Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutResolution 85-2365RESOLUTION NO. 85 -2365 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR 1985. WHEREAS, the California State Legislature passed legislation during the 1984 session requiring the filing of an annual Statement of Investment Policy by local public agencies; and WHEREAS., the Governor of the State of California signed such legislation into law effective January 1, 1985 (Chapter 1226); and WHEREAS, the City Treasurer of the City of Temple City de- clares the annual Statement of Investment Policy to be as follows: PURPOSE: This statement is intended to provide a guideline for the prudent investment of temporary idle cash, trust funds and restricted monies and to outline a policy for maximizing the efficiency of the cash management system. Ultimate investment goals include the enhancement of economic status and the protection of pooled cash investments. OBJECTIVE: The cash management system of the City of Temple City is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues, thus insur- ing the investment of monies to the fullest extent possible. Attempts to obtain highest interest yields possible are a statement of fact as long as investments meet the criteria required for safety and liquidity. POLICY: The City of Temple City operates its pooled ale cash investments under the Prudent Man Rule (Civil Code §2261). This affords abroad spectrum of investment opportunities so long as the invest- ment is deemed prudent and is permissable under currently effective legislation of the State of California and other imposed legal restrictions. The City of Temple City strives to maintain the level of investment of idle funds as near to 100% as possible. Consistent with this factor, invest- ments are made under the terms and conditions of Sections 53600 -53683 of the Government Code of California. Criteria for selecting investments and the absolute order of priority are: 1. Safety 2. Liquidity 3. Yield Government securities and debt obligations by Gov- ernmental agencies whose obligations carry the full faith and credit of the Federal Government, and re- purchase agreements of the same stature, are the highest quality investments available in the terms of safety and liquidity. Certificates of deposit, savings accounts and interest - bearing active deposits are insured or collateralized to the degree consistent with or exceeding existing law or regulation. Most investments are highly liquid, with the excep- tion of collateralized or insured term certificates of deposit issued by banks and savings and loans. Certificate maturities are selected to anticipate cash needs, thereby obviating the need for forced liquidation and the accompanying loss of interest payment. RESOLUTION NO. 85 -2365, Page 2 The City of Temple City operates its investment pro- gram with many Federal, State and self- imposed con- straints. It does not buy stocks; it does not specu- late; it does not deal in futures, options or security loan agreements. Investments are generally limited to maturities of one year or less. To maximize investment income, the City of Temple City uses all available, economically feasible investment aids. Economic conditions and various money markets are monitored in order to assess the probable course of interest rates. The final basic premise underlying the City of Temple City investment philosophy is to insure the safety of principal and to provide money when needed. A high dollar yield on investments, though important, ranks third in the priority of investment strategy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Temple City claims that an annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Temple City has been filed by the City Treasurer for the calendar year 1985 in compliance with Section 53646 (A) of the Government Code of the State of California. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1985. ATTEST: Chief De uty City MAYOR I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 85 -2365 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 18th day of June, 1985, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen- Atkins, Gillanders, Swain, Tyrell, Dennis NOES: Councilmen -None ABSENT: Councilmen- None Chief D uty City % erk