Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout19940622 - Agendas Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 94-18 Open ,space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Meeting 94-18 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA* 7:30 P.M. 330 Distel Circle Wednesday Los Altos, California June 22, 1994 (7:30) ROLL CALL ** ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -- Public 8 ADOPTION OF AGENDA *** ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR -- P. Siemens *** APPROVAL OF MINUS I May 25, 1994 (Consent Item) June 8, 1994 (Consent Item) *** WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (Consent Item) BOARD BUSINESS (7:45) 1. Presentation on GIS Computer Mapping Research and Development -- R. Anderson (8:15) - 2. Adjustment of Ward 6 Boundaries to Incorporate Lands Annexed to the District, Calling of District Elections in Wards 1, 2, 5, and 6 and Requests for Election Consolidation Services from Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Santa Cruz Counties -- J. Fiddes Resolution Amending Existing Ward Boundaries for Ward 6 Resolution Calling Election and Requesting Election Consolidation Services - Santa Clara County for Wards 1, 2 and 5 Resolution Calling Election and Requesting Election Consolidation Services - San Mateo County for Wards 5 and 6 Resolution Calling Election and Requesting Election Consolidation Services - Santa Cruz County for Ward 2 *** 3. Scheduling of July 7 Special Meeting with San Mateo County Parks and Recreations Commission -- C. Britton 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022-1404 • Phone: 415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485 19 Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit General Manager:L.Craig Britton (8:20) 4. Request for Authorization to Allow California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to Conduct a Fifty Acre Controlled Bum at Monte Bello Open Space Preserve -- J. Escobar (8:25) INFORMATIONAL REPORTS -- Directors and Staff REVISED CLAIMS Consent Item) CLOSED SESSION - None Scheduled ADJOURNMENT *NOTE: Times are estimated and items may appear earlier or later than listed. Agenda is subject to change of order. TO ADDRESS THE BOARD: The Chair will invite public comment on agenda items at then time each item is considered by the Board of Directors. You may address the Board concerning other matters during oral communications. Each speaker will ordinarily be limited to 3 minutes. Alternately, you may comment to the Board by a written communication, which the Board appreciates. All items on the consent calendar shall be approved without discussion by one motion unless a Board member removes an item from the consent calendar for separate discussion. A member of the Public may request under oral communications that an item be removed from the consent calendar. NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS The Legislative, Finance, and Public Affairs Committee will meet on Monday, June 27, 1994 at 3:00 P.M. at the District office. Open S � P Pace 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Meeting9 6 4-1 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS May 25, 1994 M]NUTES I. ROLL CALL President Ginny Babbitt called the meeting to order at 6:35 P.M. Members Present: Ginny Babbitt, Pete Siemens, Robert McKibbin, Betsy Crowder, Teena Henshaw, Nonette Hanko, and Wim de Wit. Personnel Present: L. Craig Britton, Jean Fiddes, Malcolm Smith, John Escobar, Randy Anderson, Sue Schectman, Terry Dunning, and Susan Dale. II. STUDY SESSION - Review of Areas of Agreement Regarding; District Policy. Goals and/or QbJectives Not Discussed at January 22 Goals and Objectives WorkshM (RRort R-94-61) The Board discussed the nine statements where there was general Board agreement to make certain that all Board members had interpreted the nine survey statements the same way. The Board reconfirmed their agreement on the following statements: B. The Di District should continue t ui suitable n Wage lands while a andin public access. H. The focus and direction n f the District's community li affairs is a=LcjLnate. i active role in regional o n ce issues. I. The District should continue is acts a e�_pe spa Discussion for the other statements included: A. The long_-term goals and objectives of the District are clear. Need to review long-term operations and planning plans in relationship to the strategic plan. Need to review objectives as part of the project to create a mission statement. The Board agreed to review the basic policy in conjunction with formation of the mission statement. 330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, ' ornia 94022-1404 • Phone: 415-691-' FAX: 415-691-0485 Board of Directors:Pete Siemens, McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt, Nonette Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit General Manager:L.Craig Britton I Meeting 94-16 Page 2 C. The District's maximum level of development should normally be limited to construction of trails, parking areas, and restrooms. "Normally" is a key word in the statement. Current wording precludes the Board from considering different types of development, such as buildings. It was recommended that the word "maximum" be deleted and replaced with the word "basic" and that the word "normally" be deleted so that the statement reads: The District's basic level of development should be limited to construction of trails parking areas. and restrooms. The Board agreed that using the word "basic" allows the opportunity for development beyond the elements of trails, parking areas, and restrooms. D. The District should expand its environmental education grogram to reach a majority of school-age children within the District. Discussion centered on the potential financial impact of expanding the District's environmental education program, and the impact on the overall goals and objectives. The statement had a direct relationship with the expansion of the District's interpretive program. It was noted that environmental education is appropriate for all ages and that the program should be expanded incrementally. The Board agreed to amend the statement to read: The District should expand its environmental education program eventually to reach a majority of school-age children within the District and within financial constraints. E. Acguiring�land in the Bay Trail and Ridge Trail corridors should be a high priority for the District. T. Henshaw noted that high priorities for the District may be different for individual Board g P Y members and that acquiring land, in general, may not be a top priority. It was noted that when moneyis tight, the Board may need to consider other acquisitions a higher priority Y �l g P h' than land in the Bay Trail and Ridge Trail corridors. F. The current pace of trail development is adequate. General consensus was that the current pace of trail development is adequate. Discussion centered around individual interpretation of "adequate", trail development for access purposes, and the pace of trail development being contingent upon District finances. N. Hanko stated that trail development is a high priority for her. P. Siemens stated that he felt overall trail development was good but access to particular preserves may be lagging, noting, however, that the current amount of District funds spent on trail development was appropriate. The need to utilize volunteers and funding from outside sources was I I Meeting g 94-16 Page 3 discussed, and well as trail development's impact on staffing and operations cost. G. The District should expand its interpretive etive programs. Discussion centered on the expansion of the docent program over the past few years and the evolution of the program over time. C. Britton noted that expansion of interpretive programs is not a current staff assignment at this time. The Board agreed to amend the statement to read as follows: The District should continue to expand its interpretive Mrograms as the need arises. President Babbitt called a recess at 7:26 F.M. and reconvened the meeting at 7:31 P.M. She announced that the Board had just completed a study session and that the regular meeting will begin with Special Orders of the Day followed by Oral Communications. III. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY A. Motion: B. Crowder moved that the Board adopt Resolution 94-20, a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Commending and Congratulating the Trail Center on its Tenth Anniversary. P. Siemens seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0. B. First graders, Benjamin Flamm and Cameron Taylor, and fifth grader Carolyn Faught from Duveneck Elementary School in Palo Alto made a presentation of their visit to Hidden Villa Ranch. G. Babbitt presented the students with District caps in appreciation of their presentation. IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Harry Haeussler, 1094 Highland Circle, Los Altos addressed the Board regarding: 1) status of paragliding at Windy Hill Open Space Preserve; 2) the descriptions used to announce the May 18 special workshop meeting; 3) his opinion that general manager evaluation criteria should not be discussed in closed session, but rather the public should be able to provide input on this item; and 4) using microphones during meetings. C. Britton responded that paragliding use will be discussed at the next regular Board meeting. G. Babbitt stated the purpose of the workshop was to discuss land preservation methods to preserve land from development. S. Schectman responded that the District is in compliance with the Brown Act and that the general manager's evaluation procedure continues to be proper. C. Britton introduced Terry Dunning, the District's new real property representative on a one- year contract basis. Meeting 94-16 Page 4 V. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Motion: R. McKibbin moved that the Board adopt the agenda. P. Siemens seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0. VI. ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: P. Siemens moved that the Board adopt the consent calendar including approval of the minutes of May 14, 1994 and revised claims 94-10. R. McKibbin seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0. J. Fiddes clarified that a written communication had been received too late to be included in the meeting packet, but had been distributed to the Board because it related to the Mt. Umunhum item on the agenda. Va. BOARD BUSINESS A. R=sed Addition of Faler Partial PropgM Interest to Sierra Azul QMn Space Preserve (R=rt R-94-62) C. Britton reported the Faler acquisition is the remaining 1/8 interest of the 35-acre Sciarrino property acquired by the District in,1989. He stated that the purchase price was $30,000 and that under the terms of the purchase agreement Mr. Faler will continue to have the use of a cabin and immediate surrounding grounds for one year. Motion: R. McKibbin moved that the Board adopt Resolution 94-21 a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Authorizing Acceptance of Purchase Agreement, Authorizing Officer to Execute Certificate of Acceptance of Quitclaim to District, and Authorizing General Manager to Execute Any and All Other Documents Necessary or Appropriate to Closing of the Transaction (Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve - Lands of Faler). T. Henshaw seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0. Motion: R. McKibbin moved that the Board reaffirm its adoption of the Preliminary Use and Management for the former Sciarrino property, adopt the revised recommendations in the staff report, including naming the Faler property as an addition to Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve, and reaffirm the Board's intention to withhold the property from dedication as public open space. T. Henshaw seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0. B. Mt. Umunhum Building and Infrastructure Assessment (R-e-Wrt R-94-64) R. Anderson showed slides of the structures and reported on issues concerning legal access, building use, asbestos removal, and toxic soil contamination. He said that in order to determine future use or demolition of the Mt. Umunhum site, significant issues need to be addressed and a study needs to be performed to determine and find solutions or options for Meeting 94-16 Page 5 buildings and materials. He reviewed the highlights of the facilities inventory and evaluation prepared by Gould Architects. C. Britton explained the background on the written communication, dated May 25, 1994 from Robert J. Logan, in behalf of his client Loren McQueen. B. Crowder voiced concern over the $143,000 study estimate. Consultant Bill Gould of Gould Architects responded that the figures given were only estimates for the Board to review and get an idea of the costs involved and magnitude of this project. P. Siemens expressed concern that the $20,000 for the Phase H study would not provide the costs for asbestos abatement. B. Crowder and T. Henshaw stated that any decision on expenditure of funds should be deferred until after June 7. R. McKibbin spoke in favor or demolishing the buildings at this time and directed staff to recontact San Jose State University about the buildings. C. Britton explained that further study is recommended to provide information for decisions which need to be made and the costs involved, not only by the Board, but for anyone in the public who may be interested in future use of the structures. Motion: N. Hanko moved that the Board accept the preliminary findings of the initial report and authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Gould Architects of San Jose for $20,000 to provide services to prepare for a public hearing and solicitation of proposals for use of the buildings and facilities at Mt. Umunhum. T. Henshaw seconded the motion. The motion passed 4 to 3 on the following vote: Ayes: Directors T. Henshaw, N. Hanko, P. Siemens, and W. de Wit Noes: Directors B. Crowder, G. Babbitt, and R. McKibbin C. Britton noted that a response would be prepared to respond to Robert J. Logan's May 25, 1994 letter written in behalf of his client, Loren McQueen, regarding the agenda item and staff report on Mt. Umunhum. C. Status ft—ort on Proposed Sale of Surplus Land at Teague Hill Qpen Space Preserve and Presentation of Draft Prospectus Offering Sale Approach (E=rt R-94-63) C. Britton stated that staff has been working with the Town of Woodside on a lot fine adjustment based on existing legal parcels . He said that the sale process would conclude with opening of sealed offers at a regular Board meeting in fall 1994. Motion: B. Crowder moved that the Board accept the current form and approach for a prospectus offering the surplus properties for sale and that staff present the completed proposal for the surplus sale to the Board for approval after finalizing the research of subdivision process alternatives. P. Siemens seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0. Meeting 94-16 Page 6 VIII. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS C. Britton reported Sempervirens Fund is sponsoring a hike on Saturday, June 4 for the new trail connecting Butano, Memorial, and Big Basin Parks. He said he received notification that there will be a farewell dinner Wednesday, June 1, for Pat Kammerer and George Hinoku, outgoing Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Commission members of Santa Clara County. C. Britton said he had received an agreement from the Corps of Engineers to access Mt. Umunhum at Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. He reported that the Trail Center would like to sell lemonade at some of the District's preserves and that he will notify them that the District policies do not permit such an activity. C. Britton reported that new legislation is proposed to overturn Proposition 117 (mountain lion habitat) and make mountain lions a game animal with a $1 tag. He said he spoke with Jerry Meral of the Planning and Conservation League regarding wording and positioning of Proposition 180 on the ballot and they are not going to pursue any changes. D. Woods explained the background behind C. Britton's May 20, 1994 letter to Alex Zuckerman, editor REBAC Reporter, regarding a bicycle route for NASA employees between the Stevens Creek Trail and NASA's northwest gate. M. Smith asked Board members to confirm if they are available on Saturday, September 24 or Saturday, October 1 for the San Mateo County tour for public officials. R. Anderson said that a Resource Management workshop would be scheduled in July. S. Schectman distributed Brown Act handbooks to the members of the Board. W. de Wit reported on the staffing of the District display at the San Carlos Hometown Days event. P. Siemens reported he attended a Town of Los Gatos budget meeting, noting the town planned to cut their ranger program. G. Babbitt reported seeing off road skate boards at Fremont Older Open Space Preserve and questioned whether this type of activity was allowed on District preserves. IX. CLOSED SESSION G. Babbitt stated that the Board would be meeting in closed session to discuss the general manager's performance evaluation under Government Code Section 54957. Meeting 94-16 page 7 The Board adjourned to closed session at 9:37 P.M. to discuss: 1. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Government Code Section 54957) Title: General Manager The meeting was adjourned at 10:07 P.M. Susan Dale Recording Secretary ti n P Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Meeting 94-17 REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS June 8, 1994 MINUTES I. ROLL CALL President Ginny Babbitt called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. Members Present: Pete Siemens, Bob McKibbin, Teena Henshaw, Ginny Babbitt, and Wim de Wit. Nonette Hanko arrived at 7:35 and Betsy Crowder arrived at 9:30 P.M. Personnel Present: CraigBritton,Jean Fiddes, Malcolm Smith John Escobar Rand Anderson Sue y Schectman, Del Woods, Sheryl Cochran, Deirdre Dolan, and Emma Johnson. II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were no oral communications. III. ADOPTION OF AGENDA G. Babbitt announced the agenda was adopted by consensus. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR , Motion: T. Henshaw moved that the Board adopt the consent calendar including approving the minutes of May 11 and May 18, 1994; authorizing the general manager to execute photocopier lease agreement with Lanier Worldwide Incorporated;authorizing the general manager to execute a lease on behalf of the District with the Alzheimer's and Related Diseases Association for the excess office space located at 330 Distel Circle upon approval of District's legal counsel, and approving Revised Claims 94-11. B. McKibbin seconded the motion. The motion passed 5 to 0. V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS There were no written communications. VI. BOARD BUSINESS A. Consideration of Proposal to Change Start Time of District Board Meetings to 7:00 P.M. R. McKibbin proposed starting the regular Board meetings at 7:00 P.M. so that closed sessions would not be held at such a late hour following the public portion of the meetings. Discussion centered on the ability of the public to arrive at 7:00 P.M. The Board reached a consensus to start closed sessions at 6:30 or 7:00 P.M. depending on the amount of time needed and to continue starting the public portion of its regular meetings at 7:30 P.M. for a two-month trial period. 330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, arnia 94022-1404 • Phone: 415-691-1 FAX: 415-691-0485 0 Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Ro„err,M(Kihbin, feena Henshaw,crony Babbitt, Nonette Han—),Betsv Crowder,Wim de Wit Meeting 94-17 Page 2 Motion: G. Babbitt moved that closed sessions start prior to public sessions of regular meetings for a two-month trial period. P. Siemens seconded the motion. Discussion: T. Henshaw announced that she would abstain from the vote because she will not be able to attend Board meetings for the next six weeks. The vote passed 5 to 0. B. Amendment to Agreement with the City of Mountain View for Deer Hollow Farm IncludinE Assigning One District Maintenance Worker to the Farm and Transferring $19.000 in Budget to Temgg= Salaries Account (R_gport R-94-67) J. Escobar reported that the City of Mountain View had requested assistance from other agencies to keep Deer Hollow Farm operating and that ultimately Santa Clara County approved a$50,000 grant toward the cost of educational programs at the farm for fiscal year 1994-1995, provided the District contributed an equal amount. He said the City is willing for the District to provide maintenance services as an alternate to cash assistance for the program, and will change brochures and signs to give the District recognition as equal partners in the Deer Hollow Farm program. The Board praised the educational program that the Farm provides. Motion: N. Hanko moved that the Board authorize the general manager to execute the third amendment to the agreement with the City of Mountain View providing one District maintenance worker to assist with the operation of Deer Hollow Farm for one ear, beginning July 1 1 4• 'be 7 99 amend the District fiscal - s scat year 1994 1995 Y g 8 Y Y budget to include an additional$19,000 in temporary salaries to offset the impact of the subject agreement on the District's regular maintenance activities; and direct staff to work with the City of Mountain View, the County of Santa Clara, and other interested organizations to develop a long-term strategy for future operation of the farm. P. Siemens seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. C. Tentative Adoption of a Comprehensive Plan for Public Use and District Management of St. Jo=h's Hill Q= Space Preserve RcR= (R-94-70) S. Cochran gave an overview of the preserve, noting its location on the map. She said the preserve has 267 acres and a 94-acre open space easement over property owned by the California Province of the Society of Jesus. D. Woods reported on the Caltrans overpass improvement project on Highway 17 and where trails, overpasses, and interchanges will be located relevant to St. Joseph's Open Space Preserve. He said Phase I (grading) of the project has been funded and will be finished by the end of summer. He said Phase H will begin next year and will include the overpass and dividers and should be finished late in 1996. S. Cochran reviewed the location of all trail segments and the changes that are proposed including closures, restorations, signs and barriers, and new trails. She showed slides of some of the area and trails that require changes, including the pistol range, vineyard, and oak mitigation area. S. Cochran noted that the walking zone of the Jones Trail only applies to bicyclists at this time. Andy Hospidor, 208 Kimbel Avenue, Los Gatos said that he rides the Jones Trail and that Meeting 94-17 Page 3 there is an increasing number of joggers coming down the hill very quickly and it is difficult to maneuver a bicycle being walked around groups of joggers traveling at fast speeds, and that it presents a conflict situation. S. Cochran said the current Jones trail will remain open to multi-use on a temporary basis until the historic Jones Trail opens, with the condition that the walking zone be maintained and enforced. She added that if and when the historic Jones Trail alignment is re-opened, the current Jones Trail alignment would then be closed to bicycle use and be hiking only. G. Babbitt asked when the new trail would be opened and C. Britton responded that the District has an option to acquire .8 acre to open the historic Jones Trail and that it will cost approximately $60,000 to acquire the property, $30,000 to install chain link fence and rebuild the alignment. He said staff is asking the Town of Los Gatos to share those expenses. G. Babbitt asked why the current Jones Trail is designated for walking or running. J. Escobar explained that the Trail Use Committee determined that separating runners from hikers was unnecessary so the land use rules and regulations were revised. S. Cochran said that even though the mitigation measures would be completed as proposed, the trail would still not be up to multi-use standards. An unidentified member of the audience said she has been using the trails at St. Joseph's Hill for many years as a runner, biker, and walking her dog, and has had only one trail conflict. She said she was concerned about the public comment and how representative they are of the thousands of users. G. Babbitt said that most often the negative comments are what are received and may not be typical of the experience of the majority of preserve users. Gene Zambetti, Big Basin Way, Saratoga said he agreed with the potential hazard of runners running down the hill and hikers or walking bicyclists walking up the hill. He asked about the renovation of the pistol range. G. Babbitt clarified that the District will restore the property to its natural condition, not renovate the property for a pistol range. Mr. Zambetti asked what percentage of the current trails meet with the District's trail standards. R. Anderson said that, while the trail standards are flexible, parts of section 3 are not up to standard and are being recommended for closure, but that most of what is being proposed to retain meets standards. S. Cochran continued that Caltrans will give the District$45,000 for the oak mitigation project which will be used for resource management and trail projects on the preserve, and that implementation of the plan is scheduled for spring of 1995. John Lincoln, Los Gatos noted that the Los Gatos Trail Commission has found a public easement on the east side of Los Gatos Creek to Main Street bridge and that a foot trail exists from the bridge to the Novitiate Park. S. Cochran said the trail ties into the Jones trail and there is a proposal to allow multi-use in the future. Mr. Lincoln said the Los Gatos Creek Trail is expected to be finished in the fall and increased usage could be expected in the St. Joseph Hill area. There were several questions regarding the fencing around the oak mitigation area. R. McKibbin asked if any consideration was given to fencing each tree rather than fencing the entire area. S. Cochran said that each tree will be fenced for protection from deer and gophers in addition to the fencing of the larger area. C. Britton added that the fencing plan is not only to protect the trees but to protect the elaborate drip system that Caltrans will be installing. Meeting 94-17 Page 4 S. Cochran noted that the historic Jones Trail alignment and current Jones Trail alignment was constructed on the old flume right of way. She said that at the time of acquisition of the right of way the Town of Los Gatos agreed to take title to the lower portion of the flume adjacent to Novitiate Park and that they intended to preserve a portion of the flume for historical purposes. She said staff has been working to transfer title of the lower portion of the flume back to the town and are recommending dedication of the old right of way as open space, the only part of the preserve that is not dedicated. N. Hanko said that at the last Use and Management Plan she and K. Duffy had felt it important to preserve some element of the flume. She asked how the dedication would influence the preservation of the flume. C. Britton said that the District did not want the liability of a flume on District property and that the District's portion that is recommended for dedication does not have a flume on it. N. Hanko thanked S. Cochran and staff for a very comprehensive report. She noted that Exhibit A omitted segment 10 of the trail map and that the second paragraph on page 26 was in error, that the Do Committee is reviewing do use and that the material has not one to g g g g the use and managment committee. S. Cochran noted that the omission in Exhibit A had been corrected. G. Babbitt said that the existing trail map is misleading in that it says that dogs on leash are allowed on all preserve trails and should refer to all St. Joseph's Hill trails. H. Haussler asked if anyone has removed the expended lead from the target range and the District's liability for it. R. Anderson said staff will attempt to leave the site undisturbed and let natural restoration take place. H. Haeussler said that it should present no danger. N. Hanko, referring to public comments listed on page 11, asked about the location of the bench proposed by a member of the public. S. Cochran said the location was along the Jones Trail by an oak tree. N. Hanko said there had been a shrine and bench and asked what had become of the shrine. R. Anderson replied that it had either been vandalized or removed by someone. N. Hanko said that it would be a good idea to have a bench in the area, perhaps where the shrine was located. Motion: R. McKibbin moved that the Board tentatively adopt the revised Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for St. Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve as contained in the staff report. P. Siemens seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0. D. A ftfion of 69=dix A to District's Rules of Procedure Establishing Procedures and Standard Forms for Closed Sessions (ROM R-94:W S. Schectman explained that she is proposing adoption of an appendix to the District's Rules of Procedure to standardize the format for the required public notice of items to be discussed in closed session, the adoption of a formal rule of confidentiality of closed session discussions except where disclosure is required by the Brown Act or authorized by the Board, and standard forms to ensure compliance with the new Ralph M. Brown Act which governs public meetings of legislative bodies. Discussion centered on the definition of employee, whether the Board could meet in closed session to discuss the hiring of a Board consultant, and what information is appropriate for individual Board members to discuss in terms of closed session items. N. Hanko proposed amending Standard Form No. 2 to state "Personal authorized to disclose information Meeting 94-17 Page 5 authorized to be disclosed...". S. Schectman noted that closed session discussions are confidential, but final actions must be disclosed. Motion: T. Henshaw moved that the Board adopt Appendix A to the District's Rules of Procedure and the amended Standard Form No. 2. R. McKibbin seconded the motion. The motion passed 7 to 0. VII. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS C. Britton reported that the Board had received invitations to the Sunday, June 12 Stevens Creek Trail dedication and ground-breaking and asked if any Board member would be attending. G. Babbitt said she would attend. C. Britton reported that in response to a request from N. Hanko and B. Crowder, staff would stamp the corresponding agenda number on reports in Board members' packets. C. Britton distributed copies of the working calendar from the Action Plan/Goals and Objectives Workshop, noting that some dates had been changed to more realistically reflect timeframes. He reported that he and M. Smith attended budget hearings in Sacramento and met with Ralph Heim. He distributed a summary of the votes on all the ballot propositions. He said M. Smith will be getting precinct analyses so areas of support can be identified. C. Britton continued that the District does not have a legislative program at this time and the Legislative, Finance, and Public Affairs Committee should meet to propose a legislative program to be in place by January of next year. He suggested the District host a breakfast for local legislators to discuss a legislative program. He continued that he had written Marshall Burak of San lose State regarding the Mt. Umunhurn study and he had asked for additional time to evaluate the potential use of the facilities by the school. B. Crowder reported that she attended a Ridge Trail event in San Francisco to honor William Penn Mott. G. Babbitt said that Vice President P. Siemens will attend the Legislative, Finance, and Public Affairs Committee meeting on June 9 as an alternate since T. Henshaw could not attend, and she, as the designated alternate, could not attend either. T. Henshaw reported that she will be absent from Board meetings for the next six weeks because she will be attending a symposium at Harvard University. W. de Wit thanked all the Board and staff members who worked on the telephone bank for Proposition 180. J. Escobar reported that there had been nine injuries, eight of which were solo bike accidents on preserves during the May 14 to June I period. He displayed the new tee shirts that docents will be wearing. He said that, in answer to a question from the last meeting, skateboarding and rollerblading are prohibited under District ordinances. R. Anderson reported that Santa Clara County agricultural department will conduct a test involving the release of weevils to eat yellow star thistle at Fremont Older Open Space Preserve. He said he attended the San Mateo County Alternative Funding Committee's presentation of an interim status report on the budgetary status of the County Parks and Recreation Department. He noted that the Planning Program will host a "Show and Tell" presentation on June 24 from Noon to 3 PM at La Meeting 94-17 Page 6 Honda Creek Open Space Preserve and invited Board members to attend. He said a meeting has been scheduled at 7:00 P.M., July 20 to review the draft Resource Management Policies. S. Schectman reported she had distributed copies of an updated attorney-client memo to keep the Board informed of legal matters. She added that she had contacted the general counsel for East Bay Regional Park District to meet and establish a group of attorneys who represent special districts to share ideas and resources. M. Smith reported that the District has obtained a mailing list of spanish-speaking households in Redwood City, San Carlos, and other cities and will send the spanish language version of the District's fact sheet to the homes. He said that the Annual Report has been distributed to the Board. P. Siemens reported he had attended a Santa Cruz County LAFCO meeting on special district representation on LAFCO. He said the group is dealing with the rules on latent powers, and that they are breaking ground that the Santa Clara County LAFCO may later wish to follow. He asked staff to review the draft rules to insure that the District's interests are protected. C. Britton said that Ralph Heim would be interested in speaking to the Santa Clara County Special District's Association about passing resolutions requesting representation. VM. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:12 P.M. Emma Johnson Recording Secretary I, RESPONSE ACTION PROPOSED BY STAFF Board President Acknowledge/Respond Director Acknowledge/Respond Staff Acknowledge/Respond ✓ Draft Response Attached Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft Response for Board Consideration per Board Directive(s) No Response Necessary Harry H. Haeussler, Jr. 1094 Highland Circle Los Altos, CA 94024 June 4, 1994 Board of Directors MROSD 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022 Re:Use of microphones during Board meetings You have spent money to purchase an amplification system for use during Board of Director meetings . And nOw I am tempted to ask "Why?" . During meetings I note that the microphones are not used, and if they are used they are not spoken into. Some rest their elbows on the table, their chin on their hand, and then speak. And some just mumble. I I have asked for shorter stands for the microphones so that the directors are easier to see. Now I recall this request, and instead ask that you obtain small clip-on microphones (similar to those used by television reporters) with sufficiently long cords that you can sit back, turn to the side, or whatever, and still be heard . There are also microphones, that can be hidden in wigs or clothing, that stage actors use, the voice transmitted by radio to a pick-up whence it is transmitted to the audience. No direct wire connection from the speaker to the amplifier. I beseech you to do something on your part to help the hearing impaired. I Ha4 H. Haeussler, Jr. I 1 RESPONSE ACTION PROPOSED BY STAFF Board President Acknowledge/Respond Director Acknowledge/Respond Staff Acknowledge/Respond Draft Response Attached Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft Response for Board Consideratioa per Board Directive(s) No Response Necessary I I Harry H. Haeussler, Jr. 1094 Highland Circle Los Al;tos, CA 94024 I June 4, 1994 I Board of Directors � MROSD 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 914022 I I At the last Board of Directors meeting, I objected to your use of closed session to formulate criteria for judging the position of General Manager. I was informed that Government Code Section 54957 allowed this . I have perused Government Code Section 54957, and I quote "-or from holding closed sessions during a regular or special meeting to consider the appointment, evaluation of performance, or dismissal of a public employee-" , underlining added . If you were evaluating the General Manager, well and good. But I was advised that you we developing ping criteria and or guidelines to judge the performance of the General Manager. The development of criteria and guidelines to evaluate the performance of the General Manager I feel is and should be a matter the general public should be aware of and should be involved in. Therefore, I feel you have violated the intent of Government6 Code Section 54957, or, as generally known, The Brown Act. Harry H. Haeussler, Jr. I� I �I { RESPONSE ACTION PROPOSED BY STAFF Board President Acknowledge/Respond Director Acknowledge/Respond Staff Acknowledge/Respond Draft Response Attached Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft Response for Board Consideration per Board Directive(s) No Response Necessary June 4, 1994 MROSD 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022 Re : Windy Hill Yesterday when I rode Spring Ridge trail on Windy Hill I noted that the thistles on the road/trail/path are so thick and tall that hikers in shorts scratch their legs . Also, horses get stuck with the stickers on the thistles and tend to "act up" , which could be a problem to the rider, or nearby hikers . I further noted that the top, north end, from the walkover entrance to the locked gate (No. 1 ) and walk entrance, about a hundred yards , the thistles are even worse. Grass and weeds $have been cleared on the Skyline side of the walkover, but not the trail . Further, I note that the areas normally mowed for equipment used in fire fighting are not mowed. With the fire season upon us , and the abundance of combustible material, and for the safety and convenience of open space users, I believe it is imperative that these above listed problems be corrected . /" C Harry H. Haeussler, Jr. I JCS►l o ` 14 t i i i I i i i RESPONSE ACTION PROPOSED BY STAFF Board President Acknowledge/Respond Director Acknowledge/Respond Staff Acknowledge/Respond _ D Harry H. Haeussler, Jr . raft Response Attached Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft 1094 Highland Circle Response for Board Consideration per Los Alto, CA 94024 Board Di ective(s) No Response Necessary JUN p 8199" June 8, 1994 MROSD 3230 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022 On June 4 I wrote you about Windy Hill , the Spring Ridge trail. Over the weekend I heard complaints from nearby residents about how overgrown Razorback and Hams Gulch trail had become. Today I rode Hams Gulch trail, met a young couple near the bottom, and two women shortly thereafter, coming down. Both groups complained about the brush overgrowth on the trail (Hams Gulch) . And I must agree with them. Also, on Lost Trail between the top of Hams Gulch and the parking lot, thistle weeds are crowding the trail edge making it most difficult for walkers, much less horses whose legs get scratched, and riders get stuck as well . All of Windy Hill trails need attention. When may the public see some improvement on Windy Hill trails? i Harry H. Haeussler, Jr. I I it I I� Open Space ' uinPr-NINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT DRAFT RESPONSE PREPARED BY STAFF FOR BOARD CONSIDERATION Mr. Harry Haeussler 1094 Highland Circle Los Altos, CA 94024 Dear Harry: The District's Board of Directors reviewed your recent letters, dated June 4 and June 8, regarding use of microphones during board meetings, the Brown Act, and brushing and clearing at Windy Hill Open Space Preserver at our Regular Meeting last night. Thank you for reminding us that our use of microphones at Board meetings is not always as effective as it should be. Staff will be investigating your suggestion of lapel microphones, although it appears that their cost may be prohibitive. In the meantime, President Babbitt and I will make a point of reminding Board members to use their microphones more consistently so that they are fully audible whenever speaking. District legal counsel-and all the members of the Board share your interest in assuring that the Board adheres to the Brown Act. As legal counsel Sue Schectman explained at the May 25 meeting, the purpose of our closed session held pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 was the evaluation of performance of the general manager and our discussions were within the scope of that section. Ms. Schectman has confirmed with the state attorney general's office that discussing with an employee what is expected of his performance is an integral part of any valid performance evaluation and falls under the scope of Government Code Section 54957 of the Brown Act. I hope you will call or meet with Ms. Schectman if you'd like to discuss your concern further. Due primarily to the late rains this year, we are about a month late in completing the annual brushing and clearing of trails and other areas at our Skyline area preserves, including Windy Hill. Unfortunately, equipment breakdowns also impacted our ability to complete the work as early as other years. The clearing, brushing, and mowing of the areas mentioned in your letters should be complete within the next week two weeks, if not earlier. Sincerely, Peter W. Siemens Vice-President Board of Directors PWS:ej cc: Board of Directors 330 Distel Circle % Los Altos, california 94022 1404 Pht>ne: 4'15-691-1200 FAX:415-691-0485 Homd of Oiw(lot,:Pete siemew,,Robert Mr kibbin, 11cii,i.w, t,mm 11,06itt,Nnnette Hanko, Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit i Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT R-94-73 Meeting 94-18 June 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM Presentation on GIS Computer Mapping Research and Development GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS Review and comment on the scope and objectives of the GIS project for the District. DISCUSSION Over the past two years, planning staff have been investigating and pursuing the development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) for the District and have made a modest investment in hardware, software, and data. A GIS system is basically a collection of computerized maps linked to a data base. Linking a wide variety of information to the maps creates powerful analysis, design, and information storage capabilities especially useful to an agency that owns and manages land. Virtually all local cities, counties, and special districts, such as East Bay Regional Park District and Santa Clara Valley Water District, have developed or are developing a GIS. I The long-range goal of the GIS project is to create computer-based versions of all the types of,maps and map-related files that the District maintains. Our approach to this goal is guided by three basic principles: • Learn everything we can from others' experience before we commit to anything. • Try to obtain data from other agencies or organizations working in our area, or work cooperatively with them to generate necessary data. I • Concentrate on acquiring (or obtaining access to) electronic map d= first; the software, hardware, and staff expertise can follow. In the interim, arrangements can i be made with other agencies to provide these services. The 1993-1994 fiscal year planning budget included $5,000 for GIS studies and development. This was spent on a $500 software program that will allow staff to view GIS maps and analyses prepared by others, such as the study of potential staging areas for the Sierra Azul 330 Distel Circle ° Los Altos California 94022-1404 ' Phone: 415-691-1200 ® FAX: 415-691-0485 Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wien de Wit General Manager:L.Craig Britton R-94-18 Page 2 Open Space Preserve in Lexington Basin conducted by students from U.C. Berkeley last year. Planning contributed $3000 and Public Affairs provided $1500 toward a cooperative project with Greenbelt Alliance to develop a set of regional-scale GIS maps for Santa Clara and San Mateo counties, focusing on the District's jurisdiction. Remaining funds were spent on a more powerful computer to run the GIS viewing program and other graphics programs. The 1994-1995 Planning Program budget includes $20,000 for research and preparation of map data, and the Public Affairs Program budget includes $5,000 for the same purpose. These monies are planned to be expended on a continuation of the Greenbelt Alliance cooperative project and through other cooperative arrangements with agencies, organizations, or individuals who can provide useful knowledge or map information to the District. Planning staff will make a brief presentation at your June 22 meeting to answer basic questions about GIS and will demonstrate the existing "view-only" software program using the U.C. Berkeley Sierra Azul staging area study. Jim Sayer, Director of Communications for Greenbelt Alliance, will provide an overview of the cooperative regional GIS project. Prepared by: Randy Anderson, Planning Manager Contact person: Same as above I Open Space R-94-65 Meeting 94-18 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT June 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM Adjustment of Ward 6 Boundaries to Incorporate Lands Annexed to the District, Calling of District Elections in Wards 1, 2, 5, and 6 and Requests for Election Consolidation Services from Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Santa Cruz Counties GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt the attached Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Open Space District Amending Existing Ward Boundaries for Ward 6. I 2. Adopt the attached Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Calling Election and Requesting Election Consolidation Services - Santa Clara County for Wards 1, 2 and 5. 3. Adopt the attached Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Calling Election and Requesting Election Consolidation Services - San Mateo County for Wards 5 and 6. 4. Adopt the attached Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Calling Election and Requesting Election Consolidation Services - Santa Cruz County for Ward 2 5. Reconfirm Section 2.12 of your Rule of Procedure regarding a maximum of 200 words per candidate statement and payment of candidates' statements. Discussion: Voters in four of the seven wards of the District are scheduled to elect Directors this November. The wards and their current Directors are: Ward General Description Incumbent 1 Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Saratoga P. Siemens portions of Cupertino, and portions of Appointed incumbent unincorporated Santa Clara County (Ward 1 filled by appointment in November 1992.) 2 Portions of Cupertino, Sunnyvale, Los Altos, R. McKibbin Stanford; Los Altos Hills; unincorporated Santa Clara County; District lands in Santa Cruz County 330 Distel Circle a Los Altos, California 94022-1404 * Phone: 415-091-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485 Ti Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Nenshaw,"inny Babbitt, Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowde,Wirn de Wit R-94-65 Page 2 5 Palo Alto, portions Stanford and N. Hanko East Palo Alto 6 Menlo Park, Atherton, Ladera, Portola B. Crowder Valley, Woodside, portion of East Palo Alto, Farm Hills area, Emerald lake area, Redwood City-Selby area; and Skyline Area in San Mateo County The attached Exhibit A map, adopted in June 1992, shows schematically the current ward boundaries. In preparing for the District's elections, staff determined that the lands annexed to the District as part of the 1991 Midpeninsula Preserves - Skyline Area annexation, completed in April, 1992, had not been included in the 1992 boundary adjustments. These Skyline area lands in San Mateo County should be included in Ward 6, as should the lands recently annexed to the District by the 1993 Midpeninsula Preserves - Russian Ridge annexation. The Skyline area lands in Santa Cruz County that the District annexed in February 1992 are part of Ward 2. In preparation for the November 8 general election, it is necessary for you to call an election in the District and request election consolidation services from Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Santa Cruz Counties. The nomination period for the election will open on Monday, July 18 and close on Friday, August 12. In addition, it is necessary for the District Clerk to relay to the Registrar of Voters in each County the Board's policy regarding payment of candidate statements and number of words to be included in each statement. Section 2.12 of your Rules of Procedure allows a single qualified candidate to appear on the ballot at no cost to the candidate, and that if such unopposed candidate requests that his or her candidate's statement be included in the official election material distributed to voters, the District shall bill the candidate for the costs, including costs related to Spanish translation. In those wards where two or more candidates have qualified to appear on the ballot, candidates statements of qualifications, (and, if provided by the respective county for county candidates, Spanish translations of candidates' statements for those requesting them) up to a maximum of 200 words, shall, if requested, be provided by the District at its expense pursuant to the Elections Code of the State of California, and no such candidate shall be billed for availing himself or herself of these services. Prepared by: Jean H. Fiddes, District Clerk Contact person: Same as above ��T a° MEllb?ae�1 tip Burlingame Ma °°RFuAMA ,+W'`O � ` 3 _ lamada ` Alvarado = 7 k q n DDetot� °A uPs LL I ��` Sunol 1.>.e - �•� HillsbCorou h yT J-1 \ I Van Mate �I I r�'O =f;sN,Mo"%EA �� L. •�� = 1 0 NFE�,. �. _ RA CISCO o, 3 AV.` $ FL s `r^ 3 sat L.Nr a v F Nils 1st +f'-'`''`•.. �` � Pilarcitos 8 B � '°"^"'J-"r' 1 1 � 1 , � �• 'S 'i _. I_ t 'L,rl r Rut►a' Pr` a I' ''s --- LR. TATE xAYYE Spas o +.`'d�-�-� - - r_`•'� m coi FQ E.,.,; �j' • CenlervileDist.'' c RII _ 4,� •t - / '}M `�, '.SAN FRANCISC 4r BA/RI i Rrd JAPr. ioLL i a Boa Irving on 4E /r_---- _'-1Pl$H' ' P ♦, I M��. 9E, � ISLAND %� BAYN � �•- ? Et,e UN fL s,f t3 DISt. � �S?`� \I A ' I ``Lower y 2' xnLsonL of°E f,+E � '�'edu � 1 , 6-WILDUF EFUpE 3 ewark •a sro» _-. = Crystldllission'- SPn. •`BEL San lose r° / Lr Res. »XI` IALSVtOK AYE QQ -i.- N EN'�R3V•n tP a? 5 6 r--! $\ DlsL 8 Granada AND L ISTA ,s R O AI HARBOR - •�� o+BO 3`1 ¢ y - WSrA 2 rE roRT, z.) / - _ y°� P°AX"Y• ao.3 "o _ _ -_- f� Carlos 2 Pw eR - D T ala 5 r _U fL.n e s t P� 2 x __ ar` Redwoo it --- _ 6` mba Ion I '- ea Cryst •i' �4l' *i EF.,: pp. y p� ----'krir� 'Dti Warm Springs CN BAY `n lL ' SPrs. fYa APrs. s '•)EkP MVFn W°a° ��-W `` -°O1 *A lyy SPACL MESMYF $^_�'` ``` •� DISC. BEACH N' Res. +o' d. 2g Iceann tI GAME G' 1 fw0°0 P BE E ,i' EL0 Atherton 15,A Half Moon Bay REFUGE 2 ° ar / _ s•R i I x10GIN3 , 3 I,'b0 enlo Parts 2 £ t I 5`AMIro.Rf vALo Hi KARsoR °y°ram-r Ri�ly`� �.\v. a = Eann I - " 1 i ! :•\ YYFjf I URISIYA fAFE� `�F 2 El.SB+E NJ I OPAL LTO•AYFANOS_ j AEF(vDE .� i '.0 '%.' PCREDx0°Ps 1 'j�, HARP ` EL.3B1\�> Z Palo AID PAI X'eu MESEAYE art J a_:' y ;. _ NCNLIN AE,WEE haNrR Pt.r `' M.,,T,y Woodside y Gtp I {1 �°e. ` _ 3"°.Ef iR ,,3 ..`,-\Yow�lcx' f���e� ,d CALAr�4o, \\ vAE3FME a0. +s t} t STAN , J _ AM iuoY AAE _ 'k TKO roRI OR an AI I- \`\ + 1.•�° xI L B„ oa 2 i — M;S "IS:L Milpifas •xP BB =Y• ..41A4. 'A4y r ! \ ,-. "LANot .�" o"rE _ AEA tcs tryo 2` �r�-sr.F,o..11T �rBEW p0 �71 Purisima. a� a w P rcH °q I' Fr +,,Eno .AN AeE _1i+r G4 ° C u ( Nf rsE M1 aDx.,, OxrE Ra _ -�SennviUe .6• � c� YtM. r - '� +. 2 ru 1 Y, R S F 1 _ e 6 Lokr so' Hos• Mt ,GxE'+1'S" xHFX ]R A/ R BIDL MESFRVE (a`r A R - - N E R I 1' 2 Portola i a - 'L2 vle x n t w &:,"Ex 1 S.os; - 0 a lobitos A (,A NJ_,�•Sky Londa Valley gnew � f Ae B Altos .y t et I e, MAATIN'S BEACH U QFi _ '7 _ S•{_Y 'PD S e F,y9 L'LOs \ 1�� v J' 1 \ I R o neY. „ `Pd IP° 'Ri o 5+� _ �ar tIiHS,� 2 Iumtas arF sP.c ao. 1 z DBD nm r tt I„n w S ,p F001: Moaor 3 ,d - Yale t e Santa Clar °AIAPgT, e ~ - \ " - HILLS rxLL t1'I '1 •v5 f,1105 CAMIND HEAL E G pAr! PARK r R EAvfE v ff E 1 Z I OJ ° (�ICXE XPEAI LL �, Bq 3 �S 3 S.C. NIVP NE 1 I J u �i5 - 2 VI ESEA�cFSf AAHCNO 4AFiNhO<I°--X \ • i 1 CgP� -. N - cOALc „'� BO OEM SPAII•RESLFNf,'•: iw t 4NE°A ,►. 1 San ON $PACEPAESE _- `SAN wTO PW\' 1 SAN GREGORIO �` O __ I SA BEACH GfEgO'10` +. ♦? - RO FL of a y I JWE vF ' _ ! 2 CREEK 2' BLVD 1 's tGgloS _ _La Honda I VLLO-1_; Permane s• I y OPEN SPACE VN r ~ y San �" 1 �\ PoMPoNIO �Ay NlmIADE HYACF PRE-SEA -•1 �' .(r _ o0vIE 2 PO.V 0O BEACH r SAM M°DONALD• NE BRWf 3 - -___\S ' _ 4p �<r»F`' 2 'd 2 B COUNTY PARK `_ t• \ �i ((`., ^M•q •, _iOrrBorR;d 1 B( SKYUN Lbrr¢Ira F'ROtOfAAao r; ¢ ;: $p g Gd AV 3 2 :'aJose .pW SAN MATED _ _ L ` �-• � s y_ADf MlIiERvf <NIl,O MEMORIAL u� 10 -1----- I , CampbellzL.x yiw OF CWMYPAEi,E �1___a 1 s LONG RIDS T ; PARK ` ENr 51FV NS _-J a•v 1 f A •?xarvA<.� " �PESCAOERO` y SRACE PAE EWE t ---! CAfEK - IA nE Mare - MNRIYEs l4 PESCAOE O AE K An�`I' LD P 1 RR SERVE i 1 fL.Se ;SARArIMA 0 _K / a q '41Z �P _nw tao 14..._ r-t .R•bta- ''"( EL fw _ \2 g!.op .B i' I 1'`,P Arc n- PescaderopWo = ; g L 'APpApO°A EL<RG Pue.LY•Yo Pr. r _„/'... I tWS -. •s _ Saratoga ,� t A aY r+� pare' s iVrf CO PARK M r y 9 R0. •Ir ` y K a sEaCR' d' \ �:.Y h _ _ B R G_ ® ♦o =2 2�$ BLOS�:. _ 1 ^ cesn 3- Monte-' e 2 !/ y -ROCK y - --'{=Z • Iii!E�L<a BEAN HOLLOW y m ,%�JA-``� - a L -. \\ A�s�R(fur' SlrE110 BEACH 1S . mot ¢TATE PARK c 9ANBORN xr G 1 kp 2 -- JH\ RL.T� I 6 1r ofYFLovfo(jrL. ri� __1, MT.I sANT �0$(y�at0$• p T - v,l=n Eo P°R OSI 'MST 9 iii -I ec"'aes m,cJ kF 7� v 1 C q ST.4jF FOREST wa iEANax ou•.' PMLA s, SKYUNF` -' LE.LLsOiEN° AV. •!' ' S ma P,,gAar i �I n!x> __1 - oK�_omNsPAce ;.EMNOrav •' BIG B MESERVE�_ - i `3IEAA.I AZUL CREN RG,I •iauKs(i.• CO Pr. BolsS P1. \, 'p +O I - ; _ UCk , ��' �L,LSPACE PRESFAvE x0.(- GUA LOPE ..� -l _ _ - JWJpER REC AREAS�- REs AREA Ro. Pigeon P1.\C- u°�` L'- L},�_J L r�.n p" __T , I r 1 PE AR REDWOODS W � .� '� sy,Ac, 9 0 OAFOS BE6 _ I -_ Big 8 w •AlOercron 'a aArE ' IL STATE PARR , b L p Basin--r' F ° .T* a edwood Heights + FranxAn PI.`. Br _ u(ofi Fp`� atAGLE ROCKSopcB _ t _ t+ at es Holy City -LOAu Twin C ANO NUEVO STATE RESERVE .�, ,- - Boulder - - a•', ft.AnoNq..a \'/ L o Creek o- - `L urel, -- O Glenwood. Brookdale A, Lornpic e0 c EL 800 a SSEr;aa 3°.v Zayante Ben - °.`3 o _ __ DUYHouxo Roc. r'+o Lomond ,a�_ s :e - ^ 11—AeeEss y & °piF EL.,eR O •Swanton 2 NN `Ecta,r-�. 2 0 E xE "aJ u s s FS - yy't4iF L i c. NM y / t ultw '<THE FOREST OF Felton _ MI.Ne mon l7.M1r°R raw " 1 BB a 3 °`� -NfSENE /AR.• 60nny DDun AHo3" ' Scoiis Apt, EL esB `'c"c Valley @ 6 a fsrA ysJ '-;- E!Jar,o P1.`� C+ E*Rf k{nn UI IBS N', Davenport Landing \ - „a N'= \ ' � !,JUNE 1992 `� 1 Exhibit A - 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT WARD BOUNDARIES RESOLUTION NO. 94-22 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT AMENDING EXISTING WARD BOUNDARIES FOR WARD 6 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District adjusted the ward boundaries of the District's seven wards in 1992 in order to achieve a substantially equal elector population per ward based on 1990 census data; and WHEREAS, the 1991 Midpeninsula Preserves - Skyline Area annexation and the 1993 Midpeninsula Preserves - Russian Ridge annexation annexed certain lands to the District that are not included in the ward boundaries for Ward 6; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District as follows: Section One: Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5534, ward boundaries for Ward 6 are hereby adjusted as delineated in detail on the following maps on file with the District Clerk in the District office, which documents are incorporated herein by reference: Exhibit A-1 Portion of San Mateo County Official Map Exhibit A-2 Portion of San Mateo County Official Map Exhibit B Portion of San Mateo County Official Map Section Two: The ward boundaries of Ward 6 as established by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District on June 29, 1992 by Resolution 92-31 are hereby amended as shown on Exhibits A-1, A-2, and B, a copy of which is affixed hereto and by reference made a part hereof. 44- b ------ ---—------- LEGEND ANNEXATION PARCELS :Mindego Hi -----------------1------------------ ------------ ------------------ ------- ------------------ ------------------ 2o 23 24 2. 2 xf 25 NOT v A INCLUDED - --- ----- ---------- ----- --- -------- 1. 21 3o 2. 2. 13 34 1. 25 35 S. yl e ---------------- ------------- EXHIBIT A-1 REVISED WARD BOUNDARY FOR WARD 6 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT R 3 W AS ADOPTED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON JUNE 1994 SEE SHEET S 1000 2o-o .4000 A, JEAN H. FIDDES, DISTRICT CLERK o LEGEND o ANNEXATION PARCELS z z SE U ,E Sk'E E T 4 0 0 U _ 0 �� i it ti, y �iM ]�• �E�t� '�' lam" sssf'�z i't;T.0 S. 4_ Mil 0 e ON ------ -- C _ I o ci o C. i;: • ., :::e:Zq:z:>is-^:;z;;{;i[":i`i:::%i;E:•..;:� s n _._'�� ] ° I'nu rn�A T A T E Pd J,K �r v .J I EXHIBIT A-2 REVISED WARD BOUNDARY FOR WARD 6 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT AS ADOPTED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS ONJUNE 1994 i JEAN H. FIDDES, DISTRICT CLERK 0 1000 200o 4000',� LEGEND ANNEXATION PARCELS ---- ------- ----- - ---------------------- ------ c ------------------ 0 < 6 0 -V ------------------ ---------- ------- ---------- Cs J. e Long, y Hi ................... — ------ LA H 0 N D A - ------ .3 1. 20 20 2. A EXHIBIT B REVISED WARD BOUNDARY FOR WARD 6 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT :Uindego Hi-- - ------ ----------- ------------------ -- ----------------- ------------------ ------------AS ADOPTED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON JUNE 1994 19 20 I 20 JEAN A. FIDDES, DI 3o 2' 2 STRICT CLERK 1m0 2.-o 40OD'Ilghl RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CALLING ELECTION AND REQUESTING ELECTION CONSOLIDATION SERVICES - SANTA CLARA COUNTY WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Section 5530 requires that an election be held within the territory of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District at the time of the general election on November 8, 1994 for the election of du= (3) Directors of the District; and WHEREAS, a general statewide election will be held within Santa Clam County on that date; NOW, THEREFORE, THE Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5530, the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula, Regional Open Space District does call an election in the District for the election of three (3) members of the Board of Directors of the District in Wards 1, 2, and 5 on Tuesday, November 8, 1994. 2. That said election be consolidated with the statewide general election to be held in Santa Clara County on said date. 3. That the election precincts, polling places, voting booths, and election officials in each of the precincts shall, to the extent practicable, be the same as provided for the statewide election on said date, as prescribed by the ordinance, order, resolution, or notice of the Board of Supervisors of said County calling, providing for or giving notice of such other election and which sets forth such precincts, voting booths, polling places and election officials. 4. That the Board of Supervisors of Santa Clara County is hereby authorized and instructed to canvass the returns of said election for the office of members of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District and is requested to certify the results of said election to the Board of Directors of the District. 5. The boundaries of the wards or subdivisions, for the purpose of electing Directors, shall be the same as established by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District in Resolution 92-31 adopted on June 29, 1992. 6. The Board of Directors further requests, pursuant to Election Code, Section 22003, that the County Clerk, Registrar of Voters or other appropriate County official be authorized to render services to the District relating to the conduct of said election. The services shall be of the type normally performed by such County official(s) in assisting the clerks of special districts in the conduct of elections including, but not limited to, checking registrations, printing and mailing ballots, ballot arguments, candidates' statement, hiring election officers and arranging for polling places, and providing and distributing election supplies. 7. The Clerk of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District is hereby authorized to hire the services of the appropriate officials of said County to aid in the conduct of said election as hereinabove provided, and the General Manager of the District is hereby authorized and directed to pay the cost of said services, provided that no payment shall be made for services which said County officials are otherwise required by law to perform. 8. The District Clerk is hereby directed to submit a certified copy of this resolution to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Clara, and to appropriate County election officials of said County. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CALLING ELECTION AND REQUESTING ELECTION CONSOLIDATION SERVICES - SAN MATEO COUNTY WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Section 5530 requires that an election be held within the territory of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District at the time of the general election on November 8, 1994 for the election of two (2) Directors of the District; and WHEREAS, a general statewide election will be held within San Mateo County on that date; NOW, THEREFORE, THE Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5530, the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula, Regional Open Spare District does call an election in the District for the election of two (2) members of the Board of Directors of the District in Wards 5 and 6 on Tuesday, November 8, 1994. 2. That said election be consolidated with the statewide general election to be held in San Mateo County on said date. 3. That the election precincts, polling places, voting booths, and election officials in each of the precincts shall, to the extent practicable, be the same as provided for the statewide election on said date, as prescribed by the ordinance, order, resolution, or notice of the Board of Supervisors of said County calling, providing for or giving notice of such other election and which sets forth such precincts, voting booths, polling places and election officials. 4. That the Board of Supervisors of San Mateo County is hereby authorized and instructed to canvass the returns of said election for the office of member of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District and is requested to certify the results of said election to the Board of Directors of the District. 5. The boundaries of the wards or subdivisions, for the purpose of electing Directors, shall be the same as established by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula. Regional Open Space District in Resolution 92-31 adopted on June 29, 1992 and amended by Resolution 94-22 adopted June 22, 1994. 6. The Board of Dirt,-..jrs further requests, pursuant to Elec* Code, Section 22003, that the County Clerk, Registrar of Voters or other appropriate County official be authorized to render services to the District relating to the conduct of said election. The services shall be of the type normally performed by such County official(s) in assisting the clerks of special districts in the conduct of elections including, but not limited to, checking registrations, printing and mailing ballots, ballot arguments, candidates' statement, hiring election officers and arranging for polling places, and providing and distributing election supplies. 7. The Clerk of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District is hereby authorized to hire the services of the appropriate officials of said County to aid in the conduct of said election as hereinabove provided, and the General Manager of the District is hereby authorized and directed to pay the cost of said services, provided that no payment shall be made for services which said County officials are otherwise required by law to perform. 8. The District Clerk is hereby directed to submit a certified copy of this resolution to the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo, and to appropriate County election officials of said County. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CALLING ELECTION AND REQUESTING ELECTION CONSOLIDATION SERVICES - SANTA CRUZ COUNTY WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Section 5530 requires that an election be held within the territory of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District at the time of the general election on November 8, 1994 for the election of one (1) Director of the District; and WHEREAS, a general statewide election will be held within San Mateo County on that date; NOW, THEREFORE, THE Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula. Regional Open Space District does resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5530, the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does call an election in the District for the election of one (1) member of the Board of Directors of the District in Ward 2 on Tuesday, November 8, 1994. 2. That said election be consolidated with the statewide general election to be held in Santa Cruz County on said date. 3. That the election precincts, polling places, voting booths, and election officials in each of the precincts shall, to the extent practicable, be the same as provided for the statewide election on said date, as prescribed by the ordinance, order, resolution, or notice of the Board of Supervisors of said County calling, providing for or giving notice of such other election and which sets forth such precincts, voting booths, polling places and election officials. 4. That the Board of Supervisors of Santa Cruz County is hereby authorized and instructed to canvass the returns of said election for the office of member of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District and is requested to certify the results of said election to the Board of Directors of the District. 5. The boundaries of the wards or subdivisions, for the purpose of electing Directors, shall be the same as established by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District in Resolution 92-31 adopted on June 29, 1992. 6. The Board of Dirstrs further requests, pursuant to Elm. . Code, Section 22003, that the County Clerk, Registrar of Voters or other appropriate County official be authorized to render services to the District relating to the conduct of said election. The services shall be of the type normally performed by such County official(s) in assisting the clerks of special districts in the conduct of elections including, but not limited to, checking registrations, printing and mailing ballots, ballot arguments, candidates' statement, hiring election officers and arranging for polling places, and providing and distributing election supplies. 7. The Clerk of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District is hereby authorized to hire the services of the appropriate officials of said County to aid in the conduct of said election as hereinabove provided, and the General Manager of the District is hereby authorized and directed to pay the cost of said services, provided that no payment shall be made for services which said County officials are otherwise required by law to perform. 8. The District Clerk is hereby directed to submit a certified copy of this resolution to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz, and to appropriate County election officials of said County. Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT R-94-75 Meeting 94-18 June 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM Scheduling of July 7 Special Meeting with San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Commission GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Schedule a Special Meeting for Thursday, July 7, 1994 beginning at 4:00 P.M. at the San Mateo County Administration Building, Room 101, 590 Hamilton Street, Redwood City for the purpose of holding a special joint meeting with the San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Commission to discuss topics of mutual interest. DISCUSSION As previously announced, a special joint meeting with the San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Commission will be held on July 7. The meeting will begin at 4:00 P.M. in Room 101 of San Mateo County's Administration Building. Agenda topics for the meeting include: (1) Alternative Funding (2) Bicycles on Trails (3) San Francisco Watershed - Ridge Trail (4) Informational Reports Prepared by: Jean H. Fiddes, Administrative Services Manager Contact person: L. Craig Britton, General Manager 330 Distel Circle * Los Altos, California 94022-1404 * Phone: 415-691-1200 FAX:415-691-0485 C#3 Board of Oirectors:Pete Siemens,Robert,MCKibbin, Ieena Renshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Iianko, Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit 1 Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN•SPACE DISTRICT R-94-76 Meeting 94-18 June 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM Request for Authorization to Allow California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to Conduct a Fifty Acre Controlled Burn at Monte Bello Open Space Preserve GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the general manager to execute the attached cooperative agreement with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to conduct a controlled burn at Monte Bello Open Space Preserve. DISCUSSION The District has received a proposal from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) to burn approximately fifty acres of grassland at Monte Bello Open Space Preserve as a training exercise for CDF and District staff. The proposed controlled burn site is the former McNeil property in the westerly corner of the preserve (see attached map). The primary purpose of the controlled burn is to provide a valuable live wildland fire training experience for CDF and District staff. No other such fire training opportunities are currently available for District staff to work with CDF crews directly responsible for fire suppression on District lands. The proposed burn area was acquired as part of the McNeil acquisition in 1981. Prior to acquisition, the property had been overgrazed for several years. As a result, yellow starthistle (Centau,rea solstitialis) invaded the disturbed areas and now dominates the burn area. Burning can be used to control starthistles. However, the area may need to be burned annually for three years to exhaust all viable seeds. It is also recommended that burned areas be seeded annually with more desirable grasses. To be effective in the control of starthistle, burning must be completed prior to seed formation that occurs in late July and August. I Although'the fire training value and resource restoration benefits are apparent, staff has focused their review of this proposal on the fire safety implications of a summer season burn. Based on discussions with CDF, staff is confident that the burn can be done safely. As outlined in the attached agreement, CDF will develop a written burn prescription to identify fire weather and fuel moisture conditions that will insure predictable fire behavior. CDF will not conduct the controlled burn unless a minimum of five engines are on site. A twenty-foot fire line will be constructed around the perimeter of the burn area prior to the burn. Actual burning would be done in a series of two- to three-acre burns. CDF would also be limited by state-wide I 330 Distel Circle * Los Altos, California 94022-1404 * Phone: 415-691-1200 * FAX: 4'15-691-0485 e BoardofDirectors:Pete Sienens,Robert McKbbin, Teena Henshaw,(finny Babbitt,Nanette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit R-94-76 Page 2 staffing and dispatching levels that place other demands on their resources during periods of extreme fire danger. CDF will supervise all aspects of the bum, including air quality authority approval, notification of other jurisdictions, and notification of the surrounding neighbors. District staff will contact neighbors of the bum area in advance of the actual bum. Prepared by: John Escobar, Operations Manager Contact: Same as above CONTROLLED BURN PROJECT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of 1994 by and between the State of California through the Director of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, hereinafter called "CDF", and Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, hereinafter called "District", is intended to provide for site preparation, controlled burning, and necessary follow-up activities of an area owned by District. The Controlled Burn Project Plan is appended to and made part of this Agreement as Attachment 1. WHEREAS District owns a proposed controlled burn area delineated on a map incorporated within the Controlled Burn Project Plan and that this burn area is within the boundaries of the Monte Bello Open Space Preserve; and WHEREAS both CDF and District personnel will obtain valuable wildland fire suppression experience by participating in this project; and WHEREAS CDF has determined that the anticipated public benefit from the proposed project will exceed the foreseeable damage that could result from the proposed Project, NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed: 1. CDF agrees to conduct and supervise all aspects of the burn project. The Ranger Unit Chief who approves the Controlled Burn Project Plan will designate an Incident Commander. This Incident Commander shall have final authority (a) to approve, amend, and implement the Controlled Burn Project Plan, (b) to determine that the fuel and weather is suitable, and that all crews and equipment are ready, and (c) to direct all work assignments of employees furnished by District until the controlled burning is completed and the fire is declared out. 2. CDF agrees to secure approval from air pollution control authorities and any other required permits or approvals. CDF agrees to notify local residents and all surrounding 1 prior t conducting the burn project. jurisdictions of the burn plan p o o g p � 3. All personnel provided b District to participate in this burn project shall be employees of Pe P Y P P P the District for purposes of Workers' Compensation. All personnel provided by CDF to participate in this burn project shall be employees of CDF for purposes of Workers' Compensation. 4. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the above date and will terminate upon satisfactory completion of the controlled burning project, and the necessary follow-up activities, but in no event will the term of this agreement exceed three years. 5. CDF agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the District, and its directors, officers, agents, and employees from and against all personal injury and property damage liability for any and all losses, claims, suits, expenses, damages, or injuries of whatever kind or nature, including attorneys' fees and court costs, which arise out of or are related to any acts, omissions, conduct, operations or performance of CDF or any of its officers, employees, agents, or servants under this Agreement. Controlled Bum Project Agree- nt Page 2 This agreement and the Controlled Bum Project Plan represent the entire contract between CDF and District. This Agreement may be amended at any time by mutual consent in writing. It may be canceled by either party after giving 30 days written notice. In the event District unilaterally terminates this Agreement, District shall be responsible for all planning and site preparation costs incurred by CDF prior to Termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto, upon the date first above written. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Steve Wert, Ranger Unit Chief Date Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District L. Craig Britton, General Manager Date Controlled Bum Project Agr ent: Attachment 1 CONTROLLED BURN PROJECT PLAN BACKGROUND Midpeninsula, Regional Open Space District (MROSD) manages approximately fifty acres of grassland that spans two gently sloping north-south ridges, located approximately one-half mile north of the intersection of Page Mill Road and Skyline boulevard (NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of section 15, range 3W, township 7S). Interspersed throughout the grasses are growths of an invasive species of starthistle that MROSD would like to eradicate. The San Mateo/Santa Cruz Ranger Unit of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) has a need for a location to conduct its annual fire readiness exercise. The exercise is most valuable if it is conducted under live fire conditions. PLAN In cooperation with MROSD, CDF will conduct several two- to three-acre controlled bums, utilizing fire engines and hand crews. At completion of the exercise as much of the available area as possible will have been burned. All burning will take place under highly controlled conditions. The bums are intended to provide fire fighting personnel an opportunity to demonstrate their readiness to perform on wildland fires, to review various fire attack methods, and to reduce growth of invasive starthistle. Prior to the exercise, CDF will secure approval from air pollution control authorities and notify local residents and all surrounding jurisdiction of the burn plan. Burning will be conducted solely within pre-planned and constructed lines, according to a weather prescription intended to minimize control problems and adverse smoke conditions. Additionally, use of bulldozers to remove fuel will be limited to light blade work on existing roads. All new line construction will be done by hand to minimize scarring. CDF will assume all liability and financial responsibility for this project. EXERCISE DESIGN 1. The planned bum area is indicated on the attached map. This existing District access road from Page Mill Road to the pond located at the lower left of the bum perimeter will have its vegetation removed to allow it to be utilized as the left flank control line. Ben Lomond Youth Conservation Camp fire crews will construct a hand line from the flat area adjacent to page Mill Road down the ridge at the right side of the bum perimeter and across the bottom between the ponds, to tie in with the road on the left flank. The width of this line will be extended 20 feet by burning out a strip of grass prior to lighting training fires. 2. A minimum of one engine strike team (five engines and a leader) will be assigned each day. MROSD staff will also participate in the training exercises. The flat parking area at the top of the site will be used as an incident command post and resource check-in and staging area. 3. Fire attack methods demonstrated will include hand-line construction, progressive hose-lays, and mobile attack. 4. Burning will occur within the pre-designated weather prescription. Page Mill Road N _ 1 �Roa �J22 _ \ � �- PROPOSED BURN AREA — B M'i 1 MONTE BELLO OPEN SPACE PRESERVE Existing Access Roads •-• •' Existing Trails ———— Existing Disc Line X • X' Proposed Hand Constructed Fire Line Pond Q> ��, Scale: 1 " = Approx. 800 Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT TO: Board of Directors FROM: C. Britton, General Manager DATE: June 22, 1994 SUBJECT: FYI 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone:415-691-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485 Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit General Manager:L.Craig Britton Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL.OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM DATE: 6/22/94 TO: C. Britton, General Manager FROM: M. Smith, Public Affairs Manager RE: Results of Proposition 180 within District Following are the vote results of Proposition 180, by city. Precinct counts are also available if needed. San Mateo County Total for San Mateo Atherton County Los Gatos 46%yes within District 53%yes 54%no 53%yes 47%no 47%no East Palo Alto (includes unincorporated Monte Sereno 62%yes areas) 45%yes 38%no 55% no Menlo Park Santa Clara County Sunnyvale 58%yes Palo Alto 48%yes 42%no 67%yes 52%no 33%no Portola Valley Saratoga 62%yes Los Altos 44% yes 38%no 48%yes 56% no 52%no Redwood City Unincorporated Santa Clara 50.2% yes Los Altos Hills County within District 49.8% no 51%yes 46%yes 49%no 54% no San Carlos 52%yes Mountain View Total for Santa Clara 48%no 53%yes County 47%no within District Woodside 52%yes 51%yes Cupertino 48%no 49%no 48%yes 52%no Total for all precincts within District: 52% yes . . . 48% no 330 Distel Circle * Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 * FAX: 415-691-0485 t Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert MCKlbbin,Teena Henshaw,{pinny B ibbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit CURRENT OPTIONS OWNER ACRES PRICE OPTION APPLICABLE NET OPTION NOTES PRESERVE AMOUNT TO PRICE PRICE DATE Corte de Madera Hosking (884) 5,723,435 N/A N/A 5,723,435 08/15/95 Defasance Contract La Honda Creek Wool 1,293 2,000,000 10,000 0 2,000,000 06/30/95 Oral Agreement Long Ridge Acronico 179 690,000 40,000 40,000 650,000 12/31/94 Devils Canyon Sempervirens Purchase price granted back to Long Ridge Fund 116 300,000 15,000 0 300,000 12/31/94 MROSD for DEKA property General Sierra Azul Convention 162 226,000 10,000 0 226,000 12/31/94 Sierra Azul Johnson, et al 329 510,000 25,000 0 510,000 12/31/94 Sierra Azul North 100 550,000 25,000 25,000 525,000 12/01/94 Sierra Azul POST (Liles) 63 265,000 N/A N/A 265,000 12/31/94 Acquired for sale to MROSD Sierra Azul Lee 20 125,000 5,000 5,000 120,000 12/31/94 58 28.32% of 4/15ths interest in Skyline Ridge Grey/Coelho (768) 1 188,800 10,000 5,000 183,800 12/31/94 Big Dipper Ranch (7.55% of fee) TOTAL 2,320 10,578,235 140,000 75,000 10,503,235 06/22/94 I I "'ITLS ON ��� � � � �~^�u�~�r/�� ry ��^+ ~��~ �w��' @ June8. 1894 � K0eeg|nQ Notice and Analysis oYElection � T#the Supporters ofCALP8VV '94 � Our supreme thanks to o|'ofyou who worked hard to make a difference in California. You gave your time, monoy, and support to an effort which was vorthwhi|o, and showed the people of California that conservationists and some agriculturalists oora about the future of our s\son. Also, our special thanks to the many of you who called and wrote after the election. We appreciate your hind words and thoughts. We gave it our all, and we would gladly do it again for you and the land you want to save. Please plan on attending emeehng at our offices (926 J St, 2nd Floor Conference Room) on July 8 at 10 amtp discuss the e|ertion, and more importan\ly, what to do next. This letter is being sent to the groups and agencies which participated in the Proposition 180 � effort. Please let us know if you plan on aUand|ng, so we can me|eo| a room of on appropriate size. (916'444-8726 extension 5 orG). - What went right with our campaign First, we gathered more signatures by volunteers than any other initiative in California history. That is an effort we can be proud of forever. And the volunteers continued their efforts at the phonabenks, making possible the largest Get Out the Vote effort involving volunteers in recent memory. Second, we raised more money — over two and a half million dollars -- than any other grassroots based initiative in history. This � � shows that California conservationists are willing 0z invest their beliefs. |n the effort \o win, waspent it all where it did the most good, and finished the campaign with virtually no money |n the bank. Third, we built a broader based coalition than any other previous environmental initiative. VVe not only had the support ofevery conservation group in California, but we were joined by uvvide variety of agricultural, ethnic, oubuud, histohoa|, and civic groups. Just ooyou know who made up the coalition (see attached final endorsement list). Fourth, we were supported by a wide variety of elected officials and most of the major newspapers in the state. Fifth, we ran a campaign targeted at the voters who would make the difference: the one and a half million undecided voters who � decide virtually every o|ooiion in California. We mailed more than 7 million pieces of moi|, bought more than $80.000 in radio spots in the |e$ week, and made more than 1.100'000 oa||o to voters who were not likely\ovote. We convinced more than 130.000 of these people to support uo, and many of them voted YES on 180. -VVUhout these efforts they would not have voted! Sixth, we avoided serious opposition. In the end the opposition spent against us about what they did against Pnopoobion7O in 1988. By carefully crafting our initiative, we avoided any serious funded opposition. � SevecKh, we included in the initiative substantial funds for at-risk youth, and were able to legitimately use that theme to convince undecided voters that we could make a difference towards preventing crime. � | The common belief that being at the bottom of the ticket reduces the number of people voting was wrong as usual. Almost theexa= same number of people voted for all four bond acto, even though one led the ballot and one ended ft. There was no correlation owmvean ballot placement and success. Ukowisn, dNnne is still no evidence that being on the November ballot in better for bond acts than June. Despite yesterday's mauks. in the last three June e|ectiono, more bond acts passed than /ai\ed, while in the past three November elections more bond acts failed � � than passed. � What went wrong � ` First and foremost, the Legislature placed four billion dollars of other bond acts on the ballot. Thus, there were a total cf six billion dollars of bonds on the bal|ot, more than any other election in California history. (Even though there were 13 bonds on the ballot in 1990. they totalled only 5.179 billion dollars.) As a /aeuh. the voters rejected every bond act onthe ballot, something which has not happened in the last forty years. Even a well o/aAoU campaign could not withstand such atida/ wave of voter rejection of bonds. � � There isno getting around the fact that schools were viewed as a higher priority than protecting wildlife habitat and improving parks. � � But even schools could not gain the nrlofa majority of the voters. - VYo cannot blame the legislature or the voters for this. Certainly earthquake recovery and education are serious and important issues it is just unfortunate that nature decided to produce the earthquake, and that the legislature and the governor decided 1ofund recovery with bonds. Seoond, voter turnout was abysmally low. We had predicted m turnout of 5.000.000 vc*eca, and many political professionals laughed and said it had to be at least 5.500.000. and probably 6.000.000. In the end, it was only 4.660.000. the second lowest ever for 6 general election. Only 32.9% of the registered voters actually showed up at the polls. Low turnout elections mean a very heavy Republican domination of the results. Although statewide registration favors democrats � over republicans by a margin of48 \o37%. in the Governor's race 52% oY those voting were demoonato, while 4G% were republicans. � � A much higher proportion of the voters were republicans than usual. Third, we did not get all the help we should have from some of the groups that supported the initiative. The Kopp law prevented ua from getting assurances of support while the initiative was being drafted. While itio not clear that the support of these groups wnu!, have made the diffenynce, h certainly would have helped. You should know that the Kopp |mm is being challenged by us in oourt, and a decision by the Court of Appeals is expected in afon months. The Superior Court throw the law out, by the Attorney General appealed. The American Civil Liberties Union has intervene: on our side. Fourth, we never gained the Governor's support. We worked hard for his bond act in 1981 and 1882, but he did not support ours. Again, his support might not have made the difference, but it might have helped. , Fifth, the continuing recession has made the voters xmpy of bonde, and the looming state budget deficit did not improve matters. We knew going into this campaign that we had this problem: no bond act has received more than 54% since the recession began. But we decided that there was simply no a|\ernativo, and we had to go ahead. Our original polling (showing us gaining more than 55%) would have been correct if it had not been for the large number and amount of other bond acts and the incredibly low turnout. Sixth, the opposition made fun oYour"tnop/nd bird senc1uary^. and some people thought wo should not have included that project in the initiative. But keep in mind that they would have picked on some other project (restoration of a historic agricultural college in Heber, or a manure management project in Humboldt County to name two singled out by the Sacramento Bee). Nearly every pnoje�-, io subject to some kind of distorted attack. Seventh, the voter handbook description of the legislative bonds did not include the interest oosto, while ours did. We could do nothing about that, since the legislature sets its own rules about voter handbook description. � What dom/edonow? VYe have a wide variety ufoptions. The first question to answer is whether we still care about the resources and cultural projects we *o,hod ao hard 10 protect. Let me assure you that PCLohU oa,ea, and wewill continue todo everything wo can to protect and preserve these resources. We also assume that those receiving this letter don't take the loss of Proposition 180 as a sign of rejection of environmental quality o. cuhura| heritage preservation by the voters, any more than we can assume the voters don't want to help education orprov/de earthquake relief. It was just too much all at onco, and too few of those that cared bothered to vote. Given this outcome, what can wedo? We have to assume that any new funding for what we care about will come from voter approval. The c%mie'oexisting resources will not be diverted to our prognamm, since they are already stretched thin. Only through new bond acts or taxes can vve gain the necessary funds. November. 1QQ4 � b |o far too late to qualify an initiative for the November baUot, and it is just as well, since there will probably be several controversial measures on the balk* (health care, immigsgion, amokinQ, and so on). But K voter turnout increases somewhat, a legislative park � and wildlife bond measure might be approved if relatively few bonds are placed on the ballot. This iao decision the Legislature must makm, and they will probably be dubious about placing very many bonds on the ballot. But � they wish to move in that direction, ne can offer our support. 1996 There are two elections in 1896. The first is in N\aroh, and will the Presidential primary. This is the first time California will vote no | eady, in an attempt to have a greater say in the selection of the presidential candidate. This election will probably be of greatest interest to repubUoano, since it will help determine the GOP presidential candidate. I President Clinton will probably be easi! )minated, and there are no elections for G or, other statewide officers, or US Senator. There will be a great many cc. _meted primaries for legislative offices, since 1 ill see the end of many legislators' terms due to term limits, but these primaries will be of relatively little interest to the general public. There may be relatively few ballot measures, since the Legislature would have to act by January of 1996 to place them on the ballot, but they will probably get around to placing at least a few on the ballot. Given the turnout of a great many republicans and relatively few democrats, it would probably not be a good idea to place a park and wildlife bond act on the ballot, either by initiative or through the legislature. A tax measure would probably also be difficult, although there are some which might have some appeal. The November, 1996 election, on the other hand, will have a tremendous turnout. The 1992 Presidential election saw a turnout of 11.3 million voters (75% of registered voters). In such an election there is a very high number of voters favorable to park and wildlife measures. This is one reason why Measure A (the 1992 Los Angeles County Park and Wildlife Property Tax) passed. This high turnout offers a good opportunity to ask the voters to approve a.fiscal measure in 1996. The question is: what to'ask them for. Here are some options. 1. Another bond act This is still the traditional way to pay for park and wildlife programs. It would be possible to prepare a new version of Proposition 180, perhaps smaller, and qualify it for the ballot as an initiative. Signature gathering would begin in mid to late 1995, and end in the spring of 1996. This is a more difficult time to collect signatures (the rainy season), and would require more preparation and lead time. If we proceeded with this option, we would have to give the Legislature its chance to pass a park bond act in 1995, which we could do given the timing for 1996. The danger is that they would place it on the March, 1996 ballot. We might have to oppose this, due to the danger of losing. 2. A vehicle registration fee Our polling last year showed strong support for an increase in the fee for vehicle registration, with the revenue going to park acquisition and maintenance. The public would be allowed free access to state parks as a result. This measure would have to be an initiative, since the Legislature would not earmark funds in this way. In such a measure, individual projects would not be named, so the question is whether groups would collect signatures and raise money. It might be possible to require a certain amount of the fund to be spent on land protection based on geographic distribution of funds. 3. A water tax Legislation supported by PCL two years ago would have set up a fund based on a small residential water tax, with the proceeds going to cleaning up drinking water supplies, and to protect wetlands and other water resources (streams, rivers, etc). Again, earmarking of projects would be difficult. The revenue for natural resource protection would be about$30 million a year. High voter approval was evident in a poll undertaken two years ago. 4. A habitat conservation district in Southern California, or perhaps for the entire state We could establish a special habitat conservation district in Southern California or the entire state based on a property tax which covered that region. This would have to be done in cooperation with the agencies and landowners most interested in preserving this habitat. The goal would be to provide funds to help resolve critical habitat conservation issues. These are most severe in Southern California, but could also apply to some situations in Northern California, possibly including fish species. 5. Tobacco Tax Increase In 1988 the voters approved a tobacco tax, part of which is used to fund environmental projects. This is producing about $35 million a year. The tax could be increased, resulting in more funds for park and wildlife projects. The new revenue could be as much as an additional$70 million a year or more, but would not be earmarked for particular projects. 6. Casino Gambling??? Casino Gambling is moving into California on a variety of Indian Reservations. About 17 states now have casino gambling, and it is probably coming to California. State revenue from this source would be at least a billion dollars a year. No polling has been done, but it is possible that voters would accept a tightly controlled form of gambling, with at least some of the revenue going to the environment. 7 A series of local park and wildlife funding measures Los Angeles passed such a measure in 1992. The Governor signed legislation allowing similar votes in San Diego and Sacramento Counties. Only a majority vote is required on these benefit assessment districts. The downside is that rural counties would never pass such measures, so their land protection and recreation needs would go unfulfilled. All of these are possibilities. In addition, PCL is sponsoring an initiative this fall to increase the sales tax on gasoline, producing about S700 million in new revenue, most of which will go to public transportation. However$14 million a year of these funds will go to mitigate the results of transportation development, and these funds would be available for many of the park, trail and habitat projects which Proposition 180 would have funded. We would be happy to send you more information about this measure If you wish. Just give us a call. Again, many thanks for your terrific efforts on behalf of CALPAW. We look forward to seeing you on the 8th. If you can't make it, please call one of us and let us know your thoughts. JI YES ON 180 CALPAW '94 SUPPORTING ORGAIN.LLATIONS 6/7/94 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS Police Officers Associations: CA Lifesaving Association East Palo Alto LA. Community Youth Gang Services Project Antioch Daily Ledger-Post Dispatch Oceanside LA. County Lifeguard Association Bay&Delta Yachtsman San Diego Los Banos D.A.R.E. Program Californian,the (Salinas) Torrance Californian,the (Temecula) Vallejo COUNTIES Camarillo Daily News Contra Costa Times CA State Attorney General, Alameda County County Telegram Tribune (San Luis Obispo) John Van de Kamp (Retired) Contra Costa County Daily Breeze (Torrance) Lake County Daily pilot(Costa Mesa) District Attorneys: Los Angeles County Escondido Times Advocate Arlo Smith (San Francisco) Marin County Los Angeles Times Gil Garcetti (Los Angeles) Mendocino County Los Angeles Weekly Steve White (Sacramento) Monterey County Monterey County Herald Napa County Moorpark News/Mirror Chiefs of Police: Plumes County News-Chronicle,the (Thousand Oaks) Anthony Ribera (San Francisco) Riverside County Outlook,the (Santa Monica) Bruce Dunne (Oceanside) Sacramento County Oxnard Press-Courier Burnham Matthews (Alameda) San Bernardino County Palm Springs Desert Sun Charles Hoover (Whittier) San Diego County Register-Pajaronian (Santa Cruz) Craig Steckler (Fremont) San Francisco County Riverside Press-Enterprise Daniel Nelson (Salinas) San Mateo County Sacramento News&Review Daniel Robbins (San Bernardino) Santa Clara County San Francisco Bay Guardian Daschel Butler (Berkeley) Santa Cruz County San Francisco Chronicle David Lewis (Antioch) Sonoma County San Francisco Examiner Dennis Hegwood (Rialto) Ventura County San Diego Union-Tribune Douglas Milender (Fairfield) Yolo County San Jose Mercury News Earnest Clements (Richmond) San Mateo Times Edward Davis (L.A.- Retired) CITIES San Pedro News-Pilot Edward Winchester (Fresno) San Ramon Valley Times (Danville) E.T. Deese (National City) Albany Santa Barbara News Press Frank Acosta (Milpitas) Belmont Santa Cruz Sentinel Gary Hart(Upland) Benicia Simi Valley Enterprise Harold Hurtt(Oxnard) Berkeley Tulare Advance Register James Butts Jr. (Santa Monica) Brawley Valley Times (Pleasanton) Jerry Boyd (Martinez) Brisbane Ventura County Star Free Press Jerry Sanders (San Diego) Burbank West County Times (Richmond/Pinole) John Cleghorn (Corona) Calexico John Robertson (Orange) Calimesa KCBS-AM (San Francisco) Joseph De Ladurantey (Torrance) Campbell KNX-AM (Los Angeles) Joseph Samuels Jr. (Oakland) Carlsbad Ken Fortier(Riverside) Carmel-by-the-Sea CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS Larry Hansen (Lodi) Carpinteria Lewis Nelson (Redlands) Cathedral City CA League of Conservation Voters Lloyd Wood (Pomona) Ceres CA Rural Indian Health Board Oliver Thompson (Inglewood) Chino Inland Empire Concilio De La Raze, Inc. Paul Walters (Santa Ana) Chula Vista League of Women Voters of CA Richard Breza (Santa Barbara) Covina League of Women Voters,San Diego Richard Emerson (Chula Vista) Daly City League of Women Voters of San Luis Obispo Robert Krolak (San RafaeD Cavis Los Angeles Philharmonic Asso. Robert Maginnis (San Leandro) Del Mar Lutheran Office of Public Policy Robert Vales (Carlsbad) , Desert Hot Springs MALDEF Ronald George (South Gate) Dorris Mono County Arts Council Stanley Knee (Garden Grove) Duarte NAACP,CA State Conference Stephen Port(Hawthorne) El Centro NAACP,Fresno Branch Steven Staveley (La Habra) El Cerrito NAACP, Richmond Branch Thomas Reese (Daly City) El Monte NAACP,San Diego Branch Wayne C.Clayton (El Monte) Fairfield South Laguna Civic Association Willie Williams (Los Angeles) Fremont Fresno PUBLIC SAFETY-LAW County Sheriffs: Glendale ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES Bob Martinez(Polo County) Half Moon Bay Charles Gillingham (Santa Clara) Hemet CA Organization of Police and Sheriffs Charles Prandi (Mario County) Hercules Peace Officers Research Asso of CA Dale Moore (Sonoma County) Highland Don Horsley (San Mateo County) Holtville John V. Gillespie (Ventura County, retired, Imperial Beach immediate post president of the CA State Indian Wells Sheriffs Association Indio Kerman CA Artichoke &Vegetable Growers ITW Fluid Products Lafayette CA Clean Growers K.B. Foster Civil Engineering, Inc. Laguna Beach CA Pot-Bellied Association Laguna Beach Chamber of Com. Lake Forest CA Rice Industry Association Latin Business Association La Quinta Chapman Forestry Foundation Lowe Reserve Corporation Los Altos Coast Dairies& Land Company Malibu Vista Properties, Inc. Los Altos Hills Deer Park Properties, Inc. Marin County Arborists Los Angeles Double D Land& Cattle Company Markham Aboretum Society Los Banos E. Vosti& Sons Mary Greenstein-Urban Forestry Mammoth Lakes Fialho Farms Mine Reclamation Corporation Martinez Grassland R.C.D. Monday Morning Group of Western Merced Grassland Water District Riverside County Millbrae Haywire Land &Cattle Company North Coast Co-Op Mill Valley Ishizuka Investments North Sacramento C of Com. Montebello Klamath Land &Cattle Company Outdoor Adventure Recreation Milpitas Lake County Flood Control &Water Suppliers (O.A.R.S.) Monte Sereno Conservation District Patagonia Mountain View Lucich Orchards Pejcha Trust Properties National City Marin Agricultural Land Trust Pinkerton Consultants, Inc. Nevada City Marin County Farm Bureau Plant Contractors Inc. Norco Merced County Farmland Trust Port of Oakland Novato Monterey County Ag &Historic Land Con. Riverside Downtown Association Ojai Murrietta Land& Development Co. FIST Engineering Orange Cove Riverfield Cattle Company, Inc. San Jacinto Chamber of Commerce Pacifica Riverside-Corona R.C.D. San Rafael Yacht Harbor Palmdale Rural Institute (the) Stepp's Tree Service Palm Desert Salinas Land&Cattle Company Studio of Architecture Palm Springs San Diego County Water Authority Sunrise Company Palo Alto Santini-Roccucci Thor-Lo, Inc. Petaluma San Joaquin Farmland Trust Travertine Corporation Pismo Beach Sciarini Ranch V. Saftui Winery Inc. Point Arena Solano County Farmlands Fdn. Wagner Construction Pleasant Hill Sonoma County Ag Preservation Whitewater Connection Pleasanton &Open Space District White Water Mfg., Inc. Poway Southern California Ag Land Fdn Whitewater Voyages Rancho Mirage Suisun R.C.D. Wolfe Mason Associates Rialto Turlock Cattle Company Riverside Ventura County Ag Land Trust LABOR& PROFESSIONAL Salinas Yofo Land Conservation Trust ORGANIZATIONS San Anselmo San Diego BUSINESSES & BUSINESS CA Marine Affairs&Navigation Conference San Francisco ORGANIZATIONS CA Association of Harbor Masters San Jose & Port Captains San Juan Capistrano Adventure Connection CA Association of Regional Park San Luis Obispo All Outdoors &Open Space Administrators San Mateo Alpine County Chamber of Com. CA Teachers Association San Rafael Andrea Lawrence Associates County Park&Recreation Directors Santa Ana Billy Steinberg Music Northern California Marine Asso. Santa Barbara Brandi Construction No. CA Association of River Guides Santa Clara California Outdoors Sign & Display Union (Local 510) Santa Clarfta Cambria Chamber of Commerce Santa Cruz Canyon Oaks Estates, L.P. SENIOR ORGANIZATIONS Santa Monica Carney &Co., Inc. Saratoga Chili Bar Outdoor Center XA.R.P. Thousand Oaks Community Services& Employment CA Asso of Area Agencies on Aging Tiburon Training, Inc. Congress of California Seniors Torrance Corporate & Commercial Services Council of Sacramento Seniors Ukiah Dangermond and Associates Gray Panthers of South Alameda Union City Davis Group Visalia Dockers Corporation Leisure World Clubs Walnut Creek Delta Mechanical Supply B'nai B'rith Women Watsonville Eagle Creek, Crelco Corpoation Camera Club of Laguna Hills West Hollywood EarlhTrek Expeditions Community Asso.for Residents Woodside ECHO:The Wilderness Co., Inc. Democratic Club Yountville Ecosystems Project,The Golden Rain Foundation Eifert Gallery Harmonaires,The AGRICULTURAL ORGS, EIP Associates Hearing Impaired Club COMPANIES&AGENCIES Gaia Land&Tree Care Cat Club Golden State Concessionaires Asso. Residents to Save the Canyon Accornero&Sons Investments Greater Riverside C of Com. New York Club,The American Farmland Trust Gfeenlink Republican Club Britto Land Company Irvine Company Women's Classified Service Club YOUTH ORGANIZATIONS CA Citrus SHP N.P. Oper.Corp. Sunrise CA Parks&Conservation Asso. CA Asso of Conservation Corps CA Parks & Recreation Society GOVERNMENT ENTITIES & Local Conservation Corps CA State Park Ranger Association ASSOCIATIONS East Bay Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge Fresno County Citizens for the Eastshore State Park Alameda County Flood Control Los Angeles County CSA 4D Herald Park& Rec Area Advisory &Water Conservation District Merin County 'Friends of Parks'Organizations: Alameda County Mayor's Conference Sacramento Alensworth State Park Alpine County Fish&Game Comm. San Diego Urban California Parks Association of Monterey Say Area San Francisco Chitactac-Adams Governments San Jose Greater L.A. Parks Beach Erosion Authority for Control Parks& Recreation Operations and Nourishment Rancho Los Cerritos Clean Water Program for Greater San Diego California Police Activities League Cloverdale Boulder Conelo Open Space Conservation Agency Police Activities Leagues: Folsom Powerhouse Contra Costa Water District Benicia Monterey Peninsula Regional Park Eastern Ventura County Buena Park Museum of Chinese-American Hist Conservation Agency East Palo Alto Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency Hollywood cold Discovery Park Association League of California Cities Long Beach -!arbor Regional Park Committee Los Angeles County Beach Advisory Comm Los Banos I-eague of California State Park Metropolitan Water District of Martinez Non-Profit Organizations Southern California Montebello Marconi Conference Center No.San Diego Co. Multiple Richmond Otay Valley Regional Park, Conservation Program Advisory Salinas Citizen Advisory Committee Port of Oakland Stallion Springs Park Ranger Association of CA Riverside Co Habitat Conservation Agency Stanislaus County regional Parks Association San Diego Association of Governments Vallejo Santa Susana Mountain Park Asso. San Dieguito River Valley Regional Open Willits Sunrise Recreation & Park Fdn. Space Park Joint Powers Authority Reno, Nevada San Joaquin River Conservancy PARK& RECEATION DEPTS. Santa Clarita Watershed Recreation& Bonita Vista Middle School (Earthlings) Conservation Authority Chadwick School Ecology Club Benicia Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Keep Youth Doing Something Chula Vista Visalia Beautification Committee LA.Community Youth Gang Services Project Davis Visalia Environmental Committee Los Banos D.A.R.E. Folsom Visalia Park&Rec Commission Huntington Beach Western Riverside Council of Governments EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS LA., Beaches&Harbors Montebello ELECTED OFFICIALS California Teachers Association Novato Center for Conservation&Education Riverside City Slate Officers: Strategies San Bernardino County Controller, Gray Davis Center for Regenerative Studies Santa Barbara County Insurance Commissioner,John Garamendi (C.S. Polytechnic University) Santa Clarita Treasurer, Kathleen Brown Enviro. Education Farm Fdn. Sonoma County Chair, Board of Equalization, Brad Sherman Grassland Conservation&Education Fund Stanislaus County Inter-American Research Corp. Congressional Members: Mountains Education Program PARK& REC DISTRICTS Anthony Beilenson (Woodland Hills) Pacific Enviro. Education Ctr Bob Filner (San Diego) Planning&Conservation League Fouclation Arden Manor Howard Berman (Mission Hills) Riverside Council P.T.A. Arden Park Lucille Roybal-Allard (LA.) Tri-City Ecology Center Carmichael Sam Farr(Monterey) Coachella Valley NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS -onejo State Senators: Cordova Art Torres (Los Angeles) Corral Canyon Homeowners Asso. cast Bay Charles Calderon (Los Angeles) Fairbanks Ranch Association EI Dorado Herschel Rosenthal (Los Angeles) Fdr. of Hillside&Canyon Assos. Elk Grove Milton Marks (San RafaeD Halcyon Neighborhood Association Feather River Nicholas Petris (Oakland) Sycamore Creek Homeowners Asso. Futton-El Camino Ralph Dills (Gardena) Tahoe Meadows Homeowners AM. Herald Robert Presley (Riverside) Tarzana Property Owners Asso. MiclPeninsula Regional Torrey Pines Association Mission Oaks Assemblymembers: Upper Lee Street Property Owners Monterey Peninsula Burt Margolin (Los Angeles) West Blithedale Cyn Neighborhood North Highlands Debra Bowen (Torrance) Orangevale Delaine Eastin (Fremont) PARK& REC SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS Otay Valley Grace Napolitano (Norwalk) Pleasant Hill Johan Klehs (San Leandro) Alameda-Contra Costa Regional Parks Fdn. Rancho Simi Mike Gotch (San Diego) Ambrose Recreation &Park District San Carlos Richard Polanco (Los Angeles) Belmont Park Boosters Southgate Robert Campbell (Martinez) Stan Statham (Redding) Agua Cali4:nte Cultural Museum Los Angeles Chapter Terry Friedman (Encino) American River Natural History Ass Madrone Chapter Tom Bates (Oakland) Angel Island Immigration Station Marin Chapter Tom Connolly (Lemon Cove) Antelope Valley Archaeological Soc Moro Coast Chapter Paul Woodruff (Moreno Valley) Archaeological Conservancy Mount Diablo Chapter Bay Area Rock Art Research Asso Napa-Solano Chapter County Supervisors: CA Academy of Sciences Ohlone Chapter Don Perata(Alameda) CA Council for the Promotion of History Pasadena Chapter Gloria Molina(Los Angeles) CA Historical Society Pomona Valley Chapter Pam Slater(San Diego) CA Preservation Foundation Redbud Chapter Rex Bloomfield (Placer) Chico Anthropological Society Sacramento Chapter Illa Collins (Sacramento) Citizens for Historic Murrieta San Bernardino Valley Chapter Cultural Heritage Council San Diego Chapter City Councilmembers: Gabrielino-Tongva Tribal Council San Fernando Valley Chapter Evelyn Hart(Newport Beach) Intertribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council Santa Clara Valley Chapter Hal Bernson (L03 Angeles) Imperial County Historical Society Santa Monica Bay Chapter Laura Pearson (Riverside) Latino Museum of History,Art and Culture Sea&Sage Chapter Laurie Oberhottzer(Nevada City) Los Angeles County Museum of Art Sierra Foothills Chapter Paul Koretz (West Hollywood) Museum of Vintage Fashion South Coast Chapter Richard Alatorre (Los Angeles) National Trust for Historic Preservation Ventura Chapter Ron Roberts (San Diego) Paradise Historical Society Wake, North Carolina Chapter Riverside Cultural Heritage Board Mayors: Sacramento Archaeological Society Back Country Land Trust Jean Waft(Newport Beach) San Diego Archaeological Society Ballona Lagoon Marine Perserve Joe Some (Sacramento) Santa Clara Co.Archaeological Society Say Area I-And Watch John Pena (La Quinta) Santa Cruz Archaeological Society Say Area Ridge Trails Council Ron Loveridge (Riverside) Society for California Archaeology Bay Area Trails Preservation Council Bay Victor Lopez (Orange Cove) Suisun Marsh Natural History Assn Institute of San Francisco,the Tehachapi Heritage League Museum Bicycle Trails Council of Marin URBAN ORGANIZATIONS Tuolumne County Historical Society Big Sur Land Trust Victoria Avenue Forever Solsa Chica Land Trust CA Asso of Bicycle Organizations Yolo County Historical Society Brawley Three Trails Support Group Californians for Population Stab. CA Alpine Club Train Riders Association of CA SPORTSMEN ASSOCIATIONS CA Animal Defense League CA Native Plant Society, Statewide POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONS B &D Gustine Club CNPS Local Chapters: CA Trout Bristlecone Chapter CA Democratic Party: CA Waterfowl Association Channel Islands Chapter Statewide Carmel River Steelhead Association Dorothy King Young Chapter Environmental Caucus Central Valley Joint Venture Committee East Bay Chapter 14th A.D. DDD Duck Club Marin Chapter El Dorado Co. Central Committee Ducks Unlimited Milo Baker Chapter Placer Co.Central Committee Federation of Fly Fishers Monterey Bay Chapter San Diego County Central Comm. Foster City Rod &Gun Club North San Joaquin Valley Chapter Leisure World Club High Sierra Fly Casters Redbud Chapter Lake Tahoe Club Ramona Hunting Club San Diego Chapter 101 Duck Club, Inc. San Luis Obispo Chapter Green Party: Sanhedrin Chapter Alameda County CONSERVATION-ORGS Santa Clara Valley Chapter Contra Costa County South Coast Chapter San Joaquin County Action for Animals Yerba Buena Chapter South Bay Advocates for Animals Ague Hedionda Lagoon Foundation CA Oaks Foundation HORSE ASSOCIATIONS Albion Residents Association CA Save our Streams Council Alpine Land Conservancy Chino Hills Land Conservancy E.T.I.Corral 16 American Land Conservancy Citizens Comm to Save Elysian Park Horsemen's Asso of Sleepy Hollow America's Oceans Campaign Citizens for a Vehicle Free Nipomo Dunes Horsepower Sanctuaries, Inc. American River Land Trust Citizens for Open Space Redwings Horse Sanctuary Amigos de Bolsa Chica Citizens for Urban Wilderness Area South County Horsemen's Asso Anderson Valley Land Trust Citizens Planning Association Animal Emancipation Inc. Civic Gardens Foundation RECREATION ASSOCIATIONS Anza Borrego Foundation Coachella Valley Hiking Club Atascadero Land Preservation Society Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy Laguna Hills Tennis Club Atascadero Native Tree Association Coachella Valley Trails Council Marina Recreation Association Auburn Park Conservancy Coast Action Group Santa Clara Amateur Softball Asso. Audubon Society National Coastwalk Audubon Society Local Chapters: Committee to Protect the General Plan of HISTORICAL&CULTURAL PRESERVATIN Buena Vista Chapter La Habra Heights ORGANIZATIONS El Dorado Chapter Contra Costa Hills Club Golden Gate Chapter Cottonwood Creek Conservancy American Society for Preservation of African Kern Chapter Cuyamaca Conservancy American History Laguna Hills Chapter East Bay Citizens for Creek Restoration Deep Creek Open Space Coalition Martinez Regional Land Trust Save San Francisco Bay Association Defenders of Wildlife Mattole Restoration Council Save San Pablo Baylands Desert Tortoise Preserve Committee Earth Mendocino County Releaf Save the Gray Whale Parklands island Institute Mill Creek Watershed Conservancy Save the Redwoods League Eastern Sierra Citizens for the Mill Valley Open Space Committee Sempervirens Fund Protection of Bodie Mono Lake Committee Sierra Club Calffornia cology Center of Southern CA More Mesa Foundation Sierra Club Local Chapters: Endangered Habitats League Mount Konocti Preservation Fdn Angeles Chapter Enviro Action Comm of West Merin Mountain Lion Foundation 20s &30s Singles Group Enviro,Coalition of Ventura County Mountains Conservancy Foundation Central Group Enviromental Council of Sacramento Mountains Restoration Trust Long Beach Group Environmental Defense Center Murrieta Greenways Los Serranos Group Environmental Forum of Marin Natural Resources Services Mount Baldy Group Environmental Trust,the Nature Conservancy Orange County Group Escondido Creek Conservancy Nevada County Land Trust Orange County Group Fallbrook Land Conservancy Newport Conservancy,The Santa Clarita Valley Group 'Friends of Organizations: North Fork American River Council Sierra Sage of So.Orange Co. Alamos District N.C. Cir for Biodiversity &Sustainability Kern-Kaweah Chapter Albany Hill Ojai Valley Land Conservancy Loma Prieta Chapter Alhambra Creek Ormond Beach Observers Guadalupe Group Brookside Meadow Pacifica Land Trust Gabilan Regional Group Desert Mountains Palomar Park Garden Club Los Padres Chapter Dunes Palos Veroes Peninsula Land Con Sespe Group Estuary at Morro Bay Parks and Preserves Foundation Motherlocle Chapter Famosa Slough Parks,Open Space, and Trails Sacramento Valley Group Franklin Hills Peninsula Conservation Center Fdn Maidu Group Garcia Peninsula Open Space Trust Redwood Chapter Hope Valley Peninsula Releaf/Magic Inc. Mendocino/Lake Group Indian Canyons People for Nipoma Dunes Nat. Seashore Napa Group Lake Calaveras People for Parks San Diego Chapter Los Angeles River Pet Adoption League San Francisco Bay Chapter Los Penasquitos Canyon Placer Conservation Force San Gorgonio Chapter Monterey County Wildlife Placer Land Trust Mojave Group Northern San Jacinto Valley Planning and Conservation League San Bernardino Mnts Group Ridgeline Preserve Our Plateau Santa Lucia Chapter River Putah Creek Council Range of Light Group (roiyabe) Russian River Quail Botanical Gardens Foundation Santa Cruz Group (Ventura) San Dieguito River Valley Quail Ridge Wilderness Conservancy Santa Clara River Redwood Coast Land Conservancy Sierra Madre Environmental Action Santa Margarita River Redwood Community Action Agency Sierra Nevada Alliance Sycamore Canyon Releaf Costa Mesa Snipes-Pershing Ravine Coalition Tecate Cypress Restoring the Bay Campaign Sonoma County Releaf Ventura River Riverside Land Conservancy Sonoma Land Trust Rural Canyons Conservation Fund South Fork (Kern)Watershed Asso =uncl for Animals Inc. Rural Quality Coalition South Yuba River Citizens League Gardena Beautification Committee Sacramento Open Space Southwest Wetlands Interpretive Glendora Community Conservancy Sacramento River Parkway Advoc Spirit of the Sage Council Goleta Beautiful, Inc. Sacramento River Preservation Trust Stanislaus Natural Heritage Project Greenbelt Alliance Sacramento Urban Creek Council Stone Lakes Refuge Alliance Greenspace Land Trust Sacramento Valley Open Space Con Suisun Conservation Fund Health and Habitat Salmonid Restoration Federation Surfrider Foundation Heritage Areas Association,the San Anselmo Open Space Comm Surfrider Foundation, Malibu Hermosa Releaf San Diegans for Parks&Wildlife Tamalpais Conservation Club Hills For Everyone San Elijo Lagoon Conservancy Tonner Canyon Wilderness Conservancy Inverness Association San Francisco Say Trail Project Tony LaRussa's Animal Rescue Foundation is Time for a Park S.F. Friends of the Urban Forest Tree Fresno Jacoby Creek Land Trust San Joaquin River Committee Tri-County Conservation League Keep the Sespe Wild Committee San Joaquin River Parkway Truckee Donner Land Trust *<am River Bike Path Committee San Luis Obispo Land Conservancy Trust for Public Land Kern River Parkway Committee Sanctuary Forest Union for a River Greenbelt Enviroment Laguna Canyon Conservancy Santa Barbara County Releaf United Animal Nations Laguna Canyon Foundation Santa Monica Mtns Trails Council Urban Creeks Council, S.F. Laguna Greenbelt Santa Susana Mountains Park Asso Urban Creeks Council, Santa Barbara Land Trust of Santa Cruz County Santiago Creek Greenway Alliance Voican Mountain Preserve Fdn :.and Trust Santa Barbara Save Albany Hill Trust Fund Watsonville Wetlands Watch Land Utilization Trust Save Ellwood Shores W. Contra Costa Conservation Leag Committee to Save Old St Hillary's O.S. Save Mount Diablo Westhaven Community Dev Council :vague for Coastal Protection Save Open Space Wildcat/San Pablo Creeks Design League to Save Lake Tahoe Save Our Coastline 2000 William Penn Mott Memorial Meadow L.A. Urban Wilderness Coalition Save Our Forest Association Xerces Society Los Encinitos Heritage Conservancy Save Our Forests & Ranch Yolo Basin Foundation Marin Conservation League Save Our Mountains. Inc. Yolo Enviro. Resource Center R L S FOR IA%KIND CON7 RIB UTIO, 1. Please complete the to-Kind Contrihurion rnrm (Non-Afonrrary) for all donations even if less than $100 in I value. 2. Generally, anything of value,such as the granting of discounts or rebates not extended to the general public, donated items to be sold at an auction or garage sale, donated office space of furniture,use of an automobile or airplane, use of telephones or photocopy equipment,or food or refreshments for fundraising events, must be reported. In addition, compensation paid to an employee who spends more than 10% of his or her compensated time in a calendar month must be reported as a non-monetary('in-kind")contribution from the employer. 3. Voluntary personal services are not considered contributions to federal, state or local candidates and are not reportable or subject to limits. For California state and local candidates, unreimbursed travel expenses paid by a volunteer for his or her own travel are not reportable. 'The same is true for the cost of a fundraiser hosted in an individual's home or office if the cost of the event is $500 or less. For federal candidates, an individual may spend up to$1,000 per election for his or her transportation expenses on behalf of a candidate. Further,an individual may spend up to S 1,000 per election for food,beverages and invitations to a fundraiser in their home in connection with supporting a federal candidate. 4. The fair market valuq of an item or service must he reported as the amount of the non-monetary contribution. The fair market value is determined by whatever it would cost the candidate or committee to purchase the item, not necessarily the cost to the contributor of provi,ling the item. If a discount in the price of goods or services is provided to a candidate or committee, the amount of the discount must be reported as a non- monetary contribution from the provider of the goods or services. For unique items which are difficult to value,the value may he based on a good faith estimate. 5. Persons or PACs making an in-kind contribution are subject to applicable contribution limitatio.s. The value of In-kind contributions is added to any monetary contributions or loans for purposes of disclosure and contribution limits. IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION FORM (NON-AIONBTAR fir) COMMi iT EE: DONOR: rw..raFl rnnniritl » J nrnni mr rnrm iF DONOR IS iNDiVIDUAL: ftx't't'rnTlr)!'1 "JJJ nyrR-If Ulf FlIMP)I"1).Mn,rr or nutwm%) iF DONOR IS COMMITTEE: rrrn-1 n NI,u 7, DESCRIPTION OF GOODS OR SERVICES DONATED:-- FAIR MARKET VALUE:• DATE OF CONTRIBUTION: • THE FAiR MARKET VALUE iS WHATEVER iT WOULD COST TO OBTAIN THE DONATED GOODS OR SERVICES ON THE OPEN MARKET, AND NOT NECESSARILY THE COST TO THE DONOR OF PROVIDING TIIE GOODS OR SERVICES. PI�dSFtA7SAr't ANY R Ctz iPTS�INv��� OR OTItER DOtti-tME AIM As you saw on the precedir age we have included yet annuli, Tt Kind C:ontribuf icln lot to for your use. This should L,..er the Period from May 22nd to Present and needs to he filled out and returned so the campaign can file its final report with the 17-1111(:. We have also enclosed the following editorial from the LA "1 inlr_s, Friday June 10, 1994, for your enjoyment and ask you to disburse the information of this letter to your members and to thank them once again for their valiant efforts. From all of us, Jerry Meral Lynn Sadler Tim Uunhar John HotTCll Jamie Phillips Dani Petly 0Pe-n1_,-SpakX' Battle Lost, Wan Go(... on Sd&ck at pops m&for even.more determination and crativity among cvnYe"ationists The reckon made it more dlMcult ' Wonka Mountatna_ Now its executive final 189 acres, whirl still =rcdv- for deveopers to get money to build 'director says it and a sister agency .-ahly could Wind up as the site of I—SW hoases and made them more wtlling w•1a have to tay aff warkrss and put houses. to sell their land to groups wanting to property purchamm on hold. The ' Although t:ie specift plots of land '. preserve it as open space. However, Conservancy also will have to come for these two major s are of this same economic slowdown trade• up with newly ss million to complete course mcst accessible to residents of ; voters unwilling to incur more debt to Its purchase of Canyon Oa m FTtates I.ag=,a Peach.and Topanga.,they and buy the fields, Lakes and canyorm in Topanga Canyom mmitar parcels are assets to the entire That is wholly understandablk, . And L24gtma Brach was counting an regiom filkers front San Bernardino u Eves so, Tuesday's rejection of P opoattian M to provide S25 mil- trek in the Santa Monica Mcun-tains; proposiUnn In the Catifcu.tia parks Lives6 the bulk of a s3-mtlIk+n final San Diego residents and tourizts enjoy and Wildlife Initiative, was an espe- pVment due the Irvine Ca next year the Lagtsa Beach coast and canyons. daily hard blow to Laguna Beach and tar i marvelous 2,1W*ae property It is time for initiattve barkers to the Santa Monica Mountains Con- known as Laguna Laurel_About 1,5W huddle with property owners to see seivancy..But neither shouted throw in kcal voltmteers, an impressive num- what can be worked out An Irvine the towel on worthwhile pra*ts bee', gathered egnatmvs to grt the Co. executive accurately labeled La- , because of the setback at.the pails.It initiative on the ballat and worked to gtma Laurel proponents "esourceful is time again to approach private K41cft voter support . and determined people"So are Santa : donors and to look even harder for LaVma Laurel would be part of a. Monica Mountains Ccrserraaey sup- _ federal and state hands. wilderness park stretching several porters. The fnitiative's defeat cost the San-. miles inland-from the coast Laguna Voters may have felt tamed out in to Mcmea Mountains Conservancy Beach already has paid most of the the face of a $2-billion initiative, but more than 485 million sought for the $78-milllon purchase prim+ but need- this is no time for supporters of parks acquisition of open land in the Santa ed help from the initiative to buy the and Wilde^ ess to just fold their tents_ 2Z076 V0 s011V sal al��l� lalslo 0££ latilsta aoedg uadp leuol6aa elnsuluadp!w U011pe 6leJo Mb� I f 90 t S.1 t• �cc� ,.,,tt�,ttUa,ts 1?�k}13 i 9 iZ b an:;t�'1 uailutia?;tics pus�It!nttrr:;�l•�LtL irpnln^Inr.nilryry l Y sppgl aoueO THE LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT j- LOGAN 152 NORTH THIRD ST.,SIM 201 SAN JOSE, CA 95112.5516 TELEPHONE 408.287.2156 FACSIMILE 408.280.1749 June 13, 1994 Ms. Ginny Babbitt, President MROSD Board of Directors 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022-1404 RE: Mt Umunhum Use and Ownership Issues Dear President Babbitt: Thank you for your June 3, 1994 letter regarding the McQueen interests on Mt. Umunhum. I had been assured by your General Manager of the same matters you set out in your letter. Rather than focus on the potential conflict, we are also more interested in pursuing mutual opportunities associated with the various land holdings in the Umunhum area. In the spirit of that future cooperation, we have granted limited easements to allow remediation of the GATR site on Mt. Thayer. I am somewhat perplexed by the inquiry you have made about the "water tank and land reverted" to McQueen upon departure of the Air Force. Had you checked District records you would have seen correspondence from the Army Corps of Engineers to McQueen dated June 12, 1991, stating that ownership of the tank was vested in McQueen on June 30, 1985. You should also be aware that no land reverted, since the land upon which the tank sits has always belonged to McQueen. What you refer to as an "assertion" is not an assertion, but a fact. With a little homework, you should have been aware of this. I hope your comment arises from a failure to look at your records and does not foreshadow future and unnecessary attempts by the District to make unreasonable claims related to my client's property. I hope that the District and my client can continue to move forward in a positive direction. jRoJ. yours, RJL/fg Logan MCQUEEN\MROSD\BABBIT.LET\6.13.94fg 1JUN 1 1994 lk co A% 18 AGRICULTURE INDUSTRY R T ECREAION THE SONOMA COUNTY GRAND JURY LIFOR 600 ADMINISTRATION DRIVE * ROOM 228,J 9 SANTA ROSA • CALIFORNIA 95401 0 (707) 527-3091 .[Line 14, 1994 Mid-Peninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022 Dear Sir, The Sonoma Comity Grand Jury is conducting a study of open space districts. An important part of this study is the collection of data from existing open space districts within California. It would be very helpful to the grand jury's project if you could provide 0ie following information concerning your district: 1. The number of years the district has been in existence. 2. The total dollar amount paid for property and/or land rights acquisition per year since inception. 1 The total number of acres acquired per year since inception. I-. Percentage of acquisition acreage designated as: community separator active recreational usage • passive(low impact) recreational usage S. The administrative costs of the district per year since 1991. 6. District resources and firading. 7. Please send us a copy of your Acquisition Plan if it is available. We greatly appreciate your efforts in helping us with this study. We look forward to hearing from you soon. Very sincerely 1�6'y V,obert Off, Foreman 1994 Sonoma County Grand Jury I 0/jg Open Space MiDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MEMORANDUM June 17, 1994 TO: Legislative, Finance, and Public Affairs Committee FROM: M. Foster, Controller SUBJECT: Investment Status I The yield on the County pooled fund, 4 . 13% as of May 31, 1994, is now lower than general market investment rates. Therefore, I have shifted $4 million to sixty day commercial paper at a rate of 4. 38%. Our cash position is adequate to cover all foreseeable near-term cash requirements. cc: M. McGough, Accounting Specialist I i MROSD INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - JUNE 17 , 1994 Issue COMMERCIAL PAPER (Ford, American Express) , $ 3,969,808 due 8/15/94, yielding 4 .38% SANTA CLARA COUNTY POOLED $ 3,394,892 INVESTMENT FUND (4 . 13% on 5/31/94) 1987 NOTE RESERVE FUND (U.S. Treasury Securities of various maturities yielding about 3 . 1%) 1,696,000 1988 NOTE RESERVE FUND (Bankers Acceptance yielding 3 . 1%) 750,000 1990 NOTE RESERVE FUND (Various securities yielding about 4 . 8%) 1,200,000 1992 NOTE RESERVE FUND (Various securities yielding about 6%) 640,000 1993 COP RESERVE FUND (Various U.S. Treasury securities yielding about 7. 0%) 1,349,300 $13,000,000 Open Space t MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT I TO: Board of Directors FROM: C. Britton, General Manager DATE: June 17, 1994 SUBJECT: FYI i 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022-1404 Phone: 415-691-1200 FAX: 415-691-0485 Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit Genera/Manager:L.Craig;Britton Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT June 8, 1994 David W. Knapp, Town Manager Town of Los Gatos P. O. Box 949 Los Gatos, CA 95031 Subject: St. Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve - Reopening of the Historic "Jones Road" Trail Dear Dave, Ever since the District and the Town of Los Gatos first acquired the Novitiate property in October 1984, the closing of the historic "Jones Road" trail reduced the potential for full public access to the then created St. Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve. The alternative trail, constructed by the District, is narrow and steep with blind corners and had to be designated as the lone "walk only" trail zone within the District. This was done to slow runners and cyclists along a trail segment that is difficult for various users to pass each other easily. As one can imagine, compliance has been very difficult to enforce. Over the last year or so,.District staff has worked with Town staff to see if additional land could be acquired from the Novitiate to include the area of the historic Jones Road trail. This would permit the reopening of the original road alignment, which would be wide enough to accommodate the various trail user groups without the restriction of "walking" only. The existing trail could then remain open for hikers and enforcement would be much easier and more effective and public safety would be much improved. As a result of working with a very cooperative seller, the Novitiate representatives executed an option agreeing to sell the 0.8 acres for $5,000 to the District and the Town. Since preservation of this area has always been a cooperative effort, the District hopes that the Town would continue to be a partner, at least to the extent of reopening this historic road (trail) alignment. On this basis, it is also assumed that we would hold joint title to the land, as we do with the balance of the preserve. I have attached a summary of the costs for reopening the Jones Road trail, at a total of $60,000. The District proposal would be to share this cost equally. I have also attached a copy of the comprehensive use and management plan for the entire preserve. This plan has costs that are n 'v 1 adopted b our Board of Directors. The total out-of-pocket been to tati c y r y facing the District amount to $121,000, including a CalTrans mitigation grant. Therefore, we are only asking for the Town to contribute to the Jones Road project in the amount of $30,000, while the District will not only be matching that,amount (and guaranteeing any 330 Distel Circle • Los Altos, California 9.4022-1404 • Phone: 415-691-1200 • FAX: 415-691-0485 Board of Directors:Pete Siemens,Robert McKibbin,Teena Henshaw,Ginny Babbitt,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit General Manager:L.Craig Britton Page 2 overage), but also committing a minimum of an additional $60,000 of District funds for improvements that will be spent on the preserve over the next two years. The District sincerely appreciates the Town's support and monetary contributions to the preservation of public open space in the Los Gatos community and surrounding areas in cooperation with the District. The St. Joseph's Hill Open Space Preserve is an excellent example of a partnership between public agencies, and it is my hope that we can complete this final "missing" element of the trail system on a shared basis. S ncerely, g Britto�n =.,/ General Manager LCB:snd cc: MROSD Board of Directors Memo May 9, 1994 TO: Randy, Craig FROM: Sheryl SUBJECT: Preliminary Cost Estimates for Reopening of Jones Trail 1. LAND AQUISITION (Cost: $5, 000) This would cover acquisition costs for the 0 . 8 acres of Novitiate property needed to reopen trail . 2 . CHAINLINK FENCE (Cost: $32, 500) This is based on removing exisiting fencing and installing about 1, 800 feet of new fence . Cost Breakdown: $16 . 00 per linear foot to install new fencing $2 . 00 per linear foot to remove exisiting fence Estimates are based on the specifications listed below. We will be able to get a more realistic estimate once the trail/road is open and contractors can actually see what the project entails . In 1985 we paid $19 . 00 per linear foot for installation of about $6, 000 feet at St . Joseph' s Hill . Vehicle access should be better for this job. 61 high chainlink fence 3 strands of barb wire at the top 1 strand of barb wire at the bottom Above ground height (total of 71411 ) End posts set in concrete Line posts tamped into soil 611 space between ground and chainlink where possible No gates Heavy brush in places Portions of fence may be on side hill 1-10 ft from dirt road Dirt road access to fence site 2 . DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF FLUME (Cost $2,500) This would cover the costs associated with removal of any remnants of the flume on the section that runs along the eastern boundary of Novitiate Park (excluding the preserved historic flume section) . This includes some minor regrading work. 3 . REOPENING OF TRAIL (Cost $20, 000) This would cover the costs associated with reopenning the trail to an 8 foot width where feasible . Probably at least 75% of the trail would be 8 foot wide . The remaining sections would be 6 foot wide . The project would include extensive brushing, grading, and some retaining wall work. Our crew could work with Lou Bordie, (or other contractor) to complete the work. TOTAL PROJECT COSTS: $60, 000 Claims No. 94-12 Meeting 94-18 Date: June 22, 1994 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT # Amount Name Description 6037 220.84 Acme& Sons Sanitation Sanitation Services 6038 269.64 All Laser Service Equipment Supplies 6039 7.36 American Welding Supply Welding Tank Part 6040 79.52 Randy Anderson Private Vehicle Expense 6041 420.32 Best Impressions District Logo Pens 6042 122.00 Bill's Towing & Recovery Vehicle Towing 6043 7,650.00 Louis Bordi General Engineering Grading and Discing 6044 124.57 R. E. Borrmann's Steel Company Steel Tubes 6045 806.25 Building Abatement Analytics Consulting Services 6046 189.74 California Water Service Company Water Service 6047 67.76 ClarWs Auto Parts/Machine Shop Vehicle Parts 6048 45.42 Edward Corekin Plumbing Repairs--Enterprise 6049 6,000.00 Deloitte&Touche Partial Payment--Audit 6050 215.00 Earth Systems Consultants Consulting Services 6051 118.75 John Escobar Reimbursement--Training Expenses 6052 633.26 Expedite Graphic Products Signs 6053 104.75 Farrelle Communications Radio Cases 6054 58.00 Federal Express Corporation Express Mail 6055 19.04 G & K Services Shop Towel Service 6056 556.89 Gardenland Power Equipment Field Equipment and Repairs 6057 4,573.57 Jeda Publications Printing--Annual Report and Brochures 6058 1,195.22 Dennis Kobza& Associates, Inc. Architectural Services 6059 49.02 Judy Law Private Vehicle Expense 6060 100.00 Los Altos Chamber of Commerce Mailing Labels 6061 130.00 Los Altos Garbage Company Dumpster Rental 6062 391.92 Magnussen Buick-Pontiac-GMC,Inc. Vehicle Repairs 6063 223.00 McGrath RentCorp Skyline Ranger Office Rental 6064 50.00 Menlo Park Chamber of Commerce Mailing Labels 6065 88.87 -Moffett Supply Company Sanitation Supplies 6066 168.87 Monogram Sanitation Sanitation Supplies 6067 75.00 Mountain View Chamber of Commerce Mailing Labels 6068 494.47 Minton's Lumber and Supply Lumber and Field Supplies 6069 196.14 National Glass Windshield Replacement 6070 2,860.00 -- National Mailing Services Postage On-Line Service 6071 23.40 NetCom 6072 381.99 Noble Ford Tractor, INc. Vehicle Parts and Repairs 6073 265.39 Office Depot Office Supplies 6074 428.99 Orchard Supply Hardware Field Supplies 6075 1,304.72 Pacific Bell Telephone Service 6076 45.00 Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce Mailing Labels 6077 550.00 Town of Portola Valley Paragliding Review and Planning 6078 1,000-00 Postage by Phone Postage * Urgent check issued on June 9, 1994. "Urgent check issued on June 16, 1994. Page 1 | ' | / Claims No. 94' 2 i Meeting94-18 | Date: June22. 19@4 | &8|OPEN|NSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT | # Amount Name Description -_ - --- Precision Engravers - es | 0080 32.50 Rayne Water Conditioning Water Service 6081 2.492.82 Roys Repair Service Vehicle Maintenance and Repairs ' 6082 300.42 S&VV Equipment Company Equipment Repair and Parts | ' 8003 79.98 °° Safeway Provisions for Rancho Open House | 8084 900.00 Santa Clara County Health Department Perm it-'HazmrduusMaterial � 6085 177.38 Security Iron Automatic Gate System 6086 50.00 Sunnyvale Chamber cfCommerce Mailing Labels � 6087 70.00 Sunnyvale Medical Clinic Hepatitis Vaccine--Ranger | 0088 113.49 Summit Uniforms Uniform Expense � 6089 209.88 Two R.yN.'s Sales&Service Field Equipment | GOgO 2.009.30 Whitmore, Johnson & Bp|onos Legal Services ' 6091 234.12 The Workingman's Emp orium Uniform Expense � ' 8092 71.61 Ymndbind Equipment Sales Field Equipment 6093 50.00 Joan Young Reimbursement--Professional Dues "Urgent check issued on June 16. 1994. Page 2 � � � � � � i � Claims No. 94-12 Meeting 94-18 Date: June 22, 1994 REVISED MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT # Amount Name Description 6037 220.84 Acme&Sons Sanitation Sanitation Services 6038 269.64 All Laser Service Equipment Supplies 6039 7.36 American Welding Supply Welding Tank Part 6040 79.52 Randy Anderson Private Vehicle Expense 6041 420.32 Best Impressions District Logo Pens 6042 122.00 Bill's Towing & Recovery Vehicle Towing 6043 7,650.00 Louis Bordi General Engineering Grading and Discing 6044 124.57 R. E. Borrmanrl's Steel Company Steel Tubes 6045 806.25 Building Abatement Analytics Consulting Services 6046 189.74 California Water Service Company Water Service 6047 67.76 Clark's Auto Parts/Machine Shop Vehicle Parts 6048 45.42 Edward Corekin Plumbing Repairs--Enterprise 6049 6,000.00 Deloitte&Touche Partial Payment--Audit 6050 215.00 Earth Systems Consultants Consulting Services 6051 118.75 John Escobar Reimbursement--Training Expenses 6052 633.26 Expedite Graphic Products Signs 6053 104.75 Farrelle Communications Radio Cases 6054 58.00 Federal Express Corporation Express Mail 6055 19.04 G & K Services Shop Towel Service 6056 556.89 Gardenland Power Equipment Field Equipment and Repairs 6057 4,573.57 Jeda Publications Printing--Annual Report and Brochures 6058 1,195.22 Dennis Kobza &Associates, Inc. Architectural Services 6059 49.02 Judy Law Private Vehicle Expense 6060 100.00 Los Altos Chamber of Commerce Mailing Labels 6061 130.00 Los Altos Garbage Company Dumpster Rental 6062 391.92 Magnussen Buick-Pontiac-GMC,Inc. Vehicle Repairs 6063 223.00 McGrath RentCorp Skyline Ranger Office Rental 6064 50.00 Menlo Park Chamber of Commerce Mailing Labels 6065 88.87 Moffett Supply Company Sanitation Supplies 6066 168.87 Monogram Sanitation Sanitation Supplies 6067 75.00 Mountain View Chamber of Commerce Mailing Labels 6068 494.47 Minton's Lumber and Supply Lumber and Field Supplies 6069 196.14 National Glass Windshield Replacement 6070 2,860.00 National Mailing Services Postage 6071 23.40 NetCom On-Line Service 6072 381.99 Noble Ford Tractor, INc. Vehicle Parts and Repairs 6073 265.39 Office Depot Office Supplies 6074 428.99 Orchard Supply Hardware Field Supplies 6075 1,304.72 Pacific Bell Telephone Service 6076 45.00 Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce Mailing Labels 6077 550.00 Town of Portola Valley Paragliding Review and Planning 6078 1,000.00 Postage by Phone Postage Urgent check issued on June 9, 1994. "Urgent check issued on June 16, 1994. Page 1 Claims No. 94-12 Meeting 94-18 Date: June 22, 1994 REVISED MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT # Amount Name Description 6079 9.62 Precision Engravers Name Badges 6080 32.50 Rayne Water Conditioning Water Service 6081 2,492.82 Roy's Repair Service Vehicle Maintenance and Repairs 6082 308.42 S&W Equipment Company Equipment Repair and Parts 6083 79.98 Safeway Provisions for Rancho Open House 6084 300.00 Santa Clara County Health Department Permit--Hazardous Material 6085 177.38 Security Iron - Automatic Gate System 6086 50.00 Sunnyvale Chamber of Commerce Mailing Labels 6087 70.00 Sunnyvale Medical Clinic Hepatitis Vaccine--Ranger 6088 113.49 Summit Uniforms Uniform Expense 6089 209.88 Two R.M.'s Sales&Service Field Equipment 6090 2,009.30 Whitmore, Johnson & Bolonos Legal Services 6091 234.12 The Workingman's Emporium Uniform Expense 6092 71.61 Yardbird Equipment Sales Field Equipment 6093 50.00 Joan Young Reimbursement--Professional Dues 6094 3,160.00 Santa Clara County Permits--Skyline Ranger Facility 6095 100.00 Festival Productions Display Site Fee 6096 92.41 Second Cup Training Expenses 6097 124.48 Nucleus Fast Fashion Volunteer Uniform Expense 6098 240.00 Rachel Oppedahl Consulting Services 6099 110.00 Sue Stanley Secretarial Services Secretarial Services 6100 325.34 Petty Cash Film and Developing, Local and Out- of-Town Meeting Expense, Field and Office Supplies, Equipment Repair and Private Vehicle Expense Urgent check issued on June 16, 1994. Urgent check issued on June 20, 1994. ****Urgent check issued on June 21, 1994. Page 2