HomeMy Public PortalAbout07 July 11, 1978 TC MinutesTfIE TOWN OF YARRO`N POINT
The regular meeting of the Council of. the Town of Yarrow Point was held on
July 11, 1978 at the Towle office at 7:30 I', M. Those in attendance were
Mayor Minor C. Lile,,Councilmembers Robert Becklund, Juanita Loder, Dr. Melvin
Freeman, Carson Wheeler, and Jeanne Whiting, Building Official and Engineer
Allen Newbill, Town Attorney Ronald Dickinson, Chief Albert Anglin, Chairman
of: the Planning Commission Dr. Donald Klopfer and Clerk/Treasurer Lorraine Diede.
Others in attendance were Davicl Brown, George "lead, John Ebel, Dr. Mark Fishman,
Mr. and Mrs. Steve Scalzo,, Mr. and Mrs.,Victor Scalzo, Robert Kucher, Kathryn
Kucher, Mark Rossi, Roge,.Hiddleston, Russ Schulke and others.
Mavor Lile called the meeting to order.
motion was made to Rprove 92 the minutes of the previous council meeting with
a correction to read that the li eguar is on duty at the road end of N. E.
47th Street Monday through Saturday from 1 - 5 P. M. The motion was seconded
and passed unanimously.
The Police Report for the month of June was reviewed by the Chief: of the Medina
Police Department.
Particular discussion took place on the "'Left turn only" and "Flo U Turn" signs in
the vicinity of 92nd Avenue N. E. and Points Drive.
Metro Transit Representative David. Browny Wio was zri Attend&hdle it the Council
meeting el in May reporting on the Metro bus routes, etc., has returned to
give a little more information on the planned changes on Route #220, to operate
in conjunction with the new freeway transfer station currently under construction
on Highway #520. That station is scheduled to be completed and buses operating
throu,gh there -on the freeway in September. The changes to #220 will not take
effect until February 3, 1979.
Discussion took place of plans among which are:
Extended service on the #220 into Yarrm-i Fbint
Buses to be taken off Overlake Drive in Medina
Extended #220 in downtown Bellevue to cross N. E. 4th St, to 112th St. down to
Main 5t. and loop it around by City Hall, Cverlake Hospital and.the Library so there
is direct service from this area to all those locations.
Will make direct transfer connections in downtown Bellevue either with the #226 or
#253 going into downtown Seattle, either with Highway #520 or I-90.
Hourly operation in one direction only
Use of a small van
Mr. Brown stated that the Service Evaluation Subcommittee of the Metro Council will
be meeting on July 27, 1978 and it was suggested that any suggestions or proposed
revisions by the Town or an individual be made a couple of days before that time.
Further discussion made comment that any bus coming along #520 that uses the freeway
will stop at the 92nd Avenue N. E. Flyer stop. #252 will not go through the flyer
stop,going to the University District, but it does stop at 84th Avenue N. E.
C
�}' P4y—.
Page 2
Council meeting 7/11/78
There was considerable discussion on the hourly operation in one direction only
of #220 and regarding the use of a small van for this route.
'fir. Brown stated that operating hours would probably be from 7 A. M. to 7 P. M.
but probably not on Sundays.
There was discussion of the number of riders required to justify keeping the
route open, which will depend on type and level of service. Councilman Freeman
stated it would not be appropriate to reduce transit costs and also reduce
.service, in -regard to the possibility of going to a suburban airporter-and using
an hourly operation in one direction only. If. 'Metro does go to a small bus then
he suggested increasing the service to more than an hour.
Whether Yarrow Point would be included in the designation of the bus, Mr. Brown
is not sure.
the .92nd Avenue N. E.
Discussion of location of/flyer stops on the freeway, particularly the one on
the north side of the freeway with 40 steps leading down to the stop which is
located quite a distance to the west. -
It was suggested that a flyer from Metro go out with our next Newsletter.
BARD' LOCATF0 OIN LOT 4 of Robert Kucher Plat.
Mayor Life reviewed the background.
When the Olympic Plat was platted, the barn was located on Lot 4 and became
non -conforming on the south and east sides because of said platting.
The: developers of the plat signed an agreement stating certain things
would be done before anything was done.to the barn.
There had been a caretaker living in the barn for a number of years
who still resides there
Mr. Joe ]Zhodes directed a letter to the Town stating his concern that
some work was going on in the barn and the result appeared to be a duplex
situation. The Town determined that no building permit had been obtained
and a stop work order was issuer..
On May 20th we received a letter from Mark Fishman expressing a great
deal of concern about the duplex situation and the non -conforming barn.
A follow up Letter on the 22nd of May 4sked. the Council for an answer.
On May 31st a letter was received from Steve Scalzo asking for the same
things but he listed three alternatives - the last of which was to remove
the barn completely.
On June 12th our Town Attorney, Mr. Dickinson, answered these letters with
a letter to Mr. Kucher stating what we felt to be the violation and what
might be the alternatives.
On June 23rd we received a letter from Mr. Ebel, representing Dr. Fishman,
suggesting that Dr. Fishman was quite concerned about the activity going
Y. .
Page 3
Council meeting 7/11/78
on in the barn and they wanted the matter resolved.
On the 27th of June we received a letter from Mr. Kueher stating what his
plans were for the barn.
The Town asked our Attorney to interpret our ordinances as they are written
plus interpret the Olympic Plat agreement as it was written. and to base his letter
of June 12th on his interpretation - which he did.
The interpretation generally'igas that our ordinance had been violated quite
extensively because of the fact that no building permit had been taken out
and because the barn was non conforming.
However,in our ordinance #225, reference is made to a primary residence on
a piece of property and, this is an interpretation, the barn is the primary
residence on Lot 4. Our ordinance says that a caretaker or housekeeper can
live in the primary residence. Mr. Kucher's daughter, Kathryn, lives on
the other side of the barn, or will live, or whatever the status will be,
in the remodeled area, once this thing is resolved on the other side --
however, and justifiably so perhaps, at the interpretation of. Mr. Scalzo,
Dr. Fishman. and Mr. Rhodes - besides being non conforming, all these violations
are being completely igxiored and they felt that the barn constituted a duplex.
In our ordinances we say duplexes will not be allowed in our Town. Unfortunately,
there is no definition in our ordinances as to what constitutes a duplex.
That can be interpreted in different ways and we must listen to all because
each has his rights.
Mr. Ebel, representing Dr. Fishman, spoke on the subject under discussion.
He stated that the preliminary opinion expressed by ?+fir. Dickinson was given
without any imput from them. He would like to Z§Oaftlmved
Council the benefit
of their thinking to state that this structure by either the
spirit or the letter of the zoning regulations.
Background -- The Fishmans are new residents. They moved here about a year
ago because Yarrow Point was a single family area. They lave on Lot 3 on
N. E. 39th Place. A diagram was drawn which located theArn•BanI t h iv that
there was two- Pots between the Kuchers and the Fishmans. is e lg�ag denly
appeared and as he understands it ,it was in defiance of a stop work order and
an application for a building permit, as he understands it, was denied,..afid
yet it: appeared: , What .is�'there is; a duplex,under any standard that he has
been able to find as far as he can tell with all. the facts that he has been
informed of that is occupied by two separate families. Neither of the
families living there is an owner of the particular property involved, There
are separate phones, separate kitchens..... which is the definition that the
City of Bellevue uses for a duplex. ...nccupied.-by two separate families which
are unrelated.
He stated that in terms of why Mr. Dickinson and he might differ as to what
the zoning code requires,it is important to understand and keep in mind that
the zoning code applies to each specific lot -- each lot is a separate entity and
the zoning requirements apply to each lot.
Page 4
Council meeting 7/11/78
Before the Olympic Plat was created, this was just one big piece of land.
As he understands it, it was NIT. Kucher who created this plat. What happened
is a piece of_ land was divided up'into separate lots, each of which have
a specific zoning requirement and Mr. Kucher sold three or four of these
lots off. 'rho -only argument under which this duplex structure could be
allowed is that Mr. Clark, who resided there before , is a caretaker. He
is a caretaker for Mr. Kucher. NIT. Kucher lives two lots down on the
waterfront. There is no caretaking, no lawn, on Lot #4 which is the lot
next to Dr. Fishman, across from Mr. Scalzo, where the duplex is located.
This is important. You as a council are required to follow up on what
the ordinances are. The ordinance says that you can have a caretaker reside
on your property. It is called a secondary use and a secondary use under
Section 5.2.2 of the code is something that is incidental to the use of the
primary residential building on the lot. That doesn't apply here because
this building is the primary residential building on the lot. It is not
incidential to the Kucher residence because it is two lots removed. When
he created two separate lots he created a problem which, under the
ordinance, is one that he has to live with.
In addition Section 7.3.5 of the code says that the caretaker, if you have one,
and to be a caretaker, must be principally employed on the property.
He is not. As Mr.Ebel understands it, Mr. Caark is the caretaker for
Mr. Kucher who lives two lots down. He is not principally employed on Lot #4
where this duplex is. We have a situation where the alleged basis for this
duplex, if it is incidental at all, is incidental to Lot 6, not Lot 4.
Mx. Clark is not principally employed on Lot 4. The only other possible
basis for an argument is that Mr. Kucher's daughter lives in one-half of
this residence. She is part of the family and her father owns the property
and, therefore, by some attribution, Mr. Clark is her caretaker. Your code
meets that situation because it defines family. She is not a member of the
Kucher family because a family under Section 5.8 of the code must be living
together in one dwelling unit and maintaining a common household. She is
not. She is independently employed and she has been living independently
of the family for some time and she is presently living two lots up...
independently. Unc?er all of these bases we think there is no basis under
the zoning code, absent of variance, to allow this kind of thing to proceed.
The code specifically tells you about the requirements of'A:.variance and one
is that you have to have a hardship situation that wasn't created by the
owner of the land and that would disqualify Mr. Kucher all by itself in this
particular situation so that we don't think it is permitted by the ordinance.
We wanted to bring that to your attention and are particularly concerned about
what happens in the future. Even if this is justified bysome kind of family
relationship, which we don't think it can be, which says how in the future
or how it will be occupied in the future. At the present time it is not
occupied, it is only half occupied by a member of the family and apparently
a non-member of the family also resides in the residence. If it were
allowed to continue, someone would be profiting by a wrong and the wrong
ought to be corrected by having the residents move.
p
Page 5
Council meeting 7/11/78
Mayor Life statedthat the Council recognizes that there are several violations
Is as it presently stands and are looking for constructive answers. additional
alternatives were mentioned such as primary residences and property lines and
he would like to know if these were altered -in any way, what would be the end
result. For instance, if Mr. Kucher 4iicorporated Lots -4, S., and b and made it
all one single-family residence, what would be the result:Perhaps there are
other alternatives
Mr. Scalzo was introduced and stated the alternatives mentioned in his letter were:
The barn should be returned to its prior state, including the removal
of all apartment improvements which were made without proper inspection
per the building codes, or
The barn be removed, or
The barn be made to conform to the Town zoning ordinances and building
conies, .including, but not limiter to, proper intended use, setback and
height restrictions, and electrical and plumbing requirements.
This does not settle the issue of a multi -family dwelling residence.
The point he would like to make, independent of the definition of a duplex,
is that a single-family dwelling area is what we all moved into Yarrow
Point for, pay taxes for, and we all relied on it. In looking at the
situation on Lot 4, it is obvious that there is more than one family there -
Ms.Kucher and Mr. Clark. There are also other people xesidin� in _the.barn:T.
With new people come additional cars, additional dogs. He stated he thinks
it should be understood that there is probably more tb-the immediate
situation than meets the eye - parking, dogs, etc. additional people Living
in the facilities that make it more than a duplex or two family residence -
probably three families.... These are•his concerns.
Mr. Rossi representinE Mr. Kucher, was introduced and stated that he has not
had the opportunity to review the zoning codes of the Town. However, he did have
an opportunity to review them cursorily prior to the meeting and also the
Town's file of correspondence that has transpired on the subject.
It is nice, he stated, to refer to this as a duplex which has been referred
to as a duplex extensively by Mr. Ebel. However, this barn has been on the
premises for quite sometime and still retains the characteristics of a barn,
at least aesthetically. Referring to it as a duplex is more of an emotional
term rather than a definitive term. Evidently this problem really arose as
the.result of the failure to apply for a building permit. The record is
clear that no building permit was ever applied for and we are attempting to
rectify the problem, as indicated in Mr. Kucher's latest correspondence to
the Town. Mr. Rossi stated that he would like to make that clear, as he
understands it, that a building permit was not applied for and has not been
denied. As far as the zoning code requirements are concerned, he is familiar
with the specific section that Mr. .Dickinson referred to in his letter and
the section t7Yat ....his. rec&mn6ndation was based on and that is xhat
I*
Page 6
Council meeting of 7/11/78
it is possible under the current zoning requirements to provide for a
structure for a .full --time caretaker. He stated that he thinks that (1)
if one would realisticly look at the situation of Mr. Clark, they would
find that his caretaking duties do not stop on 4 and 5 and all of a
sudden appear on 6. These properties are contiguous of property
and the work that Mr. Clark is performing is contiguousyto all and made
upon all of the lots. He stated he thinks that we have to look at Lots
4, 5, and. 6 as more or less one lot. All three are owned by Mr. Kucher.
They are treated as if they are one lot right now. He understands that
there isn't anything else on there but the main house and the barn.
Referring to primary and secondary uses, based upon past experience, he
stated that he thinks it is reasonable to say that when sections are
}gifted out of context as they apparently were in this instance, false
impressions can be gained and assumes that Mr. Dickinson has considered
the zoning code in its entir-6ty. Mr. Kucher's intention is not:•to ,.create
any problems within the community. "fir. Rossi understands that this is a
small -close-knit community and it is his intention to Keep it that way.
However, Mr. Rossi thinks that when you analyze zoning codes and restrictions
that are placed an property, both legally and practically, that they have
to be very strictly construed in favor of the person who is attempting to
utilize the property within reason and to the best of his ability. Reference
was made to Mr. Kucher's latest correspondence stating what he feels will be
a resolution of the problem satisfactory to the concerns of the convaunity
and at the same time accomplishing what he desires. His daughter will be
living there. A full-tiihe caretaker will be living there. That fits squarely
within the zoning classfications. It is unfair to classify it as a duplex
unit, as some type of a rental unit bringing in dogs, cats, or third
families, or whatever. We have to take a realistic approach as to what
the situation is and work constructively.
Steve Scalzo additional comments; ;::..'.'::. ;:. ; :.:...'. in addition to a third party
living in the am t.exe are more dogs living there than are allowed.
fie pointed out that a citation has been issued concerning a dog -from
that property that had caused damage to his property. This points out
that a third individual living &n the'barn_,cany-cause these kinds of
things. It's not the fact that it is a barn, for a house could be
built and cause this type of a situation, but it's the fact that the
work was done just recently on the barn, which results in these problems.
Ever since the barn has been converted there has been more than two
families living there.
Mayor Lile stated he would like to see the residents'_invblved and-y%he Town Let
together with their attorneys antic iron this problem out. The Town is
prepared to protect its'pos tion:the full<;.§apoort although .the
Plannihkg Commissioai dl's�:grees wi,t}i ghat•.-.is,:moraily:)going-.ari.but they�,ha,re
sai&.also they have interpreted the position the Town has taken to be accurate.
This will be initiated through Ron Dickinson that the three attorneys will
get together with perhaps -himself -or one of the council so that the problem
can be resolved to everyones satisfaction through compromise but there is not
going to be a complete winner nor hopefully will there be a complete loser
but everyone is going to be reasonable. Ile are all very concerned. He
thanked everyone very much.
F . C .
Page 7
Council meeting of 7/11/78
Engineering fees _ Points Drive project.
and from Brack Adams
The Town is in receipt of a letter from Senator Magnuson/in.reply to our
complaint about the billings on Points Drive. It is the Mayor's intention
to respond to this letter after review with Allen Newbill. Dr. Freeman
stated that we specifically asked that certain questions be answered .which
were not nor were the explanations realistic... that this is not acceptable
and that we expect a reach more acceptable reply.
Health Department Agreement
Mayor Lile referred to alternatives presented by a committee of the
Suburban Mayor's Association in regard to distribution of costs for 1979
health services. It was recommended that an "alternative D" be accepted
and it is Mayor Tile's recommendation that we not accept that alternative
because the formula is based on an. --assessed valuation/population basis, which we
[tints Point has advised that their Town has agreed to -the alternative believe to
presented. This matter will be pursued with the health department. be inequit-
able
Morningside Park - Rover Hiddleston
to be accomplished with
Mf.',;Hiddle5on" teviewed the plans .that-vwdre. /Y the anticipated funds from
the Federal Zovernment - which funds are no longer available. The
plans consisted of a small development of a playfield in the park. to clear
a portion of it, but in some grass and turn it into a useful area. If we
are going to do this we are either going to have to do it with no money,
or very little money, or not do it at all. He stated that if we are not
going to do anything with this Park we may as well sell it or sell one-half
of it and use the funds to do something because right now it is absolutely
worthless for any community purpose whatsoever.
There has been a lot of effort put in to it to put in trails, which nobody
uses. I*iat he is advocating does not require federal government participation
or have to collect a lot of money to do it. To do anything is.bettet than
what we are doing which is doing nothing. We have already mdde ..a commitment
and had the hearings.t o clear it. It is suggested that we go through the
Park Board and see if we can fell the trees that are necessary. One source
of income is what we used to have in the Park Fund, the second source is
that there is some good fire wood that could be sold and even if there is no
money and just volunteers taking the trees down, we would not be clear cutting
right to the road but;'do'that only so that you could see through the trees
down into the park area.
Mr. Hiddleston doesn't feel it is important to have a long term construction
plan but just start and do it and start clearing. Another point, if money
was somehow obtained, clearing that land is not removing any of the alternatives
we have with the exception of making it into a permanent green belt which it
wasn't intended to be in the first place. By chopping the trees down we have
not done anything wrong. See if we can coordinate an effort of volunteers
to go in and clear that place out but knocking down all the trees that would
need to come down for a playfield.
Mayor Lile stated he felt Mr. Hiddleston's suggestions were long over due
Page 8
Council meeting of 7/11/78
because when the Federal funds were lost, the Town lost.sight of our plans.
fie complicated Mr. Hiddleston for coming with this constructive. suggestion.
If the Council agrees, we should plan to proceed. Funds that might be
available for the park, should be investigated at budget time.
Further discussion.
Mayor Lile would recommend to the Park Roard that they become active. Also,
he recommended that Mr. Hiddleston make his presentation to them.
Carson iCeeler stated that before we start cutting trees, physical marks should
be made as to what will be saved so.that we don't destroy what cannot be renewed.
It is a good idea, this plan Mr. Hiddleston has presented, and we should make
something useful of that main portion of the park but we should do it with some
reasonable planning and control.
Mr. Hecklund asked how far we could go without getting an Environmental Impact
Statement.
Mr. Newbill stated that he feels that it must have a check list ... a negative
declaration that declares there is a non --significant impact. He is not sure
of whether a hearing is needed, even for cutting down trees.
Mr. Hiddleston suggested that we sell the property and buy up some lots with
the money.
Mrs. Diede stated at the time the application was made to the Interagency Committee
for funding of additional land for Morningside Park, the Interagency Committee made
it very clear that the land would never be sold and only used for park purposes.
Mr. Newbill suggested that possibly a portion of the land at the south end, say 401,
could be sold to adjoin -a, -narrow strip-�of practically.unusable private land, for,
say $50,000. Mayor Lile stated that we would look into this matter with the State,
and work with Roger on his suggestions with what we can determine could be done.
It is anticipated we would have residents donate their services.
Dr. Freeman stated that if the Council. and Park Board agree with a development
of a playfield, that we should have a plan -and commit ourselves to a package.
Further discussion.
Roger Iiiddleson feels we should go ahead to do what we can now, even though it is
not the ultimate. This would mean getting together with the Hoard before the next
council meeting and come back to the Council and check re funds, if any, and discuss
with them.
Mr. Hiddleston is not advocating not doing it right when we have the funds or the ways
to do it but what he is advocating strongly is making a start.
The matter of selling part of the park land will be pursued with the State and the
results of this information will be passed on to yr. Hiddleston and the Park Board
as soon as obtained for further review with the Council..
Page 9
Council meeting of 7111/78
Engineer's Report
"708"£undsfrom EPA - Metro Drainage Planning Study
Qne million dollars has become available in the State of Washington
for storm drainage management plans. Mr. Jeff an has written
regarding this matter and is aware that the three of Medina,
Clyde dill and Yarrow Point have indicated that they might like to
jointly address surface water management problems in our area.
It was felt that the four towns might have an opportunity to
receive some of this money.
Mr. Newbill stated that he has coordinated with the four towns
and all feel that this type of study would be a good thing to do.
The obligations that the Town would be taking (would be 100$ funding)
that we would have to coordinate through Metro who would take no
money out of the money for admistration.. Whatever estimate is
submitted at this time we have to live with.
A letter has been prepared by Mr. Newbill in response to this
information briefly outlining what is to be done. He read these to
the Mayor and Council., who agreed this matter should be pursued.
Jeff Bauman has given considerable encouragement that th6se;:plans presented herein
will be well accepted because it is very much in line with what
the Department of Ecology has in mind.
Six -Year Street Plan - 1979 - 1984
Proposed Ordinance #226 amending the six -year street plan was presented by
our Town Engineer.
There are three projects listed - 95th south of 40th
38th 92nd to 94th
32nd west of 92nd
Discussion.
This meeting has been advertised as a public hearing on the above -mentioned
six -year street construction pro.'gram.
After discussion, Dr. Freeman made a motion that Ordinance #226 adopting a
six -year street construction program for the years 1979 through 1984, amending
Ordinance #217, be approved, as recommended by our Town Engineer.
The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Bond Issue - for election November 1978 - after discussion it was determined
this matter is to be reviewed by the Committee Robert Becklund and Jeanne Whiting
►' and presented to the Council at the next council meeting. Mr. Newbill wad
requested to update the figures so they can better make their recommendations.
Page 10
Council meeting of 7/11/78
other business
information
George Mead brought to the Council's attention /that the asphalt sidewalk
ea ing south of the overpass does not reach N. E. 32nd St. ....about a
30 foot length.
Jeanne Whiting inquired of Mr. Newbill where the water fWLin is on N. E. 32nd
t, Sheas been informed by a resident that each property is serve y
individual lines. King County Water District #68 (Bellevue Utilities Dept.)
serves that area. This residents has called the Town office gTlt,�e was infis F n6ed
Street Maintenance - Mayor Lile stated he is anxious to complete what
patching work is to be done :-Mrs. Diede asked if the Council and the Engineer
would approve of the street Department of Medina accomplishing this work
if they will. It agreed by our Engineer that the work necessary could
be satisfactarilylthem.
Southeast corner of Points Drive and. 92nd - area to be patched. Determined
it is State zg way property. r. Newbill to contact them for repair.
Juanita Loder inquired, during a discussion Of the traffic revision on Points
Drive, what the cost has been to date. It is estimatel tat the costs to
date are approximately $1,000.
bus
Mrs. Loder inquired about Metro's/transportation to Renton, Discussion.
This is a point she would like to understand rom Metro...and she will
pursue this further.
Mayor Lile stated that Ed Watton, Ma or of ?Idina, had been elected to the
Metro Council.
A letter has been received from the Attorneys for the City of Kirkland in
regard to Shorelines of lake Washington. Discussion. This emitter will
be reviewed and a response will be made.
N. F. 47th Street Road end.
Discussion took place in regard to accomplishing whatever might be -of help
in making this area a more pleasant place for the residents who reside on
each side. Discussion of making it a Local Acess Street. It was determined
that the Police Department shall be requested to present documented reports
Street Summer crew on calls and patrols.
Mrs. Diede reported that a mower has been purchased as well as a large weed
eater which eliminates the need for going and coming.each day to rent these
machines. The boys are being supervised by Mrs. Diede almost every day and they
seem to be doing a good job and are good workers, Jim Sternberg has been
hired to drive the Diede's truck when necessary. He is capable and of an age
required to handle it.
Clerk/Treasurer's Report - The financial r ort of the Town.was presented as of this date.
Vouchers as tollows were approved for payment: Current Fxpense #2259 - 2282
Street #939 - 950• Mrs. Diede pointed out that the amount of expenses paid out
tonight,because of the large payments to Police Fire Libra a very 1
The meeting was adjourned at 12:30 P. M.
rra� i��e lerk reas���i
TOWN OF YARROW POINT VOUCHERS JULY 11, 1978
Current Expense
#2259 - Lorraine M. Diede - Services for July $1,185. less W/T 275.
S/S 71.69
Ret 71.10
17.79
plus $20.92 over charges for MA and IT 788.13
2260 - Christian Diede - July office rent 125.0Q
2261 - Public Employees Retirement System - July L.M. Diede $71.10
Tom 14.00
67.19 152.29
2262 - Wash. Physician's Service - iC. W. Day insurance July 60.40
2262 - URS Company - Statements 6/14 - 14883 - Retainer May 65.00
7/6 15064 - " June 65.00
6/14 - 14884 - Misc. 89.13
6/14 - 14886 - B.P.3/25-4/28 472.68
7/6 - 15065 - B.P4/29-5/26 249.74 941.55
2264 - City of Bellevue - 1st % of 1978 Fire Protection Contract - 10,768.50
1st of 1978 Library maintenance + 209.50
10,978.00 .
2265 - City of Medina - 2nd Qtr. Police Protection Contract 1978 C. E.5,721.75
FRS 1,007.
AR 193.
6,921.75
2266 - Bellevue District Court - 11 cases @ $4.00 - June 44.00
2267 - Void
2268 - Seattle First National Bank - Bellevue - 1st Deposit 3rd QTR.
LMD Fed. Income Tax 275.00
2269 - City of Medina - Statement 6/15/78it - Officers in Court 20.80
2270 - M. McEwan - 18 hours @$4.00 = $72.00 - office assistance while
LMD attending AWC Conv. less S/S 4.36.
MA & IT .28 4.64 67.36
room
2271 - Holiday Inn - Bal. due on accommodations LMD AWC Conv. June 16,17,18 28.29
2272 - Book Publishing - Refund of deposit paid Holiday Inn for Town of
Yarrow Point in error 20.00
2273 - Lorraine M. Diede - Registration and events - AWC Conv. 62.00
12274 Lorraine M. Diede - Reimbursement for monies expended 19.06
see details attached to voucher
2275 - Pacific N. W. Bell - Office Telephone 6/8 Reg. 33.40 Service
3.27 L. D. 36.67
2276 - K. C. Library System - 1st Payment 1978 Library Service 3,177.02
Page 2- Vouchers 7/11/78
2277 - Don Emanuels - 1teimbursement for nylon rope purchased at discount
for road end N. E. 47th St. 56.91
2278 - Carol Emanuels - 88 hours @$3.50 Lifeguard 6/16 - 7/7 = 8308.00
less S/S 18,63
M. A. 11 6.10
4I - - 24,73 283.27
2279 - Stuart A. Magoon - 6/19-28 - N. E- 47th St. Road end and other
park area labor - 81-, hrs. @$3.00 - $25.50
less S/S 1.54
MA F71I .59.
TT-3 2.13 23.37
2280 - Jim Sternberg - Park Labor - 3 hours @83.00 = $9.00
6/29-7/1 less S/S .54
MA F II.,.21 .75 = 8.25
2281 - Malcolm Reid _ 6/19 - 7/7 - 31 hrs. @ 83.00 = $93.00 Park Labor
less S/S 5.63
MA & iI 2. 21
7.84 = 85.16
2282 - Red Devil Fireworks Co. - Y. P.'s share of 4th of .July
fireworks display 750.00
Street
939 - URS Company - Statement 6/14 - 14884 - Pt's Dr. Traffic Revision 270.14
7/6 - 1S066 172.72
6/14 - 14885 - 42nd St. road end 7.67 450.S3
940 - Ernst Malmo - Pay and Save - Invoices as attached to voucher
Materials for streets 34.50
941 - Bellevue Rentals - Rental of Roof Mower and Green machine as per
attached invoices to voucher 104.3S
942 - City of Medina - Statement for Labor streets 2/14 - 6/8/78 90.13
943 - Minor Void
944 - Puget Power - Street lights - 5/.2 - 6/30 141.46
.9.45 - Georgetown Hdwe -(Need Eater) Green Machine 273.62
946 - Polson Hdwe - Roof mower 327.42
947 - Tum a Lum Lumber Co. - posts for street signs 37.94
948 - Stuart A. Magoon - 6/19 - 23 - Street Labor 8 hrs @$3.00= $24.00 less
S/S 1.45 and MA & 11 .56 = $ 2. 01 21.99
949 - Malcolm Reid - 6/19 - 7/7 - 42.5 Street Labor hrs $3.00 - 127.50 less
S/S 7.71,MA F II 2,95 = 10.66 116.84
Page 3 .- Vouchers 7/11/78
950 - Jim Sternberg - 6/29 - 7/10 - Street Labor - 14 hours @ $3.00 = 42.00
less S/S 2.54 and MA & 11 1.48 W 4.02
7.98
plus dump fees paid by Jim 3.78
0
41.76
TOWN OF YARROW M 11W
A, TREASURER REPORT '7�11/78
Cash Balance 6/9/78 $ll,us .52
Investments 6/9/78 33,083.71 $44,709.23
Receipts 6/9 - 7/11/78
Total 7/11/78
Less Disbursements
Warrants Paid 6/23 and 7/10
State Treasurer June
Balance 7/11/78
$3,656.75
198.00
18,394.95
Fund Cash Book Balances Investments
Current Expense $17,698.18 $ 3,095.02
Street 5,503.22 5,650.03
Arterial Street 1,764.32 247330.73
Federal Rev. Sharing 1,007.00 5.87
Anti. Recession 193.00 2.06
$26,165.72 $33,083.71
Outstanding Debts and obligations
current ense Street
Warrants 6/9/78 $881.47 $N7T2
Warrants 7/11/78 $24,360.28 1,642.44
$25,241.75 $1,937.56
Balance/toA49eF. Austin Statement For Legal Fees
N. E. 36th
Sideline Boundaries
$63,104.18
3,854.75
$59,249.43
Totals
$20,793.20
11,153.25
26,095.05
1,012.87
$59,249.43
Total
$1,176.59
$26,002.72
$27,179.31
2,543.35
1,397.23
Lorraine M. Diede, Clerk/Treasurer.
8/28/78
TO: MAYOR XND CO(JNCIL
0 CLERK/
FROM: LORRATNE DIEDE, TREASURER
SUBJECT: BUDGET REPORT THROUGH 0/30M
ATTACHED IS THE CLERIC'S BUDGET REPORT THRO?!Gli JUNE 30, 1978
THE REPORT THROUGH SEP'CE MER 30, 1978 SHOULD BE READY FOR TFiF OCTOBER COUNCIL
MEETING AT lgiICFI TME I WOUL`) LIEF TO DISCUSS THE TOWN FINANCIAL STATUS IN
MORE DETAIL.
WE ARE ANTICIPATING THE PRTPARATTON OF A PREUMINARY BUDGET FOR. 1.979 AT T!-lIS
TINlE AND WILL BE FORWARDING THAT INFORMATION' FOR DISCUSSION AT TIIEi OCTOBER
MEETING ALSO.
19
0
TOWN of YARROW POT7
CLERK'S BiP]GF'r REPORT JI�`F. 39, 1978
C[.1RRF'dT EXPHNSE FIT LM #001
AiJDGET
RFVEVJE
BALANCE OF
RECEIVE]
BMG1 T-_
30I:.00
Fluid Balance 12/31/77
$�, 0
4)111.
81)
311.10'
Property Taxes
48,715.00
24,643.79
24;071.21
313.00
Sales Tax
2.9000.00
-0-
2,000.00
31.6.00
Business and Occupation Tax
16,500.00
5,912.95
10,587.05
332.10
Building Permits
41*200.00
2,780.00
1,420.00
335.60
Motor Vehicle Ex. Tx
8,349.00
5,083.76
3,265.24
335.70
Liquor. Ex. Tx
3,025.00
1,721.70
1,303.30
335.80
Liquor Board Profits
8,659.00
2,090.65
6,568.35
335.91
Travel Trailer Tx
-0-
102.36
102.36
341.30
Sub Division frees
100.00.
-0-
100.00
341.30
Board of Adjustment fees
200.00
120.00
80.00
351.00
Fines
2,000.00
771.40
1,228.60
361.10
Interest Earnings
400.00
-0-
400.00
369.30
Transfer from Park Fund
704.00
704.05
.05
369.30
Transfer from L. I. -. #1. Fund
-0-
1.24
1..24
389.90.
"disc. 'don Revenue - fkmts Point
400.00
145.60
254.40
389.90
Mik. Non Revenue - Driver Ed .fees,
:- 1 ,000.00
357.00
643.00
$100,552.00 $48,746.28 M ,805.72
Wage 2 - Clerk's Budget Report Jane 30, 1978
0
,10
511.60
512.00
513.10
514.1.0.11
514.10.13
514.10.21
514.10.32
514.10.34
514.10.35
514.10.36
514.10.37
514.10.38
514.10.39
514.23.11
514.23.13
514.23..31
51.4.23.51
515.20.31
519.
�521.20.51
521..20.51,
521. 20.36
521.20.42
`521.20.42
522.20
532.20.10
532.20.31
533.20.11
533.20.13
533:60.50
534.,50
535.30.51
562.00.51
562. 00. 51.
572.00.51
572.00.51
57.3.90
C1 RRENT F'CPENSE FUND #001
F x P FNTDITf 1RE s
Legislative
Judicial
Executive
Office .Assistance
,t
Personal Ben
Office Supplies
Communication
Advertising
Printing
Insurance and Bands
Public Utilities
Repairs and Maintenance
Rent
Clerk/Treasurer
Tt -itPersonal Ben.
BUDGET
WFImED
THRU
6/30/78
100.00
0-
-n-
-n-
100.00
900.00
-o-
'100.00
-n-
400.n0
123.88
1,000.00
575.80
250.00
53.23
350.00
1.71. 75
2,000.00
1,183.00
250.00
86.47
.600.nn
678.14
1,500.00
750.00
14,100.00
7,073.22
2,270.00
1,024.99
State Audit
500.00
-0-
Election Costs
450.00
-0:.
Legal
7,800.00
3=,•000.00
Other Gen, Gov't. Services
3,700.00
410.71
Medina Police Land Services**
-22,519.00
5,689.75
K. C. Police Water Services
590.00
590.00
K. W. Day Ins. Premium
730.00
362.40
Driver Education
700.00
-0- ***
Court Costs
300.00
208.20
Fire Protection
20,1.75.00****
6,725.00
Engineer - Retainer
780.01 ►
325.00
Engineer - Professional Services
4,000.00
1,695.92
Park F Recreation - Lifeguard Sal. 1,050.00
-0-
" Per.Ben. 130.00
9.30
to Facilities
4,630.00
--0-
Garbage QUmpsters)
-0-
157.50
Air Pollution
186.00
186.00
Sea. K. C. Health Services Contract 30n.00
75.00
K. C. Alcoholism Services
K. C. Library Services
Library - .Bellevue: Maintenance
Community Events
*Paid by Treasurer's check
** See adder. . costs under FRS & AR Funds
***Paid by Treasurer's check
****Amount increased. to $21,537.00
***** Amount decreased to 8419.00
300.00 119.43
62354.00 -0-
688.00***** -0-
750.00 -0-
100,552.0 ,$31, 74.69
BALANCF. OF BUDGBT
100.00
-0-
100.00
900.00
100.00
276.12
424.20
196.77
178.25
817.00
163.53
75 .00
7,026.78
1,245.01
500.00
450.00,
4,800.00
3,289.2�
16,829.25
-0-
367.60
700.00
91.80
13,450.00
455.00
2,304.08
1,050.00
120.70
4.631,00
57
-0-
225.00
180.57
6,354.00
.688.00
750.00
69,277.31
e
G
Page 3 - Clerk's Budget Report June 30, 1978
FIDERaL REVENUE Si-iARING FUND, _# 10 3
Revenue
BUDGET
THROUGH
6/30/78
301.00
Fund Balance 12/31/77
6.00
5.87
332.99
Federal Revenue Funds
$4,050.00
$2,014.00
361.10
Interest Earnings
50.00
. -0-
$4,106.00
$2,019.87
Expenditures
521.20
Medina.Police - Land
$4,106.00
$1,007.00
ANTI RECESSION RNA '#106
Revenue
301.00
Fund Balance 12/31/77
2.00
2.06
332.98
Anti Recession Fluids
S1,050.00
418.00
361.10
Interest Earnings
10.00
-0-
$1,062.00
$420.06
Expenditures
521.20
Medina Police - Land
$1,062.00
$225.00
BALANCE OF BUDGET
.13
$2,036.00
50.00
$2,086.13
$3,099.00
6
632.00
10.00
$641.94
$837.00
9
0
Page 4 - Clerk's Budget Report June 30, 1978
STREET FUND #107
REVENUE
1978
BUDGETED
301.00 Fund Balance 12/31/77 $ 8,265.00
335.50 Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax 9,036.00
361.10 Interest Earnings 250.00
17,SS1.00
EXPENDITURES
TT TlllT' �T1
541.00
Road Construction
542.00
Road Maintenance
542.63
Street Lighting
542.64
Traffic Control
542.67.38
Street Cleaning
Reed through
6/30/78
$ 8,266.58
4,031.60
_o_
$ 12,298.18
BAL. OF BUDGET
1 58
5,004.40
250.00
$5,252.82
Expended through
6/30/78 BAL. OF BUDGET
$ 10,751.00
-0-
$10,751.00
5,000.00
88.79
4,911.21
900.00
366.37
433.63
500.00
695.24
195.2�
500.00
295.12
204.88
$ 17,551.00 $ 1,445.52
$16,105.48
Page 5 - Clerk/s Budget Report June 30, 1978
I *
301.00
335.40
335.50
361.10
541.00
542.00
ARTERIAL. STREET FUKD # 10 2
REVENUE
BUDGET
1978
Fund Balance 12/31/77 $26,350.00
Motor Vehicle .Fuel Tax 5,719.00
Forward Thrust 9,301.00
For street lighting with
streets that have under-
ground wiring
Rev. Rec'd
thru 6/30/78
$26,482.89
2,545.82
-0-
Interest Earnings 111500.00 336.69
$42,870.00 $29,365.40
EXPEA'DITURES
Bal. of Budget
� 132.89
3,173.15
9,301.00
1,163.31
$13,504.60
BUDGET
Expended thru
1978
6/30/78
Bat. of Budget
Road Construction $22,870.00
32270.35
$19,599.65
Road Maintenance 20,000.00
-0-
20,000.00
$42,870.00
$3,270.35
$39,599.65
* Should he $8,540.00
HOUSING AND C0M40NITY DEVELOPMENT I'[JNi] #105
REVENUE
333.00 Federal. Grants $15,000.00 -0- $15,000.00
EXPENDITURES
533.50.63 Park Improvement $IS,000.00 -0- $15,00D.00
40