Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout19961030 - Agendas Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 96-22 Regional Open Space MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Meeting 96-22 WORKSHOP ' SPECIAL MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 p.m. 330 Distel Circle Wednesday Los Altos, CA October 30, 1996 (7:00) ROLL CALL PUBLIC WORKSHOP FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A REGIONAL OPEN SPACE PLAN: (7:05) 1. Review Background and Objectives of Regional Open Space Plan Project (7:15) 2. Review of Proposed Mission Statement (7:45) 3. Review of Proposed Revisions in Basic Policy of the Mid neninsula Regional n Space District (8:45) 4. Determine/Confirm Next Steps (9:00) ADJOURNMENT Members of the public will have the opportunity to address the Board concerning the development of the Regional Open Space Plan. Refreshments will be provided. 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022-1404 . Phone:415-691-1200 . FAX:415-691-0485 E-mail:mrosd@netcom.com Board ofDlrectors:Pete Siemens,Mary C.Davey, Teena Henshaw,David T.Smernoff,Nonette Hanko,Betsy Crowder,Wim de Wit General Manager:L.Craig Britton Distributed at October 30 , 1996 Special Meeting by B. Crowder F O R U M Dispellino the Myth Many believe the Park Service must balance two incompatible missions: to protect resources and to provide public access. BY ROBIN WINKS OR YFARS, advocates for and em- in such manner and by such means as lators who served on the committees. ployees of the National Park Service will leave them unimpaired for the en- and thus one must obtain access m and have complained that Congress,and joyment of future generations. examine the private papers of' those through Congress the American Though the mandate contains no committee members. people, created a contradictory reference to recreation, those who The act refers to enjoyment by fu- mandate for the national parks. The favor large-scale access to the national ture generations,which arguably intro- contradiction comes, they claim, from parks and who wish to promote out- duces an expectation of'changing defi- requiring the Park Service to balance door recreational agendas invariably nitions of enjoyment by reference to two incompatible missions: to preserve argue that the second charge in some the future. At no point is enjoyment the resources placed in its charge equated with recreation, and it is and to provide public access—and clearly circumscribed by "unim- by extension, opportunities for out- \ 1 ' paired." The private papers of the door recreation—throughout the - members of the Committee on National Park System. Public Lands and of other relevant Almost always, friends and critics committees make it clear that the of the Park Service point to the Or- i two goals to which the act of 1916 ganic Act of 1916 as the source of I NATIONAL PARK ! ° refers were listed in order of im- MAtJDAlr the contradictory mandate.This ar CONSERVE NAvEPicNicS; portance. Further, the prevailing II LAND & uFF C rules of rhetorical style, at which gument is false on three grounds. The act of 19 16 did not provide for 1 several members of the committees two opposing goals; it is not the I ( �r ��� ; 1 G' were past masters, called for listing only legislation by which the goals W f- _ _ desirable goals in a descending of the Park Service were defined; j order of significance unless there and it did not refer to public out- were many goals, in which case the door recreation as a goal of the Na- most important would be placed tional Park System. ""+ �J first and the second most important The Organic Act established the �� % c might be used in conclusion. I °r The first substantive discussion nation's first professional park ser- �_ Y tl" vice to promote and regulate the use of the purposes of a National Park of federal areas known as "national A.I.TOOs Service took place in the House of parks, monuments, and reservations" manner overrides the first. To test Representatives during hearings in The service was to conserve the scenery whether this was the intent of Con- April 1912. Representatives discussed and the natural and historic objects and gress, in the act of 1916 or in subse- how national parks would differ from the wildlife within these units and to quent generic acts,requires a legislative national forests,whether all 12 existing provide for the enjoyment of the same history. Such a history attempts to un- national parks were truly of national derstand the intent of Congress by ex- significance, and whether duplication ROBIN W. wINKS, a member of amining the act in question, all previ- of "scientific exhibits"was permissible NPCA's board, is professor of history ous bills (including drafts where ob- or desirable in a genuinely systemic and chairman of studies in the envi- tainable), all House and Senate debate, park system. Throughout testimom, ronment at Yale University. He is all committee hearings, and any other members of Congress demonstrated " completing a book,The Rise of printed records of the U.S.Congress by desire to see lands administered b� a the National Ethic, that traces the which the act became law. One must park service as unique, nationally si- distinctive nature of the park system. also understand the intent of the legis- nificant,and forming a coherent whc I 52 JUtY/ AUGUST 1996 �r ratiher than a mere accumulation of ics added) for the enjoyment of future fence," that it was listing priorities for more-or-less desirable land forms.Rep- generations." During hearings on this management in the order of their im- resentatives also discussed the "auto- bill, many references were made to ac- portance,with no contradictory intent. mobile question,"and the park point of cess, good roads, "national play- To be sure, the act of 1916 does list ti-iew was to manage so as "not to de- grounds," and recreation, but none of two duties. The-Park Service has al- stroy die scenic effect." these references is in the bill,and all are lowed them to become contradictory Although the hill introduced in contradicted by the actual language of practice, Congress has confused itself 1912 never made it out of committee, the act. and the public as to the purpose of the Congress would consider legislation to Congressman William Kent of Cali- national parks, and both Congress and establish a park service in each of the fornia had introduced the Organic Act, the service appear to have forgotten the next four years and his understanding of the purposes original intent,so that units that do not During the 1914 discussion, repre- of national parks is quite clear from his attain genuine national significance sentatives suggested the purpose of the private papers, his diaries, his manu- have been created to help with tourist parks was to protect scenery.They dis- script autobiography, and his many development or to offer recreational cussed what constitues"scenery,"draw- public statements. In 1915, in speaking opportunities. But these are mistaken ing clearly on the accepted definitions management decisions -not in ketping of the word as used in the Century Dictto- with the intent of the act. Directors of nary and Cyclopedia, the favored reference i the Park Service have interpreted the act of Congress at the time.This discussion from time to time, and Congress has put considerable distance between the amended its intent, as expressed in goals of the U.S. Forest Service and the 1916, in other omnibus hills involving proposed Park Service. Even Chief The the park system, rnost especially in Forester Henry S. Graves testified that act refers to en o ment 1970. 1976,and 1980.The act of 1970 national parks should be held to higher l y remarked upon the "increased national standards of protection and scenic val- by future generations. idignity" both "individually and collec- ues than any other public lands.He also At no point is enjoy- Lively" that the national parks enjoyed, testified that they must be of clear na- so that an infringement upon one was tional significance and that areas of"a ment equated with an infringement upon all. Congress special scenic character"might begin as recreation, and it is may have muddied the waters some- national monuments within the De- what, but the intent of the original act partment ofAgriculture and then, upon ! Clearly circumscribed remains quite clear. further study, become parks.The intent Recently the National Parks and quite clearly was to provide a far more by unimpaired. Conservation Association has undertak- stringent form of protection to any area en the compilation of all the acts by that would be administered by a park in the House in favor of Rocky Moun- which each of the 369 units of the Na- service. tain National Park, and in 1913, when tional Park System was created. Park su- During the 1916 hearings, the proposing a Redwood National Park, perintendents who profess to be con- phrase"national park system"was used he declared the preservation of scenery fused as to their mandate, who find it for the first time, evoking the image of to be a "most valuable purpose,"draw- difficult to make management deci- a systematic inventory of the nation's ing a distinction among national sions (whether to pave a road, to build grandest scenic landscapes and natural forests, national monuments, and na- a new visitor center, to approve the use and scientific curiosities. For the first tional parks,asserting that the last must in a national park of some shiny new time, the notion of the parks as great be held"in a state of nature"where an- toy, whether snowmobile or powered educational enterprises, places to imal life must be "forever free from boat), have two documents to which which the public could come to learn molestation."Had Kent intended recre- they should turn and on which they about nature, geology, fossils, and sedi- ational purposes for the parks, he sure- should base their decision.The hill by mentation, was also discussed. In the ly would have said so, for he was a vice which an individual unit is created in- end, this bill prevailed. It contained a president of the Playground and Recre- variably states the primary resource that preamble framed by Frederick Law ation Association of America. the Park Service has been charged with Olmsted, Jr. Olmsted's draft language In 1922 Kent commended the state- protecting. The act of 1916 makes it was unequivocal: "The fundamental ob- ment that national parks must be main- clear that protection overrides all else. ject of these aforesaid parks, monu- rained in a natural state "and not be Where access may be provided, where ments, and reservations is to conserve marred by artificiality of any avoidable an enriched interpretation may he of- the scenery and the natural and histori- kind." The act of 1916 was debated fered, without darnage to the resource, cal objects therein and to provide for fully in the House, only briefly in the it rnay—indeed, perhaps should—be the enjoyment of said scenery and ob- Senate, and an abundance of evidence provided: but never at the cost of risk to jects by the public in any manner and by exists that Congress understood, in its the resource for which the unit was any means that will lemr them unimpaired (ital- endorsement of the "governing sen- created. at NATIONAL PARKS 53 RESPONSE ACTION PROPOSED IT STAPP Hoard President Acknowledge/Respond Director Acknowledge/Respond Staff Acknowledge/Respond • Draft Response Attached Linda V. Elkind Staff to ba Directed Co Prepare Draft 14 Hawk View Response far board Consideration par Hoard Directives) Portola Valley, CA 94028 No Response Necessary October 23, 1996 Board President, Nonette Hanko and Members of the Board MROSD 330 Distel Drive Los Altos, CA 94022 Dear Board President, Nonette Hanko, and Members of the Board, I am writing some comments as my way of participating in the October 30 workshop on district policy revisions. Due to a conflict I will not be able to attend the workshop. However, I have reviewed the document which outlines the existing policies and revision language which is to be considered. Basic Policies Brochure: Introduction. I recommend adoption of The language sited as from (Open Space Acquisition Policies, pg. 3. ) It is in the left hand column. My reasons are: 1. It is concise, specific and comprehensive. 2. It states the concept of low-intensity recreation and nature appreciation up front. Mission Statement. I totally support the mission expressed in the mission statement. I recommend version 2, from staff workshops 4/9 and 4117. My reason is: It is the most concise, specific and comprehensive. Objectives. I recommend adoption of the existing language which is in the left hand column of the document. This is preferable because it states the regional greenbelt intent of MROSD's program. Policies/District Purpose: I recommend adoption of the paragraph on the left hand side of the page. I believe that this is more consistent with the mission and clearly states an important concern of the MROSD to avoid high intensity use recreation. Strategic Emphasis: I recommend keeping the existing language. In particular, it is important to reiterate that the goal is to acquire lands. The alternate language is weaker when it says the "primary thrust of District policy..." Open Space Acquisition(Eminent Domain): The paragraph on the right side of the page is clear. However, I urge that you change the wording as follows: "The power of eminent domain will be used only in those instances where all reasonable attempts at voluntary negotiations fail and the parcel in question is necessary to the open space program of the District." Resource Management. I strongly recommend readopting the existing (Resource Management Mission Statement) which appears in the left hand column. I think that the newly proposed language under public access, cost constraints is much weaker than the original statements. It is important to make a strong, concise and clear statement about access and constraints. The original language does that very well and is extremely important because, the demand for increased recreation facilities will sky rocket with the population growth in our region. Land acquisition and preservation will continue to be more difficult. Maintenance of existing facilities will consume ever greater amounts of the districts funds. Recreational Use and Improvements. Paragraph d. Please adopt the language in the left hand column. Do not make the statement that * initial development will be primarily for low-intensity recreation..." This is too weak and suggests, may even be interpreted, as an invitation to expand the districts responsibilities to provide more recreation. To state that the improvements should be limited to 5% of the District's income in the first 10 years will siphon away acquisition money. In addition, I advice against leasing or selling land and facilities to other agencies. The track record of land management by other agencies is poor. Often the other agency is not sufficiently dedicated to preserving the natural resource values of the land or lacks the funds to do so. Meanwhile, the district will have to oversee the lease and may not have the leverage and resources to do so. The land and the people lose. There are numerous egregious examples of misused County Park land along Coyote Creek, for example. These lands were delegated to San Jose for park and recreation purposes. In conclusion: please adopt language which uncompromisingly supports open space acquisition and preservation with limited passive recreation and minimal or no facilities. Sincerely, 1 RESPONSE ACTION PROPOSED BY STAFF Board President Acknowledge/Respond 3Kain, 0$ :0 6 A1K l O j2 g`9 6, 12egionaZ�pen Space Director Acknowledge/Respond Staff Aeknowledge/Respond Date : Tue, 29 Oct 96 08 : 06 : 29 PST Draft Response Attached From: "BKain" <bkain@mdyn. com> Staff to be Directed to Prepare Draft R capon s• for Board Consideration per To : mrosd@openspace .org Board Directive(a) Subject : Regional Open Space Plan No Response Necessary Dear Board of Directors, ROMP wanted to pass on a few comments in light of the upcoming public meeting, on the development of a "Regional Open Space Plan" . There are many Mountain Cyclists in the area with diverse needs in terms of trails and trail locations . Below is a brief summary of the needs of a Mountain Cyclists . Provide for a variety of mountain cycling trail experiences and ride lengths . Some examples are : 1 Trails close to urban area and trails through more rugged and undeveloped environments 2 Wide double track and narrow twisty single track trails 3 Short loops, long loops, and regional trail connectors We understand that not every user is a Mountain Cyclists and not every trail will be open to cycling. We respect the right of other users to have trails that will provide other types of experiences . That is OK. We also believe that the majority of trails should be multi-use trails open to hiking, horseback riding, and mouton biking. We strongly believe that any policy should include Mountain Cycling as one of the three main uses of the land and guarantee that all trail decisions will be made based on objective criteria, in a fair and impartial manner. Thank you for your stewardship of some of the best lands in the San Francisco Bay Area. Bob Kain ROMP President Prin-�ed—for Fig com Smit <mrosopenspace.org> Draft Basic policy Revision BASIC POLICIES BROCHURE INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION "...to try to save for everyone. . . . some Open space is defined as land or water of the health that flows down across the area that either remains in its natural green ridges from the Skyline, and some state or is used for agriculture or of the beauty and refreshment of spirit that otherwise essentially undeveloped. are still available to any resident of the Open space provides protection for valley who has a moment. . . . to lift up areas of particular scenic beauty and his eyes unto the hills." enhances the survival prospects for endangered plant and animal species. -Wallace Stegner It enhances public safety through the minimization of flood erosion, Open ice: landslide, earthquake, and fire hazards. It provides room for production of • Is land area that is allowed to remain food. It can help shape urban growth in or return to its natural state. Some and thus provide a more livable and efficient urban environment. In short, open space lands may be used for compatible agriculture. open space means "room to breathe". • Protects areas of scenic beauty and preserves natural habitats necessary to sustain plant and animal life, especially native and endangered species. • Offers opportunities to the public for education, recreation, and renewal of spirit. • Improves public safety by preventing development of areas prone to landslides, earthquake damage, flooding, and wildland fires. • Establishes boundaries for urban growth, provides a respite from urban living, and enhances regional quality of life. In short, open space is "room to breathe." (An alternative Introduction prepared by a subconuniuee consisting of Carleen Bruins, Dennis Danielson, and Craig Beckman.) -1- i Draft Basic Policy Revision 818/96 BASIC POLICIES BROCHUW INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Open space is defined as land area that peen space is defined as land or water remains in its natural state, is used for compatible agriculture, and, in some area that either remains in its natural cases, developed land that is returned to a otherwise essentially state or is used fora agriculture or undeveloped. natural state. Open space provides peen space provides protection r protection for plant and animal �� of particular scenic beau and communities, including endangered enhance survival prospects or species, and for areas of particular scenic P � beauty. It enhances public safety by endangered plant and animal species. minimizing flooding, erosion, landslide, It enhances public safety through the earthquake, and fire hazards. It can help minimization of flood erosion, guide urban growth and thus provide a landslide, earthquake, and fire hazards. more liveable and sustainable urban It provides room for production of environment. It provides opportunities to food. It can help shape urban growth the public for low-intensity outdoor and thus provide a more livable and recreation and appreciation of nature. In efficient urban environment. In short, short, open space means "room to open space means "room to breathe". breathe." (See Open Space Acquisition Policies, Pg 3). MISSION STATEMENT The District's mission is: (version 1,from 1127 workshop) To acquire and protect open space land in perpetuity; preserve and restore the integrity of natural resources; and provide opportunities for public enjoyment and education consistent with open space educational values. (version 2,from staff workshops 419 and 4117) To acquire and preserve a regional greenbelt of open space land in perpetuity; protect and restore the integrity of the natural environment; and provide opportunities for public enjoyment and education, consistent with ecological values. -1- OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES 1. The District will purchase or 1. Open Space Land Preservation: The otherwise acquire interest in the District will purchase or otherwise maximum feasible amount of acquire interest in the maximum feasible strategic open space land within the area of strategic* open space land within bR Pe Pa Dis trict, includi ng ding baylands and the District, including baylands and foothills. foothills. The goal is to preserve a regional greenbelt of open space lands, linking District lands with federal, state, county, and city parklands and watershed lands. * (See Open Space Acquisition Policies, Pgs. 2 - 6). Policies Policies District Purpose District Purpose a. As an open space agency, the District's a• The District will function as an open space agency. Its primary primary purpose will be to preserve open purpose will be to preserve open space; space; development and operation of use- traditional development of park and intensive park and recreation facilities will recreation areas will remain within the remain within the province of the local, province of the cities and the counties. state, and federal park systems. (See Master Plan/Open Space Acquisition Policies, Pg. 3; Land Acquisition Policies, Pg. 3, Par. F.) Strategic Emphasis Strategic Emphasis b. The District will use its available b. The District will use its available resources primarily to acquire or otherwise resources primarily to acquire open preserve land outside the Urban Service space outside the Urban Service Area boundaries of the cities. This policy Area boundaries of cities that has would allow some acquisition of key regionally significant open space value and open space within the Urban Service that might be lost to development if the Area. The District's priority will be to District fails to act. (See Master use its limited resources to acquire Plan/Open Space Acquisition Policies, Pg. interest in parcels having high open 6.) space value which might be developed if the District fails to act. -2- The District's goal is to acquire lands The primary thrust of District policy within its own boundaries and Sphere of will be to acquire lands within its own Influence. Acquisitions outside the boundaries. The District will consider District's boundaries will be considered acquisitions outside the District only it only if exceptional purchase opportunities exceptional purchase opportunities arise arise that clearly support the District's that clearly would accrue to the benefit mission. (See Land Acquisition Policies, of the District. Pg. 3.) Open Space Acquisition Acquisition in Fee, Development Rights, Easements, Leaseback, Gifts, c. The District will acquire land most Grants, Life Estates, Condemnation often through fee simple interest, (outright ownership). Options and installment c. The District will acquire direct purchases will be employed to this end. interest in land, probably most often To conserve funding for preservation, the through fee interest, that is outright District will seek to preserve open space ownership. Options and installment without outright ownership of the land. purchases will be employed to this end, The District will act as a land bank The District will act as a land bank through acquisition of less than fee interest through acquisition of less than fee to accomplish the same results with less interest to accomplish the same results immediate expenditure of the District's with less immediate expenditure of the funds. Examples include acquisition of a District's funds. For example, remainder interest with life tenancy for the acquisition of a remainder interest with owner; open space, conservation, or scenic life tenancy for the owner will allow easements; and purchase and leaseback current use of the land to continue with arrangements. The District will actively no expenditure for land management. strive to acquire open space through gifts Open space, conservation, or scenic and matching grants. Gifts of land with easements will be acquired. Where life tenancy will be encouraged. Other agriculture is at least marginally creative open space preservation profitable, purchase and leaseback techniques will be explored and developed arrangements will be used in some when possible. (See Land Acquisition cases. The District will actively strive Policies, Pgs. 5 - 10.) to acquire open space through gifts and matching grants. Gifts of land with life tenancy will be encouraged. Other creative open space preservation techniques will be explored and developed. -3- e The District desires to acquire open space The power of eminent domain will be from willing sellers. Eminent domain may used only in those instances where all be used only within the District's reasonable attempts at voluntary boundaries and sphere of influence in those negotiations fail and the parcel in instances where all reasonable attempts at question is central to the open space voluntary negotiations have failed, the program of the District. Any property in question is necessary to the contemplated condemnation action will District's open space program; and where include a full public hearing. As in all there are no feasible current or prospective condemnation procedures, fair market alternate acquisitions that would achieve value as decided by a jury and based the District's objectives. (See Polices on adequate appraisals will be paid by Regarding Use of Eminent Domain, the District. Ordinance No. 86-1.) Master Plan, Regional Open Space Plan Master Plan d. To guide the District's open space d. As a guide to appropriate land preservation efforts, the District will acquisition, the District will develop a publish a master plan and a regional open master plan, which will be published. space plan. The master plan sets forth the This plan will set forth the District's District's acquisition policies and shows acquisition policies and priorities and the relative priorities for potential open will be subject to periodic review and space land acquisitions. The regional open modification by the Board of Directors space plan shows the general configuration after public hearings. The master plan and features of the completed greenbelt. will be submitted to the counties and Both plans will be subject to periodic cities for review and comment in order review and modification by the Board of to assure compatibility with their Directors after public hearings. Both plans General Plans. will be submitted to the counties, cities, and other conservation-oriented local, state, and federal agencies and organizations for review and comment in order to encourage consistency with their plans. -4- i 2. Inter-Agency Relationships: The '' District will work with and encourage private and other public agencies to 2• The District will work with and preserve, maintain, and enhance open encourage private and other public agencies to preserve, maintain, and space. enhance open space. Policies Policies Cooperation Cooperation a. The District will promote and a. The District will promote encourage cooperation between cooperation with and encourage governmental agencies, private governmental agencies, privateorganizations, and individuals to organizations, individuals, and the District preserve open space. to preserve open space. (See Open Space Acquisition Policies, Pgs. 9, 10.) Participation Participation b. The District will participate in the formulation of land use plans of other b. The District will participate in the agencies that affect the District. formulation of land use plans of other agencies that affect the District. Joint Actions Joint Projects C. The District will explore and engage in joint actions in order to maximize the opportunities for C. The District will explore and engage in preservation of open space. For projects joint 'ects to maximize the P example, in some cases the counties or opportunities for reservation of o ppo P pen other governmental agencies may have space. Examples include interagency land resources available to commit to land management agreements, joint planning or management or to park development research studies, and joint acquisition, but not to acquisition, and the District improvement, or resource management may acquire the affected land or water projects. area. In other instances, the District will support joint studies that appear to Advocacy afford the most economical means of . d. The District will encourage and gathering data needed to make an acquisition decision. advocate preservation of open space by other governmental agencies, such as the Advocacy cities and the counties which, unlike the District, have zoning powers to aid in this d. The District will propose and urge protection. Serving as an advocate for the preservation of open space to other protection of the area's natural governmental agencies, such as the environmental resources, the District will cities and the counties which, unlike support and encourage community groups, the District, have zoning powers to aid non-profits and other conservation oriented in this protection. It will also serve as groups in their efforts to urge other an advocate for the protection of the agencies to take actions consistent with the area's natural environmental resources, goals of the District. The District will lend support to those groups which are urging other agencies to take actions consistent with the goals of the District. -5- v► 3. The District will follow a land 3. Open Space Management: The management policy that provides District will follow an the management proper care of open space land, policy that ensures proper care of the allowing public access appropriate to land, that provides public access the nature of the land and consistent appropriate to the nature of the land with ecological values. and consistent with ecological values, and public safety. (See Resource Policies Management Policies) Preservation Policies a. Careful planning and great care will be taken to protect the natural beauty Resource Management and ecological balance of the lands of the District. a. The District will protect and restore the Good Neighbor Policy diversity and integrity of its resources for their value to the environment, and to b. The District will make every effort people, and will provide for the use of the to be a "good neighbor" to other preserves consistent with resource property owners. Adequate patrol, protection. (Resource Management maintenance, and public education will Mission Statement) be provided to minimize fire hazards, litter, noise, erosion, unsound use of Public Access and Constraints the land, disturbance of wildlife and b. The District will provide public access vegetation, and trespassing. to the open space lands for low-intensity Public Access Cost Constraints recreational uses. The District's highest Environmental Constraints, Other priority is preserving land to complete the Constraints, Permitted Access greenbelt, the development of facilities to meet the demands of increased public use c. With certain limitations, the District will require funding that would otherwise will allow public access to its lands. be available for acquisition. (See Resource Because no agency in this area has Management Policies) contemplated acquiring open space in such quantity so close to urban areas, the financial resources required for maintenance of acquired lands will be an important consideration. It is clear that the more funds are expended in development of facilities and supervision of public access, the less will be available for acquisition. This constraint will necessitate limited types and quantity of access on at least some of the lands of the District. Some -6- Developing facilities and managing public lands will be banked for a period of use activities while protecting natural time prior to opening to public use. resources and providing for public safety Areas found to be vital wildlife or may require limits on access to some open plant habitats will be designated as space lands. In addition to protection of refuge areas, and in these areas access sensitive natural resources, factors that will be severely restricted. Safety may delay or limit access include the factors such as dangerous physical carrying capacity of the land, restoration conditions will necessitate limited efforts, the ability to plan and implement access in some areas. Agricultural trails, parking, restrooms, mapboards and land will also require restricted public signs, and identification and mitigation of use. In some cases use will be potential safety hazards. regulated by a permit system. In general, access will be allowed Agricultural, residential, and other according to the availability of facilities enterprise (revenue producing) uses of the and supervision essential to the land may limit public access in certain intended use, and according to the areas. Where appropriate, access may be carrying capacity of the land. Use will provided on a permit basis. be open to everyone regardless of place of residence. The District will strive to provide public access to its lands to everyone, regardless of place of residence, physical abilities, or economic status. (See Access Plan for Persons with Disabilities) Public Safety c. The District will monitor and manage its preserves to provide a safe environment for visitors and neighbors. (See Good Neighbor Policy, District Land Use Regulations.) -7- Recreational Use and Improvements Recreation, Cost Limits, Cooperative Efforts d. Improvements on District lands will generally be limited to facilities (ie: d. Initial development will be parking areas, trails and patrol roads, primarily for low-intensity recreation restrooms, mapboards, and signs) for low- such as hiking, riding, grass intensity recreational uses. Low-intensity picnicking, photography, and nature recreation includes hiking, horseback study. Because of the commitment to riding, bicycling, informal picnicking, maximum acquisition efforts, initial photography, and nature study. Low- expenditures on recreational intensity recreation avoids concentration of improvements will be limited to not use or designation of areas exclusively for more than 5% of the District's income one use, significant alteration of the land, in the first 14 years. The District will and significant impact on the natural seek arrangements with other resources or on the appreciation of nature. governmental agencies whereby the (See Resource Management Policies) other agencies will provide some or all development of facilities and Special use facilities, (i.e. nature centers, supervision of public access. This can historic structures, picnic tables, or include making land available to other backpack camps), and special use activities agencies by long term lease, sale, or (i.e. large recreation events, hang gliding, similar arrangement. The District will or off-leash dog areas), will be considered insure that such development will on a case by case basis. These types of protect important natural values of the uses may be allowed when they do not open space. monopolize significant areas of natural land, do not significantly impact natural or aesthetic resources, and provide benefits such as environmental education, heritage resource protection, or public enjoyment and appreciation of nature. The cost of management of these types of facilities and activities will be a factor in deciding whether to permit them on District lands. Because of the District's commitment to maximum open space preservation efforts, expenditure guidelines will be established for the amount of funding available for recreational improvement projects and restoration activities. The District will work cooperatively with other governmental agencies and organizations to facilitate development and management of recreation facilities and of public use. The District will ensure that such development is consistent with protection of important natural values of the open space. -8- Cultural Resources e. Historic structures and sites will be protected by the District where they are associated with lands acquired for overall open space values. Due to the high cost of evaluating, managing, and restoring such facilities, the District will depend on grant assistance, public-private partnerships, and outside assistance to support these activities. Sites will be evaluated for archaeological resources prior to any new use or improvement which might impact the site. Archaeological resources will be evaluated, protected, and made known to the public as appropriate to ensure their preservation. (See Resource Management Policies) Agriculture and Enterprise Use Agriculture f. Agricultural use of District land, such e. Where feasible, agricultural use as grazing, timber harvest, orchards, and will be sustained and encouraged. vineyards may be allowed when it does not utilize significant areas of natural land, does not significantly impact natural or aesthetic resources, does not unreasonably restrict public access, and provides benefits such as heritage resource protection, fire hazard reduction, or income to the District. Limited enterprise (revenue-producing) use of District land, such as rental residences, communications antennas, or special commercial use such as filming, will be allowed when it meets the above standards. (See Resource Management Policies, Goals 10 and 11.) -9- Research g. The District will support the development of scientific knowledge about natural and cultural resources and management techniques through cooperative arrangements with educational and scientific institutions, and by supporting research on which to base its management and improvement decisions. Such studies shall not unreasonably restrict public access or significantly impact the environment. Neighbor Relations h. In both the day-today conduct of its business and in the long-range planning for public open space preserves, the District shall make every effort to cooperate with preserve neighbors, to take into account their perspectives, to fully address their concerns, and to engage and involve them in the process of making decisions regarding the preserves of which they are neighbors. Active management, patrol, maintenance, and public education will be provided to minimize threats to public safety, fire hazards, litter, noise, erosion, unsound use of the land, disturbance of wildlife and vegetation, and trespassing. (See Good Neighbor Policy, Public Notification Policies, District Land Use Regulations) 4. The District will educate and 4. Public Involvement: The District make clearly visible to the public the will educate and make clearly visible to purposes and actions of the District, the public the purposes and actions of and will actively encourage public the District, and will actively encourage communication and involvement in public input and involvement in the District activities. District's decision-making process and other activities. (See Rules of Procedure, Notification Policies, Land Acquisition Policies, Pgs. 15, 16) -10- Policies Public Information Information Dissemination a. The District will work through a a. The District will work through a variety of means and media to inform the variety of avenues, including public of the District's goals and newspapers and other mass objectives, its short and long-term plans, communications media, brochures, the critical need for open space speakers, and the schools, to inform preservation, and the appropriate use of the public of the critical need for open District lands. This information shall be space preservation and the appropriate disseminated to the widest possible use of District lands as they open to constituency throughout the District. the public. Landowners and potential Land-owners and potential donors will be donors will be adequately informed of adequately informed of the District's the District's purpose and goals, and of purpose and goals, and of the possible the possible methods of preserving land methods of preserving land as open space. as open space. Meeting Procedures visibility b. The District will diligently follow the b. The District will work in the open, provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act making its actions and motives clearly regarding open meeting procedures, and visible to its constituency. In order tu: will be guided by its enabling legislation insure fair prices to the public and under the state Public Resources Code, maintain the confidentiality the owner Article 3, Division 5, Chapter 3, Section requires, the District will often have to 5500. The District will encourage and wait until proposed terms of sale have welcome public participation at its been negotiated before announcing its meetings and make its actions, intents, and interest in acquiring a particular parcel. decisions clearly visible to its constituency. Then the Board of Directors will ask for public comment before finally Public Input deciding to purchase specific proper c. The District will encourage and Communication welcome communication from the public by being as accessible to the public as c. The District will encourage possible and by regularly soliciting public communication from the public in three comments about what the District should principal areas. First, the staff and be accomplishing and how it should Board will strive to be as accessible proceed. (See Public Notification and the public as possible. Second, public Goad Neighbor policies.) comments about what the District should be accomplishing and how it should proceed will be encouraged. And third, the District will seek frorr, the public at large information concerning specific parcels of land to aid in making acquisition decisions. -11- Participation Participation d. The District will seek to involve the d. The District will seek to involve public in the operation and decision- the public in the operation of the making of the District and in general District and in general planning for planning for acquisition and future use of acquisition and future use of open open space lands through special space lands. workshops, committees and task forces, and public outreach activities. Through staff and volunteer programs, the District 5. The staff will administer the will provide environmental education and affairs of the District in behalf of the foster public appreciation of open space public so as to maximize values. accomplishment of the goals of the District within existing financial constraints. 5. Administration: The staff will administer the affairs of the District on behalf of the public so as to maximize Policies accomplishment of the goals of the District within existing financial Cost Constraints constraints. a. Because the District is committed to maximum acquisition effort, it will Policies keep administrative expenses low by operating with a limited staff and by Cost Constraints utilizing the help of already existing governmental and private agencies and a. Because the District is committed to contractual services. maximum preservation effort, it will limit administrative expense growth by Professional Organization following an average annual operating expenses growth guideline, and by b. The District will employ a highly utilizing the help of other governmental capable and professional staff and agencies, private entities, contractual provide them with the facilities and services, and volunteers. resources needed to run an efficient and responsible organization. Professional Organization 1 i b. The District employs a highly capable p Ado ted March 27, 1974 and professional staff and provides them with the facilities and resources needed to Revised May 1, 1980 run an efficient and responsible organization. -12-