HomeMy Public PortalAbout2019-12-05 packet
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats
as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Technical Committee
Thursday, December 5, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.
Meeting Location: Boone/Bancroft Room # 200, John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 - Enter through Main Lobby
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
2. Public comment
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of October 3, 2019
5. Communication Received
6. New Business
A. Title VI Program – DRAFT
Action Requested: Review and discussion
Staff Report: Recipients of Federal Transit Administration funding are federally required to report certain
general information to determine compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As a recipient,
CAMPO is required to update the Title VI Program every three years. See the attached staff report and
draft Title VI Program for more detail.
7. Other Business
A. Status of Current Work T asks
B. Election of Officers
C. Adoption of 2020 Meeting Schedule
D. Member Updates
8. Next Meeting Date – Thursday, January 2, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room #200
9. Adjournment
Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.64 57
MINUTES
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
October 3, 2019
VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT
Cole County: Larry Benz
Eric Landwehr
Jefferson City: David Bange, Vice Chairman
Matt Morasch
Eric Barron
Mark Mehmert
Britt Smith
MoDOT: Kim Tipton, Designee for Steve Engelbrecht
Bob Lynch
Wardsville: Paul Stonner
Private Transportation Interest: Joe Scheppers
Pedestrian or Biking Interest: Cary Maloney
VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT
Paul Winkelmann, Callaway County
JJ Gates, Jefferson City
Sonny Sanders, Chairman, Jefferson City
Mark Tate, Holts Summit
Mike Henderson, MoDOT
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration
Jeremiah Shuler, Federal Transit Administration
STAFF PRESENT (Non-Voting)
Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner
Anne Stratman, Neighborhood Services Specialist
GUESTS PRESENT
Tim Oligschlaeger, MoDOT
Julie Stotlemeyer, MoDOT
Joanie Prenger, MoDOT
Jennifer Bowden, Mid Missouri Regional Planning Commission
Lauren Paulwell, FHWA
Presentation: ADA Transition Plans for Right-Of-Way by Julie Stotlemeyer, P.E., Assistant State Design
Engineer, MoDOT Central Office Design
Ms. Stotlemeyer gave a presentation on the followi ng discussion topics: (1) What is ADA; (2) LPA Responsibilites;
(3) What is a self-evaluation; (4) What is a transition plan; (5) How do I get started; (6) Projects and effect on ADA;
and (7) Resources available.
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
Mr. Bange called the meeting to order at 10:41 a.m. and asked Ms. Stratman to call roll. A quorum of 12
voting members or their designee was present.
2. Public comment
None received.
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed unanimously.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
October 3, 2019 Page 2
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of May 2, 2019
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of August 1, 2019 as
written. The motion passed unanimously.
5. Communications from the presiding officer
A. ONE DOT & Governor Approval of TIP Amendment #1
6. New Business
A. MoDOT request for functional class change to Routes M & W at the intersection with Route B in
Wardsville.
Ms. Williams explained that during MoDOT’s July 2019 travel way maintenance, line work was adjusted
on Route B at the intersection of Route B, Route M, and Route W in Cole County. The major collector
functional classification has been moved to the new location. One section of the old location was renamed
Route M and another section was renamed Route W. At least one section should retain the major collector
functional classification for connectivity of the major collector currently on R oute M and the section we
selected had the higher AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic) count. Staff is seeking a Technical
Committee recommendation for approval to the Board of Directors.
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to forward the functional class change request to the Board of
Directors for approval. The motion passed unanimously.
7. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects. Staff has assembled the document and it is posted to the
CAMPO website at www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo.
911 Assistance. Jefferson City/Cole County 911 is in the process of updating dispatch software.
CAMPO staff is providing technical assistance with adjustments to the GIS ro ad network.
Federal Performance Measures. Staff continues collaborating with MODOT staff concerning
various federal performance measures required by MAP -21 and the FAST Act.
Jefferson City Data Assistance. Staff is working with other Jefferson City planners in providing data
and mapping assistance in the update of the of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Title VI Program update (including Public Participation Plan, Limited English Proficiency).
Staff is working on the combined update of all of these plans. These required products will be updated
with stakeholder and public input. The documents are excepted to be completed by February 2020.
Major Thoroughfare Plan Development. Staff is developing a process for creation of a Major
Thoroughfare Plan. The Major Thoroughfare Plan will be developed through stakeholder input and
will pull directly from the recently completed Travel Demand Model.
B. Member Updates
Jefferson City
--Mr. Bange gave an update on the following: (1) Dunklin Street Bridge replacement and corridor
project; and (2) E. High Street curb, gutter and sidewalk project
--Mr. Smith gave an update on the overlay project
--Mr. Mehmert announced that October 14 is the Ride the Bus Free Day
--Mr. Barron gave an update on the City’s Comprehensive Plan Update
Cole County
--Mr. Landwehr gave an update on the following: (1) Tanner Bridge Road safety improvement pr oject;
(2) South Brook stormwater project; and (3) Business 50 West Phase 2 Project
MoDOT
--Ms. Tipton gave a report on the Governor’s Cost Share Program
--Mr. Lynch gave the following updates: (1) Dix Road improvement project; and (2) Route 50 outer
road resurfacing project
Pedestrian or Biking Interest
--Mr. Maloney gave an update on the Recreational Trail Project at Binder Lake
Mr. Smith left at 10:54 a.m.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
October 3, 2019 Page 3
8. Next Meeting Date - Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room.
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 11:00 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Anne Stratman, Neighborhood Services Specialist
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Title VI P rogram
Pending Approval by the CAMPO Board of Directors
February XX, 2020
The preparation of this plan was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal
Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusion s expressed in
this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of
Transportation.
CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from participation in, be
denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the grounds of race, col or, sex, age,
disability or national origin, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259).
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634 -6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
MPO Administration is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services/ Planning Division
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty Jefferson City, Missouri
Telephone 573-634-6410
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
Resolution Adopting the Program
Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1
Organization ..................................................................................................................... 1
Program Requirements Applicable to CAMPO ..................................................................... 2
General Requirements (Chapter III).................................................................................. 4
Title VI Annual Certification and Assurances .......................................................................... 4
Title VI Notice to the Public ................................................................................................. 4
Title VI Complaint Procedures ............................................................................................. 5
Title VI Complaint Form ..................................................................................................... 5
List of Transit-Related Title VI Investigations, Complaints, and Lawsuits ..................................... 5
Public Participation Plan ..................................................................................................... 6
Language Assistance Plan ................................................................................................... 6
Committee Membership ..................................................................................................... 6
Requirements of MPOs (Chapter VI) .................................................................................. 7
Demographic Profile of the Metropolitan Planning Area ............................................................ 7
A note on U.S. Census data. ........................................................................................... 8
Minority Populations ...................................................................................................... 8
Low-Income (Poverty) Populations .................................................................................. 10
Elderly Populations ....................................................................................................... 11
Median Household Income ............................................................................................. 12
Identifications of Mobility Needs of Minority Populations .......................................................... 16
Distribution of State and Federal Funds................................................................................ 17
Disparate Impact Analysis ................................................................................................. 19
Title VI Compliance Report Submission Process ............................................................... 19
Appendix A - Title VI Annual Certification and Assurances ............................................... 20
Appendix B - Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification ......................... 36
Appendix C - Title VI Complaint Procedure....................................................................... 38
Appendix D - Title VI Complaint Form .............................................................................. 52
Appendix E – Public Participation Plan ............................................................................. 56
Appendix F - Language Assistance Plan ........................................................................... 76
1
Introduction
The Federal Transit Administration requires recipients to report certain general information to
determine compliance with Title VI. The collection and reporting of this information constitutes a
recipient’s Title VI Program. To ensure compliance with 49 CFR Section 21.9 (b), the FTA requires
that all recipients document their compliance with this chapter by submitting a Tit le VI Program to the
FTA’s regional civil rights officer once every three years. As subrecipients, the Capital Area
Metropolitan Planning
Organization (CAMPO) submits the information contained in this plan to their primary recipient,
MoDOT, on a schedule to be determined by the primary recipient, and is to be included as part of their
Title VI Program.
This report is provided as in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title 49, Chapter
53, Section 5332 of the United States Code; and the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Circular
4702.1B, titled “VI Requirements And Guidelines For Federal Transit Administration Recipients”, dated
October 1, 2012.
Organization
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organizations (CAMPO) is the designated metropolitan
planning organization for the Jefferson City, Missouri Urbanized Area whose purpose is to carry out a
continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive long range transportation planning process.
CAMPO is comprised of a Board of Directors composed of elected and appointed officials from Holts
Summit, St. Martins, Jefferson City, Callaway County, Cole County, selected state agencies, and
Federal transportation representatives serving as ex-officio members; and a Technical Committee that
consists of representatives from the agencies’ professional staffs and acts in an advisory capacity.
A memorandum of understanding between members identifies the City of Jefferson as the
administrator of CAMPO, and as such, provides staffing for CAMPO. The City of Jefferson provides
staff consisting of three full time transportation planners. The City also provides part time support
from the Director of Planning and Protective Services and an Administrative Assistant. The City
Counselor has been designated as the Title VI Coordinator for the City of Jefferson.
2
Program Requirements Applicable to CAMPO
The following checklist, derived from Chapter III, Chapter VI and Appendix A of FTA Circular 4702.1B,
denotes required elements included in this program. If an element is not required or included in this
plan, an explanation is provided.
General Requirements (Chapter III) Checklist
Title VI Annual Certifications and Assurances.
o Included.
Title VI Notice to the Public, including a list of locations where the notice is posted
o Included.
Title VI Complaint Procedures (i.e., instructions to the public regarding how to file a
Title VI discrimination complaint)
o Included.
Title VI Complaint Form
o Included.
List of transit-related Title VI investigations, complaints, and lawsuits
o Not included, no investigations, complaints or lawsuits have occurred.
Public Participation Plan, including information about outreach methods to engage
minority and limited English proficient populations (LEP), as well as a summary of
outreach efforts made since the last Title VI Program submission
o Included.
Language Assistance Plan for providing language assistance to persons with limited
English proficiency (LEP), based on the DOT LEP Guidance
o Included.
A table depicting the membership of non-elected committees and councils, the
membership of which is selected by the recipient, broken down by race, and a
description of the process the agency uses to encourage the participation of
minorities on such committees
o Response provided.
Primary recipients shall include a description of how the agency monitors its
subrecipients for compliance with Title VI, and a schedule of subrecipient Title VI
Program submissions
o Not Included, Not Applicable - CAMPO is not a primary recipient, but a subrecipient.
A Title VI equity analysis if the recipient has constructed a facility, such as a vehicle
storage facility, maintenance facility, operation center, etc.
o Not Included, Not Applicable – CAMPO does not construct facilities.
A copy of board meeting minutes, resolution, or other appropriate documentation
showing the board of directors or appropriate governing entity or official(s)
responsible for policy decisions reviewed and approved the Title VI Program. For
State DOT’s, the appropriate governing entity is the State’s Secretary of
Transportation or equivalent. The approval must occur prior to submission to FTA.
o Included, the resolution adopting this Title VI Program, by the Board of Directors is
located at the front of this document.
Additional information as specified in chapters IV, V, and VI, depending on whether
the recipient is a transit provider, a State, or a planning entity (see below)
o Included are requirements from Chapter VI – Requirements of MPOs
3
Requirements of MPOs (Chapter VI) Checklist
All requirements set out in Chapter III (General Requirements)
o Included – see above.
The requirements set out in Chapter IV (Transit Provider) if the MPO is a provider of
fixed route public transportation
o Not Included, not applicable – CAMPO does not provide any transportation.
Demographic profile of the metropolitan area
o Included.
A description of the procedures by which the mobility needs of minority populations are
identified and considered within the planning process
o Included.
Demographic maps that show the impacts of the distribution of State and Federal funds
in the aggregate for public transportation projects
o Maps and charts are included.
Analysis of the MPO’s transportation system investments that identifies and addresses
any disparate impacts
o Included.
Description of the procedures the agency uses to ensure nondiscriminatory pass-
through of FTA financial assistance (if requested)
o Not Included, Not Applicable – CAMPO is not a primary recipient.
Description of the procedures the agency uses to provide assistance to potential
subrecipients in a nondiscriminatory manner (if requested)
o Not Included, Not Applicable – CAMPO is not a primary recipient.
Title VI Compliance Report Submission Process
o Included.
4
General Requirements (Chapter III)
Title VI Annual Certification and Assurances
See Appendix A - Title VI Annual Certification and Assurances and Appendix B - Metropolitan
Transportation Planning Process Certification. Please note, as the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization is administered by the City of Jefferson the Title VI Annual Certification and Assurances
are signed by the City Administrator and affirmed by his attorney.
Title VI Notice to the Public
The notice to the public is posted on the CAMPO Title VI webpage, which can be accessed from other
pages on the website or directly at: http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/CAMPO/2015_Title_VI_Notice.pdf
and at the bulletin board located in the main hallway of the City of Jefferson (the CAMPO
Administrator) city hall, where CAMPO offices are located. At meetings and other activities not at the
CAMPO office, notices are made available to the public.
Figure 1 CAMPO Title VI Notice posted in public bulletin board at the John G. Christy
Municipal Building.
5
Title VI Complaint Procedures
Complaint Procedures may be found in Appendix C, are posted on the website,
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/CAMPO/TitleVIComplaintprocessupdatedNovember162012.pdf, as well as made
available at public meetings. FHWA and CAMPO Title VI brochures are available on the website and at
public meetings that explain Title VI and outline the complaint procedure.
Title VI Complaint Form
The Complaint Form may be found in Appendix D. They are posted on the website, as well as made
available at public meetings. http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/CAMPO/CAMPOTitleVIComplaintform2016.pdf
List of Transit-R elated Title VI Investigations, Complaints, and Lawsuits
No transit related Title VI investigations, complaints, nor lawsuits have involved CAMPO.
6
Public Participation Plan
The Public Participation Plan may be found in Appendix E.
Language Assistance Plan
The Limited English Proficiency Plan may be found in Appendix F.
Committee Membership
CAMPO is governed by a Board of Directors consisting of representatives from jurisdictions within the
planning area, Federal and State transportation agencies, and economic development representatives,
with some serving as ex-officio (non-voting) members. The Board of Directors is responsible for
providing official action on federally required plans, documents, and programs. The Board is also
responsible for changes in the bylaws and changes to the MPO boundary.
The Technical Committee consists of representatives from the member jurisdictions’ professional
staff and act in an advisory capacity. A full list of members of the Board of Directors and Technical
Committee can be found at the front of this document.
The CAMPO Board of Directors is responsible for appointing two voting members to the Technical
Committee; one is the private/freight transportation interest representative and the other a pedestrian
or biking interest representative.
Board of Directors
Non-Voting Ex-Officio Members (6)
MoDOT
(1)
FTA
(1)
FHWA
(1)
Other
Federal
Agency
(1)
Jefferson
City
Economic
Develop.R
ep.
(1)
Callaway
County
Economic
Develop.
Rep.
(1)
Voting Members (13)
Jefferson
City
(7)
Cole
County
(3)
Callaway
County
(1)
MoDOT
(1)
Holts
Summit
(1)
7
Requirements of MPOs (Chapter VI)
Demographic Profile of the Metropolitan Planning Area
Table 1 shows the populations for municipalities and unincorporated areas within the CAMPO planning
area. Table 2 shows the racial and ethnic make-up of the CAMPO planning area.
Table 1 - CAMPO Population by Jurisdiction
Total
Population
Metropolitan
Planning
Area Population
Adjusted Urban
Area Population
Census Designated
Urban Area
Population
Persons Percent Persons Percent Persons Percent
City of Jefferson (Cole County) 43,057 43,057 59.80% 43,057 72.08% 42,785 73.10%
St. Martins 1,140 1,140 1.58% 1,140 1.91% 1,063 1.82%
Taos 878 878 1.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Wardsville 1,506 1,506 2.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Unincorporated Cole County 18,507 25.71% 10,696 17.91% 10,048 17.17%
City of Jefferson (Callaway County) 22 22 0.03% 22 0.04% 0 0.00%
Holts Summit 3,247 3,247 4.51% 3,247 5.44% 3,108 5.31%
Lake Mykee 350 350 0.49% 350 0.59% 350 0.60%
Unincorporated Callaway County 3,290 4.57% 1,220 2.04% 1,179 2.01%
Totals 71,997 100.00% 59,732 100.00% 58,533 100.00%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Decennial Census
Table 2 – CAMPO Racial and Ethnic Makeup by Jurisdiction
Total
One Race
Two
or
More
Races
Hispanic
White
Black or
African
American
American
Indian
and
Alaska
Native
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
and
Other
Pacific
Islander
Some
Other
Callaway
County 44,332 40,778 2,032 217 245 17 201 842 707
Cole County 75,990 64,137 8,512 242 966 46 667 1,420 1,795
City of 43,079 33,581 7,263 141 755 25 333 959 1,103
8
Jefferson
City of Holts
Summit 3,247 2,991 128 10 15 2 33 68 73
Village of Lake
Mykee 350 339 2 0 3 0 0 6 5
City of St.
Martins 1,140 1,087 13 3 8 0 11 18 14
City of Taos 878 867 0 4 2 0 0 5 9
City of
Wardsville 1,506 1,471 9 5 4 5 0 12 7
CAMPO MPA 71,997 60,022 8,613 240 957 46 685 1,426 1,855
Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Decennial Census
A note on U.S. Census data.
While Table 1 and Table 2 were derived from 2010 U.S. Decennial Census data, which is the most
accurate data based on jurisdiction, the following maps use data from the 2016 5 Year American
Community Survey (ACS). ACS 1-, 3-, and 5-year estimates are period estimates, meaning they
represent the characteristics of the population and housing over a specific data collection period. Data
sets are combined to produce 12 months, 36 months or 60 months of data (referred to as 1 -year, 3-year
and 5-year data.) The population of a city or county determines whether the ACS will collect data for a 1 -
, 3-, or 5-year estimate. Most of the CAMPO region falls into the 5-year estimate category. For the most
current data, the 2012-2016 ACS was used to illustrate and analyze the demographics in this section.
Minority Populations
For purposes of Title VI and Environmental Justice, who is considered to be a “Minority”? The updated
DOT and FHWA environmental justice orders define five minority groups as follows:
Black (a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa);
Hispanic or Latino (a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or
other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race);
Asian American (a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East,
Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent);
American Indian and Alaskan Native (a person having origins in any of the original people of
North America, South America, including Central America, and who maintains cultural
identification through tribal affiliation or community recognition); and
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (people having origins in any of the original peoples
of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands).
Map 1 shows the distribution of minority population within the CAMPO planning area. The core of
Jefferson City has the highest density of minorities.
9
Map 1 – Percent of Minority Populations by Census Block Group
10
Low-Income (Poverty) Populations
Low-income or poverty is determined by the federal poverty guidelines and are represented by
individuals living below 185% of the poverty line, which are generated annually based on family size
and composition. Map 2 depicts the percent of low-income populations within the CAMPO planning
area.
The inner core of Jefferson City has block groups with significantly higher percentages, 25% to 65%,
of persons living below the poverty line than in the outlying area.
Map 2 - Percent of Low-Income (Poverty) Populations by Census Block Group
11
Elderly Populations
Map 3 shows the distribution of the elderly population within the CAMPO planning area.
The Jefferson City inner core has significantly fewer elderly individuals than in the surrounding area .
The western portion of the planning area and much of the surrounding rural area has higher
percentages of elderly individuals.
Map 3 – Percent of Elderly (65 Years and Older) Population by Census Block Group
12
Median Household Income
Map 4 depicts median household income distribution.
Map 4 shows that the central portions of Jefferson City have a higher density of lower median
household income compared to surrounding areas. The areas in and around Holts Summit, St.
Martins, Wardsville, and Taos tend to have higher incomes than the majority of the planning area.
Map 4 - Map of Median Household Income by Census Block Group
13
Table 3 - Disabled Population by County
Callaway County Cole County
With a disability Percent with a
disability With a disability Percent with a
disability
Estimate
Margin
of
Error
Estimate
Margin
of
Error
Estimate
Margin
of
Error
Estimate
Margin
of
Error
Total civilian non-
institutionalized
population
5,968 +/-
685 14.2% +/-1.6 9,675 +/-
834 13.2% +/-1.2
Population under 5
years 28 +/-34 1.1% +/-1.4 21 +/-24 0.4% +/-0.5
With a hearing
difficulty 28 +/-34 1.1% +/-1.4 14 +/-22 0.3% +/-0.5
With a vision difficulty 13 +/-23 0.5% +/-0.9 7 +/-11 0.1% +/-0.2
Population 5 to 17
years 556 +/-
221 7.9% +/-3.1 704 +/-
259 5.4% +/-2.0
With a hearing
difficulty 56 +/-62 0.8% +/-0.9 51 +/-47 0.4% +/-0.4
With a vision difficulty 91 +/-
113 1.3% +/-1.6 71 +/-73 0.5% +/-0.6
With a cognitive
difficulty 455 +/-
210 6.4% +/-3.0 403 +/-
140 3.1% +/-1.1
With an ambulatory
difficulty 165 +/-
129 2.3% +/-1.8 160 +/-
167 1.2% +/-1.3
With a self-care
difficulty 140 +/-
122 2.0% +/-1.7 76 +/-63 0.6% +/-0.5
Population 18 to 64
years 3,292 +/-
528 12.1% +/-1.9 5,590 +/-
749 12.1% +/-1.6
With a hearing
difficulty 907 +/-
278 3.3% +/-1.0 1,307 +/-
343 2.8% +/-0.7
With a vision difficulty 334 +/-
147 1.2% +/-0.5 1,321 +/-
360 2.9% +/-0.8
14
With a cognitive
difficulty 1,222 +/-
380 4.5% +/-1.4 2,513 +/-
443 5.4% +/-1.0
With an ambulatory
difficulty 1,802 +/-
399 6.6% +/-1.5 2,862 +/-
531 6.2% +/-1.2
With a self-care
difficulty 450 +/-
173 1.7% +/-0.6 699 +/-
251 1.5% +/-0.5
With an independent
living difficulty 913 +/-
262 3.4% +/-1.0 1,761 +/-
395 3.8% +/-0.9
Population 65 years
and over 2,092 +/-
363 40.2% +/-6.4 3,360 +/-
403 37.4% +/-4.3
With a hearing
difficulty 1,012 +/-
290 19.5% +/-5.4 1,479 +/-
278 16.5% +/-3.2
With a vision difficulty 282 +/-
151 5.4% +/-2.9 605 +/-
253 6.7% +/-2.7
With a cognitive
difficulty 396 +/-
228 7.6% +/-4.5 728 +/-
219 8.1% +/-2.4
With an ambulatory
difficulty 1,199 +/-
307 23.1% +/-5.6 2,070 +/-
304 23.0% +/-3.3
With a self-care
difficulty 308 +/-
159 5.9% +/-3.1 517 +/-
150 5.8% +/-1.7
With an independent
living difficulty 738 +/-
236 14.2% +/-4.5 1,264 +/-
255 14.1% +/-2.8
Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Decennial Census
Table 4 - Cole and Callaway County Disabled Populations
Callaway County Cole County
Disability status 4.4% 4.2%
Hearing difficulty 3.0% 3.2%
Vision difficulty 3.2% 3.5%
Cognitive difficulty 3.4% 3.5%
Ambulatory difficulty 3.5% 3.7%
Self-care difficulty 3.6% 3.6%
Independent living difficulty 3.6% 2.7%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Decennial Census
15
Table 5, found below, shows the employment profile for the metropolitan planning area.
Table 5 - MPA Employment Profile for 2010
Total Primary Jobs Count Share
Total Primary Jobs 52,097 100.00%
Jobs by Worker Age Count Share
Age 29 or younger 10,636 20.40%
Age 30 to 54 30,992 59.50%
Age 55 or older 10,469 20.10%
Jobs by Earnings Count Share
$1,250 per month or less 8,732 16.80%
$1,251 to $3,333 per month 25,818 49.60%
More than $3,333 per month 17,547 33.70%
Jobs by NAICS Industry Sector Count Share
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 181 0.30%
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 91 0.20%
Utilities 270 0.50%
Construction 2,407 4.60%
Manufacturing 3,427 6.60%
Wholesale Trade 1,147 2.20%
Retail Trade 4,850 9.30%
Transportation and Warehousing 524 1.00%
Information 936 1.80%
Finance and Insurance 2,034 3.90%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 287 0.60%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 1,721 3.30%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 1,091 2.10%
16
Administration & Support, Waste Management and Remediation 1,928 3.70%
Educational Services 1,920 3.70%
Health Care and Social Assistance 4,276 8.20%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 758 1.50%
Accommodation and Food Services 2,792 5.40%
Other Services (excluding Public Administration) 1,654 3.20%
Public Administration 19,803 38.00%
Jobs by Worker Race Count Share
White Alone 48,444 93.00%
Black or African American Alone 2,496 4.80%
American Indian or Alaska Native Alone 179 0.30%
Asian Alone 583 1.10%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Alone 20 0.00%
Two or More Race Groups 375 0.70%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Decennial Census
Identifications of Mobility Needs of Minority Populations
In the development of the Public Participation Plan, as well as other planning activities, CAMPO sought
out and considered the needs of those traditionally underserved by existing transportation systems,
including minority households.
CAMPO strives to include all the public, including protected classes, in its planning activities. The
interested parties list includes employees of Lincoln University, a historically black college, as well as
many community action organizations that work with and represent minorities. Racial minorities
make up approximately 16.5% of the CAMPO population, with majority located in the core of the city
in close proximity to city hall, where the majority of the CAMPO public meetings and events are held.
CAMPO meetings are also held at a time and place served by public transportation.
The Board of Directors includes many elected officials which represent minority constituents and meet
with them regularly. The current Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors is the one known member
of a minority class. The Technical Committee currently has no known minority members. These
members of the committees are chosen by their respective jurisdictions and not CAMPO, itself.
17
Distribution of State and Federal Funds
Map 1, located in the Demographic Profile of the Metropolitan Area section of this document, shows
the minority population for the MPO area. The highest concentrations of minority populations are
found in the core of Jefferson City. Map 5 and Table 6 below shows the impacts of the distribution of
State and Federal funds in the aggregate for public transportation projects between 2016 and 2019.
This chart shows that approximately 51% of funding within the 2016-2019 period was spent in
Jefferson City.
Map 5 - Distribution of State and Federal Funds by Jurisdiction
18
Table 6 - Distribution of Funds by Jurisdiction
2016 2017 2018 2019 Sub Total
City of Jefferson
Bridge $11,568,000 $5,000 $2,817,000 $1,004,000 $15,394,000
Non-motorized $1,238,552 $349,564 $349,564 $1,937,680
Road $4,098,640 $6,822,170 $1,907,170 $859,000 $13,686,980
Transit $907,827 $802,156 $940,427 $891,062 $3,541,472
Total $34,560,132
Callaway County
Non-motorized $348,000 $348,000
Bridge $24,000 $88,000 $112,000
Road $15,902,000 $15,902,000
Total $16,362,000
Wardsville
Road $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,000 $16,000
Total $16,000
Cole County
Bridge $1,000 $1,000
Road $45,000 $2,794,000 $265,000 $7,354,000 $10,458,000
Total $10,459,000
Taos
Non-motorized $25,000 $25,000 $50,000
Bridge $1,396,000 $1,396,000
Road $40,000 $67,000 $107,000
Total $1,553,000
Various
Non-motorized $1,868,000 $61,000 $66,000 $1,995,000
Bridge $65,000 $63,500 $12,500 $141,000
Road $606,000 $597,000 $558,000 $548,250 $2,309,250
Total $4,445,250
out of the MPO area.
* County projects include the MPO area in that specific county but also extend to areas
outside of the MPO area.
* Various projects are projects with no defined specific location or cross through and extend
19
Disparate Impact Analysis
Based on the above table and map in the previous section, there is an obvious correlation between the
location of the majority of protected classes located in MPO and majority of transportation system
investment being spent, one can conclude that there are no disparate impacts as a result of MPO
decisions in transportation investments.
CAMPO only has decision making authority on the annual allocation of approximately $150,000 in
Consolidated Planning Grant funds (CPG). These funds can only be used for planning activities, not
capital projects. Annually, 96% of CPG funds are spent on salaries and minor administrative direct
costs.
Previous funding sources, such as sub-allocated Small Urban Surface Transportation Program (STP)
funds were historically used for capital projects. As of July 1, 2016, the Missouri Highway and
Transportation Commission ceased providing these funds to MPOs with populations under 200,000.
However, unobligated balances could be spent down through FY 2019.
How and where funds are spent is determined by the CAMPO Board of Directors, and ultimately
approved by MoDOT. Some STP funds were approved by the Board of Directors to be spent by
member jurisdictions through a direct sub-allocation from MoDOT to those communities. These
allocations were not administered by CAMPO. The following list represents the STP expenditures since
the previous Title VI Program update in 2017:
Jefferson City - Clark Avenue/US 50 Traffic Study – $82,000
St. Martins – ADA and pedestrian/bicycle access along Business 50 West - $30,000
CAMPO Travel Demand Modeling and Visioning - $102,000
JEFFTRAN System-Wide Transit Assessment – $60,000
Only two projects were administered by CAMPO, the Travel Demand Modeling and Visioning project to
support the update of the CAMPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, and the JEFFTRAN
Assessment.
The Travel Demand Modeling and Visioning project covered the entire CAMPO planning area and thus
covered geographic areas that include the protected classes. The JEFFTRAN System -Wide Transit
Assessment include a detailed review of impacts on protected classes. The JEFFTRAN system is
heavily utilized by the protected classes and operates within the Jefferson City core where the highest
concentrations of low income, elderly, minority, and those with disabilities.
Title VI Compliance Report Submission Process
CAMPO submits a Title VI Compliance report to MoDOT on an annual basis. The process is initiated by
MoDOT staff in form of a detailed questionnaire for CAMPO to complete and return to MoDOT in a
timely manner. The questionnaire addresses such items as planning activities performed, actions
taken to promote Title VI compliance, contracts awarded, Title VI complaints, public involvement
activities and related Title VI public interactions.
20
Appendix A - Title VI Annual Certification and Assurances
AN UPDATED VERSION OF THIS CERTIFICATE IS ANTICIPATED TO BE
RECEIVED FROM FTA IN SPRING 2020.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Appendix B - Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process
Certification
37
38
Appendix C - Title VI Complaint Procedure
39
40
41
52
Appendix D - Title VI Complaint Form
53
54
55
56
Appendix E – Public Participation Plan
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
page 12
74
page 13
75
Page 14
76
Appendix F - Language Assistance Plan
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three
business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Title VI Program Update
December 5, 2019
Summary
The Federal Transit Administration requires recipients to report certain general information to determine
compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The collection and reporting of this information
constitutes a recipient’s Title VI Program. To ensure compliance with 49 CFR Section 21.9 (b), the FTA
requires that all recipients document their compliance with this chapter by submitting a Title VI Program to the
FTA’s regional civil rights officer once every three years. As subrecipients, the Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization submits the information contained in this pla n to their primary recipient, MoDOT, on a
schedule to be determined by the primary recipient, and is to be included as part of their Title VI Program.
The plan consists of copies of many of our documents along with our activities involving civil rights:
Title VI annual certifications and assurances
Title VI Notice to the Public
Title VI Complaint Procedures
Title VI Complaint Form
List of Transit-Related Title VI Investigations, Complaints, and Lawsuits
Public Participation Plan
Language Assistance Plan
Committee Membership
Demographic Profile of CAMPO & Maps
Responses to several Title VI questions
The draft document is included with this staff report.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends review of the draft document. Any edits or comments should be forwarded to Katrina
Williams and kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org.
Agenda Item 6A
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Status of Current Work Tasks
December 5, 2019
Summary
The following list includes work tasks that are currently in progress or have been completed since the previous
Technical Committee meeting:
Title VI Program update (including Public Participation Plan, Language Assistance
Plan). See Staff Report
Federal Performance Measures. Staff continues collaborating with MODOT staff
concerning various federal performance measures required by MAP-21 and the FAST Act.
Jefferson City Data Assistance. Staff is working with other Jefferson City planners in
providing data and mapping assistance in the update of the of the City’s Comprehensive
Plan.
Major Thoroughfare Plan Development. Staff is developing a process for creation of a
Major Thoroughfare Plan. The Major Thoroughfare Plan will be developed through
stakeholder input and will pull directly from the recently completed Travel Demand
Model.
Agenda Item 7A
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634 -6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Election of Officers
December 5, 2019
Summary
Taken form Section 23 of the CAMPO Bylaws:
Section 23 Officers, Terms of Office
23.1 The Technical Committee shall elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman at the end of the last meeting
of the calendar year. The terms of office shall be one year, to expire at the first meeting of the
calendar year following the first full year of the position. Officers shall be eligible for re-election,
but shall be elected by a majority vote of the voting members present.
23.2 The Chairman of the Technical Committee shall preside at all meetings. The Chairman may call
special meetings of the Technical Committee.
23.3 The Vice Chairman shall assume the responsibilities of the Chairman in his or her absence.
23.4 Appointed positions on the Technical Committee shall commence and/or conclude at the first
meeting of the calendar year after the term expiration.
23.5 A modification of the Technical Committee members may occur mid-year if there are changes in
staff or resignations.
(Amended 4/15/2015)
Agenda Item 7B
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634 -6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabili ties Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
2020 Meeting Schedule
December 5, 2019
Summary
Following is the staff recommended list of meeting dates for the CAMPO Technical Committee through
December 31, 2020.
The Technical Committee meets the first Thursday of the month at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room
(Rm. #200), John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty.
CAMPO members and the public will be notified if changes occur.
January 2
February 6
March 5
April 2
May 7
June 4
July 2
August 6
September 3
October 1
November 5
December 3
Agenda Item 7C