Loading...
02 February 26, 2007 Budget & Implementation79732 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND=°IM'PLEMENTATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA TIME: 9:30 a.m. DATE: Monday, February 26, 2007 LOCATION: Board Chambers County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon .Street, 1" Floor Riverside, CA 92501 *COMMITTEE MEMBERS*** Rick Gibbs, Chair / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta Steve Adams, Vice Chair / Dom Betro, City of Riverside Brenda Salas / Barbara Hanna, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / Charles Grotke, City of Blythe Mary Craton / John Zaitz, City of Canyon Lake Gregory S. Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City Eduardo Garcia / Steven Hernandez, City of Coachella Hank Hohenstein / Yvonne Parks, City of Desert Hot Springs Bob Magee / Robert L. Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore Gordon Moller / Alan Seman, City of Rancho Mirage Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula John'F. Tavaglione, District Two / County of Riverside Jeff Stone / District Three / County of Riverside ***STAFF*** Eric Haley, Executive Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer ***AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY*** Annual Budget Development and Oversight Countywide Strategic Plan Legislation Measure A Implementation and Capital Programs Public Communications and Outreach Programs Competitive Grant Programs: TEA 21-CMAQ & STP, Transportation Enhancement and SB 821-Bicycle & Pedestrian Property Management ;,SAFE/Freeway Service Patrol TUMF Program and other/areas as may be prescribed by the Commission i > Comments are welcomedmb."y the Committee. If you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please complete, and submit a Testimony Card to the Clerk of the Commission. 11.36.06 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION- COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE www.rctc.org AGENDA* Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Monday, February 26, 2007 BOARD CHAMBERS County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 1st Floor Riverside, California In compliance .with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954:2, if you need special assistance to participate in ` a Committee meeting; please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS 4. APPROVAL OF,MINUTES. 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add an item to . the Agenda after making a .finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to the. posting . of . the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Committee. If there are less than 2/3 of the Committee members present, adding an item to . the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) Budget and Implementation Committee February 26, 2007 Page 2 6. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar'. will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 6A. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: Pg. 1) ` Receive and file the Interfund Loan Activity Report for the .second quarter ended December 31, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 6B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority .Report for .the second' quarter ended December 31, 2006; and 2). Forward to the Commission for final action. 6C. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the second quarter ended December 31, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action Budget and Implementation Committee February 26, 2007 Page 3 • 6D. , QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Overview: This item is for the Committee to: Pg. 9 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. AWARD OF AMENDMENT NO. 2, AGREEMENT NO. 02-31-009-02 TO ' SC ENGINEERING TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO STATE ROUTE 91, FROM ADAMS STREET TO THE 60/91/1215 INTERCHANGE Pg..22 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve. the award of Amendment No. 2, Agreement No. 02-31-009- 02 to SC Engineering to provide additional engineering and environmental studies required to finalize the Project Report, Environmental Document and Geometric Approval Drawings for the proposed improvements to State Route (SR) 91, from Adams Street to the 60/91/1215 Interchange, for a total amendment amount of $280,977; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute theamendment on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee February 26, 2007 Page 4 8. UPDATE . ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 4, AGREEMENT NO. 02-31- 043-04 TO ' CH2M HILL FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF A PROJECT REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FOR THE STATE ROUTE 79 REALIGNMENT PROJECT 35 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive ; an proposed update on Amendment No. 4, -.Agreement No. 02-31-043-04 to:- CH2M Hill for the sRealignment of SR-79 in the vicinity of the cities of San Jacinto and Hemet, for the development of a Project Report and Environmental Document (PR/ED): (the Project) Staff is currently negotiating the final scope of work, schedule and cost for this Amendment. This information will be included with the full agenda packet for the March 14, 2007 Commission meeting for review and :approval; and 2.) Forward to the Commission for final action. FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 TDA AND MEASURE A AUDIT RESULTS Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) . Receive and file the Transportation Development Act (TDA) a Measure A audit results report for the Fiscal Year 2005/06; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. PROPOSED POLICY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 BUDGET Overview This item is: for the Committee to: 1) Approve the proposed Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the,: Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee February 26, 2007 Page 5 11. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR THE CITIES OF MORENO VALLEY AND SAN JACINTO Overview This item is for the Committee to: Pg. 66 1) Grant the city of Moreno Valley an extension to June 30, 2008 to complete the Pan Am Boulevard and Graham Street sidewalk improvement projects; 2) Grant the city of San Jacinto an extension to June 30, 2008 to complete the Idyllwild Drive sidewalk improvement project; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 12. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the state and federal legislative update; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 13. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 14. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT Overview Pg. 71 1) This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report on attended and upcoming meeting/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. 15. ADJOURNMENT AND NEXT MEETING The next Budget and Implementation Committee meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 A.M., Monday, March 26, 2007, Board Chambers, 1s` Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. • ATTENDANCE ROSTER BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2007 9:30 A.M. NAME Ric k< G//Jp� REPRESENTING CG— bi-)s cam t. R :4 Ga► 'Tr J 6 rL /S G' n1 i5 15-4t3 Ni - f Q" TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL # c3/0 - 9/S6 • a AGENDA ITEM 4 Minutes RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE Monday, January 22, 2007 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee was called to order by Chair Jeff Stone at 9:38 a.m., in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Members/Alternates Present Members Absent Steve Adams Roger Berg Eduardo Garcia Rick Gibbs Charles Grotke Hank Hohenstein: Bob Magee Ron Roberts Jeff Stone John F. Tavaglione Chris Buydos Gordon Moller Gregory Pettis Brenda Salas 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests to speak from the public. 4. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: At this time, Chair Stone opened nominations for the slate of officers. Commissioner Bob Magee, seconded by Commissioner John Tavaglione, nominated the following slate of officers for 2007: Rick Gibbs for the, Chair position; and Steve Adams for the Vice Chair ..position. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes January 22, 2007 Page 2 No other nominations were received. Chair Stone closed the nominations. Commissioners Rick Gibbs and Steve Adams were unanimously elected as the Budget and Implementation Committee's Chair and Vice.. Chair, respectively. At this time, Commissioner Gibbs assumed the Chair. APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 23, 2006 M/S/C (Hohenstein/Tavaglione) October 23, 2006.as submitted. Abstain: Grotke . ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There were no additions or revisions to the agenda. approve the minutes 7. AWARD OF AGREEMENT NO. 07-31-069-00 FOR THE: 'REVEGETATION ADJACENT TO SR-74 SEGMENT II FROM WASSON CANYON .ROAD TO 7TH STREET IN THE CITY OF PERRIS Hideo Sugita, °Deputy Executive Director, explained that as part of the. SR-74 . widening project, re -vegetation would be performed in areas that were disturbed during construction. The request for proposal (RFP) was issued on December 20, 2006 with a bid opening on January 18, 2007. No bids were received. Staff has been in contact with potential proposers and recommends extending the RFP for seven weeks. M/S/C (Stone/Tavaglione) to direct staff to extend., the request for proposal for the revegetation adjacent to .SR-74 Segrnent II from 0.5 km east of Wasson Canyon Road to 7t" Street in thecity of Perris for seven weeks. APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING :NO. 07-31-0,97-00 FOR THE FUNDING AND JOINT DEVELOPMENT OF STATE HIGHWAY 111 IMPROVEMENTS 'FROM. 1NASHINGTON .STREET { TO WEST CITY LIMITS WITHIN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA Hideo Sugita provided information on the series of improvements on SR-111 as part of the Measure A program in Coachella Valley. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes: January 22,.2007 Page 3 MIS/C (Adams/Stone) to: 1) Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 07-31-097-00 for the funding _ reimbursement of state highwayimprovements within the city of La Quinta; 2) ` Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legalcounsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 9.. EXTENSION FOR EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT (ENA) WITH BRE PROPERTIES FOR JOINT DEVELOPMENT AT THE LA SIERRA METROLINK STATION Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, on behalf of Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director, presented the request ,for the extension of the ENA with BRE Properties due to -the complex legal . issues that have. arisen with the joint development at the La Sierra Metrolink station. Eric Haley, Executive. Director, noted that the city of Riverside is involved in the discussions as this. is a significant and complex, project. M/S/C (Adams/Hohenstein) to: 1) Approve a six-month extension for the ExclusiveNegotiating Agreement with BRE Properties for joint development at the La Sierra Metrolink .Station; 2) Direct staff to enter into -di cussions with BRE Properties regarding an increase in the good faith deposit up to an additional .$25,000; 3) Authorize the : Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute' the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. PROGRAMMING :OF CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY FUNDS FOR THE NORTH MAIN CORONA METROLINK PARKING STRUCTURE Shirley Medina, Program Manager, reviewed the funding for the North Main Corona Metrolink parking structure and explained that an: additional $15 million is needed. The project is in the design phase and near completion. . Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes January 22, 2007 Page 4 Eric Haley explained how the CMAQ monies are collected and allocated by air quality zone areas so there is no impact on the resources for 'Coachella Valley projects. ShirleyMedina added' that the project will be advertised in fall .2007 and 'begin construction in early 2008.. M/S/C (Tavaglione/Hohenstein) to: 1) Approve programming $1 5 million. of Congestion' 'Mitigation and Air Quality funds to the North Main Corona Metrolink parking structure; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action 11. 'AMENDMENT: TO ADVANCE OF FISCAL YEARS '2006/07 :CITY OHEMET MEASURE A LOCAL STREET AND ROAD FUNDS Theresia Trevino explained that the city of Hemet had requested an advance of its FY 2006/.07 local streets and roads funds from its Measure A, allocation. She stated that city staff has informed the Commission .that the city is now; in the construction bid >phase and will need the funds next :year instead of this year. M/SIC (Tavaglione/Hohenstein) to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 06=31-068.=01, ' Amendment No.. '1 to Agreement No. 06-31-068-00,to advance to the .city of Hemet Measure A Local Street and Road funds' in FY 2007/08 rather than FY 2006/07; 2) Authorize:' :the Chair, pursuant = to legal counsel review, to execute Agreement No. 06-31-068-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Advance of Measure A Local Streets and Roads Funds; and 3) Forward to the Commission ,for final action 12: PROPOSED AUDIT SCOPE FOR TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION AUDITS Theresia Trevino presented the proposed ` audit scope for . transit and transportation recipients and explained the need for the modification. The scope of services for the TDA claimants would consist ,of a financial statement and compliance audit while the scope for Measure A recipients` would consist of agreed -upon procedures starting with the FY 2006/07 audits. At. its ` November ,27, 2006 meeting, the Audit Ad Hoc Committee, reviewed and concurred with staff's recommendation. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes January 22, 2007- Page 5 M/S/C (Hohenstein/Adams) to: 1) Approve the proposed audit scope for Measure A recipients and Transportation Development Act claimants; and 2) Forward .to the Commission for final action. 13. MID -YEAR REVENUE PROJECTIONS Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager, reviewed the mid -year projections, noting that current. receipts .have revealed a decrease in December 2006 and January 2007, compared to the same period as Last year. M/SIC (Adams/Hohenstein) to: 1) Approve the mid -year revenue projections; 2) Approve the budget. adjustments to reflect the revised Measure A revenues of $3,000,000 and expenditures of $1,477,000; 3) Approve the budget adjustments to reflect the revised Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Planning. revenues of $371,803 and expenditures of $371,803; . and 4) Forwardto the Commission for final action. 14. FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND AND MEASURE A REVENUE PROJECTIONS Michele Cisneros reviewed the FY 2007/08: and Measure A revenue projections. M/S/C (Adams/Hohenstein) to: Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 1) Approve the projections of the Local Transportation fund (LTF) apportionment for the Western.- Riverside County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde -Valley areas; 2) Approve the projections for Measure A and the related allocations; and 3) forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes January 22, 2007 Page 6 15. MID -YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS Michele Cisneros presented the proposed mid -year budget adjustments. Commissioner. Magee requested clarification on the sixth .budget adjustment related to the Multi -Species Habitant Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Eric Haley explained .that the conference is sponsored,. by University of California, Riverside (UCR) and involves the Urban 'Land Institute, which is a group of nationally prominent planners and people 'in the conservation agency environments. The conference stems from national debate regarding conservation - agency effectiveness and . viability. Commission staff * believes that this is an opportunity to demonstratethat with, the MSHCP program. Commissioner Magee acknowledged that the Commission's participation in the MSHCP was to assist in transportation projects.. He expressed protest .. on this adjustment, stating that he will ' support the : motion and will not supportany additional money to the MSHCP at this time. At Commissioner Hank Hohenstein's request for details on the conference, Eric Haley stated that the conference will be held on Thursday, January 25, 2007, from 7:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and . invited the Commissioners to attend. He added that Cathy. Bechtel, Project Delivery Director, will be speaking on the Commission':s, role in the: MSHCP. He:. explained the Commission is the largest single'' contributor to open space acquisition and believes the: Commission should' be gaining, considerable support for that effort from the environmental community. Commissioner Roger Berg added that the conference is to educate the conservation community and the regulators so .that they understand what { the Commission is trying to:; do, .the interests t the Commission has in conservation and benefits of the MSHCP. Commissioner Hohenstein discussed the .impacts, of environmental approval- issues in the Coachella Valley and expressed his belief that when the Comrission looks . at the recognition of the impact ,of traffic . on environmental issues, it needs to be articulated .clearly, forcefully and some other alternative found to resolve these issues. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes January 22, 2007 Page 7 M/S/C (Adams/Stone) to: 1) . Approve a $ 229,700 increase in FY 2006/07 expenditures for mid -year budget adjustments; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 16. 2007 STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PLATFORMS AND PROGRAMS Aaron Hake, Staff Analyst, presented the proposed 2007 state and :federal legislative platforms and programs. In response to Commissioner Hohenstein's questions regarding the statement in the Federal Legislative Program brochure on the ports and goods movement, Aaron Hake replied that the Los Angeles and Long Beach ports combined are the largest. At Commissioner Magee request, Aaron Hake updated the Committee on SB 53 for state highways: performance measures. M/S/C (Berg/Hohenstein) to: 1) Adopt the 2007 Legislative Platforms and Programs; 2) Receive and file the state and federal legislative status report; 3) Approve the following bill positions: • SB 53 (Ducheny, D-San Diego) — Support in Concept; • SB 56 (Runner, R-Antelope Valley) — Support; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. 17. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR No items were pulled from the consent calendar for discussion. 18. COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS/STAFF At Commissioner Steve Adams's request regarding the taxi °program, Tanya Love, Program Manager, provided background information on the taxi demonstration program and subsequent Commission action. She indicated that there is more than adequate funding available to continue funding the taxi overflow program and the Commission encouraged Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) to continue the program as it is very cost effective both from operating and capital equipment use. She explained the Short Range Transit Plan process. is beginning for FY 2007/08 and staff will encourage that RTA use LTF to pay for those services. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes January 22, 2007 Page 8 19. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration . *by ;the : Budget ' and Implementation Committee, the meeting was adjourned at,10:27 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board • AGENDA ITEM 6A • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: February 26, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Interfund Loan. Activity Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive and file the Interfund Loan Activity Report for the second quarter ended December 31, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On April 14, 2004 the Commission approved the Interfund Loan Policy and adopted Resolution No. 04-009 "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Authorize Interfund . Loans". Subsequently, the Commission requested that the interfund loan activity be reported on a quarterly basis. The attached details list all interfund loan activity through December 31, 2006. The total outstanding interfund loan amounts as of December 31, 2006 are $460,257. Attachment: Interfund Loan Activity Report 1 • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Interfund Loan Activity Report For 2nd quarter ended December 31, 2006 Loan Amount Repayment Amount Date of Loan of Loan Begins Outstanding Lending Fund Borrowing Fund Purpose of Loan April 2, 2003 $ 300,000 July 1, 2006 $ 185,257 Measure A - WC Highway (222) Measure A - WC LSR (227) Advance to make repairs and improvements to Railroad Canyon Road March 4, 2004 • 275,000 July 1, 2009 Total 275,000 Measure A - WC Commuter Measure A - WC Highway (222) Additional local match for the SR71 Assistance (226) Widening/Animal Crossing Project $ 575,000 $ 460,257 V.\2007103 Marchlaudget 8 ImplementationlMC.Atlach.lnterlund Loan Activity Rpt.xls AGENDA ITEM 6B • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: February 26, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Single Signature Authority Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the second quarter ended December 31, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The attached report details all professional services and administrative contracts that have been executed for the second quarter ended December 31, 2006 under the Single Signature Authority granted to the Executive Director by the Commission. The unused capacity at December 31, 2006 is $442,790. Attachment: Single Signature Authority Report as of December 31, 2006. SINGLE SIGNATUROTHORITY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006 CONSULTANT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES AMOUNT AVAILABLE July 1, 2006 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $500,000.00 Douglas Wood and Associates Professional consulting services for _ 31,210.00 Arantine Hills Land Use Study O'MeliaConsulting - TranskVision Conceptual Planning Services , 26,000.00 AMOUNT USED Less retum of remaining contract value due to expiration: AMOUNT USED, net of adjustments AMOUNT REMAINING through DECEMBER 31, 2006 Towa Reabrol•DeMorst - Michele Cisneros Prepared by Reviewed by Note: Shaded area represents new contracts listed In the first quarter. 57,210.00 57,210.00 $442,790.00 REMAINING PAID AMOUNT CONTRACT AMOUNT 30,083.05-. ' 10,004.17 1,126.95> 15,995.83 40,087.22 17,122.78 V:12007103 MarchlBudget 8 ImplemenlatlonlMC.2nd Otr Single Signature Rptattach.xls • AGENDA ITEM 6C • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: February 26, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Quarterly Financial Statements STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the second quarter ended December 31, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: During the last six months of the fiscal year, staff has monitored the revenues and expenditures of the Commission. The attached financial statements present the revenues and expenditures for the first six months of the fiscal year (FY). Period closing. accrual adjustments are not included for revenues earned but not billed and expenditures_ incurred for goods and services received but not yet invoiced, as such adjustmentsare normally made during the year end closing activities. The operating statement shows the sales tax revenues for the second quarter at 3.5% of the budget. This is a result of the Governmental Accounting. Standards Board (GASB) Statement . No. 33. GASB 33 requires sales tax revenue to be accrued for the period :in which it is collected at the point of sale. The State Board of Equalization collects the Measure A funds and remits them to the Commission after the reporting period for the businesses. This creates a two -month lag in the receipt of revenues by the Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements reflect the revenues related to collections for September 2006. On a cash basis, . the Measure A and Local Transportation Fund ,(LTF) sales tax revenues are 5% and 3% higher, respectively, "than the same period last fiscal year. Federal,- state and .local government _reimbursements and other revenues are on a reimbursement basis, and the Commission will . receive these . revenues as the projects are completed and invoiced to the respective agencies. During the second quarter, an additional s i o,000,000 of commercial paper was issued primarilyfor MSHCP property acquisition. The expenditure categories are in line overall with the expectations of the budget. Administrative general legal services are higher due to communications with legal( counsel for human resource issues, commercial paper/future financing issues, and additional legislation needed to implement design -build contracting. Administrative professional services are slightly higher due to bank fees for the commercial paper program. General administrative expenditures are higher due to a one-time payment in July" for the Commission's FY2006/07 general Liability insurance. ' Intergovernmental distributions are 'expended as one-time LTF payments made a' the beginning of the fiscal year based on clairns submitted b Coachella Valle g� 9 Y Y .: ,.; y Association of Governments and Western Riverside' Council of Goverriments. Capital outlay 'reports a negative actual amount. This resulted from the reversalof the estimated expenditure accrual made at June 30, 2006:a.for office improvemen ts made ;but not yet invoiced. Staff will continue to monitor the revenues and expenditures and notify Commission of any unusual events. Attachment: Quarterly Financial Statements — December 2006 the . • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DESCRIPTION Revenues Sales tax Federal, state & local government reimbursements Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) - Other revenues Interest Total revenues Expenditures Administration Salaries & benefits General legal services Professional services Office lease & utilities General administrative expenditures Total administration Programs/projects Salaries & benefits General legal services Professional services General projects Highway engineering Highway construction Highway right of way/land Rail engineering Rail construction Rail right of way TUMF engineering TUMF construction- TUMF right of way Local streets & roads Regional arterial Special studies FSP towing Commuter assistance Property management Motorist assistance Rail operations & maintenance STA distributions Specialized transit Planning & programming services Total programs/projects • Intergovernmental distribution Capital outlay Debt service Principal Interest Arbitrage rebate tax Cost of issuance Total debt service Total expenditures Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources/uses Operating transfer in Operating transfer out Bond proceeds Payment to escrow agent Total financing sources/uses Net change in fund balances Fund balance July 1, 2006 Fund balance December 31, 2006 f/users/DreprinVmclquarterties(masler quarterly QUARTERLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 2ND`QUARTER FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED 12/31/2006 BUDGET $ 167,122,400 23,939,102 42,000,000 20,605,200 12,509,000 266,175, 702 1,771,900 182,600 1,212,800 387,300 1,090,600 4,645,200 2,858,600 1,285,300 5,449,100 4,283,968 6,423,000 48,094,556 25,988,100 7,550,000 1,741,500 5,224,000 34,174,000 4,848,000 112,725,000 58,318,300 13, 719,400 2,766,414 1,604,200 5,007,800 326,300 1,924,300 7,454,800 6,718,700 7,680,800 92,200 366,258,338 992,800 533,000 30, 364,400 9,063,600 150,000 39,578,000 412,007, 338 (145,831,636) 83,053,100 - 83,053,100 80,000,000 80,000,000 (65,831,636) 376,727,234 ACTUAL $. 58,836,172 1,184,693 14,787,026 8,166,052 4,871,592 87,845,535 773,976 140,813 631,295 193,506 582,810 2,322,399. REMAINING BALANCE $ (108,286,228) (22, 754,409) (27,212,974) (12,439,148) (7,637,408)'- . (178,330,167) 997,924 :: 41,787 581,505 193,794. 507,790 2,322,801 1,330,091 1,528,509 646,656 638,644 835,172 4,613,928 289,254 3,994,714 1,698,265 4,724,735 5,231,447 42,863,109 11,976,231 14,011,869 445,915 7,104,085 257,653 1,483,847 5,224,000 2,333,815 31,840,185 4,848,000 3,066,106 109, 658, 894 19,554,227 38,764,073 4,334,630 9,384,770 89,601 2,676,813 665,971. 938,229 1,104,726 3,903,074 11,165 315,135 299,312 1,624,988 3,477,655 3,977,145 1,820,996 4,897,704 3,157,657 4,523,143 23,751 68,449 62,650,297 954,338 (6,932) 3,040;608 3,040,608 68,960,710 18,884,825 17,865,353 17,865,353 10,000,000 10,000,000 28,884,825 376,727,234 310,895,598 $ 405,612,059 . 303,608,040 38,462 .. 539,932 30, 364,400 6,022,992 150,000 36;537;392 343,046,628' 164,716,461 (65,187,747) 65,187,747 (70,000,000) (70,000,000) 94,716,461 94,716,461 PERCENT UTILIZATION 35% 5% 35% 40% 39% 33% 44% 77% 52% . 59% 53% 50%0. 47% 50% 15% 7% 26% 11% 46% 6% 15% 0% 7% 0% 3% 34% 32 % 3% 42% 22% 3% 16% 47% 27% 41% 26% 17% 96% -1 % 0% 34% 0%• 0% 8% 17% 13% 22% 22% 13% 0% 13% -44% 100% 130% • 690'ZL9'904 • $£66'9E9'91, $ 09E'ELL'S 4£Z'LZL'9LE 9EL'694'OE- 9Z8'890Z1 9Z8'1788`8Z LSZ`LL4'94 (994'98Z'9) 000`000`01. LL9`ZOO LI. 986'666'6 • 000'000'04 000'000'04 £9E'998'LL 4£Z'19 94 • E9E'998'LL L-VE90'LL 9Z8'488'8L (0Z4'9Z9'I.)' `(1.94'98Z`94) L64'604 $ 9E0'600'094 $ - Z6lh 6Z4`994'8 $� 6E1799 $ L96'£L4'4LI , $ 90.9°0484 , $ L488£ $ 900Z'408gw80eae0uelegpund' EOL'LOL 91•£'648'8EL ` 9Z9'Z94'S - 4E3'LOL'44 bL6`49 L48'408'E94 L49't£0'9 690'0EV6 _. - 900Z'4 nine eoueleq punj 460'Z 4ZL'68434 999`846'Z (Z09'417Z'E) S9b'£ - OZI'609'L (440'LZZ) Z8L'90L'L 994'90E 48£`99 (999`6(76`£) - (6Z9`ZOVEL) (1740`Z4) 99S'646'E • 991'90£ L SE'94 460'Z - 999'488'04 . S8Z'Z68'Z £9L'170L 014096'89 £L4'L£9'Z. 404'6£4'9L - 600'069'9 809'040'£ ELVL£9'Z 9£L'£01, 809'040'£ ELVL£9'Z 9£L'£017 (Z£6'9) 8EE'496 L6V099'Z9 9L£`EOL'94 45L'£Z ` L99'L9l'E 966' 0Z8' 4 999'LLVE ZL£'66Z 994' L L 9lL'b04' I LL6'S99 409'66 0E9'4EE'4 LZZ'bSS'6L 90 4' 990' £ 99VE 4EE'994'SI. pi -ten SOL'£9 00Z'9L£ 84L'140'4Z (866`80Z) Z8L'90L'4 • 6tV4Z8'4 ZLZ`LZO'ZL £98'09£ 888`E££'LZ 96£`9Z4'4 96VT,Z9'L 600`069'9 £80'0£. 90 L' 990' e SLS'££VZ Sl8'£££'Z £99'LSZ S l6'944 L£Z'9L6' L L 04 4'48E' 4 4 Lbb' L£Z'S 000'000'v 99Z'869' 4 bSZ'68Z 968'94 ZL4'9£8 59V64E 699 959'949 S9L'.b9 46010£E'L ELL'8L . 66£'ZZ£'Z 468'Z£E 048'Z89 909'£64 962' 4£9 698'8ZZ E48'044 SZO'40L 9L6'£LL 9£9'9178'L8 £90'ZI8 Z69' 418'4 Z90'994'8 9Z0'L8L'44 £69'484`L ZL 4'9£8'85 1y101 03N19W00 £9n 1.8 301A213S 1830 £96'ES4 £S6`£S4 W V210021d 113dVd 1V31213W W00 1,60'Z 460'Z 4L5'4L4'9 L 84S`L89', 4 9Z0'L8L'b4 890'Z2 (Z£6'4) 6131.Z9`4 ZLZ'LZO'ZI £S8`09£ OZ813£'LZ Z4O'££0'L E60'Z9Z'Z 499'506 966' 28' 4 ZIE'66Z £zL 9ZL'404' L 416'999 89L'9Z OE9'4E£'4 48L'98£'4 £69'09£ 09L'L08`44 (890'LZ) 8E£'4S6 908`Z08'4 ISL'EZ 9S9'LLb'£ 994 LL 0£L'£E £59'LSZ 946'944 LZ L `Z6S £66'8Z0' L 494`ZOZ 6£8'L L 9Z4`089 `I OL9'4 989'89Z 6SS`88Z 09E'44 90£'91.Z £OZ'6££ £48' 4 4 . _ 948'OEZ £9e£ 094 SL6Z6E - 999'44 448'048 98Z'S6 813.9Z 94£'6 L4L`84 OLE L 9££'L£ 40b'£LL'b 9Z0'Z£CZI 8LE149E LE9'94£'Z4 66£'L46 09L'06 OZ8'Z6 9Z9'E 66E'998'4 04£'49 449'ZZ9`4 614'014 59Z'8Ll'.£ (09£) SL8'Z8Z LSL'8ZS'ZL $ £69'09E $ 960'81.0'LS 64Z'b68'4 L69'499 094'484 601'£9E 9L0'Se ' 449'9£L LLO`OEE'6 000` 404 4L0'95Z 604'998 604'94 $ 469`8Z6'9• $ N0110n211SN00 Aunt 30NVISISSV A311VA A311VA A1Nn00 3AVS ' ONnd A1N1100 33d NOIIVcJIlIW < LISNV211 V113H3V00 aaaan NN31S3M /ad 1V/13N39 N2131SW W210dINn NOLLVIHOdSNV211 31V1S - O1Vd V 321nSV3W 90/Lea 030N3 SHINOW XIS 210d a31aVn0 ONZ ONnd A8 S1Vn10!d nanaVno NOISSIWW00 N011` .1110dSNy211 A1Nn03 301S213n121 seoueleq pun} ul s6uey0;eN seen/seams 6uloueug le'ol lue6e moose o; wewRed speeooid pupa ;no Jelsuers 6uneied0 ul Je}sues 6uneied0 sesn/seamos 6upueug.101110 sempuedxe.(aepun),keno senueneisseox3 seinjjpuedxe lelol eolaes'Qep lelol souenss'}o woo xei meet, e6ei0c41..V Isamu! Iedpepd eovues'ciao .. Aeon° Iepdeo uo!ingwelp le;uewweno6Jelul sloalad/swei6ad le;ol sa ons 6ulwweilked g 6uluueld psume pezlleloeds suol;nquls!P V1S eoueuelulau g suoneiedo pea eouelslsse lslmlool wewe6euew Apedoad eouelslsse ie'nwwo0 . Noun clSd selpn;s leloedS iepepe jeuq6eld speol g sleans leool Lem }O I416u Spy! uonannsuoo Akira 6upeeLe6ue �Wfll Aem 104416u ilea uononesuoo Ilea 6upeeui6ue ilea. peel/item }o 4489 Remg61H uon0n.esuoo Aem4161H 6upeaupue Aemu6!H spoked '!mus0: seolnies jeuolssa}ad seovues le6el peuecj sigeueq,g seueles speloid/sweAwd uopensluluipe lelol seen puedxa enpeilsluppe lejeue0 segllgn 8 neat 03l40 saowes leuolssejod seowas le6a(leieue0 • sl401.1e4 +8 games . uoge-0slulwpy seen;lpuedx3 sanuamo Iplol ''seJeLLe • senuem»Jeq)0 (dWf1J) ae3 uone6MIN lwo'lufl uolleuodsuml swewesingwlai;uewwano6leool S ems 'leiaped xe'sales senuenea • N0Ild1210S30 AGENDA ITEM 6D • • • • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: February 26, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached are the quarterly investment and cash flow reports as required by state law and Commission policy. The County's Investment Report for the month ended. December 31, 2006 is also attached for review. Attachments: 1) Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter ended December 31, 2006 2) County of Riverside Investment Report for the Month ended December 31, 2006 9 Portfolio Investment Type Treasury Billa 0.4% LAIF 0.7% Count8y 2.^/ P3ool/C Fadaral Agency Notas 7.3% Corporate. Notas 0.2.36 Mutual Funds Statement of Compliance All of the above investments and any investment decisions made for .the quarter ended December 31, 2006 were in full compliance with the Commission's investment policy as adopted on March 8, 2006. The. Commission has adequate cash flows for six months of operations. Signed by - Chief Financial Officer 10 O Y r� W 4 Y � •eObOlemu]a0e CaG �Ym tp �N O Q W Z M sssss�s���s�g$�mh 00000 gg sgsss�mNm"1111i11 .� ,n n _ cv N alQ q v' r-,n� o =� e..Z 2 Q 0 QluQi § M§§§1g§ a 5i g5aaaaaaa 00000-0000000 � o op4p§papo�p�poQop0p0p0p0p0p�0L s s O.O s �'O N S s s s's s g,,Min n � N,NN�- o ��n o.p N y0�O,, ,- .p�p o�o. s E N g n d^ O O.N § 0 r NO•-O ri pO Ou'� tD cyO V'Y) NZ�Co<'O ltf elGe Q�<(Q7Z<jQj < N W K K m. C W Z € LL wg 0 z 2LL LL � r O 6.11121 Ye—LL �z coF w y w� $B �m c� Fpp4 �� r�5 cc F C �o }Ca Ili Um,,,,...30 . .3 G� }SFQ �p OR mLL 7 3 LL 0 U. s 1 Z C N C O 8ajh N= O W R q�jm s T Z y� �.n -, V. E3 2 m E; Ap� a N LL`m'N ���� 8iu�2zS. O�a 41; ki € MOO Fill m 3 0111 � � � �-.gym � � � °ilin 2Rm0mN rR . m m 9OFill 11B25g zo; awfl r W'cyyp} c3...9 9W�aw��f-� "Ogg! intl'E LLBzuixz=@@xin opp a'i Wi §N1H'O ODU QLLLLLLLL � LL7LLLLLL(7LL LLU U ULL LLLL r 11 Investment Objectives • Safety of Principal • Liquidity • Public Trust 0• Maximum Rate of Return County Administrative Center "Janus — Past & Future' In ancient Roman mythology, Janus, depicted with two faces looking in opposite directions, was known as the god of doors and doorways, beginnings and endings. He was frequently used to symbolize change and transitions such as the progression of past to future. Looking back on 2006, it was a very busy year both economically and politically, here and abroad. Looking forward; the challenges that lie before us will inevitably keep us guessing as to what's in. store for investors in 2007. January began with the heavily -anticipated change of power at the U.S. Federal Reserve; Alan. , Greenspan ceded control as chairman to new Fed --head Ben Bernanke. Thus far, it seems as if he has been a good choice judging by a lack of havoc that could have followed in the financial mar- kets. The .Fed raised rates an additional 100 bps. throughout the year to end up at 5.25%, the highest in five years. With the treasury yield curve now in its sixth month of inversion and showing no signs of. change, we either face an imminent rate cut ,by the Fed, or, lower yields outon the X.axis are just something investors need to become accustomed to. Core inflation had been the culprit of rate increases; which finally peaked in September when CPI hit 2.9%, eventually pulling bade to 2.6%.. Still well above the Fed's 2% comfort range, increases in CPI were largely fueled .by record oil prices reaching a lofty $81+ a barrel in July: 2006 also brought about some significant milestones for Riverside County as well:. In April, the County of Riverside received an upgrade in its credit rating by the Standard & Poor's rating agency, moving from AA- to AA. The triple A rated Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund also hit•a new high point in 2006 by surpassing $5 billion, a new record.- Another double digitincrease in the assessed value of the County over the previous year as well as record tax collections of over $2.5 billion (with • close to 43,000 new parcels added to the roll) has fueled this phenomenal growth. What do the "tea leaves" have in store for investors in 2007? We should see softer. economic growth in 2007; presumably, lower interest rates could help to diminish the effects of•the real estate bubble, although inverted yield curves have preceded recessions about 60%-of the time. Personal . incomes are up 5.9% on a year over year basis and consumers still seem to be spending, as evi denced -by the holiday shopping season. The economy has even absorbed the highest energy prices in history and it seems thus far to be pretty resilient. We mourn the passing of our 38th President Gerald R. Ford,a long time resident of Riverside County, who passed away on December 26, 2006. President Ford also served as Vice President, a' 'United States Congressman as well a Lieutenant Commander in the U.S. Navy. 'He is remembered most. as a man that brought much needed healino to a nation divided, over the war in Vietnam and the Watergate scandal. • . "'Mt Paul McDonnell Durable Goods Orders -for December 22nd . 1.9% actual .vs. 1.3% survey Gross domestic Product (GDP) -for Decem- ber 21st 2.0% actual vs. 2.2% survey Consumer Confidence— Index- December 28th 109.0 actual vs. 102.0 survey Factory Orders -January 4th .9% actual vs.. 1.5% survey. •Employment Situation-- for January.5th Unemployment 4.5% actual vs. 4.5% survey Nonfarm payrolls M/M change 167,000 actual vs.100,000 survey Consumer Price Index- for December 15th. .0% actual vs..2% survey;' core CPI.O% actual vs:.2°% survey At month's end, the Fed Funds rate. was 5.25%, with an inflation risk bias. The 2 year T-Note was yielding 4.82% (up 20 bps.) while the 10 year T-Note was yielding,4.71% (up 25 bps.) For November the Pool had an increase of 5 bps. in the average monthly yield. Portfolio Statistics December November October.. September August July Month -End Book Value Fs - Percent Month=End Market Value of Paper Gain or Loss ;Yield Based Upon Book Value ;Weighted Average Maturity (Yrs) _ :Modified Duration "Market values do not include accrued interest 4,973,386,716 4,967,698,616. 5.01 . 0.78 .. 0.73 4;080,915,202 4,078,187,050 (2,728,152) -0.07% 4.91 0.86 :.................. 0.67 .$ 4,033;662,823 = $ $ 4,028,318,358 $ ._$._ . (5,344,465)7S.... 4.88 0.91 0.72 3,927,455,049 $ 3,920,848,539 $ _.,_. (6,606,510)..1 -0.17%' __.. H_._.... ___..4.811 _ 0.88 ._ 0.701 . 3,981,391;001 i $ 3,979,186,794 1 3,971,398,936 $ 3,965,054,247 f (9,992,065)€ $ (14,132,547)1 0.25%1-0.36%, .......,_..,...xmm.m...:._.._..................,,,..mwx._m_._: 4.75i ' 4.65 ____._..._.._ ._._...._._..___....._... 0.83 .085 `` 0.721 0.751 .:.....::.::..:.....:..::..:..:.....:..:::......,:.G:..:.,...w.....:....:...,..:..........:..:....,...,...::::.........::..5 THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED INVESTMENT FUND IS CURRENTLY RATED: Aaa/MR1 BY MOODY'S INVESTOR SERVICES AAA/V1+ BY FITCH RATINGS 12 1- 2 Years 2 - 3 Years Over 3 Years Total Portfolio Characteristics SECTOR Federal Agency Cash Equivalent & MMF¥ Commercial Paper Negotiable CD's`µ _M . Medium Term Notes Municipal Bonds Certificates .of Deposit Local Agency Obligation; Total",..,._. � �....A....�.d............... m r,..... ,.�...,.x. Market Value 2,671,571,301 101, 000, 000 m -1 274,462,963 M 800,006,605 89,552,400 20000,000» 2,71S,000 .,. 4;967,fi98,fi16s CREDITQUALITY Federal Agency AAA A-1 / P-1 or better N/R Total Market Value 2,671,571,301 157, 942, 748 2, 074, 469, 567 63, 715, 000 '4, 967, 698; 616 MATURITY Market Value 30 days or Less ' 61 1,033,990,324. 30 90 Days _._.__ .....,...__m....m. _:..,...,._..... m._. 1,022,343,451.19 90 Daays - 1 Year; j..1,445,351,612.65 744,073;055.40 697,360;264.05 24,579',908.50 f 4;967,698,616.40 1.98°Ja . 14.0E4+y`o; 30 days 30 - 90 90 Days - 1 - 2 2 - 3 Over 3 . or Less Days 1 Year Years " ' Years Years 12 Month Gross Yield Trends * Treasurer's Institutional Money Market Index (TIMMt) is compiled and reported'by the Riverside County Treasurer's Capital Markets division. It is • a composite index derived `from the aveiage of three multi -billion dollar AAA rated Prime (funds that invest In a diversified portfolio of U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments•including U.S. •Treasuries, government agencies, bankers' acceptances, commercial,paper, certificates of deposits, repurchase agreements, etc.) portfolios that the Treasurer tracks. ,Further details available upon request. Page 1 13 Market Data 12/29/06 11%30/06 DJIA 12,463.20 '. 12,221.93 -S'&P 500 1,418.30 . • 1,409.12 NASDAQ 2,431.77 2,431.77 Crude.0il (barrel) 61.05` 63:13 Gold (ounce). 638.00 652.90 PrimeFRate 8.25% .8.25% 3-Month LIBOR 5:36°% 5.38°% Fed Fund 5.245°% 5.245°% Futures (for 01/07) 12/29/06 11/30/06 Diff,' 3 M 5.02 5.03 -.01 6 M 5.09 5.10 -.01 2 Y 4.82 4.62 .20 5 Y 4.70 4.45 .25 10 Y 4.71 '4.46 '.25 30.Y 4.81 4.56"' .25' .z 3MO 6MO 2YR 5YR • 10YR 30YR Month End Portfolio Holdings -Report IIII CASH - UBOC DEPOSIT ACCOUNT Mcv:Y.c:, w ,. gf.�'c:<::a... 4x..�.ba:. : .•.,.. � :. ._:. " :'3`'.:,r.:'�;`G_'<i''. °�a§''� k'o-�'.^ "::a,_. ' ,aTni ��E;i' �,r;?�,y'ti: xy. 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 4.99 0.08 0.09 CLTRp CAL�TzRUST SHORT TERM FUND 11711 40,000,000.00 " 40,000,000.00 40,000,000.00 5.39 0.08 0.09' I�-jI-k ti - S-tU I-AKM UKtUI I LSANK - 31331SKJ1 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2YrNc6Mo1X 3.27 01/12/2007 5 31331SMY6 10 000 000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2YrNc3Mo 3.52 01/26/2007 10 31331SMEO 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2 25YrNc3M 3.63 04/19/2007 " .5 31331SYD9 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2YrNc 3.75 .05/25/2007 4 31331SYN7 5,000,000.00 .FED FARM CREDIT BANK2YrNc 3.82 06/01/2007 5 31331VCV6 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK1 75YrNc 4.45 06/25/2007 4 31331SR62 10 000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2YrNc3Mo 4.18 07/20/2007 10 31331SMQ3 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2 5YrNc6Mo 3.65 08/10/2007 5 31331SMNO 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2 75YrNc9M 3.70 11/09/2007 5 31331SRM7 6,885,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2.92YrNC3M 4.13 02/14/2008 6 31331XCK6 5,000,000-00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK1.5YrNc3Mo 5-22 05/02/2008 4 31331SXB4 5000�0p0`{000 FED FARM CREDIT BANK3�YrNc3Mo 4.34 05/19/2008 5 � A ����.'u�t. .x'�x'�..�J:":xL::°��4F:: .:.. ��. '�'.,,�, :.a.,�+:�„�' �Rg£:3 ,..r.}:.xd� 5����< , :.. :.:�5: , Tx�,'[3.n'.yk':^✓:. 31331VLG9 8,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 2.4-NC' 4.70 05/23/2008 7 >3'�� .�fF.< �' ���.r : . �ry..,�?$i„�°����i.�l ���E��� £ -a_, 'A^ x� __.✓�_' a� . . .,_757�}�.iSxi. 10,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK3YrNc6Mo 4.44 07/18/2008 10 1r3�1(33y1�SR39 31331SZ63 10 000 000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK3�yYyrNclYr 4.55 08/04/20088 9 � a 31331S4V2 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK3YrN61Yr1X 4.62 09/08/2008 5 31331XES7 7,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIIT}'BANK 2YrNclYr 5.10 11/28/2008 7 _ 31331XCZ3 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK3YrNclYr1X 525 11/13/2009 5 242,750,000.00 242 0 100.00 5,000,000.00 3.27 0.04 0.04 100.00 10,000,000.00 - 3 52 0.07 0.08'. 99.56 4,978 150;00 21 850,00,). :N3.63 .. 0.30 0.130 99.47 4,973 450.00 (22,643.75 3.79 0.40 0.40 ._._ - 99.47 4,973,450.00 (26,550.00) 3.82f 0.41 0.42 99.63 4,981,250.00 17 450.OD 4.47 0.48 0.49 .,gwa ., , v , x :: ..'� 99.41 9,940,600-00 (59400.00) 4.18 0.54 0.56 ..,§� laW .<. 99-06 4,953,150.00 (46,850:00 3.65 0.59 0-61 98.72 4,935,950.00 64 050 00 3.70 0.84. q 0.86 98.84 6,805,409.40 (79,590.60) 4.13 1.07� - 1.13 99:78 4,989,050.00 5.25 1:27 1.34 r(8,750.00) .__ 98.91 �'�- .4,945 300.00 54 700.00 4.34 1.33 1.39 'r�.a"• Spa, rh k a rw 99.44 7,955 040 00 (41,210-0% 4 72 1.33 .1.40 98 91 9,890,600.00 Q09,400.00) -4.44 1.46 1 55_ , r �.F 99.06 9,906 300.00 81 200.00 4.60 1.50 'i 60 �..������Y�4.`.' . _ ,.. ��`�•x 99-09 4,954,70y0�.�0yp0(45,300.00) 4.62 1.59 1.70 .. 99.63 6,973,750:00_._ _ _ 26,250.00),5.10 1.79 192. ill 99.72 4.985,950.00. (14.050.00) 5.25 2.62 2.88 241,356,969.35 (1,326,981.82) 4.41 0.94 0.99 Month End Portfolio Holdings Report • 1-HLG - FHLB - MORTG. CERT. - : 3128X33N1 10 N000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.2YrNc6Mo 3.55 02/01/2007 10,000,000.00 100.00 10 000 000 00 3.55 009 0.09:. q.r. _ . . p 3128x4ce9 5y000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT 1.75YrNc 3.63 02l15l2007 4,994,750.00 99.90 4,994,750y00x 369 0.13 0.13 b, 3128X4AR2 S,000,ODD.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.1.75YrNc3Mo 4.01 02/16/2007 5,000,000.00., 100.00 5,000,000.00 4.01 013 0.13 3128X4G'f�M"7 5,000,000.00 FHLB - CERT.1.SYrNc6Mo '. 4.21 02/22/2007s 000.00 100.00 5,000,000.00 000 000 00 4.21 014 0.15 tcMORTG. ����'�t'��a.k ... ,..,- �u�3i�a��JE'�._4..,%� ": � h5,�0y00 �'!F�..4�T✓,i3}��.`.. '��'o bv�i9����.�`�a`�i'�.:.�:..' ` �.-'.,... a,�f .:'�. 3128X4HQ7 5,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT-1.5YrNc 4.25 02/28/2007 5,000,000.00 100.00 5,000,000.00 4.25 0.17 0.17 3128X2ZB4 .10,000,000.00 FHLB,->MORTG. CERT,3YrNc1Yr1XS 335 03/02/2007 10,000,000.00 100.00 10,000,000.00 2:89 0.17 m0.17 Y` ,- ..,•„ 3128X22F1 10,000 000.00 FHLB - MORTG. rCERT.3Yr�NjclYrSte 3.00 04/05/2007 10,000,000.00 99.45 9 945 �0y0�0 �0��{Qgg (yJ5{5q 000.00 2.49 0 26 ; 0.27 3128X4BC4 5,000 000 00 FHLB yMORTG CERT 1.9YrNc3Mo 4,15 04/25/2007 5.000,000.00 99.69 4,984,600.00 (15,400.00 4.15% 0.32 0.32 ' 3128X46K2 140�,000,000.00. FHLB - MORTG.rCERT.lYrNc3Mo1X 5.25 05/04/2007 100.03 10,002.900.00 2,900.00 5.25 0.344 0.3355 - ,V A10,000,000.00 k� 3128X4g3K5 15,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.13MO-NC3MO 5.25 05/23/2007 15 000 000.00 100.00 15 000 000.00 5.25 ' 0 39 0.40 ��.�,�...4'�. � ��'.'�,�'�':� !��, '•,:a< - . � ,�,.� ..,, „,.r-, "•rsu:�y s^- ,,�py(� C� a ,�y, a •ab ,.:,�.�Yo r .:�c�:y„zw. ,��� ,�.a... .,�>'.,'�t��>���...r .., ,.�. 7�•rc`�5,.. -^z c.,f��:a�,Z�za',x,...ix:�.3;w'R,,,I}%E�n �'.��8m 'Ti"�u``�`,�x 3128X4[y[yW80 000.00 NFHLB , MORTG.. CERT.1.2YrNc�16Mol 5.08 05/29/2007 5,000,000.00 99.98 4,999,150.00 (§50.00 5.08 0.41 0.41 Y55�,,000 Y s T � .e ,.. .:: ,. .. ,w ve 3' ..�..�.. :�`�,�>}GS!7..x�.,MF,,.,,,,.,. R.•e. .#'.. ...... .... ...?1. .,. R.,,...� :' ,,:5. �.. .0 �"��,...e�,w�• 3128X4DG3 10,000,000 00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.2YrNclYr 4.05 42,600.00 06/28/2007 9,985,852.00 4 9 3,252.00 4.12 0.49 99.43 4 0.50 �.d�•d �;,�. : ,. � �.. ,.:. � ' �a(4 3128X4DY4 5,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG CERT.2YrNc6Mo 4.00 07/13/2007 5,000,000.00 99.35 4,967,350.06 32,650 00 4.00 0.52 0:54, 3128X4AT8 5,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG CERT 2 25YrNc1X 4.00 08/10/2007 5,000 000 00 99.26 4 100 00 (36 900 00) 4.00 0.59 0.61 w > �9y63 .6MMIC g, 3128X4GX3 5,000,000.00 FHLBV MORTG. CERT.2YtNc1Yr 4.40 08/22/2007 5,000,000.00 99.42 4,971,100.00 (28�,900.00 4.40 0.62,, 0.65 gFS 1�`�y°.:...'. 7s. .. 3128X4J44 r5,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT 1.5YrNc6Mo 5.02 08/24/2007 5,000,000.00 99.82 4,990,800.00 9,200 DD 5'.02 0 62 0.65 3128X4KE0 5,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.2YrNc6Mo 4-50 09/27/2007 5,000,000.00 99.57 4 978 550 00 21 450.00 4.00 0.72 0.75 3128X4RL7 5,000,000.00 FHLB -MORTG.CERT,2YrNc6MolX„ 4.71 • 10/11/2007 5,000,000,00 99,59 4,979,350,00 (20,650.00) '4.71 0.75 0.78 16 - - Page 4 Month End Portfolio Holdings Report .,. DESCRIPTIOW • •• • :s• , • 31359M2G7 5,000,000.00 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.2YrNc1Yr1X 5.25 11/20/2008 5,001,900.00 99.84 4,992,200.00 , 9,700.00)� 5.21, 1.77 1.90 r.:.. ....in.� ^.. . WNW " 3136F7M38 10,000,000.00 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC 2 5YrNc6Mo 5.81 01/05/2009 10,000 000 00 100.00 10,000,000.00 - 5.81 1.83 2.02 31359ME74 5,000,000.00 'FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.3YrNc1Yr1X 5.00 01/23/2009 Y 5,000,000.00 99.94 4,996,900.00 r3,100:00) 5.00 1.90 2 0 c 31359MF24 5,000,000.00 FED NAT MORTG jAySSOC.3°Y°rN�cyy6Mo 5.08 01/27/2009 4,997 250 00 99.56 4,978 150 00 19 100 00 5F10 7 91 ...... .:..'. .�' .. . �.. .., .s�.,^ �'� ..... .!h{iy��¢�M.Fett��Wi'��'.''�"���5��, '�,"•8•�; , 2.08 3136f7sx6 ^.... ;:> � ; 5,000 000.00 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC 3Nc3mo 7 5.25 02/17/2009 5,000 000 00 99.69 4 984 �4y0y(0j.00 j15,600 00 5.25 .1 96 +' :.:..x"> ��c �n. k 2.14 ..' a 31359MJ79 f..Z ' ;. t 5 .. . . ., , •„ k. w'��i..,i e .:9t .w�<.. ,,...�. .....>i.S�"'S'r�. <" _ s .c, s'"�.,4 ,... �.z`T � law 5,000 000.00 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.3YrNclYr1X 5.30 03/20/2009 5,000,000.00 .0 99.94 4,996,900.00 (3,100 00 5.30 2.05 NOW 2.22 3136F7XS1 5,000 000.00 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.3YrNc6Mo 5.50 04/20/2009 4,996,875.00 99.91 4,99 5,30 0 00 �1,575;00 5.52' 2 12 w.,..j<: '-d'S%a:,.<✓"?, ..�.. g3"t .#.#, 2:3f . 3136F7E37 £ .:3�Ya 'i. ,. �'. 5,000 000 00 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC 3YrNc1Yr1X 5.63 06/29/2009 5 000 000 00 10013 5,006,250.00 6,250.00 5.63 2.30 Fil 2.50 i {i 3i , 10,000,000 00 FED NAT MORTyG ASSOC ,3YrNc6Mo1X_ 5.80 07/yg10/2009 100 00 1�0¢,000,O00.00 5.80 2.26 '' ° 2.53 #3136F7N45 g1,0,000,000.00 � 3136F7599 15,000,000.00 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.3YrNc2Yr1X 5:40 OS/26/2009 15,000,OD0.00 100.22 15,032,850.00 32,850.00 5.40 2.40 2.66 3136F72R7 ._ 5,000 000.00 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC 3YrNc2Yr1X 5.25 09l29/2009 5,000 000.00 100.00 5,000'000.00 5.25 2.50 :�i?zT.�,'�2w:w:,mFAaxw�i'si.•:c'+��i:�S'�s.:Jc�'�d�'d;:r.:�uc:a:✓s'�e;a:.,� r#i:?L3....i 2.75 0 LAV - LVI.AL Alit_rif T Vt%LIGAI IVNJ - - M ,. - 935,000.00 MARCH JPA 5.51 07/15/2012 935,000.00 10000 935 000.00 5.51 4.61 5.55 t. a 2,715,000.00 2,715,000.00 2,715,000.00 5.37 4.77 6.29 MMF - MONEY MARKET FUNC <x. � a:' .. S�Ia�tx°��k1 m ` �'"' �.�� "`� „{����"t :✓ �' i�"" ..bim . n �' �1 �Cd'".'.. f-� °,�),: 6::1" " � . 60,000,000.00 60,000,000.00 60,000,000.00 5.34 0.08 0.09. MTNO - MED TERM NOTES - 74977EMR1 10,000,000.00 RABOBANK Aaa/AAA/AAA 5.14 05/31/2007 10,000,000.00 99.74 9,973,800.00 26 200 00) 5.14 w v < . a.. .. + 4wiiR.'1F..'/:� <'•.<.,.d`k.<,ua's�fk`tf�:i$.5�., 0.41 0.42 ` . t<#;<.;: '. ' . ' :L?d�,. h�.,.tR:7.L.11�..,..a-�xx<r..`ikai.I„4F9?`�W�..�'..?&..�."� :: ". ... e5'St'v.. ' ... ' "3+.' 36962GZZO 5,000 000.00 GE CAP CORP AaalAAA/AAA 4 25 01/15/2008 4,951,800.00 99.09 4,954,500.00 2,700.00 y 4.77 t .. 0.99, 1.05 " �.. _ �Y9O IN 55266LEJ1 10,000,000.00 MBIA GLOBAL FDG Aaa/HAA/AAA w 5.30 04/23/2008 '10 000 000.00 99.70 9,970,100.00 29 900.0.,0 5.30 1.25 1.32 £ .s :n F Y[d'$•<,�,k.a }� xr`'S".ytr .` �'ppyq. �.,� "� .yy. 74977ENS8 5,000,000.00 RABOBANK Aaa/AAA/AAA «_A 5.26 05/06/2008 5,000,000.00 99.79 m 4,989µ550.00 (10,450.00 5.26 1.28 1.35 36962GN34 5,000,000.00 GE CAP CORP Aaa/AAA/AAA 3.77 10/30/2008 4,857 500 00 96.91 4,845,250.00 12,250.00 5.29 1.73 1.84 #-b #�, 1F,¢. �„r•: a����',,vb �' - .r�r< x:. 'ew, s $g ,kL �" 90,000,000.00 $9,758,450.00 89,552,400.00 (206,050.00) 5.18 1.04 1.10 MUNI -.MUNICIPAL BONDS 768903EB8 1,000,000.00 c RIVERSIDE CNTY ASSET Aaa/AAA _ 3.35 06/01/2007 _ 990,340.00 99.21 992,090:00 1,750.00 3,86 �� �S� �� ;: 4 � .�.<Y,.�i7§H".:�' "t!hti�....�..' . ,��" . ". „1RtY;'.`Z7:`�'>wb���`•f...,., �'�'.`�:�ie�A�� -9. K�... 9,a .'Y°'� .3`?0,: "k �:K. . � 130911 E55 2,000 000.00 CSCDA AAA 4.12 08/01/2007 `.2,000 320 00F 99.34 1,986,840.00 13,480 00 4.11 798147ZHO 1,560,000.00 SAN JOSE REVE RF B AAA/Aa6 4.07 08/01/2007 1,560,249.60 99.32 1,549,314.00 (10,935.60) 4.06 0.41 .0.42 0.57 0.59 0.57 0.59 0.52 0.54 8,455,000.00 8,437,266.60 8,390,348.25 (46,918.35) 3.90 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund December 29, 2006 Month End'Portfolio Holdings Report' NCD - NEGOTIABLE CD 90263KAZ1 50,000,000.00 . UBS AG STAMFORD Al+/P1/F1+ 5.34 01/17/2007 50,001,650.98 100.00 ' 60,001,650.98 0.00 5.34 0.05 0.05 0556M2KU5 50,000 000.00 BNP PARIBAS Al+/P1/F1+ 5.30 01/17/2007 50,001,084.64 100.00 50,001,084.64 5.29 0.05 0.05. 50,000,433.48 - 22550AB79" 50,000;000.00 CREDIT'SUISSE Aaa/AAA 5.30 01/29/2007 50,000,433.48 100.00, 06050V7G6 ` 50,000,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA AaaIAAA 5.3�08/2007 50,000 000 00 100 00 '' - 50;000,000.00 :: 5.31, : 0 17:. 0.17 ,,.. ,w .. < �..�.� 78010FSS0 50,000;000.00 RBS GREENWICH CAPITACA1+/P7 5.2�9 , 03/14/2007 50,000,000.00 100.00 '•; 50,000,000.00 5.29 . •0.20 0.21 78009HF87 50,000,000.00 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA A1+/P1 5.31 04/02/2007 50;000,000.00 100.00 :. 50 000 000.00 - 5.31 0.25 •0 26 .. . 74977FEG1 50,000 000{v{O.00. RABOBANK Al'+//Pl/F1+e � , , _ '. 5.27 05/09/2007 50,000 000 00 100.00 50,00000.00 ." •'• 5.27 0.35 0.36 ' 0673P1VG6 50 000 000.00 BARCLAYS CAPITAL Al+/PVF1+ , 5.32 05/23/2007 50,000,000.00 100.00 50,000,000.60 5.32 0.39 ':_ ". 0.40 800,000,000.00 800,006,597.13. 800,006,604.63 7.50 .. 5.29 0.18 0.19 TCD - TIME DEPOSITS ..,, .. i. . ems•. .. . ..Awp.��W.`..>��1��4.�ii:s<YiiDA. 3ws xa:Fb°i 10,000,000.00 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 5.13 04/06/2007 000,000.00 100.00 10,000,000.00 5.13.- 0.26 0 27 10 ,. 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,00U.00 - , 5A6 0.23 0.24 -. TOTAL ' 4,997,750,000.00 4,973,386,715.74 4,067,698,61640 ,'(5,688,009.34) 5.01 0.73 '' 0.78 . 1. The market value and yield of short-term money market securities are based on purchase price. _ l 2. Average life is the number of years until principal is returned at maturity, weighted by market value. - 3. Local Agency Obligations have variable tale coupons, spread to Pool. " .. 4. Modified Duration. The percentage price change of a securiy for a given change. - - The higher the modified duration of a security, the higher the risk. 19 . - .. Page 7 Summary of Authorized Investments The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund was in FULL COMPLIANCE with the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy. The County's Investment Policy is more restrictive than the California Government Code. This policy is reviewed annually by the County's Investment Oversight Committee and approved by the County Board of Supervisors. Projected Cash Flow The Pooled Investment Fund cash flow requirements are based upon a 12 month historical cash flow model... Based upon projected cash receipts and matu- rating investments, there are sufficient Funds to meet future cash flow disbursements over the next 12 months. 12/2006 51.2 02/2007 618.0 806.3 (188.3) 188.3 - 382.1 04/2007 1,505.7 738.5 ' 767.2 767.2 252.0 �.. _r :. .� :;�,k a�'�%� >.:�'r+�^ � e .: nt.: . ���4..b�w''.«' �'�f�`e fr`4a- s''� „>.'^ "`3� ? i ,t � � .�, X'•,a--�5��»„ �r . �ro'<', `. �-,: .�.:..""�:n>,.&.��.».Y.fx.rgca,.a'.n'�".':".*"_'.'^:xra�.M.�.,�.u,>,� . > ;., ra x.,�.,.•„ -.x„ :, `." .� u .. ..,. ate. i�„ z . .,. >,. r, � ,.. .c„�,� ., .�. � .. ..> 06/2007 755.6 885.2 (129.6) 100.4 141.0 e . R. kg�' °��'. k��°�°dS, G � '�;.�. � x � o, cd, �. <! "Yr Es9�f�jL6ti `..n .0 � f�;.:r:��.�LXL°.w'�0`N'.' ` �: i2 .`?e�>�»��•�+¢;�' '„ ,�1 3 `: ,. ..' RY^.Y ,' .; . FK".ww..n^_,,,:%xa§t? - <.r> .. '!..:�i!.£Z. ;.: � k,,.0 .2 ..,w .6 .6'.�w'o-bf k�3:n3d '. eew �X'o.. i -n .�� b' � � L. 'A.° .' „'.' » . �' .�.. „.•% .• , � Ripxi'.*�> °' : : 08/2007 755.2 843.9 (88.7) 88.7 - 104.6 a< o Y,y�'�ia sb; "� .' �X•` x s. �; � 4° .& r � . :� � � ..�. ^a�"9.s,.:,> , A;ax1,`9,t� � ":� +,"S"` �€.' � 4. s, ',,:. k 10/2007 831.4 795.4 36.0 36.0 56.0 .. .x,d'�.:rw.yF;: ii$� �..: ; �1 :r:?s:%AR^�,�'-;�. �'�,;.u:;,:�,�,'m`.b«.'s"Ya. �#ffi,°"4> ..,�>-.,•• "� .f;>Y 12/2007 740.5 694.1 46.4 128.8 79.0 Totals 9,322.8 10,370.8 (1,048.0) 1,059.3 3,526.7 3,908.4 21.32% 70.99% 78.68°/a OR THIS COMPLETES HE REPORTREQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 53646 Page 3 � sw.;..ao,a? n U AGENDA ITEM 7 • • • • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION OMMISS/ON DATE: February 26, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee Mark Massman, Bechtel Project Manager FROM: Karl Sauer, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH:: 'Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Award: of Amendment No. 2, .Agreement No.' 02-31-009=02 to SC SUBJECT: Engineering to Provide. Additional - Engineering and Environmental Studies for Proposed .. Improvements. to State Route 91, from Adams. Street to he 60/91,/121.5 Interchange STAFF RECOMMENDA T/ON: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the award of, Amendment 'No. 2, Agreement No. 02=31-009- 02 to SC Engineering to provide additional engineering, and environmental studies required to finalize- the Project Report, Environmental Document and Geometric Approval Drawings for the proposed improvements to State Route (-SR) 91, from Adams Street to the: 60/91 /1215 . Interchange, for a total amendment amount of $280,977; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to legal counsels review, to execute the amendment- on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action::. BACKGROUND /NFORMA T/ON: At its January 1,2, 200.0. meeting, the Commission committed to support the widening of SR-91 between Mary and Seventh Streets, in the city of Riverside by adding one high occupancy vehicle (HOV):lane in each direction (Project). At that time, the estimated project cost was $170.7 million: At the November 8, 2000 meeting, the Commission'- approved $20.0 million. of .Transportation Congestion - Relief Program (TCRP) and $15.0 million -of Regional Improvement 'Program (RIP) funds for the Project. z The preliminary phase. of the Project was proposed to be funded with a portion of the $20.0. million of TCRP, funds. To expedite this project,,. Caltrans and . the Commission agreed that the Commission be the lead agency and contract out for consultant services to provide preliminary engineering and environmental studies for the Project. 22 At the July 2001 Commission meeting, the Commission authorized the award, of . Agreement No. �02-31-009 to' "SC Engineering- for a total amount of $1,274,430- to provide Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Studies for.,the Project. At the end of 2004, Caltrans was. nearing completion of. the SR-91 .,Auxiliary Lane - Project, from Tyler Ave to Madison Ave, in the city of Ri:verside..This project; added auxiliary Lanes to 'SR-91 and modified �'the termination point of the --eastbound HOV lane near Mary Street. To the east, Caltrans was finalizing...the design for the improvements to. the 60/91 /1215 Interchange, Project. The -original: scope of the SC Engineering Agreement did' not . :extend all the , way, to the ongoing, Caltrans improvements for the ° Auxiliary Lane Project .'. or . the 60191 /1215 Interchange Improvement Project. Therefore, at the January 2005' Commission !.meeting, -staff recommended ' and the Commission authorized the award of Amendment No.' 1, Agreement No. 05-31-533, , to SC Engineering for- a total amendment arriount of ` $306,216 for additional engineering and environmental studies ' required for.. the extended Project limits. The work on this Project has been ongoing and is currently, scheduled to': -.be completed by Fate summer of 2007. However, during the course of the.work, there : have been several new environmental and -engineering requirements; which., were not ,included im the original scope of the work and could not have been anticipated. This 'additional. environmental and engineering scope, and respective cost of $180,977, is outlined in the attached SC Engineering letter. dated February 5, 20.07.. Staff has reviewed and concurs with the attached SC Engineering scope, and cost proposal: With `this agenda item, staff is recommending that the Committee recommend the award of Amendment No: 2, Agreement No. 02-3.1-009-02 ,to, SC Engineering- to provide additional engineering and: environmental studies required ,,to finalize the Project Report, Environmental Document and Geometric Approval. Drawings, for, the proposed improvements to SR-91, from Adams 'Street to the 60/91 %1215 Interchange., fora an amendment amount of $180,977 plus: $.100,000 in ..contingent y• This .will bring the total not to:=exceed project cost for both the original ,contract -and Amendments No. 1 . and No. ,':2 to $1,,861,623. _ Even .though this `:project � is not recommended for CMIA bond .funding in the draft recommendations; staff ' also recommends . including an additional -$100,000 as contingency for'` the ,project to.. assure completion. of; the environmental phase. Staff recommends. the additional funds as an extra measure to assure that unanticipated issues- that- may come, up Will be addressed. 23 • • U Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 20063/01 Amount: $280,977 Source of Funds: Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) Budget Adjustment: Yes GLA No.: 222 31 81101 P3005 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 2/26/07 Attachments: SR-91 HOV Project Scope and Cost dated February 5, 2007. 24 TRANSPORTATION —TRAFFIC -- ViviL ENGiNEERfNG PROJECTICONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT November 16, 2006 ' (Revised February 5, 2007) Route 91 from Adams Street to the 60/215. Interchange HOV Widening SC File!91 HOV-01-01 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attention: Mr. Karl Sauer . Project Coordinator Subject: Amendment'No.2. Additional Environmental and Design Services Dear Mr. Sauer: Itemized rbelow is a detailed description, of additional items that were not anticipated �to be performed in the original scope of work: 1. Additional services, outlined below, required to revise the environmental technical studies and Environmental Document due to responses to Caltrans comments dated October 5, 2006, additional Caltrans Reviews, and the time extension of the project. These services were not included in the original scope of,work and budget. SCOPE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES A. Additional Project Environmental Items (LSA and Associates) a) Environmental Project Management/Meetings Previous. Addendum covered project management and meetings through September 30, 2006. The current Addendum covers project management and meetings for an extended project schedule from October 1, `2006, through .August 31, 2007i the estimated date for FHWA approval of the -Finding of No. Significant. Impact LSA's attendance up to six Project 'Development Team meetings or other meetings is. covered by this Addendum. At the direction of Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC), LSA will attend additional meetings on a time -and -materials basis. b) Eliminated/Deleted Item. c) Revisions to the DraftlS/EA.to Address UpdatedTechnicalStudies and Changes to Project Design - This -task includes revisions to the Draft IS/EA to address: updated "Air Quality. Analysis (with PM 2.5 and MSAT analyses), revised Noise Analysis (with `soundwall at the Christian Day School), updated traffic data provided by SC Engineering, and changes in the project design such as those at the Pachappa UPRR overhead.. . This task also includes additional services by LSA cultural staff to determine cultural requirements to address upgrading the *Christian Day School for noise abatement purposes. Services include researching.the age and historic status of the school building, conducting a site visit that includes a visual survey of the building, and coordinating with Caltrans cultural staff. As a result"of the decision to provide a soundwall at the school instead of upgrading the building, unanticipated revisions to the Draft. IS/EA are -required'. d) Revised Air Quality Analysis', Including MSAT Analysis - LSA` will prepare a mobile source air toxics (MSAT) analysis for the proposed project using the Federal HighwayAdministration's (FHWA) Interim Guidance on Air `Toxic Analysis in NEPA Documents (Fe.bruary, 3, 2006)::- The results of the MSAT analysis will be incorporated into the -Air Quality Technical, analysis, and the updated Air Quality Analysis will be submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. Once the final Air Quality Analysis,-", including the MSAT. analysis, -has been approved by Caltrans, LSA will incorporate those results into. the Environmental Assessment/initial Study (EA/IS). sse��. Szwin :ar_ t4z 9iafaoxtat(on Azzie, U� t4z �tntand'.unsa��rrz�fxz c.-xtd;�� �t.. Headquarter 14890 Seventh Street, Unit B /ictorvi A.92392 760-955-7712 O-.9 ,5-6130-FAX November 16, .2006 Mr. Karl Sauer, Project Coordinator (Updated February 5, 2007) Riverside County Transportation Commission Page 2 of 3 e) Christian Day School — Abatement of Interior Noise Levels - Per the October .5, 2006, comments on. the ,Draft EA/IS, comment number 79, Caltrans has reopened the Noise .Analysis .thatwas approved on 17ecember 14, 2005. LSA completed the Noise Analysis per the- original scope -and budget .(see the April 2002 Agreement for Consulting Services, Exhibit A, .Statement of Services, Task C,:2; b) and perthe.Noise Analysis scope and budget in LSA's September. 20, 2004, Change Order Request No. 5. Additional. services, not included in the authorized Noise Analysis scope and budget, are ' now required to, address Caltrans comment number 79 regarding the validity (reasonableness) _ of the proposed'soundwall at`the Christian Day School. The,school requested, that: be provided: at the south side of their property. RCTC , has agreed to .. construct thewall; therefore, the reasonableness of the soundwall is no longer a concern. Based!, on the'school's. request to provide a soundwall and RCTC's 'agreement to construct the wall,: ,Caltrans final decision .'is 'that noise abatement at the school will be accomplished by construction: of a soundwall. Caltrans has requested that the Noise. Analysis be updated to address construction of the soundwall at the school: This task -includes coordinating with SC Engineering and Caltrans,. conducting interior noise ,..,monitoring. (at Caltrans request) at the Christian Day School on October 25. 2006, revising the Noise Analysis #o address the soundwall, and resubmitting the Noise Analysis for Caltrans- review and approval. 2.. 'Level of Service .(LOS) Analysis - Per Caltrahs most current review of the Geometric Approval Drawings (GADs) and Draft ,Project Report (DPR), Caltrans and RCTC agreed that an local street/ramp intersection LOS ' analysis -would , be required .for existing (2002) and design year. . 2030 for all feasible alternatives (Alternative 1 (No Build), Alternative 2, and Alternative 3 (Locally Preferred Alternative )):.Because the project . was ,an. HOV extension (gap closure) project, a local street/ramp intersection LOS analysis is not typically required, but, because minor improvements were being proposed at the ramp intersection, it was concurred that a:local'street/ramp intersection LOS be performed. In addition, in -order to demonstrate improvements to the mainline freeway, Caltrans and,.RCTC agreed to further breakdown the LOS of the freeway mainline by developing-- Volume/Capacity. for the, freeway segment instead of :passenger cars/kilometer/lane. " The J61lowirigi services -were not included in the original scope of work and budget. A. Level of Service (LOS). Analysis a) Local Street Intersection -LOS - As request of Caltrans Design, Oversight, prepared a. Traffic . Intersection LOS Analysisjor existing (2002) and projected year, 2030 for Alternative 1,(No Build), Alternative 'Z and Alternative, 3. (Locally Preferred Alternative)' for the following 'locations. The -LOS was not original required or included in the Scope of Work since theProject was an extension of the. HOV. > Madison Street Eastbound Ramp Intersection > . Central -Avenue Ramp Intersections. > 14th� Street Ramp Intersections the including Vine Street, Alternative > ; 9t". Street and 10th Street Westbound Ramp- Intersections-.,:.., . `b) . Volume/Capacity (V/C) Freeway Mainline LOS - Prepare a:V/C LOS Analysis for existing (2002) and projected year 2030 for Alternative 1 (No Build), Alterna.i,v 2, and: Alternative: 3 (Locally Preferred Alternative) for the following locations mainline segments: > Madison Street,to Arlington Avenue > Arlington Avenue to Central Avenue > Central Avenue to 14"' Street > -141h Street to Mission.Inn/University Avenue 26 November 16, 2006 Mr. Karl Sauer, Project Coordinator (Updated February 5, 2007) Riverside County Transportation Commission Page 3 of 3 B. Geometric Approval Drawings- As a result of updated'standards (May 2006 and .November/December 2006), in the Highway Design Manual resulted in,various design features to be updated to meet current standards. In addition, previously agreed to non-standard design features were deemed non acceptable for current Caltrans staff. Due to updated revisions impacted the following project features: a) Extend/Reconstruct the Madison Avenue Eastbound .Entrance Ramp to eliminate non-standard gore slopes. b) Re -Strip Arlington- Avenue to the Westbound Entrance Ramp to provide for dual left "turn lanes to increase storage and improve the LOS of the intersection. c) Re=Design Arlington Ave Eastbound Entrance Ramp to improve;the ramp deceleration length. d) Re -Design .Eastbound Arlington Ave -to .Central Ave Auxiliary Lanes to eliminate -weaving distance from the eastbound Arlington Ave entrance ramp,to.the mainline freeway. e) Re-Design/Extend -Eastbound Central Ave Exit Ramp to eliminate non-standard gore slopes. f) Re -Design Lime Street/10th Street Westbound Entrance Ramp to provide.for dual left turn lanes to increase storage and improve the LOS of the intersection. g) incorporate English Equivalent at on GADs to .provide for the standard bridge structure width and proper placement of retaining walls. h) Update Pavement Delineation files related to items a) thru g). i) Investigate Riverside Avenue/Westbound Exit. Ramp .Separation to 'eliminate potential ,traffic. conflicts between the scissor ramp intersection. j) Develop Existing Freeway Mainline Freeway Profile/Superelevation Diagrams to determine if any non-standard features existing on the mainline freeway. k): Develop Design Profile Mainline Freeway Grade Profiles ' (CL Offset and ETW) to determine if any non-standard features will be developed at the freeway/ramp diverge and merge :areas. 1) Update Advisory and Mandatory Design Exceptions to updated Highway Design Manual. m) Update Design Checklist (D1B 82 Updated April 2005 and December 2006) C. Project Report — Updates and. revisions: related 'to inclusion of the LOS for, all viable alternatives, and updates related to the-GADs. a) Project'Report Updates per LOS Analysis. b) Project Report Layout Plan Updates per Geometric_ Approval Drawings Revisions. c) Project Management, Administration, and Project Meetings. - Once again, I. appreciate the opportunity to serve RCTC and assist in. the _process of the approval of the necessary documents and provide a safer transportation facility in. Riverside County. Should'you have` any question, do not hesitate to call me at 760-955-7712. Sincerely, SC ENGINEERING Sal Chavez, PE, Principal/Project Manager cc: Project Files-55 Marlin Feenstra, RCTC - 27 State Route 91, HOV Widening Additional Environmental and Design Services Task; - Estimated No. ' Estimated Estimated Firm Cost of Sheets Hrs/Sheet Hours 1. Additional Project Environmental Items A. Environmental a) Project Management and Meetings 1 88 881. LSA' $13,200 , 0 0 0 LSA $0 c) Revisions to Draft IS/EA due to Updated Technical Studies 1 150 150 : LSA, $15,640 d) Revised Air Quality. &:MSAT 1 40 40 LSA $6,120 e) Christian School Noise Abatement 1 ° '44 44 ' LSA,- '$5,470 eon nn�., oo„���,;.,� 1 0 0" LSA $0 Subtotal 5 322- LSA $39,430 2. Additional Project Development/Design Items A. Level of Service (LOS) Analysis a) Local Street, Intersection LOS Analysis Existing, Alternative 1, 2, & 5 (Year 2002 & 2030) Madison Street Eastbound Ramps 1 32 .32 Sc Central Avenue Interchange 1 48 . `48 SC-,. $4,189 14th Street In (Including Vine Street Alternative) 1 64 64 SC $5,585 9th and 10th:Street Westbound Ramps 1 40. 40 Sc $3',491 b) VolumelCapacity(V/C) Freeway Mainline LOS 1 22 22 SC $1,920 Subtotal ' 206 $97,977 B) Geometric Approval Drawings (Horizontal & Vertical) a) Extend/Reconstruct Madison Ave EB Entrance Ramp 2 24 48; SC $44189 b) Re -Strip Arlington Avenue to WB Entrance Ramp 1 20 20 Sc $1,745 c) Re -Design Arlington Ave EB Entrance Ramp " 2 24 . ;4'8 -" SC $4,189' d) Re -Design EB Arlington Ave to Central Ave, Auxiliary Lanes 2 24 48 Sc $4,189. " e),Re-Design/Extend EB Central Ave Ramp _ 2 '24 48 SC $4;189 f) Re -Design Lime Street/10th Street WB "Entrance Ramp 1 .32 32 'Sc "$2,793 g) Incorporate English"Equivalent at on`GADs 8 ; ;. 1.6 :. 128, SC $11,170 h), Update Pavement Delineation Files 10 18 180 SC ... :$15J08 i) Investigate Riverside AvenueNVB Exit Ramp Separation 3 16` . 48_" SC = $4,189" j) Develop Existing Freeway Profile/Superelevation Diagrams .10 10 100 SC ` $8,727 k) Develop Freeway 'Design Profile Grade Profiles (CL Offset and 10 24. ;` . '240 SC $20,944 1)Update Advisory and Mandatory Design: Exceptions 1 84 84 SC $7,330 m) Update Design Checklist (D1B 82) 1 40. 40 . SC $3,491, _ Subtotal 1;064 $92,852 C) Project Report a) Project Report Update per LOS Analysis 1 88 88'. SC $7,679 b) Project.Report Layout Plan Update per GADs 12' 12 " , . 144 Sc ' ` $12,566 c) Project Management/Administration/Project Meetings 1 120. ` . " " 120 , Sc ..-$10,472 Subtotal 352 $30,718 Subtotal ° 1622 r $141,547 TOTAL 1;'944 " $180,977 :1 State Route 91, HOV Widening Additional Environmentat and Design Services COMPANY: SCOPE OF WORK DATE REVISION SC ENGINEERING Additional Environmental and Design Items November 16, 2006 'February 5, 2007 PROJECT: MILESTONElPHASE/PROJECT SUMMARY: State Route 91, Adams Street to the Route 60/215 IC SUMMARY DIRECT LABOR Sal Chavez Project Manager 163 $ 50.00 $8;150' Carl Sosa Senior Engineer 324 $ 44.50 $14,418 Vacant Civil Engineer 0 $ - $0 John Davis Civil Engineer 422 $ .35.00 $14,770 Frank Ramirez CADD Operator/Technician 470 $ 23.00 $10,810 Mayola Galvez CADD Operator(fechnician 243 $ 18.00 $4,374 Vacant Landscape Architect 0 $ - $0 Carol Chavez Project Controls 0 $ 20.00 $0 $52,522 ., TOTAL HOURS 1,6221 1,622 MULTIPLIERS ESCALATION'@ ( RATE) GENERAL/ADMINISTRATIVE @ 116.57% (of Total Direct Labor + Escalation) $ 61,224.90 PAYROLL ADDITIVES @ 28.43% (of Total Direct Labor + Escalation) $ 14,932.00 145.000 TOTAL MULTIPLIERS $76,157 OTHER DIRECT COST .y. Reproduction Cost 1 0 LS $0 $0 TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES1. OUTSIDE SERVICES (w/o fee) �o.&<:k%Rz:�4.a.&:u:s?`s �'_ t'o t� '�...�'•�,�.£z€: 'F "r�:y <�.c .<..a q. .c<&.•b;.a:.'.. .rF H"c..si '. a .r :o-k x'%" )<.!:F•9.o-.o- �,..."_...�.. ".,.r ��'�.,�"� �)' S`' .si bXx� 3N. f i I: y'i�Li$ s` .:R �j N: ..:..�. .. .. .. 0.... R.R.: Y a; �S4.?'�. ... e4o-.. n.. . .E.vq'?pYS"eY*yw�fir Y 3,d?�'R.{"`:SC.F>.:Vy.�b�� H3�: Y�A� ... 'x:�3•YF ,...�$�"...,..Ss wYY�� A�.� 'S�... .Eo-..c LSA & ASSOCIATES $39,430 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS $0 GROUP DELTA $0 TYLIN INTERNATIONAL $0 AEI-CASC $0 ADM $0 $39,430 TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES , FEES SC ENGINEERING @ 10% (of Total Direct Labor + Total Multipliers) $ 12,867.89 TOTAL MULTIPLIERS $12,868 SUBTOTAL COS $180,977 EXCESS BUDGET1$0 TOTAL COST $180,977 Budget Addendum_02_11.09.2006R3 _ 29 LSA ASSOCIATES. INC. BERKELEY FORT COLLINS RIVERSIDE 20 EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE 200 949.5 5 3.0666 TEL CARLSBAD PALM SPRINGS ROCKLIN 4 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 949.553.8076 FAX COI.MA POINT RICHMOND SAN LUIS OBISPO January 22, 2007 Mr. Sal Chavez SC Engineering 14318 California Avenue, Suite-] 04 Victorville, CA 92392 Subject: Revised Contract Change Order No. 7 for the,State Route 91 (SR-91),Improvement Project .from Brockton Avenue/Mary Street to the 91 /60/215 Interchan2e in the City of Riverside Dear Mr. Chavez:. This letter addresses Change Order Request No. 7 by LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) for the proposed widening of SR-91; between Adams Street and the 91 /60/215 interchange to accommodate high - occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes (one HOV lane in, each direction) through the,City of Riverside. This budget augment request covers the additional services outlined below including project management and meetings for the extended project schedule from October I, 2006, through August 31, 2007; additional rounds of.Caltrans review and comment; addressing Caltrans June 20, 2006; and October 5, , 2006; comments, on the Draft Environmental Assessment/Initial ,Study (EAIIS); and preparing the mobile source air toxics (MSAT) analysis and updating the Air Quality Analysis .to include it. The following services were not included in the original scope of work and budget (LSA proposal dated April 10, 2002,. and Exhibit D_to the original contract): (I)Contract Change Order No. 'I `(LSA-letter dated August 23, 2002), (2)..Contract Change Order No. 2 (LSA letter dated Ju1y,28, 2003), (3)' Contract Change Order No. 3 (LSA letter dated January 27, 2004), (4) Contract Change Order No.�4 (LSA letter dated June 4, 2004), (5) Contract Change Order No. 5 (LSA letter dated September 20, .2004), or (6) Change Order No. 6 (LSA e-mail dated July 20, 2006). ;SCOPE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES Task l: Project Management and Meetings Change Order No.'5 covered project management and meetings through September 30, 2006. The current Change. Order covers project management and meetings;for an extended project,schedule from October 1, 2006,.through August 31, 2007, the estimated 'date, for FHWA approval of the Finding of - No Significant Impact. LSA's attendance at up to six Project Development Team meetings or other meetings is covered by this Change Order. At the direction of SC Engineering and/or the Riverside . County Transportation Commission (RCTC), LSA will attend additional, meetings on a time -and - materials basis. The cost of these services'is.$'13,200. J0 01/22/07 WASAE2301Correspondence\C07 revised3.doo> :T PLANNING J ENV3()NMENTAL DESIGN LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. • • DELETED TASK Task 2: Responses to Caltrans October 5, 2006, Comments on the Draft EVIS This task addresses services required to respond to Caltrans June 20, 2006, and October.6, 20061 comments (34 comments -and 81 comments, respectively) on the Draft EVIS document submitted to . Caltrans for review on May 5, 2006. After the IS/EA scope and -budget were prepared, Caltrans District 8 began working towards the goal of being awarded full: NEPAoversight through a Programmatic Agreement (PA) with FHWA. The PA would allow District 8 to sign environmental documents for federally funded projects,with FHWA oversight.. While this is a positive step forward by Caltrans,"in streamlining, the.result on the SR-91 IS/EA was an intense level of review and comment.. by Caltrans District 8 that wasn't anticipated in LSA's scope and budget for the IS/EA. The May 2006 Draft EVIS prepared by LSA is'a comprehensive and thorough "document that is commensurate -with the level of effort anticipated by LSA; follows Caltrans guidelines for preparing EVIS documents, and satisfies the requirements of CEQA and NEPA. Responding to these comments will require a substantial work effort that exceeds the level of effort originally scoped by LSA for preparing the Draft EAIIS. The cost of these additional services,Js $15,160. Task 3: Revisions to the Draft IS/EA to Address Updated Technical Studies and Changes in the Project Design This task includes revisions to the Draft"IS/EA to address: updated Air Quality Analysis (with PM 2.5 and MSAT analyses), revised Noise Analysis (with soundwall at the Christian Day School), updated traffic data provided by SC Engineering, and changes in the project design such as those at the Pachappa UPRR overhead. This task also includes additional services by LSA cultural staff to determine cultural requirements.to address upgrading the Christian Day School for noise abatement purposes. Services include researching the age and historic status of the school building, conducting a site visit'that includes a visual survey of.the building, and coordinating with Caltrans cultural staff. As a result of the decision to provide a soundwall at the school instead of upgrading the.building, unanticipated revisions to the Draft IS/EA are required. The cost of theszservices is. $14,380. Task 4: Revised Air Quality Analysis Including MSAT Analysis LSA will prepare a mobile source air toxics (MSAT) analysis for the proposed project using the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Interim Guidance'on Air TbxicAnalysis in 11/EPA Documents (February 3; 2006). The results of the MSAT analysis will be incorporated into the Air Quality Technical analysis, and the updated Air Quality Analysis will -be submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. Once the final Air Quality Analysis, including the MSAT analysis; has been approved by. Caltrans, LSA will incorporate those results into the Environmental Assessment/Initial Study (EVIS). 01/22/070\SAE230\Correspondence\C07 revisedldo©> 31 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. The cost of these services is $50 20. Task 5: Christian Day School — Abatement of Interior Noise Levels Per the October 5,' 2006, comments on the Draft EA11S, comment number 79, Caltrans has reopened the Noise Analysis that was approved on December 14, 2005. LSA completed the Noise Analysis per the original, scope and budget (see the April 2002 Agteement for Consulting Services, Exhibit, A, Statement of Services, Task C 2, b) and per the Noise Analysis Scope, and budget- in,LSA's" September 20, 2004, Change Order Request No. 5. Additional services, not included in the authorized Noise Analysis'scope and budget; are -now -required to address Caltrans comment number .79 regarding the validity (re asonableness)'of the proposed soundwall At the Christian Day- School. The school' requested that a soundwall be provided at the south side of their property. RCTC has agreed to construct the wall; therefore, the reasonableness of:ihe soundwall is no. longer a concern. Based on the school's request to provide a soundwall and RCTC's- agreement to construct the wall, Caltrans final decision is that noise abatement at the.school will ,be; accomplished by construction of a soundwall. Caltrans has requested that the Noise Analysis be updated to address construction of the soundwall at .the school. This task includes coordinating with SC Engineering and Caltrans, conducting interior"noise monitoring (at'Caltrans request) -at the Christian Day School on October 25, 2006, revising the Noise Analysis to address the soundwall, and resubmitting the Noise Analysis -for Caltrans review and approval. The cost of these services is $5,470. DELETED iTEMS _ COMPENSATION AND TERMS These services,will be cornpleted on a time -and -materials basis, with the total cost of.Tasks 1 through , 6 not to exceed $53,330. LSA will not exceed this amount without your prior authorization. This is LSA'"s best estimate of the cost of these environmental services based on our knowledge and understanding of the project at this time'. However, changes in the project, design; the project schedule; or Caltrans, FHWA, or resource agency requirements may result in additional :tasks and associated costs.: When the $57,130 for this change order request is added to the .currently authorized budget of $433,106 (the original budget of $158,980'plus Change'Order Request No..1 for:$25,525; Change Order Request No. 2 for $58,955, Change'Order Request No. 3, fora$14,476, plus ,Change Order Request No. 4 'for,$48,225, Change.drder Request No. 5 for $123,445, and Change:Order Request No. 6 for $3,500, the new.total: budget is $486,436. 32 o 0 0 0 0 V •M,kn• 69 6A M 69 69 69 O H � ' ram'• O V. ' O N O 61) yNg G Cos . 69 � A h i, O �. rA 00 O d coo N M GQ � H G G „may V �10 M 00 ,., 69 rL"i C% 4�A0kn y An O O O 00 i, tj 69 404 ee O .v o . O O 00 o rW y cn. •� V Cz, � O o �. o �: 00-- oM � CA •, I y, 69 O a •ej '� 00 N N OHO . 69 vi oH o;Q, cl En ��.14 d � ,cd a o w •� bh o VI on w 04 Zkn F' COD 0 � ' � Q . � U E-• P4 dr�yy I., M G . N �� N • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTA T/ON ' COMMISSION DATE: February ,26, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee Cathy Bechtel, Project Delivery Director FROM: Mark Massman, Bechtel Project Manager Gustavo Quintero, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Update on. Proposed Amendment `No., 4, Agreement .No. 02-31- 043-04 to CH2M Hill for . the .Performance of Preliminary SUBJECT: Engineering Services for the Preparation of -a Project . Report and Environmental Document for the State. Route:. 79 'Realignment Project STAFF RECOMMENDA T/ON: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive' an update on proposed Amendment No. 4, Agreement- No. 02-31-043-04 to CH2M Hill. for the Realignment of SR-79in the vicinity of. the cities of San Jacinto and. Hemet for the development of a Project - Report and. Environmental Document (PR/ED) (the Project). Staff is currently negotiating the final scope of work, schedule and cost for this Amendment. This information will be included with the full agenda packet for the March 14, 2007 Commission meeting for review and approval; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the February :13,' 2002 Commission meeting, the Commission approved Agreement No. 02=31-043 to CH2M, Hill. The scope of work for this contract included preliminary engineering services for the preparation of a Project Report and Environmental Document for the. State Route 79 Realignment Project. The authorized amount 'for Agreement No. 02-31-043 was $1,994,497 . and the anticipated contract duration was 24 months: At the January, 12, 2005 meeting, the. Commission approved Amendment No..1 for $13,158,654 bringing the total contract value to. $.15,1.53,151 Amendment No. 1 included new tasks to be . completed. that were not contemplated after the completion of the Project Study Report (PSR). -Significant work had been 35. completed between the time of the in; contract award and this first amendrnenfi. We. had reached -agreement with the resource agencies on the final purpose : and need f`or the project, final�`project'`cri. is and alternatives selection,.. which allowed us .to move the, SR-7.9 Realignment Project into a formal Project Report and Environmental Document-(PR/ED) phase. Several public,- information meetings on the project were held during this period. However,' significant work remained - because of the intense development pressure in the project .area and'' the presence Of a sensitive vernal pool , complex along the city,: of Hemet's ` locally preferred alternative alignment. When the technical studies were launched, the resource agencies requested~ that ,additional build alternative(sY be included in the 'environmental document so that severalpaths through each :area would be evaluated: From this request, additional segments .and the Midwestern Alternative (Corridor 2) were added to the project to ..create a more robust suite :of alternatives to broaden.,the .choices�.available in the alternatives . selection'. process and to include several avoidance alternatives to..the sensitive vernal :pool. area.: Amendment No. -2 (Agreement No. 06-31-516) was approved on : September 20, 2005 and authorized $331,100 from contingency to update` aerial; mapping and conduct cultural studies. Amendment No. 2 did not increase the .contract's not to exceed value of $15,1_.53,151. At the March 8, 2006 Commission meeting, the Commission approved Amendment,:.. No. 3 which authorized the use' of $1,807,873 identified as project contingency. ---In addition,, the Commission also approved the reallocation of approved. tasks - in the amount of $1,438,279.• The total relocation of funds ;approve.d' by the Commission for Amendment. No'. -3 . was for $3,246,152. This total did not`' increase', the contract's not to exceed value, of $15,153,151. The project continues. to :conduct the requisite technical: field: studies -,,and work with the .local - land use agencies to 'accommodate anticipated,- development ` After significant work, with the:resource agencies and . with assistance, from _ our local "agency partners, the . Commission was successful in . dropping. The.,` Sanderson which . -''would ��would have created significant, community imcts. ',More a " alternative, p , ;recently, the .city:, of Hemet worked diligently, with staff toaddress the, resource - agencies' concerns about, potential impacts to the,,ve'rnal pool complex,. As 'such, - the City recently removed their preferred alter -native . designation. This decision allows staff to remove the Corridor 3 alignment -(previously.. known as. the Central .','Alignment),, frorn the most sensitive vernal pool ,.areas and puts: the . Commission_ closer to reaching ;agreement on a . least environmentally ` damaging ` practicable alternative. Attachment 1 .depicts the current alignment='alternatives for the project`. 36 • The scope of service that was originally negotiated in Amendment No. 1 must now be adjusted in the proposed Amendment No. 4 to address the final alignments for inclusion in the PR/ED documents. This includes the continuation of required field studies for the Midwestern Alternative (Corridor 2) as well as additional engineering efforts. Due to the significant change in conditions that has occurred since the approved contract/amendments and the present state of the project, staff is currently working with CH2M Hill to update the scope of work for the Commission's review. Additionally staff intends to seek authorization in proposed Amendment No. 4 to continue with the necessary engineering and environmental studies to keep the approval process moving forward. We anticipate this information being completed and ready for review as part of the full agenda for the March 14, 2007 meeting. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2006/07 Amount: $ Source of Funds: TUMF Budget Adjustment: Yes GLA No.: Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: • Attachment: SR 79 Proposed Realignments Map • 31 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE; February 26, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee . FROM: Audit Ad Hoc Committee Theresia Trevino, Chief. Financial Officer °THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2005/06 TDA and .Measure A Audit Results AUDIT AD HOC COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION. This item is for the Committee, to: 1) Receive and file the Transportation Development Act (TDA) - and .Measure A audit results report for the Fiscal Year 2405/06; .and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMA VON: In April 2003, Caporicci & Larson (C&L) was ' selected to perform 'the audits of Riverside- County's .TDA claimants and Measure A recipients, except for the Riverside Transit Agency which elected to select its audit firm. This is the fourth year that C&L.has performed these audits for the Commission; however, it did not perform the audit for the city of .Beaumont. In October 2005, the .city of Beaumont was notified by the Commission to engage an audit firm to perform. ,the financial and compliance: audits of its transit and transportation funds commencing with fiscal year (FY) 2003/04. C&L has completed the . audits of and issued the audit - reports for most of the local governmWents, non-profit agencies, and transit. agencies that received TDA. and Measure A funds. Professional auditing standards require the auditors to communicate to the audit committee, or an equivalent group, to ensure' additional information is provided regarding the scope and results of the audit that may assist in overseeing management's,, financial reporting and disclosure process related to the TDA claimants and Measure A recipients. Such communications related to C&L's responsibilities and approach we're. discussed by Caporicci & Larson. Following are highlights of the presentation of the summary of the audits conducted and related .results: • 39 • . Of the $127,052000 distributed related to Measure A, State Transit Assistance, and Transportation Development Act, $84,494,000, or-'...66.5%, was audited by C&L: This comprised 33 recipients, who received funds for , .transit, local streets and roads, and bicycle and pedestrian project purposes. • $42,540, or 33.5%, was not audited. The majority. of these disbursements were related to TDA planning and administration funds.to agencies, including the Commission. As of February 7, 2007, .33 reports were issued. ' ,ssuande .of two reports was pending approval by the cities of Hemet''nd. Moreno Valley. Fieldwork was substantially completed for one additional: recipients; issuance of this : final :report for Care=A-Van was pending resolution of ,,:open..- items,,; and . completion of quality review procedures. • Findings and observations noted on the attachments were discussed Attached. is the summary of transportation and transit, fund operations. and .related : ... audit ,results fo:r the various types of TDA (Articles 3; . 4, and 8) and Measure A (specialized transit and local . streets and roads) funding. -Each schedule provides information for each claimant and recipient . regarding : the revenues, expenditures/expenses, and change in fund balance/net assets., for the year.endedl. June 30, 2006; ..other financial and compliance information;` summary, of observations and findings; and other information pertaining, to the status or: scope . of work , performed . Attachments: 1) Transportation. Development Act Article '3 Schedule. 2) Transportation Development Act Article 4 Schedule, 3) :. ' Transportation Development Act Article 8 Schedule 4) Measure A Specialized Transit Schedule. 5).. Measure- A Local -..Streets and Roads Schedule and Comments - 40 0 0 N N U m Ch I cM CO 00 00 l� co � N ca •O C r- - N. - It to c? ch.._ . L(j coN m co m m L U O m co O O 00 m O L r_ �T L M 't It lqr 0o p m N Q> co O 00 LO X O U R' 69 6A. M U) N N (V N N N O m U N m co co o w co m m Ca ( a > 4a) m ' a) co c � m Cl O O Ih. N C Q m O O O O d u .O M a Cl 0 0.' '.LO v m (1) U) U E 'C o 0 00 c m co Q_ N N ti N ti CL .0 L O F' >, LLO O N m �. LO N. •M Ln O O O C 0 � C T O •- a) — O CO 00 ti M n Ln cO co a> rn E Co Q N O N O CO I� N 0 C U a c O � m b4 61, 69 . N > N C U (n '. O cu N m cc c rn rn rn. L c .. oLm mca w co L i T @ O co c0 U U 0 V cop 6 b9 eA (9 E m Q ` m . cps vmi . d LO E w c L O C. 0 C C' m N ' a N N .0 p . a% ♦+ O C - ...L.. C � L V1 C m 7 c. a Q m 69 61), 69. X_U N N m w a m. C m m M m C Q Q '. m 0 n cc M ch.. 6) CO M Cl) > _O, 7 m O L O O D U C- L N U o'a ma E co m co co 0 CO 0 CD 0 m m C;. N 7 a a>i m m N C N N co m CO c C L a m CO > t1J a) �, .� p E m m ff3 rfs o m m ca '� = m O p (n m U o o_ E co m U X �' i:+ _ p i p O O' CoL O Vi �. L m 0. Ca -O m U m Y L O- C. m C p p O O M. M p O Cl) co C M' *- L 0 Co m w m 3: Y 4 C C' 0 � Q EH b9 to T U V1 ._ 3 C 'U ( N m N w Q O co a co E L C') I I cf) -m 1 EL tm Q C p Li m r C6 co 00 00 C 'p .r. C_ _ M .. o ^ cn E m a UCD 0 m 5 0 CL Cu a) c c'0 o Efi ER L L cu - (d Cu`►- m CL U L � m 0 p 0 -) 0 C m 00 �F �t N � o M Ln m Lin ' U-) LLO 0 to 7 m 010 U •p w E m m c o E� ) m @.0 rn LO Ln Ln CD `. o Ln UpwCi> m m m m �. u c U Ki - E9 E9 � o(D � y L L a � Y= O .(n o.=•o �ma?m o.� m C O �_ � m C� N a> C4 U L w O t0 U d o v 0) It m 0000 LM . � Ln cum _ m mr� o oa 3 - _ c Wpm o `I m cc m N N V 0 m p O p ..-o L 0 — cp — .�.� N 7 04 64 64 1, 0 m U Cu 0. N N 0 Cu Cu 6q 'd N a> > L cu_ CA N- N _�_ C C U O co V! O m C m _m LL a) '0 m U c. my o. a(°i E m c o cu cmi O C cp �>, a m CC h .0 COL U �U p (n N CM S1 > aa) (D ai c>i � m ami c (D � U p -- m E ca m m co E (*> . :3 > � Y m a. m C6 c = > ii o � CD — X 'a .� � m m E aa) a� v aa) a`) > m C 0 L aci m Q- L) . ..0 C -.m L O m W C O w L 0 L L N Cl) L N> L a O m L C a)w m > IZ � N X - m h L m m cu (� (6' � .0' - L CV 03 coCC /CO�. m j:'0 0. /CD cO @ V O T E - M a>i� Ocm m �°�� '0 '0 c.c w � E LL Il LL p � —I N M Ln CO 00 (n .41 fl- O N CV Cu CD ' c vmi t CD w a a o m c 3 a c Fm Q v) Q (D O .. f0 ... L .. . , 'GO) 3 m 7 . ID . (D: ..00 -It: V In CO N m M O m t` M to N Co- O. ' ' ' Cl)-O O (D N O � (D -m r m n ao au N d• (D r-- e M. C . �.. - -C a0 t` C7 O N M N .(0 m cM (O. (O O O r m V O `t•.. .. N p . �.. LO d- .. O O m'Co O Vr N t. - (D. (D CD ;M r N m r•" r C (O. -: LO M (D M (D r m OD (n r`- ti .O r � OD ti: m 9 N m. -. (O O �: r Cl)N n C, rl - OD - .. OC- .. Z I-- COM .- CoCoe- V C OD -.. N " M V m M c0 M - N N .. C O O >- NO,11 ,. 69 69 40 - ffl, �. -� .r` It co ,--. O, (n m ' m (D ' N M ti (D O (D � m m r m a m .. •ip LL ' •: (n M C) r` N OD O «� .-:.h m m CD r (fl M M m r Cl)(n O N M to � N r- r O O N M' M m (n. r` v' v CO OD .N N - > -- . C J N - M .r` W . m ,00 N IT r- N N N O N Cl) (o N O N .^ m - m Y Y p•, U - CD OD OD V lC) in M tf) O - 1O M M W r. ti. V M N (n r (n (O O In N h m OD M ..m 00 to O d' �. -- 7 p . m - - . U)o M r OD T O (O Cl)Cl v r:' U') CD :c .. .. co I• N to CD m O N O N N (n m -�t N N. Lo .' c o , O to Ca o' ' _ - d C .N E .. 10 . LO C N Co ., Oo .- 'O (D O m 00 (o ocN- ' O O O V C c J ao r r sT r co N O n - O M N 'hh t(7 m O' 'O ' °'' U' -E iA U ' C m 'E•' r C, (n LO m r- (D N' o o O N ti r` O M N r r M r- In r• N �- N (D (D M r m r (D O ao C) r _ E (a CD v C. N a d r- (a ao - r` Cl) cn (» (fl (fl U Q a 3" O.r (h - N (D L ' co N m :LO �, CO CO (D •e .. w. - H (1, _.. ([� (n N O c0 ti (n co co co - O (O O N N r` N m (D O � (D a0 (o N t` m N O N' O, O q m .. -C O m O C ._ m... O0 'M CO r m (-' -m COC)N v to (D co O N o m (M (n -O N m N' O 'm L - . D m - > N O r In m (D .. V .0) -. N r- 'r m- (D r- r-; N �,� O Cc _. L -Q j 'C. C6 M Cl)' N m V' (•o N M h W N M N v� O m - Cl) C. CO. OD (n C ' N' - M O Cl) LO " m r r N (n m V M M .n O O M 00 m oc v '.!: P- OD i o O O o Y C N �.. -E to a U V"�CO - M N 11 (O �. M O CIJO �,d: (O CD OD O.• M .. , N - O (O N OD OD OD N O -m r• N M O: N. . O '.N QJ'. _ E' ... .. O X W cc . G. O r (n .. tmn dam' r r m C y 7 - " Q N U r r T 6 :a C M E m 0. m r. E p. CL O C N G C ... - ' E•.a E - -. (u m O E m coO to U am' p'.7 TL m 67 ' _o "Zm o - W - •� (0 " . W . M m to .. CD (n Orn _ : N 00 OD. O i 1` 'Cl) ,� ' iD ' M m O 61 t• in N v, O r- M � V. e : O. a -O N >O O C A .." 00 m Cr C. P . r. -.. (n C`7 CV '" (O V - '..f� r` O R- .. 00 V r� M N O E w? [7 . a ` p •�` . ''. ,. _ C. M CO . r In co (n LO m• N (D m co(D N N. .- O m V (D O r (n �' O' _ N :* N w -C: CA m •pC N «. a a Q a 7 . 16 ." N m N O N m - m N co to o o m m 06 C) H .. C ,, U..• .m' r m N W O 5: o m 10 o 24ci a m oo T'� ,. .. .. m a _ C m (D a• V) - .. a '.m o c' f6 C5. I.L .m m.. m 3 m w m n m(D 3 m m r (n `. c vy c (D o (D co o m e m o (n c o aNi C m m j m m m �= a > w m o c Y No.v coCV f6 m _ C O` - N C m a C N 0) X O. N _ O O Z Q O m >, T.. C ,.- .m N 3 .m+ y6 U' -, @ m �. �; V) 3. - C •O. C" -0 ' W p pmcp� (n �p '(n �' .... c •7 o o O :� � .N - .:a c c m n c.-- N (o m N �C N. C Q. -•m m a m m m m 'O m C Cj:., tD ..gip ,O 2 (p - c rn CL _ c (n N - m y. ,o 3 U) m m c o (o m c «i a m L c c¢ U a ID cc �..9 axi > R m m o E c o c a c U m O �-a m >, o m c c" �' O m o v m r m U m O. @ :CA w m N 7. F- F- G. E O O N -0 U X .2 N �. O O. LL 3 N-ii C c a> ¢. 7 a 'C (D . ,�. C (` X (O .QC.p' m U -O l`O .m• m.� m. y mt.. N C m. m (` w �' m m OL -y. y E w O> O N m@ to w >.C.� �0•. w Q7: U O O N F- :� O c U w N m n >... • m m N m m m m J (n LL `L..O C m N m'• N `•-' O C N C m N m'.:m� -� m m m a ,.a O N m m (r N Q m C'. Oa C C �.L .O Q.(6 N N N •@ m -= C C) (Nd (�� Q /6"D .: m..��- N, - (a - E N �0O @ m �O C CfnHC9Q'O N c m N �pU �m m E m m :.. Z F- O- p O- O F- O O Z O m I- Z m m Z Z O ':. O F-" . m U m W ¢ LL - O fn O ZI O` ZI . 7 r (`t co Cn " - �' (/)'. . 42 •o 0 N e a) m � N CIO o N U O c0 O CV L - : ca LL o i J N a) E O (Li — c_0 m > w a> a> N " m �. L to >, N.O Co ` ) O O Q O N N Co COD > 0 N �-- N 6 Y.. ' T V a>i c Co �^-+' Q m > O - cy) E w 0')r O-pp *'T LoO OLo (O. CD . N � Lo 0)m 0 cv m .. CL �� > ? O� N.0 'a � O U619. r Lo d' co c c -0 m z'� c0 > m 1 -( CD r, M lqt a)0 O%O ' O O`. 0000 ,tea M cam rnI m N N ch N lc0 00 a) a � N 69 ff3 V, 'a O (6 o 0 U a)i N Q.=_ t t) CIO:3 :4) m -- N c .v, cv > U a) m .0 - O > C: C V 0 Q N '^ O C D w N13 M a oi cc >' Q N p o >, N m 2 a) c L O p o — co L) NT m L. C CIO Q c. -0 M (•� coa) I3 - > L ram+ co E O N L p a) O Q .> m. ti CN m O C co >+ U co =3 O L- N c CIO U �. �N m a C >`3 m L p �- � _ U) C .ca O m O 7F6 O (n c 0-t cn >, i �' -6 00 �.L O O 4) '. .co (a IEn _ Q N fl! C m L a� � � a� c "= '� W.L a) CD co CD O E s �' O O m O a -a m m N -0 = CD Q a� � > `� ca ca c0 a) O ao C' X.� .aQ a E N.. C o a> c O c a a) ...' -a -0 . L : a) �— �- - W LL LL (A (n .. 43 ti O C) N r 04 N V .. C Q O - Q 0 N O O N N m m Q N O O 1� � O 000 O ILa oC L .. C 64 U> 64 64 C m NCD co I- 'O r' O »r p cp N � d Q (13 c c U O a> O �-0 �' N Q U 00 �i o co N o co a o . C Z m 64 b4 64 64 cc C:a_ m y .. C. N Q N C C Cl) '- Q Q Q N p Q Z Z Z n F U Q z m 6ekcu ui o Q ao o ° O �wc - ao 0 p C O O ca 1* 00 M N CM cV O O cl > x t LL 64 64 64 69 N N •CD '. C - ..; . O C - o' co_ ., . M co cc _ ' r M M 3 ar o y p : 0000 � N CV a) C N U' }- Z c- OI-z r ti O 7 '0 .2 U C) OT T C) Cl) r r C GCD CD ' Of t .� 0 ' 64 64 64 64 64 C' m = p y N O li7 '., ui O Ln 1� N ' Cl) O CO Q N � •- CO 0) 'N N M r N T r- r O. O M N cc N O ?i °y ;N u) Em Ef3.. 63 64 64 69 L U O - - 0) Q C co tp ' M . N" ' N ' Ln U m Q. Q W U -00. cOo_ «� _ O � '� co co co 3 cc o m" a 2 U) L. C Q �:: C C C r � c'M M 00 T N p L N m N �' �' N J Cl) M M It V7 CD a co CL la. - N U7 C)l: d d d r`' i C)Nt O_ In N :Y A a X- CD � I � o� o c a - co C CS- co CM co . co ;t U) CO 00 r a .� C o CL t (D ... r T N N .: ' T M .0) m U F- cv H.. of > .. - , Cp) 64 64 64 64 64 C :Ecaw L • cn ca .E .. N �. ` T ci a a co c a> Q cc .- $ . . E L N CD ` 7 ea O C cQ ��.o N N t �.�.� CL m - 'N c .N- c� . . ` C Q cm. � K o o 'fn D m -'CA. m c6 - .. a> mom' alma m a'`'m y m 3 . EL ai m = N •m _co TD' . I� N (a.'C o � '� Cc j m o 0 C C ( Q C: j O' C 61 p' N �' C O O w .0 C p. co ca E'CL C 0) o E m 'm N ,. �•N N N .. fa C Q m a U v� - _ _ C L a� N 0) O W., Co. (M N C--. � m a) c N O E E. LL ,: V Q a� N O Q m w N m- m• o y U c 1_m a n N O N .0 S�...0 O a+ C '.'C ., (6 fa Co..:.- > Qy-. N - '" •O «• •� `: � O p :4- 'O _ p °N , Ci m O O co `3. C.. y, y W 0' ca 0' N, LL V:.. Z .:.� > f O CL a a) y o m E a)m a) 76 a) ca (a . C ca Co ca + O ° U U w N a) E v� m .- O H H U Z Z 0 2i Q 2 co Z Z (0 - N M. v ''tn 44 �.Cl)o '. na0o ti o' ON civ0M M 00 CD 00 0)M N 1 I yV., C4 LO r M p 00 OOti co OMON .- O(O N -Co - r r (7) 69 N r M i O M N LO N I I a) o r ..U) Lo co 00L0O N OMU co � i O O (D N 00 ' r-00 LO U.) N M 1 I N N N (O 00 1 ccC�(Nv ONovw 0)0)rn moo' LL r r` CV ISM CM M r c'7 Ln 00 O q:t (C) 0') r r 00 LO M ' C 1 00 e- ti Imo. t` r CA 4) Q v LO N N N LO ti I I M Q) M I I I• I 1 0) O N N -Ia I 1 C ti .. ( CON LL °�°. w MN„ N N� co 0) = - - 1 +r l69 3 1 OI O CO Cl) ., CO I i I I co � 00 LO Ul �.: tiv oOO o o o �, L- t i `mI (D CD LO M cM�. M`T° 1 W I = r N r- r O LO CD 1 N N e- r r M �' .. _ ?1 d3 (fl 1 1 M N00M rOO ,tCO(N Mqv �. Lf) CO CD O m CO 1,-N LO N O. I- LO M (") a)O ­r LO N M (0 00 M 'qT M (d LO LO LO CV LO 'ct N r c} F 1 o Ln O)C.0r CDcOc0 Nrnt-o c=co ' I O d O CV 00 00 (0 . d .. 00 O 'd ct (� LO ('7 00 cr) �i - 00 N c0 C) . I I I 00 (0 CO LO ' II- N (2) � .� ( (D M Ln LO r rn M M rl rl- rn- ti � , I, O rN O ON U) CC) O . U CV N r r to LO r 1 o r p f 1 m Z � ql ' LO r 0 {) ' ' ' ' O p� ' N M G M LO co L0 cO N O O � LO OD rn v c r 0cr(0 M C)( ti r 1 c CO r O O CA co LO I- m 00 r 0 r r r CO N 0 Q a N CO N lC O O N C t0 N C � O. 'a M C N 3 N, L m O' L t4 y C '� N U)T L p w E: O �- co _ U to 0) > C c c j CA CD O V p to N a) O -_�p Q- N A. C O J m - E E C Q N Lo N �, CO O C c0 N C Q a) E c N >. L 7 O CO �+ O O fC M R > O m N N., C N N O f0 L L� 00 N a O -p V C) J Q N. 0) . " N > .`r Q� .O.cOa: [pC C «� N C 0 c m N N N to O.m j > W ci U OC:C.cu N O W 1— 1—O` W a LL U_ 2 45 1 1 I r r N 1 Nam' r' r 00 Or0,M r Ov r O I� I,- 'IT 00 M ti r M ti O O p �f C") N LO 00 C CO M M N N U1 O cn t t- 1 0 M cm co 1- M LO LO co m M M N 1 I Z LO N 00 r r CO N M W LO CN N MM r r co C 69 69 69 6R 613� 69 1 1 1 ' r r r r r O r- r r m O It N M CO O �. ILO N NOOO N O Itt 00 lO f� Q Z01- i I MMM cM 0ON'd U) M Z 0606 .: , N N 7 7 00 Q I i 69 6f3 . 69 EA EA z O , r r �. N .. r r i r r. N .- 1. 1 m M 00 cM O 00 N O N I I > L6 Oa O LO Ln (06 LO N N 1: 10 M. co M O m cM M N � ti Ln N I� O 1 r.O N g 69 69 69 69 69 1 1 CD (D r i r r CO N N r r r r N r () C o �r 1 i � N 1 c N r (' w r- I� M M M 0) M C) M 00 1- 0) y 00. J 69 69 Ef} K3 63 '69 fl 1 r, .i r r vLO MON r r r LO r �0, U1 M N O t- CO O M r 00 �, M� - -- �roo_' O .. yco _ L I CD 1-: o rn cfl N, ++I N 00 M NCO NMv CO O 3 W 1 411 1 _ : 04 CD 1 J di E fl Efl 64 Efl E9 I.. I . ca' CD ti M CM I� CO M ti C 00 CO r � CO I-- � � cf) +- - 1 1 O 1 1 ( 00 CV � 00 C �t . •00 V LO O C OO C'M CN N 69 69 69 69 69 N r r cM I-- LO It l 1 E N�oao P.: ZZ p p' I, I 00 LO 00 Ln N r r Ln Z cv 69 69 Efi 69 r r 1 1 o 1 1 a, co co co co CO C 00 04 �g m '• • ' I - i H9 ,' EH 6Fi 69 6F3 69 �.' . 3 O ` , V Q U y O O 0 N s_ p . = NU (a COOJ 000 p C 8L Q �' N N N N (N j +y+ 3 0) 0) 4) 0 O O N L 'C 4)0) Q' .- "a O to U p 0 fC . Q 0 i C C N , ode C.., � � ] V C - V / V L 0). O LC � U ++ fC J} C 0. O -o"16 a u3 N N U �. N co .0 U L 0 O O O O .0 -0 M C m • O 0) U C U.. :. U (0 0) 0) N 0) (o f CU W d O J O) N..� _ .Z C .N -0 .. c0 _0 O N :L ;a) . N N' p N C c4 C (6 .- O p N N N (A N c -' 7 O C Q? D U hO- Li 10— , Z Q 46 O O N r N N I I M '. ' N Lo O r r, r_ r r O L j ' 00 cM �O O O� N t") MM 1 �. LO o � LO 1 co N N V - v Lo C'M _ r N O rn ti N CO M r" cV r` - h i r r r I �- Co CO O O r- d` co d O LO O Lo �_ r Lo f M W d C r< O r O O rl- O V' r- O r-N� to Ln•- �MCO �I�C � v v ti tiM --r`M 601 d 1 �.I N r r i t M, i r i r r r M r O N I` cvcl _ O N M Ln L N(O' cc) �� t V O M N `° �' rl-... t' 1 O O rn co l 169 t " .t CO. r r U-) M Co O r r r i r O r. I-*O .0') r` O N N CM 00 N N M CN N M �- 00 T ICU a) 'tVD,c N . t6 N(L O� r' N` f691 r 1 to r r r N O O' ' ' LO CO M. '. CO O U cM OON O M N 0 O ��L, � LO (oM qI .. 1 ti ti p eM- i cli CY) N N qI LO C) .' r COI - CO N r ..r r OONr ' OO C co (0 1 rI_ O 0 LO U .- 4 In LOCI) v_ CNtoLnNN �-co LO � � C14N N LO N rr O ti 6 tD � �t to r. r r r LO r ' M N o I a) CO a T N I- LO 1 o0) r N �- C,I to�OMD_ 0~OM LO am• •:. (Da) 'IT (D Co CN (0 d y t to 1 CN M N 1 �1 I• (0 r r -O CO �t co ' ' ' v) co q* M M ` M 1 i 00 N fM co t-- NCM COO 000 tM QMj oO0 r�C IQ L r•M s_ 00 0 • M �- . Mco N 1 a M r (D v_ ONO M r N cli M M. N m O. N V a Q to to c� N R O O N cc O .a th C ` d () cc H 3 O C rn O C EO C N U) w _ L -Q w O - +-+ .� � O L .. -0 U) C fa m .A > 0) j C a V L O tn' to C C C :C O a) E Q IE = O �m tic E'E. N- N (D �� o C a)�� �-0 Q N � U)U (D =3. E 0 C N. E E () N 0 .0 U Q .�_+ U j _ O � a) a) J tNa m N N N a) w� N O EY U) " j 0 ca .� L,. C� a) C a-C a) O C C O Q i a) � .�- (A _0 cu ca C a) (D m C O N N Q) U) Q� 0 O pia QUWC)W0 0 0)).-oC� CD � FO— : W H W" a li ti 47 _ • . o o N - N N . F B I r i r r .r•.M M LO 00 '1 r 1 r' M r .I�, I I CM CV). M O C") CM7 CD CO I I a CY) rn Orn . C'o CM LO N T— M t o I Efl 69 69 V> 69 69 II I.. r i r r r r i r i r I O ti ti M CEO co MM co co M (0°' M ;I � � N �I 69 69 69 69 69 69 _ - 4) sI N r r i r r � r M r N 1 of I OI CM wco 00 C7 OD 0� CO h - o�-rnO ti .- LO co m 00 ti 0 .r a) V M� � °' CN J m m I* N U 1 I 69 69 EA E9 Vy 69 L r r r r r p p CO d C)I _ 00 O co N 00 CA i 00 CD C) _ OO N0O0 O N Ic`+ rti rnti N 69 fi> 69 69 69 tCf - N. , 1 i to m 0 M N U') M O O N U " •. m am rn rn am z LOZ 69 69 69 69 69 Z p r r i r r O O O r r r O O In rn t I. .0 66 C7 CO m O 000 t- co Cn (D co N co N N CO M 00 I 69 69 69 C!3 ER - cowIEfl . -- O co N r r O r C i MO 1 OF a) V O N L coo.- Lp rnLO 1 c ti o 00 v M O B v oo L I a) 00 Oo rl- r- C) � co O O It LO� � v et a) g _> CY) o(d C5v4 0) Lri U) I r e—. N N (N 6R ' 69 69 U) 69 69 . < I .r r I. i � M M It C7) . r r r r cy) 00 'O O 'W . LO� M�< L a) o N < CM M C'M O M ago I - 00 00 T-r ti 00 ti N ID CIO - Cl) O C) m Cn Cn 3 Cn a N N N N r m I' X 69 a1 _ iZ [2 a1CL • • N O tI) O N rn (D colAItMNM 0000C)m, L caMI. - C2 ,,00.:000rn N'NNNN� CA +. ., N •- N m, (1) O O N ,.. .. C: d � Q m {� " c o.' 0 4) M M (n. . >' U W N ,cv w� •tZ a) .. L T v, J} U a) c> it Q >, U c i a) N rLL O A c �, O a) U . - - N CC W 'O 'O. 'Q a: O Cif N X l0 (A Ct; C (D N a) a) tp O - ' W Q' C:) " J 41 2 a) c (D-am '; -p >, CC p, E N Q a u°)i 10 ' 0) N 'coi . m Q O O U t1 a) a) a) '. C �' U) �a) - U O w L o E'er o m Q cn . 48 0 0 N N N 00 1 cf) U-) r N u .. N O r r 00 00 M N 1� 00 1 00 O 00 M (M V r tO 00 v .N 00 CA 1- O) m 00 NT 00 1 C N 30 > C) 1l- 00. CDO 00 00 O)- O) OO ' LO �t 00 Nt:� O 1 0 . M �t 1 + I� CO .. ti ('M r r N (24 o(0. o O(D vo 'a IL AI a) 0) O. O O) OQ 00 N O OO to 00 rr b °''1 5; coon LO �t"n rnv 0; I m 00 O) �j N ti r L_J (fi Efl , 'M O) O) '04 M i M CO in r 10 00 o v N N N. a N 1. CV) o or C 0rn m (0 N oco ICm - 0') co ' M oM N ('M' ('M (M N N 1 69 to 1 U to O 1` co In ' F N CO LO r 1 I rn 1-04M OO) 00 M rr'^ 0000 1 I C O) CO N L o 00 (0. to U-) O r` c N ° 1 l (q m o co v r° O m agM o - 0o (O :T r M� LO O C N N- CO r r '� t0 (fl 1 �f a I. �I E I C N 0 1 (0 (M lqr I I I I I 'tt O) ' M N 0 O I N O ce) LO O) N m M 00 00 00 O (D N Iq LO LO y I - (0 v_ (0 OI �. V N N coo cl LO Lo CO It 04 1 I 00 N r N N (q N N O? r r r cc 00 LO 1l- 1 I 03 1 I a 1 1 co M (0 N O 1 O CO CO LO 1 1 �O M eM- O mm O� �LiMi co co a Cl CO Um OlO I� r �O co MM Lr)r 1 i. • 1 6s U _m O (S1 CL Q V/ t0 0 N O 'C M (0 - C L 3 - CD N C (LO .. may.+ 4) ' _ C C. N to (0 (D �+ i 0 O C .. � ID v O L C p c N 0) C_ O O) C >, V s_ N _N C C .� Id E C Q 0 t�4 E E ,� c(s C ..- N N c am) Q a) a) to 0) 0 C C f0 U) j, E .Q a) E.0 (0 (0 (�Q >. N Q) N N 0) U N. O N v= U U J CCm � ��-� � U) c o').a Q� - o � .� Q L L C. .� co°)cQa.�m - CC m a,M-0 m L c'°: (DN o, Q c�. w U c°)i o c. c coo w OfF°- F°-w a`liti 49 ti C) C) N N N i 1 1 N 00 � 1 1 1 1 N 0 a) 00 00 r (D co ' O 00 Oct 00 C 00 .N 00 00 ti 0000 Q Q L 00 00 0 00 =3> C)O C) CD C)Z Z 1 N Lm 69. 69 6P3 (i9 69 d 00 00 O f` OD r` d Cl) M `. O M C)� v� LO - 69. to (!)� K> to 613 �.' I' 1:i r 1 1 r I 1 r 1 LO .. to N N N M 1 rn rn 0 c�U C L IN.� (N M co co co M com LA N N N N N 69 69 69 69 69 69 I. I (0 CO 1 00 1 1 Ln r co co m I I I r M E c0 O m M O CD (0 M O N O CD N N to CO Ch r `O 06 r cM r IRT 1S) M M M Ch r O d Co �+ (D d E CD v- CD N N r CD �I 69 6q (D w y,, L 1 T 1 �. 1 Q I 1 I 1 .. O 01 N ti o 00 (q cc cO o m10 co M I OI 0) N N L O N -, N oQ C'M N (D N O LO 00 ti N , cu I' I �' d4 (fl Efl 69 EF3 69 I LC) U-) N M r I I 1LO r _ : 1" 1 rn rn N rl- 01) N N N N N 69 69 69 69 K? 69 CL t fU V .r N U C4 O 0 ('V N O C "O(M (D(D cr) 00 OOOOOO (U cU _. '' C2 d. N"N N N N j >1C. ryr ..r O N. N .F; O O N. d 'p in N. (U C L :. O O a p 0,' Cl.: N N C N N. v L Q C: m (U 4) L cu N. N — C •U. [U .� - Q> O O U N (U CU U) C1 L (U 4- J d 0 C cu N Q' •: (U �, U U 'a O a- O -O to 'O to ... N to to C ' a @ M. U CU L N ... L L L L O C O O C) O A N �' O to N Q) N 0 7 to (U '.0-�w-0 N'(U N t3 'O_'O "b .2 4) N (D N O co 4) C O (D U'O- X . (U W - CD.. O UY J' ;.. d (U c p a (U A O N Q p N 2 O . tOis (°n� . Q O N N:N.N.C`� ,= sl U " . O;W ui (U cu O O" O O .. .,E. ', O N" C� f— U— H Z Q U), 50 0 ) f ( LU a)$ & 0 d ® ( § $ 2 \s ®co & .m o �� \ a) } §k Co \f { &�) . .U) 2 � \ Mw 72e. \ b 0 a) } «� ■ CL - )�_ _ ; 2 : ■ . !C0 775. E 4 73 \�\ \� Nye E« /Et § \\� \/ 0) IUD 0 ) 2(k 0 /ok *u (� kCal 0 22 Q \ \ 0 ) \ k R / j \ § i 51 AGENDA ITEM 10 • • f� RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: February 26, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Proposed Policy Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the proposed Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • The initial step in the budget process is to develop policy goals and objectives for the next fiscal year. These goals and objectives are to be consistent with the Commission's overall strategic direction. The goals and objectives for FY 2007/08 reflect the continuation of the transition planning efforts related to the current and new Measure A and the delivery of promises made to the citizens of the County of Riverside. • Using the Commission's guiding principles, staff has updated the attached Goals and Objectives for the Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget. Attachments: 1) Proposed Goals and Objectives for FY 2007/08 Budget 2) Presentation 52 Commission Policy Goals and Objectives The following material outlines the Commission's adopted policy goals, objectives and financial policies that serve as the framework for the work plan presented in the FY 2007/08 - Budget. Mobility Initiatives The Commission, in cooperation with local, state, and federal agencies, will strive to create a transportation system that promotes efficient mobility both within the County and regionally. This effort will increase in its. intensity in FY 2007/08 as a result of the completion in 2006 of a 107year delivery plan program and updated Measure A revenue projections. California voters in 2006 approved Propositions. 1 A and 1 B, which will provide,pa number of opportunities and challenges forthe Commission. The added state funding, along with the ongoing. growth of Measure A revenue; compels the Commission to accelerate projects -and provide transportation improvements throughout the County. The 10-Year Delivery Plan, approved in December 2006, will be an important component in meeting highway needs in Western County, but the Commission will also have to work with. partners including Metrolink, CVAG, and WRCOG to deliver transit services, improve highways and arterials in the Coachella Valley, and ensure rapid investment of TUMF dollars in Western -County. The following are emphasis areas for the Commission in FY2007/08: Maximize the use of innovative financing to support the implementation of the 2009 Measure A 10-Year Delivery Plan. Develop the toll program. consistent with the 2009 .Measure A 10=Year Delivery Plan. • Continue to work with state and federal agencies to program. and construct projects in the STIP, CMIA/bond programs, the Measure A program, and other high priority projects. • Maximize the. effective, application. and .use:. of TUMF .funds- to deliver eligible Commission priority projects and plan for the post-2009 Commission role in TUMF project delivery. • Work closely with local jurisdictions to- -implement the FY 2007-2009 TUMF Regional Arterial Program and facilitate the delivery of arterial.. improvements in Western County. • Continue work on the project level environmental document for the Mid County. Parkway, o.ne of the CETAP corridors. • Initiate geotechnicol field exploration; testing services, and technical`evaluation for the proposed Irvine -Corona Expressway. • Continue next steps on the Riverside County -Orange County CETAP corridor as outlined in the MIS's Locally Preferred Strategy. • Actively participate in the SR-91 Advisory Comrnittee.to facilitate near and long- 53 term improvements to,SR-9`-1; enhance intercounty public transit options.and foster the development of. a new corridor between the two counties. • Advocate';streamlining, efforts at the state and federal levels to facilitate timely project reviews' and approvals. • Coordinate and provide public access to commuter information to foster the ,use of.' alternate modes of transportation such as ridematching for car/vanpooiing, transit , through the provision of a regional trip planner, and real-time traffic information for congestion avoidance. • Continue seeking FTA Small Starts funding to support. the initiation of the Perris Valley Line commuter rail service by 2010. • Continue to develop; a vision of transit service for Riverside .County: Goods Movement - The Commission will work with federal, state, and -local 7overnments to facilitate, the` movement of goods and services to, within, and through the County, recognizing the vital role mobility plays ,in the economic health of the County, the State, and the nation. - • Seek funding 'and local agency concurrence to implement the ' Commission's approved, high -priority railroad grade separation priority list to mitigate the impact of increased, goods movement demands on the transportation. system. . Promote the use of rail corridors (including the Perris Valley Line.'within :funding constraints) as an alternative to trucks for the., movement of .freight within the County and the region. • Work with county transportation commissions, -local jurisdictions, Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA or Metrolink), ..the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the private railroad companies toward the implementation of a`coordinated regional approach to increaserail and highway .capacity for.goods.moveme:nt that includes environmental and community impact: mitigation. Improved System Efficiency The Commission will select projects and, allocate .funds in a, manner that.will improve safety.. and reduce congested traffic --.corridors. Advocate the development, -and use of advanced technologies for transportation applications that are affordable and practical. • Work with `public and private interests to apply real-time technology to disseminate commuter information that will support the use of, alternate modes and improve efficiency ;of the, regional transportation system. • Assure the effectiveness of transit planning through the annual:-SRTP process with,,- a goal toward promoting -program efficiency and effectiveness. 54 • Provide innovative commuter rideshare programs to reduce single occupant vehicle trips and coordinate. with: other regional rideshare service providers to address intercounty commute trips. • Support the deployment of a, SCAG region. 511 system that will make,real=time traffic information available to commuters for. the. -purpose of trip planning and congestion avoidance. • Workwith Caltrans and the California -Highway Patrol (CHP) to continue providing a motorist aid..system which includes a call box program and an FSP program including temporary services in freeway construction zones. Continue development, in partnership. with Caltrans and SANBAG- of the Inland Empire TMC. Environmental Stewardship The Commission will achieve its mobility goals,while promoting environmental stewardship and protecting the area's natural resources and quality of life. • . Continue working with the RCA to implement the MSHCP and to assist in the assembly of the reserve system, with a goal to utilize.the Measure A commitment to the MSHCP as, much as ,possible prior. to the beginning of the 2009 Measure A program.. Work with SCAG, the South Coast Air .Quality Management District (SCAQMD), sub -regional agencies, and local jurisdictions to develop and implement an RTP that meets regional air quality goals and conformity guidelines. Support outreach. and educational programs that promote the benefits of ridesharing, transit, rail, and availability of help through www.CommuteSmart.info, 1-800-COMMUTE, and 511. • Facilitate private/public use of clean fuels technology. Economic Development Transportation decisions will consider the economic benefits derived from any improvement, and, where feasible and practical, will pursue transportation alternatives that enhance or complement economic development. Support local agencies ,in the design and. construction of interchanges that are in proximity to regional economic centers and developments. • Support local projects, consistent with countywide transportation goals, which enhance business development, local employment, and area tourism. • Foster, the development of transportation technology research, education, and training efforts of public institutions within the County. Intermodalism and Accessibility County residents will be served, where economically feasible, through the development of transportation alternatives that consider the needs of a wide range of citizens. 55 • • Financial and Administration Policies Operating Budget Policies • The Commission shall budget no more than one percent (1 %) of Measure A sales -. tax revenue for administrative salaries and benefits: • Administrative program delivery costs. will be budgeted at whatever is reasonable and necessary, but, not to exceed four percent . (4%) of Measure A sales `tax revenues (inclusive of the one -percent salary limitation). • Amounts will be budgeted by fiscal year for multi -year projects based .on best available estimates .with the, understanding that, to the extent actuals vary from those estimates and the project is ongoing, adjustments will be made on an. ongoing basis. • The fiscal capital budget should be consistent with the strategic.plan and deviations appropriately noted, explained, and justified: Revenue Policies • Sales tax revenue projections will be revised semi-annually to ensure use of current and relevant data. Staff may adjust annual amounts to reflect the most current economic trends: • A strategic application of local funding sources will be used to -ma ximize federal .and .state funding of projects. • Fiduciary responsibility regarding TUMF revenues shall be exercised, and revenues will be allocated pursuant to Commission direction and the approved 2009 Measure A. Debt Management Policies • The Commission will maintain 2.Ox debt ratio coverage on all senior debt. • Debt issuance.will be for major capital projects including engineering, construction, and. right of way. Operating requirements must be from current ongoing revenues. • . Costs of issuance including the standard underwriter's discount will not exceed two percent (2%). • While it, is the intent of the Commission to establish -a cash, debt reserve for long term bond- issuance, surety bonds. can be obtained. when beneficial. to the Commission. • .The commercial paper program will provide advance funding for projects included . in the expenditure plan of the approved 2009 Measure A. • The Commission will consider actions to lessen the restriction of, the $500 million 2009 Measure A bonding cap, which could include the possibility, of a ballot measure in 2008 to increase the cap. 57 Auditing, Accounting, and Financial Reporting Policies The Commission will issue a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) in accordance with the GASB Statement 34 financial reporting model. • , An° audit is to be conducted annually on the Commission's accounting books and records. ' '. As long as the Commission has outstanding . bonds" an independent °accounting firm crust conduct the audit. • The Commission"is responsible for ensuring thataudits of Measure A and TDA funding recipients are -completed and reviewed for compliance and other matters in a timely..manner. A.n internal audit, risk assessment program will, be implemented to identify improvements in controls," nd procedures as well as best practices _ Capital Planning and Programming Policies • Established priorities will be reviewed annually with `the Commission'.. Reserve Policies The Commission.will maintain a cash reserve at least equal to five percent (5%) of annual; revenuesJexclusive of reimbursements and matching funds). . • '',The Commission will establish' and maintaina1ransit operator's reserve of ten percent (10%) for the Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. Additionally, a ten percent (10%) reserve will be established and maintained for each of the Western County transit operators (public bus and commuter rail). Cash Manageme;nt/lnvestmdrit Policies • Where possible; the Commissonwill encourage receipt of funds by wire .transfer to its accounts. • Balances in the:' -bank operating account will be maintalned:at the amount necessary to meet monthly expenditures. • Idle funds'will-be invested per the Commission's established' investment policy em hasizin in order of priority: 1 safet 2) liquidity,.and' 3 . ield. _ P g. p Y ) Y� )Y • Cash disbursements ;;,to local jurisdictions -and .vendors/consultants', will ' be completed in an ex'editious and timely manner. Human Resources Management, Policies • Cq"mmission 'staffing levels will be consistent with the intent of its `enabling legislation; whch.envisioned a small; but effective,staff. • Contract staff :and consultants will be. used to augment ,staff efforts as "much as possible to support programs or work loads, which do not :appear... to, be of -a permanent -nature. • Information Technology Policies C� • Significant effort will be made to maintain efficient and cost-effective technology infrastructure by continuously upgrading network equipment and software to ensure quality performance, productivity, and connectivity among staff, other agencies, and the public. Network security will continue to be a top priority to maintain the integrity of the Commission's network and information. 59 a �k v � y� 9 � H ........... 3 9 ......................... k jg4 6k . . . . . . . . . . . ....... ..... k>&=SY lu .. .. um, a. § gym" 60 . . . . . . . . . . . O V / O U U � O U EEO •U O 4-0 �jm 4-a -� . U _J__j 0 61 W V d i.i O O O U _ . ._ .0 t. r0 n AGENDA ITEM 11 n RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRH DATE: February 26, 2007 TO: Budget and Implemer FROM: Jerry Rivera, Prograrr THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy SUBJECT: SB 821 Bicycle and - Cities of Moreno Vall, STAFF RECOMMENDA T/ON: This item is for the.Committee to: 1) Grant the city. of Moreno. Valley an extension to June. 30, 2008 to complete the Pan Am Boulevard and Graham Street sidewalk improvement projects, 2) Grant the city- of San Jacinto an extension to June 30, 2008 to complete the Idyllwild Drive sidewalk improvement project and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMA TION: In FY 2006, the Commission awarded $1,954,798 to fund thirty=three projects as part of its SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program The agencies have until June 30,2007 to. complete the projects. Moreno Valley The city of Moreno Valley -was allocated $45,000 for construction of the Pan .Am Boulevard sidewalk project and $45,000 for the construction ,of the Graham Street sidewalk project. Both of the projects are part of larger CDBG (federal) funded projects which- involved _more complex right of way issues and increasing construction costs. The project design for -the. Pan Am Boulevard sidewalk. project is 95% complete and project construction will - begin in June 2007 with completion anticipated in September 2007. The project design for the Graham Street sidewalk project is 65% complete. After right of' way acquisition, project construction will begin in September 2007 with completion anticipated in December 2007. Therefore, the city is requesting a twelve month extension toJune 30, 2008 to complete, both projects. 66 San Jacinto The city of San Jacinto was allocated $80,000 for construction, `of ' the Idyllwild Drive sidewalk project. The project is part of a larger CDBG funded, street widening project- which requires additional right-of-way. The city has secured most of the dedications and is pending additional dedication or acquisition. through eminent; domain. Therefore, the city is requesting a twelve month extension -to June 30, 20'O8: to complete the project. Attachments:: 1.j Letter. from City of Moreno Valley 2) Letter -from City of San Jacinto • 'ublic Works Department 79244 J R capital Projects City Hall 14177 Frederick Street P.O., Box 88005 Moreno Valley, CA 92552-0805 Telephone: 951 A13.3130 FAX: 951,413.3170 January 19, 2007 Mr. Jerry Rivera, Program Manager JAN 26 2007 Riverside County Transportation Commission RIVERSIDE couNrY 4080 Lemon Street..3�d Floor 1SR4RiATtoN COMMISSION, .P.O. Box 12008 Riverside; CA 92503-220$ Subject: FY 2005-0.6 SB-821; Request for Extension of Time Dear Mr. Rivera: . The City of Moreno Valley is requesting. a; one (1) year extension of time for the following projects funded pursuant to FY 2005-08 SB-821. �. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program: 1) Pan Acn Boulevard from Bay Avenue. to Cottonwood. Avenue: The. SB-821 funded sidewalk improvement'is partof a larger-CDBG. (:Federal) funded project. The larger'project.design.currently is at 95% completion. The project construction Will, begin' in_June 2007 with- completion anticipated in September 2007. 2) Graham Street from Hemlock Avenue to Ironwood Avenue: The SB-821; :.funded sidewalk.. mprQvemer}t :is_.part_.of .a, larger. CDB.G: (F_ederal) .funded :pfaje. .The larger project *design currenily.' is at 65% completion.' It -is ;'anticipated that -after Right of Way acquisition, the project construction will begin in September 2007 with completion m-December 2007. - ` si : • l Therefore, the -City-.Is : respe'qtfully - requesting .- a one .-_(1)- `year. extension of-. time.- to complete the above mentioned projects. ss- U.26 3 • February 5, 2007 Jerry Rivera Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, Ca 92502-2208 RE: FY 2005-06 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Dear Jerry, The City of San Jacinto is requesting a one-year extension of time on its 2005-06.SB 821 Idyllwild Drive Sidewalk Improvements Grant. The request for extension of time is due • to the fact that the San Jacinto City Council has expanded the scope of work of this project to maximize the benefit to the residents and San Jacinto High School, to include street widening. Project funding includes SB 821 and Community Development Grant funds. To implement this project, we are also required to acquire additional right-of-way. I am sure you are aware of the delays associated with implementing a large scale project with multiple funding sources and missing right-of-way. . We appreciate your support of our request. Please feel free to contact me at 951-487- 7342 or 951-943-6504 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer • 70 • AGENDA ITEM 12 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: February. 26, 2007 TO: Budget, and Implementation Committee FROM: John Standiford, Public Affairs Director THROUGH: Eric Haley,, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and federal Legislative Update STAFF RECOMMENDA T/ON: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the state and federal legislative update;' and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Federal Update The beginning of March often heralds . a season of visits .to Washington -by various interest groups. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the Coalition for America's Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC), the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, and the American Public Transit Association (APTA) all have major trips planned sometime during the month. The Commission will be represented by Commissioners and staff during the S.CAG, CAGTC and APTA events. .The focus of both the SCAG. and: APTA gatherings_ is. goods movement and its impact on transportation, the, environment and the nation's economy. Although it might seem like Congress just passed SAFETEA- LU, now is the time to communicate issues of concern for the -next federal authorization bill.. This is especially true with the massive changes in Committee chairmanships that came with new 'Democratic majorities for :each house. In the Senate_, the Environment and Public Works Committee is now chaired by Riverside County resident Barbara. Boxer. Senator Boxer has expressed an interest in being actively involved in goods movement and freight issues as has the new Chairman of the House Transportation, and Infrastructure Committee, James Oberstar. Oberstar has visited Riverside County in the past and will meet with the SCAG delegation during its visit. 71 State Update February 23 marks the legislative deadline for bills to ' be, introduced for this year which is after the, deadline for the writing of this committee staff: report.. Two legislative priorities for the Commission are to seek legislative authorization for design build contracting Joir the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension project .and for authorization ` to pursue High Occupancy Toll Lanes on State : Route 91. and Interstate 15: Staff; will provide additional information on these items .during .the 'Committee' meeting. Since Legislative rules require a bill to be in print for 30 :days: before it can receive `a hearing, much of the "legislative action has centered ,around a proposal to move the state's presidential primary to February and to amend term Ii;mts provisions for legislators. Some Committees have also scheduled inf.orrnationol . hea.rings to delve into specific topics. One notable example is the Senate Transportation and .Housi,ng Committee, which will hold a series 'of meetings. regarding the,,. . implementation. of Proposition 1 B. Executive Director Eric Haley has:been invited to testify at a February 27 hearing on the issue. The hearing will take place the, night before the California Transportation Commission (CTC) is scheduled' to make its. first. allocation decisions on the Corridor Mobility Improvement' Account (CMIA) from;Propo.sition 1 B. • • INK "§ [.' da:' 'Is.G.a4..:. n E N N A`SSw1: W/ .n w.y3.4A<-0 Y/ ........... *,1 WE W NNWAr+ S:4:SS � .., '•3 LV CL 1..1� q3 O O LU U Z3 �w`� c O c O c. p c p IL z ° CL a o " N. �x H a �3z F JIN CO C.0 ♦0 ;= CD W rs ? y d N N O p J " N r- :sr N N r- .Nry W kY?%`> D D LU LL..:.y:: O O O O O O < L L _ci L L L L ap¢¢a W Mrs C p a)� D -ocac C O !EO __ >+� �.� p C a) U C-) LCI O L (6 +� N U a) _ U O c" ErN a •L/` a ' Z lCD vw (D (n IL C W O Qv.`Rco - &F o oc � >��O (c��� �a-C cc I.I . C (>3 U a co L U O a) 6� o°. O O_ . +7, .N fA : U(D(n t (— O a) Co 4�cz 0)a)- C� .- ,^U L - ass<°rv- yi yn L -O U VI (� U E :q aEm. cm o� off° U (n cn� �p c� s�� L cc oco o L �, o c. c -c O rnCO c_ O �mH N CO O -p O :E c °� .L ai (cu c co a) U o 9." ^ ro -C U) rn _ N C C C L o (/� 0 co Q 4— `v �� f `y CDa) n,V CO . •V W U`Lav O •.�I�. CD 41 aU a CD a O 4L L (D E co Nil: o cu m CD - a)(D4 a;O/O c C L a E o> >O � *-OLa Oa� U SEE— I YES D • cu +- o:Eaco / �� `! I- O O (/v- A cu co 0 .'.. aD . i (D E o o oU cn+J s � M. na � �� � m;: a�Q C). �a) ,�co Q E O O U (D�. a) cu O a rM C t 4- E o• O aZ E �- H O -1- O H m (n IZ U O (n -C O a? C O (n I- co Z-0 U cc -C •EQ F- IM .O m O ` 'go W WW o 4. L L a 3. Q .� v W "3 41 'J c C O� a) !� a) a) C Ln U Ln C W m O co m.O co m m CO O m <::;.g. gty.._ia: :�2lifk^.i:f 5 tsW,` �.iFA1M16:: R g�! O f: co s co Al - 4 U) O CL 9' L 95��Sn , e' •?' Ca 4-JW � L Ca oc:OL a is N CL Qi cn "" '•> /` 4-1 Co A J ...:f. O +CO-+ -, i _0 C cu ¢fry: s (Q CO L 'L . a ''o^^' 'Q LL N G) 0, L ++ L O M O L' V- Q 00 cn O _ a b C O O . LO ' ^.. N L W . pA� S 'ONO,M vs ¢f Q N m _ OC c C V �j, y co 4� O •� CD N N O O X b t m QQ. w ��LJ� Ln'� Lo.OLLj " / L