n t a t i o n w i l l _ b e f a s t - t r a c k b y C T C . S p e c i f i c p r o j e c t s h a v e n o t
b e e n i d e n t i f i e d f o r f u n d i n g y e t , b u t o n e i d e a c o u l d b e t o u s e t h e S T I P
A u g m e n t a t i o n t o p r o g r a m S T I P a u g m e n t a t i o n f u n d s b a c k i n t o p r o j e c t s t h a t
l o s t S T I P f u n d i n g i n t h e 2 0 0 6 S T I P U p d a t e .
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 20, 2006
Page 4
Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs, inquired if projects with delayed STIP
funds would possibly now be accelerated. Shirley responded that because of
the intracounty formula, CVAG would make this determination.
7. HBRR GROUP PROJECT FUNDING INDIVIDUAL. PROJECT LISTS
Ken _ Lobeck' provided TAC members with individual project lists', awarded
funding in the '2006/07 :Highway Bridge Program (HBRR). The individual
project lists are now available on the Caltrans Local Assistance ;website. A
website guide to help agencies find the' project lists was included with
agenda item.
Ken explained that previous guidance from 'Caltrans HQ to program; all HBRR
in the construction phase was incorrect. All.'$3.358 million; approved for FY
06/07 should have been programmed in the Preliminary Engineering phase in
the RTIP. This will be corrected in the RTIP through the next available
amendment.. Until then, project HBRR obligations in PE wall not; be able to
proceed.
Ken added that several projects reflect HBRR for construction in :out -years
(FY 09/10, and beyond)_ If construction will occur in an earlier ;year, the
HBRR funds must be formally moved to the correct year. ,Shirley Medina,
RCTC, recommended that the agencies work very closely with' the new
engineer, Chris Igbinedion, who is handling HBRR to make 'sure construction
funds are programmed when needed.
8. FY 2006/07,OBLIGATION DELIVERY PLAN
A draft comprehensive FY 06/07 Obligation'' Plan reflecting' `proposed
obligations, for CMAQ, 'STPL, TE, and earmark funded projects was provided
to TAC members. Ken Lobeck explained that the August 2006 Milestone
Reports were used ' as the basis to develop; the FY 06/07 Obligation Plan.
Shirley Medina provided a FY 2006/07 proposed obligation List reflecting .only
the 1' and 2nd: quarters. She stated that the list does not include all the
projects that are the full list. The tailored list ;will be used for presentation
to Caltrans Headquarters and CTC'to meet 'the' AB 1012 iUse it or Lose' it
requirement: 'There is "a balance of about, $5 , million that will.' require an
extension. However, the extension will expire May 1, 2007. District will
work closely with;` the agencies regarding projects listed in quarters 1 and 2.
echnical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 20, 2006
Page 5
AB 1012 EXTENSION
Shirley Medina indicated that the AB 1012 Extension was covered in agenda
item 8.
10. LOCAL ASSISTANCE REPORT
Sean Yeung, Caltrans Local Assistance, did not have an update at this time.
11, PROJECT DELIVERY SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATE
Shirley Medina indicated that discussions with Paul Engstrom on the project
charter are continuing.- She pointed out that the agencies have received a
template. The . project charters are basically for highway projects, mostly
interchange projects, which will spell out the delivery schedule and other
milestones. The conflict resolution section would also describe if conflicts
emerge at Project Development Team Meetings (PDT) meetings and the
steps to elevate issues properly for a quick resolution. She pointed out that
the subcommittee also received a demonstration on the oversight tracking
database developed by District 8.
The subcommittee is working on an Excel spreadsheet that has key
information, e.g, submittals, what documents have been submitted, when
they were submitted and other important data that will be compiled on a
rnonthly basis. The data will be put on RCTC's website. She further stated
that Paul Blackwelder, RCTC, had made available to the TAC a draft of the
listing asking everyone to review the projects before the list is posted to
RCTC's website.
The TAC subcommittee is also discussing ways to obtain more support at
District 8, recognizing the staffing shortage and oversight projects and how
to raise the importance of the oversight projects. . Through the NEPA
delegation that should occur in April 2007, District 8 will get a. new staff
person to handle the workload._
The subcommittee will continue to meet with Caltrans concerning. right of
way issues and utility relocations. The next meeting will be in December or
early January 2007. The TAC will receive an updated report in January.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 20, 2006
Page 6
12. NOVEMBER 8, 2006 COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS
Eric Haley announced that the November 30 retreat has been cancelled. The
next Commission meeting will be December 13. : He also announced the
cancellation of the Budget & Implementation and Plans . &', 'Programs
Committee meetings.
There were discussions relating to the election, bond funding, timing and P3.
The 10: Year Delivery plan was also discussed. The CMIA i program and the
STIP were also discussed: '
The Private Financing/Delivery Plan Ad Hoc Committee Meeting is scheduled
for November 27 and is a preview to the December 13presentation and new
revenue estimates will be unveiled for Measure A followed by discussions of
the public/private partnership and the toll roads.
13. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
Ken Lobeck reported that SCAG has been working on the RTP `update and he
requested that SCAG provide a draft master .listing of all that has been
submitted. Once received, he will send it to the TAC for one last review.
Shirley Medina reminded TAC members not to wait until the schedule for the
next RTIP amendment is released, but to submit changes as, they occur.
The necessity of a December TAC meeting was raised and it was decided
that if there .are no substantive agenda items, staff: will notify the TAC that
the meeting has been cancelled.
14. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further` business for consideration by the Technical Advisory
Committee, the meeting adjourned at approximately 11:1.5• A.M.'The next
meeting is scheduled for December 18, 2006, .10:00 A.M:,i Banning City Hall
Civic Center, Large Conference Room, ,99. East Ramsey Street, Banning, CA.
Respectfully submitted,
Shirley Medina(`)
Program Manager
"
" A G E N D A I T E M 5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
December 18, 2006
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Ken Lobeck, Staff Analyst
THROUGH:
Shirley Medina
Program Manager
SUBJECT:
Work Effort of 10-Year Delivery Plan for Western Riverside County
Measure A Freeway Program
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the TAC to receive a copy of the RCTC Dec 13, 2006 agenda item
concerning the work effort of the 10-Year Delivery Plan for Western Riverside County
Measure A Freeway Program.
Attachment: Dec 13 RCTC Board Agenda Item: "Work Effort of 10 Year Plan for Western Riverside County
Measure A Freeway Program"
•
"
R I V E R S I D E . C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N I
i
D A T E : .
D e c e m b e r 1 3 , 2 0 0 6
T O :
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
F R O M :
P u b l i c / P r i v a t e F i n a n c i n g a n d D e l i v e r y P l a n A d H o c C o m m i t t e e
E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
W o r k E f f o r t o f 1 0 - Y e a r D e l i v e r y P l a n f o r W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y
M e a s u r e A F r e e w a y P r o g r a m
P U B L I C / P R I V A T E F I N A N C I N G A N D D E L I V E R Y P L A N A D H O C C O M M I T T E E A N D
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o :
1 ) R e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e w o r k e f f o r t t o " f o r m u l a t e t h e 1 0 - Y e a r
D e l i v e r y P l a n f o r t h e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y M e a s u r e A H i g h w a y
p r o g r a m ;
2 ) A p p r o v e t h e ' 1 0 - Y e a r W e s t e r n C o u n t y h i g h w a y p r i o r i t i e s , w h i c h
i n c l u d e t h e p r i o r i t i z a t i o n o f f r e e w a y : i n v e s t m e n t s o n p r o j e c t s a l o n g t h e
1 - 2 1 5 , 1 - 1 5 , S R - 9 1 a n d 1 - 1 0 c o r r i d o r s ;
3 ) A u t h o r i z e " s t a f f t o u t i l i z e t h e 2 0 0 6 f o r e c a s t o f M e a s u r e A r e v e n u e s i n
d e v e l o p i n g p r o j e c t i o n s f o r t h e 1 0 - Y e a r W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e ' C o u n t y
H i g h w a y D e l i v e r y P l a n ;
4 ) D i r e c t s t a f f t o r e t u r n t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n 9 0 d a y s w i t h " d e t a i l e d
u p d a t e s a n d r e p o r t s r e g a r d i n g t h e M i d C o u n t y P a r k w a y ( M C P ) p r o j e c t ,
t h e r e a l i g n m e n t o f S R - 7 9 , a n d t h e B i - C o u n t y 1 - 2 1 5 p r o j e c t ; a n d
5 ) R e t u r n t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i t h q u a r t e r l y u p d a t e s a n d a c t i o n s t o
f a c i l i t a t e a n d e x p e d i t e t h e d e l i v e r y o f h i g h w a y i m p r o v e m e n t s i n
W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
I n m i d - 2 0 0 5 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n d i r e c t e d s t a f f t o p u r s u e a t h r e e - p r o n g e d s t r a t e g y
a i m e d a t d e v e l o p i n g t h e n e c e s s a r y b a c k g r o u n d i n f o r m a t i o n t o i m p l e m e n t t h e f i r s t
1 0 y e a r s o f t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m , a p p r o v e d b y v o t e r s i n 2 0 0 2 . T h e
C o m m i s s i o n h a s a l r e a d y t a k e n a c t i o n o n s o m e M e a s u r e ' A p o l i c y a r e a s s u c h a s t h e
a c q u i s i t i o n o f h a b i t a t a r e a s f o r m i t i g a t i o n , o n g o i n g p l a n n i n g o n C o m m u n i t y a n d
E n v i r o n m e n t a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A c c e p t a b i l i t y P r o c e s s ( C E T A P ) c o r r i d o r s a n d t h e
i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f a T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F u n d ( T U M F ) p r o g r a m " f o r
W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y .
A g e n d a I t e m 9
2 0 9
However`, the one major policy area of the 2009 Measure. A program that required
a comprehensive background and data development effort is in the`area of highway
projects in Western Riverside County.
The Measure A expenditure .plan approved by voters in November 2002 :provides
funding for a wide .variety of local street and road" projects, 'regional arterials,
specialized'' transit and rail projects and commuter services.: The, voter approved
plan originally allocated $1.02 billion for improvements. to .state highways in
Western Riverside County, and specifically mentions that the Measure. A dollars
needed to cover the program would provide less than half of the needed money to
complete the ,projects`.' The drafting of the 2009 Measure expected ,state and
federal funding ,to be . used with measure dollars to finance the+ambitious plan.
Attachment 1 provides the detail that was included in the Measure,A plan,
A Changed Environment
The Measure A expenditure plan was approved' in 2002: and was actually
formulated by .the Commission throughout that year and 2001. The; projected
costs for individual projects were estimated in close consultation with the state of
_California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and represent an assessment of
cost projections, as they were known at that time.;
Shortly after Measure A was approved, construction costs for major projects have
skyrocketed along with the cost of real estate in Riverside County. After careful
study and 'consideration, Commission staff believes that the true 'cost of
implementing the state highway projects included in the Measure ek program now
exceeds $4.5 billion.
•
At the same time, Riverside County continues ;to lead most areas in .terms of
population and job growth, congestion levels ,and commute distances. `'While the
growth in population is helpful in terms of sales tax. revenue 'generation, growth
does bring added strain on the transportation system and the results can'; be seen .
on freeway corridors throughout Western Riverside County. Riverside, County's
residents and the overall economy are especially dependent on highways as the
backbone of its ;transportation system.
"Moving Parts
Given the :dynamic transportation environment of Western Riverside County, the
Commission directed staff to move. forward on three subject areas in order to lay
the groundwork' for developing. an implementation plan: strategy for the Measure A
state highway program and specifically the first 10 years of the program. The
updated data would then be used to develop a 10=Year Delivery Plan which is the
Agenda Item 9
210
subject of this staff report. The three subject areas which were often colloquially
referred to as "moving parts" have been completed by staff and include:
1. An updated Measure A revenue estimate;
2. The use of innovative financing techniques such as public/private
partnerships and toll roads; and
3. Updated scope, cost, traffic and data for the Measure A state highway
program. -
An ad hoc committee appointed by Chair Marion Ashley guided the data
development work that was conducted to advance these subject areas and
the Committee's membership was comprised of Commissioners Ashley,
Terry Henderson, Bob Buster, Frank Hall, Barbara Hanna, Robin Lowe,, Bob Magee,
Jeff Miller, Ron Roberts, John Tavaglione, Frank West and Roy Wilson. Caltrans
District 8 Director, Mike Perovich, also participated in the ad hoc meetings. The
result of this ad hoc committee's work guides the recommendations that are
reflected in this staff report and was reviewed .and unanimously forwarded to the
Commission at its most recent meeting on November 27, 2006.
Revised Measure A Revenue Estimate
During the development of the extension of Measure A for the November 2002
ballot, the Commission used a forecast completed, in May 2001 with the assistance
of Ernst & Young LLP. As a result of the significant economic growth in
Riverside County the past three fiscal years, that forecast was no longer useful for
budgeting and strategic planning purposes. In mid-2006, the forecast of
Measure A revenues through 2039 was completed by the UCLA Anderson
Forecast. Attachment 2 providesmore details on the forecasted amounts.
The new forecast of sales tax receipts for the 2009 Measure A, net of the 1.5%
State Board of Equalization fee, is approximately $10.354 billion compared to the
original forecast of $4.662 billion. These amounts are reflected in real dollars,
which are adjusted for inflation and represent the purchasing power of future
receipts in current year amounts. This represents a 122% increase in forecasted
sales tax receipts. Based on the forecast, staff has distributed the annual amounts
by geographic area based on the distribution used for Measure A allocations during
FY 2005/06. The following is a comparison of the forecasts by geographic area:
Geographic Area
2001 Forecast
2006 Forecast
Increase
Western County
$3,360,000,000
_$7,675,300,000
128.4%.
Coachella Valley
$1,255,000,000
$2,605,000,000
107.6%
Palo Verde Valley
$47,000,000
$73,300,000
56.0%
Total Receipts
$4,662,000,000
$10,353,600,000
122.1%
Agenda Item 9
211
Assuming proportionality for program allocations within each geographic area, the
new forecast results in approximately, , $486.2 million available for the
Western County highway program during the first ten years of the 2009 Measure A
and $2.330. billion for the 30-year period.
While the new projections indicate a healthy, growing economy, .Measure A will not
be sufficient to fund priority projects in the first ten years, of the 2009 Measure A
(FY 2010-2019). As originally projected in the Measure A expenditure plan, state
and federal funding will be needed and even then,; revenues will likely fall short.
One possibility to; close future gaps could :be a fee on new development': to build
freeway facilities and the Commission is beginning the secondphase of 'evaluating
that, approach. Other options could be through the utilization of user fees!'such as
tolls and securing ,one-time funding such as state bond dollars.
Innovative Financing Techniques Including Public/Private. Partnerships and, Tolls
At, its February 8, 2006;;meeting„ the Commission approved a list of pre -qualified
firms for On -Call Strategic Partnership Advisor Services. The assistance of °,experts,
knowledgeable .in the area of transportation economics, federaltransportation
funding tools and corporate equity investment evaluation, was critical in enabling
staff to independently evaluate the feasibility of public/private partnerships to build
additional transportation capacity or to speed the delivery of ,already ,planned
projects.
The idea of considering toll facilities in Riverside County is consistent with actions
that; are taking place .throughout the country. Indeed state and federal policy have
been moving in this direction with ,the idea of seeking private sector perticipation
for the funding ofinfrastructure projects that include hospitals; water facilities and
schools in addition to highways. The federal Safe, Accountable, Flexible, 'Efficient
Transportation Equity Act. (SAFETEA LU) ,legislation encourages the private sector
funding of highway improvements and _all'ovired the use of privately financed .toll
roads on interstate highways.
r
In ,California, the Legislature approved; AB ; 1,467 which allows for :four
privately financed''' transportation facilities throughout the state.,' Although" the
Governor and the Legislature trumpeted: the bill as an . example of innovative
thinking, the, provisions of':the .bill are so restrictive that: it is believed that,; additional
legislation will be needed in the next session to actually make implementation
possible. Nevertheless, it demonstrated :a willingness of the Legislature .and the
state to consider this type' of approach.
Agenda Item 9
Finally, toll ,roads of variouskinds have been constructedadjacent to
Riverside County in both San Diego and Orange Counties. The facilities have all
been unique in the way they were implemented but the success of the 1-15
managed lanes in San Diego County, the SR-241 and SR-261 .toll roads operated
by the Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) in Orange County and the
91 Express. Lanes have all shown that there is a market and. a .demand for the
public to pay for additional capacity through tolls if it provides an attractive
alternative to the congestion on conventional highways.
All three of the above -mentioned toll facilities were implemented and, are operated
and managed in different ways. Furthermore, there is a wide variety of financing
this type of development which is why consultants were retained to examine toll
financing alternatives. The result was an exhaustive nine -month study of both
publicly and privately financed delivery methods and then the application of these
methods to actual corridors in Western Riverside County.
In a best case scenario, toll roads offer the promise of providing additional
transportation capacity that can .be financed through their own 'revenue stream.
With the use of design -build contracting, theconstruction of this type of project
could also be expedited resulting in benefits being delivered quicker. Also if
demand is sufficient, excess revenue, from the facility could be invested in
additional projects in the same corridor. The allure of working with the private
sector is that more of the risks of constructing this type of project can be borne by
the private company because of the private sector's needto generate profits as
quickly as possible.
The best case scenario is predicated on strong user demand to entice the private
sector to participate. Early on in the analysis of actual corridors, it became clear
that toll roads and private sector participation would only pencil out on heavily -
trafficked freeways such as SR-91 and 1-15. That's why these highways already
have toll facilities on them in adjacent counties. It also means that toll facilities will
not ,pencil out on corridors with lesser traffic volumes such as SR-79 and the
proposed MCP. .
Congestion is certainly a problem on SR-79 but the overall volume of traffic is not
sufficient to finance a highway that is expected to more than a billion dollars.
Also, while the need for a new east -west corridor as envisioned on the MCP is
undeniable, the needed traffic demand to see anywhere near a break even revenue
projection for a toll road is decades into the future. If toll roads are to be
considered as a near -term transportation strategy, the focus will have to be limited
to improvements on SR-91 and 1-15. .
Agenda Item 9
213
Updated Scope; Cost, Traffic and Data for. the Measure A State Highway:' Program
At its June 3 2005: Commission .workshop, staff was provided wit -I general
direction to develop the information necessary to assess the delivery status of the
1989 Measure AlWestern County Highway Program (including the "MCP), as well
as, develop' an:±objective set of project measurements, including;, state recognized
performance measures, to support the Commission in' establishing: priorities for the
first 10 years of the 30-year Measure A program.
At its December.14,. 2005 -meeting, the Commission (approved an amendment to
the Bechtel 'Infrastructure program management contract to assist the Commission
in determining the status and deliverability .of the 1989 Measure A• program and
developing the initial' 2009 Measure A program 10-Year Delivery Plan. The
objectivesof the effort were:
• An assessment of the status and challenges of completing the delivery
of. the Western ;.County highway program for the 1989:Measure;
• An objective based •assessment of the Western County portion of the
2009 'Measure A transportation program;
• Prioritization of the Western County 'program of projects; and
• Development of a delivery plan that will cover r the first
10 years of the 30-year extension of Measure A.
Staff and the Bechtel ,team have completed this analysis, which involved 'fupdating
project scopes, and developing quantitative and qualitative benefits of projects in
the Measure A state highway program. This required updated modeling ,and traffic .
projections that used:&horizon year of 2015.
The need to reevaluate the 'scopes of the , various` Measure ;Vk projects' was
necessary because of limited detail in the Measure and.,the' continued growth of the
county. Project scope, outlined on the ballot, in imost' cases only;jspecified that an
additional lane be added.'. The ballot did not specify if the additional lane would be
a high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane or a mixed flow (MF) lane'. ' Alsoi in most
cases the Measure did not consider_ ancillary. projects that are necessary to improve
the effectiveness for certain improvements. .
As an example; 'merely adding another lane to SR-91 will have;lirnited benefit near
the convergence,of I-1.5,and Main Street in Corona. '!:While the primary `cause of
congestion in the area is traffic volume, the impact :is exacerbated.through°,a variety
of traffic movements that ;take' place in a confined %area.' ' In less than ' a mile,
vehicles are entering SR-91 from both directions'" .-of 115 while others are
attempting .to either enter or exit ,the freeway • from Main Street. All ,;of these
Agenda Item 9
214
,
vehicle movements require lane changes and other traffic moves that further
complicate an already -congested situation. A good way of addressing this area
would be through the construction of a collector distributor road system that would
add lanes alongside the freeway to allow for ingress, egress, lane changes and
weaving off the mainline of the freeway which would improve traffic flow and
provide safety benefits. The problem is this type of system is not specifically
identified in the Measure A program. Similarly the connector between the
eastbound SR-91 and northbound SR-71 was seen as a simple enhancement of the
existing loop ramp that is already in place at that location. Given the congestion in
the area, what is really needed is a much larger fly -over _ structure that would
eliminate a hairpin turn and allow for more cars to transition between the
two freeways.
Yet another work effort that plays a role in defining project scopes and definitions
was the completion of project study reports (PSR) by Caltrans for the 1-15, 1-215
and SR-91 corridors. This effort began in 2004 and is required by the state before
a project can move forward. This preliminary level of engineering and project
assessment helps quantify project costs, needed right-of-way, assesses
environmental issues and determines additional engineering or construction
challenges.
Quantitative Analysis
By re-evaluating the scope of various projects, staff was able to model results for
the quantitative measures of effectiveness that included:
• Facility Number of Trips Served -Average Daily Traffic (ADT);
• Facility Daily Level of Service (LOS);
• Travel Time Savings;
• Vehicle Miles Traveled Savings;
• Distance Savings per Vehicle;
• Vehicle Hours Traveled;
• Value of Time Savings ($);
• Value of Distance Savings ($);
• Energy ConsumptionSavings;
• Air Pollutant Savings, and;
• Accident Reduction.
These results were used to develop a cost -benefit ratio for each of the
2009 Measure projects and project segments after the delivery costs for each
project were updated ,and compared to 2015 baseline data.
Agenda Item 9
215
Qualitative Analysis
In addition to the cost -benefit ratios, the ,projects were compared using a list of .
qualitative.rneasures. These measures were used to attempt to assess issues that
are not easy to provide a •quantitative benefit. The qualitative measures focused on
factors such as:
•, Opportunistic Timing;
• Environmental Challenges;
• Need to Protect Right -of -Way;
• External funding available that is project specific;
• Time required to get the project ready to advertise, and;
Safety issues not addressed in the cost benefit analysis:
The details from the comprehensive analyses are voluminous to i:the point that it
could require .months of meetings to fully report all of the information. In fact, that
did happen with the ad hoc committee that oversaw the effort. However,, in sifting
through all of the information, there are a number of conclusions or assumptions
that can be gleaned that ,provide the basis for: formulating a delivery plan. They
include the following:
Increased Project Costs
This is a statewide, and even a national problem . but the situation in
Riverside County is especially acute given increases in property value and the need
to expand the scope of some of the Measure A projects. A funding gap exists and
there needs to be':a realization that Measure A is a 30-year program. Priorities need
to be established and some improvements will have to be made before others. The
quantitative benefit -cost analysis .provides helpful data to evaluate some of these
decisions.
A Need to Act Quickly
While the renewed Measure A program does not officially begin until July 2009,
Riverside County's residents` and its economy require immediateaction to address
current traffic conditions. Furthermore there are potential funding opportunities
thanks to the approval of Proposition 1 B. There are advantages` to keying in on
projects that can be delivered quickly. Usually these are,projectsthat require less.
right-of-way or that can be cleared environmentally with, little complication. Finally,
Riverside County: is home to a number ,of freeway corridors that are 'essentially
failing.
Agenda item 9
216
"
U s i n g t h e s e p a r a m e t e r s a s a g u i d e , f o u r h i g h w a y c o r r i d o r s a r e i d e a l l y s i t u a t e d a s
a p p r o p r i a t e p r i o r i t i e s f o r . t h e f i r s t 1 0 y e a r s o f i n v e s t m e n t f o r t h e f i r s t 1 0 y e a r s o f
t h e M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m . T h e c o r r i d o r s a r e :
" 1 - 2 1 5
" 1 - 1 5
" 1 - 1 0
" S R - 9 1
S t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h a t a p r i o r i t y f o c u s b e p l a c e d o n t h e s e h i g h w a y c o r r i d o r s f o r
t h e l i o n ' s s h a r e o f M e a s u r e A , a n d s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l f u n d i n g , a s w e l l a s t o p u r s u e
a d d i t i o n a l f o r m s o f f u n d i n g i n c l u d i n g t o l l s . T h e d e t a i l s o f t h e s e . p r o j e c t s a r e o u t l i n e d
i n t h e s u b s e q u e n t s t a f f r e p o r t :
S t a f f a l s o r e c o m m e n d s . t h a t w h i l e t h e m a j o r i t y o f i n v e s t m e n t m u s t c o n t i n u e o n
t h e s e c o r r i d o r s , w o r k m u s t s t i l l c o n t i n u e o n l o n g e r - t e r m p r i o r i t i e s i n c l u d i n g t h e
d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e M C P , t h e w i d e n i n g o f 1 - 2 1 5 t o S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y a n d
t h e r e a l i g n m e n t o f S R - 7 9 a s w e l l a s i m p r o v e m e n t s i d e n t i f i e d . i n t h e
R i v e r s i d e - O r a n g e C o u n t y M a j o r I n v e s t m e n t S t u d y ( M I S ) t h a t c a l l e d f o r t h e
c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a n e l e v a t e d e x p r e s s w a y f a c i l i t y a l o n g S R - 9 1 a n d a n e w . c o r r i d o r
b e t w e e n C o r o n a a n d " I r v i n e t h a t c o u l d r e q u i r e a t u n n e l t h r o u g h t h e C l e v e l a n d
N a t i o n a l F o r e s t . U n f o r t u n a t e l y , t h e s e p r o j e c t s f a i l t o m e e t t h e t e s t o f e a r l y
i m p l e m e n t a t i o n . P l a n n i n g a n d s t u d y i n g f u t u r e o p p o r t u n i t i e s r e m a i n s a n i m p o r t a n t
f u n c t i o n o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n , b u t i m m e d i a t e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f i m p r o v e m e n t s o n
a l r e a d y i m p a c t e d c o r r i d o r s m u s t t a k e p r e c e d e n c e . F o r t h a t r e a s o n , i t i s
r e c o m m e n d e d t h a t p l a n n i n g a c t i v i t i e s c o n t i n u e o n t h e s e p r o j e c t s a n d t h a t f u n d s b e
a l l o c a t e d f o r o n g o i n g e n v i r o n m e n t a l c l e a r a n c e s a n d t h e p r o t e c t i o n o f r i g h t - o f - w a y ,
t o a l l o w f u t u r e c o n s t r u c t i o n a s f u n d i n g b e c o m e s a v a i l a b l e .
N e x t S t e p s
T h e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h i s r e p o r t p r e s e n t s o n l y t h e b e g i n n i n g o f w o r k t h a t w i l l c o m e
t o g e t h e r t o i m p l e m e n t t h e f i r s t 1 0 y e a r s o f t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A h i g h w a y p r o g r a m .
T h r o u g h t h e u s e o f i n n o v a t i v e f i n a n c i n g , a n d a g g r e s s i v e c o n s t r u c t i o n s c h e d u l i n g ,
t h e e f f o r t s e e k s t o i n t e n s i f y i n v e s t m e n t i n t h e a r e a s t h a t a r e m o s t c o n g e s t e d a n d
n e e d i m m e d i a t e r e l i e f .
D u r i n g t h e n e x t f e w m o n t h s , s t a f f w i l l c o n t i n u e t o r e t u r n t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i t h
a c t i o n i t e m s t o i m p l e m e n t t h e o v e r a l l p l a n . T h i s w i l l i n c l u d e c o n t r a c t s f o r
e n v i r o n m e n t a l c l e a r a n c e , e n g i n e e r i n g , r i g h t - o f - w a y a c q u i s i t i o n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n .
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ' s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n n e e d s a r e s i g n i f i c a n t a n d t h e c u r r e n t e n v i r o n m e n t
t h a t s e e s c o n s t r u c t i o n c r e w s . w o r k i n g o n v a r i o u s h i g h w a y s , s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s w i l l
c o n t i n u e a n d i n t e n s i f y w i t h t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h i s p l a n .
A g e n d a I t e m 9
2 1 7
Attachments:
1) State Highway Portion: of 2009 Measure A Expenditure Plan
2) Taxable Sales Revenues for Riverside County - UCLA Report.
Agenda Item 9
218
ATTACHMENT 1
STATE HIGHWAY PORTION OF 2009 MEASURE A EXPENDITURE PLAN
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
The Expenditure Plan Map illustrates the Western and Coachella Valley areas. The
Western County area includes the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon
Lake, Corona, Hemet, Lake .Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Riverside, Murrieta, Norco,
Perris, San Jacinto, and Temecula. It also includes the unincorporated communities
of Jurupa, Mira Loma, Menifee, Wildomar, and Sun City and other, more sparsely
populated areas, and the reservations of the Pechanga Band of Mission Indians, the
Soboba Band of Mission Indians, the Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians, the Ramona'
Band of Cahuilla Indians, and the Morongo Band of Indians.
1. STATE HIGHWAYS
Many more state highway improvement projects are needed to deal with
congestion and safety problems than existing state and federal revenues can
fund. Projected formula funds from these sources over the 30 years is
estimated to be $640 million and will fund less than 1/2 of the improvements
needed and identified in the Expenditure Plan, which are estimated to cost
$1.66 billion in current dollars. Measure A funds will supplement those
funding sources- by an estimated $1.02 billion andwill cover the remaining
costs estimated to accomplish these improvements.
The highway projects to be implemented with funding returned to the
Western County area by extending the Measure A program are as follows:
ROUTE
LIMITS
PROJECT
EST. COST
SR-91, SR-60,
1-15, & I-215
Reducing congestion on these
routes will require that new
transportation corridors are
constructed
See Section 2
•
SR-91
Pierce Street to Orange County
Line
Add 1 lane each direction
$ 161 million
SR-91/1-15
Interchange
Add new connector from 1-15
North to SR-91 West
$ 243 millon
SR-91/SR-71
Interchange
Improve Interchange
$ 26 million
SR-71
SR-91 to San Bernardino
County Line
Widen to 3 lanes each direction
$ 68 million
1-215
60/91/215 to San Bernardino
County Line
Add 2 lanes each direction
$ 231 million
ATTACHMENT 1
ROUTE
LIMITS
PROJECT
EST. `COST
1-215
Eucalyptus Ave to 1-15
Add 1 lane each direction
$ 210 million
1-15 '
SR-60 to San Diego County
Line
Add 1 lane each direction
$ 359 million
1-10
1 Sari Bernardino County Line to
Banning
Add eastbound i ;, truck climbing
lane
$75 million
1-10/SR-60- , ,.
. Interchange ; -
Construct new interchange. ,
J , •$ 129 million
SR-60
Badlands area, east of Moreno
Valley ,
Add truck climbing' lane
$ 26 million
SR-79
Ramona Expressway to
Domenigoni Parkway
Realign highway
$ 132 million
SUBTOTAL
Measure A Funding
State & Federal Formula Funds
$1.02 billion
$0.64 billion
TOTAL
- $1.66 billion
The Commission may add additional state highway , projects, should
additional Measure A revenue become available.
An estimated 5% of the total cost for these highway projects ($83 million)
will be used for environmental purposes to mitigate the, cumulative and
indirect impacts associated with construction; of, these projects.
"
U C L A A n d e r s o n F o r e c a s t ( M a y 2 0 0 6 )
F Y R e c e i p t s , n e t o f 1 . 5 % S B O E A d m i n F e e
F Y
1 9 8 9 M e a s u r e A R e c e i p t s :
F Y 0 6 / 0 7
F Y 0 7 / 0 8
F Y 0 8 / 0 9
T o t a l f o r l a s t 3 y e a r s - 1 9 8 9 M e a s u r e A
2 0 0 9 . M e a s u r e A R e c e i p t s : - '
F Y 0 9 1 1 0 :
F Y 1 0 1 1 ��1 "
F Y 1 1 l 1 Z
F Y 1 2 1 1 3 '
F Y 1 3 l 1 4 ,
F Y 1 4 N 5
F Y 1 5 1 1 6 , r
F Y 1 6 1 1 7
F Y 1 7 / 1 8 ,
F Y 1 8 / 9 9
S u l t 4 0 . 4 f i r s t 1 0
F Y 1 9 l 2 0
" F Y 2 1 1 2 2
F Y 2 2 Y 1 3 '
F Y 2 3 l 2 4 . . , ` ,
F Y 2 5 g 6 ! s
Y 2 6 1 2 7 t
F Y 2 7 1 2 � 3
F ` f 2 8 1 2 9 �� ,
S u b t o t a l - s e c o n d 1 0 y e a r s = .
F Y 2 9 f 3 U ' .
F Y a
F a (
F Y 5
F Y 3 '
F Y 3 8 / , 9 u l , ��.
S u b t 6 4 o a s ,
N o m i n a l
1 5 7 , 2 9 7 , 2 9 3
1 6 5 , 4 7 9 , 5 9 9
1 7 4 , 5 4 6 , 9 2 1
$ 4 9 7 , 3 2 3 , 8 1 3
% C h a n g e
1 8 5 ; 6 1 4 ; 6 4 9
1 9 8 7 1 0 ; 9 8 6 `
"
2 1 3 ; 2 J 6 , ��1 3
. 2 2 8 ; 3 7 4 8 3 1 , ,
2 4 5 f j 4 4 ; 2 2 9 ' `
2 6 8 , 0 ��3 ; 9 7 9 , ;
2 8 5 2 8 3 4 3 8 ��, ' "
3 0 6 7 6 8 , 1 5 9 , . .
3 ? 9 ; 7 4 8 0 5 8 > ; ,
3 5 4 Q 5 0 , 3 2 4 , ' . " ,
2 , 6 1 2 5 1 4 ; 9 6 6 "
3 7 9 , 5 9 7 0 8 7
4 0 5 , 6 � 5 8 9 7 :
4 3 3 3 ; 1 7 2 ' 0 0
4 6 2 5 4 2 7 9 3
5 2 7 Q 3 3 9 4 7
5 6 1 , 3 3 1 9 0 5
5 9 6 , 2 3 0 , 4 5 6 .
6 3 3 , 7 2 2 3 4 6 '
6 7 3 5 6 8 , $ S 6 i ' .
5 , 1 C 4 4 7 , 4 7 8 ; .
7 1 5 4 4 6 7 , 0 0 .
7 9 i 7 8 2 , 4 7 2
9 , t 7 �� ����1 ' ����
n y ��y y
t t r i 6 3 8 , 6 7 5 ;
R e a l
6 . 6 % 1 5 5 , 6 5 6 , 4 2 2
5 . 2 % 1 6 0 , 4 9 2 , 3 4 4
5 . 5 % 1 6 6 , 0 5 5 , 7 6 4
$ 4 8 2 , 2 0 4 , 5 3 0
% C h a n g e
6 : 1 : 8 0 , 3 1 3 , 7 6 2 , "
6 ' 1 9 8 , 2 9 9 , 3 1 0
o ' . 2 1 9 , 8 4 2 , 2 5 6
6 , 2 3 0 7 4 4 , 1 : 7 8
6 , ; , i ' ��4 1 ; 7 9 4 4 5 8
2 5 3 4 4 8 ; Q 5 2
o : �� ; ��6 5 ; 6 2 6 , 4 6 5 .
. . . ; 9 , 9 8
7 8 p b 7 , 9 4 1
9 0 ��2 2 6 ��3 . 3 ( t
U 2 9 4 1 4 7 , 6
` 1 5 4 3 5 3 Z 8 ,
2 9 ^ 1 6 5 , Q 4 5 "
3 5 7 9 3 8 1 9 7 A 3 7 1 d 3 4 , 1 ' l
3 8 5 1 2 5 , 9 4 5
3 9 8 , � 6 ��, 4 8 G
5 2 %
5 ; 4 % 1
4 i 8 % ' "
4 : r ! o `
4 4 %
4 ; 4 � ! 0
4 : 1 %
4 A c ; :
4 . 4 % ' ,
4 i 1 % '
3 8 %
3 6 " l 0 l
N o t e : N o m i n a l d o l l a r s r e f l e c t a c t u a l d o l l a r s ( y e a r o f r e c e i p t ) . R e a l d o l l a r s a r e a d j u s t e d f o r i n f l a t i o n ,
r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e p u r c h a s i n g p o w e r o f f u t u r e r e c e i p t s i n c u r r e n t y e a r a m o u n t s ( 2 0 0 6 $ ) . A m o u n t s p r e s e n t e d
i n c l u d e d e d u c t i o n o f S t a t e B o a r d o f E q u a l i z a t i o n f e e s ( 1 . 5 % ) .
"
" A G E N D A I T E M 6
"
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
December 18, 2006
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Ken Lobeck, Staff Analyst
THROUGH:
Shirley Medina
Program Manager
SUBJECT:
10-Year Measure A Western Riverside County Highway Program
Project Recommendation
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the TAC to receive a copy of the RCTC Dec 13, 2006 agenda item
concerning the 10-Year Measure A Western Riverside County Highway Program
recommendations and CMIA submission recommendations.
Attachment: Dec 13 RCTC Board Agenda item: "10 Year Measure A Western Riverside County Highway
Program Project Recommendations"
•
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
December 13, 2006
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:.
Public/Private Financing and Delivery Plan Ad Hoc Committee
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
10-Year Measure A Western Riverside County Highway Program
Project Recommendations
PUBLIC/PRIVATE FINANCING AND DELIVERY PLAN AD HOC COMMITTEE AND
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve CMIA list and prepare submittal to the California
Transportation Commission (CTC);
2) Direct staff to prepare requests for proposals (RFP) to pursue
environmental clearance work leading to the eventual widening and
improvement of 1-215,.1-15, SR-91 and 1-10;
3) Adopt as a priority, improvements that would widen 1-215 by at least
one lane in each direction between Box Springs Road and 1-15;
4) Adopt as, a priority, the construction of an eastbound truck climbing
lane on 1-10 between the San Bernardino County line and 1-10;
5) Adopt as a priority, the construction of two lanes in each direction on
SR-91 between the Orange County line and 1-15 that would include
the extension of the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15 and the addition of a
general purpose lane in each direction along with collector distributor
road systems, improved freeway to freeway connections with 1-15
and SR-71, and an eastbound auxiliary lane between SR-241 and
Serfas Club Drive;
6) Adopt as a priority, the construction of two high occupancy toll (HOT)
lanes in each direction on 1-15 between SR-74 and the San Bernardino
County line and the addition of an high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane .
in each direction from .the confluence of 1-15/1-215.and •SR-74 along
with support for the rapid implementation of the French Valley
Parkway interchange;
7) Seek legislative approval for toll facilities on SR-91 and 1-15; and
8) Return to the Commission with a detailed report and construction
staging plan for the widening of SR-91 and 1-15 with a special
emphasis on HOT and HOV lane policy considerations and begin
discussions with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)
regarding operational issues between the 91 Express Lanes and
proposed HOT lane facilities in Riverside County.
Agenda Item 10
222
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
With. the ;completionof a .comprehensive work effort to update projected
Measure A revenues,assess innovative financing possibilities such: as public/private
partnerships. and HOT lanes, and in the updating; scope, cost and. traffic data for
Western Riverside` County highway projects, Commission staff concluded that a
focus be placed on the county's most highly .impacted highway corridors.
Specifically, .1-215, 1-10, 1-15 and SR-91 freeways are in need of immediate
improvement.
The 'timingof the recent work effort to update data for a delivery plan has 'come at
an opportune time. The approval of Propositions 1 A and 1 B willhave the effect of
generating significant state- revenue after years of: shortfalls`. The . added
investment, especially in the area of highway corridors will be ' especially
competitive and a'premium will be placed on timely project delivery,;.
2009 Measure A Plan and. State Highways in Western Riverside County
The state's 'tight, deadlines for the CMIA program with a focus ',on rapid project
deliveryare an important impetus for an aggressive implementation:strategy for the
2009 Measure: A Western Riverside County .state highway program. ' Riverside -
County continuesto be one of the fastest growing areas in the nation. Congestion
continues to, be a burgeoning problem andthe maturation of the; area's economy
depends on rapid infrastructure development.
Toward that end, Riverside County is currently .,horne, toa number of ambitious,
projects that are already under. construction. The most obvious' example is the
reconstruction- of the' 60/91 /215 _interchange in ;Downtown Riverside that the
Commission played an important role in guaranteeing ,funding. Only a,few miles
westofthat location, ; crews are widening SR-6,0 between Valley Way and 1-15
with the addition of a: general, purpose lane and an HOV lane ineach direction.
SR-60 was also improved earlier by the Commission with an addition .of ,an HOV'
lane through Moreno Valley. Yet another project is underway tobuild the Cantu
Galleano interchange on 1-15 and next year construction will begin to rebuild the
Green River Road interchange on SR-91. The bottom; line is that construction is
already taking place at a rapid rate in Western Riverside County, but even more is
needed and the Sooner the better.
In order to accomplish this vision, staff is recommending a comprehensive delivery
plan that will seek to invest approximately ;$2 billion on four freeway corridors over
the next ;ten ;years. Implementing the delivery; . plan ' will require . aggressive
timetables; for environmental clearance, engineeringand design, right-of-way
acquisition, and !construction. Moreover, it will require a comprehensive fiscal plan
utilizing funding from the CMIA, Measure A, bonding, against future Measure A
revenues,' State! Transportation Improvement Program'(STIP) funding, federal funds,
Agenda Item 10
223
•
and toll revenues from HOT lanes.. This will need to be done in an environment in
California where many other counties will also be aggressively seeking to leverage
their own sales tax measure dollars and state bond revenue.
Specifically regarding the financial situation, the 2009 Measure A program is
expected to provide $486.2 million over its first 10 years. Given the plan's goal of
investing $2 billion in freeway investments during the first 10 years, this leaves a
gap of more than $1.5 billion. The Commission will likely compete well for CMIA
funding and will receive its proportionate share of STIP dollars that will begin to
close a significant percentage of the financial gap, but additional funding will still
be needed. One option that .will be discussed in this staff report is use of
HOT lanes that could be financed through user tolls while adding more capacity.
Corridor Focus for Recommendations
Staff recommends a focus on 1-215, 1-10, 1-15 and SR-91, while continuing long-
term development work on large-scale projects such as the development of the
Mid County Parkway (MCP), realignment of SR-79, the bi-county widening of 1-215
to San Bernardino County and Major Investment Study (MIS) recommendations that
include a new facility parallel to SR-91 and the Corona- Irvine Expressway which
could include a tunnel through the Cleveland National Forest.. All of these projects
are likely to cost as much as a billion dollars each and are unlikely to be ready for
construction in the near -term. Most importantly, the four :existing corridors of
emphasis are heavily -congested and need to be improved before projects such as
MCP can be built and connected to them.
The following are the detailed project improvements suggested by corridor:
Interstate 215
The 2009 Measure A Expenditure Plan (Expenditure Plan) includes a lane in each
direction on the 1-215 from Eucalyptus Avenue to the 1-15/1-215 split. For planning
purposes,
staff has divided the 1-215 into three segments:
• 1-15/1-215 to Scott Road - Add one lane in each direction
• Scott Road to Nuevo Road - Add one lane in each direction
• Nuevo Road to Box Springs Road - Add one lane in each direction.
The southernmost two segments are a priority because the I-215 narrows to only
two lanes in each direction south of D Street in Perris to the 1-15. The proposed
build scenario for these segments would add a mixed flow lanein each direction
from the 1-15/1-215 split to Nuevo Road. This proposed improvement would not
only provide needed capacity but would establish three lanes in each direction on
1-215.
Agenda Item 10
224
Additionally, Measure- A identifies the northern limit of the 1-215 improvement as
being Eucalyptus Avenue. The build scenario proposes to extend the northern `limit
from Eucalyptus Avenue to Box Springs Road. The reason for this exte sion is that
the 2009 Measure A project would leave a gap between the SR-60/I215 east
junction (East Junction) and Eucalyptus Avenue. The northernmost segment of the
1-215 corridor, Nuevo Road to Box Springs Road, adds an HOV lane that would, link
to the east junction project.
Due to existing right-of-way located in the center median from a cost/benefit
perspective, the •improvement of .1-215 rates strongly in providing significant
congestion relief benefits at a . relatively lower : cost. In terms of project
development; this corridor is,.less complicated than some projects because most of
the needed land to do the widening project is already located in the existing
freeway right-of-way. Most importantly; the "state 'of California' Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) is about to complete its 'project study report '(PSR) for
these improvements, whichmeans that one important task will be done by the end
of the year. The lower right-of-way hurdle along with=the completion of the PSR
could allow that all three segments can be under construction by 2012.
The overall cost, of the proposed 1-215 improvement's is, estimated at $293' million.
Measure A initially set aside:$210 million for the project. If the Commission were
to proportionally increase the Measure A funding :level for. the 1-215 by the
128.4 percent 'projected increase in future revenues, .funding from 'the Measure
alonewould be:; sufficient. However if the project successfully obtains CMIA
funding, or by using available STIP funds, this would t free up Measure A funds to
be allocated to additional Measure A projects.
Paying for these improvements will require a combination of dollars beginning either
with CMIA or STIP along with Measure A. No matter the outcome regarding the
CMIA, staff recommends keeping to the state's., goal of having projects under
construction, by' 2012. Thisrequiresthe Commission to enter into contracts for .
environmental clearance early next year, and staff irecommends receiving the
authorization to immediately issue' a RFP to support this work.
Interstate 10
Much like the proposed 1-215 project, additions to 1-1.O ;provide significant`; benefits
at a relatively lower cost. San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and
Caltrans recently 'completed ::a, truck climbing lane east of Redlands to
Live Oak Canyon.. The ',Commission's .project; will not connect ;with the
San Bernardino : climbing lane, but it will :create ,additional capacity on this
-eastbound/uphill segment of I-10.
Agenda Item 10
"
W i t h t h e e x c e p t i o n o f i m p r o v i n g t h e i n t e r c h a n g e a t S R - 6 0 , t h e e a s t b o u n d t r u c k
c l i m b i n g l a n e i s t h e o n l y p r o j e c t f o r 1 - 1 0 t h a t w a s i n c l u d e d i n ' t h e E x p e n d i t u r e P l a n .
G i v e n t h e i n c r e a s e i n t r u c k t r a f f i c t h r o u g h t h e B a n n i n g P a s s a r e a , t h e p r o j e c t i s
n e e d e d a n d c a n b e i m p l e m e n t e d q u i c k l y .
T h e n e w l y e s t i m a t e d c o s t o f c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e e a s t b o u n d t r u c k c l i m b i n g l a n e i s
$ 4 7 m i l l i o n , w h i c h i s a c t u a l l y l e s s t h a n t h e o r i g i n a l $ 7 5 m i l l i o n e s t i m a t e i n t h e
E x p e n d i t u r e P l a n . T h e f i r s t p l a n o f a c t i o n f o r t h i s p r o j e c t i s t o w o r k w i t h C a l t r a n s
D i s t r i c t 8 o r a p r i v a t e c o n t r a c t o r t o c o m p l e t e a P S R a n d t h e n i s s u e a R F P f o r
e n v i r o n m e n t a l c l e a r a n c e . T h e P S R a n d s u b s e q u e n t e n v i r o n m e n t a l w o r k c o u l d b e g i n
e a r l y n e x t y e a r . " S t a f f i s s e e k i n g a u t h o r i z a t i o n t o e i t h e r w o r k w i t h C a l t r a n s o r t o
i s s u e a R F P f o r t h e P S R a n d t o : i s s u e a R F P u p o n i t s c o m p l e t i o n f o r t h e
e n v i r o n m e n t a l w o r k .
S t a t e R o u t e 9 1
I n 1 9 8 8 , t h e w i d e n i n g o f t h e R i v e r s i d e F r e e w a y i S R - 9 1 ) w a s t h e c o r n e r s t o n e
p r o j e c t i n t h e c a m p a i g n t o a p p r o v e t h e 1 9 8 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m . U p o n i t s
p a s s a g e , t h e C o m m i s s i o n m o v e d q u i c k l y . t o w i d e n S R - 9 1 t h r o u g h C o r o n a a n d m u c h
o f R i v e r s i d e . W i t h t h e p a s s a g e o f a n o t h e r d e c a d e , R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y h a s s e e n
r e c o r d h o u s i n g a n d p o p u l a t i o n g r o w t h a n d . j o b c e n t e r s i n O r a n g e C o u n t y h a v e
e x p a n d e d r e s u l t i n g i n t h o u s a n d s o f a d d i t i o n a l R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y r e s i d e n t s u s i n g t h e
S R - 9 1 t o g e t t o a n d f r o m w o r k .
A t t h e e n d o f 2 0 0 5 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a l o n g w i t h t h e O C T A a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
C o r r i d o r A g e n c i e s c o n d u c t e d a M I S t o c o n s i d e r c r o s s - c o u n t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n
i m p r o v e m e n t s . T h e e f f o r t w a s a n a t u r a l o u t g r o w t h o f ' O C T A ' s p u r c h a s e o f t h e 9 1
E x p r e s s L a n e s a n d t h e c r e a t i o n o f a s t a t e - m a n d a t e d a d v i s o r y c o m m i t t e e f o r t h e
c o r r i d o r t h a t c o n s i s t s o f b o a r d m e m b e r s f r o m b o t h c o u n t i e s .
T h e M I S p r o d u c e d a c o m p r e h e n s i v e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n t h a t i n c l u d e d s h o r t , m e d i u m
a n d l o n g - t e r m c o u r s e s o f a c t i o n . T h e s h o r t - t e r m a c t i o n s h a v e c o m m e n c e d . w i t h t h e
o p e n i n g o f a n a u x i l i a r y l a n e o n t h e w e s t b o u n d s i d e , t h e a d d i t i o n o f e x p r e s s b u s
s e r v i c e a n d t h e e n h a n c e m e n t o f M e t r o l i n k s e r v i c e i n c l u d i n g w e e k e n d t r a i n s . O C T A
i s a l s o p u r s u i n g e n v i r o n m e n t a l c l e a r a n c e f o r a n e a s t b o u n d a u x i l i a r y l a n e b e t w e e n
t h e S R - 2 4 1 t o l l r o a d a n d S e r f a s C l u b D r i v e .
T h e r e m a i n d e r o f t h e M I S r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s u g g e s t e d w i d e n i n g o f S R - 9 1 a s a
c o u r s e o f a c t i o n t o b e f o l l o w e d b y t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f a l t e r n a t i v e c o r r i d o r s s u c h a s
a p a r a l l e l f a c i l i t y a d j a c e n t t o t h e f r e e w a y a n d t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a n e w h i g h w a y
b e t w e e n C o r o n a a n d I r v i n e . T h e n e w C o r o n a E x p r e s s w a y c o u l d t r a v e l t h r o u g h t h e
C l e v e l a n d N a t i o n a l F o r e s t a n d w o u l d r e q u i r e s i g n i f i c a n t t u n n e l i n g s t r u c t u r e s .
A g e n d a I t e m 1 0
2 2 6
With the passage of Measure M. in. Orange County, the possibility of receiving state
funding for the SR-91 HOV lane project in Downtown. Riverside and the completion
of the Commission's analysis of public/private partnerships, it is the perfect time
for the Commission to consider a major transformation of the: SR-91 through
Corona and Riverside.
In looking: at:the. Expenditure, Plan, the specified improvements forSR-91 fall short
of the expansion that is needed along the corridor. Merely adding another lane to
SR-9.1 will have limited benefit. Additionally there are; problem hot spots such as
near 1,-15 and .Main .Street, where drivers are forced to make numeroustransition
moves in a, confined area. A collector distributorroad system is an excellent way
of addressing this; kind of problem by adding lanes alongside the freeway to allow'
for ingress, egress, lane changes and weaving off the freeway mainline thus
improving traffic flow and provide safety benefits. A potential issue is this, type of
system improvement is not specifically identified in the Measure A program.
Another Expenditure Plan issue is in: the area of freeway to freeway connections.
For example the connector between the eastbound` SR-91 and northbound SR=71
was allocated only $26 million fora simple enhancement of the existing loop ramp
that is already in place at that location. Given the congestion in the area, what is
really needed is a.much larger fly -over structure that would allow for more cars to
transition between the. two freeways and is expected to cost $78 million.
In improving SR-91, the Commission must also consider the potential traffic
disruption caused by construction. Adding one lane ata. time inperpetuitywould
add capacity but would .result inrecurrent construction impacts to (residents,
businesses and commuters for only an incremental improvement.
To address this -situation, staff suggests .the implementation :of a major capacity
increase on SR-91 to be built at one time in order to bring improvements as quickly
as possible while minimizing disruption and also allowing for the possibility of
building an overheadviaduct structure in the future as called for in: the .MIS. .
The only problem with this approach is its cost. The Measure A program ,allocates
$1.61, million for .: a- new . lane in each direction between Orange County and
Pierce Street, $243 million for an HOV to HOV connector with 1-15' and $26 million
to upgrade the existing loop connector with SR-71, a total of $430 million. These
figures fall short :of.the recently updated costs.
Instead, $815 million will be needed for the following projects that would. provide
projects specified in Measure.A and additional improvements to what is called for in
the Expenditure Plan:
Agenda Item 10
227
" A d d a m i x e d f l o w l a n e f r o m O r a n g e C o u n t y l i n e t o P i e r c e S t r e e t
" C o n s t r u c t e a s t b o u n d a u x i l i a r y l a n e f r o m O r a n g e C o u n t y l i n e t o S e r f a s C l u b
D r i v e
" B u i l d c o n n e c t o r i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d c o l l e c t o r / d i s t r i b u t o r s y s t e m a t S R - 7 1
" B u i l d c o n n e c t o r i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d c o l l e c t o r / d i s t r i b u t o r s y s t e m a t 1 = 1 5
" B u i l d t w o H O T l a n e s f r o m O r a n g e C o u n t y l i n e t o 1 - 1 5 .
T h e r e s u l t w i l l b e t h e a d d i t i o n o f t w o n e w l a n e s o f c a p a c i t y o n S R - 9 1 i n b o t h
d i r e c t i o n s b e t w e e n O r a n g e C o u n t y a n d I - 1 5 . I n . t h e e a s t b o u n d d i r e c t i o n , t h e n e t
l a n e i m p r o v e m e n t w i l l b e t h r e e l a n e s t o S e r f a s C l u b . D r i v e w i t h t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f
t h e e a s t b o u n d a u x i l i a r y l a n e . E a s t o f 1 - 1 5 , t h e n e t g a i n w i l l b e a m i x e d f l o w l a n e i n
e a c h d i r e c t i o n .
T h e k e y t o a c h i e v i n g t h i s i s t h e u s e o f H i g h O c c u p a n c y T o l l L a n e s ( H O T ) L a n e s .
E s s e n t i a l l y , i t w o u l d i n v o l v e e x t e n d i n g t h e e x i s t i n g 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s t o I n t e r s t a t e
1 5 . T h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y p o r t i o n o f t h e f a c i l i t y w o u l d b e p u b l i c l y - o w n e d b y R O T C ,
b u t i t w o u l d o b v i o u s l y r e q u i r e f u l l c o o p e r a t i o n w i t h O C T A s o t h a t c o m m u t e r s s e e
t h e f a c i l i t y a s a s e a m l e s s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s y s t e m . T h e t w o H O T L a n e s w o u l d
r e p l a c e t h e e x i s t i n g H O V l a n e w h i c h c u r r e n t l y e x i s t s i n t h e s a m e a r e a . A l o n g w i t h
t h e H O T l a n e s w i l l b e t h e a d d i t i o n o f t h e g e n e r a l p u r p o s e l a n e f r o m t h e O r a n g e
C o u n t y L i n e t o P i e r c e S t r e e t i n R i v e r s i d e .
H O T L a n e P o / i c y I s s u e s
T h e i d e a : t o r e p l a c e a n e x i s t i n g H O V l a n e w i t h a H O T l a n e i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h n e w
f e d e r a l p o l i c y t h a t w a s e s t a b l i s h e d b y t h e p a s s a g e f o r S A F E T E A L U . H O T l a n e s a r e
r e c o g n i z e d a s a t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o n t r o l m e a s u r e ( T C M ) f o r a i r q u a l i t y p u r p o s e s .
I n t h e c a s e o f n e i g h b o r i n g S a n D i e g o C o u n t y , H O V l a n e s o n 1 - 1 5 i n n o r t h e r n
S a n D i e g o C o u n t y w e r e c o n v e r t e d t o H O T l a n e s a n d a r e o f t e n r e f e r r e d t o a s
" m a n a g e d l a n e s . " T h e c o n v e r s i o n w a s d o n e i n S a n D i e g o C o u n t y b e c a u s e t h e
l a n e s w e r e u n d e r u t i l i z e d :
C a r p o o l s a r e r e l e v a n t i n t h i s d i s c u s s i o n b e c a u s e H O T l a n e s a r e d e s i g n e d t o a l l o w
c a r p o o l s t o t r a v e l f o r e i t h e r a r e d u c e d c o s t o r f r e e o f c h a r g e w h i l e s i n g l e o c c u p a n t
v e h i c l e s p a y t h e f u l l f a r e . T h i s e n c o u r a g e s c a r p o o l i n g j u s t a s H O V l a n e s d o w h i l e
a l l o w i n g e v e r y o n e t o e n j o y t h e t i m e a d v a n t a g e o f t h e l a n e s i f t h e y a r e w i l l i n g t o
p a y t h e t o l l .
T h e p o l i c y i s s u e t o c o n s i d e r i s t h a t t h e 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s d e f i n e a c a r p o o l a s t h r e e
o r m o r e p a s s e n g e r s r a t h e r t h a n j u s t t w o . I n m o s t c a s e s , t h r e e - p l u s c a r p o o l s : t r a v e l
f o r f r e e i n t h e 9 1 E x p r e s s L a n e s e x c e p t i n t h e a f t e r n o o n e a s t b o u n d r u s h h o u r
w h e r e t h e y a r e c h a r g e d h a l f - p r i c e . T h e i s s u e o f t w o - p l u s v e r s u s t h r e e - p l u s
w i l l s o o n h i t S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a a s H O V l a n e s c o n t i n u e t o f i l l w i t h c a r p o o l s ,
a l t e r n a t i v e - f u e l v e h i c l e s a n d h y b r i d s . T h e H O V l a n e o n t h e S R - 9 1 i s a l r e a d y
c o n g e s t e d d u r i n g r u s h h o u r s , w h i c h c o u l d e v e n t u a l l y c o m p e l C a ! t r a n s t o r a i s e t h e
r e q u i r e m e n t t o t h r e e o r m o r e o c c u p a n t s .
A g e n d a I t e m 1 0
2 2 8
Most importantly, the Commissionn's modeling and 'research work on public/private
partnerships and toll roads has found that allowing carpools of two or more, rather
than three or more, would overwhelm the capacity of the HOT lanesrendering
them unattractive for toll users. The experience of OCTA with: the 911 Express
Lanes has shown that the .three -plus definition is not onerous, ))has encouraged
carpool formation and has actually led to an increase in the number of people who
travel in the toll lane. The Commission must recognize that constructing HOT lanes
on SR-91 and I-15 provides added capacity, allows for projects; to be delivered
sooner .with ,a separate funding stream and affords the possibility ,of future; revenue
generation. While a. strategy :that • includes HOT lanes maybe controversial, the
added capacity; benefit is too significant to ignore.
The attractiveness of using HOT lanes in Riverside County .is the ability to offer
capacity .on :SR-91 that exceeds what is "provided in Measure A and to be able to
provide the added capacity through a separate : financing stream that ::would be
supported, through user tolls. This type of financing would not apply against
Measure.A's $500, million bonding cap because MeasureA funds would not be
used to guarantee the repayment of the financing: As a result, (the Commission
would use Measure A.and state funds to construct .the freegeneralpurpose lane
and bond against future HOT lane tolls to build the :HOT lanes: Future excess
revenue . could `then be used for additional_ improvements in the same SR-91
corridor.
Moving forward with such a large project raises a number of complexities that do
not exist with ,the recommendations on 1-215 and 1-1 O. The size and scope of the
project will require a more robust environmental clearance effort than on the other
corridors .and will also involve.; :the acquisition' of., right-of-way.; The •.idea of
introducing HOT lanes and tollswill also require a significant public outreach and
education ;:program. The introduction of HOT lanes would also requires added
coordination with', OCTA and staff believes that the first steps of that work should
begin immediately along with theneed to seek legislative approval for HOT lanes in
Riverside' County. : Such legislative approval should also provide for the use of
innovative contracting and bidding methods . such as design -build. Staff.
recommends moving forward; on .the overall package of the ;HOT .lanes and
accompanying general purpose and auxiliary lanes. This would.require an RFP for
environmental clearance and subsequently a _ contract : for construction 'staging to
work in concert' with improvements on 1-15. Staff also seeks authorization to begin.
communication with OCTA on toll coordination policies and to, seek, legislative .
approval for HOT lane authorization. As it is currently envisioned, the pricing
structure for tolls' would be :similar to the structure: used by OCTA' .although
additional' work on projections will need final refinement.
Staff swill return to the. Commission early, next year with: a full report on toll policies
such as .the use ,;of transponders, pricing, public outreach and legislative issues.
Agenda Item 10
229
•
This is necessary because the current staff recommendation does not irreversibly
bind .the Commission to HOT lanes. At any point in time, the Commission could
reject tolls as a financing strategy but will have to do so with the realization that
Measure A and state funding will not be sufficient to fund such a comprehensive
$810 million improvement on this corridor.
Interstate 15
Widening 1-15, especially in sections adjacent to SR-91 and SR-60 are absolutely
necessary to improve mobility in Western Riverside County. Much like 1-215, most
of the needed land for widening is located within the existing right-of-way of the
freeway. The Expenditure Plan sets aside $359 million for the addition of one lane
in each direction of 1-15 from SR-60 to the San Diego County line. The description
does not specify whether the lane would be :a general purpose lane- or an
HOV lane, although is has been assumed that air quality rules would require an
HOV lane.
Widening the 1-15 as called for in the Expenditure Plan is now estimated to cost as
much as $900 million. Given the proposed. Measure A commitments on SR-91,
1-21.5 and 1-10, Measure A funds will need either a significant infusion of state and
federal dollars or funding from HOT lane tolls. Yet another source could be from an
envisioned "freeway fee" on new development, however that study is about to
begin Phase II and will not be completed until next year. Moreover, the amount of
time needed to generate funding from such a fee, as well as the policy
considerations that it would entail, make it difficult to predict when or if such a fee
would be enacted.
Much like the case on SR-91, the addition of one lane in each direction on 1-15 will
have only a limited, beneficial effect on congestion. Two lanes are necessary and
staff recommends the development of two HOT lanes from SR-74 to the -San
Bernardino County line. This would bring added capacity to a congested area,
allow for rapid development with financing from future tolls and allow for a
comprehensive HOT system with a direct connector to the proposed HOT lanes on
SR-91.
Considering HOT lanes on 1-15 involves many of the same policy issues that exist
with the HOT lane proposal for SR-91. Once again, allowing carpools of two or
more would overwhelm the capacity of the lane, and legislative authorization is still
necessary and federal approval will be needed since 1-15 is an interstate highway.
The major difference between 1-15 and SR-91 is that there is not an existing
HOV lane on 1-15.. This proposal does not convert an existing facility, but instead
provides two _lanes of added capacity in eachdirection while still offering an
attractive incentive to form carpools. Also, the pricing for HOT lanes on 1-15 are
projected through modeling at a much lower rate on than on SR-91.
Agenda Item 10
230
The first phase in the 10-yearprogram should focus on the portion of 1-15,between
SR-74 and San Bernardino ' County, although additional. extensions toward San
Diego County could come shortly thereafter. Along ,with, the HOT lanes, the
Commission; will seek to construct an HOV lane in each direction; between SR-74
and the 1-215 interchange. In addition to these improvements, theconstruction of
French Valley Parkway will add significant capacity to the freeway south of the
interchange. For that reason; staff has added the French Valley Parkway project for
consideration as part of the Commission's CMIA submittal The completion of the
French Valley Parkway is of great regional benefit and Commission will work
closely with,the city of Temecula to assure expeditious .implementation.
4,
To summarize staffs- recommendation for 1-15, it is quite similar :to the steps
proposed for SR-91. Once ,again, Caltrans is ready to .wrap up?its PSR ifor this
facility. Immediate work should take place for .environmental clearance and a
construction staging plan to ensure that improvements on '1-15 arelimade inconcert
with SR-91 Legislative authorization is also necessary andstaff should be directed
to begin talks with OCTA and perhaps SANDAG regarding toll policies, billing and
other procedural matters. Once again, the approval of these recommendations
does not irreversiblybind the Commission to HOT lanes for 1-15 but it willbegin the
process necessary, to; move forward as quicklyas possiblewith additional
improvements.
Future Policy Issues.
The comprehensive ; project recommendations for the .first 10 years of the
Measure A Western Riverside County Highway program will require a number of
future Commission decisions and staff work to ensure its fulls implementation.
Contracts :will be required for environmental clearance,' right-of-way acquisition,
design, construction staging, bond financing,: public outreach, construction
management and ;eventual construction. Each of these contracts will require formal
Commission action..
In addition to the ongoing ,implementation items, there are larger policy issues that
will need to be addressed. The first will be the limit i; in ,Measure A on bonding
against future revenue. Measure A contains an artificial' limit of $500 million. With
projections showing strong growth in future Measure A revenue, the Commission
should consider going to: thevoters in a future election to raise, this limit.- The
Commission's credit rating is .unsurpassed among public transportation agencies
and the financial industry has repeatedly assured the Commission that a raise in the
limit is in order and would not impact its credit rating.:
Another issue ,'regardsthe proportionality_ of revenues as they grow above the
original estimates that are contained in Measure A. Overall, Measure A originally
projected $1.02 billionrfor Western. County highways. iThe UCLA iwork effort now
Agenda Item 10
231
s�
Priority
Order
1
Project Description
SR-91 HOV Lanes, Adams to 60/91 /215 IC
Cost
(000's)
$ 238,000
Request
(000'sl
$ 161,000
2
SR-91 E/B Auxiliary Lane, SR-241 to SR-71
$ 81,000
$ 74,000
3
1-215 Add 1 MF Lane, 1-15/1-215 IC to Scott Road
$ 56,000
$ 56,000
4
1-215 Add 1 MF Lane, Scott Road to Nuevo Road
$ 117,000
$ 117,000
5
1-215 Add 1 MF Lane, Nuevo Road to Box Springs Road
$ 121,000
$ 121,000
6*
1-215 TMS Field Elements, 1-15/1-215 IC to Box Springs Road
$ 68,000
$ 68,000
7
SR-71 /SR-91 IC, Connector & Collector -Distributor System
$ 99,000
$ 99,000
8
1-15 Add 1 MF & 1 HOV Lane, SR 91 /1-15 to Indian Truck Trail
$ 229,000
$ 229,000
9
CETAP - French Valley Pkwy/I-15 OC & IC Improvements
$ 135,000
$ 26,000
TOTALS $1,144,000
*The cost of TMS Field Elements will be divided in to the three segments on 1-215.
All costs are rounded
$ 951,000
Staff recommends formal adoption of this list for submittal to the CTC for
consideration. The deadline for the submittal is January 16, 2007, and the final
CTC decisions are expected in March 2007. With the exception of the SR-91 HOV
lanes, which are a 1989 Measure A project, the remainder of the list is compatible
with staff's 10-Year Delivery Plan recommendations for the 2009 Measure A
program.
The Commission and Caltrans District 8 will both submit projects for CMIA
consideration. Caltrans' recommendations will be financially constrained, making it
unlikely for the District to co -nominate every project that the Commission submits.
Regardless of Caltrans' financial constraints in nominating projects, it pledges to
assist the Comrission throughout the process.
The First Step in a Long Process
The presentation of the two staff reports are seen by staff as the framework, for
action in developing the first ten years of the Western Riverside County Measure A
highway program. The adoption of these priorities as part of an overall plan is the
first of many steps that will take place over the next few months. The most
immediate item is the: approval of the CMIA proposal that is due next month. The
outcome of the CMIA will then affect the availability of funds for the rest of the
effort. Figures will be adjusted further with the allocation of STIP funds in June.
As has always been the case, the Commission will seek to combine funds from
various sources to ensure that the priorities set by the Commission will then be
implemented as quickly as possible. The subsequent work will then be pursued as
quickly as possibleand regular updates, reports, policy decisions and action will
come before the Commission. This will be especially critical if the Commission
chooses to move forward with HOT lanes and the introduction of tolls to Riverside
County's highway system. The effort will require active participation from the
Commission on policy issues as well as in educating and informing the public.
Agenda Item 10
233
" A G E N D A I T E M 7
"
"
R I V E R S I D E
C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N
D A T E :
D e c e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 0 6
T O :
T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
K e n L o b e c k , S t a f f A n a l y s t
T H R O U G H :
S h i r l e y M e d i n a
P r o g r a m M a n a g e r
S U B J E C T :
P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B ( A B 1 2 6 6 ) L o c a l S t r e e t s a n d R o a d I m p r o v e m e n t ,
C o n g e s t i o n R e l i e f , a n d T r a f f i c S a f e t y A c c o u n t o f 2 0 0 6 S u m m a r y
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e T A C t o r e c e i v e t h e e s t i m a t e d a l l o c a t i o n s p r o p o s e d i n P r o p o s i t i o n 1 1 3
( A B 1 2 6 6 )
A t t a c h m e n t : S B 1 2 6 6 L o c a l S t r e e t s B i l l P a g e s a n d E s t i m a t e d A l l o c a t i o n s
9 C h . 2 5
h i g h - p r i o r i t y r a i l r o a d c r o s s i n g i m p r o v e m e n t s , i n c l u d i n g g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n
p r o j e c t s , t h a t a r e n o t p a r t o f t h e p r o c e s s e s t a b l i s h e d i n C h a p t e r 1 0
( c o m m e n c i n g w i t h S e c t i o n 2 4 5 0 ) o f D i v i s i o n 3 o f t h e S t r e e t s a n d
H i g h w a y s C o d e . T h e a l l o c a t i o n o f f u n d s u n d e r t h i s p a r a g r a p h s h a l l b e
m a d e i n c o n s u l t a t i o n a n d c o o r d i n a t i o n w i t h t h e H i g h - S p e e d R a i l A u t h o r i t y
c r e a t e d p u r s u a n t t o D i v i s i o n 1 9 . 5 ( c o m m e n c i n g w i t h S e c t i o n 1 8 5 0 0 0 ) o f
t h e P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s C o d e .
( k ) ( 1 ) S e v e n h u n d r e d f i f t y m i l l i o n d o l l a r s ( $ 7 5 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ) s h a l l b e
d e p o s i t e d i n t h e H i g h w a y S a f e t y , R e h a b i l i t a t i o n , - a n d P r e s e r v a t i o n
A c c o u n t , w h i c h i s h e r e b y c r e a t e d i n t h e f u n d . F u n d s i n t h e a c c o u n t s h a l l b e
a v a i l a b l e , u p o n a p p r o p r i a t i o n b y t h e L e g i s l a t u r e , t o t h e D e p a r t m e n t o f
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n , a s a l l o c a t e d b y t h e C a l i f o r n i a T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ,
f o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h e s t a t e h i g h w a y o p e r a t i o n a n d p r o t e c t i o n p r o g r a m a s
d e s c r i b e d i n S e c t i o n 1 4 5 2 6 . 5 .
( 2 ) T h e d e p a r t m e n t s h a l l d e v e l o p a p r o g r a m f o r d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t w o
h u n d r e d a n d f i f t y m i l l i o n d o l l a r s ( $ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ) f r o m t h e f u n d s i d e n t i f i e d
i n p a r a g r a p h ( I ) t o f u n d t r a f f i c l i g h t s y n c h r o n i z a t i o n p r o j e c t s o r o t h e r
t e c h n o l o g y - b a s e d i m p r o v e m e n t s t o i m p r o v e s a f e t y , o p e r a t i o n s a n d t h e
e f f e c t i v e c a p a c i t y o f l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s .
( 1 ) ( 1 ) T w o b i l l i o n d o l l a r s ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ) s h a l l b e d e p o s i t e d i n t h e
L o c a l S t r e e t s a n d R o a d I m p r o v e m e n t , C o n g e s t i o n R e l i e f , a n d T r a f f i c
S a f e t y A c c o u n t o f 2 0 0 6 , w h i c h i s h e r e b y c r e a t e d i n t h e f u n d . T h e p r o c e e d s
o f b o n d s d e p o s i t e d i n t o t h a t a c c o u n t s h a l l b e a v a i l a b l e , u p o n a p p r o p r i a t i o n
b y t h e L e g i s l a t u r e , f o r t h e p u r p o s e s s p e c i f i e d i n t h i s s u b d i v i s i o n t o t h e
C o n t r o l l e r f o r a d m i n i s t r a t i o n a n d a l l o c a t i o n i n t h e f i s c a l y e a r i n w h i c h t h e
b o n d s a r e i s s u e d a n d s o l d , i n c l u d i n g a n y i n t e r e s t o r o t h e r r e t u r n e a r n e d o n
t h e i n v e s t m e n t o f t h o s e m o n e y s , i n t h e f o l l o w i n g m a n n e r :
( A ) F i f t y p e r c e n t t o t h e c o u n t i e s , i n c l u d i n g a c i t y a n d c o u n t y , i n
a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g f o r m u l a s :
( i ) S e v e n t y - f i v e p e r c e n t o f t h e f u n d s p a y a b l e u n d e r t h i s s u b p a r a g r a p h
s h a l l b e a p p o r t i o n e d a m o n g t h e c o u n t i e s i n t h e p r o p o r t i o n t h a t t h e n u m b e r
o f f e e - p a i d a n d e x e m p t v e h i c l e s t h a t a r e r e g i s t e r e d i n t h e c o u n t y b e a r s t o
t h e n u m b e r o f f e e - p a i d a n d e x e m p t v e h i c l e s r e g i s t e r e d i n t h e s t a t e
( i i ) T w e n t y - f i v e p e r c e n t o f t h e f u n d s p a y a b l e u n d e r t h i s s u b p a r a g r a p h
s h a l l b e a p p o r t i o n e d a m o n g t h e c o u n t i e s i n t h e p r o p o r t i o n t h a t t h e n u m b e r
o f m i l e s o f m a i n t a i n e d c o u n t y r o a d s i n e a c h c o u n t y b e a r s t o t h e t o t a l
n u m b e r o f m i l e s o f m a i n t a i n e d c o u n t y r o a d s i n t h e s t a t e . F o r t h e p u r p o s e s
o f a p p o r t i o n i n g f u n d s u n d e r t h i s c l a u s e , a n y ' r o a d s w i t h i n t h e b o u n d a r i e s o f
a c i t y a n d c o u n t y t h a t a r e n o t s t a t e h i g h w a y s s h a l l b e d e e m e d t o b e c o u n t y
r o a d s .
( B ) F i f t y p e r c e n t t o t h e c i t i e s , i n c l u d i n g a c i t y a n d c o u n t y , a p p o r t i o n e d
a m o n g t h e c i t i e s i n t h e p r o p o r t i o n t h a t t h e t o t a l p o p u l a t i o n o f t h e c i t y b e a r s
t o t h e t o t a l p o p u l a t i o n o f a l l t h e c i t i e s i n t h e s t a t e , p r o v i d e d , h o w e v e r , t h a t
t h e C o n t r o l l e r s h a l l a l l o c a t e a m i n i m u m o f f o u r h u n d r e d t h o u s a n d d o l l a r s
( $ 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 ) t o e a c h c i t y , p u r s u a n t t o t h i s s u b p a r a g r a p h .
( 2 ) F u n d s r e c e i v e d u n d e r t h i s s u b d i v i s i o n s h a l l b e d e p o s i t e d a s f o l l o w s
i n o r d e r t o a v o i d t h e c o m m i n g l i n g o f t h o s e f u n d s w i t h o t h e r l o c a l f u n d s :
9 5
Ch. 25 —10 —.
(A) In the case of a city; into the city account that is designated for the .
receipt of state funds allocated for local streets and roads.
(B) In the case of an eligible county, into the county road fund.
(C) In the case of ;a city and county, into a local account that is
designated for the receipt of state funds allocated for local streets and '
roads.
(3) For the purpose of allocating funds under this subdivision to cities
and a city and county, the Controller shall use the most recent population
estimates prepared by the Demographic Research Unit of the Department
of Finance. For a city that incorporated after January 1, 1998 that does not
appear on the most recent population estimates prepared by the
Demographic Research'- Unit, the Controller shall. use the population
determined for that city under Section 11005.3 of the.. Revenue`' and
Taxation Code.
(4) Funds apportioned to a city, county, or city and county under this
subdivision shall be used for improvements to transportation facilities that
will assist in reducing local, , traffic congestion and further deterioration,
improving traffic flows, ,or traffic safety that may include, but
not be limited to, street and ,:highway pavement maintenance,.
rehabilitation, installation, construction and reconstruction of necessary ;
associated facilities such as drainage and traffic control devices, or the
maintenance, rehabilitation; installation, construction and reconstruction of
facilities that expand ridership on transit systems, safety projects to reduce
fatalities, or as a local match to obtain state. or federal transportation funds
for similar purposes.
(5) At the conclusion of each fiscal year during, which a city or county
expends the funds it has received under this subdivision; the Controller ,
may verify the city's or county's compliance with paragraph (4). Any city
or county that has not complied with paragraph (4) shall reimburse the
state for the funds it received during that fiscal year. Any funds withheld
or returned as a result of a failure to comply with paragraph (4) shall be
reallocated to the other counties and cities whose expenditures are in -
compliance.
Article 3. Fiscal Provisions
8879.25. , Bonds in the ;total amount of nineteen billion nine hundred
twenty-five million dollars ($19,925,000,000), exclusive of refunding
bonds, or so much thereof as is necessary, are hereby authorized to be
issued and sold for carrying out the purposes expressed in this chapter and .
to reimburse the General Obligation Bond Expense Revolving Fund
pursuant to Section 16724.5. All bonds herein authorized'. which have been
duly sold and deliveredas provided herein shall constitute valid` and
legally binding general obligations of the state, and the full faith and credit
of the state is hereby pledged for the punctual payment of both principal
and interest thereof.
mjgc 5May2006
SB1266 Local Street and Road Imprvmt Funds
Allocation of
CityAllocationj 1;0006s0004
LA PALMA 162081 $ 510,913
LOS ALAMITOS 12,004 S 400,000
MISSION VIEJO 97,997 $ 3,113,482
NEWPORT BEACH 832361 $ 2,648L479
ORANGE 137f801 $ 4,378,103
PLACENTIA 51,236 $ 1,627,829
RANCHO SANTA MARGARf 49,130 $ 1,560,919
SAN CLEMENTE
66,280 $ 2,105,795
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 36,073 $ 1,146,082
SANTA ANA 351r322 $ 11,161,920
SEAL BEACH 25,298 $ 803,748
STANTON
38,761 $ 1,231,483
TUSTIN 71,767 $ 2,280L123 -
VILLA PARK 6,218 S 400,000
WESTMINSTER
92,408 $ 2,935,913
YORBLINDA 7IWA;R11 66,794 S 2z122i125
AUBURN 12,975 S 412,231
COLFAX 1,825 - $ 400,000
LINCOLN 332589 $ 1,067,163
LOOMIS 6,480 S 400,000
ROCKLIN 50,920 $ 1,617,789
RLE� 104,655 $ 3,325,O15
�{yP�ORTOLA 2,150 S 400,000
Kid
BANNING 28,128 S 893z660
BEAUMONT
BLYTHE
23,145 $ 735,344
22;179 $ 704,653
CALIMESA 7,415 S 400,000
CANYON LAKE 10,939 $ 400=000
CATHEDRAL CITY 51,081 $ 1,622,905
COACHELLA 352207 $ 1,118,569
CORONA 144,661 $ 4,596,053
DESERT HOT SPRINGS 22,011 $ 699,316
HEMET
69,544 $ 2,209,496
INDIAN WELLS 4,865 S 400,000
INDIO 712654 $ 2,276,533
LAKE ELSINORE
LA QUINTA
MORENO VALLEY
40,985 $ 1,302,143
38,340 $ 1,218,108
174,565 $ 5,546,139 -
MURRIETA
92,933 S 2,952,593
NORCO 27,263 $ 866,178
PALM DESERT 49,539 $ 1,573,913
PALM SPRINGS 46,437 S 1,475,359
PERRIS 47,139 $ 1,497,662
RANCHO MIRAGE 16,672 $ 529,689
RIVERSIDE 287,820 $ 9,144,386
SAN JACINTO
312066 $ 987,004
TEMECULA 93,923 S 2,984,046
CITRUS HEIGHTS
86,883 $ '2,760,377
ELK GROVE
130,874 $ 4,158,024
FOLSOM 692445 $ 2,206,351
GALT 22,982 $ 730,166
ISLETON • 813. S 400,000
RANCHO CORDOVA
56,355 $ 1,790,466
SACRAMENTO
457,514 S 14,535,767
LaliforniaGiifinancc.com - page 6 of 10
r
•
AGENDA ITEM 8
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 8.
" ' - I N I T I A L . C I T Y T A C M E M B E R ( l : : J ? J B A N N I N G e v c , . . . ) c . . . 0 \ U - c : l ' f " " ~ 9 9 E . R a m s e y S t . , D U A N E B U R K B a n n i n g 9 2 2 2 0 - - 0 9 9 8 D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s B E A U M O N T 5 5 0 E . 6 t h S t . , J O H N W I L D E R B e a u m o n t 9 2 2 2 3 A s s i s t a n t D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s 1 4 ' - B L Y T H E 4 4 0 S . M a i n S t . , J I M R O D K E Y B l y t h e 9 2 2 2 5 P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r ( / C V A G 7 3 - 7 1 0 F r e d W a r i n g D r . , S u i t e 2 0 0 , P a l m D e s e r t 9 2 2 6 0 A L L Y N W A G G L E C A L I M E S A P . 0 . B o x 1 1 9 0 , C a l i m e s a 9 2 3 2 0 A N N E S C H N E I D E R C A L T R A N S 4 6 4 W . 4 t h S t . , 6 t h F l . , S a n B e r n a r d i n o 9 2 4 0 1 - 1 4 0 0 S E A N Y E U N G C A N Y O N L A K E { M 3 1 5 1 6 R a i l r o a d C a n y o n R d . , H A B I B M O T L A G H C a n y o n L a k e 9 2 5 8 7 C i t y E n g i n e e r C A T H E D R A L C I T Y ~ 6 8 - 7 0 0 A v e n i d a L a l o G u e r r e r o , C a t h e d r a l C i t y 9 2 2 3 4 B I L L B A Y N E C O A C H E L L A 1 5 1 5 W e s t S i x t h S t r e e t , C o a c h e l l a 9 2 2 3 6 B I L L G A L L E G O S ~ C O R O N A A M A D Q A T I A N 4 0 0 S o u t h V i c e n t i a A v e . P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r C o r o n a 9 2 8 8 2 P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t D E S E R T H O T � l . O t 1 ~ / ; ; f l S P R I N G S - 6 5 - 9 5 0 9 . 0 . N P A ; N l i i P M - E P i e r s o n B l v d . , D e s e r t P t 1 b l i e W o r l ' s B i r e e t 8 1 H o t S p r i n g s 9 2 2 4 0 E n g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t T E C H N I C A L A D ' 4 i P R Y C O M M I T T E E D E C E M B l ' l i P ' 1 8 , 2 0 0 6 T E L E P H O N E F A X E - M A I L 9 5 1 - 9 2 2 - 3 1 3 0 9 5 1 - 9 2 2 - 3 1 4 1 d b u r k @ c i . b a n n i n g . c a . u s 9 5 1 - 7 6 9 - 8 5 2 0 9 5 1 - 7 6 9 - 8 5 2 6 u l c j o h n 1 @ a o l . c o m 7 6 0 - 9 2 2 - 6 6 1 1 x 2 . 2 7 7 6 0 - 9 2 2 - 0 2 7 8 j r o d k e y @ c i t y o f b l y t h e . c a . g o v 7 6 0 - 3 4 6 - 1 1 2 7 7 6 0 - 3 4 0 - 5 9 4 9 a w a g g l e @ c v a g . o r g 9 0 9 - 7 9 5 - 9 8 0 1 9 0 9 - 7 9 5 - 4 3 9 9 a s c h n e i d e r @ c i t y o f c a l i m e s a . n e t 9 0 9 - 3 8 3 - 4 0 3 0 9 0 9 - 3 8 3 - 4 1 2 9 s e a n _ y e u n g @ d o t . c a . g o v 9 5 1 - 9 4 3 - 6 5 0 4 9 5 1 - 9 4 3 - 8 4 1 6 t r i l a k e @ a d e l p h i a . n e t 7 6 0 - 7 7 0 - 0 3 6 0 7 6 0 - 2 0 2 - 1 4 6 0 b b a y n e @ c a t h e d r a l c i t y . g o v 7 6 0 - 3 9 8 - 5 7 4 4 7 6 0 - 3 9 8 - 1 6 3 0 b g a l l e g o s @ c o a c h e l l a . o r g 9 5 1 - 7 3 6 - 2 2 3 6 9 5 1 - 7 3 6 - 2 4 9 6 a m a d q @ c i . c o r o n a . c a . u s 1 " ' � Z ' f l " 1 ' o - Z t . . ! - . C t 9 f e l ~ " Q ~ a 1 c ~ . u , . t + , . , , . e o , , . S 3 t f f ~ 8 l ! ! ! ' e l l 1 1 ~ . e 9 o ! ! l ! ! l ' ! r l 5 5 t ~ ' - ~ " A L T E R N A T E A L T E R N A T E E - M A I L K a h o n o O e i c i t y b a n n i n g @ h o t m a i l . c o m C h a d A a b y A c t i n g C i t y E n g i n e e r c a a b y @ c i t y o f b l y t h e . c a . g o v C a r o l C l a p p e r c c l a p p e r @ c v a g . o r g B i l l M o s b y w i l l i a m _ a _ m o s b y @ d o t . c a . g o v E r i c S k a u g s e t , A s s i s t a n t E n g i n e e r e s k a u g s e t @ s a n j a c i n t o c a . u s L e s l i e G r o s j e a n l g r o s j e a n @ c a t h e d r a l c i t y . g o v S e n i o r C i v i l E n g i n e e r D e p a r t m e n t o f P u b l i c W o r k s t l u c e r o @ c o a c h e l l a . o r g N e d I b r a h i m A s s i s t a n t P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r n e d . i b r a h i m @ c i . c o r o n a . c a . u s R y a n D u a r t e A s s o c i a t e E n g i n e e r 1 2 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 6
INITIAL ~ I uJ ! I 11 1:: • ~ CITY HEMET 510 E. Florida Avenue Hemet 92543 INDIAN WELLS 44-950 Eldorado Dr., Indian Wells 92210-7497 INDIO 100 Civic Center Mall, TAC MEMBER MIKE GOW TIM WASSIL Public Works Director/City Engineer Public Works Department TECHNICAL AD'4a>RY COMMITTEE DECEMBllftl"18, 2006 TELEPHONE I FAX E-MAIL 951-765-3712 1951-765-2493 mgow@cityofhemet.org 760-776-0237 I 760-346-0407 twassil@cityofindianwells.org ,,.,. ' Indio 92202 !AMIR MODARRESSI 760-342-6530 760-342-6556 amir@indio.org ~ LAQUINTA P.O.Box 1504, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta 92253 TIMOTHY JONASSON Public Works Director/City Engineer 1760-777-7042 KENSEUMALO City Engineer 760-777-7155 tjonasson@la-quinta.org LAKE ELSINORE 1/!IL 1130 South Main St., M ..::> Lake Elsinore 92530 Community Development Department l951-674-3124x244 1951-471-1418 kseumalo@lake-elsinore.org RJ Ji 90 MORENO VALLEY P.0.Box 88005, Moreno Valley 92552-0805 MURRIETA CHRIS VOGT Public Works Director/City Engineer 1951-413-3105 26442 Beckman'Court, IJIM KINLEY Murrieta 92562 Director of Public Works/City Engineer 1951-461-6077 NORCO 2870 Clark Ave., P.O.Box 428, Norco 92860-0428 PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., BILL THOMPSON Director of Public Works Palm Desert 92260-[MARK GREENWOOD 2578 Director of Public works PALM SPRINGS 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs 92262 PVVTA 125 West Murphy St., Blythe 92225 DAVE BARAKIAN Director of Public Works/ City Engineer LES NELSON City Manager 951-270-5607 760-776-6450 760-323-8253 x8732 760-922-6161 951-413-3170 I chrisv@moval.org 951-698-4509 ljkinley@murrieta.org 951-270-5622 I bthompson@ci.norco.ca.us 760-341-7098 lmgreenwood@ci.palm-desert.ca.us 760-322-8325 Dave.Barakian@palmsprings-ca.gov 760-922-4938 lnelson@cityofblythe.ca.gov ALTERNATE ·QY Patricia Castill~ Bondie Baker Assistant Engineer II Jim Smith Nick Nickerson Ed Basubas • ALTERNATE E-MAIL pcastillo@cityofhemet.org bbaker@cityofindianwells.org jsmith@indio.org nnickerson@naiconsulting.com Senior Civil Engineer I ebasubas@lake-elsinore.org Craig Neustaedter craign@moval.org Russ Napier Capital Improvement Program Manager I mapier@murrieta.org Lori Askew Associate Engineer I Laskew@ci.norco.ca.us Alana Townsend I atownsend@ci.palm-desert.ca.us Marcus Fuller 12/12/2006
" - I N I T I A L C I T Y P E R R I S i k ? 1 0 1 N o r t h ' D ' S t . , P e r r i s 9 2 5 7 0 f i t t c _ , R T A 1 8 2 5 T h i r d S t . , R i v e r s i d e 9 2 5 1 7 - 1 9 6 8 ~ R A N C H O M I R A G E 6 9 - 8 2 5 H i g h w a y 1 1 1 , R a n c h o M i r a g e 9 2 2 7 0 / r t f ; R I V E R S I D E 3 9 0 0 M a i n S t . , R i v e r s i d e 9 2 5 2 2 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t . , R i v e r s i d e 9 2 5 0 1 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t . , R i v e r s i d e 9 2 5 0 1 l k S S A N J A C I N T O 2 0 1 E . M a i n S t . , S a n J a c i n t o 9 2 5 8 3 S U N L I N E ~ J _ , 3 2 - 5 0 5 H a r r y O l i v e r T r a i l , T h o u s a n d P a l m s 9 2 2 7 6 ~ T E M E C U L A 4 3 2 0 0 B u s i n e s s P a r k D r . , T e m e c u l a 9 2 5 9 0 W R C O G 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , R i v e r s i d e 9 2 5 0 1 L I C C ~ t . . ' 1 1 ' . 4 . . t 0 { 7 ' \ T % \ . " " < t ~ > 1 ' s 8 ~ T A C M E M B E R A H M A D A N S A R I P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r M A R K S T A N L E Y D i r e c t o r o f P l a n n i n g B R U C E H A R R Y D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s T O M B O Y D D e p u t y P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r / C i t y E n g i n e e r G E O R G E J O H N S O N D i r e c t o r o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d L a n d M a n a g e m e n t A g e n c y J U A N P E R E Z D e p u t y D i r e c t o r o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d L a n d M a n a g e m e n t A g e n c y H A B I B M O T L A G H C i t y E n g i n e e r E U N I C E L O V I D i r e c t o r o f P l a n n i n g B I L L H U G H E S D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / C i t y E n g i n e e r P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t R U T H A N N E T A Y L O R - B E R G E R 1 A v t - F ~ ~ ~ , . J p " ' \ f f ' A . { I ' r u 1 } f ' I \ c ; ; M l T E C H N I C A L A D i a > R Y C O M M I T T E E D E C E M B ' f t r 1 8 , 2 0 0 6 T E L E P H O N E F A X E - M A I L 9 5 1 - 9 4 ~ 1 0 0 x 2 3 7 9 5 1 - 9 4 3 - 8 5 9 1 a a n s a r i @ c i t y o f p e r r i s . o r g 9 5 1 - 5 6 5 - 5 1 3 0 9 5 1 - 5 6 5 - 5 1 3 1 m s t a n l e y @ r i v e r s i d e t r a n s i t . c o m 7 6 0 - 7 7 0 - 3 2 2 4 7 6 0 - 7 7 0 - 3 2 6 1 b r u c e h @ c i . r a n c h o - m i r a g e . c a . u s 9 5 1 - 8 2 6 - 5 5 7 5 9 5 1 - 8 2 6 - 5 5 4 2 T B o y d @ r i v e r s i d e c a . g o v 9 5 1 - 9 5 5 - 6 7 4 0 9 5 1 - 9 5 5 - 3 1 9 8 G J o h n s o n @ r c t l m a . o r g 9 5 1 - 9 5 5 - 6 7 4 0 9 5 1 - 9 5 5 - 3 1 9 8 j c p e r e z @ c o . r i v e r s i d e . c a . u s 9 5 1 - 9 4 ~ 5 0 4 9 5 1 - 9 4 3 - 8 4 1 6 t r i l a k e @ a d e l p h i a . n e t 7 6 0 - 3 4 3 - 3 4 5 6 X 1 1 9 7 6 0 - 3 4 3 - 3 8 4 5 e l o v i @ s u n l i n e . o r g 9 5 1 - 6 9 4 - 6 4 1 1 9 5 1 - 6 9 4 - 6 4 7 5 b i l l . h u g h e s @ c i t y o f t e m e c u l a . o r g 9 5 1 - 9 5 5 - 8 3 0 4 9 5 1 - 7 8 7 - 7 9 9 1 b e r g e r @ w r c o g . c o g . c a . u s < i O ' t . . . J f 3 : . l ' 3 f 6 . 1 4 . L ~ G t , ~ c : . . . . 1 ' ' . , . ~ ' 1 1 ' ' 2 - ' ' - 4 3 ~ " A L T E R N A T E A L T E R N A T E E - M A I L H a b i b M o t l a g h C i t y E n g i n e e r t r i l a k e @ a d e l p h i a . n e t M i k e M c C o y m m ~ t r a n s i t . c o m S e n i o r P l a n n e r P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t R a n d y V i e g a s P r o j e c t M a n a g e r r a n d y v @ c i . r a n c h o - m i r a g e . c a . u s S i o b h a n F o s t e r s f o s t e r @ r i v e r s i d e c a . g o v J u a n P e r e z D e p u t y D i r e c t o r o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n j c p e r e z @ c o . r i v e r s i d e . c a . u s G e o r g e J o h n s o n D i r e c t o r o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n G J o h n s o n @ r c t l m a . o r g E r i c S k a u g s e t , A s s i s t a n t E n g i n e e r e s k a u g s e t @ s a n j a c i n t o c a . u s R o n P a r k s D e p u t y P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r - 1 2 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 6