Loading...
04 April 23, 2007 Budget & Implementationt , 80076 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA TIME: 9:30 a.m. DATE: Monday, April 23, 2007 LOCATION: Board Chambers County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 1' Floor Riverside, CA 92501 RECORDS ***COMMITTEE MEMBERS*** Rick Gibbs, Chair / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta Steve Adams, Vice Chair / Dom Betro, City of Riverside Brenda Salas / Barbara Hanna, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / Charles Grotke, City of Blythe Mary Craton / John Zaitz, City of Canyon Lake Gregory S. Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City Eduardo Garcia / Steven Hernandez, City of Coachella Hank Hohenstein / Yvonne Parks, City of Desert Hot Springs Bob Magee / Robert L. Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore Gordon Moller / Alan Seman, City of Rancho Mirage ' Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula John F. Tavaglione, District Two / County of Riverside Jeff Stone, District Three / County of Riverside ***STAFF*** Eric Haley, Executive Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Office ***AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY*** Annual Budget Development and Oversight Countywide Strategic Plan Legislation Measure A Implementation and Capital Programs Public Communications and Outreach Programs Competitive Grant Programs: TEA 21-CMAQ & STP, Transportation Enhancement and SB 821-Bicycle & Pedestrian Property Management SAFE/Freeway Service Patrol TUMF Program and other areas as may be prescribed by the Commission Comments are welcomed by the Committee. if you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please complete and submit a Testimony Card to the Clerk of the Commission. 11.36.06 • • RIVERSIDE . COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be: taken on any item. listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Monday, April 23, 2007. BOARD CHAMBERS County Administrative Center 4080.Lemon Street, lst Floor Riverside, :California ._ In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48•hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS 4. " APPROVAL OF MINUTES - To Be Submitted at Next Meeting 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add .an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item. came to the attention of the . Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Committee. if there are less than 2/3 of the Committee members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous 'vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) Budget and Implementation Committee April 23, 2007 Page 2 • • CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on ` the Consent ,Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Comrnissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 6A. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT Overview This "item is for the Committee to: 1`) ,Receive and file the lnterfund Loan Activity report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2007; and 2) . Forward to the Commission for final action. 6B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Report for the third quarter': ended March 31, 2007; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final. action. AWARD OF AGREEMENTS' TO DONNA DESMOND ASSOCIATES AND DESMOND, MARCELLO & AMSTER FOR ON -CALL GOODWILL VALUATION SERVICES This: item is for the Committee to: 1) Award Agreement. No. 07-33-124-00. to Donna Desmond. Associates' and Agreement No. 07-33-125-00 to Desmond Marcello . & : Amster to perform "On -Call Goodwill Valuation Services; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, Agreements on behalf of the Commission`; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget .and Implementation Committee April 23, 2007 Page 3 8. AWARD OF AGREEMENTS TO LAND AMERICA COMMERCIAL SERVICES, CHICAGO TITLE, AND FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY FOR ON -CALL TITLE AND ESCROW SERVICES Pg. 7 Overview This item is .for the Committee to: 1) Award Agreement No. 07-31 128-00 to Land America Commercial Services; Agreement „ No. 07-31-129-00 to Chicago Title, and Agreement No;.. 07-31-130-00 to First American Title Company to perform Title and Escrow Services; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review; to execute the Agreements on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 9. AWARD OF AGREEMENTS TO CROCKETT & . ASSOCIATES, LTD. AND DESMOND, MARCELLO & AMSTER AND FOR ON -CALL FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT APPRAISAL -SERVICES Overview Pg. 10 This item is for the Committee to: 1) Award Agreement No. 07-33-126-00 to Crockett & Associates, Ltd. and Agreement No. 0•7-33-127-00 to Desmond, Marcello & Amster to perform On -Call Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment, (FF&E) Appraisal Services; . 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the Agreements on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 Overview This item is for the Committee to: Pg. 12 1)Discuss, review and provide guidance on the Proposed Budget for Fiscal. Year (FY) 2007/08; and 2) Forward the Proposed Budget to the Commission to open the public hearing in order to receive input and comments on the Proposed FY 2007/08 Budget on May 9, 2007 and on June 13, 2007 and close the public hearing.. Budget and Implementation Committee April 23, 2007 Page 4 11 RECURRING CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the Recurring Contracts for Fiscal Year 2007/08; and 2) ' Forward to the Commission for final action. Pg. 33 1'2. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 13. Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Grant the city of Lake Elsinore (City). an extension to June 30,. 2008 to complete the Mohr Street, Sumner Avenue and: La Strada Street sidewalk improvement projects; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the .Commission to: Pg. 39 .. 1), Receive and file the state and federal legislative status report; and 2) Forward to the 'Commission for final action ITEMS -PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR.. AGENDA 15. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF: REPORT Overview 1) This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report on attended and upcoming .: meeting/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. Budget and Implementation Committee April 23, 2007 Page 5 16. ADJOURNMENT AND NEXT MEETING The next Budget and Implementation Committee meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 A.M., . Monday, June 25, 2007 Board Chambers, 1st Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. • ATTENDANCE ROSTER BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 23, 2007 9:30 A.M. NAME Rrc K G /eef 4 vc- 1Zo ‘, ‘'rL- 13 & n- REPRESENTING M vA-A/fsr-, 4 �h y 111�= £Eo1.4 TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL # R Gl64J e HaAticrr4 -a �G • AGENDA ITEM 6A • • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: April 23, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Interfund Loan Activity Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Interfund Loan Activity report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2007; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On April 14, 2004 the Commission approved the Interfund Loan Policy and adopted Resolution No. 04-009 "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Authorize Interfund Loans". Subsequently, the Commission requested that the interfund loan activity be reported on a quarterly basis. The attached report includes all interfund loan activity through March 31, 2007. The total outstanding interfund loan amounts as of March 31, 2007 are $400,405. Attachment: Interfund Loan Activity Report • • • Date of Loan April 2, 2003 March 4, 2004 Total Riverside County Transportation Commission Interfund Loan Activity Report For3rd quarter ended March 31,2007 Loan Amount Repayment Amount ' of Loan Begins Outstanding Lending Fund Borrowing Fund Purpose of Loan $ 300,000 July 1, 2006 $ 125,405 Measure A - WC Highway (222) Measure A - WC LSR (227) Advance to make repairs and Improvements to Railroad Canyon Road 275,000 July 1, 2009 $ 575,000 275,000 Measure A - WC Commuter $ 400,405 Assistance (226) Measure A - WC Highway (222) Additional local match for the SR71 Widening/Animal Crossing Project • Date Commission Approved • March 12, 2003 December 10, 2003 VA20071175 MaylBudget & ImplemenlationlMC.Attach.lnterfund Loan AaNlly.vis AGENDA ITEM 6B • • I • • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: April 23, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Single Signature Authority Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1► Receive and file the Single Signature Report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2007; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The attached report details all professional services and administrative contracts that have been executed for the third quarter ended March 31, 2007 under the Single Signature Authority granted to the Executive Director by the Commission. The unused capacity at March 31, 2007 is $361,290. Attachment: Single Signature Authority. Report as of March 31, 2007. CONSULTANT AMOUNT AVAILABLE July 1, 2006 Dudek United Methodist Church & Ca!trans Douglas Wood and Associates SINGLE SIGNATUREHORITY AS OF MARCH 31, 2007 ORIGINAL CONTRACT REMAINING DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT CONTRACT AMOUNT On -Call Environmental Services Professional consulting services for Aranline Hills Land Use Study Amendment # 1 to Agreement #07-62-020 for Transit Vision Conceptual Planning Services Bartel Associates Actuarial Valuation Services AMOUNT USED Less return of remaining contract value due to expiration: AMOUNT USED, net of adjustments AMOUNT REMAINING through March 31, 2007 Towa Reabrol-DeMorst Michele Cisneros CrMelia Consulting Prepared by Reviewed by Note: Shaded area represents new contracts listed In the third quarter. $500,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 31,210.00 30,083.05 1,126.95 26,000.00 31,500.00 138,710.00 138,710.00 $361,290.00 10,004.17 0.00' 40,087.22 15,995.83 31,500.00 98,622.78 • V:12007105 May \Budget & ImplemenlalionlMC.Attach.3rd Olr Single Signature,xle • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: April 23, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Min Saysay, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Cathy. Bechtel, Project Delivery Director SUBJECT: Award of Agreements to Donna Desmond Associates and Desmond, Marcello & Amster for On -Call Goodwill Valuation Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Award ;Agreement No. 07-33-124-00 to Donna Desmond Associates and Agreement No. 07=33-125-00 to Desmond. Marcell° & Amster to perform On -Call` Goodwill Valuation Services; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the Agreements on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On May 10, 2006, the 'Commission approved and directed staff to release a Request for Proposals (RFP) for On -Call Goodwill Valuation Services to support current Commission: projects, and future Measure highway and rail projects. State statues and regulations require that when 'business operations are affected by agency projects, an assessment of probable loss' of goodwill be conducted by the . agency. In order to comply with state requirements, the Commission can either hire staff . or establish a "List of on -call professionals who specialize in valuing goodwill. The Commission decided to establish -a list of on -call goodwillvaluation experts. The Calendar of Events was as follows: Calendar of Events' Distribution of RFP Proposals were delivered to Commission prior to 2 PM Evaluation Committee Review of Proposals Staff Recommendation to Commission March 6, 2007 April 5, 2007 April 10, 2007 May 9, 2007 Selection :Process A selection panel; was assembled, which consisted of representatives from the Commission and Ca!trans. Staff received two proposals.: ` The selection panel reviewed the proposals based on qualifications of the firms, staffing and project ; r organization, work plan, cost and price, and, completeness of response. After review, the .panel determined that both firms submitted good quality proposals and ranked the firms as follows: `Top Ranked Desmond, Marcell° & Amster Second Donna Desmond Associates Dueto the arnount of potential goodwill valuation services required to deliver the SR=91 High Occupancy Vehicle lane, the Perris Valley Line, SR-79 Realignment and the Mid County Parkway projects, staff recommends that agreements be executed with both firms. Cost will be based on firm fixed price per assignment, and the terrn of each .contract is three years with two one-year contract extension options to be exercised . at the sole discretion of the Commission.,work will be, awarded on a rotating basis and assigned in accordance with the firm's ranking. A budget of $350,000 for FY 2007/08 has been included in next fiscal year's proposed budget. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: $350,00.0 Source of Funds: GLA No.: TUMF $30,000 Measure A $240,000 CMAQ $80,000 210-72/73-81.403-P5123 $30,000 221-33-81403-P3800 $160,000 222-31.-81403-P3005 $160,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: 6 Budget Adjustment: Date: AGENDA ITEM 8 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: April'23, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Min Saysay, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: ' Cathy Bechtel, Project Delivery Director SUBJECT: Award of Agreements to Land America . Commercial Services, Chicago. Title, and First American Title Company for On -Call Title and Escrow Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Award Agreement No. 07-31-128-00 to Land America Commercial Services, Agreement No. 07-31-129-00 to Chicago Title, and Agreement No. 07-31-130-00 to First American Title Company to perform Title and Escrow Services; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the Agreements on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On May 10, 2006, the Commission approved and directed staff to release a Request for Proposals (RFP) for On -Call Title sand Escrow Services to support current Commission projects .and future Measure A highway: and rail projects. Title companies will provide preliminary title reports; on all property and property interests to be acquired by the Commission. Preliminary title reports provide the necessary information to ensure that the Commission is acquiring clear title to properties being purchased. Legal owners of the property, liens and encumbrances, as wellas existence of utility easements are some of :the information contained in those reports. Escrow services are necessary to ensure compliance with all conditions of the purchase and sale agreement. The 'Calendar of Events was as follows: Calendar of Events :Distribution of RFP Proposals were delivered to Commission prior to 2 PM Evaluation: Committee Review of Proposals Staff Recommendation to Commission Selection Process March 6, 2007 April .6, 2007 April 10, 2007 May 9, 2007 A selection panel was assembled, which consisted of representatives from the Commission and Caltrans. Staff received three proposals. The selection panel reviewed the proposals based on qualification of the firms, staffing and project organization, work plan, cost and price, and, completeness of . response. After review, ,the panel determined that all three firms submitted good quality proposals, and ranked the firms, as follows: - Top Ranked Chicago Title Second Land America Commercial Services Third First American Title Due to the amount of potential title and escrow services required to deliver- the SR- 91 High; Occupancy Vehicle lane, the Perris Valley Line, SR-79 Realignment and the Mid County Parkway 'projects," staff recommends that, agreements be executed with all three firms: Cost will be based on firm fixed price per assignment, and the term of each contract is three years with two one-year contract extension options to, be exercisedat the sole discretion of the Commission. Work will be awarded on a rotating basis and assigned in accordance with thefirm's ranking. A budget of $396,000 foy FY 2007/08 has been included in next year's proposed budget. 8 • • Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: $396,000 TUMF $36,000 Source of Funds: Measure A $248,400 Budget Adjustment: No CMAQ $111,600 210-72/73-81403-P5123 $36,000 GLA No.: 221-33-81403-P3800 $136,800 222-31-81403-P3005 $187,200 222-31-81403-P3015 $36,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: N it��1,1i,j Date: 4/23/07 9 AGENDA ITEM 9 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: April 23 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Min Saysay, Right of Way Manager THROUGH:: Cathy Bechtel, Project Delivery Director SUBJECT: Award of Agreements to Crockett & Associates, Ltd. and Desmond, Marcello & Amster for On -Call Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment Appraisal Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Award Agreement No. 07-33=126-00 to Crockett & Associates, Ltd. and Agreement No. 07-33-127-00 toDesmond, Marcell° & Amster to perform On -Call Furniture, :Fixtures and , Equipment, (FF&E) Appraisal Services; 2) Authorize ,the Chair; pursuant to legal _counsel review, to execute the Agreements on behalf of the Commission;_ and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On May 10, `2006, the Commission approved and directedstaff to release a Request for 'Proposals (RFP) for ;On -Call Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment Appraisal Services to support current Commission projects and future Measure A projects. Federal and state regulations .require that an appraisal be ordered when the FF&E owned by individuals and businesses being relocated are affected as a result of an agency project: In order to comply .with .:the regulations, the Commission authorized staff to establish a list of on -call FF&E appraisers: 10 The Calendar of Events was as follows: Calendar of Events Distribution of RFP - Proposals were delivered to 'Commission prior to 2 :PM� Evaluation Committee Review of Proposals Staff Recommendation to Commission Selection Process. March 6 2007 :April > 6,: 2007 April,1.0, 2007 May 9, 2007 A selection 'panel was assembled, which consisted of representatives from the Commission and. Caltrans. Staff received three proposals. The selection panel. reviewed the proposals based on qualification of the :firms, staffing and: project organization, workplan, cost and price, and, completeness of response. After review, the panel determined that two firms submitted good quality. proposals and ranked the. firms, as follows: Top Ranked Desmond, Marcello & Amster Second Crockett & Associates, Ltd. Due .to the amount of potential FF&E appraisal services required .to deliver the SR 91 ' High Occupancy Vehicle lane, the Perris Valley Line, SR-79 .Realignment, and the Mid County Parkway projects, staff recommends that agreements be executed with the two firms. Cost will be based on firm fixed price.per assignment; and the term of each , contract is three years with two one-year contract extensionoptions to be exercised at the "sole discretion of the Cornmission. Work will be awarded on a rotating basis and .assigned in accordance with the firm's ranking A budget of $350,000 for FY 2007/08 has been included in ` next fiscal year's proposed budget. In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Financial Information: Year: . FY2007/08 Amount: $350,000 Source of Funds: G'LA No:: TUMF $30,000 Measure A $240,000 CMAQ,;$80,000. 210-72/73-81403=P5123 $30,000 221-33-8,1403-P3800 $160,000 222-31=81403-P3005 $160,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \Pc€4z440_3Ztegyn 11 Budget Adjustment: Date: 4/23/07`. AGENDA ITEM 10 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: April 23, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human': Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Proposed Budget fiscal. Year 2007/08 - STAFF RECOMMENDATION. - This item is for the Committee to:. 1) Discuss, review . and provide guidance on the Proposed Budgetfor Fiscal Year (FY) 2007/08; and 2) Forward the Proposed Budget to the Commission to open the public hearing in order to receive input and. comments on the Proposed FY 2007/08 Budget on May 9, 2007 and on June .13, 2007 and close the public hearing: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Staff has completed , the initial budget preparation process, and attached is an executive summary for :the Proposed Budget for FY 2007/08. The goals and objectives approved by the Commission on March 14, 2007 were the basis of this budget. The goals and objectives considered during the preparation of the budget relate to mobility initiatives, goods movement, improved system efficiency, environmental stewardship, economic development,intermodalism and accessibility, and public and agency communications. Staff will present highlights of significant items included in the budget and is seeking review and input of the Proposed Budget for FY 2007/08. Based on input received from Commissioners, staff will update the document, as necessary, and present the proposed budget for public hearing and for the Commission's review on May 9, 2007. As a result of input received from the public and the Commission, staff will make any necessary changes to the budget document for final review, close of the public hearing, and adoption at the June 13, 2007 Commission meeting. The executive summary document contains a summary.. of all departmental budgets and summarizes ..the information for the entire' Commission. The department budgets present the goals and objectives, the resources needed to accomplish the 12 goals, and the . appropriations required to accomplishthe., tasks. Staff has also included the fund budgets which provide the budgeted revenues and expenditures from a,_fund perspective. It should be noted that the Local .Transportation Fund special revenue fund, which has been an unbudgetedfund in prior years, ;is included as a budgeted fund in the FY 2007/08 budget due to its significance toy the Commission's operations.. At the June 13, 2007. Commission meeting, staff will present the entire .with detailed narratives. A summary of the; Proposed Budget for FY 2007/08 is as follows` Revenues and other financing sources: Sales taxes -Measure A and LTF Reimbursements (federal, state, and other) TUMF State Transit Assistance Other revenues Interest on investments Commercial paper proceeds Transfers in Total revenues and other financing sources Expenditures and other financing uses: Personnel.. salary and fringe benefits Professional' services Support services Projects and operations Capital outlay Debt service (principal, interest and costs of issuance) Transfers out Total expenditures and other financing uses Excess (deficiency) of revenues and . other financing sources over (under) expenditures and other financing uses Beginning fund 'balance Ending fund balance. 243,624,400, 33,127,200 27,250000. 23,263,000 2,947,900 16,678,500 87,000,000 74,688,000 50.8,579,000 Attachment: FY'°2007/0E3 Proposed 'Budget Executive Summary 6,589,400:. 8,370,.300 2,662,200: 472,432,600 942,000 42,225,900 74,688,000 13 Executive Summary • Introduction • • The budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2007/08 is presented to the Board of Commissioners (Board) and the citizens of Riverside County. The budget outlines the projects the Commission plans to complete during the year and appropriates expenditures to accomplish these tasks. The budget also shows' the funding sources and fund balances that will be used to complete these projects. This document will serve as the Commission's monetary guideline. To provide the reader a better understanding of the projects to be completed, staff has included descriptive information regarding each department and major projects. The discussion in each department includes a review of major initiatives and key assumptions. Staff used the goals and objectives approved at the Commission meeting on March 14, 2007, to prepare this budget. In addition to the Commission's long-term goals and strategic plan, the short-term factors listed below were usedtto guide the development of the budget: Operational • Maximize the use of innovative financing strategies to support the implementation of the 2009 Measure A 1.0-Year Delivery Plan. • Develop the toll program consistent with the 2009 Measure A 10-Year Delivery Plan. • Work closely with local jurisdictions to implement the FY 2007-2009 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial Program and facilitate the delivery of arterial improvements in western Riverside County (Western County). • Continue work on the project level environmental document for the Mid County Parkway, one of the Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) corridors. - • Continue the next steps on the Riverside County -Orange County CETAP corridor as outlined in the Major Investment Study's (MIS) Locally Preferred Strategy. • Continue to work with. the Regional Conservation. Authority (RCA) to implement the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and assist in the assembly of the reserve system. • Promote viable goods movement projects for Proposition 1 B Trade Corridor Improvement funding. • Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail Fines serving the County. • Support innovative programs which provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for riders with special transit needs. • Promote program efficiency and harmony between transit operators. • Maintain effective partnerships among commuters, employers, and government to increase the efficiency of our transportation system by encouraging and promoting transportation alternatives. • Continue to provide a motorist aid system that ensures safety and convenience to freeway motorists. • Maintain close communication with Commissioners and educate policy makers on all issues of importance to the Commission. Financial • Maintain administrative program delivery costs below the policy threshold of 4% of Measure A revenues. The current Management Services budget is 2.28% of Measure A revenues. • Maintain administrative salaries and benefits at less than 1 % of Measure A revenues. The current administrative salaries and benefits is .87% of Measure A revenues. • Continue to 'maintain prudent cash reserves to provide some level of insulation for unplanned expenditures. • Maintain current positive bond ratings with rating agencies. • Move forward on Measure A projects for highways and regional arterials using sales tax revenues, TUMF revenues, and state and federal funding .as well as financing alternatives such as commercial paper and innovative financing .strategies. • Look for opportunities, funding sources, and innovative approaches to address transportation needs that extend beyond Measure A. • Leverage and protect past Measure A investments in rail to: obtain state and :federal funding for additional rail improvements, including the Perris Valley. Line , Metrolink extension project (Perris Valley Line). Budget Overview Chart 1 — Revenues: Major Categories Other Revenue 1% TUMF Revenue 8% Intergovernmental 16% Investment Income 5% Total revenues are budgeted at $346,891,000 'which is an increase of 11.4% over FY 2006/07 projected .revenues and a 28.7% increase over the FY 2006/07 budget.. The projected fund balance at June 30, 2007 available for expenditures (excluding reserves for debt service of $31 648,000 and loans receivable of $3,470,200) is $435,920,000 Total funding sources available for the FY 2007/08 budget, including commercial paper proceeds of $87,000,000, amount to $869,811,000. • • Chart 2 - Commission Revenue Trend` $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 s- FY 06/07 FISCAL YEARS FY 07108 ®Investment Income. III Other Revenue OTUMF Revenue O Intergovernmental ■ LTF Sales Tax IS Measure A Sales Tax The State Board of,. Equalization has provided cities and other agencies its projections for statewide taxable sales over the ; next fiscal year to increase 4.9%. Additionally in May 2006, the UCLA Anderson Forecast completed a long. run forecast of taxable sales revenues for. Riverside County to determine projected Measure A revenues through 2039. For FY 2007/08, UCLA estimated an increase of 5.2% :in sales tax receipts. Riverside County continues to :experience moderate growth 'due to the population and jobs increase due to the relatively affordable housing in the. County compared, to Southern California coastal areas; however, the County has experienced a slowdown in the housing market. After taking these economic factors and the state of the local economy into consideration, staff has projected a 4.1 % increase in Measure A sales tax revenues compared to the prior year budget. On behalf of the County; the Commission administers the LTF for public transportation needs, local streets and roads, and bicycle and .pedestrian facilities. The majority. of LTF funding receivedby the County and available forallocation is distributedto all :transit operators in the County; andfl the Commission receives allocations for administration, planning, and programming in addition to funding for: rail :operations included in the commuter rail Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). In prior years, the LTF special revenue fund, which accounts for the majority of LTF funding, was an unbudgeted fund; however, due to its significance to the Commission's operations, it: is a budgeted fund commencing with the .FY 2007/08 budget. The LTF sales tax revenue is budgeted based on the LTF sales tax revenue projections, .which are projected to increase 4% over the FY 2006/07 estimate. Intergovernmental revenues include STA transit allocations' :and federal, state, and local reimbursement revenues: STA funds are generated from the statewide sales tax on motor vehicle fuel and are allocated by formula by the State Controller to the Commission for allocations to the County's public transit operators. In FY 2006/07, the State Controller's Office significantly increased its STA projections for FY 2006/07 and FY 2007/08 as a result of the restoration of Proposition 42 funding, prepayment of general fund loans, and gas sales tax spillover. 16 The STA transit allocation` budgeted for FY 2007/08 reflects a 24.6% increase over FY 2006/07. Reimbursement revenues are expected to increase 40.2% compared to the prior year budget; however, only 11.2%° of the prior year budget amount is projected to be realized as revenue in FY 2006/07 as a result of specific capital project activities. The decrease in,: FY 2006/07 ' projected revenues is primarily related to federal reimbursements for project development of certain capital projects that has been rebudgeted in FY .2007/08.: For FY 2007/08, federal sources will partially fund rail capital projects ° including the .Perris Valley Line,: Perris multimodal facility, and North . Main Corona station: parking structure and highway capital projects including the SR-79 realignment stud and .the SR-91 Green' River. 9 y� P P1 9 g y , Road .interchange. Additionally, federal funds are supporting the geotechnical studies related to the Riverside County -Orange County CETAP corridor. State funds will reimburse a portion of the costs on the North Main Corona station parking structure and Perris multimodal facility in addition to planning and programming . activities and Motorist Assistance services': 'Federal and state reimbursements also pertain to various Commuter Assistance programs. As a result of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU),with ,the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the Commission will ° receive approximately 48% of TUMF through June'30 2009, and, in accordance with the 2009 Measure _A; thereafter: at 100%, after deduction of an administrative fee, up to .an aggregate of $4.00 .million.. TUMF represents fees assessed on new residential and commercial development, in Western County. FY 2007/08 TUMF fees are expected to decrease 35.1% .compared to the FY 2006/07 budgeted revenue based on a softening of the housing market. Other revenue consists of miscellaneous revenues and is projected to increase 52.5% from the. prior years budget primarily as a result of a TUMF contribution for the Perris multimodal facility; .. however, other revenue reflects a 52% decrease from projected FY 2006/07 revenues as a_ result of the proceeds received from sales of properties in FY 2006/07.. Investment income is anticipated to increase .33.3% in FY 2007/08 .as a result of higher cash" and investment balances die to. unexpended;1989 Measure A and:.TDA funds, the issuance of commercial paper, and continued higher yields on investments. Staff continues. to actively manage its resources and make appropriate investments to maximize the return to the Commission without sacrificing security and affecting short-term cash ,requirements. Table 1 Revenues FY 2005- 2008 FY,04l05 FY 05106 FY 06107 FY.06/07 FY 07108 ,Dollar Percent Actual Actual Revised Budget Projected ' Budget' Change Change Measure A Sales Tax LTF Sales Tax Intergovernmental TUMF Revenue Other Revenue. investment Income TOTAL Revenues 138,921,300 $ 157,236,300 $ 159,150,000 $ 159,150,000 $ 165,600,000. $ 6,450,000' 4.1% 74,469,800 85,134,900 11,344,200 ''85.268,100 78,024,400 66,680,200 587.8% 30,131,000 11,786,700 42,686,800 22 634,800 56,390,200 13,703,400 ` 32.1 % 46.325,300 85,228,400 42,000,000 30,100,000 27,250,000 (14,750,000) ' 35.1 % 3,118,000 13,503,900 1,932,500 6,144,300 2,947,900 1,015,400 52.5% 5.146.300 11.639.700 12.509.000 8.017.100 16.678 500 4.169.500 33,3% 298.111.700,. $ 364.529.900 269.622.500 $ 311.314.30Q ' $ '346.891:000 $ 77.268.500 28.7% 17 • • Chart 3 - Expenditures: Major Categories ` Regional Issues 0% Management Services 1% Debt Service 8% Regional Arterials- Coachella Valley 3% Local Streets and Roads 12% . Planning and Programming Rail 2% 2% Right of Way Management 0% Capital Highway, Regional Arterial, Rail 52% Specialized Transit 1% Transit 17% Commuter Assistance 1% Motorist Assistance 1% Total expenditures are budgeted at $533,222,400, an increase of 28.2% from the prior year budget amount of $41 fi, 022 600: Programexpenditures totaling: $485 411 200 represent 91.0% of total budgeted expenditures in FY 2007/08. Program costs have increased 30.6% from $371,640,500 in FY 2006/07. This .increase is primarily due ° to the inclusion of the LTF special revenue fund as a budgeted fund commencing in FY 2007/08 and an 8.4% increase in the Capital Highway, Regional Arterial and Rail programs. Significant highway projects include SR-79 realignment and Mid County Parkway right of way acquisition and engineering, SR-91 High Occupancy. Toll (HOT) lanes engineering, and SR-91 La Sierra. interchange improvements construction. Additionally, as : a result of the commercial paper program, advance funding for projects included in the 2009 Measure A may begin, including land acquisition for the. MSHCP in Western. County and Coachella Valley. Approved regional . arterial projects will be in various phasesof engineering, construction, and right of way. Right of way acquisition and preliminary engineering for the Perris Valley .:Line as well as the completion of engineering and commencement of construction of the North Main Corona station parking structure will be significant rail capital projects in FY 2007/08. Debt Service of $42,225,900 has increased slightly as a result of the issuance of additional commercial paper. 18 Management Services expenditures of $5,585,300 have increased 16.3% compared to ;the FY 2006/07 budget as a result of increased capital outlay and support costs related to the. increased staff as well.: as commercial paper administration fees related to the increasein outstanding commercial. paPer. Table 2 -.Program Expenditures FY 2005-2008 FY 04/05 FY 05/06 Actual Actual FY 06/07 FY 06/07 FY 07108 Dollar. _ Revised Budget Projected Budget . Change Percent Change. Management Services $ 3,260,200 $ 4,016,000 $ 4,804,100 • $ 4,749,700 $ ' ;5,585,300 $ , 781,200 16.3%; Regional Issues 67,900 106,900 539,500 367,500 749,100 209,600 38.9%> Planning and Programming 2,331,000 3,110,100 6,829,400 ; 2,459,900 8,323,500 1,494,100 ; 21.9% Rail 5,330,400 7,786,600 8,238,000 7,687,100 9,034,100 796100. 9.7% Right of Way Management 580,200 622,500 1,125,600 366,400: 1,162,500 36,900 3.354, Specialized Transit 4,875,300 5,003,900 7,815,100 6,462,500•. 6,323,500 (1,491,600); 1,9.1%' Transit 54,668,300 61,844,000 7,172,000 69,716,500 92.833,800'. 85,661,800 1194.4% Commuter Assistance 2,643,700 3,119,900 6,273,100 3,193,800. 6,450,300 177,200. 2.8% Motorist Assistance 2,19.1,000 2,280,400 3,712,900 2,466,200 4,968,000 1,255,100 33.8% Capital Highway,Regional Arterial; Rail 59,314.600' _ 52,523,600 256,420,200 . 138,367,400 278.053,300 21,633,1W 8.49'. Local Streets and Roads 53,330,700 60,386,800 59,493,300 59,493,300 61,959,500 2,466,200 . .. 4.1% Regional'Arterials -Coachella Valley - 10,053,700 10,350,500 14,021,400 11,374,200 " `15,553,600 ; , 1,532,200 10.9% Debt Service 38.208.800 36.584.500 39.578,000 37.001.100 42.225 900 2.647.QW 6.7% TOTAL $ 236.855 80g $ 247 735 700 $ 416 n22 60Q $ 343.705:600 $ 533 222 400 $117.199:80Q 213.2% Note: Management Services include Executive Management, Administration, Legislative Affairs and. Communications, and Finance. Commission Personnel The Commission's salary and fringe benefits total $6,589,400 for FY 2007/08. This represents an increase of 32.7% or $1,625,100 over the FY 2006/07 budget 6f $4,964,300. The Commission has set aside a pool of 5% for salary increases in FY 2007/08. Additional personnel costs are related to the January 2007 and February . 2007 ` approvals by the . Commission's Executive Committee to add 13 new staff positions through. FY,2007/08. , The Full Time Equivalent (FTE) has increased by 13.0 FTE positions from. the prior year, for a total of 44.0 FTE positions. Fringe benefit increases also include the funding of postretirement health benefit costs. Table 3 - Staff Summary by Department FY 2005-2008 FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FY 06/07" FY 07/08 FTE FTE FTE` FTE Executive Management 1.3 1.4 1.4' 1.5 Administration 4.1- 4.6 4.7 4.9 Legislative Affairs and Communications 1.3 2.6 2.6 2.7 Finance 5.5 5.5 5.5 ' 6.2 Regional Issues 0.3 .0.6 0.6..... 2.2: Planning and Programming 3.9 4.4 4.2 4.9 Rail - 2.4 3.0 1.9`. 2.4, Right of Way Management 0.8 1.8 2.0 ...1 2 . ;Specialized Transit 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.8 Transit 1.2 1.7 1.5 1.8 Commuter Assistance 2.4 2.1 1.5` 14` Motorist. Assistance 0.8 0.7 09 1.4 Capital Project' Development and Delivery 1_8 2.9 3.8 12.6 TOTAL 26.0 32.0: 31.0... 44.0 19 • • • Department Initiatives The preparation of each department's budget was based on key assumptions, accomplishments in FY 2006/07, major initiatives for FY 2007/08, and department goals and related objectives. Following are the key initiatives and summary of expenditures for each department. Executive Management • Continue project development and delivery as the key Measure A priority. • Explore creative financing opportunities due to the impact of the State's general fund and budgetary issues on transportation funding. • Maintain regional cooperation and collaboration as a significant effort consistent with the philosophy and mission of the Commission. • Continue to expand communications with media, business, and civic groups. • Maintain public education efforts regarding the growing transportation financing needs of the Commission's prbjecis and prograrns. • Maintain and improve administrative efficiency and fiscally sound practices. • Strengthen staff training and development to enhance skills, productivity, and value. Table 4 - Executive Management Program FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 Dollar Percent Costs Actual Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 204,300 $ 266,000 $ 275,900 $ 284,800 $ 263,700 $ (12,200) -4.4% Professional 114,300 84,100 65,000 45,000 80,000 15,000 23.1% Support 60,800 58,200 63,600 46,300 32,600 (31,000) -48.7% TOTAL $ 379,400 $ 408,300 $ 404,500 $ 376,100 $ 376,300 $ (28,202) -7.0% Administration • Provide high quality support to the Commission and to internal and external customers. • Continue to strengthen the electronic records management system to improve the Commission's recordkeeping capabilities. • Continue efforts to support staff regarding the DBE prograrn for federally funded capital construction projects. • Continue to provide timely communications to Commissioners with continued emphasis on the utilization of electronic mail. • Continue to update technology to streamline processes and provide easier access to Commission records. • Support and develop a motivated workforce with a framework of activities and practices that are in compliance with employment laws and regulations. 20 Table 5 - Administration Program Costs Personnel Professional Support Capital Outlay Debt Service . TOTAL FY 04/05 Actual FY 05/06 FY 06/07 Actual Revised Budget $ 362,400 $ 459,200 $ 85,500 108,400 925,300 945,700 119,800 54,000 31.400 _ 31,400 $1.524.400 $ 1.598.700 484,000 75,500 1,198,600 100,000 26,200 1.884.300 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 Dollar Percent, Projected Budget $ 368,400 $ 454,700 $ 71,900 97,200 1,465,200 1,375,200 40,000 322,000 26.200 $ 1.971.700 $ 2.249.10Q' $ • Change Change Legislative Affairs and Communications •. Continue ; efforts to seek greater state and federal investment in infrastructure. Advocate positions in the State Legislature and Congress thatadvance the County's transportation. interests. • Continue 'to develop a broad public information program regarding` the Commission's responsibilities and accomplishments through a variety of media formats: • Continue to place an emphasis on providing communications support related to major project development efforts. • Provide new Commissioner orientation meetings and other continuing education opportunities for Commissioners. (29,300) 6.1 % 21,700 ; 28.7% 176,600 ~ 14.7% 222,000 222.0% (26200) 100.0% 364800 19,4% Table 6 - Legislative Affairs and Communications Program Costs Personnel Professional Support TOTAL Finance • Continue appropriate uses of commercial paper to advance 2009 Measure A projects of the Commission, Coachella Valley Association of Governments ;(CVAG), and .local jurisdictions. ; • Apply the sales' tax revenue forecast update to the 10-year delivery plan,: the analysis related to a recommended increase in the $500 million: 2009 Measure A bonding cap, and planning considerations for a Tong -term debt issue in 2009. • Initiate an internal audit risk assessment program. • Implement: Governmental Accounting Standards Board_ (GASB) Statement No..45 on the accounting and financial reporting for postretirement health benefit Costs, including the funding for actuarially determined liabilities. Continue: to keep abreast of GASB technical activities affecting the. Commission's accounting and ,financial reporting activities.. FY 04/05 Actual $ 191,900 139,700 111.500 .$ 443,1 00 transportation. FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 Dollar .Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected ` Budget `Change _ Change $ 250,000 $ 357,500 $ . 327,200 $, . 372,800 $ 15,300 206,200 435,000 265,700. 396,000 (39,000) 166.900 153.100 136.900 .1.60.000 ' 6,900 $- 623.10Q $ 945-6-0Q $ __928:$00 21 • • Table 7- Finance Program Costs Personnel Professional Support TOTAL FY 04/05 FY 05/06 Actual Actual $ 494,100 $ 600,600 428,800 777,500 21.800 39.200 $ 944,700 FY 06107 FY 06/07, FY 07/08 Dollar Percent Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change $ 713,400 $ 560,500 $ :696,200 819,900 1,088,400 1,269,000 62,600 49.400 65.900 $1.417.300 $ __ 1.595,90Q $1.698,30Q $_2,031100 $ (17,200) 449,100 3,300 $ . 436,200 -2.4% 54.8% 5.3% 27.3% Regional Issues • Focus on interregional concerns and maintain effective working relationships involving various bi-county transportation issues. • Manage goods movement issues and coordinate the grade separation strategy. • Continue to work closely with member agencies . on the development of a new transportation managementcenter (TMC). ; • Continue ::to address airport issues with emphasis on the .March Air Reserve Base (March ARB) plans to develop air freight services. . • Support transit oriented development initiatives. Table 8- Regional issues Program Costs Personnel , Professional Support Projects and operations TOTAL FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 06107 FY 07/08 Dollar Percent Actual Actual. Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change $ 41,500 $ 77,100 $ 226,400, $ 167,400 $,407,700 $ 181,300 80.1% 25,500 28,800 288,500 183,400 330,000 41,500 14.4% 900 1,000 14,600 6,700. 11,400 (3,200) -21.9% 10,000 10,000 (10,000) 100.0%0 $ . 67,90Q $106.900 $ _ 539,500, $ 367.50Q $ 749.1QQ $ 209.600 38n Planning and Programming • Monitor increased funding authority and responsibility related to the State Transportation Improvement ;Program (STIP) and impacts on the STIP caused by the state budget issues. • Ensure STIP and Proposition 1 B funded projects , are administered and implemented consistent with California Transportation. Commission (CTC) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) policies. • Continue to strategically program projects and obligate funds: in an expeditious manner for the maximum use of all available funding. • Monitor and track the TUMF regional arterial projects. • Identify and evaluate innovative financing strategies through strategic partnership efforts. • Prepare comments on the draft 2008 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) to ensure Commission policy and goals are reflected. • Work cooperatively with member agencies tocontinue the work efforts on the new CETAP corridors. • Continue the Congestion Management Program (CMP) update and traffic monitoring along urban and rural highway systems. • Administer the. SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Program. • Continue the development of a web -based project management database for the monitoring of project schedules and funding as well as access by local agencies: 22 Table 9- Planning and Programming Program FY 04/05. FY ,05/06 Costs Actual Actual Personnel Professional Support Projects and Operations Transfers Out TOTAL Rail • Continue capital improvements at the commuter rail stations, including parking facilities, in Riverside County. • Complete preliminary engineering of the Federal. Transit Administration (FTA) 'Small Starts Perris Valley Line and final ;design of phase 1 of the Perris multimodal facility: Work with the Orange :County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to advance additional 1E0C and 91 Line train service by 2010. • Oversee commuter rail station operation and maintenance. FY 06/07 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 Dollar Percent Revised Budget Projected Budget . Change Change. $ 388,400 $ 536,900 $ 712,900 $ 652,100 $ 800,300 $ 87,400 .12.3% ` 140,800 680,900 2,943,000 783,800 . 1,936,500 (1,006,500) 34.2% 8,600 25,600 57,000 31,200 43,700 (13,300) . -23.3% ` 1,793,200 1,866,700 3,116,500 992,800 5,543,000 2,426,500 77.9% 2,653100 (2,653,100)- 1000% =122% $ 2.331.000 $ 3.11 Q.100 $ _ 9.402.50Q $ 2.4 $ 8.323.500 ' $.(.1.159 0001 Table 10 - Rail Program Costs Personnel Professional Support Rail Station Operations Special Studies Transfers Out TOTAL, FY 04/05 Actual FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 06107 FY 07/08 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change $ 281,000 $ 269,000 220,200 450,600 100,300 144,000 4,642,400 6,581,900 86,500 341,100 400 $ 329,700 $ 313,800 $ 334,500 260,500 151,200 295,500 213,400 213,200: 151,900 7,334,400 6,990,100 8,222,200' 100,000 18,800 30,000 30,80Q $ 7.786.60Q $ a.238.000 $ 7.68Lioo L9.03.4.100 Right of Way Management • Develop a right of way acquisition program in support of capital projects. • Develop a commuter' rail ;station rehabilitation and: strategic,. plan: fon,. the long-term maintenance of the Metrolink stations. •.. Maintain the order, safety; :and ;security of Commission -owned properties. • Continue developmentofthe property inventory database in order to maintain accurate :records of all .Commission -owned properties, . properties in acquisition process, and income generating properties. $ 4,800 '1.5%. 35000 13.4% (61,500) -28.8% 887,800 12.1 % (70,000) -70.0% 0.0% 9.7% Table.11- Right of Way Management: Program Costs Personnel Professional Support` Projects and Operations TOTAL FY 04/05' , FY 05/0S . FY 06/07 FY' 06107 Actual Actual Revised Budget Projected $ 73,000 $ 135,800 $ 317,800 $ " 263,700. 413,700 406,900 481,500 '80,300 41,000 2,500 10,700 2,400 52,500 77 300 315,600' 20000 $' 580.209 $ 622.500 $ 1.125 600 $ ' 366:400 23 FY 07/08'' Dollar Percent, Budget Change Change, $ `.:1`38,000; '$ (179,800) . -56.6% ;720,000 238,500 49.5% 9,300 - (1,400) `' -13.1% 295,200 '(20,400) $1162.500; $ 36.900 • Specialized Transit - • Support innovative programs which provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or .for riders having very special transit needs and monitor funding of these programs. • Provide availability for local matching funds to Western County applicants seeking FTA Section 5310 federal capital grants. Table 12- Specialized Transit Program FY 04/05 . FY 05/06 Costs Actual Actual FY 06/07 FY 06107 FY 07/08 Dollar Percent Revised Budget Projected Budget Change.. Change Personnel $ 21,800 "$ 40,700 $ 71,800 $ 42,200 $ 97,300 $ 25,500 35.5% Professional 3,300 40,700 62,500 6,500 55,000 (7,500) -12.0% Support 4,100 .3,500 14,100 6,200 8,700 (5,400) -38.3% Projects and Operations 4,846,100 4,919,000 7,666,700 6,407,600 6,162,500 (1,504,200) 19.6% Transfers Out - 2,500 - 0.0% TOTAL $ 4.875.30Q "' $ 5.003.90Q $ • 7.815.100 Transit 6.465.000 $ 6.323.500 $11491.6001 :12,j21 • Continue implementing the recommendations resulting from the FY 2000/.01 through FY 2002/03 triennial performance audit and review transit operator performance and -annual progress reports through TransTrack and the SRTPs, respectively. • implement recommendations from the triennial performance audits for FY 2003/04 through FY 2005/06, which are scheduled to be completed by June 2007. • Continue to discuss, develop, and submit policy directions relating to transit matters through the Transit Policy Committee (TPC). • Complete the development of conceptual programs for the 2009 "Measure A transit and commuter rail funds by December 2007.- Table 13- Transit - Program Costs . Personnel Professional Support Projects and Operations TOTAL FY 04/05. - FY 05/06 Actual Actual $ 138,100 $ 158,800 76,300 15,200 4,200 10,000 54,449,700' 6t660,000 $ 54.6Q8.300 $ 61.844.0QQ FY 06107 FY 06/07 Revised Budget Projected FY 07/08 Budget $ 199,800 $ 223,700 $ 208,600 232,900 158,900 162,000 20,600 8,000 10,400 6,718,700 69.325,900 92,452,800 $ 7.172.000 ;$ 69.716.500 $ 92.83 QQ 24. Dollar Percent Change Change $ 8,800 4.4% (70,900) -30.4% (10,200) -49.5% 85.734,100 1276.1 % $ 85.661.800 1194.4% Commuter Assistance Continue rideshare incentives and support services in partnership with commuters, employers, and other governments. Continue toutilize the Program Tracking and Performance Measurement Tool (Program Measurement Tool) to more efficiently implement the Commuter Assistance program Continue efforts for cross marketing of transit and rail services with the development of a new 140-space park and ride facility located in the city of Perris at the future Perris Valley Line Metrolink station. : Maintain and operate.: a five -county ridematching database system with partner. agencies. -Continue to provide a Guaranteed Ride Home :(GRH) Program :to serve Inland Empire employers. Continue leadership role in regional discussions relating to the implementation of 511 and the dissemination of traffic and traveler information services Table 14- Commuter Assistance Program Costs Personnel Professional Support Projects and Operations Capital Outlay TOTAL. FY 04/05 FY 05/06 Actual Actual $ 289,600 $ 230,900 351,600 435,800 316,000 496,200 1,626,500 1,720,500 60.000 236.500 $2.64320 $ 3.119.90Q Motorist Assistance • Continue implementation of the recommendations includedin the 5-Year Strategic. and Financial Plan (5 Year Plan) for the call box 'program, including the rnodifcation of approximately 670 call box sites. Keep abreast of and evaluate all technology to improve call box service to hearing and speech impaired motorists. Revised Budget $ 200,300 895,000 628,700 4,454,100 95.000 $ 6.273.100 FY 06/07 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 ' Dollar Percent Projected Budget Change Change $ 195,100 $ 185900 $ (14,400); -7.2% 500,500 546,100 (348,900) 39.0% 536,200 . 645,400 16,700 , ; 2.7% 1,962,000 4,952900 498,800 11.2% , 120.000 25.000 26.3% $ 3.193.800 $ 6A50:300 $ 177.200 Table 15- Motorist Assistance Program Costs Personnel . Professional Support Projects and operations Transfers Out TOTAL FY 04/05 Actual FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 Dollar • Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change $ 101,800 $ 90,300 $ 125,100 $ 89,200 $ 187,200 $ 62,100. 49.6% 61,700 129,000 54,300 41,700 39,400 - (14,900) 27.4% 18,100 26,500 24,600 23,400 31 200 ' 6,600 26.8% . 2,009,400 2,034,600 3,508,900 2,311,900 4,710,200 1,201,,300, 34.2% 254.100 262,800 375,700 388.200 481`.200 105,500 28.1% $ 2.445.1 Q1) $ 2.541200 $ 4.088.600 $ _ _ 2A54 40Q $ '5.449.2QQ' $ 1.360.600 33.3o/n Capital Project Development and Delivery Commence . preliminary engineering and right of way activities related to projects included in the 10-Year Delivery Plan. Complete final design and begin construction' of the Perris multimodal facility and the North Main Corona commuter rail station. Complete environmental clearance and initiate preliminary engineering and right of way acquisition for the _FTA:Small Starts Perris Valley Line. • Continue environmental and preliminary design for the Bi-County 1-215 project.' 25 • • Continue the environmental and preliminary engineering services for . the . SR-79 realignment project as well as acquire right of way. • Continue development of a _ project report and environmental document for the Mid County Parkway project as well as acquire right of way. • Acquire land as mitigationfor the cumulative and direct impacts associated with construction of future highway and regional arterial projects. • Provide Measure A funding and support to Western County localjurisdictions for -15 Cajalco Road interchange preliminary engineering activities and SR-91 interchange improvements at La Sierra and Green River. • Provide Measure A funding and, support to Coachella Valley local jurisdictions for construction of operational improvements along SR-86 and SR-111 • Provide TUMF funding for regional arterial project engineering, construction, and right of way acquisition. • Provide advance funding of 2009 Measure A projectsregionalarterialprojects in the Coachella Valley and local streets and roads projects- in Blythe. Table 16-'Capital 'Project Development and Delivery Program. Costs Personnel. Professional Support Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Debt Service -Commercial Paper Transfers Out TOTAL FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FY 06107 FY 06/07 Actual Actual . Revised Budget Projected $ 378,000 $ 559,300 $ 949,700 $ 707,900 1,271,600 1,133,600 1,768,300 976,200 83,800 76,400 31,800 22,200 120,965,600 121,491,600 326,949,100 - 207,484,500 - - 236,000 44,100 - - 4,076,900 .1,500,000 36.795.600 34248.200 80.024.300 87.176.800. $ 159.494.600 S 157 509.100 $ 414.036.100 .,$ 297 911.700 FY 07108 Dollar Percent Budget Change Change $ 2,442,500 $ 1,492,800 ` 157.2% 2,443,600 675,300 38.2% 116,500 84,700 266.4% 350,063,800 23,114,700 7.1.% 500,000 264,000 111.9% 6,752,600 2,675,700 65.6% 73206.800 (6.817,500) -8.5% 436_55 800 $ 21.489.700 26 Table 17— Projected Fund Balances: by Program and Geographic. Area at June 30, 2008 Measure A Western County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Other Total . Reserved: CETAP $ - $ - $ $ 15,182,000 $ 15,182000 Commuter Assistance 10,706,200 - 10,706200 Debt Service - - 31,716,100 31,716,100 Highway 101,029,200 7,375,600 116,300 108,521,100 _ _ . Loans Receivable 563,300 -. 1,197,900 1,761,200 Local Streets and Roads 182,300 58,400 61,300 . - 302,000 Planning and Programming - 1,598;2Q,Q 1;598,200 Rail 69,256,400 - 2,444,500 71,700,900 Regional Arterials - Coachella Valley 71,800 71,800 Regional Arterials - Western County 1,373,900 1,373,900 Right of Way Management - - - 1,891,200 1,891',200 Specialized Transit 10,427,000 296,600 10,723,600 Transit' 109,121,100 109,121,100 Unreserved, designated: Motorist Assistance Unreserved, undesignated TOTAL Fund Balance 3,944,100 3,944,100 - 3.093.400 1093,400 192164A0Q $ 7.802.400 171 76 $.74Q $ 371.706.800 Chart 4-- Projected fund Balances by Governmental Fund Type and Program at June'30, 2008 " Management Services $3,093,400 Planning and Programming $1,598,200' ■. Rail $2,444,500 Right of Way Management $1,891,200 Western County$208,720,300 Commuter Assistance $10,706,200 Highway $101,029,200 Loans Receivable $563,300 Local Streets and Roads $182,300 •....TUMF $16,555,900 Specialized Transit $10,427,000 ��Rail $69,256,400 Coachella Valley $7,802,400 Highway $7,375,600 Local Streets and Roads $58,400 Regional Arterials $71,800 �•■•••Sgecialized Transit $296,600 Palo Verde Valley Local Streets and Roads $61,300 Motorist Assistance $3,944,100 State Transit Assistance $29,286,100 Local Transportation Fund $79,835,000 27 Debt. Service $31.716,100 Junior Bonds Loans Receivable $1,197,900 0 TABLE 18 - BUDGET COMPARATIVE BY SUMMARIZED LINE ITEM FY 2005 - 2008 • • FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 06/07 FY 07/W Dollar Percent Actual Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget • Change Change REVENUES Measure A Sales Tax $ 138,921,300 $ 157,236,300 $ 159,150,000 $ 159,150,000 $165,600,000 $ 6,450,000 4.1% LTF Sales Tax 74,469,800 85,134,900 11,344,200 85,268,100 78,024,400 66,680,200 587.8% STA Transit Allocation 3,348,700 5,792,400 18,672,700 18,672,800 23,263,000 4,590,300 24.6% Vehicle Registration Fees . 1,541,200 1,629,100 1,425,000 1,425,000 1,460,000 35,000 2.5% Reimbursement 25,241,100 4,365,200 '22,589,100 2,537,000 31,667,200 9,078,100 402% Other Revenue 3,118,000 13,503,900 1,932,500 6,144,300 2,947,900 1,015,400 52.5% TUMF Revenue 46,325,300 85.228,4W 42,000,000 30,100,000 27,250,000 (14,750,000) -35.1% Investment Income 5,146,300 11.639,700 12.509.000 8,017,100 16.678,500 4.169,500' 33.3% TOTAL Revenues 298,111,700 364,529,90D 269,622,500 311,314,300 346,891,000 77,268,500 28.7% EXPENDITURES Personnel Salary and Benefits 2,965,900 3,674,600 4,964,300 4.196,000 6,589,400 1,625,100 32,7% Professional and Support General Legal Services 1,313,500 1,568,500 1,477,900 1,234,100 1,577,900 100,000 6.8% Financial Advisory 52,300 ' 71,700 Z765,000 759,900 1,650,000 (1,115,000) -40.3% Audit Services 358.500 324,600 520,000 395,3W 503,000 (17,000) -3.3% Professional Services Other• " 1,608.700 2.532.900 3.619,000 1,964,200 4.639.400 1.020,400 28.2% TOTAL Professional Costs 3,333,000 4,497,700 8,381.900 4,353,500 8,370,300 (11,600) -0.1% Support Costs 1,696,400 1.995,700 2,493.400 2.547,300 2.662,200 168.800 6.8% TOTAL Professional and Support Costs • 5,029,400 6,493,400 10,875,300 6,900,800 11,032,500 157,200 . 1.4% Projects and Operations: Projects -General 2,010,400 2,249.300 3,730,900 909,800 4,810,100 1,079,200 28 9% Rail 1,427,800 1,500,300 1,782,600 1,480,600 1,,717,600 (65,000) -3.6% SAFE 447,200 482,600 1,699,300 722,900 2,281,700 582,400 34.3% Towing 1.439,000 1.438,900 1,604,200 1,422,000 2,278,400 674,200 42.0% Commuter Assistance 1,58.8,500 . 1,679,500 2,079,100 1,892,000 .2,562,900 483,800 23.3% Engineering 10.382,400 , 17,231,600 50;172,500 15,541,400 59,270.100 9,097,600 18:1% Construction 28,913,400 16,754,900 56,409,100 13,403,000 64,870,000 8,460,900 15.0% Right of Way and Land 15.235,400 13,916,200 143,937,100 106,577,900' 144,763,100 826,000 0.6% SCRRA Contribution 3,214,600 5,505.400 6,768,400 5,524,600 7,957,300 1,189,200 17.6% Special Studies 2,426,800 1,525.600 2,776,400 465,600 4,665,400 1,889,000 68.0% Special Transportation/Transit 4,846,100 4,919,000 ' 7,616,700 6,397,600 6,122.500 (1.494,200) -19.6% Local Streets and Roads 53,330,700 60,386,800 59,493,300 59,493,300 61,959,500 2,466,200 4.1% Regional Arterials - Coachella Valley " 10,053,700 10,350,500 14,021,400 11,374,200 15,553,600 1,532,200 .10.9% LTF Disbursements 53,105,700 58,364,800 1,364,600 66,667,200 78,183,800 76,8.19,200 5629.4% STA Disbursements 2,050.200 4,387,300 6,718,700 3.651.500 15.436.600 8,717.900 129.8%. TOTAL Project and Operating Costs 190.471,900 200,692,700 360,174,000 295,523,600 472,432,600 112,258,600 31.2% Debt Service Principal Payments 27,228,200 28,669,400 30.364,400 30,364,400 32,012,100 1,647.700, 5.4% Interest Payments 8,400,400 7,679,000 9,063,600 6,536,700 9,933,800 870,200 9.6% Arbitrage Rebate Tax 2,141,600 236,100 - - 0.0% Cost of Issuance 438.600 • 150,000 100,000 280 000 130,000 86.7% TOTAL Debt Service 38,208,800 36,584,500 39,578,000 37,001,100 42,225,900 2,647,900: 6.7% Capital Outlay 179.800 290.500 • 431.000 84.100 942.000 511,000. 118.6%. TOTAL Expenditures • 236.855,800 247,735,700 416,022.600 341705.600 533,222.400 117 199,800 28.2% Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 61,255,900 . 116,794,200 (146.400.100) (32,391,300) 086,331,400) (39,931,300) 27.3% Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In-37,050,200 34,517,000 83,053,100 87,567,500 74,688,000 (8,365,100) -10.1% Transfers Out (37,050,200) (34,517,000) (83,053,100) (87,567.500) (74,688,000) 8,365,100 10.1% Debt Proceeds 30.005.000 80.000,000 • 50.000,000" 87.000.000 7.000,000 -8.7%, Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) • Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 91,260,900 116,794,200 (66.400,100) 17,608.700 (99,331.400) (32,931,300) -49.6% Beginning Fund Balance 245,374,400 336,635,300 453,429,500 453,429,500 471,038,200 17,608,700 3:9% Change in accounting principles - _ N/A ENDING FUND BALANCE. $ 336.635.300 $ 453.429.500 $ 387.029.400 $ 471.038.200 $ 371.706.800 $ (15,322.6001 Alla 28 Table 19 —Operating and Capital Budget FY 2007/08 FY2007/08 FY 2007/08 FY 07/08 Operating Budget Capital Budget Total Budget REVENUES Measure A Sales Tax 3 13,768,000 $ 151,832,000 $ 165,600,000 LTF Sales Tax 77,799,600 224,800 78,024,400 STA Transit Allocation 23,263,000 23,263,000 Vehicle Registration Fees - 1,460,000 1,460.000 Reimbursement 9,013,700 22,653,500 31,667,200 Other Revenue 467,800 2,480,100 2,947,900 _ . TUMF Revenue - 27,250,000 27,250,000 Investment Income 5,670,000 11,008,500 16,678,500 TOTAL Revenues 131,442,100 215.448,900 - 346,891,000 EXPENDITURES Personnel Salary and Benefits 4,146,900 2,442,500 6,589•400 Professional and Support • General Legal Services 463,000 1,114,900 1,577,90,0 Financial Advisory 75,000 1,575,000 1,650,000 Audit Services 500,000 3,000 503,000 Professional Services.:- Other 2,758,700 1,880,700 4,639,400 TOTAL Professional Costs 3,796,700 4,573,600 8,370,300: Support Costs 2,545,700 116,500 2,662,200 TOTAL Professional and Support Costs 6,342,400 Projects and Operations: Projects -General 530,300 4,279,800 4,810.100 Rail 1,717,600 1,717,600 _, SAFE 2,281,700 2,281,700 Towing 2,278,400 2,278,400 Commuter Assistance 2,562,900 2,562,900 Engineering 59,270,100 59,270,100 ' Construction 64,870,000 64,870,000 Right of Way and Land 144,763,100 144,763,100 SCRRA Contribution 6,504,600 1,452,700 7,957,300 . Special Studies 4,450,400 215,000 4,665,400 * Special; Transportation/Transit 6,122,500 6,122,500 Local Streets and Roads - 61,959,500 61,959,500- Regional.Arterials - Coachella Valley - 15,553,600 15,553,600 LTF Disbursements 78,183,800 78,183,800 STA Disbursements 15,436,600 15,436,600 TOTAL Project and Operating Costs 120,068,800 352,363,800 - 472,432,600 Debt Service Principal Payments - Interest Payments Cost of issuance ' TOTAL Debt Service Capital Outlay TOTAL. Expenditures' Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Debt Proceeds Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance. ENDING FUND BALANCE 942,000 131.500,100 4,690,100 11,032.500 32,012,100 32,012,100 9,933,800 9,933,800 280,000 280,000 42,225,900 42,225.900 . 942,000 401.722.300 533,222,400 (58,000) (186,273,400) 731,200 (1,481,200) 73,956,800 (73,206,800) 87.000.000 (186,331,400) 74,688,000 (74,688,000 87,000,000 (808,000) (98,523,400) (99,331,400) 144,330,300 326,707,900 _ _ 471,038,200 143.522.300 $ 228.184.500 .3 371.706.800 29 • • Table 20- Budget Expenditures and Other Uses Summarized by Governmental Fund Type FY 2007108 General Fund . Special Revenue Capital Projects Debt Service Total Personnel Salary and Benefits $ 3,590,200 $ 2,999,200 $ $ - $ 6,589,400 Professional and Support Expenditures' General Legal Services 419,300 1,099,600 59,000 1,577,900 Financial Advisory 71,400 3,600 1,575,000 1,650,000 Audit Services 475,800 27,200 - - 503,000 Professional Services -Other 2.128.700 2,010,700 - 500.000 - 4.639,400. TOTAL Professional Services 3,095,200 3,141,100 2,134,000 - 8,370,300 Support Costs 1.781.500 880.700 - 2,662,200 TOTAL Professional and Support Services 4,876,700 4,021,800 2,134,000 11,032,500 Project and Operations Expenditures Program Management - 4,234,800 4,234,800 Projects - General 295,200 280,100 575,300 Rail 1,717,600 1,717,600 SAFE - 2,281,700 2,281,700 Towing ` 2,278,400 - 2,278,400 Commuter Assistance • 2,562,900 2,562,900 Engineering - 56,669,100 2,601,000 59,270,100 Construction 63,970,000 900,000 64,870,000 Right of Way and Land - 79,738,100 65,025,000 144,763,100 SCRRA Contribution 6,504,600 1,452,700 7,957,300 Special Studies 4,405,400 260,000 4,665,400 Special Transportation/Transit - 6,122,500 - - 6122,500 Local Streets and Roads - 61,959,500 61,959,500 Regional Arterials - Coachella Valley - 15,553,600 15,553,600 LTF Disbursements . 1,167,600 77,016,200 78,183,800 STA Disbursements - 15,436,600 --15,436,600 TOTAL Project and Operations Expenditures 14,090,400 389,816,200 68,526,000 - 472,432,600 Capital Outlay 306,400 635,600 942,000 Debt Service Principal and Interest 6,472,60035,473,300 41,945,900 Cost of Issuance 280.000 280.000 TOTAL Debt Service 6,752,600 35,473,300 42,225,900 Other Financing Uses: Transfers Out _ 52,204,500 22,483.500 74,688,000 TOTAL Expenditures and Other Financing Uses $ 22.863.700 $ 449 677.300 $ 99.896.100 $ 35.473.300 $ 607.910.400 30 Table 21 • Highway, Regional Arterial, and Rail Programs FY 2007/08 QescriAtion Projects General Program Management and Contract Administration (Bechtel Corp.) TOTAL PROJECTS GENERAL Highway Engineering • SR-60 East Junction to 1-215 HOV SR-71/SR-91 Connectors SR-74/G Street to k215 SR-74/I-15 to 7th Street SR-74 Curve Realignment SR-79 Realignment SR-91 NOT Lanes SR-91 HOV Lanes/Mary Street to 7th Street SR-111 City Projects (La Ouinta, Indio, and Cathedral City) 1-10 Truck Climbing Lane 1-15 HOT Lanes/SR-91 to SR-74 1-15/Cajalco Interchange 1-215/1-15 to Scott Road -215/Scott Road to Nuevo Road '-• 1-215(Nuevo Road to Box Springs I-215 Bi-County Project • Mid County Parkway SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY AND REGIONAL ARTERIAL ENGINEERING Regional Arterial Engineering Various Westem County Regional Arterial Projects Various Coachella Valley Regional Arterial Projects SUBTOTAL REGIONAL ARTERIAL ENGINEERING Rail Engineering Perris Valley Line PerrisMuitimodal Facility North Main Corona Station Parking Structure General SUBTOTAL RAIL ENGINEERING TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL ENGINEERING Highway Construction SR-60 HOV LanesNalley Wayto 1=15 . SR-60 HOV LaneslA-215 to Redlands Boulevard SR-74A-15 to 7th Street SR-74/G Street to 1-215 SR-86 County of Riverside Project " SR-91 Green River Interchange Bridge SR-91 La Sierra Interchange SR-111 Magnesia Falls to Fairway , ,SR-111 City Projects (La Ouinta,Indio, and CathedralCity) SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION . Regional Arterial Construction • Blythe/Lovekin Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation and Chanslorway Pavement Overlay Various Westem County Regional Arterial Projects SUBTOTAL REGIONAL ARTERIAL CONSTRUCTION Rail Construction Perris Muttimodal Facility 5,000,000 , North Main Corona Station Parking Structure 11,005,600 'Riverside Downtown Station Parking Lot Expansion-Eastside 15,000 SUBTOTAL RAIL CONSTRUCTION. • 16,020,000, TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL CONSTRUCTION $. 84,870,000'' $. 4,234,800 $ 4,234,800 $ 1,500,000 1,000,000 1,600,000 25,000 800,000 5,000,000' 9,800,000 200,000 950,000 300,000 1,750,000 600,000 1,500,000 1,1300,000 2,000,000 500,000 8,000,000 37,325,000 13,484,1300 2,601,000 16,085,800 5,000,000 315,000 500,000 44,300 5,850,300 $$ 59,270,100 $ 4,800,000 10,000 . 175,000 2,300,000 271,000 . 6,239,000 15,000,000 1,000-000 3,634;000, 33,429,000 900,000 14,521,000 15,421,000 Highway Right of Way and Land SR-60 East Junction to 1-215 HOV SR-74/1-15 to 7th Street SR-74/G Street to I-216 SR-71/SR-91 Connectors SR=79 Reatignment SR-81 HOT Lanes SR-911-10V Lanes/Mary Street to 7th Street 1-15HOT Lanes/SR-91 to SR-74 1.215/1-15 to Scott Road - Mid County Parkway' MSHCP Land Acquisition = Western County MSHCP;Land Acquisition - Coachella Valley SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND ; - Regional Arterial Right of Way and Land Various Westem County Regional Arterial Projects SUBTOTAL REGIONAL" ARTERIAL' RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND, ' Rail Right of Way and Land Penis Valley Line SUBTOTAL RAIL RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND . TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND GRAND TOTAL HIGHWAY, REGIONAL ARTERIAL, AND RAIL PROGRAMS 31 130,000 770,000 50,000 10,000; . - 25;060,000. 30,000 5,750,000 8,000 10,000 30,160,000 50,000,000 15,025,000 127,003,000 7.640,100 7,640,100 10,120,000 10,120,000 $ 144,783,100 $ 273,1313,080 002'9091LE S 009900'121 S 00S'6ZYCep S 009,16ZL S 0099291C $ 009'6590E S 002 si $ 009'662 Lt $ 006S91Z1 $ 00Z�et9'6LC $ 00G'99r 911, S OOL'CLG'IOr S 00C L296 $ 009,1901 $ 0090et6 S 00Z'9E0'lLt 0098Z9CS1 000'SC9'9EC 001'2,9'le 002'65102 00915266Z 009109U 006'S9111 0091,99SZ 00591191r OOL CLYIOr 00Z'695'LLZ COO Irt'01 001'Ott6 00S029'9 (0014E9118) 00L'90921 00916L'911 009Sst1 0099911 00991t 900919LO 00L'Ce/ 1009969e11 (009/.6L99) 0091/9/1 000'2006Zl (DOL'9191) 000E11'4 00960L 001'016'L09 $ 004'ELZ'522 $ OOL'ZGtZeZ f DOC•EL✓SC $ 001'9C29E S 009529Se S 001/2968 $ 0090LSBr $ 00C'Du's' S OOE'LL9'611 S 00959S'let S OOL'On LIZ S OOL C99'Z2 S 004'009f1 S 009990'Sl $ 000990'1.L 009L99L9 000'LIS'IC 00919 009C91'ZZ DOS r02'29 000909[9 00605S're 001'9 000'092 000'001. - 000'092 00(001 - • 001.9t$ - 001'9CL 00901.6'4r GOV 106'9C 0099rE'9C 009CL9SE 000L9SC 009L991C 0092L99 0090091 009'509 0091 0091 00012 00962 000'00 00/'19 011906L 009St9 00991. 005.65Z 001.90E 001.9E 00919 009E91'9L 00ZL99e9 009•096.99 011t910'LL 0091,L9.99 00L2L9L9 009t911 0091.16 0017.801 009'CS2'SL 009,22'41 00909901 009CS991 0021,L6'l1 00S9SC'Ol - - ODY05619 009C823S 009'92909 00965919 00950965 009.99909 • 000'9E9S1 009199e 009Lftr - - 0099CYS1 009159$ 009L991 - 0097299 009[699 000'6/91, 009ZZ99 009L699 0001610.1 • - D096999 009991. 0095191 009.9.2 000'06Z 009'9E1 0Or'696 009509r 00992 0092191 009LS9L 009YZ9S 009S055 - OOL•ZS1,1 001'01 01:290Zr 009Y099 0096095 0091995 00909L'/11 009LL9901 0099119El 000'9E019 000'000'0f OOL'CZ✓Zl 001.9CL'BL 009LLY99 005'L623 - 0090L929 000'COY6L 006'lleel 000'006 0090091 000'0L9L9 009E09'2 0091r9L'9t 0090L925 009119S1 009'1E9[1 0091092 000.12ZZ 009990'9S 009411'0 009I ELL1 009Z99Z 009269I. 0096/91 - - 009Z99$ 0001891 0096L91. 001.9L22 0001E1,2 0061C91 009929Z 0001Z91 006.0E91 • we sets 009224 000'291 OOL'l9rt 006121 OWLS/ • 009LL91. 009.0991 035'000'1 DO9'LILl 00909Y1 009009.1 009012'r 009609 0096,Z'Z 0090191, 002'629 009SL 9Z 00=62 0090L 00S'OL 009299Z 009119Z 00L'S66'1 - 00L'009 000'0L9 001'119 ON' len C2X'LL9l 0001291 0090L99 OOS'£SC•r 00L'L99r 000'Kl'Z DOS•9/tl 00Le16 00l'tll'E 009595'1 00(929'1 009960't 002'1,91 0092991 0096999 f 00990 Vr S 000'1191 $ S - $ • $ S $ • S 0096661 S 009901'1 S 009965 S 009069C S DOLLe9C S 009212'L S 000'BLS 'BOS 000'9991g 009'LOS'Le 000'119'PC ODE'ELYSE 002I,L1'St 000'L 10'Pt 001..96.9E OOL'r90'29 009'ZDL 000'OSZ 000'2 DOLZIL 009909L9 000'000'00 - 009000'L2 009000.06 000.009LZ 000'00905 (*Yawn D00099L2 000'001'05 001.9Zte9 00911L991 009[101 00[1E911 0092991 009.0191 009628.1 009Z11, 00tr 001'269 D00'9t911 0090999 0091C99 002.29E 009061 002'920 000'092l 0090L94 0099E91. - 0090991 0096if l 0096L91 - 006'LI61 009114'9 006•E0961 - DOt06t'Z 001's£9'9 009'LLB•LI 00LLSI 009600 C(1916S 000t9VSZ 009E1991 009Z6L'S 000't9ZCZ welts's'. 00t'Led'S ' 009140'L 00909 001'1E01. OOZES 0092C 001'1IL OOYLOS 009L1 00991e 009'9LS'OL 0019EOE 009'921. 00.9909L1 00610E (009006) 000'OLLC • 0092119L 009E1)901 009299Z 009L1192 009'1796 °OL OI'L OOS IL9'L 0099101 00l'C1 0099L1 0091.2.0'9L 001'29929 0061.C959 00t60929 00962.9CL 0019692L 00Z5CO21 000'60911 009'9621 000009'591 S 000051.091 S DOCULLSL f 1• S• S S• $• S toot 6191 S Downs's% S 00C'9t1'f2s S 00900L'E S 000'OOYt S 000.069E S 002 lee'91t S 006.810.60E f OOL OEL'0C $ 009,UOt f 00S'196'SC f 002'ZWLe S 00Z100'0S $ 0011E9 $ 000'02929E S 0099Cf'9re $ 00e$L991£ S 000'LtYIZ S 00911.1 f 001'CLLSL f PEWS PuPPPel I9a0Y WPM PepOReLl IenpY 126000 50109201d 160192 100909 50109506 Pnpy P6p9 POPad I BOOLO Ai 20I90 Ai 901i0 Ai SOILO Ai 40190 Ad 9090A2 9040 Ai L0190 Ai 90,5D Ai 90/L0 AA LONG Ai 90'20.1i NILO Ai L0/00 Ai 90N0 Ai POP/ Puna 901V9S p90 Wna 15.0910+51161090 sPeni anuu9y wads pond pau90 • • 30101Y9 ONna ONION3 men Pena eyuy6ae sumpundr3(ppm) PPP nunUPPll p POPPOtL9p)PPP) seen PIPP11a Pnleu5S31Y101 Inn eN/tuU1 909mmq )0 MO I9l OROatl 906212IY a0N2$pa0 22200 109080 91+3ua1m9lg0 ALj PPP e1PW9o0- maw Imo) ep90y Sue IMPS nsUP1 9nunluP OPP119PS PP,IPPPI dauul mods PPM re129u5 uYln84e00 Vtltl09 Peel pug NM 1.319% e010110000 M9894923 ODOC192LYI9NUwL0 2100221. 2229 1921 0212920-242622 i 11f0090ddn$ 999NaB 1022199910Id r1W99 2092i Ws Lia919 9.u909ad S3SL1 TIONYNli 2031n0$ Pp4944 Paleu41131Y101 y 6a PWJ1 99e90ad LWO *maned mu smog Pe WP9ny 1914 1.40.995214 91.4119A 9neYay Me0 u:9001 llpuell viS awwaun4upti Alpo 219e1.2206202e}L 2/2222i nuew99m LOOLI Net$ nl SOPS ill 22129129 Y°Anon S33N005 900NYN1i sesn pue 960Ln0S 1e!DOeuld palew119'3 i0 00Z • 900Z Ai ZZ Mel Ji AGENDA ITEM 1 1 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: April 23., 2007 TO: Budget. and Implementation Committee FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: _ Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: -. Recurring Contracts for Fiscal Year 2007/08 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the Recurring Contracts for Fiscal Year 2007/08; and 2) Forward_ to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Ten years ago, the Commission evaluated all recurring contracts to determine when and if to hold a .competitive process. As a result of that review, most contracts were rebid. In addition, the Commission required that recurring contracts be approved at the beginning of each year. All other contracts are bid on a periodic basis ranging from three to' five years. The following is a listing of recurring contracts proposed for FY 20.07/08: Schedule of Recurring .Contracts Consultant Name Description of Services Budget FY 06/07 Budget FY 07/08 Dollar Change Percent Change Best Best & Krieger General Legal Services $1,377,900 $1,518,900 $141,000 10.2% Caporicci & Larson TDA/Measure A Audit Services 200,000 210,000 10,00.0 5.0% Cingular Wireless Call Box Analog Cellular Service 35,000 32,000 (3,000) (8.6%) Comarco Wireless Technologies Call Box Maintenance 244,200 253,700 9,500 3.9% Inland Transportation Services (ITS) Commuter Assistance Program Management 1,386,000 1,700,000 314,000 22.7% MHV Enterprises, Inc. Ridernaster Software 25,000 25;000 0 0.0% 33 ConsultantName' Description of Services Budget FY 06/07 Budget FY 07/08 Dollar Change Percent . -, Change Rahimian Management and Consulting, Inc. Project Management Services 200,000 200,000 0 . 0.0% Ray Gorski Air Quality Technical services 20,000 25;000 5,000 25.0% . Trapeze` Ridematching Software 370,000 407,000 37,000 10.0,% VRPA Technologies.. '' Congestion Management 50,000 60,000 10,000 20:0% The Best Best ..& Krieger contract for FY 2007/08 reflects an increase of $14.1.,000,. which is primarily attributable to general legal services for capital project delivery. and implementation activities related to Measure A highways. General legal. services f, related to management services, regional programs, and regional ; arterial and rail projects are comparable to or lower than the prior year. Caporicci & Larson has performed the Transportation .Development Act and Measure A local jurisdiction financial and compliance audits. Theseservices were competitively procured in 2003, and the term of the agreement was for originally for three years through June 30, 2006 but was extended for an additional year through the recurring contracts approval process. The Commission's financial and. compliance audit has been performed by another audit firm that was selected. during the same procurement process; however, that agreement expires June 30, 2008. It would be more :effective and efficient to have. both audit firms with thef same term through June 30, 2008, and conduct the audit .procurements in January 2008 or February 2008. The Caporicci & Larson audit fees. are similar to FY 2006/07 fees. The conversion of call boxes from analog to digital service by Cingular. Wireless was delayed untilcompletion of the call" box removal project. The digital conversion project. -should be completed. by December 2007. • Accordingly, the contrast related to analog, service should be extended through December 31, 2007. Any, expenditure incurred'for analog service will be offset by a savings in the digital service contract. The Comarco Wireless Technologies contract expires December 31,: 2007 and provides for routine corrective and preventive maintenance of call boxes, including knockdowns and vandalism. Comarco Wireless Technologies was selected -as.; a result of a competitive procurement in 2001, in which it was the only responsive bidder:, and has provided these services since the inception of the call box program. A request for proposal process is not anticipated immediately upon f contract expiration, and .Comarco has been included-: as a recurring contract for the last six. months of FY 2007/08. 34 • • • ITS has been included as a recurring contract since FY 2003/04 and is considered to be a unique solesource provider for the administration of the Commuter Assistance program. The : FY 2007/08 Commuter Assistance budget includes nine new or expanded projects which have been added to ITS's scope of work. A portion of the increase in the ITS contract is related to services .provided for the San Bernardino Associated Governments commuter assistance program, for which the Commission is 'reimbursed. MHV Enterprises, Inc. owns the copyright the Ridemaster software used in the Commuter Assistance program. It has licensed the software to three local transportation agencies, including the Commission. The software tracks client support, commuter participation, and other data as necessary to monitor program . performance and protect . against fraud. Due to the .proprietary nature of the ongoing support, maintenance, and enhancement of the software, MHV Enterprises should continue to be included as a recurring contract. Rahimian has provided .project management services related to oversight: of the geotechnical work and special permit application process on the Riverside County - Orange County (RC-0C) CETAP Corridor project, and this contract expires February 28, 2008. It is anticipated that the geotechnical work and related evaluation will be conducted in 2008 with final reports due in February 2009. Based on the level`, of work associated with this geotechnical feasibility study and Mr. Rahimian's knowledge and expertise with the RC-OC Major Investment Study, it -is recommended that this contract be extended through June 30, 2009. Ray Gorski has provided 'on -call technical services to the Commission primarily in the areas .of air quality and alternative fuels. Projects funded with CMAQ funds are required to have project level air quality analyses. His services were required this year for the North .Main Corona parking structure and the SR-60 HOV conversion project. As the Commission continues to commit CMAQ funds on projects, it is essential to have the ability to utilize Mr. Gorski's services. During FY 2007/08, an. air quality analyses will be needed for a CMAQ call for projects for Salton Sea. Air Basin apportionment funding. Proposals were solicited for a ridematching software program for the Inland Empire, and a contract was awarded to Trapeze in 2002. Subsequently -the software/license agreement was expanded to include Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura counties functionality. The software also has been customized over the past years in response to the unique regional air quality requirements. As a result of the customization and five -county regional partnership, this contract has been included in the recurring contracts since FY 2005/06. The $37,000 increase in the contract for FY 2007/08 is related to the completion of the Rideguide and transit integration project, which is funded by a grant from the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee. VRPA provides assistance with activities related to the Congestion Management Program (CMP), including traffic monitoring. During FY 2007/08, :VRPA work efforts: will include the biennial update of the CMP in addition to quarterly traffic monitoring of the CMP system. These contracts have already been included in the FY 2007/08 Proposed Budget, and, as such, no budget ;'adjustment is required. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: $4,024,600: Source of Funds: Measure. A, TDA, TUMF, FSP, SAFE fees, Interest, and Other Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: N/A Fiscal Procedures Approved: \pu,tivi: ualDate: 4/23/07. 36 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: April 23, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Extension for the City of Lake Elsinore STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Grant the city of Lake Elsinore (City) an extension to June 30, 2008 to complete the Mohr Street, Sumner Avenue and La Strada Street sidewalk improvement projects; and 2► Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In FY 2006, the Commission awarded $1,557,594 to fund twenty-seven projects as part of its SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program. The agencies have until June 30, 2007 to complete the projects. The city of Lake Elsinore was allocated $1 1,250 for construction of the Mohr Street sidewalk project, $33,900 for the construction of the Sumner Avenue sidewalk project, and $23,500 for the construction of the La Strada Street sidewalk project. All three projects are part of larger CDBG (federal) funded projects which involved more complex right of way issues. The plans, specifications and cost estimates are complete for the projects. The City was also allocated $52,750 for construction of four (4) projects in FY 2006/07 and has until June 30, 2008 to complete those projects. The City has decided to combine the projects for both fiscal years to minimize administrative costs for advertising, inspecting and constructing these projects. Therefore, the City is requesting a twelve month .extension to June 30, 2008 to complete the three projects funded in FY 2006. Attachment: Letter from City of Lake Elsinore 37 79815 •LADE LSIlYOI�E --,-'� DREAM EXTREME i`L- March 21, 2007 • Mr. Jerry Rivera Program Manager RCTC Riverside County Regional Complex 4080 Lemon Street, 3'd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208. RD s©Wniii Gi MAR 2 2 20E7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION CO??It...7iSS!1:7" Subject: Request for Time Extension for Construction of SB-821 Funded Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Dear Mr. Rivera, RCTC approved three pedestrian projects for FY 2005/06 and seven pedestrian projects for FY 2006/07. These projects were funded by SB-821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Program. In order to supplement our construction costs, the city will use the available CDBG funding to construct these projects. Most of these projects will enable students in low to moderate income level, to utilize the safety of sidewalks to safely attend elementary and middle schools. Plans, specifications and cost estimate are complete. We will advertise and award the contract in the next few months. This project is part of a federally funded CDBG project. City is combining the projects from FY 2005/06 and FY 2006/07 to minimize administration costs for advertising, inspecting and constructing these projects. We hereby request a 12 month extension of time. If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 674-3124 ext. 242. Sincerely, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE David S. Solomon Project Engineer 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET 41111.AKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 WINXI AKE-EI.SINORE OR.G [4i-[.,rrd,-J`<ieuu-3 20-0i 38 • AGENDA ITEM 13 • • 4 • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: April 23, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: John Standiford, Public Affairs Director THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the state and federal legislative status report; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: RCT-C Sponsored Legislation Update During the current session, the Riverside .County Transportation Commission is sponsoring two bills as part of ,its highway delivery plan and implementation of the Perris Valley Line project. Assembly Bill 1295 (Spitzer) would provide the Commission the legislative authorization to pursue publicly -owned toll facilities on State Route 91 (SR-91) and Interstate 15 (1-15). Assembly Bill 1240 (Benoit) would allow the Commission to use design -build contract procurement in -delivering the Perris Valley -Line project. AB 1295 was first introduced in "spot form which means that the first draft of the bill provides only scant information and detail with the intent to amend the bill at a future time. This was necessary with this bill because any attempt to pursue the development of a told facility requires cooperation and assistance from the Orange County Transportation Authority. (OCTA) due to its ownership of the. 91 Express Lanes and the existence of a franchise from the state of. California that provides the owner of the 91 Express Lanes with tolling rights all the way to 1-15. During the last few weeks, Commission staff has been working with OCTA to craft language that will be acceptable to OCTA while providing the Commission with the authorization it needs to complete its Western Riverside `County Highway Delivery Plan that was . approved in December 2006. Commissioners John Tavaglione and Jeff Miller have also been working with OCTA Board members as part of an ad hoc 39 committee appointed by the Riverside County -Orange County Toll Road Advisory Committee that was created by Assembly Bill 101' O in 2002. Key issues for ,OCTA were to protect its current franchise rights by allowing the OCTA Board to either transfer or terminate its rights in Riverside County, the need to ensure that the Commission's toll plans are similar to . O'CTA's current operations, and the elimination of a current provision in law that prevents, toll revenue from the 91 Express Lanes from being used on another toll facility. The latter point was especially important because OCTA is interested in developing' a direct connector that would ease transitions from the State Route 241 Toll Road and SR-91. Language has ' now been developed to meet both agencies needs and will be considered by the OCTA Board of Directors during its meeting on April 23, 2007. A copy of the staff report from OCTA and the bill will be: provided to the Committee but was not available at the time this staff report was drafted. The current version of AB 1295 only provides authorization for thedevelopment of a toll facility on 1-15. The next step is to amend the State Route 91 authorization language into the bill as quickly as possible. Commissioner Jeff Miller. ,and Eric. Haley will attend the OCTA Board meeting on April 23, 2007. In addition to this Comrnittee's meeting and OCTA's full ,board meeting, -April 23 also marks the date of AB 1295's first committee hearing in Sacramento. The bill will be considered by the Assembly Transportation Committee during the afternoon and Commissioner John Tavaglione will testify :on behalf of .the bill along with DeputyExecutive Director Anne Mayer. AB 1240 is scheduled to be heard by the same Assembly Transportation Committee on April 30. Unlike AB 1295 the wording of this bill has been set from the beginningwhich hasallowed a number of organizations to take formal .support positions on :the bill including the :city of Moreno Valley; ,the Riverside, Corona :a'nd':, Southwest Chambers of Commerce; Southern, California Regional: :Rail Authority (METROLINK); and the Southern California Association of Governments. Court Decision Helpful to Private Engineering Firms The California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 35, an initiative approved in 2000 that specifically allows contracting out with the . private sector for engineering and architectural .expertise on state infrastructure projects. The Court's decision was unanimous : and rejected a, suit brought by Professional Engineers in California Government'(.PECG). 40 4 • • While this case was in court, PECG sponsored AB 1337 ' by Assembly Transportation. Committee Chairman- Pedro Nava. The original version of the bill would have required . Ca!trans employees to be the sole workers on all state highway engineering and construction management. The bill has been amended to apply only to inspections. The status of the bill is now uncertain, so Commission staff will monitor the bill closely .and will return back to the Commission for a recommended position if the bill is not additionallyamended or continues to move through the process.: Container Fee Bill .Introduced Senator Alan Lowenthal of Long Beach has once again introduced legislation (SB 974) to assess a $60 fee on containers traveling through the Ports of Long Beach, Los Angeles and Oakland. The revenue from the fees would be divided in half with 50 percent being used to improve port and goods movement infrastructure and the remainder being used for projects to mitigate the impact of .goods movement. The bill specifically calls out grade separations in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties as appropriate projects for the use of the mitigation part of the program. Also, revenue collected from the Southern California ports would be; used exclusively in. Southern California and revenue collected in Oakland would be used in Northern California. The actual allocations would come under the purview of the California Transportation Commission. The bill calls for implementation in 2009 which leads credence to the idea that the final disposition of this bill might not take place until 2008. There are a number of issues that would need to be resolved before this bill could be passed or to take effect. One key question would pertain to the legality of the billand whether the state of California can impose thiskind of fee on an interstate or international enterprise. Moreover; there will -.be; questions on who would pay the fee; while -the bill directs the ports to assess the fee, is it paid by the retailers, shippers or another party? Also, would this revenue be considered for the source of private matching dollars that are required in Proposition 1 B for freight -related projects? During its next meeting the Commission's Ad. Hoc Grade Separations Committee will be considering funding issues for grade separation projects.- One item that will be on the next agenda is Commissioner Steve Adams proposal for a program of voluntary premiums on 'container cargo that would be used to pay 'for goods movement -related infrastructure. This would be administered much differently than the legally -mandated tax/fee _ program that is outlined in SB 974. Staff believes that thead hoc committee should have the opportunity to consider these approaches and will return with recomrnendations based on that input along with an update on future developments. 41 Federal Update Commission staff has been working cooperatively with two business organizations that will be ;traveling to Washington soon to meet with representatives on Riverside. County infrastructure needs. Both the Monday Morning Group and the Valley Group have invited the Commission to make presentations to their organizations on federal issues and for assistance in preparing transportation -related.' materials and issue papers. The Valley Group will be visiting Washington during the first' week of May with the Monday Morning Group traveling the following week. Attachment: Legislative Matrix 42 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - POSITIONS ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION 0 Revised: 4/23/07 � LEGISLATION AB 291 & 'Bmnoit) This bill relinquishes state control of portions' of8R_74vv�hin ' Lmho Elsinore city limits -to the City Lake Elsinore. Passed by4naen�b|y . Transportation- Committee; Referred to Appropriations Committee - ` �_.u�' `p� p' p� rt' 7 ^O /1` 1 O'` � 1240 ..Valley authorizesd County Transportation Commission CTC> to use deoig'buibcontracting in thedelivery'. of the Perris Line Kwtrp|inkExtension. mbly 'Referred TransportationCommittee; hearing set for 0/07 8upport -4 04/11/07AB � _/''' ' AJR 14 Waf hem>` ' ^ - ' to enact' federal legislation: that ensures a substantial increment of new revenues from. customs duties and -importation fmam ig dedicated to gnodsm�ovmnnentp/ in Californiaand other impacted states. - . Ref erred to Jobo,E�:onmnnim '- Developmentand �thm'�oonorny - placed on consent calendar S4pport SB 9 (Lovv�ntha|) - ' ` Thi 'biUvU| bma vehicle for mmzeb|hshin pfo 'n of transportation, projects to be fundmd. from the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TC|P} of Proposition 1 B The T�|P is o $� biUion fund � ' 'Amended and m,eferredto 8anota ' Transportation 8k Housing Committee. Set for hearing O4/1 7/O7. -Monitor01/10/07 ' ` .SB19!� ' . (Lowenthal) ` ' This bill will be m vehicle for establishing conditions and criteria for n� be f ded' underh $1 billion by r/opnmn/on / B omo/oazmo to:reducing mnnismmnw related no Qm000 ' �mnoven�ent ' Amended and � re'n�mrmxJ to ` Senate.Transportation 8, Housing - C ' for = — ----' --' �' hearing 04/17-/0' 7 Monitor ]01 /1(0/O7 ` S��5 (Pwrato> . This. U ' and Response Account .from Proposition l B. �' ' �-/ . ' ` . to Housing ' '-, ` �S�t for hearing -O4/24/O7. ' Monitor' O1/1O'' /O7 ' . S0 47(Pe,mtm) This bill will establish theeUgibUity, matching fund requirements, and .application process for Proposition 1 B funds ` under the $1 billion 'State -Local Partnership Program. The State -Local Partnership is ` to be administered, ` the California Transportation |Cornnnimsion (CTC). ' Referred, to Rules Committee ' 01/1 8/O7 ^ Monitor ' 01/1 0/07 F \... . ..... .... o.. .. .... - .. :.. n .a...i:. wv.wa. ro- .. y[, .. `� ara'ti � :.� A.tr xi4 ygg 2� >•", .. Y... h �a`t•.,�aa"ei?' «. .rr ;,>„s_ r.. :w. ,,. :. +A. .. .. .,. .,. ... ..:. .. . ....... .. . . ,..w uu..tr. :o-.trA t..eh a• x dS i.. .. r. i.� <.. .A. .. ., :• >Rrva' CN:: ...w''xi' .Yil>7 �••"''� apt ��a ��,, .. $ �a.:�� �\.¢?^ �. A5w 'r,a tr ...^1`g. a 'c: .a.. >.,. .^ .. *�> .dt'?r• ..': tr ..� a"R?.:A. ' 3. e,A'.. g'e'ii w?,`.�`:�'i. t'ZY§'� � ?�� %. � � f ..«, .,.:,: t,°^',aaa.:.t . :,:H fi..:si..;?e.::. 5� �,.. ,.... ti....• a ...: .. .. .. ... .a .,... .y ..s �a ,gr, <� 3' �, gnu ... .. ........ :... that will overall .quality to report programming system and life cycle agencies such : 4 i t .. , yS.' :•nrg. � � "�' ;j, ' y¢ 9 .�h�.. `�<L.Y k — ■ .M . s� � �R ''�`'� .:... .. .. .. : , . .. ...... -M,.n. x,F. ... �...$eytr... ": a. .c : Amended and re -referred to , ' Senate Transportation Housing Committee . Set for hearing 04/24/07. `'. ` `:: y$,.: ., i >'y :. ?str" . _ ..., .. Support ."4 .i Y.. `.. `efi' 1 (.;�.. id .tr.. \� :, y .... .. .. .... y 2/14/07 SB 53 (Ducheny) This bill requires Caltrans to establish performance measures. allow the department*to -issue an annual rating of the of 'the state highway system. Caltrans: would be. required to the Legislature on ho:w resource, staffing, and decisions impact ` the overall condition of the ,state highway (in terms of distressed lane miles, bridge conditions, costs).:_: SB 53 would require Caltrans to consult with as -RCTC.in developing its performance measures. SB 56 ;(Runner) .., :: This bill establishes a` 10=year pilot program for -design-build projects, administered: by the CTC Set for hearing 04/24/07 Support 2/14/07 SB 224 (Battin) This bill relinquishes state control of SR-1 1 1 and 'SR-79 to local Passed by Senate Support 04/1 1 /07 jurisdictions: SR-1 1 1 is relinquished within the city limits of La Quinta; Indian Wells, Indio, and Palm Desert. SR-79 is relinquished Transportation & Housing Committee; Referred to within the city limits of Temecula, San Jacinto and Hemet. Appropriations Committee - set for hearing 04/16/07 SB 872 This bill establishes the criteria for the State -Local Partnership Referred to Senate Support 04/1 1 /07 (Ackerman) program created when voters approved Proposition 1 B. The bill allocates $200 million`per, year statewide over five FY's beginning FY Transportation & Housing Committee .- set for hearing 10-11.' Funding goes only to self-help counties and to projects with a minimum cost of $25 million. 04/17/07; .. FEDERAL LEGISLATION . - - H.R. 1475 This bill equalizes.:.th`e fringe benefit :employers may offer their ` ,: Referred to House Ways &_ Support; ' 04/1 1 /07 , (McGovern,, _ D- employees tax -free:, -for transit reimbursement and parking _ Means Committee; Referred to MA) reimbursement to $200/month. Presently; employers may reimburse House Oversight and parking up to :$=175/month while "_transit may only be reimbursed up - . to $100/rnonth Government Reform Committee - 0.3/12/07 _ H.R. - ` 5576. This is the appropriations bill for the Departments. of Transportation, House and Senate reports Monitor 01 /10/07 (Rep.: Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, the Judiciary; :and the = _ issued: Knollenberg,- R� District of Columbia: The House and. Senate reports on this bill . ; . MI} :. contain a combined $6.5 million for Riverside County transportation - = projects, including: $3.0 million for the Perris Valley Line 'Metrol:ink - Extension: - F:\users\preprint\js\legmat:cloc