Loading...
07 July 14, 2010 Commission89513 RECORDS Rivera County Tro€ spodufion Commission MEETING AGENDA TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, July 14, 2010 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside lap COMMISSIONERS Res Chair - Bob Buster 1' Vice Chair - Greg Pettis 2nd Vice Chair - John J. Benoit Bob Buster, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside Jeff Stone, County of Riverside John J. Benoit, County of Riverside Marion Ashley, County of Riverside Bob Botts / Don Robinson, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / To Be Appointed, City of Blythe Ray Quint° / Jim Hyatt, City of Calimesa Mary Craton / Jordan Ehrenkranz, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City Eduardo Garcia / Steven Hernandez, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel / Steve Nolan, City of Corona Scott Matas / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs Robin Lowe / Eric McBride, City of Hemet Patrick J. Mullany / Larry Spicer, City of Indian Wells Glenn Miller / Ben Godfrey, City of Indio Terry Henderson / Don Adolph, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Melissa Melendez, City of Lake Elsinore Wallace Edgerton / Darcy Kuenzi, City of Menifee Bonnie Flickinger / Jesse Molina, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs / Randon Lane, City of Murrieta Malcolm Miller / Kathy Azevedo, City of Norco Richard Kelly / Jim Ferguson, City of Palm Desert Steve Pougnet / Ginny Foat, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Al Landers, City of Perris Ron Meepos / Scott Hines, City of Rancho Mirage Steve Adams / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Steve Di Memmo / Vacant, City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula Scott Farnam / Bridgette Moore, City of Wildomar Raymond Wolfe, Governor's Appointee Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. 11.36.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Wednesday, July 14, 2010 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waive this three minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Board should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda which are not listed on the agenda. Board members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 14, 2010 Page 2 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JUNE 9, 2010 6. PUBLIC HEARING — RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSIT SERVICES FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 1 1) Conduct a public hearing at the July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the FY 2010/1 1 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 531 1 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2010/11 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP); and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 10-025, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds". 7. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS - The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. if there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 8A. CLOSE-OUT AUDIT Page 18 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Compliance with Requirements Applicable to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Planning, Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Program, Project No. PPM 07-6054(044) report. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 14, 2010 Page 3 8B. FISCAL YEAR 2008/09 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT AND MEASURE A AUDIT RESULTS Page 24 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Measure A audit results report for the FY 2008/09. 8C. STATE ROUTE 91 TRAFFIC AND REVENUE STUDY SERVICES Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 33 1) Award Agreement No. 10-31-099-00 to Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) to provide an investment -grade traffic and revenue study for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP) for a base amount of $896,252, plus a contingency amount of $89,625, for a total not to exceed amount of $985,877; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work as may be required for the study. 8D. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ADVISOR SERVICES WITH KPMG CORPORATE FINANCE, LLC Page 45 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-66-026-08, Amendment No. 7 to Agreement 06-66-026-00, for toll feasibility and strategic partnership advisor services with KPMG Corporate Finance, LLC (KPMG) for the Interstate 15 Corridor Improvement Project (1-15 CIP) for the amount of $250,000; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 14, 2010 Page 4 8E. 2010 STATE ROUTE 91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN UPDATE Page 55 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2010 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. 8F. AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHSTAR ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH CALTRANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSTATE 215 WIDENING PROJECT FROM MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD TO SCOTT ROAD, NORTH OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA Page 88 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 10-31-079-00 to Southstar Engineering & Consulting, Inc. (Southstar) to perform construction management (CM) services, materials testing, and construction surveying for the 1-215 widening, Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road project, in the city of Murrieta, for the base amount of $4,097,564, plus a contingency amount of $402,436, for a total not to exceed amount of $4.5 million; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work as may be required for the project; 4) Approve the Cooperative Agreement No. 10-31-110-00 with Caltrans for construction of the project; and 5) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the cooperative agreement and future non -funding related amendments to this agreement. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 14, 2010 Page 5 8G. AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL FOR CONSTRUCTION ZONE ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM SERVICES FOR THE STATE ROUTE 74/INTERSTATE 215 INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITY OF PERRIS AND THE INTERSTATE 215 WIDENING PROJECT FROM MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD TO SCOTT ROAD, NORTH OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA Page 156 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 10-31-1 13-00 with the Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP) for Construction Zone Enhanced Enforcement Program (COZEEP) traffic control services during construction of the 74/215 interchange project in the city of Perris and the Interstate 215 widening project from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road, north of the city of Murrieta, for the amount of $285,978 plus a contingency amount of $28,622 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total not to exceed amount of $314,600; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. 8H. FISCAL YEARS 2011-15 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS Page 163 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the FYs 201 1-15 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) for Local Streets and Roads as submitted. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 14, 2010 Page 6 81. MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT BASE YEAR EXTENSION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 AND THE 2009 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES Page 165 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve using the 1989 Measure A Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base year amount for the FY 2010/1 1 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE certification; 2) For cities incorporated in or after 1989, excluding the cities of Menifee and Wildomar, approve using the Proposition 42 MOE amount for the FY 2010/11 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE certification; and 3) Approve the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE Guidelines. 8J. AGREEMENT WITH HDR ENGINEERING INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE PERRIS VALLEY LINE PROJECT Page 175 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 10-31-058-00 to HDR Engineering Inc. (HDR), to provide construction management (CM) services for the Perris Valley Line (PVL) project for a base amount of $15,950,146, plus a contingency amount of $1 .6 million, for a total not to exceed amount of $17,550,146; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work as may be required for the project; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute related utility and other local agency agreements necessary for the design and construction of the project. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 14, 2010 Page 7 8K. COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING POLICY AND CONTENT GUIDELINES, INCIDENTAL USE POLICY, AND NON-COMMERCIAL FREE SPEECH POLICY Page 287 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt a Commercial Advertising Policy and Content Guidelines, and Incidental Use Policy; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 10-01 1, uA Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Adopting a Commercial Advertising Policy and Content Guidelines, an Incidental Use Policy Covering Concession Stands, Merchandising, and Contractor Services for Commission -Owned Facilities and Property and a Revised Non -Commercial Free Speech Permit Policy". 8L. FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 AGREEMENTS FOR REGIONAL RIDESHARE SERVICES Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 305 1) Award Agreement No. 10-41-029-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 10-41-029-00, with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) as part of the Commission's continuing bi- county partnership with SANBAG to deliver commuter/employer rideshare services, regional ridematching services, and operation of an Inland Empire 511 system for FY 2010/11; 2) Award Agreement No. 07-41-1 15-02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 07-41-1 15-00, with Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and Agreement No. 06-41-082-05, Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. 06-41-082-00, with the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) for regional ridematching services; and 3) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 14, 2010 Page 8 8M. AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL FOR OPERATION OF THE CALL BOX SYSTEM Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 316 1) Approve Agreement No. 10-45-109-00 with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for the operation of the call box system for a three- year term, and one one-year option to extend the agreement in the amount of $15,900; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 8N. TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT GENERATING ECONOMIC RECOVERY II TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE AND INNOVATION ACT PROGRAM Page 324 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Authorize staff to apply for Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery II (TIGER II) Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) program for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP); and 2) Authorize staff to support regionally significant projects nominated for TIGER II by members of the Southern California Consensus Group (SCCG), as appropriate. 80. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 328 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal Legislation; 2) Approve the following bill positions: a) AB 1955 (De La Torre) — OPPOSE; b) H.R. 891 (McGovern) — SUPPORT; and c) S. 322 (Schumer) — SUPPORT. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 14, 2010 Page 9 9. MEASURE A BOND DEBT LIMIT INCREASE Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 332 1) Adopt Ordinance No. 10-002, "An Ordinance of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Requesting the County of Riverside to Conduct a Special Election on November 2, 2010, for the Purpose of Submitting to the Electors of Riverside County a Measure Which Would Modify the Commission's Authorization Limit to Issue Limited Tax Bonds and, if Approved, Would Authorize Such Increase" to request a measure on the November 2010 ballot to increase the existing Measure A bond limit; and 2) Communicate the approval of the ordinance to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors to seek Board action prior to August 6, 2010, to place the item on the November 2, 2010 ballot. 10. DESIGNATION OF A LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Page 338 Overview This item is for the Commission to designate Alternative 2, the General Purpose (GP) + Express Lanes alternative, as the Commission's locally preferred alternative for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP). Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 14, 2010 Page 10 11. AUTHORIZATION FOR ISSUANCE OF TOLL REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COSTS RELATED TO DESIGN -BUILD PHASE Page 348 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 10-026, "Resolution Authorizing the Issuance and Sale of Not to Exceed $900,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Riverside County Transportation Commission Toll Revenue Bonds in Two or More Series, the Execution and Delivery of an Indenture, a First Supplemental Indenture, a Second Supplemental Indenture, a Design - Build Agreement and a Cooperative Agreement, and the Taking of All Other Actions Necessary in Connection Therewith"; 2) Approve the form of Indenture between the Commission and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Indenture; 3) Approve the form of First Supplemental Indenture between the Commission and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final First Supplemental Indenture; 4) Approve the form of Second Supplemental Indenture between the Commission and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Second Supplemental Indenture; 5) Approve the form of Design -Build Construction Cooperative Agreement (Design -Build Agreement) between the Commission and Caltrans and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Design -Build Agreement; and 6) Approve the form of Cooperative Agreement between the Commission and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and authorize the Executive Director to approve and execute the final Cooperative Agreement. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 14, 2010 Page 11 12. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 13. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview Page 552 This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. • Report on the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) Rail Conference 2010, by Commissioners Daryl Busch, Greg Pettis, and Ron Roberts 14. CLOSED SESSION 14A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Item APN(s) Property Owner(s) 1 455 1 10 002 Sam Jr. and Mary K. Boersma 455-110-003 15. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, September 8, 2010, Board Room, County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONER SIGN -IN SHEET JULY 14, 2010 NANIE AGENCY E Mpll i DI GRESS / an belis 0/71' b b�� �� rifiriL (0/4 ooltS A \ v= cv--vi&r--jam r/k4 \i G 1 c,o A vv'N, Nt i I l ems' M o t vo A I �-,..) A r--t LO IL-r-Dr\AP.. \e-__. _3,-,-,- . g tcu G'(bA5" H viz-,-t �-� D ay)- F�fiR1P 3useg wA s %EwiEcui- / _ /�,Ae-- 1/1-0 ram..... v .,) 'Se' caJejL wvt-� �T ZI:� ��.- OP 6 C%i /-S 047 1 E J rZA-C Cr %L J .%. 6ENo t "2----- P(0 (-I "1 -otr.J tio,Qi;c1 L.42-u�P� O ��6L VI V La A-VA6u-o�.1� . S rota- _ CA Ty r9P 1 rfeAs /dC .OtdsS 'o /1//E�4-/e-! be, -a, e)2 �D/L�wo 174-�6-'3' . egg di -a 1'blse' te4c4.4a .Sa," jde, v lt, 6 t e-c..t,_► f\i ./- zN43',.3 A-7-LA / GK- f V, .u. „4-.�7 % 4., 16k-(i (�.✓� ST B V2 Poo 9s/6-f" 7,'ALout Spr; 1,17.i. ,,Slel! J �ii-t� /�eJ� } % I` 1 S, v<�f ` ;iv RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL J U LY 14, 2010 Present County of Riverside- District I County of Riverside, District II County otRiversiae,2.D strict;III County of Riverside, District IV _ _ _ County ofRrverstcle, District City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Blythe City of Cagan City of Canyon Lake City of Cati edral`t t City of Coachella City of Corona: City of Desert Hot Springs City of Hemet City of Indian Wells City oflnd'ro City of La Quinta City of Lake Elsinore-° City of Menifee City of Moreno Valley City of Murrieta City of Noreo . City of Palm Desert City of City of Perris City oRanclio$M City of Riverside City of City of Temecula City of Wildar'x Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8 Absent O O O Page 1 of 1 Tara Byerly - COMMISSION AGENDA - July 14, 2010 From: Tara Byerly To: Byerly, Tara Date: 7/12/2010 7:20 AM Subject: COMMISSION AGENDA - July 14, 2010 Attachments: agenda_2010_07.pdf Good Morning Commission Alternates: For your information, attached below is the July 14, 2010 Commission Agenda. If you would like to view the detailed information please go to our website at: www.rctc.org. Thank you. Respectfully, Tara S. Byerly Senior Administrative Assistant Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 file://C:\Documents and Settings\tbyerly\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3AC24CRCT... 1/5/2011 DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE: 3 L y f 11-'� '7.-6;C0 CHECK IF SUBJECT OF PUBLIC COMMENTS: PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO.: (AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) SUBJECT OF AGENDA ITEM: 61J NAME: i'(��r/ rT 411�/l!" � 6-RNEy gfiw 6� PHONE NO.05-1) � �,3-4 ) jT � ADDRESS: ` PR CiSPL� CT ,grE, I�� Cs �%c4® ✓E STREET CITY ZIP CODE iL REPRESENTING: /C4/g-cb' ✓L�MCW/C1P4L 4-01//.Sp y JK PHONE No.(95 l) 3 .9 NAME OF AGENCY / ORGANIZATION / GROUP J BUSINESS ADDRESS: ' j�S 9 e'EN 7E R. zr GP R o VE 9 2-,5-6 -7 STREET CITY ZIP CODE AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES Wednesday, June 9, 2010 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Bob Buster at 9:33 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At this time, Commissioner John Benoit led the Commission in a flag salute. 3. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Steve Adams Marion Ashley John J. Benoit Roger Berg Bob Botts Bob Buster Jeff Comerchero Mary Craton Joseph DeConinck Steve Di Memmo Wallace Edgerton Scott Farnam Bonnie Flickinger Rick Gibbs Terry Henderson 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Steven Hernandez Scott Hines Richard Kelly Bob Magee Robin Lowe Paul Marchand Scott Matas Glenn Miller Malcolm Miller Patrick J. Mullany Ray Quinto Karen Spiegel John F. Tavaglione Ray Wolfe Daryl Busch Steve Pougnet Jeff Stone Chair Buster presented Anne Mayer, Executive Director, with a five-year service award. Chair Buster presented California Transportation Commission (CTC) member Joe Tavaglione with a plaque in recognition of his advocacy for projects along Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 2 the State Route 91 corridor, and most recently, the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project ISR-91 CIP). Joe Tavaglione expressed his appreciation to the Commission, its staff, and various legislators for helping to keep projects moving forward. Commissioner John Tavaglione expressed his sincere gratitude to Joe Tavaglione. At this time, Commissioner Bob Botts arrived at the meeting. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 12, 2010 M/S/C (Henderson/Benoit) to approve the minutes of May 12, 2010, meeting as submitted. Abstain: Comerchero and Hines At this time, Commissioner Steven Hernandez arrived at the meeting. 6. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEE, EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE STATE ROUTE 91 HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANES At this time, Chair Buster opened the public hearing and requested legal counsel explain the nature and scope of the hearing. Steve DeBaun, Legal Counsel, explained the nature and scope of the hearing. Commissioner Steve Adams stated all of these properties are located in the city of Riverside and it is necessary to acquire these properties for the project. He explained the city of Riverside has not received any negative contact from the property owners. Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board, verified the proofs of mailing that certify notices were sent to the property owners of said parcel numbers are on record with the Commission. Min Saysay, Right of Way Manager, explained the Commission is requested to make the four required findings and adopt the resolutions of necessity, • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 3 declaring its intent to acquire interest in real property through eminent domain for the construction and maintenance of the HOV lanes on the SR-91 in the city of Riverside, and highlighted the following: • A map depicting the SR-91 HOV lane project; and • Ground and aerial views of the subject properties. Jennifer Harmon stated there were no written objections or protests, however, there was one request to speak on this matter. Chair Buster called upon any persons with an interest in the property who wish to be heard on this matter. Craig Johnson, representing property owner Joe Hale, expressed the following concerns: 1) The proposed 1.5% slope increase on Ivy Street; and 2) The Commission's offer of compensation as it does not address many aspects of compensation required by law including lack of access to the property owner's driveway during construction, mitigation to address weekly street sweeping, loss of a roommate, and mitigation for dust and cleaning costs incurred during construction. He requested the Commission reconsider the need to move forward immediately. He stated he has forwarded an appraisal to the Commission's appraiser that considers these issues. Min Saysay stated all negotiations up to this time have been held with the property owner. He clarified the legal counsel representing the Hale property was hired one to two weeks ago, and staff was informed this morning that an appraisal was prepared and delivered to the Commission's appraiser. He confirmed staff will consider the appraisal. Steve DeBaun clarified compensation is not the purpose of this hearing and reconfirmed the appraisal submitted by the property owner will be considered. However, the appraisal does not impact the findings the Commission is currently being requested to consider. In response to Chair Buster's request for clarification about an alternate design for the slope at the Hale property, Steve DeBaun replied the design meets all engineering requirements and was provided to the property owner. He stated the Commission will consider any changes that could positively impact the property and still meet engineering requirements. Anne Mayer explained the Commission's action to make the four findings and adopt the resolutions of necessity does not preclude staff from working cooperatively with the property owner and Caltrans to minimize the impact on Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 4 the property. She explained the state and federal process requires the involvement of the property owner to ensure these types of issues are raised as early in the process as possible. She stated the Commission made offers of first -level review to all of the property owners; none of the property owners attended those review sessions. She explained the offer of first -level review is made on all properties brought to the Commission. Commissioner Adams motioned to make the four findings and adopt the resolutions of necessity. He assured the city of Riverside will waive the street sweeping regulation during construction for the property owner. Commissioner Roger Berg expressed strong concern that the Commission's appraiser or staff did not consider other alternatives for the slope increase and access to the street and driveway during construction. Chair Buster replied that as the Commission's executive director explained, there are several opportunities for the property owner to comment at various stages of the process. At this time, Commissioner Paul Marchand arrived at the meeting. Steve DeBaun clarified appraisals consider several different factors and it is staff's position the appraisal is legally sufficient. The Commission is willing to discuss those factors and the impacts the property owner's representative has raised at this hearing. Anne Mayer stated the Commission is required, if a property owner desires, to pay for an independent appraisal. She reiterated the Commission has not yet received the property owner's appraisal and compensation is not the subject of the findings the Commission makes at the hearing. Commissioner Terry Henderson confirmed the careful manner in which the Commission approaches all of these issues and that the Hale property owner will be treated with the utmost care and consideration. Chair Buster called upon any other persons with an interest in the property who wish to be heard on this matter. There were no other requests to speak. Chair Buster then called upon all other persons who wish to be heard on this matter. There were no requests to speak. At this time, Chair Buster closed the public hearing. • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 5 M/S/C/ (Adams/Lowe) to: 1) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c) The real property to be acquired is necessary for the project; and d) The offer is just compensation has been made to the property owners. 2) Adopt Resolutions of Necessity Nos. 10-016, 10-017, 10-018, 10-019, 10-020, 10-021, 10-022, 10-023, and 10-024, "Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition of Fee, Easement, and Temporary Construction Easement Interests in Certain Real Property, Located in Riverside County, California, by Eminent Domain, More Particularly Described as Assessor Parcel Numbers 215-332-023; 219-041-008; 219-043-025 and 219-043-026; 219-281-007; 219-301-006; 225-263-015; 225-350-050; 229-081-002; 229-110-035; 229-110-040, 229-110-04, 229-110-047, and 229-110-051 (Ca!trans Parcel Nos. 20875-1 and 20875-2; 20874-1; 20423-1 and 20423-2; 20879-1 and 20879-2; 20867-1; 21109-1 and 21109-2; 20410-1 and 20410-3; 20686-1 and 20686-2; 20860-1; 20860-2; 20860-3; 20860-4, 20860-5, 20860-6, 20860-7, 20860-8, and 20860-9), for the Construction and Maintenance of Improvements Related to the State Route 9/ High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes, From Adams Street to the 60/91/215 Interchange, in Riverside County, California." Abstain: Cathedral City No: Berg 7. PUBLIC HEARING — PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager, presented the proposed Budget for FY 2010/11, and discussed the following areas: • Budget adjustments; • Budget summary; • Funding sources; • Summary of expenditures; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 6 • Management services; • Regional programs; • Capital program expenditures and highlights; • Functional uses breakdown; • Measure A administration; and • Final steps. Chair Buster announced the continuance of the public hearing from the May 12 meeting and requested comments from the public at this time. No comments were received from the public and the Chair closed the public hearing. Commissioner Paul Marchand commended staff for the budget and motioned to approve the Budget for FY 2010/11. In response to Commissioner Wallace Edgerton's request for clarification regarding debt service, Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, replied the debt service costs relate to the 2009 bonds, the anticipated 2010 bond issuance, and commercial paper. Anne Mayer noted the proposals for the 2010 bond issuance are included in the Budget for FY 2010/11, however, adoption of the budget does not approve the direct issuance of the bonds. M/S/C (Marchand/Lowe) to adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2010/11. 8. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS There were no additions or revisions to the agenda. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (Ashley/Marchand) to approve the following Consent Calendar items: 9A. RESOLUTION NO. 10-015, RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ESTABLISHING THE COMMISSION'S APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 Approve Resolution No. 10-015, Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Commission's Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2010/11". • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 7 9B. GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD STATEMENT NUMBER 54 FUND BALANCE REPORTING AND GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPE 1) Receive and file the Commission's new fund balance reporting policy; and 2) Approve the commitment of unexpended fund balance at June 30, 2010, in the Right of Way Management fund for right of way management services relating to rail and highway properties. 9C. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the nine -month period ended March 31, 2010. 9D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. 9E. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2010. 9F. AGREEMENTS WITH LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND ICF INTERNATIONAL FOR ON -CALL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES 1) Award the following agreements to provide on -call environmental consulting services for a three-year term in an aggregate amount of $1.2 million: a) Agreement No. 10-31-083-00 to LSA Associates, Inc; and b) Agreement No. 10-31-101-00 to ICF International; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute task orders awarded to these consultants under the terms of the agreements. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 8 9G. AMENDMENT TO COMMISSION'S COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2006/07 AND FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS 1) Amend the Commission's Commuter Rail Program FY 2006/07 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect a reallocation of $4 million in Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 program funds originally approved for the North Main Corona parking structure to the Perris Valley Line (PVL) project; 2) Amend the Commission's Commuter Rail Program FY 2009/10 SRTP to reflect allocation of $9.975 million in FTA Section 5309 program funds and deobligation of $8.8 million in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds and $1.175 million in State Transit Assistance (STA) funds for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) rail car procurement project and reduction of LTF Capital Improvement Program expenditures by $480,000; and 3) Approve reductions to budgeted revenues and expenditures in the LTF, STA, Rail Operations, and Rail Capital funds. 9H. AGREEMENT WITH ELITE ELECTRIC INC. TO PROVIDE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE FIVE COMMISSION -OWNED COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS AND THE PERRIS TRANSIT CENTER IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1) Award Agreement No. 10-24-082-00 to Elite Electric, Inc. (Elite) for lighting maintenance services at the five Commission -owned commuter rail stations and the Perris Transit Center for a three-year period, and two one-year options, for a total contract amount of $550,000; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 9 91. PURCHASE OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1) Authorize the Executive Director to purchase right of way for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), pursuant to consultation with an ad hoc committee appointed by the Chair; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute all agreements related to the purchase of right of way for the SR-91 CIP. 9J. AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS WITH DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES, PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTANTS, AND PSOMAS FOR ON -CALL RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING SERVICES 1) Approve the following agreements for on -call right of way engineering and surveying services in the aggregate amount of $450,000; a) Agreement No. 07-33-143-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 07-33-143-00, with David Evans & Associates; b) Agreement No. 07-33-145-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 07-33-145-00, with Project Design Consultants; and c) Agreement No. 07-33-144-02, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 07-33-144-00, with Psomas; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. 9K. FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 - FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS Review and approve, in concept, the FY 2010/11 - FY 2012/13 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTP) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, Riverside, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA), Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine), and the Commission's Commuter Rail Program. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 10 9L. FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 MINIMUM FARE REVENUE RATIO FOR RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY AND SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 1) Reaffirm the methodology used to calculate the required fare box recovery ratio; and 2) Approve the FY 2010/11 minimum fare revenue to operating cost ratio of 17.09% for Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and 17.97% for SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine). 9M. AMENDMENT TO RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN 1) Approve a modification to Riverside Transit Agency's (RTA) FY 2009/10 operating assistance funding by allocating $50,000 in Measure A funds designated for Specialized Transit/Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA) for Western Riverside County (Western County); 2) Approve a modification to RTA's FY 2009/10 capital improvement program to reflect an additional $4,007,425 in Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) and $3,508,333 in FY 2008/09 Proposition 1 B grant funding; and 3) Approve Amendment No. 1 to RTA's FY 2009/10 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect these changes. 9N. AMENDMENT TO SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN 1) Approve a modification to SunLine Transit Agency's (SunLine) FY 2009/10 operating assistance funding by amending the original amount from $22,735,270 to $21,903,610 due to a combination of decreases in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds, Measure A funding, and federal Sections 5307, 5311, and 5317 allocations; 2) Approve a modification to SunLine's FY 2009/10 capital improvement program by using FY 2006/07 carryover funds of $502,865 in State Transit Assistance (STA), replacing previously approved LTF for local match to federally funded capital projects; and using an additional $594,000 in Section 5309 to replace Section 5307 funds for the bus rehabilitation project; 3) Approve a budget adjustment to the FY 2009/10 budget to reflect a reduction of $761,500 in LTF expenditures; and 4) Approve an amendment to SunLine's FY 2009/10 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect these changes. • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 11 90. FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Approve the FY 2010/11 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program recommended funding as shown in the attached schedule. 9P. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM REALLOCATION FOR THE CITY OF BEAUMONT Grant the city of Beaumont (Beaumont) a reallocation of unused SB 821 funds from its FY 2008/09 Citywide sidewalk and access ramps project to its FY 2009/10 Beaumont Avenue sidewalk and access ramps project. 9Q. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA Grant the city of Temecula (Temecula) an extension to June 30, 2011, for approved SB 821 program funds for the Santa Gertrudis Creek pedestrian/bicycle bridge overcrossing project. 9R. FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 MEASURE A COMMUTER ASSISTANCE BUSPOOL SUBSIDY FUNDING CONTINUATION REQUESTS 1) Authorize payment of $1,645/month maximum per buspool for the period July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 to the existing Corona, Mira Loma, and Riverside buspools; and 2) Require subsidy recipients to meet monthly buspool reporting requirements as supporting documentation to receive payments. 9S. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation. At this time, Commissioner John Benoit left the meeting. 10. PROPOSED METROLINK BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director, presented the Metrolink Budget for FY 2010/11, highlighting the following areas: • A map depicting the Metrolink routes; • Metrolink update; • Metrolink safety initiatives; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 12 • Systemwide ridership; • Inland Empire - Orange County Line (IE0C), Riverside Line, and the 91 Line riderships; • 2011 operating budget; • Commission impact; • Commission stations; and • Rail operations issues. At Commissioner Marchand's request, Robert Yates discussed the decrease in ridership over previous years and its correlation to the unemployment rate. Chair Buster briefed the Commission on discussions at the last State Route 91 Advisory Committee meeting regarding reductions in toll lane fees due to the economic downturn and asked if there have been discussions at the Metrolink Board about reducing certain fares in order to attract additional ridership. Commissioner Lowe stated the Metrolink Board, staff, and the public had been trying to reach a solution to balance the budget, including fare increases, for approximately six months. The fare increase proposal was withdrawn. M/S/C (Lowe/Henderson) to: 1) Adopt the preliminary FY 2010/11 Metrolink operating and capital budget; and 2) Allocate the Commission's funding commitment to the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) in an amount not to exceed of $8 million including contingency, in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds for train operations and maintenance of way, and $1,224,700 for capital projects to be funded by Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 funds. 11. 2010 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTION Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager, presented the 2010 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) adoption. Anne Mayer discussed the I-15/French Valley Parkway interchange project and stated the Commission will continue to work with the city of Temecula staff to identify other funding sources. Anne Mayer recognized Grace Alvarez, Staff Analyst; Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager; and Andrea Zureick, Senior Staff Analyst, as staff responsible for funding from federal and state sources to the Commission and keeping projects moving forward. • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 13 Chair Buster stated the Commission is impressed with the number of projects that have remained active. M/S/C (Marchand/Lowe) to receive and file 2010 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) adoption. 12. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA There were no agenda items pulled from the Consent Calendar. 13. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 13A. Chair Buster announced the formation of the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project Property Ad Hoc Committee, comprised of Commissioners Steve Adams, Bob Botts, Scott Farnam, Malcolm Miller, and Jeff Stone. 13B. Anne Mayer announced the 74/215 groundbreaking event will be held on Monday, June 14 at 2:00 p.m. 13C. Commissioner Mary Craton: • Expressed her gratitude to the Commission for approving funding for the bicycle lanes for Railroad Canyon Road in the city of Canyon Lake; and • Announced the opening of Newport Road, a six -lane road connecting Newport Road in west Menifee to Railroad Canyon Road at the east end of Canyon Lake. 13D. Commissioner Karen Spiegel announced the ceremony for the placement of the pedestrian bridge extension for the new Corona Transit Center will be held on Monday, June 14 at 10:00 a.m. At this time, Commissioners Glenn Miller and Ray Quinto left the meeting. 14. CLOSED SESSION 14A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — INITIATION OF LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c) Potential Number of Case(s): Two Approval was given to legal counsel to initiate an action for one of the matters discussed with the Commission in closed session. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 9, 2010 Page 14 15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 11:55 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, July 14, 2010, in the Board Room, at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California. Respectfully submitted, 09,JN'i_ Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board • • AGENDA ITEM 6 • PUBLIC HEARING • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Fina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Riverside County Transit Services Funding Allocation for Fiscal Year 2010/11 BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a public hearing at the July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the FY 2010/11 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2010/11 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP); and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 10-025, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds". BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year, through the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) process, transit operating and capital subsidies consisting of federal, state, and local revenues are allocated to eight transit operators providing public transportation in Riverside County. At its June 9, 2010 meeting, the Commission approved the FY 2010/11 - FY2012/13 SRTPs in concept for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, Riverside, the Commission's Commuter Rail Program, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA), Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); and SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine). The SRTPs identify each agency's operating and capital needs, funding sources, consolidated financial plan, and provide the framework required to comply with federal regulations, the Transportation Development Act (TDA), state law, and Commission -adopted guidelines and policies. The SRTPs, which are updated annually, provide a three-year outlook for service improvements, planning activities, and capital programs. As the transportation planning agency, the Commission is responsible for allocation of transit funds, performance monitoring, and operator oversight. The approved SRTPs provide the basis for the Commission's oversight Agenda Item 6 1 activities to help establish system policy, determine appropriate service goals, and provide management with the necessary information to efficiently operate bus and rail services in the county. In January 2010, the Commission received information on the FY 2010/11 revenud projections, which indicated a decrease of approximately 1 1 % in LTF and 4% in Measure A funding compared to the FY 2009/10 original estimates. Faced with significant reductions in both state and local sales tax revenues, Commission staff directed the transit operators to prepare a prudent spending plan aimed at decreasing operating budgets by at least 15%. Several measures were considered by the operators that included trimming of unproductive services, fare increases, streamlining of administrative expenses, and staff reductions, as well as reprogramming of carryover funds from previous years. Through various combinations of the above -referenced cost cutting measures, the reduction target was achieved and is reflected by a system -wide drop in LTF expenditures of approximately 15.1 %. The reduction has also benefited from the additional use of previously unidentified federal Section 5307 funds, as well as carryover funds from other federal grants including Sections 5316 and 5317 and excess funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) stimulus program. Resulting from these measures, staff has been able to limit the draw against on -hand LTF reserves to 2 % . Careful analysis and consideration was made to evaluate every feasible option with the least impact on the core services that each operator provides, and the plans are based on conservative baseline budget estimates that operators can realistically and reasonably expect to receive from known revenue sources. Operations are now more closely aligned with available revenues. SRTP Financial and Ridership Overview Based on submitted SRTPs for FY 2010/11, it is estimated that $157 million in funding is required to support the operating and capital requests for the provision of Riverside County transit services. The following table provides an overview of the operating and capital costs together with projected ridership levels by apportionment area. Agenda Item 6 • • 2 • Operating Capital Table 1 - FY 2010/11 Operating, Capital and Ridership Projections Western Riverside Coachella Palo Verde Valley Valley Total Bus Rail $ 56,996,022 $ 11,563,900 $ 21,324,379 $ 829,369 $ 90,713,670 7,121,871 18,410,272 8,909,416 322,005 34,763,564 Total (Oper & Capital) 64,117,893 29,974,172 30,233,795 1,151,374 125,477,234 Leverage of Commuter Rail Funds' 31,475,500 31,475,500 GRAND TOTAL $64,117,893 $61,449,672 $30,233,795 $1,151,374 $156,952,734 FY10/11 Projected Ridership 8,119,172 2,939,639 3,715,891 43,545 14,818,247 LA Metro, OCTA & SANBAG's share and passenger fare revenues for Commuter Rail Expenses Although the operators designed their respective plans to reduce spending with minimum effect on transit service, the overall economic climate will continue to impact ridership. Attachment 4 of this report shows the funding plan for FY 2010/11 will generate approximately 14.8 million in ridership, about 3% lower than this year's projected ridership. Funding levels for next year's transit operations reflect a systemwide decrease of 4% in total operating expenses. With the elimination of STA funding since July 1, 2009, and without new STA funding in FY 2010/11, capital expenses were cut significantly by about 61 %. Last year's capital spending was largely funded by the ARRA program funds. For FY 2010/11, transit operators programmed their funding share of the Proposition 1 B FY 2008/09 funds, which were awarded and released this year. FY 2010/11 Operating and Capital Costs To implement the SRTPs for FY 2010/11, the request is to utilize approximately $90.7 million for operating and $34.8 million for capital in addition ,to • the $31.5 million share from Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) to leverage the Commuter Rail Program. The chart below provides an overview of the operating and capital costs by funding source required to provide transit services in Riverside County: Agenda Item 6 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY: FY 2010/11 OPERATING and CAPITAL COSTS TDA (LTF & STA Funds), $49,954,785 , 32% Carry Over Funds (LTF/STA/5307, $6,770,222, 4% Addll Rail Operating Subsidy paid by SANBAG, OCTA& LA Metro, $17,506,800 , 11% Other Revenues, $1,704,324, 1% Measure A, $11,054,350 , 7% PaccPrger Fares, $26,739,077 , 17% Federal Formula Funds (Sec 5307 & 5311), $30,013,354 , 19% Federal -Discretionary Funds (Sec 5309), $2,150,000, 1% Flop 1B (Cap+Security), $10,352,539 , 7% Sec 5316 & 5317, $707,283, 1% PASSENGER FARE$ Pudic Bus = $12,770,377 Commuter Raa= 313.983.70Q TOTAL = $26,739,077 Of the $156.9 million operating and capital costs identified in the chart approximately $52.7 million (33.6%) is derived from: • Passenger fares; • Commuter rail member agencies' revenue share; • Carryover funds (LTF/STA/Proposition 1 B/5307/5316/5317/ARRA); and • Miscellaneous other revenues (bus shelter advertising, TRIP revenue, Metrolink transfer fares, interest income, etc.). The remaining balance of approximately $104 million (66.4%) consists of federal, state, and local funds (including Proposition 1 B funding) that are allocated through Commission action. Transportation Development Act Funding The TDA provides two funding sources namely: LTF and STA. The LTF funds are derived from 1% cent of the state retail sales tax collected in each county. The State Board of Equalization returns the sales tax revenues to the county of Riverside through the Commission where it is held until the Commission provides written allocation instructions for disbursement. It is estimated that LTF revenue for transit services for FY 2010/1 1 will be $49,101,136, an 11 To decrease compared to the original projected amount for FY 2009/10, and is consistent with the revenue projection provided at the January 2010 Commission meeting. Agenda Item 6 • 4 • • • The STA is derived from sales tax on gasoline and diesel fuel. Fifty percent of STA funds are allocated according to population. The other 50% is allocated according to the ratio of the total public transit revenues generated in each area during the prior fiscal year. In March 2009, the STA funding for transit was completely. eliminated by the state. There is approximately $5.4 million in STA unallocated reserve funds projected at the end of FY 2009/10, and only $5,730 of this fund balance will be utilized by Palo Verde Valley for a capital project in FY 2010/11. Prior to approving the STA allocations, the Commission must adopt the attached resolution as specified in the TDA statutes and California Code of Regulations. In addition to that required by TDA, the Commission also adopted revised policies in March 2010 for the FY 2010/11 budget. These policies require all operators to spend down existing capital balances prior to requesting additional funds. This policy will ensure that projects are either completed or the funds reprogrammed, providing for the most efficient use of existing capital funds. The Commission must allocate funds to support the transit services and capital projects contained in the FY 2010/11 SRTPs in order for the public transit operators to claim LTF and/or STA funds. The requested allocations are consistent with the approved SRTPs, and the funds are explicitly for the projects stated in the approved plans. The TDA allocations for FY 2010/11 requested by each operator are outlined in Attachment 3. FY 2010/11 Federal Funding Requests: Sections 5307, 5309, 5311, 5316 and 5317 Section 5307 Formula Funds There are four urbanized areas (UZA) in Riverside County that receive federal operating and capital grant funding through FTA's Section 5307 program. • Riverside/San Bernardino; • Hemet/San Jacinto; • Temecula/Murrieta; and • Indio/Cathedral City/Palm Springs. Attachment 2 is the proposed Section 5307 POP for Riverside County. The Commission must develop and approve a POP for each UZA and conduct a public hearing prior to an operator submitting its Section 5307 grant application to FTA. If the draft POP is not amended through the public hearing process, the POP will become final as presented and will be included in an approved RTIP, which is subsequently forwarded to the Southern California Association of Governments for review and processing. The Section 5307 requested funds shown below include the Section 5307 Riverside -San Bernardino UZA and $177,288 of Section 5307 Los Angeles/Long Beach/Santa Ana UZA funds allocated to the Commission's Regional Commuter Rail Program. Agenda Item 6 5 FY 2010/11 Section 5307 Requested Funds City of Riverside Special Services $ 240,000 RTA 15,691,726 The Commission's Regional Commuter Rail 11,224,700 SunLine 2,164,804 TOTAL $ 29,321,230 The actual Section 5307 apportionments for. FY 2010/11 will not be known until later this calendar year when final appropriations are made by Congress. The POP was developed at the highest anticipated funding amount to allow the operators to proceed with their grant applications and to avoid delays associated with program amendments should the actual apportionments come in lower than estimated. Any excess funds will be carried over to the subsequent fiscal year and will be made available to cover future projects. Section 5309 Discretionary Funds This is a discretionary pool of federal funds designated for public transit operators to purchase replacement or expansion buses and improve facilities. RTA and SunLine have identified projects totaling $2.150 million in Section 5309 discretionary funds for FY 2010/11 programming. RTA's FY 2010/11 earmark project includes procurement of three 40-foot revenue vehicles for replacement. SunLine's Section 5309 earmark will fund additional paratransit vehicles to expand demand response service. The projects must be included in an approved RTIP before the operators can access these funds. FY 2010/11 Section 5309 Earmarks RTA $1,400,000 SunLine 750,000 TOTAL $2,150,000 Section 5311 Formula and Discretionary Funds The FTA Section 5311 program administered by Caltrans is designed t6 provide financial assistance to eligible local public transportation providers in rural areas and communities with a population of less than 50,000. The majority of funds are passed through to counties based on a population formula. Any remaining funds are awarded in a statewide discretionary program by Caltrans for rural capital projects and intercity bus programs. This year's program was prepared using the FY 2009/10 funding level for transit operations since the actual apportionments will not be known until the final appropriations are released. By programming at Agenda Item 6 • • 6 • • what may be the same level of funding, the operators will be able to apply for maximum funding and avoid delays to amend their programs. The program allocates $692,124 in formula funds for Riverside County, of which. 61.7% will be allocated to RTA and 38.3%, for SunLine. As in previous years, both RTA and SunLine identified the use of Section 5311 formula funds for operating. The 61.7%/38.3% formula was approved by the Commission in 1987, and was based on the level of service each agency operated in the non-UZA of the county. Next year, the split will be evaluated with the possible inclusion of Palo Verde Valley to share this non-UZA funding. The Commission must develop and approve a Section 5311 POP before grants are approved. FY 2010/11 Section 5311 Requested Funds Agency RTA SunLine TOTAL Section 5316 & 5317 Formula Funds Amount $ 427,041 265,083 $ 692,124 % Allocation 61.7 % 38.3% 100% Authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act, a Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), two recent federal programs, namely Section 5316 - Job Access Reverse Commute (JARC) and Section 5317 — New Freedom (NF), were established to meet the transportation needs of low- income population, welfare recipients, and persons with disabilities. All projects funded under this program must be derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit -human services transportation planning process. RTA, SunLine, and PVVTA were awarded FY 2007 and 2008 JARC and NF funding and programmed these funds for FY 2009/10 and FY 2010/11. For FY 2010/11, funding allotments are utilized as follows: RTA SunLine PVVTA TOTAL Section 5316-JARC $ 473,160 134,772 52,489 $ 660,421 Section 5317-NF $ 6,232 23,134 17,496 $ 46,862 These funds will be used to cover expenses for RTA's Commuter Link 212 and 217 and extended fixed route services, SunLine's extended late night service and PVVTA's mobility management program. Agenda Item 6 7 Staff recommendation is to approve the TDA and FTA funds as presented. Any modifications in farebox revenues, federal grants, Measure A funding or carryover funds may require operators to revise their services to operate within the available funding. Fiscal Impact The funding allocations are based on the revenue estimates developed for the FY 2010/11 Commission budget. The budget adopted at the June 9 Commission. meeting included $52.573 million in LTF transit operating expenditures, $4.789 million in LTF transit capital expenditures and $5,839,500 in STA capital expenditures. These budgeted expenditures, which include use of prior year capital allocations, are expected to be funded by FY 2010/11 revenues, as well as available fund balances. Based on these recommended allocations, no budget adjustments are required. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2010/11 Amount: $49,949,055 (LTF) $ 5,730 (STA} Source of Funds: TDA: LTF and STA Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE Western County Bus Palo Verde Valley 601 62 86101 P2210 $ 28,785,380 Western County Rail 241 62 86102 P2203 $ 5,730 601 62 86101 P2213 $ 11,177,400 Coachella Valley 601 62 86.101 P2211 $ 9,314,807 Palo Verde Valley 601 62 86101 P2212 $ 671,468 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \I-41.4,Aim/7,, Date: 06/16/10 Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 10-025 2) Section 5307 Program of Projects 3) TDA Spreadsheets (LTF and STA) 4) FY 2010/2011 and FY 2009/10 Operating and Capital Requests and Ridership Projections Agenda Item 6 • • 8 • • ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION NO. 10-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO ALLOCATE STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission is designated the regional entity responsible for the allocation of State Transit Assistance Funds within Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission has examined the Short Range Transit Plans and Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, all proposed expenditures in Riverside County are in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, the level of passenger fares is sufficient for claimants to meet the fare revenue requirements of Public Utilities Code Sections 99268.2, 99268.3, 99268.4, 99268.5, and 99268.9, as applicable; and WHEREAS, the claimant is making full use of federal funds available under the Federal Transit Act; and WHEREAS, the sum of the claimant's allocations from the state transit assistance fund and from the local transportation fund does not exceed the amount the claimant is eligible to receive during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, priority consideration has been given to claims to offset reductions in federal operating assistance and the unanticipated increase in the cost of fuel, to enhance existing public transportation services, and to meet high priority regional, countywide, or area -wide public transportation needs; and WHEREAS, the public transit operators have made a reasonable effort to implement the productivity improvements recommended pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 99244; and WHEREAS, the claimant is not precluded by any contract entered into on or after June 28, 1979, from employing part-time drivers or contracting with common carriers or persons operating under a franchise or license; and WHEREAS, operators are in full compliance with Section 18081.1 of the Vehicle Code, as required in Public Utilities Code Section 99251. ATTACHMENT 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission to allocate State Transit Assistance Funds for FY 2010/11 as detailed in Attachment 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14`h day of July, 2010. Bob Buster, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 10 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2010/11 URBANIZED AREA: RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO Total Apportionment (Projected based on prior year actuals) Bus Rail Total ATTACHMENT2 Page 1 of 4 Apportionment $10,325,443 $4,734,551 $15,059,994 Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover $5 809,797 $6,548,389 $12,358,186 Total Funds Available $16,135,240 $11,282,940 $27,418,180 Less Current Requests $10,348,139 $11,047,412 $21,395,551 Balance (Projected) $5,787401 $235,528 $6,022,629 Sub Area Allocation Riverside, City of Riverside Transit Agency RCTC's Commuter Rail • NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS $240,000 $10,108,139 $11,047,412 TOTAL $21,395,551 FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED TOTAL AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT Riverside, City of 1) Preventive Maintenance $ 300,000 $ 240,000 CapitaVOperating SCAG TOTAL: City of Riverside $ 300,000 $ 240,000 Riverside Transit Agency 2) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance $ 7,834,494 $ 6,267,595 Capital/Operating SCAG 3) Capital Cost of Contracting $ 6,627,599 $ 3,840,544 Capital SCAG TOTAL: Riverside Transit Agency $ 14,462,093 $ 10,108,139 RCTC's Commuter Rail 4) SCRRA Rehab/Renovation - FY 11 RCTC's share $ 1,224,700 $ 1,224,700 Capital SCAG 5) Perris Valley Line (FY 10/11) $ 10,000,000 $ 9,822,712 Capital SCAG TOTAL: RCTC Rail $ 11,224,700 $ 11,047,412 TOTAL: GRAND TOTAL $ 25,986,793 $ 21,395,551 Approved: 7/14/10 (Pending) VAJClemente15307\POP\Riv-San Bemardino1011.xls 11 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 20010/11 URBANIZED AREA: HEMET/SAN JACINTO RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Projected based on prior year actuals) Apportionment $1,884,601 Carryover (estimate) $1,558,831 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) $0 Total Funds Available $3,443,432 Less Current Requests $2,014,134 Balance (Projected) $1,429,298 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $ 23,108,099 $ 1,750,000 Operating Caltrans 2) Capitalized Tire Lease $ 260,907 $ 208,726 Capital Caltrans 3) Maintenance Equipment $ 64,260 $ 51,408 Capital Caltrans 4) Facility Maintenance $ 5,000 $ 4,000 Capital Caltrans TOTAL: $ 23,438,266 $ 2,014,134 Approved: 7/14/10 (pending) 12 V:1JCIemente153071POP\Hemet - San Jacinto UZA10-11.x1s ATTACHMENT 2 Page 3 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2010/11 URBANIZED AREA: INDIO/CATHEDRAL CITY/PALM SPRINGS RECIPIENT: SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Projected based on prior year actuals) Apportionment $3,533,405 Lapsing Funds (per FTA) $o Carryover $0 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) $o Total Funds Available $3,533,405 Less Current Requests $2,164,804 Balance (Projected) $1,368,601 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $19,449,379 $924,804 Operating SCAG 2) Bus Rehabilitation $300,000 $240,000 Capital SCAG 3) Transit Enhancement $300,000 $240,000 Capital SCAG 4) Facility Improvement $450,000 $360,000 Capital SCAG 5) Office Furniture $300,000 $240,000 Capital SCAG 6) Maintenance Tools & Equipment $200,000 $160,000 Capital SCAG TOTAL: $20,999,379 $2,164,804 Approved: 7/14/10 (pending) V:1JCIemente153071POP11ndio-Coachella-P Springs 10-11.xls 13 ATTACHMENT Page 4 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2010/11 URBANIZED AREA: TEMECULA/MURRIETA RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (Projected based on prior year actuals) Apportionment Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available Less Current Requests Balance (Projected) NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS 1) Capital Cost of Contracting 2) 3) TOTAL: Revenue Vehicles Type VII buses Capital Maintenance Spares Approved: 7/14/10 (pending) TOTAL AMOUNT $ 6,627,599 $ 968,750 $ 1,666,147 $9,262,496 $3,096,309 $0 $3,569,454 $0 $6,665,763 $3,569,453 $3,096,310 FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT $ 1,461,535 Operating $ 775,000 Capital $ 1,332,918 Capital $3,569,453 SCAG SCAG SCAG V:1JCIemenle15307\PORTemecula-Murrieta 10-11.xis 14 9l • 040Z/94/9 spellysuowoollV V1S 9 dll l I.-01.0Z Ag 'slsoo 6414eiado 10 a/egs 9,01023 s! 006'999' 44$'Iunowe %LITj0'd12iS 10 b alQel lad W 0'E4$ le palewgsa aie slsoo 64eiado s,pea Jalnwwo0 , $ 990`646`64 $ 990`646`64 $ 6L1.'8ZS'SL $ 4£Z`L VSZL $ 495`£9L`4E $ OLWELL`06 $ -m1013aIM A1Nn00 • 894'149 8941.L9 906'61.4 "Intl.'" 900`ZZ£ 69£'6Z8 A311VA 30N3A OlVd :1tl101 990' LL9 994'4L9 906'62.4 41£' 494' 4 900'ZZ£ 69V6Z8 Aoua6V l!suel1 AalleA °PGA oled L09174£'6 LOW44£'6 986'846`0Z 96L'££Z`OE 944`606`8 6L£bZ£`4Z A311VA V1131-13V00 :1V101 - L09174£'6 L09'44£'6 996'946`0Z 96L'£EZ'OE 944'606'9 6L£'4ZE'4Z Aoua6y llsue.l aullung • 004'LL4'44 004`LL4`44 ZLL`96L`84 ZL4`4L6'6Z ZLZ`01.4'84 006`£99`44 .11VN N3111WW00 • 30181:13AIN Na31S3M :1V101 • 004'LLL'lI 004'LLV1.4 ZLL'96L'94 ZLl'4L6'6Z ZLZ'044'84 006'999'44 OIwloiley4)1leaJalnwwo09,0108 • OB£`98L`8Z 09£`99L`8Z £49'Z££'9£ £68'L44'49 la aVL ZZO`966`99 sne • 3013N3AIN N213133M:1V101 Z99'496'ZZ Z99'496'ZZ 69L'999'49 444'949'49 490'Z99'4 LL£'996'64 Aoua6yllsuell9plsJaA!b 4L£'464'Z 4LE'464'Z 000'990'Z LLE'L4Z'4 000'009'4 4LE'L4L'Z seolnaag!e!oadgap!sianN 06L'999'4 06L'999'4 664'9EL 68ezetZ Z99'L4E L£L'446'4 euo/o0 to Apo 000'940'4 000'940'4 Z99'46£ Z99'604'4 Z99'69Z 000'044'4 luowneag to 40 $ L£9'990'4 $ L£9'990'4 $ £69`l84 $ mem'I. $ $69'NE $ L£9'L64'4 $ 6uluuegloAlp 44/040ZA4 l4/�LOZ A 44/040ZAd S311N3A3N 91903 S18001V11dV0 8I603ONI1VN3d0 V3NV1N3WN0111:10ddV/A0N3911 spun1s080 All spund ougwaa0 dll NOd SN011V0011V dll NON a31VWIlS3 itl101 a31VW!1S3 a31VWI1S3 031VWI1S3 11 N� V 030N3WW033N SaNnd NOI1'd1210dSNd211 1V001 Z /o L e6ed £ 1N4111 0b'l1V` SNOLLVOO11V 11SNIVNI. LL/OLOZ Ad ONIONN 10V 11431Ald013A30 N011b'1210dSNYN1 NOISSIWW00 NOLLVINOdSNV2l1 A1Nf100 301S213AIN • • olon spnivsuoOeoollV V1S 8 dll l l O40Z Ad 0£L`9 0£L'S OEL'S S I I/010Z AA i 4/040Z Ad spun] spun] Ietldeo viS 9uRend° V1S 0£L`S $ $ 0£L`S 0£V9 0£L'9 $ 0£L'9 0£L'S • 1a1013aIM A1Nf100 A311VA 30213A OIVd :1\1101 Aoua6y';isueil AapeA apJaA oled A31lVA V113H0V00 :1V101 A(oue6V pueil aununS 1IV212 maim/moo - 301S213AIN N213193M 1V101 (Nu!IoalaW) lien Jamwwo0 salmi sna - 301S213A18 N2131S3M :1V101 kua6v psueJl aplsJaAN saowas Roads apl eNu euoao0 jo Apo wowneag 40 $ $ $ 6uluueg }o 40 44/040Z Ad SONnJ S1S001V11dV0 &IMO 210d SN0I1V00l1V N9A0 AliNV0 V1S 031VWI1S3 91•111V213d0 11SNVMl V1S V1S 031VWIlS3 V1S 031VWI1S3 030N3WW00321 V321V 1N3WN011210ddV/A0N3OV SdNfld 3ONVISISSV 11SNVN131VIS SNOIlV00-11V 11SNV2l1 66/040Z Ad JNIONnd 10V 1101/W013AM NOII.V.L 10dSNV211 NOISSIWW00 NOIlV121OdSNVIR A1NI100 341S?J3AIN Z 10 Z afied £1N3WH0V11V L4 •meA snolneld wa4 spun4 ieno6Le0 VPI2IVILLCS/SECS/CO£S/91 dad/All/VAS ul ZWOLL'9$ sepnpue Lune lelol L L/O Lea Ad :a 010N 0L/6/9 uo uolsslwwo0 ay1 Aq panadde eunuos pue'a121 'oea 01011= 4 stsenbe d1uS pepuawe Leeue sen611 0u60 AA L etoN '(OaL'996'£LS) enuene xogee! Dea pue (009'90S'LL$) eeleue6eueteped wan Apesgns 6u0eiado leuomppe ul uomp 9•L£$ Aeelewexadde seed uoll0w 9'LL$ Alelewlxadde 4o emus satoa apnlete woe sme9 Jetnwwoo, %LP 8Z- 9Lb'L9Z'6LZ S 4£L'ZS6'951. $ clatol 009'Z68'4£ $ DOS'SLd L£ $ Asewnu1 % 01/e0 Ad 'POI. AA spun] net/ aeinwwo0 Lo a6eanel %LOT- £89'LLZ`61 Lte848471. %06'LE- 8L9'95Z'091. $ 4£Z`LL4'SZL $ %9Z19- £Z6'6£L'68 $ 499'£9L'4£ $ %£0"4- 69L'81,9'46 $ OL9'ELL '06 $ V3aV11V:1V101 4Z4 Z4 leZte'Zb £ZZ L99 £ £ZZ'L99'£ S49'E4 L68'9L1'£ L68'9 LL'£ %OE'OZ %0E'OZ %96'OL %96'OZ 690'LS6 690'L96 8£b'966'4Z 8£4'sse'4Z 4L£ LSL t 4LE'LSL'L S6L ££Z'0£ S6L'£EZ'OE 'h6Z'4- 8£Z 489 IL L48 850 LL %99"O6- LLL 90E 8SL 990 Z6046 %L6'0 64£'L46'Z 6E9'6E6'Z %SZ'L9- LEL'9S£'LL ZL L'4L6'6Z %90'9- LL6'Z49'9 ZLL'6L L'8 %6L'OZ- 4£b'L46'08 £6e'LL 1'49 %LZ'905 °YoLZ 906 %9 L'89 L %9 L'89 L 000 Z£ 000'Z£ 8Z8' L60'£ ear t.so'c SOO ZZE S00'ZZ£ 9147 606 9 91 '606'9 %9E'0 L- 9449'Z 690'SZ6 690'SZ6 OL9 £06 4Z 0L9'£06'LZ 69£'6Z8 69£'6Z9 6L£'teZ£'LZ 6L£'4Z£'lZ V101 1A311VA 30a3A OIVd Aoua6V tlsueJl AelleA ap/e/N oled V101 :A311VA V1131-10V00 /ZS'OL- 560'919 98 £4L Z£S'SZ %LE'to 910069 LL ZZ6659 89 Ilea 8 me 1V1011A1N(103 N2131S3M %9Z'ZL- LEL'SLE'99 ZLZ'OLb'9L %8Z'S 009'E86'OL 006'£99'LL %L 9'69- 9S6'04Z'OZ LLe'LZL'L %L L'9- 9L4'90L09 ZZO'966'99 %L4'9- L99 Z66'L 9L8'9L4'L %48'ZZ- PE 68L'OL L449 L949 %8L EL- 99604L'LI. P90Z994 %48 S- 9LL'91,0'ES LLE'996'617 %000 Lat L 909'LSL %LWL- 961,'9Z£'b lLE'LOZ'b %00'0Z 000'05Z'L 000'009'F %9L0L• 964'8L0'£ 4L£'L4L'Z %eel- LeL'LZZ ObL'90Z %49'9 8Z9'6£4 0e9'LSL %00'0 8bL'LEL 9bL'LEL %0£'9L- 494'90L'Z 6ena'Z %SL'£Z- OOS'8b81. Z9S'604'L %09'LZ 059'Pa L $ Oa099't $ Jee0peul (8lewlis3) (uellee(ad) Jeeapoul 0LI60Ad LL/OL AA Y 01460Ad Lt/OL AA % dIHSa301a b1N3WHOV11V • 1600 1V101 %L024- 000'009 %£S'9S- 000'0$9 ZSS'Lb£ %99'L- 4S4'90 L'Z Z99'69Z %98'4- 00996 L'L 11ea :A4uno0 walsaM ens :AtunoO Luolsam Aoua6V 8sue�1 apislanla SODIAlaS leloads eplsJanla LEL'446' L euoioO 4o Apo 000'017L' L tuownea9 0) 40 $ £69'NE $ %90'9- 099'4LZ'L $ L£S'L6 L'L $ 6wuue84o Al10 +oa0poul 01460Ad 4410LAA % J3e0poul 0L/60A4 LL/O LAA nelLY 1N3WNOIluOddV/AONSOV o� 1V11dV0 01‘111Va3d0 suoi eyxid diyslapib pue eisoo !elide° g',unwed() 04/6003 Ad'8 44/040Z Ad ;o uospedwoo • • y1111°111- Allocation of Rift -ding for ' Rfverside County= The Economics of Public Transit Nobody likes transit cuts: In fact, the overwhelming majority of Americans want more public transportation, not less. In a poll conducted by Transportation for America, 82 percent of voters said 'the United States would benefit from an expanded and improved transportation system, such as rail and buses°. The reality: Agencies all across the country including many of our partner agencies in Southem California have had to implement cost reductions, slash service, freeze wages and lay off workers. The Economics of Public Transit The Economics of Public Transit in Riverside County LTF 2008 $62.9 million 2009 $56.1 million 2010 $49.1 million STA 2008 $4.9 million 2009 $0 2010 $0"• i Measure A 2008 $131.6 million 2009 $122.6 million 2010 $106.0 million • STA Originally programmed at $22.9 million for 2008 " $12.9 million in new STA released by Slate 6130/2010 1 Riverside County SRTP and Funding Allocation Process • Short Range Transit Plan process started For FY 2010/2011, RCTC guidance for SRTP preparation requested all operators to implement a 15% reduction in draws against available revenues. Final Step in SRTP and Funding Allocation Process 1 • Staff recommendation of approval for the 2010 transit funding allocation i Operator Actions Taken During SRTP Development ►?CTC • Fare increases, staff reductions, streamlining of administrative expenses, elimination of under -performing service, reduction of service hours, revision of DAR and use of carryover funds • Service now conformed to revenue Draw reduction goal achieved: 15.1 % LTF reserve used: 2% On -going Financial Management • Reserve policy in place approved by Commission 1/2005 • STA to be revisited: $12.8 million recently authorized for Riverside County • New Call for projects for FY 2011-13 to Commission for approval fall of 2010 2 AGENDA ITEM 8A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Audit Ad Hoc Committee Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Close -Out Audit AUDIT AD HOC COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Compliance with Requirements Applicable to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Planning, Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Program, Project No. PPM 07-6054(044) report. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission is a recipient of STIP PPM funds and submitted reimbursement claims totaling $1.947 million under Project No. PPM 07-6054(044). A close-out audit of this project is required and was completed in May 2010. The auditor examined management's assertion regarding the reimbursement claims submitted, charges for costs incurred, and compliance and opined that the assertion is fairly stated in all material respects based on the requirements of the State of California Department of Transportation. Attachment: Compliance with Requirements Applicable to the STIP PPM Program, Project No. PPM 07-6054(044) Agenda Item 8A 18 i RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to the State Transportation Improvement Program Planning, Programming and Monitoring Program Fund Transfer Agreement and Project No. PPM07-6054(044) For the Period July 20, 2006 through November 2, 2009 Submitted by TCBA THOMPSON, COBB, BAZILIO & ASSOCIATES,PC 21250 Hawthorne Blvd. Suite 150 Torrance, CA 90503 rH 310.792.4640 . Fx 310.792.4331 . www.tcba.com Headquarters: Washington, DC 19 • • • Table of Contents Page Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to the State Transportation Improvement Program Planning, Programming, and Monitoring Program I Report of Riverside County Transportation Commission's Compliance Declarations in Connection with the State Transportation Improvement Program Planning, Programming and Monitoring Program State Agreement and Project No. PPM07-6054(044) 3 20 THOMPSON, COBB, BAZIIJO ES ASSOCIATES, PC CERTIRED PUBUC ACCOUNTANTS AND MANAGEMENT„SYSTEMS, AND FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS 21250 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD 1101 15'" STREET. N.W. 100 PEARL STREET SUITE 150 SUITE 400 14'^ FLOOR TORRANCE, CA 90503 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 HARTFORD, CT 06103 310-792-4640 202-737-3300 203-249-7246 FAX: 310-792-4331 FAX: 202-737-2694 FAX: 203-275-6504 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO THE STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLANNING, PROGRAMMING AND MONITORING PROGRAM To the Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California We have examined management's assertion included in the Final Project Expenditure Report dated November 2, 2009, that the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) complied with the following requirements, which are identified in the Master Agreement Administering Agency -State Agreement for State Funded Projects and Fund Transfer Agreement and Project No. PPM07-6054 (044): • The reimbursement claims for the STIP Planning, Programming and Monitoring Program submitted to the State of California Department of Transportation were for expenditures for transportation purposes used in conformance with Article XIX of the California State Constitution. • The reimbursement claims submitted to the State of California Department of Transportation for the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Planning, Programming and Monitoring Program (Project No. PPM07-6054(044) is supported by payment vouchers and cancelled checks. • The charges for the various categories of eligible project costs incurred by RCTC are fully supported and recorded in RCTC's accounting records accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. • RCTC complied with CFR 49 Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for State and Local Governments, and OMB A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments. Such requirements are applicable to RCTC's reimbursement claim to the State Transportation Improvement Program, which are identified in the Final Project Expenditure Report dated November 2, 2009, for the period July 20, 2006 through November 2, 2009. Management of RCTC is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination. 21 Our examination was conducted in accordance with the attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting management's assertion about RCTC's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe our examination provides a basis for our opinion. In our opinion, management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the requirements established by the State of California Department of Transportation. The report is intended solely for the information and use of RCTC and the State of California Department of Transportation and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. liompaoa, eauf, Sazitio t% QOdoe nigd, YC Torrance, CA April 22, 2010 • • • 22 • • 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor • Riverside, CA Mailing Address: P. O. Box 12008 • Riverside, CA 92502-2208 (951) 787-7141 • Fox (951) 787-7920 • www.rctc.org Riverside Canny TranspirlWion (omission April 22, 2010 REPORT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION'S COMPLIANCE DECLARATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLANNING, PROGRAMMING AND MONITORING PROGRAM STATE AGREEMENT AND PROJECT NO. PPM07-6054(044) In connection with the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Planning, Programming, and Monitoring Program Fund Transfer Agreement and Project No. PPM07- 6054(044), we make the following compliance declarations: I. Reimbursement claims for the STIP Planning, Programming and Monitoring Program submitted to the State of California Department of Transportation were for expenditures for transportation purposes used in conformance with Article XIX of the California State Constitution. 2. The reimbursement claims submitted to the State of California Department of Transportation for the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Planning, Programming and Monitoring Program (Project No. PPM07-6054(044) are supported by payment vouchers and cancelled checks. 3. The charges for the various categories of eligible project costs incurred by RCTC are fully supported and recorded in RCTC's accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 4. RCTC complied with CFR 49 Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for State and Local Govermnents, and OMB A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments. 5. We have complied with all reporting and timing conditions required by the aforementioned agreement. 6. Total reimbursable costs associated with the STIP, Planning, Programming and Monitoring Program for the contract period July 20, 2006 through November 2, 2009 was $1,947,000. Anne Mayer, Ex e utive Director Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer 23 • AGENDA ITEM 8B • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Audit Ad Hoc Committee Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2008/09 Transportation Development Act and Measure A Audit Results AUDIT AD HOC COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Measure A audit results report for the FY 2008/09. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In March 2008, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. (MHM) was selected to perform the financial and compliance audits and agreed -upon procedures (audits) of Riverside County's TDA claimants and Measure A recipients, respectively, except for the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and the city of Beaumont. The RTA and the city of Beaumont audits were completed by their auditors. The FY 2008/09 audits represent the second year that MHM performed these audits for the Commission. The firm and the other agencies' auditors have completed the audits of and issued the audit reports for the local governments, non-profit agencies, and transit agencies that received TDA and Measure A funds, with the exception of Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) for Riverside County. The following is a summary of the audits performed: TDA Article 3 (bicycle and pedestrian projects) TDA Article 4 (transit) TDA Article 8 (local streets and roads) Measure A specialized transit Measure A local streets and roads Agenda Item 8B Total Type of Procedure Performed Financial and compliance audit Financial and compliance audit Financial and compliance audit Agreed -upon procedures Agreed -upon procedures 12 2 12 25 24 Following are highlights of the results of these audits: TDA Article 3 (Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects) • Seven jurisdictions have deferred revenues and/or fund balances aggregating $1,134,850 that have not been expended. Since funding is based on approved projects, remaining funds related to completed projects should be returned to the Commission. TDA Article 4 (Transit) • All transit operators met the fare ratio requirement. TDA Article 8 (Local Streets and Roads) • The city of Blythe has a fund deficit of $825,554, although Article 8 funds have not been approved since 2007, as funds are used primarily for transit needs. Measure A Specialized Transit • Questioned costs approximating $57,000 for amounts not included in the Measure A specialized transit funding agreements for five agencies were identified, and overhead costs for one agency exceeded the Commission's policy limit of 8% of revenues by approximately $5,000. • Five agencies did not meet the required cash or in -kind match requirement; two agencies did not meet their service goals. • For the third quarter performance reports tested, four agencies had minor discrepancies when comparing reported amounts to source documents. • Four agencies had excess funds approximating $38,377 as of June 30, 2009 that the Commission may request be returned. • Allocations for salaries and other expenditures for two Measure A specialized transit agencies are based on estimates or budgeted amounts rather than actual time spent. Measure A Local Streets and Roads • Three cities have fund balances that are in excess of three years of revenues. The Commission policy suggests that such amounts should not exceed three years. • Three cities have recorded indirect cost or overhead expenditures, which are not identified on the five-year capital improvement plans (CIP) approved by the Commission. The overhead charged by one of these cities is approximately 87% of the Measure A revenues it received and is considered excessive. Measure A policies require that expenditures should be identified on the five-year CIP and that overhead should not exceed 8% of revenues. Agenda Item 813 • 25 • Staff is in the process of resolving the significant matters and considering changes to policies and/or program administration. Attached is the summary of transportation and transit fund operations and related audit results for the various types of TDA (Articles 3, 4, and 8) and Measure A (specialized transit and local streets and roads) funding. Each schedule provides information for each claimant and recipient regarding the revenues, expenditures/expenses, and change in fund balance/net assets for the year ended June 30, 2009, and other financial and compliance information. Attachments: 7) FY 2008/09 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Schedule 2) FY 2008/09 Transportation Development Act Article 4 Schedule 3) FY 2008/09 Transportation Development Act Article 8 Schedule 4) FY 2008/09 Measure A Specialized Transit Schedule 5) FY 2008/09 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Schedule Agenda Item 8B 26 010Z!£Zl9 4£Z86 uop09S sluawatels lepueulj BDOZ =Loos £EL'04es - S LLS'8 S 9£8'Z9 S 699'14 S • $ 4601 S - S - $ 91.L'Z S S S ALMto pus Le eon Law.' pa4a100 v=711777= s f99o'i) $ £44'09e $ (r0L'4Lf s • $ - s ZZ£0'OE) s - $ • $ 4£E'El S 1e0A to pus le seouewq pun j I� 461'9 196'e 9Z6 E44'09E - (61.0'££Z) - (049.0Z) iea6 to 6uluu10aq le saoueleq pun j N (06e'4) • - luawlsnlpe pound Loud EtL'ZL (8E5's) (LOL'n) - (Zene) 61.0'£EZ 4L1.3.£ (*pun) Lan° Leelotsuett pue sanuanaito Vouaptop) sssox3 • Z09'gel • 69Z`Le (Ina) ul eietsueil etVZl (6E9'0 (LOL'4L) - (e£9'9LI) 6l0'EEZ (960'E) samepuedxa (Lapun) JBna son L anal to (houapuop) sseoxa LIZS9£ 009'Z8E 698'061. - 09Z'99 L(WOOL 440'49Z Z64'49 41.1.15Z Ol£'94 009'96 9E6'68 semllpuethefool 0£4'L6£ 196'£9e 696'061 - 09e99 000'96 640'L9Z 36149 Oern 8Ze'8LZ 009'96 049'96 senueneenol Etl'ZL l94't 049'E MOowtsewalul 9L senueneLLew° ts410 LL£'9e£S OD9'Z9E $ 698'0613 - $ 09e99 $ 000'96 $ 640'1.9Z S Z64'49 S OeZ'4L s El£'6LZ S 009'96 S 000'£6 $ £ oPIUV :suo imone letuewweno6ww! senuensa paw) papssl Ponssl Panssl panssl pangs! panssl pahssl panssi pains! penssl penssl apleilAnd oluper ues aplownw quad EepeA leweH seuuds euoto0 elle4oeo0 RllO luowneag 6uluueg to Atunoo ouston 10H Uaset] leJpe43e0 600Z'OS eunr pepug Joe), olnpo4os E •IoptV Tod wowdolanep uonepodsuerl 6 114111 H O`dlld • • 0LOZ/CZr9 Z 1N3WHOVIId 09Z66 UOU089 llgua goes AO pang srogpne ragV0 AO pslalduxw aram luouJnese pue tlya r0.1 sllpne agy l aloli slueweyel5 leloueuld 600e voinoS Iapl )eW )ayy levy leV4 wares eouelldwoo 001 red %E9'LF %t$•ei •_ °. r•ogel argil!envoy %8S'Ll %Z914 %00'0l %00'04 %00'0Z %00'04 4S00'0t one, elel pennbea Z89'499'0L $ 4/01409'9 $ 949'981 $ OLZ'E99'1. $ 099'904 $ 194'L04 S 99S`60L S rest to pue le enuana peuelep lelol ELE'9Z4'L LZL'L99'9 940'49 4S9'9ZE'4 941'99Z L91'1.01 LE9'ZB !ode° 8L4'9E4'E $ OS8'944 S 664'Z£4 S 644'9EE S SOS'61.1. S• S BEL'9l S Bummed° :Je0A la pue )e anuener pauale° 9L£'£►9'LE S Z£9'E90'LES 94£'419 $ 901'L94' 4 $ L0E'10' 4 $ 099'ZEE) S L£Z'6e S ueeA to pue le stress ION 944'8SS'S£ EL L'L99'£L L90'9Ll 9£►'9£e BZZ'4r0'Z (04►'£s8) 899'94Z reaA to BuiuulBeq le Nesse leN L9819Z'Z 099'491 V 841'962 ZL9S99 (ZZB'Z9) 4L9'0EL (l9E'LS4) (eseamep)esecuoulleN E84'699'9S 9E8'Strn £O8'4/0'V ELE'094'E 0E8'VE8'4 9ZZ'9S0'E 14E'64l'1 (esuedxs) enuenaJ 6ugeredouou goo/ 904'01e'l - 848'8E - 4e0'ZZ J9440 (E4L'61.) (01.L'SlS) (00S'4) Apedad to ales uo (ssop ule0 - Ono) u! sJalsuery CO (9S6'4SC) - (L99'Z£) - esuedxe Iseralul N LO 1'ZE► 999'99 9L9'£ LZS'69 69E'Z4 69 9/9'9 ewooul prevagul LS9'9L0'Z belle)? - - reg10 0001109'£ 199'9 000'04Z a uomsodaJd BLo'S9Z eso'9eL'Z • lleueo penlepede V emsem 094'LSI'9Z LSL'L£S'► - tr6L'l4G le ePad 9s0'LLS'E 99L'96L's £9tr'ZL4 o9L'E£Z 994'EL 989'EZ £LB$ eouelelsed lleusry elelS 9EL'lB9'9Z 489'LEE'LL 948'999 Z49'4/PT C84'L95'4 £1744£0'L 908'4E1'4 spunjuollalradeueryleooi :slue/0 :(sesuedxa) senuenel BugeredouoN (1£S'Se£'£S) (91Z'9£olz) (499'9LL) looVeZe'L) (L49'4ee'0 (95£'LE£'l) (Z8S'90E'4) sett!Sugmad° 994'4EZ'E9 Z4Z'8Ee'9Z 40Z'e99 E£9'994'e 999'99E'Z EBS'OLP'4 L08'934'4 sesuadxeSreeredo!Noy 89L'966'ES ECL'S49'LE L£L'£Z9 9Z4'989'E POS'LL8'L L9Z'9LE'L tr4£'ZLZ'I sssuedxeBupemdoreg)O 699'Z£Z'8 Ol l'496'e 494'6£ SOVOLZ ESO'S9L 90£'Z6 E9S'69L uogeauowe pue uogeloarde° sasuedxe Sugared° LZB'Sr9'9 S 496'46L'E $ L►S'L9 S ££9'S£E S 04L'1L£ S 6£Z'££L S SLE'OZL S penssl panssl penesi penss)penes! panes), panssl Vltl eulluns V1Md eplsrenia gum° )uownees Bupues 600E '0£ aunt papu3 AMA alnpeyas r luawdopmep uoyeyodsuery senuener 6ullerado !ere/ • • 040Z/£Z/9 (e) 00466 uol;oeS (tuueeq speeu;awun lenuue ue o;;oafgns ale AeLim apian oled Jo; suol;eoope g slow •spaau ensue.;;aaw o; pasn mou aye spun} dll algellene se 'hlemoedsai 'L864 Pue E664 ui papua Aapen eiimpeo0 pue ituunoo wa;sam ao} suoneoope 8 eloiuy :a;oN 5£b`£L4 $ (b59`5Z8)$ 996'894 (98L'£E9) 05b'b (89L`464) s;uewa;e;S ispueuiA 600Z :eomos JeaA }o pue;e saoueleq pun3 Jeeh }0 6uluul6eq;e saoueleq pund s;uew;snfpe pouad aoud sanwuadxe (Jepun) nano senuenel }o Vousmap) sseox3 89L`9Z4 sawn;lpuedxa le;ol 054'4 000'9EZ 05b'b sanueAeJ le;off awooul Isola ;ul 000'9£Z senueAal ALPO :suopeoope le;uawweno6Ja;ul :sanuenaq:{ penssi pen5si:. aPl3JeAla eUlA19 }o R;unoo woe'o£ eunp papua JeaA elnpayag 8 eloliJV;ay;uawdolenap uol;epodsueij. • E lN3WHOVIId •• • • Operating revenues: Measure A Interest income In -kind revenue Other revenue Total operating revenues Operating expenses -in kind Operating expenses -cash Capital expenditures Total operating expenses/capital expenditures Change in net assets Prior period adjustment Net assets at beginning of year Net assets at end of year Overhead costs Match requirement -cash Match requirement -in kind Actual match -cash Actual match -in kind Match requiemeM compliance status Source: 2009 Financial Statements Measure A Specialized Transit ATTACHMENT • Measure A Specialized Transit Schedule Year Ended June 30, 2009 Beaumont Adult Blindness School Support Boys 8 Girls Club of Southwest Care County Care -A -Van Connexxus Friends of Inland Moreno AIDS City of CASA Valley Project Norco Independen 1 Living Partnership Riverside County Regional Medical Volunteer Center Center Issued IssuedIssued Issued • Isstred 4,01$41(ijsk tssued jpEptsi4 $ 20,812 $ 75,112 $ 74,896 $ 231.524 $ 175,000 16,818 37,630 36,141 37,143 112.255 116,827 48,318 84,347 207,569 48,316 206,205 24,783 88,800 59,995 360,319 10,481 157,738 343,219 88,800 10,481 314,341 332,738 $ 47,772 $ 100,410 8,895 35.478 77,098 90,145 177,508 8,895 88,119 177,678 526 $ 73,116 $ 404,447 221 710,726 82,372 41,478 155,488 1,156,872 710,726 155,486 441,165 1Sssed $ 206,636 $ 192,353 293 142,615 251,564 - 456,200 335,26f 142,815 528,228 190,038 38,141 116,827 279,304 383,141 343,219 1,489 (4,572) (71,745) (22,822) (1) 1 4,572 79,859 3,450 $ 1.489 $ - $ 8,114 $ (19,372) $ $ 1,153 $ 1,086 $ 10,406 $ 16,818 $ • Mel $ 25,037 $ 85,747 $ $ 48.304 $ 37,143 $ 84,347 $ - $ 48,316 OW not meet Met cash; met in. kind- $ - $ 24,619 95,014 178,204 155,486 1,151,891 528.228 332,853 (4,869) (696) 2 4,981 (68,028) 2,608 (9,634) 87,897 4,695 (4,445) 21,783 68,028 9,038 $ 87,897 $ (174) $ (5,141) $ 2 $ 17,130 $ - $ 11,644 S - $ 8,927 $ $ 11,342 $ - $ 23,933 $ 30,274 $ 83,223 $ 37,000 3 104,000 $ 73,116 $ 16,633 $ 267,345 3 - $ 85,489 $ 7,020 $ 3,000 $ - $ - $ 153,109 $ - $ 142,815 $ 59,995 $ 157,738 $ 35,478 $ 77,098 $ 82,372 $ 41,478 $ 251,564 $ - $ 88,800 $ 10,481 $ 8,895 $ - $ • $ 710,726 $ $ 142,615 Met sash: did not meet In, Mat kind ::... Mel in-kaM, Old nos meet teen piquet meet Ga611 Motu;: Met Met Met 8/23/2010 30 OLOVerie l£ zlot my. of apesteeeleu vluawegris1 woo to soeeustupw 041V.Iyalxu tl amnap1808Lss1*i worinsgto poto.o ooui iooepo okL Pue' oyanyi aswuan .0p a41A9 pup'sapPiu lave A9 psSgewm sou wommo6 oispns syl, �W n ti*«��I;, Low sLo oresit eve'ee�9st mosso pit eez'oss'eS WP4 WN z 4 isW WN I814 ••OoYtC°.:lY�fimW NV1 Ete'SLL'6ES WN 9C4'1961.3 ee1'See S eer'96666S WN WN 010N len nn *nee Lis See'o6Zbt $ • $ • $ • s- s t• s- $- $ $• $• s- S • S 991,11L'LL LOO'LLE $ est'soe'r $ et4'£Le's t ete'see'et ess'Let'm1 rastele'ZLS ma'am a £91'OPE $ ISO '04t'L$ 999'SSO'9 S BY6'LieS zzL'COeS - S SLt'CSO'LS 66t'[LP '9$ 690'148'L t SELL El /90'SOL'L S n1149'1 OLL100 191'9891 911149 - 1.0/1W1 per eso'st PZe'9Let t 190'691'6L$ 09L'ee5t t EV6 CBS ZS OSetee'i 6901116 06Z1U t 1LO'SOL'OLS Z91'04l'C1.$ 613r$06 $ /49YSC t SSCOLL'Ct 299'969'9 t 441145S$ 195'91.6$ 4£A'Ot S BLE'0Bt'LS .. _... 90S`L241 01616L'1 6901991 eSOU '9 zorosez f tee'L9s's s • seem e $2917.01 LEP'rLL't 4e8'E9$ $ e61'se8'L$ 066'E990 $ 42/1,6 668'62 - • e£L'ete L25666 - 861.11. LLtalt OZ6'e9Lt ne9s t ozrsu'ts 666'21216 69011e'1. $ 666'441 690'11.61 L90'e91'eL t SSS'eto'S Se8'esite • B06.9LL Lee'eze'p e L9010L'2 t zoe'tee'zt 1to'soe's 06'6961 • • e • t - LL0'SOLbLt L10'S0L'OL $ eee'Oodf s • ism on sus seVeoe $ see zee t 996'OZL'Ct Mena, S yes reSS Lee'BLeS 6te'OSe'e Ser$06 - /09'LLL4e LeStroL PA9'P90 LSC'SL6 SSO'ePV9 • OL9'9L • ES4'P69 • S YEWSLZ S ME'S t LEW0L9 t 4fL'90 eSL 9s $ • $ Bt E'4BL'LS BLf's8L'L S $ 666'LL/St 620'146'L t LBO'692 C14 L90'SOL'E ! EPS Sae Et ILO '901'OL$ 69L'94L'CIS 6ez'6oe 91613et'e melee eLe'Letel efereto'Z 1.0ro6e6 616,16011 169'96911 t 0Se'ese t see'Ceet$ Zee'ee9'e t re6'299t /991921. 22£ 1.20't 1.6Z1001 60919E (98E'B6 l - sz0'itz sei'Le0'L 0.se'ZOe'l4 ez0690% tst'se ote'osz le t'ogo6) Bettye (so5'ese'L7 (Loo'OOE) (666'650 LeVeeL Le6'elet pfe9t. S 6L!'s6L'L$ 9OYiBL • L9✓BeL BOB'LZI. • esVe Kelm telesst 1999fBY ACL'Ael 06611C'E ;One 2CC'962 1,11212L 19911 fEL'Lee 'LS ELL'9E9 Serfs WW2 sores BB4'6£0 Lode OeVoLL E69'2911 SILO BLOB • /LOVLL • OCZ'S ►it's - eZCLss'LE [Keen se0'zso 4L4$Ztel 01.0'91•013 ne'LSO6 YESOLr 361:06S'9L OS L'e6e'L OCL'See 99291.i 99042 092129 EPE19 990'00 211'9 209119 t1.0'9Sr Lee'es56 - ele'eZelt sins t 1.00'L2Y1, S 1011913 t 9E2'009 t .:'upeneq. ponssl. 101SolL:. paltq erosual auPer uaS 0011osNy sLosd parasol ooioN 7.00.0661 Lffe'Lee'S Sena eereeZ Z10'94.2 seeY ZSZ'S 29066e'L seeteo'e t s8L'66s'6 te0Lb06 4 sLopinn AepsA seiryen • 9IN3WHOVIId Lortz4'e 66S'96e't 6se'eye 'P °ores LOO'BSYY Seg'See'L 0eetoi'l Zei'9601. eee'sz s0e'06 L60'i LL'L t e6e'roe't £trig zoi'8es terse toL'LZZ7 Ot8'£W't iseto5 SF l'L 1001L61 $ Palled POOR' **A - swWt13 e>le-1 1e0'e14 e00,00 17 rk°i z rx � �.:L2�.i•.k.�i�n�t`^t'�_'��C LLC'Lel. 965'4 • 9CL'L91$ oCz'SBL 0o0'Zl Wen 026199E KV,4 1S912L 4ailtLt ysi If eunseew M60.161019 lapusuld BOO! A s0S won; osuandumo 30n wi <to pui n 30141 M0,110 wnOW V Jew( 0 pus Ls OlOM of ameAsd styoN siusugssAul pus 4spo. psNsoes 0aA Aq ti0u0100 PUN Iswl L002 MOO BOOL :ponpoa useA Aq s0usleII pund 1.0u0twoo Rq sewtlrq puN Irw1 popLutSsopun •psvesaun da0da Uwo 10 spa(o.0 a0114P4Pods 101 Pe1e01te0 suosepdadds Swnus= lq Esussey ALP 1oi psuoaoy swell pledad 1oi peustey toouslglunouo »{ peoussey :ssottmoq pun; io sw000dwo0 AKA MAW $101009 pull wsAp Suluul6eq w seauslsq pun! 64pun0uLuouesn0+s p000o lopd sun Supuru$ wow our saNlPuedxi (ANN lino sonuens110 (Aousp9ap) neon $91'OBS 000009 einSLL soon Oupurue04lo pus se.onmusdxs pool • 892'LS lno woovelL Ise1Nu1 ROPupd :40uos pap suogeo0es peo4wn0 swims* puolssslow ps .10A0 sA9a1SI41,WPr 0410 uosessmwpe pus Suussw,0u3 000'009 666'1.09 sruauoiulow pus Loos:mm:4n :Tool elupUe4t wow our samllOosdn VC2109 OZL'edi'L senuaw level • u! tlepus0aalnGt Supueuo wLAO Lee 99S'eL toome mown tlnuena 1e410 • 9££'009 w 60096169.d 010ve 01.00w 11101) 6luewsangwley • 1i4q•V arisen 101'949 $ LEZ'LBS $ Vafrce8N :suopeooas ISWewwino8wryl sentiency owl steu9e0 WOLLNen Suluueg V 4k; `Cv 'i�01t s fI Jai�dl111 Mom,"„.). 6006'06 sun(' sopus.00A sIsP040$ spa021Pus wean 1e001 V unseen • • 010ZJCZJ9 Z to Z VM �W lew NP� ieW. low IeW rely leW NW t DZL Ltt'st E6t'si Z'LE f Bl99ES LE S o60'p8L'411 6 pool:car S L80'SEstas 6zt'S89 S LOC'en•I S C99'L0L'9S asl V OA PSgp cluewapts lapueuli 800Z :gsmoS grazes sousedwoo aon lee( LO pue Le 3Ow ttM'S la lunoLuV S - S - $ • s • S - S • S - S • S • S a'( in pus LP 01011 of elge('S SOWN Z99'ocVe t nesaL'it z0E'L86'1 f t08'669'L S 68L'90614 6 190309 S I. S CISS'SE! S LZO'06Z S 080.66E S slueugeenla Pue qa0 MS'490'0L S LPG 'Eat I 6 APS'.96L'2 S PPP 'Oft 'Sl LSL'409 S 9 S LS8'Ct9 S S6E909 S Wren S ' woes+ Jea( AA saausr$0 pun; RWl • 995.059 412'01,e5 LZC'000.0 909181 694'09 000Z LLC'YSVOI. t s90'9EL t ZCB'r99'z t PLLCSiz t L8z'909 t 9 $ z82'SLC 6 9/9'L90 S 98Z'as 6 600Z :pen!easJ Jes( (q sousing puns zzt'a9s'm t L98YLt'Lt C8r'98t't s Lsitet'L t meant' s LHL'909 t 9 . S Lents f 96C9o9 f 96z'8Z5 f lueuoduoa Aq saovage puny RRl LZC St'0L L96'ZLC'Z (wrest) (EEL'coL11 ces'eze 1.6610S S L88'clS MVOS Santa palau6l 1Na 'peuetage, • 099'001'6 Sande WS Jp =OW unnlMlPedS Ai PNeulS ac • OLL'691'L1 ZPL'L09'C1 • - suonepdudde Bugrwuoa Jae PeNe'ea • MOO al peueaa - OAS PROVO Jo} peueaa t• s 40L'ree'z 1 s 90L'009 t- t- S• t• t- f seouagwnoue Joe peuesey :sepueag pane 10 slosuodwa0 us s9Pb1 C LJat'LLC es Cep L6/'P t Los sec 1 t 4rr'OPl'91. t LOS 909 S 9 C Mg Cl9 1 BSC909 t NC OM f met ye pue is seousRg puns P9V1.0r1.z LZt'09CZ C99'9101/ C60'L6C'S LPL'P96'CL Leer.°vZ 9L6'LS 6/9'69S ELL 'KS LOWL99'1 NBA Jp 6ulwlesq R aaueleg pund • 1 C eupNgyiuelulmks payed MVO (LC81)08131) to0'LL6 0Lem (es9'LUB1 LOZ'tst'1 (tes'009.0 Cat' LC) (L96'99) (92L'9r) (1.19'9LL'LI sesn topueue$0410 Pus semlyuedae tiepin') Jane scnueso+Jp (Aouepeop) semord OZ9'SSW 'ZZ Bt0'rl4 Kn. Lt6 *LC '09L'C Zit 'atL OZ99099 099'LLZ toZ 19C 1PC'CO9 99900ZL tem e4.0u$00 JON° pus tNrrypuectfie swot LSC'6SC - OS9'ZLZ - 196'COS 051729 NO LIONLeJ1 KNOW' ledpuud raosues ago suOnaofie pakten° NO)Alet RuoMsyad panning ennese!ulu+py Jay* uoPe0sequIPe pert euyeaultua 0LS$9ttz roWas 9L6'aSt'C Z1.9'ari. 1131'81i1, 141'1.9C S91.191'2 Mueuaeulew PLro ratan4su00 :atn 6upueu8 Tana pug sednepuedx3 Z69'959.11 18 U! I,L0'90P'1 Lt6'159'L PLL'ECVL 111.606.E SES'091 ZSZ'9LE 919'L50 190'01,13 tenuoMJ WI • - 9L611Z ul eJepuagweunoe&ouns Alpo 969'LLf BZE'Lt 040'Zti 606'14.1 81164PC L6E'ct COL 199'21 C9O'LL LOWL1 MONO NONNI • 9L0'L - 9enueAm Je410 SOB'LB0 Bft'S9L'1 99012L GL8'6591 •JeyleJwNuaa 6oJd pluses RuoleN ny quumgwfoll . Jayp•V'Anew WO's/1%i t tc9'st9 s B NUS t LOB'LLZ'L t 014999'L t 009'az'L it 07roc S B9t'LOC C C99'9M t 61.Z'660'L $ yONOOOw l'OOPsaWs 14uawweno6J IN :omunea L99'/9 9rtk:;l..c/t�l opueylt 1 eLpN9 1 toAmnoo I 00944 OLpull 60049 Wed 9Ci090'L • PNOON gnP81 Pemsl PBnsPI. penal 'penal'. eese0 Wid OIPuI til$M ueglq seu05 a9ayae00 (HO E $ 600Z'OC soar Poem AIM oppeyo5 epeofd put ela+lf ONO1 V Nneee61 AGENDA ITEM 8C • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State Route 91 Traffic and Revenue Study Services WESTERN RIVERS/DE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 10-31-099-00 to Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) to provide an investment -grade traffic and revenue study for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP) for a base amount of $896,252, plus a contingency amount of $89,625, for a total not to exceed amount of $985,877; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work as may be required for the study. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Project Description The SR-91 CIP is part of the Commission's 2009 Measure A 10-Year Western Riverside County Highway Delivery Plan. The SR-91 CIP will widen the SR-91 freeway with a new general purpose lane from Interstate 15 to the Orange County line, improve ramps and local interchanges throughout Corona, reconstruct portions of the 91 /15 interchange, and extend the existing 91 Express Lanes (toll lanes) into Riverside County. Project Funding Plan The proposed project funding plan consists of three key sources: 1) Toff Revenue Bonds — Issued by the Commission and repaid from net project revenues. Agenda Item 8C 33 2) Transportation Infrastructure Finance and innovation Act (TIFIA) Loan Subordinate debt to the toll revenue bonds to be obtained by the. Commission from the US Department of Transportation TIFIA program and repaid from net project revenues. 3) Commission Contribution - To be funded by the Commission from Measure A sales tax revenues, both on a pay-as-you-go basis and through sales tax revenue commercial paper and bonds issued by the Commission. The successful sale of toll revenue bonds is dependent on many factors including the preparation of an investment -grade traffic and revenue study. This traffic and revenue study needs to support the Commission obtaining investment -grade toll revenue bond ratings from Moody's Investor Service (Moody's), Fitch Ratings (Fitch), and/or Standard & Poor's Rating Service (S+P). Selection Process A request for qualifications (RFQ) for consulting services associated with the development of an investment -grade traffic and revenue study for the SR-91 CIP was issued on May 11, 2010. The selection criteria in the RFQ included the following requirements and/or considerations: • Recent traffic and revenue studies that supported a bond issuer who has successfully obtained investment -grade toll revenue bond ratings from Moody's, Fitch, and/or S + P; • Recent experience in preparing traffic and revenue studies for high -occupancy toll or express lane projects; • Experience in performing work on projects of similar scope and complexity; • Knowledge of the SR-91 corridor, regional traffic, and adjoining toll facilities; and • Qualifications of project staff, particularly the project manager. Four firms - Halcrow Consulting, Inc. (Ha[crow), Hatch Mott MacDonald, Stantec, and Wilbur Smith Associates - submitted statements of qualification (SOQ) prior to the June 3 deadline. An evaluation committee was appointed to review the SOQs received and to conduct firm interviews. The evaluation committee members included representatives from Commission staff and the SR-91 CIP's financial advisory and project construction management teams. Based on the committee's evaluation of written SOQ submittals, and pursuant to the terms of the RFQ, the committee shortlisted two of the four offerors and invited those firms to the interview portion of the evaluation and selection process. The short listed firms included: Agenda Item 8C • 34 • • Stantec • Wilbur Smith Associates Interviews with the short listed firms were conducted on June 16, and after final scoring by the evaluation committee, Stantec was determined to be the most qualified among the two firms. The third and fourth most qualified firms were Halcrow and Hatch Mott MacDonald, respectively. Commission staff requested that Stantec submit a cost proposal and schedule of services for the development of an investment -grade traffic and revenue study for the SR-91 CIP. Subsequently, staff negotiated the scope (including the appropriate level of effort, labor categories/mix, etc.), cost, and schedule proposal submitted by Stantec for the project services and established a fair and reasonable price. A pre -award audit of Stantec's payroll, including overhead rates, and accounting system by a certified public accounting firm retained by the Commission is currently underway. The final negotiated price was deemed fair and reasonable based on an independent cost estimate, and a cost/price analysis conducted by staff, including comparison with similar services provided by firms on projects of a comparable size and complexity. Price negotiations resulted in a contract amount of $896,252. This reflects a nine percent cost savings from its initial proposal. Based on the foregoing evaluation process, staff recommends Stantec for contract award as it was determined to be the highest ranked firm among the four participating firms. Significant factors for this rating include the following: • Extensive and recent experience performing traffic and revenue studies both within the SR-91 corridor and throughout Southern California for the Commission, Orange County Transportation Authority, Transportation Corridor Agencies, San Bernardino Associated Governments, and San Diego Association of Governments; • Top notch, nationally -recognized experts in performing investment -grade traffic and revenue studies and experienced team assembled to provide services; • Superior understanding of the Commission's toll program, recent traffic and revenue study efforts for the Commission, and. SR-91 corridor demand and pricing relationships; and • Ability to immediately commence investment -grade work by using _the existing traffic and revenue model and related experience and resources. Utilizing existing traffic and revenue models that Stantec has developed for other agencies would minimize data collection costs, and could potentially result in overall cost savings to the Commission. Agenda Item 8C 35 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission award Agreement No. 10-31-099-00 to Stantec to provide an investment -grade traffic and revenue study for the SR-91 CIP. Further, staff recommends that the Commission authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission and authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the agreement. Final contract amount may change pending results of the pre -award audit. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2010/11 Amount: $ 985,877 Source of Funds: Commercial Paper and 2009 Measure A Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 003028 65520 00009 0000 262 31 65520 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \ 40 Date: 06/16/10 Attachments: 1) Exhibit A - Scope of Work 2) Exhibit B - Schedule 3) Exhibit C - Cost of Services Agenda Item 8C • 36 ATTACHMENT 1 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK WORK ELEMENTS The services requested by the Commission are itemized below and are intended to generally define work elements but are not intended to constitute a comprehensive list of all work items to be performed. Services to be performed by the Consultant shall include, but not be limited to, the following work tasks: Evaluate Data Analysis; Data Collection and Field Investigations The Consultant will compile and review all existing information regarding traffic levels and counts on State Route 91 in Riverside County (The Project) and other relevant highways and roadways affecting traffic in the SR-91 vicinity, including existing toll facilities in the region. The Consultant will collect and review all existing information regarding traffic levels and counts on State Route 91 in Riverside County (the Project) and other relevant highways and roadways that affect traffic patterns in the SR-91 corridor, including existing toll facilities in the region from RCTC, Riverside County Planning and Engineering Departments, local jurisdictions, and other agencies that may have collected recent and relevant traffic counts. By comparing the existing traffic information to the Project's data needs, the Consultant will identify additional data collection needs. The data will be compiled and analyzed for consistency and completeness; to identify any discrepancies in the data and identifying geographic areas (i.e., locations along the corridor) where the additional data will provide the most benefit. The Consultant will observe network and traffic patterns and trip characteristics and collect or supplement available travel time data on key links within the network. Field investigations will include origin/destination studies, stated preference surveys, license plate surveys and other data collection as necessary. Additionally the Consultant will obtain and incorporate the most current information available regarding future highway improvement programs for the Project and the corridor, including state and local plans. The Consultant will undertake the necessary supplemental traffic counting program in the SR-91 corridor, resulting in a more focused and accurate picture of traffic in the corridor. Permanent count stations (PeMS and Ca!trans Census stations) do not provide vehicle class information, which is crucial for toll revenue forecasting, and the speed data from the permanent count stations has not been calibrated or validated (not proven reliable). As such, it is expected that this Project will require additional mainline freeway traffic counts for the eastbound and westbound general purpose lanes at up to six different locations on SR-91 in Riverside County (and possibly on 1-15 or other relevant freeways). It should be noted that it is of particularly useful in HOT lanes studies to undertake a "radar" traffic count, which provides an accurate traffic count across multiple lanes, with the associated speed of traffic at the time of the count, and categorize the vehicles by vehicle length. The radar vehicle counts (categorized by vehicle -lengths) and speeds are available for each individual traffic lane in 5-minute intervals. This facilitates the evaluation of the relative volume/capacity ratios as well as revealing the times when demand 37 • • The following major tasks will be performed to support the traffic and revenue forecasting effort: 1. Data Assessment. Demographic forecast inputs adopted by RCTC, OCTA, SCAG and other regional forecasting services (both private and public) have different time periods and. socioeconomic factor disaggregation. As such, demographic inputs specifications will be established, all existing data resources will be reviewed and assimilated including the forecasting work used in prior financings for related facilities, a "major issue" list will be prepared to provide focus to data gathering, analysis and forecasting, and an interview list will be prepared. The foregoing will be accomplished through client meetings, field trips and review of documentation. 2. A forecast for a base year and designated future years for the region and for the sub -regional planning areas will be prepared. The forecast will consider officially adopted forecasts (and all associated assumptions about future events and conditions embedded in those forecasts), forecasts by other units of State govemment, national and local forecasting services, universities and financial institutions. Long-term trends on job and households formations and income will be considered as will historical responses of the economy to business cycles. Particular attention will be focused on current economic conditions reflected in the base year and the impending economic recovery expected to span into the 2010 to 2015 forecast increment. 3. The foregoing will be supplemented by an interview program reaching economic development departments, major employers, real estate professionals, and other related organizations to develop an understanding of business expansion or contraction plans and the considerations affecting them. Interviews will also be conducted with major real estate brokerage houses and developers to provide first hand information on market operations, location considerations, and constraints to future development of residential and non-residential properties, and active and planned projects that will directly impact traffic in the corridor. 4. Public policy initiatives that will directly and materially impact future land use pattems and intensity will be reviewed and their implications documented and factored into forecasts. 5. The Consultant will make appropriate sub -regional and TAZ assignments for those characteristics specified by the traffic and revenue model. The assignment process will utilize the regional forecast framework established in Work Step 2 and all data and information developed in Work Steps 3 and 4. Importantly, the methodology assesses the values contained in the traffic model inputs, and makes adjustments by TAZ on an exception basis where warranted. This is an iterative process where the reasonableness of small area assignments are continually tested against sub regional and regional control totals. 39 Refine Traffic Model • The Consultant will develop a transportation model incorporating trip tables, network assumptions, diversion methodology and other factors. The available regional traffic models — OCTAM, RivTAM and SCAG — are of very special interest and utility. OCTAM was developed by OCTA, and has been modified by the Consultant over time to accommodate the special needs of toll diversion into the model set-up. The regional model has multiple time periods, and is adequate for the estimation of toll traffic and revenue. Corridor volumes and characteristics will be reviewed from initial outputs of the regional model. Adjustments to the model to reflect toll imposition and commercial vehicle attributes will also be developed. This is a particularly complicated process because the HOT lanes and general purpose lanes are so close that the choice between them at any time is obvious. This effort assumes up to three design altematives (with varying ingress -egress points) with two model years for each alternative. 1. Evaluate available model plafforms — review validation reports and user documentation. Interested in specifics on time of day modeling, vehicle classes and toll implementation. • RivTAM — Riverside County Traffic Analysis Model, developed in 2009 in TransCAD. Uses the SCAG regional model inputs and parameters with refined zone structure and roadway network.. • RCTC model platform used for the SR 91 study completed by PB. • OCTAM version 3.3 model platform as modified by Stantec. 2. Possible Model Enhancements • Three vehicle types — SOV, HOV 2 & HOV 3. HOV 3 free on SR 91. (Will also explore how commercial vehicles are handled in model stream) • Review and revise, if possible, time of day factors • Review and revise, if possible, peak spreading factors • Review and revise, if possible, value of time parameters (cost & time coefficients) • Implement highway assignment/toll diversion using CUBE. 3. Incorporate base and future year socioeconomic forecasts into model stream 4. Incorporate background network improvements for 2010, 2020 and 2035 focusing on the SR 91 corridor within Riverside County. • Meet with staff at RCTC to obtain and review information on current and proposed projects in the study area. • Review additional projects contained in SR 91 Implementation Plan and SR 91 Corridor Improvement Plan • Review base year network (2010) for completeness and revise if necessary • Code future year projects into background networks for 2020 and 2035 40 • • • 5. Validate base year (2010) model by time period (AM, PM, Midday and Night) • Develop a series of screen -line locations for validation purposes, including toll locations at Windy Ridge and on SR 91 HOT lanes. Use counts collected as part of the project and any other reliable, available data within the Project corridor. Market Share Analysis The Consultant team will develop a market share analysis for the Project. The Consultant has extensive experience with HOT lanes projects throughout North America, including Califomia, Texas, Colorado, and Virginia. In particular, through its long term involvement with SR-91, a substantial database of HOT lane usage and revenue potential under a range of traffic and toll conditions has been assembled. From these data, a series of "market share curves" denoting splits between tolled HOT lanes and adjacent general purpose lanes has been calculated. This information is particularly helpful in the preliminary testing of alternative toll concepts and in the preliminary evaluation of related operating policies. Traffic and Revenue Model Development The Consultant will forecast annual traffic by vehicle type and compute toll revenues for the planned 50 year toll facility term for the Base Case that reflects the most probable usage under prevailing conditions. The final results of all the prior work efforts is to provide a project of first the traffic conditions in the corridor for each alternative and secondly, the revenue associated with each alternative. For this project, it will begin with the regional traffic model which will be used to create the hourly traffic demand for the project from the market share curves. These estimates will be refined by the use of the micro -simulation model, all of which will then be used to create projections of traffic and revenue. Sensitivity Analyses In consultation with the Commission, the Consultant will perform a number of sensitivity analyses to test the revenue impact of changes in various assumptions. It is envisioned that a scoio-economic and value of time analysis would be performed to determine the likely range of toll revenue forecast that the Project could potentially capture under differing scenarios. The Consultant will evaluate broad systematic sensitivities as well as localized detailed areas of revenue sensitivity all which are meant to provide the financial community with a sense of how the model works and what sort of envelope within which the forecast is meant to operate. Toll Pricing Methodology The Consultant will advise the Commission regarding the appropriate toll pricing regime and methodology that takes into account the congestion pricing concept of the SR-91 corridor and the toll pricing regime of the existing 91 Express Lanes. HOT lanes and managed lanes rely on a development of operating policy during the initial development. As shown in practice among the various HOT lanes in operation today, these policies are widely variable. Critical among the policy decisions to make are: 41 • Likely users ( transponders only, video use, identification of HOV+ customers) • Access to lanes ( direct connectors versus weaving ingress/egress) • Pricing policy (static variable (as in SR 91, below) versus dynamic (as I-15)) • Relationship of traffic to toll rates; typically most HOT lanes use the pattems of traffic to establish the value of the toll by hour. Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Report The Consultant will deliver am Investment Grade Traffic Report, first as a Draft for RCTC team review and then as a Final, for use as part of the financing for the project Meetings and Presentations Meetings will be held during the course of the Project; budget for such meetings during the development of the Project and prior to the delivery of the Traffic and Revenue report are included within each work task. Meetings with the financial community (rating agencies, insurers, etc.) are not included within the attached budget and will be handled on a time and materials basis • • 42 • • • EXHIBIT B - SCHEDULE Table 1 RESOURCE STAFFING SCHEDULE Hours per week by firm ATTACHMENT July 'August 'September 'October 'November 'December 'January 'February (March (April 'May Rune ' Week U 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 32 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Hours Task per Task Review of existing data Review existing traffic data Stantec 12 12 22 12 22 2. 73 Review other avail documents Stantec 22 12 22 22 22 12 72 Review socioeconomic data Stantec 4 4 4 a 4 4 4 4 e 4 4 4 48 local PB 24 24 24 24 24 24 145 national — PB 23 23 23 23 23 23 138 existing and future land use _...._.._ PB m O 92 92 92 92 45 45 551 Additional data collection planning Stantec 36 16 16 16 16 16 ORS 22 22 22 22 22 22 surveys traffic Stantec 73 n 22 n DNS 40 40 40 au surveys a/d Stantec 22 22 23 22 DNS 32 32 32 32 Survey summarization Stantec 26 26 26 26 DNS 21 21 23 21 Model development existing validation Stantec 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 Base Year Model and Calibration Report Stantec 64 64 64 64 64 54 DNS 27 22 n 27 27 22 toll equations - Stantec 56 56 56 56 Revenue 5O1-e89973 future models Stantec optimization of tolls Stantec Preliminary Forecasts Stantec Sensitivities Stantec Microsimulation Stantec Toil Pricing Methodolody Stantec Final Report Rating Agency TOTAL HOURS 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 45 45 45 45 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 96 132 108 160 108 128 104 82 288 384 160 224 240 180 59 59 59 59 59 296 59 59 59 59 236 280 120 Stantec 53 58 56 58 232 PB 32 32 32 32 128 DRS Stantec fib 66 132 PB 48 46 96 DNS Stantec 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 R R R 8 PB a DNS 43 n 0 r n 8 3,220 1.058 0 662 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • EXHIBIT C - CPOF SERVICES Table 2 Summary of Costs and Range of Rates ATTACHMENT 3 • Hours Salary Costs Overhead Costs Fixed Fee Costs Salary Total Direct Costs TOTAL Stantec 3,220 $ 176,443 $ 304,594 $ 48,104 $ 529,141 $ 19,550 $ 548,691 PB 1,058 $ 52,210 $ 84,214 $ 13,642 $ 150,067 $ 46,000 $ 196,067 DKS 662 $ 34,630 $ 61,256 $ 9,589 $ 105,475 $ 46,020 $ 151,495 TOTAL 4,940 $ 263,283 $ 450,065 $ 71,335 $ 784,682 $ 111,570 $ 896,252 Stantec Parsons Brinckerhoff DKS Principal Project Manager Sr Engineer/Planner Project Engineer/Planner Assoc Engineer/Planner Technician From $ 90.00 $ 50.00 $ 60.00 $ 40.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 Range of Hourly rates To $ 120.00 $ 75.00 $ 105.00 $ 55.00 $ 45.00 $ 40.00 From To Principal $ 60.00 $ 110.00 Project Manager $ 40.00 $ 60.00 Consultant $ 40.00 $ 60.00 Associate Consultant $ 25.00 $ 40.00 Senior Supervising Planner $ 50.00 $ 80.00 Supervising Planner $ 40.00 $ 65.00 Senior/Lead Planner $ 30.00 $ 60.00 From To Principal $ 45.00 $ 90.00 Project Manager $ 40.00 $ 70.00 ITS Specialist $ 45.00 $ 70.00 Sr Engineer/Planner $ 35.00 $ 60.00 Associate Engineer/Planner $ 30.00 $ 45.00 Assistant Engineer/Planner $ 20.00 $ 35.00 Graphics Designer $ 20.00 $ 35.00 CAD/GIS Specialist $ 20.00 $ 35.00 .Engineering Technician $ 15.00 $ 30.00 Administrative Assistant $ 15.00 $ 35.00 Accounting $ 20.00 $ 45.00 44 • AGENDA ITEM 8D • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs And Projects Committee Khalid Bazmi, Toll Project Manager Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement for On -Call Strategic Partnership Advisor Services with KPMG Corporate Finance, LLC WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 06-66-026-08, Amendment No. 7 to Agreement 06-66-026-00, for toll feasibility and strategic partnership advisor services with KPMG Corporate Finance, LLC (KPMG) for the Interstate 15 Corridor Improvement Project (1-15 CIP) for the amount of $250,000; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In February 2006, the Commission entered into an agreement with KPMG for the purpose of providing strategic partnership advisor services for project financing alternatives and evaluation of potential toll road corridors in Riverside County. The project approval and environmental document (PA/ED) work phase completion for the SR-91 and 1-15 CIPs is scheduled for 2011 and 2012, respectively, under separate agreements with engineering firms. During the last 18 months, KPMG has completed the following. tasks: • Performed level one and level two toll feasibility analyses for the SR-91 CIP and level one toll feasibility analysis for the 1-15 CIP; • Financial analysis for the potential development of a public -private partnership (P3) on the SR-91 CIP to enhance revenue producing opportunities; and Agenda Item 8D 45 • Analysis of financial modeling scenarios for the SR-91 CIP including an availability payment model. The continued services of KPMG are desirable to support the PA/ED work and to assist the Commission in successfully moving these projects forward into the design, construction, and operation phases. The major tasks of KMPG's scope of work will include: • Providing financial analysis to assess project feasibility and subsequent transaction structuring; • Periodic updating of financial analyses to confirm viability of 1-15 CIP as cost and project scope are developed and updated. These analyses typically include reviews of revenue, cost, and schedule inputs from the engineering team; modifications to the financing strategy; and changes to the project phasing or scope and sensitivity runs to determine the impact of variances in demand, construction costs, and general inflation; • Providing level two toll feasibility analysis for several sections of the 1-15 CIP, including: Area A-Cajalco Road to Hidden Valley Parkway, Area B- EI Cerrito Road to SR-60, and Area C-Indian Truck Trail Road to Hidden Valley Parkway; and • Preparing financial analysis for the potential development of a P3 on the 1-15 CIP to enhance revenue producing opportunities. The additional financial advisory services required and outlined above will be provided by KPMG for $250,000. Staff anticipates expending this amount through FY 2010/11. The amount is included in the FY 2010/11 budget. This will bring the total contract amount to $1,474,736. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2010/11 Amount: $250,000 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 003027 00000 0000 262 31 65520 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \A6vi Date: 06/16/10 Attachment: Draft Agreement No. 06-66-026-08 Agenda Item 8D • • • 46 Agreement No. 06-66-026-08 AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT FOR STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ADVISOR SERVICES 1. PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement for Strategic Partnership Advisor Services is made and entered into this day of , 2010 by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("Commission") and KPMG Corporate Finance LLC ("Consultant"). 2. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into an agreement dated February 8, 2006 for the purpose of providing Strategic Partnership Advisor Services (the "Master Agreement") for a total compensation of $ 200, 000. 2.2 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Master Agreement, dated November 14, 2006 for the purpose of providing additional compensation ($105,000) for the ongoing provision of Strategic Partnership Advisor Services and extending the term of the Master Agreement until January 31, 2008. 2.3 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Master Agreement dated February 14, 2007 for the purpose of providing additional compensation ($340,000) for the ongoing provision of Strategic Partnership Advisor Services. 2.4 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 3 to the Master Agreement dated January 31, 2008 for the purpose of extending the term of the Master Agreement until February 9, 2012. 2.5 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 4 to the Master Agreement dated July 11, 2008 for the purpose of making consulting services available to the San Bernardino Associated Governments through the Master Agreement. 2.6 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 5 to the Master Agreement dated November 12, 2008 for the purpose of KPMG Amendment No. 7 (RCTC Doc. No. 06-66-026-08) Page 1 47 providing additional compensation ($250,000) for the ongoing provision of Strategic Partnership Advisor Services. 2.7 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 6 to the Master Agreement dated October 28, 2009 for the purpose of providing additional compensation ($329,736) for the ongoing provision of Strategic Partnership Advisor Services. 2.8 The parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement to provide additional compensation for the continued provision of Strategic Partnership Advisor Services, as described in Attachments #1, #2, #3, and #4, hereto. TERMS 2.9 The maximum compensation under the Master Agreement, as previously amended, is hereby increased by Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000). 2.10The total contract value for the Master Agreement, as heretofore amended, shall not exceed One Million, Four Hundred and Seventy Four Thousand, Seven Hundred Thirty Six Dollars ($1,474,736). 2.1 1 Consultant shall continue to provide the Services described in Attachments #1, #2, #3 and #4, hereto, as directed by the Commission. 2.12"Section 3.12.6 is amended to read as follows: Section 3.12.6 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences." 2.13Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Master Agreement, as amended by Amendments No. 1 through No. 6, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment. KPMG Amendment No. 7 (RCTC Doc. No. 06-66-026-08) Page 2 48 • • • SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT FOR STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ADVISOR SERVICES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Agreement on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY KPMG Corporate Finance TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION LLC By: Bob Buster, Chair Signature APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Best, Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel Name Title KPMG Amendment No. 7 (RCTC Doc. No. 06-66-026-08) Page 3 49 • KPMG Contract #06-66-026-08 Scope of Work, Amendment #7 Section 1. Tasks. As a member of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) tolling team, KPMG will participate and advise as appropriate regarding the following tasks: 1 Workshops, conference calls or meetings with RCTC and other members of the tolling team to further define the project(s) and assist in analyzing potential development approaches. 2 Work with RCTC staff and other members of the tolling team to analyze the I-15 and/or other requested project(s) using the "base case" procurement model (i.e., Design -Build) selected by RCTC for assessment. • In consultation with RCTC staff and other members of the tolling team, analyze a preliminary financing strategy based on associated assumptions from similar projects. • Obtain inputs developed by other members of the project teams and incorporate them into the financial analysis. Inputs that will need to be provided include timing of phases, anticipated traffic and revenue, capital costs, operating costs. • Review all assumptions and inputs with RCTC and receive approval of such inputs and assumptions. • Undertake financial analyses to assess the estimated public sector contribution to the project(s). Refine and/or update the financial analyses, as requested by RCTC. 3 As requested, perform sensitivity analysis of the key base case analysis assumptions, for example, changes in demand (revenue), interest rates and costs. 4 Work with RCTC staff and other members of the tolling team to analyze the 1-15 and/or other project(s) using one or more "P3" procurement model(s) (e.g., DBFOM, DBFO, DBFM) selected by RCTC for assessment. • In consultation with RCTC staff and other members of the tolling team, analyze a preliminary financing strategy based on associated assumptions from similar projects. • Obtain inputs developed by other members of the project teams and incorporate them into the financial analysis. Inputs that will need to be provided include timing of phases, anticipated traffic and revenue, capital costs, operating costs. • Undertake financial analyses to assess the estimated public sector contribution to the project(s). Refine and/or update the financial analyses, as requested by RCTC. 5 As requested, perform sensitivity analysis of the key P3 analysis assumptions, for example, changes in demand (revenue), interest rates and costs. 6 Draft reports and presentations regarding results of financial analyses. (See Section 3. Deliverables, below.) 7 Participate in calls, meetings, and/or workshops to discuss results. 50 8 Assist in the development of preliminary schedules for project delivery, including pre - procurement and procurement. 9 Assist in identifying near -term, mid-term and long-term issues, steps and "to-do" items that are consistent with preliminary project schedules. 10 Undertake any other agreed -to activities related to the project(s) directed by RCTC as provided for within the budget identified in Attachment 3. Section 2. Client Participation and Responsibilities. During the development of this Statement of Work, we have been guided by certain assumptions about the project scope, and level of RCTC's involvement and support. 2.1. RCTC. Support. We will require the support of RCTC's personnel in order to achieve timely completion of the project. Support includes, but is not limited to, the collection of all relevant documents (paper or electronic) and the scheduling of and coordination of meetings. 2.2 Project Management. RCTC will designate a management level individual to oversee the conduct of this project, including coordination of RCTC resources needed and review of draft deliverables. RCTC personnel assigned to the project will review draft deliverables on a timely basis. Section 3. Deliverables At the request of RCTC, KPMG shall provide draft summaries of the results of each financial analysis, in writing, whether as a separate deliverable or as part of a collaborative work product with RCTC and/or other technical and legal advisors. The draft deliverables will be provided to RCTC for review, comment and approval prior to final delivery. KPMG may send final reports/deliverables electronically for RCTC's convenience. However, only the final hard -copy report should be viewed as our work product. The deliverables presented as part of this engagement are for the internal use of RCTC and are not to be relied upon by third parties, in whole or in part, or used for any other purpose. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise the observations whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Should additional documentation or other information become available which impacts upon the observations reached in our deliverables, we reserve the right to amend our observations and summary documents accordingly. Section 4. Other Matters. KPMG will provide our services in accordance with the terms and conditions of Statement of Work. Such services are not intended to be an audit, examination, attestation, special report or agreed -upon procedures engagement as those services are defined in American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) literature applicable to such engagements conducted by independent auditors. Accordingly, these services will not result in the issuance of a written communication to third parties by KPMG directly reporting on financial data or internal control or expressing a conclusion or any other form of assurance. 51 • • • KPMG Contract #06-66-026-08 Schedule, Amendment #7 KPMG will perform the scope of work in time -frame consistent with the schedule for analysis requested by RCTC. This schedule for the 1-15 Project Study Area B is described in Attachment #3. The schedule for additional analyses will be determined upon RCTC's request. 52 KPMG Contract #06-66-026-08 Project Budget, Amendment #7 verside County Transportation Com ni issicn MG 2010.11 Workplan and Budget 5 Project ",Y 1 r. Ti-Lt, �Y'.4..�Af Reconcile input (review, identity issues discuss with team; review wry changes) June 1.0 3.0 5.0 90 Perform preliminary cash flow analysis June 2.0 2.0 5.0 9.0 Compile financing assumptions for client review and approval June 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 Model refinements to incorporate 3 separate project phases June/July 0.0 5.0 20.0 25.0 Perform financial analysis July 0.0 5.0 100 15.0 Quality control review of financial analysis July 0.0 50 00 5.0 Summaize results of analysis and prepare presentation July 0.0 5 0 10.0 150 Senior review of presentation draft/ update presentation to reflect comments Jury 2.0 20 2.0 6.0 ReNew draft presen[alion of results with project advisor teem: revise as needed July 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 Conference call / meeting to present and discuss results M obtain diem direction for next steps July 6.0 3.0 0.0 9.0 Other related activities (review /communications) July/August 5.0 5.0 0.0 10.0 Follow up analysis/meetings August 18.0 12.5 7.5 38.0 Contingency (2S%) 9.5 12.9 15.9 383 Total 47.5 64A 79A 191.3 I Applicable hourly billing rates• $555 $400 $320 Est(erated7fourlyFell _ , m "-':' f: 26,3F65. ,$ "25.750 -i 26.490 S 7 73, g "[S llYL� i �'AT: Reconcile input (review. Identify issues:discuss with team; review any changes) 1.0 �30 5.0� 9.0 Perform preliminary cash flow analysis 2.0 2.0 6.0 9.0 Compile financing assumptions for client review and approval 1.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 Perform financial analysis 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 Quality control review of financial analysis 0.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 Summarize results of analysis and prepare presentation 00 5.0 10.0 150 Senior review of presentation draft/ update presentation to reflect comments 20 2.0 2.0 6.0 Review draft presentation of results w lth project advisor team; revise as needed 2.0 2.0 20 60 Conference call/ meeting to present and discuss results and obtain client direction for next steps 8.0 4.0 00 12.0 Other related activities(review/ communications) 5.0 5.0 0.0 /0.0 Follow up amysis/meetings 18.0 12.5 7.5 38,0 Contingency RS%) 9.8 11.9 10.9 32.5 Total 48.8 59A 54.4 162.5 Applicable hourly billing rates 5555 5400 $320 ., Eitlmeted Nourliceee• .. _ , u .- " . _ ., , 5 275056_ 4-2$,150 , -C411;400 $ ;8$ 6S'.-- 'fEs0Rialted tiaF=i't5Troject(Stutly410WX;W ,x ,".- a.- 1. ^^---- -.L $'_. JO'S#:49:500 `ty4,400 5' 4.5,739-.,; Other Analyses Discuss project objectives and P3 pemmeterswith client and project team Facilitate client consideration of tisk valuation methodology / approach Compile P3 financing and lex assumptions for client review and approval Update financial model for P3 structure I perfemm analyses Quality control review of financial model adjustments Summarize results of analysis and prepare presentation Senior review of presentation Matt / update presentation to reflect comments Review drag presentation of results with project advisor team; revise as needed Conference call / meeting to present and discuss results and obtain client direction for next steps Other related activities (review /communications) Follow up analysis / meetings 25% contingency Total 5.0 5.0 5.0 1 D.0 10.0 5.0 8.0 12.0 6.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 10.0 7.5 3.0 30 20 2.0 8.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 20.0 /2.5 7.5 17.8 22.8 18.4 BfiB 113.8 91.9 15.0 3.0 2.0 15.0 25.0 26.0 600 10.0 22.5 9.0 6.0 12.0 10.0 40.0 58.9 294.4 Applicable hourly billing 55 $400 $320 Fatim ated HourlyFeee 3 49,256 s ):4000 F 29,500- 5 12A151 Total All Analyses Estimated Total Hours 185.0 237.5 225.6 668.1 Estimated Total Buda at for Hourly Fees: $ - 102A75 95,000 $ 72,200 5- 269,875... :`loss Estimated Carry-over Balance from FY2005,10 Budget $ 39,875 Pius Budget for Reimbursement : ofOuf-ol-Pecket Expenses s 2000 Eatimatetl Thal Budget' for FY?O1Gd1(FeesanOBtpensea( $ :250,000.>. Rates reflect FY 2010-11 discounts. See Attachment d4 for details_ 53 KPMG Contract #06-66-026-08 Schedule of Rates, Amendment #7 Managing Director / Partner * Director / Senior Manager Associate Director / Manager Associate / Senior Associate * $ 555.00 $ 515.00 $ 400.00 $ 320.00 * For FY 2010-11 Rates, Managing Director/Partner rate has been reduced from $595 per hour to $555 per hour and Associate / Senior Associate rate has been reduced from $325 to $320 per hour. The total discount resulting from these changes is estimated to be approximately $9,000 for the budget in Attachment #3. 54 i AGENDA ITEM 8E • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2010 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2010 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2002, AB 1010 authored by former Assemblyman Lou Correa allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise from the California Private Transportation Company. The purchase agreement was completed in January 2003, at a cost of $207.5 million. AB 1010 also eliminated the existing non -compete clause in the franchise agreement that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. SB 1316 passed in August 2008, authorized the Commission to impose tolls for 50 years on transportation facilities on its portion of SR-91, and authorized toll revenues to be used for constructing and operating toll facilities on SR-91 in Riverside County. The purchase of the 91 Express Lanes and the elimination of the non -compete clause has allowed much needed improvements to be planned and implemented within the SR-91 corridor. OCTA, the Commission, and Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 have been coordinating these improvements. SB 1316 required creation of a new advisory committee with specific responsibilities appointed by board members from OCTA and the Commission. SB 1316 also required the continuation of annual updates of an implementation plan of SR-91 improvements for the Legislature. As spelled out in the legislation, the 2010 State Route 91 Implementation Plan was completed by OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and the Commission, and details proposed projects and completion schedules for transportation improvements to Metrolink, express bus, freeways and interchanges, new east -west highway corridors, and high-speed rail. Attachment: 2010 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Agenda Item 8E 55 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: 2010 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE 1 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 7 BY YEAR 2013 g BY YEAR 2015 11 BY YEAR 2023 16 BY YEAR POST-2025/2030 21 SECTION 3: COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS 27 SECTION 4: REFERENCES 30 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 57 • SECTION 1: 20 1 0 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE • INTRODUCTION Previous law authorized the Califomia Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to enter into franchise agreements with private companies to construct and operate four demonstration toll road projects in Califomia. This resulted in the development of the 91 Express Lanes facility in Orange County. The four -lane, 10-mile toll road runs along the median of the Riverside Freeway (State Route 91) in northeast Orange County between the Orange/Riverside County Line and the Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55). Since the 91 Express Lanes carried its first vehicle on December 27, 1995, the facility has saved users over 32 million hours of commuting time. While the 91 Express Lanes facility has improved travel time along the State Route 91 (SR-91) corridor, provisions in the franchise agreement between Caltrans and the private franchisee, the California Private Transportation Company (CPTC), prohibited Caltrans and county transportation agencies from adding transportation capacity or operational improvements to the SR-91 corridor from the Ontario Freeway (Interstate 15) in Riverside County to the Orange/Los Angeles Counties border through the year 2030. Consequently, the public agencies were barred from adding new lanes, improving interchanges, and adding other improvements to decrease congestion on the SR-91 freeway. Recognizing the need to eliminate the non -compete provision of the franchise agreement, Governor Gray Davis signed Assembly Bill 1010 (Lou Correa) (AB 1010) into law in September 2002, paving the way for much - needed congestion relief for thousands of drivers who use SR-91 to travel between Riverside and Orange Counties each day. The bill allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise and eliminate the existing clause that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. The purchase agreement for the 91 Express Lanes was completed in January 2003, placing the road in public hands at a cost of $207.5 million. With the elimination of the non -compete provision through AB 1010 and the subsequent 91 Express Lanes purchase by the OCTA, Orange County and Riverside County public officials. and Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 have been coordinating improvement plans for SR-91. Senate Bill 1316 (Lou Correa) (SB 1316) was signed into law in August 2008 as an update to the provisions of AB 1010. SB 1316 authorizes OCTA to transfer its rights and interests in the Riverside County portion of SR-91 toll lanes by assigning them to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and authorizes RCTC to impose tolls for 50 years. SB 1316 also requires OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and RCTC, to annually issue a plan and a proposed completion schedule for SR-91 improvements from State Route 57 (SR-57) to Interstate 15 (1-15). The previous SR-91 Implementation Plan included a westerly project limit of State Route 55 (SR-55). This plan establishes a program of projects eligible for funding by the use of potential excess toll revenue and other funds. This 2010 SR-91 Implementation Plan (Plan) is the result of the requirement to provide the State Legislature with an annual Implementation Plan for SR-91 improvements and builds on the 2009 report, which was a major update of the previous annual Implementation Plans. This year's update includes projects identified in the Riverside County — Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as well as other project development efforts and funding programs such as the RCTC 10-Year Westem County Highway Delivery Plan that outlines a number of projects such as the extension of High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes from the Orange/Riverside County Line to 1-15, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) that provides a funding source for transportation projects, the extension of the Measure A program that provides funding for transportation projects in Riverside County, and the Renewed Measure M program that provides funding for transportation projects in Orange County. The 2010 Plan includes an overview, identification of issues and needs, time frames for project packages to improve mobility on SR-91, and are listed based on a logical sequence for 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 58 implementation. Project descriptions include conceptual lane diagrams (as appropriate), cost estimates (in 2009 dollars, or as noted), and discussion of key considerations that need to be addressed in the planning and development of each project. This plan will provide OCTA, RCTC, and Ca!trans with a framework to implement SR-91 and other related improvements. Future annual plan updates will continue to refine the scope, cost, and schedule of each project included in this version of the plan. SR-91 CORRIDOR CONDITIONS Project Limits The project study limits encompass the segment of SR-91 from west of the junction of SR-57 and SR-91 in the City of Anaheim in Orange County, to east of the junction of SR-91 and 1-15 in the City of Corona in Riverside County. The freeway segment is approximately 20.3 miles long, and includes approximately 12.7 miles within Orange County and approximately 7.6 miles within Riverside County. Traffic Conditions Summary A review of traffic conditions in the Corridor indicates that the existing carrying capacity of the facility is inadequate to accommodate current and future peak demand volumes, and that Level of Service (LOS) F prevails in the peak direction during the entire peak period, where LOS F is defined as the worst freeway operating condition and is defined as a density of more than 45 passenger cars/lane/mile. The results also indicate that there are several physical constraints that generate unacceptable traffic queues. The following list summarizes the deficiencies identified along the SR-91 Corridor: ❖ Heavy traffic volumes from 1-15 (North and South) converge with SR-91. The weaving and merging condition is complicated by the dose proximity of the Westbound (WB) Main Street off -ramp. ❖ High demand from several on -ramps within the eastem segment exacerbates traffic conditions during rush hours. ❖ An eastbound (EB) general purpose (GP) lane is dropped just east of the Corona Expressway (State Route 71). The second EB High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane becomes a GP lane. Heavy downstream congestion forces traffic to exit at the Green River off -ramp. The backup caused by the off -ramp blocks the right lane of the mainline freeway. ❖ High traffic volumes from Gypsum Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road contribute to congestion on the mainline. ❖ The Foothill Transportation Corridor (State Route 241) merges with SR-91 causing additional congestion in the EB direction. Both EB lanes from State Route 241 (SR-241) are dropped prior to State Route 71 (SR-71). ❖ Heavy traffic reentering the freeway merges at slow speeds from existing WB and EB truck scales, impacting the general-purpose lanes. ❖ SR-55 merges with SR-91. An EB lane on SR-91 is dropped at Lakeview Avenue and a second EB lane is dropped at Imperial Highway creating a severe merge condition. WB SR-91 drops a GP lane and a 91 Express Lane to SB SR-55, which contributes to mainline congestion. This drop also occurs on the left-hand side of SR-91 as opposed to the typical right-hand exit. ❖ High demand from Weir Canyon Road, Imperial Highway and Lakeview Avenue. ❖ WB traffic entering SR-91 at Lakeview Avenue weaving through three lanes from WB SR-91 to southbound (SB) SR-55 contributes to mainline congestion. PROJECT SUMMARY Many of the projects identified in this 2010 Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS as well as through subsequent project development. Table 1 summarizes the various projects in the 2010 Plan, and they are outlined below by implementation schedule (see Section 2 for detailed project summaries): ❖ The first set of projects is anticipated to be completed by 2013 and includes two improvements at a total cost of approximately $149 million. The projects include the EB SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71, and new travel lanes between SR-55 and SR-241. These projects are in the process of final 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2 59 • • design, construction, or procurement and implementation, as noted in the project summaries. The 2015 improvements include four projects, with a total cost of approximately $1.95 billion. The projects include interchange improvements at SR-71/SR-91; the Initial SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of the County Line, collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at 1-15/SR-91, extension of 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and system interchange improvements; a new WB lane at Tustin Avenue; and a SR-241/SR-91 HOV/HOT direct connector. Some of these projects may become components of Post-2025/2030 projects. ❖ Four projects for implementation by 2023 include the Metrolink short-term expansion plan, Express Bus improvements, a significant expansion of Metrolink service and station improvements, and SR-91 improvements between SR-57 and SR-55. OCTA, RCTC, and Ca!trans will be initiating preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. Consequently, there may be opportunities to advance these projects If additional funding is made available. Projects for implementation by 2023 would cost approximately $805 million. • Projects for Post-2025/2030 implementation focus on longer -lead time projects and include: a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard; the Ultimate CIP that widens SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to SR-71, I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector; extension of Express Lanes on 1-15 and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15; an elevated 4-lane facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15; Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane facility from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B); and the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport High Speed Rail. The $77 million dollar interchange project and the other four, multi -billion dollar potential projects require a significant amount of planning, Table 1— SR-91 Implementation Plan Projects Project Project Summary (Implementation Year) No. By Year 2013 1 Eastbound Lane Adchtion from SR-241 to SR-71(2010) 2 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5t GP Lane in Each Direction (2013) SUBTOTAL Cost (Sty) 51.2 98.0 149.2 By Year 2015 SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements (2015) 123.5 Initial CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP lane in Each Direction East of County Line, CD Roads and I-15/SR-91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and System Interchange Improvements (2015) 5 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue (2015) 6 SR-2411SR-91 HOVMOT:Connector (2015) SUBTOTAL i dihk SttorT Teim Expansiott.Plart (2d18r press eslmprovements`OrangeCoitP to" „! !nkv�`,oe aq�Statip �1 taetinteea SR 57�anr1` 13 to 1151Dajateo Rc nafierrrr fo Ontario Internaldnal 1,300 91.5 440.0 1955, design, and future policy and public input. In some cases, these projects may include previous projects as project components, such that all projects may not be implemented within this project summay Traffic Analysis For the 2010 Plan, the traffic analysis for major SR-91 capacity projects has been updated from the 2009 Plan. This analysis used the latest freeway operations software model available from UC Berkeley and traffic data calibrated to reflect new traffic patterns since November 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3 60 2009. This freeway operations model provides a better depiction of actual travel delays experienced by motorists compared to traditional travel demand models. The model can be used to analyze freeway bottlenecks sometimes neglected in traditional travel demand models. This approach is especially important given high SR-91 traffic volumes and the potential for relatively few vehicles to significantly slow down traffic. For example, a minor freeway merging area can cause many vehicles to slow, cascading delay through the traffic stream, and suddenly both speed and volume rapidly decrease for major segments of the freeway. The operations analysis quantified travel time savings for WB morning and EB afternoon conditions for the following major capacity enhancing projects: • EB lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71 by 2010 (Project 1). ❖ New WB/EB lanes from SR-55 to SR-241 by 2013 (Project 2). New WB/EB lanes from SR-71 to 1-15 by 2015 (Initial CIP, Project 4). SR-241/SR-91 connector with lanes to SR-71 by 2015 (Project 6). ❖ EB lane between SR-57 and SR-55 by 2023 (Project 10). ❖ New WB/EB lanes, various segments, from SR-241 to 1-15 by Post-2025 (Ultimate CIP, Project 12). ❖ New capacity provided by Corridor A and ICE by Post-2025/2030 (Projects 13 and 14). The results indicate that the WB moming travel times increase for 2013 as there are no planned SR-55/SR-91 interchange bottleneck improvements, but by 2015 the travel time decreases due to the Interim CIP improvements. The 2023 projects do not offer significant capacity improvements; therefore, WB travel times increase. WB and EB results for 2030 illustrate travel time significantly decreases with the Ultimate CIP project. The 2013 afternoon travel times increase for EB SR-91 as no projects in Riverside County are planned for 2013, whereas the 2015 Initial CIP project will significantly decrease EB travel times. EB travel times increase for 2023 as there are only improvements between SR-57 and SR-55 within the SR-91 corridor. The current design of the SR-55/SR-91 interchange limits the ability to move traffic into north and central Orange County via SR-55, and significant future vehicle delays may result without major interchange improvements and downstream capacity increases or diversion to other corridors. The introduction of Corridors A and B by Post-2025/2030 offers the potential capacity to manage future SR-91 traffic demand in both directions. While both of these corridors are still concepts, they provide substantial relief to EB and WB traffic congestion in the future. Further feasibility studies will determine if one or both concepts move forward in the project development process. The charts below describe the travel time benefits by year including these various project concepts. The 2030 scenario shows travel time without the Corridor A and B improvements. Figure 1-1— Mainline Westbound SR-91 from 1-15 to SR-57 A.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time 120 too 80 60 Mainline' Westbound SR-91 From I-15 to SR-57 AM Peak Hour Average Travel Time (in Minutes) 40 — 20 0 Ex stl (2010) 2013 2015 2023 61 Orange County ❑ Riverside County 2030 2030 A&e 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 4 61 • • Figure 1-2 — Mainline Eastbound SR-91 from SR-57 to 1-15 P.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time Mainline. Eastbound SR-91 from SR-57 to 1-15 PM Peak Hour Average Travel Time (itr IVlinutes) t$OrangeCounty Oftiverside County. PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Much progress has been made since the initial 2003 SR-91 Implementation Plan was approved. New for the 2010 Plan is the inclusion of select completed project exhibits as a reference, see Section 3. Recently Completed Construction/Improvement Projects As of May 2010, the following physical improvements have been constructed/implemented: ❖ Repaved and sealed pavement surfaces, replaced raised channelizers, and restriped lanes on the 91 Express Lanes. • EB SR-91 restripe and median barrier reconstruction project that removed the CHP enforcement area and extended the EB auxiliary lane from SR-71 to the Serfas Club Drive off -ramp. •: Express Bus improvements are implemented for the Galleria at Tyler to South Coast Metro route. ❖ WB auxiliary lane extension between the County Line and SR-241. This project eliminated the lane drop at the 91 Express Lanes and extended the existing auxiliary lane from the County Line to SR-241 in the westbound direction. This improvement minimized the traffic delays at the lane drop area, resulting in improved vehicle progression. • WB restripe project extended the auxiliary lane between SR-71 and the County Line resulting in a new continuous auxiliary lane between SR-71 & SR-241. ❖ Safety Improvements at the Truck Scales. Existing shoulders were improved, lanes were re -striped, illumination improved, and signage was modified into and out of the EB facilities. ❖ Green River Road overcrossing replacement (See Section 3). ❖ Metrolink parking structure at the North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station (See Section 3). These projects provide enhanced freeway capacity and improved mobility for one of the most congested segments of the freeway. In addition, there are two projects that are currently in the project development phase that have a direct impact upon SR-91 widening projects. The first is the $2 billion U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Santa Ana River Mainstem (SARM) improvement project that provides flood protection from the recently improved Prado Dam (near SR-71) to the Pacific Ocean. As part of the Corps' project, existing riverbanks have been improved due to the increased capacity of the Prado Dam outlet works, which can now release up to 30,000 cfs compared to the previous facility capacity of 10,000 cfs. The only remaining segment of the Santa Aria River to -be improved is Reach 9, which includes areas along SR-91 from the Coal Canyon Wildlife Corridor Crossing to SR-71. SR-91 project design teams have coordinated with the Corps; Caltrans; and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate future SR-91 improvements by the Corps bank protection project within Reach 9 by relocating the Santa Ana River while it would have been otherwise disturbed by the original Corps project to protect -in -place the riverbank protection for SR-91. This will greatly 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 5 62 enhance the ability of Caftans and other regional transportation agencies to implement many of the SR-91 improvement projects listed herein. The Corps SARM Reach 9 improvements are under construction with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) "stimulus" funding. The other project with a direct impact to SR-91 is the $100 million Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer trunk line relocation. The existing SARI line is within the Santa Ana River floodplain and is in jeopardy of failure due to scour from the potential increased flood releases by the aforementioned Corps project. In order to relocate the proposed 48-inch diameter SARI line outside of the floodplain, which is immediately adjacent to SR-91, highway RAW needs to be relinquished to the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) for location of the SARI line. SR-91 project teams have coordinated with the OCFCD; Caltrans; and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate planned SR-91 improvements within the remaining State RNV subsequent to relinquishment. This project initiated the preliminary engineering phase in early 2009 and is scheduled to complete construction by summer 2012. Recently Completed PSR's and other Reports In addition to the physical improvements in the corridor, there are several reports and PSR's that are completed, in draft form, or anticipated to be approved that identify improvements that will provide improved mobility. The reports and PSR's include (also see Section 4): ❖ Project Study Report "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County" (April 2004). ❖ MIS — Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report (January 2006). ❖ Project Study Report "On Route 91 from State Route 241 in Orange County to Pierce Street in the City of Riverside in Riverside County" (October 2006). Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan (November 2006). ❖ Project Study Report for SR-71/SR-91 Interchange (December 2006). ❖ RCTC 10-Year Westem County Highway Delivery Plan (December 2006). • ••• Renewed Measure M Early Action Plan, approved August 2007. 91 Express Lanes Extension and State Route 241 Connector Feasibility Study (March 2009). Project Study Report "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County" (April 2009). ❖ Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for Eastbound SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71 (May 2009). ❖ Renewed Measure M Strategic Plan (June 2009). ❖ SR-91 Feasibility Study from SR-57 to SR-55 (December 2009). ❖ SR-91/Fairmont Boulevard Feasibility Study (December 2009). Updates from the 2009 SR•91 Implementation Plan In addition, to the improvements and progress noted above, the following projects that were included in the 2009 SR-91 Implementation Plan have been modified or dropped for the 2010 Plan: ❖ A new Section 3 has been added to the 2010 Plan that includes exhibits of completed projects from prior plans as a reference. ❖ The North Main Street Corona Metrolink parking structure improvements have been completed and the project is moved to Section 3 of the Plan. ❖ The SR-55/SR-91 interchange improvements project has been deleted as a standalone for 2010 and is consolidated with Project 10 from SR-57 to SR-55. 4• The CIP project is split into two phases: Initial (Project 4) and Ultimate (Project 12). • The 2011 horizon year has been updated to 2013 to capture projects to be implemented before 2015. ❖ The 2022 horizon year has been updated to 2023 to capture projects to be implemented before 2025. • Various project costs and schedules have been updated from the 2009 Plan based on continued project development. 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 6 63 • SECTION 2: OVERVIEW The 2010 Plan describes projects, implementation schedules, key consideration, benefits, and costs (in 2009 dollars, or as noted) for major projects through Post- 2025/2030. Most of the projects identified in this Implementation Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS. The schedules for implementation of the packages of projects include 2013, 2015, 2023, and Post-2025/2030. The 2013 and 2015 projects are capable of being implemented through the project development process with minimal to moderate environmental constraints. Some of the longer -range projects for 2023 and Post-2025/2030 require more significant planning and environmental assessment prior to design. Each of the project improvements includes an estimate of project schedules. It is important to note that implementing various time saving measures, such as design -build or contractor incentives for early completion, may potentially reduce project schedules. The implementation phases are defined as follows: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN •3 Conceptual Engineering = Pre -Project Study Report (Pre-PSR) — Conceptual planning . and engineering for project scoping and feasibility prior to initiating the PSR phase. + Preliminary Engineering = Project Study Report (PSR) — Conceptual planning and engineering phase that allows for programming of funds. ❖ Environmental = Project ReportlEnvironmental Documentation (PRIED) — The detailed concept design that provides environmental clearance for the project and programs for final design and right of way acquisition. The duration for this phase is typically 2-3 years. ❖ Design = Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) — Provide detailed design to contractors for construction bidding and implementation. ❖ Construction = The project has completed construction and will provide congestion relief to motorists. The intent of these implementation plan project packages is to provide an action list for OCTA, RCTC and Ca!trans to pursue in the project development process or for initiating further studies. Figure 2-1— SR-91 Project Study Area from SR-57 to 1-15 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 7 64 BY YEAR 201 3 The first set of projects will be completed by 2013 and includes two improvements at a total cost of approximately $149 million (in 2009 dollars). The projects include the EB SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71, and new travel lanes between SR- 55 and SR-241. These projects are in the process of final design, construction, or procurement and implementation. These projects are recommended for the first few years of the Plan and will provide mobility improvements to the corridor when implemented. These near term projects provide immediate operational benefits with a minimum of effort required relative to environmental documentation and Right -of -Way constraints. Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) 1 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71(2010) 51.2 2 Widen SR-91 between SR55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5th GP Lane in Each Direction (2013) 98.0 SUBTOTAL 149.2 Figure 2-2 — Summary of Projects for Implementation By 2013 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8 • 65 Eastbotmd Lane Addition from 5R-241 to SR-71 Project NC: Antielpated CoMpletfter2010 PiOjec(CestEstitinte Capital Cost Support Cost RAN Cost Total Project Gast Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Envimnmental Design Construction $ 41,000,000 8,000,1X10 S 2,20tt,000 $ S1,200,000 Completed Completed Completed 2009420'10 *Costs from final design estimates (2009 dollars) 4 LEGEND Existing Keyway 11=1 Interchange/Ramp rwm. County Line FiOY es HOT Lane :I Baking Lane MEM ProJect Inghvement Lam ot-Evs' 6ng intenhange Gypsum CanyR on oir I- - I"- •".. 4- I i_...T__ ......___ _ _ 1 1 On Off--------43) Project Desertptiori The project will provide an additional eastbound (EB) lane from the -SR-91/S11241 interchange to the SR771/SR-91 interchange and will Widen all EB lanes andaboulders tostandard widths. Key Corislderations Coonlination with the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Projects (Pmject 44 and #12) will be required_ Staged construction would he required for all ramp reconstruction and freeway widening_ Freeway operations -would most likely be affected by this project, however, freeway lane ctosures are not anticipated. An EB concrete shoulder will be constructed with a 12 foot width to provide for future widening as contemplated by Project #f4 and #12. Benefits The lane addition would help to alleviate the weaving condition between SR-241 and SR-71, as well as remove vehicles from the SR-01 mainline that would be exiting at Green River Road and SR-71. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in December 2007, Funding is from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) with $71.4414 approved, and the balance of pmject costs are from other sources. Construction began HI late 2009 and is scheduled to be completed by Fall 2010. Coal Canyon littiC County Line AZigt.**410,!AWNI*29.,' Green River Rd On Off On Off On Off On 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9 66 Widen SR-91 bebAreen SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5th GP 1Lane in Each Direction Project No: 2 Arittditated Comigettorti 201a Project Cost Estimate* Capital Cost $70,000,000 'Support Cost $-24,500,000 RAN Cost $ 3 500 000 Total Project Cost $ 98 000 000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engirieering ComPleted Environmental Completed Design 2000-2010 - COnstnictim 2011-2013 *Costs from Caltmns Project 'Report (2099 doltars) LEGEND Biding -Highway Imo ramp Euating Interchange s Pmposed hitcrthange HOV or NOT Lane BONEN Lane Inn•PrnEct Improvement Lane ;t AuxtUary Lane 2- Lakeview Av On Oif Off Project Description This projectproposes capacity pail operational improvements W.:adding .onegeneral purpose (GPilaile on eaStbOundiER),S11-01..frOirrtha SR-55rSR-41 cc ime*r to east of WeirGanyon Road ititertbarige - and on westbound (Vi(B) SR-91.from just:bast:Of Woir Canyon:ROM inferf,i‘lnge,40 the Imperial Higlwray (Sli-99).interChatige'. tlidtiltiOnak this project would facilitaM truCkiraffit approaching the ' Arlie§ in -both directions Key Considerations Caltraris is not considering relocation ate truck scales of tinie. Benefits Alleviates congestion on WB SR-91 by eliminating thAlane...drop at the truck scales and providing a continuous GP lane to SR-9E Alteviates congestion on ER SR-91 by efirrtinaOtig* the lane drop fcirriorlittitind (NB) S14-55 at SIR-91 by providing an auxiliary lane to Lalrevimit Avenue, and at SR-90 by providing a continuous GP lane "through Wriir Canyon Road. Current Status Preliminary, engreenng was coMpletoct MM,9,a0proVed by:Dattrar*I The, , 'enVironrnorital phase was completed April, 409_, Dastgit is,45tredittatito beCompleted Septeinher.2818. ConSini*MISAcheiltried1O'begini4tirie 2011. The project; 0:3/1 of. tar.00 Mobility- Inipetiveinent Accourit1CMIA) fundtrig -and- $7, '4h1 of State-Ti.unsPurlatiOrilliPrOVeilleht "Prograni(STIP)Augmentation funds. iURi Fairmont BI Truck Scales Weir Canyon Canyon Rd Out on Off - On Off • Off NOTE: FAIRMONT BLVD IS CONTINGENT UPON IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT #11 • • • 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 10 6 7 • BY YEAR 20 1 5 The next set of improvements includes four projects, which would be implemented by 2015 at a total cost of approximately $1.95 billion (in 2009 dollars, or as noted). One of the projects is the interchange improvements at SR-71/SR-91. The second project is the Initial SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) that will widen SR-91 by one general purpose (GP) lane in each direction east of the County Line, collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at I-15/SR-91, extension of 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and system interchange improvements. The other two projects that will be completed in this time frame include the WB lane at Tustin Avenue, and a SR-241/SR-91 HOV/HOT direct connector. Project No. 3 Project Summary (Implementation Year) SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements (2015) Cost ($M) 123.5 4 Initial CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction East of County Line, CD Roads and I-15/SR-91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15, and System Interchange Improvements (2015) 1,300 5 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue (2015) 91.5 6 SR-241/SR-91 HOWHOT Connector (2015) 440.0 SUBTOTAL 1,955 Figure 2-3 - Summary of Projects for Implementation By 2015 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 11 68 SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements Project No: 3 Anticipated Completion: 2015 Project Cost Estimate' Total. Project Cost $ 123,500,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Completed 20082010 20-11-2015 ' Costs derived from RCTC 10-Year Delivery Plan escalated to year of construction (2007;dollar5) LEGEND ammo, EAsing Nighway .verz IGMBIIOV 'aktirxj'*n., roses PmiecttmoroXemer+tlane: mE MOT Laaes %tension tfttft &.6 Road 14tg Piidr�ry. lane:. _Pro*Ptfl OtTroi'en1! s. r Project Description The current project is an On -Ramp. Key Considerations ated to include a new two-lane direct connector flyover from eastbound (EB) SR-91 to northbound (NB) SR-71, and modifications to the existing Green River Road EB SR-91 Project improvements need to be coordinated With the following projects: SR-91 Eastbound (EB) Lane Addition (Project#1), the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Projects (CIP) (Project #4 and #12), and. the. SR 241/S.R-91 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)/High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Direct Connector (Project #6)_ The Green River Road Overcitrssing Replacement was recently completed and consists of replacing the existing Green River Road: Overcrossing with. a rimy six -lane wide, 4-span overcrossing to accommodate future widening of SR-91 by Projects #1, #4, #6, and #12. The SR-91 EB Lane Addition .(Project #1) is currently under construction_ The SR-91 CIP (Project #4 and #12) is in the environmental phase, concurrent with this project A feasibility studyfor the SR-241/SR-91 HOWHOT Connector (Project #6) was completed in March 2009, which includes three alternatives for further study. Close coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S_ Fish and Wildlife Service, and Department of Fish and Game wilt also be required as the connector crosses the Santa Ana River below the Prad© Dam. in addition, implementation of Major Investment Study (MIS) Cionidor A (Prgect#13) within the median of SR-91 will require the need for a three -level crossing of SR-91 and the proposed SR-71 direct flyover connector. Coordination will be required with an at -grade or grade -separated managed lane ingress/egress facility that may be near the County Boundary as part of the SR-91 CIP (Project #4 and #12), Benefits -The project Wilt provide.a new direct connector improvement from EB SR-91 to NB SR-71, replacing lice geometric choice point .created tiq the existing connector The. project will also improve traffic operations and operational efficiency by eliminating.or minimizing weaving conflicts through the use of auxiliary lanes The EB CD road system will reduce mainline SR-91 traffic by diverting traffic bound for SR=71_ Current Statics Preliminary engineering was.completed and:approved by Caltrans. This project is currently in the environmental phase, which commenced in February 2008 and is anticipated to be completed' by the'end of 2010. Gypsum Rd�ff W,LC ' �on Of Coal ,Can yon County Line - *o" Lanes shown are for EB Lane Addition (Project #1) Green Rivet Rd. Lanes shown are for the SR-71/SR-9.1 interchange east to north flyover connector for SR 71, and connector from Green River Road to EB:SR-91 AM°tenter Dr MapieSi On Off' On _ Off Off On Off Serfas Club Dr Laneshown is for Green River Rd Ep SR-91 On -Ramp 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 69 12 Initial CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction East of County Line, CD Roads and I-151SR-91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and System Interchange Improvements t Project No: 4 Anticipated Completion: 2015 Project Cost Estimate* Capital Cost $ 1,063,000,000 Support Cost $ 237,000,000 Total Project Cost $ 1:300,000,000 Project Schedule** Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmental 2007-2011 Design/Construction 2011-2015 *Cost for Initial Project is from RCTC and is in 2009 dollars "Schedule for initial. Project; subsequent phases: for Ultimate.. Project anticipated Post 2025 unless funding is identified Lane shown is for Proj #2. ohm Gypsum CCanyo d on On Off /j Ofi On ! On Lane shown is for Proj #2 Project Description The approved Project Study Report (PSR) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, recommended the addition of a 5th lane in each direction; the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, and the addition of collector -distributor (CD) lanes at the SR 71/SR=91 interchange (now part of Project #3) and at the 1-15/SR-91 interchange: Subsequently, the Riverside County Transportation Commission's (RCTC) 10-Year Delivery Plan recommended the following in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the, extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the. construction of SR-91 (EBNVB)l1-15 (SI3/NB) Express Lanes median direct. connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the I-15/SR-91 interchange southerly to I-151Cajalco Road, and northerly to -15/Hidden Valley Parkway (Ultimate Project #12), Due to current economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an (Mita! Project with reduced improvements to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed between 2015 and.2035. The following is a summary of the deferred ultimate improvements (Project #12): SR-91/I-15 median North Direct Connector and 1-15 Express Lanes: North to Hidden Valley; Parkway,' 1-15 Express Lanes to beextended from Ontario. Avenue to Cajalco Road,' genera/ purpose lanes from I-15 to Pierce Street; and genemlpurpose lanes from SR-241 to SR-71. Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope Between projects 'requires direct coordination between each project team Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically; the project: improvements need to continue to be: coordinated with the SR-91 Eastbound (EB) Lane Addition (Project #1); the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (Project #3); and the SR-241/SR-01 HOV/HOT Connector (Project #6),:which includes three alternatives for further study that will need to be coordinated with the proposed project Continued coordination will ha required with the Santa Ana. Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer line relocation: and the U.S_ Anny .Corps of Engineers Santa Ana River bank -protection project (Reach 9 Phase 2B). Benefits The Initial and Ultimate. CIP projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR791 capacity from SRr241 to Pierce Street, along 145 from SR-91 to. Cathie° Road to:the south; and to HiddenValley Parkway tb the north. Traffic operation will ttifprove .by' eliminating or redueih j weaving c'ollflicts along SR-91 and I-1,5 by the tree gf CD toads end auXiliary lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for -time savings: Current Status. AProject Study Report was completed and approved by Caltrans. The Coal Canyon County Line Green River Rd On Off Lane shown is for EB' Lane Addition (Prot #1) Ingress/Egress lanes drown within the Express Lanes off on OffSeries Club Dr Lanes shown are for the-SR-71/SR-91 Interchange (Proj #3) auxiliary lane, Past to north flyoverconnector for SR-71/SR-91 PSR Alternative 2, and EB SR-91 connector from Green River Road reject is currently: inthe environmental phase'that cojnlnenced. in September 2007and "is anticipated to be completed by late-2011_ Autd Center Dr Maple St On iM on On On Off OR On Linco Off Alm On On Main S, On Ott OR O 3-Lane CD Road Connector from Main St. EB on -ramp braids to join SR-91 as a merge ramp On iron On From From BB 15 Na is HOWHOT lanes to 1-15/Ontario Av LEGEND a Existing Highway tee=te Interchange/Ramp County Line HOV or HOT Lane KIM Existing Lana ■111w Project Improvement Lane lir HOT Lanes Extension 111111 CD Road li Auxiliary Lane —._sil_ Project#t, #2, and #3 Braided Connector Additional lane by restripe of existing lanes 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 70 13 • SR 9I BNB Lane at Tustin Avenue Project No.: Anticipated Completion: 2015 Project Cost Estimate` Capital Cost $ 65300,000 Support Cost $ 22 900,000 RNV Cost $ 3300,000' Total. Project Cast- $ 91,500,000 Project' Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed. 2008-2011 2(f 11-2013 2013-20'15 Costs and schedule' are derived from 20009 STIP information LEGEND, woo Interihange/Ramp. Naas Existing Jntentihange HOV Or HOT Lane r_7:2:1 Existing Lane alle Project buprwmanentLane - n t Existing Lanes (Mine i - Pngect 02 Improvements Of 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Project Description The project will add a:'westbound (W13) auxiliary lane on SR-91 beginning et the northbound (NB) SR-55 to WB 'SR-91 connector through ttie Tustin Avenue interchange_ key Considerations The three build -alternatives within the Prrcijject Study Report (PSR), On Westbound (WB) SR-91' Auxiliary Lane from the 1 torthbound (NB) SR-55!WB SR-01 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange, require additional right-of-way. City of Anaheim utilities are within close proximity of the proposed widening section_ Widening of the Santa Ana Rivet bridge is required for all alternatives.. Coordination with the City of Anaheirri will be required for potential widening of Tiastnt Avenue and the WB SR-91 Off -Ramp that will be completed by early 2011_ A SR-91 Feasibility Study from SI257 to SR 55 was completed in December 2009, which evaluated improvements from Lakeview Avenue through TustinAve iue:. Benefits The, project would reduce or eliminate operational problems and deficiencies on this section of WB SR-91 including weaving and merging maneuvers. This project would also address choke -point conditions, which are caused primarily by extensive weaving between the NB SR-.55to WS SR-91 connector and the WS SR 91 off -tamp to TustinAvenue. Current Status Preliminary engineering was completed and approved by Caftans_ The environmental phase was initiated in mid-2008 and is scheduled for completion in early 2011, and design is scheduled to begin in August 2011 The project received $91.431v1 in 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program (ST P)Augmentationfunding. Lakeview Av C)n t 14 71 S€-24ISW91 H )Vi'H@T .Citi►nne+e�t�►r E'Not- Anticipated Completion:20'15 rojec2;Coat Estimate Range' Total.Proj Cost; LOW $150000;000 R Teta Pref.. Cbst ' Htigh $ 440,090,000 Project Schedote Conceptual Engineering Completed Erwrronmental 2010=2012 Design 2012-2013 Cnnstnittirin 2013-2015 "Range assumes,a 2-lane r or 4-lane connector, extending as far as SR-71 Costs from Feasibility Study (2009 dollars) LEGEND - Exishng Highway InterrhangelRamp - County Line ▪ ttOV or HOT Lane RA�a Existing Lane u m Project improvement Lane -mmo Express Lanes Extension r ; Pitied #1, #2, #3, aril #4 Improvements —:Fxiatirg intercharu3e Proj eet nrstriiption rne: SR 2a1isR=91 High cupancy vehide., (How) f High Occupancy Toll (HOT) connector Ail carry northbound 0SR-241 traffic to eastbound (Es) SR-91 Engels Lanes and tanywestbround'(VVB).91 Express Lams iralfie to sot#htxund (SB) SR-241. Outside" widening would be regrued mainly on the south side of SR-91 for neatignrtterit Of EB ianea Key' Considerations. Costs maY vary significantly deperctng ar the.;knaementati©n of ei[tirprojeds- The HOWHOT ciintnedor merges in the inediartof SR-91 and regisres.outsrde widehing of: �SR-91 and realigienent of the r ypsu it Carryon Mtereharrge. ImPlerrieMition rivlajor Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A (Proiett #10) may supercede'tile -need kiF tie HOWHOT co nredorimpfwements as the projectmay become the west leg of Corridor A; itie connector impact'on.SR-91 depends upon lithe connector is 4-la hes or24aries_. The:iitpad of the.cmnnedorOh the.91 Express Lanes may remise the ednnettOt ar, to be extended, possibly to SR 71, which war require further evatuatiom Toll cottectton issues would need to be resolved. Widening to :accommodate lbe project Could fact titre cnaecior-clistitumr •(CD) roa1 and retaining -was near the County Line, and is • taer omadated:by the SR-71' connector (Project:#3)as'Saes try tare lanes added with Project #4 and #k12, including the potentiar t=adensi on cif 91 Exceess Lames as cunenily proposed in Riverside Comity Transportation COmmiission's (RCTC) 10Near-Delivery Platt Costs range from a;2-Fare connector..enang near Coal Canyonid a 4-lane connector ending near SR-71: Also, the -project -could be considered as a component. of Project #4 or #12 Realignment 'of,HVB arid EB SR-91 lanes may be required. In addition, an at -grade or;gradr:-separated managed late ingressiecjess facility Maysbe introduced near the County Line'bjr Pruett #4 or #12 Nonstandard lane wibths may be required at the Green River.Rried overcroSa ng: Benefits Improves access to SR-241 and South Gnu* for traffic thatdoes not currently utilize 91'Express Lanes, which also improves WB SR-91 by eliminating the need for HOY users to wive et oss' four general purpose Ides to use the existing SR 241 connector. Alleviates congestion on NB SR241 and EB SR-91 by allowing SR241 toll andfor.HOY users to bypass the existhij EB 'SR-91 general purpose connector. The project may provide a benefit to the Central Courtly NUS_. 'Current Status `Preliminary engineering concepts for a SR-241/SR-91 direct connector have been developed by Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) and Cations. The 91 Express Lanes Extension and SR-241 Connector Feasibility Study was completed in tpl"arch 2009 and was initiated le evaluate the various alternatives. A PSR may be initiated in 2010. project Coal Cariypn County Line n Ri d Lane MP) on On Project #1, #2, #3, and #4 improvements. Potentially impacted by Project#6 WLC - 6�+ r i r_ 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 15 72 • BY YEAR 2023 Projects for implementation by 2023 include the Metrolink short-term expansion plan, Express Bus improvements from Orange County to Riverside County, a significant expansion of Metrolink service and station improvements, and SR-91 improvements between SR-57 and SR-55. OCTA, RCTC, and Ca!trans will be initiating preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. Consequently, there may be opportunities to advance these projects if additional funding is made available. Projects for implementation by 2023 are expected to cost approximately $805 million (in 2009 dollars, or as noted). Some of these projects may become components of post-2025/2030 projects. Project No. 7 Project Summary (Implementation Year) Metrolink Short -Term Expansion Plan (2016) Cost ($M) 35.4 8 Express Bus Improvements Orange County to Riverside County (2016) 9.5 9 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements (2020) 335 10 SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 (2023) 425 SUBTOTAL 804.9 Figure 2-4 — Summary of Projects for Implementation By 2023 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 16 73 e#rolink Sh in -Teri» Expalnsi+ 'laa Project Description. Orarige County Transportation Authority (OCTA): yuorfting'wl(i. the Riverside Gouniy Transportation Commission" (ROTC); SanDemardino € Associated, Governitents (SANBAU), and ,the Soirthem-C,aiiTwrni € Regional Rai. Authority (SCRRA. ),,. plans a shprt4erm expansion , 'train service from the Inland. Empire to Orange County-tifiorqitaiiis are planned on the Inland Empire = Orange, County (1E0C) fine that E currently runs between San Bemarditro, Riverside; and rage. counties as Welt -as the "91 Line" that goes from the Inland Empire to '. Los Angeles via Orange County, paralleling SR-91.. Project.Gost Estimate* OCTA Project Cost Project Schedule To be completed by 2016 'Costs from OCTA:(2009 dollars) 000 Currently, 14:trains a day run on the IEOC-tine and nine trams on the 91 Line for a total of 23 daily trains_ The short-term expansion adds four additional 1E0C trains and four additional 91 t..inetrains by`2616 for a total of 31 daily trains, subject to negotiations with Burlington r Northern Santa Fe (I3NSF.), ROTC, .and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LlACMTA), The planned short-term expansion is necessary to accommodate: poprilation and employment.growth in the legion as well as make the current snrvrce More convenient. ' Key Considerations Capital costs necessary for this expansion includes the purchase of engines and coaches to operate the new service_ OCTA costs are estimated at $35_4 mtlf"ran: The long-term plan (by 2020) adds more service and requires a significant capital investment, including an additional station in Placentia Coordination has been ongoing with the Metrofink. extension studies (see also Project f#9 forleng-term details): Benefits • Enables develri ent of expanded Meirolink Service and improves efficiency, which wiU contribute to congestion relief onSRt 91, Current Status SCRRA equipment procurement is underway with Rotem Company for the purchase of trailer and cab cars,.alai also witti MotivePower, Inc_ for locomotives Anticipated completion is 2013/2016. ,aa DAILY TRAINS Year 2010: 14 Year2016: 22 - q co p ight2t:t E C""3'. E JS': DAILY TRAINS Year 2010 23 Year2016.' 31 rod aed ^'ith ✓ New train engines and coaches ✓ $35.4 million 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 17 74 Express Bits lmprov Orange County to Riverside Gaunt Project No: Anticipated. Completion: 2016 Project Cost Estimate* Total Capital. Cast $ 9,500,000 Total Annual Operat g Cost $ 900,000 Project Schedule Riverside/Corona to South Coast Metro implemented Fall 2006 Riverside/Corona to Tyler M Irvine Business Camplex/UCl in FY2015/2016 Riverside/Corona 'toNorth East Anaheim and CSUFin FY 20/5/2016 Riverside/Corona to Anaheim Resort in F1'2015/2016 Costs -from OCTA (2009 dollars) 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Project Description range County TranspQ iatran Authority (OCTA), working with the Riverside County Transportation Coirimission (ROTC), and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA),, plans an ,extensive exparrsiorr : of Express Bus service between Riversideand Orange counties:_ Commuters .seek direct transit connections to many Orange County employment centers, and new Express. Bus service will provide connections to employment centers in Anaheim, Costa . Mesa, Fullerton, and Irvine_ FOUF.Express ,Bus routes, are planned from Riverside County to the Anaheim Canyon Business Center and California State University Fullerton; Anaheim Civic Center; Western Medical Center, and Anaheim Resort; and Irvine Business Complex and University of Cardotnia, Irvine {UCI). Routes would nar:every 30-to 45 minutes in the peak period, and service will be tailored to match :demand_ Implementation began in Fall 2006 vvith the Riverside County to Hutton Centre and South Coast Metro route The other routes are planned for implementation by Fiscal Year 2015/2016 contingent on future budget authority_ Key Considerations Operating costs are estimated at S900,000 each year, Costs are shared by Orange and Riverside counties_ Benefits Development of Express Bus services will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91, Current Status A cooperative agreement covering the Riverside/Corona to South Coast Metro service with Riverside County has been developed_ The Riverside County to South Coast Metro Express Bus route is currently operating. Expansion of the program is dependent_ upon future financial committments with Riverside County_ 18 75 Project No: 9 Anticipated Completion: 2020 "ProjeCt`Ctist Eitirriate* Intel Capital Cost $‘335 000 000 Project Schedule To be completed by 2020 'tests from OCTA (2009 dodars) Metrolink Service and Station Improvements, Project Description = Orange county Traisportation Authority (OCTA), working with the Ftiverade County Transportation Commission (ROTC), Sari Bernardino Astecialed -Governments (SAM3AG), and the Southern CaBernie Regional. Rai Authority . (SCRRA), Plans an extensive expansion of tan service frorathe Wand Entiite to " Orange County. More trains are planned on the Wand Empire - °raw Ceti* (1E0C) line that carently mars between San Bernardino, .Riverside, and Orange ciiixrtie'aas Well as Me *91 tine" that goes frum the Inland Empire to Los Aogeles „ via Marge Courtly, paralleltg SR-91. Currently, 14 trains a clay run on, the 1E0C fine and Mire trains on the 91 l_ine_ The long-term expansion plan buikis on'service levels that will be impleinerded by 2016 "(Project #7). The "2016" Plan includes four additional 1E0C pains arid four addifional 91 tine trains for a kite!, of 31 trains a day. The long-terrn plan adds another four 1E0C trains and five 91 line try for a total of 40 ris ly balm This plarmed evansion is neomsary to accommodate population and employment growth in the region as well as make the curreMservice mole convenient Capital improvemerts necessary for ttris expansion include a third -track on sections of the rail line in Orange, Rivaside, and San Bernardino:counties; new crossovers at critical locations to allow trains to pass one another, new storage tracks in San Bernadine; parking improvements at key stations; and purchase °famines and coacttes to operate the newservice. TheCity of Anaheim is proposing to cianstruct the Anaheim Regional Transpretabon Irttermodal Ceder (ART1C). Phase 1 will be, -completed by 2015 and will relocate the existing Metrolink station from the Angel Stadium parldrig tot to the neiv ARTIG site_ east of SR-57, includes a new Metrofink and Amtrak service ferny, and infrastructure improvements for Calffromia High -Speed Rail (CHSR) and bus services_ Phase II build -out is anticipated by 2020 and includes new services based upon increased demand as well as Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and a local fored-guideway pmject The Phase ill ultirnede build -out by 2030 includes additional terminal facilities Mitt new regional services to include CHSR and the Anaheim to Oita*, segment of the Califomia-Nevada &per Speed Train (CNSSTY The City is also proposing Anaheim Canyon Station improvements for a second trackand platform to be implemented by 201312014. The City of Placentia is pmposirtg to constructa new Metrolirik mini -ratter rad passenger station and parking tot in the City of Placentia. This project is scheduled to be completed by 2020. Key Considerations The capital program is estimated to cost $33,5 illation, and costs would be; shared by the trimmer agencies of SCRFtA and Borlingbon Northern Santa Fe (ErNSF). Service levels are subject to negotiation with EINSP, ROTC, and ina Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Benefits Enables development of nevi Metnolink Services, which will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status The proposed arplementation of this ptujeLl is being evauated based on declining ridership and revenues. .+++++,+++..' , -e- 6141-Fdek3 wd ++.! = ANCE , :sat ti,...,i4trop co DAILY TRAINS Year 2016- 31 Year 2030 40 0-4.101-1L_L+3 - CORA:444 v New track and crossovers Expanded station parking v New train engines and coaches ✓ $335 million /rGrarric,e Fro -,..3iproiluc-adr6th DAILY TRAINS Year 2010: 14 Year 2030: 26 _ 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 19 • • 76 SR-9 1 between .SR-57 nd SR 55 Project No: Anticipated Cornptetfont 2023: Project Cost Estfnhate Cwitat Cost TBD RAN Cost TBD Support Cost TBD. Malaga/tent 8 Contingency Teo Total Project Cast' $425.000,000 Project Schedule: Conceptual Erring; Corrrpleted PrelirnirraryEnjineerirg 20104,011 Environmental 2011-2016: Design 2016-2013 Construcli 2019-2023 'Project cost from the 9R 91 from SR-,55 to SR-57 Feasibility Study /2009 dollars) Project Description,. 'Improve the SR-57/SR-91 uderctrange complex, including nearby local ',interchanges, as weft as adding freeway capacity 'between- SR-55 and. $12-57. A riew -connector from r�r Sibourut'(WBySR-91 to southboundISB) SR will be constructed.'Improvements :also exteivt+i State Coliege BNd: Ito the west and include improvements- to: the Lakeview Ave Interchange to Ithe east, i. Specific improvements Mil be subject to approved plans developed in cooperation with local jurisdictions and affected communities. Ittey Considerations ITtre proposed project improvements on Vi/B and eastbound (EB) SR=91 "between S12-57 and SR 55 may require right-of-way acquisition_ Coordination with the SR-91 'WB Lane at Tustin Avenue improvements {Protect #53 will be required: Benefits The proposed project improvements on W!!B and EB SR 91 between SR-57 and SR-55 includes, among other features;: adding one EB general purposeWoe to achieve lane balancing. The project improvement, will alteviate congestion and reduce delay_ The SR-57/SR-91 and SR-55/SR-91 interchange rmpnavements are expected to'prov'rde congeslion relief for SR-91 traffic . Current Status The projectimprovement for EB SR-91 widening and for improvements to. SR-57/SR-91 and SR-55/SR 91 were studied by the-SR-91 Feasibility Study Reportfrom SR-57 to SR-55, which was completed in December 2009. The proposed improvements are included in the Renewed Measure; M program, 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 20 77 BY YEAR POST-2025/2030 Projects for implementation by Post-2025/2030 focus on longer -lead time projects. This multi -billion dollar program includes: a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard; the Ultimate CIP that widens SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to SR-71, I-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector, extension of Express Lanes on 1-15 and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15; an elevated 4-lane facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to I-15; Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane facility from SR-241/SR-133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B); and the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport High Speed Rail. The $77 million dollar interchange project and the other four, multi -billion dollar potential projects include significant environmental constraints and right of way requirements in addition to requiring a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. The Corridor A project may incorporate projects being developed in the earlier programs as project components, such that all projects may not be implemented within the Plan in addition to Corridor A. Project No. 11 Project Summary (Implementation Year) Fairmont Boulevard Improvements (Post-2025) Cost (5M) 76,8 12 Ultimate CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction from SR-241 to SR-71, 1-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector, Extension of Express Lanes on 1-15 and SR-91 Improvements East of 1-15 (Post-2025) TBD 13 Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 (TBD) 2,720 14 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from SR-241/SR-133 to 1-15/Cajalco Road (TBD) 8,855 15 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport High Speed Rail (Past-2030) TBD SUBTOTAL 11,652+ Figure 2-5 — Summary of Projects for Implementation by Post-2025/2030 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 21 • • 78 and 1 p►rovemen s; Project No: 11 Anticipated Completion: Post-2025 Project Cost Estimate Capita Cost $ -67,800,000 Support Cost $ 9,000,000 Total Project Cost $ 76,800, 00 Project Schedule I Conceptual Engineering Completed j Preliminary Engineering TBD Environmental Design Construction TBD TBD TBD 'Costs from Feasibility Study (2009 dollars)_ RNV cost is undetermined at this time_ Cost does trotinclude potential impact to Santa Ana Rives_ LEGEND MEM Existing Hi aY 'Nese Proposed. lnierchsngeh?amp Exestig Interchange rs-iM HDV of HOT Lane Ma Existing Lane NM Proposed Impewement Lane =: Pm*ct 42 Improvements Project #t2 Lanes - project Description The project would provide a new interchange with SR-91 at Fairmont Boulevard. On- and off -:ramps will connect Fairmont Boulevard to eastbound (EB) and westbound (VVB) SR-91_ Theproposed interchange does not include a Fairmont Boulevard connection to Santa Ana Canyon Road to the south_ Key Considerations Coordination with SR-91 EB and WB widening from SR-55 to SR-241 (Project;#2) is required_ Interchange spacing and weaving issues (to SR-55) need to be evaluated. Widening of SR-91 may be needed to accommodate interchange ramps Proximity of the Santa Ana River may require that the WB ramp junction be located north of the river. New connection requirements and interchange spacing needs to be considered. Benefits The interchange is expected to relieve congestion at Imperil Highway (SR-90), Lakeview Avenue, and Weir Canyon Road Interchanges. Preliminary traffic modeling shows a 10-15% decrease in volumes at Weir Canyon and SR-90 interchanges with the interchange alternative. Current Status The City of Anaheim completed a conceptual engineering study in December 2009_ Multiple alternatives have been developed as part of the conceptual engineering study_ Project development is pending funding identification_ Fairmont Blvd Off 2010 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 22 79 • • • Ultimate CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in. Each Direction from SR-241 to SR-71, 1-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector, Extension of Express Lanes on I-15 and SR-91 Improvements East of 1-15 Project No: 12 I Anticipated Completion: Post-2025 Project Cost Estimate To Be Determined Project Schedule' Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Completed 2007-2011 TBD 'Schedule for Ultimate Project anticipated Post-2025 unless funding is identified Existing bike path will be preserved Lane shown a for Proj #2 m Cony \,0 on CM OR ane shovin is for Proj #2 Project Description The approved Project Study Report (PSR) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, recommended the addition of a 5th lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, and the addition of collector -distributor (CD) lanes at the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (now part of Project #3) and at the I-15/SR-91 interchange. Subsequently, the Riverside County Transportation Commission's (RCTC) 10-Year Delivery Plan recommended the following in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construction of SR-91 (EB/WB)/I-15 (SB/N8) Express Lanes median direct connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the I-151SR-91 interchange southerly to I-15/Cajalco Road, and northerly to I-15/Hidden Valley Parkway (Ultimate Project). Due de current economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Project (Project #4), with reduced improvements, to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed between 2015 and 2035. The following is a summary of the proposed ultimate improvements: SR-91/1-15 median North Direct Connector and I-15 Express Lanes North to Hidden Valley Parkway; 145 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Galata) Road; general purpose lanes from 1-15 to Pierce Street- and general purpose lanes from SR-241 to SR-71_ Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects_ Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team_ Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple attematives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the SR-91 Eastbound (EB) Lane Addition (Project #1); the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (Project #3); the Initial CIP (Project #4) and the SR-241/SR-91 H©V/HOT Connector (Project tl43), which includes three alternatives for further study that will need to be coordinated with the proposed project_ Continued coordination will be required with the Sama.Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer line relocation and the U_S. Army Corps of Engineers riverbank protection project (Reach 9 Phase 28). enents The Initial and Ultimate CIP projects will reduce congestion arid deters by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce. Street and along 1-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road to the south and to Hidden Valley Parkway to the north. Traffic operation will improve: by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of CD roads and auxiliary lanes_ The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status Preliminary engineering is complete. The project is currently in the environmental phase that commenced in September 2007 and is anticipated to be completed by late-2011. Coal Canyon V C County Line on ingress/Egress lanes shown within the Express Lanes Green River Rd Lanes shown are for the SR-71/SR-91 Interchange (Prof #3) auxiliary lane, east to north flyover connector for SR-71 /SR-91 PSR Alternative 2, and EB SR-91 connector from Green River Road 2010 SR-91 Implementation Plan Ultimate project widens alf SR-91 lanes to full standard laneandshoulder widths from SR-241 to SR2 31 Auto Center Dr Maple St an off On On On . Orr OR Serfas Club Dr Lanes shown are for Green River and EB SR-91 CD (Proj #4) 80 On LincolriAv Off 37Lane.CD Road COnnector. rn Main St. EB on -ramp braids to join SR-91 as a merge ramp HOVIHOT lanes to I-15/Htdden Valley PKwy On On From From SB 15 NB 15 HOWHOT lanes to 1-15/Cajalco Rd LEGEND Edo 23 rg hw+ . InterchaKefRam Ftigp y i.rr County Laie HOV or HOT Lane itaat Existing Lane MIN Project Improvement Lane `sty! HOT Lanes Extension 111111' CD Road (Project #4) UM Auxiliary Lane -'� Project #1, #2, #3, and #d Elovated.A.-Lono Oacifity tlifiWCorridor A) from SR-24.1 to I-15 Project-140: 13 Anticipated Completion: TB13 Project Cost Estimate"' Capital Cost* $ 1,488,000,000 Supporttost(25%) $ 372s000i000 RA/V Cost $ 860,000,000 Total Project Cost $ 2.720,000,000 Project Schedule Conceptual Engirieering Pretirninaty Engineering Environmental Design Construction TB°. TBD TBD TBD *Capital costs include $160M for environmental mitigation excluding corresponding support cost, which is included in support cost estimate **Costs derived frorn Riverside County - Orange County MIS, January 2006 (2005 dollars) 2 VVB Lanes Project Description The linprovements primarily consist of constructing a new 4-lane eleVated expressway' near or wittiin the Santa Ana Canyon with freewayto-fieevitay connectors at SR-241 and 1-15_ The facility may iricitide managed lanes arid potential reversible operations. Key Considerations Choice of alignnierit vial be key to determining net capacity increase. IrreAementation of Corridor A may supersede the need for the direct connector_liuproVernent Project #6 (at SR-241/Sli-91), deperiding on the potential extension of the 91 EXPress Lanes_ Extensive right-of-way (MY) regtiired to implement the improvements if the alignment is not on the SR-91 conidor. if Project #4 or #12 is constructed and a 4-Gane elevated facility is proposed within the median of SR-91 thniugh Corona extensive managed lane closures would be required during construction (thus temporarily reducing SIR-91 capacity during c.cinsttuction). , Potential considerations for co -locating the Magnetic Levitation (Nlaglev) train (see Project #16)adjacent to Conidor A (and also SR-91) include providing a hvo-colurnn structure with a barrier between the trains and vehicles_ Concepts for Corridor A and Maglev within tlie SR-91 imam could jecniardize future opportunities for managed lanes within the SR-91 median, .such as the'extension of 91 Express Lanes. An alternative could be studied for the median Corridor A viackict along with reduced SR-91 geometric standards to minimize RAN impacts. Also, dired connectors (such as for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) / High Occupancy Toll (HOT) at 1-15/SR-91) to/from the median could be precluded by Maglev columns located within the same median area. Caltrans and Maglev highway R/W, maintenance, safety, and operations considerations Would need to be analyzed if shared use with a Maglev faddy Were pursued. Additional mitigation costs may be required fOr improvements to SR-241 and SR-133. Corridor A as managed lanes, with potential extension of 91 Express Lanes to 1-15 (Project #4 and #12), may affect traffic distribution due to "parallel' tolled facilities. 2 EB Lanes Abbreviations: Westbound = VVB Eastbound = EB 4111 VlAtiFISar- Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) Cross -Section 91 Benefits The project would provide significant congestion relief by allowing vehicles to bypass the at -grade freeway lanes and local arterial interchanges between SIR-241 arid 1-15. Connections are propnsed directly between SR-91, SR-241, and i-15. Current Status This project is identified in the Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as part of the Locally Preferred Strategy to improve mobility between Riverside County and Orange County. Additional Conceptual engineering is being considered_ 2010 SR-91 Implementation Plan 24 81 Anaheim t Ontario International Airport High Speed Flail Project No: 15 Anticipated Completion: Post-2030 Project Cost Estimate To Be Determined Project Schedule To Be Determined LEGEND = Existing Highway High Speed Rail Representative Aigirnent ProjectDescription PropoSetsfor a new highspeed rail corridor from Anaheim to Ontario are - eWed:-in this project This -project includes an alternative that would use SR-94 right-otway, or wouki be aligned adjacent to SR-91, right -of --way, or could potentially tie co -located with the Major liwe.strtzent: Stud}+ (MIS} Corridor- A (Project #13) alignment_ Another alignment` opportunity is being investigated along SR-57. Key Considerations Alternative alignment impacts to SR-91 right-of-way envelope andfor Santa Ana -River are undetermined_ The choice of alignment will potentially impact MIS Corridor A (Project #13). Right-of-way (WW1 will be required to implement the improvements Potential considerations for co-iacating the Magnetic Levitation (Magtev) train adjacent to Corridor A (and also SR-91) include providing a two -column structure with a barrier between the trains and vehicles. Caltrans and Maglev highway RAW, maintenance safety, and operations considerations would need :to be analyzed if -shared use with a Magley facility were pursued. See the MIS-. Corridor (Project#13) for additional considerations Coordination with Metrotink',improvements (Project #9) will be required: Benefits The pmject would; provide congestion relief by providing a direct' high-speedfhigh-capacity connection with Ontario International Airport for Orange County air passengers and business need -day deliveries_ Relieves congestion on SR-91 by providing additional capacity in the corridor: Current Status Conceptual engineering studies are .currently underway_. Congress has approved $47M for the environmental phase of the project. REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY 2010 SR-91 implementation Plan 83 26 • SECTION3: COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS The following exhibits represent completed projects from previous Plans and are intended to be used as a reference to illustrate the progress made since the inception of the Plan. Note, some projects listed in the Plan as completed (see Section 1, Project Accomplishments) are not included herein since there was no exhibit created for use with prior Plans (such as for restriping projects, various safety enhancements, minor operational improvements, etc.). 2010 SR-91 Implementation Plan 27 84 • Green River Read Overcrossing Replacement Appendix Project -No: A Actual -Completion: March 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost Support Cost R/W Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Prefirnhary Engineering Environmental Design Constructor' $ 21,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $301,000 $24,391,000 Completed Completed CoMpleted Completed Project Schedule Caltrans Equivalents: Preliminary Engirieering = Environmental = PA/ED Design = PS&E Abbreviations: CD = Collector Distributor t ie I- IR = Future HOV = High Occupancy SHLD Shoulder 1 t1 ;Pal I21ZW•1i MLAE tacit.* me u i •wi " LW ‘P " WS Project Description Impmvements primarily consist of replacing the existing Greeri Riier RciadpvercrOssing- with a nexpilit,:p? witire, 4-span overcrossing to accommodate hitee widerrt of SR-91. The interior spans will acc.ommodaterfjpifo eight = inline lanes in each direction including two HOV rAet Theixterior spans can accernmodate two lanes, either fcsauirWlanes OF collector disthbutor roads. EntrarErAnr4ot ramps will be realigned and widened to acanivimdfe Welly bri#, yet the interchange will Tetiillnits-tur-Tent collrigt'lla- ll'3n- Aalt-7•519nas will he installed at the ramp intersectionsataniP-and bridge improvements wilthe constnicted wftbOexis right,of way. -7 - ; r. Key Consid Desig erface is " "Jed with the Eastbound Lane Addition "from S . AoSR- ),,SR-71/SR-91 Interchange ImproverrieritS, , S ' ement Project, and SR-241/S11-91 V/14 'Conn r - ct will improve the level of service at ramp and local et i rsections at the interchange,. Improvements wdl reduce queues that extend into the freeway's general purpose "'k,faries, thuscontributing to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status The project began construction in March 2007 and was completed in March 2009_ New Bridge umitnalweE 414E! . a url EB GREEN RIVER BRIDGE CROSS-SECTION NOTE: All dimensions are approximate 1®l`oll • 79' 2010 SR-91 Implementation Plan 28 85 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Stafion 13aildng Structure 4,1;000( Proiectilo; Project Costs Papiial:Cost. Support.Cost R/W Cost Total Project Cost $ 20,0,00,000 $ 5,000,0CKI $0 $ 25,000,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmental Completed Design Completed Construction Compl , Project Description: The projectproVides a. sit leve slant. The Constmetien is , Metentirtit*ticiriPrOpertyit Key Considerations witi 1;065 park g North Main St Proposed improve efts vieta4..constructed within 'Oreatino.tight .of Way. Currently there. ai 7Q0 user'S:41 the facility, 20Q More Mar were previously able* accsitiodate. Additionally ROTC has opened lip the lotto part and riktarpools,kand vanpools and has. issued over 120 Permits- for Carpoote‘to 3* the expanded station. This shows"an added' beffett of suppnitihg carpooling as well.:as.tranaitle tffaet congestion R-91. partring crirrentlY exceeds the capaCity at tfrefitisrtir Main station. New .-parking c.apacity will allow titetrotink 'increase thereby diverting vehicle trips limn SR-91; --Status, wastnitiated in January 2008 and was core in June 12009J The project was funded vrith Federal' Congo0.an Manarjernent Quatity MAC)) funds • . . „ . . , ....... _ 2010 SR-91 Implementation Plan 29 86 • • SECTION 4: REFERENCES The following documents and resources were used in the development of the 2010 Plan. Data was provided by OCTA, ROTC, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA), and other agencies. Project Study Report/Project Report "Right of Way Relinquishment on Westbound State Route 91 Between Weir Canyon Road and Coal Canyon", May 2010 SR-91/Fairmont Boulevard Feasibility Study, December 2009 SR-91 Feasibility Study from SR-57 to SR-55, December 2009 Feasibility Evaluation Report for Irvine -Corona Expressway Tunnels, December 2009 Renewed Measure M Strategic Plan, June 2009 Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for Eastbound SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71, May 2009 Project Study Report "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County", April 2009 91 Express Lanes Extension and State Route 241 Connector Feasibility Study, March 2009 Project Study Report/Project Report "On Gypsum Canyon Road Between the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Westbound Off - Ramp (PM 16.4) and the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Eastbound Direct On -Ramp (PM 16.4)", June 2008 California Transportation Commission, Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), February 2007 Project Study Report "On Route 91 from Green River Road to Serfas Club Drive in the City of Corona in Riverside County", December 2006 Orange County Transportation Authority Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, November 2006 Project Study Report "On Route 91 from State Route 241 in Orange County to Pierce Street in the City of Riverside in Riverside County", October 2006 Riverside County -Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) — Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report, January 2006 Preliminary design plans for Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71, 2006 Project Study Report "Westbound State Route 91 Auxiliary Lane from the NB SR-55/WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange", July 2004 Project Study Report "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 _Interchange in Orange County", April 2004 California — Nevada Interstate Maglev Project Report, Anaheim -Ontario Segment; California -Nevada Super Speed Train Commission, American Magline Group, August 2003 SR-91 Congestion Relief Alternatives Analysis, Caltrans, January 2003 Route Concept Reports for SR-91, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 Various Preliminary Drawings and Cross Sections, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 2010 SR-91 Implementation Plan 30 87 i AGENDA ITEM 8F i RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Lisa DaSilva, Capital Projects Manager Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement with Southstar Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for Construction Management Services and Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans for Construction of the Interstate 215 Widening Project from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road, North of the City of Murrieta WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 10-31-079-00to Southstar Engineering & Consulting, Inc. (Southstar) to perform construction management (CM) services, materials testing, and construction surveying for the 1-215 widening, Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road project, in the city of Murrieta, for the base amount of $4,097,564, plus a contingency amount of $402,436, for a total not to exceed amount of $4.5 million; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency required for the project; - 4) Approve the Cooperative Agreement No. 10-31-110-00 construction of the project; and 5) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant execute the cooperative agreement and amendments to this agreement. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: work as may be with Caltrans for to legal counsel review, to future non -funding related The Commission requires the services of a qualified firm to provide CM, materials testing, and construction surveying services for construction of the project. Services are anticipated to include pre -construction plan, specification, and estimate review; construction project advertising, bid analysis, and award; Agenda Item 8F 88 construction inspection; claim analysis; contractor interface and contract administration; office engineering; and other duties as appropriate for CM, as well as materials testing and construction surveying. Selection Process A request for qualifications (RFQ) for CM services, material testing, and construction surveying for the project was issued on February 22, 2010, with consultant statement of qualifications (SOQ) due on March 25. The Commission received five SOQs from AECOM, Caltrop Corporation, Harris & Associates, MACM Construction Management, and Southstar. An evaluation committee was appointed to review the SOQs received and to conduct firm interviews. The evaluation committee members included representatives from Commission staff, Bechtel, and the city of Murrieta. Based on the committee's evaluation of written SOQ submittals, and pursuant to the terms of the RFQ, the committee shortlisted three of the five offerors and invited those firms to the interview portion of the evaluation and selection process. The short listed firms included: • AECOM • Caltrop Corporation • Southstar Interviews with the above -referenced firms were conducted on April 22, and, after final scoring by the evaluation committee, Southstar was ranked the most qualified firm under the terms of the RFQ. Subsequently, staff has negotiated the scope (including the appropriate level of effort, labor categories/mix, etc.), cost, and schedule proposal from Southstar for the project services and established a fair and reasonable price. A pre -award audit of Southstar's payroll, including overhead rates, and accounting system was conducted by a certified public accounting firm retained by the Commission. Price negotiations resulted in a 20% reduction in profit by Southstar and its participating subconsultants. 1n addition, staff has been working with Caltrans to develop a : cooperative agreement between the Commission and Caltrans that defines the respective roles and responsibilities for the construction of the project. The draft cooperative agreement is included as Attachment 2. Agenda Item 8F • 89 • • Staff Recommendation Staff recommends Agreement No. 10-31-079-00 be awarded to Southstar to perform CM services, materials testing, and construction surveying for the 1-215' widening project from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road, in the city of Murrieta, based on the final project scope and cost included with Attachment 1, for the base amount of $4,097,564, plus contingency amount of $402,436 for unanticipated changes, for a total not to exceed amount of $4.5 million. Staff further recommends that the Commission approve Cooperative Agreement No. 10-31-110-00 with Caltrans for construction of the project and authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the cooperative agreement and future non -funding related amendments to this agreement. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12+ Amount: $1,500,000 $3,000,000 Source of Funds: CMIA, STIP, Measure A Budget Ad ustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 003022 81302 262 31 81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \j/6440.1 Date: 06/16/10 Attachments: 1) Agreement 10-31-079-00 with Southstar Engineering & Consulting, Inc. 2) Cooperative Agreement 10-31-110-00 with Caltrans (District Agreement 08-1462) Agenda Item 8F 90 • ATTACHMENT 1 AGREEMENT NO. 10-31-079-00 MODEL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT WITH [ CONSULTANT ] FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, MATERIALS TESTING AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING SERVICES FOR THE INTERSTATE 215 WIDENING, MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD TO SCOTT ROAD PROJECT 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2010, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("the Commission") and [ NAME OF FIRM 1 ("Consultant'), a [ LEGAL STATUS OF CONSULTANT e.g., CORPORATION ]. 2. RECITALS. 2.1 On November 8, 1988 the Voters of Riverside County approved Measure A authorizing the collection of a one-half percent (1/2 %) retail transactions and use tax (the "tax") to fund transportation programs and improvements within the County of Riverside, and adopting the Riverside County Transportation Improvement Plan (the "Plan"). 2.2 Pursuant to Public Utility Code Sections 240000 et seq. the Commission is authorized to allocate the proceeds of the Tax in furtherance of the Plan. 2.3 On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved an extension of the Measure A tax for an additional thirty (30) years for the continued funding of transportation and improvements within the County of Riverside. 2.4 Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the Commission on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing construction management, engineering surveying and testing services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California (as necessary), and is familiar with the plans of the Commission. 91 2.5 The Commission desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the Interstate 215 Widening, Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road Project ("Project"), as set forth in this Agreement. 3. TERMS. 3.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant shall furnish all technical and professional services, including labor, material, equipment, transportation, supervision and expertise, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional construction management, engineering surveying and testing services necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.2 Commencement of Services. The Consultant shall commence work upon receipt of a written "Notice to Proceed" or "Limited Notice to Proceed" from Commission. 3.3 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of execution of this Agreement or the date of issuance of the Notice to Proceed by the Commission, whichever occurs first, to the issuance by the Commission to Consultant of a Notice of Final Acceptance, as defined in paragraph 3.12 below, or June 30, 2012, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. All applicable indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect following the termination of this Agreement. 3.4 Commission's Representative. The Commission hereby designates the Commission's Executive Director, or his or her designee, to act as its Representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Commission's Representative"). Commission's Representative shall have the authority to act on behalf of the Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Commission's Representative shall also review and give approval, as needed, to the details of Consultant's work as it progresses. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the Commission's Representative or his ocher designee. 3.5 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates ( INSERT NAME OR TITLE j to act as its Representative for the performance of . this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to act on behalf of Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultants Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his professional skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all 92 • • portions of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall work closely and cooperate fully with Commission's Representative and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction over, or an interest in, the Services. Consultant's Representative shall be available to the Commission staff at all reasonable times. Any substitution in Consultant's Representative shall be approved in writing by Commission's Representative. 3.6 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to the Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval by the Commission. In the event that the Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of the key personnel, the Commission shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause, pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.14. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are: j LIST NAMES AND TITLES ]. 3.7 Preliminary Review of Work. All reports, working papers, and similar work products prepared for submission in the course of providing Services under this Agreement shall be submitted to the Commission's Representative in draft form, and the Commission may require revisions of such drafts prior to formal submission and approval. In the event plans and designs are to be developed as part of the Project, final detailed plans and designs shall be contingent upon obtaining environmental clearance as may be required in connection with the Project. In the event that Commission's Representative, in his sole discretion, determines the formally submitted work product to be not in accordance with the standard of care established under this contract, Commission's Representative may require Consultant to revise and resubmit the work at no cost to the Commission. 3.8 Appearance at Hearings. if and when required by the Commission, Consultant shall render assistance at public hearings or other meetings related to the Project or necessary to the performance of the Services. However, Consultant shall not be required to, and will not, render any decision, interpretation or recommendation regarding questions of a legal nature or which may be construed as constituting a legal opinion. 3.9 Standard of Care: Licenses. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform all Services, duties and obligations required by this Agreement to fully and adequately complete the Project. Consultant shall perform the Services and duties in conformance to and consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Consultant further represents and warrants to the Commission that its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. 93 Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the Commission, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by, the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement arising from the Consultant's errors and omissions. Any employee of Consultant or its sub - consultants who is determined by the Commission to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the Commission, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project. 3.10 Opportunity to Cure. Commission may provide Consultant an opportunity to cure, at Consultant's expense, all errors and omissions which may be disclosed during Project implementation. Should Consultant fail to make such correction in a timely manner, such correction may be made by the Commission, and the cost thereof charged to Consultant. 3.11 Inspection of Work. Consultant shall allow the Commission's Representative to inspect or review Consultant's work in progress at any reasonable time. 3.12 Final Acceptance. Upon determination by the Commission that Consultant has satisfactorily completed the Services required under this Agreement and within the term set forth in Section 3.3, the Commission shall give Consultant a written Notice of Final Acceptance. Upon receipt of such notice, Consultant shall incur no further costs hereunder, unless otherwise specified in the Notice of Final Acceptance. Consultant may request issuance of a Notice of Final Acceptance when, in its opinion, it has satisfactorily completed all Services required under the terms of this Agreement. In the event copyrights are permitted under this Agreement, then in connection with Federal funding, it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the United States Department of Transportation shall have the royalty -free non-exclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, the work for governmental purposes. 3.13 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. For example, and not by way of limitation, Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all implementing regulations, design standards, specifications, previous commitments that must be incorporated in the design of the Project, and administrative controls including those of the United States Department of Transportation. Compliance with Federal procedures may include completion of the applicable environmental documents and approved by a governmental body. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be 94 • contrary to the requirements of laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.14 Termination. 3.14.1 Notice; Reason. Commission may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, at any time by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof ("Notice of Termination"). Such termination may be for Commission's convenience or because of Consultant's failure to perform its duties and obligations under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the failure of Consultant to timely perform Services pursuant to the Schedule of Services described in Section 3.15 of this Agreement. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.14.2 Discontinuance of Services. Upon receipt of the written Notice of Termination, Consultant shall discontinue all affected Services as directed in the Notice or as otherwise provided herein, and deliver to the Commission all Documents and Data, as defined in this Agreement, as may have been prepared or accumulated by Consultant in performance of the Services, whether completed or in progress. 3.14.3 Effect of Termination For Convenience. If the termination is to be for the convenience of the Commission, the Commission shall compensate Consultant for Services fully and adequately provided through the effective date of termination. Such payment shall include a prorated amount of profit, if applicable, but no amount shall be paid for anticipated profit on unperformed Services. Consultant shall provide documentation deemed adequate by Commission's Representative to show the Services actually completed by Consultant prior to the effective date .of termination. This Agreement shall terminate on the effective date of the Notice of Termination. 3.14.4 Effect of Termination for Cause. If the termination is for cause, Consultant shall be compensated for those Services which have been fully and adequately completed and accepted by the Commission as of the date the Commission provides the Notice of Termination. In such case, the Commission may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise. Further, Consultant shall be liable to the Commission for any reasonable additional costs incurred by the Commission to revise work for which the Commission has compensated Consultant under this Agreement, but which the Commission has determined in its sole discretion needs to be revised, in part or whole, to complete the Project because it did not meet the standard of care established in Section 3.9. Termination of this Agreement for cause may be considered by the Commission in determining whether to enter into future agreements with Consultant. 95 • 3.14.5 Cumulative Remedies. The rights and remedies of the Parties provided in this Section are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Agreement. 3.14.6 Procurement of Similar Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated, in whole or in part, as provided by this Section, the Commission may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it deems appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.14.7 Waivers. Consultant, in executing this Agreement, shall be deemed to have waived any and all claims for damages which may otherwise arise from the Commission's termination of this Agreement, for convenience or cause, as provided in this Section. 3.15 Schedule and Progress of Services. 3.15.1 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultants conformance with the Schedule, the Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of Commission's Representative, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.15.2 Modification of the Schedule. Consultant shall regularly report to the Commission, through correspondence or progress reports, its progress in providing required Services within the scheduled time periods. Commission shall be promptly informed of all anticipated delays. In the event that Consultant determines that a schedule modification is necessary, Consultant shall promptly submit a revised Schedule of Services for approval by Commission's Representative. 3.15.3 Trend Meetings. Consultant shall conduct trend meetings with the Commission's Representative and other interested parties, as requested by the Commission, on a bi-weekly basis or as may be mutually scheduled by the Parties at a standard day and time. These trend meetings will encompass focused and informal discussions concerning scope, schedule, and current progress of Services, relevant cost issues, and future Project objectives. Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation and distribution of meeting agendas to be received by the Commission and other attendees no later than three (3) working days prior to the meeting. 3.15.4 Progress Reports. As part of its monthly invoice, Consultant shall submit a progress report, in a form determined by the Commission, which will 96 • • • _ indicate the progress achieved during the previous month in relation to the Schedule of Services. Submission of such progress report by Consultant shall be a condition precedent to receipt of payment from the Commission for each monthly invoice submitted. 3.16 Delay in Performance. 3.16.1 Excusable Delays. Should Consultant be delayed or prevented from the timely performance of any act or Services required by the terms of the Agreement by reason of acts of God or of the public enemy, acts or omissions of the Commission or other govemmental agencies in either their sovereign or contractual capacities, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes or unusually severe weather, performance of such act shall be excused for the period of such delay. 3.16.2 Written Notice. If Consultant believes it is entitled to an extension of time due to conditions set forth in subsection 3.16.1, Consultant shall provide written notice to the Commission within seven (7) working days from the time Consultant knows, or reasonably should have known, that performance of the Services will be delayed due to such conditions. Failure of Consultant to provide such timely notice shall constitute a waiver by Consultant of any right to an excusable delay in time of performance. 3.16.3 Mutual Agreement. Performance of any Services under this Agreement may be delayed upon mutual agreement of the Parties. Upon such agreement, Consultant's Schedule of Services shall be extended as necessary by the Commission. Consultant shall take all reasonable steps to minimize delay in completion, and additional costs, resulting from any such extension. 3.17 Status of Consultant/Subconsultants. 3.17.1 Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee, agent or representative of the Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such personnel, including but not limited to, social security taxes, income tax withholdings, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 97 3.17.2 Prevailing Wages. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. CPrevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at the Commission's offices. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. Certified Payrolls are to be submitted whenever required by Prevailing Wage laws. 3.17.3 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.17.4 Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Agreement, except as expresslystated herein, without prior written approval of the Commission. If Consultant wishes to use a firm as a subcontractor which is not specified in the proposal upon which this Agreement was awarded, prior written approval must be obtained from the Commission. The Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Consultant has, as part of its proposal, identified certain companies/firms that will be subconsultants utilized by Consultant CSubconsultants") for Project delivery. A list of said Subconsultants is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" Part 2 and made a part hereof. The Commission hereby approves the use by Consultant of the Subconsultants identified in Exhibit "C" Part 2. In the event and prior to the replacement of any Subconsultant approved herein, the Consultant shall seek and obtain the Commission's written approval. Exhibit "C" Part 2 also sets forth the rates at which each Subconsultant shall bill the Consultant for Services and that are subject to reimbursement by the Commission to Consultant. The cost of Addition Direct Costs, as defined in exhibit "C," shall be the same for both the Consultant and all subconsultants, unless otherwise identified in Exhibit "C" Part 2. 98 • Consultant acknowledges that approval of Consultant's utilization of the identified Subconsultants together with the incorporation of Subconsultants' rate schedules and cost proposals into this Agreement shall in no way be construed to create any contractual relationship between any Subconsultant and the Commission. The Subconsultant rate schedules and cost proposals contained herein are for accounting purposes only. In the event that any Subconsultant shall bring any action, claim or proceeding purporting to enforce any right purportedly arising under this Agreement, the Consultant shall be responsible for the Commission's reasonable legal fees without regard to the merits of any such claim. 3.18 Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality. 3.18.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub -license any and all copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the Commission. Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission's sole risk. 3.18.2Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media ("Intellectual Property") prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement as well as any other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement. The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid 99 for wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant, and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute separate written assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon request of Commission. Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above -referenced Intellectual Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission. All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which are not the copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise • identified and stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as provided herein. Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub -license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional, or supplemental work created under this Agreement. 3.18.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.19 Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to alleged negligent acts, omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this • 100 Insurance or includes a general aggregate limit, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Statutory Workers' Compensation limits as required by the applicable Labor Code and Employer's Liability limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 3.20.3 Professional Liability. Consultant shall procure and maintain, and require its sub -consultants to procure and maintain, for a period of five (5) years following completion of the Project, errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to their profession. Such insurance shall be in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per claim. 3.20.4 Aircraft Liability Insurance. Consultant, prior to the direct or indirect use of any civil aircraft to provide Service under this Agreement, shall procure and maintain, or cause to be procured and maintained, aircraft liability insurance or equivalent form, with a single limit of not less than $5,000,000 per each occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non -owned aircraft and passengers, and shall name, or be endorsed to name, the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, and agents as additional insureds with respect to the Services or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant. 3.20.5Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. The general liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the Services or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (B) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an 102 unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, ,employees and agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that: (A) coverage shall not be suspended, voided or canceled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the Commission; and (B) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents. 3.20.6 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the Commission does not approve the deductibles or self -insured retentions as presented, Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.20.7 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A: VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Commission. 3.20.8 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance, policies, at any time. 3.20.9 Other Insurance. At its option, the Commission may require such additional coverage(s), limits and/or the reduction of deductibles or retentions it considers reasonable and prudent based upon risk factors that may directly or indirectly impact the Project. In retaining this option Commission does not warrant Consultant's 103 insurance program to be adequate. Consultant shall have the right to purchase insurance in addition to the insurance required in this Section. 3.21 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.22 Fees and Payment. 3.22.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall be on the basis of direct costs plus a fixed fee as further set forth in Exhibit "C" and shall not exceed the maximum amount of r INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT ] ($[ INSERT NUMERICAL DOLLAR AMOUNT ]), without written approval of Commission's Executive Director. 3.22.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the Statement. Charges specific to each Milestone listed in the Schedule of Services shall be listed separately on an attachment to each statement. Each statement shall be accompanied by a monthly progress report and spreadsheets showing hours expended for each task for each month and the total Project to date. Each statement shall include a cover sheet bearing a certification as to the accuracy of the statement signed by the Consultant's Project Manager or other authorized officer. 3.22.3 Additional Work. Any work or activities that are in addition to, or otherwise outside of, the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall only be performed pursuant to a separate agreement between the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Commission's Executive Director may make a change to the Agreement as permitted by law or authorized by the Commission. . • i 104 • • (a) In addition to the changes authorized above, a modification which is signed by Consultant and the Commission's Executive Director, other than a Cardinal Change, may be made in order to: (1) make a negotiated equitable adjustment to the Agreement price, delivery schedule and other terms resulting from the issuance of a Change Order, (2) reflect definitive letter contracts, and (3) reflect other agreements of the parties modifying the terms of this Agreement ("Bilateral Contract Modification"). (b) Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for any change, without written authorization from the Commission's Executive Director as set forth herein. In the event such a change authorization is not issued and signed by the Commission's Executive Director, Consultant shall not provide such change. 3.22.4 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by the Commission's Representative. . 3.23 Prohibited Interests. 3.23.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 3.23.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of the Commission, during the term of his or her service with the Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.23.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission, is prohibited. 3.23.4 Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant represents and warrants that he/she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he/she has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, 105 other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or formation of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability pursuant to Section 3.14, or at its • discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 3.23.5 Covenant Against Expenditure of Local Agency, State or Federal Funds for Lobbying. Omitted Intentionally 3.24 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred and fees charged under this Agreement. The Federal Acquisition Regulations in Title 48, CFR 31 shall be the goveming factors regarding allowable elements of cost. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the Commission or any duly authorized representative of the Commission during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of any and all ledgers and books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and any other records or documents created pursuant to this Agreement. All such information shall be retained by Consultant for at least three (3) years following termination of this Agreement. 3.25 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 3.26 Right to Employ Other Consultants. Commission reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with the Project. As required, Consultant shall cooperate fully with any other consultant engaged by the Commission on the Project. 3.27 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed with the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.28 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to Have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorneys' fees and, all other costs of such actions. 3.29 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. • • • 106 3.30 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.31 Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONSULTANT: Attn: COMMISSION: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Executive Director Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty- eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.32 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 3.33 Amendment or Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.34 Entire Agreement_ This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements or understandings. 3.35 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.36 Provisions Applicable When Federal Department of Transportation Funds Are Involved. Omitted Intentionally 3.37 No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be 107 deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. [Signatures on following page] • • 108 • • SIGNATURE PAGE TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: CONSULTANT By: [_INSERT NAME 1 Signature Chairman Approved as to Form: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel Name Title 109 • • SCOPE OF WORK Background Information RCTC is seeking proposals from qualified engineering professionals to provide Construction Management (CM), Materials Testing, and Construction Surveying Services for construction of 1-215 Widening, Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road Project located in the city of Murrieta, CA. Services are anticipated to include pre -construction plan, specification, and estimate (PS&E) review, construction project advertising, bid analysis, and award; construction inspection; claim analysis, contractor interface and contract administration; office engineering; and other assorted duties as appropriate for construction management, as well as materials testing and construction surveying. Performance Requirements Construction Management: OFFEROR shall furnish a Project Manager to coordinate OFFEROR operations with COMMISSION. The Project Manager shall be responsible for all matters related to OFFEROR personnel and operations. It is recommended that a single point of contact or Resident Engineer be assigned to direct and coordinate construction activities under this contract. Other Assistant Resident Engineers may be assigned to each specific project responsibilities as needed. Resident Engineer shall be a Civil Engineer, registered in the State of California. The Resident Engineer shall be in responsible charge of construction activity within the Project. The Resident Engineer shall be responsible for daily on -site inspections and decisions regarding erosion control that comprise a small portion of the Project. The number of OFFEROR personnel assigned to the project will vary throughout the duration of the contract. OFFEROR personnel will be assigned, in varying levels of responsibility, as needed by the OFFEROR to meet the project schedule, project requirements, and construction activities. Resumes of personnel must be submitted to COMMISSION for review and approval prior to assignment to the Project. COMMISSION and OFFEROR will jointly determine the quality and quantity of services that are required by OFFEROR personnel. Personnel selected for assignment by OFFEROR shall be made available for personal interviews prior to acceptance by COMMISSION. If, in the opinion of COMMISSION, an individual lacks adequate experience, the individual may be rejected or may be accepted on a trial basis until such time the individual's ability to perform the required services has been demonstrated. If, at any time, the performance of OFFEROR personnel is unsatisfactory to COMMISSION, COMMISSION may release him/her by written notice and may request another qualified person be assigned. 110 If OFFEROR personnel are on leave of absence, the Project Manager shall provide approved, equally qualified replacement personnel until the assigned personnel returns to the Project. The typical workday includes all hours worked by the construction Contractor. If necessary, overtime for OFFEROR personnel may be required. The construction Contractor's operations may be restricted to specific hours during the week, which shall become the normal workday for OFFEROR personnel. The Project Manager, with concurrence from COMMISSION, shall have the authority to increase, decrease, or eliminate OFFEROR personnel work hours dependent on the schedule and requirements of the construction Contractor. All overtime required by OFFEROR personnel shall be approved and authorized by COMMISSION prior to each occurrence. OFFEROR personnel shall be knowledgeable of and comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. OFFEROR personnel shall cooperate and consult with COMMISSION, State, and City officials during the course of the Project. OFFEROR personnel shall perform duties as may be required to assure that construction is being performed in accordance with the Project plans and specifications. OFFEROR personnel shall keep accurate and timely records and document all work performed by the Contractor and OFFEROR. OFFEROR shall monitor for Contractor's compliance with the labor standards provisions of the projects and the related wage determination decisions of the Secretary of Labor. OFFEROR personnel shall assist COMMISSION and local agencies in obtaining compliance with the safety and accident prevention provisions of the projects. Local agencies will retain jurisdictional control for traffic control. All services required hereunder shall be performed in accordance with California Department of Transportation guidelines, regulations, policies, procedures, manuals, and standards, except as noted in the special provisions. Materials Testing: The number of field testing personnel assigned to the project will vary throughout the duration of the construction contract. OFFEROR personnel will be assigned as needed by the Resident Engineer to meet the schedule of the construction contractor. It is anticipated that at least one field technician will be required throughout the construction contract period. At times, additional technicians may be required to provide support for on -going construction activities. The duration of assignments could vary from a minimum of a few days to the full term of the project. OFFEROR personnel will be available within two (2) days of written notification by COMMISSION. • 111 • • • It is the intent of COMMISSION to maintain a consistency of material testing quality throughout each phase of each project. OFFEROR is therefore encouraged to provide, where ever and whenever possible, the same field personnel for the duration of construction of each project. On days when work is not performed by the construction contractor, such as rainy or unsuitable weather days, OFFEROR will not provide services unless authorized by the COMMISSION Construction Manager. Resumes of materials testing personnel must be submitted to COMMISSION for review and approval prior to assignment to the Project. If, at any time, the level of performance of any testing personnel is below expectations, COMMISSION may release that field person and request that another be assigned as needed. If a member of OFFEROR's personnel is on a leave of absence, OFFEROR's project manager will provide an equally qualified replacement employee until the original member returns to work. The replacement employee will meet all the requirements of a permanently assigned employee. All personnel will be knowledgeable of, and comply with, all applicable local, Caltrans, and federal regulations; cooperate and consult with COMMISSION and local agency officials during the course of the contract; and perform other duties as may be required to assure that the construction is being performed in accordance with the project plans and specifications. OFFEROR's personnel will keep records and document the work as directed by the Resident Engineer. OFFEROR personnel shall assist COMMISSION and local agencies in obtaining compliance with the safety and accident prevention provisions of the projects. Local agencies will retain jurisdictional control for traffic control. All services required hereunder will be performed in accordance with Caltrans regulations, policies, procedures, manuals, and standards. Construction Surveying: OFFEROR will furnish surveying crew(s) to perform construction surveys for the project. The number of survey crew(s) assigned to the project will vary throughout the duration of the construction contract. OFFEROR personnel will be assigned as needed by the Resident Engineer to meet the schedule of the construction contractor. It is the intent of COMMISSION to maintain a consistency of construction survey quality throughout each phase of each project. Therefore, OFFEROR is encouraged to provide the same field personnel for the duration of construction. It is important that the Field Party Chief(s) assigned to a project be completely familiar with the survey requirements and the assignments for the project. Construction surveying will not be performed when conditions such as weather, traffic, and other factors prevent safe and efficient operation. 112 Resumes of OFFEROR personnel and certification must be submitted to COMMISSION for review. OFFEROR personnel must be approved by COMMISSION prior to assignment to a project. COMMISSION and OFFEROR will have the responsibility of determining the quality and quantity of work performed by OFFEROR personnel. lf, at any time, the level of performance by OFFEROR personnel is below expectations, COMMISSION may release the survey crew member and request that another be assigned. If OFFEROR's survey crew personnel assigned to the project is on a leave of absence, the Project Manager will provide an equally qualified replacement(s) until the original employee(s) returns to work. The replacement will be required to meet all the requirements of the permanently assigned employee. OFFEROR personnel will: • Be knowledgeable of, and comply with all, applicable local, Caltrans, state, and federal regulations. • Cooperate and consult with COMMISSION officials during the course of the contract. • Perform duties as may be required to assure construction is performed in accordance with the project plans and specifications. ' • Keep records and document work as directed by the Resident Engineer. All services required hereunder will be performed in accordance with Caltrans regulations, policies, procedures, manuals, and standards. Duties and Responsibilities 1. Pre -construction Services a. Plan Review OFFEROR shall review construction contract documents prior to construction. Tasks include review of plans, specifications, technical reports, resident engineer's pending files, and associated items in order to verify completeness and consistency throughout the Project. At minimum, OFFEROR shall check for quantity discrepancies, potential conflicts, constructability, and consistency between plans, specifications and pay items. b. Schedule OFFEROR shall review the proposed Project schedule, compare it to the Project plans and specifications, and provide recommendations to COMMISSION, as appropriate, to ensure efficiency of Contractor and OFFEROR operations and safe and expeditious completion of the Project. • • • 113 • c. Budget OFFEROR shall review the Project estimate and provide recommendations to COMMISSION, as appropriate, to ensure efficient utilization of funds and control of project costs. 2. Bid Process a. Bid Documents OFFEROR shall assist COMMISSION, as requested, with the following tasks: 1) Review of bid documents 2) Preparation of bid tabulations b. • Pre -construction Meetings OFFEROR shall assist COMMISSION in conducting one or more, pre -construction meetings with all involved parties on the Project. Parties may include, but are not limited to, the Contractor, the design engineer, county, cities, utility companies, and developers. c. Contract Award OFFEROR shall assist COMMISSION, as requested, with the following tasks: 1) Review of bid for completeness and responsiveness 2) Perform bid analysis 3) Development of contractor payment schedules, and other procedural items. 4) Checking Contractor references, licenses, insurance, and sureties. 5) Coordination with prospective Contractor for award of construction contract(s). All processes will be consistent with procedures outlined by the California Department of Transportation for Special Funded Programs. 3. Project Administration a. OFFEROR shall administer project construction contract using Caltrans Construction Manual as a guideline. 114 g• b. OFFEROR shall conduct regular project coordination meetings with Contractor, COMMISSION, local agencies, and design engineer, as appropriate. c. OFFEROR shall prepare Contractor progress payments and maintain payment records and supporting documentation. All progress payments shall be reviewed by COMMISSION for approval. d. OFFEROR shall establish and maintain Project records. Project record keeping shall include, but are not limited to, correspondence, memoranda, contract documents, change orders, claims, COMMISSION and engineer directives, meeting minutes, shop drawings, supplementary drawings, and requests for payment. OFFEROR shall maintain a record of the names, addresses, and telephone and fax numbers of the Contractors, subcontractors, and principal material suppliers. e. OFFEROR shall establish and maintain a filing system for each Project using the Caltrans Construction Manual as a guideline_ f. OFFEROR shall monitor Contractors' construction schedules on an ongoing basis and alert COMMISSION to conditions that may lead to delays in completion of the Project. OFFEROR shall prepare and submit a monthly Activity Summary Report for each project. The activity report shall include construction activity, accomplishments, and status of project budget and schedule. h. OFFEROR shall review and ensure compliance with environmental requirements. i. OFFEROR shall participate in partnering sessions with the Contractor, COMMISSION, and Local Agencies, as required. . j. OFFEROR shall ensure that the Project meets all provisions of the Caltrans Quality Assurance Program Manual. k. OFFEROR shall review Contractors' certified payroll records and assist COMMISSION with labor compliance. OFFEROR shall ensure that the Project meets all provisions of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). ` m. OFFEROR shall assure that the Project meets all applicable regulations of the Air Quality Management District (AQMD). 4. Construction Coordination • 115 a. OFFEROR shall provide a minimum of one qualified Senior Resident Engineer and other qualified Resident Engineers, as needed to effectively manage the Project. b. OFFEROR Resident Engineer shall act as a prime point of contact between Contractor, COMMISSION, OFFEROR's construction surveyor, OFFEROR's materials inspector, and utility companies. OFFEROR may, when requested by COMMISSION, act as point of contact between design engineers, cities, and the public. c. OFFEROR shall maintain regular contact with COMMISSION's Construction Manager. d. OFFEROR shall coordinate utility relocations with utility companies and their designees, as well as the utility inspector. e. OFFEROR shall review Project plans and special provisions for possible errors and deficiencies prior to construction of any specific element and report such findings to COMMISSION. Should COMMISSION determine that changes are necessary, OFFEROR shall assist in implementation and processing of change orders in accordance with contract documents. f. OFFEROR shall provide all required monitoring, coordination, and tracking of construction progress to ensure the Project proceeds on schedule and according to the order of work in the plans and special provisions. OFFEROR shall expedite work, as required, to maintain schedule in conjunction with the overall construction staging program. g. OFFEROR shall coordinate review of shop drawings and Requests for Information (RFI) with the Construction Manager. OFFEROR shall log and track all submittals and requests. h. OFFEROR shall provide a qualified SWPPP coordinator who shall review contractor prepared Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and coordinate approval with COMMISSION. OFFEROR shall cooperate with monitoring agency inspections and field reviews. i. OFFEROR shall coordinate the implementation of any changes with the Construction Manager and the design engineer. j. OFFEROR shall review and approve falsework and shoring plans. k. OFFEROR shall review and approve Traffic Control Plans and forward to COMMISSION to get City approval as necessary. I. OFFEROR shall coordinate all Project construction activities with other on- 116 going projects within and adjacent to the Project limits. 5. Construction Inspection a. OFFEROR shall coordinate all required inspections necessary for the Project. OFFEROR shall ensure that appropriate City, and local agency are notified and present as required throughout the Project. OFFEROR shall notify COMMISSION immediately regarding any directives, recommendations, notices, etc. received from agencies other than COMMISSION. b. OFFEROR shall perform and document daily on -site inspections of the progress and quality of construction to determine if the work being performed is in general conformance with the contract documents, all applicable laws, codes, and ordinances. c. OFFEROR shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to discover and promptly report to COMMISSION any and all defects or deficiencies in the materials or workmanship used in the Project. d. OFFEROR personnel assigned to the Project shall be thoroughly familiar with Caltrans Standard Specifications, Caltrans Standard Plans, and Caltrans Erosion Control and Highway Planting requirements. OFFEROR personnel shall have the ability to read and interpret construction plans and specifications. OFFEROR personnel shall also have knowledge of State of California Construction Safety Orders (CaIOSHA) and traffic control practices as specified in the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH). In addition, OFFEROR personnel shall be familiar with the construction requirements of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program. e. Assignments to be performed by OFFEROR personnel shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) Paving and subgrade inspection, structures and foundation inspection, signing and striping inspection, quantity calculations, checking grade and alignment, construction traffic control, and duties that may be required to determine that construction of the Project is being performed in accordance with the contract documents. 2) Identifying actual and potential problems associated with the Project and recommending sound engineering solutions. 3) Subgrade inspection, hardscape inspection, trenching & irrigation inspection, quantity calculations, checking grade and alignment, sub -surface & finish surface drainage inspection, soil amendments 117 and plant material identification & quality control, along with other duties that may be required to determine that construction of the Project is being performed in accordance with the contract documents. 4) Arrange testing in accordance with Ca!trans highway planting procedures. 5) Maintaining awareness of safety and health requirements. Monitoring Contractors' compliance with applicable regulations and construction contract provisions for the protection of the public and Project personnel. 6) Preparing complete and accurate daily reports, calculations, project records, payment quantity documents, reports, and correspondence related to Project activities. Documents shall be sufficient to provide actual cost of force account work. 7) Preparing construction sketches, drawings, and cross -sections, as necessary. 8) Keep records of all deviations from the approved plans to assist the Design Engineer in the preparation of as -built plans. 9) Providing inspections for environmental compliance. 10)Maintaining awareness of water discharge requirements. Monitoring Contractors' compliance with applicable regulations and construction contract provisions. 11)Monitoring Contractors' compliance with applicable regulations required by AQMD. 12)0ther duties as may be required or reasonably requested. 6. Project Support a. Construction Surveys OFFEROR shall perform construction surveying services, field calculations; and home office calculations to support construction of the projects. OFFEROR may be requested to review available survey data, construction plans, and right-of-way plans to confirm compatibility and to identify discrepancies prior to and during construction of proposed projects. The Resident Engineer will assign survey work to the CONSUTLTANT by issuing a "Request for Survey Services". Requests 118 may include, but not be limited to, the following types of surveys and related services: 1) Construction Surveys OFFEROR shall assist the Resident Engineer in all phases of construction staking and calculations as needed. Survey calculations and adjustments shall be performed with established and computed coordinates based on the California Coordinate System. Cross-section data collection shall be performed by conventional and terrain line interpolation survey methods. Survey data will include topography, cross-section, and other survey data in computer formats compatible with the Ca!trans computer survey and design systems. Prepare and maintain survey documents. Survey documents include survey field notes, maps, drawings, and other survey documents. Perform construction staking, including but not limited to: • • • .• • • • Utility locations Clearing limits Slope staking Storm drain, sanitary sewer, and irrigation systems Drainage structures Curbs, gutters, and sidewalk Horizontal and vertical control for structures and portions of structures (bents, abutments, wingwalls, etc.) Rough grade Finish grade Monitor for settlement, if required Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) equipment shall be made available if required by the COMMISSION 2) Right of Way Lines Existing right of way will be established from Local Agency's record information and existing monumentation. • • 119 • • Right of way monumentation shall be renewed and restored in accordance with Section 10.4 of the Ca!trans "Survey Manual" and the State of California Land Surveyor's Act • Comer records and records of surveys shall be prepared and filed in accordance with the applicable standards and the State of California Land Surveyor's Act. • Perpetuate existing monumentation. Includes restoring, renewing, referencing, and resetting existing boundary related monumentation. In addition, stake areas where construction disturbs the existing right of way, preparing and filing required maps and records. • Right of Way Surveys. Includes research and preparation filing of required maps and records. In addition, locate and set monuments for right or way and staking for right of way fences. • Final monumentation. Includes setting of centerline points of control upon completion of construction. 3) Special Design — Data Surveys Includes drainage, utility, and surveys required for special field studies. b. Materials Testing and Geotechnical Services OFFEROR will provide experienced personnel, equipment, and facilities to perform various construction materials sampling and testing. Laboratory and field materials testing will be used to ensure that structure and roadway construction work conforms to California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) standards, specifications, and special provisions for material quality and workmanship. All field and laboratory testing is to be performed in accordance with California Test Methods. OFFEROR will be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of all test data compilation and results. c. Public Relations OFFEROR shall retain a public relations firm to implement a public outreach program for the project. OFFEROR shall coordinate public awareness for the project with COMMISSION in conjunction with the local agencies. The OFFEROR will manage all public awareness activities for this project. OFFEROR's public 120 relations firm will be responsible for but not limited to the following outreach activities: • Attend construction meetings • Dissemination of traffic advisories • Respond to public inquiries/calls • Organize ground breaking and ribbon cutting ceremonies • Develop and maintain project information on the Commission's website d. Permits OFFEROR shall review the project for permit compliance and coordinate with COMMISSION and the design engineer to ensure that necessary permits are obtained. OFFEROR shall assist COMMISSION in the coordination, timely processing and verification of approval for all permits. OFFEROR shall maintain permits and permit documentation on site. 7. Cost and Schedule a. OFFEROR shall monitor and track the following: 1. Contract pay item quantities and payments 2. Contract change orders 3. Supplemental work items 4. Agency furnished materials 5. Anticipated extra work balance 6. Contingency balance 7. Project budget b. OFFEROR shall review and monitor Contractor's schedule and inform COMMISSION of any significant changes or deviations in the schedule. c. OFFEROR shall provide and maintain a Project staffing plan of field office personnel. In cooperation with COMMISSION, the staffing plan shall be periodically updated to reflect Project progress and needs. 8. Contract Change Orders and Claims a. OFFEROR shall receive and evaluate requests for changes, and/or substitutions by the Contractor. Contract Change Orders submitted to COMMISSION shall be accompanied by OFFEROR recommendations. Where applicable, OFFEROR shall convey proposed changes to design engineer, or other project Offerors. If the requested changes are accepted, OFFEROR shall negotiate and prepare appropriate Contract Change Orders. • • 121 b. OFFEROR shall attempt to avoid all unnecessary Contract Change Orders. When a Contract Change Order is necessary, OFFEROR shall consult with COMMISSION prior to its preparation. Unless directed otherwise by COMMISSION, the preferred method of payment for Contract Change Orders should be as follows: 1) Agreed Price 2) Adjustment in compensation to a bid item 3) Time and materials or Force Account c. OFFEROR shall attempt to identify all potential claims, track and monitor unresolved claims, and implement claims avoidance processes. d. OFFEROR shall assist COMMISSION, as requested, in the identification, resolution, and final disposition of claims filed by the Contractor or third parties against COMMISSION or the Project. 9. Safety In addition to the requirements specified elsewhere in this contract, the following shall also apply: a. OFFEROR shall implement and conduct a comprehensive safety program including regular tail -gate safety meetings for OFFEROR personnel. OFFEROR shall provide monthly OFFEROR status of safety reports. b. OFFEROR shall comply with State of California Construction Safety Orders and provisions of the Ca!trans Construction Manual. c. OFFEROR shall provide appropriate safety training for all OFFEROR field personnel. d. OFFEROR shall provide all necessary safety equipment as required for OFFEROR personnel. 10. Project Close Out a. OFEROR shall prepare a list of items to be completed and/or corrected by the Contractor for final completion of the Project. b OFFEROR shall collect and furnish as -built information to the design engineer for preparation of as -built drawings including pre -stress drawings and pile logs, as applicable. c. OFFEROR shall review and verify completeness of as -built drawings. 122 d. OFFEROR shall conduct a final walk-through with COMMISSION, Local Agencies, Contractors, and design engineers. e. OFFEROR shall prepare final construction reports including the Project Completion Report. f. OFFEROR shall prepare and deliver to COMMISSION all project files. g. OFFEROR shall assist COMMISSION and Contractor in obtaining final release of all project permits. DELIVERABLES 1. Inspector daily reports, extra work diaries and Resident Engineers' daily diaries. 2_ Monthly Project Activity Summary Reports. 3. Monthly Contractor progress payments, back-up documentation, and Contractor payment records. 4. Contractor final payment documents, delivered to COMMISSION no later than ten (10) working days after acceptance by COMMISSION of the completed construction projects. 5. Project Completion Report. 6. All project files, project reports, correspondence, memoranda, shop drawings, project logs, change order data, claims and claim reports, and Contractor payment records. 7. Certified payrolls and fringe benefit statements for all employees, OFFEROR and Contractor, who are subject to the State and/or Federal prevailing wage rates. 8. All material test results will be provided in accordance with the applicable Standard Specifications and Special Provisions, and test methods. Failing tests will be immediately reported to the Resident Engineer or Structures Representative. All test results will be recorded on the appropriate forms. The test documents will be legible and show the identity of the tester where appropriate. A notebook containing all results will be kept. 9. Unless otherwise specified in the survey request, the deliverables shall conform to the following: a. Survey points, lines, and monuments shall be established, marked, identified, and referenced as required by survey request and requirements herein. • 123 • b. Survey notes, drawings, calculations, and other survey documents and information shall be completed as required by the survey request and the requirements herein. c. All original survey documents resulting from this contract, including original field notes, adjustment calculations, final results, and appropriate intermediate documents, shall be delivered to the Resident Engineer and shall become the property of COMMISSION. A copy of all survey documents furnished by COMMISSION shall be retained by OFFEROR for future reference. When the survey is performed with a total station survey system, the original field notes shall be a hard copy in a readable format of the data (observations) as originally collected and submitted by the survey party. The hard copy shall be signed by the Party Chief. If the Party Chief is not licensed, the person in "responsible charge" will be required to sign. d. Deliverables to the Resident Engineer shall follow the format specified below: • Horizontal Control • Alpha numeric hard copy point listing with adjusted California Coordinate System northing and eastings and the appropriate descriptions. • Vertical Control • Alpha numeric hard copy benchmark listing with adjusted elevations compatible with the design datum. • Topography • Alpha numeric hard copy listing, hard copy drawing, and computer aided drawing and design (CADD) digital drawing. The CADD drawing shall be compatible with the systems utilized by Caltrans. Data collection method used to collect cross-section data and the coding (feature description) of terrain data for cross -sections shall conform to the survey request requirements. Deliverables shall depend on the data collection method as follows: • Conventional Cross — Sections (each cross — section): For each cross - section and alpha numeric listing, a hard copy drawing, and a computer formatted file compatible with the systems utilized by Caltrans. • Terrain Line Interpolation Cross — Section Data (each terrain line interpolation survey): Terrain line interpolation cross — sections shall include an alpha numeric listing, a hard copy plan view drawing of the terrain lines, and 124 a computer input file. The computer .input file shall be provided in a format compatible with the systems utilized by Ca[trans. e. Data Collector Data If specified in the survey request, the raw data from the data collector shall be provided in a format conforming to the survey request requirements f. Other As specified in the survey request. Equipment and Materials to be provided by Offeror 1. OFFEROR will provide office space, telephones, desks, chairs, computers, and appropriate office equipment. One (1) office with a desk, chair, telephone, and computer will be reserved for the COMMISSION. 2. OFFEROR shall provide all necessary equipment including software, materials, supplies, miscellaneous tools, and safety equipment required for its personnel to perform the services accurately, efficiently, and safely. Only those items listed in Attachment B, OFFEROR Cost Proposal, shall be reimbursed by COMMISSION. 2. OFFEROR personnel shall be provided with vehicles suitable for the location and nature of the work involved. Vehicles shall be equipped with flashing yellow lights, either permanently or temporarily affixed. 3. OFFEROR personnel shall be provided with a mobile radio, cellular phone, or other means to assure full-time communication. If a radio system is to be used, OFFEROR shall provide a base station at the field office. 4. OFFEROR personnel shall be provided, with all applicable standard plans, specifications, and other standards as appropriate (see item G below). 5. For Materials Testing, OFFEROR and its staff will be fully equipped at all times to perform the services required, including but not limited to the following: a. An on -site mobile laboratory or laboratory in close proximity to the project will be required. The type and location of the lab should be such that it can meet the needs of the project in an efficient, time effective manner. The laboratory is to be fully staffed, equipped, and supplied to conduct all required soils, materials, and concrete breaking tests in a timely manner. • • 125 • b. OFFEROR's personnel will be provided with radios, mobile phones, or other means to assure full-time communication. OFFEROR vehicles will have flashing lights, visible from the rear, with a driver control switch. Vans without side windows will not be used. COMMISSION furnished magnetic logos will be affixed to each side of the vehicle at all times the vehicle is being used for the work under this contract. Each vehicle is to be fully contained with all necessary equipment and supplies necessary to perform the field sampling and tests required. c. Field personnel will be provided with all necessary safety equipment to permit work to be performed safely and efficiently within operating highway and construction zone environments. d. All equipment to be calibrated as per Section 3-10 and 3-11 of Caltrans' Quality Assurance Program Manual. 6. For construction surveying, OFFEROR and staff shall have adequate equipment and supplies to complete the required survey work. Equipment and supplies shall, include, but not be limited to: a. Survey vehicles Survey vehicles will be suitable to perform the required work in varying terrain and conditions encountered on the project. Vehicles shall be fully equipped with all necessary tools, instruments, supplies, and safety equipment required to perform the work accurately, efficiently, and safely. Vehicles shall be equipped with a flashing yellow beacon light. b. Data Processing Systems Data processing systems shall include hardware and software to: • Performing survey and staking calculations from the design plans and specifications; • Reduce survey data collected with conventional and total station survey systems; • Perform network adjustments for horizontal and vertical control surveys; • Format survey data to be compatible with the Caltrans computer survey and data system. c. Drafting equipment and supplies. d. Digital calculators. e. Hand tools as appropriate for the requested survey work. 126 f. Traffic cones (minimum 25). Traffic cones shall be 28 inches in height (minimum). g. Traffic control devices as required to perform the requested_ survey work. Traffic control devices include signs, sign bases, flags, and hand held signs. h. Leveling instruments and equipment: • Self -leveling level. Precision: standard deviation in one mile of double run leveling 0.005 feet or less. • Suitable level rods for the work to be performed. i. Distance measuring instruments and equipment: • Electronic distance measurer (EDM). Precision: standard deviation 3 mm plus 3 PPM, or less; Range: Minimum one mile under average atmospheric conditions. • Prisms, sufficient to perform the required work. • Tapes; steel, cloth. Angle measuring instruments and equipment: • Theodolite for non -control surveys; Precision: direct circle reading to three seconds, or equivalent, horizontal and vertical. • Targets as required to perform the work. k. VVhen required for efficient survey operations, total station survey systems consisting of an electronic angle measuring instrument, EDM, and electronic data collector shall be provided. The angle measuring instruments and EDM shall conform to the requirements for the equipment previously listed. I. Radio or cellular communications equipment for communication between field office and field crews. Caltrans manuals, standards, forms, and other policies and procedures to be followed to perform the required work. Materials to be Furnished by Commission 1. COMMISSION will provide copies of all Project construction documents including plans, special provisions, reports, designer prepared resident engineer files, and contracts. 2. COMMISSION will provide copies of all previously secured permits and Project authorizations. • 127 i 3. Appropriate forms for recording test data in accordance with Caltrans practices and procedures outlined in the "Manual of Test". 4. Magnetic COMMISSION logos to be affixed to OFFEROR vehicles. Standards All construction inspection, surveys, materials sampling and testing, and contract administration shall be in accordance with the Project bid documents, special provisions, plans, and current Caltrans Manuals including: 1. Construction Manual and its revisions 2. Bridge Construction Records and Procedures Manual 3. Quality Assurance Program Manual 4. Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones 5. Caltrans Standard Specifications and Standard Plans 6. Caltrans Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Water Pollution Control Program (WPCP) Preparation Manual 7. Manual of Test (3 volumes) 8. Survey Manual 9. District 8 Standard Staking Procedures Manual Work not covered by the manuals shall be performed in accordance with accepted professional standards. Surveys performed by OFFEROR shall conform to the requirements of the Land Surveyor's Act. In accordance with the Land Surveyor's Act, "responsible charge" for the work shall reside with the Licensed Land Surveyor or a pre -January 1, 1982, Registered Professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. Unless otherwise specified in the survey request, control surveys shall conform to second order (modified) accuracy standards as specified in the Caltrans "Survey Manual". Additional standards for specific survey work may be included in the applicable request for survey. Such standards supplement the standards specified herein. If 128 • • or from the Contractor to perform services or work outside the terms of any executed contracts for this Project. Third Party Relationships This Contract is intended to provide unique services for a specific project. In the development of the Project, COMMISSION has worked closely with various professional Offerors, agencies, and others in the preparation of the construction documents and other Project related materials. COMMISSION, however, is solely responsible for and will be the sole point of contact for all contractual matters related to the Project. OFFEROR shall take direction only from COMMISSION and shall regularly inform only COMMISSION of Project progress, outstanding issues, and all Project related matters. During the course of the Project, OFFEROR may find occasion to meet with City or County representatives, the design engineer, Project Offerors, or other third parties who have assisted with the Project. These entities may, from time to time, offer suggestions and/or recommendations regarding the Project or elements of the Project. While COMMISSION enjoys a close relationship with and has considerable confidence in the capabilities of these other parties, OFFEROR shall not act on any suggestions, solicited or unsolicited, without obtaining specific direction from COMMISSION. All oral and written communication with outside agencies or Offerors related to the project shall be directed only to COMMISSION. Distribution of Project related communication and information shall be at the sole discretion of COMMISSION representatives. Construction Site Safety In addition to the requirements specified elsewhere in this contract, the following also will apply. 1. OFFEROR will conform to the safety provisions of the Ca!trans Construction Manual. 2. OFFEROR's field personnel will wear white hard hats with proper suspension, orange vests with reflective tape, sleeved shirt, long pants, and leather boots with ankle support and rubber soled shoes at all times while working in the field. 3. OFFEROR will provide appropriate safety training for all OFFEROR's personnel. 4. All safety equipment will be provided by OFFEROR. Basis for Survey and Monument Staking 130 COMMISSION will designate the existing horizontal and vertical control monuments that are the basis of OFFEROR performed surveys. COMMISSION will provide the California Coordinate System values and/or elevation values for these monuments. OFFEROR shall adjust OFFEROR performed surveys to be the designated control monuments and the values. Monuments established by OFFEROR shall be marked by OFFEROR with furnished disks, plugs, tags. In addition, OFFEROR shall identify OFFEROR established monuments by tagging or stamping the monuments with the license or registration number of OFFEROR'S surveyor who is in "responsible charge" of the work. Personnel Qualifications and Responsibilities The quantity and qualifications of field personnel to be assigned will be determined by the scope of the Project and the degree of difficulty of required tasks to be performed. All personnel and personnel assignments shall be subject to approval by COMMISSION. • • 131 • • RCTC RIV-215 Widening Project Southstar Engineering & Consulting Inc. Tasks will be performed by Combination of staffing Does not include Overtime Monthly Cost Chart Resources per Schedule 19-Months Contractor Schedule Primary field staff usage in Red Preconsbuction Bidding Process Stage 1 stage 2 Premnairoc8wl Personnel Primary Role Loaded Nate Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 041.10 . Nov.10 • . Dee-10 Jao-il Feb-11 Mar-11, Apr-11. - May-11 Jun-11 :" '" JuHt (wg ll Seyll Oct-11 Nov-11 "Dec-Il Jan-12 . Bryce Johnston, PE RE/PM 5 197,00 S 15260.00 S 6,39100 5 3,940.00 5 7,1380.00 5 7.880.00 5 7,850.00 Amr Ahualhassan, PE Office 5 185.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 5,920.00 $ 3,700.00 5 3.700.00 5 720050 5 7,400.00 Jose Corona, PE Suoclures Lead S 185m S - S - $ - 5 1050.00 5 - 5 2,960.00 Daniel Claccela, PE OCOA 5 197.00 $ - $ - $ - S - S 3,940.00 5 3.940.00 Stage 1 Field Inspeel ari and Office " " 80/00 Jcrostpn, PE RUM 5 19700 5 27.580.00 S 27,550.00 $ 27,580.00 NM NauNNssan, PE OHCe $ 1e5.00 $ 28.120.00 $ 28,120m S 29,600.50 Jose Corona. PE Stnx'Axes Lead $ 185.00 Y - 5 - S 2400.00 Nick Turner Field ReadwilY $ 126.02 $ - 5 19,215.88 $ 20222.24 $ S S Ray Tortes FIMd RoaleINSIkc[rical S 119.7S $ - 16.20265 $ 19,515.51 Tommy Reese TMIIidSalelylSWPPP 3 S - 5 IB20265 $ 160.69 $ 18,057.18 Mae Bmadweler, CPESC SWPPOCOA lead S 20123 S - 5 - $ 8,768.00 Daniel CneMBOa PE OCOA S 19730 197.00 3 780.00 5 780.00 Y ]B4W 5150e2 Feld Inspection and OtEme ..' .-.`.r ,. _ _ •• ._. .. Bryce Johnston. PE RE/PM $ 19700 $ 27560.00 $ 27080.00 $ 22.580.00 S 27.550.00 $ 27,580.00 $ 27,580.00 $ 27.580.013 $ 22580.00 $ 27580.00 $ 27,580.00 5 2900800 NM NM AdrePassan, PE OI§ce $ 185.00 s 29,600.00 $ 29.600A0 S 29,50000 5 29,600.00 E 29.600.00 S 29,800.00 S 29,000.00 S 28,12000 $ 26.120.00 Nick Turner Field Roadway $ 126.42 $ 21238.80 $ 20,22724 $ 20,22724 3 20.227.24 $ 20.22724 5 20,22224 S 2022724 $ 19,215A8 5 19,215,98 S 21251_55 i 21238.60 5 23.48836 Sam A4len Meld Roadway 5 139151 S 23.488.56 S 22,370.05 E 22,370.55 3 22,370.06 E 22270.05 S 22.370.055 3 22,370.05 $ 21,251.55 Ray TOaeb Field 1908dwey/E13CMCII S 151.97 5 20,491.29 5 19,616.61 i 19,61651 5 19,616-61 3 19,51551 S 19,515.51 $ 19,516.51 $ 18039.74 E 15539.74 $ 20,49129 Tommy Reese TrelfidSafeli9$WPPP S 119.75 5 2o,wa.72 s /2,160.69 $ 16,160.69 3 12,16059 $ 19.160.69 $ 19,160-69 S 19.16069 $ 1620255 S 18,202-65 S 20,11822 MNB BroaOxakLCPESC SWPPP Lead 5 20123 S 201215 5 2,417.15 $ 2,417.15 $ 2,417.15 $ 2417.15 $ 2,417.15 5 2,417.15 S 2417.15 5 2,417-15 $ 2,417.15 Daniel Caoctele. PE OCOA S 197.00 $ 760.00 i 786.00 E 786.00 5 786.00 $ 761100 $ 758.00 S 788.00 $ 758.00 S 788m S 288m Stage 2 Kane§ Widon019' •••.. .. ...: _.' "15300 .. -.., .: .r.e.F .ten r-:: -.. � '�:: - .. - .. � e ,i. -s.�.. C d '1. -.?. _ _ •t'--'iID. ,- , .. ..,0 ., � ..0 s •. - . JoseCorona SbuClures Lead 5 $ 1460.00 5 740A0 $ 740Ao 5 740.00""5 740.00:• S 22287 5 22257 $ 74040 00 S 74USU 3 s - Moo PE Technical Advisor g $ 402359 5 3222<7 $ 5 3222Jn $ 322i8] S 2,686.90 5 3,22267 5 $ ZA17.69 417.15 $ ZAI3.89 $ - wArmFranco, NaDAm1 n Swciures Inspection 64.21 5 164.21 $ - $ Z]$88.80 7,22287 $ 21,506.90 E 27,588.80 $ 3758630 $ 27,686.80 $ 22,510.W 5,763,89 S 15,]6339 5 15,76359 $ 15,76a.59 S - Sa9eifieMAapw" 4ror lfr"' ". "-. ..': .. :,: :.. _ .:. :.:: •r, :>:: >r n.. :3>.: . . ... . >. . _y_,. '_c . ...... .... ., .. - .-. .. .. , _. -....r .-. ... . BryceJohnston, PE RE/PM $ [9]00 Amr NveMassan. PE Office $ 185.00 Nick Tumer Fi640 Roadway $ 12642 San MUM new Roadway $ 139.81 Ray Tortes Fall Roadway/Mortal S 121517 Tarry Reese TMIfMJSaletylSWPPP $ 11925 Sake Broadwater, CPESC SWPPP Lead S 20497 Daliea Clecc etle. PE OCOA 5 197.00 n... r Y34,,,Z.6101,Fr^s1...:k7. >- ._:.. <t n.9E:-.`,cY. .dSOg,:k 2c.w.'dl^%'. .-._ .... .a s.:: ilh r,>-rl`.:o:;S-<J .•. -, ., -. Bryce Johnston. PE RE/PM 5 197-06 " Amt Agrelhassan, PE 011ice $ I135A0 Jose CorwR, PE SaucMe_s CMseoul $ 18500 Daniell Ciacchelle. PE OCOA S 19700 tl9 Meteriala Te6U b5 gages- .. ., ... ,. _ . .; . _.: . _•.: .,. - _ xi r , x"}. • x F'• •, :z ,. .... a a-,.::, "$ ri ,« _ ': :-s. .. . .,: ._ -„ i 'sue :e.... `! _ ., . , -. - - x ,i, � OnelecAbu@nce Man $ 135A6 $ 541.91 $ 2.70939 i 5,419.06 $,tl8-06" $ 8,128.93 8,12859 $ 0.129.59 $ 8,120.59 § 5,128.59 $ 5,12859 $ 5,12839 5 5,128.69 $ 8,128.58 S 8r12a59 Pao! o156 DB CA § 123A5 S - 5 - 5 - $ - . - 5 - S $ $ - $ - S - 3 - S - 5 - $ - $ Rick Howl Rick Howland islan1 Maj. CIA Man. 13563 $ - $ 2,]ISS] 5 - $ - 5 - S - - 5 54331 3 54331 $ - $ - $ 54351 5 50.1A1 $ 543.91 Rob Ryan Technic Technical Advisor $ 5 $ - 5 - 3 - - 5 - E 2A83.08 5 - E - $ E - S - 3 - S - $ - S - 5 ends Stein TechncM $ 14144 141.14 $ - $ - i - $ - i - $ i - 5 - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5 - S - MMus Project Mana98r nager 110_11 $ 083.20 $ 96629 5 - 5" - S %6.29 S - $ 809.04 $ 80959 S - S - 5 - S 809.04 5 866a9 $ 86659 Kenn thM95 Kenneth ManteM Field Technician $ 1f011 f - S - 3 4,404.52 11311.22 S 1137122 $ 837122 S BBW-04 $ 6.371.22 $ E 8371.22 5 $ $ 6,809.04 Leonardo BanaMare FIOM Teclmi,yan $ 102.32 $ $ - i - 5,16561 $ 8,16561 5 9.18551 $ $ 16,371-22 $ S 16,37122 5 16.37122 5 ?Z $ 56,3]l22 6,37122 E 16,3T22 S 16,3]122 5,657-65 5 1555235 5,552.66 5 13,552.65 37122 $ 1fi,3]I2P Surt'ey99115ages .-•,:•: � •,.�',... .... - ..5 , -:' � .. _ ... .'.:.�.-,'vT .s. .'.: .. ,.v - ..r . ..4 a:{ .. Aw,.^'-�� P v69249 .i ._ i,': - a-Y]897.7.49'.TW 5 1,697A9 5. �.09 ma Survey Manager $ $ 23T1.86 $ 5 1JiTA9'. 28949 i 1,897.93 $ 1,89249 $ 1,697A9 9Y• 5 189TA9 $ 5 $ 1,B9].09 E uwonCIN Union Pall C0161 13661 $ 13581 5 - 0,897.97 $ 19,605..92 S $ 5 9157.19 $ 1916211 S - 5 - 9157.19 $ 19167.11 9157.19 $ 1915211 5 - 9157.19 $ 19162.11 13 $ 13687A9 71 5 i368i.66 Union insbume $ 14459 $ - 5 9,606.92 5 "- 121 961164 19b13a4 5 17,16211 S - 5 - $. t7,047.0 17,16211 $ - $ 17007.00 56.65 5 12256.66 $ 5 1225a.65 Union Mice 3 16456 $ - $ - E - - $ $ 9,676.51 $ ],676,51 S - $ - $ ].67651 $ $ 7,676.51 S - $ 7676.61- DniOn Proje Assists Rgehel AsSisMM $ 81.56 $ - 5 - $ 5 676.51 $ 6]651 $ - $ - i 67631 S bTGSI § - $ 676.51 $ 6I8.51 5 62651 PilbfcAWreach'ai.Stegesr :.., .,.. ., .. .. Wit"=-":.?"r . $.. r l.- • ..1:. r r �i.T.s'. `e,{='�y2"!� .3:".:': v .. --:... - , ':.. t .r:"�R• Wb. ..t t.J v -'::an Cheryl Donahue Outreach Manger 5 10552 1,2b.71 $ 1240.16 S 5 1,264.90 S 1.264.90 5 1244.90 1264.90 $ 1,24418 $ 1,054.06 $ 1,05520 E 1,64326 5 1,94326 $ 164326 5 1,843.26 S 1R526 5 184326 5 843.26 § 933.12 Elsa A.gorMn Outreach Specials! $ 185"41 $ 1,(15.71 $ 14]5.]1 4,216.32 1,616.90 S 1614.90 $ 135 251 $ 135 51 $ 5 1;26431. 5 1,35251 S 1,35251 5 35251 5 35251 5 35251 S 352.51 5 34326 3 5 35251 Mei68 Holguin Outreach Specials! $ 8613 $ - $ 5 $ 3,6 763 $ 3AT1.63 S 616.90 $ j 616.91 E 35231 $ 35251 S 95251 $ 35251 $ 35231 5 35331 5 35231 $ 35231 S 3R.51 $ 352,51 $ 35251 5 a5251 35226 $ 352.51 $ 35251 Malelias 740114 per cost Test :.. .. •yFi' .. ^2 s;-: ,c.:F "$ t:d59 ,:.,ty ::t Y -. -..*. .. .:: Y -" ,;z• , t-, >.;_i ,.:;,. $ 30.560.00 $ 14,943.87 $ 10,359.87 $ 24,012-27 $ 22,345.95 $ 26,331.05 $ 68,113.93 $ 155,968.39 160,605.45 $ 269,923.13 $ 257,621.51 $ 212,132.02 $ 212,675.33 $ 255,751.75" $ 255,208.44 $ 198,536.99 $ 237,727.28 S 219,681.25 $ 211,186.12 $ 79,876.02 $ 48,677.01 S 384,687.77 $ RCTC RIV-215 Widening Project Southstar Engineering & Consulting Inc. Tasks will be performed by combination of staffing Does not include Overtime Primary field staff usage in Red Preoonstruotion Personnel Bryce Johnston. PE Amr Abuelhassan, PE Jose Corona, PE Daniel Ciaccnella, PE Slane 1 F1eW Inspec on and Office Bryce Johnston. PE 4mr Almelhassan. PE Jose Corona. PE Nick Turner Ray Tones Tommy Reese Mike Breadwaler, GPEBCi Daniel Claccnella, PE Stage 2 Field Inspection and Office Bryce Johnston. PE Amr Abuethassan, PE Hick Tumor Sam A®no Ray Tones Tommy Reese Mike Broadwaler. CPESC Daniel Ciaochela. PE a Corona Doug Franco, PE Neill Aso Bryce Johnston, PE Amr AbueNassan. PE Nick Tuner Sam Albino Ray Torres Tammy Reese M9ne Broatlwater• CPE.% DaMMa CacchelM, PE Prefect Close Out::,. Bryce Johnston PE Amr Abuelassxn, PE Jose Cana. PE Danielaffiatc ela, PE Mateda sT Chris Gerber Pall SWls Rick Howland ROD Ryan Boris Sinn Lines Valais Kenneth Mancebo Leonardo SantaMada 50rYeya all Stagea/ lit Simernal Union Union Union Unim Public Oimeadl altSlages Cheryl Donahue Elsa Angmhanh Melissa Holguin Materials Testing perCoa'Test r• Stage Posl Construction Totals per StaN Primary Role Loaded Hate - Pob12 Mar-12 Apr-12 • May-12 " Jun-12 - Ju142 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nev-12 1 Firm Totals By Firm .l, RE/PM $ 197.00 $ 49.644.00 Sau061er $ 1.917.485.53 Office $ 16500 E 42,920.00 Soullstar Shoctures Lead S 183.00 E 4,810.00 EwNstar OCDA 8 197.007. $ J,880.00 SOut16[ar $ $ - _ RE/PM $ 197.00 $ 82.74000 SoulDslar Office $ 185.00 $ e0.00 Souhstar Structures Lead S 185.00 7.400.00 3oulnsW Field Roadway S 126.42 $ 39.443.12 HDR CCC 5 600,505%I Fs:W Roadway/Electrical EndcN 5 1'2197 $ 37,363.34 Southslar Traffic/Safety/SWPPP S $ 38,057.18 SWPPP Leatl Lead S '!OL33 01.-13 $ ValiGa! Va9thslar $ 296,83&m OCOA 5 Im.W 2,354.00 $ 2,364.00 SgMlslar RE/PM $ 197.00 5 27,580.00 5 27,580.00 $ 330,960.00 Sau9utar Office S 185.0D S 28.12000 S 18,500.00 5 339.66000 Sou86ar Field Roadway $ 126.42 $ 19,215.88 5 12,642.02 $ 234,130.30 HDR CCC Field Roadway $ 139.81 $ 21251.55 5 - $ 244952.09 HDR CCC FEW Roadway/Electrical S 121.97 $ 18.539.74 5 - $ 213,694.87 Sau86Mr TratlhJSalely/SWPPP S 110.75 S 18.20265 5 19.16009 E 228.970.20 Sou116tar SWPPP Lead 5 N1.43 3 2,417.15 $ 2,417.15 3 29,005.86 Vol Cooper OCOA S 197.00 E 7138.00 S 768.00 E 9,456.60 SouMsfar $ 3 f - � , - _ Structures Lead S t85.00 i - 3 I400.00 $ 9.62000 $Oulhehf Technical Advisor S 201L1.1 5 - 5 3,222.87 3 33.840.17 Val Copper Sinwlunas Inspection $ 164.21 3 - S 1284.14 $ 216,096.61 Vas Cooper _. .. .. •.. • .. . RE/PM S 197.00 5 31,52000 S nse040 S 27,580.00 $ '2164000 5,,.. $ i i $ 110.32000 SoutlSlar Office $ 185.00 $ 29600.00 $ 25,900.00 $ 25,900.00 $ 22,200A0 $ - S - $ - $ - $ 1031330 Southstar Sousrer Field Roadway $ 126.42 $ 20,22724 S 2022724 $ 20,22721 $-10,11162 3 - 3 - $ - 5 - $ 70.795.34 HDR CCC Fcefd RoedweY $ 139.81 S 11,185.03 $ - 3 - S -•E - 5 - $ - $ - $ 11.185.03 HDR CCC Reid Roadway/Electrical 5 121.97 5 21,954.95 $ 21,954.95 f-12,19720 $ 2,434N 5 19.61551 5 9,757.76 L - $ - $ 87,819.81 Soutnstar TI88r/Safely/SWPPP 5 119.75 3 21,555.77 3 2,395A9 3 2,395.09 $ 2,395.09 $ 19,160.69 $ 9540 54 S - S - S 57.482.06 Sootnetar SWPPP Lad S 20.97 $ • 3,27909 3 3,279.59 $ 1,639.60 $ - • 1,539.80 3 $ - $ - $ - 3 9,838.78 Val Cooper OCOA S 197.00 $ 788.00 $ 708.00 $ 788.00 $ ' 788110 S - 5 8 - S - $ 115200 Southstar y i $ S _ �:.�. •: t.:.ti: � � 1 Y' Y:1,..-4.:' r --„ a , .ry x. "...ante 3,K. � .':=Pwr Yir=:,i _ : � P - e:S>kr_.".:N+i.TI 1 RE/PM $ 197.00 3 7,880,00 $ 7.880.00 5 7,880.00 3 1,970.00 3 25610.00 seism& Office $ 18s.00 3 7,400.00 5 7,400.00 3 7,400.00 E 3,700.00 i 25.900.00 SduthStar Structures Closeout $ 185.00 5 1,480.00 3 meow 3 1,4ame0 $ 1,480.00 $ 5.920.00 Swdlutar OCOA $ 197.00 $ 1.576.00 i 1 576.00 i t 576.00 S 1.576.00 S 6.304.00 SOUth3tar _ s z 'c-, n h .:>:. .. , ing . , ..35 a3 Man $ 48 $ 8128 $ 677582 S 6.77382 $ 2,7p8S3 S 2703.53 S t 2TD9S9 $ 175,10022 Twining 5.2. ,668 GeotAssurance ect Engineer $ 123. 8 Twain Assistant CIA .83 3 543.31 $ $43.31 $ 543.31 1 $ - ,6. o TeChnical Advisor $ 260.39 $ $ $ $ 708300 $ 4,166.16 Oohing Technical Advisor 3 14114 $ f $ $ 3 $ Twining Projeet Manager $ 120.80 $ 966.39 $ - $ - S • $ 3 - $ 1415.9E1 $ 2.615.98 S - S - E 13,046.32 Twining Feld Technician $ 110.11 $ 8,809.04 5 8.809.04 Y 0009.04 $ 4,40452 3 4,40352 $ 2,20226 S - 5 - $ - 5 - $ 138,742.31 TwHhp Field Technician $ 102.32 S 15,552.65 i 4.097-80 $ • 16,37122 S 6i1a5,61 3. - $16551 3 4,03280 S 3 i S - 5 234.926.94 Twining :,.h. ( , :': _R tiff 4!.}`f' t hr:;.i!4.Fri at7 a�.:".I ::: Y 1.F.z 1� Survey Manager 8 D7.19 $ 1887A9 $ 1,897.49 97. $ 1,697.48 S - 3 - $ 1,897.19 3 - $ - i - $ - $1 $ 32.731.72 PSpn83 $ 446,153.84 CerGfied Party Chief S 13484 $ 13,653.71 3 - S 12,315.34 S - S - $ 12,315.34 $ 6,84185 $ 6.84105 $ - 5 - $ 188,835.17 Psomas Intrumenbnan S 12239 i 12,258.65 3 i 11,03278 S. - 3 • $ 11,03278 $ 6,129.32 $ 6,129.32 $ S - $ 169,169.34 PSpmaa Office Surveyor 5 14094 S - 3 - 5 7147110 S - Y - $ ' 7,047.00 $ - S - S - S - $ 49,329.00 Psomss Projecl ASSiptant S 84.56 3 676.51 5 - $ 676S1 S - f - 5 • '- S - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,08&et PSOna $ g - $ $ - g n- c..2u,- h'.A''ay `yY �'S"-Fla :if F.,,Wrj`�.555 ....... ...+` ... ..'•5.5.Sgot;.- -5>:;;Sl3 .$ Outreach Manager $ 1552 83. S 83 i 8306 S 3 82208 $ - 62206 i 2. Aeijano and Associates 67565-02 Outreach Speciafisl 105.41 S 42.26 S 3426 84128 84326 84326 843.26 7.406.08 Arrellano and Associates ]ubeachSpecia6sl $ 88.13 352.51 5 15251 $ S 10.399.10 ArteOaw and As5DCE1¢5 S - $ •- - - _=i:'s r •.r' , ...r•:vq•_ ,V-. - ... .,. .c::.A 5 200,760.21 $ 106,546.42 5 207,042.44 5 116,180.34 5 104,782.79 5 112,669.10 5 75,108.89 5 55.770.79 5 18,336.00 5 11,435.53 2,637,750A6 $ 540,674.74 5 160,651_21 3,852,317.21 5 2852217.21 5 3,852.317.21 • • • RCTC RIV-215 Widening Project Southstar Engineering & Consulting Inc. 19-Months Construction - CM Services Cost Summary Labor for Each Firm Total Fixed Fee (8%) Arrellano & Associates HDR CCC Psomas Southstar Twining Vali Cooper $ 67,665.02 $ 600,505.87 $ 446,153.84 $ 1,917,485.53 $ 523,668.35 $ 296,838.60 $ 5,413.20 $ 48,040.47 $ 35,692.31 $ 153,398.84 $ $ 41,893.47 $ $ 23,747.09 Labor Subtotal $ 3,852,317.21 $ 3,852,317.21 General and Administrative Costs ( 3% of subcontractor invoicing) Cost of Material Tests Cost of Other Direct Charges (ODC) Subtotal Labor and Materials Contingency to% Grand Total $ 58,044.95 $ 106,452.00 $ 80,750.00 $ 4,097,564.18 409,756.42 $ 4,507,320.58 *Note: Overtime will be minimized by staggering start time of staff. If RCTC requests and approves usage of overtime, any overtime utilized will be charged against the contingency amount identified above. RCTC RIV-215 Widening Project Southstar Engineering & Consulting Inc. 19-Months Construction - Other Direct Costs {ODCs Note At actual cost Description Office Space Estimated # 23 Unit Rate $ 1,500.00 Cost $ 34,500.00 At actual cost Telephones / Internet 23 $ 250.00 $ 5,750.00 At actual cost Utilities/Janitorial 23 $ 500.00 $ 11,500.00 Included in OH Computers / Office Equipment 0 0 $ - IncludedinOH Desk/Chair 0 0 $ - at cost on large orders, general office copying included in OH Photocopying/Printing $ 3,000.00 At actual cost Website (Geographlcs)/Newsletter $ 12,000.00 At actual cost 877 Helpline $ 1,500.00 At actual cost Postage $ 5,000.00 At actual cost Ceremony Rental Fees (Canopies, Chairs, Tables, etc.) $ 4,000.00 At actual cost Ceremony Supplies, Events, Refreshments, Mementos $ 1,000.00 At actual cost Courier Service $ 500,00 At actual cost Newspaper Advertisement for Open House/Hall Rental $ 2,000.00 ODC Subtotal $ 80,750.00 • • Proposed Services Maximum Density, CT 216 Type Roadway Excavation, Sand Backlit', Structural Excavation, Embankment Description Performed all testing associated with backbit and grading operations. The amount of tests will be contingent on time variety of material encountered during construction. Estimated # 40 Unit Rate $ 175.00 Cost - $ 7,000.00 Seive Analysis, CT 202- Roadway Excavation, Sand Badcfi8, Structural Excavation, Embankment Performed all testing associated with backlit] and grading operations. The amount of tests will be contingent on the variety of material encountered during construction. 10 $ 135.00 $ 1,350.00 R - Value CT 301 Roadway Excavation, Sand Bad<1i8, Structural Excavation, Embankment Performed all testing associated with back8d and grading operations. The amount of tests will be contingent on the variety of material encountered during Construction. 5 $ 255.00 $ 1,275.00 Maximum Density, CT 216 Aggregate Base, Aggregate Subbase Performed all testing associated with backfill and grading operations. The amount of tests will be contingent on the variety of material encountered during construction. 30 $ 175.00 $ 5,250.00 Seive Analysis, CT 202 Y Aggregate Base, Aggregate Subbase g9re 9a16per One Sample every 2500 tonnes or 2000 cubic yards (May be decreased to one day). $ 135.00 $ 2,160.00 Durability Index CT 229 Aggregate Base, Aggregate Subbase If inffial source changes and initially for acceptance. 2 $ 210.00 $ 420.00 Sand Equivalent q Aggregate Base, Aggregate Subbase One Sample every 2500 tonnes or WOO cubic yards (May be decreased to one per day). 16 $ 125.00 $ 2,000.00 Moisture Content CT 226 Aggregate Base, Aggregate Subbase Sampled and tested twice daffy if paid for by weight. 32 $ 25.00 $ 800.00 R-Value CT 301 Aggregate Base, Aggregate Subbase One Sample every 2500 tomes or 2000 cubic yams. 16 $ 275.00 $ 4,400_00 Maximum Density, CT 216 Structural Backlit' Performed all testing associated with backfill and grading operations. The amount of tests will be contingent on the variety of material encountered during construction. 6 $ 175.00 $ 1,050.00 Seive Analysis, CT 202 Structural Backtill Performed ad testing associated with backfill and grarffng operations. The amount of tests will be contingent on the variety of material encountered during construction. 6 $ 135.00 $ 810.00 . Sand Equivalent CT 217 Structural Baddill Performed all testing associated with backlit' and grading operations. The amount of tests will be contingent on the variety of material encountered during construction. 6 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 Compression Strength Testing ASTM C172, CT 540 Portland Cement Concrete - Bridge, Major Structures, Minor Structures1 set approximately every 250 cubic meters or 1 set per day 18 $ 29.00 $ 522.03 Fine Aggregate Sand Equivalent CT 217 Portland Cement Cordele - Bridge, Major Structures, Minor Structures 1 test per 250 pubic meters (If production is less than 250 cubic meters, 1 test per day). 18 $ 125.00 $ 2250.00 Sieve Analysis of Coarse Aggregate Portion CT 202 Portland Cement Concrete - Bridge, Major Structures, Minor Structures 1 test per 250 cubic meters (If production is less than 250 cubic meters, 1 test per day): 16 $ 10000 $ 1,80000 Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate Portion CT 202 Portland Cement Concrete - Bridge, Major Structures, Minor Structures 1 test per 250 cubic meters (If production is less than 250 cubic meters, 1 test per day). 18 $ 135.00 $ 2,430.00 Coarse Aggregate Cleanness Value C7 227 Poland Cement Concrete - Bridge, Major Structures, Minor Structures 1 test per 250 cubic meters (If production is less than 250 cc Meters, 1 lest per day). 18 $ 275.00 $ 4,950.00 SieveAnalysis of Aggregates CT 202 - 1 lest for every 12,500 Ions or 10% of contractors quality control testing 20 $ 135.00 $ 2,700.00 Aspha8 Content CT 382 1 lest for every 12,500 tons or 10% of contractors quarrty control testing 20 $ 195.00 $ 3,000.00 Moisture Content CT 310,370 1 test for every 12,500 tons or 10% of contractors quality control testing 20 $ 25.00 $ 500.00 Stabilomefer Value CT 366 1 test for every 12,500 tons or 10% of contractors quality control testing 20 $ 199.00 $ 3,980.00 Maximum Density, CT 375, 308 1 lest for every 12,500 tons or 10% of contractors quality control testing 20 $ 199.00 $ 3,980.00 Maximum Theoretical Specific Gravity RICE 1 test for every 12,500 tons or 10% of contractors quafdy control testing 20 $ 145.00 $ 2,900.00 Density of Core Samples, CT 308 1 test for every 250 tons. Cores to be obtained by the Contractor 503 $ 45.00 $ 22,500.00 Sieve Analysis of Aggregates CT 202 1 test for every 6,000 tons or 10% of contractors quality Centre' testing 5 $ 135.00 $ 675.00 Asphalt Content CT 382 1 test for every 6,000 tons or 10% of contractors quality control testing 5 $ 195.00 $ 975.00 Moisture Content CT 310, 370 1 test for every 6,000 tons or 10% of contractors quality control testing 5 $ 25.00 $ 125.00 laboratory Testing Allowance for Steel Billed as needed on a Time and Materials Bads for testing required that may be requested by Cffent. (Allowance Estimated) 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10p0000 Laboratory Testing Allowance ry Billed as needed on a Time and Materials Basis for testing required that may be requested by Client. (Allowance Estimated) 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 Tests Subtotal $ 106,452.00 601.0L'£Z $ /899'Z %8 869177 Z98£'0 992.0'4 0000'4 Jad000 PA G4'£6817 $ 9L697 %8 MOP'Z 5Z58'0 LZS9'0 0000'4 (uolun) SululMj b817£'Z %8 PPLVZ 9Z58'0 64Z£'0 0000'4 suluimi ti8'86£`E54 $ LLIZ7 %8 17£907 99E2'0 8L45'0 0000'4 JelnnncS 4E269'9E $ MC VC %8 00067 00Eb'4 OOLVO 0000'L seuwosd Lh'OPOV7 $ 0809'Z %8 ZZZ£•Z 8896'0 b£SE'0 0000'4 000 MOH WE44'S $ ME I, %8 0009'6 0009'0 0000'0 0000'4 sapelaossdtgouelle v aa� paxlj 3lioad 1-11" aalidl;InW Igo' }I;oid .talldalnIN nal paayaanp sanl�Ippd IloJARd fualss palm ullu saaildllinw ua u Act unnopmeaa8 peeLpeA0 •oul Bumnsuo0 Bulaaaulfiu3 aelsmos patom fuluem 91 Z-AIN OION • • District Agreement 08-1462 CEQA — The California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code, sections 21000 et seq.) that requires State and local agencies to identify the significant environmental impacts of their actions and to avoid or mitigate those significant impacts, if feasible. COMPLETION OF WORK — All PARTNERS have met all scope, cost, and schedule commitments included in this agreement and have signed a COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CLOSURE STATEMENT. CONSTRUCTION — The project component that includes the activities involved in the administration, acceptance, and final documentation of a construction contract for PROJECT. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CLOSURE STATEMENT A document signed by PARTNERS that verifies the completion of all scope, cost, and schedule commitments included in this agreement. FHWA — Federal Highway Administration. FHWA STANDARDS — FHWA regulations, policies and procedures, including, but not limited to, the guidance provided at http://www.fhwa.dot.Qov/programs.html. FUNDING PARTNER — A partner who commits a defined dollar amount to WORK. FUNDING SUMMARY - The table in which PARTNERS designate funding sources, types of funds, and the project components in which the funds are to be spent. Funds listed on the FUNDING SUMMARY are "not -to -exceed" amounts for each FUNDING PARTNER. HM-I — Hazardous material (including, but not limited to, hazardous waste) that may require removal and disposal pursuant to federal or state law whether it is disturbed by PROJECT or not. HM-2 — Hazardous material (including, but not limited to, hazardous waste) that may require removal and disposal pursuant to federal or state law only if disturbed by PROJECT. HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES — Management activities related to either HM-1 or HM-2 including, without limitation, any necessary manifest requirements and disposal facility designations. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY — The partner responsible for managing the scope, cost, and schedule of a project component to ensure the completion of that component. IQA — Independent Quality Assurance — Ensuring that IMPLEMENTING AGENCY'S quality assurance activities result in WORK being developed in accordance with the applicable standards and within an established Quality Management Plan. IQA does not include any work necessary to actually develop or deliver WORK or any validation by verifying or rechecking work performed by another partner. PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 2of18 • 139 District Agreement 08-1462 PARTNERS — The term that collectively references all of the signatory agencies to this agreement. This term only describes the relationship between these agencies to work together to achieve a mutually beneficial goal. It is not used in the traditional legal sense in which one partner's individual actions legally bind the other partners. PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN — A group of documents used to guide a project's execution and control throughout the project's lifecycle. RESIDENT ENGINEER — A civil engineer licensed in the State of California who is responsible for construction contract administration activities. Said engineer shall be independent of the design engineering company and the construction contractor. SCOPE SUMMARY — The table in which PARTNERS designate their commitment to specific scope activities within each project component as outlined by the Guide to Capital Project Delivery Workplan Standards (previously known as WBS Guide) available at http://vvww.dot.ca.gov/hq/projmgmt/guidance.htm. SHS — State Highway System. SPONSOR(S) — The partner that accepts the obligation to secure financial resources to fully fund WORK. This includes any additional funds beyond those committed in this agreement necessary to complete the full scope of WORK defined in this agreement or settle claims. SFM (State Furnished Material) — Any materials or equipment supplied by CALTRANS. WORK — All scope and cost commitments included in this agreement. RESPONSIBILITIES 9. RCTC is SPONSOR for all WORK. 10. RCTC is the only FUNDING PARTNER for this agreement. RCTC's funding commitment is defined in the FUNDING SUMMARY. 11. CALTRANS is the CEQA lead agency for PROJECT. 12. RCTC is IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for CONSTRUCTION. SCOPE Scope: General 13. All WORK will be performed in accordance with federal and Califomia laws, regulations, and standards. PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 3of18 140 District Agreement 08-1462 All WORK will be performed in accordance with FHWA STANDARDS and CALTRANS STANDARDS. 14. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for a project component will provide a Quality Management Plan for that component as part of the PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN. 15. CALTRANS will provide 1QA for the portions of WORK within existing and proposed SHS right of way. CALTRANS retains the right to reject noncompliant WORK, protect public safety, preserve property rights, and ensure that all WORK is in the best interest of the SHS. 16. RCTC may provide IQA for the portions of WORK outside existing and proposed SHS right of way. 17. PARTNERS may, at their own expense, have a representative observe any scope, cost, or schedule commitments performed by another partner. Observation does not constitute authority over those commitments. 18. Each partner will ensure that all of their personnel participating in WORK are appropriately qualified to perform the tasks assigned to them. 19. PARTNERS will invite each other to participate in the selection and retention of any consultants who participate in WORK. 20. PARTNERS will conform to sections 1720 — 1815 of the California Labor Code and all applicable regulations and coverage determinations issued by the Director of Industrial Relations if PROJECT work is done under contract (not completed by a partner's own employees) and is governed by the Labor Code's definition of a "public work" (section 1720(a)(1)). PARTNERS will include wage requirements in all contracts for "public work" and will require their contractors and consultants to include prevailing wage requirements in all agreement -funded subcontracts for "public work". 21. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for each project component included in this agreement will be available to help resolve WORK -related problems generated by that component for the entire duration of PROJECT. 22. CALTRANS will issue, upon proper application, at no cost, the encroachment permits required for WORK within SHS right of way. Contractors and/or agents, and utility owners will not perform WORK within SHS right of way without an encroachment permit issued in their name. 23. If unanticipated cultural, archaeological, paleontological, or other protected resources are discovered during WORK, all work in that area will stop until a qualified professional can PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 4of18 141 District Agreement 08-1462 evaluate the nature and significance of the discovery and a plan is approved for its removal or protection. RCTC will notify CALTRANS within twenty-four (24) hours of any discovery. 24. PARTNERS will hold all administrative draft and administrative final reports, studies, materials, and documentation relied upon, produced, created, or utilized for PROJECT in confidence to the extent permitted by law. Where applicable, the provisions of California Government Code section 6254.5(e) will govern the disclosure of such documents in the event that PARTNERS share said documents with each other. PARTNERS will not distribute, release, or share said documents with anyone other than employees, agents, and consultants who require access to complete WORK without the written consent of the partner authorized to release them, unless required or authorized to do so by law. 25. If any partner receives a public records request, pertaining to WORK under this agreement, that partner will notify PARTNERS within five (5) working days of receipt and make PARTNERS aware of any transferred public documents. PARTNERS will consult with each other prior to the release of any public documents related to the PROJECT and provided by the other partner. 26. If HM-1 or HM-2 is found during WORK, IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for the project component during which it is found will immediately notify PARTNERS. 27. CALTRANS, independent of PROJECT, is responsible for any HM-1 found within existing SHS right of way. CALTRANS will undertake HM-1 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES with minimum impact to PROJECT schedule. 28. If HM-1 is found outside existing SHS right of way, responsibility for such HM-1 rests with the owner(s) of the parcel(s) on which the HM-1 is found. AUTHORITY, in concert with the local agency having land use jurisdiction over the parcel(s), will ensure that HM-1 management activities are undertaken with minimum impact to PROJECT schedule. 29. If HM-2 is found within PROJECT limits, the public agency responsible for the advertisement, award, and administration (AAA) of the PROJECT construction contract will be responsible for HM-2 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES. 30. CALTRANS' acquisition or acceptance of title to any property on which any HM-1 or HM-2 is found will proceed in accordance with CALTRANS' policy on such acquisition. 31. PARTNERS will comply with all of the commitments and conditions set forth in the environmental documentation, environmental permits, approvals, and applicable agreements as those commitments and conditions apply to each partner's responsibilities in this agreement. PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 5of18 142 District Agreement 08-1462 32. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for each project component will furnish PARTNERS with written monthly progress reports during the implementation of WORK in that component. 33. Upon COMPLETION OF WORK, ownership and title to all materials and equipment constructed or installed as part of WORK_ within SHS right of way become the property of CALTRANS. 34. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY for a project component will accept, reject, compromise, settle, or litigate claims of any non -agreement parties hired to do WORK in that component. 35. PARTNERS will confer on any claim that may affect. WORK or PARTNERS' liability or responsibility under this agreement in order to retain resolution possibilities for potential future claims. No partner shall prejudice the rights of another partner until after PARTNERS confer on claim. 36. PARTNERS will maintain and make available to each other all WORK -related documents, including financial data, during the term of this agreement and retain those records for four (4) years from the date of termination or COMPLETION OF WORK, or three (3) years from the date of final federal voucher, whichever is later. 37. PARTNERS have the right to audit each other in accordance with generally accepted governmental audit standards. CALTRANS, the State auditor, FHWA, and RCTC will have access to all WORK -related records of each partner for audit, examination, excerpt, or transaction. The examination of any records will take place in the offices and locations where said records are generated and/or stored and will be accomplished during reasonable hours of operation. The audited partner will review the preliminary audit, findings, and recommendations, and provide written comments within 60 calendar days of receipt. Any audit dispute not resolved by PARTNERS is subject to dispute resolution. Any costs arising out of the dispute resolution process will be paid within 30 calendar days of the final audit or dispute resolution findings. 38. PARTNERS consent to service of process by mailing copies by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid. Such service becomes effective 30 calendar days after mailing. However, nothing in this agreement affects PARTNERS' rights to serve process in any other matter permitted by law. 39. PARTNERS will not incur costs beyond the funding commitments in this agreement. If IMPLEMENTING AGENCY anticipates that funding for WORK will be insufficient to PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 6 of 18 143 District Agreement 08-1462 complete WORK, SPONSOR(S) will seek out additional funds and PARTNERS will amend this agreement. 40. If WORK stops for any reason, IMPLEMENTING AGENCY will place all facilities impacted by WORK in a safe and operable condition acceptable to CAL TRANS. 41. If WORK stops for any reason, PARTNERS are still obligated to implement all applicable commitments and conditions included in the PROJECT environmental documentation, permits, agreements, or approvals that are in effect at the time that WORK stops, as they apply to each partner's responsibilities in this agreement, in order to keep PROJECT in environmental compliance until WORK resumes. 42. Each partner accepts responsibility to complete the activities that they selected on the SCOPE SUMMARY. Activities marked with "N/A" on the SCOPE SUMMARY are not included in the scope of this agreement. Scope: CONSTRUCTION 43. RCTC will advertise, open bids, award, and approve the construction contract in accordance with the Public Contract Code and the California Labor Code. RCTC will not advertise the construction contract until CALTRANS completes or accepts the final plans, specifications, and estimate package; CALTRANS approves the Right of Way Certification; and FUNDING PARTNERS fully fund WORK. By accepting responsibility to advertise and award the construction contract, RCTC also accepts responsibility to administer the construction contract. 44. RCTC will provide a RESIDENT ENGINEER and construction support staff who are independent of the design engineering company and construction contractor. 45. PARTNERS will implement changes to the construction contract through contract change orders (CCOs). PARTNERS will review and concur on all CCOs over $100,000. All CCOs affecting public safety or the preservation of property, all design and specification changes, and all major changes as defined in the CALTRANS Construction Manual will be approved by CALTRANS in advance of the CCO work to be performed. 46. If the lowest responsible construction contract bid (plus estimated contingencies, supplemental costs and State Furnished Material costs) is equal to or less than the amount shown on the FUNDING SUMMARY for CONSTRUCTION Capital, the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY may award the contract. If the lowest responsible construction contract bid is greater than the amount shown on the FUNDING SUMMARY for CONSTRUCTION Capital, all PARTNERS must be involved in determining how to proceed. If PARTNERS do not agree in writing on a course of action within 15 working days, this agreement will terminate. PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 7of18 144 District Agreement 08-1462 47. RCTC will require the construction contractor to furnish payment and performance bonds naming RCTC as obligee and to carry liability insurance in accordance with CALTRANS specifications. 48. RCTC will submit a written request to CALTRANS for any SFM identified in the PROJECT PS&E package a minimum of 45 calendar days. RCTC will submit a written request to CALTRANS for any additional SFM deemed necessary during PROJECT construction. 49. Upon receipt of both SFM and full payment of CALTRANS' invoice for estimated SFM costs, CALTRANS will make the SFM available at a CALTRANS-designated location. 50. CALTRANS will provide Source Inspection on reimbursed basis. 51. If the need for permits, agreements, and/or approvals arises, RCTC will coordinate the following resource agency permits, agreements, and/or approvals: Regional Water Quality Control Board (401), and Department of Fish and Game (1602). 52. If the need for permits, agreements, and/or approvals arises, RCTC will obtain the following resource agency permits, agreements, and/or approvals: Regional Water Quality Control Board (401), and Department of Fish and Game (1602). 53. If the need for permits, agreements, and/or approvals arises, RCTC will implement the following resource agency permits, agreements, and/or approvals: Regional Water Quality Control Board (401), and Department of Fish and Game (1602). 54. If the need for permits, agreements, and/or approvals arises, RCTC will renew and amend the following resource agency permits, agreements, and/or approvals: Regional Water Quality Control Board (401), and Department of Fish and Game (1602). 55. RCTC will provide maintenance for those portions of the SHS within WORK limits until COMPLETION OF WORK, after which, maintenance will be handled through an existing maintenance agreement. COST Cost: General 56. SPONSOR(S) will secure funds for all WORK including any additional funds beyond the FUNDING PARTNERS' existing commitments in this agreement. Any change to the funding commitments outlined in this agreement requires an amendment to this agreement. 57. The cost of any awards, judgments, or settlements generated by WORK is a WORK cost. 58. CALTRANS, independent of PROJECT, will pay all costs for HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES related to HM-1 found within existing SHS right of way. PACT version 9.1 5-28-09 8of18 • 145 District Agreement 08-1462 59. Independent of PROJECT, all costs for management activities related to HM-1 found outside the existing SHS right of way will be the responsibility of the owner(s) of the parcel(s) where the HM-1 is located.. 60. HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES costs related to HM-2 are a PROJECT . CONSTRUCTION cost. 61. The cost of coordinating, obtaining, complying with, implementing, and if necessary renewing and amending resource agency permits, agreements, and/or approvals is a WORK cost. 62. The cost to comply with and implement the commitments set forth in the environmental documentation is a WORK cost. 63. The cost to ensure that PROJECT remains in environmental compliance is a WORK cost. 64. The cost of any legal challenges to the CEQA environmental process or documentation is a WORK cost. 65. Independent of WORK costs, CALTRANS will fund the cost of its own IQA for WORK done within existing or proposed future SHS right of way. 66. Independent of WORK costs, RCTC will fund the cost of its own IQA for WORK done outside existing or proposed future SHS right of way. 67. Fines, interest, or penalties levied against any partner will be paid, independent of WORK costs, by the partner whose actions or lack of action caused the levy. That partner will indemnify and defend all other partners. 68. The cost to place PROJECT right of way in a safe and operable condition and meet all environmental commitments is a WORK cost. 69. Because IMPLEMENTING AGENCY is responsible for managing the scope, cost, and schedule of a project component, if there are insufficient funds available in this agreement to place the right of way in a safe and operable condition, the appropriate IMPLEMENTING AGENCY accepts responsibility to fund these activities until such time as PARTNERS amend this agreement. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY may request reimbursement for these costs during,the amendment process. 70. If there are insufficient funds in this agreement to implement applicable commitments and conditions included in the PROJECT environmental documentation, permits, agreements, and/or approvals that are in effect at a time that WORK stops, the partner implementing the commitments or conditions accepts responsibility to fund these activities until such time as PARTNERS amend this agreement. PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 9of18 146 District Agreement 08-1462 That partner may request reimbursement for these costs during the amendment process. 71. PARTNERS will pay invoices within 30 calendar days of receipt of invoice. 72. FUNDING PARTNERS accept responsibility to provide the funds identified on the FUNDING SUMMARY. 73. SPONSOR(S) accepts responsibility to ensure full funding for the identified scope of work. Cost:. CONSTRUCTION Support 74. The cost to maintain the SHS within WORK limits is a WORK cost until COMPLETION OF WORK, after which, the cost of maintenance will be handled through an existing maintenance agreement. 75. Each PARTNER listed below may submit invoices for CONSTRUCTION Support: • RCTC will invoice CALTRANS 76. PARTNERS will exchange funds for actual costs. RCTC will submit to CALTRANS monthly invoices for costs of the prior month's actual expenditures. After PARTNERS agree that all WORK is complete, RCTC will submit a final accounting for all WORK costs. Based on the final accounting, PARTNERS will refund or invoice as necessary in order to satisfy the obligation of this agreement. Cost: CONSTRUCTION Capital 77. The cost of all STATE FURNISHED MATERIAL is a CONSTRUCTION capital cost. CAL F ANS will invoice RCTC for the actual cost of any STATE -FURNISHED MATERIAL. 78. Each PARTNER listed below may submit invoices for CONSTRUCTION Capital: • RCTC will invoice CALTRANS 79. PARTNERS will exchange funds for actual costs. RCTC will submit to CALTRANS monthly invoices for costs of the prior month's actual expenditures. PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 l0 of 18 147 District Agreement 08-1462 After PARTNERS agree that all WORK is complete, RCTC will submit a final accounting for all WORK costs. Based on the final accounting, PARTNERS will refund or invoice as necessary in order to satisfy the obligation of this agreement. SCHEDULE 80. PARTNERS will manage the schedule for WORK through the work plan included in the PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN. GENERAL CONDITIONS 81. This agreement will be understood in accordance with and governed by the Constitution and laws of the State of California. This agreement will be enforceable in the State of California. Any legal action arising from this agreement will be filed and maintained in the Superior Court of the county in which the CALTRANS district office signatory to this agreement resides. 82. CALTRANS invoices for support costs including all direct and applicable indirect costs. Applicable indirect costs are determined by the type of funds being used to pay for support. State and federal funds are subject to the Program Functional Rate. Local funds (Measure money, developer fees, special assessments, etc.) are subject to the Program Functional Rate and the Administration Rate. CALTRANS establishes the Program Functional Rate and the Administration Rate annually according to State and Federal regulations. 83. All obligations of CALTRANS under the terms of this agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature, the State Budget Act authority, and the allocation of funds by the California Transportation Commission. 84. Any PARTNER who performs IQA does so for its own benefit, further, that PARTNER cannot be assigned liability due to it's IQA activities. 85. Neither RCTC nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CALTRANS under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction conferred upon CALTRANS under this agreement. It is understood and agreed that CALTRANS will fully defend, indemnify, and save harmless RCTC and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description brought forth under, but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation, or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CALTRANS under this agreement. 86. Neither CALTRANS nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage, or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by RCTC PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 11 of 18 148 District Agreement 08-1462 under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction conferred upon RCTC under this agreement. It is understood and agreed that RCTC will fully defend, indemnify, and save harmless CALTRANS and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description brought forth under, but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation, or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by RCTC under this agreement. 87. This agreement is not intended to create a third party beneficiary or define duties, obligations, or rights in parties not signatory to this agreement. This agreement is not intended to affect the legal liability of PARTNERS by imposing any standard of care for completing WORK different from the standards imposed by law. 88. PARTNERS will not assign or attempt to assign agreement obligations to parties not signatory to this agreement. 89. Any ambiguity contained in this agreement will not be interpreted against PARTNERS. PARTNERS waive the provisions of California Civil Code section 1654. 90. A waiver of a partner's performance under this agreement will not constitute a continuous waiver of any other provision. An amendment made to any article or section of this agreement does not constitute an amendment to or negate all other articles or sections of this agreement. 91. A delay or omission to exercise a right or power due to a default does not negate the use of that right or power in the future when deemed necessary. 92. If any partner defaults in their agreement obligations, the non -defaulting partner(s) will request in writing that the default be remedied within 30 calendar days. If the defaulting partner fails to do so, the non -defaulting partner(s) may initiate dispute resolution. 93. PARTNERS will first attempt to resolve agreement disputes at the PROJECT team level. If they cannot resolve the dispute themselves, the CAL TRANS district director and the executive officer of RCTC will attempt to negotiate a resolution. If no resolution is reached, PARTNERS' legal counsel will initiate mediation. PARTNERS agree to participate in mediation in good faith and will share equally in its costs. Neither the dispute nor the mediation process relieves PARTNERS. from full andtiraely performance of WORK in accordance with the terms of this agreement. However, if any partner stops WORK, the other partner(s) may seek equitable relief to ensure that WORK continues. Except for equitable relief, no partner may file a civil complaint until after mediation, or 45 calendar days after filing the written mediation request, whichever occurs first. PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 12 Of 18 • 149 District Agreement 08-1462 Any civil complaints will be filed in the Superior Court of the county in which the CALTRANS district office signatory to this agreement resides. The prevailing partner will be entitled to an award of all costs, fees, and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees as a result of litigating a dispute under this agreement or to enforce the provisions of this article including equitable relief. 94. PARTNERS maintain the ability to pursue alternative or additional dispute remedies if a previously selected remedy does not achieve resolution. 95. If any provisions in this agreement are deemed to be, or are in fact, illegal, inoperative, or unenforceable, those provisions do not render any or all other agreement provisions invalid, inoperative, or unenforceable, and those provisions will be automatically severed from this agreement. 96. This agreement is intended to be PARTNERS' final expression and supersedes all prior oral understanding or writings pertaining to WORK. 97. If during performance of WORK additional activities or environmental documentation is necessary to keep PROJECT in environmental compliance, PARTNERS will amend this agreement to include completion of those additional tasks. 98. PARTNERS will execute a formal written amendment if there are any changes to the commitments made in this agreement. 99. This agreement will terminate upon COMPLETION OF WORK or upon 30 calendar days' written notification to terminate and acceptance between PARTNERS, whichever occurs first. However, all indemnification, document retention, audit, claims, environmental commitment, legal challenge, and ownership articles will remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement. 100. The following documents are attached to, and made an express part of this agreement: SCOPE SUMMARY, FUNDING SUMMARY. 101. Signatories may execute this agreement through individual signature pages provided that each signature is an original. This agreement is not fully executed until all original signatures are attached. PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 13 of 18 150 District Agreement 08-1462 CONTACT INFORMATION The information provided below indicates the primary contact data for each partner to this agreement. PARTNERS will notify each other in writing of any personnel or location changes. These changes do not require an amendment to this agreement. The primary agreement contact person for CALTRANS is: Emad Makar, Project Manager 464 West 4th Street, 6th Floor, (MS-1229) San Bernardino, California 92401-1400 Office Phone: (909) 383-4978 Mobile Phone: (909) 289-4632 Fax Number: (909) 383-6472 Email: emad_makar@dot.ca.gov The primary agreement contact person for RCTC is: Lisa DaSilva, Capital Project Manager 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, California 92502-2208 Office Phone: (951) 787-7141 Email: Ldasilva@rctc.org PACT Version 9.1 5-28-09 14 of 18 151 • District Agreement 08-1462 SIGNATURES PARTNERS declare that: 1. Each partner is an authorized legal entity under California state law. 2. Each partner has the authority to enter into this agreement. 3. The people signing this agreement have the authority to do so on behalf of their public agencies. STATE OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: Raymond W. Wolfe, PhD By: District Director Anne Mayer Executive Director CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS: Attest: Best, Best and Krieger • By: Legal Counsel Lisa Pacheco Budget Manager PACT Version 9.1 3.31.08 15of18 152 08-RI V-215-R8.2/R 16.0 EA: OF161 District Agreement 08-1462 'SCOPE SUMMARY ©oimmis ■ 270 ■■■ .- 10 -. --®-- --®-- ■E■ 05 ■ --. 10 - ---®- .-- 20 - -_111111®. --- 40 - ---®- MINIM 50 - ---m- .- 30 -. --®-- --. 05 - --- 10 - --- 20 . -- 40 -. --®-- -- 88 -- ■sm111■ m= OM 80 Ell . 285 Min. -- 05 .. -- 10 .. Construction (CON) - 270, 285, 290, 295 Construction Engineering and General Contract Administration Construction Staking Padcage and Control Construdion Stakes Construction Engineering Work Construction Contract Administration Work Secured Lease for Resident Engineer Office Space or Trailer Set Up Construction Project Files X X X X X X X X X X Pre -Construction Meeting Progress Pay Estimates Weekly Statement of Working Days Construction Project Files and General Field Office Clerical Work Labor Compliance Activities X X X Approved Subcontractor Substitutions Coordination Civil Rights Contract Compliance X X Other Construction Contract Administration Products Contract Item Work Inspection Construction Material Sampling and Testing X X X Materials Sampling and Testing for Quality Assurance Plant Inspection for Quality Assurance Independent Assurance Sampling and Testing Source Inspection Safety and Maintenance Reviews Relief From Maintenance Process Final Inspection and Acceptance Recommendation Plant Establishment Administration Transportation Management Plan Implementation During Construction Resource Agency Permit Renewal and Extension R- . uests X X X X X X X X Long -Tenn Environmental Mitigation/Mitigation Monitoring Durin. Construction Contract Other Construction Engineering and General Contract Administration Contract Change Order Administration Contract Change Order Process Functional Support X X X X X X PACT Version 9.1 3.31.08 16 of 18 153 District Agreement 08-1462 290 Resolve Contract Claims X 05 Analysis of Notices of Potential Claims X 10 Supporting Documentation and Responses to Notices of Potential Claims X 15 Reviewed and Approved Claim Report X 20 District Claim Meeting or Board of Review X 25 Arbitration Hearing X 30 Negotiated Claim Settlement X 35 Technical Support X 295 Accept Contract, Prepare Final Construction Estimate, and Final Report X X 05 Processed Estimate After Acceptance X 10 Proposed Final Contract Estimate X 15 As -Built Plans X 20 Project History File X 25 Final Report X 30 Processed Final Estimate X 35 Certificate of Environmental Compliance X 40 Long Term Environmental Mitigation/Mitigation Monitoring After Construction Contract Acceptance X 45 Post -Construction Tragic Operations Activities X Other Accept Contract! Prepare Final Construction Estimate and Final Report X PACT Version9.1 3.31.08 17of18 • 154 99l 8I 30 8I 90' l£'£ re uois.QA 10'dd 00'000'001.'99$ 00'000'0L9'84$ 00'000'0£9'9$ 00'000'0£9'9$ 00'000'OLS'84$ wauodwoo sielolgns �x�wns Ouiaun3 Z9171-80 luauiaaaSV Pix1sIG I9id0:V2 0'9111/n11-S I Z-A111-80 • • • AGENDA ITEM 8G RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Lisa DaSilva, Capital Projects Manager Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement with the Department of California Highway Patrol for Construction Zone Enhanced Enforcement Program services for the State Route 74/Interstate 215 Interchange Project in the City of Perris and the Interstate 215 Widening Project from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road, North of the City of Murrieta STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 10-31-113-00 with the Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP) for Construction Zone Enhanced Enforcement Program (COZEEP) traffic control services during construction of the 74/215 interchange project in the city of Perris and the Interstate 215 widening project from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road, north of the city of Murrieta, for the amount of $285,978 plus a contingency amount of $28,622 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total not to exceed amount of $314,600; and 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The 74/215 interchange in the city of Perris is one of the last remaining highway projects in the 1989 Measure A expenditure plan. T he final design of the project was approved by Caltrans in February 2010. At its May 12, 2010 meeting, the Commission awarded Agreement No. 10-31-030-00 to Skanska USA Civil West (Skanska) for the construction of the 74/215 interchange project. A notice to proceed (NTP) for construction is planned for early July 2010. At its December 10, 2008 meeting, the Commission awarded Agreement No. 09-31-045-00 to URS Corporation to perform final design of the. 1-215 widening project from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road, north of the city of Murrieta. The final design package was submitted to Caltrans for approval on Agenda Item 8G 156 June 15, 2010. The project is scheduled to be advertised for construction bids in September 2010, and it is anticipated that construction will start in early 2011. COZEEP traffic control services are required during construction as a safety measure to increase traffic enforcement above normal levels in construction situations where traffic problems are anticipated in an effort to reduce potential for traffic accidents and to reduce traffic speeds. CHP may be used to slow down, or assist in stopping or directing traffic to enable necessary breaks in traffic for critical movements of the contractor's equipment and operations. Staff coordinated with the CHP to develop an agreement for COZEEP traffic control services to be provided by the CHP Temecula area office. The agreement includes COZEEP traffic control services for both the 74/215 Interchange Project and the 1-215 widening project from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road. The draft agreement with the CHP is attached. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Agreement No. 10-31-113-00 with the CHP for COZEEP traffic control services during construction of the 74/215 Interchange improvement project in the city of Perris and the 1-215 widening project from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Scott Road, north of the city of Murrieta, for the amount of $285,978, plus a contingency amount of $28,622 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total not to exceed amount of $ 314, 600. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12+ Amount: $100,000 $214,600 Source of Funds: TUMF and CMIA Budget Ad ustment: No GLA No.: 003015 81304 00000 0000 222 31 81301 003022 81304 00000 0000 262 31 81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: 4114,440 Date: 06/29/10 Attachment: Agreement No. 10-31-113-00 with CHP Agenda Item 8G • 157 ATTACHMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD AGREEMENT STD 213 (Rev 06/03) ANALYST INITIALS. AGREEMENT NUMBER 9R685000 REGISTRATION NUMBER 1. This Agreement is entered into between the State Agency and the Contractor named below: STATE AGENCY'S NAME Department of California Highway Patrol CONTRACTOR'S NAME STATE AGENCY'S NAME Riverside County Transportation Commission 2. The term of this June 1, 2010 through August 1, 2012 Agreement is: 3. The maximum amount $ 285,978.00 of this Agreement is: Two Hundred Eight Five Thousand, Nine Hundred Seventy -Eight Dollars and Zero Cents 4. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following exhibits, which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement. • Exhibit A— Scope of Work Exhibit B — Budget Detail and Payment Provisions 2 page(s) 1 page(s) Exhibit C* — General Terms and Conditions GTC 610 Check mark one item below as Exhibit D: 0 Exhibit - D Special Terms and Conditions (Attached hereto as part of this agreement) Exhibit - D* Special Terms and Conditions 1 page(s) Attachment 1 — Project Plans 7 page(s) Items shown with an Asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made part of this agreement as if attached hereto. These documents can be viewed at www.ols.dgs.ca.gov/Standard+Language IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto. CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S NAME (if other than an individual, state whether a corporation, partnership, etc.) Riverside County Transportation Commission BY (Authorized Signature) ,2S DATE SIGNED(Do not type) PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING ADDRESS 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Annex Riverside, CA 92501 STATE OF CALIFORNIA AGENCY NAME Department of California Highway Patrol BY (Authorized Signature) ,@S DATE SIGNED(Do not type) PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING T. L. ANDERSON, Assistant Chief, Administrative Services Division •ADDRESS P.O. Box 942898, Sacramento, CA 94298-0001 California Department of General Services Use Only ❑ Exempt per 158 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK Riverside County Transportation Commission CHP Agreement # 9R685000 Exhibit A page 1 of 2 1. The Contractor, Riverside County Transportation Commission (County) agrees to reimburse the Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP) for costs associated with traffic control related services provided by the CHP Temecula Area office. Traffic control services shall be provided for the reconstruction of 1-215 between Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Scott Road, in the city of Murrieta, as well as for the reconstruction of the SR-74 (4t St.) interchange at I-215. See attached Project Plans for more detailed description of reconstruction route (Attachment I). 2. The services shall be provided during: The hours of duty performed by CHP officer(s) under this Agreement are those mutually agreed upon by CHP Contract Coordinator and County. Any changes to the proposed plan such as additional hours, dates, and sites for traffic control can be requested and/or on an "as needed" basis and must be mutually agreed upon by the local CHP command and County. 3. The project representatives during the term of this agreement will be: STATE AGENCY Department of California Highway Patrol NAME Officer Dan England TELEPHONE NUMBER (951)506-2000 Direct all inquiries to : FAX NUMBER (951)506-2002 CONTRACTOR Riverside County Transportation Commission NAME Lisa DaSilva TELEPHONE NUMBER (951)787-7141 EMAIL: Idasilva@rctc.org STATE AGENCY Department of California Highway Patrol CONTRACTOR Riverside County Transportation Commission SECTION/UNIT - Business Services Section/Contract Services Unit SECTION/UNIT ATTENTION Melissa Hall ATTENTION Lisa DaSilva, Capital Projects Program Manager ADDRESS P.O. Box 942898, Sacramento, CA 94298-0001 ADDRESS 4080 Lemon St., 3rd Floor Annex, Riverside, CA 92501 TELEPHONE NUMBER (916)843-3611 EMAIL: mehall(cilchp.ca.gov TELEPHONE NUMBER (951)787-7141 EMAIL: Idasilva@rctc.org 159 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK (Continued) 5. Detailed description of work to be performed: Riverside County Transportation Commission CHP Agreement # 9R685000 Exhibit A page 2 of 2 • A. CHP Temecula Area office shall provide CHP officers) with vehicles and coordinate all traffic control. Should the CHP Temecula Area be unable to fill the necessary staffing for each event, the shortage of CHP Officers will be utilized from out - of -Area uniformed personnel. B. The traffic control service to be performed by CHP officer(s) under this Agreement, including the standards of performance, discipline and control thereof, shall be the responsibility of CHP. C. It is understood by County that billing of CHP officers) time shall be from portal to portal (CHP Area office to the service location and return to CHP Area office) except as specified in Item D. D. If the CHP officer(s) has reported to the assigned location and has worked less than four (4) hours, County agrees to pay every assigned CHP officers) a minimum of four (4) hours overtime. Exception: This does not apply to those cases when the hours worked is part of an extended shift. If the CHP officers) reports) to the assigned service location and if for any reason CHP reassigns the officer(s) away from the service location, County will be billed only for the officers) actual time incurred from the CHP Area office to the service location and for the time spent at the assigned service location covered under this Agreement. E. CANCELLATION County shall not be charged for service cancellations made more than 24 hours prior to the scheduled assignment. 1. County agrees that if service cancellation is made within 24 hours prior to the scheduled assignment and the assigned CHP officer(s) cannot be notified of such service cancellation, a minimum of four (4) hours overtime shall be charged for each assigned CHP officer. 2. County agrees that if service cancellation is made within 24 hours prior to the scheduled assignment and CHP officer(s) is notified of such service cancellation, County shall only be charged a short notice service cancellation fee of $50.00 per assigned CHP officer(s). 3. All service cancellation notices to CHP must be made during normal CHP business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding state holidays. 4. The CHP agrees to make reasonable efforts to notify the assigned CHP officer(s) of the service cancellation. • 160 EXHIBIT B BUDGET DETAIL AND PAYMENT PROVISIONS 1. Invoicing and Payment Riverside County Transportation Commission CHP Agreement # 9R685000 Exhibit B page 1 of 1 A. The CHP shall provide County with an itemized invoice which details all CHP costs for traffic control services under this Agreement. Monthly itemized invoices will be submitted in duplicate to: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Annex Riverside, CA 92501 County agrees to pay CHP within thirty (30) days after the date of the invoice. B. This Agreement reflects the following estimates of hourly usages and anticipated mileage for the Traffic Control Services to be provided Officer Hours: Patrol car mileage: 3,520 hours 11,000 miles C. In consideration for the traffic control services contained herein, County agrees to reimburse the CHP upon receipt of an itemized invoice. County agrees to reimburse the CHP for the actual costs incurred at the time services are provided. The rates indicated in this agreement are for estimate purposes only. It is understood by both parties that rate increases in salary and benefits are governed by collective bargaining agreements and/or statute and that no advance written notification is necessary prior to implementing the increased rates. In the event CHP is granted a rate increase, County agrees to pay the increased rate. The following information are the CHP officer and sergeant overtime rates effective Fiscal Year 09/10, until superseded: CLASSIFICATION OVERTIME RATE CHP Officer CHP Sergeant M/C Officer M/C Sergeant CHP Automobile CHP Motorcycle $79.15 per hour $96.22 per hour $81.88 per hour $99.55 per hour $0.67 per mile $0.85 per mile 161 EXHIBIT D SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Riverside County Transportation Commission CHP Agreement # 9R685000 Exhibit D page 1 of 1 I. The CHP and County agree this Agreement may be canceled by either party with thirty (30) days advance written notice. 2. In the event of an emergency, this Agreement may be canceled by either party without prior notice. 3. The CHP and County, agree that this Agreement may be amended by written mutual consent of the parties hereto. 4. Unforeseen events may require CHP officer(s) to expend hours in excess of the original estimate. Any costs in excess of the original estimated amount will be processed by appropriate amendment to the Agreement, to reflect the actual costs incurred. 5. Additional charges may be assessed for CHP supplies, additional equipment utilized, damage to property repaired or replaced at state expense, which are directly related to the services provided herein, but only to the extent such supplies or additional equipment are specifically requested in writing by County or such need for repair or replacement of property arises directly from County gross misconduct or willful negligence with respect to the property. 6. Gifts, donations, or gratuities may not be accepted by CHP employees in their own behalf or in behalf of the Department, informal squad club, or other local funds. 7. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under the terms of this agreement which is not disposed within a reasonable period of time (ten days) by the parties normally responsible for the administration of this contract shall be brought to the attention of the Administrative Services Officer (or designated representative) of each organization for joint resolution 8. County agrees that the awarding department, the Department of General Services, the Bureau of State Audits, or their designated representative shall have the right to review and to copy and records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. County agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated. County agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during no business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. F County agrees to include a similar right of the State to audit records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of this Agreement. (Gov. Code §8546.7, Pub. Contract Code §10115 et CCR Title 2, Section 1896). 9. Any dispute conceming a question of fact arising under the terms of this agreement which is not disposed within a reasonable period of time (ten days) by the parties normally responsible for the administration of this contract shall be brought to the attention of the Administrative Services Officer (or designated representative) of each organization for joint resolution 10. The County agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the state, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, laborers, and any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Agreement, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation who may be injured or damaged by County in the performance of this Agreement. 11. The County agrees to provide CHP with a resolution, motion, order or ordinance of the goveming body, which authorizes execution of this Agreement, and indicates the individual who is authorized to sign the Agreement on behalf of County. 162 • AGENDA ITEM 8H • • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION . DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Andrea Zureick, Senior Staff Analyst Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Years 2011-15 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FYs 2011-15 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) for Local Streets and Roads as submitted. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Measure A imposes several requirements on local agencies requesting to receive local streets and roads funds. First, the Coachella Valley and Western County cities and the county must be participating in either the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) or Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. Western County agencies must also participate in the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan managed by the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). The cities of Beaumont and La Quinta are not TUMF participants, and Commission staff is in the process of obtaining confirmation from CVAG, WRCOG, and RCA regarding the current participation in their programs. Additionally, agencies are required to annually provide to the Commission a CIP detailing how those funds are to be expended and an annual certification of maintenance of effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. On February 8, 2010, Commission staff . provided the local agencies with Measure A revenue projections for local streets and roads to assist in preparation of the required CIP and the FY 2009/10 MOE base year amounts approved by the Commission on July 8, 2009, to which the agency would certify their programs. The required CIP, MOE certification, and supporting documentation have been received from all of the local agencies. The FY 2010/11 disbursements are expected to begin in September 2010. The CIPs received are posted on the Commission's website and are on file at the Commission office. 163 Agenda Item 8H Attachment: FYs 201 1-15 Measure A Five -Year CIPs — Posted on Commission's • Website 164 Agenda Item 8H 89060 TT, SM City of Banning Public Works Department May 3, 2010 Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3"i Floor Riverside, CA 92502 o 4 2 y; TRANSPORTATION COWISSIti� Attention: Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Manager Subject: Annual Maintenance of Effort and Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Measure "A" Dear Mrs. Medina: Enclosed, please find the Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2011-2015 as approved by the City Council during its regular meeting on April 27, 2010 along with the Maintenance of Effort Certificate Statement. Additionally, the certified Staff Report and Resolution are also included for your use. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please call Arturo Vela at (951) 922-3130. Sincerely, Kahono Oei, P.E. City Engineer Copy: Duane Burk, Director of Public Works File Enc. Measure "A" Five -Year Plan Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement Certified Staff Report and Resolution 99 E. Ramsey St. • P.O. Box 998 • Banning, CA 92220-0998 • (951) 922-3130 • Fax (951) 922-3141 X.29.01 Agency: Page: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2011-2015 City of Banning 1 of 5 Arturo Vela (951)922-3130 April 1, 2010 Citywide Street 1 Y2" Asphaltic Concrete (A.C.) Overlay Program YEAR 2011 STREET LOCATION — FROM / TO TOTAL COST ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) ITEM NO. 1. Sunset Avenue — Ramsey Street to Wilson Street 175 175 2. Wilson Street — Sunrise Avenue to McGovern Avenue 176 176 TOTAL 351 351 Agency: Page: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2011-2015 City of Banning 2of5 Arturo Vela (951) 922-3130 April 1, 2010 Citywide Street 1 %" Asphaltic Concrete (A.C.) Overlay Program ITEM NO. YEAR 2012 STREET LOCATION — FROM / TO TOTAL COST ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) 1. Monroe Street — 22"d Street to Jefferson 42 42 2. Jefferson Street — 22"d Street to Monroe Street 35 35 3. Wilson Street — McGovern Ave to Mountain Ave 160 160 4. Wesley Street — Hargrave Street to 1401 E. Wesley St 60 60 5. _ Charles Street — Hargrave Street to 1037 E. Charles St 38 38 6. 23rd Street — Lincoln Street to End 25 25 TOTAL 360 360 Agency: Page: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2011-2015 City of Banning 3 of 5 Arturo Vela (951)922-3130 April 1, 2010 Citywide Street 1 %:" Asphaltic Concrete (A.C.) Overlay Program ITEM NO. YEAR 2013 STREET LOCATION — FROM / TO TOTAL COST ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) 1. Ramsey Street — 4th Street to Hargrave Street 246 246 2. 41st Street — Jacinto View to Wilson Street 65 65 3. 40th Street — Jacinto View to George Street 35 35 4. George Street — 40th Street to 41st Street 25 25 TOTAL 371 371 Agency: Page: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2011-2015 City of Banning 4of5 Arturo Vela (951)922-3130 April 1, 2010 Citywide Street 1 %a" Asphaltic Concrete (A.C.) Overlay Program ITEM NO. YEAR 2014 STREET LOCATION — FROM / TO TOTAL COST ($1,000) 270 MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) 270 1. Nicolet Street — Sims Street to Sunset Avenue 2. 2" Street — Livingston Street to Williams Street 45 45 3. 3rd Street — Livingston Street to Williams Street 70 70 TOTAL 385 385 Agency: Page: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2011-2015 City of Banning 5 of 5 Arturo Vela (951)922-3130 April 1, 2010 Citywide Street 1 %" Asphaltic Concrete (A.C.) Overlay Program ITEM NO. YEAR 2015 STREET LOCATION - FROM/TO TOTAL COST ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) 1. Ramsey Street — 8th Street to 22" Street 300 300 2. Hargrave Street — Ramsey Street to Railroad Tracks 55 55 3. 22"d Street — Ramsey Street to Railroad Tracks 50 50 TOTAL 405 405 2011-2015 GRAND TOTAL 1,872 1,872 89178 GA/AZ/SM City of Banning Public Works Department lb L �,iV%ET11 May 24, 2010 Ms. Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon St., 3`d Floor Riverside, CA 92502 Re: Measure "A" Project Status Report for Fiscal Year 2010 Dear Ms. Medina: RiVi. `511'E'_O COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION This letter is written to provide you with an update of the approved Measure "A" streets from the 2010 Five -Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Project list. The Specifications for the City of Banning's Project No. 2010-02 "A.C. Overlay and Pavement` RehabilitatiOn'ort Various Streets," are currently being prepared and include streets to be paved using Measure "A" funds. These streets are attached as Exhibit "A". The strg,t locatipns previously submitted to the Riverside County Transportation Commission tOi' hiscal"'Year 2010 were moved to Fiscal Year 2011 due to changes in street rehabilitation priorities. We anticipate that the project will be awarded by the City Council by August 24, 2010, and the construction of the project should therefore be completed by November, 2010. Also, as requested, I have included the Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement signed by the City Manager which now references Ordinance No. 02-001. If you need any further assistance, please contact me at (951) 922-3130. Sincerely Yours, Arturo Vela, P.E. Assistant, Civil. Engineer Copy:' Duane'Mirk;DirettorofPublicW its ' KahonoOei,<City Engineer File 99 E. Ramsey St. • 'P.O: Box 998.. Banning; CA 92220-0998 • (951) 922-3130 • Fax (951) 922-3141 EXHIBIT "A" PROJECT NO.2010-02 No. Street Locations 1-1/2" to 2-1/2" of A.C. Overlay 6" A.C. Berm 4" of A.C. over Base Grade, Compact, and Place Specified Base 1. Sunset Avenue: Ramsey Street to Wilson Street x 2. Wilson Street: Sunrise Avenue to McGovern Avenue x x x x NOTE: Asterisk in column indicates the type of street improvement to be performed. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for The City of Banning (the " Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: 05 — � , 2010 CITY MANAGER ATTTEESyT:J /d SECRETARY V_HiA(kit June 10, 2010 235 north Broadway / Blythe, California 92225 Phone (760) 922-6161 / Fax (760) 922-4938 Riverside County Transportation Commission Attn: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Ms. Trevino: Enclosed is the City of Blythe's Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads. This item is included in the 2010/11 Comprehensive Annual Operating and Capital Budget which is scheduled to be presented to the Blythe City Council for adoption at its regularly scheduled meeting of June 22, 2010. Please present this material to your commission in the City's behalf. If you should have any questions, please direct them to Mr. Jim Rodkey, Public Works Director at (760) 922-6161, extension 240. a L 4 /1),,,t7 Helen Colbert Director of Finance xc: David Lane, City Manager Jim Rodkey, Public Works Director Measure "A" Project File CITY OF BLYTHE MEASURE "A" PROJECT STATUS REPORT PROJECT Hobsonway Reconstruction Wheel Chair/ADA Curb Ramps Alleyway Improvements Asphalt/Base Materials Fog & Chip Seal Sidewalk & Street Improvements Combined Streets Project Traffic Signals Rehabilitation Hobsonway Reconstruction Grind & Overlay Project DESCRIPTION Engineering/Construction (Phase 2) Completed 77% Completed/Install ADA Ramps On going Annual Improvements Annual Stock pile for Street Improvements Street Improvements on Various City Streets City Sidewalk Improvements Annual Street Improvements Rehabilitation/Traffic Signals Annual Rehab Completed Engineering/Construction (Phase 3) Engineering Complete Grind and Overlay various city streets EXP. COMP. 2009/10 1998/15 2009/15 2009/15 2009/15 2010/11 2009/15 2009/10 2009/ 11 2010/11 CITY OF BLYTHE MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CALCULATION MEASURE "A" 2009/10 2010 Current year local discretionary expenditures $ 662,644 Less: Base Year Excess if current year expenditures over Base Year Excess local expenditures at beginning of year Excess local expenditures at end of year (475,677) 186,967 4,709,504 $4,896,471 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned hereby agrees and certifies for the City of Blythe (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A°) shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction of loss of Measure A funds. Dated: June 10, 2010 Jig" Rodkey blic Wo`Director ATTEST: tvv-. `. Mallory Butterfield City Clerk RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE '"A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2011 Agency: City of Blythe Prepared By. Helen Colbert Phone No.: (760) 922-6161 Date: June 10, 2010 Page 1 of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000'S) 1 2010/11 Traffic Signals/Rehabilitation $65 $65 2 2010/11 Administrative Overhead $100 $100 3 2010/11 Sidewalk Improvements $50 $50 4 1998/15 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) (50,000/yr) $1,000 $50 5 6 7 8 9 2010/11 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) 2010/11 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project 2004/15 Hobsonway/CVAG Loan Payment (Phase 1) 2010/11 Hobsonway Design & Reconstruction (Phase 3) 2010/11 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements $175 $150 $2,400 $1,000 $50 $175 $150 $250 $1,000 $50 10 11 2009/15 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment 2010/11 Grind and Overlay/City Streets 12 2010M 2 Fog, Chip, and Slurry Seal $2,400 $1,226 $100 $240 $1,226 $100 $3,456 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE"A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 Agency: City of Blythe Prepared By; Helen Colbert Phone No.: (760) 922-6161 Date: June 10, 2010 Page 2 of 5 ITEM NO, PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE "A" !FUNDS ($000'S) 1 2 3 1998/15 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) (50,0001yr) 2011/12 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements 2011/12 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal $1,000 $100 $100 $50 $100 $100 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2004/15 Hobsonway/CVAG Loan Payment (Phase 1) 2012/14 Hobsonway Reconstruction (Phase 4) 2011/12 Administrative Overhead 2011/15 Asphalt Emulsion OII/Base Material (Annual Stock) 2009/15 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment 2011/12 Traffic Signal Rehabilitation 2011/12 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project $2,400 $2,000 $100 $175 $2,400 $65 $150 $250 $2,000 $100 $175 $240 $65 $150 $3,230 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A LOCAL; FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2013 Agency: Prepared By: Phone No.: Date: City of Blythe Helen Colbert (760) 922-6161 June 10, 2010 Page 3 of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000'S) 1 1998/15 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) (50,000/yr) $1,000 $50 2 2012/13 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements $100 $100 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2012/13 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) 2012/13 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project 2012/13 Administrative Overhead 2004/15 Hobsonway/CVAG Loan Payment (Phase 1) 2012/14 Hobsonway Reconstruction (Phase 4) 2009/15 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment 2012/13 Traffic Signal Rehabilitation $175 $100 $100 $2,400 $2,000 $2,400 $75 $175 $100 $100 $250 $2,000 $240 $75 $3,090 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM. FISCAL YEAR 2014. Agency: City of Blythe Prepared By: Helen Colbert Phone No.. (760) 922-6161 Date: June 10, 2010 Page 4 of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000'S) 1998/15 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) (50,000/yr) $1,000 $50 2 3 4 5 6 T 8 2004/15 Hobsonway/CVAG Loan Payment (Phase 1) 2012/14 Hobsonway Reconstruction (Phase 4) 2013I14 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements 2013/14 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) 2013/14 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project 2013I14 Administrative Overhead 2009/15 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment $2,400 $2,000 $100 $175 $100 $100 $2,400 $250 $2,000 $100 $175 $100 $100 $240 $3,015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2015 Agency: Prepared By: Phone No.: Date: City of Blythe Helen Colbert (760) 922-6161 June 10, 2010 Page 5 of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE '"A" FUNDS ($000'S) 1 2 2004/15 Hobsonway/CVAG Loan Payment (Phase 1) 2014/15 Alleyway Improvements/Annual improvements $2,400 $100 $250 $100 3 4 5 6 7 2014/15 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) 2014/15 Combined Streets Annual Improvement Project 2014/15 Administrative Overhead 2014/15 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment 2014/15 Fog, Chip and Slurry Seal $175 $150 $100 $2,400 $200 $175 $150 $100 $240 $200 $1,215 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2011 - 2015 11111111111.1.11.11111111111.10111.1.1.11.. 111111111111111111111 1.1.1 11111.1111111. MIN11111111 1111111111111 1.1111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1111111 MI1111111111111111 2°11 Ell 11111111111 2°12 Ill. 1111111111 11111 2°13 1111.11 1.1111. 2°14 11111111111111 11111111 2°15 1111111111 GRAND TOTAL: TOTAL PER YR 3,456,000 3,230,000 3,090,000 3,015,000 1,215,000 14,006,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2010 to 2011 Agency: City of Calimesa Page __1__of __1__: Prepared by: Carlos Zamano Phone Number: (909) 795-9804 Date: May 28, 2010 Item No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs Measure A Funds 1 Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, & reconstruction projects on an annual basis—Prop 1B Funding $440,000 $44,000 2 Pavement reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard Rehabilitate Pavement on Avenue “L” after the completion of the storm drainage project—STP local monies $82,000 $14,000 3 Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood Avenue Landscape Calimesa Boulevard with additional planters, trees, decorative lighting, and gazebo shades as required---Transportation Enhancement Grant $385,000 $33,000 4 Calimesa Boulevard and County Line Road Intersection improvements, west to the Interstate 10 Freeway Work with pre-planning conceptual design, water agency legal requirements, etc. prior to widening intersection of County Line Road and Calimesa Boulevard, re-establish potable water well— DEMOSTL grant monies $65,000 $65,000 5 Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project from County Line Road to Avenue “L” (Project is scheduled to go to bid on July 13, 2010) Construct sidewalk and related incidental storm drainage facilities to facilitate to-and-from school pedestrian safety--- TCSPPP-CALTRANS grant $1,106,000 $235,000 6 Desert Lawn Drive and Cherry Valley Boulevard Widening Work with pre-planning and/or pre-design conceptual work for additional street widening and safety construction, involving new paving, right- of-way, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, signals, etc. $3,375,000 $75,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2011 to 2012 Agency: City of Calimesa Page __1__of __1__: Prepared by: Carlos Zamano Phone Number: (909) 795-9804 Date: May 28, 2010 Item No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs Measure A Funds 1 Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, & reconstruction projects on an annual basis— $43,000 $34,000 2 Pavement reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard Observe rehabilitated pavement on Avenue “L” after the completion of the storm drainage project— STP local monies $65,000 $15,000 3 Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood Avenue Re-slurry or fog-seal street, maintain all electrically decorated trees and gazebo shades as required $65,000 $31,000 4 Calimesa Boulevard and County Line Road Intersection improvements, west to the Interstate 10 Freeway Acquire right-of-way to widen intersection of County Line Road and Calimesa Boulevard, acquire new lot on which to re-establish a potable water well—DEMOSTL grant monies $1,791,000 $690,000 5 Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project from County Line Road to Avenue “L” (Project should be completed by November 1, 2010) Observe sidewalk and related incidental storm drainage facilities for settlement and/or cracking issues. $8,000 $5,000 6 Desert Lawn Drive and Cherry Valley Boulevard Widening Start street widening and safety construction, involving new paving, right- of-way, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, signals, and signage, etc. $3,000,000 $599,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2012 to 2013 Agency: City of Calimesa Page __1__of __1__: Prepared by: Carlos Zamano Phone Number: (909) 795-9804 Date: May 28, 2010 Item No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs Measure A Funds 1 Various streets city wide Slurry seal, & reconstruction projects. If decided upon, use eco-friendly rubberized asphalt on future projects. $65,000 $40,000 2 Pavement reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard Fog seal rehabilitated pavement on Avenue “L” after the completion of the storm drainage project $42,000 $20,000 3 Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood Avenue Observe and note deficiencies in the landscaping and lighting on Calimesa Boulevard. Remove graffiti as req’d. $13,000 $8,000 4 Calimesa Boulevard and County Line Road Intersection improvements, west to the Interstate 10 Freeway Widen intersection of County Line Road and Calimesa Boulevard, re- establish potable water well—DEMOSTL grant monies $426,000 $26,000 5 Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project from County Line Road to Avenue “L” Fog seal paving and repair incidental damage/wear on sidewalks and related storm drainage facilities. Remove graffiti as required. $55,000 $40,000 6 Desert Lawn Drive and Cherry Valley Boulevard Widening Complete additional street widening and safety construction, involving new paving, right-of-way, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, signals, and signage $300,000 $30,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2013 to 2014 Agency: City of Calimesa Page __1__of __1__: Prepared by: Carlos Zamano Phone Number: (909) 795-9804 Date: May 28, 2010 Item No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs Measure A Funds 1 Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, & reconstruction projects on an annual basis. Study construction needed to improve traffic flows. $152,000 $112,000 2 Pavement reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard Observe previous pavement protection measures on Avenue “L” after the completion of the storm drainage project. $10,000 $5,000 3 Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood Avenue Observation and graffiti removal on landscaping, lighting, and gazebos on Calimesa Boulevard $155,000 $15,000 4 Calimesa Boulevard and County Line Road Intersection improvements, west to the Interstate 10 Freeway Slurry seal intersection of County Line Road and Calimesa Boulevard. Re- stripe as req’d. DEMOSTL grant monies $190,000 $90,000 5 Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project from County Line Road to Avenue “L” Fog seal paving work along Third Street. Remove graffiti and repair incidental vandalism, etc. $42,000 $20,000 6 Desert Lawn Drive and Cherry Valley Boulevard Widening Observe and re-stripe paving as required. Re-time traffic signals as required to enhance traffic flow and reduce pollution $55,000 $25,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2014 to 2015 Agency: City of Calimesa Page __1__of __1__: Prepared by: Carlos Zamano Phone Number: (909) 795-9804 Date: May 28, 2010 Item No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs Measure A Funds 1 Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, & reconstruction projects on an annual basis—Prop 1B Funding $100,000 $44,000 2 Pavement reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard Observe durability of rubberized asphalt slurry seal Avenue “L” after the completion of the storm drainage project $55,000 $25,000 3 Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood Avenue Re-slurry seal and re-stripe Calimesa Boulevard. Repair planter irrigation and lighting systems as required. $75,000 $50,000 4 Calimesa Boulevard and County Line Road Intersection improvements, west to the Interstate 10 Freeway Test and review durability of rubberized asphalt. Remove graffiti and repair vandalism at intersection of County Line Road and Calimesa Boulevard. $100,000 $45,000 5 Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project from County Line Road to Avenue “L” Chip seal paving on Third Street to protect original street surface. $145,000 $45,00 6 Desert Lawn Drive and Cherry Valley Boulevard Widening Chip seal new paving, repair signage and striping as required. Remove graffiti as required. $275,000 $75,000 908 Park Avenue Calimesa, California 92320 ● (909) 795-9801 City Of Calimesa Project Progress Report Calimesa City Street Maintenance Program May 28, 2010 The City of Calimesa has an aggressive and on-going pavement management and protection program. The City of Calimesa is unique in that the City is small enough so the Public Works Director can personally inspect the streets and the related streetscape “furniture” for decay and faults. Due to the personalized nature of this inspection, it is currently not possible to list exactly what streets will be scheduled for fog seal, slurry seal, or chip seal in any given fiscal year. However, it is possible to say that the streets in the best condition in any given fiscal year will be given the attention needed to keep them as the “best streets” while the streets that need reconstruction will be reconstructed as the larger budget allows. Pavement Reconstruction on Avenue “L” between Fourth Street and Calimesa Boulevard May 28, 2010 This project is currently on “hold” until the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District completes a major addition to their pipeline system under Avenue “L”. It is anticipated that the initial pavement reconstruction will begin late in Fiscal Year 2010/2011. This will not be an ongoing project once the asphalt overlay is completed. However, based on current civil engineering pavement management theories, this reconstruction will receive aggressive pavement maintenance to ensure its longevity. Calimesa Boulevard Landscape Project Status Report Calimesa Boulevard from Avenue “L” to Sandalwood May 28, 2010 This project is currently in the design stage, with an expanded study on the possibility of piping/covering Calimesa Creek. The study is checking the feasibility of converting the old Calimesa Creek alignment into an avian preserve and/or a xeriscape demonstration garden for local native specie exhibits. The current environmental review is moving smoothly with no anticipated delays. The local businesses are hopeful this project will go out to bid soon with the actual 908 Park Avenue Calimesa, California 92320 ● (909) 795-9801 construction beginning late in the 2009/2010 Fiscal Year. Completion will occur in Fiscal Year 2011/2012. County Line Road/Calimesa Boulevard Intersection Improvement Project Status Report May 28, 2010 The County Line Road/Calimesa Boulevard Improvement is very much a needed project within the City; however, it is also a project that is fraught with problems. The are ongoing discussions internally among the City Staff about how to deal with the right-of-way acquisition issues on County Line Road, construction near a “blue line” stream, and the relocation of an active City well. The California Department of Fish and Game has been contacted as part of the aforementioned study on the feasibility of piping/covering Calimesa Creek. This project will not start before late in Fiscal Year 2011/2012. The street improvement portion of the project itself is not expected to take longer than six months to complete. The bridge (culvert) widening on Calimesa Boulevard will be done concurrently with County Line Road Street improvements but this aspect of the construction may take longer than six months to complete. The relocation and drilling of the replacement well will undoubtedly be done independently of the street and bridge improvement work on an unknown time frame dictated by the local water agency. (Currently, CALTRANS is reinforcing the Interstate 10 overcrossing at County Line Road; this work will benefit our road widening project.) Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement, Segment 1 May 28, 2010 The plans and the specifications for the Third Street Pedestrian Enhancement Project have been completed and are ready for bid advertisement. Currently CALTRANS is reviewing the plans, the specifications, and the contract documents as part of their Request for Authorization for Construction (RFA— Construction) process. The City of Calimesa anticipates this project will be completed by November 1, 2010. Most of the right-of-entry permits necessary for some on the construction have been re-verified as valid (e.g., the same property owner) with verification of the remaining few outstanding unverified right-of-entry permits being actively pursued. CALTRANS has approved the various phases of the environmental documents. 908 Park Avenue Calimesa, California 92320 ● (909) 795-9801 Cherry Valley Boulevard/Desert Lawn Drive Improvements May 28, 2010 With the unprecedented collapse of subdivision financing in 2008, the City of Calimesa is currently studying and discussing how best to widen and improve the existing streets south of Interstate 10 to facilitate an approved commercial development that has been delayed due to financial reasons. Even though the development can be served with the existing streets, the traffic generation potential of this development will warrant a “fast track” approach to completing the project when the various studies are completed. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (--1 IThe undersigned agrees and certifies for � kl d�t' i �cia.)l\i\rY (-1(the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: , Ovve, A' , 201 O CITY MANAGE ATITEST: s - - SECRETARY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAMFY 2011 - 2015Agency: City of Canyon LakePage 1 of 1Prepared by: Habib MotlaghPhone #:(951) 943-6504Date: 2/24/2010ItemTotal Cost Measure ANo.Project Name / Limits Project Type($000's)Funds ($000's)1 Rehabilitation and Widening of Pavement Replacement, Widening, 6,000 * 623Railroad Canyon Road Signal Modification, Striping, UtilityRelocation, Median Improvements*City may request advane of Fundsto deliver the project in FY 2010/11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010-11 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Sheila McGrath-Hibdon, Engineering Financial Analyst Phone #: (760) 770-0319 Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name / Limits Total Cost Item No. Capital Projects Project Type ($000’s) Measure A ($000’s) 1 Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy. 2,172.6 1,021.1 2 Engineering & Planning Departments Transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as highway design and related engineering activities. 1,983.0 356.9 3 Risk Management Traffic related claims management. 2,322.6 46.7 4 Traffic Signal Maintenance (on-going maintenance agreement) Maintenance of traffic signal system. 600.1 120.0 5 Capital Improvement Projects (on-going and proposed projects) Various Traffic / transportation related projects. 9,059.9 881.3 $ 16,148.2 $ 2,426.0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011-12 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Sheila McGrath-Hibdon, Engineering Financial Analyst Phone #: (760) 770-0319 Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name / Limits Total Cost Item No. Capital Projects Project Type ($000’s) Measure A ($000’s) 1 Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy. 2,237.7 1,051.8 2 Engineering & Planning Departments Transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as highway design and related engineering activities. 2,042.6 367.7 3 Risk Management Traffic related claims management. 2,402.6 48.1 4 Traffic Signal Maintenance (on-going maintenance agreement) Maintenance of traffic signal system. 618.0 123.6 5 Capital Improvement Projects (on-going and proposed projects) Various Traffic / transportation related projects. 6,366.9 415.5 $ 13,637.9 $ 2,006.5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012-13 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Sheila McGrath-Hibdon, Engineering Financial Analyst Phone #: (760) 770-0319 Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name / Limits Total Cost Item No. Capital Projects Project Type ($000’s) Measure A ($000’s) 1 Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy. 2,304.9 1,083.3 2 Engineering & Planning Departments Transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as highway design and related engineering activities. 2,103.9 378.7 3 Risk Management Traffic related claims management. 2,474.7 49.5 4 Traffic Signal Maintenance (on-going maintenance agreement) Maintenance of traffic signal system. 636.6 127.3 5 Capital Improvement Projects (on-going and proposed projects) Various Traffic / transportation related projects. 18,964.2 25.1 $ 26,484.3 $ 1,664.0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013-14 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Sheila McGrath-Hibdon, Engineering Financial Analyst Phone #: (760) 770-0319 Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name / Limits Total Cost Item No. Capital Projects Project Type ($000’s) Measure A ($000’s) 1 Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy. 2,374.0 1,115.8 2 Engineering & Planning Departments Transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as highway design and related engineering activities. 2,167.0 390.0 3 Risk Management Traffic related claims management. 2,499.5 50.0 4 Traffic Signal Maintenance (on-going maintenance agreement) Maintenance of traffic signal system. 643.0 128.6 5 Capital Improvement Projects (on-going and proposed projects) Various Traffic / transportation related projects. 24,983.2 11.7 $ 32,666.7 $ 1,696.1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE “A” LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014-15 Agency: City of Cathedral City Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Sheila McGrath-Hibdon, Engineering Financial Analyst Phone #: (760) 770-0319 Date: June 21, 2010 Project Name / Limits Total Cost Item No. Capital Projects Project Type ($000’s) Measure A ($000’s) 1 Public Works Department & Parks Maintenance City wide maintenance operations including parking, median maintenance and street light energy. 2,445.2 1,149.3 2 Engineering & Planning Departments Transportation and traffic related planning and development activities as well as highway design and related engineering activities. 2,232.0 401.8 3 Risk Management Traffic related claims management. 2,524.4 50.5 4 Traffic Signal Maintenance (on-going maintenance agreement) Maintenance of traffic signal system. 649.4 130.0 5 Capital Improvement Projects (on-going and proposed projects) Various Traffic / transportation related projects. 12,226.3 11.7 $ 20,077.4 $ 1,743.1 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2009-2010 PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 21, 2010 OPERATIONS: 156-8301 Measure A Expended to Date:88,413$ 161-xxxx Measure A Expended to Date:692,749$ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: ONGOING PROJECTS CIP No. 1002 Perez Road Pavement Rehabiliation. This project is now complete Total Project Budget:(1,505,180)$ Measure A Allocation:(282,382)$ Measure A Expended To Date:282,382$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:-$ 1003 Total Project Budget: $ (2,525,000) Measure A Allocation:(1,226,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:552,507$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(673,493)$ 1010 Total Project Budget: $ (132,986,000) Measure A Allocation:(433,334)$ Measure A Expended To Date:391,899$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(41,435)$ 1011 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (344,290) Total Allocated Measure A:(50,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:-$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(50,000)$ The following projects, programs and operations were listed in prior Five-Year Plans and Project Status Reports, have been added as new projects, have been cancelled or amended. All Operations and Capital Projects utilize a combination of Measure A and other funding sources. The following figures are un-audited and reflect expenditures through June 02, 2010. Traffic Signal Maintenance Annual Contract: The City has a contract with Honeywell to perform signal maintenance of its 46 traffic signals. City Public Works Department operations, including parkway and median maintenance and street lighting charges. Agua Caliente School and Dream Homes Area Curb Ramps: The project will provide for the installation of ADA barrier free access to Agua Caliente School Ramon Road Widening East of Date Palm: To widen and rehabilitate Ramon Road, east of Date Palm to the east City limits. This project will be complete during during FY 10/11. DaVall / I-10 Interchange: Construct new regional arterial improvement including: the widening of Da Vall Rd. from 2 to 6 lanes between Dinah Shore and Ramon Rd., widening from 2 to 6 lanes from Ramon Rd to McCallum Way, widening from 2 to 6 lanes from McCallum Way to Ave. 30, construct new 6-lane road Ave. 30 to I-10, and construct new 6-lane road I-10 to Varner Rd. This project is part of CVAG's Transportation Project Prioritization Study and is expected to begin construction during FY 2020 and is currently in the PID phase. An additional $91,494 in FY09 Measure A funding overages from CIP 1001, 1002, 2505, 8687, 8930 and 8941 was reallocated to this project during FY 09/10. Pg. 1 of 5 Updated 06/21/2010 Cathedral City Status Report FY 09/10 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2009-2010 PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 21, 2010 1013 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (239,560,000) Total Allocated Measure A:(40,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:26,060$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(13,940)$ 1014 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (176,533) Total Allocated Measure A:(22,769)$ Measure A Expended To Date:11,070$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(11,699)$ 1015 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (755,328) Total Allocated Measure A:(282,328)$ Measure A Expended To Date:282,328$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:-$ 1016 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (1,000,000) Total Allocated Measure A:(114,700)$ Measure A Expended To Date:1,672$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(113,028)$ 2012 Total Project Budget: $ (42,912,064) Measure A Allocation:(50,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:-$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(50,000)$ 2500 Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (476,320) Total Allocated Measure A:(238,160)$ Measure A Expended To Date:13,769$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(224,391)$ 2512 Total Project Budget: $ (597,000) Measure A Allocation:(50,560)$ Measure A Expended To Date:20,227$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(30,333)$ Edom Hill Truck Climbing Lane: Climbing lane from Varner Rd. northerly for 4,700 linear feet as required by an agreement with Riverside Integrated Waste Management Bureau (IWMB). Landau / I-10 Interchange: To prepare the Project Initiation Document and other preliminary studies and documents necessary to construct a new 6-lane mixes flow, partial cloverleaf interchange iwth auxillary lanes and 4-two lane ramps, plus a 6-lane grade separation bridge over the UPRR tracks, including the widening of Landau Blvd. between Vista Chino and Varner Road. Cove Assessment District: This is an on-going project for sanitary sewer, street and other improvements in the Cove Area of Cathedral City. The second phase of this project is expected to be completed 07/2010. Perez Road Sewers: Necessary to eliminate septic tanks in compliance with State mandate. Sanitary sewer plans are complete and shelf ready; a funding strategy is currently being developed to construct the sewer improvements. Varner Road and Date Palm Drive Shoulder Stabilization: This project is to provide PM10 soil stabilization to reduce blowsand track-out onto City streets. Ramon Road at Whitewater River Bridge Widening: Necessary to eliminate lane restriction for capacity and safety, as well as a land deficiency, and to improve the structure efficiency rating. Lead agency may be Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) as an HBRR Indian Land project. Total estimated project cost is $10,000,000, of which $500,000 is Measure A funds. Anticipated timeframe to project completion is five years. Cathedral Canyon / Terrace Road: For the construction of missing sidewalks along Cathedral Canyon and Terrace Roads. Project to be completed during FY 09/10. Pg. 2 of 5 Updated 06/21/2010 Cathedral City Status Report FY 09/10 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2009-2010 PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 21, 2010 2513 Total Project Budget: $ (198,850) Measure A Allocation:(45,425)$ Measure A Expended To Date:9,317$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(36,108)$ 3522 Total Project Budget: $ (590,324) Measure A Allocation:(52,266)$ Measure A Expended To Date:52,266$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:-$ 6507 Total Project Budget: $ (48,419) Measure A Allocation:(48,419)$ Measure A Expended To Date:48,419$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:-$ 7011 Total Project Budget: $ (1,350,000) Measure A Allocation:(30,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:-$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(30,000)$ 8645 Total Project Budget: $ (81,350) Measure A Allocation:(25,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:1,827$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(23,173)$ 8670 Total Project Budget: $ (21,500,000) Measure A Allocation:(50,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:23,398$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(26,602)$ Whitewater Neighborhood Sidewalk Improvements: For infill sidewalks necessary to turn existing dirt, grass and native pathways within the Whitewater neighborhood between Dinah Shore Drive and Ramon Road into ADA compliant concrete sidewalks, driveway approaches and curb ramps. Whitewater Channel Bike Trail, Phas I, II & III: This project is to design and construct a Class I Bikeway along the eastside of the Whitewater Channel from Vista Chino Dr. to 30th Ave., and along both sides of 30th Ave. from the Whitewater Channel to Landau Bl. as well as along the eastside of the Whitewater Channel from 30th Ave. to Ramon Rd., and along both sides of Ramon Rd. from Whitewater Channel to Cathedral Canyon Dr. The final phase is along the eastside of the Whitewater Channel from Ramon Rd. to Dinah Shore Dr., and along both sides of Dinah Shore Dr. from the Whitewater Channel to Cathedral Canyon Dr. Date Palm Widening and Bridge Repair (N. of I-10 to Varner Rd. including Longs Creek Canyon Bridge): Project to include the widening of Date Palm, Long Canyon Creek Bridge, traffic signal at Verner Road and ROW acquisition in support of the Date Palm / I-10 Interchange project. Clean Streets Management: To provide for the on-going reduction of entrained road dust emissions as part of the City's arterial and auxiliary street maintenance and as part of the City's systematic approach in maintaining compliance with PM-10 standards. Alternative funding for FY11 has been secured and Measure funds will no longer be utilized. Other Corridor Signal Studies: A completed project to plan and/or implement traffic impact, signal timing and synchronization, traffic count, speed and other traffic related signal studies towards improving traffic flow, congestion and life expectancy to the City's arterial roadways and collector streets. Drainage Basins: On-going activities to acquire and construct retention/detention basins to prevent street flooding. Pg. 3 of 5 Updated 06/21/2010 Cathedral City Status Report FY 09/10 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2009-2010 PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 21, 2010 8691 Total Project Budget: $ (4,942,650) Measure A Allocation:(250,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:249,543$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(457)$ 8835 Total Project Budget: $ (38,006) Measure A Allocation:(17,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:1,416$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(15,584)$ 8915 Total Project Budget: $ (236,683) Measure A Allocation:(97,780)$ Measure A Expended To Date:87,473$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(10,307)$ 8919 Total Project Budget: $ (22,118,033) Measure A Allocation:(192,933)$ Measure A Expended To Date:100,876$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(92,057)$ 8921 Total Project Budget: $ (8,250,525) Measure A Allocation:(80,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:80,000$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:-$ 8946 Total Project Budget: $ (115,600) Measure A Allocation:(115,600)$ Measure A Expended To Date:3,609$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(111,991)$ 8988 Total Project Budget: $ (3,551,135) Measure A Allocation:(160,000)$ Measure A Expended To Date:153,786$ Measure A to Carry Forward to FY 2011:(6,214)$ Date Palm / Varner Road Blowsand Abatement Windfences: For the installation of windfences on Date Palm Dr. from I-10 to Varner Rd. and along Varner Rd. from Date Palm Dr. northerly to the west City limits. E. Palm Canyon Bridge Widening at the West Cathedral Canyon Channel: To design and construct a widened bridge structure and approach lane to accommodate six lanes and sidewalks on the bridge. Construction of this project is expected to be completed within two years. Ramon Road West: Over the next three years this project will beautify and improve the Ramon Road corridor, increase traffic flow and reduce congestion. Ramon Road Median Islands: On-going project to construct and landscape median islands at various locations in Ramon Road. Cove Drainage: To construct storm drains in the upper and lower portions of the Cathedral City Cove area necessary to protect the Downtown core from a 100-year flood hazard. The project has 12 systems and was in two phases: Phase 1 is complete, Phase 2 is anticipated to be completed July 2010. Cathedral Canyon Bridge Whitewater Low Flow Crossing: To construct a new 4-lane bridge on Cathedral Canyon Dr. at the Whitewater River Channel to eliminate a low flow crossing. Design phase in anticipated during FY2010, ROW acquisition FY2011; construction is estimated to be completed during FY2012. ADA Compliance: For the on-going construction of access ramps and other disabled access improvements on public streets and sidewalks. Pg. 4 of 5 Updated 06/21/2010 Cathedral City Status Report FY 09/10 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2009-2010 PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 21, 2010 CAPITAL PROJECTS PENDING COUNCIL APPROVAL: PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (132,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(47,500)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (750,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(86,025)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (15,000,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(1,720,500)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (1,400,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(160,580)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ 2,700,000 Total Requested Measure A Allocation:309,690$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (2,300,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(263,810)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (600,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(68,820)$ PENDING Total Proposed Project Budget: $ (250,000,000) Total Requested Measure A Allocation:(28,675,000)$ South City Improvement District: This project will provide for sewers and streets in five areas north of the Whitewater River necessary to eliminate septic systems in the south city area and is expected to take five years to complete. Varner Road Traffic Signals: This project is necessary as a requirement of an agreement with Riverside IWMB and will include signals at Date Palm, Mountain View and Edom Hill. The project is estimated to be completed in two years. I-10 Infrastructure Study: On-going study to develop long range fees needed to provide infrastructure north of I-10. Total project cost is estimated at $132,000, of which $47,500 is Measure A funds. Varner Road Widening - Palm Drive to East City Limits E. Palm Canyon Road Widening - West of Cree Road E. Palm Canyon Road Widening - West of Perez Road E. Palm Canyon Road Widening - Between Sangate and Rancho Mirage city limits Cathedral Canyon Drive Rehabilitation at Dinah Shore Drive Pg. 5 of 5 Updated 06/21/2010 Cathedral City Status Report FY 09/10 89092 TT, SM 4 1 1515 SIXTH STREET COACHELLA, CA 92236 Fax: (760) 398-8117 May 5, 2010 Ms. Shirley Medina Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 3580 University Avenue, Suite 111 Riverside, California 92507 Subject: Dear Shirley, Administration 398-3502 Animal Control 398-4978 Building 398-3002 City Clerk 398-3502 City Council 398-3502 Code Enforcement 398-4978 Economic Develop. 398-3502 Engineering 398-5744 Finance 398-3502 Fire 398-8895 Capital Improvement Plan - Measure "A" Projects Fiscal Year 2010-2014 Grants 398-3502 Neighborhood Sys. 398-4978 Personnel 398-3502 Planning 398-3102 Public Works 398-5744 Recreation 398-3502 Riverside Sheriffs Office 863-8990 Sanitary 391-5008 Senior Sys. 398-0104 Utilities 398-2702 Attached is the City of Coachella's Capital Improvement Plan for Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest thousand. Also attached is the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) certification and information as per the City's independent accounting report. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mark Chappell of my staff, or me. Mark can be reached at (760) 398-5744 ext. 181, and I can be reached at (760) 398-5744 ext. 134. Sincerely, Tony J. ucero, P.E. City Engineer cc: Gene Rogers , Interim City Manager Paul Toor, Director of Public Works Richard Acevedo, Interim Finance Director Mark Chappell, Senior Civil Engineer Attachments X.29.24 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2071 Agency: City of Coachella Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: T. Lucero Phone #: 760.398.5744 Date: 04/07/10 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 2 3 4 Van Buren Street South of Avenue 48 Frederick Street South of Avenue 49 Dillon Road South of Avenue 44 Enterprise Way South of Avenue 52 Reconstruct Reconstruct Overlay Reconstruct $200 $180 $50 $180 $489 SUBTOTAL = $610 $489 Pre print/usersham easureA 5yrform TOTALS $610 $489 1MeasACFP.20010.11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Coachella Page 1 of 4 Prepared by: T. Lucero Phone #:760.398.5744 Date: 04107\/10 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) FY 20011-12 1 Naomi Court From La Ponderosa to East End Reconstruct $147 $147 2 Perez Street From Naomi Ct. to La Hernandez Reconstruct $160 $160 3 Romaulda Court Perez Street to La Hernandez East End Reconstruct $25 $25 4 Ortiz Street From Perez St. to La Hernandez Reconstruct $68 $68 SUBTOTAL = $400 $400 Prep n nt/usershi/ measureA 5yrform MeasACFP.20011.12 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Coachella Page 2 of 4 Prepared by: T. Lucero Phone #: 760.398.5744 Date: 04/07/10 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) FY 20012-13 5 Avenida De Platina Reconstruct $85 $85 From Ave. 50 to Via Conchilla 6 Via Conchilla Reconstruct $42 $21 From Avenida De Plata to Avenida De Platina 7 Avenida De Oro Reconstruct $240 $240 From Ave. 50 to Guitron Street Reconstruct $168 $168 8 Avenida Cortez From Avenue 50 to Calle Leon 9 Calle Leon Reconstruct $64 $64 From Calle Vega to Avenida Cortez SUBTOTAL = $599 $578 reprint/users/ri/measureA 5yrform 1MeasACFP.20012.13 RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Coachella Page 3 of 4 Prepared by: T. Lucero Phone #:760.398.5744 Date: 04/07/10 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($ 000's) FY 20013-14 10 Calle Vega Reconstruct $53 $45 From Calle Leon to Paseo Laredo 11 Paseo De Laredo From Frederick to Avenida Reconstruct $88 $88 Cortez 12 Via Durango From Avenida Coez to End Reconstruct $59 $59 SUBTOTAL = $200 $192 reprint )users /n measure A5yrform \MeasACFP.20013.14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Coachella Page 4 of 4 Prepared by: T. Lucero Phone #:760.398.5744 Date: 04/07/10 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) FY 20014-15 13 Via Hermosa From Avenida Cortez to Reconstruct $59 $59 End 14 Vera Cruz From Avenida Cortez to Reconstruct $59 $59 15 End Frederick Street Reconstruct $260 $260 From Avenue 50 to Avenue 16 49 Reconstruct $1,008 $559 Avenue 49 From Harrison to Van Buren SUBTOTAL = $1,386 $937 reps nt/usersl n I measure y orm TOTALS $2,585 $2,107 MeasACFP.20011.15 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for C ' arc cd,A ch#A-c,c.,d. (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: s��j , 2010 U:4( CITY MANAGE N:12x/ ATTEST: SECRETARY CITY OF COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA Report on Agreed -Upon Procedures Applied to the Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Year Ended June 30, 2009 MHM Mayer Hoffman McCann R.C. An Independent CPA Firm 2301 Dupont Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92612 949-474-2020 ph 949-263-5520 ix _. ..... ...... ..... _... ._.. www.mhm-pc.com Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, Califomia INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON APPLYING AGREED -UPON PROCEDURES We have performed the procedures enumerated below, which were agreed to by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), solely to assist RCTC in determining whether the City of Coachella, Califomia (City) was in compliance with the Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program grant terms and conditions for the year ended June 30, 2009. The City's management is responsible for the accounting records. This agreed -upon procedures engagement was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The sufficiency of the procedures is solely the responsibility of those parties specified in the report. Consequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described below, either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other purpose. The procedures performed and the results of those procedures were as follows: 1. We reviewed the 1989 Measure A (Ordinance 88-1) compliance requirements. Although the 2009 Measure A (Ordinance 02-001) is not effective until July 1, 2009, Western County jurisdictions are required to participate in the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (fUMF) program, which is administered by the Westem Riverside Council of Govemments (WRCOG). Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 2. We obtained the City's approved Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (C1P) from RCTC for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 3. We obtained a detailed general ledger and balance sheet from the City for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. a. We identified the amount of Measure A cash and investments recorded at June 30, 2009. 1 L._ Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, Califomia Results: The City recorded Measure A cash and investments in the amount of $417,581 as of June 30, 2009. b. We identified amounts due from other funds. Results: There were no amounts due from other funds as of June 30, 2009. c. We identified reservations or designations of ending fund balance for the Measure A activity. Results: The City has recorded an unreserved Measure A fund balance of $508,398 as of June 30, 2009. d. We identified the existence of any restatement of Measure A fund balance and inquired of management as to the reason for any restatement. Results: The City has not restated Measure A fund balance. We obtained an operating statement for Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 (see Exhibit A), including budget amounts. a. We reviewed the revenues in the operating statement. i. We inquired of management as to what fund is used to record Measure A revenues received from RCTC for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, and documented what the total revenues were for the fiscal year. Results: The City accounts for Measure A revenue received from RCTC in its Local Transportation Fund (Fund #117). The City has recorded total revenues in the amount of $457,616 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. ii. We obtained a listing of Measure A payments made from RCTC to the City. We compared the Measure A revenue recorded by the City to the listing of payments made by RCTC. Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. iii. We determined the amount of interest allocated to the Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Results: The City allocated interest in the amount of $11,063 to the Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. b. We reviewed the expenditures in the operating statement. 2 Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California i. We inquired of management as to what fund is used to record Measure A expenditures and what the total expenditures were for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Results: The City accounts for Measure A expenditures in its Local Transportation Fund (Fund #117). The City has recorded total Measure A expenditures in the amount of $503,341 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. ii. We judgmentally selected at least 20% of total Measure A expenditures for testing. Results: The City recorded Measure A expenditures in the amount of $503,341. We selected $403,341 (80.13%) for testing. The expenditures consisted of transfers to other funds. 1. For the expenditures selected for testing, we compared the dollar amount recorded in the general ledger to the supporting documentation. Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 2. For the expenditures selected for testing, we reviewed the 5-Year CIP and noted whether the projects claimed were included in the 5-Year CIP and whether they constitute allowable costs. Results: The expenditures selected for testing were included in the 5-Year CIP and were allowable costs. No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. iii. We inquired of management as to the nature of any transfers recorded in the Measure A Fund. Results: The City transferred $503,341 to its Phase 6 Street Rehabilitation Project Fund, and $63,780 to Ave 50/Hwy 86 S Interchange Project. The transfer for the Phase 6 Street Rehabilitation Project Fund was included in the City's 5-year CIP. However, the Ave 50/Hwy 86 S Interchange Project transfer in the amount of $63,780 was not included in the City's 5-year CIP. This expenditure was subsequently reversed by the City. iv. We inquired of management as to the amount of indirect costs, if any, included in expenditures. Results: Per discussions with management and our review of the costs recorded in the general ledger, there were no indirect costs included in expenditures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. 3 Board of Commissioners Riverside County. Transportation Commission Riverside, Califomia 5. We compared the budgeted expenditures to actual amounts and inquired of management as to the nature of significant budget variances. Results: The following schedule compares the budgeted expenditures to actual amounts. Transfers out Budget Actual Variance $506.000 $503.341 $2.659 Totals $506,000 $503,341 $2.659 The variance was due to the actual project cost being less than budgeted. 6. We obtained a listing of jurisdictionswho participate in the Westem County or Coachella Valley TUMF programs from RCTC. a. if the jurisdiction is a participant in the TUMF program, we selected at least two disbursements for validation as to the amount remitted to WRCOG or Coachella Valley Association of Govemments (CVAG), as applicable. Results: The payments selected for testing indicated that TUMF is collected and remitted to CVAG, as required. b. We noted the total amount of TUMF fees collected and remitted during the fiscal year. Results: The total amount of TUMF fees collected and remitted during the fiscal year was $194,881. 7. We obtained the maintenance of effort (MOE) base year requirement from RCTC. a. We obtained a copy of schedule 3 from the annual Street Report. Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. b. We compared the amount of discretionary funds spent per the Street Report to the MOE base requirement. Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. c. Using the prior year's report, we added any current year MOE excess or deducted any current year MOE deficiency to the prior year carryover. Results: MOE activity is summarized as follows: 4 Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California MOE excess at July 1, 2008 $ 7.489.140 Current year local discretionary expenditures 2,708,830 Less MOE base year requirement (69,663) Excess MOE for fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 2,639,167 MOE excess at June 30, 2009 $10,128,307 We were not engaged to, and did not, conduct an audit, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion on the accounting records. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Riverside County Transportation Commission and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party. Irvine, Califomia November 5, 2009 5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA Summary of Revenues and Expenditures Year Ended June 30, 2009 (Unaudited) Budget Actual Variance Revenues: Measure A $ 700,000 $ 446,553 $ (253,447) Interest 5,290 11,063 5,773 Total revenues Expenditures: Transfers out Total expenditures 705,290 457,616 (247,674) 506,000 503,341 2,659 506,000 503,341 2,659 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures $ 199,290 $ (45,725) $ (245,015) Note: The above numbers were taken directly from the financial records of the City of Coachella and were not audited. 89081 TT, SM (951)739-4823 (951) 279-3627 (FAX) Kip @ci.corona.ca.us April 29, 2010 OFFICE OF: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 400 SOUTH VICENTIA AVENUE. P.O. BOX 940, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879-0940 CITY HALL - ON LINE ALL THE TIME (http://www.discovercorona.com) Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 nnD, IJI, ECE OVER MAY 0JM n rSPOR ATION COUNTY SUBJECT: MEASURE A FIVE YEAR PLAN AND PROJECT STATUS Enclosed is the Measure A proposed FY 2010/11 through 2014/15 Capital Improvements Plan, the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) signed certification statement, the Program Status Report for current fiscal year 2009/10 and the Measure A Annual Disbursement Projects received at the City. The City's minimum Maintenance of Effort is set at $1,784,399, however, as of June 30, 2010 the City would have spent $4,299,339 from Measure A and $6,085,806 from other funds to support Measure A project expenditures. The document supporting the MOE calculations can be found attached, entitled: "Calculation of Expenditure Level for Fiscal Year 2009/10." The Measure A proposed FY 2010/11 through 2014/15 Capital Improvement Plan is scheduled for submittal and review by our City Council during the Budget Workshop to be held on June 2, 2010. Adoption of the document is scheduled for June 16, 2010. If you have any questions please contact Kim Sitton at 951-279-3532. vm Kip D. Field, P.E. Public Works Director KF/DR Attachments c: Barbara Thierjung, Assistant Finance Director Kim Sitton, Accounting Supervisor X.29.07 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for The City of Corona (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: J 3 , 2010 ATTEST: obbins, City Manager PROJECT STATUS REPORT - MEASURE A CITY OF CORONA Item No., Project Name and Description Project No. Estimated Completion FY2009-10 Appropriations Status • 1. Advanced Traffic Management System - Phase 11 6243 November 2010 $8,264 Under Construction Implement advanced traffic management system, or ATMS, at various corridors/locations as per ATMS Master Plan and anticipated Federal Highways Administration, or FHWA approved scope. 2. Arterial Widening 7081 On -going $192,011 On -going Street widening in various areas throughout the City to complete the full width of street improvements. 3. Auto Center/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation 7115 On -going $1,251,000 Under Design - Estimate Completion September 2010 Right-of-way - Estimate Completion November 2010 Construct a four lane grade separation bridge at intersection of Auto Center Drive with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe grade crossing. 4. Citywide GIS Master Plan 7103 On -going $48,006 On -going Acquisition of hardware and software, data conversion and applications development to expand the existing Geographic Information System, or GIS, for Citywide implementation. 5. City Wide Traffic Model Update 6184 On -going $26,131 On -going Circulation element update. 6. Cota Bridge Widening 7112 On -going $50,000 On -going Bridge widening on Cota Street by the Corporation Yard. 7. Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Installation/Replacement 8027 On -going $741,670 On -going Repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drive approaches. Installation of missing sidewalk, curb, gutter, access ramps, bike paths, root pruning, engineering, and incidental work. 8. El Cerrito/1-15 Interim Interchange Improvements 6927 February 2009 $173,000 Complete Phase II: Reconstruct intersection and widen El Cerrito, 1-15 southbound off -ramp and northbound on -ramp in Caltrans right-of-way and construct two traffic signals at both ramps. Page 1 PROJECT STATUS REPORT - MEASURE A CITY OF CORONA Item No., Project Name and Description Project No. Estimated Completion FY2009-10 Appropriations Status 9. Local Street Widening, Curb and Gutter Improvements 7352 On -going $351,618 On -going Local streets widening and installation of curbs, gutters, driveways, and sidewalks. Miscellaneous curb and gutter repair and related work. 10. Magnolia/I-15 Freeway Corridor 7096 On -going $1,088,514 Under Design Improvements to the Magnolia Avenue/1-15 Freeway interchange to improve traffic flow. Ramp northbound, widening of the on ramp and widening Magnolia between both 1-15 Freeway ramps. 11. Malor Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement rehabilitation of various streets in accordance with the Pavement Management Program. 7080 On -going $2,508,437 On -going 12. McKinlev/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation 6937 On -going $536 On -going Project Study Report Phase Study to construct a new grade separation bridge at McKinley to eliminate congestion delays caused by increasing train traffic. 13. Ontario and Magnolia/Main Median Protect 6274 June 2010 $35,0o0 Under Construction Design and landscape of median, landscape, and hardscape. 14. Pavement Management Study 7069 On -going $28,880 On -going Field survey of local streets for inclusion into Micropaver to complete the street inventory and update of study for rehabilitation projects. 15. Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Pavement rehabilitation for local streets in accordance with the current pavement management study. Rehabilitation may include reconstruction paving, crack sealing, slurry, etc. Area limits are: AREA 1: Via Santiago, Border, Brentwood, and Avenida Del Vista. AREA 2: Sixth Street, Rimpau, Magnolia, and Fullerton. AREA 3: River Road, Auburndale, Rincon Street, and Corydon Street. AREA 4: Ontario, California, Foothill, and Main Street. 6921 On -going $4,826,776 On -going Page 2 PROJECT STATUS REPORT - MEASURE A CITY OF CORONA Item No., Project Name and Description Project No. Estimated Completion FY2009-10 Appropriations Status 16. Resurfacina and Pavement Maintenance 6922 On -going $300,270 On -going Resurface miscellaneous and repair potholes and pavement failures with City forces. 17. Sampson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement rehabilitation from Radio Road to 200 feet east of Granite Street, two lanes and paved median. 6267 January 2010 $315,000 Complete 18. Sidewalk. Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance 7073 On -going $476,585 On -going Repair or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drive approaches. Installation of missing sidewalk, curb, gutter, access ramps, bike paths, root pruning, engineering, and incidental work. 19. Sixth Street East Improvements 7107 January 2010 $391,562 Complete Design and construct landscape median on East Sixth Street from El Sobrante Road to the easterly city limits. Improve the East Sixth Street / El Camino intersection to ultimate improvements and install traffic signal. 20. Sixth Street Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement rehabilitation from Paseo Grande to West Grand Boulevard, four lanes and paved median. 6266 February 2010 $45,000 Complete 21. South Corona Master Planned Streets 8002 On -going $30,000 On -going Construction of master planned streets in South Corona. 22. City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational On -going $29,995 On -going TOTAL $12,918,255 Page 3 Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Dana Romeo Phone No:(951)279-3537 Date: March 18, 2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 Fiscal Year 2009-10 Estimated item No. Project Name/Limits - Project Type FY 2009-10 Appropriations Total Cost Expenditures CTD 3/18/10 Encumbrances CTD 3/18/10 Continuing Appropriations for FY2009-10 1 Advanced Traffic Management System Phase II Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 8,264 $ - $ 8,264 $ - 2 Arterial Widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways 192,011 - 49,950 142,061 3 Auto Center/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,251,000 13,251 61,121 1,176,628 4 Citywide GIS Master Plan Building, Facilities and Systems 48,006 1,323 - 46,683 5 Citywide Traffic Model Update Roads, Bridges and Freeways 26,131 - 11,487 14,644 6 Cote Bridge Widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways 50,000 - - 50,000 7 Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways 741,670 129,774 - 611,896 8 El Cerrito/I.15 Interim Interchange Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways 173,000 - - 173,000 9 Local Street Widening/Curb and Gutter Improvement Roads, Bridges and Freeways 351,618 - - 351,618 10 Magnolia/I.15 Freeway Corridor Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,088,514 33,041 150,562 904,911 11 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,908,437 18,482 1,113,068 776,887 12 McKinley/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 536 300 236 - 13 Ontario and Magnolia/Main Median Project Roads, Bridges and Freeways 35,000 13,156 - 21,844 14 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways 28,880 5,680 - 23,200 15 Pavement Rehabilitation Building, systems and Facilities 4,268,826 2,637,053 417,070 1,214,703 16 Resurfacing/Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 300,270 50,530 - 249,740 17 Sampson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 315,000 121,938 - 193,062 18 Sidewalk/Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways 476,585 141,541 - 335,044 19 Sixth Street East Improvement Roads, Bridges and Freeways 391,562 26,015 - 365,547 20 Sixth Street Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways 45,000 390 - 44,610 21 South Corona Master Planned Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 30,000 - - 30,000 22 Cost Allocation (Overhead) Operational Budget 29,995 29,995 ' - - Total ' By June 30, 2010 $11,760,305 $3,222,469 $1,811,758 $6,726,078 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010-11 to 2014-15 Agency: City of Corona Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: March 18, 2010 Fiscal Year 2010-11 Hem No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide GIS Master Plan Buildings, Facilities and Systems $6,114 $2,182 2 Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Installation/Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways $50,00o $50,000 3 Local Street Widening, Curb/Gutter Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways $100,000 $100,000 4 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways $1,700,000 $850,000 5 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways $50,000 $50,000 6 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways $3,087,950 $1,007,950 7 Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways $3oo,000 $3oo,000 8 Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Installation/Replacement Maintenance Roads, Bridges and Freeways $300,000 $300,000 9 Cost Allocation (Overhead) Operational Budget $29,785 $29,785 Total: Estimated Measure A Entitlements Disbursements: Prior Years Estimated Fund Balance: Oi Difference funded by prior available fund balance. $5,623,849 $2,689,917 $2,468,000 $221,917 Qi $2,689,917 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2010-11 to 2014-15 Agency: City of Corona Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: March 18, 2010 Fiscal Year 2011-12 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Arterial Widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways $200,000 $200,000 2 Citywide GIS Master Plan Buildings, Facilities and Systems $6,270 $2,237 3 Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Installation/Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways $300,000 $300,000 4 Local Street Widening, Curb/Gutter Improvements Roads Bridges and Freeways $150,000 $150,000 5 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways $200,000 $200,000 6 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways $50,000 $50,000 7 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways $1,595,084 $1,595,084 8 Cost Allocation (Overhead) Operational Budget $30,679 $30,679 Total: Estimated Measure A Entitlements Disbursements: $2,532,033 $2,528,000 $2,528,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2010-11 to 2014-15 Agency: City of Corona Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo Phone No.: (951) 2793537 Date: March 18, 2010 Fiscal Year 2012-13 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Arterial Widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways $200,000 $200,000 2 Citywide GIS Master Plan Buildings, Facilities and Systems $6,360 $2,269 3 Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Installation/Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways $300,000 $300,000 4 Local Street Widening, Curb/Gutter Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways $150,000 $150,000 5 Pavement Management Study Roads Bridges and Freeways $50,000 $50,000 6 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways $1,870,132 $1,870,132 7 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget $31,599 $31,599 Total: Estimated Measure A Entitlements Disbursements: $2,608,091 $2,604,000 $2,604,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2010-11 to2014-15 Agency: City of Corona Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: March 18, 2010 Fiscal Year 2013-14 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Arterial Widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways $200,000 $200,000 2 Citywide GIS Master Plan Buildings, Facilities and Systems $15,944 $5,689 3 Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Installation/Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways $300,000 $300,000 4 Local Street Widening, Curb/Gutter Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways $150,000 $150,000 5 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads, Bridges and Freeways $751,156 $751,156 6 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways $50,000 $50,000 7 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways $1,218,608 $1,218,608 8 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget $32,547 $32,547 Total: Estimated Measure A Entitlements Disbursements: $2,718,255 $2,708,000 $2,708,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010-11 to 2014-15 Agency: City of Corona Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Dana Romeo Phone No.: (951) 279-3537 Date: March 18, 2010 Fiscal Year 2014-15 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Arterial Widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways $200,000 $200,000 2 Citywide GIS Master Plan Buildings, Facilities and Systems $6,438 $2,297 3 Pavement Management Study Roads, Bridges and Freeways $50,000 $50,000 4 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget $33,523 $33,523 Total: Estimated Measure A Entitlements Disbursements: $289,961 $285,820 $2,843,000 CITY OF CORONA Street Related Admin, Maintenance & Capital Projects June 30, 2010 CALCULATION OF EXPENDITURE LEVEL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-2009 1. GENERAL AND DISCRETIONARY FUNDED STREET EXPENDITURES INCURRED : Actual Expenditures from July 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010 (See Attached***) Less: Transfers to the General Fund from Street Related Funds Estimated Expenditures from April 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010 $4,083,103 (575,365) 1,361,034 TOTAL GENERAL AND DISCRETIONARY EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR: $4,868,773 2. NON -DISCRETIONARY FUNDED STREET EXPENDITURES INCURRED : Actual Expenditures from July 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010 (See Attached**) Fund 227 - Measure A Fund 222 - Gas Tax Other Funds (including 44641430 - Street Lighting) 3,224,504 293,583 5,541,163 9,059,250 Actual Expenditures from July 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010 (See Attached**) $9,059,250 Fund 227 - Measure A Fund 222 - Gas Tax Other Funds (including 44641430 - Street Lighting) 1,074,835 97,861 1,847,054 3,019,750 Estimated Expenditures from April 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010 3,019,750 Total Annualized Non -Discretionary Expenditures: Fund 227 - Measure A Fund 222 - Gas Tax Other Funds (including 44641430 - Street Lighting) 4,299,339 391,444 7,388,218 12,079,000 TOTAL NON -DISCRETIONARY EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR: $12,079,000 3. LOCAL DISCRETIONARY FUND EXPENDITURES NECESSARY EACH YEAR TO MEET THE MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT REQUIREMENT FOR THE CITY OF CORONA IS $1,784,399 AS APPROVED BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ON JULY 8, 2009: Fiscal Year 2009/10 (BASE YEAR) General and Discretionary Fund Expenditures $1,784,399 CITY OF CORONA Street Related Admin & Maintenance June 30, 2010 Labor & Acct No. Description Overhead Contracts Cap Outlay Total Administration 11039110 Engineering Administration 206,271 206,271 11039220 Transportation/Env Planning 75,635 75,635 11039310 P.W. Capital Improvements 805,780 805,780 11039320 Public Works - Special Projects 65,439 65,439 11039430 Drainage Quality Engineering 65,593 65,593 11039510 Public Works Inspection-Misc 712,651 712,651 11048220 Urban Forestry 300,204 300,204 Total Administration Maintenance Gen. 110 2,231,573 0 0 2,231,573 2,231,573 11041110 Maintenance Administration 190,600 11041220 Concrete Maintenance 273,583 11041310 Street Maintenance 535,879 11041320 Drainage Maintenance 254,693 11041430 HOA/Street Lighting 74,623 11041440 Street Signs 140,832 11041520 Street Sweeping 252,918 11041530 Graffiti Removal 105,795 70800110 Major Pavement Rehab 10,081 24500000 Fund 245 - Drainage Quality Engineering 0 24539320 Special Projects 41,333 24539430 Drainage Quality Engineering 451,783 44600000 Fund 446 - Street Lighting 1,925 44639240 Signal Maintenance 501,423 44639320 Special Projects 128,025 44641430 Street Lighting 976,809 Total Maintenance 3,940,302 GRAND TOTAL 6,171,875 12,526 12,526 12,526 190,600 273,583 535,879 254,693 74,623 140,832 252,918 105,795 22,607 41,333 451,783 1,925 501,423 128,025 976,809 0 3,952,828 ** ** 1,851,530 Street Other Lighting 446 Funds 1,925 501,423 128,025 976,809 0 41,333 451,783 Grand Total 0 6,184,401 4,083,103 *** 1,608,182 493,116 6,184,401 Acct No. 62430222 62660222 63150222 69210222 69220222 69370222 70060222 70070222 70730222 70940222 72920222 80270222 Acct No. 61840227 62660222 62670227 62740227 69210227 69220227 69370227 70690227 70730227 70800227 70960227 71070227 71150227 80270227 Description Advanced Traffic Mgmt System Sixth St Pavement Pavement Rehab/Local Streets Pavement Rehab/Local Streets Resurfacing/Pavement McKinley/Santa Fe Fuller St Improvement Vicentia/Bollero Sidewalk/Curb/Gutter Install Miscellaneous Repair/Replacement Striping Rehabilitation In -pavement Crosswalk Lights Maint Description Circulation Element Update Sixth Street Pavement Sampson Ave Pavement Ontario / Magnolia Pavement Rehab / Local Streets Resurfacing & Pavement Maintenance McKinley/BNSF RR Pavement Management Study Sidewalk/Curb/Gutter Instal Major Pavement Rehab I-15/Magnolia Interchange Sixth Street East Improvement Auto Ctr/BSNF RR Curb, Gutter Sidewalk Replacement CITY OF CORONA Street Related Cap Expenditures June 30, 2010 Labor & Ovh Contracts Cap Outlay 4,478 70,961 O 7,259 40,969 27,256 1,612 18,776 3,223 O 4,975 O 4,450 0 9,743 14,668 27,619 19,933 4,389 924 31,148 O 1,200 Total Fund 222 75,439 75,439 7,259 7,259 68,225 68,225 20,388 20,388 3,223 3,223 4,975 4,975 4,450 4,450 9,743 9,743 42,287 42,287 24,322 24,322 32,072 32,072 1,200 1,200 CITY OF CORONA Street Related Cap Expenditures June 30, 2010 Labor & Ovh Contracts Cap Outlay O 6,305 390 1,914 120,025 11,278 2,230 23,715 2,613,338 23,102 30,452 O 300 O 5,680 21,101 144,111 6,473 12,009 O 33,041 1,901 24,114 3,174 10,077 32,950 96,824 Total 6,305 390 121,939 13,508 2,637,053 53,554 300 5,680 165,212 18,482 33,041 26,015 13,251 129,774 Measure A Fund 224 Fund 227 Measure A Fund 222 Fund 224 Fund 227 6,305 390 121,939 13,508 2,637,053 53,554 300 5,680 165,212 18,482 33,041 26,015 13,251 129,774 Other Funds Other Funds Fund # 222 Fund # Totals 293,583 Totals 227 3,224,504 Measure A Other Acct No. Description Labor & Ovh Contracts Cap Outlay Total Fund 222 Fund 224 Fund 227 Funds Fund # Totals 65480211 2008/09 SR2S Project 1,122 4,603 5,725 5,725 211 69270211 E1 Cerrito / I-15 0 1,471 1,471 1,471 211 69500211 I-15/Cajalco Improvement 0 8,802 8,802 8,802 211 70630211 Traffic Signal Construction 0 13,190 13,190 13,190 211 71070211 Sixth Street East Improvements 0 53,912 53,912 53,912 211 83,100 86050212 Chase Street Improvement 0 750 750 750 212 750 62430242 Advanced Traffic 16,603 695,864 712,467 712,467 242 712,467 62430243 Advanced Traffic 0 986,713 986,713 986,713 243 62660243 Sixth Street Pavement Rehab 29,963 864,469 894,432 894,432 243 62670243 Sampson Ave Pavement Rehab 11,835 751,606 763,441 763,441 243 65480243 2008/09 SR2S Project 1,684 34,490 36,174 36,174 243 71070243 Sixth Street East Improvements 1,600 134,216 135,816 135,816 243 71150243 Auto Center DR / BNSF 0 229,785 229,785 229,785 243 3,046,361 62740261 Ontario / Magnolia / Main 0 353,864 353,864 353,864 261 80020261 SC Mstr plan street part 860 14,996 15,856 15,856 261 86040261 Foothill Parkway West 310 142,461 142,771 142,771 261 512,491 Measure A Other Acct No. Description Labor & Ovh Contracts Cap Outlay Total Fund 222 Fund 224 Fund 227 Funds Fund # Totals 70630446 Traffic Signal 883 883 883 446 883 61970478 Green River Road Improvements 1,458 12,487 13,945 13,945 478 86040478 Foothill Parkway Westerly Extn 36,522 81,540 118,062 118,062 478 132,007 69370479 McKinley/BSNF RR 836 8,580 9,416 9,416 479 70960479 Magnolia/ I-15 2,726 256 2,982 2,982 479 71150479 Auto Center/BSNF RR Grade Sep 377 63,520 63,897 63,897 479 76,295 Totals 318,584 7,685,637 0 8,082,441 293,583 0 3,224,504 4,564,354 8,082,441 Prepared by Theresa Dailey, Finance Department April, May & June's Est Exp 2,694,147 97,861 1,074,835 1,521,451 10,//6,588 391,444 44641430 Street Lighting annualized 4,299,339 6,085,806 1. _3 0 2 ,.412 7,388,218 89265 SM, AZ, GA City of Desert Hot Springs 65-950 Pierson Blvd. • Desert Hot Springs • CA • 92240 (760) 329-6411 www.cityofdhs.org Department of Public Works May 28, 2010 Ms. Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 4080 Lemon Street, 3'" floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attention: Ms. Andrea Zureick, Senior Staff Analyst -Programming RE: FY 2011-2015 MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS Dear Ms. Shirley Medina: Enclosed please find a copy of the City of Desert Hot Springs Five Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan along with the City of Desert Hot Springs Measure "A" status report for submittal to the Riverside County Transportation Commission for review and approval. If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 329-6411extension 218. Sincerey? Amir H. Modarressi, P.E. Interim City Engineer cc: Rudy Acosta, Assistant City Manager / Redevelopment Director Jason Simpson, Assistant City Manager / Administrative Director encl.: rn R.. JUN. 07 ")�1 �I <, _� RlvERsICE couN . TRANsPoRTA IoN comm r,N X.29.23 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011-2015 Agency: CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: AMIR MODARRESSI Phone # (760)329-6411, Ext. 218 Date: May 25, 2010 Item Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure "A" No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Acoma Ave, Buena Vista Ave, Cahuilla Ave Desert View Ave Estrlla Ave, Flora Ave (from Wcst Dr. to Cactus Dr.) Western Avenue and Scenic Drive Road Improvements Palm Drive traffic signal improvements (from Camino Campanero to Pierson Blvd. Street improvements for Ramona Dr Cactus Dr El Cajon dr. La Mesa Dr; Calliente Dr. (from Hacienda Ave to Two Bunch Patens Tr) And Hacienda Ave & Ironwood Dr (from Palm Dr to Ramona Dr) City-wide tratiic and speed studies Sarita Dr.,Susan Dr.Mark Dr. Nathum DR Luis Dr. Verbena Dr. (from Two Bunch Palms To Ironwood Dr.) Final design, Construction engineering and Construction Preliminary engineering, final design Construction engineering and Construction Preliminary engineering, final design Construction engineering and Construction Preliminary engineering, final design Construction engineering and Construction Traffic Engineering Study Preliminary engineering, final design Construction engineering and Construction ($1,000's) $ 2,400 $ 391 $ 658 $2,200 $ 75 $ 900 funds ($1,000's) $ 650 $ 41 $ 200 $ 414 $ 75 $ 350 GRAND TOTAL $ 6,624 $1,730 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010-2011 Agency: CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: AMIR MODARRESSI Phone # (760)329-6411, Ext. 218 Date: May 25, 2010 Item Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure "A" No. ($1,000's) funds ($1,000's) l Acoma Ave, Buena Vista Ave, Cahuilla Ave Final design, Construction engineering and $ 1800 $ 350 Desert View Ave Estrlla Ave, Flora Ave Construction (from West Dr. to Cactus Dr.) 2 Western Avenue and Scenic Drive Road Preliminary engineering, final design $ 250 $ 21 Improvements Construction engineering and Construction 3 Palm Drive traffic signal improvements Preliminary engineering, final design $ 390 $ 100 (from Camino Campanero to Pierson Blvd. Construction engineering and Construction 5 City-wide traffic and speed studies Traffic Engineering Study $ 75 $ 75 GRAND TOTAL $2,515 $ 546 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011-2012 Agency: CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: AMIR MODARRESSI Phone # (760)329-6411, Ext. 218 Date: May 25, 2010 Item Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure "A" No. ($1,000's) funds ($1,000's) 1 Acoma Ave, Buena Vista Ave, Cahuilla Ave Final design, Construction engineering and $ 400 $ 176 Desert View Ave Estrlla Ave, Flora Ave Construction (from West Dr. to Cactus Dr.) 2 Western Avenue and Scenic Drive Road Preliminary engineering, final design $ 141 $ 20 Improvements Construction engineering and Construction 3 Palm Drive traffic signal improvements Preliminary engineering, final design $ 268 $ 100 (from Camino Campanero to Pierson Blvd. Construction engineering and Construction GRAND TOTAL $ 809 $ 296 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE `°A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012-2013 Agency: CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: AMIR MODARRESSI Phone # (760)329-6411, Ext. 218 Date: May 25, 2010 Item Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure "A" No. ($1,000's) funds ($1,000's) 1 Acoma Ave, Buena Vista Ave, Cahuilla Ave Final design, Construction engineering and $ 200 $ 124 Desert View Ave Estrlla Ave, Flora Ave Construction (from West Dr. to Cactus Dr.) 4 Street improvements for Ramona Dr Cactus Dr. Preliminary engineering, final design $1,500 $ 181 El Cajon dr. La Mesa Dr; Calliente Dr. Construction engineering and Construction (from Hacienda Ave to Two Bunch Palms Tr) And Hacienda Ave & Ironwood Dr (from Palm Dr to Ramona Dr) GRAND TOTAL $1,700 $ 305 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013-2014 Agency: CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: AMIR MODARRESSI Phone # (760)329-6411, Ext. 218 Date: May 25, 2010 Item Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure "A" No. ($1,000's) funds ($1,000's) 4 Street improvements for Ramona Dr Cactus Dn Preliminary engineering, final design $ 350 $ 100 El Cajon dr. La Mesa Dr; Calliente Dr. Construction engineering and Construction (from Hacienda Ave to Two Bunch Palms Tr) And Hacienda Ave & Ironwood Dr (from Palm Dr to Ramona Dr) 6 Sarita Dr.,Susan Dr.Mark Dr. Nathum DR Preliminary engineering, final design $ 450 $ 150 Luis Dr. Verbena Dr. (from Two Bunch Palms Construction engineering and Construction To Ironwood Dr.) GRAND TOTAL $ 800 $ 250 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014-2015 Agency: CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: AMIR MODARRESSI Phone # (760)329-6411, Ext. 218 Date: May 25, 2010 Item Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure "A" No. ($1,000's) hands ($1,000's) 4 Street improvements for Ramona Dr Cactus Dn Preliminary engineering, final design $ 350 $ 133 El Cajon dr. La Mesa Dr; Calliente Dr. Construction engineering and Construction (from Hacienda Ave to Two Bunch Palms Tr) And Hacienda Ave & Ironwood Dr (from Palm Dr to Ramona Dr) 6 Sarita Dr.,Susan Dr.Mark Dr. Nathum DR Preliminary engineering, final design $ 450 $ 200 Luis Dr. Verbena Dr. (from Two Bunch Palms Construction engineering and Construction To Ironwood Dr.) GRAND TOTAL $ 800 $ 333 CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS CAPITAL PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 28, 2010 By: Amir Modarressi SLURRY SEAL CONSTRUCTION ON VARIOUS CITY STREETS, PROJECT - There are streets through -out the City that are programmed to receive slurry seal as part of the City Pavement Management System. The construction of street slurry covered more than three million square feet of streets through- out the City. The construction was completed without any cost overrun. ESSENTIAL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II- This project is for Street improvements in an area defined by the streets between West Dr and Palm Dr from Pierson Blvd to Hacienda Ave. The rehabilitation work will include pulverizing the existing AC paving, construction of curbs, gutters, cross gutters, driveway approaches, and sidewalks. The staff has secured the Caftans approval of the project and will send out for construction bidding as early as May 2009. WESTERN AVENUE/SCENIC DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS- This project is for street improvement to Westem Avenue (Pierson Blvd. to 600' north of Scenic Drive) and also Scenic Drive (from 200' west of Westem Avenue to 600' east of Westem Avenue). The engineering design work is 90% complete. Preliminary Environmental Study is being reviewed by Caltrans Local Assistance. The request for Authorization will be submitted to Caftans as soon as Caftans approves the Preliminary Environmental Study. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for City of Desert Hot Springs, (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission CMeasure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: Mav 25, 2010 Rick D iels, City Manager ATTEST: I Soriano, Deputy City Clerk City of Desert Hot Springs Measure A Transportation Fund Notes to Financial Statements Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fee Program As required under Measure A, Measure A monies cannot be allocated to individual cities in the Coachella Valley unless they participate in the Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program, which is necessary for the implementation of the planned Regional Arterial System. The City collected TUMF fees totaling approximately $93,725 in 2008, which were remitted to the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). Maintenance of Effort In accordance with the laws and regulations of Measure A, the City is required to maintain its continuous commitment of local discretionary expenditures for streets and roads. The base year calculation of local discretionary expenditures (Base Year) represents the average amount of streets and road expenditures incurred for 2005 through 2008. During 2008, the City's local discretionary expenditures for streets and roads, as calculated below, indicates the City is in conformance with this requirement. The City has a total cumulative excess of local discretionary expenditures of $129,725 on June 30, 2008. 2008 Current Year local discretionary expenditures $229,628 Less: Base Year $(124,036) Excess of current year expenditures under Base Year $105,592 Excess local expenditures at the bepjnning of the year $ 24,133 Excess local expenditures at the end of the year $129,725 Item No.Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 07/08 Measure A Allocation Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 2,305,000 08/09 Measure A Allocation Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,565,000 08/09 Small Rehab Projects Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 300,000 09/10 Measure A Allocation Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,047,000 Total Measure A Funds to be carried forward in 2010-2011 5,217,000 2010-2011 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,022,000 TOTALS 0 1,022,000 PRIOR YEAR MEASURE A FUNDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 Agency: City of Hemet Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Mike Gow Phone #: (951) 765-3870 Date: May 25, 2010 Item No.Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,047,000 1,047,000 TOTALS 1,047,000 1,047,000 Phone #: (951) 765-3870 Date: May 25, 2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2012 Agency: City of Hemet Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Mike Gow Item No.Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,078,000 1,078,000 TOTALS 1,078,000 1,078,000 Phone #: (951) 765-3870 Date: May 25, 2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012 - 2013 Agency: City of Hemet Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Mike Gow Item No.Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,122,000 1,122,000 TOTALS 1,122,000 1,122,000 Prepared by: Mike Gow Phone #: (951) 765-3870 Date: May 25, 2010 MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 Agency: City of Hemet Page 4 of 5 Item No.Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance & Improvements 1,178,000 1,178,000 TOTALS 1,178,000 1,178,000 Prepared by: Mike Gow Phone #: (951) 765-3870 Date: May 25, 2010 MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Agency: City of Hemet Page 5 of 5 MEASURE ‘A’ LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY Ending JUNE 30, 2010 Agency: City of Hemet Date: May 25, 2010 ; 2006/2007 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Project #5500) Progress to Date Project completed TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE $7,200.000 Completion Date May 11, 2010 ; 2007/08 Street Rehabilitation (Project #6503) Progress to Date Funds to be used for 2010-2011 Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project, which is currently in design. TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE $ 2,305,000 Completion Date To be determined ; 2008/09 Street Rehabilitation (Project #6504) Progress to Date Funds to be used for 2010-2011 Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project, which is currently in design. TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE $ 1,565,000 Completion Date To be determined ; 2008/09 Small Rehab/Paving Projects (Project #6505) Progress to Date Funds to be used for 2010-2011 Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project, which is currently in design. TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE $ 300,000 Completion Date To be determined ; 2009/10 Annual Pavement Rehab Project (Project #6506) Progress to Date Funds to be used for 2010-2011 Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project, which is currently in design. TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE $ 1,047,000 Completion Date To be determined MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for 14E:- Ce of- k/i ,7 (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: 201 Cd/ CITY MANAGER ATTES : SET -LAY r114/1-MG� City of Hemet 2010 Measure A MOE - Base Year (FY 08/09) Account Description 120-9900-9950 Discretionary spending from Street Report General Fund Op Trans to 221/Grading Import Fee on Large 81,369 100.00% $ 81,369 dirt hauling trucks FY 08/09 Amount Percent Base Year Net Amt 227-9900-9950 Op Trans to 221/Traffic signal maint & energy 30,000 100.00% $ 30,000 LLMD 254-4400 Street Sweeping 349,940 100.00% $ 349,940 Sewer 254-9900-9950 Op Trans to 221/maintain road shoulders & other 309,996 50.00% $ 154,998 Sewer drainage areas that impact storm drains & NPDES sys-work done by street crews funded by yard depts Equipment Replacement - Streets dept allocation 684-4550 Equipment Maintenance - Streets dept allocation 686-4100 PW Engineering 168,705 100.00% $ 168,705 100.00% $ (1) 653,055 50.00% $ 326,528 227/228 Various Lighting & Landscape Districts 72,066 100.00% $ 72,066 Total $ 1,183,605 I:ICOMMONTNCEISPREADS1MOE12010 Measure A MOE, 6/14/2010, 5:58 PM INDIAN WELLS CALI FORNIA February 23, 2010 Riverside County Transportation Commission Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Officer 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 88741 SM/AZ/GA -biy_E©11]WIE l MAR 02 2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Re: Measure "A": Local Streets and Roads five-year Capital Improvement Plan and Status Update Dear Ms. Medina: Attached is the City of Indian Wells Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2010/11-2014/15. Following is the status of the City project listed on the FY 2009-10 five-year plan: Project Status Cost Measure "A" ($000's) ($000's) Citywide Traffic Services Ongoing $631 $163 Sincerely, Paul Goble, P.E., T.E. Public Works Director c: Kevin McCarthy, Finance Director 44-950 Eldorado Drive -- Indian Wells, California 92210-7497 -- V (760) 346-2459 F (760) 346-0407 www.IndianWells com X.29.09 Agency: Page: Prepared by: Phone/E-mail: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010-2011 The City of Indian Wells 1 of 1 Paul Goble, P.E., T.E., Public Works Director (760) 776-0237 pgoble(@indianwells.com February 23, 2010 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) $167 1 Citywide Traffic Services Mowing, Tree trimming, and watering within right of way. Replace top soil, shrubs, trees, irrigation facilities, etc. $630/year TOTAL $630 $167 Agency: Page: Prepared by: Phone/E-mail: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011-2012 The City of Indian Wells 1of1 Paul Goble, P.E., T.E., Public Works Director (760) 776-0237 pgoble©indianwells.com February 23, 2010 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) 1 Citywide Traffic Services Mowing, Tree trimming, and watering within right of way. Replace top soil, shrubs, trees, irrigation facilities, etc. $630/year $175 TOTAL $630 $175 Agency: Page: Prepared by: Phone/E-mail: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012-2013 The City of Indian Wells 1of1 Paul Goble, P.E., T.E., Public Works Director (760) 776-0237 pgoble@indianwells.com February 23, 2010 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) $181 1 Citywide Traffic Services Mowing, Tree trimming, and watering within right of way. Replace top soil, shrubs, trees, irrigation facilities, etc. $630/year TOTAL $630 $181 Agency: Page: Prepared by: Phone/E-mail: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013-2014 The City of Indian Wells 1 of 1 Paul Goble, P.E., T.E., Public Works Director (760) 776-0237 pgoble@indianwells.com February 23, 2010 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) 1 Citywide Traffic Services Mowing, Tree trimming, and watering within right of way. Replace top soil, shrubs, trees, irrigation facilities, etc. $630/year $188 TOTAL $630 $188 Agency: Page: Prepared by: Phone/E-mail: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014-2015 The City of Indian Wells 1 of 1 Paul Goble, P.E., T.E., Public Works Director (760) 776-0237 pgobleC�indianwells.com February 23, 2010 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) 1 Citywide Traffic Services Mowing, Tree trimming, and watering within right of way. Replace top soil, shrubs, trees, irrigation facilities, etc. $630/year $197 TOTAL $630 $197 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for City of Indian Wells that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: February 24, 2010 Finance Direct ,.ATTEST: Public Wor s Director June 2010 City of Indian Wells July -June 2010 Feb-09 Estimate Actual 12months � � pit °r^,�. ,aF.FI� I "J 204 209 215-218 250 337 General Fund 81-01 PW Admit' 5110-5260 sal/benefit 322,700 484,050 484,050 83-01 Maint 5640 materials (actual + emcum) 29,811 44,717 44,717 Traffic Safety 101-83-02 7,083 10,625 10,625 202-83-02 54,981 82,472 82,472 Capital Improve. 93.99 FAMD Rehabilitation Project 139,273 139,273 93.70 Pavement Overlay 0 0 93.12-14 Hwy 111 Imerovements 843,021 843,021 93.97 Fred Waring Widenin% 0 0 Gas Tax All Gas Tax Funds 29,581 44,372 44,372 Landscape/Lighting xxx.84.xx.xxxxx All LLMD's 942,645 942,645 204.84.xx.xxxxx Mem A 205,000 205,000 . 101.84.20.xxxxx Cgwude 478,531 478,531 ` _TOTAL 3,274,704 1,017,922 82,472 . 0 205,000 139,273 44,372 942,645 843,021 D DISCRETIONARY 1,100,394 B BASE M.O.E. 55,962 E EXCESS __ULU& , !CITY OF INDIAN WELLS SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR ENDINjG JUNE 30, 2009 F F Maintenance of Effort, discretionary spending, Current Year 1,100 394 Excess Current Year $ $1,044,432 2/25/2010 12:35 PM kevinlmoelMeasA-MOE 89093 TT, SM CITY OF INDIO 100 CIVIC CENTER MALL • INDIO, CA 92201 760.391.4000 • FAX 760.391.4008 • WWW.INDIO.ORG May 5, 2010 Ms. Shirley Medina Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 FECLAVE IA MAY 06 MO RIVERSIDE COUNTY 'TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Subject: Five Year Measure A Capital Improvement Plan (FY 2011-2015) Dear Ms. Medina: Enclosed is the City of Indio's submittal of the Five Year Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2011-2015 to the Riverside County Transportation Commission for review and approval. The City's Maintenance of Effort certification is also enclosed, as well as a status report for projects utilizing Measure A funds in Fiscal Year 2009-2010. If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 541-4251. Sincerely, Adrienne E. Dunfee, P.E. Principal Civil Engineer cc: Jim L. Smith. P.E., Director of Public Works Grant Eklund, P.E., City Engineer Brian Kinder, Accountant X.29.10 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2011-2015 Agency: City of Indio Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Adrienne Dunfee, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: (760) 541-4251 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Miles Avenue Bridge and Widening of Miles Construction, Repayment $ 870 $ 820 Avenue and Clinton Street 2. Madison Street from Indio Boulevard to Final Design, ROW $ 573 $ 140 Avenue 50 3. Interchange Reconstruction Projects Preliminary Engineering, Final $ 6,507 $ 862 Design, Environmental, Construction 4. Bridge Repairs and Safety Enhancements Final Design, Construction $ 645 $ 645 5. Monroe Street / Doctor Carreon Boulevard Construction $ 234 $ 140 Sidewalk Improvements 6. Measure A Advance Repayment $ 3,365 $ 3,365 GRAND TOTAL $ 12,194 $ 5,972 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2010-2011 Agency: City of Indio Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Adrienne Dunfee, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: (760) 541-4251 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Miles Avenue Bridge and Widening of Miles Construction $ 70 $ 20 Avenue and Clinton Street 2. Madison Street from Indio Boulevard to Final Design, ROW $ 573 $ 140 Avenue 50 3. Interchange Reconstruction Projects Preliminary Engineering, Environmental $ 1,030 $ 75 4. Bridge Repairs and Safety Enhancements Design $ 50 $ 50 5. Monroe Street / Doctor Carreon Boulevard Construction $ 234 $ 140 Sidewalk Improvements 6. Measure A Advance Repayment $ 673 $ 673 GRAND TOTAL $ 2,630 $ 1,098 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2011-2012 Agency: City of Indio Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Adrienne Dunfee, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: (760) 541-4251 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Miles Avenue Bridge and Widening of Miles $ 200 $ 200 Avenue and Clinton Street Repayment 2. Bridge Repairs and Safety Enhancements Construction $ 280 $ 280 3. Measure A Advance Repayment $ 673 $ 673 GRAND TOTAL $ 1,153 $ 1,153 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Indio Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Adrienne Dunfee, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: (760) 541-4251 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Miles Avenue Bridge and Widening of Miles $ 200 $ 200 Avenue and Clinton Street Repayment 2. Bridge Repairs and Safety Enhancements Construction $ 315 $ 315 3. Measure A Advance Repayment $ 673 $ 673 GRAND TOTAL $ 1,188 $ 1,188 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Indio Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Adrienne Dunfee, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: (760) 541-4251 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Miles Avenue Bridge and Widening of Miles $ 200 $ 200 Avenue and Clinton Street Repayment 2. Interchange Reconstruction Projects Construction $ 2,808 $ 363 3. Measure A Advance Repayment $ 673 $ 673 GRAND TOTAL $ 3,681 , $ 1,236 Riverside County Transportation Commission Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2014-2015 Agency: City of Indio Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Adrienne Dunfee, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Phone #: (760)541-4251 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Miles Avenue Bridge and Widening of Miles $ 200 $ 200 Avenue and Clinton Street Repayment 2. Interchange Reconstruction Projects Construction $ 2,669 $ 424 3. Measure A Advance Repayment $ 673 $ 673 GRAND TOTAL $ 3,542 $1,297 CITY OF INDIO MEASURE "A" PROJECT STATUS REPORT MAY 2010 Avenue 42 Widening from Clinton Street to Golf Center Parkway Project Description: ♦ This is for widening of Avenue 42 to 6 lanes between Clinton Street and Jackson Street, and to 4 lanes between Jackson Street and Golf Center Parkway. Project Status: ♦ Construction of the segment between Spectrum Street and Golf Center Parkway was completed in 2008. ♦ Construction work on the widening of the southern portion of the roadway between Monroe Street and Spectrum Street and was completed in November 2009. Monroe Street between Interstate 10 and Avenue 42 was also widening from 2 to 6 lanes as part of this project. ♦ Design of the widening of the segment between Clinton Street and Monroe Street and the northern portion of the roadway between Monroe Street and Spectrum Street has been completed. Construction of these improvements is pending the acquisition of right-of-way and availability of funding. Golf Center Parkway Rehab — UPRR to Indio Springs Parkway Project Description: ♦ This project includes rehabilitation of the pavement on Golf Center Parkway between Indio Springs Parkway and the Union Pacific Railroad. A traffic signal is also being installed at the intersection of Golf Center Parkway and Avenue 45. Project Status: ♦ Construction is underway and is scheduled to be complete in July 2010. Madison Street from Indio Boulevard to Avenue 50 Project Description: ♦ This project includes the widening of existing segments to conformance with General Plan width, and the construction of missing segments to create a continuous roadway between Indio Boulevard and Avenue 50. Project Status: ♦ Pavement rehabilitation was completed on the segment between Miles Avenue and Highway 111 in January 2010. ♦_ Design continues on the missing segment between Fred Waring Drive and Miles Avenue. This segment includes construction of a bridge over the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel. CITY OF INDIO MEASURE "A" PROJECT STATUS REPORT MAY 2010 Interchanue Reconstruction Projects Project Description: ♦ This is for planning and environmental studies at four Interstate 10 interchanges in the City of Indio. Project Status: ♦ Revisions to the project description for the Jefferson Street interchange will require recirculation of the Environmental Document for public comment. Updates to the technical studies are being performed at this time. It is anticipated that the Environmental Document will be released for public comment in Spring 2011. ♦ Project Study Reports are underway at the Monroe Street, Jackson Street, and Golf Center Parkway interchanges. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for City of Indio (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: May 18, 2010 Tara A.:ms, Interim Cit. anager ATTEST: CITY OF INDIO MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FYE 6/30/10 FUND DEPT ACCOUNT/DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES 101 4160/4161 ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION 466,209.00 101 4270 TRAFFIC CONTROLS/SIGNALS 402,458.00 101 4310 STREET LIGHTING 147,000.00 101 4341 STREET MAINTENANCE 947,099.00 101 4346 STREET CLEANING 602,826.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES -UNAUDITED ESTIMATED 2,565,592.00 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FOR YEAR ENDING 6/30/10 2,565,592.00 APPROVED BY: SAN MAHONEY AN d')//r SERVICES DIRECTOR SU A CITY OF A LAU• LSINOU :` DREAM EXTREME 89094 TT, SM CO(�MI D' Mry;201 May 6, 2010 TRANSPORTATION COMRIVERSIDE MISSION Ms. Shirley Medina, Program Manager Westem Riverside Council of Governments Riverside County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3679 Subject: Maintenance of Effort Measure A Five -Year CIP Dear Ms. Medina, Enclosed for your review is the City of Lake Elsinore's 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program Five -Year plan and Maintenance of Effort Certification. If you have any questions, please contact me at 951-674-3124 Ext. 244. Sincerely, X—d7.14—� Ken Seumalo Director of Public Works City Engineer 951.674.3124 130 S MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92.530 WWW LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG X.29.11 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for rkg cwt. of [.AKG gcsc atec(the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be .used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: /114-1" , age z '/o ITY MANAGER ATTEST: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Ken Seumalo Phone #: 951-674-3124 Fact. 244 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. 2011 Annual curb, gutter, sidewalk repair program Maintenance $130,000 $130,000 2. 2011 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance $130,000 $130,000 3. 2011 Pavement Maintenance $282,000 $282,000 Management Program 4. 2011 Roadway Drainage Construction $100,000 $100,000 Projects 5. 2011 Street Slope Repair Maintenance $75,000 $75,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Ken Seumalo Phone #: 951-674-3124 Ext. 244 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name ! Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. 2012 Annual curb, gutter, sidewalk repair program Maintenance $130,000 $130,000 2. 2012 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance $130,000 $130,000 3. 2012 Pavement Maintenance $374,000 $374,000 Management Program 4. 2021 Roadway Drainage Construction $100,000 $100,000 Projects RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: Page, of 5 Prepared by: Ken Seumalo Phone #: 951-674-3124 Ext. 244 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. 2013 Annual curb, gutter, sidewalk repair program Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 2. 2013 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 3. 2013 Pavement Maintenance $456,000 $456,000 Management Program 4. 2013 Roadway Drainage Construction $100,000 $100,000 Projects RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Ken Seumalo Phone #: 951-674-3124 Ext. 244 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name ! Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. 2014 Annual curb, gutter, sidewalk repair program Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 2. 2014 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 3. 2014 Pavement Maintenance $487,000 $487,000 Management Program 4. 2014 Roadway Drainage Construction $100,000 $100,000 Projects RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Ken Seumalo Phone #: 951-674-3124 Ext. 244 Date: May 5, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. 2015 Annual curb, gutter, sidewalk repair program Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 2. 2015 Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 3. 2015 Pavement Maintenance $526,000 $526,000 Management Program 4. 2015 Roadway Drainage Construction $100,000 $100,000 Projects 89198 AZ, SM, GA RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Menifee Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public Works Phone #: 951-672-6777 Date: May 24, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2009-2010 Carryover Street Improvements Street Maintenance Street Improvements Street Maintenance Street Maintenance $200,000 $300,000 $120,000 $400,000 $500,000 $960,000 $746,000 $200,000 $300,000 $120,000 $400,000 $500,000 2010-2011 1 2 3 4 5 Newport Rd Haun Rd South Median Modification Bradley Rd Newport Rd to Potomac Rd AC Overlay Newport Rd Antelope Rd North Median Modification Encanto Rd Shadel Rd to Ethanac Rd AC Overlay Residential Slurry Program TOTALS $1,520,000 $1,520,000 X.29.26 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Menifee Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public Works Phone #: 951-672-6777 Date: May 24, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2010-2011 Carryover $186,000 2011-2012 $764,000 1 Slurry Seal Program Street Maintenance $400,000 $400,000 2 Garbani Rd, Bradley Rd at Craig Ave to Kurt St Street Improvments $300,000 $300,000 3 Residential Overlays Street Maintenance $500,000 $151,000 4 Residential Slurry Seal Program Street Maintenance $500,000 $99,000 TOTALS $1,700,000 $950,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Menifee Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public Works Phone #: 951-672-6777 Date: May 24, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2012-2013 Street Improvments Street Maintenance Street Maintenance Street Maintenance $1,500,000 $400,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $787,000 $787,000 $0 $0 $0 1 2 3 4 Newport Rd Widening, Antelope Rd to Menifee Rd Residential Slurry Seal Program Residential Overlays Murrieta Rd Newport Rd to Cherry Hills Blvd Overlay TOTALS $3,900,000 $787,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Menifee Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public Works Phone #: 951-672-6777 Date: May 24, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2013-2014 $818,000 1 Residential Overlays Street Maintenance $500,000 $318,000 2 Residential Slurry Seal Program Street Maintenance $500,000 $500,000 3 Newport Rd Haun Rd to Murrieta Rd Overlay Street Maintenance $2,000,000 $0 TOTALS $3,000,000 $818,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Menifee Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public Works Phone #: 951-672-6777 Date: May 24, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2014-2015 $859,000 1 Residential Overlays Street Maintenance $500,000 $359,000 2 Residential Slurry Seal Program Street Maintenance $500,000 $500,000 3 Holland Rd Realignment Street Improvements $5,000,000 $0 TOTALS $6,000,000 $859,000 89091 TT, SM TEL: 951.413.3130 FAX: 951.413.3170 www.MOVAL.ORG May 4, 2010 MORENO VALLEY WHERE DREAMS SOAR 14177 FREDERICK SI REEF P. O. Box 88005 MORENO VALLEY. CA 92552-080.5 BlEiCE ME-) MAY 06 2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Ms. Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92502 Subject: Fiscal Year 2011-2015 Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan and Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement Dear Ms. Trevino: The City of Moreno Valley is pleased to submit its Fiscal Year (FY) 2011-2015 Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The City Council reviewed and approved the Five -Year Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads CIP and Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement on April 27, 2010. For questions regarding the Measure "A" CIP please contact Linda Wilson, Senior Management Analyst, at (951) 413-3132 or by email at lindawi@moval.org. Sincerely, Linda Wilson Senior Management Analyst Enclosures: Measure "A" Local Funds Program FY 2009/2010 Approved Budget (Attachment "A") Measure "A" Local Funds Program FY 2011 - 2015 (Attachment `B") MOE Certification Statement (Attachment "C") MOE Projection for FY 2009/2010 (Attachment "D") c: File Prem Kumar, Deputy Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X.29.12 .V. 1N3WHOb'lld RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2009 / 2010 APPROVED BUDGET Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 1 of 2 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone No: 951-413-3132 Date: May 7, 2010 Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Item No. Business Unit ProjectName/Limits Project Type Status Total Cost 1,000s Measure A Funding 1 54150 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget Provide functions for transportation projects and services: annual update of 5-Year CIP, revisions to Standard Plans, annual update to DBE specifications, development of DBE AADPL, preparation of grant applications, quarterly utility coordination, MSHCP reporting, and project engineering and right of way services for unfunded new projects. 436 438 2 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead Estimated amount of overhead costs to be distributed to Measure A projects based on projected revenue of $2,279,000. 182 182 3 56330 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Program Rehabilitation On -going annual program. 3,706 ' 77 4 56339 Pavement Rehab -Operations & Maintenance (PROM) Program Rehabilitation Rehabilitation projects under $30.000 each completed by City maintenance staff . 765 765 5 65320 Bicycle Lane Bicycle Lane Local match funding for BTA grant awards to stripe Class II bike lanes to conned discontinuous segments of the Aqueduct Bike Trail. 127 Z - 6 66625 SR-60 Eastbound Ramps/Redlands Bvld. Traffic Signal Freeway Ramp & Traffic Signal Project completed February 2010. 1,269 1,269 7 66626 Graham St./Bay Ave. Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Project completed November 2008. Carryover funds were for a one- year warrant period. 11 11 8 66627 1 Perris Blvd SB Lane to SR-60 WB On -Ramp Street Improvements Complete design. 46 46 9 66628 Cottonwood Ave./Pattilynn Dr. School Crossing Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Project completed. 226 226 10 66629 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Upgrades Sidewalk Improvements On -going program for design and construction of ADA compliant curb ramps. 200 200 11 66722 Reche Vista Dr. Realignment/Perris Blvd./Heacock St. to NCL Street Improvements Continue design. 3,913 3 1,279 12 66727 Alessandro Blvd. Raised Median at Gaye St. to Perris Blvd. Median Project deferred. Retum funds to Fund Balance. 147 147 13 66728 Cottonwood Ave. at Oliver St Striping/Channelization/Rd Safety Street Improvements Project completed July 2009. 25 25 14 66729 Heacock Street South Extension Street Improvements Alignment and traffic study. 35 35 15 66825 Heacock St. Bridge/PVSD Lateral "A" Bridge Complete design. 258 ` 30 16 66827 Moreno Beach/Rte 60 Right Turn Lane Improvements Street Improvements Project on hold. Return funds to Fund Balance. 89 89 17 66828 Roadside Safety Improvements/Elder Ave. W/o Nason St. Street Improvements Project completed July 2009. 48 48 18 66829 Nason St./Riverside Co. Regional Medical Center TS Traffic Signal Traffic signal design. 35 35 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2009 / 2010 APPROVED BUDGET Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 2 of 2 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Phone No: 951-413-3132 Date: May 7, 2010 19 66927 Redlands Blvd./SR-60 WB Ramp Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Complete design. 46 46 20 67123 Indian St./Cactus Ave. Intersection Imprv. and Storm Drain Street & Strom Drain Improvements Completed January 2009. Project closeout January 2010. 31 31 21 67128 Sunnymead Blvd./Frederick St. to Perris Blvd. Street Improvements Median construction October 2009 to May 2010. 6,106 5 - 22 67425 Heacock St./Gentian-Poppystone & Frederick-Sunnymead Street Improvements Project completed. Project closeout June 2010. 146 146 23 67428 Pigeon Pass Rd. Widening/Climbing Rose Dr. to NCL Street Improvements Project completed. 1,165 ° 23 24 67524 Aqueduct Bikeway Improvement/Indian St. to Fay Ave. Bicycle Trail Project completed October 2009. 713 713 25 82824 Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Hump Program) Speed Hump On -going annual program for design and construction of speed humps. 190 190 26 82828 Indian St./Alessandro Blvd Sidewalk Improvements Sidewalk Improvements Construction May 2010 to July 2010. 215 7 21 27 84830 Pavement Rehabilitation Program (fonnerly Slurry Seal Program) Resurface On -going annual program. 292 292 28 85020 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation On -going annual program. 153 153 29 85523 Street Improvement Program (SIP) Street Improvements On -going annual program. 307 307 30 89720 SR-60/Nason St. Interchange IC Impry EB/WB Ramps Design, utility relocation, right of way and construction. Estimated construction start date is June 2010. 13,705 ° 6,089 31 New A Dracaea Ave. Sidewalk/Morrison St. to Mascot Ln. Sidewalk Improvements Complete design. Y54 9 44 FY 200912010 Total 34,841 12,955 " Includes FY 08/09 carryover funds. Traffic Congestion Relief (Prop 42) - $1,468,274; Proposition 1 B - $2,160,978 3 FY 08/09 BTA Award - $126,982 STPL Funds - $1,967,000 (reprogrammed to SR-60/Nason FY 10/11); DIF Arterial Streets - $667,048 4 HBRRP Funds - $360,000 for design (remaining balance - $228,067) ° 2005 Lease Revenue Bonds - $3,228,855; RDA Funds - $1,263,584; TE Grant - $1,614,000 (remaining balance - $1,406,900). Grant budgeted in Measure A. RDA funds will be used as local match. 9 TUMF Funds - $679,953; DIF Arterial Streets - $462,239 7 SR2S Grant - $215,820 (remaining balance - $193,283) ° STPL ROW Funds - $1,350,082 - (remaining balance - $1,346,321); STPL Construction Funds - $1,770,219; Federal Demo Construction Funds - $4,500,000 9 SR2S Grant - $210,000 2,279 „9,. 1N301HOV11V RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Date: May 7, 2010 Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Item No. Business Unit Project Name/Limits Project Type Status Total Cost 1,000s Measure A Funding 1 54150 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget Provide cost effective administrative functions for essential transportation projects and services: annual update of 5-Year CIP, revisions to Standard Plans, annual update to DBE specifications, development of DBE AADPL, preparation of grant applications, quarterly utility coordination, MSHCP reporting, and project engineering and right of way services for unfunded new projects. 438 438 2I Indirect Cost Rate Overhead Estimated amount of overhead costs to be distributed to Measure A projects based on projected revenue of 62,270,000. 182 182 3 New Crack Seal (Slurry Seal) Program Budget Facilities pavement rehabilitation work and crack sealing as needed to I prepare for the next slurry seal cycle. 50 50 4 New City -Wide Traffic Signals Program Budget Maintain the City's traffic signal system. Inspect construction of new signals and interconnects. 695 695 5 New City -Wide Concrete Maintenance Program Budget Ensure the safety and convenience of pedestrians using City sidewalks and ensure the proper drainage of City streets by keeping all City sidewalks, curbs, gutters and cross -gutters in good repair. 240 240 6 New City -Wide Sign and Striping Program Budget Maintain City traffic control devices including signs, legends, striping and pavement markings. 812 812 7 New City -Wide Transportation Operations Program Budget Review and mitigate collisions and provide for the safe and efficient operation of the Citys transportation system. 120 120 8 56339 Pavement Rehab -Operations S Maintenance (PROM) Program Rehabilitation Rehabilitation projects under $30,000/each completed by City maintenance staff . 202 202 8 66625 SR-60 Eastbound Ramps/Redlands Bvld. Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Project completed February 2010. Carryover funds are for a one-year warranty period. g g 9 66627 Perris Blvd SB Lane to SR-60 WB On -Ramp Street Improvements Complete design. 460 460 10 66628 Cottonwood Ave./Pattilynn Dr. School Crossing Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Project completed. Carryover funds are for a one-year warranty period. 2 2 11 66629 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Upgrades Street Improvements On -going program for design and construction of ADA compliant curb ramps. 200 200 12 66722 Reche Vista Dr. Realignment/Penis Blvd./Heacock St. to NCL Street Improvements Complete design. Estimated construction date: November 2011. 498 498 13 66729 Heacock Street South Extension Street Improvements Complete alignment and traffic study. 20 20 14 66825 Heacock St. Bridge/PVSD Lateral "A" Bridge Construction: October 2010 to December 2011 2,609 299 15 66829 Nason StJRiverside Co. Regional Medical Center TS Traffic Signal Construction: January 2011 to July 2011. 242 242 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Linda tiVlson Date: May 7, 2010 Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Item No. Business Unit Project Name/Limits Project Type Status Total Cost 1,000s Measure A Funding 16 67428 Pigeon Pass Rd. Widening/Climbing Rose Dr. to NCL Street Improvements Project completed July 2009. Carryover funds are for a one-year warranty period. 23 2 13 17 67524 Aqueduct Bikeway Improvement/Indian St. to Fay Ave. Park Project completed October 2009. Carryover funds are for a one-year warranty period. 5 5 18 82824 Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Hump Program) Street Improvements On -going annual program for design and construction of speed humps. 100 100 19 82828 Indian St./Alessandro Blvd Sidewalk Improvements Street Improvements Construction: May 2010 to July 2010. 100 ' 10 20 84830 Pavement Rehabilitation Program (formerly Slurry Seal Program) Resurface On -going annual program. 50 50 21 85020 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation !On -going annual program. 120 120 22 85523 Street Improvement Program (SIP) Street Improvements On -going annual program. 1,488 388 23 89720 SR-60/Nason St. Interchange Street Improvements Design, utility relocation, right of way and construction. Construction: June 2010 to May 2011 12,409 ° 1,710 24 New A Dracaea Ave. Sidewalk/Morrison St to Mascot Ln. Street Improvements Construction October 2010 to November 2010. 232 5 22 25 New D tasselle St./Margaret Ave. Traffic Signal Traffic Signal 20 20 FY 2010/2011 Total 21,326 " 6,907 " 1 HBRRP Funds - $360,000 for design (remaining balance - $78,983); $2,230,956 construction funding 2 DIF Arterial Streets - $10,000 3 SR2S Grant - $215,820 (remaining balance - $90,000) STPL Construction Funds - $4,737,219; Federal Demo Construction Funds - $4,500,000; DIF Interchange Improvements - $1,740,000 5 SR2S Grant - $210,000 . Includes FY 09/10 carryover funds. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Date: May 7, 2010 Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Item No. Business Unit Project Name/Limits Project Type Status Total Cost 1,000s Measure A Funding 26 54150 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget On -going annual program. 442 442 27 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead Estimated amount of overhead costs to be distributed to Measure A projects based on projected revenue of $2,325,000. 186 186 28 66629 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Upgrades Street Improvements On -going program for design and construction of ADA compliant curb ramps. 200 200 29 66722 Reche Vista Dr. Realignment/Perris Blvd./Heacock St. to NCL Street Improvements Construction: November 2011 to May 2012. 1,027 1,027 30 82824 Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Hump Program) Street Improvements On -going annual program for design and construction of speed humps. 100 100 31 85020 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation On -going annual program. 120 120 32 85523 Street Improvement Program (SIP) Street Improvements On -going annual program. 250 250 33 New D Lasselle St./Margaret Ave. Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Construction 175 175 FY 2011/2012 Total FY 2011/2012 Total 2,325 2,325 * * The projects listed have a recommended appropriation matching the projected revenue forecast by RCTC, dated February 8, 2010. The projects will include carryover from previous years and will be prioritized during the appropriate fiscal year as part of the City budget process. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Date: May 7, 2010 Fiscal Year 201212013 Item No. Business Unit Project Name/Limits Project Type Status Total Cost 1,000s Measure A Funding 34 54150 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget On -going annual program. 400 400 35 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead Estimated amount of overhead costs to be distributed to Measure A projects based on projected revenue of $2,394,000. 192 192 36 56339 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Program Rehabilitation On -going annual program 1,420 ® 170 37 66629 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Upgrades Sidewalk Improvements On -going program for design and construction of ADA compliant curb ramps. 200 200 38 66727 Alessandro Blvd. Raised Median at Gaye St. to Perris Blvd. Median 470 470 39 82824 Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Hump Program) Speed Hump On -going annual program for design'and construction of speed humps. 100 100 40 84830 Pavement Rehabilitation Program (formerly Slurry Seal Program) Resurface On -going annual program. 492 492 41 85020 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation On -going annual program. 120 120 42 85523 Street Improvement Program (SIP) Street Improvements On -going annual program. 250 250 FY 2012f2013 Total 3,644 2,394 6Traffic Congestion Relief (Prop 42) - $1,250,000 The projects listed have a recommended appropriation matching the projected revenue forecast by RCTC, dated February 8, 2010. The projects will include carryover from previous years and will be prioritized during the appropriate fiscal year as part of the City budget process. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Date: May 26, 2009 Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Item No. Business Unit Project Name/Limits Project Type Status Total Cost 1,000s Measure A Funding 43 54150 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget On -going annual program. 400 400 44 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead Estimated amount of overhead costs to be distributed to Measure A projects based on projected revenue of $2,490,000. 199 199 45 56330 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Program Rehabilitation On -going annual program 1,596 346 46 66629 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Upgrades Sidewalk Improvements On -going program for design and construction of ADA compliant curb ramps. 200 200 47 82824 Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Hump Program) Speed Hump On -going annual program for design and construction of speed humps. 100 100 48 84830 Pavement Rehabilitation Program (formerly Slurry Seal Program) Resurface On -going annual program. 875 875 49 85020 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation On -going annual program. 120 120 50 85523 Street Improvement Program (SIP) Street Improvements On -going annual program. 250 250 FY 201312014 Total 3,740 * 2,490 * r Traffic Congestion Relief (Prop 42) - $1,250,000 *The projects listed have a recommended appropriation matching the projected revenue forecast by RCTC, dated February 8, 2010. The projects will include carryover from previous years and will be prioritized during the appropriate fiscal year as part of the City budget process. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2015 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Linda Wilson Date: May 26, 2009 Fiscal Year 2014/2016 Item No. Business Unit Project Name/Limits Project Type Status Total Cost 1,000s Measure A Funding 51 54150 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget On -going annual program. 400 400 52 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead Estimated amount of overhead costs to be distributed to Measure A projects based on projected revenue of $2,615,000. 209 -s 209 53 56330 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Program Rehabilitation On -going annual program 1,586 336 54 66629 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Upgrades Sidewalk Improvements On -going program for design and construction of ADA compliant curb ramps. 200 200 55 56 82824 Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Hump Program) Speed Hump On -going annual program for design and construction of speed humps. 100 100 84830 Pavement Rehabilitation Program (formerly Slurry Seal Program) Resurface On -going annual program. 1,000 1,000 57 85020 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation On -going annual program. 120 120 58 85523 Street Improvement Program (SIP) Street Improvements On -going annual program. 250 250 FY 201412015 Total 3,865 " 2,615 ' 8 Traffic Congestion Relief (Prop 42) - $1,250,000 " The projects listed have a recommended appropriation matching the projected revenue forecast by RCTC, dated February 8, 2010. The projects will include carryover from previous years and will be prioritized during the appropriate fiscal year as part of the City budget process. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned hereby agrees and certifies for the City of Moreno Valley that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Date: Wifftam Bopf Interim City Manager ATTEST: Reviewed By: Steve Elam Interim Financial & Administrative Services Director Reviewed By: Chris A. Vogt, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer ATTACHMENT "C" CITY OF MORENO VALLEY MOE Projection for FY 2009-10 County of Riverside Measure "A" 1/2 Cent Sales Tax 2009-10 Projected Fund Description Actuals 010 53110 Public Works - Transportation Engineering 893,021 010 53310 Public Works - Traffic Signal Maintenance 674,533 010 54110 Public Works - Street Projects Engineering 9,214 010 55110 Public Works - Street Maintenance 0 010 55410 Public Works - Signing/Striping 0 121 Gas Tax Transfer from General Fund 644,153 $2,220,921 ATTACHMENT "D" 89360 SM, TT, AZ, GA CITY OF MURRIETA June 15, 2010 Ms. Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502 SUBJECT: Measure A - FY 2010-2015 Streets and Roads Five Year Program Dear Ms. Trevino, Our five-year Measure A Program and Certification of Maintenance Effort is attached for your consideration and approval. Please refer to the descriptions below for the status of projects under construction or design in the Measure A Program for FY 2009-10. CIP 8043 Pavement Resurfacing — Asphalt Overlay This item provides for asphalt overlay of major and collector streets as determined by the citywide pavement management program. The City completed a major asphalt overlay project in FY 09-10. Any remaining funds in the Pavement Resurfacing — Asphalt Overlay project account will be carried over to FY 10-11. CIP 8051 Monroe Ave: Symphony Park to Los Alamos Road This project is 100% complete and was opened for traffic in August 2009 prior to opening of the adjacent new high school. CIP 8059 Guava Street: Jefferson Ave to Murrieta Creek Engineering design and environmental review is approximately 90% complete. CIP 8311 I-15 Overcrossing (a, Los Alamos Road The combined PSR/PR was approved by Caltrans in May 2010. CIP 8323 Guava Bridge over Murrieta Creek Engineering design and environmental review is approximately 75%. Construction planned for 2011. CIP 8335 Jackson Ave @ Warm Springs Creek Engineering design and environmental review is approximately 90% complete. 1 Town Square, 24601 Jefferson Avenue • Murrieta, California 92562 phone: 951.304.CITY (2489) • fax: 951.698.4509 • web: murrieta.org X.29.22 Page 2 Ms. Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Measure A — FY 2010-2015 Streets and Roads 5 Year Program CIP 8380 Jefferson Ave Widening at Ballesteros Engineering design and environmental review approximately 50% complete. Construction will be delayed due to delay of Palomar Street project in City of Wildomar. CIP 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program The City Council has adopted a Neighborhood Traffic Management Program and these funds will install the improvements approved via the program. CIP 8432 Clinton Keith/Meadowlark Lane This traffic signal project design/environmental is under way and being coordinated with the County of Riverside project for Clinton Keith Road and our own Meadowlark Lane improvements. CIP 8433 Murrieta Hot Springs Medians: Alta Murrieta to Margarita Engineering design and environmental review approximately 95% complete. Construction planned for 2011. CIP 8257 Citywide Signal Modifications Plans prepared for modification of 3 traffic signals on California Oaks Road complete. Construction started in June 2010. CIP 8438 Priority Traffic Signals Plans prepared for installation of 2 new traffic signals at Jefferson Ave/Nutmeg St. and Monroe Ave/Jackson Ave. Construction planned for 2011. Sinc Patrick A. Titas, Public Works Director/City Engineer cc: Rick Dudley, City Manager Jim Holston, Assistant City Manager Joy Canfield, Finance Director Bob Moehling, Engineering Manager Jeff Hitch, Associate Engineer RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010-2011 Agency: City of Murrieta Page: 1 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Thomas, Public Works Director Phone #: (951) 461-6078 Date: 6/15/2010 Item # Project Name / Limits 1 CIP 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Overlay 2 CIP 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program 3 Debt Service - COP 2007 for 1-15 & I-215 Interchanges @ Murrieta Hot Springs Rd and 1-215 Interchange @ Clinton Keith 4 CIP 8051 Monroe Avenue: Symphohy Park to Los Alamos Rd 5 CIP 8257 Citywide Signals Modification 6 CIP 8330 Traffic Signal Optimazation/Congestion 7 CIP 8348 Traffic Signal Fiberoptic Interconnect 8 CIP 8079 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd Widening: Margarita to Date 9 CIP 8389 Whitewood Rd Widening: Hunter to Clinton Keith Rd 10 CIP 8433 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd Median: Alta to Margarita Total Project Type Maintenance Construction Debt Service Construction Construction Maintenance Construction Construction Construction Construction Total Cost $ 2,272,556 $ $ 153,254 $ $ 732,264 $ $ 298,444 $ $ 484,882 $ $ - $ $ 121,141 $ $ 2,500,000 $ $ 1,244,491 $ $ 903,929 $ Measure A Funds 2,272,556 153,254 732,264 130,543 174,601 121,140 1,458,281 1,085,000 444,569 $ 6,572,208 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011-2012 Agency: City of Murrieta Page: 2 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Thomas, Public Works Director Phone #: (951) 461-6078 Date: 6/15/2010 item # 1 2 3 4 5 6 Project Name / Limits CIP 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Overlay Debt Service - COP 2007 for I-15 & 1-215 Interchanges @ Murrieta Hot Springs Rd and 1-215 Interchange @ Clinton Keith CIP 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program CIP 8257 Citywide Signals Modifications CIP 8330 Traffic Signal Optimization/Congestion Management CIP 8348 Traffic Signal Fiber Optic Interconnect Total Project Type Maintenance Debt Service Construction Construction Construction Construction Total Cost $ 548,400 $ 726,489 $ 100,000 $ 174,070 $ 138,950 $ 100,000 Measure A Funds $ 548,400 $ 726,489 $ 100,000 $ 174,070 $ 68,950 $ 100,000 $ 1,803,807 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012-2013 Agency: City of Murrieta Page: 3 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Thomas, Public Works Director Phone #: (951) 461-6078 Date: 6/15/2010 Item # Project Name / Limits 1 CIP 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Overlay 2 Debt Service - COP 2007 for 1-15 & 1-215 Interchanges @ Murrieta Hot Springs Rd and 1-215 Interchange @ Clinton Keith 3 CIP 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program 4 CIP 8257 Citywide Signals Modification 5 CIP 8330 Traffic Signal Optimization/Congestion Management 6 CIP 8348 Traffic Signal Fiber Optic Interconnect Total Project Type Maintenance Debt Service Construction Construction Construction Construction Total Cost $ 564,800 Measure A Funds $ 564,800 $ 728,833 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 178,230 $ $ 141,000 $ $ 100,000 $ 728,833 100,000 178,230 71,000 100,000 $ 1,742,863 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013-2014 Agency: City of Murrieta Page: 4 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Thomas, Public Works Director Phone #: (951) 461-6078 Date: 6/15/2010 Item # Project Name / Limits 1 CIP 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Overlay 2 Debt Service - COP 2007 for 1-15 & 1-215 Interchanges @ Murrieta Hot Springs Rd and 1-215 Interchange @ Clinton Keith 3 CIP 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program 4 CIP 8257 Citywide Signals Modifications 5 CIP 8330 Traffic Signal Optimization/Congestion 6 CIP 8348 Traffic Signal Fiber Optic Interconnect Total Project Type Maintenance Debt Service Construction Construction Construction Construction Total Cost $ 587,600 $ 730,183 $ 100,000 $ 183,560 $ 143,100 $ 100,000 Measure A Funds $ 587,600 $ 730,183 $ 100,000 $ 183,560 $ 73,100 $ 100,000 $ 1,774,443 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014-2015 Agency: City of Murrieta Page: 5 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Thomas, Public Works Director Phone #: (951) 461-6078 Date: 6/15/2010 hem # 1 2 3 4 5 6 Project Name / Limits CIP 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Overlay Debt Service - COP 2007 for I-15 & 1-215 Interchanges @ Murrieta Hot Springs Rd and 1-215 Interchange @ Clinton Keith CIP 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program CIP 8257 Citywide Signals Modifications CIP 8330 Traffic Signal Optimization/Congestion CIP 8348 Traffic Signal Fiber Optic Interconnect Total Project Type Maintenance Debt Service Construction Construction Construction Construction Total Cost $ 616,800 $ 730,183 $ 100,000 $ 190,970 $ 144,562 $ 100,000 Measure A Funds $ 616,800 $ 730,183 $ 100,000 $ 190,970 $ 74,562 $ 100,000 $ 1,812,515 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for city of Murrieta (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: Ud— , 20b0 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: 1.0714& . SECRETARY 89205 TT, SM, AZ, GA CITY of NORCO CITY HALL • 2870 CLARK AVENUE • NORCO CA 92860 • (951) 736-3900 • FAX (951) 270-5622 May 21, 2010 Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 DLcil�I[ • MAY 2t RIVERSIDE: CUUtijr TRANSPORTATlgti COmiSsiON RE: 2011 — 2015 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans Dear Ms. Trevino: The City of Norco is pleased to submit for your consideration and approval our Five - Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Program projections, commencing with Fiscal Year 2010/11. Also, included for your records is the Annual Certification of the City's "Maintenance of Effort" document signed by the City Manager, Beth Groves. If you have any additional questions, regarding the City of Norco 2010 submittal, please contact me at 951-270-5607. We appreciate your cooperation and assistance with the City of Norco's planned expenditures for maintenance and capital improvements to our local streets and roads. Thank You, William R. Thompson Director of Public Works City of Norco Attachments: Measure "A" 5-Year CIP Maintenance of Effort Letter CITY COUNCIL MALCOLM MILLER BERWIN HANNA Mayor Mayor Pro Tem KATHY AZEVEDO KEVIN BASH Council Member Council Member HARVEY SULLIVAN Council Member X.29.13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A n LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2009 - 2010 Completed Projects Agency: CITY OF NORCO Page 1 of 7 Prepared by: WILLIAM R. THOMPSON Phone # 951-270-5607 Date: Ma v 1, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Unspecified Pavement Overlays (Hamner Ave.) Overlay/Reconstruction 150 150 2. Sixth Street — California Ave. to Crestview Dr. Reconstruction 50 50 3. Street Striping — Various Locations Striping 25 25 5. Traffic Signal — Sixth St./Hamner Ave. Signals 50 50 6. Misc. Pavement Repairs Asphalt Maintenance 50 50 7. Misc. Seal Coats Seal Coats 25 25 8. Traffic Signal Improvements — Various Signals 22 22 9. Unspecified Pavement (Sierra Avenue) Overlay/Reconstruction 150 150 10. Misc. Reconstruction Projects (Hamner Ave.) Reconstruction 100 100 Preprint/users/ri/measureA5yrfonn RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A"LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 Agency: CITY OF NORCO Page 2 of 7 Prepared by: WILLIAM R. THOMPSON Phone # 951-270-5607 Date: MAY 1, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay 150 150 2. Rocky View — Hilltop Lane Overlay 75 75 3. Hillside Ave. — Sixth St. to River Dr. Overlay 200 200 4. Unspecified Rehabilitation and Overlay Overlay/Reconstruction 200 200 5. Hillside Ave. — Second St. to Third St. Overlay/Reconstruction 250 250 6. Reservoir Dr. — Corona Ave. to Temescal Ave. Overlay/Reconstruction 50 50 7. Golden Gate Circle, Hilltop Lane Overlay/Reconstruction 25 25 8. Corona Ave.. — First St. to Second St.. Overlay/Reconstruction 275 275 9. Temescal Ave. — Second St. to Fourth St. Overlay 300 300 10. Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 100 100 11. Crestview Dr. — North Dr. to Sixth St. Design 50 50 12. Sierra Ave. — Fourth St. to Third St. Reconstruction 100 100 Preprint/users/ri/measureASyrform RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A "LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY2010 - 2011 Agency: CITY OF NORCO Page 3 of 7 Prepared by: WILLIAM R. THOMPSON Phone # 951-270-5607 Date: MAY 1, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 13. Traffic Signal Improvements — Fifth St. Signal 50 50 14. First St. — Parkridge, Lincoln — Grant Match Signal 12.5 12.5 15. Street Striping Striping 30 30 16. Miscellaneous Seal Coats Seal Coat 50 50 17. Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs Street Maintenance 40 40 18. Community center Parking Lot Expansion Reconstruction 100 100 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. Preprint/ users/n/measureA5yrform RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2012 Agency: CITY OF NORCO Page 4 of 7 Prepared by: WILLIAM R. THOMPSON Phone # 951-270-5607 Date: MAY 1, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay 150 150 2. Unspecified Rehabilitation and Overlay Overlay 200 200 3. N/S River Road — E. of Bluff St. Overlay 50 50 4. Norconian Dr. — Fifth St. to Sixth St. Overlay/Reconstruction 200 200 5. Misc. Reconstruction Projects Overlay/Reconstruction 200 200 6. Crestview Dr. — North Dr. to Sixth St. Overlay/Reconstruction 300 300 7. Traffic Signal Improvements Signals 50 50 8. Street Striping Striping 30 30 9. Miscellaneous Seal Coats Seal Coat 50 50 10. Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs Street Maintenance 40 40 11. 12. 13. 14. Preprint/ users/ri/measureA5yrform RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A "LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY2012 - 2013 Agency: CITY OF NORCO Page 5 of 7 Prepared by: WILLIAM R. THOMPSON Phone # 951-270-5607 Date: MAY 1, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay 150 150 2. Unspecified Rehabilitation and Overlay Overlay 200 200 3. Misc. Reconstruction Projects Overlay/Reconstruction 200 200 4. TUMF Projects Match Overlay/Reconstruction 25 25 5. Traffic Signal Improvements Signal 15 15 6. Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs Street Maintenance 50 50 7. Miscellaneous Seal Coats Seal Coat 40 40 8. Street Striping Striping 25 25 9. 10. 11. 12. Preprint/ users/n/measureA5yrfonn RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A H LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 Agency: CITY OF NORCO Page 6 of 7 Prepared by: WILLIAM R. THOMPSON Phone # 951-270-5607 Date: MAY 1, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay 150 150 2. Unspecified Rehabilitation and Overlay Overlay/Reconstruction 150 150 3. Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 150 150 4. Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs Street Maintenance 50 50 5. Traffic Signal Improvements Signal 10 10 6. Miscellaneous Seal Coats Seal Coat 40 40 7. Street Striping Striping 25 25 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. reprint/ users/ n/ measure Asyrtorm RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A "LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Agency: CITY OF NORCO Page 7 of 7 Prepared by: WILLIAM R. THOMPSON Phone # 951-270-5607 Date: MAY 1, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay 150 150 2. Unspecified Rehabilitation and Overlay Overlay/Reconstruction 150 150 3. Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 100 100 4. Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs Street Maintenance 40 40 5. Traffic Signal Improvements Signal 10 10 6. Miscellaneous Seal Coats Seal Coat 40 40 7. Street Striping Striping 25 25 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. repusers/ n / measure y orm RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY2015 - 2016 Agency: CITY OF NORCO Page 8 of 8 Prepared by: WILLIAM R. THOMPSON Phone # 951-270-5607 Date: MAY 1, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1. Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay 250 250 2. Unspecified Rehabilitation and Overlay Overlay/Reconstruction 500 500 3. Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 200 200 4. Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs Street Maintenance 50 50 5. Traffic Signal Improvements Signal 50 50 6. Miscellaneous Seal Coats Seal Coat 50 50 7. Street Striping Striping 0 0 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Preprint/ usershij measu reA5yrfor MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Norco (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that a failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure "A" funds. Dated:S ,2010 89123 TT, SM CITY Of NU DEMI 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760 346—o6i ► FAX: 760 341-7098 info@palm-deserr.org May 07, 2010 Shirley Medina Planning and Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92502-2208 IJ �� MAY 11 2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Subject: Five -Year Measure A Capital Improvement Program Dear Shirley, Enclosed for Commission consideration is the City of Palm Desert's proposed 2010/2011 — 2014/2015 Five -Year Measure A Capital Improvement Program, as well as the Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement and calculation documentation. The Five -Year Program will be reviewed in the near future by our City Council. If the City Council makes any changes to the program, a revised version will be submitted to you for approval. If no changes are made, please treat this as the official submittal. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Alana Townsend of my staff, or me. Alana can be reached at (760) 346-0611 ext. 453, and I can be reached at (760) 346-0611 ext. 469. Sincerel Mark Greer�Twood, F . Director of Public Works Enclosure cc: John M. Wohlmuth, City Manager J. Luis Espinoza, Assistant Director of Finance Alana Townsend, Senior Management Analyst R 6r� iAlA1FU 0X A[(Y(ffG V.lffA X.29.14 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 City of Palm Desert Mark Greenwood 760-346-0611 ext. 469 May 7, 2010 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($ono s) 1. Fred Waring Drive Right Turn Pocket at Hwy. 111 Street Project 775 600 2. Hwy. 111 Sidewalk & Plaza Way Intersection Improvements Street Project 1,900 500 3. Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring Drive to Country Club Drive Roadway Widening 6,500 2,000 4. Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue Improvements Street Project 3,123 2,550 Prepmt/usersM/measureA5yrform Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2012 City of Palm Desert Mark Greenwood 760-346-0611 ext. 469 May 7, 2010 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 1. Portola Interchange @ 1-10 On-ramp/Off-ramp construction 74,500 12,000 2. Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring Roadway Widening 6,500 4,000 Drive to Country Club Drive 3. Street Resurfacing Maintenance Street Project 8,000 1,000 Preprnt/userstri/measureA5yrform Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012 - 2013 City of Palm Desert Mark Greenwood 760-346-0611 ext. 469 May 7, 2010 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO, PROJECT NAME 1 LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 1. Street Resurfacing Maintenance Street Project 8,000 2,000 Preprnt/users/n/measureA5yrform Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 City of Palm Desert Mark Greenwood 760-346.0611 ext. 469 May 7, 2010 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 1. Street Resurfacing Maintenance Street Project 8,000 2,000 Preprnt/users/n/measureA5yrform RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by: Mark Greenwood Phone #: 760-346-0611 ext. 469 Date: May 7, 2010 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'8) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 1. Street Resurfacing Maintenance Street Project 8,000 2,000 Prepmf/users/ri/measureA5yrform MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Palm Desert ("Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines approved by the Commission at its July 8m 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: May 6, 2010 CITY OF PALM DESERT MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CALCULATION ESTIMATED FOR FYE 6/30/10 as of 4/30/10 Ledgers Period 10 BASED ON DISCRETIONARY FUNDS GENERAL FUND 110 DEPT # A B C LESS: EQUALS: Sub -totals NC/ ACCOUNT INELIGIBLE ELIGIBLE TOTAL EXPENSES EXPENSES FOR MOE 4300 PW ADMINISTRATION SALARIES and 1.673.045.82 1001-1125 2.377,316.43 1,426389.86 950,926.57 BENEFITS 704,270.61 SUPPLIES 2110-2190 4,888.04 2,932.82 1,955.22 PROF/TECHNICAL 3003-3091 32,150.80 19,290.48 12,860.32 OTHER SRVCS & CHGS 31103125 6,458.96 3.874.18 2,582.78 3330-3340 2,500.00 1,500.00 1,000.00 36103660 7.809.53 4,686.72 3,123.81 CAPITAL OUTLAY 10% or 0 4040-4045 0.00 0.00 0.00 4310 PW-Street & Maintenance SALARIES and 1,141,771.95 1001-1125 1,717,733.43 687,093.37 1,030,640.06 BENEFITS 575,961.48 SUPPLIES 2110-2190 15,739.97 6,295.99 9.443.98 31103125 7,870.48 3,148.19 4,722.29 3320 238,954.60 95,581.84 143,372.76 3345 8,517.25 3,406.90 5,110.35 3430 5,073.15 2,029.26 3,043.89 3510 4,348.63 1,739.45 2,609.18 3630-3650 465.00 186.00 279.00 • 3910 46,854.00 46,854.00 0.00 GRAFFITI PROGRAM 3915 27.926.09 27,926.09 0,00 CAPITAL OUTLAY 10% or 0 4045 0.00 0.00 0.00 4311 Street Resurfacing Repairs & Maintenance 3320 666,137.85 666,137.85 4312 Curb & Gutter Repairs & Maintenance 3320 52,093.39 52.093.39 4313 Parking Lot Maintenance Repairs&Maintenance 3320 0.00 0.00 0.00 4314 Stone Drain Maintenance Repairs & Maintenance 3320 0.00 0.00 4315 Striping Repairs & Maintenance 3320 0.00 0.00 Gas Tax offset 903.059.73 (906,05'3.73) 4250 Street Lighting/Traffic Safety Supplies 2145/55 118,733.74 118,733.74 R&M -Signals 3325/70 65,132.46 65,132.46 Utilities -Electric 3514 101,409.28 101,409.28 0.00 Telephone line 3650 4,225.75 4,225.75 0.00 CAPITAL OUTLAY 10% or 0 4045 0.00 0.00 0.00 4330 Corp YardlOVERHEAD EXP Supplies 213012174 0.00 0.00 R&M/Utilities/Others 3310-3695 45,860.66 18,344.26 27,516.40 4045 0.00 0.00 0.00 4331 PW-Maint/Equipment- 4614 Maintenance of Medians 4614 UdIRy for Medians 2110.2190 97,467.11 34,113.49 63,353.62 3054 10,161.73 5,080.87 5,080.87 3340/3640 194,919.80 68,221.93 126,697.87 4045 131,145.76 131,145.76 0.00 3370 370 426.71 370,426.71 3510/3514 103,514.85 103,514.85 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 6,465,833.45 4,075,47678 2390,356.67 CITY Of PERI DESERT 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760 346-0611 FAX: 760 341-7098 info @ palm-dcscrc.org May 7, 2010 Shirley Medina Planning and Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92502-2208 Subject: Project Status Report — Measure "A" Projects Prior Year Plan - Fiscal Year Ending (FYE) June 30, 2010 Dear Shirley, At the beginning of the 09/10 Fiscal Year, the City of Palm Desert had seven projects with Measure "A° funding. Included within these nine projects were projects being continued from the previous year, and projects scheduled for the 08/09 Fiscal Year. Status of the seven projects is as follows: On -going projects: 1. Portola Interchange @ 1-10 2. Cook Street Intersection Improvements (renamed from "Cook Street Widening" and scope was reduced) 3. Monterey Avenue / 1-10 Ramp Modifications 4. Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring Drive to Country Club Drive 5. Portola Avenue / Frank Sinatra Intersection Improvements 6. Fred Waring Drive Right Turn Pocket at Hwy. 111 7. Hwy. 111 Sidewalk & Plaza Way Intersection Improvements New projects FY 09/10: 8. Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue Improvements Enclosed is the City of Palm Desert's Project Status Report for Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Prior Year Plan (FYE June 30, 2010). The amounts in the "Measure A Money Remaining" column are current as of the date of this letter, but are subject to change before June 30, 2010. tot PROPER ax RECYCLED PAVER Project Status Report May 7, 2010 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Alana Townsend of my staff, or me. Alana can be reached at (760) 346-0611, ext. 453, and I can be reached at (760) 346-0611, ext. 469. Sincere! Mark Grewood, P.E. Director of Public Works Enclosures as noted cc: John M. Wohlmuth, City Manager J. Luis Espinoza, Assistant Director of Finance Alana Townsend, Senior Management Analyst CITY Of PIM DESERT "PROMO OM tFfY(If0IMO G.1PubWorkslAlana TownsendlRCTC1RCTC 10-1 1 \Project Status Report Letter 6-30-10.docx CITY OF PALM DESERT MEASURE "A" PROJECT STATUS REPORT FYE JUNE 30, 2010 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME STATUS/COMMENTS EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE Measure "A" Money Remaining 637-02 Portola Interchange @ I-10 In Environmental and preliminary engineering phase. September 2015 4,000 601-05 Cook Street Intersection Improvements Acquiring right of way; Design is complete. September 2011 3,693 669-02 Monterey Avenue / I-10 Ramp Modifications PSE complete, acquiring right of way. December 2011 8,318 640-07 Monterey Avenue Widening from Fred Waring to Country Club Developing concept allignment plans. June 2014 500 572-08 Portola Avenue / Frank Sinatra Intersection Improvements Design complete. May 2011 3,407 658-08 Fred Waring Drive Right Turn Pocket at Hwy. 111 Pending environmental approval, design 60% complete. September 2011 p 146 697-05 Hwy. 111 Sidewalk & Plaza Way Intersection Improvements Finalizing design and environmental documents. Septebmer 2011 971 656-06 Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue Improvements Initiating design. October 2011 573 RCTC project status report 6-30-10 89128 TT, SM City of Palm Springs Department of Public Works and Engineering 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs, California 92262 Tel: (760) 323-8253 • Fax: (760) 322-8360 • Web: www.ci.palm-springs.ca.us May 6, 2010 Ms. Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Road Program Proposed City of Palm Springs Annual 5-Year Measure "A" Plan (Fiscal Year 2010/2011 - 2014/2016) Dear Ms. Trevino: Enclosed, at RCTC's request, is the City's proposed Local Measure "A" (Local Streets & Roads) 5-year Plan for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 through 2014/2015. The 2011-2015 Plan includes projects carried overfrom the current Fiscal Year 2009/2010 to Fiscal Year 2010/2011. The "Maintenance of Effort" (MOE) Calculation and Certification for Fiscal Year 2011-2015 are also attached as requested. If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 323- 8253, extension 8732. David J. Barakian Director of Public Works/City Engineer enc cc: David H. Ready, City Manager Tom Wilson, Assistant City Manager Geoffrey Kiehl, Director of Finance/Treasurer Nancy Klukan, Asst. Director of Finance Marcus Fuller, Asst. Director of Public Works/Asst. City Engineer Post Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 X.29.15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: David J. Barakian, Director of Public Works/City Engineer (by Marcus L. Fuller, Assistant Director of Public Works/Assistant City Engineer) Date: May 6, 2010 Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street 8 Roads Program Fiscal Year 2009/2010 continued to 2010/2011 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS 1 Bridge Repairs (Remaining funds to be used with future project) Bridge Maintenance $214,727 $214,727 2 Belardo Road Bridge (Currently in right of way/final design phase) New Road Extension and Bridge Construction $4,400,000 $999,689 3 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave) (Currently in right of way/final design phase) Roadway and Bridge Widening $4,400,000 $221,135 4 Indian Avenue/1-10 Interchange (Currently in construction phase) Expanded Freeway Interchange $18,000,000 $730,381 5 Gene Autry Trail/I-10 Interchange (Currently in construction phase) Expanded Freeway Interchange $18,000,000 $1,314,511 6 Gene Autry Trail UPRR Bridge Widening (Currently in construction phase) Bridge Widening $4,000,000 $448,578 7 Indian Canyon Drive UPRR Bridge Widening (Currently in right of way/final design phase) Bridge Widening "Included in Item 3 above $178,307 8 Indian Canyon Drive Widening (Tramview Road to UPRR) (Currently in right of way/final design phase) Roadway Widening $5,000,000 $149,931 Page 1 of 2 Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Roads Program Fiscal Year 2009/2010 continued to 2010/2011 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS 9 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation (Currently in environmental phase) Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation $4,888,950 $71,364 10. Ramon Widening Study (Currently in preliminary planning sphase) Planning Study $100,000 $46,207 11. Traffic Signal Interconnect (Funding for future project) Traffic Signal Improvements $25,000 $25,000 12 Safe Routes to School Local Match (Funding for Cycle 8 grant) Sidewalk Improvements $400,000 $16,607 13. Indian Canyon Drive at Vista Chino (SR111) Traffic Signal Modification / Upgrade Traffic Signal Improvements $200,000 $7,162 14. Citywide Traffic Signal Interconnect Upgrade/Traffic Management Center (CMAQ Grant Local Share) Traffic Signal Improvements $2,100,000 $26,043 TOTAL 2009/2010 CONTINUED TO 2010/2011 $61,728,677 $4,449,642 Note: Measure A funds are existing local Measure A funds balances in current accounts as of May 6, 2010. Page 2 of 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: David J. Barakian, Director of Public Works/City Engineer (by Marcus L. Fuller, Assistant Director of Public Works/Assistant City Engineer) Date: May 6, 2010 Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street 8 Roads Program Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Status Report ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT STATUS 1. ARHM Overlays (Various Streets) This project is under construction. 2. Annual Street Slurry Seals (Various Streets) This project is under construction. 3. SB 821 Sidewalk Grant (08/09) (Farrell Drive, Andreas Road to Amado Road) (Ramon Road, Calle Encilia to Warm Sands) This project is complete. 4 Baristo Road at Palm Springs High School Pedestrian Traffic Signal (Construction) This project is complete. 5 Indian Canyon Drive at Vista Chino (SR111) Traffic Signal Modification / Upgrade (Design Only) This project is in design. 6. Traffic Safety Projects This project is complete. 7. Safe Routes to School Grant (07/08) Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Improvements (Various Locations) This project is complete. 8 Ramon Road Widening (including bridge widening) Landau Blvd to San Luis Rey Dr This project is in design. 9. Mid Valley Parkway Reimbursement (CVAG) This is an on -going annual reimbursement to CVAG. 10. Indian Canyon Drive Widening (UPRR to Garnet Ave) This project is completing right-of-way and final design phase. 11. Indian Canyon Drive Widening (Tramview Road to UPRR) This project is completing the environmental phase. Page 1 of 2 Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Roads Program Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Status Report ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT STATUS 12. Bridge Repairs Consultant selection for engineering design to be scheduled. 13. Belardo Road Bridge This project is completing the right-of-way and final design phase. 14. Gene Autry Trail / Interstate 10 Interchange This project is in construction. 15. Traffic Signal Interconnect Communication Upgrade Consultant selection for engineering design to be scheduled. Page 2 of 2 Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Roads Program Fiscal Year 2010/2011 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: David J. Barakian, Director of Public Works/City Engineer (by Marcus L. Fuller, Assistant Director of Public Works/Assistant City Engineer) Date: May 6, 2010 Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Roads Program Fiscal Year 2010/2011 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS 1. Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation "Included on previous sheet $830,000 2. Asphalt Street Overlay (Various Locations) Street Maintenance $500,000 $500,000 3. Annual Street Slurry Seal (Various Locations) Street Maintenance $500,000 $500,000 4. Farrell Drive at Ramon Road Traffic Signal Modification Modified Traffic Signal $200,000 $200,000 5 Indian Canyon Drive at Vista Chino (SR111) Traffic Signal Modification / Upgrade Modified Traffic Signal $225,000 $200,000 6. SB 821 Sidewalk Project (FY 10/11) Sidewalk Construction $90,000 $30,000 7. Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Signal Modifications $40,000 $40,000 8. Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $10,422 $10,422 TOTAL Fiscal Year 2010/2011 $1,565,422 $2,395,422 Page 1 of 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: David J. Barakian, Director of Public Works/City Engineer (by Marcus L. Fuller, Assistant Director of Public Works/Assistant City Engineer) Date: May 6, 2010 Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Roads Program Fiscal Year 2011/2012 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS P PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS 1 Baristo Road Reconstruction (Palm Canyon Drive to west end) Street Maintenance $2,000,000 $1,000,000 2. Annual Street Slurry Seal (Various Locations) Street Maintenance $500,000 $500,000 3. Asphalt Street Overlay (Various Locations) Street Maintenance $500,000 $500,000 4 Ramon Road Widening (Sunrise Way to El Cielo Rd) Roadway Widening $4,000,000 $250,000 5. Mesquite Ave. at El Cielo Rd. Traffic Signal Installation New Traffic Signal $150,000 $150,000 6. Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Signal Modifications $40,000 $40,000 7. SB 821 Sidewalk Project (FY 11/12) Sidewalk Construction $90,000 $30,000 8 Gene Autry Trail/Dinah Shore Drive Intersection (Preliminary Alignment Study) Intersection Improvements $25,000 $25,000 9. Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $10,422 $10,422 TOTAL Fiscal Year 2011/2012 $7,315,422 $2,505,422 Page 1 of 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: David J. Barakian, Director of Public Works/City Engineer (by Marcus L. Fuller, Assistant Director of Public Works/Assistant City Engineer) Date: May 6, 2010 Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Roads Program Fiscal Year 2012/2013 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS 1. Annual Street Overlay (Various Streets) Street Maintenance $500,000 $500,000 2. Annual Street Slurry Seals (Various Streets) Street Maintenance $500,000 $500,000 3. Baristo Road Reconstruction Street Maintenance "Included on previous sheet $500,000 4. Gene Autry Trail/Dinah Shore Drive Intersection Intersection Improvements $450,000 $450,000 5 S. Palm Canyon Dr. Low Water Crossing Bridge Replacement (HBP Grant) New Bridge 9 $3,100,000 $400,000 6. Indian Canyon Drive UPRR Bridge Widening Bridge Widening "Included on previous sheet $300,000 7. Alejo Road at Avenida Caballeros Traffic Signal New Traffic Signal $200,000 $200,000 8. Date Palm Drive/I-10 Interchange Expanded Freeway Interchange $824,000 $100,000 9. Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Signal Modifications $40,000 $40,000 10. SB 821 Sidewalk Project (FY 12/13) Sidewalk Construction $90,000 $30,000 11. Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $10,422 $10,422 TOTAL Fiscal Year 2012/2013 $5,714,422 $3,030,422 Page 1 of 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: David J. Barakian, Director of Public Works/City Engineer (by Marcus L. Fuller, Assistant Director of Public Works/Assistant City Engineer) Date: May 6, 2010 Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Roads Program Fiscal Year 2013/2014 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS 1 Ramon Road Widening (Sunrise Way to El Cielo Rd) Roadway Widening *Included on previous sheet $2,000,000 2. Annual Street Slurry Seal Street Maintenance $500,000 $500,000 3. Annual Street Overlay Street Maintenance $400,000 $400,000 4. Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Signal Modifications $40,000 $40,000 5. SB 821 Sidewalk Project (FY 13/14) Sidewalk Construction $90,000 $30,000 6. Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement- CVAG Street Improvements $10,422 $10,422 TOTAL Fiscal Year 2013/2014 $1,040,422 $3,040,422 Page 1 of 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: David J. Barakian, Director of Public Works/City Engineer (by Marcus L. Fuller, Assistant Director of Public Works/Assistant City Engineer) Date: May 6, 2010 Fiscal Year 2011-2015, 5-Year Measure "A" Local Street & Roads Program Fiscal Year 2014/2015 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS 1. Annual Street Slurry Seal Street Maintenance $500,000 $500,000 2. Annual Street Overlay Street Maintenance $400,000 $400,000 3. Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Signal Modifications $40,000 $40,000 4. SB 821 Sidewalk Project (FY 14/15) Sidewalk Construction $90,000 $30,000 5. Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement - CVAG Street Improvements $10 422 $10,422 TOTAL Fiscal Year 2013/2014 $1,040,422 $1,040,422 Page 1 of 1 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for l he. C ► � � Palm J f pihe "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be .used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: Ra\ (ci aOIO CITY MANAGER ATTEST: SECRETARY CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA Report on Agreed -Upon Procedures Applied to the Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Year Ended June 30, 2009 r MHM Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. An Independent CPA Firm 2301 Dupont Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, Califomia 92612 949-474-2020 ph 949-263-5520 fx www.mhrmpc.com Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON APPLYING AGREED -UPON PROCEDURES We have performed the procedures enumerated below, which were agreed to by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), solely to assist RCTC in determining whether the City of Palm Springs, California (City) was in compliance with the Measure A Local Street and Roads Program grant terms and conditions for the year ended June 30, 2009. The City's management is responsible for the accounting records. This agreed -upon procedures engagement was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The sufficiency of the procedures is solely the responsibility of those parties specified in the report. Consequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described below, either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other purpose. The procedures performed and the results of those procedures were as follows: 1. We reviewed the 1989 Measure A (Ordinance 88-1) compliance requirements. Although the 2009 Measure A (Ordinance 02-001) is not effective until July 1, 2009, Western County jurisdictions are required to participate in the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program, which is administered by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 2. We obtained the City's approved Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) from RCTC for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. .Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 3. We obtained a detailed general ledger and balance sheet from the City for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. a. We identified the amount of Measure A cash and investments recorded at June 30, 2009. 1 Board of Commissioners Riverside. County Transportation Commission Riverside, California Results: The City recorded Measure A cash and investments in the amount of $7,599,806 as of June 30, 2009. b. We identified amounts due from other funds. Results: There were no amounts due from other funds as of June 30, 2009. c. We identified reservations or designations of ending fund balance for the Measure A activity. Results: The City has recorded the following fund balance as of June 30, 2009. Reserved for continuing appropriations $12,499,270 Unreserved (4,703,723) Total fund balance $ 7,795,547 d. We identified the existence of any restatement of Measure A fund balance and inquired of management as to the reason for any restatement. Results: The City has not restated Measure A fund balance. 4. We obtained an operating statement for Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 (see Exhibit A), including budget amounts. a. We reviewed the revenues in the operating statement. We inquired of management as to what fund is used to record Measure A revenues received from RCTC for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, and documented what the total revenues were for the fiscal year. Results: The City accounts for Measure A revenue received from RCTC in its Measure A Improvements Fund (Fund #134). The City has recorded total revenues in the amount of $2,554,832 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. ii. We obtained a listing of Measure A payments made from RCTC to the City. We compared the Measure A revenue recorded by the City to the listing of payments made by RCTC. Results: We identified the following variance between the Measure A revenue recorded by the City in comparison to the RCTC Measure A payment schedule. 2 Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, Califomia Measure A payments made by RCTC Measure A revenue recorded by City Variance $1,330,779 1,217.807 $ 112,972 The variance was due to the City not having received the final payment from RCTC as of the date of completion of our fieldwork. iii. We determined the amount of interest allocated to the Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Results: The City allocated interest in the amount of $144,803 to the Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. b. We reviewed the expenditures in the operating statement. i. We inquired of management as to what fund is used to record Measure A expenditures and what the total expenditures were for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Results: The City accounts for Measure A expenditures in its Measure A Improvements Fund (Fund #134). The City has recorded total Measure A expenditures in the amount of $3,156,378 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. ii. We judgmentally selected at least 20% of total Measure A expenditures for testing. Results: The City recorded Measure A expenditures in the amount of $3,156,378. We selected $1,053,476 (33.38%) for testing. 1. For the expenditures selected for testing, we compared the dollar amount recorded in the general ledger to the supporting documentation. Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 2. For the expenditures selected for testing, we reviewed the 5-Year CIP and noted whether the projects claimed were included in the 5-Year CIP and whether they constitute allowable costs. Results: The expenditures selected for testing were included in the 5-year CIP and were allowable costs. No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. iii. We inquired of management as to the nature of any transfers recorded in the Measure A Fund. r Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California Results: Per discussions with management and our review of the costs recorded in the general ledger, there were no transfers recorded for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. iv. We inquired of management as to the amount of indirect costs, if any, included in expenditures. Results: Per discussions with management and our review of the costs recorded in the general ledger, there were no indirect costs recorded for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. 5. We compared the budgeted expenditures to actual amounts and inquired of management as to the nature of significant budget variances. Results: The following schedule compares the budgeted expenditures to actual amounts. Local Measure A Regional Measure A Budget Actual Variance $1,815,000 $2,002,521 $(187,521) 575.000 1,153.857 (578,857) Totals $2,390,000 $3.156,37$ $(766.378) The variance in Regional and Local Measure A expenditures is due to projects budgeted in prior years being completed during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. 6. We obtained a listing of jurisdictions who participate in the Westem County or Coachella Valley TUMF programs from RCTC. a. If the jurisdiction is a participant in the TUMF program, we selected at least two disbursements for validation as to the amount remitted to Coachella Valley Association of Govemments (CVAG), as applicable. Results: The payments selected for testing indicated that TUMF is collected and remitted to CVAG, as required. b. We noted the total amount of TUMF fees collected and remitted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Results: The total amount of TUMF fees collected and remitted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 was $710,909. 7. We obtained the maintenance of effort (MOE) base year requirement from RCTC. a. We obtained a copy of schedule 3 from the annual Street Report. 4 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, Califomia Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. b. We compared the amount of discretionary funds spent per the Street Report to the MOE base requirement. Results: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. c. Using the prior year's report, we added any current year MOE excess or deducted any current year MOE deficiency to the prior year carryover. Results: MOE activity is summarized as follows: MOE excess at July 1, 2008 $28,148,003 Current year local discretionary expenditures 5,281,197 Less MOE base year requirement 1,892,584 Excess MOE for fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 3.388,613 MOE excess at June 30, 2009 $31,536,616 We were not engaged to, and did not, conduct an audit, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion on the accounting records. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Had we performed additional procedures; other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Riverside County Transportation Commission and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party. Irvine, California November 19, 2009 5 EXHIBIT A N r r N r r ■ r r r Revenues: Measure A CVAQ Interest Other CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA Summary of Revenues and Expenses Year Ended June 30, 2009 (Unaudited) Budget Actual Variance $ 1,615,000 $ 1,217,807 $ (397,193) 575,000 1,185,146 610,146 200,000 144,803 (55,197) 7,076 7,076 Total revenues 2,390,000 Expenditures: Local Measure A Regional Measure A Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 2,554,832 1,815,000 2,002,521 575,000 1,153,857 2,390,000 3,156,378 164,832 (187,521) (578,857) (766,378) $ - $ (601,546) $ (601,546) Note: The above numbers were taken directly from the financial records of the City of Palm Springs and were not audited. 6 89185 AZ/GA/SM May 18, 2010. CITY OF PERRIS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 101 North `D' Street, Perris, CA 92570-2200 TEL:951-943-4610 !� L�951�943-50R5 � ��, L U Cq L<INOSIOE.- *COUNTY Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County of Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn: Shirley Medina Re: FY 2010-2015 Measure"A" Improvement Plan Enclosed, please find City of Perris proposed 5-year capital improvement plan. Also enclosed, please find an exhibit depicting the status of the currently adopted 5-year plan and the MOE prepared by the Finance Department and signed by the City Manager. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Habib Motlagh City Engineer Cc: Ron Carr, Assistant City Manager James Fructuoso, Assistant Finance Director MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned hereby agrees and certifies for the City of Perris that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the City of Perris shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the City of Perris for local transportation purposes. The City of Perris hereby acknowledges that the failure of the City of Perris to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated:.S, 19 , 2010 ichard Belmudez, it ATTEST: dy H- ghney, City CITY OF PERRIS MEASURE A - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 ESTIMATED 2009 Base Year - $644,114 FY 2009-2010 G/F Dept Description Estimated Actuals MOE 3033 Street Maintenance $ 667,207 $ 667,207 3031 Engineering 193,988 193,988 3034 Fleet/Equipment 245,476 245,476 Total Street Maintenance 1,106,671 Less Eligible Gas Tax Transfer (840,000) Total General Fund Cost 266,671 Fund No. Description Estimated Actuals 112 Traffic Safety Fund $ 121 Street Lighting - Property Tax 124 Street Lighting Maint Dist 84-1 127 Landscape Maint Dist 1 130 Flood Control Maint Dist 142 Special Revenue Fund 157 City Projects/External Contrib. $ 137,750 639,080 983,467 321,493 1,506,949 425,554 Total Other Sources 4,014,294 GRAND TOTAL 4,280,965 LESS 2009 BASE YEAR DIFFERENCE $ 3,636,851 (644,114) City of Perris Status of Aroved FY 11-15 1 Ethanac Road Phase II On Hold 2 Placentia / I-215 Interchange Extension and Road On Hold Pending MCP 3 Goetz Road Intersection Partially Completed 4 Dirt Road Improvements Waiting for County MOU 5 Slurry Seal Phase 5 Completed 6 Downtown Alleys Plans 90% Complete Agency: Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Perris Habib Motlagh (951) 943-6504 3/19/2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 Item No Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City Wide Slurry (6th Phase) & Pothole Repair Slurry Seal & Overlay, Pothole Repair 1,500 700 2 Downtown Alley 2,200 1400 * * Utilizing Previous Years Allocation Agency: Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Perris Habib Motlagh (951) 943-6504 3/19/2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2012 Item No Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City Wide Slurry (7th Phase) & Potholing Slurry Seal 86 Overlay, Pothole Repair 1,000 600 2 Placentia Avenue 500 420 Agency: Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Perris Habib Motlagh (951) 943-6504 3/19/2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2012 - 2013 Item No Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City Wide Slurry (On -Going) & Potholing Slurry Seal & Overlay, Pothole Repair 750 500 2 Miscellaneous Pavement Repair - City Wide 1,000 250 Agency: Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Perris Habib Motlagh (951) 943-6504 3/19/2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 Item No Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City Wide Slurry (On -Going) / Overlay Slurry Seal & Overlay & Pothole Repair 900 300 2 Ramona Expressway Widening Widening / Pavement Rehabilitation 2,000 500 Agency: Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Perris Habib Motlagh (951) 943-6504 3/19/2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Item No Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 1 City Wide Slurry (On -Going) Slurry Seal & Overlay 1,000 500 2 Perris Blvd. City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation 1,500 350 88707 TT, SM May 11, 2010 Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: FY 2011-2015 Measure "A" Local Street and Roads Capital Improvement Plan Dear Ms. Trevino: Attached are the Local Streets and Roads Program for Measure "A" Funds for FY 2011-2015, the Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement, and the project status report for prior year Plan (FY 2009-2010). The City's maintenance of effort for FY 2010-2011 is $4,929,563, which exceeds our established maintenance of effort requirement of $1,191,036. The City's five-year Capital Improvement Program totals $10,300,000 and identifies Measure "A" local funds totaling $4,812,000. The City currently carries a fund balance of approximately $3,752,220 in the Measure "A" Local Fund account. Therefore, with current and projected future allocations, adequate funds appear to be available for the plan. Attached is the City's Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement along with supporting documentation and the status report for our prior year Plan FYE June 30, 2010. Please feel free to call me at (760) 770-3224 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Bruce B. Harry Jr. Director of Public Works Enclosures: Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement and Supporting Documentation Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans Project Status Report FY 2009-2010 ADMINISTRATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE FFOUSING AUTRORITY PUBLIC LIBRARY PUBLIC WORKS Tel. (760) 324-4511 Tel. (760) 328-2266 Tel. (760) 770-3207 Tel. (760) 770-3210 Tel. (760) 341-7323 Tel. (760) 770-3224 Fax. (760) 324-8830 Fax. (760) 324-9851 Fax. (760) 324-0528 Fax. (760) 341-6793 Fax. (760) 341-5213 Fax. (760) 770-3261 69-825 HIGHWAY 111 / RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 www.ci.Rancho-Mirage.ca.us www.RelaxRand X.29.17 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Rancho Miracle (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Dated: May 7, 2010 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: rf C cam. SECRETARY City of Rancho Mirage Department of Public Works Maintenance of Effort — Measure "A" Fiscal Year 2010-2011 General Fund Expenditures 101 3100 Engineering 7100, 7200 Salaries and Benefits $688,814 (50% of $1,377,628) 7400, 7444 Professional/Technical $2,500 (50% of $5,000) 7460 Inspections $3,750 (50% of $7,500) 7624 Vehicle Operations/Maintenance $2,500 (50% of $5,000) 7800, 7803 Mileage $5,646 (50% of $11,292) 7806 Meetings & Travel $1,500 (50% of $3,000) 7818 Dues & Subscriptions $1,825 (50% of $3,650) 7839 Reproduction & Printing $0 (50% of $0) 8000 Supplies $2,500 (50% of $5,000) 8020 Uniforms $500 (50% of $1,000) Sub Total: $709,535 101 3200 Street Maintenance 7100, 7200 Salaries and Benefits $441,878 7120 Overtime $12,250 7444 Temporary Agency Services $0 7603, 7606 Utilities $17,000 7609-7621 Street Related Maintenance $330,000 7623, 7624, 7634, Vehicle Operations/Maintenance $32,000 7800 7806-7818 Meetings & Travel/Dues & Subscriptions $800 8000-8024 Maintenance Supplies/Small $36,000 Tools/Uniforms/Traffic Control Supplies Sub Total: $869, 928 101, 103, 224, 350, 353, 370 & 372 Capital Protects Other Funding Sources FY 2010/2011 90018 Crack Seal/Rubberized Slurry Seal $100,000 Various Public Streets 90192 Bob Hope Drive Street Improvements $85,000 from Dinah Shore Dr. to Ramon Road Loan Repayment 90382 Bob Hope Drive median Improvements $165,100 90379 Three (3) Major Arterial Intersection Capacity Improvements $3,000,000 Sub Total: $3, 350,100 MOE Grand Total: $4,929,563 Required MOE: $1,191,036 Excess MOE: $3,738,527 FOND 401- GENERAL FIND DIVISION ENO - ENGINEERING ACCT ACCOUNT NO. NAME YUMMY ACTIVITY DETAIL For Fiscal Years 2010.2011 JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 2008-09 STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL FY 2009-10 BUDGET Requested FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 ESTIMATE AMOUNT 7100 Salaries - Full Time Director of Public Works City Engineer Senior Civil Engineer Project Manager Civil Engineering Assistant Public Works Inspector Senior Traffic Signal Technician Engineering Technician II Department Secretary Office Assistant III TOTAL $ 874268 $ $ 155,427 148,026 127,870 90,136 90,875 86,548 86,548 64,124 67,805 55,789 965,245 $ 965,244 $ 973,148 7120 Overtime 1) Department Secretary and Office Assistant III: typing documents, typing specifications, filing and other assorted duties that cannot be accomplished during regular work hours $ 2) Engineering Technician: performing various duties and inspections for permit tracking; plan checking services, maintaining drawing flat -files and high accident location software; 3) Public Works Inspector: performing early inspections in order to maintain quality control offsite%nsite construction. Also ensure projects are properly closed at the end of the day; on -call pay 4) Traffic Signal Maintenance Technician: after hours call outs for traffic signal problems; on -call pay TOTAL $ 21,744 $ I0,000 $ 6,000 $ 2,000 2,000 4,000 7200 Benefits Benefits paid by City including group insurance, retirement and other benefits $ TOTAL $ 387,474 $ 374,862 $ 376,667 $ 404,480 404,480 7400 Professional/ Technical 1) Traffic Engineering consulting services $ 2,500 2) Plan Checking services, special studies, traffic counts, radio maintenance services, and software services 2,500 TOTAL $ 38,617 $ 50,001 $ I0,000 $ 5,000 7444 Temporary Agency Contingency in the event temporary help is required for vacation, illness, jury Services duty, etc. $ TOTAL $ 55 $ 8,200 $ 8,200 $ FIND 101- GEHERAI MID DIVISION 3100 ENDINEDRDN ACCT ACCOUNT NO. NAME EXPENDITORE ACTIVITY DETAIL FO1 FIEC81 Years 2010✓2011 JUSTIFICATION FOR Requested FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT 7460 Inspections Provides special inspections and testing in areas where greater expertise is required and supplementary inspector when City Inspector is absent TOTAL $ $834 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 7464 Survey Control Maintenance of benchmarks for vertical control and centerline monuments for horizontal control TOTAL $ 42,239 $ 5,000 $ $ 5,000 $ 7623 Vehicle Fuel 7624 Vehicle Maintenance Fuel .for vehicles used by Public Works Inspector & Traffic Signal Technician $ 4000 $ TOTAL $ 5,040 $ 6,000 $ Maintenance for the Division's vehicles $ TOTAL $ 3,455 $ 3,000 $ 8,000 $ 6,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 7800 Mileage Reimbursement for use of personal vehicles by Engineering personnel on project administration and inspections $ 1,000 TOTAL $ 994 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 7803 Car Allowance For Director ($428.82hnonth) and City Engineer ($428.82/month) for use of personal vehicles to attend meetings, seminars and conferences $ 10,292 .1 oTAL $ 11,732 $ 11,321 $ 10,806 $ 10,292 7806 Meetings, Training & Travel Attendance at conferences, workshops, tectmical training sessions and continuing education classes in conjunction with job responsibilities or to obtain/maintain certfications, licenses, notary commissions, registrations and the like. 1) American Public Works Association (APWA) International Conference [Director and City Engineer] 2) Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) International Conference 3) League of California Cities Conference [Director] 7806 Meetings, Training 4) Permits Plus Users Conference [Engineering Technician or & Travel Engineering Assistant] (continued) 5) Topical depending on need at time or required as described above TOTAL $ 14452 $ 5,950 $ 4,500 $ 3,000 3,000 FOND 101- GD ERAL FOND DIVISION 3100 - ENGINEERING ACCT ACCOUNT NO. NAME EXPENDITURE AMITY DETAIL FOC HMI YeDCS 2010.2011 JUSTIFICATION FOR Requested FY 2008-09 FY 2.009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT 7818 Dues & Subscriptions Dues for American Public Works Association, National Society of Professional Engineers, American Society of Civil Engineers, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Notary Public, First American Data Tree; technical books, manuals and various subscriptions $ 3,650 TOTAL $ 1,817 $ 2,800 $ 3,000 $ 3,650 7839 Reproduction & Printing Printing specifications, plans, special prints, etc, TOTAL $ 1,828 $ 2,000 $ 1,000 $ 8000 Supplies Office supplies, print paper, delivery services for plan checks, training videos, and film S 5,000 TOTAL $ 5,510 . $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 8012 Small Tools, Fumiture & Equipment Miscellaneous small tools & office equipment as may be necessary TOTAL $ 1,462 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 8020 Uniforms Uniforms for Public Works Inspector, Traffic Signal Technician and safety clothing for Engineering staff TOTAL $ 249 $ 1,500 $ 1,073 $ 1,000 S 1,000 8900 Furniture & Equipment Office engineering equipment as may be necessary TOTAL $ 4187 $ 1,000 $ $ DIVISION TOTAL $ 1,430,070 101- GENERAL ]FOND DIVISION 8200 • SBEET PURMINAKE ACCT ACCOUNT NO. NAME 7100 Salaries - Full Time E IPENDIllRE ACTIVITY DETAIL For Fiscal Years 2011.2011 JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 2008-09 STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL Street Maintenance Supervisor Street Maintenance Worker II Street Maintenance Worker I Street Maintenance Worker I Office Assistant II [half-time] TOTAL FY 2009-10 BUDGET $ 339,427 $ 264,167 Requested FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 ESTIMATE AMOUNT $ 264168 7120 Overtime 1) For emergency callouts for traffic accident clean up, traffic control, cleaning debris and fallen tree limbs, placing barricades and warning signs during rainstorms, and completing projects started during regular work hours 2) On -call Pay TOTAL $ 13,408 $ $ 82,426 64,583 58,579 58,579 21,461 $ 285,628 $ 2,000 10,250 10,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,250 7200 Benefits Benefits paid by City including group insurance, retirement and other benefits $ 156,250 TOTAL $ 164321 $ 128,169 $ 128,018 $ 156,250 7444 Temporary Agency Services Provide temporary clerical services for this division. Amount budgeted provides 8 hours lweek. $ TOTAL $ - $ 14,400 $ 14,400 $ 7603 Electricity Electricity and maintenance for 91 streetlights throughout the City TOTAL $ 13,009 $ 13.000 $ 13,000 7606 Water Water for street sweeping and other miscellaneous uses TOTAL $ 4,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 7609 Street Striping Provides for annual re -striping of the City in SeptembedOctober. Also provides for thermoplastic arrows and legends. TOTAL $ 4306 $ 65,000 $ $ 35,000 65,000 $ 35,000 7612 Maintenance 7615 Street Sweeping Maintenance of storm drains, catch basins, and dry wells Street sweeping contract $ 10,000 TOTAL $ 390804 $ $ $ 10,000 TOTAL $ $ 25,000 18,331 $ 30,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 UPENDITURE ACTIVITY DETAIL For fiscal Years 2010.2011 FIND 101- GENERAL FEND DIVISION 3200 • STREET IKIBI EN►NIE Requested ACCT ACCOUNT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 NO. NAME STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT 7617 Sidewalk/Curb/ Sidewalk, curb and gutter repairs and maintenance. Gutter $ 20,000 Maintenance TOTAL $ 23,019 $ 30,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 7618 Traffic Signal Electricity for 55 traffic signals, re-lamping, emergency callouts, major Maintenance/ knockdowns and replacement of equipment as necessary $ 215,000 Electricity $ 124777 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ TOTAL 215,000 7621 Street Related Asphalt, concrete, aggregate base for repairing streets, disposal of old asphalt Repairs and concrete, equipment rental, catch basin repairs, Iandfdl charges for disposal of roadside refuse, and miscellaneous other street repairs as needed $ 25,000 TOTAL $ 29,255 . $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 25,000 7623 Vehicle Ebel Fuel for the Division's vehicles $ 15,000 TOTAL $ 15,307 $ 18,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 7624 Vehicle Maintenance for the Division's vehicles $ 15,000 Maintenance $ 15166 $ 10,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 TOTAL 7627 Graffiti Removal Purchase of supplies for City Street Maintenance and Code Compliance crews and/or contract personnel for graffiti removal and supplies for distribution to property owners for graffiti removal $ 2,000 TOTAL $ 1,678 $ 1,200 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 7630 Trails Maintenance Provides for contractual services for the maintenance of the trail system $ 14,000 TOTAL $ 12,646 $ 14,000 $ 14,000 $ 14,000 7634 Equipment Maintenance and fuels costs for air compressor, steer skid loader, ford Maintenance & tractor, speed trailers, compactor, cement mixer, arrow board and other Fuel miscellaneous equipment $ 1,000 7800 Mileage TOTAL $ 1,056 $ $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Reimbursement for use of personal vehicle by Office Assistant II for travel between the City Hall Annex and the City Yard $ 1,000 TOTAL $ - $ $ $ 1,000 FUND 101- GENERAL FUND RYISION 3200 - MEET MAINTENANCE ACCT ACCOUNT NO. NAME EYPENDITORE ACIITITY DETAIL For Fiscal Tears 2010-2011 JUSTIFICATION FOR Requested FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT 7806 Meetings, Attendance at technical training sessions to obtain/maintain special licenses Training & or certifications; technical seminars related to asphalt and concrete Travel maintenance; traffic classes for Class A licensed drivers; other topical sessions depending on need at the time, such as water quality testing, new laws or regulations for supervisors, etc. $ TOTAL $ 750 $ 500 $ 500 $ 600 600 7818 Dues & Dues for Maintenance Superintendents Association, American Construction Subscriptions Inspectors Association and technical publications TOTAL $ $ 200 $ $ 200 $ 200 200 8000 Supplies The purchase of silica sand for sandblasting, guardrail material and posts, and concrete patch material $ 3,000 TOTAL $ 4,269 $ 5,060 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 8002 Equipment For rental of equipment as needed Rental TOTAL $ 1,215 $ 2,060 $ $ 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 8003 Street Signs & Purchase of regulatory signs & street marking supplies Markings $ 25,000 TOTAL $ 14201 $ 25,oeo $ 25,000 $ 25,000 8012 Small Tools, Furniture & Equipment Shovels, chain saw chains, drills and bits, jacks, jack stands, landscape tools, signal maintenance tools, mechanic tools, safety equipment, and miscellaneous special tools as required TOTAL $ 196 $ 2,e00 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 2,000 — 8020 Uniforms Purchase uniforms, safety clothing, and shoes for all Street Maintenance personnel $ 2,000 2,000 $ TOTAL $ 951 $ 2,600 $ 2,000 8024 Traffic Control This account provides for the purchase of barricades, both large and small, traffic cones, light board replacement parts, batteries, lights, and rental of traffic control setups $ 2,000 TOTAL $ $239 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 8905 Automotive Replace 2003 Ford F-350 with new 4 x 4 F-350 service truck $ TOTAL $ $ - $ $ DIVISION TOTAL $ 885,928 EXPENDITURE ACTIVITY DETAIL For Mal Years 2010.2011 FOND 103 - GENERAL FOND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS MAN® FROM Host TAR Requested ACCT ACCOUNT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 20I0-I1 NO. NAME STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT 90018 Type I Rubber Refer to the Capital Improvements section of this document for a project emulsion aggregate description. slurry (REAS) 100,000 TOTAL $ - $ $ 100,000 90364 Section 19 Refer to the Capital Improvements section of this document for a project Infrastructure description. $ 200,000 Study TOTAL $ - $ $ 200,000 90282 City Wide Traffic Refer to the Capital Improvements section of this document for a project Signal Painting description. $ TOTAL $ - $ $ 90202 City Ball Refer to the Capital Improvements section of this document for a project Recarpeting description. $ TOTAL $ - $ $ 90370 City Yard Refer to the Capital Improvements section of this document for a project Equipment & description. $ Vehicle Shade Structure TOTAL $ - $ $ 90371 City Annex Refer to the Capital improvements section of this document for a project Parking Shade description. $ Structure TOTAL $ - $ $ 90375 City Hall Parking Refer to the Capital Improvements section of this document for a project Lot Asphalt description. $ Replacement TOTAL $ $ $ 90380 Country Club Refer to the Capital Improvements section of this document for a project Drive rubber description, $ emulsion aggregate slurry TOTAL $ $ $ DTPiSTON TOTAL $ 300,000 E%P ESTERE ACTIVITY DETAIL For Fiscal Years 201041 Fa 350 - DEVEOP MENT WPM FFE-116TIDNL INIERCENSF$, AND INFERSFCCTIONS ACCT ACCOUNT NO. NAME JUSTIFICATION FOR STAFF REQUESTS Requested FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT 90192 Bob Hope/Dinah Refer to the Capital Improvements section of this document for a project Shore Street description. Improvements $ 85,000 TOTAL $ 75,000 $ 84,224 $ 85,000 FUND TOTAL $ 85,000 IMMIXTURE ACTIVITY DETAIL FM' FiSCilI Years 2D10.11 FOND 353 - DEYELOPMENr IMPACT FEE - MEDDIN BLINDS ACCT ACCOUNT NO. NAME JUSTIFICATION FOR STAFF REQUESTS Requested FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT 90382 Bob Hope Drive Refer to the Capital Improvements section of this document for a project Median description. Improvements TOTAL $ 165,100 - $ $ 165,100 FUND TOTAL $ 165,100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 Agency: City of Rancho Mirage Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Bruce Harry, Director of Public Works Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 4, 2010 ITEM NO PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL PROJECT COST ($0001S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1. Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, A.C. overlays and striping on various public streets. Preventative Maintenance 424 200 2• Mirage Cove Drive, Stellar Drive, Nebulae Way, Venus Drive and Saturn Circle Pavement Reconstruction. Pavement Reconstruction 800 200 3. Highway 111 and Frank Sinatra Drive Intersection Improvements. Capacity Enhancement 1.200 200 3. Bob Hope Dr./I-10 Interchange Project (Est. City Contribution) Extension of Bob Hope Drive to the new I-10 Interchange 551 150 4. Date Palm Dr./I-10 Interchange Project (Est. City Contribution) Existing Interchange Capacity Enhancement Improvement 1,200 1,200 TOTALS 4,175 1,950 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2012 Agency: City of Rancho Mirage Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Bruce Harry, Director of Public Works Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 4, 2010 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL PROJECT COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1'1'EM NO. 1, Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, A.C. overlays and striping on various public streets. Preventative Pavement Maintenance 800 400 TOTALS 800 400 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2012 - 2013 Agency: City of Rancho Mirage Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Bruce Harry, Director of Public Works Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 4, 2010 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL PROJECT COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1. Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, A.C. overlays and striping on various public streets. Preventative Maintenance 600 300 3. Frank Sinatra Drive Pavement Rehabilitation from Bob Hope Drive to east city limits. Pavement Rehabilitation 850 300 4. Highway 111 Pavement Rehabilitation from Bob Hope Drive to east city limit. Pavement Rehabilitation 750 100 TOTALS 2,200 700 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 Agency: City of Rancho Mirage Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Bruce Harry, Director of Public Works Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 4, 2010 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL PROJECT COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1. Citywide slung seal, crack seal, A.C. overlays and striping on various public streets. Preventative Maintenance 400 400 2. Momingside Drive pavement rehabilitation from Country Club Drive to Frank Sinatra Drive. Pavement Rehabilitation 850 425 TOTALS 1,250 825 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Agency: City of Rancho Mirage Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Bruce Harry, Director of Public Works Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 4, 2010 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL PROJECT COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1. Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, A.C. overlays and striping on various public streets. Preventative Maintenance 400 200 2. Rancho Las Palmas Drive Pavement Rehabilitation from Highway 111 to Bob Hope Drive. Pavement Rehabilitation 775 387 3. Country Club Drive Pavement Reconstruction from Hwy 111 to Morningside Drive. Pavement Reconstruction 700 350 TOTAL 1,875 937 May 7, 2010 CITY OF R NC O MIRAGE 21 Ms. Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex, Third Floor Post Office Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: FY 2009/2010 Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Status Report Dear Ms Trevino: The following is the current status of City of Rancho Mirage projects identified in our FY 2009/2010 Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Program as requested. 1. Project: Citywide slurry, crack sealing, A.C. overlays on various streets Status: Project will be completed by May 28, 2010. 2. Project: Bob Hope Dr. widening from Dinah Shore to Ramon Status: Construction scheduled for May 2010 — October 2010 3. Project: Monterey street improvements from Country Club to Gerald Ford Status: Construction started July 2009 and completed on April 5, 2010 4. Project: Bob Hope/I-10 Interchange Project (Caltrans Administered) Status: Under Construction, Completion by August 2011. ADMINISTRATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE HOUSING AUTHORITY PUBLIC LIBRARY PUBLIC WORKS Tei. (760) 324-4511 Tel. (760) 328-2266 Tel. (760) 770-3207 Tel. (760) 770-3210 Tel. (760) 341-7323 Tel. (760) 770-3224 Fax. (760) 324-8830 Fax. (760) 324-9851 Fax. (760) 324-0528 Fax. (760) 341-6793 Fax. (760) 341-5213 Fax. (760) 770-3261 69-825 HIGHWAY 111 / RANCI-HO MIRAGE, CA 92270 www.ci.Rancho-Mirage.ca.us www.RelaxRanchoMirage.com 5. Project: Date Palm/I-10 Interchange (Cathedral City Administered) Status: Construction started February 2010 and scheduled to be completed by August 2011 Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (760) 770-3224. Sincerely, Bruce B. Harry, Jr. Director of Public Works c: RCTC Measure "A", FY 2011-2015 File 89042 TT, SM Public Works Department May 3, 2010 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn.: Ms. Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Manager Subject: Maintenance of Effort Certification and Measure A CIP Enclosed is the City of Riverside's Maintenance of Effort Certification for FY 2009/10 accompanied by supporting documentation. The City's estimated eligible expenditures for FY 2009/10 total $15,610,596 as compared to our baseline amount of $12,449,203. The City of Riverside's Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Program for FY 2010/11 through FY 2014/15 and a status report for FY 2009/10 are also enclosed. If you have any questions, please contact Patrick Keeney at (951) 826-2406. Sincerely, Thomas J. Boyd Deputy Public Works Director — City Engineer Attachments G:1Common1Measure of Effort\09 10 FY\RCTC 0910 MOE Letter 050310.doc 3900 Main Street • Riverside, CA 92522 • 951.826.5341 • fax 951.826.5542 • www.riversideca.gov X.29.18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Riverside (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort base year amounts approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2009 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. April 30, 2010 Dated: AAav 7, -241-8- Siobhan oster Public Works Director Paul Sundeen Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer Approved as to Form: CitAttor ey Bradley J. Hudson City Manager • FY2009/10 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures City of Riverside (Round to nearest dollar) Funding Breakdown Project Expenditures Included in General Ledger Total Cost General Fund Meas A Federal State City Funds Other Construction: Maintenance: Section 112380 - CM - Street Lights $ 4,378,015 $ 4,378,015 Section 410000 - PW - Administration $ (203,287) $ (203,287) Section 410010 - PW - Animal Regulation $ 2,694,822 $ 2,694,822 Section 410020 - PW - Sundry $ 55,781 $ 55,781 Section 411000 - PW - Streets Administration $ 614,155 $ 614,155 Section 411010- PW -Streets Maintenance $ 2,999,717 $ 2,999,717 Section 411011- PW - Forestry & Landscape $ 2,852,395 $ 2,852,395 Section 411012 - PW - Landscape Maintenance Districts $ 526,300 $ 526,300 Section 411030 - PW - Storm Drain Maintenance $ 108,789 $ 108,789 Section 411500 - PW - City Engineering $ 4,009,969 $ 4,009,969 Section 412000 - PW - Traffic Engineering $ 1,591,334 $ 1,591,334 Section 412010 - PW - Traffic -Photo Red Light $ 2,558,213 $ 2,558,213 Section 412020 - PW - Crossing Guards $ 720,163 $ 720,163 Section 412100 - PW - Traffic -Photo Red Light $ 30 $ 30 Section 412515 - PW - Storm Drain Maintenance $ 171,024 $ 171,024 Section 413530 - PW - Street Projects $ $ - Section 419000 - PW - Debt $ 317,737 $ 317,737 Section 419500 - PW - Capital $ 336,924 $ 336,924 Engineering/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to Specific Projects: $ $ $ - Deductions for Special Consideration (Deductions Must Also Be Included in Project Expenditures Above): Total Project Cost General Fund State Reason Why Project Expenditure Should Be Deducted from MOE Construction: Maintenance: Section 410000 - PW - Administration $ (203,287) $ (203,287) Deduct unallocated adminstration and engineering per TAC Subcommittee MOE meeting 3/2/10 Section 410010 - PW - Animal Regulation $ 2,694,822 $ 2,694,822 Non -transportation related Section 410020 - PW - Sundry $ 55,781 $ 55,781 Non -transportation related Section 411012 - PW - Landscape Maintenance Districts $ 526,300 $ 526,300 Non -transportation related Section 411500 - PW - City Engineering $ 4,009,969 $ 4,009,969 Deduct unallocated adminstration and engineering per TAC Subcommittee MOE meeting 3/2/10 Section 412020 - PW - Crossing Guards $ 720,163 $ 720,163 Non -transportation related Section 419000 - PW - Debt $ 317,737 $ 317,737 Non -transportation related Engineering/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to Specific Projects: $ $ $ $ 1989 MOE Base Year $ 12,449,203 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 15, 2010 Page 1 of 7 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1 Indiana Widening @ Pierce Street Widening and Improvements 1,540 *493 2 Jurupa Ave. - Van Buren Blvd. to Rutland Design and Environmental Documents for New Street Construction 250 *158 3 Lime & University Intersection Improvements 156 *156 4 Major Street Rehabilitation 08/09 - Orange Terrace Street Resurfacing 1,811 *1,116 5 Major Street Rehabilitation 09/10 Street Resurfacing 956 *956 6 Major Street Rehabilitation 10/11 Street Resurfacing 1,400 750 7 Minor Street Rehabilitation 08/09 Street Overlay 4,156 *1,730 8 Misc. Railroad Project Management Grade Separation 360 *44 9 Myrtle @ Victoria Intersection Intersection Improvements 150 150 10 Quiet Zone - BNSF & UP Railroads Railroad Quiet Zone 17,000 *113 11 Railroad Grade Separation - Iowa Grade Separation 32,056 *496 12 Railroad Grade Separation - Madison Grade Separation/Preliminary Design 250 *50 13 Railroad Grade Separation - Magnolia Grade Separation 57,190 *96 14 Railroad Grade Separation - Mary Grade Separation 38,100 *178 15 Railroad Grade Separation - Riverside Grade Separation 31,860 *599 16 Railroad Grade Separation - Streeter Grade Separation 37,425 *1,782 * Indicates Measure A funding in prior fiscal years and not expended at 7/1/09. gkommon\measure of effort\FY 0910\measacip 1011 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 15, 2010 Page 2 of 7 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 17 Railroad Grade Separation - Third St. Grade Separation - Design 961 - 18 Railroad Grade Separations Grade Separation 591 *591 19 Sidewalk/Trail Construction 09/10 Citywide Sidewalk Construction 500 *100 20 Tyler Widening - Wells to Hole Street Widening and Improvements 8,000 *3,000 21 Van Buren - Garfield to Jackson Street Widening 14,840 *125 22 Van Buren - Indiana to South City Limit Street Widening 26,750 *500 23 Van Buren - Jurupa to Santa Ana River Street Widening 300 300 24 Van Buren - Santa Ana River to Jackson Street Widening 18,400 *137 25 Van Buren Blvd / 91 Frwy Interchange Interchange Improvements 34,500 *60 26 Washington Turn Lanes Addition of Turn Lanes 1,000 *996 27 Wilderness Ave @ UPRR Crossing Street Improvements @ RR Crossing 358 *358 28 Arlington Avenue @ Horace Street Traffic Signal Revision 80 *80 29 Arterial Interconnections 09/10 Traffic Signal Coordination 300 *200 30 CalTrans Ramps Coordination Traffic Signal Coordination 53 *53 31 De Anza @ Central Avenue Traffic Signal Revision 70 *70 32 Dufferin Ave @ Stewart Street Street Closure 205 *194 33 La Cadena @ Spruce Street Traffic Signal Revision 70 *70 Indicates Measure A funding in prior fiscal years and not expended at 7/1l09. Ocommon\measure of effort\FY 0910\measacip 1011 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 15, 2010 Page 3 of 7 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 34 Main - First to Columbia Traffic Signal Coordination 250 *250 35 Multi -Agency Traffic Coordination Traffic Signal Coordination 825 *367 36 Traffic Management Center Traffic Management Center - 50 50 Equipment and Improvements 37 Traffic Signal Battery Back Up Battery Back Up System for Traffic 1,214 *609 38 Traffic Signal Revisions 09/10 Traffic Signal Revision 250 *250 39 Traffic Signal Revisions 10/11 Traffic Signal Revision 100 100 40 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations 09/10 New Traffic Signal Installation 250 *250 41 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 42 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 75 75 43 Transportation Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 44 Controller Assembly Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 40 40 45 Spread Spectrum Radio Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 10 10 46 Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 35 35 Subtotal Project Costs 335,087 Subtotal FY 2011 Meas. A Funding 1,860 Subtotal Prior Meas. A Funding 15,111 * Indicates Measure A funding in prior fiscal years and not expended at 7/1/09. g:\common\measure of effort\FY 0910\measacip 1011 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011- 2012 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 15, 2010 Page 4 of 7 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1 Main Street Reconstruction - SR 60 to 1st Street Reconstruction and Improvements 2,500 1,500 2 Van Buren - Garfield to Jackson Street Widening 14,840 400 3 Major Street Rehabilitation 11/12 Street Resurfacing 1,400 1,400 4 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 535 535 5 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 300 300 6 Railroad Grade Separations Grade Separation 447 447 7 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 8 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 75 75 9 Transportation Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 Subtotal Project Costs 20,447 Subtotal FY2012 Meas. A Funding 5,007 g:\common\measure of effort\FY 0910\measacip 1011 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012- 2013 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: Apri115, 2010 Page 5 of 7 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1 Jurupa Extension - Rutland to Crest New Street Construction 300 300 2 Major Street Rehabilitation 12/13 Street Resurfacing 1,400 1,400 3 Van Buren - Garfield to Jackson Street Widening 14,840 1,000 4 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 535 535 5 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 300 300 6 Railroad Grade Separations Grade Separation 461 461 7 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 8 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 75 75 9 Transportation Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 Subtotal Project Costs 18,261 Subtotal FY2013 Meas. A Funding 4,421 gkommonlmeasure of effortlFY 09101measacip 1011 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 15, 2010 Page 6 of 7 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1 Major Street Rehabilitation 13/14 Street Resurfacing 1,400 1,400 2 Van Buren - Garfield to Jackson Street Widening 14,840 1,000 3 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 535 535 4 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 300 300 5 Railroad Grade Separations Grade Separation 479 479 6 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 7 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 75 75 8 Transportation Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 Subtotal Project Costs 17,979 Subtotal FY2014 Meas. A Funding 4,139 g:lcommonlmeasure of effortlFY 09101measacip 1011 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014- 2015 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 15, 2010 Page 7 of 7 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MOOS) MEASURE FUNDS ($000'S) 1 Van Buren - Garfield to Jackson Street Widening 14,840 1,400 2 Major Street Rehabilitation 14/15 Street Resurfacing 1,400 1,400 3 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 535 535 4 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 300 300 5 Railroad Grade Separations Grade Separation 503 503 6 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 7 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 75 75 8 Transportation Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 Subtotal Project Costs 18,003 Subtotal FY2015 Meas. A Funding 4,563 Total FY2011-2015 Meas. A Funding 19,990 g:lcommon\measure of effort\FY 09101measacip 1011 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY2009-10 Agency: City of Riverside Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: April 15, 2010 Item No. PROJECT NAMEQdMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 1 Arlington Widening - Victoria to Alessandro Street Widening and Improvements 16,500 - Project on hold pending assessment of revenues/Measure A call for projects. 2 Canyon Crest Widening - Country Club to Via Vista Street Widening and Improvements 6,000 - Project on hold pending assessment of revenues. 3 Central Avenue Improvements - Victoria to Asphalt Rehabilitation and Median 4,661 *253 Project is complete. Chicago Rehabilitation/Enhancement 4 Indiana Widening @ Pierce Street Widening and Improvements 1,540 *493 Project to be completed with construction of new school, anticipated in 2010. 5 Jurupa Extension - Van Buren to Rutland Design and Environmental Documents for New Street Construction 250 *158 Contract awarded for design/environmental documentation in February 2009. 6 Jurupa Avenue Underpass Street Underpass/Grade Separation 25,414 *844 Project is complete. 7 La Sierra/91 Fwy. Reconstruction Interchange Improvements 40,000 - Project is complete. 8 Lime and University Intersection improvements 156 *156 On hold pending construction of new office building. 9 Major Street Rehabilitation 07/08 (Mission Inn, University and Lime) Street Resurfacing and Signal Modifications 3,010 *649 Project is complete. 10 Major Street Rehabilitation 08/09 - Hole Street Resurfacing 1,132 *533 Project is complete. Avenue 11 Major Street Rehabilitation 08/09 - Orange Street Resurfacing 1,811 *1,116 Project is complete. Terrace Parkway *Prior years unexpended funds at July 1, 2009. GACommonlMeasure of Effort109 10 FY\measastatus2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY2009-10 Agency: City of Riverside Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: Apri115, 2010 Item No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 12 Major Street Rehabilitation 09/10 Street Resurfacing 956 956 Design in progress. 13 Martin Luther King - SR 91 to Chicago (study) Traffic Study 50 *13 Study is complete. 14 Minor Street Rehabilitation 08/09 Street Overlay 4,156 *1,730 Contract awarded in May 2009. 15 Miscelllaneous Railroad Project Management Grade Separations 360 *44 Ongoing project management. 16 Quiet Zone Quiet Zone for BNSF 8 UP Railroads 17,000 *113 Design in progress. 17 RR Grade Separation - Columbia Avenue Grade Separation - Columbia @ BNSF 29,150 - Project is complete. 18 RR Grade Separation - Iowa Avenue Grade Separation - Iowa @ BNSF 32,056 *496 Design and right-of-way acquisition in progress. 19 RR Grade Separation - Madison Street Grade Separations - preliminary design 250 *50 Preliminary design in progress. 20 RR Grade Separation - Magnolia Avenue Grade Separation - Magnolia @ UPRR 57,190 *96 Contract awarded in December 2009. 21 RR Grade Separation - Mary Street Grade Separation - Mary @ BNSF 38,100 *178 Design in progress. 22 RR Grade Separation - Riverside Avenue Grade Separation - Riverside a UPRR 31,860 *599 Design in progress. 23 RR Grade Separation - Streeter Avenue Grade Separation - Streeter @ UPRR 37,425 *1,782 Design in progress. 24 RR Grade Separation - Third Street Grade Separation - preliminary and final design 961 - Design in progress. * Prior years unexpended funds at July 1, 2009. G:1CommonlMeasure of Effort109 10 FYlmeasastatus2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY2009-10 Agency: City of Riverside Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: April l5, 2010 Item No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 25 Railroad Grade Separations Grade Separations 591 528 For debt service or allocation to specific *63 projects. 26 Sidewalk Repair 07/08 Sidewalk Repair - Citywide 484 *80 Project is complete. 27 Sidewalk/Trail Construction 09/10 Sidewalk Construction 500 100 Design in progress. 28 Tyler Widening - Wells to Hole Street Widening and Improvements 8,000 *3,000 Design in progress. 29 Van Buren Blvd. Widening - Garfield to Street Widening 14,840 25 On hold pending assessment of revenues/ Jackson St *100 call for projects. 30 Van Buren Blvd. Widening - Indiana to South Street Widening 26,750 *500 Design is planned for 2009/10. City Limit 31 Van Buren Blvd. Widening - Santa Ana River to Jackson Street Street Widening 18,400 *137 Contract awarded in May 2009. Estimated completion in September 2010. 32 Van Buren Blvd / 91 Frwy Interchange Interchange Improvements 34,500 *60 Contract awarded in January 2010. Estimated completion in June 2011. 33 Washington Tum Lanes Addition ofTum Lanes 1,000 *996 Design in progress. 34 Wilderness Ave @ UPRR Crossing Street Improvements @ RR Crossing 358 *358 Design in progress. 35 Arlington @ Horace Signal Modification 80 *80 Design in progress. 36 Arterial Interconnections Signal Coordinations 300 200 Project is underway. 37 CalTrans Ramps Coordination Signal Coordinations 53 *53 On -going signal coordination work. * Prior years unexpended funds at July 1, 2009. a\Common\Measure of Effort109 10 FY1measastatus2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY2009-I0 Agency: City of Riverside Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: April15, 2010 Item No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 38 De Anza @ Central Signal Modification 70 *70 Design in progress. 39 Dufferin Ave @ Stewart Street Street Closure 205 *194 Project is underway. 40 La Cadena a Columbia Signal Modification 130 *79 Project is complete. 41 La Cadena 0, Spruce Signal Modification 70 *70 Design in progress. 42 Main Street Interconnect -1st to Columbia Signal Coordination 250 *250 Contract awarded in December 2009. 43 Miscellaneous Signal Revisions 07/08 Signal Modifications 150 *25 Project is complete. 44 Miscellaneous Signal Revisions 09/10 Signal Modification 250 250 Design in progress. 45 Multi -Agency Traffic Coordination Signal Coordination 825 *367 Design in progress. 46 New Traffic Signals 09/10 Signal Installation 250 250 Design in progress. 47 Sycamore Canyon - Box Springs Signal Installation 294 *11 Project is complete. 48 Sycamore Canyon - Eastridge Signal Installation 349 *9 Project is complete. 49 Sycamore Canyon - Sierra Ridge Signal Installation 145 *2 Project is complete. 50 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 125 125 Ongoing annual expenditure. 51 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 75 75 Ongoing annual expenditure. 52 Controller Assembly Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 40 40 Ongoing annual expenditure. *Prior years unexpended funds at July 1, 2009. GACommon\Measure of Effort\09 10 F1lmeasastatus2010 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM STATUS FY2009-10 Agency: City of Riverside Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: Apri115, 2010 Item No. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) STATUS 53 Transportation Planning/Inyestigation Traffic Engineering 165 165 Ongoing annual expenditure. 54 Spread Spectrum Radio Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 20 20 Ongoing annual expenditure. 55 Traffic Signal Battery Back Up Battery Back Up System for Traffic 1,214 100 Phase III is complete. *509 56 Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 60 60 Ongoing annual expenditure. nor years unexpended funds at July 1, 2009. a\Common\Measure of Effort\09 10 PArneasastatus2010 Orig. to SM 89095 TT, SM May 6, 2010 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Transportation Department Ms. Shirley Medina Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 S. Lemon St., Third floor Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Dear Ms. Medina: Juan C. Perez, P.E., T.E Director of Transportation Attached is the County's five-year program of projects for the County's portion of Measure A funds for Fiscal Year 2011/2015. The County's Transportation Department receives no general funds and no certification of MOE is included. Also attached is a copy of our Fiscal Year 2010/2014 plan with comments addressing project status, project additions and delays. 1Ne have scheduled expenditures based on revenue projections transmitted by your letter of February 8, 2010. These projects are incorporated in the County's proposed Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) which is planned for Board approval. We will inform your agency of any changes that occur to the Measure A program due to future revisions of the County's TIP. If you have any questions concerning this program, please contact me or Patricia Romo, Deputy Director of Transportation, at (951) 955-6740. incerely, Juan C. Perez 2 Z I u Lb L' MAY i Director of Transportation 772.1,NSPCI rT'QN ^ M r SWIN RKN: attachments cc: Ed Cooper Glenn Higa/Roy Null (transmittal only) 4080 Lemon Street, 8t Floor • Riverside, California 92501 • (951) 955-6740 P.O. Box 1090 • Riverside, California 92502-1090 • FAX (951) 955-3198 X.29.19 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Pagel 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 112/13 13/14 14/15 04th St 4 301 127 D 9 0 0 0 0 SR 111 Hammond Rd E 5 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const raised median at RR crossing other 214 C 113 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 341 21st Ave 5 301 12 D 1 0 0 0 0 W Circle B Dr 0.02 mi E Circle B Dr 0.02 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .04 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 10 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 12 46th St 2 300 105 D 0 0 0 0 0 Riverview Dr SE'ly 800' E 0 0 0 0 0 .15 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Reconst and Widen AC Paved Road other C 105 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 105 Acacia Ave 3 300 380 D 0 0 0 0 0 Columbia St Meridian St E 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 380 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 380 Acorn Ln 3 300 93 D 0 1 0 0 0 Sylvan Wy %P ly 0.31 mi E 0 1 0 0 0 .31 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 91 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 93 Alessandro Ave 3 300 470 D 0 0 0 0 0 S'ly Cypress 0.02 mi Ramona Expy E 0 0 0 0 0 .79 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf other C 470 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 470 Alicante Dr 5 300 61 D 0 0 0 0 0 Capitola Ln Sultanas Rd E 1 0 0 0 0 .17 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 60 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 61 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 2 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 112/13 113/14 14/15 Alicante Dr 5 300 143 D 0 0 0 0 0 Briggs Rd Capitola Ln E 1 0 0 0 0 .32 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 142 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 143 Apache Tr/ I-10 Interchange 5 300 10 D 0 0 0 0 0 Seminole Dr Main St E 0 0 0 0 0 .20 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) R 5 0 0 0 0 Const Roundabouts at 2 off/on ramp intersections to improve capacity of interchange. other C 5 0 0 0 0 Funds shown are for County activity only. 300 Measure A/Western Total 10 Ave Juan Bautista 2 300 96 D 9 0 0 0 0 Limonite Ave S'ly Ave Don Benito E 1 0 0 0 0 .50 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 86 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 96 Avenida Madrid 5 300 83 D 0 0 0 0 0 Alicante Dr San Juan Dr E 1 0 0 0 0 .21 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 82 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 83 Avenida Ramada 5 300 50 D 0 0 0 0 0 Alicante Dr Sly Alicante Dr .12mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .12 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 49 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 50 Avenida Rancho Vista 3 300 37 D 0 0 0 0 0 Linda Rosea Rd Via Cerro Vista E 1 0 0 0 0 .14 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 36 0 0 0, 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 37 Avenida Valencia 5 300 118 D 0 0 0 0 0 La Puerta Dr Mapes Rd E 1 0 0 0 0 .29 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 117 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 118 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 3 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 114/15 Avenida Vizcaya 5 300 83 D 0 0 0 0 0 Alicante Dr San Juan Dr E 1 0 0 0 0 .21 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 82 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 83 Bautista Rd 3 300 599 D 0 0 0 0 0 S.H. 371 Upper Valley Rd E 0 1 0 0 0 2.11 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 0 598 0 0 0 _ 300 Measure A/Western Total 599 Bedford Canyon Rd 2 300 567 D 0 0 0 0 0 El Cerrito Rd S'ly E 0 0 0 0 0 .10 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 40 (ft) R 351 0 0 0 0 Realign road and install traffic signal other C 216 0 0 0 0 Part of Corona's Foothill Pkwy/El Cerrito Rd project. 300 Measure A/Western Total 567 Bennett Rd 4 301 187 D 1 0 0 0 0 Dillon Rd S'ly 1.12 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 1.12 (mi) 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 185 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 187 Cactus Ave Interchange 1 300 41 D 7 7 7 0 0 I-215 E 0 0 0 0 0 .55 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 76 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Recon and widen overpass and ramps other 50700 C 0 0 0 10 10 70% in SD#1, 30% in SD#5 Moreno Valley is the lead agency 300 Measure A/Western Total 50741 Calico Ave 5 300 110 D 0 0 0 0 0 Chaparral Rd Cottonwood Rd E 0 0 0 0 0 .21 (mi) 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 110 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total. 110 Camino Real 2 300 106 D 63 15 0 0 0 Jurupa Rd S'ly 0.23 mi. E 18 0 0 0 0 .23 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 80 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Widen to 4 lanes and modify signal at Jurupa other 1759 C 0 10 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 1865 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 4 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 113/14 14/15 Chaparral Rd 5 300 192 D 0 0 0 0 0 Tamarack Rd Haugen Lehmann Wy E 0 0 0 0 0 .37 (mi) 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 192 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 192 Cherry Valley Blvd 5 300 114 D 0 0 0 0 0 Beaumont Ave Noble St E 1 0 0 0 0 .51 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 113 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 114 Chico Cir 5 301 18 D 1 0 0 0 0 Circle B Dr NW'ly E 1 0 0 0 0 .03 (mil 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 16 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 18 Chuckwalla Vly Rd 4 302 423 D 0 0 0 0 0 Wly Graham Pass 1.82mi I-10 (E) E 1 0 0 0 0 5.04 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other 2 C 422 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde Total 425 Circle B Dr 5 301 234 D 1 0 0 0 0 20th Ave 21st Ave E 1 0 0 0 0 .58 (mil 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 232 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 234 Clemente Ave 5 300 56 D 0 0 0 0 0 Alicante Dr Sly Alicante Dr .12mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .12 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 55 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 56 Coachella Valley Area 4 301 1015 D 0 0 0 0 0 various roads E 0 0 0 0 0 6.00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf other C 0 275 300 220 220 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 1015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 5 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 113/14 14/15 Contreras Rd 3 Johnson Rd S.H. 371 .49 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 300 other 327 D E R C 0 0 0 0 300 Measure 0 1 0 326 A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 327 Corvado Dr 5 Circle B Dr Ely .03 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 301 other 13 D E R C 0 1 0 12 301 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 13 Cottonwood Rd 5 Tamarack Rd Verbenia Ave .45 (mi) 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 233 D E R C 0 0 0 233 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 233 Countywide Solar Radar Speed Feedback Signs 1 various locations .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Install Solar Powered Radar Speed Feedback Signs 300 other 202 D E R C 300 5 0 0 96 Measure 5 0 0 96 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 202 Da Vall Dr Interchange on I-10 4 30th Ave Varner Rd 1.02 (mi) (ft)/110 (ft) Const new interchange, connecting roads and bridges over UPRR and Long Cyn Creek channel. Cathedral City is lead agency. 301 other 40 1600 D E R C 301 10 0 0 0 Measure 10 0 0 0 A/Coachella 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 1640 De Frain Blvd 4 I-10 06th Ave 3.75 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC road in select areas & Const turn lanes at Hobson Way. Partly in the City of Blythe. Additional funds are needed. 302 other 88 810 D E R C 302 39 2 0 3 Measure 0 0 0 44 A/Palo 0 0 0 0 Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 898 Dillon Rd 4 Nly Landfill Rd 0.28mi Coachella C.L. .87 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 301 other 387 D E R C 301 0 1 0 386 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 387 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 6 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 113/14 14/15 El Para's° Dr 5 La Puerta Dr S La Puerta Dr .02mi .02 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 9 D E R C 0 1 0 8 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 9 El Sobrante Rd 1 Cajalco Rd Mc Allister Rd 5.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon AC paved road 300 other 3240 D E R C 0 0 0 0 300 Measure 225 5 0 5 A/Western 0 0 0 1805 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 Total 3240 El Sobrante Rd 1 Mc Allister St E'ly 1.00 mi 1.00 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Widen shoulders and add roadway illumination 300 other 76 423 D E R C 300 0 0 0 76 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 499 El Sobrante Rd 1 Mockingbird Canyon Rd Cajalco Rd 1.00 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Widen shoulders and add roadway illumination 300 other 61 319 D E R C 300 0 0 0 61 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 380 Eucalyptus St 5 Esperanza Ave Ida Ave .17 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Grind and Resurf 300 other 30 D E R C 300 0 0 0 30 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 30 Fremontia Rd 5 Tamarack Rd Cottonwood Rd .37 (mi) 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 192 D E R C 300 0 0 0 192 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 192 Frontage Rd 3 Rainbow Canyon Rd / N San Diego C.L. .67 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 300 other 113 D E R C 300 0 1 0 112 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 113 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 7 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft). Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 113/14 114/15 Hamner 8 Summer Bike Lanes 2 300 30 D 0 0 0 0 0 Schleisman/Limonite Av Citrus/Bellegrave Av E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const Bike Lanes other 265 C 30 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 295 Hattie Ave 5 300 23 D 0 0 0 0 0 Elm St E'ly end E 0 0 0 0 0 .14 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf other C 23 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 23 Haugen-Lehmann Wy 5 300 265 D 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Ave Chaparral Rd E 0 0 0 0 0 .51 (mi) 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 265 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 265 Haugen-Lehmann Wy 5 300 160 D 0 0 0 0 0 Chaparral Rd Wily Chaparral 0.31 mi E 0 0 0 0 0 .31 (mi) 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 160 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 160 Helen Ave 5 300 12 D 0 0 0 0 0 Elm St E'ly end E 0 0 0 0 0 .07 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf other C 12 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 12 Johnson Rd 3 300 259 D 0 0 0 0 0 Contreras Rd Hill St E 0 1 0 0 0 .51 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 0 258 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 259 Johnson St 4 301 325 D 1 0 0 0 0 84th Ave 82nd Ave E 1 0 0 0 0 .99 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 323 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella valley Total 325 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 8 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 113/14 14/15 Jonathan Ave 5 Brookside Ave Dutton St .88 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 300 other 100 D E R C 0 1 0 99 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 100 Kirby Rd 3 Wellman Rd Mitchell Rd 1.98 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 300 other 512 660 D E R C 1 1 0 510 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1172 Krameria Ave 1 Lois Ln Woodcrest Elem. School .13 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Const curb, gutter and sidewalk on south side and install matchup sidewalk on north side. 300 other 241 88 D E R C 0 0 0 241 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 329 Krameria Ave 1 Gardner Ave Gamble Ave .50 (mi) 14 (ft)/ 20 (ft) Const curb, gutter, and sidewalk on north side 300 other 10 648 D E R C 300 10 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 658 La Paloma Dr 5 La Puerta Dr S La Puerta Dr .02mi .02 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 10 D E R C 300 0 1 0 9 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 10 La Puerta Dr 5 El Paraiso Dr La Paloma Dr .16 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 65 D E R C 300 0 1 0 64 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 65 Lake Terrace Dr 1 Tempe St Riverside Dr .09 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 37 D E R C 300 1 1 0 35 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 37 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 9 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 Lasso Ct 2 300 14 D 5 0 0 0 0 Corral St Slly Corral 0.05 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .05 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf with AHRM other C 8 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 14 Leon Rd 3 300 847 D 50 0 0 0 0 Keller Rd Scott Rd E 19 0 0 0 0 1.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 10 0 0 0 0 Adjust AC road profile other 1360 C 20 748 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 2207 Limonite Ave 2 300 50 D 0 0 25 25 0 Etiwanda Ave Downey St E 0 0 0 0 0 2.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 68 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Widen AC paved road to 4 lanes other 6615 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 6665 Linda Rosea Rd 3 300 168 D 0 0 0 0 0 Anza Rd Via Cerro Vista E 1 0 0 0 0 .69 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 167 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 168 Mapes Rd 5 300 86 D 0 0 0 0 0 Briggs Rd E Valencia Ave 0.03 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .20 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 85 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 86 Marian Ave 1 300 68 D 0 0 0 0 0 Sangston Dr Mackay Dr E 0 1 0 0 0 .17 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 67 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 68 Market Street Bridge 2 300 878 D 54 0 0 102 204 Santa Ana River E 62 124 124 154 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 8 46 Replace bridge other 4296 C 0 0 0 0 0 Seek federal bridge replacement funds 300 Measure A/Western Total 5174 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 10 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 ( 13/14 14/15 Mayberry Ave 3 300 24 D 0 0 0 0 0 W'ly Bautista Ck Br Valle Vista Elem.Sch. E 0 0 0 0 0 .04 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 36 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const curb, gutter & sidewalk on north side other C 24 0 0 0 0 Add a sidewalk on north side of Bridge# S8159. 300 Measure A/Western Total 24 Mayberry Ave 3 300 60 D 0 0 0 0 0 Ply Dartmouth St Stafford St E 0 0 0 0 0 .11 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const curb, gutter & sidewalk on south side other 105 C 60 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 165 Mission Blvd Bridge 2 300 166 D 108 0 0 0 0 Santa Ana River E 58 0 0 0 0 .21 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Pursue Federal Bridge Replacement Funds other 5882 C 0 0 0 0 0 State Bridge # 56C-071, County Bridge# Sa161 300 Measure A/Western Total 6048 Mitchell Rd 3 300 376 D 0 1 0 0 0 Bautista Rd Regal Blue Tr E 0 1 0 0 0 1.43 (mi) 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 0 374 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 376 Mitchell Rd 3 300 143 D 0 0 0 0 0 Kirby Rd W'ly Bohlen Rd 0.11 mi E 0 1 0 0 0 .57 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 0 142 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 143 Monterey Ave at 1-10 4 301 10 D 0 0 0 0 0 C.L. Palm Desert N'ly Varner Rd 0.1 mi E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) 76 (ft)/ 90 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Realign/Add W.bound ramps, Widen Varner Rd, and other 1769 C 10 0 0 0 0 Install traffic signal at WB ramp. 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 1779 New Chicago Ave 3 300 205 D 0 21 0 0 0 Alto Dr Acacia Ave E 0 2 0 0 0 .13 (mi) 16 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Recon surface and widen road other C 0 182 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 205 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 11 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 112/13 113/14 ( 14/15 Norwood Dr 3 Acorn Ln N'ly & Sly 0.09 mi .09 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 31 D E R C 0 0 0 0 300 Measure 1 1 0 29 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total. 31 Nuevo Rd 5 Dunlap Dr Menifee Rd 2.01 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 56 (ft) Widen road to 4 lanes 300 other 5 4072 D E R C 0 0 0 0 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 4077 Nuevo Rd Interchange 1 I-215 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Widen Overcrossing and ramps Portion in SD 45. Portion in city of Perris 300 other 19 300 D E R C 0 0 0 0 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 0 5 4 0 0 Total 319 Old State Hwy 3 Green Ave SH 74 .61 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 497 D E R C 0 0 0 0 300 Measure 35 2 0 460 A/Western 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 497 Pala Rd 1 Temecula C.L. San Diego C.L. 1.55 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon AC paved road 300 other 220 D E R C 300 0 1 0 219 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 220 Palo Verde Area 4 various roads .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 302 other 665 D E R C 302 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 200 A/Palo 0 0 0 150 Verde 0 0 0 155 0 0 0 160 Total 665 Peach St 5 Esperanza Ave Ida Ave .17 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Grind and Resurf 300 other 27 D E R C 300 0 0 0 27 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 27 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 12 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 112/13 13/14 14/15 Pine Cove Rd 3 300 122 D 0 1 0 0 0 SH 243 W'ly 0.44 mi E 0 1 0 0 0 .44 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 120 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 122 Plum St 5 300 30 D 0 0 0 0 0 Esperanza Ave Ida Ave E 0 0 0 0 0 .17 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf other C 30 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 30 Pyrite St 2 300 591 D 55 0 0 0 0 Jurupa Rd Mission Blvd E 1 0 0 0 0 .61 (mi) 50 (ft)/ 60 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 535 0 0 0 0 Width varies from 29' to 60'. 300 Measure A/Western Total 591 Rainbow Canyon Rd 3 300 97 D 0 0 0 0 0 Frontage Rd / N San Diego C.L. E 1 0 0 0 0 .66 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 96 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 97 Ramon Rd/Bob Hope Dr Interchange 4 301 13 D 0 0 0 0 0 Ramon Rd Varner Rd E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Construct new interchange and bridge over RR along N'ly extension of Bob other 14092 C 13 0 0 0 0 Hope Dr. 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 14105 Ramona Expy 5 300 790 D 0 0 0 0 0 5th St Warren Rd E 0 0 0 0 0 4.40 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other 2800 C 790 0 0 0 0 Project is 1/3 in Supv.Dist.3. Coordinate with City of San Jacinto for 1/2 width, 1.8 mi. 300 Measure A/Western Total 3590 Ramona Expy 5 300 44 D 1 0 0 0 0 C.L. Perris C.L. San Jacinto E 1 0 0 0 0 8.00 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Install Radar Speed Feedback Sign at 4 locations other C 42 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 44 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 13 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x S1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 112/13 13/14 14/15 Riverside County Bridge Maintenance Program 3 300 200 D 40 40 40 40 40 Various locations Countywide E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Pursue federal bridge maintenance funds other C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 200 Riverside Dr 1 300 54 D 1 0 0 0 0 Lake Elsinore C.L. Laguna Ave E 1 0 0 0 0 .15 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 52 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 54 SR-74 5 300 10 D 10 0 0 0 0 Sultanas Rd Leon Rd E 0 0 0 0 0 .50 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const sidewalk on south side other 359 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 369 SR-86S at Airport Blvd (Ave 56) Ichg 4 301 30 D 10 0 0 0 0 Whitewater River Fillmore St E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const interchange other 28116 C 0 10 10 0 0 Caltrans is the lead agency. N'ly 1/2 is in the City of Coachella. Amounts shown are for County 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 28146 Sagebrush Ave 5 300 38 D 0 0 0 0 0 W'ly Cottonwood 0.02mi Verbenia Ave E 0 0 0 0 0 .14 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 38 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 38 San Jacinto St 5 301 93 D 0 0 0 0 0 Bubbling Wells Rd Yerxa Rd E 1 0 0 0 0 .21 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 92 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 93 San Juan Dr 5 300 50 D 0 0 0 0 0 Avenida Vizcaya Avenida Valencia E 1 0 0 0 0 .12 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 49 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 50 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 14 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x 81000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 San Timoteo Cyn 5 300 800 D 40 20 0 0 0 W Railroad X-ing1.39mi Beaumont C.L. E 0 1 0 0 0 2.30 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 739 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 800 Schteisman Rd Interchange 2 300 305 D 31 31 31 31 4 Hammer Ave I-15 E 41 41 20 0 0 .50 (mi) 24 (ft)/110 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const road, interchange and overcrossing other 37704 C 0 0 25 25 25 300 Measure A/Western Total 38009 Second Distrct Radar Speed Feedback Signs 2 300 1 D 0 0 0 0 0 Various locations E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Install solar powered radar speed feedback signs other C 1 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 1 Sultanas Rd 5 300 42 D 0 0 0 0 0 Alicante Dr S'ly 0.12 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .12 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 41 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 42 Sylvan Wy 3 300 177 D 0 1 0 0 0 Pine Cove Rd W'ly 0.62 mi E 0 1 0 0 0 .62 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 0 175 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 177 Tamarack Rd 5 300 237 D 0 0 0 0 0 W'ly Verbenia 0.57 mi Haugen Lehmann Wy E 0 0 0 0 0 .57 (mi) 48 (ft)/ 48 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 237 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 237 Tempe St 1 300 36 D 1 0 0 0 0 Grand Ave Lake Terrace Dr E 1 0 0 0 0 .09 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 34 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 36 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal. years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 15 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 113/14 14/15 Trimero Cir 5 301 34 D 0 0 0 0 0 Circle B Dr S'ly E 1 0 0 0 0 .08 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 33 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 34 Union Ave 1 300 61 D 0 0 0 0 0 Sangston Dr Mackay Dr E 0 1 0 0 0 .17 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 60 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 61 Van Buren Blvd Bridges 2 300 1147 D 0 0 0 0 0 Santa Ana River E 4 4 4 0 0 .10 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Replace existing bridges in cooperation with the City of Riverside. other 16203 C 659 463 13 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 17350 Via Cerro 2 300 387 D 0 30 0 0 0 Market St Via Ricardo E 0 2 0 0 0 .40 (mi) 61 (ft)/ 61 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 355 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 387 Via Cerro Vista 3 300 78 D 0 0 0 0 0 Linda Rosea Rd SW'ly 0.50 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .50 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 77 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 78 Via Sol Vista 3 300 17 D 0 0 0 0 0 Via Cerro Vista SE'ly 0.08 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .08 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 16 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 17 Vineland St 5 300 570 D 0 75 0 0 0 Edgar Canyon Channel E 0 15 0 0 0 .01 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Construct box culvert other C 0 0 480 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 570 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 16 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 Vista Grande Dr 5 301 35 D 1 0 0 0 0 Circle B Dr NW'ly & SE'ly E 1 0 0 0 0 .08 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 33 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 35 Washington St 1 300 1303 D 0 0 120 0 0 Tava Ln Hermosa Dr(City Limit) E 0 0 3 0 0 1.60 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 0 0 1180 0 This road received an interim overlay under B6-0565. 300 Measure A/Western Total 1303 Watkins Dr 5 300 157 D 30 0 0 0 0 I-215 Riverside C.L. E 3 0 0 0 0 .17 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 3 121 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 157 Worsley Rd 5 301 219 D 0 0 0 0 0 Dillon Rd Pierson Blvd E 0 0 0 1 0 2.63 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 0 0 0 218 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 219 Wrightwood Dr 3 300 51 D 0 1 0 0 0 Acorn Ln S'ly & W'ly 0.14 mi E 0 1 0 0 0 .14 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 0 49 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 51 Yerxa Rd 5 301 50 D 0 0 0 0 0 San Jacinto St Desert Hot Springs C.L E 1 0 0 0 0 .13 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 49 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 50 z* Future Projects 2 300 1450 D 0 0 0 0 0 District 2 Only E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 other 9700 C 0 0 0 0 1450 These funds will be used for pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 300 Measure A/Western Total 11150 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 17 05/05/2010 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EN (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Nay Acquisition E = Enviormental C = Construction Total 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 z* Future Projects 3 300 6050 D 0 0 0 0 0 District 3 Only E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 other 10200 C 0 0 2500 1250 2450 These funds will be used for various pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 300 Measure A/Western Total 16250 z* Future Projects 4 301 3650 D 0 0 0 0 0 District 4 Only E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 other 19650 C 0 950 950 850 900 These funds will be. used for pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 23300 z* Future Projects 5 300 3025 D 0 0 0 0 0 District 5 Only E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 other 6200 C 0 0 250 1250 1525 These funds will be used for various pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 300 Measure A/Western Total 9225 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2011-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 18 05/05/2010 Fund Source Fiscal Year (Amt x $1000) Fund Source Total Expenditure Source Nme 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 (Amt x $1000) 300 Measure A/Western 8989 6186 5447 5240 5488 31350 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 1558 1245 1270 1349 1395 6817 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 467 244 150 155 160 1176 * Grand Totals * 11014 7675 6867 6644 7043 39343 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2010-2014 srX7-11s REPo zr RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 1 11/24/2009 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Envior mental C = Construction Total 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 113/14 04th St 4 301 127 D 9 0 0 0 0 SR 111 Hammond Rd E 5 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 8 0 0 0 0 Const raised median at RR crossing other 219 C 4E11 0 0 0 0 Da/¢y 0%f4 RK Gaowzi•ne IL""i 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 346 20th St 2 300 433 D 20 0 0 D 0 W,ly Avalon St 0.4 mi Rubidoux Blvd E 1 0 0 0 0 .39 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C ® 0 0 0 0 Plav S rl,ek cnN,pl ef'¢ 300 Measure A/Western Total 433 21st Ave 5 301 12 D 0 1 0 0 0 W Circle B Dr 0.02 mi E Circle B Dr 0.02 mi E 0 1 0 0 0 .04 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C D 10 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 12 46th St 2 300 142 D 35 0 0 0 0 Riverview Dr SE'ly 800' E 1 ... 0 0 0 0 .15 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R D 0 0 Reconst and Widen AC Paved Road other C 1 105 D 0 0 Naves 14.07 C--,A-Hyt' l¢1-e. Leak, Pr' ar / 300 Measure A/Western Total 142 58th St 2 300 45 D S D 0 0 0 Beach St Cedar St E 1 0 0 0 0 .21 (mi) 42 (ft)/ 42 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 0 0 0 P kns nal- cc5wr101ei¢- 300 Measure A/Western Total 45 63rd St 2 300 51 D 5 0 0 0 0 Baker St Archer St E 1 0 0 0 0 .18 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) R i 0 0 0 0 Remove and replace AC surface other C 0 0 0 0 plays vtoi-cawrp(¢fe 300 Measure A/Western Total 51 68th St 2 300 18 D 0 0 0 0 0 I-15 E'ly E 0 0 0 0 0 .10 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const AC sidewalk on north side other 127 C 18 V 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 145 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2010-2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 2 11/24/2009 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmenta C = Construction Total 09/10 10/11 11/12 112/13 13/14 Acacia Ave 3 300 412 D / 30 0 0 0 0 Columbia St Meridian St E 2 0 0 0 0 1.00 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 380 0 0 0 D¢$; ��(Qy¢ci 300 Measure A/Western Total 412 Acacia Ave 3 300 129 D 0 0 0 D 0 Dartmouth St W'ly Stanford 0.05 mi E 0 0 0 0 0 .18 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 Const curb, gutter & sidewalk on south side other 61 C �� 0 0 0 0 /.4a ul b y cd c// b cy�, D/ 300 Measure A/Western Total 190 C.�vr �t iv( /O/ i I Acorn Ln 3 300 93 D 0 0 1 0 0 Sylvan Wy SW'ly 0.31 mi E 0 0 1 0 0 .31 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 0 91 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 93 Akipa Ct 1 300 2 D 0 0 0 0 0 Wanki Ave 439' Ely E 0 0 0 0 0 .08 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 / 0 0 0 0 Slurry Seal Type II other C 21/ 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 2 Akwo Cir 1 300 1 D 0 0 0 0 0 Woshka Ln 195' Ely E 0 0 0 0 0 .04 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Slurry Seal Type II other C 1 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 1 Alessandro Ave 3 300 507 D 35 0 0 0 0 S'ly Cypress 0.02 mi Ramona Expy E 2 0 0 0 0 _79 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf other C 0 470 0 0 0 "E>e3;pt d/I,7-1"(€41 300 Measure A/Western Total 507 Alexander St 1 300 20 D 7 0 0 0 0 Camino Del Sol March AFB Limits E 1 0 0 0 0 .04 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C AID 0 0 0 0 -liti¢.SIgn Jet pre?-yeS5 300 Measure A/Western Total 20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2010-2014 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 3 11/24/2009 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by FiscaL Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Alicante Dr 5 300 61 D 0 0 0 0 0 Capitola Ln Sultanas Rd E 0 1 0 0 0 .17 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 60 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 61 Alicante Dr 5 300 143 D 0 0 0 0 0 Briggs Rd Capitola Ln E 0 1 0 0 0 .32 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 142 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 143 Almond St 1 300 10 D 0 0 0 0 0 Waite St Lemon St E 0 0 0 0 0 .24 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Slurry Seal Type 1 - Cape Seal other C 10 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 10 Amethyst Rd 1 300 1 D 0 0 0 0 0 Canyon Crest St Virgo Wy E 0 0 0 0 0 .04 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 / 0 0 0 0 Slurry Seal Type II other C 1 V 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 1 Anderson Ct 3 300 1 D 0 0 0 0 0 Oakmont Dr 101' SEIy E 0 0 0 0 0 .02 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 / 0 0 0 0 Slurry Seal Type II other C 1 V 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 1 Angela Ave 2 300 28 D 5 0 0 0 0 58th St N'ly 0.12 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .12 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf with AHRM other C 0 0 0 0 p lare 5 46+ G1,1>vw2' «-e"" 300 Measure A/Western Total 28 Apache Tr/ I-10 Interchange 5 300 15 D 5 0 0 0 0 Seminole Dr Main St E 0_/ 0 0 0 0 .20 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) R 5 0 0 0 0 Const Roundabouts at 2 off/on ramp intersections to improve capacity of interchange. other C 5 0 0 0 0 Funds shown are for County activity only. 300 Measure A/Western Total 15 Bridgette Moore, Mayor 23873 Clinton Keith Rd, Ste 201 Marsha Swanson, Mayor Pro Tem Wildomar, CA 92595 Sheryl Ade, Council Member 951.677.7751 Phone Bob Cashman, Council Member 951.698.1463 Fax Scott Farnam, Council Member www.CityofWildomar.org May 28, 2010 To: Andrea Zurieck,RCTC Fr: Diane Nguyen, City of Wildomar Re: Measure A Status Report for FY 09/10 Andrea, please find attached the expenditures in the Measure A capital programs. A concise narrative summary is below: Accessibility and Improvements: Work underway to design and engineer accessibility improvements. Roadway Safety and Traffic Signal Program: No expenditures in these programs. City staff anticipates conceptual design of improvements to occur later in FY 09/10 and early FY 10/11. Slurry Seal Program: In partnership with Riverside County, construction was completed on slurry seal improvements throughout the City. The predominant expenditures reflect costs of construction. Unpaved Roadway Program: City staff is evaluating street segments & locations as part of conceptual design. Citywide Maintenance Program: Funding used for various citywide maintenance efforts with most of the funds for January and February storm repairs. Please contact me at 951-970-9741 for questions. Diane Dated: May 28, 2010 MEASURE A "BUDGET"MEASURE A "ACTUAL" Budget --Reflects FY 08/09 Plus FY 09/10 Revenue ($549,084.39 + $348,000 = $897,084)Spent to Date 28 901 25 Measure 'A' Accessibility Improvements 45,000.00$ 35,440.90$ 28 902 25 Measure 'A' Roadway Safety Improvements 50,000.00$ 0 28 903 25 Measure 'A' Slurry Seal Program 155,000.00$ 109,310.00$ 28 904 25 Measure 'A' Traffic Signal Program 331,317.64$ 0 28 905 25 Measure 'A' Unpaved Roadway Program 50,000.00$ 8,870.00$ 28 906 25 Measure 'A' Citywide Maintenance Program 194,000.00$ 137,348.10$ 8 percent set-aside for Measure A Finance/Administration (8% of $897,084)71,766.75$ 23,277.52$ 897,084.39$ 314,246.52$ City of Wildomar Measure A Status Report July 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010 Bridgette Moore, Mayor 23873 Clinton Keith Rd, Ste 201 Marsha Swanson, Mayor Pro Tem Wildomar, CA 92595 Sheryl Ade, Council Member 951.677.7751 Phone Bob Cashman, Council Member 951.698.1463 Fax Scott Farnam, Council Member www.CityofWildomar.org May 18, 2010 Shirley Medina, Program Manager Attention: Andrea Zureick, Senior Staff Analyst - Programming Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor SUBJECT: CITY OF WILDOMAR MEASURE A 5-YEAR CIP Dear Ms. Medina: Please find enclosed The City of Wildomar’s Measure A 5-Year Expenditure Plan. The City Council of the City of Wildomar will take action on this plan at its June 9, 2010 meeting. I will forward you an executed resolution after the meeting. If you have any questions, please contact me at 951-970-9741. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Diane Nguyen Transportation Programs Manager Attachment A DRAFT MEASURE A EXPENDITURE PLAN Fiscal Year 2010/11 – 2014/15 CITY OF WILDOMAR LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM Prepared May 18, 2010 (Pending City Council approval June 9, 2010) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2010 - 2011 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 18, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 Accessibility Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Citywide Maintenance Program 8% Overhead/Admin Line-Item Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal as needed Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets Interfund Transfer $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $50,000 $66,980 $27,920 $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $29,100 $66,980 $27,920 TOTAL Measure A Funds: $349,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2011 - 2012 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 18, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 Accessibility Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Citywide Maintenance Program 8% Overhead/Admin Line-Item Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal as needed Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets Interfund Transfer $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $50,000 $74,758 $28,560 $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $28,682 $74,758 $28,560 TOTAL Measure A Funds: $357,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2012 - 2013 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 13, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 Accessibility Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Citywide Maintenance Program 8% Overhead/Admin Line-Item Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal as needed Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets Interfund Transfer $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $50,000 $85,304 $29,440 $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $28,256 $85,304 $29,440 TOTAL Measure A Funds: $368,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2013 - 2014 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 18, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 Accessibility Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Citywide Maintenance Program 8% Overhead/Admin Line-item Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal as needed Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets Interfund Transfer $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $50,000 $98,619 $30,560 $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $27,821 $98,619 $30,560 TOTAL Measure A Funds: $382,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2014 - 2015 Agency: City of Wildomar Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, Public Works Director Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 18, 2010 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 3 4 5 Accessibility Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Roadway Safety Improvements Program (various project locations citywide) Slurry Seal Program (various project locations citywide) Unpaved Roadway Enhancements Program (various project locations citywide) Citywide Maintenance Program 8% Overhead/Finance Line-item Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety improvements Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal as needed Repair or reconstruct unpaved roadways Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects; widening streets Interfund Transfer $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $50,000 $117,463 $32,160 $20,000 $50,000 $155,000 $27,377 $117,463 $32,160 TOTAL Measure A Funds: $402,000 • AGENDA ITEM 81 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Technical Advisory Committee Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Measure A Local Streets and Roads — Maintenance of Effort Base Year Extension for Fiscal Year 2010/1 1 and the 2009 Maintenance of Effort Guidelines BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE, TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve using the 1989 Measure A Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base year amount for the FY 2010/11 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE certification; 2) For cities incorporated in or after 1989, excluding the cities of Menifee and Wildomar, approve using the Proposition 42 MOE amount for the FY 2010/1 1 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE certification; and 3) Approve the 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE Guidelines. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The 2009 Measure A ordinance established a local agency MOE requirement to ensure that Measure A funds do not supplant local discretionary funds for local streets and roads improvements. If local agencies do not meet their respective MOE base year level in a given year, Measure A Local Streets and Roads allocations will be withheld the following year. The Commission is authorized to establish guidelines for determining compliance with the MOE requirement. Last year, Commission staff and members of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) reviewed the methodology that was used in developing the 1989 MOE base year, which was the amount of construction and maintenance expenditures that local agencies included in the State Controller Streets report in 1989. Initially, staff believed that applying this method for construction and maintenance expenditures included in the State Controller Streets report in 2008, would be appropriate in determining the 2009 MOE base year for each local agency. However, during this Agenda Item 81 165 review, staff and TAC members concluded that there were reporting inconsistencies and variances in the State Controller Streets report. Therefore, at last year's Commission meeting, Commission staff and the TAC recommended allowing more time to develop an alternative method to calculate the 2009 MOE base year, as well as a new method to report street expenditures. It was also recommended that the 1989 MOE base year levels be used for FY 2009/10 reporting, which the Commission approved. Over the past year, several meetings have been held with the TAC subcommittee and TAC to develop a way to calculate the 2009 MOE base year and reporting method. The following is being recommended for the 2009 MOE base year calculation: • Local agencies will identifyall general fund expenditures for transportation related construction and maintenance activities that occurred in FY 2009/10. • Local agencies will summarize the expenditures and identify expenditures to be considered as deductions, such as administrative/overhead costs and one-time expenditures. • Deductions will be reviewed and approved/rejected by the TAC subcommittee. • The approved deductions will be subtracted from general fund expenditures to determine the 2009 MOE base year for each city. The following is being recommended for 2009 MOE annual certification reporting: • Local agencies will complete the MOE report template to include discretionary general fund expenditures for construction and maintenance activities for the reporting year. • General ledger documentation/forms must be submitted as an attachment to the MOE report template. • MOE reports will be submitted to the Commission's auditor. • Commission staff will report to the TAC and Commission regarding the outcome of the auditor's findings regarding agencies meeting the MOE base year levels. • Local agencies that do not meet their MOE base year may submit a request for special consideration, which will be presented to the Commission. At its June 21 meeting, the TAC approved the draft 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE Guidelines (Attachment 1). Implementation of the 2009 MOE requirement will begin using FY 2009/10 general ledger information to establish a MOE base year for each city. Since FY 2009/10 general ledger information will not be available until FY 2010/11, the MOE base Agenda Item 81 • • • 166 • • year cannot be established and used for meeting the MOE base year requirement until FY 2011 /12. Therefore, Commission staff and the TAC recommend an extension of the 1989 MOE base year levels for the FY 2010/11 MOE certifications. For agencies that were incorporated in or after the 1989 Measure A MOE base year levels were established, it is recommended that these cities comply with the MOE levels used for Proposition 42 funds. The newly incorporated cities of Menifee and Wildomar will not have a MOE base year amount for reporting in FY 2010/11. However, these local agencies will be required to meet their MOE base year once the FY 2009/10 base year level is established for each local agency per the process identified in this agenda item and the 2009 Measure A MOE Guidelines. Attachment 2 is the recommended MOE base year amounts for the cities to use for their FY 2010/11 MOE certification. Attachments: 1) Draft 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads MOE Guidelines 2) Recommended FY 2010/11 Measure A MOE Base Year Levels Agenda Item 81 167 ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2009 MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES (Draft, June 16, 2010) General Program Policy 1 Authority and Purpose of Guidelines. Ordinance No. 02-001, adopted by the Riverside County Transportation Commission in 2002, approved a county -wide transportation expenditure plan and called for the placement of Measure A on the November ballot to secure voter approval of a %2 percent sales tax to fund transportation improvements. On November 5, 2002, Riverside County voters approved Measure A and collection of the sales tax commenced on July 1, 2009. Ordinance No. 02-001, in accordance with state law, imposes specific requirements that local agencies must meet to receive Measure A funds. In particular, the Ordinance requires that local agencies continue to expend the same amount for construction and maintenance of local streets and roads as expended in the past. The guidelines set forth below establish specific maintenance of effort requirements and are intended to satisfy the Commission's responsibility to ensure that local transportation expenditures are maintained. Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Requirements 2. Qualifications to Receive Measure A Local Streets and Roads Funds. To qualify for Measure A Local Streets and Roads (LSR) funding, Ordinance No. 02-001 requires local agencies to adhere to a number of requirements, which currently include: a. Implementation of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) developed by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) or the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) (not applicable to Palo Verde Valley area local agencies); b. Participation in the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) (applies to Western County local agencies only); c. Annual submittal of a list of proposed Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)/activities for Measure A LSR funds for a five year fiscal period; and d. Annual certification of discretionary General Fund expenditures for transportation related construction and maintenance activities meet or exceed the MOE Base Year amount (Attachment A), and commit to expending Measure A LSR funds to projects indentified in the agency's five year CIP. 168 Funds withheld from a local agency for failure to meets its MOE Base Year requirement will be distributed in accordance with Ordinance No. 02-01 within the Measure A area in which the agency is located (Western County, Coachella Valley, or Palo Verde Valley). 3. Calculation of MOE Base Year. The calculation of the MOE Base Year will be based on local agency discretionary General Fund expenditures for transportation related construction and maintenance activities that occurred in Fiscal Year 2009/10. Local agencies will summarize the expenditures and identify expenditures to be considered as deductions such as administrative/overhead costs that were not project specific and one- time expenditures. These deductions will be presented to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Subcommittee for review and approval. The approved deduction items will be subtracted from the total General Fund expenditures to determine the MOE Base Year for each city. A MOE Report Template (Attachment B) will be provided by Commission staff to the local agencies along with instructions to complete the report template. For local agencies that incorporate after July 1, 2009, the third fiscal year after incorporation will be used to determine the MOE Base Year and these local agencies will follow these guidelines for annually reporting construction and maintenance expenditures, MOE certification, and CIP submittal. Local agencies' MOE Base Years will be effective for the life of the 2009 Measure A program. 4. 2009 MOE Annual Certification Reporting. Annually, local agencies will complete the MOE Report Template to include discretionary General Fund expenditures for construction and maintenance activities for the reporting year. Local agencies should identify proposed deductions, if any, for non -project specific administrative/overhead costs and one-time expenditures for the reporting year on a comparable basis to the MOE Base Year calculation. Any new deductions will be reviewed by the TAC Subcommittee and Commission staff to ensure that deductions are appropriately applied. Additionally, local agencies will be required to submit documentation of expenditures by submitting General Ledger forms as an attachment to the MOE Report Template. Local agencies will be contacted if further information or clarification is needed. The MOE Reports and supporting documentation will be submitted to the Commission's auditors. The results of the audit process will be presented to the TAC and Commission and will indicate whether or not the local agencies are meeting the MOE Base Year amounts. 5. Requests for Special Consideration. When a determination has been made that a local agency has not met its MOE Base Year amount the local agency can file a request for special consideration with the Commission. The local agency must present evidence to the Commission demonstrating the need for special consideration. The Commission will • • • 169 • • • consider the special circumstances presented by the local agency and either approve or deny the request. Implementation of 2009 MOE Certification 6. Effective Date. The first year that the local agencies will certify under these guidelines is Fiscal Year 2011/12. Local Agencies will certify that discretionary General Fund transportation construction and maintenance expenditures for Fiscal Year 201 l/12 will meet or exceed the 2009 MOE Base Year amount, and that Measure A LSR formula funds are designated to fund projects identified in its Measure A 5-year CIP submittal. The MOE certification is required to be signed by the City Manager. 7. 1989 MOE Carryover Balance. Local agencies that have positive balances from the 1989 MOE cycle will be allowed to carryover the balance into the 2009 MOE cycle for a limited period. Carryover balances will be determined from RCTC audit reports. The carryover only applies to the first two years of the 2009 Measure A MOE certification requirements. Therefore, carryover balances from FY 2008/09 can be carried over to meet the FY 2009/10 MOE certification, and FY 2009/10 balances can be carried over to meet the FY 2010/11 MOE certification. 8. 2009 MOE Excess Carryover. Carryover balances will be determined from RCTC audit reports. If a local agency has reported expenditures above the MOE Base Year level, the amount in excess of the MOE Base Year level can be applied in a future year to offset the amount the local agency may need to meet the MOE requirement. The use of excess carryover was also allowed under the 1989 MOE guidelines. Submittal Timelines for CIP, MOE Certification, MOE Report Template and Deductions 9. Submittal timelines. The timelines below are to be considered "general' and may be modified based on unique circumstances or to provide additional time as needed. 5-year CIP and MOE Certification Submittal: March The Commission will notify each local agency Public Works and Finance Departments that the 5-year CIP and MOE Certification are due. The notification will include Measure A revenue projections for LSR funds to assist the local agencies in preparing their respective CIPs. May Local Agencies will submit 5-year CIPs and MOE Certifications. July Commission staff will recommend that the Commission approve local agency 5-year CIPs. 170 MOE Reporting and Proposed Deductions: June TAC Subcommittee will convene to review the MOE Report Template, reporting instructions, and definitions to ensure that the MOE reporting process is applied in a consistent and streamlined manner. July Commission staff will notify local agencies that the MOE Report Template and proposed deductions are due and indicate due dates. Instructions will also be included for the MOE Report Template. August Local Agencies will submit proposed one-time deductions. Commission staff and the TAC subcommittee will review the proposed deductions for appropriateness. Commission staff will inform local agencies if proposed deductions are accepted for MOE Reporting. September Local Agencies will complete and submit the MOE Report Template and General Ledger support documentation. Sep —Nov Local Agency staff submits MOE Reports and General Ledger support documentation to auditors. Sep - March Auditors will submit findings to Commission staff. June Commission staff will present audit findings to TAC and Commission. MOE Certification Process Review 10. Review of MOE Reports/Process. As indicated above, to ensure consistency in reporting expenditures and deductions, the TAC Subcommittee will convene annually to review the MOE certification process including proposed deductions, instructions, and definitions of expenditures. • 171 • 2010-2039 MEASURE A PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned hereby agrees and certifies for (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Measure A — Local Streets and Roads) shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary General Funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation (construction and maintenance) purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Program. Enclosure: Agency 5-Year CIP • • City Manager Date 172 • FY 2009/10 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures (Round to nearest dollar) • • ATTACHMENT 2 Funding Breakdown Project Expenditures Included in General Ledger ; Total Cost Construction: 1. Project al 2. Project p2 Maintenance: I. Project pl 2. Project N2 Engineering/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to Specific Projects: $ $ General Fund Meas A Federal State City Funds Other Deductions for Special Consideration (Deductions Must Also Be Included in Protect Expenditures Above): Total Project Cost General Fund State Reason Why Project Expenditure Should Be Deducted from MOE Construction: Maintenance: Engineering/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to Specific Projects $ $ - r,ri°II ant `d4d#titis" $ 173 Fiscal Year 2010111 Measure A Maintenance of Effort ATTACHMENT 3 Western County Beaumont Calimesa Corona Hemet Lake Elsinore Murrieta Norco Perris Riverside San Jacinto Temecula 1989 MOE Base Year $ 164,325 $ 70,702 N/A N/A $ 1,784,399 $ 1,183,605 $ 503,339 $ 943,143 N/A 1,259 $ 399,945 $ 12,449,203 $ 143,347 N/A Prop 42 MOE 7,294 6,063 52,625 2,785,034 Coachella Valley Agency Coachella Desert Hot Spr Indian Wells Indio Palm Desert Rancho Mirage 1989 MOE Base Year $ 625,230 $ 69,663 $ 57,586 $ 55,962 $ 465,763 $ 904,798 $ 1,892,584 $ 1,191,036 Palo Verde Valley Blythe $ 475,677 174 AGENDA ITEM 8J • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Edda Rosso, Capital Projects Manager Richard Bryan, Bechtel Rail Projects Manager Erik Galloway, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement with HDR Engineering Inc. for Construction Management Services for the Perris Valley Line Project WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 10-31-058-00 to HDR Engineering Inc. (HDR), to provide construction management (CM) services for the Perris Valley Line (PVL) project for a base amount of $15,950,146, plus a contingency amount of $1.6 million, for a total not to exceed amount of $17,550,146; 2) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director to approve contingency work as may be required for the project; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute related utility and other local agency agreements necessary for the design and construction of the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The PVL Metrolink extension continues to be one of the Commission's top priorities. The PVL project was included in both Measure A expenditure plans and has received significant approvals and funding from the Federal transit Administration (FTA) and Congress, which appropriated $75 million for the project. Most importantly, the project offers an important opportunity for renewed transportation investment that establishes a strong transit backbone for Western Riverside County while offering an alternative to vehicular travel on Interstate 215. 175 Agenda Item 8J At its September 12, 2007 meeting, the Commission awarded an agreement to STV Inc. (STV) to provide planning, environmental, and preliminary engineering services for the PVL. STV completed the preliminary engineering phase of its services on June 1, 2009, with the submittal of the 30% design deliverable. At its May 13, 2009 meeting, the Commission approved an amendment to STV's agreement for advanced preliminary engineering, final design, support for procurement of construction materials, and design support during construction of the PVL. In addition, the Commission approved the development of a federal supplemental environmental assessment (SEA) and an environmental impact report (EIR) for the PVL project. On April 5, 2010, the draft EIR was issued for public comment. Public hearings were held on April 14 and 22 and May 17, and the public comment period closed on May 24, 2010. Once the EIR and SEA are finalized and the finding of no significant impact and notice of determination are issued and approval is received from FTA in the form of a project construction grant agreement, the Commission can commence with final design and start construction of the project, respectively. It is anticipated that when the project receives environmental approval, the project will be advertised for construction in early 2011. Prior to advertisement of the project for construction, staff plans to establish an agreement with a qualified CM consultant to perform the following tasks:. Phase I: Preconstruction • Develop a number of required manuals and plans (i.e. CM procedures manual and safety program, QA/QC audit plan, environmental control plan, project control plan, project procedures manual); • Perform a constructability and design review of the preliminary and final plans and estimate; • Develop a constructability analysis report that will include construction phasing plan and project master schedule; and • Assist in the prequalification of potential construction contractors, and support the bid/award process. Phase II: Construction • Perform all CM duties; • Coordinate flagging: Schedule Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) flagging, assign watch persons for protection of workers and equipment under CM purview, assure that all CM field personnel complete, and stay current with freight railroad safety training; and • Conduct systems inspection, testing, commissioning, and start-up. 176 • • • Agenda Item 8J • Phase III: Post Construction • Perform contract close-out duties; • Monitor and track warranties; and • Coordinate station turn over to Commission and its maintenance contractors. The phasing of CM services is the preferred practice on large infrastructure projects and many of the pre -construction phase services are specifically required by FTA. FTA will only allow a notice to proceed (NTP) for the pre -construction phase services prior to environmental clearance; however, staff has negotiated the complete scope of work for all phases of the project. The scope, cost, and schedule has been broken up to reflect the phasing of the project and to allow NTP's to be issued for the separate phases. Selection Process A request for qualifications for construction management services for the PVL project was issued on January 14, 2010, and a pre -submittal conference was held on February 2, to present the project and answer any questions for the interested parties. Five consultants' statements of qualifications (SOQ) were submitted prior to the March 25 deadline. An evaluation committee was appointed to review the five submitted SOQ's received and to conduct interviews of the short listed firms. The evaluation committee members included two representatives from the Commission staff, and one representative each from Bechtel, SCRRA, and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway. After evaluation of the SOQ's by the evaluation committee, three firms were short listed and notified on April 22, 2010, that they would be interviewed. The firms included: • HDR Engineering, Inc. • Hill International, Inc. • PB Americas, Inc. Interviews of firms were conducted on May 12, and HDR was selected by the evaluation committee as the most qualified consultant. Commission staff has negotiated with HDR to ensure their rates and fees are comparable to other consultants for similar types of work and that the costs reflect the current economic conditions. The contract has been negotiated consistent with requirements for federal funding participation. In the course of the negotiations, Agenda Item 8J 177 the consultant agreed to the following reductions: Fee from 10% to 8%, escalation allowance from 4% to 2% and markup on subcontractors from 5% to 3%. In addition, the consultant has represented a 10.74% commitment to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) program. Financial Information Yes FY 2010/11 $1,800,000 In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2010/11 Amount: $3,057,680 N/A FY 201 1 /12 $9,500,000 N/A FY 2012/13 $3,192,466 Source of Funds: Measure A Rail Funds, FTA 5307 Budget Adjustment: Yes - $3,057,680 G LlProject Accounting No.: 003800 81302 221 33 81301 - $1,146,200 003823 81302 221 33 81301 - $16,403,946 Fiscal Procedures Approved: 4;4342 Date: 07/06/10 Attachment: Agreement with HDR Agenda Item 8J • 178 AGREEMENT NO. 10-31-058-00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ASSISTANCE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT WITH HDR CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, MATERIALS TESTING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVEYING SERVICES FOR THE PERRIS VALLEY LINE METROLINK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2010, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("the Commission") and HDR CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION ("Consultant"), a Nevada corporation. 2. RECITALS. 2.1 On November 8, 1988, the voters of Riverside County approved Measure A authorizing the collection of a one-half percent (%2%) retail transactions and use tax to fund transportation programs and improvements within the County of Riverside, and adopting the Riverside County Transportation Improvement Plan (the "Plan"). 2.2 Pursuant to Public Utility Code Sections 240000 et seq. the Commission is authorized to allocate the proceeds of the Tax in furtherance of the Plan. 2.3 On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved an extension of the Measure A tax for an additional thirty (30) years for the continued funding of transportation and improvements within the County of Riverside. 2.4 A source of funding for payment for professional services provided under this Agreement is federal funds from the Federal Transit Administration ("FTA"). This Agreement shall not be deemed to be approved by the Commission until the certifications shown in Exhibits "E" and "F," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, are executed. HVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 179 2.5 Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the Commission on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing construction management, materials testing, and construction. surveying services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California (if necessary), and is familiar with the plans of the Commission. 2.6 The Commission desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the Perris Valley Line Metrolink Improvement Project ("Project"), as set forth in this Agreement. 2.7 The Commission intends to authorize performance of the Services, as that term is defined in this Agreement, in at least two Notices -to -Proceed ("NTP") identified as follows: Pre -Construction Phase Services and Construction Phase Services. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that issuance of an NTP for the Construction Phase Services will be contingent on execution of a Construction Grant Agreement by and between the Commission and the FTA. 3. TERMS. 3.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant shall furnish all technical and professional services, including labor, material, equipment, transportation, supervision and expertise, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the construction management, materials testing, and construction surveying services necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Pre -Construction Phase Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" Part 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Construction Phase Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" Part 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.2 Commencement of Services. 3.2.1 Pre -Construction Phase Services. The Consultant shall commence performance of the Pre -Construction Services upon receipt of a written NTP or "Limited NTP" from Commission. As a result of the federal funding for this Project, and to the extent the FTA or the California Department of Transportation ("Ca!trans") procedures apply in connection therewith, issuance of a NTP is conditional until completion and approval of a post award audit. The attached Exhibit "C" and the Consultant's cost proposal for the Services are subject to a post award audit. After any post award audit recommendations are received, the attached Exhibit "C" and the Consultant's cost proposal shall be adjusted by the Consultant and approved by the Commission's Executive Director or his designee to conform to the audit recommendations. The Consultant agrees that individual items of cost may be RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 z2 • • • 180 • • incorporated into the Agreement at the Commission's sole discretion. Refusal by the Consultant to incorporate the interim audit or post award recommendations will be considered a breach of the Agreement terms and cause for termination of the Agreement. The federal aid provided under this Agreement is contingent on meeting all Federal requirements and could be withdrawn, thereby entitling the Commission to terminate this Agreement, if the procedures are not completed. The Consultant's files shall be maintained in a manner to facilitate Federal and State process reviews. In addition, the applicable federal agency, or Caltrans acting on behalf of a federal agency, may require that prior to performance of any work for which Federal reimbursement is requested and provided, that said federal agency or Caltrans must give to Commission an "Authorization to Proceed". 3.2.2 Construction Phase Services. The Consultant shall not commence performance of the Construction Phase Services until Consultant receives a written NTP or "Limited NTP" from the Commission for the Construction Phase Services. Consultant shall not be entitled to compensation for any Construction Phase Services rendered prior to the issuance by the Commission of a written NTP or Limited NTP specifically for the Construction Phase Services. As applicable, the above referenced provisions regarding federal procedures and requirements shall apply to this Section 3.2.2. 3.3 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of execution of this Agreement or the date of issuance of the "Notice to Proceed" by the Commission, whichever occurs first, to the issuance by the Commission to Consultant of a Notice of Final Acceptance, as defined in paragraph 3.12 below, or October 30, 2013, whichever occurs earlier, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. All applicable indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect following the termination of this Agreement. 3.4 Commission's Representative. The Commission hereby designates the Commission's Executive Director, or his or her designee, to act as its Representa- tive for the performance of this Agreement ("Commission's Representative"). Commission's Representative shall have the authority to act on behalf of the Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Commission's Representative shall also review and give approval, as needed, to the details of Consultant's work as it progresses. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the Commission's Representative or his or her designee. 3.5 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Brent Felker, Senior Vice President, to act as its Representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to act on behalf of Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 -3- 181 professional skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall work closely and cooperate fully with Commission's Representative and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction over, or an interest in, the Services. Consultant's Representative shall be available to the Commission staff at all reasonable times. Any substitution in Consultant's Representative shall be approved in writing by Commission's Representative. 3.6 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to the Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval by the Commission. In the event that the Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of the key personnel, the Commission shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause, pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.14. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are: Project Director - Brent Felker Project Manager - Marc McIntyre Project Controls - Manager Chris Okerstrom Resident Engineer - Len Beystrum Commissioning/Startup Manager - Noel Peck Signals/Systems Lead - Glenn Breindel Safety/RR Coordinator - Roberto Becerra 3.7 Preliminary Review of Work. All reports, working papers, and similar work products prepared for submission in the course of providing Services under this Agreement shall be submitted to the Commission's Representative in draft form, and the Commission may require revisions of such drafts prior to formal submission and approval. In the event plans and designs are to be developed as part of the Project, final detailed plans and designs shall be contingent upon obtaining environmental clearance as may be required in connection with federal funding. In the event that Commission's Representative, in his sole discretion, determines the formally submitted work product to be not in accordance with the standard of care established under this contract, Commission's Representative may require Consultant to revise and resubmit the work at no cost to the Commission. 3.8 Appearance at Hearings. If and when required by the Commission, Consultant shall render assistance at public hearings or other meetings related to the Project or necessary to the performance of the Services. However, Consultant shall not be required to, and will not, render any decision, interpretation or recommendation regarding questions of a legal nature or which may be construed as constituting a legal opinion. AVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 t} • 182 • • • 3.9 Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform all Services, duties and obligations required by this Agreement to fully and adequately complete the Project. Consultant shall perform the Services and duties in conformance to and consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of Califomia. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Consultant further represents and warrants to the Commission that its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the Commission, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement arising from the Consultant's errors and omissions. Any employee of Consultant or its sub - consultants who is determined by the Commission to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the Commission, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project. 3.10 Opportunity to Cure. Commission may provide Consultant an opportunity to cure, at Consultant's expense, all errors and omissions which may be disclosed during Project implementation. Should Consultant fail to make such correction in a timely manner, such correction may be made by the Commission, and the cost thereof charged to Consultant. 3.11 Inspection of Work. Consultant shall allow the Commission's Representative to inspect or review Consultant's work in progress at any reasonable time. 3.12 Final Acceptance. Upon determination by the Commission that Consultant has satisfactorily completed the Services required under this Agreement and within the term set forth in Section 3.3, the Commission shall give Consultant a written Notice of Final Acceptance. Upon receipt of such notice, Consultant shall incur no further costs hereunder, unless otherwise specified in the Notice of Final Acceptance. Consultant may request issuance of a Notice of Final Acceptance when, in -its opinion, it has satisfactorily completed all Services required under the terms of this Agreement. In the event copyrights are permitted under this Agreement, then in connection with federal funding, it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that the FTA shall have the royalty -free non-exclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, the work for governmental purposes. RVPUB\HSHANE\772691.1 rj 183 3.13 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by Jaw. For example, and not by way, of limitation, Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all implementing regulations, design standards, specifications, previous commitments that must be incorporated in the design of the Project, and administrative controls including those of the FTA. Compliance with federal procedures may include completion of the applicable environmental documents and approval by the FTA. For example, and not by way of limitation, a signed Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact, or published Record of Decision may be required to be approved and/or completed by the FTA Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. Further, and to the extent applicable, Consultant must fully comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in furnishing or using equipment and/or providing services, including, but not limited to, emissions limits and permitting requirements imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and/or California Air Resources Board (CARE). Although the SCAQMD and CARB limits and requirements are more broad, Consultant shall specifically be aware of their application to "portable equipment", which definition is considered by SCAQMD and GARB to include any item of equipment with a fuel -powered engine. Consultant shall indemnify the Commission against any fines or penalties imposed by SCAQMD, CARE, or any other governmental or regulatory agency for violations of applicable laws, rules and/or regulations by Consultant, its Subconsultants, or others for whom Consultant is responsible under its indemnity obligations provided for in this Agreement. 3.14 Termination. 3.14.1 Notice; Reason. Commission may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, at any time by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof ("Notice of Termination"). Such termination may be for Commission's convenience or because of Consultant's failure to perform its duties and obligations under this -Agree- ment, including, but not limited to, the failure of Consultant to timely perform Services pursuant to the Schedule of Services described in Section 3.15 of this Agreement. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.14.2 Discontinuance of Services. Upon receipt of the written Notice of Termination, Consultant shall discontinue all affected Services as directed in RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 {T • • • 184 • • the Notice or as otherwise provided herein, and deliver to the Commission all Documents and Data, as defined in this Agreement, as may have been prepared or accumulated by Consultant in performance of the Services, whether completed or in progress. 3.14.3 Effect of Termination For Convenience. If the termination is to be for the convenience of the Commission, the Commission shall compensate Consultant for Services fully and adequately provided through the effective date of termination. Such payment shall include a prorated amount of profit, if applicable, but no amount shall be paid for anticipated profit on unperformed Services. Consultant shall provide documentation deemed adequate by Commission's Representative to show the Services actually completed by Consultant prior to the effective date of termination. This Agreement shall terminate on the effective date of the Notice of Termination. 3.14.4 Effect of Termination for Cause. If the termination is for cause, Consultant shall be compensated for those Services which have been fully and adequately completed and accepted by the Commission as of the date the Commission provides the Notice of Termination. In such case, the Commission may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise. further, Consultant shall be liable to the Commission for any reasonable additional costs incurred by the Commission to revise work for which the Commission has compensated Consultant under this Agreement, but which the Commission has determined in its sole discretion needs to be revised, in part or whole, to complete the Project because it did not meet the standard of care established in Section 3.9. Termination of this Agreement for cause may be considered by the Commission in determining whether to enter into future agreements with Consultant. 3.14.5 Cumulative Remedies. The rights and remedies of the Parties provided in this Section are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Agreement. 3.14.6 Procurement of Similar Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated, in whole or in part, as provided by this Section, the Commission may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it deems appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.14.7 Waivers. Consultant, in executing this Agreement, shall be deemed to have waived any and all claims for damages which may otherwise arise from the Commission's termination of this Agreement, for convenience or cause, as provided in this Section. 3.15 Schedule and Progress of Services. 3.15.1 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 $- 185 Services for the Pre -Construction Phase Services as set forth in Exhibit "B" Part 1, and for the Construction Phase Services as set forth in Exhibit "B" Part 2, both attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedules for the Pre -Construction Phase Services and the Construction Phase Services, the Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of Commission's Representative, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet each Schedule of Services. 3.15.2 Modification of the Schedule. Consultant shall regularly report to the Commission, through correspondence or progress reports, its progress in providing required Services within the scheduled time periods. Commission shall be promptly informed of all anticipated delays. In the event that Consultant determines that a schedule modification is necessary, Consultant shall promptly submit a revised Schedule of Services for approval by Commission's Representative. 3.15.3 Trend Meetings. Consultant shall conduct trend meetings with the Commission's Representative and other interested parties, as requested by the Commission, on a bi-weekly basis or as may be mutually scheduled by the Parties at a standard day and time. These trend meetings will encompass focused and informal discussions concerning scope, schedule, and current progress of Services, relevant cost issues, and future Project objectives. Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation and distribution of meeting agendas to be received by the Commission and other attendees no later than three (3) working days prior to the meeting. 3.15.4 Progress Reports. As part of its monthly invoice, Consultant shall submit a progress report, in a form determined by the Commission, which will indicate the progress achieved during the previous month in relation to the Schedule of Services. Submission of such progress report by Consultant shall be a condition precedent to receipt of payment from the Commission for each monthly invoice submitted. 3.16 Delay in Performance. 3.16.1 Excusable Delays. Should Consultant be delayed or - prevented from the timely performance of any act or Services required by the terms of the Agreement by reason of acts of God or of the public enemy, acts or omissions of the Commission or other governmental agencies in either their sovereign or cgntractual capacities, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes or unusually severe weather, performance of such act shall be excused for the period of such delay. 3.16.2 Written Notice. If Consultant believes it is entitled to an extension of time due to conditions set forth in subsection 3.16.1, Consultant shall pro- vide written notice to the Commission within seven (7) working days from the time RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 $ • 186 • • • Consultant knows, or reasonably should have known, that performance of the Services will be delayed due to such conditions. Failure of Consultant to provide such timely notice shall constitute a waiver by Consultant of any right to an excusable delay in time of performance. 3.16.3 Mutual Agreement. Performance of any Services under this Agreement may be delayed upon mutual agreement of the Parties. Upon such agreement, Consultant's Schedule of Services shall be extended as necessary by the Commission. Consultant shall take all reasonable steps to minimize delay in completion, and additional costs, resulting from any such extension. 3.17 Status of Consultant/Subconsultants. 3.17.1 Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee, agent or representative of the Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such personnel, including but not limited to, social security taxes, income tax withholdings, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.17.2 Prevailing Wages. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at the Commission's offices. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. Certified Payrolls are to be submitted whenever required by Prevailing Wage laws. RVPUR\HSHANE\772641.1 1} 187 3.17.3 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.17.4 Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of the Commission. If Consultant wishes to use a firm as a subcontractor which is not specified in the proposal upon which this Agreement was awarded, prior written approval must be obtained from the Commission. The Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Consultant has, as part of its proposal, identified certain companies/firms that will be subconsultants utilized by Consultant ("Subconsultants") for Project delivery. A list of said Subconsultants is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" Part 2 and made a part hereof. The Commission hereby approves the use by Consultant of the Subconsultants identified in Exhibit "C" Part 2. In the event and prior to the replacement of any Subconsultant approved herein, the Consultant shall seek and obtain the Commission's written approval. Exhibit "C" Part 2 also sets forth the rates at which each Subconsultant shall bill the Consultant for Services and that are subject to reimbursement by the Commission to Consultant. Additional Direct Costs, as defined in Exhibit "C" Part 1 shall be the same for both the Consultant and all subconsultants, unless otherwise identified in Exhibit "C" Part 2. Consultant acknowledges that approval of Consultant's utilization of the identified Subconsultants together with the incorporation of Subconsultants' rate schedules and cost proposals into this Agreement shall in no way be construed to create any contractual relationship between any Subconsultant and the Commission. The Subconsultant rate schedules and cost proposals contained herein, are for accounting purposes only. In the event that any Subconsultant shall bring any action, claim or proceeding purporting to enforce any right purportedly arising under this Agreement, the Consultant shall be responsible for the Commission's reasonable legal fees without regard to the merits of any such claim. 3.18 Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality. 3.18.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub -license any and all copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 �fl 188 • Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the Commission. Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission's sole risk. 3.18.2Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media ("Intellectual Property") prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement as well as any ,other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement. The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid for wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant, and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute separate written assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon request of Commission. Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above -referenced Intellectual Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission. All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which.. are not the copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise identified and stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as provided herein. RVPUB\HSHNNE\772641.1 189 Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub -license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional, or supplemental work created under this Agreement. 3.18.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.19 Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify and. hold Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to alleged negligent acts, omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of consequential damages, expert witness fees, and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against Commission or its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse Commission and its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Commission, its `directors, officials officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. Consultant's obligations as set forth in this Section 3.19 shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. RVPUMHSHANE\772691.1 12 • 190 3.20 Insurance. 3.20.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.20.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto); and (3) if Consultant has employees, Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal and advertising injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 3.20.3 Professional Liability. Consultant shall procure and maintain, and require its sub -consultants to procure and maintain, for a period of five (5) years following completion of the Project, errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to their profession. Such insurance shall be in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per claim. 3.20.4 Aircraft Liability Insurance. Prior to the direct or indirect use of any civil aircraft to provide Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall procure and maintain, or cause to be procured and maintained, aircraft liability insurance or equivalent form, with a single limit of not less than $5,000,000 per each occurrence. RVPUB\HSHANE\772691.1 13 191 Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non -owned aircraft and passengers, and shall name, or be endorsed to name, the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants and agents as additional insureds with respect to the Services or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant. 3.20.5Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. The general liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the Services or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (B) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that: (A) coverage shall not be suspended, voided or canceled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the Commission; and (B) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents. RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 14 • 192 • • • 3.20.6 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the Commission does not approve the deductibles or self -insured retentions as presented, Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.20.7 Separation of Insureds; No Special Limitations. All insurance required by this Section shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions. In addition, such insurance shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, and agents. 3.20.8Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Commission. 3.20.9 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.20.10 Other Insurance. At its option, the Commission may require such additional coverage(s), limits and/or the reduction of deductibles or retentions it considers reasonable and prudent based upon risk factors that may directly or indirectly impact the Project. In retaining this option Commission does not warrant Consultant's insurance program to be adequate. Consultant shall have the right to purchase insurance in addition to the insurance required in this Section. 3.21 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state arad federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and RVPUB\HSHANE\772691.1 15 193 wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.22 Fees and Payment. 3.22.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Total Compensation shall be on the basis of direct costs plus a fixed fee as further set forth in Exhibit "C". The maximum compensation for Pre -Construction Phase Services, including Railroad :Liability Insurance, rendered under this Agreement shall not exceed Two Million, Three Hundred Thirty Four Thousand, Seven Hundred Ninety Nine Dollars ($2,334,799). The maximum compensation for Construction Phase Services rendered under this Agreement, including post construction Services, as further set forth in Exhibit "A", shall not exceed Thirteen Million, Six Hundred Fifteen Thousand, Three Hundred Forty Eight Dollars ($13,615,348). 3.22.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the Statement. Charges specific to each Milestone listed in the Schedule of Services shall be listed separately on an attachment to each statement. Each statement shall be accompanied by a monthly progress report and spreadsheets showing hours expended for each task for each month and the total Project to date. Each statement shall include a cover sheet bearing a certification as to the accuracy of the statement signed by the Consultant's Project Manager or other authorized officer. 3.22.3 Additional Work. Any work or activities that are in addition to, or otherwise outside of, the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall only be performed pursuant to a separate agreement between the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Commission's Executive Director may make a change to the Agreement, other than a Cardinal Change. For purposes of this Agreement, a Cardinal Change is a change which is "outside the scope" of the Agreement; in other words, work which should not be regarded as having been fairly and reasonably within the contemplation of the parties when the Agreement was entered into. An example of a change which is not a Cardinal Change would be where, in a contract to construct a building there are many changes in the materials used, but the size and layout of the building remains the same. Cardinal Changes are not within the authority of this provision to order, and shall be processed by the Commission as "sole source" procurements according to applicable law, including the requirements of FTA Circular 4220.1 F, paragraph 9(f). RVPUB\HSHANE\772691.1 16 • • • 194 • • • (a) In addition to the changes authorized above, a modification which is signed by Consultant and the Commission's Executive Director, other than a Cardinal Change, may be made in order to: (1) make a negotiated equitable adjustment to the Agreement price, delivery schedule and other terms resulting from the issuance of a Change Order, (2) reflect definitive letter contracts, and (3) reflect other agreements of the parties modifying the terms of this Agreement ("Bilateral Contract Modification"). (b) Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for any change, without written authorization from the Commission's Executive Director as set forth herein. In the event such a change authorization is not issued and signed by the Commission's Executive Director, Consultant shall not provide such change. 3.22.4 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by the Commission's Representative. 3.23 Prohibited Interests. 3.23.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 3.23.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of the Commission, during the term of his or her service with the Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.23.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission, is prohibited. 3.23.4 Covenant Against Contingent Fees. As required in connection with federal funding, the Consultant warrants that he/she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he/she has not paid or agreed RVPOB\HSHANE\772691.1 195 to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or formation of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability pursuant to Section 3.14, or at its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 3.23.5 Covenant Against Expenditure of Local Agency, State or Federal Funds for Lobbying. The Consultant certifies that to the best of his/ her knowledge and belief no state, federal or local agency appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid by or on behalf of the Consultant to any person for the purpose of influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any state or federal agency; a Member of the State Legislature or United States Congress; an officer or employee of the Legislature or Congress; or any employee of a Member of the Legislature or Congress, in connection with the award of any state or federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, or the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any state or federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. a) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid to any person for the purpose of influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency; a Member of Congress; an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress; in connection with this Agreement, the Consultant shall complete and submit the attached Exhibit "J", Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with the attached instructions. b) The Consultant's certification provided in this section is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this Agreement was entered into, and is a prerequisite for entering into this Agreement pursuant to Section 1352, Title 31, US. Code. Failure to comply with the restrictions on expenditures, or the disclosure and certification requirements set forth in Section 1352, Title 31, US. Code may result in a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. c) The Consultant also agrees by signing this Agreement that he/she shall require that the language set forth in this Section 3.23.5 be included in all Consultant subcontracts which exceed $100,000, and that all such subcontractors shall certify and disclose accordingly. 3.24 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred and fees charged under this Agreement. As required in connection with federal funding, the Federal Acquisition Regulations in Title 48, CFR 31 shall be the governing factors regarding allowable elements of cost. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant RVPUB\HSHANE\772691.1 �$ 196 • shall allow a representative of the Commission during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of any and all ledgers and books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and any other records or documents created pursuant to this Agreement. All such information shall be retained by Consultant for at least three (3) years following termination of this Agreement. Following final settlement of the contract accounts with the FTA under this Agreement, such records and documents may be microfilmed at the option of the Commission, but in any event shall be retained for said three (3) year period after processing of the final voucher by the FTA. Any costs for which payment has been made to the Consultant that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq. are subject to repayment by the Consultant to the Commission. 3.25 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of the Commission's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related Commission programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.26 Right to Employ Other Consultants. Commission reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with the Project. Consultant shall cooperate fully with any other consultant engaged by the Commission on the Project. 3.27 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed with the laws of the State of Califomia. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.28 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorneys' fees and, all other costs of such actions. 3.29 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.30 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained. in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. RVPUS\HSHANE\772641.1 19 197 3.31 Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: 8404 Indian Hills Omaha, NE CONSULTANT: COMMISSION: HDR Construction Control Corporation Riverside County 8404 Indian Hills Transportation Commission Omaha, NE 68114 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Brent Felker Attn: Executive Director 68114 Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.32 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 3.33 Amendment or Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.34 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements or understandings. 3.35 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.36 Provisions Applicable When Federal Transit Administration Are Involved. Since funding for the Services provided by this Agreement are provided, in whole or in part, from the FTA, Consultant shall also fully and adequately comply with the provisions included in Exhibit "D" (Federal Transit Administration Requirements) attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3.37 No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition,' nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 �Q • • 198 • • 3.38 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to be performed after any expiration or termination of this Agreement shall survive any such expiration or termination. 3.39 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.40 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.41. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.42 Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 21 199 SIGNATURE PAGE TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ASSISTANCE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CONSULTANT HDR CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION By: By. Bob Buster, Chair Signature Approved as to Form: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel RVPUB\HSHANE\772691.1 22 Attest: By: Name Title Its: Secretary • • 200 • EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit A 201 • • • Draft Scope of Work for Perris Valley Line Metrolink Improvement Project Phase 1: Pre -Construction Services A. Management/Coordination 1. Management and Coordination Services Perform general management of staff and coordination with RCTC, RCTC Program Manager and other stakeholder and team members. 2. Review Project Issues and Assist with Resolution or Evaluation Assist RCTC in reviewing issues not covered or included in this Scope of Work and other pre -construction tasks. 3. CM Procedures Manual Prepare a CM Procedures Manual (CMPM) for non -highway projects that will become a useful tool for the successful management of the PVL Project. Discuss the project issues with the responsible RCTC/RCTC Program Manager staff members to develop an understanding of the philosophy behind the existing draft CMPM and the associated existing procedures. Expand upon the draft to fully address the Manual's key sections and subsections in the following ways: Project Information and Management • Include updated project description and background information • Identify and update all project participants and stakeholders • Identify and update all levels of authority • Address: o Safety and Security o Crisis / accident management o Public Affairs/Media management o Coordination with public and private agencies and organizations o Coordination of construction with utility relocations, rail operations, and other 3rd party work o Commissioning and startup Construction Administration • Incorporate the document control system currently used by RCTC/RCTC Program Manager • Discuss CM document control system and address need to transfer digital files to RCTC at end of project PI 203 • List currently scheduled or future meetings regarding the project • Include updated status of FTA participation and identify requirements for funding • Address the following: o Document control issues o Processing of Submittals, Requests for Information and Substitution Requests o Conduct and recording of meetings o Written and verbal communications o Daily project reports and photo/video documentation of the work o Partnering Changes and Claims Management • Provide updated outline of RCTC change order process from initiation to approval, including authorization levels • Include updated RCTC process for administering project disputes and construction claims • List current assessment of major risks to the project • Address the following: o Fair and independent cost estimates o Change order processing o Time extension requests o Resolution of disputed issues o Claims o Entitlement evaluation Cost and Schedule Management P. 2 • Include updated project budgets, funding sources, restrictions and schedules • Outline progress payment process, including time tables and all parties involved in the process • Incorporate into existing procedures the lessons learned from previous project experiences with: o Progress payment processing, including bid item breakdowns o Cash flow management o Schedule submittal and review process o Time extension requests 204 • • Construction Quality Assurance and Quality Control • Outline the anticipated RCTC/RCTC Program Manager oversight efforts and coordination required • Update the existing draft RCTC Quality Assurance Plan • Incorporate into existing procedures the lessons teamed from previous project experiences with: o Daily inspection reports or verification tests o Certificates of completion o Factory or plant inspections and tests o Performance tests Project Close-out • Include updated close-out procedurestfinal occupancy for RCTC rail projects • List identified close-out procedures for FTA rail projects and resources for obtaining requirements • Incorporate into existing procedures the lessons learned from previous project experiences with: o Final punchlists and close-out of construction contracts o As -built drawings and as -built schedules o Project records transfer and subsequent audits or use o Warranties Items that RCTC may consider adding to this plan, and that we can incorporate with an amended scope include the following: • Acting as Owners Representative coordination with public and private agencies and organizations • Partnering • Cash flow management The updated draft of the CM Procedures Manual will be submitted for RCTC review and comment. Once revisions have been made and approved, the Manual will be used by the HDR Team to administer and manage the PVL construction project. The Project Manager and Resident Engineer will stress the importance of HDR's Team adherence to the procedures in the Manual, and will require advanced approval of any proposed variances. The Manual will be updated and revised, as needed, for the duration of the project. 4. Project Procedures Manual Prepare the PPM, with some elements pulled directly from the CM Procedures Manual discussed above, under Task 1, and other elements from the contract documents. The PPM will provide detailed and PVL project -specific procedures for the flow and control of communications and project documents during the construction phase. P3 205 The Manual will include details and/or contract procedures for the following major topics: ■ RCTC-HDR Team Organization ■ Contractor Organization ■ Roles & Responsibilities ■ Lines of Communication Hierarchy ■ Communication Formats ■ Community Relations/Media ■ Emergency Response Procedures • OSHA & Other Communications ■ Notice Procedures ■ Labor Compliance • Environmental Compliance ■ BNSF/SCRAA Coordination ■ FTA Requirements • Safety Program • Meetings ■ Project Controls ■ Cost Segregation/Trending ■ Progress Payments ■ Schedule Reviews ■ Submittals ■ Requests for Substitutions ■ Requests for Information ■ Changes ■ Delays . ■ Dispute &Claim Resolution ■ QC/QA Requirements & Responsibilities ■ Non -Compliance Reports ■ Survey Control ■ Contract Close -Out ■ As -Built Documentation ■ Document Control Requirements ■ Project File Requirements The PPM will reference other stand alone documents that will be utilized in managing the PVL. The PPM is not intended as a substitute for the Contract and will state that in the event of a conflict, the Contract requirements will govem. The initial draft of the PPM will be updated, as needed, to reflect the 100% design documents and any changes to procedures made by addenda issued during the bid period. Upon review and approval by RCTC, the PPM will be distributed at the Pre -construction Meeting and each section discussed, allowing for questions or clarifications. The Manual will be corrected or updated, as necessary, during the construction phase. This manual will incorporate any stand alone documents required. 5. Construction Safety Plan and Roadway Worker Safety Manual The Perris Valley Line Construction Safety Plan and Roadway Worker Safety Manual will be focused on the health and safety of the HDR construction management team and our subconsultants as it relates to our work on the Perris Valley Line. RCTC has indicated that you may choose to utilize the documents as a basis for your overall construction safety plan. RCTC will need to evaluate the applicability of this plan for your organization in the overall off -highway safety plan currently under development, as the plan is not intended to be adopted verbatim into your overall construction program. 6. Support Development of Agreements with SCRRA and BNSF Assist RCTC in developing and negotiating agreements with SCRRA and BNSF. This task includes the review of documents and attending meetings with the agencies. 7. Public Outreach P. 4 • Assist RCTC with providing public outreach services as outlined below: Prepare a Draft and Final Public Outreach Plan (POP) of outreach tasks, deliverables and key dates. • • 206 • • Develop, and update a database of property owners, tenants and key stakeholders, including elected officials, city and county staff, resource agencies, businesses, schools, emergency responders, utility providers, and other interested parties in the Riverside, Moreno Valley and Perris corridor. • Prepare a project newsletter, following RCTC's standards. The newsletter will be prepared in English and Spanish, distributed to stakeholders, and posted to the project website. The publication will be updated on a quarterly basis. • Develop and maintain a project website, following RCTC's standards. The website will include maps and information about construction, stations, project schedule, meeting information and opportunities for feedback about the project. • Coordinate three public information meetings prior to the start of construction. 8. Support Bid/Award Process RCTC's Contract Manager will manage the bidding period and evaluations, with HDR assisting as requested to perform the various tasks, including those identified below. This is an allowance item, as the scope will be further defined as RCTC's Contract Manager assesses need. Assist RCTC in compiling any pre -qualification packages to be sent to prospective bidders. Assist RCTC in preparing and responding to comments from pre -bid meetings. Bids Evaluation - When the bids are received, Assist RCTC with the bid review, addressing the following: • Compliance with the contract documents; • Review in consideration that all elements of the contract scope are addressed; • Review in consideration of out -of -balance bid items or any unusual items • Verify that the pricing appears reasonable. Make a recommendation of award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Advise RCTC's Project Manager as to the timing for issuance of the NTP. B. Project Controls 1. Prepare Project Controls Plan and FTA Reporting Plan Prepare Project Controls Plan and FTA Reporting Plan. The Plan will outline the Project Control Manager's (PCM) role in taking the lead for the pre -construction project controls tasks, including the merging of the CM, Designer and RCTC costs and schedule items to produce a comprehensive schedule and cost reporting system. This will include software utilized, reporting frequency (monthly and quarterly) and content specific for each report. The Project Controls Plan will be prepared in accordance RCTC's Quality Assurance Plan and elements will include cost forecasting, trending analysis, budgets, commitments, schedule, document control, and reporting procedures. All of this will roll up into the documentation for reporting to FTA. We will meet with RCTC and FTA representative if appropriate to establish the reporting requirements. P. 5 207 2. Document Control Training/Plan Integration of Document Control System with all users Train and familiarize staff on the document control system (Infoworks) to be utilized on the project. RCTC will provide access to the system and software as well as training for staff. Initial training of HDR Team members will include Resident Engineer, Project Controls manager and Project Manager. 3. Review Schedule, Cost and Construction Phasing Strategy and Prepare Master Schedule • Schedule — During pre -construction, prepare a detailed cost loaded Primavera schedule that will be incorporated into a master program schedule, provided by the RCTC Program Manager. Manage the schedule throughout preconstruction and analyze the schedule impacts of design and management decisions. Recommend changes as required. Verify that design requirements and third party approvals will be incorporated into the schedule so that RCTC can have an accurate forecast of the anticipated commencement of construction. Review, evaluate and determine the critical path of the Project in the aforementioned cost -loaded Master Schedule. Recommend schedule contingencies to RCTC's schedule strategy. Cost - The Master Schedule will be used to create cash flow projections for the project. RCTC will provide cost data for all expenditures outside of the CM services and construction hard costs. Review the cost of each activity in the schedule and update monthly. The cash flow projections will then be communicated to the RCTC staff responsible for funding and managing the cash flow for the project. Tailor cost reports and cost coding system to coordinate with existing RCTC accounting methodologies. A WBS will be agreed upon to track costs. 4. Cost Risk Analysis (CRA) Conduct a cost risk analysis for the Perris Valley Line project. CRA Work Breakdown Sub -Task 0.1— Documentation Review and Internal Review Session The first step in the cost analysis consists of reviewing all existing project documentation, including: The baseline cost estimates; The baseline project schedule; Relevant technical reports or memoranda; Design drawings; and Others, as identified by the project team. A preliminary listing of risks is also developed under sub -Task 1.1, with assistance from the project team. Three categories P. 6 208 • • • of risks are typically considered: — Budget risks: reflect the uncertainty inherent to the estimation of project costs (at any stage of design) and represent the risks that the budget elements will deviate from the base estimate. Event risks: risks of intemal or externat events that force the project team to work beyond the estimate, just to meet the Project Scope and Statement of Work. Examples include: extreme weather, contractor non-performance, vandalism at construction site, archeological findings, labor issues such as strikes, or undiscovered utilities. Scope risks: risks of significant changes to the project scope due to extemal pressures. Examples of scope risks include: community pressures for changes in alignment or station location, or unfavorable environmental assessment report leading to changes to the project design.' A review session is conducted intemally (within the risk team) to discuss findings from the documentation review, expand and edit the listing of budget, event and scope risks and develop material for the preparation session (sub -Task 1.2). The Cost Risk Analysis is typically initiated at this time. This process involves: - Reviewing scope, schedule and cost assumptions by independent experts; — Explicitly identifying contingency and separating it from baseline estimate; — Assess historical price fluctuations for key project components; - Develop forecasts for key project components; and Identify and quantify uncertainty in baseline cost estimates over the project life cycle. Sub -Task 0.2 - Preparation Session A preparation session will be held in early November, shortly after project initiation. The session is facilitated by a member of the risk team (the risk lead). Participants include members of the project team and other members of the risk team. The main objectives of the preparation session are: - For the project team to get acquainted with the risk analysis process; For the risk team to obtain first-hand cost and schedule information from the project team, and require clarifications on any of the documentation reviewed under sub -Task 1.1; For the project and risk teams to jointly develop a project flowchart: a simplified representation of the project schedule where project tasks are combined within relatively homogenous activities, and where dependencies among activities, and the project (most) critical path, are highlighted. P. 7 209 The flowchart is reviewed subsequently by the entire risk team, and finalized during the risk analysis workshop (sub-4111 TASK 1.4). It is used, among other things, to allocate event risks to specific activities and to estimate the impact of those risks on the baseline project completion date. It is also used to distribute (allocate) project costs over time and estimate cost escalation, with and without project delays. Sub -Task 0.3 - Develop Simulation Model A customized cost and schedule simulation model will be developed under this task. The model will be, in large part, structured around the (preliminary) project flowchart created during the preparation session. The model will employ Monte Carlo simulation techniques to combine the risks identified under sub -Tasks 1.1 and 1.2 and produce probability distributions for total project costs and project completion date? Sub -Task 0.4 • Conduct Risk Analysis Workshop Facilitate a risk analysis workshop to review, discuss, and refine all baseline cost estimates, scheduling assumptions, risk factors and proposed mitigation strategies. The workshop will be conducted over 3 days, and facilitated by the risk lead. Participants to the workshop include members of the risk team, the cost lead, various Subject Matter Experts (engineers, planners, developers, construction economists, etc.), and selected members of the project team. The main objectives of the workshop are to: Provide an overview of the Cost Risk Assessment process and develop a common understanding among workshop• participants regarding purpose, assumptions and outcomes; Provide an overview of the project. This sub task is typically led by a member of the project team. Review and validate the project baseline schedule and baseline cost estimates. Review and quantify all risk factors and their implications in terms of cost and/or schedule; and Identify, discuss, and quantify mitigation strategies for key project cost and schedule risks. During the session, the cost and schedule risks are entered into a risk register. The register combines information on the nature of the risk (a brief description of the event or scope change), its probability of occurrence, its cost and/or schedule impact (expressed as a probability distribution), and the activities potentially impacted. Sub -Task 0.5 - Produce Risk -Adjusted Cost and Schedule Estimates The outcomes of the risk analysis include: P. 8 210 Detailed probable cost and schedule outcomes arrayed against their respective probability of occurrence (i.e., a full probability distribution for total project costs, and expected completion date) The identification of key risk factors and their estimated impact on project costs and schedule The identification of mitigation strategies and their estimated impact on project costs and schedule — An estimate of the expected cash flow requirements through the end of the project. Sub -Task 0.6 — Presentation of Preliminary Results The results of the risk analysis will be summarized in a PowerPoint presentation and distributed for review and comments. Members of the risk team will present and discuss the findings with the project team via a telephone conference call. Sub -Task 0.7 - Follow-up, Updates and Reporting A draft final and final report will be developed after presentation of the preliminary results. The final report will include: — An introduction with an overview of the project and project objectives; — A description of the project flowchart, and simulation scenarios (if any); A summary of key modeling assumptions; A presentation and discussion of the simulation results (including cost and schedule probability distributions, tornado charts and cash flow requirement charts); Appendices providing supporting material (summary of base cost validation, base schedule durations, risk register, list of workshop attendees, etc.) C. Quality Assurance 1. Construction Manager QA/QC Plan The QAP outlines the overall quality program for all public transportation services that fall under the jurisdiction of the RCTC. As such, any entity contracted by the RCTC must perform its work in accordance with the RCTC Quality Assurance Plan (QAP). The Perris Valley Line Quality Assurance Plan (PVL QAP) will be a standalone document and is intended to establish a well structured and systematic approach to verify that expected and accepted levels of quality are reached throughout the project duration. The plan will be developed in accordance with the RCTC QAP, Federal Transit Authority (FTA) "Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines, FTA-MA-06-0189-92-1", as well as Ca!trans-Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), Chapter 16 — Administer Construction Contracts, Section 14 — Quality Assurance Program for FHWA funded local agency projects. The PVL QAP will outline responsibilities for the CM Team to perform QA audits on the contractor and RCTC will be performing QA over the CM services. P. 9 211 The PVL QAP will include the following 15 key elements: 1. Management Responsibility 2. Documented Quality Systems 3. Engineering Control 4. Document Control 5. Purchasing 6. Product Identification and Traceability 7. Process Control 8. Inspection and Testing 9. Inspection, Measuring and Test Equipment 2. Constructability Analysis at 90% Design Completion 10. Inspection and Test Status 11. Non -Conformances 12. Corrective Actions 13. Quality Records 14. Quality Audits 15. Indoctrination and Training Identify problems and provide detailed and meaningful solutions to help deliver a complete, cohesive and constructible set of contract documents. A review team will be established, consisting of multiple team members, including transit rail design and construction engineers and technical specialist s to review all aspects of the contract documents from a construction perspective. A kick-off meeting with HDR team and RCTC to discuss scope of work and schedule requirements, and leam as much as possible regarding key project issues, constraints and requirements, special areas of focus, and any future significant changes RCTC is planning for the next submittal. Perform a detailed review of the contract documents available at this design stage. Pay particular attention to freight staging, right-of-way issues, and potential utility conflicts. Review the existing site conditions with the contract documents to verify site access, parking, lay down areas, temporary utility requirements and other issues related to the efficient utilization of the construction sites. Site visits will identify potential contract provisions for legal access to the site along the entire corridor. Particular attention will be paid to the dust and erosion control issues and neighborhood impacts during the construction phase. Site visits will accomplish the following: • Visit the mainline right of way and each facility site location to evaluate the provisions in the contract documents relating to these issues. • Review the construction limits of each site. Evaluate the Location of potential team jobsite offices and parking with the goal of minimizing relocations and maximizing communication during construction. • Consider traffic patterns for access to the site for impact on the surrounding neighborhood. • Evaluate the adequacy and potential location of temporary utilities. • Identify potential areas for storage of long lead items, parking and material storage. • Review historical records of utilities from RCTC and compare with drawings and field conditions. Become familiar with the easement agreements and conditions. Assist in monitoring relocation prior to construction. • Review RCTC provided survey data and ROW mapping. Field survey verification can be provided but is not included in the scope at this time for preconstruction. Formulate recommendations to RCTC to for revisions to the contract documents reviewed. Prepare a "Site Access Map", providing a schematic drawing of all access points in relation to major street crossings. All the above data will be compiled P. 10 • 212 FD3. • and reviewed with the FOR and ROTC to determine whether to make revisions to the bid documents. • Check the plans for consistency between the various disciplines of work; verify that the work shown in the plans is covered by a contract bid item and specification; identify potential conflicts with adjacent projects; and verify that the construction details appear to be complete and biddable. Provide detailed comments and recommendations to RCTC and the FOR in a comment review form spreadsheet and be accompanied by red -lined plans and specifications. Summarize the findings in a letter report that describes the documents that were reviewed, and our major findings and recommendations. A follow-up meeting will be conducted to discuss the issues and answer any questions. Construction Phasing - Discussions have occurred to date between RCTC and BNSF to determine construction phasing that will allow efficient construction operations with the least impact to the BNSF freight service. The Master Schedule will reflect the sequencing discussed between the parties to date. 3. Perform 90% Design Review and Compliance at 100% A review team will be established, consisting of multiple team members with both specialized and multi -disciplinary experience in commuter rail transit design, including construction engineers, systems engineers and civil/track engineers to review all aspects of the contract documents from a design and construction perspective. Schedule and manage a kick-off meeting with HDR team, the design team, and RCTC to review the design criteria (SCRRA) and project details; discuss scope of work and schedule requirements, constraints and requirements, special areas of focus, and any future significant changes the FOR is planning for the next submittal. Utilize experienced design engineers familiar with SCRRA standards. Provide design comments to RCTC design engineers and engineer or record. Schedule and manage a meeting with them to resolve and discuss issues. Review 100% design drawings to confirm that 90% comments have been addressed. No check of calculations is anticipated at this time, but can be completed if requested. 4. Review 90% Cost Estimate and Provide Final Detailed Cost Estimate at 100% Review and comment on the construction cost estimate that has been prepared by RCTC Program Manager from the 90% design documents. A detailed independent cost estimate will be provided. S. Conduct Pre -Condition Survey Review survey documentation obtained from RCTC to check horizontal and vertical project control, right of way maps, legal descriptions and plats, design files, and improvement plans as they pertain to the project. Recover and verify project survey control. Nominal hours will be used by survey crew to verify conditions during the constructability review. P. 11 213 ID: 6. Provide Inspection for Pre -Construction Utility Relocation Work Provide QA inspection to verify that utilities are relocated beyond the limits of planned improvements and that new. connections to be established prior to contractor mobilization are constructed per the contract requirements. As -built drawings documenting all work performed during this phase will be created and made readily available for use by the project team during construction. Review utility matrix, utility agreements and other supporting documents provided by RCTC. D. Environmental 1. Construction Environmental Control Plan As part of the pre -construction activities, prepare a Construction Environmental Control Plan (CECP). Review RCTC's Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan prior to developing the CECP. Outline the monitoring and surveying required for biological, paleontological, archaeological and other environmental issues to verify construction activities are conducted in accordance with applicable environmental requirements as outlined in the CEQA and NEPA document for the project and current regulatory requirements. RCTC will provide a mitigation monitoring and reporting plan for HDR's use, anticipated for sometime in August 2010. Specific issues to address in the CECP include 1) Archeological and paleontological monitoring during ground -disturbing activities of depths of four feet or more, including • work at various station locations, the Citrus Connection, and the Layover Facility; 2) Archeological monitoring of all work between MP 3.50 and MP 4.50, and MP 5.60 and MP 6.50; 3) Monitoring requirement resulting from permit conditions of resource agencies; 4) Standard stormwater quality monitoring; 5) Preconstruction surveys for endangered bird species; 6) Condition that no work be performed in the Box Spring Canyon Reserve during the bird nesting season, and at all other locations vegetation clearing must occur outside of the bird nesting season; and 7) Verification of NEPA/CEQA mitigation for noise in Riverside residential area, requiring construction of soundwalls along property boundaries. Other considerations include handling of hazardous materials, traffic impacts, noise impacts and air quality issues. Environmental permits will be assessed and monitoring activities required will be listed in the plan, including the 401 permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers and the 1600 Agreement with California Department of Fish and Game (conceming the Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement P.12 214 Task 1.5 Final CECP Based upon comments from RCTC, we will finalize the CECP to produce a final document. Assumes 20 hard copies (in binders) and 1 electronic copy of the final report. 2. Environmental Survey Verify that site conditions continue to reflect conditions identified during planning for environmental issues. Confirm the presence or absence of sensitive biological resources. Provide preconstruction surveys for the following species: • Burrowing owls • Southwestern willow flycatchers • Least Bell's vireos • Califomia gnatcatchers • Yellow -billed cuckoos • Nesting bird surveys per the Migratory Bird Treaty Act • Western Spadefoot Toad (San Jacinto River Bridge and Overflow Channel area) Additional sensitive species can be addressed, as needed, based upon the outcome of the CEQAINEPA documents and recommended mitigation measures. The preconstruction surveys may also reveal additional sensitive species surveys are warranted. All biological resources work will be carried out by individuals who hold required California and Federal permits to work with these and other species that may become relevant to the project. Adhere to USFWS or other adopted protocols. Based upon the results of the preconstruction surveys, identify additional protection or avoidance measures to minimize potential impacts to sensitive species. This information will be provided to the Engineer of Record for their use in finalizing the contract documents and requirements of the contractor. Coordinate the environmental monitoring team throughout the duration of the project. Task 1 PRE -CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS Task 1.1 Rail Safety Training for Environmental Monitoring Team P. I4 This task covers rail safety training for all monitoring staff. HDR assumes training of up to 16 people (one 8-hour day to cover training and travel) so we have multiple team members that can rotate into the monitoring. While this training is required annually, we have budgeted for one training cycle, with the assumption that the second year training would occur concurrent to monitoring Task 1.2 Biological Resource (Pre -Construction) Task 1.2.1 Burrowing Owl (BUOW) Preconstruction survey 216 • • This task assumes a pre -construction BUOW survey is required along the entire project corridor. Kleinfelder will have performed a habitat assessment (including appropriate buffers) as part of the biological resources support for the EIR preparation and the assessment covers the project impact area and appropriate buffer area required by the wildlife agencies. No included budget to conduct a habitat assessment for any portion of the project corridor is assumed. Due to the phased construction process and size of the site, 8 protocol surveys have been budgeted. The task includes a survey of areas for potential burrows, and 4 follow up surveys for owls in areas with potential burrows to see if they are being used. With regard to the timing of the protocol surveys, notification at least 45 days prior to construction commencing in an area that requires surveys is necessary. This provides the 30 days needed to conduct the surveys, as well as a two -week time frame to mobilize the biologists. Please see the attached budget spreadsheet for the cost to conduct the preconstruction survey. Mitigation for burrowing owls within 50 meters of the project site without 6.5 acres of forage habitat typically consists of a combination of avoidance and if necessary relocation of the burrow outside of the breeding season. At the time this scope of work was prepared, the project is in the Draft EIR stage and the specific BUOW mitigation plan has not yet been prepared, nor is it possible to estimate the number of owls which may require mitigation. This task includes an additional 80 hours (beyond the survey effort noted above) to implement mitigation efforts should burrowing owls be found on the project site. If additional mitigation support beyond the 80 hours is needed, an amended scope of work would be needed prior to initiating the additional mitigation support. Task 1.2.2 Environmental Worker Awareness Training Per Mitigation Measures of DEIR BR-1, prepare a power point presentation to educate the construction crew on the biological resource issues on the site. Conduct one large training session at the start of the construction phase. The presentation will also usable in a printed format that can be presented in the field to small groups by the monitors as the project continues. Helmet stickers will be provided for those who attend the course RCTC will provide a location for the large training. Phase 2: Construction Phase Services A. Management/Coordination 1. Conferences/Meetings Project Manager, Resident Engineer, all technical leads, and the Labor Compliance Officer will attend the pre - construction conference. Schedule and lead the pre -construction meeting. Compile a list of the appropriate municipalities, fire, life safety, and law enforcement agencies, the appropriate utility companies and other applicable parties and prepare the agenda. Weekly safety meetings will be held on the project by both the contractor and the CM Team. Attend both meetings to verify that safety is held as the highest priority on the project. Weekly progress meetings will be held with the contractor. Prepare the agendas, including review of the project P. 15 217 schedules, a summary of submittals, RFI's, and Non Conformance Reports (NCR's) — indicating status, old business not • yet resolved, and new issues that require follow-up. Schedule, lead and/or attend meetings with local agencies, utilities, community groups, or other entities that RCTC believes would be useful in communicating the progress or intentions of the contractor on the project. The contractor will be required to submit work plans for critical work elements. Hold a pre -work meeting to review the approved work plan and discuss any concems to verify that risk points have been addressed and that a backup plan is in place to implement, should it become necessary. 2. Public Affairs Provide Public Affairs assistance for the HDR team and outreach activities for PVL, including: Task 2.1: Public Outreach Plan In coordination with RCTC, implement the Public Outreach Plan (POP) developed in the pre -construction phase. Task 2.2: Stakeholder Database Update the stakeholder database at regular intervals and provide to RCTC upon request. Task 2.3: Prolect Newsletter Prepare a project newsletter, following RCTC's standards. The newsletter will be prepared in English and Spanish, distributed to stakeholders, and posted to the project website. The publication will be updated on a quarterly basis. Task 2.4: Proiect Website Establish and maintain a project website, following RCTC's standards. The website will include maps and information about construction, stations, project schedule, meeting information and opportunities for feedback about the project. Task 2.5: Proiect Heloline Maintain a toll -free project helpline in English in Spanish to allow callers to ask questions and receive updates about construction activity and public meetings. Calls will be documented in an inquiry log and relayed to the technical team to alert them of concems or other issues. Retum helpline calls within one business day. Task 2.6: Ground -Breaking and Ribbon -Cutting Ceremonies Coordinate ground -breaking and ribbon -cutting ceremonies to mark these project milestones. An overall ground -breaking event will be held for the project, followed by three station grand opening ceremonies and two overall ribbon -cutting P. 16 • 218 ceremonies. Activities will include site selection, logistics, notification, planning the flow of events and speakers, preparing printed programs, staffing, refreshments, photography, equipment rentals and commemorative items. Task 2.7: Construction Alerts Prepare and disseminate Construction Alerts in English and Spanish, using a variety of outreach methods, including email, US mail, website postings, and use of RCTC's Twitter account. Task 2.8: Response/Monitoring of Project Inquiries Respond to, document and resolve project inquiries received via the website, helpline, in person, and during meetings. All inquiries will be documented in a public inquiry log and presented to RCTC and the construction team. Responses to frequent inquiries may be incorporated into the project newsletters. Task 2.9: Organizational Updates Arrange updates to City Councils and Chambers of Commerce for Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Perris, as well as to the UCR Campus Planning Division, prior to the start of construction and on an annual basis. A PowerPoint presentation will be prepared to support these briefings, and the outreach team will schedule the briefings and provide technical support during the presentations. Task 2.10: Business/School/Neighborhood/Commuter Outreach Facilitate outreach to businesses, schools, neighborhoods and commuters via visits to area businesses, UCR, neighborhood groups, and other major stakeholders to relay project information, answer questions, and leam the best way to communicate with these affected parties. Commuters will be reached through construction signage with the project helpline, website, and Twitter account printed on signs. Task 2.11: Team Coordination Participate in team coordination meetings, project kickoff meetings and weekly construction progress meetings to ensure close coordination with RCTC, and the construction team. Develop a database of project stakeholders • Prepare a bi-lingual project fact sheet/newsletter and website • Establish a toll -free project helpline in English and in Spanish Coordinate three public information meetings prior to the start of construction — one each in Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Perris. • Coordinate and participate in weekly construction progress meetings. • Prepare and disseminate traffic advisories in English and Spanish, using a variety of outreach methods, including email, US mail, newspapers and radio updates, and Twitter. • Document inquiries, response and resolution of construction inquiries received via the website, helpline, in P. 17 219 person, and during meetings. • Coordination of project ground -breaking and ribbon -cutting ceremonies. • Update annually the City Councils and Chambers of Commerce for Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Perris, March Air Force Base, as well as UCR Campus Planning Division. • Business/school/neighborhood/commuter outreach. 3. Partnering Conferences Project Manager, Resident Engineer, all technical leads, and key staff will participate in Partnering sessions with members of RCTC, as well as contractors key personnel 4. Coordinate Construction Issues with Local Agencies Coordinate construction issues with local agencies by communicating the PVL schedule, including contractor weekly and monthly updates, and clarifying the construction activities which would be of concern to those agencies, such as weekend closures for work on grade separations, traffic detours and business access. Potential impacts to traffic, public safety, public services, community events, schools, businesses, emergency services, other construction projects, the environment, and other quality of life issues will be discussed ahead of construction. Identified affected local agencies include departments of the City and County of Riverside, the City of Perris, Caltrans, SCRRA, BNSF, and the March Joint Powers Authority. S. Construction Safety and Security The contractor will be responsible for developing their own safety and security plan that is appropriate for the work contemplated along the rail corridor, the city street crossings and the stations. This plan will be submitted to the owner. Review the plan for compliance with the Contract Documents, the RCTC safety plan and expected operations. The contractor is responsible for complying with the safety requirements, and discrepancies will be brought to their attention for appropriate changes. Monitor all operations on the project, document incidents and take appropriate actions to discuss them with the contractor. Accidents will be recorded in daily reports and reports generated by law enforcement or regulatory agencies or the railroad will be collected for the project files 6. Contractor/Subcontractor Lien Releases Track, analyze, and report to RCTC regarding the filing of any Preliminary Lien Notices, Stop Work Notices and Lien Releases by the Project's subcontractors and vendors. Verify that the contract requires the contractor provide RCTC with both "release of lien" documentation and liens filed as work is completed, or the Project nears completion. Stop Work Notices will be addressed at weekly progress meetings to address any issues with lack of payment to subcontractors and vendors. Provide RCTC with a spreadsheet identifying liens and releases. P. 18 220 7. Contractor Insurance The Contractor will provide a list of subcontractors, which the CM will use to determine if insurance and bonding forms have been submitted in conformance with the contract. Provide speck files for tracking these insurance requirements. 8. Labor Compliance and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Monitoring: Verify that documents required are initiated, processed, and maintained. Monitor the contractor's compliance with prevailing wages under state and/or federal laws by providing the following services: • Attend and conduct labor compliance portion of a pre -job -conference. • Provide Prevailing Wage Training Seminar to Prime, subcontractors and staff • Review of certified payrolls submitted by prime and subcontractors. • Review correlation of payrolls and extra work billing. • Review placement of posters by Contractors. • Review submitted data and make recommendations to the Resident Engineer regarding possible deductions due to violations and discrepancies. • Conduct preliminary investigations of apparent violations. • Conduct, review and follow-up on field interviews. This generally will consist of two interviews per trade per month. • Conduct site audits quarterly. • EEO: Monitor goals and timetable for minority and female participation and Conduct preliminary investigations on complaints. B. Project Controls I. Progress Management Utilize the agreed upon electronic document control system to file and manage all correspondence, submittals, shop drawings, permits, costs and other schedule sensitive issues. Should a conflict be identified in the field, identify the conflict and provide recommendations to mitigate said conflict. Discuss with RCTC all changes anticipated by the CM team. Coordinate with the designer of record and RCTC before issuing a change order. Assist with the management of, and communication with, third parties along the alignment, including SCRRA, BNSF, property owners, and outside agencies including the Cities of Perris and Riverside, Riverside County, March Air Force Base, and Moreno Valley. Include the various utility companies that have facilities and/or infrastructure adjacent to or crossing the alignment. P. 19 221 Work with the contractor with the goal of obtaining an approved baseline schedule early in the project. This baseline schedule will provide a platform from which progress and impacts can be measured throughout construction. The CPM schedule monthly updates to the baseline schedule will be reviewed within the timeframes allotted in the contract specifications. Work with the contractor and our staff to identify opportunities to recover the slippage in schedule. Develop a list of required submittals, including shop drawings, from the contract documents and project specifications, and require the contractor to do the same. The two lists will be compared against each other to verify that both parties are in agreement as to the submittal requirements. These will all be managed within the electronic document control system, which will allow generation of reports indicating outstanding submittals and contract documents that require processing. Verify that the contractor includes activities and durations for submittal review and approval for all significant submittals. The activities will be required to be included on the schedule for all significant procurements, especially long -lead items such as grade crossing panels and equipment, communication, and station electrical components. Work with RCTC and the FOR to determine which submittals will be reviewed by which party. Provide RCTC with a Monthly Project Status Report for the project as a whole. Meet with RCTC's Project Manager to agree on the items to be included in this report. Information will include progress reports for major elements of the Project, engineering and contract administration issues, costs expended versus costs projected, an updated contingency balance, contractors progress versus time expended, and schedule updates. Any schedule slippage will be identified, as well as schedule recovery strategies proposed by the contractor. 2. Document Control • Work with RCTC Project Management staff and the FOR in selecting a Document Control System (DCS) that meets the • project needs and is capable of adding any necessary file categories to manage the document flow and contract. FTA and State guidelines will be followed, and agency requirements met Provide consistency of document processing including: • Document I.D.— contract number, date in, source • Subject/File code assignment • Document tracking • Document distribution • Records storage and retrieval Provide training and assistance to all field office staff relative to correct and timely document processing. The document control procedures will be formalized in the Project Procedures Manual. All records will be properly securedin controlled computer storage with appropriate back-up systems. Backup files will be saved electronically and stored offsite. Hard copy files will be kept at the construction office. Documents will be scanned, coded and filed in both the hard copy file as well as electronically.. P. 20 222 • • • Develop a matrix that describes the workflow for all project documents. 3. Progress Payments Unit rate items are measured by the field inspection staff as the work progresses. These field measurements are recorded in the inspector daily reports and on separate Quantity Sheets for each speck Bid Item. Lump sum items, with Schedules of Values, in FTA format, will be tracked against the progress in the field and the individual tasks updated as appropriate. When the Contractor submits its monthly request, the inspectors provide the Quantity Sheets for that period. The inspectors and the office engineers then review the quantities requested by the Contractor against the Quantity Sheets and Schedule of Values. A meeting may occur between the CM staff and the Contractor to discuss any discrepancies between the quantity submitted on the pay request by the Contractor and the CM's Quantity Sheets. The approved monthly progress pay request package will include Quantity Sheets that support the quantities shown for the period and to date. 4. Cost Management Provide cost management through tracking project allocations from the beginning of the project using our Cost to Complete Trend System as described later. Input all current costs, track changes and potential changes and look at the effect each has on the overall budget. Provide the ability to segregate costs, using a unique WBS identification system, to provide RCTC with a summary of relevant costs as well as various funding sources. Cost reports will be provided to support the Monthly Project Status Report and the Quarterly FTA Project Status Reports. 5. Cost Engineering/Estimating Implement a Cost to Complete Trend System that forecasts the known costs (bid items and approved change orders) and potential costs (potential change orders, potential claims, and disputes) of construction through completion of the project. The cost to complete will be updated monthly and included in the monthly progress report to RCTC. Once a change is identified, determine the scope of the change and produce an Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) for the change. The ICE will consist of a detailed estimate of the hours and costs assodated with the materials, labor and equipment for items of work that are affected by the modifications, including markups outlined in the contract documents. For any change that might materially affect the cost basis of an item, generally either 25°% above or below the engineer's estimate, daily reports will be assessed and actual cost of production will be determined in the case of adjustments being warranted. Each potential change order cost is included in the Project Cost to Complete Trend System. 6. Submittals, Non Conformance Reports, and RFIs Review submittals for compliance, quality and completeness before processing them for review by the Engineer of Record (Engineer) or a CM Team member, as appropriate and agreed upon by all parties 60 days prior to construction contract NTP. Copies of specific submittals for review will be provided to RCTC staff as determined during the preconslruction phase. The submittal review process will be tracked and the status report included in the weekly construction meeting. P. 2t 223 • If the contractor is requesting time impacts, a Time Impact Analysis (TIA) will be required to be submitted. Review the TIA for proper logic ties and if warranted, additional time will be granted in the change order and the contractor will update the project schedule to reflect said change. Should the contractor file a notice of potential claim, perform the following 1) Analyze the potential claim and examine the facts of the issue to determine if the claim has merit; 2) Take timely action to respond to the potential claim. Deny RFCs that are determined, in conjunction with RCTC, to have no merit via a detailed response letter to the Contractor outlining why their potential claim does not have merit. Issue a contract change order if the claim has merit. Track the contractors' costs in the field on a time and materials basis for any ongoing work associated with the potential claim to serve as back-up and support for future negotiations and resolution. 3) Prepare an independent cost estimate (ICE) to substantiate the costs of the change order. 4) Increase or decrease quantities of contract items or negotiate a lump sum agreed price with the understanding that proceeding on a time and materials (force account) basis will be the last resort. Prepare a narrative that presents the applicable contract language and a brief background including correspondence, meeting minutes, and RFIs. Examine the facts of the issue and determine if a change from the plans and specifications has occurred. If an issue is found to have merit, the impacts on time and costs are then examined. A rough order of magnitude cost is allocated to each potential claim for inclusion into the project cost to complete the report until an ICE can be completed. 9. Reports and Records Prescribed procedures for contract administration functions and tasks will be implemented for the Perris Valley Line Project, and include the following: Control Loos — Review, log, coordinate and respond to RFI's, RFC's, PCO's, NCR's, NPC's and other project related inquiries. Inquiries will be tracked as they are submitted. Review and research each RFI and provide a recommended response. Should input from design, the RCTC or other agencies be required, coordinate obtaining the necessary responses. Daily Diaries & Photo Control - Keep Caltrans-style daily diaries. Project inspection staff will submit daily diaries documenting construction activities, weather conditions, manpower, equipment and materials used in the work, work status, location and type of work performed, number and classification of trade labor, supervision, quantity and type of materials used, production, and conflicts or conversations that occurred during the day. Additionally each inspector shall keep a daily photographic and video log of work activities. The photographs will be categorized by month, type of work and the individual that took the photo. P. 23 225 Weekly Diaries and Progress Reports - Prepare weekly RE Diaries that will document pertinent conversations with the • contractor and any local agencies or 30 parties. Prepare progress reports detailing the weekly construction progress this will include the progress in time, any weather days or CCO days for the week and financial payments to date. These reports will roll up to the monthly and quarterly reports. Change Documentation - Change Orders will include the scope of the change, what items are being changed, how it is being paid, the percent increase/decrease of the items being changed and if an adjustment is warranted, any schedule impacts, the total cost of the change, and the associated funding splits. Provide a letter of transmittal indicating the scope of the change, why the change is necessary, method of compensation, the total cost of the change, who the change was discussed with and concurred by, if contract time is impacted by the change, funding splits, and the remaining contingency balance. Monthly Reporting - Compile the monthly project costs, including engineering and management costs, change summaries and their effects on contingencies, contract work completed vs. time expended and other pertinent data. The monthly reporting will be formatted such that it will be able to be incorporated into RCTC's quarterly FTA reports. Quarterly FTA reports — Will assist RCTC in preparation of the Quarterly FTA reports. 10. Railroad Force Account Write a speck railroad diary that includes all railroad specific activity. The information includes the normal workday information, weather and location as well as specific documentation of rail road workers, items worked on, flagman for the day, equipment on the job and durations. For Force Account work, this separate daily report or "railroad diary" will be matched with specific invoiced daily reports and activities to corroborate work done and verify the accuracy of charges. C. Quality Assurance 1. Quality Assurance Review the contractor's Quality Control Plan to verify that it meets all requirements of the FTA "Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines, FTA-MA-06-0189-92-1 ", as well as Caltrans-Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), Chapter 16 — Administer Construction Contracts, Section 14 — Quality Assurance Program for FHWA funded local agency projects. 2. Utility Coordination Initial Field Review —Copies of the master list will be distributed by RCTC to all members of the Project Team and filtered copies provided to each agency representative for review/comment. Relocation/Mitigation/Installation Planning • Attend meetings, on an as -needed basis, which will include representatives of each relevant entity as well as the Design/CM team. These meetings will be used to identify specific utilities in need of P. 24 • 226 modification as well as any new facilities required under the project scope or changes. Also, monitor utilities that will not be able to be located until after construction begins. We assumed this to be the case in no more than 10 utility locations. Construction Phase - Once the construction phase commences, assume the lead role in inspecting the relocation of utilities that were not relocated during the pre -construction phase, as well as the mitigation of any unknown utility issues identified during construction. Coordinate between the designer, contractor and utility agencies to develop small-scale workarounds and serve as a liaison between the utility and project design teams should larger mitigation efforts be required. Any unknown utilities will be incorporated into the master list immediately upon discovery. 3. Coordinate Flagging Once the construction contract is underway, the BNSF will relinquish dispatching and control to SCRRA. Meet with the contractor and SCRRA in the beginning of the project to discuss flagging, railroad requirements and make sure both parties know each other and agree on communication protocols for flagging and other issues. For every operation that will be within railroad right of way, a safety briefing will be held immediately prior to beginning work. Require that the contractor's EIC will inform all team members of the expected train traffic, any specific issues for the location and the safety for the day. HDR Team members will check in with the EIC and check out when leaving the project location within railroad right of way. 4. Storm Water Pollution Prevention (SWPPP) The Contractor will be required to deveop, submit for approval, and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project. This submittal will include guidelines for the handling of storm water, how the contractor will control any potential contamination of water leaving the project site and list all Best Management Practices required by the project. These are generally shown on the contract plans and discussed in the contract special provisions. Once the SWPPP plan is approved, the contractor will be required to follow the provisions of the plan for all instances on the project. The contractor will be responsible for implementing the Best Management Practices (BMPs) as shown on the plans and as required by the SWPPP. It is assumed that this project will comply with the Statewide Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ which will take effect on July 1, 2010. Review the project site on an on -going basis to verify that the proper BMPs are being utilized and Rain Event Action Plans are in place. Field inspectors and the Resident Engineer will be responsible for daily monitoring of BMPs and implementation and notifying the contractor of any upkeep, revisions and monitoring of the effectiveness of BMPs installed. 5. Review of Traffic Plans Traffic plans submitted by the Contractor will be reviewed for conformance with any lane closure details and traffic handling requirements provided in the contract documents and for conformance with the applicable standards. Traffic plans will be submitted to the appropriate local agency for review and acceptance prior to the start of construction. Periodically verify that Contractor properly installs and maintains detours and prosecutes the work in the phases shown on the drawings, or as approved. Once a detour has been installed, monitor its effects and assist with resolution of any issues arising from the detour. Provide advance notice to agencies, emergency services, businesses, residents, and the general public prior to P. 25 227 traffic detours and road or lane closures through the public outreach task. 6. Survey Support (QA) Services Verify the accuracy of the contractor's supplemental control points and our surveyors will spot check layouts from those control points. Where layout is critical, such as wall construction along the ROW and bridge piles and abutments, spot check the Contractor's layout as requested by RE. 7. Systems Inspection, Testing, Commissioning, and Start-up P. 26 Work identified in this section will be performed with SCRRA and Designer participation. Commissioning and Startup - Support RCTC with the performance of the following major operations and start-up tasks: • Safety and Security Certification • Integrated Testing • Rail Activation and System Acceptance Systems Inspection and Testing Signal Inspection and Test Witnessing —Monitor inspection, maintenance and installation of railroad crossings, wayside signal, bungalow wiring, traffic signals, remotely operated power switches and cutover testing. Verify the QC measures are followed and submitted. Assist the Engineer of Record in reviewing signal design submittals as required. Coordinate with BNSF and SCRRA and the contractor to verify compliance with the negotiated construction agreements to minimize operational impacts. Monitor and verify that permits are in place, submittals are made and materials procurements are performed to meet the signal installation schedule. Communications Inspection -Monitor inspection, maintenance and installation of communications systems, review the planned systems and make recommendations to the Engineer of Record. Coordinate similarly to the Signal Inspection as outlined above. Monitor, in conjunction with SCRRA, the integration of CCTV into existing SCCRA system. Systems Testing: Coordinate execution of the various systems integration testing activities including the generation and review of testing procedures and reports, track access control and coordination and the organization of personnel and equipment, test witnessing. 228 • • As certifiable items are ready for witnessing, testing or placing into service, identify system items to be verged and - incorporated into the Safety Certification Checklist. Safety and Security Certification - The Perris Valley Project and RCTC, under mandate from the FTA and FRA, is required to implement a System Safety Program Plan (SSPP). One element of the SSPP is a Safety and Security Certification Program (SSCP) to verify that rail projects and major capital projects have been designed and constructed in accordance with safety and security related criteria and specification requirements. Support RCTC with maintaining oversight of the safety and security issues. Assist RCTC in its coordination with the FRA, CPUC and FTA as needed. This oversight will also include identifying safety item requirements for operations, including contractor provided. training, rules and procedures, and emergency drills. Using an electronic and hardcopy filing system, safety and security certification items identified in the documentation review, checklists, and analyses will be logged, tracked and verified. Support RCTC throughout the entire safety and security certification process, culminating in a Final Safety and Security Certification Verification Report that summarizes the readiness of the project for revenue service. Follow the work plan regarding the below twelve major tasks: • Support the Preparation of a Safety and Security Management Plan (SMPP) • Support the preparation of a Safety and Security Certification Program Plan • Develop Master Certifiable Items List (CIL) • Prepare Preliminary Hazard Analysis • Develop Safety/Security File System • Review Testing and Safety Certification Activities • Implementation of the Safety and Security Certification Program • Develop Safety Critical Items List to track open items • Support the preparation of Final Project Safety and Security Certificates Integrated Testing - The construction contractor will be required to submit and adhere to an Integrated Test Plan that will identify the tests required, and the roles, responsibilities, and schedules. Verify that the Plan provides the necessary instructions and prerequisite training for contractors and staff prior to accessing the mainline for testing. Verify the Plan includes the necessary forms and instructions to request track allocation procedures, red tag procedures, vehicle mainline testing, wayside access, and flagman protection. Requirements for this Plan will be clearly spelled out as a contract deliverable in the construction contract documents. Although the contractor will be responsible for developing and implementing the Test Plan, develop a Test Management Oversight Plan which will provide the framework for overseeing and coordinating the contractor's integrated and pre -revenue testing. Provide a Test Oversight Manager who will implement the plan and provide liaison with the contractor. The Test Oversight Manager will also provide coordination with city and traffic engineers to verify grade crossings are adequately protected prior to vehicle testing. P. 27 229 Rail Activation Plan - Prepare a Rail Activation Plan. This Plan will identify and schedule all of the critical rail start- • up tasks and assign responsibility for each of them. Work closely with the FRA to verify tasks are defined and assigned in accordance with their policies and practices. Categorize each activation task under one of the following ten functions: • Staffing • Transportation • Maintenance/Engineering • Training • Safety • Security 8. Materials Testing and Support Services • Finance • Service Integration • Fare Collection • Public Information Provide Quality Assurance (QA) geotechnical and materials testing services for the Perris Valley Line project. Test all materials in accordance with the most current and appropriate ASTM and/or Caltrans Test Methods. Create a table of all materials that require testing. The table will address testing frequencies, generally following the frequencies identified in the Caftans Construction Manual. Daily Field Reports (DFRs)- DFRs will be written by the field materials tester and submitted to the project office. Earthwork Observation and Testing - Provide certified soils technicians for observation and testing of backfill placement, as fill thickness and the earthwork contractor's schedule requires. Foundation Observation - Observe foundation excavations before reinforcing steel is placed, to verify that foundations will bear on and within suitable soil. Concrete Sampling and Testing • Field special and batch plant inspection will be performed by a certified technician, both on site and at a batch plant within 50 miles of this alignment. Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Sampling and Testing - Field special and batch plant inspection will be performed by a certified technician. Materials Laboratory Testing - Perform all materials laboratory testing for this project at the Leighton Caltrans certified Temecula laboratory. Perform geotechnical laboratory testing of representative on -site and imported soils, and aggregate base materials to determine the laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content ("compaction curves"), and corresponding P. 28 • • 230 Di • grain size distribution to match these earth materials with the appropriate compaction curve. Additional geotechnical laboratory testing such as corrosion potential, sand equivalent and/or R-value testing, may also be required. Perform concrete compressive strength and shrinkage testing, and asphalt extraction, gradation and density testing as specified. It is anticipated that the QA effort will be approximately 10-20% of QC testing frequencies, depending on material performance and material risks. Testing frequencies will largely be established as shown in the Caltrans Construction Manual for similar materials. • • Quality Control —Laboratory results are reviewed by a Califomia licensed Civil Engineer before final results are transmitted. In support of all of these field services, provide project management, supervision and internal quality control. 9. As -Built Drawings Coordinate with the Contractor to verify they are keeping up to date and accurate as -built plans and coordinate with the Engineer of Record for any design changes and changed plans. Work with the Engineer of Record to review the final as - built drawings for accuracy. D. Environmental 1. Environmental Services Implement the Construction Environmental Control Plan. Coordinate the monitoring (e.g., biological, cultural, paleontological) that would be required during portions of project construction. Advise the resident engineer on which requirements will need to be included in the contractor's schedule. Verify that key team players are aware of environmental constraints and any schedule implications for sensitive environmental resources. TASK 1 Construction Monitoring Task 1.1 Biological Resource (During Construction) Task 1.1.1 Biological Construction Monitoring through project durations Per mitigation measure (BR-5) of the Draft EIR, biological construction monitors will be available to monitor all areas required. This scope assumes that when work is conducted in environmentally sensitive areas (ESA), the monitor will be onsite 5 days per week. If substantial construction activity is planned for the project site within/adjacent to ESA areas, there may be a need for up to one additional monitor. If an additional monitor is perceived necessary between HDR and RCTC, a cost amendment would be required.- For work irrnon- environmental sensitive areas, a monitor will be onsite approximately 3 days per week. Each monitoring day is assumed to be 10 hours to allow for monitoring a full construction day and providing the necessary travel and reporting throughout the site. We have budgeted a total of 2,500 biological monitoring hours for this cost estimate. Please see the attached budget spreadsheet for the cost to conduct the biological monitoring preconstruction survey. P.29 231 P. 30 The Draft EIR (ES.4.0) identifies that construction would occur outside the bird breeding season for the southwestem willow flycatcher, least Bell's vireo, and Califomia gnatcatcher. If project construction is proposed during the breeding season, near suitable habitat for these species and surveys per U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service protocol are required, an amended scope of work would be required to perform this work. In addition, noise monitoring at nest locations would require an amended scope of work prior to initiating the additional work. Task 1.1.2Spadefoot Toad Preconstruction survey Spade foot toads are only apparent during a small window of 4-8 weeks every year. Surveys for the two sites (San Jacinto River Bridge and Overflow Channel Bridge areas) where they may occur are recommended to be done at the time of year when the toads may be visible rather than the 30 days before construction. Surveying at other times of year will not be effective. Surveys will be conducted by a qualified biologist a survey report prepared. Please see the attached budget spreadsheet for the cost to conduct the preconstruction survey. At the time this scope of work was prepared, the project is in the Draft EIR stage and the specific mitigation plan has not yet been prepared and it is uncertain how many spade foot toads (if any) exist in the project area. Typically mitigation for toads requires exclusion fencing around the project area and daily monitoring to ensure toads are not entering the area, the exclusion fencing is intact, and removing any found in the project area. HDR has included an additional 100 biologist hours (beyond those identified for the survey above) to support spade foot toad mitigation efforts as needed. If additional mitigation support beyond the 100 hours is needed, an amended scope of work would be needed prior to initiating the addition mitigation support. Task 1.2 Cultural Resources (During Construction) Task 1.2.1 Archaeological Monitoring — Bedrock Milling Site (Between MP 3.50 and 4.50) Under this task, conduct archaeological monitoring between MP 3.50 and 4.50. The monitor will be present during all construction activities in this area, per the mitigation measure (CR-1) identified in the Draft EIR (April 5, 2010). We have assumed up to 10 hours per day for the monitor. This would include monitoring as well as monitoring report preparation. As required in CR-1 in the PVL DEIR, "archaeological monitors will have the authority to temporarily halt or diverl construction equipment to examine potential resources, assess significance, and offer recommendations for the procedures deemed appropriate to either further investigate or mitigate any adverse impacts." Cultural resource discoveries will first be reported to Project Manager who will determine, in conjunction with the monitor, the degree to which the discovery should be assessed. General monitoring methods consist of taking daily field notes and documenting daily construction activities. Provide weekly progress reports. All archaeological monitors will have passed the appropriate rail safety training. Please see note #1, at end of scope, regarding procedures in the event that archaeological resources are identified on the project site. Task 1.2.2 Archaeological Monitoring • Bedrock Milling Site (Between MP 5.60 and 6.50) , Under this task, conduct archaeological monitoring between MP 5.60 and 6.50. The monitor will be present during all construction activities in this area, per the mitigation measure (CR-2) identified in the Draft EIR (April 5, 2010). We have assumed up to 10 hours per day for the monitor. This would include monitoring as well as monitoring report preparation. As required in CR-2 in the Draft EIR "archaeological monitors will have the authority to 232 • temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to examine potential resources, assess significance, and offer recommendations for the procedures deemed appropriate to either further investigate or mitigate any adverse impacts.' Cultural resource discoveries will first be reported to the Project Manager who will determine, in conjunction with the monitor, the degree to which the discovery should be assessed. General monitoring methods consist of taking daily field notes and documenting daily construction activities. The Project Manager will provide weekly progress reports. All archaeological monitors will have passed the appropriate rail safety training. Please see note #1, at end of scope, regarding procedures in the event that archaeological resources are identified on the project site. Task 1.2.3 Paleontological Monitoring Under this task, staff from the San Diego Natural History Museum will conduct paleontological monitoring on the project site per the requirements of mitigation measures CR-3 identified in the Draft EIR (April 5, 2010). HDR has assumed 140 man -days (10 hour per day) for a total of 1,400 hours of paleontological monitoring. Since project construction may occur in different areas simultaneously, there may be instances where two monitors are required. An amended scope of work would be needed prior to initiating the additional monitoring effort. The mitigation measure notes that paleontological monitoring is required for all areas of the project site where grading of depths of more than 4 feet will be required, with the exception of the following, which will require monitoring regardless of depth: 1) Monitoring construction associated with the Citrus Connection, South Perris Station and Layover Facility and 2) if Palmyrita or Columbia station option are selected, construction will be monitored. All paleontological monitors will have passed the appropriate rail safety training. Please see note #1, at end of scope, regarding procedures in the event that paleontological resources are identified on the project site. Construction within the San Jacinto River will be monitored to verify that the work is done in compliance with the jurisdictional impact area conditions. If habitat removal is to occur within the nesting season, restrictions as outlined in the MBTA will be monitored by the project biologist. Verify adherence to environmental and encroachment permits'. Permitting requirements will be a line item to be discussed at the weekly progress meeting between the CM team and the contractor. Our Environmental staff will assist the RE if needed on any environmental issues outlined in the environmental control plan as well as new issues that present themselves in the field. Air quality, Storm Water Pollution Prevention, noise regulations and hazardous materials locations will be periodically reviewed and monitored to verify compliance by the contractor with the various laws and requirements as set forth in the special provisions and any permits required for the project. Phase 2 A: Post Construction Phase Services 1. Contract Closeout These activities will include the following steps: • Verification of work completion for each respective contract. P. 31 233 • Final payment processing. • Resolution of open change orders. Forwarding of executed change orders to storage. • Review final inspection, certification, and warranty documentation. Transfer of documents and records to storage. • Review of as-builts and transfer of as -built contract drawings for storage and protection. • Review 0&M Manuals • Review of final DBE/EEO documentation for compliance. • Review of payroll certification records. • Resolution of liens. Forwarding of lien releases to storage. • Liquidated damages assessment. • Backcharge(s) resolution. • Confirm third -party acceptance, if required. 2. Warranties: Monitor and Track Warranties Include warranty and guarantee procedures in the final version of RCTC's Construction Management Procedures Manual. Metrolink and BNSF requirements must be clearly considered in future warranty monitoring. These procedures are generally as follows: • For warranties and guarantees, when work is formally accepted, advise the contractor in writing of the start of the warranty, period, the effective end date of the warranty period and the status of retention release dependent on the warranted work. 3. Plant Establishment Monitor contractor efforts for the plant establishment throughout the project including intermittent inspection of plants and verifying that irrigation systems work properly and that all plants are established or replaced. 4. Turn Over to RCTC & SCRRA Prepare all project documentation, files, electronic files, brochures, materials records, and final as -built plans from contractor, warranties and manuals for turn over to RCTC and SCRRA as needed. This would include punchlist final walkthrough. Coordinate Station Tum Over to RCTC. P. 32 234 • • EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF SERVICES Exhibit B 235 • • 1. Pre -Construction Start August 2010 a. CM Manual 10 Weeks after Receipt of Design Documents b. Constructability Review 4 weeks after Receipt of Design Documents c. QA/QC Plan 16 weeks after Receipt of Design Documents d. Utility Relocation Inspection start within 4 weeks of start 2. Construction Start April 1, 2011 a. Bid Assistance May 1, 2011 b. Construction Inspection start May 1, 2011 c. Train Testing and Start Up May 30, 2012 d. Revenue Service December 2012 3. Post Construction Start November 2012 a. Project As -Built plans April 30, 2013 b. Hand over all Documents April 30, 2013 237 • EXHIBIT "C" PART COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT PART II APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS AND APPROVED BILLING RATES Exhibit C 239 EXHIBIT "C" PART 1 COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT For the satisfactory performance and completion of the Services under this Agreement, the Commission will pay the Consultant compensation as set forth herein. 1) ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION. Compensation for the Services will be comprised of the following elements: 1.1 Direct Labor Costs; 1.2 Fixed Fee; and 1.3 Additional Direct Costs. a) DIRECT LABOR COSTS. Direct Labor costs shall be paid in an amount equal to the product of the Direct Salary Costs and the Multiplier which are defined as follows: i) DIRECT SALARY COSTS Direct Salary Costs are the base salaries and wages actually paid to the Consultant's personnel directly engaged in performance of the Services under the Agreement. (The range of hourly rates paid to the Consultant's personnel appears in Section 2 below.) ii) MULTIPLIER * The Office and (Field) Multipliers to be applied to the Direct Salary Costs to determine the Direct Labor Costs is 1.4909 Office & 1.3534 Field respectively, and are the sum of the following components: (1) Direct Salary Costs (2) Payroll Additives 1.00 .4909 Office .3534 Field The decimal ratio of Payroll Additives to Direct Salary Costs. Payroll Additives include all employee benefits, allowances for vacation, sick leave, and holidays, and company portion of employee insurance and social and retirement benefits, all federal and state payroll taxes, premiums for insurance which are measured by payroll costs, and other contributions and benefits imposed by applicable laws and regulations. Exhibit C-1 241 (3) Overhead Costs 1.1860 Office & .9688 Field The decimal ratio of allowable Overhead Costs to the Consultant firm's tota� direct salary costs. Allowable Overhead Costs include general, administrative and overhead costs of maintaining and operating established offices, and consistent with established firm policies, and as defined in the Federal Acquisitions Regulations, Part 31.2. (4) Profit 8% 1.1.2.4 Multiplier 2.8911 Office & 2.5080 Field (Sum of 1.1.2.1, 1.1.2.2, and 1.1.2.3) * The Payroll Additives and Overhead Costs, as those terms are defined above, shall be adjusted annually to equal Consultant's audited overhead costs for the preceding year. The adjustment shall occur when Consultant has published its audited overhead rate and shall apply to Direct Salary Cost, as defined above, incurred thereafter until the rate for the following year is available upon completion of an independent audit of Consultant's indirect cost rate. b) FIXED FEE. A Fixed Fee of $1,077,897.00 shall be paid to Consultant for Consultant's complete and satisfactory performance of this Agreement and all Services required hereunder. Commission shall pay the Fixed Fee in monthly installments based upon the• percentage of the Services completed at the end of each billing period, as determined in the sole discretion of the Commission's Representative, or his or her designee. Consultant shall not be entitled to and shall forfeit any portion of the Fixed Fee not earned as provided herein. c) ADDITIONAL DIRECT COSTS. Additional Direct Costs directly identifiable to the performance of the services of this Agreement shall be reimbursed at the rates below, or at actual invoiced cost. Exhibit C-2 242 • • Rates for identified Additional Direct Costs are as follows: ITEM REIMBURSEMENT RATE Sub Consultant Mark Up Per Diem Car mileage Rental Car Travel • Hotel • Meals Vehicles Photocopies (Black & White) Photocopies (Color) Photographs/ other reprographic Services Postage/Shipping Courier Service Other Rentals, supplies, purchases $327,438.00 Actual Cost 0.50 or current IRS rate Actual Cost Actual Cost $150/per night $30/per day $1400/per month maximum Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Travel by air and travel in excess of 100 miles from the the Commission's office must have the Commission's reimbursed under this Agreement. 2) DIRECT SALARY RATES Consultant's office nearest to prior written approval to be Direct Salary Rates, which are the range of hourly rates to be used in determining Direct Salary Costs in Section 1.1.1 above, are given below and are subject to the following: a) Direct Salary Rates shall be applicable to both straight time and overtime work, unless payment of a premium for overtime work is required by law, regulation or craft agreement, or is otherwise specified in this Agreement. In such event, the premium portion of Direct Salary Costs will not be subject to the Multiplier defined in Paragraph 1.1.2 above. Direct Salary Rates shown herein are in effect for one year following the effective date of the Agreement. Thereafter, they may be adjusted annually to reflect the Consultant's adjustments to individual compensation. The Consultant shall notify the Commission in writing prior to a change in the range of rates included herein, and prior to each subsequent change. Exhibit C-3 243 HDR CCC FIELD RATES: POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION Project Director Structure Specialist/Proj Advisor Signal Preemption Coordinator Resident Engineer Inspector Admin Assistant/Field Office Mgr Admin Assistant — Office RANGE OF RAW HOURLY RATES $111.11 - $133.33/hour $83.81 - $100.57/hour $75.00 - $90.00/hour $68.00 — 81.60/hour $46.76 - $90.00/hour $30.00 - $36.00/hour $23.77 - $28.52/hour c) The above rates are for the Consultant only. All rates for subconsultants to the Consultant will be in accordance with the Consultant's cost proposal. 3) INVOICING. a) Each month the Consultant shall submit an invoice for Services performed during the preceding month. The original invoice shall be submitted to the Commission's Executive Director with two (2) copies to the Commission's Project Coordinator. b) Charges shall be billed in accordance with the terms and rates included herein, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Commission's Representative. c) Base Work shall be charged separately, and the charges for each task and Milestone listed in the Scope of Services, shall be listed separately. The charges for each individual assigned by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be listed separately onisk an attachment to the invoice. d) A charge of $500 or more for any one item of Additional Direct Costs shall be accompanied by substantiating documentation satisfactory to the Commission such as invoices, telephone logs, etc. Consultant shall maintain files and documentation, for auditing purposes, substantiating all Additional Direct Costs charged to the Commission. Each copy of each invoice shall be accompanied by a Monthly Progress Report and spreadsheets showing hours expended by task for each month and total project to date. Each invoice shall indicate payments to DBE subconsultants or supplies by dollar amount and as a percentage of the total invoice. Each invoice shall include a certification signed by the Consultant's Representative or an officer of the firm which reads as follows: I hereby certify that the hours and salary rates charged in this invoice are the actual hours and rates worked and paid to the employees listed. Signed Title Date Invoice No. Exhibit C-4 244 • 4) PAYMENT a) The Commission shalt pay the Consultant within four to six weeks after receipt by the Commission of an original invoice. Should the Commission contest any portion of an invoice, that portion shall be held for resolution, without interest, but the uncontested balance shall be paid. b) The final payment for Services under this Agreement will be made only after the Consultant has executed a Release and Certificate of Final Payment. 5) SAVINGS BONUS Definitions "Savings Bonus" shall mean compensation to be provided to Consultant, in additional to any other compensation under this Agreement, for Actual Savings realized by the Commission, in an amount not to exceed $1,600,000 (approximately 10% of total fee per phase, $200,000 in Phase 1, $1,300,000 in Phase 2 and $100,000 in Phase 3). "Phase of Work" for this agreement shall mean Pre -Construction, Construction, and Post Construction. "Actual Cost" shall mean the actual cost of providing the Services, as determined at completion of Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 less Other Direct Costs. The Actual Cost shall be calculated following submission of the final invoice for each of the phases by Consultant and final acceptances of each phase's Services by Commission. "Actual Savings" shall mean the savings achieved by Consultant as determined at the completion of each phase based on the Metrics. "Metrics" shall mean the set of metrics to be mutually established and agreed upon by the Parties within ninety (90) days of the effective date of this Agreement to be used in determining the Actual Savings. The Metrics, if established as set forth herein and approved in writing by the Commission's Executive Director, shall be incorporated into the terms and this Section 5 as though fully set forth herein. The Commission desires to encourage and regard Consultant for Project delivery that is of excellent quality and also timely, efficient and economical. In addition to any other compensation provided for in this Agreement, Consultant shall be entitled to a Savings Bonus equal to twenty five percent (25%) of Actual Savings realized by the Commission, up to the not to exceed amount shown above for each phase. If the Parties are unable to successfully establish the Metrics, the Parties agree that Consultant shall not be entitled to any Savings Bonus. If the Metrics are adopted, the Commission may adjust this Savings Bonus program, pursuant to a written amendment, as required to equitably account for changes in work assigned to the Consultant. Exhibit C-5 245 The Consultant acknowledges that it is under a pre-existing legal obligation to deliver the Project at the lowest cost to the Commission. The Savings Bonus is being offered as an• incentive to Consultant. Any dispute arising out of the administration, calculation or meaning of this Section 5 shall be resolved at the sole discretion of the Executive Director. The exclusive remedy for any claim under this Section 5 shall be a written appeal to the Commission, and such claim shall not be subject to litigation or any other remedy either at law or in equity. Exhibit C-6 246 EXHIBIT "C' PART 2 APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS AND APPROVED BILLING RATES HDR Engineering, Inc. Office Rates POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION MULTIPLIER SUBJECT TO (enter "x") RANGE OF DIRECT SALARY RATES g 2 3 - ; >.v E. a. y O U r H °: 1 2 - 0. ToG F1 m PrOTemium PrevailWageing $/ Hr $/ Hr Systems Management Lead 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $104.57 $125.48 Vehicle Specialist 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 103.41 124.10 QA Manager 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 92.04 $110.48 PM Manager 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 88.25 $105.90 Railroad Agreement Advisor 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $82.50 $99.00 Transit Advisor 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $81.89 $98.27 Rail Operations Specialist 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $72.80 $87.36 Positive Training Control Advisor 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $70.00 $84.00 Sr. Signals Engineer 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $67.66 $81.19 Funding Specialist 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $67.25 $80.70 Estimator 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $60.56 $86.85 CPUC Specialist 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 .2.8911 $54.50 $65.40 Inspector 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 x $48.30 $57.96 Track Reviewer 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $44.51 $131.67 Accountant 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $44.47 $53.36 Structural Engineer 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $43.86 $67.20 Communications Engineer 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $36.54 $43.85 Reviewer 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $36.49 $102.56 Systems EIT 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $33.30 $39.96 Safety Oversight 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $33.00 $41.04 Project Coordinator/Admin 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $24.00 $38.92 Biologist 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $21.03 $67.31 Environmental Lead 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $48 95 $86.54 Environmental Planner 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $35.00 $42.00 Exhibit C 7 247 HDR Engineering, Inc. (continued) Nor MULTIPLIER RANGE OF POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION o _ , °-' .P: m a SUBJECT TO (enter "x") DIRECT SALARY RATES 1ti W G .� m v a ¢ = o O U Y o i- m aim u. ¢ r o i- � OT premium Prevailing Wage $ / Hr $ / Hr Environmental Document Prep 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $30.45 $36.54 Environmental GIS Analyst 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $27.83 $33.39 Environmental Analyst 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $21.92 $26.30 Cultural/Paleo 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 Principle Investigator 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $43.33 $52.00 Manager 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $33.36 $40.03 Cultural Coordinator 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $32.03 $38.43 Project Archaeologist 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $29.83 $35.79 Paleo Monitor 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $20.00 $24.00 Cultural Monitor 1.0 0.4909 1.186 2.6769 .08 2.8911 $19.00 $24.00 • ARCADIS MULTIPLIER SUBJECT TO RANGE OF POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION - o a (enter "x") DIRECT SALARY RATES 3 _1 a. a O ig U r a ¢ 4-8 M OT Premium Prevailing Wage $ / Hr $ / Hr Project Controls Manager 1.0 0.7261 0.5782 2.3043 .08 2.4886 58.89 60.07 Senior Scheduler 1.0 0.7261 0.9740 2.7001 .08 2.9161 54.48 55.57 Claims Mitigation 1.0 0.7261 0.9740 2.7001 .08 2.9161 62.78 64.04 Claims Analysis 1.0 0.7261 0.9740 2.7001 .08 2.9161 75.44 76.95 Arellano Associates POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION MULTIPLIER SUBJECT TO (enter "x") RANGE OF DIRECT SALARY RATES G � d a a s y O U F a 2 � I. Fm .2 OTPremium WaPrevageiling $/ Hr $/ Hr Outreach Manager 1.0 N/A 0.6 1.6 .08 1.7280 90.00 91.80 Outreach Specialist 1.0 N/A 0.6 1.6 .08 1.7280 61.00 62.22 1 Exhibit C 7 248 Outreach Specialist 1.0 N/A 0.6 1.6 .08 1.7280 51.00 52.02 Note 1: Payroll additives included in overhead costs. C- David Evans and Associates, Inc. POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION MULTIPLIER SUBJECT TO (enter "x") RANGE OF DIRECT SALARY RATES ` a i7 3 _ mo - - a a y O U r P. :: LL ¢ d T° a H m PremiZi um PrevailWageing $ / Hr $ / Hr Survey Manager 1.0 0.6551 1.2424 2.8975 .08 3.1293 $80.00 $90.00 PLS/Survey Analyst 1.0 0.6551 1.2424 2.8975 .08 3.1293 $42.00 $52.00 PLS Party Chief 1.0 0.6551 1.2424 2.8975 .08 3.1293 x x $45.56 $49.56 Chainman 1.0 0.6551 1.2424 2.8975 .08 3.1293 x x $39.73 $43.73 Survey Admin/Clerical 1.0 0.6551 1.2424 2.8975 .08 3.1293 x $25.00 $30.00 Ghirardelli Associates POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION MULTIPLIER SUBJECT TO (enter "x") RANGE OF DIRECT SALARY RATES 1-)8 a D 3 a o � ). v a a E ° = O o 12 e 12 u_ 0 Q c 12 3 OT Premium Prevailing Wage $ / Hr $ / Hr Office Engineer 1.0 0.83 0.48 2.31 .08 2.4948 48.00 60.00 Gonzalez -White Consu ting Services POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION MULTIPLIER SUBJECT TO (enter "x") RANGE OF DIRECT SALARY RATES c o 3 _ d o -' a s „ O U y F u- ¢ d *a E OT Premium Prevailing Wage $/ Hr $ /Nr Labor Compliance Officer 1.0 Small Strs.ness no audited rate 1.7068 .08 1.8433 45.00 45.90 Note 1: Rate includes costs for mileage, photocopying, postage and shipping. Griego and Associates POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION MULTIPLIER SUBJECT TO (enter "x") RANGE OF DIRECT SALARY RATES ° $ a 3 - m �.s a s O U T. 12 tv 4 ri a v 42 a F OT Premium Prevailing Wage $/ Hr $/ Hr Commissioning/Start-up Manager 1.0 Small Business - No Audited Rate 1.3374 .08 1.4444 90.00 115.00 Safety/Security Certification Manager 1 D Small Business- No Audited Rate 1.7196 .08 1.8572 70.00 92.00 Exhibit C 7 249 Systems Testing and Activation Manager 1 0 Small Business - No Audited Rate 1.6049 .08 1.7333 75.00 110.00 C- Leighton Consulting, Inc. POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION MULTIPLIER SUBJECT TO (enter "x") RANGE OF DIRECT SALARY RATES d 2 a 3 a. -a a s y O U 14 H 0!4 a¢ 0Ti. pe Ti um Premi PrevailingWage $/ Hr $/ Hr Senior Principal (PE, GE, REA I) 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 .08 3.0596 85.34 95.99 Principal Geologist (PG, CEG) 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 .08 3.0596 74.64 83.96 Geologist 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 .08 3.0596 52.88 59.48 Geotechnical Project Manager (GE) 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 OS 3.0596 49.50 55.68 Associate Geologist (PG) 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 .08 3.0596 46.34 52.13 Senior Project Scientist 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 OS 3.0596 33.32 37.48 Staff Geologist/Scientist 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 .08 3.0596 25.96 29.20 Administrative 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 .08 3.0596 X 20.18 22.70 Prevailing Wage Group I (soillasphalt) 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 .08 3.0596 X X 42.21 46.81 Prevailing Wage Group II (concrete/masonry) 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 .08 3.0596 X X 43.99 48.59 ! Prevailing Wage Group II (CWI/bolting) 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 .08 3.0596 X X 43.99 48.59 Prevailing Wage Group III (NDT) 1.0 0.284 1.549 2.833 .08 3.0596 X X 45.99 50.59 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING (2010/2011 Rates) POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION MULTIPLIER SUBJECT TO (enter "x") RANGE OF DIRECT SALARY RATES e o d m a 3 o - m i5 a ¢ "' = o O U o 12 a°'i LL =. _. o 1- OT Premium Prevailing Wage $ / Hr $ / Hr Project Manager 1.0 N/A 1.5256 2.5256 08 2.7276 69.67 92.86 Assistant R.E. 1.0 N/A 1.5256 2.5256 08 2.7276 x , 46.34 62.06 Safety/Rail Coordinator 1.0 N/A 1.5256 2.5256 .08 2.7276 x x 50.00 60.00 Inspector (Prey. Wage) 1.0 N/A 1.5256 2.5256 .08 2.7276 x x 47.44 55.90 Doc. Control / Admin. 1.0 N/A 1.5256 2.5256 08 2.7276 x 27.58 35.23 Note 1: Payroll additives included in overhead costs. Note 2: Prevailing wage rates based on California DIR Prevailing Wage Determination SC-23-63-2-2009-1D. Exhibit C 7 250 • C- Xorail, Inc. POSITION OR CLASSIFICATION MULTIPLIER SUBJECT TO (enter "x") RANGE OF DIRERAT S CT SALARY o 0 C 2, 0 a2 ¢ 4a O U H LL ¢ i°- OT Premium Prevailing Wage $ / Hf $1 Hr Lead Systems Engineer 1.0 N/A 1.2064 2.2064 .08 2.3829 72.12 96.16 Signalization Principle Inspector 1.0 N/A 1.2064 2'2064 OS 2.3829 43.27 62.50 Communication Inspector 1.0 N/A 1.2064 2'2064 .08 2.3829 43.27 62.50 Test Engineer 1.0 N/A 1.2064 2'2064 .08 2.3829 43.27 62.50 Test Technician 1.0 N/A 1.2064 2'2064 .08 2.3829 24.04 38.47 Signal Design Engineer 1.0 N/A 1.2064 2.2064 .08 2.3829 38.47 52.89 Sr. Signal Engineer 1.0 N/A 1.2064 2.2064 .08 2.3829 48.08 72.12 CAD Technician 1.0 N/A 1.2064 2.2064 .08 2.3829 X 18.00 38.47 Project Manager 1.0 N/A 1.2064 2'2664 .08 2.3829 43.27 62.50 Administrative Assistant 1.0 N/A 1.2064 2'20M .08 2.3829 X 18.00 38.47 • Note 1: Payroll additives included in overhead costs. ITEM Per Diem Vehicle Car mileage Rental Car Travel • Hotel • Meals Photocopies (Black & White) Photocopies (Color) Photographs/other reprographic Services Postage/Shipping Courier Service Other Rentals, supplies, purchases Advertising Graphic Design Services Translation Services Sub -Consultant Reimbursable Other Direct Costs REIMBURSEMENT RATE Actual Cost $1,400 max per month 0.50 or current IRS rate Actual Cost $150/per night $30/per night Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Exhibit C 7 251 Toll -Free Helpline Services Actual Cost Agency Fees (recording fee, etc) Actual Cost Mobile Laser Scanning Equipment (TITAN) $15,000.00 per day C- Sub-Consultant Reimbursable Other Direct Costs (continued) ITEM Nuclear density gauge Photo -Ionization Detector (PID) Standard Block Weld Test CONCRETE, MASONRY & ASPHALT LAB TESTING Pick-up and Delivery of Test Specimens Concrete Cylinders Compressive Strength (ASTM C 39) Mix Design, Review of Existing Data -Concrete, Asphalt Asphalt Concrete Maximum Density — Hveem Mortar Cylinders (2 by 4 inches) Grout Prisms (3 by 6 inches) CMU Grouted Prisms (Comp Test < 8 by 8 by 16) Bolt Tensile Test Bolt, Nut or Washer Hardness Test Rebar Tensile Strength, <_No. 10 Bars Rebar Bend Test, <_No. 8 Bars SOIL & AGGREGATE LAB TESTING Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture ASTM D1557-07 Sand Equivalent (SE) R-value Sieve Analysis D 422 Expansion Index (El) Corrosion Testing (pH, resistivity soluble sulfate & chloride) REIMBURSEMENT RATE $88.00 per day $200.00 per day Actual Cost $ 80.00 per trip $ 25.00 per each $150.00 per each $125.00 per each $ 25.00 per each $ 25.00 per each $180.00 per each $ 50.00 per each $ 50.00 per each $ 45.00 per each $ 45.00 per each $220.00 per each $105.00 per each $310.00 per each $110.00 per each $131.00 per each $245.00 per each Other Direct Cost Permitted under the FAR and not listed above are reimbursed at Cost Travel by air and travel in excess of 100 miles from the Consultant's office nearest to the Commission's office must have the Commission's prior written approval to be reimbursed under this Agreement. Exhibit C 7 252 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - RFO No. 10-12 058 00 DOLLAR COSTWILLLONLY HDR CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION DISPLAY AT END OF EACH - • PERRIS VALLEY LINE METROLINK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Project Start 1-Aug-104A ROW, NOT UNDER EACH COST PROPOSAL for HOURLY ENTRY, TOTAL TASK COST Construction Management Services, Materials Testing, and Construction Surveying SUMMARY Project End: 30: r33 July 2, 2010 Duration (months): 33 EFFECTIVE DATES OF LABOR RATES »» _ August 1, 2010 to April 30, 2013 TOTAL COST SUMMARY LABOR/EXPENSE ALLOCATION BY Phase FIRM HDR-CCC HDR-ENGR SIMON WONG ARCADIS ARELLANO DAVID EVANS - oaw rwdm GONZALEZ- WHITE GRIECO LEIGHTON XO RAIL Total Total HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS Labor Labor Travel E Direct Grant Total - _ COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS Hours Dollars Expenses Pre - Construction Phase - 3208 2,846 3,49@ 960 294 424 168 - 104 436 294 984 13217 $ 2.132,088 . $ 554212 $ 397,949 $ 538,581 $ 148,122 $ 38,463 $ 126,609 $ 21,555 $ 8,720 -$ 57,179 $ 52,180 $ 188,518 Xorail Labor $ 188518 $ 134,915 5 2267003 ODOs pp 'her $,. 56.380 `` $,. 17,8660 ^�, $- 23950 •,.7.: .. $ 4704 $ 18,550 $ .. T,000 .5 .. $ ,$ 1150 $ 9,625 $ 300 = Subs OlLabor= $ HDR5%FEE $ 9,426 y Jy dia, 5n:r - r 1 'e3 `�^ C�,.. u' {. •f'.0 T�n%�-f°, YXr • .3 3 Z E, y 1 -�-ryy . ;,�k�yik, �f ..:+"' f.,"", 991,409 HDR3%FEE $ 29,742 3' ,f ai.: a %rf'f rt b., . , ..:: ..- _ ..;.... ... ... ': -.. - $ - TOTAL PHASE $ 2,306,171 Constl71Ct1OR,P11aj ;; ... .. .. .. . '- 2273a „5,934„ ,` : x3A2$ , 4,492 1,197 ': 940 - �31102 . ' 712 5.080 5:720 - - 10,395- 83,423 $ 11,642.607 $ 867,193 3208174 $ 451,511 3366,852 710,127 144,046 331206 413,844 60,919 , .:'. 684,004 817,619 1,454,305 Xorail Labor. $ 1,454,305 HDR5%FEE $ 12,509,801 b z �;EaE� -- 244625 't. . ' 7.100 .:. .60$ S 33.140 $ 41950 _ $ _ 8, , e - $ -. $. $ . -. 29.900 $'.. ' 216,940, $ - 41,538 Ober Subs labor. $ 6.528.617 3 72,715 ,.,, ,• 1 •:._, +-y 'i-L''�"" Sit �` T'#r2' Y", �-i n,S '+' 'hfi S `� �' .r .nos' `'r 1Yi i�' "A[t 'IE-Y{'TJSr ,r£, ^vvt^'4 3 HDR3%FEE $ t• :. .•. .. 3y" .{?`." -X 4N.'. k g4 9'.�+y i _ .. P�,;; ° :.. Z.h3� tFJ t es'+ 5,165 $ 776,915 $ 40,361 $ 817,276 iL. -n-•x«e- <': a`•+°+s r 153A22 121,826 45628 77077 4.633 103.331 2635 48986 Xor4il latxtra $ 48.986 MDR :' v .a+ (- �^ #�-+.4"•e. c ..iya,-y-4i,yam Y3c:5Tfi`�STF YFi3l�� a �.h s c�"e 't 4 :�, *'=z ez�s+ ,� •c sli •'�'L }s g�Y { Y , 5: - Other sibs $ 2, 449 ,.i°.€ '�,.j �' �N°s ,L. i- Labor $ 574 7 HDR 3 %FEE - ; 7 .s`- :.._ k i f + .. - j r..�K- ,'. 1.€. +r .90 ¢... ��� �.e.. $ 17 47 -..; x w .ram,. �'I'� -:._ m....,., '^BM=3 "tx:,.n.� _,.a1E. .,. xa¢.,„c:', :]ems -. ;r•'+'� ?',SG` .,.. } .. a+�:ta rt-' 6 , ... :�::, ••-z'-. ''`... .+ .a`n2'`.,s.+. ,..,, ^e. tv7.i�r„`i �S-=.t".+.'IkN'r ru, �� .. -:u:C '1�'1 'tiiri S'W MiiMiSBNES- $ - TOTAL PHASE $ 836,973 gFm,.,y P 1� a •$1 •. .04-Mg _��a I0ICib X447{Ail:_, Total Hours Total Labor Total ODC's Totals 1e't780',-v�'•g(1g4"' y,r t" ,S,>�T2i r r - Hi99t .•"r� y ..L ._ f , <-�, , it S` :. ��,. 6plf"2' � 11.739: . 101,805 14,551,610 1,042,469 TOTAL LABOR COSTS R { $ 3 15,403 $ 843460 $ 4125 ;= $ 980,076 $ 1 509 $ 503 $ 51 477 $ 74472 ,':'G;280, $ 844,514 $ 872434 $ 1 91 ,: Xorail Labor $ $ 1691,8013 $ HDR5%FEE $ 15,599,080 s 'E� v'11` p.,•`ry�t£iY n Fr%X 1�,. °1F `eY'.;lx °A 'u °°y 1 -.. `.` :. 2 r"�.a. #•4 .. '. :.: r, Cr Subs $ 84590 ': M h• r+ ,. 1E0,'S4Ds °x'+f4+S6, ).`1'C•''rS`-. �,.. :"k^a"• f•$''38t91'S S R Tom. S ::�4k046: Labor= $ $ HDR3%FEE $ 242,848 t ys, ,r. ,. F ^ij .+' e!s ' - - P 5•,i .1�p s,+( s$. a t=r + 1 4-''a'4.. �i£ 2 e$ � JrYA 44X�1u s' . �$ '88:1,429 $. 1; 01190 $� 'Iji35,018 ,094,933 SUBTOTAL $ 15,921,s1s 3 -. .T, ri. :L- f> -ram -h,-.. ^4?,,•Y'P s ^Y=3, Railroad Liability Maur - SY R r a =taf } :� rx-+�� s$ rxn sz. ate- TOTAL PROPOSAL 15,950,146 SI ry i'a�`�•" a �,„�:5 ,. x�y '`"�s."`,7,' x+` y tK .„ ^2t - S i 1 ''t.t�1i. � ,+1"i d� -•a. � '-.. l.F. . N ' ..- .. a .'.. SPY � "�`'+° .� t r Y - w ( ° %-x a� �H yr t�,'�' X ,.- j:' '� yY #, �u+A �, S-=, " T" 1 �ts% ECkiWf ,} M' x 4 DAY1D,sVll,f�5 ".a�"xs x2, ..: A �, s �^F' `r s n v tom' ,�.. s "dx•_ s 1 , :; ial HDR-,ma�rWrS - . v q- 45r � y� e F -fH1 1 '•E;R1E�0 e 1EIGH71N4 XO RAIC on:su6s. Cro/� , S13j'ST4-.'u 5124Z: �3i `1`t' ' S, s57� $64;625 $125,319 .. .$327.438 $1,077,497 -. .. :$r- :?u Y..ts ^, ✓,y. sd+ r 3 "::i•.p,Ewla�iNF, •3 t , iT'a 'tt Page l d l 253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RFO No. 10-13058-00 PERRIS VALLEY LINE METROLINK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Project Sari: 1-Au9-10' HDR CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION COST PROPOSAL for ^S,UMMARY OF '. Construction Management Services, Materials Testing, and Construction Surveying ' PREcoNSTRucnoN � - PHASE COSTS PHASE: PRE -CONSTRUCTION TASKS" Project End: 31/7APr-1$ Duration (months): 33 No. EFFECTIVE DATES OF LABOR RATES »» - - - &mast 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011 - - -TOTAIL psi: SUMMARY . - =_ LABOR/IXPENSE ALLOCATION BY TASK PRE -CONSTRUCTION TASKS Task Description FIRM HDR-CCC - HDR-ENGR SIMON'' WON( - ARCADIS ARELLANO DAVID EVANS - slR4rnsul. GON2ALEZ- WHfTE GRIECO LEIGHTON XO RAIL. Total Labor Hours Total Labor Dollars Travel $Direct Expenses Grand Total... HOURS ' HOURS HOURS : _.. HOURS HOURS HOURS ;' HOURS HOURS - HOURS': HOURS, ;. HOURS; -:; ... ' .CASTS COSTS- . CiGETs � . C05T5... COSTS COSTS.: C05T5 + COSTS. •,. 'COSTS :'. ^ .`C(iSTS.!;% , . COSTS': ^ • 01 02 07 10 13 17 18 19 00 05 06 15 03 08 12 16 00 11 t rr. 6"tabi li ' MANAGEMENT a ADMINISTRATION R� m. :'-r „ .,V .., 5.; ._„ YS„1 ..,' .�.. krti >_ a ..M v __ .,.x _ -188 32 454 - - - 8 - 682 $ 125,857 ae. �* C Am "arvR "sn.tix�rc.. $ 125,857 $ 32,315 $ 5,656 $ 86,859 $ 1,026 - amka'aVi a"v „Sd.S .JI m., +.x Y15E.2 �. ��'a c"X: (+z''X' 348 ;20 -.:260 - _ ....- 8 ..18 24 _.,44 n 40': 832 $ 134,868 tt. v; -..a�.,°�i' S 134,868 $ 62.563 E 2,853 $ 38,660 $ 2,128 $ 2,053 $ 1,991 $ 5,782 $ 11213 $ 7,625 "» yV`1S'bS y r, ash^. 4, r, 1.. = zP ,o=. ix..: st u, t��iar .,�..... ..... 1.1,_- "�Y,. n .1 z� -, -�'�12 - 40 _ '..20B .250. -: . _ . �3E. �,58' .. , CAA... ._ - Ml. , '¢P 918 $ 154.433 l'�` °e $ 154,454 $ 39,881 $ 7,860 $ 34,146 $ 40,009 S 4,106 $ 4,738 $ 5,304 $ 10,612 $ 7,778 'V .2'.iy o-iYn�m..--s, n ..0 �'w.7i 1 � - ,:'�60 _.._. 200 ^8 . ., .� .�@ '� _ .4r 49 8 $ 418 79. �', �,Q.,` w`5,`%R,`4h.'«' S 7941 , 8 $ 25.057 $ $ 34,030 $ 1026 $ 11648 $ 76�56]� LSRa$`aLt - R{ tit 4x ; s i _ I 4 - 25 144- t& 24 14: A -002 $ 147,890 e16a,>a� $ 147,890 $ $ $ 31319 $ 2/,682 $ 2053 $ 1991 $ 3,671 2142 $ 7656 - y _....., ..'`' A. 40 $ 8.492 �rt�,i_2 a-*�„a" S 8,49277,376 $ 5498 $ $ 2,995 ,_,, :.r -tr '. c 80 " 00, - - _ .5i.2' .8 •. Y ; ` " .. 360= 960 $ 179,606 s�,'s % 'b $ 179,606 $ 4- E 14,001 $ 30,905 E 18,685 $ 1,026 $ 88,894 �"X„- ., ,..,.-,.�....I:.w&...,-.: ,,... .. ,!. -.._ _.. =�. - c'96' - o -28'4 - - --,. 430 $ 62,061 kkn.BBe'�'a:$ 62,061 $ 15,144 $ - $ 8,454 $ 38,463 c c"remep . 6 m o m-yg PROJECT CONTROLS �� ..,.a,., ,&.....,t a .,.1�,£.,., . r s r ._ � . , ^ z xEf 3 .: . - .. � 262 � .. ... .. - _. - - 262 $ 46.603 'a'L a v ab� m $ 45 `,.,03 $ 45,503 k 1,2 ' ..» G, „ ,?'d xl. 1 .. -< ,. _.�„ "sl. �,; ��a = - '`, 120 - .., 1Sb 't 248 - - - - 32 • .'40' 596 $ 104,46E '* 'Y` °�°r''°. S 104,468 $ 21 920 $ - $ 31,643 $ 39,089 $ 4,160 1 7,658 -q;q'y,q. ;a:- ::*4 Mr sw v,-„„:L...^.uti.r.-.. a"A:, ...: ,. n .: z ...a.t^�., , ,' ,:T32- 320 --12 .. -..._ - :i, . ., _-,. - � - 184 $ 87,515 mn 1L� °"m $ 87.616 $ 25,225 $ 59,590 $ 2.700 3.,7kuia..^:2k14,-J152 .::100 -.. - .. , - -f. �:24 ..r.. _. .... ..- . 480 $ 72,928 a s_¢ Ik...-lis, 4A $ 72,928 $ 35,372 $ - $ 19,821 $ 14,656 $ 3,079 - - Vartei'M'rett v a.7! al" :3,a.,e;I '^' ,-.%x.,,1 ^ .a � .�,!l. �1s.., s, ±. -224 ,217 --'174 40� .$ .j4' 679 $ 90,492 �aSq,,pi $ 90,492 $ 28.923 $ - $ 26,141 $ 25,660 $ 5,132 4,636 CestWitailei DUALITY ASSURANCE - xa Zkyi>m Ais ii,, nl�a .,`p-(::rS l'`S.:.14";1¢'-Slbi�(�w�Sk�at a`.,as,s^E,+k:� .. '2&1. - 132 16 ao 126 200. 838 $ 143921 CVvnHa,5\S�°ss. $ 143,921 46451 $ - $ 22.n2 $ 4256 $ 10,400 $ 21,764 $ 38,279 q °o._-. v�m is ,M aSssv?.1 ,`', a,. ; - .Y4. " ,,�"„+ t 1a �3 'x - .24 1,224 '24 - _ - - _ - - 4Q 1,312 $ 193,353 L o° d $ 193,353 $ 4,955 $ 175,375 $ 5,364 $' 7,656 # �m_° .;Wiaa:,,_�',,,,y- "= % -:na .+ki�1�'-` 'I`�•�''`µ,iw^ t'`'^ 48 - 80 336 - 40 512 $ 126,840 'm"a501'_L'k-;§"a' $ 126,840 $ 7,298 $ - $ 13538 $ 98,348 $ 7,656' m sus a cep £"sCS� trip Q.y�„1, y, e s 47'mitq%' 4 #1't;+t9s �`j`e 284 - 192 44 12 - 16 - 124 42 120' 834 $ 130,189 .:ti: a®s ': $ 130,189 $ 45247 $ - $ 26,980 $ 7,026 $ 3,192 $ 2,053 $ 16,214 $ 6,449 $ 23,028 y i ,:�?�..x ].; b�"i�� .•Lr ,.... J"{�iP:"4�.',�. -. - 112 - - 800 912 $ 124.263 � '�'yy � � $ 124,263 $ 17030 $ - $ 106,433 - no¢°c c la`s d a"n'a"'a ENVIRONMENTAL :aw ds�...za, Rd.,..+k..�.,'`��-�'^'� �. 104' 400 16. _ , . - - .-- ._- - 520 $ 81,951 S oai't'tk== . $ 61,951 $ 17,060 $ 41279 $ 3,612 Sw°:a .uT`.-'�+r? r"^ 's b,Yy� d(j�4�„b»"a aAFa$ - 468 80 ma $ 50,041 ,°,tdf.r.:" o°»L,"r $ 58,041 $ - $ 45,831 $ 12210 ` <1,5.', o-�`".:xb3.4 $ TOTAL LABOR- HOURS 3,208 2,846 3,499 960 294 424 168 104 436 294 984. 13,217 2,132,088 �{=� k�>c:-zL' 2,130,088 TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 554,212 $ 397,949 $ 538,581 $ 148,122 $ 38,463 $ 126,609 $ 21,555 $ 8,720 $ 57,179' t 52;100 $ 100518 �'-_.+_ _ "_.:_.a"_��=t'--;»;='i„^. ,: T=s++'•.-+5�',�',;-"v a� °4y'+ia_e.mE.»„ TOTAL ODC's $ 58,380 $ 17,2_60 $ 23,950 $ 4,700 $ 18,550 $ 1000 $ • $ - • $ 1,150 $ 9,625. $ 300 S.', YakNNka a. 4'i. 'p- $ 134,915 $ 134,915 4 3ewr�5%'Saao-xR_n'a _z_a'x�s x`a nik_Sa SUMMARY OF PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE COSTS $ 612,592 $ 415,209 $ 562,511 $ $ 1552.822 $ 57,013 $ 127,609 $ 21,555 $ 8,720 $ 58,329 $ 61,805 $ 188,818 13,217 $ 2,132,088 $ 134,915 $ 2,267,003 Pape 1 W I 254 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1104SPgRAiIIXI4V1#MISSMNI RFD No. 1131305600 PERRIS VALLEY LINE - METROLINKIMPROVEMENT PROJECT P,yectEM: t-Aag#8 Project EN: 3.;= ouale,(monmst —� EFFECTIVE DATES OF LABOR RATES> IAINM/EXPENSE ALLOCATION BY TASK CONSTRUCTION TASKS iask Deserip8an NOMAGEMEHT f ADMIMSTMTON HEIR CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION COST PROPOSAL for Construction Management Services, Materials Testing, and Construction Surveying Phase: CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Summary of Construction Phase Costs RPM HDR-CCC NOR-EKON SWE ARCAMS ARELLANO April 1, 2011 U1ru October 31, 2012 DAVID EVANS 6/ORADELL! GONZALEZ- GRIECO LEIGHTON XO RAIL HOURS HOURS HOURS POURS RWYS IgURS HOURS HOURS TOURS !OURS HOURS COST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS 66.24 - i. 107b79 as $ 18#07 TT Y 9 'i 135.156 - INOIMM f 53/8P i 1ax}Ba s :3.753 i 19Y�18T S I -708 11111111 116111111111 t TB839 }A rarl NM= 2 5,367111 S 338H i .3T.#H 132 PS.HT 4w 't�Cy.nA ✓ t e ..,r J ir. n :. _r®mow mgmassaynagu_siszetzszszentema simmenewintamemisiximsawa milassialas mama i a3 s1# EtAaRonimlTx TOTAL LABOR s 4.5123 538.611- i -. 2$33,7I52 '8 ; =YH26T i:.. 18$.4V8: i:.. 117A96 f- 413844 Paris 1ar 255 00.919 3' San i - 1.036$9 f .. 1,495,80 Yt' `e Graff Tad TOTAL COST SUMMARY Total Labor Travel 6 Direcl Dollars Expenses 19.707 - S 19.I07 S 3.196.144 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RFO No. 1043-058-00 PERRIS VALLEY LINE METROLINK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Project End: 1-Aug-10 Project End: 30-Apr-13 Duration (months): 33 DOLLAR COST WILL ONLY DISPLAY AT ENO OF EACH ROW, NOT UNDER EACH HOURLY ENTRY, HDR CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION COST PROPOSAL for Construction Management Services, Materials Testing, and Construction Surveying PHASE: POST- CONSTRUCTION TASKS- Summary of Post' Construction Costs, EFFECTIVE DATES OF LABOR RATES »» November.1, 2012 thru April. 30 2013'` 'TOTALCOST SUMMARY: LABOR/EXPENSE ALLOCATION BY TASK POST -CONSTRUCTION TASK Task Description FIRM HDR-CCC' HDR=ENGR` SWE,' - ARCADIS • ARELLANO DAVID. EVANS GHIRARDELLI GONZALEZ- WHITE GRIEGO LEIGHTON XO'RAIL HOURS HOURS HOURS. HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS.': COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS. COSTS • COSTS Total Labor Hours Tout Labor Dollars Travel A Direct Expenses Grand Total MANAGEMENT d, ADMINISTRATION $ 513,896.36 1,032'' $ 153.922 380 60,913 252' $ 33,304 56 $ 4,833 764 $ 103,331 28 E 2,635 $ 48,986 3,204 $ 466,820 l $ E 466,820 52 $ 9.339.92 $ 84,785.77 OUAITTY ASSURANCE 106; 5 17,318 t: $ 40,502 $ 60,913 115 $ 45,628 90' E 5,235 292 $ 38,539 198 1,715 $ 31,893 $ 270,368 S 1. E 31,893 270,368 E $ $ 7,834 a 48 7,834 $ 7,834 zz s s $ s $ a s a a $ s s a $ s s s s $ $ S a s s $ $ s a s a s a s $ s s s TOTAL LABOR HOURS TOTAL LABOR COSTS .TOTAL ODC•3 1,076 $ 153,022 $ 9,226 1,422 $ 219 576 $ 10,600 760 $ 121,826 $ - 4,300 115 $ 45,628 $ 6,600 584 $ 77,077 $ 56 $ 4,833 764 $ 103,331 $ 7,865 28 $ 2,635 $ 200 360 $ 48,986 $ 2,170 Sub Total 5,165 $ 776,915 $ 40261 E 776,915 $ 40,361 TOTAL COSTS $ 162248 $ 229,576 $ 126,126 $ - $ 52,228 $ 77,077 $ 4,833 $ 111096 $ 2,15 $ 51,156 Grand Total 5,165 $ 776,915 $ 40,361 $ 817,276 Page 1 al 1 256 • • • EXHIBrr "D" FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, including the other Exhibits attached thereto, the following provisions shall apply if funding for the Services is provided, in whole or in part, from the Federal Transit Administration ("FTA"). In addition, Exhibits "H" and "I" attached to this Agreement, may be replaced and substituted with similar forms required by FTA. Consultant agrees to complete any such substitute forms. 1. NO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS TO THIRD -PARTIES BY USE OF A DISCLAIMER (Master Agreements §2.f) (1) The Commission and Consultant acknowledge and agree that, notwithstanding any concurrence by the Federal Government in or approval of the solicitation or award of the underlying contract, absent the express written consent by the Federal Government ("Government"), the Federal Government is not a party to this contract and shall not be subject to any obligations or liabilities to the Commission, Consultant, or any other party (whether or not a party to that contract) pertaining to any matter resulting from the underlying contract. (2) The Consultant agrees to include the above clause in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA. It is further agreed that the clause shall not be modified, except to identify the subconsultant who will be subject to its provisions. 2. PROGRAM FRAUD AND FALSE OR FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS AND RELATED ACTS (Master Agreement §3.f) (1) The Consultant acknowledges that the provisions of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, as amended, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3801 et seq. and U.S. DOT regulations, "Program Fraud Civil Remedies," 49 C.F.R. Part 31, apply to its actions pertaining to this Project. Upon execution of the underlying contract, the Consultant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION MASTER AGREEMENT For Federal Transit Administration Agreements authorized by 49 U.S.C. chapter 53, Title 23, U.S.C. (Highways), Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, the National Capital Transportation Act of 1969, as amended, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, as amended, 23 U.S.C. § 101 note, or other Federal enabling legislation; FTA MA(14); October 1, 2007; Ihttp://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/14-Master.pdfl. RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit D-1 257 certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of any statement it has made, it makes, it may make, or causes to be made, pertaining to the underlying contract or the FTA assisted project for which this contract work is being performed. In addition to other penalties that may be applicable, the Consultant further acknowledges that if it makes,. or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submission, or certification, the Federal Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 on the Consultant to the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate. (2) The Consultant also acknowledges that if it makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submission, certification, assurance, or representation to the Federal Government under a contract connected with a project that is financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance originally awarded by FTA under the authority of 49 U.S.C. chapter 53 or any other Federal law, the Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 49 U.S.C. § 5323 on the Consultant, to the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate. (3) The Consultant agrees to include the above two clauses in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA. It is further agreed that the clauses shall not be modified, except to identify the subconsultant who will be subject to the provisions. 3. ACCESS TO RECORDS (Master Agreement §§ 8.c, d, t) 1. Consultant agrees to provide the Commission, the FTA Administrator, the U.S. Secretary of Transportation, the Comptroller General of the United States or any of their authorized representatives access to all Project work, materials, payrolls, and other data of the Consultant which are directly pertinent to this contract as required by 49 U.S.C. § 5325(g). 2. The Consultant agrees to permit any of the foregoing parties to reproduce by any means whatsoever or to copy excerpts and transcriptions as reasonably needed. 3. The Consultant agrees to maintain all books, records, accounts and reports required under this contract for a period of not less than three years after the date of transmission of the final expenditure report, except in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this contract, in which case Consultant agrees to maintain same until the Commission, the FTA Administrator, the Comptroller General, or any of their duly authorized representatives, have disposed of all such litigation, appeals, claims or exceptions related thereto. Reference 49 CFR 18.39(i)(11). 4. FTA does not require the inclusion of these requirements in subcontracts. 4. FEDERAL CHANGES RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit D-2 258 • • • • • (Master Agreement §2.c(1)) Consultant shall at all times comply with all applicable FTA regulations, policies, procedures and directives, including without limitation those listed directly or by reference in the Grant Agreement or Cooperative Agreement between the Commission or the Riverside Transit Agency and the Federal Government ("Grant Agreement or Cooperative Agreement"), as they may be amended or promulgated from time to time during the term of this contract. Consultant's failure to so comply shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 5. CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS (Master Agreement §12) (1) Nondiscrimination - In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d et seq., U.S. DOT regulations, "Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation — Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act," 49 C.F.R. Part 21, FTA Circular 4702.1A, "Title VI and Tivle VI Dependent Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Receipts," May 13, 2007, Federal transit law at 49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, age, or disability. In addition, the Consultant agrees to comply with applicable Federal implementing regulations and other implementing requirements FTA may issue. (2) Equal Employment Opportunity - The following equal employment opportunity requirements apply to the underlying contract: (a) Race, Color, Creed, National Origin, Sex - The Consultant agrees to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and equal employment opportunity provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 5332, all applicable equal employment opportunity requirements of U.S. Department of Labor (U.S. DOL) regulations, "Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor," 41 C.F.R. Parts 60 et seq., (which implement Executive Order No. 11246, "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order No. 11375, "Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity," 42 U.S.C. § 2000e note), and with any applicable Federal statutes, executive orders, regulations, and Federal policies that may in the future affect construction activities undertaken in the course of the Project. The Consultant agrees to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. In addition, the Consultant agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue. RVPUD\HSHANE\772691-1 Exhibit D-3 259 (b) Age - In accordance with the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 through 634 and Federal transit law at 49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Consultant agrees to refrain from discrimination against present and prospective employees for reason of age. In addition, the Consultant agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue. (c) Disabilities - In accordance with section 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 12112, the Consultant agrees that it will comply with the requirements of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, "Regulations to Implement the Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act," 29 C.F.R. Part 1630, pertaining to employment of persons with disabilities. In addition, the Consultant agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue. (3) DBE Program Compliance - The Commission has established a DBE Program pursuant to 49 C.F.R. Part 26, which applies to FTA funded agreements. The requirements and procedures of the Commission's DBE Program are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. Consultant shall complete Exhibits "H" through "I" of this Agreement, or similar forms to be provided by the Commission, in compliance with the Commission's DBE Program for FTA funded agreements. Failure by Consultant or its subcontractor(s) to carry out the Commission's DBE Program procedures and requirements, or the applicable requirements of 49 C.F.R. Part 26, section 1101(b) of SAFETEA-LU, 23 U.S.C. § 101 note, and U.S. DOT regulations, "Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs," 49 C.F.R. Part 26, shall be considered a material breach of this Agreement. Such a material breach may be grounds for termination of this Agreement or such other appropriate administrative remedy as the Commission deems appropriate. The Consultant shall ensure that a provision mandating compliance with the Commission's DBE Program for FTA funded agreements is included in any and all sub -agreements entered into which arise out of or are related to this Agreement. Consultant shall also promptly provide the Commission with all necessary information related to the DBE status of its subcontractors. Should the DBE status of any of its subcontractors change in any way, Consultant shall promptly inform the Commission of this change. (4) The Consultant also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA, modified only if necessary to identify the affected parties. 6. TERMINATION PROVISIONS (Master Agreement §11) The termination provisions found at Section 3.14 of this Agreement are consistent with the termination provisions suggested by FTA for the protection of the Federal RVPUH\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit D-4 260 • • • • Govemment. The termination provisions found at Section 3.14 of this Agreement control termination under this Agreement. 7. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (Master Agreement §3.b) Instructions for Certification 1. By signing and submitting this Agreement, the Consultant is providing the signed certification set out below. 2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the Consultant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, Commission may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 3. The Consultant shall provide immediate written notice to Commission if at any time the Consultant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "lower tier covered transaction," "participant," "persons," "lower tier covered transaction," "principal," "proposal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549 [49 CFR Part 29]. You may contact Commission for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5. The Consultant agrees by executing this Agreement that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized in writing by Commission. 6. The Consultant further agrees by executing this Agreement that it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transaction", without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. 7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the Nonprocurement List issued by U.S. General Service Administration. RVPUS\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit D-5 261 8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business. dealings. 9. Except for transactions authorized under Paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to all remedies available to the Federal Government, Commission may pursue available remedies including suspension and/or debarment. 10. The Consultant agrees to comply, and assures the compliance of each subconsultant, lessee, or third party contractor, with Executive Orders Nos. 12549 and 12689, "Debarment and Suspension," 31 U.S.C. § 6101 note, and U.S. DOT regulations, "Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)," 49 C.F.R. Part 29. 11. The Consultant agrees to, and assures that its subconsultants, lessees and third party contractors will review the "Excluded Parties Listing System" at http://elps.gov/ before entering into any third subagreement, lease or third party contract. "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion" (1) The Consultant certifies, by submission of this bid or proposal, that neither it nor its "principals" [as defined at 49 C.F.R. § 29.105(p)] is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment; declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. (2) When the Consultant is unable to certify to the statements in this certification, it shall attach an explanation to this proposal. RVPOB\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit D-6 • 262 • • • 8. PROVISIONS FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES, BREACHES, OR OTHER LITIGATION (Master Agreement §53) Disputes - Disputes arising in the performance of this Contract which are not resolved by agreement of the parties shall be decided in writing by the authorized representative of Commission's [title of employee]. This decision shall be final and conclusive unless within [ten (10)] days from the date of receipt of its copy, the Consultant mails or otherwise furnishes a written appeal to the [title of employee]. In connection with any such appeal, the Consultant shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of its position. The decision of the [title of employee] shall be binding upon the Consultant and the Consultant shall abide be the decision. Performance During Dispute - Unless otherwise directed by Commission, Consultant shall continue performance under this Contract while matters in dispute are being resolved. Claims for Damages - Should either party to the Contract suffer injury or damage to person or property because of any act or omission of the party or of any of his employees, agents or others for whose acts he is legally liable, a claim for damages therefor shall be made in writing to such other party within a reasonable time after the first observance of such injury of damage. Remedies - Unless this contract provides otherwise, all claims, counterclaims, disputes and other matters in question between the Commission and the Consultant arising out of or relating to this agreement or its breach will be decided by arbitration if the parties mutually agree, or in a court of competent jurisdiction within the State in which the Commission is located. Rights and Remedies - The duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents and the rights and remedies available thereunder shall be in addition to and not a limitation of any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. No action or failure to act by the Commission, (Architect) or Consultant shall constitute a waiver of any right or duty afforded any of them under the Contract, nor shall any such action or failure to act constitute an approval of or acquiescence in any breach thereunder, except as may be specifically agreed in writing. FTA Notification — Consultant shall notify FTA in writing of any current or prospective major dispute, breach, default, or litigation that may affect the Federal Government's interests in the Project. If the Consultant wishes to name the Federal Government as a party to litigation, the Consultant shall inform FTA in writing before doing so. 9. LOBBYING (Master Agreement §3.d) RVPUR\HSHAN6\772641.1 Exhibit D-7 263 Lobbying Restrictions. To the extent applicable, Consultant agrees to: (1) Comply, and assure the compliance of each subcontractor at any tier, with U.S. DOT regulations, "New Restrictions on Lobbying," 49 C.F.R. Part 20, modified as necessary by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. (2) Comply with Federal statutory provisions, to the extent applicable, prohibiting the use of Federal assistance funds for activities designed to influence Congress or a State legislature on legislation or appropriations, except through proper, official channels. 10. CLEAN AIR (Master Agreement §25.b) (1) The Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 through 7671q. The Consultant agrees to report each violation to the Commission and understands and agrees that the Commission will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to FTA and the appropriate EPA Regional Office. (2) The Consultant also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $100,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA. 11. CLEAN WATER (Master Agreement §25.c) (1) The Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 through 1377. The Consultant agrees to report each violation to the Commission and understands and agrees that the Commission will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to FTA and the appropriate EPA Regional Office. (2) The Consultant also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $100,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA. 12. ENERGY CONSERVATION (Master Agreement §26) Energy Conservation. To the extent applicable, Consultant agrees to comply with the mandatory energy efficiency standards and policies within the applicable State energy conservation plans issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, RVPUB\HSHANE\772691.1 Exhibit D-8 • • 264 • 42 U.S.C. §§ 6321 et seq. To the extent applicable, Consultant agrees to perform an energy assessment for any building constructed, reconstructed, or modified with FTA assistance, as provided in FTA regulations, "Requiremetns for Energy Assessments," 49 C.F.R. Part 622, Subpart C. 13. CONFORMANCE WITH NATIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE (Master Agreement §15.m) National Intelligent Transportation Systems Architecture and Standards. To the extent applicable, Consultant agrees to conform, to the extent applicable, to the National Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Architecture and Standards as required by section SAFETEA-LU § 5307(c), 23 U.S.C. § 512 note, and with FTA Notice, "FTA National ITS Architecture Policy on Transit Projects" 66 Fed. Reg. 1455 et seq., January 8, 2001, and other subsequent Federal directives that may be issued. 15. IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986 Consultant assumes full responsibility for verifying the identity and employment authorization of all of its employees performing work under this Agreement in compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, and rules and regulations promulgated in connection therewith (hereinafter "IRCA"). Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold Commission harmless from and against any claims, loss, damage, liability, costs or expenses arising from any noncompliance with the provisions or I RCA. 16. SPECIAL PROVISIONS (Master Agreement § 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48) To the extent applicable, Consultant agrees to comply with the Federal programs specified below and, with regard to such programs, Consultant agrees not to compromise the Commission's compliance with Federal requirements as pertains to the Project. The Programs are as follows: (1) Urbanized Area Formula Program authorized under 49 U.S.C. § 4307. (2) Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Formula Program authorized under 49 U.S.C. § 5310 as amended by SAFETEA-LU and subsection 3012(b) of SAFETEA-LU, 49 U.S.C. § 5310 note, respectively. (3) New Freedom Program authorized under 49 U.S.C. § 5317. RVPUB\HSHANE\772691.1 Exhibit D-9 265 (4) Nonurbanized Area Formula Program authorized under 49 U.S.C. § 5311(b). (5) Clean Fuels Grant Program authorized under 49 U.S.C. § 5308. (6) Job Access and Reverse Commute Formula Grant Program authorized under 49 U.S.C. § 5316. 17. RELEASE OF RETAINAGE (49 CFR 26.29) The Commission may hold retainage from the prime contractor and, if it does so, shall make prompt and regular incremental acceptances of of portions, as determined by the Commission of the contract work and pay retainage to prime contractors based on these acceptances. The prime contractor or subcontractor shall return all monies withheld in retention from a subcontractor within 30 days after receiving payment for work satisfactorily completed and accepted including incremental acceptances of portions of the contract work by the Commission. Federal regulations (49 CFR 26.29) require that any delay or postponement of payment over 30 days may take place only for good cause and with the Commission's prior written approval. Any violation of this provision shall subject the violating prime contractor or subcontractor to the penalties, sancions, and other remedies specified in Section 7108.5 of the California Business and Professions Code. These requirements shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative, or judicial remedies otherwise available to the prime contractor or subcontractor in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by the prime contractor, deficient subconract performance, or noncompliance by a subcontractor. This provision applies to both DBE and non -DBE prime contractors and subcontractors. 18. INCORPORATION OF FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) TERMS The preceding provisions include, in part, certain Standard Terms and Conditions required by the Federal Transit Authority, whether or not expressly set forth in the preceding contract provisions. All contractual provisions required by the Federal Transit Authority, as set forth in FTA Circular 4220.1 E, are hereby incorporated by reference. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, all FTA mandated terms shall be deemed to control in the event of a conflict with other provisions contained in this Agreement. The Contractor shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any Commission requests which would cause the Commission to be in violation of the FTA terms and conditions. RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit D-10 • 266 • • EXHIBIT "E" CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTANT I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the and duly authorized representative of the firm of whose address is and that, except as hereby expressly stated, neither I nor the above firm that I represent have: (a) employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or other consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) to solicit or secure this agreement; nor (b) agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out the agreement; nor (c) paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out this agreement. RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 By: Signature Name Title Date Exhibit E 267 ExHlelr "F" CERTIFICATE OF COMMISSION I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the of the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, and that the consulting firm of or its representative has not been required (except as herein expressly stated), directly or indirectly, as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this Agreement to: (a) employ, retain, agree to employ or retain, any firm or person; or (b) pay or agree to pay, to any firm, person or organization, any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind. By: RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 Signature Name Title Date Exhibit F 269 • • • EXHIBIT "G" DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) CONSULTANT CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS The provisions of Title 49, Part 26, Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR 26) and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION'S adopted DBE Program require that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) have the opportunity to participate in federally -funded, transportation projects. The Commission's overall annual DBE goal for projects funded by Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Funds for the 2009-2010 Fiscal Year is Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, and the exhibits attached hereto, the following provisions shall apply if funding for the Services is provided, in whole or in part, from the United States Department of Transportation (DOT): 1. DISCRIMINATION The Commission shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any DOT -assisted contract or in the implementation of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26. The Commission shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT -assisted contracts. Consultant or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, of sex in the performance of this contract. Consultant shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 and the Commission's DBE program in the award and administration of DOT -assisted contracts, as further set forth below. 2. PROMPT PAYMENT Consultant agrees to pay each subcontractor under this prime contract for satisfactory performance of its contract no later than 10 days from the receipt of each payment the prime contractor receives from the Commission. Any delay or postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good cause following written approval of the Commission. This clause applies to both DBE and non -DBE subcontractors. 3. RELEASE OF RETAINAGE The Commission shall hold retainage from the prime contractor and shall make prompt and regular incremental acceptances of portions, as determined by the Commission of the contract work and pay retainage to prime contractors based on these acceptances. The prime contractor or subcontractor shall return all monies withheld in retention from RVPUH\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit G 271 a subcontractor within 30 days after receiving payment for work satisfactorily completed and accepted including incremental acceptances of portions of the contract work by the Commission. Federal regulations (49 CFR 26.29) require that any delay or postponement of payment over 30 days may take place only for good cause and with the Commission's prior written approval. Any violation of this provision shall subject the violating prime contractor or subcontractor to the penalties, sanctions, and other remedies specified in Section 7108.5 of the California Business and Professions Code. These requirements shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative, or judicial remedies otherwise available to the prime contractor or subcontractor in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by the prime contractor, deficient subcontract performance, or noncompliance by a subcontractor. This provision applies to both DBE and non -DBE prime contractors and subcontractors. 4. LEGAL REMEDIES In addition to those contract remedies set forth under relevant provisions of California law, either party to this Agreement may, where applicable, seek legal redress for violations of this Agreement pursuant to the relevant provisions of 49 C.F.R. Part 26, to the relevant federal or state statutory provisions governing civil rights violations, and to the relevant federal and state provisions governing false claims or "whistleblower" actions, as well as any and all other applicable federal and state provisions of law. The Consultant shall include a provision to this effect in each of its agreements with its subcontractors. 5. DBE PARTICIPATION Even if no DBE participation will be reported, Consultant shall complete Exhibits "H" and "I" of this Agreement in compliance with the Commission's DBE program. A. This Agreement is subject to Title 49, Part 26, Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR 26) entitled "Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs." In order to ensure that the Commission achieves its federally mandated overall DBE goal, the Commission encourages the participation of DBEs, as defined in 49 CFR 26, in the performance of Agreements financed in whole or in part with federal funds. The Contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of subcontracts. As required by federal law, the Commission has established an overall DBE goal for projects funded by FTA funds. In order to ascertain whether that overall DBE goal is being achieved, the Commission is tracking DBE participation on all FTA funded contracts. RVPUB\HSHANE\772691.1 Exhibit G 272 • • B. The Commission advises that participation of DBEs in the specified percentage is not a condition of award. C. Contractor has agreed to carry out the applicable requirements of Title 49 CFR 26, in the award and administration of federally assisted Agreements. The regulations in their entirety are incorporated herein and by reference. D. The Contractor should notify Commission's Representative in writing, of any changes to its anticipated DBE participation. This notice should be provided prior to the commencement of that portion of the work. E. DBE and other small businesses (SB), as defined in Title 49 CFR 26 are encouraged to participate in the performance of agreements financed in whole or in part with federal funds. The contractor, sub recipient or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this Agreement. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of Ttitle 49 CFR 26 in the award and administration of US DOT- assisted agreements. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this Agreement, which may result in the termination of this Agreement or such other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate. F. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this Agreement shall contain all of the provisions of this section. 6. DBE PARTICIPATION GENERAL INFORMATION It is Consultant's responsibility to be fully informed regarding the requirements of 49 CFR, Part 26, and the Commission's DBE program. Particular attention is directed to the following: A. A DBE must be a small business firm defined pursuant to 13 CFR 121 and be certified through the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP). B. A certified DBE may participate as a prime contractor, subcontractor, joint venture partner, as a vendor of material or supplies, or as a trucking company. C. A DBE joint -venture partner must be responsible for specific contract items of work or clearly defined portions thereof. Responsibility means actually performing, managing and supervising the work with its own forces. The DBE joint venture partner must share in the capital contribution, control, management, risks and profits_ of. the joint -venture commensurate with its ownership interest. D. A DBE must perform a commercially useful function, pursuant to 49 CFR 26.55 that is, must be responsible for the execution of a distinct element of the work and must carry out its responsibility by actually performing, managing and supervising the work, as more fully described in section 8 below. RVPUH\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit G 273 E. The Consultant shall list only one subcontractor for each portion of work as defined in the Consultant's bid/proposal and all DBE subcontractors should be listed in the Consultant's bid/cost proposal list of subcontractors. F. A Consultant who is a certified DBE is eligible to claim all of the work in the Agreement toward the DBE participation except that portion of the work to be performed by non -DBE subcontractors. 7 . COMMERCIALLY USEFUL FUNCTION A DBE performs a commercially useful function when it is responsible for execution of the work of the Agreement and is carrying out its responsibilities by actually performing, managing, and supervising the work involved. To perform a commercially useful function, the DBE must also be responsible with respect to materials and supplies used on the Agreement, for negotiating price, determining quality and quantity, ordering the material, and installing (where applicable) and paying for the material itself. To determine whether a DBE is performing a commercially useful function, evaluate the amount of work subcontracted, industry practices; whether the amount the firm is to be paid under the Agreement is commensurate with the work it is actually performing, and other relevant factors. B. A DBE does not perform a commercially useful function if its role is limited to that of an extra participant in a transaction, Agreement, or project through which funds are passed in order to obtain the appearance of DBE participation. In determining whether a DBE is such an extra participant, examine similar transactions, particularly those in which DBEs do not participate. C. If a DBE does not perform or exercise responsibility for at least thirty percent of the total cost of its Agreement with its own work force, or the DBE subcontracts a greater portion of the work of the Agreement than would be expected on the basis of normal industry practice for the type of work involved, it will be presumed that it is not performing a commercially useful function. 8. DBE CERTIFICATION AND DE -CERTIFICATION STATUS If a DBE subcontractor is decertified during the life of the Agreement, the decertified subcontractor shall notify the Contractor in writing with the date of de -certification. If a subcontractor becomes a certified DBE during the life of the Agreement, the subcontractor shall notify the Contractor in writing with the date of certification. ,Any changes should be reported to the Commission's Representative within 30 days. RVPUB\HSHANE\772691.1 Exhibit G 274 • • • 9. DBE RECORDS A. The Contractor shall maintain records of materials purchased and/or supplied from all subcontracts entered into with certified DBEs. The records shall show the name . and business address of each DBE or vendor and the total dollar amount actually paid each DBE or vendor, regardless of tier. The records shall show the date of payment and the total dollar figure paid to all firms. DBE prime Contractors shall also show the date of work performed by their own forces along with the corresponding dollar value of the work. B. Upon completion of the Agreement, a summary of these records shall be prepared and submitted on the form entitled, "Final Report -Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE)," CEM- 2402F (Exhibit 17-F in Chapter 17 of the LAP), attached to this Agreement as Exhibit "H", certified correct by the Contractor or the Contractor's authorized representative and shall be furnished to the Commission's Representative with the final invoice. Failure to provide the summary of DBE payments with the final invoice will result in twenty-five percent (25%) of the dollar value of the invoice being withheld from payment until the form is submitted. The amount will be returned to the Contractor when a satisfactory "Final Report Utilization of Disadvantaged Business 'Enterprises (DBE)"is submitted to the Commission's Representative. a. Prior to the fifteenth of each month, the Contractor shall submit documentation to the Commission's Representative showing the amount paid to DBE trucking companies. The Contractor shall also obtain and submit documentation to the Commission's Representative showing the amount paid by DBE trucking companies to all firms, including owner -operators, for the leasing of trucks. If the DBE leases trucks from a non -DBE, the Contractor may count only the fee or commission the DBE receives as a result of the lease arrangement. b. The Contractor shall also submit to the Commission's Representative documentation showing the truck number, name of owner, California Highway Patrol CA number, and if applicable, the DBE certification number of the truck owner for all trucks used during that month. This documentation shall be submitted on the Ca!trans "Monthly DBE Trucking Verification, CEM- 2404(F) form provided to the Contractor by the Commission's Representative, or on such other form as may be provided by the Commission's Representative. 10. REPORTING MATERIAL OR SUPPLIES PURCHASED FROM DBEs When Reporting DBE Participation, Material or Supplies purchased from DBEs may count as follows: A. If the materials or supplies are obtained from a DBE manufacturer, 100 % of the cost of the materials or supplies will count toward the DBE participation. A DBE manufacturer is a firm that operates or maintains a factory or establishment that RVPUE\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit G 275 produces on the premises, the materials, supplies, articles, or equipment required under the Agreement and of the general character described by the specifications. B. If the materials or supplies purchased from a DBE regular dealer, count 60 % of, the cost of the materials or supplies toward DBE goals. A DBE regular dealer is a firm that owns, operates or maintains a store, warehouse, or other establishment in which the materials, supplies, articles or equipment of the general character described by the specifications and required under the Agreement, are bought, kept in stock, and regularly sold or leased to the public in the usual course of business. To be a DBE regular dealer, the firm must be an established, regular business that engages, as its principal business and under its own name, in the purchase and sale or lease of the products in question. A person may be a DBE regular dealer in such bulk items as petroleum products, steel, cement, gravel, stone or asphalt without owning, operating or maintaining a place of business provided in this section. C. If the person both owns and operates distribution equipment for the products, any supplementing of regular dealers' own distribution equipment, shall be by a long-term lease agreement and not an ad hoc or Agreement -by -Agreement basis. Packagers, brokers, manufacturers' representatives, or other persons who arrange or expedite transactions are not DBE regular dealers within the meaning of this section. D. Materials or supplies purchased from a DBE, which is neither a manufacturer nor a regular dealer, will be limited to the entire amount of fees or commissions charged for assistance in the procurement of the materials and supplies, or fees or transportation charges for the delivery of materials or supplies required on the job site, provided the fees are reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees charged for similar services. 11. REPORTING PARTICIPATION OF DBE TRUCKING COMPANIES When Reporting DBE Participation, Participation of DBE trucking companies may count as follows: A. The DBE must be responsible for the management and supervision of the entire trucking operation for which it is responsible. B. The DBE must itself own and operate at least one fully licensed, insure, and operational truck used on the Agreement. C. The DBE receives credit for the total value of the transportation services it provides on the Agreement using trucks it owns, insures, and operates using drivers it employs. D. The DBE may lease trucks from another DBE firm including an owner -operator who is certified as a DBE. The DBE who leases trucks from another DBE receives credit RVPUS\HSHANE\772691.1 Exhibit G 276 • • for the total value of the transportation services the lessee DBE provides on the Agreement. E. The DBE may also lease trucks from a non -DBE firm, including an owner - operator. The DBE who leases trucks from a non -DBE is entitled to credit only for the fee or commission it receives as a result of the lease arrangement. The DBE does not receive credit for the total value of the transportation services provided by the lessee, since these services are not provided by the DBE. F. For the purposes of this section, a lease must indicate that the DBE has exclusive use and control over the truck. This does not preclude the leased truck from working for others during the term of the lease with the consent of the DBE, as long as the lease gives the DBE absolute priority for use of the leased truck. Leased trucks must display the name and identification number of the DBE. RVPUH\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit G 277 6LZ i-H li94ipcg aaaul6u3 eak d1O — Ado0 (£) salt' loafoad Aoue6e moo' — Ado0 (sluawaaa6V uospn lewalx3;o aog;O 'saanlan48;o uolslnl0 0l papa/Awl leul6po) saanllpuedx3;o poda8 ay; ul papnpul 3v10 0l /Woo auo snld leu40 Z'Lb9 ZLL\SNYHSH\UndAH :uopnqulsl0 31V0 2139W11N 3N0Hd SS3NISn9 3Mn1VN'JIS 2333NION3 1N301S3N 103212100 ONV 3131d1NO0 SI NOI1VINHOdNl 3AO13V 3H130031MONH AW 3O 1S38 3141 Ol 31V0 2339WnN 3N0Hd SS3NISn9 3NO1VN'OIS 3AI1V1N3S3Nd321 23O10V211NO0 103212100 0NV 3131dWO0 SI NO11VINNOdNl 3AOSV 3H11VH1 A3112130 I !!pan lea Mi pals!! Apeul6uo uey3 )uaia#lp p uena '380 yoea oI pled 3unowe pope Isll aged alaaedas a uo sluawwoo apinoad 'luana;o aw8 le panwdde ley! uey) Iuaiaj.pp sem ()pomp wail ao) uonzllBn 390 min moan leo6 io; pals!! Alleul6uo aaaM swag ay) lou ao aay)ayM'Jag ;o ssalpaeBaa (s;380) sasudaalu3 ssaulsn8 pa quenpesl0 'saoloealuoogn8 aa!1 Isald Ile lsn •LOZZ-LZZ 01.g) Bump Aq J0 3oegx3 Neole0 egl 6ulpeolumop pue (/oaq/by/Aob•eo•lop•mMM/rOW)) 30MS `391AIS `390 39MS '390 ellsgem s;g6R1 1!A!0 eq; 6ulsseooe Aq peulem eq Amu sn3e3s weaoid 390 me0 uoReildx3 sp.% ago se Hem S S se sn3e3s =Amid Jlego selels iegl olun sig6121 HAD ey3 Aq e3eol;1>aea a penes! el wn; peweo eql 'uoneo3llNeo to emu 3e senssl lonuoa pue dlysieumo'Jepue6'A3lalugw uo peseq win uolle01.113J00 %Old IIA10 ey3 Aq peulwue3ep si sn3e3s wei6odid sly! 38WS'390 390 `pe11IL1e0 sI Will ego (s)wel6ad legm uo peseq el enlen Jellop 390 ego Buuelue Jo; pesn eq o3 uwnloo golgm Jo uolsloep egl. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1V1O1 1N3W11WWO0lVNIOP:10 $ $ $ $ $ • 1N3WAVd 1VNId JO31tl0 3131dWOO >NOM31V0 ,38MS '391M119'300 .38/V1S'300 OEMS'33a .390 380-uoN • S1N3WAVd 1OV231NOO 'ON 1830 380 0301AOHd S1V12:131VW 0NV 031,1180 33d MON\ d0 NOIld123O830 'ON W311 $ 1NnOWtl 1OYd1NOO 031VWI1S3 9S3800V SS3NISn8 23O10V211NO0 31AlR3d 31V0 NO1131dWOO 10V211NO0 AON3OV ON18318INIWOV 'oN 103f O8d OIV 1V23303d 88313WO11>11S0d/S311W 1SOd 31nOb A1Nn0O M38WnN 1OV231N0O • Z-Z09£-lb9L# 10 (66/01. Aa211 (d)ZObZ W3O-dO (S1O31.0Hd (713ONnd Al1V23303d) SMOlOV231NOO811S 21311-1S2314'(38O) S3S121d2131N3 SMIS118 O30VINVAOVSIO dO NOI1VZI in-1N0c1321 1VNId uHn q?q;FqxB • • • • EXHIBIT "I" DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PARTICIPATION GOALS FOR CONTRACT AND PROJECT LOCAL AGENCY BIDDER DBE INFORMATION This information may be submitted with your bid proposal. If it is not, and you are the apparent low bidder or the second of third low bidder, it must be submitted and received by the administering agency no later than the time specified in the special provisions. CO.RTE.PM: BIDDER'S NAME: CONTRACT NO.: BID AMOUNT: $ ADDRESS: BID OPENING DATE: DBE GOAL FROM CONTRACT CONTRACT ITEM NO. ITEM OF WORK AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK OR SERVICES TO BE CONTRACTED OR MATERIALS TO BE PROVIDED NAME OF DBE** (Name of DBEs, Certification Number, and Telephone Number) DOLLAR AMOUNT *•* DBE PERCENT Total Claimed Participation 14 *If 100% of item is not to be performed or furnished by DBE, describe exact portion, including planned location of work to be performed, or item to be performed or furnished by DBE. **DBE's must be certified by a Califomia Unified Certification Program certifying agency on the date bids are opened. Subcontractors and suppliers certified State -funded only cannot be used to meet goals on federally funded contracts. ***Credit for a DBE supplier, who is not a manufacturer is limited to 60% of the amount paid to the supplier. (See Section "Disadvantaged Business" DBE of the special provisions.) IMPORTANT: Names of DBE subcontractors and their respective item(s) of work listed above should be consistent with the name and items of work in the "List of Subcontractors" submitted with your bid pursuant to the Subcontractors Listing Law. Signature of Bidder Date (Area Code) Telephone No. RVPUBAHSHANEV772691.1 Exhibit J-1 281 Person to Contact (Please Print or Type) RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit J-2 • • 282 • • RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 EXHIBIT " J" DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES [ATTACHED BEHIND THIS PAGE] Exhibit J-1 283 • Local Assistttbce Procedures Manaal EXHIBIT 110-Q Discosure of Lobbying Activities Exhibit 10-Q Disclosure of Lobbying Activities DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES COMPLETE THIS FORM TD DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352 1. Type of Federal Action: ❑ 8. enllkaet b, grant C. cooperative agreement d. loan e. loan guarantee f. loan insurance 4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity ❑ Prime Subawardee Tier , iPknown Congressional District, if known 6. Federal Department/Agency: 8. Federal Action Number, if known: le. a. Name and Address of Lobby Entity (If individual, last name, fast name, MI) 2. Status of Federal Action: ❑ a bid/offer/application b. Mirk) award c. post -award 3. Report Type: ❑ a, initial b. material change For Material Change Only: year_ quarter date of last report 5. 11Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prince: Congressional District, if known 7. Federal Program Name/Description: CFDA Number, if applicable 9. Award Amount, if known: b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if different from No. I Oa) (last name, first wane, MD (attach Continuation Sheets) if necessary) II. Amount of Payment (rlteck all that apply) 13. Type of Payment (check all [bat apply) S ❑ actual ❑ planted a. 'claimer b. one-time fee 12. Form of Payment lebeek all that apply} c. commission 8 a. cash d. contingent fee b. in -kind; specify: nature a deferred value f. other, specify 14. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Deets) of Service, including ofFicer(s), employee(s), or meneber(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 11: (attach Continuation Sheets) if necessary) 15. Continuation Sheet(c) artaehed: Yes D No ❑ 16. Information rapeseed lMough this faun is authorized by Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. his disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be «ported to Congress semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Arry person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than S I0,000 and not more than S100,000 for each such failure. Federal Use Only: Signature: Print Name: Title: Telephone No Date: Authorised for Local Reproduction Standard Form - LI.I. Srrrdard Form I1.L Rev. 0418-06 LPP 06-02 RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit J-2 Page 10-77 May 1, 2006 285 EXHBIT 10-Q Local Assistance Procedures Manual Disclosure of Lobbying Activities INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether subawardee or prime federal recipient at the initiation or receipt of covered federal action or a material change to previous filing pursuant to tale 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. The filing of a fomt is required for such payment or agreement to make payment to lobbying entity for influencing or anempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress an officer or employee of Congress or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with a covered federal action. Attach a continuation sheet for additional information if the space on the forth is inadequate. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and materiel change report Refer to the implementing guidance published by the Office of Mamagemeil and Budget for additional information. I. Identify the type of covered federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to influence, the outcome of a covered federal action. 2. Identify the status of the covered federal action. 3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a follow-up report caused by a material change to the information previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the charge occurred. Enter the date of the last, previously submitted report by this reporting entity for this towered federal action 4. Enter the fall name, address, city, state and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District if known. Check the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is or expects to be a prime or sabaward recipient. Identify the tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the fast tier. Subawards include but are not limited to subcontracts, subgmns and contract awards under grants. 5. If the organization fling the report in Item 4. checks "Suhawardee' then enter die fun name, address, city, State and zip code of the prime federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known. 6. Enter the name of the federal agency making the award or loan commitment Include at least one organization level below agency name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United Sores Coast Guard. 7. Enter the fedeal program name or description for the covered federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, bans and khan commitments 8. Enter the most appropriate federal identifying number available for the federal action identification in item 1 (e.g., Regeest for Proposal (RFP) number, Invitation for Bid (IFB) number, grant announcement number, the contract tartan. or ban award member, the application/proposal control member assigned by the federal agency). Include prefixes, e.g., "REP-DE-90-001." 9. For a covered federal action when there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the federal amount of the awardgoan committee -am for Ibe prime entity identified in hem 4 or 5. 10. (a) Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the lobbying entity engaged by the reporting entity identified in Item 4. to influenced she covered federal action. (b) Enter the full names of the individual(s) performing services and include full address if different from 10 (a). Enter last Name, First Name and Middle Initial (MI). 11. Enter the amount of compensation paid or reasonably expected to be paid by the tepurting entity (Item 4) to the lobbying entity (item 10). Indicate whether the payment has been made (actual) or will be made (planned). Check all boxes that apply. If this is a material change repot, enter the cumulative amount of payment made or planned to be mnde. 12. Check the appropriate beiges). Check a0 boxes that apply. If payment is made through an in -kind contributiwh, specify the nature and value of the in -kind payment. 13. Check the appropriate beiges). Check a0 boxes that apply. If other, specify nature. 14.Provide a specific and detailed description of the services that the lobbyist has performed or will be expected to perform and the date(s) of any services rendered. Include all preparatory and related activity maned time spent in aced contact with federal officials. Identify the federal officer(s) or employees) contacted or the officer(s) employee(s) or Member(s) of Congress that were contacted. 15. Check whether or not a continuation sheet(s) is attached. 16. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, print his/her name title and telephoac number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30-minutes per response, including time for reviewing insauet(on, searching existing data sonars, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collation of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget. Papetwork Reduction Project (0348-0046), Washington, D.C. 20503. SIP-LLL-Insmutira Rey. 0604-90eENOTw -Page 10-72 May 1, 2006 RVPUB\HSHANE\772641.1 Exhibit J-3 LPP 06-02 • 286 • AGENDA ITEM 8K • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 14, 2010 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Commercial Advertising Policy and Content Guidelines, Use Policy, and Non -Commercial Free Speech Policy Incidental BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt a Commercial Advertising Policy and Content Guidelines, and Incidental Use Policy; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 10-011, "A Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Adopting a Commercial Advertising Policy and Content Guidelines, an incidental Use Policy Covering Concession Stands, Merchandising, and Contractor Services for Commission -Owned Facilities and Property and a Revised Non -Commercial Free Speech Permit Policy". BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission currently owns and operates five Metrolink stations. Contrasted against other member agencies within Metrolink, the Commission is unique in its ownership of its stations. Stations are typically owned by the municipality in which they are located. With ownership come requirements for station maintenance, safety/security, utilities, and upgrades. In a declining revenue environment and with the increasing age of the Commission's stations, the costs for station operations and maintenance have increased and become more noticeable. In its ongoing efforts to optimize revenue to offset maintenance and operating costs, staff has developed a commercial advertising policy and will consider potential strategies to develop a revenue -generating advertising program. In 2003, the Commission took action to grant authority to the Executive Director to establish policies affecting rail station operations. Given the importance and sensitivity of this subject, review and consideration of this policy by the Commission is needed and appropriate as this policy revision constitutes a Agenda Item 8K 287 significant change from the Commission's historic approach to generating commercial revenue from station properties. Any future action to implement advertising at the stations would also return to the Commission for approval and consideration. As a precursor to any such action, staff, in consultation with legal counsel, is recommending adoption of Resolution No. 10-011 and corresponding exhibits. Specifically, staff proposes a formal policy and guidelines to evaluate commercial advertising as shown in Exhibit A. Based on a review of federal regulations and guidance concerning incidental use of federally funded facilities, staff proposes a policy governing use of station properties to generate additional revenue through additional compatible uses as shown in Exhibit B. Incidental use refers to concession revenue from food sales, news racks, or other minor sources. Finally staff recommends adoption of a formal non-commercial free speech policy as shown in Exhibit C. Attachment: Resolution No. 10-011 Agenda Item 8K • 288 • RESOLUTION NO. 10-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADOPTING A COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING POLICY AND CONTENT GUIDELINES; AN INCIDENTAL USE POLICY COVERING CONCESSION STANDS, MERCHANDISING AND INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS FOR COMMISSION OWNED FACILITIES AND PROPERTY; AND A REVISED NON-COMMERCIAL FREE SPEECH PERMIT POLICY WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Commission") owns real property, provides bus and commuter rail service throughout Riverside County and currently operates the following five commuter rail stations: (1) Downtown Riverside Station; (2) Pedley Station; (3) La Sierra Station; (4) West Corona Station; and (5) North Main Corona Station; and WHEREAS, Commission has designated certain spaces in its commuter rail stations for non-commercial free speech purposes, while other spaces are appropriate for incidental uses of its real property including commercial advertising and other revenue generating purposes; and WHEREAS, for those spaces that have been authorized as non-commercial free speech zones —all leafleting, solicitation and political campaign activities shall be conducted by permit and in accordance with this Policy; and WHEREAS, Commission has adopted reasonable permit requirements to ensure that the number and location of people involved in such leafleting, solicitation and/or political campaign activities at each station do not impede, limit or restrict optimum pedestrian traffic or intended public transportation uses of its commuter rail stations; and WHEREAS, for those spaces that have been authorized for commercial advertising and other revenue -generating uses, such incidental uses shall be allowed only so long as the following interests of Commission are preserved: (1) a safe, convenient and pleasant environment for users of Commission property, which includes maximizing use of its commuter rail stations by attracting and maintaining the patronage of the public; (2) protection of any minors who use Commission stations; and (3) the avoidance of any potential identification of the Commission with the point of view or message of the commercial advertisement placed by a third party; and WHEREAS, the Commission has further identified potential additional revenues sources beyond commercial advertising such as concessions and Commission -related merchandising programs to supplement existing operational and capital funds; and WHEREAS, these new programs are intended to supplement existing revenues generated from current fare rates and non -operating subsidies; and 289 WHEREAS, this Policy authorizes the Executive Director to implement any reasonable time, place, manner restrictions necessary to maintain public safety, aesthetic standards and the promotion of public transportation; and WHEREAS, the Commission adopts the viewpoint neutral and content -based commercial advertising guidelines as contained herein in order to provide direction to third parties seeking to use the Commission's designated advertising spaces; and WHEREAS, by adopting these guidelines, the Commission does not intend or propose to permit advertising that individually or commercially would cause any real or personal property owned or controlled by Commission to become a public forum for the dissemination, debate, and/or discussion of public issues unless permitted under the Commission's non-commercial free speech policy; and WHEREAS, the commercial advertising policy applies to advertising placed by a third party on any Commission property and does not prohibit the Commission from placing advertisements and announcements related to its own or other governmental services, programs, or events not in violation of the viewpoint neutral content -based restrictions contained herein; and WHEREAS, the sale of newspapers, food and beverages shall be regulated under separate policies. The sale of non -Commission merchandise except for approved concession vendors is strictly prohibited at the commuter rail stations; and WHEREAS, any advertising on bus shelters and benches within the public rights -of -way shall be governed by the then -current policies of the applicable jurisdiction. This Policy shall only apply to Commission owned real property and otherwise the commuter rail stations above. WHEREAS, the following Policy and Guidelines will be reviewed biennially (every two years) to reflect the current policies of the Commission and to reflect changes in the trends of social and economic acceptance and appropriateness of various forms of advertising and concessions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners as follows: Section 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this resolution by this reference. Section 2. Commission hereby adopts a "Commercial Advertising Policy and Guidelines" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. Commission hereby adopts a "Incidental Use Policy" attached hereto as Exhibit `B" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. Commission hereby adopts a "Non -Commercial Free Speech Policy" attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by reference. • • 290 • Section 5. Commission reserves the right to modify both Exhibits A, B and/or C at any time as may be required. Commission hereby authorizes the Executive Director to revise and enforce the provisions of both policies. Commission staff shall post revisions to either Policy on Commission's website at least thirty (30) calendar days before it becomes effective. Section 6. The Chairperson of the Board shall sign this Resolution and the Clerk of the Board shall certify the adoption thereof. This Resolution shall be effective on the date of its adoption. Section 7. The Board of Commissioners hereby finds that adoption of this Resolution is not subject to CEQA and authorizes and directs Commission staff as designated by the Executive Director to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of Riverside County and the State Clearinghouse within five (5) days following adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July, 2010. Bob Buster, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission • ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 291 • EXHIBIT "A" COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING POLICY AND CONTENT GUIDELINES A. POLICY STATEMENT The purpose of this Commercial Advertising Policy is to establish viewpoint -neutral and content -based guidelines that govern Commission's display of acceptable commercial advertisements. The display of commercial advertising is not intended to provide a general public forum for free speech purposes but rather to retain use of Commission property in a proprietary capacity. Allowing commercial advertising in certain locations on Commission property as a means of fee generation is a responsible incidental economic use of Commission's capital investments. Advertising placed by any third party (including vendors) on Commission property is not authorized unless permitted in accordance with this Policy and guidelines and a contract approved by the Commission. Issuance of any license agreements and related contracts must be in accordance with Commission's procurement policies. Commission reserves the right to reject any advertising based upon its guidelines for acceptable advertising content as outlined in this Policy. Locations for commercial advertising may include but are not limited to: commuter rail stations, parking structures, and fixed outdoor displays on any Commission -owned property. This Policy also provides guidelines as to the use of information signage space. Notwithstanding, Commission recognizes that advertising on its own properties is a critical means of communication with its patrons and users —including the adequate dissemination of transit and safety related information. Some informational signage space is currently available at the stations and reserved exclusively for Commission information. B. DEFINITION OF TERMS Key terms are defined as follows: • "Added Value Materials" - Informational advertising which offers a tangible benefit to patrons as a means of rewarding and retaining customers (i.e., a money - saving discount). • "Commercial advertisements" - Advertisements that (1) have as its primary purpose the promotion of a commercial transaction, such as the sale of real or personal property, services, entertaining and/or dining, which is offered to the public generally and (2) are not otherwise prohibited under the viewpoint neutral content -based restrictions below. Such shall include services and messages of charitable, educational, government, and not for profit institutions subject to compliance with the Commercial Advertising Content Guidelines. • "Cross -Promotion" - A cooperative partnership in which two or more entities work together with the goal of jointly promoting their respective services. 292 • "Governmental Entities" - Public entities specifically created by government action. • "Map Cases" - Fixed cases in Commission Rail stations. Used to display Commission Rail System Maps and provide information on fares, routes, safety, sales locations, service changes and other matters relevant to the use of the Metrolink System. • "Non -Commercial Advertising" - A public service announcement, event notification, political statement or other message which does not have as its primary purpose to propose a commercial transaction. These types of advertisements that otherwise deviate from the Commercial Advertising Content Guidelines will not be accepted. C. COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING CONTENT GUIDELINES 1. Revenue-Generating/Commercial Advertising In accordance with the revenue -generating purpose of this Policy, the Commission shall accept only commercial advertisements. Non-commercial advertisements will not be accepted unless it is considered informational material as described below. Any person seeking to advertise, leaflet or solicit for political purposes are not covered by this Policy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Commission expressly reserves its proprietary right to display notices and advertisements relating to Commission's transit operations. The Commission may, but is not required, to contract with outside vendors to sell and display commercial advertising within the commuter rail stations and otherwise on its property for the sole purpose of generating revenue. Commission may sell or post advertising directly. Any vendors responsible for soliciting and posting commercial advertisements to third parties shall be authorized under contracts awarded by Commission through a competitive bidding process to the extent required under the Commission's procurement policy. All such contracts shall comply with these guidelines and following requirements: • Locations for commercial advertising on Commission property or rail right of way may include, but are not limited to: dedicated map cases, billboards, banners, bike lockers, vending machine shelters, fixed outdoor displays, electronic signage, and any other locations approved by the Commission. • Safety, aesthetic considerations, customer convenience, and Commission's need to convey transit -related and emergency information to passengers will take precedence over revenue generation. • Quantity, quality, and placement of all advertising will be controlled by and subject to the specific approval of Commission. 293 • • • Commission reserves the right to review any proposed advertisement in advance and reject any proposed advertisement which does not meet the Commission's standards as set forth in this Policy. Each entity wishing to purchase advertising space shall submit an application in such form as approved by the Executive Director or his/ her designee, which shall include the proposed content of the advertisement. Such shall not prohibit contracting the sale and management of such advertising space to a third party pursuant to Commission's procurement policies and procedures. Before any advertisement is rejected, it shall be referred to the Executive Director or his/her designee for Commission for appropriate action and a final decision. The following viewpoint -neutral content -based limitations for third party commercial advertising are established as follows: 2. Alcohol and Tobacco Advertising Advertising of all alcohol and tobacco products is prohibited. 3. Non -Commercial Advertising Commission does not accept advertising from non -governmental entities if the subject matter and intent of said advertising is non-commercial and deviates from these guidelines. Generally, acceptable advertising must promote for sale, lease or other form of financial benefit a product, service, event or other property interest in primarily a commercial manner for primarily a commercial purpose. Exemption: Governmental entities, meaning public entities specifically created by government action, may purchase or negotiate arrangements for advertising space for messages that advance specific government purposes. It is Commission's intent that government advertising will not be used for comment on issues of valid public debate. 4. Other Subiect Matter Restrictions Advertising may not be displayed if its content: Promotes, condones or relates to an illegal activity or which might be considered as derogatory toward any aspect of the law enforcement profession; or • Contains language which is obscene, vulgar, profane, or otherwise offensive to generally accepted sensibility and taste; or • Contains images, copy or concepts that actively denigrate or discriminate against a religious, ethnic, racial, sexual orientation, gender identity, or political group; • Contains images, copy or concepts that actively denigrate public transportation; or 294 • Contains obscene matter as defined in state law, or sex -oriented material as defined in the Riverside County Municipal Code, Chapter 5.44; or • Contains images, copy or concepts that appear to make a personal attack on any individual or upon any company, product, or institution; or falsely disparages any service or product or is defamatory in any respect; or • Contains images, copy or concepts that portrays acts of violence, murder, sedition, terror, antisocial behavior, vandalism, or other acts of violence against persons and/or institutions; or • Contains images, copy or concepts that depict nudity or portions of nudity that would be considered as offensive, distasteful, pornographic, or erotic, is obscene, or advertises adult entertainment. The rule of "public acceptance" should be used in such cases; i.e., if the advertisement has already gained public acceptance, then it may be considered as acceptable to Commission; or • Contains images, copy or concepts that contains political ads endorsing a candidate, measure or proposition; or • Contains images, copy or concepts that contains a religious message or promotes any religion; or • Contains images, copy or concepts that implies an endorsement by Commission for any service, product or point of view; or • Contains images, copy or concepts that are in conflict with any applicable federal, state, or local law, statute, or ordinance. 5. Display, Treatment and Maintenance Requirements Advertising must comply with the following: • Advertising placement or treatments will not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic, will not restrict the visibility of directional/traffic signs and informational material, and will not encroach on necessary sight lines (e.g., driver/operator view of waiting patrons) nor present any other safety risks or hazards. • Advertising industry standard sizes will be used for all advertising treatments. • Advertising treatments will be maintained in "like -new" condition. Damage to the advertisement or its housing will be corrected within forty-eight (48) hours. • Advertising treatments (housings) will complement the architecture of the transit centers/stations and the flavor of the surrounding community. Commission plan specifications will be followed wherever applicable. Advertising treatments will • 295 • • be designed, constructed, and placed in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal standards. • Any unsold transit center, major transit points, and station display advertising space will be allocated for graphics and/or nonrevenue-producing functions approved by the Executive Director or his/her designee. At least one full display panel per transit center and station will be reserved exclusively for transit -related items. • Advertising space may be allowed in printed materials (e.g., timetables, maps, and informational brochures) at the discretion of the Executive Director or his/her designee. • No advertising space shall supersede necessary transit information and/or regulations. • At the discretion of the Executive Director or his/her designee, Commission may allocate space in printed materials to inform transit customers about private entities actively participating in trans services, e.g., pass and ticket -sales outlets. • Advertising vendors shall maintain all commercial advertising for which they have contracted to display on Commission properties. 6. Commission's Right of Rejection The Commission reserves the right to reject any advertisement on the stated grounds as set forth in these Guidelines. Any advertisement or other display deemed to be objectionable will be removed. No refund shall be made for the time such objectionable material was on display. Commission's vendors may review advertising content according to their own guidelines of acceptability and generally Commission will not screen individual ads submitted to its vendors prior to posting unless specifically requested to do so by vendors. Nevertheless, in all advertising vendor contracts awarded, Commission reserves the right to reject any advertising content submitted for display on its properties and/or to order the removal of any advertising posted on its properties. Decisions regarding the rejection or removal of advertising shall be made by the Executive Director or his/her designee based upon the criteria in these Guidelines. 296 7. Informational Advertising Commission has several unique distribution channels at its disposal for disseminating transit information that incurs no "space" cost (no fee charged for advertising space). These distribution channels include, but are not limited to: newsletter racks at Commission stations, bulletin boards and cases at select Commission Rail stations. In addition, Commission shall have use of an allotment of advertising space at no charge by agreement with any vendor that sells all remaining advertising space under revenue generating agreements. • Acceptable information for these distribution channels is categorized as follows: a. Regular Transit Information Regular transit -oriented information is prepared by Commission and operators as well as upon request from other internal departments. Regular transit information includes, but is not limited to: service features and changes, fare information and changes, safety and security messages, maps and explanations of related transportation services. b. Cross -Promotional Information On an occasional basis and only when space