Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout05 May 22, 2008 Transit Policy84017 RECORDS RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON TRANSIT POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA TIME: 10:00 a.m. DATE: Thursday, May 22, 2008 LOCATIONS: Conference Room C, Fifth Floor Riverside County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside 4th District, Riverside County (Teleconference Site) 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 222 Palm Desert, CA 92260 *** COMMITTEE MEMBERS *** Roger Berg, Chair / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Frank Hall, Vice -Chair / Malcolm Miller, City of Norco, John Chlebnik / Ray Quinto, City of Calimesa Michael H. Wilson / Melanie Fesmire, City of Indio Frank West / Charles White, City of Moreno Valley Daryl Busch / Mark Yarbrough, City of Perris Steve Adams / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside, District II Jeff Stone, County of Riverside, District III Roy Wilson, County of Riverside, District IV *** STAFF *** Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director * * * AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY * * * Policy directions to prepare for transit vision and to bring regional perspective to transit Monitor transit implementation Performance of transit operators and its services Comments are welcomed by the Committee. If you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. 11.36.39 " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSIT POLICY COMMITTEE www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 10:00 a.m. Thursday, May 22, 2008 CONFERENCE ROOM C Riverside County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, Fifth Floor, Riverside, 92501 and 4th District, Riverside County (Teleconference Site) 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 222, Palm Desert, 92260 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Items not listed on the agenda) 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 21, 2008 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS - The Committee may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Committee. If there are less than 2/3 of the Committee members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR - Al/ matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. Transit Policy Committee Agenda May 22, 2008 Page 2 6A. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AMENDMENT Overview This item is for the Committee to: Page 1 1) Allocate $1,399,784 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) operating funds to cover federal and Measure A funding shortfalls for operating assistance; 2) Allocate $444,000 in TDA State Transit Assistance (STA) capital funds to cover cost increases in the purchase of paratransit buses; 3) Approve Amendment No. 3 to the SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) FY 2007/08 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect the additional funding outlined above; 4) Amend the FY 2007/08 Budget by $1,843,784 to reflect the additional funding outlinedabove; and 5) Forward to the Commission for final action. 6B. PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AMENDMENT Overview This item is for the Committee to: Page 4 1) Reallocate $100,000 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) State Transit Assistance (STA) capital funds from the Clean Natural Gas (CNG) fueling station project to the Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA) new office project; 2) Approve Amendment No. 1 to the PVVTA FY 2007/08 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect the reallocation of funding among the capital projects as outlined above; and. 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. • • " " Transit Policy Committee Agenda May 22, 2008 Page 3 7. TRANSIT VISION ADOPTION AND RELATED FUNDING FORMULAS FOR TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT AND MEASURE A FUNDS FOR 2009-2019 Overview This item is for the Committee to: Page 5 1) Adopt the Transit Vision for 2009-2019; 2) Continue the existing funding formula for the Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds [Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) funds]: a) Coachella Valley  100% public bus operator; b) Palo Verde Valley  100% public bus operator (subjectto the statutory "unmet needs hearing"); c) Western Riverside County  78% public bus and 22% commuter rail operators; 3) Establish a funding formula for the Western Riverside County Public Transit Account of Measure A Ordinance No. 02-001: a) Allocate the Commuter Rail and Intercity Bus Service funds  80% Commuter Rail and 20% Western Riverside County Public Bus Operators; b) Allocate 25% of Western Riverside County Specialized Transit funds to the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) as the Consolidated Transportation Service Agency for Western Riverside County; 4) Approve a timeline for the TDA and Measure A funding formulas to be reviewed in FY 2018/19 withproposed changes to be implemented in FY 2020/21; and 5) Forward to the Commission for final action. Transit Policy Committee Agenda May 22, 2008 Page 4 8. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MEASURE A SPECIALIZED TRANSIT INTERIM FUNDING Overview This item is for the Committee to: 9. Page 33 1) Approve up to $433,481 of additional Western Riverside County Measure A Specialized Transit funds to the approved grantees identified in Attachment 1 contingent upon grantee submittal of the Commission's Universal Specialized Transit application by June 16, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to extend the applicable grantee contracts through September 30, 2008; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. FISCAL YEARS 2008/09 - FY 2010/11 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS Page 37 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Review and approve, in concept, the FY 2008/09 - FY 2010/11 Short Range Transit Plans for the cities of Banning, Corona, Riverside, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA), Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine), and the Commission's Regional Commuter Rail Program, as presented; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. ADJOURNMENT The next Transit Policy Committee meeting is scheduled to be held at 10:00 a.m., Thursday, July 17, 2008, Conference Room C, County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Fifth Floor, Riverside, 92501. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSIT POLICY COMMITTEE ROLL CALL MAY 22, 2008 Present County of Riverside, District II County of Riverside, District 111 County of Riverside, District IV City of Beaumont City of Calimesa City of Indio City of Moreno Valley City of Norco City of Perris City of Riverside City of Temecula Absent )27 TRANSIT POLICY COMMITTEE COMMISSIONER SIGN -IN SHEET MAY 22, 2008 AGENCY E MAIL ADDRESS A/04'co /i0 I zg®,3e/, co 44, zi'l3 -r pt --0712A3 i�ero. c cc 1E-PPIE‘'JLA CAL/ t-I es- /I " AGENDA ITEM 4 " MINUTES " i RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON TRANSIT POLICY COMMITTEE February 21, 2008 Minutes 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Transit Policy Committee was called to order by Chair Frank West at 10:02 a.m. in Conference Room C, County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Fifth Floor, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Members Present Steve Adams Roger Berg Daryl Busch John Chlebnik Frank Hall Ron Roberts Jeff Stone John F. Tavaglione Frank West Michael Wilson* Roy Wilson* *teleconference site Members Absent 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests to speak from the public. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JULY 19 AND NOVEMBER 15, 2007 M/S/C (Adams/Busch) to approve the minutes of July 19 and November 15, 2007 as submitted. Transit Policy Committee Minutes February 21, 2008 Page 2 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS There was additional information on Agenda Item 8, `Proposed Augmentation to Fare Box Recovery Policy". 6. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board, provided an overview of election of officers for 2008 in accordance with the. Administrative Code. At this time, Chair West opened nominations for the slate of officers and nominated Roger Berg for the Chair position and Frank Hall for the Vice Chair position. The nomination was seconded by Commissioner John Tavaglione. No other nominations were received. Chair West closed the nominations. Commissioners Roger Berg and Frank Hall were unanimously elected as the Transit Policy Committee's Chair and Vice Chair, respectively. At this time, Commissioner Berg assumed the Chair. 7. COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT -HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN Brian Champion, Program Manager, provided a brief update on the Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Coordination Plan (Coordinated Plan) and introduced Heather Menninger, AMMA, to present staff recommendations as well as the findings through a survey of public human service organizations and the public transit providers, in addition to technical and stakeholder workshops. Heather Menninger explained the Coordinated Plan is in the final stages of the process and discussed the following areas: • Overview of the Coordinated Plan — Coordinated Plan review and plan recommendations; • Coordinated Plan for Riverside County — A locally developed comprehensive, unified plan tied to three federal programs and the need and resource assessment activities; • Needs by area — Palo Verde Valley, Coachella Valley, and Western Riverside; • Institutional Needs — Public operators and human services agencies; Transit Policy Committee Minutes February 21, 2008 Page 3 • Needs by target group — Low income individuals, persons with disabilities and seniors that are frail or low income; • Service gaps; • Framework for coordination; • Coordination leadership goal, capacity building goal, information portals goal, and the coordination policies goal; • Translating objectives to strategies — Building infrastructure; extending service quantity and quality, creating information strategies to address unmet needs, and promoting coordination policies; • Project selection and evaluation, and coordination program evaluation; and • Coordinated Plan next steps. Commissioner John Tavaglione requested clarification that the human services agencies included non-profit organizations and asked if staff recommends that each of these agencies have a specialist on staff for this purpose. Additionally, he asked if workshops will be held in order to help and encourage the agencies to respond to the call for projects. Heather Menninger replied that at the regional level, there needs to be some common points of entry. At an agency level, a portion of a staff person's time could be a fundable activity if a project was addressing trip needs. She stated there does not need to be a full-time staff person, but the agency should have an institutionalized understanding about transit system functions. Some of these answers will evolve depending on how the agencies respond to the call for projects. Additionally, she explained the process began with three project development workshops in September and October 2007 and there will be technical assistance activity workshops scheduled for May through July 2008. Brian Champion added that a database has been created for the public service agencies and those agencies were notified of the workshops. Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director, explained as part of the call for projects, staff will hold these workshops to encourage agencies to understand how to complete the application. She stated staff has created a universal application so the agencies do not need to complete four federal applications for various sources of funding. Commissioner Daryl Busch requested staff to create a technical advisory committee in order for the public agencies to get involved and provide and receive input. Transit Policy Committee Minutes February 21, 2008 Page 4 Brian Champion replied staff has a technical advisory committee for the Coordinated Plan. Stephanie Wiggins stated one of the opportunities is to leverage this effort with the existing statutorily required Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). Brian Champion stated that members of the CAC were asked to participate on the evaluation panel and four members volunteered. He stated staff is trying to build momentum among the community and elected officials in order to keep the process moving forward. Commissioner Tavaglione recommended contacting Susan Loew, Department of Public Social Services (DPSS), to brief her on the program and ask her to relay its critical importance to the DPSS staff and include that Supervisors Stone, Tavaglione, and Wilson suggested Commission staff contact her. Chair Berg recommended conducting regionalize meetings in each city within Riverside County in order to have the transit providers and elected officials come together to determine if county and state funding is being utilized properly. He expressed that there needs to be a more efficient way to run this program and concurred with Commissioner Tavaglione's recommendation to contact Susan Loew for assistance. M/S/C to receive and file a presentation on the Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan. 8. PROPOSED AUGMENTATION TO THE FARE BOX RECOVERY POLICY Brian Champion explained the Commission's fare box .recovery policy is periodically revised to reflect the change in statutes, or .the reinterpretation of statutorily language and the last revision was in October 2004, and highlighted the following areas: • Purpose of revision — revise exclusion and exemption section and incorporate definitions of operating and capital costs; • Funding sources — Transportation Development Act (TDA), Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance fund (STA); • Fare box recovery ratio; • New and increased services; • Existing and revised interpretations of TDA; and • Definition of terms — operating costs defined in statute and capital costs defined by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). • Transit Policy Committee Minutes February 21, 2008 _ Page 5 M/S/C (Busch/Stone) to: 1) Review and approve including the definition of Operating Costs to Calculate Fare box ratios; 2) Review and approve including the definition of Capital -Related Expenses Below Capitalization Thresholds; 3) Review and approve including the definition of Operating Cost Exclusions and Exemptions; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Transit Policy Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:38 a.m. The next .meeting is scheduled to be held at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, May 22, 2008, in Conference Room A, Riverside County Transportation Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, California, 92501 and the teleconference site at Riverside County 4th District Office, 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 222, Palm Desert, California, 92260. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board s AGENDA ITEM 6A " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: May 22, 2008 TO: Transit Policy Committee FROM: Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director THROUGH: John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: SunLine Transit Agency's Fiscal Year 2007/08 Short Range Transit Plan Amendment STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Allocate $1,399,784 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) operating funds to cover federal and Measure A funding shortfalls for operating assistance; 2) Allocate $444,000 in TDA State Transit Assistance (STA) capital funds to cover cost increases in the purchase of paratransit buses; 3) Approve Amendment No. 3 to the SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) FY 2007/08 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect the additional funding outlined above; 4) Amend the FY 2007/08 Budget by $1,843,784 to reflect the additional funding outlined above; and 5) Forward to the Commission for final action BACKGROUND INFORMATION: SunLine is requesting an amendment to the current FY 2007/08 SRTP to cover funding shortfall in Measure A, State Transit Assistance, LTF, and Section 5307 federal funding. A. Request $1,399,784 in LTF funding to cover shortfalls for operating assistance. The following provides a summary for each LTF funding request. 1) Request $401,567 in LTF Funds to Cover Federal Funding Shortfall In FY 2007/08, SunLine was approved to receive $3,749,387 in funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for capital assistance to fund projects identified in its FY 2007/08 SRTP. However, FTA appropriated only $3,347,820 of the amount originally Agenda Item 6A 1 requested. As a result of the federal funding shortfall, additional LTF funding in the amount of $401,567 is required to fully fund the preventive maintenance program. 2) Request $760,000 in LTF Funds to Cover Measure A Funding Shortfall: In the FY 2007/08 SRTP, SunLine was approved to receive $4,129,000 in Measure A funds; however, due to the economic downturn that amount has been reduced by $760,000, as reported at the February 13, 2008 Commission meeting. As a result, SunLine is requesting $760,000 in LTF to cover the shortfall. 3) Request $238,217 in LTF Funds as Local Match for FY 2006 Section 5316 Job Access Reverse Commute (JARC) and Section 5317 New Freedom for Operating Assistance: SunLine staff was recently informed by the Commission that the FY 2006 Section 5316 Jobs Access Reverse Commute ($162,641) and Section 5317 New Freedom ($75,576) apportioned to the Coachella Valley would lapse in September 2008. The Commission stated it recommended SunLine as the designated receiver to prevent the funds from lapsing. The combined total amount for both funds is $238,217, which will be used to expand fixed route service in the Coachella Valley. Because the funds are for operating assistance, there is a required match of 50%. As a result, SunLine is requesting $238,217 in LTF as the local match. B. Request $444,000 in STA Funds to Cover Cost Shortage in Purchasing Paratransit Buses. 1) Request $444,000 in STA funds to cover shortfall in the funding of the cost of replacement buses in FY 2005/06 as well as FY 2007/08. The breakdown of the amount requested is shown in the table below. a) In the FY 2005/06 SRTP, SunLine was approved to purchase paratransit buses; nine of which was for replacement buses and two for expansion buses. At the time when the SRTP was approved, the cost per each bus was estimated at $55,000. However, based on the actual cost of $91,000 per bus, the amount approved in the FY 2005/06 SRTP is $396,000 less than the original amount approved. Staff is therefore requesting STA funds in the amount of $396,000 to make up the short fall. Agenda Item 6A 2 " " " b) Staff is also requesting $48,000 in STA funds to make up the difference in the cost of 16 paratransit buses approved in the FY 2007/08 SRTP. The approved amount in the SRTP was $88,000 per bus; however, based on the actual cost per bus which is $91,000, the amount approved in the SRTP is $3,000 less per bus for a total of $48,000 less than the amount approved. Staff is therefore requesting STA funds in the amount of $48,000 to make up the shortfall. As a result of the additional funding requests above, the Commission needs to approve a budget amendment for the LTF and STA funds. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: $1,843,784 Source of Funds: Coachella Va ley LTF = $1,399,784 Coachella Valley STA= $ 443,035 Budget Adjustment: Yes GLA No.: 601 62 86101 $1,399,784 241 62 86102 $ 444,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \l/b  ,,tat.5u'iuyn��o Date: 05/16/08 Agenda Item 6A 3 " AGENDA ITEM 6B " " RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: May 22, 2008 TO: Transit Policy Committee FROM: Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director THROUGH: John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency's Fiscal Year 2007/08 Range Transit Plan Amendment Short STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Reallocate $100,000 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) State Transit Assistance (STA) capital funds from the Clean Natural Gas (CNG) fueling station project to the Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA) new office project; 2) Approve Amendment No. 1 to the PVVTA FY 2007/08 Short Range Transit " Plan ISRTP) to reflect the reallocation of funding among the capital projects as outlined above; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: PVVTA is requesting an amendment to the current FY 2007/08 SRTP to reallocate $100,000 of TDA STA capital funds from the CNG fueling station project to the PVVTA new office project. The reallocation will assist with acquiring property for the new transit office. The PVVTA Board approved the SRTP amendment request at its April 2008 meeting. No budget amendment is required to support this amendment request. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2007/08 Amount: $100,000 Source of funds: Palo Verde Valley STA Budget Ad ustment: No GLA No.: 241 62 86102 $100,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \14 Date: 05/16/08 Agenda Item 6B 4 AGENDA ITEM 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: May 22, 2008 TO: Transit Policy Committee FROM: Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director THROUGH: John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Transit Vision Adoption and Related Funding Formulas for Transportation Development Act and Measure A Funds for 2009-2019 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Adopt the Transit Vision for 2009-2019; 2) Continue the existing funding formula for the Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds [Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) funds]: a) Coachella Valley — 100% public bus operator; b) Palo Verde Valley — 100% public bus operator (subject to the statutory "unmet needs hearing"); c) Western Riverside County — 78% public bus and 22% commuter rail operators; 3) Establish a funding formula for the Western Riverside County Public Transit Account of Measure A Ordinance No. 02-001: a) Allocate the Commuter Rail and Intercity Bus Service funds — 80% Commuter Rail and 20% Western Riverside County Public Bus Operators; b) Allocate 25% of Western Riverside County Specialized Transit funds to the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) as the Consolidated Transportation Service Agency for Western Riverside County; 4) Approve a timeline for the TDA and Measure A funding formulas to be reviewed in FY 2018/19 with proposed changes to be implemented in FY 2020/21; and 5) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the May 18, 2006 Transit Policy Committee (TPC), staff was directed to work with the transit operators and program staff to develop a 10-year conceptual plan identifying capital and operating needs utilizing transportation funds. The Agenda Item 7 5 conceptual plan also provides the basis for allocating TDA and Measure A funds in Western Riverside County. The intent behind the conceptual planning process is to lay the foundation for creating a vision of transit service for Riverside County. TPC members may recall that the creation of a transit vision was one of the recommendations made in the Commission's FY 2001-03 Triennial Performance Audit. In developing the Transit Vision, the public transit operators and program staff have identified projects, participated in meetings, and discussed the needs for coordination of service, higher frequency service, transit centers, and funding. The Transit Vision is also influenced by the recent adoption of the Riverside County Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan), which identified needs to improve coordination between the public transit operators and non-profit human/health service providers in order to provide increased mobility and cost-effective transportation options for seniors, the disabled community, and low-income residents of Riverside County. The primary themes of the Transit Vision are: • Higher Frequency Transit Service; • Information Technology/Information Management; • Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through increased productive service and alternative fuels; • Reduction of costs of paratransit service through increased coordination between public transit operators and non-profit providers; • Leverage of Measure A and TDA funds with federal, state, and TUMF fund sources. The public operators and program staff have identified services that total $2.6 billion over the next 10 years: TRANSIT VISION (2009-2019) Roadmap Initiatives Bus Transit Estimated Total Cost (millions) Costs % of Total Improve Quality of Local Bus Service Coachella Valley = $276.9 million* Palo Verde Valley = $15.4 million Western Riverside County = $690 million *Includes costs for specialized transit in Coachella Valley $982.3 - 38.4% - Increase Express Bus Service Introduce Bus Rapid Transit Coachella Valley = $231.8 million Palo Verde Valley = $3.6 million Western Riverside County = $128.8 million $364.2 14.2% Agenda Item 7 6 • " Specialized Transit (western Riverside county only) Improve Choices for Seniors & Disabled while Reducing Rising Dial -A -Ride Costs $35 1.4% Commuter Rail (Western Riverside County Only) Existing Metrolink Service Expand Metrolink Service $771.4 $316.3 30.2% 12.4�/0 Commuter Assistance Program (Western Riverside County only) Expand the Carpool Lane System Improve Traffic Flow Through IT Promote Alternatives to Driving Alone $28.6 1 .1 % All Modes and Programs Link Growth with Transportation Centers/Facilities Coachella Valley = $17.5 million Palo Verde Valley = $2.6 million Western Riverside County = $39 million $59 1 2.3% TOTALS $2,556.9 million 100.0% The RCTC Transit Vision is based on five primary goals: Goal Increase Coordination with the Transit and Rideshare Community: Transit in Riverside County is provided by individual public, private, and non-profit organizations. Respective agencies provide service at regional, municipal, and local levels. Enhanced coordination between the multiple providers and development of public/private partnerships could improve service and intermodal and regional connections, resulting in increased ridership. Expected Outcome by 2019 4, Rising Costs of ADA trips by 30% T Local & Regional Service by 30% T Ridership by a Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 10% T Rideshare Participation by 20% Remove Barriers to Transit Use: Transit passengers oftentimes face barriers to their mobility when they use transit between cities and regions; when they link transit with other modes; and when they are unaware of the full range of transportation options: ROTC seeks to partner with the transit operators to remove these barriers through improved regional and intermodal mobility, fare integration, internal and external communications, and coordination of transit and rideshare resources. T Local & Regional Mobility by 40% '1` Commuter Rail Service by CAGR 14% i` Ridership by CAGR 10% Provide Efficient and Effective Transit and Rideshare Service: RCTC seeks to improve utilization of existing resources and incorporate new technology to provide efficient and effective transit and rideshare services. RCTC performance measures, such as the Productivity Improvement Program, will be used to evaluate the outcome of implementing the initiatives included in the Transit Vision. T Cost Effectiveness by 30% t Productivity of Services by 40% T Ridership by CAGR 10% " Rideshare Participation by 20% Agenda Item 7 7 Ensure Adequate Funding: Providing transit and T Return on Measure A by 25% T Expansion of Services by 30% Is Ridership by CAGR 10% rideshare services for the citizens of Riverside County requires a predictable and sufficient funding base to meet increasing service needs. Multiple strategies are required, including an allocation of locally generated funds, coordination of transportation funds from multiple sources, participating in competitive grant application processes, and obtaining continued federal and state support. Promote Energy Efficiency: In 2006, the State passed 4, GHG by at least 20% T Alternative Fuels in All Fleets the Global Warming Solutions Act, AB32. The programs and services outlined in the Transit Vision provide cost-effective reductions of greenhouse gases (GHG). The expected outcomes by 2019 are based upon performance data supplied by the transit operators and the rideshare program. The estimates are conservative and are contingent upon improved coordination between transit operators and human/health service providers to drive down costs and higher frequency bus and rail service. The TDA Funding Allocation Formula to Remain Unchanged The TDA is comprised of two elements: Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) funds. There are three areas of apportionment within Riverside County comprised of Coachella Valley, Palo Verde Valley, and Western Riverside County. LTF funds are derived from '/< of one cent of the state sales tax and are returned to source/apportionment area. STA funds are generated from the statewide sales tax on gasoline and diesel fuel and are allocated by the state to the Commission on the basis of population and as a percentage of transit fare revenue. In Coachella Valley, 100% of the funds are allocated to the public transit operator, SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine), for capital and operating expenses. In the Palo Verde Valley, LTF funds support transit services and local street and road improvements (upon a demonstration of no unmet transit needs). In Western Riverside County, the funds are allocated between public bus and commuter rail service. In December 2003, the Commission approved a change in the Western Riverside County formula for TDA for bus and commuter rail service to 78% for bus and 22% for commuter rail effective FY2004/05. The Commission also approved a timeline for the funding formula to be reviewed with proposed changes to be implemented in FY 2009/10. Agenda Item 7 8 • • " Completion of the Transit Vision allows for the opportunity to review the current allocation formula in Western Riverside County. Over the next 10 years, two new funding sources will be available to the public bus transit operators in Western Riverside County: Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5316 Jobs Access Reverse Commute (JARC), and FTA Section 5317 New Freedom (NF) funds, which could generate at least $10 million between FY 2010-19. These additional funds allow for increased capacity of TDA that can support the Transit Vision goals of higher frequency transit service and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, staff recommends that the funding formula for Western Riverside County remain unchanged along with the Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley formulas. Public Transit Measure A for Western Riverside County Measure A Ordinance No. 02-001 identifies $390 million in Western Riverside County to expand commuter rail, implement intercity bus services, and continue to expand programs to assist the elderly, disabled, and commuters. It is estimated that about one-third (or $130 million) of this amount will be available for the next 10 year period. The Ordinance identifies funding amounts for the Commuter Assistance Program and the Specialized Transit Program. For planning purposes, it is estimated that approximately $17 million is available for the Commuter Assistance Program and $28 million is available for the Specialized Transit Program. The two programs comprise $45 million of the $130 million identified in the Ordinance. The remaining balance of $85 million is estimated to be available for the Commuter Rail and Intercity Bus programs. Specialized Transit and the Consolidated Transportation Service Agency The Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA) designation was created in 1979, when the State passed Assembly Bill 120, "The Social Services Transportation Improvement Act." The purpose is to promote the benefits of coordinated transportation among specialized transportation providers. The agencies are charged with the development and implementation of regional coordination of services and improvement of transportation services to seniors, persons with disabilities, and the low-income disadvantaged. In Riverside County, the CTSA designees are RTA for Western Riverside County and SunLine for Coachella Valley. Measure A funds for specialized transit in Coachella Valley are allocated to SunLine. Currently, there is no designated allocation of Measure A funds to a public bus operator in Western Riverside County. Agenda Item 7 9 Traditionally, these funds are primarily made available to non-profit providers in Western Riverside County. However, the recent Commission adoption of the Coordinated Plan emphasized the need to improve coordination efforts between public transit and human service agencies to address the underserved/unmet transportation needs of seniors, persons with disabilities, and the truly needy. This priority is based on two factors: the forecast population increase for the senior and disabled population (almost 20% of the Riverside County population will be seniors by -2020) and the rising costs of paratransit service for public transit operators. Increasingly, the costs of paratransit or Dial -A -Ride service continue to outpace the costs of fixed route service, usually at a 2 to 1 ratio. This results in reduced farebox recovery ratios for the transit operators and less efficient service for its customers. Measure A does not mandate a farebox requirement and therefore allows the public transit operator and non-profit more flexibility in the funding of services. Measure A is also considered as local support revenue, which positively affects the farebox ratio. Based upon the Transit Vision goal to reduce the rising costs of paratransit service through increased coordination between public transit operators and non-profit providers, staff recommends a set aside of 25% of the Western Riverside County Specialized Transit Program to RTA as the designated CTSA. These funds would allow for greater efficiency and coordination among the public transit operators and the non-profit agencies in Western Riverside County through activities such as: • Programs that can direct consumers to the most cost-effective service for their individual needs; and • Increased outreach to Senior Centers and other large Dial -A -Ride consumers. This set -aside could generate $7 million over the 10-year period. In order to access these funds, RTA would identify the proposed use in its annual Short Range Transit Plan. The adoption of the Coordinated Plan also allows for the receipt of approximately $10 million to Western Riverside County from the new FTA JARC/NF programs over the next 10 years. These funds, along with the remaining 75% of the Western Riverside County Specialized Transit Program would be available for non- profit agencies as well as the public transit operators. . Coachella Valley and Specialized Transit As indicated above, SunLine is the designated CTSA for Coachella Valley. Measure A Ordirance No. 02-001 designates SunLine as the recipient of Public Transit Account (PTA) funds in Coachella Valley to be used to improve and expand public transit and specialized transportation services, which includes coordination Agenda Item 7 10 " activities among non-profit social service organizations. Approximately $64 million of Measure A will be available between 2009-2019. The adoption of the Coordinated Plan also allows for the receipt of approximately $3 million in Coachella Valley from the new FTA JARC/NF programs over the next 10 years. Palo Verde Valley and Specialized Transit Measure A Ord. No. 02-001 does not establish a PTA for Palo Verde Valley. Specialized Transit services, such as Dial -A -Ride, are funded through LTF. Commuter Rail and Intercity Bus Service $85 million is estimated to be available over the next 10 years for this Western Riverside County Measure A category, which seeks to support current and future Metrolink commuter rail service as well as intercity express bus service that feeds Metrolink service. The Transit Vision supports these services such as the Perris Valley Line and a future Metrolink extension to either San Jacinto or Temecula over the next 10 years. In addition, the Transit Vision supports the policy of peak period express bus service in advance of new commuter rail service, which is then adjusted to become express bus service to rail stations as new commuter rail service is implemented. RTA's CommuterLink bus routes that service Metrolink stations are an example of the types of services that can be supported by these Measure A funds. In order to support these initiatives, it is recommended that the funding formula for these funds provide 80% to commuter rail and 20% to public bus operators that provide the express bus service that is scheduled to meet Metrolink service. Currently, Metrolink passengers ride for free when traveling on express bus operated in Western Riverside County. The public bus operators are reimbursed by Metrolink and the Commission for the Metrolink passenger. It is anticipated that this reimbursement will continue in the future. In summary, the recommendation for the Western Riverside County Measure A  Public Transit category reinforces the goals of the Transit Vision by reinforcing coordination, enabling higher frequency transit service, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and leveraging Measure A funds with federal and state funds. Agenda Item 7 11 Recommendation: Program Public Bus (millions) Western Riverside Public Public Bus/ Non -Profit (millions) County Transit Account Commuter Rail (millions) Measure A Rideshare (millions) — TOTALS (millions) Rideshare N/A N/A N/A $17 $17 Specialized Transit $7* $21 N/A N/A $28 Commuter Rail & Intercity Bus $17 N/A $68 N/A $85 TOTALS $ 24 $ 21 $ 68 $17 $130 million "RTA set -aside for CTSA Timeline for Review of the TDA and Measure A Funding Formulas Periodically, the Commission reviews the transit funding formulas to ensure that the allocations continue to leverage and/or maximize existing transportation funding from an array of sources. As such, it is recommended that the Commission conduct a formal review prior to the completion of the first 10 years of receipt of funds from the Measure A extension. The Transit Vision concepts and funding formula recommendations were presented to the Citizens Advisory Committee on May 13, 2008. Attachment: Draft Transit Vision Agenda Item 7 12 Table of Contents Introduction 2 Decades of Investment used by today's commuters 2 Managing Growth 3 Facing the Future 3 Vision 2019 — Guiding Principles 4 Transit Vision Process 4 Transit Vision Goals 5 The Situation 6 Bus 6 Specialized Transit 6 Rail 7 Rideshare 7 Improving Air Quality through Cleaner Fuels 8 Trends Affecting Transportation 8 Population Explosion 8 Emergence of Paratransit Needs 9 Quality of Life Issues: Congestion & Air Quality 9 Energy Efficiency 10 Growth in Information Technology 10 The Roadmap — Laying Out the Plan for Future Services 10 Bus Transit 10 Specialized 12 Commuter Rail 12 Commuter Assistance Program 12 All Modes & Programs 13 Delivering the Goods — the Financial Proposition 14 Financial Resources 15 Measuring the Benefits 18 Performance Metric: Improve Mobility 18 Performance Metric: Protect our transportation resources 19 Performance Metric: Enhance the quality of life 19 Critical Success Factors 20 Conclusion 20 Draft— Transit Vision 1 " " Introduction Created by State law in 1976, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) oversees funding and coordination of all public transportation services within Riverside County. In 2006, RCTC began development of a countywide vision for transit in response to a Triennial Performance Audit recommendation. This document is the culmination of input from the transit operators in Riverside County and RCTC Rideshare and Specialized Transit staff. It is intended to guide the RCTC transit vision and allocation of the Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Measure "A" extension program over the next 10 years. The direction that is taken will determine where valuable resources will be expended and how technology will be used to improve services. The RCTC Regional Programs Department is committed to meeting the goals and actively participating in carrying out. the initiatives included in the Vision Plan. The collective efforts of RCTC and the County's eight transit operators will prove vital in meeting the mobility needs of Riverside County citizens. They will also serve to keep Riverside County on the national forefront in the provision of transit services. Decades of Investment used by today's commuters Knowing the importance of mobility to our quality of life and the economy, Riverside County voters approved a one half -cent sales tax in 1988 that is currently funding transportation projects. These include freeway, roadway, and transit projects found throughout the County. Furthermore, local developer fee programs are in place in every city within the County so that new developments pay for their share of regional traffic improvements. When 78.9% of voters approved Measure "A", RCTC became the agency charged with making sure the projects and programs voters wanted became a reality. A stated goal in Measure "A", Ordinance 88-1, is to "Improve and maintain the quality of life in Riverside County by supplementing existing funds for transportation." The Ordinance identifies specific public transit and rideshare programs by geographic apportionment area as outlined below in Table 1: Measure A Ord. 88-1 Program Geographic Western Riverside County Apportionment Area Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley' Specialized Transit $31 M $12 M - Commuter Buses, Vanpools, & Carpools $31 M Commuter Rail $100 M - - Bus Replacement & More Service - $12 M - 'Palo Verde Valley identified the urgent need for Measure A as funding for local streets and roads only. Riverside County's bus system, comprised of seven operators, is an efficient, technologically up-to-date fleet. Moreover, by taking advantage of existing railways and 13 1 partnering with neighboring counties, RCTC established a successful commuter rail system, operated by Metrolink, with ridership growing every year. All in all, we have a transportation system to be proud of —one that reflects Riverside County's high quality of life and entrepreneurial spirit. Managing Growth Despite all of the positives, traffic congestion exists today on every Riverside County freeway and major portions of the roadway system. Riverside County's population and employment will keep growing, and traffic congestion will worsen unless we continue to enhance our transportation facilities and services. Trying to eliminate gridlock by focusing solely on highways is not practical. Building more highways has become very expensive and can take decades - major reasons why, over the past 20 years, the number of motor vehicle -miles traveled has grown some 70 percent while the number of highway -miles has barely changed. This transformation brings challenges since most freeways and roadways have little available right-of-way remaining, leaving limited room to grow. Yet demand for these facilities is projected to keep growing along with population and employment. At the same time, traditional funding sources for public transit and rideshare programs are not keeping pace with growth. Riverside County's local answer to funding needs - the one half -cent sales tax known as Measure "A" was renewed by voters in 2002 and now extends through 2039. Driving alone accounts for the highest level of land consumption among all transportation modes. It also generates the highest level of environmental, economic and social impacts. Increasing the use of alternative modes to work (e.g., carpool, transit) is critical to accommodate future growth with less environmental, economic and social impacts. — State of the Region 2006 (SCAG) page 83 Facing the Future In addition to the daily activities required to keep Riverside County mobile in 2007, the RCTC is planning for the future. In 2006, the Commission approved a 10-year Western Riverside County Highway Delivery Plan. The purpose of the Transit Vision is to develop a 10-year county -wide transit and rideshare plan that continues to promote transportation options for residents, workers, employers, and visitors. • The Transit Vision allows Riverside County residents, businesses, and elected officials to look at the big picture and ask key questions about the future. What will Riverside County look like in 10 years? Where will jobs and homes be concentrated and how will this affect congestion? What transportation- services and facilities will residents and workers need? What are the gaps in planned AAR: Policy and Economics Department, May 2007 14 " services? And what are the most efficient and effective ways to meet commuter needs? Vision 2019 - Guiding Principles To develop a vision for transit and rideshare programs in Riverside County based on: �% Improvedmobility and accessibility for Riverside County residents through working together with our transit partners to provide a safe, integrated, multi - modal transportation system; �% Performance measures for productivity and cost-effectiveness consistent with the Commission adopted Productivity Improvement Program; �% Air quality, energy efficiency, and economic development initiatives; �% Appropriately leverage Measure "A" funds to supplement existing funds for transportation. and " Allocate Measure "A" and Local Transportation Development funds for the period 2009  2019. The Transit Vision aligns our principles with the following RCTC existing priorities: " Promote Mobility  Create a transportation system that promotes efficient mobility both within the County and the region; " Ensure Improved System Efficiencies  Advocate affordable and advanced transportation technologies to improve safety and reduce congested corridors; " Foster Environmental Stewardship  Promote environmental stewardship and protect the area's natural resources and quality of life while achieving mobility goals; " Encourage Economic Development  Consider economic benefits of improvements and pursue transportation alternatives that enhance or complement economic development; and " Support Transportation Choices through Intermodalism and Accessibility Develop transportation alternatives. Transit Vision Process The Transit Vision process was conducted from April 2006 through April 2008. The process resulted in the development of near -term initiatives that have support among those who provided input and the transit community as a whole. The process entailed: " Visioning and priority setting with RCTC rideshare and specialized transit staff and the eight transit operators in Riverside County: o City of Banning o City of Beaumont o City of Corona o City of Riverside o Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency o Riverside Transit Agency z FY06 Adopted Commission Policies & Goals 15 3 o SunLine Transit Agency o Metrolink/RCTC Commuter Rail Program; • Conducting research on transit "best practices" across the country; • Professional facilitation of regional transportation needs and identification of service gaps; • Adoption of the Riverside County Public Transit -Human Services Coordinated Plan; and • On -going consultation with the RCTC Transit Policy Committee. Transit Vision Goals The RCTC Transit Vision is based on five primary goals: Goal Increase Coordination with the Transit and Rideshare Community: Transit Expected Outcome by 2019 40 Rising Costs of ADA trips by 30% + Local & Regional Service by 30% IN Ridership by CAGR 10% 'r Rideshare Participation by 20% in Riverside County is provided by individual public, private, and non-profit organizations. Respective agencies provide service at regional, municipal, and local levels. Enhanced coordination between the multiple providers and development of publiclprivate partnerships could improve service and intermodal and regional connections, resulting in increased ridership. Remove Barriers to Transit Use: Transit passengers oftentimes face T Local & Regional Mobility by 40% t Commuter Rail Service by CAGR 14% T Ridership by CAGR 10% barriers to their mobility when they use transit between cities and regions; when they link transit with other modes; and when they are unaware of the full range of transportation options. RCTC seeks to partner with the transit operators to remove these barriers through improved regional and intermodal mobility, fare integration, intemal and extemal communications, and coordination of transit and rideshare resources. Provide Efficient and Effective Transit and Rideshare Service: RCTC seeks T Cost Effectiveness by 30% '1. Productivity of Services ,by 40% ,r Ridership by CAGR 70% 4; Rideshare Participation by 20% to improve utilization of existing resources and incorporate new technology to provide efficient and effective transit and rideshare services. RCTC performance measures, such as the Productivity Improvement Program, will be used to evaluate the outcome of implementing the initiatives included in the Transit Vision. Ensure Adequate Funding: Providing transit and rideshare services for the T Return on Measure "A" by 25% I. Expansion of Services by 30% ,I, Ridership by CAGR 10% citizens of Riverside County requires a predictable and sufficient funding base to meet increasing service needs. Multiple strategies are required, including an allocation of locally generated funds, coordination of transportation funds from multiple sources, participating in competitive grant application processes, and obtaining continued federal and state support. Promote Energy Efficiency: In 2006, the State passed the Global .Warming GHG by at least 20% t Alternative Fuels in All Fleets Solutions Act, AB32. The programs and services outlined in the Transit Vision provide cost-effective reductions of greenhouse gases (GHG). 4 16 " " " The Situation The transit system in place today includes an extensive network of local bus routes that provide service to most residential and employment areas of the County. There are also expressbusroutes, and a commuter rail service, with CommuterLink express bus shuttles, that provide for longer distance travel within the County and to neighboring counties. Bus There are currently 62 bus routes operating throughout Riverside County, with the majority of the local bus service operating in Westem Riverside County. When compared to the Eastern half of the County, the western section is more densely developed, has lower medium incomes, has more households without an automobile, and a more consistent grid -pattern of roadways that lead to an efficient bus routing pattern. In fact, of the eight transit operators in Riverside Eastem half of the County, SunLine Transit an " The primary drive alone rate is 79%�, 4% lower than 1998; " Avg commute distance is 25.1 miles, the longest in the region & up from 21.6 in 1998 " Avg commute time to work is 46 minutes, the longest in the region & up from 37 minutes in 1998 " Second highest freeway usage at 65%, up from 59% in 1998 " 47% HOV lane availability, & 74% usage " The highest percentage of workers that work outside the county where they live at 35%, up from 32% in 1998 - State of the Commute 2006  SCAG County, only two agencies operate in the d Palo Verde Transit. Express buses combine the use of freeways and limited stops to provide commuters with faster service over longer distances. RTA operates two express bus routes using State Route 91 to connect Riverside County to Orange County. RTA also provides shuttle service timed with commuter rail schedules to carry passengers from the train stations to their places of work in the morning, and back to the stations in the evening. There are currently five shuttles operating in the CommuterLink system that use Interstate 10and 15, and State Route 60. Specialized Transit In addition to traditional local bus or fixed route service, the transit operators provide paratransit (or Dial -a -Ride) service for people unable to use the regular bus service because of a disability. This curb -to -curb service operates in response to requests by qualifying individuals and groups, and meets the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. In 1988, when voters passed Measure A, the half -cent sales tax for transportation, RCTC was empowered to use a portion of those revenues to provide seniors, persons with disabilities and the truly needy with transportation assistance. In addition to funding traditional public Dial -a -Ride services, the Commission has granted funds to non-profit agencies to provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas, for inter - community travel, and for riders having very special transit needs. As a result, 17 5 someone who is disabled can go to work on his or her own; someone who is aged can shop at the neighborhood grocery; and someone who is low on cash can get to the doctor. These programs have been successful over the last 20 years in providing improved transit access for western Riverside County residents however more needs to be done. Demand for local bus service has increased steadily over the past 20 years, reaching the current level of 11 million riders (2007), an increase of 116 percent. Today, the fleet of busses and dial -a -ride vehicles has grown to over 370, an increase of 158 percent since Measure "A" passed in 1988. Rail Metrolink operates commuter rail service in Riverside County. Metrolink provides weekday service on three routes through Riverside County: the Riverside Line from Riverside to Los Angeles (12 trains per day), the Inland Empire -Orange County Line from San Bernardino to San Juan Capistrano (16 trains per day); and the 91 Line from Riverside to Los Angeles (nine trains per day). There are five stations (Riverside - Downtown, Pedley, Riverside -La Sierra, West Corona, and North Main Corona) in Riverside County that feed these lines, all owned and operated by RCTC. Amtrak provides limited long distance passenger rail service, which runs two times a day in each direction through Riverside County although Amtrak trains do not stop at every RCTC Metrolink station. In just over 15 years since service began, the number of Riverside County riderson Metrolink commuter rail has increased from less than 100,000 passengers in 1993/94 to over 2 million passengers in 2006/07. In fact, the Inland Empire -Orange County Line, is the first suburb -to -suburb commuter rail line in the nation. Rideshare Commuter Assistance, or 'Rideshare programs to reduce the number of drive -alone travelers on our roadways, is a mandated part of Measure "A". Recognizing :the value of providing additional alternatives to driving alone, RCTC offers a comprehensive commuter assistance program to meet the needs of local employers and commuters and supports other RCTC services including commuter rail and public transit. Local employers benefit from having a low cost tax free benefit they can offer employees. Large companies who must meet air quality mandates can take advantage of programs that help them fulfill their requirements. Commuters can receive incentives to try ridesharing - everything from carpools and vanpools, to taking Metrolink or riding the bus. There are extensive services that support these programs from ride -matching services, to detailed information on carpool lanes, Park and Ride lots leased by RCTC, and preferred parking at Metrolink stations for those who share the ride to the train. Improving Air Qualify through Cleaner Fuels The Environmental Protection Agency provides a designation to air basins nationwide. This designation is a legal status (e.g. "attainment" or "non -attainment") relating to 6 18 " " " whether an area violates a national ambient air quality standard or contributes to a nearby violation. The designation process plays an important role in letting the public know whether air quality in a given area is healthy.3 There are three Air Basins in Riverside County: South Coast, Salton Sea, and Mojave Desert. All of these Air Basins are designated as "non -attainment" areas for 8-hour ozone and PM10. South Coast Air Basin is also "non -attainment" for PM2.5. In addition, the South Coast has the highest maximum concentration of ozone & PM2.5 in the nation.4 Ozone can trigger a variety of health problems including chest pain, coughing, throat irritation, and congestion. PM10 emissions cause adverse respiratory health effects. NOX emissions cause smog. CO emissions are a byproduct of highway vehicle exhaust. VOC emissions cause air pollution. With the exception of ozone, these air pollutants are usually emitted from transportation sources, namely driving. SunLine is known as a leader in the industry for alternative technology fuels. In 1994, SunLine had the nation's first fleet to convert overnight to 100% Clean Natural Gas (CNG). Today, among all bus operators throughout the County, 212 buses operate on CNG. Metrolink uses General Motors low -pollution locomotives. They are 40% cleaner than typical passenger engines and produce over 3,000 horsepower. In 2007, over 1.4 million one-way vehicle trips were reduced through participants in the Rideshare Program. The actions of these participants result in over 343 tons of pollutants removed from the air we breathe. Trends Affecting Transportation Population Explosion Population, employment & households in Riverside County are forecast to grow dramatically in the next 15 years. Riverside County is one of the fastest growing counties in the United States, with a forecast to add almost 1 million more people by 2020, for a total population of almost 3 million. Such rapid growth requires large investments in transportation infrastructure. Riverside County's freeway and roadway networks are nearing build -out, in terms of available right-of-way. There are many constraints to physical expansion of these facilities, such as environmental impacts, lack of right-of-way, lack of funding, and community concerns with major widening projects. With travel demand continuing to grow, we must employ multiple strategies to improve our networks and relieve congestion at specific locations. This will improve air quality, make streets more efficient and keep them maintained so that Riverside County residents, workers, and visitors experience a safe, smooth, and minimally congested commute to their destination. Our transit system serves both short and long distance travelers, with a network of local bus routes, express bus routes, specialized transit, and commuter rail service. Demand ' http://www.epa.gov/ozonedesignations � State of the Region 2006, SCAG, pgs 101, 104, & 107 19 7 for local bus service has increased over the past 20 years and a new component of the fixed route service, known as bus rapid transit (BRT), is being developed. BRT combines the flexibility of a busy system with some of the features that are typical of light rail transit, such as signal priority and fewer stops. Metrolink commuter rail ridership has also grown every year since service began in 1993. In fact, the Metrolink 91 Line is one of the most productive in the regional Metrolink system. Expansion of Metrolink service within Riverside County, including CommuterLink feeder service, is a critical component of the Transit Vision. RCTC is also exploring its role in various high-speed rail and Maglev proposals that would connect Riverside County with surrounding counties and regions. There are several trends that will affect the demand for transit in the future. Most significant are the anticipated increases in population and employment (43 percent and 58 percent respectively). This growth will drive demand for increased transit services: It is noteworthy that the number of Riverside County residents 65 years and older is projected to nearly double between 2005 and 2030. While this segment of our population is not necessarily frail and transit -dependent as a whole, it is likely that many 65 and older residents will require greater, specialized transit. Emergence of Paratransit Needs Curb -to -curb paratransit service (Dial -A -Ride) is provided for people unable to use the fixed -route bus service due to a disability. RCTC anticipates that demand for paratrensit type services will increase substantially over the next 25 years, partially due to the needs of our growing senior population. Unfortunately, the operating costs for Dial -a -Ride services are the highest in the industry. Rising costs coupled with a growing target market are threats to sustainability of this type of service. Quality of Life Issues: Congestion & Air Quality Over 1/3rd of the air pollutants we breathe in are from transportation sources. The rapidly worsening traffic congestion poses ongoing air quality challenges and health threats to the public — particularly to children, the elderly, and other at -risk groups.5 In 2005, workers in Riverside County continued to have the highest average travel time to work in the region, almost 32 minutes, while Imperial had the lowest at 19 minutes. The State average is 27 minutes and the national average is 25 minutes. Highway congestion causes delays affecting personal mobility & goods movement & results in increased economic & social costs. The number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) indicates the overall level of highway & automobile usage, & is directly related to mobile source emissions s 5 Resolving Regional Challenges Fact Sheet "Traffic Congestion & Air Quality", Spring 2007, SCAG 6 Stale of the Region 2006. SCAG, pg 86 8 20 " " " Energy Efficiency Energy use in California is primarily fossil -fuel based (i.e. petroleum, natural gas & coal). Reliance on fossil fuels contributes significantly to global warming. The combustion of fossil fuels to release their energy creates carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the most significant greenhouse gas that affects global climate change. The transportation sector is the largest user of fossil fuels at 39 percent, followed by the industrial sector at 24 percent. The passage of AB32 by the State Legislature mandates a reduction in GHG. 'Riverside County's transit and rideshare programs will contribute to meeting this mandate. Cleaner fuels continue to be a focus among Riverside County transit operators. The day when hydrogen will be a major fuel source for America's vehicles moved another step closer on November 2, 2006, with the official opening at SunLine headquarters of the nation's first large-scale hydrogen facility in the United States using commercialized technology available for third -party refueling purposes. Also add SunLine is testing Zero Emission Vehicles. Growth in Information Technology Riverside County has one of the longest commute times at 101 minutes. Generally, the commute time home is longer than the commute to work. Longer commutes with more commuters in the information age demands an increase in information technology as a tool for both the transit operators and the Rideshare Program. Tools that enable commuters with quick access to travel information, notification of the next bus and train, as well as a universal fare pass, are critical in remaining relevant to today's commuter. The Roadmap - Laying Out the Plan for Future Services The Vision Plan focuses on identifying transportation improvements through 2019 that will help put together the pieces of our mobility puzzle. They incorporate plans adopted by the individual transit operators, including the Comprehensive Operational Assessments (COA) of RTA and SunLine as well as the Metrolink Strategic Assessment. The following goals are designed to layer different transportation services onto one another to create a connected grid of transportation options that allow you to move throughout the county. BUS TRANSIT Improve Quality of Local Bus Service. Local bus providers and RCTC work together to provide efficient service coordination, and to introduce new technology that will make travel more convenient, such as smart cards that allow seamless transfers. The Universal Fare System will eliminate the need for cash, passes, and tokens on RTA and SunLine buses, municipal buses, and Metrolink. It will improve revenue and ridership data collection and reporting through a central data collection system that will help with financial control and service planning. Examples of proposed routes are below: * Enhanced Local Services include: " Banning, Beaumont, & Corona (expanded hours on fixed route) " PVVTA (expanded hours on fixed route) 21 9 " SunLine (expanded hours & Frequency) * Special & Market Based include: " Banning, Beaumont, Corona, & Riverside Special Services (ADA expanded hours) " PVVTA (ADA expanded hours) " SunLine (community -based & market -based services in the COA) Increase Express Bus Service. Express Bus Service will increase countywide by 2019. Routes include within the County and extemal to the County. Examples of proposed routes are below: * RTA Commuter Link Service Peak period express bus service in advance of new commuter rail service, adjusted to become express bus service to rail stations as new commuter rail service is implemented " East Corridor Commuter Link Service " 1-215 Condor between Temecula & Riverside " Service between Hemet & Riverside " SR60 Corridor between Banning & Riverside o West Corridor Commuter Link Service " 1-15 Corridor between Temecula & Riverside " Service between Riverside & the Montclair Transit Center " Service between Murrieta & the Oceanside Transit Center * SunLine Transit Agency Express Bus Service Peak period express bus service in the 1-10 Corridor o Service between Indio & Palm Springs o Service between Palm Springs & Pass Transit Introduce Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). As part of a continuous effort to explore transportation alternatives for passengers that use the bus system, a new component of the fixed route bus service, known as BRT, is being introduced. BRT combines the flexibility of a bus system with some of the features that are typical of light rail transit, such as transit signal priority (extends green lights several seconds to allow BRT vehicles to pass through the ,intersection), queue jump lanes (give BRT vehicles a separate lane at intersections that allows them to enter the intersection prior to regular through traffic), and dedicated mid -block lanes for BRT service. BRT proposals are underway at both RTA and SunLine to provide passengers with improved travel time and better connectivity for easier and more convenient access to the bus system and other modes. Examples of proposed routes are below: * RTA BRT Limited Service " 10-minute service frequency " Magnolia Avenue/e Street " Riverside/Moreno Valley " I-15 Corridor * SunLine Transit Agency BRT Limited Service " Hwy 111 between Indio & Palm Springs SPECIALIZED TRANSIT Improve Choices for Seniors and the Disabled while Reducing Dial -A -Ride Costs. Many informal community -based programs have been developed throughout the County 10 22 " to address the needs of seniors and adults with disabilities. These programs add to the traditional transportation services, which often do not meet the needs of its users. These programs provide door-to-door and door -through -door assistance. The TRIP program is one example of this. TRIP is recognized nationally as one of the special services in Riverside County that complements public transportation by reimbursing volunteers to transport individuals where no transit service exists or when the individual is too frail, ill, or unable to use public transportation for other reasons. * Specialized Transit includes: " Mobility Management Program  develop a program utilizing public transit operators, non-profit and for -profit operators to improve the mobility of senior, disabled and truly - needy populations. " Implement Coordinated Transportation Plan with goal of leveraging Measure "A" to reduce the rising Dial -a -Ride costs by transit operators partnering with community -based programs. COMMUTER RAIL Expand Metrolink Service. Measure " A" created the Commuter Rail Program in Riverside County with the goal of providing long distance passenger rail service to Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Commuters will benefit from new trains that expand and improve service within the County. The Perris Valley Line (Downtown Riverside to Perris to relieve congestion on the Interstate 215) and an extension to either San Jacinto or Temecula is planned during the next 10 years. To improve efficiency and reduce travel time, parking expansion will also take place at the Metrolink Stations. COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Expand the Countywide Carpool Lane System. RCTC plans to add carpoollanes by 2019, along Interstate 15 and State Route 91. Additional carpool lanes help promote Rideshare Programs such as vanpools. They also help make express bus routes more viable. Improve Traffic Flow Through. System Management. Information and technology, such as real-time management of our roadway system, will play larger roles in getting the most out of our system. Freeway Detection Programs and the implementation traveler information systems such as 511 are planned during this period. Other programs like the Freeway Service Patrol will expand to bring traffic incident relief to more freeways and support freeway construction projects. Encourage Alternatives to Driving Alone. Providing options to travelers is one way to reduce traffic congestion. Programs that encourage ridesharing, pedestrian travel, and move toward development of a Class I bicycle system will be promoted. RCTC will also expand its park -and -ride facilities. Examples of proposed programs are below: * Commuter Assistance Program includes: " Employer Services �% Commuter Mode -Shift Incentives " Leased Park N Ride Lots 23 11 " Regional Rideshare Program " Toll Road Incentives " Freeway Detection & Integration " Vanpool Program ALL MODES & PROGRAMS Implement Mechanisms to Link Growth with Transportation Centers and Facilities. Provide meaningful incentives to better link land use and transportation planning. Examples of proposed facilities are below: * Transit Centers " RTA has identified the following Transit Centers: " Corona, Hemet, Moreno Valley, Perris, Riverside and Temecula " SunLine has identified the following Transit Centers: " Coachella * Corporate Yard Improvements - Countywide * CNG Fueling Stations - Countywide * Bus Stop Amenities & Shelters - Countywide * Commuter Rail Stations " Downtown Riverside, La Sierra, Pedley, West Corona, North Main Corona, SprucelPalmyrita, University of Califomia Riverside, Fair Isle Drive, Moreno Valley/March Field, Ramona, Downtown Perris, South Perris, Winchester, Hemet, Sun City, Temecula. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction. The condition of the environment has a significant impact on the quality of life that can be offered to Riverside County's residents, workers, and visitors. The following strategies help to ensure that environmental conditions within the County will not only be maintained, but see an overall improvement: " Use intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) to increase the efficiency of existing facilities; " Continue to expand transit options; " Support the growth of the regional bikeway system and pedestrian walkways; " Continue to comply with federal, state, and local regulations. Current Riverside County Transit/Rideshare Annual Net Reduction in GHG (pounds) C. ��t R. 3L . t Commuter Assistance Pr.. ram Rideshare/Bus Total GHG Emission Reduction 32,380,139 33,701,795 66,081,934 Source: Ray Gorski (8/21/07) and SCRRA (428/08) The passage of AB32 provides an opportunity to market public transit and rideshare programs to an expanded audience  one that seeks ways to be more energy efficient. Increased ridership on all modes coupled with fuel efficient engines/locomotives will generate at least a 20% additional reduction in GHG over the next 10 years. 12 " 24 " The Transit Vision Roadmap links to the trends/challenges identified over the next 10 years in the following manner: l able 3 Roadmap Initiatwes : Bus Transit Population Explosion Trends/Challenges Paratransit Needs Quality of Life Issues Energy Efficiency information Technology Improve Quality of Local Bus Service " " " " " Increase Express Bus Service " " " " Introduce Bus Rapid Transit " " " " Specialized Transit Improve Choices for Seniors & Disabled while Reducing Rising Dial -A -Ride Costs " " " " " Commuter Rail Expand Metrolink Service " " " " " Commuter Assistance Program Expand the Carpool Lane System " " " Improve Traffic Flow Through IT " . " Promote Alternatives to Driving Alone " " " " All Modes and Programs Link Growth w/Transp. Centers/Facilities " " Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction " " " " Delivering the Goods - the Financial Proposition The way that transportation projects and services are funded in the new century is evolving. For many years, state and federal taxes on gasoline were the main source of funds for regional transportation projects. Unfortunately, state and federal gas taxes have not kept up with the costs of building new freeway lanes, roadways, or transit projects. Inflation has eroded this traditional source of transportation funds. At the same time, the number of miles traveled each year by vehicles in California, the Southern California region, and Riverside County has increased as households own more cars and drive further to work and recreational areas. This trend is expected to continue in the future as the distance between major job centers and residential areas grow. This is compounded by more people and more jobs moving into the region. While traditional revenues are declining, the need for new transportation projects continues, and maintenance needs increase because of increased wear and tear on the existing transportation system. In total, $2.6 Billion is needed to fund .this Plan's transportation priorities through 2019. The following table summarizes the proposed level of investment for major transportation programs over the next 10 years. These include the costs of operating the current system and funding new transportation solutions. The types of costs by geographic area at a glance are the following: 25 13 Table 4 Estimated Costs . Total Cost % of Total Roadmap Initiatives • Bus Transit Improve Quality of Local Bus Service Coachella Valley = $276.9 M' Palo Verde Valley = $15.4 M . Western Riverside County = $690.0 M $982.3 M 38,4°!0 Increase Express Bus Service Introduce Bus Rapid Transit Coachella Valley = $231.8 M Palo Verde Valley = $3.6 M Western Riverside County = $128.8 M $364.2 M 14.2% Specialized Transit (Westem Riverside County Only) Improve Choices for Seniors & Disabled while Reducing Rising Dial -A -Ride Costs $35.0 M 1.4% Commuter Rail (Western Riverside County Only) Existing Metrolink Service $771.4 M 30.2% Expand Metrolink Service $316.3 M 12.4% . Commuter Assistance Program (western Riverside county Only) Expand the Carpool Lane System Improve Traffic Flow Through IT Promote Alternatives to Driving Alone $28.6 M 1.1 % All Modes and Programs Link Growth with Transportation Centers/Facilities Coachella Valley = $17.5 M Palo Verde Valley = $2.6 M Westem Riverside County = $39.0 M $59.1 M 2.3% TOTALS $2,556.9 M 100.0% ncludes costs for Specialized Transit in Coachella Valley Financial Resources Transportation revenues come from various federal, state, and local sources. Approximately $1,659.5 million is estimated to be available over the next 10 years to maintain and expand our transit and rideshare system. Much of this funding is generated from % gas tax, Transportation Development Act Funds at $741.7 million. Also, locally generated is $194 million through the one half -cent voter initiative, Measure "A". This and other local sources of revenue such as passenger fares, advertising revenue, and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees account for $457 million — over 38% percent of our total available funding. The remaining 62% percent of transportation funds includes $264 million of federal and $741.7 million in State transportation funds. 14 26 " Table 5 Subregions - Coachella Valley Federal .Estirriated TUMF Revenue TDA Sources* (2009-2019) Measure A , TOTALS Bus Transit $33.0 M N/A $159 M $64 M $259 M Specialized Transit $3.0 M N/A Commuter Rail N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Commuter Assistance Program N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Subtotal Coachella Valley $36.0 M N/A $159 M $64 M $259 M Palo Verde Valley Bus Transit Discretionary only N/A $11.5 M N/A $11.5 M' Specialized Transit Commuter Rail N/A N/A Commuter Assistance Program N/A. N/A Subtotal Palo Verde Valley N/A N/A $8._7 M N/A.. . , $11.5 M Western Riverside County Bus Transit $137.0 M $30 M $448 M $17 M $670 M Specialized Transit $10.0 M N/A $28 M Commuter Rail $81.0 M N/A $126 M $68 M $275 M Commuter Assistance Program Discretionary N/A N/A $17 M 17 M on) Subtotal Western Riverside County ND TOTALS $228 M $30 M $574 M $130 M $962 M Riverside County** $264 M $30M $741.7 M $194 M $1,232.5 M Net f o$427 M inFarebox Revenues ($78 M Coachella Valley, $1.8 M Palo Verde Valley, & $348 M Western Riverside County) **Estimates do not include discretionary funds (i.e. New Starts/Small Starts, STIP, CMAQ, STP, and other discretionary state and federal funds) Local solutions through Measure A Recognizing the uncertainty of state and federal funds, many counties across California, including Riverside County asked voters to approve local sales taxes with specific purpose of funding transportation projects and services. Many such measures passed and have become a significant source of funds for roadway, highway, and transit projects, allowing local residents to better control their own transportation destiny. Measure "A" allocates all sales tax revenues to specific Riverside County transportation improvement projects in three major areas -freeways, roadways, and transit. The Measure specifically identifies by apportionment area and purpose: Coachella Valley  Bus Transit. Since the only transit operator in Coachella Valley is SunLine, it is assumed that these funds are distributed to this agency. Western Riverside County  Commuter Assistance Program. Measure "A" created this program and it is administered by RCTC and is presumed to continue to be administered by RCTC. Western Riverside County  Specialized Transit. These funds are administered by RCTC and made available to all Western Riverside County transit operators and non- 15 27 profit, community -based organizations to address transportation needs of Seniors and the disabled. Western Riverside County — Commuter Express Bus. Newly included in the 2009 Measure "A", these funds are available to support express buses that 'connect to Metrolink Stations in Riverside County. These supplemental funds will be distributed to the transit operators who provide these services. Note: Measure "A" does not specify funds for transit in Palo Verde Valley. Table 6 Recommended Coachella Valley Measure A (2009-2019) Palo Verde WRC TOTALS Roadmap Initiatives Bus Transit Improve Quality of Local Bus Service $63 M N/A N/A $80 M Increase Express Bus Service N/A $17 M Introduce Bus Rapid Transit N/A Specialized Transit Improve Choices for Seniors & Disabled while Reducing Rising Dial -A -Ride Costs * (included in above) N/A $28 M $28 M Commuter Rail Expand Metrolink Service N/A N/A $68 M $68 M Commuter Assistance Program Expand the Carpool Lane System N/A N/A $17 M $17 M "' Improve Traffic Flow Through IT N/A N/A Promote Alternatives to Driving Alone N/A N/A All Modes and Programs Link Growth wfTransp. Ctrs & Facilities N/A N/A N/A N/A Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction * (included in above) N/A * (included in above) Measure A (2009-2019) Ord. TOTALS $63 M N/A $130 M $193 M Table 7 :Roadmap Initiatives Bus Transit Cost -Effectiveness (2009-2019). Ridership Passenger Miles (PM) Improve Quality of Local Bus Service Coachella Valley = 46.9 M Palo Verde Valley = 0.9 M Westem Riverside County = 113.6 M 217.7 M 1.0 B Increase Express Bus Service Introduce Bus Rapid Transit Coachella Valley = 36.9 M Palo Verde Valley = 0.2 M Western Riverside County = 27.5 M 64.6 M 475.6 M Specialized Transit (Western Riverside County Only) Improve Choices for Seniors & Disabled while Reducing Rising Dial -A -Ride Costs 58.3 M 233.3 M Commuter Rail (Western Riverside county only) Existing Metrolink Service Expand Metrolink Service 62.5 M 2.0 B 16 28 " " 10.5 M 81.8 M Commuter Assistance Program (western Riverside county only) Expand the Carpool Lane System Improve Traffic Flow Through IT Promote Alternatives to Driving Alone , 17,6 M 468.2 M All Modes and Programs Link Growth with Transportation Centers/Facilities These stats are included in categories above. 9 TOTALS 431.2 M 4,258.9 M Measuring the Benefits With the Transit Vision, RCTC charts a course for mobility for the next 10 years, and establish milestones that allow us to measure progress and refine strategies along the way. Use of public transit and rideshare helps to improve congestion and air quality and decrease energy consumption. Performance Metric: Improve Mobility Every resident, worker, and visitor needs the ability to travel an integrated and seamless Riverside County transportation network safely and with minimal congestion. Mobility is the ultimate purpose of Riverside County's transportation system and Measure "A". Improving mobility is the cornerstone of the Vision Plan, and its primary goal. Objectives " Offer safe and reliable choices " Provide an accessible transportation network " Minimize congestion " Develop an integrated transportation network We accomplish the goal and objectives by: " Investing in many modes, such as buses and vans, BRT, commuter rail, and bikeways " Making transit more efficient, by transitioning high ridership bus lines to BRT, or limited stop service, and using express buses on the carpool lane network; " Expanding Metrolink to provide a fast, reliable transit backbone within Riverside County " Informing people of available services and their respective travel time reliability using new technology; and " Continuing integrated transportation solutions, such as coordinating CommuterLink and Metrolink schedules, universal fare system, and expanding transit centers that serve multiple modes of transportation. How do we measure progress? If we can maintain or reduce the average time it takes someone to get to their destination  whether traveling by automobile or transit  then we are making progress. For automobiles, travel time is typically measured by freeway peak speeds, non - freeway travel speeds, and average trip length. In certain instances, the funding source 29 17 mandates specific measurements such as a farebox recovery ratio of 20 percent. All transit programs will continue to be analyzed using the Commission adopted Productivity Improvement Program in order to measure cost-effectiveness and productivity. In addition, the Commuter Assistance Program has established key performance indicators to measure performance. Performance Metric: Protect our transportation resources Riverside County residents have invested in building transportation systems. Protecting our transportation resources by maintaining this system, and finding cost effective solutions to improve its efficiency, is a key goal of the Vision Plan. Objectives • Use the existing transportation network efficiently • Maintain our infrastructure • Promote cost effective and multi -modal solutions • Explore creative solutions We accomplish this goal and objectives by: • Expanding Metrolink service within Riverside County; • Supporting continued state funding for freeway maintenance; • Funding/supporting projects that incorporate innovative technology and integrate between modes; • Ensuring that we get our fair share of state and federal dollars for transportation; and • To the extent possible pursue private sector funding and public/private partnerships in order to better supplement and leverage state and federal transportation dollars. How do we measure progress? Growth of projects that maximize and maintain the existing system will be evidence of progress in protecting our resources, such as expansion of signal synchronization and adequate maintenance for optimal operation along major .travel routes, or added Metrolink services on Riverside County's three rail lines. Additionally, we will see local dollars designated for pavement maintenance and new local funds to match state and federal dollars. Performance Metric: Enhance the quality of life Not only is mobility integral to quality of life, but the actions of improving mobility have a ripple effect on issues such as job creation, better goods movement, and community enhancement. Therefore, enhancing the quality of life in Riverside County is an important goal of the Vision Plan. Objectives • Promote coordinated transportation and land use planning • Minimize community impacts • Support economic growth 18 30 " " " Protect the environment by reducing greenhouse gas emissions We accomplish this goal and objectives by: " Working together with key stakeholders such as the public, cities, the County of Riverside, state and federal agencies, transportation partners, planning organizations, and special interest groups; " Mitigating project impacts where possible; " Supporting transportation enhancements such as landscaping. Critical Success Factors Successful implementation of the Transit Vision relies on the Commission and the eight transit operators in Riverside County. Implementation of the COA's for both RTA and SunLine are also key. Major barriers to further transit system development & higher transit use include an auto -oriented urban structure, inadequate level of service & a lack of geographic coverage (or insufficient destinations).' A significant issue that challenges increased transit use is the coordination of land use and transit. Some developments make it difficult for transit operators to design effective service leaving potential passengers with little choice but to use an automobile for access to goods and services. Other developments are designed in a way that transit can serve easily, providing effective transportation for a variety of populations and destinations. Considering transit accessibility when making land use decisions can improve the transportation alternatives available to people and increase transit ridership. Initiatives that can be undertaken to increase the coordination between transit and land use include: �% Initiate cooperative creation of model zoning and local ordinances to facilitate transit oriented development and land use; �% Promote inclusion of transit agencies in land use planning from development of master plans to site plan review; �% Partner local communities with transit operators to make investment choices and policy decisions which encourage, support, and integrate transit services with development, improve access, and thereby increase the use of transit. Conclusion By implementing the Vision Plan, RCTC achieves the five fundamental goals: increasing coordination with the transit and rideshare community, removing barriers to transit use, provide efficient and effective transit and rideshare service, ensure adequate funding, and promote energy efficiency. The projects and services in the Vision Plan offer residents and workers safe and reliable transportation choices, and greater accessibility because of increased service and improved system -wide efficiency. The Transit Vision also includes considerable investment in maintaining our transportation networks. 7 State of the Region 2006, SCAG, page 93 31 19 Public transit and rideshare will continue to play a vital role in meeting the mobility challenges of Riverside County citizens. Initiatives included in the Transit Vision will complement RCTC's overall 10-year Delivery Plan for Measure °A". Collectively, the projects in the Transit Vision will minimize increases in congestion and travel time. The goal is to promote mobility and economic growth while minimizing community and environmental impacts. As the elements of the Transit Vision become reality, each project- whether a new bus line, rail car, coordinated signal, carpool lane, or pavement repair project — will contribute to our quality of life and help make Riverside County a great place to live, work, and visit. 20 32 Transit Vision Transit Po/icy Committee May 22, 2008 Today's Agenda ■ Transit Vision Elements ■ Transit Vision Goals ■ Trends/Challenges Ahead ■ Roadmap ■ Expected Outcome by 2019 ■ Funding Sources ■ FundingRecommendation ■ Next Steps Transit Vision Elements ■ Fixed Route Transit ■ Commuter Rail &Intercity Express Bus ■ General Public Dial -A -Ride ■ Specialized Transit & Paratransit ■ Commuter Assistance Program ■ Environment &Transit Supportive Land Use Transit Vision Goals ■ Increase Coordination ■ Remove Barriers to Transit Use ■ Efficient & Effective Service ■ Adequate Funding ■ Energy Efficiency Trends/Challenges Ahead ■ Population Explosion ■ Emergence of Paratransit Needs ■ Quality of Life Issues ■ Congestion &Air Quality ■ Climate Change Mandate ■ Information Technology Growth The Roadmap (Future Svcs) 10-Yr Initiative Trends/Challenges Bus Transit Pop. T DAR Needs Quality of Life GHG IT T Improve Local Quality Bus Service of • • • • • Increase Express Bus Service • • • • Introduce Bus Rapid • • • • Transit The Roadmap (Future Svcs 10-Yr Initiative Estimated Costs (in $M) Bus Improve Local Transit Quality Bus Service of CV PV WRC Total $277 $15 $690 $982 Increase Bus Bus Service Rapid Express Transit &Introduce $232 $4 $129 $364 Totals $509 $19 $819 $1,347 The Roadmap (Future Svcs) 10-Yr Initiative Trends/Challenges Specialized Transit Pop. 'I` DAR Needs Quality of Life GHG IT T Improve Choices Seniors & Persons while Reducing Costs Disabled Dial for -A -Ride The Roadmap (Future Svcs 10-Yr Initiative Estimated Costs (in $M) Specialized CV Transit PV WRC Totals Improve Seniors Persons Costs Choices &Disabled while Reducing Dial for -A -Ride $45 $45 *Costs are included in "Bus Transit" category The Roadmap (Future Svcs 10-Yr Initiative Trends/Challenges Commuter Rail Pop. T DAR Needs Quality of Life GHG IT T Expand Service Metrolink • • • • • The Roadmap (Future Svcs 10-Yr Initiative Costs (in $M) Estimated Commuter Rail CV PV WRC Totals Existing Metrolink Service N/A N/A $771 $771 Expand Service Metrolink N/A N/A $316 $316 Totals NIA N/A $1,087 $1,087 The Roadmap (Future Svcs 10-Yr Initiative Trends/Challenges Commuter Assistance Pop. T DAR Needs Quality of Life GHG IT T Expand Lane System the Carpool • • • • Improve through Traffic IT Flow • • • • Promote Alternatives • • • • • to Driving Alone Estimated Costs total $29 M The Roadmap (Future Svcs 10-Yr Initiative Trends/Challenges All Modes & Programs Pop. t DAR Needs Quality of Life GHG IT T Link Transit Facilities Growth Centers/ w/ • GHG Reduction • • • The Roadmap (Future Svcs 10-Yr Initiative Costs (in $M) Estimated Link Transit Facilities All Modes Programs Growth Centers/ & w/ CV PV WRC Totals $18 $3 $39 $59 Expected Outcome by 201 ■ J/ Costs of ADA trips by 30% ■ Is Local & Regional Service by 30% ■ is Rideshare Participation by 30% ■ t Cost -Effectiveness by 30% ■ is Productivity of Services by 40% ■ 4/ GHG Emissions by at least 20`)/0 Funding Sources V d4,4 n+ �,... 10-Yr Initiatives Federal State TUMF Measure «A» Bus Transit • • N/A • Specialized Transit • • N/A • Commuter Rail • • N/A • Commuter Assistance • N/A N/A • Transit-Ctr-/F_acilities • • •* N/A * Available to RTA only Funding Recommendation n 1 r - _ e "r �,e� „-e TDA Public Bus Operators CV PV WRC 100% 100%* 78% Commuter Rail N/A N/A 22% Totals 100% 100% 100% * Portion may fund local streets & roads based upon unmet transit need determination. Formula remains unchanged. Funding Recommendation; Measure "A" (WRC only) Rideshare Specialized Transit Commuter Rail & Intercity Bus Public Bus N/A 25% 25% Non Public -Profit/ Bus N/A 75% N/A Commuter Rail N/A N/A 75% Rideshare 100% N/A N/A Note: Measure "A" in CV goes to Sunline; Transit funds are not designated for PV. Funding Recommendation` Specialized Transit ■ RTA is the Designated CTSA ■ 20% Allows for Greater Efficiency & Coordination Among the Public Transit Operators &the Non -Profit Agencies ■ 80% Non -Profits &Public Bus Eligible ■ Supports the Coordinated Plan Funding Recommendation ■ Commuter Rail &Intercity Bus Service ■ Commuter Rail = 75% for current &future Service ■ Public Bus = 25% for intercity express bus service that feeds Metrolink service. ■ Continue Metrolink Passengers Ride Free through Reimbursement by SCRRA/RCTC Call to Action ■ Need vs. Available Funds ■ Advance Planning ■ RTA ACCESS Feasiblity Study ■ Increase Competitiveness for Discretionary Funding Sources Specialized Call for Projects Transit Released May 2008 Commission of Transit Vision Adoption June 11, 2008 Deadline Projects for Call for June 16, 2008 " AGENDA ITEM 8 " RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: May 22, 2008 TO: Transit Policy Committee FROM: Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Programs Director THROUGH: John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Western Riverside County Measure A Specialized Transit Interim Funding STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve up to $433,481 of additional Western Riverside County Measure A Specialized Transit funds to the approved grantees identified in Attachment 1 contingent upon grantee submittal of the Commission's Universal Specialized Transit application by June 16, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to extend the applicable grantee contracts through September 30, 2008; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its May and September 2006 meetings, the Commission approved 14 funding requests in response to its Western Riverside County Measure A Specialized Transportation Program Call for Projects for FY 2006-08 as identified below: • Beaumont Adult School (Agreement No. 06-26-051-00) • Blindness Support Services (Agreement No. 07-26-023-00) • Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County (Agreement No. 06-26-052-00) • Care -A -Van Transit, Inc (Agreement No. 06-26-053-00) • Care Connexxus, Inc (Agreement No. 07-26-073-00) • CASA (Agreement No. 07-26-072-00) • City of Norco (Agreement No. 06-26-059-00) • Friends of Moreno Valley (Agreement No. 06-26-054-00) • Independent Living Partnership (Agreement No. 06-26-057-00) • Inland AIDS Project (Agreement No. 06-26-055-00) • Operation Safe House, Inc. (Agreement No. 06-26-056-00) • Riverside County Regional Medical Center (Agreement No. 06-26-058-00) Agenda Item 8 33 " Volunteer Center of Riverside County (Agreement No. 07-26-021-00) " Whiteside Manor, Inc (Agreement. No. 07-26-024-00) Since the award, two new federal specialized transit funding programs have become available in Riverside County: SAFETEA-LU Jobs Access Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom. The JARC provides funding for the development and maintenance of job access projects to transport welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals to and from work during non -peak hours as well as supply reverse commute options for workers in suburban areas. The New Freedom program provides funding for new public transportation services and alternatives for people with disabilities beyond what is required by the Americans with Disabilities Act . In accordance with the provisions of Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), recipients under these programs must comply with all federal coordinated planning requirements to be eligible for funds. The reauthorization stipulates that projects selected for funding under these programs must be derived from a locally coordinated, public transit -human services transportation plan. At its April 2008 meeting, the Commission approved the Riverside County Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan). Approval of the Coordinated Plan allows for the development and release of a call for projects. To streamline the application process, staff created a universal application for the JARC, New Freedom and Measure A program. The $8.4 million call for projects was released last week and applications are due to the Commission by June 16, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. Interim Funding Requests Currently, the 14 funding requests and related agreements approved in 2006 are scheduled to expire on June 30, 2008. Because the applications are due on June 16, 2008, the Commission will not have an opportunity to complete the evaluation of proposals prior to. June 30, 2008. Therefore, staff is recommending a conditional interim funding allocation for one quarter in order to ensure that services can continue without disruption. The condition of the allocation relates directly to the submittal of the Commission's Universal Specialized Transit application by June 16, 2008. Therefore, if a current Measure A grantee does not submit by the deadline, then its current contract would not receive the interim funding allocation and would expire on June 30, 2008 consistent with the current term of its contract. Agenda Item 8 34 " The interim funding allocation amount is $433 481, which reflects the total amount allocated in the last quarter (April -June 2008). The total is delineated in the attachment and is included in the FY 2008/09 Budget. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2008/09 Amount: $443,481 Source of Funds: Measure A Specialized Transit Budget Ad ustment: No GLA No.: 225 26 86101 $443,481 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \14.44c444,y4 Date: 05/16/08 Attachment: Measure A Specialized Transit FY 2007/08 Approved Funding Agenda Item 8 35 " " MEASURE A SPECIALIZED TRANSIT FY 07/08 APPROVED FUNDING ATT PROJECTS RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING: FY 07/08 ALLOCATION BY QUARTER Applicant FY 2007/08 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 iatr4 `, Total Beaumont Adult School Agreement No: 06-26-051-00 20,814 5,204 5,204 5,203.._,._i - _j,.; 5,203! 20,814 Blindness Support Services Agreement No. 07-26-023-00 75,114 18,779 18,779 18,778 1$;7761 75,114 Boys and Girls Clubs of Southwest County Agreement No. 06-26-052-00 74,896 18,724 18,724 18,724 187244 74,896 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. Agreement No. 06-26-053-00 245,025 71,382 57,881 57,881 5T 88"I' 245,025 Care Conne>ocus, Inc. Agreement No. 07-26-073-00 175,000 43,750 43,750 43,750 _ > ,43;750 175,000 CASA Agreement No. 07-26-072-00 30,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 7;50Q' 30,000 City of Norco Agreement No. 06-26-059-00 73,116 18,279 18,279 18,279 - 16,279 73,116 Friends of Moreno Valley Agreement No. 06-26-054-00 47,773 11,944 11,943 11,943 11,943 47,773 Inland AIDS Project Agreement No. 06-26-055-00 100,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000! 100,000 Operation SafeHouse, Inc. Agreement No. 06-26-056-00 5,000 5,000 5,000 Independent Living Partnership Agreement No.06-26-057-00 416,598 104,150 104,150 104,149 1:,104;10 416,598 Riverside County Regional Medical Center Agreement No. 06-26-058-00 274,665 68,667 68,666 68,666 ; 6$;666 274,665 Volunteer Center of Riverside County Agreement No. 07-26-021-00 192,353 48,089 48,088 48,088 =s48,088 192,353 Whiteside Manor, Inc. Agreement No. 07-26-024-00 22,082 5,521 5,521 5,520 5 $20! 22,082 TOTAL 1,752,436 451,989 433,485 433,481 3,40 1,752,436 Dept. of Mental Health Note: FY 07/08 Meas A amount for Care -A -Van include capital cost of $13,500 ENT 1 " AGENDA ITEM 9 " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: May 22, 2008 TO: Transit Policy Committee FROM: Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Council Fina Clemente, Staff Analyst THROUGH: Stephanie Wiggins, Regional Program Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Years 2008/09 - FY 2010/11 Short Range Transit Plans CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE/SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Review and approve, in concept, the FY 2008/09 - FY 2010/11 Short Range Transit Plans for the cities of Banning, Corona, Riverside, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA), Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine), and the Commission's Regional Commuter Rail Program, as presented; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Riverside County FY 2008/09 - FY 2010/11 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTP) cover the three apportionment areas of the county and are comprised of plans for the municipal operators, the Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency, the Riverside Transit Agency, SunLine Transit Agency, and the Commission's Regional Commuter Rail Program. Staff is requesting that the SRTPs be approved in concept only, as requests for financial allocations will be made at the July Commission meeting and the Productivity Improvement Plan (PIP) calculations are not complete. ' The Commission oversees transit service in Riverside County primarily through the approval of SRTPs, which detail the operating and capital costs that are planned for transit services. The SRTPs provide detailed information about existing services and facilities, financial forecasts and plans, as well as planned and proposed improvements to be implemented in FY 2008/09. Each operator adopts such a plan and then provides data to the Commission on performance. The SRTPs were developed to meet the Commission's PIP which was adopted as part of a comprehensive effort to work with the county's eight public transit Agenda Item 9 37 operators to provide better service and improve efficiency. Under state law, the Commission is tasked with the responsibility to identify, analyze, and recommend potential productivity improvements for transit operators. The process requires the transit operators to address recommendations that are made by regular performance audits. The performance indicators that are evaluated through the PIP include operating costs per revenue hour, fare box recovery ratio, subsidies, passengers per revenue hour, and passengers per revenue mile, which are critical in ensuring that service can be maximized in an efficient manner. While reviewing and analyzing individual route productivity will remain with the transit operators and their governing boards, the Commission has a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that transit operators are utilizing Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds efficiently and effectively. The Commission implemented TransTrack, a transit performance manager software application and training package which assists staff in compiling, tabulating, and reporting transit operating information for use in the SRTP preparation. TransTrack software assists the Commission's policy board in complying with the PIP requirements of the Public Utilities Code (PUC) and state -mandated requirements to effectively use TDA funds. PIP calculations will be analyzed and reported with the requests for financial allocations. A summary of each operator's proposed plan is provided below: City of Banning The city of Banning (Banning) works closely with the city of Beaumont (Beaumont) to provide a seamless transit system serving the residents of Banning, -Beaumont, the unincorporated areas of Cabazon and Cherry Valley as well as the commercial area of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians Reservation. Banning Transit provides both dial -a -ride and fixed route services. Highlights of planned services for FY 2008/09 include the following: • No changes in service or service hours will occur in FY 2008/09 but minor schedule changes will be made to improve frequency, eliminate duplication and improve service coverage; • Banning Transit will focus on improved capital assets neededfor transit. operations and will close out all outstanding capital projects from prior fiscal years; • Develop a comprehensive marketing program to promote ridership growth; • New Transit Operations Procedure Manual will be developed and a detailed bus stop inventory on all Pass Transit routes operating in Banning and Cabazon will be conducted; Agenda Item 9 38 " Staff will evaluate potential fare changes for FY 2008/09 to ensure 10% farebox ratio compliance; and " Banning will continue coordination with Beaumont to study the feasibility of a single transit agency. City of Corona The city of Corona (Corona) operates a general public dial -a -ride program and operates two fixed routes known as the "Corona Cruiser." Corona closely coordinates all transfers with both RTA and the Commission's Commuter Rail services. Highlights of planned services for FY 2008/09 include the following: " Corona will continue its Transition outreach training program to increase public awareness of the convenience of the fixed route bus systemas compared to DAR service; Tie existing Automatic Vehicle Locator (AVL)/Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) transit technology into the city's Traffic Management Center(TMC) for real- time tracking of buses on -screen with the ability to monitor traffic; " The city plans to promote the "Gateway Pass" using an innovative payment method similar to smart card technology; Implement prioritized marketing strategies to attract new riders; and " Possible re -alignment of Corona Cruiser routes to better serve the needs of current users. City of Riverside  Special Services Riverside Special Services (RSS) operates a 24-hour advance reservation dial -a -ride for seniors and persons with disabilities within the Riverside city limits. The special services program functions as an alternative to RTA's fixed route system for seniors and persons with disabilities unable to use fixed route service. All services operated by RSS are closely coordinated with RTA. Highlights of planned services for FY 2008/09 include the following: " RSS plans to market the Special Transit Program through new advertising mediums including television. Tickets and punch cards will be sold online by the end of FY 2008/09; " During the year, eight new dial -a -ride vehicles will be received as part of the bus replacement program; " RSS will install mobile data computers (MDC) in all its vehicles to allow data collection in real time; and Agenda Item 9 39 " RSS plans to expand service solely to transport dialysis patients pending application for Section 5310 vehicles. Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency PVVTA provides a multitude of services including fixed route, dial -a -ride, and a transportation reimbursement program for individuals who cannot ride the public bus system. The fixed route can deviate up to % of a mile away from the actual fixed route. Service is provided within the city of Blythe (Blythe) and surrounding unincorporated county areas in the Palo Verde Valley. Highlights of planned services for FY 2008/09 include the following: " Transit service continues to be provided by contract with Transportation Concepts; " Proposing fare increase on both Dial -A -Ride and fixed route in FY 2008/09; " A new fixed route known as Green Route 4 Ripley Rider will be implemented; " PVVTA will start construction of its new Transit Facility; " Passenger amenities (benches, shelters, trash receptacles) will continue to be installed at strategic locations; " Agency will actively continue to pursue additional funding for a Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fueling station, in partnership with Blythe and county of Riverside; and " With the construction of a CNG fueling station, the agency will start to purchase CNG vehicles. Riverside Transit Agency RTA is the Consolidated Transportation Service Agency for Western Riverside County and is responsible for coordinating transit services throughout the approximately 2,500 square mile service area, providing driver training and assistance with grant applications: RTA provides local, intercity and regional transportation services. Highlights of planned services for FY 2008/09 include the following: " RTA projects a ridership increase of over 3% in FY 2008/09, particularly in the areas of express routes; " Route changes in FY 2008/09 will be modest with the exception of the addition of a new Harveston trolley service; " Operating budget reflects an 11.4% increase (excluding the GASB pre -fund); and " Capital budget of $7,725,784 has been identified. Agenda Item 9 40 " " SunLine Transit Agency SunLine is the Consolidated Transportation Service Agency and is responsible for coordinating transit services in the Coachella Valley. SunLine's service area consists of approximately 1,120 square miles and provides both local and regional transportation services with 12 fixed routes and demand response dial -a -ride services known as SunDial. Highlights of planned services for FY 2008/09 include the following: " Service improvements will be implemented as a result of the agency's completed Comprehensive Operational Analysis; " Acquire 13 replacements and expansion vehicles and 10 support vehicles; " Continue installing more transit amenities throughout the service area and continue working with local jurisdictions on bus stop issues; " Evaluate feasibility of rehabilitating facility at Indio; " Continue work on environmental assessment, preliminary and final engineering for new administrative building; and " Examine the feasibility of conducting a site selection study to select potential locations throughout the valley for a transit center, transfer locations and sites for park -and -ride lots. Regional Commuter Rail The Southern California Regional Rail Authority operates seven commuter rail lines with 39 locomotives and 155 commuter rail cars. Three routes, the Riverside to Los Angeles Line, the Inland Empire to Orange County (IEOC) Line, and the Riverside to Los Angeles via Fullerton Line (91 Line) directly serve Western Riverside County with connecting service available to destinations on the other four lines. Highlights of planned services for FY 2008/09 include the following: " Implementation of the revised fare structure with an average 5.5% fare " increase in FY 2008/09; " Preliminary engineering and final design of the Perris Valley Line (Riverside  Moreno Valley  Perris) Metrolink extension project; " Facilities to accommodate new equipment and expansion of service; " A 3% increase in RCTC's operating subsidy due to an updated cost allocation formula that more evenly distributes the costs among member agencies; " Improved FY 2008/09 operating revenue hours forecast to more accurately account for previously added services and adjust for potential train delays. Agenda Item 9 41 City of Beaumont Due to staffing changes at Beaumont, the SRTP has not been submitted. Upon submittal by Beaumont, staff will review and provide a recommendation to the Commission. Attachments: Short Range Transit Plans 1) City of Banning 2) City of Corona 3) City of Riverside 4) Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 5) Riverside Transit Agency 6) SunLine Transit Agency 7) Commuter Rail Program Agenda Item 9 • 42