HomeMy Public PortalAbout08 August 21, 2007 Citizens Advisory Committee / Social Services Transportation Advisory Council81418
RECORDS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE/
SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL
TIME: 11:30 A.M.
DATE: August 21, 2007
LOCATION: County of Riverside Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, Riverside
Conference. Room';A
*** COMMITTEE MEMBERS ***
Andrea Puga, Corona, Chairman
Mary Venerable, Office of Supervisor Buster, County of Riverside, Vice Chairman
Michelle Anglin, City of Norco
Peter Benavidez, Blindness Support Services, Riverside
Jim Collins, Include Me, Inc., Indio
Eunice Lovi, SunLine Transit Agency, Thousand Palms
Fortunato Penilla, Retired Citizen
, Scott Richardson, Riverside Transit Agency, Riverside
Cindy Scheirer, Office of Supervisor Tavaglione, County of Riverside
Sherry Thibodeaux, Community Access Center, Riverside
*** STAFF ***
Tanya Love, Program Manager
11.36.10
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CITIZENS ADVISORY CONIMITTFE/
SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL
www.rctc.org
AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda
11:30:A.M.
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501
Conference Room A
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section
54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please
contact the Clerk of the Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours
prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made
to provide accessibility at the meeting.
PLEASE NOTE: The Chairperson of the CAC/SSTAC kindly
requests that cell phones be turned off during the meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add an item to the Agenda
after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the
item and that the item came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to
the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires
2/3 vote of the Committee. If there are less than 2/3 of the Committee
members present, . adding an item to the .agenda requires a unanimous vote.
Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.)
Citizens Advisory Committee/
Social Services Transportation Advisory Council
August 21, 2007
Page 2
6. TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDITS
Overview
This itern is for the CAC/SSTAC to receive, as an informational item, the
presentation on the FY 2003/04 through FY 2005/06 Triennial Performance
Audit for the Commission and public transit operators.
7. COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT -HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
Overview
This item is for the CAC/SSTAC to receive, as in informational item, the°
presentation on the Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services
Transportation Plan for Riverside County.
8. TRANSIT. VISIONING STATUS REPORT
Overview
This item is, for the CAC/SSTAC to receive and file the staff report on the
transit visioning process.
9. COMMITTEE. MEMBER COMMENTS AND INFORMATION
Overview
This item provides the opportunity for the Committee Members and staff to
report on attended and upcoming meetings/conferences and issues related to
Committee activities.
10. ADJOURNMENT
The next Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services. Transportation
Advisory Councilmeeting is scheduled to be held at 1 1 :30„A.M.; Tuesday,
February 12, 2008, • Riverside County Transportation Commission, • County
Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 3rd Floor,
Conference Room A.
MINUTES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE/
SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL
Minutes
May 15, 2007
CALL TO ORDER
Vice Chair Mary Venerable called the - Citizens Advisory Committee/Social
Services Transportation Advisory Council to order- at 1 1:40 A.M. at the
Riverside County Transportation Commission Offices, 4080 Lennon Street,
Riverside, California 92501, 3rd Floor, Conference Room A.
2. ROLL CALL .
Members Present
Michelle Anglin
Jim Collins
Eunice Lovi
Fortunato Penilla
Scott.Richardson
Cindy Scheirer
Mary Venerable
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
Members Absent
Peter Benavid,ez
Andrea Puga
Sherry Thibodeaux
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/S/C to approve the February 13, 2007 Minutes.
5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS
There were no additions/revisions to the agenda.
6. PALO VERDEVALLEY FY 2007/08 UNMET TRANSIT NEEDS HEARING
Tanya Love, ROTC, stated that State law requires that prior to making any
allocations of Local Transportation Funds (LTF) not directly related to public
transit, the Commission must identify the unmet transit needs in the area and
determine those that are reasonable to meet. At least one public hearing must
be held to solicit comments on unmet transit needs. The only area where this
Citizens Advisory Committee
Social Services Transportation Advisory Council
May 15, 2007
Pa9e 2
determination of unmet needs is applicable is the Palo Verde Valley where in
prior years not all funds have been needed for transit. In the Western County
and Coachella Valley, all available local transit funds are being used for transit
service. For FY 2007/08, Commission staff projects a total of $1,115,589 in
available LTF funds for transit services; of that amount, transit staff has
identified the use of approximately $926,616 towards operating and capital
costs.
The Commission held a public hearing in Blythe on March 1 2007.
Commissioners Joseph DeConinck, Charles Grotke, Terry Henderson and Roy
Wilson and Les. Nelson, City Manager, City of Blythe and General Manager, Palo
Verde Valley Transit Agency acted as the hearing board. Notice. of the hearing
was advertised in the Desert Sun, Palo Verde Valley Times and the Riverside
Press Enterprise. Notices of the hearing were delivered and posted at the Blythe
Police Department, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency Office, City of Blythe
Administrative Offices, Palo Verde College and the Riverside County Department
of Public Social Services. Flyers in both English and Spanish were posted on
the transit vehicles and made available to the riders. One person testified at the
hearing and requested fixed route deviations without the need :for a notice. No
written statements were received regarding transit service need's in the area.
Ms. Love further stated that as a result of the testimony, on March 5, 2007
Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency implemented an operations policy to accept
deviations from passengers on the bus.
M/S/C to reaffirm the Commission's definition of "Unmet Transit Needs"
and "Reasonable to Meet" standards; make a finding that based upon a
review of the requests for services received through the "Unmet Transit
Needs Hearing" process, there are no unmet transit needs which can be
reasonably met in the Palo Verde Valley and forward to the Commission
for review and final action.
FY 2007/08 -: FY 2009/10 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS
Tanya Love, ROTC, provided background information regarding the Short Range
Transit Plans that cover the three apportionment areas of the county and are
comprised of plans for the municipal operators, the Palo Verde Valley Transit
Citizens Advisory Committee!
Social Services Transportation Advisory Council
May 15, 2007
Page 3
Agency, the Riverside Transit Agency, SunLine Transit Agency, and the
Commission's Regional Commuter Rail program.
Agency representatives provided overviews of activities related to their specific
programs and responded to various questions.
8. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS AND INFORMATION
Mary Venerable announced the May 17, 2007 "Roadmap for Coordinated
Transportation Innovations" conference at the Morongo Casino Resort and Spa.
9. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Citizens Advisory
Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Council, the meeting
adjourned at 2:17 P.M. The next meeting was scheduled for August 14, 2007
but due to schedule conflicts, it has been changed to August 21, 2007, 1 1:30
A.M., at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, Conference Room A,
3rd Floor, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside 92501.
Respectfully submitted,
6-yu
Tanya
Program Manager
AGENDA ITEM 6
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
August 21, 2007
TO:;
Citizens. Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation.
Advisory Council
FROM:
Tanya Love, Program Manager
THROUGH
Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director
SUBJECT:
Triennial Performance Audits
STAFF RECOMMENDATION;
This item is for the CAC/SSTAC to receive, as an informational item, the presentation
on the FY 2003/04 through FY 2005/0.6 Triennial Performance. Audit for the.
Commission and public transit operators.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION;
In accordance with Public Utilities Code 99246, the Commission is required to
designate an entity other than itself to conduct a performance audit of its activities
and the activities of each transit operator to whom Transportation Development Act
(TDA) funds are allocated. The audits are required to evaluate the efficiency,
effectiveness and :economy of the Commission and the public transit operators. The
audits are required every three years. The Commission retained Pacific Municipal
Consultants to conduct the Triennial Performance Audits covering FY 2003/04
through FY 2005/06 and included the seven public transit operators consisting of the
city of Banning, city of Beaumont, city of Corona, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency,
city of Riverside Special Services, Riverside Transit Agency. and SunLine Transit
Agency.
At the May 2007 CAC/SSTAC meeting, staff was directed to present an overview of
the Commission and public operator Triennial Performance Audits. Highlights of the
staff presentation will include an analysis of ridership and operating costs covering FY
2000/01 through FY 2005/06 as detailed on the following tables:
Ridership: Transit Operators
. J.
City of
Banning .
City of
Beaumont
City of;
Corona
City of
Riverside
PVVTA
RTA
Sunt ine
Total
FY:2001
240,318
83,866
88,146
141,561
21,814
6,827 695
3,872,553
11,275,953
FY 2002 . `
244,974
91,704
109,381
156,306
27,337
7,1021762
3,830,999
- 11,563,463
FY 2003
222,183
97,690
170,236
160,472
30,085
7,146,680
3,552,536
11,379,882
FY2004
222,764
113,682
210,200
157,828
36,046
7,588,864
3,561,765
11,891,149
FY 2005
201,964
118,268
: 228,904
152,752
43,173
7,357,581
3,422`,896
11,525,538
FY 2006
189,421
` 118,618
' 205,875
145,223
51,071
7,381,949
3,552,860
11,645,017
Percent
Change 2003-
2006
-15%
21 %
21 % .
-10%
70%
3%
0%
2%
Percent
Change 2001-
2006
-21 %
41 %
134%
3%
134%
8%
-8%
3%
Audited Operating Costs: Transit Operators
City of
Banning
City of _
Beaumont
City of
Corona
City of
Riverside
PVVTA
RTA
Sunl_ine .
Total
FY 2001
$ : 673,764
$ 537,626
$ 84.8,639
$ 1,428,965
$ 213,798
$ 28,248,626
$; 15,324,576
$. 47,275,994
FY 2002 .
$ 733,21.1-:$
621,787
$ 998,510
$ 1,529,206
$ 316,657.
$ 30,325,078
$ 16,282,299
$ 50,806,748
FY 2003
$ 739,049
$ :745,181
$1,154,925
$ 1,856,404
$ 368,998
$. 32,456,317
$ 17,550,914
$ 54,871,788
FY 2004
$ 833,575
$ 879,642
$1,331,125
$ 1,955,439
$ 844,025
$ 37,073,869
$ 16,653,467
$ 59,571,142
FY 2005
$ 962,843
$1,042,453
` $1,450,636
$ 2,259,550
$ 774,034
$ 38,565,612
$ 17,226,321
$ 62,281,449
FY 2006
$1,044,316
$1,082,568
$1,516,339
$ 2,511,251
$ 775,187
$ 41,489,354
$ 18,487,845
$ 66,906,860
Percent Change
2003-2006
41 %
45%
31 %
35%
110%
28 /0 °
5 ° /0
°
22 /o
Percent Change
2001-2006
55%
101 % .
79%
76%
263%
47%
21 %
42%
The Triennial Performance. Audit. for RCTC's Commuter Rail Program was conducted
by Mayer Hoffman McCann, P.C. as part of the Southern California Regional .Rail.
Authority (SCRRA): Overall, SCRRA received a positive performance review
concluding that the SCRRA is generally operating in an efficient and effective manner;
the audit did identify two areas as "opportunities for improvement":
1) Need for consistency in use of review checklists; and
2) Need to comply with retention policy.
Following are the highlights of the Commission's performance audi
1) The Commission conducts its management of the TDA program in a
competent, professional manner while operating in a complex
intergovernmental environment;
2) The Commission has satisfactorily complied with all state legislative
mandates for regional transportation planning agencies;
3) During the audit period, the Commission formally adopted policies that
clarify the eligibility and use of TDA funds;
4) Commission staff has been responsive in providing technical: assistance
to the operators and in transit planning efforts, including improving upon
the Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) that identifies transit
performance standards to measure transit .operator efficiency. .and
effectiveness;
5) All eight recommendations made in the prior performance audit have
been implemented;
6) The Commission established the TPC to provide policy direction and
guidance for significant activities such as development of a transit vision.
for Riverside County and to provide a forum for addressing a variety of
transit policy issues at the regional level;
7) As a result of the renewal of Measure A, the Commission has been
organizing itself through creation of new positions toward serving more
as an implementation agency;
8) Planned organizational changes and additions of senior level staff in the
last few years have ensured that strong long-term leadership can be
found from within the ranks; and
9) As the Commission continues to grow, the agency has been working to
strengthen internal processes and internal controls to enhance the
management of the complex agency and delivery of projects.
AGENDA ITEM 7
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TIOAI COMMISSION
DATE:
August 21, 2007
TO:
Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation
Advisory Council
FROM:
Tanya Love, Program Manager
THROUGH
Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director
SUBJECT:
Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the CAC/SSTAC to receive, as an informational item, the presentation
on the Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan for Riverside
County.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
With the passage of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), two new funding sources for transit services
are available:
Jobs Access Reverse Commute (Section 5316) provides formula funding for the
development and maintenance of job access projects to transport welfare recipients
and low-income individuals to and from work during non -peak hours as well as supply
reverse commute options for workers in suburban cores; and
New Freedom (Section 5317) provides formula funding for new public transportation
services and alternatives for people with disabilities beyond what is required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
In addition to these new funding sources, the Federal. Transit Administration (FTA)
makes funding available through Caltrans for the Section 5310 program which
provides capital grants for the purpose of assisting private non-profit corporations and
public agencies in providing transportation services to meet the needs of seniors and
persons with disabilities for whom public transportation services are otherwise
unavailable, insufficient, or. inappropriate. In addition to these funding sources, we
anticipate the plan may also .develop recommendations to integrate Western Riverside
County's Measure A Specialized Transit Program.
SAFETEA-LU requires that programs for the Section 5310 program, the Job Access
Reverse Commute and New Freedom programs be derived from a Coordinated Public
Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan). To assist with
developing the Coordinated Plan, the Commission retained the A-M-M-A consulting
firm. A-M=M-A staff will make a presentation at the CAC/SSTAC meeting regarding
the plan elements, target populations, the formation of a TechnicalAdvisory Group,:;
as well as Plan goals..
Attachment:. Coordinated Plan Overview
Riverside County Transportation Commission
2007 PUBLIC -TRANSIT HUMAN
SERVICES TRANSPORTATION
COORDINATION PLAN FOR
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Riverside County's Response to the
Coordinated Transportation Planning
Requirements of SAFETEA-LU
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Act, A Legacy for Users
(SAFETEA-LU) Public Law 109-059
The Riverside County Transportation Commission
(RCTC) has responsibility for preparing the "locally
developed plan" which will prioritize and plan for
use of funds in Riverside County under:
-- New Freedom Program (Section 5317)
-- Job Access & Reverse Commute (Section 5316)
-- Seniors and Persons with Disabilities capital
program (Section 5310)
This plan develops a "unified comprehensive
strategy for public transportation service delivery"
through a coordinated planning process to address
unmet needs of target populations. [SAFETEA-Lu]
TARGET POPULATIONS OF COORDINATION
PLAN:
➢ Persons with disabilities
➢ Elderly individuals
➢ Individuals of low-income
TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP:
Representatives of agencies and organizations in
Riverside County with responsibility for different
members of the target populations will meefat key
points during the project to review its progress and
findings thru fall 2007. Persons interested in
participating may contact Tanya Love at RCTC (951)
787-7141.
COORDINATION PLAN GOALS:
1. To create a locally developed coordination plan that
identifies service gaps and duplication of services.
2. To involve stakeholders in a coordinated planning
process.
3. With input from stakeholders, to develop
competitive project selection from the coordinated
plan
4. To establish criteria for sub -recipient solvency.
5. To ensure that projects comply with regional and
state planning documents (TIP and STIP).
6. To coordinate project evaluation methods and
create a budget for long-term grants management.
COORDINATION PLAN COMPONENTS:
- OUTREACH MEETINGS AND SURVEY
Various local outreach activities will seek to identify
parties in Riverside County who are "interested,
willing and able" to support coordination of
specialized transportation.
- EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT
Identifying demographics and transit resources that
provide a context for coordination opportunities.
- APPLICABLE COORDINATION MODELS
Identifying national models that bring knowledge to
Riverside County about coordination successes.
- FOCUS GROUPS AND PUBLIC WORKSHOPS
Extending outreach efforts to consumers and
agency representatives.
- NEEDS ASSESSMENT Barriers, duplication and
gaps in service for the target populations are
analyzed to suggest coordination responses
- DRAFT AND FINAL PLAN
TIMEFRAMES:
Outreach Efforts — Summer/Fall 2007
Draft and Final Plan -- Fall/Winter 2007
For more information contact Heather Menninger at mennincierRearthlink.net AMMA/JNTC May 2007
AGENDA ITEM 8
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
August 21, 2007
TO:
Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services . Transportation
Advisory Council
FROM:
THROUGH
SUBJECT:
Tanya Love, Program Manager
Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director
Transit Visioning Status Report
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the CACSSTAC to receive and file the staff report on the transit.
visioning process.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
As a result of a Fiscal Year 2003 Triennial Performance Audit recommendation, the
Commission and transit operator staffs have been working closely inan effort to
develop a countywide vision for transit services to improve connectivity, increase
mobility and leverage available funding resources. Based on the policy board
approved vision, the allocation ` of Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds and
Measure A funds for Western Riverside County service providers would subsequently
be determined.
The transit visioning process included a series of topical meetings to review the
following service and programmatic elements:
• Fixed route transit;
• Commuter rail and intercity bus;
• General public dial -a -ride;
• Specialized transit and paratransit;
• Cornmuter assistance; and
• Environment and transit supportive land use.
As a result of various discussions and through the Transit Policy Committee (TPC
direction, transit operators and Commission programmatic staffs developed their
vision of services covering FY 2009/10 through FY 2018/19 consisting of the
following service types:
e
Service Type
Agency
9 y
Service Description
(Examples) .
Approximate Cost
Continuation of
Existing Service
All Transit and Rail
Operators
Fixed Route and
Dian -A -Ride
$1,405,293 570
Enhanced Transit_
and Commuter
Rail Service
-
Banning, Beaumont,
PVVTA, RTA, Rail,
and SunLine
Vehicle Expansion;
Local and
Commuter Express
Bus, Bus Rapid
Transit and
Commuter Rail
Services
$1,213,564,124
New and
Expanded
Facilities
Banning, Beaumont,
Corona, PVVTA,
RTA, the
Commission's
Commuter Rail and
SunLine
Capital Equipment
and Corporate Yard
Improvements,
Transit Centers,
CNG Fueling
Station, Bus Stop
Amenities, ITS,
and Facility
Expansion
$ 159,050,000
Subtotal: Bus and Rail
$ 2,777,907,694
Measure A Set -Aside Programs
Commuter
Assistance
Program
Commission
Existing Services
and New and
Enhanced
Programs
$ . 28,645,661
Specialized
Transit Program
Commission
Seniors and Patriot
Pass Program and
Mobility
Management
Program:
$ 35,000,000
Subtotal: Commuter Assistance and Specialized Transit
$ 63,645,661
TOTAL FUNDING REQUIRED
$ 2,841,553,355 .
Enhanced Transit and Commuter Rail Service
Projects to enhance existing transit and paratransit services are proposed to begin
operation in FY. 2009/10, including a number .of new and/or expanded commuter rail,
commuter express, and subregional bus rapid transit services as follows:
• Commission's Commuter Rail Program:
Perris Valley Line (e.g. South. Perris to Downtown: Riverside to .
relieve congestion in the I-215 corridor)
Perris Valley Line extension to San Jacinto or Temecula
• Riverside Transit Agency:
Commuter Link and Bus Rapid Transit:
East Corridors (e.g. Route 208: 1-215 Corridor between
Temecula and :Riverside);
Service between Hemet and Riverside
Service in the SR-60 corridor between Banning and
Riverside
West Corridors (e.g. Route. 206: 1-15 corridor between
Temecula and Riverside)
- Service between Riverside and the Montclair Transcenter
(e.g. Route 204)
Service between Murrieta and the Oceanside transit Center
(e.g. Route 202)
Bus Rapid Transit (e.g. Riverside to Moreno Valley)
• SunLine Transit Agency:
° Express Bus and Bus Rapid Transit:
Local Express Bus Service (e.g. 1-10 service between Indio
and Palm. Springs)
Commuter. Express Bus Service (e.g. service between.
Coachella Valley and the Pass Area
Bus Rapid Transit (e.g. Highway 1 1 1)
New and Expanded Facilities
Proposed transit center and facility projects > are estimated to . cost $159 million.
Projects in this funding category are not directly linked :to any one operating project'
and consist of the following
City of Banning and City of Beaumont (Pass Area Transit)
°
°
Transit center
Bus stops and shelters
Capital :equipment and corporate yard improvements for Banning
Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency:
° CNG fueling station
o Capital equipment and relocate corporate yard
o Bus stop amenities and shelters
• Riverside Transit Agency:
Operations/maintenance facility expansion
o Transit center/bus stop enhancements
o ITS program for contracted services
SunLine Transit Agency:
° Transit Center/Bus Stop Enhancements
..° ITS program
• Commission's Commuter Rail Program:
o Station parking expansion
' Capital projects that are directly linked to operations are excluded from this category. For example,
the Commission's commuter rail station expansion is directly related to the on -going operations of the
existing commuter rail program; however, new station development is included as a separate line item.
Western Riverside Measure A Funding Set -Aside Programs
The 2009 Measure A Ordinance established a Western Riverside funding set-aside2 for
the Commission's Commuter Assistance and Specialized Transit Programs. Through
the visioning process, programmatic staff estimated the need for
$63.6 million: for the following proposed projects:
Commuter Assistance Program
Continuation of Existing Services:
Program administration and management
Commuter mode -shift incentives -
Employer. services
Commuter exchange mobile education vehicle
Leased park and ride lots
Regional rideshare program
Expanded Services:
511 and traveler information
On -Line mode -shift incentive services
Call center operations
Freeway detection and integration
Park and ride security
• Specialized Transit:
Continuation of Existing Services:
Continue biennial call for projects directed to non-profit
operators to provide niche market specialized transit
services
Expanded Services:
Mobility management program
Develop program utilizing public transit operators, non-profit
and for -profit operators to improve the mobility of senior,
disabled and truly needy population.
Attached are various spreadsheets identifying projects by agency and service element.
2 $390 million was identified in the 2009 Ordinance for Western Riverside. Of that amount, $50
million was identified for Commuter Assistance and $85 million for the Commission's Specialized
Transit Program, thereby leaving a balance of $255 million for commuter rail and intercity bus.
Funding Levels for Proposed Services
As identified earlier in this staff report, the total estimated cost for providing the
proposed services identified through the transit visioning process is estimated to be
$ 2, 841, 553, 355; of that amount $ 63, 64.5, 661 has been identified for the
Commission's Commuter Assistance and Specialized Transit Programs thereby leaving
a funding requirement, of $2,777,907,694 for the bus and commuter rail program.
Of that amount, it is estimated that $495,966,79.6 will be funded through passenger
fares and other operating revenues leaving a funding requirement of $2,281,940898
for bus and rail programs as identified on the following- chart:
Major Projects and Initiatives:
Total Funds
Required
Farebox and
Other
Operating
Revenues
Net Subsidy
Required
Riverside County Total Transit
$2,777,907,694
$495,966,79.6
$2,281,940,898
Coachella Valley Transit
$526,253,237
$78,045,.537
$448,207,700
Palo Verde Valley Transit
$21,542,495
$1,756,935
$19,785,561
Western Riverside County Transit
$2,230,1 1 1,962
$416,164,325
$1,813,947,637
Bus and Paratransit
$1,086,651,980
$204,474,`325
$882,177,655
Commuter Rail
$1,143,459,982
$21 1,690,000
$931,769,982
Estimated Revenue for Proposed Bus and Rail Services
In addition to passenger fares and other miscellaneous operating revenues, the
primary source of funds for Riverside County transit services consist of local, state
and federal dollars. Historically, the majority of transit services are funded by the
TDA, followed by federal and local revenues.
The following chart provides a summary of estimated revenues covering
FY 2009/10 through FY 2018/19:
Transportation Development Act
LTF
STA
Measure A
Federal
TUMF
TOTAL
$1,082,.330,981
$85,597,444
$147,666,667
$296,465,300
$15,184,669
$1,627,245,061
Less Revenue Requested:
$2,281,940,898
Projected Revenue Shortfall:
$(654,695,837)
Estimated revenue required to cover the proposed projects in the transit visioning
process (for rail and public bus) is not sufficient to cover estimated expenditures.
The Next Steps In the Transit Visioning Process
The next steps in the transit visioning process are as follows:
1) Provide opportunity for transit operators and programmatic staff to
re-examine their proposed service levels and estimated costs to ensure
accuracy;
2) Determine revenue allocation and related short fall by apportionment
area;
3) Calculate the greenhouse gas emission benefit for the proposed service
elements; and
4) Provide a preliminary report to the TPC in September; final
recommendation will be presented in October 2007.
Attachments:
1) Total Funding Requested by Area and Program
2) Continuation of Existing Services Summary
3) Enhanced Transit and Rail Service
4) New and Expanded Facilities
5) Measure A Set -Aside Programs: Commuter Assistance and Specialized Transit
ATTACHMENT I.
RCTC Transit Visioning Plan
Total Funding Requested by Area and Program
Major Projects and Initiatives
Total Funds
Required
q
Fareboz and Other
Operating
Revenues
Net Subsidy
R
Required
Federal Funds
Local Funds
Sum of Annualized'
Subsidies
Projected Riders
Projected
Passenger Miles
Subsidy Per
Passenger
Subsidy Per
Passenger Mile
Riverside County Total Transit
$ 2,777,907,694
$ 495,966,796
$ 2,281,940,898
$ 573,687,471
$ 1,708,253,427
$ 1,766,760,097
324,765,985
4,939,740,409
$ 5.44
$ 0.36
Coachella Valley Transit
$ 526,253,237
$ 78,045,537
$ 448,207,700
$ 50,248,271
$ 397,959,429
$ 445,894,649
83,826,595
1,324,348,433
$ 5.32
$ 0.34
Palo Verde Valley Transit
$ 21,542,495
$ 1,756,935
$ 19,785,561
$ 203,280
$ 19,582,281
$ 18,564,386
1,126,240
4,955,456
$ 16.48
$ • 3.75
Western Riverside County Transit
$ 2,230,111,962
$ 416,164,325
$ 1,813,947,637
$ 523,235,920
$ 1,290,711,717
$ 1,302,301,062
239,813,150
3,610,436,519
$ 5.43
$ 0.36
Bus and Paratransit
$ 1,086,651,980
$ 204,474,325
$ 882,177,655
$ 134,080,135
$ 748,097,520
$ 860,531,080
167,024,463
1,157,962,309
$ 5.15
$ 0.74
Commuter Rail
$ 1,143,459,982
$ 211,690,000
$ 931,769,982
$ 389,155,785
$ 542,614,197
$ 441,769,982
72,788,687
2,452,474,210
$ 6.07
$ 0.18
Commuter Assistance Program
$ 28,645,661
$ -
$ 28,645,661
$ -
$ 28,645,66i
$ 28,645,661
17,607,550
468,270,277
$ 1.63
$ 0.06
Specialized Transit Program
$ - 35,000,000
$ -
$ 35,000,000
$ -
$ 35,000,000
$ 35,000,000
58,333,333
233,333,333
$ - 0.60
$ 0.15
30
ATTACHMENT 2
ROTC Transit Visioning Plan
Continuation of Existing Services
Major Projects and initiatives
1 i
Total Funds
Required
Farebox and Other
Operating
Revenues
Net Subsidy
Required
Federal Funds
Local Funds
Useful
Life
Plan Years
of
operation
Sum of
Annualized
Subsidies
Projected
Riders
„
Average
g
TripPassenger*
Length
Projected
of'
gel
Miles
SubsidySubsidy
Per
Passenger
Per .
Passenger
Banning
$ 16,847,006
$ 2,355,000
$ 1,853,171
$
$ 14,993,835
$ 2,355,000
$ -
$ -
$ 14,993,835
$ 2,355,000
11
12
11
11
$ 14,993,835
$ 2,158,750
2,573,848
2.1
5,405,081
.Mile
Operations
Vehicle Maintenance and Replacement
Subtotal
$ , , 19202006
$ 1853171.
, ,
$ 17,348,835
$ -
$ 17;348,835 :
=
$ 17,152,585
2,573,848
2.1
5,405,081
$ ' 6.66
$ 3.17
Beaumont
$ 19,000,000
$ 2.,400,000
$ 1,900,000
$ - :
$ 17,100,000
$ 2,400,000
$- -
$ -
$ 17,100,000
$ 2,400,000
11
12
11
11
_$. 17,100,000
$ 2,200,000
,2,405,063
2.1
5,050,633
-
Operations
Maintenance and Replacement
Subtotal
$ 21,400,000
$ 1,900,000
$ - 19,500,000`
$ -
$ 19,500,000
$ 19,300,000
2,405063
2.1
5,050,633
$ 8.02
$ 3.82
Corona
$ 26,113,409
$ 5,687,139
$ 2,911,816
$ -
. $ 23,201,593
$ 5,687,139
$ -
$ 4,549,711
$ 23,201,593
$ 1,137,428
11
12
11
11
$ 23,201,593
$ 5,213,211
2,721,323
4.0
10,885,292
.
Operations
Maintenance and Replacement,
Subtotal
$ 31,800,548
$ 2,911,816
$ 28,888,732.
$ 4,549,711
$ 24,339,021
$ 28,414,804
2,721,323
4.0
10,885,292
$ 10.44
$ 2.61
PVVTA
$ 14,222,925
$ _ 1,169,050 .
$ 1,422,293
$ -
$ 12.800,633
$ 1,169,050
$ -
$ -
$ 12,800,633
$ 1,169,050
11
11.
11
11
$ 12,800,633
$ 1,169,050
911,726
4.4
4,011,594
Operations
Maintenance and Replacement
Subtotal
$ 15,391,975
$ 1,422,293
$ 13,969,683
$ -
$ 13,969,683
$ 13,969,683
9.11,726
4,4
4,011,594
$ 15.32
3.48
Riverside Special Services
$ 35,476,098.
$ 8,700,000
$ 3,547,610
$ -
$ 31,928,488
$ 8,700,000
$ -
$ 6,960,000
-
$ 31,928,488
$ 1,740,000
11
11
11
11
$ 31,928,488
$ 8,700,000
1,867,163
.
4.0
7,468,652
.$
Operations
Maintenance and Replacement
Subtotal
_$ 44,176,098
$ 3.547,610
$ 40,628,488
$ 6,960,000
$ 33,668,488
$ 40,628,488
1,867,163
4.0
7,468,652
$ 21.76
$ 5.44
Riverside Transit Agency
$ 707,756,7.79
$ 94,516,764
-
$ 163,515,842
$ -
$ 544,240,937
$ 94,5.16,764
$ -
$ 75.613,411
-
$ 544,240,937
$ 18,903,353
11
12
11
11
$ 544,240,937
$ 86,640,367
129,911,817
.6.8
883,400,356
Operations
Maintenance and Replacement -
Subtotal
$ 802,273,543 _-$
163,51.5,842
$ 638,757,701
$ 75,613,411
$ 563,144,290
$. 630,881,304
129,911,817
6.8
883,400,356
$ 4_86.
.$ 0.71
RCTC Commuter Rail
$ 140,431,508
$ 53,701,000
$ -
$ -
$ 140,431,508
$ 53,701.,000
$ 27,155,785
$ -
$ 113,275,723
$. 53,701,000.
11
11
11
11
$ 140.,431,508
$ 53,701,000
37,191,452
32.8
1,219,879,626
Operations
Station Maintenance
Subtotal
$ 194,132,508,
$ -
$ 194,132,508
$ 27,155,785
$ 166,976,723
$ 194,132,508
37,191,452
32.8
_
1,219,879 626
$ 5.22
-$ 0_16
SunLine
$ 271,911,892
$ 5,005,000
$ 43,711,979
$ -
$ 228,199,913
$ 5,005,000
$ 10,328,074
$ 4,004,000
$ 217,871,839
$ 1,001,000
_
11
12
11
11
$ 228,199,913
°$ 4,587,917
46,908,791
6:2
290,834,504
Operations
Maintenance and Replacement
Subtotal
$ 276,916,892
$ 43,711,979
$ 233,204,913
$ 14,332,074
$ 218,872,839
$ 232,787,830
46,908,791
6.2,:
290,834,504
$ 4.96
$ 0.80
31
ATTACHMENT 2
RCTC Transit Visioning Plan
Continuation of Existing Services Summary
Major Projects and Initiatives
Total Funds
Required
Farebox and Other
Operating
Revenues
Net Subsidy
Required
Federal Funds
Local Funds
Sum. of
Annualized
Subsidies
Projected
Riders
Average Trip
Length
Projected
Passenger Miles
Subsidy Per
Passenger
Subsidy Per
Passenger
Mile
Riverside County Total
$ 1,405,29.3,570
_:$ ' 218,862,710
$ 1,186,430,860
$ 128,610,981. _
$ 1,057,819,879
$ 1,177,267,201
_. 224,491,183
2,426,935,738
$ 5.24
$ 0.49.
Coachella Valley
$ 276,916,892
$ 43,711,979
$ 233,204,913
$ 14,332,074
$ . 218,872,839
$ 232,787,830
46,908,791
290,834,504
$ 4.96
$ 0.80
Palo Verde Valley
$ 15,391.975
$ 1,422,293
$ 13,969,683
$ -
$ 13,969,683
$ 13,969,683
911,726
4,011,594-
$ 15.32
$ 3A8
Westem Riverside County
$ 1,112,984,703
$_ 173,728,438
$ 939,256,265
$ 114,278,907
$ _ 1324,977,358
$ 930,509,689
176,670 666
2,132,089,639
$ 5.27
$ -_ 0.44
Bus and Paratransit
$ 918,852,195
$ 173,728,438
$ 745,123,757
$ 87,123,122
$ ' 658,000,635
$ 736,377,181 .
139,479,214
912,210,014' $ 5.28;
$- 0131
Commuter Rail
$ 194,132,508
NA
$ 194,132,508
$ 27,155,785
$ 166,976,723
$ 194,132,508 .
37,191,452.
1,219,879,626 $ 5.22
$ 0.16;
ATTACHMENT 3
RCTC Transit Visioning Plan
Enhanced Transit and Rail Service
Major. Projects and Initiatives
Total Funds
Required
Farebox and
Other
Operating .
Revenues
Net
Required
Federal Funds
Loco! Funds
Useful
Life.
_
Ptah Years
of
Operation
p
Sum of
Annualized
Subsidies
Projected
Riders.
Average
Trip length
projected
Passenger Miles..
Subsidy
Per
Passenger.
Subsidy
y
Per
Passenger
Banning
Operations
Vehicle Expansion
$ 2,432,759
$ 70,000
$ 267,603
$ =
$ 2,165,156
$ 70,000
$ -
$ -.
$ 2,165,156
$ , 70,000 .
11
11
11
11
$ 2,165,156
$ 70,000
371,672
21
780,510
Mile'
Subtotal
$ 2,502,759
$ 267,603
$ 2,235,156 .
$ -
$ 2,235,156
$ 2,235,156
371,672
2.1
780,510
$ 6.01
$ 2.86
Beaumont
$ 2,432,759
$ 3,346.420
$ 254,100 ..
$ 243,276
$ 334,642
$ -
-
$ 2,189,483
$ 3,011,778
$ 254,100
$ -
$ -
$ 203,280
$ 2,189,483
$ 3,011,778
$ 50,820
11
11
12
11
11
11
$ 2,189,483
$ 3,011,778
. $ 232,925
307.944
214,514
2.1
4.4
646,683
943,862
.
Operations
Operations
Vehicle Expansion
Subtotal
$ 3,600,520
$ 334,642
$ 3,265,878
$ 203,280
$ 3,062,598
$ 3,244,703
214,514
4.4
943,862
$ 15.13
$ 3.44
Riverside Transit Agency
$ 84,246,267
$ 16,901,000
$ 7,717,000
$ 15,000,000
$ 25,311,407
$ 3,380,200
$ 1,543,400.
$ -
$ 58.934,860
$ 13,520,800
$ 6,173,6W
$ 15,000,000
$ 4,557,013
$ -
$ -
$ 12,000,000
$ 54,377,847
$ 13,520,800
$ 6,173,600
$ 3,000,000
11
11
11
12
11
11
11
11
$ 58,934.860 .
$ 13,520,800
. $ 6.173,600
$ 13,750,000
24,494,910
1,506,197
864,526
_
6.8
32.8
32.8
166,565,388
49,403,262
28,356,453
-
$ 2.41
$ 8.98
$ 7.14
$ 0.35
$ 0_27
$ 0.22
Magnolia Ave./6th St. BRT
Conunuter Link East
Commuter Link West
Vehicle Expansion_
Subtotal
$ 123,864,267
$ 30,235,007
$ 93,629,260
$ 16,557,013
$ 77,072,247
$ 92,379,260
26,865,633
9.1
244,325,102
$ 3.44
$ 0.38
RCTC.Commuter Rail
$ 50,716,056
$ 453,690,000
$ 26,921,418
$ 60,000,000
$ 8,000,000
$ 250,000,000
NA
$ 191,690,000
NA
$ -
NA
$ -
$ 50,716,056
$ 262,000.000
$ 26,921,418
$ 60,000,000
$ 8,000,000
$ 250,000,000
$ -
$162,000,000
$ -.
$ .
$ -
$120,000,000
$ 50,716,056
$ 100,000,000
$ 26,921,418
$ 60,000,000
$ 8,000,000
$ 130,000,000
10
30
9
30
2
30
10
10
9
9
2
2
$ 50,716,056
-$ 87,333,333
$ 26,921,418
$ 18,000,000
$ 8,000,000
$ 16,666,667.
25,112,513
9,143,535
1,341,187
-
32.8
39.0
39.0
823,690,426
356,597,865
52,306,293
$ 2.02
$ 2,94
$ 5.96
$ 0.06
$ 0.08
$ 0.15
Expansion of Existing Lines Operations
Expansion of Existing Lines Capital
Perris Valle Line Operations y P
Perris Valley Line Capital
Extension to San Jacintorremecula Operations
Extension to San JacintofTemecula Capital
Subtotal
$ . 849,327,474
$ 191,690,000
. $. 657,637,474
$282,000,000
$ 375,637,474 .
$ 207,637,474
35,597,235
34.6
1,232,594,584
$ 5.83
$ 0.17
SunLine
$ 75,104,658
$ 64,375,421
$ 42,916,947 .
$ 32,187,711
$ 17,251608
$ 12,016,745
$. 10,300;067
$ 6,866,712
$ 5,150,034
$ = -
$ 63,087,913
$ 54,075,354
$ 36,050,236
'$ 27,037,677
$. 17,251,608
$ 2,840,220
$ 2,434,475
$ 1,622,983
$.. 1,217,237
$ 13,801,282
$ 60,247,692
$ _ 51,640,879
..$ 34,427.253
$ 25,820,440
$ 3,450,326
11
11
11
11
12
11
11
11
11
11
$. 63,087,913
$ 54,075,354
$ 36,050,236
'$ 27,037,677
$ 15,813,974'
,
Highway 111 BRT
Commuter Bus Service ,.
1-10 Express Service
Regional Service improvements
Vehicle Expansion
12,921,231
11;075,341
7,383,561.
5,537,671
26.9
48.3
15.8
6.2
347,581,127
534;938;983
116,660,261
34,333,558
$ 4.88
$ 4.88
-$ 4.88
$ 4.88
$ 0.18
$ 0_10
$ 0.31
$ 0.79
Subtotal
$. 231,836,345 ;
$ 34,333,558
$ 197,502,787
$ 21,916,197
$ 175,586,590
$ 196,065,153
36,917,804
28.0
1,033,513,929
$ 5.31
$ 0.19
33
ATTACHMENT 3
RCTC Transit Visioning Plan
Enhanced Transit and Rail Service
Major Projects and Initiatives
Total Funds
Required
Farebox and
Other
Operating
Revenues
Net Subsidy
Required .
Federal Funds
Local Funds
Sum of
Annualized
Subsidies
Projected
Riders
Average
Trip
Length
Projected
Passenger
Miles
Subsidy
Per
Passenger
Subsidy Per
Passenger
Mile \`
Riverside County Total
$ 1,213,564,124
$ 257,104,086
$ 956,460,038
_ $ 320,676,490
$ 635,783,548
$ 503,751,229
100,274,802
2,512,804,671
$ 5.02
$ 0.20 .
Coachella Valley
$. 231,836,345
$ 34,333,558
$ 197,502,787
$ 21,916,197
$ 175,586,590
$ 196,065,153
" . `36,917,804
1,033,513,929
$ 5.31
$_ 0.19
Palo Verde. Valley
$ 3,600,520
$ 334,642
$ 3,265,878
$ 203,280
$ 3,062,598
$ 3,244,703
- 214,514
943,862
'$ 15.13
$ 3.44
Western Riverside County
$ 978,127,259.
$ 222,4.35,886
$ 755,691,373
$ 298,557,013
$ '457,134.,360
_$_ _ 304,441,373
63,142,484
1,478,346,880 :
, $ 4.82
$0.21
Bus and Paratransit
$ 128,799,785
$ 30,745,8.86
$ 98,053,899
$ 16,557,013
$ 81,496,886
$ 96,803,899
27,545,249
245,752,295
$ 3.51
$ 0.39
Commuter Rail
$ 849,327,474
$ 191,690,000
$ 657,637,474
$ 282,000,00.0
_ $ 375,637,474
$_ 207,637,474
35,597,235
1,232,594,584
$ 5.83.
$ 0.17
ATTACHMENT
RCTC Transit Visioning Plan
New and Expand Facilities
Major Projects and Initiatives
Total Funds
Required
eq .
Farebox and
Other
Operating
O
Revenues
Net Subsidy
Required
Federal Funds
Local Funds
Useful
Life
Plan Years
of
Operation
-
Sum of
Annualized
Subsidies
Projected
Riders
Average
Trip
Length
Projected
Passenger
Miles
Subsidy
Per
Passenger
Subsidy
Per
Passenger
Mile
Banning
Capital Equipment and Corporate Yard. Improvements
$ 800,000
$ -
$ 800,000
$ -
$ - 800,000
20
10
$ 400,000
Pass Transit System Transit Center
$ 2,500,000
. $ -
$ 2,500,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 500,000
20
10
$ 1,250,000
Subtotal
$ 3,300,000
$ -
$ 3,300,000
.$ 2,000,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 1,650,000
2.945.520
-.
6,185,591
$ 0.56
$, 0.27
Beaumont
-
Bus Stops and Shelters
$ 200,000
$ -
$ 200,000
$ -
$ 200,000
11
11
.$ 200,000
.
Pass Transit System Transit Center
$ 1,000,000
$ -
$ 1,000,000
$ 800,000
. $ 200,000
20
10
$ 500,000
Subtotal
$ 1,200,000
$ _
$ 1,200,000
$ 800,000
$ 400,000
$ 700,000
2,713,007
-
5,697,316
$ 0.26
$ 0.12
Corona
Operations
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
-
-
$ -
-
-
Maintenance and Replacement - -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
_
-
$ -
Subtotal
$ -
$ -
$ - -
$ -
$ -
$ - .
-
_
-
$ -
$ -
PWTA
-
- -
Capital Equipment and Relocate Corporate Yard
$ 2,000,000
$ -
$ 2,000,000
$ -
$ 2,000,000
20
10
$ 1,000,000
CNG Fueling Station
$ 400,000
$ -
$ 400.000
$ -
$ 400,000
20
10
$ 200,000
Bus Stop Amenities
$ 150,000
$ -
$ 150,000
$ -
$ 150,000
11
11
$ 150,000
Subtotal
$ 2,550,000
$ -
$ 2,550,000
$ -
$ 2,550,000
$ 1,350,000
2,713,007
-
5,697,316
. $ 0.50
$ 0.24
Riverside Special Services
-
-
-
Operations
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
-
-
$ -
-
-
Maintenance and Replacement
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
_
$ _
Subtotal
$ -
$ _
$
$ -
$ -
$ -
-
-
-
$ -
$ _
Riverside Transit Agency
$ 6,000,000
$ -
$ 6,000,000
$ 4.800.000
$ 1,200,000
12
8
$ 4,000,000
ITS for Contract Routes
Facility Expansion '
$ 15,000,000
$ -
$ 15,000,000
$ 12,000,000:
$ 3,000,000
20
10
$ 7,500,000
Transit Center/Bus Stop Enhancements
$ 13,500,000
$ -
$ 13,500,000
$ 10,800,000
$ 2,700,000
11
11
$ 13,500,000
Subtotal
$ 34,500,000
$ -
$ 34,500,000
; $ 27,600,000 .
$ 6,900,000
$ 25,000,000
156,777,450
-
1,127,725,458
$. 0.16
$ 0.02
RCTC `Commuter Rai!
-
Station Parking Expansion
$ 100,000,000
$ 20,000,000
1
$ 80,000,000
$ 8-0,000,000
$ -
20
10
$ 40,000,000
72,788,687
2,452,474,210
Subtotal
$ 100,000,000
$ 20,000,000
$ 80,000,000
$ 80,000,000
$ -
$ 40,000,000
72,788,687
-
2,452,474,210
$. 0.55
$ 0.02
SunLine
-
ITS Program.
$ 5,500,000
$ -
$ 5,500.000
$ 4,400,000
$ 1,100,000.
12
11
$ 5,041-,667
Transit Center/taus Stop Enhancements
$ 12,000,000
$ -
$ 12,000,000
$ 9,600,000
$ 2,400,000
11
11
$ 12,000,000
Subtotal
$ 17,500,000
$ -
$ 17,500,000
$ 14,000,000
$ 3,500,000
$ 17,041.667
83,826,595
-
1,324,348,433
$ 0.20
$ 0.01
35
RCTC Transit Visioning Plan
New and Expaned Facilities
Farebox and
Major Projects and Initiatives
1 1
Total Funds
Required
Other
Operating
Revenues
Net SubsidySum
Required
Federal Funds
Local Funds
of
Annualized
Subsidies
Projected..
Riders
Average
Trip Length
Projected
Passenger
Miles
Subsidy Per
y
Passenger
Riverside County Total
$ 159,050,000 _
$ 20,000,000
$ 139,050,000 _
$124,400,000
_ $ 14,650,000
$ 85,741,667
321,764,267
4,922,128,324
$ 0.27
Coachella Valley
$ 17,500,000
$ -
$ 17,500,000
$ 14,000,000-'
$ 3,500,000
$ 17,041,667
83,826,595
1,324,348,433
$° . 0.20
Palo Verde Valley
$ 2,550,000
$ -
$ 2,550,000
$ -
_$ 2,550,000
$ 1,350,000
2,713,007-
5,697,316:•
$" 0.50
Western Riverside County
$ 139,000,000
$ 20,000,000
$ 119,000,000
$110,400,000'-
$ 8,600,000
$ 67,350,000
235,224,664 .
3,592 082575
,
$ 0.29
Bus and Paratransit
$ 39,000,000
$ -
$ 39,000,000
$ 30,400,000
$ 8,600,000
$ 27,350,000
162,435,977
1,139,608,365
.
$ 0.17
Commuter Rail
$ 100,000,000
$ 20,000,000
$ 80,000,000
$ 80,000,000
$ -
$ .40,000,000
72,788,687
2,452,474,210
$ 0.55
Subsidy Per
Passenger
Mile
$ 0.02
$ . 0.01
$ 0.24
$ 0.02
$ . 0.02
$ 0,02
ATTACHMENT 4
ATTACHMENT
RCTC Transit Visioning Plan
Measure A Set -Aside Programs
Major Projects and Initiatives
Total Funds
Required
Farebox and
Other
Operating
Revenues
Net Subsidy
Required
Federal Funds
Local Funds
Use..
Life
Plan Years
of
Operation
Sum of
Annualized
Subsidies
Projected
Riders
Average
Trip
Length
Projected
Passenger
Miles
Subsidy
Per
Passenger
Subsidy
Per
-Passenger
Mile
Total Measure A Set -Aside Programs
$ 63,645,661
$ 63,645,661
$ 63,645,661
$ 63,645,661
75,940,883
701,603,610
$ 0.84
$ 0.09
Commuter Assistance Program
Existing Services
$ 15,940,565
$
$ 15,940,565
$ -
$ 15,940,565
10
10
$ 15,940,565
New and Enhanced Programs
$ 12,705,096
$ -
$ 12,705,096
$
$ 12,705,096
10
10
$ 12,705,096
Subtotal
$ 28,645,661
$ -
$ 28,645,661
$ -
$ 28,645,661
$ 28,645,661
17,607,550
-
468,270,277
$ 1.63
$ 0.06
Specialized Transportation Program
$ 35,000,000
Seniors and Patriot Passport Program
$ 15,000,000
$
$ 15,000,000
$
$ 15,000,000
10
10
$ 15,000,000
25,000,000
4.0
100,000,000
$ 0.60
$ 0.15
Senior Mobility Management Program
$ 20,000,000
$ -
$ 20,000,000
$ -
$ 20,000.000
10
10
$ 20 000,000
33,333,333
4.0
133,333,333
$ 0.60
$ 0.15
Subtotal
$ 35,000,000
$ -
$ 35,000,000
$ -
$ 35,000,000
$ 35,000,000
58,333,333
4.0
233,333,333
$ 0.60
$ 0.15
RCTC Transit Visioning Plan
Measure A Set -Aside Programs
Major Projects and Initiatives
1 1
Total Funds
Required
Farebox and
Other
Operating
Revenues
Net Subsidy
Required
- -
Federal Funds
Local Funds
Sum of
Annualized
Subsidies
Projected
Riders
Average
Trip
Length
Projected
Passenger
Miles
Subsidy
Per
Passenger
Subsidy
Per
Passenger
Mile
Western Riverside County
$ 63,645,661
$ -
$ 63,645,661
$ -
$ 63,645,661
$ 63,645,661
75,940,883
701,603,610
$ 0.84
$ 0.09
Commuter Assistance Program
$ 28,645,661
$
$ 28,645,661
$ -
$ 28,645,661
$ 28,645,661
17,607,550
468,270,277
$ 1.63
$ 0.06
Senior Mobility Management Program
$ 35,000,000
$
$ 35,000,000
$
$ 35,000 000
$ 35,000,000
58,333,333
233,333,333
$ 0.60
$ 0.15
37