Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout19930512 - Agendas Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 93-10 Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Meeting 93-10 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:30 P.M. 330 Distel Circle Wednesday Los Altos, California May 12, 1993 (7:30) * ROLL CALL ** ORAL COMMUNICATIONS,-- Public ADOPTION OF AGENDA *** ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR -- B. Crowder APPROVAL OF MINUTES *** APril 28, 1993 (Consent Item) *** WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (Consent Item) BOARD BUSINESS (7:45) *** 1. Proposed Property Management Agreement with Peninsula Open Space Trust and Save the Redwoods League for the Former Phleger Property -- C. Britton (Consent Item) *** 2. Amendment to the Use and Management Plan for Long Ridge Open Space Preserve -- C. Britton (Consent Item) 3. Program Evaluation -- C. Britton (8:25) INFORMATIONAL REPORTS -- Directors and Staff *** REVISED CLAIMS Consent Item ( ) I CLOSED SESSION (Litigation, Land Negotiations, Labor Negotiations, and Personnel Matters) ADJOURNMENT Open Space . . . for room to breathe • 20th Anniversary 1972-1992 r 330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone:415-691-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485 e General Manager:Herbert Grench Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wirn de Wit i *NOTE: Times are estimated and items may appear earlier or later than listed. Agenda is subject to change of order. ** TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: The Chair will invite public comment on agenda items at the time each item is considered by the Board of Directors. You may address the Board concerning other matters during oral communications. Each speaker will ordinarily be limited to 3 minutes. When recognized, please begin by stating your name and address. Please fall out the speaker's form so your name and address can be accurately included in the minutes. Alternately, you may comment to the Board by a written communication, which the Board appreciates. ***All items on the consent calendar shall be approved without discussion by one motion unless a Board member removes an item from the consent calendar for separate discussion A member o the public request under oral communications that an item be removed e f e p l ay ea nd from the consent calendar. NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS The Gillis Policy Committee will meet on Friday, May 21, 1993 beginning at 12:00 noon at the District office. The purpose of the meeting will be to review and revise the District's gifts li po cy The 20th Anniversary Committee will meet on Friday, May 21, 1993 beginning at 1:30 p.m. at the District office. The purpose of the meeting will be to plan events celebrating the District's twentieth anniversary. Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Meeting 93-09 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS April 28, 1993 MINUTES I. ROLL CALL President Betsy Crowder called the meeting to order at 7 : 34 P.M. Members Present: Pete Siemens, Robert McKibbin, Wim de Wit, Ginny Babbitt, and Betsy Crowder. Members Absent: Nonette Hanko and Teena Henshaw Personnel Present: Craig Britton, Jean Fiddes, John Escobar, Randy Anderson, Malcolm Smith, Del Woods, Mary Gundert, Sheryl Marioni Cochran, Carleen Bruins, Stanley Norton, Patty Quillin, and Emma Johnson. II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were no oral communications. III. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Edward Emling, 11853 Murietta Lane, Los Altos Hills requested that the agenda item concerning the appointment of acting general manager be removed from the consent calendar. B. Crowder requested that the written communications to George Norton and Julie Duncan be removed from the consent calendar. Motion: G. Babbitt moved that the Board adopt the agenda as amended. W. de Wit seconded the motion. The motion passed 5 to 0. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: P. Siemens moved that the Board adopt the balance of the consent calendar including: the minutes of April 14, 1993 ; response to written communication dated March 31, 1993 from Sally Boyd, Frank Frederick, Mary O'Rourke, and David and Vaness Bome, all of Britton Heights, San Carlos; response to written communication dated April 8 from Tom Arkwright, 1 Bay Hill Place Half Moon Bay; the Award of Contract for the Picchetti Blacksmith Shop Restoration Project; Award of Contract for Weeks Road Project at La Honda Creek Open Space Preserve; and Resolutions 93-13 Amending Rules of Procedure, Resolution 93-14 Establishing Financial Instrument Signatories of the District for Santa Clara County Accounts, Resolution 93-15 Authorizing Signing and Endorsing Checks and Other Instruments for Checking Account (First Interstate Bank of California - Los Altos) , Resolution 93-16 Authorizing Signing of Payroll Checks for Payroll Checking Account (First Interstate Meeting 93-09 Page 2 Bank of California - Los Altos) , and 93-17 Establishing Signatories for Entering Safe Deposit Boxes (First Interstate Bank of California - Los Altos) ; and Revised Claims 93-07. G. Babbitt seconded the motion. The motion passed 5 to 0. V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS B. Crowder requested that the letters to George Norton and Julie Duncan be revised to include a sentence that they could call her if they had further questions, as well as a reference to Mr. Norton's longtime relationship with the District. Motion: P. Siemens moved the approval of the written communications. G. Babbitt seconded the motion. The motion passed 5 to 0. VI. BOARD BUSINESS A. Introduction of 1993 Spring Docent Training Class (Report R- 93-55L C. Bruins reported that changes have been made to the docent educational program, with a spring and fall training sessions. She said the sessions are more intensive. P. Quillin noted that eleven trainees have finished the classroom study and field exploration and three have completed the fall training module which qualifies them to join the docent team. She introduced the members of the class to the Board. B. Crowder congratulated the docents and thanked them for being an important part of visitor contacts for the District. B. Appointment of Acting General Manager (Report R-93-57) Edward Emling, R.W. Caughlin, 10836 West Loyola Drive, Los Altos Hills, and Harry Block, 11751 Winding Way, Los Altos Hills questioned the need to have an acting general manager. P. Siemens noted that the District is required by the state to have a general manager. Motion: G. Babbitt moved that the Board approve the agreement appointing L. Craig Britton Acting General Manager. P. Siemens seconded the motion. The motion passed 5 to 0. President Crowder called a recess of the meeting at 8: 00 P.M. and reconvened the meeting at 8: 15 P.M. C. Workshop - Continued Discussion on Filling of General Manager's Position (R-93-59) P. Siemens noted that the list for characteristics desirable in a new general manager were generated at the previous workshop held on April 14 . Geoff Ball, facilitator for the workshop, said that the task at hand is to continue to refine the various characteristics of a general manager and rank importance of the criteria. He suggested the Board vote on each of the characteristics as to whether they are a: "Must" (something that, if the candidate did not meet the criteria or have the Meeting 93-09 Page 3 characteristic in significant degree, the candidate simply wasn't to be considered) ; "Want" (things that are very important but wouldn't necessarily disqualify a person) ; "Nice" (great if they also had this) ; and Set Aside (not sure what characteristic is/means -- put aside for now) . He said that characteristics generated at the April 14 meeting could be moved to a different group of characteristics and that wording could be up-graded or refined. Geoff Ball asked for additional characteristics that the public would like to propose. The additions were incorporated into the list, some characteristics were moved to more appropriate categories, and then Board members rated each characteristic into the categories of Must, Want, Nice and Set Aside. The list was then distributed. E. Emling asked if it would be possible for members of the public to participate in some way in the initial screening of candidates. B. Crowder noted that it has been suggested that a Board committee or Board committee and a blue ribbon committee or a blue ribbon committee be used to narrow the field of candidates. She said that decision has not yet been made. B. Crowder stated the Board's consensus to schedule another workshop for May 26 and that individual Board members submit changes to the list and job description to staff by May 12 for consolidation and editing. P. Siemens noted that there are principles in the Sipel study that the Board may want to articulate but may not want to continue using that title because everyone is not familiar with the study. The Board concurred that "organizational improvement plan" appropriately describes the focus of the study. VII. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS W. de Wit reported he had attended a meeting moderated by San Mateo County Supervisor Mary Griffin on the state budget. He said it was attended by many mayors, chamber of commerce representatives, union, and realtors who are against the state shifting money away from local government. He said he had received the J.C. Penny Golden Rule Award and an award from the Junior League of Palo Alto. G. Babbitt said that the volunteer recognition event was very successful with good attendance and a good hike. B. Crowder reported that she and R. Anderson met with current tenants of Thornewood to discuss items of mutual concern and said the committee should meet again. She also suggested that the Dog Committee schedule a meeting. C. Britton reported that money has been budgeted for one Board member to attend the special Park Districts Forum in Akron, Ohio in June. The Board agreed that no Board member would attend in the interest of conserving budget funds. Meeting 93-09 Page 4 J. Escobar reported an injury accident to a hiker at Picchetti Ranch Area. He also noted that the City of Mountain View will be the dispatcher for the District's radio communication system starting May 1. R. Anderson reported that the mitigation enhancement grant was recommended for funding, but at a level below available grants in northern California and therefore, not likely to be funded. He said the ISTEA grant was ranked medium priority in funding but many more projects were ranked higher so it will probably not be funded either. M. Smith reported that a new general information brochure has been printed and distributed a copy to each Board member. VIII. CLOSED SESSION C. Britton announced that litigation matters to be discussed in Closed Session fell under Section 54956.9 (c) , potential litigation, and land negotiation matters to be discussed were (1) Santa Clara County assessor's parcel number 351-08-29 owner Peninsula Open Space negotiated with Audrey Rust; (2) Santa Cruz County parcel assessor's parcel number 088-221-04 owner Sempervirens Fund negotiated with Veryl Claussen; and (3) San Mateo County assessor's parcel number 078-270-030 owners Al and Dorothy Wool negotiated with Al Wool. The Board recessed to Closed Session on litigation, land negotiation, and personnel matters at 10:44 P.M. Ix. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11: 34 P.M. Emma Johnson Recording Secretary Maims No. 93-07 Meetir 1-09 Date: it 28, 1993 REVISED MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT # Name Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4127 50.00 Asbestest, Inc. Asbestos Test 4128 _ 60.00 M. L. Buckmaster Cleaning--Incerpi House 4129 612.50 Building Abatement Analytics Asbestos Consulting Services 4130 125.00 California Park and Recreation Support for ISTEA Program Society 4131 113.54 California Water Service Company Water Service 4132 39.18 Crest Copies, Inc. Bluelines 4133 235.48 Communication and Control, Inc. Water Pump Power Service 4134 910.00 Daily Pacific Builder Advertisement 4135 510.00 Divine Catering Catering--Volunteer Recognition Event 4136 168.64 Dorfman-Pacific Company, Inc. Uniform Expense 4137 183.20 Egghead Software Computer Software Upgrade 4138 2,643.08 David B. Fisher Legal Services 4139 431.76 Foster Bros.Security Systems,Inc. Locks and Keys 4140 600.00 Nancy Gordon Development of Art Exhibit 4141 327.14 Herbert Grench Reimbursement--Out-of-Town Meeting Expense 4142 852.88 Carroll Harrington Consulting Services--20th.Anniversar^y 4143 352.00 Honeywell Inc. Maintenance Agreement 4144 225.00 Dennis Kobza & Associates Architectural Services--Rancho Ranger Office 4145 211.09 McGrath RentCorp Skyline Field Office Rental 4146 25.00 Motorola Antenna Site Rental 4147 50.00 National Recreation and Park Subscription Association 4148 151.20 Noble Ford Tractor, Inc. Tractor Repairs 4149 7.69 Norney's of Mountain View Office Supplies 4150 996.04 Orchard Supply Hardware Field Supplies 4151 174.11 Pacific Bell Telephone Service 4152 500.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Deposit--Engineering Services at Rancho Ranger Office 4153 1,859.29 Page and Turnbull Architectural Services--Picchetti 4153 30.00 Palo Alto Weekly Advertisement 4154 55.00 Warren Phillips Reimbursement--Conference Registration 267.65 Pip Printing Printing--Hikes and Walks 4155 159.17 Pitney Bowes Credit Corporation Postage Meter Rental 4156 54.11 Post Tool Equipment Part 4157 2,719.27 Roy's Repair Service Vehicle Repairs and Maintenance 4158 143.40 Santa Clara County Center Professional Services--Parcel Research for Urban Analysis 4159 250.00 Santa Clara County Environmental Health Permit--Fuel Storage Tank Health Department 4160 104.87 Malcolm Smith Registration and Resolution Frames 4161 150.00 * Society of Human Resource Conference Registration--D.Dolan Management 4162 746.64 Teater & Etc. Sign and Map Revisions 4163 84.69 University Art Drafting Supplies 4164 536.83 Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. Ravenswood Salt Pond Enhancement-Plan 4165 88.60 Joan Young Reimbursement--Beverages and Refreshment:. for Volunteer Event and Projects 4166 307.36 Petty Cash Film and Developing, Office and Field Supplies, Local and Out-of-Town Meeting Expense and Private Vehicle Expense *Urgent check issued on April 20, 1993. I RESPONSE ACTION PROPOSED BY STAFF Board President Acknowledge/Rasp Director Acknowledge/, .d Staff Acknowledge/Respond Draft Response Attached -- Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft - Response for Board Consideration per Board Directive(s) No Response Necessary APR 2 81993 -- --- IF 04d, OW 0I lie i =--- ---- =_ -- -- - - --- -- _ -- T&_q—L4 07 27 el. pYn Tba" 21 Wv , Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT DRAFT RESPONSE PREPARED BY STAFF FOR BOARD CONSIDERATION Stephanie Sheehan 827 Miller Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Protection of Devil's Canyon - San Mateo County , Dear Ms. Sheehan: ' I received your letter regarding the wonderful open space qualities of Devil's Canyon in San Mateo County, and the need for its protection. The board and staff of the District are well aware of the scenic qualities and sensitive resources of this area, which we typically refer to as the Acronico Property, after the owner's name. We agree that the acquisition of this site for public open space would be extremely desirable. It would make an excellent addition to the adjacent 900 acre Long Ridge Open Space Preserve. We have been negotiating with the owner of this property for some time, and hope eventually to acquire it. The District's financial ability to,acquire property is currently constrained by several large and significant land purchases that have been made or committed. Our finances may be further constrained if the state retains a significant portion of the District's tax revenues to balance its budget, as has been proposed. One bright spot on the horizon is an initiative proposed by the California Planning and Conservation League, which may be placed on the ballot in June, 1994. This measure would provide almost$1.9 billion statewide to continue the acquisition, protection and improvement of parks and open space lands. The District would get a significant amount of money that would allow us to complete key purchases like Acronico/Devil's Canyon. Until that time you can be assured that we are doing everything in our power to secure the protection of this beautiful and sensitive property from development. Thank you for your interest in the District and its open space program. Sincerely, Betsy Crowder President, Board of Directors �BC/RA/dmz cc: Board of Directors Open Space . . . for room to breathe 0 20th Anniversary 1972-1992 330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 9402 2-1 404 • Phone: 415-691-1200 • FAX:415-691-0485 General Manager:Herbert Grench Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit Ft REaSPON<T ACTION PROPOSED BY STAFF Bord ident Acknowledge/Respond Director Acknowledge/Respond Saff Acknowledga/Respond t Draft Response Attached J Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft Response for Board Consideration per Board Directive(s) No Response Necessary -•� APR J199324 - -- aL-4 .Inx'n �� vim_ tw-t4� 'wL, --f- It4 t �'r?�cc,c�, -fie _.���e�¢in._��►-�.� `-(�_..._..w_��:._ Zq - ......,ter.........._ �,4 Open Space 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT DRAFT RESPONSE PREPARED BY STAFF FOR BOARD CONSIDERATION Kirk Gallaway 23900 Hutchinson Road Los Gatos, CA 95030 Subject: Protection of Devil's Canyon - San Mateo County Dear Mr. Gallaway: The District's Board of Directors received your letter regarding the wonderful open space qualities of Devil's Canyon in San Mateo County, and the need for its protection. The board and staff of the District are well aware of the scenic qualities and sensitive resources of this area. We agree that acquisition of this site for public open space would be extremely desirable. It would make an excellent addition to the adjacent 900 acre Long Ridge Open Space Preserve. The District has been negotiating with the owner of this property for some time, and hope eventually to acquire it. The District's financial ability to acquire property is currently constrained by several large and significant land purchases that have been made or committed. Our finances may be further limited if the state retains a significant portion of the District's tax revenues to balance its budget, as has been proposed. One bright spot on the horizon is an initiative proposed by the California Planning and Conservation League, which may be placed on the ballot in June, 1994. This measure would provide almost$1.9 billion statewide to continue the acquisition, protection and improvement of parks and open space lands. The District would get a significant amount of money that would allow us to complete key purchases such as Devil's Canyon. You can be assured that the District will be watching this property relative to ownership changes and development pressures, with the hope of buying this property when the District's financial situation improves. Thank you for your interest in the District and its open space program Sincerely, Betsy Crowder President, Board of Directors BC/RA/dmz cc: Board of Directors Open Space . . . for room to breathe - 20fh Anniversary - - 1972-1992 330 Distel Circle - Los Altos, California 94022-1404 - Phone:415-691-1200 - FAX: 415-691-0485 General Manager:Herbert Grench Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit APR 3 p 1993 RESPONSE ACTION PROPOSED BY STAFF Board President Acknovledge/Respond Director Acknowledge/Respond Staff Acknowledge/Respond April 29, 1993 1--,- Draft Response Attached Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft Response for Board Consideration per Board Directivc(s) Board of Directors, MROSD _ No Response Necessary 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022-1404 Yesterday evening at your meeting I again sin had to complain about being unable to hear, and I was not the only one. I request that you immediatly do one of two things: 1 . All directors and staff take elocution lessons so that all members of the public at your meetings are able to hear what is said. 2. Install an adequate public address system with sufficient microphones for board, staff and public, to ensure that all members of the public hear " your proceedings. Harry H. Haeussler, Jr. 1094 Highland Circle Los Altos, CA 94024 Open Space 111111 1111.,1111,jjji MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT DRAFT RESPONSE PREPARED BY STAFF FOR BOARD CONSIDERATION Harry H. Hauessler, Jr. 1094 Highland Circle Los Altos, CA 94024 Dear Harry: The District Board and staff have been attempting to solve the voice amplification problem you addressed in your letter of April 29. We are continuing to look for a solution that is adequate, simple to operate, and economical. The staff has encountered problems in attempting to improve the sound because of the size of the room. As you have said, it is too large for everyone to be heard throughout the room without amplifiers. It also seems to be too small for a full system that would not require technical support during meetings; and there was significant feedback when we set up a mid-range system. The Board's meetings are an important opportunity for you and other interested members of the public to hear District reports and discussions. We recognize, as well, that the meetings are your opportunity to be heard. Please be assured that we are committed to improving the situation. Thank you for your continuing interest in the District. Sincerely, Betsy Crowder, President Board of Directors BC/dz Open Space . . . for room to breathe 20th Anniversary - 1972-1992 330 Distel Circle - Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 - FAX:415-691-0485 (!D General Manager:Herbert Gren(h Board ofDirectors:Pete Siemens,Robert M(Kibbin, Teena Renshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette I lanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit Michael & Sharon Reich 205 Georgia Lane �'Y Portola Valley, CA 94028 (415) 851-3868 RESPONSE ACTION PROPDSED BY STAFF Board President Acknowledge/Respond Director Acknowledge/Respond April29, 1993 Staff Acknowledge/Respond' Draft Response Attached MRC>SD Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft 330 Dlatel Circle Response for'Board Consideration per Board Directive(s) Los Altos, CA 94022 No Response Necessary RE: Mariani Ranch,proposed development Dear Sir/Madam: As residents of Portola Valley, we are extremely concerned about the potential development of the Mariani Ranch property. We moved to Portola Valley to enjoy the lack of congestion, rural setting and open space. Portola Valley is one of the few remaining suburban areas which has successfully deterred over-development and preserved open spaces in their natural state. We strongly urge your support in preventing destruction of our open spaces in order to preserve the beauty and tranquillity of Portola Valley life as we now know it and for future generations. We feel that the environmental, public safety and planning issues raised by this proposed development deserves serious and in-depth consideration. It is our intent to take whatever actions are appropriate in order to help preserve the Mariani Ranch property, Portola Valley overall and the surrounding open spaces. We hope thatA the Portola Valley Planning Commission possesses the good judgment and insight necessary to deter further development activity which would forever destroy our area while presenting future generations with significant problems to resolve as a result of over-development. Very truly yours, Michael A. Reich I� Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT DRAFT RESPONSE PREPARED BY STAFF FOR BOARD CONSIDERATION Michael & Sharon Reich 205 Georgia Lane Portola Valley, CA 94028 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Reich: The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District considered your letter relative to the proposed Blue Oak Subdivision development of the Portola Valley Partners property, also known as the former Mariani property. At our meeting of January 28, 1993, members of the Committee to Save the Mariani Ranch gave us an excellent presentation on the property and its desirability for preservation as permanent open space. Also, the agenda for our meeting of May 26, 1993 is proposed to include a presentation by the Open Space Advocates group to bring the Board up to date on the status on several properties in San Mateo County, including the Mariani property. While this property does not connect with any District holdings, we are certainly sympathetic to any local efforts to preserve portions, or all, of this land as permanent open space. Because of the District's focus on regional open space projects and the present lack of funds, we cannot offer any District acquisition money. However, we have directed staff to work with the committee on funding alternatives, which we hope will prove to be fruitful. The District might be willing to participate in the management of the property, or even hold title, should it be acquired as a result of local preservation efforts. Thank you for your interest in the District and it's open space programs, if you desire further information, please don't hesitate to cal me, my home number is 851-0410. Sincerely, i Betsy Crowder President, Board of Directors cc: Board of Directors Open Space . . . for room to breathe 20th Anniversary 1972-1992 330 Distel Circle - Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485 Genera/Manages Herbert Gfench Boarc140irectors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Ieena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wini de Wit Open Space 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT R-93-62 Meeting 93-10 May 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM Proposed Property Management Agreement with Peninsula Open Space Trust and Save-the- Redwoods League for the Former Phleger Property ACTING GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Board President to sign the attached property management agreements for the former Phleger property. DISCUSSION On August 5, 1991, Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST) acquired the 1,224-acre Phleger property in San Mateo County. POST acquired the property for eventual transfer to the National Park Service for inclusion in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. Fee title to a 203-acre portion of the property is currently held by Save-the-Redwoods League (SRL) to secure their contribution to the project. In the interim, POST and Save-the-Redwoods League have asked the District to manage the property in conjunction with the ongoing management of the surrounding open space preserves (see attached April 12, 1993 letter from Audrey C. Rust, Executive Director, Peninsula Open Space Trust). Description The property is located north of Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve and borders Huddart County Park to the east. Access is limited to the existing Woodside Trails Club trails. The only public road frontage is on Highway 35, Skyline Boulevard. Use and Management The property is currently closed to the public. Under the management agreement with POST and SRL, the District would be obligated to routinely patrol the property and to prohibit unauthorized use. Gates, fencing, and signs, if necessary, will be placed where appropriate. District staff has reviewed the management needs of the property with POST. Staff does not anticipate that management of this property will significantly impact the workload of the field staff. Trails on the property are used and maintained by the Woodside Trails Club. Under the management agreement, the club's historic involvement with the trails would continue. Open Space . . . for room to breathe 20th Anniversary • 1972-1992 330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone:415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485 General Manager:Herbert Grench Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Han ko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit R-93-62 Page 2 Other permitted uses would be: 1) Peninsula Open Space Trust and Save-the-Redwoods League may use the property for any purpose. 2) The National Park Service may use the property for ranger-led tours. 3) Gordon and Betty Moore, including their family and guests, may use the POST property for equestrian and pedestrian purposes. 4) Jean Phleger, including her family and guests, may use the POST property for equestrian and pedestrian purposes. Prepared by: John Escobar, Operations Manager Contact person: Same as above I i PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST 3000 SAND HILL ROAD,4-135 MENLO PARK,CALIFORNIA 94025 (415)854-7696 1 April 12, 1993 BOARD OF DIRECTORS James E.Baer Allan F Brown Mr, L. Craig Britton Patricia A.Compton Vince S.Garrod Mid peninsula Regional Open Space District Christina A.Holloway 330 Distel Circle Melvin B.Lane Norman E.Matteoni Los Altos,CA 94022-1404 David W.Mitchell F.Ward Paine Dear Craig: Anne M.Westerfield ADVISORY COUNCIL Peninsula Open Space Trust requests the assistance of the Midpeninsula Marilyn Alberding Robert Augsburger Regional Open Space District in providing interim property management of the Eleanor Boushey former Phelger property. Sheldon Breiner Robert V.Brown William H.Clark We are working to move the property into the ownership of the National Sue Crane Lois Crozier-Hogle Park Service and,if successful we are advised that it is likely to take two years Laurence Dawson before the $10.5 million we have requested is achieved and ownership of the Herbert J.Dangler entire property is transferred. With a staff of five POST does not have the J.Philip DiNapoli Phyllis Draper ability to any regular patrol or oversight of the land during this interim period, Clarence J. Ferrari,Jr. David L. Fletcher Thomas W.Ford The property is currently closed to the public. Its trails are used and John Freidenrich maintained by the Woodside Trails Association, a group with which you are Sukey Grousbeck Rosemary Hewlett familiar. Under our enclosed Property Management Agreement we propose Patricia L.Hooper their historic involvement with and use of the trails continue. We do not Eleanor Huggins Suzanne B. King propose that the property be open to the public at this time. Robert C.Kirkwood Richard C.Livermore Robert W.McIntyre Please let me know if you need additional information to discuss this George M.Marcus matter with your Board of Directors. Anthony P.Meier Robert H.Miller James E.Mitchell Thanks for your help. Gordon E.Moore Bette Moorman Alan H.Nichols Sincerely, Susan P.Orr Paul O.Reimer Barbara Doyle Roupe William F.Scandling Fritz Snicleman Geraldine F.Steinberg Audrey C. ust Susan S.Ware Rosemary Young Executive Director EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Audrey C.Rust recycled paper PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FORMER PHLEGER PROPERTY This agreement is made on the day of 1993 by and between Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, a public agency, hereinafter called "DISTRICT" and Peninsula Open Space Trust, a public benefit corporation, hereinafter called "POST". WHEREAS, on or about August 5, 1991, POST acquired the so called "Phleger Property" (San Mateo County Assessors parcel numbers 067-280-150 and 067-280-160), as further described in Exhibit "A" as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, hereinafter called the "Subject Property" or "Property," and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is near DISTRICT land and DISTRICT desires to participate in the acquisition of the Property for public park purposes in the future. Until that time POST desires that DISTRICT immediately manage the Property until such time as a public agency acquires the Property, and WHEREAS, this Agreement details the management responsibility of DISTRICT during the period prior to acquisition of the Subject Property by a public agency, and NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed, as follows: 1. Management. DISTRICT shall be responsible for management of the entire approximately 1,224 acre Subject Property for that period of time from the date of final execution of this Agreement until a public agency acquires fee title ownership of the Subject Property from POST. 2. Patrol. DISTRICT will routinely patrol and manage the Property in a manner consistent with nearby DISTRICT holdings to ensure that the Property is kept in a safe and sanitary condition, that the land is free from public trespass, and that off- road vehicles or other deleterious uses of the Property are prohibited. Should any trespass or other unauthorized use of the Property occur, DISTRICT will be responsible for correcting these matters including, where necessary, enforcing DISTRICT ordinances on the Subject Property. The property shall be deemed to be property under the control of District for purposes of Public Resource Code Section 5558. 3. Uses. DISTRICT and POST shall specify uses permitted on the property in other documents as necessary. 4. Legal Responsibility and Indemnification. DISTRICT shall have full legal responsibility for management and operation of the Subject Property and the condition thereof and for all activities conducted thereon, and in this respect DISTRICT shall I Property Management Agreement Page 2 Phleger Property in and all claim or liability for hold POST harmless from and defend POST against any y injury or damage to any persons or property whatsoever occurring in, on or about the Subject Property arising out of an condition of the Subject Property or of any act, J Pe Y Y employees, or invitees. fault r mission of DISTRICT its agents,ne lect auto omission 5. Termination. Either party, upon 30 days written notice, may for any cause withdraw from the terms and obligations of this agreement. MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: i SPACE DISTRICT: by by President, Board of Directors Audrey C. Rust, Executive Director Attest: District Clerk J PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FORMER PHLEGER PROPERTY LIST OF PERMITTED USES 1. The Woodside Trails Club may continue to use and maintain the existing trails on the Property for equestrian use. 2. Peninsula Open Space Trust and Save-the-Redwoods League may use the Property for any Purpose. 3. The National Park Service may use the Property for ranger led tours. 4. Gordon and Betty Moore including their family and guests, may use the Property for equestrian and pedestrian purposes. 5. Jean Phleger including her family and guests, may use the Property for equestrian and pedestrian purposes. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: A FEE as to Parcels I & II; AN EASEMENT as to Parcels III, IV, V, VI The land referred to in this Report is situated in the State of California, County of San Mateo, and is described as follows: PARCEL I: All that certain real property situated in the Rancho Canada De Raymundo, County of San Mateo, State of California, described as follows: BEING a portion of that certain Parcel of land described in the Deed to Mary Elena Phleger recorded October 28, 1947, in Book 1418 at page 428, Official Records of San Mateo County, further described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the Northeasterly Right of Way line of Skyline Boulevard, also being State Highway 55 as shown on Right of Way recorded Map R-519.6, said point being at station 307+24.72; thence leaving said Right-Of-Way line, North 33° 00' 00" East, 1,670.00 feet; thence North 39° 26' 26" West, 5,743.94 feet to a point in the Northerly boundary line of that Parcel described in said Deed (1418 O.R. 428); thence along said boundary line the following 5 courses: 1) South 47° 16' 37" West, 424.86 feet; 2) South V 27' 02" East, 341.36 feet; 3) South 13° 25' 55" West, 324.49 feet; 4) South 42° 44' 41" West, 439.66 feet; and 5) South 65° 10' 04" West, 156.17 feet to a point in the Southwesterly line of said Rancho Canada De Raymundo; thence along said Rancho Line, South 37' 37' 54" East, 1,579.70 feet to a point in the aforementioned Northeasterly Right-Of-Way line of Skyline Boulevard; thence along said Right-Of-Way line the following three courses: 1) South 45° 38' 43" East, 555.50 feet; 2) Southerly along the arc of a tangent, 2,350.25 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 21° 37' 16", an arc distance of 886.88 feet; and 3) South 24° 01' 27" East, 1,445.73 feet to a point that bears North 24' 01' 27" West, 350.00 feet from a point on said Northeasterly Right-Of-Way line at Station 305+85.81; thence leaving said Northeasterly Right- Of-Way line, North 65" 58' 33" East, 260.00 feet; thence South 46° 45' 55" East, 220.00 feet; thence South 28° 14' 17" East, 350.00 feet; thence South 17° 34' 30" West, 280.00 feet to a point on the aforementioned Northeasterly Right-Of-Way line; thence along said Right-Of-Way line the following three courses: 1) Easterly along the arc of a 550.06 foot radius curve to the left, the center of which curve bears North 17° 34' 30" East, through a central angle of 50 12' 30", an arc distance of 50.00 feet; 2) South 77° 38' 00" East, 228.11 feet; and 3) Easterly along the arc of a 1,050.11 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 19' 58' 05", an arc distance of 365.97 feet to the point of beginning. Said Parcel is also known as Parcel 2 as shown on that certain map entitled "RECORD OF SURVEY OF A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF THE LANDS OF PHLEGER (1418 O.R. 428) AND THE LANDS OF KINGS MOUNTAIN LINT N VOLUNTEER FIRE BRIGADE, INC. (6746 O.R. 258)", filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California on August 5, 1991 in Book 13 of Record of Survey Maps at Pages 108 thru 112 inclusive. EXHIB T Fags _ 9'f i PARCEL II• All that certain real property situated in the Rancho Canada De Raymundo, County of San Mateo, Stz'.c� of California, described as follows: BEING a portion of that certain parcel of land described in the Deed to Mary Elena Phleger recorded October 28, 1947, in Book 1418 at page 428, Official Records of San Mateo County, further described as follows: BEGINNING at the most Southerly corner of that certain Parcel of land described as Parcel 31- A in the Deed to the City and County of San Francisco, recorded March 3, 1930, in Book 491 at page 1, Official Records of San Mateo County; thence along the Southwesterly boundary line of said Parcel 31-A, also being the Northeasterly boundary line of said Phleger Parcel, the following 7 courses: 1) North 51* 52' 22" West, 584.50 feet; 2) North 25' 11' 27" West, 815.32 feet; 3) North 50' 53' 04" West, 1,493.94 feet; 4) North 36° 39' 43" West, 753.47 feet; 5) South 80° 55' 05" West, 576.67 feet; 6) North 670 25' 38" West, 166.60; and 7) North 45° 40' 57" West, 245.23 feet; thence leaving said common boundary line, South 84° 07' 15" West, 37.27 feet; thence South 76' 09' 56" West, 100.83 feet; thence South 34° 06' 31" West, 71.14 feet; thence South 00 21' 47" East, 84.29 feet; thence South 80 15' 20" East, 87.86 feet; thence South 40' 21' 12" West, 164.08 feet; thence North 51* 34' 38" West, 146.79 feet; thence North 86° 08' 21" West, 127.78 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as point "F"; thence North 85° 10' 13" West, 252.10 feet; thence South 88° 14' 36" West, 178.61 feet; thence North 89° 17' 34" West, 328.98 feet; thence North 78° 50' 51" West, 135.72 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "C"; thence North 55° 21' 32" West, 224.71 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "B"; thence North 290 29' 11" West, 68.73 feet; thence North 30 14' 31" East, 77.09 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A"; thence North 46° 10' 43" West, 164.34 feet to a point in the Southerly boundary line of Parcel One, as shown on that certain Parcel Map filed August 14, 1974, in Book 25 of Parcel Maps at page 45, Official Records of San Mateo County; thence along said Southerly boundary line the following 10 courses: 1) North 33* 37' 02" West, 219.54 feet; 2) North 400 37' 59" West, 247.95 feet; 3) North 59° 38' 11" West, 117.76 feet; 4) North 88° 36' 13" West, 180.72 feet; 5) North 65° 23' 08" West, 192.80 feet; 6) North 790 21' 37" West, 201.53 feet; 7) North 770 37' 45" West, 269.28 feet; 8) South 89' 23' 57" West, 170.89 feet; 9) South 85° 58' 26" West, 233.68 feet; and 10) North 4° 16' 17" West, 268.80 feet to a point on the aforementioned common boundary line of said Parcel 31 A and said Phleger Parcel; thence continuing along said common boundary line, the following 12 courses: 1) South 80° 18' 52" West, 164.13 feet; 2) North 81° 11' 38" West, 608.30 feet; 3) North 680 51' 23" West, 307.57 feet; 4) South 870 09' 12" West, 664.29 feet; 5) North 860 34, 12" West, 505.67 feet; 6) South 64' 18' 37" West, 518.35 feet; 7) South 760 00' 10" West, 720.34 feet; 8) South 72' 41' 14" West, 683.45 feet; 9) South 520 35' 41" West, 968.81 feet; 10) South 76° 09' 09" West, 144.70 feet; 11) South 35° 25' 23" West, 595.20 feet; and 12) South 160 35' 37" West, 171.15 feet; thence leaving the said common boundary line, South 390 26' 26" East, 5,743.94 feet to a point which lies North 330 00' 00" East, 1,670.00 feet from a point on the Northeasterly Right-Of-Way line of Skyline Boulevard, also known as State Highway Route 55, as shown on Right-Of-Way Record Map R-519.6, said Right-Of-Way Point being located at station 307+24.72; thence North 330 00' 00" East, 3,839.21 feet; thence South 570 00' 00" East, 1,500.00 feet to the Southerly line of said Phleger EXHID T � 1 Page !! ®f r I Parcel (1418 O.R. 423); thence along said Southerly boundary line, also being the Northerly boundary line of that certain Parcel of land known as Huddart Park as described in the Deed to the County of San Mateo recorded May 3, 1946, in B,��k 1282 at page 72, Official Records of San Mateo County; .-hence along said common bounda_-ti line the following 32 courses: 1) North 40" 48' 31" East, 125.40 feet; 2) North 62° 18' 31" East, 118.80 feet; 3) North 770 48' 31" East 171.60 feet; 4) North 800 18' 31" East, 231.00 feet; 5) North 640 18' 31" East, 132.00 feet; 6) North 730 18' 31" East, 118.80 feet; 7) South 82° 1 V 29" East, 112.20 feet; 8) North 760 18' 31" East, 99.00 feet; 9) North 72° 48' 31" East 132.00 feet; 10) North 64° 33' 31" East, 264.00 feet; 11) North 86° 1 V 31" East, 227.70 feet; 12) South 77' 38' 29" East, 376.20 feet; 13) South 720 11' 29" East, 224.40 feet; 14) South 860 26, 29" East, 132.00 feet; 15) South 81° 56' 29" East, 343.20 feet; 16) South 590 11' 29" East 118.80 feet; 17) South 49° 11' 29" East, 145.20 feet; 18) South 530 26' 29" East, 231.00 feet; 19) South 68' 41' 29" East, 99.00 feet; 20) South 76° 41' 29" East, 105.60 feet; 21) South 61° 41' 29" East, 85.80 feet; 22) South 370 35' 29" East, 89.10 feet; 23) North 77' 18' 31" East, 124.74 feet; 24) South 12" I P 29" East, 69.96 feet; 25) South 39' 03' 31" West, 162.36 feet; 26) South 73' 1 V 29", East, 182.16 feet; 27) South 370 26' 29" East, 141.90 feet; 28) South 56° 56' 29" East, 80.52 feet; 29) South 36' 26' 29" East, 225.72 feet; 30) North 87 48' 31" East, 62.04 feet; 31) South 10° 41' 29" East, 106.92 feet; and 32) South 22" 11' 29" East 66.60 feet to the Southeasterly boundary line of said Phleger Parcel, also being the Northwesterly boundary line of Tract No. 567, as shown on that certain map filed December 10. 1946 in Volume 26 at page 39, Official Records of San Mateo County; thence along said line. North 50° 33' 38" East, 1,327.40 feet to the point of beginning. Said Parcel is also known as Parcel 3 as shown on that certain map entitled "RECORD OF SURVEY OF A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF THE LANDS OF PHLEGER (1418 O.R. 428) r AND THE LANDS OF KINGS MOUNTAIN VOLL�'TEER FIRE BRIGADE, INC. (6746 O.R. 258)", filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California on August 5, 1991 in Book 13 of Record of Survey Niaps at Pages 108 thru 112 inclusive. PARCEL IH: AN EASEMENT for ingress and egress purposes desi-ribed as follows: A portion of Lot 1, as shown on that certain Map of T;a.t No. 567, filed December 10, 1946, in Volume 26 at page 39, Official Records of San Ma:_-�_) County, further described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of commerce of that certain_ parcel of land as described in the Deed to Mary Elena Phleger recorded August 18, 1978, on Rr:17772 at Image 1691, Official Records of San Mateo County, said point of beginning being a pint in the Northwesterly line of said Lot 1; thence Easterly and Southerly along the arc of a tangnmt, 65.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 79° 59' 00", an arc distance of 90.75 feet; thence South 49" 25' 48" East 146.43 feet; thence Southerly along the arc of a tangent, 20.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 90' 00' 00", arc disiance of 31.42 feet to a point on the otpage f Northerly line of Raymundo Drive; thence along said line, North 400 3.4' 12" East, 80.01 feet; thence leaving said line, North 49° 25' 48" West, 210.36 feet to a point in said Northwesterly line of Lot 1; thence along said line, South 500 36' 12" West, 115.46 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL IV: AN EASEMENT for ingress and egress purposes described as follows-- A strip of land 60.00 feet in width, the centerline of which is described as follows: COMMENCING at the most Northerly corner of that certain Parcel of land described in the M Elena Phle er recorded August 18 1978 on Reel 7772 at Image 1691 Official Deed to Mary g g g , Records of San Mateo County; thence along the Northerly prolongation of the Northeasterly line of said Parcel, North 49° 25' 48" West, 30.47 feet to a point on a line parallel with and 30.00 feet distant Northerly of the Northwesterly line of Tract No. 567, as shown on that certain map filed in volume 26 at page 39, Official Records of San Mateo County, said point being the true point of beginning of this description; thence South 50° 35' 12" West, 634.45 feet; thence Westerly along the arc of a tangent, 220.02 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 88° 07' 00", an arc distance of 338.37 feet; thence North 41` 17' 48" West, 247.96 feet; thence Westerly along the arc of a tangent, 92.22 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 97" 25' 00", an arc distance of 156.80 feet; thence South 41° 17' 12" West, 138.55 feet; thence Southwesterly along the arc of tangent, 260.85 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 21° 43' 00" an arc distance of 98.87 feet; thence South 19° 34' 12" West, 76.05 feet; thence Southwesterly along the arc of a tangent, 129.60 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 83° I V 00", an arc distance of I M.16 feet; thence North 77° 14' 48" West, 383.70 feet; thence Westerly and Southerly along the are of a tangent, 87.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 159° 55' 00", an are distance of 242.82 feet; thence South 57° 09' 48" East, 155.35 feet; thence Southerly along the arc of a tangent, 138.27 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 98° 20" 00", an arc distance of 237.30 feet; thence South 41' 10' 12" West, 72.74 feet; thence Southerly along the arc of a tangent, 242.50 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 23° 18' 00", an arc distance of 98.62 feet; thence South 17° 52' 12" West 81.00 feet; thence Southerly along the arc of a tangent, 121.92 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 72° 53' 0011 , an arc distance of 155.09 feet; thence North 89' 14' 48" West, 31.90 feet; thence Southerly along the arc of a tangent, 113.79 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 55' 36' 00" an arc distance of 110.42 feet; thence South 35° 09' 12" West_ 429.20 feet to a point in the Northeasterly line of the aforementioned Phleger Parcel (1418 O.R. 428); thence along said Northeasterly line the following 5 courses: 1) North 51° 52' 22" Rest, 310.97 feet; 2) North 25° 1 V 27" West, 815.32 feet; 3) North 50° 53' 04" West, 1,493.94 feet; 4) North 360 39' 43" West, 753.47 feet; and 5) South 80' 55' 05" West, 576.67 feet to the Northerly terminus of this description hereinafter referred to as Point "H". EXHIBI Page of EXCEPTING THEREFROM those portions of Easements Parcel IV lying within that certain property described in that Final Order of Condemnation, dated 7-18-78, and recorded 7-18-78, Document No. 92691-AM, Book 7763, page 57 of Official Records, San Mateo County, California. PARCEL V: AN EASEMENT for ingress and egress purposes described as follows: A strip of land 60.00 feet in width, the centerline of which is described as follows: BEGINNING at the aforementioned Point "H" in the Northeasterly boundary line of the aforementioned Phleger Parcel (1418 O.R. 428); thence North 37' 27' 00" West, 449.58 feet; thence North 26° 38' 30" West, 349.42 feet; thence North 44' 39' 34" West, 520.01 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "I"; thence North 36° 13' 37" West, 503.88 feet; thence North 11° 00' 07" West, 301.14 feet; thence North 23° 37' 37" West, 202.25 feet; thence North 13° 50' 23" East, 85.82 feet; thence North 430 20' 53" East 449.89 feet; thence North 64' 02' 53" East 96.18 feet; thence North 85° 32' 53" East 258.65 feet; thence North 56" 04' 53' East, 165.44 feet; thence North 25° 36' 23" East, 267.05 feet; thence North 8" 33' 37" West, 168.24 feet; thence North 5° 45' 07" West, 340.86 feet; thence North 42" 44' 37" West, 345.51 feet; thence North 46° 16' 37" West, 227.28 feet; thence North 16° 04' 37" West, 92.56 feet; thence North 22° 54' 53" East, 137.92 feet; thence North 37' 34' 53" East, 298.92 feet; thence North 46° 44' 23" East, 344.89 feet to the intersection of Canada Road and Edgewood Road, and the Northerly terminus of this description. PARCEL VI: AN EASEMENT for ingress and egress purposes described as follows: A strip of land 60.00 feet in width, the centerline of which is described as follows: BEGINNING at the aforementioned Point "I"; thence South 13° 49' 07" East, 65.07 feet: thence South 34' 51' 53" West, 71.72 feet; thence South 79° 08' 53" West, 126.92 feet; thence South 49' 50' 53" West, 127.08 feet; thence South 88' 34' 53" West, 97.38 feet; thence North 67' 11' 37" West, 126.31 feet; thence North 36° 46' 07" West, 285.93 feet; thence North 73` 53' 37" West, 71.35 feet; thence South 56° 16' 53" West, 100.92 feet; thence South 73' 39' 53" West, 79.95 feet; thence North 42* 17' 37" West, 75.96 feet; thence North 21" 41' 07" West, 225.94 feet; thence North 60° 07' 37" West, 171.20 feet; thence North 52° 42' 07" West- 77.41 feet; thence North 43° 45' 07" West, 110.88 feet; thence North 65° 55' 37" West, 36.S*2 feet; thence South 83° 39' 53" West, 72/35 feet; thence North 65° 52' 37" West, 155.05 feet; thence North 45* 06' 07" West, 136.49 feet; thence North 44' 35' 37" West, 139.69 feet; thence 'Forth 63" 56' 37" West, 213.79 feet; thence South 82° 50' 23" West, 93.24 feet; thence Soe-r*.h 38° 21' 53" West, 60.14 feet; thence South 8° 49' 23" West, 51.64 feet; thence South 21° -- 53" West, 89.57 feet; thence South 15° 48, 53" West, 63.70 feet; thence South 66° 39' 23" West, 58.97 feet; thence South 85° 25' 53" West 143.81 feet; thence North 85° 01' 07" West, 124.98 feet; thence South 86° 47' 23" West, 57.52 feet; thence South 66' 08' 53" West, 59.29 feet; f.XHIBIT Paso f thence South 38° 57' 53" West, 154.49 feet; thence South 340 59' 53" West, 68.65 feet; thence South 45° 13' 53" West, 73.40 feet; thence South 61° 16' 23" West, 63.30 feet; thence South 73° 59' 23" West, 166.04 feet; thence South 43° 20' 53" West, 46.70 to a point in the Northerly boundary line of the aforementioned Phleger F:.�cel (?418.O.R. 428), distant thereon South 800 18' 52" West, 80.47 feet from the Northwest corner of Parcel One as shown on the aforementioned Parcel Map (25 P.M. 45). A.P. No.: 067-280-010 7PN 067 028 280 01 A 067-280-050 067 028 280 02 A 067-280-080 067 028 280 03 A 067-280-100 067 028 280 04 A 067-280-110 067 028 280 05 A 067-280-060 067 028 280 06 A EXHIBIT Of OF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FORMER PHLEGER PROPERTY This agreement is made on the day of , 1993 b and between g Y Y Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, a public agency, hereinafter called "DISTRICT" and Save-the-Redwoods League, a public benefit corporation, hereinafter called "SRL". WHEREAS, on or about August 5, 1991, SRL acquired a portion of the so called "Phleger Property" (San Mateo County Assessors parcel numbers 067-280-100 and 067-280-110), as further described in Exhibit "A" as attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, hereinafter called the "Subject Property" or "Property," and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is near DISTRICT land and DISTRICT desires to participate in the acquisition of the Property for public park purposes in the future. Until that time POST desires that DISTRICT immediately manage the Property until such time as a public agency acquires the Property, and WHEREAS, this Agreement details the management responsibility of DISTRICT during the period prior to acquisition of the Subject Property by a public agency, and NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed, as follows: 1. Management. DISTRICT shall be responsible for management of the entire approximately 1,224 acre Subject Property for that period of time from the date of final execution of this Agreement until a public agency acquires fee title ownership of the Subject Property from SRL. 2. Patrol. DISTRICT will routinely patrol and manage the Property in a manner consistent with nearby DISTRICT holdings to ensure that the Property is kept in a safe and sanitary condition, that the land is free from public trespass, and that off- road vehicles or other deleterious uses of the Property are prohibited. Should any trespass or other unauthorized use of the Property occur, DISTRICT will be responsible for correcting these matters including, where necessary, enforcing DISTRICT ordinances on the Subject Property. The property shall be deemed to be property under the control of District for purposes of Public Resource Code Section 5558. 3. Uses. DISTRICT and SRL shall specify uses permitted on the property in other documents as necessary. 4. Legal, Responsibility and Indemnification. DISTRICT shall have full legal responsibility for management and operation of the Subject Property and the condition thereof and for all activities conducted thereon, and in this respect DISTRICT shall Property Management Agreement Page 2 Phleger Property hold SRL harmless from and defend SRL against any and all claim or liability for injury or damage to any persons or property whatsoever occurring in, on or about the Subject Property arising out of any condition of the Subject Property or of any act, neglect, fault or omission of DISTRICT, its agents, employees, or invitees. 5. Termination. Either party, upon 30 days written notice, may for any cause withdraw from the terms and obligations of this agreement. MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SAVE-THE-REDWOODS LEAGUE: SPACE DISTRICT: by b President, Board of Directors John DeWitt, Executive Director Attest: District Clerk PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FORMER PHLEGER PROPERTY LIST OF PERMITTED USES xi r n 1. The Woodside Trails Club may continue to use and maintain the existing g trails it s o the e i property for equestrian use. 2. Peninsula Open Space Trust and Save-the-Redwoods League may use the property for any purpose. 3. The National Park Service may use the property for ranger led tours. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or raFarrad to covarad by this Report ia : A FEE The land referred to in this Report is situated in the State of Cmlifnrnim , rniinty of 5.r#n tintmo anti 1N HmnrrihPd nn fm1lowl ! Being a portion of that certain parcel of land described in the Dead to Mary Clana Phlagor recordod October 213 , 1947 , in 800K 1418 at page 428 , Official Records of San Mateo County , further described as follows : BEGINNING at a point in the Northeasterly right-of-way line of Skyline Boulevard , also being State Highway 55 as shown on Right- of-Way Racord Map R­519 .6 , said point being at Station 3071-24 .72 ; thence leaving said right-of-way line North 33 ' 00 ' 00" East , 6 , 609 . 21 feet ; thence South 67 ' 00 ' 00" East , 1 ,500 .00 feet to tho Southorly boundary lino of =aid Phlogar Parcol ( 1418 O.R. 419 ) '' thence 4lbh'4 Parcel , also being the Northerly boundary' of that parcel known as Huddart Park as described in the Deed to San Mateo County , Recorded May 3 , 1946 , in Book 1282 at page 72 , official Records of San Mateo County the following 52 courses : 1 ) South 24 ' 03 ' 311, West , 105 .60 feet ; 2 ) South 21 ' 18 ' 31 " West , 151 - 60 feet ; 3 ) South 47 ' 18 ' 31 " West , 118 .80 feet ; 4 ) South 24' 18 ' 31 " West , 161 . 80 feet ; 6 ) South 15 ' 18 ' 31 " West , 145 . 20 feet 6) South 37 ' 40 ' 311, West , 2G7 .40 feet ; 7 ) South 19 ' 4B ' 3111 We:3t , 99 .40 feet ; 8) South 5 ' 18 ' 31 " West , 92 . 40 Feet ; 9 ) South 35 ' 48 ' 3111 West , 116 . 82 feet ; 10) South E5 * 48 ' 31 " West , 184 .80 feet ; 11 ) South 39 ' 03 ' 31 " Wast , 110 .00 Feet , 12 ) youth 22 ' 40 ' 31 " West , 138 . 00 Feet ; 13 ) South 5 ' 26 ' 29" East , 132 .00 feet ; 14) South 6 ' 33 ' 311, Wasty 171 . 60 feet ; 15 ) South 23 ' 16 ' 3111 West , 79 . 20 Feet; 16 ) South 93 ' 48 ' 31 " West , 10S .60 feet ; 17) South 45 ' 48 ' 31 " West , 85 . 14 fact ; 18 ) South 28' 33 ' 31 " West , 79 . 20 Feet ; 19 ) South 34* 33 ' 31 " West , 303 .60 feet ; 20 ) South IS ' 18 ' 31 " West , 138 . 60 feet ; 21) South 11 ' 11 ' 29" East , 85 .80 feet ; 22 ) South 37 ' 41 ' 29" East , 92 .40 feet ; 23 ) South 23 ' S6 ' 2911 East , 72 ,60 Foot ; 24 ) South 2 ' 56 ' 29" East , 72 . 60 feet ; 25 ) South 25 ' 118 ' 31 " West , 72 .60 feet ; 26) South 38' 03 ' 31 " Wo3t , 263 .80 feet ; 27) South 35 ' 33 ' 31 " West , 165 . 00 feet : 28) South 22' 18 ' 31" West , 66 .00 foet ; 29 ) South 45' 16 ' 3111 West , 99 -00 feet ; 30 ) SWULI-1 52 ' 03 ' 31 " Wt--%iL ? 231 . 00 reeot ; 31 ) SouLh 31 ' 40 ' 31 " West , 132 .00 feet ; 32 ) South 9 ' 48 ' 31 " West , 158 .40 feet ; 33 ) South 25 ' 18 ' 31 " West , 92 . 40 Feet ; 34 ) South 19 ' 48 ' 31 " West , 147 . 18 feet ; 35 ) North 81 ' 58 ' 29" WLbL , 184 . 80 suet ; 36) South 58 ' 03 ' 3111 West , 132 .00 Feet ; 37) North 72 ' 06 ' 29" West , 145 .20 feet ; 38 ) North 62 ' 56 ' 29 " West , 118 . 80 feet ; 39) South 70 ' 33 ' 31 " West , 118 .80 rr.-LA ; 40) South 48 ' 03 ' 31 " West , 14,54 . R0 Feat; 41 ) South 61 ' 03 ' 3111 West , 105 . 60 feet , 42 ) South SS' 03 ' 31 " West , 92 . 40 feet ; 43) South 88 ' 33 ' 211, West , 191 .40 feet ; 44) South 78 ' 03 ' 31 " Wv:aL , 66 .00 feet ; 45 ) North 00 ' 20 ' 291, West . 66 .00 Feet ; 46) 69 ' 41 ' 2911 West , 1132 . 00 fact ; 47) North 84 ' 56' 29" West , 66 .00 feet ; 48) South 8S " 18 ' 31 " West , 79 - 20 feet ; 49) EEC WRIT Page South 58 , 58 ' 31 " West , 244 . 20 feet ; 60 ) 5outh 31 ' 48 ' 31 " West , 79 . 20 feat ; 51 ) South 86 ' 18 ' 31 " West , 132 .00 feet ; 52 ) South 88 ' 42 ' 3111 West , 66 . 13 feet to a point on the aforementioned Northeasterly Right-of-Way Line of Skyline Boulevard ; thence along said right-of way line , North 39 "* 23 ' 30" West , 169 - 21 feet ; thence continuing along said right-of-way line, Northwesterly along the arc of a tangent , 1 ,0G0 . 11 foot radius curve to the left , through a central angle of 18 ' 16 , 251, , an arc distance of 334 .92 feet to the point of beginning . Said parcel is also known as Parcel I as shown an that certain map entitled "RECORD OF SURVEY OF A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF THE LANDS OF PHLEGER ( 1418 O.R . 428) AND THE LANDS OF KING$ MOUNTAIN VOLUNTEER FIRE BRIGADE , INC . (6746 O-R . 258) " , r -ijad in the office of the County Recorder OF San Mateo County , State Of California on August 5 , 1991 in Book 13 of Record of Survey Maps at, pages -108 thrw. .112 -Ancl-uxi-vu. A.P . No. : 067-280-100 JPN 067 028 260 02 A067 028 280 03 A 067--280-110 NEw AP# 067-280-180 Page Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT R-93-61 Meeting 93-09 May 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM Amendment to the Use and Management Plan for Long Ridge Open ac Preserve ACTING GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Amend the Use and Management Plan to include the recomme ations listed below. DISCUSSION At your December 7, 1983 meeting, you authorized purchase of a 182-acre property whereby the District would retain an easement over the property and Sempervirens Fund would hold fee title. The parcel is located in Santa Cruz County. At your meeting of April 24, 1991 (see report R-91-52, dated April 18, 1991) you exercised the District option to purchase fee title to the property from Sempervirens Fund. In April, 1992 the property was annexed into the District. Escrow for transfer of fee title to the District closed on April 6, 1993. Sempervirens Fund has used the hickory oak ridge area as a gathering spot for various fund raising events. They would like to continue to use the hickory oak ridge area for such events. The use and management plan for Long Ridge Open Space Preserve should be amended to reflect this use. In addition, the 182-acre easement was dedicated as public open space at your January 22, 1986 meeting. The fee title interests should now be considered for dedication. USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 Special Activities 1.1 Sempervirens Fund shall be allowed to use the hickory oak ridge area for special events, given they first apply for a District use permit and comply with District regulations governing such activities. Open Space . . . for room to breathe 20th Anniversary 1972-4992 330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone:415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485 19 General Manager:Herbert Grench Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit R-93-61 Page 2 2.0 Dedication Status 2.1 The fee title interest in the 182-acre property should be considered for dedication as public open space during the review of the next Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for the Long Ridge Open Space Preserve. Prepared by: Mary Gundert, Open Space Planner Contact person: Same as above Open Space s MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT I R-93-54 Meeting 93-10 May 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM f 1992-1993 Program Evaluation ACTING GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATI Accept staff's program evaluation report. 4 Discussion: The attached program evaluation material covers the 1992-1993 fiscal year. In November 1991, you agreed to continue the 1991-1992 action plan through the 1992-1993 fiscal year, with additional projects or project changes being reflected in the 1992-1993 budget. As with all public agencies throughout the state, the District's Board and staff spent a significant amount of time during the 1992-1993 fiscal year addressing the state's budget crisis and its potential impact on the District's funding. Shortly after the adoption of the 1992-1993 state budget in September 1992, the Board and staff began preparing for future revenue cuts due to the on-going imbalance of the state's budget. The Board and staff elected to place a hold on all hiring, capital improvement projects, and acquisitions pending a budget review. In preparation for threatened revenue reductions, the Budget Committee and management team, with input from staff, participated in a ten-week process of reviewing remaining 1992-1993 operating expenses. The result was an overall 18 percent reduction in operating expenses -- reducing the operating budget to $4.5 million. You adopted the new action plan for the 1993-1994 fiscal year at your March 24, 1993 meeting. Prepared by: J. Fiddes, Administrative Services Manager; L. Craig Britton, Acting General Manager/Land Acquisition Manager; R. Anderson, Planning Manager; J. Escobar, Operations Manager; M. Smith, Public Affairs Manager Contact person: J. Fiddes Report R-93- 4 Page 2 OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION PROGRAM Subprograms A. Negotiations and Special Projects B. Enterprise To Implement the BASIC POLICY OBJECTIVE: The District will purchase or otherwise acquire interest in the maximum feasible amount of strategic open space within the District planning areas. General Program Emphasis for 1992-1993 As a result of dwindling funds for open space land acquisition, the program's emphasis will be to work closely with the controller to scrutinize carefully each potential acquisition to focus efforts on the highest priority projects while minimizing expenditures on non-grant funded, lower priority acquisitions. PROGRESS: • Three months into the 1992-1993 fiscal year, all new land acquisition projects were frozen. Only high priority projects were to be considered by the Board and then only on a case-by-case basis. As a result, only three of the ten transactions closing during fiscal year 1992-1993 occurred after Jul 1, 1992. The most significant one was the completion of the Vidovich transaction. These Y g P transactions totaled 848.29 acres at a total cost of $10,466,667, of which $8,500,000 was for Vidovich. Report R-93-54 Page 3 1992-1993 Negotiations and Special Projects Subprogram Objective The objective of the Negotiations and Special projects Subprogram is to provide for the acquisition of all real property rights necessary to secure a recreational greenbelt in the foothills and baylands, including rounding out and improving public access to existing preserves and connecting District preserves with other public lands. Key Projects and Activities 1. Convert the budgeted funds in the New Land Commitments budget category into open space lands focusing on the highest priority properties, including rounding out and improving public access to existing preserves and connecting trails at desirable prices, balancing the desirability of the potential acquisition with the availability of limited funds, including, where possible, private financing with favorable terms. PROGRESS: • Rounding Out: 459 acres for $ 1,686,667 ($ 3,675/acre) • Public Access: 0 acres • Trail Connections: 390 acres for 8,780,000 (22,513/acre) • Total 849 acres for $110,466,667 ($12,328/acre) • Owner Financed: $ 0 • Gifts and Grants $ 1,780,000 2. Concentrate acquisition efforts on those parcels that will assist with completion of the Ridge Trail system within the District's sphere of influence. PROGRESS: • The former Davis property was acquired as an addition to Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. • The Norton purchase contract was approved for Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve. 3. Work with Peninsula Open Space Trust to complete at least one acquisition project that significantly furthers the District's overall open space goals. PROGRESS: • Continued to work with POST on the acquisition of the Phleger property. • POST participated in the Glaubiger exchange at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve. • POST acquired the former Liles property in the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. 4. Seek and encourage agencies and groups to undertake sole or joint acquisition projects which will preserve additional open space such as a joint project with the Town of Los Gatos. PROGRESS: _ • Sempervirens Fund agreed to extend option - Long Ridge Open Space Preserve. • Azzarello cooperative acquisition with Santa Clara County - El Sereno Open Space Preserve was completed. • Obtained option to acquire the Johnson and General Convention properties in Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve for possible purchase if funding received from a successful Planning and Conservation League measure on the 1994 ballot. i Report R-93-54 Page 4 1992-1993 Enterprise Subprogram Objective The objective of the Enterprise Subprogram is to manage all the District's revenue producing activities in such a way as to maximize income from enterprise accounts consistent with Open Space Management policies and to explore new compatible activities. Key Projects and Activities 1. Administer all leases and rental accounts, updating rental rates and other lease conditions as opportunities arise, to maximize income consistent with Open Space Management policies. PROGRESS: • Rental rates increased an average of 4% to reflect cost of living changes and market conditions. The total revenue increase over prior year from residential program was approximately $35,000, including new rental accounts. • Completed renovation of new offices at 330 Distel Circle without losing tenants. Rental income currently covers District operating and maintenance costs to occupy building. 2. Carry out maintenance and improvements to rental properties to keep buildings and grounds in a safe, sanitary, and attractive condition, and to increase net rental income. PROGRESS: • Expenses reduced by $50,000 from prior year, with total vacancy rate of two unit months. • Negotiated agreement with communications tenants to share the cost of access road maintenance. The tenants will pay $10,000. 3. Prepare cost-benefit studies on a case by case basis as major repair, improvement and/or rental decisions arise. PROGRESS: • Priced Smith, Bean, and Landre properties for long-term occupancy, and initiated active program to market them. No sale to date. Report R-93-54 Page 5 PLANNING PROGRAM To Implement the BASIC POLICY OBJECTIVE: The District will follow a land management policy that provides proper care of open space land, allowing public access appropriate to the nature of the land and consistent with ecological values. General Program Emphasis for 1992-1993 The emphasis of the Planning Program for 1992-1993 was implementation of the resource management policies and the trail use standards. Continuing implementation of grant-funded development projects was also a high priority. PROGRESS: • The Planning Program has focused on refining draft resource management policies, and formulating and implementing resource management projects for various open space preserves, particularly where opportunities exist for grants or other outside funding. • Staff has drafted trail use guidelines and is currently applying them to various preserves. • To date, no comprehensive resource plan has been submitted for Board review. • The final stage of grant-funded projects at the Picchetti Ranch Area, Russian Ridge, and Pulgas Ridge are being initiated. • Applications for Caltrans-administed grants have been prepared and submitted for staging area acquisition and development for the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. • Major activities completed not incorporated in the original program emphasis are preparation of a plan for access for persons with disabilities, in compliance with the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act and revision of the adopted budget to reduce costs in response to the threat of significant cuts in revenue due to the state budget crisis. Also, research and negotiation was conducted to address issues in the administration of the District's historic leases. Report R-93-54 Page 6 1992-1993 Planning Program b jectiv The objective of the Planning Program is to provide short-term and long-range acquisition planning and formulation and review of Use and Management Plans, as well as overseeing the physical implementation of capital improvements for public access and interpretation, and for resource management, master, and other special plans. Key Projects and Activities 1. Continue implementation of Board-approved and grant-funded public access improvements including trails, water system, toilets, and the interpretation center at Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. Continue implementation of grant-funded historic structure improvements at Picchetti Ranch area and other structure improvements at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve. Complete the planning and commence implementation of parking areas and trails at Windy Hill Open Space Preserve. PROGRESS: • Completed grant-funded trail construction projects at Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve. • Held staff-level meetings and initiated consultant contract for planning process to design and implement interior improvements and exhibits for David Daniels interpretive nature center at Alpine Pond, Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. • Completed review by Town of Portola Valley of conditional use permit for Windy Hill Open Space Preserve. • Prepared Land and Water Conservation Fund grant application for public access projects at Windy Hill. • Prepared Land and Water Conservation Fund grant application for Saratoga Open Space Preserve Gateway acquisition and development project • Prepared Mitigation Enhancement and ISTEA grant applications for Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve Staging Area acquisition and development project • Substantially completed reconstruction of spillway at Sausal Pond dam, Windy Hill Open Space Preserve. • Completed well drilling, planning process, and substantial portion of permit process for new water system for Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. • Completed Santa Clara County Use Permit and Design Review process for field office, Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve. Initiated building permit process. • Barn restoration at Picchetti Ranch area of Monte Bello Open Space Preserve is complete and the blacksmith shop restoration is now out to bid. • Land and Water Conservation Fund Ridge Trail Horseshoe Bridge project completed at Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. 2. Continue multi jurisdictional planning projects for the Bay and Ridge Trails. Conduct joint planning with Santa Clara County on Rancho San Antonio County Park, the Lexington Reservoir Plan, including the Highway 17 overcrossing and connections to El Sereno Open Space Preserve and on the connection between Monte Bello and Fremont Older Open Space Preserves. PROGRESS: • Bay Trail activities include co-hosting the South Bay Trail Forum, coordinating the California Recreational Trails Committee tour of the project area and obtaining a resolution of support from, and conducting continuing negotiations with NASA and Lockheed for south bay trail easements. Report R-93-54 Page 7 • The District and the City of Mountain View co-hosted dedication of the restored Grant House at Deer Hollow Farm in Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve. • Ridge Trail activities include participating in regional trails planning and a slide show presentation, and hosting a Ridge Trail dedication event at Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. • Joint planning efforts with Santa Clara County include staff participation on the Lower Stevens Creek County Park master plan task force and the Upper Stevens Creek County Park Resource Management Plan Task Force. Efforts continued to promote joint acquisition of property in the Jacques Ridge area, and to coordinate comments on subdivision plans. Participated in design review of improvement projects at Rancho San Antonio County Park. • Coordinated with Santa Clara County Transportation Agency and CalTrans to formulate oak woodland restoration project on Saint Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve, as mitigation for impacts of Highway 17 interchange project at Lexington Reservoir. 3. Apply adopted District-wide trail policies and guidelines to key trails and begin applying them to site-specific Use and Management Plans. Implement adopted resource management policies by incorporating priority of projects into the site emphasis and Use and Management Plan review process. PROGRESS: • Trail use guidelines adopted and now being applied to Coal Creek and Saint Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserves, including refinement of inventory techniques. Also coordinating application and refinement of access measures and information for persons with disabilities to implement adopted District plan for compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act. • Continued to research and refine draft resource management policies in preparation for board and public review (anticipated to take place during summer, 1993). Researched detailed policies and implemented basic policies through specific resource analysis and management projects, in coordination with Operations Program: 1 Removal of frost-damaged eucalyptus trees at Rancho San Antonio ace Open S g Yr � 1' Preserve and restoration of affected area. 2) Invasive vegetation and fire management project at Pulgas Ridge Open Space Preserve, under contract with California Department of Forestry. 3). Coordinated San Francisco State University student projects for biological analyses of Pulgas Ridge and El Corte de Madera Open Space Preserves. Report R-93-54 Page 8 OPERATIONS PROGRAM To Implement the BASIC POLICY OBJECTIVE: The District will follow a land management policy that provides proper care of open space land, allowing public access appropriate to the nature of the land and consistent with ecological values. General Program Emphasis for 1992-1993 The emphasis of the Operations Program is to provide for responsible stewardship and safe use of District lands, as well as to enhance visitor appreciation and participation. PROGRESS: • The Operations Program continues to provide for the on-site operational needs of District lands. Maintenance and construction crews realigned several trails to accommodate multiple use and improve trail safety. • At Monte Bello Open Space Preserve, crews constructed a trail bridge, improving the all- weather link to Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. • Improvements to existing structures include the renovation of apartments at El Corte de Madera and Sierra Azul for use as ranger residences. • Patrol staff continues to attempt to mitigate trail-use conflicts through visitor education and active enforcement of District use regulations. • The docent program began offering docent training twice a year to provide for increased interest in the program. • A core of dedicated volunteers continues to perform a variety of field work projects. The use of volunteers for administrative tasks increased in all programs in the past year. Report R-93-54 Page 9 1992-1993 QMrations Program Objective Provide responsible stewardship of all District lands by furnishing those public safety, maintenance, and resource protection services necessary and appropriate for effective management of District lands. Key Projects and Activities 1. Draft a new staffing plan for Board consideration based on the Strategic Plan for the Nineties that includes field staff development to cover open space stewardship needs and that open space management personnel support needs. PROGRESS: • The reorganization of the operations program is complete insofar as current budgetary constraints permit. Two lead open space technician positions were approved and implemented as a conversion of two existing open space technician positions. The full-time docent coordinator position, delayed because of budgetary concerns, was filled in February. • The development of a ten-year operations staffing plan is pending, awaiting clarification of the District's financial future. 2. Implement adopted ranger field operations manual. PROGRESS: • The field operations manual has been implemented. Sections on evidence and search procedures subsequently added. • Additions and revisions to the manual will continue periodically as the staff formalizes other field procedures. 3. Begin implementing adopted resource management policies and plans for specific high priority projects District-wide. PROGRESS: • In the absence of adopted resource management policies, a variety of small resource management related projects primarily focusing on erosion control, revegetation, and exotic species eradication were conducted with planning program support. 4. Begin implementing adopted trail policies and guidelines. PROGRESS: • Since the Board adoption of trail use guidelines, operations staff has been assisting the planning program with the trail inventory process. • The development of a volunteer trail patrol program is underway. Recruiting is planned for summer, with a training program in the fall. Ranger bicycle patrol is also being studied. • Rules and regulations revision recommendations are being finalized for Board review at their the May 26 meeting. 5. Develop plans for a new radio system to meet the District's primary communications needs. PROGRESS: • The District began use of the new system on May 1, 1993 with the City of Mountain View providing all dispatch services. Report R-93-54 Page 10 PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROGRAM Subprograms A. Public Affairs and Education B. Organizational Relations C. Media Relations To Implement the BASIC POLICY OBJECTIVE: The District will educate and make clearly visible to the public the purposes and actions of the District, and will actively encourage public communication and involvement in District activities. General Program Emphasis for 1992-1993 Develop a comprehensive public relations plan to increase visibility for the District by promoting the Twentieth Anniversary and the District's achievements since 1972. PROGRESS: • The public relations plan was completed and approved by the Board in January, 1993. Implementation of several elements, including press relations, slide show production, speakers bureau and other outreach efforts, had already begun and full implementation is now underway. It should be noted that in the approved 1993-1994 Action Plan, the program's subprograms have been modified to more accurately reflect issues currently facing the District. For purposes of consistency, this 1992-1993 program evaluation section is based on the former subprograms. Future evaluations will follow the revised subprograms. The revised subprograms are: A. General Public Information and Outreach B. Legislative and Organizational Relations C. Funding Measure Preparation Report R-93-54 Page 11 1992-1993 Public Affairs and Education Subprogram Objective The objective of the Public Affairs and Education Subprogram is to generate greater public awareness, involvement, and support of the District through a continuing campaign to inform and educate the constituency about the District's sites, programs, and goals. Key Projects and Activities 1. Prepare a comprehensive public relations plan to promote the District's Twentieth Anniversary. PROGRESS: • Dedication event held in June at Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. • Founder's Day Dinner held on November 7, attended by nearly 300 invited guests. • Six very favorable articles generated in local newspapers. • Three public service announcements prepared for airing on local television stations, with one being delivered and aired so far. • One local cable television news magazine produced a District 20th Anniversary profile that aired six times. • Three District newsletters included articles on the 20th Anniversary. 2. Continue to implement new comprehensive graphic identity and printed image program for the District. PROGRESS: • New District logo is now fully in place and has become recognized as the District identity. • District letterhead paper stock has been changed to a more obvious recycled stock in keeping with the environmental and conservationist character of the District. • Newsletters are now being printed with non-glossy paper to better reflect the District's natural and austere identity. • A new District slide show and presentation script have been produced with a consistent message and identity. • District photo-display has been produced with the same, consistent theme and identity as the slide show and presentation script. • Procedure has been implemented requiring all "outside" presentations, displays or slide shows be cleared through the public affairs manager in order to ensure that all outreach is consistent. 3. Publish two issues of the newsletter and two issues of Open Space. PROGRESS: • Produced two newsletters (summer, 1992 and spring, 1993). • One issue of Open Space produced as an annual report. • Annual production schedule developed, which consists of three newsletters and one annual report. This is also in keeping with a movement towards a more prudent use of funds. 4. Hold public dedication event at Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve in Spring, 1992. PROGRESS: • The June 1992 event received moderate publicity and attended by approximately 75 people. Report R-93-54 Page 12 5. Revise Visitor's Guide. PROGRESS: • The Visitor's Guide has not been revised, due to staffing changes and the large quantity of the "old" guides still available for distribution. Proposals for an entirely new Visitor's Guide (as opposed to a revision) will be forthcoming. Report R-93-54 Page 13 1992-1993 Organizational Relations Subprogram Objective The objective of the Organizational Relations Subprogram is to inform other public agencies and private organizations about the District and to secure legislation to protect the Districts funding and otherwise aid g g P g in the accomplishment of the District's goals. Key Projects and Activities 1. Accomplish or make significant progress on priority items in District's legislative program. PROGRESS: • Successfully exempted District from state budget cuts through close work with District's lobbyist and calls and letters to appropriate legislators. • Successful in helping to defeat harmful legislation and to have other bills amended to meet District needs. • As noted in general manager's Final Status Report on th Legislative Program, the state budget crisis dominated the District's legislative program and therefore less was achieved on other aspects of the adopted legislative program. • Informational meetings with members of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors took place in March, 1993. • The District has taken steps towards the possibility of a funding measure on the June, 1994 ballot. • A public opinion poll and a visitor survey have been undertaken. • Basic research into funding options has been done. • Initial compilation of voter statistics has been accomplished and some primary research into land use and parcel counts completed. • Contact made with public affairs managers or public information officers at other park, open space or land conservation organizations. 2. Produce the 1991-1992 Annual Report as part of one issue of Open Space. PROGRESS: • The 1991-1992 Annual Report was printed, and distributed with a letter from the President of the Board of Directors. The production schedule will now consist of only one issue of Open Space, as an annual report. The next issue will be printed in late 1993. 3. Hold joint meetings with the Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties Parks and Recreation Commissions. PROGRESS: • These meetings did not take place. However, liaison with these and other boards and commissions is part of the overall public affairs plan that is being implemented. • An additional key project is the District's involvement in the Bay Area Open Space Council, a consortium of open space authorities working to coordinate the broad issues affecting its members. The general manager and public affairs manager are representing the District on this consortium. In addition, the District is involved in an advisory capacity with the formation of the new Santa Clara County Open Space Authority and providing assistance as needed. Report R-93-54 Page 14 1992-1993 Media Relations Subprogram b'ective The objective of the Media Relations Subprogram is to inform the public as fully as possible about the District's purposes and activities through news stories, features, and public service announcements in the press, and on radio and television. Key Projects and Activities 1. Write and produce press releases covering Board meetings, special meetings, District policies, docent walks and volunteer activities for the public in accordance with the District's policy statement regarding open information and cooperation. PROGRESS: • A "metered" press release program implemented as part of the public affairs plan. Since implementation, over twenty press releases and countless follow up calls have been provided to the media. • Comprehensive lists of media contacts compiled. • Personal contact with the press has increased. • District is regularly mentioned in the Government Calendar listings of many papers and has received three mentions in the Mercury News' Leigh Weimers column, one of the most widely read columns within the District boundaries. • District successfully worked to gain positive publicity for the "mortgage burning" celebrating the completion of the Pulgas Ridge assessment district payments. • As a result of these activities, overall media coverage of the District has increased. 2. Publicize availability of District sites at a level consistent with the Board's policy for Relative Emphasis of District Sites. PROGRESS: • Completed as ongoing work. The public relations plan outlines various strategies and methods for generating a higher level of public awareness of the District. • The District's speaker's bureau has reached nearly 500 people. • The District display is regularly scheduled at corporate and civic events. • Public affairs is working with the planning and operations programs to increase use of the Daniels Nature Center. • Public information meetings are being held as needed, such as those for the Vidovich acquisition, Rancho San Antonio eucalyptus removal, Olive Tree Lane access, etc. • The public affairs plan also calls for "town meetings" that will provide a forum for the public to provide direct input to the District's Board and management. These meetings may be postponed until a new general manager is hired and could then be publicized as "meet the general manager" meetings. • Overall, an increasingly high level of outreach has been accomplished and District collateral materials are being distributed at a much higher rate than was previously the case. 3. Publicize the District's Twentieth Anniversary. PROGRESS: • The Twentieth Anniversary committee continues to meet and is making plans for a final event to complete celebration of the 20th Anniversary. Report R-93-54 Page 15 • Banners thanking our visitors for 20 years of support were produced and are now being placed at selected preserves. • As noted above, a significant amount of press coverage was generated for the 20th Anniversary through the Founder's Day Dinner and through personal contact with the media. 4. Publicizes special Board meeting workshops to be held in an appropriate planning area well in P� g P advance of meeting. PROGRESS: • Publicity for the August 19 Corte de Madera workshop began on July 29, allowing 21 days advance notice for attendance. Publicity included notifying appropriate newspapers and directly notifying affected neighbors. Report R-93-54 Page 16 GENERAL MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM SUPPORT To Implement the BASIC POLICY OBJECTIVE: The staff of the District will administer the affairs of the District on behalf of the public so as to maximize accomplishment of the goals of the District within existing financial and other constraints. General Program Emphasis for 1992-1993 Implement organizational restructuring and related infrastructure needs as approved for 1992- 1993 for the Strategic Plan for the Nineties. PROGRESS: • The staffing reorganization plan was adopted in March, 1992, but due to the state budget crisis g the following six positions have not been filled: *Acquisition Administrative Assistant •Planning Second Planning Technician Secretary (one-half time) *Operations Second Equipment Mechanic-Operator *General Management Administrative Clerk (one-half time) & Program Support Receptionist (one-half time) In addition, the filling of an additional ranger position is "on hold," as is the filing of the real property representative position on a regular, full-time basis. • The Ralph Andersen & Associates classification, salary, and benefits study was completed and implemented in fall 1992. • Due to the bankruptcy of the contractor for the 330 Distel renovation, the move to the new main office headquarters was delayed until end of August, 1992. 0 After several rounds of drafts of the Strategic Plan for the Nineties, the final draft of the plan was presented to the Board in July, 1992. Due to funding uncertainties created by the state budget crisis, discussion of the proposed plan was put on hold. The Board subsequently approved the plan in January 1993, with the addition of an overall policy objective to protect and defend the District's existing property tax revenue from reduction by the state. Report R-93-54 Page 17 1992-1993 General Management and Program Support Objectives The objective of the General Management and Program Support is to provide overall coordination, direction, and administrative base for all District activities so as to maximize the accomplishment of the Board's policies and directives. Key Projects and Activities 1. Implement organizational structure changes for 1992-1993 as approved for the Strategic Plan for the Nineties and carry out District's personnel-related functions. PROGRESS: • See general program emphasis progress statement. • The public affairs manager and planning manager positions were filled in June, 1992, with incumbents immediately becoming active members of the management team. • Contract negotiations slated for the first months of 1993 were deferred until current year's budget crisis in Sacramento is resolved. 2. Enhance staff effectiveness through increased communications; staff meetings, retreats, and workshops; training seminars; and team building activities. PROGRESS: • Employee steering committee for District's non-represented employees active during past year, as were safety committee and uniform committee. • Management team focused on organizational improvement program and team building activities. 0 All staff kept apprised of state budget crisis and potential impact on District during summer- fall 1992 and were involved in mid-year budget cuts when 1992-1993 budget reduced overall by 18 percent. 3. Pursue alternative sources to secure additional funding for the District to meet acquisition and open space management needs. PROGRESS: • Proceedings initiated to form a benefit assessment district to help fund the Vidovich acquisition and subsequently terminated after a 55% protest recorded. • Staff preparing foundation for a long-term funding measure in 1994. • Acquisition funding ($36 million)currently included$1.9 billion CaIPAW initiative proposed for June 1994 ballot. 4. Based on availability of 1990 census data, analyze District's population distribution to determine if ward boundary adjustments are necessary. PROGRESS: • Completed. • Based on new ward boundaries, coordinated necessary election services and activities for Wards 3, 4, and 7. 5. Develop a process by which staff and Board members coordinate short and long-term goals and objectives for acquisition. PROGRESS: 0 Completed. Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT I TO: Board of Directors FROM: C. Britton, Acting General Manager DATE: May 7, 1993 SUBJECT: F. Y. I. Open Space . . . for room to breathe 20th Anniversary • 1972-1992 330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone:415-691-1200 • FAX:415-691-0485 General Manager:Herbert Grench Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wire de Wit I,.- State Budget Crisis Impact On The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District • The District depends almost entirely on property tax revenues, unlike many other special districts that have additional sources such as fees or charges. Therefore, an equal percentage reduction in tax revenues would take a much higher proportion of our total funding, as compared to these other districts. • The possible revenue reduction could amount to over one-third of the District's projected property tax revenues of$10 million in fiscal year 1993-94, and would have a devastating effect on this voter-mandated program. • Any such reduction would cause the District to curtail all new acquisitions of open space, to consider the possibility of extensive staff reductions and to look at significantly reduced maintenance and/or closure of open space preserves. • The District has already put all major acquisitions on hold; any reductions in the annual budget will prohibit further acquisition and preservation of open space by the District. • As a non-enterprise entity, the District has no other regular source of revenue and since the District imposes no user fees or charges, there are no means of directly replacing lost property tax revenue. • A number of critical projects for the public benefit have already been postponed or canceled due to the threat of this reduction in revenue. • The District is a regional entity, encompassing significant portions of Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties, as well as a portion of Santa Cruz County. • Our surveys show that a portion of our visitors come from outside the District boundaries, making this a special district of truly regional significance. • The District manages state-owned lands, including portions of Burleigh-Murray State Park, tidelands and certain Caltrans rights-of-way. $10 million annual property tax revenue for MROSD(FY1993-94) Up to 35%of annual funding could be lost $6.5 million $3.5 million i Open Space • 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ! June 1, 1993 (State Legis ator) (address) (City, State, Zi Dear The Midpeni la Regional Open Space District, now in its 20th year, is a "-county special district which has acquired ove 5,000 acres of open space in 23 preserves, with publ' access 365 days a year. The state is seriously consideri a property tax shift from local agencies which w d negatively impact the District. Current proposals inc de transfer of art, all or more than 'bailout" funds provided to local agencies P P g via AB 8. Property taxes are th only significant, ongoing sourc f revenue for this district, and it is important to reiterate to you the devastatin effect that such a decrease ' revenues would induce. Loss of only the "bailout" nds would cause a District to freeze all new acquisitions of open space, to implement staff reductions, and t look at sign eantly reduced in and/or closure of open space P preserves, which would reduce ubli access seriously compromise fire and emergency response in the P Y P g Y P mid eninsula/Santa Cruz Mountains are Fu er, we would lose our ability t borrow P ty o bo o money or issue bonds, which has historically been the source fo ch of our acquisition funding. Unfortunately, the District h no vi ble means of replacing this loss of revenue. Out of the District's projected property tax income of$1 million ( scal year 1993-94), about$5.9 million is already pledged to debt service for previous land acquisiti , as author' by State law. Our current "bare-bones" budget for operations is $4.5 million, which leaves s no room for a ditional budget reductions. Loss of the "bailout" funds will compromise the District's ab' ity to carry out the v ters' mandate. This special district has a very low propert tax rate, at 1.7 cents/$100 of assessed value. We are mandated by the voters t provide the unique function o acquiring and preserving open space, and the facilities we provide are of local, regional and statewide significa e. I urge you to reject any budget proposal that does not exempt the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District om the loss of AB 8 funds, or provide for complete replacement of any loss of revenue. Sincerely, Betsy Crowder President, Board of Directors Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District BC/mcs cc: Board of Directors Open Space . . . for room to breathe 20th Anniversary 1972-1992 330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone:415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485 General Manager:Herbert Grench Board of Oirectors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wir Funding History and Profile of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District • In 1973, voters overwhelmingly approved formation of the District with property tax funding set at the equivalent of 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed value. • After 1978's Proposition 13, the District lost about 60 percent of its annual property tax revenue. • By shifting school property tax money to cities, counties and special districts, and augmenting school funds directly, the state was able to provide so-called "bailout" funds. This still left the District with an annual property tax revenue reduction of approximately 32 percent. • This put the District's property tax revenue rate at 1.7 cents per $100 of assessed value, one of the lowest property tax rates in the state. • In fiscal year 1993-94, the District will receive approximately $10 million in property tax revenues, of which an estimated $3.6 million is "bailout" money. Y • Debt service for past notes and bond issues will amount to about 58 percent of the 1993-94 property tax revenues, leaving a minimal amount for maintenance, operations, development and new open space acquisitions. Prop.13& 1993 P�rop.13 "Bailout 1993 Potendal Reduction District's Property Tax Rate(per$too of assessed value) 2.5¢ ...... ..... ...... ..... ..... ..... .... 1.7Q -- 4- Deletion of all 1.0¢ ... ..... 'k. "bailout"funds /Ordy 1.71 Goes To MI20SD $1 Of Local Property Tax Within The District 98.30 Goes Tt;Cities,bounties, Schoga Districts And Other Special Dji't cts —Debt Service .....:::...: iadd-Operations -Acquisition Open Space 1 I 3 r MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT April 13, 1993 Honorable Dan Hauser, Chair Assembly Housing & Community Development State Capitol, Room 2003 Sacramento, CA 95814 i Dear Assemblyman Hauser: On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, I wish to express our strong support for AB 1052. The bill would allow public agencies to acquire agricultural land without the potential of providing relocation assistance to lessees of the property, provided that the agency honors all I,r the terms of the lease. The bill proposes a common sense, equitable treatment of those parties holding leasehold interests of agricultural land without imposing a financial burden on those public entities that can live with the terms of the lease. We appreciate your carrying this legislation. Sincerely yours, Herbert Grench General Manager HG:ej cc: MROSD Board of Directors Ralph Heim, Heim, Noack & Spahnn Open Space . . . for room to breathe 20th Anniversary 1972-1992 330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 • Phone:415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485 General Manager:Herbert Grench Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit t MEMORANDUM April 29, 1993 TO: All Staff FROM: Craig Britton, Acting General Manager Attached for your review is the refined listing of general manager characteristics developed at last night's workshop. The five Board members present (Nonette and Teena were absent) sorted the characteristics into the categories of: MUST Something that, if the candidate did not meet this criteria or have this characteristic in significant degree, the candidate simply wasn't to be considered. WANT Things that are very important but wouldn't necessarily disqualify a person if didn't have. NICE Great if they also had this. SET ASIDE Not sure what characteristic is/means -- put aside for now. The next step is for individual Board members to review the characteristics and relay what wording changes and/or consolidation of characteristics they'd propose. The Board will also be submitting recommended additions, changes, and deletions in the portions of the general manager job specification (attached) that was part of the April 28 packet. After receiving input from the Board by May 12, Jean and Deirdre will be consolidating all the information for presentation to the Board on May 26. The Board scheduled another workshop for the 26th with Geoff Ball again facilitating the session. Please give me a call or stop by if you have any questions. II. Characteristics of General . Manager (sorted) A. MANAGEMENT APPROACH 1 . MUST a) Progressive Management style - willing to be in forefront b ) Understanding about health of organization� - carry forward stud Si el - Sip el c) Team management orientation; Demonstrated successful management experience in a team approach setting d) Able to delegate efficiently and manage well. Open to staff input strong leadership, accountability with staff e) Committed to value of DISTRICTS employees f) Proactive on identifying problems and actively develops solutions to problems 2. WANT a ) Non-adversarial superv. and subordinates - ideas flow from everywhere to save money and cut costs. b ) Non-bureaucrat - (not unchanging status quo) willing to make changes, sees big picture c) MBWA - management by walking around d) Open door policy e) Willing to take the initiative with the board (commenting, recommending) on policy f) Not threatened by Board speaking to people under GM. 3 . NICE 4. SET ASIDE 5 . a) Products oriented - innovative management B. PERSONNEL 1 . MUST 2. WANT a) Experienced with labor relations, particularly negotiations b ) Provide equal opportunity ! Promote 1 treat equally [qualified] women and minorities _ c) Develop and nurture managers under GM MROSD Notes August 27, 1956 3:38:26 PM Page 1 of 4 II. Characteristics of General Manager (sorted) A. MANAGEMENT APPROACH I . MUST a) Progressive Management style - willing to be in forefront b) Understanding about health of organization - carry forward Sipel study - c) Team management orientation; Demonstrated successful management experience in a team approach setting d) Able to delegate efficiently and manage well. Open to staff input strong leadership, accountability with staff i e) Committed to value of DISTRICTS employees f) Proactive on identifying problems and actively develops solutions to problems 2. WANT a ) Non-adversarial superv. and subordinates - ideas flow from everywhere to save money and cut costs. b) Non-bureaucrat - (not unchanging status quo) willing to make changes, sees big picture c) MBIVA - management by walking around d) Open door policy e) Willing to take the initiative with the board (commenting, recommending) on policy f) Not threatened by Board speaking to people under GM. 3 . NICE 4. SET ASIDE a) Products _ or iented innovative manna ement 5 . B. PERSONNEL 1 . 1LIUST 2. WANT a) Experienced with labor relatio ns, pa rticularly p cularly negotiations b ) Provide equal opportunityi Promo te 1 treat equally all v [qualified] women an d minorities _ In'IIIO ' _ c) Develop and nurture managers under GM MROSD Notes August 27, 1956 3:38:26 PM Page 1 of 4 a) Demonstrated capability in advocacy( working with business, environmental, , elected. b ) Strong at working with other agencies; regional not parochial c) Persuasive skills at all governmental levels; 2. WANT a) Politically astute, can (understand and interpret and predict and read) public, elected officials; an intuitive pollster b ) Politically connected (existing contacts) at a national, state and local level 3 . NICE 4. SET ASIDE F. PERSONAL VALUES AND BELIEFS 1 . MUST a) Fair, ethical, high level of integrity b ) Strong environmental values and beliefs 2. WANT a) Recognizing diversity of values in staff. (e.g. land mgmt. and acquisition b ) Knows the value of environmental education c) Not be presently or recently investigated by another public agency d ) Be able to put aside personal biases 3 . NICE 4. SET ASIDE G. GENERAL / INTERPERSONAL SKILLS I . MUST a) Proven leadership skills b ) Good judgment c) Budget management skills overview and detail d) Demonstrated financial responsibility e) Good people skills f) Able to build effective working relationships with Board of Directors 2. WANT a) Abilities as strategic planner b ) Basic legal skills related to contracts MROSD Notes August 27, 1956 3:38:26 PM Page 3 of 4 �4 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS TO: An elected seven member Board of Directors representing the citizens within the wards of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD) in Santa Clara San Mateo and Santa Cruz Counties. BASIC FUNCTION: As the chief administrative officer, provides direction and general management to the overall activities and services of MROSD in accordance with Section 5500 et seq, of the Public Resources Code, Article 3, Division 5, Chapter 3 (Regional Park, Park and Open-Space, and Open-Space Districts). PRINCIPAL AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY: 1. Overall Administration of the District's erations Provides vision and leadership to achieve optimum organizational effectiveness. Hires, directs, develops and evaluates management staff and support personnel. Provides leadership and participates in management team. Manages budget to ensure effective allocation of resources to achieve priority objectives. Ensures effective management of District's programs, including acquisition, planning, operations, public affairs, and administration. Ensures District open space preserves and their public uses and resources are managed effectively. 2. Community and Legislative Outreach Ensures avenues for public involvement in District activities, including individuals,public interest groups, legislators, local government officials and entities, businesses, etc. Plans and carries out the District's legislative program. Ensures active outreach to all District constituents. 3. Short and Lon Term Planning and_Review - d Review Meets with Board of Directors to discuss problems, projects and programs being considered or proposed by Board and/or staff. Coordinates multi-year strategic planning for all departments to determine the needs of the District, and establish priorities for programs on-going and proposed. (over) DRAFT MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER REPORTS TO: An elected seven member Board of Directors representing the citizens within the wards of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District(MROSD) in Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Santa Cruz Counties. BASIC FUNCTION: As the chief administrative officer, provides dire ction n an d d general management to the overall activities and services of MROSD in accordance with Section 5500 et seq, of the Public Resources Code, Article 3, Division 5, Chapter 3 (Regional Park, Park and Open-Space, and Open-Space Districts). PRINCIPAL AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY: 1• gverall Administration of the District's Operations Provides vision and leadership to achieve optimum organizational effectiveness. Hires, directs, develops and evaluates management staff and support personnel. Provides leadership and participates in management team. Manages budget to ensure effective allocation of resources to achieve priority objectives. Ensures effective _management of District's programs, including acquisition, planning, operations, public affairs, and administration. Ensures District open space preserves and their public uses and resources are managed effectively. 2. Community and Legislative Outreach Ensures avenues for public invo lvement olvement in District activities, including individuals,public interest groups, legislators, local government officials and entities, businesses, etc. Plans and carries out the District's legislative program. Ensures active outreach to all District constituents. 3. Short and Lone Term Plannina and Review Meets wit h Bo ard of Dire ctors for s to discuss problems, projects and programs being considered or proposed by Board and/or staff. Coordinates multi-year strategic planning for all departments to det ermine ne the the District, and establish priorities, for programs on-going and proposed. Beds of (over) I Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT April 29, 1993 Edward and Idonna Snow 24871 Olive Tree Lane Los Altos Hills, CA 94024-6427 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Snow: ' As you requested, the District has researched the issue of access over Olive Tree Lane. First I'd like to summarize our findings on patrol access. The District believes it has a right to use Olive Tree Lane for patrol and emergency access to the former Vidovich property. Such access is necessary to the District and, we believe, beneficial to all property owners. Efficient patrol patterns enhance the pubiic'safety and encourage patrol attention to diverse areas of-the preserve. The District's primary interest at this time is in a continuation of the past use of Olive Tree Lane that provides access for the District employees, agents, and contractors. The District's private easement derives from long established use of the easement by the District and by the former owners of the District property. The District and prior owners of the District property have used the Olive Tree Lane access whenever they had occasion or need to do so. For many years the District used the access almost daily with the knowledge and support of the former owner, George Neary. The District is also aware that each prior owner of the property, the Nearys and the Vidoviches, used the access from Olive Tree Lane routinely and maintained a lock on-the gate for that purpose. The District's use is well documented. As far as the District has been able to determine, that access has never been substantially interfered with by any of the owners of the Olive Tree Hill West subdivision. The period of use far exceeds the five years necessary to create use by prescription. While the District believes this right of access could be established in court if , necessary, all parties should be able to work out an amicable agreement as to the level, nature and frequency of use. The District is always willing to listen to the concerns of the " District's neighbors and to attempt to work out solutions that will alleviate those concerns. This includes possible participation in the cost of maintaining the road in a manner consistent with the District's level of use of the road. Second, with regard to the right of the public for access on Olive Tree Lane, we are aware of facts that support a right of the public to use the street. However, it must be emphasized that it is not the District's goal to have Olive Tree Lane declared a public street. _ The District respects the privacy of the neighborhoods in all of the areas adjacent to our preserves, and to the extent possible, mitigates the impact of the public use of the property. Open Space . . . for room to breathe - 20th Anniversary - 1972-1992 330 Distel Circle - Los Altos, California 94022-1404 - Phone: 415-691-1200 - FAX:415-691-0485 General Manager:Herbert Grench Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit i Olive Tree Lane, whether public or private, is clearly not designed or situated to provide for public access. There is no space for public parking. There is no gate for public entry, and the District has no intention to install one. The District will continue to enforce the policy that this is not a point for public entry to, or exit from, the preserve. However, if local residents regularly use this point for entry, and other parties mount a legal challenge, the residents might have difficulty legally preventing other persons from walking on Olive Tree Lane to or from the preserve. The District's belief that the public may have a claim of access is clarified by reviewing the legal interpretation of the term "public street." A public street is merely a street that the public has a right to use. A public street is not necessarily a street that is accepted by, or maintained by, a governmental entity. Public rights in a street can be created by implication from the acts of the owner of the property and of the public. For I example, a public street may be created where an owner intends to create a public street by offering it for dedication in a subdivision map and the public then uses the street without objection. This is true even where a governmental entity has rejected the offer of dedication. In 1967, the Santa Clara County Superior Court heard the case of Nelson v. Dunn P10581 - 174836. The court found that a portion of road, extending from a cul-de-sac on Olive Tree Lane, connected two subdivision tracts (Olive Tree Hill Tract 2958 and Olive Tree Hill West Tract 3672) and was a public street. The court based its conclusion on the theory of common law dedication and the following factors: (1) the recorded subdivision map showed an actual intent to dedicate the street to the public; (2) the public's acceptance was shown by public use for an uninterrupted period since October of 1963; (3) the owner of that section of street permitted the public to use the street, without objection, for a long period; and (4) the circumstances of the acquiescence (permitted use) rebutted any supposition that the use was permissive only (i.e. under a license). It is important to note that cases in which the use has been for less than five years require stronger proof than where the use has exceeded- five years. In Nelson v. Dunn the court found the necessary proof although the use continued for less than five years. That use has continued unabated ever since. W.G. Dunn was one of the defendants in the lawsuit and he was one of the partners who created Olive Tree Hill West. Olive Tree Lane is a street showing on the subdivision map. The subdividers offered the street for dedication. The public's acceptance has been implied by use, and that acceptance has been acquiesced in by the owners of the underlying fee. When all factors are taken into consideration a court would probably conclude that all of Olive Tree Lane is a public street by common-law dedication. In summary, the District has provided this information because the residents of Olive Tree Lane asked us to do so. The District does not intend to pursue the claim that Olive Tree Lane is a public street, or to encourage public access through this route. The District's _ use of the street is unlikely to cause any significant adverse effects on the property owners, or bearing on the,public street issue. The District does not intend to encourage public access Olive Tree Lane, whether public or private, is clearly not designed or situated to provide for public access. There is no space for public parking. There is no gate for public entry, and the District has no intention to install one. The District will continue to enforce the policy that this is not a point for public entry to, or exit from, the preserve. However, if local residents regularly use this point for entry, and other parties mount a legal challenge, the residents might have difficulty legally preventing other persons from walking on Olive Tree Lane to or from the preserve. The District's belief that the public may have a claim of access is clarified by reviewing the legal interpretation of the term "public street." A public street is merely a street that the public has a right to use. A public street is not necessarily a street that is accepted by, or maintained by, a governmental entity. Public rights in a street can be created by implication from the acts of the owner of the property and of the public. For example, a public street may be created where an owner intends to create a public street by offering it for dedication in a subdivision map and the public then uses the street without objection. This is true even where a governmental entity has rejected the offer of dedication. In 1967, the Santa Clara County Superior Court heard the case of Nelson v. Dunn P10581 - 174836. The court found that a portion of road, extending from a cul-de-sac on Olive Tree Lane, connected two subdivision tracts (Olive Tree Hill Tract 2958 and Olive Tree Hill West Tract 3672) and was a public street. The court based its conclusion on the theory of common law dedication and the following factors: (1) the recorded subdivision map showed an actual intent to dedicate the street to the public; (2) the public's acceptance was shown by public use for an uninterrupted period since October of 1963; (3) the owner of that section of street permitted the public to use the street, without objection, for a long period; and (4) the circumstances of the acquiescence (permitted use) rebutted any supposition that the use was permissive only (i.e. under a license). It is important to note that cases in which the use has been for less than five years require stronger proof than where the use has exceeded five years. In Nelson v. Dunn the court found the necessary proof although the use continued for less than five years. That use has continued unabated ever since. W.G. Dunn was one of the defendants in the lawsuit and he was one of the.partners who created Olive Tree Hill West. Olive Tree Lane is a street showing on the subdivision map. The subdividers offered the street for dedication. The public's acceptance has been implied by use, and that acceptance has been acquiesced in by the owners of the underlying fee. When all factors are taken into consideration a court would probably conclude that all of Olive Tree Lane is a public street by common-law dedication. In summary, the District has provided this information because the residents of Olive Tree Lane asked us to do so. The District does not intend to pursue the claim that Olive Tree Lane is a public street, or to encourage public access through this route. The District's use of the street is unlikely to cause any significant adverse effects on the property owners, or bearing on the,public street issue. The District does not intend to encourage public access on the street, and if asked will state that Olive Tree Lane is not intended as a point of public access to the District preserve. The publicity surrounding the District's purchase of the Vidovich property has caused an increase in the public's interest in investigating ways to get into the property. We are willing to work with you to address this problem, and it has been our experience that in time, as the allowable access points are clarified, this activity will die down. I hope this information is helpful to you in understanding the District's position in this situation. I apologize for the delay in providing it. Hopefully it will encourage you to take advantage of our offer to replace the existing gate, which carries no obligation or expectation with respect to public access. Sincerely, Randy An �erson,�� Planning Manager RA/dmz , cc: L. Craig Britton, Assistant General Manager John Escobar, Operations Manager CalPAW 1994 Parks and Wildlife Initiative will provide nearly two billion dollars for parks and open space ♦ for the conservation of wildlife,wetlands,forestland,agricultural land,and historic and cultural resources ♦ and for trails and recreation throughout California.- The Bay Area Ridge Trail will receive fifteen million dollars for the acquisition of interests in land and for trail development for the Ridge Trail in Alameda,Contra Costa, Merin Napa,San Francisco, p c sco,San Mateo,Santa Clara,Solaro,and Sonoma counties. The success of CalPAW 94 depends on the collective action of environmental,recre- ation,and community groups throughout California,including the Bay Area Ridge Trail Council. At stake are California's most valuable natural and historical resources—its land,its communities,its heritage,and the quality of life these amenities contribute to the health and vigor of the Bay Area's growing population and the region's ecological vitality! A Community of Support: Conservation in Action ♦ CalPAW 94 is sponsored by The Planning ♦ The Bay Area Ridge Trail Council's goal and Conservation League,in consultation is to collect 50,000 signatures in the nine with hundreds of park and recreation groups Bay Area counties on behalf of parks,open statewide including the Bay Area Ridge space,and trails throughout California. Trail Council. ♦ We need 350 volunteers—park and trail ♦ 700,000 signatures need to be collected users,environmentalists,naturalists—a state-wide to qualifiy the initiative for the committed community of support to help June 1994 ballot. A majority vote will be collect signatures. Volunteers will join Ridge needed in June of 1994 for passage. Trail staff and Board in this team effort. Your Volunteer Contribution for Conservation On In May the Planning and Conservation League will host a series of one-hour training workshops. All volunteers are asked to participate in one training session prior to signature gathering. You choose the time and location best for you. OD Then between June and September we will call on you to staff a table—assisted by a companion or two—at an event,a shopping center,or at your favorite community corner. OD Your goal will be to collect 150 signatures over the course of a four month period,a task that will likely take about 10 hours of your time spread out over the summer and early fall. You will: N contribute to a conservation effort of state-wide importance which if successful on the June 1994 ballot will yield hundreds of millions of What's In it dollars for parks and open space in the Bay Area including$15 million For Me? for the Ridge Trail; • -join community conservationists in the fun and satisfaction of a grassroots environmental effort; N learn even more about local parks and open space issues; -gain leadership skills in trail advocacy; _ �►be acknowledged and thanked for your contributions of time and talent. Make A Commitment to Conservation-Volunteer Todayl Please return the enclosed postcard indicating'your`interest in volunteering. Select a training workshop to attend(see schedule on reverse side) Schedule the date on your personal calender. Once we receive your card we'will call fYo ,answer anY.9 uestions o u have and give you directions to the workshop session you choose.Begining in June we will work with you to define locations,dates,and times best suited to your schedule to launch your signature gathering effort. a `, L, ,ti •< •Fort ru a xnffi ixroneuswx coxrwcr ° g�y4 BAnsAaA Rica,E4 curve Dutsclox BAY AxaA 1tm6E TnAa C o_ca.,311 CAr Foaxu&r 3Ax FxArrcaco CA"104 r # GrBt+ro,Kmirr,Ftu,CoonnmAroa(AtwaEOA, PMRA,UMA ZJ N iCwu AV Ni x'ocotIl77711Es) (510);58A-8898 !i a (� p ,�# Dg sMumur�x Ferro UOWRIDEN son(MAnmr NAP; tsco,SoxoxA ARD SO' o aou s i wi 823} 39 2 EAST BAY/SAN FRANCISCO ignature Gathering Training Set ns Alameda Thursday,May 6,6:00-7:00pm Hayward Area Recreation District . NORTH BAY SOUTH BAY 1099 E Street,Hayward Marlin San Mateo l6Thursday,May 27,7:00-8:00pm AMonday,May 17,6:00-7:00pm RYWednesday,May 5,11:30-12:30pm Hayward Area Recreation District Merin Center Exhibit Hall Tuesday,May 25,7:30-8:30 pm 1099 E Street,Hayward Community Room,San Rafael Coyote Point Museum,San Mateo Contra Costa Napa Santa Clara P6Wednesday,May 19,7:00-8:00pm l0-Tuesday,May 25,6:00-7:00pm o-Tuesday,May 11,7:30-8:30pm EBRPD Hdqt.(former) Napa Parks and Recreation office Greenbelt Alliance Office 11500 Skyline Boulevard,Oakland . 1100 West Street,Napa 1922 The Alameda,San Jose 0-Thursday,May 13,7:30-8:30pm San Francisco Solano Midpeninsula Regional OSD o-Wednesday,May 5,6:00-7:00pm osMonday May 10,6:00-7:00pm 330 Distel Circle,Los Altos Trust for Public Land Vallejo Community Center 0-Tuesday,May 18,6:00-7:00 pm 116 New Montgomery Street 225 Amador Street,Vallejo Midpeninsula Regional OSD o Wednesday,May 19, 6:00-7:00pm 330 Distel Circle,Los Altos Sierra Club,730 Polk Street Sonoma AsThursday,May 27,7:30-8:30pm m6Monday,May 24, 6:00-7:00pm vWednesday,May 12,6:00-7:00pm Greenbelt Alliance SB Office Trust for Public Land Dee Swanhuyser's home 1922 The Alameda,San Jose 116 New Montgomery Street 1800 Jonive Road,Sebastopol r-Wednesday,June 2,6:00-7:00pm Sierra Club,730 Polk Street II s5 ,. - INMN[SU .YIN mpvrra n h llln4 Ylla15 Vlna011ly�II[ 11JNt10J llVtll 37010 ', Make a Commitment to California Parks and Wildlife Volunteer Today! What's Inside: ✓ CaIPAW 1994 news Tips for your involvement ✓; Schedule of volunteer training sessions; Y e Nearly 2 billion dollars for parks, open space, aizd recreation— to.succeed we need y/our su ort { 1 alarms y, 5 ,x 1 #r4'" ,.�r a.�•1+rt't m`§yg' #'C'3 $' f ow e J f � � A3A f� °.� {� ,ti* i , :¢d 1 y , ��� -� '��� � "`�• � {t r-�¢f§ t� :,j,}qw,y �t'r;•.i,,t��r '";' kY � � �` $1 �' „��i ��.C�t 'r��t�"�� 1 � y� �f p �{���F J,„ S 4 Y #7"�����', �r g�•�e': r y DRAFT CA LPA W '94 Signature Gathering Workplan (prepared April 14, 1993) Overview: The Bay Area Ridge Trail was included in the $2 billion dollar bond act at a funding level of$15 million, The initiative was filed with the Attorney General's office on March 26. The act will be placed on the June 1994 ballot. PCL's signature gathering goal is 700,000 state-wide. Campaign costs not including in-kind support will total approximately $1.5 million dollars. Campaign Mana ement( ARTC ) Barbara Rice will serve as project manager with Dee Swanhuyser and Glenn Kirby serving as field managers(staff). Dee will handle the North Bay and San Francisco and Glenn will cover the East Bay, and San Mateo and Santa Clara counties. Volunteer coordinators(1-3) will be recruited for each of the nine Bay Area counties to assist in volunteer recruitment, scheduling, and deployment(volunteers). Field managers(Dee & Glenn) will be primarily responsible for managing the local recruitment, training, scheduling, and deployment of volunteers working with BARTC's county volunteer coordinators and the Planning and Conservation League's (PCL's) regional coordinators. PCL regional coordinators are responsible for working with over 50 groups in the Bay Area to maximize the effectiveness of the signature-gathering process. PCL regional coordinators will assist as needed providing guidance in the selection of signature-gathering locations, coordinating with other groups, securing permission for signature gathering where needed, running training workshops for volunteers, and providing necessary equipment. BARTC's regional office will provide support in recruiting volunteers through providing resource lists and through producing and distributing written recruitment materials. Barbara Rice will serve as liaison with PCL's signature gathering manager and the Sacramento office and will be responsible for overall project management in consultation with the Executive Committee and Board of Directors. Volunteer Recruitment, Training, & Signature Gathering Volunteer Recruitment Of the 700,000 signatures required state-wide, about half will be collected in the nine-county Bay Area with targets as follows: East Bay(100,000), Marin(40,000), Napa-S olano(20,000), San Francisco(40,000), Sonoma(40,000), and South Bay(100,000). Over 50 groups will be involved in collecting signatures in the Bay Area. _ The Bay Area Ridge Trail Council has committed to gathering 50,000 signatures. l Allotments by County & Volunteer Recruitment Targets County Targeted Areas # Signatures "Volunteers Needed(active) Alameda Berkeley/Oakland 7000 47 Fremont/Hayward 3000 20 Castro Valley Contra Costa Orinda/Walnut Creek 5,000 33 Lafayette/Moraga Santa Clara San Jose 4,000 27 Los Altos/ 3,500 23 Mountain View/ Sunnyvale Palo Alto 2,500 17 San Mateo Pacifica/Half Moon Bay 5,000 33 Daly City/San Bruno San Mateo/Redwood City/Portola Valley San Francisco n/a 10,000 67 Marin San Rafael/Novato 3,500 23 Mill Valley West Marin 1,500 10 Sonoma Petaluma/Sonoma 2,000 13 Santa Rosa Sebastopol Napa Napa 1,500 10 Solana Vallejo/Benicia 1,500 10 Fairfield TOTAL 50,000 333 ** For BARTC's purposes let's assume on average each volunteer recruited will commit to working three 3-hour shifts over a four-month period(June 3 thru October 5), resulting in the collection of about 150 signatures pr volunteer. (50 signatures per volunteer per 3-hour shift. This calculation is based on averaging _ and is therefore a rough estimate. Volunteer recruitment needs will vary significantly by area as will level of contribution by each volunteer. Allotments by County & Volunteer Recruitment Targets County Targeted Areas # Signatures "Volunteers Needed(active) Alameda Berkeley/Oakland 7000 47 Fremont/Hayward 3000 20 Castro Valley Contra Costa Orinda/Walnut Creek 5,000 33 Lafayette/Moraga Santa Clara San Jose 4,000 27 Los Altos/ 3,500 23 Mountain View/ Sunnyvale Palo Alto 2,500 17 San Mateo Pacifica/Half Moon Bay 5,000 33 Daly City/San Bruno San Mateo/Redwood City/Portola Valley San Francisco n/a 10,000 67 Marin San Rafael/Novato 3,500 23 Mill Valley West Marin 1,500 to Sonoma Petalurna/Sonoma 2,000 13 Santa Rosa Sebastopol Napa Napa 1,500 10 Solano Vallejo/Benicia 1,500 '10 Fairfield TOTAL 50,000 333 For BARTCs purposes let's assume on average each volunteer recruited will commit to working three 3-hour shifts over a four-month period(June 3 thru October 5), resulting in the collection of about 150 signatures pr volunteer. (50 signatures per volunteer per 3-hour shift. This calculation is based on averaging and is therefore a rough estimate. 'Volunteer recruitment needs will vary significantly by area as will level of'contribution by each volunteer. r n Suggested Goals by Pool of Volunteers Pool Number Signatures Shifts/vol. Sub-total volunteers per volunteer 3 hour Signatures (333) Board Dir. 33 200 4 6600 Staff 9 200 4 1800 County Comm. 81 150 3 12,150 Volunteers(other) 160 150 3 24,000 Org, Partners 50 120 2 6,000 Total 50,550 Volunteer Training PCL's goals are to train all volunteers by the end of May so that deployment can begin June 5. BARTC will host training sessions in conjunction with local and regional committee/Board meetings and at other times to meet volunteer training goals. Training Goals by County County Volunteers Needed Average # Training sessions per training session per county(min.) Alameda 67 15 4 Contra Costa 33 2 Santa Clara 67 4 San Mateo 33 2 San Francisco 67 4 Marin 33 2 Sonoma 13 .1 Napa 10 1 Solano 10 1 Total 21 A comprehensive schedule will be available by April 22. I Volunteer Training(continued) Volunteers will be recruited via mail with follow-up telephone contact by field managers and volunteer coordinators. A recruitment package will be designed, produced, and mailed by BARTC's regional office. Volunteers will be trained by PCL's regional coordinators. Mid-April First class mailing to volunteers and Board of Directors Bulk mailing to members Week of April 26(beginning) and on-going(untii goals are met) Follow-up telephoning to targeted pools of volunteers. Coordinate with organization partners to gain commitment of additional non-BARTC volunteers. Gain commitments from volunteers to attend training sessions considering goals. Follow-up mailing to volunteers only, dependent on need. May 3 through June 4 Sponsor training sessions. Volunteer Signature gathering (June 5 - October 3) There are 18 weekends(36 days) between June 5 and October 3, inclusive. Volunteers will be assigned to locations in teams of 2, for a 3 hour shift. Deployment locations and number of shifts needed per weekend will vary dependent on venue, availability of volunteers , county goals , and progress to date. Field managers will be responsible for developing and maintaining county schedules(date, location, shifts, volunteer assignments) to meet defined goals, working with PCL and the county committees to identify appropriate locations and shifts for signature gathering. Field managers will work with volunteer coordinators in recruiting and deploying trained volunteers and must be accessible by phone on weekends unless otherwise delegated due to personal conflicts, vacations, etc. Field managers will also be responsible for defining appropriate locations for equipment storage(tables, petitions, clipboards, etc.) pick-up, & delivery, working with PCL's regional coordinators, and for ensuring that all petitions are returned to BARTC's regional office according to established deadlines(not yet determined). PCL Contacts Jonathan Kaplan San Francisco/San Mateo/Santa Clara 415 -282-4683 Janet Michaelson East Bay 415 -474-6661 Dennis Fishwick Marin 415 -897-7946 Glenda Humiston Sonoma/Napa/Solano 707 -869-9003 Ken Masterton state-wide coordinator 415-868-1431 Volunteer Training(continued) Volunteers will be recruited via mail with follow-up telephone contact by field managers and volunteer coordinators. A recruitment package will be designed, produced, and mailed by BARTC's regional office. Volunteers will be trained by PCL's regional coordinators. Mid-April First class mailing to volunteers and Board of Directors Bulk mailing to members Week of April 26(beginning) and on-going(until goals are met) Follow-up telephoning to targeted pools of volunteers. Coordinate with organization partners to gain con-unitrnent of additional non-BARTC volunteers. Gain coinmitments from volunteers to attend training sessions considering goals. Follow-up mailing to volunteers only, dependent on need. May 3 through June 4 Sponsor training sessions. Volunteer Signature gathering (June 5 - October 3) There are 18 weekends(36 days) between June 5 and October 3, inclusive. Volunteers will be assigned to locations in teams of 2, for a 3 hour shift. Deployment locations and number of shifts needed per weekend will vary dependent on venue, availability of volunteers , county goals , and progress to date. Field managers will be responsible for developing and maintaining county schedules(date, location, shifts, volunteer assignments) to meet defined goals, working with PCL and the county committees to identify appropriate locations and shifts for signature gathering. Field managers will work with volunteer coordinators in recruiting and deploying trained volunteers and must be accessible by phone on weekends unless otherwise delegated due to personal conflicts vacations etc. Field managers will also be responsible for defining appropriate locations for equipment storage(tables, petitions, clipboards, etc.) pick-up, & delivery, working with PCL's regional coordinators, and for ensuring that all petitions are returned to BARTC's regional office according to established deadlines(not yet determined). PCL Contacts Jonathan nci an Kaplan Fr co/San Mateo/Santa Clara 415 -282-4683 _ p S a s -4 4-Janet Michaelson East Bay 415 7 6661 Dennis Fishwick Marin 415 -897-7946 Glenda flumiston Sonoma/Napa/Solano 707 -869-9003 Ken Masterton state-wide coordinator 415-868-1431 The Prop A Team The Trust for Public Land and the California Park and Recreation Society Esther Feldman will discuss how she directed and orchestrated the Prop A campaign,highlighting the importance of mobilizing public support. Ms. present Feldman was assistant campaign manager for Prop 70 which provided$776 million for California parks. She is currently with the Santa Monica Moun- tains Conservancy. Prop Dean Misczynski will provide a legislative update and an overview of assessment districts. Mr.Misczynski served as a consultant to California's Senate Office of Research a::d the Subcommittee on Bonded Indebtedness. Jim Moore will discuss th-importance of public opinion polling before launching a campaign for a:_assessment district. Mr.Moore is the founder The A Team__ _ of Jim Moore Methods,a cc_sulting firm with expertise in political polling. Larry Remer will discuss political strategies and direct mailing techniques The team who put together Los Angeles used in campaigns and ballot measures. Mr.Remer is the president of The Primacy Group,a political consulting firm. County's successful$540 million Bill Harvey will discuss planning stages for Prop A from a munty park's Proposition A for parks and open space perspective. Mr.Harvey is Chief of the Contract and Concessionaire Ser- brings to you: vices Division of the L.A.County Parks and Recreation Department. Angelique Lucero will explain the preparation of an engineer's report, A how-to workshop where you will learn to and its role in establishing an assessment district. Ms.Lucero is Manager of develop your own ballot measure and create the special District Division at willdan Associates. and implement a Landscape and Lighting Act Masood Sohaili will discuss legal requirements for establishing an assess- Assessment District ment district. Mr.Sohaili is a corporate lawyer with O'Melveny and Myers. Jim Park will discuss the effects of the assessment district on L.A.County's park programs. Mr.Park is the Chief of Planning and Project Man- Sacramento agement in the L.A.County Parks and Recreation Department. June 11, 1993 Curt Robertson will discuss implementing Prop A at the county level. Mr. Robertson is the Program Administrator for Prop A in the L.A.County Parks and Recreation Department. Brain Curreywill discuss Newport Beach the current legal status of assessment districts June 16, 1993 and recent rulings by the California Supreme Court. Mr.Currey is a litigator with O'Melveny and Myers. T s + �r w_ Al Who should attend Sacramento Anyone involved in acquisition and management of parklands, Friday,June 11,1993 including: The Capitol Plaza Halls ♦ City and county park and recreation officials 1025 Ninth Street,Second Floor ♦ City managers,financial officers,and elected officials 8:30 am to 5:00 pm ♦ Land trusts,community groups,and individuals interested in alternative financing for parks and open space What you will learn Newport Beach In this hands-on workshop,you'll learn from an experienced Wednesday,June 16,1993 team how to design and develop your own ballot measure and Landscape and-Lighting Act Assessment District,including: The Dunes ♦ How Prop A evolved,and the opportunities it presents 1131 Back Bay Drive ♦ Steps to take in implementing an assessment district, & 0 am to 5:00 pm including its impact on your park programs ♦ Managing the different components of an assessment district ♦ Technical aspects of establishing an assessment district, including drafting an engineer's report and following legal Enrollment is limited,please RSVP early requirements RSVP by May 26, 1993 ♦ The importance of mobilizing public support See enclosed maps for detailed directions ♦ How to identify and create public support using direct mail and polling $60 per person includes all conference materials,continental breakfast and lunch. Please use the enclosed response card and ♦ How recent court decisions and legislative efforts may make envelope for your RSVP and payment. it easier to create assessment districts for parks ♦ Other financing strategies available,their benefits and For further information please contact Jennifer Greene at drawbacks The Trust for Public Land (415)495-5660. s � - 1 Who should attend Sacramento Anyone involved in acquisition and management of parklands, Friday,June 11,1993 including: The Capitol Plaza Halls ♦ City and county park and recreation officials 1025 Ninth Street,Second Floor ♦ City managers,financial officers,and elected officials 8:30amto5:00pm ♦ Land trusts,community groups,and individuals interested in alternative financing for parks and open space What you will learn Newport Beach In this hands-on workshop,you'll learn from an experienced Wednesday,June 16,1993 team how to design and develop your own ballot measure and Landscape and-Lighting Act Assessment District,including: The Dunes ♦ How Prop A evolved,and the opportunities it presents 1131 Back Bay Drive ♦ Steps to take in implementing an assessment district, 8:210 am to 5:00 pm including its impact on your park programs ♦ Managing the different components of an assessment district ♦ Technical aspects of establishing an assessment district, including drafting an engineer's report and following legal Enrollment is limited,please RSVP early requirements RSVP by May 26, 1993 ♦ The importance of mobilizing public support See enclosed:naps for detailed directions ♦ How to identify and create public support using direct mail and polling $60 per person includes all conference materials,continental breakfast and lunch. Please use the enclosed response card and ♦ How recent court decisions and legislative efforts may make envelope for your RSVP and payment. it easier to create assessment districts for parks ♦ Other financing strategies available,their benefits and For further information please contact Jennifer Greene at drawbacks The Trust for Public Land (415) 495-5660. Prop A: A Pot of Gold for L.A.'s Parks An unprecedented campaign in Los Angeles County led to the successful passage of Prop A last November, making T H E The Trust for Public Land is a available$540 million to acquire much-needed open space, TRUST national nonprofit land restore natural lands and improve existing? F o R conservation organization p recreational PUBLIC dedicated to protecting land for facilities. LAND people where they live, work and play. Since 1972, The Trust for Public Land,working with government agencies and Conserving Land community groups, has for People preserved over 700,000 acres of land with environmental, t' r•*- :-- recreational historic and cultural significance. J The California Park and Recreation Society provides park - and recreation professionals and interested citizens with the ability auEoaNu PARK AND and .resources to enhance their RECRFATON SOCIETY inc leadership role in meeting the P11 to by SOOT Paris, park, recreation, and related community service needs of the Prop A toc.:an existing financing tool--assessment districts people of California. --and crei_ _ad anew and timely mechanism for funding city and count;r parks. Members of the dynamic team respon- sible for _:s passage will answer your questions about Printed on recycled paper alternativ financing techniques and provide insight into this intro ..five campaign. J.. J J J Friday, June 11th - Sacramento JJ r � Ta Ir I u NORTH B bT.A>! A ST, a �+• u `b4 bT Pa C••� ST. .: 99 P:1+ c w. aT O ST. `i fin" a1 •w ST a$~ E F a a ►M%w T `° N i �r(� F 6 ^ i o.i �" Non • � T.lSQ N ST. z • wNTOWN o �Y•�' K •. l ,•-�� ,, ,PVT�J+ •- •.�M A7ai L t+V".Er sL1A6 b Y `I 1 • 4 ST.GI � YK f Y dt m Y ST.Z Z F � T f1 Qo� AY Y, N X Ol M LL d Own n M P N Yf� N r ST Hr7- P Y � e+j� i 51 1a•.y bT. C a o w R � � Yf Yf a OUil �• ~ f 9 � o P ^ • Pf Me 0 P� v�i 6T. P °2 P bT. BSI M O w �- � 2 •� 6T. 61 r S nae.� ST, b SE wT. V _ T " O 6 k 2 O ° 2 ST. V n ( Z ST. T V T. F*,d L~ a' sS ,sT w 1 • ' sT j w e�i w Y+ e T ST. � K sT. NS• \ T K u e B OA N a V S ST. S. w eu• - . .wr.cA BROADwA t 9_ w t AV. -M 1ST �' + -L\/ > 1ST = , tions on back �. O u Y,yty1 �KM1NT fEVEM S f AT 'fCWt O Z OAT /• �, .. 7 6 LL n i` J v ]1 I 1 1 N no. / 1 flw j T ...r•I...h....OVJ�nM.trMr'Mf..M.�N.t4.M.M. �• t ^•,'� ��e Q.�. � ..Yfl y'�et, � � W....�F...../..�.�. aT S RON T" h ~ • 1`Oe0 p ST. 0 sL '_ G Ng1� N,1 z ���. � _ I. � •� x ' T •� 9 w ST. p I Ii F s .M F TI • ' T, 1 0 " _ wr •� er. o 4 0 1e €L `� `= er. ,_ I i a s M • '[ ! N - 1 H ST. ST. T r,nn dl, H 1 T11 _ T $ er. ?7 11 1 N ar.00 II H 1Z a. _ v •. � .� A T. 1 t ar y T: r F �.• _ 1 ST �►� 1 r. � 3 to � �� PI ][ vIDMV, / r "" aT. y.14L IL T s o-� y — �tr H � y y � `� ALJL nT 'c tt^ er IS HI 3T: 1 — N ST. � � . I•�rr a4 3I — � _ - — � N sr.. � an ST._ -- 0•$'5. Y•' mo tr ST. o� ST. •7STH S : .NiT 1•]et at 34TH 4 ST. ST. ] 1 3TH 3-H. IARIA W'I]!N aT.aNK• �• K. aANTA J •N t SIN sa nH ar. IS r_ _ [A __ ]f1N ST. a1[3 38TN 111 � x A 1 ?• \tfq�} -Ia - ]erH e— RT 301 ST. .... w'~t. Open Space �t MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT TO: Board of Directors FROM: C. Britton, Assistant General Manager DATE: May 12 , 1993 SUBJECT: F. Y. I. 1 Open Space . . . for room to breathe - 20th Anniversary - 1972-1992 330 Distel Circle - Los Altos, California 94022-1404 - Phone:415-691-1200 - FAX:415-691-0485 O General Manager:Herbert Grench Board ot'Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nanette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit California state .Association of Counties A COPY OF THIS MEMO WAS FAXED TO ALL CSAC BOARD MEMBERS AND ALL COUNTY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS, WITH A REQUEST THAT COPIES BE GIVEN TO ALL SUPERVISORS. May 3, 1993 TO: County Department Heads County Public Information Officers FROM: Victor Pottorff, Deputy Executive Director Christina Cutshaw, Director of Public Affairs CITIZENS SIEGE OF SACRAMENTO WEDNESDAY, MAY 19, 1993 11 :00AM STATE CAPITOL - WEST STEPS Phil Giarrizzo, Campaign Consultant, has been named the Coordinator for the "Citizens Siege of Sacramento." If your county is planning to participate in the Siege either by bringing a delegation of county representatives and citizens to Sacramento, or by planning local events on this day, please contact Phil immediately. Phil's number Is: (916) 448-9274 FAX (916) 448-1260. The Citizens Siege of Sacramento continues to build force with many counties committing their participation to join the statewide event. Counties are also scheduling local events such as meetings with legislative staff in district offices, news conferences with citizen participation to call for keeping property taxes local and many other media and public oriented events. Contributions are necessary in order to meet the operational expenses for the Citizens Siege of Sacramento, which is being sponsored by a coalition of local governments, labor unions, citizen groups and client advocate groups. We encourage your county to make a contribution to the Citizens Siege of Sacramento, please contact Phil Giarrizzo. 1100 X Street, Suite 1.01 / Sacramento, CA 95814-3941 / 916-327-7500 / FAX 916-441-5507 0 8 CITY OF SAN CARLO, SAN CITY TREASURER P.O.BOX 700 SAN CARLOS,CALIFORMA 94070 TELEPI IONE(415)591-7111 FAX(415)591 4818 May 5, 1993 Mr. Michael L. Foster Mid Peninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022 Dear Mr. Foster: 1 am very pleased to inform you that the last two property owners have paid their delinquent assessments applicable to the Hassler Health Home Assessment District. Enclosed is a check for principal, interest, and penalties applicable to Assessment No. 100 and 183, details of which are attached. This now closes the Hassler Health Home Assessment District. Very truly yours, Michael J. Galvin City Treasurer cc: Brian Moura, City of San Carlos 4"k--Craig Britton, MROSD RECYCLED PAPER Clai- io. 93-08 Meeti..y 93-10 Date: May 12, 1993 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT # Name Description 4167--------441.71 Acme & Sons Sanitation Sanitation Services 4168 97.91 Randy Anderson Reimbursement--Local Meeting Expense and Private Vehicle Expense 4169 11000.00 Geoff Ball & Associates Workshop Facilitator 4170 153.00 Bowers Publishing Inc. Subscription 4171 60.00 Mary Lou Buckmaster Enterprise Maintenance 4172 23.55 California Peace Officers' Resource Documents Association 4173 21.94 California Water Service Water Service 4174 60.25 Barrie D. Coate Arborist--Weeks Road 4175 66.02 Copymat Photocopier 4176 3,504.91 William Cotton & Associates,Inc. Consulting Services--Alpine Dam 4177 110.00 Alin Cummings Reimbursement---Workshop Registration 4178 227.33 Design Concepts Production of Newsletter ' 4179 998.00 Flinn, Gray & Herterich Insurance 4180 10.84 Foster Bros.Security Systems,Inc. Keys 4181 33.07 Goodco Printing 4182 1,200.85 Hertz Equipment Rental Equipment Rental 4183 329.09 Independent Business Products Office Supplies 4184 416.34 Keeble & 5huc.,hat Photographs and Equipment 4185 236.29 Konica Business Machines Maintenance Agreement 4186 37.50 Ligtelyn Communications Radio Repairs 4187 200.00 Lopez Gardening Gardening Service 4188 164.73 Los Alton Garbage Campy Dumpster Rental 4189 4,074.95 Merwin Mace Acquisition Consulting Service 4190 600.00 Magana's Building Maintenance Building Maintenance 4191 175.00 * Metro Parks Conference Registration 4192 115.70 Minton's Lumber Company Field Supplies 4193 7,500.00 ** J. Moore Methods Public Opinion Survey 4194 7,500.00 J. Moore Methods Public Opinion Survey 4195 60.00 Mara Noelle Honorarium--Docent Training 4196 529.71 Northern Energy Tank Delivery and Propane Fuel 4197 406.61 Office Depot Office Supplies 4198 196.68 Pacific Bell Telephone Service 4199 127.90 Loro Paterson Reimbursement--Uniform Expense 4200 82.07 Peninsula Blueprint, Inc. Maps and Bluelines 4201 1,600.00 * Postage by Phone Postage 4202 67.30 Precision Engravers, Inc. Name Badges 4203 61.38 Patty Quillin Reimbursement--Printing 4204 43.65 Radio Shack Office Equipment 4205 500.00 Rails to Trails Conservancy Sponsorship of Conference 4206 8.51 Rancho Harare Field Supplies 4207 1,348.58 Rich's Tire Service Vehicle Tires 4208 132.00 San Mateo Times Subsciption 4209 582.00 *** Sears Enterprise Repairs 4210 2,480.00 Eugene Sheehan Consulting Service and Equipment Rental 4211 26.22 Shell Oil Company Fuel 4212 87.45 Skyline County Water District Water Service 4213 54.12 Teater & Etc. District Map 4214 127.50 Therms Corporation Heating System Repair { 4215 170.90 Unocal Fuel * Urgent checks issued on May 4, 1993. ** Urgent check issued on April 30, 1993. ***Urgent check issued on April 29, 1993. Claims No. 93-0$ Meeting 93-10 Date: May 12, 1993 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT # Name Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4216 2,967.28 Valley Oil Company Fuel 4217 64.37 West Publishing Company Resource Documents 4218 76.91 *11 Services: Port-o-Let Sanitation Services 4219 228.52 The Workingam's Emporium Uniform Expense 4220 44.75 Joan Young Private Vehicle Expense i, � III I I I �I I li I I I I Claims _.j. 93-08 Meeting 93-10 Date: May 12, 1993 REVISED MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT # Name Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4167 441.71 Acme & Sons Sanitation Sanitation Services 4168 97.91 Randy Anderson Reimbursement--Local Meeting Expense and Private Vehicle Expense 4169 11000.00 Geoff Ball & Associates Workshop Facilitator 4170 153.00 Bowers Publishing Inc. Subscription 4171 60.00 Mary Lou Buclmaster Enterprise Maintenance 4172 23.55 California Peace Officers' Resource Documents Association 4173 21.94 California Water Service Water Service 4174 60.25 Barrie D. Coate Arborist--Weeks Road 4175 66.02 Copymat Photocopier 4176 3,504.91 William Cotton & Associates,Inc. Consulting Services--Alpine Dam 4177 110.00 Alice Cummings Reimbursement--Work-shop Registration 4178 227.33 Design Concepts Production of Newsletter 4179 998.00 Flinn, Gray & Herterich Insurance 4180 10.84 Foster Bros.Securi.ty Systems,Inc. Keys 4181 33.07 Goodco Printing 4182 1,200.85 Hertz Equipment Rental Equipment Rental 4183 329.09 Independent Business Products Office Supplies 4184 416.34 Keeble & Shuchat Photographs and Equipment 4185 236.29 Konica Business Machines Maintenance Agreement 4186 37.50 Ligtelym Communications Radio Repairs 4187 200.00 Lopez Gardening Gardening Service 4188 164.73 Los Altos Garbage Company Dumpster Rental 4189 4,074.95 Merwin Mace Acquisition Consulting Service 4190 600.00 Magana's Building Maintenance Building Maintenance 4191 175.00 * Metro Park-. Conference Registration 4192 115.70 Minton's Lumber Company Field Supplies 4193 7,500.00 ** J. Moore Methods Public Opinion Survey ' 4194 7,500.00 J. Moore Methods Public Opinion Survey 4195 60.00 Mara Noelle Honorarium--Docent Training 4196 529.71 Northern Energy Tani: Delivery and Propane Fuel 4197 406.61 Office Depot Office Supplies 4298 196.68 Pacific Bell Telephone Service 4199 127.90 Loro Paterson Reimbursement--Uniform Expense 4200 82.07 Peninsula Blueprint, Inc. Maps and Bluelines 4201 11600.00 * Postage by Phone Postage 4202 67.30 Precision Engravers, Inc. Name Badges 4203 61.38 Patty Quillin Reimbursement--Printing ' 4204 43.65 Radio Shack Office Equipment 4205 500.00 Rails to Trails Conservancy Sponsorship of Conference 4206 8.51 Rancho Hardware Field Supplies 4207 1,348.58 Rich's Tire Service Vehicle Tires 4208 132.00 San Mateo Times Subsciption 4209 582.00 *** Sears Enterprise Repairs 4210 2,480.00 Eugene Sheehan Consulting Service and Equipment Rental 4211 26.22 Shell Oil Company Fuel * Urgent check issued on May 4, 1993. ** Urgent check issued on April 30, 1993. ***Urgent check issued on April 29, 1993. K Claims No. 93-08 Meeting 93-10 Date: May 12, 1993 REVISED MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL, OPEN SPACE DISTRICT # Name Description --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4212 87.45 Skyline County Water District Water Service 4213 54.12 Teater & Etc. District Map 4214 127.50 Therma Corporation Heating system Repair 4215 170.90 Unocal Fuel 4216 2,967.28 Valley Oil Canpany Fuel 4217 64.37 West Publishing Company Resource Documents 4218 76.91 NMI Services: Port-o-Let Sanitation Services 4219 228.52 The Warkingman's Emporium Uniform E.qpense 4220 44.75 Joan Young Private Vehicle Expense 4221 45.00 County Park and Recreation Legislative Conference Registration Director's Association 4222 78.29 Economy Business Machines Equipment Repair 4223 973.17 Fry's Electronics Office Equipment 4224 309.63 Petty Cash Local and Out-of-Town Meeting Expense, Computer and Office Supplies, Volunteer Recognition Supplies, Membership Dues and Private Vehicle Expense