HomeMy Public PortalAbout06 June 15, 2009 Technical Advisory CommitteeTIME:
DATE:
LOCATION:
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MEETING AGENDA*
10:00 A.M.
June 15, 2009
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA
Conference Room A, 3rd Floor
*By request, agenda and minutes may be available in alternative format; i.e. large print, tape.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs
Bill Bayne, City of Cathedral City
Tom Boyd, City of Riverside
Duane Burk, City of Banning
Greg Butler, City of Temecula
Kip Field, City of Corona
Mike Gow, City of Hemet
Mark Greenwood, City of Palm Desert
Patrick Nally, Caltrans District 8
Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage
Jonathan Hoy, City of Desert Hot Springs
Tim Jonasson, City of La Quinta
Michael Kashiwagi, City of Wildomar
Eunice Lovi, SunLine Transit
Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake, Perris and
San Jacinto
Juan Perez, County of Riverside
Kishen Prathivadi, City of Beaumont
Jim Rodkey, City of Blythe
Ken Seumalo, City of Lake Elsinore
Jim Smith, City of Indio
Mark Stanley, Riverside Transit Agency
Ruthanne Taylor Berger, WRCOG
Patrick Thomas, City of Murrieta
Bill Thompson, City of Norco
Paul Toor, City of Coachella
Chris Vogt, City of Moreno Valley
Allyn Waggle, CVAG
Tim Wassil, City of Indian Wells
Carlos Zamano, City of Calimesa
Commission Staff
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda.
TIME: 10:00 A.M.
DATE: June 15, 2009
LOCATION: Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA
Conference Room A, 3rd Floor
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and government Code Section 54954.2, if you
need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact Riverside County
Transportation Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will
assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. SELF -INTRODUCTIONS
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda.
Comments relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is
before the Committee.)
5. MAINTENANCE AND USAGE OF RIVTAM MODEL (Verbal Presentation)
6. STIP/ARRA UPDATES (Verbal Presentation)
7. 2009 MEASURE A MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT BASE YEAR (Attachment)
8. MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FIVE-YEAR CIP (Verbal Presentation)
9. PROGRAMMING DATABASE (Verbal Presentation)
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
June 15, 2009
Page 2
10. RTIP/RTP UPDATES (Attachment)
11. LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE (Verbal Presentation)
12. COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS (Verbal Presentation)
13. OTHER BUSINESS
14. ADJOURNMENT (The next meeting will be July 20, 2009, 10:00 A.M., in
Riverside.)
MINUTES
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
MINUTES
Monday, April 201 2009
1. Call to Order
The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:00 A.M. at
Beaumont City Hall, Conference Room #2, 550 East Sixth Street, Beaumont, CA
92223.
2. Self -Introductions
Members Present: Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs
Ed Basubas, City of Lake Elsinore
Bill Bayne, City of Cathedral City
Tom Boyd, City of Riverside
Greg Butler, City of Temecula
Mike Gow, City of Hemet
Mark Greenwood, City of Palm Desert
Patrick Hally, Ca!trans District 8
Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage
Alfonso Hernandez, SunLine Transit Agency
Tim Jonasson, City of La Quinta
Prem Kumar, City of Moreno Valley
Bob Morin, City of Corona
Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake, Perris, San Jacinto
Nick Nickerson, City of LaQuinta
Kahono Oei, City of Banning
Kishen Prathivadi, City of Beaumont
Tom Rafferty, City of Indio
Patty Romo, County of Riverside
Michael Shoberg, CVAG
Jim Smith, City of Indio
Mark Stanley, Riverside Transit Agency
Patrick Thomas, City of Murrieta
Carlos Zamano, City of Calimesa
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
April 20, 2009
Page 2
Others Present:
Grace Alvarez, RCTC
Dug Begley, Press Enterprise
Mark Chappell, City of Coachella
Martha Durbin, RCTC
Shirley Gooding, RCTC
Aaron Hake, RCTC
Kevin Hughes, City of Beaumont
Chris Igbinedion, Caltrans District 8
Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley
Shirley Medina, RCTC
Basem Muallem, Caltrans District 8
Anne Schneider, Willdan
Alex Serena, WRCOG
Theresia Trevino, RCTC
Andrea Zureick, RCTC
3. Approval of Minutes
Approved as submitted.
4. Public Comments
There were no public comments.
S. REVISIONS TO THE 2009 MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS
PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT GUIDELINES
Theresia Trevino, RCTC, stated that as a result of a December 2008 request to
the TAC that calculations for the new Measure base year Maintenance of Effort
(MOE) requirement be made and provided to RCTC, responses have been
received from all but 3 cities. There were a lot more petitions for special
consideration compared to past years. When the MOE guidelines were approved
in 2007, economic times were better. Many cities requested relief from the MOE
requirement and legal counsel could not provide exemptions to not have to
adhere to the MOE requirement. The MOE requirement is written in state law for
the self help county sales taxes. The ordinance states, in section 7, The
Maintenance of Effort:
"The Commission, by the enactment of this ordinance, intends the
additional funds provided government agencies by this chapter to supplement
existing local revenues and required developer improvements being used for
transportation purposes. The government agencies shall maintain their existing
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
April 20, 2009
Page 3
commitment of local funds for street, highway and public transit purposes
pursuant to this Ordinance, and the Commission shall enforce this section by
appropriate actions including fiscal audits of the local agencies."
She further stated that with that in mind, as staff went through the various MOE
calculations and petitions for special consideration, a few issues were found that
required more clean-up on the MOE guidelines. One of the revisions is that the
"base year" amount shall be no less than the preceding MOE requirement. In
this case, for the first 10-year period, it cannot be any less than the 1989 MOE
base year.
Ms. Trevino provided a worksheet that offers some of the analysis that was
done. Two changes were made to the requirements last week because of the
definition of `extraordinary" and in trying to come up with some common
ground. Fiscal year 2007/08 is still the starting point — the primary
measurement. If, as several of the local agencies have indicated, the 2007/08
includes extraordinary expenditures, the local agencies can utilize the next
alternatives which were in the previous guidelines but that now has changed the
three years averaging to be 2004/05 through 2006/07. Basically, 2007/08 has
been taken out of the equation. If the three -years that are being averaged do
not provide a result that seems reasonable, the next step would be to utilize the
2006/07 local discretionary funds reported to the State Controller's office.
Therefore, if you deem 2007/08 extraordinary, take out 2007/08 and do a three
year averaging or use 2006/07 and/or petition for special consideration.
Part of the clean-up language that was done was that if you do not meet your
full MOE requirement, you will not be eligible for Measure A allocations in the
following year. The carryover of the MOE was limited to the three preceding
years rather than an unlimited carryover. Those, based on staff's review with
legal counsel, were necessary. Staff will take the MOE guideline revisions to the
Budget and Implementation Committee next week and to the Commission at the
May meeting. She suggested that the cities review their MOE calculations based
on the revised guidelines.
Some cities did use a three year average or petitioned for special consideration.
Getting revised submittals by May 22, would allow these MOE calculations to be
taken to the Commission for the June meeting. CIP packages would be required
for the July meeting, which will put everything in motion to start receiving
payments under the new Measure starting in September.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
April 20, 2009
Page 4
With this announcement of the revisions to the MOE guidelines, the local.
agencies have another opportunity to look at the MOEs. It is hoped that with
these new guidelines there will be fewer petitions for special consideration.
Ms. Trevino responded to various related questions.
Motion to hold all the guidelines until May.
3 in favor of motion
10 opposed
La Quinta abstained
Ms. Trevino stated that if the above motion is passed, the cities cannot get their
money until about October. She indicated that staff cannot take CIP packages to
the Commission until there is a MOE.
M/S/C (Gow/Harry) to define discretionary funding and to
recommend five year average in lieu of 3 year average starting in
2007 going back five years, otherwise adopt proposed revisions.
Theresia indicated that during this meeting she requested advice from RCTC's
legal counsel and received a response that regarding the five year averaging,
legal counsel does not have a problem with that.
6. FY 2009/10 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM
PROJECT CALL REMINDER
Martha Durbin reminded the TAC that she replaced Jerry Rivera as the SB 821
coordinator following his retirement from RCTC.
She referred to the March 19, 2009 letter that she sent to all Public Works
Directors and City Managers in Riverside County regarding the FY 2009/10 SB
821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program. She stated that approximately $1
million is estimated to be available for the program. The applications are due to
RCTC no later than 2:00 p.m., Friday, May 1, 2009. She requested that three
TAC members from non -submitting agencies volunteer to participate in the
evaluation committee on May 27, 2009 8:30 A.M. She asked that volunteers
contact her no later than May 1.
Volunteers were: Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage
Caltrans volunteered someone from Local Assistance
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
April 20, 2009
Page 5
7. ARRA TE AND STIP TE PROGRAMMING FOR REMAINDER OF FY
2008/09
Shirley Medina, RCTC, stated that there are TE funds that need to be spent by
June 30, 2009. The following projects are ready to proceed with construction
and have been recommended for additional funding:
• Palm Springs, Gene Autry Trail
• Riverside, Alessandro Boulevard
• Temecula, Winchester Road
M/S/C (Motlagh/Harry) to approve programming additional ARRA
TE and STIP TE funding to maximize and prevent lapse of both
sources of funds.
8. FY 2008/09 OBLIGATION DELIVERY PLAN
Andrea Zureick, RCTC, said that the FY 2008/09 Obligation Delivery Plan that
was submitted to Caltrans Local Assistance on April 1, 2009 was compiled from
the project sponsors on the current status of the projects. She asked that the
local agencies review the projects and if there are any potential delays, let staff
know as soon as possible.
On June 1, STP and CMAQ funds that are available for RCTC becomes available
to any agency in the state. After that, there is less of a guarantee that funding
will be available to obligate. She further stated that $10 or $11 million is
expected to come in for obligation after June.
9. 2008 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTIP)
AMENDMENT STATUS
Grace Alvarez, RCTC, reported that since the adoption of the 2008 Regional
Transportation Improvement Program in November 2008, RCTC has processed
four administrative modifications totaling 16 projects and five formal
amendments totaling 212 projects. Six of the nine submittals have been
approved. Formal amendment No. 9 was approved by Caltrans on April 10th —
FHWA/FTA approval is anticipated by the end of this week. Formal amendment
No. 12 that includes the ARRA transit projects is pending approval as well as the
administrative modification No. 14 that includes minor funding adjustments to
the ARRA-funded highway projects.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
April 20, 2009
Page 6
She said that as soon as the amendments and administrative modification
receive approval by the funding agencies, SCAG will open up the opportunity for
regular (non-ARRA related amendments). At that time, RCTC will communicate
this information to the local agencies via e-mail, requesting project changes for
inclusion in the upcoming amendment.
10. CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ENVIRONMENTAL
PROCESS
Andrea Zureick stated that a requirement of the California Transportation
Commission (CTC) is that whenever funds are being voted by the CTC for any
phase after environmental, the completion of the environmental process must be
verified and the project approved for future funding. She referenced the
"Process for Submitting Environmental Information to the California
Transportation Commission" attached to her staff report.
11. LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE
Chris Igbinedion, Caltrans District 8, stated that on the DBE approval, the
turnaround is on a first priority basis. When projects are submitted to Local
Assistance, the local agencies should follow up with the coordinator. The
turnaround time is less than two weeks.
12. COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS
• HIGH PRIORITY PROJECT REQUESTS FOR FEDERAL
AUTHORIZATION
Aaron Hake, RCTC, said that the House Transportation and Infrastructure (T&I)
Committee is in the midst of writing language for the next federal transportation
authorization bill. He stated that the members of Congress are asking for high
priority projects.
His highlights included the following:
• Vetting Commission Priority Projects
• Congressional Criteria
• Alameda Corridor East Grade Separations in Riverside County
• Interstate 215 Corridor Improvements
• Interstate 10 Corridor Improvements
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
April 20, 2009
Page 7
He further stated that the rationale for selecting those corridors is that the T&I
has set high standards for what they will consider for high priority designations
in the bill.
He reviewed the Congressional criteria, e.g.,
• Is the project of national or regional significance?
• How likely is construction of the project to begin during the term of the
Act?
• Is the project explicitly supported by the state or local government
agency?
At the direction of the ad hoc committee, and the Commission staff will begin
preparing documentation to support each High Priority Project request. The
Commission approved this three corridor concept and the projects within those
corridors as well as direction of work with regional partner agencies in the
development of a coordinated advocacy strategy.
Due to the deadlines provided by the T&I Committee, time will be of the essence.
The May 8 deadline for members to submit project requests to T&I likely means
that Members will ask the Commission to submit its projects for review one or
two weeks ahead of the May 8 deadline. Given that these instructions were given
last week, it did not provide for a normal course for full Commission
consideration before the May 8 deadline. The ad hoc committee's
recommendation was taken to the full Commission.
As the introductory paragraph to this staff report indicates, the timing of
authorization activities has been a constant question since federal economic
stimulus legislation began to be contemplated late last year. Despite Chairman
Oberstar's assertions that the House will move quickly to pass a new bill, it is not
yet known what Speaker Pelosi's disposition is and few details about the Senate's
calendar (other than Senator Boxer's pledge to do a bill on -time) are known.
13. OTHER BUSINESS
Shirley Medina stated that as part of the federal stimulus, RCTC is moving
forward with a local stimulus which will utilize $18 million of Measure A that is
currently programmed on the I-215/SR-74 Interchange. That project is also
programmed for TUMF funds. Staff is looking at a way to replace the $18 million
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
April 20, 2009
Page 8
in Measure A with the STIP. It will also be necessary to secure $14 million of the
TUMF funds and staff is working with WRCOG. WRCOG will convene a meeting
to review the priorities for the remainder of the year. Moving forward with the
local stimulus will not occur until funding is secured. Ms. Medina indicated that
staff will update the TAC at the next meeting.
14. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory
Committee, the meeting adjourned at approximately 11:30 A.M. The next
meeting is scheduled for May 18, 2009, 10:00 A.M., Riverside County
Transportation Commission, Riverside County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon
Street, Riverside, CA, Conference Room A, 3rd Floor.
Respectfully submitted,
CiAALLegitA2€441C,
"ifilShirley Medina
Programming and Planning Manager
AGENDA ITEM 5
A presentation willbe made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 5.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
TRANSPORTATION AND
LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY
Transportation Department
Details for Agenda Item 5
RCTC TAC Meeting
June 15, 2009
Riverside County Traffic Analysis Model (RivTAM)
Juan C. Perez, EE., T.E.
Director of Transportation
1. Introduction
a) RivTAM background (validated to 2007, 2035 forecast, based on SCAG
regional model, refined within Riverside County)
b) Participants in RivTAM development process
c) SCAG Conformity Achieved (mention letter and present highlights)
2. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Maintenance, Update, and Use of
RivTAM
3. Formation of Ad Hoc Committee to select qualified consultants (Action)
4. Formation of Technical Task Force to establish sub -area model conformity
guidelines'
a) Responsibilities
i. Develop guidelines to ensure conformity of sub -area models with
RivTAM
ii. On an on -going and as -needed basis, review sub -area models for
conformity based on established guidelines
i. Representation
6/12/2009
4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor • Riverside, California 92501 • (951) 955-6740
P.O. Box 1090 • Riverside, California 92502-1090 • FAX (951) 955-3198
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION of
GOVERNMENTS
Main Office
818 West Seventh Street
12th Floor
Los Angeles, California
90017-3435
t (213) 236-1800
f (213) 236-1825
www.scag.ca.gov
Officers
President
Richard Dixon, Lake Forest
First Vice President
Harry Baldwin, San Gabriel
Second Vice President
Jon Edney, El Centro
Immediate Past President
Gary Ovitt, San Bernardino County
Policy Committee Chairs
Executive/Administration
Richard Dixon, Lake Forest
Community. Economic and
Human Development
Larry McCallon, Highland
Energy & Environment
Keith Hanks, Azusa
Transportation
Mike Ten, South Pasadena
March 9, 2009
Mr. George Johnson
Director, Transportation and Land Management Agency
Transportation Department
County of Riverside
PO Box 1090
Riverside, Ca. 92502-1090
Re: Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model
Dear Mr. Johnson,
The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the results of the Southern
California Association of Governments' (SCAG) review of the new
Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RivTAM). SCAG's
modeling staff has been actively participating in the development of
RivTAM and also performed a detailed review of the Model's
documentation and modeling results. Based on SCAG's participation and
the model review, we believe that the Riverside County Transportation
Model is consistent with SCAG's Regional Travel Demand Model.
State and Federal regulations require model consistency for specific
applications. Beyond the regulatory requirements, model consistency is
universally accepted as sound modeling practice. Basing subregional
models on existing regional models, helps guarantee model consistency,
reduces model development costs, and greatly increases the credibility and
defensibility of the subregional model. SCAG is especially interested in
promoting the development of consistent subregional models, to insure
that modeling analysis and project recommendations for inclusion into the
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) are evaluated using similar modeling
tools.
SCAG has developed the Draft Subregional Modeling Guidelines
explaining the benefits and considerations relating to model consistence;
the key considerations are listed below:
Model Methodology — To ensure model consistency, SCAG
recommends that the model methodology be consistent with the
Regional Model's methodology and parameters. RivTAM uses
essentially an identical modeling methodology and framework as
SCAG's Regional Model. Adjustments and refinements to model
parameters were made to better replicate local travel.
The Regional Council is comprised of 83 elected officials representing 187 cities, six counties, five County Transportation Commissions,
Imperial Valley Association of Governments and a Tribal Government representative within Southern California.
11.18.03
Mr. George Johnson
March 9, 2009
page 2
Model Inputs — A critical requirement of model consistency is that the subregional
model use model inputs that are consistent with the Region's official forecast. RivTAM
uses equivalent or identical model inputs. The socio-economic data is based on SCAG's
adopted forecast which was further disaggregated into the County's finer subregional
zone system. The highway and transit networks are essentially the Regional networks
with the addition of local roads and minor transit routes.
Model Outputs — The goal of model consistency is to ensure that the Subregional and
Regional Models produce similar modeling results. Outputs from RivTAM and the
Regional Model were carefully evaluated and compared. The model results from the
two models are essentially the same.
Model Documentation — Good/complete model documentation is essential for ensuring
a thorough understanding of the model and greatly enhances the defensibility of the
model. RivTAM is very well documented. The model documentation includes a
thorough description of the inputs, modeling process, and model validation results. In
addition, the documentation also includes a User's Guide.
Model Review and Outreach — The RivTAM development process was guided by both
a policy and technical advisory committee. The Committees were composed of the
major stakeholders, modeling experts, and affected parties. Caltrans and SCAG were
active participants in both committees. The County did a very good job of considering
stakeholder input and was very open to comments. In addition, County Staff presented
an overview of their Model at the September 24, 2008 Modeling Task Force Meeting,
which was favorably received by Task Force members.
SCAG has no specific authority to determine the consistency of a Subregional Model.
However, similar to the other county -wide modeling efforts, the County of Riverside has
chosen to develop a consistent model. The County should be commended for their efforts to
work closely with the major modeling stakeholders including Caltrans and SCAG to develop a
quality product that should meet the County's modeling needs for years to come. Based on
SCAG's active participation in the model development process and our review of the model
documentation, we are confident that the Model is both credible and consistent. SCAG looks
forward to continuing our close working relationship which will not only benefit both of our
modeling programs, but will also provide value to the entire Southern California modeling
community.
Sine
Hdasha
Director, Planning Methods, Assessment & Compliance
cc: Farah Khorashadi
DOCs #150047
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MOU FOR RIVTAM MODEL MAINTENANCE, UPDATE, AND USAGE
WHEREAS the Riverside County Transportation Department (RCTD), the Riverside
County Transportation Commission (RCTC), the Western Riverside Council of Governments
(WRCOG), and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) jointly funded the
development of the Riverside County. Traffic Analysis Model (RIVTAM) using TransCAD software,
WHEREAS the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) participated actively in the development of RIVTAM
by providing data, guidance, and review of RIVTAM materials,
WHEREAS SCAG has attested that RIVTAM has been developed in conformance with
SCAG modeling guidelines and procedures,
WHEREAS SCAG wishes to ensure that any sub -area models developed for use in
Riverside County conform to RIVTAM,
WHEREAS RCTD, RCTC, WRCOG, CVAG, SCAG, and Caltrans agree that RIVTAM
will be used as the Countywide tool for Transportation Planning purposes,
WHEREAS RCTD, RCTC, WRCOG, CVAG, SCAG, and Caltrans wish that incorporated
Cities in Riverside County use RIVTAM as the basis for their own transportation planning purposes
where appropriate,
WHEREAS RCTD, RCTC, WRCOG, CVAG, SCAG, and Caltrans wish that private
entities, such as developers and consultants use RIVTAM as the basis for their own transportation
planning purposes in Riverside County where appropriate,
NOW THEREFORE, RCTD, RCTC, WRCOG, CVAG, SCAG, and Caltrans (collectively,
the Agencies) agree as follows:
RIVTAM Maintenance and Updates:
RCTD will be responsible for the maintenance and update of RIVTAM, including the
purchasing of a maintenance contract from Caliper Corporation, the developer of the software for
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
RIVTAM;
RCTD, RCTC, WRCOG, CVAG will share the cost of maintaining and updating RIVTAM;
RCTD, CVAG, and SCAG have licensing agreements with Caliper Corporation and have
the capability to use RIVTAM;
RCTC, WRCOG, and Caltrans would need licensing agreements with Caliper should
they desire to use RIVTAM;
RCTD will inform RCTC, WRCOG, CVAG, SCAG, and Caltrans when updates are made
to RIVTAM;
RCTC, WRCOG, CVAG, SCAG, and Caltrans will notify RCTD when they make any
updates to RIVTAM so that RCTD can maintain an updated version of RIVTAM;
The AGENCIES will not make any updates that are not in conformance with RIVTAM
modeling concepts and assumptions;
Periodic updates of RIVTAM will be made at such time as SCAG adopts new Socio-
Economic forecasts in order that RIVTAM can be kept abreast of SCAG's Regional Modeling process;
Since the AGENCIES anticipate the need to engage the services of consultants from
time to time to run RIVTAM, the AGENCIES will establish a list of three to five consulting firms qualified
to perform such services and use no consultants other than those on the list of qualified consultants;
RCTD will lead the AGENCIES' joint effort to compile the list of qualified consultants, by
issuing a Request for Qualifications and forming a selection committee;
Riverside County Cities and private entities that have a need to use RIVTAM, will be
asked to select a consultant from the AGENCIES' list of qualified consultants;
Use of RIVTAM by entities other than the AGENCIES:
The AGENCIES will establish guidelines for the use of RIVTAM by entities other than the
AGENCIES;
As the entity responsible for the maintenance and update of RIVTAM, RCTD will develop
guidelines for procedures for the use of RIVTAM by entities other than the AGENCIES;
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
RIVTAM data files will be released only to the AGENCIES and to the consultants on the
AGENCIES' list of qualified consultants;
Any data requests such as daily and peak hourly traffic volume forecasts from completed
RIVTAM runs will be made available to Cities or private entities, but a payment to defray the cost of
information retrieval and transmittal will be requested; Alternatively, Cities may contract directly with
the consultants on the AGENCIES' list of qualified consultants to make the necessary RIVTAM runs;
Any requests that require making additional RIVTAM runs will be honored upon the
payment of a negotiated fee payable to RCTD or one of the consulting firms on the list of qualified
consultants;
Technical Guidelines
The AGENCIES will require that any entity that develops a sub -area model based on
RIVTAM for its own use must demonstrate, by submitting appropriate documentation, that the entity's
model is in conformance with RIVTAM before the model can be used for any purpose that affects the
AGENCIES;
Conformity documentation will be reviewed and a conformity determination will be made
jointly by an appointed committee of the AGENCIES;
Conformity guidelines will be developed by a technical task force that may include
representatives of the AGENCIES, Riverside County cities, members of the consultant community, and
others.
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
*- 6
Raiding Prop 42 jeopardizes $746 million in
Riverside County transportation projects
If the Legislature "borrows" transportation dollars to fill the budget shortfall, it will delay
thousands of jobs in Riverside County planned on critical infrastructure projects and
have a domino effect on future congestion relief projects.
The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is funded by Prop 42. Many of
these projects are also reliant on state bonds, which if delayed by the budget crisis could
have a devastating effect. If Prop 42 is diverted to the general fund and the state cannot
sell bonds, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) will have to delay funding to
projects. Delaying infrastructure projects is more costly to the state in the long
run, and stifles job growth that will lead our region's recovery.
Riverside County Job -Creating Infrastructure Projects At -Risk in Budget Crisis
Project
FY 09/10
FY 10/11
SR-74/G St Interchange Reconfiguration
$34,315,000
Auto Center Drive Grade Separation (Corona)
$27,280,000
Iowa Ave Grade Separation (Riverside)
$24,500,000
$ -
I-10/Indian Canyon Dr Interchange Reconfiguration
$30,762,000
$ -
1-10/Date Palm Dr Interchange Reconstruction
$27,000,000
$ -
1-215/California Oaks/Kalmia St Interchange
$27,529,000
$ -
SR-60 East Junction HOV Direct Connectors
$50,085,000
$ -
I-215/Scott Rd to Nuevo Rd Lane Addition
$200,000,000
$ -
French Valley Parkway Interchange Construction (1-15/1-215)
$ -
$104,958,000
I-215/Murrieta Hot Springs Rd to Scott Rd Lane Addition
$ -
$55,100,000
SR-91: Adams to SR-60/I-215 HOV Lanes Construction
$ -
$191,744,000
Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension
$ -
$153,092,000
SR-91/SR-71 Connectors
$ -
$106,000,000
Total Dollars at Risk by FY
$387,156,000
$645,209,000
Total Dollars at Risk in Riverside County
$1,032,365,000
Domino Effect: Lack of funding in FY 09/10 will push projects back to FY 10/11,
creating an 'overflow' of demand on the STIP, jeopardizing FY 10/11 projects as well.
Anti -Stimulus: Federal economic recovery legislation requires that California certify
"maintenance of effort" with regard to transportation funding levels. Depleting state
transportation funds could endanger $2.5 billion of federal funds, including $100 million
in Riverside County. Don't put Califomia's federal stimulus money at risk.
Makes the Budget Worse: Proposition 1A allows the Legislature three years to repay
transportation loans (with interest) to the general fund. We would not expect the
Legislature to make transportation whole again until FY 12/13. By then, the damage will
be done to Riverside County's transportation projects and construction industry jobs with
costly delays. What will the state actually have saved once they repay this commitment?
6wnils tardy Tramperieiim CanMiniss
For more information please contact RCTC Executive Director Anne Mayer at amaver@rctc.org or (951)
787-7141 or Government Relations Manager Aaron Hake at ahakeerctc.orq or (951) 787-7965.
Let's work with our Legislators to find a real budget
solution and fulfill the will of the voters who approved
Propositions 42, IA and 1B - cutting transportation will
not balance the budget.
AGENDA ITEM 6
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 6.
AGENDA ITEM 7
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
June 15, 2009
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager
THROUGH:
Cathy Bechtel, Project Development Director
SUBJECT:
2009 Measure A Maintenance of Effort Base Year
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Technical Advisory Committee approve:
1) Adhering to the 1989 Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Base Year for fiscal year
2009/10 only; and
2) For cities incorporated after 1989, using the Proposition 42 MOE amounts for fiscal
year 2009/10 only.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
At the May 11, 2009 Special TAC meeting, the TAC recommended maintaining the 1989
MOE base year after extensive discussion regarding the State Controller Streets Report and
the inconsistencies and variances involved in the development and reporting of street
expenditures by the State Controller. Further, the TAC recommended allowing more time in
reviewing different calculation methodologies to determine the best base year methodology to
use until the next review cycle in 2010.
There are four cities that did not have a MOE base because they were incorporated after
1989. These cities are: Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Murrieta, and Temecula. Staff reviewed
different calculation methodologies to apply for fiscal year 2009/10 and is recommending the
use of an existing MOE base year that cities currently comply with to receive their Proposition
42 funds. The Proposition 42 MOE is based on the State Controller's Streets Report
averaging general fund expenditures for fiscal years 1996/97 — 1998/1999.
The newly incorporated cities of Wildomar and Menifee will not have a MOE base year until
such time that a three year history of expenditures has been reported.
Attached are the recommended MOE base year amounts for the cities. Staff will continue to
work with the TAC to develop and approve MOE base years for fiscal years 2010/11 —
2019/20.
Fiscal Year 2009/10 Measure A Maintenance of Effort
Western County
Agency
2008 Meas A LSR
Allocation
Banning
$ 692,058
Beaumont
$ 686,232
Calimesa
$ 174,462
Canyon Lake
$ 222,567
Corona
$ 4,790,068
Hemet
$ 1,972,391
Lake Elsinore
$ 1,296,326
Moreno Valley
$ 4,264,317
Murrieta
$ 2,516,817
Norco
$ 828,871
Perris
$ 1,303,501
Riverside
$ 8,433,571
San Jacinto
$ 749, 541
Temecula
$ 3,342,016
Coachella Valley
RCTC/TAC FY 2009/10
Recommendation
1989 MOE
Prop 42
Base Year
MOE
$ 164,325
-
$ 70,702
-
N/A
7,294
N/A
6,063
$ 1,784,399
-
$ 1,183,605
-
$ 503,339
-
$ 943,143
-
N/A
52,625
$ 1,259
-
$ 399,945
-
$ 12,449,203
-
$ 143,347
-
N/A
2,785,034
Agency
2008 Meas A LSR
Allocation
'.'
1989 MOE
Base Year
Cathedral City
$ 1,439,622
,$ 625,230
Coachella
$ 535,351
$ 69,663
Desert Hot Spr
$ 387,365
;
$ 57,586
Indian Wells
$ 228,694
' ',
ytit
$ 55,962
Indio
$ 1,543,704
$ 465,763
Palm Desert
$ 2,408,250
,,
''
$ 904,798
Palm Springs
$ 1,707,300
$ 1,892,584
Rancho Mirage
$ 888,711
"'
$ 1,191,036
Palo Verde Valley
Blythe
$ 756,219
$ 475,677
AGENDA ITEM 8
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 8.
AGENDA ITEM 9
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 9.
AGENDA ITEM 10
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
DATE:
June 15, 2009
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Staff Analyst
Andrea Zureick, Senior Staff Analyst
THROUGH:
Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager
SUBJECT:
2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
2008 RTIP
Since approval of the 2008 RTIP (short-range transportation program) in November
2008, SCAG has processed seventeen amendments. The attached table reflects the
status of the 2008 RTIP Amendments. Also included is a listing of projects submitted to
SCAG for inclusion in the 2008 RTIP Amendment No's 1-17.
2008 RTP
SCAG is intending to initiate Amendment 2 to the 2008 RTP (long-range transportation
plan) in the coming months. RCTC has tentatively established June 26th as the due date
for RTP project amendment requests in anticipation of a July due date to SCAG. This is
the opportunity to add new projects to the RTP or make changes to scope, schedule,
and cost to both RTP and RTIP modeled projects, so special attention should be paid to
projects that may be going through the PSR or environmental process in the next year,
projects that are experiencing schedule delays and will need to be moved out, or
projects that may have recently been awarded state or federal funds that are not already
in the RTP/RTIP. The RTP and RTIP can become real sticking points for delivery, so this
is an important effort.
Please pay particular attention to:
1) RTP and RTIP Projects that will require PSR approval, federal sign -off of an
environmental document, or federal funding - The project description, total project cost,
and the current schedule must be shown correctly in the RTP and RTIP before PSR and
environmental sign -offs and before obligation of federal funds.
2) Completion Dates - A project completion date (open to traffic date) cannot be moved
past the model year without an RTP amendment. Completion dates would typically be
verified before approval of the environmental document and during programming of the
construction funding.
The model years for the 2008 RTP are:
2008 2009 2010 2012 2014 2020 2030 2035
For example, if a project completion date needs to be changed from 2010 to 2011 in
the RTIP, an RTP amendment is required to move the project from the 2010 to the 2012
modeling year before that change can be made. This only applies to modeled projects
and is based on calendar year.
3) Capacity enhancing or regionally significant projects that need to be added to the
RTP or RTIP - These projects must be listed in the RTP before they can be added to the
RTIP. The following types of facilities are considered regionally significant and should be
included in the RTP:
- Freeways
- State Highways
- Principle Arterial (8-lane arterial)
- Major Arterial (6-lane arterial)
- Major Access Routes
- Goods Movement Routes
- Intermodal Transfer Facilities
Fixed Transit Routes
SCAG expects the amendment process to be complete six to eight months after the
amendment is submitted to SCAG.
2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program — Amendment Submittals & Approval Dates
2008 RTIP
Document
Purpose
Due to RCTC
Due to SCAG
Approved by
SCAG
Approved by
CT/FHWA
Final
7/14/2008
11/17/2008
Amendment 1
Consistency with 2008
RTP Amendment 1 — 50
projects submitted
7/18/2008
7/30/2008
12/8/2008
1/14/2009
Amendment 2
Formal Amendment —
90 projects submitted
9/23/2008
10/22/2008
12/30/2008
2/2/2009
Amendment 3
-- Did not include Riverside County projects --
Amendment 4
Administrative
Modification — 2 projects
submitted
12/8/2008
1/12/2009
1/28/2009
1/29/2009
Amendment 5
-- Economic Stimulus Revenue Amendment — Did not include projects --
Amendment 6
Formal Amendment—
15 projects submitted
01/26/2009
02/02/2009
02/24/2009
03/25/2009
Amendment 7
-- Did not include Riverside County projects --
Amendment 8
-- Did not include Riverside County projects --
Amendment 9
Formal Amendment —
43 projects submitted
02/23/2009
03/04/2009
04/03/2009
04/23/2009
Amendment 10
Administrative
Modification — 7 ARRA
projects submitted
03/11/2009
03/13/2009
03/18/2009
03/18/2009
Amendment 11 -- Did not include Riverside County projects --
Amendment 12
Formal Amendment —
14 ARRA transit projects
03/11/2009
03/20/2009
04/20/2009
04/30/2009
Amendment 13
Administrative
Modification — 1 project
04/01/2009
04/03/2009
04/08/2009
04/08/2009
600Z/80/90
600Z/90/90
600Z/ZZ/90
600Z/8Z/170
spafoad
£ 1. — uopoWpolN
angea}siuiwpy
Li. }uawpuewy
6uipued
6uipued
600Z/1.1/90
600Z/8Z/170
s�oafoad £5
— Tuawpuawy lewaod
91. luawpuewy
-- speroad Alunoo apisJeAN apnloui Tou pia --
squaw}snipe yy�ly
— wewpuewy lewaod
91. }uawpuawy
600Z/ZZ/17
600Z/ZZ/170
600Z/51-/t70
600Z/t71/170
speraad
y?:12:1y 9 — uopoiApolAl
ann.agsiuiwpy
171, wewpuewy
dMHd/1.0
Aq panoaddy
J`dOS
Aci panoaddd
o an
ovos } a
o
am 1 and
asodand
�uawnooa
dlill 800Z
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO. 1
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency
Banning
Calimesa
Cathedral City
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Palm Desert
Calimesa
Calimesa
Beaumont
Caltrans
Riverside County
Riverside County
Caltrans
Palm Desert
Coachella
RCTC
Murrieta
Lake Elsinore
Lake Elsinore
Project ID
RIV060124
RIV060102
RIV011212
RIV041044
RIV041045
RIV071240
RIV080905
RIV080906
RIV080907
RIV080908
RIV080909
RIV080910
RIV080911
RIV080912
RIV080913
RIV080914
RIV080915
RIV080916
RIV080917
RIV080918
RIV071248
RIV060117
RIV060116
RIV060115
RIV010210
45580
45590
45600
RIV031209
RIV030901
RIV071267
RIV080901
RIV010206
RIV060109
Title
Approval Date: 1/14/09
Sunset Ave Grade Separation
County Line Widening
Ramon Rd. Widening (Date Palm Dr. to Da Vali)
Perris Blvd. Widening (PVSD Lat. B to Cactus)
Perris Blvd. Widening (Ironwood to Manzanita)
EB Cactus Ave. Widening (Veterans Way to Heacock)
Alessandro Blvd. Widening (Old 215 to Frederick)
Alessandro Blvd. Widening (500' E & W of Kitching)
Alessandro Blvd.. (Nason to Gilman Springs Rd.)
Gilman Springs Widening (SR60 to Alessandro)
Gilman Springs Widening (Alessandro to Bridge)
Heacock St. Widening (Cactus to San Michele Rd.)
Heacock St. Widening (San Michele Rd. to Oleander)
Box Springs Rd. Widening (500' W/Clark & Day St.)
Ironwood Widening (Day to Barclay)
Ironwood Ave. Widening (Heacock St. to Perris Blvd)
Ironwood Ave. Widening (Perris Blvd. to Nason St.)
Laselle St. Widening - JFK to Alessandro Blvd)
Moreno Beach Dr. Widening (Cactus to Auto Mall)
Redlands Blvd. Widening (SR60 to Cactus Ave)
Monterey Ave. & Fred Waring Dr. Channelization Improvements
1-10/Singleton Rd. IC
I-10/Cherry Valley Blvd. IC
I-10/Oak Valley Parkway IC
I-10/Morongo Parkway IC
I-10/Gene Autry Tr/Palm Dr. IC
1-10 at Date Palm Dr. IC
I-10/Bob Hope Dr. IC
I-10/Portola Ave. IC
I-10/McNaughton Pkwy IC
1-15 - SBD Co Line to Jct I-15/1-215 - HOT Lns
I-15/Murrieta Hot Springs Rd IC
I-15/Railroad Canyon Rd. IC & I-15/Franklin St.
I-15/SR74 IC
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO. 1
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency Project ID
Corona RIV010208 I-15/Cajalco Rd. IC
Moreno Valley RIV041052 SR60/Nason St. IC + Moreno Beach Dr. IC
Moreno Valley 32300 SR60/Nason St. IC
Moreno Valley RIV080902 SR60/Redlands Blvd. IC
Moreno Valley RIV080904 SR60/Theodore St. IC
Moreno Valley RIV080903 SR60/Gilman Springs Rd. IC
Riverside County 46460 SR79 Widening (2-4) - Thompson to Domenigoni Pkwy
Caltrans RIV060101 SR86/Airport Blvd. IC
Coachella RIV061159 SR86/Avenue 50 IC
RCTC RIV071250 SR91/115Improvements
RCTC RIV070308 SR91/71 Jct - Replace EB 91 to NB 71 connector W/Flyover connector
RCTC RIV070309 1-215 Widening - Scott to Nuevo Rd. IC (2-3 lanes ea. Dir)
Riverside County RIV050534 I-215/Newport Rd. IC
RCTC RIV071276 1-215 Nuevo Rd to Box Springs Rd. - Construct 2 HOV lanes
Riverside County RIV060120 I-215/Van Buren Blvd. IC Widening (2-4 lanes)
Moreno Valley RIV050533 I-215/Cactus Ave. IC Widening (3-6 lanes)
Title
Approval Date: 1/14/09
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO.2
Riverside County Transportation Commission
esu
Riverside County Tronsporiolion Commission
Agency
Beaumont
Cities & County
Cities & County
Cities & County
Corona
Corona
Indio
La Quinta
Moreno Valley
Palm Desert
Palm Desert
Riverside County
Riverside County
Riverside County
Riverside County
Riverside County
Riverside County
RCTC
RCTC
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
Temecula
Palm Springs
Palm Desert
Indio
Temecula
Temecula
Murrieta
RCTC
Project ID
RIV070301
RIV031223
RIV070710
RIV52001
RIV010209
RIV011241
RIV071238
RIV071268
RIV011210
RIV071255
RIV071262
RIV031226
RIV060123
RIV071259
RIV071278
RIV071285
RIV071288
RIV041047
RIV061162
RIV070703
RIV071269
RIV071271
RIV071272
RIV071280
RIV071281
RIV071282
RIV990703
RIV080601
RIV031216
RIV62036
RIV031208
47520
RIV62031
RIV031215
RIV010204
46360
Title
Oak Valley Park @ Noble Creek - Bridge Replacement
STPL Lump Sum Listing for Riverside County
HSIP - Riverside County Lump Sum Projects
STPL Lump Sum Listing for Riverside County
Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension
Auto Center Dr. Grade Separation
Ave. 48 Traffic Signal Interconnect & Traffic Signal Installation
Hwy 111 Signal Interconnect
Reche Vista Dr. Realignment
Mid Valley Bike Path
Hwy 111 Improvements (Northern CL to Larkspur Ln)
De Frain Blvd. Reconstruction & Channelization Improvements
Clay St. Grade Separation
Mecca Community Roundabout
Magnolia Ave. Grade Separation
Ave. 56 Grade Separation
Ave. 66 Grade Separation
STIP-TE Riverside County Lump Sum Projects
UCR Intellishare System
Iowa Ave. Grade Separation
Third Street Grade Separation
Streeter Ave. Grade Separation
Riverside Ave. Grade Separation
Mary Street Grade Separation
Magnolia Ave. Grade Separation
Columbia Ave. Grade Separation
Jurupa Ave. Grade Separation
Estudillo Mansion Heritage Park
Rancho California Rd. Pavement Rehab
1-10/Indian Cyn Dr. IC
I-10/Monterey Ave. IC
1-10/Jefferson St. IC
I-15/SR 79 So. IC
French Valley Pkwy IC/Arterial Phases
I-15/California Oaks Rd/Kalmia St. IC
SR60 from Rt. 215 to Redlands Blvd - Add 2 HOV Lns
Approval Date: 2/2/09
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO. 2
Riverside County Transportation Commission
MEWMei*
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency
Moreno Valley
Beaumont
RCTC
Riverside County
Caltrans
RCTC
Murrieta
Murrieta
RCTC
RCTC
Caltrans
Caltrans
Caltrans
Caltrans
Caltrans
RCTC
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
Project ID
RIV071242
RIV050535
RIV62024
RIV071279
RIV050102
RIV010212
RIV071277
RIV010203
RIV050501
RIV050555
RIVLS01
RIVLS08
RIVLS10
RIVLS02
RIVLS06
RIV520109
RIV031207
RIV041029
RIV050553
RIV061124
RIV071201
RIV071202
RIV071206
RIV071211
R IV071219
RIV071233
RIV071284
RIV071286
RIV071287
RIV080602
RIV080603
RIV080604
RIV080927
RIV080928
RIV080929
RIV990902
Title
Indian St. X-ing Reconstruction
SR60/1-10 - Potrero Blvd. IC
SR79 Realignment (Domenigoni Pkwy to Gilman Springs Rd)
SR86/SR195 (66th Ave) - New IC
Green River Rd. Landscape Enhancements
SR91 - Adams to 60/215 IC - Add HOV Lns
1-215 @ Los Alamos Rd. IC - Landscape Improvements
I-215/Clinton Keith Rd. IC
1-215 @ SR74/G St. IC
1-215 & SR60 - Jct Reconstruction to provide 2 HOV Direct. connector Lns.
SHOPP - Collision Reduction Projects Lump Sum
Minor Projects Lump Sum
SHOPP - Mobility Projects Lump Sum
SHOPP - Roadway Preservation Projects Lump Sum
SHOPP - Bridge Preservation Projects Lump Sum
San Jacinto Branch Line for Rail Passenger Service
Corona Transit Center @ 31 E. Grand Blvd.
Riverside Transit Center - Downtown Metrolink Station
Temecula Transit Center @ 27199 Jefferson Ave.
Operating Assistance - FY 07/08
Operating Assistance - FY 08/09
Capitalized Preventative Maintenance - FY 2008/2009
Replacement Support Vehicles
Capitalized Cost of Tire Lease - FY 2008/2009
Debt Financing - FY 2008/2009
Purchase one replacement full size bus for the City of Calexico
Operating Assistance - FY 2005/2007 (Carry over into the 2008 RTIP)
Operating Assistance for the Hemet Opportunity Project Express
Capitalized cost of Mobility Management for the Hemet Opportunity Project Express
Purchase 8 Type VII, 26 passenger mid -size vehicles for Routes 212 & 214
Purchase 6 40-ft. CNG replacement buses for the Express/BRT Service
Purchase 10 - 40 ft. CNG Expansion buses to implement Express and/or BRT Svc
Maintenance Facility Upgrades - Hemet & Riverside
Upgrade and replace Oracle Servers & Implement data center server virtualization syst
Purchase 9 - 40 Ft. CNG Expansion buses to implement express and/or BRT service
Perris Multi -Modal Transit Facility
Approval Date: 2/2/09
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO. 2
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency
Riverside
Riverside
Riverside
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Project ID
RIV080922
RIV080925
RIV080926
RIV061154
RIV071225
RIV071226
RIV071227
RIV071228
IRV071229
RIV071230
RIV071232
RIV071264
RIV071265
RIV071283
RIV080919
RIV080920
RIV080921
RIV080923
Title
Purchase replacement office & misc. equipment
Purchase communication equipment for drivers and dispatchers
Construct fleet bay for paratransit vehicles
Operating Assistance - FY 2007/2008
Purchase 11 expansion buses
Purchase 7 replacement Alt -Fuel, CNG, Non -revenue support vehicles
Purchase 3 expansion Alt -Fuel, CNG, Non -revenue support vehicles
Purchase 7 Expansion paratransit DAR buses
Purchase transit enhancement bus stop amenities
Purchase computer & office equipment
Facility Improvements
CNG buses for the Fred Waring Express Bus Service
Low floor CNG buses for new service from Mecca to Indio
Operating Assistance to provide community based flex route in Desert Hot Springs
Fuel Cell bus research & demonstration project to develop Zero Emission bus
Purchase 1-CNG 40 FT. bus
Purchase of ITS Equipment
Operating Assistance - Fixed route & DAR - FY 2008/2009
Approval Date: 2/2/09
600Z/6Z/10 :alea lenoaddy
uoRaiedes °pale .any envoi
uoRaiedes °pale Jewao oIny
al4ll
£OLOLOAPLI
1.17ZI. !MAN
al Pafoud
episiani�
euaoo
AouaBy
uopspwo) uoi}opodsuoil huno) appian%
uolsgwwoo uogepodsueil /(}unoo aplsaanw
'VON 1N3WaN3W`d - d1121 800Z
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO.6
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency
Project ID
CVAG RIV090102
Desert Hot Spring: RIV050304
Desert Hot Spring: RIV061161
Riverside
Riverside
Banning
Banning
Caltrans
RTA
RTA
RTA
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
RIV090101
RIV090110
RIV060112
RIV060124
RIV031225
RIV090104
RIV090105
RIV090106
RIV090103
RIV090107
RIV090108
RIV090109
Title
Approval Date: 03/25/2009
Clean Vehicle - Alternative fuel sweepers for regional street sweeping program
Essential Road Improvement - Ph 1
Essential Road Improvement - Ph III
Victoria Ave. Utility Undergrounding (Washington Ave. to Maude St.)
Victoria Ave. Parkway Restoration (Harrison to Adams/Auto Center Dr.)
I-10/Sunset Ave. UC
Sunset Ave. S/O 1-10 IC - Construct new 4 Ln UC GS @ UPRR & minor widening
SR71 & SR91 - Conduct wildlife movement study for mitigation commitment
JARC Operating Assistance - Commuter Link - Routes 212 & 214
JARC & NF Projects Lump sum for Non -Profit Organizations
JARC - Extended late night service program (FY 2008/2009)
JARC Operating Assistance - Extended night/guaranteed service program (FY 2008/2009)
JARC & NF Projects Lump sum for Non -Profit Organizations
NF - Operating Assistance to fund TRIP Program (FY 2008/2009)
JARC - Rideshare Program (FY 2008/2009)
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO.9
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency
Cathedral City
FLH
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Project ID
RIV011212
RIV090118
RIV080905
RIV080907
RIV080908
RIV080909
RIV080914
RIV080916
RIV080918
Palm Desert RIV071248
Palm Springs RIV060110
Palm Springs RIV070306
Riverside County RIV071259
Riverside County RIV071260
Riverside
Riverside
Corona
Corona
RCTC
RCTC
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RIV071269
RIV071272
RIV061103
RIV061104
RIV090111
RIV090112
RIV041014
RIV041030
RIV061112
RIV061119
RIV061123
RIV061124
RIV061125
RIV061126
Title
Approval Date: 04/23/2009
Ramon Rd. - Date Palm Dr. to Davall Widening (4 - 6 lanes)
In Joshua Tree National Park on Park Rte 11 (Gold Pt to Sand Hill) Widening & Realig.
Alessandro Blvd. Widening (Old 215 to Frederick St.)
Alessandro Blvd. Widening (Nason St. to Gilman Springs Rd)
Gilman Springs Rd. Widening (SR60 to Alessandro)
Gilman Springs Rd. (Alessandro to Bridge)
Ironwood Ave. Widening (Heacock St. to Perris Blvd)
Lasselle St. Widening (JFK to Alessandro)
Redlands Blvd. Widening (SR to Cactus Ave.)
Monterey Ave. & Fred Waring Dr. - Channelization Improvements
S. Palm Canon Dr. Widening (Murray Canyon Rd. to Bogert Tr.)
San Lorenzo Rd. Shoulder Paving
Mecca Community Roundabout
Ave. 66 and Harrison Ave. Traffic sitnal installation
Third Street Grade Separation
Riverside Ave Grade Separation
Capitalized Preventative Maintenance - FY 2008/2009
Purchase 5 replacement DAR gas/diesel buses
Purchase 1 replacement modified van for Peppermint Ridge
Purchase two expansion vehicles for Mt. Shadows
Purchase route scheduling/runcutting system & software
Hemet Transit Center
Capital maintenance spares - 5307 FY 2006/2007
Lease cost of automatic passenger counter (5307 - FY 2006/2007)
Upgrade rural area bus stops
Operating Assistance - 5307 FY 2007/2008
Capitalized Preventative maintenance - 5307 FY 2007/2008
Purchase one replacement full-sized bus for the City of Calexico
Agency
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
Sunline Transit
Lake Elsinore
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Blythe
RCTC
Caltrans
Caltrans
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO.9
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Project ID
RIV061128
RIV061132
RIV061134
RIV071201
RIV071202
RIV080923
RIV060109
RIV090117
32300
RIV041052
RIV080904
RIV031222
RIV050555
RIVLS08
RIVLS01
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Title Approval Date: 04/23/2009
Purchase one replacement full-sized bus for the City of Calexico
Capital Maintenance Spares - 5307 - FY 2004/2005
Purchase new coin counting machine for Riverside facility - 5307 FY 2007/2008
Operating Assistance - 5307 FY 2008/2009
Capitalized Preventative Maintenance - 5307 - FY 2008/2009
Operating Assistance - 5311 FY 2008/2009
I-15/SR74 IC Jct Improvements
Sr60/Nason St. IC Improvements
SR60/Nason St. IC Reconstruction
SR60/Nason St. IC + Moreno Beach Dr. IC Improvements
SR60/Theodore St. IC Imrpovements
U.S. 95/Intake Blvd. Widening (Hobson Way to 14th St.)
1-215 & SR 60 Reconstruction of Jct to provide 2 HOV direct connector lanes
Minor Projects Lump Sum listing
SHOPP - Collission Reduction Projets Lump Sum Listing
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO.10
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency
Riverside Co.
Riverside Co.
Riverside Co.
Riverside
Murrieta
Ca[trans
Sunline Transit
Project ID
45580
45600
RIV990701
RIV0084
RIV010203
RIVLS02
RIV080921
Title
Approval Date: 03/18/2009
I-10/Gene Autry Tr./Palm Dr. IC
I-10/Bob Hope Dr. Extension
SR60/Valley Way IC
SR91 @ Van Buren Blvd. IC
I-215/Clinton Keith IC
SHOPP - Roadway Preservation Projects Lump Sum
Purchase of ITS Equipment
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO.12
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Eon
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency
Corona
Corona
RCTC
RCTC
RCTC
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
Riverside
Riverside
Sunline Transit
Sunline Transit
Project ID
RIV090119
RIV090120
RIV090301
RIV090302
RIV090303
RIV090123
RIV090124
RIV090125
RIV090126
RIV090127
RIV090121
RIV090122
RIV071229
RIV071232
Title
Approval Date: 04/30/2009
Purchase 4 replacement Type II CNG DAR buses
Purchase bus stop shelters & bus stop amenities
Metrolink Positive Train Control
SCRRA Rehab & Renovation of Metrolink Rail
SCRRA Central Maintenance Facility & Keller St. Yard Maintenance Facility
Capitalized Preventative Maintenance - ARRA 5307 & ARRA 5311
ADA Operating Assistance - ARRA 5307 & ARRA 5311
Capital cost of contracting - ARRA 5307
Debt Financing for 55 CNG Replacement 40-ft buses purchased in 2001- ARRA 5307
Bus Stop Amenities - ARRA 5307 & ARRA 5311
Purchase farebox system - ARRA 5307
Purchase equipment to support the CNG Maintenance Facility - ARRA 5307
Purchase transit enhancements & bus stop amenities - ARRA 5307
Facility Improvements - ARRA 5307
600Z/80/170 :oleo !enoiddY
uo!;eiedag wale .JQ �awoo olny 617Z 6 60n121 euoao0
al;!1 Q!;oafoid /taue6d
uoisgwwo) uogouodsunil *nod appm/ a
uo!ss!uauaoo uogepodsuau filunoO ap!saan!N
£6'ON 1N3WaN3INV - &Di 800Z
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO.14
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency
RCTC
Riverside Co.
Riverside Co.
Riverside Co.
Riverside
Murrieta
Caltrans
Project ID
RIV041047
45580
45600
RIV990701
RIV0084
RIV010203
RIVLS06
Title
STIP-TE Project Lump Sum
I-10/Gene Autry Tr./Palm Dr. IC
I-10/Bob Hope Dr. Extension
SR60/Valley Way IC
SR91 @ Van Buren Blvd. IC
I-215/Clinton Keith IC
SHOPP - Bridge Preservation Projects LS
Approval Date: April 22, 2009
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO.16
Riverside County Transportation Commission
..................... . .
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency
Corona
Corona
Corona.
Corona
Project ID
RIV010209
RIV010227
RIV011240
RIV060108
Palm Springs RIV031206
Palm Springs RIV090401
Palm Springs RIV090402
Palm Springs RIV090405
Palm Springs RIV090406
Riverside Co. RIV010205
RCTC RIV050301
Riverside RIV071270
Lake Elsinore RIV010206
Lake Elsinore RIV060109
Corona RIV010208
Beaumont RIV050535
Coachella RIV071246
Caltrans RIVLS10
Caltrans RIVLS12
RCTC RIV090113
RCTC RIV090114
RCTC RIV090115
Title
Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension
ATMS
McKinley St. GS
N. Main St. - Add NB dedicated Rt. Turn Lane
S. Palm Canyon Dr. over Arenas Cyn So.
Drainage Channel
Agua Caliente Cultural Museum Roadway Imp.
Road and Signage Improvement (PE)
Vista Chino at Whitewater River bridge
replacement
Ramon Rd. widening (4 to 6 lens) from Landau
Blvd. to San Luis Rey Dr.
Scott Rd. widening near Murrieta
CATNAP - Riverside to Orange County Corridor
Mary Street GS
I-15/Railroad Cyn Rd. IC & I-15/Franklin St. IC
I-15/SR-74 (Central Ave) IC Jct. modification
I-15/Cajalco Rd. IC
Construction of new 6 through lane Potrero Blvd
IC
Ave. 52 GS
SHOPP - Mobility Projects LS
SHOPP - Emergency Response Project LS
Purchase one replacement bus for Desert Arc
Purchase one replacement small bus for Care -A -
Van Transit, Inc.
Purchase computer hardware for GPS system
for Angel View Crippled Children's Foundation
Approval Date:
Change Requested
Schedule delay
Cost increase
Minor cost decrease & schedule delay
Schedule delay due to funding availability
Project description changed to
correctly reflect the planned
improvements
New Project
New Project
New Project
New Project
Project Deletion
Cost decrease and schedule delay
Project Deletion - Duplicate Project
Cost increase
Funding redistribution town phases
Schedule delay
Reprogramming of funding years
Cost increase
Cost increase
New Project
New project funded by FTA 5310
New project funded by FTA 5310
New project funded by FTA 5310
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO.16
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Riverside County Transportation Commission
RCTC RIV090115
RCTC RIV520109
SunLine Transit Agency 62126
SunLine Transit Agency RIV010502
SunLine Transit Agency RIV041037
SunLine Transit Agency RIV041040
SunLine Transit Agency RIV041048
SunLine Transit Agency RIV050546
SunLine Transit Agency RIV050547
SunLine Transit Agency RIV050548
SunLine Transit Agency RIV050550
SunLine Transit Agency RIV060201
SunLine Transit Agency RIV061148
SunLine Transit Agency RIV061151
SunLine Transit Agency RIV061152
SunLine Transit Agency RIV070711
SunLine Transit Agency RIV071225
SunLine Transit Agency RIV071226
SunLine Transit Agency RIV071227
SunLine Transit Agency RIV071228
SunLine Transit Agency RIV071230
SunLine Transit Agency RIV071231
SunLine Transit Agency RIV080920
SunLine Transit Agency RIV090403
SunLine Transit Agency RIV090404
SunLine Transit Agency RIV090407
SunLine Transit Agency RIV32254
SunLine Transit Agency RIV32255
Purchase one replacement large bus for Care
Connexxus, Inc.
Perris Valley Line
Replacement of seven CNG 40" buses
Property acquisition of approx. 2.27 acres for bus
parking/maintenance facility expansion
Debt financing (FY 04/05)
Purchase of vehicle maintenance equipment
Purchase ten replacement buses
Purchase sixteen replacement buses
Purchase transit enhancements
Purchase nine replacement DAR vans
Capitalized preventative maintenance
Upgrade & modernize hydrogen fuel reformer
Purchase one replacement medium bus
Purchase ten replacement buses
Purchase transit enhancements
Purchase two expansion DAR buses
Purchase eleven expansion buses
Purchase seven non -revenue support vehicles
Purchase three expansion non -revenue support
vehicles
Purchase two expansion DAR buses
Purchase computer & office equipment
Purchase replacement maintenance tools
Purchase one expansion bus
CNG Fueling Station Improvements
Rehabilitation of SunLine's Fleet older buses
Purchase one bus for fixed route
Facility improvements
Purchase computer & office equipment
New project funded by FTA 5310
Cost increase
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Project completion
Cost decrease
Project deletion
Project deletion
Description change
Project deletion
Project deletion
Description change
New project
New project
New project
Project completion
Project completion
Approval Date:
:wea lenoaddd
uopidwoo Toefoad saloiyan ipuagaied wawaoeldai Z aseyoand OZVZEAI I Aoua6y ▪ aununs
uol;aldwoo pefad 170/M0Z Z417ZEnl l itoua6y ▪ aununs
- EO/ZOOZ Ad) sayoeoo Joiow aseyoand/eseai
uogaldwoo pafoad sepNen anuenai-uou waumeldai aulu aseyoand L9ZZCAI I Aoua6y pm' aununS
uoisquiwoo uonepodsueal kunoo apisaanw
9VON 1N3WdN3Wd- dllt1 800Z
2008 RTIP - AMENDMENT NO.17
Riverside County Transportation Commission
.......... ...... _
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Agency
Cities & Counties
Corona
Corona
Palm Desert
RCTC
Riverside
Riverside
CALTRANS
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
SunLine
Project ID
RIV031223
RIV011241
RIV031203
RIV071255
RIV041047
RIV071282
RIV0084
RIVLS02
RIV090106
RIV090124
RIV090125
RIV090126
RIV090127
RIV080923
Title
STPL LS - Pavement Rehab
Auto Center Dr. GS
Magnolia Ave. Corridor
Mid Valley Bike Path
Transportation Enhancement - LS
Columbia Ave. GS
SR91 @ Van Buren Blvd. IC
SHOPP - Roadway Preservation LS
JARC - Extended Service Program
ADA Operating Assistance - FY 10
Capital Cost of Contracting
Debt Financing - FY 10
Bus Stop Amenities - FY 10
Fixed Route & DAR Operating Assistance.
Approval Date:
Change Requested
Cost/funding increase
Reprogramming of funding yrs for the construction phase
Reprogramming of funding yrs for all project phases
Reprogramming of funding yrs for engineering
Cost/funding increase to include the ARRA-State TE
Reprogramming of funds
STPL funding reduced to match fed. Fund availability
ARRA-SH & TPC funding adjustments
Project description change
ARRA-FTA 5307 funding decrease
ARRA-FTA 5307 funding increase
ARRA-FTA 5307 funding increase
ARRA-FTA 5307 funding increase
Funding Decrease
6/8/2009
AGENDA ITEM 11
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 11.
AGENDA ITEM 12
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 12.
... AGENCY I TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE BANNING I DUANE BURK ] Kahono Oei Director of Public Works BEAUMONT ]KISHEN PRATHIVADI Assistant Director of Public ·Works Dee Moorjani TECHNICAL AD .. RY COMMITTEE JuneT,2009 PRINT NAME ~<L 1 ~ c,......1 \ L.\....oj' fu<t. ~~O OEJ BLYTHE Kevin Nelson -0 A I J Assistant Public Works J ' 11"'1 r"tOt! r f"i·r JIM RODKEY Public Works Director Director . CVAG !ALLYN WAGGLE Mike Shoberg /11; /lu 51...ok CALIMESA CAL TRANS CARLOS ZAMANO City Engineer PATRICK HALLY CANYON LAKE I HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer CATHEDRAL ]BILL BAYNE CITY COACHELLA PAUL TOOR Public Works Director Bob French Public Works Director Bill Mosby Pavel Horn Tony Lucero CORONA KIP FIELD I Bob Morin Acting Public Works Director Principal Civil Engineer DESERT HOT I JONATHAN HOY SPRINGS Public Works Director /City Engineer {!,('J,y( 0) ~fl.. ~/[fl ftt.rAK/1 /-IA l L. r ar: s Sw."2 f;w~ ~ 'lb fa /v1 ()Tl-J~ • u f,,u~~// L.u 6/10/2009
" " A G E N C Y I T A C M E M B E R A L T E R N A T E H E M E T M I K E G O W V i c t o r M o n z P r i n c i p a l E n g i n e e r I N D I A N W E L L S ! T I M W A S S I L B o n d i e B a k e r A s s i s t a n t E n g i n e e r I I I N D I O L A Q U I N T A L A K E E L S I N O R E M O R E N O V A L L E Y M U R R I E T A N O R C O P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r / C i t y E n g i n e e r J I M S M I T H I T o m R a f f e r t y D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s P r i n c i p a l C i v i l E n g i n e e r T I M O T H Y J O N A S S O N I N i c k N i c k e r s o n P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r / C i t y E n g i n e e r K E N S E U M A L O C i t y E n g i n e e r E d B a s u b a s C i t y T r a f f i c E n g i n e e r C H R I S V O G T P r e m K u m a r P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r / C i t y D e p u t y P u b l i c W o r k s E n g i n e e r D i r e c t o r / A s s i s t a n t C i t y E n g i n e e r P A T R I C K T H O M A S R u s s N a p i e r D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / C i t y C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t E n g i n e e r P r o g r a m M a n a g e r B I L L T H O M P S O N L o r i A s k e w D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s I A s s o c i a t e E n g i n e e r P A L M D E S E R T I M A R K G R E E N W O O D D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c w o r k s A l a n a T o w n s e n d P A L M S P R I N G S I D A V E B A R A K I A N ! M a r c u s F u l l e r D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / C i t y E n g i n e e r P V V T A T E C H N I C A L A D ~ R Y C O M M I T T E E J u n e T , 2 0 0 9 P R I N T N A M E t \ t t t e . - G o w W r . . . . , s , L . : : : : . . . . T M S r " " \ L - 1 } - . 1 \ ; ' \ A . ' \ j 0 - v . . A . c ; ~ ~ / C . . e N ~ ~ A l o ' R l 0 V \ , K \ . \ , r V l l \ 1 L ~ ~ r ; J . , ~ M O i ) ~ G ~ f q v e l J ~ / 4 4 n " I G N A T U R E - - ~ . " - - - ) , , - - - - . . J e e - ~ d ~ � n ~ 6 / 1 0 / 2 0 0 9
.. • AGENCY I TAC MEMBER PERRIS I HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer RTA MARK STANLEY Director of Planning RANCHO I BRUCE HARRY MIRAGE Director of Public Works RIVERSIDE TOM BOYD Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer RIVERSIDE JUAN PEREZ COUNTY Director of Transportation SAN JACINTO I HABIB MOTLAGH SUN LINE TEMECULA WILDOMAR WR COG <!.llf o F IDts~er ll<J' W6 City Engineer EUNICE LOVI Director of Planning GREG BUTLER Director of Public Works MICHAEL KASHIWAGI Director of Public Works RUTHANNE TAYLOR-BERGER Deputy Executive Director I ALTERNATE I C-k .. i .. -s-.1te. .4~s1. ~"' Scott Richardson Planning and Program Manager I Randy Viegas Project Manager Siobhan Foster Patty Romo Deputy Director of Transportation CJ,e,,· s 5... Assistant Engineer Alfonso Hernandez Assistant Planner Dan York City Engineer Diane Nguyen Transportation Programs Manager V\MI~ t-(. tUoM~~l I I TECHNICAL AD~RY COMMITTEE June , 2009 • PRINT NAME Chn's SWf~ ;J!t.,1-5(¥/A ~~-~ ~lfvl ./""' r~elJ ~.,,._y ~rY\ ~ r---··-.., ·.--,~~ C}1.r1'5 S"~4 ~~ 4/ftJlllftJ JI~ //1 ~/1 J-t '-<d~ ~'t"Le::~ l/;;J.1~ ~HI~ µo~~s:il ~ 6/10/2009
,. AGENCY WI 1.,,i ot+;,._J \)J V..'-b~ f>1e,:[2/fJa VAU~( lJ 1(__{_. o~ ~~~o~S KG1l fb1C, ti/¥ I? c 7 j) l<t10 Cvr;r~~ !II I ''1" KC.TC.. 4'/1'° \ L•,... .--· • --I~ I~" R.CTC TECHNICAL AD\A>RY COMMITTEE June i!, 2009 • NAME TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL ,4-tJN € 8c+MJ @/0 ere__ a se.-\tlne.,~d e_r~ w l\ lc{Q..Vt .Cc>lA. -·~ ~~+~c.. \,__e v.J 1..'-'~, c...o ""l ~'~"~ \.A.tT6uµ ....... t;: p 'j . .:.-·I C1 /_E,k:/ s f: tz1er1-£ ~:" l'll z:~·VA L , u ~6i ;J~ ~ef~,·vL~ .. }tvtiAo@V\)QLT:>(.1.r0?t ,/!Al v ~ ~~~-"f lb-.U~fZO A--~iFi-• 'f 16c.J~14 e.,. p .IStF-S ii "45, C...C --1. ~ F~c)--CJ 1.o e c h + eA-(£ r c .l-z... ~J tJ~(];IM"b ;~ V\llduv'b>n@ rc:f-~.orc.-; 8'-e r yYJ a "" }13.5 m <J..L j<Ml /JJQ.45MQ.C; ~ ref(,,.,,, e.._,. O'J ;::t11·1;11, ;t/1<..T ,, ... ~sJ1. 6''1:f.; r/(hCY<J-Sl1 I} f<cTl/f/111 • OYJ-_JL.euti-vTttf~ ~GJ-"'r ~J•r""I°' ~~ plllli Cu~NIP tJClBftlto~ rctc.o~ c\..,\~" cU..\\(_ \Jf\Q.Cl/\f\. 1 s~u-\~\JA~tf\. ~~c.., o\<..9 I I 6/10/2009
-· AGENCY !Zele 9~ ,.) /'Z:,7c TECHNICAL AD\A>RY COMMITTEE June 'TS, 2009 • NAME TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL A~/Y71 H~-k'-> Lj51 -7g-;2--'?!'ii ai~V'G~v~ Dvj ~~ / ~;) J'~ r ~\\7) w (/ ~d{~h~# ~S-A~/Z-~~/ 6/10/2009