Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout09/21/99 CCM155 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on September 21, 1999 at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor John Ferris presided. Members present: Ferris, Zietlow, Hamilton, Johnson, and Smith. Members absent: None. Also present: Police Chief Ed Belland, Attorney Ron Batty, Public Works Director Jim Dillman, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Planning & Zoning Administrator Loren Kohnen, and City Clerk - Treasurer Paul Robinson. 1. Agenda Moved by Jim Johnson, seconded by John Hamilton, to approve the agenda as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Consent Agenda A. Approval of Tobacco License for North American Liquor. B. Resolution 99-53 Approving of Gambling License for Loretto Fire Department Relief Association. C. Approval for Disposal of Surplus Equipment. Moved by Jim Johnson, seconded by John Hamilton, to approve the consent agenda. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Comments from Residents in Attendance on Items Not on the Agenda Dick Picard of 2765 County Road 19 said that he was here today representing the Lake Independence Citizens Association (LICA). He read a letter addressed to Mary Johnson and to John Ferris, the Mayors of the Cities of Independence and Medina, concerning the cutting of weeds at Lake Independence. He said this year the weeds were cut only one time. LICA expressed concern about this limited amount of cutting to the County. The County was okay with permanently placing a mechanical harvester at Lake Independence at no cost to the Cities. However, they would like a letter from the Cities requesting the mechanical harvester. Mr. Picard said he was requesting this evening Council support for the placement of a mechanical harvester at Lake Independence. Moved by Jim Johnson, seconded by John Hamilton, to support the use of a mechanical harvester, provided by the Hennepin County Park Board, at Lake Independence. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Park Commission Comments There were none. 6. Planning Commission Comments There were none. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 156 7. Consider the Recommendations from the Planning Commission on the 2000-2020 Comprehensive Plan Mayor Ferris said he would go through the recommendations as listed in the memo from the Planning Commission. Item 1: recommended changing the guiding of six homes on Hamel Road from Urban Residential to Uptown Hamel. Jim Johnson asked what this area was currently zoned. Loren Kohnen said they are currently zoned Urban Commercial. He said this change occurred during the 1992 Comprehensive Plan. There was some discussion about the current guiding. Kohnen said the residents of this area presented a petition requesting inclusion in the Uptown Hamel area guiding. This zoning would give them the flexibility of developing commercially or residentially. A poll of the Council indicated that all Council members were in favor of this change. Item 2: involved changing the property south of Foxberry Farms from the Urban Commercial guiding to Urban Commercial 1. Phil Zietlow asked if there were any applicable legal issues since there was already a development proposal in process for this property. Ron Batty said there are no vested rights in zoning or Comprehensive Plan designations unless construction has been started or a building permit has been issued. Therefore, it would be possible to change the guiding of this property if the City Council so desired. Phil Zietlow said there is an option where the City Council could leave out a piece of the property and zone that Urban Commercial and leave the remainder of the property Urban Commercial 1. Jim Johnson raised a number of concerns about the buffering between the residential areas and the commercial areas. He thought for example that Chippewa Road provided a good buffer between the commercial and the residential area, however, there seemed to be no adequate buffer on the porperty south of Foxberry Farms. He said in other cities they use a multi -family or townhome land use as a buffer between commercial and residential uses. When Lundgren proposed development on this property they proposed a lower profile office complex. He was not sure how the new zoning district UC1 would create a better buffer or better land use between these two zones. He was concerned that the Urban Commercial 1, campus style development, may not include low enough profile buildings. He said that townhomes may provide a better buffer. He said that the Urban Commercial 1 area definitely needs more definition. He suggested that several zoning districts may be needed within the Urban Commercial 1 guiding, like an Urban Commercial 2 which would provide for lower profile buildings up against a Urban Residential zone. He said he was looking for a little bit more complex zoning and potentially additional guiding that would show a better buffer between residential and commercial uses. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 157 Linda Fisher, 1500 N.W. Court, said she prepared a memo concerning the history of the Rolling Green Business Park proposal, the property which the City Council is considering changing from Urban Commercial to Urban Commercial 1. She called her memo the Odyssey of a property owner in the City of Medina. She said she had been before the Council at several other meetings. Fisher said on behalf of the property owner she would like to register her righteous indignation for how the process has treated him. She said that residents are important to the City and that the City Council should listen to the residents. However, property owners are also a stakeholders in the City and are also important. She said this developer has followed the rules of the City, has met with City Staff on many occasions, has also met with Council members, and has followed all of the City's rules and processes up to this point. She said the property in question includes 40 acres of land north of Highway 55 and west of County Road 116. She said in 1990 the Medina Comprehensive Plan designated the property in question for industrial use. This was nine years before Rolling Green purchased the property. The 1992 Comprehensive Plan designated the property for sewered commercial/industrial development. In 1992, Foxberry Farms development was approved. Urban Industrial/Urban Commercial guiding for the Rolling Green property preceded the development of Foxberry Farms and was considered appropriate as indicated in the September 25, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. In August 1997 the City began discussions on an update of the Comprehensive Plan. On January 17, 1998 and February 7, 1998, the Planning Commission held meetings with Foxberry Farms residents to discuss the guiding of the northern portion of the property in question. At that time there was a recommendation to change the northern portion to multi -family use as a buffer between the single family and commercial areas. Many residents at that meeting requested that it be left in Urban Commercial/industrial guiding. In June 1998 the City Council approved the rezoning of a rural commercial lot to Urban Commercial/Urban Industrial for the plat immediately south of this property. This plat included a 50,000 square foot light industrial facility known as Flagship Technologies. At that time the record did not indicate that light industrial use was inconsistent with the land use vision for the area. March 3, 1999, Rolling Green Business Park held an initial meeting with City Staff and one City Council member and at no time during this meeting were Rolling Green Partners told that the development concept was inconsistent with the vision of the City or the City's Comprehensive Plan update. The City advised Rolling Green that it would need to apply for rezoning from Rural Residential to Urban Commercial, subdivision, and conditional use permit for the 111,504 square foot facility. May 20, 1999 Rolling Green Business Park held a second meeting with City Staff to discuss soil conditions, Meander Road, water quality treatment ponds, and a number of other planning details. At no time were they advised that this project was inconsistent with the vision for the City of Medina or the ongoing Comprehensive Plan. June 4, 1999, Rolling Green applied for rezoning, subdivision, and conditional use permit approvals pursuant to the direction received on March 1999 at the May 1999 meetings. July 13, 1999, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Rolling Green application. A number of residents testified in opposition of the application, however, the Planning Commission voted unanimously recommended approval of the rezoning and subdivision, but denied the conditional use permit based on inadequate screening and a building that was too big for the buildable area of the land. In the record there were no major concerns concerning the rezoning. July 30, 1999, the City's planning and zoning administrator prepared a memo to the City Council advising the City Council of the Planning Commission's July 13, 1999 recommendation. In that memo the zoning administrator stated that the application met all requirements of the City's ordinances and exceeded them in certain areas. He said the City does not have an ordinance regarding building area to building lot area. August 3, 1999 Foxberry Farms residents and Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 158 others submitted an EAW petition to the City. September 7, 1999 Medina City Council denied the EAW petition since the project would not have the potential for significant environmental effects. At this meeting the City Council referred to the Planning Commission August 24th meeting on the Comprehensive Plan and on the possibility of a moratorium on commercial development. Prior to September 7th Rolling Green had been told its application would be considered at the September 21st meeting if the EAW was denied. Based on the Planning Commission public hearing, Rolling Green submitted a revised site plan for consideration by the City Council at the September 21 st meeting. The revised plan included taller earthen berms and additional evergreen trees which would substantially screen the loading dock area from Foxberry Farms. On September 10, 1999 Rolling Green representatives received a call from City Staff indicating that Rolling Green's pending application would not be heard on September 21st but would be continued to October 5, 1999 to allow the City to consider its Comprehensive Plan update. September 14, 1999 Rolling Green submits a proposal to the Planning Commission for a land use guiding based on a review of the minutes and discussion from the August 24th Planning Commission meeting. The proposal opposed a moratorium on development that would apply to its pending application. Staff advises Rolling Green that its application is the only application that would potentially be affected by the moratorium. On September 15, 1999, Rolling Green submitted a letter to the City objecting to the continuance of its pending application. Fisher said they have come very far down the road on the development of this property. She summarized some of the reasons why this development should go forward. She said everybody would like to have control over everything. She said we need to learn to live together. She said a 400 to 1,000 foot buffer is unrealistic, as is a criteria that buildings not be visible from another district. She said if the City continues to consider such regulations you will end up purchasing a considerable amount of property. She said property owners are also stakeholders and also need to be considered. We do not think that what we say tonight will make a difference. She said if the City Council was willing to discuss their recommendations for changes and seek a compromise on the zoning and the development of the property, they are interested in hearing it. Kirt Woodhouse, Rolling Green Partner, said when he came into town he invested a great deal of money to create this development. Before he did this he checked the City's Comprehensive Plan, guide plan, and met with Staff. No one raised a red flag about this development throughout the entire process. He said he received nothing but green lights. We did not need or ask for any variances and have moved forward through the application and approval process as any developer would. He asked if any of the Council members or Staff would have done any differently based on his experience. Woodhouse said he followed the City's processes. If he had known six months ago that the City was considering these changes, he would not have gone forward with it. However, now he is stuck, he purchased the property and is trying to come up with a solution that is fair. He said he just wants to get out of this process with his skin. He said he cannot change the topography. Foxberry Farms is higher than this property. They will always be able to see what is developed on this property. He said he does not want to lose his shirt because he followed the rules. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September21, 1999 159 Kristin Johnson, 905 Foxberry Farms Road, said that she feels for the developer and was sorry that he may have been misled. However, this particular development does not fit the vision of the City. She said it is not the City's fault that he did not purchase the property with the condition that the rezoning of the property be approved. She said Mr. Woodhouse is a professional developer and knew that he could have made his purchased of the property contingent upon it being rezoned. He decided to take the risk. Kristin Johnson read portions of the Comprehensive Plan that highlighted the incongruities between this proposal and the City's Comprehensive Plan. Johnson said in July the Planning Commission voted to approve the rezoning. However, at that meeting the Planning Commission raised several concerns about the rezoning that were not reflected in the minutes. She said the draft of the Comprehensive Plan that is being developed should not be ignored. At that meeting they did ignore the Comprehensive Plan because they were looking at the rezoning request as it related to the current Comprehensive Plan. However, tonight, the City Council is looking at an update of the Comprehensive Plan and should not consider this development when considering the guiding this property. You should consider your vision for the City. Johnson said at the August 24'h Council meeting residents tried to work with the developer to change the way the bui►ding looked, the way it was buffered, and a number of other suggestions. At that time the developer said these changes were unfair and would not be possible. Now that there is significant opposition, all of a sudden the developer has included these changes. She said at this point it seems too late to accept this compromise. She said it is unfortunate that they have come this far, however, the City Staff does not talk for the City Council. She said this is not just a visual issue, there are a lot of other issues such as traffic and noise. She said the Flagship building is not comparable to this particular proposal. She said the residents are frustrated with Woodhouse, he has not been willing to work with the residents, and he is not going to have to live next this building as we are. Jim Johnson asked if there were any other options. He said that he was also concerned for the developer. There was some discussion about the Woodhouse proposal. John Ferris said currently the item under discussion is whether or not to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission to change the guiding on this property from Urban Commercial to Urban Commercial 1 (UC1). Jim Johnson said we may need more zones than the UC1 Carolyn Smith said it is not necessarily a question of more zones, we may need to add additional restrictions to the current Urban Commercial zone and to the Urban Commercial 1 zone to require the needed buffering. John Ferris said it is potentially okay to have more zones. Either way there will be a lot of work involved in crafting of the zoning ordinances that will implement the City's guide plan. The question now is whether or not to guide all this property to UC1. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 160 Dave Klaiman, 950 Sunset Court, said it seems like the rules are changing. He said that Medina's codes already changed in 1997 when they added a provision that prohibited objectionable effects from such property. Clearly this development proposal has that. John Ferris said these points are well taken, however, the question currently is whether or not to change the guiding from what was proposed to Urban Commercial 1. Linda Fisher said that the Medina code has changed, however, what changed was not the zoning ordinance but an issue related to the nuisance ordinance. Ferris asked what the direction of the Council was on this issue. Four members of the Council agreed to change it from Urban Commercial to Urban Commercial 1. Jim Johnson was not in favor of this change. John Ferris asked why Jim Johnson was not in favor of this change. Jim Johnson said that unlike other City Councils, this City Council has always been concerned for all parties involved, residents and developers. We have always tried to come up with a solution that makes everybody happy. He said the developer has changed his plan to try to accommodate some of the concerns of the residents and he thinks that may need considering. He also is not sure about what the UC1 definition involves, he thought it might need more clarification as a part of the Comprehensive Plan before it is approved. Item 3: was an issue concerning the City's trails. There was some discussion about the City trails. Paul Robinson said that the City did not show all of the trails as shown in the Northwest League of Municipalities trail map. He said that one of the trails not shown ran along Holy Name Drive. He said the Park Commission removed this trail a while ago because the road was too narrow. They moved the trail over to Tamarack. The other trail was one that was extended west of Hamel Road to Camp lduhapi. Robinson said to date he has not had any clarification on if this is still in the plans. Because of this it has not been added. At this time the City Council directed Staff to go ahead and make the changes they had information on and to leave Hamel Road trail off the map for the time being. Item 4: was a concern about the safety of the intersection of Trunk Highway 55 and Willow Drive and a request for a signal at that intersection. John Ferris said the signal is already shown in the Comprehensive Plan for 2002. Item 5: was a request for sewer service along Shawnee Woods Road. During the work session with the Planning Commission and the City Council, residents of Shawnee Woods submitted a petition requesting that their road be guided for sewer service. They would like the guiding to reflect a suburban residential zone in order to offset the cost of the assessment. At this time the City Council was okay with adding this to a watch area that may need to be sewered in the future, but was not in favor in guiding this area as suburban residential at this time. Item 6: two pieces of property owned by Elizabeth Sedgwick and Ken Bechler along Arrowhead Drive. There was some discussion about this issue being interrelated with the guiding of the neighboring piece of property. Elizabeth Sedgwick said that depending on what occurs with the neighboring piece of property, they would like their piece of property to reflect that. At this time, Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 161 if the recommendation went forward for a Rural Residential guiding, they would be okay with guiding both of their properties Rural Residential. Item 7: concept road extending from Cheyenne Trail. There was some discussion on this issue. Robinson said the recommendation of the Planning Commission was that there be no change. Phil Zietlow said that this had been guided in the Comprehensive Plan for quite some time. All Council members were in favor of leaving the Cheyenne Trail concept road. Item 8: adding the Department of Natural Resources biological survey to the woodland map. All were in favor. Item 9: it was recommended that an appendix be added that help those considering a choice between green acres and agricultural preserve, recognizing the City does not have control over green acres. All were in favor. Item 10: issue concerning the maintenance and upkeep of City trails. The Planning Commission recommended leaving this specific issue out of the Comprehensive Plan. The Council agreed. Item 11: extending sewer further south and east of Hunter and west of Brockton Lane. After some discussion on this issue, the Council decided to use Navajo Road as a barrier between the two districts. They wanted the sewer line to continue to follow along Navajo Road. Item 12A: request from Joe and Bill Cavanaugh to have three properties, two owned by Richard Cavanaugh and one by Joe Cavanaugh to be guided Rural Residential. Bill Cavanaugh said that he would like the top half of the property to be guided Rural Residential. The recommendation from the Planning Commission was to keep this parcel guided Urban Commercial 1. They said that it has been guided industrial for quite some time. Loren Kohnen reiterated that from Staff's point of view, they would rather keep this property guided Urban Commercial 1. Jerry Jubert, owner of the property of the east of the Cavanaugh property, said that they just completed constructing a berm on the northern part of their property with the idea that there will be commercial development on this property in the future. He said it sounds like the Urban Commercial 1 zone will require a large buffer between the commercial and residential zones. If this is true having to border residential property on two sides would create a large area that they could not develop. If Mr. Cavanaugh wants to create the entire buffer on his property, then he would be okay with this change, otherwise he would have as strenuous as an objection to changing the guiding on this property. Mr. Cavanaugh said that he did not want to worry about the buffer. He said he did not need any buffer on his property. Mr. Cavanaugh said that putting commercial that deep into the property Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 162 did not seem to make sense as it is hard to market and build commercial property that is that far off of the highway. He said it makes more sense to have it in a Rural Residential zoning. Reg Pederson said he would like Mr. Cavanaugh's property left guided as Urban Commercial 1. He said if this were to change to Rural Residential, that would create Rural Residential property on two sides of his property and would make it nearly impossible for him to develop his property in the Urban Commercial 1 area, especially if he is required to create a large buffer. Four Council members were in favor of changing this into Urban Commercial 1. Jim Johnson was opposed. John Ferris asked why Jim Johnson did not want to approve the Urban Commercial 1 zoning for this property. Jim Johnson said that he was surprised at the amount of property that was guided for Urban Commercial development. He said the City keeps eating away at its Rural Residential areas that he was not in favor of that. He thought it would be better to divide the commercial area along the frontage road with the property north of the frontage road Rural Residential and south Urban Commercial. Carolyn Smith said this property has always been guided for industrial development. She said the Urban Commercial 1 development is not a significant change from the previous guiding. Jim Johnson said he thought we were for no growth. He was in favor of less development. Item 12B: was a request from Bill Cavanaugh to have three properties split between Rural Residential and Urban Commercial 1. Bill Cavanaugh said they had revised their request from the last Planning Commission meeting. He showed where they wanted the line drawn. City Staff was to evaluate this line and draw it in a format for approval. There was some discussion on the City Council about the line. All were in favor of splitting the property between Rural Residential and Urban Commercial, citing it would create a better buffer between the Rural Residential and Urban Commercial zones and would line up with the request from the two properties to the east to be guided Rural Residential. Item 13: was to show the potential realignment of County Road 19. Paul Robinson said that the Planning Commission and Staff had thought this realignment was shown in county plans. He said it was not. He said the actual recommendation from the Planning Commission was to be consistent with Hennepin County's plan. Since it was not shown on Hennepin County's plan, the City Council recommended not to make any changes to the transportation plan at this time. Item 14: show a buffer between residential districts and commercial. Paul Robinson said there was an overall policy in the land use section of the Comprehensive Plan that stated that all residential areas be buffered from commercial areas. Part of the conversation at the Planning Commission level was that the responsibility of those buffers be shared by both districts. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 163 Ron Batty said that may lead into the recommendation to hire a professional planner. Maybe the City Council could hire a professional planner to talk about what some of those buffers may be. He said Bill Thibault from Thibault and Associates had reviewed the Comprehensive Plan. Batty said he may be able to lend some insight about the different types of buffers that may be available. John Ferris said there was a recommendation from the Planning Commission to hire a planning consultant. John Ferris and the Council agreed this would be a good idea. Staff was directed to put together options and information for the next Council meeting on this issue. The next item was whether or not to set up a committee for developing different zoning districts. There was some discussion on this. Overall the City Council thought it would be a good idea and directed Staff to put additional information together on this issues as well. Moved by Phil Zietlow, seconded by Carolyn Smith, to table the approval of the Comprehensive Plan until the October 5, 1999 as well as consideration of a moratorium. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Table Items 3, 4, and 5 Relating to the Rolling Green Business Park Moved by Carolyn Smith, seconded by John Hamilton, to table the above items. Motion passed unanimously. Dave Klaiman, 950 Sunset Court, requested clarification on whether or not the City Council was going to address a moratorium on the Urban Commercial/Urban Commercial 1 property in the City. John Ferris said that would be considered at the next meeting. Ron Batty said that on the next agenda, October 5, all items that were tabled would be back on the agenda. 9. $5,000 to Complete the Trail on County Road 116 Moved by Carolyn Smith, seconded by Jim Johnson, to approve $5,000 to complete the trail. Motion passed unanimously. There was discussion about upkeep of the City trails. Jim Johnson wanted to know if the City was going to do that. John Hamilton suggested that the City create an "adopt a trail" program where people or neighbors would maintain portions of the trail. There was some discussion about winter maintenance. Jim Dillman said that the City will not be conducting snow removal on any trails unless residents want to do the snow removal on their own. 10. Extension of Prairie Drive Jim Dillman said he needed Council approval to start the process for extending Prairie Drive. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 164 Ron Batty asked if this was to trigger a two year time line by which they would work to extend Prairie Drive. Jim Diliman said yes, that is true. Moved by Jim Johnson, seconded by Carolyn Smith, to approve the extension of the frontage Road, Prairie Drive. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Consumer Confidence Report Jim Dillman said that a copy of the consumer confidence report was included in the packet. Carolyn Smith said that she had some ideas for formatting to spruce up the report a little bit. She handed these to Jim Dillman. All thought it was a good report. Jim Dillman said they created this report to fulfill a reporting requirement. 12. Railroad Crossings Paul Robinson said the Soo Line Railroad (D/B/A Canadian Pacific Railroad) wanted to install a signal light and arms at two railroad crossings. One at Trunk Highway 55 and Willow Drive, and the other on Townline Road by Loretto. He said that the City's participation in the cost is 10%, however, when putting together the resolution he realized that the intersection at Townline Road was shared between the City of Independence and Medina. He said typically the railroad bills the city that maintain the roadway and then the responsible city bills the other city for half. Robinson said Jim Dillman spoke with the public works director of Independence and he spoke with the City Clerk of Independence. They were okay with paying the 5% of the cost, however, they had already completed their budgeting process for the year 2000 and would not be able to pay until 2001. Robinson said that from Staff's point of view that would be okay if it was okay with the City Council. Consensus with the Council was to go ahead and bill Independence in 2001. Kristen Johnson asked how intersections get approved. She said that there was significant problems at the intersection at 116 and Pinto and asked if that intersection was scheduled to be improved. Jim Dillman said that it was, however, it was delayed because of some issues with construction and improvement of the TH 55 and CR 116 intersection. Therefore, it has been postponed for the time being. Moved by Jim Johnson, seconded Phil Zietlow, to approve Resolution 99-54 & 99-55 authorizing the City to enter into an agreement with the railroad to pay 10% of the cost of the signalization. Motion passed unanimously. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 165 13. Resolution 99-56 Authorizing the Police Chief to Enter Into an Agreement with Hennepin County for the Safe and Sober Program for 1999-2000 Moved by John Hamilton, seconded by Jim Johnson, to approve the Resolution 99-56. Motion passed unanimously. 14, Pay the Bills Moved by Jim Johnson, seconded by Carolyn Smith, to approve the bills, order check numbers 20129-20187 for $126, 300.09, and payroll check numbers 16261-16274 for $15, 624.04. Motion passed unanimously. There was a question about repair to a squad car. Belland said it was for repair due to a run in with a deer. There were also questions about the City's imprest fund and petty cash funds. Robinson said that the imprest fund is $2,000 checking account by which the City clerk can write checks for small amounts. He said there is also a small petty cash fund for the police department. Break from 9:20-9:30. 14. Executive Session Moved by Jim Johnson, seconded by Phil Zietlow, to close the meeting to discuss union negotiations. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was closed at 9:30 p.m. to discuss labor negotiations. Moved by John Hamilton, seconded by Carolyn Smith, to close the executive session reopen the regular meeting at 10:12 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 25. Adjournment Moved by John Ferris, seconded by Carolyn Smith, to adjourn the meeting at 10:13 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Ferris, Mayor Attest: Paul R City Clerk -Treasurer Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 166 (THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY) Medina City Council Meeting Minutes September 21, 1999 16`8 ORDER CHECKS — SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 20129 Orchard Trust $ 1,312.00 20130 P.E.R.A. 3,050.58 20131 Void Check 0.00 20132-33 Air Touch Cellular 125.84 20134 AWWA 58.00 20135 B & B Products 341.77 20136 Biff's, Inc. 261.58 20137-38 Bonestroo,Rosene, Anderlik 13,280.98/ 20139 Bryan Rock Products 20,017.83` 20140 Budget Printing 1,647.63 20141 Case Credit 63.48 20142 Commercial Asphalt 1,455.25 20143 CPPR Prompt Training 431.24 V 20144 Cy's Uniforms 370.48 \ 6 20145 Thomas Dykhoff 42.82 I 20146 Rolf Erickson Enterprises, Inc. 3,216.20 20147 Rolf Erickson 105.00 20148 ESS Bros. & Sons. 632.61 20149 Glenwood Inglewood 83.85 20150 Gopher State One Call 166.25 20151 Grafix Shoppe 247.53 20152 Hamel Fire Dept 17,960.25 20153 Hawkins Water Treatment 60.00 20154 Holiday 102.61 20155 lmprest Fund 1,714.92 20156 Jordan Automotive 1,523.29 20157 Kennedy & Graven 8,233.26 20158 Lakeshore Weekly News 40.00 20159 Law Enforcement Labor Services 165.00 20160 Loretto Fire Dept. 9,384.50 20161 Maple Plain Fire 838.75 20162 Mayer Mobil 47.53 20163 Medica 196.70 20164 Medica Choice 4,320.42 20165 Medina Police Dept. Petty Cash 84.70 20166 Medronic Physio-Control 444.00 20167 Metro West Inspection 6,931.40 20168 Metro Council Env. Services 13,916.17 20169 Midwest Automotive 649.60 20170 Minn Comm 30.69 20171 Minnesota Child Support Pyt. Center 595.00 20172 Municipals — City of Stillwater 82.50 Mew ci:ifSyCCoaao¢ ilAVet8tgi fl iktGnp.ites 9ejnileen lye r189 `3199 9 188 ORDER CHECKS — SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 (CONT'D) 20173 Nextel West Corp 551.25 20174 Northern States Power 1,054.55 20175 James Nystrom 37.40 20176 Priority Courier Experts 43.10 20177 Safety Train 2,194.00 20178 Straight Line Autobody 2,048.71 20179 Tallen & Baertschi 2,875.93 20180 U.S. Filter/Waterpro 757.21 20181 U.S. West Communications 34.60 20182 Uniforms Unlimited 462.70 20183 Unum Provident 57.55 20184 Unum Life Ins. Co. of America 19.95 20185 Cec Vieau 31.24 19882 Westside Maintenance 1,825.00 19883 Wright -Hennepin Electric 74.69 $126,300.09 PAYROLL CHECKS — SEPTEMBER 13, 1999 16261 Paul A. Robinson $ 940.03 16262 Steven T. Scherer 1,044.84 16263 Christopher R. McGill 1,028.35 16264 Michael J. Rouillard 1,201.31 16265 Scott W. Kroeger 1,208.34 16266 James D. Dil!man 1,281.86 16267 Robert P. Dressel 951.96 16268 Edgar J. Belland 1,702.26 16269 Cecilia M. Vieau 925.46 16270 Laura L. Sulander 987.03 16271 Sandra L. Larson 792.18 16272 Jon D. Priem 1,329.67 16273 Jeremy L. Christenson 1,188.74 16274 James Nystrom 1,042.01 $15, 624.04 Medina OiWifovrtiaaiWiete4171141mdes Septbentier19991999