HomeMy Public PortalAbout19940608 - Agendas Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 94-17 Open Space
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
Meeting 94-17
REGULAR MEETING -
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA*
7:30 P.M. 330 Distel Circle
Wednesday Los Altos, California
June 8, 1994
(7:30) ROLL CALL
** ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -- Public
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
*** ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR -- G. Babbitt
*** APPROVAL OF MINUTES
May 11, 1994 (Consent Item)
May 18, 1994 (Consent Item)
*** WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (Consent Item)
BOARD BUSINESS,
*** 1. Authorization for General Manager to Execute Photocopier Lease Agreement
with Lanier Worldwide Incorporated -- D. Dolan
***w 2. Lease of Excess 330 Distel Circle Office Space to Alzheimer's and Related
Diseases Association -- C. Britton
(7:45) 3. Consideration of Proposal to Change Start Time of District Board Meetings to
7:00 P.M. -- R. McKibbin
(7:55) 4. Amendment to Agreement with the City of Mountain View for Deer Hollow
Farm Including Assigning One District Maintenance Worker to the Farm and
Transferring $19,000 in Budget to Temporary Salaries Account -- J. Escobar
(8:05) 5. Tentative Adoption of a Comprehensive Plan for Public Use and District
Management of St. Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve -- S. Cochran
(8:50) 6. Adoption of Appendix A to District's Rules of Procedure Establishing
Procedures and Standard Forms for Closed Sessions -- S. Schectman
(9:00) INFORMATIONAL REPORTS -- Directors and Staff
*** REVISED CLAIMS (Consent Item)
CLOSED SESSION - None Scheduled
ADJOURNMENT
330 Distel Circle . Los Altos, California 94022-1404 ' Phone: 415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485 is
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
General Manager:L.Craig Britton
if
*NOTE. Times are estimated and items may appear earlier or later than listed. Agenda is
subject to change of order.
** TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: The Chair will invite public comment on agenda items at then time
each item is considered by the Board of Directors. You may address the Board concerning other
matters during oral communications. Each speaker will ordinarily be limited to 3 minutes.
Alternately, you may comment to the Board by a written communication, which the Board
appreciates.
***All items on the consent calendar shall be cpi2roved without discussion by one motion unless a
Board member removes an item from the consent calendar, or separate discussion. A member of the
public may request under oral communications that an item be removed from the consent calendar.
I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS
The Legislative, Finance, and Public Affairs Committee will meet on Thursday,
June 9, 1994 at 4:30 P.M. at the District office.
I
Open Space
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Wednesday, June 8, 1994 at 7 :30 p.m.
TOPIC: Review of the Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for the
St . Joseph' s Hill Open Space Preserve
BACKGROUND: This 267-acre preserve is located in the hills directly south
of the Town of Los Gatos . The main public access is through
Lexington Reservoir County Park to the south. Neighborhood
access is available at the north end of the preserve via Jones
Road through adjacent Novitiate Park. The preserve attracts
hikers, runners and mountain bicyclists .
PLANNING: The Open Space Management Planning Process provides for a two
step procedure in reviewing preserve use and management plans
to ensure that the public has the opportunity to provide
input . Upon review of this plan, tentative approval is
considered by the Board of Directors . Final adoption occurs
at a later date, allowing the public a minimum of two weeks to
submit additional comments .
The Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for St . Joseph' s
Hill Open Space Preserve was last reviewed in March, 1987 .
PLAN
HIGHLIGHTS: The plan includes recommendations for construction of two new
multi-use trails, realignment of 3 steep, rutted sections of
trail, and reopening of the historic Jones Trail alignment .
It also includes recommendations for restoration of the former
rifle range, abandoned vineyard area, and unofficial
"shortcut" trails .
The plan includes discussion and recommendations to allow
Caltrans to use a portion of the preserve as an oak woodland
restoration site to mitigate for the proposed Highway 17
interchange project at Bear Creek Road.
Copies of the plan are available at the District offices at
330 Distel Circle, Los Altos .
MEETING
LOCATION: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
Administrative Offices
330 Distel Circle
Los Altos
330 Distel Circle * Los Altos, California 94022-1404 - Phone: 415-691-1200 9 FAX: 415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Rohert M(Kibbin,Teena I lenshaw,Ginnv Babbitt, Nonette Hanko, Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
Open Space
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
SPECIAL MEETING
LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
AGENDA
4:30 P.M.
Thursday
June 9, 1994
(4:30) ROLL CALL
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -- Public
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
COMMITTEE BUSINESS
(4:35) 1. Discussion of policy regarding benches and plaques on open space
preserves
2. Request by the South Skyline Association for memorial plaque at
Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve honoring association members
3. Request by Harry Moore for memorial plaque at El Corte de Madera
Open Space Preserve honoring plane crash victims
4. Discussion of District name visibility on preserve entrance signs
5. Review draft of public opinion poll
6. Scheduling of next meeting and setting of next agenda
A. Encouraging formation of a Friends of Open Space committee
B. Public notification policies
C. Other items for the next agenda
(6:00) ADJOURNMENT
330 Distel Circle a Los Altos, California 94022-1404 * Phone: 415-691-1200 * FAX: 415-691-0485 E! °
Board ofOirectors:fete Siemens,Rohert McKihbin,ieena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko, Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
&Open Space
-----------------------—
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
Meeting 94-13
REGULAR MEETING
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
May 11, 1994
MINUTES
I. ROLL CALL
President Ginny Babbitt called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Ginny Babbitt, Pete Siemens, Robert McKibbin, Betsy Crowder, Teena
Henshaw, Nonette Hanko, and Wim de Wit.
Personnel Present L. Craig Britton, Jean Fiddes, Malcolm Smith, John Escobar, Randy
Anderson, Mary Gundert, Carleen Bruins, and Susan Dale.
H. ORAL COMMUNICATION
There were no oral communications.
III. SPECIAL ORDER OF THE DAY
Motion: N. Hanko moved that the Board adopt Resolution 94-18, a Resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Supporting the Santa
Clara County Open Space Authority and Measure A on the June 1994 Ballot. R.
McKibbin seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0.
IV. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Motion: B. Crowder moved that the Board adopt the agenda. P. Siemens seconded the
motion. The motion passed 7 to 0.
V. ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion: B. Crowder moved that the Board adopt the consent calendar including approval of
minutes of April 13 and April 27, 1994, responses to written communication from
Carol Olson, Los Altos Hills; Robert and Jane Duric, Mountain View; and Sarah
Benedetti, Sunnyvale, and revised claims 94-09. R. McKibbin seconded the motion.
The motion passed 7 to 0.
VI. BOARD BUSINESS
A. AMintment of Susan M. Schectman as District Legal Counsel and Approval of Retainer
Agreement for Legal Services M=rt R-94.-M
Motion: B. Crowder moved that the Board approve the Retainer Agreement for Legal
Services appointing Susan M. Schectman as District's Legal Counsel. P.
Siemens seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0.
330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 • Phone: 415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485 S
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert M(Kibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
General Manager:L.Craig Britton
Meeting 94-11 Page 2
B. Brown Act Briefing (Report R-94-57)
S. Schectman presented the Board with a briefing describing a number of the most
significant legislative changes to the Ralph M. Brown Act. She gave several examples,
definitions, and guidelines of pertinent areas for items such as definition of legislative body,
conflict of interests, what constitutes a meeting, the public's rights, closed session, and
committee obligations.
S. Schectman stated that she would return to the Board with a follow-up report on
implementation of the Brown Act including standard forms for use in holding closed
sessions.
VIE. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
President Ginny Babbitt acknowledged the arrival of a member of the public and learning that he
would like to address the Board, she re-opened oral communications. Gene Gutt, 1013 Russell
Avenue, Los Altos 94022, commented he was a frequent bicycle rider at Fremont Older Open
Space Preserve and wanted to report on confrontations he has experienced with hikers and
equestrians. He volunteered to work with the District in solving problems in this area.
Vin. BOARD BUSINESS (Continued)
C. Adoption of a Conceptual Exhibit Plan and Q2Lra_t_iQn_aI Alternatives for the David C.
Daniels Nature Center at Skyline Ridge Q n Space Preserve and Application for an
Environmental Education Grant for Implementation of Phase I of the Exhibit Plan (Rog
R-94-59)
M. Gundert detailed the process used to establish plans for Daniels Nature Center. She
described and presented the phased plans which would first entail bringing utilities (electric
and telephone) to the center, expanding the deck around to the back of the building, and
installing a burglar alarm and shading covers at an estimated cost of$24,000. She said
funding for these utilities and support system improvements had been included in the 1994-
1995 budget. She said Phase I would include hands-on educational exhibits, creating an
interesting functional center and would cost between $43,000 to $51,000. Phase III and HI
would include trail side exhibits, animal life cycle workstations inside the center and a
video camera for underwater video. Phase 11 would cost $35,000 to $47,000 and Phase III
would cost $42,000 to $51,000 and an additional $6,000 to $10,000 for supplies and
materials. She said that the total for all phases is $127,000 to $160,000.
Directors Henshaw, Siemens, and McKibbin expressed support for the educational concept
of the nature center. Dr. David Daniels, father of David C. Daniels, offered the District
future support as the District neared Phase H of the project. M. Gundert reported on the
opportunity to apply for an Environmental Education Grant Program to develop some of the
site facilities, with monies coming from the personalized license plate fund.
T. Henshaw commented in support of the center's usefulness to school children. W. de
Wit, though supportive of the center, and B. Crowder stated their concerns with the costs
for the center.
Discussion focused on funding for the project. C. Britton noted that staff would seek a
$15,000 state grant for Phase I development and noted that upon award of the grant or the
Meeting 94-11 Page
securing of other revenue sources, staff would return to the Board with a funding plan and
request authorization to proceed with construction of Phase I improvements. He said that
staff had set a goal that 50% or approximately $25,000 of the funding for Phase I should
come from outside sources.
Discussion also focused on providing some type of self-guided trail or exterior wall
informational displays that visitors could enjoy, even if the center were closed.
Motion: N. Hanko moved that the Board accept and approve the Conceptual Exhibit
Plan and Operational Alternatives for the David C. Daniels Nature Center;
authorize staff to proceed with development of utilities and support system
improvements for the Nature Center at the estimated cost of$24,000; adopt
Resolution 94-19 a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula.
Regional Open Space District authorizing submittal of an application for the
Environmental Education Grant Program for implementation of Phase I of the
exhibit plan for the Nature Center; and authorize staff to proceed with design
of the Phase I improvements to the Nature Center in anticipation of receiving
Environmental Education Grant Program funds and/or other outside funding.
T. Henshaw seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0.
President G. Babbitt called a recess at 9:27 P.M. and reconvened the meeting at 9:40 P.M.
D. Proerarn Evaluation for the 1993-1994 Action Plan for Implementation of the Basic Policy
of the Mi Ldgeninsula Regional Open Space District (Report R-94-55)
General Manager C. Britton and program managers R. Anderson, J. Escobar, M. Smith,
and J. Fiddes highlighted progress during the 1993-1994 year. B. Crowder requested that
this progress report include an annual summary of acreage acquired.
Motion: R. McKibbin moved that the Board accept staff s program evaluation report.
P. Siemens seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0.
E. AWgintment of District Representative to Serve as Non-Voting Member of Santa Cruz
County's Local Agency Commission's S=ial District Advisory Committee (Report R-94-
5
Motion: B. Crowder moved that P. Siemens serve as the District's representative to the
Local Agency Formation Commission Special District Advisory Committee in
Santa Cruz County. N. Hanko seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to
0.
V11. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS
C. Britton reported that Mr. and Mrs. Mort Levine had extended an invitation to brunch for
Board members that included a tour of the Fremont Older house. C. Britton distributed District
pens to each Board member. He announced a communication sub-lease offer from Cellular One
at Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve. C. Britton reported the trail on the former Deka
property at Long Ridge Open Space Preserve is now open to hikers and equestrians only.
*Meeting 94-11 Page 4
C. Britton reported the Trail Center's tenth anniversary celebration will be on June 18 at
Rengstorff Park. He said the Special District's Forum will be held in Vancouver on June 13-18
and asked if any Board members were interested in attending; R. McKibbin expressed his interest
in attending. C. Britton reported that he had learned from Ralph Heim in Sacramento about the
$500 million shortfall from monies to be received from the special districts augmentation fund.
C. Britton reported that Proposition 180 is positioned last on the voter ballot.
B. Crowder reported on the South Skyline Association's 25th anniversary event at Fogerty
Winery and the Kings Mountain Association annual dinner. B. Crowder said that the Mayor of
Portola Valley had sent her material concerning the District's agreement to undergrounding
utilities as part of the Windy Hill Open Space Preserve parking lot project.
R. McKibbin requested a list of VIP Tour attendees Saturday, May 14, which were distributed by
M. Smith later in the evening.
G. Babbitt reported she and her nephew participated in the city of Mountain View's parade. She
reported that past volunteer Paul Josse is having an art show at Santa Clara Library at Holmstead
through the month of May.
P. Siemens reported he attended some sessions at a personnel conference on the legal
ramifications of the information super highway.
G. Babbitt reported that she and J. Escobar will be touring the buildings at Mt. Umunhum on
Thursday, May 26.
J. Escobar reported on two accidents at Fremont Older Open Space Preserve and at Sierra Azul
Open Space Preserve. J. Escobar encouraged Board members to let staff know if they would be
attending the volunteer recognition event.
R. Anderson reported the District had been recommended for funding for a Mitigation
Enhancement Grant for Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve, but noted that actual award of the
grant would depend on the amount of funding available. R. Anderson reported that the Dog
Program Task Force has completed its research and will meet in July.
M. Smith distributed itineraries for the Saturday, May 14, tour of District lands for Santa Clara
County public officials.
VIII. CLOSED SESSION
The Board recessed to closed session at 10:37 P.M. to discuss:
A. Conference with Real PLQWM Negotiator (Government Code Section 54956.8)
Real Property: San Mateo County Assessor's parcels 076-350-150 & -240
Negotiating Parties: Corte Madera, a California Limited Partnership (Ted Walker and
Andrew Schilling)
Under Negotiations: Instructions to negotiator concerned price and terms of payment.
Meeting 94-11 Page 5
B. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Government Code Section 5495
Title: General Manager
IX. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 11:21 P.M.
Susan Dale
Recording Secretary
I
I,
l
Claims No. 94--09
Meeting 94-13
Date: May 11, 1994
REVISED
MIOPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
Amount Name Description
5814 375.00 Aaron's Septic Service Sanitation Services
5815 220.84 Acme&Sons Sanitation Sanitation Services
5816 2,504.73 AOT Security Systems Security System Installation
5817 87.50 Randy Anderson Private Vehicle Expense
5818 458.00 Arcturus Land Surveying Surveying
5819 7,724.65 AT&T Telephone Installation-Ranger Yard
5820 399.03 Binkley Associates Consulting Engineers
5821 44.75 Black Mountain Spring Water Water Service
5822 375.75 California Journal Seminar Registration-P. Siemens
M. Smith and C. Britton
5823 7.51 California Trail Days Trail Day Supplies
5824 63.52 California Water Service Company Water Service
5825 78.29 Clark's Auto Pans/Machine Shop Vehicle Pans
5826 195.11 Sheryl Cochran Private Vehicle
5827 78.80 Annette Coleman Reimbursement-Field Supplies
5828 31.39 Communications Research Radio Repairs
51329 32-73 Patrick Congdon Reimbursement-Field Supplies
5830 70.00 Toni Coreili Docent Training
5831 25.00 Mabel Crittendon Docent Training
55832 3,250.00 Cana Property Analysis Appraisal Services
5833 730.69 Design Concepts Brochure Materials and Printing
5834 3,692.00 Employment Development Department Unemployment Insurance Tax
5335 357.22 Farrelle Communications Radio
5836 177.00 Federal Parks and Recreation Subscription
5837 28.90 Film to Frame Photo Processing
=408 219.29 David B. Fisher Legal Services
5839 33.94 Foster Bros.Security Systems Keys and Locks
5840 162-36 Fry's Electronics Computer Equipment
5841 90.87 Gardenland Power Equipment Field Supplies
5842 65.52 Leroy M. Gimbal,Jr. Batt" Reimbursement
58Q 193.29 Goodco Press Printing
5844 180.00 Gould Architects Professional Services
5845 108.02 Mary Gundert Private Vehicle Expense
5846 400.00 Brett Hanson Bicycle Patrol Skills Training
5847 125.97 Hengehold Motor Company, Inc. Van Rental
5848 898.05 Interstate Traffic Control Signs
5849 90.13 Keeble&Shuchat Photography Film Processing, Slides and Prints
5850 504.19 Konica Business Machines Maintenance Agreement
5851 41.50 Judy Law Reimbursement-Aerial Photograph
5852 110,34 Lexington Quarry Base Rock
5853 65.00 Los Altos Camera Equipment Repair
5854 1,535.42 Los Altos Garbage Company Dumpter Rental
5855 3,313.82 Bucky Mace Consulting Services
5856 223.00 McGrath RentCorp Skyline Ranger Office Rental
5357 375.85 Minton's Lumber&Supply Field Supplies
5858 51.96 Moffett Supply Company Office Supplies
5859 47.60 Monogram Sanitation Sanitation Services
5860 3939 Mountain View Garden Center Concrete Mix
5861 45.00 Linda Murdoch Docent Training
5862 45.00 Roger Myers Docent Training
5863 121.13 Nasco Field Supplies
Claims No. b _j
Meeting 94-13
Date: May11. 1894
REVISED
W1|DPEN|NSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
# Amount Name Description
5864 275.19 Noble Ford Tractor, Inc. Equipment Parts
5865 75.00 Northern Energy Propane Fuel
5866 592.40 Pacific Bell Telephone Service
5867 180.08 Palo Alto Chamber Orchestra Music-Volunteer Recognition Event
5868 72.57 Peninsula Blueprint B|ua|imea �
5869 798.83 Pine Cone Lumber Company, Inc. Fence Posts
5870 54893 PIP Printing Printing
5871 350.00 Town ofPorto|mValley Retainer
5872 20.74 Precision Engravers, Inc. Brass Name Badges
5873 42876 Quiok8iherPhm¢ing Printing-Business Cards
5874 72.63 PauyOuiUin Reimbursement-Printing
� 5875 133.89 Reynolds, Roux, Price&Caoam Legal Services
� 5876 481.28 Rhue Ridge Homeowners Association Garbage, Road Maintenance and
Insurance Fees
� 5877 56.95 Rich's Tire Service Tire Repair
5878 3.746.28 Roy's Repair Service Vehicle Maintenance and Repairs
5879 133.80 S&VV Equipment Company Equipment Repairs
5880 60.00 Sacramento Area Chapter-American Resource Material
Red Cross
5881 85.00 SofetyN]een Solvent Service
5882 222.85 Sandis Humber Jones Engineering Services
� 5883 1.765.12 Santa Clara County Shmxffu Patrol Service '
� Department
� 5884 1.360.00 E. R.Sheehan Trail Construction and Layout
� 5885 243.85 Shell Oil Company Fuel
5888 174.00 Skyline County Water District Water Service
5887 671.89 Smith Equipment Equipment Parts and Repairs
5888 558.61 Malcolm Smith Reimbursement-Conference Expense
and Private Vehicle Expense
5889 25.00 RonSuonz Docent Training
5890 3.25 Summit Uniforms Uniform Expense
5891 335.08 ThenneCorpomtion Heating and Air Conditioning
Maintenance
5892 130.48 TuftnutVVorha Field Supplies
5893 14.14 University Art Center Drafting Supplies
5884 46.63 Unocal Fuel
5895 1.533.33 Valley Oil Company Fuel
5896 251.61 Value Business Products Office Furnishings
5897 1.012.50 Beth wNofnhs/CuastAssociates Consulting Services
5888 24.00 WordPerfect Magazine Subscription
5899 54.55 Woodside Union Fuel
5900 434.56 Yardbird Equipment Sales Equipment and Supplies
5901 11.00 ° Secretary ofState Audit Filing Fee
5902 409.39 Petty Cash Resource Documents, Film and
Developing, Local and Out-uf-Timvn
Meeting Expenses, Field and Office
Expense, and Volunteer Expenses
*Urgent check issued onMay 10. 1394
Open Space
1 i
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
Meeting 94-15
SPECIAL MEETING
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
May 18, 1994
MINUTES
I. ROLL CALL
President Ginny Babbitt called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Pete Siemens, Nonette Hanko, Wim de Wit, Robert McKibbin, Ginny
Babbitt, and Betsy Crowder.
Member Absent: Teena Henshaw.
Staff Present: Craig Britton, Jean Fiddes, Randy Anderson, John Escobar, Malcolm Smith,
Sue Schectman, Bucky Mace, Carleen Bruins, Diane Blackman, Julie McCullough, and
Emma Johnson. j
II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
There were no oral communications.
III. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Motion: N. Hanko moved that the Board adopt the agenda. P. Siemens seconded the
motion. The motion passed 6 to 0.
IV. BOARD BUSINESS
Open Space Preservation Methods Workshop fReport R-94-6Oj
G. Babbitt thanked the participants for attending, noting they are all partners in open space
preservation and that the District appreciates their input. C. Britton said that the workshop's
purpose was to examine open space preservation methods and discuss the most appropriate
techniques for the District to pursue in completing the greenbelt, especially with tight budget
constraints. He said the information accumulated would be the foundation for a future
meeting with the Board of Directors of Peninsula Open Space Trust. He noted that a report
of the workshop's proceedings would be sent to persons who desired it. He introduced Geoff
Ball who facilitated the workshop.
The participants met in small groups to discuss the pros and cons of the various open space
preservation methods contained in the attachment to the report R-94-60. The entire group
then rated the different approaches on a spectrum of 1 to 100 .
330 Distel Circle - Los Altos, California 94022-1404 - Phone:415-691-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485 �
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Tee na Hens haw,Ginny Babbitt, Nonette Hanko, Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit -
I
Meeting 94-15 Page 2
FEE (essentially is ownership of the land -- includes fee title, defeasible fee. life estate co-
tenancy, corporate shares, and sale and leaseback)
Pros:
Easily understood; widest scope to use and act; provides long-term planning opportunities for
capital improvement; asset that can be sold, leased, charge fees; may be dedicated as open
space; full ability to preserve natural assets and allow use; life tenant has good security and
eventual ownership; easily transferable; most controllable; allows public access to generate
public support; co-tenancy has potential.
Cons:
Most expensive to acquire; full burden of liability and maintenance; leads to high expectation
of use and management/costs; may be cheapest in the long-run; land may not be available in
fee; use may not require the fee/may not be necessary to own to achieve goals; life estate
tenants may live a long time.
The group then voted on fee title approach to land preservation:
Relative Cost (in comparison with other methods)
High - 100 Medium - 5 Low - 0
Stewardship (control over assets of the property)
High - 100 Medium - 0 Low - 0
Length of Time (length of time of control over property)
Permanent - 96 Middle - 3 Temporary - 5
Sales/Negotiation Difficulty (complex or simple issue explaining to landowner/length of
time/number of advisors)
Easy Complex - 5 Middle - 15
P y - 83
Use in ftn Space Land Preservation (prevalence in preservi
ng open space)
Often - 98 Sometimes - 2 Seldom - 0
Public Acceptance (public's attitude toward method vs. other methods)
High - 57 Medium - 43 Low - 2
Use by Others (frequency of use)
Public Often - 75 Sometimes - 20 Seldom - 2
Private Often - 44 Sometimes - 44 Seldom - 2
Use by MROSD (would like to see District use this method)
Often - 57 Sometimes - 35 Seldom - 0
EASEMENT (right to do something on someone else's land [positive easement]; giving up
of a right by or privilege of a landowner jnegative easementl -- includes trail easements
agricultural easement, open space easement, conservation easement and development rights
acquisition)
Pros:
Less expensive; allows land to be kept in natural state; allows focus on specific resource; can
be tailored to specific management goals; less liability; economic benefit to seller without
natural or development loss; limited maintenance, management, and operations costs; good
tool for reluctant seller; may be more willing sellers; keeps property on tax rolls; permanent
Meeting 94-15 Page 3
right; continuing relationship with owner; limit or restrict public use; more acceptable to
private property rights advocates; more tax advantages for owner; support continuation of
desirable private land uses; can dedicate permanently.
Cans:
Overall costs vs. rights are high; don't have full control; management enforcement may be
difficult; can be complicated to negotiate; some risk of liability; limited or no public access;
don't have an asset to sell, lease, or charge fees; can be expensive; possible enforcement
costs; can lose some property tax base; if violation only remedy is money - lose resource;
not as well known as fee title; limited or no flexibility; can be asset that might be traded or
sold back to owner; maybe too much flexibility with easement; no ability to restore habitat. l
The group rated by vote trail easements approach to land preservation:
Relative Cost (in comparison with other methods)
High - 14 Medium - 38 Low - 42
Stew_ardshiv (ability to monitor and preserve natural features)
High - 6 Medium - 16 Low - 75
Length of Time (length of time of control over property)
Permanent - 52 Middle - 35 Temporary - 2
Sales/Negotiation Difficulty (complex or simple issue explaining to landowner/length of
time/nu
mber of advisors)
Complex -ex 43 Mid
dle ddle -
4$
. Easy - 7
Y
Use in n S ace Land Preservation (prevalence
O� p (p epee in preserving open space)
Often - 11 Sometimes - 28 Seldom -
53
Public Acceptance (public's attitude toward method vs. other methods)
Hi h - 3 3
g Medium - 43 Low - 16
Us
e b Others
e s (fr
equency of use
)
Public Often - 23 Sometimes - 48 Seldom - 21
Private Often - 9 Sometimes - 35
Seldom - 48
Use b MR D OS would like y ( e to see District use this method
f O ten - 36
Some
times -
50 Seldom - 11
The group then rated agricultural, open space, and conservation easement approach to land
acquisition:
Relative Cost (in comparison with other methods)
High - 33 Medium - 66 Low - 8
Stewardship (control over assets of the property)
High - 22 Medium - 63 Low - 28
Length of Time (length of time of control over property)
Permanent - 52 Middle - 39 Temporary - 5
Sales/Negotiation Difficulty (complex or simple issue explaining to landowner/length of
time/number of advisors)
Complex - 52 Middle - 31 Easy - 2
Use in Open Space Land Preservation (prevalence in preserving open space)
Often - 39 Sometimes - 42 Seldom - 7
Meeting 94-15 Page 4
Public Acceptance (public's attitude toward method vs. other methods)
High - 33 Medium - 44 Low - 7
Use by Others (frequency of use)
Public Often - 8 Sometimes - 47 Seldom - 25
Private Often - 23 Sometimes - 44 Seldom - 11
Use by MROSD (would like to see District use this method)
Often - 36 Sometimes - 34 Seldom - 11
The group rated development rights acquisition approach to land preservation:
Relative Cost (in comparison with other methods)
High - 51 Medium - 39 Low - 2
Stewardship (control over assets of the property)
High - 12 Medium - 27 Low - 54
Length of Time (length of time of control over property)
Permanent - 50 Middle- 25 Temporary - 18
Sales/Negotiation Difficulty (complex or simple issue explaining to landowner/length of
time/number of advisors)
Complex - 64 Middle - 28 Easy - 5
Use in Open Space Land Preservation (prevalence in preserving open space)
Often - 4 Sometimes - 23 Seldom - 71
Public Acceptance (public's attitude toward method vs. other methods)
High - 17 Medium - 42 Low - 43
Use by Others (frequency of use)
Public Often - 5 Sometimes - 16 Seldom - 83
Private Often - 0 Sometimes - 29 Seldom - 70
Use by MROSD (would like to see District use this method)
Often - 15 Sometimes - 22 Seldom - 60
OPTIONS Includes option to purchase terms specified in option contract and optionee has
option to buy or not buy), lease with purchase option (contract for lease with an option for
purchase which contains essential purchase terms), right of first refusal (requires landowner
considering purchase offer to give holder right of first refusal to match terms of offerl
Pros:
Buys time fixes rice when cant purchase immediate) • revokable; k agencies'P P
s a e c es funds
Y Y � �P g
more fluid; may negate effects of inflation; no management expense; encourages public
interest in public acquisition; good tool if trying to assemble contiguous properties; with
lease may gain control of resources during option period; owners may like security of having
a willing buyer; facilitates seller's tax planning; no liability.
ConM
May not be able to purchase and therefore lose option funds; may not have control;
complexity issues; may create false expectation in public; subject to market forces both pro
and con; right of first refusal can expose agency to unscrupulous dealings; no public access
or limited public access; no direct public benefit; hard to renegotiate; owners may be
Meeting 94-15 Page 5
reluctant because of encumbrances (right of first refusal) and putting off potential buyers.
The group rated options to purchase and lease with purchase options approach to land
preservation:
Relative Cost (in comparison with other methods)
High - 0 Medium - 12 Low - 96
Stewardship (control over assets of the property)
High - 0 Medium - 2 Low - 98
Length of Time (length of time of control over property)
Permanent - 0 Middle - 0 Temporary - 100
Sales/Negotiation Difficulty (complex or simple issue explaining to landowner/length of
time/number of advisors)
Complex - 18 Middle - 73 Easy - 18
Use in Open Space Land Preservation (prevalence in preserving open space)
Often - 21 Sometimes - 70 Seldom - 7
Public Acceptance (public's attitude toward method vs. other methods)
High - 16 Medium - 67 Low - 16
Use by Others (frequency of use)
Public Often - 24 Sometimes - 52 Seldom - 22
Private Often - 32 Sometimes - 64 Seldom - 2
Use by MROSD (would like to see District use this method)
Often - 24 Sometimes - 71 Seldom - 16
Right of first refusal was then rated by the group.
i
Relative Cost (in comparison with other methods)
High - 5 Medium - 13 Low - 77
Stewardship (control over assets of the property)
High - 2 Medium - 2 Low - 98
Length of Time (length of time of control over property)
Permanent - 4 Middle - 4 Temporary - 96
Sales/Negotiation Difficulty (complex or simple issue explaining to landowner/length of
time/number of advisors)
Complex - 19 Middle - 45 Easy - 42
Use in Open Space Land Preservation (prevalence in preserving open space)
Often - 0 Sometimes - 25 Seldom - 75
Public Acceptance (public's attitude toward method vs. other methods)
High - 0 Medium - 29 Low - 76
Use by Others (frequency of use)
Public Often - 0 Sometimes - 24 Seldom - 80
Private Often - 2 Sometimes - 30 Seldom - 70
Use by MROSD (would like to see District use this method
Often - 2 Sometimes - 32 Seldom - 68
I
Meeting 94-15 Page 6
RESERVATION OF RIGHTS - includes focused resale (resale of a portion of purchased
lands with restrictions to limit and control future use). purchase resale (entire fee interest is
purchased and then sold with restrictions on future use and development), partial
development acquiring entity participates in developing a portion of the property),joint
venture development association of persons jointly undertaking a single commercial
enterprise for profit), and land exchange (exchange of lands making it practical for each
party to have land best suited to their needs).
Pros:
Flexibility in purchasing and financing; lower cost of acquisition or protection; potential to
allow public access to both areas of parcel (private and public); could be used to overcome
reluctant seller's concerns; opportunity to liquidate or convert assets without giving up all
rights; permits greater participation with other non-profits and agencies; may carry lower
obligation for management; can control kind of development; may maintain property tax
base; allows for trades into higher priority properties; provides opportunities for funding for
on-going maintenance.
Cons:
May be contrary to organization's goals; liability may be high especially in conjunction with
development; possible slow return of money to agency; poor public perception of process;
lack of flexibility in maintaining recreational goals; loss of part of reserves; subject to market
conditions; potential disputes with private partner; typically complex; disputes with potential
neighbors high probability; risky.
The group rated focused resale, purchase resale, partial development, and joint venture
development.
Relative Cost (in comparison with other methods)
Nigh - 20 Medium - 59 Low - 10
Stewardship (control over assets of the Pe Y ro rt )
P
High - 10 Medium - 55 Low - 28
Length of Time (length of time of control over property)
Permanent - 20 Middle - 60 Temporary - 10
Sales/Negotiation Difficulty (complex or simple issue explaining to landowner/length of
time/number of advisors)
Complex - 90 Middle - 5 Easy - 0
Use in Open Space Land Preservation (prevalence in preserving open space)
Often - 0 Sometimes - 22 Seldom - 76
Public Acceptance (public's attitude toward method vs. other methods)
High - 0 Medium - 20 Low - 80
Use by Others (frequency of use)
Public Often - 0 Sometimes - 10 Seldom - 84
Private Often - 7 Sometimes - 52 Seldom - 40
Use by MROSD (would like to see District use this method)
Often - 2 Sometimes - 36 Seldom - 61
I
I
I
Meeting 94-15 Page 7
The group then rated land exchange.
Relative Cost (in comparison with other methods)
High - 5 Medium - 22 Low - 71
Stewardship (control over assets of the property)
High - 15 Medium - 47 Low - 25
Length of Time (length of time of control over property)
Permanent - 73 Middle - 15 Temporary - 2
Sales/Negotiation Difficulty (complex or simple issue explaining to landowner/length of
time/number of advisors)
Complex - 48 Middle - 32 Easy - 12
Use in Open Space Land Preservation (prevalence in preserving open space)
Often - 10 Sometimes - 50 Seldom - 40
Public Acceptance (public's attitude toward method vs. other methods)
High - 30 Medium - 45 Low - 17
Use by Others (frequency of use)
Public Often - 0 Sometimes - 30 Seldom - 68
Private Often - 2 Sometimes - 57 Seldom - 30
Use by MROSD (would like to see District use this method)
Often - 2 Sometimes - 42 Seldom - 56
MISCELLANEOUS - includes land trust facilitation (referral of a land owner to a land trust
may result in ultimate acquisition to best advantage of all involved parties), tax sale when
property owner fails to pay taxes. a five year period begins in which owner must redeem
property or lose title. If taxes, costs and penalties are not paid within five years, the
roe is Offered to certain public agencies before an auction eminent domain (exercise f 1) p rty p �; �, � C se O
the right of government to force sale of property for public use), foreclosure (enforcement of
a lien by sale ofpropeM given as security. The foreclosed prQMM can sometimes be
obtained for below market value) bankruptcy (public agency acquisition can often offer cash
that is not available in the private sector to a landowner in bankruptcy), transfer of
development rights grantee gains right of development given up by the grantor, TDRs can
be sold or exchanged for other property or property rights), development dedication
(dedication of public amenities such as trail rights or open mace easement required of a
property owner as a condition of development), mitigation brokering (adverse environmental
consequences of development often require mitigation measures which a local agency can
participate in by guiding to appropriate land acquisition or habitat restoration), creative
financing (unusual but mutually beneficial financing arrangements), and planning policies
(policies established by cities and counties having significant effect on patterns and degrees of
development).
The ratings on level of use by MROSD participants would like to see in each of the
following miscellaneous categories were:
Land Trust Facilitation
Often - 72 Sometimes - 23 Seldom - 5
Tax Sale
Often - 77 Sometimes - 10 Seldom - 5
Eminent Domain
i
Meeting 94-15 Page 8
Often - 5 Sometimes - 26 Seldom - 64
Foreclosure
Often - 56 Sometimes - 26 Seldom - 10
Bankruptcy
Often - 45 Sometimes - 42 Seldom - 5
Transfer of Development Rights
Often - 27 Sometimes - 33 Seldom - 33
Development Dedication
Often - 50 Sometimes - 42 Seldom - 5
Mitigation Brokering
Often - 66 Sometimes - 26 Seldom - 10
Creative financing
Often - 57 Sometimes - 30 Seldom - 12
Planning Policies
Often - 52 Sometimes - 27 Seldom - 7
i
G. Babbitt and C. Britton thanked everyone for attending and participating.
V. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 P.M.
Emma Johnson
Recording Secretary
j
i
.............
i
I
Open Space
R-94-72
Meeting 94-17 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
June 8, 1994
AGENDA ITEM
Authorization to Enter Into Photocopier Lease Agreement
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the general manager to execute a photocopier lease agreement with Lanier Worldwide,
Incorporated.
DISCUSSION
In July 1989, the District purchased a Konica 7090 copy machine for $20,700. The annual
service and supply agreement, which is based on copy volume, has averaged over $5,000 per
year. During the past year, the performance of the Konica copy machine has declined to such
an extent that it is no longer adequately meeting District needs. The machine is requiring more
and more maintenance resulting in frustrating downtime for the staff, and District usage of
outside copying vendors is increasing. Konica representatives have advised staff that the
machine cannot be adequately repaired and should be replaced.
Staff has completed research on the lease or purchase of a new copy machine for the main
office. Based on an analysis of cost, features, service, and reliability, the Lanier 6765 copy
machine best meets the District's needs. It performed very well during a week-long trial period
in the administration office, and several companies provided excellent references for Lanier.
Reliability, service, and ease of operation were cited as the most outstanding features of the
Lanier 6765 copier.
The 1994-1995 budget includes $30,000 for the purchase of a new photocopier. During the
budget review process, staff agreed to return to the Board before taking action on replacing the
current copier. At this time, leasing the machine for a 60-month period appears to be the most
prudent option. Advantages to leasing include a total satisfaction or replacement guarantee for
five years (compared to three years if purchased); a fixed service agreement price for five years
(compared to one if purchased); the option to add the service agreement interest free to the
lease; and the option to upgrade the copier (or downgrade) at any time during the 60-month
lease. Given that the average life for optimum performance of a copy machine is five years, and
that copy machine technology will have improved significantly within five years, the option to
upgrade at any time or get a new machine at the end of the five year lease provides a strong
incentive for leasing rather than purchasing a new copy machine.
The cost of leasing a Lanier 6765 copy machine for a 60-month term is $655.75 per month,
which includes full service (all parts, labor, drum, developer, and unlimited service calls) and
allows 75,000 copies per quarter. A down payment of two lease payments ($1,311.50) is
330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 • Phone: 415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
R-94-72 Page two
required to order the equipment. Additional charges for excess copy volume and toner are
estimated to be$127.50 per month, for a total estimated monthly expense of$783.25, or$9,399
per year-
Prepared by:
Deirdre Dolan, Administrative Analyst
Contact person:
Jean Fiddes, Administrative Services Manager
i
I
Open Space
---------------------------
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
R-94-71
Meeting 94-17
June 8, 1994
AGENDA ITEM
Lease of Excess Office Space, 330 Distel Circle, Los Al
,1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the General Manager to execute a Lease on behalf of the District with the
Alzheimer's and Related Diseases Association for the excess office space located at 330
Distel Circle upon approval of District's Legal Counsel.
DISCUSSION
The District currently has three tenants occupying a portion of the headquarters building not
used by the District. All of these tenants are currently on month to month leases. Approxi-
mately 65% of the usable space is presently occupied.
i
The District entered into a listing agreement with Tom Fisher, a local broker, who has been
searching for a tenant on the District's behalf for the last year. He has been asked to try to
find potential tenants who will be compatible neighbors and secure tenants for a moderate to
long term.
The Alzheimer's and Related Diseases Association clearly meets the District's criteria and
they have tentatively agreed to lease the entire space for a minimum of five years.
The essential terms of the proposed lease are as follows:
• The entire unused portion of the building consisting of approximately 3,500 square
feet will be leased.
• The term of the lease will be five (5) years with an option to extend the term for an
additional five years. Rent for the option period will be subject to renegotiation prior
to the end of the initial term.
• The date of the occupancy will begin on August 1, 1994. Rent will commence on
September 1, 1994 which will allow the tenant a thirty day rent-free term during
' which they will perform a number of tenant improvements to the space.
• All tenant improvement costs will be absorbed by the tenant. Plans and specifications
for improvements will be reviewed and approved by District staff prior to commence-
ment of construction. Tenant improvements will be constructed by licensed contrac-
tors. All improvements will become the District's property upon construction.
330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 9402 2-1 404 • Phone:415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
R-94-71 Page two
The District will, at its expense, provide landscaping and lighting consistent with the
remainder of the building, adjacent to the entrance to the leased space. It is estimated
that this will cost less than $5,000; however, much of the work may be accomplished
by District personnel.
• Rent will commence at $1.25 per square foot per month for the first year, which
totals $4,375 per month. There will be an annual rent increase of 4%. The tenant
will be responsible for any and all increases in the District's operating expenses that
result from the tenant's use of the leased space. Operating expense increases will be
determined by comparison to costs during the first twelve (12) months of occupancy.
• The tenant will use the leased space solely for administrative offices and occasional
meetings of small groups who support persons suffering Alzheimer's or related
diseases.
• Any and all signs installed or constructed by the proposed tenant will be in accor-
dance with applicable codes. Size, location and design of signs will also be subject to
District approval.
• Tom Fisher representing the District and Ron Labetitch representing the Association
will split the brokerage commission specified in the listing agreement, which totals
$3,841.95.
This lease will increase District's rental revenue b approximately 1 000 r month. It will
$
Y PP Y � per
enhance the space with desirable tenant improvements. It will also provide the District with
P P
I
a secure and compatible tenant for at least five years.
Prepared by:
L. Craig Britton, General Manager
Terrance Dunning, Real Property Representative
Contact person:
Terrance Dunning
Open Space
1
1
R-94-66 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
Meeting 94-17
June 8, 1994
AGENDA ITEM
Consideration of Proposal to Change Start Time of:Distric Board Meetings to 7:00 P.M.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Direct staff to return at your June 22 regular meeting with a resolution amending your Rules
of Procedure if you decide to change the start time of District Board meetings from 7:30
P.M. to 7:00 P.M.
DISCUSSION
Director McKibbin requested that a proposal to change the start time of District Board
meetings from 7:30 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. be placed on your agenda for Board discussion.
Prepared by:
Jean Fiddes, District Clerk
Contact person:
L. Craig Britton, General Manager
330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022-1404 • Phone:415-691-1200 FAX:415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
Open Space
--------------------
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
R-94-67
Meeting 94-17
June 8, 1994
AGENDA ITEM
Amendment to the Agreement with the City of Mountain iew or Deer Hollow Farm
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
I. Authorize the general manager to execute the attached third amendment to the agreement with
the City of Mountain View, which will provide one District maintenance worker to assist with
the operation of Deer Hollow Farm for one year, beginning July 1, 1994.
2. Amend the District's fiscal year 1994-1995 budget to include an additional $19,000 in temporary
salaries to offset the impact of the subject agreement on the District's regular maintenance
activities.
3. Direct staff to work with the City of Mountain View, the County of Santa Clara, and other
interested organizations to develop a long-term strategy for future operation of the farm.
BACKGROUND
Last summer, in response to several years of serious financial constraints, the Mountain View City
Council directed its staff to contact other local government agencies about sharing the cost of
operating Deer Hollow Farm. As a result, City of Mountain View staff hosted a meeting in
December 1993. Although several cities and both of the Mountain View area school districts sent
representatives to the meeting to show support for the program, the District was the only
organization that expressed interest in discussing cooperative funding alternatives.
The County of Santa Clara did not send a representative to the meeting. However, in January of
this year, in an action introduced by Supervisor Dianne McKenna, the County Board of Supervisors
approved a $50,000 grant toward the cost of providing educational programs at the farm. In her
report to the Board, Ms. McKenna envisioned that both the city and the District would provide an
equal match to the County Park Charter Fund grant, which would help fund the operation of the
farm for the fiscal year beginning July 1,1994.
After the Board of Supervisors approved the grant, District staff met with city and county
representatives to discuss alternatives to providing assistance in cash. County staff wanted to keep
the county's involvement as simple as possible by making a cash contribution, but did not object to
District staff s desire to explore other ways to participate in supporting the farm at a comparable
level.
Subsequently, city and District staff discussed the possibility of providing maintenance staff
resources instead of an actual cash contribution. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the future
330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
R-94-67 Page 2
of the farm, the city had not filled the regular maintenance worker position vacated by an employee
who retired in December. The city is willing to accept the District's contribution in the form of a
District staff member who will assist with farm maintenance. Details of this arrangement are
provided in the attached amendment to the agreement between the City of Mountain View and the
District.
DISCUSSION
Under the terms of the amended agreement, the District will provide the City of Mountain View
with maintenance staffing valued up to $50,000. The city will allocate a proportionate share of
educational programs to schools within the District's boundaries. Normally, the city gives
preference to Mountain View schools. The District's partnership with the city and the county will
be recognized on farm signs and publications. The entire agreement is contingent upon the county's
contribution of $50,000 to the city.
The District will assign a regular full-time open space technician to the farm. Staff will calculate
the value of the maintenance services performed by the open space technician. The calculations will
reflect the salary, benefits, and supervision costs associated with providing such services.
Depending on the assigned employee's salary range and health plan selection, the value should be
between $40,000 and $50,000. If the value of anticipated maintenance service does not reach the
required $50,000 to match the county contribution, the District will staff special projects at the
farm, or make up the difference in cash. The term of this agreement extends into the District's next
fiscal year. If any cash balance is due, the District will pay the city in the first quarter of our 1995-
1996 fiscal year from the outside maintenance service budget.
To lessen the impact of assigning a regular open space technician to Deer Hollow Farm, staff
recommends increasing the District's temporary field employee budget to provide the equivalent of
an additional full-time position. The cost of this increase for the full year of the agreement is
$25,000. However, for the balance of the current fiscal year, the Board needs to approve only
$19,000 for additional temporary staffing.
This proposal is advantageous to the City of Mountain View and the District. The city is assured a
qualified maintenance worker who is familiar with the cooperative relationship between the District
and the city. The city also gets a full-time maintenance worker at the farm for $8,000 less than last
year's cost. The District will provide an employee at the farm who will require less supervision
than a seasonal worker. The District also receives credit for the full value of salary, benefits, and
supervision while incurring only the cost of an additional seasonal position. However, the
temporary loss of a skilled and knowledgeable employee will impact the District's maintenance and
operation program. The Board should recognize that this is only a temporary solution. The
proposal provides the opportunity for the District, the city, and the county to test the feasibility of
jointly managing Deer Hollow Farm, and it provides the time necessary to explore long-term
funding alternatives.
Prepared by:
John Escobar, Operations Manager
Carleen Bruins, Visitor Services Supervisor
Contact person:
John Escobar
THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUNTAIN
VIEW AND THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is entered into this lst day of July
1994, by and between the CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, a municipal corporation, whose
address is 500 Castro Street, P.O. Box 7540, Mountain View, California, 94039, hereinafter
referred to as "CITY," and MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, a
public district under the laws of California, whose address is 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos,
California, 94022-1404, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT."
RECITALS
On November 12, 1981, the CITY and DISTRICT entered into an agreement allowing
CITY to provide activities for its citizens at DISTRICT's Rancho San Antonio Open Space
Preserve ("the 1981 Agreement") and amended said agreement on June 12, 1986 and
November 19, 1991 ("the 1986 Amendment and the 1991 Amendment").
WHEREAS, CITY desires to continue to operate Deer Hollow Farm, which is located
on Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve property owned by the DISTRICT; and
WHEREAS, the County of Santa Clara has agreed to provide $50,000 for the funding
of the Deer Hollow Farm program during the period July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995;
and
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT is willing to assist CITY in the operation of its program
during the period July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement have determined that continuation of Deer
Hollow Farm is a mutually agreed-upon goal;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and mutual obligations
contained herein, for the parties as herein expressed, CITY and DISTRICT agree as follows:
A. Description of Maintenance Services:
1. DISTRICT will provide CITY with maintenance services necessary for the
operation of Deer Hollow Farm, including one full-time maintenance worker
skilled work crews and supervision as required.
2. DISTRICT's provision of maintenance services shall not exceed Fifty
Thousand Dollars ($50,000) during the period July 1, 1994 through June 30,
1995. If provision of maintenance services during that period is less than Fifty
Thousand Dollars ($50,000), the DISTRICT shall pay the CITY the balance.
3. The value of maintenance services provided by DISTRICT shall be calculated
-1-
i
based on DISTRICT's costs for personnel, including salaries, benefits,
uniforms, training, and equipment used in provision of services.
4. Maintenance workers and crews will remain employees of the DISTRICT and
shall not be deemed agents, servants or employees of the CITY.
The operation of Deer Hol
low Farm shall be under the
� spo B. ( ratinnat Rensibilities:
direction of the City of Mountain View Community Services Director
or her
t o
designee. CITY will provide one full-time Senior Recreation Coordinator
manage/supervise the Deer Hollow Farm operation on a day-to-day basis. The Senior
Recreation Coordinator will also provide day-to-day direction to the full-time
maintenance worker provided by the DISTRICT.
C. Statement of Value of Services: The DISTRICT will provide the CITY with a
statement regarding the value of maintenance services provided on a quarterly basis.
Statements must be received by the City of Mountain View no later than October 15,
1994, January 15, 1995, April 15, 1995 and July 15, 1995 for the previous quarter.
D. Selection Process: CITY will participate in the selection process for the DISTRICT's
full-time maintenance worker assigned to Deer Hollow Farm. CITY's participation
will include one (1) CITY representative sitting as a member of the DISTRICT's oral
interview board for this position. However, the DISTRICT shall have the sole
authority to make the final determination with regard to any assignment or
employment of its employees.
E. Program Components: Registration for school class visits shall be allocated by the
CITY as follows:
• One-third of all available openings for the school year will be reserved for
schools located in Mountain View;
• One-third of all available openings for the school year will be reserved for
schools located both within the County of Santa Clara and the DISTRICT's
boundaries;
• s for the school year will be reserved for
One-third of all available opening
schools located in either the County of Santa Clara or the DISTRICT's
boundaries.
• Mountain View schools are included in all three categories listed above.
• Any remaining openings will be available for schools located outside of the
'
County of Santa Clara or the DISTRICT
's bounda
ries.
F.
F ees for Class Visits: CITY will establish and collect fees for class visits to the
PPertY
n
property. All proceeds from the
fees for such visits shall belong to the CITY. Fees
for class visits shall be based upon the following schedule:
-2-
• Forty Dollars ($40) per hour per class for schools located outside the County
of Santa Clara and the DISTRICT's boundaries;
• Thirty Dollars ($30) per hour per class for schools located in either the County
of Santa Clara or the DISTRICT's boundaries;
• Twenty Dollars ($20) per hour per class,for schools located within both the
County of Santa Clara and the DISTRICT's boundaries but outside of
Mountain View;
• Ten Dollars ($10) per hour per class for schools located in Mountain View.
G. Terms of Agreement: The term of this Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1994
and shall terminate on June 30, 1995, except if terminated earlier pursuant to the
provisions of this Agreement.
p �
H. Insurance:
1. DISTRICT shall carry general liability insurance, including owned, non-owned
and hired auto; property damage; death and bodily injury during the term of
this Agreement covering its risks arising out of its ownership of the property
and its risks arising out of its personnel involved with Deer Hollow Farm and
CITY shall be named additional insured on the policy. Said policy shall be in
an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per injury or death
to one person, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and One j
Million Dollars ($1,000,000) property damage. DISTRICT shall furnish CITY
a Certificate of Insurance evidencing such coverage.
2. CITY shall carry general liability insurance or be self insured for general
liability claims, including owned, non-owned and hired auto; property damage;
death and bodily injury during the term of this Agreement covering its risks
arising out of the performance of any acts pursuant to this Agreement or
relating to its operation of the Deer Hollow Farm program. DISTRICT shall
be named as an additional insured on the policy. Said policy shall be in an
amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per injury or death to
one person, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, and One
Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for property damage. CITY shall furnish
DISTRICT a Certificate of Insurance evidencing such coverage.
3. DISTRICT shall be responsible for the Workers' Compensation coverage and
care of DISTRICT employees, volunteers and agents, including DISTRICT's
employees, volunteers and agents involved with Deer Hollow Farm including
coverage for their involvement in accidents or illnesses arising out of use of
CITY vehicles or any equipment belonging to CITY. CITY shall be
responsible for the Workers' Compensation coverage and care of CITY
employees and CITY volunteers involved with Deer Hollow Farm including
-3-
I
coverage for their involvement in accidents or illnesses arising out of use of
CITY or DISTRICT vehicles or any equipment belonging to CITY or
DISTRICT.
I. Hold Harmless: CITY hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
DISTRICT from and against all liability for all claims, suits, damages, injuries, costs,
losses and expenses, including attorneys' fees and:court costs, in any matter related to
or arising out of the program, the operation, and or the use of Deer Hollow Farm
provided that the matter giving rise to the liability is directly attributable to the
negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of the CITY's employees or agents, or
otherwise arises out of matters which by the terms of this Agreement are the
responsibility of the CITY.
DISTRICT hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY, its officers,
agents and employees from and against all liability for all claims, suits, damages,
in an
expenses, including attorneys' fees and court costs, y
costs, losses and g Y
injuries, co Pe
matter related to or arising out of the program, the operation, and or the use of Deer
Hollow Farm provided that the matter giving rise to the liability is directly
agents,
attributable to the negligent or wrongful acts of the DISTRICT s employees or
li
or otherwise arises out of matters which by the terms of this Agreement are the
responsibility of the DISTRICT.
In the event liability arises due to the concurrent negligence of CITY and DISTRICT,
each party shall contribute costs of any such suits, defense, damage
s, costs and
liability in proportion to its fault as determined under the principles of comparative
negligence.
J. Applicable Laws: This Agreement shall be construed and enforced pursuant to the
laws of the State of California.
K. Notices: Any notice required to be given to DISTRICT shall be deemed to be duly
and properly given if mailed to DISTRICT, postage prepaid, addressed to:
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
General Manager
330 Distel Circle
Los Altos, CA 94022
or personally delivered to DISTRICT at such address or at such other addresses as
DISTRICT may designate in writing to CITY. Any notice required to be given to
CITY shall be deemed to be duly and properly given if mailed to CITY, postage
prepaid,aid addressed to:
e
City of Mountain View
Community Services Director
P.O. Box 7540
210 South Rengstorff Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039-7540
-4-
or personally delivered to CITY at such address or such other addresses as CITY may
designate in writing to DISTRICT.
L. Waiver: The failure of either party to insist upon a strict performance of any of the
terms, conditions and covenants contained herein shall not be deemed a waiver of any
rights or remedies that CITY or DISTRICT may have and shall not be deemed a
waiver of any subsequent breach or default of the terms, conditions and covenants
contained herein.
M. Severability: If any one or more of the covenants or agreements or portions thereof
provided in this Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction in a
final judicial action to be void, voidable or unenforceable, such covenant or
covenants, such agreement or agreements or such portions thereof shall be null and
void and shall be deemed separable from the remaining covenants or agreements or
portions thereof and shall in no way affect the validity or enforceability of the
remaining portions of this Agreement.
N. Captions: The captions in the articles of this Agreement are inserted for convenience
purposes only and shall not affect the terms of this Agreement.
O. Entire Agreement: Except as referenced herein, all other terms and conditions
contained in the agreement dated November 12, 1981, as amended from time to time,
shall remain in full force and effect.
P. Termination:
(A) Either party may, without cause, withdraw unilaterally from this Agreement upon
90 days' written notice to the other party, with the result that this Agreement shall be
terminated at the end of such 90-day period.
(B) It is understood and agreed by both parties that this Agreement is entered into on
the condition that County of Santa Clara provide CITY with the sum of Fifty
Thousand Dollars ($50,000) during the term of this Agreement for operation of the
Deer Hollow Farm program conducted by CITY and DISTRICT. In the event the
County fails to approve and appropriate such funds, DISTRICT may terminate this
Agreement upon 30 days' written notice to CITY.
Q. This amendment revises the 1981 Agreement as well as the 1986 Amendment and the
1991 Amendment thereto. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this
Third Amendment and any prior Agreement between the parties, the provisions of
this Third Amendment shall prevail. In all other respects, the terms and provisions of
any prior Agreements between the parties shall continue in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by CITY and DISTRICT.
-5-
This Agreement is dated 1994.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: "CITY":
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
a municipal corporation
By:
Community Services Director City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM: "DISTRICT":
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN
SPACE DISTRICT
City Attorney
By:
General Manager
District Legal Counsel
-6-
Open Space
R-94-70
Meeting 94-17 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
Ju
ne a 8, 1994
AGENDA ITEM
Review of Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for St. ph's Hill Open Space
Preserve
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIO
Tentatively adopt the revised Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for St. Joseph's Hill
Open Space Preserve as contained in this report.
Staff will submit the Comprehensive Use and Management Plan to the Town of Los Gatos
for review and comment before returning to you for final adoption.
Background. The Use and Management Plan for St. Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve was
last reviewed at your March 11, 1987 meeting (see report R-87-45, dated March 5, 1987).
Review of the plan was continued to your May 13, 1987 meeting. At the May 13th meeting,
you tentatively adopted the plan (see report R-87-74 dated May 6, 1993). Final,adoption of
the plan occurred at your September 23, 1987 meeting (see report R-87-144, dated
September 17, 1987). Contained below is a comprehensive listing of the new, revised, or
existing recommendations. Discussion of the new and revised recommendations follow under
separate subheadings in the Use and Management Plan Background and Discussion section of
this plan.
SUMMARY OF USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
1.0 Access and Circulation
1.1 Enter into an agreement with the Town of Los Adoption: Proposed
Gatos and the California Province of the Society of Scheduled: FY»94-95
Jesus (the Novitiate) to acquire the historic Jones Garad4: Possible
Trail alignment (segment 20). Request $2,500 from Cost: $51000
the Town of Los Gatos to acquire the trail Planning: 16 t�urs
alignment.
330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone:415-691-1200 FAX:415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
General Manager:L.Craig Britton
i
R-94-70 Page 2
1.2 Reopen the historic Jones Trail alignment (segment Adoption: Proposed
20). Work with the Town of Los Gatos to complete Scheduled: FY 94-95
the construction. Request $10,000 from the Town Grant: Possible
of Los Gatos to implement the project. Cost: $20U00
Planning: 16 hours.
Operations: 120 hours
1.3 Install hand rails at the blind corner located on the .Adoption: Proposed
current alignment of the Jones Trail. Widen this Scheduled': FY 94-95
short segment of trail. cost.'' $1,000
Planning: 4 hours
Operations: 40 hours
1.4 Realign the steep and rutted 700 foot segment of the Adoption: Proposed
current alignment of the Jones Trail (segment 3). Scheduled': FY 94-95
Cost: $4,000
Planning:> 8 hours
Operations: 240 hours
1.5 Consolidate trails on the west side of St. Joseph's Adoption Proposed
Hill to make one clearly defined trail leading to the Scheduled: FY 95-96
top of the hill. Realign the steep section of trail Grant: Calti us
segment 17. Close and restore the unofficial trails Cost: $2,500
in this area. Planning: 10 hours
Operations: 16 hours
I
1.6 Construct a multi-use trail from trail segment 16 to Adoption Proposed
the top of St. Joseph's Hill. Post "Not a through Scheduled: FY 95-96
trail on signs segment 16 to discourage trail users Grant: CalTrans
g g g
h former 7 from exitingthe reserve through t e o e Cost: 000
P $ y
1 r
Guadalupe College property. Planning: 6 hours
s
Operations: 300 hours
III'
1.7 Realign the existing trail/patrol road (segment 11) Adoption: Proposed
that leads to the top of St. Joseph's Hill to improve Scheduled: FY 95-96
the grade and reduce erosion. Close and restore the Grant: Caltrans
portion of trail segment 8 located northeast of the Cost: $15,000
proposed Caltrans oak mitigation site. Redirect trail Planning:! 10 hours
users to trail segment 21. Operations: 10 hours
f
R-94-70 Page 3
1.8 Construct a trail connection, linking the lower end Adoption: Proposed
of existing trail segment 18, that passes through the Scheduled': F'Y' 95-96
abandoned vineyard, to trail segment 13. Cost: $5,000
Planning. 10 hrs
Operations: 160 hours
2.0 Trail Use Designations
2.1 Designate existing trail segments 1,2, 4-13, 15-17, Adoption:! Proposed
21 as multi-use (i.e. open to hikers, runners, Scheduled: FY 94195
11
equestrians, and bicyclists). Planning Complete
2.2 Designate the current alignment of the Jones Trail Adoption: Proposed
(segment 3), a multi-use trail until the historic Jones Scheduled: 11FY 94/95
Trail (segment 20) is opened as an alternate route. Planning: Complete
Implement the proposed mitigation measures to
widen the trail and eliminate the steep sections.
Designate segment 3 as a "hiking only" trail when
the historic Jones Trail is reopened. Designate the
historic Jones Trail a multi-use trail.
2.3 Request that the Town of Los Gatos close their Adoption: Proposed
portion of the current alignment of the Jones Trail Scheduled: FY 94/95
to bicycles when the historic Jones Trail alignment Planning.j 4 hours
is reopened.
2.4 Designate trail segments 18 and 19 as multi-use. Adoption: Proposed
Implement the proposed mitigation measures to Scheduled: FY 94/95
improve line of sight. Planning: Complete
2.5 Construct proposed trails to the District standard for Adoption: Proposed
a multi-use trail and designate as such. Scheduled: Ongoing
Planning: Complete
3.0 Signing
3.1 Install trail directional signs on new and existing Adoption: Proposed
trails as needed. Scheduled: As needed'
Cost: $400
Planning: 16 hours
Operations: 16 hours
i
R-94-70 Page 4
3.2 Develop and install a preserve trailhead sign at both Adoption: Proposed
preserve entrances. Request permission from the Scheduled: FY 94-95
Town of Los Gatos and Santa Clara County Parks Cost: $3,5a0
to locate the signs at the Jones Road and Lexington Planning.j 24 hours
Reservoir trailheads. Seek design input from the Operations: $ hours
Town and the County.
3.3 Remove " walking zone" signs and post "No Adoption:- Proposed
Bicycle" signs on the current alignment of the Jones Scheduled; 94-95
Trail (segment 3), when the historic Jones Trail Cost: $50
alignment the (segment 20) is reopened. Planning: 4 hours
Operations: 8 hours
3.4 Post "Area Closed for Restoration" and "Closed. Adoption: Proposed
Not a Trail" signs at the pistol area and at any Scheduled: FY 95-96
closed unofficial trails in conjunction with the Grant: Caltrans
restoration of these areas. cost. $300
Planning: 4 hours
Operations: 8 hours
4.0 Brochure
4.1 Develop a computer generated site map and standard Adoption: Proposed
District brochure. Scheduled: FY 94-95'.
Cost: $2,Soo
Planning: 80 hours
4.2 Request permission from the County and the Town Adoption: Proposed
to install brochure boxes at the preserve trail heads Scheduled: F 94-95
off Alma Bridge Road and Jones Road. Cost: $100
Planning;' 2 hours
Operations: 2 hours
5.0 Structures and Improvements
5.1 Remove "walking zone" barriers on the current Adoption: Proposed
alignment of the Jones Trail (segment 3), when the Scheduled: FY I94-95'
historic Jones Trail alignment (segment 20) is Cost: None
reopened and the steep section of segment 3 is Planning:' None
realigned. Operations:X 16 hours
R-94-70 Page 5
5.2 Install chain link fencing, as required by the Adoption: Proposed'
Novitiate, along the eastern edge of the historic Scheduled: FY 94-95
Jones Trail alignment (segment 20) to prevent Cost: $35100
preserve visitors from entering the Novitiate Grant: Possible
property. Remove remains of the old flume and Planning:' 16 hours
restore area. Request $17,500 from the Town of Operations: 16 hours
Los Gatos to implement the project.
5.3 Install fence barriers and "Area Closed" signs as Adoption: Proposed
needed to discourage access into the old flume site, Scheduled: Ongoing
adjacent "party areas" and on unofficial shortcut Cost: Unknown'.
trails. Operations: Ongoing
5.4 Oversee the installation of wire deer fence and the Adoption:' Proposed
above ground irrigation system for the proposed Scheduled: FY<95-96'.
Caltrans Oak Mitigation project. Cost: None
Planning 16 hours
Operations: 40 hours
5.5 Work with Santa Clara County and Town of Los Adoption:' Proposed
Gatos staff to improve the trail stiles located in Scheduled: FY'i94-95'.
Lexington Reservoir County Park and in Novitiate Cost: Unknown
Park. Planning:' 12 hours
Operations: 10 hours
5.6 Remove barbed wire fence located along the current Adoption; Proposed
alignment of the Jones Trail (segment 3) and in the Scheduled: Ongoing
area between St. Joseph's hill and the former pistol Cost: None
range. Planning: None
Operations: 40 hours
6.0 Natural Resources and Agricultural Management
6.1 Close and restore all unofficial "shortcut" trails. Adoption Proposed
Scheduled: Ongoing
Cost: Unknown
Operations: Unknown
6.2 Increase the annual road maintenance budget Adoption: Proposed '
consistent with budget guidelines, so all preserve Scheduled: Ongoing
roads can be graded more often and drainage Cost: Unknown
problems corrected.
R-94-70 Page 6
6.3 Inventory invasive non-native plant species and Adoption: Pr000sed
develop a management plan. Scheduled: FY 95-96i
Cost: Unknown)
Planning: Unknown'
6.4 Work with Caltrans to formalize an agreement for Adoption: Proposed
the proposed Oak Mitigation Project. Oversee the Scheduled.- FY 94-95
project, including the oak and shrub plantings, and Cost: None
monitor subsequent maintenance activities. Planning: 12 hours
6.5 Restore the former pistol range. Adoption: Proposed
Scheduled: Ty 95-96
Grant: Caltrans
Cost: $10,000
Planning: 12 hours
6.6 Restore the erosion gully located on the west slope Adoption: Proposed
of St. Joseph's Mill. Scheduled: FY 95 -96
Grant:., Caltrans
Cost: $10,000
Planning: 12 hours
7.0 Visitor Safety and Public Liability
7.1 Continue current level of ranger patrol on the Adoption; Proposed
preserve. Implement ranger bicycle patrol on the Scheduled: Ongoing
preserve. Operations: 8 hrs/wk
8.0 Special Activities
8.1 Continue existing dog use regulations on the Adoption: Proposed
preserve. Scheduled: Ongoing
9.0 Dedication Status
9.1 Dedicate the 3 acres of the preserve that remain Adoption: Proposed
undedicated as public open space during the annual Scheduled: 12/94
review of the dedication status report in December.
ST. JOSEPH'S HILL OPEN SPACE PRESERVE
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
The 173-acre St Joseph's Hill Open Space has the right of way over all trail users. A hiker has
Preserve is located in the foothills directly south of Los the right-of-way over a bicyclist or a jogger.
Gatos. St. Joseph's Hill, located at the eastern edge
of the preserve, provides panoramic views of the Santa This basic trail etiquette provides an
Clara Valley, Lexington Reservoir, and the Sierra Azul opportunity for everyone to enjoy the preserves.
Range. Remnants of abandoned vineyards can be Abuses of trail etiquette should be brought to the
found on the upper slopes. attention of a:District ranger.
Approximately four miles of trail wind through For your own safety, please stay on
open grassland, chaparral and oak woodland. Dogs on designated trails at all times and observe the 15-mph
leashes are allowed on all trails. The Jones Trail is a trail speed limit. Bic yclis ts mus t wear helme ts. Please
popular trail connecting Novitiate Park in Los Gatos to observe all other posted regulations.
Lexington Reservoir County Park. A portion of this
trail follows the alignment of the historical Jones Road. Caution: rattlesnakes are native to these
From the mid-1 800's until 1925,this narrow and steep foothills and are especially active in warm weather,
stage coach road connected Los Gatos to the towns of Poison oak grows on most preserves; learn to
Lexington and Alma. Both towns were covered by identify it in all seasons in order to avoid it. For your
water when Lexington Reservoir was built in 1952. own safety, please stay on the trails at all times.
Please observe all posted parking and trail
Sections of the Jones Trail are narrow with regulations. Fines can be expensive!
steep side slopes. To accommodate hikers, runners,
and bicyclists on this heavily used trail, an 1,800 foot THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
segment of the trail has been designated a walking
zone. All bicyclists must walk. The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space
District is an independent special district created in
HOW TO GET THERE 1972 by the voters of northwestern Santa Clara
County and joined in 1976 by southern San Mateo
From Highway 17, take the Alma Bridge Road County. The District's boundaries encompass 16
exit. Public parking is available in Lexington Reservoir cities and extend from San Carlos to Los Gatos and
County Park. The trail to St. Joseph's Hill starts from Skyline Boulevard to San Francisco Bay.
Ilf opposite the boat launching area at the north end of
the reservoir. The District's purpose is to acquire and
preserve foothill and bayland open space outside the
PROTECTING YOUR PRESERVE urbanized areas of the peninsula for the use and
enjoyment of the public.
The preserve is open from dawn to dusk. All
natural resources are protected. Leave rocks, plants FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
and animals undisturbed for others to enjoy. For your
own safety and for the protection of your preserve, no The Visitor's Guide, a District publication
motor vehicles, guns, or fires are allowed. available free of charge, describes all the open space
preserves. Topographic maps of individual preserves
SHARING THE PUBLIC TRAILS are also available from the District.
Whenever a trail is too narrow to accommodate Please call, write or visit us: Midpeninsula
more than one person, the right-of-way must be given Regional Open Space District; 330 Distel Circle; Los
to the slowest-moving person or group. An equestrian Altos, CA 94022; (415) 691-1200.
Open Space
MWPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN S C p
E DISTRICT
S . Joseph's Hill OA n Space Preserve "`
�" .,fir`.:��`s _�_ ��;r ' .;�� •� �►:`:. _ .y _-
�.i PROPOSED
r-` LOS GAT TOWN TRAIL
CREEK TRAIL
*. : JONES,� Trail Use r
L ;.�"�f • IROAD Map Legend
Proposed Hiking Trails
HIGHWAY 1 7 —•— Proposed Multi-Use Trails
County Parking
s Restroom
t--; Proposed Trail Realignment ,
NOVITIATE 71 Other Public
To Be Determined EM Lands
PARK ———— Existing Multi-Use Trails
Closed Trails To Be No Public Entry
Private Lands !
Restored t
WALKING ZONE:
ALL BICYCLISTS LJf
MUST
HISTORIC JONES TRAIL - �'`4���'j��'' � /� •
r
NOTE:
SEGMENT 3 IS
TEMPORARILY OPEN
TO BICYCLISTS,
UNTIL THE HISTORIC / f
JONES TRAIL IS OPEN. ( �;
3 -
OPEN SPACE rir
EASEMENT ,
CURRENT JONES "!
TRAIL ALIGNMENT ,",
16
a� X,
`FI - _
4
r' L22 ,f 19
❑ L •
S
/d °`�f, t� / 19 ` 1` r r 12�� `�r. 14
,� l��k ��'�,'!
MANZANITA TRAIL—
ALMA BRIDGE ROAD:.
Note: Dogs on leash are allowed��%J
on all preserve trails.
LEXINGTON RESERVOIR
COUNTY PARK r �'
ljjFf (f/tf
EXHIBIT A May 1994
0.0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1.0
One Mile
i
R-94-70 Page 7
f
SUMMARY OF COSTS BY YEAR*
USE & MANAGEMENT PLAN HEADING FY 94/95 FY 95/96 TOTA
L
1.0 Access & Circulation *30,000 ***29,500 59,500
.0 Trail Use Designations
.0 Signing 3,750 ****500 4,250
.0 Brochure 2,600 2,600
.0 Structures & Improvements **35,000 35,000
.0 Natural Resources *****20,000 20,000
TOTAL 71,350 50,000 121,350
(The cost of some projects are not known anj not included on the chart.)
* Includes potential outside funding of $12,500.
** Includes potential outside funding of$17,500.
*** Includes potential outside funding of$24,500.
**** Includes potential outside funding of$300.
***** Includes potential outside funding of$20,000.
I
I
R-94-70 Page 8
USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Site Description and Use: (see attached Exhibit A)
This 267-acre preserve is located in the hills directly south of the Town of Los Gatos. It
includes a 94-acre open space easement over the adjacent property owned by the California
Province of the Society of Jesus. The preserve is bordered by Lexington Reservoir County
Park to the south, Los Gatos Creek and the Los Gatos Creek Trail to the west, Novitiate
Park to the north, and the former Guadalupe College to the east. The former college is now
under private ownership. The college buildings are currently vacant and not in use.
Facilities operated by the California Province of the Society of Jesus (the Novitiate), are
located north of the open space easement.
The main public access into the preserve is through Lexington Reservoir County Park to the
south. Parking and portable restrooms are available in the county park at the north end of
the reservoir, off Alma Bridge Road. Neighborhood access is available at the north end of
the preserve via Jones Road through adjacent Novitiate Park. Novitiate Park is owned and
managed by the Town of Los Gatos.
The preserve attracts bicyclists, runners, and hikers. Because of the lack of appropriate
staging areas, equestrian use is not encouraged on the preserve. The Jones Trail is a popular
trail connecting Novitiate Park in Los Gatos to Lexington Reservoir County Park. Many
visitors combine this trail with the Los Gatos Creek Trail to make an approximate three and
one-half mile loop. Trails also lead to St. Joseph's Hill, a grassy knoll 1253 feet in elevation
located at the eastern edge of the preserve. From here visitors can enjoy panoramic views of
the Santa Clara Valley, Lexington Reservoir, and the Sierra Azul Range. El Sereno Open
Space Preserve can also be seen from this point.
The preserve attracts a considerable amount of use by visitors with dogs. Dogs on leash are
allowed on all trails within the preserve. This is discussed in more detail in the Use and
Management Plan Discussion, section 8 Special Activities.
There have been no additions to the preserve since the last use and management plan review
in 1987.
Planning Considerations:
The preserve is located within unincorporated Santa Clara County in the Sphere of Influence
of the Town of Los Gatos.
Joint Powers Agreement: In 1981, the District and the Town of Los Gatos entered into a
joint powers agreement that provided the basis of the cooperative purchase of St. Joseph's
Hill Open Space Preserve. The agreement, as amended October 10, 1982 (see report R-84-
i
I,
i
R-94-70 Page 9
42 of October 3, 1982), required the Town to annex the preserve to facilitate joint planning,
development, maintenance, and patrol. The agreement also contained provisions for the
Town to review and approve any site development and use proposals for the preserve.
District staff is working with the Town to transfer title of the remaining portion of the flume
to the Town. The District acquired the San Jose Water Company's flume property in 1986,
with the provision that the Town of Los Gatos would accept the lower portion of the flume
located adjacent to Novitiate Park. The Town intended to preserve a portion of the flume for
historical purposes.
Novitiate Park is adjacent to the preserve's northernmost property line and serves as an
entrance to the preserve. The park is currently owned and managed by the Town of Los
Gatos. To insure public trail access to the preserve, the District has asked the Town for a
recorded right of access for trail purposes.
Proposed Western California University Project: Since the last review of this preserve,
the proposed Western California University, formerly Guadalupe College, has been the
subject of a great deal of public discussion. In 1988, local citizens formed "Citizens for the
Preservation of St. Joseph's Hill" in an effort to halt construction of the proposed access
road through the preserve. The access road was proposed to be built on an existing
easement. The new road would have significant impacts on the preserve and surrounding
lands. It would require extensive grading and would remove a portion of the historic Jones
Trail. To address the strong public concern over the project, the Town hired a consultant to
study alternative road alignments. The Town modified the original use permit rerouting the
access road along a more favorable alternative alignment that avoids the preserve.
In 1989, the developer of the proposed Western California University initiated litigation
against the Town. Santa Clara County Superior Court ruled that the proponents had the right
to build an access road from Alma Bridge Road through the preserve to the proposed
Western California University. The District Court of Appeal upheld the Superior Court's
ruling in favor of the project.
In 1990, Santa Clara Valley Water District denied a request from the developer for an
easement on Alma Bridge Road. Without this easement, the proposed access road from
Alma Bridge Road cannot be built.
In 1991, the developer filed an application with the Town to use Foster Road as an access
road to the proposed college site. The Town indicated that it was unlikely that they would
approve the application. The applicant has not pursued it, so the project is currently at a
standstill.
Lexington Reservoir Route 17 Interchange Project: The proposed Lexington Reservoir
Interchange Project is located south of the Town of Los Gatos, adjacent to the western side
of Lexington Reservoir. It involves construction of an interchange at Bear Creek Road as
i
R-94-70 Page 10
well as a second set of northbound Route 17 ramps at Alma Bridge Road. In the long-term
plan, a two-way frontage road will be constructed to connect with Old Santa Cruz Highway
and the Alma Fire Station on the east side of the interchange overcrossing. On the west side
of the overcrossing, a two-way frontage road will be constructed between Bear Creek, Black,
and Montevina Roads.
The primary purpose of the project is to provide safe access between Route 17 and five side
roads in the Lexington Reservoir area. The project will also offer new opportunities for
pedestrian, equestrian, and bicycle trail connections to Lexington Reservoir County Park, St.
Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve, and other surrounding public lands.
The project was adopted in the 1992 State Transportation Improvement Program. The
current schedule for the project anticipates that construction would begin in the summer of
1995, with completion in the summer of 1996. The road improvements are the joint
responsibility of the Santa Clara County Transportation Agency and Caltrans.
The mitigation required for the transportation facility will include restoration of degraded oak
woodland and riparian habitat to compensate for that destroyed by the interchange
construction. The District is negotiating with Caltrans to provide an oak woodland
mitigation site on St. Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve. This is discussed further in the
Use and Management Plan Discussion, Section 6 Natural Resources and Agricultural
Management.
Lexington Reservoir County Park: In 1987, a master plan for Lexington Reservoir County
Park was presented to the Board of Supervisors for their approval. This plan presented a
highly commercialized park and included a marina, restaurant, and swimming lagoon. In
response to strong citizen protest against the proposed commercial development of the lake,
the Master Plan was set aside until the Highway 17 interchange configuration was resolved.
In October of 1992, the County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution establishing a
passive development policy for the park. This policy maintains the status quo at the park
until such time that a new park master plan is developed with community input. A primary
goal of the master plan, when developed, will be to maintain the passive recreational
activities at the lake. The primary focus of the Master Plan development would be facilities
for hiking/horseback riding, fishing, non-powered boat rentals, and picnicking. Funding for
this plan is currently not contained in the County's proposed five year capital improvement
plan.
i
Santa Clara Valley Water District will begin developing comprehensive resource management
plans for each of their watersheds sometime this year. This planning process will include the
Lexington Reservoir Basin. District staff has expressed interest in participating in the Water
i
District's planning process.
1
i
i
R-94-70 Page 11
Public Workshop: On Saturday, January 30, 1993, a public workshop was held at the
Preserve to gather input for the use and management plan. Approximately 15 people
attended. Staff explained the District's planning process and gave a brief presentation on the
preserve's history, access, patrol, and trail use. After the presentation, attendees were given
the opportunity to ask questions, comment, or share ideas about the preserve. Staff then lead
the group on a tour of the preserve. Public comments during the workshop generally
focused on restoration of St. Joseph's Hill, trail alignments, dog use, and trail conflicts.
Specific suggestions included the following:
1. Open the gate to Novitiate Park earlier each morning.
2. Restore the area near the old vineyard.
3. Keep the trail on the ridge to allow views to the north and south at the same time.
4. Consider keeping some of the informal/volunteer trails because they have better grades
and alignments than the signed trails.
5. Install a bench underneath the oak tree in the southwest portion of the preserve. From
this location, one can view the hills west of Hwy 17.
Use and Management Plan Discussion: The following is a discussion of the status, issues,
and concerns related to each element of the Use and Management Plan Summary being
considered for adoption at the beginning of this report.
1.0 Access and Circulation
The preserve continues to be popular with hikers, runners, and mountain bicyclists
because of its close proximity to the Town of Los Gatos, Highway 17, and Lexington
Reservoir County Park. Many trail users combine the Jones Trail with the Los Gatos
Creek Trail, located below the Lexington Reservoir dam, to make a three and one-
half mile loop. On a summer weekend day, 800 to 1000 people will use the Los
Gatos Creek Trail. Recent surveys indicate an average of 300 to 500 people visit the
preserve on a typical summer weekday. The majority of trail users visit the preserve
in the morning and evening. Staff estimates that approximately 700 to 1000 people
visit the preserve on a weekend day.
The Town of Los Gatos has proposed a trail connection from Los Gatos Creek Trail
through Novitiate Park to the Jones Trail. This will provide a shorter, more
desirable, loop trail. The project is tentatively scheduled for construction in the
Town's 1995-96 budget year. District staff will cooperate with the Town on this
project.
Jones Trail Walking Zone: The District established an 1800 foot "walking zone" on
the current alignment of the Jones Trail approximately six years ago. This segment
of the Jones Trail has steep side slopes, steep grades, and several blind corners.
Because of the high user demand, the District created the "walking zone" so that the
trail could safely accommodate multi-use (i.e. hikers, runners, and bicyclists). All
III
R-94-70 Page 12
trail users were required to walk along this segment of trail that is clearly identified
by signs and trail barriers.
The "walking zone" has proved unsuccessful: compliance is very low; many trail
users ignore the posted signs; the signs are often vandalized. In past years, District
patrol of this site has been infrequent because of difficult access and limited staff
available. Enforcement is very difficult because of the trail's high use. Often while a
ranger has stopped a bicyclist or runner in the "walking zone," three or more trail
users may run by. In addition, many visitors who have been stopped by a ranger will
run or get back on their bicycles as soon as they are out of sight of the ranger. In the
last few years, the District has received a number of letters and phone calls from
preserve users concerned about their safety when using the trail.
The "walking zone" originally applied to bicyclists and runners. The District's
Trail Use Guidelines and Mitigation Measures adopted January 27, 1993 and the
District's land use regulations (Ordinance 93-1) adopted July 28, 1993, allow the use
of "walking zones" in problem areas, but restrict only bicyclists. Runners are no
longer restricted because few recorded trail use conflicts have occurred involving
runners.
To be consistent with the adopted trail use guidelines and Ordinance 93-1, the Jones
Trail "walking zone" has been reopened to runners. New signs stating the "walking
zone" applies to bicycles only are posted along the trail.
St. Joseph Hill Trails: The top of St. Joseph's Hill resembles a motorcycle park.
New shortcut trails continue to be created and used despite staff s efforts to close,
fence, and sign them. At the public use and management workshop, a participant
indicated that some of these unofficial trails have better grades and alignments than
the signed trails.
A better defined trail system is needed for the hill portion of the preserve. The
primary objectives are: 1) to close exisiting trails that are steep, unsafe, deteriorating,
or which duplicate other trails; 2) to provide new trail alignments at proper grade
and cross-slope to connect exisiting roads to the top of the Hill; and 3) to protect
habitat by increasing undisturbed areas. In 1993, staff completed a trail inventory of
the preserve. During the inventory, staff evaluated the exisiting trails and determined
which ones should be eliminated or realigned.
Discussion of New and Revised Recommendations
1.1 District staff is working with the Town of Los Gatos and the California
Province of the Society of Jesus (the Novitiate) to reopen the historic Jones
Trail alignment (segment 20) that was severed by the preserve acquisition and
fence construction in 1985. If this trail is reopened to the public, the District
R-94-70 Page 13
will close the current alignment of the Jones Trail (segment 3) to bicycles.
The historic Jones Trail alignment will be widened to safely accommodate
multi-use.
A property survey was completed in June 1993. The trail crosses
approximately .8 acres of land owned by the California Province of the
Society of Jesus (the Novitiate). District staff is currently negotiating an
agreement to purchase the .8 acres.
1.2 The historic Jones Trail alignment (segment 20) follows an old road bed.
Portions of the trail are overgrown with vegetation. The trail also passes
through several potential slide areas. The District will need to clear vegetation
and construct several retaining walls before opening the trail to multi-use. In
addition, the purchase agreement with the Novitiate requires the District to
install chainlink fencing along the new property line. (see recommendation
5.2 of the Structures and Improvements section). The Town of Los Gatos has
offered to assist in the trail work needed to reopen the trail and cooperate with
the District on the overall project.
1.3 On the current alignment of the Jones Trail (segment 3), there is a sharp blind
comer about 400 feet from the north end of the "walking zone". The trail
width here is about 3 feet. The side slope exceeds 75%. The trail will be
widened and hand rails will be installed.
1.4 A 700 foot section of the "walking zone" (segment 3) located near the
southern end has steep grades and deep rutting. This portion of trail requires
continual maintenance and is an ongoing safety problem. Log barriers have
been installed along the trail to slow down trail users and encourage them to
walk. Many bicyclists ride right over the logs. Staff recently improved the
trail surface by filling in the ruts and redefining the trail width. This section
of trail will be realigned and the old section closed and restored.
1.5 Existing trails located on the west side of St. Joseph's Hill will be consolidated
into one clearly defined trail leading to the top of the hill. The steep and
rutted section of trail segment 17 will be realigned. Any unofficial trails in
this area will be signed closed and reseeded. The exisiting trail (segment 14)
along the erosion gully will be closed. See section 6.6 for recommendations
relating to restoration of the gully. Restoration of the closed areas and related
trail realignments will be funded through the proposed Caltrans mitigation
project.
1.6 The patrol road/trail (segment 16) paralleling the fenced property line of the
Novitiate ends at the gate to the former Guadalupe College. The caretaker at
the college property has informed staff that preserve trail users often try to
R-94-70 Page 14
climb the chainlink gate and trespass on the college property. This patrol road
should be signed "Not a Through Trail." A new trail leading from this area to
the top of St. Joseph's Hill will be constructed to provide preserve visitors an
alternative route and discourage trespassing. Construction of this trail will be
funded through the Caltrans Mitigation Project. See section 6.4 for discussion
of the mitigation project.
1.7 The Manzanita Trail leads to the top of St. Joseph's Hill. This trail is road
width and used as a main patrol route to the top of the hill. Trail segment 11,
located just below the top of St. Joseph's Hill, is steep, rutted, and needs
realignment. This segment of trail should be realigned and clearly designated
as an official trail. The section of trail segment 8 located north and northeast
of the proposed Caltrans oak mitigation site will be closed and restored to
avoid duplication of trails. Trail users will be redirected to trail segment 21.
Any unofficial trails in this area should be eliminated. Construction of this
trail will be funded through the Caltrans Mitigation Project. See section 6.4
for discussion of the mitigation project.
1.8 Trail segment 18, located in the central part of the preserve, takes trail users
through the old vineyard area and into a madrone and oak forest. It is a trail
experience that is unique on this portion of the preserve. The majority of
trails wind through chaparral or grassland. The trail currently ends about 900
feet from its beginning off of trail segment 12. Several unofficial trails lead
north and south from this trail. A formal connection linking this trail to trail
segment 10 will be constructed. The unofficial trails in the area will be
eliminated.
2.0 Trail Use Designations
The District will designate exisiting trail segments 1, 2, 4-13, 15-19, 21 as multi-use
trails, to be used by hikers, runners, equestrians, and bicyclists. Proposed trail
segments 20, 22,and 23 will also be designated multi-use. Currently, equestrian use
is not encouraged due to difficult access from the county park. Equestrians have not
expressed interest using the trail
system, probabl because there are no connections to
Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. The multi-use trail designation will accommodate
r
equestrians if access is improved and connecting trails can be developed in the future.
�1 P g P�
The current alignment of Jones Trail (segment 3) will be limited to hiking and
running use when the historic Jones Trail (segment 20) is re-opened. Multi-use on
the current alignment of the Jones trail is not recommended in the long-term because
of poor trail conditions and exisiting high level of use. In the short-term, however,
there are mitigation measures that can be employed to improve existing conditions to
an acceptable level including continuation of the "walking zone", realignment of a 700
foot trail section, trail widening, and installation of handrails. The measures require
R-94-70 Page 15
an unusual amount of staff resources for maintenance and enforcement that will be
reduced when the trail is closed to bicycle use.
Specific mitigation measures, addressed in section G, will need to be applied to trail
segments 18, 19, and 20 in order to accommodate multi-use. District staff is
working with the Town of Los Gatos to reopen the historic alignment of the Jones
Trail which will require retaining walls and widening. Inadequate sight lines and
narrow sections of trail will have to be improved to acceptable levels on trail
segments 18 and 19.
Refer to Exhibit A for identification of trail segments and their trail use designation.
Evaluation Process
The trail use designation for each trail at the preserve is based on an evaluation
process derived from the adopted Trail Use Guidelines and Mitigation measures. The
evaluation process examines physical characteristics of each trail as well as other
factors that assist in determining appropriate trail use. The evaluation process
addresses the eight elements contained in the Trail Use Guidelines and Mitigation
Measures. They include examining trail conditions, suitability based on physical
conditions, historic trail use, conflicts, compatibility of adjacent trail use, potential
improvements, constraints, and mitigation measures.
Staff inventoried twenty-one trail segments. These included all major trails in the
preserve and trail segment 20 that is currently closed to the public. The inventory did
not include trails that are fenced and/or signed as a "Closed Area" or unofficial trails
that are steep, rutted, and obvious "shortcut trails."
A. Trail Inventory - Typical Physical Conditions
Trails Length Width Grade Sight Line Side Slope
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1 .5 mile 9-12' 5-20% +100, 65-100%
2 .3 mile 10-12' 5-15% +75' 40-100%
3 .6 mile 4-5' 1-15% 30-100' 30-100%
4 .2 mile 12-14' 10-20% +100 +60% (fence)
5 .2 mile 8-12' 15% +100 10-60% (fence)
6 .1 mile 12' 9-16% 65-100 85%
7 .1 mile 8-12 5-7% +100 20%
8 .3 mile 9-11, 1-15% +100 8-35%
9 .1 mile 8' 7% +100 25%
A. Trail Inventory - Typical Physical Conditions (Continued) Page 16
Trails Length Width Grade Sight Line Side Slope
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10 .15 mile 89 11-18% +100 45%
11 .05 mile 129 17-21% 100 10%
12 .2 mile 99 4-8% +100 55-75%
13 .7 mile 9-129 1-5% 100 +60%
14 .07 mile 61 22% 100 0-45% (gully)
15 .2 mile 8-99 10-12% +100 10-60% (fence)
16 .3 mile 79 2-15% +100 +50 %
17 .08 mile 8-10' 23% 100 0-15%
18 4.15 mile 3-6' 3-15% 30-100 0-35%
19 .2 mile 49 1-15% 30-60 6-10%
20 .4 mile 3-10' 2-10% 100 +65%
21 .06 mile 7-14' 1-10% 100 0-5%
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Total 4.51 miles
B. Trail Use Suitability (Based on physical conditions only)
Trails *Suitability Comments
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1, 2, 4-17, Class A Class A trails generally have 6-10'
21 (Suitable for Multi-Use) width,varying grade and side slope, and
line of sight greater than 75'.
3 Non-Classified The trail is non-classified because the
width is generally over 5 feet but has
steep side slopes in excess of 30% and
unacceptable sight lines under 100 feet
In accordance with the guidelines, it was
further examined and found suitable for
multi-use on a temporary basis, assuming
proposed mitigation measures are
implemented to reduce potential conflicts.
(See "G" below).
B. Trail Use Suitability (Continued) Page 17
Trails *Suitability Comments
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
18, 19 Non-Classified These trails are most similar to Class B
but are non-classified because of
unacceptable sight lines under 100 feet
and narrow trail width. These trails
would be suitable for multi-use if the
proposed mitigation measures are
implemented to reduce potential conflicts.
(See "G" below).
20 Non-Classified This trail passes through private property
and is currently closed to the public. It is
non-classified because it consistently has
steep side slopes in excess of 30%, and
varies in width from 2 to 10 feet. There
are several slides on the trail, and it is
currently overgrown with vegetation.
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
*Based on physical conditions over 75% of trail length. Other factors must be considered
to determine a trail use designation.
C. Past, Present and Future Trail Use
Trails Trail Use Prior to Acquisition for Open Space
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1,2, 4-17, 20, 21 Unofficial trail use in the form of running, hiking and bicycling.
Trails Current Trail Use Based on a June & July 1993 Volunteer survey
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1, 2 Between 6:00 and 9:00 a.m. midweek, there was an average of 7
hikers, 6 runners, and 3 bicyclists per hour. There were 3 dogs off
leash and 2 dogs on leash observed during the 3 hour period.
Between 5:00 and 8:00 p.m. on a Monday, there was an average of 18
hikers, 38 runners, and 22 bicyclists per hour. There were 7 dogs on
leash and 6 dogs off leash observed during the 3 hour period.
4 Between 6:00 and 9:00 a.m. midweek, there was an average of 1
hiker, I runner, and 3 bicyclists per hour. There were 2 dogs off leash
and 1 dog on leash observed during the 3 hour period.
Between 5:00 and 8:00 p.m. on a Monday, there was an average of 2
hikers, 11 runners, and 20 bicyclists per hour. There were no dogs
observed.
C. Past, Present and Future Trail Use (Continued) Page 18
Trails Projected Pattern of Trail Use Over Next 10 Years
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Level of trail use by hikers, runners and bicyclists may increase in
1-21 conjunction with potential future development of Lexington Reservoir
County Park and additional trail access into Sierra Azul Open Space
Preserve.
D. Trail Use Conflicts
1993 Conflicts (January - December)
Trails Complaints Reported Written Warnings/
Accidents Citations
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
All I- Bicyclist 3 - Bicyclists 1 - Bicyclist
1994 Conflicts (January - April)
Trails Complaints Reported Written Warnings/
Accidents Citations
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
All none 2 - Bicyclists 21 - Bicyclists
E. Adjacent Land Use
Trails Adjacent Land Compatibility Issues
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1 Lexington Reservoir County Park hours are 8:00 a.m. to dusk.
County Park Equestrian access is difficult.
3 Novitiate Park Novitiate Park hours are 8:00 a.m. to dark.
(Town of Los Gatos) Bicycles are permitted on the trail connecting to
the preserve trail proposed for hiking only.
There is no speed Emit or helmet requirement on
the trail connecting to the preserve.
16 Former Guadalupe College Trail ends at chainlink gate on the property
(private property) boundary. Trespass occurs frequently.
Page 19
F. Trail Use Opportunities and Enhancements
Trails Potential Improvement Benefits
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
11 Realignment of the existing road The realigned trail will have a gentler
on the southern side of St. grade and help discourage use of steep
Joseph's Hill. shortcut and unofficial trails in this part
of the preserve. The realigned trail
will be more suitable for multi-use.
20 Reopen the historic alignment of This provides a safer multi-use trail
the Jones Trail. connecting Novitiate Park with
Lexington Reservoir County Park. It
will bypass the current walking zone of
the Jones Trail.
22 New trail continuing from the This will create a desirable multi-use
lower end of trail segment 18 to trail connection winding through
segment 13. madrone and oak woodland. It will
increase the number of multi-use trails
and discourage steep shortcut or
unofficial trails in this part of the
preserve.
23 New trail connecting trail segment An alternative multi-use trail to the top
16 to the top of St. Joseph's Hill. of the hill will be provided, creating a
loop trail in the northeast portion of the
preserve. It will also direct trail use
away from the former Guadalupe
College.
G. Trail Use Constraints and Mitigation
Trails Problem/Constraint Potential Mitigation Measures
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
7-9, 11-14, 16, Unofficial trail use Install fences and signs where
18, 19, 21 unofficial trail use is occurring.
Restore unofficial trails to a natural
condition.
2, 3, 6, 18, 19 Short line of sight Maintain sight lines as necessary,
recognizing that rapid brush growth
may impair line of sight.
G. Trail Use Constraints and Mitigation (Continued) Page 20
Trails Problem/Constraint Potential Mitigation Measures
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
3 Narrow trail section Widen trail and add handrail.
with steep side slope Maintain and enforce existing
& blind comer "walking zone" for bicycles until
historic alignment of Jones Trail is
reopened.
3 Steep rutted trail Realign steep trail section.
section
5, 6, 9, 11-14, 17, 19 Excessive speed Install speed limit signs at all
entrances and use radar for education
and enforcement. Install signs for
helmet requirement at all entrances.
12, 15-17, 21 Uneven, rutted or Maintain surface as necessary,
rocky surface recognizing that trail base material can
not be significantly improved.
13 Boggy trail surface Maintain drainage as necessary,
in winter recognizing problems may reoccur
because of bad weather.
2, 3 Barriers limiting Work with County and Town to
access improve stile access.
1-20 Statistical Conduct bi-annual visitor survey to
information improve statistical data on trail use;
use database for accumulating
statistical information.
H. Use and Management Plan Compatibility
Trails Existing or Potential Incompatibility
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
8, 11 The proposed Caltrans Oak Mitigation Project may conflict with trail use
on the south side of St. Joseph's Hill. Realignment of trail #11 will help
divert trail use away from the project site. The mitigation project could
be seriously impacted by illegal bicycle use if bicyclists continue to use
unofficial trails. These trails can remain open to multi-use if heavy gauge
wire fence is installed around the project site.
i
R-94-70 Page 21
3.0 Si nin
The existing preserve trails have been signed with trail directional signs. New
trailhead signs have been installed on the Jones Trail near the northern preserve
boundary and near the southern boundary on the trail/patrol road entering the preserve
from Lexington Reservoir County Park. These new metal signs state the primary
preserve regulations, including the recently adopted 15 mph speed limit and helmet
requirement. They also identify the trail uses permitted on the preserve.
Special use signs relating to the "walking only" segment of the Jones Trail are posted
all along the trail. New signs stating the "walking zone" applies to bicycles only have
been posted along the trail. See the Access and Circulation section for discussion of
the "walking zone".
Removal and vandalism of the signs on the "walking zone" are very common. To
minimize vandalism of the special use signs, the field staff has set the sign posts in
concrete and welded the sign faces onto the posts.
Discussion of New and Revised Recommendations
3.1 Post trail directional signs on all new trails, including the original Jones Trail
alignment when the trail is reopened. Install additional signs where
appropriate on exisiting trails to enhance circulation within the preserve. Signs
will clearly show permitted trail use and trail distances.
3.2 Develop a new aluminum preserve map sign housed in a redwood frame. The
sign will be similar to the new signs at Russian Ridge, Skyline Ridge, and
Fremont Older Open Space Preserves. The map portion of the sign will
include detailed information on topography, trail use, trail distances, and
special features. The sign will highlight preserve regulations, and include an
area-wide map showing other District preserves. It will also include
information explaining the Town and District's joint acquisition of the
preserve, and the funding assistance from the Land and Water Conservation
Fund. Staff will seek permission from the County and the Town of Los Gatos
to locate these signs at the Jones Road and Lexington Reservoir trailheads,
since the preserve boundaries do not abut public traffic ways. Staff will also
request input on sign design and placement from the Town and County.
3.3 Eliminate the "walking zone" if the historic Jones Trail alignment (segment
20) is reopened. Remove "walking zone" signs and post "No Bicycle" signs on
the current alignment of the Jones Trail (segment 3).
g g
3.4 Install "Area Closed for Restoration" and "Closed. Not a Trail" signs at the
pistol range and on unofficial trails that have been fenced and reseeded. Signs
i
R-94-70 Page 22
will be paid for with funding from the Caltrans Mitigation Project. See
section 6.4 for discussion of the mitigation project.
4.0 Brochure
Staff has revised the 8 1/2 inch by 11 inch site map for the preserve. One side
consists of a topographic site map indicating trail locations and use designations. The
reverse side contains general site information, including how to reach the preserve,
local history, trail descriptions, trail etiquette, and preserve regulations. The site map
is currently available at the District office and handed out by the field staff.
Discussion of New and Revised Recommendations
4.1 Prepare a computer-generated site map similar to the maps for Skyline Ridge,
Russian Ridge, and Fremont Older Open Space Preserves. Incorporate this
map into a standard District brochure.
4.2 Request permission from the County and the Town to install brochure boxes at
the Alma Bridge Road and Jones Road trailheads. Install the boxes on the new
map sign boards discussed under recommendation 3.2.
i
5.0 Structures and Improvements
Trail barriers defining the beginning and end of the "walking zone" on the Jones Trail
have been improved. Additional log barriers have been installed along the steep trail
section reminding visitors that they should walk.
i
Split rail fencing and t-post and wire fencing have been installed at various places on
the preserve to prevent bicyclists from using unofficial shortcut trails. Fence barriers
have also been installed at several informal access points to the old flume site.
i
During the public workshop, a participant suggested that a bench be installed
underneath the oak tree along the southern portion of the Jones Trail. To prevent
recurrence of nighttime activities, staff is not recommending a bench at this time.
Discussion of New and Revised Recommendations
5.1 Remove the trail barriers on the "walking zone" if the historic Jones Trail
alignment is reopened and the steep section of segment 3 is realigned.
5.2 A portion of the historic Jones Trail alignment currently passes through the
adjacent property owned by the Novitiate. They are willing to sell this land to
the District with the condition that the District install chainlink fencing along
R-94-70 Page 23
the eastern edge of the trail to discourage trespass onto their adjacent property.
The historic Jones Trail alignment crosses the old flume right away formerly
owned by San Jose Water Works. Portions of the old flume still exist. Staff
recommends installing the chainlink fence in conjunction with purchasing the
property. Staff also recommends removing the remains of the old flume and
restoring the area, with the cooperation of the Town of Los Gatos.
5.3 Install additional fence barriers and "Area Closed" signs as needed to
discourage access into the old flume site, adjacent "party areas" and on
unofficial shortcut trails. Close and reseed all unofficial trails. Place brush
in these areas to discourage use. These projects will be paid for with funding
from the Caltrans Mitigation Project. See section 6.4 for discussion of the
mitigation project.
5.4 The Caltrans Mitigation Project includes installation of heavy gauge wire deer
fence around the perimeter of the proposed oak woodland mitigation site. The
fence will help prevent human and animal disturbance of the oak plantings. A
temporary above ground irrigation system, including an 8,000 gallon water
tank, will be installed as part of the project. The mitigation project is
discussed in recommendation 6.4 of the Natural Resources section.
i
5.5 Trail access to the preserve is through entry stiles located in adjacent
Lexington Reservoir County Park and Novitiate Park. These stiles are
currently narrow and restrictive for some trail users. District staff will work
with the County and the Town to improve the stiles and make them more
accessible.
5.6 Portions of an old barbed wire fence are located along the eastern side of the
Jones Trail approximately 1000 feet north of the St. Joseph's Hill Trail
junction. There is also barb wire fencing located in the middle section of the
preserve between St. Joseph's Hill and the old pistol range. Remove all
barbed wire fencing on the preserve as time permits.
6.0 Natural Resources and Agricultural Management
The upper slopes of St. Joseph's Hill are severely degraded due to past agricultural
use and present heavy use by mountain bicyclists. Prior to District ownership,
portions of the preserve were terraced and cleared of native vegetation to plant
vineyards. Poorly aligned access roads were also built. Today, the terracing and
remnants of the abandoned vineyards can still be found. Sections of the roads have
severe drainage problems and require continual maintenance. In 1992, field staff
regraded and improved the drainage on several of the roads.
R-94-70 Page 24
Informal unofficial trails, sometimes referred to as short cut or volunteer trails, cover
the hill. Some of these trails cut through chaparral areas and lead to illegal
campsites. Many of these trails were created by mountain bicyclists. They contribute
to the severe erosion problem on the hill and the accidents that occur when bicyclists
are unable to maintain control on these steep, loose, rocky, and often rutted trails.
Staff is currently formulating District-wide resource management policies. Once the
overall policies are adopted, a resource management plan will be developed for each
preserve as time and funding permits. The plan will contain specific
recommendations pertaining to issues such as elimination of invasive non-native
plants, revegetation, wildlife management, and wildland fire suppression.
Discussion of New and Revised Recommendations
i
6.1 Close and restore all unofficial "shortcut" trails as time permits. Till and seed
the trail tread. Place brush on the trails to discourage future use.
6.2 Increase the annual road maintenance budget as possible within the overall
budget guidelines to include annual road grading and correction of drainage
problems.
6.3 Scotch broom, eucalyptus, yellow star thistle, and other exotic plants can be
found on the preserve. Field staff has removed some scotch broom manually
during regular patrol of the preserve. Inventory invasive non-native plant
species on the preserve and develop a plan for their removal and site
restoration. Implement the plan as time permits and funding becomes
available.
6.4 The proposed construction of the Highway 17 Interchange at Lexington
Reservoir will destroy some oak woodland. The California Department of Fish
and Game requires Caltrans to mitigate for this loss of oak woodland. District
staff recommended that Caltrans consider St. Joseph's Hill Open Space
Preserve as a mitigation site.
Environmental consultants hired by Caltrans visited St. Joseph's Hill Preserve
in October 1992. They determined that areas on the top and south side of St.
Joseph's Hill were suitable for successful growth of California live oaks. Soil
types and vegetation patterns indicate that this area was formerly an oak
woodland and that it is gradually recovering.
District staff have been working with Caltrans over the past year and a half to
develop a mitigation/restoration project on St. Joseph's Hill Preserve that
meets the needs of the public and the requirements of California Fish and
Game. The oak woodland restoration project as currently proposed consists
i
i
i
R-94-70 Page 25
of: 1) planting of 1100 California live oaks in a five-acre area located on the
south side of St. Joseph's Hill; 2) installing of a temporary above-ground
irrigation system fed by a 8,000 gallon water tank; and 3) installing a six and
one-half foot high heavy gauge wire deer fence around the perimeter of the
oak mitigation site.
Caltrans has agreed to pay the District $45,000 for use of the preserve as a
mitigation site. These funds will be applied to resource management and trail
projects on the preserve. Resource management projects to be funded by
Caltrans are described in recommendations 5.3, 5.4, 6.5, and 6.6. Specific
trail projects to be funded b Caltrans are described in recommendations 1.6
P J Y
and 1.7 of the Access and Circulation section of the plan.
for h it continue work with Caltrans to formalize an agreement o t e
Staff will co t ue to 0
project.
6.5 The former pistol range located in the middle of the preserve will be restored
using Caltrans mitigation funds. This project may include removal of exisiting
asphalt, minor regrading, seeding, and signing.
6.6 The eroded gully located on the west slope of St. Joseph's Hill will be restored
using Caltrans mitigation funds. Restoration work would include adding fill,
erosion control mat or fiber, and seeding.
7.0 Visitor Safety and Public Liability
In past years, District rangers patrolled the preserve an average of two times per
week. Now that a ranger residence has been established on Mt. Umunhum, patrol of
the preserve has increased to an average of 4 to 5 times a week. District volunteers
also patrol the preserve occasionally. In the next few months, rangers will be
patrolling the preserve on bicycle as part of a recently adopted pilot program.
The preserve has been inspected for potential hazards and uses that may present a
threat to public safety. Potential hazards have been addressed.
Discussion of New and Revised Recommendations
7.1 Continue the current level of ranger patrol on the preserve. Implement ranger
bicycle patrol on the preserve.
I
I
I
R-94-70 Page 26
8.0 Special Activities
Dog Use
The preserve continues to attract a considerable amount of use by visitors with dogs.
Dogs on leash are currently allowed on all trails within the preserve. Despite the
posting of new metal regulatory signs, the leash requirement is often ignored. Now
that patrol of the preserve has increased, compliance with the leash requirement
should improve.
St. Joseph's Hill is one of five preserves included in the District's experimental dog
program. This program is currently being reviewed by the District's Use and
Management Committee. The committee intends to review general and site specific
policies for dog use on District lands.
Volunteer Projects
Four volunteer projects occurred on the preserve since the last use and management
plan review. In May 1989, volunteers restored approximately three-tenths of a mile
of the current alignment of the Jones Trail. Work involved removing slough, grading
the steep embankment, and widening the trail tread. Volunteers constructed split rail
fence barriers at several trail switchbacks and at unofficial "shortcut" trails. Twelve
volunteers participated in the event.
In April 1991, volunteers installed barriers on the Jones Trail to better define the
"walking zone" and to encourage trail users to walk on the section of trail. They also
installed switchback barriers on the Jones Trail.
In June 1991, volunteers blocked several unofficial "shortcut" trails. Split rail
barriers were installed and "area closed" signs posted. Brush was placed on the
unofficial trails to discourage future use. In June 1992, twenty two volunteers
constructed culvert pipe headwalls out of native rock and mortar. These headwalls
will help prevent erosion and subsequent plugging of culverts.
Discussion of New and Revised Recommendations
8.1 Continue permitting dogs on leash on the preserve.
9.0 Dedication Status
The preserve is comprised of 267 acres. Of the total preserve acreage, 170 acres are
dedicated public open space in fee title 94 acres are dedicated open space easements
P Pe P Pe P
and the remaining 3 acres (former San Jose Water Company land) are not dedicated.
The 3-acre property follows the alignment of the old flume. This property was
recommended for dedication at the time of purchase. At that time it was
R-94-70 Page 27
recommended that ownership of the portion of the former San Jose Water Company
land containing a section of the old flume be transferred to the Town of Los Gatos.
During the last review of the use and management plan, it was recommended that
dedication of this property be deferred until the details of a transaction were worked
out with the Town (see report R-87-45).
Discussion of New and Revised Recommendations
9.1 Dedicate the remaining 3 acres of undedicated land as public open space
during the annual review of the dedication status of District lands.
10.0 ADA Compliance
The proposed projects contained in this report comply with the 1990 Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). Exisiting physical barriers that limit access to trails have
been identified and recommended to be modified or allow full access. The preserve's
trail system has been inventoried and trail access information developed for public
distribution.
Five of the 21 trails inventoried on the preserve are described graphically on the
attached chart. (see Exhibit B). Four critical access factors are shown at the top of
the chart. Numbered trail segments are in the left column and on the map. The
graphic dots represent three levels of accessibility. As time permits, information for
the remaining trails will be added to the chart. The chart and map will be posted on
an information sign at major access points and available upon request from the
District office.
11.0 CMA Compliance
The projects contained herein are determined to be Categorically Exempt under the
guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Prepared by:
Sheryl Cochran, Open Space Planner
Contact person:
Same as above.
EXHIBIT B
TRAIL CONDITIONS AND ACCESSIBILITY
TRAIL WIDTH GRADE X SLOPE SURFACE NOTES
Maximum grade is 25%,
Narrow opening at
county park entrance,
Short rutted section.
Maximum grade is 21%,
Maximum cross slope
is 8%,
0 Rocky surface.
I
Maximum grade is 15%,
Rutted surface for 400'
0
Maximum grade is 18%,
!�li Asphalt surface for 40'
10 0 0 0
V,
0
I
Maximum grade is 20%
for 300',
1 :3] 0 0 Maximum cross slope
is 8%.
• > 6 Ft. • < 5% • < 2% . Smooth Slope & Grade
LEGEND ,� 4-6 Ft. Q 5- 10% Q 2-5% Q Loose 30%
2 0%
O < 4 Ft. O > 10% O > 5% O Rough 10%
5/15/94
'k Additional trails and information will be provided as time permits.
I
I
i
LEGEND
Existing Multi-Use Trails
Proposed Multi-Use Trails Ny.
Closed Trails To Be Restored
—x— Temporary Fence / '
Barrier
® Restoration Areas
16
A+ s
07
P
r
" n 23 1
p ` d 'A.
ns
15 % f
i
r i
Vs
y_
_� `•� ter'. . .
22 1SAL
s3 a J rrrior i rr r i rrr ririt`
`1al' �+ OAK MITIGATION
- AREA�.
n .. /
u x ,... s
1 c '
RESTORE RESTORE VINEYARD
PISTOL RANGE /' AND UNOFFICIAL TRAILS .
'Oe
2 .
T Mi
w+k".
I EXHIBIT C
AERIAL MAP OF RESTORATION AREAS
ST. JOSEPH'S HILL OPEN SPACE PRESERVE
F--t North do
May 1994
Open Space
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
R-94-68
Meeting 94-17
June 8, 1994
AGENDA ITEM
Adoption of Appendix A to District's Rules of Procedure Establishing Procedures and
Standard Forms for Closed Sessions
LEGAL COUNSEL'S RECOMMENDATION SNA+&-&C�
Adopt the attached Appendix A to the District's Rules of Procedure.
DISCUSSION
Legislation which became effective on April 1, 1994 made substantive changes to the Ralph
M. Brown Act which governs the public meetings of legislative bodies such as the District's
Board of Directors.
On March 23, 1994, the Board adopted revisions to its Rules of Procedure implementing this
new legislation. On May 11 1994 Legal Counsel briefed the Board on the impact of these
g g Y
P
changes.
Legal Counsel is now proposing a step to further implement this legislation. Adoption of the
attached Appendix A to the District's Rules of Procedure will set out the new rules for
closed sessions in further detail. As requested by Board member Siemens, the Appendix
also contains standard forms for use in holding closed sessions.
The significant provisions proposed for adoption are:
I
i • Adoption of a standard format for the required public notice of items to be discussed
in closed session.
i
• Adoption of a formal rule of confidentiality of closed session discussions except
where disclosure is required by the Brown Act or authorized by the Board.
The District has been following this practice, which is essential if a closed session is
to serve a useful purpose; however, Legal Counsel suggests adoption of a written rule
to insure a consistent policy on this issue.
I
330 Distel Circle * Los Altos, California 94022-1404 a Phone: 415-691-1200 * FAX:415-691-0485 iTi
Board of Oireectors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKihb in, Ieena Fienshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nanette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wirn de Wit
R-94-68 Page two
I
• The requirement that the Board reconvene in open session to announce certain nail
actions taken in a closed session.
Prepared by:
Sue Schectman, Legal Counsel
Contact person:
Same as above
i
I
I
APPENDIX
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
RULES OF PROCEDURE
CLOSED SESSION PROCEDURES & STANDARD FORMS
1. At least 72 hours before a regular meeting of the Board of Directors and at
least 24 hours before a special meeting, the District Clerk shall post the Board's
agenda containing a brief general description of each item of business to be
transacted or discussed in the closed session. The description should be
consistent with the form attached as "Standard Form 1". The closed session
shall also be listed on the agenda by number as "Closed Session Agenda Item
No.
2. Prior to the closed session, the Board of Directors shall convene in open
session.
The Board President shall announce the purpose or purposes of the closed
session, state the statutory authority for the session and state the items to be
discussed in the closed session.
Alternatively, the Board President can refer to the closed session as listed on
the agenda: "The Board will hold a closed session for the purpose of
discussing "Closed Session Agenda Item No.
3. The Board then may adjourn to its closed session.
4. At the conclusion of the closed session, a "Closed Session Minutes and Record
of Action Taken" form ("Standard Form No.2") is prepared by the District
Counsel, District Clerk or District General Manager. The form shall be
entered into a Minute Book which shall be a confidential document maintained
by Legal Counsel. The Minute Book will be available for inspection by any
Board member or other authorized person.
5. Where final action has been taken on a matter in closed session, the Board shall
reconvene into public session and the President shall make any public
announcements required by Section 54957.1 of the Ralph M. Brown Act.
i
6. Confidentiality is essential if a closed session is to serve its statutory purpose.
Therefore, Board members and staff will adhere to a strict policy of
confidentiality. No person may disclose any statements, discussions, documents
or votes made in a closed session except where authorized by the Board or
where required by the Ralph M. Brown Act.
i
i
STANDARD FORM NO, 1:
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA DESCRIPTIONS
Type of Closed Session Item;
1. Conference with Real Property Negotiator
2. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation
3. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation
4. Public Employment Item
5. Labor Negotiations
6. Other - check with District Clerk
1. Conference with Real Property Negotiator
Real Property or Properties; Specify street address, or if no street address, the parcel number or other
unique reference
Negotiating Parties: Specify name of person with whom negotiator may negotiate
Under Negotiations: Specify whether instruction to negotiator will concern price, terms of payment, or both
2. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation- Govt. Code § 54956.9(a)
A. Name of Case (Identify each case b reference to title of case claimant's name name f r
o artier o
� fY Y P
claim numbers)
B. If disclosing the case name of existing litigation would jeopardize service of process or jeopardize
ongoing settlement negotiations;
Name of Case Unspecified: Disclosure will jeopardize service of process or ongoing settlement
negotiations.
3. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation- Govt. Code § 54956.9(b)
A. When you desire to hold a closed session relating to anticipated litigation that has not yet been filed, the
agenda description will be:
Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation.
Significant exposure to litigation(specify number of potential cases)
No. of cases:
B. If deciding whether or not to initiate litigation, the description will be:
Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation.
Initiation of litigation: (specify number of potential cases)
No. of cases;
Standard Form No. 1
i
II
I
4. Public Employment
A. Public Employee Appointment
Title of Position to be Filled:
B. Public Employee Employment, Evaluation or Dismissal
Title of Position Being Filled or Reviewed:
C. Public Employee Disci line Dismissal or Release
P
(No further description necessary)
5. Labor Negotiations
A. Conference with Labor Negotiator- Represented Employees
Agency
Employee Organization:
B. Conference with Labor Negotiator- Unrepresented Employees
Agency Negotiator:
Unrepresented employee(s) or group:
I
I
I
Standad Form No. 1
C 0 N F I D E N T I A L
MIDI, INSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPAC. DISTRICT
CLOSED SESSION MINUTES and RECORD OF ACTION TAKEN
DATE OF CLOSED SESSION: 1994
TIME SESSION COMMENCED: TIME SESSION CONCLUDED:
BOARD MEMBERS ATTENDING: Ginny Babbitt, President Robert McKibbin
Pete Siemens, Vice President Betsy Crowder
Teena Henshaw Nonette Hanko
Wim de Wit
OTHER PERSONS ATTENDING:
PURPOSE OF CLOSED SESSION:
1. FIRST TOPIC DISCUSSED:
ACTION TAKEN/DECISIONS MADE:
Name Aye NU Abstain Absent
Ginny Babbitt, Pres.
•
Pete Siemens, V.P.
Robert McKibbin
Teena Henshaw
IF I =1 I
1N=onette Hankoao
Bets Crowdera0
Wim de Wit
I[Voting Tally �[�
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION FROM CLOSED SESSION:
El Disclosure approved as follows:
El Disclosure not approved at this time.
Person Authorized to Disclose:
Information Authorized to be Disclosed:
When Disclosure Authorized to be Made:
To Whom Disclosure Authorized to be Made:
Standard Form No. 2
2. SECOND TOPIC DISCUSSED:
ACTION TAKEN/DECISIONS MADE:
Name Aye No Abstain Absent
Ginny Babbitt, Pres.
jPete Siemens, V.P.
Robert McKibbin ��EA I
Teena -IE-1
Renshaw
IF 17 1 11
F Nonette Hanko OCR
Bets Crowder ��E_ 11 11
de Wit [
I Fw-i m- IF LJ 11 1
Voting Tally
1E=I I
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION FROM CLOSED SESSION:
Disclosure approved as follows:
Disclosure not approved at this time.
Person Authorized to Disclose:
Information Authorized to be Disclosed:
When Disclosure Authorized to be Made:
To Whom Disclosure Authorized to be Made:
APPROVED: (Signatures of Board Members Attending)
By:
Date:
Standard Form No. 2
Open Space
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: C. Britton, General Manager
DATE: June 3, 1994
SUBJECT: FYI
I
a
� I
330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485.
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert MCKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
General Manager:L.Craig Britton
Open Space
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
May 27, 1994
Terry Segal
Office Coordinator '
The Trail Center
3921 East Bayshore Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Dear Terry:
Thanks for your recent letter requesting a permit for a lemonade stand on District land. I
understand that your goal is to increase awareness of the Trail Center and of trail issues by highlighting
your educational display and providing a location to distribute your excellent Peninsula Parklands map.
While the District applauds your efforts, we cannot endorse or approve any kind of commercial
sales on District land, even for a private non-profit organization such as the Trail Center. This would be
inconsistent with our general policies and philosophy, and would set a serious precedent for such use by
other non-profits and by private groups. In the past we have rejected similar requests from private
concerns who would no doubt want to revisit this issue if we allowed any other group to engage in sales
activity.
You might want to consider contacting Caltrans or San Mateo County for permission to set up
your stand on public right-of-way on Skyline Boulevard, in a turn-out or other area with high bicycle
traffic, for example.
Again, thank you for contacting us with this request, and I'm sorry that we cannot accommodate
'
you. Please feel free to call me if you'd like clarification or further information.
Sincerely,
Malcolm Smith
Public Affairs Manager
MS/mcs
cc: L. Craig Britton
Board of Directors, MROSD
330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone`. 415-691-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
General Manager:L.Craig Britton
Open Space
June 1, 1994 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
Marshall Burak, Dean
School of Business
San Jose State University
BT 950
One Washington Square
San Jose, CA 95192-0065
Re: Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve, Mt. Umunhum area (former,Almaden Air Force
Station)
Dear Mr. Burak:
It has been several years since there has been any communication regarding the potential use
of the former Air Force Station facilities. After years of delays, and constant pressure from
the District and local elected representatives, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is preparing
to begin Phase 1 of the cleanup of toxic contatnination at the site this summer. Anticipating
the potential for use of the buildings and/or restoration of the site, the District has
commissioned the enclosed preliminary study of the buildings and infrastructure. Before
proceeding with any further studies or decisions, the District intends to publicize the
availability of this study and solicit interest in the use of the facilities. Based on your
previous interest, we wanted to offer San Jose State University the first opportunity to
respond. Attachment A in the enclosed Board Report summarizes the further studies that are
anticipated to evaluate proposals for use of the buildings. Depending on the type of use that
is proposed, the proposer will be asked what studies, if any, they would require and how
such studies might be funded. Other studies are also likely to be necessary in response to
various specific use alternatives. ,
Please contact me if you would like to proceed to the next stage in evaluating the potential
use of these facilities for a retreat and seminar facility, or if you have questions about the
enclosed materials or the proposal process. Regardless of whether we hear from you, we
will send you the formal request for proposals and public meeting announcement we intend to
publicize later this year. Response to the formal announcement will be the final opportunity
to propose alternative uses of the facilities before the District Board of Directors determines
their appropriate disposition.
jinceely,
L. raig Britton
General Manager
I Enclosure
cc: Board of Directors, MROSD
330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485
Board of Oirec tors:Pete Siemens,Robert M(Kibbin,Teena I lensham,Ginny Rabbi It,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
(;metalAMmi;el A (',I it"F3rit[oil
T
Open Space
2 I
� I
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
June 1, 1994
I
Honorable Margaret Bruno
Mayor, City Los Altos
One North San Antonio Road
Los Altos, CA 94022
Dear Mayor Bruno:
On behalf of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, I'd like to express our strong
support for the Stevens Creek Trail Project and the Friends of the Stevens Creek Trail. The District's
Board of Directors has already passed a resolution of support, dated November 17, 1993 (copy attached).
Our regional community is an exceptional place to live largely because of the balance between
urban development and diverse open space. Stevens Creek, in the very heart of this community, is a
unique resource which links hundreds of acres of existing open space and affords crucial wildlife habitat.
It provides an excellent opportunity for an unbroken pathway from the Bay Trail to the Bay Area Ridge
Trail, the only potential connection in Santa Clara County, and will thus create additional public access
to open space recreational areas. This opportunity to provide a continuous creekside trail should not be
missed.
I urge you to support the Stevens Creek Trail project and to take into account the benefits that
will accrue not only to the trail-users of today, but to those of tomorrow and the generations beyond.
Sincerely,
Ginny Babbitt, President
Board of Directors
GBlmcs
cc: Board of Directors, MROSD
Los Altos City Council
Los Altos Parks and Recreation Commission
Rhonda Scherber
330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 • Phone: 415-691-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Han ko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
General Manager:L.Craig Britton
caa)7 cf4ov '-
z,
IiYZ�
� -
n
/YL .
4
CL
7L a ��
c U414
G
Csa� c
/9
r
Open Space
--------------
..
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
For Immediate Release Contact: Malcolm Smith
May 27, 1994 Public Affairs Manager
Randy Anderson
Planning Manager
(415) 691-1200
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARING
ABOUT OPEN_!JPACE PREsERvE NEAR Los GATOS
Los Altos, CA-- The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District invites the community to attend a
public hearing to review and discuss proposed plans for the St. Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve. This 267-
acre preserve, owned and managed for the public by Open Space District, is located in the hills directly south of
the Town of Los Gatos. The hearing will be held at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday,June 8, 1994 at the District
office,330 Distel Circle,Los Altos.
The District's plan for the St. Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve includes recommendations for two new
multi-use trails, realignment of three steep,rutted sections of existing trail, and reopening of the historic Jones
Trail. It also recommends that a portion of the preserve be used by Caltrans as an oak woodland restoration site
as part of the mitigation for the proposed Route 17 interchange project at Bear Creek Road.
This public hearing is part of the Comprehensive Use and Management Plan process that the District
uses as a planning tool for all of its preserves. A Use and Management Plan is prepared for each preserve when
it is acquired,and describes a preserve's conditions, sensitive resources, and potential hazards, and designates
access on existing roads and trails as appropriate. The District then revisits the plan for each preserve in detail,to
identify opportunities for new trails,parking areas,restrooms,and needs for special management or restoration
actions. The Use and Management Plan for the St. Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve was last reviewed in 1987.
(more)
330 Distel Circle ' Los Altos, California 94022-1404 • Phone: 415-691-1200 * FAX: 415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Han ko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
Genera!Manager:L.Craig Britton
Upon public review and comment on this plan,the District's Board of Directors will consider tentative
approval. Final adoption occurs at a later date after a specified period of time to allow for additional public
comment. Copies of the plan are available at the District office, or by calling the District at(415) 691-1200.
The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, extending from the Town of Los Gatos to the City of San
Carlos, is a public agency which owns and manages over 36,000 acres of diverse open space in 23 open space
preserves.
Funding is provided by a small share of the annual total property tax revenues collected within District
boundaries. District lands provide permanently protected wildlife habitat, natural resources,watershed, and a
variety of ecosystems, and are available for passive recreational use by the public. The District's goal is to acquire a
continuous greenbelt of protected open space lands for public use and enjoyment. There are approximately 20,000
- 30,000 acres of land still at risk of being lost to development within the District's planning area.
The District is divided into seven geographic wards,each represented for a four year term by an elected
Board member. The Board holds public meetings on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 7:30
p.m.,at the District offices.
i
385 Solana Drive
Los Altos,CA 94022
May 25, 1994
Ginny Babbitt,President
Board of Directors
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
330 Distel Circle
Los Altos,California 94022-1404
Dear Ginny,
Chet and I want to thank you,Craig Britton, and the Open Space District for the
tour of the open space lands on Saturday,May 14. We had a wonderful time and
found the tour to be quite informative. It definitely made us want to do some
more exploration,especially during the springtime.
Lunch at the Pichetti Ranch was great. We enjoyed seeing the improvements that
have been made since we last visited. It was nice to talk with other tour members
and watch the peacocks walking about.
We wholeheartedly support you and all that you stand for one-hundred percent!
How fortunate peninsulans are to have you working in our behalf.
Sincerely,
Pat Frankenfield
_ � e_ �.._
i
i
i
I
III
i
May 25,1994 04:39PM FROM TO 914156910485 P.M
STATE CH;CALVCM1A PEYE WIL",ftvs7w
SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
THIMY VAN NESS AVENUE,SUITE 2oi i
UA FRANCISM.CAUFOF"A S4 i C24M
May 13, 1994
Mike Ma&kt,chief,r-xwmW Affaus
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Ames Research Center
Moffett Field,California 94036-1000
SUBJECT: Moffett Field Comptthensive Use Plan, BCDC
Consistency Determination No. CN 7-94
D=Mr.Martaire
We have received the documentation submitted on behalf of NASA by Sandy 011iges,
EnvironnicrItal Program Manager,for NASA's consistency Determination No.ICN 7-90 the CD),
the Comprehensive Use Plan for Moffett Field,as well as a draft of your letter to=descfibin4
NASA's support for the proposed"Northern Alignment-of the Bay Trail-I am writing at this imm
to convey to you that the BCDC staff does not believe it can recommend concurrence with the,CD
to our Commission unless NASA incorporates a distinct and achievable public access component.
Under the Commission's law,the McAteer-Petris Act, and the San Francisco Bay Plan,the
Commission can authorize projects around San Francisco Bay only if they provide for the
"maximum feasible public access consistent with the project."In the case.of the Comprehensive
Use Plan,we do not believe that the alternative alignment proposed by NASA provides for the
"nmximum feasible"access to the Bay,Instead,your letter states that NASA will"examine a
solution for implementation of the northern alignment"with a proposed working group including
NASA,other agencies and the Say Trail Ad Hoc Committee. Nevertheless,it does not mate that
NASA will indeed implement a northern alignment of the Trail,despite the Navy's prior
commitment to this alignment.We Wien that it is essential to receive such a commitment in the
Plan and in the CD in order to recommend concurrence to our Comrnission.Without such a
commitment,the transfer of Moffett Field to NASA could actually reduce the potential of providing
public access to and along the Bay,as represented by a northern alignment of the Bay Trail.
Tbemfom,in order to proceed expeditiously with the Commission's approval of Comprehensive
Use Plan,we,request a letter indicating that NASA will revise the Plan and CD to implement a
northern alignment of the trail.
In addition,under the Coastal Zone Management Act we must act on NASA's dewmaination
within 45 days of receipt,which,in this case,is May 23. 1994.As we have yet to receive all of the
infbnnation we need for the CD,and the project must be listed with our Commission prior to
acting on it,we hereby request 15 additional days,as provided for in the Coastal Zone
Management Act,to act on the CD.
Dedicated to smoking San Frurwiwo Day better,
May 25,1994 04:40PPI F�Um TO 911415E910485 P.04
Milo Matlaire,Chef,External Affairs
May 13. 1W4
Page 2
If you have any questlot)s or would like to discuss this matter further,please call.
Sincerely,
RICHARD L.COOPER
RLrjmm Coastal Ptogram Analyst
cc: Association of Bay Area Governments,Attn:Jill Keitnach
NASA,Attn:Sandy 011iges
NASA,Attn.Kathlren Kovvar
f
i
TOTAL P.04
- _ __
_ _ _ _
j t•` `x I
I
I
i
i
i
i
I
i
I
i
IJ
Harry H. "acusol -r , 7r.
1094 Highland Circle
Los Altos, CA 9,"124
May 25A 1994
Editor
San Jose Mercury Nears �
750 Ridder Drive
San Jose, CA 95190
Last April 14, Therese Iknoian wrote a column in your paper
on s'`raring of mountain brails . At the ti-ne u;han I read the
column, I was impressed with her plain. .poker reasoning that
the best way for everyone on the trr.'ils to really enjoy the
trails is toe "share the trails" .
By this I am sure that she meant we all :;rust be considerate
of and h?Zrful to otba rs.
We in this area have been fortunate in thAt a responsible
grou-o of :�icycZe riders have t3 ,en the ?e- c3 in promoting
good conduct on the part of bicycla ridars' on the tails
available to them. As a rssult, there have been very few
acciOents, discour'ueous occurrences and hard feelings
between trails users in this area, as compared to the i
problems, antagonisms and other dzfficultles experienced in
Marin County.
Cooperation, courtesy, friendlinc,ss and shar`l.ng, as Ms I
Iknoian irndlies, will be our trail users saltation.
� A
Harry H. Haeussler, Jr.
I
k
1
y .
I '
i
i
i APRIL 14, 1994
inn 30se Amurg dews
I -
'P
ERSONALLY,I hope those
cops on bikes are also NE OF the leading bicycle
looking for the bikers on manufacturers,Trek,has
0 some 2,000 bicycles
^ trails where they aren't supposed rolling off the assembly line
be.
to this time f year. Most
' Picking my wav not too long every day t s t o ye
:ago down a narrow,winding trail of those are intended for off-road
thickly lined with trees,I had to use.So that means there are more
THERESE IKNOIAN hop over a log and pull myself out bicyclists out there all the time.
of the way of two bikers racing As a fan of cycling,I love the
surge in interest. As a former
down the path. And this was a resident of Europe,my bicycle
Slow down! bicycles verboten area! was m best friend and m only
Let's be reasonable here in our mode of transport. Cycling is y
arguments against the radar
g health friendly to the
Mountain trails nabbing folks for sliding a mile patrol.They will certainly not be y, y
environment and a great way to
commute.
per hour or so over the 15 mph I, for one, hope we don't have
can be shared speed limit.It doesn't happen on to follow the lead of the Marin
the roads. and I know it won't Municipal Water District.There,
happen on the trails. reckless cyclists who haven't
aybe I'm just naive,but In one recent letter to the editor y
I'm having a difficult 'in the Mercury News,the writer paid tickets could have their
time understanding the complained he would be forced to wheels impounded. It would be
hullabaloo about cracking down drop$50 on a speedometer.It unfortunate for the situation to
on speeding mountain bikers. would be dangerous,he asserted, disintegrate to that point.
If everyone—hiker, to have one eye on the dial all the This is not an anti-bikes issue,
equestrian or biker—is time.This is absurd.A pitting hikers and equestrians
considerate of others trying to comfortable,cruising speed of 15 against bikers.This is an
enjoy the trails,then rules about mph is not hard to feel.If bikers anti-rude issue,pitting the
speeds and behavior shouldn't are good enough to be on the hills, I inconsiderate clods against the
and wouldn't be a concern. the should be skilled enough to considerate. Reckless wonders on
y wheels could ruin trail access for
Unfortunately,once again, I
have a good idea whether they're . other bikers. �
expect it's a handful of going 15 mph or 25 mph.
knuckleheads on wheels that are g g The only hope is that bikers
Think about it:Once you ve police each other.If you're on the
ruining life for thousands of driven a car for a short time,youails on a bike and someone is
thoughtful citizens. don't have to keep your eyes speeding ask them,as one
-., Although I,too,would rather glued to the speedometer to know bike-lover to another,to please
not have cops on bikes in the how fast you're going.A 15=mph obey the rules. Your recreation is
hills,if that's what it takes to speed through residential areas also on the line.
slow down the crazies,then go to becomes natural,as does 35 mph
it. Way too many times,I've been in business zones.
scared out of my shoes by some
biker shooting past me.
Even on the trails in the
flatlands,my heart-rate monitor
has recorded a few vicious spikes
in pulse as a cyclist rocketed past
without warning.This is simply
rude and unfair to others looking
to enjoy their own style of
recreation.
I
l
I
f
Open Space
1
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
i
i
I li
� I
May 27, 1994
I'
i
Mr. Larry MacMillan
President, Board of Directors
Trail Center
3921 E. Bayshore Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Dear Mr. MacMillan:
I
On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, it's my
I
pleasure to provide you with this resolution honoring the "Trail Center on its tenth anniversary.
I
The work of the 'Trail Center over the last ten years has been invaluable to not only the District,
but to the entire region and all of its inhabitants as well. We look forward to continuing our good
relationship with the Trail Center, and to working with you on issues and projects of mutual importance.
I
I
Congratulations on your tenth anniversary! We at the District wish you all the best, along with
our hope for many, many more years of your important work.
I
Sin
i
L. Craig Britton
General Manager `
i
i
LCB/mcs
I
cc: Board of Directors
i
i
- i
I
I
I
330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485
&amyl ofOirectnrs:Pele Siemens,Rohert McKibbin, Ieena I lenshaw,(pinny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
General hldndf;er:I.( iaig Britton
I
i
May 25,1994 4':38PM FROM TO 9i4i569104EIS P.02
OPINIONS
t�
'mr WE
i�,t 1"• :�i�::" /�, ilk;' �� '' � � 1 ��! 1`~.
Ay
M ,• ��'���`-� tie; � +"+' _ •:�' '�;
-- - -- -fir-�
Open Space
--------------------
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: C. Britton, General Manager
DATE: June 8, 1994
SUBJECT: FYI
W
r
• I
I
330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 FAX:415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
Genera(Manager:L.Craig Britton
n
Santa Clara Valley ASPA 1994 Awards
Come congratulate our winners!
Outstanding Public Administrator:
Michael P. Garvey
City Manager, San Carlos
Outstanding Public Program:
"Kids Art in Open Spaces"
Midpeninsula Open Space District
Honorable Mention: Envimnment
Mary Ellen Dick
City of San Jos6
Honorable Mention:Academics
Dr. Ron Sylvia
San Jos6 State University
Honorable Mention: Administration
Larry Moore
City of Milpitas
Honorable Mention: Environment
"You Have A Place In Open Space"
Midpeninsula Open Space District
Honorable Mention: Public Safety
"Hillside Fire Safety Task Force"
City of Saratoga
Honorable Mention: Public Management
Volunteer Program of Los Gatos
Palermo Ristorand
2nd and San Salvadore, San Josi
June 16, 5:30-730
heavy hors d'oeuvres and soft drinks RSVP to Robyn Joseph
$20 per person 408-277-4595
no host bar Reservations by June 14
Open Space
P !�
s
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
June 3, 1994
Department of the Army
U.S. Army Engineer District, Sacramento
Corps of Engineers
1325 J Street
Sacramento, CA 95814-2922
Attn: Michael R. Bain
Chief, Acquisition Branch
Real Estate Division
Subject: Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve - Mt. Umunhum Area Access Entry Permit.
(Your Contract No. DACA05-9-94-170)
Dear People:
As requested by your letter of May 12, 1994, I have signed and enclosed the original and
one copy of the Access Agreement for Construction of Formerly Used Defense Sites. Please
return a fully executed copy to my attention after it has been executed by your Contracting
Officer.
After discussing this matter with both Jody Meredith and Brenda Pedersen of your office, I
was able to work out an agreement with Mr. McQueen (through his attorney, Robert Logan)
to secure access to lit. Thayer. I hope this will help in obtaining the necessary entry permit
to complete the cleanup of Mt. Thayer as well.
S lY
L. aig Britton �-
General Manager
Enclosures
cc: Board of Directors, MROSD
Sue Schetman, Esq.
I
330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 FAX:415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
General Manager:L.Craig Britton
I
i
Open Space piil
-----------------------
June 3, 1994 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
Robert J. Logan, Esq.
The Law Offices of Robert J. Logan
152 North Third Street, Suite 301
San Jose, CA 95112
Re: Mt. Umunhum Use and Ownership Issues
Dear Mr. Logan:
On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, I would
like to respond to your letter of May 25, 1994. While I cannot assure you and your client, Mr.
Loren McQueen, that the District will not pursue establishment of communication facilities at
Mt. Umunhum, there are no specific efforts or discussions currently underway. As a public
agency, we have a responsibility to pursue all reasonable opportunities for compatible revenue
sources; however, we understand Mr. McQueen's concerns about possible competition and the
District will fully inform and coordinate with him (and you) on any such proposed action. In
fact, the District and Mr. McQueen have many mutual opportunities associated with our
respective land holdings and staff will make it a priority to work directly with you and Mr.
McQueen on these matters. `
The current stage of study of the site and the efforts of the Corps of Engineers to complete the
toxic cleanup should be of importance to Mr. McQueen as well as the District. Opportunities
for communications leases are not contingent on or directly furthered by these studies. The
_ District is currently -studying the potential for all of the buildings on the site and we hope Mr.
McQueen will cooperate in allowing District access. As for current access, we understand that
the Corps of Engineers is in the process of arranging for their needs and will simply drop
cleanup of the Mt. Thayer site if they cannot obtain permission to cross Mr. McQueen's
property. We hope that he will cooperate with the Corps, as we will all benefit from the success
o the P project.
f h cleanup ro'ect.
During the next phase of study the District will investigate your assertion that a water tank and
land reverted back to Mr. McQueen upon the Air Forces's departure. It would be very helpful
if you would provide any available maps or documents that clarify this.
We will be sure that you are on the mailing list for information and meetings about this subject.
i
Sincerely,
I
Ginny Ba tt, President
Board of irectors
cc: Board of Directors, MROSD,
330 Distel Circle • Los'Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485 ®'
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
Genera!Manager:L.Craig Britton
mlvPC-NIN3-Clj.�1 OPeN�p%qce 91,.5TPIcr
330 fl,STeb CIRCbC-
L,OQ.')%1IDT045,C1194022-1404
V'TTN,JO-Nhi yOUN(i
Jumz21994
'v-nr Joan
his I pullvd thv-truck into thi-76kgfinvz 1 angvzr Offieiz eorpgard latsz this aftmoon thv-0S
Tizehniejan8 wvriz just Afzttin8 off work.))atriek and thiz 0,$Ts had a eizi-tain Alint in their zyz8,likiz
thv-g knizw a 8"nzt that I did'nt know.I should haw-, known thing wizriz up to 6omv-thin8. In a minutizz
oniz of thv-m appv-nrvd with a gri,7at bib box with mg nnmv-on it.Was szvvzr,5urpri8jzdl!
I'm rizal 8orrg I mix38tzd thsz"Chizvzr8 for Voluntvqzr,5"party last wizfzk go you could 8szvz ftz
look on mg faci? and 5izvz,how p4zand I am with thin bizautiful all-wizatha jaekvzt.It's just Nz ri8ht
8izv-and also color for a 8rq-,izn-vgizd man. I'll izn)og it this*ummizr in thin fli8h 5-!vrra to ward off
thin chill and wi;ztnv-,s8 of thv-aftizrnoon thunda 8howvrg.
I fizizl it is a 8rvat priviliz, fa to biz allowizd to work on 9i8trjet trails,and timZ8 workin8 with
Skqlimz staff from timv,to timi?,is anz spv-eial momvntg for mv-.I am thrilled that I havv-gottvn to
rv,work two diffvrvnt links of Nz 13ag%qrv-n Rid,�i Trail;I'vv,szwn gotkzn to h0p with thiz nvw
Norton link..
I sag "CNa-3 for Tbv,(Di8triet Staff-for thizir pativneiz and food attitudiz and "CNuzr8 for
Thjz Voluntvzizr Program"for hizlpin�miz rv-ach 8omjz of mg 8oal.5.
Mang thanks for v-w-rgthin�, ineludin8 thin nv-nto Midpv-n tiv,pin .
Sincjzrv,lg,
13o Gimbal
I
i
i
Arthur M. Mintz
Attorney at Law
50 Fox Hill
Woodside, California 94062
(415) 851-1883 Res.
(415) 851-1909 Off.
(415) 851-3166 Fax
June 1, 1994
Mid-Peninsula Open Space District Peninsula Open Space Trust
330 Distel Circle 3000 Sand Hill Road
Los Altos, CA. 94022 Menlo Park, CA. 94028
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
SUBJECT: WOODSIDE TRAIL CLUB - PHLEGER ESTATE TRAILS
Please be advised that I am one of the Board of Directors of the Woodside Trail
Club as well as one of its legal consultants. During a recent meeting at the end
of April, the Board became informed of circumstances existing at the Phleger
Estate which creates serious concern .
It appears that bicyclists are taking control of the equestrian trails in the
former Phleger Estate, making the trails dangerous for horsemen. Cyclists
enter the trails from Skyline, either by simply lifting their bikes over the
fence, or riding around the end of the fenceline, then going down the hill
trails, over jumps they have constructed and out via the watershed open south
end, or via Richards Road in Huddart Park, or down the Phleger road and over
the fence.
Because the area in question is now public property, rather than private, the
Woodside Trail Club herebyadvises you that it does not accept an
Y P Y
responsibility maintenance , posting o upkeep of t s.
pon bility for the main enanc , p sing r pk p hose trail
Accordingly, by this letter, you are formally advised and put on notice that the
Woodside Trail Club disassociates itself from any and all obligations to maintain
trails in the entire area north of the border of Huddart Park.
We do not wish to appear inflexible , and will, of course, continue to cooperate
in any way reasonable to advance the best interests of the Phleger property so
that it can be enjoyed by the entire community. Please don't hesitate to call me
if you would like to discuss this matter in greater detail.
Sincerely,
ARTHUR M. MINTZ
AMM/pk )
Open Space
s
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
May 27, 1994
Rick Gumz, Staff Services Manager
California Transportation Commission
1120 N Street
P.O. Box 942873
Sacramento, CA 94273
Subject: Response to proposed reduction in funding for
Sierra Azul Resource Lands Project (application #99)
Dear Mr. Gumz:
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District's Sierra Azul
Resource Lands Project was listed as a recommended
project in the 1994-95 grant cycle of the Environmental
Enhancement and Mitigation Program. The original
application was for $500, 000, with the District
contributing $784 , 940 in matching funds and in-kind
services. The project has been recommended for funding
at the level of $340, 000. The purpose of this letter is
to describe how the District will modify the project if
the funding is reduced to $340, 000.
The project originally involved acquisition of four
parcels totaling 209 acres in two canyons east of
Lexington Reservoir to protect oak woodland and riparian
habitat from development. The project also included
development of two small staging areas (one in each
canyon) and associated trails.
r
We propose to phase the project by acquiring two of the
four parcels and developing one of the proposed staging
areas and associated trails at this time. Acquisition of
the 69-acre Hogan property in Limekiln Canyon is
important to P P
a t protect the Limekiln Creek riparian corridor
P
and to develop trail connections between St. Joseph' s
Hill and Sierra Azul Open Space Preserves and Lexington
Reservoir County Park. The Hogan property also includes
a house that the District could use as a ranger
residence. This will provide greater patrol presence in
the area, commensurate with increased use.
of the remaining parcels, the 63-acre Liles property is
the most critical acquisition. The largest of the three,
it protects the most riparian habitat. It also has the
best site for the other proposed staging area and links
up with existing District trails.
I
330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 94022-1404 • Phone: 41.5-691-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485
Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko, Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit
I General Manager:L.Craig Britton ,
1
Page 2
Although the District is amending the project scope to
accomplish it in phases due to the reduced funding, we
are committed to complete the entire project. If
Proposition 180 passes on the June ballot, the District
may be able to acquire the two remaining parcels soon.
If not, we will apply for other grant funds. . Acquisition
of the Liles parcel will enable us to proceed with plans
for the second staging area.
Attached is a marked-up copy of the project cost
estimate, detailing the amendments, and a map
highlighting the proposed current phase. The revised
project costs total $781, 020, with the grant supplying
$340, 000 and the District contributing $441, 020 . This is
a similar ratio to our original proposal.
The District believes that this phase retains most of the
habitat benefits of the entire project, as well as the
public recreational benefits. Our overall intent is not
to limit the project, but to postpone the less critical
elements. Please call me if you have questions at (415)
691-1200. Thank you for your consideration of the Sierra
Azul Resource Lands project.
Sincerely,
Randy Anderson
Planning Manager
cc. Derek Pool, Caltrans
I
I
I
I
i
i
Claims No. 94-11
Meeting 94-17
Date: June 8, 1994
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
# Amount Name Description
5961 375.00 Aaron's Septic Tank Service Sanitation Services
5962 75.72 *1 All Laser Service Office Supplies
5963 200.26 Allen Equipment Company, Inc. Field Supplies
5964 62.80 Artech Laminating Planning Supplies
5965 207.04 AT&T Telephone Maintenance Agreement
5966 1,200.00 Geoff Ball & Associates Professional Services
5967 151.55 Best Sanitation Sanitation Services
5968 339.79 Bimark, Inc. Volunteer Recognition Supplies
5969 105.82 Biosafety Systems First Aid Field Supplies
5970 46.25 Black Mountain Spring Water Water Service
5971 142.17 California Chamber of Commerce Resource Material
5972 1.7.00 *2 California Dept. of Food & Agriculture Resource Material �
5973 40.00 *3 California Dept. of Pest Regulation Permit
5974 45.62 California Water Service Company Water Service
5975 162.06 Annette Coleman Reimbursement-Field Supplies & Repair
5976 37.89 Contemporary Engraving Company, Inc. Volunteer & Docent Badges
5977 65.00 Steve Covarrubias Reimbursement-Boot Repair
5978 357.06 David B. Fisher Legal Services
5979 11.56 Foster Bros. Security Systems, Inc. Keys & Key Rings
5980 67.77 GI Trucking Company Freight
5981 20.49 G & K Services Shop Towel Service
5982 81.80 Mary Gundert Reimbursement-Private Vehicle
5983 2,023.80 HMH, Inc. Development Feasibility Report
5984 54.49 Home Depot Field Supplies
5985 219.00 Honeywell, Inc. Alarm System Maintenance
5986 1,457.50 Huettig & Schromm, Inc. Construction Management Services
5987 185.70 Hyster Sales Company Vehicle Repair
5988 295.79 Independent Business Products Printer Supplies
5989 147.22 Interstate Traffic Control Signs
5990 155.88 Travis Jensen Reimbursement-Vehicles Supplies
5991 34.74 Keeble & Shuchat Photography Photographic Supplies& Processing
5992 152.18 *4 Kinko's - Mountain View Printing-Volunteer Newsletter
5993 309.89 Konica Business Machines Service Agreement & Supplies
5994 48.39 Langley Hill Quarry Base Rock
5995 1,311.49 Lanier Worldwide, Inc. Copier Lease
5996 120.00 The Last Detail Brochure Proofing
5997 85.00 Judy Law Reimbursement-Training
5998 2,125.00 Levinson Associates Training
5999 480.00 Lodes Tree Service Tree Pruning
6000 285.42 Los Altos Garbage Co. Dumpster Rental
6001 4,090.46 Bucky Mace Consulting Services
I
6002 235.00 Mailing List Resources Mailing List& Labels
I
I
*1 Urgent check issued on May 27, 1994
*2 Urgent check issued on May 26, 1994
*3 Urgent check issued on May 26, 1994
*4 Urgent check issued on June 1, 1994
Claims No. 94-11 40
Meeting 94-17
June 8, 1994
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
# Amount Name Description
6003 128.60 Marin Supply Company Sanitation Supplies
6004 857.19 Miracle Auto Painting Vehicle Repair
6005 337.74 Monogram Sanitation Sanitation Supplies
6006 12.76 National Interagency Fire Center Fire Fighting Equipment
6007 2,363.79 *5 National Mailing Services, Inc. Postage—Annual Report
6008 46.19 Northern Energy Propane Fuel
6009 198.03 Pacific Bell Telephone Service
6010 200.00 Palo Alto Police Department Radar Training
1=9
6011 88.41 Peninsula Blueprint, Inc. Bluelines
6012 55.00 Personnel News Subscription
6013 279.55 Pitney Bowes Inc. Meter Rental
6014 1,595.61 Quick Silver Printing Printing
6015 156.08 REI Uniform Supplies
6016 437.82 Rich's Tire Service Tire Repair—District Vehicles
6017 150.00 Ane Rovetta Docent Training
6018 1,219.68 Roy's Repair Service Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs
6019 125.12 David Sanguinetti Reimbursement—Field Supplies
6020 494.42 San Jose Blueprint Service& Supply Bluelines
6021 2,206.40 Santa Clara County Sheriffs Department Patrol Services
6022 135.44 Signs of the Times Signs
6023 99.00 SkillPath, Inc. Workshop
6024 784.15 Smith Equipment Field Equipment Repairs
6025 1,659.05 Jana Sokale Consulting Services
6026 225.00 Sonoma State University Foundation, Inc. Archaeological Record Search
6027 433.00 Sunrise Winery Volunteer Recognition Event
6028 97.82 TransCom Corporation Radio Repair
6029 5.00 Trust for Public Land Resource Paper
6030 86.00 *6 University of California Regents Resource Material
6031 108.21 Unocal Fuel
6032 72.78 Vallen Safety Supply Company Uniform Supplies
6033 130.00 West Valley College Training
6034 480.09 Workingman's Emporium Uniform Supplies
6035 392.65 Yardbird Equipment Sales Field Supplies
*5 Urgent check issued on May 25, 1994
*6 Urgent check issued on May 26, 1994
- - - - - - - - ------
Claims No. 94-11
Meeting 94-17
Date: June 8, 1994
REVISED
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
# Amount Name Description
5961 375.00 Aaron's Septic Tank Service Sanitation Services
5962 75.72 *1 All Laser Service Office Supplies
5963 200.26 Allen Equipment Company, Inc. Field Supplies
5964 62.80 Artech Laminating Planning Supplies
5965 207.04 AT&T Telephone Maintenance Agreement
5966 1,200.00 Geoff Ball & Associates Professional Services
5967 151.55 Best Sanitation Sanitation Services
5968 339.79 Bimark, Inc. Volunteer Recognition Supplies
5969 105.82 Biosafety Systems First Aid Field Supplies
5970 46.25 Black Mountain Spring Water Water Service
5971 142.17 California Chamber of Commerce Resource Material
5972 17.00 *2 California Dept. of Food & Agriculture Resource Material
5973 40.00 *3 California Dept. of Pest Regulation Permit
5974 45.62 California Water Service Company Water Service
5975 162.06 Annette Coleman Reimbursement-Field Supplies&Repair
5976 37.89 Contemporary Engraving Company, Inc. Volunteer&Docent Badges
5977 65.00 Steve Covarrubias Reimbursement-Boot Repair
5978 357.06 David B. Fisher Legal Services
5979 11.56 Foster Bros. Security Systems, Inc. Keys & Key Rings
5980 67.77 GI Trucking Company Freight
CAR 20.49 G & K Services Shop Towel Service
2 81.80 Mary Gundert Reimbursement-Private Vehicle
5983 2,023.80 HMH, Inc. Development Feasibility Report
5984 54.49 Home Depot Field Supplies
5985 219.00 Honeywell, Inc. Alarm System Maintenance
5986 1,457.50 Huettig & Schromm, Inc. Construction Management Services
5987 185.70 Hyster Sales Company Vehicle Repair
5988 295.79 Independent Business Products Printer Supplies
5989 147.22 Interstate Traffic Control Signs
5990 155.88 Travis Jensen Reimbursement-Vehicles Supplies
5991 34.74 Keeble & Shuchat Photography Photographic Supplies &Processing
5992 152.18 *4 Kinko's - Mountain View Printing-Veluntez' PTa„��?after
5993 309.89 Konica Business Machines Service AgrwnPr; & Supn i%,
'I
5994 48.39 Langley Hill Quarry Base Rock
5995 1,311.49 Lanier Worldwide, Inc. Copier Lease
5996 120.00 The Last Detail Brochure Proofing
5997 85.00 Judy Law Reimbursement-Training
5998 2,125.00 Levinson Associates Training
5999 480.00 Lodes Tree Service Tree Pruning
6000 285.42 Los Altos Garbage Co. Dumpster Rental
6001 4,090.46 Bucky Mace Consulting Services
6002 235.00 Mailing List Resources Mailing List& Labels
*1 Urgent check issued on May 27, 1994
*2 Urgent check issued on May 26, 1994
*3 Urgent check issued on May 26, 1994
*4 Urgent check issued on June 1, 1994
Claims No. 94-11
Meeting 94-17
June 8, 1994
REVISED
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
# Amount Name Description
6003 128.60 Marin Supply Company Sanitation Supplies
6004 857.19 Miracle Auto Painting Vehicle Repair
6005 337.74 Monogram Sanitation Sanitation Supplies
6006 12.76 National Interagency Fire Center Fire Fighting Equipment
6007 2,363.79 *5 National Mailing Services, Inc. Postage—Annual Report
6008 46.19 Northern Energy Propane Fuel
6009 216.95 Pacific Bell Telephone Service
6010 200.00 Palo Alto Police Department Radar Training
6011 88.41 Peninsula Blueprint, Inc. Bluelines
6012 55.00 Personnel News Subscription
6013 279.55 Pitney Bowes Inc. Meter Rental
6014 1,595.61 Quick Silver Printing Printing
6015 156.08 REI Uniform Supplies
6016 437.82 Rich's Tire Ser-qice Tire Repair—District Vehicles
6017 150.00 Ane Rovetta Docent Training
6018 1,219.68 Roy's Repair Service Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs
6019 125.12 David Sanguinetti Reimbursement—Field Supplies
6020 494.42 San Jose Blueprint Service& Supply Bluelines,
--11 2,206.40 Santa Clara County Sheriffs Department Patrol Services
2 135.44 Signs of the Times Signs
6023 99.00 SkillPath, Inc. Workshop
6024 784.15 Smith Equipment Field Equipment Repairs
6025 1,659.05 Jana Sokale Consulting Services
6026 225.00 Sonoma State University Foundation, Inc. Archaeological Record Search
6027 433.00 Sunrise Winery Volunteer Recognition Event
6028 97.82 TransCom Corporation Radio Repair
6029 5.00 Trust for Public Land Resource Paper
6030 86.00 *6 University of California Regents Resource Material
6031 108.21 Unocal Fuel
6032 72.78 Vallen Safety Supply Company Uniform Supplies
6033 130.00 West Valley College Training
6034 480.09 Workingman's Emporium Uniform Supplies
6035 392.65 Yardbird Equipment Sales Field Supplies
6036 559.14 Petty Cash Office & Field Supplies; Maps;
Local & Out-of-Town Meeting Expense;
Docent and Volunteer Expense; and Private
Vehicle Expense
*5 Urgent check issued on May 25, 1994
*6 Urgent check issued on May 26, 1994