Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout19891108 - Agenda Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 89-28 Meeting 89-28 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT OLD MILL OFFICE CENTER,BUILDING C,SUITE 135 201 SAN ANTONIO CIRCLE,MOUNTAIN VIEW,CALIFORNIA 94040 (415)949-5500 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7 : 30 P.M. 201 San Antonio Circle Wednesday Suite C-135 November 8 , 1989 Mountain View, CA (7 : 30) * ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES (October 25, 1989) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -- Public** ADOPTION OF AGENDA BOARD BUSINESS (7 :45) 1 . Adoption of Employer-Employee Relations Resolution -- J. Fiddes Resolution Adopting Employer-Employee Relations Resolution (8 :05) 2. Review of the Structures and Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Use & Management Plan for Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve -- D. Hansen (8 :45) 3 . Proposed Addition of Smith Property to Mt. Melville Area of Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve -- D. Hansen Resolution Accepting Purchase Agreement and Authorizing Officer to Execute Acceptance of Grant to District, and Authorizing General Manager to Execute All Documents Necessary to Closing of Transaction (9:00) 4 . Approval of Equipment Mechanic-Operator Job Classification, Job Specification, Salary Range, and Filling of One Position -- D. Hansen (9:10) 5. Property Tax Allocation From Proposed Redwood City Redevelopment Project -- C. Britton Resolution Electing to Receive Property Tax Revenues (9: 15) 6 . Proposed Addition to Rules of Procedure to Enable General Manager to Accept the Acquisition of Minor Interests in and Easements Upon Land -- C. Britton Resolution Amending Rules of Procedure Herbert Grench,General Manager,Board of Directors:Katherine Duffy,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Edward Shelley,Nonette Hanko,Gerry Andean,Richard Bishop (9: 25) 7 . Rescheduling of November 22, 1989 Regular Meeting to November 29 , 1989 C. Britton (9: 30) INFORMATIONAL REPORTS Directors and Staff CLAIMS CLOSED SESSION (LAND NEGOTIATION MATTERS) ADJOURNMENT *NOTE: Times are estimated and items may appear earlier or later than listed. Agenda is subject to change of order. **TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: When an item you 're concerned with appears on the agenda, the Chair will invite you to address the Board at that time; on other matters you may address the Board under Oral Communications. An alternative is to comment to the Board by a Written Communication, which the Board appreciates. Each speaker will ordinarily be limited to 3 minutes. When recognized, please begin by stating your name and address. We request that you fill out the form provided so that your name and address can be accurately included in the minutes. NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS There will be Special Meetings of the Board of Directors on November 13, 1989 and November 20, 1989 at 7 :30 p.m. at the District Office to interview candidates for the Ward 6 vacancy. Meeting 89-27 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT OLD MILL OFFICE CENTER,BUILDING C,SUITE 135 201 SAN ANTONIO CIRCLE,MOUNTAIN VIEW,CALIFORNIA 94040 (415)949.5500 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS October 25 1989 MINUTES I. ROLL CALL Vice-President Nonette Hanko called the meeting to order at 7 : 33 P.M. Members Present: Katherine Duffy, Robert McKibbin, Teena Henshaw, Edward Shelley, Nonette Hanko, and Richard Bishop. Member Absent: Gerry Andeen Personnel Present: Herbert Grench, Craig Britton, David Hansen, Jean Fiddes, Mary Hale, Del Woods, John Escobar, Carleen Bruins, Stanley Norton, and Cecilia Cyrier. II. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS There were no written communications . III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were no oral communications . IV. ADOPTION OF AGENDA N. Hanko stated that the agenda was adopted by Board consensus . V. BOARD BUSINESS i A. Legislative Program Report by Ralph Heim H. Grench introduced Ralph Heim of SRJ Jackson/Barish, the District ' s legislative consultant in Sacramento. Mr. Heim briefed the Board on the legislative session just ended, including reporting on the two District sponsored bills : SB 1596 to extend the time for audit completion from 90 to 120 days after the end of the fiscal year and AB 2301 pertaining to withholding density credits from dedication. He also reported on what he felt may transpire during the next session of the legislature and its impact on the District and environmental legislation in general. Copies of the 1989-1990 Legislative Program Status Report - April 27 , 1989 were distributed. B. Earthquake Damage Assessment Report and Slide Presentation D. Hansen reported on staff ' s on-site inspection of the District preserves following the October 17 earthquake and showed slides . He said that the preserves in the southern Herbert Grench,General Manager,Board of Directors:Katherine Duffy,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Edward Shelley,Nonette Hanko,Gerry Andean,Richard Bishop Meeting 89-27 Page two portion of the District showed the greatest ground shifting, rock slides, and road, trail, and building damage. He said that the rental structure on the former Logan property in the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve was a total loss and that the chimneys on the ranger residence at Saratoga Gap Open Space Preserve and on the upper house at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve were both extensively damaged. He reported that clean-up was progressing on all .the affected preserves and that, though the District does not carry earthquake insurance, staff will pursue with the District ' s insurance carrier the possibility of a claim. D. Hansen distributed copies of his October 25, 1989 memorandum to H. Grench assessing the earth- quake damage to District lands . VI. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS H. Grench reminded the Board about their staff recognition event on Thursday, October 26; the Pulgas Ridge Open Space Preserve trail dedication on Saturday, October 28 ; and the Saturday, November 4 joint workshop with the Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Commission at Sanborn County Park. He also reported on the National Recreation and Parks Association conference he attended following the Open Space Conference in Albuquerque, New Mexico. John Escobar reported on a fire at Saratoga Gap Open Space Preserve on October 17 just before the earthquake. The staff members who had attended the open space conference in Albuquerque presented brief summaries of the various sessions they had attended. The Board attendees also contributed comments and observations on the sessions they had attended. The Board' s 1990 Open Space Conference Committee scheduled a public meeting for Thursday, November 2 at 7 : 30 P.M. at the District office to review the Albuquerque conference in depth and begin planning for the 1990 conference. VIZ. CLAIMS Motion: T. Henshaw moved that the Board approve Revised Claims 89- 21 of October 25, 1989. R. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0 VIII . CLOSED SESSION S. Norton announced that litigation matters to be discussed in Closed Session fell under Government Code Sections 54956. 9 (a) and involved the Tobar, Ringo, and Dyer matters . The Board recessed to Closed Session on litigation, land acquisition, and personnel matters at 10:32 P.M. IX. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:25 P.M. Cecilia A. Cyrier Secretary R-89-150 (Meeting 89-28 WO November 8 , 1989) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT October 30 , 1989 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager PREPARED BY: J. Fiddes, Administrative Services Manager SUBJECT: Adoption of Employer-Employee Relations Resolution Recommended Action: Adopt the attached Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Adopting Employer - Employee Relations Resolution Discussion: On July 25, 1989, the District received a request for recognition to represent the rangers and open space technicians from Local 715 of the Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO. The District did not have an administrative procedure in place to govern the petition process. I notified Local 715 that, before acting on the petition, the Board of Directors would need to adopt such administrative procedures pursuant to California Government Code Section 3507 . The attached resolution provides orderly procedures for the administration of employer-employee relations between the District and its employee organizations. A draft of this resolution was distributed to all regular District employees and Local 715 for review and comment. No individual employee comments were received. Mr. B. W. (Rusty) Smith, Senior Field Representative, relayed Local 715 ' s five comments-concerns on the draft Employer-Employee Relations Resolution (see attached letter dated October 11, 1989) . To proceed with the consultation process, J. Fiddes and Mr. Richard Bolanos of the Palo Alto law firm of Whitmore, Kay & Stevens met with Mr. Smith to discuss his letter. As a result of their meeting and a subsequent phone conversation with Mr. Smith, no changes were made in the draft resolution based on Mr. Smith' s first and second statements . Based on the third item, Article II, Section 17 , paragraph 3 , sentence 4 was amended to read, "The Board of Directors may, in its discretion, refer the dispute to a third-party hearing process for an advisory decision. " The added language is underscored. No change was made in Section 19 , the focus of the fourth statement. Based on Mr . Smith' s fifth comment-concern, staff agreed to delete article V, Section 23 , subsection C from the resolution. This subsection dealt with employee strikes , sickouts, or other total or partial stoppages or slowdowns of work.Assuming you adopt the attached Employer-Employee Relations Resolution, I will immediately designate J. Fiddes as my duly- authorized representative to serve as the District ' s Employee Relations Officer. 715 1 SERVICE EMPLOYEES LOCAL 715 INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO wo October 11, 1989 Herbert 'Grench, General Manager Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Old Mill Office Center, Bldg. C, Suite 135 201 San Antonio Circle Mountain View, CA 94040 Dear Mr. Grench: Local 715 has five comments/concerns on your draft employer-employee relations resolution. 1. Article II, Section 11, paragraphs three and four. We believe the "shared cost" concept is not standard in such ordinances; however, if employee organizations are to share the cost of the election, they should have the right to request and receive third party supervision. 2. Article II, Section 17, paragraph 3, sentence 3. We believe such disputes should be referred to expert third parties as a matter of course. 3. Article II, Section 17, paragraph 3, sentence 4. This sentence is unclear. Is the third party's decision final and binding or advisory to the Board? We believe it should be final and binding. 4. Section 19, entire. It is our opinion that access to work locations, especially, is a subject of bargaining under the law and should not be the subject of a unilateral resolution. 5. Article V, Section 23, and sub-section "C". Our attorneys inform us that any such clause is no longer valid after the California Supreme Court's decision in the L.A. Sanitation case. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the resolution. I look forward to attending the Board meeting on October 25 for the final adoption of the ordinance. If your staff determines there are to be any revisions in the draft presented for Board consideration, please advise me of those changes before October 25. Sincerely, B.W. (Rusty) SMITH SENIOR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE BWS:rj opeiu29 afl/cio cc: Stewart Weinberg Kristina M. Sermersheim f ileSAN JOSE OFFICE: 180 East Gish Road, Suite B,San Jose, CA 95112 (408)453-1150 REDWOOD CITY OFFICE - 1735 East Bayshore Road,#32A, Redwood City,CA 94064 * (415)368-2859 Z& R-89-151 (Meeting 89-28 November 8 , 1989) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT November 2, 1989 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager, D. Woods , Principal Open Space Planner; S . Marioni , Associate Open Space Planner; C . Bruins , Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Review of the Structures and Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve Recommended Action: Tentatively adopt the structures and improvements element of the Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve as contained in this report . Introduction: The Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve was last reviewed on April 16 , 1986 and the revised plan was adopted on May 14 , 1986 (see report R-86-26 dated April 11, 1986 and memorandum M-86-53 dated May 9 , 1986) . The portion of the structures and improvements element regarding the upper residence was submitted to you on September 24 and October 8 , 1986 (see report R-86-86 dated September 19 , 1986 and report R-86-91 dated September 30 , 1986) . At your October 8 , 1986 meeting, you approved conversion of the upper residence into a duplex that would become a part of the District ' s ranger residency program. The Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve includes the main part of the preserve and the non-contiguous Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area (see Exhibits A and B) . Only the structures and improvements element of the plan is being presented to you at this time. Because of its unusually large scope, this element has been separated from the rest of the plan. The remaining portion of the plan will be presented to you i I R-89-151 Page Two within the nG.-.t few months. Use and Management Plan: The attached chart (Exhibit C) summarizes the existing Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for the structures and improvements element only. It also incorporates new and revised recommendations addressed in this report. The chart indicates the status and anticipated completion of each project, as well as current and projected funding information. A. Structures and Improvements The following discussion pertains to residences , the foothills area field office, Deer Hollow Farm structures , the water system, and restroom facilities . Upper Residence The upper house, located near the end of Mora Drive, is currently being remodelled to provide two living units . You approved this project on October 8 , 1986 (see report R-86-86 dated September 30, 1986) . The report stated that one unit would be occupied by a ranger, and the other unit would be rented by a tenant and would eventually be occupied by a ranger. Until the remodelling started at the end of June 1989, the entire house was rented. The tenant has remained in half of the house during construction. The duplex is expected to be completed in two months. A ranger will move in the south unit immediately upon its completion. The second ranger residence will be occupied soon after the beginning of the next calendar year. The location of the house offers good surveillance of an area extending from the county park all the way to the Black Mountain area of Monte Bello Open Space Preserve. The plan to have two rangers occupying the upper residence has been based on the need to maximize the amount of surveillance and response to on-site problems at the busiest District preserve. Having two resident rangers increases the chances that one will be present when the other is away. Construction of the duplex has taken more time than anticipated due to complexities in the design and permit approval stage. An architect and landscape architect prepared the initial plans based on procedures and criteria outlined by the county land development staff . The procedures and criteria were changed, which complicated the design phase by requiring a special permit for non- conforming use and a separate septic system for each unit. A complete revision of the plans was necessary. County zoning and ordinances require special use permits for creating separate living units within an existing residence where either of the units exceeds 750 square feet. Because the duplex was to provide living space for two rangers and R-89-151 Page Three their tamilies, the house needed to be split on a fairly equal basis . Lower Residence The lower house was occupied by the former operations supervisor until June, 1989 . The existing Comprehensive Use and Management Plan suggests that the house be divided into a duplex, but preliminary cost estimates indicate that this is not financially feasible. Creating two separate living units at this structure presented major design and mechanical problems related to creating a new kitchen, splitting the heating system, and lack of space for a second septic system in an area where the existing system is failing. Disposition of the lower house was re-evaluated in conjunction with planning future expansion of the foothills area field office. A portion of the house could be utilized for storage space. There is an immediate need for storing administrative and printed materials , which are regularly sent from the main office to the field office where they occupy space that could be better used for storage of field equipment and supplies. Some old office equipment and furniture is currently stored in a portion of the house. There is also a need for a meeting room that can be used by the growing field staff and occasionally by the office staff . At this time, there are approximately 23 full-time members of the field staff and 20 staff members at the main office. There is no space within the foothills area field office for conducting large staff meetings , and it is often difficult to hold large staff meetings at the Mountain View office building. In many ways, the lower house is an ideal place to hold such meetings. The central living room can accommodate approximately 50 people. The kitchen and bathrooms are operable and of adequate size to serve groups of this size. A gravel parking area on the east side of the house where the guest cottage was once located would be needed. In the past, the potential for developing a multiple use facility at the lower house was investigated. The concept was to allow staff and outside environmental organizations the opportunity to use the facility. This concept included establishing a caretaker or ranger residence within a portion of the house. This proposal was determined infeasible for the following reasons: a) An architect and engineer determined that separating the caretaker' s residence from the larger living space or meeting area would be quite expensive. Improvements such as including a new kitchen, sound walls , heating system, separation R-89-151 Page Four of electrical system, two septic systems , fencing, landscaping, and additional parking would be needed. The cost estimates ranged from $50, 000 to $100,000, depending on the complexities in separating the utilities. b) The fire marshall indicated that a public meeting space would require a number of significant improvements, including ample turning space near the house for a fire truck, an interior sprinkler system, and new safety doors. c) Staff determined that the traffic on either the St. Josephs entry road or the Mora entrance would have a serious impact on trail use. It has always been difficult to make non-district visitors aware of the extreme caution needed when driving through the preserve. Special events with on-site parking require District staff to conduct traffic control . Visitors using the trail system are offended by this traffic because they are seeking recreation away from traffic. The fiscal and physical impacts would be less if the house is not separated for residential or public use. If the house is used solely for District purposes , specifically for needed storage and meeting space, the expense and impacts on the preserve would be sharply reduced. The house would be left as it is with the exception of some minor structural and cosmetic improvements. The pool , which the City of Mountain View has recently abandoned, would be filled and an outside picnic area or classroom would be developed in its place. The site of the demolished guest house would provide additional parking. Because no major capital improvements would be needed, flexible options for future use or removal of the building would be possible. The approximate cost of filling the pool and upgrading the structure and grounds is $18 , 000. Using the structure for some of the District ' s immediate needs would eliminate the need to improve the facility to meet additional public codes, particularly fire and septic requirements. The perimeter rooms could serve as storage for office equipment , files , and printed material . The large living space and garden area could be used for staff meetings and other staff events. Currently, full staff meetings and/or field staff training sessions are held at the main office, drawing field staff members far from their patrol areas . Staff social events or retreats are often held at the main office, Hidden Villa, or at lease areas such as Deer Hollow Farm and Sunrise Winery. Many of these events could be held at the lower house. Confining the use to District-sponsored meetings and events R-89-1 Page Five is the most critical aspect of this proposal . It will ensure that traffic generated by such uses is closely controlled. Vehicle traffic to the lower house will only be manageable if facility use and related vehicle traffic is confined to low use periods and those who are sensitive to the potential conflicts with trail users . Foothills Area Field Office The foothills area field office is comprised of four main structures and outlying storage areas, occupying approximately two acres of land. It serves as the central corporation yard facility for the District and the field office for the foothills area. Seventeen field staff members work out of this facility. The majority of these employees are responsible for the patrol and maintenance of eleven preserves located in the lower foothill region and all "in-house" capital improvements for the District. It also serves as the central storage and shop facility for fire equipment, building materials , signs, radio equipment, uniforms, and heavy equipment. The foothill area field office has been operating since the preserve was acquired in 1977 . In general , it has served the District well because of its central location, providing fair access to the foothill preserves, main office, and local services . However, over the past few years, the facility has failed to meet the needs of District field staff . This problem has resulted from inadequate space to house the increasing staff and equipment. As a result, alternatives were explored to determine the best approach to meeting additional demands . The first step was to explore the possibility of relocating the field office. In looking at centrally located lands that the District currently owns or could potentially acquire, Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve still appears to be the most suitable location for such a facility. If a new location was available, the cost of providing a new facility versus enlarging and remodelling the existing facility would probably be prohibitive at this time. The estimated cost of providing a new building similar to, but slightly larger than, the main building now being used is about $250, 000 to $300, 000. Enlarging the existing building to the size needed would be approximately $100, 000. The good location and lower cost associated with using the existing field office warranted an in-depth feasibility study for its expansion. This study was conducted by Hawley, Peterson and Snyder, a local architectural firm with experience in planning maintenance and operation facilities for local public agencies. The consultant worked with District planning and field staff from October, 1988 through January, 1989. The R-89-151 Page Six following tasks were undertaken: 1) inventorying existing conditions and needs, 2) determining future needs, 3) identifying short and long term solutions , and 4) preparing of conceptual plans. The study shows that the field office has inadequate space for staff work space, mechanical work areas, and equipment storage. In identifying future needs , projections were made in regard to number of staff, types of work tasks, and storage needs. The possibility of establishing a third ranger field office in the south part of the District was also considered. Such a facility could decrease some of the needs for expanding the existing facility at Rancho San Antonio. When identifying short and long-term solutions , it became apparent that providing adequate office and shop work space is a priority. To accomplish this, plans for expanding the existing main building were developed. The long-term solutions involve providing storage spaces and a new fuel station. The estimated cost for implementing the short-term plan is approximately $100, 000. The long-term plan will cost an additional $230, 000. The facilities study and short and long-term plans will be presented to you in more detail along with the overall site plan at your November 8 meeting. Specific attention has been given to the issue of retaining fuel tanks . There are currently two tanks located at the back of the main building. These are inspected once a month to determine their safety in compliance with state and Santa Clara County regulations. On October 18 , 1989 , the District received a written communication from the health department advising the removal of these tanks as soon as possible to avoid potential leakage due to their age. The tanks have single walls, which are no longer permitted because if they leak the toxic material penetrates directly into the ground. It should also be noted that these tanks are located in the proposed expansion area of the main building and will need to be removed to accommodate construction. Given the nature and scope of the field operations program continuous fuel storage at the foothills area field office is required. Going off site for fuel would significantly impact field staff productivity. Recently the only gas station on Foothill Expressway corridor, offering 24-hour service, has closed. This could have a serious impact on staff ' s needs for fuel on weekends and at odd hours. The field staff is also concerned about a repeat of the situation that exited during the oil crisis of the early 1980 ' s that had rangers waiting in gas lines. It appears that an above-ground R-89-151 Page Seven storage tank may be feasible during the interim period following removal of existing tanks and installation of new tanks scheduled to occur in the second phase of expansion. Implementation of these projects will occur over a three- year period. The first step is to review and revise the conceptual plans as needed, based on input from the Board and the operations supervisor. Since the operations supervisor position has just recently been filled, it is necessary to allow time for him to become more acquainted with the foothill region to assess the adequacy of the plans. When this assessment is complete, staff will return to you with final plans for the first phase of construction for your approval , including funding needs and sources, and an authorization request to advertise for construction bids. At this time, staff is requesting authorization to remove the existing gas tanks and to proceed with preparing detailed plans and cost estimates for meeting the short-term needs of the foothill field office. Water System The second phase of the major water system improvement project was completed in September, 1989. This phase included the continuation of the main supply line from the bridge near the Deer Hollow Farm residence to the middle of the farm area. It provided for service hookups and a fire hydrant. The City of Mountain View provided the majority of funding, and the District coordinated the project and supervised the construction contract. The third and final phase of the project will extend the main supply line to the ranger facility. It is anticipated to be completed in the 1990-1991 fiscal year. Restrooms The existing Comprehensive Use and Management Plan directs staff to conduct a feasibility study for providing new restroom facilities in the central portion of the preserve. This recommendation came from lengthy discussions with the City of Mountain View regarding overuse of their restroom facilities by the general public. As a result of those discussions, District staff helps to maintain the city' s restrooms until more adequate facilities are provided. In November 1988, the District hired the firm of Van Kirk Engineers to conduct a feasibility study to investigate potential locations for constructing a restroom building, septic tank, and leach fields. Upon determining the best location, a cost analysis was requested. Three locations were selected in the central part of the preserve (see attached Exhibit D) . The creekside setback requirement, which prohibits leach fields within 100 feet of R-89-151 Page Eight the creek corridor, is the most limiting factor in selecting the site for the restroom structure. This factor alone ruled out sites one and three as shown on the map. Site two, located near the large open barn, was the only location explored further. The only leach field area available is 1600 feet upslope from the restroom site, located in Rogue Valley near the intersection of the Ravensbury Trail . This creates the need for a long transport pipeline and pump system. The only way to reduce the distance and the need for a pump system is to locate the restroom structure in the immediate vicinity of the leach field. This is not desirable because the restroom would be too far from the high use area. As the cost estimates were developed for site two, it became apparent these estimates needed to be examined in comparison to cost estimates for constructing chemical recirculating facilities more commonly used on District preserves. The following is a comparative summary of these cost estimates . Septic Self-contained Plans & administration $ 26 , 500 $ 1 , 500 Building & plumbing 25, 000 27 , 000 Septic & leach Fields 74, 000 4, 000 ------ ------ Total $ 125, 000 $ 32, 500 Annual maintenance 600 $ 2, 300 (initial year) Estimated expenditures $ 145, 839 $ 108 , 551 over the first 20 years (Based on initial capital improvement costs and a 5% annual increase in maintenance) This information indicates that in the first year there is a $92, 500 savings in constructing the chemical recirculating restrooms and that the savings continue well beyond a 20- year period. This analysis, though, is based on availability of transport services and waste receiving facilities that are becoming more difficult to locate, due in part to the toxicity of the chemical required for the recirculating units . New chemicals are being researched, and it is hoped the problem will be overcome in the near future. If not, it is conceivable that the cost of maintaining these facilities may exceed the estimated 5% annual increase as shown in the preceding analysis . Deer Hollow Farm Area There have been many improvements at Deer Hollow Farm since the Comprehensive Use and Management Plan was last reviewed in 1986 . All of the main farm buildings have been painted R-89-15- Page Nine and new roofs have been installed. The caretaker ' s residence was also painted. Foundations were built underneath the old apple shed and the carriage shed located west of the Grant house. New windows were added to both buildings. Electricity was extended to the blacksmith shed and the main barn. There are future plans to improve the farm' s existing water system and connect it into the new four inch water line recently installed along the road for fire protection. A new organic vegetable garden was planted in the area between the large open barn and the pig barn. Redwood fencing was installed around the garden, and a greenhouse was built. New fencing has also been installed around many of the animal areas and the orchard area. Young fruit trees have recently been planted in the orchard area. Two of the animal barns have been reconstructed on the site of the original barns. Concrete floors were laid in several of the outdoor animal feeding areas. Construction of a concrete floor in the garage is currently underway. The Grant house has been covered with plastic and braced to prevent it from collapsing. Grant funds were sought over the past year from the Proposition 70 grant program, but the restoration project was not funded. No new outside funding sources have been identified at this time. However, City of Mountain View staff have indicated an interest in helping provide labor and equipment and in helping to identify funding sources for the restoration. Rhus Ridge House Trailer The condition of the house trailer located near the entrance to Duveneck Windmill Pasture Area has been investigated. The Preliminary Use and Management Plan for this site directed staff to look into the feasibility of relocating the existing trailer to a less visible location. Current regulations and ordinances do not permit new house trailers or the relocation of existing trailers. The trailer is identified as a non-conforming use. Since it was present prior to the adoption of the regulations , it may remain on the site and be improved, but not be replaced nor relocated. In an effort to screen the trailer and associated parking area, plans and specifications have been prepared to construct fencing and landscaping along the trail corridor. The water system serving the house trailer is part of a larger system which has been maintained by residents along Rhus Ridge Road. The system is comprised of a well and various lines connecting the local residences . The residents are abandoning the system and connecting to a private water company service line . They have indicated R-89-151 Page Ten that it may be possible for the District' s resident caretaker to continue obtaining water from the well as long as he maintains the system. If the system fails or becomes too expensive to maintain, it may be more advantageous to connect the trailer to the water company service line. New or Revised Use and Management Recommendations 1 . The lower house will be improved to provide storage space and accommodate District-sponsored meetings and training events . Improvements will include door and wall repairs, painting, plumbing repairs , carpeting, landscaping, and filling of the swimming pool . The anticipated cost for the improvements is $20, 000. 2 . Staff will proceed with the first phase expansion plans for the foothill area field office. The conceptual plans will be finalized following a review by the operations supervisor. Construction drawings and cost estimates will be prepared for Board review and approval . The anticipated cost for preparing these plans and specifications is $10, 000. The cost estimate for the first phase of construction is $100 , 000 . 3. The two fuel tanks will be removed and replaced by an above ground portable fuel tank. The anticipated cost is $20, 000. 4 . The third phase of the water system will be constructed, connecting the main water line to the foothill field office facility. The anticipated cost is $15, 000. 5. A chemical recirculating restroom facility will be constructed in the vicinity of the junction of the main valley trail and Mora Trail . The exact location will be based on the alignment of the proposed Mora Trail extension and Deer Hollow Farm bypass trail so that it is easily accessible to users of each of these trails . The anticipated cost is $32, 500. 6 . Plans and specifications for restoring the Grant house will be prepared. With the assistance of City of Mountain View staff, District staff will continue to investigate outside funding sources for the restoration work. If outside funding is not found by July 1990, the District will begin restoration using City of Mountain View labor or an outside contractor, to stabilize and protect the house. Plans and specifications are anticipated to cost $5,000. Stabilization R-89-151 Page Eleven construction by an outside contractor is anticipated to cost $15, 000. 7 . The house trailer near Rhus Ridge will be fenced and landscaped to screen it adequately from the public trail . The anticipated cost is $3, 500. B. CEQA Compliance The projects contained herein are determined to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. II �'' I �i I I R I I. 1 I I b F { 1 _ __�_. __ _ _ � �-_v .W _ m- MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Mm. EXHIBIT A Rancho San Antonio Open Sp�lce Preserve . . . ........ BICYCLES ALLOWED ONLY ON ROAD INTO DEER HOLLOW FARM OR ON BIKE TRAILS IN RANCHO SAN ANTONIO COUNTY PARK )UVr-N RANCHO SAN ANTONIO kvh, UPPER HOUSE COUNTY PARK PARKING R OW-1 or lOU �7"l)j'j -R HOLLOW F MEADOW "?DE PROR )SED--w -.,,RESTI ILITY Q U E S T R I AN NG �-R '61 N .. ....... r 1 F i e RHUS ROAD A $j�.. +1�=\ �ut�'`°'"`.a'`!''�.i,..N- t� a �..�.. � Vim,;✓.� a"'.4t-f �doa a .�i �� .+.� ON �`?�, „yam � ��i°�.. ,1 ,.� ,r^�';�. $I ,m^e•�'" ,` �k e •♦ o��� 'f1t 2i...., /.ie�•L.�a..�i-...,a."ip°...,. 9. p, „ VILLA p M; � No OPEN SPACE EASEMENT : Qgg pu loll BELLO O.S. MM RIDGE O.S.Pll Y .R 9" a -- .: u EXHIBIT "C" October 30, 1989 RANCHO SAN AMMO OPEN SPACE PRESERVE - USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY (STRUCTURES ONLY) Project ;Budgeted ;Projected;Proposed Description Comments on Plans or Project ;FY 89-90 ;FY 90-91 ;Completion Planning Tasks 1 Use and management plan review ;Last reviewed 5/86 ; ; 12/89 2 Plans for restroom facility ;Feasibility study complete, specs needed; 2000 ; 1000 ; 06/90 3 Plans to stabilize Grant house ;Obtained engineers recommendations i i ; Complete 4 Plans for restoring Grant house ;Preliminary plans complete, detailed i 1 5000 ; 09/90 ;plans to be prepared ; ; _ 5 Plans for H2O system ;Plans complete for phase 2 and 3 i ; Complete 6 Plans for upper house duplex ;Modified for conditional permit ; Complete 2 Master plan ranger facility ;Master plan complete ; Complete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Anticipated New or Revised Reccmmendations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 Plans for Rhus Ridge trailer ;Relocation investigated, propose screen ; ; ; Complete 8 Plans to expand ranger facility ;Phase 1 plans and specifications 1 12500 > 10000 ; 90-91 9 Plans to upgrade lower house ;Drought tolerant landscape plan i 3000 > 2000 ; 90-91 Subtotal 17500 18000 Captial Improvements 1 Construct H2O system ;Phase 2 complete, Mtn. View contributed ; 4000 ; 15000 ; 90-91 $11,000, phase 3 to be constructed it 2 Construct upper house duplex ;Septic and landscaping pending 1 20000 ; ; 12/89 3 Landscape upper house duplex IFill pool and landscape i { 7500 1 90-91 4 Improve ranger facility ;Installed flammable materials shed i 6000 ; ; 12/89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AnticipatedNeworRevisedRecommendations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 Construct restrocm facility ;Pending plans and permits 1 31500 ; 90-91 6 Restore Grant house ;Basic structural work anticipated 1 15000 ; 90-91 7 Expansion of ranger facility ;Phase 1 expansion to main building ; 100000 ; 90-91 8 Fence Rhus Ridge trailer ;Fencing and landscaping 3500 ; 90-91 Subtotal 30000 172500 Special Maintenance and Projects 1 Stabilize Grant house ;Bracing and tarping complete Complete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Anticipated New or Revised Recommendations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 Upgrade lower house ;Fill pool, landscape, paint, etc. i i 18000 1 90-91 3 Replace fuel station ;Remove old tanks, add above ground tank ; 1 20000 ; 90-91 i Subtotal 0 38000 Annual Maintenance and Projects 1 Monthly water service ;Mt. View reimburses $600 of actual i 1800 ; 2000 ; Ongoing 2 Restroom maint. (supplies) !District facility to be maintained ; 300 ; 300 ; Ongoing 3 Restroom maint. (pumping) ;District facility to be maintained 700 ; 2000 ; Ongoing 4 Ranger facility maintenance ;General repairs ; 800 ; 900 ; Ongoing 5 Ranger facility utilities ;Electricity and oil 2400 ; 2600 ; Ongoing 6 Lower house maintenance ;General repairs 500 ; 500 ; Ongoing 7 Lower house utilities ;Electricity and oil 300 ; 300 ; Ongoing 8 Upper house maintenance ;General repairs, main unit needs repair ; 1 1000 ; Ongoing 9 Upper house utilities ;Electricity and propane 1 1000 ; Ongoing Subtotal 6800 10600 TOTAL 54300 239100 N Outside (grant) funding possible (>) Funding being moved forward PROPOSED /BRA/NF/ELD , A,PEA A ROGUE VALLEY a; ALTERNATIVE S/rE NO,4 O \\�'RE559I019! PR010,93ED 4OCAT/0 fAC/UTIEg, qj SEPTIC T.4iVKAND DEER ` PUMOSTAT/ON h'OLLOW RM ALTERIVATI✓E ITE NO.2 AL TERNAT/t/E SITE NO. �� --- - Goo \ ALTER Qr/VE SITE NO. 3 EXHIBIT D LOCATION PLAN ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES VAN KIRK ENGINEERS LOS ALTOS , CALIFORNIA R9�Za R-89-154 (Meeting 89-28 November 11 , 1989) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT November 3, 1989 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; J. Escobar, Operations Supervisor, D. Topley, Supervising Ranger; C . Bruins , Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Approval of Equipment Mechanic-Operator Job Classification, Job Specification, Salary Range, and Filling of One Position Recommended Actions : 1) Approve the creation of an equipment mechanic-operator job classification. 2) Approve the attached job specification for equipment mechanic operator and assign it a salary range of Step Number 206 to 236, with a corresponding monthly salary of $2191 to $2954 . 3) Authorize staff to fill one equipment mechanic-operator position. Background: On March 28 , 1989 , as part of the adoption of the Open Space Management budget and based on Open Space Management ' s five- year staffing plan, you approved funding for an equipment mechanic- operator position. The approval was contingent upon your approval of a job specification and salary range for the position. The proposed job specification (Attachment A) for equipment mechanic- operator has been prepared for your review. The recommended salary range is Step Number 206 to 236, with a corresponding monthly salary of $2191 to $2954 (Attachment B) . Discussion: Current members of the District ' s generalist field staff have a wide variety of skills that enable them to perform R-89-154 Page Two maintenance, construction, and patrol duties . About six field staff members, including three supervisors , have gained on-the- job, or brought with them to their District positions , experience in transporting, operating, and maintaining specialized and heavy equipment such as bulldozers , backhoes , front loaders , boom and flail mowers , dump trucks , and trail machines . However, because of varying work schedules and work assignments , these employees have only sporadic opportunities to transport, operate, and maintain such equipment . The addition of the mechanic-equipment operator position would allow one staff person, specifically skilled and trained in this area, to focus on such work assignments and projects, thus increasing the overall efficiency of the District ' s field operations . In addition, the mechanic-equipment operator would be responsible for the District ' s inventory of power tools and heavy equipment that currently exceeds 100 items, including generators, chain saws, rock drills, and augers . All of these need repairs and scheduled maintenance that requires specialized skills and knowledge. The District currently pays outside professionals up to $52 an hour to repair tools and equipment, and these repairs could more efficiently be done by an in-house equipment mechanic- operator. In addition, such in-house repair would reduce the time currently spent by rangers or open space technicians in transporting tools and equipment to various repair locations , and reduce the down-time that currently is created when tools or equipment cannot be repaired in a timely manner. The chart entitled Scope of Equipment Mechanic-Operator Position by Job Functions (Attachment C) shows the various functions and percentages of time to be spent performing each function as currently envisioned for the equipment mechanic-operator position. It should be noted that this is a totally new position for the District, and the percentages noted may change over time. The creation of this position will not currently eliminate the need for outside professional vehicle maintenance and repair services . Providing regular, full-service vehicle maintenance and repair requires an expensive shop facility and costly tools and equipment that the District does not have at this time. Staff has estimated that, if the equipment-mechanic operator were to oversee and undertake the maintenance and repair of the District ' s 24 vehicles , including major repair functions like engine overhauls, 85% of his or her time would be spent on this work function alone. Devoting this percentage of time to this one job function would not currently meet the field operations needs nor would it conform to the proposed job concept and specification. The equipment mechanic-operator is expected to perform only routine vehicle repair and maintenance at this time. It is anticipated that the person hired to fill this position R-89-154 Page Three would have knowledge of and experience in vehicle repair and maintenance to help oversee more major vehicle repairs and to, if it becomes beneficial later with this position, to carry out some of the major type of vehicle repairs. The District will benefit from the addition of the equipment mechanic-operator position in several ways . Field operations will be more efficient. The field staff time now spent transporting and/or operating heavy equipment can be used to help accomplish site maintenance projects and increase the time spent on visitor services. It is estimated there will be, to start, approximately $5, 000 savings in equipment maintenance and repair currently done outside the District, and $2, 000 savings in the area of minor vehicle repairs. In addition, and very importantly, the equipment mechanic-operator can increase the level of safety and skill at which equipment is maintained, operated, and transported. Staff performed research on other agencies that have positions with comparable functions and used the information to develop the proposed job specification and salary range for-thisposition. Because the equipment mechanic-operator is a somewhat unique and specialized position and also because the District is unique in terms of support departments available to or assisting such a position, it was difficult to find similar job specifications for comparison. Most agencies have a separate job specification for equipment operator and mechanic. The proposed salary range was based primarily on the internal relationships of District positions . Attachment B MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SALARY PAY PLAN 1989-1990 i MONMY+ ANNUALLY+ CLASSIFICATION STEP NO. KBFMAX MIN-MAX Receptionist-Typist 165 to 195 1457 to 1964 17,488 to 23,571 Senior Typist Clerk 165 to 195 1457 to 1964 17,488 to 23,751 Open Space Technician* 176 to 206 1626 to 2191 19,510 to 26,297 Secretary 183 to 213 1743 to 2350 20,918 to 28,194 Office Mgr./Sec'y to Gen. Mgr. 192 to 222 1906 to 2570 22,878 to 30,835 Accounting Specialist 194 to 224 1945 to 2621 23,337 to 31,455 Ranger** 196 to 226 1984 to 2674 23,806 to 32,087 Real Estate Research Analyst 196 to 226 1984 to 2674 23,806 to 32,087 Docent Coordinator 196 to 226 1984 to 2674 23,806 to 32,087 Volunteer Coordinator 196 to 226 1984 to 2674 23,806 to 32,087 Associate Open Space Planner 201 to 231 2085 to 2810. 25,021 to 33,724 Senior Ranger 206 to 236 2191 to 2954 26,297 to 35,445 Administrative Assistant-OSMgnt 206 to 236 2191 to 2954 26,297 to 35,445 Equipment Mechanic-Operator 206 to 236 2191 to 2954 26,297 to 35,445 Environmental Analyst 211 to 241 2303 to 3104 27,639 to 37,253 Open Space Planner 211 to 241 2303 to 3104 27,639 to 37,253 Supervising Ranger 216 to 246 2421 to 3263 29,048 to 39,153 Principal Open Space Planner 230 to 260 2783 to 3750 33,390 to 45,005 Real Property Representative 231 to 261 2810 to 3788 33,724 to 45,455 Operations Supervisor 236 to 266 2954 to 3981 35,445 to 47,774 Public Communications Coordinator 228 to 258 2728 to 3677 32,732 to 44,118 Administrative Services Manager 235 to 265 2924 to 3941 35,094 to 47,301 Land Manager*** 268 to 298 4061 to 5474 48,734 to 65,686 Land Acquisition Manager*** 268 to 298 4061 to 5474 48,734 to 65,686 *The salary range for Seasonal Open Space Technician is $6.00 to $9.00 pe per hour with actual individual rate to be determined at time of hire. ** t a Ranger base sal for assi **Five point pay differential added to ange salary gnmen as Crew Coordinating Ranger. ***Range of three points to five points to be added to base salary as approved d by General Manager for Assistant General Manager. +Forty hours per week basis. F_ Attachment A EQUIPMENT MECHANIC-OPERATOR JOB SPECIFICATION DEFINITION: Under supervision of the crew supervising ranger, performs maintenance and repair of a wide variety of park maintenance equipment, including gasoline and diesel powered equipment and electric powered shop tools . Operates and transports light to heavy equipment used in the maintenance and development of open space preserves . Performs minor maintenance and repairs on vehicles and heavy equipment. May supervise personnel working on maintenance and construction projects. TYPICAL TASKS • Equipment Maintenance and Repair Performs minor repairs and periodic maintenance work such as oil changes and tune-ups on heavy equipment and vehicles. Maintains and repairs mechanical equipment such as portable pumps and gasoline generators , chain saws , rototillers, and mowers. Operates and maintains hand and power tools , welding apparatus , and other shop equipment necessary to the work. Initiates and maintains a preventive maintenance system for equipment, including record keeping. Performs equipment safety inspections and submits condition reports . Maintains records and inventory of parts . Assists with preparation of annual cost data on equipment repairs and maintenance for budget purposes. Performs other related work as needed. Equipment Operation and Transport Operates heavy equipment, including but not limited to backhoes , loaders , bulldozers, trail machines, jackhammers, and dump trucks to maintain and construct trails, parking lots, ditches, fuel breaks , and other improvements on open space preserves . Transports heavy equipment and materials to and from work sites . Performs other related work as needed. EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS: Completion of the twelfth grade and three years experience, preferably in a park maintenance program, is required. Experience must include operating and transporting heavy equipment and maintenance and repair of vehicles, tools, and power equipment. Completion of a technical training program in a related field may be substituted for one year of experience. A valid driver's license is a condition of initial and continued employment for this classification. In addition, individual must possess or be able to obtain a valid California or Class A driver ' s license as a condition of initial and continued employment. First Aid and CPR certification is highly desirable. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES: Individual must possess the following: considerable knowledge of the safe and correct operation and preventive maintenance of heavy and light equipment, machines and power tools; ability to work effectively with other employees and the public; ability to read and write English at a level appropriate for successful job performance; and knowledge of metal working and fabrication. PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS: Individual must possess and maintain appropriate strength, endurance, and agility, and must be mentally alert and emotionally mature. Individual must have normal or fully corrected hearing and vision. SPECIAL NOTE• Individual may have to work on weekends and holidays and/or at odd and irregular hours and in rough and remote field conditions . Individual must wear the prescribed District uniform and adhere to strict safety procedures and work procedures. Attachment C Scope of Equipment Mechanic Operator Job Position by Job Functions FUNCTION OF TIME Equipment Operation Road repair, trail construction, and culvert 20% installation using bulldozer, trail machine, and backhoe. Equipment Maintenance and Repair Chain saws, generators, fire pumpers, 35% rock drills, mowers , jackhammers, augers , trail bikes , cement mixer, rototiller, and portable electric tools . Lubrication and oil and filter changes, and other minor repairs for heavy equipment. Shop Organization and Inventory Parts storage and ongoing inventory control. 20% Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Oil and filter changes and other minor routine 10% repairs. Metal Fabrication and Welding Gate, tool, and equipment repair or fabrication. 5% Administration and RecordketpAnq Maintenance records , preventive maintenance 10% program, equipment safety inspections , and cost and time analyses. R-89-155 (Meeting 89-28 November 8 , 1989) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT November 1 , 1989 TO: Board of Directors FROM: C. Britton, Assistant General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: D. Hansen, Land Manager; D. Woods , Principal Open Space Planner; M. Gundert, Associate Open Space Planner; C. Bruins , Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Proposed Addition of Smith Property to Mt. Melville Area of Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve Recommended Actions: 1 . Adopt the accompanying Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Mid peninsula Regional Open Space District Authorizing Acceptance of Purchase Agreement, Authorizing Officer to Execute Certificate of Acceptance of Grant to District, and Authorizing General Manager to Execute Any and All Other Documents Necessary or Appropriate to Closing of the Transaction (Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve, Lands of Smith) . 2 . Tentatively adopt the Preliminary Use and Management Plan recommen- dations contained in this report, including naming the property as an addition to the Mt. Melville Area of Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve. 3 . Indicate your intention to withhold the property from dedication as public open space at this time. 4 . Instruct staff to have the 10-acre homesite surveyed and return to the Board with a specific proposal for marketing a long-term or life interest in the home and site. Introduction The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District currently has the oppor- tunity to purchase a key 48 . 66-acre ridge parcel of land adjacent to the Mt. Melville Area of Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve . The property includes the 2 , 240 foot summit of an unnamed hill next to Mt. Melville . The hilltop is developed with a large five-bedroom home. 1. Property Identification Property owner: Jan M. Smith Size: 48 . 66 acres R-89-155 Page two 2. Location and Boundaries (see attached map) Regional setting: Unincorporated San Mateo County; west of Skyline Boulevard and south of Mt. Melville Road access : Rapley Ranch Road off Skyline Boulevard (State Highway 35) Boundaries : Bounded by District land to the northeast, Rapley Ranch Road to the north, and private property on the remaining sides Nearby public lands : The Mt. Melville Area of Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve adjoins the property to the northeast. Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve is located 0 . 2 of a mile south. Coal Creek Open Space Preserve borders the eastern boundary of Skyline Boulevard. Nearby landmarks : The 2 , 190 foot summit of Mt. Melville is 0. 2 of a mile northeast, and the 2, 256 foot Langley Hill is 0. 8 of a mile west. 3. Topography and Hydrology Prominent topographic features: A prominent grassy hill dominates the property. From this high point, the property slopes steeply toward the west. Elevation range: 1 , 800 feet on the northwestern corner to 2 , 240 feet on the eastern boundary Slope steepness: Slopes are moderately steep to steep, with the exception of the gentle slopes in the northeastern corner. Slope exposure: Primarily west-facing Watershed: Slopes drain into Woodruff Creek, which feeds into La Honda Creek 4 . Geology and Soils Seismology: San Andreas Fault located 1 .7 miles east Soil classification: Sweeney-Mindego soil classification; these soils are generally shallow but stable Soil stability: Moderate to highest susceptibility to landsliding 5. Flora and Fauna Plant communities : Primarily grassland; oak woodland and mixed evergreen forest in the drainages to the west Dominant flora: European and native grasses, oaks , Douglas fir, and madrone R-89-155 Page three Common fauna: Deer, coyote, bobcat, fox, skunk, and raccoon 6. Visual Qualities Viewshed: Contributes to the scenic backdrop of Russian Ridge and viewshed of Skyline Boulevard, a state scenic highway Vistas : Magnificent 360 degree views extending north to San Francisco, south to San Jose, west to the Pacific Ocean, and east to Mount Diablo. 7 . Existing Improvements II The property contains a 2, 700 square foot, five-bedroom, three-bath home perched upon the highest hilltop on the property. A barn and workshop are located in the northernmost corner of the property. A well is located near the barn and workshop. The structures were not affected by the October 17 , 1989 earthquake. The driveway leaves Rapley Ranch Road at the northern border of the property and enters the subject property. The driveway cuts through the length of the property, wrapping around the southern border, climbing along the eastern boundary of the property, and ending at the house on the hilltop. 8 . Existing Use At the present time, the seller lives in the house on the hilltop. He will move out before close of escrow. The barn is in poor condition, unused at the present time and more of a scenic remnant of the past. The adjacent structure has been used as a toolshed and workshop and is in good condition. 9. Planning Considerations Political boundaries: Unincorporated San Mateo County, outside but adjacent to District boundaries and within District ' s sphere of influence Zoning: Resource Management. A slope density determination conducted by San Mateo County planning staff indicates a potential of three building sites on the property. Master Plan rating: Not rated; similar areas nearby rated medium for composite open space resource value Use and Management Plan review: The Use and Management Plan for Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve was reviewed in 1987 . The next review will probably occur in 1990. Regional plans: The proposed Bay Area Ridge Tail parallels Skyline Boulevard in this area and could pass through this property. R-89-155 Page four 10 . Potential Use and Management Staff has conducted a trail study of this area to determine a feasible alignment for the Bay Area Ridge Trail . Two alternative routes have been identified: a trail that follows the east-facing side of the ridge and a west-facing alignment. The west slope alignment is preferred due to the potential for a multi-use trail . The east slope alternative, due to the steep side slopes , would be limited to a narrow trail and would not meet the needs of all trail it users . The subject property is a major link in the preferred west slope trail route. The large home contributes significant value to the property and therefore represents a financial investment to the District that should be recaptured over time. The home has no known potential for District or public use and should be leased on a long-term arrange- ment in order to provide a return on the District ' s investment. Because of the critical nature of this property, a sale or trade of fee title with restrictions should only be considered after careful study and only as a last resort. The house should be rented on an interim basis until staff has time to prepare a proposal for long- term lease or sale of a life or limited term interest in the home and surrounding site. The barn, workshop and well should be included in any rental or lease agreement. 11 . Preliminary Use and Management Recommendations Signs: Install private property signs and boundary plaques where necessary Roads : Maintain for access to the house Structures : The home and ancillary buildings should be rented immediately, allowing staff time to formulate a specific proposal on ultimate disposition for Board consideration. 12. Name The property should be named as an addition to the Mt. Melville Area of Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve. 13. Dedication I recommend that you withhold the property from dedication at this time to allow for the future lease, trade, or sale of interests in the developed portion of the site. 14 . C.E.Q.A. Compliance The acquisition of the property mentioned in this report has been determined to be categorically exempt under the California Environ- mental Quality Act guidelines . R-89-155 Page five 15. Terms In accordance with the terms of the attached purchase agreement, the full purchase price for this property is $1 , 400, 000, payable in cash at close of escrow. The property has been listed for $1 , 500, 000 , and the purchase price is in accordance with the independent fee appraisal of the property obtained by the District. The home has been inspected by a structural and pest control company, a general contractor, and a roofing contractor. The septic system, well , water system, and solar system have also been inspected, and the main structures are in excellent condition. The driveway to the property currently needs additional gravel and blading with a bulldozer, which would cost approximately $10,000. It is currently estimated that if the District were to subdivide a 10-acre site surrounding the home, it would have a market value of approximately $850, 000. Because of the substantial value of the home and surrounding site and the necessity for the District to recapture some of this investment for acquisition of other open space land, it would be prudent for the District to market the resale of the developed area as soon as possible on a life interest or term of years basis. Under such a arrangement, the full property ownership would be returned to the District for future open space purposes at the end of the economic life of the improvements . 16 . Fundina The full explanation of this funding summary is contained in report R-89-103 dated July 3, 1989. The District ' s 1989-1990 fiscal year budget includes $6 . 0 million for new open space acquisitions; $5. 5 million in cash outlay and $0 . 5 million in notes. The following is a current summary of cash expenditures for open space acquisition for the 1989-1990 fiscal year: Land Acquisition Funds for this Fiscal Year (Cash) $5, 500 , 000 Previously Approved Acquisitions ( 1 , 405, 485) The Smith Property Acquisition Recommended for Approval on this Agenda ( 1 , 400, 000) Remaining Cash Balance for Future Acquisitions this Fiscal Year $2, 694, 515 An accounting of the expenditure of the District projects, under Proposition 70 , is as follows: 1) The net amount of $8 , 865, 000 in specified projects has been spent as follows: Teague Hill $6, 402, 500 Sierra Azul 2, 462, 500 $8 , 865, 000 R-89-155 Page six 2) The net amount of $985, 000 for the specific project of connec- tions between District preserves and Castle Rock and Portola State Parks remains unspent. 3) An accounting of the net amount of $968 , 000 in per capita funds for expansion of District preserves is being spent as follows: Total funds available $ 968, 000 Sierra Azul acquisitions approved but not billed 225, 373 The Smith property acquisition recommended for approval on this agenda 779, 500 Remaining funds available for future acquisitions this fiscal year under this program ($ 36, 873) * Submittal of this acquisition for Proposition 70 Per Capita reimbursement will exhaust the funds in this category. MIDPENINSULA REGIONALDISTRICT N6 Coal Creek Open Space 0 am Russian Ridge Open Space ; 'PROPOSED A••7. If • of � =� � �; �� 48.66 ACRES 12 COAL CREEK • 6�F ,, m1 W,40 Nli WE "All I ` ram. ` ► �,, � �, rz # � + A QX TOP I Nj Z)KYLINE RID P. . �Y PAR! TOLA i t � � • ROAD E- �a'�. V! o«.° ..,.. t .: wErs, �' 3 inC°•3.. �'^'� F. ,a`.`� `°� ',..""a`". y„�•!-�`t ``>.>.: e.,ye. # ,4i'9° "04°"�..ll �ii0a �.! .0 3a 3 ..`:> .. .� ` 4M dMW MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Coal Creek Legend This 38&ac•e Preserve is located southwest of Portola Valley,between Alpine Road and Skyline Boulevard.Hex you can picnic on rolling meadows of garland, admix large madrones and a picturesque barn,and explore the forested headwaters O of two seeks. AUTO ENTRY The existing road network provides a pleasant four-mile trail system. Beginning at the CalTrans vista point along Skyline Boulevard,a 2.6 mile loop trail is paeaible. North o •tie parking area,follow the road which descends from Skyline Boulevard to they�►utheast, eventually adjoining Alpine Road. Follow Alpine Road to the HIKING ENTRY north to Gary Pete's Road, which will lead you back to Skyline Boulevard and following Skyline Boulevard southeast to the parking area. '*The Preserve is accessible from two points along Skyline Boulevard-One mile northwest of the Page Mill/Alpine Road intersection on the east side of Skyline " Boulevard is a CalTrans vista point with parking for 8 can. Additional roadside ® BICYCLING ENTRY parking is available along Skyline Boulevard and the Preserves boundary.Plea" call the District office before visiting this Preserve. Russian Ridge EQUESTRIAN ENTRY Russian Ridge is the prominent grassy ridgeline just west of Skyline Boulevard, near the Alpine Road intersection. The Preserve's 935 acres include the 2,572-foot summit if Borel Hill and the headwaters of Mindego Creek The high ridges offer panoramic views sweeping from Monterey Bay to San Francisco and the East Bay PARKING hills.Photographers will enjoy the changing patterns of light and shadow created by the sculptured ridges and deep valleys. Cattle may be seen grazing the grassy hillsides,a remnant of past ranch activity in the area. Three miles of trails meander through the Preserve from Skyline Boulevard ROAD across the ridges and down to Mindego Creek.Access to the Preserve is from two / points along Skyline Boulevard.Then is parking near the Alpine Road intersection where a trail in the southeast corner of the Preserve begins at a hiking stile.Another access point lies one mile northwestof this intersection on the east side of Skyline r� Boulevard, where there is a CalTrans vista point with parking for 8 cars. Cross / TRAIL Skyline Boulevard to enter the Preserve. Since the trails are not yet signed,please contact the District office before visiting this Preserve. Special access conditions are in effect, and your visit will be PATH made more enjoyable if you call the District office (415) „ 949-5500 before you leave home. Trails may be under con- struction or trail signs may not yet have been installed;park- ing may not be available close by;easement crossings,and/or X NO PUBLIC ACCESS other conditions may prevail. 3 .. CMU CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT f' UNIT: NO PUBLIC ACCESS `�.�;• atxot.r� f d'- S` /OOTMIIf IMtMt Tranco3 morn _ ,._. Woods an.o.noa� soonx.s REFERENCE POINT/ _� MtNpr hilt O.EM (1e � r g3[x�4 7.1 ,..�F..,S,... (S1. LANDMARK .�' 5.4 _ DISTANCE _. MrSF�r .�j J "`6 _J' REFERENCE MARKS •laOft"31-ce y aiosr�re stiue .o llF.a�tS[xv[ , a,;o, RESTROOMS i . i '•<,,E �,,.:o �---- - 3r I - - 4 ® POTABLE WATER MCODMKO �• +- •IA �. BACKPACK CAMPGROUND L PESCADEAO CREEx 1 , 3 3. -- ! , ® c RANGER RESIDENCE o.vx. ' � I s � f RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT, AUTHORIZING OFFICER TO EXECUTE CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT TO DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY AND ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE TO CLOSING OF THE TRANSACTION (RUSSIAN RIDGE OPEN SPACE PRESERVE, LANDS OF SMITH) The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does resolve as follows : Section One. The Board of Directors of the Midpenin- sula Regional Open Space District does hereby accept the offer contained in that certain Purchase Agreement between Jan M. Smith and the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof , and authorizes the President or appropriate officers to execute the Agreement on behalf of the District. Section Two. The President of the Board of Directors or other appropriate officer is authorized to execute a Certifi- cate of Acceptance on behalf of the District. Section Three. The General Manager of the District shall cause to be given appropriate notice of acceptance to the seller. The General Manager further is authorized to execute any and all other documents in escrow necessary or appropriate to the closing of the transaction. Section Four. The General Manager of the District is authorized to expend up to $15,000 to cover the cost of title insurance, escrow fees, survey, and other miscellaneous costs related to this transaction. Section Five. It is intended and hereby authorized that the District' s General Fund will be reimbursed in the amount of $1, 400, 000 from the proceeds of the next long term District no te issue. I� PURCHASE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into by and between JAN M. SMITH, a single man, hereinafter called "Seller" and the MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, a Public District formed pursuant to Article 3 of Chapter 3 of Division 5 of the California Public Resources Code, hereinafter called "District. " WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of certain real property which has open space and recreational value, located within an unincorporated area of the County of San Mateo, and being more particularly described within the body of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Seller entered into that certain "Exclusive Authorization and Right to Sell" agreement with Cornish & Carey Real Estate Company, on January 5, 1989, thereby offering said real property for sale to the general public; and WHEREAS , District was formed by voter initiative to solicit and receive conveyances of real property by purchase, exchange, gift , or bargain purchase for public park, recreation, scenic and open space purposes; and WHEREAS, District desires to purchase said property for open space preservation and as part of the ecological and aesthetic resources of the midpeninsula area; and WHEREAS , Seller wishes to sell and convey the entirety of said property to District, and District wishes to purchase said property upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED as follows : 1 . Purchase and Sale. Seller agrees to sell to District and District agrees to purchase from Seller, Seller ' s real property located within an unincorporated area of the County of San Mateo, State of California, containing forty-eight and sixty-six hundredths (48 .66) acres , more or less , and commonly referred to as San Mateo County Assessor ' s Parcel Nos . 078-210-100 and 078-210-220 . Said property being further described in the legal description attached to Preliminary Title Report Number 347533, dated March 15, 1989 , from First American Title Insurance Company; said title report attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. Said property to be conveyed together with any easements , rights of way, or rights of use which may be appurtenant or attributable to the aforesaid lands , and any and all improvements attached or affixed thereto. All of said real property and appurtenances herein- after called the "Subject Property" or the "Property. " Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 2 2 . Purchase Price. The total purchase price ("Purchase Price" ) for the Property shall be One Million Four Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1, 400 , 000 . 00) , which shall be payable in cash at the Closing (as defined in Section 3 hereof) . 3 . Escrow. Promptly upon execution of this Agreement, in accord- ance with Section 17 herein, an escrow shall be opened at First American Title Insurance Company, 555 Marshall Street, Redwood City, CA 94064 , phone number (415) 367-9050 , or other title company acceptable to District and Seller (hereinafter "Escrow Holder" ) through which the purchase and sale of the Property shall be consummated. A fully executed copy of this Agreement shall be deposited with Escrow Holder to serve as escrow instructions to Escrow Holder; provided that the parties shall execute such additional supplementary or customary escrow instructions as Escrow Holder may reasonably require . This Agreement may be amended or supple- mented by explicit additional escrow instructions signed by the parties , but the printed portion of such escrow instructions shall not supersede any inconsistent provisions contained herein. Escrow Holder is hereby appointed and instructed to deliver, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement , the documents and monies to be deposited into the escrow as herein provided, with the following terms and conditions to apply to said escrow: (a) The time provided for in the escrow for the close thereof shall be prior to January 5, 1990 but after January 1 , 1990 , provided, however, that the parties may, by written agreement, change the time for Closing. The term "Closing" as used herein shall be deemed to be the date when Escrow Holder causes the Grant Deed (as defined below) to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County. (b) Seller and District shall , during the escrow period, execute any and all documents and perform any and all acts reasonably necessary or appropriate to consummate the purchase and sale pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. (c) Seller shall deposit into the escrow on or before the Closing an executed and recordable Grant Deed covering the Property. (d) District shall deposit into the escrow, on or before the Closing: (i) The required Certificate of Acceptance for the Grant Deed, duly executed by District and to be dated as of the Closing. (e) District shall pay for the escrow fees , the CLTA Standard Policy of Title Insurance, if required by District, and all recording costs and fees . All other costs or expenses not otherwise provided for in this Agreement shall be apportioned or allocated between District and Seller in the manner customary in San Mateo County. All current property taxes on the Property shall be handled in accordance with Section 4986 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 3 (f) Seller shall cause First American Title Insurance Company, or other title company acceptable to District and Seller, to be prepared and committed to deliver to District a CLTA standard coverage Policy of Title Insurance, dated as of the Closing, insuring District in the amount of $1, 400, 000 . 00 for the Property showing title to the Property vested in fee simple in District, subject only to: (i) current real property taxes, and (ii) reported title exceptions I through 9 , and (iii) such additional title exceptions as may be acceptable to District. In the event District disapproves of any additional title exceptions and Seller is unable to remove any District disapproved exceptions before the time set forth for the Closing, District shall have the right either: W to terminate the escrow provided for herein (after giving written notice to Seller of such disapproved exceptions and affording Seller at least twenty (20) days to remove such exceptions) and then Escrow Holder and Seller shall, upon District' s direction, return to the parties depositing the same, all monies and documents theretofore delivered to Escrow Holder or; (ii) to close the escrow and consummate the purchase of the Property. (g) Escrow Holder shall, when all required funds and instru- ments have been deposited into the escrow by the appropriate parties and when all other conditions to Closing have been fulfilled, cause the Grant Deed and attendant Certificate of Acceptance to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County. Upon the Closing, Escrow Holder shall cause to be delivered to District the original of the policy of the title insurance if required herein, and to Seller Escrow Holder' s check for the full purchase price of the Subject Property (less Seller ' s portion of the expenses described in Section 3 (e) ) , and to District or Seller, as the case may be, all other documents or instruments which are to be delivered to them. In the event the escrow terminates as provided herein, Escrow Holder shall return all monies , documents or other things of value deposited in the escrow to the party depositing the same . 4 . Rights and Liabilities of the Parties in the Event of Termina- tion. In the event this Agreement is terminated and escrow is cancelled for any reason, all parties shall be excused from any further obligations hereunder, except as otherwise provided herein. Upon any such termination of escrow, all parties hereto shall be jointly and severally liable to Escrow Holder for payment of its title and escrow cancellation charges (subject to rights of subrogation against any party whose fault may have caused such termination of escrow) , and each party expressly reserves any other rights and remedies which it may have against any other party by reason of a wrongful termination or failure to close escrow. 5. Leases or Occupancy of Premises . Seller warrants that there exist no oral or written leases oriental agreements affecting all or any portion of the Subject Property. Seller further warrants and agrees to hold District free and harmless and to reimburse District for any and all costs , liability, loss , damage or expense, including costs for legal services, occasioned by reason of any such lease or rental agreement of the Property being acquired by District, including, but not limited to, Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 4 claims for relocation benefits and/or payments pursuant to California Government Code Section 7260 et seq. Seller understands and agrees that the provisions of this paragraph shall survive the close of escrow and recordation of any Grant Deed (s) . 6. Seller ' s Representations and Warranties . For the purpose of consummating the sale and purchase of the Property in accordance herewith, Seller represents and warrants to District that as of the date this Agreement is fully executed and as of the date of Closing: 6 .01 Authority. Seller has the full right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform the transactions contemplated hereunder. 6 .02 Valid and Binding Agreements. This Agreement and all other documents delivered by Seller to District now or at the Closing have been or will be duly authorized and executed and delivered by Seller and do not violate any provisions of any agreement to which Seller is a party or by which Seller may be bound or any articles, bylaws or corporate resolutions of Seller. 6.03 Good Title. Seller warrants that there exist no recorded or unrecorded option rights or purchase rights to which Seller is a party. Escrow Holder' s willingness to issue its standard CLTA Policy of Title Insurance as of the Closing, insuring title to the Property in District in the amount of the Purchase Price, subject only to the exceptions provided in Section 3 (f) herein, shall constitute conclusive presumption of Seller ' s ability to convey title in condition acceptable to District. 7 . Integrity of Property. Except as otherwise provided herein or by express written permission granted by District, Seller shall not, between the time of Seller' s execution hereof and the close of escrow, cause or allow any physical changes on the Property. Such changes shall include but not be limited to grading, excavating or other earthmoving activities , cutting or removing trees , shrubs , brush or other vegetation, and damaging or demolition of improvements or structures on the Property. 8 . Hazardous Substances . "Hazardous substance" as used herein means and includes polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) , benzene, asbestos or any other substance the placement, storage or removal of which is pro- hibited or regulated by federal, state or local law. (a) Seller warrants and represents that: W To the actual knowledge of Seller, and during Seller' s ownership of the Property, Seller has not placed or stored or allowed to be placed or stored any hazardous substance on the Property, other than normal household supplies and paint, which Seller shall remove by Closing. Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 5 (ii) Seller has no knowledge of the presence of asbestos or benzene on the Property except as disclosed in the "Real Estate Transfer Disclosure Statement" which was delivered to District, as further provided in Section 15 herein. Seller has no knowledge of the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) on the Property except there may be such substances in the electrical transformers located on the Property. 9. Waiver of Statutory Compensation. Seller and District under- stand and agree that Seller may be entitled to receive the fair market value of the Property described in Exhibit "A" , as provided for by the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) the Uniform Relocation Act Amendments of 1987 (Public Law 100-17) , Title IV of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (101 Statutes, 246-256 , and California Government Code Section 7267 , and following. Seller hereby waives any and all existing and/or future rights Seller may have to the fair market value of said Property, appraisals , etc . , as provided for by said Federal Law and any corresponding California Government Code Sections . 10. Relocation - Knowing Waiver. As stated in the recitals herein- above, Seller has listed the Property for sale on the open market and as such, Seller acknowledges that he understands the relocation benefits and/or payments that may be available to him, including, but not limited to: relocation advisory assistance, rental differential payments , purchase differential payments, interest differential payments , reasonable moving expenses, self-move expenses , loss of tangible personal property, search expenses, in-lieu payment of business and/or farm relocation assistance; all pursuant to California Government Code Title 1 , Division 7 , Chapter 17 (Section 7260 et seq. ) ; and further, Seller acknowledges receiving the booklet entitled "Residential Relocation Assistance Program" from District, and Seller having read and understood said booklet, does hereby knowingly waive any and all of such relocation assistance and/or benefits that may be available to Seller (or those claiming through Seller) . 11 . Miscellaneous Realty Items Acquired. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the payment specified in Section 2 hereinabove includes , but is not limited to, payment for: a 2700 square-foot wood frame home, two barns , complete water system, wall- to-wall carpeting, window coverings, built-in appliances (dishwasher, garbage disposal , stove, and oven) , air heating and cooling system, septic system, solar hot water system, T.V. antenna, garage door openers , and all other improvements permanently attached or affixed to the buildings systems, and to the property which are being acquired by District as a part of this transaction. 12 . Holdover Tenancy. It is agreed that Seller shall vacate and deliver the house and the remainder of the property vacant upon Closing to District in good order and condition, without further notice, and immediately thereafter deliver the keys thereto to District and also pay Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 6 all closing utility bills up to and including the date of vacation; pro- vided, however that if Seller does not vacate the Property upon Closing, District agrees to rent the house and barns to Seller at the rate of Twenty-Five Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($2, 500 .00) per month for up to three (3) months using the District ' s standard form of Residential Rental Agreement, commencing the day following Closing. Any holdover by Seller beyond the end of said three (3) month period shall continue on a month- to-month basis; provided, however, that District shall be free to request that Seller vacate the premises at any time after said three (3) month period, or to increase the rent as District may see fit. 13. Maintenance. (a) The following systems are to be operative until District takes possession: (i) heating, cooling, plumbing, built-in appliances, electrical , sewer/septics, outside door locks and any other mechanical system presently installed on property; (ii) roof to be free of leaks except as set forth in the Real Estate Transfer Disclosure Statement as further provided in Section 15 hereinbelow; and (iii) broken or cracked glass to be replaced; provided, however, that any exceptions to this requirement are included and accepted by District as a part of the provisions of Section 15 herein. (b) Until District ' s possession, as further provided herein, Seller shall maintain the Property (including all buildings, grounds and landscaping) in the same general condition as of the date of acceptance of this Agreement by District. By said possession date, the Property is to be cleaned and free of all personal belongings and debris . (c) Should labor or materials be required to comply with any repair provisions of this Agreement, Seller agrees that all work shall be performed using good workmanship and with materials of comparable quality, in compliance with applicable Codes and Permits (where required) and completed prior to the Closing. 14 . Risk of Loss . Any risk of loss to the Property for any reason whatsoever shall be borne by Seller until title to said Property has been conveyed to District by recorded Deed; provided, however that Seller shall continue to be responsible for any risk of loss to the main house and adjacent other structures, for any reason whatsoever, during the period Seller remains on the premises in accordance with the provisions of Section 12 hereinabove. 15. Inspections and Disclosures. (a) Seller will provide District with a fully completed Real Estate Transfer Disclosure Statement, signed by Seller and the Real Estate Agent representing Seller no later than the date of delivery of this Agreement to District. Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 7 (b) Seller will provide District, no later than the date of delivery of this Agreement to District, with any and all previous inspection and/or analysis reports of Seller (e.g. , soils, geology, percolation, water and well tests , etc . ) , and a complete copy of the plans and specifications for all buildings and accouterments constructed on the Property by Seller. (c) Further, District will obtain all of the property inspec- tion reports reasonably required by District (e.g. , structural and pest control, roof , well and water system, solar system, septic system, foundation, heating, electrical, plumbing, etc . ) . (d) In consideration of Seller permitting District to conduct the inspections described in this Section 15 (c) , District, by undertaking such inspections, shall indemnity Seller from any damages, loss, or expense Seller may suffer or incur: (i) by reason of any mechanic's liens which attach to the Property as a result of such investigations, or (ii) which arise out of damage to the Property or injury to any person caused by such inspections . (e) Approval by District of this Agreement as provided in Section 17 herein, shall also be deemed to be acceptance and approval by District of all of such disclosures, inspections and said letter amendment hereto. 16 . Miscellaneous Provisions . 16 .01 Choice of Law. The internal laws of the State of California, regardless of any choice of law principles , shall govern the validity of this Agreement, the construction of its terms and the inter- pretation of the rights and duties of the parties . 16 .02 Attorneys ' Fees . If either party hereto incurs any expense, including reasonable attorneys ' fees, in connection with any action or proceeding instituted by reason of any default or alleged default of the other party hereunder, the party prevailing in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses and attorneys ' fees in the amount determined by the Court, whether or not such action or proceeding goes to final judgment. In the event of a settlement or final judgment in which neither party is awarded all of the relief prayed for, the prevailing party as determined by the Court shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses and attorneys ' fees . 16 .03 Amendment and Waiver. The parties hereto may by mutual written agreement amend this Agreement in any respect. Any party hereto may: M extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations of Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 8 the other party; (ii) waive any inaccuracies in representations and war- ranties made by the other party contained in this Agreement or in any documents delivered pursuant hereto; (iii) waive compliance by the other party with any of the covenants contained in this Agreement or the per- formance of any obligations of the other party; or (iv) waive the fulfill- ment of any condition that is precedent to the performance by such party of any of its obligations under this Agreement. Any agreement on the part of any party for any such amendment, extension or waiver must be in writing. 16 . 04 Rights Cumulative. Each and all of the various rights , powers and remedies of the parties shall be considered to be cumulative with and in addition to any other rights , powers and remedies which the parties may have at law or in equity in the event of the breach of any of the terms of this Agreement. The exercise or partial exercise of any right, power or remedy shall neither constitute the exclusive election thereof nor the waiver of any other right, power or remedy available to such party. 16 . 05 Notices . All notices , consents , waivers or demands of any kind which either party to this Agreement may be required or may desire to serve on the other party in connection with this Agreement shall be in writing and may be delivered by personal service or sent by tele- graph or cable or sent by registered or certified mail , return receipt requested, with postage thereon fully prepaid. All such communications shall be addressed as follows : Seller: Jan M. Smith 2995 Woodside Road, Suite 400-369 Woodside, CA 94062 (415) 369-4654 Copy To: Frank A. Small, Esq. 285 Hamilton Avenue Fifth Floor Palo Alto, CA 94301-2501 (415) 328-7000 District : Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Old Mill Office Center Building C, Suite 135 201 San Antonio Circle Mountain View, CA 94040 Attn: Herbert Grench, General Manager (415) 949-5500 Copy To: Stanley R. Norton, Esq. 407 Sherman Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94306 (415) 324-1366 Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 9 If sent by telegraph or cable, a conformed copy of such telegraphic or cabled notice shall promptly be sent by mail (in the manner provided above) to the addressee. Service of any such communication made only by mail shall be deemed complete on the date of actual delivery as shown by the addressees ' s registry or certification receipt or at the expiration of the third Ord) business day after the date of mailing, whichever is earlier in time. Either party hereto may from time to time, by notice in writing served upon the other as aforesaid, designate a different mailing address or a different person to which such notices or demands are there- after to be addressed or delivered. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall excuse either party from giving oral notice to the other when prompt notification is appropriate, but any oral notice given shall not satisfy the requirement of written notice as provided in this Section. 16.06 Severability. If any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be void or unenforceable by or as a result of a determination of any court of competent jurisdiction, the decision of which is binding upon the parties , the parties agree that such determination shall not result in the nullity or unenforceability of the remaining portions of this Agreement. The parties further agree to replace such void or unenforceable provisions which will achieve, to the extent possible, the economic, business and other purposes of the void or unenforceable provisions . 16 . 07 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed as an original , and when executed, separately or together, shall constitute a single original instrument, effective in the same manner as if the parties had executed one and the same instrument. 16 . 08 Waiver. No waiver of any term, provision or condition of this Agreement, whether by conduct or otherwise, in any one or more instances , shall be deemed to be, or be construed as , a further or continuing waiver of any such term, provision or condition or as a waiver of any other term, provision or condition of this Agreement. 16 . 09 Entire Agreement. This Agreement is intended by the parties to be the final expression of their agreement; it embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto; it consti- tutes a complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions thereof , and it supersedes any and all prior correspondence, conversa- tions , negotiations , agreements or understandings relating to the same subject matter. 16 .10 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of each provision of this Agreement in which time is an element. Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 10 16 . 11 Survival of Covenants . All covenants of District or Seller which are expressly intended hereunder to be performed in whole or in part after the Closing, and all representations and warranties by either party to the other, shall survive the Closing and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective parties hereto and their respective heirs , successors and permitted assigns . Any action by District against Seller for a breach of any representations or warranties made in this Agreement must be commenced, if at all, within 12 months of the Closing. 16 . 12 Assignment. Except as expressly permitted herein, neither party to this Agreement shall assign its rights or obligations under this Agreement to any third party without the prior written approval of the other party. 16 . 13 Further Documents and Acts . Each of the parties hereto agrees to execute and deliver such further documents and perform such other acts as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate to consummate and carry into effect the transactions described and contemplated under this Agreement. 16 .14 Binding on Successors and Assigns . This Agreement and all of its terms , conditions and covenants are intended to be fully effective and binding, to the extent permitted by law, on the successors and permitted assigns of the parties hereto. 16 .15 Captions . Captions are provided herein for convenience only and they form no part of this Agreement and are not to serve as a basis for interpretation or construction of this Agreement, nor as evidence of the intention of the parties hereto. 16 .16 Pronoun References . In this Agreement, if it be appro- priate, the use of the singular shall include the plural , and the plural shall include the singular, and the use of any gender shall include all other genders as appropriate. 16 . 17 Estimates of Size. The statements made in Section 1 relating to the approximate acreage of the Property and in Section 11 relating to the approximate square footage of the improvements are made on the basis of the District ' s estimates which were obtained by the District from sources other than Seller. Seller makes no representations as to the accuracy of these statements . 16 . 18 Like Kind Exchange. District understands that Seller intends to effect a like kind exchange (including the possibility of a simultaneous or a delayed "Starker" exchange) , pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, of the Property for other property to be designated by Seller. District agrees to cooperate with Seller to effect Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 11 such exchange by performing all acts necessary therefor, excluding, with- out limitation, taking title to the exchange property; provided, however, that District shall not be obligated to incur any additional expense in connection with the performance of its obligations under this Section 16.18. 16.19 Broker' s Commission. Included in the amount payable under Section 2 hereinabove, a real estate agent' s commission in the amount of Forty-Two Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($42,000.00) , which is three percent (3%) of the Purchase Price, shall be paid at Closing to Cornish & Carey Real Estate Company by the Escrow agent. No other such commission is due or payable by District and the parties agree to and do hereby indemnify and hold the other party harmless from and against any and all costs, liabilities, losses, damages, claims, causes of action or proceedings which may result from any broker, agent or finder, licensed or otherwise, claiming through, under or by reason of the conduct of the other party in connection with this transaction. 17. Acceptance. Provided that this Agreement is signed by Seller and returned to District on or before November 2, 1989 District shall have until midnight November 8, 1989 to accept and execute this Agreement and during said period this instrument shall constitute an irrevocable offer by Seller to sell and convey the Property to District for the considera- tion and under the terms and conditions herein set forth. As considera- tion for the tender of said offer, District has paid and Seller acknowl- edges receipt of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10-00) . Provided that this Agreement is accepted by District, this transaction shall close as soon as practicable in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein. Purchase Agreement - Smith Page 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the date of final execution by District in accordance with the terms hereof . I MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE SELLER DISTRICT APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jk M. Sm th Z4 • Date : OCT - - i989 Stanley Nor on, District Counsel /�`� G' -\ Af.EPTED FOR RECOMMENDATION: Cornish & Carey Real Estate L.-Craig Brittont�SR/WA' Company Land Acquisition Manager � s APPROVED AND ACCEPTED: B:y-�'" LaNell immac Associate Broker and Listing Agent ! President, Board of Directors Date : ATTEST: District Clerk Date : Order No . 347533 PRELIMINARY REPORT FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 555 Marshall Street Redwood City, CA 94064 (415) 367-9050 MID-PENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Attn: Sandy Voorhes 201 San Antonio Circle , C-135 Mountain View , CA 94040 Customer 's Reference : Form of Policy Coverage Requested : ALTA OWNERS POLICY 1987 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS and ALTA LOAN POLICY - 1987 In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance , this Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue , or cause to be issued , as of the date hereof , a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance , describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth , insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect , lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules , Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms . The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached . Copies of the Policy forms should be read . They are available from the office which issued this report . This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a Policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby . If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance , a Binder or Commitment should be requested . Dated as of March 15 , 1989 at 7 : 30 a .m. JAMFS NORRIS ESCROW OFFICER Title of said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in : JAN M. SMITH, a single man Page I EXHIBIT Page I of Order No . 347533 The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or - referred to covered by this Report is : A FEE as to Parcel I ; AN EASEMENT as to Parcels II & III . The land referred to in this Report is situated in the State of California , County of San Mateo , and is described as follows : PARCEL I : All that certain real property situate in the County of San Mateo , State of California , being a portion of Section 7 and Section 8 , Township 7 South , Range 3 West , Mount Diablo Base & Meridian , more particularly described as follows : BEGINNING at a point in the centerline of the survey of the California State Highway Road IV , San Mateo County Route 55 , Section D , commonly known as Skyline Boulevard , said point of beginning being at Station 237+70 .70 of said survey; thence following along the centerline of said highway South 65* 01 ' East 365 .02 feet , more or less , to Station 241+35 .72 B . C. the along the arc of a tangent curve to the right , having a central angle of 300 45 ' 00" , a radius of 1200 .00 feet and a length of 644 .03 feet to Station "P" 247+79 .75 P .C.C . ; thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a central angle of 37* 55 ' 00" , a radius of 500 .00 feet and a length of 330 .89 feet to Station "P" 251+10 .64 E . C _ = "A" 251+90 -00 P .O.T . ; thence South 3* 39 ' 00" West 1031 . 18 feet ; thence along the arc of a tangent curve to the left , having a central angle of 52* 31 ' 16" , a radius of 300 -00 feet and a length of 275 .00 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence from said true point of beginning , returning Northwesterly and Northerly along said centerline of Skyline Blvd . along said last mentioned curve having a radius of 300 .00 feet , thru a central angle of 52* 311 16" an arc distance of 275 .00 feet and North i* 39 ' East 41 . 18 feet ; thence leaving the centerline of said Road North 75* 13 ' West 1365 .00 feet ; thence North 4* 33 ' 001, West 650 .00 feet ; thence North 7* 16 ' 00" East 160 .00 feet and North 14* 00 ' 001, West 200 .00 feet , more or less , to a point in the Southeasterly line of a 30 foot wide strip of land known as Rapley Ranch Road , the centerline of which is described in the Dead from San Mateo County Title Company , a corporation to Elizabeth Moody Williams , at al , recorded June 28 , 1941 in Volume 957 of official Records at page 500 under File No . 24843-E , Records of San Mateo County , California ; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly boundary line of said 30 foot strip for a distance of 930 feet , more or less , to a direct line drawn between the quarter section corner on the East line of Section 7 , Township 7 South , Range 3 West , and the Northwest corner of the Page 2 EXHIBIT Page Order No . 347533 Southwest 1 /4 of the Northeast 1 /4 of said Section 7 ; thence Southeasterly along said las t mentioned line for a distance of 350 feet , more or less , to said quarter section corner on the East line of said Section 7 ; thence South along said East line for a distance of 1160 feet , more or less , to the centerline of a Pacific Gas and Electric Co . Easement recorded in Book 2517 of Official Records at page 275 , Records of San Mateo County , California ; thence along said centerline South 61 * 37 ,East 580 feet , more or less , to a point thereon which bears South 70* 10 ' West from the true point of beginning of this description ; thence North 700 10 ' East 1650 feet , more or less , to the true point of beginning . EXCEPTING FROM the property herein described , so much thereof lying within the bounds of State Highway Road IV, San Mateo County Route 55 , Section "D" , commonly known as Skyline Boulevard ; said Skyline Boulevard including the lands described in , but not limited to the following : 1 . Lands described in Deed to the State of California , recorded an September 30 , 1929 in Book 431 of official Records at page 474 (File No . 44657-B) , Records of San Mateo County, California . 2 . Lands described in Parcel I of that certain Dead to the State of California , recorded on October 31 , 1932 in Book 579 of Official Records at page 179 (File No. 16051 -C) , Records of San Mateo County , California . PARCEL II : A non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over the portion of said Rapley Ranch Road lying between the Southwesterly line of Skyline Boulevard and the Northwesterly prolongation of the Southwesterly boundary of Parcel I above . Said easement is appurtenant to Parcel I above and was created by Deed to Joseph Galantine recorded September 26 , 1942 in Book 1036 of official Records at page 229 (File No . 64606-E) , Records of San Mateo County , California . PARCEL III : A non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress and common driveway purposes over the real property described as Parcel "C" as shown on that certain map entitled "PARCEL. MAP FOR A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 6 , T.7S , R.3W, M.D .B. &M- as described in Volume 6404 , page 86 , official Records of San Mateo Co. San Mateo County , California" , filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California an June 26 , 1978 in Book 42 of Parcel Maps at page 55 , being a strip of land 24 ft . wide , lying equally on each side of the following described centerline : Page 3 B IT Page 4wof A Order No . 347533 BEGINNING at a point on the Westerly line of said Parcel "C" distant thereon North 4* 33 ' West 178 .50 ft . from Southwest corner of said Parcel "C" : thence from said point of beginning North 37* 22 ' East 12 feet ; thence North 16* 10 ' East 12 feet ; thence North 1 * 28 ' East 12 feet ; thence North 20* 01 ' West 12 feet ; thence North 31 * 09 ' West 11 feet ; and thence North 47* 061 West 8 .54 feet to the Westerly line of said Parcel "C" . The sidelines of said strip of land to be lengthened or shortened so as to terminate at the Westerly line of said Parcel "C" . Said easement to be appurtenant to all and/or any portions of the lands conveyed to Grantee herein by Deed recorded on June 16 , 1975 in Book 6667 of official Records at page 525 (59003-AT ) . A .P . No . : 078-210-100 JPN 078 021 210 10 A 078-23.0-220 076 021 210 11 A At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions contained in said policy form would be as follows: 1 . General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1969-90 , now a lien , amount not yet ascertainable . 2 . General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1986-89 in the amount of $1 ,347 .03 , each installment , have been paid in full . Homeowners Exemption $7 ,000 .00 Code Area : 070-005 A .P . No. : 078-210-100 Affects a portion of land . General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988-89 in the amount of $205 .70 , each installment , have been paid in full . Code Area : 070-001 A .P . No . : 078-210-220 Affects a portion of land . 3 . The Lien of Supplemental Taxes assessed pursuant to Chapter 3 .5 , Commencing with Section 75 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code . 4 . EASEMENT for existing roads lying within the boundaries of property herein described . Page 4 I I Order No. 347533 5 . RIGHT OF WAY over the herein described property , as granted in Instrument : From: Robert Anderson and Gracella R . Anderson , husband and wife ' To : Pacific Gas and Electric Company , a corporation Dated : June 6 , 1932 Recorded : July 25 , 1932 Document No . : 11124-C Official Records at a e/image 197 , Records of Book/Reel �71 of Uf P g San Mateo County , California _ Grants Right of Way for a single line of poles and wires over the Easterly and Northeasterly portion of Parcel I . over the herein described property , as granted 6 . RIGHT OF WAY in Instrument : From : Joseph Galantine and Philimena Galantine , husband and wife To : Pacific Gas and Electric Company , a California corporation Recorded : December 28 , 1953 Document No . : 27108-L Book/Reel 2517 of official Records at page/image 275 , Records of San Mateo County , California . Grants Right of Way for line of towers and wires over a strip of land of the uniform width of 50 feet , crossing and along the Southwesterly boundary of the herein described property. 7 . RIGHT OF WAY as condemned by Final order of Condemnation dated May 16 , 1965 issued out of the Superior Court of the State of California , in and for the County of San Mateo #105155 entitled "Pacific Gas and Electric Company , Plaintiff and Cross- Defendant vs . John W. Dodds , et al , Defendants and Cross- Complainants" , a certified copy of which was recorded May 18 , 1965 in Book 4955 of Official Records at paEe 143 (File No . 50060-Y) , Records of San Mateo County , California . Condemns Right of Way for towers and wires affecting strips of variable width , on each side of Fright of Way shown on Exception 6 herein . 8 . TERMS AND PROVISIONS of that certain "Agreement " By : Donald A . Williams and Nona Williams , his wife , as Joint Tenants and Between : Jan HooEland and Trip Hoogland , his wife , as Joint Tenants Dated : August 8 , 1973 Recorded : August 24 , 1973 Document No . : 68580-AG Book/Reel 6 457 of official Records at page/image 654 , Records of San Mateo County , California . Page c� r� Page 19.f =—� Order No. 347533 9 . EASEMENT over the herein described property , as granted in Deed : From : Jan M. Smith , a single man To : Pacific Gas and Electric Company , a California corporation Dated : September 6 , 1977 Recorded : September 23 , 1977 Document No. : 76008-AL Book/Reel 7611 of Official Records at page/image 159 , Records of San Mateo County , California . Grants Easement for public utilities and appurtenances by Document entitled "Notice of Final Description" . Affects a strip of land of the uniform width of 10 feet the centerline of which is delineated by the heavy dashed line shown upon the print of Pacific 's Drawing No . SJB 1390 attached thereto and made a part thereof . Reference is made to the Document for full particulars . Said Document further recites , first party shall not erect construct an building or other structure or drill or operate or g Y any well within said strips of land . 10 . ANY AND ALL subsisting leases . There have been no deeds recorded within the last two years prior to the date of this report , affecting the herein described property . NOTE: This report is subject to a cancellation charge as required by Sections 12404 , et seq. , of the Insurance Code of the State of California and Rule No. 2 of Department of Insurance Bulletin No. Ns . 35 E. ORDER DATE : March 20 , 1989 S .T.R. DATE: None DP/am/PMAR Page 6 ti . Page ©fad TAX CODE AREA '. 78-2 1 �• I DC. ,�Ems-. eK'B O \ ~ PARCEL A vj'• 17 P7 y K_ j At00 .•�ba:Jr 1/ ;GCa C K�if EL S � V $ OR UTIV ;'. s � 1M6 reap is lur"Ishod without I,abili I BK-BO as 10 its accuracy,and its s ry sole purpose ,,,�,� is for the convenience of location o1 r v- .�' the propeny in question. _ o 10 4 r� i �-`� li \ OG k l kk sari./r v.� •� S. it 40 •'arr. �!�' ; 7 B sro r nsr 1 . w _ ► SCHOOL DISTRICT _. I8 I l7 BO J) r v •+' �,.- �`TLtR 7Gf7�t7� f�ALLEp. C0 SA TEO� CAL/ 80' ' ..,r��'�" 4. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY-1970 WITH A.L.T.A.E ,SEMENT FORM I COVERAGE(AMENDED 10-17 SC DOLE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE i. Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances)restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy,use or enjoyment ofthe land,or regulating the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land,or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimen- sions or area of the land,or the effect of any violation of any such low ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public retards at Dote of Policy. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters(a) created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;(b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the dote such insured claimant became on insured hereunder;(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Dote of Policy). 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of failure of the insured at Date of Policy or of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness to comply with applicable"doing business'laws of the state in which the land is situated. S. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY- 1970(AMENDED 10-17-70) WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association Lenders Policy is used as o Standard Coverage Policy and not os on Extended Coverage Policy,the exclusions set Forth in porogroph 4 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the matters shown in parts one and two following: Port One: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts,rights,interests,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by on inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which ore not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpotented mining claims;reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights,claims or title to water. 6. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY- 1987 WITH A.L.T.A.ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE(6/87) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: " 1. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a r h effect f n violation of these laws ordinances or I i r w apart;or iv environmentalprotection,o t e e ec o a , h n in the or orea of the land or on parcel of which the and s o as o a change e ( ) Y 9Y P P governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violo- tion or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Dote of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters: (a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Dote of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the dote the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services,labor or material or the extent insurance is off orded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at date of policy);or (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant hod paid value for th4insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Polidl,orthe inabilty orfailure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable"doing business'laws of the state in which the land is situated. o' 5. Invalidity or unenforceo6iliy of the lien of the insured mortgage,or claim thereof,which arises out of the transoction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services,labor or materials(or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services,lo6oror materials over the lien of the insured mortgage)arising from an improve- ment or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY- 1987(6/87) WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS i When the American Lond Title Association policy is used os o Standard Coverage Policy and not as on Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set Forth in parogroph 6 above;4 and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. (continued on back) EX H I B 1-1 �-- Page of.� SCHEDULES This policy does not insure against loss or damoy the Company will not pay costs,attorneys fees or expen iich arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which ore not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments,or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which ore not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims;reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights,claims or title to water. 6. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by low and not shown by the public records. S. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY- 1987(6/87) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters ore expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or (iv) environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these lows,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from oviolation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a viola- tion or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Dote of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Dote of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred - prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters: (a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant become an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 9. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER POLICY- 1987(6/87) WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not os on Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 8 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULES This policy does not insured against loss or damage(and the Company will not pay costs,attorneys'fees or expenses)which arise by reason of: Part One: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts,rights,interests,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by on inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,encroachments,or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims;reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights,claims or title to water. 6. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by low and not shown by the public records. 10. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY- 1937 EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule 8,you are not insured against loss,costs,attorneys'fees and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power,and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation.This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: • land use • land division • improvements on the land • environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Dote. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it,unless: • a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Dote • the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the fond without knowing of the taking 3. Title Risks: • that ore created,allowed,or agreed to by you • that ore known to you,but not to us,on the Policy Dote-unless they appeared in the public records • that result in no loss to you • that first affect your title after the Policy Date-this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 5. Lock of a right: EXHIBIT • to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A,or , 0 • in streets,alleys,or waterways that touch your land - Page This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. EXHIBIT A LIST OF PRINTED ' EPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (By 'cy Type) 1. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY-(7-88 SCHEDULE 8 EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage(and the Company will not pay costs,attorneys fees or expenses)which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts,rights,interests or cicims which ore not shown by the public records butwhich could be ascertained by on inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in posses- sion thereof. 3. Easements,liens or encumbrances,or claims thereof,which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in areo,.encroochments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which ore not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpotented mining claims;(b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;(c) water rights,claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a),(b),or(c)are shown by the public records. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a)Any low,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of ony improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or o change in the dimensi ns orarea of the I nd or any par eel of which the I nd is or w s a pa t• r(iv)environmental pr tecfi n ,or the effect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that o notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from o violotion or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Dote of Policy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from o violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Polity which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters: (a)whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant become an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not hove been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Dote of Policy,or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebted- ness,to comply with the applicable"doing business"laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceobility of the lien of the insured mortgage,or claim thereof,which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending low. 2. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B- 1970(AMENDED 10-17-70) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Anylow,ordinance orgovernmentcl regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances)restricting or regulating or prohibiting Ike occupancy,use or enjoyment of the land,or regulating the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land,or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimen- sions of area of the land,or the effect of any violation of any such law,ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters(a) created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant,(b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest by this policy and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant become on insured hereunder;(c) resulting in no loss ordomoge to the insured claimant;(d) attaching or created subse- quent to Dote of Policy;or(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant hod paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 3. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B-1970(AMENDED 10-17-70) WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as on Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 2 above ore used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE b This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the matters shown in ports one and two following: Part One 1. Taxes or assessments which ore not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts,rights,interests,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by on inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies,conflicts in boundary tines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and whi ' eHtgs19JnTy p hiecords. 5. Unpotented mining claims;reservations or exceptions in patents orin Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights,claims or title to waterwa ''a yA Ot 6. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public recor s. l AA. R-89-149 VL of (Meeting 89-28 1414bi November 8 , 1989) dh W MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT November 3 , 1989 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: Property Tax Allocation From Proposed Redwood City Redevelopment Project Recommended Action: Adopt the attached Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Electing to Receive Incremental Property Tax Revenues as Provided for by Section 33676 of the California Health and Safety Code. Discussion: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redwood City proposes to add additional territory to its Redevelopment Project No. 2 (see attached letter and map) . I have been involved in review of the Draft Environmental Impact Report and in meeting with the Fiscal Review Committee, a committee of representatives of the affected agencies . Under state redevelopment law, the District' s annual property tax income from the amendment area (its "base") would be frozen during the 38-year lifetime of the project at the fiscal year 1989-1990 amount that is estimated at $58 , 000 unless you either: 1) elect by resolution to receive a two percent annual increase in this property tax income, or 2) enter into an agreement with the agency to receive all or part of the District ' s share of the increment, plus the base. I have entered into negotiations with agency officials in order to try to obtain a portion of the increment. In the meantime, passage of the resolution will assure that the District will at least receive the two percent annual increase. Using agency estimates of the growth of assessed value in the amended area, the District would receive $2, 219, 000 over the lifetime of the project if there were no growth in the District ' s share; $3, 342, 000 if there were two percent growth; $4, 065, 000 if, for example, the District were to receive its base plus 40% of its contribution to the increment; and $6 , 834, 000 if the District received its base plus 100 percent of its contribution to the increment. These figures translate to net present values of $770, 000 , $998 , 000 , $1, 118 , 000 , and $1 , 639 , 000 respectively, at a seven percent discount rate. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF NOW THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY Bitv08iffornia FONDMId M81 October 27, 1989 Mr. H. Grench Board of Directors Mid Peninsula Regional Open Space District Certified 201 San ANtonio Circle Mt. View, CA. 94090 SUBJECT: NOTICE TO TAXING AGENCIES Dear Mr. H. Grench: The City Council of the City of Redwood City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redwood City will conduct a joint public hearing on the proposed Second Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Redwood City Redevelopment Project No. 2. The public hearing will be held on Monday, November 20, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. in the San Mateo County Board of Supervisor's Chambers, located at 401 Marshall Street, Redwood City, California. Enclosed with this letter is the notice of public hearing along with a map showing the existing Redevelopment Project boundary and proposed Amendment Area. If you would like additional information relative to the proposed Second Amendment, please call me at (415) 780-7292, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, MICHAEL CHURCH Executive Director MC/rk Encl : Notice of joint public hearing P.O. BOX 391 REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA 94064 TEL (415) 780-7291 FAX NUMBER (415) 780-7225 FIGURE 3 EXISTING AND PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT AREAS '� whrpple qq 4� o .c .. � . ..•.• ��� . LEGEND a�:::•��:= wsrar` I _ Existing , Redevelopment Sub-areas .•' j, Amendment Area O / Boundary Maple Street •� —\ - Chestnut Street.! j I, c79 ' ass"'►': _ Charter Street �•���/- M o' zoo' soo• t000' Scale Source: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redwood City 3-4 R-89-153 (Meeting 89-28 November 8 , 1989) *am 0 dim MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT October 31, 1989 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager RESPONSIBILITY AND PREPARATION: C. Britton, Land Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: Proposed Addition to Rules of Procedure to Enable General Manager to Accept the Acquisition of Minor Interests in and Easements Upon Land Recommended Action: Adopt the accompanying Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Amending Rules of Procedure. Discussion: Since the District ' s inception in 1972 , over 31 , 000 acres of open space land have been acquired from 233 grantors. As a result, the District ' s acquisition files contain information on a myriad of title encumbrances , easements, reservations , leases , and rights that third parties hold or claim to hold in District lands . One of the long-term goals of the open space acquisition program is to research, and where appropriate and cost-effective , to pursue orderly disposition of encum- brances such as : mineral and water rights , abandoned easements , expired leases , timber rights , claims of prescriptive easements , and other rights that may be detrimental to the open space character of the land. At times during the research process , it is also discovered that previously unknown parties may have a potential claim to a minor fee interest in open space land that would be desirable for the District to acquire, if possible. Currently, if staff is able to obtain a deed, release, quitclaim deed, or other instrument to eliminate the effect of such an encumbrance or extinguish a potential minor fee title claim, it is necessary to prepare a report and appropriate resolution for Board consideration and approval to acquire or receive such minor interests in land. The potential volume of these transactions , coupled with the nominal value involved, necessitates the consideration of a procedure that would permit the General Manager to approve the acquisition of minor interests in and easements upon land and also, in accordance with California law, would allow the General Manager to execute a certificate of acceptance for acquisition of minor interests in or easement upon real property. This would be accomplished by recordation of a general resolution of the Board of Directors . R-89-153 Page two Several safeguards are built into this proposed procedure: 1) Only minor interests in and easements upon real property could be acquired and accepted by the General Manager. 2) Expenditures for the acquisition of such minor interests would be limited to the General Manager' s authority as provided in Section 5549 (b) of the Public Resources Code and as approved by the Board of Directors. 3) The General Manager would report all of such acquisitions to the Board of Directors within a reasonable period of time of the action or proposed action. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT AMENDING RULES OF PROCEDURE The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does hereby resolve to amend the Rules of Procedure by adding Section 2.60 as follows: Certificates of Acceptance. In accordance with Government Code Section 27281, Certificates of Acceptance for deeds or grants conveying any interest in or easement upon real estate to the District for public purposes shall be executed as follows : (1) The President of the Board of Directors or other appropriate officer is hereby authorized to consent and accept on behalf of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District deeds or grants conveying any interest in or easement upon real property to the District for public purposes and to execute a Certificate of Acceptance as evidence thereof as required by law, or (2) The General Manager is hereby authorized to approve the acquisition of a minor interest in or easement upon real property and accept on behalf of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District deeds or grants conveying any such minor interest in or easement upon real property to the District for public purposes and to execute a Certificate of Acceptance as evidence thereof as required by law, subject to the following: a) The General Manager finds that the acquisition of such minor interest in or easement upon real property is consistent with District policy; and b) The cost does not exceed the General Manager ' s authority as provided in Section 5549 (b) of the Public Resources Code and as approved by the Board of Directors from time to time; and c) The General Manager informs the Board of Directors of the action or proposed action within a reasonable period of time. f AL R-89-152 VL (Meeting 89-28 'q0,610e November 8 , 1989) MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REPORT October 30, 1989 TO: Board of Directors FROM: H. Grench, General Manager SUBJECT: Rescheduling of November 22 Regular Meeting to November 29 Recommended Action: Reschedule the November 22 regular meeting to Wednesday, November 29. Discussion: Your second regular meeting in November falls on the evening preceding Thanksgiving Day. According to Section 1 . 10 of your Rules of Procedures , the meeting is to be rescheduled or cancelled. A second meeting in November is necessary. I recommend that the November 22 meeting be rescheduled to Wednesday, November 29 at 7 : 30 P.M. I I I -- Clams No. 8y 24 Meeting 89-33 Date: Dec. 20, '1989 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REVISED 4 Amount Name Description 3474 '157.00 American Red Cross Rental of CPR Materials 3475 '16.05 Annex Printing Center Typesetting 3476 38.00 Brian Kangas Foulk Engineering Services 3477 213.75 Butler's Uniforms Uniform Expense 3478 266.89 California Water Service Company Water Service 3479 45.65 Clark's Auto Parts Parts and Repairs 3480 332.84 Conney Safety Products First Aid Supplies 3481 28.96 Contemporary Engraving Nameplates 3482 109.00 The Country Almanac Advertisement 3483 147.72 Crest Copies, Inc. Biuelines 3484 45.26 Alice Cummings Reimbursement--Resource Materials 3485 617. 16 The Darkroom Color Slides and Enlargements 3486 350.00 Dana Property Analysis Appraisal Services 3487 486.52 Jack Dymond Associates Electrical Modificatio-is 3488 84.03 Farrelle Communications Radio Repairs 3489 285.23 Foster Bros. Security Systems Locks and Keys 3490 1 ,055.00 Geoffrey Graves House Repairs 3491 288.77 Mary Hale Reimbursement--Conference Committee Meet i n g 3492 210.00 Frank Isidoro Erosion Control 3493 76.27 Langley Hill terry Base Rock 3494 40.00 Las Palmas Pool Service Pool Maintenance 3495 1 ,285.95 Lawrence Tire Service Tires 3496 285.00 Los Altos Garbage Company Dumpster Rental 3497 70.00 Los Altos Medical Clinic Pre-Employment Physical 3498 404.75 McCracken, Byers & Martin Legal Services 3499 60. 17 McGraw-Hill Book Company Resource Documents 3500 378.34 Minton's Lumber & Supply Field Supplies 3501 38.90 Moore Medical Corporation Safety Supplies 3502 '102.00 Miunday & Collins Equipment Rental 3503 335.93 The Office Club Office Supplies 3504 737.95 Orchard Supply Hardware Field Supplies 3505 1 ,078.53 Pacific Bell Telephone Service 3506 555.02 Pacific Gas & Electric Company Utilities 3507 200.30 Pine Cone Lumber Company, Inc. Lumber 3508 '172.61 Pioneer Sales & Service Company Equipment Rental 3509 340.26 PIP Printing Brochure Printing 3510 46.66 Pitney Bowes Maintenance Agreement 3511 50.00 Port-o-Let Sanitation Services 3512 3.00 Rancho Cobbler & Cleaners Uniform Expense 42G.00 Vicki Reeder Consulting Services 3513 9 3514 5,750.00 Robert C. Reese & Associates Appraisal Services 3515 236.88 Scotts Valley Sprinkler & Pipe Pipe Fittings 3516 681-.62 Signs of the Times Signs 3517 150.00 Stanford Energy Systems Inspection Report 3518 379.10 The Times Tribune Advertisement 3519 1 ,500.00 The Trail Center Trail Constructioi 3520 1 ,749.00 Trygg & Trygg Design and Layout 3521 625.98 Unocal Fuel and Repairs 3522 672.91 Uno Graphics Brochure Printing Claims No. 89-24 Meeting 89-33 Date: Dec. 20, 1Q8Q MlDPENINSUL4 REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT REVISED # Amount Name Description -- 3523 324.50 U. S. Rentals Equipment Rental 2524 378'97 Whitmore, Kay & Stevens Legal Services 3525 129,124,12 WSP Trucking, Inc. Skyline Ridge Development Project 3526 353'10 The Workingman's Emporium Uniform Expense 3527 422'05 Yardbfrd Equipment Sales Supplies and Repairs 3528 5'000'00 Ralph' Wm. & Deborah A. 8otsch Property Option 3529 134,357'44 Western Farm Credit Bank Land Bank Payment 3530 51 '00 County of San Mateo Court Documents 3531 251 '67 Petty Cash Photo Reproduction, Local and Out-of-Town Business Meetings, Subscriptions, Offic Supplies and Private Vehicle Expense * Emergency Wire Transfer made on December 15' 1989' �*Emergenoy Check Issued on December 15. 1989' � � � � � � � � � � Claims No. 89-24 Meeting 89-33 Date: Dec. 20, Amount MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTR Name T 3523 3524 3525 3526 3527 324.50 378.97 129,124.12 353.10 422.06 U. S. Rentals Whitmore, Kay & Stevens WSP Trucking, Inc. The Workingman's Emporium Yardbird Equipment Sales Equipment Rental Legal Services Skyline Ridge Development Project Uniform Expense Supplies and Repairs