HomeMy Public PortalAbout03 March 09, 2009 Technical Advisory Committee"
T I M E :
D A T E :
L O C A T I O N :
T E C H N I C A L A D V I S O R Y C O M M I T
S P E C I A L M E E T I N G A G E N D A *
1 0 : 0 0 A . M .
M a r c h 9 , 2 0 0 9
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C e n t e r
4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , R i v e r s i d e , C A
C o n f e r e n c e R o o m A , 3 ` d F l o o r
C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s
7 3 - 7 1 0 F r e d W a r i n g D r i v e , S u i t e 2 0 0
P a l m D e s e r t , C A
V i a T e l e c o n f e r e n c e
R e c o r d s
8 6 6 3 7
* B y r e q u e s t , a g e n d a a n d m i n u t e s m a y b e a v a i l a b l e i n a l t e r n a t i v e f o r m a t ; i . e . l a r g e p r i n t , t a p e .
C O M M I T T E E M E M B E R S
D a v e B a r a k i a n , C i t y o f P a l m S p r i n g s
B i l l B a y n e , C i t y o f C a t h e d r a l C i t y
T o m B o y d , C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
D u a n e B u r k , C i t y o f B a n n i n g
R o n C a r r , C i t y o f P e r r i s
K i p F i e l d , C i t y o f C o r o n a
M i k e G o w , C i t y o f H e m e t
M a r k G r e e n w o o d , C i t y o f P a l m D e s e r t
P a t r i c k N a l l y , C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t 8
B r u c e H a r r y , C i t y o f R a n c h o M i r a g e
J o n a t h a n H o y , C i t y o f D e s e r t H o t S p r i n g s
B i l l H u g h e s , C i t y o f T e m e c u l a
T i m J o n a s s o n , C i t y o f L a Q u i n t a
M i c h a e l K a s h i w a g i , C i t y o f W i l d o m a r
E u n i c e L o v i , S u n L i n e T r a n s i t
H a b i b M o t l a g h , C i t i e s o f C a n y o n L a k e & S a n J a c i n t o
"
L e s N e l s o n , P V V T A
J u a n P e r e z , C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
K i s h e n P r a t h i v a d i , C i t y o f B e a u m o n t
J i m R o d k e y , C i t y o f B l y t h e
K e n S e u m a l o , C i t y o f L a k e E l s i n o r e
J i m S m i t h , C i t y o f I n d i o
M a r k S t a n l e y , R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y
R u t h a n n e T a y l o r B e r g e r , W R C O G
P a t r i c k T h o m a s , C i t y o f M u r r i e t a
B i l l T h o m p s o n , C i t y o f N o r c o
P a u l T o o r , C i t y o f C o a c h e l l a
C h r i s V o g t , C i t y o f M o r e n o V a l l e y
A l l y n W a g g l e , C V A G
T i m W a s s i l , C i t y o f I n d i a n W e l l s
C a r l o s Z a m a n o , C i t y o f C a l i m e s a
C o m m i s s i o n S t a f f
A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m m i n g a n d P l a n n i n g M a n a g e r
1 1 . 3 6 . 0 2
"
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N
C O M M I S S I O N
T E C H N I C A L A D V I S O R Y C O M M I T T E E
S P E C I A L M E E T I N G A G E N D A *
* A c t i o n s m a y b e t a k e n o n a n y i t e m l i s t e d o n t h e a g e n d a .
T I M E : 1 0 : 0 0 A . M .
D A T E : M a r c h 9 , 2 0 0 9
L O C A T I O N : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C e n t e r
4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , R i v e r s i d e , C A
C o n f e r e n c e R o o m A , 3 ' ( F l o o r
C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s
7 3 - 7 1 0 F r e d W a r i n g D r i v e , S u i t e 2 0 0
P a l m D e s e r t , C A
V i a T e l e c o n f e r e n c e
I n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e A m e r i c a n s w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s A c t a n d g o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 5 4 9 5 4 . 2 , i f y o u
n e e d s p e c i a l a s s i s t a n c e t o p a r t i c i p a t e I n a C o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g , p l e a s e c o n t a c t R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n a t ( 9 5 1 ) 7 8 7 - 7 1 4 1 . N o t i f i c a t i o n o f a t l e a s t 4 8 h o u r s p r i o r t o m e e t i n g t i m e w i l l
a s s i s t s t a f f i n a s s u r i n g t h a t r e a s o n a b l e a r r a n g e m e n t s c a n b e m a d e t o p r o v i d e a c c e s s i b i l i t y a t t h e m e e t i n g .
1 . C A L L T O O R D E R
2 . S E L F - I N T R O D U C T I O N S
3 . P U B L I C C O M M E N T S ( T h i s i s f o r c o m m e n t s o n i t e m s n o t l i s t e d o n a g e n d a .
C o m m e n t s r e l a t i n g t o a n i t e m o n t h e a g e n d a w i l l b e t a k e n w h e n t h e i t e m i s
b e f o r e t h e C o m m i t t e e . )
4 . D R A F T R C T C E C O N O M I C S T I M U L U S P R O P O S A L F O R A M E N D M E N T R E C O V E R Y
A N D R E I N V E S T M E N T A C T ( A R R A ) H I G H W A Y F U N D S ( A t t a c h m e n t )
5 . A D J O U R N M E N T ( T h e n e x t m e e t i n g w i l l b e M a r c h 1 6 , 2 0 0 9 , 1 0 : 0 0 A . M . , i n
R i v e r s i d e . )
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
M a r c h 9 , 2 0 0 9
T O :
T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m m i n g a n d P l a n n i n g M a n a g e r
T H R O U G H :
A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
A m e r i c a n R e c o v e r y a n d R e i n v e s t m e n t A c t ( A R R A ) R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h a t t h e T A C a p p r o v e s t a f f s p r o p o s a l f o r A R R A h i g h w a y f u n d i n g i n c l u d e d i n A t t a c h m e n t A .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
A s t h e R e g i o n a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n n i n g A g e n c y ( R T P A ) , R C T C i s d e s i g n a t e d a s t h e a g e n c y
a u t h o r i z e d t o m a k e p r o g r a m m i n g d e c i s i o n s f o r s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l f u n d s , w h i c h i n c l u d e s t h e
A m e r i c a n R e c o v e r y a n d R e i n v e s t m e n t A c t ( A R R A ) ( f o r m e r l y r e f e r e n c e d a s " E c o n o m i c
S t i m u l u s " ) h i g h w a y f u n d s .
I t i s y e t t o b e d e t e r m i n e d h o w t h e f u n d s w i l l b e d i s t r i b u t e d a t t h e S t a t e l e v e l . L e g i s l a t i o n h a s
b e e n p r o p o s e d t o d i s t r i b u t e t h e A R R A f u n d s t h r o u g h t h e S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m
( S T P ) f o r m u l a . i f t h e l e g i s l a t i o n p a s s e s , s t a f f e s t i m a t e s t h a t R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y w i l l r e c e i v e
a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 7 1 m i l l i o n . I f t h e l e g i s l a t i o n i s n o t p a s s e d , t h e S t a t e w o u l d d i s t r i b u t e t h e
f u n d s p e r t h e e x i s t i n g f o r m u l a f o r f e d e r a l f u n d i n g a n d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y w o u l d r e c e i v e
a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 3 5 m i l l i o n .
T h e T A C S u b c o m m i t t e e m e t t h i s m o m i n g t o r e v i e w s t a f f s A R R A h i g h w a y f u n d i n g p r o p o s a l .
T w o s c e n a r i o s w e r e p r e s e n t e d t h a t i l l u s t r a t e s t h e f u n d i n g r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s u n d e r a $ 7 1
m i l l i o n A R R A f u n d i n g l e v e l a n d a t a $ 3 5 m i l l i o n l e v e l . T h e p r o p o s a l w a s s u p p o r t e d b y t h e
T A C s u b c o m m i t t e e a l t h o u g h a f o r m a l a p p r o v a l w a s n o t r e q u e s t e d a s t h e i t e m w i l l b e a n
a c t i o n i t e m a t t h e M a r c h 9 S p e c i a l T A C m e e t i n g . S u b c o m m i t t e e a t t e n d e e s w e r e : P a t t y
R o m o ( C o u n t y ) , R u s s N a p i e r ( M u r r i e t a ) , G r e g B u t l e r ( T e m e c u l a ) , H a b i b M o t l a g h ( P e r r i s , S a n
J a c i n t o , C a n y o n L a k e ) , P r e m K u m a r a n d C h r i s V o g t ( M o r e n o V a l l e y ) , M a r c u s F u l l e r ( P a l m
S p r i n g s ) , a n d T o m B o y d ( R i v e r s i d e ) . L a r r y P a r r i s h ( C V A G ) a t t e n d e d v i a t e l e c o n f e r e n c e .
O v e r t h e p a s t f e w m o n t h s , R C T C s t a f f h a s r e v i e w e d v a r i o u s p r o j e c t s t h a t m e e t f e d e r a l
r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r A R R A f u n d s . T h e a t t a c h m e n t l i s t s t h e c r i t e r i a a n d g o a l s t h a t w e r e
c o n s i d e r e d f o r A R R A f u n d i n g . T o s u m m a r i z e , R C T C i s p r o p o s i n g 5 i n t e r c h a n g e p r o j e c t s f o r
A R R A h i g h w a y f u n d s . I n a d d i t i o n , R C T C i s p r o p o s i n g $ 1 8 m i l l i o n o f l o c a l M e a s u r e A f u n d s t o
b e d i s t r i b u t e d t o t h e c i t i e s a n d c o u n t y p e r t h e M e a s u r e A L o c a l S t r e e t s a n d R o a d s s u b v e n t i o n
f o r m u l a ( a l s o i n c l u d e d i n a t t a c h m e n t ) .
W e w i l l d i s c u s s t h e p r o p o s a l a n d w i l l r e q u e s t a p p r o v a l f r o m t h e T A C a t t h e M a r c h 9 m e e t i n g .
T h e p r o p o s a l w i l l t h e n b e p r e s e n t e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n o n M a r c h 1 1 f o r f i n a l a p p r o v a l .
" "
D R A F T R C T C E c o n o m i c S t i m u l u s P r o p o s a l f o r
A m e r i c a n R e c o v e r y a n d R e i n v e s t m e n t A c t ( A R R A ) H i g h w a y F u n d s
F e d e r a l C r i t e r i a
" F e d e r a l i z e d P r o j e c t s
" 5 0 % o f f u n d s a l l o c a t e d t o S t a t e s m u s t b e o b l i g a t e d i n 1 2 0 d a y s
S t a t e A l l o c a t i o n o f A R R A f u n d s
" U n d e r e x i s t i n g S t a t e f o r m u l a f o r d i s t r i b u t i o n o f f e d e r a l f u n d s
- R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y w o u l d r e c e i v e a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 3 5 m i l l i o n
" P r o p o s a l t o a l l o c a t e A R R A f u n d s t h r o u g h f e d e r a l S T P f o r m u l a
- L e g i s l a t i o n n e e d e d ( c u r r e n t l y i n d r a f t f o r m , n e e d a u t h o r )
- R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y w o u l d r e c e i v e a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 7 1 m i l l i o n
R C T C G o a l s
" O b l i g a t e C o n s t r u c t i o n / M a x i m i z e J o b C r e a t i o n w i t h i n 1 2 0 d a y s
" R e g i o n a l , F e d e r a l P r o j e c t s ( a p p r o v e d N E P A )
" M a i n t a i n e x i s t i n g c o m m i t m e n t s i n c l u d i n g :
- S T I P / P r o p 1 B F u n d e d P r o j e c t s
- M e a s u r e A H i g h w a y / R e g i o n a l P r o j e c t s
" R e p r o g r a m S T I P c a p a c i t y t o o t h e r r e g i o n a l p r o j e c t s
" M i n i m i z e i m p a c t o n C a l t r a n s
" M i n i m i z e a m o u n t o f p r o j e c t s t o r e p o r t t o F H W A / C a l t r a n s
" I f $ 7 1 M A R R A l e v e l , P r o v i d e L o c a l S t i m u l u s ( $ 1 8 m i l l i o n l o c a l f u n d s , d i s t r i b u t e t o c i t i e s / c o u n t y )
P r o p o s e d P r o i e c t s f o r A R R A H i g h w a y F u n d i n g ( N E P A c l e a r e d ) :
D e s c r i p t i o n
* A R R A $ 7 1 M
$ ( 0 0 0 ' s )
* * A R R A $ 3 5 M
$ ( 0 0 0 ' s )
O b l i g a t i o n
S u b m i t t a l
C o m m e n t s
I - 2 1 5 / C l i n t o n K e i t h I C
$ 1 0 , 0 0 0
$ 1 0 , 0 0 0
M a r c h 3 0
R e p l a c i n g M e a s A R e g i o n a l
1 - 1 0 / P a l m D r I C
$ 5 , 0 8 0
- - -
A p r i l 1 5
R e p l a c i n g d e l a y e d S T I P
S R 6 0 N a l l e y W a y I C
$ 4 , 9 8 2
$ 4 , 9 8 2
A p r i l 1 5
R e p l a c i n g P r o p 1 B
S R 9 1 N a n B u r e n I C
$ 1 6 , 1 0 1
- - -
A p r i l 1 5 "
R e p l a c i n g d e l a y e d S T I P
I - 1 0 / B o b H o p e I C
$ 3 4 , 9 1 2
$ 2 0 , 0 0 0
M a 1
R e . l a c i n " d e l a e d S T I P
T o t a l
$ 7 1 , 0 7 5
$ 3 4 , 9 8 2
A s s u m e s S t a t e l e g i s l a t i o n i s p a s s e d a l l o w i n g A R R A f u n d s t o b e d i s t r i b u t e d d i r e c t l y t o r e g i o n s .
* * A s s u m e s A R R A f u n d s a r e d i s t r i b u t e d p e r e x i s t i n g f o r m u l a ( p r o p o s e d l e g i s l a t i o n i s n o t p a s s e d ) .
" " "
B a c k U p P l a n
I f 5 0 % o b l i g a t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t i s i n j e o p a r d y , a r e v i e w o f r e p r o g r a m m i n g o p t i o n s w o u l d i n c l u d e :
1 ) R e a l l o c a t e A R R A f u n d i n g o n t h e s e l e c t e d i n t e r c h a n g e s a n d o b l i g a t e a d d i t i o n a l f u n d s o n t h e i n t e r c h a n g e ( s )
t h a t a r e r e a d y f o r o b l i g a t i o n
2 ) R e v i e w a l l f e d e r a l i z e d p r o j e c t s t h a t a r e r e a d y t o g o o r m a y n e e d a d d i t i o n a l f u n d s d u e t o c h a n g e o r d e r s o r
h i g h e r b i d s
3 ) T r a d e w i t h n e i g h b o r i n g c o u n t i e s ( w i t h i n S C A G r e g i o n )
T E A R R A F u n d s
W e c u r r e n t l y d o n o t k n o w i f t h e T E f u n d s w i l l b e h a n d l e d t h r o u g h t h e S t a t e o r s u b a l l o c a t e d t o t h e r e g i o n s .
" I f S t a t e s e l e c t s T E p r o j e c t s :
C T C / C a l t r a n s m a y p r o p o s e t o a l l o c a t e T E A R R A f u n d s t o p r o j e c t s o n t h e s t a t e h i g h w a y s y s t e m a n d / o r
d e f e r r e d T E p r o j e c t s o n o r o f f / s y s t e m .
" I f R e g i o n s ( R C T C ) s e l e c t T E p r o j e c t s :
R C T C e s t i m a t e s t h e T E A R R A a m o u n t w i l l b e a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 2 . 5 m i l l i o n . R C T C w i l l s e l e c t p r o j e c t s t h a t h a v e
b e e n a p p r o v e d f o r S T I P T E f u n d s . H i g h e s t p r i o r i t y w i l l b e t o T E p r o j e c t s d e f e r r e d b y t h e C T C .
$ 1 8 M i l l i o n . L o c a l S t i m u l u s i f $ 7 1 m i l l i o n A R R A f u n d i n g l e v e l
" $ 1 8 m i l l i o n M e a s u r e A f u n d s w o u l d c o m e f r o m 7 4 / 2 1 5 I C .
" $ 1 8 m i l l i o n o f S T I P f u n d s o r o t h e r f u n d s w o u l d r e p l a c e $ 1 8 m i l l i o n o f M e a s u r e A o n 7 4 / 2 1 5 I C .
" L o c a l S t i m u l u s F u n d s m u s t b e u s e d o n p r o j e c t s i n M e a s u r e A C I P .
" L o c a l S t i m u l u s F u n d s m u s t b e u s e d f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s t h a t c a n b e a w a r d e d w i t h i n o n e y e a r .
DRAFT
•
•
FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Measure A Distribution related to Economic Stimulus Trades
MEASURE A PROJECTION $18,000,000
LESS: ADMINISTRATION 0
TOTAL PROJECTION $18,000,000
Local Streets
& Roads
100.00%
WESTERN COUNTY PORTION $13,549,000 $13,549,000
BANNING $219,000
BEAUMONT 243,000
CAUMESA 56,000
CANYON LAKE 72,000
CORONA 1,532,000
HEMET 632,000
LAKE ELSINORE 437,000
MENIFEE 488,000
MORENO VALLEY 1,376,000
MURRIETA 823,000
NORCO 260,000
PERRIS 437,000
RIVERSIDE 2,684,000
SAN JACINTO 255,000
TEMECULA 1,077,000
WILDOMAR 210,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY " "''2,748,000
AREA TOTAL
$13,549,000
Local Streets
& Roads
100.00%
COACHELLA VALLEY PORTION $4,314,000 $4,314,000
CATHEDRAL CITY 5492,000
COACHELLA 201,000
DESERT HOT SPRINGS 137,000
INDIAN WELLS 81,000
INDIO 550,000
LA QUINTA 0
PALM SPRINGS 599,000
PALM DESERT 881,000
RANCHO MIRAGE 312,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 581,000
CVAG 480,000
AREA TOTAL $4,314,000
PALO VERDE VALLEY PORTION
Local Streets
100.00%
$137,000 $137,000
BLYTHE 3126,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AREA TOTAL $137,000
Yotal COuniy:'�l," ;$3'239;000;
NOTE (1): Allocations are based on Measure A allocation formula for local streets and roads program
NOTE (2): Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences
CADOCUME—thwrebXLLOCALS—IllempUWIPP Ase Meawne A PIM&
DRAFT
FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONL Y
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Measure A Distribution related to Economic Stimulus Trades
MEASURE A PROJECTION
LESS: ADMINISTRATION
TOTAL PROJECTION
$18,000,000
0
$18,000,000
Local Streets
& Roads
100.00%
WESTERN COUNTY PORTION $13,549,000 $13,549,000
BANNING $219,000
BEAUMONT 243,000
CALIMESA 56,000
CANYON LAKE 72,000
CORONA 1,532,000
HEMET 632,000
LAKE ELSINORE 437,000
MENIFEE 488,000
MORENO VALLEY 1,376,000
MURRIETA 823,000
NORCO 260,000
PERRIS
437,000
RIVERSIDE 2,684,000
SAN JACINTO 255,000
TEMECULA 1,077,000
WILDOMAR 210,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY v44000
AREA TOTAL $13,549,000
Local Streets
& Roads
100.00%
COACHELLA VALLEY PORTION $4,314,000 $4,314,000
CATHEDRAL CITY $492,000
COACHELLA 201,000
DESERT HOT SPRINGS 137,000
INDIAN WELLS 81,000
INDIO 550,000
LA QUINTA 480,000
PALM SPRINGS 599,000
PALM DESERT 881,000
RANCHO MIRAGE 312,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 8140r00
AREA TOTAL
$4,314,000
CVAG
0
PALO VERDE VALLEY PORTION
Local Streets
100.00%
$137,000 $137,000
BLYTHE $126,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ,11,000
AREA TOTAL $137,000
NOTE (1): Allocations are based on Measure A allocation formula for local streets and roads program
NOTE (2): Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences
03/6 V c3 9
CADOCUME-11medinallOCALS-1\Temp1XPgrpwiselMeasure A Dlsnels
Funds for Highway Infrastructure Investment Pursuant to the
Amedcan Recover and Reinvestment Act of 2009
2,569,568 Apportionment to CaMomla (thousands)
STP 3096 770,870
TE 3% 77,087
SHOPPISTIP 87% 1,721,611
SHOPP/STP 1,721,611 1,721,611 1,721,611
less SHOPP S00,000 700,000 900,000
STIP (non TE) 1221,611 1,021,811 821,611
Regions 918,208 766,269 616,208
Caltrans 305,403 255,403 205,403
Regions RSTP 770,870 770;870 770,870
STIP 916,208 766,208 616,208
TS(STIP) 57,815 57,815 57,815
Total, Regions 1,744,894 1,594,894 1,444,894
Percent, Regions 67.9% 62.1% 58.2%
Caltrans
Total, Calbans
Percent, Caltrans
SHOPP 500,090 700,000 900,000
STIP 305,403 255,403 205,403
TE (STIP) 19,272 10,272 19,272
824,674 974,674 1,124,674
32.1% 37.9% 43,8%
Possible ARRA STIP targets
__
Alameda '
Possible Non-TE ARRA Targets (STIP)
_ TE_ SHO_PP SOOM SHOP? 700M SH_OP_P BOOM
_ 2,099 ' 33,264E `---- 27,818 22,372
Alpine
59 9411 7871 633
Amador
138 2,156, 1,8033 1,450
Butte
402 _8681 5,326; 4 283
Calaveras
159 2,5221 2,109E 1,696
Colusa
106 1A6731 1,3991 1,125
Contra Costa
1,380 21,5511 18023 14495
Del Nate
102 1,61�-1347t 10084
El Dorado LTC
257 4,0701 3 403f 2,737�
Fresno
1,455 23054E 19,2791 15,505
Glenn
113 1,7861 1,4951 1,202
Humboldt
_ 408 6i439' %.3851
4,331
Kings
_
2544J506� 3,768!
- 3036
Lake
175 2,773. 2,319 1,865
Lassen
258 40821 3;4141 2745
Madera
258 4083t 34141 72 46
Mann
398 8,299d 5,26g 4,237
Mariposa _
_ 105 1 663: 1 3913,
1 118
Mendocino
� 383r 6.082� 5,07D
4077
Merced
463 7i 7 8,135_
9934
Modoc
_ _
137 ' 2,187 1,812
_4
1458
Monterey
745 11,7981_�_._ 1.8671. 7.935
Napa
___
247 3,9081 3208: 2,628
Nevada
217 3 4451 243..81, 2,317
Placer LTC
408 6 4731 5 413 _ 4 354
�1A6.57
Plumas
155 2�4641 20601
Sacramento --
_
1803 '-- 2856_7r 23890:
J
_ 19213
_f ._....___A.._..
San Benito
_
_.. 1352,137: ts7e7f
. _4F 1 8
'Is437
San Francisco
7,074 17,018E 14,232
_
11J446
San Joa uin
9
_--�
-'"14,953. 12505i 10,057
San Mateo
_944.1_.__._._.._...�_-
1,114 17661, 14770!
____.
11,878
Banta Clara
2,458 389581 32,5601
26,202
Santa Cruz
'
_
..,._..4------- 67
_ 428 _ ._ 6i768` 5,677!-_�'�' 4,588
}r._...._.__.___._.
Shasta
440 6_969f 5628'
4,687
Sierra
73 _-...-_1,1561_ 967!
777
Sisy',,,ou
304 4,814?�W_.__4i0261_��3,237
.....___ ____.._r
q_._....�.._____.
SolaSolana.10,200{
644
__a_
Sonoma
784 T______ 1Q389{ 0,A
Slaiuslaus�--�-----
.___.__-_i-i,ti
737 11,5867 9689T- - -��--�7792
Sutter-��-'"�
165 �---'� 26181----� 21881
760
1,760
Tahoe RPA
.-
108 1y709T 1,429,
1,150
Tehama
3507 2,933•
2,359
_
Tri '
___^!t.K__.___T._
^221
158 2,5021___.______ 2,092:
______.__. __..__._
Tudumne
t79 2,833i 2,3691
_______1_683
1,905
Yolo
_
353 5,589: 4,674e3,759
_
Yuba
128 2,002; 1,674E 1,346
__.__._..____ ________.__5_
Im eclat
in-ip.riai_ __
B80 __ 10 771f 9007E
I o
____
960 8722+ 7294r
Kent
_ _____
1.905 30,196: 25,253[ 20309
Los ngeles A______,
12,851�_-� P03,641._170,305i 135,965
Mono
40B 6464,-
; 5,406; 4_347
Oran_rie _,_____._�
3,876 61 425E 51.3691___�__ 41,312
Riverside
.._________._-______
__,___
2,777 - �"' 44,0071 38,802` 29,597
...._._.______.__._• ___._.1.-_.__._.__.i-
�'
SanBemardino
c.
_ 3609 57,789T 47,628' 38,463
._._.4,24..._______.___{..---______.__.{.__.__.___.._.__
San Die o
a,248 87,319: 56,298r 45,276
San Luis Obis o
758 110,O601 '"� 8,082
Somam Baara
883 1i3,-674i674{ 11,4369,197
Tulare
894 14,172{ 11,852,
953E
Ventura
1,270 20,1231 16 828
13,534
Statewide Regional
57,815 916,208E 766,208
516,205
Inlenegional
19,272 305,403t.______ 255,403t
_ 205,403
Total
77,087 1,221,6115 1,021,611; 821,611
Attachment2.
Tab 18
Item 4.10
California Transportation Commission March 11-12, 2009
Memorandum
To: Chair and Commissioners Date: March 11-12, 2009
From: Andre Boutros, Interim Executive Director File No: Tab 16, Item 4.10
ACTION
Ref: Implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Workshop
Issue
On February 17, 2009 President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 (Act or ARRA). Among its many provision the Act provides for the apportionment of $2.57
billion in federal stimulus funds to California for "Highway Infrastructure Investment" (eligible
projects also include transit, rail, and port infrastructure). The Act specifies suballocation of 30% of
these funds through the Surface Transportation Program (STP), but does not require suballocation of
the remaining 70%. States have 120 days to obligate half of the 70% of the stimulus funds that are
not suballocated, with any unobligated funds being redistributed to other states. In California's case,
this equates to approximately $900 million subject to the 120 day requirement.
Under existing state law, the 70% of the stimulus funds are available for programming and
allocation by the Commission in the State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP)
and the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Amongst the transportation community,
there is strong support for enacting state legislation to distribute all the stimulus funds through a
modified Surface Transportation Program process (62.5% to regions based upon population; 37.5%
to the state). Such legislation would require a 2/3`6 vote in order to take effect immediately.
While staff sees the benefit of a statutory change, particularly in regards to the funds subject to the
120 day deadline, staff believes that both the deadlines in the Act and need for immediate economic
stimulus compel the Commission to proceed along two tracks. Staff recommends that, pending a
change in statute, the Commission proceed to program and allocate the 70% of the stimulus funds
through the SHOPP and the STIP. Rather than commence an entire programming cycle, funds from
the Act can be used to fund construction and construction support for projects already programmed
in the STIP or projects amended into the STIP. When legislation is enacted, the Commission will
work with Caltrans to distribute any unallocated SHOPP and or STIP stimulus funds pursuant to the
legislation.
In order to proceed with the programming and allocation of stimulus funds through the SHOPP and
STIP, staff recommends the following Commission actions:
• In February, the Commission adopted a SHOPP floor of $500 million. Based on Caltrans'
recommendation, staff recommends the Commission adopt a revised initial SHOPP level of
$625 million to be used to calculate STIP targets. Attachment 1 shows STIP targets based on
a SHOPP level of $625 million. Attachment 2 shows STIP targets based on various other
SHOPP levels ($500 million, $700 million, and $900 million).
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Chair and Commissioners
March 11-12, 2009
Page 2
• Following a discussion at this workshop, adopt guidance for incorporating stimulus funds
into the STIP. Key points include:
o Direct all regions and Caltrans to submit, by March 27, 2009, a list of projects
nominated for funding in the STIP with stimulus funds, and to proceed with preparing
the necessary STIP allocation requests and amendments.
o Targets for the Act will not be immediately incorporated into existing share balances.
o Use the funds for construction and construction support for projects already
programmed in the STIP or projects amended into the STIP.
o STIP amendments, if necessary, will be presented to the Commission for approval at
the time an allocation is requested.
o Commission intent that when funds from the Act are used by a region to supplant
Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) funds, that region shall have the
opportunity to program a like amount of CMIA funds in the future. If interregional
shares are used to supplant non-STIP Proposition 1 B fund, then Caltrans shall have
the opportunity to program a like amount of the supplanted funds in the future.
Further Provisions of the Act
The Act indicates that the Federal government shall manage and expend the funds so as to achieve
the following purposes as quickly as possible consistent with prudent management:
1. To preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery.
2. To assist those most impacted by the recession.
3. To provide investments needed to increase economic efficiency by spurring technological
advances in science and health.
4. To invest in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure that will
provide long-term economic benefits.
5. To stabilize State and local government budgets, in order to minimize and avoid reductions
in essential services and counterproductive state and local tax increases.
The Act apportions $26.66 billion to the states, via two formulas, for Highway Infrastructure
Investment. This is defined as projects eligible for funding under the Surface Transportation
Program, passenger and freight rail, and port infrastructure. Projects eligible for funding under the
Surface Transportation Program include construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing,
restoration and operational improvements on highways and bridges, transit capital, and safety
infrastructure improvements.
The Act states that in selecting projects for this portion of the funds, priority shall be given to the
following:
• Projects will be completed within a 3-year time frame (by February 17, 2012).
• Projects that are located in economically distressed areas as defined by section 301 or the
Public Words and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended (Alpine, Amador, Butte,
Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Kern, Kings, Lake,
Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Monterey, Plumas, Riverside, San
Benito, San Bernardino, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Stanislaus, Sutter,
Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, and Yuba counties).
Chair and Commissioners
March 11-12, 2009
Page 3
• Preference shall be given to activities that can be started and completed expeditiously,
including a goal of using at least 50% of the funds for activities that can be initiated not later
than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the Act (June 17, 2009).
• Recipients shall also use grant funds in a manner that maximizes job creation and economic
benefit.
On March 2, 2009 the Federal Highway. Administration apportioned $2,569,568,320 to California.
Under existing state law, the estimated $2.57 billion in federal stimulus funds will be distributed as
follows:
• 30% ($771 million) through the Surface Transportation Program. Surface Transportation
Program funds are suballocated to regions based upon population with nearly 80%going to
urbanized areas with populations greater than 200,000 based upon their relative populations.
• 67% ($1,722 million) to the state without specified federal suballocation. Under state law,
these funds will be available for the SHOPP and the STIP. SHOPP and STIP programming
levels are determined based upon the statutory restrictions of the various funds and through
the Commission's adoption of the Fund Estimate. STIP funds are distributed 75%• to regions
subject to a north/south split (40%/60%) and distributed based upon population (75%) and
state highway miles (25%), and 25% to Caltrans for the interregional program.
• 3% ($77 million) for Transportation Enhancement (TE) activities. Under state law these fund
will flow through the SHOPP and STIP.
The federal stimulus bill includes use -it -or -lose -it provisions. States have 120 days to obligate half
of the funds that are not suballocated, with any unobligated funds being redistributed to other states.
In California's case, this equates to approximately $900 million subject to the 120 day requirement.
One year from the date of apportionment, any unobligated balances will be redistributed. All funds
are to remain available through September 30, 2010.
The Act contains extensive reporting requirements. Recipients of funds from the Act are required to
submit periodic reports on the use of the funds for the covered programs. By March 17, 2009 states
are required to submit data on projects to be funded completely or partially with ARRA funds.
The Act also contains various certification requirements. The Governor must certify by March 19,
2009 that the State will maintain its effort with regard to State funding for the types of projects that
are funded by the Act. Additionally, the Governor must certify by April 3, 2009 that the funds
provided by the Act will be used to create jobs and promote economic health. For funds for
infrastructure investments, the Governor, mayor, or other chief executive, as appropriate, must
certify that the infrastructure investment has received the full review and vetting required by law and
that the chief executive accepts responsibility that the infrastructure investment is an appropriate use
of taxpayer dollars.
Chair and Commissioners
March 11-12, 2009
Page 4
Guidance on Incorporating Stimulus Funds into the STIP
The below guidance address the particular circumstances related to the funding of stimulus projects
in the STIP. Notwithstanding this guidance, project sponsors must comply with all provisions of the
Act.
The Commission intends to use funds from the Act to allocate construction and construction support
for projects already programmed in the STIP or projects that are amended into the STIP.
Targets
The targets provided are the formula distribution of 70% of the funds made available under the Act
for Highway Infrastructure Investment, less the funding level approved for the SHOPP. The STIP
targets for the Act will not be immediately incorporated into existing share balances due to the need
for prompt programming, allocation, obligation, and, most importantly, contract award. The
Commission will incorporate this programming into existing share balances during the 2010 STIP
Fund Estimate scheduled for adoption in August 2009.
The targets are not a minimum, guarantee, or limit on project nominations or on project selection in
any county or region. The Commission may program over the target in some regions and under the
targets in others, however, the sum of the total programmed may not exceed the funding available.
The Commission does not intend to program above the target in a region that is already
overprogrammed except as a last resort to prevent the loss of stimulus funds due to non -obligation.
Project Selection
Consistent with Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) ARRA Implementation Guidance, the
Commission intends to follow the below priorities in programming and allocating ARRA funds.
• Priority will be given to projects that can be delivered expeditiously. Specifically, priority
will be given to projects that can obligated by June 17, 2009.
• Priority will be given to projects that will be completed by February 17, 2012.
• Priority will be given to projects located in economically distressed areas as defined by
section 301 or the Public Words and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended (42
U.S.C. 3161). These are identified by FHWA
(http://hepgis.fhwa.dot.gov/hepgis_v2/generalinfo/Map.aspx) as the following counties:
Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial,
Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Monterey,
Plumas, Riverside, San Benito, San Bernardino, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sierra,
Siskiyou, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, and Yuba.
• Priority will be given to projects that maximize job creation and economic benefit.
If the stimulus funds allocated to a project are not obligated in a timely manner and the inability to
obligate the funds may jeopardize the state's ability to meet the deadlines in the Act, then the
allocation will be rescinded and those funds will be reallocated. This first priority for reallocating
the funds will be the SHOPP. The Commission may allocate more than $625 million in stimulus
funds to the SHOPP to ensure that SHOPP projects are ready to obligate any reallocated funds.
Chair and Commissioners
March 11-12, 2009
Page 5
To the extent practicable, the Commission intends to give priority to TE projects that associated with
a highway or transit project and are not stand alone projects.
List of Nominated Projects
All regions and Caltrans shall submit a list of projects nominated for funding in the STIP with
stimulus funds by March 27, 2009. A template for the list will be posted on the Commission website
no later than March 13, 2009. The list shall be submitted to the Commission electronically in a
Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Califomia Transportation_Commission@dot.ca.gov) and in hard copy
addressed to:
Andre Boutros, Interim Executive Director
Califomia Transportation Commission
Mail Station 52
1120 N Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
For each project, the list should include the following:
a. The name of the agency responsible for project implementation.
b. The project title, which should include a brief nontechnical description of the project
location and limits (community name, street name, etc.), and a phrase describing the
type and scope of the project. By definition, the Commission will regard the limits for
a rehabilitation project on local streets and roads as including adjacent or nearby
streets and roads, thus providing greater flexibility in project scope.
c. A unique project identification number provided by Caltrans (PPNO).
d. For projects on the State highway system, the route.
e. The funding amount requested by component (construction and construction support)
and fiscal -year.
f. The expected date (month) of allocation, contract award, and projects completion.
g. The relative priority of each project on the list.
The list should indicate which projects are already programmed for allocation this year, which are
being nominated for advancement, which nominations are a change to a currently programmed
project (other than an advancement), and which are being nominated for amendment into the STIP.
The list should also indicate which projects are eligible for TE funding.
The Commission understands that, due the unique nature of the stimulus funding, the projects
submitted for programming and allocation by may differ from those on the nomination lists, but the
Commission expects such differences will not be significant.
STIP Amendments
On December 29, 2008 the Commission provided notice that it may amend the STIP on or after
January 28, 2009 to add projects nominated by Caltrans and regional transportation planning
agencies for anticipated federal transportation economic stimulus funding. This notice did not
include specific project information. This notice will be updated based on the aforementioned list
projects nominated.
Chair and Commissioners
March l 1-12, 2009
Page 6
All regional requests for STIP amendments shall be submitted directly to the appropriate Caltrans
district. Caltrans will, in an expedition manner, review proposed amendments and forward them to
the Commission for action. The Commission encourages. Caltrans, in cooperation with regions and
Commission staff, to develop and implement a set of procedures to standardize and streamline the
amendment process.
To help ensure that projects amended into the STIP meet the obligation deadlines in the Act, the
Commission intends that action on a proposed STIP amendment occur at the same meeting as the
allocation of funds for the project.
A STIP amendment is not required to advance into the current -year for allocation a project that is
programmed in a future year. Such action may occur at the time of allocation.
Supplanting Proposition 1B Funds
Because of the state's current inability to meet its Proposition 1B funding commitments, the
Commission anticipates that some funding from the Act will be used to supplant the state's
commitment of Proposition 1B funds. In such instances, the Commission expects the primary source
of funding be funds from the Act that are available to a region. The Commission expects
interregional shares to be used to supplant a commitment of Proposition 1B funds only in
conjunction with the use of regional funds and in cases where the regional funding is insufficient to
supplant the Proposition 1B funds.
It is the intent of the Commission that when funds from the Act are used by a region to supplant
CMIA funds, that region shall have the opportunity to program a like amount of CMIA funds for an
eligible project or projects in the future. If interregional shares are used to supplant non-STIP
Proposition 1B fund, then Caltrans shall have the opportunity to program a like amount of the
supplanted funds for an eligible project or projects in the future. Such requests for Proposition 1B
programming shall be submitted to the Commission no later than three months after the Commission
resumes the allocation of Proposition 1B funds.
Timely Use of Funds
Approximately $900 million of the stimulus funds (50% of the apportioned funds excluding
federally suballocated funds) must be obligated by June 30, 2009 (120 days after the apportionment
of funds, which occurred on March 2). Obligation is the Federal government's promise to pay a
State for the Federal share of a project's eligible cost. This commitment occurs when the Federal
government approves the project and the project agreement is executed, and typically occurs within
two weeks of Commission allocation.
Within one year after the apportionment of funds to California, all funds must be obligated.
Obligated balances are available for expenses incurred until September 30, 2015, at which point any
remaining balances will be cancelled.
The Commission expects that the stimulus funds for a project will be obligated within three weeks of
allocation. Caltrans shall report, at the Commission meeting following allocation, on the projects
that were not obligated within three weeks of allocation. Details of this report my not be available
prior to the Commission meeting because of the limited time Caltrans will have to prepare the report.
Chair and Commissioners
March 11-12, 2009
Page 7
Funds that are not obligated within one month of allocation may be rescinded and reallocated
through the SHOPP or STIP in order ensure that all federal funds are obligated by the dates
required in the Act.
Completion of Environmental Process
Allocations will be made only after a project has achieved environmental clearance. If the
Commission has previously approved the final environmental document, the applicant shall include
with the request for allocation the date of Commission approval and the Commission resolution
number. Otherwise, documentation of the required environmental clearance for the project
(Environmental Impact Report, Negative Declaration, or Notice of Exemption) shall be submitted
with the request for allocation.
Performance Measures.
At the time of allocation, the project sponsor shall provide a brief quantitative and/or qualitative
explanation how the project will further the purposes of the Act:
1. To preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery.
2. To assist those most impacted by the recession.
3. To provide investments needed to increase economic efficiency by spurring technological
advances in science and health.
4. To invest in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure that will
provide long-term economic benefits.
5. To stabilize State and local government budgets, in order to minimize and avoid reductions
in essential services and counterproductive state and local tax increases.
STIP Funds for Highway Infrastructure Investment
American Recover and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Recommended STIP tamets
County
TE
Non -TE
(SHOPP of 625M)
Alameda
2,099
29,860
Alpine
59
845
Amador
136
1,936
Butte
402
5.717
Calaveras
159
2,264
Colusa
106
1,502
Contra Costa
1,360
19,346
Del Norte
102
1446
El Dorado LTC
257
3,653
Fresno ____._.-,_„___. �'
_ 1,455
20,695
Glenn _
113
_� _.........
1,604
Humboldt
406
_5,780
519.254,045
2,489
Lassen
_._.. 3 664
Made7a _�'
_258
_-�___258
_W
_ 3,665
Marin
__398
.�______ __ 5,655.
Mariposa
105_
Mendocino
..�-M
Merced.-_.:.... ___-.-.-_________..__
463_
.». _ ____-._.._.. 6:586..
M6� �__W
Mont_. ___. .....__...____
137
_.___.__._
1,946
_._._.._._.____._.._ _._ ».
Monterey
745»
10,591...
Napa--^�
247
3,508
Nevada
217
3,093
Placer LTC
__.»__._..__.__.____.
Plumas
408
____-� __..
5,811
_...
Sacramento1�803
_..- .._ _..._ _..-.__._._.________
San Benito
_______ _ ._
135
- 25,644
.._.___._.____-. _ ___-
SanFranclsw
1,074
---1,918
15,277
San Joa uin _._---_. �_-
_
_ 944
-�
W_ _._._.___ 15423
San Mateo _
I. _11114
15,854_.
Santa Clara
^-----_-_
Santa Cruz
Shasta
440
6,256
Sierra
73
1,038
Siskin._..._..__
304
Solano
644
_.._4,321
9,156_
Sonoma
784
11,152
Stanislaus
Sutter
._.__..__._._165
,___.._.._.._._.__..1348
Tahoe RPA
108
1,534
Tehama
'NI
Tuolumne
179
2,543
Yolo
Yuba
Imperial__,..-_._..__._.._.._.._.._
680
9,668
In o_..
Kem
1,905
27,106
Los Angeles .._.._..._._.._..._.._.._.._
12,851
182,808
Mono
408
5,803
Oran.ge
3,876
55,140
Riverside
2,777
39,504
San Bemardino.___.._.._.._..._.._.._.._
_.._.._..___31609....__
San Diego,-..-._.._..
4,248
_.51,337
60,431
San Luis Obispo.___...._.._..._..._._._
._..__.._.__.._758
10,788
Santa Barbara
863
12,275
Tulare_.._..._._._.._.»_»_._.._..._._._._.__._.._._
.___._..__._._.894..._......_..._.._.._.._..._..12,722..
Ventura
1,270
18,064
Statewide Regional
57,815
822,458
Interregional
19,272
274,153
Total
77,087
1,096,611
Califomia Transportation Commission
Attachment 1
Stem 16
Tab 4.10
March 11-12, 2009
CITY OF PERR]IS
Office ofthe City Manager
March 6, 2009
Ms. Ann Mayer
Executive Director
RCTC
4080 Lemon, 3`d Floor
Riverside; CA 92502
Dear Ms. Mayer:
101 NORTH "D" STREET
PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570
TEL: (951) 943-5100
It has recently come to the attention of the City of Perris that RCTC is considering
development of a "Local Economic Stimulus" Funding program. This proposal would redirect
$18 Million from old Measure "A" funds away from the SR-74/I-215 Interchange project and
distribute it to the various agencies in the County according to population formula. The SR-
74/1-215 project would then be made "whole" with an $18 Million influx of STIP funds when
and if these funds become available.
Although we do not object to funds distributed to all agencies, we are disappointed with the
funding source. We have been anxious to see the completion of the SR-74/I-215 Interchange
project since the original Measure "A" was passed in 1988. This project is currently funded
entirely with local dollars (50% Measure "A", 50% TUMF). The proposed change will
introduce a new layer of bureaucratic delay possibly due to the need for State authorization and
subsequent reimbursement. Furthermore, you are well aware of the challenges the State is
having with their budget and the delays in STIP or other funding availability.
The City is unwilling to support a budget modification that may cause any delay in this long
awaited project. The Measure "A" Funding for the SR-74/I-215 Interchange project should not
be moved elsewhere, and it is irresponsible for such an action to be under consideration by
RCTC.
Ann Mayer
March 6, 2009
Page Two
We ask for further consideration on RCTC's part prior to finalizing the local stimulus plan, and
we urge the Commission to identify a different source of funds should such a plan be adopted.
Sincerely,
Richard Belmudez
City Manager
cc: RCTC Commissioners
Shirley Medina
John Standiford
J SPECIAL TECHNICA,VISORY COMMITTEE • "" Marc , 2009 AGENCY I TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE r PRINT NAME BANNING DUANE BURK Director of Public Works BEAUMONT IKISHEN PRATHIVADI BLYTHE CVAG CALIMESA CAL TRANS Assistant Director of Public Works JIM RODKEY Public Works Director ~ ALLYN WAGGLE CARLOS ZAMANO City Engineer PATRICK HALLY Off CANYON LAKE I HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer CATHEDRAL CITY BILL BAYNE ~0 COACHELLA I PAUL TOOR Public Works Director CORONA KIP FIELD IKahono Oei I Dee Moorjani Chad Aaby City Engineer Carol Clapper Bob French Public Works Director Pavel Horn Tony Lucero Bob Morin Acting Public Works Director I Principal Civil Engineer DESERT HOT I JONATHAN HOY SPRINGS Public Works Director /City Engineer Carlos -zdlYlq(/io fJATPi I c_fi H/-t l L y \? J LL p.A ... ~ t-1 P('._ 'f3o~ ~--v Jo tJA:-~ r\-o'f SIGNATURE ~ ~~~_, 3/4/2009
I SPECIAL TECHNICA,VISORY COMMITTEE · ., Marc , 2009 • AGENCY I TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE PRINT NAME SIGNATURE HEMET MIKE GOW Victor Monz M'\kGovJ /l{<JITi) Principal Engineer INDIAN WELLS TIM WASSIL Bondie Baker Public Works Director/City Assistant Engineer II Engineer INDIO JIM SMITH Tom Rafferty Director of Public Works Principal Civil Engineer crtiM. J'M n H +c,L--LA QUINTA TIMOTHY JONASSON Nick Nickerson Public Works Director/City ~~ Engineer LAKE KEN SEUMALO Ed Basubas ELSINORE City Engineer City Traffic Engineer KEAi 5tu#LA io tL£~ MORENO CHRIS VOGT Prem Kumar :? ' VALLEY Public Works Director/City Deputy Public Works D \( ....,L !V\j'\ ((._ Engineer Director/Assistant City \~~~ f:C~ Engineer ~: MURRIETA PATRICK THOMAS Russ Napier p.1~~ Director of Public Works/City Capital Improvement "Ytt!-~t itw, Engineer Program Manager "\)"' NORCO BILL THOMPSON Lori Askew " Director of Public Works Associate Engineer PALM DESERT MARK GREENWOOD Alana Townsend Director of Public works -A PALM SPRINGS DAVE BARAKIAN Marcus Fuller JJ4l· Director of Public Works/City -Engineer 7 PVVTA LES NELSON City Manager 31412009
I SPECIAL TECHNICA'.VISORY COMMITTEE • • ' Mar .. 2009 AGENCY I TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE PRINT NAME SIGNATURE PERRIS RTA RANCHO MIRAGE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RON CARR Public Works Director MARK STANLEY Director of Planning BRUCE HARRY Director of Public Works TOM BOYD Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer JUAN PEREZ Director of Transportation SAN JACINTO I HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer SUN LINE TEMECULA EUNICE LOVI Director of Planning Habib Motlagh City Engineer Scott Richardson Planning and Program Manager Randy Viegas Project Manager Siobhan Foster Patty Romo Deputy Director of Transportation Eric Skaugset Assistant Engineer Alfonso Hernandez Assistant Planner Pc:..~ '-(o<t.1 ·r~ ( \ --~-~::? ~-Director of Public Works Public Works Department (; \ T'-f " "1 Gi ~ \;l.-12.. ~~-0-WILDOMAR I MICHAEL KASHIWAGI I Diane Nguyen Director of Public Works Transportation Programs Manager WR COG i-~(.{15 RUTHANNE TAYLOR· BERGER Deputy Executive Director t:: __,...-._. ~'~ t:.A."::>~'-"~\ D~~ De-... .J \J, -. ' ,-::-... "V·"' '" -r 10.~~l'-J ~ 1-V'\~ V?-\ tC;;..A.A. c,t' ~ ~Le.) ··,J·c:...._;;; • Ju~~ c# P~~~ 15v-4----3/4/2009
.. I SPECIAL TECHNICAL.VISORY COMMITTEE • · Marc~ 2009 AGENCY NAME I TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL I '/<c::--rc_ r:; r-a ce: ilha..rP ~ 9J/-77rf' "/09J---~CA·~ \;\..._,\~ ~\2\)~CU\A~ qs·1 . r t>:t . 1 \ 4 1 I 3/4/2009
"
N A M E
" - - -
A T T E N D A N C E R O S T E R
T A C S U B C O M M I T T E E M E E T I N G
T h u r s d a y , M a r c h 5 , 2 0 0 9
R E P R E S E N T I N G T E L E P H O N E O R E - M A I L