Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
06 June 25, 2007 Budget & Implementation
RECORDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA TIME: 9:30 a.m. DATE: Monday, June 25, 2007 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 15t Floor, Riverside ***COMMITTEE MEMBERS*** Rick. Gibbs, Chair / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta Steve Adams, Vice Chair / Dom Betro, City of Riverside Barbara Hanna / Brenda Salas, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / Charles Grotke, City of Blythe Mary Craton / John Zaitz, City of Canyon Lake Gregory S. Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City Eduardo Garcia / Steven Hernandez, City of Coachella Alex Bias / Yvonne Parks, City of Desert Hot Springs Bob Magee / Robert L. Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore Gordon Moller / Alan Seman, City of Rancho Mirage Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula John F. Tavaglione, District Two / County of Riverside Jeff Stone, District Three / County of Riverside ***STAFF*** Eric Haley, Executive Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer ***AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY*** Annual Budget Development and Oversight Countywide Strategic Plan Legislation Measure A Implementation and Capital Programs Public Communications and Outreach Programs Competitive Grant Programs: TEA 21-CMAQ & STP, Transportation Enhancement and SB 821-Bicycle & Pedestrian Property Management SAFE/Freeway Service Patrol TUMF Program and other areas as may be prescribed by the Commission Comments are welcomed by the Committee. if you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. 80798 iverscde County Transportation Commission TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission ' FROM: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board DATE: June 25, 2007 SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts of Interest Issues - Budget and Implementation Committee Agenda of June 25, 2007 The June 25, 2007 agenda of the Budget and Implementation Committee includes items which may raise possible conflicts of interest. An RCTC member may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $ 250 is received in the past 12 months from any entity or individual listed. Agenda Item No. 15 -Award of a Consultant Services Agreement to Parsons Brinckerhoff to Prepare a Project Report and Environmental Document for the State Route 97. Project from State Route 241 to Pierce Street, a State Route 91/Interstate 15 Median Direct Connector and Interstate 15 Median Widening from State Route 91 to Cajalco Road Consultant(s): Parsons Brinckerhoff 685 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 210 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Agenda Item No. 16 - Agreement with David Evans and Associates for the Development of Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate for the Construction of the State Route 74/Interstate 215 Interchange Improvement Project in the City of Perris Consultant(s): David Evans and Associates 800 N. Haven Avenue, Suite 300 Ontario, CA 91764 11.36.06 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N B U D G E T A N D I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O M M I T T E E w w w . r c t c . o r g A G E N D A * * A c t i o n s m a y b e t a k e n o n a n y i t e m l i s t e d o n t h e a g e n d a 9 : 3 0 a . m . M o n d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 7 B O A R D R O O M C o u n t y A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C e n t e r 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , 1 s t F l o o r R i v e r s i d e , C a l i f o r n i a I n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e A m e r i c a n s w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s A c t a n d G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 5 4 9 5 4 . 2 , i f y o u n e e d s p e c i a l a s s i s t a n c e t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n a C o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g , p l e a s e c o n t a c t t h e C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d a t ( 9 5 1 ) 7 8 7 - 7 1 4 1 . N o t i f i c a t i o n o f a t l e a s t 4 8 h o u r s p r i o r t o m e e t i n g : t i m e w i l l a s s i s t s t a f f i n a s s u r i n g t h a t r e a s o n a b l e a r r a n g e m e n t s c a n b e m a d e t o p r o v i d e ' a c c e s s i b i l i t y a t t h e m e e t i n g . . 1 . C A L L T O O R D E R 2 . " P L E D G E O F A L L E G I A N C E 3 . R O L L C A L L 4 . P U B L I C C O M M E N T S - E a c h i n d i v i d u a l s p e a k e r i s l i m i t e d t o s p e a k t h r e e ( 3 ) c o n t i n u o u s m i n u t e s o r l e s s . T h e C o m m i t t e e m a y , e i t h e r a t t h e d i r e c t i o n o f t h e C h a i r o r b y m a j o r i t y v o t e o f t h e C o m m i t t e e , w a i v e t h i s t h r e e m i n u t e t i m e l i m i t a t i o n . D e p e n d i n g o n t h e n u m b e r o f i t e m s o n t h e A g e n d a a n d t h e n u m b e r o f s p e a k e r s , t h e C h a i r m a y , a t h i s / h e r d i s c r e t i o n , . r e d u c e t h e t i m e o f e a c h s p e a k e r t o t w o ( 2 ) c o n t i n u o u s m i n u t e s . A l s o , t h e C o m m i t t e e m a y t e r m i n a t e p u b l i c c o m m e n t s i f s u c h c o m m e n t s b e c o m e r e p e t i t i o u s . " S p e a k e r s m a y n o t y i e l d t h e i r t i m e t o o t h e r s w i t h o u t t h e c o n s e n t o f t h e C h a i r . A n y w r i t t e n d o c u m e n t s t o b e d i s t r i b u t e d o r p r e s e n t e d t o t h e C o m m i t t e e . s h a l l " b e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d . T h i s p o l i c y a p p l i e s t o P u b l i c C o m m e n t s a n d c o m m e n t s o n A g e n d a I t e m s : U n d e r t h e B r o w n A c t , t h e . B o a r d s h o u l d n o t t a k e a c t i o n - o n o r d i s c u s s m a t t e r s r a i s e d d u r i n g p u b l i c c o m m e n t p o r t i o n o f t h e a g e n d a w h i c h a r e n o t l i s t e d o n t h e a g e n d a . B o a r d m e m b e r s m a y r e f e r s u c h m a t t e r s t o s t a f f f o r f a c t u a l i n f o r m a t i o n o r t o b e p l a c e d o n t h e s u b s e q u e n t a g e n d a f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n . Budget and Implementation Committee June 25, 2007 Page 2 • APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 26, 2007 ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add an item to the Agenda after ,- making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Committee. If there are less than 2/3 of the Committee members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) CONSENT. CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 7A. TRANSPORTATION • UNIFORM MITIGATION QUARTERLY REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: FEE • PROGRAM. Receive and file the Transportation. Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial Program Quarterly Report. 'Forward to the Commission for final action.' COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAMMING REQUEST FOR STATE ROUTE 79, THOMPSON ROAD TO DOMENIGONI PARKWAY PROJECT - PHASE Page 5 Overview This item is for the Committee .to: 1 } Approve the county of Riverside's (County) request to program $4 million of Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial funds on the SR-79, Thompson Road to Domenigoni Parkway, widening project for Phase I construction from Thompson Road to Whispering Heights Parkway; and 2) Forward to the. Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee June 25, 2007 Page 3 CITY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAMMING REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE - VAN B•UREN BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE. AT STATE ROUTE 91 - - RIGHT-OF-WAY PHASE Overview Page7 This item is . for the Committee to: 1) Approve the city of Riverside's (City) request to increase the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial funds for right-of-way on the SR-91 /Van Buren Boulevard interchange project from $2 million to $8 million; 2) Approve an increase for expenditures of $6,000,000 in the FY 2007/08 budget; 3) Amend the TUMF agreement; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. FISCAL YEAR 2008-12 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL . IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND. ROADS Overview This item is for the Committee to: Page 9 1) Approve the FY 2008-12 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) for Local Streets and Roads as .submitted; . and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 11. FISCAL YEAR 2007-11 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITY OF COACHELLA Page 11 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve. the FY 2007-1 1 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) .for local streets and roads for the city of Coachella as submitted; and 2) • _ Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee June 25, 2007 Page 4 12. ` FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Overview Page 13 This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the FY 2007/08 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program recommended funding as shown on the attached schedule; and 2) Forward .to :the Commission for final action. 13. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION REVIEW COMMITTEE AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO FUND NEW FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL SEGMENTS Overview Thisitem is for the Committee to: Page 21 1) Approve Agreement No. 07-45-1.32-00 with the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) for $825,000 to fund two new Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) beats; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission., and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 14. - AWARD OF A CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT TO THE FIRST RANKED CONSULTANT TEAM TO PROVIDE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES, PROJECT : REPORTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL 'DOCUMENTS FOR THE INTERSTATE .215 CORRIDOR FROM THE 1 215/1-15 INTERCHANGE TO NUEVO ROAD IN THE CITY OF PERRIS Page 24 Overview This item ;is for the Committee to: Approve the selection and retain the top five ranked consultant teams as part of a pre -qualified ranked list to be used to assist the Commission with ..preliminary engineering services required for :.the preparation, to final approval, of separate project reports (PR) and environmental documents (ED) for proposed improvements to 1-10, " B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 7 P a g e 5 1 - 2 1 5 , a n d S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 , f o r f o u r M e a s u r e A , p r o j e c t s a n d o n e o n - c a l l p r o j e c t , i n W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , w h i c h a r e p r o p o s e d t o b e d e l i v e r e d i n t h e f i r s t f i v e y e a r s o f t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A 1 0 - Y e a r D e l i v e r y - P l a n . T h e l i s t w i l l b e v a l i d f o r a o n e y e a r d u r a t i o n ; 2 ) A w a r d a c o n s u l t a n t s e r v i c e s a g r e e m e n t t o t h e f i r s t r a n k e d c o n s u l t a n t t e a m t o p r o v i d e p r e l i m i n a r y e n g i n e e r i n g s e r v i c e s f o r t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f C a ! t r a n s P R / E D f o r t h e p r o p o s e d i m p r o v e m e n t s t o t h e < 1 - 2 1 5 c o r r i d o r , f r o m t h e 1 - 2 1 5 / 1 - 1 5 I n t e r c h a n g e t o N u e v o R o a d i n t h e c i t y o f P e r r i s . A t t h i s t i m e , t h e f i r s t r a n k e d c o n s u l t a n t ' t e a m h a s n o t b e e n s e l e c t e d . S t a f f e x p e c t s t o b r i n g a r a n k e d l i s t t o t h e C o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g , c o m p l e t e n e g o t i a t i o n s a n d b r i n g a f i n a l c o n t r a c t a t t h e J u l y 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g ; 3 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d 4 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . 1 5 . A W A R D O F A C O N S U L T A N T S E R V I C E S A G R E E M E N T T O P A R S O N S B R I N C K E R H O F F . T O P R E P A R E A P R O J E C T R E P O R T A N D E N V I R O N M E N T A L D O C U M E N T F O R T H E S T A T E R O U T E - 9 . 1 P R O J E C T F R O M S T A T E R O U T E 2 4 1 T O P I E R C E S T R E E T , A S T A T E ' R O U T E 9 1 / I N T E R S T A T E 1 5 ` M E D I A N D I R E C T C O N N E C T O R A N D I N T E R S T A T E ` 1 5 M E D I A N W I D E N I N G F R O M S T A T E R O U T E 9 1 T O C A J A L C O R O A D P a g e 2 8 O v e r v i e w T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e t h e s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s a n d - a w a r d a c o n s u l t a n t s e r v i c e s A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 8 - 3 1 0 0 1 - 0 0 t o P a r s o n s B r i n c k e r h o f f t o p e r f o r m . p r e l i m i n a r y e n g i n e e r i n g s e r v i c e s a n d p r e p a r e a C a ! t r a n s p r o j e c t r e p o r t ( P R ) a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l d o c u m e n t ( E D ) : f o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f p r o p o s e d i m p r o v e m e n t s t o t h e - S R - 9 1 c o r r i d o r , f r o m S R - 2 4 1 t o P i e r c e S t r e e t , i n c l u d i n g t h e p r o p o s e d a d d i t i o n o f a n o r t h b o u n d ( N B ) t o e a s t b o u n d ( E B ) S R - 9 1 / 1 - 1 5 m e d i a n d i r e c t c o n n e c t o r a n d p r o p o s e d i m p r o v e m e n t s t o : 1 - 1 5 f r o m S R - 9 1 t o C a j a l c o R o a d . A t t h i s t i m e t h e c o n t r a c t i s s t i l l i n n e g o t i a t i o n s a n d s t a f f e x p e c t s t o b r i n g a f i n a l c o n t r a c t t o ; e i t h e r t h e C o m m i t t e e o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g ; 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l ; c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d 3 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . Budget and implementation Committee June 25, 2007 Page 6 16. AGREEMENT WITH DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND COST .ESTIMATE : FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STATE ROUTE 74/INTERSTATE 215 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE CITY OF PERRIS 17. Overview This item is for the. Committee to: 1 ) Approve the selection process and award consultant Agreement. No. 07-31-122-00 to David Evans and Associates, Inc. to perform final` engineering services and prepare plans, specifications, and cost estimate (PS&E) for the construction of the SR-74/1-215 Interchange improvement project in the city of Perris based :on the attached project scope, schedule and cost for the base amount of $2,091,662 plus a contingency amount of $218,338 (10.4%), to cover potential changes in scope for a total not to exceed amount of $2,310,000; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director or his designee contingency work as may be required for the project; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. STATE AND FEDERAL .LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item: ;is for the Commission to: 1) Approve .the following bill position:. H.R. 2701 - MONITOR; 2) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and. 3) . forward to the Commission for final action. 18. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 19. COMMISSIONERS STAFF REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report on attended and upcoming meeting/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. " B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 7 P a g e 7 2 0 . A D J O U R N M E N T A N D N E X T M E E T I N G T h e n e x t B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g i s s c h e d u l e d t o b e h e l d a t 9 : 3 0 a . m . , M o n d a y , A u g u s t 2 7 , 2 0 0 7 , B o a r d C h a m b e r s , 1 s t F l o o r , C o u n t y A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C e n t e r , 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , R i v e r s i d e . Absent O RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE ROLL CALL JUNE 25, 2007 Present County of Riverside, District II City of Banning City of Blythe City of Cathedral City . City ofDesert Hot Springs City of Murrieta " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N B U D G E T A N D I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O M M I T T E E M o n d a y , F e b r u a r y 2 6 , 2 0 0 7 M I N U T E S 1 . C A L L T O O R D E R T h e m e e t i n g o f t h e B u d g e t a n d i m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e w a s c a l l e d t o o r d e r b y C h a i r R i c k G i b b s a t 9 : 3 7 a . m . , i n t h e B o a r d R o o m a t t h e C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C e n t e r , 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , ' F i r s t F l o o r , R i v e r s i d e , C a l i f o r n i a , 9 2 5 0 1 . 2 . R O L L C A L L M e m b e r s / A l t e r n a t e s P r e s e n t R o g e r B e r g M a r y C r a t o n _ . E d u a r d o G a r c i a R i c k G i b b s H a n k ' H o h e n s t e i n B o b M a g e e J e f f S t o n e J o h n F . T a v a g l i o n e M e m b e r s A b s e n t S t e v e A d a m s J o s e p h D e C o n i n c k ` G o r d o n M o l l e r G r e g o r y P e t t i s R o n R o b e r t s B r e n d a S a l a s 3 . P U B L I C C O M M E N T S T h e r e w e r e n o r e q u e s t s t o s p e a k f r o m t h e p u b l i c . 4 . A P P R O V A L O F M I N U T E S - ' F e b r u a r y 2 6 , 2 0 0 7 M / S / C ( H o h e n s t e i n / G a r c i a ) t o a p p r o v e t h e m i n u t e s F e b r u a r y 2 6 , 2 0 0 7 a s - s u b m i t t e d . A b s t a i n C r a t o n 5 . A D D I T I O N S / R E V I S I O N S T h e r e w e r e n o a d d i t i o n s o r r e v i s i o n s t o t h e . a g e n d a . o f Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes February 26, 2007 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be !; approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. M/S/C (Hohenstein/Stone) to approve the following Consent Calendar items: 6A. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT 1) Receive and file the Interfund Loan Activity Report for the second quarter ended December 31, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 6B SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the second quarter ended December 3.1, 2006; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 6C. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS " 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the second quarter ended December 31 2006; and 2) Forward to the Cornmission for final action. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT 1) Receive and ;file the Quarterly Investment ; Report .for the quarter. ended December 31, 2006; and .2) Forward to the Commission for final action. AWARD` OF AMENDMENT NO. 2, AGREEMENT NO. 02-31-009-02 WITH SC ENGINEERING TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO STATE: ROUTE 91, FROM ADAMS STREET TO THE 60/91 /215 INTERCHANGE Marlin Feenstra, Program Manager, provided ::background information as to the . need. for the amendment with SC Engineering to provide additional engineering and environmental studies. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes February 26, 2007 Page 3 M/SIC (Tavaglione/Craton) to: 1) Approve the award of Amendment No. 2, Agreement No.02-31-009-02 with SC Engineering to provide additional engineering and environmental studies required to finalize the Project Report, Environmental Document and Geometric Approval Drawings for the proposed improvements to SR-91, from Adams Street to the 60/91/215 Interchange, for a total amendment amount of $280,977; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, execute the agreement .on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. UPDATE ON . PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO 4, AGREEMENT NO. 02-31-043-04 TO CH2M HILL FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF A PROJECT REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FOR THE STATE ROUTE 79 REALIGNMENT PROJECT Cathy Bechtel, Project Delivery Director, updated the Committee on the SR-79 realignment project and amendment withCH2MHill.;: MIS/C (Stone/Tavaglione) to: 1) Receive an update on proposed Amendment No. 4, Agreement No. _02-31-043-04 to CH2M Hill for the realignment of SR-79 in the vicinity of the cities of San Jacinto and 'Hemet for the development of a project report and environmental document. (PR/ED). Staff is currently negotiating the final scope of work, schedule and cost for this amendment. This information will be included with the full agenda packet for the March 14, 2007 Commission meeting for review and approval; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 9. FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 TDA AND MEASURE A AUDIT RESULTS Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager, provided . an overview of the results of the FY 200.5/06 TDA and Measure A recipient audits. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes February 26, 2007 Page 4 M/S/C (Tavaglione/Stone) to: 1) Receive and file the Transportation Development Act ITDA) and Measure A audit results report for the Fiscal Year 2005/06; and 2) forward to the Commission for final action. 10. PROPOSED POLICY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 BUDGET Michele -'Cisneros presented the Commission's policy goals and objectives, highlighting the updates in the areas of mobility initiatives and environmental stewardship. She also provided the calendar of events for the budget process. In response to Commissioner Hank Hohenstein's request for clarification on the plan for the Commission's role in the post-2009 Transportation Uniform Mitigation. Fee (TUMF) project delivery, Shirley Medina,Program ;Manager, replied that it is TUMF project delivery after 2009 and no other implications. Commissioner Mary Craton commended staff for its work on the comprehensive fist of objectives. In response to Commissioner Roger Berg's suggestion regarding public outreach for future projects, specifically the proposed high occupancy toll (HOT) lanes, Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, noted that public outreach will be specifically addressed in the related department narrative in :the budget. Cathy Bechtel added that as it specifically relates to HOT lanes, a. community outreach component is being included in the request for proposals. • M/S/C (Hohenstein/Craton) to: 1) Approve the proposed Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget; and 2) Forward to the Commission for .final action.. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes February 26, 2007 Page 5 11. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR THE CITIES OF MORENO VALLEY AND SAN JACINTO Jerry Rivera, Program Manager, presented the requests frorn the cities of Moreno Valley and San Jacinto for project extensions to their SB 821 bicycle and pedestrian programs. M/S/C (Tavaglione/Stone) to: 1) Grant the city of Moreno Valley an extension to June 30,2008 to complete the Pan Am Boulevard and Graham Street sidewalk improvement projects; 2) Grant the city of San Jacinto an extension to June 30 2008to complete the Idyllwild Drive sidewalk improvement project; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 12. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director, briefed the. Comrnittee on the upcoming trips to Washington D.C. by various interest groups, meetings with Congressman Ken Calvert's transportation staff, the Women's Transportation Seminar (WTS) event held for Congresswoman Mary Bono, and the calendar of events with the California Transportation Commission (CTC) related to the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CM1A) project allocations. ' She then provided an overview of AB 1240 (Benoit), for design/build contracting for the Perris Valley Line (PVL) and AB 1295 (Spitzer), a spot' billintended to be used as a vehicle to obtain legislative g� approval to allow staff to move' forward with HOT lanes on SR-91 and 1-15. M/S/C (Tavaglione/Berg) to: 1) Receive and file the state and federal legislative update; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 13. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR No items were pulled from the consent calendar for discussion. 14. COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS/STAFF There were no Commissioner or staff. reports. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes February 26, 2007 Page 6 15. ADJOURNMENT Thee" a being no further business for consideration by the Budget and Implementation Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:01 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board AGEND ITEM 7A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission . FROM: Shirley Medina, 'Program Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Quarterly Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Transportation Uniform Mitigation: Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial Program Quarterly Report; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2004, the Commission approved 24 projects for the Western County TUMF Regional Arterial Program and programmed fundingfor 23 projects totaling $71.3 million. Project sponsors are required to enter into formal agreements with the Commission for each individual project outlining the work to be performed by phase and funding amount. To date, 21 agreements have been executed totaling $51.169 million. One agreement is currently being processed and the last remaining agreement - is planned :to be initiated in FY 2007/08 Attachment 1 illustrates the projects that are under agreement. The table below identifies the amount of funding programmed per phase for those projects with executed agreements: Project Phase Funding PA&ED - Environmental $ 9.809 million PS&E — Design $ 10.055 million Right of Way $ 14.769 million Construction $ 16.536 million Total $ 51.169 million For FY 2006/07 total invoices received and paid to local agencies amounted to $5.298 million. Agenda item 7A Construction of the TUMF Regional Arterial Program projects is well underway with the city of San " Jacinto's Ramona Expressway project, the first to go to construction in February 2007. Estimated construction schedules are included in Attachment 2. Commission staff is actively monitoring the status of each project and will continue to report on the progress of the TUMF Regional Arterial Program on a quarterly' basis. Attachments: 1) RCTC Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Regional Arterial Program Progress Report June 12, 2007 2) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Regional Arterials ` Construction Schedule Agenda Item 7A 2 " " A T T A C H M E N T 1 T U M F R E G I O N A L A R T E R I A L P R O G R A M P R O G R E S S R E P O R T J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 0 7 P r o j e c t s P r o g r a m m e d 2 3 A g r e e m e n t s S i g n e d 2 1 A g e e m e n t s I n P r o c e s s t A g e n c y P r o j e c t L i m i t s A g r e e m e n t N u m b e r A g r e e m e n t D a t e P r o j e c t N u m b e r P r o g r a m m e d A m o u n t . A g r e e m e n t A m o u n t ( 2 ) P h a s e ( 4 ) A G R E E M E N T S S I G N E D 2 1 C o r o n a G r e e n R i v e r R o a d D o m i n g u e z R a n c h R d t o S R 9 1 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 3 9 1 1 / 2 / 2 0 0 5 5 1 0 3 $ 4 . 2 4 2 $ 0 . 2 0 0 1 $ 0 . 6 0 0 2 $ 3 . 4 4 2 4 C o r o n a F o o t h i l l P a r k w a y L i n c o l n t o G r e e n R i v e r 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 4 0 1 1 / 2 / 2 0 0 5 5 1 0 2 $ 2 . 0 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 0 2 $ 2 . 0 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 0 3 C o r o n a E l C e r r i t o B e d f o r d C y n R d t o 1 - 1 5 N . B . 0 7 - 7 2 - 0 9 8 5 / 9 / 2 0 0 7 5 1 0 1 $ 0 . 1 2 0 $ 1 . 0 0 0 4 C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e B u n d y C y n / S c o t t R d 1 - 1 5 t o t - 1 2 1 5 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 2 4 1 2 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 5 5 1 0 9 $ 0 . 7 1 2 $ 0 . 7 1 2 1 C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e E a s t e r n B y p a s s A u l d R d t o 1 - 1 5 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 2 5 1 / 2 4 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 1 0 $ 3 . 0 0 0 $ 3 . 0 0 0 1 C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e E a s t e r n B y p a s s I . C . @ 1 - 1 5 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 2 3 1 / 2 4 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 1 1 $ 2 . 0 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 0 1 C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e S c h l e i s m a n R d I . 0 @ 1 - 1 5 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 2 2 1 2 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 5 5 1 1 3 $ 0 . 7 5 0 $ 0 . 7 5 0 1 $ 2 . 0 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 0 2 C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e S R 7 9 T h o m p s o n t o D o m e n i g o n i 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 2 1 3 / 1 4 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 1 4 $ 1 . 0 0 0 $ 1 . 0 0 0 : 1 $ 1 . 0 0 0 $ 1 . 0 0 0 2 C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e V a n B u r e n B l v d W a s h i n g t o n t o W o o d 0 6 - 7 2 - 0 4 7 7 / 3 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 1 6 - $ 0 . 2 7 5 ' . $ 0 . 2 7 5 1 $ 0 . 6 1 2 $ 0 . 6 8 8 2 C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e V a n B u r e n B l v d C l a y t o 1 2 0 0 ' S . o f S a n t a A n a R i v e r 0 6 - 7 2 - 0 7 0 5 1 1 5 $ 4 . 8 6 0 $ 5 . 2 2 0 ' 4 C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e R e c h e C y n / R e c h e V i s t a H e a c o c k t o S . B C o L i n e 0 7 - 7 2 - 0 6 8 5 / 7 / 2 0 0 7 5 1 0 7 $ 0 . 4 0 9 $ 0 . 4 0 9 1 M o r e n o V a l l e y P e r r i s B l v d R a m o n a E x p r e s s w a y t o C a c t u s 0 6 - 7 2 - 0 4 0 9 / 1 5 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 0 6 $ 0 . 3 8 9 - . $ 0 . 3 8 9 1 $ 0 . 8 7 1 $ 0 . 8 7 1 2 M o r e n o V a l l e y P e r r i s B l v d i r o n w o o d t o M a n z a n i t a 0 6 - 7 2 - 0 4 1 9 / 1 5 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 0 5 $ 0 . 1 3 4 . $ 0 : 1 3 4 ` 1 $ 0 . 3 3 6 $ 0 . 3 3 6 2 R i v e r s i d e V a n B u r e n B l v d I . C . @ S R 9 1 0 6 - 7 2 - 0 3 6 4 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 0 8 $ 2 . 0 0 0 ' $ 2 . 0 0 0 3 R i v e r s i d e V a n B u r e n B l v d A n d r e w t o G a r f i e l d . 0 6 - 7 2 - 0 1 3 5 / 4 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 2 2 $ 0 . 9 0 5 $ 2 . 3 2 9 4 R i v e r s i d e V a n B u r e n B l v d S a n t a A n a R i v e r t o J a c k s o n 0 6 - 7 2 - 0 5 0 6 / 1 9 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 2 5 $ 0 . 8 4 5 $ 0 . 8 4 5 4 S a n J a c i n t o R a m o n a E x p r e s s w a y S a n d e r s o n t o W i l y C i t y L i m i t s 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 4 9 1 0 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 5 5 1 1 7 $ 0 . 0 4 0 $ 0 . 0 4 0 1 $ 0 . 1 6 0 $ 0 . 1 6 0 2 $ 3 . 0 0 0 $ 3 . 7 0 0 4 S a n J a c i n t o R a m o n a E x p r e s s w a y S e v e n t h t o C e d a r 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 2 0 1 0 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 5 5 1 1 8 $ 0 . 2 0 0 $ 0 . 2 0 0 1 $ 0 . 3 0 0 $ 0 . 3 0 0 2 $ 0 . 9 0 0 $ 0 . 9 0 0 3 T e m e c u l a W e s t e r n B y p a s s A l i g n . 1 - 1 5 t o S R 7 9 S o u t h I . C . 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 4 2 1 / 1 1 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 2 1 $ 0 . 7 0 0 $ 0 . 7 0 0 1 T e m e c u l a " . - S R 7 9 S o u t h . - _ _ : : L C . @ 1 - 1 5 . : _ : _ - . . - 0 6 - 7 2 - 5 0 6 6 / 2 4 / 2 0 0 5 " 5 1 2 0 $ 0 . 1 0 0 $ 0 . 1 0 0 2 $ 4 . 0 0 0 $ 4 . 3 5 2 3 T e m e c u l a F r e n c h V a l l e y P k w y I . 0 @ I - 1 5 0 6 - 7 2 - 0 4 8 6 / 2 / 2 0 0 6 5 1 1 9 $ 7 . 0 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 0 2 $ 5 . 5 1 7 3 T o t a l S i g n e d A g r e e m e n t s P A & E D $ 9 . 8 0 9 P S & E $ 1 0 . 0 5 5 R / W , $ 1 4 . 7 6 9 C O N S T $ 1 6 . 5 3 6 T O T A L $ 5 1 . 1 6 9 A G R E E M E N T S I N P R O C E S S 1 C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e P o t r e r o B l v d S a n T i m o t e o C y n R d t o S r 7 9 5 1 1 2 $ 2 . 0 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 0 : 2 T o t a l A g r e e m e n t s I n P r o c e s s P A & E D $ 0 . 0 0 0 P S & E $ 2 . 0 0 0 R A N C O N S T $ 0 . 0 0 0 T O T A L . 1 $ 2 . 0 0 0 ! . A G R E E M E N T S T O B E S T A R T E D _ 1 L a k e E l s i n o r e R a i l r o a d C y n R d 1 - 1 5 t o C a n y o n H i l l s R d 5 1 0 4 $ 0 . 3 0 0 2 T o t a l A g r e e m e n t s T o B e S t a r t e d $ 0 . 3 0 0 R C T C P R O J E C T S R C T C M i d C o u n t y P a r k w a y S R 7 9 t o 1 - 1 5 2 3 0 2 $ 6 . 6 5 0 1 R C T C S R 7 9 R e a l i g n m e n t G i l m a n S p r i n g s t o D o m e n i g o n i 3 0 0 3 $ 1 3 . 1 5 9 1 R C T C M C P / S R 7 9 5 1 2 3 $ 2 5 . 0 0 0 3 R C T C G r e e n R i v e r R d I n t e r c h a n g e @ S R 9 1 5 1 2 4 $ 3 . 1 4 5 4 T o t a l R C T C P r o j e c t s $ 4 7 . 9 5 4 1 . ) P h a s e s : P h a s e 1 ( P A & E D ) ; P h a s e 2 ( P S & E ) ; P h a s e 3 ( R / W ) ; P h a s e 4 ( C o n s t r u c t i o n ) 2 . " ) W h e r e t h e a g r e e m e n t a m o u n t i s h i g h e r t h a n p r o g r a m m e d a m o u n t f o r P h a s e s 1 , 2 o r 3 , i t i s d u e t o a n u p d a t e o f t h e N e x u s S t u d y . H i g h e r a m o u n t s f o r P h a s e 4 m a y a l s o b e d u e t o i n c l u s i o n o f a 1 0 % c o n t i n g e n c y i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e N e x u s S t u d y b u t n o t n o t p r e v i o u s l y p r o g r a m m e d . p b 6 / 1 2 / 0 7 TUMF REGIONAL ARTERIALS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ATTACHMENT 2 Agency San Jacinto Corona Riverside Riverside Corona Project Ramona Expressway El Cerrito Van Buren Blvd Van Buren Blvd Green River Road Limits Sanderson to INly City Limits Bedford Cyn Rd to I-15 N.B. Andrew to Garfield I.C. @SR 91 Dominguez_ Ranch Rd to SR 91 Project Number CONSTRUCTION START FISCAL YR.. . 5117 2007 5101 2007 5122 2007 5108 2008 5103 2008 'CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE* County of Riverside County of Riverside SR 79 Van Buren. Blvd Thompson to D.omenigoni Washington to Wood 5114 2008 5116 2008 County of Riverside Van Buren Blvd Clay to 1200' S. of Santa Ana River. 5115 2008 Riverside Van Buren Blvd Santa Ana River to Jackson 5125 2008 San Jacinto Corona County of Riverside Moreno Valley Temecula County of Riverside Temecula County of Riverside Lake Elsinore County of Riverside Moreno .Valle Coun of Riverside Temecula County of Riverside *TBD - Date cannot ** Completion dates pb 6/14/07 Ramona Ex o resswa Foothill Parkway Bundy.Cyn/ Scott Rd. Perris Blvd SR 79 South Eastern Bypass French Valley Pkwy Potrero Blvd Railroad C n Rd Seventh to Cedar Lincoln to Green River 1-15 to I-1215 Ironwood to Manzanita I.0 1-15 Auld Rd to 1-15 I.0 @ 1-15 5118. 2008 _ 5102 2009. 5109 2009 5105 2009 5120 2009. San Timoteo Cyn Rd to Sr 79 1-15 to Can on Hills Rd Schleisman Rd I.0 @ 1-15 Perris Blvd Eastern B sass 5110 2010 5119 2010 5112 2010 5104 2010 Ramona Ex • resswa to Cactus I.C. • 1-15 5113. 2011 5106 2011 Western Bypass Align: 1-15 to SR 79 South I.C. Re,che Cyn/Reche Vista Heacock to S.B Co Line 5111 2012 5121 TBD* 5107 TBD* be determined until significant environmental impacts have been addressed. are shown for projects currently under construction. 7/07 10/07 2/08 • " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 7 T O : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e F R O M : S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t y D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e P r o g r a m m i n g R e q u e s t f o r S t a t e R o u t e 7 9 , ` T h o m p s o n R o a d t o D o m e n i g o n i P a r k w a y P r o j e c t P h a s e S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N . T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e t h e c o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e ' s ( C o u n t y ) r e q u e s t t o p r o g r a m $ 4 m i l l i o n o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e ( T U M F ) R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l f u n d s o n t h e S R - 7 9 , T h o m p s o n R o a d t o D o m e n i g o n i P a r k w a y , , w i d e n i n g p r o j e c t f o r P h a s e 1 c o n s t r u c t i o n f r o m T h o m p s o n R o a d t o W h i s p e r i n g H e i g h t s P a r k w a y ; a n d ` = F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : T h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s T U M F R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l P r o g r a m i n c l u d e s 2 4 p r o j e c t s w i t h $ 5 9 . 3 2 1 p r o g r a m m e d o v e r a . f i v e - y e a r s p a n f r o m F Y s ; 2 0 0 5 / 0 6 _ t h r o u g h 2 0 0 9 . / 1 0 . I t w a s t h e i n t e n t o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o p r o g r a m t h e m a j o r i t y o f f u n d s f o r p r e - c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e s t o k e e p t h e p r o g r a m o n a f i r s t c o m e , f i r s t s e r v e b a s i s a s p r o j e c t s b e c o m e r e a d y f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n . T h e C o u n t y p r o j e c t o n S R - 7 9 , T h o m p s o n t o D o m e n i g o n i P a r k w a y , w i d e n i n g p r o j e c t w a s i n c l u d e d i n t h e a p p r o v e d p r o g r a m . T h e C o u n t y i s r e q u e s t i n g t h e p r o g r a m m i n g o f c o n s t r u c t i o n f u n d s f o r P h a s e 1 o f t h e S R - 7 9 w i d e n i n g p r o j e c t , w h i c h t h e l i m i t s a r e f r o m T h o m p s o n - R o a d t o W h i s p e r i n g H e i g h t s P a r k w a y . T h e a m o u n t i d e n t i f i e d f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n . i n t h e o r i g i n a l n o m i n a t i o n f r o m T h o m p s o n R o a d t o D o m e n i g o n i P a r k w a y w a s $ 1 3 m i l l i o n , n o t i n c l u d i n g . i n c r e a s e s t h a t w o u l d r e s u l t f r o m C o n s u m e r C o s t I n d e x ( C C I ) a n d N e x u s S t u d y u p d a t e s . T h e C o u n t y i s r e q u e s t i n g $ 4 m i l l i o n t o b e p r o g r a m m e d f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e o f t h e P h a s e I . p r o j e c t . a n d w i l l r e q u e s t p r o g r a m m i n g t h e a d d i t i o n a l c o n s t r u c t i o n f u n d s f o r P h a s e I I , W h i s p e r i n g H e i g h t s P a r k w a y t o D o m e n i g o n i . P a r k w a y , a t a l a t e r d a t e . A g e n d a I t e m 8 Staff recommends approval of the County's request, as it is consistent with the original program request and Nexus study. The SR-79 Phase I widening project is anticipated to'start this fall. Financial Information to Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: $4,000,000 Source of Funds: TUMF Regional Arterial Budget Adjustment: Yes GLA.No.: 210 72 81301 P51 14 Fiscal Procedures_ Approved: ji,,i Date: 6/25/07 Agenda item 8 6 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 7 T O : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e F R O M : S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t y D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n P r o g r a m m i n g . R e q u e s t f o r A d d i t i o n a l F u n d i n g f o r V a n B u r e n B o u l e v a r d i n t e r c h a n g e a t S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 R i g h t - o f - W a y P h a s e F e e t h e . S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e t h e c i t y o f R i v e r s i d e ' s ( C i t y ) r e q u e s t t o i n c r e a s e t h e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e ( T U M F ) R e g i o n a l ; A r t e r i a l f u n d s f o r r i g h t - o f - w a y o n t h e S R - 9 1 / V a n B u r e n B o u l e v a r d i n t e r c h a n g e p r o j e c t f r o m $ 2 m i l l i o n t o $ 8 m i l l i o n ; . 2 ) - - A p p r o v e a n i n c r e a s e - f o r ` e x p e n d i t u r e s o f $ 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 - i n t h e F Y 2 0 0 7 / 0 8 b u d g e t ; 3 ) A m e n d t h e T U M F a g r e e m e n t ; a n d 4 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : . T h e C o m m i s s i o n c u r r e n t l y h a s a n a g r e e m e n t w i t h t h e c i t y o f R i v e r s i d e t o p r o v i d e $ 2 m i l l i o n i n T U M F R e g i o n a l A r t e r i a l P r o g r a m f u n d s f o r t h e S R - 9 1 / V a n B u r e n i n t e r c h a n g e r i g h t - o f - w a y p h a s e . A n a d d i t i o n a l $ 8 - m i l l i o n w a s a p p r o v e d , b u t n o t p r o g r a m m e d f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n . T h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d t h e m a j o r i t y o f T U M F p r o g r a m m i n g f o r p r e - c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s w i t h a f i r s t c o m e , f i r s t s e r v e r e q u i r e m e n t f o r a g e n c i e s t o r e q u e s t c o n s t r u c t i o n p r o g r a m m i n g w h e n p r o j e c t s a r e t o b e g i n c o n s t r u c t i o n . T h e c o s t o f r i g h t - o f - w a y f o r t h i s p r o j e c t h a s i n c r e a s e d s i g n i f i c a n t l y a n d t h e C i t y i s r e q u e s t i n g t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o i n c r e a s e t h e a m o u n t o f T U M F : f u n d i n g f o r t h e r i g h t - o f - w a y p h a s e f r o m $ 2 m i l l i o n t o $ 8 m i l l i o n . T h e , a m o u n t . i d e n t i f i e d . i n t h e o r i g i n a l r e q u e s t f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e i s $ 8 m i l l i o n . T h e r e f o r e , t h i s r e q u e s t i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e o r i g i n a l a p p r o v a l a n d d o e s n o t i n c r e a s e f u n d i n g f o r t h e p r o j e c t a s i t m o v e s f u n d i n g f r o m . t h e . c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e t o t h e r i g h t - o f - w a y p h a s e . A g e n d a I t e m 9 The City will be required to use additional local and/or other funds for the construction phase. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: $6,000,000 Source of Funds: -TUMF Regional Arterial Budget Adjustment: Yes GLA No.: 210 72 81401 P5108 Fiscal Procedures. Approved: . ,14.,,, Date: 6/25/07 Agenda Item 9 8 AGENDA ITEM 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2008-1.2 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item isfor the Committee to: 1) Approve the FY 2008-12 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement` Plans (CIPs) for Local Streets and Roads as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Measure'A Ordinance requires each recipient of local: SfreetS and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive its Measure A disbursements. In addition, the cities ,in the Coachella Valley and the County (representing the unincorporated area of the Coachella Valley) must be participating in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation- Fee (TUMF) -program. The agencies are required to submit the annual certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. On April 20, 2007, Commission staff provided the local agencies with Measure A revenue projections for Focal streets and roads to assist them in preparation of the required Five -Year CIP. The agencies were asked to submit their CIPs by June 11, 2007 for submission to the Budget and Implementation Committee at its June 25, 2007 meeting and to the Commission on July 11, 2007. Agenda Item 10 To date, we have received the required CIPs, MOE certification and supporting documentation from the following local agencies in the county: Western County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Banning Coachella Blythe Canyon Lake Indian Wells Riverside County Corona Indio Hemet Palm Desert Moreno Valley Palm Springs Perris Rancho Mirage Riverside County Riverside County San Jacinto Temecula The eight cities that have not submitted all of the required documents include: Beaumont, Calimesa, Cathedral City, Desert Hot Springs, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Norco and Riverside. Commission staff :has informed city staff that no disbursement, of Measure A funds for local streets and roads will be made until all of the required documents are received and approved by_the -Commission. The city of La Quinta does not receive Measure A funds because it does not participate in CVAG's TUMF program. The CIPs received are ,posted on the Budget and Implementation Committee agenda on the Commission's website and are on file at the Commission offices. Agenda Item 10 10 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N / D A T E : J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 7 T O : - B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e F R O M : J e r r y R i v e r a , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : A n n e M a y e r , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T ; F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 7 - 1 1 M e a s u r e A F i v e - Y e a r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n f o r L o c a l S t r e e t s a n d R o a d s f o r t h e C i t y o f ; C o a c h e l l a S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y 2 0 0 7 - 1 1 M e a s u r e A F i v e - Y e a r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ( C I P ) f o r l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s f o r t h e c i t y o f C o a c h e l l a a s s u b m i t t e d ; a n d 2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : - T h e M e a s u r e A O r d i n a n c e r e q u i r e s e a c h r e c i p i e n t o f s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s m o n i e s t o a n n u a l l y p r o v i d e t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a f i v e - y e a r p l a n o n h o w t h o s e f u n d s a r e t o b e e x p e n d e d i n o r d e r t o r e c e i v e i t s M e a s u r e A d i s b u r s e m e n t s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e c i t i e s . i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y a n d t h e C o u n t y ( r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e u n i n c o r p o r a t e d a r e a o f t h e E a s t e r n . C o u n t y ) m u s t b e p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n C V A G ' s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n ' F e e ( T U M F ) p r o g r a m . T h e a g e n c i e s a r e r e q u i r e d t o s u b m i t t h e a n n u a l c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f M a i n t e n a n c e o f E f f o r t ( M O E ) a l o n g w i t h d o c u m e n t a t i o n s u p p o r t i n g t h e c a l c u l a t i o n . O n A p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 0 6 , C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f p r o v i d e d t h e l o c a l a g e n c i e s w i t h M e a s u r e A r e v e n u e p r o j e c t i o n s f o r l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s t o a s s i s t t h e m i n p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h e r e q u i r e d F i v e - Y e a r C I P f o r F Y 2 0 0 7 - 1 1 . T h e a g e n c i e s w e r e a s k e d t o s u b m i t t h e i r C I P s b y J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 0 6 , f o r s u b m i s s i o n t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n o n J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 0 6 . T h e r e q u i r e d F i v e - Y e a r C I P , M O E c e r t i f i c a t i o n a n d s u p p o r t i n g d o c u m e n t a t i o n w a s r e c e n t l y r e c e i v e d f r o m t h e c i t y o f C o a c h e l l a . A t t a c h m e n t : M e a s u r e A C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n f o r C i t y o f C o a c h e l l a A g e n d a I t e m 1 1 1 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2006-2007. Agency: City of Coachella Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: H. Frank Crain. Phone#: 760-200-6509 ITEM No: PROJECT NAME LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNS ($000'S)' 1 Avenue 51 Harrison St. TO Mecca St. Reconstruct $119 $96 2 Fifth St. Grapefruit to 7th St. Reconstruct $85 $62 3 Napoli Lane Genoa St. to West end , Overlay $61 $38 4 Sylmar lane - Genoa St. to West end 'Overlay $fit $38 5 Vineta Lane Genoa St. toWest end Overlay. $61 $38 6 Nile Lane Genoa St. to West end Overlay $61 $38 7 Calle Pera Hill St. to North end Reconstruct $58 $35 8 Genoa St. • Ave. 52 to Bagdad St. Overlay $132 $109 9 Hill St Grapefruit Blv. to Genoa St. Reconstruct $129 $106 ; 10 Camino Corto Calle Limon to North end Reconstruct $57 $33 11 Calle Limon Genoa St. to Ave. 52 Reconstruct $115 .$91 12 Tyler St. Ave. 52 to North of Calle Mendoza Reconstruct $1,021 $1,002_ 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year ' 2007/08 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Funding Recommendations STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the FY .2007/08 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program recommended funding as shown on the attached- schedule, and 2) ' Forward to the Cormission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In April 2007, Commission staff notified the cities, the county and local school districts that an estimated $1,491,200 would be available for programming in FY 2007/08 through the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program. This program is funded by an allocation of 2% of the total Local Transportation 'Fund (LTF) Funds apportioned .to Riverside County by the state and funds carried over from prior years. Carryover funds available this year totaled $100,500 from previously approved projects which either did not expend their full allocations due to lower than estimated actual costs or were subsequently abandoned by the applicants . for various reasons. Total available funds for FY 2007/08 are $1,591,765. The SB 821 proposals were due May 25, 2007. The Commission received 40 proposals (3.3 sidewalk projects, 5 ADA related retrofit project, and 2 pedestrian/trail bridge projects) from 17 agencies requesting a total of $3,807,696 in funding (Attachment 1). An evaluation committee comprised of three members from the Commission's Citizens Advisory Committee and three members from the Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the proposals on June 12, 2007. All of the applicants were invited to the meeting and requested to present their proposals to the committee and answer questions from the members. Agenda Item 12 13 The proposals were evaluated and ranked based upon the Commission adopted scoring criteria (Attachment 2). Sixteen projects are recommendedfor fundingas indicated on Attachment 3. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes No Year: FY 2007/08 FY 2007/08 Amount: $1,491,200 $ 104,565 Source of Funds: LTF Budget Adjustment: No Yes GLA No.: 601 62 86106 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \1414.4 34,,vz, Date: 6/25/07 Attachments: 1) SB 821 Program Submittals FY 2007/08 2) SB 821 Evaluation Criteria 3) SB 821 FY 2007/08 Recommended Funding Agenda Item 12 14 " " A T T A C H M E N T 1 R C T C S B . 8 2 1 P R O G R A M S U B M I T T A L S F Y 2 0 0 7 - 0 8 T o t a l S B 8 2 1 F u n d s L o c a l A g e n c y / P r o j e c t C o s t R e q u e s t e d = M a t c h B a n n i n g ( 6 ) H e m m e r l i n g E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l S i d e w a l k $ 5 2 , 0 0 0 $ 3 9 , 0 0 0 ; . $ 1 3 , 0 0 0 L i o n s P a r k S i d e w a l k 7 8 , 0 0 0 5 8 , 5 0 0 1 9 , 5 0 0 R o o s e v e l t W i l l a m s P a r k , G e o r g e S t . S i d e w a l k 5 4 , 0 0 0 4 0 , 5 0 0 1 3 , 5 0 0 1 N i l l a m s S t . S i d e w a l k 1 2 4 , 0 0 0 9 3 , 0 0 0 3 1 , 0 0 0 W o o d l a n d A v e . S i d e w a l k 6 2 , 0 0 0 4 6 , 5 0 0 1 5 , 5 0 0 C h r i s t i e S t . S i d e w a l k 4 0 , 0 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 T o t a l $ 4 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 7 , 5 0 0 $ 1 0 2 , 5 0 0 B e a u m o n t . C i t y w i d e S i d e w a l k s & A c c e s s R a m p s B l y t h e ( 4 ) D e k e m a S t . S i d e w a l k B a r n a r d S t . S i d e w a l k _ . . C h a n s l o r w a y & S o l a n o A v e . S i d e w a l k S o l a n o A v e . S i d e w a l k T o t a l $ 2 1 3 , 7 5 0 $ 9 8 , 5 0 0 $ 1 1 5 , 2 5 0 $ 1 3 9 , 4 0 5 $ 1 1 1 , 5 2 4 $ 2 1 , 8 8 1 1 . 1 5 , 7 9 9 . 9 2 , 6 3 9 2 3 , 1 6 0 9 7 , 3 6 3 7 7 , 8 9 0 1 9 , 4 7 3 5 1 , 3 6 9 4 1 ; 0 9 5 1 0 , 2 7 4 $ 4 0 3 , 9 3 6 $ 3 2 3 , 1 4 8 $ 8 0 , 7 8 8 C a t h e d r a l : C i t y S k y B l u e W a t e r T r a i l S i d e w a l k i m p r o v e . P r o j e c t $ 2 1 3 , 0 0 0 - $ 1 0 6 , 5 0 0 $ 1 0 6 , 5 0 0 C o r o n a T a b e r R o a d / S t a t e S t . S i d e w a l k I m p r o v e m e n t s D e s e r t H o t S p r i n g s T w o B u n c h P a l m s T r a i l S i d e w a l k H e m e t C i t y w i d e S i d e w a l k & A c c e s s R a m p P r o j e c t " I n d i o C e n t r a l B u s i n e s s D i s t r i c t S i d e w a l k & A c c e s s R a m p 1 5 $ 1 4 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 6 , 5 0 0 $ 3 5 , 5 0 0 $ 2 6 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 9 5 , 0 0 0 , $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 $ 9 5 , 0 0 0 $ 9 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 7 , 0 0 0 $ 4 8 , 4 5 0 $ 8 , 5 5 0 RCTC SB 821 PROGRAM SUBMITTALS FY 2007-08 Agency / Project La Quinta Coachella Canal Multi -use Trail Bridge Lake Elsinore (3) Lewis: St. Sidewalk Silver St. Sidewalk Mill St. Sidewalk Total Moreno Valley (2) Iris Ave. Sidewalk -Indian St./Perris 'Blvd. Ironwood Ave Sidewalk - Heacock St./Perris Blvd. Total Palm Springs Farrell 'Drive Sidewalk Project Perris Indian Ave. Sidewalk_ Riverside (6) Bingham Ave. Sidewalk $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 Orchard St. Sidewalk 280,000 140,000 140,000 Picker St. Sidewalk 320,000 160,000 160,000 Randolph St. & Lake St. Sidewalk s 300,000 150,000 150,000 Dorset Dr:, Layton Court & Wallingham Dr. Sidewalk 170,000 85,000. 85,000 Wheelchair Ramps 250,000 125,000 125,000 Total $1,520,000 $760,000 $760,000 ATTACHMENT 1 Total SB 821 Funds -Local Cost Requested Match $228,750 $114,375 $114,375 $44,000 $22,000 $22,000 17,000 8,500 8,500 114,550 57,275 57;275 $175,550 $87,775 $87,775 $138,180 $69,090 $69,090 245.016 122, 508 122, 508 $383,196 $191,598 $191,598 16 " R C T C S B 8 2 1 P R O G R A M S U B M I T T A L S F Y 2 0 0 7 - 0 8 A T T A C H M E N T 1 T o t a l S B 8 2 1 F u n d s L o c a l A g e n c y / P r o j e c t C o s t R e q u e s t e d M a t c h R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ( 8 ) A c a c i a A v e . S i d e w a l k $ 1 0 6 , 6 0 0 $ 8 5 , 3 0 0 $ 2 1 , 3 0 0 A n t e l o p e R o a d S i d e w a l k 8 4 , 3 0 0 6 7 , 4 0 0 1 6 , 9 0 0 J u r u p a ' R o a d S i d e w a l k 1 7 1 , 9 0 0 1 3 7 , 5 0 0 3 4 , 4 0 0 M a y b e r r y A v e . S i d e w a l k - D a r t m o u t h t o S t a n f o r d 1 3 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 4 8 0 0 2 6 , 2 0 0 M a y b e r r y A v e . S i d e w a l k - P e a r t r e e t o V a l l e V i s t a 2 6 5 , 8 0 0 2 1 2 , 6 0 0 5 3 , 2 0 0 M a y b e r r y A v e . S i d e w a l k - B a u t i s t a C r e e k B r i d g e 2 6 9 , 5 0 0 2 1 5 , 6 0 0 5 3 , 9 0 0 S t e v e A v e . S i d e w a l k 9 4 , 4 0 0 7 5 , 5 0 0 1 8 , 9 0 0 W a s h i n g t o n S t . S i d e w a l k 1 0 2 , 0 0 0 8 1 , 6 0 0 2 0 , 4 0 0 . T o t a l $ 1 , 2 2 5 , 5 0 0 $ 9 8 0 , 3 0 0 $ 2 4 5 , 2 0 0 S a n : J a c i n t o R a n c h o S a n J a c i n t o S i d e w a l k & R a m p P r o j e c t $ 1 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 8 2 , 5 0 0 $ 8 2 , 5 0 0 T e m e c u l a . , S a n t a G e r t r u d i s P e d . / B i c y c l e B r i d g e G r a n d T o t a l s - 1 7 A g e n c i e s 4 0 P r o j e c t s J R : 6 / 0 4 / 0 7 " T o t a l S B 8 2 1 F u n d s A v a i l a b l e 1 7 $ 8 7 6 , 4 0 8 $ 1 3 2 , 0 0 0 $ 7 4 4 , 4 0 8 $ 6 , 7 8 2 , 6 4 0 $ 3 , 8 0 7 6 9 6 $ 2 , 9 7 4 , 9 4 4 $ 1 , 5 9 1 , 7 6 5 " A T T A C H M E N T 2 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N S B 8 2 1 E V A L U A T I O N C R I T E R I A F A C T O R 1 . U S E T h e e x t e n t o f p o t e n t i a l u s e o f a b i c y c l e o r p e d e s t r i a n f a c i l i t y i s t h e m o s t i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r . E m p h a s i s o f t h i s f a c t o r h e l p s e n s u r e t h e g r e a t e s t b e n e f i t s w i l l b e d e r i v e d f r o m t h e e x p e n d i t u r e o f S B 8 2 1 f u n d s . R e l a t i v e u s a g e i s t o b e d e r i v e d f r o m a n a l y s i s o f t r i p g e n e r a t o r s a n d a t t r a c t o r s a d j a c e n t t o t h e p r o j e c t . S A F E T Y P o i n t s a r e a w a r d e d o n t h e b a s i s o f a p r o j e c t ' s p o t e n t i a l t o c o r r e c t c u r r e n t s a f e t y p r o b l e m s . 3 . I M P O R T A N C E A S A T R A N S P O R T A T I O N A L T E R N A T I V E P o i n t s a r e a w a r d e d o n t h e b a s i s o f a p r o j e c t ' s p o t e n t i a l t o a t t r a c t u s e r s w h o w o u l d o t h e r w i s e u s e a n a u t o m o b i l e . 4 . M I S S I N G L I N K , E X T E N S I O N , O R C O N N E C T I V I T Y P o i n t s a r e - a w a r d e d ' t o p r o j e c t s t h a t l i n k , a r e e x t e n s i o n s o f , o r p o t e n t i a l l y c o n n e c t t o e x i s t i n g f a c i l i t i e s . 5 . M A T C H I N G F U N D S T h i s f a c t o r i s u s e d t o h e l p e n s u r e t h a t t h e r e i s l o c a l f u n d i n g p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n t h e p r o j e c t n o t j u s t a n a p p l i c a t i o n - f o r " f r e e " m o n e y . O n e p o i n t w o u l d b e a w a r d e d f o r e a c h 5 % o f t o t a l p r o j e c t c o s t t h a t i s f i n a n c e d b y t h e l o c a l a g e n c y . 6 . P O P U L A T I O N E Q U I T Y T h e p i f r p o s e o f t h i s f a c t o r i s t o h e l p e n s u r e t h a t o n e a g e n c y d o e s n o t r e c e i v e a l l t h e f u n d s . T h e a p p l i c a n t r e c e i v e s t h e m a x i m u m 1 0 p o i n t s i f t h e a m o u n t o f f u n d s r e q u e s t e d d o e s n o t e x c e e d w h a t t h e a p p l i c a n t w o u l d r e c e i v e i f t h e f u n d s w e r e a l l o c a t e d b y p o p u l a t i o n . Y e a r t o y e a r t o t a l s a r e r e c o r d e d s o t h a t a n a p p l i c a n t c o u l d b u i l d u p a " c r e d i t " . - ( C a l c u l a t e d b y R O T C ) 7 . P H Y S I C A L A C C E S S I B I L I T Y E N H A N C E M E N T T h e p u r p o s e o f t h i s f a c t o r i s t o e n h a n c e t h e p h y s i c a l a c c e s s i b i l i t y o f e x i s t i n g p e d e s t r i a n p r o j e c t s . A p p l i c a n t a g e n c i e s m a y r e c e i v e u p t o 1 0 " b o n u s " p o i n t s f o r t h e i r p r o j e c t p r o p o s a l s w h i c h i m p r o v e t h e p h y s i c a l a c c e s s t o e x i s t i n g f a c i l i t i e s . 1 8 M A X I M U M P O I N T S 2 5 2 0 2 0 1 5 i o 1 0 1 0 B O N U S Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Agency Temecula Riverside Moreno Valley Cathedral City . Corona Riverside Lake Elsinore Hemet Beaumont Banning Lake Elsinore Lake Elsinore Desert Hot Springs San Jacinto Riverside County Riverside County Palm Springs Moreno Valley Riverside Riverside County Riverside Banning Riverside County Riverside County Perris Banning Banning RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FY 2007/08 RECOMMENDED FUNDING Project Description Santa Bertrudis Ped./Bicycle Bridge Wheelchair Ramps Iris Ave. Sidewalk - Indian St:/Perris Blvd. Sky Blue Water Trail Sidewalk Improve. . Taber Road/State St. Sidewalk Bingham Ave. Sidewalk Mill St.Sidewalk Citywide Sidewalk & Access Ramps Citywide Sidewalk & Access Ramps Williams St. Sidewalk Lewis St. Sidewalk Silver St. Sidewalk Two Bunch Palms Trail Sidewalk Rancho San Jacinto Sidewalk & Ramps. Mayberry Ave. S/W-Bautista Creek Bridge Acacia Ave. Sidewalk Farrell Dr. Sidewalk Project Ironwood Ave. Sidewalk - Heacock/Perris Orchard St. Sidewalk Washington St. Sidewalk Randolph St. & Lake St, Sidewalks Lions Park Sidewalk Jurupa Road Sidewalk Mayberry Ave. S/W-Dartmouth/Stanford Indian Ave. Sidewalk Woodland Ave. Sidewalk Hemmerling Elem. School Sidewalk Total Costs $876,408 250,000 138,180 213,000 142,000 200,000 114,550 190,000 213,750 124,000 44,000 17,000 260,000 1.65,000 269,500 106,600 118,550 245,016 280,000 102,000 300,000 78,000 171,900 131,000 200,000 62,000 -- 52,000 - SB 821 Funds Requested, $132,000 125,000 69,090 106,500 106,500 100,000 57,275 95,000 98,500 93,000 22,000 8,500 195,000 82,500 215,600 85,300 88,550 122,508 140,000 81,600 150,000 58,500 137,5.00 104,800 90,000 46,500 39,000 • ATTACHMENT 3 Recommended Cummulative Average Allocation Funds Allocated. Score $132,000 $125,000 $69,090 $106,500 $106,500 $100,000 $57,275 $95,000 $98,500 $93,000 $22,000 $8,500 $195,000 $82,500 $215,600 $85,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0' $0 $132,000 257,000 326,090 432,590 539,090 639,090 696,365 791,365 889,865 982,865 1,004,865 1,013,365 1,208,365 1,290,865 1,506,465 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765_ 1,591,765 , 92.1 90.0 89.2 87.6 85.5 84.6 84.3 84.0 812 83.0 82.5 8L5 81.4 81.2 80.9 80.3 78.2 76.8 76:6 76.5 76,4 75.8 75,5 75.1 75.0 73.4 72.6 Rank Agency 28 Riverside 29 Riverside County 30 Riverside County 31 Riverside County 32 Blythe 33 Riverside 34 Banning 35 Blythe 36 Blythe 37 Blythe 38 Indio 39 Bunning 40 La Quinta Totals RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB - 821 BICYCLEAND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM . FY 2007/08 RECOMMENDED FUNDING • Protect Description Picker St. Sidewalk Antelope Road Sidewalk Mayberry Ave: S/W - Peartree/Valle Vista Steve Ave. Sidewalk Chanslorway & Solano Ave. Sidewalk Dorset Dr./Layton Ct./Wallingham Dr. Roosevelt Williams Park, George St. S/W Dekema St. Sidewalk Solano Ave. Sidewalk Barnard St. Sidewalk Central Bus. District Sidewalk & Ramps Christie St. Sidewalk Coachella Canal Multi -Use Trail Bridge Total SB 821 Funds Costs Requested 320,000 160,000 84,300 67,400 265,800 212,600 94,400 75,500. 97,363. 77,890 170,000 85,000 54,000 40,500 139,405 111,524 51,369 41,095 115,799 92,639 57,000 48,450 40,000 30,000 228,750 114,375 Recommended Allocation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $6,782,640- $3,$07,696, $1,5',1,765 ATTACHMENT 3 Cummulative Funds Allocated 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 1,591,765 Average Score 72.4 71.5 71.3 71.1 70.6 69.8 69.2 69.0 66.0 63.6 59,7 55.8 53.3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Brian Cunanan, Staff Analyst Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement Between the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction 'Review Committee and Riverside County Transportation` Commission to Fund New Freeway Service Patrol Segments STAFF RECOMMENDATION. - This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 07-45-132-00 with the 'Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) for $825,000 to fund two new Freeway. Service Patrol (FSP) beats; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review; to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION. - The Commission, in its capacity as the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies:.:,: (SAFE), currently operates . an FSP program on segments or beats on 1-15, 1-215, SR-60 and SR-91 in Western Riverside County during morning and afternoon commute hours. The FSP program has almost doubled in the "past two years and as of August 2007, will have nine beats with 20 trucks covering over 83 miles of highway. The MSRC released a call for projects whereby the four transportation agencies in its area - Los Angeles County ;Metropolitan Transportation- Authority ('METRO), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), the Commission, and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) - are each eligible to receive funding for new or expanded FSP programs. The MSRC funds must be matched by 25 % local funds and the actual FSP program operations cannot exceed three years. Award value for each SAFE is computed as follows: $700,000 geographic funding minimum for each county SAFE, with the balance of funding distributed using the Statewide Tier 1 formula (50% population, :25% congestion, and 25% urban freeway lane miles). Riverside County was allocated a total of $825,000 for a Agenda Item 13 21 three-year. period. The local match required over the three year term is $320,877. This amount will be funded by SAFE-DMV fees (20%) and state of California funds (80%), which :is consistent with the funding split of all other FSP beats. The $106,959 .for the first of three years of the local match is included in the approved FY 2007/08 Motorist Assistance budget. Staff prepared an application to fund two new beats and submitted it to the MSRC in January 2007. - The application was approved; however, staff had a revision to the initial contract received from the MSRC. Staff is expecting a revised contract with a corrected minimum number of days per fiscal year. The approved beats (Beat No. 7 and Beat No.1.9). submitted in the application extend FSP service on the SR-60 from the San Bernardino :County line to the SR-91 /1-215 interchange and on the 1-215 south from the SR=60/1-215 interchange to SR-74. Like all other FSP projects, this project is, designed to assist motorists during peak commute hours and mitigate congestion and reduce vehicle emissions. Corridor: Beat Length: Beat Boundaries: Start Date: a■■ RiverSide Agenda Item 13 Beat No. 7 Beat No: 19 SR-60 I-215 ( 11.7 miles ) ( 10.0 miles ) Milliken Street Alessandro Boulevard to Main Street to SR-74 (4th Street) March 2007:: August 2007 ; 22 Each beat will be patrolled by two trucks during hours of operation. Hours of Operation: Monday:- Thursday.. 5:30 a.m.. 8:30 a.m. & 3:00 p.m.—.7:00. p.m. Friday: 5:30 a.m. 8:30 a.m. & 1:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. �•■nnan•"■•.. New Beat • �•■■n•.i■■■a- Financial Information Yes FY 2007/08 $275,000 In Fiscal Year Budget: Year: FY 2008/09 & Amount: N N/A . FY 2009/10 $550,000 Source of Funds: State Funds (MSRC grant) Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: 201 45 41509 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \i_� Date: 6/25/07 Agenda Item 13- 23 REVISION TO AGENDA ITEM 14. Additions are noted by bold Italics, Deletions are noted by c*rik� h RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Marlin Feenstra, Capital Projects Program Manager Mark Massman, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Award of a Consultant Services Agreement to the First Ranked Consultant Team to Provide Preliminary Engineering Services, Project Reports and Environmental Documents for the Interstate 215 Corridor from the 1-215/1-15 Interchange to Nuevo Road in the City of Perris STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the selection and retain the top five ranked consultant teams as part of a pre -qualified ranked list to be used to assist the Commission with preliminary engineering services required for the preparation, to final approval, of separate project reports (PR) and environmental documents (ED) for proposed improvements to 1-10, 1-215, and State Route 91, for four Measure A projects and one on -call project, in Western Riverside County, which are proposed to be delivered in the first five years of the 2009 Measure A 10-Year Delivery Plan. The list will be valid for a one year duration; 2) Award a consultant services agreement to the first ranked consultant team to provide preliminary engineering services for the preparation of Ca!trans PR/ED for the proposed improvements to the 1-215 corridor, from the 1-215/1-15 Interchange to Nuevo Road in the city of Perris. At this time, staff is negotiating with the ls` ranked consultant team and the first r-a ke,, Ga u-lt- nt t-ea tias et lae r l, -t a staff expects to bring a rankcd list to the Committee meeting, complete negotiations and bring a final contract at the July 11, 2007 Commission meeting; 3) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In November 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved the extension of the current Riverside County Measure A '/s cent sales tax for 30 years, from 2009 to 2039, to fund transportation improvement projects throughout Riverside County. For the past year, Commission staff has been working to update each specified project scope and respective cost estimate and work to develop an objective set of project measurements, including state recognized performance measures, to support the Commission in establishing priorities for the first 10 years of the 30-year Measure A program. In conjunction with this prioritization effort, Commission staff was also looking into the feasibility of the implementation of "managed lanes" onto specific corridors in Western Riverside County, specifically on SR-91, 1-15, and with the proposed Mid County Parkway project. This prioritization effort and managed lane study were completed, presented and approved by the Commission in December 2006. In summary, staff recommended and the Commission concurred that the SR-91, I-10, 1-15 and 1-215 were critical corridors that should be given priority for needed expansion and improvement. The Commission also concurred with staff's recommendation that the implementation of managed lanes on the SR-91 and 1-15 corridors should be included as a viable alternative for improvements to the corridors. At this meeting, the Commission directed staff to prepare and advertise request for proposals (RFP)/request for statements of qualifications (SOO) to conduct preliminary engineering and prepare PR/ED for the projects listed in the approved 10-Year Western Riverside County Highway Delivery Plan (Delivery Plan). The approved Delivery Plan was further split into two groups. The first group is proposed to be delivered within the first five years, and the second group is proposed to be delivered in the last five years. The following is a listing of the Measure A projects that are proposed to be delivered in the first five years, excluding the SR-91, 1-15 and SR-91/I-15 interchange major corridor improvements which are part of another agenda Item: Agenda Item 14 Corridor Project Limits Proposed Improvements Cost in Millions SR-91 / SR-71 Green River Rd. to Serfas Club Dr. Add Eastbound Collector Distributor System and Direct Connector $99 1-215 1-15/1-215 Interchange to Scott Rd. Add 1 Mixed Flow (MF) Lane each direction $62 1-215 Scott Rd to Nuevo Rd Add 1 MF Lane each direction $173 1-215 Nuevo Rd to Box Springs Rd Add 1 HOV Lane each direction $182 1-10 San Bernardino County Line to SR-60 Add EB Truck Climbing Lane $47 It should also be noted that the 1-215 project, from the 1-15/1-215 interchange to Scott Road, is funded with Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) funding, which requires that the project must be awarded for construction prior to 2011. This project is part of a larger segment from the 1-15/1-215 interchange to Nuevo Road. To assure that the Commission meets the CMIA schedule commitment for this project, staff developed the SOQ so that the subsequent first awarded contract to the first ranked firm, would be for the 1-215 project, from the 1-15/1-215 interchange to Nuevo Road, and this project was used as the sample project for the RFP. The RFP was developed to request SOQs from qualified transportation, environmental and engineering consultants for evaluation, interview, ranking and obtaining Commission approval of a pre -qualified ranked list of up to five consultant teams to be used to assist the Commission with preliminary engineering services required for the preparation, to final approval, of separate PR/ED for proposed improvements to I-10, 1-215, and SR-91, for four Measure A projects and one on -call project, in Western Riverside County, which are proposed to be delivered in the first five years of the Delivery Plan as summarized above. The remainder of the consultant teams on the ranked list will be given the opportunity, in order of ranking, to propose to provide preliminary engineering services for one of the remaining projects listed above, if the project is started within one-year after the ranked list is approved. After one-year, the list will expire and will require another request for SOQ to develop a new list, as the Commission deems necessary. Agenda Item 14 Calendar of Events: Distribution of RFQ Bidders Information Meeting (not mandatory) SOQs Delivered to RCTC prior to 2 p.m. Short Listed Firms were Notified Interviews of Short Listed Firms Staff Recommendation to Commission Selection Process: April 9, 2007 April 26, 2007 May 24, 2007 June 7, 2007 June 21, 2007 July 11, 2007 A selection panel was assembled, which consisted of representatives from the Commission, Caltrans, county of Riverside, city of Moreno Valley, city of Perris and Bechtel staffs. Commission staff received proposals from 14 firms. The selection panel reviewed the 14 proposals and decided to short list the top ranked eight firms and invited the eight firms to be interview by the selection panel. Staff recommends that the Commission retain the top five ranked consultant teams as part of a pre -qualified ranked list to be used to assist the Commission with preliminary engineering services required for the preparation, to final approval, of separate PR/ED for proposed improvements to 1-10, 1-215, and SR-91, for four Measure A projects and one on -call project, in Western Riverside County, which are proposed to be delivered in the first five years of the Delivery Plan. The selection panel recommends that the Commission approve the following pre -qualified ranked list of five consultants. The list will be valid for a one-year duration. 1) PBS&J 2) URS 31 Parsons 4) HDR 5) Jacobs Staff also recommends that consultant services agreement be awarded to the first ranked consultant team to provide preliminary engineering services for the preparation of Caltrans PR/ED for the two proposed improvements to the 1-215 corridor, from the 1-215/1-15 interchange to Nuevo Road in the city of Perris. At this time, staff is negotiating with the 1st ranked consultant team and the Se'^^tine anc' • ^k ny hec ^et been-eo.,,p:�� ' Staff expects to bring the results of .vva. v.. u.. .M.. . {, Additionally, staff expects to complete contract negotiations with the top ranked firm and bring a contract with that firm to the Commission's July 11th meeting. Agenda Item 14 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: To be determined Source of Funds: Commercial Paper Budget Ad ustment: N/A GLA No.: 222 31 81101 P 3022, P 3023 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \44,4avi - Date: 6/25/07 Agenda Item 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Budget and -Implementation Committee FROM: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Marlin Feenstra, Capital Projects Program Manager Mark Massman, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Award of a Consultant Services Agreement to the First Ranked Consultant Team to Provide Preliminary Engineering Services, Project Reports and Environmental Documents for: the Interstate 215 Corridor from the 1-215/1-15 Interchange to Nuevo Road in the City of Perris STAFF RECOMMENDATION; This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the selection and retain the top five ranked `consultant teams as part of a pre -qualified ranked list to be used to assist the Commission with preliminary engineering services required for the preparation, to final approval, of separate project reports (PR) and environmental documents (ED) for proposed improvements to 1-10, 1-215, - and State Route 91, for four _ Measure . A projects;, and one on -call project, in Western Riverside County, which are proposed to be delivered in the first five years of the 2009 Measure A 10-Year Delivery Plan. The list will be valid for a one year duration; 2) Award a consultant services agreement to the first ranked consultant 'team to provide preliminary engineering services for the preparation of Caltrans PR/ED for the proposed improvements to the I-215 corridor, from the 1-215/1-15 Interchange to Nuevo Road in the city of Perris. At this time, the first ranked consultant team has not been selected. Staff expects to bring a ranked list to the Committee meeting, complete negotiations and bring a final contract at the July 11 2007 Commission meeting; 3) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. Agenda Item 14 24 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 'November 2002,the voters of Riverside County approved the extension of. the current` Riverside County Measure A % cent sales tax for 30 years, from 2009 to 2039, to fund transportation improvement projects throughout Riverside County. For the :past year, Commission staff has been working to update each specified project scope and respective cost estimate and work to develop an objective set of project measurements, including state recognized performance measures, to support the Commission in establishing priorities for the first 10 years of the 30-year Measure A program. In conjunction with this prioritization effort, Commission staff was also looking into the feasibility of the implementation of "managed lanes" onto specific corridors in Western Riverside County, specifically on SR-91, 1-15, and with the proposed Mid County Parkway project. This prioritization effort and managed lane study were completed, presented and approved by the Commission in December 2006. In summary, staff recommended and the Commission concurred that the SR-91, 1-10, 1-15 and 1-215 were ` critical corridors that should be given priority for needed expansion and improvement. The Commission also concurred with staff's recommendation that the implementation of managed lanes on the SR-91 and 1-15 corridors should be included, as a viable alternative for irnprovements to the corridors. At this meeting,- the Commission directed staff to prepare and advertise request for proposals (RFP)/request for statements of qualifications (SOO) to conduct preliminary engineering and prepare PR/ED for the projects 'listed in . the approved 10-Year Western 'Riverside County Highway Delivery iPlan (Delivery Plan). The: approved Delivery Plan was further split into two groups. The first group is proposed to be delivered within the first five years, and the - second group is proposed to be delivered in the last five years. The following is a listing of the Measure Aj projects .. that are p proposed to be delivered in the first five years, excluding the SR-.91, 1-15 and SR-91 /I-15 interchange major corridor improvements which are part of another agenda Item: Agenda Item 14 25 Corridor Project Limits Proposed Improvements Cost in Millions SR-91 / SR-71 Green River Rd. to Serfas Club Dr. Add Eastbound Collector Distributor System and Direct Connector $99 1-215 1-15/1-215 Interchange to Add 1 Mixed Flow (MF) Lane each direction $62 -215 Scott Rd to Add 1 MF Lane each direction $173 - 1-215 Nuevo Rd to Box Springs Rd Add 1 HOV Lane each direction $182 1-10 San Bernardino County Line to SR-60 Add EB Truck Climbing Lane $47 1t should also be noted that the 1-215 project, from the 1-15/1-215 interchange to Scott Road, is funded with Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA): funding, which requires that the project must be awarded for construction prior to 2011 This project is :part of a larger segment from the 1-15/1-215 interchange to Nuevo Road. To assure that the Commission meets the CMIA schedule commitment for -this. project staff developed: the SOQ so that the subsequent first awarded contract to the first ranked firm, would be for the -215 :project, from the 1-15/1-215 interchange to Nuevo Road, and this project was used as the sample project for the RFP. The RFP was .' developed to request SOQs from qualified transportation, environmental and engineering consultants for evaluation, interview, ranking and obtaining Commission approval of a pre -qualified ranked List of up to five consultant teams to be used to assist the Commission with preliminary engineering services required for the preparation, to final approval, of separate PR/ED for proposed improvements to 1-10, 1-215, and SR-91, for four Measure A , projects and one on -call project, in Western Riverside County, which are proposed to be delivered in the first five years of the Delivery Plan as summarized above. The remainder of the consultant teams on the ranked list will be given the opportunity, in order of ranking, to propose to provide preliminary engineering services for one of the remaining projects listed above, if the project is :started within one-year after the ranked list is approved. After one-year, the list will expire and will require another request for SOQ to develop a new list, as the Commission deems necessary. Agenda Item 14 26 Calendar of Events: Distribution of RFQ Bidders Information Meeting ('not mandatory) SOQs Delivered to RCTC prior to 2 p.m. Short Listed Firms were Notified Interviews of Short Listed Firms Staff Recommendation to Commission Selection Process: April 9, 2007 April 26, 2007 May 24, 2007 June 7, 2007 June 21, 2007 July 11, .2007 A selection panel was assembled, which consisted of representatives from the Commission, Caltrans, county of Riverside, city of Moreno ,Valley, city of -Perris and Bechtel staffs.. Commission staff received proposals from 14 firms. The selection panel reviewed the 14 proposals and decided to short list the top ranked eight firms and invited the eight firms to be interview by the selection panel. Staff recommends that the: Commission retain the top five ranked consultant teams as part of a pre -qualified ranked list to be used to assist the Commission with preliminary engineering services required for the preparation, to final .approval, of separate ;PR/ED for proposed improvements to 1-10, I-215, and SR-91, for _four Measure A projectsand one on -call project, in Western Riverside ,Country, ;which are i proposed to be delivered in the first five years of the Delivery Plan. The list will be valid for a one-year duration. Staff also recommends that consultant services agreement be awarded to the first ranked consultant team to provide preliminary engineering services for the preparation of Caltrans PR/ED for the two p pro osed improvements to the 1=215 corridor, from the; I-215/1-15, interchange to Nuevo Road in the city of Perris. At this time, the selection and ranking has not been completed. Staff expects to bring the results of the consultant interview rankings to the committee meeting for consideration.: Additionally, staff expects to complete contract negotiations with is the top ranked- firm and bring, a contract with that firm to the Commission's July 11 to meeting. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: To be determined Source of Funds:. : Commercial. Paper Budget Adjustment: N/A GLA No.: 222 .31 81101 P;3022, P 3023 Fiscal Procedures Approved: 1,,m Date:. 6/25/07 Agenda Item 14 27 AGENDA ITEM 15 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director -Mark Massman, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT:: Award of a Consultant Services Agreement to Parsons Brinckerhoff to Prepare a Project Report and Environmental Document 'for the; State Route 91 Project from State Route 241 to Pierce. Street, a State Route 91 /Interstate 15 Median Direct Connector and Interstate 15 Median Widening from State Route 91 ' to Cajalco Road STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the selection' process and = award aconsultant ' services . Agreement No. 08-31-001-00 to Parsons Brinckerhoff to perform preliminary engineering services and prepare a-Caltrans project report (PR) and environmental document (ED) for the development of proposed improvements to the SR-91 corridor, from SR-241 to Pierce Street, including the proposed addition. 'of a: northbound (NB) to eastbound (EB) SR-91 /1-15 median direct connector and proposed improvements to 1-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road. At this time the contract is still in negotiations and staff expects to bring a final contract to either the Committee or the Commission meeting; 2) 'Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: SR-91 is the only significant highway corridor that provides the home -to -work connection for Riverside Countyresidents working in Orange County. The -SR-91 freeway is utilized by more than 280,000 _ vehicles per day at the Orange/Riverside County line, and this volume continues to grow. At the same time, freeway travel speeds are well below 30 miles per hour during lengthy Agenda Item 15' 28 morning and evening peak periods. Traffic is forecast to increase by approximately 50 percent, by year 2030. In order to address the short and long term needs of SR-91 the Commission, together with Caltrans and Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), have conducted the following studies: State Route 91 Major Investment Study Locally Preferred Strategy (2004) 1 "Establish Riverside Freeway (SR-91) from the Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) to Corona Freeway (1-15) as a priority for improving transportation between Riverside and Orange counties. Emphasize. Riverside Freeway (SR-91) improvements between the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor (SR-241) and the Corona Freeway (1-15) first " • "Continue to work with the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency to develop a mutually acceptable plan to improve the connection between the 'Foothill/ Eastern Transportation Corridor (SR-241) and Riverside Freeway. (SR-91) ., "Continue. to evaluate costs and impacts with Corridor ,A in the Riverside Freeway :`(SR-91-) ` right of `way through a future preliminary engineering process in cooperation with other agencies." Caltrans State Route 91 Project Study Report (2006) Alternatives 1 The addition .of .an EB auxiliary_ lane from SR-241 to SR-71, Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMlA) project to be developed and constructed by OCTA and potential EB mixed flow/auxiliary lane by the Commission; and 2. The addition of one westbound (WB) mixed flow lane and one WB auxiliary lane from SR-241 to SR-71; and 3.. Improvements to the existing SR-91 /SR-71 . interchange, : ex P 9 9 eluding the EB collector -distributor system from Green River -Road. to SR-71 and the new direct connector from EB SR-91 to NB SR-71; and 4. The addition of one mixed flow lane and one auxiliary lane, in each direction, from SR-71 to Pierce St, in the city of Riverside; and 5 Interchange improvements, at all existing interchanges, from SR-241 to Pierce Street, in the city of Riverside; and 6 The addition of a Collector -Distributor System on SR-91,. in both directions, from Lincoln Avenue to 1-15. Agenda :Item 15 29 As a result of passage of the Measure A Extension (2009 to 2039), in December 2006, the Commission adopted the 10-Year Western Riverside County Highway Delivery Plan (Delivery Plan). In this action, the Commission also directed staff to proceed with developing a PR/ED to implement all of the new projects identified in the Delivery Plan. The proposed SR-91 corridor improvements were given a .high priority by the Commission. Consultant Selection Process Staff proceeded to initiate consultant selection for the SR-91 project with the following schedule: Calendar of Events: Distribution of RFP Bidders Information Meeting (not mandatory) Proposals were Delivered to RCTC prior to 2 p.m. Short Listed Firms were Notified Interviews of. Short Listed Firms Staff Recommendation to Commission March 5, 2007 March 22, 2007 April 19, 2007 May 3, 2007 May 17, 2007' July 11,, 2007 A selection. "panel was assembled, which: consisted of.._ representatives from the- Commission, OCTA, Caltrans, city of Corona and Bechtel staffs. Staff received proposals from two firms. The selection panel reviewed both proposals and concluded that both firms demonstrated that .they would be capable of completing the proposed scope of work and therefore, both firms were short listed and invited to be interview by the selection panel. After careful evaluation of the personnel of the proposed project teams, knowledge . of the project and proposed project approach during the interview process, the selection panel ranked the two firms as follows: Top Ranked Second Ranked Parsons Brinckerhoff (PBQ&D) Carter & Burgess, Inc. After selection, the PBQ&D cost proposal was opened and negotiations initiated. Staff is working with PBQ&D to reach an agreement. Assuming that negotiations are successfully completed, _staff expects to recommend that a consultant services agreement be awarded :to PBQ&D to conduct preliminary engineering and prepare a PR/ED for the development of proposed improvements to the SR-91 Corridor, from SR-241 to Pierce Street, including the proposed addition of a NB to EB SR-91 /1-1-5 median direct connector and proposed . improvements to I-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road. Final scope, schedule and cost for. the contract will be _presented to Agenda item 15 30 the Committee (if ready) or Commission. Staff is expediting for the JulyCommission meeting since the Commission is not expected to meet in August. Financial Information In fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: $7,000,000 Source of Funds: Commercial paper Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: 222 31 81101 P3026 ($7,000,000) 222 31 81 101 P3026 ($ 18,000,000 Future Years) Fiscal Procedures Approved: ,14/4 Date: 6/25/07 Agenda Item 15 31 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Budget & Implementation Committee FROM: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Marlin Feenstra, Capital Projects Program Manager Mark Massman, Bechtel Project Manager. Robert Wunderlich, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement with David Evans and Associates for the Development of Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate for the Construction of the State Route 74/Interstate 215 Interchange Improvement Project in the City of Perris STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the selection process and award consultant Agreement No. 07-31 122=00 to David Evans and Associates, Inc. to perform final engineering services and prepare plans, specifications, and cost estimate (PS&E) for the construction of the SR-74/I-215 Interchange .. improvement project in the city of Perris based on the attached project scope, schedule and cost for the base amount of $2,091,662 plus -a :contingency amount of $218,338 (10.4%), to cover potential changes in scope for a total not to exceed amount of $2,310,000; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director or his designee to approve " contingency work as may be required for the project; and 4) forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The proposed limits of the project will be from the intersection of Fourth Street and ,G Street to the intersection of Redlands Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue in the city of Perris. At its April 13, 2005 meeting, the Commission awarded a contract to David Evans and Associates (Agreement No. 05-31-544) to perform preliminary engineering and environmental services to produce a project report (PR) and environmental Agenda Item 16 32 document (ED) (joint NEPA and CEQA document) for the 1989 Measure A -215/SR=74/G ..Street interchange improvement project. Caltrans is lead agency under CEQA and FHWA is lead agency under NEPA. This work is in process and the draft environmental document has been submitted to Caltrans for review. This item is to secure the services of a consultant to perform final design for. this 1989 Measure A project and have that consultant under contract near the estimated completion of the environmental document in order to facilitate the projects delivery. Final design work will begin only after conceptual approval of the singleremaining alternative under consideration has been obtained from FHWA. Staff will also work with Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) on i Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) funding coordination to .support the final design effort, and Measure A funds will also be included in funding this phase of .work. At its January 10, 2007 meeting, the Commission approved and directed staff to issue a request for proposals to prepare the PS&E for the SR=74/I-215 interchange improvement project. Calendar of Events Distribution of RFP Bidders Information Meeting (not mandatory) Proposals were 'Delivered to RCTC prior to 2 p.m. Short Listed Firms were Notified Interviews of Short Listed Firms Staff Recommendation to Commission' Selection -Process A selection panel was assembled, :which consisted of : representativesfrom the Commission, Caltrans,` the city of Perris and Bechtel staffs. Staff received proposals from two firms. The selection panel reviewed the proposals and it was decided to interview both firms. January 16, 2007 January 30, 2007 March 1, 2007 March 13, 2007 March 20, 2007 July 11, 2007 Both firms demonstrated that they would be capable of completing the proposed scope of of work. After careful evaluation of the personnel of the proposed project teams, knowledge of the project, and proposed project approach, the selection panel ranked the firms as follows: 33 Top Ranked Second David Evans and Associates, Inc. Stantec Consulting, Inc After David Evans and Associates was selected as the top ranked firm, its cost proposal was opened and reviewed by staff. The scope of work cost proposal, and proposed schedule were found to be generally acceptable. Staff has been working with David Evans and Associates and has come to an agreement concerning the attached scope of work, schedule of services and the respective costs. Based on the results of the selection committee, staff recommends that Agreement No. 07-31=022=00 be awarded to David Evans and Associates, Inc. to perform final engineering services and prepare PS&E for the construction of the State Route 74/ I-215 Interchange improvement project in the city of Perris based . on the ' attached project scope, schedule and cost for the base amount of $2,091,662 plus a contingency amount of $218,338 (10.4%), to cover potential changes in scope for a total not to exceed amount of $2,310,000. PS&E is expected to take approximately 16 months. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: FY 2007/08 $.1,600,000 N/A Year: FY 2008/09 Amount: $ 710,000 Source of Funds: Measure A/TUMF Budget Adjustment: No GLA 222 31. 81101__ P 3015 ., $ 100,000-.. _ No.: 2 222 31 81102 P 3015 $1,500,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: itil Date: 6/25/07 Attachments: 1) Scope of Work 2) Cost Proposal 3) Proposed Schedule Agenda Item 16 34 " " E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s f o r P S & E f o r t h e I - 2 1 5 / S R 7 4 I n t e r c h a n g e P r o j e c t i n t h e C i t y o f P e r r i s D a v i d E v a n s a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c : S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s P a g e 1 o f 1 1 P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t ( W B S 1 0 0 ) T h i s t a s k i n c l u d e s o v e r a l l p r o j e c t m a n a g e m e n t , P r o j e c t D e v e l o p m e n t T e a m ( P D T ) l e a d e r s h i p , p r o g r e s s m o n i t o r i n g a n d m a i n t e n a n c e o f p r o j e c t f i l e s . D E A w i l l s u p e r v i s e , c o o r d i n a t e , m o n i t o r a n d r e v i e w a l t e r n a t i v e s . d e v e l o p m e n t f o r c o n f o r m a n c e w i t h C a l t r a n s a n d l o c a l a g e n c y s t a n d a r d s , p o l i c i e s a n d p r o c e d u r e s . T h e s c h e d u l i n g a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c t i v i t i e s w i l l s e r v e a s t h e b a s i s f o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e P r o j e c t W o r k P l a n . T h i s P r o j e c t W o r k P l a n w i l l b e p r o v i d e d t o a l l m e m b e r s o f t h e P r o j e c t D e v e l o p m e n t T e a m t o e n s u r e t h a t a l l m e m b e r s c l e a r l y u n d e r s t a n d t h e i r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s a n d t h e t i m e l i n e s s o f e x e c u t i n g t h e s e r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s . : D E A w i l l p r e p a r e a C a l t r a n s W o r k B r e a k d o w n S t r u c t u r e ( W B S ) s c h e d u l e a n d i n t e g r a t e p r o j e c t m i l e s t o n e s . . T h e s c h e d u l e w i l l b e u p d a t e d b i - m o n t h l y o r m o r e f r e q u e n t l y a s r e q u i r e d a n d a v a r i a n c e a n a l y s i s p r o v i d e d i n o u r m o n t h l y r e p o r t . I t i s p l a n n e d t o u s e M i c r o s o f t P r o j e c t S o f t w a r e . D E A w i l l o r g a n i z e a n d a t t e n d t h e m o n t h l y P D T m e e t i n g s t o d i s c u s s s c o p e , s c h e d u l e a n d c o s t , a n d o t h e r m e e t i n g s a s r e q u i r e d f o r c o o r d i n a t i o n . D E A w i l l p r o v i d e d i s c u s s i o n m a t e r i a l s a n d a g e n d a s a n d w i l l p r e p a r e a n d d i s t r i b u t e m e e t i n g n o t e s . D E A w i l l d e v e l o p a n a c t i o n i t e m m a t r i x , d o c u m e n t a l l p r o j e c t d e c i s i o n s a n d d i s t r i b u t e c o r r e s p o n d e n c e c o p i e s t o a l l P r o j e c t T e a m m e m b e r s a s a p p r o p r i a t e . D E A w i l l p r o v i d e m o n t h l y i n v o i c e s i n R C T C f o r m a t i n c l u d i n g p r o j e c t s t a t u s r e p o r t s a s p a r t o f t h e R C T C i n v o i c e f o r m a t : P r e p a r e B a s e M a p s a n d P l a n S h e e t s ( W B S 1 8 5 ) P e r f o r m D e s i g n - S u r v e y s D E A w i l l p e r f o r m s p e c i f i c d e s i g n l e v e l s u r v e y s o n t h e a l r e a d y e x i s t i n g b a s e m a p p i n g t o p o g r a p h y . T h e d e s i g n l e v e l s u r v e y s w i l l i n c l u d e : " E d g e o f p a v e m e n t e l e v a t i o n s . " F l o w l i n e e l e v a t i o n s f o r e x i s t i n g d i t c h e s , a n d s t o r m d r a i n s t o b e t i e d t o P a v e m e n t e l e v a t i o n s a t t h e p r o p o s e d b r i d g e c r o s s i n g l o c a t i o n " G r o u n d t o p o g r a p h y f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n o f r e t a i n i n g w a l l s a n d s o u n d w a l l s " F i e l d v e r i f i c a t i o n o f u t i l i t i e s T h e w o r k d e s c r i l l e d h e r e i s a n e s t i m a t e a n d r e p r e s e n t s 6 f i e l d c r e w d a y s . P e r f o r m P r e l i m i n a r y D e s i g n D E A w i l l r e v i e w t h e f i n a l a p p r o v e d G e o m e t r i c A p p r o v a l D r a w i n g w i t h C a l t r a n s a n d R C T C t o d e t e r m i n e i f a n y a d d i t i o n a l m o d i f i c a t i o n s o r r e v i s i o n s a r e n e e d e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t . B a s e d o n t h i s r e v i e w , D E A w i l l m a k e a d j u s t m e n t s a n d i d e n t i f y a n y a d d i t i o n a l a c t i o n s r e q u i r e d t o m e e t C a l t r a n s r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r t h e p r o j e c t . P r e p a r e E n g i n e e r i n g R e p o r t s D r a i n a g e S t u d y T o p r e p a r e h y d r o l o g y a n d d r a i n a g e d e s i g n s a n d t h e s t o r m w a t e r m a n a g e m e n t p l a n f o r t h e . p r o p o s e d i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d i n c o r p o r a t e t h a t i n f o r m a t i o n i n t o a s t a n d a l o n e r e p o r t . . D E A w i l l o b t a i n a v a i l a b l e h y d r o l o g i c a n d h y d r a u l i c i n f o r m a t i o n f r o m t h e C i t y o f P e r r i s , t h e C o u n t y F l o o d C o n t r o l D i s t r i c t a n d C a l t r a n s . T h i s m a y i n c l u d e t h e ; h y d r a u l i c d e s i g n p a r a m e t e r s i n c l u d i n g l a t e s t a s - b u i l t p l a n s , d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e , d e s i g n w a t e r s u r f a c e e l e v a t i o n o n e x i s t i n O r a i n a g e s y s t e m s . 3 5 Engineering Services for PS&E for the I-215/SR74 Interchange Project in the City of Perris David Evans and Associates, Inc. Scope of .Services Page 2of11 The base map and other information will be used to provide a base for the onsite hydrology and hydraulic exhibits. The hydrology study will be prepared for the interchange areas following Caltrans and County methods. Calculations will be based on existing freeway and street grades as noted by the survey. Preliminary hydrologic calculations will be prepared to determine inadequacies of the existing drainage system. We anticipate that:onsite hydrology calculations for the 25-year and 50-year storm event will be prepared using the County hydrology manual rational method. DEA will prepare Best Management Practices (BMPs) plans as identified in the Storm Water. Data Report. includes impact reduction measures, design pollution prevention measures, and treatment measures. These facilities will be discussed in the Drainage Report as part of this phase of the work. A layout of the proposed drainage system will described and a hydraulic analysis of the system provide in the drainage study. Geotechnical Design Report Our Geotechnical Design Report for design and construction of embankments and pavement structural sections will be prepared in general accordance with California Test Method CAL-130, and will present the data obtained during field exploration and laboratory testing, as well as the following conclusions, recommendations, and discussions. Project description including proposed improvements, climatic conditions, terrain and surface drainage, and land use. Discussion of geotechnical settings including regional geology, subsurface soil and groundwater conditions. • Recommendations for construction of roadway and embankment foundations and estimated settlement. • Evaluation of gross and surficial stability of the proposed fill slopes. • Earthwork considerations, including excavation characteristics of the underlying materials. • Collapse, expansion,; and '.corrosion .potentials of the subgrade_ soils and recommended mitigation" measures, if necessary. Earthquake considerations including seismic design criteria for fill :embankment, and seismic hazards including the potential for liquefaction, ground rupture due to surface ,faulting and seismically induced settlement. Recommendations for pavement structural design based on traffic indices assumed or provided by the client. Discussion of materials available including local and commercial sourcesand materials specifications. Our findings; conclusions and recommendations will be presented in a Draft Geotechnical Design, Report with logs of the borings and laboratory test results. After review by the client, Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and Caltrans, comments will be incorporated into the report and a final report submitted. We assume one round of review comments from each agency prior to completion of our final report. Materials Report / Pavement Design Report The Materials Report will present data obtained from the field exploration and laboratory testing, as well as recommendations regarding pavement structural section design based on traffic indices provided by the client and current Caltrans design methods. The Materials Report will also discuss potential import materials including local and commercial sources and preliminary materials specifications: Findings, conclusions and recommendations will be presented in a draft Materials Report with boring logs and laboratory test results. Comments received from the draft Materials Report will be incorporated into the report 36 " " E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s f o r P S & E f o r t h e I - 2 1 5 / S R 7 4 I n t e r c h a n g e P r o j e c t i n t h e C i t y o f P e r r i s D a v i d E v a n s a n d a s s o c i a t e s , I n c . S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s P a g e 3 o f 1 1 a n d a f i n a l r e p o r t s u b m i t t e d . O n e r o u n d o f r e v i e w c o m m e n t s f r o m e a c h a g e n c y p r i o r t o c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e f i n a l r e p o r t . I n t h e e v e n t t h a t o u r e x p l o r a t o r y b o r i n g s a r e a d v a n c e d t h r o u g h e x i s t i n g p a v e m e n t , w e w i l l m e a s u r e t h e t h i c k n e s s o f t h e p a v e m e n t a n d p r e s e n t t h a t d a t a i n o u r r e p o r t . F i e l d o r l a b o r a t o r y t e s t i n g o f . p o t e n t i a l i m p o r t m a t e r i a l s s i t e s i s n o t i n c l u d e d i n t h i s s c o p e o f s e r v i c e s . a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d , a s e p a r a t e M a t e r i a l s R e p o r t w i l l b e p r o v i d e d f o r s u m m a r i z i n g t h e i n f o r m a t i o n r e l a t e d t o t h e - s t r u c t u r a l s e c t i o n r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s . T h i s r e p o r t w i l l b e u s e d f o r m a k i n g t h e f i n a l d e t e r m i n a t i o n f o r t h e s t r u c t u r a l s e c t i o n f o r t h e p r o j e c t . U p d a t e S W D R P e r f o r m a n u p d a t e o f t h e S t o r m W a t e r D a t a R e p o r t f o r t h e P S & E p h a s e o f t h e p r o j e c t i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h C a l t r a n s p r o c e d u r e s f o r t h i s d o c u m e n t . D E A w i l l c o o r d i n a t e w i t h C a l t r a n s S t o r m w a t e r c o o r d i n a t o r o f t h e d o c u m e n t a n d i n c o r p o r a t e t h e r e q u i r e d B M P S i n t o t h e d o c u m e n t a n d p r o j e c t p l a n s . U p d a t e T M D E A w i l l p r e p a r e a n d u p d a t e t o t h e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e m e n t P l a n b a s e d o n t h e s p e c i f i c s t a g i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r t h e p r o j e c t . I n i t i a l c o n c e p t u a l s t a g i n g p l a n s f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e b r i d g e a n d t h e r a m p w i l l b e f u r t h e r d e v e l o p e d f o r : i n c l u s i o n o f t h e i n t h e T M P D a t a S h e e t s . T h i s t a s k w i l l b e o n g o i n g t h r o u g h o u t t h e p r o j e c t p r o c e s s i n g o f t h e P S & E . P r e p a r e R i g h t o f W a y R e q u i r e m e n t M a p s D E A w i l l p r e p a r e t h e r i g h t o f w a y r e q u i r e m e n t m a p s b a s e d o n t h e a p p r o v e d G e o m e t r i c A p p r o v a l D r a w i n g s a n d t h e r e q u i r e d _ r i g h t o f w a y f o r t h e p r o j e c t . D E i A - w i l l _ i d e n t i f y . t h e n e c e s s a r y p r o p e r t y : f o r a c q u i s i t i o n b o t h a s i n . f e e : " a n d e a s e m e n t - a c q u i s i t i o n s , b o t h p e r m a n e n t a n d t e m p o r a r y e a s e m e n t s . T h e m a p s w i l l i n c l u d e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f t h e - - - p a r c e l s a f f e c t e d b y t h e p r o j e c t , . t h e a m o u n t o f p r o p e r t y r e q u i r e d f r o m t h e p a r c e l a n d t h e a r e a o f t h e r e m n a n t p r o p e r t y . T h e m a p w i l l b e p r e p a r e d t o t h e s a m e s c a l e a s t h e p r o p o s e d l a y o u t s h e e t s f o r t h e p r o j e c t , i . e . 1 i n c h 5 0 f e e t . T h i s s u b m i t t a l w i l l b e m a d e a s p a r t o f t h e 3 5 % S u b m i t t a l . P r e p a r e S t r u c t u r e S i t e P l a n s ( W B S 1 9 0 ) D E A w i l l r e f i n e t h e p r e v i o u s l y a p p r o v e d a d v a n c e P l a n n i n g S t u d y t o r e f l e c t t h e a p p r o v e d G e o m e t r i c D r a w i n g . " T h e S t r u c t u r e S i t e P l a n w i l l b e p r e p a r e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e C a l t r a n s p r o c e d u r e s a n d w i l l i d e n t i f y t h e c r i t i c a l d e s i g n e l e m e n t s . a d d i t i o n a l f i e l d s u r v e y s w i l l b e . p e r f o r m e d ( u n d e r s e p a r a t e t a s k ) t o i d e n t i f y b r i d g e c l e a r a n c e s f o r b o t h f i n a l a n d t e m p o r a r y c o n d i t i o n s . D E A w i l l d e v e l o p a p r e l i m i n a r y f o u n d a t i o n p l a n a s s u m i n g p i l e f o u n d a t i o n s a n d d e p i c t . t h e l i m i t s o f t h e a p p r o a c h e m b a n k m e n t s a n d a n y r e t a i n i n g w a l l s n e e d e d a d j a c e n t t o t h e f r e e w a y m a i n l i n e : N o n - s t a n d a r d r e t a i n i n g a n d s o u n d w a l l s a r e n o t a s s u m e d t o b e p r e s e n t o n t h e p r o j e c t a n d a r e n o t i n c l u d e d i n t h i s s c o p e o f s e r v i c e s . S t r u c t u r e s i t e P l a n w i l l p r e p a r e d a t t h e o n s e t o f t h e p r o j e c t o n c e t h e a p p r o v e d G A D i s a v a i l a b l e . T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n a l o n g w i t h t h e S i t e R e p o r t w i l l b e u s e d t o d e t e r m i n e t h e f i e l d b o r i n g ' l o g s r e q u i r e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t . T h e p r o p o s e d b o r i n g l o g l o c a t i o n s w i l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h i s s u b m i t t a l f o r C a l t r a n s t o r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v e . C o o r d i n a t e U t i l i t i e s ( W B S 2 0 0 ) U t i l i t y C o o r d i n a t i o n a n d L e t t e r s D E A w i l l i d e n t i f y t h e a f f e c t e d p r o p e r t y o w n e r s f o r , t h e p r o j e c t - a n d p r o v i d e a u t i l i t y r o s t e r o f t h e p a r t i e s . T h e r o s t e r w i l l i d e n t i f y t h e c o n t a c t p e r s o n f o r t h e p r o j e c t a l o n g w i t h t h e i r c o n t a c t i n f o r m a t i o n . D E A w i l l p r o v i d e 3 7 Engineering Services for PS&E for the I-215/SR74 Interchange Project in the City of Perris David Evans and Associates, Inc. Scope of Services Page 4 of 11 correspondence to the affected agencies at the key stages of the process, i.e. 35%, 65% and 95% plan sets for their review along with a final signed set of plans for their execution of any necessary relocation activities: At this time only two utility poles are anticipated as part of this scope of work. Potholing and Additional Field Surveys Potholing of any utilities found within the project site will be performed to satisfy: 1. Caltrans High and Low Risk Utility Policy 2. Identify the position of utilities which may be in confect with element of the project :to be designed. The potholing will be coordinated with a vendor service who performs these services as a regular practice. DEA and its vendor will be responsible for the proper notifications to Underground Service Alert and. other pertinent agencies such as Caltrans prior to performing any pothole activities. DEA will provide the necessary field survey work to identify the top of the facility as well as any invert elevations' that may be required for "wet" utility conflicts. At this time no specific utility conflicts are noted however this scope of services assumes 2 full days of survey and potholing services as may be required for the project. Utility Conflict Maps Upon completion of the potholing, DEA will prepare the Utility Conflicts Map for the project. This map will be prepared even should there be no conflicts as a matter of documenting just that case. The map will be .prepared ,onthe same layout sheets as the right of way Requirement Maps and :will include parcel information as well as the; -.' collected utility information. High and Low Risk utilities will be noted on the map in accordance with Caltrans policy for the same. This map. will be part of the 60% submittal along with the overall PSE submittal at that time. Obtain Permits and Agreements (WBS 205) DEA will be responsible for identifying the necessary permits for the project along with coordinating with Caltrans :for any specific requirements as may pertain to them or other agencies in the area. DEA will document the need and prepare 'applications for the required permits which will include: State Department of Fish and Game under Section 1602 of the State Fish and Game Code Federal Section 404 Permit or Nationwide Permit with the Army Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Branch State Water Quality Control Board for Section 401 of the Clean Water Act Other permits as may be applicable to the site. DEA assumes that no other permits will be required but will perform a search with the localagencies and identify' any as may be required. Prepare Preliminary Structures Design Data (VVBS 210) Perform Geotechnical.lnvestigation and Foundation :Report Structure Foundation Report will be prepared in accordance with Caltrans Guidelines for Foundation Investigations and Reports, and will include the following: • Seismic design recommendations including recommended acceleration response spectra `in accordance with the current Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria. 38 Engineering Services for PS&E for the I-215/SR74 Interchange Project in the City of Perris David Evans and Associates, Inc. Scope of Services Page 5of11 • Recommendations for design and construction of shallow or deep foundations including recommended bearing capacities, lateral resistance, and total and differential settlements. • Recommendations for design of retaining walls, including foundation type; allowable capacity and lateral pressures. • Overall stability analyses of footings,slope and foundation materials; evaluation for static and .pseudo - static conditions. • Construction considerations. • Log of Test Borings (LOTB) sheets. Our conclusions and recommendations pertaining to design and construction of foundation systems will be presented in a Draft Structure Foundation Report with a site map showing boring locations, LOT13 sheetsand laboratory test results. After review by client,. Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and Ca'trans, comments will be incorporated into the report and a final report submitted. We assume one round of review comments from each agency prior to completion of our first report. A final L0'113 sheet will be included as part of the Foundation Report and Contract Plans following review of the. LOTB. We assume nine LOTB Sheets will be provided, one for each boring and CPT at each abutment and bent location (5), and up to four (4) for the retaining walls. Engineering Site Investigation and Report DEA will prepare, a summary of the findins from the foundation report and its recommendations. This site investigation. report „will briefly detail the findings and be a support document for the bridge design to proceed into the Type Selection portion of the .design. DEA assumes this effort to be performed in conjunction with the results of the foundation recommendations and included in the Bridge Type Selection Report. Prepare Structure General Plan (WBS 215) Our team will develop' the -recommended -stricture type for final design. A General Plan (GP) cost estimate will be prepared for the recommended structure type: A Bridge Type Selection Memo will be prepared and will address the key issues associated with each site. These issues include but are not limited to: • Handling of traffic • Verification of girder depth and vertical temporary and permanentclearances over existing and future assumed facilities: • Verification of bent locations for horizontal temporary and permanent clearances to existing and future assumed facilities. • Providing structural engineering parameters to the geotechnical engineer for use in establishing a recommended foundation type considering dead; live and seismic loading conditions. • Document the recommended foundation type, shallow or deep, considering median construction impacts to traffic and foundation construction impact to canals. • Determination of bridge deck drainage system. Storm runoff from the bridge deck will be collected and discharged away from the right-of-way. • Identification of items built into the structures that will require future maintenance. • Verification of constructability for the proposed structure_ 39 Engineering Services for PS&E for the I-215/SR74 Interchange Project in the City of Perris David Evans and Associates, Inc. Scope of Services Page 6 of 11 • Proposed aesthetic treatments of proposed structures to enhance the appearance of the corridor, as may be directed by RCTC or PDT. Our team will document the findings and recommendations in the Bridge Type Selection Memo. A General Plan will be prepared showing the conceptual design for each site. We will attend the Bridge Selection Meeting to discuss the findings and obtain consensus on the recommendations. Upon approval of the structure type, our: team will proceed with the final design. DEA will deliver as part of this element of the scope of services: General Plan, Bridge Type Selection Memorandum, Seismic Design D/C Ratios for Substructure elements, Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate for the bridge. Perform Right of Way 'Engineering (WBS 220) Perform Land Net Surveys and Prepare Maps DEA will perform the necessary boundary survey requirements to document the existing property boundaries. This work will entail research of the existing boundary information and record survey monumentation. DEA has estimated 9 field days for surveying the boundary information on the project site The landnet map will be prepared showing the recovered monuments and identifying the location of record monuments. The map will be prepared in accordance with state requirements dictated by the state Professional LandSurveyors Act and Caltrans standards. This map will be used to,prepare.the Record of Survey Map to the County of Riverside. The Record of Survey . will depict the new and old centerlines for the project. The landnet map will then also be used to prepare the required legals and plats for the project property acquisitions. Prepare Right of Way Maps DEA will prepare the required Right of Way map for the project conforming to Caltrans standards for the project. pp . g gmapping.. ro ect. Ma m will be to a scale conforming to; the current standard on file for this reach of the I-215, corridor. No mapping is anticipated along the SR 74 corridor for this project. Prepare Acquisition Documents DE,A will prepare the legals and plats for the acquisition of the property required for the project. The properties involved will be those private property parcels adjacent to the project site and directly affected by the project. DEA has assumed 10 parcels for acquisition as part of this scope of services. Prepare Draft PS&E (WBS 230) The draft PSE will be submitted in 3 deliveries for review: 35%, 65% and 95%. The items for submittal in each are identified here. 35% Draft Plan Submittal Title Sheet Typical Sections Layout and Profile Sheets Retaining Wall Layouts Drainage Layout Plan 40 Grading/Contour Plan Traffic Striping Plans Bridge General Plan Sheet Conceptual Landscape Plan Utility Coordination Memorandum " 5 5 % D r a f t P l a n S u b m i t t a l T i t l e S h e e t T y p i c a l S e c t i o n s L a y o u t a n d P r o f i l e S h e e t s D r a i n a g e L a y o u t P l a n D r a i n a g e D e t a i l s a n d P r o f i l e s G r a d i n g / C o n t o u r P l a n R e t a i n i n g . W a l l L a y o u t s R e t a i n i n g W a l l D e t a i l s S o u n d W a l l P l a n s a n d D e t a i l s L a n d s c a p e P l a n t i n g P l a n s 9 5 % D r a f t P l a n S u b m i t t a l T h i s s u b m i t t a l s h a l l i n c l u d e a l l i t e m s n o t e d i n t h e 6 5 % a s w e l l a s t h e b a l a n c e o f i t e m s n o t e d i n t h e f o l l o w i n g s c o p e o f s e r v i c e s i d e n t i f y i n g t h e a n t i c i p a t e d p l a n s e t f o r d e l i v e r y E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s f o r P S & E f o r t h e I - 2 1 5 / S R 7 4 I n t e r c h a n g e P r o j e c t i n t h e C i t y . o f P e r r i s D a v i d E v a n s a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s P a g e 7 o f 1 1 T r a f f i c S t r i p i n g P l a n s T r a f f i c S i g n i n g P l a n s T r a f f i c E l e c t r i c a l P l a n s W P C P P l a n s T r a f f i c M a n a g e m e n t P l a n s B r i d g e G e n e r a l P l a n : S h e e t " U n c h e c k e d . " B r i d g e P l a n s P r o j e c t B i d I t e m L i s t P r o j e c t S p e c i a l P r o v i s i o n s U t i l i t y C o o r d i n a t i o n M e m o r a n d u m P r e p a r e R o a d w a y P l a n s D E A w i l l p r e p a r e t h e n e c e s s a r y r o a d w a y a n d f r e e w a y i m p r o v e m e n t p l a n s a s n e e d e d f o r t h e p r o p e r d e l i v e r y o f t h e p r o j e c t . R e t a i n i n g w a l l p l a n s f o r t h i s p r o j e c t a r e a n t i c i p a t e d t o b e s t a n d a r d r e t a i n i n g w a l l s a n d w i l l t h e r e f o r e n o t r e q u i r e a n y r e v i e w b y C a l t r a n s S t r u c t u r e s : U n i t . I t i s a n t i c i p a t e d t h e w a l l s w i l l ' b e " S t a n d a r d ` T y p e 1 R e t a i n i n g - W i l l s . A l l s o u n d w a l l s f o r t h e p r o j e c t a r e a n t i c i p a t e d t o b e s t a n d a r d w a l l p l a n s a s f o u n d i n C a l t r a n s X S D e t a i l S h e e t L i b r a r y . A e s t h e t i c t r e a t m e n t f o r t h e w a l l s i s a n t i c i p a t e d a n d i s i n c l u d e d i n t h i s p r o p o s a l . T h e p l a n s r e q u i r e d f o r t h e . p r o j e c t a r e a s f o l l o w s : S h e e t D e s c r i p t i o n E s t i m a t e d N u m b e r o f S h e e t s T i t l e S h e e t 1 T y p i c a l C r o s s S e c t i o n s 4 K e y M a p a n d L i n e I n d e x 1 R o a d w a y L a y o u t s 1 1 P r o f i l e a n d S u p e r e l e v a t i o n S h e e t s 9 C o n s t r u c t i o n D e t a i l s 4 C o n t o u r G r a d i n g P l a n s 1 1 S u m m a r y o f Q u a n t i t i e s S h e e t s 4 R e t a i n i n g W a l l P l a n s 1 2 S o u n d W a l l P l a n s a n d D e t a i l s 1 6 S t a n d a r d P l a n s 2 4 1 Engineering Services for PS&E for the I-215/SR74 Interchange Project in the City of Perris . David Evans and Associates, Inc. Scope of Services Page 8. of 11 Prepare Highway Planting Plans DEA will prepare the necessary planting and irrigation improvement plans as needed for the proper delivery of the project. Points of connection for the project are not known at this time. It is assumed the power and water connection points will be within the project site. A Conceptual Landscape Plan is required as part of the 35% plan submittal. This plan will depict the proposed locations of the planting in accordance with the planting scheme as determined by the PDT. DEA assumes the PDT will identify the plant palette for use on the project and that a single review by Caltrans will provide the direction for preparation of final plans. The plans required for the project are as follows: Sheet Description Estimated Number of Sheets Highway Planting Plans 11 Plant List 3 Irrigation Plans 13 Irrigation Quantity Sheets 1 Prepare Traffic Plans DEA will prepare the necessary traffic improvement plans as needed for the proper delivery of the project. Along . with street lighting plans as may be required along the ramps and the local road, 4 signalized intersections will be P. p g g ch p 9: tp , d � 3 salon Redlands Avenue� and 1` alon �4 .Street at Wilkerson: The. plans requited for he ro}.ect are as follows , Sheen Description Estimated Number of Sheets Prepare Signing and Pavement Delineation Plans 12 'Prepare Traffic Electrical Plans ( includes 4 signalized intersections) 17 Prepare TMP DEA will prepare the updated TransportationManagement Plans for the proper: delivery of the project. The plans required for the project are as follows: Sheet Description Estimated Number of Sheets Stage Construction Plans (2 Stages for Bridge Construction) 12 Construction Area Signs Plans 4 Detour Plans (SB "Off Ramp. Layout, Profile and Detail Plans) 5' Prepare ,Utility Plans DEA will prepare the Utility plan sheets for the proper delivery of the project. No utility relocation plans are included in this scope of services. The plans required for the project are as. follows: 42 " " E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s f o r P S & E f o r t h e I - 2 1 5 / S R 7 4 I n t e r c h a n g e P r o j e c t i n t h e C i t y o f P e r r i s D a v i d E v a n s a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s P a g e 9 o f 1 1 S h e e t D e s c r i p t i o n E s t i m a t e d N u m b e r o f S h e e t s U t i l i t y S h e e t s 1 1 P r e p a r e D r a i n a g e P l a n s D E A w i l l p r e p a r e t h e D r a i n a g e P l a n s f o r t h e p r o p e r d e l i v e r y o f t h e p r o j e c t . D r a i n a g e p l a n s a r e a s s u m e d t o i n c l u d e a n d b e l i m i t e d t o t h e o n s i t e d r a i n a g e i m p r o v e m e n t s . N o s p e c i f i c o f f s i t e o r r e g i o n a l d r a i n a g e f a c i l i t y i s i n c l u d e d i n t h i s s c o p e o f s e r v i c e s a s n o n e i s a n t i c i p a t e d t o b e e n c o u n t e r e d o n t h e p r o j e c t . T h e p l a n s r e q u i r e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t a r e a s f o l l o w s : S h e e t D e s c r i p t i o n . E s t i m a t e d N u m b e r o f S h e e t s D r a i n a g e : L a y o u t P l a n s D r a i n a g e P r o f i l e P l a n s 1 1 5 D r a i n a g e D e t a i l s a n d Q u a n t i t i e s 4 P r e p a r e W a t e r P o l l u t i o n C o n t r o l . P l a n s D E A w i l l p r e p a r e t h e w a t e r p o l l u t i o n c o n t r o l p l a n s h e e t s f o r t h e p r o p e r d e l i v e r y o f t h e p r o j e c t . T h e p l a n s r e q u i r e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t a r e a s f o l l o w s : S h e e t D e s c r i p t i o n E s t i m a t e d N u m b e r o f S h e e t s W P C P L a y o u t S h e e t s D e t a i l a n d Q u a n t i t y S h e e t s 1 1 2 P r e p a r e E r o s i o n C o n t r o l P l a n s D E A w i l l p r e p a r e t h e D r a i n a g e P l a n s f o r t h e p r o p e r d e l i v e r y o f t h e p r o j e c t T h e p l a n s r e q u i r e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t a r e a s f o l l o w s : S h e e t D e s c r i p t i o n E s t i m a t e d N u m b e r o f S h e e t s E r o s i o n C o n t r o l P l a n s 1 1 E r o s i o n C o n t r o l D e t a i l s a n d Q u a n t i t i e s 2 P r e p a r e C i v i l S p e c i f i c a t i o n s D E A w i l l p r e p a r e s p e c i f i c a t i o n s f o r t h e i t e m s o f w o r k n o t e d i n t h i s s e c t i o n _ S p e c i f i c a t i o n s w i l l b e p r e p a r e d i n c o n f o r m a n c e w i t h t h e C a l t r a n s S t a n d a r d S p e c i f i c a t i o n s a n d t h e C a l t r a n s S t a n d a r d S p e c i a l P r o v i s i o n s f o r m a t . D E A w i l l s u b m i t f u l l S S P s f o r C a l t r a n s r e v i e w w i t h a l l f o r m a t t i n g a n d S S P i n s t r u c t i o n s t u r n e d o n f o r p r o p e r r e v i e w b y C a l t r a n s . D E A w i l l s u b m i t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s a t t h e 6 0 % a n d 9 5 % _ s u b m i t t a l s t a g e o f t h e p r o j e c t . A b i d e s t i m a t e f o r m w i l l . b e p r o v i d e d f o r e a c h s u b m i t t a l a s w e l l . 4 3 Engineering Services for PS&E for the I-215/SR74 Interchange Project in the City of Perris David Evans and Associates, Inc. Scope of Services Page 10 of 11 Prepare Quantities and Estimates Quantities will documented in a project engineers notebook based on the bid items described in the engineer's estimate. Quantities will based on units of measure that will be required for payment as in accordance with the Caltrans Standard Specifications or as agreed to otherwise. DEA will provide this submittal at the 60% and 95% submittal stage for review. Prepare Draft Structures PS&E (WBS 240) DEA will prepare the Draft Bridge Design (Unchecked Details) including all plan sheets and design calculation's. The design will be based on the "LRFD" method. Seismic design will be performed in accordance with Caltrans "Seismic .Design Criteria" (version 1.2). Plans will be prepared in accordance with the Caltrans "Bridge Design Details". manual and PS&E documents will be prepared in conformance with City and Caltrans requirements. A Structure Item List will be prepared which will be used to develop the Special Provisions and Quantities. The assumptions used in developing the General Plan Estimate will be reviewed to identify possible impacts to the construction cost estimate. All PS&E documents will be developed using English units. DEA will provide Unchecked Bridge Plans and a Structure Item List as part of the Draft Bridge PSE Submittal. Prepare Final Structures PS&E Package (WBS 250) DEA will address the comments on the Draft Bridge Design (Unchecked Details). DEA will perform a complete independent check of the bridge design in accordance with Caltrans procedures, resolve review comments and revise the plans as required, prepare and review the Special Provisions, prepare quantity calculations and check_ calculations, and prepare -a construction cost estimate. DEA will -perform a senior review of the Final Bridge Design prior to submittal to the City. Final 'Submittal will include: Checked Bridge Plans, Structure Special Provisions, Marginal Estimate, Quantity Summary Sheets, Design Calculations, Independent Design Check Calculations, Quantity Calculations, and Quantity Check Calculations. This submittal will be made with the Final District Review submittal Prepare Final District PS&E Package (WBS 255) Final District PSE package will be the ",packaging of the final plans specifications for delivery of the agency responsible for letting the construction contract. DEA will oversee the compiling of the information and delivery on behalf of RCTC..Signed plans and specifications will be available at in electronic and final reproducible medium:(mylar or other). DEA anticipates as much as 200 plan sheets for final delivery. Stakeholder Communication Plan DEA has identified Arellano and associates as a consultant to provide appropriate communication efforts for the project at those points in time where it is necessary. For this scope of services, it is anticipated that at the time the project is ready for advertising, an information c program will be needed for property owners affected by the project construction as well as general information for the city and its residence. A specific, scope of work is not provided at this time as it will be more appropriate to develop this plan at the time the project is ready to advertise.Therefore,, a contingency' is set aside in the cost proposal for this effort and will be allocated at the time it is warranted. No action under this task will occur without direction and agreement between all parties. ; Prepare Construction Documents (WBS 260) DEA will prepare the final construction document and review for consistency prior to submittal to RCTC for reproduction for advertising. 44 " E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s f o r P S & E f o r t h e I - 2 1 5 / S R 7 4 I n t e r c h a n g e P r o j e c t i n t h e C i t y o f P e r r i s D a v i d E v a n s a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s P a g e 1 1 o f 1 1 A d v e r t i s e , O p e n B i d s , A w a r d & A p p r o v e . C o n t r a c t ( W B S 2 6 5 ) P r e p a r e R e s i d e n t s E n g i n e e r F i l e D E A w i l l p r o v i d e t o R C T C a R e s i d e n t ' s E n g i n e e r ( R E ) f i l e w h i c h s h a l l i n c l u d e : " 4 - S c a l e D r a w i n g o f t h e p r o p o s e d b r i d g e d e c k t o t h e f i n i s h e d g r a d e s a s s h o w n o n t h e p l a n s . D r a w i n g w i l l d e p i c t t h e c e n t e r l i n e l a y o u t f o r t h e b r i d g e a n d t h e g i r d e r s . " G r i d G r a d e s f o r i n t e r s e c t i o n s w h e r e p r o f i l e a n d g r a d e i n f o r m a t i o n m a y n o t b e s u f f i c i e n t f o r p r o p e r s t a k i n g o f t h e w o r k t o b e p e r f o r m e d . " U t i l i t y c o m p a n y c o r r e s p o n d e n c e a s m a y a f f e c t t h e p r o j e c t a l o n g w i t h a l i s t o f a l l c o n t a c t s t h a t h a v e b e e n m a d e t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o u r s e o f t h e p r o j e c t . " B a s k u p d a t a a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d f o r t h e W a t e r P o l l u t i o n C o n t r o l P r o g r a m a s m a y b e s h o w n o n t h e p r o j e c t p l a n s " . C o p i e s o f t h e q u a n t i t y c a l c u l a t i o n s f o r t h e p r o j e c t b i d i t e m s a s u s e d i n t h e p r o j e c t b i d s h e e t f o r a w a r d i n g t h e p r o j e c t . " C o p i e s o f t h e g e o t e c h n i c a l r e p o r t s f o r u s e b y t h e R E . R e v i e w o f C o n t r a c t o r S u b m i t t a l s D E A s h a l l b e a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e r e v i e w o f t h o s e s u b m i t t a l s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d i n t h e p r o j e c t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s a n d o r a s m a y b e i n i t i a t e d b y _ t h e c o n t r a c t o r . . T h e s e r e v i e w s w i l l b e f o r : i t e m s s u c h : a s : : " C h e c k i n g f o r c o n f o r m i t y t o t h e p r o j e c t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s f o r i t e m s w h e r e t h e R E o r C o n s t r u c t i o n s t a f f r e q u i r e d e s i g n s t a f f r e v i e w . " R e v i e w o f s p e c i a l t y d e s i g n i t e m s t o a s s u r e t h e y m e e t t h e i n t e n d e d p e r f o r m a n c e s p e c i f i c a t i o n f o r t h e p r o j e c t . + : R e v i e w o f s h o p d r a w i n g s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d f o r t h e b r i d g e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d a s n o t e d i n t h e c o n t r a c t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s . " R e v i e w o f C o n t r a c t o r i n i t i a t e d C o s t R e d u c t i o n I n c e n t i v e P r o p o s a l s ( G R I P ) w h e r e t h e c o n t r a c t o r p r o p o s e a l t e r t h e d e s i g n f o r a r e d u c t i o n i n p r i c e t o t h e p r o j e c t b u t s t i l l p r o v i d e t h e i n t e n d e d p e r f o r m a n c e a n d a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e e l e m e n t f o r w h i c h t h e C R I P i s a p p l i c a b l e , e i t h e r i n p a r t o r i n w h o l e t o t h e p r o j e c t . T h e s e i t e m s a r e n o t - l i m i t e d t o t h e i t e m s n o t e d h e r e . T h e e s t i m a t e d b u d g e t f o r t h e s e t a s k s a r e c o n t i n g e n t a r e t h e n u m b e r o f s u b m i t t a l s t h e c o n t r a c t o r m a k e s . T h e b u d g e t f o r t h i s t a s k w i l l n e e d t o b e e v a l u a t e d d u r i n g t h e p r o c e s s o f t h e w o r k i n c o n s t r u c t i o n . D E A w i l l m a k e i t s e l f a v a i l a b l e f o r m e e t i n g w i t h t h e c o n t r a c t o r a s t h e b u d g e t f o r t h i s t a s k w i l l a l l o w . P r e p a r e F i n a l R e p o r t ( W B S 2 9 5 ) D E A w i l l p r e p a r e t h e r e q u i r e d A s - B u i l t P l a n s u n d e r t h i s t a s k . T h i s t a s k i s l i m i t e d t o t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h e a s b u i l t p l a n s a s n o t e d o n t h e c o s t p r o p o s a l . T h e a s b u i l t p l a n s w i l l b e p r e p a r e d b a s e d o n t h e R C T C s u p p l i e d r e d l i n e d r a w i n g s f r o m t h e f i e l d r e v i s i o n s n o t e d d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n . T h e a s - b u i l t s w i l l b e p r e p a r e d o n t h e o r i g i n a l e l e c t r o n i c d r a w i n g s a n d w i l l r e t a i n t h e o r i g i n a l i n f o r m a t i o n . I t e m s n o t e d . a s s t r i c k e n w i l l b e s t r i c k e n a n d t h e n e w i n f o r m a t i o n a d d e d t o t h e p l a n s . T h e o r i g i n a l R E s e a l w i l l b e r e t a i n e d . S i g n a t u r e o n t h e n e w e l e c t r o n i c ; d r a w i n g f o r t h e a s b u i l t s w i l l b e p r o v i d e d b y t h e f i e l d p e r s o n n e l r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e r e d l i n e d r a w i n g s , t h e D E A e n g i n e e r i n r e s p o n s i b l e c h a r g e f o r r e v i e w i n g t h e a s b u i l t s , a n d t h e D E A i n d i v i d u a l s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r p r e p a r i n g t h e r e v i s i o n s . 4 5 Cost Proposal for the SR-74/I-215 I/C Plans, Specifications, and Estimate DAV1D EVA►NS AND ASSOCIATES INC. 3. ..y xc!.Y**#r aii:0"�:n, k:k . ;<„ t k'• r 100 20 Project Classifications Principal Manager / QC Average Direct Hourly Rate by classification er.pf.Hours.per .:;' Prof. Engineer Assistant Civil Engineer Civil CAD Prof. Bridge Bridge Bridge CAD Drafter Engineer Designer Drafter Prof. Landscape Architect Landscape Prof. Land Survey Designer Surveyor Analyst 3-Man Survey Clerical Crew $80 $75 $65 $40 $32 $75 $40 $28 $48 $32 $55 $30 $105 $25 111111111111111111111111111 DEA Roll Up 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Subconsultants Project Management PS&E'Phase 100. 20 .05 Project Management and Coordination :185. 20 . 10 PDT Meetings 185. 20 . 15 Coordination Meetings -.185.20 .20:. Project Schedule 185. 20 .25 _ Progress Reports and Invoices _185 . 20 : 30 • -Quality-Assurance Program ifalistPROAROIMEOAPSANDMANISH 185. 05 . Review and Update Project Information 185.. 10 Perform Design Surveys and Photogrammetric Mapping 185. 10 .05 Perform Control Surveys for Design 185. 10 . 15 Perform Design Data Surveys - 185 :.10 . 20 • ..:Perform Pavement Elevation -Surveys 185. 15 Perform Preliminary Design 185. 15 .05Perform Roadway and Misc. Design 185. 15 . 10 Review Proposed Geometries 185. 15 . 15 . • Prepare Request for Exceptions to Design Standards' -185 : 15 . 18 _ Prepare Conceptual LandscapePlan _4 8. 8, 8 8 8 8 24 36 64 100 12 12 12 32 12 22 20 52 28 16 16 40 216 $5,085 • $.13,076 $5,811- $3,390 . $3,390 $6,296 $26, 732 $100 $100 $100 $0 $0 . $.100 - $300 185. 20.. Prepare Engineering Reports 185. 20 10 Prepare Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports 186. 20 . 12 Prepare Storm Water Data Report 185. 20•'. 15. Prepare Geotechnical Design Report 185. 20 . 20 Prepare Pavement Design Report 185. 20 . 25 'Prepare Materials Report 185. 20 . 35 Review/Update TMP for Design Phase 185. 25 Determine Right of Way Requirements 185. 25 : 05 Review Project With Affected Agencies 185. 25 . 10 Determine Fee and Easer ienfRequirements 185: 25 .15 190. 3 Prepare Right of WaY Requirements Maps f3 t M. •���"R1�G'1•l"iFll�<����?!��l•S•`"> �*: ': �f>;> =,.»e .:.. Prepare Site Plans for Bridges and Structures 11 17 4 4 4 4 12 .16 8 8 48 12 24 - 16 36 24 56 24 40 40 40 32 • 32:, 120 8 12. I • 16 -200:. 05, ._Perform Preliminary Utility Verification • 200. 10 x 'Determine Utility. Locations (Potholing) and Prepare ConflictMaps 200. 10 .05 Prepare.Notices and Obtain Agreements for Potholing 200. 10 10. Perform Potholing. 200. 10 .•15 Perform Utility Surveys . • - 200 : 10.. 20 Review for Conflicts after Utility Sury 200'. 10 25_ Prepare Utility Conflict Maps 200: 15:- 200 . 20 205. 05 . Utility Conflict Resolution.:- Im lement UtilityRelocation Plan �.y .. �....�. ,.......,.:... •�..,, „... Tom+. Determine Required Permits 205. 10 Obtain Permits ys` . 0 205`. 10 .30 Obtain Local Agency Concurrence/Permit 205. 10 : 40 Obtain: Waste.,Discharge-Permit (NPDES) 205 ._ 10 50- ' Obtain -Regional Water Quality Control Board Permit �401 I....._:.,< 110� 210. 01 Prepare PreliminaryStructures Design Data for Overcrossing 210:;01 . 10 (Perform•Structures Site Investigation 210. 01 . 15 ::Prepare Prelimina Structure Resort •'210". Of : 20 -Prepare Draft Foundation Plane Prepare Preliminary Structures.Foundation Report 215 01 Prepare Structure General Plarfs for Overcrossing 210. 01 :25 215. 01 05 Develop Preliminary Design 215. 01 10 Prepare Preliminary Plan Sheets 215. 01 . 15 Develop Preliminary Quantities 215. 01 .20 Perform Foundation Field Investigation 215. 01 .25 Prepare. Foundation Report and Log of Test Borings 215. 90 Prepare Structure General Plans for "Overall" Project 215. 90 .05 Develop Preliminary Estimates 215. 90 . 10 Approve Prelimina Plans T pe Selection/Strate Mt 220. 05 Retrace and Perpetuate Existing Land Net for RMf Acquisition 220. 05 .05 Perform Record Data Search 11 18 .24 13 8 8 8 20 4 24' 12. 60 2 16 42 20 12 188 12 1 of 3 8 16 4 2 2 8 12 12 24 12 4 200 48 112 40. 4 4 108 32 116 192 $18,039 $6,175 $908 $908 $908 $15,388 $6,780 $:16,841 $23,003 $200 $100 $0 $0 $0 $200 $100 $200 $200 58 48 48 $30,000 $25,000 $25,000 44 $6,441 $100 16 120 28 16 22 36 262 - 52 24 $16,114 $4,843 $2,664- .$5,781- $4,794 $29,832 $7,761. `$4,964 $3,269 $23,488 $2,361 $1,150 72 $8,669 $726 $200 $0 - $0 $100 $0 $300 $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 $0 Printed: 6/20/2007 Q 11:37 AM File:16.A2.MM.ATT2.SR-74 1-2151C PSE Consultant Award.xls / DEA . $25,000 $22,383 $15,000 Aft I D E'1 A N S ANDASSOCIATES 220. 05 . 10 Performland Net Recovery and Field Ties 220. 05 . 20 Perform -Monument Perpetuation Surveys 220. 05 .25 Prepare and File Perpetuation Documents 220. 10 220. 15 Prepare Land Netflap - Prepare'Right of Warr Maps 230. 05 Prepare Draft Roadway Plans 230. 05 .05 Prepare Title Sheet • 230. 05 . 10 Prepare Typical Cross Sections 230. 05 . 15 - Prepare Key Map and Line Index 230. 05 .20 Prepare Roadway Layouts 230. 05 .25 Prepare Profile and Superelevation Sheets 230. 05 .30 Prepare Construction Details 230. 05 .35 Prepare Contour GradingPlans 230 05 .40 Prepare Summary of Quantities Sheets 230. 05 .50 230. 05 .52 Prepare Retaining Wall Plans Prepare Sound Wall Plans 230. 05 .55 Select Standard Plans Cost Proposal for the SR-74/1-2151/C Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Project Prof. Assistant Classifications Principal Manager 1 Engineer Civil QC Engineer Civil CAD Prof. Bridge Bridge Bridge CA Drafter Engineer Designer Drafter Average Direct Hourly Rate by classification $80 $75 $65 $40 $32 230. 05 .60 Prepare Stage Construction and Detour Plans or Traffic Handling Plans 230. 05 .65 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 230. 10 Prepare Draft Highway Planting Plans 230. 10 .05 Prepare Highway Planting Plans 230. 10 . 15 Prepare Plant List 230. 10 . 20 Prepare Irrigation Plans 230. 10 .30 Prepare Irrigation Quantity Sheets 230. 15 Prepare Draft Traffic Plans 230 ..15 .05 Prepare Signing and Pavement Delineation Plans 230.. _15..'10 Prepare Construction Area Signs Plans 230. 15 . 15 Prepare Traffic Electrical Plans 230. 20 Prepare Transportation Management Plan (TMP) 230. 25 Prepare Draft Utility Plans 230. 30 - Prepare Draft Drainage Plans 230. 35 Prepare Draft Specifications 230. 35 .05 Develop Roadway Specifications 230. 35 . 10 230. 35 . 15 Develop Highway Planting Specifications Develop Traffic Specifications 230 35 .20 Develop Electrical Specifications 230 : 35 .25 Develop Utility Specifications 230. 35 .30 . - Develop Hydraulic Specifications 230. 35--. 35 Develop Water Pollution Control Specifications 230. 35 .40 - . Develop Erosion Control -Specifications 230. 40 Prepare Draft PS&E Quantities and Estimates 230. 40 .05 Calculate Roadway Quantities and Estimate 230. 40 . 10 Calculate Highway Planting Quantities and Estimate 230.. 40 . 15-Calculate Drainage Quantities and Estimate 230 40 .20 Calculate Traffic Quantities and Estimate 230. 40 .25 = Calculate Electrical Quantities and Estimate 230. 40 .30 Calculate Utility Quantities and Estimate 230. 4035 Calculate Water Pollution Control Quantities and Estimate, ' 230. 40 .40 Calculate Erosion Control Quantities and Estimate 230: 55 '.Incorporate Structures Draft PS & E 230 60 • Review and UpdatePro'ectlnformation for PS &E Packa 240. 01 Prepare Draft Structure PS&E for Overcrossing 240. 01 .05 Perform Design 240 .. 01 .10 Prepare Plan Sheets _ _ 240. 01' . 15 Check Design and Plan Sheets 240. 01• .20 . Prepare. Quantities 240. 85 Overall Draft PS&E Development 240 ..90 .. - Prepare Draft Structure PS&E for "Overall" Project 240. 90 . 15 Perform Foundation Review 240. 90 .20 Prepare Draft Specifications 240. 90 .25 - Prepare Estimate, 240 90 .30 - Review Draft Plans, Specifications, and Estimate 250. 10 Finalize Structures PS&E j' Packare 255. 05 Circulate &Review Draftbistrict PS&E Package r e 4 1 22 11 47 9 28 4 80 11 25 12 35 1 12 4 18 0 22 0 20 31 4 4 4 2 2 32 48 120 ; 100 360 64 320 700 100 72 8 64 12 4 4 2of3 Prof. Landscape Architect Landscape Prof, Land Survey Designer Surveyor Analyst 36 3-Man Survey Clerical Crew $55 $30 $105 $25 DEA Roll Up Subconsultants $10,896 58 $16,314 36 $4,480 184 $19,734 192 $20,340 7o<v 14 $2,113 76 $9,964 22 $2,984 516 $63,683 256 $33,052 320 $39,251 270 $33,627 118 $14,462 416 $50,002 280 $33,258 48 $7,276 276 $36,382 214 $26,769 304 $35,135 72 $9,177 488 $56,056 56 $7,046 0 - $0 88 $11,126 0 $0 44 $9,020 352 $44,457 616 $79,543 124 $19,916 60 $7,301 4 $908 4 $908 60 $9,504 40 46,477 36 $5,690 24 = $3,935 52 $6,138 24 $3,935 4 $908 24 $3,935 24 : ° °: $3,935 24 $3,935' . 20 $4,177 20 $4,177 8 462 $1.,816 $66,740 $113,049 $31,872 $11,036 $2,300 $3,723 $10,019 46 . $6,629 10 $2,270 154 8 $20,346 $100 $100 , $500 $300 $100 $400 $400 $100 $600 $100 $0 $100 $0.• 480 $100 $400 $28,000 $45,000 $0 20 $2,820 $0 20 $2,820 $0 101 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700 $1,100. $300 . $100 $0 $100 $100 $0 $1,283 $0 Printed: 6/20/2007 Q 11:37 AM File:16.A2.MM.ATT2.SR•74_I-215 IC PSE Consultant Award.xls / DEA $12,000 $12,000 Cost Proposal for the SR-74/I-215 I/C Plans, Specifications, and Estimate AND ASSOC FATES INC. Project Classifications Principal Manager / QC Prof. Engineer Average Direct Hourly Rate by classification $80 $75 $65 255. 10 Update PS&E Package 255. 10 05 Update Roadway PS&E 255. 10 . 10 Update Highway Planting PS&E 255. 10 . 15 Update Traffic PS&E 255. 10 . 20 Update Hydraulics PS&E 255. 10 .25 Update Technical Reports 255. 10 .30 Update Utility PS&E 255: 10 . 35 Update Electrical PS&E 255. 20 Prepare Final District PS&E Package 255. 20-. 10 Incorporate Final Structures Specifications and Estimate into Final District PS&E Stakeholder Communication (Arellano Associates) .. .,-.:';LT.�z"ai,9,.xxi:,:»»S�.S�'.."�'i'.".x,�F,�sbc?i«a�'cy; •w.'�`�3s£iaa Prepare Draft Contract Documents Total Project Sheet Count and Hours per sheet S 265. 25 Respond to Inquiries & Open Bids 1 270 . 05 Prepare Resident Engineer's File w 270 . 20 01 Review Shop Plans 270 . 20 . 01 Review Cost Reduction Incentive Proposals (GRIPS) 270 20:. -01_ _. Review -Contractors' Water Pollution Control Program , 29.5; 1 Prepare As=Built Plans Subtotal Hours by Classification Subtotal Direct Labor by Classification Subtotal Overhead Costs by Classification. Subtotal Fee b Classification Assistant Civil Engineer Bridge 8 Civil CAD Prof. Bridge Bridge CAD Prof. Drafter ' Engineer Designer Drafter Landscape Architect ur x r;.. 24 48 1202 1460 2274 2558 510 1272 1168 0.4% 9.1 % 11.1 % . 17.3% . 19.4% 3.9% 9.7% 8.9% $3,840 $90,150 $94,900 $90,960 $81,856 $38,250 $50,880 $32,704 $6,726 $157,907 $166,227 $159,326 _$143,379 $66,999 $89,121 $57,284 $1,057 $24,806 $26,113 $25,029 $22,523 $10,525. $14,000 $8,999 $11,623 $272,863 $287,240 $275,315 :. . $247,758 $115,774 • $154,001 $98,987 DEA Overhead Rate = 175:16% DEA Profit= 10% 8 4: Landscape Prof. Land Survey Designer Surveyor Analyst 12 3.3 8 60 3:Man Survey Clerical Crew $55 $30 $105 $25 8 ,�. ` •.tw,F�>•..,<„�? SL'<xxma.>� r.�_.^4x., :c.0 . xtfi.. . �,.,..�3'-r,*: �,�oss�'�..0 7.9% 0.9% 4.1 % $23,040 $33,280 $40,357 $58,293 $6,340 $9,157. $69,737 _. $100,730 $6,160 $16,200 $15,960 $8,400 $10,790 $28,376, $27,956 $14,713 $1,695 $4,458 $4,392 $2,311 $18,645 $49,034. $48,308 $25,424 DEA Roll Up 152 $19,517 136 $16,151 144 $17,943 56 $8,838 68 $9,407 0. $0 52 $7,337 $4, 298 20 ,. 72 $10,134 $0 $200 $200 $0 $200 $100 $100 ' $0 . $100 $0 $100 Subconsultants 60 $7,500 $12,000 $30,000 0 $0 . • $0 _ ,10�+`.�,»•xasF>.m�� ,.;:.�:�.: bs%mg:: gxs;: -,� E:^+e;,:,�-� , .<. i ;:sr n..4 4R.. s S ram;» . = • . ' a 172 $23,367 $200 250 • $39,778 158. $26,121 68 $10,606 392 $40,341 13152 $586,580 . $400 $300 $100 $1,027,454 $161,405 ., $1,775,439. $21,700 $294,523 TOTAL FEE _ $2,091,662 This cost proposal is submitted in response to RCM's request for the subject project. The supporting Scope of Work for this proposal will be provided upon request to negotiate for a contract to provide these services. This proposal is an estimate of the services 48 3of3 Richard A. Hart, PE Vice President Printed: 6/20/2007 © 11:37 AM File:16.A2.MM.ATT2.SR-74 1-215 IC PSE Consultant Award.xls / DEA " I D T a s k N a m e 1 N o t i c e t o P r o c e e d 2 P r o j e c t R e p o r t 3 D r a f t P r o j e c t R e p o r t 3 3 D e s i g n E x c e p t i o n R e p o r t s 3 9 G e o m e t r i c A p p r o v a l D r a w i n g 4 4 M o d i f i e d A c c e s s R e p o r t 5 7 E n v i r o n m e n t a l D o c u m e n t a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . S t u d i e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1 c a w % A p p r o v a l 1 0 3 W ' N E P A A p p r o v a l 1 1 1 1 1 2 F i n a l D e s i g n P h a s e 1 1 3 " N T P 1 1 4 P r e p a r e I n i t i a l 3 5 % P l a n S e t 1 1 5 P r e p a r e B r i d g e T y p e S e l e c t i o n R e p o r t 1 1 6 P r e p a r e C o p n c e p t u a l L a n d s c a p e P l a n 1 1 7 . P e r f o r m G e o t e c h n i c a l ` n v e g t i g a t i o n s f o r F o u n d a t i o n d e s 1 1 8 U p d a t e S t o r m W a t e r D a t a R e p o r t 1 1 9 P e r f o r m I n i t i a l D r a i n a g e L a y o u t s 1 2 0 S u b m i t 3 5 % P l a n s e t 1 2 1 ' C a f t a n s R e v i e w 1 2 2 P r e p a r e U n C h e c k e d B r i d g e P l a n s 1 2 3 . P r e p a r e c o m p l e t e . P l a n S e t P a c k a g e 1 2 4 P r e p a r e T r a f f i c P l a n s 1 2 5 P r e p a r e l a n d s c a p e P l a n s . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 6 R e v i s e H i g h w a y P l a n s 1 2 7 P r e p a r e E l e c t r i C i i P 1 8 n S 1 2 8 P r e p a r e R e t a i n i n g a n d S o u n d W a l l P l a n s " 1 2 9 R e v i s e R e p o r t s f r o m 3 5 � k S u b m i t t a l 1 3 0 S u b m i t 6 5 % P l a n S e t 1 3 1 C a l t r a n s R e v i e w 1 3 2 P e r f o r m B r i d g e I n d e p e n d e t P l a n C h e c k 1 3 S R e v i s e P l a n s f o r 9 5 % S u b m i t t a l 1 3 4 P r e p a r e D r a f t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s 1 3 5 P r e p a r e d r a f t - b i d l i s t o f r c o n s t r u c t i o n 1 3 6 U p d a t e E n g i n e e r s E s t i m a t e f o r 9 5 % P S E 1 3 7 S u b m i t 9 5 % P S E 1 3 8 R e v i s e f o r F i n a l S u b m i t t a l 1 3 9 F i n a l S u b m i t t a l 1 4 0 C o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e E A 4 6 4 2 0 D a v i d E v a n s & A s s o c i a t e s T a s k S p l i t P r o g r e s s 9 / 3 4 ) k i w i t k x - Y �� . 1 3 1 5 1 . . I n t e r s t a t e 2 1 5 / S t a t e R o u t e 7 4 I n t e r c h a n g e P A & E D P h a s e D e c M i l e s t o n e S u m m a r y P r o j e c t S u m m a r y 2 0 0 8 J a n l F e b M a r ��7 1 " A r , j . _ , M a 4 _ J u n , . . 1 _ J u l A u 2 _ , . L S e p j O c t E x t e r n a l T a s k s E x t e r n a l M i l e s t o n e D e a d l i n e W I , a i . a R a t + d i t A 1 v 1 0 / 3 0 2 0 0 9 D e c J a n P 4 , n 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 25, 2007 TO Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: John Standiford, Public Affairs Director THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update STAFF RECONIMENDATION; This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the following bill position: H.R. 2701 MONITOR; 2) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: While the beginning of California's fiscal year is on July 1', the 'State Constitution actually sets a deadline of June 15th for the Legislature to approve a budget. The budget needs to be approved by a 2/3rds vote of the Legislature and is then sent to the Governor for his signature. While June 15th is constitutionally -mandated, it seems as if getting. the whole thing done by July 1" is the real working deadline. George 'Deukmejian was in the state house the last time the Legislature approved a budget by June 15tn The question now is whether or not a budget will be passed by July 1st. The Governor issued his May revise of the budget, which culminated in a proposed budget of $103.8 billion. This reflected an $800 million downturn in state revenue, :yet Democrats have pushed for more spending with the approval of a variety of bills. At this point, it appears as if Assembly Republicans are standing firm in support of. the Governor's budget. Republican Leader Mike Villines has indicated that the various sides on thebudget are far apart. The discussion is important in that funding levels for various programs will need to be set through the budget including bond -funded programs such as Proposition 1'B. The next major funding category to be considered on Proposition 1 B involves goods Agenda Item 17 50 movement. As part of that consideration the Inland Empire Caucus invited Commission staff, and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to meet_ with the Caucus on June 13t' regarding the issue and specifically the Colton Crossing. The meeting was also attended by railroad executives from Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Union Pacific railroads. Stephanie Wiggins from Commission staff provided an informative overview of the Commission Grade Separation Strategy that was well -received by members of the Caucus. Federal Update President George Bush was the first President since John Quincy Adams to go through an entire term without vetoing a bill. This took place during his first term of office and reflected the one -party control of both Congress and the VVhite House. During his second term, he has vetoed two bills and it appears as if he is ready to veto the vast majority of spending bills that are expected to come across his desk for the rest of this year. The first bill to receive a veto will be the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill that raises spending by 14 percent over last year. While he is expected to .sign the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Bill, many observers believe that he will veto spending bills for Labor, Health and Human , Services (HHS) 'Education; Transportation and Housing and Urban ' Development (HUD), ,! Commerce, Justice and Science; Agriculture and Rural Development; State and ForeignOperations and Defense. All of these bills are .currently being "marked -up" including the HUD Appropriations. Bill.. The House_ subcommittee responsible for .transportation appropriations ` has approved its $50.7 billion spending bill for FY 2007/08, which includes $40.2 billion for highways. Due to Appropriations Chairman David Obey's (D-WI) pledge to keep earmarks out of all appropriations bills until theyreachConference Committee later this year, at this time there are no specific :transportation projects identified far funding.. The committee, however, is operating with, the budget: blueprint adopted by both chambers last month, which fully funds transportation according to Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A :Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) - despite the President's proposed funding levels that are significantly lower. Among the national topics of -debate dominating the halls of Congress is the issue Of climate change and our nation's energy policy. Based on early developments in both. the House and Senate it appears that transportation will bea component of the Democrat's climatechange and energy package .that will take shape over the summer. The . House Transportation & Infrastructure. Committee, chaired by Representative Jim Oberstar (D-MN), will spend the next few weeks working on Agenda Item 17 51 " H . R . 2 7 0 1 , t h e " T r a n s p o r t a t i o n E n e r g y S e c u r i t y a n d C l i m a t e C h a n g e M i t i g a t i o n A c t o f 2 0 0 7 . " T h e c o m m i t t e e i s s e e k i n g t o i m p l e m e n t p o l i c y t h a t c a p t u r e s t h e n e x u s b e t w e e n t r a n s p o r t a t i o n , e n e r g y c o n s u m p t i o n , a n d e m i s s i o n s t o p r o m o t e m o r e e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y f r i e n d l y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n . A s c u r r e n t l y d r a f t e d , t h e b i l l c o n t a i n s s e v e r a l s e c t i o n s o f i n t e r e s t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n : " G r a n t s t o i m p r o v e p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s e r v i c e s : A n a d d i t i o n a l $ 7 5 0 m i l l i o n w o u l d b e a u t h o r i z e d t o t h e u r b a n i z e d a r e a f o r m u l a p r o g r a m f o r t r a n s i t c a p i t a l a n d o p e r a t i o n s f o r F Y 2 0 0 7 / 0 8 a n d F Y 2 0 0 8 / 0 9 . T h e s e f u n d s w o u l d b e t a r g e t e d t o r e d u c i n g f a r e s o r e x p a n d i n g t r a n s i t s e r v i c e . " C o m m u t e r r a i l t r a n s i t e n h a n c e m e n t : T h e b i l l e s t a b l i s h e s a n . a d j u d i c a t i o n p r o c e s s b y w h i c h a p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a u t h o r i t y o r . p r i v a t e r a i l c a r r i e r c a n a p p l y t o t h e S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n B o a r d f o r t h i r d - p a r t y i n t e r v e n t i o n o n s t a l l e d n e g o t i a t i o n s o v e r t r a c k a g e r i g h t s o r u s e s o f r i g h t s - o f - w a y . I n c r e a s e d f e d e r a l s h a r e f o r C o n g e s t i o n M i t i g a t i o n a n d A i r Q u a l i t y ' ( C M A Q ) p r o j e c t s : f o r C M A Q p r o j e c t s w i t h f u n d s o b l i g a t e d i n F Y 2 0 0 8 o r 2 0 0 9 , t h e f e d e r a l s h a r e o f t h e p r o j e c t c o s t i n c r e a s e s t o 1 0 0 % , e l i m i n a t i n g t h e : n o n - - f e d e r a l ' m a t c h i n g r e q u i r e m e n t . " G r e e n l o c o m o t i v e g r a n t p r o g r a m : T h e b i l l a u t h o r i z e s $ 5 0 m i l l i o n f o r e a c h f i s c a l y e a r t h r o u g h 2 0 1 1 f o r p u b l i c o r p r i v a t e e n t i t i e s t o p u r c h a s e o r . r e c o n d i t i o n l o c o m o t i v e s w h i c h m e e t o r e x c e e d E P A ' s e m i s s i o n s t a n d a r d s . H . R . 2 7 0 1 a l s o c r e a t e s a n i n i t i a t i v e t o p r o m o t e s h o r t s e a s h i p p i n g , w h i c h c o u l d r e d u c e t h e n u m b e r o f c o n t a i n e r s t r a v e l i n g b y t r u c k a n d t r a i n t h r o u g h S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a . T h e b i l l a l s o c r e a t e s a " G r e e n P o r t s I n i t i a t i v e " t h a t e n c o u r a g e s e m i s s i o n s r e d u c t i o n s f r o m p o r t v e h i c l e s a n d e q u i p m e n t . T h e b i l l i s l i k e l y t o b e m o d i f i e d a n d m e l d e d w i t h o t h e r p r o p o s a l s a s i t n a v i g a t e s t h e f l o o r o f t h e H o u s e a n d m e e t s w i t h c o n c u r r e n t S e n a t e l e g i s l a t i o n . D u e t o t h e p r o g r a m s o f i n t e r e s t i n t h e b i l l a n d t h e e a r l y s t a g e s o f p o l i c y d e v e l o p m e n t , s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h e C o m m i s s i o n a d o p t a M O N I T O R p o s i t i o n o n H . R . 2 7 0 1 . A t t a c h m e n t : L e g i s l a t i v e . M a t r i x A g e n d a I t e m 1 7 5 2 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N - P O S I T f ��N S O N S T A T E A N D F E D E R A L L E G I S L A T I " , . . f b . f + �� . : b s a t : . . - . . . . . , 5 . . . . . . . . : t ; . . . r , . . . . . . . : S ' : ' . . . . . . . 5 ; ; . : . 4 ` ��. . ; �� , . 3 , . . ! 1 , . ��" p , r ��. S ; h X , . . a , �� . _ . r n . . < . , : . . . , . . 1 . ��i ` - t ' . > . ��, , J 4 . . , . . , . . . r . . . , ��% . " ��- . . . . . r h Y , . , T - - . , n t a X ��, : . . . _ . , i t i . f . . C . . . �� . ��: ��. . . . . " > P . G v . , . . . . s . a ; U : . T . r . - . t . �� a . . w . a l - e i � i + ' t t . . . . ��' t . , f . . . . , . : . . * : S . . ��, . . . . . c - ��: t a i 6 1 . a . , . . . ^ . " : y . . ������, t i " - a : , , . . . . v 1 i . ' ��2 T 1 6 . . T . { w { . t w r w . - F . Y ' , �� . �� r . . . w i r 3 . . . ��+ . ��. . . , . . g . . . . . . . , 7 l . , ; i # , ' ����. ��������y . ��J , ? $ _ _ " 5 : . . r r e ��x f F , ��? . ��; . . - . . . t ' y } . . . _ , . , . . j m o w . , r , a . . N , . . ��, , . ! a . ' t t , t ��. . s . . : . , ( ; k n + ��, , . . . . . . K . �� t r ' 3 " . , 9 . . . . . . . ? S t . . . . . 3 - o - . : : ��, . . . . a . . . : r ; . . . v - . , . . . . _ f r . . : : , L 7 4 J . ��% : r � � ' �� e ' T d N , ` ��' ( , > - S . r ��F , . . . . . f . . . �� a c n , . r t i . e . ��a - . . _ . . . . . , , i . , , . ��" ' . . . _ . ��, I �� . . , . p ��k , " r R - . s Y + v + w t a - �� �� . a . : 3 . . . . . . . a . . y * , . r . . r . . i . . , , - . . - . : . . . . > s r y , ~ . . ' . " f . I M y M r , ��' . . : a ��. , , . . r , , . , . . n 4 . ��" ��4 r y 4 - : . . r . �� : v K a r . . J . . , , . 1 5 . . f . , . . . , d ��. a . , . . . - . , , U . . : + F * . ( ��N , : s : . : ��b + . g : . : , - - . , . �� T . h . . r w 1 r . . . . i - t ' - Y ' , . : - i . . - . ��. . c . r ��. . . t . , �� . : k . . 1 . ' t 1 ' W : - ' ��T . . v _ , . . . , . t , . . . . . , . 2 r . , , . , . . . , . . . . . . } r . Y . b . r r , ��1 { . . . . . . k ' f . . . . , r , . . . . F 3 f i r - . J . , _ a a . ��: - �� . . . . . . . . ! - . a . t : ` . f �� . . . : . , . , . , : T i r x - . , r F n ? 2 ��, e . . - d . . . . . . . > . . . . . ��S , � r . - , " . i s . . t t S " . , ��. �� i � a + . w s a . L , i , s . . , , . . , r : " " R . , r . 2 . Y . i , ���� ' 1 a : ' ' . . : i . . 1 ' ; , ' ' w ` ��. . , f i t ' , ��' �� . . ��. ��. g 3 ' d . , f , . ��, 4 , ��" . . , ` . N } x , �� , U - . . ��' ^ ��. ��. . . �� . . . r �� . a , ' , " ��` . . . �� - . . ' �� s . a ' ��. , , y G 0 , �� 0 . ) ' 4 t M " � } i �� , . . . t , � 4 A . , + ? c , , t F , k �� ' ? A . . , } ' , ' ; T i , - f r �� ` �� . 7 4 ��' a �� p n ' 7 r u r . . . I t + Q / C . T . ? . ' S : ; ��. r " ^ w ' " . . . . r A z ��' d ` 2 . . . . �� . . . i w . = . . a , _ . t . . k . % , t w . . . . , r ��b Y . . . . \ A f t . ; Y " i C ` : R . ��, . . _ . . , 7 . . - . . C ' : . . . . t X s . . a , ' , . . . ' ' , i r Y . : . " k . . , . , . , . ! ' y ` , y 3 , S T A T E L E G / S L A T I O N A B 2 9 1 ( J e f f r i e s & B e n o i t ) T h i s b i l l r e l i n q u i s h e s s t a t e c o n t r o l o f t h e , p o r t i o n s o f S R 7 4 w i t h i n . L a k e ' E l s i n o r e c i t y l i m i t s t o t h e C i t y L a k e E l s i n o r e , . _ I n S e n a t e , r e f e r r e d t o C o m m i t t e e o n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n & H o . u s i n s _ - 6 / 1 4 / 0 7 S u p p o r t 0 4 / 1 . 1 / 0 7 A B 1 2 4 0 ( B e n o i t ) T h i s b i l l a u t h o r i z e s t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ( R C T C ) t o u s e d e s i g n - b u i l d c o n t r a c t i n g i n t h e d e l i v e r y o f t h e P e r r i s V a l l e y L i n e M e t r o l i n k E x t e n s i o n : H e a r i n g c a n c e l l e d a t r e q u e s t o f a u t h o r . T w o - y e a r b i l l . S u p p o r t r 0 4 / 1 1 / 0 7 A B 1 3 5 1 ( L e v i n e ) T h i s b i l l e s t a b l i s h e s g u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e e x p e n d i t u r e o f t h e . $ 1 b i l l i o n o f S t a t e - L o c a l P a r t n e r s h i p F u n d i n g i n P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B . , T h e b i l l . i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e i n t e n t " o f P r o p . 1 B i n s u p p o r t i n g s e l f - h e l p c o u n t i e s , s u c h a s R i v e r s i d e , . m a t c h s a l e s t a x d o l l a r s w i t h s t a t e d o l l a r s I n S e n a t e , r e a d f i r s t t i m e . R e f e r r e d t o R u l e s C o m m i t t e e f o r a s s i g n m e n t 0 6 / 0 7 / 0 7 S u p p o r t 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 7 A J R 1 4 ( J e f f r i e s ) T h i s j o i n t r e s o l u t i o n c a l l s o n t h e P r e s i d e n t o f t h e U . S . a n d C o n g r e s s . t o e n a c t f e d e r a l l e g i s l a t i o n t h a t e n s u r e s a s u b s t a n t i a l i n c r e m e n t o f n e w r e v e n u e s f r o m c u s t o m s d u t i e s a n d i m p o r t a t i o n f e e s i s d e d i c a t e d t o g o o d s m o v e m e n t p r o j e c t s i n C a l i f o r n i a : a n d o t h e r i m p a c t e d s t a t e s . A d o p t e d b y S e n a t e B u s i n e s s , P r o f e s s i o n s a n d E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t C o m m i t t e e 0 6 / 1 2 / 0 7 S u p p o r t 0 4 / 1 1 / 0 7 S B 9 ( L o w e n t h a l ) T h i s b i l l w i l l b e a v e h i c l e f o r e s t a b l i s h i n g a p r o c e s s f o r t h e . s e l e c t i o n o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t s t o b e f u n d e d f r o m t h e T r a d e C o r r i d o r s I m p r o v e m e n t F u n d ( T C I F ) o f P r o p o s i t i o n 1 6 . T h e T C I F i s a $ 2 b i l l i o n f u n d . I n A s s e m b l y , r e a d f i r s t t i m e . H e l d a t d e s k , 0 6 / 0 7 / 0 7 M o n i t o r 0 1 / 1 0 / 0 7 S B 1 9 ( L o w e n t h a l ) T h i s b i l l . w i l l b e a v e h i c l e f o r e s t a b l i s h i n g c o n d i t i o n s a n d c r i t e r i a f o r p r o j e c t s t o b e f u n d e d u n d e r t h e $ 1 b i l l i o n a c c o u n t c r e a t e d b y P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B d e d i c a t e d t o r e d u c i n g e m i s s i o n s r e l a t e d t o g o o d s m o v e m e n t , R e f e r r e d t o A s s e m b l y C o m m i t t e e o n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 0 6 / 0 7 / 0 7 M o n i t o r 0 1 / 1 0 / 0 7 S B 4 5 ( P e r a t a ) T h i s b i l l w i l l e s t a b l i s h t h e a p p l i c a t i o n p r o c e s s f o r a l l o c a t i o n s f r o m t h e T r a n s i t S y s t e m S a f e t y , S e c u r i t y , a n d D i s a s t e r R e s p o n s e A c c o u n t f r o m P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B . I n A s s e m b l y , r e a d f i r s t t i m e . H e l d a t d e s k . 0 6 / 0 7 / 0 7 M o n i t o r 0 1 / 1 0 / 0 7 ery' 4 _,',L....,..t..r„ N.. ..n.r.x .>:-i•>.:,:.:.2>.s..y..#t.. . .._....,� N..®..{, :.._r...y:,,X.._.'.... .,9.i.�. ...:. ..'•rr.w..,.. ' n Sw.r�i2.. ..,,;c...:h. ��pp ,_ , .` 4"7" w _ i.,.P;a f t �Z .^,+, 9 js..i, e Dh.,L .,.''J... DOy x+ K•. �a ~ ® SB 47 (Perata) This bill •will establish the eligibility, matching fund requirements, and application process for Proposition 1 B funds under the $1 billion State -Local Partnership _ Program. The State -Local Partnership Program is to e a ministere y the . California Transportation Commission (CTC). : Referred to Rules Committee - 01 /18/07 - - Monitor 01 /10/07 SB 53 (Duchen ) y This bill requires Caltrans tq establish performance measures that will allow the department to issue an annual rating of the overall quality of the state highway system. Caltrans would be required to report to the Legislature on how resource, staffing, and programming decisions impact the overall condition of the state highway system (in terms of distressed lane miles, bridge conditions, and life cycle costs). SB 53 would require Caltrans to consult with agencies such as RCTC in developing its performance measures: In Assembly, read first time. Held at desk.- 06/07/07 ` Support 2/14/07 SB 56 (Runner) This bill establishes a 10-year pilot program for design -build projects, P� 9 P 1 administered by the CTC. Held in Senate Appropriations Committee under submission - 06/01/07 Support 2/14/07 SB 224 (Battin) This bill relinquishes state control of SR-1 1 1 and SR-79 to local jurisdictions. SR-1 1 1 is relinquished within the city limits of La Quinta, Indian Wells, Indio, and Palm Desert, SR-79 is relinquished within the city limits of Temecula,,San Jacinto and Hemet. Referred to Assembly Committee on Transportation - 06/11 /07 Support 04/1 1 /07 SB 375 (Steinberg) This bill . would would require regional transportation planning agencies to adopt "preferred growth scenarios" that reduce vehicle miles traveled per household. The amount of reduced vehicle miles traveledto be reduced would be part of, an emissions inventory to be completed, by CARB. Additional provisions would require the CTC to adopt guidelines for the use of travel demand models that meet a number of standards and would require the state to ensure that projects that are included in the Federal. Transportation Improvement, Program reflect this orientation toward "preferred growth scenarios." In Assembly, read first time. Held at desk. - 06/07/07 Oppose 06/13/07 SB 748. (Corbett) `„ - This bill establishes the criteria for the State -Local Partnership programcreated when voters approved Proposition-1 B. The bill broadly defines agencies who may apply for funding from the program and also broadly. includes voter-approvedtaxes as eligible =matching -funds __ _ r.- - _: -.. <-. ;: . In Assembly, read first time: Held at desk. - 06/07/07 Oppose Unless Amended 06/13/07 SB 872 This bill establishes the criteria for the State -Local Partnership Held in Senate Appropriations (Ackerman) program created when voters approved Proposition 1 B. The bill Committee under submission - allocates $200 million per year statewide over five FY's beginning FY 05/31 /07 1.0-1 1. Funding goes only to self-help counties and to projects with a minimum cost of $ 25 million. Support 04/1 1 /07 FEDERAL LEGISLATION H.R. 1475 (McGovern, D- MA) This bill equalizes the fringe benefit employers may offer their employees tax-free for transit reimbursement and parking reimbursement to $200/month. Presently, employers may reimburse parking up to. $175/month while transit may only be reimbursed up to $100/month, Referred to House Ways & Means .Committee; Referred to House Oversight and Government Reform Committee -� 03/12./07 Support 04/1 1 /07 H.R. 2701- (Oberstar, D MN) . This bill provides addresses ways that transportation policy can help mitigate climate change and improve energy efficiency. The bill includes additional transit funding and an.,increased federal share of CMAQ projects. A new mechanism for negotiating with railroads is also part of the legislation 55 Markup scheduled in Transportation & Infrastructure Committee for 06/20/07 MONITOR Pending Commission Approval