HomeMy Public PortalAbout09 September 24, 2007 Budget & Implementation80366
RECORDS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
MEETING AGENDA
TIME: 9:30 a.m.
DATE: Monday, September 24, 2007
LOCATION: BOARD ROOM
County of Riverside Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, 1" Floor, Riverside
***COMMITTEE MEMBERS***
Rick Gibbs, Chair / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta
Steve Adams, Vice Chair / Dom Betro, City of Riverside
Barbara Hanna / Brenda Salas, City of Banning
Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont
Joseph DeConinck / Charles Grotke, City of Blythe
Mary Craton / John Zaitz, City of Canyon Lake
Gregory S. Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City
Eduardo Garcia / Steven Hernandez, City of Coachella
Alex Bias / Yvonne Parks, City of Desert Hot Springs
Bob Magee / Robert L. Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore
Gordon Moller / Alan Seman, City of Rancho Mirage
Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula
John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside, District II
Jeff Stone, County of Riverside, District III
***STAFF***
Eric Haley, Executive Director
Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer
***AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY***
Annual Budget Development and Oversight
Countywide Strategic Plan
Legislation
Measure A Implementation and Capital Programs
Public Communications and Outreach Programs
Competitive Grant Programs: TEA 21-CMAQ & STP, Transportation Enhancement
and SB 821-Bicycle & Pedestrian
SAFE/Freeway Service Patrol
TUMF Program
and other areas as may be prescribed by the Commission
Comments are welcomed by the Committee. If you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please
complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
www.rctc.org
AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda
9:30 a.m.
Monday, September 24, 2007
BOARD ROOM
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, '1st Floor
Riverside, California
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section
54954. Z if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please
contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior
to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to
provid e accessibility at the meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3)
continuous minutes or less. The Committee may, either at the direction of
the Chair or by majority vote of the Committee, waive this three minute time
limitation. Depending on the, number of items on the Agenda and the number
of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each
speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. Also, the Committee may terminate
public comments if such comments become repetitious. In addition, the
maximum time for public comment for any individual item or .topic is thirty
(30) minutes. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the
consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented
to the Committee shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy
applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items.
Under the Brown Act, the Board should not take action on or discuss matters
raised during public comment portion of the agenda which are not listed on
the agenda. Board members may refer such matters to staff for factual
information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration.
Budget and Implementation Committee
September 24, 2007
Page 2
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — AUGUST 27, 2007
6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add an item to the Agenda
after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the
item and that the item came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to
the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires
2/3 vote of the Committee. If there are less than 2/3 of the Committee
members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous
Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.)
7.
CONSENT CALENDAR All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved
in a single motion unless 'a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on
specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for
discussion at the end of the agenda.
7A. FISCAL YEAR 2008-12 MEASURE A. FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ‘ROADS FOR 'THE
CITIES • OF BEAUMONT AND LAKE ELSINORE
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Approve the FY 2008-12 Measure A Five -Year Capital
Improvement Plans (CIP) for local streets and roads for the cities
of Beaumont and Lake Elsinore as submitted; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action:.
7B. FISCAL ` YEAR 2007/08 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR LOCAL STREETS AND
ROADS FOR THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Approve the amendment to the FY 2007/08 Measure A Five-Y.ear
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for local streets and roads for -the
city of Palm Springs as submitted; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
Budget and implementation Committee
September 24, 2007
Page 3
8.
AGREEMENTS FOR INTERNAL AUDIT SERVICES
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Approve the selection process and award Agreement No. 08-19-028-00
to KPMG LLP to perform internal audit services and on -call internal audit
services (at this time, the contract is still in negotiations and staff
expects to bring a final contract to the Commission meeting);
2) Award Agreement No. 08-19-029-00 to Thompson, Cobb, Bazilio &
Associates, P.C. and Agreement No. 08-19-030-00 to Mayer Hoffman
McCann P.C. to perform on -call internal audit services (at this time, the
contract is still in negotiations and staff expects to bring a final contract
to the Commission meeting);
3) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the
agreements on behalf of the Commission; and
4) Forward to the Commission for final action.
Page 15
9. 2009 MEASURE A $300 MILLION WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL
ARTERIAL CALL FOR PROJECTS
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
Page 18
1) Direct staff to release a Call for Projects for 2009 Measure A Western
Riverside County (Western County) funds in the amount of
$300 million;
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
10. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FEDERAL FUNDS ON
GENE AUTRY TRAIL WIDENING PROJECT
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
Page 28
1) Approve the Technical • Advisory. Committee ,(TAC) and staff
recommendation to increase federal Surface Transportation Program
(STP) funds on the Gene Autry Trail widening project from $1.54 million
to $4,038,020; and
2) Forward to the Commissionfor final action.
Budget and Implementation Committee
September 24, 2007
Page 4
11. AMENDMENT TO THE PROJECT SCOPE AND A PROJECT BUDGET
ADJUSTMENT WITH LIM AND NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORPORATION
TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS, .
SPECIFICATIONS, AND COST ESTIMATE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
'INTERSTATE 215/STATE ROUTE 60 EAST JUNCTION BETWEEN THE BOX
SPRINGS OVERCROSSING AND DAY STREET UNDERCROSSING
Page 32
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) . Approve an amendment to the project scope (Attachment .1). for the
I-215/SR-60 East Junction project and increase of the project budget
(Attachment 2) from $35.35 million to $55.742 million;
2) Approve Agreement No. 07-31-039-01, Amendment No. 1 to
Agreement No. 07-31-039-00, with Lim and Nascimento Engineering
Corporation (LAN) based on the negotiated project scope, schedule, and
cost that is attached to this agenda item for a base amount of
$1,533,452, plus 23.9% contingency amount of $366,548, to cover
potential changes in scope for a total not to exceed amount of $1.9
million [$1.682 million of federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
(CMAQ) program funds and $218,000 of Measure A as local match],
which addresses the additional design fees required for expansion of the
original project scope to incorporate elements from the Caltrans design
sequencing project and additional portions from the Segment : 7 project;
and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
12. AGREEMENT WITH PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP TO . PROVIDE
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES, PROJECT REPORT, AND
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO STATE ROUTE 91
IN THE EASTBOUND DIRECTION AND TO THE STATE ROUTE 71/91
INTERCHANGE, FROM APPROXIMATELY '/4 MILE WEST OF GREEN RIVER
ROAD TO SERFAS .CLUB DRIVE IN THE CITY OF CORONA
Page 42
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Award Agreement No. 08-31-015-00 to Parsons Transportation Group
to provide preliminary engineering services for the preparation of
Caltrans project report and environmental document (PRIED) for the
proposed improvements to SR-91, in the eastbound direction andto the
SR-71/91 Interchange, from approximately 1/4 .mile west of Green River
"
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
S e p t e m b e r 2 4 , 2 0 0 7
P a g e s
R o a d t o S e r f a s C l u b D r i v e i n t h e c i t y o f C o r o n a . A t t h i s t i m e , s t a f f i s
n e g o t i a t i n g w i t h " P a r s o n s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n G r o u p a n d s t a f f e x p e c t s t o
c o m p l e t e n e g o t i a t i o n s a n d b r i n g a f i n a l c o n t r a c t t o t h e O c t o b e r 1 0 ,
2 0 0 7 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g ;
2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e
a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d
3 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
1 3 . A G R E E M E N T W I T H S P O T L E S S J A N I T O R I A L S E R V I C E S T O " P R O V I D E
C L E A N I N G A N D G R O U N D S M A I N T E N A N C E F O R T H E F I V E M E T R O L I N K
S T A T I O N S I N R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y
O v e r v i e w
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
P a g e 4 5
1 ) A p p r o v e s e l e c t i o n o f a n d a w a r d A g r e e m e n t " N o . 0 8 - 2 4 - 0 2 3 - 0 0 t o
S p o t l e s s J a n i t o r i a l S e r v i c e s ( S J S ) t o p r o v i d e c l e a n i n g a n d g r o u n d s
m a i n t e n a n c e s e r v i c e s a t t h e f i v e C o m m i s s i o n - o w n e d ' M e t r o l i n k s t a t i o n s ; .
2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e . t h e
a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d
3 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
1 4 . S T A T E A N D F E D E R A L S T A T U S U P D A T E
O v e r v i e w
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
P a g e 4 7
1 ) A d o p t a n O P P O S E U N L E S S A M E N D E D p o s i t i o n o n S B 9 7 4 ( L o w e n t h a l ) ;
2 ) A d o p t p r o p o s e d a m e n d m e n t s t o S B 9 7 4 a n d a u t h o r i z e s t a f f t o t r a n s m i t
t h e a m e n d m e n t s t o s t a t e l e a d e r s ;
3 ) A p p r o v e a p r i o r i t y l i s t o f p r o j e c t s f o r f u n d i n g b y a n y c o n t a i n e r f e e
r e v e n u e ;
4 ) A d o p t a n O P P O S E p o s i t i o n o n t h e f o l l o w i n g f e d e r a l b i l l s :
a ) S . 2 0 1 9 ( H u t c h i s o n , R - T e x a s ) ; a n d
b ) H . R . . 3 5 1 0 ( P e t e r s o n , R - P e n n s y l v a n i a )
5 ) A d o p t a S U P P O R T p o s i t i o n o f " t h e S R - 2 4 1 F o o t h i l l S o u t h t o l l r o a d
e x t e n s i o n ;
6 ) R e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l L e g i s l a t i v e S t a t u s R e p o r t ; a n d
7 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l " a c t i o n .
Budget and Implementation Committee
September 24, 2007
Page 6
15. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA
16.. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT
Overview
This item provides the opportunity for the Commissionersand staff to report
on attended and upcoming meeting/conferences and issues related : to
Commission activities.
17. ADJOURNMENT:. AND: NEXT MEETING
The next Budget and .Implementation Committee meeting is scheduled to be
held at. 930 a.m., Monday, October 22, 2007, Board Chambers, 1'St Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside.
Riverside County Transportation Commission
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board
DATE: September 24, 2007
SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts of Interest Issues - Budget and Implementation Committee
Agenda of September 24, 2007
The September 24, 2007 agenda of the Budget and Implementation Committee includes items
which may raise possible conflicts of interest. An RCTC member may not participate in any
discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more
than $250 is received in the past 12 months from any entity or individual listed.
Agenda Item No. 8 - Agreements for Internal Audit Services
Consultant(s): KPMG LLP
Lynn Mackenzie
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Mayer Hoffman McMann P.C.
Marcus D. Davis
2301 Dupont Drive, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92612
Thompson, Cobb, Bazilio & Associates, P.C.
Michael J. deCastro
21250 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 500
Torrance, CA 90503
Agenda Item No. 11 - Amendment to the Project Scope, a Project Budget Adjustment with Lim
and Nascimento Engineering Corporation to Expand the Scope of the Development of Plans,
Specifications, and Cost Estimate for the Construction of the Interstate 215/State Route 60
East Junction Between the Box Springs Overcrossing and Day Street Undercrossing
Consultant(s): Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corp. Dokken Engineering
William Nascimento Richard Dokken
1887 Business Center Drive, #6 41707 Winchester Road
San Bernardino, CA 92408 #201
Temecula, CA 92590
Associated Engineers
Jim lmbiorski
3311 E. Shelby Street
Ontario, CA 91764
LIN Consulting
Denwun Lin
21660 E. Copley Drive, #270
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
LSA Associates
Lee Card
1650 Spruce Street, 5"' Floor
Riverside, CA 92507
Kleinfelder
Bart Patton
1220 Research Drive, #B
Redlands, CA 92374
Douglas Engineering
Douglas Mays
414 Tennessee Street, #G
Redlands, CA 92373
Agenda Item No. 12 - Agreement with Parsons Transportation Group to Provide Preliminary
Engineering Services, Project Report and Environmental Document for Improvements to
State Route 91, in the Eastbound Direction and to the State Route 71/91 Interchange, From
Approximately Y Mile West of Green River Road to Serfas Club Drive in the City of Corona
Consultant(s): Parsons Transportation Group
Khalil Saba
Parsons Project Manager
3602 Inland Empire Blvd.
Suite B-120
Ontario, CA 91764
Converse
Hashmi Quazi
10391 Corporate Drive
Redlands, CA 92374
Applied Earthworks, Inc.
Melinda Horne
3292 E Florida Avenue, Suite A
Hemet, CA 92544
Michael Brandman Associates
Dr. Tom McGill
621 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 100
San Bernardino, CA 92408
T. Y. Lin International
Gary Antonucci
3550 Vine Street, Suite 120
Riverside, CA 92507
Associated Engineers, Inc.
Jim lmbiorski
3311 E. Shelby Street
Ontario, CA 91764
Paragon Partners, Ltd.
Jim Rushing
5762 Boise Avenue, Suite 201
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Arellano Associates
Genoveva Arellano
4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 117
Chino, CA 91710
Tatsumi and Partners
David Tatsumi
5 Corporate Park, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92606-5166
Agenda Item No. 13 - Agreement with Spotless Janitorial Services to Provide Cleaning and
Grounds Maintenance for the Five Metrolink Stations in Riverside County
Consultant(s): Spotless Janitorial Services
Christina Lara
5416 Lauder Ct.
Riverside, CA 92507
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
ROLL CALL
SEPTEMBER 24, 2007
County of Riverside, District II
AtAr ytof R►uersi „,
City of Banning
1" ;ir11145147,1AF. itiwlPi;-tir
City of Blythe
a zr
ity,of.:Cany'on
City of Cathedral City
ityof aaflla ";,
Ivl
City of Desert Hot Springs
..,1>... »tCli,.....:..i'����I�
City of Murrieta
Q01E , a ,
City of Riverside
e l Itgeco
i"r=a
GTQ c1:30a.01
Presen Absent
O
ptcV j • os)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE SIGN -IN SHEET
SEPTEMBER 24, 2007
NAME
AGENCY
E MAIL ADDRESS
6i-
ergo /L 2
6.,a,,
��4
ki.
,,,,,,,,,
,
(zr„,, ,,,,,_,,_
--_-_--s-„,,,,, ,,,,,„
f-v r e
7,//kG,
AcT�
te--r,,..-
771 ����, Tom,A v
,e(Tz'
c� c.,- C ? i3 iu
ly u /1-4
/ ii T-y-
z_,- if Rut-r
et,e-p-1
�C'
UU'G CIS.
(-4 s7k, ,,
J
eye %5S%-t,
/iX di rf0.-i
q C ,�-
j�`
AGENDA ITEM 5
MINUTES
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N
B U D G E T A N D I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O M M I T T E E
M o n d a y , A u g u s t 2 7 , 2 0 0 7
M I N U T E S
1 . C A L L T O O R D E R
T h e m e e t i n g o f t h e B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e w a s c a l l e d t o
o r d e r b y C h a i r R i c k G i b b s a t 9 : 3 0 a . m . , i n t h e B o a r d R o o m a t t h e C o u n t y o f
R i v e r s i d e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C e n t e r , 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , F i r s t F l o o r , R i v e r s i d e ,
C a l i f o r n i a , 9 2 5 0 1 .
2 . P L E D G E O F A L L E G I A N C E
A t t h i s t i m e , C o m m i s s i o n e r S t e v e A d a m s l e d t h e B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n
C o m m i t t e e i n a f l a g s a l u t e .
3 . R O L L C A L L
M e m b e r s / A l t e r n a t e s . P r e s e n t M e m b e r s A b s e n t
S t e v e A d a m s
R o g e r B e r g
A l e x B i a s
M a r y C r a t o n
J o s e p h D e C o n i n c k
R i c k G i b b s
B o b M a g e e
G o r d o n M o l l e r
R o n R o b e r t s
J e f f S t o n e
J o h n T a v a g l i o n e
E d u a r d o G a r c i a
B a r b a r a H a n n a
G r e g o r y P e t t i s
4 . P U B L I C C O M M E N T S
T h e r e w e r e n o r e q u e s t s t o s p e a k f r o m t h e p u b l i c .
Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
August 27, 2007
Page 2
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 23 and June 25, 2007
M/S/C (Adams/Stone) to approve the minutes of April 23 and
June 25, 2007 as submitted.
. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS
There was a revision to Agenda Item 8, "2009 Measure A Local Streets and
Roads Maintenance of Effort Guidelines."
7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be
approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate
action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be
placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.
M/S/C (Craton/Stone) to approve the following Consent Calendar
item(s):
7A. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT
1) Receive and file the Interfund Loan ' Activity Report for the
fourth quarter ended June 30, 2007; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
7B. QUARTERLYINVESTMENT REPORT
1) Receive and file the Quarterly Investment .Report for the quarter
ended June '30, 2007; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
7C. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1) - Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the
fourth quarter ended June 30, 2007; and
2') Forward to the Commission forfinal action.
7D. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT
1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the
fourth quarter ended June 30, 2007; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
August 27, 2007
Page 3
8. 2009 MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM
MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES
Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, provided an overview of the
1989 Measure .A Local Streets and Roads Program Maintenance of Effort
guidelines and updated the Committee on the necessary revisions for the
2009 Measure A guidelines.
M/S/C (Stone/Roberts) to:
1) Approve the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Guidelines;
2) Adopt Resolution No. 07-011, "Resolution of the Riverside
County Transportation Commission Regarding the 2009
Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Maintenance of
Effort Guidelines;" and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
9. STATE ROUTE 60/INTERSTATE 215 EAST JUNCTION CONNECTORS
ADDITIONAL FUNDS REQUEST
Shirley Medina, Program Manager, presented an overview on the
SR-60/1-215 East Junction, which is the seventh segment of the design
sequencing project. She explained that in order to avoid repeated closures
and reduce impacts to the community, project elements were recently
shifted from the design sequencing project over to the SR-60/1-215 East
Junction project. She explained that upon completion of the design phase of
the SR-60/1-215 East Junction connectors, an increase in capital costs is
expected that will be brought to the Committee at that time.
Commissioner Bob Magee asked if the right-of-way needed for this project is
commercially zoned and if there are current appraisals for these properties.
Min Saysay, Right -of -Way Manager, replied that one of the properties that
will be acquired is an apartment building with approximately 17 units and
one small office, and the balance of the properties are commercial.
Appraisals will be secured pending the approval of this item. There is an
independent cost estimate, including relocation .and contingency.
Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
August 27, 2007
Page 4
M/S/C (Stone/Adams) to:
1) Approve $4 million of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
(CMAQ) program funds for the SR-60/215 East Junction
connectors project for the right-of-way phase;
2) Approve $459,000 of Measure A funds as match to the
$4 million CMAQ funds in the event it is needed;
3) Approve a budget amendment for a $4 million increase to
federal revenues in FY 2007/08;
4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel
review, :to sign associated amendment agreements- to reflect
additional funding; and
5) Forward to the Commission for final action.
10. ADDITIONAL FUNDS REQUEST FOR STATE ROUTE 60/VALLEY WAY: TO
INTERSTATE 15 PROJECT
Shirley Medina presented the need for additional funds due to unforeseen
conditions causing additional work on the SR-60 widening project from Valley
Way to Interstate 15. The project is scheduled for completion in
January 2009.
M/S/C (Adams/Stone) to:
1)Approve an additional $1.5 million of . Congestion Mitigation and
Air Quality (CMAQ). program funds for the SR-60/Valley Way to
1-15 high occupancy vehicle and mixed flow gap closure project
2) Authorize the Executive Director, : pursuant to legal counsel
review, to sign associated amendment agreements to reflect
additional funding; and
3) Forward to the Commission :for final action.
11. FISCAL YEAR 2008-12. MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT.
PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITIES OF CALIMESA,
MURRIETA, AND NORCO
Jerry Rivera, Program Manager, provided a brief overview of the FY 2008-12
Measure A Five -Year .Capital 'Improvement Plans (CIP) for local streets and
roads for the cities of Calimesa, Murrieta and 'Norco.
"
"
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e M i n u t e s
A u g u s t 2 7 , 2 0 0 7
P a g e 5
M / S / C ( S t o n e / A d a m s ) t o :
1 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y 2 0 0 8 - 1 2 M e a s u r e A f i v e - Y e a r C a p i t a l
I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n s ( C I P ) f o r l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s f o r t h e
c i t i e s o f C a l i m e s a , M u r r i e t a , a n d N o r c o a s s u b m i t t e d ; a n d
2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
1 2 . F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 0 7 - 1 1 M E A S U R E A F I V E - Y E A R C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T
P L A N F O R L O C A L S T R E E T S A N D R O A D S F O R T H E C I T Y O F C A L I M E S A
J e r r y R i v e r a p r o v i d e d a b r i e f o v e r v i e w o f t h e c i t y o f C a l i m e s a ' s F Y ' 2 0 0 7 - 1 1
M e a s u r e A F i v e - Y e a r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n .
M / S / C ( S t o n e / A d a m s ) t o :
1 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y 2 0 0 7 - 1 1 M e a s u r e - A f i v e - Y e a r C a p i t a l
I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ( C I P ) f o r l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s f o r t h e c i t y
o f C a l i m e s a a s s u b m i t t e d ; a n d
2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
1 3 . A M E N D M E N T T O F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 0 7 - 1 1 M E A S U R E A C A P I T A L
I M P R O V E M E N T P L A N F O R L O C A L S T R E E T S A N D R O A D S F O R T H E C I T Y O F
C O R O N A
J e r r y R i v e r a p r o v i d e d a b r i e f o v e r v i e w o n a n a m e n d m e n t f o r t h e c i t y o f
C o r o n a ' s 2 0 0 7 - 1 1 M e a s u r e A C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n .
M / S / C ( S t o n e / A d a m s ) t o :
1 ) A p p r o v e t h e a m e n d m e n t t o t h e F Y 2 0 0 7 - 1 1 M e a s u r e A C a p i t a l
I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n . f o r l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s f o r t h e c i t y o f
C o r o n a a s s u b m i t t e d a n d
2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
1 4 . A G R E E M E N T N O . 0 8 - 3 3 - 0 1 1 - 0 0 F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N M A N A G E M E N T
S E R V I C E S T O S U P P O R T T H E N O R T H M A I N C O R O N A P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E
A N D T H E P E R R I S M U L T I M O D A L F A C I L I T Y A N D A U T H O R I Z A T I O N T O
A D V E R T I S E F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N B I D S F O R T H E N O R T H M A I N C O R O N A
P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E A N D T H E P E R R I S M U L T I M O D A L F A C I L I T Y
E d d a R o s s o , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r , p r e s e n t a t i o n t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n t o a w a r d
a n a g r e e m e n t f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n r n a n a g e m e n t s e r v i c e s f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f
t h e N o r t h M a i n C o r o n a p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e a n d t h e P e r r i s M u l t i m o d a l F a c i l i t y .
Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
August 27, 2007
Page 6
She explained that staff is also seeking approval for; the -authorization to _
advertise to receive bids for the construction of these facilities pending
federal authorization.
M/S/C (Adams/Stone) to:
1) Direct staff to present its award recommendation and notice to
proceed to the Commission for Agreement No. 08-33-011-00
for construction management services to support the
construction of the North Main Corona parking structure in the
city of =:Corona and the Perris Multimodal Facility in the city of
Perris;
2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
execute Agreement No. 08-33-011-00 on behalf of the
Commission;
3) Authorize staff to advertise to receive bids for the construction
of the North Main Corona parking structure: in the city of Corona
and the Perris Multimodal Facility in the city of Perris,
contingent on federal funding authorization; and
4) Forward to the Commission for final action.
15.. AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF
QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON -CALL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR FOR THE
METROLINK STATIONS
Min Saysay provided an overview on the authorization to issue a request for
statement of qualifications (SOQ) for an on -call maintenance contractor for
the Metrolink stations.
Commissioner ,Ro;ger. Berg requested clarification on the process to determine
the :most responsive "contractor. Commissioner Bergexpressed concern that
the contractor's costs should be uniformly provided so that there are
parameters to follow,
Min Saysay replied that staff is currently developing a list of services
required and the costs will be negotiated prior to the execution of the
contract'.. ,He explained that criteria are being developed for all the required
services for, :the five Metrolink stations and the request for proposal will be.
published and a contract will be awarded. He explained that a checklist has
been : developed in order to inspect the stations on a regular basis to ensure
the work has been satisfactorily delivered.
Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
August 27, 2007
Page 7
Commissioner Jeff Stone stated his appreciation for Commissioner Berg's
concern as the Commission needs to control costs. He expressed that this
item is a qualitative request to find a contractor that has the qualifications do
to the multi -tasking necessary to maintain the Metrolink stations. He
indicated to Commissioner Berg that his concerns will be addressed at a later
time. The goal of this action is to find the contractors that are qualified to
perform the work.
Commissioners Bob Magee and Gordon Moller concurred with Commissioner
Berg's concerns.
Min Saysay concurred that the Commissioners' concerns will be considered.
Commissioner Stone expressed that all of the Commissioners' comments
have been well received. He noted the Commission has the authority to
award a contract to the next qualified contractor with cost effective rates
should the most qualified contractor propose unreasonable rates.
Min Saysay replied that staff will return to the Commission to present the
rankings on the contractors that respond to the SOQ along with the
qualifications and the hourly costs.
M/S/C (Stone/Adams) to:
1) Direct staff to develop and advertise a request for SOQ for
on -call maintenance contractor services for the five Metrolink
commuter rail stations;
2) form a selection committee comprised of Commission and
Metrolink staff to review, evaluate, and rank all SOQs received;
3) Authorize staff to negotiate a contract with the top -ranked .
contractor and bring back a recommendation to the Commission
for contract award; and
4) Forward to the Commission for final action.
No: Berg
16. INTERSTATE 215 B1-COUNTY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — INCREASE IN
FUNDING FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT WORK
Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director, presented an overview and
background information on the need to: increase funding from $2 million to
$4 million for the Interstate 215 Bi-County improvement project. The total
project cost is now estimated at $11.5 millionwith a schedule of completion
in August 2012.
Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
August 27, 2007
Page 8
M/S/C (Adams/Craton) to:
1) Authorize an increase in funding from $ 2 million .to $4 million
for the development of a project report and environmental
document (PR/ED) for the 1-215 Bi-County improvement project; .
and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
17. STATE AND FEDERAL STATUS REPORT
John <Standiford, Public Affairs Director, announced that the state budget
has been approved and provided an overview of ;its transportation provisions
and trailer bills, including the spillover account, Proposition. 1 B, and SB 9
(Lowenthal). He noted that Executive Director Eric Haley was in Sacramento
meeting with Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency Secretary 'Dale
Bonner to discuss the implementation of SB 9. He briefed the Committee on
federal transportation issues and the passage :of the defense appropriations
bill, which may impact the SR-241 toll road extension.
Commissioner Steve Adams expressed concern for supporting a project in
another county when the Commission does not ° have all the necessary
information and opposed supporting the SR-241 toll road'' extension.
'Commissioner Adams also expressed concern regarding the representation in
Sacramento for Riverside County and questioned its strength.
Commissioner Roger Berg expressed his belief that the toll roadextension is
necessary and supports its development.
Commissioner John Tavaglione asked if the Transportation .Corridor Agencies
(TCA) have asked the Commission for formal support and if; Orange County.
Transportation Authority (OCTA) also supports the toll road extension.
He suggested not taking a position until the Commission is formally asked to
do so and if OCTA is in support, he suggested the Commission take a formal
position in support.
John Standiford replied that the TCA has not formally asked the Commission
to take a position and it is uncertain if OCTA has taken a formal position, .
Commissioner Ron Roberts expressed concern about this particular route and
the controversy in South Orange County and opposition to a support position
on the toll road extension unless the Commission is formally asked for its
support.
"
"
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e M i n u t e s
A u g u s t 2 7 , 2 0 0 7
P a g e 9
C o m m i s s i o n e r A d a m s c o n c u r r e d w i t h C o m m i s s i o n e r T a v a g l i o n e ' s c o m m e n t s .
C o m m i s s i o n e r B o b M a g e e a l s o c o n c u r r e d w i t h C o m m i s s i o n e r T a v a g l i o n e ' s
c o m m e n t s . W i t h r e s p e c t t o C o m m i s s i o n e r A d a m s ' c o m m e n t s a b o u t
t h e l a c k o f s t r e n g t h o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y l e g i s l a t o r s , h e s t a t e d t h a t
A s s e m b l y m e n K e v i n J e f f r i e s a n d J o h n B e n o i t h a v e g o n e o u t o f t h e i r w a y t o
a s s i s t t h e c o m m u n i t y i n S o u t h w e s t R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y i n d o i n g t h e r i g h t t h i n g s
w i t h r e s p e c t t o t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d m o v i n g C a ! t r a n s f o r w a r d .
J o h n S t a n d i f o r d s u g g e s t e d w i t h d r a w i n g S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n N o . 1 ,
" A d o p t a S U P P O R T p o s i t i o n f o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e F o o t h i l l - - S o u t h
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o r r i d o r ( S t a t e R o u t e 2 4 1 ) i n O r a n g e C o u n t y " a s i t w a s b a s e d
o n a n i n f o r m a l r e q u e s t . S t a f f w i l l v e r i f y O C T A ' s p o s i t i o n a n d b r i n g t h i s
r e c o m m e n d a t i o n b a c k a t t h e n e x t C o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g .
C o m m i s s i o n e r S t o n e r e c o m m e n d e d t a b l i n g S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n N o . 1 u n t i l
a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n i s p r o v i d e d t o t h e C o m m i t t e e t o m a k e a n i n f o r m e d
d e c i s i o n o n t h i s r e c o m m e n d a t i o n .
M / S / C ( S t o n e / M a g e e ) t o :
1 ) R e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l L e g i s l a t i v e S t a t u s R e p o r t
a s a n i n f o r m a t i o n i t e m ; a n d
2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
1 8 . I T E M S P U L L E D F R O M C O N S E N T C A L E N D A R
N o i t e m s w e r e p u l l e d f r o m t h e c o n s e n t c a l e n d a r f o r d i s c u s s i o n .
1 9 . C O M M E N T S B Y C O M M I S S I O N E R S / S T A F F
1 9 A . C h a i r R i c k G i b b s c o m m e n d e d C o m m i s s i o n e r M a g e e f o r h i s S t a t e o f t h e
C i t y a d d r e s s f o r L a k e E l s i n o r e .
"
A G E N D A I T E M 7 A
"
"
R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
S e p t e m b e r 2 4 , 2 0 0 7
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
J e r r y R i v e r a , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r
T H R O U G H :
A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 8 - 1 2 M e a s u r e A F i v e - Y e a r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t
P l a n s f o r L o c a l S t r e e t s a n d R o a d s f o r t h e C i t i e s o f B e a u m o n t a n d
L a k e E l s i n o r e
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
1 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y 2 0 0 8 - 1 2 M e a s u r e A F i v e - Y e a r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t
P l a n s ( C I P ) f o r l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s f o r t h e c i t i e s o f B e a u m o n t a n d
L a k e E l s i n o r e a s s u b m i t t e d ; a n d
2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
M e a s u r e A r e q u i r e s e a c h r e c i p i e n t o f l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s m o n i e s t o a n n u a l l y
p r o v i d e t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a f i v e - y e a r p l a n o n h o w t h o s e f u n d s a r e t o b e e x p e n d e d
i n o r d e r t o r e c e i v e i t s M e a s u r e A d i s b u r s e m e n t s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e C o a c h e l l a . V a l l e y
a n d W e s t e r n C o u n t y c i t i e s a n d t h e c o u n t y m u s t p a r t i c i p a t e i n e i t h e r t h e C o a c h e l l a
V a l l e y A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s ( C V A G ) o r W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n c i l o f
G o v e r n m e n t s ( W R C O G ) T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e ( T U M F ) p r o g r a m .
T h e a g e n c i e s a r e r e q u i r e d t o s u b m i t t h e a n n u a l c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f m a i n t e n a n c e o f
e f f o r t ( M O E ) a l o n g w i t h d o c u m e n t a t i o n s u p p o r t i n g t h e c a l c u l a t i o n .
O n A p r i l 2 0 , 2 0 0 7 , C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f p r o v i d e d t h e l o c a l a g e n c i e s w i t h M e a s u r e A
r e v e n u e p r o j e c t i o n s f o r l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s t o a s s i s t t h e m i n p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h e
r e q u i r e d C I P . T h e a g e n c i e s w e r e a s k e d t o s u b m i t t h e i r C I P s b y J u n e 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 , f o r
s u b m i s s i o n t o t h e B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e a t i t s J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 7
m e e t i n g a n d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n o n J u l y 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 .
T h e C o m m i s s i o n h a s p r e v i o u s l y a p p r o v e d t h e p l a n s f o r a l l b u t t h r e e c i t i e s . S t a f f
h a s r e c e i v e d t h e r e q u i r e d C I P , M O E a n d s u p p o r t i n g d o c u m e n t a t i o n f r o m t h e c i t i e s
o f B e a u m o n t a n d L a k e E l s i n o r e a n d i s r e q u e s t i n g C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v a l o f t h e i r
C I P s . S t a f f h a s n o t i f i e d t h e r e m a i n i n g c i t y , D e s e r t H o t S p r i n g s , t h a t n o
A g e n d a I t e m 7 A
disbursement of Measure A funds for Focal streets and roads will be made until all
of i the required documents have been received and approved by the Commission.
Attachment: Measure A Capital Improvement Plans for Beaumont and Lake
Elsinore
Agenda Item 7A
2
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M
F Y 2 0 0 7 / 2 0 0 8 - 2 0 1 1 / 2 0 1 2
A g e n c y : C i t y o f B e a u m o n t
P r e p a r e d b y : P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t
D a t e : F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 0 7
P a g e 1 o f 1
F i s c a l
Y e a r
P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S
P R O J E C T T Y P E
T O T A L
C O S T
S T A T U S
M E A S U R E
" A "
2 0 0 6 / 2
0 0 7
a n d
2 0 0 7 / 2
0 0 8
P a l m A v e n u e , 6 t h S t r e e t t o O a k
V a l l e y P a r k w a y
R e h a b i l i t a t i o n
$ 3 , 0 8 7 , 0 0 0
U n d e r
C o n s t r u c t i o n
$ 9 4 6 , 0 0 0
2 0 0 8 / 2
0 0 9
P e n n s y l v a n i a A v e n u e , 6 ` h S t r e e t t o
O a k V a l l e y P a r k w a y
R e h a b i l i t a t i o n
$ 9 5 0 , 0 0 0
U n d e r D e s i g n
$ 5 0 0 , 0 0 0
2 0 0 9 / 2
0 1 0
8 t h S t r e e t , E l m A v e n u e t o H i g h l a n d
S p r i n g s A v e n u e
R e h a b i l i t a t i o n
$ 1 , 2 0 0 , 0 0 0
P e n d i n g D e s i g n
$ 5 2 5 , 0 0 0
2 0 1 0 / 2
0 1 1
B r o o k s i d e A v e n u e , H i g h l a n d
S p r i n g s A v e n u e t o B e a u m o n t A v e .
R e h a b i l i t a t i o n
$ 7 0 0 , 0 0 0
P e n d i n g D e s i g n
$ 5 5 . 0 , 0 0 0
2 0 1 1 / 2
0 1 2
O a k V a l l e y P a r k w a y , B e a u m o n t
A v e n u e t o C h e r r y A v e n u e
R e h a b i l i t a t i o n
$ 7 5 0 , 0 0 0
P e n d i n g D e s i g n
$ 5 7 5 , 0 0 0
3
LO- 4E-8 -yainseaW1 eox3wowoios enechkueVn
4 a6ed
08
-
0£L
- suoneaed
pus aoueueluleW wails
_
eppviAn-epueuaXwaW nealls
g
99Z -
96E _
_
sluawen udwi halls
amid Jesei�
:uoprulsuooeb i(empeo l muewenoadwl efieuleao
9
66
86.6'Z -
slua.wenoidwl Aemi461H pue leans
swawanoudw{ wualul a6ueyoaam S611bL8S
ti
£6
001.
spue6ei pue 6uldpls owe4 ule}u!eW
wekoad 6u1d01S Vail lenuuy
£
oe
001,
weboad
eme ue ieimp. %lino
ail P!S P
_
wekoa memo i pu+e aaun� cpn enuu
d p.S � f v
Z
000' f. -
000' G
_
uonemlgegat!
- .- '8 uon.oni suooaa lean
ePlmAlo - wekoid wewa6eueW wawene d
I.(S.00Os)
saNn4
..y.. 321f svmv` ..
-
-�S.Ooos}
_ . S1S03'viol `�
3dA.1
_.._ _ _ 133roud
SlIWI1
/31/11bN 1g3('0114 . � ; _ - ..
'ON
1/311
9 a6ed
•
L016£/90 :e}ea
On '1xe VZ 6£-t7L9 (I.96) ..0N auoud
aeaul6u3 A.la - olewnes ue>i :rtg paiedaid
aiou!se 10 APO :t(oue6y
900Z • LOOZ AJ
INVIIJOad SaNnA wool ..v.. 32I11811341
NOISSIWW03 NOIl'd121OdSNbILl AlNnoo 30I9213AIN
•
•
1.0-L£-8 -veunseaW1 eox3wowolos enepu61.19V1
z e6ed .
08
5LL
suol;eaedp
pue eoueua;uiew ;aaa;S
eplivut;,lo-eoueuelulevy wags
�b
£6
OOl
spueBei 6u!cluls og.jea; ulemew
weiBoad 6uld!a1S lenuuy
E
08
000'
(S.000$) SaNnA
..v„ aanse3W.
001,
000'
ts0oos)
S1SOO 1%9101
aleda� memern pue aagno ` pno
uope;lllgege
'8 uol;ona;suooed ;seals
3dAl
103POad
wei6a,d >Hameln pue aaune `41110 lenuuy
eporvtpo - wea6oad;uawa6eueil;uetuened
- - l
Simn
/3WbN 1o3f dtid
Z
i
'ON
W311.
S }o Z e6ed
L0/ 6 £L80 ::alga
ttZ 'tea tZ I.E-tL9 (6S6) VON euo4d
Jaau16u3- alewneS ueN peaedeud
aaoutsl3 alai Jo /go :rtous6y
600Z • 800Z A -
VIM:1001M saNnd "w oo• ivia aanSb3W -
NOISSIWW00 NOLLVINOdSNVNI. A1Nn0o 3aIMAIN
LO.6£-8 -yainseaWil uawowopS enechiaua1: f
c a6ed
_
0.8
08L
_ suoneaedp
pue aoueueluieN leads
epuuitpo-eoueualuleW wails
tp
£6
0M
spue6ai pue Bulduis puleal umuiBN
weafioad 6u1dAS °WU lenuuy
£
08
001.
aiedel miemen pue Janno'gmO
weabad 5liennap1S pue aeMe `WO lenuuy'
Z
000` I,
000` L
uonemigeyeN
ig uoporulsuooeN ;awls
ep!mA110 - wei6o.Jd lue uefieueN Wewened
r' �
(s.000s) SaNn4
..b'.. 321f1Sd3W
(s.000s) _
S1S03 11/101
3dAl
-�. 103f 0Nd
SIIINI1
l3WYN 133f 02ld
.ON
I11t311
910 £ e fled
L0l6£/90 :81e0
t n. 11xe 17Z 1.£17L9 (1.86) :,oN euoud
Jeeui6u3 �t1tO - olewnes ueN :As peiedald
wows 8518110 A)10 :Aouafiy
01.0Z - 600Z
WVIOOad saNnd -wool ..v.. 32Insvmm
NOISSIWWOO NO11d12IOdSNAN1 AiNnOO 30ISb3Ala
•
l0* G£*$-yaanseawij93x31uowoIos eAaav6uaN:
09
06L
suoReaado
pue eoueuemew Man
eoueueluleW lases
b
s6
spue6el pule 6urdAs or}}eil ulelulevg
wei6old 6ulcips areal lenuuy £
08
000' I.
001
000' I.
(S.p00s) SONnd (si000s)
..H.. minSb3W SiSOo '1t/101
medal Niemen pue Jauno `cm°
uoReplrgeye i
uNonalsuooaa walls
3dAl
1o3Ps:Nld
a1ed8U NIeMein Pue Anne `grno lenuuy Z
aplNANo - Lue.s6oid puewe6euevy wewened
S11W1'1 'ON
/3WYN 1o3f oad W31t'
SioeBed
/0/6E/90 :ale°
fi7Z 'We trZI.E17l9 (1,56) :•oN euoild
Jeaupu3 - (memos uayl :As paaedaad
aaouisl3 8)18110 :Aoue6y
1.1.0Z • O 1.0Z AA
umootld saNnd ivo0'1..1f.. 32lnsv3W
NOISSIWWOo NOIlb1210dSNIALL A1NnOo 301S113AIN
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M
F Y 2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2
A g e n c y : C i t y o f L a k e E l s i n o r e
P r e p a r e d B y : K e n S e u m a l o - C i t y E n g i n e e r
P h o n e N o . : ( 9 5 1 ) 6 7 4 - 3 1 2 4 e x t , 2 4 4
D a t e : 0 8 / 3 1 / 0 7
P a g e 5 o f 5
"
I T E M
N O .
_ . .
P R O J E C T N A M E /
L I M I T S
P R O J E C T
T Y P E
T O T A L C O S T S
( E 0 0 0 ' S )
M E A S U R E " A "
F U N D S W O O ' S )
- 1
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m - C i t y w i d e
S t r e e t R e c o n s t r u c t i o n &
R e h a b i l i t a t i o n
1 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 0 0
2
A n n u a l C u r b , G u t t e r a n d S i d e w a l k R e p a i r
C u r b , G u t t e r a n d S i d e w a l k r e p a i r
1 0 0
8 0
3
A n n u a l T r a f f i c S t r i p i n g P r o g r a m
M a i n t a i n t r a f f i c s t r i p i n g a n d l e g e n d s
1 0 0
9 3
4
S t r e e t M a i n t e n a n c e
S t r e e t M a i n t e n a n c e a n d
O p e r a t i o n s
8 0 0
8 0
P a g e 5
U : l e n g r 1 D a v e S o l o m o n \ E x c e l \ M e a s u r e A - 8 - 3 1 - 0 7
AGENDA ITEM 713
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
September 24, 2007
TO:
Budget and Implementation Committee
FROM:
Jerry Rivera, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Fiscal Year 2007/08 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement
Plan Amendment for Local Streets and Roads for the City of
Palm Springs
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Approve the amendment to the FY 2007/08 Measure A Five -Year
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for local streets and roads for the city
of Palm Springs as submitted; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Measure A requires each recipient of local streets and roads monies to annually
provide to the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended
in order to receive its Measure A disbursements. In addition, the Coachella Valley
and Western County cities and the county must participate in either the Coachella
Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) or Western Riverside Council of
Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program.
The agencies are also required to submit an annual certification of maintenance of
effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation.
The CIP for the city of Palm Springs (City) was approved by the Commission at its
July 11, 2007 meeting. Any revisions to the adopted plan must be returned to the
Commission for approval. The City applied for and received grant funding for the
signal at Indian Canyon Drive/Tamarisk Road. Therefore, the City is requesting to
amend its FY 2007/08 CIP to move funding from the Indian/Tamarisk signal project
to the next project on its priority list, the Sunrise Way at Alejo Road signal project.
Attachment: Letter from the City of Palm Springs with Revised CIP Schedule
Agenda Item 7B
9
81666 JR
City of Palm Springs
Department of Public Works and Engineering
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs, California 92262
Tel: (760) 323-8253 • Fax: (760) 322-8360 • Web: rvww.ci.palm-springs.ca_us
September 7, 2007 D E C E l n Via Facsimile: (951) 787-7920
Mr. Jerry Rivera - SEP 112007
Measure "A" Program Manager
Riverside County Transportation, CommisfINRSIDE COUNTY
4080 Lemon Street, 3"' Floor TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Riverside, CA 92502-2208
Re: Fiscal Year 2008-2012, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Road Program
Proposed City of Palm Springs Annual 5-Year Measure "A" Plan
(Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Continued, Fiscal Year 2007/2008) — REVISED
Dear Mr. Rivera:
I am enclosing the first revision to the Measure A lists for funds that are listed on the "2006/2007
continued to 2007/2008" Table and the "2007/2008" Table for Fiscal Year 2008-2012 5-Year Plan.
The City applied for and received a 2006/2007 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant
in the amount of $217,809 for.construction of a. new traffic signal at Indian Canyon Drive/Tamarisk
Road. This.signat is,ciarreritly.programmed with Local Measure A funding. ft is our intent to move
the majority of tocal.Meastire A funds originally programmed for the Indian/Tamarisk signal to the
next signal modification project on our.priority list: Sunrise Way at Alejo Road.
Therefore, we are requesting concurrence on the reduction of Local Measure A funds for the
"Indian Canyon Drive/Tamarisk Road Traffic Signal ($199,158.65 Local Measure A funds
continued)'to apply towards'a new project "Sunrise Way/Alejo Road Traffic Signal Modification" for
the 2007/2008 fiscal year.
Please review the information and let me know if you have any further questions. I can be reached
at (760) 323-8253, ext. 8744.
Sincerely,
GLt�v
arcus L. Fuller, P.E., P.L.S.
Assistant Director- of PublicWorks/Assistant City Engineer
enc
cc
'Winds Misch, Assistant City Manager -
David paratcian, Director of PubligWotaseplyenjineer
-Craig Graves, DirectorofFigance/Treasurer,
•
Post Office Box 2743 • Palm 1 prings, California 92263-2743
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M
A g e n c y : C i t y o f P a l m S p r i n g s
P r e p a r e d b y : D a v i d J , B a r a k i a n , D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / C i t y E n g i n e e r
( b y M a r c u s L . F u l l e r , A s s i s t a n t D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / A s s i s t a n t C i t y E n g i n e e r )
D a t e : J u n e 1 , ' 2 0 0 7
S e p t e m b e r 7 , 2 0 0 7 ( R e v i s i o n 1 )
F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 8 - 2 0 1 2 , 5 - Y e a r M e a s u r e " A " L o c a l S t r e e t & R o a d s P r o g r a m
F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 6 / 2 0 0 7 c o n t i n u e d t o 2 0 0 7 / 2 0 0 8
"
I T E M
N O .
��. _ _ . , . _ . v
P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S
T w a r . a r
P R O J E C T T Y P E
T O T A L
C O S T , .
M E A S U R E " A "
F U N D S
1 .
_ -
A n n u a l . S t r e e t S l u r S e a l s - C o n t r a c t
S l u r r y }
( R e m a i n i n g f u n d s t o b e u s e d w i t h n e x t y e a r ' s p r o j e c t )
S t r e e t M a i n t e n a n c e
$ 6 , 1 5 6
$ 6 , 1 5 6
2 ' `
B r i d g e R e p a i r s r
( R e m a i n i n g f u n d s t o b e u s e d w i t h f u t u r e p r o j e c t }
B r i d g e M a i n t e n a n c e
$ 1 0 3 , 4 8 8 . 6 1
$ 1 0 3 , 4 8 8 . 6 1
3 "
B e l a r d o R o a d B r i d g e
( C u r r e n t l y i n e n v i r o n m e n t a l p h a s e )
N e w R o a d E x t e n s i o n a n d B r i d g e
C o n s t r u c t i o n
$ 4 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 2 9 9 ; 0 2 1 . 8 0
I n d i a n C a n y o n D r i v e W i d e n i n g ( U P R R t o G a r n e t A v e ) .
( C u r r e n t l y i n e n v i r o n m e n t a l p h a s e )
R o a d w a y a n d B r i d g e W i d e n i n g
$ 4 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 2 3 3 , 8 5 9 . 2 2
' ( C u r r e n t l y
I n d i a n A v e n u e / I - 1 0 I n t e r c h a n g e
i n r i g h t - o f - w a y p h a s e )
E x p a n d e d F r e e w a y I n t e r c h a n g e
$ 2 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 8 0 6 , 9 6 3 . 5 8
6 "
G e n e A u t r y T r a i l / I - 1 0 I n t e r c h a n g e
( C u r r e n t l y i n r i g h t - o f - w a y p h a s e ) .
E x p a n d e d F r e e w a y I n t e r c h a n g e
$ 2 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 5 9 5 , 3 1 8 . 6 8 '
7
G e n e A u t r y T r a i l U P R R B r i d g e W i d e n i n g
( C u r r e n t l y i n e n v i r o n m e n t a l p h a s e )
B r i d g e W i d e n i n g
$ 5 ; 0 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 6 1 0 0 0
a
I n d i a n C a n y o n D r i v e U P R R B r i d g e W i d e n i n g
Y 9 9
B r i d g e W i d e n i n g
* I n c l u d e d i n
I t e m 4 a b o v e
$ 1 8 9 , 8 3 0 . 3 4
9
I n d i a n C a n y o n D r i v e W i d e n i n g ( T r a m v i e w R o a d t o U P R R )
( C u r r e n t l y i n e n v i r o n m e n t a l p h a s e )
R o a d w a y W i d e n i n g
9
$ 3 3 0 0 0 0 0
$ 1 4 9 8 1 9 . 9 1
P a 9 e 1 o f 2
Fiscal Year 2008-2012, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Roads Program
Fiscal Year 2006/2007 continued to 2007/2008
ITEM
NO.
-
PROJECT NAME/LIMITS
_:.
PROJECT TYPE
TOTAL.
COST
MEASURE "A"
FUNDS
10.
Gene Autry Trail Widening. (Vista Chino to UPRR)
(Engineering complete; bidding scheduled in Summer 2007)
Roadway Widening
$4,446,000
$794,620.31
1,1.
ARHM Street Overlays (Construction)
(Remaining fundstobe used with -nextyear s project)
Street Maintenance
$288,259.83
- . $288,259.83
• 12.
Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation •
(Initiating Consultant Selection Process) .
Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation
$4,888,950
$150,000
13..
Raman Widening Study
(El Cielo Road to Sunrise Way)
.
Planning Study
$100,000
$50,000
14.
SB 821.Sidewalk Project (FY 06/07)
En ineerin complete; bidding underway)Sidewalk
{ 9� g P 9
Construction
$73,000
$25,188.29
15.
Indian Canyon Drive/Tamarisk Road Traffic Signal
Signal Installation
$200,000
$25,158.65
• •
;v 4
TOTAL 2006/2007 CONTINUED
TO 2007/2008
$77,205,854.44
$3,778,685.22
Note: These are .current RCTC approved Fiscal Year 2006/2007 (and prior) projects that need to be "continued„ to Fiscal Year 2007/2008.
Note: Measure A funding amounts are existing budgeted amounts as of May 31, 2007.
Revision 1 Transfer $174,000 Measure "A" funds for new traffic signal project in 2007/2008 {see other sheet).
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M
A g e n c y : C i t y o f P a l m S p r i n g s
P r e p a r e d b y : D a v i d J . B a r a k i a n , D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / C i t y E n g i n e e r
( b y M a r c u s L . F u l l e r , A s s i s t a n t D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / A s s i s t a n t C i t y E n g i n e e r )
D a t e : J u n e 1 , 2 0 0 7
S e p t e m b e r 7 , 2 0 0 7 ( R e v i s i o n 1 )
F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 8 - 2 0 1 2 , 5 - Y e a r M e a s u r e " A " L o c a l S t r e e t & R o a d s P r o g r a m .
F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 7 / 2 0 0 8
I T E M
_ . N O :
" P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S I M I T S
P R O J E C T T Y P E
T O T A L
C O S T
M E A S U R E " A "
F U N D S
4 . "
A R H M O v e r l a y s ( C o n s t r u c t i o n )
S t r e e t M a i n t e n a n c e
$ 5 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 5 0 0 , 0 0 0
2 . .
A n n u a l S t r e e t S l u r r y S e a l s ( C o n s t r u c t i o n )
S t r e e t M a i n t e n a n c e
$ 5 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 5 0 0 , 0 0 0
3 .
G e n e A u t r y T r a i l 1 I n t e r s t a t e 1 0 I n t e r c h a n g e
( f u n d i n g t o b e a d d e d t o r e q u i r e d C i t y m a t c h
q t Y )
E x p a n d e d F r e e w a y I n t e r c h a n g e
. * I n c l u d e d o n
p r e v i o u s s h e e t
$ 4 0 0 , 0 0 0
4 .
B e l a r d o R o a d B r i d g e
( f u n d i n g t o b e a d d e d t o r e q u i r e d C i t y m a t c h )
N e w R o a d E x t e n s i o n a n d B r i d g e
C o n s t r u c t i o n
* I n c l u d e d o n
p r e v i o u s s h e e t
0 0 , 0 0 0
5 .
S u n r i s e W a y a t M e s q u i t e A v e n u e T r a f f i c S i g n a l U p g r a d e
T r a f f i c S i g n a l M o d i f i c a t i o n
$ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0
$ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 .
6 .
T r a f f i c S i g n a l I n t e r c o n n e c t C o m m u n i c a t i o n U p g r a d e
T r a f f i c S i g n a l . M o d i f i c a t i o n
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0 �
7 .
T r a f f i c S t r i p i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s ( C i t y w i d e )
T r a f f i c S t r i p i n g
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0
: T r a f f i c S i g n a l S t r e e t N a m e S i g n R e p l a c e m e n t P r o g r a m
. ;
T r a f f i c S i g n a l M o d i f i c a t i o n
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0
9 .
C a m i n o R e a l S t r e e t I m p r o v e m e n t s
S t r e e t I m p r o v e m e n t s
$ 6 0 , 0 0 0
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0
1 0 .
A D A C u r b R a m p R e t r o f i t / R e p a i r P r o g r a m
S t r e e t I m p r o v e m e n t s
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0
1 1 .
T r a f f i c S a f e t y P r o j e c t s
T r a f f i c S i g n a l M o d i f i c a t i o n
$ 4 0 , 0 0 0
$ 4 0 , 0 0 0
1 2 .
S B 8 2 1 S i d e w a l k P r o j e c t , ( F Y 0 7 / 0 8 ) y
S i d e w a l k ; C o n s t r u c t i o n
$ 7 0 , 0 0 0
$ 3 0 , 0 0 0
P a g e 1 o f _ 2 .
wercud leufis hum (spuni „b„ &inseam' LOOZ/900Z panunuoo way Jimaraea) 000*Ll$ PPd =t uopted d.
'900Z/L00Z aoj seupdS ailed jo ay; ao papafoad wewesingslp.
lenuue 000'686' 1-$ eui Wawalddns 02 pasn aq IllM (LOOZ AeN 3Q se) 9L0'E5£$ lunowe ay) ul spunl y aanseew 1eoo-1 Bululewaa pewooneull :810
ZZl`;lfi`Z$
ZZL`fil►li$
800Z/LOOZ ae8A 1posId ' ICisi.
-•
DODt+L $
000111$
uo;emPoW. Ieu$!S o�etl
uopeomPo W !euSr oN1 Peo �o.le deM esmunS
'ZL
00E`5$
00E`9$
_ uoRe0WPoW leufiowl'
Pn�S uoezuoa oustS ieueis o�e.a a .nru(mo
11.
ZZt7101•$
ZZt7`01.$
swawanoudwl }same
eN (OVA0) luawasanqu Aenoped:AelleA PIW
• '01.
000`91$
_
uogelelsul leu6lS °Weil
- _
(Apou6pea) Ieufiu.ea 1
ueplsaped looyoS OH sfiupds wled le peo�l 0141e8
a000`911
saNnd aid.
3dn e3w
isoo
1► .101
-
.cliU 103r0lld
sllwrinvuvN LO3r0Nd
'ON
01911
800Z/LOOZ JeaA leosld
e amsee .yea aea easy
uue��o.�d speO�l +g �aaa�S pool �sb'�� 1N A-9 `Z 40Z-$OQZ A 1
AGENDA ITEM 8
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
S e p t e m b e r 2 4 , 2 0 0 7
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
M i c h e l e C i s n e r o s , A c c o u n t i n g a n d H u m a n R e s o u r c e s M a n a g e r
T H R O U G H :
T h e r e s i a T r e v i n o , C h i e f F i n a n c i a l O f f i c e r
S U B J E C T :
A g r e e m e n t s f o r I n t e r n a l A u d i t S e r v i c e s
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
1 ) A p p r o v e t h e s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s a n d a w a r d A g r e e m e n t
N o . 0 8 - 1 9 - 0 2 8 - 0 0 t o K P M G L L ' P t o p e r f o r m i n t e r n a l a u d i t s e r v i c e s a n d
o n - c a l l i n t e r n a l a u d i t s e r v i c e s ( a t t h i s t i m e , t h e c o n t r a c t i s s t i l l i n
n e g o t i a t i o n s a n d s t a f f e x p e c t s t o b r i n g a f i n a l c o n t r a c t t o t h e
C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g ) ;
2 ) A w a r d A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 8 - 1 9 = 0 2 9 - 0 0 t o T h o m p s o n , C o b b , B a z i l i o &
A s s o c i a t e s , P . C . a n d A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 8 - 1 9 - 0 3 0 - 0 0 t o M a y e r H o f f m a n
M c C a n n P . C . t o p e r f o r m o n - c a l l i n t e r n a l a u d i t s e r v i c e s ( a t t h i s t i r n e ,
t h e c o n t r a c t i s s t i l l i n n e g o t i a t i o n s a n d s t a f f e x p e c t s t o b r i n g a f i n a l
c o n t r a c t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g ) ;
3 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e
a g r e e m e n t s o n b e h a l f ; o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d
4 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
T h e F Y ' 2 0 0 7 / 0 8 b u d g e t f o r t h e ' F i n a n c e D e p a r t m e n t i n c l u d e s t h e g o a l t o d e v e l o p
a n d m a i n t a i n a n o r g a n i z a t i o n a c c o u n t a b i l i t y p r o g r a m e n c o m p a s s i n g f i n a n c i a l a n d
o p e r a t i o n a l f u n c t i o n s . O n e o f t h e i n i t i a t i v e s r e l a t e d t o t h i s g o a l i s t h e
i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f a n i n t e r n a l a u d i t p r o g r a m .
T h e i n i t i a l f o c u s o f t h e i n t e r n a l a u d i t p r o g r a m i s a b u s i n e s s r i s k a n a l y s i s a n d
a s s e s s m e n t t h a t w i l l r e s u l t i n t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f a n a u d i t p l a n . A l l d e p a r t m e n t s
a n d o p e r a t i o n s w i l l b e e v a l u a t e d d u r i n g t h e r i s k a s s e s s m e n t p h a s e . A r e a s a s s e s s e d
a s h i g h o r m e d i u m r i s k - a r e p r o j e c t s t h a t a r e l i k e l y t o b e c o n s i d e r e d i n . t h e
d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e . a u d i t p l a n C o m m i s s i o n m a n a g e m e n t a n d t h e A u d i t A d H o c
C o m m i t t e e w i l l h a v e s i g n i f i c a n t i r i v o l v e m e n t i n t h e r e v i e w o f t h e r i s k a s s e s s m e n t ,
d e v e l o p m e n t , a n d f i n a l a p p r o v a l o f a n a u d i t - p l a n w i t h t h e i n t e r n a l a u d i t o r .
A g e n d a I t e m 8
1 5
In addition to the core internal audit activity related to financial and operational
audits, other projects that may be required periodically include construction and
engineering audits, investigative reviews, contract closeouts, special reviews, .and
administrative assistance.
Based on the, depth of resources that would be required for .such an internal audit
program, staff released a request for proposal (RFP) for internal audit services on
July 12, 2007. The Calendar of Events was as follows:
Distribution of RFP
Pre -Proposal Conference
Proposals were Delivered to Commission Prior to 2 p.
Evaluation Committee Review of Proposals
Interviews Held for Short -Listed Firms
Selection Process
July :12, 2007
August 1, 2007
August 27, 2007
September 6 2007 .
September 17, 2007
Staff received seven proposals by the required date and time. An evaluation panel
consisting of Commission finance and program staff as well as a Metro'link finance
representative reviewed the proposals based on qualifications of the firm staffing
and project organization, work plan, cost and price, and completeness of response.
After the review of the proposals, the evaluation panel determined that four firms
submitted high quality proposals and invited those firms for interviews on
September 17, 2007.
During the interviews, the evaluation panel carefully ,considered the personnel .of
the proposed project: team, understanding of the services ° required by the.
Commission and demonstrated capacity to complete the proposed scope of work.
As it relates to the primary focus of the internal audit program for a risk
assessment andaudit plan,the panel ranked the four interviewed' firmsas follows:
Top Ranked
KPMG LLP
Second
Deloitte
Third'
Thompson, Cobb, Bazilio & Associates, P.C.
Fourth
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
Accordingly, :staff recommends the award of Agreement No. 08-1.9-028-00 to
KPMG LLP for internal audit services.
Since staff anticipates an increased need for other internal audit services related to
construction and engineering awards and contract close-outs as well as other
Agenda Item 8
16
"
r e v i e w s a n d a s s i s t a n c e , t h e p a n e l r a n k e d t h e f o u r f i r m s f o r o n - c a l l i n t e r n a l a u d i t
s e r v i c e s a s f o l l o w s :
T o p R a n k e d
T h o m p s o n , C o b b , B a z i l i o & A s s o c i a t e s , P . C .
S e c o n d
M a y e r H o f f m a n M c C a n n P . C .
T h i r d
K P M G L L P
F o u r t h
D e l o i t t e
S t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h a t o n - c a l l i n t e r n a l a u d i t s e r v i c e s b e a w a r d e d t o t h e t h r e e t o p
r a n k e d f i r m s . T h e r e f o r e , s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h e a w a r d o f A g r e e m e n t
N o . 0 8 - 1 9 - 0 2 9 - 0 0 t o T h o m p s o n , C o b b , B a z i l i o & A s s o c i a t e s , P . C . ; A g r e e m e n t
N o . 0 8 - 1 9 - 0 3 0 - 0 0 t o M a y e r H o f f m a n M c C a n n P . C . ; a n d t h e a w a r d o f A g r e e m e n t
N o . 0 8 - 1 9 - 0 2 8 - 0 0 , i n c l u d i n g t h e i n t e r n a l a u d i t s e r v i c e s d i s c u s s e d p r e v i o u s l y , t o
K P M G L L P . A s o n - c a l l i n t e r n a l a u d i t s e r v i c e s a r e r e q u i r e d , a p r o p o s e d s c o p e o f
w o r k w i l l b e p r e s e n t e d t o e a c h f i r m f o r a c o s t a n d w o r k p l a n p r o p o s a l . T h e m o s t
r e s p o n s i v e f i r m w i l l b e a w a r d e d a t a s k o r d e r .
T h e s e t h r e e a g r e e m e n t s a r e a n t i c i p a t e d t o b e t h r e e - y e a r c o n t r a c t s w i t h t w o
o n e - y e a r o p t i o n s . A t t h i s t i m e , s t a f f i s n e g o t i a t i n g t h e t e r m s a n d c o s t w i t h t h e
f i r m s a n d e x p e c t s t o b r i n g f i n a l c o n t r a c t s t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g .
T h e F Y 2 0 0 7 / 0 8 b u d g e t i n c l u d e s e x p e n d i t u r e s o f $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 f o r i n t e r n a l a u d i t
s e r v i c e s . D u e t o t h e a n t i c i p a t e d i n c r e a s e i n p r o j e c t r e l a t e d c o n t r a c t s , s t a f f
r e c o m m e n d s a n i n c r e a s e i n b u d g e t e d e x p e n d i t u r e s o f $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 f o r c o n t r a c t a n d
o t h e r a u d i t s .
F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n
Y e s
F Y 2 0 0 7 / 0 8
$ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0
I n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t :
N o
Y e a r :
F Y 2 0 0 7 / 0 8
A m o u n t :
$ 5 0 , 0 0 0
N / A
F Y 2 0 0 8 / 0 9 +
T B D
S o u r c e o f F u n d s :
M e a s u r e A , L o c a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
F u n d s , M o t o r i s t S e r v i c e s F u n d s
B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t :
N o
Y e s
N / A
G L A N o . :
S 1 9 6 5 4 0 1 P 1 0 0 1
F i s c a l P r o c e d u r e s A p p r o v e d :
\ . i `
D a t e :
0 9 / 1 8 / 2 0 0 7
A g e n d a I t e m 8
1 7
AGENDA ITEM 9
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
September 24, 2007
TO:
Budget and Implementation Committee
FROM:
Shirley Medina, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
2009 Measure A $300 Million Western Riverside County Regional
Arterial Call for Projects
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to
1) Direct staff to release a Call for Projects for 2009 Measure A Western
Riverside County (Western County) Regional Arterial funds in the
amount of $300 million; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The 2009 Measure A identified $300 million over the life of the measure to fund
regional arterial projects in Western County. The intent of this program is to fund
capacity enhancements that are identified on the Transportation Uniform Mitigation
Fee (TUMF) backbone network including roadways specifically listed in the
ordinance and included in the call for projects (Attachment 1). The 2009 Measure
A Western County Regional Arterial funds are also intended to complement TUMF
backbone funded projects where additional TUMF funding above the eligibility
amount may be needed. Measure A Regional Arterial funds are not meant to
replace committed TUMF or local funding.
The 2009 Measure A call for projects was developed by staff and a subcommittee
of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The subcommittee reviewed prior
calls for projects as a basis to develop the Western County Regional Arterial call for
projects. The schedule for the call for projects is as follows:
TAC Approval
Commission Approval
Release of Call for Projects
Deadline for Project Applications
Convene TAC for Project Evaluations
Commission Approval of. Selected Projects for Funding
Agenda Item 9
18
September 17, 2007
October 10, 2007
October 17, 2007
December 15, 2007
January, 2008
February, 2008
Agencies will be allowed to . submit three projects each. The countyof Riverside
will be allowed to :submit three projects per supervisorial district. The target date
for implementation of the approved projects is by 2015.
While the funding source for the selected projects is 2009 Measure, A Western
County Regional Arterial funds, it may be necessary to issue debt to 'finance these
projects. Some projects may commence prior to the July 1, 2009 effective date of
the 2009 Measure A; therefore, an increase in the commercial paper program
amount may be necessary to advance projects that are ready before the 2009
Measure A begins. Additionally, the Call for Projects is based on the $300 million
of revenues expected to be generated over the 30-year term of the 2009 Measure
A; however, the implementation date for the selected projects is by 2015.
Accordingly, it may be necessary to issue long-term debt to finance the costs of
these projects that will be completed during the first 10-year period of the
2009 Measure A. Finally, the financing of all or part of the $300 million may have
a significant impact on the $ 500 million debt limitation for the 2009 Measure A.
The intent of this call for projects is to program the entire $300 million
2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial funds and implement the
approved` projects within the first 10 years of the 2009 Measure A. The fiscal
impact of the call for projects on the 2009 Measure. A Western County Regional
Arterial program is uncertain, and the estimated cost of the approved projects
cannot be determined until all project submittals are evaluated.
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget:
N/A
Year:
FY 2009-2015
Amount:
$300,000,000
Source of Funds:
2009 Measure A Regional Arterial
Budget Adjustment:
N/A
GLA No.:
266 72 81 XXX
Fiscal Procedures Approved:
,14"wn
Date:
09/19/2007
Attachment: Draft; 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterials
$300 Million Call for Projects
Agenda Item 9
19
"
- D R A F T -
2 0 0 9 : M E A S U R E A
V V E S T E R N C O U N T Y R E G I O N A L A R T E R I A L S
$ 3 0 0 M I L L I O N C A L L F O R P R O J E C T S
T h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A i n c l u d e d a c a t e g o r y o f f u n d i n g f o r t h e R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l
S y s t e m . T h e R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l S y s t e m c o m p o n e n t i s d e s c r i b e d i n O r d i n a n c e
0 2 - 0 0 1 a s f o l l o w s :
" T h e f r e e w a y a n d s t a t e h i g h w a y s y s t e m c a n n o l o n g e r b e e x p e c t e d t o h a n d l e t h e
t r a f f i c d e m a n d s f o r t r a v e l b e t w e e n a n d t h r o u g h t h e c i t i e s o f t h e W e s t e r n C o u n t y .
a r e a , w i t h t h e d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t e d f o r t h e f u t u r e . A s y s t e m o f r e g i o n a l
a r t e r i a l s ( m a j o r l o c a l r o a d w a y s ) w i t h l i m i t e d a c c e s s , f r e e w a y i n t e r c h a n g e s , g r a d e
s e p a r a t i o n s , a n d c o o r d i n a t e d t r a f f i c s i g n a l s a r e n e e d e d t o s u p p l e m e n t t h e
h i g h w a y b a c k b o n e s y s t e m . T h e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n c i l o f G o v e r n m e n t s
( W R C O G ) , i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e c i t i e s a n d t h e C o u n t y ; h a s d e v e l o p e d t h i s
s y s t e m o f r o a d w a y s t o m e e t t h i s n e e d . T h i s r o a d w a y s y s t e m w i l l b e p e r i o d i c a l l y
u p d a t e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n , o r t h e W R C O G , t o r e f l e c t a c t u a l d e v e l o p m e n t
t r e n d s .
F u n d i n g t o w i d e n e x i s t i n g r o a d s a n d c o n s t r u c t n e w r o a d s o n t h i s s y s t e m w i l l b e
f u n d e d b y a n e s t i m a t e d $ 3 0 0 m i l l i o n i n r e v e n u e s g e n e r a t e d b y M e a s u r e A a n d b y
m a t c h i n g r e v e n u e s t o b e g e n e r a t e d b y t h e c i t i e s a n d C o u n t y i m p l e m e n t i n g a
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e ( T U M F ) a d m i n i s t e r e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n
o r t h e W R C O G .
E x a m p l e s o f t h e r o a d w a y s o n t h e r e g i o n a l a r t e r i a l s y s t e m t h a t m a y b e e l i g i b l e t o
r e c e i v e M e a s u r e A a n d T U M F f u n d i n g f o r w i d e n i n g a n d o t h e r i m p r o v e m e n t s t o
i n c r e a s e c a p a c i t y a n d t r a f f i c f l o w a r e :
" V a n B u r e n B l v d f r o m 1 - 2 1 5 t o S R - 6 0
" A l e s s a n d r o B l v d f r o m ' I - 2 1 5 w e s t e r l y t o C e n t r a l A v e
" C e n t r a l A v e f r o m A l e s s a n d r o B l v d t o V a n B u r e n B l v d
" A r l i n g t o n A v e f r o m C e n t r a l A v e t o V a n B u r e n B l v d
" G r e e n R i v e r R d f r o m D o m i n g u e z R a n c h R d t o S R - 9 1
" F o o t h i l l P a r k w a y f r o m L i n c o l n A v e t o G r e e n R i v e r R d
" S c o t t R d f r o m S R - 7 9 t o I - 2 1 5
" C l i n t o n K e i t h R d f r o m S R - 7 9 t o 1 - 2 1 5
" D a t e S t r e e t f r o m S R - 7 9 t o t - 1 5
" S R - 7 9 / 1 - 1 0 I n t e r c h a n g e I m p r o v e m e n t s a n d p o s s i b l e b y p a s s t o 1 - 1 0
" R a m s e y S t f r o m B a n n i n g C i t y L i m i t s t o F i e l d R d
" R a m o n a E x p r e s s w a y f r o m S a n J a c i n t o t o 1 - 2 1 5
" C a j a l c o R d f r o m 1 - 2 1 5 t o t - 1 5
" P e r r i s B l v d f r o m S R - 7 4 t o S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o L i n e
" P y r i t e . S t r e e t f r o m S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y L i n e t o S R - 6 0 _
2 0
- DRAFT -
Schleisman Rd from San Bernardino County tine to 1-15 and Arlington
Avenue
Domenigoni Pkwy from State St to 1-215
Railroad Canyon/Newport Road from 1-215 to I-15
The final scope and project limits of all improvements proposed for the regional
arterial system will be determined through noticed public hearings, environmental
clearance process, and agreement with affected agencies."
Project Eligibility ,and Basic Assumptions:
Projects listed in the Measure A ballot and/or included in the "backbone".
TUMF network are eligible for this Call for Projects.
Measure A Regional Arterial funding should not replace already committed
TUMF or Local funds. A local fund commitment is represented as funds.
appropriated in the agency's annual budget that is adopted by the
council/board.
It is the 'intention of the Regional Arterial program to match the Measure
funds on a dollar for dollar (50%) basis. However, projects will still be
eligible if the match is lesser than 50%. More points will be given to
projects with higher match rates.
• Agencies may submit up to three (3) project applications. The County of
Riverside may submit up to three (3) project applications per supervisorial
district.
The target construction date for projects that are approved under this call
for projects is 2015. Projects must demonstrate that they can begin
construction by 2015.
RCTC will monitorproject progress and will rescind fund allocations if
reasonable progress is not being made.
Measure ,A Regional Arterial funds will be made available for ALL project
phases (PA&ED, PS&E, R/W, and Construction).:
• RCTC staff will review project schedules to determine if they are
reasonably feasible. Adjustments to schedules may be made by RCTC`
staff for programming purposes where appropriate.
The Scope of Work under this call for projects is for capacity
enhancements. Rehabilitation and maintenance work/costs. are not
eligible for Measure A Regional Arterial funds. 'Work activities that are
part of and within the limits of a capacity enhancement project (e.g.
21
"
- D R A F T
r e h a b i l i t a t i o n / o v e r l a y s , c u r b g u t t e r , s i d e w a l k , e t c . ) a r e e l i g i b l e p r o j e c t
c o s t s . L a n d s c a p i n g , i r r i g a t i o n , a n d o t h e r " s o f t s c a p e " a c t i v i t i e s a r e n o t
e l i g i b l e .
" P r o j e c t s f u n d e d b y t h e M e a s u r e A R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l p r o g r a m w i l l c o n t i n u e
t o b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e T U M F c a l c u l a t i o n t o e n s u r e t h a t M e a s u r e f u n d i n g
d o e s n o t r e p l a c e T U M F f u n d i n g .
E V A L U A T I O N C R I T E R I A
T h e f o l l o w i n g c r i t e r i a w i l l b e u s e d t o e v a l u a t e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n s :
I . E m p h a s i s o n M e a s u r e A P r o g r a m
P r o j e c t s l i s t e d o n t h e M e a s u r e A B a l l o t a n d / o r i n c l u d e d i n t h e b a c k b o n e
T U M F n e t w o r k t h a t a r e n o t e x p e c t e d t o b e f u n d e d f r o m a n t i c i p a t e d
r e v e n u e s :
S c o r i n g : 0 t o 3 p o i n t s , 0 i f n o t a p p l i c a b l e
I n d i c a t o r s
P o i n t s
I f p r o j e c t i s o n M e a s u r e A B a l l o t A N D T U M F
3
B a c k b o n e
I f p r o j e c t i s o n M e a s u r e A B a l l o t o n l y
2
I f p r o j e c t i s o n T U M F : B a c k b o n e o n l y
1
T o t a l n u m b e r o f p o i n t s g i v e n w i l l n o t e x c e e d 3 .
I I . R e g i o n a l S i g n i f i c a n c e
P r o j e c t s t h a t a r e r e g i o n a l , m u l t i j u r i s d i c t i o n a l , i d e n t i f i e d o n t h e C o n g e s t i o n
M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S y s t e m , C E T A P n e t w o r k i n W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e
C o u n t y , o r W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T U M F B a c k b o n e n e t w o r k .
P r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t s a r e r e q u i r e d t o s u b m i t 2 0 3 0 A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c ( A D T )
u s i n g a t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m p u t e r m o d e l c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e S o u t h e r n
C a l i f o r n i a A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s ' ( S C A G ) r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n
m o d e l . P r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t s s h o u l d o b t a i n 2 0 3 0 A D T n u m b e r s f r o m
W R C O G .
P r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t s h a v e t h e o p t i o n t o p r o v i d e s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n i f
t h e m o d e l r e s u l t s s h o w 2 0 3 0 A D T t o b e u n r e a l i s t i c ( e . g . m o d e l r e s u l t s f o r
t h e y e a r 2 0 3 0 a r e a t o r n e a r c u r r e n t t r a f f i c c o n d i t i o n s ) . T h e E v a l u a t i o n
C o m m i t t e e w i l l c o n s i d e r t h e s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r r n a t i o n ; h o w e v e r , i t i s n o t
g u a r a n t e e d t h a t t h e i n f o r m a t i o n w i l l b e u s e d t o s u b s t i t u t e m o d e l
i n f o r m a t i o n .
2 2
- DRAFT -
Scoring: 0 to 3 points, 0 if not applicable
The Scoring delineation for ADT in the year 2030 is as follows:
2030 ADT
Points
50,000 and above
3
30,000 — 49,999
2
10,000 — 29,999
1
9,999 - and below
0
If an agency wishes to provide supplemental inforrnation.regarding ADT,
they may do so in the space below.
Supplemental information regarding ADT:
ILI. Project Readiness
Project applicants will provide project implementation status. Projects
closest to construction will be given the highest level of points. Points will
be given based on documentation of completed phases or workin
progress.
Scoring: 0 to 3 points, 0 if not applicable
The Scoring delineation is as follows:
Level of Project Readiness
Points
Ready for construction, r/w
certified
3
Completed Design
2
Completed Environmental
1
Preliminary Work
0
Describe the project irnplementation status and provide documentation of
completed work or work in progress:
23
"
- D R A F T -
I V . S a f e t y
P r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t s m u s t d e s c r i b e h o w t h e p r o j e c t w i l l i m p r o v e s a f e t y .
S c o r i n g : O t o 3 p o i n t s , 0 i f p r o j e c t w i l l n o t r e s u l t i n s a f e t y
i m p r o v e m e n t
P r o j e c t s w i l l b e s c o r e d o n a 0 3 p o i n t r a n g e b a s e d u p o n t h e q u a l i t a t i v e
i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t d e s c r i b e s h o w t h e p r o j e c t w i l l e l i m i n a t e o r s i g n i f i c a n t l y
r e d u c e a n e x i s t i n g o r f u t u r e s a f e t y p r o b l e m . T h e E v a l u a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
w i l l d e t e r m i n e w h a t c o n s t i t u t e s h i g h , m e d i u m , a n d l o w s a f e t y b e n e f i t s a t
t h e t i m e o f p r o j e c t e v a l u a t i o n s .
P r o v i d e a q u a l i t a t i v e d e s c r i p t i o n o n h o w t h e p r o j e c t w i l l i m p r o v e s a f e t y :
V . C o n g e s t i o n M i t i g a t i o n
P r o j e c t A p p l i c a n t s m u s t p r o v i d e d e t a i l e d i n f o r m a t i o n o n ' h o w t h e p r o j e c t
w i l l i m p r o v e c o n g e s t i o n :
T h e P r o j e c t w i l l p r o v i d e C o n g e s t i o n ' M i t i g a t i o n a s f o l l o w s :
C o n g e s t i o n M i t i g a t i o n w i l l b e m e a s u r e d b y L e v e l o f S e r v i c e . P r o j e c t
a p p l i c a n t s a r e r e q u i r e d t o s u b m i t 2 0 3 0 L O S f r o m t h e W R C O G T U M F
m o d e l n e t w o r k .
2 4
- DRAFT -
LOS for project:
Project applicants have the option to provide supplemental information if
model results show 2030 LOS does not accurately depict the overall
congestion benefit that the project will yield. The Evaluation Committee
will consider the supplemental information; however, it is not guaranteed
that the information will be used to substitute model information.
Supplemental information regarding LOS/Congestion benefit:
Scoring: 0 to 3 points
3 points = High Congestion Benefit
2 points = Medium Congestion Benefit
1 point = Low Congestion Benefit
4 point = No Congestion Benefit
The TAC Evaluation Committee will determine 'high, medium, and low
congestion benefits at the time of project evaluations.
VI.: Matching Funds
Projects need to maximize TU'MF eligibility costs. Projects that include
local match funds will be given points based on the percentage of local
funds committed to the totalprojectcost. Local match funds must be
committed by the local agency through a resolution or council/board
action. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program funds that
will be designated as local match must be committed through a WRCOG
or RCTC board action.
Scoring 0 to 5 -points,
Percent
Points..
75%° and above
5
60% - 74%
4
50% - 59°1°
,3
30% - 49% match
2`
25
"
- D R A F T -
1 0 % - 2 9 % m a t c h
1
9 % o r l e s s
0
V I I . S y s t e m C o n t i n u i t y
P r o j e c t s t h a t w i l l - c o m p l e t e t h e c o n t i n u i t y o f a n e x i s t i n g r o a d s y s t e m .
E x a m p l e s o f p r o j e c t s u n d e r S y s t e m C o n t i n u i t y i n c l u d e :
1 . E l i m i n a t i o n o f b o t t l e - n e c k s ( l a n e w i d e n i n g a n d i n t e r c h a n g e
i m p r o v e m e n t s ) ;
2 . G a p c l o s u r e s ( n e w c o n n e c t i o n s ) ; a n d
3 . E l i m i n a t i o n o f o b s t r u c t i o n ( g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n , b r i d g e o v e r
r o a d w a y , r i v e r , s t o r m d r a i n c h a n n e l , e t c . ) .
S c o r i n g : 0 3 p o i n t s . 0 i f n o t a p p l i c a b l e
I n d i c a t o r
P o i n t s
M u l t i - j u r i s d i c t i o n a l ( p r o j e c t l o c a t e d i n m o r e t h a n o n e
j u r i s d i c t i o n , a n d f r e e w a y i n t e r c h a n g e s )
3
G a p C l o s u r e
2
F u l l e l i m i n a t i o n o f o b s t r u c t i o n / b o t t l e n e c k
2
P a r t i a l e l i m i n a t i o n o f o b s t r u c t i o n
1
I f t h e p r o j e c t m e e t s m o r e t h a n o n e o f t h e a b o v e i n d i c a t o r s , t h e p o i n t s w i l l
b e s u m m e d . T o t a l n u m b e r o f p o i n t s g i v e n w i l l n o t e x c e e d 3 .
P r o j e c t A p p l i c a n t s m u s t c o m p l e t e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n b e l o w :
D e s c r i b e h o w t h e p r o j e c t m e e t s t h e S y s t e m C o n t i n u i t y c r i t e r i o n :
D e s c r i b e w h i c h o f t h e a b o v e i n d i c a t o r ( s ) t h i s p r o j e c t m e e t s :
- DRAFT -
Other related System Continuity Benefits:
Number of Existing Lanes:
Number of Lanes after the improvement:
27
AGENDA ITEM 10
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M / S S / O N
D A T E :
S e p t e m b e r 2 4 , 2 0 0 7
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e
S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r
T H R O U G H :
A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
C i t y o f P a l m S p r i n g s R e q u e s t f o r A d d i t i o n a l F e d e r a l F u n d s o n G e n e
A u t r y T r a i l W i d e n i n g P r o j e c t
T E C H N I C A L A D V I S O R Y C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
1 ) A p p r o v e t h e T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e ( T A C ) a n d s t a f f
r e c o m m e n d a t i o n t o i n c r e a s e f e d e r a l S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m
( S T P ) f u n d s o n t h e G e n e A u t r y T r a i l w i d e n i n g p r o j e c t f r o m
$ 1 . 5 4 m i l l i o n t o $ 4 , 0 3 8 , 0 2 0 ; a n d
2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
T h e a t t a c h e d l e t t e r f r o m t h e c i t y o f P a l m S p r i n g s ( C i t y ) , d a t e d S e p t e m b e r 4 , 2 0 0 7 ,
i s r e q u e s t i n g a d d i t i o n a l f e d e r a l . S T P f u n d i n g o n t h e G e n e A u t r y T r a i l R a i l r o a d ' B r i d g e
p r o j e c t . T h i s p r o j e c t w a s o r i g i n a l l y a p p r o v e d f o r 2 0 0 2 S t a t e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m d i s c r e t i o n a r y f u n d i n g a n d w a s s u b s e q u e n t l y r e p r o g r a m m e d
w i t h f e d e r a l S T P f u n d i n g d u e t o t h e s t a t e b u d g e t c r i s i s t h a t b e g a n i n 2 0 0 3 .
A s i n d i c a t e d i n t h e C i t y ' s l e t t e r , t h i s p r o j e c t h a s e x p e r i e n c e d e x t e n u a t i n g
c i r c u m s t a n c e s i n d e l i v e r y . T h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t e s t i m a t e w a s d e v e l o p e d i n 2 0 0 0 .
D u e t o i n f l a t i o n c o s t s a n d t h e s p i k e i n c o n s t r u c t i o n m a t e r i a l s o v e r t h e L a s t f e w
y e a r s t h e p r o j e c t c o s t s i n c r e a s e d 7 1 . 3 % , f r o m $ 2 . 2 m i l l i o n t o $ 3 , 7 6 8 , 6 0 0 .
A n o t h e r - i s s u e t h e C i t y e n c o u n t e r e d w a s r e l a t e d t o t h e t i m i n g o f t h e U n i o n ' P a c i f i c
R a i l r o a d ' s a d d i t i o n a l m a i n l i n e t r a c k i m p r o v e m e n t , w h i c h w i l l a l s o r e q u i r e t h e C i t y
t o c o n s t r u c t a r e i n f o r c e d c o n c r e t e w a l l s e c t i o n i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 1 . 5 m i l l i o n .
L a s t l y , t h e P a l m D r i v e / G e n e A u t r y i n t e r c h a n g e p r o j e c t w i l l c o n n e c t t o t h e C i t y ' s
p r o j e c t a n d w i l l r e q u i r e a n e l e v a t e d r o a d p r o f i l e , w h i c h w a s n o t k n o w n a t t h e t i m e
t h e p r o j e c t w a s s u b m i t t e d f o r f u n d i n g . T h e c o s t a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e p r o f i l e i s
$ 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 . T h e C i t y w i l l a l s o b e r e q u i r e d t o d e l a y i t s p r o j e c t u n t i l a f t e r t h e s t a r t o f
c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e i n t e r c h a n g e p r o j e c t . T o t a l c o s t i n c r e a s e s o f $ 3 , 5 6 8 , 6 0 0 r e s u l t
i n a t o t a l p r o j e c t c o s t o f $ 5 , 7 6 8 , 6 0 0 .
A g e n d a I t e m 1 0 .
2 8
The City is requesting an increase of $2,498,020 to the original STP funds of
$ 1.54 million for a total of $4,038,020. The City will maintain the same
federal/local. share (70% federal and 30% local) funding split with the City funding
contribution of $1, 730, 580.
This request was presented and approved at the September 17, 2007 TAC
meeting. Staff recommends support for the increase in STP funds given the
unforeseen extenuating circumstances. Due to project delays, there is capacity to
add STP funding to this project.
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget:
N/A
Year:
N/A
Amount:
$2,498,020
Source of funds:
Surface Transportation Program
Budget Adjustment:
N/A
GLA No.:
N/A
Fiscal Procedures Approved:
- ,11,
Date:
09/18/2007
Attachment: City of Palm Springs Request
Agenda Item 10
29
I. - 2
81628 AM, SM
September 4, 2007
City of Palm. Springs
Department of Public Works and Engineering
3200 E. 1ahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs, California 92262
Tel: (760) 323-8253 • Pax: (760) 322-8360 ` Web: www.ci_palm-springs.ca.us
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Attn: Shirley Medina, Program Manager.
P. Q. Box 12008
Riverside, CA 92502-2208
ECEROVIE
SEP 072007
RIVERSIDE COUMY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Re: Gene Autry Trail Railroad Bridge Project, City Project #01-04
Dear Shirley;
Pursuant to my recent conversation with Anne Mayer and our email correspondence, we are
continuing to proceed with completion of the plans and specifications for the referenced project. The
RT1P number for the project is RIV 010213. This project originally was a STIP Funded project, but
was moved over to.STPL Funding several -years ago when.RCTC did'&number of transfers. The
original discretionary grant funding had a federal amount of $1,540,000 which represented 70% of
the cost estimate. at the time. , Since that time the following has. occurred:
1. Cost increases per the Caltrans Bridge Construction Cost Index, inflation of costs froth 2000
to 2006 equals .71.3%. This represents a cost of $1,568,000 to the original $2.2million
project.
2. The Union Pacific Railroad is moving forward with its additional main line track and are
requiring the piers adjacent to the track be constructed with an entire in -fill wall protection.
This represents an increase of $1.5million to construct the reinforced concrete wall section.
Further; the railroad informs us that they will be going to bid within one month and will not
allow our work_ on this bridge while their contract : is under way. Therefore, barring any
delays in ,the railroad project, it appears we will be forced to wait until the railroad project
has completed their work in the area of Gene Autry Trail. We will then be required, in
addition to the walls mentioned above, to provide additional false work and flagmen at our
projects' expense, for protection from this active third rail line.
3. The Palm Drive/Gene Autry interchange Design is elevating the road profile of Gene Autry
Trail from the Railroad Bridge,to I-10 by several feet. This profile was not known at the time
of application for Federal _ Funding for the Railroad Bridge, .but represents an increase of
about $500,000 for additional roadway approach fill and construction.:
The total increases to the construction costs, represented by the above three items is $3,568,600,
bringing the total estimate to $5,768,600.
Post Office Box 2743 ' Palm Springs, California 92263-2743
30
Shirley Medina, RCTC
GAT Bridge Widening, CP#01-04
Page 2
l am requesting that you place a request for additional STPL Funding on the TAC Agenda, and
should a favorable recommendation come forward from the TAC, on to the Commission Agenda.
This request is an increase in . STPL Funding of $2,498,020 to the current federal amount of
$1,540,000 resulting in a total federal funding amount of $4,038,020 which represents the same 70%
federal share for the new cost estimate.
Please let me know when this can be placed on the TAC Agenda, such that the project milestone
report can be updated to reflect the revised funding and the IMP amended.
Sincerely,
David J. Barakian
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DJB/clr
xc: Anne Mayer
Marcus Fuller
31
AGENDA ITEM 11
•
"
R I V E R S I D E
C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
S e p t e m b e r 2 4 , 2 0 0 7
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
- M a r l i n F e e n s t r a , C a p i t a l P r o g r a m M a n a g e r
M a r k M a s s m a n , B e c h t e l P r o j e c t M a n a g e r
E r i k G a l l o w a y , B e c h t e l P r o j e c t C o o r d i n a t o r
T H R O U G H :
H i d e o S u g i t a , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
A m e n d m e n t t o t h e P r o j e c t S c o p e a n d a P r o j e c t B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t
w i t h L i m a n d N a s c i r m e n t o E n g i n e e r i n g C o r p o r a t i o n t o E x p a n d t h e
S c o p e o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t o f P l a n s , S p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a n d C o s t
E s t i m a t e f o r t h e C o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e I n t e r s t a t e 2 1 5 / S t a t e R o u t e 6 0
E a s t J u n c t i o n B e t w e e n t h e B o x S p r i n g s O v e r c r o s s i n g a n d
D a y S t r e e t U n d e r c r o s s i n g
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : .
1 ) A p p r o v e a n a m e n d m e n t t o t h e p r o j e c t s c o p e ( A t t a c h m e n t 1 ) f o r t h e
= 2 1 5 / S R - 6 0 E a s t J u n c t i o n p r o j e c t a n d i n c r e a s e o f t h e p r o j e c t b u d g e t
( A t t a c h m e n t 2 ) f r o m $ 3 5 . 3 5 m i l l i o n t o $ 5 5 . 7 4 2 m i l l i o n ;
2 ) A p p r o v e A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 7 - 3 1 - 0 3 9 - 0 1 , A m e n d m e n t N o . 1 t o
A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 7 - 3 1 - 0 3 9 - 0 0 , w i t h L i m a n d N a s c i m e n t o E n g i n e e r i n g
C o r p o r a t i o n ( ` L A N ) b a s e d o n t h e n e g o t i a t e d p r o j e c t s c o p e , s c h e d u l e ;
a n d c o s t t h a t i s a t t a c h e d t o t h i s a g e n d a i t e m f o r a b a s e a m o u n t o f
$ 1 , 5 3 3 , 4 5 2 , p l u s 2 3 . 9 % c o n t i n g e n c y a m o u n t o f $ 3 6 6 , 5 4 8 , t o c o v e r
p o t e n t i a l c h a n g e s i n s c o p e f o r a t o t a l n o t t o e x c e e d a m o u n t o f
$ 1 . 9 m i l l i o n [ $ 1 . 6 8 2 m i l l i o n o f f e d e r a l C o n g e s t i o n M i t i g a t i o n a n d A i r
Q u a l i t y ( C M A Q ) p r o g r a m f u n d s a n d $ 2 1 8 , 0 0 0 o f M e a s u r e A a s l o c a l
m a t c h ' I , w h i c h a d d r e s s e s t h e a d d i t i o n a l d e s i g n f e e s r e q u i r e d f o r
e x p a n s i o n o f t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t s c o p e t o i n c o r p o r a t e e l e m e n t s f r o m
t h e C a l t r a n s d e s i g n s e q u e n c i n g p r o j e c t a n d a d d i t i o n a l p o r t i o n s f r o m
t h e S e g m e n t 7 p r o j e c t ; a n d
3 ) ` F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
A g e n d a I t e m 1 1
3 2
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Summary
At its July 12, 2006 meeting, the Commission approved the award of Agreement'
No. 07-31-039-00 to LAN for the development of the PS&E for the construction of
two new high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane structures at the l 215/SR-60 "East:
Junction", between Box Springs overcrossing and Day Street : undercrossing.
This ;project is necessary to close the gap that will exist between. the SR-60 HOV
lanes recently constructed by the Commission in Moreno Valley and the HOV lanes
on the SR-60/1-215 being constructed as part of the Caltrans design sequencing
project on 1-215. This gap was created when, due to budget constraints, elements
of . Segment 7 construction were deleted from the design sequencing project.
In recent months, Caltrans has requested that additional Segment 7 elements`
(defined in Attachment 1) be deferred from the design sequencing project to the
1-215/SR-60 East Junction project. Inclusion of these additionalelements requires
adjustment to both the design and construction budgets as well as the existing`:
design contract with LAN. All of the subject scope of work for this I-21 5/SR-60 ;.
East . Junction project was addressed in the environmental impact
report/environmental impact statement (EIR/EIS) developed for the 1-215 Design
Sequencing project.
1-215 Design Sequencing and, 1-215/SR-60 East Junction Projects
The project report for the SR-60/SR-91 /1-215 (EA 08-466902) design sequencing ;
project, dated April 27, 2001, .was segmented into seven parts. Segment 7 of the
project included two, pairs of HOV connectors at the East Junction; ._o one pair of
connectors was to be_ between the west and east legs of the interchange and the
other pair between the west and south legs. Due to funding : constraints,
Segment 7 could not be constructed at the same time as the other six segments,
which are currently under construction.
Caltrans and the Commission agreed to split the work included in Segment 7 into
two separate projects; the 1-215/SR-60 East Junction HOV connector project and a
subsequent project to deliver the balance of the Segment 7. work. Staff' and
Caltrans reviewedthe remaining. Segment 7 work and determined that .it would be
beneficial to the public and adjacent cities to proceed with the design and
construction of .some portions as part of the I-215/SR-60 East Junction HOV
connector project.
Agenda, Item 11
33
"
T h e d e s i g n s e q u e n c i n g e l e m e n t s a n d p o r t i o n s o f t h e S e g m e n t 7 p r o j e c t p r o p o s e d t o
b e i n c l u d e d w i t h t h e 1 - 2 1 5 / S R - 6 0 E a s t J u n c t i o n p r o j e c t h a v e a l r e a d y b e e n
e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y c l e a r e d a s p a r t o f t h e 1 - 2 1 5 d e s i g n s e q u e n c i n g p r o j e c t .
T h e s e e l e m e n t s a r e l i s t e d i n A t t a c h m e n t 1 a s a d d i t i o n a l p r o j e c t s c o p e .
T h e b e n e f i t s t h a t w i l l r e s u l t b y d e s i g n i n g a n d c o n s t r u c t i n g t h e s e e l e m e n t s a s p a r t
o f t h e . I - 2 1 5 / S R - 6 0 E a s t J u n c t i o n p r o j e c t a r e :
"
"
"
"
I m p r o v e d t r a f f i c f l o w o n t h e w e s t b o u n d S R - 6 0 ;
T r a f f i c c o n g e s t i o n w i l l b e a d d r e s s e d o n B o x S p r i n g s R o a d ;
A r e d u c t i o n o f " t h r o w a w a y " i t e m s o f w o r k , ( e . g . p a v e m e n t , g u a r d r a i l ,
r a m p r e a l i g n m e n t , e t c . ) i f t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t s c o p e w a s c o n s t r u c t e d ;
R e d u c t i o n i n t h e a m o u n t o f t i m e t h e w e s t b o u n d . B o x S p r i n g s o f f r a m p
i s c l o s e d f o r r e a l i g n m e n t ; a n d
N o r t h b o u n d ( w e s t b o u n d 6 0 ) B o x S p r i n g s r a m p w i l l b e c o n s t r u c t e d i n
i t s u l t i m a t e l o c a t i o n .
I f t h e s e : p o r t i o n s . o f t h e S e g m e n t 7 p r o j e c t a r e n o t d e s i g n e d a n d c o n s t r u c t e d a s p a r t
o f t h e 1 - 2 1 5 / S R = 6 0 E a s t J u n c t i o n p r o j e c t , a f u t u r e e n v i r o n m e n t a l r e - e v a l u a t i o n m a y
b e r e q u i r e d A p o t e n t i a l r e - e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l d o c u m e n t w o u l d d e l a y
t h e i m p r o v e r n e n t s , a n d s u c h a d e l a y c o u l d h a v e a n i m p a c t o n c o s t .
n o r d e r t o i m p l e m e n t t h i s p r o j e c t i n t h e m i n i m u m a m o u n t o f t i m e , t h e C o m m i s s i o n
h a s r e q u e s t e d t h a t C a ! t r a n s a n d F e d e r a l H i g h w a y A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F H W A ) d e l e g a t e
t h e a u t h o r i t y t o a l l o w t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o a d v e r t i s e , a w a r d , a n d a d m i n i s t e r t h e
c o n s t r u c t i o n p a c k a g e .
F u n d i n g / B u d g e t B a c k g r o u n d
A t i t s J u n e 5 , 2 0 0 5 m e e t i n g , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d p r o g r a m m i n g o f
$ 2 . 5 m i l l i o n i n f u n d i n g ( $ 2 , 2 1 3 , 2 5 0 o f f e d e r a l C M A Q p r o g r a m f u n d s a n d
$ 2 8 6 , 7 5 0 o f M e a s u r e A f u n d s ) . f o r t h e d e s i g n o f t h e I - 2 1 5 / S R - 6 0 f a s t J u n c t i o n
p r o j e c t . I n a d d i t i o n , a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 2 8 . 8 m i l l i o n i n S t a t e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( S T I P ) f u n d i n g w a s c o m m i t t e d f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n s i s t i n g o f
$ 2 0 . 7 3 3 m i l l i o n i n S T I P I n t e r r e g i o n a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( I I P ) f u n d s a n d
$ 8 . 1 1 7 m i l l i o n i n S T I P R e g i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( R I P ) . . A t i t s
S e p t e m b e r 1 2 , 2 0 0 7 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g , a n a d d i t i o n a l $ 4 m i l l i o n w a s a p p r o v e d
f o r t h e r i g h t - o f - w a y p h a s e f o r a t o t a l p r o j e c t b u d g e t o f $ 3 5 . 3 5 m i l l i o n .
A n a m e n d m e n t : t o t h e p r o j e c t b u d g e t a n d c o n s u l t a n t c o n t r a c t i s n e c e s s a r y t o
i n c o r p o r a t e t h e a d d i t i o n a l d e s i g n s e q u e n c i n g S e g m e n t 7 e l e m e n t s a n d a s s o c i a t e d
r i g h t - o f - w a y , e n g i n e e r i n g , w h i c h w e r e n o t i d e n t i f i e d a n d i n c l u d e d i n t h e o r i g i n a l
A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 7 = 3 1 - 0 3 9 - 0 0 . T h e a d d i t i o n a l s c o p e i s d e t a i l e d i n A t t a c h m e n t 1 .
A g e n d a I t e m 1 . 1 -
3 4
The revised project estimate is $55.742 million, which reflects an estimated project
cost increase of '$20.392 million due to this additional scope. The revised budget
is detailed in Attachment 2.
Funding for the 1-215/SR-60 East Junction project is proposed as follows;:
PS&E Design
CMAQ
1989 Measure A (match)
$3,895,320
504,680
Total $4,400,000
Reflects proposed PS&E increase of $1.9 million (total from $2.5
$4.4 million)
Right -of -Way
*CMAQ
1989 Measure A (match)
$3,541,2`00
458,800
Total $4000,000
*The right-of-way phase was approved at September. 12, 2007 Commission
meeting. The amount of funds approved for CMAQ was $4 million.
This agenda item corrects the CMAQ funds for the right-of-way phase to
$3,541,200. The Measure A funds of $458,800 were approved correctly.
Construction/Construction Support
STIP-IIP $20,733,000
STP-R1P 8,117,000
**Federal STP and/or CMAQ CMAQ 18,492,000
Total $47,342,000
**Staff is proposing to fund the uncommitted constructionarnount with
federal funding sources such as Surface Transportation Program (STP) and/or
CMAQ, whichever funding source is available. Construction estimates are
currently being refined and will be brought back to the Commission at a later
date.
At its January 11, 2006 meeting, the Commission approved the :programming for :
the 2006.STIP and reaffirmed its commitment to maintain funding for the 1-215/SR
60 East Junction project. Therefore, staff recommends that the Budget and
Implementation Committee approve the additional scope for the project, the revised
Agenda Item 1 1
35
"
"
"
p r o j e c t b u d g e t o f $ 5 5 . 7 4 2 m i l l i o n , a n d A m e n d m e n t N o . 1 w i t h L A N f o r t h e
i n c o r p o r a t i o n o f t h e a d d i t i o n a l p r o j e c t s c o p e a s d e t a i l e d i n A t t a c h m e n t 1 . L A N h a s
d e v e l o p e d a r e v i s e d s c o p e , s c h e d u l e , a n d c o s t s u m m a r y f o r t h e I - 2 1 5 / S R - 6 0 E a s t
J u n c t i o n p r o j e c t , w h i c h i s i n c l u d e d i n A t t a c h m e n t 3 . T h e t o t a l p r o j e c t c o s t f o r t h e
p r o p o s e d s c o p e o f w o r k f o r A m e n d m e n t N o . 1 i s $ 1 . 9 m i l l i o n . T h i s w i l l b r i n g t h e
t o t a l p r o j e c t n o t t o e x c e e d c o n t r a c t v a l u e ( i n c l u d i n g t h e o r i g i n a l a g r e e m e n t f o r
$ 2 . 5 m i l l i o n a n d A m e n d m e n t N o . 1 f o r $ 1 . 9 m i l l i o n ) t o $ 4 . 4 m i l l i o n f o r t h e P S & E
p h a s e . T h e $ 1 . 9 m i l l i o n i s p r o p o s e d t o b e f u n d e d b y $ 1 . 6 8 2 m i l l i o n o f C M A Q
f u n d s a n d $ 2 1 8 , 0 0 0 o f M e a s u r e A a s l o c a l m a t c h .
F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n
I n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t :
N o
Y e a r :
F Y 2 0 0 7 / 0 8
A m o u n t :
$ 1 , 9 0 0 , 0 0 0
S o u r c e o f F u n d s :
C M A Q a n d
M e a s u r e A
B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t :
Y e s
G L A N o . :
2 2 2 3 1 4 1 4 0 3 P 3 0 1 7 $ 1 , 6 8 2 , 0 0 0
2 2 2 3 1 8 1 1 0 2 P 3 0 1 7 $ 1 , 9 0 0 , 0 0 0
F i s c a l P r o c e d u r e s A p p r o v e d :
��a k v z i n
D a t e :
0 9 / 1 9 / 2 0 0 7
A t t a c h m e n t s :
1 ) A d d i t i o n a l P r o j e c t S c o p e
2 ) P r o j e c t B u d g e t
3 ) L A N E n g i n e e r i n g A d d i t i o n a l S c o p e , R e v i s e d S c h e d u l e , a n d C o s t
A g e n d a I t e m 1 1
3 6
"
"
"
A T T A C H M E N T 1
A D D I T I O N A L P R O J E C T S C O P E
" R e a l i g n i n g t h e n o r t h f r o n t a g e r o a d , B o x S p r i n g s R o a d , ( 4 - 5 l a n e s w i d e )
" D e m o l i s h t h e e x i s t i n g f r o n t a g e r o a d a n d b r i d g e o v e r t h e R a i l r o a d ( R R ) t r a c k s
" C o n s t r u c t a n e w b r i d g e o v e r t h e R R t r a c k s f o r t h e f r o n t a g e r o a d
" W i d e n t h e n o r t h b o u n d ( N B ) 1 - 2 1 5 b r i d g e o v e r t h e R R t r a c k s
I n c l u d e C a ! t r a n s D e s i g n S e q u e n c i n g C o n s t r u c t i o n E l e m e n t s
- E a s t J u n c t i o n o r i g i n a l B r i d g e W i d e n i n g S c o p e ( p r o p o s e d c o n t r a c t c h a n g e
o r d e r f o r D e s i g n S e q u e n c i n g p r o j e c t )
- F i n a l W i d e n i n g o f B r i d g e t o i t s u l t i m a t e w i d t h
" R e - a l i g n t h e N B o f f - r a m p t o B o x S p r i n g s i n t e r c h a n g e
R e a l i g n t o r a m p ' s u l t i m a t e l o c a t i o n
" A d d a t h i r d l a n e t o t h e w e s t b o u n d ( W B ) S R - 6 0 c o n n e c t o r t o a c t a s a
D e c e l e r a t i o n L a n e a b o u t 3 0 0 m l o n g ( n o t t h e f u l l t h i r d l a n e b a c k t o D a y S t r e e t )
" U t i l i t y R e l o c a t i o n , C o o r d i n a t i o n a n d / o r P r o t e c t i o n
" R i g h t o f W a y E n g i n e e r i n g f o r t h e a c q u i s i t i o n o f p r o p e r t i e s f o r t h e
t h e r e a l i g n m e n t o f B o x S p r i n g s R o a d
t h e w i d e n i n g o f W B 1 - 2 1 5 / S R - 6 0 p r i o r t o B o x S p r i n g s O v e r c r o s s i n g
" E n v i r o n m e n t a l P e r m i t t i n g f o r f r o n t a g e r o a d r e l o c a t i o n a n d u t i l i t y r e l o c a t i o n s
3 7
"
A T T A C H M E N T 2
P R O J E C T B U D G E T S U M M A R Y
I - 2 1 5 / S R - 6 0 E a s t J u n c t i o n P r o j e c t
I N T H E C O U N T Y O F R I V E R S I D E
E A 0 8 - 4 4 9 3 1 1
0 7 - 3 1 - 0 3 9
- 2 1 5 1 S R - 6 0 E a s t J u n c t i o n
P r e v i o u s P r o j e c t
B u d g e t
A d d i t i o n a l B u d g e t
R e q u i r e d
N e w P r o j e c t e d
B u d g e t
R i g h t o f W a y
$ 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 0
$ 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0
D e s i g n
$ 2 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 1 , 9 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 4 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 .
R o a d w a y C o n s t r u c t i o n
$ 2 6 , 6 7 5 , 0 0 0
$ 1 6 , 5 1 0 , 0 0 0
$ 4 3 , 1 8 5 , 0 0 0
C o n s t r u c t i o n M a n a g e m e n t /
C o n s t r u c t i o n S u p p o r t
$ 2 , 1 7 5 , 0 0 0
$ 1 , 9 8 2 , 0 0 0
$ 4 , 1 5 7 , 0 0 0
G R A N D T O T A L
$ 3 5 , 3 5 0 , 0 0 0
$ 2 0 , 3 9 2 , 0 0 0
$ 5 5 , 7 4 2 , 0 0 0
3 8
"
"
"
A T T A C H M E N T 3
L A N E N G I N E E R I N G
A D D I T I O N A L S C O P E , R E V I S E D S C H E D U L E , A N D C O S T
3 9
" 5 / S R - 6 0 E a s t J u n c t i o n E W H O V C o n n e c t o r s C o s t P r o p o s a l
"
"
E S T I M A T E P R O P O S A L P S & E - S c o p e I n c r e a s e N B U l t i m a t e
S c o p e i n c r e a s e
P r o j e c t
S e n i o r
C i v i l
C i v i l B r i d g e
E n g i n e e r
C i v i l
E n g i n e e r
A s s i s t .
E n g i n e e r
S e n i o r
E n g i n e e r
B r i d g e
E n g i n e e r
A s s i s t .
B r i d g e
E n g i n e e r
C A D D
A d m i n !
C l e r i c a l
L A N R o l l U p
S u b c o n s u l t a n t
T e s t i s M a n a g e r
A S S U M P T I O N S
C l a s M c a t i o n s
A v e r a g e D i r e c t H o u r l y R a t e b y C 1 3 3 1 6 c s e o n
F e e R a t e = 1 0 . 3 6 O H R a t e = 1 2 3 . %
3 5 9 . 0 0
$ 2 0 0 . 0 0
3 5 9 . 0 0
$ 1 e 0 . 0 0
W e e
$ 1 4 5 0 0
$ 3 5 . 0 0
$ 8 5 . 8 5
$ 5 9 0 5
S 1 8 0 . 0 0
$ 4 7 a 0
$ 1 4 5 . 0 0
$ 3 5 0 0
$ 8 5 . 8 6
5 3 5 0 0
$ 8 5 . 8 8
M o o
$ 5 1 . 3 3
8 , 9 8 4
$ 1 2 1 1 3 8 7
1 2 , 5 0 0
0
$ 3 0 9 , 1 8 4
$ 0
$ 1 , 5 3 3 , 0 7 1
T a s k D e s c r i p t i o n s
F i r m / F i r m s
A s s i g n e d t o
T a s k
E s t i m a t e d H o u r s p e r T a s k
H i s L a b o r
S u b t o t a l
S u b t o t a l
����
H r s S u b t o t a l
L a b o r
S u b t o t a l
O D C
S u b t o t a l
W B S 1 0 0 P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t / C o n t r o l s A M A P M f o r a n e x t r a 1 2 - 1
L A N
5 0
5 0
1 0 0
$ 1 7 , 2 5 0
$ 1 7 , 2 5 0
W B S 2 0 5 O B T P E R M I T S / A G R E M N T S & R O U T E A D O P T I O N S
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 0 5 0 5 D e t e r m i n e R e q u i r e d P e r m i t s P o s s i b l e d e l e n i a t i c n o f w e t a
L A N
$ 1 , 5 2 5
5
5
1 0
$ 1 , 5 2 5
W B S 2 0 5 . 1 0 O b t a i n P e r m i t s P o s s i b l e 1 6 0 2 o r 4 0 1 o r 4
L A N
1 0
1 0
2 0
$ 2 , 3 0 9
$ 2 , 3 0 9
W B S 2 0 5 . 1 5 O b t a i n R a i l r o a d A g r e e m e n t s R C T C t o h a n d s ! . A l r e a d y
D o u g l a s E n g _
$ 0
W B S 2 0 5 . 2 5 P r e p a r e A g r e e m e n t f o r M a t e r i a l s S i t e s ( ' d d e e d e d ) n o n e
L A N
0
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 1 0 0 . 1 5 P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t - P S & E C o m p o n e n t A d n l P M w o r k o n P S & E
L A N
7 0
7 0
$ 1 4 , 0 0 0
$ 1 4 , 0 0 o
W B S 1 0 5 P R E P B A S E M A P S & P L A N S H E E T S
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 1 8 5 . 0 5 R e v i e w a n d U p d a t e P r o j e c t I n f o r m a t i o n a d n l e f f o r t
L A N
0
0
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 1 8 5 . 1 0 P e r f o m l D e s i g n S u r v e y s A d n i s u r v e y w o r k r q d
A s s o c i a t e d
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 1 8 5 , 1 0 S u r v e y i n g C o o r d i n a t i o n / M a n a g e m e n t R R & T i e - i n
A s s o c i a t e d
$ 0
W B S 1 8 5 . 1 0 C o n t r o l S u r v e y & B a s e D a t a R e v i e w R A N a c q u i s i t i o n
A s s o c i a t e d
$ d
W B 5 1 8 5 . 1 0 P r e p a r e B a s e M a p p i n g P a r c e l d e s c r i p t i o n s
A s s o c i a t e d
$ 0
W B S 1 8 5 . 1 0 D e s i g n D a t a S u r v e y s
A s s o c i a t e d
$ 0
W B S 1 8 5 . 1 5 P e r f o r m P r e l i m i n a r y D e s i g n / U p d a t e G e o m e t r i c A p p r o v a l D r a w i n g s R e v i s e C A D ' s
L A N
0
0
0
0
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 1 8 8 . 2 0 P r e p a r e E n g i n e e r i n g R e p o r t s
L A N
0
0
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 1 8 5 . 2 0 . 1 0 H y d r o l o g y a n d H y d r a u l i c s R e p o r t a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
4 0
0
4 5
$ 6 , 8 0 0
$ 6 , 8 0 0
W B S 1 8 5 2 0 . 1 5 G e o t e c h n i c a l R e p o r t / P a v e m e n t / M a t e r i a l s F r o n t a g e R d a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
K l e i n f e l d e r
8 2 4 , 2 9 1
$ 2 4 , 2 9 1
W B S 1 8 5 2 0 . 1 5 G e o t e c h n i c e l R e p o r t / P a v e m e n t / M a t e r i a l s T i e - B a c k W a l l U s e C a l t r a n s d a t a
K l e i n f e l d e r
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 1 8 5 . 2 0 . 1 5 G e o t e c h n i c a l R e p o r l / P a v e m e n t / M a t e d a l s R C B a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
K l e i n f e l d e r
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 1 8 5 . 2 5 D e t e r m i n e R i g h t o f W a y R e q u i r e m e n t s N E W W O R K
L A N
1 0
1 0
2 0
4 0
$ 4 , 5 7 6
$ 4 , 5 7 6
W B S 1 9 0 P R E P S T R U C S I T E P L A N S N E W W O R K
L A N
2
4
4
8
1 8
$ 2 , 3 0 7
$ 2 , 3 0 7
W B S 2 1 0 P R E P P R E L I M S T R U C D S G N D A T A
W B S 2 1 0 . 0 4 T y p e S e l e c t i o n R p t / M t g - F r o n t a g e r o a d N E W W O R K
L A N
2 4
1 6
1 0 0
1 0 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
4 8 0
$ 5 8 , 4 8 6
2 , 0 0 0
$ 5 0 , 4 5 6
W B S 2 1 0 . 0 5 T y p e S e l e c t i o n R p t / M t g - N B U l t N E W W O R K
L A N
2 4
1 6
6 5
6 5
7 5
1 2 0
3 6 5
$ 4 3 , 9 2 7
$ 4 3 , 9 2 7
W B S 2 1 0 . 0 1
L A N
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 1 0 . 0 2
L A N
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 1 0 . 0 3
L A N
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 1 5 . 5 0 F o u n d a t i o n F i e l d I n v e s t g a s o n F r o n t a g e R d N E W W O R K
K l e i n f e l d e r
$ 2 3 , 3 2 9
$ 2 3 , 3 2 9
W B S 2 1 5 . 5 0 F o u n d a t i o n F i e l d l n v e s t g a t i o n T i e - b a c k w a l l U s e C a l t r a n s d a t a
K l e i n f e l d e r
$ 0
$ 0
W B 5 2 1 5 . 5 0 F o u n d a t i o n F i e l d l n v e s t g a t i o n R C B N E W W O R K
K l e i n f e l d e r
S O
$ 0
W B S 2 1 5 . 5 5 F o u n d a t i o n R e p o r t a n d L o g o f T e s t B o r i n g s F r o n t a g e R d N E W W O R K
K l e i n f e l d e r
$ 4 5 , 7
9 i 4 5 , 7
W B S 2 1 5 . 5 5 F o u n d a t i o n R e p o r t a n d L o g o f T e s t B o r i n g s T i e - B a c k W a l l U s e C a l t r a n s d a t a
K l e i n f e l d e r
S O
$ 0
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 1 5 . 5 5 F o u n d a t i o n R e p o r t a n d L o g o f T e s t B o r i n g s R C B N E W W O R K
K l e i n f e l d e r
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 1 5 P R E P S T R U C G E N E R A L P L A N S
$ 0
W B S 2 1 5 . 0 4 P r e p a r e S t r u c t u r e G e n e r a l P l a n s f o r S t r u c t u r e s - F r o n t a g e r o a d N E W W O R K
L A N
8
2 4
3 2
3 2
4 0
1 3 6
$ 1 6 , 2 5 2
$ 1 6 , 2 6 2
W B S 2 1 5 . 0 5 P r e p a r e S t r u c t u r e G e n e r a l P l a n s f o r S t r u c t u r e s - N B U l t N E W W O R K
L A N
5
2 4
3 2
3 2
4 0
1 3 8
$ 1 6 , 2 8 2
$ 1 6 , 2 6 2
W B S 2 1 5 . 0 6 P r e p a r e S t r u c t u r e G e n e r a l P l a n s f o r S t r u c t u r e s - T i e - b a c k w a l l N E W W O R K
D o k k e n
$ 6 , 8 8 5
$ 8 , 6 8 6
W B S 2 1 5 . 0 2
L A N
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 1 5 . 0 3
L A N
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 4 0 P R E P D R A F T S T R U C P S & E
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 4 0 . 0 4 P r e p a r e D r a f t S t r u c t u r e P S & E f o r S t r u c t u r e s - F r o n t a g e r o a d N E W W O R K
L A N
2 4
3 2 0
4 0 0
4 2 0
4 8 0
1 , 6 4 4
$ 1 9 1 , 2 7 2
2 , 0 0 0
$ 1 9 3 , 2 7 2
W B S 2 4 0 0 5 P r e p a r e D r a f t S t r u c t u r e P S & E f o r S W c t u r e s - N B U l t N E W W O R K
L A N
2 4
2 9 0
3 6 5
3 7 5
4 8 0
1 , 5 3 4
$ 1 7 7 , 6 3 3
2 , 0 0 0
$ 1 7 9 , 5 3 3
W B S 2 4 0 0 8 P r e p a r e D r a f t S t r u c t u r e P S & E f o r S t r u c t u r e s - T i e - b a c k w a l l N E W W O R K
D o k k e n
$ 3 1 4 2 5
$ 3 1 , 4 2 5
W B S 2 4 0 . 0 2
L A N
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 4 0 . 0 3
L A N
-
$ 0
$ 0
V M S 2 4 0 0 4 . 1 5 C h e c k D e s i g n & P l a n S h e e t s - F r o n t a g e R o a d N E W W O R K
L A N
2 4
1 0 0
1 4 0
1 4 0
1 2 0
5 2 4
$ 5 3 , 4 2 3
7 5 0
$ 6 4 , 1 7 3
W B S 2 4 0 . 0 5 . 1 5 C h e c k D e s i g n & P l a n S h e e t s - N B U l t N E W W O R K
L A N
2 4
8 5
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 0 0
4 4 9
$ 5 4 , 6 8 9
7 5 0
$ 5 5 , 4 3 9
W B S 2 4 0 . 0 5 . 1 5 C h e c k D e s i g n & P l a n S h e e t s - T i e - b a c k w a l l N E W W O R K
D o k k e n
$ 2 7 , 0 6 4
8 2 7 , 0 0 4
W B S 2 4 0 . 0 2 . 1 5
D o k k e n
$ 0
W B S 2 4 0 0 3 . 1 5
D o k k e n
$ 0
W B S 2 5 0 P R E P F N L S T R U C P S & E P K G
-
$ 0
$ 0
N B S 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 4 F i n a l i z e S t r u c t u r e s P S & E P a c k a g e - F r o n t a g e r o a d N E W W O R K
L A N
2 4
1 0 5
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 6 0
8 0 9
$ 9 2 , 4 0 3
2 , 5 0 0
$ 9 4 , 9 0 3
W B S 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 5 F i n a l i z e S t r u c t u r e s P S & E P a c k a g e - N B U l t N E W W O R K
L A N
2 4
1 0 5
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 6 0
8 0 9
$ 9 2 . 4 0 3
2 , 5 0 0
$ 9 4 , 9 0 3
W B S 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 8 F i n a l i z e S t r u c t u r e s P S & E P a c k a g e - T i e - b a c k w a l l N E W W O R K
D o k k e n
$ 5 , 9 9 6
$ 5 , 9 9 5
W B S 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 2
L A N
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 3
L A N
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 3 0 P R E P D R A F T P S & E
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 3 0 . 0 5 P r e p a r e D r a f t R o a d w a y P l a n s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
4 0
7 5
7 5
1 9 0
$ 2 3 , 7 1 4
$ 2 3 , 7 1 4
W B S 2 3 0 . 1 5 P r e p a r e D r a f t T r a f f i c P l a n s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L i n C o n s u l t i n g
f s T u -
V V B S 2 3 0 . 1 5 P r e p a r e D r a f t T r a f f i c P l a n s ( S t a g i n g ) a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
1 0
1 5
1 0
4 0
$ 5 , 6 3 4
$ 5 , 5 3 4
W B S 2 3 0 . 2 0 P r e p a r e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e m e n t P l a n ( T h 1 S j a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L i n C o n s u l t i n g
$ 0
W B 5 2 3 0 . 2 5 P r e p a r e D r a f t U t i l i t y P l a n s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
4 0
4 5
$ 4 , 2 3 4
$ 4 , 2 3 4
W B S 2 3 0 . 3 3 P r e p a r e D r a f t D r a i n a g e P l a n s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
1 5
4 0
4 0
9 5
5 1 1 , 8 3 4
$ 1 1 , 6 3 4
W B S 2 3 0 . 3 5 P r e p a r e D r a f t S p e c i f i c a t i o n s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
1 5
2 0
1 0
4 5
$ 5 , 9 1 3
$ 5 , 9 1 3
W B S 2 3 0 3 5 P r e p a r e D r a f t S p e n f i c e t i o n t a d d d i o n a l e o n
- ' L i n C o n s u l t i n g '
$ 8 9 4
S L 1 9 4
W B S 2 3 0 . 4 0 P r e p a r e D r a f t P S & E Q u a n t i t i e s a n d E s t i m a t e s . a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L i n C o n s u l t i n g
$ 6 2 2
$ 6 2 2
W B S 2 3 0 . 4 0 P r e p a r e D r a f t P S & E Q u a n t i t i e s a n d E s t i m a t e s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
5
2 5
1 0
4 5
$ 4 , 2 8 5
$ 4 , 2 8 5
W B S 2 3 0 . 5 5 I n c o r p o r a t e S t r u c t u r e s D r a f t P S & E a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
5
1 0
$ 1 , 5 2 5
$ 1 , 5 2 5
W B S 2 3 0 . 8 0 R e v i e w a n d U p d a t e P r o j e c t I n f o r m a t i o n f o r P S & E P a c k a g e a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
5
1 0
$ 1 , 5 2 5
$ 1 , 5 2 5
4 0
"
"
5 / S R - 6 0 E a s t J u n c t i o n E W H O V C o n n e c t o r s C o s t P r o p o s a l
E S T I M A T E P R O P O S A L P S & E - S c o p e I n c r e a s e N B U l t i m a t e
S c o p e i n c r e a s e
C l a s f i c a t i o n s
P m 1 w t
M a n a g e r
S e n i o r
C i v i l
E n g i n e e r
C i v i l
E n g i n e e r
A s s i s t .
C i v i l
E n g i n e e r
S e n i o r
B r i d g e
E n g i n e e r
e n t l g e
E n g i n e e r
A s s i s t .
B r i d g e
E n g i n e e r
C A O D
A d m i N
C l e r i c a l
L A N R o l l U p
S u b c o n s u l t a n t
T o t a l s
A S S U M P T I O N S
A v e r a g e D i r e c t H o d y R a f e b y C i e s l a c a l l a n
F e e R a t e = 1 0 . % O H R a t e = 1 2 3 . %
$ 5 8 . 0 0
5 2 0 0 . 0 0
$ 5 9 0 0
$ 1 0 0 . 0 0
$ 4 7 . 0 0
$ 1 4 5 . 0 0
$ 3 5 0 0
5 8 5 8 6
$ 5 8 0 0
$ 1 6 0 . 0 0
S 4 ) . 0 0
$ 1 4 5 0 0
5 3 5 . 0 0
W A S
S 9 5 . 0 0
M A O
$ 2 5 0 0
$ 6 1 . 3 3
8 , 9 8 4
$ 1 , 2 1 1 , 3 8 7
1 2 , 5 0 0
0
$ 3 0 9 , 1 6 4
$ 0
5 1 , 5 3 3 , 0 7 1
T a s k D O S C T I p g O n 3
F i n n / F i r m s
A s s i g n e d t o
T a s k
E s t i m a t e d H o u r s p e r T a s k
H n
S u b t o t a l
L a b o r S u b t o t a l
O D C
H r s S u b t o t a l
L a b o r
O D C
S u b t o t a l
S u b t o t a l
W E T S 2 5 6
C I R C U L A T F J R E V & P R E P F N L D I S T R I C T P S & E P R O
S O
$ p
W B S 2 5 5 . 0 5
C i r c u l a t e & R e v i e w D r a f t D i s t r i c t P S & E P a c k a g e a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
5
$ 7 2 5
$ 7 2 5
W B S 2 5 5 . 1 0
U p d a t e P S & E P a c k a g e a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
1 0
1 5
3 0
$ 3 , 5 3 8
$ 3 , 5 3 8
W B S 2 5 5 . 1 0
' - _ _ ' $
L i n C o n s u l t i n g
$ 7 , 9
$ 7 , 9
U p d a t e P S & E P a c k a g e
D o k k e n
$ 0
D
$ 0
o
W B S 2 5 5 . 1 5
P e r f o r m E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e e v a l u a t i o n ( 8 n e e d e d ) A l l c o s t s f o r L S A i n c l u d e d u r
L S A
$ 0
P M 1 0 / 2 . 5
L S A
$ 0
A i r Q u a l i t y U p d a t e O p t i o n a l
L S A
$ 0
N E S ( M I )
L S A
$ 0
R e - e v a l u a t i o n / V a l i d a t i o n
L S A
$ 0
O p t i o n a l C o m p r e h e n s i v e T e c h n i c a l U p d a t e
L S A
$ 0
M e e t i n g s / P r o j e c t M a n a e m e n t
L S A
$ 0
W B S 2 5 5 . 2 0
P r e p a r e F i n a l D i s t r i c t P S & E P a c k a g e = , " ' � a d t l i t i o n a 6 e t f o t t . .
L i n C o n s u l t i n g
$ 4 8 7 8
$ 4 j 6 7 $
V V B S 2 5 5 . 2 0
P r e p a r e F i n a l D i s t i n c t P S & E P a c k a g e a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
1 7 0
4 4 3
5 2 0
1 , 1 3 3
$ 1 3 6 , 0 8 0
$ 1 3 6 , 0 8 0
W B S 2 5 5 . 2 5
P r e p a r e G e o t e d l n i c a l I n f o m l a t i o n H a n d o u t a d d i t i o n a l e f f o d
L A N
5
5
$ 7 2 5
$ 7 2 5
V V B S 2 5 5 . 3 0
P r e p a r e M a t e r i a l s I n f o r m a t i o n H a n d o u t a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
5
$ 7 2 5
$ 7 2 5
W B S 2 5 5 . 3 5
P r e p a r e S t a k i n g N o t e s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
A s s o c a t e d
$ 1 0 0 0
$ 1 0 0 0
W B S 2 5 5 . 4 0
P r e p a r e R e s i d e n t E n g i n e e r s F i l e a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
5
1 5
2 5
$ 2 , 8 1 3
$ 2 8 1 3
V M S 2 6 0
P R E P C O N T R A C T R O C S ( R e a d y t o L t a t / A d v e r d s e )
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 6 0 . 0 5
P S & E R e c e i v e d a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
2
5
7
$ 1 , 0 4 5
$ 1 0 4 5
W B S 2 6 0 . 1 0
P r o d u c e C h e c k P r i n t s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
5
$ 4 2 9
$ 4 2 9
W B S 2 6 0 . 1 5
P r e p a r e D r a f t C o n t r a c t D o c u m e n t s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
1 0
1 0
1 0
3 0
$ 3 , 9 0 9
$ 3 , 9 0 9
W E S 2 6 0 . 1 5 . 3 0
E n v i r o n m e n t a l C e r t i f i c a t i o n a t R T L n o i n c r e a s e
L A N
0
0
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B 5 2 6 6
A D V E R T I S E / O P E N B I D S / A W A R D & A P P R O V E C O N T R A C T
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 6 5 . 0 5
P r e p a r e P r o j e c t f o r A d v e r t i s i n g a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
$ 0
$ O
W B S 2 6 5 . 2 5
R e s p o n d t o I n q u i r i e s ( A D V E R T I S E / A W A R D ) a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
-
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 1 0 0 . 2 5
P r o t e c t M a n a g e m e n t - R i a h l o f W a y C o m p o n e n t N E W W O R K
4 0
4 0
$ 8 0 0 0
$ 8 0 0 0
W B S 2 0 0
C O O R D I N A T E U T I L
"
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 0 0 . 0 5
P e r f o r m P r e l i m i n a r y U t i l i t y V e r i f i c a t i o n a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
5
1 0
$ 1 , 2 2 9
$ 1 , 2 2 9
W B S 2 0 0 . 1 0
D e t e r m i n e U t i l i t y L o c a t i o n s ( P o t h o l i n g ) a n d P r e p a r e C o n f l i c t M a p s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5
5
1 0
$ 1 , 5 2 5
$ 1 , 5 2 5
A B S 2 0 0 . 1 0
P o t h o l i n g a n d U t i l i t y S u r v e y i n g a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
A s s o c i a t e d
$ 1 0 0 0
$ 1 0 0 D
W B S 2 0 0 . 1 5
U t i l i t y C o n f l i c t R e s o l u t i o n a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
1 0
1 0
$ 1 , 6 0 0
$ 1 , 6 0 0
W B S 2 0 0 2 0
I m p l e m e n t 1 t y R e l o c a t i o n P l a n a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
D o u g l a s E n o _
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 0 0 2 5
M a n a g e t h e J 6 6 t y R e l o c a t i o n a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
D o u g l a s E n q _
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 2 2 0
P E R F R 1 W E N G R G
$ o
$ 0
W B S 2 2 0 . 0 5
R e t r a c e a n d P e r p e t u a t e F r o s t i n g L a n d N e t f o r R A N A c q u i s i t i o n N E W W O R K
A s s o c i a t e d
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 0
W B S 2 2 0 . 1 5
P r e p a r e R i g h t o f W a y M a p s ( i f R e q u i r e d ) N E W W O R K
A s s o c i a t e d
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 0
W B S 3 0 0
P E R F F N L R / W E N G R G A C T I V I T I E S
$ 0
$ 0
W B S 3 0 0 . 0 5
M o n u m e n t t h e R i g h t o f W a y a n d P r e p a r e M o n u m e n t a t i o n M a p s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
A s s o c i a t e d
$ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0
$ 1 , 0 0 0
V V B S 3 0 0 . 3 5
P r e p a r e R i g h t o f W a y R e c o r d M a p a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
A s s o c i a t e d
$ 1 0 0 0 0 0
$ 1 0 0 0
W B S 1 0 0 . 2 0
P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t - C o n s t r u c t i o n C o m p o n e n t
1 5 0
4 0
$ 3 3 , 4 3 4
S 3 3 , 4 3 4
W B S 2 7 0
P E R F C O N S T R E N G R G & G E N E R A L C O N T R A C T A D M I N ( S u p p o r t ) a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
4 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
1 0
-
$ 2 5 , 0 9 8
$ 2 5 , 0 9 8
V V B S 2 7 0
C o n s t r u c t i o n S u p p o r t a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L i n C o n s u l t i n g
$ 4 6 2 . 0 0
$ 4 8 2
W B S 2 8 5
C o n s t r u c t i o n S u p p o r t C C O a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5 0
$ 1 0 , 0 0 0
$ 1 0 , 0 0 0
W B S 2 9 0
C o n s t r u c t i o n S u p p o r t - C l a i m s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
5 0
5 1 0 , 0 0 0
$ 1 0 , 0 0 0
V V B S 2 9 5
A C P T C O N T R A C T / P R E P F N L C O N S T R E S T & P R E P F N L R P T a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
2 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
5
-
$ 1 1 , 2 6 5
$ 1 1 , 2 6 5
W B S 2 9 5 . 1 5
P r e p a r e A s - B u i l t P l a n s a d d i t i o n a l e f f o r t
L A N
4 0
2 0
2 0
3 5 0
2 0
-
$ 4 5 , 3 7 8
$ 4 5 , 3 7 8
4 1
S u b C o n s o n a n t t o t a l s
A E
4 , 0 0 0
L S A
1 0 8 , 4 1 5
L I N
K l i e n
D o k k e n
3 0 , 2 5 2
9 3 , 3 4 6
7 3 , 1 7 1
T O T A L
3 0 9 , 1 8 4
AGENDA ITEM 12
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
S e p t e m b e r 2 4 , 2 0 0 7
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
M i c h a e l B l o m q u i s t , T o l l P r o j e c t M a n a g e r
M a r k M a s s m a n , B e c h t e l P r o j e c t M a n a g e r
K a r l S a u e r , B e c h t e l P r o j e c t C o o r d i n a t o r
T H R O U G H :
E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
A g r e e m e n t w i t h P a r s o n s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n G r o u p t o P r o v i d e
P r e l i m i n a r y E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s , P r o j e c t R e p o r t , a n d ' E n v i r o n m e n t a l
D o c u m e n t f o r . I m p r o v e m e n t s t o S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 i n t h e E a s t b o u n d
D i r e c t i o n a n d t o t h e S t a t e R o u t e 7 1 / 9 1 I n t e r c h a n g e , f r o m
A p p r o x i m a t e l y % M i l e W e s t o f G r e e n R i v e r R o a d t o S e r f a s C l u b
D r i v e i n t h e C i t y o f C o r o n a
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
1 ) A w a r d A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 8 - 3 1 - 0 1 5 - 0 0 t o P a r s o n s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n G r o u p
t o p r o v i d e p r e l i m i n a r y e n g i n e e r i n g s e r v i c e s f o r t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f
C a ! t r a n s p r o j e c t r e p o r t a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l d o c u m e n t ( P R / E D ) f o r t h e
p r o p o s e d i m p r o v e m e n t s t o S R - 9 1 , i n t h e e a s t b o u n d d i r e c t i o n a n d t o
t h e S R - 7 1 / 9 1 I n t e r c h a n g e , f r o m a p p r o x i m a t e l y % m i l e w e s t o f
G r e e n R i v e r R o a d t o S e r f a s C l u b D r i v e i n t h e c i t y o f C o r o n a . A t t h i s
t i m e , s t a f f i s n e g o t i a t i n g w i t h P a r s o n s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n G r o u p a n d s t a f f
e x p e c t s t o c o m p l e t e n e g o t i a t i o n s a n d b r i n g a f i n a l c o n t r a c t t o t h e
O c t o b e r 1 0 , 2 0 0 7 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g ;
2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l - c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e
a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d
3 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
I n o r d e r t o i n i t i a t e p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t o n t h e p r o j e c t s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e 1 0 - Y e a r
W e s t e r n C o u n t y H i g h w a y D e l i v e r y P l a n , s t a f f i n i t i a t e d a r e q u e s t f o r q u a l i f i c a t i o n s
( R F Q ) t o c r e a t e a n a v a i l a b l e l i s t o f c o n s u l t a n t s t o p e r f o r m n e c e s s a r y w o r k o n t h e
P R / E D f o r t h e n e w p r o j e c t s . T h i s s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s w a s c o m p l e t e d a n d r a n k e d a
l i s t o f f i r m s a p p r o v e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n a t i t s J u l y 2 0 0 7 m e e t i n g . S t a f f h a s
A g e n d a I t e m 1 2
4 2
proceeded to negotiate with the firms on this approved Fist in order of ranking and
project size as summarized in the following table.
Corridor
Project Limits
Proposed
Improvements
Total Project
Cost (Millions)
Status
-215
1-15/1-215
Interchange to
Scott Rd.
Add 1 mixed
flow (Mf) lane
each direction
$ 62
Contract
Awarded to
PBS&J in July
2007
1-215
Scott Rd. to
Nuevo Rd.
Add 1 MF Lane
each direction
$173
Contract
Awarded to
PBS&J in July
2007
1-215
Nuevo Rd. to
Box Springs
Rd.
Add 1 high
occupancy
vehicle (HOV)
lane each
direction
$182
Staff currently
negotiating`
with URS
SR-91 /
SR-71
Green River
Rd. to Serfas
Club Dr.
Add eastbound
collector
distributor
system and
direct connector
$99
Staff currently
negotiating
with Parsons
Transportation
Group
1-10
San
Bernardino
County Line to
SR-60
Add eastbound
truck climbing
lane
$47
Staff to start.
negotiation .
with 'HDR as
funds become
available
Staff has been negotiating with Parsons Transportation Group to provide
preliminary engineering services for the preparation of PR/ED for the proposed, .
improvements to SR-91, in the eastbound direction and to the SR-71 /91
Interchange, from approximately IA mile west of Green River 'Road to Serfas.
Club Drive in the city of Corona. At this time, staff is : negotiating with Parsons
Transportation Group and expects to complete negotiations and bring a final
contract to the October 10, 2007 Commission meeting.
Agenda Item 12
43
"
F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n
I n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t :
Y e s
Y e a r :
F Y 2 0 0 7 / 0 8
A m o u n t :
T o b e d e t e r m i n e d
S o u r c e o f F u n d s :
2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A / C o m m e r c i a l P a p e r
B u d g e t A d u s t m e n t :
T B D
G L A N o . :
3 0 3 3 1 8 1 1 0 1 P 3 0 2 1
F i s c a l P r o c e d u r e s A p p r o v e d :
\
D a t e :
0 9 / 1 8 / 2 0 0 7
A g e n d a I t e m 1 2
4 4
u
AGENDA ITEM 13
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
DATE:
September 24, 2007
TO:
Budget and Implementation Committee
FROM:
Min Saysay, 'Program Manager
THROUGH:
Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director
SUBJECT:
Agreement with Spotless Janitorial Services to Provide Cleaning
and Grounds Maintenance for the Five Metrolink Stations in
Riverside County
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Approve selection of and award 'Agreement No. 08-24-023-00 to
Spotless Janitorial Services (SJS) ! to provide cleaning and grounds
maintenance services at the five Commission -owned Metrolink
stations;
2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the
agreement on behalf of the Commission; and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Commission is the owner and operator of ` five Metrolink stations in
Riverside County. Station cleaning and grounds maintenance services are an
important component in attracting the Metrolink rider as well as preserving the
property investments of the Commission.
In June 2007, the Commission authorized staff! to release a request for proposals
(RFP) for cleaning and grounds maintenance services for the Commission -owned
and operated Metrolink stations.
Calendar of Events
Distribution of RFP
Deadline for Proposal Submittal by 2:00 p.m.
Interviews of all Proposers
June 26, 2007
July 24, 2007
August 14, 2007
Consideration by Budget and Implementation Committee September 24, 2007
Commission Approval of Selection October 10, 2007
Agenda Item 13
45
Selection Process
Staff received proposals from four firms. A selection panel was assembled, which
consisted of representatives from the Commission staff, Metrolin'k. and Bechtel.
The selection panel reviewed all proposals and concluded that all four firms would '
be invited to be interviewed by the selection panel. The criteria used by the
selection panel were based on qualifications of the firm, staffing and project
organization, work plan, cost and price, and completeness of response.
The evaluation panel ranked the four firms as follows:
Top Ranked
Spotless Janitorial Services .
Second
Jefferson Transitional Programs
Third
Woods Maintenance Services, Inc
Fourth
Kims Cleaning Service
After careful :evaluation of the ;proposals based on the criteria stated in the ,RFP, the
panel selected SJS as the top ranked company qualified to provide station cleaning
and grounds maintenance services. SJS, as the most responsive bidder,
demonstrates a high quality of service with proactive management and a clear
understanding of the maintenance of the Metrolink stations.
Based on the results of the selection panel, staff recommends the ' contract be
awarded . to SJS for the cleaning and grounds maintenance of the Metrolink
stations. Cost will be based on a firm fixed price and the term of the contract is
three years with two one-year contract extension options to be exercised at the
sole discretion of the Commission.
The total contract value is $19.6.,380. A budget of $38,185 for FY ,2007/08 has
been included in the current fiscal year's budget.
Financial Information
Yes
FY 2007/08
$ 38,185
In :Fiscal Year Budget:'
N/A
N/A
Year:
FY 2008/09
FY 2009/10
Amount:
$ 65,460
$ 65460..
N/A:
FY 2010/11
$ 27,275
Source of Funds:
Local Transportation Funds
Budget Adjustment:
No
GLA No.:
103 24.73317 _P4001, P4002, P4003, P4004, and P4006
Fiscal Procedures Approved:
,1tv
Date:
09/1-8/2007 .
Agenda Item 13
46
AGENDA ITEM 14
"
R I V E R S / D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
S e p t e m b e r 2 4 , 2 0 0 7
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
A a r o n H a k e , S t a f f A n a l y s t
J o h n S t a n d i f o r d , ' P u b l i c A f f a i r s D i r e c t o r
T H R O U G H :
E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l L e g i s l a t i v e . U p d a t e
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
1 ) A d o p t a n O P P O S E U N L E S S A M E N D E D p o s i t i o n o n S B 9 7 4 ( L o w e n t h a l ) ;
2 ) A d o p t p r o p o s e d a m e n d m e n t s t o S B 9 7 4 a n d a u t h o r i z e s t a f f t o t r a n s m i t
t h e a m e n d m e n t s t o s t a t e l e a d e r s ;
3 ) A p p r o v e a p r i o r i t y l i s t o f p r o j e c t s f o r f u n d i n g b y a n y c o n t a i n e r f e e
r e v e n u e ;
4 ) A d o p t a n O P P O S E p o s i t i o n o n t h e f o l l o w i n g f e d e r a l b i l l s :
a ) S . 2 0 1 9 ( H u t c h i s o n , R - T e x a s ) ; a n d
b ) H . R . 3 5 1 0 ( P e t e r s o n , R - P e n n s y l v a n i a )
5 ) A d o p t a S U P P O R T p o s i t i o n o f t h e S R - 2 4 1 F o o t h i l l S o u t h t o l l r o a d
e x t e n s i o n ;
6 ) R e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l L e g i s l a t i v e S t a t u s R e p o r t ; a n d
7 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
S t a t e L e g i s l a t i v e U p d a t e
S B 9 7 4 ( L o w e n t h a l ) - C o n t a i n e r F e e s
T h e f i n a l w e e k s o f t h e l e g i s l a t i v e s e s s i o n i n c l u d e d a f l u r r y o f a c t i v i t y s u r r o u n d i n g g o o d s
m o v e m e n t . A s t h e A s s e m b l y h e l d u p a S e n a t e b i l l t o i m p l e m e n t t h e T r a d e C o r r i d o r
I m p r o v e m e n t f u n d ( T G I F ) , f o c u s q u i c k l y s h i f t e d t o l e g i s l a t i o n _ r e g a r d i n g c o n t a i n e r f e e s .
C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f a n d r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s w e r e i n v o l v e d i n n e g o t i a t i o n s o n b i l l l a n g u a g e
t h a t w o u l d h a v e c o m m i t t e d a t l e a s t $ 6 0 0 m i l l i o n o f c o n t a i n e r f e e r e v e n u e t o g r a d e
s e p a r a t i o n s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . W h i l e r e m a i n i n g n e u t r a l o n t h e l e g a l a n d p o l i c y m e r i t s
o f a l e g i s l a t e d c o n t a i n e r f e e , C o m m i s s i o n r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s s o u g h t t o m a x i m i z e R i v e r s i d e
C o u n t y ' s b e n e f i t f r o m a n y b i l l d e a l i n g w i t h r e v e n u e f o r g o o d s m o v e m e n t p r o j e c t s .
A g e n d a I t e m 1 4
4 7
These efforts were put on hold when Senator Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach), the
authorof the container` fee legislation, and Governor Schwarzenegger reached an _
agreement to put the bill aside and work together over the fall on the issue:. Looming
in the backdrop was the prospect of the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach unveiling
an agreement with the private sector on a voluntary . container premium that could
supplant ,the need for a legislated container fee if Riverside County grade separations
are adequately funded. A day later, amendments were made to Senator LLowenthal's
bill without guaranteed funding for Riverside County while creating a regionally
imbalanced joint powers authority responsible for allocating container fee revenue.
While acknowledging Senator Low.enthal's expressed intentions to serve the needs of:
Riverside .County, staff finds the current version of the bill, SB` 974, to be problematic.
Further, staff believes that it is .important for the Commission to register a position on
SB 974 ahead of discussions in Sacramento this fall. While it is likely that a legislated
container fee will be tied up in courts for years before it is implemented and the
prospects of a Governor's veto loom large, the Commission and its allies should seek to.
remain active in any dialogue over new revenue for goods movement projects from any
source. further, the Commission's official participation in bills such ,as SB 974. can
inform the negotiations surrounding voluntary private container premiums and other
funding sources.
Therefore, staff has provided as an attachment to this item a summary and ;analysis of
SB 974, as well as a recommended position and amendments that would better
recognize the goods movement priorities of Riverside County.
Based on the attached analysis of SB 974 as amended on September' 5 2007, staff
recommends the Commission adopt an OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED position on the bill.
Further, staff recommends the Commission adopt the amendments' and project list
contained in the attachment and relay them to state leaders who will be involved in
crafting SB 974 this fall and next year.
End -of -Session Recap of Commission -Sponsored Bills
The Commission was very active in the 2007 legislative session, sponsoring two bills,
which would ultimately require an additional year of work . in the capitol. The
Commission- partnered with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to
co-sponsor AB 1295, authored by Assemblyman Todd Spitzer. The purpose. of the bill
is to -allow OCTA tomodify the franchise which governs the express lanes on SR-91 :so
that the Commission can proceed with extending the . express lanes into Riverside
County, and to authorize the Commission to collect tolls on the Riverside County
extension. Reflecting the two counties' continuing alliance, elected officials and staff
worked throughout the session with Mr. Spitzer to advance the legislation. :The bill
cleared the Assembly Transportation Committee with the help of Chairman Pedro Nava
Agenda Item 14
48
(D-Santa Barbara), but "stalled in Assembly Appropriations Committee. Both agencies
continue to . work with members of the legislature to allow much needed improvements
to SR-91 to go' forward.
On a concurrent path, authorization for planned express lanes on Interstate 15
continues to move forward with the California Transportation Commission (CTC). The
1-15 project will be approved through a processestablished in 2006 by Speaker Fabian
Nunez's AB 1467. The Speaker's bill calls for the CTC to .develop eligibility criteria for
four new high occupancy toll (HOT). lane projects. Following CTC's finding of eligibility,
the 1.15 project will require separate legislation to finalize the Commission's authority
to move forward, which the Commission intends to seek in 2008.
Finally, the Commission sought legislation to enhance the delivery of the Perris Valley
Line (PVL) Metrolink extension. Assemblyman John Benoit (R=Palm Desert) authored
AB 1240 to authorize the Commission to utilize existing contracting authority available
to transit agencies throughout California, including the Southern California Regional Rail
Authority (SCRRA). The legislation stalled when public employee unions opposed the
bill. The Commission continues to work with Assemblyman Benoit and SCR'RA to
shape a_ proposal that will enable the Commission to better deliver the PVL.
Relinquishment of SR-79 and SR-111 Awaits Governor's Decision
A bill authored .by Senator Jim Battin (R-La Quinta) to relinquish portions of SR-79 and
SR-1 1 1 to the cities of Temecula, San Jacinto and Hemet and La Quinta, Indian Wells,
Indio and Palm Desert respectively, is now on the Governor's desk. This bill would
provide cities with greater local control in setting transportation priorities for their
residents:
Federal Legislative Update
Senate Approves Transportation Appropriations
Before recessing for religious holidays in mid September, the U.S. Senate approved the
FY 2008 transportation appropriations bill. The bill includes funding for key
Comrnission priorities:
• PVL Metrolink Extension: $3 million from Senator Feinstein; and
• Alameda Corridor East grade separations in the city of Riverside:
$1 million from Senators Boxer. and Feinstein.
The House of -Representatives approved its version of the FY 2008 transportation
appropriations bill in June; the two chambers will next hold conference to work out
differences between the two bills before sending a final product to the President's desk.
Agenda Item 14
49
However, the final bill will likely spend more than President Bush has requested in his
proposed FY 2008 budget, which sets -up a possible veto from the President.
Texas Senators Introduce Legislation Prohibiting Toll Programs on Interstate Highways
Republican .Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Cornyn of Texas have introduced
S.201.:9 in the U.S. Senate to prohibit the implementation of new tolling programs on
highways built : using federal funds. Although the Senators are responding to
developments in Texas regarding that state's aggressive direction towards _privatizing
infrastructure,if enacted S.2019 could inhibit the Commission's implementation of
planned express lanes on :1-15. Absent a larger legislative vehicle such as a federal
transportation reauthorization bill, it will be difficult for S.2019 to move forward; the
bill could :also merely be a tool for political posturing. Nonetheless, due to its potential
adverse impact on the Commission's adopted delivery plans, staff recommends the
Commission adopt an OPPOSE position on S.2019.
Representative John Peterson (R-Pennsylvania) has also introduced mirroring legislation
in the ' House of Representatives, likely in response to that state's desire to toll` 1-80.
For the same reasons as S.2019, staff recommends an OPPOSE position to H.R. 3510.
Staff suggests that these bills' authors could amend the legislation to be limited in
scope to interstate highways in their home states or exclude the tolling of new
capacity from prohibition.
Transportation Corridor Agencies Request Commission Support of SR-241 Extension
At the August 2007 meeting of the. Budget and Implementation Committee, members
of the committee moved to withhold recording a position on the proposed extension of
the SR-241 toll road in South Orange County. The committee cited concerns about
taking positions on projects in other counties and setting a precedent of interfering in
politically controversial issues outside of the Commission's jurisdiction.
Commission staff has since received formal written correspondence from the
Transportation Corridor Agencies. (TCA), which is the lead agency on the SR-241
extension project, requesting the Commission's support of the project. OCTA has also
officially supported the project. > At the request of Commissioner Jeff Miller, who is
Chairman of the bkounty State Route 91 Advisory Committee, staff has returned to
the Committee with a recommendation to support the extension of the SR-241 toll
road.
Concern over the future of the project has been heightened in recent months as a
provision has been inserted in the House version of the FY 2008 defense appropriations
Agenda (tern 114
•
•
50
"
"
"
a c t , w h i c h w o u l d e l i m i n a t e a n e a s e m e n t f r o m t h e f e d e r a l g o v e r n m e n t w h i c h i s n e e d e d
t o c o m p l e t e t h e p r o j e c t . C o n g r e s s m e n K e n C a l v e r t ( R - C o r o n a ) a n d D a r r e l I s s a ( R - V i s t a )
h a v e b e e n h i g h p r o f i l e s u p p o r t e r s o f t h e p r o j e c t a n d l e a d e r s a g a i n s t t h e a m e n d m e n t t o
t h e d e f e n s e b i l l . A d d i t i o n a l l y , t h e p r o j e c t ' s w e b s i t e i n d i c a t e s o v e r 8 , 0 0 0 i n d i v i d u a l
S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a r e s i d e n t s h a v e o f f i c i a l l y r e g i s t e r e d t h e i r s u p p o r t f o r t h e e x t e n s i o n .
A t t a c h m e n t s :
1 ) S B 9 7 4 ( L o w e n t h a l ) S u m m a r y , A n a l y s i s , A m e n d m e n t s , P r o j e c t L i s t
2 ) C o r r e s p o n d e n c e f r o m T C A
3 ) O C T A L e t t e r o f S u p p o r t f o r S R - 2 4 1
4 ) L e g i s l a t i v e M a t r i x
A g e n d a I t e m 1 4
5 1
"
"
S B 9 7 4 ( L o w e n t h a l )
S u m m a r y , A n a l y s i s , P r o p o s e d A m e n d m e n t s , a n d P r o j e c t L i s t
S u m m a r y
S e n a t e B i l l 9 7 4 ( L o w e n t h a l ) i m p o s e s a $ 3 0 p e r t w e n t y - f o o t e q u i v a l e n t ( T E U ) c o n t a i n e r
f e e o n e a c h c o n t a i n e r p r o c e s s e d t h r o u g h t h e p o r t s o f L o s A n g e l e s , L o n g B e a c h a n d
O a k l a n d . T h e i n t e n t o f t h e c o n t a i n e r f e e i s t o g e n e r a t e n e w r e v e n u e f o r p r o j e c t s t h a t
m i t i g a t e a g a i n s t a i r q u a l i t y a n d i n f r a s t r u c t u r e i m p a c t s o f i n c r e a s i n g t r a d e v o l u m e s
t h r o u g h t h e p o r t s . C o n s i d e r i n g t h e h i g h i m p a c t o n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y o f g o o d s m o v i n g
a l o n g t h e A l a m e d a C o r r i d o r E a s t , e s p e c i a l l y a t a t - g r a d e c r o s s i n g s , t h e c o n t a i n e r f e e
p r o p o s e d i n S B 9 7 4 i s a p o t e n t i a l f u n d i n g s o u r c e f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s p r i o r i t i z e d
p r o g r a m o f g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n s .
S B 9 7 4 a u t h o r i z e s t h e c o n t a i n e r f e e t o b e l e v i e d a t b o t h S a n P e d r o B a y p o r t s b e g i n n i n g
J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 0 9 . . T h e r e v e n u e i s t o b e c o l l e c t e d b y e a c h p o r t a n d r e m i t t e d i n e q u a l
h a l v e s t o t w o s e p a r a t e f u n d s . H a l f o f t h e r e v e n u e w i l l b e d e d i c a t e d t o t h e " S a n P e d r o
B a y P o r t s M i t i g a t i o n R e l i e f T r u s t F u n d , " w h i c h w i l l b e a v a i l a b l e f o r e x p e n d i t u r e b y t h e
S o u t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y M a n a g e m e n t D i s t r i c t ( S C A Q M D ) f o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f m i t i g a t i n g .
a i r p o l l u t i o n c a u s e d b y t h e m o v e m e n t o f c o n t a i n e r c a r g o t o a n d f r o m t h e p o r t s . T h e
o t h e r h a l f o f t h e r e v e n u e w i l l b e d e d i c a t e d t o t h e " S a n P e d r o B a y P o r t s C o n g e s t i o n
R e l i e f T r u s t F u n d . " T h i s f u n d w i l l b e a v a i l a b l e f o r e x p e n d i t u r e b y a n e w j o i n t - p o w e r s
a u t h o r i t y c r e a t e d b y S B 9 7 4 , n a m e d t h e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a G o o d s M o v e m e n t
A u t h o r i t y . T h e e x c l u s i v e p u r p o s e o f t h e c o n g e s t i o n r e l i e f f u n d i s f o r f u n d i n g
i n f r a s t r u c t u r e p r o j e c t s t h a t i m p r o v e t h e f l o w a n d e f f i c i e n c y o f c o n t a i n e r c a r g o t o a n d
f r o m t h e p o r t s .
S B 9 7 4 e x p l i c i t l y s t a t e s t h a t a t - g r a d e c r o s s i n g s o n t h e A l a m e d a C o r r i d o r E a s t i n
R i v e r s i d e , S a n B e r n a r d i n o , O r a n g e , a n d L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t i e s a r e e l i g i b l e f o r f u n d i n g
f r o m t h e c o n g e s t i o n r e l i e f t r u s t f u n d , a s w e l l a s C o l t o n C r o s s i n g , o n - d o c k i n f r a s t r u c t u r e
a t t h e p o r t s , a n d r a i l c a p a c i t y e n h a n c e m e n t s t h a t d o n o t d i s p r o p o r t i o n a t e l y i m p a c t l o w -
i n c o m e c o m m u n i t i e s . P r o j e c t s t h a t i m p r o v e a i r q u a l i t y a r e t o b e g i v e n p r i o r i t y f o r
f u n d i n g . T h e b i l l d o e s n o t s p e c i f y i f n o n - c o n t a i n e r f e e m a t c h i n g f u n d s a r e r e q u i r e d .
T h e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a G o o d s M o v e m e n t A u t h o r i t y i s c r e a t e d b y S B 9 7 4 a s t h e
r e s p o n s i b l e e n t i t y f o r d e v e l o p i n g a o n e - t i m e l i s t o f i n f r a s t r u c t u r e p r o j e c t s t o b e f u n d e d
b y c o n t a i n e r f e e s . T h e A u t h o r i t y c o n s i s t s o f n i n e v o t i n g m e m b e r s , s i x o f w h i c h
r e p r e s e n t L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y . . S B 9 7 4 g i v e s o n e v o t e t o e a c h o f t h e f o l l o w i n g
e n t i t i e s : ( 1 ) P o r t o f L o s A n g e l e s , ( 2 ) P o r t o f L o n g B e a c h , ( 3 ) C i t y o f L o s A n g e l e s , ( 4 )
C i t y o f L o n g B e a c h , ( 5 ) L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y M e t r o p o l i t a n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y , ( 6 )
A l a m e d a C o r r i d o r E a s t C o n s t r u c t i o n A u t h o r i t y , ( 7 ) O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
A u t h o r i t y , ( 8 ) R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n , ( 8 ) S a n B e r n a r d i n o
A s s o c i a t e d G o v e r n m e n t s . A c t i o n b y t h e A u t h o r i t y r e q u i r e s o n l y a m a j o r i t y v o t e .
5 2
Between January 1, 2008 and April 1, 2008 the Authority is required to develop a
priority list of projects to be funded by the container fee and submit it to the California
Transportation Commission (CTC) for approval. The Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) must also be consulted. The CTC must approve a project :list by
September: 1 2008. The Authority can remove projects from the `'list which are fully
funded or are deemed no longer worthy of funding; however, the bill does not appear _
to allow projects to be added or exchanged after CTC approval. The Authority is also
required to hold public hearings to receive input on the project list, with at least one
hearing to be held near the ports.
Analysis
Although the language of SB 974 mandates the Authority to take into account the
entire rail corridor servicing the ports, the governing structure gives de minimis
influence to the non -Los Angeles County corridor, let alone the Riverside County. The
impact of goods movement on the Alameda Corridor East in Riverside, 'San Bernardino
and Orange Counties is well documented and widely acknowledged by elected and
administration officials in Sacramento. Yet, SB 974 does not go far enough to
recognize the air quality, congestion, and quality of life burdens borne by the residents
of !Riverside County.
SB 974 lacks a -sunset date for the container fee or a definition of how much revenue
is to be collected over the Fife of the program and what is the total expected value of
the projects to be funded. Without definitions of how much revenue is to be raised
and what volume of projects is to be funded, there arises uncertainty as to what
should be the scope of the one-time :project list. further, the one-time project Fist does
not contain flexibility for projects: to be added or swapped when projects .become fully
funded or higher priorities arise over the course of the program. In short, the legislation
leaves a great deal of 'latitude over: the scope of the program to a regionally imbalanced
governing board, but only gives it one chance before projects are set in stone.
Finally, 'SB 974 requires the new joint -powers authority: to, "consult" with SCAG in
developing the project list. SCAG's consultation role is left vague in the legislation.
Consultation could be interpreted a variety of ways that could add additional
bureaucratic processes on top of this new government entity .and cornplicate decision -
making. Allowing : broad latitude for participation by another . organization has the
potential to further diminish Riverside County's position, to ensure necessary funding to
goods movement projects in the Inland Empire.
Staff recommendation
Based on the above analysis of SB 974 as amended on September 5, 2007, staff
recommends the Commission adopt an OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED position on the bill.
Further, staff recommends the Commission propose the following amendments to state
leaders who will be involved in crafting SB 974 this fall and next year:
53
"
" G u a r a n t e e a m i n i m u m l e v e l o f f u n d i n g i n s t a t u t e t o e a c h c o u n t y o n t h e A l a m e d a
C o r r i d o r E a s t f o r a n i n i t i a l r o u n d o f g o o d s m o v e m e n t p r o j e c t s , w i t h p r o j e c t
s e l e c t i o n f o r t h i s i n i t i a l r o u n d d e t e r m i n e d b y e a c h c o u n t y ;
" P r o v i d e r e g i o n a l b a l a n c e i n r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o n t h e b o a r d o f t h e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a
G o o d s M o v e m e n t A u t h o r i t y , r e c o g n i z i n g t h e s i g n i f i c a n t i m p a c t s o f g o o d s
m o v e m e n t o n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ;
" P r o v i d e f l e x i b i l i t y f o r p r o j e c t l i s t s t o b e m o d i f i e d a f t e r : t h e i r . a d o p t i o n t o r e f l e c t
c h a n g i n g p r i o r i t i e s a n d f u n d i n g s i t u a t i o n s ;
" S p e c i f y a n o n - c o n t a i n e r f e e m a t c h i n g r e q u i r e m e n t f o r p r o j e c t s f u n d e d b y
c o n t a i n e r . f e e s ; a n d
" D e l e t e t h e r e q u i r e m e n t t h a t S C A G b e c o n s u l t e d i n t h e , a d o p t i o n o f p r o j e c t l i s t s .
F u r t h e r , s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h e C o m m i s s i o n a d o p t t h e f o l l o w i n g l i s t o f g r a d e
s e p a r a t i o n s a s t h e . t o p - p r i o r i t y p r o j e c t s w h i c h s h o u l d b e f u n d e d a s p a r t o f a n y v o l u n t a r y
a g r e e m e n t o r l e g i s l a t i o n t h a t c r e a t e s r e v e n u e f o r g o o d s m o v e m e n t v i a a c o n t a i n e r f e e
o r " p r e m i u m " . T h i s l i s t i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s a d o p t e d G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
F u n d i n g S t r a t e g y ( O c t o b e r 2 0 0 6 ) .
P r i o r i t y
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 5
1 6
1 7
1 8
1 9
2 0
2 1
2 2
2 3
P r o j e c t
C o l u m b i a A v e / B N S F & U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
S u n s e t A v e / U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
A v e 4 8 / D i l l o n R d / U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
C h i c a g o A v e / B N S F & U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
M a g n o l i a A v e / B N S F G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
3 r d S t r e e t / B N S F & U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
M c K i n l e y S t / B N S F G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
M a g n o l i a A v e / U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
I o w a A v e / B N S F & U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
A d a m s S t / B N S F G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
A u t o C e n t e r D r / B N S F G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
C l a y S t / U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
C e n t e r S t / B N S F & U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
S t r e e t e r A v e / U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
M a d i s o n S t / B N S F G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
J u r u p a R d / U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
R i v e r s i d e A v e / U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
H a r g r a v e S t / U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
S m i t h A v e / B N S F G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
7 t h S t / B N S F & U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
T y l e r S t / B N S F G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
2 2 n d S t / U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n .
S a n G o r g o n i o A v e / U P G r a d e S e p a r a t i o n
5 4
J u r i s d i c t i o n
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f B a n n i n g
C i t i e s o f C o a c h e l l a / I n d i o
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f C o r o n a
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f C o r o n a
C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f B a n n i n g
C i t y o f C o r o n a
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f B a n n i n g
C i t y o f B a n n i n g
C o s t ( M )
$ 2 1 . 0
$ 2 1 . 0
$ 2 1 . 7
$ 4 8 . 7
$ 2 6 . 7
$ 3 1 . 7
$ 1 0 9 . 2
$ 2 7 . 2
$ 1 9 . 0
$ 2 4 . 0
$ 2 7 . 0
$ 2 5 . 0
$ 3 6 . 3
$ 3 3 . 7
$ 1 9 . 0
$ 2 6 . 5
$ 2 7 . 0
$ 2 5 . 2
$ 3 1 . 4
$ 2 3 . 0
$ 2 7 . 0
$ 2 3 . 0
$ 2 3 . 5
24 Pafmyrita Av/13NSF & UP Grade Separation City of Riverside $23.0
25 Spruce St/BNSF & UP Grade Separation City of Riverside $27.0
TOTAL $7478
55
4113an Joaquin Hills
orridor Agency
Chairman:
Jim Dahl
San Clemente
•
•
August 28, 2007
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCIES
The Honorable Terry Henderson
RCTC Chairwoman
Riverside County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, 3` I Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
Dear Chairwoman Henderson:
Foothill/Eastern
Corridor Agency
Chairman:
Lance MacLean
Mission Viejo
As Chairman of the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, I am writing to request
your support of the completion of the Foothill Transportation Corridor South, State Route 241.
This is the final 16 mile segment of Orange County's public toll road system and would provide
direct access from State Route 91 in Riverside to Interstate 5 just south of the Orange/San Diego
County line.
The Foothill -South project has been on the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways
since 1981. After six years of analysis by federal resource agencies, an alignment was chosen in .
2006 that accommodates the needs of the traveling public and also provides the most
environmentally sensitive road possible. The Orange County Transportation Authority's long-
term plans assume that the 241 will be completed.
Completing the 241 will benefit all drivers throughout the Southern California region — whether
it's commuters from the Inland Empire or commercial truck traffic from San Diego — by
providing a complete congestion -free option to the I-5 through Orange County.
Again, I respectfully request your support of the completion of the 241, which is crucial to the
quality of life and economic future of the Southern California region.
Sincerely,
Lance MacLean
Chairman
Foothill/Eastem Transportation Corridor Agency
Thomas E. Margro, Chief Executive Officer
125 PACIFICA, SUITE 100, IRVINE, CA 92618-3304 •. P.O. BOX 53770, IRVINE, CA 92619-3770 • 949/754-3400 FAX 949/754-3467
www.thetollroads.com
Members: Aiiiso Viejo • Anaheim . Costa Mesa . County of Orange •:Dana Point Irvine . Laguna Hills • Laguna Niguel . Laguna Woods . Lake Forest
Mission Viejo • Newport Beach • Orange . Rancho Santa Margarita • Santa Ana • San Clemente • San Juan Capistrano . Tustin • Yorba Linda
56
OCTA
AFFILIATED AGENCIES
Orange County
Transit District
Local Transportation
Authority
Service Au homy for
Freeway Emergencies
Consolidated Transportation
Service Agency
Congestion Management
Agency.
Service Autnon ly to
Abandoned Vehicles
February 27, 2007
Transportation Corridor Agencies
The Honorable James Thor
Chairman, Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency
The Honorable Carmen Cave
Chairwoman, SanJuaquin Transportation Corridor Agency
125 Pacifica, Ste. 120
Irvine, CA 92618
Dear Chairman Thor and Chairwoman Cave,
On behalf of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Board of
Directors, I want to reiterate our support for the Foothill Transportation
Corridor South Toll Road extension (Foothill -South).
OCTA's plans rely on the transportation capacity provided by Foothill -South as
an important regional facility that helps reduce future congestion on the 'San
Diego Freeway (1-5) in south Orange County. Additionally, it is included in the
Southern California. Association of Government's (SCAG) Regional
Transportation Plan and Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
OCTA has supported the Foothill -South throughout the project development
process. For example, OCTA approved changes to the 2004 Regional
Transportation Improvement Program that allowed the Transportation Corridor
Agencies (TCA) to reduce the ultimate footprint of Foothill -South from 8, lanes
to 6 lanes. This involved complex air quality conformity findings that allowed
the reduced footprint to move ahead. In addition, the OCTA Board of Directors
unanimously approved the Foothill -South extension in the baseline of the
county's Long Range Transportation Plan on July 24, 2006.
As you are aware, bothOCTA and TCA have conducted traffic forecasts for
the south county area. OCTA -has recently reviewed potential differences
between the two which has been questioned by some stakeholders. Upon
detailed analysis, OCTA has concluded that the TCA model is consistent with
OCTA modeling guidelines and produces similar congestion trends. In short,
construction of the Foothill -South would provide congestion relief to the 1-5 in
south Orange County. AA memo outlining the details of this analysis_ is
attached; however, the following three points summarize the analysis:
• The models are using consistent travel forecasting methodologies
• Both predict similar volumes along study area boundaries
• ... Both predict similar congestion patterns along the I-5 corridor
Orange County Transportation Authority .
550 South Maier Street /P.O. Box 14184lOrange /California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282)
57
February 27, 2007
The Honorable James Thor
The Honorable Carmen Cave
Page 2
OCTA remains strongly supportive of TCA`s efforts to complete Orange
County's toll road system with the Foothill -South and bring needed congestion
relief to the region.
With five shared board members between our agencies, OCTA is fully
engaged in, our joint efforts to improve transportation in Orange County and
the region. We Took forward to our continued partnership.
Sincerely,
Carolyn V. Cavecche
Chairman
CVC:ds
Attachment
cc: Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors
Foothill-Eastem Transportation Corridor Agency Board of Directors
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Board of Directors
Arthur T. Leahy, Chief Executive Officer, OCTA
William Woollett Jr., Chief Executive Officer, TCA
Orange County State Legislative Delegation
Orange County Congressional Delegation
58
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N - P O S I T I O N S O N S T A T E A N D F E D E R A L L E G I S L A T I O
"
. 3 <
F ' : . < w . . . . + ��
r a t e '
> S -
. . . . . \ . . : . . , . . . ��T 4 i ' P . x . q , . a ' f : i q j P i i ! a ��. ��. i ' ��t f . , - . ��, s . C - . > . : Z ��. . \ ' Q . ' . . . . ` h . % C T - . : . f& : . .
% Y . . . s I
. . . w > Q �� r . . . . . . . 1 . Y . ����z h . a ' . : ��y ��' N . ����. " < .
��. 1 ����.
i A ' .
< i . . M ��1 ���� . . . .
S T A T E
L E G I S L A T I O N
A B 2 9 1
( J e f f r i e s &
B e n o i t )
T h i s b i l l r e l i n q u i s h e s s t a t e c o n t r o l o f t h e p o r t i o n s o f S R - 7 4 w i t h i n
L a k e E l s i n o r e c i t y L i m i t s t o t h e C i t y L a k e E l s i n o r e .
H e l d u n d e r s u b m i s s i o n i n S e n a t e
A p p r o p r i a t i o n s C o m m i t t e e
0 8 / 3 0 / 0 7
S u p p o r t
0 4 / 1 1 / 0 7
A B 1 2 4 0
( B e n o i t )
T h i s b i l l a u t h o r i z e s t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
( R C T C ) t o u s e d e s i g n - b u i l d c o n t r a c t i n g i n t h e d e l i v e r y o f t h e P e r r i s
V a l l e y L i n e M e t r o l i n k E x t e n s i o n . R C T C i s t h e s p o n s o r o f t h i s b i l l .
W e a r i n g c a n c e l l e d a t r e q u e s t o f
a u t h o r . T w o - y e a r b i l l .
S u p p o r t
0 4 / 1 1 / 0 7
A B 1 3 5 1
( L e v i n e )
T h i s b i l l e s t a b l i s h e s g u i d e l i n e s . f o r t h e e x p e n d i t u r e o f t h e $ 1 b i l l i o n o f
S t a t e - L o c a l P a r t n e r s h i p F u n d i n g i n P r o p o s i t i o n 1 1 3 . T h e b i l l i s
c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e i n t e n t o f P r o p . 1 B i n s u p p o r t i n g s e l f - h e l p
c o u n t i e s , s u c h a s R i v e r s i d e , m a t c h s a l e s t a x d o l l a r s w i t h s t a t e d o l l a r s
H e l d u n d e r s u b m i s s i o n i n S e n a t e
A p p r o p r i a t i o n s C o m m i t t e e
0 8 / 3 0 / 0 7
S u p p o r t
0 6 / 1 3 / 0 7
A J R 1 4
( J e f f r i e s )
T h i s j o i n t r e s o l u t i o n c a l l s o n t h e P r e s i d e n t o f t h e U . S . a n d C o n g r e s s
t o e n a c t f e d e r a l l e g i s l a t i o n t h a t e n s u r e s a s u b s t a n t i a l i n c r e m e n t o f
n e w r e v e n u e s f r o m c u s t o m s d u t i e s a n d i m p o r t a t i o n f e e s i s d e d i c a t e d
t o g o o d s m o v e m e n t p r o j e c t s i n C a l i f o r n i a a n d o t h e r i m p a c t e d s t a t e s .
E n r o l l e d a n d c h a p t e r e d b y
S e c r e t a r y o f S t a t e 0 7 / 0 3 / 0 7
S u p p o r t
0 4 / 1 1 / 0 7
S B 9
( L o w e n t h a l )
T h i s b i l l i s a n e v o l v i n g v e h i c l e f o r e s t a b l i s h i n g a p r o c e s s f o r t h e
s e l e c t i o n o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t s , t o b e f u n d e d f r o m t h e T r a d e
C o r r i d o r s I m p r o v e m e n t f u n d _ ( T C I F ) o f P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B . T h e T C I F i s a
$ 2 b i l l i o n f u n d .
H e l d u n d e r s u b m i s s i o n i n S e n a t e
A p p r o p r i a t i o n s C o m m i t t e e
0 8 / 3 ` 0 / 0 7
M o n i t o r
0 1 / 1 0 / 0 7
S B 1 9
( L o w e n t h a l )
T h i s b i l l w i l l b e a v e h i c l e f o r e s t a b l i s h i n g c o n d i t i o n s a n d c r i t e r i a f o r
p r o j e c t s t o b e f u n d e d u n d e r t h e $ 1 b i l l i o n a c c o u n t c r e a t e d b y
P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B d e d i c a t e d t o r e d u c i n g e m i s s i o n s r e l a t e d t o g o o d s
m o v e m e n t .
A p p r o v e d b y A s s e m b l y
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e ,
a m e n d e d , a n d r e f e r r e d t o
A s s e m b l y A p p r o p r i a t i o n s
C o m m i t t e e 0 7 / 1 9 / 0 7
M o n i t o r
0 1 / 1 0 / 0 7 .
S B 4 5 ( P e r a t a )
T h i s b i l l w i l l e s t a b l i s h t h e a p p l i c a t i o n p r o c e s s f o r a l l o c a t i o n s f r o m t h e
T r a n s i t S y s t e m S a f e t y , S e c u r i t y , a n d D i s a s t e r R e s p o n s e A c c o u n t
f r o m P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B .
A m e n d e d t o b e c o m e a n
e d u c a t i o n b i l l .
M o n i t o r
0 1 / 1 0 / 0 7
S B 4 7 ( P e r a t a )
T h i s b i l l w i l l e s t a b l i s h t h e e l i g i b i l i t y , m a t c h i n g f u n d r e q u i r e m e n t s , . a n d
a p p l i c a t i o n p r o c e s s f o r P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B f u n d s u n d e r t h e $ 1 b i l l i o n
S t a t e - L o c a l P a r t n e r s h i p P r o g r a m . T h e S t a t e - L o c a l P a r t n e r s h i p
P r o g r a m i s t o b e a d m i n i s t e r e d b y t h e C a l i f o r n i a T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
C o m m i s s i o n ( C T C ) . _ .
R e f e r r e d t o R u l e s C o m m i t t e e -
0 1 / 1 8 / 0 7
M o n i t o r
0 1 / 1 0 / 0 7
5 9
z::
E'
...
�3 sue'
.., .,
�.. , _ � .. �s u,
�'_ "" .,
.. x .., , <..
SB 53
This bill requires- ,Caltrans to establish performance measures that will
Placed on inactive file on ;
Support
2/14/07
(Ducheny)
allow the department to issue an annual rating of the overall quality
of the state highway system. Caltrans would be ' required to report
to the Legislature on how resource, staffing, and
g g,. programming.
decisions impact the overall condition of the state highway system
request of Assemblymember
Bass - '09/04/07
-
(in terms of distressed lane miles, bridge conditions, and life cycle
.
Costs). SB 53 would require Caltrans to consult with agencies such
as-: RCTC in developing its performance measures. "
- -
SB 56
(Runner)
This bill establishes a 10-year pilot program for design -build projects,
administered by the CTC.
Held in Senate Appropriations
Committee under submission -
Support
2/14/07
-
06/01 /07
SB 224 (Battin)
This bill relinquishes state control of SR-111 and SR-79 to local
jurisdictions. SR-1 1 1 is relinquished within the city limits of La
Enrolled and to Governor's desk
- 09/1 1 /07
Support
04/1 1 /07
Quinta, Indian Wells, Indio, and Palm Desert. SR-79 is relinquished
within the city limits of Temecula, San Jacinto and Hemet.
SB 375
This bill would require regional transportation planning agencies to
Held under submission in
Oppose
06/13/07
(Steinberg)
adopt "preferred growth scenarios" that reduce vehicle miles
Assembly Appropriations
traveled per household. The amount of reduced vehicle miles
traveled to be reduced would be part of an emissions inventory to be
completed by CARB. Additional provisions would require the CTC to
adopt guidelines for the use of travel demand models that meet a
number of standards and would require the state to ensure that
projects that are included . in the Federal Transportation Improvement
Committee - 08/30/07
Program reflect this orientation.toward- "preferred growth scenarios."
SB 748
This bill establishes the. criteria for the State -Local Partnership
Set for first hearing in Assembly
Oppose
06./13/07
('Corbett)
program created when voters approved Proposition 1 B. The bill
Appropriations Committee,
Unless
broadly defines agencies who may apply for funding from the
program and also broadly includes voter -approved taxes as eligible
matching funds:
cancelled at request of author -
08/30/07
Amended
SB 872
This bill establishes the criteria for the State -Local Partnership
Held in Senate Appropriations
Support
04/1 1 /07
(Ackerman)
program created when voters approved Proposition 1 B. The bill
allocates $200 million per year statewide over five FY's beginning FY
Committee under submission -"
05/31 /07
10-11. Funding goes only to self-helpcounties and to projects with
a minimum cost of: $25 million.
l9
L0/ L L/L0
ao3.!uoiN
L0/OZ/90 eola!ww00
ainlon.asei jul uo!leLiodsueal
u! pa!npayos dm!ieN
uo!le!s!6al 914. }o Lied asp
s! speomei ya.!nn 6u!.ep.o6eu aoj wspegoew nnau d •s#gafoad-0y!A!0
j.o aaeys !eaapaj. peseenui ue pue 6u!punj !euomppe sepn!ou!
Hp ayl •Aoue!all.la A6aaua .enoidw! pue a6uego .alew!!o ele6mw
d!ay ueo AoHod uo!.evodsue.13.1.egl sAenn sessaappe sep!noad !!!q s!yl
(NW
-Q. 1aelsaag0)
6OLZ '8'H
LO/ l L/170
laoddng
LO/Z L/C0 —
aeu!wwo0 wao1a1:1 1u9wuJ9n00
pup 1g6!siano esnoH
o� palialau :aa1.1.!wwo0 suee!N
'8 sAem esnoH o pa uejeu
'uWuow/00 6 $ o�
do pesingw!eJ eq /quo Aew l!suea3. e!!ynn ta�uow/gL L $ do 6upped
esangw!aa Aew sJeAo!dwe `A!luesaad •yluow/OOZ$ luewes.mgw!ei
6upped pue luewesangw!eJ l!suen aol seeAo!dwe
a!ayl Jell° Aew sieAo!du.we 1.4eueq a.6upl et�� sezn nbe inq s!ul
(VW
-Q `ua9A0DON)
5Lin .a.H
NOL V7SIJ37
7 b'!13033
URGENCY ITEM
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
September 24, 2007
TO:
Budget and Implementation Committee
FROM:
Shirley Medina, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Amendment to Contribution Agreement for 1-215 Corridor
Improvements — Design Sequencing Project for Adjustments to
Funding Plan
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 03-31-064-01, Amendment No. 1 to
Agreement No. 03-31-064 (Caltrans No. 08-1207 A/1); to reflect
adjustments in Measure A funding;
2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and,
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Interstate 215 Corridor Improvement — Design Sequencing project is nearing
completion and will begin opening major project segments starting the end of
2007. The original contribution agreement with Caltrans indicates that
adjustments to funding would require amending the agreement to reflect fund
changes. Commission staff has repeatedly updated funding throughout the
construction of the project to provide the utmost flexibility in delivering this project
on schedule. The adjustments previously approved by the Commission have been
incorporated into the attached draft amendment to Agreement No. 03-31-064
(Caltrans No. 08-1207 A/1).
Staff recommends approving the agreement and authorizing the Executive Director,
pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement.
URGENCY ITEM
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget:
Yes
No
Year:
FY 2007/08
Amount:
$10,000,000
$ 20,000,000
Source of Funds:
Measure A
Budget Ad ustment:
No
Yes
GLA No.:
222 31 81301 P3006
Fiscal Procedures Approved:
\)Uz444,4,it
Date:
09/24/2007
WOMAN] P,
08-Riv-60-PM 11.5/14.0
08-Riv-91-PM 20.3/21.6
08-Riv-215-PM 37.4/43.9
Widen I-215 from 6 to 8 lanes
Construct AUX lanes, truck by-pass
Lane, truck climbing lane, and
Improve mainline and interchanges
EA 334844
District Agreement No. 8-1207 A/1
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT NO. 1 to AGREEMENT NO. 8-1207, entered into effective on
, 2007, is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through
its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as "STATE," and the
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION, a public entity, referred to herein
as "RCTC."
RECITALS
1. STATE and RCTC, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code sections 114 and 130, are
authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to the State Highway
System within RCTC's jurisdiction.
2. The parties hereto entered into Agreement 08-1207 on April 9, 2003, under which a State
Highway improvement consisting of widening Interstate 215 (I-215) from 6 lanes to 8 lanes,
constructing auxiliary lanes, truck by-pass and climbing lane and improving mainline and
interchanges on 1-215, referred to herein as "PROJECT" was to be partially financed.
3. It has been determined that an increase of $30,000,000 is needed to meet PROJECT
obligations and RCTC has agreed to use $30,000,000 of Measure A -Local funds allocated to
PROJECT.
4. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement 8-1207 shall remain in effect. This
Amendment shall deem to be part of the Agreement.
DRAM : September 21, 2007 1
District Agreement No. 8-1207 A/1
IT IS THEREFORE MUTUALLY AGREED:
1. Under State Agrees, Section I, the following Article 5 is hereby added and made a part of
Agreement No. 8-1207 and will read as follows:
I
5. "To submit an initial billing in the amount of $10,000,000 to RCTC immediately
following execution of this Amendment to Agreement. Thereafter, to prepare and
submit progress billing statements to RCTC for construction costs."
2. Under RCTC Agrees, Section II, the following Article 5 is hereby added and made a part
of Agreement No. 8-1207 and will read as follows:
5. "Following execution of this Amendment to Agreement, to deposit with STATE
upon fifteen (15) days of receipt of invoice, the amount of $10,000,000, using
Measure A -Local funds. Said amount shall represent a portion of PROJECT
construction costs. Thereafter, to pay the amount as shown in the progress
statements provided by STATE."
3. Exhibits A and B are replaced in their entirety by the attached new Exhibits A and B.
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE:
DRAFT: September 21, 2007 2
District Agreement No. 8-1207 A/1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
WILL KEMPTON
Director By:
ERIC HALEY
Executive Director
By:
MICHAEL A. PEROVICH
District Director By:
Legal Counsel
BEST, BEST AND KRIEGER
Certified as to Funds:
By:
District Budget Manager
Approved as to Form and Procedure:
By:
Attorney,
Department of Transportation
Certified as to Procedure:
By:
Accounting Administrator
DRAFT: September 21, 2007 3
EXHIBIT "A"
Contribution Letter for State Administered Projects
Date
Local Agency
Agreement No.
State E. A. No.
Revision No.
31-Jul-07
RCTC
08 - 1207
08-RIV-334841
3
Local - Federal
Fund Type
Local - Federal
Contributor
Amount
Reimbursement
Ratio
Match Fund Type
Match Amount
Current Total
Previous Total .
Proposed
Change
CMAQ
$8,374,000
88.53%
TCRP
$1,085,000
$9,459,000
TCRP Subtotal =
$1,085,000
CMAQ
$6,668,000
88.53%
Measure A
$864,000
$7,532,000
RSTP
$13,327,000
88.53%
Measure A
$1,741,000
$15,068,000
Measure A Subtotal = $2,605,000
Grand Total =
$28,369,000
$3,690,000
$32,059,000
Notes:
1) Identify each Local Federal fund type and match on separate lines with current and previous contributor totals towards the State -
Administered project.
2) A separate finance letter is required to identify the type and amount of funds to be authorized, allocated, and/or applied to each phase of
the work by STATE.
3) An amendment to this contribution letter is required for any change to the type and/or amount of funds contributed towards the State
Administered project or changes to the EA.
4) Local Agency is responsible for all programming changes to the RTIP, FTIP and/or STIP.
Local Agency Signature Caltrans Project Manager Signature
D08 05 / 30
EXHIBIT "B11
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF ACCOUNTING
LOCAL PROGRAM ACCOUNTING BRANCH
ATTN: John Peterson
Project sponsored by:
I) State _Yes_
2) Local Agency (Reimbursement work) No
Overhead Rate
Date: July 30, 2007
EA M (Current Phase):
Local Programs Project
Contributor Agency:
'Agreement #:08-1207_Revision
_aiii94
N:
(%)
RCTC
3_
Project Legation: On Rh, 215 From Eucalyptus Ave IC to Columbia Ave IC, On Route 60 from Main St IC to 60/91/215 Jet and from 60/215 Jet to Day St IC,
and On Route 91 from University Ave to 60/91/215 Jct.
State Administrated
Phases of Work «.
***Local Program Funds (51000)
***Local Program Funds (SI000)
'•" Other Funds ($1000)
Totab
Federal %: 88.53
Match%: 11.47
Federal %: 88.53
Match%: 11.47
g gg
`j
t
RIP
z `I
Fund Type: CMAQ
TCRP
M'sure A
RSTP
M'sute
TCRP
Measure
lIP
GRIP
LIP
RIP
STATE SUPPORT
Phase
Ptmn Code: 400.000
710.870
400.000
400.000
400.000
710.870
400.000
025.700
075.600
075.400
025.700
075.600
-
PE/Environmental
"0"
So
Design
"1"
514,148
52,101
$6,685
122,934
R/W Support
"2"
S12,152
S1,997
S14,149
Construction Engineering
"3"
$18,913
$4,935
$6,480
$30,32 18
STATE CAPITAL
Phase
Pegm Code: 400.000
710.870
400.000
_
400.000
400.000
710.870
400.000
025.700
075.600
075.463
025.700
075.600
.�'
s}Yg
@( _ Y-avg
RPM Capital
"9"
512,515
570,366
$24,397
5107,278
Construction Capital
"4"
$15,042
S1,085
$864
513,327
51,741
$34,189
S30,000
531,444
$176,784
$4,699
S26,625
$335,800
m
TOTALS
S15,042
S1,085
$864
513,327
$1,741
534,189
530,000
-
543,959
$247,150
$69,610
511,735
541,787
$510,489
NOTES:
> Identify type of Loral Program Funds such as RSTP, DEMO,
with reimbursement percentages. Also include copy of allocation
> Identity other funds which include State -Federal Funds such as
Developer funds, etc.
> Provide Program codes such as 20.10...(State Support), 20,20....(Stak
o Identity Co-op Agreement / or Contribution Agreement # (include
0o Identify any Sub Jobs for each phase and fund source if applicable
***Include All the hinds requhed for the rarreal tame and a0 the
RCTC advanced 631,324 of Meas A funds through AB 3090 to support
CMiAQ, and type
letter with ST1P
STIP RIP,
Capital),
copy of the
(identify in
Loral Program
of match Funds such as STIP Match, TCRP, SHOPP, Local Sales Tax,
Match.
STIP IIP, State funds such as SHOPP, TCRP and Local funds such as Saks Tax,
See: htto://adse.dotea.eov/ASC/Codine Manuals/cha0ter 07findex.htm
in FY 2006/07.
agreement if not
remarks)
Funds / Match identified
already provided to Local Programs)
in previous phases (include any changes)
The AB 3090 cash reimbursement was received by RCTC
project allocation in FY 2003/04.
(1) Project Manager Name:
(2) Program Coordinator
(3) OLP Area Engineer
Jamal Elsaleh
Calnet: 8-670-6710
Signature*
Signature:
Signature::
Name:
Name:
Calnet:
Calnet::
REMARICS:_This revision (No. 3) is to increase
This amount was approved by RCTC Board
total local Measure hand by $30,000,000.
in July 2007.
ATTACHMENTS:
RTIP/FTIP Listing / Amendments_
Environmental -Clearance
Federal Authonzaion
-R/W Certification
(E76)_ Agreements_
Allocation
Letter: _
-- -
--