HomeMy Public PortalAbout86-017 (02-18-86)RESOLUTION N0. 86-17
A RF.SOLUI'ION OF TILE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OP LYNWOOD PERTAINING TO VAZ f, LANE, INC. dba
LITTLE ANNIE WANNIE'S APPEAL
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on
January 21, 1986, at which certain evidence was made available
to tiie Ciiy Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully considered
said evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved as follows:
On January 21, 1986 the Lynwood City Council heard an
appeal from Vaz F, Lane, Inc. The appeal was from the C.i.ty's
protest against any issuance o:[ a liquor license for the premises
located at 5162 Fast Imperial Highway in the City of Lynwood.
IIaving considered all the evidence, the City Council hereby
makes the fol.lotaing findings:
1. From about October 1965 to June 1983, Vaz ~ Lane,
Inc. operated a business known as Little Annie I9annie's at
5162 East Imperial IIi.ghway, in the City of Lynwood.
2. On August 30, 1983, the liquor license for the
business was revoked for one year.
3. Vaz F, Lane, Inc. has not done any business on the
premises since approximately June, 1983.
4. After the suspension was over, Vaz ~, Lane, Inc.
applied with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for
a liquor license for the premises.
S. The Department o:f Alcoholic Beverage L'ontrol has
not yet acted on Vaz ~ Lane's application.
6. The consumption of alcoholic beverages on the
premises is prohibited by the currently applicable zoning.
7. On October 1, 1984 the City sent a protest letter
to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
Based on the above findings, the City Council reaches
the following conclusions:
1. Vaz $ Lane is not entitled to a liquor license,
pursuant to Business and Professions Code Sect.i.on 23790, because
the premises are located i.n a territory where the exercise of
the rights and privileges conferred. by the license would be
contrary to a valid zoning ordinance of the City of i,ynwood.
2. Vaz ~, Lane has no rights based. on its prior use
because, contrary to Business and Professions Code Section 23790
~°^ (b), the licensed premises have not been operated continuously
since the ef:Eective date of the zoning ordinance without sub-
, stantial change in mode or character of operation.
3. Vaz ~, Lane's appeal of the City's protest letter
is denied, and the City Council affirms the Ci.ty's position as
taken i.n the October 1, 1984 letter.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of
February 1986.
ROBERT HENNING~ Ma or
City of Lynwood
Al"PEST:
ANDREA L. HOOPER, City e-r-~
City of Lynwood
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
C.. ~LL~L2, /sow.
City Attor y
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
~~~1
CENTS MAS, Director o
Community Development
I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Lynwood
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted by the City Council of. the City of Lynwood at its regular
meeting of 18th day of February 1986.
AYES: COUNCILPERSON BYORK, MORRIS, THOMPSON, WELLS, HENNING
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE ~
!~~ i
City Clerk, City of Lyn ood