Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout08 August 27, 2007 Budget & ImplementationRECORDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA TIME: 9:30 a.m. DATE: Monday, August 27, 2007 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 1" Floor, Riverside ***COMMITTEE MEMBERS*** Rick Gibbs, Chair / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta Steve Adams, Vice Chair / Dom Betro, City of Riverside Barbara Hanna / Brenda Sales, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / Charles Grotke, City of Blythe Mary Craton / John Zaitz, City of Canyon Lake Gregory S. Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City Eduardo Garcia / Steven Hernandez, City of Coachella Alex Bias / Yvonne Parks, City of Desert Hot Springs Bob Magee / Robert L. Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore Gordon Moller / Alan Seman, City of Rancho Mirage Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside, District II Jeff Stone, County of Riverside, District III *STAFF*** Eric Haley, Executive Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer ***AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY*** Annual Budget Development and Oversight Countywide Strategic Plan Legislation Measure A Implementation and Capital Programs Public Communications and Outreach Programs Competitive Grant Programs: TEA 21-CMAQ & STP, Transportation Enhancement and SB 821-Bicycle & Pedestrian SAFE/Freeway Service Patrol TUMF Program and other areas as may be prescribed by the Commission Comments are welcomed by the Committee: if you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. 11.36.06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE www.rctc.org A GE NDA * *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Monday, August 27, 2007 BOARDROOM County Administrative Center 4080.Lemon Street, lst Floor Riverside, California In compliance with .the Americans with Disabilities A•ct and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at .least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Committee ,may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Committee, waive this three minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion,, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. Also, the Committee may terminate public commentsif such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield theirtime to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Committee shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Board should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda which are not listed on the agenda. Board members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. Budget and implementation Committee August 27, 2007 Page 2 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 23, 2007 AND JUNE 25, 2007 6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Committee. If there are less than 2/3 of the Committee members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of .the agenda.) • CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 7A. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: Page 1. 1) Receive and file the lnterfund Loan Activity Report for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2007; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 7B. • QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Page Overview This item is for the Committee to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. 7C. .QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Overview This item is for the Committee to: Page 16 1) Receive an file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2007; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. " Budget and implementation Committee. August 27, 2007 Page 3 8. 7D. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: Page 22 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2007; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 2009 MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES Overview This item is for the Committee to: Page 24 1) Approve the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Guidelines; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 07-01 1, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Maintenance of Effort Guidelines; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 9. STATE ROUTE. 60/INTERSTATE 215 EAST JUNCTION CONNECTORS ADDITIONAL FUNDS REQUEST Page 37 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve $4 million of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program funds for the 60/215 East. Junction connectors project for the right-of-way phase; 2) Approve $459,000 of Measure A; funds as match to the $4 million CMAQ funds in the event it is needed; 3) Approve a budget amendment for a $4 million increase to federal revenues in FY 2007/08; 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to . legal counsel review, to sign associated amendment agreements to reflect additional funding; and 5) " Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee August 27, 2007 Page 4 10. ADDITIONAL FUNDS REQUEST FOR STATE ROUTE 60/VALLEY WAY TO INTERSTATE 15 PROJECT Overview This • item is for the Committee to: Page 39 1) Approve an additional $1.5 million of Congestion Mitigation and .Air Quality (CMAQ) program funds for the SR-60/Valley Way to 1-15 high occupancy vehicle (HOV) and mixed flow (MF) gap closure project; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review; to sign associated amendment agreements to reflect additional funding; and 3) Forward to the •Commission for final action. 11. FISCAL YEAR 2008-12 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR .CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITIES OF CALIMESA, MURRIETA, AND NORCO . Page 41 Overview This item is for the .Committee to: 1) Approve the FY 2008-12 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) for local streets and roads for the cities of Calimesa, Murrieta, and Norco as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 12. FISCAL ; YEAR 2007-11 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITY OF CALIMESA Page 59 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the FY 2007-11 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for local streets and roads for the city of Calimesa as submitted, and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action Budget and Implementation Committee August 27, 2007 Page 5 13. AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR 2007-1' 1MEASURE • A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITY OF CORONA Page 65 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the amendment to the FY 2007-1 1 Measure A . Capital Improvement Plan for local streets and roads for the city of Corona as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 14. AGREEMENT •NO. 08-33-011-00 FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE NORTH MAIN CORONA PARKING STRUCTURE AND THE PERRIS MULTIMODAL FACILITY AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE NORTH MAIN CORONA PARKING STRUCTURE AND THE PERRIS MULTIMODAL FACILITY Page 69 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Direct staff to present its award recommendation and notice to proceed to the •Commission for Agreement . No. 08-33-01 1-00 for construction management services to support the construction of the North Main. Corona parking structure in the city of Corona and the Perris Multimodal Facility in the city of Perris; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review., to execute Agreement No. 08-33-011-00 on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize staff to advertise to receive .bids for the construction of the North Main Corona parking structure in the city of Corona and the Perris Multimodal Facility in the city of Perris, contingent on federal funding authorization; and 4) Forward to the. Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee August 27, 2007 Page 6 15. AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON -CALL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR FOR THE METROLINK STATIONS Page 72 Overview This item is for the. Committee to: 1) Direct staff to develop and advertise a request for statement . of qualifications (SOQ) for on -call maintenance contractor services for the five Metrolink commuter rail stations; 2) Form a selection committee comprised of Commission and Metrolink staff to review, evaluate, and rank all SOQs received; 3) Authorize staff to negotiate a contract with the top -ranked contractor and - bring back a recommendation to the Commission for contract award; and 4) Forward• to the Commission for final action: 16. INTERSTATE 215 BI-COUNTY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — INCREASE IN FUNDING FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT WORK Overview This item is for the Committee to: 17. Page 74 1) Authorize an increase in funding. from $2 million to $4 million for the development of a project report and environmental document (PR/ED) for the 1-215 Bi-County improvement project; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. STATE AND. FEDERAL STATUS REPORT Page .76 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt a SUPPORT position for the development of the Foothill -South Transportation Corridor (State Route 241) in Orange County 2) Receive and file as an information item; and 3) . Forward to the Commission for final action. 18 ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA • Budget and Implementation Committee August 27, 2007 Page 7 19. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT O vervie w This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report on attended and upcoming meeting/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. 20. ADJOURNMENT AND NEXT MEETING The. next Budget and Implementation Committee meeting is scheduled to be. held at 9:30 a.m., Monday, September 24, 2007 Board Chambers, .St Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. Riverside County Tra °dation CO ill sioi TO: FROM: DATE: Riverside County Transportation Commission Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board August 27, 2007 SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts of Interest Issues - Budget and Implementation Committee Agenda of August 27, 2007 The August 27, 2007 agenda of the Budget and Implementation Committee includes items which may raise possible conflicts of interest. An RCTC member may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $ 250 is received in the past 12 months from any entity or individual listed. Agenda Item No. 14 - Agreement No. 08-33-011-00 for Construction Management Services to Support the North Main Corona Parking Structure and the Perris Multimodal Facility and Authorization to Advertise for Construction Bids for the North Main Corona Parking Structure and the Perris Multimodal Facility Consultant(s): Gordon H. Chong & Partners 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE SIGN -IN SHEET AUGUST 27, 2007 NAME AGENCY E MAIL ADDRESS 61e, e-A,r-n1 M O LL—Ez\ XX a;z-y o F' K,Lf cf-101V1(KA6€_. &Atkoz.Le(Z l@o (aOL d 0,1 ereny a n/ L__Agz� R.i c,on g 61046-) MvAA/ `7-0e5ill� ¢e (4/le.<;l10y� ✓� 6 �2. . zr7. b /5 6..P / /'IJ v1- I. �_ aki 4 jily r `-- caQS$ cd ,C,' two ij' LA- `oil E �:Q � lst,c_GUO G-- ��8-C✓ '& C Q RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE ROLL CALL AUGUST 27, 2007 Present County of Riverside, District II -iRers�de, ®y�sicit 11 �. City of Banning un City of Cathedral City e�iia City of Desert Hot Springs Lake„Elsmgrg-,„ " Murrieta 9 ' ffix@�� Anc lg City of Riverside »� �? CatvofTemecul Absent O J AGEN A ITEM 5 MINUTES i� " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE Monday, April 23, 2007 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee was called to order by Chair Rick Gibbs at 9:34 a.m., in the Board Room at the Riverside County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Members/Alternates Present Steve Adams Roger Berg. Mary Craton Rick Gibbs Bob Magee Ron Roberts Jeff Stone Members Absent Joseph DeConinck Eduardo Garcia Hank Hohenstein Gordon Moller Gregory Pettis Brenda Salas John F. Tavagtione Due to the lack of a quorum, the Commissioners present operated as a "Committee of the Whole". Recommendations from the "Committee of the Whole" were submitted to the Commission. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests to speak from the public. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of February 26, 2007, will be submitted at the next meeting. 5. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There were no additions or revisions to the agenda. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes April 23, 2007 Page 2 6. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. M/S/C (Stone/Berg) to present the following Consent Calendar items to the Commission for approval: 6A. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT 1) Receive: and file the lnterfund Loan Activity report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2007; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 6B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2007; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. AWARD OF AGREEMENTS TO DONNA DESMOND ASSOCIATES AND DESMOND, MARCELL° & AMSTER FOR ON -CALL GOODWILL VALUATION SERVICES Min Saysay, Right -of -Way Manager, presented an overview of: the need and scope of services for on -call goodwill valuation as the Commission acquires right-of-way for various projects. Commissioner Jeff Stone expressed concern regarding the valuations as public documents and recommended that the: results be reviewed by the Commission in closed session to protect the business Min Saysay responded that his request will be included in the policies ; and procedures manual M/SIC' :('Roberts/Stone) to recommend to the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 07-33-124-00 to Donna Desmond Associates and Agreement No. 07-33-125=00 to Desmond, Marcell° & Amster to perform On -Call Goodwill Valuation Services; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, execute the agreements on behalf of :the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. • Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes April 23, 2007 Page 3 8. AWARD OF AGREEMENTS TO LAND AMERICA COMMERCIAL SERVICES, CHICAGO TITLE,, AND FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY FOR ON -CALL TITLE AND ESCROW SERVICES Min Saysay presented an overview of the need and scope of services for on -call title and escrow services as the Commission acquires right-of-way for various _projects. M/S/C (Stone/Craton) to recommend to the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 07-31-128-00 to Land America Commercial Services, Agreement No. 07-31-129-00 to Chicago Title, and Agreement No. 07-31-130-00 to First American .Title Company to perform Title and Escrow Services; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and 3). Forward to. the Commission for final action. AWARD OF AGREEMENTS TO CROCKETT & ASSOCIATES, LTD. AND DESMOND, MARCELLO & AMSTER FOR ON -CALL FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT APPRAISAL SERVICES M/S/C (Stone/Craton) to recommend to the Comrnission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 07-33-126-00 to Crockett & Associates, Ltd. and Agreement No. 07-33-127-00 to Desmond, Marcelio & Amster to perform On -Call Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FF&E) Appraisal Services; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the Agreements on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager, presented the proposed budget for FY 2007/08, highlighting the following areas: Budget process Resource estimation and allocation, Commission policy goals and objectives, department goals and objectives, department; budget development, compilation of Commission budget and review and adoption of budget; Guiding policies - Mobility initiatives, goods movement, improved _ system efficiency, environmental stewardship, Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes April 23, 2007 Page 4 • economic development, intermodalism and accessibility, public and agency communications, and financial and administration; Budget summary - Beginning fund balance, total estimated sources, total estimated uses, uses over sources, and ending fund balance; Revenues, revenue breakdown, and revenue trends; Expenditures, expenditure breakdown by department and function, and expenditure highlights; Personnel cost trends; Measure A administration = Administrative salaries and benefits up to 1 % of Measure A sales tax revenues and Commission policy for .total administration costs not to exceed 4% of Measure A sales tax revenues; and Next steps - Receive input for proposed budget, open public hearing on May 9, finalize budget and related document, review final budget draft, and close public hearing and adopt the final budget at the June 13, 2007 Commission meeting. At Commissioner Stones request, Michele Cisneros clarified that the approximately 25 % decrease in investment income, budgeted compared to projected for FY 2006/07, is the result of a decrease in Transportation Uniform Mitigation" Fee (TUMF) revenues. Commissioner Steve Adams requested a comparison of .the .drop in building permits in Riverside County and its neighboring counties as he is concerned that the TUMF may be discouraging builders. Michele Cisneros explained that the TUMF is administered by Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and she will request that information. Commissioner Bob Magee urged caution when increasing staff and requested clarification on the timeline to fill the positions and if all positions will be filled. Michele :Cisneros responded that it is the intention of . staff to fill the new positions through FY 2008, based on the needs of the 1 0-Year Western Riverside County Highway Delivery Plan. Commissioner: Magee requested clarification on the SR-74project between 1-15 and ` 7``' Street listed on page 31 of the FY 2007/08 Proposed 'Budget's Executive Summary as he thought this project was complete. He asked about the Location of SR-74 curve realignment project. • • Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes April 23, 2007 Page 5 Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, replied that these funds are to complete the right-of-way acquisition process and construction management activities after the project is open. Cathy Bechtel, Project Delivery Director, provided additional information on the funds to close out the SR-74 project as there is clean up work and some mitigation lands that the Commission is working to acquire. With regard to the SR,-74/1-215 interchange, the environmental stage is near completion with final design to follow. The SR=74 curve realignment project is located in the Hemet area, was identified in the 1989 Measure A, and has not been started. Chair Gibbs requested clarification on page 17 of the FY 2007/08 Proposed Budget's Executive Summary that states "other revenue reflects a 52 decrease from projected FY 2006/07 revenues as a result of the proceeds received from sales of properties in FY 2006/07" and page 24 under Table 13 — Transit; Projects and Operations the percent change is 1276.1 %. Theresia Trevino replied that in FY 2006/07, the Commission sold significant properties and realized significant proceeds on those properties, which are not anticipated to occur next fiscal year with the 'level of properties that will be sold. Michele. Cisneros responded that with regard to Table 13, staff included the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) in the FY 2007/08 budget for the first time, which caused a significant change. M/S/C (Stone/Adams) to recommend to the Commission. to: 1) Discuss, review and provide guidance on the proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2005-2006; 2) Open the public hearing in order to receive input and comments on the proposed FY 2007/08 Budget on May 9, 2007 and on June 13 2007 and close the public hearing with adoption of the FY 2007/08 Budget on June 13, 2007. 11. RECURRING CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, reviewed the recurring contracts for FY 2007/0.8. These contracts are classified as such primarily 'because they either are a sole source or have a unique relationship with: the Commission. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes April23, 2007 Page 6 Commissioner Ron Roberts requested clarification on the recurring contracts with Ray Gorski and Best, Best and Krieger due to the proposed increase for both. He suggested that staff consider releasing a request for ..proposal for legal services in the future. In his experience, the agency selects the existing consultant and achieves a lower cost. Theresia Trevino responded that there is an additional need for Ray Gorski's services that attributed to the increase. With regard to. Best, Best :and Krieger, the increase is primarily reflective of the additional highway projects that are included in next year's budget and services related to the legislation being° proposed. At the Commission's direction, staff could release a request for proposal. M/S/C (Adams/Craton) to recommend to the. Commission to: 1) Approve the Recurring Contracts for Fiscal Year :2007/08; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 12. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Cathy Bechtel, Project Delivery Director, presented the request from city of Lake Elsinore (Lake Elsinore) for an extension on its FY 2006 projects and to combine those with the improvement projects it will be .doing this fiscal year. Commissioner Magee stated that Lake Elsinore is improving sidewalks in order to improve the safety for school children: walking to and from school. He requested the Committee support the request. M/S/C (Magee/Adams) to recommend to the Commission to grant the city of Lake Elsinore an extension to. June 30, 2008 to complete the Mohr Street, Sumner Avenue and La Strada Street sidewalk improvement projects. 13. STATE 'AND .FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE John Standiford, Public Affairs Director, provided an ;update on AB 1295 (Spitzer), AB 1240 (Benoit), and SB 974 (Lowenthal). He then discussed federal transportation issues and a supplemental appropriations bill. M/S/C (Magee/Adams) to recommend to the Commission to receive and file the state and federal legislative status report, Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes April 23, 2007 Page 7 14. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR There were no items were pulled from the consent calendar for discussion. 15. COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS/STAFF There were no Commissioner or staff reports. 16. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Budget and Implementation Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:18 a.m. The next meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee is scheduled for June 25, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON. BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE Monday, June 25, 2007 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Budget and .Implementation Committee was called to order by Chair Rick Gibbs at 9:34 a.rn., in the Board Room at ;the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At this time, Commissioner Steve Adams led the Budget and Implementation Committee in a flag salute. 3. ROLL CALL Members/Alternates Present Steve Adams ` Roger Berg Alex Bias. Mary Craton Rick Gibbs Bob Magee Ron. Roberts Jeff Stone John Tavaglione Members Absent Joseph DeConinck Eduardo Garcia Barbara Hanna Gordon Moiler Gregory Pettis 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS . There were no requests to :speak from the public. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 26, 2007 M/S/C (Adams/Craton) to approve the minutes of February 26, 2007 as submitted. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 25, 2007 Page 2 ADDITIONS_ / REVISIONS There was a revision to Agenda Item 14, "Award of a Consultant Services Agreement to the First Ranked Consultant Team to Provide Preliminary Engineering Services,Project Reports and Environmental Documents for the. Interstate 215 Corridor from the I-215/1-15 Interchange to Nuevo Road in the City of Perris". 7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s). requests separate action on >specific itern(s) Items pulled from the Consent .Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. M/S/C (Stone/Craton) to approve the following Consent Calendar item(s): -7A.- TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT 1) Receive and file the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial Program Quarterly Report; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAMMING REQUEST FOR STATE ROUTE 79, THOMPSON ROAD TO DOMENIGONI PARKWAY PROJECT - PHASE l Shirley Medina, Program Manager, provided an, update on the county of Riverside's SR-79 widening project from Thompson Road to Domenigoni Parkway and presented the county of Riverside's request to prograrn: Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF).- Regional Arterial funds on the project. Commissioner Jeff Stone expressed how important this final segment is :for this transportation corridor. M/S/C (Stone/Adams) to: 1) Approve the: `county of °Riverside's request to program $4 million of Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial funds. on the SR-:79,' Thompson Road' to Domenigoni Parkway widening project for , Phase I construction from Thompson Road to Whispering Heights Parkway; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. " " Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 25, 2007 Page 3 9. CITY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAMMING REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE VAN BUREN BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE AT STATE ROUTE 91 - RIGHT-OF-UVAY PHASE Shirley Medina provided an overview on the SR-91 /Van Buren Boulevard interchange project and presented the city of Riverside's request to program additional TUMF Regional Arterial funds on the project. M/S/C (Tavaglione/Adams) to: 1) Approve the city of Riverside's request to increase the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial funds for right-of-way on the SR-91 /Van Buren Boulevard interchange project from $2 million to $8-million; 2) Approve an increase for expenditures of $ 6,00.0,000 in the FY 2007/08 budget; 3) Amend the TUMF agreement; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. FISCAL YEAR 2008-12 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS Jerry Rivera, Program Manager, briefly reviewed the FY 2008-2012 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads, noting that not all of the cities have submitted the required documents. He also noted that since the mailing of the agenda, the cities of Cathedral City and Riverside have submitted their plans. M/S/C (Stone/Roberts) to: 1) Approve the FY 20.08-12 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) for Local Streets and Roads as submitted; and; 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 25, 2007 Page 4 11. FISCAL YEAR 2007-11 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITY OF`COACHELLA Jerry Rivera briefly reviewed the FY 2007-201 1 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the city. of Coachella. M/S/C (Adams/Craton) to: 1) Approve the FY 2007-11 Measure . A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for local streets and roads for the city of Coachella as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 12. FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Jerry Rivera presented the FY 2007/08 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program funding recommendations. Commissioner Ron Roberts requested that the project name for the city of Temecula be corrected to Santa Gertrudis Creek. M/S/C (Adams/Roberts) to: 1) Approve the FY 2007/08 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian. Facilities Program recommended funding as shown on the attached schedule; and 2) forward to the Commission for final action. 13. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION REVIEW COMMITTEE AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO FUND NEW FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL SEGMENTS Brian Cunanan, Staff Analyst, provided an overview of the funding agreement with Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) to extend : the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) and fund Beat Nos. 7 and 19 within Riverside County. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 25, 2007 Page 5 M/S/C (Adams/Stone) to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 07=45-132-00 with the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) for $825,000 to fund two new Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) beats; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 14. AWARD OF A CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT TO THE FIRST RANKED CONSULTANT TEAM TO PROVIDE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES, PROJECT REPORTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE INTERSTATE 215 CORRIDOR FROM THE 1-215/1-15 INTERCHANGE TO NUEVO ROAD IN THE .CITY OF PERRIS Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director, provided an overview of the request for statements of qualifications from transportation, environmental and engineering consultants to develop a pre -qualified ranked list of up to five consultant teams to be used to assist the Commission with preliminary engineering services required for project reports and environmental documents for proposed improvements to 1-10, 1-215, and SR-91, and other various projects. M/S/C (Stone/Craton) to: 1) Approve the selection and retain the top five .ranked consultant teams as partof a pre -qualified ranked list to be used to assist the. Commission with preliminary engineering services required for the preparation, to final approval, of separate project reports (PR) and environmental documents (ED) for proposed improvements to 1-10, 1-215, . and State Route 91, for four IVleasure A projects and one on -call project, in Western Riverside County, which are proposed to be delivered in the first five years of the 2009 Measure A 10-Year Delivery Plan. .The. list will, be valid for a one year duration; 2) Award a consultant services agreement to the first ranked consultant team to provide preliminary engineering services for the preparation of Caltrans PR/ED for ` the proposed improvements to the 1-215 corridor-, from the 1-215/1-15 Interchange to .Nuevo Road in the city of Perris. At this time, staff is negotiating with the 1" ranked consultant team and staff expects to; complete negotiations and bring a final contract at the July. 11, 2007 Commission meeting; Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 25, 2007 Page 6 3) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to. execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 4) forward to the Commission for final action. 15. AWARD OF A CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT TO PARSONS BRINCKERHOFf TO PREPARE A PROJECT REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT, FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 241 TO PIERCE STREET, A STATE ROUTE 91 /INTERSTATE 15 MEDIAN . DIRECT CONNECTOR AND INTERSTATE 15 MEDIAN WIDENING FROM STATE" ROUTE 91 TO CAJALCO ROAD Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director, provided: an overview of the consultant services agreement to Parson Brinckerhoff for the g project report and environmental document on the SR-91 project. In response to Commissioner Bob Magee's question regarding environmental services for 1-15 from Cajalco Road to SR-74, Anne Mayer explained the option for that work is included in the package that Hideo Sugita ` presented in Agenda Item 14 and provided a timeline for that work. M/S/C (Tavagtione/Craton) to: 1) Approve the selection process and award a consultant services Agreement No. 08-31-001-00 to Parsons Brinckerhoff to perform preliminary engineering services and prepare a Caltrans project report (PR) and environmental docurnent (ED) for . the development of proposed improvements to the SR-91 corridor, from SR-241 to Pierce Street, including the proposed addition of a northbound (NB) to eastbound (EB) SR-91/1-15 median direct connector and proposed improvements to 1-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road. At this time the contract is stillin negotiations and staff expects to bring .a final . contract to the Commission meeting 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3)' Forward to the Commission for final action. " Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 25, 2007 Page 7 16. AGREEMENT WITH DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND COST ESTIMATE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STATE ROUTE 74/INTERSTATE 215 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE CITY OF PERRIS Hideo Sugita provided background information on SR-74/I-215 interchange improvement project in the city of Perris. The agreement is to secure the services of a consultant to perform final design. M/S/C (Stone/Craton) to: 1) Approve the selection process and award consultant Agreement No. 07-31-122-00 to David Evans and Associates, Inc. to perform final engineering services and prepare plans, specifications, and cost estimate (PS&E) for the construction of the SR-74/1-215 Interchange improvement project in the city of Perris based on the attached project scope, schedule and cost for the base amount of $ 2,091,662 plus a contingency amount of $ 218,338 (1.0.4%), to cover potential changes in scope for a total not to exceed amount of $2,310,000; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director . or his designee to approve contingency work as may be required for the project; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. 17. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE John Standiford, Public Affairs Director, provided an update on the state budget, Proposition 1 B, AB 1295 (Spitzer), AB 1467 (Nunez), and HR 2701 (Oberstar). M/SIC (Craton/Adams) to: 1) Approve the following bill position: HR 2701 - MONITOR; 2) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 18. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR No items were pulled from the consent calendar for discussion. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes June 2.5, 2007 Page 8 19. COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS/STAFF . 19A. Commissioner Mary Craton requested staff provide an update on the improvements on the Newport Road/I-215 interchange due to the commercial development that is being built. Eric Haley replied that staff will provide an update, including the developer financed improvements. Commissioner Stone noted that it is his understanding that funding mechanisms are in place with respect to the developer. 19B.. Mr. Haley announced: • Agency Secretary Dale Bonner came to Ontario, CA on June 21, 2007 to meet with San Bernardino, Desert Valley and Riverside County interests concerning grade -:separations and goods movement projects; • An article in the North County Times on San Diego Association of Governments' Regional Plan, specifically in regard to toll lanes; The Blaine Street Bridge ribbon cutting will be held on August 24, 2007; and • Measure A revenues have substantially declined. 19C. Chair Gibbs commended staff on the quality and thoroughness of its reports, which' is confirmed by the number of questions asked by Commissioners. He then announced that city of Murrieta passed its Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and will be submitting it to the Commission for approval. 20 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration . by the Budget and Implementation Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 1,0:11 -a.m. The next meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee is scheduled for August 27, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele_ Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief financial Officer SUBJECT: Interfund Loan Activity Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the :Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Interfund Loan Activity Report for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2007; and 2) forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its April 14, 2004 meeting, the Commission a pproved. the Interfund Loan Policy and_` adopted 'Resolution No.'- 04=006 "Resolution of the - Riverside: County Transportation Commission to Authorize lnterfund Loans". Subsequently, the Commission requested that the interfund loan activity be reported on a quarterly basis. The attached report includes all interfund loan activity through March 31, 2007. The total outstanding interfund loan amounts as of June 30, 2007 are $361,607. Attachment: Interfund Loan Activity 'Report Agenda Item 7A Riverside County Transportation Commission Interfund Loan Activity Report For 4th quarter ended June 30, 2007 Loan Amount Repayment Amount Date Commission Date of Loan . of Loan Begins Outstanding Lending Fund a Borrowing Fund Purpose of Loan Approved April.2, 2003 $ 300,000 July 1, 2006 $ 86,607 Measure A - WC Highway (222) Measure A - WC LSR (227) Advance to make repairs and March 12, 2003 improvements to Railroad Canyon Road March 4, 2004 275,000 July 1, 2009 275,000 Measure A - WC Commuter Assistance Measure A - WC Highway (222) Additional local match for the SR71 December 10, 2003 (226) Y' Widening/Animal Crossing Project Total $ 575,000 $ 361,607 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2007; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached are the quarterly investment and cash flow reports as required by state law and Comission `policy. lib county-of==Ri.verside's`-Invest mmerit: Report for the month ended June 30, 2007 is also attached for review. Attachments: 1) Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter ended June 30, 2007 2) County of Riverside Investment Report for the Month ended June 30, 2007 Agenda Item 7B " Treasury% 13{Ila 0.39 Corporate Notes 0.20% County PooVCeart 66.6696 Port/ono lnvastmorlt Typa Federat AperlCy Notaa 1.02% "Cenlflcete of Oepoa{t 0.79% LAIF 0.65% Mvt6val 2F%vnda .6 Investment Aoroemenla 3.09% Statement of Compliance All of the above investments and any investment decisions made for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 were in full compliance with the Commission's investment policy as adopted on April 11, 2007. The Commission has adequate cash flows for six months of operations. Signed bye Chief Financial Officer " Riverside County Transportation Commission Investment Portfolio Report Period Ended: June 2007 RATING COUPO PAR PURCHASE MATURITY YIEILD TO , PURCHASE UNREALIEZED FAIR VALUE MOODYS/FITCH_ N VALUE DATE DATE MATURITY COST MARKET VALUE GAIN (LOSS) OPERATING FUNDS City National Bank Deposits $ 31,899 A3/BBB+ WA County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund 383,878,783 Aaa/MR1/AAA/V+1 N/A Local Agency Investment. Fund (LAIF) 3,288,224 Not Rated N/A Agency/Treasury Securities: Money Market Mutual Funds " CNI Charter 437,048 AAA/AAA N/A 437,046 4,68% 437,046 437,046 - Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) Note-cs 2.245,073 AAA/AAA 4.750% 2,250,000 11/15/05 11/09/07 4.80% 2,242,575 2,245,073 2,498 US Treasury Note-noncallable 1,994,840 AAA/AAA 4.375% 2,000,000 02/02/06 12/31/07 4.90% 1,992,734 1,994,840 2,106 FHLMC Reference Note-noncallable 1,996,260 AAA/AAA 4.000% 2,000,000 02/02/06 08/17/07 4.00%� 1,975,974 1,996,260 20,286 FNMA Note -callable 1,996,880 AAA/AAA 5.125% 2,000,000 02/02/06 01/18/08 5.40% 2,000,000 1,998,880 (3,120 FHLB Note-noncallable 1,993,760 AAAIAAA 4.850% 2,000,000 02/06/06 02106/08 5.40% 2,000,000 1,993,760 6, 1,004;920 (21,93D240 General Electric Capital Corp Med Term Note-noncallat 1,004,920 AAA/AAA 6.500% 1,000;000 02/06/08 12/10/07 6.50% 1,026,850 RABOBANiC Negotiable CD 3,997,880 AAA/A+1 5.310�h 4,000,000 02/15/07 02115l08 5.31 �h 4,000 000 3,997,880 2,1.20 Subtotal Operating Funds 382,663,344. $. 15,687,046 ###f## !# . $ 15,666;658 FUNDS HELD IN County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund: Local Transportation Fund Subtotal Funds Held in Trust INVESTMENT WITH CITIES (1) City of Canyon Lake 77,513,222 Aaa-MR1/AAAN+1 N/A 77,513,222 65,044 N/A 4.750% $ 300,000 . , ; 04/02/03 Subtotal_ Investment with cities 65,044 N/A 5.15% N/A 5.15% 06/01/09 N/A COMMISSION BOND PROJECT FUNDS/DEBT RESERVE First American Treasury Obligations Fund 8,195,798 Aaa/AAAm N/A Investment. Agreement 15,613,532 N/A 6.000% $ 15,926,000 05/24/05 11/29/07 4.80% First American Government Obligation Fund 25,071.243 Aaa/AAAm N/A First American Treasury Obligations Fund - Held in Trut - Aaa/AAAm N/A Subtotal Bond Project Funds/Debt Reserve 48,880,573 TOTAL All Cash and Investments $ 509,122,183 Investment Transactions.for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2007 Purchases:.. None Par Value at Coupon Maturities: " Maturity Maturity Date Rate Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Note-noncallable $ 3,000,000 06/29/07 4.010% Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Note-noncallable $ 3,000,000 04/27/07 4.125% FHLB Construction Bond" noncallable $ 2,000,000 06/20/07 3.625% N/A N/A 15,613,532 $ (312,468) SUMMARIZED INVESTMENT TYPE Banks County Pool LAIF $ 31,699 441,189,984 3,288,224 Mutual Funds: CNI Charter 437,046 First American Treasury Obligations " Fund- Trust 8,195,798 First American Government Obligation Fund 25,071,243 Sub - Total Mutual Funds 33,704,086 Federal Agency securities Certificates of Deposit 'U.S. Treasury securities ;Corporate Note/Commercial Paper. Investment Agreements 8,231,973 3,997,880 1,994,840 1,004,920 15,678,576 TOTAL 509,122,183 (1) Investment with cities Is reported as a loan receivable for financial reporting. purposes. Investment Objectives • Safety o, f Principal • Liquidity' Public Trust Maximum Rate 'of -:. Return County Administrative Center LL ummer Rate Wave" The summer heat is not the only thing rising this June. tong term • interest rates had a huge jump in yields this month. The 10 year Treasury jumped over 35 bps._from a low of 4.92% on June 4th to a high of 5.30% on June 12th,- which will likely furtherincrease the - pressures in the housing market. This trend is very similar with the 2 year Treasury as well, with a jump of almost 14 bps. from a low Of 4.97% to a high of 5.10%. This move was hard on the heels of former FED Chairman Alan Greenspan predicting higher=rates were;imminent; so much for "old • soldiers just fade ,away". Some of :this :increase is due to positive economic news here in the U.S. Moreover, an increase in interest . rates. overseas . has • put pressure on U.S. interest rates to keep pace with foreign central banks, as well as remaining competitive in a tight market; a Very large . number of buyers of U.S. Treasury ;debt are foreign central banks.,=.. : = ::.::_ For the ninth consecutive meeting, the-FOMC left rates unchanged at 5.25% on. their June 28th meeting, maintaining an inflation risk, bias. However, the FED statement after the meeting was less hawkish than earlier meetings; it still appears thatinflation is the FED's predominant concern. Rates have moderated since their highs mid -month and are now closer to levels seen at the begin-. ning of June. The overall trend could continue upwards, barring any further problems as a result of the subprime mortgage market meltdown, as rates continue to increase .abroad... In the long run, the Pool yield will benefit if this should occur. kt c Paul McDonnell Treasurer -Tax Collector Durable Goods Orders -released on June 27th -2:8%actual vs. -1.5%survey . Gross Domestic Product (GDP) -released, on June 28th .7% actual vs.:8% survey Consumer Confidence— Index- released on June 26th 103.9 actual vs. 105 survey Factory Orders -released on July 3rd -.5% actual vs. -1.2% survey Employment Situation-, - released on June 1st .Unemployment 4.5% actual vs. 4.5% survey Nonfarm payrolls .M/N1 change 157,000 actual vs:135,000 survey Consumer Price Index- released .op June 150.7% actual vs..6% survey; Core CPI.1% actual vs:.2% survey At .month's end,. the Fed Funds rate remained at 5.25%. Then year T=Note was yielding 4.87% (down 5bps) while the 10 year T-Note was yielding 5.03%. (up 13bps). For June, the Pool had an increase of -1 bp._ in .the average monthly yield. Portfolio Statistics : Month -End Book Value June $ 4,757,119,372 May $4,999,179,741 April $5,484,286,694. March .:: $4,700,110,339 February: $4,552,435,696 January $4,534,811,540 Month -End Market Value" $ 4,752,010,568 $4,993,963,302 $5,483,370,456- $4,697880,401 $4,550,957,799 $4,528,343,596 Paper Gain or (Loss) $ (5,108,805) $ (5,216,439) $ (916,238) $ (2,229,938) $ (1,477,897) $ (6,467,944) Percent of Paper Gain or Loss -0.11% -0.10% -0.02% -0.05% ,-0.03% -0.14%0`. Yield Based upon Book Value 5.17 5.16 5.13 5.09 5.05 5.02 Weighted Average Maturity (Yrs) 1.14 1.07 0.99 0.96 0.94 0.95 Modified Duration 1.06 ! 0.99 0.91 ... 0.88 0.87 0.88 values do not Include acaved in • THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED INVESTMENT FUND 1S CURRENTLY RATED: Aaa/MR1 BY MOODY'S INVESTOR SERVICES AAA/V1+ BY FITCHRATINGS Portfolio Characteristics SECTOR Federal Agency Market Value 2,802,711,103 Cash Equivalent & MMF 252,000,000 Commercial Paper 668,892,334 Negotiable CDs 700,005,131 Medium Term Notes 284,051,238 Municipal Bonds Certificates of Deposit 18,655,762 20,000,000 Local Agency Obligation . Total 5,695,000 4,752,010,568 . 30 days or Less 30 - 90 Days —' 90 Days =1Year Municipal,' Certificates Bonds of Deposit 0.39% 0.42% Local Agency Obligation 377,637, 377 1,090,334771 1,187,063,189 706,506,413 1,383,758,617 12 Month Gross Yield Trends CREDIT QUALITY Market Value Federal Agency 2, 802, 711,103 . AAA 475, 707, 000 A-1 / P-1 or better 1, 368, 897, 465 N/R Total 104, 695, 000 4, 752, 010, 568 30- 90 90 bays - 1 -.2 Days 1 Year Years * Treasurers Institutional Money. Market Index (TIMMI), A compiled and reported by the Riverside County Treasurer`s tapdaf Markets division. It is a composite index derived hum the average of three multi-bilion dollar AM rated Prime (funds that invest in a diversified portfolio of U.S. dollar denominated m, ortey market instruments including U.S. Treasuries, govemmen; agencies, -bankers' acceptances, commercial paper, certificates of deposrts, repurchase agreements, etc) portfolios that the Treasurer tracks. Further details available upon request. Page 1 7 Market Data 06/29/07 .05/31/07 DJIA•- 13408.6,., 13,627.6 S&P 500 1,563.35 1,536.62 NASDAQ 2,603.23 .2,604.52 Crude Oil (barrel) 70.68. 64.01 Gold (ounce) 650.90 656.95 Prime Rate. 8,25% 8.25% 3-Month LIBOR 5:36% • 5.36 % Fed Fund Futures (for 07/07) 5.245% 5.225% 06/29/07 05/31/07 Diff. 3 M 4.82 4.73 09 6M 4.93 4.96 • -.03 2 Y_ ,..., _. 4.87 4.92 5 Y 4.92 4.86 .06 10Y 5.03 '4.90 .13 30 Y 5.12 5.01 .11 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund June 29, 2007 Month End Portfolio Holdings Report CUSiP PAR . DESCRIPTION CASH - UBOC DEPOSIT ACCOUNT »° aloe•: 25,000,000.00 CLTR - CALTRUST SHORT TERM FUND 54,000,000.00 CPD - COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 6556Niu68 ?a,s,,' 10,721,000.00 BNP PARIBAS FIN A1+/P1 4497W1UA2 14,000,000.00 ING A1+/P1 36959JV18 89233HVF8 2254EBVX6 4497W 1 W69 0556N1WS8 59018KX14 40427SXR5 50,000,000.00 GE CAPITAL Al+/P1 50,000,000.00 TOYOTA MOTOR A1+/P1 50,000,000.00 11,000,000.00 40 000,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE Mi./Pi ING Al+/P1 BNP PARIBAS A1+/P1 50,000,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH Al+/P1 50,000,000.00 HSBC USA INC A1+/P1 it .:a n 680,721,000.00 FFCB - FED FARM CREDIT BANK' 31331SR62 10,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2YrNc3Mo 31331SMQ3 5 000,000.00FED FARM CREDIT BANK2.5YrNc6Mo 31331SMN0 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2.75YrNc9M 31331XLZ3 �,31V 31331VAE6 f'8,6 £47 54 3,5 L°I^w'd's` s,an 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 1YrNc 7;500,000.00 FED FARM CREDITBANK2.5YrNc3Mo ,w.nu-.�--.,•.e,x�cx>nrmzmu?m..a.KKae�[ar�x�xt+.xEk�e:,x«'ees.�:.. _ - - � � a� 31331SWM1 5 000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK3YrNc1Yr 31331VLG9 31331SD42 �5 31331SQ63 . 31331S4V2 31331V6V3 31331XLY6 31331XXT4 31331XZC9 TFx`x�: 31331XMB5 31331XUB6 k i� 31331XVL3 31331XWX6 5,000 000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2.4Nc 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK3YrNc1 Yr1X 10,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANk3YrNc3Mo eke i �rt `d 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK3YrNc1Yr1X 10,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 2YrNc1Yr v w ?.k ".7A' 5 000 000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 2YrNc 7,469,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 2YrNc3Mo k.... .2> z� 10 000,000:00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 2YrNc1Yr {$8➢�{YR�. 3x Y.i,.S�.'i §,ri i��� ¢�'�i.'{'�t �iS COUPON MATURITY 5.20 07/06/2007 BOOK VALUE' f PRICE I M. VALUE' GAIN/LOSS YLD MAT M Dur. Avg. Lifez 25,000,000.00 3§ FCr§ 54,000,000.00 10,566,141.11 9856 5.22 07/1D/2007_ 13,815,270.00 98.68 08/01/2007 48,680,875.00 97.36 5519 08/15/2007 48,575,500.00 97.15 08/31/2007 49,017,777.78 98.04 09/06/2007 10,762,583.33 97.84 ' h w 09/26/2007._ _ _ _ 39,121,950.00 520 10/01/2007 25,000,000.00 5.17 0.08 0.09 54,000,000.00 8 y, 10,568,141.11 13 815,270 00 48,680.875.00 5.29 0,08 5.28 0.02 0.09 0.02 5.29 - 0,03 0.03 5.33 0.09 0.09 5.34 0.12 0.13 a .n 5.30 0.17 0.17 } 5.20 0.18 0.19 5.28 0.24 0.24 228 833.33 5.29 5.18 10/25/2007 49,111,666.67 98.68 48,696,930.58 98.33 48,575,500.00 49,017,777.78 10,762,583.33 �'ip°tk• I 39,121,950.00 49 340,5 49,180,500.00 r-; 469,569.44 0.25 0.26 5.29 0.31 0.32 666,707,742.37 4.18 07/20/2007 10,000,000.00 100.00 668,892,334.03 10,000,000.00 i 3.85 08/10/2007 5 000,000.00 100.00 5 000 000.00 ��3�.70 11/09/2007 5,000,000.00 99.4`1'§��'; 4,970,300.00 •aii'A'„>. , ,l-kb^{.a...�°✓�.y �'.Y�"�......2,os4:;'£'„.'£; 5.13 01/18/2008 4,997,200.00. 99.84 4,992,200.00 7,495,312.50 99.41 7455,450.00 423 05/09/2008 5,000,000.00 99.09 4.70 05/23/2008 5,000,000.00 99.47 4.13 08/30/2008 4.48 07/21/2008 ;Y 4.62 09/08/2008 �.. r. • 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 3YNc1Yr1X 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 3YrNc1Yr 5,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 3YrNc1Yr ,LsA5:411 iN.: 10,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 3YrNc1Yr 5.13 10/10/2008 5.01 01/22/2009 5.25 05/07/2009 5.14 05/22/2009 525 .01/25/2010 5.15 04/09/2010 5.20 04/16/2010 520 04/30/2010 5,000,000.00 98.88 e`trPtr r., 9 993.750.00 99.19 s i�rY� 4 998 437.50 9,997,100.00 4,997 150.00 99.22 99.69 99.66 7 466 012.40 99.72 10,000 000.00 99.66 5,000,000.00 99.75 5,000,000.00 4 995,150.00 99.34 99.50 10.000,000.00 99.44 4,973,450.00 4,943,750.00 9,918,800.00 4 960 950.00 X:" 9,968,800.00 4 982 800.00 7,448,012.11 Y.- 9 965 600.00 4,987,500.00 4,987,200.00 4,975,000.00 9,943,800.00 eN 2,184,591.66 4 %4 529 0.18 0.18 4.18 0.06 0.06 3.65 0.11 0.12 29,700.00 3.70 , 0.35 0.36 5,000.00 5.18 , 0.53 0.56 39,862.50 4.57 , 0.72 0.75 45 300.00 423 0.83 0.86 28,550.00 4.70 56,250.00 74,950.00 37 487.50 §p 9 28,300.00 14 350.00 18,00029 34.400.00 12...,$$5�00.0_0 32,800.00 20,150.00 �Fko,'mxis�M13 f .';' 56,200.00 4.13 4.50 7,4 4.63 5.14 5.04 0.95 1.01 1.13 1.21 1.48 5.27 1.73 :y, 5.14 1.78 �r'+s 5.25 2.33 5.15 5.24 5.20 2.53 2.55 2.59 1.01 1.06 1.20 1.28 1.57 1.88 1.90 K 2.58 2.78 2.80 2.84 260,219,000.00 FHLB - FED HOME LOAN BANK x 3133XGDE1 3133XGGC2 3; 5,000000.00 FED HOME LOANBANK1YrNc 10,000,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK1YrNc 3a1�33xjqu5 5,000,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK 1.5YrNc3Mo 3133XAQ26 8,155,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK 2.5YrNctYri 5,000,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BA/4K1.5YrNc3Mo 10,000,000.00 FED HO/t4E LOAN BANK2.5YrNc1Yr 5,000,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK2YrNc1Mo 5,000,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK2YrNc1Yr1X z.'5.;�iwv. 5.50 07/20/2007 5.38 08/01/2007 .f 5.30 08/15/2007 3.75 08/24/2007 5.04 09/06/2007 -94 260,136,744.82 4,998,300.00 99.97 10,000,000.00 100.00 S 5,003,000.00 100.00 8,155,000.00 100.00 259,050,677.03 4 998 300.00 10,000 000.00 5.000,000.0o 8,155,000.00 (1,086,067.79) 4.79 1.23 1.33 5.54 0.06 0.06 5.38 ..gy0.�.09 0.09 5.30 0.12 0.13 3.75 0.15 0.15 5.04 0.18 r3.19 4.00 0.23 .0.24 4.35 0.24 0.25 4.54 0.28 0.29 titio boo oo 100.00 10 000 000 00 100.00 5,000 000.00 99.75 5 000 000 00 10 000 000 00 4,987,500.00 12,500.00 Month End Portfolio Holdings Report 3133XHF80 DESCRIPTION 10,000,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK3YrNc1YrBERM 5.05 10/23J2009 10,D00,000.00 PRICE I 99.41 M.VALUE' 9,940,800.00 59,400.00 . 5.05. 2.14 2.32 I 31,33XHLL4 10,000,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK3YrNc1.5Yr1X 525 11102l2009 10,000,000:00 99.75 9,975,000.00 25,000.00 5.25' 2.16 2.35 3133XHG97 . 5,000 000.00 :FED HOME LOAN BANK3YrNc6Mo 5.50 11/03/2009 4,998 750.00 99.88 4,993;750.00 5,000.00 5.51.. 2.15 2.35. 3133XHS94 : 5 000,000:00 fED HOME LOAW BANK3YrNcfYr1X 5.25 11/13/2009 4,995,000.00 99.81 4,990,650.D0 4,350.00 5.29 2.19 2.38 i 3133XJ2E7 30,000,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK 3YrNc1Mo 5.32 12/22/2009 30,000,000.00 99.66 29,896.800.00 103,200,00) 5 32 2.29 2.48 31.33XJHL5 15 000 000.00 FED HOMEtOAN BANK 3YrNc3Mo 5.50 .01/26/2010 15,000,000.00 99.88 14,981 78,750.00 _ 5.50 2.32 2.58 3133XK4F9 15,000,D00.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK 3YrNc1Mo 5.50 :03/OS/2010 xxras. . 15,000 000.00 99.84 14 978 600.00 23,400.00 5.50 2.42 2.68 I 3133XJYE2 : 10,000,000.00 fED HOME LOAN BANK 3YrPIc6Mo 5:50 03/12/2010 10,000,000.60 99.81. 9,981,300.00 18,700.00 5.50 2.� 70 ` i" 3133XKGU3 S,D00,000:00 fED HOME LOAN BANK 3YrNc2YrtX 5.03 04/16/2010 S,OD0;000.00 99.34 4,967,200.00 32,800.00 .5.03 : 2.55 2.80 3133XKLV5 15,000,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK 3YrNc1.5Yr 5.10 .04/30/2010 15,000,000.00 99.34 14,901,600.00 98,400.00 5.10 . 2.59 2.84 3t33XKQL2 12,000,000:00 FED HOME LOAN BANK 3YNc1SYr1X 5.08 05/07/2010 12,000,000.00 99.34 11 921 280-00 78,720.E)0 i5.08 2:61 2.86 3133XL4P5 5,000,000.00 FED'HOME LOAN BANK 3YrNc1Yr1X 5.30 06/04/2010 5,000,000.00 99-69 4,984,400.00 15 600.00 5.30 2:67 2:93 3133XL7H0 .5,000 000:00'FED HOMEtOAfY BANK 3YrNc2Yr1X 528 :06/11/2010 5,000 000.00 99.88 4 993 750.00 "6 50.00 5.28 . 2.69 2:95 3133XLFZ1 5 000000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK 3YrNc2Yr 5.50 OB/29/2010 5000 000.00 100.34 5 017200.00 17,200.00 5.50 2.73 3.00. 994,605,000.00 994,373,020.72 991,898;522.01 ` 5:04 1.62 1.66 FHLC -FHLB - MORTG. CERT. ,(2,474,498.71) 3128X4AT8 5,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.225YrNc1X 4.00 08/10/2007 5,000,000.00 100.00 5,000,000.00 4.00 -0.1 t 0.12 3t28X4HM6 5 000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG: CERT3YrNc1Yr1X 4.50 08Y22@007 5;000 000:00 . 100:00 MWWW!E 5,000,000.00 4.50 0.14 0.15 i 3128X4HM6 5 000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG: CERT.2YrNc1Yr1X 4.50 08/22%2007 5,000,000.00 .100.00 5,000,000.00 .4.50 .0.14 . y 0.15 3128X35Z2 10,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.2:5YrNe6Mo 4.00 09/24/2007 _. 10,0D0;000.00 100.00 10,000,000.00 4:00 0.23. .0.24 3128X4PX3 5,000 000.00 'FHLB - MORTG: CERT2YrNc1Yr1X . 4.50 10/11/2007 6 000,000.00 99.75 4,987 800.00 12 406.06 4.74, 0.28 0"28 3128X4PX3 5,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.2YrNclYriX 4.50 10/11/2007 5,000,000.00 99-75 4,987,600.00 f2,400.00 4.74- 0.26 0 28 3128X4AL5 5,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.2.SYrNc6Mo. 4.20 W. 11/09/2007 5,000,000.00 99.56 9,978,150:00 2t,850.00 4.20 0.35 0.36 . 3128X4XtJ6 10,000 OOD.00 FHLB-:MORTG..CERT.2YrNciYrtX 4.82 01/11/2008 10,000,000:0D 99.70 997020000, - 29,800.00 :'4.82'0.51 -0.54 3128X4YF2 5,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG CERT.2YrNc6Mo 5.06 . 01/28/2008 500000000 99.77 4,988 600.00 11,400.00 5.00 0.55 0.58 3128X4Y88 t5 000,000.00 fH66 - MORTG- CERT.1.75 NC3M0 5.30 01/31/2008 15,00D,000.00 99.92 14,988,160.00 1 t850.00 5.30 0-5B 0.59 3128X36H1 10,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.3YrNc6Mo 4.18 03/28/2008 10,000,000.00 99.15 w.. 9,915,400.00 84,600.00 4.18 0.72 0.75 3128X42D2 f0,000 000.00 .FHLB - MORTG. CERT2.tYrNc6Mo 5.34 05/07/2008 10,000,000.0D 99.91 9,990,500.00 9,500.00 5.34 0.82 0.86 3128X4VS7 10 000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT:2.5YrNc6Mo1 . 5.00 cHem/2008 10,0D0,000.00 00.72 9,972 300.00 27700.00 5.00 ;-0.93 0.97 3128X4DW8 5,000,000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.3YrNc iMoSte 4.50 :07/11/2008 5,000,000.00 99:66 . 4,983Q00.00 16 800.00 4.50 0.98 1.04 3128X4HK0 .5 000 000.00 FHL6 - MORTG. CERT.3YrNclYrtX 4:83 08H5/2008 4 939 00.00 99.29 4,964,600.00 25 400.00 5.28 1.07 1113 3128X4G54 10,000 000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT:2.SYrNcfiMo1 5.05 ' 08122/2008 10,000 000.00 89.75 9 974;500.00 25,500.D0 5.05 1.08 1.15, 3128X4MQl 5,000000.00fHLB-MORTG.CERL 4.48 09/19/2008 4,961,250.00 99.05 4,952,500-00 8,750.00 5.08 .1.16 - 1.23 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund June 29, 2007 Month End Portfolio Holdings Report 31211 10,000,000.00 li = Ii CERT 3YrNc1.5Yr1X 6.07 01/11/2010 SOOK VALUi 10,000,000.00 PRICE 99.40 M. VALUE' 9 940,200.00 59,800.00 5.07 2.30 2.54 . 3128X5VX3 20,000,000.00 FHLB - li CERT 3YrNc3Mo . 5.52 01/12/2010 20,000,000.00 09.82 19,964,400:00 35,600.00 5.52 2.28 2.514 3128X5XV5 10 000 000.00 FHLB - MORTG. CERT. 3YrNc3Mo 5.50 01/26/2010 10,000 000.00 99.84 084 00.00 15 800.00 5.50 2.32 2.58 ' 3128X5C55 5,000,000.00 FHLB- MORTG::CERT.,3YrNc6W 5.50 03/05/2010 5,000,000.00 99.82 4,090,900.00 9,100.00 5.50 2.42 2.68 31211 " 10,000,000.00 FHLB -MORTG'Ci3YrNc1:5Yr1X 5.05 . 03/22/2010 1Q000,000.00 99.29 9,929,100.00 70,900:00 5.05 2.49 2.73 4 990 650.00 9,350.00 4.90 040 0.42 4 996,900.00 650,06 5.36 0.42 0.43 4 987.500.00 12.500.00 Mi 4.88 0.49 0.50 4,965,950:00, 14,050.00 4.88 0.51 0.54 9,937,500:00 _ 62,500.00 4.30 0.56 0.56 4 981 50.00 18.750.00 4.75: 0.56 0.59 ' 5,000,000.00 21,900:00 5.05 0.56 0.59 9 975 000.00 25 000.00 5.00 0.63 ' . 0.67 7 927 522.20 19,663.16 5:07 0.82 0.85 19,981,200.00 15,675:00 5.30 0.88 - ;0.92 4:896,300.00 37,850.00. 5.00 0.92 0.96 5 000 000.00 - 5.70 OM1.05 4,981,250.00 11,200.00 5.32 1-06 1.13 .r 4;998,450.00 1,550:00 5.45 1.45 1.57 4 981 250.00 18,000.00 5.10 1.47 1:58 4,993,750.00 6250.00 5.25 1.47 1.59 11'840,00600 60,000.00 5.05 1.51 1.63 4 900 650.00 4%350.00 5.00. 1.59 ` 1.70 4 998 450.OD 1650.00 5.50 1.08 1.81 4 998,450.00 2,950.00 5.53 1.68 1.81 14,981,250.00 18,750.00 5.30 1.84 1.97, 9,998 900.00 3,100.00 5.37 1:85 1.98 6 802 890.45 2,109.55 5.40 1.98 2.16 `9,971,900.00 28,100.00 -. 5.25 2.671 2.25' 29 982 500.00 ?8,500:00 5.51 2.14, 2.33 4985950.00 14,050.00 5.20 221 2.40 14,957,850:00 37,800.00 5.21 3.21 2.40 9;950,OOD.00 �, 50,000.00 5.10 225 2.44 . LAU - LUUAL AULNUY UBLIUATIUN5 o,oya,uuu.uu 5,695,000.00 5,695,000.00 6.40 2.49 3.17 MMF - MONEY MARKET FUND 173,000,000.00 173,000,000.00 173,000,000.00 - 5.26 0.08 0.09 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund june 29, 2007 Month End Portfo4o Holdings Report - DESCRiPT10N 9873886D8 1350,000.00 YOSEMFTE CA�CW"��EAW�M-�3_93�=01=�ff�1,3W,216�_00100_�02�1.3%1 e . 16.00 • - 3.92 . 0.09` 6.0g 76886PAV5 1,545,000.00 RCC GO BONDS:2004B AA_/Aa3 3.63 0810t/2007 1,550,871.00 100.38 1,55%871.00 - . 3.49 0.09 0.69 797398BJ2 1000,000.00 SAN DIEGO PENSION Aae/AAA 3.88 08/15/2008 984 870.00 98.50 985 040.00 170.06 5.04 1.01 1.13 130795AB3 1,200,000.00 CA DEV TXB Al PEN Aaa/A NAAA 5.08 06101/2009 1 200,000.00 99.60 1,t95 212.00 4,788.00 5.06 . 1.80 1.93 5446443A3 2 ' ,200;000.00 'CA USD TXB 2005 D Aaa�AAAlAAA 5.08 07I01l2009 2,200,308.00 99.78 2,195,060.00 5,258.00 5:05 1.84 2:01 18i835,000:00 18,702,065.95 16,655,762.00 (46,303.96) 4.66 4.26 1-36 NCD.- NEGOTIABLE CD .. 86959E429 50,000,000.00 SVENSKA HANOELSBANKEN Aaa/AAA . " 5.30 07112/2007 50,000,623.61 100.00 50,000,623.61 5.20 0.04 . 0.04 90263KWW4 50000,000.00 UBS.AGSFAMFORDAt+/P1 529 '07/18/2007 50,000872.49 .100.00 50"000872.49 $.29 0.05.0.05 53943DX84 50,000;000.00ILLOYDS BANK Ai+IP1 5.30 O7t31l2007 50,000,7ta52D 100.00 50,000,7�20 - 5.29 0.08 0.09 78009HT90 50,000,ODO.00 ROYAL.BANK OF.CANADA AaalAAA .. 528 08l3112007 50,000,000.00 100:00 50 000,000:00 _ 5.28 ' 0.17 0.17 8911AZXY5 50 000 000.00 TORONTO DOMFNION Al+/P1 529 09112I2007 50 001 052.45 100.00 50,001-052.45 5.28 0.20 0.21 40411JFL6 50;000,000.00 H80S TREAS SRVCS Al+/py/F1+ 6.31 10115/20D7. 50,001,B51.81 100.00 50,000,OOD.00 1,861.81 5.30 0.29 0.30. , " 74977FLE8 3D,000,000.00 RABOBANKAy+IP4/Ft+ 5.30 05/07/2008 30,000,000.00 100.00 30,000,000.00 5.30 0.82 0.86 ' 700,000,00060 ... 700,006,982.63 700,005,00.82 (1,851.81) 5.29 0.19 0.20. TCD -TIME DEPOSITS .10,000,000.00 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 516 10/01/2007 10,000.000.00 100.00 10,000,000m - 5 15 D 25 0 26 20;000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000 ,000:00 - 5:18 022.. 023. TOTAL 41774,727,000.00 4,757,119,372.31 4,752,010,567.70 (5,108,804.61) .: 5.17 C06 1A4 The market value aid field of ahoit-term _ • - . . " . _... : y - money market seaeiliea aro, based on puriha- price. 2. Average life is the, ri imberof years uaW principal is ielumed ai maturity, weighted by market value. ....._ . - .. - - . "3. Local Agency Obligations have vad" rate coupons: spread to Pod..- '.,' 4. Modified Duration: The percentage prim change of a seamy for a given dime. - . - The higher the modified duration of a secvnly. the higher the risk. 13 Summary of Authorized Investments 14 THIS COMPLETES THE REPORT REQUIREMENTSOF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 53646 Page 8 " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMM/SS/ON DATE: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources. Manager. THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Quarterly Financial Statements STAFF RECOMMENDA TION: This item is for, the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2007; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Darin the g past fiscal year, staff has closely monitored the revenues and expenditures of ahe Cornmiss:ion. The attached financial statements: present the revenues _received and expenditures incurred during the fiscal year. Accrual adjustments for revenue and expenditures have been made for June 30, 20:07 and are reflected in these financial statements. The Commission will continue to make year end.. accrual adjustments depending upon materiality through August 31, 2007. The operating statement shows the sales tax revenues for the Fiscal Year at 95 % of the budget. This is -a result of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GAS'B) Statement No,. 33. GASB 33 requires sales tax revenue to :be accrued for the period in which it is collected at the point of sale. The State Board of Equalization collects the Measure A and Local Transportation Fund (L-TF) funds and remits them to the Commission after the reporting period- for the businesses. This creates a two -month lag in the receipt of revenues by the Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements reflect the revenues related to collections through April 2007.. The final accrual of revenue will 'be made once the September payment, which includes the fourth quarter clean-up adjustment pis received. On a cash basis, the Measure A and-,-LTF -sales :tax revenues are: % higher, respectively, than the same period last fiscal year. Staff -:has been closely monitoring this change in comparison to - the UCLA. Anderson Forecast and will Agenda Item 7C _ 16. report to the . Commission, if necessary action is needed to adjust the- sales tax .revenue budget for subsequent fiscal years. Federal,. state and local government reimbursements and other revenues. are on a reimbursement basis, and the Commission will receive these revenues as the. projects are completed and invoiced to the respective .agencies. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues were remitted to the Commission by Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). During the fiscal year, WRCOG remitted TUMF of $32,191,690 to the Commission. The TUMF.remittances reflect a .decrease of 62% from the same: period last year: The decrease is a direct result of the softening in the housing market. The expenditure categories are in line overall with the expectations of :the budget: Listed below are the significant capital related projects and their status: ;Highway Engineering/Construction/Right of Way/Land • State Route 60 East Junction to Interstate 215 high occupancy - vehicle Ganes connector Engineering was. delayed as a result of _ ;. pending decisions on the scope of the project: • SR-74 Curve Realignment - Engineering is pending due .to possible integration of future realignment of the SR-79 project: • 1=21:5 Bi-County Project - Engineering is, pending due,,' to. federaa approval on scope and traffic analysis. San Bernardino', 'Associated Governments. will proceed when approval is obtained: SR=91 : La. Sierra interchange - The city, of Riverside awarded a construction contract in. August 2007. Construction is expected to begin.n October 2007. • SR-91 Van Buren Interchange - City of Riverside is coordinatingi with Caltrans on alignment issues that are impacting the aright -of -way acquisition- and environmental process. When alignment issues are resolved, the city of Riverside will begin the acquisition process- and complete design engineering, which is forecasted to" be. completed by June 2008. Construction is forecasted to start in FY 2008/09: Commercial paper, proceeds remain available for, right-of-way and 1and acquisition related to .projects and mitigation as opportunities arise; the Agenda Item 7C 17 third traunche .of $15 million included in the budget as bond proceeds. has been spent and the Commission has subsequently issued a fourth traunche of $2'5 million in May .2007. Rail Engineering/Construction/Right of Way/Land Perris Multimodal Facility - Surveys were recently completed _ subsequent to year end and title searches are in .process to determine the need and location of the temporary construction easements. Once completed, property owners will be notified and we, can proceed with completing final design scheduled for December 2007. • Perris Valley Line - Preliminary engineering interviews were completed `in July 2007 and a consultant was selected. Discussions 'are in process to complete contract and cost issues. Preliminary engineering is anticipated to. begin in September 2007 after Federal Transit . Administration approval is received. North Main Corona Parking Structure - Construction was pending review of replacement parking and approval by the city of . Corona counsel. Approval was granted on May 9, 2007. State and federal fundin was -_approved-, July.:2007.-and construction is chedu ed to 9= start December 2007. TUMF Engineering/Construction/Ri ht of Way/Land • SR-91 Green River Interchange - The final engineer's estimate resulted in a cost increase to construction and the project could not be advertised until all funding was available. Commission action was required and approved to increase the TUMF contribution amount. In addition, a decision was to be made on whether :PM 2.5 was going -to be required which delayed moving ahead with construction. Construction is currently underway. Commercial paper proceeds remain available for right-of-way and land acquisition related to projects and mitigation as opportunities arise; the third traunche of $15 million included in the budget as bond proceeds has -.been spent and the Commission has subsequently issued a fourth traunche of $25 million in May 2007. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 4TH QUARTER FOR TWELVE MONTHS ENDED 6/30/2007 REMAINING PERCENT DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL BALANCE UTILIZATION Revenues Sales tax $ 171,741,917 $ 163,625,767 $ (8,116,150) 95% Federal, state & local government reimbursements 24,014,102 5,061,056 (18,953,046) 21% Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) 42,000,000 32,191,690 (9,868,310) 77% Other revenues 24,153,975 25,119,006 965,031 104% Interest 12:509,000 15,869,013 3,360,013 127% Total revenues 274,418,994 241,866,532 (32,552,462) 88% Expenditures Administration Salaries & benefits 1,831,800 1,493,809 337,991 82% General legal services 181,600 180,757 843 100% Professional services 1,640,200 1,252,084 388,116 76% Office lease & utilities 387,300 337,696 . 49,604 87% General administrative expenditures 1,090,600 971,560 119,040 89%° Total administration 5,131,500 4,235,906 895,595 83% Programstprojects Salaries & benefits 3,140,500 2,529,075 611,425 81% General legal services 1,305,300 1,283,449 21,851 98% Professional services 4,769,378 2,665,235 2,104,143 56%u General projects 5,161,503 3,326,055 1,835,448 64% Highway engineering 6,703,977 4,402,714 2,301,263 66%° Highway construction 43,334,566 7,643,992 35,690,574 18% Highway right of way/land 31,543,600 30,791,653 751,947 98% Rail engineering 7,440,000 771,560 6,668,440 100/0 Rail construction 81237,989 1,711,175 6,526,814 21% Rail right of way 5,269,000 1,24%594 4,019,406 24% TUMF engineering 35,174,000 11,142,153 24,031,847 32% ' TUMF construction 9,607,990 9,607,988 2 100% =.: TUMF right of way =;- -107,169,500 .: - - ..5,679,111 ,101;490,389 - ;5% . Local streets & roads '_':" 59,493,300 58,206,081 1,287,219 98%° Regional arterial 14,021,400 9,138,548 4,882,852 65% Special studies 2,842,414 610,409 2,232,005 21% FSP towing 1,639,620 1,639,617 3 100% Commuter assistance 2,782,800 2,402,369 380,431 86% Property management 346,300 131,665 214,635 38% Motorist assistance 1,888,880 597,816 1,291,064 32% Rail operations & maintenance 7,547,800 7,244,536 303,264 96% STA distributions 10,685,595 - 3,423,057 7,262,538 32% Specialized transit 7,680,800 61291,426 1,389,374 82% Planning & programming services 92,200 49,730 42,470 54% Total programs/projects 377,878,412 172,539,008 205,339,403 46% Intergovernmental distribution 1,364,603 974,193 390,410 71%° Capital outlay 431,000 128,435 302,565 30% Debt service Principal 30,364,400 30,200,000 164,400 99% Interest 9,063,600 6,564,420 2,499,180 72% Cost of issuance 150,000 - 150,000 0% Total debt service 39,578,000 36,764,420 2,813,580 93% Total expenditures 424,383,515. 214,641,962 209,741,553 51% Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures (149,964,521) 27,224,570 177,189,091 18% Other financing sources/uses Operating transfer in 83,053,100 35,016,908 (48,036,192) 42% Operating transfer out 83,053,100 35,016,908 48,036,192 42% Bond proceeds 80,000,000 50,000,000 (30,600,000) 63% Total.frnancing sources/uses 80,000,000 50,000,000 (30,000,000) 53% Net change in fund balances (69,964,521) 77,224,570 147,189,091 -110% Fund balance July 1; 2006 376,727,2.34 376.727,234 - 100% Fund balance .tune 30, 2007 $ 306,762,713= $ 453,951,804 $ 147,189,091 148% 20 -p (D mOm MN (D'mM O O to d m0 m co m tq OO bm tD 10.d NM0bR l7br tDOAmbtp m-.Am O tD MN b W b m A O b m r m d po m t0 M b N M O C mr Mb 00 • O' m MN N m D O D OO d. p- W J mF O m O m N m m r b m coOr rmm M O N.A N o Lf) M A M Q rNMm tY m M b m N M r .- IA N A m m 0 0 O/ N r A aa M N fD m N O Q .O A.•-- d d O A O M M O M.tD O N m V� bclm M.'I bAA A Nr m'mNr mmdrb Nd N m .O O m. (0 O) NN A d tD pOO O N O O In N N N O h Of M L5 N b to 'm' M NrN V! r Q N •- N M d A O .- r N /� CO m N m b COQ M r b r O m m M m O O A IO N MU)a CD N A A � O ' co Go W. W tD Ati • . • • LO d O m tf) Q tD co A UD t0 N • GDA b M M A r _ mU W G y Q. N N to - - - O A N N d M N M Q N M d b M r M O v cgj A {OO) m O p M A M - r to J a WCl) m m - M M b0 O M CO) ro W m tq O O .-- b m m .'. 00 • • co - (D 00 v 9 N d a b • V T m O N N u> V Iliro M m O • r•O W O Qj CO O m aND 0 0 Ct O r A O O .Wa('J �aaU' o a v r .N N r M nv pr "j : . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . ... d - - - a QD `D W O dJ .UZ O -.- .....-. .: M A . - M O 44 . LLli m A M A m r O ID p O A' M O Z W .� W V ti' b A. NP_tD .A- N r Q O A R m m m C) m ON O M M O CD 1n dD N [7 _ OZLL M a~ - Z F 60 p. .0 • •:ad toM C N N • • . •.m • . . r . . • • • . . • • • • • . A . r O b • • . . b A • N .' m m fD d_ CD fp Li Z t0'f a Z F' m m Cl) M Cl) v (A7 N Q - Cli d Cl) tp m m b .. - b N N f b N CD a:. �. tp LL �. N 1L' - m m. K Ask" W aFZ a • O OD ... ... Z J -..LO N.I� N -.:. .._ ._. ___ co m. ...0 b 0, .. - ,-:m b - r0 - - tr M to b A O O -:M A 'N [O ..�, Cl -xJ O A co b'1 _ .. V) co.. p CO _ _ -'N - m 0 f9 `^V' f } J F''i (•) J Q Q 1`N A r Q O O b. N O O t� N U) -•O tP1 K Q; W O, M N O a W O K a a Q M . . . . d . . . . . . . of • M N 0 W IX toJKJ W 0 W 'a) adD. N to A O O - N M A N tO N w p m. A O d m C A. ' d .� W Z leW Q IL j r C� - C p in te)i - Z b A m NON bQ Q tam NfYQ A® d N(D • . • • C mM,w M b.O d m U'1 d . . • (O • A • ® ACD A'f0 tD aAOw N .A-•N m ,a CD NM M . • . . . • • • V N M aD b m, m . M I!) FZ O) Cd CD O t0 Q r O A l0A NM W Or Q mM QO d to CD co t7 �O N m N m tI�O po po 47O u+Mdm ^h to V V A N N � M m m m _ d ID M 41D st m O t9 m . 'm A . yWy U T r r NA d N r A A N N co CD N W LL N d tT V A A m t O d d 0 N N v' _ m d' ^ m O CD CD CD MOO vi Q m A � l A M Q A co m d • • • • • • • • . . • . • A • • (O • . • . N O OR O m . O m M P . m A . b M m O d. • h . • m O r r h b O d • m O iq N N M c o W m M M Q r0 r - A N tq t p O CD m W U. t9 Cl) N N t0 M :ID fA J C Z W' Nm . AmKI tD m A N m O Iq O Q tD Q A ID m b to d d N M b Cl) Iq _N CO'b b co M 't 'A tD tO tD b tq .- O! Q M r N r Q _ cv b dA M O d . . . . �.� . . • . . . O . . b • tD . . p A tD N p O 0) M M m m Iq P A m V Oi N O N d Q d N A OD N co (A tO M -0 . . m N m ^ V ® A M O M p b O !O N 'O O' O O N C- tD tp -W IL b co N - `- ti O IF O R. N O yj r r tD m _ m LL . m LL C C m C Q . @ Q EC E m c m m mm O 0 z -p C C m m - tJ `P $ C m �ggOy m 0 O S > C tr Z O C O O @ 'D 8@ M E m _ _ _ C Z. m 3 C e m m m U L z Q @ 3 7tl > m C m e m O e O 3 m N O ..0 r m - ®c� m $2 m mo�o.�y:c$.- .s n c e- wl a _ `-'.���ome` ®�maeccwO' 32- -A ®CZ m $ma e = p n mc.> m mCamc�Ec @3�tmom E mamm 5�.cL Q $'cno8 C o'wcc®m'3'.c E �-0 ao:Eo3nam Ea Je $ m M@.mmc > C oo 9-o� 'D m r C U �0@�mo- m =aka `�- - o m :c N LL'F- O- F ° @®®- C s =-mhe m o m E Ecmm@333m8O1LLLLLL- n W m C.` CtLt-_ _��� m3B" n o c- w o,- o on.E 3-a@Cm as m m e @ ._ .58- m a @.» 3 na) o e o a h.n o o� Zn.`w.ov L o.B'E.....- ma CO mm m •c -O 0 c@ W c- mm @ o aa`� . 03 � namtJROU'F- X eNt7LLU' xxxKKK F F-.FSKaf tL'Ua2KtD O12 F �U a.Q cUf.h- ttl t O O m I- Z LL iL. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA T/ON COMMISSION DATE: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and implementation Committee FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager THROUGH: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Single Signature Authority Report STAFF RECOMMENDA TION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2007, and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The attached report details all professional services and administrative contracts that°=have 'beep executed far- the --fourth -quarter ended' June 30 2007� under the single signature authority granted to the Executive Director by the Commission. The unused capacity at June 30, 2007 is $206,475. Attachment: Single Signature Authority Report as of June 30, 2007 Agenda Item 7D - - N X m 3 C31 z ao 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 a 0 M m O of rn C� o ri CD - o o o Ln T 0 U) 0 o o 0 z to CD CD. o . �O Q� a o ti T o o 0 0 0 0 0 to v 0 0 0 p o o M G a �... O. O h T O O o O O W) N o � O o O U) q q p 8 - O N `' N � m Q n cl Q a `a � rn a . � CD ro E ' 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;' 0:' o 0 0 Cl o p d n U O O O O a O- O O O C6. O LO O o O O O p -• Ifj N o ' 4j ti - rn .p z �O O 4 a N ' CC to p. O O p - D ZO Z o tD 'N C; tOJ N tt T m 'N M N w M - moo' N o ' zQ ti Q N W.M ID C j. z L w m m o d m m m E _ 0. m c o a a c o .� w m . Q C y m m (D J a 3 3 m U) n is m u► is m ao to m .. u� M E CD �► ao : �L O "- Z m to V a' E w a Wm v F- M 3 -p faC 3 H O E. '.� LL r.. J e O J eC Oui 'r w p ... �' M m fq .• C - L m O m t9 w - o C m 16 m::_ 15 a �• w a E _ o IDW = o m a > a XX - A 3 a O `O O. m c C O 0 m�. ID0.- E a 0" W. ta. m.. m m j O c ,,. ,� c o O 0 o A a L a m H O N f C ` (D U C IA co fo lu z U w ' m w CD to w N w ya Z COar Q c a w a C a c to F m' Z_ o tvC . w o to c o ° x x w 40 Q:C0._ 'MU j y 3 0 tip_. tp "w j1 m Z m Y o a `m a '� R tod A �: o a s E H. F ccv m p _ m m o to c i0 E 0� 3 a► 3 c o o p w t] p p m m fl to w 4 g 0 3 0 too a o o a v1; in o t3 tA.. �. o m o REVISION TO AGENDA ITEM 8 RESOLUTION NO. 07-011 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGARDING THE 2009 MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS ANDROADS MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") has established maintenance of effort guidelines: for the 1989 Measure A (Ordinance 88-1) Local Streets and Roads program; and WHEREAS, the 2009 Measure A (Ordinance No. 02-001) was adopted by the Commission in 2002 and approved by Riverside County voters on November 5, 2002 for the collection of the %Z percent sales tax to fund, transportation improvements commencing on July 1, 2009 through June 30, 20399; WHEREAS, the 2009 Measure A includes a Local Streets and! Roads Program in each of the three geographic area of the county of Riverside; and' WHEREAS, the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program includes a maintenance of effort requirement. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County j Transportation Commission, that the Riverside County Transportation Commission has adopted the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Maintenance of Effort Guidelines set forth in Exhibit A to this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12" day of September, 2007'. Terry Henderson, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH:.Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Maintenance of Effort Guidelines .STAFF RECOMMENDA T/ON: This item is for the Committee to: 1 Approve the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads :Program Maintenance of Effort ('MOE) Guidelines; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 07-011, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the 2009, Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Maintenance of Effort -Guidelines;" and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND /NFORMA T/ON: MOE guidelines have been in place for the Local Streets and Roads program since the commencement of the 1989 Measure A. The county of Riverside and the local cities must comply with these guidelines in order to .receive Measure A Local j Streets and Roads funds. As the commencement of the 2009 Measure A approaches, staff has reviewed the current MOE guidelines for application to the 2009 Measure . A Local Streets and Roads program. Based on this review and consultation with legal counsel, staff revised the guidelines developed for the 1989 Measure A, revised the dates and references, and inserted some clarifying language. Staff Ialso presented a draft to the. Technical Advisory Committee on June 18, 2007, and subsequently received comments from two cities that have been considered in the., revisions In addition to updating dates and references to the applicable ordinance, 'language has been added to . establish "base year" :MOE amounts for cities incorporated after July 1, 2007, and to reevaluate the MOE in 2019 (10 years 'later) and in 2029 (20 years later). further, the revised guidelines :include language relative to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee and Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan requirements in Western Riverside County.: The new guidelines will also establish a Agenda Item 8 24 RESOLUTION NO. 07-011 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGARDING THE 2009 MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") has established maintenance of effort guidelines for the 1989 Measure A (Ordinance 88-1) Local Streets and Roads program; and WHEREAS, the 2009 Measure A (Ordinance No. 02-001) was adopted by the Commission in 2002 and approved by Riverside County voters on November '5., 2002 for the collection of the '/2 percent sales tax to fund transportation improvements commencing on July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009; WHEREAS, the 2009 Measure A includes a Local Streets and Roads Program in- each of the three geographic area of the county of Riverside; and WHEREAS, the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program includes a maintenance -of effort, requirement. _, THEREFORE 'BE IT'RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation . Commission, that the Riverside County Transportation Commission has adopted the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Maintenance of Effort Guidelines set forth in Exhibit A to this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12t' day of September, 2007. Terry Henderson, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 200.9 MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES i INTENT Ordinance No. 02-001, adopted by the Riverside County Transportation Commission in 2002, approved a county -wide transportation expenditure .plan and called for the placement of Measure A on the November ballot to secure voter approval of. a 1 /2 percent sales tax to fund transportation improvements. On November 5,.2002, Riverside County voters approved Measure A and collection of the sales tax will commence on July 1, 2009. Ordinance.No. 02-001, in accordance with state law, imposes specific requirements on local agencies wishing to receive Measure A funds. In particular, in order to ensure continued local effort to maintain local streets and roads, the Ordinance requires that 'local agencies continue to expend the same amount for; construction and maintenance of local roads which they have expended in the past. The guidelines set forth below establish specific maintenance of effort requirements and are intended to satisfy the Comm' ission's_: responsibility to ensure that local transportation expenditures are maintained. GUIDELINES I. In'order to qualify for Measure A funds, each local agency entitled to funding under Ordinance No. 02-001 must demonstrate a continuing commitment of local discretionary funds to local street and road improvements and maintenance. The following actions are:required annually to. show a.continued maintenance of local.effort: A. .Each local agency must submit to the Riverside County Transportation. Commission ("Commission") a list of proposed uses for Measure A funds for the next five fiscal years (5-Year Plan). B. Each local agency must provide a certification to the Commission :that Measure A funds will not replace existing..local discretionary funds being used for local .27 i transportation purposes. Examples of local non -discretionary funds include; but are. not limited to, gas tax revenues, federal funding, and local transportationfunds (LTF). This certification shall be based on one of the following findings: 1. That the same level of discretionary funds was expended for local streets and roads purposes during the past fiscal year as was reported ,in the State Controller's Annual Report -of Financial Transactions for Streets and `'Roads for fiscal year 2007l08 -(herein referred to as the "base year"); or 2. That extraordinary expenditures made by the local agency during fiscal year 2007/08 make use of the State Controller's Annual Report for that.year unrealistic. in this case, the 'local agency may, upon approval -of the Commission, determine its local maintenance of effort requirement using one of the following methods: a. Averaging the amount of local discretionary funds reported to the State Controller for the three year period of fiscal years 2005/06 through 200710& or b. Subtracting extraordinary expenditures (including but not 4iimited to assessment district funds, redevelopment agency contributions, or other non recurring contribufions)- from its totaf - expenditures --during °' the': �2007/08'' fiscal year -: Development. impact fees paid by developers constructing new housing to offset the impact of development on local streets and roads may be subtracted `only if the local agency does not use, such funds to satisfy its maintenance of effort requirement, or C. Petitioning ,the Commission for special consideration. The ; Commission recognizes that there may be cases where the two methods described.above will not produce a dollar amount which adequately reflects the agency's past commitment Of local revenues toy the construction .and maintenance of 'local- streets and roads. In such cases.'the' Commission may establish a new minimum level of local streets and roads . expenditures for the local agency based on factors which the Commission determines are relevant. The . Commission may also allow, in its sole discretion, a . local - agency to use developer fees,#o satisfy its maintenance of effort requirement. A<local agency petitioning the Commission under ;this provision has the responsibility of presenting evidence which 7 shows the need 'for special consideration and which supports the, 'new. minimum expenditure limit. C. `For cities incorporated after July 1, 2007, the base year - shall be. the 28 average of the first three fiscal years of operations. The maintenance of local effort requirement shall apply to all fiscal years subsequent to the base year. D. The maintenance of local effort shall be reevaluated and revised in 2019 and 2029 using the guidelines in Section 1.13 above with the following substitutions: a. In 2019, the fiscal year.reference shall be 2017/18 and the three- year period of fiscal years shall be 20.15/16 through 2017/18. The revised base year will be effective in fiscal year 2019/20; and b. In 2029, the fiscal year reference shall be 2027/28 and the three- i year period of fiscal years shalt be 2025/26 through 2027/28. The revised base year will be effective in fiscal year 2029/30. It. The Commission may, in its sole discretion, order an independent audit of a local -agency Is local streets and roads expenditures to verify that the maintenance of effort - requirement has been met. 1 t.. When a local agency does not meet its maintenance of effort requirement in the fiscal year, the allocation to that agency in the following fiscal year will be reduced. The amount of. the reduction -will be. an ,amount equal to -the _amount which- -the agency's' expenditures were below the maintenance of effort requirement. Revenues withheld from a local agency for failure to meet the maintenance of effort requirement will remain in the Measure A area in which the agency is located, and will be allocated to the local agencies in the area, that are in compliance with the maintenance of effort requirement, using the allocation formula specified for the area. IV. Ordinance 02-001 also requires that local agencies, in the Western County and Coachella Valley areas must, in addition to meeting the maintenance of effort requirement, implement the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) developed by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) or the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), respectively, in order to be eligible to receive Measure A Local Streets and Road Program funds. In addition, local agencies in the Western County must participate in the Multi Species Habitat Conservation :Plan (MSHCP) by endorsing the permit and executing the Implementation Agreement in order. to be eligible to receive :Measure A Local Streets and Road Program funds. -Funds withheld from a focal agency -in these areas for failure to implement the TUMF or the MSHCP will be 29 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned. hereby agrees and certifies for (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Measure A) shall be used -in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines, and that the' Agency i shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds- previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of .the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: , 20 City Manager Attest: City Clerk • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION f 2009.MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS f MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES INTENT Ordinance No. 2-001, ado ted b the Riverside Count Transportation. Deleted: ss-� .� _..� �.- ....... -.P _ _ Y .... .. --. .._ ...... t ... Deleted:1988 , Commission in ZQO2, approved a noun wide transportation ex enditure plan and ... PP _ tY-....... P - . - P called for the placement of Measure A on the November ballot to secure voter approval of a 1 /2 percent sales tax to fund transportation improvements. On - - Deleted; 8,-1986 November 2002, Riverside P!?Ltnty voters aPP roved Measure A and collection of - Deleted: has since commenced the sales tax &ill commence on. July 1 2009. _ - -- ... Deleted: 88-1 Ordinance No.A2-001, in accordance with state law, imposes specific„ . .. i requirements on local agencies wishing to receive -Measure A funds. In particular, in order to ensure continued local effort to maintain local streets and roads, the Ordinance requires that local agencies continue to expend the same amount for construction and maintenance of local roads which they have expended in the past. The guidelines set forth below establish specific maintenance of effort requirements and are .intended -to, satisfy the Commission's. responsibility to ensure that .local i transportation expenditures are maintained. i GUIDELINES 1. In order to qualify for Measure A funds, each local agency entitled to funding under Ordinance No. 2-001 _must demonstrate a continuing commitment - Deleted: 88-1 --- of local discretionary funds . to :. local street _ and road improvements and Deleted` s maintenance. The following actions are required annually to show a continued, maintenance of local effort: A.. Each local agency must submit to the Riverside . County Transportation Commission ("Commission") a list -of proposed uses for Measure A funds. for the next five fiscal years (5-Year .Plan). B. Each local agency -must provide a certification to the Commission that Measure A funds will not replace existing local discretionary funds being used for local transportation purposes. Examples of local non -discretionary funds include, but are not limited to, gas tax revenues, federal funding, and local transportation funds (LTF). This certification shall be based on one of the following findings: 1. That the same level of discretionary funds &gs expended ' Deleted: were - " ,for local streets and roads purposes during the past fiscal year as was reported in the State Controller's Annual Report of Financial Transactions for Streets and Road s.for fiscal year 007/08 'herein referred to as the "base ear" ;_ or. .; ' Deleted: 1987-88 2. That extraordinary expenditures made by the local agency durin fiscal ear 007/08 make use of the State Controller`s Annual Re rt for that E 9 Y make ......... . .... _. .... ....... Po . Deleted:.1987-88 " ,I ;year unrealistic. In this case, -the local agency may, upon approval of the Commission, determine its local maintenance of effort requirement using one of the following methods: a. Averaging the amount of local discretionary 'funds reported to the State Controller for the three year period of fiscal years 005/06 Deleted` 1s85-8s hrough 007J08; or : Deleted: 1987-88 = . b. Subtracting extraordinary expenditures ' (incfuding`.z ;but not limited to,assessment district funds, redevelopment agency contributions,. or: , Deleted: SB'300 funds, ,other non -recurring contributions) from its total expenditures during the OZ 07/08 ;. "• Deleted:1987-88 ;fiscal year. Development impact fees ,paid by developers constructing new housing to offset the impact of development on local streets and roads may be subtracted only if the local agency does not use such funds to satisfy its maintenance of effort ,requirement, or C. :Petitioning the Commission for special consideration. The Commission recognizes. that there may be cases where the two ,methods described above will not produce a dollar amount which adequately `reflects the agency's past commitment of local revenues to the construction ' and ;maintenance of local streets and roads. In such cases, the Commission may establish ;a new minimum level of local streets and roads expenditures for the local 33 " agency based on factors which the Commission determines are relevant. The Commission may also allow, in. its sole discretion, a local agency to use developer fees to satisfy its maintenance of effort requirement. A local -agency petitioning the Commission under this provision has the responsibility of presenting evidence which shows the need. for special consideration and which supports the new minimum expenditure limit. C. For cities incorporated after July 1 2007, the base year shall be the average of the first three fiscal years of operations The maintenance of local effort requirement shall apply to all fiscal years subsequent to the base year. D. The maintenance of local effort shall be reevaluated and revised in 2019 and 2029 using the guidelines in Section 1.13 above with the following substitutions: a. In 2019, the fiscal year reference shall be 2017/18 and the three-year period of fiscal years shall be 2015/16 through 2017/18 The revised base year will. be effective in fiscal year  2019/20: and b. In 2029, the fiscal year reference shall be 2027/28 and the three-year period of fiscal years shall be 2025/26 through 2027/28 The revised base year will be effective in fiscal year 2029/30. _ II The Commission may, in, its sole discretion,,.order an .independent audit _ - of a local agency's local streets and roads expenditures to verify that the maintenance of effort requirement has been - Deleted: s met. ; I l I . When a local agency does not meet. its maintenance of effort*--- - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering requirement in the fiscal year, the allocation to that agency in the following fiscal year will be reduced. The amount of the reduction will be an amount equal to the amount which the agency's expenditures were below the maintenance of effort requirement. Revenues withheld from a local agency for failure to meet the maintenance of effort requirement will remain in the Measure A area in which the agency is located, and will be allocated to the local agencies in the area, that are in compliance with the maintenance of effort requirement, using the allocation formula specified for the area. IV. Ordinance 2-001 also requires that local agencies, in the Western. Deleted: $8-1 County and Coachella Valley areas must, in addition to meeting the maintenance of I. f effort requirement, implement the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) developed by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) or the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), respectively, in order to be eligible to receive Measure A Local Streets and Road Program funds. In addition; local agencies in the Western County must participate in the Mufti Species Habitat Conservation Plan. (MSHCP) by endorsing the permit and executing the Implementation Agreement in order to be eligible to receive Measure A :Local Streets and Road Program funds. Funds withheld from a local agency in these :areas Jor failure to implement the TUMF or the MSHCP will be disbursedDeleted: to the ; . .` Coachella Valley Area " Commission or CVAG, :as applicable,: and must be used by the Commission or CVAG for the regional arterial program. Local Streets and Road Program formula funds disbursed to the Commission or CVAG will be credited as local match funds f for the Measure A Regional Arterial Program formula funds. V. For the purpose of determining the amount of local discretionary funds expended by a local agency for local street and road purposes during a fiscal year, the agency may use any local discretionary funds expended for local street and road purposes during the preceding year which were in excess of the agency's -' Deleted: , maintenance ofeffort requirement as determined by the Commission. APPROVED BY RCTC: September , 2007 - 35 CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned hereby agrees and certifies for (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance ! No. 2-001- of the Riverside County 'Transportation Commission Measure A shall ! Deleted: xx 4 ) be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionarylocal funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency. { hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. i Dated: 20 41 " 'Y TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION )07 iplementation Committee a, Program Manager Deputy Executive Director 0/Interstate 215 East Junction Connectors Additional wcc i : Funds Request STAFF RECOMMENDATION. - This item is for the Committee to: 1.) Approve $4 million of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) ;program funds for the 60/215 East Junction connectors project for the. right-of-way phase; 2) . Approve $459,000 of Measure A funds- as match to the $4 million CMAQ funds in the event it is needed; 3) ' Approve a budget amendment for a $4 million increase to federal revenues=in-FY 2007/08.1 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to sign associated amendment agreements to reflect additional funding; and '5) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND WFORMA TION. The 60/215 East Junction connectors project is currently in the. design phase. This project is the seventh segment of the overall design sequencing project, 60/91 /215 interchange and corridor improvements project, currently under construction and scheduled for completion in April 2008. As the design sequencing project is nearing completion, project elements have been shifted to- be constructed as part of the 60/215 fast Junction connectors -seventh segment project to avoid repeated closures, reducing impacts to the community. The project elements shifted include realignment of the frontage road and widening along Box Springs Road -between Ironwood Road and Fair Isle/Box Springs Road interchange. This additional project . element will require the purchase of right-of-way in_ the amount of $4 million. The original 60/215 East Junction project did not require the purchase of right-of-way since''it was originally identified under the design sequencing project. However, costs have. increased since the original Agenda Item 9 37 4 estimate bringing the right-of-way cost total to $4 million. Staff recommends programming $4 million of CMAQ funds for the -right-of-way phase. There . are , enough CMAQ funds available this fiscal year to cover this request. CMAQ funds are restricted to certain project types and this project is eligible for these funds. Further, there are State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds programmed for the construction phase. Staff will request that these funds be considered -as match for the $4 million in CMAQ funds. If this request is denied, staff recommends the approval of $459,000 of 'Measure A .funds be used as match. The total project cost- ,including the $4 million for right-of-way is $38 million. Other funding committed. on this -project includes $2.2 million of CMAQ for: the design phase. with $287,000 of Measure A as match funds, and $31.6 million of STIP funding for the construction phase. Environmental and preliminary engineering was previously completed :under the design sequencing project. Financial Information No -$4,000,000 In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: V4591004 CMAQ Yes Source of Funds:. Measure''A _ Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.;: N/A Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 08/20/2007 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA T/ON COMM/SS/ON DATE: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Additional Funds Request For State Route... 60/Valley Way to Interstate 15 Project STAFF RECOMMENDA T/ON: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve an additional $1.5 million of Congestion Mitigation and Air -Quality (CMAQ) program funds for the SR-60/Valley Way. to -I-15 high occupancy vehicle (HOV) and mixed flow (MF) gap closure project; 2). Authorize. the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review., to sign associated amendment agreements to. reflect additional funding:; - and - i 3) Forwar& to the Commission �for`final action. i -BACKGROUND /NFORMA T/ON.• The SR-60/Valle Way to 1-15 HOV and Y Y gap closure project has been under construction since May 2006. During construction, the: 'project encountered problems such as unsuitable material (large rocks and boulders), different site conditions during trenching of electrical conduits -and drilling for. most sound walls, and other changes related to field conditions for roadway work, utilities, and bridge structure work. The project needs an additional $1.5 million to cover increased costs associated ;with the above work. The Commission previously approved a total of $'26 _million of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) .funds, of which, $21 million was a loan to the state to replace suspended Traffic Congestion Relief (TCR) funds during the state budget crisis. In addition, $8.881 million of Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program funds were loaned by the Commission in December '2004 to allow the project to proceed due to 'lack of available State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funding during the state budget crisis. Agenda 'Item 10 39 A Letter of No Prejudice was approved by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in March 2005 allowing repayment of $21 million dollars of `TCR funds, which will be. repaid "upon completion of the SR-60 project currently scheduled for January: 2009.. Further, the $8.881 million TUMF loan was repaid during the 2006 STIP cycle .and :was. programmed on the 60/215 East Junction project. -Staff recommends programming the additional $1.5 million needed to complete the SR-60 project with CMAQ funds. There are enough CMAQ funds available this fiscal year to cover this request. Should the Commission approve staff's recommendation, the Commission's funding participation for this project after receipt_ ofthe- TCR repayment will be $6.5 million of CMAQ funds: The `total Project cost including the additional $1.5 million is $65.445 million. Financial Information In Fiscal Year ._Budget: N/A Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: $1, 500,000 Source of funds: Federal CMAQ Budget Adjustment: MA GLA No. N/A Fiscal Procedures Approved: � �� Date: 08/22/2007 " r RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION- DATE.: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2008-12 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement' Plans for Local Streets and Roads for the Cities of Calimesa,: Murrieta, and Norco STAFF RECOMMENDATION: i This item is. for the .Committee to: 1) Approve the FY 2008-12 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) for local. streets and roads for the cities of Calimesa, Murrieta, and Norco as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BA CKGROUND- /NFORMA TION. j Measure A requires each recipient of local streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended in . order to receive its Measure' A disbursements. In addition, the Coachella Valley and Western County cities and the county must. be participating in either the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) or Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are required to submit the annual certification of maintenance of effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. On April 20, 2007, Commission staff provided the local agencies with 'Measure A revenue projections for local. streets and roads to assist them in preparation of the required CIP. The agencies were asked to submit their CIPs by June 11, 2007 for submission to the Budget and Implementation Committee at its June 25, 2007 meeting and to the Commission on July 11, 2007. At its July 11, . 2007 meeting, the Commission approved the plans for all but six cities: Beaumont, 'Desert Hot Springs, Calimesa, 'Lake Elsinore, Murrieta and Norco. Subsequently, staff has received the required CIP, MOE certification and supporting documentation from the cities of Calimesa, Murrieta, and Norco. The other three cities have been informed that no disbursement of 'Measure A Agenda item 11 41 81353 J R o Igoeo D f.calilflesa CP �► AUG 13 2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION August 9, 2007 Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTN: Jerry Rivera 3560'CJniversity Avenue #100 Riverside, CA 92501 RE:. FY2008- t 2 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan Dear Mr. Rivera: I am submitting the 2008-2012 Measure A expenditureplan as required on behalf of our City Engineer; Anne Schneider. As a reminder (per our 'prior Cif En ' eer ,the Ci ' of ip p Y � ) , ty Calimesa was not incorporated prior to the voter approval and is therefore, not subject to the Measure A Maintenance of Effort Certification. If you have any questions please call me at 909-795-9801 x 230. Sincerely, Debbie Cain Finance Director Cc: Anne Schneider, City Engineer Dave Lane, City Manager I u, kL F _ 4) k k y o O a F- ccil n s o 0 �o 0 k o LL au cr o , E � W cc Ll W !.cc °. > L. :v .4) a� o f� a, (D O _*_ Q E S OD (>'' ® ('` V � Q CV a' .fl V z - OI Z t[f m W ' C O m t Ca Z' E' " -_ LL tF - 1 ca W ��J�� o0 0 td3 00 rn r. 0 o cc T tV CV zo - o aQto Z U !Mn a O 00 H {n 619 cts J o - ZUN J m i 'ui U7 t W m ca Fn 0 0 w _ CU m m p a> U - co m �� o c `- U _ CD EUrn m? C) > p,co nC> N cCD E ��- -0 3 cm Cl) C) m Zco�� o Z w 0.m E I NOD ui C - 4 T V LL a. o0 0 KV OD O r to co �a o o� U C? tt I F o m Ou,`: J o CA d ao AL �. _ U m: W co IL O CC o �. i- ++ Co . 0 +- (Duj 5 O .O' ' W cis � ono v o Co O U Ep < _ .6+ OL � L- j� � ® coLO tIS VJ . D cd C 'E' . Q o -o o cd _ Z U q) Z com Z' W fl- C 4D t at m f Q d [L D = " i i i { i f IDC ' V U 0 . Z [i 0 0. Z i V LL T 1611C zaN 0 >- W D LL U m N D a�� C�� to �� t- as �� o U co (Drn do QC co U CD Z m w _ C�� a Qaao 0 0 0 N W T i��i j i i .a ia. Z. E i F ^w� Q..� Z ` .� . aQ: U �z Z V N Z .W U cc o 7.r) U cn U 0 W AD c 'p c cr. n. C 7 U m m 0 m OD C N U c p CV CD,d AD Co }-vZ¢ U o Z m UJ C z; cm ¢aa-:0 -- ��t O N N Ln 00 0 0 0 IC,000rLo `O r C3}. Q r- O 1- O 00 C7 O 00 H O O r O m W O CC L(3 j��.tiLfNr}NLO C 1 N e- I I 69 69'Efl'69 69 69 69..69 69 . `d' CD N N LO CD. 0 1- CD CO 00 O e-- UG -a OOr- t-OCML[)OO C�� an m to �� Ln 1` V 1` Cd. N CV O N N I ! 60 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 �� 4 o c c c c c c c ���%o o o o o o-o" o F- c ._. �%. ,., ,.. z t! c 3 3 3 3 3 3..3 o ��O '.5.- '�� " �� c c C C c CO) C Z a��UUUU o.o .o 000 0 0to - O Oj N. ' co-U U. 0 w '`'' `. O c c U o QCL> �-c: co Uj 4 W � ����}�� o 2 m 3 o. o U �� ymoa��� " Cl) Cc Cc ��' ' c H (U C A., L_to C Q o _ " t ... 0O Cd v v m v o.Y ca Q(n ��mLOQ0=a.��o vi m =(0 �� 0) c Co Q " �) c a oCO 0 _j2:��(I"zU C7 00 CO n 00 r- O N ; * �tn��r.N v..d NCpcocoCM��MM UONMMM'��td'd' 0 A 0 .. � 0LO.r 0p 00 O 00 00 00 00 00 oCL(LCLaaa.a a- o j i m C c'> cc Cit 0 O v.. aaaao - ��rNV)Ict Colco r`C)oOO 00 000OOO O0 ti co Q OOOOo Oto - p� yOOOtf)O LO H Cc~MMOO tiM �-- r N N b9 ER' d4' b9 tf3 dg 69- 6t} !` 0 O O e- 0 00 O :O U") lf) O to w C7 0 O Co Co cO y0 0000?P' rC i— C) to CD V MCMMOti hit N O a 6Gq61.> 611> 60). aa�cccca O� vcD0== CU a)LCO`co2 o�c - V cc sc o a 0o00 o CD a N Q O co mU (a N , p�.. Q)a �Y 06 ►1 U. U c _ .r Y 1. Y zw Cr. Q�� o� o Q�C�, ,AU-, -L .` C: Uca W cv Lo. pW Co Co .��oc(Lo� o cr fY o LLj CL 0O 0 p ;tm-- N r-. a . ` E�,o.m cov,cc ca CO � o� C O 'i M>g) � C6 C� Q1 � .{V N 2 3 co m m a Z ! 0 co (9 M a,2' m M .� 4? M CO v-- � � N Y.r vt M m In CD CD '` N u 0 'Rt (D ch to M � O � .-. �, 'o o�� 4) co GO y ,.. Co c0 ,,., CO oan. ca C Ca C � m � �rNM gtto Coti " 000, C) c oo oO co o %( NOO 0O N --" L ViGDOL00 a COCe)C) !��0 N Gf3 K} d4" (f} Cf3 69 OOO Ott 000 O LO 01`00 V co 0 tr) r .- co m M ti { Z o .693.619��64 64)1693 cu V a 'c o aa)i a o DU OBUD " yLo E N U N V ca @_e o ` O ;a�� ��0) 0 o �� �� Q E j �� 0 o 4- O�� E/) a) m ca Qt- CN a�� Cj W 0 c �� I 4h, .0 LL O o a) - v+ ��. Q 0 't3 0 m0 0oaD C))M 0Ne- C Ir- Q ICE(1IC ) o o m co 4.4 OM O .E a! _�� i 0 to LZto a) a) 5 C .a) co (L Z 0 �� O Z m O N m _ 0 0 U-) wd M N d)'`N t1 O �� Co (n co mCDOD.,,,��, 3O co '0 Qom,:� v:Mm oo�� ��40��; �� aci kea4 `��NM ter.. 0 0 O C) N O O Cl y � � co 5 C co M I,*- rn 6R3 69 -(a (a Efi O O O O O O N O O 00 V CD M ti w F� 6f} 693 fIi a co •a) V (1) a CO U) �p co ago 0 O � � :L C7T t1CZ�_ m a�N o a� c c p ' y,U V N c2 CV Q a) a) o ° �L `. o� Y ¢UA cstm Lf> 0 av,o � dw�NCD C c a a \ E v M .L o m '� O E C�4 m m 2 L.. CO 0 O pw2�C`V QOODf/�Vi �,`•-NCO w 0 0� r p��ca 0 UvmZo-)i QU0cl ,Q m C m C '• E Qaa4o Al"N c " O O o co a O O Ln ao Lf) Q N O O 1- O - L ����Lp ���� CD tom. coO y C 00 tp 3 N d K3 to b9 69 Ed} O O o co o O v Ln +��+NO Of1- 0 O M r 00 LQ r V co [h h co w N Q 63 E93 Ef3 69 m Q. V V U CO cu o�� C0= oC: ado o OQ co CD co Q N o �� QUN SUN LL. > .a O U-) W L sL ul r1 o coo LO o CO o c w Q vi ��N+�=THY Lt:t ��O O R3 W a. CDM rn( N r O " �� .G a�� Eoo��,�� in d> e 1 O C C O CO N N .() O Z '�� O O o�� ���� ��oWco ` C) ;4 CD ��' F, . 3 CO to CL tm a��oflU�� a ��m c �� c N a? Q :0 w aaaa4 .-N i LJ " d -o ��o %-# In O 0 in n o I M r) IN ri N N M p3 up la �� C 3 W Uo jp p. 0 Ln N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N In 00 N M M. L��JI Q o c to m a 0 c UL A W M o LO _ v y �� 1�% er �� �� o V L" , W o r c m Q, Y��3 M E ' o o a A a cc o m v H� uoC +., o. a u c 2 b ? a �� 06 ''' w o' �� IE06 H C yCk H _ ��L43 f IX " N Q O ��p N. 0! {y L N ;A u'1 1y M C LLw p to O N N N !ALA In M1 h aQ. �� O 0 0 ��c n. ��.` ��-- ��. C o 3 o Ch at. fl.. ��4i 4 �� v to t R 1! M I E o ^ �; �� �� z t- II a ��' a Q E me O '����� c�� '�� N o F b Z O N 41 fi �� Wat 7- A O a QI 'i Lr .a 4 0. a a. 0s Z t+i eh D ri 10 Im .i , rl V4 i s �� " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Jerry Rivera, -Program Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2007-11 Measure A Five-Ye.ar Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Calimesa STAFF RECOMMENDA TION. This item is for the Committee to: 11) Approve the FY 2007-1 1 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement, Plan (CIP) for local streets and roads for the city of Calimesa as submitted; and 2)Forward to the Commission for final action. BA CKGROUND INFORMA TION: Measure A requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive its Measure A disbursements. In addition, the Coachella Valley and Western County the cities and the county must be participating in either the Coachella Valley Association.of Governments (CVAG) or Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). program.. The agencies are required- to submit the, annual certification of maintenance of effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. On April 10, 2006, Commission staff provided the 'local agencies with Measure A revenue projections for local streets and roads to assist them in preparation of the required CIP for FY 200.7711. The agencies were asked to submit their CIPs by June 12, 2006, for submission to the Commission on July 12, 2006. The required CtP, 'MOE certification and supporting documentation was recently. received from the city of Calimesa. " l I I 1 I I I vi ��Q 0 oc U�� O 0 CL < p cc =LL o CL Cl) o a Z LL d Z w .fY L w Q ow m U C W co . c LL C 0 N 0 L Qi ca :Q �� C-O RI Lb U ��Fo 0 Ca Cl < C) m co U >. N 6 U mZ Z .�� m W ZL C3 a t v �aan 0 N , O N -. k _ o - c�� Z , o _ oaf Oa_. Q p 1- ;.-�- au. J Z N .V ao�. - J tL H tea:. w. ac _ ---- Ucn a. W 0 W cri Q) C cc N V Q) 0 i Q1 �j zJ Co QD C> cO 0) .co co C) cm W Q ai d CL 0 " j U d ca p o 0 r 0 _ o N N 0 i oa - a��~ - _. _CN - ..J d O ?' 0a cr d CO o. 1-0 V N .(D �� co 1// Yr W W a OirQ a m w c or 1L- LL p C o ca .0��'~oo Q ��. a+Q.�� N cu p U FO [U ?. N 1. a Q H O  3 " U m z �� O N - w o E - Qfia-0 N T LL 1 s_. N t� ' CCm G c Z � • Q Q Cd 0 -U. Ch J � c� ZC�.iN Q co a z W a ?. C C V C C �L =L V) tb c C j a O a 0 cc Z o co r CO — u a a u. AMh y- c 'o p u C) Q C3 U M co >, cm o a fl .. --0 0 z U � m W o Z m of " c o�� Q 0 . U U A' W V 7-3��. UJ 0 W m & i O l giro E oc tU (D 70 t m R} �� _ O ca Qf rCL C CD 'L. N m E v a) cu U) U mcd `s m o �� 2 U of a'. >Q 6 } "a CV C'7 U a)Z O Z w Q m CO m Q a a to - � ii I�. .. - ''�' �� � � � � - ; -�� .. '� � _ - " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE:. �� August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Fiscal Year 2007-11. Measure A Capital. Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Corona STAFF RECOMMENDAT/ON: This :item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the amendment to the FY 2007-11 Measure A -Capital - Improvement 'Plan for local streets and roads for the city of Corona as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BA CKGROVND /NFORMA TION: Measure A requires each recipient of local streets and roads monies to annually provide to. the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds :are to be expended in order to receive its Measure A disbursements. In addition, the Coachella Valley and Western County cities. and the county must be participating in ;either the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG)' or Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are also required to submit an annual certification of maintenance of effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. The CIP for the city of Corona was approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2006 meeting. Any revisions to the adopted plan must be returned to the Commission for approval. The city of Corona is Irequesting to amend its FY 2007-11 CIP to reflect adjustments to the city's capital projects that have been approved by the city council throughout the fiscal year. Attachment: Letter from the City of Corona with revised CIP.-schedule (951) 736-2447 (951) 279-3627 (FAXI AtiE@ci.corona.cams (E-mail) June 7, 2007 80632 J R Q �)07 OFFICE OF: PUBLIC WORKS DEP M&*1 1 2007 D.itiCD(►!nr nn,a,r.. —TTMEM"Ur. tovuly I I 400 SOUTH VICENTIA AVENUE, P.O. BOX ,T Oi,CDAWMIA 92878-0940 CORONA CITY HALL - ONLINE, ALL'THE TIME (http:llwww.discovercorona.com) Eric Haley, Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue #100 Riverside., CA 92501 Attention: Jerry `Rivera. SUBJECT: CITY OF CORONA 2006/07 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL- IMPROVEMENT PLAN BUDGET We -.hereby request `a rev.ision to the FY 2QOfi/07 Five Year Capital_ Improvement Plan Budget. The adjustment to capital :projects will be reported in Project- Status Report as continuing I appropriations into the 2007/08 Fiscal Year. ; The Corona City Council has approved the attached Measure A Capital Improvement Project funding using available fund balance. All current year budgetary realignments have also been identified on the same attachment. If you have any questions :please contact Reza Zolghadr, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer, at 951- . 736-2441, or Barbara Thierjung, finance Manager, at 951-736-2314. Sincerely - A I ESKANDARI, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director AE/RZJIrt attachment cc: Barbara Thierjung, Finance Manager Reza Zolghadr, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer 66 X.20.07 U O M N wro; c 4 Owl y O .tea. .42 RY` 4 q QC U('' C'l V 0- t1 A .b O O tp G 6. O � C) "� �J O vi �^ N O US O" oQ tii O aK C. C> -� O %O a)O rppm, 00 pQ _ O O N O O r' G - Q - -_ �L3 O O O 00 . o O o O n rI O n cr, r m ry -- N r:oc ` O v, O p -- i1 C 11-i Q N U z � � o 3 ' 3 3 GS bL N of E Cd cs C MOb b 50 c(+ N N J CJ ._ •� Q: -� r-� ►�. .N.. N-. ���.nn co co �.�I _� c E. moo/ W CD L.4 V . r- O O U U N K •C d d y o 4.) C U J C C 3 r C ,n v N O G V U O =3 7 .> }, y y 4) y Cs cr C. 0. CL L Gca '� Cd VJ V cm •E c ' W 0 G c c o43 =a¢cz 0HQ U c n m - c, � of �► U U �, v a, ` E U c: .. � r% U. U W 0 -- cv r•, v � :� n x �. o N O O N GL POD a �o 4 � p Cry N or.4cn- 'rr O O 4 rq N V c � a a .W a Its' a �y 3 ti Vj 'tom 0 C> i � W C QQ O X o- O Cv O S cV t vT ei; vl O t�. C C Q 00 O � o a 3 a AUL U. U c c c c c N 0.1 , , -t4 Ofi; �. 43 . Q C[1 �4 m zi a4 cC co 0. R G_ C 'y U. U Q G d O :3 _C •-Oi L y NC03 10 y M.Ci U N C ti y Q� •� .� L Qi �% Cd i•�i G O O a.+ O �. C Q G = c9 E N E E T O C E L+ O E O G 2cd= ob L W.w 3CO° w w o a c ° a� Vvs .. ° . °�' c c c ►,� tw. O C on C w Q ._. O 40. 4w ++ v_ ca O yN - co ma > o c U V C x b O K r•• x F„ N N G? ;. O N 00 cl fV t% C v; W N 69 69 69 N O K, N - O +p N v�4tOC3. ca �m o '0 G ~ Cd 0 4 E U �.o.o ^ct b p Q � O .F4 > b4 ., O G 0 R b � . cL o oo � C Li LL f3. OEE) " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. DATE: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee Edda Rosso, Program Manager FROM: .Richard 'Bryan, Bechtel Program Manager Stan Haas, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy .Executive. Director Agreement No. 08-33-01 1-00 for Construction Management Services to. Support the North Main Corona Parking Structure and SUBJECT: the Perris.- Multim,odal Facility and Authorization to Advertise for Construction. Bids for the North Main Corona Parking Structure and the Perris:Multirnodal Facility STAFF RECOMMENDA TION: This item is for the Committee`W: 1) Direct. staff to,. present its award recommendation and; :notice . to t = proceed to =the Commission for Agreement No. 08=33-01 1=0D' -for construction management services to support the construction of the North Main Corona parking structure in the city of Corona. and the - Perris Multirnodal Facility in the city of Perris; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute Agreement No. 08-33-01 1-00 on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize staff to advertise to receive bids for the construction of the North Main Corona parking structure in the city of Corona and the Perris 'Multimodal Facility in the city. of Perris, contingent on federal funding authorization; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMA TION: The Commission and Gordon H: Chong & Partners entered into an agreement to perform conceptual design and environmental services in connection with the construction of a new, multi -level parking structure containing 1,000 parking spaces at the North Main Corona Metrolink station. The- agreement was then amended to include -final design of the structure and preparation of contract plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E). The parking structure final design is complete and city approvals have been obtained; the. current estimated construction cost is $25 million. Staff is preparing the construction. documents to be ready to advertise Agenda Item 14 69 for construction once funding is authorized. Prior to advertisement of the project for construction; staff would like to establish an agreement with a qualified construction ­ management consultant to review the plans and administer the construction contract. in addition, the Perris 'Multimodal Facility is in final design, which includes eight bus bays, `shelters, platform, and a 141 space parking lot. This will be operated as a bus terminal by Riverside Transit Agency prior to service by the Perris Valley '-.Line. The projected -construction cost for this project is $5 million. 'This project will also require a- construction management consultant to review the ;plans and administer the construction contract. At its - July 111 2007 meeting, the Commission authorized and directed -.staff to issue a request for proposal (RFP) for construction management services to firms interested in, providing construction management services. :Calendar. of Events Issued RFP (Advertisement) July 27, 2007 Pre -proposal Conference August 9, 2007 Written Questions Deadline August 131 2007 Responses Posted Deadline August_.15, 200.7... RCT.0 Addendum Deadline August 15, 2007 Proposal Deadline August 17, 2007 Short Listed Firms Notified August 241 2007 .:Interview Date August 30, ,`2007 . Anticipated `Contract Award Date, September 12, 2007 Anticipated Project Start Date ('NT'P) October 10,: 2007 The calendar" of events was developed so that a ` construction management consultant can be' under contract prior to the advertisement of the construction projects. This'�will allow the consultant to perform a constructability review prior to advertisement -so as to identify, any potential construction related problems, alternative means, methods, or materials that could reduce the construction duration or costs. Selection 'Process Staff has assembled a selection panel, which consists of representatives from the Commission, cities. of Corona and Perris, and Bechtel. Once the proposals :are received ,on August. 17, 2007, they will be reviewed and ranked b' the panel. The short listed firms will be requested to participate, in an interview with. the panel.. At the completion of the interviews, the panel will -select the top ranked firm, which Agenda Item 14 70 " staff will present as.. its award recommendation to the - Commission - at its September 12, 2007 meeting. In addition, staff is requesting authorization from the Commission to advertise for construction bids for the- North Main Corona parking structure and the Perriss-Multimodal Facility , :pending separate funding authorizations from Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. Upon authorization of federal funds, the construction contracts will be advertised. After the bids are received, staff will review and bring 'back to the Commission a recommendation for award to the lowest responsive, responsible 'bidder. Financial Information In fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2007/2008 Amount: $1,500,000 Measure A Funds for Perris Multimodal Facility (P3816); Source of Funds: State Transit Assistance Funds for Budget Adjustment: No North Main Corona Parking Structure (P3808) GLA No.: 221 3381302 P3808 $1,000,000 1221 33.81302 P.3816 ._ �� _,500,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 08/22/2007 Agenda Item 14 " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Claudia Chase, Property Administrator Min Saysay, Right -of -Way Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Authorization to .Issue a Request for Statement. of Qualifications for On -calf Maintenance Contractor for the Metrolink Stations.: STAFF RECOMMENDA T/ON.- This item is for the Committee to: 1l Direct staff to develop and advertise a request for statement of qualifications (SOQ) for on -call maintenance contractor services for the- five Metrolink commuter rail stations; 2} . Form a selection committee comprised of Commission sand 'Metrolink staff to review, evaluate, and rank all. SOQs received; " 3} ' Authorize staff tonegotiate a contract with the top -ranked contractor and bring back a recommendation to the Commission for contract award; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action.. BACKGROUND INFORMA T/ON: The Commission is the owner and operator . of five Metrolink stations in Riverside County. These five stations were constructed and began operation '5 to 15 years ago. During this time, the stations general maintenance and repairs were performed through purchase orders. Scopes of work were prepared, advertised, and awarded to the lowest bidder who best met the required qualifications. This process has resulted- in an unacceptable amount of time passing between the identification of the problem and its eventual repair. Staff is currently working on selecting. contractors to improve the maintenance of. C6 mmission-owned operating facilities. This includes landscape maintenance, station cleaning, lighting maintenance, and general electrical. This on -call list will allow the Commission to contract and direct one of the service providers to perform the necessary work. This SOQ will complete the range of service contracts by addressing the need for an on -call maintenance contractor who can perform repairs and. maintenance to the stations structures, pedestrian overcrossings,_ and parking facilities. Services Agenda item 15 72 _ include, but are not limited to, repair and maintenance of canopies, concrete platform, asphalt- parking lots, plumbing, roofing, structural steel, hand rail/guard` rail, at -grade - pedestrian crossings, sliding/rolling gates, painting, drywall removal/replacement, non -slip flooring treatment, sign removal and installation; electrical work within railroad right-of-way, concrete curb and gutter; storm drain- inlet repairs, and other general repairs and maintenance that may arise. The contract will be for three years with two one-year options to. be exercised at the discretion of the Commission. The total contract budget is $300,000 and 100,000 is included in the FY 2007/08 budget. The funding for these station repairs will come from Local Transportation Funds and Measure A Funds. SCHEDULE The schedule for the selection process is proposed as follows: Distribution of SOQ September 13, 2007: Pre -proposal Conference (not mandatory) September 17, 2007 Written Questions September 19, 2007 Responses ::Posted September 2.1, 2007 Proposal Deadline (by 2:00 p.m.) September 28., 2007 Short 'listed. Firms 'Notified Oct'ober-10,'2007 - Interview Date October 17, 2007 StaffRecommendations to Commission November 14, 2001, Financial Information In'Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: $100,000 Source of Funds: LTF &.Measure. A Budget Adjustment: No , GLA No: 103.24 73315 P4001,, -P4002, P4003, P4004, P4005.and P4006 $50,000 1.221 33 90701 4199. $50,000 Fiscal- Pro1.cedures Approved:.¢ Date: 08/22/2007 _ " R/VERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTA T/ON COMMISSION DATE: August 27, 2007 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director FROM: Mark,'Massman, Bechtel Project Manager Robert Wunderlich, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH:: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT Interstate 215 Bi=County 'Improvement Project - Increase in Funding for Project Development Work STAFF RECOMMENDA T/ON: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Authorize an increase in funding from $2 million to $4 million for the development of a project report and environmental document (PRIED) for the 1-215 Bi-County improvement project; and 2) Forward t6 the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Expanding I-215 from SR-60 to San Bernardino County Line is a significant project identified in both the 1989 and 2009 Measure A programs.. In the 1989 Measure, this project was dependent on there being a matching project in San Bernardino County, which, until recently, was not programmed. In the 10-Year Western - County 'Highway Delivery Plan of the 2009 Measure, $55 million was identified for this project - primarily for 'PRIED. The San Bernardino AssociationofGovernments (SANBAG) has: identified funds for developing a project on 1-215 from the Riverside County Line to Orange Show Road. The combined project,. referred to as the 1-215 Bi-County improvement project, will include the addition of one mixed flow lane and one 'high occupancy vehicle lane in each direction. At its April 9, 2003 meeting, the 'Commission approved entering into Cooperative Agreement No. 03-31-068 with SANBAG for the development of a PR/ED for the -215 Bi-County improvement project. The cooperative agreement identified SANBAG as lead agency for the project, required the Commission to participate in funding at a prescribed 25 % of project cost rate, and provided for the. Commission to be lead on . scope issues in Riverside County. The cooperative agreement also required SANBAG to q provide contract management, be lead on scope issues in San Bernardino County, and support. 75'% of _the project costs. The cooperative Agenda Item 16 74 ,agreement with SANBAG is still in full force and effect. At its April 9, „2003 meeting,.the Commission also approved $2 million to fund the first three years of the Commission's portion of the 1-215 Bi-County improvement project costs,, which included up to $1 million for special studies associated with the ultimate facility study that the Federal Highway Administration has requested be performed on the 60/91 /215 interchange. As required by the cooperative agreement with SANBAG, all costs associated with the special studies on the 60/91 /215 interchange will be born entirely by the Commission. n early 2003, SANBAG issued a request for qualifications- to' select an environmental consultant and design consultant to begin the requisite studies to support the development of a PR/ED for the project. Commission staff.,partieipated on both selection panels and SANBAG awarded Contract No. C030046 to Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation (LAN) for engineering services; and Contract No. ' C030045to LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) for environmental services 'for the i-215 'Bi-County improvement project. SANBAG recently requested that LAN and LSA complete a reevaluation of the scope, cost, and schedule to complete the PR/ED. As a result of this reevaluation, SANBAG anticipates the cost of the development of a PR/ED for the.--1-215 Bi-County improvement project to be $1 1.5 million, with a scheduled completion in ,August 2012 , The Commission's 25% -share of the project cost is. $2.875 `million: Including a ' reasonable contingency and the cost of up to $1 million for :.special studies on the 60/91 /215 :interchange, the Commission's total. cost is anticipated to be $4 million. Staff recommends an increase_ in funding from. $2.. million to $4 ' million for. the development of .' a PR/ED for the 1-215 Bi-County improvement project. The previous action of the Commission identified the funding for the project as a loan of funds from the 1989 Measure to the 2009 Measure. - Staff recommends continuing to fund this project as a loan to preserve 1989 Measure program capital. Financial Information Jn Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 Amount: 500,000 $3,500,000 Source of Funds: Measure A Budget Adjustment: ' No GLA No.: 222 3'1 81101 -P3012 Fiscal:: Procedures Approved: Date: 08/22/2007 " E COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON ugust.27, 2007 fidget and Implementation Committee ihn Standiford, Public Affairs Director -ic Haley, Executive Director tate and Federal Status Report STA. FF RECOMMENDA TION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Adopt a SUPPORT position for the development of the Foothill -South Transportation Corridor (State Route 241) in Orange County; 2) Receive and file as an information item; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMA TION. State Budget.Update While comedians and political pundits have been able to milk a few laughs out of theLegislature's, inability to pass - a budget, many others, depending' on state funding or for those needing Legislative action on other matters, the multi -week i delay of the budget is hardly a laughing matter. The Legislature returned from its recess on August 20, and fully reached a budget agreement on August 21, 2007. While the Assembly did approve a budget in early July and then adjourned, the Senate has been unable to pull together the 2/3rds vote needed to approve a spending plan. Republicans, with one exception, have remained united in opposing the 'budget that was approved by the Assembly. Certainty, overall spending is a major cause of the opposition, but so too are a number of policy issues that are contained in a variety of trailer bills. Trailer bills are often amended right before a vote, which allows for little public notice and are urgency 'bills that become law immediately after 'being signed by the Governor. This year there has been an opportunity to notice some of these bills given the delay in passing .a: budget. Overall _there are more than 20 trailer bills that have also been approved in one Legislative house or another and a handful are connected to transportation. AB 8$ is one .such >bill -and its intent is to implement a number of provisions of Proposition 1 B. Among the provisions of interest are funding for.' local governments, policy direction on funding for railroad crossing, and the allocation of emissions reduction funding for goods movement. -For local. governments, the news is somewhat grim for larger cities. Proposition 1 B provides* a total of $1 billion to cities and an additional to $1 billion to counties for local road maintenance and construction. Local government interests had hoped that the ;entire $2 billion would be . allocated as quickly possible, however only $350 million. is allocated in this particular bill, thus deferring additional funding until a future year. This might reflect the state's worsening. economic situation and will need to be .:monitored in the future with the implementation of the whole infrastructure ,bond package. SB' 88 still allows small cities to receive the $400,000 minimum that - was guaranteed .to' every incorporated city. While that will be welcome news in very small -communities, larger cities will be required to receive a prorated share of the available funding. The-bill�°also directs Public' Utilities Commission and th`e California Transportation " Commission to develop rulemaking for the allocation of $250 million in grade separation .dollars. The criteria set forth in this. bill should benefit a number of projects locally given its emphasis on crossings that -serve a combination of passenger .rail: and freight rail. Another . topic .that . has caused friction regarding the budget is Attorney .Genera] Jerry Brown's lawsuit against San Bernardino County for itsnewly approved General :Plan .(The Plan). The Attorney General has sued to block, the implementation of . the 'Plan because it does not address the issue of greenhouse .,gas, emissions, pursuant to AB .32 from last year's legislative .sessio:ni. Regulations regarding this 'issue are not expected to be approved for. at.. least a few years, 'however the Attorney General was arguing that the newly -adopted Plan needed to address the issue. Senate Republicans sought a provision in a trailer bill that would prevent ..this . type of suit from being brought against ,projects and local governments '. Regardless of the outcome of the legislation and litigation, greenhouse gas issues must become a priority along with. other air quality. issues as agencies continue to move forward on transportation projects in the future. 77 Trade Corridor Infrastructure Fund Talks Continue One item of Proposition. 1 B that is not covered by SB .8.8 is the, $2 billion Goods Movement Infrastructure component that is often referred to as the- Trade Corridor. Infrastructure Fund (TCIF). During the past month Stephanie ,Wiggins, of Commission staff has led an effort to, bring together the transportation commissions from Jive southern California counties, the Alameda Corridor -East { Construction . Authority the. Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, and the Ports. of Long Beach and Los Angeles: to develop a consensus approach on 'TCIF` funding for all of Southern- California. The main goal of the effort is to maximize the amount of funding from this program for ;Southern California and would -fund projects throughout the entire system: including' railroad grade separations in Riverside County. As part of . these discussions, the ports have indicated that they are working towards the.. establishment- of a voluntary, tariff program to provide matching funding: Although this is far from certain, it reflects a growing understanding that those .involved in the chain of goods movement -related transportation will have to contribute to. -its expansion. A legislative briefing of Capitol staff is scheduled for Thursday, August 30, 2007, .in Sacramento The_ issue of .=goods..rnov_ement .remains a .to.p priority for_,Io cal , .-... .. legislators. On July 241 2007, Commission made a presentation on ,the Commission's Grade Separation Strategy before a group of city . managers and,_ mayors in Asse.mbiyman Bill ,Emmerson's district. The . Assemblyman hosted -:the gathering of approximately 60 people that focused on goods movement transportation issues in both Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Federal Update Status of. the Foothill South Toll Road in Doubt The final segment of the Foothill -Eastern Toll Corridor is often referred to as the Foothill -South —.a 17-.mile :extension of the existing. SR-241 toll road between . Rancho Santa Margarita and San Onof re. - The current Foothill and Eastern toll corridors are widely used .by many Riverside County commuters who travel to jobs in Irvine and other locations in Orange County and serve as an alternative to the heavily congested SR-55. - The Foothill -South extension will probably .not be used as extensively by Riverside County residents. as the northern portion of SR-241 and 261; however, it is the last -component of an effective toll road system that has. improved mobility throughout the ,region. Agenda Item 17 78. Approximately eight years ago, Congress approved legislation to allow the United States Navy , to provide an easement. to allow for the location of a significant. portion of :th'i`s i tollway extensiow� to 'be located on -federal land. ' Recently, Congresswoman Susan Davis of San Diego attached an amendment to' the Defense Appropriations Bill that will undermine this easement and could undo years of environmental review regarding this corridor and jeopardizes its viability. The appropriations -bill has been approved by the House of Representatives, 'but has yet to be taken up by the Senate. Given the fact that many of nation's def ense forces: are in harm's way, defense bills always receive overwhelming support and can be considered veto -proof. As a result they are often saddled with amendments that aren't always germane to the bill's main purpose. This proposed' Foothill -South facility has been controversial for many years, but the Transportation Corridor Agencies has been diligent in responding to environmental concerns regarding this corridor. Originally, the facility was first incorporated in Orange County's Master Plan of Highways in 1981, resulting in more than 26 years of consideration. Some proponents have suggested that this might be one of the most heavily. previewed and studied transportation corridors in the history. of the nation. The foothill -Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency has been working with various government agencies and `S si�ess groups to garner support for the; project and receive Senate support to remove the anti -toll road provision in the appropriations bill. 'Local Riverside County Congressional Representatives Ken Calvert and Darrell Issa- have been especially vocal advocating this position and have expressed concerns regarding the long-term impacts if the corridor is not constructed: This facility has been included in the Regional Transportation 'Plan for a number of years and its. elimination `will impact :.the overall plan:, its transportation .and air quality modeling. While recognizing that there is significant environmental opposition to this project, failing to build'a project that has been planned for more than 20 years ,will have an impact -on Southern California's overall mobility. Moreover, as Riverside County considers . new transportation corridors both within the county and connecting to neighboring counties, the use of parliamentary maneuver to amend. an Appropriations Bi l to affect a local project is especially disturbing. Staff recommends that the Commission join many other organizations and local governments in formalsupport of the development of the Foothill -South.: The Commission need not endorse a specific alignment or project details, but should express the Commission's :support for the facility. The Support position would be communicated to California's ,,Senators in advance of the Senate's consideration: of the Defense Appropriations bill. Other supporters already ' on record include the Automobile Club'. of Southern California, California Chamber of Commerce, Agenda Item 17 79 AFL-CIO, the Building and Construction Trades Council and the California Labor Federation. Among those opposed to the Foothill -South are the Surfrider Foundation and the Sierra Club. Bridge Failure Leads to Gas Tax Increase Proposal Congressman James Oberstar (D-Minnesota), who serves. as Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, will be introducing a proposal to raise the federal gas tax by five cents to pay for 'bridge repairs throughout the nation. The bill would establish a three-year program to raise - $8.5 billion. A Congressional Hearing on bridge safety is scheduled for September 5, 2007 when Congress returns from its summer recess. Chairman Oberstar has yet to introduce the actual legislation; Commission staff will return .with more information once the bill is introduced. Attachment: Legislative Matrix i • Agenda Item 17 Cl) 5) L 0 Z 0 p H 0 a Q cc F" H M O W FO W AMMWI o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ax z3 r r r (� r :' JylkWy3/ . `Ifiwp, CL CL CL CIL r=3 50 50 50 • V y. O n _ O O I U) Qi c2`c sF `�,n • � ..Q E 0 Q .� a) iz O 0a> Q _ �.. C E co . E i N 0 I . E E i r (13 o " o _0 co U 'o m a 7 CL , U) o .� a - � o .� •Q � ��, o °4-- •Q � ors 0U coU a� 0 v,U (D or. (b ca co,U m o n u U .o r. U a o N. o -� a) ?' Q om- CL c) Q" C OL Q C a o d c-0 a o >-:0 O co '4- V O >,:0 C a( 0 0 .F C O >, 0 O Q I Q. 0 Q >-•0 C O. I -0 c Q >, C -0 co Q O -0 i 4••. Co r. 0. o-0. o co 'F- -0 i 0 0 o ate),Q +-o(a co >- CE30 -0 4- 0 a)- -0 0' -0 4- >. ' Qi 0 o A6f Z +_ -O ++ > . 0 o 0. 0c o -co v a) �-, O a_ a _ CL 0- Co Q- 0) v) E o o a C 0 'E' a C �` O C 0 ai 0o Q•L v�o f--. m �C U 00 w con QL.. v? o Q F-- a Q cL co¢ cOn Q m Q co[ Lx cn U F` u¢ ;�` Is C 0.- m ca O ''^^• co C C C o y C -�- O •,F VJ }. 0 C CoU cc y - L p +7 U L _ - Q) E c-• - - -O cn a; 0 3' U Q) 0 V r-, v) 0 U `►- Q . 2 ..� 0 -� fi c0 >, O Ca- o OL Coo 0 o}, M ".�Q U) •— co C -0 $ C Co U co co ID D C O U _ 0 L co r -00 Q Q 0 �,��' O O , '.+�,�0 C s] Cow.4- oE no O' O `�a�+� '" +-0 LO C'O.°� CD O 0 CL C 0 o O � cxo CL .0 r +-+ c �,•� L � o c(00'vOi v � �,.cn �p �.,. �, a C CD X L V) Q- a) co - a) . Q C C- o CL O -j C 00 � U C O co co O C L co O co .�_ . O O 0 C.co U U it p i L a 0 u) '- co v) a .. _ C r .- O °U a�+ _ L o �4-+�.. 0 0+-+-U o �U (Q,a 4 �• o _0 C C oo O O L a c Em+' O O C �- 4-- •0 _� 00-- - 0 Q U �• a V N". N -0 C C 3 1 L N a) +`D C v) w O C E U Q. �. U C - L L O 0 O o_ 'a) o > - - ( +, _0 � +� N ++ L W- Y �'-C 0 ? -C v) . 41 tEi U L 0 Q �' a) 41 C L C U 7 L CU +' +- 0 M=.m y .4� CD N '— — _ 0 CD C O �. 0'a c�vm O O O N L L +� v) L :C m :Ii +� - :O N. L _ o v) 0. > > C a) CO � -0 _� Cn r CO �- 0 N a 0Co > o }. CL -0 ai m 0}: O 3 C N .L L -C ca 1-- �bc to" " O O C� O N O t ON O O O _C � Q J F- �- • F- to U U O F- .+�. C _ Fr- t/� U vy H c . a . H }- 06 4 CO 3 +, ,O CU C �V O N M m O LO QWmOm C r- > v- ct m0 m.0 'm Cal m O NJ 00 "....:: O n O O O O 0 0 •— cM cY) >.. N N O O O L 0 O O o a) U) O O N O c Q 0- Q Q. a a f3 O- CD cn cn cn o o aa) coU) Q) o -(D 0 AD i (U aoi aa3) m CO U E Z E aci aCCa E E� E aci E �� E E t•` — N (D aEi �, o 0 a c V a) U aL Q 0 �,oEoa CU a)U 3 aEi �,o.►-..ate wU o� u,o,,_ a—, �,U on Q c co � co _ acNw� ac-CLo a�-�CiL -:0Q'co a) ca� >..oQoa) >.:0co t :�co ��coQ 2Y ✓ti - p -0 O ap /R Yam. a) c O cm V �- +; O C a) c O �amQ� -0 mom i r 4. a) o a) �.� <o > CL a_ o u, �' o m +-� O c - E� o >Q�CL o v, m o 0� .n +, >Q o Co c E p m +� >,Q- E o;�n E m QcmQU -aE0 aca`)ao�aoa)E a(D ME (� CL 4- Q ca n 4 a0 morn =t)O Q�y- Q�n Q�- �'Q QOQF- a� E � O �Q� Q� E o Q<� co c oL:E'Q o - L 0) E m c ° 0 Ca 0� �� c c= `a a E W> a 0 S E E 0, a) E.L . -C ++ L `F Q CID ca _ U 7 a) ca a) CD c): _ a D '� N L Q m m 4O m m tJ L -0 —� 0 %.- O' a) U O a) {+ v, •0 +' C a U t ea O t � m CD m .. -O --n: -p 0 :. O > a) cl p 0) _ . : ; 3 O c :. - O :.c c +�+ ". p " .. y a) +� ;t ~ m _ c m co O m m s3 cn a) m +_� L> > > — C to. O +� o cn _��� t o r- -O c �-Eye O +, C. _ tea). C a) a) -O L - m p l� +-+ `- m 0= O p� ,_- W p c U c a) m L( L O (Lp m m +J 'O C E c O �'' O y- N +' U o •' �. (o O 'O !!) -0 � c c6 � p N Q N L E O -0 _ :c c O Z7 O t6 ._. Co m c 3 ca u3 L p N O p L a) N a a) c `- o C N to U' c Qi 0 -y >O (n a' c C) C— :._ E +' '*' 0 c u `� m � ►� o 4, ., - a) � ca � . c � o L O _,o `�- :c .. O. m O m ,, �. m L a) U a) a-+ c L_ C U ,� +� m m o E L m t c O L a) . Q L- +� 0,0 Q L a)CID 4- to ca a) C O 0 co c '-(o CID C2. _0 to C . p L L --O , m E = >. �>+ •O E c m 0 ' N -'Co p m CIDm + j m m Q CL +� "a .LL p �' Q >' O U E C.?O. a O O V C) .� -Q C O per,,, C m, m E 0 C3 O +� L 0 O E N ca 00 a) p y O -v o a) 'C co 0-5 L _ m Q E - co a) —420 CID o' � o >- > cu, : O U a) L —0) 0 +-' -o F L +: -o c "O c a) ca N p o >- > cn — L . ,-• 0-0 . C m: c t� +j m C p -p L � +; >- '0 Cl) T_i c CID +co .y c U) V. o a) Q t. -0 a) L o t +' N _3 O a) - a) -o L c V '0 fo a) co a) ca t to 3 � Cl) U) r to ,N U m Q V . y +� :� ` C _� _ CD to o m C.) L U) pU ) > cnaC �— n a) Q A a) X ca Up� _a) UC -C m co CO Q !fi y- a C+ Lo >� N a) . CD �C U _ — +j +� _ — Ca u CO CID o Cr' E s tc p > > EQmE - o o m co, CD o 0 CID . -� a -• L to C V -- ,'.� : p_ a) o m —Co -0v0 CID ,0 Co ?d -0 w-M co +.• m c 0- nHa n s3ca E+ iv .. +. 4► caCID s (0,C v cCD 00 Lo Mn � No � �cn Nv cca V) " " 0 0 0 o 0 0 a Q. a Q U) cn � ` r o a) � C6 E � �� \ Q w c E c CN ,srr Q L Q Q, , 03 N 'M "O W 0 414-. 'a a�� o a? o-- 0 c a c L �v cad cCD oEmcn_C4��0 CO aD -r3Up Ecv C'Ee- 0ci (, ��`- L ao+�� QE V1 -0Ec- N 0 a)c3>r'LCE Y Oto =00 ., CDo _c�� r m ��� m 0  a) c co E(D L Co Q-��c�� .0 m L . N L- L ��Qc6 � U N v)  L E - co .. c v,..ja_ i oc3 0 c Y E Q � CD C Q ��, -. �� LL _0 =Co O ` ca ��.���� C + a a) o m c �� � ' in Co Q C N CD a. > +' N C (D > Q- > C.)� co.o o c a >v c Q�� E c co- �� c cn� 0CD a E +-,a)-co �T: -c > a�� a? Lo+" c �' D CO c +��-00m m 0 c C>toE o Q. +5 4.- `��- m @`�`v,c is C N ( (D Z > 0- c: ��E'C`�� ` .i a) � � c �� C s C U D o E0 ��E �� C U_) wCn����C 00) ��O N _oo.a+w _0 .0 cooC Ea+- Cl)o +�o nca i L XC co yc a) NV Ca N �� O> �� o+ar�� E ("����E swEa o._�� oo g E m - E a�� _ ` �� CC)L Cl a? �� c' Co cv T- _�� ��' -0 c (DnEx >��.'�Q� (0-0 dOL ��.o op'E E._ c`a }' U�� cn H . a .co Co ��-- a) ��' n. o N r- LO p, Z C) C f�� O v `_ C N CD co Q? W � m m Q Q41 fi Q-0 Z