HomeMy Public PortalAbout06 June 27, 2011 Budget & implementationRECORDS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
MEETING AGENDA
TIME: 9:30 a.m.
DATE: Monday, June 27, 2011
LOCATION: BOARD ROOM
County of Riverside Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside
SP. COMMITTEE MEMBERS rs,
Scott Matas, Chair / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs
Ron Roberts, Vice Chair / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula
Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont
Ella Zanowic / Jeff Hewitt, City of Calimesa
Mary Craton / Barry Talbot, City of Canyon Lake
Greg Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City
Steven Hernandez / Eduardo Garcia, City of Coachella
Larry Smith / Robert Youssef, City of Hemet
Douglas Hanson / Patrick Mullany, City of Indian Wells
Bob Magee / Melissa Melendez, City of Lake Elsinore
Rick Gibbs / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta
Scott Hines / Gordon Moller, City of Rancho Mirage
Steve Adams / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside
John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside, District II
Jeff Stone, County of Riverside, District III
49. STAFF 'V
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer
4P. AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY aoe
Annual Budget Development and Oversight
Competitive Federal and State Grant Programs
Countywide Communications and Outreach Programs
Countywide Strategic Plan
Legislation
Public Communications and Outreach Programs
Short Range Transit Plans
Comments are welcomed by the Committee. if you wish to provide comments to the Committee please
complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board.
11.36.06
Tara Byerly
From: Tara Byerly
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 3:00 PM
To: Tara Byerly
Subject: RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Agenda - !Pad Users
Importance: High
Good Afternoon Budget and Implementation Committee Members:
The June Budget and Implementation Committee Agenda for IPad User is available. Please copy the link
below: http://www.rctc.org/downloads/BIC/ipad _budgetandimplementation.pdf
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Respectfully,
Tara S. Byerly
Senior Administrative Assistant
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 787-7141
1
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
B U D G E T A N D I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O M M I T T E E
w w w . r c t c . o r g
A G E N D A *
* A c t i o n s m a y b e t a k e n o n a n y i t e m l i s t e d o n t h e a g e n d a
9 : 3 0 a . m .
M o n d a y , J u n e 2 7 , 2 0 1 1
B O A R D R O O M
C o u n t y A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C e n t e r
4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , F i r s t F l o o r
R i v e r s i d e , C a l i f o r n i a
I n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e B r o w n A c t a n d G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 5 4 9 5 7 . 5 , a g e n d a m a t e r i a l s
d i s t r i b u t e d 7 2 h o u r s p r i o r t o t h e m e e t i n g , . w h i c h a r e p u b l i c r e c o r d s r e l a t i n g t o o p e n s e s s i o n
a g e n d a i t e m s , w i l l b e a v a i l a b l e f o r i n s p e c t i o n b y m e m b e r s o f t h e p u b l i c p r i o r t o t h e m e e t i n g
a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n o f f i c e , 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , T h i r d F l o o r , R i v e r s i d e , C A , a n d o n t h e
C o m m i s s i o n ' s w e b s i t e , w w w . r c t c . o r q .
I n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e A m e r i c a n s w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s A c t a n d G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n
5 4 9 5 4 . 2 , i f y o u n e e d s p e c i a l a s s i s t a n c e t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n a C o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g , p l e a s e
c o n t a c t t h e C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d a t ( 9 5 1 ) 7 8 7 - 7 1 4 1 . N o t i f i c a t i o n o f a t l e a s t 4 8 h o u r s p r i o r t o
m e e t i n g t i m e w i l l a s s i s t s t a f f i n a s s u r i n g t h a t r e a s o n a b l e a r r a n g e m e n t s c a n b e m a d e t o
p r o v i d e a c c e s s i b i l i t y a t t h e m e e t i n g .
1 . C A L L T O O R D E R
2 . P L E D G E O F A L L E G I A N C E
3 . R O L L C A L L
4 . P U B L I C C O M M E N T S - E a c h i n d i v i d u a l s p e a k e r i s l i m i t e d t o s p e a k t h r e e ( 3 )
c o n t i n u o u s m i n u t e s o r l e s s . T h e C o m m i t t e e m a y , e i t h e r a t t h e d i r e c t i o n o f t h e
C h a i r o r b y m a j o r i t y v o t e o f t h e C o m m i t t e e , w a i v e t h i s t h r e e m i n u t e t i m e
l i m i t a t i o n . D e p e n d i n g o n t h e n u m b e r o f i t e m s o n t h e A g e n d a a n d t h e n u m b e r
o f s p e a k e r s , t h e C h a i r m a y , a t h i s / h e r d i s c r e t i o n , r e d u c e t h e t i m e o f e a c h
s p e a k e r t o t w o ( 2 ) c o n t i n u o u s m i n u t e s . A l s o , t h e C o m m i t t e e m a y t e r m i n a t e
p u b l i c c o m m e n t s i f s u c h c o m m e n t s b e c o m e r e p e t i t i o u s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e
m a x i m u m t i m e f o r p u b l i c c o m m e n t f o r a n y i n d i v i d u a l i t e m o r t o p i c i s t h i r t y ( 3 0 )
m i n u t e s . S p e a k e r s m a y n o t y i e l d t h e i r t i m e t o o t h e r s w i t h o u t t h e c o n s e n t o f
t h e C h a i r . A n y w r i t t e n d o c u m e n t s t o b e d i s t r i b u t e d o r p r e s e n t e d t o t h e
C o m m i t t e e s h a l l b e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d . T h i s p o l i c y a p p l i e s t o
P u b l i c C o m m e n t s a n d c o m m e n t s o n A g e n d a I t e m s .
Budget and Implementation Committee
June 27, 2011
Page 2
Under the Brown Act, the Board should not take action on or discuss matters •
raised during public comment portion of the agenda which are not listed on the
agenda. Board members may refer such matters to staff for factual
information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 23, 2011
6.
7.
ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add an item to the Agenda after
making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and
that the item came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to the
posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires
2/3 vote of the Committee. if there are less than 2/3 of the Committee
members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote.
Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.)
AMENDMENT TO STANDBY BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENTS RELATED TO
THE 2009 BONDS
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
Page 1
1) Receive and file a report on the proposed amendments, including the Fee
Letter, to each of the three Standby Bond Purchase Agreements (SBPAs)
between the Riverside County Transportation Commission and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, National Association (JPMorgan), as liquidity facility
provider;
2) Adopt Resolution No. 1 1-010, "Resolution Authorizing the Release of All
or a Portion of the Debt Service Reserve Fund Related to the Riverside
County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited
Tax Bonds) 2009 Series A, B, and C, the Execution and Delivery of a
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, an Offering Memorandum, and the
Taking of All Other Actions Necessary in Connection Therewith";
3) Approve the estimated costs to be incurred in connection with the
amendments to be paid from 2009 Measure A Bond Financing Program
funds and the execution of related agreements, as required; and
4) Forward to the Commission for final action.
"
"
"
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
J u n e 2 7 , 2 0 1 1
P a g e 3
8 . F I S C A L Y E A R S 2 0 1 2 - 1 6 M E A S U R E A F I V E - Y E A R C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T
P L A N S F O R L O C A L S T R E E T S A N D R O A D S
O v e r v i e w
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
P a g e 2 1
1 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y s 2 0 1 2 - 1 6 M e a s u r e A F i v e - Y e a r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t
P l a n s ( C I P ) f o r L o c a l S t r e e t s a n d R o a d s a s s u b m i t t e d ; a n d
2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
9 . 2 0 0 9 M E A S U R E A P R O G R A M M A I N T E N A N C E O F E F F O R T
O v e r v i e w
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
P a g e 2 3
1 ) A p p r o v e t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A M a i n t e n a n c e o f E f f o r t ( M O E ) b a s e y e a r
l e v e l s f o r e a c h l o c a l a g e n c y ;
2 ) A p p r o v e t h e c i t y o f R i v e r s i d e ' s ( R i v e r s i d e ) r e q u e s t f o r s p e c i a l
c o n s i d e r a t i o n r e g a r d i n g i t s 2 0 0 9 M O E b a s e y e a r l e v e l ; a n d
2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
1 0 . R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S I T S E R V I C E S F U N D I N G A L L O C A T I O N F O R F I S C A L
Y E A R 2 0 1 1 / 1 2
O v e r v i e w
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
P a g e 3 0
1 ) C o n d u c t a p u b l i c h e a r i n g a t t h e J u l y C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g o n t h e
p r o p o s e d S e c t i o n 5 3 0 7 P r o g r a m o f P r o j e c t s ( P O P ) ;
2 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 F e d e r a l T r a n s i t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ' s ( F T A ) S e c t i o n
5 3 0 7 a n d 5 3 1 1 P O P f o r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ;
3 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 L o c a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n F u n d ( L T F ) a n d S t a t e
T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e ( S T A ) f u n d a l l o c a t i o n s f o r t r a n s i t ;
4 ) D i r e c t s t a f f t o a d d p r o j e c t s i n t o t h e R e g i o n a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t
P l a n ( R T I P ) ;
5 ) A d o p t R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 1 - 0 1 1 , " R e s o l u t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n t o A l l o c a t e S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e F u n d s " ;
a n d
6 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
Budget and Implementation Committee
June 27, 2011
Page 4
11. FISCAL YEAR 2009/10 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
Page 48
1) Receive and file the transit operators' compliance status report for the
FY 2009/10 Productivity Improvement Program (PIP); and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
12. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
Page 59
1) Grant the city of Temecula (Temecula) an extension to June 30, 2012,
for SB 821 program funds approved for the Santa Gertrudis Creek
Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Overcrossing project; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
13. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Receive an update on state and federal legislation;
2) Adopt the following bill positions:
a) SB 446 (Dutton) - Support;
b) HR 1825 (Blumenauer) - Support;
c) S. 1034 (Schumer) - Support; and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
14. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT
Overview
Page 67
This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report
on attended and upcoming meeting/conferences and issues related to
Commission activities.
•
•
•
Budget and Implementation Committee
June 27, 2011
Page 5
• 15. ADJOURNMENT AND NEXT MEETING
The next budget and Implementation Committee meeting is scheduled to be
held at 9:30 a.m., Monday, July 25, 2011, Board Chambers, First Floor,
County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside.
•
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE SIGN -IN SHEET
JUNE 27, 2011
NAME
AGENCY
E MAIL ADDRESS
.-14y, -S1911C114
g,rUvyr____„„7,
7�,v`Qi/�'
�� t-v e�x.�r
1 v ee s ► A.c'
At WItrt
! 1.44' cal-4
`/�R, J
('n'7
G L. /-1 G-.Fl.w eft.,...,,..:�-
-2 r .L.-�S,el
E-1-L.4... 4 t'e /a-ni_. 4s.4,
a(X674
0A—,ti-C-0 ILAlC417
R„ IS
IZ,7..-t. 667d,.1.,
d3 s,b vrn
�Crs..1 �cn>zS:
\ten fT
1�1vn6� �nS�nca cam,
�n�rc.n V V r��1 )s
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
ROLL CALL
JUNE 27, 2011
County of Riverside, District II
County of Riverside, District III
City of Beaumont
City of Calimesa
City of Canyon Lake
City of Cathedral City
City of Coachella
City of Desert Hot Springs
Present
a
Absent
a
a
a
a
a
a
City of Hemet
a
City of Indian Wells
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Murrieta
City of Rancho Mirage
City of Riverside
City of Temecula
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
B U D G E T A N D I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O M M I T T E E
M o n d a y , M a y 2 3 , 2 0 1 1
M I N U T E S
1 . C A L L T O O R D E R
T h e m e e t i n g o f t h e B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e w a s c a l l e d t o
o r d e r b y V i c e C h a i r R o n R o b e r t s a t 9 : 3 5 a . m . , i n t h e B o a r d R o o m a t t h e
C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C e n t e r , 4 0 8 0 L e m o n S t r e e t , F i r s t F l o o r ,
R i v e r s i d e , C a l i f o r n i a , 9 2 5 0 1 .
2 . P L E D G E O F A L L E G I A N C E
A t t h i s t i m e , C o m m i s s i o n e r R i c k G i b b s l e d t h e B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n
C o m m i t t e e i n a f l a g s a l u t e .
3 . R O L L C A L L
M e m b e r s / A l t e r n a t e s P r e s e n t M e m b e r s A b s e n t
S t e v e A d a m s
R o g e r B e r g
M a r y C r a t o n
R i c k G i b b s
D o u g l a s H a n s o n
S t e v e n H e r n a n d e z
B o b M a g e e
R o n R o b e r t s
L a r r y S m i t h
E l l a Z a n o w i c
S c o t t H i n e s
S c o t t M a t a s
G r e g P e t t i s
J e f f S t o n e
J o h n T a v a g l i o n e
4 . P U B L I C C O M M E N T S
T h e r e w e r e n o r e q u e s t s t o s p e a k f r o m t h e p u b l i c .
5 . A P P R O V A L O F M I N U T E S - A P R I L 2 5 , 2 0 1 1
M / S / C ( C r a t o n / S m i t h ) t o a p p r o v e t h e m i n u t e s a s s u b m i t t e d .
A b s t a i n : H e r n a n d e z
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
May 23, 2011
Page 2
6. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS
There were no additions/revisions to the agenda.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be
approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate
action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be
placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.
M/S/C (Craton/Zanowic) to approve the following Consent Calendar
item(s):
7A. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1) Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the
period ended March 31, 201 1;
2) Approve a budget adjustment to decrease debt proceeds by
$15 million, decrease debt service interest expenditures by
$1 million, and increase debt service principal expenditures by
$17,284,000 for a net increase in FY 2010/11 expenditures of
$1,284,000; and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
7B. APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 /12
1) Approve Resolution No. 1 1-009, Resolution of the Riverside
County Transportation Commission Establishing the
Commission's Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2011/12";
and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
7C. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS
1) Receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 4 (Q4) 2010;
and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
7D. FUND BALANCE POLICY
1) Adopt Resolution No. 1 -1-007, !Resolution of the Riverside
County Transportation Commission Regarding the Fund Balance
Policy'; and
2) Adopt the Fund Balance Policy; and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
May 23, 2011
Page 3
7E. FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 MINIMUM FARE REVENUE RATIO FOR
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY AND SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY
1) Reaffirm the methodology used to calculate the required fare
box recovery ratio;
2) Approve the FY 2011 /12 minimum fare revenue to operating
cost ratio of 17.04% for the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA)
and 17.80% for the SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine); and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
8. PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12
Michele Cisneros, Accounting and Human Resources Manager, presented the
proposed Budget for FY 2011 /12, and discussed the following areas:
• Budget adjustments;
• Budget summary;
• Funding sources and comparison;
• Summary of uses;
• Management services;
• Regional programs;
• Capital program uses;
• Capital projects and operations expenditures;
• Capital project and expenditure highlights;
• Functional uses breakdown;
• Measure A management services; and
• Next steps.
Commissioner Steve Adams asked if the California Transportation Commission
(CTC) does not approve the funding allocation for the State Route 91 high
occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane project and the Transportation Infrastructure
Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan is not received for the SR-91 Corridor
Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), will existing funds be redirected to other
projects or be maintained.
Anne Mayer stated that while the CTC deferred allocating funds, the majority
of the funding for the SR-91 HOV lane project comes from the Corridor
Mobility Improvement Account. As for the SR-91 CIP, the funds being
expended are related to preliminary engineering, completing the environmental
document, and setting up the procurement process. The TIFIA loan will trigger
the release of the request for proposal to select a design -build firm. Therefore,
existing funds will be maintained.
•
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
May 23, 2011
Page 4
Theresia Trevino stated the expenditures in the budget for the SR-91 HOV
lanes are primarily for the right of way acquisition.
Commissioner Ron Roberts requested an update for the Perris Valley Line (PVL)
project.
Anne Mayer stated for the PVL project the largest single source of funding is
$75 million from the federal Small Starts program. She explained
environmental approval of the PVL project is required, and then there is a
several month process with the Federal Transit Administration before receiving
authorization to use the funds. Additionally, there is $56 million in the State
Transportation Improvement Program funds with the balance of the funding
comprised of grant funds and other federal funds.
M/S/C (Gibbs2anowic) to:
1) Receive input on the proposed Budget for FY 2011 /12;
2) Close the public hearing to receive input . on the proposed
Budget for FY 2011 /12 at the June 8 Commission meeting;
3) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2011/12; and
4) Forward to the Commission for final action.
9. FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2009/10 - 2010/11 FEDERAL TRANSIT
ADMINISTRATION'S SECTION 5310 CAPITAL GRANT APPLICATIONS
Fina Clemente, Transit Manager, provided an overview for the FFYs 2009/10 -
2010/1 1 FTA's Section 5310 Capital grant applications.
M/S/C (Adams2anowic) to:
1) Adopt the FFYs 2009/10 - 2010/11 federal Transit
Administration's (FTA) Section 5310 Riverside County project
rankings as recommended by the local review committee (LRC);
2) Adopt Resolution No. 11-008, 'Resolution of the Riverside
County Transportation Commission Certifying Project
Consistency with Regional Transportation Plan'; certifying that
the projects are derived from a locally developed, coordinated
public transit -human services transportation plan;
3) Include the projects in the Regional Transportation Improvement
Plan (RTIP); and
4) Forward to the Commission for final action.
•
"
R C T C B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e M i n u t e s
M a y 2 3 , 2 0 1 1
P a g e 5
1 0 . F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 S B 8 2 1 B I C Y C L E A N D P E D E S T R I A N F A C I L I T I E S
P R O G R A M F U N D I N G R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S
B r i a n C u n a n a n , C o m m u t e r A s s i s t a n c e M a n a g e r , p r e s e n t e d t h e F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2
S B 8 2 1 B i c y c l e a n d P e d e s t r i a n F a c i l i t i e s p r o g r a m f u n d i n g r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s .
C o m m i s s i o n e r B o b M a g e e e x p r e s s e d t h e i m p o r t a n c e o f t h i s p r o g r a m a s i t
b r i n g s f u n d i n g t o c o m m u n i t i e s a n d c r e a t e s s i g n i f i c a n t i m p r o v e m e n t s . H e
e n c o u r a g e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n e r s t o h a v e t h e i r p u b l i c w o r k s p r o f e s s i o n a l s
a n n u a l l y p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h i s p r o g r a m a n d s e e k g u i d a n c e f r o m C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f
r e g a r d i n g t h e S B 8 2 1 e v a l u a t i o n c r i t e r i a . H e c o n g r a t u l a t e d t h e c i t y o f
W i l d o m a r f o r r e c e i v i n g S B 8 2 1 f u n d i n g f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .
C o m m i s s i o n e r R o g e r B e r g e x p r e s s e d h i s c o n c e r n t h a t b i c y c l e p r o j e c t s s h o u l d
r e c e i v e a n e q u a l s h a r e o f S B 8 2 1 f u n d i n g . H e s u g g e s t e d r e e v a l u a t i n g t h e
c r i t e r i a t o e n s u r e b i c y c l e l a n e p r o j e c t s a r e f a i r l y w e i g h t e d .
M / S / C ( M a g e e / A d a m s ) t o :
1 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 S B 8 2 1 B i c y c l e a n d P e d e s t r i a n
F a c i l i t i e s P r o g r a m r e c o m m e n d e d f u n d i n g o f $ 1 , 0 9 4 , 1 4 3 ;
2 ) A u t h o r i z e s t a f f t o f u n d u n f u n d e d p r o j e c t s i n r a n k o r d e r t h r o u g h
t h e 7 0 ' p e r c e n t i l e u s i n g p r o j e c t s a v i n g s a n d r e t u m e d
a l l o c a t i o n s ; a n d
3 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
1 1 . G R A P H I C D E S I G N A N D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S E R V I C E S
T a n y a L o v e , G o o d s M o v e m e n t M a n a g e r , p r o v i d e d a n o v e r v i e w o f t h e
p r o c u r e m e n t p r o c e s s a n d s c o p e o f s e r v i c e s f o r t h e g r a p h i c d e s i g n a n d
c o m m u n i c a t i o n s e r v i c e s a g r e e m e n t .
M / S / C ( A d a m s / G i b b s ) t o :
1 ) A w a r d A g r e e m e n t N o . 1 1 - 1 5 - 0 6 7 - 0 0 t o G e o g r a p h i c s f o r t h e
p r o v i s i o n o f g r a p h i c d e s i g n a n d c o m m u n i c a t i o n s s e r v i c e s o n a n
a s - n e e d e d , t i m e a n d e x p e n s e b a s i s , p u r s u a n t t o i t s p r o p o s e d
f i x e d u n i t r a t e s , f o r a t w o - y e a r t e r m , a n d t w o o n e - y e a r o p t i o n s
t o e x t e n d t h e a g r e e m e n t , i n a n a m o u n t n o t t o e x c e e d
$ 1 m i l l i o n ;
2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r , p u r s u a n t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o
e x e c u t e t h e a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d
3 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
May 23, 2011
Page 6
12. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager, provided an overview of federal
and state legislative activities and presented five bills and the recommended
bill positions.
Anne Mayer requested the Committee approve an additional staff
recommendation to authorize the Executive Director to modify or
communicate changes, as necessary, to a bill position on pending legislation
consistent with the Commission's approved legislative platform and explained
the necessity for this flexibility.
M/S/C (Magee/Smith) to:
1) Receive an update on state and federal legislation;
2) Adopt the following state bill positions:
• AB 1229 (Feuer) - Support;
• SB 545 (Anderson) - Monitor;
• SB 862 (Lowenthal) - Monitor;
• SB 867 (Padilla) - Monitor;
3) Adopt the following federal bill positions:
• S. 826 (Feinstein) - Support;
4► Authorize the Executive Director to modify or communicate
changes, as necessary, to a bill position on pending legislation
consistent with the Commission's approved legislative platform;
and
5) Forward to the Commission for final action.
13. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA
There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar.
14. COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS/STAFF
There were no comments by Commissioners or staff.
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
May 23, 2011
Page 7
15. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Budget and
Implementation Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 a.m.
The next meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee is scheduled
for June 27, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
u~ .
Jennifer Harmon
Clerk of the Board
•
•
"
"
"
R I V E R S I D E
C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
J u n e 2 7 , 2 0 1 1
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
T h e r e s i a T r e v i n o , C h i e f F i n a n c i a l O f f i c e r
T H R O U G H :
J o h n S t a n d i f o r d , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
A m e n d m e n t t o S t a n d b y B o n d P u r c h a s e A g r e e m e n t s R e l a t e d t o t h e
2 0 0 9 B o n d s
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
1 ) R e c e i v e a n d f i l e a r e p o r t o n t h e p r o p o s e d a m e n d m e n t s , i n c l u d i n g t h e F e e
L e t t e r , t o e a c h o f t h e t h r e e S t a n d b y B o n d P u r c h a s e A g r e e m e n t s ( S B P A s )
b e t w e e n t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n a n d J P M o r g a n
C h a s e B a n k , N a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n ( J P M o r g a n ) , a s l i q u i d i t y f a c i l i t y p r o v i d e r ;
2 ) A d o p t R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 1 - 0 1 0 , R e s o l u t i o n A u t h o r i z i n g t h e R e l e a s e o f A l l o r a
P o r t i o n o f t h e D e b t S e r v i c e R e s e r v e F u n d R e l a t e d t o t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n S a l e s T a x R e v e n u e B o n d s ( L i m i t e d T a x B o n d s )
2 0 0 9 S e r i e s A , B , a n d C , t h e E x e c u t i o n a n d D e l i v e r y o f a F o u r t h
S u p p l e m e n t a l I n d e n t u r e , a n O f f e r i n g M e m o r a n d u m , a n d t h e T a k i n g o f A l l
O t h e r A c t i o n s N e c e s s a r y i n C o n n e c t i o n T h e r e w i t h " ;
3 ) A p p r o v e t h e e s t i m a t e d c o s t s t o b e i n c u r r e d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e
a m e n d m e n t s t o b e p a i d f r o m 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A B o n d F i n a n c i n g P r o g r a m
f u n d s a n d t h e e x e c u t i o n o f r e l a t e d a g r e e m e n t s , a s r e q u i r e d ; a n d
4 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
A t i t s A u g u s t 2 0 0 9 m e e t i n g , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a u t h o r i z e d t h e i s s u a n c e o f
$ 1 8 5 m i l l i o n i n s a l e s t a x r e v e n u e b o n d s . T h e b o n d s w e r e i s s u e d i n O c t o b e r 2 0 0 9
a s v a r i a b l e r a t e b o n d s i n t h r e e s e r i e s - A , B , a n d C - w h i c h r e q u i r e l i q u i d i t y
s u p p o r t , w i t h a f i n a l m a t u r i t y i n J u n e 2 0 2 9 . A s a v a r i a b l e r a t e d e b t i s s u e , t h e
2 0 0 9 B o n d s w e r e i n t e g r a t e d w i t h t h e i n t e r e s t r a t e s w a p s e x e c u t e d i n 2 0 0 6 a n d
2 0 0 8 t h a t b e c a m e e f f e c t i v e i n O c t o b e r 2 0 0 9 . I n t e r e s t r a t e s o n t h e b o n d s a r e r e s e t
w e e k l y b y t h e r e m a r k e t i n g a g e n t s - B a r c l a y s C a p i t a l I n c . ; D e L a R o s a & C o . I n c . ;
a n d B a c k s t r o m M c C a r l e y B e r r y & C o . L L C . - w i t h s u c h r a t e s d e t e r m i n e d , i n p a r t ,
b a s e d o n t h e m a r k e t p e r f o r m a n c e o f s i m i l a r , t a x - e x e m p t b o n d s w i t h s i m i l a r l i q u i d i t y
A g e n d a I t e m 7
1
support. To support each series of the 2009 Bonds, the Commission executed
three SBPAs with JPMorgan for a two-year liquidity facility, which expires on
September 29, 2011, at 125 basis points.
At staff's request, the Commission's financial advisor, Fieldman, Rolapp &
Associates (Fieldman) contacted JPMorgan regarding its interest in an extension of
the liquidity facility and changes in certain terms. JPMorgan and Fieldman have
substantially completed negotiations related to an extension for an additional three
year period and acceptable changes in certain terms, including a reduction in the
cost of the liquidity facility and the possible release of all or a portion of the
approximately $14.4 million debt service reserve. Fieldman contacted each of the
rating agencies to identify and resolve any concerns regarding the partial release of
the debt service reserve, and these discussions are still in process.
The release of all or part of the reserve fund allows the Commission to fund the
same amount of additional project costs without a separate financing. The
effective cost of capital for obtaining the additional reserve amount, considering
liquidity fees, reduced investment earnings and estimated costs of the
amendments, is approximately 4% per year. This compares favorablywiththe
Commission's overall cost of capital.
Should the potential release of all or a portion of the debt service reserve result in a
potential downgrade of the Commission's underlying long-term debt ratings by any
of the rating agencies, the Commission will not include this change in the
amendments and will not develop an offering memorandum.
As a result of the proposed extension, the transaction costs for the amendments
are likely to be considerably less than the costs to enter into a liquidity facility with
a new bank under possibly different terms. The estimated costs for this
transaction are estimated to not exceed $200,000 and may consist of fees to be
paid to the following:
• Financial Advisor - Fieldman;
• Bond Counsel - Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP;
• Disclosure Counsel - Fulbright & Jaworski LLP;
• General Counsel - Best, Best & Krieger LLP;
• Liquidity Provider Counsel - Nixon Peabody; and
• Rating Agencies - Moody's, S&P, and Fitch.
The extension of the JPMorgan liquidity facility does not increase the amount of
debt issued and outstanding and' therefore does not affect the Measure A debt
limit. In fact, the cost for liquidity under the amended terms is significantly lower
than the original cost.
Agenda Item 7
•
•
"
"
"
I n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e i s s u a n c e o f t h e 2 0 0 9 B o n d s b y R e s o l u t i o n N o . 0 9 - 0 1 7
a d o p t e d i n A u g u s t 2 0 0 9 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a u t h o r i z e d t h e e x e c u t i o n a n d d e l i v e r y b y
t h e C o m m i s s i o n o f a n y a g r e e m e n t t h a t a m e n d e d a n d / o r e x t e n d e d t h e t e r m s o f a n y
o f t h e f i n a n c i n g a g r e e m e n t s r e l a t i n g t o t h e 2 0 0 9 B o n d s . S t a f f , F i e l d m a n , a n d l e g a l
c o u n s e l h a v e r e v i e w e d t h e a m e n d m e n t s t o t h e S B P A s , i n c l u d i n g t h e a c c o m p a n y i n g
F e e L e t t e r , a n d b e l i e v e i t t o b e a d v a n t a g e o u s t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o e n t e r i n t o t h e
a m e n d m e n t s t o t h e S B P A s . I n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e a u t h o r i t y t o e n t e r i n t o t h e
e x t e n s i o n s p r o v i d e d b y S e c t i o n 1 1 o f R e s o l u t i o n N o . 0 9 - 0 1 7 , i t i s p r o p o s e d t h a t
t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r e x e c u t e t h e a t t a c h e d a m e n d m e n t s , i n c l u d i n g t h e F e e L e t t e r ,
t o t h e S B P A s o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n .
S i g n i f i c a n t c h a n g e s t o t h e s e d o c u m e n t s a r e n o t a n t i c i p a t e d a n d w i l l b e e x e c u t e d
p u r s u a n t t o g e n e r a l c o u n s e l a n d b o n d c o u n s e l r e v i e w s .
A s a r e s u l t o f t h e p o t e n t i a l r e l e a s e o f t h e d e b t s e r v i c e r e s e r v e f u n d , i t h a s b e e n
r e c e n t l y d e t e r m i n e d t h a t a f o u r t h s u p p l e m e n t a l i n d e n t u r e a n d a n o f f e r i n g
m e m o r a n d u m a r e r e q u i r e d a n d a r e l a t e d r e s o l u t i o n a p p r o v i n g t h e s e t w o d o c u m e n t s .
D i s c l o s u r e c o u n s e l a n d b o n d c o u n s e l a r e i n t h e p r o c e s s o f p r e p a r i n g t h e s e
d o c u m e n t s t o b e p r e s e n t e d a t t h e J u l y 1 3 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g . A t t h e m e e t i n g ,
t h e C o m m i s s i o n v v i l l b e r e q u e s t e d t o a p p r o v e t h e f o l l o w i n g :
" R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 1 - 0 1 0 a u t h o r i z i n g t h e r e l e a s e o f a l l o r a p o r t i o n o f t h e d e b t
s e r v i c e r e s e r v e f u n d ; t h e e x e c u t i o n a n d d e l i v e r y o f a f o u r t h s u p p l e m e n t a l
i n d e n t u r e a n d o f f e r i n g m e m o r a n d u m ; a n d t h e t a k i n g o f a l l o t h e r a c t i o n s
n e c e s s a r y i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h i s t r a n s a c t i o n ;
" F o u r t h s u p p l e m e n t a l i n d e n t u r e ( d r a f t ) b e t w e e n t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e
t r u s t e e ( d r a f t ) r e g a r d i n g a n a m e n d m e n t t o t h e t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s o f t h e
2 0 0 9 B o n d s ; a n d
" O f f e r i n g m e m o r a n d u m ( d r a f t ) .
A s p a r t o f t h e a c t i o n t o a u t h o r i z e t h e r e l e a s e o f t h e d e b t s e r v i c e r e s e r v e f u n d
r e l a t e d t o t h e 2 0 0 9 B o n d s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l a p p r o v e t h e f o r m o f t h e O f f e r i n g
M e m o r a n d u m a n d a u t h o r i z e i t s d i s t r i b u t i o n i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e a m e n d m e n t t o
t h e t e r m s o f t h e l i q u i d i t y f a c i l i t y f o r t h e 2 0 0 9 B o n d s . T h e O f f e r i n g M e m o r a n d u m i s
r e q u i r e d u n d e r s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l s e c u r i t i e s l a w s p r o h i b i t i n g t h e o f f e r a n d s a l e o f
s e c u r i t i e s s u c h a s t h e 2 0 0 9 B o n d s , u n l e s s a l l m a t t e r s t h a t w o u l d b e m a t e r i a l t o a n
i n v e s t o r i n t h e 2 0 0 9 B o n d s h a v e b e e n a d e q u a t e l y d i s c l o s e d a n d t h a t t h e r e i s n o
o m i s s i o n o f m a t e r i a l f a c t s . F u r t h e r m o r e , u n d e r a p p l i c a b l e s e c u r i t i e s l a w s a n d
r e g u l a t i o n s , i f t h e r e s e r v e f u n d i s r e d u c e d o r e l i m i n a t e d , t h e r e m a r k e t i n g a g e n t s
( u n d e r w r i t i n g f i r m s ) c a n n o t c o n t i n u e t o m a r k e t t h e 2 0 0 9 B o n d s w i t h o u t a r e v i s e d
O f f e r i n g M e m o r a n d u m .
T h e C o m m i s s i o n e r s s e r v i n g o n t h e B o a r d a s t h e g o v e r n i n g b o d y o f t h e i s s u e r o f t h e
2 0 0 9 B o n d s w i l l b e e x p e c t e d t o r e a d a n d b e f a m i l i a r w i t h t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d
A g e n d a I t e m 7
3
in the draft Offering Memorandum included with the staff report to be presented at
the Commission meeting. The Commissioners may employ the services of experts
to take the lead in the drafting and review of the Offering Memorandum; however,
the Commissioners have the duty to review the information and bring to the
attention of those responsible for the preparation of the offering document any
misstatements or omissions in the draft and to ask questions if they are unclear
about the information or their role. The financing team will be available at the
Commission meeting to respond to the identification of any misstatements or
omissions or to such questions.
The current SBPAs expire on October 1, 2011. Due to the timing provisions
relating to mandatory purchase of the 2009 Bonds, it is important for the
Commission to be able to complete the extension of the SBPAs and other related
amendments before September 1, 2011.
Staff recommends approval of the estimated costs of issuance and execution of
related professional services agreement amendments, as required. Additionally, the
FY 2011/12 budget includes amounts for the liquidity facility fees and
approximately $120,000 for professional services costs. Should the professional
services costs related to this transaction exceed this amount and be less than the
$200,000 not to exceed estimate, staff will return to the Commission at mid -year
for a potential budget adjustment.
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget:
Yes
N/A
Year:
FY 201 1 /12
FY 2012/13+
Amount:
$1,120,100
$2,816,500
Source of Funds:
Measure A
Budget Adjustment:
No
GL/Project Accounting No.:
264-19 65XXX
101-19-65XXX
Fiscal Procedures Approved:
\A,L,464,1Lcu ur
Date:
06/15/11
Attachment: Draft First Amendment Including Fee Letter
Agenda Item 7
•
4
NIXON DRAFT DATED 6/20/11
134471474
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
STANDBY BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT
by and between
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
and
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Dated as of September I, 201 I
relating to
$85,000,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission
2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds)
2009 Series A
5
"
"
"
N I X O N D R A F T D A T E D 6 / 2 0 / 1 1
F I R S T A M E N D M E N T T O
S T A N D B Y B O N D P U R C H A S E A G R E E M E N T
T h i s F I R S T A M E N D M E N T T O S T A N D B Y B O N D P U R C H A S E A G R E E M E N T ( t h i s
" F i r s t A m e n d m e n t ' ) , d a t e d a s o f S e p t e m b e r 1 , 2 0 1 1 , i s b y a n d b e t w e e n t h e R I V E R S I D E
C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N ( i n c l u d i n g a n y s u c c e s s o r s a n d a s s i g n s , t h e
" C o m m i s s i o n " ) a n d J P M O R G A N C H A S E B A N K , N A T I O N A L A S S O C I A T I O N ( i n c l u d i n g a n y
s u c c e s s o r s a n d a s s i g n s , t h e " B a n k " ) . C a p i t a l i z e d t e r m s u s e d b u t n o t d e f i n e d i n t h i s F i r s t
A m e n d m e n t s h a l l h a v e t h e r e s p e c t i v e m e a n i n g s a s s i g n e d t h e r e t o i n t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t ( a s
d e f i n e d b e l o w ) .
W I T N E S S E T H :
W H E R E A S , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e B a n k e n t e r e d i n t o t h e S t a n d b y B o n d P u r c h a s e
A g r e e m e n t , d a t e d a s o f O c t o b e r 1 , 2 0 0 9 ( t h e " O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t ' ) , p u r s u a n t t o w h i c h t h e
B a n k a g r e e d t o p r o v i d e l i q u i d i t y i n s u p p o r t o f $ 8 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 a g g r e g a t e p r i n c i p a l a m o u n t o f
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n S a l e s T a x R e v e n u e B o n d s ( L i m i t e d T a x B o n d s ) ,
2 0 0 9 S e r i e s A ( t h e " 2 0 0 9 S e r i e s A B o n d s " ) ; a n d
W H E R E A S , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e B a n k n o w d e s i r e , a m o n g o t h e r t h i n g s , t o : ( i ) e x t e n d
t h e E x p i r a t i o n D a t e ; a n d ( i i ) m a k e c e r t a i n a d d i t i o n a l a m e n d m e n t s t o t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t .
N O W , T H E R E F O R E , i n c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e f o r e g o i n g a n d o t h e r v a l u a b l e c o n s i d e r a t i o n ,
t h e r e c e i p t a n d s u f f i c i e n c y o f w h i c h a r e h e r e b y a c k n o w l e d g e d , t h e p a r t i e s h e r e t o a g r e e a s
f o l l o w s :
A R T I C L E I
I N T E N T I O N O F P A R T I E S , A G R E E M E N T P R O V I S I O N S
T h e B a n k a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n h a v e e n t e r e d i n t o t h i s F i r s t A m e n d m e n t p u r s u a n t t o
S e c t i o n s 1 0 . 7 a n d 1 0 . 1 0 ( b ) o f t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t t o a m e n d t h e i r r i g h t s a n d o b l i g a t i o n s s e t
f o r t h i n t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t . T h e t e r m s o f t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t , a s a m e n d e d b y t h i s F i r s t
A m e n d m e n t a n d t h e F e e L e t t e r ( a s s o a m e n d e d , t h e " A g r e e m e n t ' ) , s h a l l g o v e r n t h e r i g h t s a n d
o b l i g a t i o n s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e B a n k i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e t r a n s a c t i o n s c o n t e m p l a t e d b y
t h e A g r e e m e n t . T h e a m e n d m e n t s h e r e i n a n d i n t h e F e e L e t t e r ( a s d e f i n e d h e r e i n ) s h a l l b e
e f f e c t i v e o n t h e F i r s t A m e n d m e n t E f f e c t i v e D a t e .
A R T I C L E I I
A M E N D M E N T S
S e c t i o n 2 . 0 1 T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s a n d S c h e d u l e s . ( a ) - T h e T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s i s h e r e b y
a m e n d e d b y d e l e t i n g t h e h e a d i n g " S e c t i o n 2 . 7 C o m m i t m e n t F e e s a n d O t h e r F e e s " a n d r e p l a c i n g
i t w i t h " S e c t i o n 2 . 7 F e e s " .
1 3 4 4 7 1 4 7 . 4
6
(b) The Table of Contents is hereby amended by deleting the reference to "Schedule
I" therein.
(c) Schedule 1 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Section 2.02 Amendment to Section 1.1. (a) The definition of "Amendment Fee" in
Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.
(b) The definition of "Bank Bond Amortization Period" in Section 1.1 of the Original
Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
" `Bank Bond Amortization Period" means, subject to satisfaction of the
conditions set forth in Section 6.2 hereof, the period commencing on the Bank
Bond Amortization Start Date and ending on the first to occur of (i) the fifth (5`h)
anniversary of the Bank Bond Amortization Start Date, (ii) the date on which the
related Bank Bond is redeemed, defeased, accelerated or otherwise paid in
accordance with its terms, (iii) the date of the remarketing of such Bank Bond,
(iv) the date on which such Bank Bond matures in accordance with its terms, (v)
the Substitution Date, (vi) the Conversion Date, and (vii) the date on which the
Available Commitment has been reduced to zero or terminated in its entirety
pursuant to Section 8.4 hereof."
(c) The definition of "Base Rate" in Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby
deleted and replaced with the following:
" `Base Rate' means, for any day, the higher of (a) the Bank's U.S. prime
commercial lending rate in effect for such day (as such U.S. prime commercial
lending rate is announced from time to time by the Bank at its principal New
York office) plus 1.50% per annum, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 2.00% per
annum and (c) 7.50% per annum. Each change in the Base Rate shall take effect
at the time of such change in such U.S. prime commercial lending rate or the
Federal Funds Rate, as the case may be. Each determination of the Base Rate by
the Bank will be conclusive and binding on the Commission, absent manifest
error.
(d) The definition of "Commitment Fee" in Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is
hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
" `Commitment Fee' has the meaning assigned to such term in the Fee
Letter."
(e) The definition of "Expiration Date" in Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is
hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
" `Expiration Date' means the later of (a) 5:O0 p.m., New York time, on
September 30, 2014 or, if such day is not a Business Day, the Business Day next
preceding such day and (b) 5:00 p.m., New York time, on the last day of any
13447147.4
- 3 -
•
7
"
"
e x t e n s i o n o f s u c h d a t e p u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 1 0 . 1 0 ( b ) h e r e o f o r , i f s u c h l a s t d a y i s
n o t a B u s i n e s s D a y , t h e B u s i n e s s D a y n e x t p r e c e d i n g s u c h d a y . "
( f ) T h e d e f i n i t i o n o f " R e l a t e d D o c u m e n t s " i n S e c t i o n 1 . 1 o f t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t
i s h e r e b y d e l e t e d i n i t s e n t i r e t y a n d r e p l a c e d w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g :
" ` R e l a t e d D o c u m e n t s ' m e a n s t h i s A g r e e m e n t , t h e F e e L e t t e r , t h e 2 0 0 9
S e r i e s A B o n d s , t h e 2 0 0 9 S e r i e s B B o n d s , t h e 2 0 0 9 S e r i e s C B o n d s , t h e O t h e r
L i q u i d i t y F a c i l i t i e s a n d t h e I n d e n t u r e . "
( g ) T h e d e f i n i t i o n o f " T e r m i n a t i o n F e e " i n S e c t i o n 1 . 1 o f t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t i s
h e r e b y d e l e t e d i n i t s e n t i r e t y .
( h ) T h e r e i s h e r e b y a d d e d t o S e c t i o n 1 . 1 o f t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t e a c h o f t h e
f o l l o w i n g d e f i n i t i o n s , e a c h o f w h i c h i s t o b e s i t u a t e d a l p h a b e t i c a l l y :
" ` C u t - O f f - D a t e ' h a s t h e m e a n i n g a s s i g n e d t o s u c h t e r m i n S e c t i o n 2 . 9 ( g )
h e r e o f . "
" ` D o d d - F r a n k A c t ' m e a n s t h e D o d d - F r a n k W a l l S t r e e t R e f o r m a n d
C o n s u m e r P r o t e c t i o n A c t o f 2 0 1 0 , a s e n a c t e d b y t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s C o n g r e s s , a n d
s i g n e d i n t o l a w o n J u l y 2 1 , 2 0 1 0 , a n d a l l s t a t u t e s , r u l e s , g u i d e l i n e s o r d i r e c t i v e s
p r o m u l g a t e d t h e r e u n d e r . "
" ` F e e L e t t e r ' m e a n s t h e l e t t e r d a t e d t h e F i r s t A m e n d m e n t E f f e c t i v e D a t e
f r o m t h e B a n k t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e g a r d i n g f e e s a n d e x p e n s e s o r a n y a m e n d m e n t
t h e r e t o o r s u b s t i t u t e t h e r e f o r e a g r e e d t o b y t h e B a n k a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n . "
" ` F i r s t A m e n d m e n t ' m e a n s t h a t c e r t a i n a m e n d m e n t t o t h e O r i g i n a l
A g r e e m e n t , d a t e d t h e F i r s t A m e n d m e n t E f f e c t i v e D a t e , b y a n d b e t w e e n t h e
C o m m i s s i o n a n d t h e B a n k . "
" ` F i r s t A m e n d m e n t E f f e c t i v e D a t e ' m e a n s S e p t e m b e r 3 0 , 2 0 1 1 . "
S e c t i o n 2 . 0 3 A m e n d m e n t t o S e c t i o n 2 . 4 ( d ) . S e c t i o n 2 . 4 ( d ) o f t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t
i s h e r e b y d e l e t e d i n i t s e n t i r e t y a n d r e p l a c e d w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g :
" ( d ) S u b j e c t t o s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h e F e e L e t t e r , t h e
C o m m i s s i o n m a y t e r m i n a t e t h i s A g r e e m e n t a t a n y t i m e f o l l o w i n g n o l e s s t h a n
f i v e ( 5 ) B u s i n e s s D a y s ' p r i o r w r i t t e n n o t i c e t o t h e B a n k a n d t h e T r u s t e e . "
S e c t i o n 2 . 0 4 A m e n d m e n t t o S e c t i o n 2 . 7 . S e c t i o n 2 . 7 o f t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t i s
h e r e b y d e l e t e d i n i t s e n t i r e t y a n d r e p l a c e d w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g :
1 3 4 4 7 1 4 7 . 4
" S e c t i o n 2 . 7 . F e e s .
( a ) T h e C o m m i s s i o n s h a l l p a y t o t h e B a n k t h e f e e s , e x p e n s e s a n d
o t h e r a m o u n t s d e s c r i b e d i n t h e F e e L e t t e r a t t h e t i m e s s p e c i f i e d i n t h e F e e L e t t e r .
- 4 -
(b) Any references to the Commitment Fee, other fees or payments
owed to the Bank hereunder without specific reference to the Fee Letter shall be
read so as to include the Fee Letter, which is hereby incorporated by reference."
Section 2.05 Amendment to Section 2.9. Section 2.9 of the Original Agreement is
hereby amended by adding the following subparagraphs (f) and (g):
"(f) Dodd Frank Act; Basel Committee. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, for purposes of this Agreement (i) all requests, rules, guidelines or
directives in connection with the Dodd -Frank Act shall be deemed to be a
Change of Law under this Section 2.9, regardless of the date enacted, adopted
or issued, and (ii) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated by
the Bank for international Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking
Regulations and Supervisory Practices (or any successor or similar authority)
or any Governmental Authority with proper jurisdiction over the Bank shall be
deemed to be a Change of Law under this Section 2.9 regardless of the date
enacted, adopted or issued.
(g) Increased Costs Cut-off Date. Notwithstanding anything
contained in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) of this Section 2.9, the Commission
shall have no liability to the Bank for any increased costs to the extent incurred
by or imposed on the Bank more than nine months prior to the date the
certificate is given to the Commission with respect thereto (the "Cut -Off -
Date"),
except where (A) the Bank had no actual knowledge of the action
resulting in such increased costs as of the Cut -Off -Date or (B) such increased
costs apply to the Bank retroactively to a date prior to the Cut -Off -Date."
********************************************
Unless otherwise specifically set forth herein, references hereinafter to the Original
Agreement shall be deemed to be references to the Original Agreement as amended hereby and
by the Fee Letter, and terms defined in the Original Agreement shall, unless otherwise modified
in this First Amendment or the Fee Letter, be used herein as defined therein.
ARTICLE III
CONDITIONS TO EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS FIRST AMENDMENT
This First Amendment shall become effective as of the First Amendment Effective Date;
provided that the Bank shall have first received, on or prior to the date hereof, all of the
following (which shall be conclusively evidenced by the Bank's execution and delivery of this
First Amendment):
(a) (i) executed counterparts of this First Amendment and the Fee Letter from the
Commission; and (ii) all other legal- matters . pertaining to the execution and
delivery of this First Amendment and the Fee Letter shall be satisfactory to the
Bank and the execution and delivery hereof and thereof by the Bank shall
constitute conclusive evidence that all such legal matters have been completed to
the satisfaction of the Bank;
13447147.4
- 5 -
•
9
"
"
"
( b ) A c e r t i f i c a t e , d a t e d t h e F i r s t A m e n d m e n t E f f e c t i v e D a t e , t o t h e e f f e c t t h a t ( i ) e a c h
o f t h e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s a n d w a r r a n t i e s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n c o n t a i n e d i n A r t i c l e V o f
t h e O r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t a n d h e r e i n , i s t r u e a n d c o r r e c t i n a l l m a t e r i a l r e s p e c t s o n
a n d a s o f t h e d a t e o f s u c h c e r t i f i c a t e a s t h o u g h m a d e o n a n d a s o f s u c h d a t e
( e x c l u d i n g s u c h r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s o r w a r r a n t i e s t h a t , b y v i r t u e o f t h e p a s s a g e o f
t i m e o n l y , a r e n o l o n g e r t r u e a n d / o r a c c u r a t e ) ; a n d ( i i ) o n s u c h d a t e , n o D e f a u l t o r
E v e n t o f D e f a u l t h a s o c c u r r e d a n d i s c o n t i n u i n g ;
( c ) A l l f e e s s e t f o r t h i n t h e F e e L e t t e r s h a l l b e p a i d i n f u l l i n t h e a m o u n t s a n d t o t h e
e n t i t i e s r e q u i r e d t h e r e b y ;
( d ) E x e c u t e d a m e n d m e n t s t o t h e O t h e r L i q u i d i t y F a c i l i t i e s ; a n d
( e ) S u c h o t h e r d o c u m e n t s , i n s t r u m e n t s , a p p r o v a l s ( a n d , i f r e q u e s t e d b y t h e B a n k ,
c e r t i f i e d d u p l i c a t e s o f e x e c u t e d c o p i e s t h e r e o f ) o r o p i n i o n s a s t h e B a n k m a y
r e a s o n a b l y r e q u e s t o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n .
I n a d d i t i o n , t h e C o m m i s s i o n s h a l l h a v e r e c e i v e d a l l o f t h e f o l l o w i n g :
( i ) C o u n t e r p a r t s o f t h i s F i r s t A m e n d m e n t a n d t h e F e e L e t t e r , d u l y e x e c u t e d
b y t h e B a n k ; a n d
( i i ) S u c h o t h e r d o c u m e n t s , i n s t r u m e n t s , a p p r o v a l s ( a n d , i f r e q u e s t e d b y t h e
C o m m i s s i o n o r t h e T r u s t e e , c e r t i f i e d d u p l i c a t e s o f e x e c u t e d c o p i e s
t h e r e o f ) o r o p i n i o n s a s t h e C o m m i s s i o n o r t h e T r u s t e e m a y r e a s o n a b l y
r e q u e s t o f t h e B a n k .
I n a d d i t i o n , o n o r p r i o r t o t h e d a t e h e r e o f : ( x ) t h e r e s h a l l n o t h a v e o c c u r r e d a n y m a t e r i a l
a d v e r s e c h a n g e i n t h e f i n a n c i a l c o n d i t i o n o r o p e r a t i o n s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n s i n c e t h e d a t e o f t h e
m o s t r e c e n t f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n p r o v i d e d t o t h e B a n k , ( y ) n o c h a n g e s h a l l h a v e o c c u r r e d i n a n y
l a w , r u l e o r r e g u l a t i o n o r i n a n y i n t e r p r e t a t i o n t h e r e o f t h a t , i n t h e o p i n i o n o f c o u n s e l f o r t h e
B a n k , w o u l d m a k e i t i l l e g a l f o r t h e B a n k t o e x e c u t e a n d d e l i v e r t h i s F i r s t A m e n d m e n t a n d t h e
F e e L e t t e r o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o e x e c u t e a n d d e l i v e r t h i s F i r s t A m e n d m e n t a n d t h e F e e L e t t e r ,
a n d ( z ) n o D e f a u l t o r E v e n t o f D e f a u l t h a s o c c u r r e d a n d i s c o n t i n u i n g u n d e r t h e O r i g i n a l
A g r e e m e n t .
A R T I C L E I V
R E P R E S E N T A T I O N S A N D W A R R A N T I E S O F T H E C O M M I S S I O N
T h e C o m m i s s i o n h e r e b y r e p r e s e n t s a n d w a r r a n t s a s f o l l o w s :
( a ) t h e e x e c u t i o n , d e l i v e r y a n d p e r f o r m a n c e b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n o f t h i s F i r s t
A m e n d m e n t a n d t h e F e e L e t t e r a r e w i t h i n i t s p o w e r s , h a v e b e e n d u l y a u t h o r i z e d b y a l l n e c e s s a r y
a c t i o n a n d d o n o t c o n t r a v e n e a n y l a w o r a n y c o n t r a c t u a l r e s t r i c t i o n b i n d i n g o n o r a f f e c t i n g t h e
C o m m i s s i o n ;
1 3 4 4 7 1 4 7 . 4
- 6 -
1 0
(b) the Commission has performed, and is in compliance with, all agreements and
conditions set forth in the Original Agreement and the other Related Documents it is required to
satisfy in connection with the execution, delivery and performance of the First Amendment and
the Fee Letter on and prior to the First Amendment Effective Date and the Original Agreement,
as amended by this First Amendment and the Fee Letter, constitute the legal, valid and binding
obligations of the Commission and are enforceable against the Commission in accordance with
their respective terns except as such enforceability may be limited by applicable reorganization,
insolvency, liquidation, readjustment of debt, moratorium or other similar laws affecting the
enforcement of the rights of creditors generally and by general principles of equity (regardless of
whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law); the exercise of
judicial discretion and the limitations on remedies against transportation commissions in the
State; and
(c) no further authorization, approval or other action by, and no notice to or filing
with, any Governmental Authority with proper jurisdiction over the Commission is required for
the due execution, delivery and performance by the Commission of this First Amendment and
the Fee Letter, and the Commission has provided, or will cause to have provided, written notice
of this First Amendment to the Remarketing Agent, Fitch, Moody's and S&P.
ARTICLE V
FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
The Original Agreement is hereby amended to the extent provided in this First
Amendment and the Fee Letter and, except as specifically provided herein, the Original
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
ARTICLE VI
GOVERNING LAW
THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES UNDER THIS FIRST
AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 10.6 OF THE
ORIGINAL AGREEMENT.
ARTICLE VII
HEADINGS
Section headings in this First Amendment are included herein for convenience of
reference only and shall not have any effect for purposes of interpretation or construction of the
terms of this First Amendment.
ARTICLE VIII
COUNTERPARTS
This First Amendment may be signed in any number of counterpart copies, but all such
copies shall constitute one and the same instrument.
13447147.4
- 7 -
•
•
11
"
A R T I C L E I X
S E V E R A B I L I T Y
I n c a s e a n y o n e o r m o r e o f t h e p r o v i s i o n s c o n t a i n e d h e r e i n s h o u l d b e i n v a l i d , i l l e g a l o r
u n e n f o r c e a b l e i n a n y r e s p e c t , t h e v a l i d i t y , l e g a l i t y a n d e n f o r c e a b i l i t y o f t h e r e m a i n i n g p r o v i s i o n s
c o n t a i n e d h e r e i n s h a l l n o t i n a n y w a y b e a f f e c t e d o r i m p a i r e d h e r e b y .
[ R e m a i n d e r o f p a g e i n t e n t i o n a l l y l e f t b l a n k . ]
1 3 4 4 7 1 4 7 4
- 8 -
1 2
"
"
"
I N W I T N E S S W H E R E O F , t h e p a r t i e s h a v e c a u s e d t h i s F i r s t A m e n d m e n t t o b e d u l y
e x e c u t e d a n d d e l i v e r e d b y t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e o f f i c e r s t h e r e u n t o d u l y a u t h o r i z e d a s o f t h e d a t e f i r s t
a b o v e w r i t t e n .
1 3 4 4 7 1 4 7 . 4
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N
C O M M I S S I O N
B y :
N a m e :
T i t l e :
J P M O R G A N C H A S E B A N K , N A T I O N A L
A S S O C I A T I O N
B y :
S - 1
N a m e :
T i t l e :
1 3
NIXON DRAFT DATED 6/17/11
J P. Morgan
As of September 1, 2011
Riverside County Transportation Commission
P.O. Box 12008
Riverside, CA 92502
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to the Standby Bond Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2009
(the "Original Agreement"), as amended by the First Amendment to the Standby Bond Purchase
Agreement, of even date herewith (the "First Amendment', and, the Original Agreement as
amended by the First Amendment and this Fee Letter, the "Agreement') between the Riverside
County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association (the "Bank"). Any capitalized term below that is defined in the Agreement shall
have the same meaning when used herein. This letter is the Fee Letter described in the
Agreement.
In order to induce the Bank to enter into the First Amendment and to continue to provide
liquidity support for the 2009 Series A Bonds pursuant to the Agreement, the Commission agrees
to make the following payments at the following times:
(A) Commitment Fee.
B447162.4
(1) The Commission hereby agrees to pay to the Bank a commitment fee (the
"Commitment Fee") with respect to the commitment of the Bank at a per annum
rate (the "Commitment Fee Rate") multiplied by the Available Commitment.
The Commission and the Bank agree that as of First Amendment Effective Date
the Commitment Fee Rate will be [0.7651%. The Commitment Fee Rate may be
adjusted from time to time pursuant to the table below:
14
13447162.4
Level
Commission Bond Rating}
Commitment Fee
Rate
Moody's
Fitch/S&P
I
Aal or
better
AA+or
better
[76.5] bppa
II
Aa2
AA
[76.5] bppa
III
Aa3
AA-
[96.5] bppa
IV
Al
A+
[116.5] bppa
V
A2
A
[136.5] bppa
VI
A3
A-
[156.5] bppa
VII
Baal
BBB+
[176.5] bppa
VIII
Baa2
BBB
[196.5] bppa
IX
Baa3
BBB-
[216.5] bppa
X
Below Baa3
Below BBB-
[236.5] bppa
(2) Improvements/Downgrades of Commission Bond Rating.
If the Commission Bond Ratings assigned by all of the Rating Agencies, or by
two of the three Rating Agencies, are at the same level, the Commitment Fee Rate
will be based on the level at which all of the Rating Agencies, or two of the three
Rating Agencies, if applicable, have assigned their respective Commission Bond
Rating(s). For example, if Fitch assigns an "AA" rating, Moody's assigns an
"Aa2" rating and S&P assigns an "AA+" rating, the Commitment Fee Rate will
be determined in accordance with level II.
If the Commission Bond Ratings assigned by each of the Rating Agencies is at a
different level, the Commitment Fee Rate will be based on the rating assigned to
the level in the middle of the three rating levels. For example, if Fitch assigns an
"AA" rating, Moody's assigns an "Aa3" rating and S&P assigns an "AA+" rating,
the Commitment Fee Rate will be determined in accordance with level II.
However, if Fitch assigns an "AA-" rating, Moody's assigns an "A2" rating and
S&P assigns an "AA" rating, the Commitment Fee Rate will be determined in
accordance with level III.
The change in the Commitment Fee Rate will be increased or reduced, as
applicable, on such date that the Rating Agency or Rating Agencies in question
shall have publicly announced its/their improvement/downgrade of its/their
Commission Bond Rating(s) which improvement/downgrade affects the level or
levels described above.
(3) The Commitment Fee shall be payable in immediately available funds quarterly
in arrears commencing on the first Business Day of December, 2011; provided,
however, that in connection with the payment due on the first Business Day of
2
•
15
(1) On or before the First Amendment Effective Date, the Commission shall pay the
fees and expenses of Nixon Peabody LLP, counsel to the Bank, in an amount not
to exceed $ ; and
(2) In connection with the written request by the Commission or the Trustee for (i)
any amendment, supplement, waiver, consent or other modification of the
Agreement, the Indenture or any other Related Document requiring any action on
the part of the Bank, or (ii) any transfer of the rights and obligations under the
Agreement by the Commission or the Trustee, the Commission shall pay or cause
to be paid to the Bank a fee of $5,000 (the "Amendment Fee"), plus reasonable
fees and expenses of counsel to the Bank, for each amendment, supplement,
waiver, consent or other modification hereof; provided however, an amendment of
the Agreement at the request of the Bank or that entails nothing more than an
extension of the term or adjustment to the Commitment Fee shall not require the
payment of the Amendment Fee. Said Amendment Fees will be payable as set
forth in paragraph (E) hereof.
(C) Purchase Fee. The Commission shall pay to the Bank a purchase fee (the
"Purchase Fee") in an amount equal to $500 for each purchase of 2009 Series A Bonds by the
Bank, which amount shall be payable as set forth in paragraph (E) hereof.
(D) Termination Fee. In the event the Commission replaces ,or terminates the
Agreement prior to the Expiration Date, then the Commission shall pay to the Bank, in addition
to all other Obligations that may be due and payable at such time, a termination fee equal to the
Commitment Fee for the Commitment Period, less any Commitment Fees paid during such
period pursuant to paragraph (A) hereof (the "Termination Fee"). Notwithstanding the
foregoing provisions of this paragraph (D), no Termination Fee will be required to be paid by the
Commission if (i) the 2009 Series A Bonds are then rated by Moody's, Moody's shall have
lowered or withdrawn the short-term rating on the 2009 Series A Bonds below "P-1," as a result
of the reduction by Moody's of the senior, unsecured short-term rating of the Bank; or (ii) the
2009 Series A Bonds are then rated by Standard & Poor's, Standard & Poor's shall have lowered
or withdrawn the short-term rating on the 2009 Series A Bonds below "A-1," as a result of the
reduction by Standard Poor's of the senior, unsecured short-term rating of the Bank; or (iii) the
2009 Series A Bonds are then rated by Fitch, Fitch shall have lowered or withdrawn the short-
term rating on the 2009 Series A Bonds below "F-1," as a result of the reduction by Fitch of the
senior, unsecured short-term rating of the Bank; or (iv) the Bank seeks to impose a fee increase
pursuant to Section 2.9 of the Agreement; or (v) the Commission elects to prepay, defease,
refinance or refund the 2009 Series A Bonds in full from a source of funds which does not
involve the issuance by a bank or other financial institution of a letter of credit, liquidity facility,
or credit facility or does not involve a bank direct purchase; provided, however, all Obligations
including, without limitation, all principal and interest evidenced by Bank Bonds and all amounts
payable under the Agreement and hereunder, shall be paid to the Bank at or prior to the time of
termination. Payment of the Termination Fee will be subject to compliance with the provisions
of paragraph (E) hereof. In addition, the Commission shall comply with the requirements of the
Indenture with respect to terminating the Agreement.
13447162 4
4
•
•
•
17
(E) Fees and Payments. The Commission hereby agrees to pay (i) Commitment Fees
and Amendments Fees to the Bank on or before thirty (30) days following the delivery by the
Bank to the Commission and the Trustee of an invoice for such amount, and (ii) the Purchase
Fees within five (5) Business Days upon delivery by the Bank to the Commission and the
Trustee of an invoice for such amount (collectively, the "Fee Payment Due Date"); provided
that any Termination Fee payable by the Commission to the Bank shall be payable on or prior to
the date of termination regardless of the date of delivery of the invoice therefor. Any fee not
paid by the Commission by the third (3rd) Business Days next following the Fee Payment Due
Date shall bear interest at the Default Rate from such third (3rd) Business Day until the day such
fee is received by the Bank. Failure by the Bank to deliver any such invoice shall not modify the
liability of the Commission for any such fees; provided that such fees shall not become due and
payable and interest shall not accrue thereon except as set forth in the preceding sentence.
All amounts paid pursuant to this Fee Letter shall be non-refundable.
The obligation of the Commission to pay the Commitment Fee and all other amounts set
forth herein and in the Agreement as fees (including, but not limited to, the fees herein and the
fees described in Sections 2.9 and 10.3 of the Agreement) shall be payable from the Fee and
Expense Fund of the Revenue Fund, pursuant to Section 5.02(A)(5) of the Indenture, if and to
the extent that such amounts are not paid by the Commission from other moneys. Interest, fees
and other amounts payable to the Bank under the Agreement and this Fee Letter shall be
computed on the basis of a 365-day year and actual days elapsed; provided, however,
computations of the Commitment Fee and the Termination Fee shall be made on the basis of a
360-day year and actual days elapsed. All amounts paid pursuant to this Fee Letter shall be paid
in the manner set forth in the Agreement.
This Fee Letter may not be amended or waived except by an instrument in writing signed
by the Bank and the Commission.
This Fee Letter may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one agreement. Delivery of
an executed signature page of this Fee Letter by electronic transmission shall be effective as
delivery of a manually executed counterpart hereof.
This Fee Letter is delivered to the Commission on the understanding that, except as
customarily submitted to Commission members or as required by law, regulation or a court of
competent jurisdiction or in connection with a dispute, including but not limited to legal
proceedings, between the Commission and the Bank, the Commission will use its best efforts,
without liability, to ensure that neither this Fee Letter nor any of its terms shall be disclosed
directly by the Commission to any other financial institution nor posted to the Municipal
Securities Rulemaking Board's Electronic Municipal Market Access system. The Bank
acknowledges that this Fee Letter is subject to open records requests received by the
Commission and will be submitted to Commission members and discussed in open meetings as
is customary practice and procedure for the Commission. Should this Fee Letter be disclosed
pursuant to such a request or procedures, the Commission shall have no responsibility or liability
for the further dissemination of this Fee Letter or any of the information contained therein to
other persons.
13447162.4
5
18
13447162.4
[Remainder ofpage intentionally left blank.]
6
19
"
P l e a s e c o n f i r m t h a t t h e f o r e g o i n g i s o u r m u t u a l u n d e r s t a n d i n g b y s i g n i n g a n d r e t u r n i n g t o
t h e B a n k a n e x e c u t e d c o u n t e r p a r t o f t h i s F e e L e t t e r . T h i s F e e L e t t e r s h a l l b e c o m e e f f e c t i v e a s o f
t h e d a t e f i r s t a b o v e r e f e r e n c e d u p o n o u r r e c e i p t o f a n e x e c u t e d c o u n t e r p a r t o f t h i s F e e L e t t e r
f r o m t h e C o m m i s s i o n .
V e r y t r u l y y o u r s ,
J P M O R G A N C H A S E B A N K , N A T I O N A L
A S S O C I A T I O N
B y :
A c c e p t e d a n d a g r e e d t o
a s o f t h e d a t e f i r s t
w r i t t e n a b o v e b y :
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N
C O M M I S S I O N
B y :
N a m e :
T i t l e :
1 3 4 4 7 1 6 2 . 4
7
N a m e :
T i t l e :
2 0
IRIVERSIDE
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
June 27, 2011
TO:
Budget and Implementation Committee
FROM:
Andrea Zureick, Senior Staff Analyst
Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager
THROUGH:
Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director
SUBJECT:
Fiscal Years 2012-16 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement
Plans for Local Streets and Roads
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Approve the FYs 2012-16 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans
(CIP) for Local Streets and Roads as submitted; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Measure A imposes several requirements on local agencies in order to receive local
streets and roads funds. First, the Coachella Valley and Western County cities and
the county must be participating in either the Coachella Valley Association of
Governments (CVAG) or Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. Western County agencies
must also participate in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan managed by the Western Riverside County Regional
Conservation Authority (RCA). The cities of Beaumont and La Quinta are not
TUMF participants, and Commission staff is in the process of obtaining
confirmation from CVAG, WRCOG, and RCA regarding the current participation in
their programs. Additionally, agencies are required to annually provide to the
Commission a CIP detailing how those funds are to be expended and an annual
certification of maintenance of effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting
the calculation.
On February 28, 2011, Commission staff provided the local agencies with
Measure A revenue projections for local streets and roads to assist in preparation of
the required CIP. The required CIP and supporting documentation have been
received from all of the local agencies except the county of Riverside and the city
of Cathedral City, which have informed Commission staff that they will submit the
respective CIPs within a few weeks. Late submittals will be presented to the
Agenda Item 8
21
Commission for approval at subsequent meetings. The FY 2011 /12 Measure A
Local Streets and Roads disbursements to local agencies with Commission
approved CIPs are expected to begin in September 2011.
The CIPs received are posted on the Commission's website and are on file at the
Commission.
Attachment: FYs 2012-16 Measure A Five -Year CIPs — Posted on Commission
Website
22
•
Agenda Item 8
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Measure A Local Funds Program
FY 2011 to 2012
Agency: City of Calimesa
Page __1__of __1__:
Prepared by: Carlos Zamano
Phone Number: (909) 795-9804
Date: June 13, 2011
Item
No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs
Measure A
Funds
1
Various streets city wide Street overlay & slurry seal
projects on an annual
basis—Prop 1B Funding $43,000 $30,000
2
Pavement reconstruction on
Avenue “L” between Fourth
Street and Douglas Street
Rehabilitate Pavement on
Avenue “L” after the
completion of the storm
drainage project Phase II—
STP local monies
$100,000 $10,000
3
Calimesa Boulevard Landscape
Project from Avenue “L” to
Sandalwood Avenue
Landscape Calimesa
Boulevard with additional
planters, trees, decorative
lighting, and gazebo shades
as required---Seek
Transportation
Enhancement Grant monies
$385,000 $33,000
4
Calimesa Boulevard and
County Line Road Intersection
improvements, west to the
Interstate 10 Freeway
Work with pre-planning
conceptual design, water
agency legal requirements,
etc. prior to widening
intersection of County Line
Road and Calimesa
Boulevard, re-establish
potable water well—
DEMOSTL grant monies
$180,000 $160,000
5
Third Street Pedestrian
Enhancement Project from
County Line Road to Avenue
“L”
Construct sidewalk and
related incidental storm
drainage facilities to
facilitate to-and-from school
pedestrian safety---TCSP-
CALTRANS grant
$200,000 $40,000
6
2nd Street (Avenue L to Avenue
H) and Avenue L (2nd Street to
3rd Street) Street and Sidewalk
Improvements
Construct infill paving,
curbs, gutters and sidewalk
on both sides of Second
Street. Construct missing
sidewalk on Avenue L ---
SR2S grant.
$994,000 $99,000
7
Singleton Road/Bryant Street
Gap Closure (Lariat Road to
640’ s/o Avenue L)
Complete PS&E to
construct two-lane road to
connect Singleton Road
and Bryant Street. City will
seek grant funding to
construct improvements.
$40,000 $40,000
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Measure A Local Funds Program
FY 2012 to 2013
Agency: City of Calimesa
Page __1__of __1__:
Prepared by: Carlos Zamano
Phone Number: (909) 795-9804
Date: June 13, 2011
Item
No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs
Measure A
Funds
1
Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, &
reconstruction projects on
an annual basis— $65,000 $40,000
2
Pavement reconstruction on
Avenue “L” between Fourth
Street and Douglas Street
Observe rehabilitated
pavement on Avenue “L”
after the completion of the
storm drainage project—
STP local monies
$65,000 $15,000
3
Calimesa Boulevard Landscape
Project from Avenue “L” to
Sandalwood Avenue
Re-slurry or fog-seal street,
maintain all electrically
decorated trees and gazebo
shades as required
$65,000 $31,000
4
Calimesa Boulevard and
County Line Road Intersection
improvements, west to the
Interstate 10 Freeway
Complete PA&ED and
PS&E—DEMOSTL grant
monies $100,000 $100,000
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Measure A Local Funds Program
FY 2013 to 2014
Agency: City of Calimesa
Page __1__of __1__:
Prepared by: Carlos Zamano
Phone Number: (909) 795-9804
Date: June 13, 2011
Item
No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs
Measure A
Funds
1
Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, &
reconstruction projects on
an annual basis. Study
construction needed to
improve traffic flows.
$152,000 $112,000
2
Pavement reconstruction on
Avenue “L” between Fourth
Street and Douglas Street
Fog seal rehabilitated
pavement on Avenue “L”
after the completion of the
storm drainage project
$42,000 $20,000
3
Calimesa Boulevard Landscape
Project from Avenue “L” to
Sandalwood Avenue
Observe and note
deficiencies in the
landscaping and lighting on
Calimesa Boulevard.
Remove graffiti as req’d.
$13,000 $8,000
4
Calimesa Boulevard and
County Line Road Intersection
improvements, west to the
Interstate 10 Freeway
Work with South Mesa
Water Company to relocate
an existing well in conflict
with proposed
improvements —DEMOSTL
grant monies
$765,000 $153,000
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Measure A Local Funds Program
FY 2014 to 2015
Agency: City of Calimesa
Page __1__of __1__:
Prepared by: Carlos Zamano
Phone Number: (909) 795-9804
Date: May 28, 2010
Item
No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs
Measure A
Funds
1
Various streets city wide Street overlay, slurry seal, &
reconstruction projects on
an annual basis—Prop 1B
Funding
$100,000 $44,000
2
Pavement reconstruction on
Avenue “L” between Fourth
Street and Douglas Street
Observe previous pavement
protection measures on
Avenue “L” after the
completion of the storm
drainage project.
$10,000 $5,000
3
Calimesa Boulevard Landscape
Project from Avenue “L” to
Sandalwood Avenue
Observation and graffiti
removal on landscaping,
lighting, and gazebos on
Calimesa Boulevard
$15,000 $15,000
4
Calimesa Boulevard and
County Line Road Intersection
improvements, west to the
Interstate 10 Freeway
Continue work with South
Mesa Water Company to
relocate an existing well in
conflict with proposed
improvements- DEMOSTL
grant monies
$720,000 $144,000
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Measure A Local Funds Program
FY 2015 to 2016
Agency: City of Calimesa
Page __1__of __1__:
Prepared by: Carlos Zamano
Phone Number: (909) 795-9804
Date: June 13, 2011
Item
No. Project Names/ Limits Project Type Total Costs
Measure A
Funds
1
Various streets city wide Street overlay & slurry seal
projects on an annual
basis—Prop 1B Funding $45,000 $36,000
2
Calimesa Boulevard Landscape
Project from Avenue “L” to
Sandalwood Avenue
Re-slurry seal and re-stripe
Calimesa Boulevard. Repair
planter irrigation and
lighting systems as
required.
$75,000 $50,000
3
Calimesa Boulevard and
County Line Road Intersection
improvements, west to the
Interstate 10 Freeway
Acquire right-of-way to
widen intersection of
County Line Road and
Calimesa Boulevard.
$100,000 $45,000
4
Reconstruct and Widen
Singleton Road Interchange
Complete PSR for
interchange – Developer
Funded project $200,000 $10,000
Agency: City of Canyon LakePage 1 of 1Prepared by: Habib MotlaghPhone #:(951) 943-6504Date: 4/18/2011Item Total Cost Measure A EstimatedNo.Project Name / Limits Project Type($000's)Funds ($000's)Completion Status1 Widening 9,000 1,200 2011Final Design 90%, Advertisement for June 2011Total 9,000 1,200 Railroad Canyon RoadRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAMPROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2010 - 2011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAMFY 2011 - 2016Agency: City of Canyon LakePage 1 of 1Prepared by: Habib MotlaghPhone #:(951) 943-6504Date: 4/18/2011ItemTotal Cost Measure ANo.Project Name / Limits Project Type($000's)Funds ($000's)19,000 600 * RCTC will advance $600,000 to complete the project.Total 9,000 600 Rehabilitation and Widening of Railroad Canyon RoadPavement Replacement, Widening, Signal Modification, Striping, Utility Relocation, Median Improvements
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
COMPLETED PROJECTS
FY 2010 - 2011
Agency: City of Coachella
Page 1 of 3
Prepared by: Hoy
Phone #: 760.398.3502
Date: 5/24/11
Item
No.
Project Name / Limits
Project Type
Total Cost
($000’s)
Measure A
Funds
($000’s)
1
2
3
4
Van Buren Street
South of Avenue 48
Frederick Street
South of Avenue 49
Dillon Road
South of Avenue 44
Enterprise Way
South of Avenue 52
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Overlay
Reconstruct
$200
$180
$50
$180
$157
$125
$50
$125
TOTALS $610 $457
\MeasACFP.20010.11
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2012 - 2016
Agency: City of Coachella
Page 2 of 3
Prepared by: Hoy
Phone #: 760.398.3502
Date: 5/24/11
Item
No.
Project Name / Limits
Project Type
Total Cost
($000’s)
Measure A
Funds
($000’s)
FY 2011-12
1
Tyler Street
Avenue 53 South to
Avenue 54
Reconstruct
$430
$430
FY 2012-13
2
3
4
5
Naomi Court
From La Ponderosa to East
End
Perez Street
From Naomi Ct. to La
Hernandez
Romaulda Court
Perez Street to La
Hernandez East End
Ortiz Street
From Perez St. to La
Hernandez
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
$147
$160
$68
$68
$147
$160
$68
$68
FY 2013-14
6
7
8
Via Conchilla
From Avenida De Plata to
Avenida De Platina
Avenida De Oro
From Ave. 50 to Guitron
Street
Avenida Cortez
From Avenue 50 to Calle
Leon
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
$43
$240
$173
$43
$240
$173
FY 20014-15
9
10
11
12
Calle Vega
From Calle Leon to Paseo
Laredo
Paseo De Laredo
From Frederick to Avenida
Cortez
Via Durango
From Avenida Coez to End
Avenue 48
From Van Buren West ¼
mile
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
$59
$88
$59
$264
$59
$88
$59
$264
FY 20015-16
12
14
15
16
Via Hermosa
From Avenida Cortez to
End
Vera Cruz
From Avenida Cortez to
End
Frederick Street
From Avenue 50 to Avenue
49
Avenue 49
From Harrison to Van Buren
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Slurry
$59
$59
$260
$200
$59
$59
$260
$106
ACFP.2010.14
MeasACFP.2007.11
TOTALS $2377 $2283
CITY OF EASTVALE
MEASURE A EXPENDITURE PLAN
Fiscal Year 2011/12 – 2015/16
Submitted May 2011
City of Eastvale
6080 Hamner Ave., Ste 103
Eastvale, CA 91752
City of Eastvale - Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2011/12- FY 15/16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2011 - 2012
Agency: City of Eastvale
Page 1 of 5
Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, City Engineer
Phone #: 951-361-0900
Date: May 15, 2011
Item
No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A
Funds
1 Street Improvements
(various project locations citywide)
Widen, repair or reconstruct
roadways as needed
$390,000 $390,000
2
Roadway Safety and Traffic
Improvements Program
(various project locations citywide)
Remove, replace, install
signs, pavement markings,
related roadway safety
improvements
$150,000 $150,000
3
Citywide Maintenance
Program
Right-of-way maintenance
and repair to include but not
limited to: striping, stenciling;
repairs to streets and
culvert/drainage facilities;
storm damage/flood control
projects; widening streets
$500,000 $300,000
4 Accessibility Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
including sidewalk repairs
and replacements, new
sidewalk construction,
pedestrian/ADA
improvements
$100,000
$100,000
5 8% Overhead / Admin Line-
Item Administration $82,000 $82,000
TOTAL Measure A Funds:
$1,022,000 (see note below)
Please note: City of Eastvale did not expend its FY 10/11 Measure A
allocation of $430,500 (but the City does have an RCTC approved 5-year
Expenditure Plan). The FY 10/11 have been reprogrammed and included
with FY 11/12 allocation of $579,000. With $12,915 in interest earnings,
this makes a total funding of $1,022,000 (rounded) available for
expenditure in FY 11/12 (shown above).
City of Eastvale - Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2011/12- FY 15/16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2012 - 2013
Agency: City of Eastvale
Page 2 of 5
Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, City Engineer
Phone #: 951-361-0900
Date: May 15, 2011
Item
No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A
Funds
1 Street Improvements
(various project locations citywide)
Widen, repair or reconstruct
roadways as needed
$200,000 $200,000
2
Roadway Safety and Traffic
Improvements Program
(various project locations citywide)
Remove, replace, install
signs, pavement markings,
related roadway safety
improvements
$75,000 $75,000
3
Citywide Maintenance
Program
Right-of-way maintenance
and repair to include but not
limited to: striping, stenciling;
repairs to streets and
culvert/drainage facilities;
storm damage/flood control
projects; widening streets
$1,284,000 $223,000
4 Accessibility Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
including sidewalk repairs
and replacements, new
sidewalk construction,
pedestrian/ADA
improvements
$50,000
$50,000
5 8% Overhead / Admin Line-
Item Administration $48,000 $48,000
TOTAL Measure A Funds: $596,000
City of Eastvale - Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2011/12- FY 15/16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2013 - 2014
Agency: City of Eastvale
Page 3 of 5
Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, City Engineer
Phone #: 951-361-0900
Date: May 15, 2011
Item
No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A
Funds
1 Street Improvements
(various project locations citywide)
Widen, repair or reconstruct
roadways as needed
$0 $0
2
Roadway Safety and Traffic
Improvements Program
(various project locations citywide)
Remove, replace, install
signs, pavement markings,
related roadway safety
improvements
$75,000 $75,000
3
Citywide Maintenance
Program
Right-of-way maintenance
and repair to include but not
limited to: striping, stenciling;
repairs to streets and
culvert/drainage facilities;
storm damage/flood control
projects; widening streets
$1,366,000 $440,000
4 Accessibility Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
including sidewalk repairs
and replacements, new
sidewalk construction,
pedestrian/ADA
improvements
$50,000
$50,000
5 8% Overhead / Admin Line-
Item Inter-fund Transfer $49,000 $49,000
TOTAL Measure A Funds: $614,000
City of Eastvale - Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2011/12- FY 15/16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2014 - 2015
Agency: City of Eastvale
Page 4 of 5
Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, City Engineer
Phone #: 951-361-0900
Date: May 15, 2011
Item
No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A
Funds
1 Street Improvements
(various project locations citywide)
Widen, repair or reconstruct
roadways as needed
$0 $0
2
Roadway Safety and Traffic
Improvements Program
(various project locations citywide)
Remove, replace, install
signs, pavement markings,
related roadway safety
improvements
$75,000 $75,000
3
Citywide Maintenance
Program
Right-of-way maintenance
and repair to include but not
limited to: striping, stenciling;
repairs to streets and
culvert/drainage facilities;
storm damage/flood control
projects; widening streets
$1,248,000 $456,000
4 Accessibility Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
including sidewalk repairs
and replacements, new
sidewalk construction,
pedestrian/ADA
improvements
$50,000
$50,000
5 8% Overhead / Admin Line-
Item Administration $51,000 $51,000
TOTAL Measure A Funds: $632,000
City of Eastvale - Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2011/12- FY 15/16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2015 - 2016
Agency: City of Eastvale
Page 5 of 5
Prepared by: Michael Kashiwagi, City Engineer
Phone #: 951-361-0900
Date: May 15, 2011
Item
No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A
Funds
1 Street Improvements
(various project locations citywide)
Widen, repair or reconstruct
roadways as needed
$0 $0
2
Roadway Safety and Traffic
Improvements Program
(various project locations citywide)
Remove, replace, install
signs, pavement markings,
related roadway safety
improvements
$75,000 $75,000
3
Citywide Maintenance
Program
Right-of-way maintenance
and repair to include but not
limited to: striping, stenciling;
repairs to streets and
culvert/drainage facilities;
storm damage/flood control
projects; widening streets
$1,131,000 $474,000
4 Accessibility Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
including sidewalk repairs
and replacements, new
sidewalk construction,
pedestrian/ADA
improvements
$50,000
$50,000
5 8% Overhead / Admin Line-
Item Administration $52,000 $52,000
TOTAL Measure A Funds: $651,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAMFY 2012-2016Agency: City of HemetPage 1 of 1Prepared by: Victor Monz, Principal EngineerPhone #: (951) 765-3847Date: May 13, 2011Item No.Project Name/LimitsProject TypeTotal CostMeasure A Funds($000's) ($000's)2011-2012 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Grind/Overlay 4,596 2,229Curb/gutterAccess Ramps2013-2014 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Grind/Overlay 4,710 2,343Curb/gutterAccess Ramps2015-2016 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Grind/Overlay 4,854 2,487Curb/gutterAccess RampsTOTALS 14,160 7,059This scenario would require approximately 1,000,000 SF of Pavement Rehabiliationevery 2 years and is calculated to be performed on an every 2 Fiscal Years schedule
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAMFY 2012-2016Agency: City of HemetPage 1 of 1Prepared by: Victor Monz, Principal EngineerPhone #: (951) 765-3847Date: May 13, 2011Item No.Project Name/LimitsProject TypeTotal CostMeasure A FundsStatus($000's) ($000's)2010-2011 Sewer Replacement/Street Rehabilitation Street Reconstruct 1,114 581 50% compl.Curb/gutterAccess Ramps2011-2012 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Grind/Overlay 4,596 2,229 in designCurb/gutterAccess Ramps2013-2014 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Grind/Overlay 4,710 2,343 conceptualCurb/gutterAccess Ramps2015-2016 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Grind/Overlay 4,854 2,487 conceptualCurb/gutterAccess RampsTOTALS 14,160 7,059This scenaio would require approximately $6,441,000 in MOE ExpendituresCIP plan is based on a 2 year cycleEstimated Completion30-Jun-1230-Jun-1430-Jun-1630-May-11
Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public WorksItemNo.Project Name / LimitsProject TypeTotal Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's)Estimated CompletionStatus$1,4442010-2011$809BALANCE$2,2531Newport Rd - Haun Rd South Median ModificationStreet Improvements $200 $0 n/a Caltrans withheld permit2Bradley Rd - Newport Rd to Potomac Rd AC OverlayStreet Maintenance $300 $2006/30/11Bids due 5/23/113Encanto Rd - Shadel Rd to Ethanac Rd AC OverlayStreet Maintenance $400 $2006/30/11Bids due 5/23/114Bradley/Enconto DesignStreet Maintenance $24 $2402/01/11Plans and Specs5Newport Rd - Antelope Rd North Median ModificationStreet Improvements $120 $0 n/a Caltrans withheld permit6Residential Slurry ProgramStreet Maintenance $500 $0 n/aHeld over7 County of Riverside,Signal Main.Staff Assistance $100 $5106/30/11 Ongoing8 CIP Program AnalysisStaff Assistance $10 $1005/03/119 Consultants Traffic/MS4/etc$200 $10506/30/11 OngoingTOTAL$1,854 $230CARRY OVER$2,023RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISIONMEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAMPROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2010 - 2011Phone #: 951-672-6777Date: May 5, 20112009-2010 CarryoverAgency: City of MenifeePage 1 of 1
Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public WorksItemNo.Project Name / Limits Project TypeTotal Cost Measure A Funds $2,0232011-2012$892BALANCE$2,9151 Newport Road, Haun to Menifee Design$150 $1502 Newport Road, Haun to Menifee Construction$1,000 $1,0003 Slurry Seal Program Preparation Street Maintenance $60 $604Bradley Rd - Newport Rd to Potomac Rd AC OverlayStreet Maintenance $300 $3005Encanto Rd - Shadel Rd to Ethanac Rd AC OverlayStreet Maintenance $400 $4006Newport Signal Connection Street Maintenance$200 $2007 Slurry Seal Street Maintenance$800 $7008Garbani Rd, Bradley Rd at Craig Ave to Kurt StStreet Maintenance $4009 Street Stripping and Pvmt Markers Street Maintenance$100 $100TOTAL$3,410 $2,910CARRY OVER$5RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISIONMEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAMFY 20122010-2011 CarryoverPhone #: 951-672-6777Date: May 5, 2011Agency: City of MenifeePage 1 of 5
Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public WorksItemNo.Project Name / Limits Project TypeTotal Cost($000's)Measure A Funds ($000's)2011-2012 Carryover$5 2012-2013$919BALANCE$9241 Newport Road, Haun to Murietta Street Maintenance $700 $700TOTAL$700 $700CARRY OVER$224RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONPhone #: 951-672-6777Date: May 5, 2011Agency: City of MenifeePage 2 of 5 MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAMFY 2013
Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public WorksItemNo.Project Name / Limits Project TypeTotal Cost($000's)Measure A Funds ($000's)$224$947$1,1711Murietta Road, Newport to McCall Street Maintenance $500 $5002Slurry Seal Program Street Maintenance $500 $500TOTALS$1,000$1,000CARRYOVER$171BALANCEDate: May 5, 2011Page 3 of 5 Phone #: 951-672-6777RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAMAgency: City of MenifeeFY 20142012-2013 Carryover2013-2014
Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public WorksItemNo.Project Name / Limits Project TypeTotal Cost($000's)Measure A Funds ($000's)$1712014-2015$975$1,1461Slurry Seal Program, Homeland/Romoland AreaStreet Maintenance $900 $900TOTALS$900 $900CARRY OVER$2462013-2014 Carry overBALANCEDate: May 5, 2011Page 4 of 5 Phone #: 951-672-6777RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAMAgency: City of MenifeeFY 2015
Prepared by: Don Allison, City Engineer/Director of Public WorksItemNo.Project Name / Limits Project TypeTotal Cost($000's)Measure A Funds ($000's)$2462015-2016$1,004$1,2501Slurry Seal Program, Area South of NewportStreet Maintenance $900 $9002 Briggs Road Paving New Pavement $300 $300TOTALS$1,200 $1,200CARRY OVER$50Date: May 5, 20112014-2015 Carry overBALANCERIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAMFY 2016Agency: City of MenifeePage 5 of 5 Phone #: 951-672-6777
.9
CITY OF PERRIS
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
101 North ‘D’Street,Perris,CA 92570-2200
TEL:951-943-4610 FAX:951-943-5065
May 24,2011.
Theresia Trevino
Chief Financial Officer
Riverside County of Transportation Commission
P.O.Box 12008
Riverside,CA 92502-2208
Attn:Shirley Medina
Re:FY 2011-2016 Measure”A”Improvement Plan
Enclosed,please find City of Penis proposed 5-year capital improvement plan.Also enclosed,
please find an exhibit depicting the status of the currently adopted 5-year plan and the MOE
prepared by the Finance Department and signed by the City Mmager.
Please call if you have any qLlestions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Habib Moag1
City Engineer
Cc:Ron Carr,Assistant City Manager
James Fructuoso,Assistant Finance Director
Agency:CityofPerrisPage1of5Preparedby:HabibMotlaghPhone#:(951)943-6504Date:4/18/2011RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATIONCOMMISSIONMEASURE‘A”LOCALSTREETSANDROADSPROGRAMFY2OJ1-2012ItemTotalCostMeasureANoProjectName/LimitsProjectType($000’s)Funds($000’s)1AnnualSlurrySeal&OverlayPavementRehabilitation1,0005002RamonaExpresswayMedianMedian/Landscaping1,200203PerrisBlvd.@1-215PavementRehabilitation1501504MetzRoadImprovementsNewPavement200150ITotal.2,550820
RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATIONCOMMISSIONMEASUREIA”LOCALSTREETSANDROADSPROGRAMFY2012-2013Agency:CityofPerrisPage2of5Preparedby:HabibMotlaghPhone#:(951)943-6504Date:4/18/2011ItemTotalCostMeasureANoProjectName/LimitsProjectType($000’s)Funds($000s)’1CityWideSlurrySeal&OverlayPavementRehabilitation1,0006002MurrietaRoadImprovementsoverSunsetStormDrain&NewPavement150150Total1,150750
RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATIONCOMMISSIONMEASURE‘A”LOCALSTREETSANDROADSPROGRAMFY2013-2014Agency:CityofPerrisPage3of5Preparedby:HabibMotlaghPhone#:(951)943-6504Date:4/18/2011ItemTotalCostMeasureANoProjectName/LimitsProjectType($000’s)Funds($000’s)PlacentiaAvenueImprovements(1-215toIndian)NewPavement600500GoetzRoadImprovementsIntersectionImprovements&Widening200100MiscellaneousPaving&Widening(CityWide)500300Total1,300900
RiVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATIONCOMMISSIONMEASURE‘A’LOCALSTREETSANDROADSPROGRAMFY2014-2015Agency:Page4of5Preparedby:Phone#:Date:CityofPerrisHabibMotlagh(951)943-65044/18/2011ItemTotalCostMeasureANoProjectName/LimitsProjectType($000’s)Funds($000’s)1SlurrySeal&Overlay(CityWide)PavementRehabilitation1,2006002Murrietaroad&MapesRoadPavingNewPavement1,0002001ITotal2,200800
RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATIONCOMMISSIONMEASURE‘A”LOCALSTREETSANDROADSPROGRAMFY2015-2016Agency:Page5of5Preparedby:Phone#:Date:CityofPerrisHabibMotlagh(951)943-65044/18/2011ItemTotalCostMeasureANoProjectName/LimitsProjectType($000’s)Funds($000’s)1SlurrySeal&Overlay(CityWide)PavementRehabiltiation1,2009002)ITotal1,200900
Agency: City of San JacintoPage 1 of 1Prepared by: Habib MotlaghPhone #:(951) 943-6504Date: 4/18/2011Item Total Cost Measure A EstimatedNo. Project Name / Limits Project Type($000's)Funds ($000's)Completion Status1 2,500 500 2011 Partially Completed. Balance in Design, Expect Const. 20112 400 160 2011 / 2012 Preliminary Design UnderwayTotal 2,900 660 Esplanade Avenue from Warren Road to Mountain AvenuePavement RehabiltiationStreet ImprovementsDeAnza Avenue Pavement RehabilitationRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAMPROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2010-2011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAMFY 2011 - 2012Agency: City of San JacintoPage 1 of 3Prepared by: Habib MotlaghPhone #: (951) 943-6504Date: 4/18/2011ItemTotal Cost Measure ANo.Project Name / Limits Project Type ($000's) Funds ($000's)1620 500 2850 850 Total 1,470 1,350 Esplanade Avenue (Between Cawston & Sanderson)Ramona Expressway (Between Lake Park to Esplanade)Pavement RehabilitationPavement Rehabilitation
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAMFY 2012 - 2014 *Agency: City of San JacintoPage 2 of 3Prepared by: Habib MotlaghPhone #:(951) 943-6504Date: 4/18/2011ItemTotal Cost Measure ANo.Project Name / Limits Project Type($000's)Funds ($000's)1800 700 21,500 900 3 Miscellaneous Pavement Rehabilitation 300 100 Total 2,600 1,700 * Multi Year ProjectLyon Avenue / Ramona Blvd. (Adjacent to Lyon Basin)Warren Road Between Ramona Expressway and CottonwoodPavement RehabilitationPavement RehabilitationWidening, Curb, Sidewalk
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAMFY 2014 - 2016Agency: City of San JacintoPage 3 of 3Prepared by: Habib MotlaghPhone #:(951) 943-6504Date: 4/18/2011ItemTotal Cost Measure ANo.Project Name / Limits Project Type($000's)Funds ($000's)1 Miscellaneous Pavement Rehabilitation (City Wide) Pavement Rehabilitation 800 500 Total 800 500
Marsha Swanson, Mayor 23873 Clinton Keith Rd, Ste 201
Ben Benoit, Mayor Pro Tem Wildomar, CA 92595
Bob Cashman, Council Member 951.677.7751 Phone
Bridgette Moore, Council Member 951.698.1463 Fax
Timothy Walker, Council Member
Memorandum
To: Shirley Medina, RCTC
Fr: Diane Nguyen, Transportation Programs Manager
Re: Measure A Expenditure Plan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Please find attached the City of Wildomar’s 5-year Expenditure Plan. For questions, I can be reached below.
Diane Nguyen
Transportation Programs Manager
City of Wildomar
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 201
Wildomar, CA 92595
Cell. 951-970-9741
City of Wildomar
Measure A Expenditure Plan
Fiscal Year 2011/12 – 2015/16
City of Wildomar - Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2012-16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2011 - 2012
Agency: City of Wildomar
Page: 1 of 6
Prepared by: Tim D’Zmura, Public Works Director
Phone #: 951-677-7751
Date: May 19, 2011
Item
No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A
Funds
1
2
3
4
5
6
Accessibility Improvements
Program (various project
locations citywide)
Roadway Safety Improvements
Program (various project
locations citywide)
Slurry Seal Program (various
project locations citywide)
Unpaved Roadway
Enhancements Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Citywide Maintenance Program
8% Overhead / Admin Line Item
Sidewalk, ramps,
repairs, pedestrian and
ADA improvements
Remove, replace, install
signs, pavement
markings, related
roadway safety
improvements
Remove, Repair, Crack
Fill, Slurry Seal as
needed
Repair or reconstruct
unpaved roadways
Right-of-way
maintenance and repair
to include but not
limited to: striping,
stenciling; repairs to
streets and
culvert/drainage
facilities; storm
damage/flood control
projects; widening
streets
Inter Transfer Funds
$20,000
$50,000
$155,000
$33,000
$127,000
$34,000
$20,000
$50,000
$155,000
$33,000
$127,000
$34,000
TOTAL Measure A Funds: $419,000
Note: The City of Wildomar’s FY 10/11 projected allocation is $29,000 higher than what was
programmed in the adopted FY 10/11 Measure A Expenditure Plan. This amount is included in the
above figures with the FY 11/12 M easure A allocation of $390,000, resulting in a programming total
of $419,000.
City of Wildomar - Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2012-16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2012 - 2013
Agency: City of Wildomar
Page: 2 of 6
Prepared by: Tim D’Zmura, Public Works Director
Phone #: 951-677-7751
Date: May 19, 2011
Item
No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A
Funds
1
2
3
4
5
6
Accessibility Improvements
Program (various project
locations citywide)
Roadway Safety
Improvements Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Slurry Seal Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Unpaved Roadway
Enhancements Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Citywide Maintenance
Program
8% Overhead / Admin Line
Item
Sidewalk, ramps, repairs,
pedestrian and ADA
improvements
Remove, replace, install signs,
pavement markings, related
roadway safety improvements
Remove, Repair, Crack Fill,
Slurry Seal as needed
Repair or reconstruct unpaved
roadways
Right-of-way maintenance and
repair to include but not limited
to: striping, stenciling; repairs
to streets and culvert/drainage
facilities; storm damage/flood
control projects; widening
streets
Inter Transfer Funds
$20,000
$50,000
$155,000
$50,000
$112,000
$32,000
$20,000
$50,000
$155,000
$33,000
$112,000
$32,000
TOTAL Measure A Funds: $402,000
City of Wildomar - Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2012-16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2013 - 2014
Agency: City of Wildomar
Page: 3 of 6
Prepared by: Tim D’Zmura, Public Works Director
Phone #: 951-677-7751
Date: May 19, 2011
Item
No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A
Funds
1
2
3
4
5
6
Accessibility Improvements
Program (various project
locations citywide)
Roadway Safety
Improvements Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Slurry Seal Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Unpaved Roadway
Enhancements Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Citywide Maintenance
Program
8% Overhead / Admin Line
Item
Sidewalk, ramps, repairs,
pedestrian and ADA
improvements
Remove, replace, install signs,
pavement markings, related
roadway safety improvements
Remove, Repair, Crack Fill,
Slurry Seal as needed
Repair or reconstruct unpaved
roadways
Right-of-way maintenance and
repair to include but not limited
to: striping, stenciling; repairs
to streets and culvert/drainage
facilities; storm damage/flood
control projects; widening
streets
Inter Transfer Funds
$20,000
$50,000
$155,000
$50,000
$123,000
$33,000
$20,000
$50,000
$155,000
$33,000
$123,000
$33,000
TOTAL Measure A Funds: $414,000
City of Wildomar - Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2012-16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2014 - 2015
Agency: City of Wildomar
Page: 4 of 6
Prepared by: Tim D’Zmura, Public Works Director
Phone #: 951-677-7751
Date: May 19, 2011
Item
No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A
Funds
1
2
3
4
5
6
Accessibility Improvements
Program (various project
locations citywide)
Roadway Safety
Improvements Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Slurry Seal Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Unpaved Roadway
Enhancements Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Citywide Maintenance
Program
8% Overhead / Admin Line
Item
Sidewalk, ramps, repairs,
pedestrian and ADA
improvements
Remove, replace, install signs,
pavement markings, related
roadway safety improvements
Remove, Repair, Crack Fill,
Slurry Seal as needed
Repair or reconstruct unpaved
roadways
Right-of-way maintenance and
repair to include but not limited
to: striping, stenciling; repairs
to streets and culvert/drainage
facilities; storm damage/flood
control projects; widening
streets
Inter Transfer Funds
$20,000
$50,000
$155,000
$50,000
$134,000
$34,000
$20,000
$50,000
$155,000
$33,000
$134,000
$34,000
TOTAL Measure A Funds: $426,000
City of Wildomar - Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2012-16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FY 2015 - 2016
Agency: City of Wildomar
Page: 5 of 6
Prepared by: Tim D’Zmura, Public Works Director
Phone #: 951-677-7751
Date: May 19, 2011
Item
No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A
Funds
1
2
3
4
5
6
Accessibility Improvements
Program (various project
locations citywide)
Roadway Safety
Improvements Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Slurry Seal Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Unpaved Roadway
Enhancements Program
(various project locations
citywide)
Citywide Maintenance
Program
8% Overhead / Admin Line
Item
Sidewalk, ramps, repairs,
pedestrian and ADA
improvements
Remove, replace, install signs,
pavement markings, related
roadway safety improvements
Remove, Repair, Crack Fill,
Slurry Seal as needed
Repair or reconstruct unpaved
roadways
Right-of-way maintenance and
repair to include but not limited
to: striping, stenciling; repairs
to streets and culvert/drainage
facilities; storm damage/flood
control projects; widening
streets
Inter Transfer Funds
$20,000
$50,000
$155,000
$50,000
$146,000
$35,000
$20,000
$50,000
$155,000
$33,000
$146,000
$35,000
TOTAL Measure A Funds: $439,000
"
R I V E R S I D E
C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
J u n e 2 7 , 2 0 1 1
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
S h i r l e y M e d i n a , P r o g r a m m i n g a n d P l a n n i n g M a n a g e r
T h e r e s i a T r e v i n o , C h i e f F i n a n c i a l O f f i c e r
T H R O U G H :
A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A P r o g r a m M a i n t e n a n c e o f E f f o r t
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N _
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
1 ) A p p r o v e t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A M a i n t e n a n c e o f E f f o r t ( M O E ) b a s e y e a r l e v e l s
f o r e a c h l o c a l a g e n c y ;
2 ) A p p r o v e t h e c i t y o f R i v e r s i d e ' s ( R i v e r s i d e ) r e q u e s t f o r s p e c i a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n
r e g a r d i n g i t s 2 0 0 9 M O E b a s e y e a r l e v e l ; a n d
3 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
M e a s u r e A i m p o s e s s e v e r a l r e q u i r e m e n t s o n l o c a l a g e n c i e s i n o r d e r t o r e c e i v e l o c a l
s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s f u n d s . T h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A o r d i n a n c e c o n t i n u e d t h e
r e q u i r e m e n t f o r l o c a l a g e n c i e s t o m a i n t a i n t h e c u r r e n t c o m m i t m e n t o f l o c a l
d i s c r e t i o n a r y e x p e n d i t u r e s t o w a r d t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d m a i n t e n a n c e
a c t i v i t i e s . T h i s r e q u i r e m e n t i s t o e n s u r e t h a t M e a s u r e A f u n d s s u p p l e m e n t c u r r e n t
e x p e n d i t u r e s , n o t s u p p l a n t . I n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A o r d i n a n c e , i f
l o c a l a g e n c i e s d o n o t m e e t t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e M O E b a s e y e a r l e v e l i n a g i v e n y e a r ,
M e a s u r e A L o c a l S t r e e t s a n d R o a d s d i s b u r s e m e n t s w i l l b e w i t h h e l d t h e f o l l o w i n g
y e a r .
A t i t s J u l y 2 0 1 0 m e e t i n g , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d t h e M O E g u i d e l i n e s d e v e l o p e d
b y s t a f f a n d t h e T e c h n i c a l A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e ( T A C ) . T h e g u i d e l i n e s a l s o
i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e 2 0 0 9 M O E b a s e y e a r l e v e l s w o u l d b e
a p p l i c a b l e t o F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 . F o r t h e f i r s t t w o y e a r s o f t h e 2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A p r o g r a m
( i . e . , F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 a n d F Y 2 0 1 0 / 1 1 ) , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d t h e u s e o f t h e 1 9 8 9
M e a s u r e A M O E b a s e y e a r a m o u n t s , o r t h e P r o p o s i t i o n 4 2 M O E a m o u n t f o r c i t i e s
i n c o r p o r a t e d i n o r a f t e r 1 9 8 9 .
A g e n d a I t e m 9
2 3
The 2009 Measure A MOE annual certification process is as follows:
• Local agencies complete the MOE report template to include discretionary
general fund expenditures for construction and maintenance activities for the
reporting year.
• General ledger documentation/forms must be submitted as an attachment to
the MOE report template.
• MOE reports will be submitted to the Commission's auditor.
• Commission staff will report to the TAC and Commission regarding the
outcome of the auditor's findings regarding agencies meeting the MOE base
year levels.
• Local agencies that do not meet the MOE base year may submit a request
for special consideration, which will be presented to the Commission.
The newly incorporated cities of Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Menifee, and Wildomar
are eligible to receive Measure A Local Streets and Roads funding upon notice of
participation in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan and participation in the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee program. These cities will be required to determine their respective
MOE base year levels to meet the MOE certification requirement after the third year
of incorporation.
After reviewing the MOE base year submittals, staff has accepted the
methodologies for some of the local agencies, as indicated in the attachment. For
the remaining local agencies, staff will continue to work with them to resolve any
inconsistencies or questions pertaining to their proposed base year level and
supporting documentation.
Special Consideration Request
Upon submitting the 2009 MOE base year level, Riverside requested special
consideration, allowed under the MOE guidelines, for approval to establish its MOE
requirement at the 1989 Measure A MOE base year level of $12,449,203 in lieu of
the 2009 MOE base year level calculated as $16,997,233. The calculation method
for determining the 2009 Measure A base year level is based on general fund
expenditures for construction and maintenance activities during FY 2009/10.
Riverside stated that because of the Riverside Renaissance program, a five-year
infrastructure investment, expenditures used to calculate the 2009 MOE base year
created a high MOE base year level that cannot be maintained since the Riverside
Renaissance program was not intended to continue beyond the five-year
investment period. Riverside also referenced that it .exceeded the MOE base year
requirement under the 1989 Measure A by more than $46 million, and that the
$12.45 million amount more accurately reflects Riverside's historic level of
discretionary expenditures.
Agenda Item 9
•
24
"
2 0 0 9 M e a s u r e A M O E B a s e Y e a r s
2 0 0 9 M O E B a s e Y e a r s R e c o m m e n d e d f o r
" "
A T T A C H M E N T
W e s t e r n C o u n t y
-
1 9 8 9 M O E
- . - - -
P r o p o s e d
2 0 0 9 M O E
- - - - . . _ . _ . . . _ _ . . . .
R O T C
A d j u s t m e n t s
R e c o m m e n d e d
2 0 0 9 M O E
C o m m e n t s
B a n n i n g
1 6 4 , 3 2 5
3 1 6 , 1 8 1
3 1 6 , 1 8 1
g e a t + m i t ' , i
r . . . I .
, , x ' b . 7 4 2
r + , , : N I A h . - . , , :
N I A y . , .
i .
N y A i ' �
t i e s
i i A 1 G ��Y A r ��/ I ��a s A ( L S R f u i r d ` ( >
C a n y o n L a k e
6 , 0 6 3
2 8 , 5 7 3
-
2 8 , 8 7 3
. t i
C o r o n a
1 , 7 8 4 , 3 9 9
2 , 2 0 7 , 9 4 4
2 5 6
2 , 2 0 8 , 2 0 0
^
4 7 . 1
} i 1 d " , { ` 'v / X �� {
l f t T ^
��( )
i �� L ( N i 9 :
G - ` f I y y
t F 3
s
q 2
t
I I ;
A _ t P
I Y $ ��v c i r n l a Y - " ��' P ��I s r y a - c , ��i
( t
I
i T t '
f
, ����� 5 2 : + . ' . . ��}
L a k e E l s i n o r e
5 0 3 , 3 3 9
9 6 0 , 7 7 1
9 6 0 , 7 7 1
o ����l ` , A ��. . .
; 1
1 1 , s a N 1 % + 4 , ,
1
. i ! f / , ��
��
��
; i . , ' " 1 . " 1 , 7 , : 4
M o r e n o V a l l e y
9 4 3 , 1 4 3
1 , 4 5 9 , 1 5 3
-
1 , 4 5 9 , 1 5 3
M u r r l e t a
5 2 , 6 2 5
5 9 5 , 7 0 2
5 9 5 , 7 0 2
N o r c o
1 , 2 5 9
2 2 , 5 3 6
-
2 2 , 5 3 6
P e r r i s
3 9 9 , 9 4 5
1 , 1 7 2 , 5 7 1
4 5 , 8 9 9
1 , 2 1 8 , 4 7 0
R i v e r s i d e
1 2 , 4 4 9 , 2 0 3
1 6 , 9 9 7 , 2 3 3
( 4 , 5 4 8 , 0 3 0 )
1 2 , 4 4 9 , 2 0 3
R e q u e s t i n g S p e c i a l C o n s i d e r a t i o n
T e m e c u l a
2 , 7 8 5 0 3 4
1 , 4 3 1 , 7 9 9
-
1 , 4 3 1 , 7 9 9
V i r S i d l t t ��n ` ����, +
, ' 1 1 u , ` ��i ' i i A ' a ��, l - ��, r N A
��' ' L E I . 7 8 ' . �� /
A ��- a
. P ��[ A ; ��; ��j '
' i 1 ��7 { f } ; ! i ` . ��i ` S ' ' A , i (
r . t i i V e t , . w . ��a i
E a s t e r n C o u n t y
D e s e r t H o t S p r i n g s
5 7 , 5 8 6
7 5 , 1 4 7
-
7 5 , 1 4 7
I n d i a n W e l l s
5 5 , 9 6 2
9 6 3 , 6 4 0
-
9 6 3 , 6 4 0
I n d i o
4 6 5 , 7 6 3
2 , 0 4 8 , 5 6 4
-
2 , 0 4 8 , 5 6 4
0 4 , 4 4 a
�
N A ' i
N / A s i .
, + '
N A a
t i f V , d t i e d ' g t t ��i S 9 r ' 5 , , i L 5 i � u n j s
, 4
P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y
! B l y t h e
U n i n c o r p o r a t e d .
I
4 7 5 , 6 7 7 I 5 2 0 , 1 9 2
5 2 0 , 1 9 2
1 f i i 0 : .
I �
1 0 0 4 1 0 0 : : : 0 1 1 -
d i t u r e s ' ��! , 7 ;
2 0 0 9 M O E B a s e Y e a r s - R e c o m m e n d e d f o r A p p r o v a l a t f u t u
W e s t e r n C o u n t y
1 9 8 9 M O E
P r o p o s e d
2 0 0 9 M O E
R C T C o
A d j u s t m e n t s
R e c o m m e n d e d
2 0 0 9 M O E .
C o m m e n t s
: C a l m 7 e S a . . . , . .
2 9 4 P
- F o l l O W U P
X C i t y
$ 3 ) 6 0 5
" ` i
' , ,
�� ' , >
6 1 t 0 i g i M A P
i f f l '
- 1
r .
$ a n J a c + n G o �
' . _ 3 4 7 .
; - ��' r , y
i ' ? ' ` i '
: r . ,
.
R 4 I l 4 C u r c
E a s t e r n C o u n t y
W o o f
l " I , ��a l j 5
2 6
"
s ' 4 f
, p l y i
V d r m a j
N l
' f 3
p , ' ; ' Y i 7 t a 8 e l i a r , e
i ��r 9 ��1 d 1
1 1 ������
l i d ' '
k t ��S T s i
������,
d i
s
����
d )
1 S f i b & " C
���� ^ ��
W T S
r 8 u S
1 (
m .
��
( I V I
i l ��
r
8
{ . s ` X `
( 1 ��t m ' 7 ' S ��a
, i i ��f i ����i
: 6 i d
�� �� i d s
_ + * 9
' ��" � , , m ' ��' a i i ��i
�� w . .
. , i " ? ' . ����& ��' i
d k i M d C
r I ' l ( ' ��
��i i i i !
i .
i . m '
ATTACHMENT
Office of the
City Manager
May 11, 2011
Ms. Anne Mayer
Executive Director
Riverside County Transportation Commission
4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
IN, MAY 7 2011 U
RTIANSPOAION COMMISSION
Re: Request for Special Consideration for 2009 Measure A Maintenance of Effort Requirements
The City of Riverside is requesting the Riverside County Transportation Commission grant the
City of Riverside special consideration and establish the City's 2009 Measure A Maintenance of
Effort (MOE) requirement at the 1989 level of $12,449,203 in lieu of the proposed $16,997,223.
As you know, renewal of Measure A in 2009 required resetting the MOE baseline which
unfortunately occurred in the middle of the City of Riverside's Renaissance Program, which was
a five year investment in the City's infrastructure. Consequently, the City's level of
discretionary spending on street maintenance was at an unsustainable level during the years
proposed by RCTC to be used to establish the MOE base year.
The Renaissance program is now coming to an end and the City's discretionary expenditures for
all programs including street maintenance, will be returning to historic levels. Unfortunately, the
historic levels are below the Commission proposed 2009 MOE for the City.
Since the original MOE in 1988, the City has exceeded the MOE requirement for discretionary
street maintenance expenditures. Over the life of the original Measure, street maintenance
expenditures totaled $295 million, or more than $46 million over the $249 million MOE
requirement (see attached). The requested MOE amount more accurately reflects the City's
historic level of discretionary expenditures for street maintenance and would still be more than
five times greater than the next highest Agency's requirement, the City of Corona at $2,207,944.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951-826-5552 or Tom Boyd at
951-826-5575.
Sincerely,
Deanna Lorson
Assistant City Manager
Attachment, Historic MOE vs expenditures
cc Siobhan Foster, Public Works Director
3900 Main Street • Riverside, CA 92522 • 951.826.5553 • vwwsiversideca.yov
X.29.18
28
1
•
"
R I V E R S / D E
C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
J u n e 2 7 , 2 0 1 1
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
F i n a C l e m e n t e , T r a n s i t M a n a g e r
T H R O U G H :
R o b e r t Y a t e s , M u l t i m o d a l S e r v i c e s D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s i t S e r v i c e s F u n d i n g A l l o c a t i o n f o r F i s c a l
Y e a r 2 0 1 1 / 1 2
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
1 ) C o n d u c t a p u b l i c h e a r i n g a t t h e J u l y C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g o n t h e p r o p o s e d
S e c t i o n 5 3 0 7 P r o g r a m o f P r o j e c t s ( P O P ) ;
2 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 F e d e r a l T r a n s i t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ' s ( F T A ) S e c t i o n
5 3 0 7 a n d 5 3 1 1 P O P f o r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ;
3 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 L o c a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n F u n d ( L T F ) a n d S t a t e T r a n s i t
A s s i s t a n c e ( S T A ) f u n d a l l o c a t i o n s f o r t r a n s i t ;
4 ) D i r e c t s t a f f t o a d d p r o j e c t s i n t o t h e R e g i o n a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t
P l a n ( R T I P ) ;
5 ) A d o p t R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 1 - 0 1 1 , " R e s o l u t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n t o A l l o c a t e S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e F u n d s " ; a n d
6 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
T h r o u g h t h e a n n u a l S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n ( S R T P ) p r o c e s s , t r a n s i t o p e r a t i n g a n d
c a p i t a l s u b s i d i e s c o n s i s t i n g o f f e d e r a l , s t a t e , a n d l o c a l r e v e n u e s a r e a l l o c a t e d t o
e i g h t t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s p r o v i d i n g p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . A t i t s
J u n e 8 m e e t i n g , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d t h e F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 - F Y 2 0 1 3 / 1 4 S R T P s
i n c o n c e p t f o r t h e c i t i e s o f B a n n i n g , B e a u m o n t , C o r o n a , R i v e r s i d e , t h e
C o m m i s s i o n ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l P r o g r a m , P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( P V V T A ) ,
R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( R T A ) ; a n d S u n L i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ( S u n L i n e ) . T h e S R T P s
i d e n t i f y e a c h a g e n c y ' s o p e r a t i n g a n d c a p i t a l n e e d s , f u n d i n g s o u r c e s , c o n s o l i d a t e d
f i n a n c i a l p l a n , a n d p r o v i d e t h e f r a m e w o r k r e q u i r e d t o c o m p l y w i t h f e d e r a l
r e g u l a t i o n s , t h e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e v e l o p m e n t A c t ( T D A ) , s t a t e l a w , a n d
C o m m i s s i o n - a d o p t e d g u i d e l i n e s a n d p o l i c i e s . T h e a n n u a l S R T P u p d a t e s p r o v i d e a
t h r e e - y e a r o u t l o o k f o r s e r v i c e i m p r o v e m e n t s , p l a n n i n g a c t i v i t i e s , a n d c a p i t a l
p r o g r a m s . A s t h e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n n i n g a g e n c y , t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s r e s p o n s i b l e
f o r a l l o c a t i o n o f t r a n s i t f u n d s , p e r f o r m a n c e m o n i t o r i n g , a n d o p e r a t o r o v e r s i g h t .
T h e a p p r o v e d S R T P s p r o v i d e t h e b a s i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s o v e r s i g h t a c t i v i t i e s t o
A g e n d a I t e m 1 0
3 0
help establish system policy, determine appropriate service goals, and provide
management with the necessary information to efficiently operate bus and rail
services in the county. Primary guidance for the Commission is to use capital and
operating funds in a manner that balances the need to be effective and efficient
with the need to provide high quality service.
In January 2011, the Commission received information on the FY 2011/12 revenue
projections, which indicated an increase of approximately 8% in both LTF and in
Measure A funding compared to the FY 2010/11 original estimates. Additionally,
in June 2010, the county received $12.8 million through the fuel tax swap relief
package to cover the lost STA funding in FY 2009/10 and FY 2010/1 1. In January
2011, the California State Controller's office also released the STA preliminary
allocation estimates for the region for FY 2011/12 signifying the return of STA
funding for transit. These recent increases in transit revenues provided a
substantial capital revenue stream allowing the public operators to start
implementing the planned capital procurements that have been limited or placed on
hold for the last two years.
SRTP Financial and Ridership Overview
Based on submitted SRTPs for FY 2011/12, it is estimated that $212 million in
total funding is required to support the operating and capital requests for the
provision of Riverside County transit services. The following table provides an
overview of the total operating and capital costs together with projected ridership
levels by apportionment area.
Table 1 - FY 2011/12 Operating, Capital and Ridership Projections
E
Expense Type
Western Riverside
Coachella
Valle Y
Palo Verde
ValleyTotal
Bus
Rail
Operating
Capital
$ 61,910,350
26,714,305
$ 16,789,900
35,556,255
$ 22,177,354
14,351,473
$ 960,322
665,297
$ 101,837,926
77,287,330
Total (Operating & Capital)
$ 88,624,655
$ 52,346,155
$ 36,528,827
$1,625,619
$179,125,256
Leverage of Commuter
Rail Funds"
$ 32 703100
$ 32,703,100
GRAND TOTAL
$ 88,624,655
$ 85,049,255
$ 36,528,827
$1,625,619
$ 211,828,356
FY 2011/12 Projected
Ridership
8,763,487
3,046,910
4,108,203
42,812
15,961,412
' LA Metro, OCTA & SANBAG's share and passenger fare revenues for Commuter Rail expenses
Agenda Item 10
•
31
"
T h e o v e r a l l e c o n o m i c c l i m a t e r e m a i n e d c o n s t r a i n e d , c o n s e q u e n t l y i m p a c t i n g
c o n t i n u e d g r o w t h i n r i d e r s h i p . A t t a c h m e n t 4 s h o w s t h e f u n d i n g p l a n f o r
F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 , w h i c h i s p r o j e c t e d t o g e n e r a t e a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 6 m i l l i o n i n r i d e r s h i p ,
s l i g h t l y 2 % h i g h e r t h a n t h e F Y 2 0 1 0 / 1 1 e s t i m a t e d r i d e r s h i p .
F u n d i n g l e v e l s f o r n e x t y e a r ' s t r a n s i t o p e r a t i o n s r e f l e c t a s y s t e m w i d e i n c r e a s e o f
1 2 % i n t o t a l o p e r a t i n g e x p e n s e s a n d a s i g n i f i c a n t j u m p o f 1 2 2 % i n c a p i t a l
e x p e n d i t u r e s d u e t o t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f m a j o r v e h i c l e p u r c h a s e s f u n d e d w i t h a
c o m b i n a t i o n o f s t a t e , l o c a l a n d f e d e r a l s o u r c e s a s w e l l a s w i t h a v a i l a b l e f u n d
r e s e r v e s .
F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 O p e r a t i n g a n d C a p i t a l C o s t s
T o i m p l e m e n t t h e S R T P s f o r F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 , t h e r e q u e s t i s t o u t i l i z e a p p r o x i m a t e l y
$ 1 0 2 m i l l i o n f o r o p e r a t i n g a n d $ 7 7 m i l l i o n f o r c a p i t a l i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e
$ 3 2 . 7 m i l l i o n s h a r e f r o m L o s A n g e l e s M e t r o p o l i t a n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y
( M e t r o ) , O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( O C T A ) , a n d S a n B e r n a r d i n o
A s s o c i a t e d G o v e r n m e n t s ( S A N B A G ) t o l e v e r a g e t h e C o m m u t e r R a i l P r o g r a m . T h e
c h a r t b e l o w p r o v i d e s a n o v e r v i e w o f t h e o p e r a t i n g a n d c a p i t a l c o s t s b y f u n d i n g
s o u r c e r e q u i r e d t o p r o v i d e t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y .
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y : F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 O P E R A T I N G a n d C A P I T A L C O S T S
T D A ( L T F & S T A F u n d s ) ;
$ 7 3 , 0 3 8 , 6 5 8 , 3 4 %
C a r r y O v e r F u n d s
( S T A / 5 3 0 9 / T U M F / P r o p
1 B / L T F / S e c 5 3 1 6 ) ,
$ 6 , 5 6 7 , 7 5 4 , 3 %
A d d ' t l R a i l O p e r a t i n g
S u b s i d y p a i d b y : S A N B A G ;
O C T A & L A M e t r o ,
$ 1 8 , 0 2 7 , 8 0 0 ; 8 %
O t h e r R e v e n u e s ,
$ 3 , 5 6 2 , 2 7 4 , 2 %
A g e n d a I t e m 1 0
P a s s e n g e r F a r e s ,
$ 3 4 , 5 0 2 , 7 7 1 , 1 6 %
S e c 5 3 1 6 & 5 3 1 7 ,
$ 1 , 1 9 4 , 7 1 7 , 1 %
M e a s u r e A , $ 1 1 , 7 5 7 , 3 7 0 ,
6 % '
F e d e r a l F o r m u l a F u n d s
( S e c 5 3 0 7 & 5 3 1 1 ) ,
, $ 2 4 , 3 8 4 , 0 4 2 , 1 2 %
F e d e r a l - D i s c r e t i o n a r y
F u n d s ( S e c 5 3 0 9 ) ,
c $ 2 5 , 2 0 8 , 0 0 0 , 1 2 %
P r o p 1 1 3 ( C a p + S e c u r i t y ) ,
$ 1 3 , 5 8 4 , 9 7 0 , 6 %
3 2
Of the $212 million operating and capital costs identified in the chart,
approximately $63 million (30%) is derived from:'
• Passenger fares ($34.5 million);
• Commuter rail member agencies' revenue share ($18 million);
• Carryover funds — LTF/STA/Proposition 1 B/5307/5309/5316/TUMF ($6.6
million); and
• Miscellaneous other revenues — bus shelter advertising, general fund
contributions, Transportation Reimbursement and Information Project (TRIP)
revenue, alternate fuel rebates, Metrolink transfer fares, SCRRA pass -
through funds for security guards, passthrough funds from Commuter
Assistance for the Perris Station Transit Center, CNG sales, CaIPERS
reimbursement, federal excise tax credit, and interest income ($3.6 million).
The remaining balance of approximately $149 million (70%) consists of federal,
state, and local funds (including Proposition 1 B funding) that are allocated through
Commission action.
Transportation Development Act Funding
The TDA provides two funding sources: LTF and STA for transit capital, operations,
and planning. The LTF funds are derived from quarter cent of the state retail sales
tax collected in each county. The State Board of Equalization returns the sales tax
revenues to the county of Riverside where it is held until the Commission provides
written allocation instructions for disbursement. It is estimated that LTF revenue
for transit services for FY 2011/12 will be $52,784,515, reflecting an 8% increase
compared to the original projected amount for FY 2010/11, and is consistent with
the revenue projection provided at the January 2011 Commission meeting.
The STA funds are a portion of gasoline sales tax revenues that are appropriated by
the state legislature to the state public transportation account for transit purposes.
These funds are allocated to the region based on share of population and share of
fare revenues generated in each area during the prior fiscal year. In March 2009,
the STA funding for transit was completely eliminated by the state; however,
through the fuel tax swap legislation signed into law by the Governor in March
2010, Riverside County received about $12.8 million of the $400 million allocation
for FYs 2009/10 and 2010/11. The legislative agreement is also expected to
dedicate the diesel sales tax revenue stream to the Public Transportation Account
on an ongoing basis, allowing the establishment of an estimated $350 million
annual STA program for the state. There is approximately $18 million in STA
unallocated reserve funds projected at the end of FY 2010/11. Additional revenues
of $9.5 million are anticipated in FY 2011/12 for a total available amount of $27.5
million. About $8 million of this fund balance will be utilized by Riverside County
operators for various capital projects in FY 2011/12. Prior to approving the STA
Agenda Item 10
•
33
"
a l l o c a t i o n s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n m u s t a d o p t t h e a t t a c h e d r e s o l u t i o n a s s p e c i f i e d i n t h e
T D A s t a t u t e s a n d C a l i f o r n i a C o d e o f R e g u l a t i o n s . T o e n s u r e e f f i c i e n t u s e o f
e x i s t i n g c a p i t a l f u n d s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a l s o a d o p t e d r e v i s e d p o l i c i e s i n M a r c h
2 0 1 0 , r e q u i r i n g a l l o p e r a t o r s t o s p e n d d o w n e x i s t i n g c a p i t a l b a l a n c e s p r i o r t o
r e q u e s t i n g a d d i t i o n a l f u n d s .
I n o r d e r f o r t h e p u b l i c t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s t o c l a i m L T F a n d / o r S T A f u n d s , t h e
C o m m i s s i o n m u s t a l l o c a t e f u n d s t o s u p p o r t t h e t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s a n d c a p i t a l p r o j e c t s
c o n t a i n e d i n t h e F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 S R T P s . T h e r e q u e s t e d a l l o c a t i o n s a r e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h
t h e a p p r o v e d S R T P s , a n d t h e f u n d s a r e e x p l i c i t l y f o r t h e p r o j e c t s s t a t e d i n t h e
a p p r o v e d p l a n s . T h e T D A a l l o c a t i o n s f o r F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 r e q u e s t e d b y e a c h o p e r a t o r
a r e o u t l i n e d i n A t t a c h m e n t 3 .
P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B F u n d i n g
A p p r o v e d b y C a l i f o r n i a v o t e r s i n N o v e m b e r 2 0 0 6 , P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B a u t h o r i z e s t h e
s a l e o f $ 2 0 b i l l i o n i n s t a t e g e n e r a l o b l i g a t i o n b o n d s f o r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p u r p o s e s :
S a l e o f t h e b o n d s i s s u b j e c t t o a n n u a l a p p r o p r i a t i o n s i n t h e s t a t e b u d g e t a n d i s
e x p e c t e d t o b e s p r e a d a c r o s s s e v e r a l f i s c a l y e a r s . B o n d p r o c e e d s a r e t o f u n d
v a r i o u s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o g r a m s , i n c l u d i n g t h e P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B P u b l i c T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ,
M o d e r n i z a t i o n , I m p r o v e m e n t , a n d S e r v i c e E n h a n c e m e n t ( C a p i t a l ) p r o g r a m
a d m i n i s t e r e d b y C a ! t r a n s a n d t h e C a l i f o r n i a T r a n s i t S e c u r i t y G r a n t P r o g r a m
m a n a g e d b y t h e C a l i f o r n i a E m e r g e n c y M a n a g e m e n t A g e n c y ( C a l E M A ) .
F o r F Y 2 0 1 0 / 1 1 , R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y w a s a p p r o p r i a t e d a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 1 . 8 m i l l i o n i n
P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B S e c u r i t y f u n d s a n d a b o u t $ 4 4 . 6 m i l l i o n i n P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B C a p i t a l
f u n d s t o c o v e r a t h r e e - y e a r s p e n d i n g p l a n f o r F Y 2 0 1 0 / 1 1 F Y 2 0 1 2 / 1 3 .
A l t h o u g h e a c h r e g i o n i s g u a r a n t e e d a s h a r e o f P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B f u n d s b y f o r m u l a ,
t h e s e f u n d s w i l l b e d i s t r i b u t e d a s b o n d s a r e s o l d . I t i s u n k n o w n w h e n t h e s e f u n d s
w i l l b e a v a i l a b l e a n d w h a t t h e e x a c t a m o u n t a v a i l a b l e w i l l b e f r o m y e a r t o y e a r .
B e c a u s e o f t h e u n c e r t a i n t y w h e n t h e f u n d s a r e d i s t r i b u t e d , n o t a l l t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s
p r o g r a m m e d t h e i r s h a r e o f t h e f u n d s f o r t h i s c o m i n g f i s c a l y e a r .
O u t l i n e d b e l o w a r e a m o u n t s o f P r o p 1 B f u n d s p r o g r a m m e d b y a g e n c i e s f o r
F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 :
P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B
A g e n c y C a p i t a l S e c u r i t y
C i t y o f C o r o n a $ $ 3 8 , 4 4 8
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e 4 7 5 , 0 0 0
C o m m u t e r R a i l 1 , 9 0 0 , 0 0 0 3 5 0 , 2 8 0
S u n L i n e 9 , 8 7 0 , 8 6 8 3 9 4 , 9 2 7
P V V T A 5 3 4 , 0 7 9 2 1 , 3 6 8
T o t a l $ 1 2 , 7 7 9 , 9 4 7 $ 8 0 5 , 0 2 3
A g e n d a I t e m 1 0
3 4
The Proposition 1 B program does not require agencies to provide matching funds.
The city of Riverside and PVVTA programmed their Proposition 1 B FY 2010/1 1
capital allocation to purchase replacement vehicles. The Commission's Commuter
Rail will use $1.9 million toward the engineering and construction of the Perris
Valley Line (PVL) project, and SunLine will use all its Proposition 1 B Capital
allocation for three years toward the construction of its administrative building.
Approximately $805,000 in Proposition 1 B Security funds are programmed by the
city of Corona, Commission's Commuter Rail, SunLine, and PVVTA for various
transit security projects.
FY 2011/12 Federal Funds: Sections 5307, 5309, 5311, 5316 and 5317
Section 5307 Formula Funds
FTA's Section 5307 funds are allocated by formulas to each of the four urbanized
areas (UZA) in Riverside County, namely:
• Riverside/San Bernardino;
• Hemet/San Jacinto;
• Temecula/Murrieta; and
• Indio/Cathedral City/Palm Springs.
Attachment 2 is the proposed Section 5307 POP for Riverside County. The
Commission must develop and approve a POP for each UZA and conduct a public
hearing prior to an operator submitting its Section 5307 grant application to FTA.
If the draft POP is not amended through the public hearing process, the POP will
become final as presented and will be included in an approved RTIP, which is
subsequently forwarded to the Southern California Association of Governments for
review and processing. The Section 5307 requested funds by operator are shown
below:
FY 2011/12 Section 5307 Requested Funds
Agency Amount
City of Riverside 674,250
RTA 18, 298, 628
Commuter Rail 1,256,000
SunLine 3,464,390
Total $ 23,693,268
After a series of short-term continuing resolutions,.. the FTA released the final
apportionment notice in May 2011, announcing the availability of federal funding
for FY 2010/11. The actual Section 5307 apportionments for FY 2011/12 will not
be known until later this calendar year when final appropriations are made by
Agenda Item 10
35
"
C o n g r e s s . T h e P O P w a s d e v e l o p e d a t t h e h i g h e s t a n t i c i p a t e d f u n d i n g a m o u n t t o
a l l o w t h e o p e r a t o r s t o p r o c e e d w i t h t h e i r g r a n t a p p l i c a t i o n s a n d t o a v o i d d e l a y s
a s s o c i a t e d w i t h p r o g r a m a m e n d m e n t s s h o u l d t h e a c t u a l a p p o r t i o n m e n t s c o m e i n
l o w e r t h a n e s t i m a t e d . A n y e x c e s s f u n d s w i l l b e c a r r i e d o v e r t o t h e s u b s e q u e n t
f i s c a l y e a r a n d w i l l b e m a d e a v a i l a b l e t o c o v e r f u t u r e p r o j e c t s .
S e c t i o n 5 3 0 9 D i s c r e t i o n a r y F u n d s B u s a n d S m a l l S t a r t s
F T A S e c t i o n 5 3 0 9 B u s f u n d s a r e e a r m a r k e d b y C o n g r e s s a n d a r e d e s i g n a t e d f o r
p u b l i c t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s f o r c a p i t a l p r o j e c t s s u c h a s r e p l a c e m e n t o r e x p a n s i o n o f
b u s e s o r i m p r o v e m e n t o f b u s f a c i l i t i e s . F T A S e c t i o n 5 3 0 9 S m a l l S t a r t s a r e u s e d
f o r b u i l d i n g n e w r a i l , b u s r a p i d t r a n s i t o r e x t e n s i o n s t o e x i s t i n g s y s t e m s . F o r F Y
2 0 1 1 / 1 2 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l a n d t h e c i t y o f C o r o n a w i l l b e
p r o g r a m m i n g S e c t i o n 5 3 0 9 f u n d s t h a t w e r e p r e v i o u s l y a w a r d e d l a s t y e a r . T h e
C o m m i s s i o n ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l ' s S e c t i o n 5 3 0 9 e a r m a r k w i l l b e u s e d t o w a r d
e n g i n e e r i n g a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e P V L p r o j e c t w h i l e t h e c i t y o f C o r o n a w i l l b e
u s i n g i t s S e c t i o n 5 3 0 9 f u n d s f o r p r o c u r e m e n t o f f i x e d r o u t e b u s e s . T h e p r o j e c t s
m u s t b e i n c l u d e d i n a n a p p r o v e d R T I P b e f o r e t h e o p e r a t o r s c a n a c c e s s t h e s e f u n d s .
F Y 2 0 1 0 / 1 1 S e c t i o n 5 3 0 9 E a r m a r k s
A g e n c y
C i t y o f C o r o n a
C o m m i s s i o n ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l
T o t a l
S e c t i o n 5 3 1 1 F u n d s
A m o u n t
2 0 8 , 0 0 0
2 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 2 5 , 2 0 8 , 0 0 0
T h e F T A S e c t i o n 5 3 1 1 p r o g r a m a d m i n i s t e r e d b y C a l t r a n s i s d e s i g n e d t o p r o v i d e
f i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e t o e l i g i b l e l o c a l p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o v i d e r s i n r u r a l a r e a s a n d
c o m m u n i t i e s w i t h a p o p u l a t i o n o f l e s s t h a n 5 0 , 0 0 0 . T h e m a j o r i t y o f f u n d s a r e
p a s s e d t h r o u g h t o c o u n t i e s b a s e d o n a p o p u l a t i o n f o r m u l a . A n y r e m a i n i n g f u n d s
a r e a w a r d e d i n a s t a t e w i d e d i s c r e t i o n a r y p r o g r a m b y C a l t r a n s f o r r u r a l c a p i t a l
p r o j e c t s a n d i n t e r c i t y b u s p r o g r a m s . T h e f i n a n c i a l p l a n f o r t h i s y e a r ' s p r o g r a m
a s s u m e s t h e s a m e f u n d i n g l e v e l a s F Y 2 0 1 0 / 1 1 f o r t r a n s i t o p e r a t i o n s s i n c e t h e
a c t u a l a p p o r t i o n m e n t s w i l l n o t b e k n o w n u n t i l t h e f i n a l a p p r o p r i a t i o n s a r e r e l e a s e d .
B y p r o g r a m m i n g t h e s a m e l e v e l o f f u n d i n g , t h e o p e r a t o r s w i l l b e a b l e t o a p p l y f o r
m a x i m u m f u n d i n g a n d a v o i d d e l a y s t o a m e n d t h e i r p r o g r a m s .
T h e p r o g r a m a l l o c a t e s $ 6 9 0 , 7 7 4 i n f o r m u l a f u n d s f o r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , o f w h i c h
6 1 . 7 % w i l l b e a l l o c a t e d t o R T A a n d 3 8 . 3 % , f o r S u n L i n e . A s i n p r e v i o u s y e a r s ,
b o t h R T A a n d S u n L i n e i d e n t i f i e d t h e u s e o f S e c t i o n 5 3 1 1 f o r m u l a f u n d s f o r
o p e r a t i n g . T h e 6 1 . 7 % / 3 8 . 3 % f o r m u l a w a s a p p r o v e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n 1 9 8 7 ,
A g e n d a I t e m 1 0
3 6
and was based on the level of service each agency operated in the non-UZA of the
county. The Commission must develop and approve a Section 5311 POP before
grants are approved.
FY 2011 /12 Section 5311 Requested Funds
Agency
Amount % Allocation
RTA $ 426,208 61.7%
SunLine 264,566 38.3%
Total $ 690,774 100.0%
Section 5316 & 5317 Formula Funds
Authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation
Equity Act, a Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), two recent federal programs,
namely Section 5316 - Job Access Reverse Commute (JARC) and Section 5317
New Freedom (NF), were established to meet the transportation needs of the low-
income population, welfare recipients, and persons with disabilities. All projects
funded under this program must be derived from a locally developed, coordinated
public transit -human -services transportation planning process. RTA, SunLine, and
PVVTA were awarded federal FY 2008/09 and 2009/10 JARC and NF funding in
April 2011. These agencies are programming these funds for specialized transit
operations for FY 201 1 /12 and FY 2012/13. Funding allotments for FY 2011 /12
are as follows:
Agency Section 5316(JARC) Section 5317(NF)
RTA $ 815,065 $ 103,290
SunLine 119,057 101,475
PVVTA 38,620 17,210
Total $ 972,742 $ 221,975
These funds will be used to cover expenses for RTA's Commuter Link 212 and
217, extended fixed route services and travel training; SunLine's commuter service
to Banning and taxi voucher program; and PVVTA's mobility management program.
Summary
Staff recommendation is to approve the TDA and FTA funds as presented. Any
modifications in farebox revenues, federal grants, Measure A funding or carryover
funds may require operators to revise their services to operate within the available
funding.
Agenda Item 10
•
37
"
"
F i s c a l I m p a c t
T h e f u n d i n g a l l o c a t i o n s a r e b a s e d o n t h e r e v e n u e e s t i m a t e s d e v e l o p e d f o r t h e
F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 C o m m i s s i o n b u d g e t . T h e b u d g e t a d o p t e d a t t h e J u n e 8 C o m m i s s i o n
m e e t i n g i n c l u d e d $ 5 4 . 8 3 m i l l i o n i n L T F t r a n s i t o p e r a t i n g e x p e n d i t u r e s ,
$ 1 0 . 3 7 5 m i l l i o n i n L T F t r a n s i t c a p i t a l e x p e n d i t u r e s , a n d $ 2 0 . 3 m i l l i o n i n S T A
c a p i t a l e x p e n d i t u r e s . T h e s e b u d g e t e d e x p e n d i t u r e s , w h i c h i n c l u d e u s e o f p r i o r y e a r
c a p i t a l a l l o c a t i o n s , a r e e x p e c t e d t o b e f u n d e d b y F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 r e v e n u e s , a s w e l l a s
a v a i l a b l e f u n d b a l a n c e s . B a s e d o n t h e s e r e c o m m e n d e d a l l o c a t i o n s , n o b u d g e t
a d j u s t m e n t s a r e r e q u i r e d .
F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n
I n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t :
Y e s
Y e a r :
F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2
A m o u n t :
$ 6 5 , 0 5 3 , 5 1 5 ( L T F )
$ 7 , 9 8 5 , 1 4 3 ( S T A )
S o u r c e o f F u n d s :
T D A : L T F a n d S T A
B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t :
N o
G L A N o . :
L O C A L T R A N S P O R T A T I O N F U N D
S T A T E T R A N S I T A S S I S T A N C E
W e s t e r n C o u n t y B u s
W e s t e r n C o u n t y B u s
6 0 1 6 2 8 6 1 0 1 P 2 2 1 0 $ 3 3 , 1 7 2 , 5 8 2
6 0 1 6 2 8 6 1 0 2 P 2 2 1 0 $ 1 0 , 2 2 9 , 5 2 0
W e s t e r n C o u n t y R a i l
2 4 1 6 2 8 6 1 0 2 P 2 2 0 1 $ 5 , 0 9 6 , 1 5 8
C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y
2 4 1 6 2 8 6 1 0 2 P 2 2 0 2 $ 2 , 7 7 9 , 1 3 5
P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y
6 0 1 6 2 8 6 1 0 1 P 2 2 1 3 $ 1 0 , 5 8 4 , 5 0 0
C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y
2 4 1 6 2 8 6 1 0 2 P 2 2 0 3 $ 1 0 9 , 8 5 0
6 0 1 6 2 8 6 1 0 1 P 2 2 1 1 $ 1 0 , 2 5 8 , 5 9 6
P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y
6 0 1 6 2 8 6 1 0 1 P 2 2 1 2 $ 8 0 8 , 3 1 7
F i s c a l P r o c e d u r e s A p p r o v e d :
\ 1 4 4 1 A d e , 3 , 2 4 , 7 5 ,
D a t e :
0 6 / 1 5 / 1 1
A t t a c h m e n t s :
1 ) R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 1 - 0 1 1
2 ) S e c t i o n 5 3 0 7 P r o g r a m o f P r o j e c t s
3 ) T D A S p r e a d s h e e t s ( L T F a n d S T A )
4 ) F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2 a n d F Y 2 0 1 0 / 1 1 O p e r a t i n g a n d C a p i t a l R e q u e s t s a n d R i d e r s h i p
P r o j e c t i o n s
A g e n d a I t e m 1 0
3 8
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 11-011
A RESOLUTION OF THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TO ALLOCATE STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission is
designated the regional entity responsible for the allocation of State Transit
Assistance Funds within Riverside County; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission has
examined the Short Range Transit Plans and Transportation Improvement
Program; and
WHEREAS, all proposed expenditures in Riverside County are in
conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan; and
WHEREAS, the level of passenger fares is sufficient for claimants to
meet the fare revenue requirements of Public Utilities Code Sections
99268.2, 99268.3, 99268.4, 99268.5, and 99268.9, as applicable; and
WHEREAS, the claimant is making full use of federal funds available
under the Federal Transit Act; and
WHEREAS, the sum of the claimant's allocations from the state transit
assistance fund and from the local transportation fund does not exceed the
amount the claimant is eligible to receive during the fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, priority consideration has been given to claims to offset
reductions in federal operating assistance and the unanticipated increase in
the cost of fuel, to enhance existing public transportation services, and to
meet high priority regional, countywide, or area -wide public transportation
needs; and
WHEREAS, the public transit operators have made a reasonable effort
to implement the productivity improvements recommended pursuant to
Public Utilities Code Section 99244; and
WHEREAS, the claimant is not precluded by any contract entered into
on or after June 28, 1979, from employing part-time drivers or contracting
with common carriers or persons operating under a franchise or license; and
WHEREAS, operators are in full compliance with Section 18081.1 of
the Vehicle Code, as required in Public Utilities Code Section 99251.
39
ATTACHMENT 1
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County
Transportation Commission to allocate State Transit Assistance Funds for
FY 2011/12 as detailed in Attachment 3.
This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13`" day of July, 2011.
Gregory S. Pettis, Chair
Riverside County Transportation Commission
ATTEST:
Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board
Riverside County Transportation Commission
•
40
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
FTA SECTION 5307
FY 2011/12
URBANIZED AREA: RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO
Total Apportionment (Projection eased an FY1e-11Fed Register a InterCounty aloeanoa) Bus Rail Total
Apportionment (al based onFyranFunds released 5n01n) $ 10,500,595 $ 4,774,122 $ 15,274,717
Lapsing Funds (per FTA)
Carryover 5,962,253 1,809,635 7,771,888
Total Funds Available 16,462,848 6,583,757 23,046,605
Less Current Requests 11,122,878 1,256,000 12.378,878
Balance (Projected) $ 5,339,970 $ 5,327,757 $ 10,667,727
Sub Area Allocation
Riverside, City of - $ 674,250
Riverside Transit Agency 10,448,628
RCTC's Commuter Rail 1,256.000
TOTAL $ 12,378,878
NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
ATTACHMENT
Page 1 of 4
FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED
TOTAL AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT
Riverside, City of
1) Preventive Maintenance $ 350,000 $ 280,000 CapitauOperalino SCAG
2) 4 Vehicle Replacement 475,000 394,250 Capital SCAG.
TOTAL: City or Riverside $ 825,000 $ 674,250
Riverside Transit Agency
3) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance $ 9,187,500 $ 4,350,000 Capital/Operating SCAG
4) Capital Cost of Contracting 5,312,500 1,250,000 Capital SCAG
5) Revenue Vehicles - (3) Commutedink E-Lo's 524,794 419,835 Capital SCAG
6) Revenue Vehicles - (6) COFR E-Lo's 1,052,000 841,600 Capital SCAG
7) Revenue Vehicles - (17) DAR Type II's 1,318,451 1,094,314 Capital SCAG
8) Non -Revenue Vehicles - (9) Support Vehicles 135,791 108,633 Capital SCAG
9) Non -Revenue Vehicles - (3) S&Z Trucks 161,625 129,300 Capital SCAG
10) Capital Maintenance Spares 1,678,372 1,342,698 Capital SCAG
11) Capitalized Tire Lease 243,034 194,427 Capital SCAG
12) Facility Maintenance 897,276 717,821 Capital SCAG
TOTAL: Riverside Transit Agency $ 20,511,343 $ 10,448,628
RCTC's Commuter Rail
13) SCRRA Rehab/Renovation - FY 12 RCTC's share $ 1,256,000 $ 1,256,000 Capital SCAG
TOTAL: RCTC Rail $ 1,256,000'- $ 1,256,000
Approved: 7/13/2011 (Pending)
GRAND TOTAL $ 22,592,343 $ 12,378,878
VAJCIemenlel53gTPOP1Riv-San Bemardino1112SCAG.xIs
41
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 2 of 4
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
FTA SECTION 5307
FY 2011/12
URBANIZED AREA: HEMET/SAN JACINTO
RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY
Total Apportionment (Projected based on prior year actuals)
Apportionment $ 1,889,958
Carryover (estimate) 1,312,049
Transfer of Funds (CMAQ)
Total Funds Available 3,202,007
Less Current Requests 1,850,000
Balance (Projected) $ 1,352,007
TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED
NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT
1) Operating Assistance $ 26,385,883 $ 1,850,000 Operating Caltrans
TOTAL: $ 26,385,883 $ 1,850,000
Approved: 7/13/11 (pending)
V:1JCIemente153071P0P1Hemet - San Jacinto UZA11-12.x1s
42
"
"
"
A T T A C H M E N T
P a g e 3 o f 4
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
P R O G R A M O F P R O J E C T S
F T A S E C T I O N 5 3 0 7
F Y 2 0 1 1 / 1 2
U R B A N I Z E D A R E A : I N D I O / C A T H E D R A L C I T Y / P A L M S P R I N G S
R E C I P I E N T : S U N L I N E T R A N S I T A G E N C Y
T o t a l A p p o r t i o n m e n t ( P r o j e c t e d b a s e d o n p r i o r y e a r a c t u a l s )
A p p o r t i o n m e n t
L a p s i n g F u n d s ( p e r F T A )
C a r r y o v e r ( E s t i m a t e )
T r a n s f e r o f F u n d s ( C M A Q )
T o t a l F u n d s A v a i l a b l e
L e s s C u r r e n t R e q u e s t s
B a l a n c e ( P r o j e c t e d )
N U M B E R P R O G R A M O F P R O J E C T S
1 )
2 )
3 )
4 )
5 )
6 )
7 )
8 )
9 )
1 0 )
1 1 )
T O T A L :
O p e r a t i n g A s s i s t a n c e
P r e v e n t i v e M a i n t e n a n c e
B u s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n
7 R e p l a c e m e n t P a r a t r a n s i t B u s e s
T r a n s i t E n h a n c e m e n t
F a c i l i t y I m p r o v e m e n t
A d m i n i s t r a t i v e B u i l d i n g
O f f i c e F u r n i t u r e
I T S P r o j e c t
T r a n s i t P l a n n i n g & F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d i e s
M a i n t e n a n c e T o o l s & E q u i p m e n t
A p p r o v e d : 7 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 1 ( P e n d i n g )
T O T A L
A M O U N T
$ 2 0 , 2 1 0 , 1 5 3
1 , 9 6 7 , 2 0 1
1 6 0 , 0 0 0
6 6 5 , 0 0 0
6 5 , 6 7 8
5 5 0 , 0 0 0
1 0 , 7 7 0 , 8 6 8
1 2 0 , 0 0 0
5 0 0 , 0 0 0
4 5 0 , 0 0 0
1 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 3 5 , 5 5 8 , 9 0 0
$ 3 , 7 4 0 , 8 6 3
1 , 8 2 6 , 8 4 2
5 , 5 6 7 , 7 0 5
3 , 4 6 4 , 3 9 0
$ 2 , 1 0 3 , 3 1 5
F E D E R A L P R O J E C T D E S I G N A T E D
S H A R E T Y P E R E C I P I E N T
$ 9 2 4 , 8 0 4
1 , 2 5 0 , 0 0 0
1 2 8 , 0 0 0
1 0 0 , 0 0 0
3 5 , 5 8 6
1 0 0 , 0 0 0
4 0 0 , 0 0 0
9 6 , 0 0 0
2 0 0 , 0 0 0
1 5 0 , 0 0 0
8 0 , 0 0 0
$ 3 , 4 6 4 , 3 9 0
O p e r a t i n g
C a p i t a l
C a p i t a l
C a p i t a l
C a p i t a l
C a p i t a l
C a p i t a l
C a p i t a l
C a p i t a l
C a p i t a l
C a p i t a l
S L A G
S C A G
S C A G
S C A G
S C A G
S C A G
S C A G
S C A G
S C A G
S C A G
S C A G
V : W C l e m e n t e 1 5 3 0 7 1 P 0 P 1 1 n d i o - C o a c h e l l a - P S p r i n g s 1 1 - 1 2 . x l s
4 3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
FTA SECTION 5307
FY 2011/12
URBANIZED AREA: TEMECULAlMURRIETA
RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY
Total Apportionment (Projected based on prior year actuals)
Apportionment $ 3,187,804
Lapsing Funds (per FTA)
Carryover 3,165,793
Transfer of Funds (CMAQ)
Total Funds Available 6,353,597
Less Current Requests 6,000,000
Balance (Projected) $ 353,597
NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
ATTACHMENT
Page 4 of 4
TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED
AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT
1) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance $ 9,187,500 $ 3,000,000 Capital/Operating SCAG
2) Capital Cost of Contracting 5,312,500 3,000,000 Operating SCAG
TOTAL: $ 14,500,000 $ 6,000,000
Approved: 7/13/11 (pending)
V:IJClemente153071P0 P1Temecula-M urrieta 11-12.xls
44
ATTACHMENT
Page 2 of 2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDING
FY 2011/12 TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS
STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS
RECOMMENDED
ESTIMATED STA STA TRANSIT
ESTIMATED STA ESTIMATED STA CARRY OVER ALLOCATIONS FOR
AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA OPERATING COSTS CAPITAL COSTS FUNDS FY 2011/12
City of Banning
City of Beaumont
City of Corona
Riverside Special Services
Riverside Transit Agency
TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - BUS
$
$
50,000
752,000
80,750
7,597,029
8,479,779
$
3,383,621
3,383,621
50,000
752,000
80,750
4,213,408
5,096,158
RCTC's Commuter Rail (Metrolink)
TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE -
COMMUTER RAIL
SunLine Transit Agency
TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY
2,779,135
2,779,135
2,779,135
2,779,135
Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency
TOTAL: PALO VERDE VALLEY
109,850
109,850
109,850
109,850
COUNTY WIDE TOTAL
$ - $ 11,368,764 $ 3,383,621 $ 7,985,143
STA Operating
Funds
FY 2011/12
STA Capital
Funds
FY 2011/12
- $
-
50,000
-
752,000
-
80,750
-
4,213,408
-
5,096,158
-
2,779,135
-
2,779,135
-
109,850
- 109,850
$
- $ 7,985,143
FY 2011-12 LTF STA AllocationsALL.xlsx
6/15/2011
•
L-17
weA snolneud way spun/ iaeokueo dWnl/8L de/d/94C5/60CS/d11/V1S ul 4SeL9V9$ sapnpul;soo le;o; ZL/LIOZ Ad Z eloN
'(OOC'SL9'b1.$) enueAai /foga/el ilea pue (009'LZ0140 saloua6e leu0ed wo;l Aplsgns Buge;ado leuoplppe ul uo110w CZ£$ Ala/ewpzoudde snld uomu g•914 Ameuesoldde to welts s,01Da apnloul woo s,llea aainwwop.
%96'17E 4CL'Z96'991 $ 9S£`on 1.4Z $ le;ol
%06E 009'SL4'L£ $ 004'COL'Z£ $
i°e0paal %
It/at Ad
Z lit t AA
.spun] HEN mrwwo0 to o6eJanai
%LL 4
66V£69'S4
Z40 496'91
%9L'Zb
b£Z'LLV9Z4 $
99Z`SZl'614 $
°AU ZZ4
1799'£9L'PE $
OCE'L9eLL $
%9Z'ZL
OL9`CLL'06 $
9Z6`LE8'404 $
5V3L1V 11V :1V101
r g4
Y46,1
s%
i
"zm) "-�
%99'84
£80'9£
Z48 ZP
%64'4P
PLE�494 1
649 SZ9 4
%49'90l
SOO ZZE
L6V999�
L 94
69E` Z8
.a�
�ZZE'096
...,. .wa-,1
V101 :A311VA 30213A O1Vd
%S9'Sl
°�is�°w r
£90'9C
v
ZL9'Zb
%1344P
,.
PLC'l9L'L
,.
6499Z94
%L9'904
900'ZZ£
L6Z'999
%6L'9L
69E'6Z9
ZZ£'096
Aoua6y psue;l AapPA ap;an oled
`'
Lm
.�,
� 14�1"
1��itili�?%Lf'O
946Z604
£OZ904P
%Z8'OZ
'
S6LE£Z'0£
'
LZ88ZS9£
/80'49
94P'606'8
'
LyLSEbl
%00�
£�bSC
al Z
V.1.0.1. VA Vll3HDV0
%LE'a
%C t'Z
91.6'Z60'4
OOP 499' 44
£OZ'804'b
28£ 049'44
%Z8'OZ
VoZ9'64
96L'ECZ'OE
990 Z60'46
LZ9'8Z9'9E
048'0L6 004
%8019
%Kt EbL
9LP 6069
£PL'Z£S 9Z
ELP'LSE'bL
099 °Len
%00'b
6L£'bZE'LZ
b9£'LLVZZ
Aoua6ypSue.l aunung
%6L'Pl
ZZ6'699 99
OSZ 00e8L
11ea g 589
11f101 :A.LN1100 0483193M
%LE9
909'469'Z
046'940'E
%49'PL
ZL4'4L6'6Z
994'9PCZ9
%E I'C6
ZLZ'OL4'el
99Z'999'9C
%6L'94
006'E99'44
006'69L'9L
Ilea.; Aluno3 tualsem
%S0'L
96L'ZL9'8
L8P'89L'8
%ZZ'9C
CH L44'49
9994Z9'99
5$04'9LZ
4L8'4Z4'L
90E'PLL'9Z
%.29'8
ZZO'966'99
09E'046'49
sn9 :AaunoO walsaM
AouabvLisue;lapls/aAl l
%£8'0
80L'01.0'9
'L94
8469L0'8
°Ate'PP
446'9L949
046'6L9'8L
%BZ'LS4
490'Z99'4
L98'94L'PZ
%9Z'9
LLE'996'64
£80'40L'49
%4E'Z
;Lb
044'494
%6L'Z-
4LE'LPVI,
LLO'BZL'b
VoL9'9E-
000009'4
000'096
%LL'SL
LLE'LPL'Z
L1.0'6LL'E
saoln/as!mods apis/anla
%OSL
LL0'60Z
LOZ'ZLZ
%9Z'6Z
68Z'Z6Z'Z
444'E96'Z
%8Z'L94
Z99 Lb£
8b17'966
VaZ0'4
LCL'446'l
E99'496'l
euaoOlo 40
%46'9
CZ9'994
844L94
%LO'E
Z99'6017 L
000'Z94L
%Sb'L9-
Z99'69Z
000'0S
%86'ZZ
000'0171.'t
000'Z041.
Luowneeslo40
%aL
1090p3u1
999'6ZL
b£8'LEl
%89'8I-
OEV099'L $
L99'09Z'L $
%00'00L-
E69'ZSE $
- $
%9Z9
LES'L64'1. $
L9909Z'4 $
6uluue9 to 43
(a;ewpa3)
44/OIAd
(uol;oaloid)
ELM A3
»a0paul
%
LL/OLAd
ZL/LLAd
;oa0poul%
LL/OLA3
2L/L LAd
ne0poul
W
LL/OIAA
ZL/L4Ad
V3aV1N3WNOLUIOddV/AON3Vi
dIHS21301a
19001V101
1V11dV0
ONI1V83d0
P1N3WHOVJAV
•
suol;aaload dlysaapl2l pue s;so0 lellde0 buneaad0 44/040Z Ad'8 Z4/440Z Ad ;o uoslaedulo0
•
6/27/2011
Budget and Implementation Committee
FY 2011/12 Funding Allocation for
Riverside County Transit Services
Tune 27, 2011
Short Range Transit Plans
FY 2011/12 — FY 2013/14
RCTC
SRTPs Approved in concept: 6/9/11
City of Banning
City of Beaumont
City of Corona
City of Riverside
Riverside Transit Agency
SunLine Transit Agency
Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency
RCTC Rail Commuter Program
1
6/27/2011
Comparison: LTF, Transit Measure A and STA
RCTC
FY 2010/11 & 2011/12 Revenues -_-
LTF
Measure A
(Transit)
FY 2010/11 $49,101,135 $10,138,083
FY 2011/12 $52,784,515 $10,940,000 $23,398,642
Change +$ 3,683,380 +$ 801,017 + $23,398,642*
*Includes: $12,801,951 = Gas Tax Swap Funds (to cover FY 10 & FY 11 lost funds)
$10,596,691 = STA estimate for FY 11/12
piRIVERSIDE COUNTY FY 2011/12
TRANSIT FUNDING REQUEST
RCTC
FY 2011/12 Funding Request
by 8 County Transit Operators
Commuter Rail Program share
from Metrolink Partners
FY 2011/12 TOTAL FUNDING SUPPORT
FOR RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSIT SERVICES
$179.1 million
+ 32.7 million
$211.8 million
2
6/27/2011
bole • r mp•I•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY: FY 2011/12 OPERATING and CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
TDA (LTF & SIA Funds), —
573,038,658 , 34%
Carry Over Funds
15TA/5309/TUMF/Prop
1B/LTF/Sec 5316),
$6,567,754, 3%
Addll Rall Operating
Subsidy paid by SANBAG,
OCTA & LA Metro,
$18,027,800, 8%
Other Revenues,
5%562,274, 2%
Passenger Fares, J Sec 5316SS 5317,
$34,502,771, 16%
51,194,717, I%
Measure A, $11,757,370,
6%
Federal Formula Funds
(Sec S307 & S311),
$24,384,042 ,12%
Federal -Discretionary
Funds (Sec 6309),
$25,208,000, 12%
Prop 1B (Cap.Securlty),
513,584,970 , 6%
,
10 `;. - Operating and Capital
i Expenditures : FY 08/09 — 11/12 ."RCTc
te....t..
Operating
Capital
Total Cost .,c.,
180
1: 71 9
N_
150
144 z, s%
r
-
_
120
a.sx :]s%
*
a
125
S.102
•xs
s.:i
•
g
E
Q
60
77
30
•
. a
35
•
e A 4. 0 e t+ P P P P 4+
3
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
J u n e 2 7 , 2 0 1 1
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
F i n a C l e m e n t e , T r a n s i t M a n a g e r
T H R O U G H :
R o b e r t Y a t e s , M u l t i m o d a l S e r v i c e s D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 P r o d u c t i v i t y I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
1 ) R e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s ' c o m p l i a n c e s t a t u s r e p o r t f o r t h e
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 P r o d u c t i v i t y I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( P I P ) ; a n d
2 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
T h e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e v e l o p m e n t A c t r e q u i r e s t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n n u a l l y
i d e n t i f y a n d a n a l y z e o p e r a t i n g t r e n d s f o r e a c h o p e r a t o r a n d r e c o m m e n d p o t e n t i a l
p r o d u c t i v i t y i m p r o v e m e n t s , w h i c h c o u l d l o w e r t h e o p e r a t i n g c o s t s a s p e r t h e P u b l i c
U t i l i t i e s C o d e ( P U C ) S e c t i o n 9 9 2 4 4 . T h e C o m m i s s i o n m e e t s t h i s r e q u i r e m e n t
t h r o u g h t h e a d o p t i o n a n d a p p r o v a l o f t h e S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n s ( S R T P ) , w h i c h
d e t a i l t h e o p e r a t i n g a n d c a p i t a l c o s t s f o r p l a n n e d t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s f o r b o t h b u s a n d
c o m m u t e r r a i l .
T h e P I P w a s d e s i g n e d t o a s s i s t i n t h e S R T P p r o c e s s a n d m e e t s t a t e P U C
r e q u i r e m e n t s b y e s t a b l i s h i n g o b j e c t i v e c r i t e r i a f o r a s s e s s i n g p r o d u c t i v i t y
i m p r o v e m e n t o p p o r t u n i t i e s . T h e p r o g r a m i s p a r t o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s
c o m p r e h e n s i v e e f f o r t t o w o r k w i t h t h e c o u n t y ' s e i g h t p u b l i c t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s t o
i m p r o v e s y s t e m e f f i c i e n c y , p r o v i d e b e t t e r s e r v i c e a n d m a n a g e c o s t s . T o
a c c o m p l i s h t h i s , t h e P I P e s t a b l i s h e s b o t h m a n d a t o r y a n d d i s c r e t i o n a r y p e r f o r m a n c e
t a r g e t s t h a t a r e e v a l u a t e d a g a i n s t t h e o p e r a t o r ' s a c t u a l p e r f o r m a n c e . T h e P I P
r e q u i r e s a l l o p e r a t o r s t o m e e t a s i n g l e m a n d a t o r y t a r g e t a n d s e v e n d i s c r e t i o n a r y
t a r g e t s . T h e p e r f o r m a n c e t a r g e t s a r e e v a l u a t e d t h r o u g h t h e P I P p r o c e s s a s f o l l o w s :
M a n d a t o r y T a r g e t
" F a r e b o x r e c o v e r y r a t i o ( b e t w e e n 1 0 p e r c e n t f o r s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d i n n o n -
u r b a n i z e d a r e a s a n d 2 0 p e r c e n t f o r s e r v i c e s i n u r b a n i z e d a r e a s ) .
A g e n d a I t e m 1 1
4 8
Discretionary Targets
• Operating cost per revenue hour (CPI annual increase);
• Subsidy per passenger (+/- 15% variance);
• Subsidy per passenger mile (+/- 15% variance);
• Subsidy per revenue hour (+/- 15% variance);
• Subsidy per revenue mile (+/- 15% variance);
• Passengers per revenue hour (+/- 15% variance); and
• Passengers per revenue mile (+/- 15% variance).
Additional Discretionary Targets for Commuter Rail Program
• Ridership growth - goal of 2%; and
• Passenger miles per revenue car - goal of 30 passengers per revenue car
mile.
To be in compliance with the PIP, a bus operator needs to meet or exceed the
required fare box recovery ratio and meet or exceed four of seven discretionary
targets. The Commuter Rail Program must meet or exceed the required fare box
recovery ratio as well as five out of nine discretionary standards.
Based on the FY 2009/10 data the attached PIP Compliance Summary report
indicates that all transit operators have either met or exceeded the PIP targets. The
cities of Banning, Corona, Riverside, Riverside Transit Agency and SunLine Transit
Agency have met the required fare box recovery target and all seven discretionary
targets. The city of Beaumont met the mandatory fare box target as well as six
out of seven discretionary targets, while the Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency met
four of seven discretionary targets in addition to the mandatory fare box target.
The Commission's Commuter Rail Program has met its fare box requirement and
five out of nine discretionary targets.
To ensure that transit services in the county are provided effectively and
efficiently, staff in cooperation with transit providers will continue to monitor
quarterly performance to track progress against each agency's own goals,
performance measures and service standards. Staff also intends to implement a
comprehensive review of the PIP to ensure that policy, criteria, and targets are both
fair and achievable by the operators in light of the current economic conditions.
Attachments:
1) FY 2009/10 PIP Compliance Summary — Fourth Quarter Status
2) Service Provider Performance Target Reports
Agenda Item 11
49
"
"
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 P I P C O M P L I A N C E S U M M A R Y - F O U R T H Q U A R T E R S T A T U S
J u l y 2 0 0 9 - J u n e 2 0 1 0
"
A T T A C H M E N T 1
P I P i n d i c a t o r s
B a n n i n g
B e a u m o n t
C o r o n a
R i v e r s i d e
R C T C R a i l
R T A
S u n L i n e
P V V T A
M a n d a t o r y :
1 . F a r e b o x R e c o v e r y R a t i o
J
J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
D i s c r e t i o n a r y :
1 . O p e r a t i n g C o s t P e r R e v e n u e H o u r
J
m
J
J
O
J
J
0
2 . S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r
J
J
J
- 4
O
J
J
0
3 . S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r M i l e
J
J
J
J
J
J
d
J
4 . S u b s i d y P e r H o u r
J
J
J
J
0
J
J
J
5 . S u b s i d y P e r M i l e
J
d
J
J
Q
J
J
J
6 . P a s s e n g e r s P e r R e v e n u e H o u r
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
O
7 . P a s s e n g e r s P e r R e v e n u e M i l e
J
J _
J
J
J
J
J
J
U n l i n k e d P a s s e n g e r T r i p s ( R a i l )
��r
1 ����
; r
e _
r
J
, . r t a
P a s s e n g e r M i l e s p e r R e v . C a r M i l e s ( R a i l )
i ��, k s
}
� z
4 ' z r " ; # J
'
��.
T
a
P
4 s T i
M a n d a t o r y S c o r e c a r d ( F a r e b o x R a t i o ,
D i s c r e t i o n a r y S c o r e c a r d
M e t F a r e b o x
m e t 7 o f 7
M e t F a r e b o x
m e t 6 o f 7
M e t F a r e b o x
m e t 7 o f 7
M e t F a r e b o x
m e t 7 o f 7
M e t F a r e b o x
m e t 5 o f 9
M e t F a r e b o x
m e t 7 o f 7
M e t F a r e b o x
m e t 7 o f 7
M e t F a r e b o x
m e t 4 o f 7
P I P C o m p l i a n c e *
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
* L e g e n d : J = I n C o m p l i a n c e ; 0 = N o t i n C o m p l i a n c e ; N / A = n o t a v a i l a b l e
T o m e e t R C T C P I P P r o g r a m , o p e r a t o r s n e e d t o m e e t :
" R e q u i r e d F a r e b o x r e c o v e r y r a t i o : ( 1 0 % f o r m u n i c i p a l o p e r a t o r s ; 2 0 % f o r C o r o n a , 4 0 % f o r R a i l , 1 6 . 8 5 % f o r R T A a n d 1 8 . 1 8 % f o r S u n L i n e )
" A t l e a s t 4 o f t h e 7 d i s c r e t i o n a r y t a r g e t s ( B u s ) ; a t l e a s t 5 o f t h e 9 d i s c r e t i o n a r y t a r g e t s ( R a i l )
F o u r t h Q u a r t e r F Y 0 9 / 1 0 P I P C o m p l i a n c e ( a s o f J u n e / 1 0 ) :
" A l l O p e r a t o r s m e t F a r e b o x r a t i o r e q u i r e m e n t .
" A l l O p e r a t o r s a r e i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h D i s c r e t i o n a r y I n d i c a t o r r e q u i r e m e n t t o m e e t a t l e a s t 4 o f 7 d i s c r e t i o n a r y t a r g e t s
l C / o - r - i i
5 0
Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report
FY 2009/10 Short Range Transit Plan Review
City of Banning
Data Elements
FY 2009/10 Plan
FY 2009/10 Target
FY 2009/10
Year to Date
Through 4th Quarter
Year to Date
Performance
Scorecard
Unlinked Passenger Trips
151,457
Passenger Miles
369,270
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours
15,393.0
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles
241,393.0
Total Actual Vehicle Miles
259,564.0
Total Operating Expenses
$1,274,851
Total Passenger Fare Revenue
$129,850
Net Operating Expenses
$1,145,001
Performance Indicators
Mandatory:
1. Farebox Recovery. Ratio
I 10.18% ( >= 10.00% ( 10.93% IMeets Target
Discretionary:
1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour
$82.82
<= $84.89
$84.33
Meets Target
2. Subsidy Per Passenger
$7.56
>= $6.44 and <= $8.72
$8.49
Meets Target
3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile
$3.10
>= $2.48 and <= $3.36
$3.18
Meets Target
4. Subsidy Per Hour
$74.38
>= $61.84 and <= $83.66
$75.11
Meets Target
5. Subsidy Per Mile
$4.74
>= $3.77 and <= $5.11
$4.65
Meets Target
6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour
9.80
>= 8.16 and <= 11.04
8.80
Meets Target
7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile
0.63
>= 0.50 and <= 0.68
0.55
Meets Target
Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators
Productivity Performance Summary:
Meets FY 09/10 Farebox Ratio Requirement.
Meets 7 of 7 Discretionary Indicators. Meets RCTC PIP Program.
Service Provider Comments:
Trans ck Manager'"'
6/9/2D4
Patiof 8
"
T a t 7 - - S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r P e r f o r m a n c e T a r g e t s R e p o r t
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n R e v i e w
C i t y o f B e a u m o n t
D a t a E l e m e n t s
U n l i n k e d P a s s e n g e r T r i p s
P a s s e n g e r M i l e s
T o t a l A c t u a l V e h i c l e R e v e n u e H o u r s
T o t a l A c t u a l V e h i c l e R e v e n u e M i l e s
T o t a l A c t u a l V e h i c l e M i l e s
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 P l a n
T o t a l O p e r a t i n g E x p e n s e s
T o t a l P a s s e n g e r F a r e R e v e n u e
1 1 4 , 1 0 0
2 2 6 , 4 0 0
1 6 , 2 0 0 . 0
2 3 5 , 5 8 0 . 0
2 4 4 , 1 8 0 . 0
$ 1 , 1 9 8 , 5 0 0
N e t O p e r a t i n g E x p e n s e s
$ 1 1 9 , 8 5 0
$ 1 , 0 7 8 , 6 5 0
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 T a r g e t
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0
Y e a r t o D a t e
T h r o u g h 4 t h Q u a r t e r
Y e a r t o D a t e
P e r f o r m a n c e
S c o r e c a r d
P e r f o r m a n c e I n d i c a t o r s
M a n d a t o r y :
1 . F a r e b o x R e c o v e r y R a t i o
D i s c r e t i o n a r y :
1 . O p e r a t i n g C o s t P e r R e v e n u e H o u r
2 . S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r
3 . S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r M i l e
4 . S u b s i d y P e r H o u r
5 . S u b s i d y P e r M i l e
6 . P a s s e n g e r s P e r R e v e n u e H o u r
7 . P a s s e n g e r s P e r R e v e n u e M i l e
1 0 . 0 0 %
$ 7 3 . 9 8
$ 9 . 4 5
$ 4 . 7 6
$ 6 6 . 5 8
$ 4 . 5 8
> = 1 0 . 0 0 % '
< = $ 7 4 . 2 5
> = $ 9 . 0 9 a n d < = $ 1 2 . 2 9
> = $ 4 . 1 9 a n d < = $ 5 . 6 7
> = $ 5 5 . 1 1 a n d < = $ 7 4 . 5 5
> = $ 3 . 9 9 a n d < = $ 5 . 3 9
1 9 . 2 6 % ' M e e t s T a r g e t
$ 7 9 . 3 5
$ 7 . 6 2
$ 3 . 6 7
$ 6 4 . 0 7
N o t e : M u s t m e e t a t l e a s t 4 o u t o f 7 D i s c r e t i o n a r y P e r f o r m a n c e I n d i c a t o r s
7 . 0 0
0 . 4 8
> = 5 . 1 9 a n d < = 7 . 0 2
> = 0 . 3 7 a n d < = 0 . 5 1
$ 4 . 5 8
8 . 4 0
0 . 6 0
F a i l s t o M e e t T a r g e t
B e t t e r T h a n T a r g e t
B e t t e r T h a n T a r g e t
M e e t s T a r g e t
M e e t s T a r g e t
B e t t e r T h a n T a r g e t
B e t t e r T h a n T a r g e t
P r o d u c t i v i t y P e r f o r m a n c e S u m m a r y :
M e e t s F Y 0 9 / 1 0 F a r e b o x R a t i o R e q u i r e m e n t .
M e e t s 6 o f 7 D i s c r e t i o n a r y I n d i c a t o r s . M e e t s R O T C P I P P r o g r a m .
S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r C o m m e n t s :
T r a n s T r a c k M a n a g e r ' "
6 / 9 / 2 0 1 1
P a g e 2 o f
5 2
Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report
FY 2009/10 Short Range Transit Plan Review
City of Corona
Data Elements
FY 2009/10 Plan
FY 2009/10 Target
FY 2009/10
Year to Date
Through 4th Quarter
Year to Date
Performance
Scorecard
Unlinked Passenger Trips
231,382
Passenger Miles
979,656
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours
34,205.0
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles
437,556.0
Total Actual Vehicle Miles
465,896.0
Total Operating Expenses
$2,106,454
Total Passenger Fare Revenue
$421,291
Net Operating, Expenses
$1,685,163
Performance Indicators
Mandatory:
1. Farebox Recovery Ratio 1 20,00% I >= 20.00% 1 20.82%'Meets Target
Discretionary:
1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour
$61.58
<_ $59.39
$59.09
Meets Target
2. Subsidy Per Passenger
$7.28
>_ $5.81 and <_ $7.85
$7.00
Meets Target
3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile
$1.72
>_ $1.37 and <_ $1.85
$1.65
Meets Target
4. Subsidy Per Hour
$49.27
>_ $39.02 and <_ $52,79
$46.79
Meets Target
5. Subsidy Per Mile
$3.85
> _ $3.05 and <_ $4.13
$3.63
Meets Target
6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour
6.80
> = 5.70 and <= 7.71
6.70
Meets Target
7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile
_ 0.53
>= 0.45 and <= 0.61
0.52
Meets Target
Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators
Productivity Performance Summary:
Meets FY 09/10 Parebox Ratio Requirement.
Meets 7 of 7 Discretionary Indicators. Meets RCTC PIP Program.
Service Provider Comments:
TransTrack Manager""
619120
Page 3 of 8
"
T a b l e "
7 - - S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r P e r f o r m a n c e T a r e t s R e p o r t
9 p
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n R e v i e w
C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e
D a t a E l e m e n t s
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 P l a n
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 T a r g e t
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0
Y e a r t o D a t e
T h r o u g h 4 t h Q u a r t e r
Y e a r t o D a t e
P e r f o r m a n c e
S c o r e c a r d
U n l i n k e d P a s s e n g e r T r i p s
1 6 4 , 5 6 2
P a s s e n g e r M i l e s
5 9 0 , 9 8 1
T o t a l A c t u a l V e h i c l e R e v e n u e H o u r s
3 9 , 9 7 7 . 0
T o t a l A c t u a l V e h i c l e R e v e n u e M i l e s
5 9 0 , 9 8 1 . 0
T o t a l A c t u a l V e h i c l e M i l e s
7 2 2 , 8 8 9 . 0
T o t a l O p e r a t i n g E x p e n s e s
$ 2 , 9 7 8 , 4 9 6
T o t a l P a s s e n g e r F a r e R e v e n u e
$ 3 3 1 , 0 0 0
N e t O p e r a t i n g E x p e n s e s
$ 2 , 6 4 7 , 4 9 6 _
P e r f o r m a n c e I n d i c a t o r s
M a n d a t o r y :
1 . F a r e b o x R e c o v e r y R a t i o 1 1 . 1 1 % I > = 1 0 . 0 0 % I 1 3 . 4 7 % I M e e t s T a r g e t
D i s c r e t i o n a r y :
1 . O p e r a t i n g C o s t P e r R e v e n u e H o u r
$ 7 4 . 5 1
< = $ 7 4 . 4 8
$ 7 0 . 8 6
M e e t s T a r g e t
2 . S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r
$ 1 6 . 0 9
> = $ 1 3 . 8 0 a n d < = $ 1 8 . 6 6
$ 1 6 . 8 9
M e e t s T a r g e t
3 . S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r M i l e
$ 4 . 4 8
> = $ 3 . 5 6 a n d < = $ 4 . 8 2
$ 4 . 3 3
M e e t s T a r g e t
4 . S u b s i d y P e r H o u r
$ 6 6 . 2 3
> = $ 5 4 . 0 8 a n d < = $ 7 3 . 1 6
$ 6 1 . 3 1
M e e t s T a r g e t
5 . S u b s i d y P e r M i l e
$ 4 . 4 8
> = $ 3 . 8 4 a n d < = $ 5 . 2 0
$ 4 . 2 1
M e e t s T a r g e t
6 . P a s s e n g e r s P e r R e v e n u e H o u r
4 . 1 0
> = 3 . 3 2 a n d < = 4 . 4 9
3 . 6 0
M e e t s T a r g e t
7 . P a s s e n g e r s P e r R e v e n u e M i l e
0 . 2 8
> = 0 . 2 4 a n d < = 0 . 3 2
0 . 2 5
M e e t s T a r g e t
N o t e : M u s t m e e t a t ! P A O 4 n i e o f 7 r l i e r r a t i n n a n r D e r f n e r n w n T . . . U , , � . . . . .
P r o d u c t i v i t y P e r f o r m a n c e S u m m a r y :
M e e t s F Y 0 9 / 1 0 F a r e b o x R a t i o R e q u i r e m e n t .
M e e t s 7 o f 7 D i s c r e t i o n a r y I n d i c a t o r s . M e e t s R O T C P I P P r o g r a m .
S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r C o m m e n t s :
T r a n s T r a c k M a n a g e r '
6 / 9 / 2 0 1 1
P a g e 4 o f
5 4
Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report
FY 2009/10 Short Range Transit Plan Review
Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency
Data Elements
FY 2009/10 Plan
FY 2009/10 Target
FY 2009/10
Year to Date
Through 4th Quarter
Year to Date
Performance
Scorecard
Unlinked Passenger Trips
58,085
Passenger Miles
369,137
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours
12,475.0
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles
216,020.0
Total Actual Vehicle Miles
254,643.0
Total Operating Expenses
$925,069
Total Passenger Fare Revenue
$107,775
Net Operating Expenses
$817,294
Performance Indicators
Mandatory:
1, Farebox Recovery Ratio I 11.65% 1 >= 10.00% I 12.43% Meets Target
Discretionary:
1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour
$74.15
<= $83.88
$89.88
Fails to Meet Target
2. Subsidy Per Passenger
$14.07
>= $12.72 and <= $17.22
$19.76
Fails to Meet Target
3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile
$2.21
>= $2.06 and <= $2.78
$1.83
Better Than Target
4. Subsidy Per Hour
$65.51
>= $61.99 and <= $83.87
$78.70
Meets Target
5. Subsidy Per Mile
$3.78
>= $3.68 and <= $4.98
$4.46
Meets Target
6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour
4.70
>= 4.08 and <= 5.52
4.00
Fails to Meet Target
7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile
0.27
>= 0.23 and <= 0.32
0.23
Meets Target
Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators
Productivity Performance Summary:
Meets FY 09/10 Farebox Ratio Requirement.
Meets 4 of 7 Discretionary Indicators. Did not meet RCM PIP Program.
Service Provider Comments:
TransTrack Manager""
6/9/200
Pa. of8
" "
T a b l e 7 - - S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r P e r f o r m a n c e T a r g e t s R e p o r t
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n R e v i e w
R C T C C o m m u t e r R a i l
D a t a E l e m e n t s
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 P l a n
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0 T a r g e t
F Y 2 0 0 9 / 1 0
Y e a r t o D a t e
T h r o u g h 4 t h Q u a r t e r
Y e a r t o D a t e
P e r f o r m a n c e
S c o r e c a r d
U n l i n k e d P a s s e n g e r T r i p s
3 , 2 7 9 , 9 6 6
P a s s e n g e r M i l e s
1 1 4 , 9 3 7 , 1 8 4
T o t a l A c t u a l V e h i c l e R e v e n u e T r a i n H o u r s
7 3 , 2 8 5 . 0
T o t a l A c t u a l V e h i c l e R e v e n u e C a r M i l e s
2 , 9 6 5 , 3 9 1 . 0
T o t a l A c t u a l V e h i c l e T r a i n M i l e s
T o t a l O p e r a t i n g E x p e n s e s
$ 4 2 , 5 3 3 , 0 0 0
T o t a l P a s s e n g e r F a r e R e v e n u e
$ 2 0 , 0 1 0 , 1 0 0
N e t O p e r a t i n g E x p e n s e s
$ 2 2 , 5 2 2 , 9 0 0
P e r f o r m a n c e I n d i c a t o r s
M a n d a t o r y :
1 . F a r e b o x R e c o v e r y R a t i o I 4 7 . 0 4 0 / 0 I > = 4 0 . 0 0 % I 4 0 . 7 2 0 / 0 ' M e e t s T a r g e t
D i s c r e t i o n a r y :
1 . O p e r a t i n g C o s t P e r R e v e n u e H o u r
$ 5 8 0 . 3 8
< = $ 2 , 8 7 6 . 4 0
$ 2 , 9 0 6 . 3 4
F a i l s t o M e e t T a r g e t
2 . S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r
$ 6 . 8 7
> = $ 6 . 1 1 a n d < = $ 8 . 2 7
$ 8 . 5 0
F a i l s t o M e e t T a r g e t
3 . S u b s i d y P e r P a s s e n g e r M i l e
$ 0 . 2 0
> = $ 0 . 1 8 a n d < = $ 0 . 2 4
$ 0 . 2 4
M e e t s T a r g e t
4 . S u b s i d y P e r H o u r
$ 3 0 7 . 3 3
" , = $ 1 , 6 1 2 . 8 8 a n d < = $ 1 , 7 0 8 . 1 8
$ 1 , 7 2 2 . 7 0
F a i l s t o M e e t T a r g e t
5 . S u b s i d y P e r M i l e
$ 7 . 6 0
> = $ 6 . 4 2 a n d < = $ 8 . 6 8
$ 9 . 1 2
F a i l s t o M e e t T a r g e t
6 . P a s s e n g e r s P e r R e v e n u e H o u r
4 4 . 8 0
> = 1 9 1 . 9 1 a n d < = 2 0 5 . 2 9
2 0 2 . 6 0
M e e t s T a r g e t
7 . P a s s e n g e r s P e r R e v e n u e M i l e
1 . 1 1
> = 0 . 8 9 a n d < = 1 . 2 1
1 . 0 7
M e e t s T a r g e t
8 . U n l i n k e d P a s s e n g e r T r i p s
3 , 2 7 9 , 9 6 6
> = 3 , 2 0 6 , 1 3 9
2 , 9 3 9 , 5 8 7
M e e t s T a r g e t
9 . P a s s e n g e r M i l e s p e r R e v . C a r M i l e s
3 8 . 7 6
> = 3 0 . 5 2 a n d < = 4 1 . 3 0
3 7 . 8 1
M e e t s T a r g e t
N o t e : M u s t m e e t a t l e a s t 5 o u t f 9 D i s r r e t i n n a r y P A r f n r m a n r o r n r i i r a f n . c
P r o d u c t i v i t y P e r f o r m a n c e S u m m a r y :
M e e t s F Y 0 9 / 1 0 F a r e b o x R a t i o R e q u i r e m e n t .
M e e t s 5 o f 9 D i s c r e t i o n a r y I n d i c a t o r s . M e e t s R C T C P I P P r o g r a m .
S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r C o m m e n t s :
T r a n s T r a c k M a n a g e r "
6 / 9 / 2 0 1 1
P a g e 6 o f 8
5 6
Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report
FY 2009/10 Short Range Transit Plan Review
Riverside Transit Agency
Data Elements
FY 2009/10 Plan
FY 2009/10 Target
FY 2009/10
Year to Date
Through 4th Quarter
Year to Date
Performance
Scorecard
Unlinked Passenger Trips
7,818,232
52,895,475
Passenger Miles
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours
678,357,0
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles
11,942,606.0
Total Actual Vehicle Miles
13,848,422.0
Total Operating Expenses
$52,998,175
Total Passenger Fare Revenue
$10,820,349
Net Operating Expenses
$42,177,826
Performance Indicators
Mandatory:
1. Farebox Recovery Ratio I 20.410/0 I_ >= 16.850/o 1 24.760/0 (Meets Target
Discretionary:
1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour
$78.13
<= $79.95
$75.81
Meets Target
2. Subsidy Per Passenger
$5.39
>= $4.20 and <= $5.68
$4.49
Meets Target
3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile
$0.80
>= $0.64 and <= $0.86
$0.68
Meets Target
4. Subsidy Per Hour
$62.18
>= $51,20 and <= $69.26
$57.04
Meets Target
5. Subsidy Per Mile
$3.53
>= $3.07 and <= $4.15
$3.35
Meets Target
6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour
11.50
>= 10.37 and <= 14.03
12.70
Meets Target
7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile
0.65
>= 0.62 and <= 0.84
0.75
Meets Target
Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators
Productivity Performance Summary:
Meets FY 09/10 Farebox Ratio Requirement.
Meets 7 of 7 Discretionary Indicators. Meets RCTC PIP Program.
Service Provider Comments:
Trans•ck Manager'
6/9/2
P4,7of8
Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report
FY 2009/10 Short Range Transit Plan Review
SunLine Transit Agency
Data Elements
FY 2009/10 Plan
FY 2009/10 Target
FY 2009/10
Year to Date
Through 4th Quarter
Year to Date
Performance
Scorecard
Unlinked Passenger Trips
3,853,176
Passenger Miles
22,271,866
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours
243,159.0
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles
3,097,836.0
Total Actual Vehide Miles
3,381,145.0
Total Operating Expenses
$22,735,270
Total Passenger Fare Revenue
$4,145,078
Net Operating Expenses
$18,590,192
Performance Indicators
Mandatory:
1. Farebox Recovery Ratio 18.230/0 I >= 18.180/0 1 18.180/0 1 Meets Target
Discretionary:
1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour
$93,50
<= $94.25
$91.72
Meets Target
2, Subsidy Per Passenger
$4.82
>= $3.90 and <= $5.28
$4.68
Meets Target
3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile
$0.83
>= $0.68 and <= $0.92
$0.81
Meets Target
4. Subsidy Per Hour
$76.45
>= $63.04 and <= $85.28
$75.04
Meets Target
5. Subsidy Per Mile
$6.00
>= $4.94 and <= $6.68
$5.54
Meets Target
6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour
15.80
>= 13.69 and <= 18.52
16.00
Meets Target
7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile
1.24
>= 1.07 and <= 1.45
1,18
Meets Target
NnYa• MiicY meet �r Icxr a nt �f � n«.er.,.,,.., e.s,...,.. �...... ._a:__._�
Productivity Performance Summary:
Meets FY 09/10 Farebox Ratio Requirement.
Meets 7 of 7 Discretionary Indicators. Meets RCTC PIP Program.
Service Provider Comments:
TransTrack Manager".
6/9/2011
Page 8 of 8
58
6/27/2011
toDB
Budget and Implementation Committee
Fiscal Year 2009/10 Productivity
Improvement Program
June 27, 2011
Mandatory Target
Farebox Recovery Ratio —10% for Non -Urbanized Areas
20% for Urbanized Areas
Discretionary Targets
1. Operating Cost per Revenue Hour (CPI annual increase)
2. Subsidy per Passenger (+/- 15% variance)
3. Subsidy per Passenger Mile (+/- 15% variance)
4. Subsidy per Revenue Hour (+/- 15%variance)
5. Subsidy per Revenue Mile (+/-15% variance)
6. Passengers per Revenue Hour (+/- 15% variance)
7. Passengers per Revenue Mile (+/- 15% variance)
Ade Discretionary Targets for Commuter Rail Program
Ridership growth goal of 2%and
Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Miles goal of 30
1
6/27/2011
➢To meet RCTC PIP Program, Operators
need to meet:
Required Farebox Recovery Ratio(10%-20% Bus)
(40% Rail)
and
At least 4 of the 7 Discretionary Targets (Bus)
At least 5 of the 9 Discretionary Targets (Rail)
MIL
111•06(•••••••••11•4•Yelo
0;21110111111
�„ _ M -
➢FY 09/10 PIP Compliance Summary Report
Mandatory:
Farebox Recovery Target: All Operators met FR
Discretionary Targets:
1. Met all 7 - Cities of Banning, Corona, Riverside
RTA and SunLine
2. Met 6 out of 7 - City of Beaumont
3. Met 4 out of 7 — Palo Verde Valley
4. Met 5 out of 9 — Commission's Rail Program
AIL
Y..Lhalo imp la llarotl.
2
RIVERS/DE
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
June 27, 2011
TO:
Budget and Implementation Committee
FROM:
Jillian Edmiston, Staff Analyst
Brian Cunanan, Commuter Assistance Manager
THROUGH:
Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director
SUBJECT:
SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Extension for the
City of Temecula
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Grant the city of Temecula (Temecula) an extension to June 30, 2012, for
SB 821 program funds approved for the Santa Gertrudis Creek
Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Overcrossing project; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Each year, 2% of the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) revenue is made available for
use on bicycle and pedestrian facility projects through the Commission's SB 821
program. This is a discretionary program administered by the Commission.
There are three steps to carry out the program:
1. All cities and the county are notified of the SB 821 program estimate of
available funding and are requested to submit project proposals. The
Commission's SB 821 program policies, project application, and selection
criteria are also provided with the notification.
2. SB 821 evaluation committee, comprised of members of the Commission's
Technical and Citizens Advisory Committees (three each), meets to review
and rank the project applications using the evaluation criteria adopted by the
Commission and recommends projects and funding amounts to the
Commission for approval.
3. The Commission reviews the Committee's recommendations and approves a
program of bicycle and pedestrian projects for funding.
The agencies then have 24 months to complete the projects. Any projects not
completed using local sources or awarded a construction contract within the
Agenda Item 12
59
24-months are deleted from the program and the funds are reprogrammed in the
next fiscal year. There are to be no time extensions granted unless the project is
part of -a larger, federally funded project or a project requiring coordination with
another public agency that has been delayed beyond the city/county's control.
DISCUSSION:
At its July 2007 meeting, the Commission awarded $1,591,765 to fund
16 projects as part of its SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program. The
agencies had until June 30, 2009, to complete the projects within this funding
cycle.
Temecula was allocated $132,000 for construction of the Santa Gertrudis Creek
Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Overcrossing project. In May 2009, Temecula requested
a 12-month extension, which was approved by the Commission in June 2009. In
May 2010, Temecula asked for a second extension, which was approved by the
Commission in June 2010. Per Temecula's extension request letter, the project
was also awarded federal funds as part of the Safe Routes to School program and
therefore had to comply with National Environmental Policy Act. Environmental
Clearance was obtained in May 2010. Temecula then submitted its request for
approval to proceed with construction to Ca!trans Local Assistance. Due to
additional federal requirements, Temecula is requesting a third and final 12-month
extension. The 12-month extension gives Temecula until June 30, 2012, to
complete the project and claim the allocated SB 821 funds.
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget:
Yes
Year:
FY 2011/12
Amount:
$132,000
Source of Funds:
LTF
Budget Ad ustment:
No
GLA No.:
601 62 86106
Fiscal Procedures Approved:
\144,4,„v.,
Date:
06/13/11
Attachment:
1) Letter from City of Temecula
2) City of Temecula Project Timeline
3) SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Commission Adopted
Policies
Agenda Item 12
•
60
ATTACHMENT 1
•
{'a
n
jDepartment of Public Works
41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 ■ Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Phone 1951) 694-6411 ■ Fax 19511694-6475 e www.cityoRemecula.org
June 7, 2011
City of Temecula
Ms. Jillian Edmiston, Staff Analyst
Riverside County Transportation Commission
P.O. Box 12008
Riverside, CA 92502-2208
Re: Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Overcrossing -- Request for
Extension FY2007/2008 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Program
Dear Ms. Edmiston;
The City of Temecula requests an extension of time beyond the June 30, 2011 deadline to claim
approved SB821 program funds for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge
Overcrossing project.
In addition to the SB821 program funds, the City of Temecula was successful in obtaining
additional grant funding through the Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program. Due to the economic
downturn the State SR2S program funds were replaced with federal Highway Safety
Improvement Program (HSIP) funding. As a result, the City was tasked with administering the
federal environmental processes to acquire NEPA clearance. The City of Temecula has diligently
pursued environmental approval, and in May 2010, obtained environmental clearance from
Caltrans.
Immediately following environmental approval, we submitted our Request for Authorization
(RFA) to Proceed with Construction to Caltrans, Local Assistance. Many requests from Caltrans
followed, including the submittal of additional documents, revisions and permitting requirements
not previously outlined as a requirement of the RFA review and approval process. The on -going
delay in processes has resulted in reaching the critical deadline associated with our SB821
program funds. (Summary of Milestone Tasks — attached for your reference)
Along with the SB821 deadline, we were notified by Caltrans that our project was dropped from
the FI'IP - Grouped Projects for HSIP programmed funds. Upon receipt of this information, we
immediately pursued actions to remedy the issue. We have since coordinated with RCTC and
SCAG to ensure our project is included in the Administrative Amendment No. 9 to amend the
FTIP, so that the obligation of federal funding can occur. Once the amendment is approved,
Caltrans Headquarters can approve our RFA package and the City of Temecula can advertise, bid
and award the project for the construction phase of work.
Pr Iowa on Recycled Paper
R:1C1P\PROJECTSIPWON'WOS-11 SG Creek Ped Bridge\Letters\RCTC-S13821-ExtensionRgstJune 201 L}cd.doc
61
Many events have impeded our progress in implementing this project, but the City is committed
to fulfilling our obligation and we support the goals and objectives of the SB821 Bicycle and
Pedestrian Program and the Safe Routes to School program. This project is significant and
extremely beneficial to the community and it provides a vital link between schools and residential
neighborhoods and promotes separation of trail commuters and motorists, thereby enhancing
safety.
This project is fully funded and will be ready for contract bid and award immediately following
reinstatement in the FTIP. We respectfully request an extension beyond the June 30, 2011
timeframe to continue our efforts to project implementation and completion. We anticipate the
FTIP amendment to be approved within the next three weeks and subsequent approval from
Caltrans of our RFA package to follow shortly thereafter. We are planning to award a
construction contract within 90 days of approval and subsequently satisfy our claim for SB821
programs funds.
Your serious consideration of our request to extend the time for a period of twelve months to
claim approved funds will allow us to move forward with the construction of this much needed
pedestrian facility.
Sincerely,
Greg Bfitl+
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: Jon Salazar - Associate Engineer — Capital Projects
Rudy Graciano — Revenue Manager, Finance
Julie Dauer — Sr. CII' Specialist, Department of Public Works
Project File
RAC IP\PROJECTS1PW051PW05-11 SG Creek Ped HridgeTetters\RCTC-SB821-ExtensionRgst-lune2011.jed,doc
62
ATTACHMENT 2
PW05-11— Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek
Project Timeline
Date
Milestone
Remarks
September
2008
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES)
Submitted seven (7) copies to Caltrans Local
Assistance
November
2008
Received comments from Caltrans
regarding PES submittal
Various comments received from Local
Assistance, Hazardous Waste, Air, Noise,
Cultural Studies, and Biological Studies and
Permits
November
2008
Response to comments completed by City
All items requested by Caltrans to be
addressed either by form or action to be
completed by City consultant
12/2/08
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES)
Form Approved by Caltrans, required
studies identified
Caltrans approved the PES, with required
studies including NES(MI), Noise, Hazardous
Material, Section 106, HPSR, detailed APE
Map, ASR, etc.
May 2009
First submittal of cultural & biological
reports to Caltrans
June -July
2009
Review of APE, ASR, and Cultural Studies
performed by Caltrans on first submittal
Extensive comments from Caltrans to further
address ASR to SER guidelines, specific
elements to be included on APE map, Native
American consultation, and in-depth
paleontological study is required; PIR & PER
should be prepared. City consultant to
further review comments and complete
additional studies.
October
2009
Second submittal to Caltrans
January
2010
Response from Caltrans on second
submittal
Biological reports now appear to require
extensive revision; cultural reports also again
require extensive revision. More comments
regarding HPSR, APE, NES(MI), etc. Note
that there was a key personnel change at
Caltrans between the first and second
submittals
March
2010
Third submittal to Caltrans
April 2010
Caltrans response received (note that an
expedited review was requested)
Additional revisions required to cultural
reports: HPSR, ASR, and Native American
consultation & correspondence to be further
addressed. Requires additional submittal
and considerable review time.
63
4/20/10
Meeting held with Caltrans for final
approval/sign-off on cultural reports
Prior to this meeting, extensive phone
coordination had taken place between
Caltrans and the City's environmental
consultant to work out all required revisions
to cultural reports. It was thus anticipated
that at the meeting, it would simply be
verified that the reports reflected the results
of the Caltrans-consultant coordination. In
the meeting, Caltrans identified that formal
government -to -government consultation
would be required for two Native American
tribes, a fact that had been previously
unidentified. Caltrans provided their first
notification to the tribes on 4/20/10; they
have 30 days to respond.
5/20/10
Received signed CE
Received notification & final signed CE from
Caltrans for environmental clearance.
June 2010
Submitted RFA package to Caltrans
Mailed 6/18/10 RFA for Construction to
Caltrans. Package included all documents
required per Exhibit 3D checklist, including 3
sets of plans & specifications.
July 2010
Received request from Caltrans to revise
certain forms within RFA package
Prepared revised originals per Caltrans
request & returned 7/13/10 - Exhibit3D —
insert ROW Cert #1—Pending & add
signature on page 3-3
July 2010
Received request from Caltrans to include
Exhibit 12A
Prepared Exhibit 12A & submitted via e-mail
7/29/10
August
2010
Received request from Caltrans to submit
revised Finance Letter
Prepared revised Finance Letter to exclude
PE & CE items of work — Returned revised
Finance Letter 8/3/10
August
2010
Although previously advised that a USACE
404 permit would not be required for this
project, Corps has determined that, as
currently designed, a 404 permit will be
required
To avoid this requirement, a redesign of the
east bridge abutment is initiated
September
2010
Although never previously required, word
received from Caltrans that all resource
agency permits will need to be in place
before processing of RFA can be completed
Pursuit of resource agency permits
accelerated to urgent level
November
2010
Streambed Alteration Agreement
(notification of none required) received
from DFG
January
2011
Permit waivers received from USACE and
RWQCB
All resource agency permitting and
environrifental clearances now in place
64
"
"
"
M a r c h
2 0 1 1
N o t i f i c a t i o n r e c e i v e d f r o m C a l t r a n s t h a t
R F A p r o c e s s i n g c a n n o t c o n t i n u e u n t i l
R C F C D E n c r o a c h m e n t P e r m i t i s i s s u e d
P u r s u i t o f R C F C D E n c r o a c h m e n t P e r m i t
a c c e l e r a t e d t o u r g e n t l e v e l
A p r i l 2 0 1 1
R C F C D E n c r o a c h m e n t P e r m i t i s s u e d
A p r i l 2 0 1 1
R F A r e s u b m i t t e d t o C a l t r a n s L o c a l
A s s i s t a n c e
M a y 2 0 1 1
R F A t r a n s m i t t e d t o C a l t r a n s H e a d q u a r t e r s
f o r f i n a l a p p r o v a l
M a y 2 0 1 1
W o r d r e c e i v e d f r o m C a l t r a n s H e a d q u a r t e r s
t h a t p r o j e c t h a d b e e n d r o p p e d f r o m F T I P
E f f o r t s u n d e r w a y t o r e i n s t a t e p r o j e c t t o F T I P
J u n e 2 0 1 1
R e i n s t a t e m e n t o f p r o j e c t i n F T I P
C o o r d i n a t e d e f f o r t s w i t h R C T C , C a l t r a n s
H e a d q u a r t e r s & S C A G t o i n c o r p o r a t e p r o j e c t
i n A m e n d m e n t # 9 f o r F T I P
J u l y 2 0 1 1
R F A A p p r o v a l
A f t e r F T I P u p d a t e , w e s h o u l d r e c e i v e
i m m e d i a t e a p p r o v a l o f o u r R F A p a c k a g e
f r o m C a l t r a n s t o p r o c e e d w i t h a d v e r t i s e m e n t
& a w a r d
A u g u s t
2 0 1 1
B i d O p e n i n g
I n J u l y p l a c e a d v e r t i s e m e n t f o r p r o j e c t , 2 - 3
w e e k s & r e c o r d b i d o p e n i n g
S e p t e m b e r
2 0 1 1
A w a r d C o n t r a c t
A w a r d C o n t r a c t a t C i t y C o u n c i l m e e t i n g t o
l o w e s t r e s p o n s i b l e b i d d e r . I m p l e m e n t
c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e o f w o r k .
D e c e m b e r
2 0 1 1
P r o j e c t C o m p l e t i o n �
B a s e d o n t h e p r o j e c t e d t i m e l i n e , i t i s
a n t i c i p a t e d t h a t t h e p r o j e c t w i l l b e c o m p l e t e
b y t h e e n d o f t h e c a l e n d a r y e a r .
6 5
ATTACHMENT 3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM
ADOPTED POLICIES
• The Commission will not allocate funds to a project in its approved SB 821 Program until the sponsoring
agency awards a contract for the construction of the project or until local agency forces begin construction
of the project. (12/18/86)
• If funds for a project are not claimed prior to the end of the fiscal year, the project will be deleted from the
program and the funds will be reprogrammed in the next fiscal year's SB 821 Program. (12/18/86)
• A project sponsor may request an extension of time beyond June 30th if substantial progress has been made
on the project which, at minimum, would mean completion of preliminary engineering. (12/18/86)
• Funds allocated for projects in FY 86/87 and prior years must be spent or encumbered (construction
contract awarded) by December 31, 1987, or the funds and interest eamed on the funds shall be returned to
the SB 821 Account. (12/18/86)
***Following four policies pertain to multi -year projects***
• Cities and the County may submit applications for projects to be funded over a 2-3 year period with
engineering in year 1 and construction in years 2 and 3. (9/2/87)
• Multi -year projects approved in the Commission's program shall be given priority for funding in years 2-3
over new projects submitted and approved. (9/2/87)
• When actual construction and/or right-of-way costs are not more than 15% over the initial application cost
estimate, the increase will be funded by SB 821 funds, if requested by the applicant, during the
development of the annual program by the Commission. (9/2/87)
• When actual construction and/or right-of-way costs are more than 15% above the initial application
estimate, the applicant may either fund costs in excess of 15% with local funds or resubmit the project as a
new project for consideration by the Commission. (9/2/87)
• Any unused SB 821 Program funds must be returned to the Commission unless that agency can a)
demonstrate why the costs were substantially lower than the estimate; and b) utilize the unused funds to
complete approved but unfunded projects. (12/11/91)
• No agency will be allowed to carryover unused funds for projects not previously included in an application
(annual project proposals) submitted to the Commission for consideration. (12/11/91)
• The Commission will not award funds for projects that do not meet physical accessibility standards (i.e.
California Government Code 4450, Civil Code 51 Et. Seq., Title 24 of the California Building Code,
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990). (4/12/95)
• An agency will have twenty-four (24) months from the time of the allocation to complete the project using
local forces or award a construction contract. There will be no time extensions granted unless the project is
part of a larger, federally funded project, which has been delayed beyond the agency's control. Also,
projects requiring coordination with another public agency that has been delayed beyond the agency's
control may receive one twelve-month extension, if necessary. Projects not completed or awarded within
the twenty-four months will be deleted from the program, and the funds will be reprogrammed in the next
fiscal year's SR 821 Program. (3/12/03)
RCTC: 3/20/03
66
"
"
"
R I V E R S I D E
C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
J u n e 2 7 , 2 0 1 1
T O :
B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
J o h n S t a n d i f o r d , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
T H R O U G H :
A n n e M a y e r , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l L e g i s l a t i v e U p d a t e
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i t t e e t o :
1 ) R e c e i v e a n u p d a t e o n s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l l e g i s l a t i o n ;
2 ) A d o p t t h e f o l l o w i n g b i l l p o s i t i o n s :
a ) S B 4 4 6 ( D u t t o n ) - S u p p o r t ;
b ) H R 1 8 2 5 ( B l u m e n a u e r ) S u p p o r t ;
c ) S . 1 0 3 4 ( S c h u m e r ) - S u p p o r t ; a n d
3 ) F o r w a r d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a c t i o n .
B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N :
S t a t e U p d a t e
B u d g e t P i c t u r e R e m a i n s M u r k y
A t t h e t i m e t h i s s t a f f r e p o r t w a s w r i t t e n , R e p u b l i c a n s a n d D e m o c r a t s i n t h e S t a t e
S e n a t e h a d f a i l e d t o c o m e t o a n a g r e e m e n t o n a s t a t e b u d g e t o v e r t h e w e e k e n d o f
J u n e 1 1 . T h e m a i n s t i c k i n g p o i n t r e g a r d s t h e i s s u e o f e x t e n d i n g t h e c u r r e n t s a l e s
a n d i n c o m e t a x r a t e s a l o n g w i t h s u s t a i n i n g a n i n c r e a s e i n v e h i c l e r e g i s t r a t i o n f e e s .
T h e G o v e r n o r w a s s e e k i n g a n e x t e n s i o n o f t h e c u r r e n t r a t e s a s a p r e c u r s o r t o a n
e l e c t i o n . I n r e s p o n s e , S e n a t e P r e s i d e n t P r o T e m D a r r e l l S t e i n b e r g i n t r o d u c e d a b i l l
t o e x p a n d t h e t a x i n g a u t h o r i t y f o r l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t s . M o s t o b s e r v e r s b e l i e v e t h a t
S e n a t o r S t e i n b e r g ' s l e g i s l a t i o n w a s b e i n g u s e d a s a t o o l t o f o r c e n e g o t i a t i o n s a n d
w o u l d b e i m p r a c t i c a l t o i m p l e m e n t i f a p p r o v e d .
I n s p i t e o f t h e w r a n g l i n g r e g a r d i n g t a x e s , t h e r e a p p e a r s t o b e a g e n e r a l c o n s e n s u s
o n t h e t r e a t m e n t o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i s s u e s , w h i c h w o u l d i n c l u d e t h e a p p r o p r i a t i o n o f
$ 1 b i l l i o n i n P r o p o s i t i o n 1 B b o n d f u n d i n g i n a n t i c i p a t i o n o f a b o n d s a l e . T h e r e a l s o
s e e m s t o b e g e n e r a l c o n s e n s u s o n t h e n e e d f o r i m p r o v e d o v e r s i g h t a n d c h a n g e s
r e g a r d i n g t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f t h e s t a t e ' s h i g h - s p e e d r a i l e f f o r t .
A g e n d a I t e m 1 3
6 7
Legislature Approves AJR 4
Assembly Joint Resolution 4, authored by Assembly Member Jeff Miller (R-Corona),
which expresses the California Legislature's support for a Transportation
Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) grant for the State Route 91
Corridor Improvement Project was approved by the Senate on June 14, and will be
sent to President Obama and Secretary LaHood. In many instances, TIFIA funding
is often supported by state interests. The approval of the resolution adds a level of
state support making the Commission's TIFIA application even more compelling to
evaluators in Washington, D.C.
SB 446 Creation of Ontario International Airport Authority
While officials in Los Angeles have often stated their support for "regionalizing"
passenger air traffic in Southern California, the recent experience of Ontario
International Airport paints a far different picture regarding air travel in Southern
California. Passenger travel through Ontario International Airport has declined by
more than a third since 2007. While a significant portion of the decline can be
attributed to the economy, an opposing argument can be made that a lack of
support for the Ontario International Airport is hindering a local economic recovery.
SB 446 by Senate Minority Leader Bob Dutton (R-Rancho Cucamonga) seeks to
bring Ontario International Airport under local control through the creation of a new
joint powers authority comprised of seven members appointed by the Ontario City
Council and the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors. The language allows
for a specified number of members to be appointed who are, "...representatives
of the primary air service market served by Ontario International Airport and need
not be persons residing in the City of Ontario or the County of San Bernardino,"
thus allowing for representation from the larger Inland Empire area.
The Commission's legal jurisdiction regarding air traffic is essentially non-existent.
The Commission is strictly a surface transportation agency; however the area's
economy depends on access to air travel and the Commission recognizes the need
to fully utilize assets such as the airports in Ontario and Palm Springs, as well as
the extensive network of general aviation and freight facilities.
Senator Dutton's bill seeks to realize the value of the asset through local input and
control while requiring close cooperation among local agencies including the city of
Los Angeles, which currently operates the facility.
Agenda Item 13
•
•
•
68
"
"
"
F e d e r a l U p d a t e
F o r a n u m b e r o f y e a r s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n h a s b e e n o n r e c o r d i n s u p p o r t i n g e f f o r t s t o
p r o v i d e m o r e l a t i t u d e f o r e m p l o y e r s t o o f f e r c o m m u t i n g i n c e n t i v e s o n a p r e - t a x
b a s i s . T h i s a l l o w s e m p l o y e r s t o p r o v i d e b e n e f i t s t h a t i n c l u d e t r a n s i t p a s s e s ,
s u b s i d i e s f o r v a n p o o l c o s t s a n d o t h e r c o m m u t i n g e x p e n s e s t h a t a r e e x e m p t u p t o a
c e r t a i n l e v e l f r o m t a x a t i o n . T h e A m e r i c a n R e c o v e r y a n d R e i n v e s t m e n t A c t ( A R R A )
c o m m o n l y k n o w n a s t h e s t i m u l u s b i l l r a i s e d t h e l i m i t o n w h a t c a n b e e x c l u d e d
f r o m p e r s o n a l i n c o m e t a x e s f r o m $ 1 2 0 p e r m o n t h t o $ 2 3 0 p e r m o n t h . T h e r a i s e i n
t h e l i m i t w a s t e m p o r a r y a n d i s s e t t o e x p i r e a t t h e e n d o f t h i s y e a r .
H R 1 8 2 5 b y C o n g r e s s m a n E a r l B l u m e n a u e r ( D - O r e g o n ) a n d S . 1 0 3 4 b y S e n a t o r
C h a r l e s S c h u m e r ( D - N e w Y o r k ) w i l l e x t e n d t h e c u r r e n t p r o g r a m s u n t i l 2 0 1 4 . T h i s
i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s l e g i s l a t i v e p l a t f o r m a d o p t e d i n D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 0
w h i c h s t a t e s :
" C o n g r e s s s h o u l d a p p r o v e t a x b e n e f i t s a n d / o r i n c e n t i v e s f o r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n
d e m a n d m a n a g e m e n t p r o g r a m s a n d a l t e r n a t i v e f u e l p r o g r a m s t o p r o m o t e t h e
u s e o f a l t e r n a t e m o d e s o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n . "
B o t h o f t h e f e d e r a l b i l l s w e r e r e c e n t l y i n t r o d u c e d a n d n o c o m m i t t e e h e a r i n g s a r e
s c h e d u l e d i n t h e i m m e d i a t e f u t u r e .
A g e n d a I t e m 1 3
6 9