Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout06 June 28, 2010 Budget & Implementation89506 RECORDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA TIME: 9:30 a.m. DATE: Monday, June 28, 2010 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside 4P- COMMITTEE MEMBERS -V Greg Pettis, Chair / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City Scott Matas, Vice Chair / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / To Be Appointed, City of Blythe Ray Quinto / Jim Hyatt, City of Calimesa Mary Craton / Jordan Ehrenkranz, City of Canyon Lake Eduardo Garcia / Steven Hernandez, City of Coachella Robin Lowe / Eric McBride, City of Hemet Bob Magee / Melissa Melendez, City of Lake Elsinore Terry Henderson / Don Adolph, City of La Quinta Rick Gibbs / Randon Lane, City of Murrieta Steve Adams / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside, District II Jeff Stone, County of Riverside, District III %P. STAFF .qt Anne Mayer, Executive Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer 4P- AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY -Qc? Annual Budget Development and Oversight Competitive Federal and State Grant Programs Countywide Communications and Outreach Programs Countywide Strategic Plan Legislation Measure A Implementation Public Communications and Outreach Programs Short Range Transit Plans Comments are welcomed by the Committee. If you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. 11.36.06 " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE www.rctc.orq AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agendi 9:30 a.m. - Monday, June 28, 2010 BOARD ROOM County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor Riverside, California In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.orq. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at /east 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Committee may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Committee, waive this three minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. Also, the Committee may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Committee shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Budget and Implementation Committee June 28, 2010 Page 2 Under the Brown Act, the Board should not take action on or discuss matters • raised during public comment portion of the agenda which are not listed on the agenda. Board members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MAY 24, 2010 6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Committee. If there are less than 2/3 of the Committee members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) 7. FISCAL YEARS 2011-15 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS Overview This item is for the Committee to: Page 1 1) Approve the FYs 201 1-15 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) for Local Streets and Roads as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 8. MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS — MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT BASE YEAR EXTENSION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 AND THE 2009 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES Page 3 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve using the 1989 Measure A Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base year amount for the FY 2010/11 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE certification; 2) For cities incorporated after 1989, excluding the cities of Menifee and Wildomar, approve using the Proposition 42 MOE amount for the FY 2010/1 1 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE certification; 3) Approve the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE Guidelines; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. • • Budget and Implementation Committee June 28, 2010 Page 3 9. COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING INCIDENTAL USE POLICY Overview This item is for the Committee to: POLICY AND CONTENT GUIDELINES, AND Page 12 1) Adopt a Commercial Advertising Policy and Content Guidelines, and Incidental Use Policy; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 10-01 1, "A Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Adopting a Commercial Advertising Policy and Content Guidelines, and an Incidental Use Policy Covering Concession Stands, Merchandising, and Contractor Services for Commission -Owned Facilities and Property"; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSIT SERVICES FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 Overview This item is for the Committee to: Page 26 1) Conduct a public hearing at the July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the FY 2010/11 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2010/11 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP); 5) Adopt Resolution No. 10-025, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds"; and 6) Forward to the Commission for final action. • Budget and Implementation Committee June 28, 2010 Page 4 11. TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT GENERATING ECONOMIC RECOVERY II • TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE AND INNOVATION ACT PROGRAM Page 43 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Authorize staff to apply for Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery II (TIGER II) Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) program for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvements Project (SR-91 CIP); 2) Authorize staff to support regionally significant projects nominated for TIGER II by members of the Southern California Consensus Group (SCCG), as appropriate; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 12. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal Legislation; 2) Approve the following bill positions: a) AB 1955 (De La Torre) - OPPOSE; b) H.R. 891 (McGovern) - SUPPORT; c) S. 322 (Schumer) - SUPPORT; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 13. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 14. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT Overview Page 45 This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report on attended and upcoming meeting/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. • 15. ADJOURNMENT AND NEXT MEETING The next Budget and Implementation Committee meeting is scheduled to be • held at 9:30 a.m., Monday, July 26, 2010, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE SIGN -IN SHEET JUNE 28, 2010 E MAIL ADDRESS l/�e Gt� (471pli_ejNAME z' L �,��Z C J,_iry. i D� l n, a ✓�" `cl . At A kjdeiLC iAter R6—' pj _ (J4-TNE D2A c_C, , E r1 15 =y._-,, , cr, alezti-,:ti_L„ 4:,,, f » -0-e o /I ic1 , rjs dP 1�Lze4✓22,e_0 -(_ _ 4 s )._. 6 tk(z....\. rs -��,) w„ ,-c- �` R9/3 9/275 s 01 E.CJG,g_ RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE ROLL CALL JUNE 28, 2010 County o. , _ tde�, Dirtrict II County of Riverside, District III Cityxof Beat City of Blythe City of Calrrr:._ City of Canyon Lake City of . City of Coachella City of Desert.-lot#;SRrings City of Hemet City of Lake Etsrriore City of La Quinta City of Murrfet City of Riverside City of Present Absent O D n " AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE Monday, May 24, 2010 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee was called to order by Chair Pro Tem Mary Craton at 9:30 a.m., in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At this time, Commissioner Russell Betts led the Budget and Implementation Committee in a flag salute. 3. ROLL CALL Members/Alternates Present Steve Adams Russell Betts Roger Berg Mary Craton Terry Henderson Bob Magee Ron Roberts John Tavaglione Jeff Stone Members Absent Joseph DeConinck Eduardo Garcia Rick Gibbs Robin Lowe Greg Pettis Ray Quinto 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests to speak from the public. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES  APRIL 26, 2010 M/S/C (Adams/Tavaglione) to approve the minutes of April 26, 2010, as submitted. Abstain: Betts Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 2 6. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There were no additions/revisions to the agenda. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent CRendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. M/S/C (Adams/Stone) to approve the following Consent Calendar item(s): 7A. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the nine -month period ended March 31, 2010; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 7B. GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD STATEMENT NUMBER 54 FUND BALANCE REPORTING AND GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPE 1) Receive and file the Commission's new fund balance reporting policy; 2) Approve the commitment of unexpended fund balance at June 30, 2010, in the Right of Way Management fund for right of way management services relating to rail and highway properties; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 7C. RESOLUTION NO. 10-015, RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ESTABLISHING THE COMMISSION'S APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 1) Approve Resolution No. 10-015, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Commission's Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2010/11 "; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. " " Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 3 7D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2010; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 7E. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2010; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 7F. FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 MINIMUM FARE REVENUE RATIO FOR RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY AND SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 1) Reaffirm the methodology used to calculate the required fare box recovery ratio; 2) Approve the FY 2010/11 minimum fare revenue to operating cost ratio of 17.13% for the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and 18.14% for the SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine); and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 8. PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 Chair Pro Tem Craton congratulated staff for receiving the Government Finance Officers' Association (GFOA) award for the Commission's distinguished Budget for FY 2009/10. Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager, presented the proposed Budget for FY 2010/11, and discussed the following areas: " Budget adjustments and summary; " Funding sources; " Summary of expenditures Management Services, Regional and Capital Programs; " Capital Program expenditure highlights; " Functional uses breakdown; " Measure A administration; and " Next steps. Commissioner Terry Henderson commended staff for its Budget for FY 2010/11. Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 4 Anne Mayer, Executive Director, expressed it is important to note the Commission has a $500 million reserve because Measure A receipts and other funds have been set aside in order to close out the 1989 Measure A program, as well as the start up of the 2009 Measure A program. She expressed appreciation to staff that contributed in the budget process. Chair Pro Tem Craton encouraged the Commission to continually express appreciation to the voters for approving both the 1989 and 2009 Measure A programs. M/S/C (Stone/Henderson) to: 1) Receive input on the proposed Budget for FY 2010/11; 2) Forward to the Commission to close the public hearing to receive input on the proposed Budget for FY 2010/11; and 3) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2010/11. 9. AGREEMENT WITH ELITE ELECTRIC INC. TO PROVIDE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE FIVE COMMISSION -OWNED COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS AND THE PERRIS TRANSIT CENTER IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Greg Moore, Procurement and Assets Manager, provided a brief overview of the lighting maintenance services agreement with Elite Electric Inc. (Elite). Commissioner Jeff Stone requested staff provide comprehensive information on the procurement process, including bid amounts for all proposers and justification to support the recommendation and asked if Elite was the lowest bidder. Greg Moore concurred and replied that the award was based on technical and cost criteria. Additionally, Elite presented the lowest bid. Anne Mayer replied the proposer and criteria information will be included in the agenda item that will be forwarded to the Commission for final approval in June 2010. M/S/C (Henderson/Stone) to: 1) Award Agreement No. 10-24-082-00 to Elite Electric, Inc. for lighting maintenance services at the five Commission -owned commuter rail stations and the Perris Transit Center for a three-year period, and two one-year options, for a total contract amount of $550,000; and i • • " " " Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 5 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. AMENDMENT TO SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Fina Clemente, Transit Manager, presented Agenda Items 10 and 11 concurrently. She presented the requests from RTA and SunLine to amend their FY 2009/10 short range transit plans. M/S/C (Stone/Tavaglione) to: 1) Approve a modification to the SunLine FY 2009/10 operating assistance funding by amending the original amount from $22,735,270 to $21,903,610 due to a combination of decreases in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds, Measure A funding, and federal Sections 5307, 5311, and 5317 allocations; 2) Approve a modification to SunLine's FY 2009/10 capital improvement program by using FY 2006/07 carryover funds of $502,865 in State Transit Assistance (STA), replacing previously approved LTF for local match to federally funded capital projects; and using an additional $594,000 in Section 5309 to replace Section 5307 funds for the bus rehabilitation project; 3) Approve a budget adjustment to the FY 2009/10 budget to reflect a reduction of $761,500 in LTF and $546,000 in Measure A expenditures; 4) Approve an amendment to SunLine's FY 2009/10 SRTP to reflect these changes; and 5) Forward to the Commission for final action. 11. AMENDMENT TO RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN M/S/C (Stone/Tavaglione) to: 1) Approve a modification to the RTA FY 2009/10 operating assistance funding by allocating $50,000 in Measure A funds designated for Specialized Transit/Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA) for Western Riverside County (Western County); Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 6 2) Approve a modification to RTA's FY 2009/10 capital improvement program to reflect an additional $4,007,425 in Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) and $3,508,333 in FY 2008/09 Proposition 1 B grant funding; 3) Approve Amendment No. 1 to RTA's FY 2009/10 SRTP to reflect these changes; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. 12. FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Jillian Edmiston, Staff Analyst, provided an overview of the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program funding recommendations for FY 2010/11. Anne Mayer stated the Commission has been able to award funding to many important projects than originally anticipated because of the current bid environment. M/S/C (Stone/Tavaglione) to: 1) Approve the FY 2010/11 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program recommended funding as shown in the attached schedule; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. Chair Pro Tem Craton expressed gratitude to the Committee on behalf of the city of Canyon Lake for approving this agenda item. 13. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM REALLOCATION FOR THE CITY OF BEAUMONT M/S/C (Stone/favaglione) to: 1) Grant the city of Beaumont (Beaumont) a reallocation of unused SB 821 funds from its FY 2008/09 SB 821 project to its FY 2009/10 SB 821 project; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. " " " Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 7 14. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA IV S/C (Stone/Tavaglione) to: 1) Grant the city of Temecula (Temecula) an extensron to June 30, 2011 for approved SB 821 program funds for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Overcrossing project; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 15. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director, presented an overview of the federal and state legislative activities. Commissioner Steve Adams expressed concern for the proposed American Power Act by Senator John Kerry and Senator Joe Lieberman as it will negatively impact the entire nation and it will not facilitate transportation improvements. John Standiford concurred. In response to Commissioner Henderson's clarification on Proposition 42 that has developed into an excise tax, John Standiford replied it does not have the Proposition 42 protection; it has constitutional protection in that it cannot be utilized for non -transportation purposes; and it could be borrowed against. He provided an overview on the constitutional protection. In response to Commissioner Henderson's clarification about temporarily borrowing against the excise tax, John Standiford replied the current proposal states it must be repaid with interest within three years to the highway fund it originated from. In response to Chair Pro Tem Craton's question about the appropriateness of using the excise tax funds to pay off transportation bonds, John Standiford stated that it will be used for debt service on the transportation bonds. Commissioner Henderson commended Anne Mayer and Commission programming staff for receiving the approval from the California Transportation Commission ICTC) for project funding requests. Budget and Implem6ntation Committee Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 8 Anne Mayer thanked Commissioner Henderson for her comments and recognized Grace Alvarez, Staff Analyst; Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager; and Andrea Zureick, Senior Staff Analyst, as staff responsible for funding from federal and state sources to the Commission and keeping projects moving forward. She discussed the Riverside County 2010 State Transportation Improvement Program (STI.P) Proposed Programming/CTC Approved Programming handout related to projects approved by the. CTC on May 20, after the Budget and Implementation Committee agenda had been mailed. Anne Mayer stated there will be a 2010 STIP adoption agenda item going forward to the June Commission meeting. M/S//C to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 16. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar. 17. COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS/STAFF Chair Pro Tem Craton expressed to the public that while the Budget and Implementation Committee meeting may have been brief, the Commissioners thoroughly reviewed the Commission's proposed Budget for FY 2010/11. 18. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Budget and Implementation Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:13 a.m. The next meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee is scheduled for June 28, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Ok)"Nac. Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board H0.-- AGENDA ITEM 7 • " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 28, 2010 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Andrea Zureick, Senior Staff Analyst Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager'_ THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Years 2011-15 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the FYs 2011-15 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) for Local Streets and Roads as submitted; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Measure A imposes several requirements on local agencies requesting to receive local streets and roads funds. First, the Coachella Valley and Western County cities and the county must be participating in either the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) or Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. Western County agencies must also participate in the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan managed by the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). The cities of Beaumont and La Quinta are not TUMF participants, and Commission staff is in the process of obtaining confirmation from CVAG, WRCOG, and RCA regarding the current participation in their programs. Additionally, agencies are required to annually provide to the Commission a CIP detailing how those funds are to be expended and an annual certification of maintenance of effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. On February 8, 2010, Commission staff provided the local agencies with Measure A revenue projections for local streets and roads to assist in preparation of the required CIP and the FY 2009/10 MOE base year amounts approved by the Commission on July 8, 2009, to which the agency would certify their programs. The required CIP, MOE certification, and supporting documentation have been received from all of the local agencies. The FY 2010/11 disbursements are expected to begin in September 2010. 1 The CIPs received are posted on the Commission's website and are on file at the Commission office. Attachment: FYs 2011-15 Measure A Five -Year CIPs — Posted on Commission's Website 2 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2010 to 2011 Agency: City of Calimesa Page __1__of __1__: Prepared by: Carlos Zamano Phone Number: (909) 795-9804 Date: May 28, 2010 Item No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs Measure A Funds 1 Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, & reconstruction projects on an annual basis—Prop 1B Funding $440,000 $44,000 2 Pavement reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard Rehabilitate Pavement on Avenue “L” after the completion of the storm drainage project—STP local monies $82,000 $14,000 3 Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood Avenue Landscape Calimesa Boulevard with additional planters, trees, decorative lighting, and gazebo shades as required---Transportation Enhancement Grant $385,000 $33,000 4 Calimesa Boulevard and County Line Road Intersection improvements, west to the Interstate 10 Freeway Work with pre-planning conceptual design, water agency legal requirements, etc. prior to widening intersection of County Line Road and Calimesa Boulevard, re-establish potable water well— DEMOSTL grant monies $65,000 $65,000 5 Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project from County Line Road to Avenue “L” (Project is scheduled to go to bid on July 13, 2010) Construct sidewalk and related incidental storm drainage facilities to facilitate to-and-from school pedestrian safety--- TCSPPP-CALTRANS grant $1,106,000 $235,000 6 Desert Lawn Drive and Cherry Valley Boulevard Widening Work with pre-planning and/or pre-design conceptual work for additional street widening and safety construction, involving new paving, right- of-way, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, signals, etc. $3,375,000 $75,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2011 to 2012 Agency: City of Calimesa Page __1__of __1__: Prepared by: Carlos Zamano Phone Number: (909) 795-9804 Date: May 28, 2010 Item No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs Measure A Funds 1 Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, & reconstruction projects on an annual basis— $43,000 $34,000 2 Pavement reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard Observe rehabilitated pavement on Avenue “L” after the completion of the storm drainage project— STP local monies $65,000 $15,000 3 Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood Avenue Re-slurry or fog-seal street, maintain all electrically decorated trees and gazebo shades as required $65,000 $31,000 4 Calimesa Boulevard and County Line Road Intersection improvements, west to the Interstate 10 Freeway Acquire right-of-way to widen intersection of County Line Road and Calimesa Boulevard, acquire new lot on which to re-establish a potable water well—DEMOSTL grant monies $1,791,000 $690,000 5 Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project from County Line Road to Avenue “L” (Project should be completed by November 1, 2010) Observe sidewalk and related incidental storm drainage facilities for settlement and/or cracking issues. $8,000 $5,000 6 Desert Lawn Drive and Cherry Valley Boulevard Widening Start street widening and safety construction, involving new paving, right- of-way, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, signals, and signage, etc. $3,000,000 $599,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2012 to 2013 Agency: City of Calimesa Page __1__of __1__: Prepared by: Carlos Zamano Phone Number: (909) 795-9804 Date: May 28, 2010 Item No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs Measure A Funds 1 Various streets city wide Slurry seal, & reconstruction projects. If decided upon, use eco-friendly rubberized asphalt on future projects. $65,000 $40,000 2 Pavement reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard Fog seal rehabilitated pavement on Avenue “L” after the completion of the storm drainage project $42,000 $20,000 3 Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood Avenue Observe and note deficiencies in the landscaping and lighting on Calimesa Boulevard. Remove graffiti as req’d. $13,000 $8,000 4 Calimesa Boulevard and County Line Road Intersection improvements, west to the Interstate 10 Freeway Widen intersection of County Line Road and Calimesa Boulevard, re- establish potable water well—DEMOSTL grant monies $426,000 $26,000 5 Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project from County Line Road to Avenue “L” Fog seal paving and repair incidental damage/wear on sidewalks and related storm drainage facilities. Remove graffiti as required. $55,000 $40,000 6 Desert Lawn Drive and Cherry Valley Boulevard Widening Complete additional street widening and safety construction, involving new paving, right-of-way, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, signals, and signage $300,000 $30,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2013 to 2014 Agency: City of Calimesa Page __1__of __1__: Prepared by: Carlos Zamano Phone Number: (909) 795-9804 Date: May 28, 2010 Item No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs Measure A Funds 1 Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, & reconstruction projects on an annual basis. Study construction needed to improve traffic flows. $152,000 $112,000 2 Pavement reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard Observe previous pavement protection measures on Avenue “L” after the completion of the storm drainage project. $10,000 $5,000 3 Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood Avenue Observation and graffiti removal on landscaping, lighting, and gazebos on Calimesa Boulevard $155,000 $15,000 4 Calimesa Boulevard and County Line Road Intersection improvements, west to the Interstate 10 Freeway Slurry seal intersection of County Line Road and Calimesa Boulevard. Re- stripe as req’d. DEMOSTL grant monies $190,000 $90,000 5 Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project from County Line Road to Avenue “L” Fog seal paving work along Third Street. Remove graffiti and repair incidental vandalism, etc. $42,000 $20,000 6 Desert Lawn Drive and Cherry Valley Boulevard Widening Observe and re-stripe paving as required. Re-time traffic signals as required to enhance traffic flow and reduce pollution $55,000 $25,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2014 to 2015 Agency: City of Calimesa Page __1__of __1__: Prepared by: Carlos Zamano Phone Number: (909) 795-9804 Date: May 28, 2010 Item No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs Measure A Funds 1 Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, & reconstruction projects on an annual basis—Prop 1B Funding $100,000 $44,000 2 Pavement reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard Observe durability of rubberized asphalt slurry seal Avenue “L” after the completion of the storm drainage project $55,000 $25,000 3 Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood Avenue Re-slurry seal and re-stripe Calimesa Boulevard. Repair planter irrigation and lighting systems as required. $75,000 $50,000 4 Calimesa Boulevard and County Line Road Intersection improvements, west to the Interstate 10 Freeway Test and review durability of rubberized asphalt. Remove graffiti and repair vandalism at intersection of County Line Road and Calimesa Boulevard. $100,000 $45,000 5 Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project from County Line Road to Avenue “L” Chip seal paving on Third Street to protect original street surface. $145,000 $45,00 6 Desert Lawn Drive and Cherry Valley Boulevard Widening Chip seal new paving, repair signage and striping as required. Remove graffiti as required. $275,000 $75,000 908 Park Avenue Calimesa, California 92320 ● (909) 795-9801 City Of Calimesa Project Progress Report Calimesa City Street Maintenance Program May 28, 2010 The City of Calimesa has an aggressive and on-going pavement management and protection program. The City of Calimesa is unique in that the City is small enough so the Public Works Director can personally inspect the streets and the related streetscape “furniture” for decay and faults. Due to the personalized nature of this inspection, it is currently not possible to list exactly what streets will be scheduled for fog seal, slurry seal, or chip seal in any given fiscal year. However, it is possible to say that the streets in the best condition in any given fiscal year will be given the attention needed to keep them as the “best streets” while the streets that need reconstruction will be reconstructed as the larger budget allows. Pavement Reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard May 28, 2010 This project is currently on “hold” until the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District completes a major addition to their pipeline system under Avenue “L”. It is anticipated that the initial pavement reconstruction will begin late in Fiscal Year 2010/2011. This will not be an ongoing project once the asphalt overlay is completed. However, based on current civil engineering pavement management theories, this reconstruction will receive aggressive pavement maintenance to ensure its longevity. Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project Status Report Calimesa Boulevard from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood May 28, 2010 This project is currently in the design stage, with an expanded study on the possibility of piping/covering Calimesa Creek. The study is checking the feasibility of converting the old Calimesa Creek alignment into an avian preserve and/or a xeriscape demonstration garden for local native specie exhibits. The current environmental review is moving smoothly with no anticipated delays. The local businesses are hopeful this project will go out to bid soon with the actual 908 Park Avenue Calimesa, California 92320 ● (909) 795-9801 construction beginning late in the 2009/2010 Fiscal Year. Completion will occur in Fiscal Year 2011/2012. County Line Road/Calimesa Boulevard Intersection Improvement Project Status Report May 28, 2010 The County Line Road/Calimesa Boulevard Improvement is very much a needed project within the City; however, it is also a project that is fraught with problems. The are ongoing discussions internally among the City Staff about how to deal with the right-of-way acquisition issues on County Line Road, construction near a “blue line” stream, and the relocation of an active City well. The California Department of Fish and Game has been contacted as part of the aforementioned study on the feasibility of piping/covering Calimesa Creek. This project will not start before late in Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The street improvement portion of the project itself is not expected to take longer than six months to complete. The bridge (culvert) widening on Calimesa Boulevard will be done concurrently with County Line Road Street improvements but this aspect of the construction may take longer than six months to complete. The relocation and drilling of the replacement well will undoubtedly be done independently of the street and bridge improvement work on an unknown time frame dictated by the local water agency. (Currently, CALTRANS is reinforcing the Interstate 10 overcrossing at County Line Road; this work will benefit our road widening project.) Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement, Segment 1 May 28, 2010 The plans and the specifications for the Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project have been completed and are ready for bid advertisement. Currently CALTRANS is reviewing the plans, the specifications, and the contract documents as part of their Request for Authorization for Construction (RFA— Construction) process. The City of Calimesa anticipates this project will be completed by November 1, 2010. Most of the right-of-entry permits necessary for some on the construction have been re-verified as valid (e.g., the same property owner) with verification of the remaining few outstanding unverified right-of-entry permits being actively pursued. CALTRANS has approved the various phases of the environmental documents. 908 Park Avenue Calimesa, California 92320 ● (909) 795-9801 Cherry Valley Boulevard/Desert Lawn Drive Improvements May 28, 2010 With the unprecedented collapse of subdivision financing in 2008, the City of Calimesa is currently studying and discussing how best to widen and improve the existing streets south of Interstate 10 to facilitate an approved commercial development that has been delayed due to financial reasons. Even though the development can be served with the existing streets, the traffic generation potential of this development will warrant a “fast track” approach to completing the project when the various studies are completed. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAMFY 2011 - 2015Agency: City of Canyon LakePage 1 of 1Prepared by: Habib MotlaghPhone #:(951) 943-6504Date: 2/24/2010ItemTotal Cost Measure ANo.Project Name / Limits Project Type($000's)Funds ($000's)1 Rehabilitation and Widening of Pavement Replacement, Widening, 6,000 * 623Railroad Canyon Road Signal Modification, Striping, UtilityRelocation, Median Improvements*City may request advane of Fundsto deliver the project in FY 2010/11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010-11 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Sheila McGrath-Hibdon, Engineering Financial Analyst Phone #: (760) 770-0319 Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name / Limits Total Cost Item No. Capital Projects Project Type ($000’s) Measure A ($000’s) 1 Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy. 2,172.6 1,021.1 2 Engineering & Planning Departments Transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as highway design and related engineering activities. 1,983.0 356.9 3 Risk Management Traffic related claims management. 2,322.6 46.7 4 Traffic Signal Maintenance (on-going maintenance agreement) Maintenance of traffic signal system. 600.1 120.0 5 Capital Improvement Projects (on-going and proposed projects) Various Traffic / transportation related projects. 9,059.9 881.3 $ 16,148.2 $ 2,426.0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011-12 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Sheila McGrath-Hibdon, Engineering Financial Analyst Phone #: (760) 770-0319 Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name / Limits Total Cost Item No. Capital Projects Project Type ($000’s) Measure A ($000’s) 1 Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy. 2,237.7 1,051.8 2 Engineering & Planning Departments Transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as highway design and related engineering activities. 2,042.6 367.7 3 Risk Management Traffic related claims management. 2,402.6 48.1 4 Traffic Signal Maintenance (on-going maintenance agreement) Maintenance of traffic signal system. 618.0 123.6 5 Capital Improvement Projects (on-going and proposed projects) Various Traffic / transportation related projects. 6,366.9 415.5 $ 13,637.9 $ 2,006.5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012-13 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Sheila McGrath-Hibdon, Engineering Financial Analyst Phone #: (760) 770-0319 Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name / Limits Total Cost Item No. Capital Projects Project Type ($000’s) Measure A ($000’s) 1 Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy. 2,304.9 1,083.3 2 Engineering & Planning Departments Transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as highway design and related engineering activities. 2,103.9 378.7 3 Risk Management Traffic related claims management. 2,474.7 49.5 4 Traffic Signal Maintenance (on-going maintenance agreement) Maintenance of traffic signal system. 636.6 127.3 5 Capital Improvement Projects (on-going and proposed projects) Various Traffic / transportation related projects. 18,964.2 25.1 $ 26,484.3 $ 1,664.0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013-14 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Sheila McGrath-Hibdon, Engineering Financial Analyst Phone #: (760) 770-0319 Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name / Limits Total Cost Item No. Capital Projects Project Type ($000’s) Measure A ($000’s) 1 Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy. 2,374.0 1,115.8 2 Engineering & Planning Departments Transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as highway design and related engineering activities. 2,167.0 390.0 3 Risk Management Traffic related claims management. 2,499.5 50.0 4 Traffic Signal Maintenance (on-going maintenance agreement) Maintenance of traffic signal system. 643.0 128.6 5 Capital Improvement Projects (on-going and proposed projects) Various Traffic / transportation related projects. 24,983.2 11.7 $ 32,666.7 $ 1,696.1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014-15 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Sheila McGrath-Hibdon, Engineering Financial Analyst Phone #: (760) 770-0319 Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name / Limits Total Cost Item No. Capital Projects Project Type ($000’s) Measure A ($000’s) 1 Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy. 2,445.2 1,149.3 2 Engineering & Planning Departments Transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as highway design and related engineering activities. 2,232.0 401.8 3 Risk Management Traffic related claims management. 2,524.4 50.5 4 Traffic Signal Maintenance (on-going maintenance agreement) Maintenance of traffic signal system. 649.4 130.0 5 Capital Improvement Projects (on-going and proposed projects) Various Traffic / transportation related projects. 12,226.3 11.7 $ 20,077.4 $ 1,743.1 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2009-2010 PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 21, 2010 OPERATIONS: 156-8301 Measure A Expended to Date:88,413$ 161-xxxx Measure A Expended to Date:692,749$ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: ONGOING PROJECTS CIP No. 1002 Perez Road Pavement Rehabiliation. This project is now complete Total Project Budget:(1,505,180)$ Measure A Allocation:(282,382)$ Measure A Expended To Date:282,382$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:-$ 1003 Total Project Budget: $ (2,525,000) Measure A Allocation:(1,226,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:552,507$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(673,493)$ 1010 Total Project Budget: $ (132,986,000) Measure A Allocation:(433,334)$ Measure A Expended To Date:391,899$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(41,435)$ 1011 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (344,290) Total Allocated Measure A:(50,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:-$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(50,000)$ The following projects, programs and operations were listed in prior Five-Year Plans and Project Status Reports, have been added as new projects, have been cancelled or amended. All Operations and Capital Projects utilize a combination of Measure A and other funding sources. The following figures are un-audited and reflect expenditures through June 02, 2010. Traffic Signal Maintenance Annual Contract: The City has a contract with Honeywell to perform signal maintenance of its 46 traffic signals. City Public Works Department operations, including parkway and median maintenance and street lighting charges. Agua Caliente School and Dream Homes Area Curb Ramps: The project will provide for the installation of ADA barrier free access to Agua Caliente School Ramon Road Widening East of Date Palm: To widen and rehabilitate Ramon Road, east of Date Palm to the east City limits. This project will be complete during during FY 10/11. DaVall / I-10 Interchange: Construct new regional arterial improvement including: the widening of Da Vall Rd. from 2 to 6 lanes between Dinah Shore and Ramon Rd., widening from 2 to 6 lanes from Ramon Rd to McCallum Way, widening from 2 to 6 lanes from McCallum Way to Ave. 30, construct new 6-lane road Ave. 30 to I-10, and construct new 6-lane road I-10 to Varner Rd. This project is part of CVAG's Transportation Project Prioritization Study and is expected to begin construction during FY 2020 and is currently in the PID phase. An additional $91,494 in FY09 Measure A funding overages from CIP 1001, 1002, 2505, 8687, 8930 and 8941 was reallocated to this project during FY 09/10. Pg. 1 of 5 Updated 06/21/2010 Cathedral City Status Report FY 09/10 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2009-2010 PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 21, 2010 1013 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (239,560,000) Total Allocated Measure A:(40,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:26,060$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(13,940)$ 1014 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (176,533) Total Allocated Measure A:(22,769)$ Measure A Expended To Date:11,070$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(11,699)$ 1015 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (755,328) Total Allocated Measure A:(282,328)$ Measure A Expended To Date:282,328$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:-$ 1016 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (1,000,000) Total Allocated Measure A:(114,700)$ Measure A Expended To Date:1,672$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(113,028)$ 2012 Total Project Budget: $ (42,912,064) Measure A Allocation:(50,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:-$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(50,000)$ 2500 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (476,320) Total Allocated Measure A:(238,160)$ Measure A Expended To Date:13,769$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(224,391)$ 2512 Total Project Budget: $ (597,000) Measure A Allocation:(50,560)$ Measure A Expended To Date:20,227$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(30,333)$ Edom Hill Truck Climbing Lane: Climbing lane from Varner Rd. northerly for 4,700 linear feet as required by an agreement with Riverside Integrated Waste Management Bureau (IWMB). Landau / I-10 Interchange: To prepare the Project Initiation Document and other preliminary studies and documents necessary to construct a new 6-lane mixes flow, partial cloverleaf interchange iwth auxillary lanes and 4-two lane ramps, plus a 6-lane grade separation bridge over the UPRR tracks, including the widening of Landau Blvd. between Vista Chino and Varner Road. Cove Assessment District: This is an on-going project for sanitary sewer, street and other improvements in the Cove Area of Cathedral City. The second phase of this project is expected to be completed 07/2010. Perez Road Sewers: Necessary to eliminate septic tanks in compliance with State mandate. Sanitary sewer plans are complete and shelf ready; a funding strategy is currently being developed to construct the sewer improvements. Varner Road and Date Palm Drive Shoulder Stabilization: This project is to provide PM10 soil stabilization to reduce blowsand track-out onto City streets. Ramon Road at Whitewater River Bridge Widening: Necessary to eliminate lane restriction for capacity and safety, as well as a land deficiency, and to improve the structure efficiency rating. Lead agency may be Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) as an HBRR Indian Land project. Total estimated project cost is $10,000,000, of which $500,000 is Measure A funds. Anticipated timeframe to project completion is five years. Cathedral Canyon / Terrace Road: For the construction of missing sidewalks along Cathedral Canyon and Terrace Roads. Project to be completed during FY 09/10. Pg. 2 of 5 Updated 06/21/2010 Cathedral City Status Report FY 09/10 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2009-2010 PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 21, 2010 2513 Total Project Budget: $ (198,850) Measure A Allocation:(45,425)$ Measure A Expended To Date:9,317$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(36,108)$ 3522 Total Project Budget: $ (590,324) Measure A Allocation:(52,266)$ Measure A Expended To Date:52,266$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:-$ 6507 Total Project Budget: $ (48,419) Measure A Allocation:(48,419)$ Measure A Expended To Date:48,419$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:-$ 7011 Total Project Budget: $ (1,350,000) Measure A Allocation:(30,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:-$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(30,000)$ 8645 Total Project Budget: $ (81,350) Measure A Allocation:(25,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:1,827$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(23,173)$ 8670 Total Project Budget: $ (21,500,000) Measure A Allocation:(50,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:23,398$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(26,602)$ Whitewater Neighborhood Sidewalk Improvements: For infill sidewalks necessary to turn existing dirt, grass and native pathways within the Whitewater neighborhood between Dinah Shore Drive and Ramon Road into ADA compliant concrete sidewalks, driveway approaches and curb ramps. Whitewater Channel Bike Trail, Phas I, II & III: This project is to design and construct a Class I Bikeway along the eastside of the Whitewater Channel from Vista Chino Dr. to 30th Ave., and along both sides of 30th Ave. from the Whitewater Channel to Landau Bl. as well as along the eastside of the Whitewater Channel from 30th Ave. to Ramon Rd., and along both sides of Ramon Rd. from Whitewater Channel to Cathedral Canyon Dr. The final phase is along the eastside of the Whitewater Channel from Ramon Rd. to Dinah Shore Dr., and along both sides of Dinah Shore Dr. from the Whitewater Channel to Cathedral Canyon Dr. Date Palm Widening and Bridge Repair (N. of I-10 to Varner Rd. including Longs Creek Canyon Bridge): Project to include the widening of Date Palm, Long Canyon Creek Bridge, traffic signal at Verner Road and ROW acquisition in support of the Date Palm / I-10 Interchange project. Clean Streets Management: To provide for the on-going reduction of entrained road dust emissions as part of the City's arterial and auxiliary street maintenance and as part of the City's systematic approach in maintaining compliance with PM-10 standards. Alternative funding for FY11 has been secured and Measure funds will no longer be utilized. Other Corridor Signal Studies: A completed project to plan and/or implement traffic impact, signal timing and synchronization, traffic count, speed and other traffic related signal studies towards improving traffic flow, congestion and life expectancy to the City's arterial roadways and collector streets. Drainage Basins: On-going activities to acquire and construct retention/detention basins to prevent street flooding. Pg. 3 of 5 Updated 06/21/2010 Cathedral City Status Report FY 09/10 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2009-2010 PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 21, 2010 8691 Total Project Budget: $ (4,942,650) Measure A Allocation:(250,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:249,543$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(457)$ 8835 Total Project Budget: $ (38,006) Measure A Allocation:(17,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:1,416$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(15,584)$ 8915 Total Project Budget: $ (236,683) Measure A Allocation:(97,780)$ Measure A Expended To Date:87,473$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(10,307)$ 8919 Total Project Budget: $ (22,118,033) Measure A Allocation:(192,933)$ Measure A Expended To Date:100,876$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(92,057)$ 8921 Total Project Budget: $ (8,250,525) Measure A Allocation:(80,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:80,000$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:-$ 8946 Total Project Budget: $ (115,600) Measure A Allocation:(115,600)$ Measure A Expended To Date:3,609$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(111,991)$ 8988 Total Project Budget: $ (3,551,135) Measure A Allocation:(160,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:153,786$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(6,214)$ Date Palm / Varner Road Blowsand Abatement Windfences: For the installation of windfences on Date Palm Dr. from I-10 to Varner Rd. and along Varner Rd. from Date Palm Dr. northerly to the west City limits. E. Palm Canyon Bridge Widening at the West Cathedral Canyon Channel: To design and construct a widened bridge structure and approach lane to accommodate six lanes and sidewalks on the bridge. Construction of this project is expected to be completed within two years. Ramon Road West: Over the next three years this project will beautify and improve the Ramon Road corridor, increase traffic flow and reduce congestion. Ramon Road Median Islands: On-going project to construct and landscape median islands at various locations in Ramon Road. Cove Drainage: To construct storm drains in the upper and lower portions of the Cathedral City Cove area necessary to protect the Downtown core from a 100-year flood hazard. The project has 12 systems and was in two phases: Phase 1 is complete, Phase 2 is anticipated to be completed July 2010. Cathedral Canyon Bridge Whitewater Low Flow Crossing: To construct a new 4-lane bridge on Cathedral Canyon Dr. at the Whitewater River Channel to eliminate a low flow crossing. Design phase in anticipated during FY2010, ROW acquisition FY2011; construction is estimated to be completed during FY2012. ADA Compliance: For the on-going construction of access ramps and other disabled access improvements on public streets and sidewalks. Pg. 4 of 5 Updated 06/21/2010 Cathedral City Status Report FY 09/10 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2009-2010 PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 21, 2010 CAPITAL PROJECTS PENDING COUNCIL APPROVAL: PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (132,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(47,500)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (750,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(86,025)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (15,000,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(1,720,500)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (1,400,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(160,580)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ 2,700,000 Total Requested Measure A Allocation:309,690$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (2,300,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(263,810)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (600,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(68,820)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (250,000,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(28,675,000)$ South City Improvement District: This project will provide for sewers and streets in five areas north of the Whitewater River necessary to eliminate septic systems in the south city area and is expected to take five years to complete. Varner Road Traffic Signals: This project is necessary as a requirement of an agreement with Riverside IWMB and will include signals at Date Palm, Mountain View and Edom Hill. The project is estimated to be completed in two years. I-10 Infrastructure Study: On-going study to develop long range fees needed to provide infrastructure north of I-10. Total project cost is estimated at $132,000, of which $47,500 is Measure A funds. Varner Road Widening - Palm Drive to East City Limits E. Palm Canyon Road Widening - West of Cree Road E. Palm Canyon Road Widening - West of Perez Road E. Palm Canyon Road Widening - Between Sangate and Rancho Mirage city limits Cathedral Canyon Drive Rehabilitation at Dinah Shore Drive Pg. 5 of 5 Updated 06/21/2010 Cathedral City Status Report FY 09/10 Item No.Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 07/08 Measure A Allocation Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 2,305,000 08/09 Measure A Allocation Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,565,000 08/09 Small Rehab Projects Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 300,000 09/10 Measure A Allocation Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,047,000 Total Measure A Funds to be carried forward in 2010-2011 5,217,000 2010-2011 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,022,000 TOTALS 0 1,022,000 PRIOR YEAR MEASURE A FUNDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 Agency: City of Hemet Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Mike Gow Phone #: (951) 765-3870 Date: May 25, 2010 Item No.Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,047,000 1,047,000 TOTALS 1,047,000 1,047,000 Phone #: (951) 765-3870 Date: May 25, 2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2012 Agency: City of Hemet Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Mike Gow Item No.Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,078,000 1,078,000 TOTALS 1,078,000 1,078,000 Phone #: (951) 765-3870 Date: May 25, 2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012 - 2013 Agency: City of Hemet Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Mike Gow Item No.Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,122,000 1,122,000 TOTALS 1,122,000 1,122,000 Prepared by: Mike Gow Phone #: (951) 765-3870 Date: May 25, 2010 MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 Agency: City of Hemet Page 4 of 5 Item No.Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,178,000 1,178,000 TOTALS 1,178,000 1,178,000 Prepared by: Mike Gow Phone #: (951) 765-3870 Date: May 25, 2010 MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Agency: City of Hemet Page 5 of 5 MEASURE ‘A’ LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY Ending JUNE 30, 2010 Agency: City of Hemet Date: May 25, 2010 ; 2006/2007 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Project #5500) Progress to Date Project completed TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE $7,200.000 Completion Date May 11, 2010 ; 2007/08 Street Rehabilitation (Project #6503) Progress to Date Funds to be used for 2010-2011 Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project, which is currently in design. TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE $ 2,305,000 Completion Date To be determined ; 2008/09 Street Rehabilitation (Project #6504) Progress to Date Funds to be used for 2010-2011 Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project, which is currently in design. TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE $ 1,565,000 Completion Date To be determined ; 2008/09 Small Rehab/Paving Projects (Project #6505) Progress to Date Funds to be used for 2010-2011 Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project, which is currently in design. TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE $ 300,000 Completion Date To be determined ; 2009/10 Annual Pavement Rehab Project (Project #6506) Progress to Date Funds to be used for 2010-2011 Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project, which is currently in design. TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE $ 1,047,000 Completion Date To be determined Bridgette Moore, Mayor 23873 Clinton Keith Rd, Ste 201 Marsha Swanson, Mayor Pro Tem Wildomar, CA 92595 Sheryl Ade, Council Member 951.677.7751 Phone Bob Cashman, Council Member 951.698.1463 Fax Scott Farnam, Council Member www.CityofWildomar.org May 28, 2010 To: Andrea Zurieck,RCTC Fr: Diane Nguyen, City of Wildomar Re: Measure A Status Report for FY 09/10 Andrea, please find attached the expenditures in the Measure A capital programs. A concise narrative summary is below: Accessibility and Improvements: Work underway to design and engineer accessibility improvements. Roadway Safety and Traffic Signal Program: No expenditures in these programs. City staff anticipates conceptual design of improvements to occur later in FY 09/10 and early FY 10/11. Slurry Seal Program: In partnership with Riverside County, construction was completed on slurry seal improvements throughout the City. The predominant expenditures reflect costs of construction. Unpaved Roadway Program: City staff is evaluating street segments & locations as part of conceptual design. Citywide Maintenance Program: Funding used for various citywide maintenance efforts with most of the funds for January and February storm repairs. Please contact me at 951-970-9741 for questions. Diane Dated: May 28, 2010 MEASURE A "BUDGET"MEASURE A "ACTUAL" Budget --Reflects FY 08/09 Plus FY 09/10 Revenue ($549,084.39 + $348,000 = $897,084)Spent to Date 28 901 25 Measure 'A' Accessibility Improvements 45,000.00$ 35,440.90$ 28 902 25 Measure 'A' Roadway Safety Improvements 50,000.00$ 0 28 903 25 Measure 'A' Slurry Seal Program 155,000.00$ 109,310.00$ 28 904 25 Measure 'A' Traffic Signal Program 331,317.64$ 0 28 905 25 Measure 'A' Unpaved Roadway Program 50,000.00$ 8,870.00$ 28 906 25 Measure 'A' Citywide Maintenance Program 194,000.00$ 137,348.10$ 8 percent set-aside for Measure A Finance/Administration (8% of $897,084)71,766.75$ 23,277.52$ 897,084.39$ 314,246.52$ City of Wildomar Measure A Status Report July 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010 Bridgette Moore, Mayor 23873 Clinton Keith Rd, Ste 201 Marsha Swanson, Mayor Pro Tem Wildomar, CA 92595 Sheryl Ade, Council Member 951.677.7751 Phone Bob Cashman, Council Member 951.698.1463 Fax Scott Farnam, Council Member www.CityofWildomar.org May 18, 2010 Shirley Medina, Program Manager Attention: Andrea Zureick, Senior Staff Analyst - Programming Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor SUBJECT: CITY OF WILDOMAR MEASURE A 5-YEAR CIP Dear Ms. Medina: Please find enclosed The City of Wildomar’s Measure A 5-Year Expenditure Plan. The City Council of the City of Wildomar will take action on this plan at its June 9, 2010 meeting. I will forward you an executed resolution after the meeting. If you have any questions, please contact me at 951-970-9741. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Diane Nguyen Transportation Programs Manager Attachment A DRAFT MEASURE A EXPENDITURE PLAN Fiscal Year 2010/11 – 2014/15 CITY OF WILDOMAR LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM Prepared May 18, 2010 (Pending City Council approval June 9, 2010) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 18, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 Accessibility Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Citywide Maintenance Program 8% Overhead/Admin Line-Item Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal as needed Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets Interfund Transfer $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $50,000 $66,980 $27,920 $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $29,100 $66,980 $27,920 TOTAL Measure A Funds: $349,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2012 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 18, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 Accessibility Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Citywide Maintenance Program 8% Overhead/Admin Line-Item Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal as needed Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets Interfund Transfer $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $50,000 $74,758 $28,560 $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $28,682 $74,758 $28,560 TOTAL Measure A Funds: $357,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012 - 2013 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 13, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 Accessibility Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Citywide Maintenance Program 8% Overhead/Admin Line-Item Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal as needed Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets Interfund Transfer $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $50,000 $85,304 $29,440 $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $28,256 $85,304 $29,440 TOTAL Measure A Funds: $368,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 18, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 Accessibility Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Citywide Maintenance Program 8% Overhead/Admin Line-item Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal as needed Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets Interfund Transfer $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $50,000 $98,619 $30,560 $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $27,821 $98,619 $30,560 TOTAL Measure A Funds: $382,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 18, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 Accessibility Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Citywide Maintenance Program 8% Overhead/Finance Line-item Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal as needed Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets Interfund Transfer $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $50,000 $117,463 $32,160 $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $27,377 $117,463 $32,160 TOTAL Measure A Funds: $402,000 " AGENDA ITEM 8 " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 28, 2010 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager _��_ THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director SUBJECT: Measure A Local Streets and Roads  Maintenance of Effort Base Year Extension for Fiscal Year 2010/11 and the 2009 Maintenance of Effort Guidelines STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve using the 1989 Measure A Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base year amount for the FY 2010/11 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE certification; 2) For cities incorporated after 1989, excluding the cities of Menifee and Wildomar, approve using the Proposition 42 MOE amount for the FY 2010/11 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE certification; 3) Approve the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE Guidelines; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The 2009 Measure A ordinance established a local agency MOE requirement to ensure that Measure A funds do not supplant local discretionary funds for local streets and roads improvements. If local agencies do not meet their respective MOE base year level in a given year, Measure A Local Streets and Roads allocations will be withheld the following year. The Commission is authorized to establish guidelines for determining compliance with the MOE requirement. Last year, Commission staff and members of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) reviewed the methodology that was used in developing the 1989 MOE base year, which was the amount of construction and maintenance expenditures that local agencies included in the State Controller Streets report in 1989. Initially, staff believed that applying this method for construction and maintenance expenditures included in the State Controller Streets report in 2008, would be appropriate in determining the 2009 MOE base year for each local agency. However, during this review, staff and TAC members concluded that there were reporting inconsistencies and variances in the State Controller Streets report. Therefore, at Agenda Item 8 last year's Commission meeting, Commission staff and the TAC recommended allowing more time to develop an alternative method to calculate the 2009 MOE base year, as well as a new method to report street expenditures. It was also recommended that the 1989 MOE base year levels be used for FY 2009/10 reporting, which the Commission approved. Over the past year, several meetings have been held with the TAC 'subcommittee and TAC to develop a way to calculate the 2009 MOE base year and reporting method. The following is being recommended for the 2009 MOE base year calculation: • Local agencies will identify all general fund expenditures for transportation related construction and maintenance activities that occurred in FY 2009/10. • Local agencies will summarize the expenditures and identify expenditures to be considered as deductions, such as administrative/overhead costs and one-time expenditures. • Deductions will be reviewed and approved/rejected by the TAC subcommittee. • The approved deductions will be subtracted from general fund expenditures to determine the 2009 MOE base year for each city. The following is being recommended for 2009 MOE annual certification reporting: • Local agencies will complete the MOE report template to include discretionary general fund expenditures for construction and maintenance activities for the reporting year. • General ledger documentation/forms must be submitted as an attachment to the MOE report template. • MOE reports will be submitted to the Commission's auditor. • Commission staff will report to the TAC and Commission regarding the outcome of the auditor's findings regarding agencies meeting the MOE base year levels. • Local agencies that do not meet their MOE base year may submit a request for special consideration, which will be presented to the Commission. The draft 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE Guidelines, in Attachment 1 have been prepared and will be presented to the TAC at its June 21, 2010 meeting for approval. Implementation of the 2009 MOE requirement will begin using FY 2009/10 general ledger information to establish a MOE base year for each city. Since FY 2009/10 general ledger information will not be available until FY 2010/11, the MOE base year cannot be established and used for meeting the MOE base year requirement Agenda Item 8 • • • 4 " " until FY 2011/12. Therefore, Commission staff and the TAC recommend an extension of the 1989 MOE base year levels for the FY 2010/11 MOE certifications. For agencies that were incorporated after the 1989 Measure A MOE base year levels were established, it is recommended that these cities comply with the MOE levels used for Proposition 42 funds. The newly incorporated cities of Menifee and Wildomar will not have a MOE base year amount for, reporting in FY 2010/11. However, these local agencies will be required to meet their MOE base year once the FY 2009/10 base year level is established for each local agency per the process identified in this agenda item and the 2009 Measure A MOE Guidelines. Attachment 2 is the recommended MOE base year amounts for the cities to use for their FY 2010/11 MOE certification. Attachments: 1) Draft 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE Guidelines 2) Recommended FY 2010/11 Measure A MOE Base Year Levels Agenda Item 8 ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2009 MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES (Draft, June 16, 2010) General Program Policy 1. Authority and Purpose of Guidelines. Ordinance No. 02-001, adopted by the Riverside County Transportation Commission in 2002, approved a county -wide transportation expenditure plan and called for the placement of Measure A on the November ballot to secure voter approval of a %2 percent sales tax to fund transportation improvements. On November 5, 2002, Riverside County voters approved Measure A and collection of the sales tax commenced on July 1, 2009. Ordinance No. 02-001, in accordance with state law, imposes specific requirements that local agencies must meet to receive Measure A funds. In particular, the Ordinance requires that local agencies continue to expend the same amount for construction and maintenance of local streets and roads as expended in the past. The guidelines set forth below establish specific maintenance of effort requirements and are intended to satisfy the Commission's responsibility to ensure that local transportation expenditures are maintained. Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Requirements 2. Qualifications to Receive Measure A Local Streets and Roads Funds. To qualify for Measure A Local Streets and Roads (LSR) funding, Ordinance No. 02-001 requires local agencies to adhere to a number of requirements, which currently include: a. Implementation of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) developed by the Western Riverside Council of Govemments (WRCOG) or the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) (not applicable to Palo Verde Valley area local agencies); b. Participation in the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) (applies to Western County local agencies only); c. Annual submittal of a list of proposed Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)lactivities for Measure A LSR funds for a five year fiscal period; and d. Annual certification of discretionary General Fund expenditures for transportation related construction and maintenance activities meet or exceed the MOE Base Year amount (Attachment A), and commit to expending Measure A LSR funds to projects indentified in the agency's five year CIP. 6 Funds withheld from a local agency for failure to meets its MOE Base Year requirement will be distributed in accordance with Ordinance No. 02-01 within the Measure A area in which the agency is located (Western County, Coachella Valley, or Palo Verde Valley). 3. Calculation of MOE Base Year. The calculation of the MOE Base Year will be based on local agency discretionary General Fund expenditures for transportation related construction and maintenance activities that occurred in Fiscal Year 2009f1-0. Local agencies will summarize the expenditures and identify expenditures to be considered as deductions such as administrative/overhead costs that were not project specific and one- time expenditures. These deductions will be presented to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Subcommittee for review and approval. The approved deduction items will be subtracted from the total General Fund expenditures to determine the MOE Base Year for each city. A MOE Report Template (Attachment B) will be provided by Commission staff to the local agencies along with instructions to complete the report template. For local agencies that incorporate after July 1, 2009, the third fiscal year after incorporation will be used to determine the MOE Base Year and these local agencies will follow these guidelines for annually reporting construction and maintenance expenditures, MOE certification, and CIP submittal. Local agencies' MOE Base Years will be effective for the life of the 2009 Measure A program. 4. 2009 MOE Annual Certification Reporting. Annually, local agencies will complete the MOE Report Template to include discretionary General Fund expenditures for construction and maintenance activities for the reporting year. Local agencies should identify proposed deductions, if any, for non -project specific administrative/overhead costs and one-time expenditures for the reporting year on a comparable basis to the MOE Base Year calculation. Any new deductions will be reviewed by the TAC Subcommittee and Commission staff to ensure that deductions are appropriately applied. Additionally, local agencies will be required to submit documentation of expenditures by submitting General Ledger forms as an attachment to the MOE Report Template. Local agencies will be contacted if further information or clarification is needed. The MOE Reports and supporting documentation will be submitted to the Commission's auditors. The results of the audit process will be presented to the TAC and Commission and will indicate whether or not the local agencies are meeting the MOE Base Year amounts. 5. Requests for Special Consideration. When a determination has been made that a local agency has not met its MOE Base Year amount the local agency can file a request for special consideration with the Commission. The local agency must present evidence to the Commission demonstrating the need for special consideration. The Commission will • 7 " " " consider the special circumstances presented by the local agency and either approve or deny the request. Implementation of 2009 MOE Certification 6. Effective Date. The first year that the local agencies will certify under these guidelines is Fiscal Year 2011/12. Local Agencies will certify that discretionary General Fund transportation construction and maintenance expenditures for Fiscal Year 2011/12 will meet or exceed the 2009 MOE Base Year amount, and that Measure A LSR formula funds are designated to fund projects identified in its Measure A 5-year CIP submittal. The MOE certification is required to be signed by the City Manager. 7. 1989 MOE Carryover Balance. Local agencies that have positive balances from the 1989 MOE cycle will be allowed to carryover the balance into the 2009 MOE cycle for a limited period. Carryover balances will be determined from RCTC audit reports. The carryover only applies to the first two years of the 2009 Measure A MOE certification requirements. Therefore, carryover balances from FY 2008/09 can be carried over to meet the FY 2009/10 MOE certification, and FY 2009/10 balances can be carried over to meet the FY 2010/11 MOE certification. 8. 2009 MOE Excess Carryover. Carryover balances will be determined from RCTC audit reports. If a local agency has reported expenditures above the MOE Base Year level, the amount in excess of the MOE Base Year level can be applied in a future year to offset the amount the local agency may need to meet the MOE requirement. The use of excess carryover was also allowed under the 1989 MOE guidelines. Submittal Timelines for CIP, MOE Certification MOE Report Template and Deductions 9. Submittal timelines. The timelines below are to be considered "general' and may be modified based on unique circumstances or to provide additional time as needed. 5-year CIP and MOE Certification Submittal: March The Commission will notify each local agency Public Works and Finance Departments that the 5-year CIP and MOE Certification are due. The notification will include Measure A revenue projections for LSR funds to assist the local agencies in preparing their respective CIPs. May Local Agencies will submit 5-year CIPs and MOE Certifications. July Commission staff will recommend that the Commission approve local agency 5-year CIPs. MOE Reporting and Proposed Deductions: June TAC Subcommittee will convene to review the MOE Report Template, reporting instructions, and definitions to ensure that the MOE reporting process is applied in a consistent a_ nd streamlined manner. July Commission staff will notify local agencies that the-MOE Report Template and proposed deductions are due and indicate due dates. Instructions will also be included for the MOE Report Template. August Local Agencies will submit proposed one-time deductions. Commission staff and the TAC subcommittee will review the proposed deductions for appropriateness. Commission staff will inform local agencies if proposed deductions are accepted for MOE Reporting. September Local Agencies will complete and submit the MOE Report Template and General Ledger support documentation. Sep — Nov Local Agency staff submits MOE Reports and General Ledger support documentation to auditors. Sep - March Auditors will submit findings to Commission staff. June Commission staff will present audit findings to TAC and Commission. MOE Certification Process Review 10. Review of MOE Reports/Process. As indicated above, to ensure consistency in reporting expenditures and deductions, the TAC Subcommittee will convene annually to review the MOE certification process including proposed deductions, instructions, and definitions of expenditures. • • • 9 " 2010-2039 MEASURE A PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned hereby agrees and certifies for (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance.No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Measure A  Local Streets and Roads) shall be used in compliance with, the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary General Funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation (construction and maintenance) purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Program. Enclosure: Agency 5-Year CIP City Manager Date 10 " " Fiscal Year 2010/11 Measure A Maintenance of Effort ATTACHMENT 2 Western County Agency Beaumont Calimesa Corona Hemet Lake Elsinore Murrieta Norco Perris Riverside San Jacinto Temecula 1989 MOE Base Year $ 164,325 $ 70,702 N/A N/A $ 1 784 399 $ 1,183,605 $ 503,339 $ 943,143 N/A 1,259 $ 399,945 $ 12,449,203 $ 143,347 N/A Prop 42 MOE 7,294 6,063 52,625 2,785,034 Coachella Valley Agency Coachella Desert Hot Spr Indian Wells Indio Palm Desert Rancho Mirage 1989 MOE Base Year $ 625,230 $ 69,663 $ 57,586 $ 55,962 $ 465,763 $ 904,798 $ 1,892,5/34 $ 1,191,036 Palo Verde Valley Blythe $ 475,677 11 " AGENDA ITEM 9 " " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: June 28, 2010 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee ._ FROM: Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager THROUGH: Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director SUBJECT: Commercial Advertising Policy and Content Guidelines, Incidental Use Policy and STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Adopt a Commercial Advertising Policy and Content Guidelines, and Incidental Use Policy; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 10-011, uA Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Adopting a Commercial Advertising Policy and Content Guidelines, and an Incidental Use Policy Covering Concession Stands, Merchandising, and Contractor Services for Commission -Owned Facilities and Property"; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission currently owns and operates five Metrolink stations. Contrasted against other member agencies within Metrolink, the Commission is unique in its ownership of its stations. Stations are typically owned by the municipality in which they are located. With ownership comes requirements for station maintenance, safety/security, utilities, and upgrades. In a declining revenue environment and with the increasing age of the Commission's stations, the costs for station operations and maintenance have increased and become more noticeable. In its ongoing efforts to optimize revenue to offset maintenance and operating costs, staff has developed a commercial advertising policy and will consider potential strategies to develop a revenue -generating advertising program. In 2003, the Commission took action to grant authority to the Executive Director to establish policies affecting rail station operations. Given the importance and sensitivity of this subject, review and consideration of this policy by the Commission is needed and appropriate as this policy revision constitutes a Agenda Item 9 12 significant change from the Commission's historic approach to generating commercial revenue from station properties. Any future action to implement advertising at the stations would also return to the Commission for approval and consideration. As a precursor to any such action, staff, in consultation with leap) counsel, is recommending adoption of Resolution No. 10-011 and corresporTding exhibits. Specifically, staff proposes a formal policy and guidelines to evaluate commercial advertising as shown in Exhibit A. Additionally, based on a review of federal regulations and guidance concerning incidental use of federally funded facilities, staff proposes a policy governing use of station properties to generate additional revenue through additional compatible uses as shown in Exhibit B. Incidental use refers to concession revenue from food sales, news racks, or other minor sources. Attachment: Resolution No. 10-01 1 Agenda Item 9 • • • 13 " RESOLUTION NO.10-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADOPTING A COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING POLICY AND CONTENT GUIDELINES, AND AN INCIDENTAL USE POLICY COVERING CONCESSION STANDS, MERCHANDISING, AND INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS FOR COMMISSION''_ OWNED FACILITIES AND PROPERTY WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Commission') owns real property, provides bus and commuter rail service throughout Riverside County and currently operates the following five commuter rail stations: (1) Downtown Riverside Station; (2) Pedley Station; (3) La Sierra Station; (4) West Corona Station; and (5) North Main Corona Station; and WHEREAS, for those spaces that have been authorized for commercial advertising and other revenue -generating uses, such incidental uses shall be allowed only so long as the following interests of Commission are preserved: (I) a safe, convenient and pleasant environment for users of Commission property, which includes maximizing use of its commuter rail stations by attracting and maintaining the patronage of the public; (2) protection of any minors who use Commission stations; and (3) the avoidance of any potential identification of the Commission with the point of view or message of the commercial advertisement placed by a third party; and WHEREAS, the Commission has further identified potential additional revenues sources beyond commercial advertising such as concessions and Commission -related merchandising programs to supplement existing operational and capital funds; and WHEREAS, these new programs are intended to supplement existing revenues generated from current fare rates and non -operating subsidies; and WHEREAS, this Policy authorizes the Executive Director to implement any reasonable time, place, manner restrictions necessary to maintain public safety, aesthetic standards and the promotion of public transportation; and WHEREAS, the Commission adopts the viewpointneutral and content -based commercial advertising guidelines as contained herein in order to provide direction to third parties seeking to use the Commission's designated advertising spaces; and WHEREAS, by adopting these guidelines, the Commission does not intend or propose to permit advertising that individually or commercially would cause any real or personal property owned or controlled by Commission to become a public forum for the dissemination, debate, and/or discussion of public issues unless permitted under the Commission's non-commercial free speech policy; and WHEREAS, the commercial advertising policy applies to advertising placed by a third party on any Commission property and does not prohibit the Commission from placing 14 advertisements and announcements related to its own or other governmental services, programs, or events not in violation of the viewpoint neutral content -based restrictions contained herein; and WHEREAS, the sale of newspapers, food and beverages shall be regulated under separate policies. The sale of non -Commission merchandise except for approved concession vendors is strictly prohibited at the commuter rail stations; and s WHEREAS, any advertising on bus shelters and benches within the public rights -of -way shall be governed by the then -current policies of the applicable jurisdiction. This Policy shall only apply to Commission owned real property and otherwise the commuter rail stations above. WHEREAS, the following Policy and Guidelines will be reviewed biennially (every two years) to reflect the current policies of the Commission and to reflect changes in the trends of social and economic acceptance and appropriateness of various forms of advertising and concessions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners as follows: Section 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this resolution by this reference. Section 2. Commission hereby adopts a "Commercial Advertising Policy and Guidelines" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. Commission hereby adopts an "Incidental Use Policy" attached hereto as Exhibit `B" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. Commission reserves the right to modify both Exhibits A and B at any time as may be required. Commission hereby authorizes the Executive Director to revise and enforce the provisions of both policies. Commission staff shall post revisions to either Policy on Commission's website at least thirty (30) calendar days before it becomes effective. Section 5. The Chairperson of the Board shall sign this Resolution and the Clerk of the Board shall certify the adoption thereof. This Resolution shall be effective on the date of its adoption. Section 6. The Board of Commissioners hereby finds that adoption of this Resolution is not subject to CEQA and authorizes and directs Commission staff as designated by the Executive Director to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of Riverside County and the State Clearinghouse within five (5) days following adoption of this Resolution. AYES: NOES: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2010. • 15 " " ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Bob Buster, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 16 " " " EXHIBIT "A" COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING POLICY AND CONTENT GUIDELINES A. POLICY STATEMENT The purpose of this Commercial Advertising Policy is to establish viewint-neutral and content -based guidelines that govern Commission's display of acceptable commercial advertisements. The display of commercial advertising is not intended to provide a general public forum for free speech purposes but rather to retain use of Commission property in a proprietary capacity. Allowing commercial advertising in certain locations on Commission property as a means of fee generation is a responsible incidental economic use of Commission's capital investments. Advertising placed by any third party (including vendors) on Commission property is not authorized unless permitted in accordance with this Policy and guidelines and a contract approved by the Commission. Issuance of any license agreements and related contracts must be in accordance with Commission's procurement policies. Commission reserves the right to reject any advertising based upon its guidelines for acceptable advertising content as outlined in this Policy. Locations for commercial advertising may include but are not limited to: commuter rail stations, parking structures, and fixed outdoor displays on any Commission -owned property. This Policy also provides guidelines as to the use of information signage space. Notwithstanding, Commission recognizes that advertising on its own properties is a critical means of communication with its patrons and users  including the adequate dissemination of transit and safety related information. Some informational signage space is currently available at the stations and reserved exclusively for Commission information: B. DEFINITION OF TERMS Key terms are defined as follows: " "Added Value Materials" - Informational advertising which offers a tangible benefit to patrons as a means of rewarding and retaining customers (i.e., a money - saving discount). " "Commercial advertisements" - Advertisements that (1) have as its primary purpose the promotion of a commercial transaction, such as the sale of real or personal property, services, entertaining and/or dining, which is offered to the public generally and (2) are not otherwise prohibited under the viewpoint neutral content -based restrictions below. " "Cross -Promotion" - A cooperative partnership in which two or more entities work together with the goal of jointly promoting their respective services. 17 " "Governmental Entities" - Public entities specifically created by government action. " "Map Cases" - Fixed cases in Commission Rail stations. Used to display Commission Rail System Maps and provide information on fares, routes, safety, sales locations, service changes and other matters relevant tothe use of the Metrolink System. " "Non -Commercial Advertising" - A public service announcement, event notification, political statement or other message which does not have as its primary purpose to propose a commercial transaction. These types of advertisements will not be accepted. C. COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING CONTENT GUIDELINES 1. Revenue-Generating/Commercial Advertising In accordance with the revenue -generating purpose of this Policy, the Commission shall accept only commercial advertisements. Non-commercial advertisements will not be accepted unless it is considered informational material as described below. Any person seeking to advertise, leaflet or solicit for political purposes are not covered by this Policy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Commission expressly reserves its proprietary right to display notices and advertisements relating to Commission's transit operations. The Commission may, but is not required, to contract with outside vendors to sell and display commercial advertising within the commuter rail stations and otherwise on its property for the sole purpose of generating revenue. Commission may sell or post advertising directly. Any vendors responsible for soliciting and posting commercial advertisements to third parties shall be authorized under contracts awarded by Commission through a competitive bidding process to the extent required under the Commission's procurement policy. All such contracts shall comply with these guidelines and following requirements: " Locations for commercial advertising on Commission property or rail right of way may include, but are not limited to: dedicated map cases, billboards, banners, bike lockers, vending machine shelters, fixed outdoor displays, electronic signage, and any other locations approved by the Commission. " Safety, aesthetic considerations, customer convenience, and Commission's need to convey transit -related and emergency information to passengers will take precedence over revenue generation. " Quantity, quality, and placement of all advertising will be controlled by and subject to the specific approval of Commission. " Commission reserves the right to review any proposed advertisement in advance and reject any proposed advertisement which does not meet the Commission's " " 18 " " " standards as set forth in this Policy. Each entity wishing to purchase advertising space shall submit an application in such form as approved by the Executive Director or his/ her designee, which shall include the proposed content of the advertisement. Such shall not prohibit contracting the sale and management of such advertising space to a third party pursuant to Commission's procurement policies and procedures. Before any advertisement is rejected, it -shall be referred to the Executive Director or his/her designee for Commission_ or appropriate action and a final decision. The following viewpoint -neutral content -based limitations for third party commercial advertising are established as follows: 2. Alcohol and Tobacco Advertising Advertising of all alcohol and tobacco products is prohibited. 3. Non -Commercial Advertising Commission does not accept advertising from non -governmental entities if the subject matter and intent of said advertising is non-commercial. Specifically, acceptable advertising must promote for sale, lease or other form of financial benefit a product, service, event or other property interest in primarily a commercial manner for primarily a commercial purpose. Exception: Governmental entities, meaning public entities specifically created by government action, may purchase or negotiate arrangements for advertising space for messages that advance specific government purposes. It is Commission's intent that government advertising will not be used for comment on issues of public debate. 4. Other Subject Matter Restrictions Advertising may not be displayed if its content: " Promotes, condones or relates to an illegal activity or which might be considered as derogatory toward any aspect of the law enforcement profession; or " Contains language which is obscene, vulgar, profane, or otherwise offensive to generally accepted sensibility and taste; or " Contains images, copy or concepts that actively denigrate or discriminate against a religious, ethnic, racial, sexual orientation, gender identity, or political group; " Contains images, copy or concepts that actively denigrate public transportation; or " Contains obscene matter as defined in state law, or sex -oriented material as defined in the Riverside County Municipal Code, Chapter 5.44; or 19 " Contains images, copy or concepts that appear to make a personal attack on any individual or upon any company, product, or institution; or falsely disparages any service or product or is defamatory in any respect; or " Contains images, copy or concepts that portrays acts, of violence, murder, sedition, terror, antisocial behavior, vandalism, or other acts of -violence against persons and/or institutions; or " Contains images, copy or concepts that depict nudity or portions of nudity that would be considered as offensive, distasteful, pornographic, or erotic, is obscene, or advertises adult entertainment. The rule of "public acceptance" should be used in such cases; i.e., if the advertisement has already gained public acceptance, then it may be considered as acceptable to Commission; or " Contains images, copy or concepts that contains political ads endorsing a candidate, measure or proposition; or " Contains images, copy or concepts that contains a religious message or promotes any religion; or " Contains images, copy or concepts that implies an endorsement by Commission for any service, product or point of view; or " Contains images, copy or concepts that are in conflict with any applicable federal, state, or local law, statute, or ordinance. 5. Display, Treatment and Maintenance Requirements Advertising must comply with the following: " Advertising placement or treatments will not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic, will not restrict the visibility of directional/traffic signs and informational material, and will not encroach on necessary sight lines (e.g., driver/operator view of waiting patrons) nor present any other safety risks or hazards. " Advertising industry standard sizes will be used for all advertising treatments. " Advertising treatments will be maintained in "like -new" condition. Damage to the advertisement or its housing will be corrected within forty-eight (48) hours. " Advertising treatments (housings) will complement the architecture of the transit centers/stations and the flavor of the surrounding community. Commission plan specifications will be followed wherever applicable. Advertising treatments will be designed, constructed, and placed in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal standards. 20 " " " Any unsold transit center, major transit points, and station display advertising space will be allocated for graphics and/or nonrevenue-producing functions approved by the Executive Director or his/her designee. At least one full display panel per transit center and station will be reserved exclusively for transit -related items. " Naming rights for specific transit stations or parts of stations may be negotiated and sold at the discretion of the Executive Director. Such naming rights treatments and formats will be designed, constructed, and placed in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal standards. " Advertising space may be allowed in printed materials (e.g., timetables, maps, and informational brochures) at the discretion of the Executive Director or his/her designee. " No advertising space shall supersede necessary transit information and/or regulations. " At the discretion of the Executive Director or his/her designee, Commission may allocate space in printed materials to inform transit customers about private entities actively participating in trans services, e.g., pass and ticket -sales outlets. " Advertising vendors shall maintain all commercial advertising for which they have contracted to display on Commission properties. 6. Commission's Right of Rejection The Commission reserves the right to reject any advertisement on the stated grounds as set forth in these Guidelines. Any advertisement or other display deemed to be objectionable will be removed. No refund shall be made for the time such objectionable material was on display. Commission's vendors may review advertising content according to their own guidelines of acceptability and generally Commission will not screen individual ads submitted to its vendors prior to posting unless specifically requested to do so by vendors. Nevertheless, in all advertising vendor contracts awarded, Commission reserves the right to reject any advertising content submitted for display on its properties and/or to order the removal of any advertising posted on its properties. Decisions regarding the rejection or removal of advertising shall be made by the Executive Director or his/her designee based upon the criteria in these Guidelines. 21 7. Informational Advertising • Commission has several unique distribution channels at its disposal for disseminating transit information that incurs no "space" cost (no fee charged for advertising space). These distribution channels include, but are not limited to: newsletter racks at Commission stations, bulletin boards and cases at select Commission Rail stations. In addition, Commission shall have use of an allotment of advertising space -at no charge by agreement with any vendor that sells all remaining advertising space under revenue generating agreements. Acceptable information for these distribution channels is categorized as follows: a. Regular Transit Information Regular transit -oriented information is prepared by Commission and operators as well as upon request from other internal departments. Regular transit information includes, but is not limited to: service features and changes, fare information and changes, safety and security messages, maps and explanations of related transportation services. b. Cross -Promotional Information On an occasional basis and only when space is available, Commission may use its distribution channels to participate in cross -promotional opportunities that offer a direct opportunity to promote the public use of transit. Any materials distributed for this purpose must prominently include promotion of multimodal services (i.e. Rideshare, Commuterlink). Commission is prohibited by law from simply donating advertising space to any entity for purposes that are not directly transit -related. The outside organization involved must either bear the cost of producing such materials or, if approved by Commission, provide an equivalent or greater value in cross -promotional benefits (i.e. advertising space, editorial space, etc.). Any cross -promotional arrangement must be approved by the Executive Director or his/her designee based upon the criteria in these Guidelines. c. "Added Value" Materials On an occasional basis and only when space is available, Commission may use available distribution channels to provide "added value" materials to its customers. Such materials must present a specific and time -dated offer uniquely provided for station patrons (generally a money - saving discount) in which transit can be used to access the redemption point. Any materials distributed for this purpose must prominently include the Commission logo and other wording approved by Commission to indicate that the offer is specifically designed for Commission and transit operator customers. Commission is prohibited by law from simply donating advertising space to any entity for purposes that are not directly transit -related. • 22 The outside organization involved must either bear the cost of producing such materials or, if approved by Commission, provide an equivalent or greater value in cross -promotional benefits (i.e. advertising space, editorial space, etc.). Any added value programs must be approved by the Executive Director or his/her designee based upon the criteria in these Guidelines. D. COMMISSION RESPONSIBILITIES Commission may engage contractor(s) services for the development, implementation, management, and maintenance of advertising, concessions, and/or merchandise programs in conformance with existing Board policies and in the best interests of the Commission. Commission prepares all information messages and materials for dissemination at stations: administers the distribution/display of transit information; tracks/coordinates the availability and use of Commission's unique information distribution channels. Executive Director (or designee) shall review and approve/reject all cross promotions and added value programs using Commission's unique distribution channels based upon the criteria in these Guidelines; enforces Commission's right to reject and/or order removal of commercial advertising based upon the criteria in these Guidelines. Effective Date: Date of Last Review: 23 " " " EXHIBIT "B" INCIDENTAL USE POLICY Any incidental use of Commission owned facilities and property will not exceed that permitted under applicable Federal laws or regulations in accordance with ap icable Federal directives. This Policy shall permit staff to use these facilities and property for -incidental uses including revenue generating purposes so long as these activities do not interfere with the Commission's primary public transportation operations' and responsibilities. These new programs will supplement existing revenues generated from current fare rates and non -operating subsidies. A. Concessions Concession formats, quantity, and placement will be approved and controlled by the Executive Director or his/her designee. Acceptable concession formats may include: short-term rental services (i.e., videos, bicycles, beach or sports equipment), automated teller machines (ATMs), State Lottery vending machines, personal service facilities (i.e., laundry drop-off and pick-up, car detailing), beverage carts, snack or beverage vending machines, and kiosks/shops for the sale of general merchandise, newspapers, magazines, sundries, prepaid transit fares, transit related merchandise, and rider convenience items approved by the Commission. Any additional concession formats are subject to approval of the Executive Director or his/her designee. Contracts for any concession format or related development will be awarded in accordance with existing Commission policies. During hours of business, concessionaires will provide the public with transit information materials as directed and supplied by Commission or its designated representative. Concession treatments/structures will be designed to complement the architecture of the transit centers/stations and the flavor of the surrounding community. Commission plan specifications will be followed wherever applicable. Concession treatments/structures will be designed, constructed, and placed in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal standards. Concession treatments/structures will not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic, will not restrict the visibility of directional signs and informational materials, and will not encroach on necessary sight lines. Concessionaire contracts will include remittance to Commission or its designated operating vendor: Said remittance will be made monthly or quarterly and include a flat rate or a percentage of gross revenue, as approved by the Commission. Any and all concession on -site signing and displays will be in accordance with existing Commission policies and subject to approval of the Executive Director or his/her designee. B. Merchandise Any and all system -related merchandise will be of the quality that is generally available in the surrounding retail environment and will project a positive Commission transit image. 24 Merchandise licensing agreements and royalty payments will be made in accordance with contemporary Commission practices and in the best interests of the Commission. C. Contractor Services Commission may engage contractor(s) services for the developmenf,..implementation, management, and maintenance of advertising, concessions, and/or merchandlYe programs in conformance with existing Board policies and in the best interests of the Commission. Effective Date: Date of Last Review: • • 25 Policy Intent • New revenue source to offset declining sales tax revenues and increasing station maintenance costs • Provide a clear policy and guidelines for the implementation of advertising • Ensure Commission support of new marketing approach Policy Guidelines • Commission Property and Rail Right of Way —Stations • Safety, aesthetics, convenience will be maintained • Commission will control quantity, quality and placement of all advertising • Maintains right for review and reject ads Policy Guidelines • Advertising Options — Dedicated map cases/sign —Banners — Vending Machine Shelters —Electronic Signage — Fixed Outdoor Displays Policy Guidelines • Viewpoint neutral content based • Advertising of alcohol and tobacco is prohibited • Must be in good taste -Cannot promote illegal activity - No obscene language - No discriminatory images - No political ads Incidental Use Policy • Need policy for Federally Funded Stations • Allows Concessions such as: - Vending Machines -Bicycle Rentals - Beverage Carts -Newspaper Racks • All vendors must comply with policy terms RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 28, 2010 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Fina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director SUBJECT: Riverside County Transit Services Funding Allocation for Fiscal Year 2010/11 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Conduct a public hearing at the July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the FY 2010/11 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2010/11 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP); 5) Adopt Resolution No. 10-025, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds"; and 6) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year, through the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) process, transit operating and capital subsidies consisting of federal, state, and local revenues are allocated to eight transit operators providing public transportation in Riverside County. At its June 9, 2010 meeting, the Commission approved the FY 2010/11 - FY2012/13 SRTPs in concept for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, Riverside, the Commission's Commuter Rail Program, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA), Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); and SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine). The SRTPs identify each agency's operating and capital needs, funding sources, consolidated financial plan, and provide the framework required to comply with federal regulations, the Transportation Development Act (TDA), state law, and Commission -adopted guidelines and policies. The SRTPs, which are updated annually, provide a three-year outlook for service improvements, planning activities, and capital programs. As the transportation planning agency, the Commission is responsible for allocation of transit funds, performance monitoring, and operator oversight. The approved SRTPs provide the basis for the Commission's oversight Agenda Item 10 26 activities to help establish system policy, determine appropriate service goals, and provide management with the necessary information to efficiently operate bus and rail services in the county. In January 2010, the Commission received information on the FY 291O/11 revenue projections, which indicated a decrease of approximately 11 % in LTF and 4% in Measure A funding compared to the FY 2009/10 original estimates:- Faced with significant reductions in both state and local sales tax revenues, Commission staff directed the transit operators to prepare a prudent spending plan aimed at decreasing operating budgets by at least 15%. Several measures were considered by the operators that included trimming of unproductive services, fare increases, streamlining of administrative expenses, and staff reductions, as well as reprogramming of carryover funds from previous years. Through various combinations of the above -referenced cost cutting measures, the reduction target was achieved and is reflected by a system -wide drop in LTF expenditures of approximately 15.1 %. The reduction has also benefited from the additional use of previously unidentified federal Section 5307 funds, as well as carryover funds from other federal grants including Sections 5316 and 5317 and excess funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) stimulus program. Resulting from these measures, staff has been able to limit the draw against on -hand LTF reserves to 2%. Careful analysis and consideration was made to evaluate every feasible option with the least impact on the core services that each operator provides, and the plans are based on conservative baseline budget estimates that operators can realistically and reasonably expect to receive from known revenue sources. Operations are now more closely aligned with available revenues. SRTP Financial and Ridership Overview Based on submitted SRTPs for FY 2010/11, it is estimated that $157 million in funding is required to support the operating and capital requests for the provision of Riverside County transit services. The following table provides an overview of the operating and capital costs together with projected ridership levels by apportionment area. Agenda Item 10 • 27 " " " Operating Capital Table 1 - FY 2010/11 Operating, Capital and Ridership Projections Western Riverside Coachella Palo Verde Valley -Valley- Total Bus I Rail $ 56,996,022 $ 11,563,900 $ 21,324,379 $ 829,369 $ 90,713,670 7,121,871 18,410,272 8,909,416 322,005 34,763,564 Total (Oper & Capital) 64,117,893 29,974,172 30,233,795 1,151,374 125,477,234 Leverage of Commuter Rail Funds* GRAND TOTAL 31,475,500 31,475,500 $64,117,893 " $61,449,672 $30,233,795 $1,151,374 $156,952,734 FY10/11'Projected Ridership 8,119,172 2,939,639 3,715,891 43,545 14,818,247 * LA Metro, OCTA & SANBAG's share and passenger fare revenues for Commuter Rail Expenses Although the operators designed their respective plans to reduce spending with minimum effect on transit service, the overall economic climate will continue to impact ridership. Attachment 4 of this report shows the funding plan for FY 2010/11 will generate approximately 14.8 million in ridership, about 3% lower than this year's projected ridership. Funding levels for next year's transit operations reflect a systemwide decrease of 4% in total operating expenses. With the elimination of STA funding since July 1, 2009, and without new STA funding in FY 2010/11, capital expenses were cut significantly by about 61 %. Last year's capital spending was largely funded by the ARRA program funds. For FY 2010/11, transit operators programmed their funding share of the Proposition 1 B FY 2008/09 funds, which were awarded and released this year. FY 2010/11 Operating and Capital Costs To implement the SRTPs for FY 2010/11, the request is to utilize approximately $90.7 million for operating and $34.8 million for capital in addition to the $31.5 million share from Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to leverage the Commuter Rail Program. The chart below provides an overview of the operating and capital costs by funding source required to provide transit services in Riverside County: Agenda Item 10 28 RIVERSIDE COUNTY: FY 2010/11 OPERATING and CAPITAL COSTS TDA (LTF & STA Funds), $49,954,785 , 32% Carry Over Funds (LTF/STA/5307, $6,770,222, 4% Addll Rail Operating Subsidy paid by SAN BAG, OCTA & LA Metro, $17,506,800 , 11% Other Revenues, $1,704,324, 1% Measure A, $11,054,350 , 7% Federal Formula Funds (Sec 5W & 5311), $30,01$;354 , 19% Passenger Fares, $26,739,077 , 17% Federal -Discretionary Funds (Sec 5309), $2,150,000, 1% Prop 1 B (Cap+Security), $10,352,539 , 7% Sec 5316 & 5317, $707,283,1% PASSENGER FARES PUMe Bus $12,770,377 Commuter Rai = S13.968 700 TOTAL c S26,739,077 Of the $156.9 million operating and capital costs identified in the chart approximately $52.7 million (33.6%) is derived from: • Passenger fares; • Commuter rail member agencies' revenue share; • Carryover funds (LTF/STA/Proposition 1 B/5307/5316/5317/ARRA); and • Miscellaneous other revenues (bus shelter advertising, TRIP revenue, Metrolink transfer fares, interest income, etc.). The remaining balance of approximately $104 million (66.4%) consists of federal, state, and local funds (including Proposition 1 B funding) that are allocated through Commission action. Transportation Development Act Funding The TDA provides two funding sources namely: LTF and STA. The 'LTF funds are derived from 'IA cent of the state retail sales tax collected in each county. The State Board of Equalization returns the sales tax revenues to the county of Riverside through the Commission where it is held until the Commission provides written allocation instructions for disbursement. It is estimated that LTF revenue for transit services for FY 2010/1 1 will be $49,101,136, an 11 % decrease compared to the original projected amount for FY 2009/10, and is consistent with the revenue projection provided at the January 2010 Commission meeting. Agenda Item 10 • 29 " " " The STA is derived from sales tax on gasoline and diesel fuel. Fifty percent of STA funds are allocated according to population. The other 50% is allocated according to the ratio of the total public transit revenues generated in each area during the prior fiscal year. In March 2009, the STA funding for transit was completely eliminated by the state. There is approximately $5.4 million in STA unallocated reserve funds projected at the end of FY 2009/10, and only $5,73Q; of this fund balance will be utilized by Palo Verde Valley for a capital project iri _FY 2010/11. Prior to approving the STA allocations, the Commission must adopt the attached resolution as specified in the TDA statutes and California Code of Regulations. In addition to that required by TDA, the Commission also adopted revised policies in March 2010 for the FY 2010/11 budget. These policies require all operators to spend down existing capital balances prior to requesting additional funds. This policy will ensure that projects are either completed or the funds reprogrammed, providing for the most efficient use of existing capital funds. The Commission must allocate funds to support the transit services and capital projects contained in the FY 2010/11 SRTPs in order for the public transit operators to claim LTF and/or STA funds. The requested allocations are consistent with the approved SRTPs, and the funds are explicitly for the projects stated in the approved plans. The TDA allocations for FY 2010/11 requested by each operator are outlined in Attachment 3. FY 2010/11 Federal Funding Requests: Sections 5307, 5309, 5311, 5316 and 5317 Section 5307 Formula Funds There are four urbanized areas (UZA) in Riverside County that receive federal operating and capital grant funding through FTA's Section 5307 program. " Riverside/San Bernardino; " Hemet/San Jacinto; " Temecula/Murrieta; and " Indio/Cathedral City/Palm Springs. Attachment 2 is the proposed Section 5307 POP for Riverside County. The Commission must develop and approve a POP for each UZA and conduct a public hearing prior to an operator submitting its Section 5307 grant application to FTA. If the draft POP is not amended through the public hearing process, the POP will become final as presented and will be included in an approved RTIP, which is subsequently forwarded to the Southern California Association of Governments for review and processing. The Section 5307 requested funds shown below include the Section 5307 Riverside -San Bernardino UZA and $177,288 of Section 5307 Los Angeles/Long Beach/Santa Ana UZA funds allocated to the Commission's Regional Commuter Rail Program. Agenda Item 10 30 FY 2010/11 Section 5307 Requested Funds City of Riverside Special Services $ 240,000 RTA 15, 691., 726 The Commission's Regional Commuter Rail 11,224,700 SunLine 2,164,804 TOTAL $ 29,321,230 The actual Section 5307 apportionments for FY 2010/11 will not be known until later this calendar year when final appropriations are made by Congress. The POP was developed at the highest anticipated funding amount to allow the operators to proceed with their grant applications and to avoid delays associated with program amendments should the actual apportionments come in lower than estimated. Any excess funds will be carried over to the subsequent fiscal year and will be made available to cover future projects. Section 5309 Discretionary Funds This is a discretionary pool of federal funds designated for public transit operators to purchase replacement or expansion buses and improve facilities. RTA and SunLine have identified projects totaling $2.150 million in Section 5309 discretionary funds for FY 2010/11 programming. RTA's FY 2010/11 earmark project includes procurement of three 40-foot revenue vehicles for replacement. SunLine's Section 5309 earmark will fund additional paratransit vehicles to expand demand response service. The projects must be included in an approved RTIP before the operators can access these funds. FY 2010/11 Section 5309 Earmarks RTA $1,400,000 SunLine 750,000 TOTAL $2,150,000 Section 5311 Formula and Discretionary Funds The FTA Section 5311 program administered by Caltrans is designed to provide financial assistance to eligible local public transportation providers in rural areas and communities with a population of less than 50,000. The majority of funds are passed through to counties based on a population formula. Any remaining funds are awarded in a statewide discretionary program by Caltrans for rural capital projects and intercity bus programs. This year's program was prepared using the FY 2009/10 funding level for transit operations since the actual apportionments will not be known until the final appropriations are released. By programming at Agenda Item 10 • 31 " " " what may be the same level of funding, the operators will be able to apply for maximum funding and avoid delays to amend their programs. The program allocates $692,124 in formula funds for Riverside County, of which 61.7% will be allocated to RTA and 38.3%, for SunLine. As in .previous years, both RTA and SunLine identified the use of Section 5311 fornUa funds for operating. The 61.7%/38.3% formula was approved by the Commission in 1987, and was based on the level of service each agency operated in the non-UZA of the county. Next year, the split will be evaluated with the possible inclusion of Palo Verde Valley to share this non-UZA funding. The Commission must develop and approve a Section 5311 POP before grants are approved. FY 2010/11 Section 5311 Requested Funds Agency RTA SunLine TOTAL Section 5316 & 5317 Formula Funds Amount $ 427,041 265,083 $ 692,124 % Allocation 61.7% 38.3% 100% Authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act, a Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), two recent federal programs, namely Section 5316 - Job Access Reverse Commute (JARC) and Section 5317  New Freedom (NF), were established to meet the transportation needs of low- income population, welfare recipients, and persons with disabilities. All projects funded under this program must be derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit -human services transportation planning process. RTA, SunLine, and PVVTA were awarded FY 2007 and 2008 JARC and NF funding and programmed these funds for FY 2009/10 and FY 2010/11. For FY 2010/11, funding allotments are utilized as follows: RTA SunLine PVVTA TOTAL Section 5316-JARC $ 473,160 134,772 52,489 $ 660,421 Section 5317-NF $ 6,232 23,134 17,496 $ 46,862 These funds will be used to cover expenses for RTA's Commuter Link 212 and 217 and extended fixed route services, SunLine's extended late night service and PVVTA's mobility management program. Agenda Item 10 32 Staff recommendation is to approve the TDA and FTA funds as presented. Any modifications in farebox revenues, federal grants, Measure A funding or carryover funds may require operators to revise their services to operate within the available funding. Fiscal Impact The funding allocations are based on the revenue estimates developed for the FY 2010/11 Commission budget. The budget adopted at the June 9 Commission meeting included $52.573 million in LTF transit operating expenditures, $4.789 million in LTF transit capital expenditures and $5,839,500 in STA capital expenditures. These budgeted expenditures, which include use of prior year capital allocations, are expected to be funded by FY 2010/11 revenues, as well as available fund balances. Based on these recommended allocations, no budget adjustments are required. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2010/11 Amount: $49,949,055 (LTF) $ 5,730 (STA) Source of Funds: TDA: LTF and STA Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE Western County Bus Palo Verde Valley 601 62 86101 P2210 $ 28,785,380 Western County Rail 241 62 86102 P2203 $ 5,730 601 62 86101 P2213 $ 11,177,400 Coachella Valley 601 62 86101 P2211 $ 9,314,807 Palo Verde Valley 601 62 86101 P2212 $ 671,468 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 06/16/10 Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 10-025 2) Section 5307 Program of Projects 3) TDA Spreadsheets (LTF and STA) 4) FY 2010/2011 and FY 2009/10 Operating and Capital Requests and Ridership Projections Agenda Item 10 • • 33 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 10-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO ALLOCATE STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission is designated the regional entity responsible for the allocation of State Transit Assistance Funds within Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission has examined the Short Range Transit Plans and Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, all proposed expenditures in Riverside County are in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, the level of passenger fares is sufficient for claimants to meet the fare revenue requirements of Public Utilities Code Sections 99268.2, 99268.3, 99268.4, 99268.5, and 99268.9, as applicable; and WHEREAS, the claimant is making full use of federal funds available under the Federal Transit Act; and WHEREAS, the sum of the claimant's allocations from the state transit assistance fund and from the local transportation fund does not exceed the amount the claimant is eligible to receive during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, priority consideration has been given to claims to offset reductions in federal operating assistance and the unanticipated increase in the cost of fuel, to enhance existing public transportation services, and to meet high priority regional, countywide, or area -wide public transportation needs; and WHEREAS, the public transit operators have made a reasonable effort to implement the productivity improvements recommended pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 99244; and WHEREAS, the claimant is not precluded by any contract entered into on or after June 28, 1979, from employing part-time drivers or contracting with common carriers or persons operating under a franchise or license; and WHEREAS, operators are in full compliance with Section 18081.1 of the Vehicle Code, as required in Public Utilities Code Section 99251. 34 ATTACHMENT 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission to allocate State Transit Assistance Funds for FY 2010/11 as detailed in Attachment 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its .passage. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14' day of July, 2010. Bob Buster, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 35 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2010/11 URBANIZED AREA: RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO Total Apportionment (Projected based on prior year actuals) Bus Rail Tb al ATTACHMENT Page 1 of 4 Apportionment $10,325,443 $4,734,551 $15,059,994 Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover $5.809,797 $6,548,389 $12,358,186 Total Funds Available $16,135,240 $11,282,940 $27,418,180 Less Current Requests $10.348,139 $11,047 412 $21,395,551 Balance (Projected) $5,787,101 $235,528 $6,022,629 Sub Area Allocation Riverside, City of $240,000 Riverside Transit Agency $10,108,139 RCTC's Commuter Rail $11,047,412 TOTAL $21,395,551 NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED TOTAL AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT Riverside, City of 1) Preventive Maintenance $ 300,000 $ 240,000 Capital/Operating SCAG TOTAL: City of Riverside $ 300,000 $ 240,000 Riverside Transit Agency 2) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance $ 7,834,494 $ 6,267,595 Capital/Operating SCAG 3) Capital Cost of Contracting $ 6,627,599 $ 3,840,544 Capital SCAG TOTAL: Riverside Transit Agency $ 14,462,093 $ 10,108,139 RCTC's Commuter Rail 4) SCRRA Rehab/Renovation - FY 11 RCTC's share $ 1,224,700 $ 1,224,700 Capital SCAG 5) Perris Valley Line (FY 10/11) $ 10,000,000 $ 9,822,712 Capital SCAG TOTAL: RCTC Rail $ 11,224,700 $ 11,047,412 TOTAL: GRAND TOTAL $ 25,986,793 $ 21,395,551 Approved: 7/14/10 (Pending) • V:1JCIemente153071POP1Riv-San Bernardino1011.xls 36 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 20010/11 URBANIZED AREA: HEMET/SAN JACINTO RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Projected based on prior year actuals) Apportionment $1,884,601 Carryover (estimate) $1,558,831 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) $0 Total Funds Available $3,443,432 Less Current Requests $2,014,134 Balance (Projected) $1,429,298 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $ 23,108,099 $ 1,750,000 Operating Caltrans 2) Capitalized Tire Lease $ 260,907 $ 208,726 Capital Caltrans 3) Maintenance Equipment $ 64,260 $ 51,408 Capital Caltrans 4) Facility Maintenance $ 5,000 $ 4,000 Capital Caltrans TOTAL: $ 23,438,266 $ 2,014,134 Approved: 7/14/10 (pending) V:1JCIemente15307\POP\Hemet - San Jacinlo UZA10-11.xls 37 ATTACHMENT Page 3 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2010/11 URBANIZED AREA: INDIO/CATHEDRAL CITY/PALM SPRINGS RECIPIENT: SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Projected based on prior year actuals) Apportionment $3,533,405 Lapsing Funds (per FTA) $o Carryover $o Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) $o Total Funds Available $3,533,4o5 Less Current Requests $2,164,804 Balance (Projected) $1,368,601 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $19,449,379 $924,804 Operating SCAG 2) Bus Rehabilitation $300,000 $240,000 Capital SCAG 3) Transit Enhancement $300,000 $240,000 Capital SCAG 4) Facility Improvement $450,000 $360,000 Capital SCAG 5) Office Furniture $300,000 $240,000 Capital SCAG 6) Maintenance Tools & Equipment $200,000 $160,000 Capital SCAG TOTAL: $20,999,379 $2,164,804 Approved: 7/14/10 (pending) V:1JCIemente153071POPllndio-Coachella-P Springs 10-11.xls 38 ATTACHMENT Page 4 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2010/11 URBANIZED AREA: TEMECULA/MURRIETA RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Projected based on prior year actuals) Apportionment Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available Less Current Requests Balance (Projected) NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS 1) Capital Cost of Contracting 2) Revenue Vehicles Type VII buses 3) Capital Maintenance Spares TOTAL: Approved: 7/14/10 (pending) TOTAL AMOUNT $ 6,627,599 $ 968,750 $ 1,666,147 $9,262,496 $3,096,309 $0 $3,569,454 $0 $6,665,763 $3,569,453 $3,096,310 FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT $ 1,461,535 $ 775,000 $ 1,332,918 $3,569,453 Operating Capital Capital SCAG SCAG SCAG V:1JCIemente153071POP1Temecula-Murrieta 10-11.xls 39 0-b o 40Z/91/9 sxilysuopeooIN V1S 9 All 1141.0Z AA *stew 608e/000 40 wells 0,01Md 0! 006`£99` l4$'lunowe 011110 'diN9 to q a!gel MIN 0'£4$16 palewgsa a/e stem 600ewado s,l!ea Jamue000 $ 990 646 64 $ SSO'6b6'64 $ 6LL'8ZS'SL $ 4£Z`LLVSZL $ 499'£9L'17£ $ 019`£LL`06 $ 1V10130IM AIM100 • 894'149 994'129 906'6L4 4LE'L91.'I. 9001Z£ 69£`6Z8 A3l1VA30i3AOlVd:1V101 894'LL9 F.1, 994'LL9 906'6L4 4L£'L9t'L 900`ZZ£ 69£'6Z9 Aouebyl!sumi/talloAap/aAoled - L08'4L£'s L09bL£`6 996`914'0Z 96L'C£Z'0£ 914'606'9 6L£'42£'12 A311VA V113H3V00 :1V101 - LOW4L£'6 LO9'41.£`6 996'91.6'0Z 96L'EEZ'OE 914'606'9 6LE'4ZE'lZ Aoua6yl!sue/1 eununS • 004'LLL'LL 004'LLVIL ZLL'96L91. ZLV4L6'6Z ZLZ`01.4`81. 006'992'1.1. .11Vaa31nWW00 • 301S213/LIN N213133M :1V101 - 004`LLVLL 004'LLL'LL ZLL'96L'9L ZLL'4L6'6Z ZLZ"Ol4'81. 006'099'4t (5w!o-0aw)!!e8Jelnwwoos,oloy - 08E18V8Z 09E181"9Z ELS'ZEE'SE E68'LLL'49 1.2.9'121.'L ZZO'966'99 sn9-301Sa3AINNa31S3M:1V101 - - - - Z99'496'ZZ 12.£`1.61.'Z 062'000'4 000'81.0'I. $ L£0'890't $ Z99'1.96'ZZ 69L'999'LE La' L6L'Z 000'990`Z 06L'999'l 664'9£L 000'SLO'I. Z99'L6£ L£0'990'4 $ £691.84 L44'81.9'49 490'Z99'4 LLE'L4Z'q 000'OOS'I. 69Z'Z6Z'Z Z99'L4£ Z99'604'L Z99'69Z $ 0£Z'090'1, $ £69'Z9£ $ LLE'996'64 LL£'L4L2 LEL'446'L 000'04L'L L£9'L64'l $ Aouaby lisue/l ep!s/aA!a seovuesIe!0adgeppania euaoo4040 luowneag Jo Apo 6u!uueg 10 40 44/040ZAA 44/0 OZ AA L/0� S311413A38 S1S00 S19001V118V3 919000NI14213d0 V3aV1N3WN011a0ddVlAON39V spund Mae* All spund ou!lelaa0 All NOA SNOIlV00114 All NON a31VINLLS3 1tl101 a31VWLLS3 031VINI1S3 0314161193 11 NtlL . All 030N3WW003t1 SCINI1A NOIlVlNOdSNVNI TV001 SNOI1V0011V 11SNV211 641060Z A3 ONIONn3 13V 1N31A1d073A3O NOI1V1210dSNV%11 NOISSIWW00 NOI1V1210dSNVN1 A1Nf100 33IS213AI8 Z 10 I. (Zed £ 1N3 WHOt/11 d • • " OLOZ/ slxl-IVS00le0011yV1S 8dll LL-0LOZAd 41/040ZAd LLIOLOZAA spund spund lellde0 V1S &mend� V1S " 0E1'9 $ $ 0E1'9 0�L'S 0�L'S 0�L'4 LNOLOZAd SONN &LSO�1V11dV0 S1S00 HOd SNOI1V00TIV HMO A2121V0 V1S 031VWI1S3 ONI1043d0 11SNV211 V1S V18 031VWI1S3 V1S 031VINI1S3 030N3WW00321 WW1301M A1Nf100 A311VA 30213A 01Vd :1V101 lSoua6y lisue.l Aa11eA apaaA (Died A311VA V113H3V00 1V101 kua6y psue.1 eununS ipm 2I31f1WW00 - 301S213A121 N2131S3M 1V101 (NullailaW) lied Jalnwwo0 s,OlOd Sf18 - 301S213A121 N2131S3M :1V101 Apue6y psuml aplsiaAN seowag ieloads apiSJanld euaoo y(D Apo luowneag to APO 6uluueg to ��110 V321V 1N INNOI1210ddV/A0N3OV saNnd 3ON`d1SISSV 11SN`d2i131V1S SNOLLVOO17d liSNb41l 44/040Z Ad ONIONfId 10'd 1N31Ald013A30 N0I1V1210dSNb2L1 NOISSIWW00 NOLLV.L iOdSNb211 A1Nf100 301S213AIU Z Jo Z �Bed �11+131A1HOVIIV Zt •iseA snolneid mu; spun; jenoLueo VaavLLIC9/91£9/L005/91. dad/Alin/19 ul ZZZ'0LL'9$ sepnloul woo 1e3o3 LL/OL02 Ad 2 010N •0Ll6lg uo uolsslwwo0 eqt Aq penadde eununs pue Vla'Ilsa 0108 woy nsenbeo Alas pepuewe Ue09m seAnOu OL/80 Ad :L 030N 100L'896'CL$) anuene3 zoom; Ilea pus (008'90S'LL$) Nona ' Aeupod 11104 Aplsgns Supeoado leuomppe ul mop not Appouoxo.idde sold uo0llw 9'L 3 Amewlxadde Lo mays tam ammo woo a,llek! Ja3nwwo0, %L4'92- 81.1,192'6L2 f 4£L'Z9V9S1 $ :ppol ne0paul % 008'Z66've $ 009`SL4'L£ $ OLl60 Ad LLlOI Ad ,spun] Ilea Ja3nwwo0;o el3ewenei %LO'£- £88'LLe91 i4Z'81.8141. %06'LE- 9L9`99Z'481. $ 4£Z'LL4'9ZG $ %9Z'49- £Z6`6£L'68 $ 49S'£9L17£ $ %£0'4- SSL'819'46 $ 0L9'£LL'06 $ V31:IV11V:1V1.01 %I* Z %46'0 4Z4 Z4 4Z4'Z4 £ZZ' 499'E £ZZ't99'£ 969'£4 469'94L'£ 169'9Let %OE'OZ %0E'OZ %96'OZ %96'OZ 690 LS6 690'L96 9£4'966'4Z 9E4'S66'4Z 4L£ 1.91. L 4L£' 4S 4' 4 96L ££Z 0£ SBL'££Z'0£ %LZ 906 %LZ 906 %9L'89L %9 L'99 L 000'ZE 8Z8 L60'£ 9Z8'460'E SOO ZZ£ SOO'ZZ£ 9 L4'606 8 9l4'606's %SE"0 L- %SE 04 690 SZ6 690'9Z6 019 £06' LZ OL9'£06'll 69£ 6E9 69V6Z9 6L£'4Z£'LZ 6LE'4Z£'LZ %6Z'4- 9£Z 499 L L L t8 890 L t %99 04- LL l'90E 994 990 Z60 46 96Z9"OL- 460 91.9 98 £41, Z£S'SZ %LE 4- 9L0 069 LL ZZ6 6$999 V101 4.311VA 30aan OIVd Aoua6V gsueJl AelleA 90I9A oled V101 :A3T1VA V113H0V00 We 9 sne V101 AlNfl00 Na3193M %L60 61.6'4l6'Z 6E9'6£8'Z %9Z'1.9- LEL'99£'LL ZLLbL6'6d %9Z'ZL- LEL'9L£'99 ZLZ'OL4'9L %8Z'9 009'£96'04 006'£99'L4 Ilea :ALunoO u;a4sem %909- LL6'Z49'9 ZLL'6L4'9 %6L'OZ- b£4'L46'09 £69'LI. L'49 %L9'49- 996'OVZ'OZ 419'LZL'L %LL 9- 9Lb'90L'09 ZZO'956'99 sne :A;unoo we;seM %Ltr'9- L99'Z66'L 949'9L4'L %49'ZZ- 4EL'69L'OL L44'91.9'69 %9L'EL- 996'04L'LL 490'Z99'4 %499- 9L4'940'C9 LL£'996'84 Aoue vaplsJanla %00'0 L98'1.91. 998'L9l %L4'L- 964'SZ£'4 LL£'LVZ'4 %00'OZ 000'00Z'4 000'009 L %9L'0 L- 964'8L0'£ LL£'L4L'Z saowas lepads apls/only %9E'9- L8L'LZZ 041.'90Z %0£'S L- 484'90L'Z 68Z'Z8Z'Z %LO'Z4- 000'009 Z99'L4£ %99'L- 4S4'90 L'Z LEL'446'L euouo0;o A110 %4911 8Z9'6EL 099'L9L %9L'EZ- 009'949' L Z99604 L %E9.89- 000 099 %00.0 9171'LEL 94L'L£L %09'LZ ose'4LZ'L $ 0£Z'OSS'L $ Z99'69Z $ £69'Z9£ $ Joao/Jou! (cosw0s3) 01090e(ad) ;oe0poul. 01./60A4 LL/OL Ad L01/0Pou1 OL/BOAA LL/OLAA % 01/601A LNOL AA dIHSa301a 1S001V101 41N3INHOVllV 1V11dV0 %991,- 009'861.' 1. 000'041.' 1. LuoLunea8 40 A310 %90'9- 0S9'4LZ'L $ L£9'L64'4 $ 6uluueg;oAPO ioeanoul OL/60AA LL/OLAA 123LIV1N3WN011aOddV/A0N30V ONI1Va3d0 suonoeload aiysJoPIN pue %SOO je}itleo g Wilma() 04/600Z Ad I? 1.14040Z Ad ;o uospeciwo0 • • Budget and Implementation Committee June 28, 2010 FY 2010/11 Allocation of Funding for Riverside County Transit Services Short RangeTransit Plans FY 2010/11 — FY 2012/13 • Approved in concept: 6/09/10 - City of Banning - City of Beaumont - City of Corona - City of Riverside - Riverside Transit Agency - SunLine Transit Agency - Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency - RCTC Commission Commuter Rail Program State and Local Revenues Revenue Declines in FY 2010/11 • Local Transit Funds (LTF) - 11 % decrease • Measure A — 4 % decrease • STA eliminated by State Action Measures Considered: fare increases, staff reduction, streamline admin expenses, trim unproductive service, and use of carryover funds Result: Reduction Goal achieved: 15.1 % LTF reserve used: 2% Operating and Capital Costs Comparison: FY 08/09 - 10/11 in -E g i E 3 a 190,000 170,000 150,000 130,000 110,000 90,000 70,000 50,000 30,000 Operating Capital Total Cost 184,259 143,960 125,477 97,718 94,519 90,714 89,740 4b 241 34,764 _ FY 08/09 (Actual) FY 09/10 (Estimate) FY10/11 {Plan) FY 08/09 (Actual) FY 09/10 (Estimate( FY 10/11 (Plan) FY 08/09 (Actual) FY 09/10 (Estimate) FY 10/11 (Plan) RIVERSIDE COUNTY: FY 2010/11 OPERATING and CAPITAL COSTS TDA (LTF & STA Funds), $49,954,785 , 32% Carry Over Funds (LTF/STA/5307, $6,770,222 , 4% Addll Rail Operating Subsidy paid by SANBAG, OCTA & LA Metro, $17,506,800 , 11% Other Revenues , $1,704,324 , 1% Measure A, $11,054,350 , 7% Federal Formula Funds (Sec 5307 & 5311), $30,013,354 , 19% Passenger Fares, $26,739,077 , 17% Federal -Discretionary Funds (Sec 5309), $2,150,000 , 1% Prop 1 B (Cap+Security), $10,352,539 , 7% Sec 5316 & 5317, $707,283 , 1% PASSENGER FARES Public Bus = $12,770,377 Commuter Rail= $13.968,700 TOTAL = $26,739,077 AGENDA ITEM 11 " s " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 28, 2010 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee - FROM: Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager ,_ THROUGH: John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program II STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Authorize staff to apply for Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery II (TIGER II) Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) program for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvements Project (SR-91 CIP); 2) Authorize staff to support regionally significant projects nominated for TIGER II by members of the Southern California Consensus Group (SCCG), as appropriate; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Congress included $600 million in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 for national infrastructure investments. These funds are to be distributed on a competitive basis by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), with no more than 25% of the funds going to any one state. This discretionary grant program has been dubbed TIGER II by USDOT, taking the namesake of the original TIGER program, which was created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). However, TIGER li funds are not ARRA funds and thus do not have the same stringent time requirements that TIGER funds did. Eligibility for the program is very broad. Considering that over $32 billion in applications were submitted for TIGER, when only $1.5 billion was available, the competition for TIGER II is expected to be extraordinary. Law gives USDOT the authority to use up to $150 million of TIGER II funds for subsidies for the TIFIA program. TIFIA is a federal credit assistance program for projects of national and regional significance. Typically this program provides loans with favorable terms to project sponsors for infrastructure projects that have funding gaps and can provide a revenue stream to repay the loan. Generally, one Agenda Item 11 43 dollar of TIFIA subsidy from the federal government can leverage ten dollars of TIFIA loans. TIFIA assistance also sends positive signals to the investment market for the non-TIFIA portion of a project's financing package; federal backing is looked upon favorably. Aside from TIGER II, approximately $110 million per year is available for TIFIA subsidies. The SR-91 CIP will require approximately $410 million in TIFIA_--assistance to complete the financing package of this $1.3 billion project. Given that Commission staff will have to prepare a TIFIA application for SR-91 CIP within the next year to meet the project's schedule, staff is recommending an expedited process that would enable the Commission to also compete for the $150 million available for TIGER II TIFIA. Despite the extremely small size of TIGER II, the Commission's consultant team and staff are confident that the SR-91 CIP is of a magnitude that would make it competitive under the criteria designated by USDOT. Primary criteria are as follows: • Long-term outcomes; • Economic competitiveness; • State of good repair; • Livability; • Sustainability; • Safety; and • Jobs and economic stimulus. Secondary criteria are innovation and partnership. TIGER II TIFIA presents an opportunity with its cornerstone project from the 1 Delivery plan, but it is also a strategic process of gaining entry into the regular for the Commission to compete nationally 0-Year Western Riverside County Highway opportunity to get a jump on the rigorous TIFIA program. Commission staff and consultants will execute a proactive legislative effort to raise awareness of the SR-91 CIP TIFIA application and seek political support; this will back-up a technically sound and merit -based application. Commission staff will also seek support from neighboring transportation agencies that are impacted by the SR-91 CIP. Unlike many other projects that will be competing from California, SR-91 CIP will be seeking to leverage local funds measuring into the billions, rather than seeking pure grant funding. Additionally, staff seeks Commission direction to lend support to regionally significant projects nominated by members of the SCCG. While our regional partners are still vetting potential applications for TIGER II, it is possible that a few nominated projects will positively benefit Riverside County. Agenda Item 11 • • 44 State & Federal Legislative Update TIGER TIFIA II Budget & Implementation Committee June 28, 2010 The Waiting Game... • Sacramento = budget deadline missed - No signs of "getting closer" • Washington =authorization talks at stand -still through at least end -of -year - Revenue problem • FY 2011 Appropriations probably late Legislation • AB 1955 (De La Torre) —Incompatible offices -Creates new conditions that trigger incompatible offices unintended consequences -Discussions ongoing with Attorney General -STAFF Recommendation: OPPOSE • H.R. 891 // S.322 — Commuter Benefits - Equity between parking and transit subsidies - Current benefits expire this year - RCTC has previously supported - STAFF Recommendation: SUPPORT " $600 million  $150m for TIFIA subsidies (23`)/0)  $35m for planning grants (6`)/0)  No more than $150 to any one state  Broad eligibility  Competitive: projects selected by DOT  Nationally significant projects  Primary Criteria: long-term outcomes, economic competitiveness, "livability", jobs TIGER II (cont'd) • Comparison to TIGER I: - $1.5 billion available - $200 million for TIFIA (13%) - $32 billion in applications Only 4 projects in CA funded (incl. Colton Xing) - No state "maxed-out" LESS MONEY, MORE "CARVE OUTS" _ FEWER ODDS OF SUCCESS TIGER II (cont'd) SR-91 Corridor Improvements Project • Seek TIFIA subsidy • We will need it anyway — start competing now — Raise awareness of SR-91 in Washington • Project is of a scale that is nationally significant • Innovation and Partnership — Design -build, tolling, Orange County link TIGER II (cont'd) SR-91 Corridor Improvements Project • Staff recommendation: — Submit SR-91 for TIGER TIFIA II — Support regionally significant projects that benefit Riverside County AGENDA ITEM 12 " " RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 28, 2010 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee - FROM: Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager '; THROUGH: John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal Legislation; 2) Approve the following bill positions: a) AB 1955 (De La Torre)  OPPOSE; b) H.R. 891 (McGovern)  SUPPORT; c) S. 322 (Schumer)  SUPPORT; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: State Update To the surprise of no one, the Legislature has missed the constitutional deadline for passing a budget. The Budget Conference Committee has been meeting regularly to find savings and work through hundreds of recommendations. No major funding maneuvers for transportation are being contemplated after this year's tax swap. However, Commission staff, in concert with the Self -Help Counties Coalition, has been working to fight a proposal by the Department of Finance (DOF) and the Legislative Analyst Office (LAO) to shift the costs of planning initiation documents (PID) for transportation projects from Ca[trans to local agencies. The Commission has historically opposed all attempts by the state to shift cost burdens to the local level without compensation. At the time this report was written, it appeared that DOF and the LAO agreed to table the proposal in lieu of a study to determine the best way to manage the state's PID workload for future years. Aside from monitoring the budget, the Commission continues to work with local legislators and leadership in both chambers on design -build legislation for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvements Project. Agenda Item 12 45 AB 1955 (De La Torre): Incompatible offices - Staff Recommended Position: OPPOSE Current state law defines the holding of incompatible public offices and prescribes that an individual holding an incompatible office shall be removed from the first public office they hold upon assuming the second office. The intent of the law is to protect taxpayers and prevent public officials from simultaneously occupying offices that create an inherent conflict of interest. Offices are deemed incompatible in three circumstances: • Either of the offices may audit, overrule, remove members of, dismiss employees of, or exercise supervisory powers over the other office or body; • Based on the powers and jurisdiction of the offices, there is a possibility of a significant clash of duties or loyalties between the offices; or • Public policy considerations make it improper for one person to hold both offices. Existing law makes an exception when the holding of two offices is, "compelled or expressly authorized by state law." For example, Public Utilities Code Section 130053 expressly states that the Riverside County Transportation Commission shall consist of five members of the Board of Supervisors and one mayor or council member from each incorporated city within the county. Thus, a council member sitting on his/her own city council and the Commission is not deemed to be holding incompatible offices. AB 1955 (De La Torre) is a bill sponsored by the Los Angeles County District Attorney, who is prosecuting one of the first cases under the state's incompatible office law. The bill would add three additional circumstances that would create incompatible offices: • Both public entities in which the offices exist have the power of eminent domain in an area in which the geographic jurisdictions of each office or body overlap; • Either public entity in which an office exists has the power to set a fee or a rate or to impose a tax or a levy that may directly or indirectly affect the other office or body; or • Either public entity in which an office exists has the authority to investigate, monitor, or sue the other office or body. The Commission and all of the cities and the county whose membership comprise the Commission have the power of eminent domain in an overlapping geographic boundary, The Commission and each of its member jurisdictions also have the authority to sue each other. Although the protection remains for holding two offices expressly compelled by law, staff is concerned that the addition of these Agenda Item 12 46 " " " three circumstances creates ambiguity in the law that could expose all members of the Commission to legal vulnerability. Commissioners' service on the Commission and their city councils or the Board of Supervisors is not a conflict of interest, but in fact an expressly legal and widely accepted practice to ensure that all communities throughout Riverside County are represented on infrastructure issues. Furthermore, AB 1955 adds an express exemption from the new provisions of the bill for redevelopment authorities. The bill states that city councils and Boards of Supervisors that declare themselves to be redevelopment authorities shall not be deemed to hold an incompatible office. Although this is a logical declaration, by creating an explicit carve -out for one type of agency without mentioning the many other types of public agencies that should not be subject to the provisions of this bill such as transit boards, transportation commissions, air quality management districts, and councils of governments, one could question whether the legislative intent was to only exempt redevelopment authorities and not these other agencies. AB 1955 is opposed by the League of .California Cities, the California State Association of Counties, several water districts, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Commission staff is aware of several other transportation commissions that are preparing to register official opposition to the bill as well. While staff is confident that the author does not intend to create additional legal risk for entities such as the Commission, until such time that the bill is amended to remove the legal ambiguity currently written in the bill, staff recommends an oppose position on AB 1955 (De La Torre). Taking such a position will not compromise the Commission's commitment to maintaining the public's trust and the highest standard of professional ethics. Federal Update Major transportation news has been slowly emerging from Washington, D.C., in recent weeks. Near -term prospects for a long-term authorization bill continue to dim. The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico will likely spur Congress to act on energy legislation, which may or may not rope in climate change provisions. An energy bill may have implications for the transportation sector. If new revenue is raised from any type of fees on oil or gas production or consumption, it will be important for the transportation industry to lobby hard to ensure that such revenues are devoted to transportation purposes, given transportation's nexus to consumption of those products. Also, transit interests will need to remain vigilant that any plans to reduce energy consumption via public transportation come with commensurate funding for operations as well as capital. Agenda Item 12 47 H.R. 891 (McGovern) and S. 322 (Schumer): Commuter Benefits Equity Act of 2009 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) created temporary parity between the pre-tax benefits employers can provide for parking and for transit passes. Previously, employers could provide up to $175 per month to each employee in tax-free parking subsidies, but only $100 per month for -transit passes. As an incentive to encourage the use of transit, ARRA raised the allowable transit and parking subsidy to $230 per month through December 31, 2010. The companion bills H.R. 891 and S. 322 would make permanent this equity between parking and transit subsidies from employers, and tie the subsidy limit to inflation. Neither bill has received a hearing; it may be possible that these provisions are worked into a tax extenders package that Congress may pass soon. The Commission has supported the previous versions of this legislation that have been introduced in prior sessions of Congress. The bill has been supported by many transit operators throughout the country and the Commission's support is being requested by the Riverside Transit Agency. Commission staff recommends support for both companion bills. Agenda Item 12 • i 48